UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
| |
ý | ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
| |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
|
| | | |
NATURAL
RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P. |
| (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) | |
|
| | |
Delaware | | 35-2164875 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.) |
1201 Louisiana Street, Suite 3400 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) |
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: |
| | | | |
Title of each class | | Trading Symbol(s) | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Units representing limited partner interests | | NRP | | New
York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No ý Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No ý Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit such files). Yes ý No ¨ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definition of "accelerated filer", "large accelerated filer", "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. |
| |
Large Accelerated Filer | ¨ |
Accelerated Filer | ý |
Non-accelerated
Filer | ¨ |
Smaller Reporting Company | ¨ |
Emerging Growth Company | ¨ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨ Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2) Yes ¨ No ý The aggregate market value of the common units held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 28, 2019, was $318 million based on a closing price on that date of $35.46 per unit as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements included in this 10-K may constitute forward-looking statements. In addition, we and our representatives may from time to time make other oral or written statements which are also forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements regarding: our business strategy; our liquidity and access to capital and financing sources; our financial strategy; prices of and demand for coal, trona and soda ash, and other natural resources; estimated revenues, expenses and results of operations; projected production
levels by our lessees; Ciner Wyoming LLC’s ("Ciner Wyoming's") trona mining and soda ash refinery operations; distributions from our soda ash joint venture; the impact of governmental policies, laws and regulations, as well as regulatory and legal proceedings involving us, and of scheduled or potential regulatory or legal changes; and global and U.S. economic conditions.
These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof and are made based upon our current plans, expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events impacting us and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees and that actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. See "Item
1A. Risk Factors" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for important factors that could cause our actual results of operations or our actual financial condition to differ.
PART I
As used in this Part I, unless the context otherwise requires: "we," "our,"
"us" and the "Partnership" refer to Natural Resource Partners L.P. and, where the context requires, our subsidiaries. References to "NRP" and "Natural Resource Partners" refer to Natural Resource Partners L.P. only, and not to NRP (Operating) LLC or any of Natural Resource Partners L.P.’s subsidiaries. References to "Opco" refer to NRP (Operating) LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of NRP, and its subsidiaries. NRP Finance Corporation ("NRP Finance") is a wholly owned subsidiary of NRP and a co-issuer with NRP on the 9.125% senior notes due 2025 (the "2025 Senior Notes").
ITEMS
1. AND 2. BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES
Partnership Structure and Management
We are a publicly traded Delaware limited partnership formed in 2002. We own, manage and lease a diversified portfolio of mineral properties in the United States, including interests in coal and other natural resources and own a non-controlling 49% interest in Ciner Wyoming LLC ("Ciner Wyoming"), a trona ore mining and soda ash production business.
Our business is organized into two operating segments:
Coal Royalty and Other—consists primarily of coal royalty properties and coal-related transportation and processing assets. Other assets include industrial mineral royalty properties, aggregates royalty
properties, oil and gas royalty properties and timber. Our coal reserves are primarily located in Appalachia, the Illinois Basin and the Northern Powder River Basin in the United States. Our industrial minerals and aggregates properties are located in various states across the United States, our oil and gas royalty assets are primarily located in Louisiana and our timber assets are primarily located in West Virginia.
Soda Ash—consists of our 49% non-controlling equity interest in Ciner Wyoming, a trona ore mining and soda ash production business located in the Green River Basin of Wyoming. Ciner Resources LP, our operating partner, mines the trona, processes it into soda ash, and distributes the soda ash both domestically and internationally into the glass and chemicals industries.
Our
operations are conducted through Opco and our operating assets are owned by our subsidiaries. NRP (GP) LP, our general partner, has sole responsibility for conducting our business and for managing our operations. Because our general partner is a limited partnership, its general partner, GP Natural Resource Partners LLC, conducts its business and operations and the Board of Directors and officers of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC make decisions on our behalf. Robertson Coal Management LLC, a limited liability company wholly owned by Corbin J. Robertson, Jr., owns all of the membership interest in GP Natural Resource Partners
LLC. Subject to the Board Representation and Observation Rights Agreement with certain entities controlled by funds affiliated with The Blackstone Group Inc. (collectively referred to as "Blackstone") and affiliates of GoldenTree Asset Management LP (collectively referred to as "GoldenTree"), Mr. Robertson, Jr. is entitled to appoint the members of the Board of Directors of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC and has delegated the right to appoint one director to Blackstone.
The senior executives and other officers who manage NRP are employees of Western Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership or Quintana Minerals Corporation, which are companies controlled by Mr. Robertson, Jr. These officers
allocate varying percentages of their time to managing our operations. Neither our general partner, GP Natural Resource Partners LLC, nor any of their affiliates receive any management fee or other compensation in connection with the management of our business, but they are entitled to be reimbursed for all direct and indirect expenses incurred on our behalf.
We have regional offices through which we conduct our operations, the largest of which is located at 5260 Irwin Road, Huntington, West Virginia 25705 and the telephone
number is (304) 522-5757. Our principal executive office is located at 1201 Louisiana Street, Suite 3400, Houston, Texas 77002 and our telephone number is (713) 751-7507.
Segment
and Geographic Information
|
| | | | | | |
(In
thousands) | | Amount | | % of Total |
Coal Royalty and Other | | $ | 216,846 |
| | 82% |
Soda Ash | | 47,089 |
| | 18% |
Total | | $ | 263,935 |
| | 100% |
Coal
Royalty and Other Segment
Our coal reserves are primarily located in the Appalachia Basin, the Illinois Basin and the Northern Powder River Basin in the United States. We lease our reserves to experienced mine operators under long-term leases. Approximately two-thirds of our royalty-based leases have initial terms of five to 40 years, with substantially all lessees having the option to extend the lease for additional terms. Leases include the right to renegotiate royalties and minimum payments for the additional terms. We also own and manage coal-related transportation and processing assets in the Illinois Basin that generate additional revenues generally based on throughput or rents. As described in the "—Other Coal Royalty and Other Segment Assets" section below, we also own oil and gas, industrial minerals and aggregates
reserves that generate a portion of the Coal Royalty and Other segment revenues.
Under our standard royalty lease, we grant the operators the right to mine and sell our reserves in exchange for royalty payments based on the greater of a percentage of the sale price or fixed royalty per ton of minerals mined and sold. Lessees calculate royalty payments due to us and are required to report tons of minerals mined and sold as well as the sales prices of the extracted minerals. Therefore, to a great extent, amounts reported as royalty revenues are based upon the reports of our lessees. We periodically audit this information by examining certain records and internal reports of our lessees and we perform periodic mine inspections to verify that the information that our lessees have submitted to us is accurate. Our audit and inspection processes are designed to identify material variances
from lease terms as well as differences between the information reported to us and the actual results from each property.
In addition to their royalty obligations, our lessees are often subject to minimum payments, which reflect amounts we are entitled to receive even if no mining activity occurs during the period. Minimum payments are usually credited against future royalties that are earned as minerals are produced. In certain leases, the lessee is time limited on the period available for recouping minimum payments and such time is unlimited on other leases.
Because we do not operate any coal mines, our coal royalty business does not bear ordinary operating costs and has limited direct exposure to environmental, permitting and labor risks. Our lessees, as operators, are subject to
environmental laws, permitting requirements and other regulations adopted by various governmental authorities. In addition, the lessees generally bear all labor-related risks, including retiree health care costs, black lung benefits and workers’ compensation costs associated with operating the mines on our coal and aggregates properties. We pay property taxes on our properties, which are largely reimbursed by our lessees pursuant to the terms of the various lease agreements.
Coal
Reserves and Production Information
The following table presents coal reserves information as of December 31, 2019 for the properties that we own by major coal region: |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Proven and Probable Reserves (1) |
(Tons
in thousands) | | Underground | | Surface | | Total |
Appalachia Basin | | | | | | |
Northern | | 301,742 |
| | 3,031 |
| | 304,773 |
|
Central | | 720,378 |
| | 242,379 |
| | 962,757 |
|
Southern | | 57,881 |
| | 19,794 |
| | 77,675 |
|
Total
Appalachia Basin | | 1,080,001 |
|
| 265,204 |
|
| 1,345,205 |
|
Illinois Basin | | 299,818 |
| | 5,074 |
| | 304,892 |
|
Northern
Powder River Basin | | — |
| | 163,555 |
| | 163,555 |
|
Gulf Coast | | — |
| | 1,957 |
| | 1,957 |
|
Total | | 1,379,819 |
|
| 435,790 |
|
| 1,815,609 |
|
| |
(1) | In
excess of 90% of the reserves presented in this table are currently leased to third parties. |
The following table presents the type of our coal reserves by major coal region as of December 31, 2019: |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Type of Coal | | |
(Tons
in thousands) | | Thermal | | Metallurgical (1) | | Total |
Appalachia Basin | | | | | | |
Northern | | 243,939 |
| | 60,834 |
| | 304,773 |
|
Central | | 545,949 |
| | 416,808 |
| | 962,757 |
|
Southern | | 58,554 |
| | 19,121 |
| | 77,675 |
|
Total
Appalachia Basin | | 848,442 |
| | 496,763 |
| | 1,345,205 |
|
Illinois Basin | | 304,892 |
| | — |
| | 304,892 |
|
Northern
Powder River Basin | | 163,555 |
| | — |
| | 163,555 |
|
Gulf Coast | | 1,875 |
| | 82 |
| | 1,957 |
|
Total | | 1,318,764 |
| | 496,845 |
| | 1,815,609 |
|
| |
(1) | For
purposes of this table, we have defined metallurgical coal reserves as reserves located in seams that historically have been of sufficient quality and characteristics to be able to be used in the steel making process. Some of the reserves in the metallurgical category can also be used as thermal coal. |
The following table presents the sulfur content and the typical quality of our coal reserves by major coal region as of December 31,
2019: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Sulfur Content | | Typical
Quality (1) |
(Tons in thousands) | | Compliance Coal (2) | | Low (<1.0%) | | Medium (1.0% to 1.5%) | | High (>1.5%) | | Total | | Heat Content (Btu per pound) | | Sulfur (%) |
Appalachia
Basin | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Northern | | 46,307 |
| | 46,507 |
| | 1,002 |
| | 257,264 |
| | 304,773 |
| | 12,977 |
| | 2.61 |
|
Central | | 443,313 |
| | 677,143 |
| | 239,230 |
| | 46,384 |
| | 962,757 |
| | 13,238 |
| | 0.91 |
|
Southern | | 43,382 |
| | 47,905 |
| | 27,180 |
| | 2,590 |
| | 77,675 |
| | 13,405 |
| | 0.96 |
|
Total
Appalachia Basin | | 533,002 |
|
| 771,555 |
|
| 267,412 |
|
| 306,238 |
|
| 1,345,205 |
| | 13,189 |
| | 1.30 |
|
Illinois
Basin | | — |
| | — |
| | 2,152 |
| | 302,740 |
| | 304,892 |
| | 11,476 |
| | 3.29 |
|
Northern
Powder River Basin | | — |
| | 163,555 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 163,555 |
| | 8,800 |
| | 0.65 |
|
Gulf
Coast | | 82 |
| | 1,957 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,957 |
| | 6,964 |
| | 0.69 |
|
Total | | 533,084 |
|
| 937,067 |
|
| 269,564 |
|
| 608,978 |
|
| 1,815,609 |
| | | | |
| |
(1) | Unless
otherwise indicated, the coal quality information in this Annual Report and on the Form 10-K is reported on an as-received basis with an assumed moisture of 6% for Appalachia Basin reserves, and site specific moisture values for Illinois (typically 12% moisture) and Northern Powder River Basin (typically 25% moisture). |
| |
(2) | Compliance coal, when burned, emits less than 1.2 pounds of sulfur dioxide per million Btu and meets the sulfur dioxide emission standards imposed by Phase II of the Clean Air Act without blending with other coals or using sulfur dioxide reduction technologies. Compliance coal is a subset of low sulfur coal and is, therefore, also reported within the amounts for low sulfur coal. |
The
following table presents the type of coal sales volumes by major coal region for the year ended December 31, 2019: |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Type of Coal | | |
(Tons in thousands) | | Thermal | | Metallurgical | | Total |
Appalachia
Basin | | | | | | |
Northern | | 2,781 |
| | 679 |
| | 3,460 |
|
Central | | 3,117 |
| | 10,260 |
| | 13,377 |
|
Southern | | 470 |
| | 1,200 |
| | 1,670 |
|
Total
Appalachia Basin | | 6,368 |
| | 12,139 |
| | 18,507 |
|
Illinois Basin | | 2,201 |
| | — |
| | 2,201 |
|
Northern
Powder River Basin | | 3,036 |
| | — |
| | 3,036 |
|
Total | | 11,605 |
| | 12,139 |
| | 23,744 |
|
Methodologies Used in Mineral Reserve Estimation
All of the reserves reported above are recoverable proven or probable reserves as determined in accordance with the SEC’s Industry Guide 7 and are estimated by our internal geologists or independent third-party consultants. Significant internally generated reserve studies are reviewed by independent third-party consultants. The technologies and economic data used in the estimation of our proven or probable reserves include, but are not limited to, drill logs, geophysical logs, geologic maps including isopach, mine and coal quality, cross sections, statistical analysis and available public production data.
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating the quantities and qualities of recoverable reserves, including many factors beyond our control. Estimates of economically recoverable coal reserves depend upon a number of variable factors and assumptions, any one of which may, if incorrect, result in an estimate that varies considerably from actual results. In addition, the SEC has adopted new rules to modernize the property disclosure requirements for registrants with significant mining activities, which we will be required to begin to comply with for the fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2021 (reported in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2021). We are in the process of assessing the impact the new rules will have on our disclosures. The new rules require that reserve estimates that are reported be based on technical reports prepared
using extensive mine-specific geological and engineering data, as well as market and cost assumptions. As a royalty company, we may not have access to much of the information that is required to prepare the technical reports used to determine reserves under the new rules without unreasonable burden or expense. Accordingly, the amount of coal and other minerals that we are allowed to report under the new rules beginning with the year ending December 31, 2021 may differ materially from the reserves reported above. See "Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Our reserve estimates depend on many assumptions that may be inaccurate, which could materially adversely affect the quantities and value of our reserves. In addition, compliance with new SEC rules that will become effective beginning in 2021 could
result in material adjustments to the quantities of reserves we are allowed to report." Major Coal Producing Properties
The following table provides a summary of our significant coal royalty properties by sales volumes for 2019 and is followed by additional information for each property:
|
| | | | | | | | |
Region | | Property/Lease Name | | Operator(s) | | Coal
Type | | 2019 Sales Volumes (Millions of Tons) |
Appalachia Basin | | | | | | | | |
Northern | | Hibbs
Run | | Murray Energy Corporation | | Thermal | | 2.0 |
Northern | | Mettiki Coal | | Alliance Resource Partners | | Met/Thermal | | 0.8 |
Central | | Contura-CAPP
(VA) | | Contura Energy, Inc. | | Met | | 3.8 |
Central | | Coal Mountain | | CM Energy Properties, LP | | Met | | 1.3 |
Central
| | Aracoma | | Contura Energy, Inc. | | Met | | 1.2 |
Central | | Elk Creek | | Ramaco Resources, Inc. | | Met | | 1.1 |
Central | | Lynch | | Blackjewel,
LLC; InMet, LLC | | Met/Thermal | | 0.9 |
Southern | | Oak Grove | | Murray Metallurgical Coal Holdings LLC | | Met | | 1.2 |
Illinois
Basin | | Macoupin | | Foresight Energy LP | | Thermal | | 1.6 |
Illinois Basin | | Williamson | | Foresight Energy LP | | Thermal | | 0.3 |
Illinois
Basin | | Hillsboro | | Foresight Energy LP | | Thermal | | 0.2 |
Northern Powder River Basin | | Western Energy | | Rosebud Mining, LLC | | Thermal | | 3.0 |
Appalachia Basin—Northern Appalachia
Hibbs Run. The Hibbs Run property is located in Marion County, West Virginia. In 2019, approximately 2.0 million tons were sold from this thermal property. We lease this property to a subsidiary of Murray Energy Corporation. Coal from this property is produced from longwall mines and shipped by rail to utility customers. The royalty rate for this property is a low fixed rate per ton and has a significant effect on the weighted average per ton revenue for the region.
Mettiki
Coal. The Mettiki Coal property is located in Tucker and Grant Counties, West Virginia. In 2019, approximately 0.8 million metallurgical and thermal tons were sold from this property. We lease this property to a subsidiary of Alliance Resource Partners. Production comes from this mine via a longwall operation. Coal is shipped by truck to a local utility customer and by train to metallurgical customers. NRP pays an override royalty equal to the royalty received from Mettiki to Western Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership per the terms of the deed.
The map below shows the location of our major properties in Northern Appalachia:
Appalachia Basin—Central Appalachia
Contura-CAPP (VA). The Contura-CAPP (VA) property is located in Wise, Dickenson, Russell and Buchanan Counties, Virginia. In 2019, approximately 3.8 million tons were sold from this property, substantially all of which was metallurgical coal. We lease this property to subsidiaries of Contura Energy, Inc ("Contura Energy"). Production comes from underground room and pillar and surface mines and is trucked
to one of two preparation plants. Coal is shipped via the CSX and Norfolk Southern railroads to utility and metallurgical customers.
Coal Mountain. The Coal Mountain property is located in Wyoming County, West Virginia. In 2019, approximately 1.3 million tons of metallurgical coal were sold from this property. We lease this property to CM Energy Properties, LP. Metallurgical coal is produced from a multi-seam surface mine and coal is transported by truck to a preparation plant on the property. Coal is shipped via the Norfolk Southern railroad to both domestic and export metallurgical customers.
Aracoma. The Aracoma property is located in Logan
County, West Virginia. Approximately 1.2 million tons of coal, substantially all of which is metallurgical coal, were sold in 2019 from this property. We lease this property to a subsidiary of Contura Energy. Coal is produced from underground mines and transported by belt or truck to the preparation plant on the property. Coal is shipped via the CSX railroad to export metallurgical customers.
Elk Creek. The Elk Creek property is located in Logan and Wyoming Counties, West Virginia. In 2019, approximately 1.1 million tons were sold from this property. We lease this property to Ramaco Resources, Inc. Metallurgical coal is produced from surface and underground mines and is
transported by belt and truck to a preparation plant on the property. Coal is shipped via the CSX railroad to both domestic and export metallurgical customers.
Lynch. The Lynch property is located in Harlan and Letcher Counties, Kentucky and Wise County, Virginia. In 2019, approximately 0.9 million tons were sold from this property. Blackjewel, LLC ("Blackjewel") operated this property until it filed for bankruptcy in the third quarter of 2019. InMet, LLC obtained lease rights to a substantial portion of this property through the Blackjewel bankruptcy process and is currently operating on this lease. Production comes from underground room and pillar and surface mines. This property has the ability to ship coal on the CSX and Norfolk Southern railroads
to utility and metallurgical customers.
The map below shows the location of our major properties in Central Appalachia:
Appalachia Basin—Southern Appalachia
Oak Grove. The Oak Grove property is located in Jefferson County, Alabama. In 2019, approximately 1.2 million tons of metallurgical coal were sold from this property. We lease this property to Murray Metallurgical Coal Holdings, LLC ("Murray Metallurgical"). The lease was transferred to Murray Metallurgical in connection with Mission Coal LLC's bankruptcy proceedings. Production comes from a longwall mine and is transported by beltline to a preparation plant. Metallurgical products are then
shipped via railroad and barge to both domestic and export customers. While the mine was temporarily idled during the last quarter of 2019 and Murray Metallurgical filed bankruptcy in the first quarter of 2020, the Oak Grove mine is expected to resume production in 2020.
The map below shows the location of our major property in Southern Appalachia:
Illinois
Basin
Macoupin. The Macoupin property is located in Macoupin County, Illinois. This property is under lease to Macoupin Energy, a subsidiary of Foresight Energy LP ("Foresight Energy"). In 2019, approximately 1.6 million tons of thermal coal were sold from this property. Production is from an underground room and pillar mine. Coal is shipped by the Norfolk Southern or Union Pacific railroads or by barge to domestic utility customers.
Williamson. The Williamson property is located in Franklin and Williamson Counties, Illinois. This property is under lease to Williamson Energy, a subsidiary of Foresight Energy. In 2019,
approximately 0.3 million tons of thermal coal were sold from this property. Production comes from a longwall mine. Coal is shipped primarily via the Canadian National railroad to export customers. In 2019, we also received overriding royalties from approximately 5.5 million tons of coal sold from non-NRP property.
Hillsboro. The Hillsboro property is located in Montgomery and Bond Counties, Illinois. This property is under lease to Hillsboro Energy, a subsidiary of Foresight Energy. This property had been idled from March 2015 until production resumed in January 2019. In 2019, approximately 0.2 million tons of thermal coal were sold from this property. Production at the mine has historically come from longwall
mining methods; however, 2019 production came from continuous mining methods for development of a longwall panel. Coal is shipped by rail via either the Union Pacific, Norfolk Southern or Canadian National railroads, or by barges to domestic utilities customers.
In addition to these properties, we own loadout and other transportation assets at the Williamson and Macoupin mines and at the Sugar Camp mine, which are also operated by Foresight Energy. See "—Coal Transportation and Processing Assets" below for additional information on these assets.
The
map below shows the location of our major properties in the Illinois Basin:
Northern Powder River Basin
Western Energy. The Western Energy property is located in Rosebud and Treasure Counties, Montana. In 2019,
approximately 3.0 million tons were sold from this property by a subsidiary of Rosebud Mining, LLC. Coal is produced by surface dragline mining methods. Coal is transported by either truck or beltline to the Colstrip generation station located at the mine mouth.
The map below shows the location of our property in the Northern Powder River Basin:
Coal
Transportation and Processing Assets
We own transportation and processing infrastructure related to certain of our coal properties, including loadout and other transportation assets at Foresight Energy's Williamson and Macoupin mines in the Illinois Basin, for which we collect throughput fees or rents. We lease our Macoupin and Williamson transportation and processing infrastructure to subsidiaries of Foresight Energy and are responsible for operating and maintaining the transportation and processing assets at the Williamson mine that we subcontract to a subsidiary of Foresight Energy. In addition, we own rail loadout and associated infrastructure at the Sugar Camp mine, an Illinois Basin mine also operated by a subsidiary of Foresight Energy. While we own coal reserves at the Williamson
and Macoupin mines, we do not own coal reserves at the Sugar Camp mine. The infrastructure at the Sugar Camp mine is leased to a subsidiary of Foresight Energy and we collect minimums and throughput fees. We recorded $19.3 million in revenue related to our coal transportation and processing assets during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Other Coal Royalty and Other Segment Assets
As of December 31, 2019, we owned an estimated 172 million tons of aggregates reserves primarily located in Kentucky and Indiana. We lease a portion of these reserves to third
parties in exchange for royalty payments. The structure of these leases is similar to our coal leases, and these leases typically require minimum rental payments in addition to royalties. In addition, we hold overriding royalty interests in approximately 82 million tons of frac sand at operations in Wisconsin and Texas and sand and gravel reserves in Washington. During 2019, our lessees sold 4.5 million tons from these properties and we received $4.3 million in aggregates royalty revenues, including overriding royalty revenues.
Through our 51% ownership of BRP LLC ("BRP"), a joint venture with International Paper Company, we own approximately 10 million mineral acres in 31 states in the U.S. that include the following assets:
| |
• | approximately
300,000 gross acres of oil and natural gas mineral rights primarily in Louisiana, of which over 53,000 acres were leased as of December 31, 2019; |
| |
• | approximately 50 million tons of aggregates reserves primarily located in North Carolina, Arkansas and South Carolina and approximately 6 million tons of override royalty interest in South Carolina and Georgia; |
| |
• | approximately 2 million tons of coal reserves (primarily lignite
and some bituminous coal) on 95,000 net mineral acres of coal rights in the Gulf Coast region, of which approximately 5,600 acres are leased in Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas; |
| |
• | an overriding royalty interest of 1% (net) on approximately 25,000 mineral acres in Louisiana; |
| |
• | copper rights in Michigan's Upper Peninsula; and |
| |
• | various
other mineral rights including coalbed methane, metals, aggregates, water and geothermal, in several states throughout the United States. |
While the vast majority of the 10 million acres owned by BRP remain largely undeveloped, BRP has an ongoing program to identify additional opportunities to lease its minerals to operating parties or otherwise monetize these assets.
Soda
Ash Segment
We own a 49% non-controlling equity interest in Ciner Wyoming. Ciner Resources LP, our operating partner, controls and operates Ciner Wyoming. Ciner Resources LP mines the trona, processes it into soda ash, and distributes the soda ash both domestically and internationally into the glass and chemicals industries. Ciner Resources LP is a publicly traded master limited partnership that depends on distributions from Ciner Wyoming in order to make distributions to its public unitholders.
Ciner Wyoming is one of the largest and lowest cost producers of soda ash in the world, serving a global market from its facility located in the Green River Basin of Wyoming. The Green River Basin geological formation holds the largest, and one of the highest purity, known deposits of trona
ore in the world. Trona, a naturally occurring soft mineral, is also known as sodium sesquicarbonate and consists primarily of sodium carbonate, or soda ash, sodium bicarbonate and water. Ciner Wyoming processes trona ore into soda ash, which is an essential raw material in flat glass, container glass, detergents, chemicals, paper and other consumer and industrial products. The vast majority of the world’s accessible trona reserves are located in the Green River Basin. According to historical production statistics, approximately one-quarter of global soda ash is produced by processing trona, with the remainder being produced synthetically through chemical processes. The costs associated with procuring the materials needed for synthetic production are greater than the costs associated with mining trona for trona-based production. In addition, trona-based production consumes less energy and produces fewer undesirable by-products than synthetic production.
Ciner
Wyoming’s Green River Basin surface operations are situated on approximately 880 acres in Wyoming, and its mining operations consist of approximately 23,500 acres of leased and licensed subsurface mining area. The facility is accessible by both road and rail. Ciner Wyoming uses seven large continuous mining machines and 14 underground shuttle cars in its mining operations. Its processing assets consist of material sizing units, conveyors, calciners, dissolver circuits, thickener tanks, drum filters, evaporators and rotary dryers.
The
following map provides an aerial overview of Ciner Wyoming’s surface operations:
In trona ore processing, insoluble materials and other impurities are removed by thickening and filtering liquor, a solution consisting of sodium carbonate dissolved in water. Ciner Wyoming then adds activated carbon to filters to remove organic impurities, which can cause color contamination in the final product. The resulting clear liquid is then crystallized in evaporators, producing sodium carbonate monohydrate. The crystals are then drawn off and passed through a centrifuge to remove excess water. The resulting material is dried in a product dryer to form anhydrous sodium carbonate, or soda ash. The resulting processed soda ash is
then stored in on-site storage silos to await shipment by bulk rail or truck to distributors and end customers. Ciner Wyoming’s storage silos can hold up to 65,000 short tons of processed soda ash at any given time. The facility is in good working condition and has been in service for 57 years.
Deca Rehydration. The evaporation stage of trona ore processing produces a precipitate and natural by-product called deca. "Deca,"
short for sodium carbonate decahydrate, is one part soda ash and ten parts water. Solar evaporation causes deca to crystallize and precipitate to the bottom of the four main surface ponds at the Green River Basin facility. The deca rehydration process enables Ciner Wyoming to recover soda ash from the deca-rich purged liquor as a by-product of the refining process. The soda ash contained in deca is captured by allowing the deca crystals to evaporate in the sun and separating the dehydrated crystals from the soda ash. The separated deca crystals are then blended with partially processed trona ore in the dissolving stage of the production process. This process enables Ciner Wyoming to reduce waste storage needs and convert what is typically a waste product into a usable raw material. Ciner Wyoming anticipates that its current deca stockpiles will be exhausted by 2023 and production rates decline approximately 200,000 short tons per year if that production is not replaced.
Shipping and Logistics. All of the soda ash produced is shipped by rail or truck from the Green River Basin facility. For the year ended December 31, 2019, Ciner Wyoming shipped approximately 96.9% of its soda ash to its customers initially via a single rail line owned and controlled by Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”). The Ciner Wyoming plant receives rail service exclusively from Union Pacific. The agreement with Union Pacific expires on December 31, 2021 and there can be no assurance that it will be renewed on terms favorable to Ciner Wyoming or at all. The rail freight rate charged under the agreement increases annually based on a published
index tied to certain rail industry metrics. Ciner Resources Corporation leases a fleet of more than 2,000 hopper cars that serve as dedicated modes of shipment to its domestic customers. For export, Ciner Wyoming ships soda ash on unit trains consisting of approximately 100 cars to two primary ports located in Texas and Oregon. From these ports, the soda ash is loaded onto ships for delivery to ports all over the world. American Natural Soda Ash Corporation ("ANSAC") currently provides logistics and support services for all of Ciner Wyoming’s export sales. For domestic sales, Ciner Resources Corporation provides similar services.
Customers. Ciner Wyoming’s customers, including end users to whom ANSAC makes sales overseas, consist primarily of glass manufacturing companies, which account for 50% or more of the consumption of soda ash around the
world; and chemical and detergent manufacturing companies. Ciner Wyoming’s largest customer currently is ANSAC, which buys soda ash (through Ciner Resources Corporation, which serves as Ciner Wyoming’s sales agent in its agreement with ANSAC) and other of its member companies for export to its customers. ANSAC accounted for approximately 60% of Ciner Wyoming’s net sales in 2019. ANSAC takes soda ash orders directly from its overseas customers and then purchases soda ash for resale from its member companies pro rata based on each member’s production volumes. ANSAC is the exclusive distributor for its members to the markets it serves. However, Ciner Resources Corporation, on Ciner Wyoming’s behalf, negotiates directly with, and Ciner Wyoming exports to, customers in markets not served by ANSAC.
In November 2018, Ciner Resources Corporation
delivered a notice to terminate the membership in ANSAC, which will be effective as of December 31, 2021. Until the effective termination date, ANSAC will continue to sell Ciner Wyoming’s soda ash to ANSAC-designated overseas territories and continue to provide logistics and support services for Ciner Wyoming’s other export sales. After the termination period, Ciner Resources Corporation will begin marketing soda ash directly into international markets which are currently being served by ANSAC, and Ciner Wyoming intends to utilize the distribution network that has already been established by the global Ciner Group. The ANSAC agreement provides that in the event an ANSAC member exits or the ANSAC cooperative is dissolved, the exiting members are obligated for their respective portion of the residual net assets or deficit of the cooperative. The withdrawal from ANSAC is expected to enable Ciner Wyoming to combine volumes
with Ciner Group’s soda ash exports from Turkey and therefore to leverage the larger, global Ciner Group’s soda ash operations. Ciner Wyoming believes this will eventually lower its cost position and improve its ability to optimize its market share both domestically and internationally. However, initial costs may be higher than costs incurred through ANSAC sales. In addition, Ciner Wyoming will need access to an international logistic infrastructure that includes, among other things, a domestic port for export capabilities. These export capabilities are currently being developed by Ciner Group, and options being evaluated range from continued outsourcing in the near term to developing Ciner Group’s own port capabilities in the longer term. Ciner Wyoming expects to bear a portion of these development costs. See "Item 1A—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—A
significant portion of Ciner Wyoming’s historical international sales of soda ash have been to ANSAC, and the termination of the ANSAC membership could adversely affect Ciner Wyoming’s ability to compete in certain international markets and increase Ciner Wyoming’s international sales costs."
For customers in North America, Ciner Resources typically enters into contracts on Ciner Wyoming’s behalf with terms ranging from one to three years. Under these contracts, customers generally agree to purchase either minimum estimated volumes of soda ash or a certain percentage of their soda ash requirements at a fixed price for a given calendar year. Although Ciner Wyoming does
not have a “take or pay” arrangements with its customers, substantially all sales are made pursuant to written agreements and
not through spot sales. In 2019, Ciner Wyoming had more than 70 domestic customers and has had long-term relationships with the majority of its customers.
Leases and License. Ciner Wyoming is party to several mining leases and one license
for its subsurface mining rights. Some of the leases are renewable at Ciner Wyoming’s option upon expiration. Ciner Wyoming pays royalties to the State of Wyoming, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and Rock Springs Royalty Company, an affiliate of Occidental Petroleum Corporation (formerly an affiliate of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation), which are calculated based upon a percentage of the value of soda ash and related products sold at a certain stage in the mining process. These royalty payments may be subject to a minimum domestic production volume from the Green River Basin facility. Ciner Wyoming is also obligated to pay annual rentals to its lessors and licensor regardless of actual sales. In addition, Ciner Wyoming pays a production tax to Sweetwater County, and trona severance tax to the State of Wyoming that is calculated based on a formula that utilizes the volume of trona ore mined and the value of the soda ash produced.
Expansion
Project. Ciner Wyoming has announced a significant capacity expansion capital project that would increase production levels to up to 3.5 million tons of soda ash per year. Ciner Wyoming has conducted the initial basic design and is currently evaluating and pursuing the related permits and detailed cost analysis pursuant to the basic design. This project will require capital expenditures materially higher than have been incurred by Ciner Wyoming over the past few years, and Ciner Wyoming intends to fund the project in part by reinvesting cash that would otherwise be distributed to its partners. In the third quarter of 2019, Ciner Wyoming significantly reduced its cash distributions to its partners, and we expect for cash distributions from Ciner Wyoming to remain at approximately $25 million to $28 million per year until the project is funded. However, the costs of the expansion project could be higher than expected, or the execution of the project
could be substantially delayed, which could materially impact Ciner Wyoming’s profitability and result in a further reduction of cash distributions to us. See "Item 1A—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Significant delays and/or higher than expected costs associated with Ciner Wyoming’s capacity expansion project could adversely affect Ciner Wyoming’s profitability and ability to make distributions to us."
As a minority interest owner in Ciner Wyoming, we do not operate and are not involved in the day-to-day operation of the trona ore mine or soda ash production plant. Our partner, Ciner Resources LP, manages the mining and plant operations. We appoint three of the seven members of the Board of Managers of Ciner Wyoming and have
certain limited negative controls relating to the company.
Significant Customers
We have a significant concentration of revenues with Foresight Energy and its subsidiaries, with total revenues of $58.9 million in 2019 from four different mining operations, including transportation and processing services revenues, coal overriding royalty revenues and wheelage revenues. We also have a significant concentration of revenues from Contura Energy, with total revenues of $40.7 million
in 2019 from several different mining operations, including wheelage revenues. For additional information on significant customers, refer to "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 15. Major Customers."
Competition
We face competition from land companies, coal producers, international steel companies and private equity firms in purchasing coal reserves and royalty producing properties. Numerous producers in the coal industry make coal marketing intensely competitive. Our lessees compete among themselves and with coal producers in various regions of the United States for domestic sales.
Lessees compete with both large and small producers nationwide on the basis of coal price at the mine, coal quality, transportation cost from the mine to the customer and the reliability of supply. Continued demand for our coal and the prices that our lessees obtain are also affected by demand for electricity and steel, as well as government regulations, technological developments and the availability and the cost of generating power from alternative fuel sources, including nuclear, natural gas, wind, solar and hydroelectric power.
Ciner
Wyoming's trona mining and soda ash refinery business faces competition from a number of soda ash producers in the United States, Europe and Asia, some of which have greater market share and greater financial, production and other resources than Ciner Wyoming does. Some of Ciner Wyoming’s competitors are diversified global corporations that have many lines of business and some have greater capital resources and may be in a better position to withstand a long-term deterioration in the soda ash market. Other competitors, even if smaller in size, may have greater experience and stronger relationships in their local markets. Competitive pressures could make it more difficult for Ciner Wyoming to retain its existing customers and attract new customers, and could also intensify the negative impact of factors that decrease demand for soda ash in the markets it serves, such as adverse economic conditions, weather, higher fuel costs and taxes or other governmental or regulatory
actions that directly or indirectly increase the cost or limit the use of soda ash.
Title to Property
We owned substantially all of our coal and aggregates reserves in fee as of December 31, 2019. We lease the remainder from unaffiliated third parties. Ciner Wyoming leases or licenses its trona reserves. We believe that we have satisfactory title to all of our mineral properties, but we have not had a qualified title company confirm this belief. Although title to these properties is subject to encumbrances in certain cases, such as customary easements, rights-of-way, interests generally retained in connection with the acquisition of real property, licenses, prior reservations, leases, liens, restrictions and other encumbrances, we believe
that none of these burdens will materially detract from the value of our properties or from our interest in them or will materially interfere with their use in the operation of our business.
For most of our properties, the surface, oil and gas and mineral or coal estates are not owned by the same entities. Some of those entities are our affiliates. State law and regulations in most of the states where we do business require the oil and gas owner to coordinate the location of wells so as to minimize the impact on the intervening coal seams. We do not anticipate that the existence of the severed estates will materially impede development of the minerals on our properties.
Regulation and Environmental Matters
General
Operations
on our properties must be conducted in compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. These laws and regulations include matters involving the discharge of materials into the environment, employee health and safety, mine permits and other licensing requirements, reclamation and restoration of mining properties after mining is completed, management of materials generated by mining operations, surface subsidence from underground mining, water pollution, legislatively mandated benefits for current and retired coal miners, air quality standards, protection of wetlands, plant and wildlife protection, limitations on land use, storage of petroleum products and substances which are regarded as hazardous under applicable laws and management of electrical equipment containing polychlorinated biphenyls ("PCBs"). Because of extensive, comprehensive and often ambiguous regulatory requirements, violations during natural resource extraction operations
are not unusual and, notwithstanding compliance efforts, we do not believe violations can be eliminated entirely.
While it is not possible to quantify the costs of compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, those costs have been and are expected to continue to be significant. Our lessees in our coal and aggregates royalty businesses are required to post performance bonds pursuant to federal and state mining laws and regulations for the estimated costs of reclamation and mine closures, including the cost of treating mine water discharge when necessary. In many states our lessees also pay taxes into reclamation funds that states use to achieve reclamation where site specific performance bonds are inadequate to do so. Determinations by federal or state agencies that site specific bonds or state reclamation funds are inadequate could result in increased
bonding costs for our lessees or even a cessation of operations if adequate levels of bonding cannot be maintained. We do not accrue for reclamation costs because our lessees are both contractually liable and liable under the permits they hold for all costs relating to their mining operations, including the costs of reclamation and mine closures. Although the lessees typically accrue adequate amounts for these costs, their future operating results would be adversely affected if they later determined these accruals to be insufficient. In recent years, compliance with these laws and regulations has substantially increased the cost of coal mining for all domestic coal producers.
In
addition, the electric utility industry, which is the most significant end-user of thermal coal, is subject to extensive regulation regarding the environmental impact of its power generation activities, which has affected and is expected to continue to affect demand for coal mined from our properties. Current and future proposed legislation and regulations could be adopted that will have a significant additional impact on the mining operations of our lessees or their customers’ ability to use coal and may require our lessees or their customers to change operations significantly or incur additional substantial costs that would negatively impact the coal industry.
Many of the statutes discussed below also apply to Ciner Wyoming’s trona mining and soda ash production operations, and therefore we do not present a separate discussion of statutes related to those activities, except
where appropriate.
Air Emissions
The Clean Air Act and corresponding state and local laws and regulations affect all aspects of our business. The Clean Air Act directly impacts our lessees’ coal mining and processing operations by imposing permitting requirements and, in some cases, requirements to install certain emissions control equipment, on sources that emit various hazardous and non-hazardous air pollutants. The Clean Air Act also indirectly affects coal mining operations by extensively regulating the air emissions of coal-fired electric power generating plants. There have been a series of federal rulemakings that are focused on emissions from coal-fired electric generating facilities, including the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule ("CSAPR"), regulating emissions of nitrogen
oxide and sulfur dioxide, and the Mercury and Air Toxics Rule ("MATS"), regulating emissions of hazardous air pollutants. Installation of additional emissions control technologies and other measures required under these and other U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") regulations make it more costly to operate coal-fired power plants and could make coal a less attractive or even effectively prohibited fuel source in the planning, building and operation of power plants in the future. These rules and regulations have resulted in a reduction in coal’s share of power generating capacity, which has negatively impacted our lessees’ ability to sell coal and our coal-related revenues. Further reductions in coal’s share of power generating capacity as a result of compliance with existing or proposed rules and regulations would have a material adverse effect on our coal-related revenues.
Carbon
Dioxide and Greenhouse Gas ("GHG") Emissions
In December 2009, EPA determined that emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and other GHGs present an endangerment to public health and welfare because emissions of such gases are, according to EPA, contributing to warming of the Earth’s atmosphere and other climatic changes. Based on its findings, EPA began adopting and implementing regulations to restrict emissions of GHGs under various provisions of the Clean Air Act.
In August 2015, EPA published its final Clean Power Plan ("CPP") Rule, a multi-factor plan designed to cut carbon pollution from existing power plants, including coal-fired power plants. The rule required improving the heat rate of existing coal-fired power plants and substituting lower carbon-emission sources
like natural gas and renewables in place of coal. As promulgated, the rule would force many existing coal-fired power plants to incur substantial costs in order to comply or alternatively result in the closure of some of these plants, likely resulting in a material adverse effect on the demand for coal by electric power generators. The rule was being challenged by several states, industry participants and other parties in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. In February 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States stayed the CPP Rule pending a decision by the District of Columbia Circuit as well as any subsequent review by the Supreme Court. In April 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted EPA’s motion to hold the litigation in abeyance. In December 2017, EPA issued a proposed rule repealing the CPP Rule and issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking soliciting information regarding
a potential replacement rule to the CPP Rule. In August 2018, EPA formally proposed the Affordable Clean Energy ("ACE") Rule, which would replace the CPP Rule. The ACE Rule contemplates a narrower approach than the CPP Rule, focusing on efficiency improvements at existing power plants and eliminating the CPP Rule’s broader goals that envisioned switches to non-fossil fuel energy sources and the implementation of efficiency measures on demand-side entities, which the EPA now considers beyond the reach of its authority under the Clean Air Act. The ACE Rule would also omit specific numerical emissions targets that had been established under the CPP Rule. The ACE Rule went into effect on September 6, 2019. As a result, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit dismissed the pending challenges to the CPP Rule as moot. The ACE Rule has been challenged by public health groups, environmental
groups, and a coalition of twenty-two states and six municipalities; various industry groups and power providers have sought to intervene.
In October 2015, EPA published its final rule on performance standards for greenhouse gas emissions from new, modified, and reconstructed electric generating units. The final rule requires new steam generating units to use highly efficient supercritical pulverized coal boilers that use partial post-combustion carbon capture
and storage technology. The final emission standard is less stringent than EPA had originally proposed due to updated cost assumptions, but could still have a material adverse effect on new coal-fired power plants. The final rule has been challenged by several states, industry participants and other parties in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, but is not subject to a stay. In April 2017, the court granted EPA’s motion to hold the litigation in abeyance while EPA reviews the rule.
President Obama also announced an emission reduction agreement with China’s President Xi Jinping in November 2014. The United States pledged that by 2025 it would cut climate pollution by 26% to 28% from 2005 levels. China pledged it would reach its peak carbon dioxide emissions around 2030 or earlier, and increase its non-fossil fuel share of energy to around 20%
by 2030. In December 2015, the United States was one of 196 countries that participated in the Paris Climate Conference, at which the participants agreed to limit their emissions in order to limit global warming to 2°C above pre-industrial levels, with an aspirational goal of 1.5°C. While there is no way to estimate the impact of these climate pledges and agreements, they could ultimately have an adverse effect on the demand for coal, both nationally and internationally, if implemented. In 2019, President Trump withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement.
Hazardous Materials and Waste
The Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA" or the Superfund law) and analogous state laws impose liability, without regard to fault or the legality
of the original conduct, on certain classes of persons that are considered to have contributed to the release of a “hazardous substance” into the environment. We could become liable under federal and state Superfund and waste management statutes if our lessees are unable to pay environmental cleanup costs relating to hazardous substances. In addition, we may have liability for environmental clean-up costs in connection with Ciner Wyoming's soda ash businesses.
Water Discharges
Operations conducted on our properties can result in discharges of pollutants into waters. The Clean Water Act and analogous state laws and regulations create two permitting programs for mining operations. The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program under Section 402 of the statute
is administered by the states or EPA and regulates the concentrations of pollutants in discharges of waste and storm water from a mine site. The Section 404 program is administered by the Army Corps of Engineers and regulates the placement of overburden and fill material into channels, streams and wetlands that comprise “waters of the United States.” The scope of waters that may fall within the jurisdictional reach of the Clean Water Act is expansive and may include land features not commonly understood to be a stream or wetlands. The Clean Water Act and its regulations prohibit the unpermitted discharge of pollutants into such waters, including those from a spill or leak. Similarly, Section 404 also prohibits discharges of fill material and certain other activities in waters unless authorized by the issued permit. In June 2015, EPA issued a new rule defining the scope of “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) that are subject to regulation. The 2015 WOTUS
rule was challenged by a number of states and private parties in federal district and circuit courts. In December 2017, EPA and the Corps proposed a rule to repeal the 2015 WOTUS rule and implement the pre-2015 definition. The repeal of the 2015 WOTUS rule took effect in December 2019. In December 2018, EPA and the Corps issued a proposed rule again revising the definition of “Waters of the United States.” In January 2020, EPA and the Corps announced that the 2018 proposed rule was final. The repeal of the 2015 WOTUS rule and implementation of the pre-2015 rule have been challenged in federal courts, and the 2020 final WOTUS rule will likely be challenged as well.
In connection with its review of permits, EPA has at times sought to reduce the size of fills and to impose limits on specific conductance (conductivity) and sulfate at levels that can be unachievable absent
treatment at many mines. Such actions by EPA could make it more difficult or expensive to obtain or comply with such permits, which could, in turn, have an adverse effect on our coal-related revenues.
In addition to government action, private citizens’ groups have continued to be active in bringing lawsuits against operators and landowners. Since 2012, several citizen group lawsuits have been filed against mine operators for allegedly violating conditions
in their National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permits requiring compliance with West Virginia’s water quality standards. Some of the lawsuits alleged violations of water quality standards for selenium, whereas others alleged that discharges of conductivity and sulfate were causing violations of West Virginia’s narrative water quality standards, which generally prohibit adverse effects to aquatic life. The citizen suit groups have sought penalties as well as injunctive relief that would limit future discharges of selenium, conductivity or sulfate. The federal district court for the Southern District of West Virginia has ruled in favor of the citizen suit groups in multiple suits alleging violations of the water quality standard for selenium and in two suits alleging violations of water quality standards due to discharges of conductivity (one of which was upheld on appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in January
2017). Additional rulings requiring operators to reduce their discharges of selenium, conductivity or sulfate could result in large treatment expenses for our lessees. In 2015, the West Virginia Legislature enacted certain changes to West Virginia’s NPDES program to expressly prohibit the direct enforcement of water quality standards against permit holders. EPA approved those changes as a program revision effective March 27, 2019. This approval may prevent future citizen suits alleging violations of water quality standards.
Since 2013, several citizen group lawsuits have been filed against landowners alleging ongoing discharges of pollutants, including selenium and conductivity, from valley fills located at reclaimed mountaintop removal mining sites in West Virginia. In each case, the mine on the subject property has been closed,
the property has been reclaimed, and the state reclamation bond has been released. Any determination that a landowner or lessee has liability for discharges from a previously reclaimed mine site could result in substantial compliance costs or fines and would result in uncertainty as to continuing liability for completed and reclaimed coal mine operations.
Other Regulations Affecting the Mining Industry
Mine Health and Safety Laws
The operations of our coal lessees and Ciner Wyoming are subject to stringent health and safety standards that have been imposed by federal legislation since the adoption of the Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969. The Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969 resulted in increased
operating costs and reduced productivity. The Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, which significantly expanded the enforcement of health and safety standards of the Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, imposes comprehensive health and safety standards on all mining operations. In addition, the Black Lung Acts require payments of benefits by all businesses conducting current mining operations to coal miners with black lung or pneumoconiosis and to some beneficiaries of miners who have died from this disease.
Mining accidents in recent years have received national attention and instigated responses at the state and national level that have resulted in increased scrutiny of current safety practices and procedures at all mining operations, particularly underground mining operations. Since 2006, heightened scrutiny has been applied to the safe operations of both underground and surface
mines. This increased level of review has resulted in an increase in the civil penalties that mine operators have been assessed for non-compliance. Operating companies and their supervisory employees have also been subject to criminal convictions. The Mine Safety and Health Administration ("MSHA") has also advised mine operators that it will be more aggressive in placing mines in the Pattern of Violations program, if a mine’s rate of injuries or significant and substantial citations exceed a certain threshold. A mine that is placed in a Pattern of Violations program will receive additional scrutiny from MSHA.
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 ("SMCRA") and similar statutes enacted and enforced by the
states impose on mine operators the responsibility of reclaiming the land and compensating the landowner for types of damages occurring as a result of mining operations. To ensure compliance with any reclamation obligations, mine operators are required to post performance bonds. Our coal lessees are contractually obligated under the terms of our leases to comply with all federal, state and local laws, including SMCRA. Upon completion of the mining, reclamation generally is completed by seeding with grasses or planting trees for use as pasture or timberland, as specified in the reclamation plan approved by the state regulatory authority. In addition, higher and better uses of the reclaimed property are encouraged.
Mining Permits and Approvals
Numerous governmental permits or approvals such as those required by SMCRA and the Clean Water Act are required for mining operations. In connection with obtaining these permits and approvals, our lessees may be required to prepare and present to federal, state or local authorities data pertaining to the effect or impact that any proposed production of coal may have upon the environment. The requirements imposed by any of these authorities may be costly and time consuming and may delay commencement or continuation of mining operations.
In
order to obtain mining permits and approvals from state regulatory authorities, mine operators, including our lessees, must submit a reclamation plan for reclaiming the mined property upon the completion of mining operations. Our lessees have obtained or applied for permits to mine a majority of the reserves that are currently planned to be mined over the next five years. Our lessees are also in the planning phase for obtaining permits for the additional reserves planned to be mined over the following five years. However, given the imposition of new requirements in the permits in the form of policies and the increased oversight review that has been exercised by EPA, there are no assurances that they will not experience difficulty and delays in obtaining mining permits in the future. In addition, EPA has used its authority to create significant delays in the issuance of new permits and the modification of existing permits, which has led to substantial delays and increased
costs for coal operators.
Employees and Labor Relations
As of December 31, 2019, affiliates of our general partner employed 56 people who directly supported our operations. None of these employees were subject to a collective bargaining agreement.
Website Access to Partnership Reports
Our Internet address is www.nrplp.com.
We make available free of charge on or through our Internet website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information on our website is not a part of this report. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information filed by us.
Corporate Governance
Matters
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our Disclosure Controls and Procedures Policy and our Corporate Governance Guidelines adopted by our Board of Directors, as well as the charter for our Audit Committee are available on our website at www.nrplp.com. Copies of our annual report, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our Disclosure Controls and Procedures Policy, our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our committee charters will be made available upon written request to our principal executive office at 1201 Louisiana St., Suite 3400, Houston,
Texas 77002.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Risks Related to Our Business
Cash
distributions are not guaranteed and may fluctuate with our performance and the establishment of financial reserves. In addition, our debt agreements and our partnership agreement place restrictions on our ability to pay, and in some cases raise, the quarterly distribution under certain circumstances.
Because distributions on the common units are dependent on the amount of cash we generate, distributions fluctuate based on our performance. The actual amount of cash that is available to be distributed each quarter depends on numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control and the control of the general partner. Cash distributions are dependent primarily on cash flow, and not solely on profitability, which is affected by non-cash items. Therefore, cash distributions might be made during periods when we record losses and might not be made during periods when we record profits.
The actual amount of cash we have to distribute each quarter is reduced by payments in respect of debt service and other contractual obligations, including distributions on the preferred units, fixed charges, maintenance capital expenditures and reserves for future operating or capital needs that the board of directors may determine are appropriate. We have significant debt service obligations and obligations to pay cash distributions on our preferred units. To the extent our board of directors deems appropriate, it may determine to decrease the amount of the quarterly distribution on our common units or suspend or eliminate the distribution on our common units altogether. In addition, because our unitholders are required to pay income taxes on their respective shares of our taxable income, our unitholders may be required to pay taxes in excess of any future distributions we make. Our unitholders' share of our portfolio income may be taxable to them even though they
receive other losses from our activities. See "—Tax Risks to Our Unitholders—Our unitholders are required to pay taxes on their share of our income even if they do not receive any cash distributions from us. Our unitholders' share of our portfolio income may be taxable to them even though they receive other losses from our activities."
The agreements governing our indebtedness and preferred units restrict our ability to raise, and in some cases continue to pay, distributions on our common units. Opco’s revolving credit agreement, the indenture governing our 2025 Senior Notes and our partnership agreement each require that we meet certain consolidated leverage tests in order to raise our quarterly distribution on the common units above the current level of $0.45 per quarter. The maximum
leverage covenant under Opco’s revolving credit facility will step down permanently from 4.0x to 3.0x if we increase the common unit distribution above the current level of $0.45 per common unit per quarter. In addition, under our partnership agreement, to the extent we have paid any distributions on the preferred units in kind ("PIK units") and such PIK units are still outstanding at any time after January 1, 2022, we will be prohibited from making any distributions with respect to our common units until we have redeemed all such PIK units in cash. For more information on restrictions on our ability to make distributions on our common units, see "Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources" and
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 12. Debt, Net."
Our leverage and debt service obligations may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.
As of December 31, 2019, we and our subsidiaries had approximately $524.1 million of total indebtedness. The terms and conditions governing the indenture
for NRP’s 2025 Senior Notes and Opco’s revolving credit facility and senior notes: | |
• | require us to meet certain leverage and interest coverage ratios; |
| |
• | require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to service our existing debt, thereby reducing the cash available to finance our operations and other business activities and could limit our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in our business and the industries in which we operate; |
| |
• | increase
our vulnerability to economic downturns and adverse developments in our business; |
| |
• | limit our ability to access the bank and capital markets to raise capital on favorable terms or to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures or acquisitions or to refinance existing indebtedness; |
| |
• | place restrictions on our ability to obtain additional financing, make investments, lease equipment, sell assets and engage in business combinations; |
| |
• | place us at a competitive disadvantage relative to competitors with lower levels of indebtedness in relation to their overall size or less restrictive terms governing their indebtedness; |
| |
• | make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations under our debt agreements and increase the risk that we may default on our debt obligations; and |
| |
• | limit
management’s discretion in operating our business. |
Our ability to meet our expenses and debt obligations will depend on our future performance, which will be affected by financial, business, economic, regulatory and other factors. We will not be able to control many of these factors, such as economic conditions and governmental regulation. We cannot be certain that our cash flow will be sufficient to allow us to pay the principal and interest on our debt and meet our other obligations, including payment of distributions on the preferred units. If we do not have sufficient funds, we may be required to refinance all or part of our existing debt, borrow more money, or sell assets or raise equity at unattractive prices, including higher interest rates. We are required to make substantial principal repayments each year in connection with Opco’s senior notes, with
approximately $46 million due thereunder during 2020. To the extent we borrow to make some of these payments, we may not be able to refinance these amounts on terms acceptable to us, if at all. We may not be able to refinance our debt, sell assets, borrow more money or access the bank and capital markets on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Our ability to comply with the financial and other restrictive covenants in our debt agreements will be affected by the levels of cash flow from our operations and future events and circumstances beyond our control. Failure to comply with these covenants would result in an event of default under our indebtedness, and such an event of default could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In July 2017, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority announced that it intends to stop persuading or compelling banks
to submit LIBOR rates after 2021. Opco’s revolving credit facility includes provisions to determine a replacement rate for LIBOR if necessary during its term, which provide that we will adopt a replacement rate that is broadly accepted by the syndicated loan market. We currently do not expect the transition from LIBOR to have a material impact on us. However, if clear market standards and replacement methodologies have not developed as of the time LIBOR becomes unavailable, we may have difficulty establishing a replacement rate under Opco’s revolving credit facility. In the event that we do not determine a replacement rate for LIBOR, in certain circumstances, Eurodollar Loans under Opco’s revolving credit facility may be suspended and converted to ABR Loans, which could bear higher interest rates. If we are unable to negotiate replacement rates on favorable terms, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For a description
of the interest rate on borrowings under Opco’s revolving credit facility, see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 12. Debt, Net.”
Prices for both metallurgical and thermal coal are volatile and depend on a number of factors beyond our control. Declines in prices could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Coal prices continue to be volatile and prices could decline substantially from current levels. Production by some of our lessees may not be economic if prices decline further or remain at current levels. The prices our lessees receive for their coal depend upon factors beyond their or our
control, including:
| |
• | the supply of and demand for domestic and foreign coal; |
| |
• | domestic and foreign governmental regulations and taxes; |
| |
• | changes in fuel consumption patterns of electric power generators; |
| |
• | the
price and availability of alternative fuels, especially natural gas; |
| |
• | global economic conditions, including the strength of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies; |
| |
• | global and domestic demand for steel; |
| |
• | tariff rates on imports and trade disputes, particularly involving the United States
and China; |
| |
• | the availability of, proximity to and capacity of transportation networks and facilities; |
| |
• | global or national health concerns, including the outbreak of pandemic or contagious disease, such as the recent coronavirus; |
| |
• | the
effect of worldwide energy conservation measures. |
Natural gas is the primary fuel that competes with thermal coal for power generation, and renewable energy sources continue to gain market share in power generation. The abundance and ready availability of cheap natural gas, together with increased governmental regulations on the power generation industry has caused a number of utilities to switch from thermal coal to natural gas and/or close
coal-powered generation plants. This switching has resulted in a decline in thermal coal prices, and to the extent that natural gas prices remain low, thermal coal prices will also remain low. Reduced international demand for export thermal coal and increased competition from global producers has also put downward pressure on thermal coal prices.
Our lessees produce a significant amount of metallurgical coal that is used for steel production domestically and internationally. Since the amount of steel that is produced is tied to global economic conditions, declines in those conditions could result in the decline of steel, coke and metallurgical coal production. Since metallurgical coal is priced higher than thermal coal, some mines on our properties may only operate profitably if all or a portion of their production is sold as metallurgical coal. If these mines are unable to sell
metallurgical coal, they may not be economically viable and may be temporarily idled or closed. Any potential future lessee bankruptcy filings could create additional uncertainty as to the future of operations on our properties and could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
To the extent our lessees are unable to economically produce coal over the long term, the carrying value of our reserves could be adversely affected. A long-term asset generally is deemed impaired when the future expected cash flow from its use and disposition is less than its book value. For the fourth quarter of 2019, we recorded an impairment charge of approximately $148 million related to properties that we believe our current or future lessees are unable to operate profitably. Future impairment analyses could result in
additional downward adjustments to the carrying value of our assets.
We derive a large percentage of our revenues and other income from a small number of coal lessees.
Challenges in the coal mining industry have led to significant consolidation activity. We own significant interests in all four of Foresight Energy’s mining operations, which accounted for approximately 23% of our total revenues in 2019. We also own significant interests in several of Contura Energy's mining operations, which accounted for approximately 16% of our total revenues in 2019. Certain other lessees have made acquisitions over the past few years resulting in their having an increased interest in our coal reserves. Any
interruption in these lessees’ ability to make royalty payments to us could have a disproportionate material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Bankruptcies in the coal industry, and/or the idling or closure of mines on our properties could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
The current coal price environment, together with high operating costs and limited access to capital, has caused a number of coal producers to file for protection under U.S. bankruptcy and/or idle or close mines that they cannot operate profitably. To the extent our leases are accepted or assigned in a bankruptcy process, pre-petition amounts are required to be cured in full, but we may ultimately make concessions in the financial terms of those leases
in order for the reorganized company or new lessor to operate profitably going forward. To the extent our leases are rejected, operations on those leases will cease, and we will be unlikely to recover the full amount of our rejection damages claims. More of our lessees may file for bankruptcy in the future, which will create additional uncertainty as to the future of operations on our properties and could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Foresight Energy, which is our largest lessee, is currently working with its lenders and contract counterparties to evaluate restructuring options, which could result in the idling or closure of one or more of its mines or changes in lease terms. To the extent Foresight determines to idle operations on our properties for a prolonged period or to shut any of its mines on our properties down permanently,
or to the extent we agree to amend the terms of our leases with them to facilitate their continued operations on our properties, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Mining operations are subject to operating risks that could result in lower revenues to us.
Our revenues are largely dependent on the level of production of minerals from our properties, and any interruptions to or increases in costs of the production from our properties may reduce our revenues. The level of production and costs thereof are subject to operating conditions or events beyond our or our lessees’ control including:
| |
• | difficulties
or delays in acquiring necessary permits or mining or surface rights; |
| |
• | reclamation costs and bonding costs; |
| |
• | changes or variations in geologic conditions, such as the thickness of the mineral deposits and the amount of rock embedded in or overlying the mineral deposit; |
| |
• | mining and processing equipment failures and unexpected maintenance problems; |
| |
• | the availability of equipment or parts and increased costs related thereto; |
| |
• | the
availability of transportation networks and facilities and interruptions due to transportation delays; |
| |
• | adverse weather and natural disasters, such as heavy rains and flooding; |
| |
• | labor-related interruptions and trained personnel shortages; and |
| |
• | mine safety incidents or accidents, including hazardous
conditions, roof falls, fires and explosions. |
While our lessees maintain insurance coverage, there is no assurance that insurance will be available or cover the costs of these risks. Many of our lessees are experiencing rising costs related to regulatory compliance, insurance coverage, permitting and bonding, transportation, and labor. Increased costs result in decreased profitability for our lessees and reduce the competitiveness of coal as a fuel source. In addition, we and our lessees may also incur costs and liabilities resulting from third-party claims for damages to property or injury to persons arising from their operations. The occurrence of any of these events or conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
The adoption of climate change legislation and regulations
restricting emissions of greenhouse gases and other hazardous air pollutants have resulted in changes in fuel consumption patterns by electric power generators and a corresponding decrease in coal production by our lessees and reduced coal-related revenues.
Enactment of laws and passage of regulations regarding emissions from the combustion of coal by the U.S., some of its states or other countries, or other actions to limit such emissions, have resulted in and could continue to result in electricity generators switching from coal to other fuel sources and in coal-fueled power plant closures. Further, regulations regarding new coal-fueled power plants could adversely impact the global demand for coal. The potential financial impact on us of existing and future laws, regulations or other policies will depend upon the degree to which any such laws or regulations force electricity
generators to diminish their reliance on coal as a fuel source. The amount of coal consumed for domestic electric power generation is affected primarily by the overall demand for electricity, the price and availability of competing fuels for power plants and environmental and other governmental regulations. We expect that substantially all newly constructed power plants in the United States will be fired by natural gas because of lower construction and compliance costs compared to coal-fired plants and because natural gas is a cleaner burning fuel. The increasingly stringent requirements of rules and regulations promulgated under the federal Clean Air Act have resulted in more electric power generators shifting from coal to natural-gas-fired power plants, or to other alternative energy sources such as solar and wind. These changes have resulted in reduced coal consumption and the production of coal from our properties and are expected to continue to have an adverse effect
on our coal-related revenues.
In addition to EPA’s greenhouse gas initiatives, there are several other federal rulemakings that are focused on emissions from coal-fired electric generating facilities, including the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR), regulating emissions of nitrogen oxide and sulfur dioxide, and the Mercury and Air Toxics Rule (MATS), regulating emissions of hazardous air pollutants. Installation of additional emissions control technologies and other measures required under these and other EPA regulations have made it more costly to operate many coal-fired power plants and have resulted in and are expected to continue to result in plant closures. Further reductions in coal’s share of power generating capacity as a result of compliance with existing or proposed rules and regulations would have a material adverse effect on our coal-related revenues. For more
information on regulation of greenhouse gas and other air pollutant emissions, see "Items 1. and 2. Business and Properties—Regulation and Environmental Matters.”
Concerns about the environmental impacts of coal combustion, including perceived impacts on global climate issues, are also resulting in unfavorable lending and investment policies by institutions and insurance companies which could significantly affect our ability to raise capital or maintain current insurance levels.
Global climate issues continue to attract public and scientific attention. Numerous reports have engendered concern about the impacts of human activity, especially fossil
fuel combustion, on global climate issues. In addition to government regulation of greenhouse gas and other air pollutant emissions, there have also been efforts in recent years affecting the investment community, including investment advisors, sovereign wealth funds, public pension funds, universities and other groups, promoting the divestment of fossil fuel equities and also pressuring lenders to limit funding to companies engaged in the extraction of fossil fuels, such as coal. The impact of such efforts may adversely affect our ability to raise capital. In addition, a number of insurance companies have taken action to limit coverage for companies in the coal industry, which could result in significant increases in our costs of insurance or in our inability to maintain insurance coverage at current levels.
In addition to climate change and other Clean Air Act legislation, our businesses are subject to numerous other federal, state and local laws and regulations that may limit production from our properties and our profitability.
The operations of our lessees and Ciner Wyoming are subject to stringent health and safety standards under increasingly strict federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws, including mine safety regulations and governmental enforcement policies. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of cleanup and site restoration
costs and liens, the issuance of injunctions to limit or cease operations, the suspension or revocation of permits and other enforcement measures that could have the effect of limiting production from our properties.
New environmental legislation, new regulations and new interpretations of existing environmental laws, including regulations governing permitting requirements, could further regulate or tax mining industries and may also require significant changes to operations, the incurrence of increased costs or the requirement to obtain new or different permits, any of which could decrease our revenues and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. Under SMCRA, our coal lessees have substantial reclamation obligations on properties where mining operations have been completed and are required to post performance bonds for their reclamation
obligations. To the extent an operator is unable to satisfy its reclamation obligations or the performance bonds posted are not sufficient to cover those obligations, regulatory authorities or citizens groups could attempt to shift reclamation liability onto the ultimate landowner, which if successful, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
In addition to governmental regulation, private citizens’ groups have continued to be active in bringing lawsuits against coal mine operators and land owners that allege violations of water quality standards resulting from ongoing discharges of pollutants from reclaimed mining operations, including selenium and conductivity. Any determination that a landowner or lessee has liability for discharges from a previously reclaimed mine site would result in uncertainty as to continuing liability for completed and reclaimed
coal mine operations and could result in substantial compliance costs or fines.
Prices for soda ash are volatile. Any substantial or extended decline in soda ash prices could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
The market price of soda ash directly affects the profitability of Ciner Wyoming’s soda ash production operations. If the market price for soda ash declines, Ciner Wyoming’s sales will decrease. Historically, the global market and, to a lesser extent, the domestic market for soda ash have been volatile, and those markets are likely to remain volatile in the future. The prices Ciner Wyoming receives for its soda ash depend on numerous factors beyond Ciner Wyoming’s control, including worldwide and regional economic and political conditions impacting supply and
demand. Glass manufacturers and other industrial customers drive most of the demand for soda ash, and these customers experience significant fluctuations in demand and production costs. Competition from increased use of glass substitutes, such as plastic and recycled glass, has had a negative effect on demand for soda ash. Substantial or extended declines in prices for soda ash could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, Ciner Wyoming relies on natural gas as the main energy source in its soda ash production process. Accordingly, high natural gas prices increase Ciner Wyoming’s cost of production and affect its competitive cost position when compared to other foreign and domestic soda ash producers.
If our lessees do not manage their operations well, their production volumes and our royalty revenues could decrease.
We
depend on our lessees to effectively manage their operations on our properties. Our lessees make their own business decisions with respect to their operations within the constraints of their leases, including decisions relating to:
| |
• | the payment of minimum royalties; |
| |
• | marketing of the minerals mined; |
| |
• | mine
plans, including the amount to be mined and the method and timing of mining activities; |
| |
• | processing and blending minerals; |
| |
• | expansion plans and capital expenditures; |
| |
• | credit risk of their customers; |
| |
• | insurance and surety bonding; |
| |
• | acquisition of surface rights and other mineral estates; |
| |
• | transportation
arrangements; |
| |
• | compliance with applicable laws, including environmental laws; and |
| |
• | mine closure and reclamation. |
A failure on the part of one of our lessees to make royalty payments, including minimum royalty payments, could give us the right to terminate the lease, repossess the property and enforce payment obligations under the lease. If we repossessed any of our properties, we would seek a replacement lessee.
We might not be able to find a replacement lessee and, if we did, we might not be able to enter into a new lease on favorable terms within a reasonable period of time. In addition, the existing lessee could be subject to bankruptcy proceedings that could further delay the execution of a new lease or the assignment of the existing lease to another operator. If we enter into a new lease, the replacement operator might not achieve the same levels of production or sell minerals at the same price as the lessee it replaced. In addition, it may be difficult for us to secure new or replacement lessees for small or isolated mineral reserves.
We are exposed to operating risks that we do not experience in the royalty business through our soda ash joint venture and through our ownership of certain coal transportation assets.
We
do not have control over the operations of Ciner Wyoming. We have limited approval rights with respect to Ciner Wyoming, and our partner controls most business decisions, including decisions with respect to distributions and capital expenditures. Adverse developments in Ciner Wyoming’s business, including increased maintenance and expansion capital expenditures that we may be required to fund, would result in decreased distributions to NRP. In addition, we are ultimately responsible for operating the transportation infrastructure at Foresight Energy’s Williamson mine, and have assumed the capital and operating risks associated with that business. As a result of these investments, we could experience increased costs as well as increased liability exposure associated with operating these facilities.
A significant portion of Ciner Wyoming’s historical international sales of soda
ash have been to ANSAC, and the termination of the ANSAC membership could adversely affect Ciner Wyoming’s ability to compete in certain international markets and increase Ciner Wyoming’s international sales costs.
ANSAC has historically been Ciner Wyoming’s largest customer for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, accounting for 60%, 52% and 45%, respectively, of its net sales. Following termination of the membership in ANSAC, which will be effective December 31, 2021, there is no assurance that Ciner Wyoming will be able to retain existing foreign customers or secure new foreign customers or the related logistics arrangements on favorable terms. The costs to transport
and market soda ash following the ANSAC exit could be higher than costs associated with sales through ANSAC. In addition, Ciner Wyoming will need access to an international logistic infrastructure that includes, among other things, a domestic port for export capabilities. These export capabilities are currently being developed by Ciner Group, and options being evaluated range from continued outsourcing in the near term to developing Ciner Group’s own port capabilities in the longer term. There can be no assurance that sufficient export capacity will be obtained. In addition, the costs associated with a domestic export terminal could be higher than expected. Adverse developments in Ciner Wyoming’s ability to export soda ash and sell into the foreign markets currently served by ANSAC could result in lower cash distributions to us from Ciner Wyoming.
Significant delays and/or
higher than expected costs associated with Ciner Wyoming’s capacity expansion project could adversely affect Ciner Wyoming’s profitability and ability to make distributions to us.
Ciner Wyoming has announced a significant capacity expansion capital project intended to increase production levels to up to 3.5 million tons of soda ash per year. This project will require capital expenditures materially higher than have been incurred by Ciner Wyoming over the past few years, and Ciner Wyoming intends to fund the project in part by reinvesting cash that would otherwise be distributed to its partners. In the third quarter of 2019, Ciner Wyoming significantly reduced its cash distributions to its partners, and we expect cash distributions to remain at the current lower level until the project is funded. However, the costs of the expansion project could be higher than expected, or the
execution of the project could be substantially delayed, which could materially impact Ciner Wyoming’s profitability and result in a further reduction of cash distributions to us. In addition, Ciner Wyoming's deca stockpiles will be substantially depleted by 2023. Without adding capacity through the expansion project, Ciner Wyoming's production rates would decline approximately 200,000 short tons, which would further impact Ciner Wyoming's profitability.
Fluctuations
in transportation costs and the availability or reliability of transportation could reduce the production of coal, soda ash and other minerals from our properties.
Transportation costs represent a significant portion of the total delivered cost for the customers of our lessees. Increases in transportation costs could make coal a less competitive source of energy or could make minerals produced by some or all of our lessees less competitive than coal produced from other sources. On the other hand, significant decreases in transportation costs could result in increased competition for our lessees from producers in other parts of the country.
Our lessees depend upon railroads, barges, trucks and beltlines to deliver minerals to their customers. Disruption of those transportation services
due to weather-related problems, mechanical difficulties, strikes, lockouts, bottlenecks and/or other events could temporarily impair the ability of our lessees to supply coal to their customers and/or increase their costs. Many of our lessees are currently experiencing transportation-related issues due in particular to decreased availability and reliability of rail services and port congestion. Our lessees’ transportation providers may face difficulties in the future that would impair the ability of our lessees to supply minerals to their customers, resulting in decreased royalty revenues to us.
In addition, Ciner Wyoming transports its soda ash by rail or truck and ocean vessel. As a result, its business and financial results are sensitive to increases in rail freight, trucking and ocean vessel rates. Increases in transportation costs, including increases resulting from emission
control requirements, port taxes and fluctuations in the price of fuel, could make soda ash a less competitive product for glass manufacturers when compared to glass substitutes or recycled glass, or could make Ciner Wyoming’s soda ash less competitive than soda ash produced by competitors that have other means of transportation or are located closer to their customers. Ciner Wyoming may be unable to pass on its freight and other transportation costs in full because market prices for soda ash are generally determined by supply and demand forces. In addition, rail operations are subject to various risks that may result in a delay or lack of service at Ciner Wyoming’s facility, and alternative methods of transportation are impracticable or cost prohibitive. For the year ended December 31, 2019, Ciner Wyoming shipped approximately 96.9% of its soda ash from the Green River facility
on a single rail line owned and controlled by Union Pacific. Ciner Wyoming’s current transportation contract with Union Pacific expires on December 31, 2021. There can be no assurance that this contract will be renewed on terms favorable to Ciner Wyoming or at all. Any substantial interruption in or increased costs related to the transportation of Ciner Wyoming’s soda ash or the failure to renew the rail contract on favorable terms could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our reserve estimates depend on many
assumptions that may be inaccurate, which could materially adversely affect the quantities and value of our reserves. In addition, compliance with new SEC rules that will become effective beginning in 2021 could result in material adjustments to the quantities of reserves we are allowed to report.
Coal, aggregates and industrial minerals reserve engineering requires subjective estimates of underground accumulations of coal, aggregates and industrial minerals, and assumptions and are by nature imprecise. Our reserve estimates may vary substantially from the actual amounts of coal, aggregates and industrial minerals recovered from our reserves. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of reserves, including many factors beyond our control. Estimates of reserves necessarily depend upon a number of variables and assumptions, any one of which may, if incorrect,
result in an estimate that varies considerably from actual results. These factors and assumptions relate to:
| |
• | future prices, operating costs, capital expenditures, severance and excise taxes, and development and reclamation costs; |
| |
• | future technology improvements; |
| |
• | the
effects of regulation by governmental agencies; and |
| |
• | geologic and mining conditions, which may not be fully identified by available exploration data. |
Actual production, revenue and expenditures with respect to our reserves will likely vary from estimates, and these variations may be material. As a result, undue reliance should not be placed on our reserve data that is included in this report.
In addition, the SEC has adopted new rules to modernize the property disclosure requirements for registrants with significant mining activities, which we will be required to begin to comply with for the fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2021 (reported in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2021). We are in the process of assessing the impact the new rules will have on our disclosures. The new rules require that reserve estimates that are reported be based on technical reports prepared using extensive mine-specific geological and engineering data, as well as market and cost assumptions. As a royalty company, we lease
coal reserves to third-party operators that have sole control of the mining and selling of coal from our properties. We may not have access to much of the information that is required to prepare the technical reports used to determine reserves under the new rules without unreasonable burden or expense. Accordingly, the amount of coal and other minerals that we are allowed to report under the new rules beginning with the year ending December 31, 2021 may differ materially from what we are currently reporting.
Our lessees could satisfy obligations to their customers with minerals from properties other than ours, depriving us of the ability to receive amounts in excess of minimum royalty payments.
Mineral supply contracts
generally do not require operators to satisfy their obligations to their customers with resources mined from specific reserves. Several factors may influence a lessee’s decision to supply its customers with minerals mined from properties we do not own or lease, including the royalty rates under the lessee’s lease with us, mining conditions, mine operating costs, cost and availability of transportation, and customer specifications. In addition, lessees move on and off of our properties over the course of any given year in accordance with their mine plans. If a lessee satisfies its obligations to its customers with minerals from properties we do not own or lease, production on our properties will decrease, and we will receive lower royalty revenues.
A lessee may incorrectly report royalty revenues, which might not be identified by our lessee audit process or our mine inspection
process or, if identified, might be identified in a subsequent period.
We depend on our lessees to correctly report production and royalty revenues on a monthly basis. Our regular lessee audits and mine inspections may not discover any irregularities in these reports or, if we do discover errors, we might not identify them in the reporting period in which they occurred. Any undiscovered reporting errors could result in a loss of royalty revenues and errors identified in subsequent periods could lead to accounting disputes as well as disputes with our lessees.
Our business is subject to cybersecurity risks.
Our business is increasingly dependent on information technologies and services. Threats
to information technology systems associated with cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents or attacks continue to grow. Although we utilize various procedures and controls to mitigate our exposure to such risks, cybersecurity attacks and other cyber events are evolving, unpredictable, and sometimes difficult to detect, and could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive information or render data or systems unusable.
We do not presently maintain insurance coverage to protect against cybersecurity risks. If we procure such coverage in the future, we cannot ensure that it will be sufficient to cover any particular losses we may experience as a result of such cyber attacks. Any cyber incident could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks
Related to Our Structure
Unitholders may not be able to remove our general partner even if they wish to do so.
Our general partner manages and operates NRP. Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, unitholders have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our business. Unitholders have no right to elect the general partner or the directors of the general partner on an annual or any other basis.
Furthermore, if unitholders are dissatisfied with the performance of our general partner, they currently have little practical ability to remove our general partner or otherwise change its management. Our general partner may not be removed except upon the vote of the holders of at least
66 2/3% of our outstanding common units (including common units held by our general partner and its affiliates and including common units deemed to be held by the holders of the preferred units who vote along with the common unitholders on an as-converted basis). Because of their substantial ownership in us, the removal of our general partner would be difficult without the consent of both our general partner and its affiliates and the holders of the preferred units.
In addition, the following provisions
of our partnership agreement may discourage a person or group from attempting to remove our general partner or otherwise change our management:
| |
• | generally, if a person (other than the holders of preferred units) acquires 20% or more of any class of units then outstanding other than from our general partner or its affiliates, the units owned by such person cannot be voted on any matter; and |
| |
• | our partnership agreement contains limitations upon the ability of unitholders to call meetings or to acquire information about our operations, as
well as other limitations upon the unitholders’ ability to influence the manner or direction of management. |
As a result of these provisions, the price at which the common units will trade may be lower because of the absence or reduction of a takeover premium in the trading price.
The preferred units are senior in right of distributions and liquidation and upon conversion, would result in the issuance of additional common units in the future, which could result in substantial dilution of our common unitholders’ ownership interests.
The preferred units rank senior to our common units with respect to distribution rights and rights upon liquidation. We are required to pay quarterly distributions on the preferred units (plus any
PIK units issued in lieu of preferred units) in an amount equal to 12.0% per year prior to paying any distributions on our common units. The preferred units also rank senior to the common units in right of liquidation and will be entitled to receive a liquidation preference in any such case.
The preferred units may also be converted into common units under certain circumstances. The number of common units issued in any conversion will be based on the then-current trading price of the common units at the time of conversion. Accordingly, the lower the trading price of our common units at the time of conversion, the greater the number of common units that will be issued upon conversion of the preferred units, which would result in greater dilution to our existing common unitholders. Dilution has the following effects on our common unitholders:
| |
• | an
existing unitholder’s proportionate ownership interest in NRP will decrease; |
| |
• | the amount of cash available for distribution on each unit may decrease; and |
| |
• | the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding unit may be diminished; and the market price of the common units may decline. |
In addition, to the extent the preferred units are converted into more than 66 2/3% of our common units, the holders
of the preferred will have the right to remove our general partner.
We may issue additional common units or preferred units without common unitholder approval, which would dilute a unitholder’s existing ownership interests.
Our general partner may cause us to issue an unlimited number of common units, without common unitholder approval (subject to applicable New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) rules). We may also issue at any time an unlimited number of equity securities ranking junior or senior to the common units (including additional preferred units) without common unitholder approval (subject to applicable NYSE rules). In addition, we may issue additional common units upon the exercise of the outstanding warrants held by Blackstone and Goldentree. The issuance of additional common units
or other equity securities of equal or senior rank will have the following effects:
| |
• | an existing unitholder’s proportionate ownership interest in NRP will decrease; |
| |
• | the amount of cash available for distribution on each unit may decrease; and |
| |
• | the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding unit may
be diminished; and the market price of the common units may decline. |
Our general partner has a limited call right that may require unitholders to sell their units at an undesirable time or price.
If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own 80% or more of the common units, the general partner will have the right, but not the obligation,
which it may assign to any of its affiliates, to acquire all, but not less than all, of the remaining common units held by unaffiliated persons at a price generally equal to the then current market price of the common units. As a result, unitholders may be required to sell their common units at a time when they may not desire to sell them or at a price that is less than the price they would like to receive. They may also incur a tax liability upon a sale of their common units.
Cost reimbursements due to our general partner may be substantial and will reduce our cash available for distribution to unitholders.
Prior to making any distribution on the common units, we reimburse our general partner and its affiliates, including officers and directors of the general partner, for all expenses
incurred on our behalf. The reimbursement of expenses and the payment of fees could adversely affect our ability to make distributions. The general partner has sole discretion to determine the amount of these expenses. In addition, our general partner and its affiliates may provide us services for which we will be charged reasonable fees as determined by the general partner.
Conflicts of interest could arise among our general partner and us or the unitholders.
These conflicts may include the following:
| |
• | We do not have any employees and we rely solely on employees of affiliates
of the general partner; |
| |
• | under our partnership agreement, we reimburse the general partner for the costs of managing and for operating the partnership; |
| |
• | the amount of cash expenditures, borrowings and reserves in any quarter may affect cash available to pay quarterly distributions to unitholders; |
| |
• | the
general partner tries to avoid being liable for partnership obligations. The general partner is permitted to protect its assets in this manner by our partnership agreement. Under our partnership agreement the general partner would not breach its fiduciary duty by avoiding liability for partnership obligations even if we can obtain more favorable terms without limiting the general partner’s liability; |
| |
• | under our partnership agreement, the general partner may pay its affiliates for any services rendered on terms fair and reasonable to us. The general partner may also enter into additional contracts with any of its affiliates on behalf of us. Agreements
or contracts between us and our general partner (and its affiliates) are not necessarily the result of arm’s-length negotiations; and |
| |
• | the general partner would not breach our partnership agreement by exercising its call rights to purchase limited partnership interests or by assigning its call rights to one of its affiliates or to us. |
In addition, Blackstone has certain consent rights and board appointment and observation rights. GoldenTree also has more limited consent rights. In the exercise of their applicable consent rights and/or board rights, conflicts of interest could arise between
us and our general partner on the one hand, and Blackstone or GoldenTree on the other hand.
The control of our general partner may be transferred to a third party without unitholder consent. A change of control may result in defaults under certain of our debt instruments and the triggering of payment obligations under compensation arrangements.
Our general partner may transfer its general partner interest to a third party in a merger or in a sale of all or substantially all of its assets without the consent of our unitholders. Furthermore, there is no restriction in our partnership agreement on the ability of the general partner of our general partner from transferring its general partnership interest in our general partner to a third party. The new owner of our general partner would
then be in a position to replace the Board of Directors and officers with its own choices and to control their decisions and actions.
In addition, a change of control would constitute an event of default under our debt agreements. During the continuance of an event of default under our debt agreements, the administrative agent may terminate any outstanding commitments of the lenders to extend credit to us and/or declare all amounts payable by us immediately
due and payable. In addition, upon a change of control, the holders of the preferred units would have the right to require us to redeem the preferred units at the liquidation preference or convert all of their preferred units into common units. A change of control also may trigger payment obligations under various compensation arrangements with our officers.
Unitholders may not have limited liability if a court finds that unitholder actions constitute control of our business.
Our general partner generally has unlimited liability for our obligations, such as our debts and environmental liabilities, except for those contractual obligations that are expressly made without recourse to our general partner. Under Delaware law, however, a unitholder could be held liable for our obligations
to the same extent as a general partner if a court determined that the right of unitholders to remove our general partner or to take other action under our partnership agreement constituted participation in the "control" of our business. In addition, Section 17-607 of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act provides that under some circumstances, a unitholder may be liable to us for the amount of a distribution for a period of three years from the date of the distribution.
Tax Risks to Our Unitholders
Our tax treatment depends on our status as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes as well as our not being subject to a material amount of entity-level taxation by individual states. If the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") were to treat us as a corporation for federal income tax purposes or we were to become subject to material additional amounts
of entity-level taxation for state tax purposes, then our cash available for distribution to unitholders would be substantially reduced.
The anticipated after-tax economic benefit of an investment in our units depends largely on our being treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Despite the fact that we are organized as a limited partnership under Delaware law, we would be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes unless we satisfy a "qualifying income" requirement. Based on our current operations and current Treasury regulations, we believe we satisfy the qualifying income requirement. However, we have not requested, and do not plan to request, a ruling from the IRS on this or any other matter affecting us. Failing to meet the qualifying income requirement or a change in current law could cause us to be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes or otherwise
subject us to taxation as an entity.
If we were treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we would pay federal income tax on our taxable income at the corporate tax rate and would likely be liable for state income tax at varying rates. Distributions to our unitholders would generally be taxed again as corporate distributions, and no income, gains, losses, deductions or credits would flow through to our unitholders. Because tax would be imposed upon us as a corporation, our cash available for distribution to our unitholders would be substantially reduced. Therefore, treatment of us as a corporation would result in a material reduction in the anticipated cash flow and after-tax return to our unitholders, likely causing a substantial reduction in the value of our units.
At the state level, several states have been evaluating ways to subject partnerships to entity-level
taxation through the imposition of state income, franchise and other forms of taxation. Imposition of a similar tax on us in a jurisdiction in which we operate or in other jurisdictions to which we may expand could substantially reduce the cash available for distribution to our unitholders.
The tax treatment of publicly traded partnerships or an investment in our units could be subject to potential legislative, judicial or administrative changes or differing interpretations, possibly applied on a retroactive basis.
The present U.S. federal income tax treatment of publicly traded partnerships, including us, or an investment in our units may be modified by administrative, legislative or judicial changes or differing interpretations at any time. From time to time, members of Congress propose and consider substantive changes to the existing U.S. federal income tax laws that affect publicly
traded partnerships. Any modification to the U.S. federal income tax laws may be applied retroactively and could make it more difficult or impossible for us to meet the exception for certain publicly traded partnerships to be treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For example, the “Clean Energy for America Act,” which is similar to legislation that was commonly proposed during the Obama Administration, was introduced in the Senate on May 2, 2019. If enacted, this proposal would, among other things, repeal the qualifying income exception within Section 7704(d)(1)(E) of the Code upon which we rely for our status as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
In addition, the Treasury Department has issued, and in the future may issue, regulations interpreting those laws that affect publicly traded partnerships. There can be no assurance that there will not be further changes to U.S. federal income tax laws or the Treasury Department’s interpretation of the qualifying income rules in a manner that could impact our ability to qualify as a publicly traded partnership in the future.
Furthermore, any interpretation of or modification to the U.S. federal income tax laws may be applied retroactively and could make it more difficult or impossible for us to meet the exception for certain publicly traded partnerships to be treated as partnerships for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. We are unable to predict whether any of these changes or other proposals will ultimately be enacted. Any similar or future legislative changes could negatively impact the value of an investment in our units. You are urged to consult with your own tax advisor with respect to the status of regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on your investment in our units.
Certain federal income tax preferences currently available with respect to coal exploration and development may be eliminated as a result of future legislation.
Changes to U.S. federal income tax laws have been proposed in a prior session of Congress that would eliminate certain key U.S. federal income tax preferences relating to coal exploration and development. These changes include, but are not limited to (i) repealing capital gains treatment of coal and lignite
royalties, (ii) eliminating current deductions and 60-month amortization for exploration and development costs relating to coal and other hard mineral fossil fuels, and (iii) repealing the percentage depletion allowance with respect to coal properties. If enacted, these changes would limit or eliminate certain tax deductions that are currently available with respect to coal exploration and development, and any such change could increase the taxable income allocable to our unitholders and negatively impact the value of an investment in our units. We are not aware of any current proposals with regard to these changes.
Our unitholders are required to pay taxes on their share of our income even if they do not receive any cash distributions from us. Our unitholders' share of our portfolio income may be taxable to them even though they receive other losses from our activities.
Because
our unitholders are treated as partners to whom we allocate taxable income that could be different in amount than the cash we distribute, our unitholders are required to pay any federal income taxes and, in some cases, state and local income taxes on their share of our taxable income even if they receive no cash distributions from us. Our unitholders may not receive cash distributions from us equal to their share of our taxable income or even equal to the actual tax due from them with respect to that income.
For our unitholders subject to the passive loss rules, our current operations include portfolio activities (such as our coal and mineral royalty businesses) and passive activities (such as our soda ash business). Any passive losses we generate will only be available to offset our passive income generated in the future and will not be available to offset (i) our portfolio income, including income related to our coal and
mineral royalty businesses, (ii) a unitholder’s income from other passive activities or investments, including investments in other publicly traded partnerships, or (iii) a unitholder’s salary or active business income. Thus, our unitholders' share of our portfolio income may be subject to federal income tax, regardless of other losses they may receive from us.
We may engage in transactions to reduce our indebtedness and manage our liquidity that generate taxable income (including income and gain from the sale of properties and cancellation of indebtedness income) allocable to our unitholders, and income tax liabilities arising therefrom may exceed any distributions made with respect to their units.
We may engage in transactions to reduce our leverage and manage our liquidity that would result in income and gain to our unitholders without a corresponding cash distribution. For example,
we may sell assets and use the proceeds to repay existing debt, in which case, our unitholders could be allocated taxable income and gain resulting from the sale without receiving a cash distribution. Further, we may pursue opportunities to reduce our existing debt, such as debt exchanges, debt repurchases, or modifications of our existing debt that would result in “cancellation of indebtedness income” (also referred to as “COD income”) being allocated to our unitholders as ordinary taxable income. Our unitholders may be allocated income and gain from these transactions, and income tax liabilities arising therefrom may exceed any distributions we make to our unitholders. The ultimate tax effect of any such income allocations will depend on the unitholder's individual tax position, including, for example, the availability of any suspended passive losses that may offset some portion of the allocable income. Our unitholders may, however, be allocated substantial
amounts of ordinary income subject to taxation, without any ability to offset such allocated income against
any capital losses attributable to the unitholder’s ultimate disposition of its units. Our unitholders are encouraged to consult their tax advisors with respect to the consequences to them
If the IRS contests the federal income tax positions we take, the market for our units may be adversely impacted and the cost of any IRS contest will reduce our cash
available for distribution to our unitholders.
We have not requested a ruling from the IRS with respect to our treatment as a partnership for federal income tax purposes or any other matter affecting us. The IRS may adopt positions that differ from the positions we take. It may be necessary to resort to administrative or court proceedings to sustain some or all of the positions we take. A court may not agree with some or all of the positions we take. Any contest by the IRS may materially and adversely impact the market for our units and the price at which they trade. In addition, our costs of any contest by the IRS will be borne indirectly by our unitholders and our general partner because the costs will reduce our cash available for distribution.
If the IRS makes audit adjustments to our income tax returns for tax years beginning after December
31, 2017, it (and some states) may assess and collect any taxes (including any applicable penalties and interest) resulting from such audit adjustment directly from us, in which case our cash available for distribution to our unitholders might be substantially reduced . Pursuant to the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, if the IRS makes audit adjustments to our income tax returns, it (and some states) may assess and collect any taxes (including any applicable penalties and interest) resulting from such audit adjustment directly from us. To the extent possible under these rules, our general partner may elect to either pay the taxes (including any applicable penalties and interest) directly to the IRS or, if we are eligible, issue a revised information statement to each unitholder and former unitholder with respect to an audited
and adjusted return. Although our general partner may elect to have our unitholders and former unitholders take such audit adjustment into account and pay any resulting taxes (including applicable penalties or interest) in accordance with their interests in us during the tax year under audit, there can be no assurance that such election will be practical, permissible or effective in all circumstances. As a result, our current unitholders may bear some or all of the tax liability resulting from such audit adjustment, even if such unitholders did not own units in us during the tax year under audit. If, as a result of any such audit adjustment, we are required to make payments of taxes, penalties and interest, our cash available for distribution to our unitholders might be substantially reduced. Tax gain or loss on the disposition of our common units could be more or less than expected.
If
our unitholders sell their common units, they will recognize a gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized and their tax basis in those common units. Distributions in excess of a common unitholder's allocable share of our net taxable income result in a decrease in the tax basis in such unitholder's common units. Accordingly, the amount, if any, of such prior excess distributions with respect to the common units sold will, in effect, become taxable income to our common unitholders if they sell such common units at a price greater than their tax basis in those common units, even if the price they receive is less than their original cost. In addition, because the amount realized includes a unitholder’s share of our nonrecourse liabilities, if our unitholders sell their common units, they may incur a tax liability in excess of the amount of cash they receive from the sale.
A substantial portion of the amount
realized from a unitholder’s sale of our units, whether or not representing gain, may be taxed as ordinary income due to potential recapture items, including depletion and depreciation recapture. Thus, a unitholder may recognize both ordinary income and capital loss from the sale of units if the amount realized on a sale of such units is less than such unitholder’s adjusted basis in the units. Net capital loss may only offset capital gains and, in the case of individuals, up to $3,000 of ordinary income per year. In the taxable period in which a unitholder sells its units, such unitholder may recognize ordinary income from our allocations of income and gain to such unitholder prior to the sale and from recapture items that generally cannot be offset by any capital loss recognized upon the sale of units.
Our unitholders may be subject to limitation on their ability to deduct interest expense incurred by us.
In
general, we are entitled to a deduction for interest paid or accrued on indebtedness properly allocable to our trade or business during our taxable year. However, under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, our deduction for “business interest” is limited to the sum of our business interest income and 30% of our “adjusted taxable income.” For the purposes of this limitation, our adjusted taxable income is computed without regard to any business interest expense or business interest income, and in the case of taxable years beginning before January 1, 2022, any deduction allowable for depreciation, amortization, or depletion to the extent such depreciation, amortization, or depletion is not capitalized into cost of goods sold with respect to inventory. If our “business interest” is subject to limitation under
these rules, our unitholders will be limited in their
ability to deduct their share of any interest expense that has been allocated to them. As a result, unitholders may be subject to limitation on their ability to deduct interest expense incurred by us.
Tax-exempt entities face unique tax issues from owning our units that may result in adverse tax consequences to them.
Investment in our units by tax-exempt entities,
such as employee benefit plans and individual retirement accounts (known as IRAs) raises issues unique to them. For example, virtually all of our income allocated to organizations that are exempt from U.S. federal income tax, including IRAs and other retirement plans, will be unrelated business taxable income and will be taxable to them. Further, under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, subject to the proposed aggregation rules for certain similarly situated businesses or activities issued by the Treasury Department, a tax-exempt entity with more than one unrelated trade or business (including by attribution from investment in a partnership such as ours that is engaged in one or more unrelated trade or business) is required to compute the unrelated business taxable income of such tax-exempt entity separately with respect to each such trade or business (including for purposes
of determining any net operating loss deduction). As a result, for years beginning after December 31, 2017, it may not be possible for tax-exempt entities to utilize losses from an investment in our partnership to offset unrelated business taxable income from another unrelated trade or business and vice versa. Tax-exempt entities should consult a tax advisor before investing in our units. Non-U.S. Unitholders will be subject to U.S. taxes and withholding with respect to their income and gain from owning our units.
Non-U.S. unitholders are generally taxed and subject to income tax filing requirements by the United States on income effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business (“effectively connected income”). Income allocated to our unitholders and any gain from the sale of our units will generally be considered to be
“effectively connected” with a U.S. trade or business. As a result, distributions to a Non-U.S. unitholder will be subject to withholding at the highest applicable effective tax rate and a Non-U.S. unitholder who sells or otherwise disposes of a unit will also be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the gain realized from the sale or disposition of that unit.
Moreover, the transferee of an interest in a partnership that is engaged in a U.S. trade or business is generally required to withhold 10% of the amount realized by the transferor unless the transferor certifies that it is not a foreign person, and we are required to deduct and withhold from the transferee amounts that should have been withheld by the transferees but were not withheld. Because the “amount realized” includes a partner’s share of the partnership’s liabilities, 10% of the amount realized could exceed the total cash purchase price for the units.
However, pending the issuance of final regulations, the IRS has suspended the application of this withholding rule to transfers of publicly traded interests in publicly traded partnerships. If recently promulgated regulations are finalized as proposed, such regulations would provide, with respect to transfers of publicly traded interests in publicly traded partnerships effected through a broker, that the obligation to withhold is imposed on the transferor’s broker and that a partner’s “amount realized” does not include a partner’s share of a publicly traded partnership’s liabilities for purposes of determining the amount subject to withholding. However, it is not clear when such regulations will be finalized and if they will be finalized in their current form.
We will treat each purchaser of our common units as having the same tax benefits without regard to the actual common units purchased. The IRS may challenge this
treatment, which could adversely affect the value of the common units.
Because we cannot match transferors and transferees of our common units and for other reasons, we have adopted depreciation and amortization positions that may not conform to all aspects of existing Treasury Regulations. A successful IRS challenge to those positions could adversely affect the amount of tax benefits available to our unitholders. It also could affect the timing of these tax benefits or the amount of gain from the sale of common units and could have a negative impact on the value of our common units or result in audit adjustments to our unitholders' tax returns.
We have adopted certain valuation methodologies in determining a unitholder’s allocations of income, gain, loss and deduction. The IRS may challenge these methodologies or the resulting allocations, and such a challenge could adversely affect
the value of our common units.
In determining the items of income, gain, loss and deduction allocable to our unitholders, including when we issue additional units, we must determine the fair market value of our assets. Although we may from time to time consult with professional appraisers regarding valuation matters, we make many fair market value estimates using a methodology based on the market value of our
common
units as a means to measure the fair market value of our assets. The IRS may challenge these valuation methods and the resulting allocations of income, gain, loss and deduction.
We generally prorate our items of income, gain, loss and deduction between transferors and transferees of our common units each month based upon the ownership of our common units on the first day of each month, instead of on the basis of the date a particular unit is transferred. The IRS may challenge this treatment, which could change the allocation of items of income, gain, loss and deduction among our unitholders.
We generally prorate our items of income, gain, loss and deduction between transferors and transferees of our common units each month based upon the ownership of our common units on the first day of each month (the "Allocation Date"),
instead of on the basis of the date a particular unit is transferred. Similarly, we generally allocate certain deductions for depreciation of capital additions, gain or loss realized on a sale or other disposition of our assets and, in the discretion of the general partner, any other extraordinary item of income, gain, loss or deduction based upon ownership on the Allocation Date. Treasury Regulations allow a similar monthly simplifying convention, but such regulations do not specifically authorize the use of the proration method we have adopted. If the IRS were to challenge our proration method, we may be required to change the allocation of items of income, gain, loss and deduction among our unitholders.
A unitholder whose units are the subject of a securities loan (e.g., a loan to a "short seller" to cover a short sale of units) may be considered as having disposed of those units. If so, he would no longer be treated
for tax purposes as a partner with respect to those units during the period of the loan and may recognize gain or loss from the disposition.
Because there are no specific rules governing the U.S. federal income tax consequences of loaning a partnership interest, a unitholder whose units are the subject of a securities loan may be considered as having disposed of the loaned units. In that case, the unitholder may no longer be treated for tax purposes as a partner with respect to those units during the period of the loan to the short seller and the unitholder may recognize gain or loss from such disposition. Moreover, during the period of the loan, any of our income, gain, loss or deduction with respect to those units may not be reportable by the unitholder and any cash distributions received by the unitholder as to those units could be fully taxable as ordinary income. Our unitholders desiring to assure their status as partners
and avoid the risk of gain recognition from a loan of their units are urged to consult a tax advisor to determine whether it is advisable to modify any applicable brokerage account agreements to prohibit their brokers from borrowing their units.
As a result of investing in our units, our unitholders are likely subject to state and local taxes and return filing requirements in jurisdictions where we operate or own or acquire property.
In addition to U.S. federal income taxes, our unitholders are likely subject to other taxes, including state and local taxes, unincorporated business taxes and estate, inheritance or intangible taxes that are imposed by the various jurisdictions in which we conduct business or own property now or in the future, even if our unitholders do not live in any of those jurisdictions. Our unitholders are likely required to file state and local income tax returns
and pay state and local income taxes in some or all of these various jurisdictions. Further, our unitholders may be subject to penalties for failure to comply with those requirements. We own property and conduct business in a number of states in the United States. Most of these states impose an income tax on individuals, corporations and other entities. As we make acquisitions or expand our business, we may own assets or conduct business in additional states that impose a personal income tax. It is the unitholder's responsibility to file all U.S. federal, state and local tax returns and pay any taxes due in these jurisdictions. Unitholders should consult with their own tax advisors regarding the filing of such tax returns, the payment of such taxes, and the deductibility of any taxes paid.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved, from time to time, in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. While the ultimate results of these proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes these ordinary course matters will not have a material effect on our financial position, liquidity or operations. During 2019, we were also involved in the legal proceeding described below.
In January 2013, we acquired a non-controlling 48.51% general partner interest in OCI Wyoming,
L.P. ("OCI LP") and all of the preferred stock and a portion of the common stock of OCI Wyoming Co. ("OCI Co") (which in turn owned a 1% limited partner interest in OCI LP) from Anadarko Holding Company and its subsidiary, Big Island Trona Company (together, "Anadarko"). The remaining general partner interest in OCI LP and common stock of OCI Co were owned by subsidiaries of OCI Chemical Corporation.
The acquisition agreement provided for additional contingent consideration of up to $50 million to be paid by us if certain performance criteria were met at OCI LP as defined in the purchase and sale agreement in any of the years 2013, 2014 or 2015. For those years, we paid an
aggregate of $11.5 million to Anadarko in full satisfaction of these contingent consideration payment obligations.
In July 2013, pursuant to a series of transactions in connection with an initial public offering by a subsidiary of OCI Chemical Corporation, the ownership structure in OCI LP was simplified. In connection with such reorganization, we exchanged the stock of OCI Co for a limited partner interest in OCI LP. Following the reorganization, our interest in OCI LP remained at 49%, consisting of both limited and general partner interests. The restructuring did not have any impact on the operations, revenues, management or control of OCI LP.
In July 2017, Anadarko filed a lawsuit against Opco
and NRP Trona LLC in the District Court of Harris County, Texas, 157th Judicial District. The complaint alleged that the transactions conducted in 2013 triggered an acceleration of NRP's obligation under the purchase agreement with Anadarko to pay additional contingent consideration in full and demanded immediate payment of such amount, together with interest, court costs and attorneys’ fees.
In November 2019, the trial court ruled in our favor in all respects, including that the internal restructuring that occurred did not trigger an acceleration of the contingent purchase price payment obligation under the purchase agreement with Anadarko. Accordingly, the trial court ordered that Anadarko take nothing. Anadarko did not appeal the trial court's ruling, and this case is concluded with no liability to us.
ITEM
4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
None.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED UNITHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
NRP
Common Units
Our common units are listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol "NRP." As of February 10, 2020, there were approximately 13,180 beneficial and registered holders of our common units. The computation of the approximate number of unitholders is based upon a broker survey.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table shows the securities authorized for issuance under our 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan at December 31, 2019. The initial number of common units authorized for issuance pursuant
to awards under the plan was 800,000. |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | Number
of securities remaining available for issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) |
Plan Category | | (a) | | (b) | | (c) |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | | — |
| | — |
| | 613,018
(1) |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | | n/a |
| | n/a |
| | n/a |
|
Total | | — |
| | — |
| | 613,018 |
|
| |
(1) | As
of December 31, 2019, 157,789 phantom units were outstanding under the plan. Each phantom unit represents the right to receive one common unit, together with associated distribution equivalent rights. |
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For
the Year Ended December 31, |
(In thousands, except per unit data) | 2019 | | 2018 (1) | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Total revenues and other income | $ | 263,935 |
| | $ | 278,512 |
| | $ | 246,325 |
| | $ | 279,244 |
| | $ | 300,635 |
|
Asset
impairments | $ | 148,214 |
| | $ | 18,280 |
| | $ | 2,967 |
| | $ | 15,861 |
| | $ | 378,327 |
|
Income
(loss) from operations | $ | 51,321 |
| | $ | 192,538 |
| | $ | 176,559 |
| | $ | 181,157 |
| | $ | (170,699 | ) |
Net
income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (25,414 | ) | | $ | 122,360 |
| | $ | 82,485 |
| | $ | 90,626 |
| | $ | (260,443 | ) |
Net
income from continuing operations excluding impairments | $ | 122,800 |
| | $ | 140,640 |
| | $ | 85,452 |
| | $ | 106,487 |
| | $ | 117,884 |
|
Net
income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | 956 |
| | $ | 17,687 |
| | $ | 6,182 |
| | $ | 6,266 |
| | $ | (311,277 | ) |
Net
income (loss) | $ | (24,458 | ) | | $ | 140,047 |
| | $ | 88,667 |
| | $ | 96,892 |
| | $ | (571,720 | ) |
Per
common unit amounts (basic) | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (4.43 | ) | | $ | 7.35 |
| | $ | 4.57 |
| | $ | 7.28 |
| | $ | (20.80 | ) |
Net
income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | 0.08 |
| | $ | 1.42 |
| | $ | 0.50 |
| | $ | 0.50 |
| | $ | (24.94 | ) |
Net
income (loss) | $ | (4.35 | ) | | $ | 8.77 |
| | $ | 5.06 |
| | $ | 7.78 |
| | $ | (45.75 | ) |
Per
common unit amounts (diluted) | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (4.43 | ) | | $ | 5.90 |
| | $ | 3.68 |
| | $ | 7.28 |
| | $ | (20.80 | ) |
Net
income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | 0.08 |
| | $ | 0.86 |
| | $ | 0.28 |
| | $ | 0.50 |
| | $ | (24.94 | ) |
Net
income (loss) | $ | (4.35 | ) | | $ | 6.76 |
| | $ | 3.96 |
| | $ | 7.78 |
| | $ | (45.75 | ) |
Distributions
paid per common unit | $ | 2.65 |
| | $ | 1.80 |
| | $ | 1.80 |
| | $ | 1.80 |
| | $ | 2.70 |
|
Average
number of common units outstanding - basic | 12,260 |
| | 12,244 |
| | 12,232 |
| | 12,232 |
| | 12,232 |
|
Average
number of common units outstanding - diluted | 12,260 |
| | 20,234 |
| | 21,950 |
| | 12,232 |
| | 12,232 |
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) | | | | | | | | | |
Operating activities of continuing operations | $ | 137,319 |
| | $ | 178,282 |
| | $ | 112,151 |
| | $ | 80,243 |
| | $ | 144,907 |
|
Investing
activities of continuing operations | $ | 8,221 |
| | $ | 7,607 |
| | $ | 9,807 |
| | $ | 65,057 |
| | $ | 15,805 |
|
Financing
activities of continuing operations | $ | (253,305 | ) | | $ | (6,839 | ) | | $ | (134,149 | ) | | $ | (146,373 | ) | | $ | (166,443 | ) |
Distributable
cash flow (2) | $ | 144,933 |
| | $ | 383,980 |
| | $ | 121,958 |
| | $ | 255,172 |
| | $ | 157,815 |
|
Free
cash flow (2) | $ | 139,040 |
| | $ | 183,440 |
| | $ | 121,324 |
| | $ | 75,970 |
| | $ | 144,210 |
|
Cash
flow cushion (2) | $ | 7,762 |
| | $ | 16,080 |
| | $ | 9,248 |
| | $ | (29,444 | ) | | $ | (8,339 | ) |
Adjusted
EBITDA (2) | $ | 199,228 |
| | $ | 230,241 |
| | $ | 211,483 |
| | $ | 235,273 |
| | $ | 240,553 |
|
Cash,
cash equivalents and restricted cash | $ | 98,265 |
| | $ | 206,030 |
| | $ | 26,980 |
| | $ | 39,171 |
| | $ | 40,244 |
|
Total
assets | $ | 1,085,907 |
| | $ | 1,341,647 |
| | $ | 1,389,164 |
| | $ | 1,448,649 |
| | $ | 1,674,865 |
|
Current
portion of long-term debt, net | $ | 45,776 |
| | $ | 115,184 |
| | $ | 79,740 |
| | $ | 140,037 |
| | $ | 80,745 |
|
Long-term
debt, net | $ | 470,422 |
| | $ | 557,574 |
| | $ | 729,608 |
| | $ | 990,234 |
| | $ | 1,130,696 |
|
Long-term
lease obligations (3) | $ | 3,506 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Class
A convertible preferred units | $ | 164,587 |
| | $ | 164,587 |
| | $ | 173,431 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Partners’
capital | $ | 338,963 |
| | $ | 423,481 |
| | $ | 265,211 |
| | $ | 151,530 |
| | $ | 76,336 |
|
| |
(1) | On
January 1, 2018, NRP adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and all the related amendments to all open contracts using the modified retrospective method. NRP recognized a $70.5 million cumulative effect of adoption adjustment in the opening balance of partners' capital on January 1, 2018. Comparative information for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 have not been restated and continues to be reported under the standards in effect for those periods. |
| |
(2) | See
"—Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below. |
| |
(3) | On January 1, 2019, NRP adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 842, Leases, and all the related amendments and recognized assets and liabilities on its Consolidated Balance Sheet for the present value of the rights and obligations created by all leases with terms of more than 12 months. |
Non-GAAP
Financial Measures
Distributable Cash Flow
Distributable cash flow ("DCF") represents net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations plus distributions from unconsolidated investment in excess of cumulative earnings, proceeds from asset sales and disposals, including sales of discontinued operations, and return of long-term contract receivables; less maintenance capital expenditures and distributions to non-controlling interest. DCF is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities. DCF may not be calculated the same for us as for other companies.
In addition, DCF presented below is not calculated or presented on the same basis as distributable cash flow as defined in our partnership agreement, which is used as a metric to determine whether we are able to increase quarterly distributions to our common unitholders. DCF is a supplemental liquidity measure used by our management and by external users of our financial statements, such as investors, commercial banks, research analysts and others to asses our ability to make cash distributions and repay debt.
Free Cash Flow
Free cash flow ("FCF") represents net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations plus distributions from unconsolidated investment in excess of cumulative earnings and return of long-term contract
receivables; less maintenance and expansion capital expenditures, cash flow used in acquisition costs classified as financing activities and distributions to non-controlling interest. FCF is calculated before mandatory debt repayments. FCF is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities. FCF may not be calculated the same for us as for other companies. FCF is a supplemental liquidity measure used by our management and by external users of our financial statements, such as investors, commercial banks, research analysts and others to assess our ability to make cash distributions and repay debt. Cash Flow Cushion
Cash flow cushion represents net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations plus distributions from unconsolidated investment in
excess of cumulative earnings and return of long-term contract receivables; less maintenance and expansion capital expenditures, cash flow used in acquisition costs classified as financing activities, distributions to non-controlling interest, one-time beneficial items, mandatory Opco debt repayments, preferred unit distributions and common unit distributions. Cash flow cushion is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities. Cash flow cushion is a supplemental liquidity measure used by our management to assess our ability to make or raise cash distributions to our common and preferred unitholders and our general partner and repay debt or redeem preferred units.
The following table reconciles net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations (the most comparable GAAP financial measure) to DCF, FCF and cash flow cushion for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For
the Year Ended December 31, |
(In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations | $ | 137,319 |
| | $ | 178,282 |
| | $ | 112,151 |
| | $ | 80,243 |
| | $ | 144,907 |
|
Add:
distributions from unconsolidated investment in excess of cumulative earnings | — |
| | 2,097 |
| | 5,646 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Add:
proceeds from asset sales and disposals | 6,500 |
| | 2,449 |
| | 1,151 |
| | 62,117 |
| | 13,605 |
|
Add:
proceeds from sale of discontinued operations | (629 | ) | | 198,091 |
| | — |
| | 109,872 |
| | — |
|
Add:
return of long-term contract receivables | 1,743 |
| | 3,061 |
| | 3,010 |
| | 2,968 |
| | 2,463 |
|
Less:
maintenance capital expenditures | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (28 | ) | | (416 | ) |
Less:
distributions to non-controlling interest | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2,744 | ) |
Distributable
cash flow | $ | 144,933 |
| | $ | 383,980 |
| | $ | 121,958 |
| | $ | 255,172 |
| | $ | 157,815 |
|
Less:
proceeds from asset sales and disposals | (6,500 | ) | | (2,449 | ) | | (1,151 | ) | | (62,117 | ) | | (13,605 | ) |
Less:
proceeds from sale of discontinued operations | 629 |
| | (198,091 | ) | | — |
| | (109,872 | ) | | — |
|
Less:
expansion capital expenditures | (22 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Less:
acquisition costs classified as financing activities | — |
| | — |
| | 517 |
| | (7,213 | ) | | — |
|
Free
cash flow | $ | 139,040 |
| | $ | 183,440 |
| | $ | 121,324 |
| | $ | 75,970 |
| | $ | 144,210 |
|
Less:
cash flow from one-time Hillsboro litigation settlement | — |
| | (25,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Less:
mandatory Opco debt repayments | (68,128 | ) | | (80,765 | ) | | (80,765 | ) | | (82,949 | ) | | (80,791 | ) |
Less:
preferred unit distributions and redemption of PIK units | (30,000 | ) | | (39,109 | ) | | (8,844 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Less:
common unit distributions | (33,150 | ) | | (22,486 | ) | | (22,467 | ) | | (22,465 | ) | | (71,758 | ) |
Cash
flow cushion | $ | 7,762 |
| | $ | 16,080 |
| | $ | 9,248 |
| | $ | (29,444 | ) | | $ | (8,339 | ) |
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that we define as net income (loss) from continuing operations less equity earnings from unconsolidated investment, net income attributable to non-controlling interest and gain on reserve swap; plus total distributions from unconsolidated investment, interest expense, net, debt modification expense, loss on extinguishment of debt, depreciation, depletion and amortization and asset impairments. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income or loss, net income or loss attributable
to partners, operating income, cash flows from operating activities or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with GAAP as measures of operating performance, liquidity or ability to service debt obligations. There are significant limitations to using Adjusted EBITDA as a measure of performance, including the inability to analyze the effect of certain recurring items that materially affect our net income (loss), the lack of comparability of results of operations of different companies and the different methods of calculating Adjusted EBITDA reported by different companies. In addition, Adjusted EBITDA presented below is not calculated or presented on the same basis as Consolidated EBITDA as defined in our partnership agreement or Consolidated EBITDDA as defined in Opco's debt agreements. See "Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 12. Debt, Net" included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of Opco’s debt agreements. Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental performance measure used by our management and by external users of our financial statements, such as investors, commercial banks, research analysts and others to assess the financial performance of our assets without regard to financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis.
The following table reconciles net income (loss) from continuing operations (the most comparable GAAP financial measure) to Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017,
2016, and 2015: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Year Ended December 31, |
(In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Net
income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (25,414 | ) | | $ | 122,360 |
| | $ | 82,485 |
| | $ | 90,626 |
| | $ | (260,443 | ) |
Less:
equity earnings from unconsolidated investment | (47,089 | ) | | (48,306 | ) | | (40,457 | ) | | (40,061 | ) | | (49,918 | ) |
Less:
net income attributable to non-controlling interest | — |
| | (510 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Less:
gain on reserve swap | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (9,290 | ) |
Add:
total distributions from unconsolidated investment | 31,850 |
| | 46,550 |
| | 49,000 |
| | 46,550 |
| | 46,795 |
|
Add:
interest expense, net | 47,453 |
| | 70,178 |
| | 82,028 |
| | 90,531 |
| | 89,744 |
|
Add:
debt modification expense | — |
| | — |
| | 7,939 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Add:
loss on extinguishment of debt | 29,282 |
| | — |
| | 4,107 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Add:
depreciation, depletion and amortization | 14,932 |
| | 21,689 |
| | 23,414 |
| | 31,766 |
| | 45,338 |
|
Add:
asset impairments | 148,214 |
| | 18,280 |
| | 2,967 |
| | 15,861 |
| | 378,327 |
|
Adjusted
EBITDA | $ | 199,228 |
|
| $ | 230,241 |
|
| $ | 211,483 |
|
| $ | 235,273 |
|
| $ | 240,553 |
|
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Introduction
The following discussion and analysis presents management’s view of our business, financial condition and overall performance and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and footnotes included elsewhere in this filing. Our discussion and analysis consists of the following subjects:
•Executive Overview
•Results of Operations
•Liquidity
and Capital Resources
•Off-Balance Sheet Transactions
•Inflation
•Environmental Regulation
•Related Party Transactions
•Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates
•Recent Accounting Standards
As used in this Item 7, unless the context otherwise requires: "we," "our," "us" and the "Partnership" refer to Natural Resource Partners L.P. and, where the context requires, our subsidiaries.
References to "NRP" and "Natural Resource Partners" refer to Natural Resource Partners L.P. only, and not to NRP (Operating) LLC or any of Natural Resource Partners L.P.’s subsidiaries. References to "Opco" refer to NRP (Operating) LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of NRP, and its subsidiaries. NRP Finance Corporation ("NRP Finance") is a wholly owned subsidiary of NRP and a co-issuer with NRP on the 9.125% senior notes due 2025 (the "2025 Senior Notes").
Executive Overview
We are a diversified natural resource company engaged principally in the business of owning, managing and leasing a diversified portfolio of mineral properties in the United States, including interests in coal and other natural resources and own a non-controlling 49% interest in Ciner Wyoming LLC ("Ciner Wyoming"), a trona ore mining and soda ash production business. Our common units trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "NRP." Our business is organized into two operating segments:
Coal Royalty and Other—consists primarily of coal royalty
properties and coal-related transportation and processing assets. Other assets include industrial mineral royalty properties, aggregates royalty properties, oil and gas royalty properties and timber. Our coal reserves are primarily located in Appalachia, the Illinois Basin and the Northern Powder River Basin in the United States. Our industrial minerals and aggregates properties are located in various states across the United States, our oil and gas royalty assets are primarily located in Louisiana and our timber assets are primarily located in West Virginia.
Soda Ash—consists of our 49% non-controlling equity interest in Ciner Wyoming, a trona ore mining and soda ash production business located in the Green River Basin of Wyoming. Ciner Resources LP, our operating partner, mines the trona, processes it into soda ash, and distributes the soda ash both domestically and internationally into the glass
and chemicals industries.
Corporate and Financing includes functional corporate departments that do not earn revenues. Costs incurred by these departments include interest and financing, corporate headquarters and overhead, centralized treasury, legal and accounting and other corporate-level activity not specifically allocated to a segment.
We remain focused on strengthening our balance sheet and maintaining sufficient liquidity to manage our business through periods of volatility in commodity prices. We devote significant amounts of cash each year to make mandatory amortization payments on the Opco Senior Notes as well as to make distributions on our preferred units and common units. Accordingly, preserving the financial flexibility to respond to changes in market conditions while continuing to service our debt and make distributions
to unitholders is one of our key objectives.
Our financial results by segment for the year ended December 31, 2019 are as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Operating
Segments | | | | |
(In thousands) | | Coal Royalty and Other | | Soda Ash | | Corporate and Financing | | Total |
Revenues
and other income | | $ | 216,846 |
| | $ | 47,089 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 263,935 |
|
Net
income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 21,211 |
| | $ | 46,840 |
| | $ | (93,465 | ) | | $ | (25,414 | ) |
Asset
impairments | | 148,214 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 148,214 |
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations excluding
asset impairments | | $ | 169,425 |
| | $ | 46,840 |
| | $ | (93,465 | ) | | $ | 122,800 |
|
Adjusted
EBITDA (1) | | $ | 184,357 |
| | $ | 31,601 |
| | $ | (16,730 | ) | | $ | 199,228 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Cash
flow provided by (used in) continuing operations | | | | | | | | |
Operating activities | | $ | 178,863 |
| | $ | 31,601 |
| | $ | (73,145 | ) | | $ | 137,319 |
|
Investing
activities | | $ | 8,221 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 8,221 |
|
Financing
activities | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (253,305 | ) | | $ | (253,305 | ) |
Distributable
cash flow (1) | | $ | 187,106 |
| | $ | 31,601 |
| | $ | (73,145 | ) | | $ | 144,933 |
|
Free
cash flow (1) | | $ | 180,584 |
| | $ | 31,601 |
| | $ | (73,145 | ) | | $ | 139,040 |
|
Cash
flow cushion (1) | | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | $ | 7,762 |
|
| |
(1) | See
"Item 6. Selected Financial Data" for additional information regarding non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP financial measures. |
Current Results/Market Commentary
Coal Royalty
and Other Business Segment
Our lessees sold 23.7 million tons of coal from our properties in 2019 and we derived approximately 65% of our coal royalty revenues and approximately 50% of our coal royalty sales volumes from metallurgical coal during the year. We experienced strong coal realizations from our lessees during the first half of 2019, but weakened coal markets and lower activity at certain of our properties negatively impacted our results in the second half of the year. The current market downturn and lessee bankruptcies are expected to put downward pressure on our performance in the coming months.
The market for metallurgical coal weakened and prices for metallurgical coal sold from our
properties declined in 2019. The domestic market for thermal coal remains challenged by low natural gas prices, pressure over emissions and climate change and increasing use of renewable energy. In addition, the export market for thermal coal has weakened due to a combination of lower demand from European utilities, competition from international producers and increasing supply of LNG. While we expect thermal coal will continue to have a role in providing global economies and populations with affordable and reliable energy, we expect these headwinds facing the U.S thermal coal industry will continue.
We remain cautious about the financial position of U.S. coal producers with over-leveraged capital structures and the state of the domestic and global coal markets generally. The current price environment along with limited access to capital has taken a toll on a number of producers. Four of our lessees filed for protection under
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in 2019, and other lessees continue to face challenges. Foresight Energy LP ("Foresight Energy"), which is our largest lessee, has agreed to a forbearance period with its lenders and is engaging with other contract counterparties to evaluate restructuring options. To the extent Foresight Energy determines to idle operations on our properties for a prolonged period or to shut any of its mines on our properties down permanently, or to the extent we agree to amend the terms of our leases with them to facilitate their continued operations on our properties, our business could be adversely affected. Accordingly, we remain focused on further strengthening our liquidity and balance sheet.
Soda Ash Business Segment
Ciner
Wyoming's results are primarily affected by the global supply of and demand for soda ash, which in turn directly impacts the prices Ciner Wyoming and other producers charge for its products. Demand for soda ash in the United States is driven in a large part by economic growth and activity levels in the end markets that the glass-making industry serve, such as the automotive and construction industries. Because the United States is a well-developed market for soda ash, we expect that domestic supply of and demand for soda ash will remain stable for the near future. Soda ash demand in international markets has continued to grow in conjunction with GDP. We expect that future global economic growth will positively influence global demand and pricing over the long term, which will likely result in increased exports, primarily from the United States, Turkey and to a limited extent, from China, the largest suppliers of soda ash to international markets. Over the nearer term,
Ciner Wyoming could face increased costs and competition for customers as a result of its planned exit from ANSAC at the end of 2021.
While the performance of the underlying business remains stable, Ciner Wyoming has announced that it will commence a significant capacity expansion capital project soon that it intends to fund in part by reinvesting cash that would otherwise be distributed to its partners. As a result, we expect for the cash distributions we receive from Ciner Wyoming to remain at approximately $25 million to $28 million per year until the project is funded. We believe that we will benefit over the long-term from increased productivity and cash distributions from Ciner Wyoming’s operations following completion of this capital project.
Business Outlook
We
expect the challenges described above to continue to negatively impact our results. However, we believe the progress made to strengthen our financial profile in recent years positions us well to navigate this downturn.
Results of Operations
Revenues and Other Income
The following table includes our revenues and other income by operating segment:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For
the Year Ended December 31, | | | | |
Operating Segment (In thousands) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | Increase (Decrease) | | Percentage
Change |
Coal Royalty and Other | | $ | 216,846 |
| | $ | 230,206 |
| | $ | (13,360 | ) | | (6 | )% |
Soda
Ash | | 47,089 |
| | 48,306 |
| | (1,217 | ) | | (3 | )% |
Total | | $ | 263,935 |
| | $ | 278,512 |
| | $ | (14,577 | ) | | (5 | )% |
The
changes in revenues and other income is discussed for each of the operating segments below:
Coal Royalty and Other
The following table presents coal sales volumes, coal royalty revenue per ton and coal royalty revenues by major coal producing region, the significant
categories of other revenues and other income:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Year Ended December 31, | | Increase (Decrease) | | Percentage Change |
(In
thousands, except per ton data) | 2019 | | 2018 | |
Coal sales volumes (tons) | | | | | | | |
Appalachia | | | | | | | |
Northern | 3,460 |
| | 3,187 |
| | 273 |
| | 9 | % |
Central | 13,377 |
| | 14,997 |
| | (1,620 | ) | | (11 | )% |
Southern | 1,670 |
| | 1,710 |
| | (40 | ) | | (2 | )% |
Total
Appalachia | 18,507 |
| | 19,894 |
| | (1,387 | ) | | (7 | )% |
Illinois Basin | 2,201 |
| | 2,739 |
| | (538 | ) | | (20 | )% |
Northern
Powder River Basin | 3,036 |
| | 4,313 |
| | (1,277 | ) | | (30 | )% |
Total coal sales volumes | 23,744 |
| | 26,946 |
| | (3,202 | ) | | (12 | )% |
| | | | | | | |
Coal
royalty revenue per ton | | | | | | | |
Appalachia | | | | | | | |
Northern | $ | 1.96 |
| | $ | 2.74 |
| | $ | (0.78 | ) | | (28 | )% |
Central | 5.53 |
| | 5.62 |
| | (0.09 | ) | | (2 | )% |
Southern | 6.69 |
| | 7.20 |
| | (0.51 | ) | | (7 | )% |
Illinois
Basin | 4.66 |
| | 4.63 |
| | 0.03 |
| | 1 | % |
Northern Powder River Basin | 2.90 |
| | 2.65 |
| | 0.25 |
| | 9 | % |
Combined
average coal royalty revenue per ton | 4.67 |
| | 4.80 |
| | (0.13 | ) | | (3 | )% |
| | | | | | | |
Coal
royalty revenues | | | | | | | |
Appalachia | | | | | | | |
Northern | $ | 6,775 |
| | $ | 8,719 |
| | $ | (1,944 | ) | | (22 | )% |
Central | 73,960 |
| | 84,302 |
| | (10,342 | ) | | (12 | )% |
Southern | 11,169 |
| | 12,312 |
| | (1,143 | ) | | (9 | )% |
Total
Appalachia | 91,904 |
| | 105,333 |
| | (13,429 | ) | | (13 | )% |
Illinois Basin | 10,255 |
| | 12,673 |
| | (2,418 | ) | | (19 | )% |
Northern
Powder River Basin | 8,809 |
| | 11,445 |
| | (2,636 | ) | | (23 | )% |
Unadjusted coal royalty revenues | 110,968 |
| | 129,451 |
| | (18,483 | ) | | (14 | )% |
Coal
royalty adjustment for minimum leases | (1,356 | ) | | (110 | ) | | (1,246 | ) | | (1,133 | )% |
Total coal royalty revenues | $ | 109,612 |
| | $ | 129,341 |
| | $ | (19,729 | ) | | (15 | )% |
| | | | | | | |
Other
revenues | | | | | | | |
Production lease minimum revenues | $ | 24,068 |
| | $ | 8,207 |
| | $ | 15,861 |
| | 193 | % |
Minimum
lease straight-line revenues | 14,910 |
| | 2,362 |
| | 12,548 |
| | 531 | % |
Property tax revenues | 6,287 |
| | 5,422 |
| | 865 |
| | 16 | % |
Wheelage
revenues | 5,880 |
| | 6,484 |
| | (604 | ) | | (9 | )% |
Coal overriding royalty revenues | 13,496 |
| | 13,878 |
| | (382 | ) | | (3 | )% |
Lease
amendment revenues | 7,991 |
| | — |
| | 7,991 |
| | 100 | % |
Aggregates royalty revenues | 4,265 |
| | 4,739 |
| | (474 | ) | | (10 | )% |
Oil
and gas royalty revenues | 3,031 |
| | 6,608 |
| | (3,577 | ) | | (54 | )% |
Other revenues | 1,529 |
| | 1,837 |
| | (308 | ) | | (17 | )% |
Total
other revenues | $ | 81,457 |
| | $ | 49,537 |
| | $ | 31,920 |
| | 64 | % |
Coal
royalty and other | $ | 191,069 |
|
| $ | 178,878 |
| | $ | 12,191 |
| | 7 | % |
Transportation
and processing services revenues | 19,279 |
| | 23,887 |
| | (4,608 | ) | | (19 | )% |
Gain on litigation settlement | — |
| | 25,000 |
| | (25,000 | ) | | (100 | )% |
Gain
on asset sales and disposals | 6,498 |
| | 2,441 |
| | 4,057 |
| | 166 | % |
Total Coal Royalty and Other segment revenues and other income | $ | 216,846 |
| | $ | 230,206 |
| | $ | (13,360 | ) | | (6 | )% |
Coal Royalty Revenues
Total coal royalty revenues decreased $19.7 million from 2018 to 2019 driven primarily by lower coal sales volumes. The discussion of these decreases by region is as follows:
| |
• | Appalachia: Sales volumes decreased 7% and
revenues decreased $13.4 million year-over-year. Northern Appalachia includes our Hibbs Run property that has significant sales volumes but a low fixed royalty rate per ton and as a result has a minimal impact on our revenues. Excluding Hibbs Run, sales volumes from our Appalachia properties decreased approximately 11% primarily as a result of weakened coal markets and the temporary idling of certain mines due to lessee bankruptcies. |
| |
• | Illinois Basin: Sales volumes decreased 20% and coal royalty revenues decreased $2.4 million primarily due to weakening of the thermal export market and
lower domestic thermal coal demand in 2019 along with flooding and high water throughout the river systems that affected transportation logistics during the first half of 2019, including at the Convent Marine Terminal on the Gulf of Mexico. |
| |
• | Northern Powder River Basin: Sales volumes decreased 30% and coal royalty revenues decreased $2.6 million primarily due to our lessee mining off of our property in accordance with its mine plan in 2019, partially offset by a 9% increase in sales prices year-over-year. |
Other Revenues
Total
other revenues increased $31.9 million from 2018 to 2019 primarily due to:
| |
• | $15.9 million increased production lease minimum revenues primarily as a result of increased lessee forfeitures of recoupable balances from minimums paid in prior periods. |
| |
• | $12.5 million increased minimum lease straight-line revenues
primarily related to our Hillsboro property that we began to recognize in 2019 after the completion of the Hillsboro litigation settlement with Foresight. |
Transportation and Processing Services Revenues
Transportation and processing services revenues decreased $4.6 million primarily due to weakened demand for Illinois Basin coal that resulted in fewer tons being transported out of our Illinois
Basin transportation and processing assets during the year ended December 31, 2019. Gain on Litigation Settlement
Gain on litigation settlement in the year ended December 31, 2018 related to a one-time payment of $25.0 million we received from Foresight Energy to settle the Hillsboro lawsuit. Gain on Asset Sales and Disposals
Gain on asset sales and disposals increased $4.1 million from 2018 to 2019 primarily due to a disposal of certain mineral right assets during the third quarter of 2019.
Soda Ash
Revenues
and other income related to our Soda Ash segment decreased $1.2 million primarily due to Ciner Wyoming's settlement of a royalty dispute in the second quarter of 2018 that resulted in $12.7 million of income in the prior year, partially offset by an increase in production and sales volumes and increased domestic and international sales prices in the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the prior year.
Operating
and Other Expenses
The following table presents the significant categories of our consolidated operating and other expenses:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, | | Increase
(Decrease) | | Percentage Change |
(In thousands) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | |
Operating expenses | | | | | | | | |
Operating
and maintenance expenses | | $ | 32,738 |
| | $ | 29,509 |
| | $ | 3,229 |
| | 11 | % |
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization | | 14,932 |
| | 21,689 |
| | (6,757 | ) | | (31 | )% |
General and administrative expenses | | 16,730 |
| | 16,496 |
| | 234 |
| | 1 | % |
Asset
impairments | | 148,214 |
| | 18,280 |
| | 129,934 |
| | 711 | % |
Total operating expenses | | $ | 212,614 |
| | $ | 85,974 |
| | $ | 126,640 |
| | 147 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Other
expenses, net | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense, net | | $ | 47,453 |
| | $ | 70,178 |
| | $ | (22,725 | ) | | (32 | )% |
Loss
on extinguishment of debt | | 29,282 |
| | — |
| | 29,282 |
| | 100 | % |
Total other expenses, net | | $ | 76,735 |
| | $ | 70,178 |
| | $ | 6,557 |
| | 9 | % |
Total
operating expenses increased by $126.6 million primarily due to the following:
| |
• | Asset impairments increased $129.9 million from 2018 to 2019. Asset impairments in the year ended December 31, 2019 primarily resulted from deterioration in thermal coal markets, lessee capital constraints, thermal coal lease terminations, and expectations of further reductions in global and domestic thermal coal demand due to low natural gas prices and continued pressure on the electric power generation industry over emissions and climate change, resulting
in reductions in expected cash flows (combination of lower expected coal sales volumes, sales prices, minimums and/or life of mine assumptions) on certain of our mineral rights and intangible assets. Asset impairments in the year ended December 31, 2018 primarily related to a $13.0 million impairment of an aggregates property that we own and lease to our former construction aggregates business, which mines, produces and sells the aggregates, in addition to $5.3 million of impairments related to certain of our coal properties. |
| |
• | Operating and maintenance expenses include costs to manage the Coal Royalty and Other and Soda Ash segments and primarily
consist of royalty, tax, employee-related and legal costs and bad debt expense. These costs increased $3.2 million primarily due to bad debt expense recognized in the second quarter of 2019 related to certain of our Coal Royalty and Other receivables, partially offset by lower legal costs and lower overriding royalty interest fees. |
| |
• | Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense decreased $6.8 million due to lower coal sales volumes at certain properties. |
Total other expenses, net increased
$6.6 million primarily due to the following:
| |
• | Loss on extinguishment of debt was $29.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 and related to the 105.25% premium paid to redeem the 2022 Senior Notes in the second quarter of 2019 as well as the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs and debt discount related to the 2022 Senior Notes. |
| |
• | Interest
expense, net decreased $22.7 million primarily due to lower debt balances in 2019 as a result of debt repayments. |
Income from Discontinued Operations
Income from discontinued operations decreased $16.7 million primarily as a result of the $13.1 million gain on sale of our construction aggregates business in the year ended December 31, 2018 in addition to $4.7 million of income generated by this business in 2018 prior to the sale.
Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP Financial Measure)
The following table reconciles net income (loss) from continuing operations (the most comparable GAAP financial measure) to Adjusted EBITDA by business segment:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Operating
Segments | | | | |
For the Year Ended (In thousands) | | Coal Royalty and Other | | Soda Ash | | Corporate and Financing | | Total |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 21,211 |
| | $ | 46,840 |
| | $ | (93,465 | ) | | $ | (25,414 | ) |
Less:
equity earnings from unconsolidated investment | | — |
| | (47,089 | ) | | — |
| | (47,089 | ) |
Add: total distributions
from unconsolidated investment | | — |
| | 31,850 |
| | — |
| | 31,850 |
|
Add: interest expense, net | | — |
| | — |
| | 47,453 |
| | 47,453 |
|
Add:
loss on extinguishment of debt | | — |
| | — |
| | 29,282 |
| | 29,282 |
|
Add: depreciation, depletion and
amortization | | 14,932 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 14,932 |
|
Add: asset impairments | | 148,214 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 148,214 |
|
Adjusted
EBITDA | | $ | 184,357 |
| | $ | 31,601 |
| | $ | (16,730 | ) | | $ | 199,228 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 160,728 |
| | $ | 48,306 |
| | $ | (86,674 | ) | | $ | 122,360 |
|
Less:
equity earnings from unconsolidated investment | | — |
| | (48,306 | ) | | — |
| | (48,306 | ) |
Less: net income
attributable to non-controlling interest | | (510 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (510 | ) |
Add: total distributions from unconsolidated
investment | | — |
| | 46,550 |
| | — |
| | 46,550 |
|
Add: interest expense, net | | — |
| | — |
| | 70,178 |
| | 70,178 |
|
Add:
depreciation, depletion and amortization | | 21,689 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 21,689 |
|
Add: asset impairments | | 18,280 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 18,280 |
|
Adjusted
EBITDA | | $ | 200,187 |
| | $ | 46,550 |
| | $ | (16,496 | ) | | $ | 230,241 |
|
Adjusted
EBITDA decreased $31.0 million primarily due to the following:
| |
• | Coal Royalty and Other Segment |
| |
◦ | Adjusted EBITDA decreased $15.8 million primarily as a result of the decrease in revenues and other income driven by the weakened coal markets and the $25 million gain on litigation settlement in 2018. |
| |
◦ | Adjusted EBITDA decreased $14.9 million as a result of lower cash distributions received from Ciner Wyoming during the year ended December 31, 2019. The managing partner of Ciner Wyoming decided to reduce distributions during 2019 to fund a multi-year capacity expansion project that is expected to result in higher earnings and distributions. NRP expects to receive approximately $25 million to $28 million of annual cash distributions from Ciner Wyoming until the project is funded. |
Distributable Cash Flow ("DCF"), Free Cash Flow ("FCF") and Cash Flow Cushion (Non-GAAP Financial Measures)
The
following table presents the three major categories of the statement of cash flows by business segment:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Operating Segments | | | | |
For
the Year Ended (In thousands) | | Coal Royalty and Other | | Soda Ash | | Corporate and Financing | | Total |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash
flow provided by (used in) continuing operations | | | | | | | | |
Operating activities | | $ | 178,863 |
| | $ | 31,601 |
| | $ | (73,145 | ) | | $ | 137,319 |
|
Investing
activities | | 8,221 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,221 |
|
Financing activities | | — |
| | — |
| | (253,305 | ) | | (253,305 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flow provided by (used in) continuing operations | | | | | | | | |
Operating
activities | | $ | 212,394 |
| | $ | 44,453 |
| | $ | (78,565 | ) | | $ | 178,282 |
|
Investing
activities | | 5,510 |
| | 2,097 |
| | — |
| | 7,607 |
|
Financing activities | | — |
| | — |
| | (6,839 | ) | | (6,839 | ) |
The
following tables reconcile net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (the most comparable GAAP financial measure) by business segment to DCF, FCF and cash flow cushion:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Operating Segments | | | | |
For
the Year Ended (In thousands) | | Coal Royalty and Other | | Soda Ash | | Corporate and Financing | | Total |
| | | | | | | | |
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations | | $ | 178,863 |
| | $ | 31,601 |
| | $ | (73,145 | ) | | $ | 137,319 |
|
Add:
proceeds from asset sales and disposals | | 6,500 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,500 |
|
Add: proceeds from sale
of discontinued operations | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (629 | ) |
Add: return of long-term contract
receivable | | 1,743 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,743 |
|
Distributable cash flow | | $ | 187,106 |
| | $ | 31,601 |
| | $ | (73,145 | ) | | $ | 144,933 |
|
Less:
proceeds from asset sales and disposals | | (6,500 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (6,500 | ) |
Less: proceeds from sale
of discontinued operations | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 629 |
|
Less: expansion capital expenditures | | (22 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (22 | ) |
Free
cash flow | | $ | 180,584 |
| | $ | 31,601 |
| | $ | (73,145 | ) | | $ | 139,040 |
|
Less:
mandatory Opco debt repayments | | | | | | | | (68,128 | ) |
Less: preferred unit distributions | | | | | | | | (30,000 | ) |
Less:
common unit distributions | | | | | | | | (33,150 | ) |
Cash flow cushion | | | | | | | | $ | 7,762 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Operating Segments | | | | |
For
the Year Ended (In thousands) | | Coal Royalty and Other | | Soda Ash | | Corporate and Financing | | Total |
| | | | | | | | |
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations | | $ | 212,394 |
| | $ | 44,453 |
| | $ | (78,565 | ) | | $ | 178,282 |
|
Add:
distributions from unconsolidated investment in excess of cumulative earnings | | — |
| | 2,097 |
| | — |
| | 2,097 |
|
Add:
proceeds from asset sales and disposals | | 2,449 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,449 |
|
Add: proceeds from sale of
discontinued operations | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 198,091 |
|
Add: return of long-term contract
receivable | | 3,061 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,061 |
|
Distributable cash flow | | $ | 217,904 |
| | $ | 46,550 |
| | $ | (78,565 | ) | | $ | 383,980 |
|
Less:
proceeds from asset sales and disposals | | (2,449 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (2,449 | ) |
Less: proceeds from sale of discontinued
operations | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (198,091 | ) |
Free cash flow | | $ | 215,455 |
| | $ | 46,550 |
| | $ | (78,565 | ) | | $ | 183,440 |
|
Less:
cash flow from one-time Hillsboro litigation settlement | | | | | | | | (25,000 | ) |
Less: mandatory Opco debt repayments | | | | | | | | (80,765 | ) |
Less:
preferred unit distributions and redemption of PIK units | | | | | | | | (39,109 | ) |
Less: common unit distributions | | | | | | | | (22,486 | ) |
Cash
flow cushion | | | | | | | | $ | 16,080 |
|
DCF and FCF decreased $239.0 million and $44.4
million, respectively, primarily due to the following:
| |
• | Coal Royalty and Other Segment |
| |
◦ | DCF and FCF decreased $30.8 million and $34.9 million, respectively, primarily due to a one-time $25 million payment we received from Foresight Energy to settle the Hillsboro lawsuit in 2018 and lower coal royalty revenues as described above, partially offset by increased cash from
the receipt of lease amendment fees and Hillsboro minimum payments in 2019. |
| |
◦ | DCF and FCF decreased $14.9 million as a result of lower cash distributions received from Ciner Wyoming during the year ended December 31, 2019. |
| |
• | Corporate
and Financing Segment |
| |
◦ | DCF and FCF increased $5.4 million primarily due to lower cash paid for interest in 2019 as a result of lower debt balances during 2019. |
Total DCF for the year ended December 31, 2018 was also impacted by the $198.1 million proceeds from the sale of our construction aggregates business in 2018. Cash flow cushion decreased $8.3 million as a result of the decrease in FCF discussed above (excluding the impact of the $25 million
Hillsboro payment) and a $10.7 million increase in common unit distributions made in 2019 primarily as a result of a one-time special distribution of $0.85 per common unit. These decreases in 2019 cash flow cushion were partially offset by a $12.6 million decrease in mandatory Opco debt repayments as a result of the lower principal balances on the Opco Senior Notes and a $9.1 million decrease in preferred unit distributions primarily as a result of the $8.8 million redemption of PIK units in 2018.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Current Liquidity
As
of December 31, 2019, we had total liquidity of $198.3 million, consisting of $98.3 million of cash and cash equivalents and $100.0 million in borrowing capacity under our Opco Credit Facility. Cash Flows
Cash flows provided by operating activities decreased
$51.6 million, from $188.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 to $137.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 primarily related to a one-time $25 million payment we received from Foresight Energy in 2018 to settle the Hillsboro lawsuit, $12.6 million of lower cash distributions received from Ciner Wyoming in 2019, $10.6 million lower cash provided as a result of the sale of our construction aggregates business in the fourth quarter of 2018 and lower coal royalty revenues driven by weakened coal markets and the temporary idling of certain mines. These decreases in cash provided by operating activities were partially offset by the
collection of Hillsboro minimum payments, lease amendment fees and $6.4 million lower cash paid for interest as a result of lower debt balances in 2019.
Cash flows provided by investing activities decreased $183.0 million, from $190.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 to $7.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2019. Cash flows from discontinued operations decreased $183.7 million as a result of the $198.1 million proceeds received from the sale of our construction aggregates business in December 2018, partially offset by $10.9 million of
construction aggregates capital expenditures during 2018. Cash flows from continuing operations was relatively flat year-over-year as the $4.1 million increase in proceeds from asset sales and disposals was partially offset by a portion of our distribution from Ciner Wyoming classified as an investing activity in 2018 and a lower return of our long-term contract receivable in 2019.
Cash flows used in financing activities increased $49.3 million, from $203.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 to $252.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2019.
In the second quarter of 2019, we extended the maturity date of the $100 million Opco Credit Facility to April 2023 and issued $300 million of a new series of 9.125% senior notes due 2025. We used the net proceeds from this offering, together with $76 million of cash on hand to redeem all of our 2022 Senior Notes. As a result of these transactions, our outstanding debt was reduced, our annual interest expense has decreased, and our debt maturities were extended. Significant increases in cash flow used in financing activities included the following: | |
• | $345.6 million used for the redemption of our 2022 Senior Notes in the second quarter of 2019; |
| |
• | $36.7
million increase in payments on the Opco Senior Notes primarily as a result of the prepayment made using proceeds from the sale of our construction aggregates business; |
| |
• | $35.0 million less borrowings on our Opco Credit Facility in 2019 compared to the prior year period; |
| |
• | $26.2 million increase in debt issuance costs and other primarily related to the 2019 debt refinancings; and |
| |
• | $10.7
million increase in common unit distributions made in 2019 primarily as a result of a one-time special distribution of $0.85 per common unit. |
These increases in cash flows used in financing activities were partially offset by the following:
| |
• | $300 million provided by the issuance of the 2025 Senior Notes in the second quarter of 2019; |
| |
• | $95 million less cash used in 2019 compared to the prior year as a result of the repayment of the Opco Credit Facility during the fourth quarter
of 2018; and |
| |
• | $8.8 million less cash used in 2019 compared to the prior year as a result of the redemption of preferred units paid-in-kind in the first quarter of 2018. |
Capital Resources and Obligations
Debt, Net
|
| | | | | | | |
| December
31, |
(In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 |
Current portion of long-term debt, net | $ | 45,776 |
| | $ | 115,184 |
|
Long-term
debt, net | 470,422 |
| | 557,574 |
|
Total debt, net | $ | 516,198 |
| | $ | 672,758 |
|
We have been and continue to be in compliance with the terms of the financial covenants contained in our debt agreements. For additional information regarding our debt and the agreements governing our debt, including the covenants contained therein, see "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 12. Debt, Net" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Long-Term Contractual Obligations
The following table reflects our long-term, non-cancelable contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Payments
Due by Period |
Contractual Obligations (In thousands) | | Total | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2024 | | Thereafter |
NRP: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term
debt principal payments (1) | | $ | 300,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 300,000 |
|
Long-term
debt interest payments (1) | | 150,563 |
| | 27,375 |
| | 27,375 |
| | 27,375 |
| | 27,375 |
| | 27,375 |
| | 13,688 |
|
Opco: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term
debt principal payments (including current maturities) (2) | | 224,056 |
| | 46,176 |
| | 39,396 |
| | 39,396 |
| | 39,396 |
| | 31,028 |
| | 28,664 |
|
Long-term
debt interest payments (3) | | 39,865 |
| | 12,447 |
| | 9,868 |
| | 7,631 |
| | 5,020 |
| | 2,724 |
| | 2,175 |
|
Rental
leases (4) | | 14,012 |
| | 483 |
| | 483 |
| | 483 |
| | 483 |
| | 483 |
| | 11,597 |
|
Total | | $ | 728,496 |
| | $ | 86,481 |
| | $ | 77,122 |
| | $ | 74,885 |
| | $ | 72,274 |
| | $ | 61,610 |
| | $ | 356,124 |
|
| |
(1) | The
amounts indicated in the table include principal and interest due on NRP’s 2025 Senior Notes. |
| |
(2) | The amounts indicated in the table include principal due on Opco’s senior notes. |
| |
(3) | The amounts indicated in the table include interest due on Opco’s senior notes and the 0.50% annual commitment fee on the unused portion of the Opco Credit Facility, which matures in April 2023. At December 31, 2019
we did not have any borrowings outstanding under the Opco Credit Facility and had $100 million in available borrowing capacity. |
| |
(4) | On January 1, 2019, Opco entered into a lease agreement for the rental of office space from Western Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership for $0.5 million per year. Not included in this table is approximately $0.3 million of annual operating expenses Opco is obligated to pay to Western Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership in connection with this lease. The lease has a five-year base term and five additional five-year
renewal options. Upon lease commencement and as of December 31, 2019, the Partnership was reasonably certain to exercise all renewal options included in the lease and have included rental payments in the table through 2048. |
Off-Balance Sheet Transactions
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or related parties and accordingly, there are no off-balance sheet risks to our liquidity and capital resources from unconsolidated entities.
Inflation
Inflation in the United States has been relatively low in recent years and did not have a material impact on operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Environmental Regulation
Related Party Transactions
Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. See "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 2. Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies" in the audited Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-K for discussion of our significant accounting policies. The following critical accounting policies are affected by estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on a regular basis. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenues
Coal Royalty and Other Segment Revenues
Royalty-based leases. Approximately two-thirds of the our royalty-based leases have initial terms of five to 40 years, with substantially all
lessees having the option to extend the lease for additional terms. For these types of leases, the lessees generally make payments to us based on the greater of a percentage of the gross sales price or a fixed price per ton of mineral mined and sold. Most of our coal and aggregates royalty leases require the lessee to pay quarterly or annual minimum amounts, either made in advance or arrears, which are generally recoupable through actual royalty production over certain time periods that generally range from three to five years.
In accordance with previous accounting standards in effect prior to January 1, 2018, we recognized all coal and aggregates royalty revenues over the lease term based on production. The recognition of revenue from minimum payments was deferred until either recoupment
through royalty production occurred or when the recoupment period expired for unrecouped minimums. In accordance with the accounting standard in effect subsequent to January 1, 2018 ("ASC 606"), we have defined our coal and aggregates royalty lease performance obligation as providing the lessee the right to mine and sell our coal or aggregates over the lease term. We then evaluated the likelihood that consideration we expected to receive from our lessees resulting from production would exceed consideration expected to be received from minimum payments over the lease term. As a result of this evaluation, revenue recognition from our royalty-based leases is based on either production or minimum payments as follows:
| |
• | Production
Leases: Leases for which we expect that consideration from production will be greater than consideration from minimums over the lease term. Revenue recognition for these leases is recognized over time based on production as coal royalty revenues or aggregates royalty revenues, as applicable. Deferred revenue from minimums is recognized as royalty revenues when recoupment occurs or as production lease minimum revenues when the recoupment period expires. In addition, we recognize breakage revenue from minimums when we determine that recoupment is remote. This breakage revenue is included in production lease minimum revenues. |
| |
• | Minimum Leases: Leases for which we expect that consideration from minimums
will be greater than consideration from production over the lease term. Revenue recognition for these leases is recognized straight-line over the lease term based on the minimum consideration amount as minimum lease straight-line revenues. |
This evaluation is performed at the inception of the lease and only reassessed upon modification or renewal of the lease.
Oil and gas related revenues consist of revenues from royalties and overriding royalties
and are recognized on the basis of volume of hydrocarbons sold by lessees and the corresponding revenues from those sales. Also included within oil and gas royalty revenues are lease bonus payments, which are generally paid upon the execution of a lease. We also have overriding royalty revenue interests in coal reserves. Revenues from these interests is recognized over time based on when the coal is sold.
Wheelage revenues. Revenues related to fees collected per ton to transport foreign coal across property we own that is recognized over time as transportation across our property occurs.
Other revenues. Other revenues consists primarily of rental payments and surface damage fees related to certain land we own and is recognized straight-line over time as it is earned. Other revenues also include property tax revenues. The majority
of property taxes paid on our properties are reimbursable by the lessee and are recognized on a gross basis over time which reflects the reimbursement of property taxes by the lessee. Property taxes we pay are included in operating and maintenance expenses on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Transportation and processing services revenues. We own transportation and processing infrastructure that is leased to third parties for throughput fees. Revenue is recognized over time based on the coal tons transported over the beltlines or processed through the facilities.
Contract modifications
that impact goods or services or the transaction price are evaluated in accordance with ASC 606. A majority of our contract modifications pertain to our coal and aggregates royalty contracts and include, but are not limited to, extending the lease term, changes to royalty rates, floor prices or minimum consideration, assignment of the contract or forfeiture of recoupment rights. Consideration received in conjunction with a modification of an ongoing lease will be deferred and recognized straight-line over the remaining term of the contract. Consideration received to assign a lease to another party and related
forfeited minimums will be recognized immediately upon the termination of the contract. Fees from contract modifications are recognized in lease amendment revenues within coal royalty and other revenues on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) while modifications in royalty rates and minimums will be recognized prospectively in accordance with the above lease classification. Contract
assets include receivables from contracts with customers and are recorded when the right to consideration becomes unconditional. Receivables are recognized when the minimums are contractually owed, production occurs or minimums are accrued for based on the passage of time. Contract liabilities represent minimum consideration received, contractually owed or earned based on the passage of time. The current portion of deferred revenue relates to deferred revenue on minimum leases and lease amendment fees that are to be recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the next twelve months. The long-term portion of deferred revenue relates to deferred revenue on production leases and lease amendment fees that are to be recognized as revenue on
a straight-line basis beyond the next twelve months. Due to uncertainty in the amount of deferred revenue that will be recouped and recognized as coal royalty revenues from production leases over the next twelve months, we are unable to estimate the current portion of deferred revenue. Equity in Earnings of Ciner Wyoming.
We account for non-marketable equity investments using the equity method of accounting if the investment gives it the ability to exercise significant influence over, but not control of, an investee. Our 49% investment in Ciner Wyoming is accounted for using this method. Under the equity method of accounting, investments are stated at initial cost and are adjusted for subsequent additional investments and the proportionate share of earnings or losses and distributions. The basis difference between the investment and
the proportional share of investee's net assets is attributed to net tangible assets and is amortized over its estimated useful life. The carrying value in Ciner Wyoming is recognized in equity in unconsolidated investment on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our adjusted share of the earnings or losses of Ciner Wyoming and amortization of the basis difference is recognized in equity in earnings of Ciner Wyoming on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). We decrease our investment
for
our proportional share of distributions received from Ciner Wyoming. These cash flows are reported utilizing the cumulative earnings approach. Under this approach, distributions received are considered returns on investment and classified as operating cash inflows unless the cumulative distributions received exceed our cumulative equity in earnings. The excess of cumulative distributions received over our cumulative equity in earnings are considered returns of investment and classified as investing cash inflows.
Mineral Rights
Mineral rights owned and leased are recorded at its original cost of construction or, upon acquisition, at fair value of the assets acquired. Coal and aggregates mineral rights are depleted on a unit-of-production basis by lease, based upon minerals mined in relation to the net cost of the mineral properties and estimated proven and probable tonnage as defined
by the SEC’s Industry Guide 7 and estimated by our internal reserve engineers. The technologies and economic data used by our internal reserve engineers in the estimation of our proved reserves include, but are not limited to, drill logs, geophysical logs, geologic maps including isopach, mine, and coal quality, cross sections, statistical analysis, and available public production data. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating the quantities and qualities of recoverable reserves, including many factors beyond our control. Estimates of economically recoverable coal reserves depend upon a number of variable factors and assumptions, any one of which may, if incorrect, result in an estimate that varies considerably from actual results.
Asset Impairment
We have developed procedures to evaluate our long-lived assets for possible
impairment periodically or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an asset's net book value may not be recoverable. Potential events or circumstances include, but are not limited to, specific events such as a reduction in economically recoverable reserves or production ceasing on a property for an extended period. A long-lived asset is deemed impaired when the future expected undiscounted cash flows from its use and disposition is less than the asset's net book value. Impairment is measured based on the estimated fair value, which is usually determined based upon the present value of the projected future cash flow compared to the asset's net book value. We believe our estimates of cash flows and discount rates are consistent with those of principal market participants.
We evaluate our equity investment for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate,
in management’s judgment, that the carrying value of such investment may have experienced an other-than-temporary decline in value. When evidence of loss in value has occurred, management compares the estimated fair value of the investment to the carrying value of the investment to determine whether impairment has occurred. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying value and management considers the decline in value to be other than temporary, the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value is recognized in the financial statements as an impairment loss. The fair value of the impaired investment is based on quoted market prices, or upon the present value of expected cash flows using discount rates believed to be consistent with those used by principal market participants, plus market analysis of comparable assets owned by the investee, if appropriate.
Recent
Accounting Standards
ITEM
7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risk, which includes adverse changes in commodity prices and interest rates as discussed below:
Commodity Price Risk
Our revenues, operating results, financial condition and ability to borrow funds or obtain additional capital depend substantially on prevailing commodity prices. Historically, coal prices have been volatile, with prices fluctuating widely, and they are likely to continue to be volatile. Depressed prices in the future would have a negative impact on our future financial results. In particular, substantially lower prices would significantly reduce revenues and could potentially trigger an impairment
of our coal properties or a violation of certain financial debt covenants. Because substantially all of our reserves are coal, changes in coal prices have a more significant impact on our financial results.
We are dependent upon the effective marketing of the coal mined by our lessees. Our lessees sell the coal under various long-term and short-term contracts as well as on the spot market. Current conditions in the coal industry may make it difficult for our lessees to extend existing contracts or enter into supply contracts with terms of one year or more. Our lessees’ failure to negotiate long-term contracts
could adversely affect the stability and profitability of our lessees’ operations and adversely affect our future financial results. If more coal is sold on the spot market, coal royalty revenues may become more volatile due to fluctuations in spot coal prices. The market price of soda ash and energy costs directly affects the profitability of Ciner Wyoming’s operations. If the market price for soda ash declines, Ciner Wyoming’s sales revenues will decrease. Historically, the global market and, to a lesser extent, the domestic market for soda ash have been volatile and are likely to remain volatile in the future.
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to changes in interest rates results from our borrowings under the Opco Credit Facility, which is subject to variable interest rates based upon LIBOR. At December 31,
2019 we did not have any borrowings outstanding under the Opco Credit Facility. Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities
Our financial assets and liabilities consist of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, contract receivable and debt. The carrying amounts reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash approximate fair value due to their short-term nature. We use available market data and valuation methodologies to estimate the fair value of our debt and contract receivable. The following table shows the carrying amount and estimated fair value of our debt and contract
receivable: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 |
(In
thousands) | Fair Value Hierarchy Level | | Carrying Value | | Estimated
Fair Value | | Carrying
Value | | Estimated
Fair Value |
Debt: | | | | | | | | | |
NRP
2025 Senior Notes | 1 | | $ | 294,084 |
| | $ | 269,250 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
NRP
2022 Senior Notes | 1 | | — |
| | — |
| | 334,024 |
| | 356,871 |
|
Opco
Senior Notes | 3 | | 222,114 |
| | 201,090 |
| | 338,734 |
| | 352,599 |
|
Opco
Credit Facility | 3 | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
Contract
receivable (current and long-term) | 3 | | $ | 38,945 |
| | $ | 33,460 |
| | $ | 40,776 |
| | $ | 34,704 |
|
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Partners of Natural Resource
Partners L.P.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Natural Resource Partners L.P. (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Partnership at December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We did not audit the financial statements of Ciner Wyoming LLC (Ciner Wyoming), a limited liability company in which the Partnership has a 49% interest. In the consolidated financial statements, the Partnership’s investment in Ciner Wyoming is stated at $263 million and $247 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and the Partnership’s equity in the net income of Ciner Wyoming is stated at
$47 million in 2019, $48 million in 2018 and $40 million in 2017. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Ciner Wyoming, is based solely on the report of the other auditors.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated February 27, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Adoption
of ASU No. 2014-09
The Partnership adopted ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” effective January 1, 2018. As a result, for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019, the Partnership changed its method for revenue recognition related to royalty lease arrangements.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership’s
financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have served as the Partnership’s auditor since 2002.
Houston, Texas
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Managers and Members of
Ciner Wyoming LLC
Atlanta, Georgia
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Ciner Wyoming LLC (“the
Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related statements of operations and comprehensive income, members’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes included in Exhibit 99.1 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31,
2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements
based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB and in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company
is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Atlanta, Georgia
NATURAL
RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
(In thousands, except unit data) | 2019 | | 2018 |
ASSETS | | | |
Current
assets | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 98,265 |
| | $ | 101,839 |
|
Restricted cash | — |
| | 104,191 |
|
Accounts
receivable, net | 30,869 |
| | 32,058 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other, net | 1,244 |
| | 3,462 |
|
Current assets of discontinued operations | 1,706 |
| | 993 |
|
Total
current assets | $ | 132,084 |
| | $ | 242,543 |
|
Land | 24,008 |
| | 24,008 |
|
Mineral
rights, net | 605,096 |
| | 743,112 |
|
Intangible assets, net | 17,687 |
| | 42,513 |
|
Equity in unconsolidated investment | 263,080 |
| | 247,051 |
|
| 36,963 |
| | 38,945 |
|
Other assets, net | 6,989 |
| | 3,475 |
|
Total
assets | $ | 1,085,907 |
| | $ | 1,341,647 |
|
LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL | | | |
Current liabilities | | | |
Accounts
payable | $ | 1,179 |
| | $ | 2,414 |
|
Accrued liabilities | 8,764 |
| | 12,347 |
|
Accrued
interest | 2,316 |
| | 14,345 |
|
Current portion of deferred revenue | 4,608 |
| | 3,509 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt, net | 45,776 |
| | 115,184 |
|
Current
liabilities of discontinued operations | 65 |
| | 947 |
|
Total current liabilities | $ | 62,708 |
| | $ | 148,746 |
|
Deferred
revenue | 47,213 |
| | 49,044 |
|
Long-term debt, net | 470,422 |
| | 557,574 |
|
Other non-current liabilities | 4,949 |
| | 1,150 |
|
Total
liabilities | $ | 585,292 |
| | $ | 756,514 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 16) | | | |
Class A Convertible Preferred Units (250,000 units issued and outstanding at $1,000 par value
per unit; liquidation preference of $1,500 per unit) | $ | 164,587 |
| | $ | 164,587 |
|
Partners’ capital | | | |
Common unitholders’ interest (12,261,199 and 12,249,469 units issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively) | $ | 271,471 |
| | $ | 355,113 |
|
General partner’s interest | 3,270 |
| | 5,014 |
|
Warrant
holders’ interest | 66,816 |
| | 66,816 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (2,594 | ) | | (3,462 | ) |
Total partners’ capital | $ | 338,963 |
| | $ | 423,481 |
|
Non-controlling
interest | (2,935 | ) | | (2,935 | ) |
Total capital | $ | 336,028 |
| | $ | 420,546 |
|
Total
liabilities and capital | $ | 1,085,907 |
| | $ | 1,341,647 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
NATURAL
RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Years Ended December 31, |
(In thousands, except per unit data) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Revenues
and other income | | | | | |
Coal royalty and other | $ | 191,069 |
| | $ | 178,878 |
| | $ | 181,801 |
|
Transportation
and processing services | 19,279 |
| | 23,887 |
| | 20,522 |
|
Equity in earnings of Ciner Wyoming | 47,089 |
| | 48,306 |
| | 40,457 |
|
Gain
on litigation settlement | — |
| | 25,000 |
| | — |
|
Gain on asset sales and disposals | 6,498 |
| | 2,441 |
| | 3,545 |
|
Total
revenues and other income | $ | 263,935 |
|
| $ | 278,512 |
|
| $ | 246,325 |
|
| | | | | |
Operating
expenses | | | | | |
Operating and maintenance expenses | $ | 32,738 |
| | $ | 29,509 |
| | $ | 24,883 |
|
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization | 14,932 |
| | 21,689 |
| | 23,414 |
|
General and administrative expenses | 16,730 |
| | 16,496 |
| | 18,502 |
|
Asset
impairments | 148,214 |
| | 18,280 |
| | 2,967 |
|
Total operating expenses | $ | 212,614 |
| | $ | 85,974 |
| | $ | 69,766 |
|
| | | | | |
Income
from operations | $ | 51,321 |
| | $ | 192,538 |
| | $ | 176,559 |
|
| | | | | |
Other
expenses, net | | | | | |
Interest expense, net | $ | (47,453 | ) | | $ | (70,178 | ) | | $ | (82,028 | ) |
Debt
modification expense | — |
| | — |
| | (7,939 | ) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt | (29,282 | ) | | — |
| | (4,107 | ) |
Total
other expenses, net | $ | (76,735 | ) | | $ | (70,178 | ) | | $ | (94,074 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net
income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (25,414 | ) | | $ | 122,360 |
| | $ | 82,485 |
|
Income from discontinued operations (see Note 4) | 956 |
| | 17,687 |
| | 6,182 |
|
Net
income (loss) | $ | (24,458 | ) | | $ | 140,047 |
| | $ | 88,667 |
|
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest | — |
| | (510 | ) | | — |
|
Net
income (loss) attributable to NRP | $ | (24,458 | ) | | $ | 139,537 |
| | $ | 88,667 |
|
Less: income attributable to preferred unitholders | (30,000 | ) | | (30,000 | ) | | (25,453 | ) |
Net
income (loss) attributable to common unitholders and general partner | $ | (54,458 | ) | | $ | 109,537 |
| | $ | 63,214 |
|
| | |
|
| | |
Net
income (loss) attributable to common unitholders | $ | (53,369 | ) | | $ | 107,346 |
| | $ | 61,950 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the general partner | (1,089 | ) | | 2,191 |
| | 1,264 |
|
| | | | | |
Income
(loss) from continuing operations per common unit (see Note 7) | | | | | |
Basic | $ | (4.43 | ) | | $ | 7.35 |
| | $ | 4.57 |
|
Diluted | (4.43 | ) | | 5.90 |
| | 3.68 |
|
| | | | | |
Net
income (loss) per common unit (see Note 7) | | | | | |
Basic | $ | (4.35 | ) | | $ | 8.77 |
| | $ | 5.06 |
|
Diluted | (4.35 | ) | | 6.76 |
| | 3.96 |
|
| | | | | |
Net
income (loss) | $ | (24,458 | ) | | $ | 140,047 |
| | $ | 88,667 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) from unconsolidated investment and other | 868 |
| | (149 | ) | | (1,647 | ) |
Comprehensive
income (loss) | $ | (23,590 | ) | | $ | 139,898 |
| | $ | 87,020 |
|
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest | — |
| | (510 | ) | | — |
|
Comprehensive
income (loss) attributable to NRP | $ | (23,590 | ) | | $ | 139,388 |
| | $ | 87,020 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common
Unitholders | | General Partner | | Warrant Holders | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss | | Partners' Capital Excluding Non-Controlling Interest | | Non-Controlling Interest | | Total
Capital |
|
(In thousands) | Units | | Amounts | |
| 12,232 |
| | $ | 152,309 |
| | $ | 887 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (1,666 | ) | | $ | 151,530 |
| | $ | (3,394 | ) | | $ | 148,136 |
|
Net
income (1) | — |
| | 86,894 |
| | 1,773 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 88,667 |
| | — |
| | 88,667 |
|
Distributions
to common unitholders and general partner | — |
| | (22,018 | ) | | (449 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (22,467 | ) | | — |
| | (22,467 | ) |
Distributions
to preferred unitholders | — |
| | (17,334 | ) | | (354 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (17,688 | ) | | — |
| | (17,688 | ) |
Issuance
of warrants | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 66,816 |
| | — |
| | 66,816 |
| | — |
| | 66,816 |
|
Comprehensive
loss from unconsolidated investment and other | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,647 | ) | | (1,647 | ) | | — |
| | (1,647 | ) |
| 12,232 |
| | $ | 199,851 |
| | $ | 1,857 |
| | $ | 66,816 |
| | $ | (3,313 | ) | | $ | 265,211 |
| | $ | (3,394 | ) | | $ | 261,817 |
|
Cumulative
effect of adoption of accounting standard | — |
| | 69,057 |
| | 1,409 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 70,466 |
| | — |
| | 70,466 |
|
Net
income (2) | — |
| | 136,746 |
| | 2,791 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 139,537 |
| | 510 |
| | 140,047 |
|
Distributions
to common unitholders and general partner | — |
| | (22,036 | ) | | (450 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (22,486 | ) | | — |
| | (22,486 | ) |
Distributions
to preferred unitholders | — |
| | (29,660 | ) | | (605 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (30,265 | ) | | — |
| | (30,265 | ) |
Issuance
of unit-based awards | 17 |
| | 546 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 546 |
| | — |
| | 546 |
|
Unit-based
awards amortization and vesting | — |
| | 560 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 560 |
| | — |
| | 560 |
|
Comprehensive
income (loss) from unconsolidated investment and other | — |
| | 49 |
| | 12 |
| | — |
| | (149 | ) | | (88 | ) | | (51 | ) | | (139 | ) |
| 12,249 |
| | $ | 355,113 |
| | $ | 5,014 |
| | $ | 66,816 |
| | $ | (3,462 | ) | | $ | 423,481 |
| | $ | (2,935 | ) | | $ | 420,546 |
|
Net
loss (2) | — |
| | (23,969 | ) | | (489 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (24,458 | ) | | — |
| | (24,458 | ) |
Distributions
to common unitholders and general partner | — |
| | (32,487 | ) | | (663 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (33,150 | ) | | — |
| | (33,150 | ) |
Distributions
to preferred unitholders | — |
| | (29,400 | ) | | (600 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (30,000 | ) | | — |
| | (30,000 | ) |
Issuance
of unit-based awards | 12 |
| | 486 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 486 |
| | — |
| | 486 |
|
Unit-based
awards amortization and vesting | — |
| | 1,804 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,804 |
| | — |
| | 1,804 |
|
Comprehensive
income (loss) from unconsolidated investment and other | — |
| | (76 | ) | | 8 |
| | — |
| | 868 |
| | 800 |
| | — |
| | 800 |
|
| 12,261 |
| | $ | 271,471 |
| | $ | 3,270 |
| | $ | 66,816 |
| | $ | (2,594 | ) | | $ | 338,963 |
| | $ | (2,935 | ) | | $ | 336,028 |
|
| |
(1) | Net
income includes $25.5 million attributable to preferred unitholders that accumulated during the period, of which $24.9 million is allocated to the common unitholders and $0.5 million is allocated to the general partner. |
| |
(2) | Net income (loss) includes $30.0 million attributable to preferred unitholders that accumulated during the period, of which $29.4 million is allocated to the common unitholders and $0.6 million is allocated to the general partner. |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years
Ended December 31, |
(In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Cash flows from operating activities | | | | | |
Net
income (loss) | $ | (24,458 | ) | | $ | 140,047 |
| | $ | 88,667 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations: | | | | | |
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization | 14,932 |
| | 21,689 |
| | 23,414 |
|
Distributions from unconsolidated investment | 31,850 |
| | 44,453 |
| | 43,354 |
|
Equity
earnings from unconsolidated investment | (47,089 | ) | | (48,306 | ) | | (40,457 | ) |
Gain on asset sales and disposals | (6,498 | ) | | (2,441 | ) | | (3,545 | ) |
Debt
modification expense | — |
| | — |
| | 7,939 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt | 29,282 |
| | — |
| | 4,107 |
|
Income
from discontinued operations | (956 | ) | | (17,687 | ) | | (6,182 | ) |
Asset impairments | 148,214 |
| | 18,280 |
| | 2,967 |
|
Bad
debt expense | 7,462 |
| | (62 | ) | | 2,353 |
|
Unit-based compensation expense | 2,361 |
| | 1,434 |
| | 18 |
|
Amortization
of debt issuance costs and other | 3,687 |
| | 7,133 |
| | 10,284 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
Accounts
receivable | (6,035 | ) | | (6,062 | ) | | 3,919 |
|
Accounts payable | (1,234 | ) | | 1,138 |
| | (184 | ) |
Accrued
liabilities | (3,656 | ) | | 19 |
| | (7,963 | ) |
Accrued interest | (12,029 | ) | | (1,138 | ) | | (105 | ) |
Deferred
revenue | (732 | ) | | 19,465 |
| | (15,957 | ) |
Other items, net | 2,218 |
| | 320 |
| | (478 | ) |
Net
cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations | $ | 137,319 |
| | $ | 178,282 |
| | $ | 112,151 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of discontinued operations | (8 | ) | | 10,641 |
| | 14,988 |
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities | $ | 137,311 |
| | $ | 188,923 |
| | $ | 127,139 |
|
| | | | | |
Cash
flows from investing activities | | | | | |
Distributions from unconsolidated investment in excess of cumulative earnings | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,097 |
| | $ | 5,646 |
|
Proceeds
from asset sales and disposals | 6,500 |
| | 2,449 |
| | 1,151 |
|
Return of long-term contract receivables | 1,743 |
| | 3,061 |
| | 3,010 |
|
Acquisition
of mineral rights | (22 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Net cash provided by investing activities of continuing operations | $ | 8,221 |
| | $ | 7,607 |
| | $ | 9,807 |
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities of discontinued operations | (629 | ) | | 183,021 |
| | (6,264 | ) |
Net cash provided by investing activities | $ | 7,592 |
| | $ | 190,628 |
| | $ | 3,543 |
|
NATURAL
RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
(In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | | | | |
Cash
flows from financing activities | | | | | |
Proceeds from issuance of preferred units and warrants, net | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 242,100 |
|
Debt
borrowings | 300,000 |
| | 35,000 |
| | 180,688 |
|
Debt repayments | (463,082 | ) | | (175,706 | ) | | (492,319 | ) |
Redemption
of preferred units paid-in-kind | — |
| | (8,844 | ) | | — |
|
Distributions to common unitholders and general partner | (33,150 | ) | | (22,486 | ) | | (22,467 | ) |
Distributions
to preferred unitholders | (30,000 | ) | | (30,265 | ) | | (8,844 | ) |
Contributions from (to) discontinued operations | (637 | ) | | 195,690 |
| | 5,784 |
|
Debt
issuance costs and other | (26,436 | ) | | (228 | ) | | (39,091 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities of continuing operations | $ | (253,305 | ) | | $ | (6,839 | ) | | $ | (134,149 | ) |
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities of discontinued operations | 637 |
| | (196,509 | ) | | (7,077 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | $ | (252,668 | ) | | $ | (203,348 | ) | | $ | (141,226 | ) |
Net
increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | $ | (107,765 | ) | | $ | 176,203 |
| | $ | (10,544 | ) |
| | | | | |
Cash,
cash equivalents and restricted cash of continuing operations at beginning of period | $ | 206,030 |
| | $ | 26,980 |
| | $ | 39,171 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations at beginning of period | — |
| | 2,847 |
| | 1,200 |
|
Cash,
cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period | $ | 206,030 |
| | $ | 29,827 |
| | $ | 40,371 |
|
| | | | | |
Cash,
cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period | $ | 98,265 |
| | $ | 206,030 |
| | $ | 29,827 |
|
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations at end of period | — |
| | — |
| | (2,847 | ) |
Cash,
cash equivalents and restricted cash of continuing operations at end of period | $ | 98,265 |
| | $ | 206,030 |
| | $ | 26,980 |
|
| | | | | |
Supplemental
cash flow information: | | | | | |
Cash paid during the period for interest of continuing operations | $ | 58,597 |
| | $ | 64,991 |
| | $ | 72,850 |
|
Non-cash
investing and financing activities: | | | | | |
Issuance of 2022 Senior Notes in exchange for 2018 Senior Notes | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 240,638 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Organization and Nature of Operations
Natural Resource Partners L.P. (the "Partnership"), a Delaware limited partnership, was formed in April 2002. The general partner of the Partnership is NRP (GP) LP ("NRP GP"),
a Delaware limited partnership, whose general partner is GP Natural Resource Partners LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. The Partnership engages principally in the business of owning, managing and leasing a diversified portfolio of mineral properties in the United States, including interests in coal and other natural resources and owns a non-controlling 49% interest in Ciner Wyoming LLC ("Ciner Wyoming"), a trona ore mining and soda ash production business. The Partnership is organized into two operating segments further described in Note 8. Segment Information. As used in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the terms "NRP,"
"we," "us" and "our" refer to Natural Resource Partners L.P. and its subsidiaries, unless otherwise stated or indicated by context. The Partnership’s operations are conducted through, and its operating assets are owned by, its subsidiaries. The Partnership owns its subsidiaries through one wholly owned operating company, NRP (Operating) LLC ("Opco"). NRP GP has sole responsibility for conducting the Partnership's business and for managing its operations. Because NRP GP is a limited partnership, its general partner, GP
Natural Resource Partners LLC, conducts its business and operations, and the board of directors and officers of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC makes decisions on its behalf. Robertson Coal Management LLC ("RCM"), a limited liability company wholly owned by Corbin J. Robertson, Jr., owns all of the membership interest in GP Natural Resource Partners LLC. Subject to the Board Representation and Observation Rights Agreement with certain entities controlled by funds affiliated with The Blackstone Group Inc. (collectively referred to as "Blackstone") and affiliates of GoldenTree Asset Management LP (collectively referred to as "GoldenTree"), RCM is entitled to appoint the directors of the Board
of Directors of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC (the "Board of Directors"). RCM has delegated the right to appoint one director to Blackstone.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of the Partnership have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("GAAP"). The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Natural Resource Partners L.P. and its wholly owned subsidiaries,
as well as BRP LLC ("BRP"), a joint venture with International Paper Company controlled by the Partnership. The Partnership has an equity investment in Ciner Wyoming through which it is able to exercise significant influence over but does not control the investee and is not the primary beneficiary of the investee’s activities and is accounted for using the equity method. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows to conform with current year presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on previously reported total assets, total liabilities, partners' capital, net income (loss) or cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities.
Use of Estimates
Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The most significant estimates pertain to coal and aggregates reserves and related cash flow estimates which are used to compute depreciation, depletion and amortization and impairments of coal and aggregates properties and related intangible assets and commitments and contingencies.
Fair Value
The
Partnership discloses certain assets and liabilities using fair value as defined by authoritative guidance. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. See Note 13. Fair Value Measurements for further details.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
There
are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
| |
• | Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
| |
• | Level 2—Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. |
| |
• | Level 3—Unobservable
inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial assets and liabilities whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. |
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
The Partnership considers all highly liquid short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Restricted cash at December 31, 2018 included cash proceeds received from the sale of the Partnership's construction aggregates business that the Partnership used to repay debt in 2019. Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
The Partnership records an allowance for doubtful accounts for its accounts receivables and notes receivables which it determines to be uncollectible based on the specific identification method. Receivables are written off when collection efforts are exhausted and future recovery is doubtful. The allowance for doubtful accounts receivable is included in accounts receivable, net and the allowance for doubtful accounts for notes receivable is included in prepaid expenses and other, net on the Partnership's Consolidated Balance Sheets, respectively. The allowance for doubtful accounts related to accounts receivables was $0.4 million at December 31, 2019. The allowance for doubtful accounts related to notes receivables
was $1.2 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018. The Partnership recorded bad debt expense of $7.5 million, $(0.1) million and $2.4 million included in operating and maintenance expenses on its Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Mineral Rights
Mineral
rights owned and leased are recorded at its original cost of construction or, upon acquisition, at fair value of the assets acquired. Coal and aggregates mineral rights are depleted on a unit-of-production basis by lease, based upon minerals mined in relation to the net cost of the mineral properties and estimated proven and probable tonnage therein.
Intangible Assets
The Partnership’s intangible assets consist of mineral royalty and transportation contracts that at acquisition were more favorable for the Partnership than prevailing market rates, known as above-market contracts. The estimated fair value
of the above-market rate contracts are determined based on the present value of future cash flow projections related to the underlying assets acquired. Intangible assets are amortized on a unit-of-production basis by asset based upon minerals mined or transported in relation to the net book value of the intangible asset and estimated proven and probable tonnage expected to be mined or transported during the above-market contract term.
Asset Impairment
The Partnership has developed procedures to evaluate its long-lived assets for possible impairment periodically or whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate an asset's net book value may not be recoverable. Potential events or circumstances include, but are not limited to, specific events such as a reduction in economically recoverable reserves or production ceasing on a property for an extended period. This analysis is based on historic, current and future performance and considers both quantitative and qualitative information. A long-lived asset is deemed impaired when the future expected undiscounted cash flows from its use and disposition is less than the asset's net book value. Impairment is measured based on the estimated fair value, which is usually determined based upon the present value of the projected future cash flows compared to the asset's net book value. The Partnership believes its estimates of cash flows and discount rates are consistent with those of principal market participants.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
The Partnership evaluates its equity investment for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate, in management’s judgment, that the carrying value of such investment may have experienced an other-than-temporary decline in value. When evidence of loss in value has occurred, management compares the estimated fair value of the investment to the carrying value of the investment to determine whether potential impairment has occurred. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying value and management considers the decline in value to be other than temporary, the excess of the carrying value over the estimated
fair value is recognized in the financial statements as an impairment loss. The fair value of the impaired investment is based on quoted market prices (Level 1), or upon the present value of expected cash flows using discount rates believed to be consistent with those used by principal market participants (Level 3), plus market analysis of comparable assets owned by the investee, if appropriate (Level 3).
Accrued Liabilities
Included in accrued liabilities on the Partnership's Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2019 were $3.7 million of accrued employee costs and $5.0 million of other accrued liabilities, which includes property and franchise
taxes and disputed well liabilities.
Revenue Recognition
Coal Royalty and Other Segment Revenues
Royalty-based leases. Approximately two-thirds of the Partnership's royalty-based leases have initial terms of five to 40 years, with substantially all lessees having the option to extend the lease for additional terms. For these types of leases, the lessees generally make payments to NRP based on the greater of a percentage of the gross sales price or a fixed price per ton of mineral mined and sold. Most of NRP’s coal and aggregates royalty leases require the lessee to pay quarterly
or annual minimum amounts, either made in advance or arrears, which are generally recoupable through actual royalty production over certain time periods that generally range from three to five years.
In accordance with previous accounting standards in effect prior to January 1, 2018, the Partnership recognized all coal and aggregates royalty revenues over the lease term based on production. The recognition of revenue from minimum payments was deferred until either recoupment through royalty production occurred or when the recoupment period expired for unrecouped minimums. In accordance with the accounting standard in effect subsequent to January 1, 2018 ("ASC 606"), management has defined NRP's coal and aggregates royalty lease
performance obligation as providing the lessee the right to mine and sell NRP's coal or aggregates over the lease term. The Partnership then evaluated the likelihood that consideration NRP expected to receive from its lessees resulting from production would exceed consideration expected to be received from minimum payments over the lease term. As a result of this evaluation, revenue recognition from the Partnership's royalty-based leases is based on either production or minimum payments as follows:
| |
• | Production Leases: Leases for which the Partnership expects that consideration from production will be greater than consideration from minimums over the lease term. Revenue recognition for these
leases is recognized over time based on production as coal royalty revenues or aggregates royalty revenues, as applicable. Deferred revenue from minimums is recognized as royalty revenues when recoupment occurs or as production lease minimum revenues when the recoupment period expires. In addition, NRP recognizes breakage revenue from minimums when NRP determines that recoupment is remote. This breakage revenue is included in production lease minimum revenues. |
| |
• | Minimum Leases: Leases for which the Partnership expects that consideration from minimums will be greater than consideration from production over the lease term. Revenue recognition for these leases is recognized straight-line over the lease term based on the
minimum consideration amount as minimum lease straight-line revenues. |
This evaluation is performed at the inception of the lease and only reassessed upon modification or renewal of the lease.
Oil and gas related revenues consist of revenues from royalties and overriding royalties and are recognized on the basis of volume of hydrocarbons sold by lessees and the corresponding revenues from those sales. Also, included within oil and gas royalty revenues are lease bonus payments, which are generally paid upon the execution of a lease. The Partnership also has overriding royalty revenue interests in coal reserves. Revenues from these interests are recognized over time based on when the coal is sold.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
Wheelage revenues. Revenues related to fees collected per ton to transport foreign coal across property owned by the Partnership that is recognized over time as transportation across the property occurs.
Other revenues. Other revenues consists primarily of rental payments and surface damage fees related to certain land owned by the Partnership and is recognized straight-line over time as it is earned. Other revenues also include property tax revenues. The majority of property taxes paid on the Partnership's properties are reimbursable
by the lessee and are recognized on a gross basis over time which reflects the reimbursement of property taxes by the lessee. Property taxes paid by NRP are included in operating and maintenance expenses on the Partnership's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Transportation and processing services revenues. The Partnership owns transportation and processing infrastructure that is leased to third parties for throughput fees. Revenue is recognized over time based on the coal tons transported over the beltlines or processed through the facilities.
Contract
modifications that impact goods or services or the transaction price are evaluated in accordance with ASC 606. A majority of the Partnership's contract modifications pertain to its coal and aggregates royalty contracts and include, but are not limited to, extending the lease term, changes to royalty rates, floor prices or minimum consideration, assignment of the contract or forfeiture of recoupment rights. Consideration received in conjunction with a modification of an ongoing lease will be deferred and recognized straight-line over the remaining term of the contract. Consideration received to assign a lease
to another party and related forfeited minimums will be recognized immediately upon the termination of the contract. Fees from contract modifications are recognized in lease amendment revenues within coal royalty and other revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) while modifications in royalty rates and minimums will be recognized prospectively in accordance with the above lease classification. Contract
assets include receivables from contracts with customers and are recorded when the right to consideration becomes unconditional. Receivables are recognized when the minimums are contractually owed, production occurs or minimums accrued for based on the passage of time. Contract liabilities represent minimum consideration received, contractually owed or earned based on the passage of time. The current portion of deferred revenue relates to deferred revenue on minimum leases and lease amendment fees that are to be recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the next twelve months. The long-term portion of deferred revenue relates to deferred revenue on production leases and lease amendment fees that are to be recognized as revenue on a straight-line
basis beyond the next twelve months. Due to uncertainty in the amount of deferred revenue that will be recouped and recognized as coal royalty revenues from its production leases over the next twelve months, the Partnership is unable to estimate the current portion of deferred revenue. Equity in Earnings of Ciner Wyoming
The Partnership accounts for non-marketable equity investments using the equity method of accounting if the investment gives it the ability to exercise significant influence over, but not control of, an investee. The Partnership's 49% investment in Ciner Wyoming is accounted for using this method. Under the equity method of accounting, investments are stated at initial cost and are adjusted for subsequent additional investments and the proportionate share of earnings
or losses and distributions. The basis difference between the investment and the proportional share of investee's net assets is attributed to net tangible assets and is amortized over its estimated useful life. The carrying value in Ciner Wyoming is recognized in equity in unconsolidated investment on the Partnership's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Partnership's adjusted share of the earnings or losses of Ciner Wyoming and amortization of the basis difference is recognized in equity in earnings of Ciner Wyoming on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). The Partnership decreases its investment for its proportional share of distributions received from Ciner Wyoming. These cash flows are reported utilizing the cumulative earnings approach. Under this approach, distributions received are considered returns on investment and classified as operating cash inflows unless the cumulative distributions received exceed the Partnership's cumulative equity
in earnings. The excess of cumulative distributions received over the Partnership's cumulative equity in earnings are considered returns of investment and classified as investing cash inflows.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
Property Taxes
The Partnership is responsible for paying property taxes on the properties it owns. Typically,
the lessees are contractually responsible for reimbursing the Partnership for property taxes on the leased properties. The payment of and reimbursement of property taxes is included in operating and maintenance expenses and in coal royalty and other revenues, respectively, on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Transportation Revenues and Expenses
The Partnership records transportation and processing revenues and pays transportation and processing costs to an affiliate of Foresight Energy LP to operate equipment on behalf of the Partnership. The revenues and expenses related to these transactions are recorded as transportation and processing services revenues and operating and maintenance expenses, respectively, on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). See Note
14. Related Party Transactions for more information.
Unit-Based Compensation
The Partnership has awarded unit-based compensation in the form of equity-based awards and phantom units. Compensation cost is measured at the grant date for equity-classified awards and remeasured each reporting period for liability-classified awards based on the fair value of an award and is recognized over the service period, which is generally the vesting period. Forfeitures are recognized as they occur. Unit-based compensation expense for all awards is recognized in general and administrative expenses and operating and maintenance expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). See Note
17. Unit-Based Compensation for more information.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs consist of legal and other costs related to the issuance of the Partnership’s debt. These costs are amortized over the term of the respective line-of-credit or debt arrangements. Deferred financing costs related to the Partnership's revolving credit facility are included in other assets, net on the Partnership's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Deferred financing costs related to the Partnership's note agreements are included as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability in current portion of long-term debt, net or long-term debt, net on the Partnership's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Income
Taxes
The Partnership is not subject to federal or material state income taxes as the unitholders are taxed individually on their allocable share of taxable income. Net income (loss) for financial statement purposes may differ significantly from taxable income reportable to unitholders as a result of differences between the tax basis and financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities. In the event of an examination of the Partnership’s tax return, the tax liability of the unitholders could be changed if an adjustment in the Partnership’s income is ultimately sustained by the taxing authorities.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
Leases
On January
1, 2019, NRP adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 842, Leases, and all the related amendments (the “new lease standard” and "ASC 842") and recognized assets and liabilities on its Consolidated Balance Sheet for the present value of the rights and obligations created by all leases with terms of more than 12 months. This standard does not apply to leases that explore for or use minerals, oil, natural gas and similar non-regenerative resources, including the intangible right to explore for those natural resources and rights to use the land in which those natural resources are contained. The guidance also required disclosures designed to give financial statement users information on the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The guidance was adopted by NRP on January 1, 2019 using a modified retrospective approach. The
Partnership is a lessee in one lease that is accounted for as an operating lease under the new lease standard, and the adoption of the new lease standard did not have a material impact to the Partnership's Consolidated Financial Statements. For lease agreements entered into or reassessed after the adoption of ASC 842, the Partnership elected to not combine lease and non-lease components. See Note 19. Leases for more information.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
Credit Losses
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326). The new standard changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. The new standard replaces today's "incurred loss" model with an "expected credit loss" model that requires entities to estimate an expected lifetime credit loss on financial assets, including trade accounts receivable. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and is to be adopted using a modified retrospective approach. As a result of implementation of the new standard the Partnership expects to record an approximate
$5 million reduction of its financial assets and a corresponding decrease in Partners' Capital on January 1, 2020. NRP does not expect this standard to have a material effect on its Consolidated Financial Statements subsequent to adoption. The following table represents the Partnership's Coal Royalty and Other segment revenues by major source:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year
Ended December 31, |
(In thousands) | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Coal royalty revenues | | $ | 109,612 |
| | $ | 129,341 |
|
Production
lease minimum revenues | | 24,068 |
| | 8,207 |
|
Minimum lease straight-line revenues | | 14,910 |
| | 2,362 |
|
Property
tax revenues | | 6,287 |
| | 5,422 |
|
Wheelage revenues | | 5,880 |
| | 6,484 |
|
Coal
overriding royalty revenues | | 13,496 |
| | 13,878 |
|
Lease amendment revenues | | 7,991 |
| | — |
|
Aggregates
royalty revenues | | 4,265 |
| | 4,739 |
|
Oil and gas royalty revenues | | 3,031 |
| | 6,608 |
|
Other
revenues | | 1,529 |
| | 1,837 |
|
Coal royalty and other revenues (1) | | $ | 191,069 |
| | $ | 178,878 |
|
Transportation
and processing services revenues (2) | | 19,279 |
| | 23,887 |
|
Total Coal royalty and Other segment revenues | | $ | 210,348 |
| | $ | 202,765 |
|
| |
(1) | Coal
royalty and other revenues from contracts with customers as defined under ASC 606. |
| |
(2) | Transportation and processing services revenues from contracts with customers as defined under ASC 606 was $9.6 million and $13.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
The remaining transportation and processing services revenues of $9.7 million and $10.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, related to other NRP-owned infrastructure leased to and operated by third-party operators accounted for under other guidance. See Note 18. Financing Transaction and Note 19. Leases for more information. |
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
The following table details the Partnership's Coal Royalty and Other segment receivables and liabilities resulting from contracts with customers: |
| | | | | | | | |
| | December
31, |
(In thousands) | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Receivables | | | | |
Accounts receivable, net | | $ | 27,915 |
| | $ | 29,001 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other (1) | | 90 |
| | 2,483 |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
Current portion of deferred revenue | | $ | 4,608 |
| | $ | 3,509 |
|
Deferred
revenue | | 47,213 |
| | 49,044 |
|
| |
(1) | Prepaid
expenses and other includes notes receivable from contracts with customers. |
The following table shows the activity related to the Partnership's Coal Royalty and Other segment deferred revenue:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
(In thousands) | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Balance
at end of prior period (current and non-current) | | $ | 52,553 |
| | $ | 100,605 |
|
Cumulative adjustment for change in accounting principle | | — |
| | (65,591 | ) |
Balance
at beginning of period (current and non-current) | | $ | 52,553 |
| | $ | 35,014 |
|
Increase due to minimums and lease amendment fees | | 47,038 |
| | 37,781 |
|
Recognition
of previously deferred revenue | | (47,770 | ) | | (20,242 | ) |
Balance at end of period (current and non-current) | | $ | 51,821 |
| | $ | 52,553 |
|
The
Partnership's non-cancelable annual minimum payments due under the lease terms of its coal and aggregates royalty and overriding royalty leases are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | |
Lease Term (1) | | | | Annual Minimum Payments (2) |
0
- 5 years | | 2.3 | | $ | 13,812 |
|
5 - 10 years | | 6.2 | | 9,718 |
|
10+ years | | 11.9 | | 44,757 |
|
Total | | 9.1 | | $ | 68,287 |
|
| |
(1) | Lease
term does not include renewal periods. |
| |
(2) | Annual minimum payments do not include $5.0 million from a coal infrastructure lease that is accounted for as a financing transaction. See Note 18. Financing Transaction for additional information. |
4. Discontinued Operations
In December 2018, the Partnership sold VantaCore Partners LLC, its
construction aggregates materials business for $205 million, before customary purchase price adjustments and transaction expenses, and recorded a gain of $13.1 million, and in July 2016, the Partnership sold its non-operated oil and gas working interest assets. The Partnership's exit from both its construction aggregates business and non-operated oil and gas working interest business represented strategic shifts to reduce debt and focus on its Coal Royalty and Other and Soda Ash business segments. As a result, the Partnership classified the assets and liabilities, operating results and cash flows of these businesses as discontinued operations on its Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for all periods presented.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
The following table presents the carrying amounts of the Partnership's assets and liabilities of discontinued operations on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| 2019 | | 2018 |
(In thousands) | Construction Aggregates | | NRP
Oil and Gas | | Total | | Construction Aggregates | | NRP
Oil and Gas | | Total |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current
assets | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable, net | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,706 |
| | $ | 1,706 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 988 |
| | $ | 993 |
|
Total
assets of discontinued operations | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,706 |
| | $ | 1,706 |
|
| $ | 5 |
|
| $ | 988 |
|
| $ | 993 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current
liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | $ | 42 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 42 |
| | $ | 181 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 181 |
|
Accrued
liabilities | 23 |
| | — |
| | 23 |
| | 766 |
| | — |
| | 766 |
|
Total
liabilities of discontinued operations | $ | 65 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 65 |
| | $ | 947 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 947 |
|
The
following tables present summarized financial results of the Partnership's discontinued operations on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
(In thousands) | Construction Aggregates | | NRP
Oil and Gas | | Total |
Revenues and other income | | | | | |
Oil and gas | $ | — |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 2 |
|
Gain
on asset sales and disposals | 280 |
| | — |
| | 280 |
|
Total revenues and other income | $ | 280 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 282 |
|
| | | | |
|
Operating
expenses | | | | |
|
Operating and maintenance expenses | $ | 27 |
| | $ | 16 |
| | $ | 43 |
|
Total
operating expenses | $ | 27 |
| | $ | 16 |
| | $ | 43 |
|
| | | | | |
Other
income | $ | — |
| | $ | 717 |
| | $ | 717 |
|
Income from discontinued operations | $ | 253 |
| | $ | 703 |
| | $ | 956 |
|
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
(In thousands) | Construction
Aggregates | | NRP Oil and Gas | | Total |
Revenues and other income | | | | | |
Construction aggregates | $ | 116,066 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 116,066 |
|
Road
construction and asphalt paving services | 18,400 |
| | — |
| | 18,400 |
|
Oil and gas | — |
| | (3 | ) | | (3 | ) |
Gain
on asset sales and disposals | 13,414 |
| | — |
| | 13,414 |
|
Total revenues and other income | $ | 147,880 |
| | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | 147,877 |
|
| | | | | |
Operating
expenses | | | | | |
Operating and maintenance expenses | $ | 117,568 |
| | $ | 134 |
| | $ | 117,702 |
|
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization | 12,218 |
| | — |
| | 12,218 |
|
Asset impairments | 232 |
| | — |
| | 232 |
|
Total
operating expenses | $ | 130,018 |
| | $ | 134 |
| | $ | 130,152 |
|
| | | | | |
Interest
expense | $ | (38 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (38 | ) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | 17,824 |
| | $ | (137 | ) | | $ | 17,687 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
(In thousands) | Construction Aggregates | | NRP Oil and Gas | | Total |
Revenues and other income | | | | | |
Construction
aggregates | $ | 112,970 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 112,970 |
|
Road construction and asphalt paving services | 18,411 |
| | — |
| | 18,411 |
|
Oil
and gas | — |
| | 38 |
| | 38 |
|
Gain (loss) on asset sales and disposals | 311 |
| | (289 | ) | | 22 |
|
Total
revenues and other income | $ | 131,692 |
| | $ | (251 | ) | | $ | 131,441 |
|
| | | | | |
Operating
expenses | | | | | |
Operating and maintenance expenses | $ | 111,633 |
| | $ | 290 |
| | $ | 111,923 |
|
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization | 12,579 |
| | — |
| | 12,579 |
|
Asset impairments | 64 |
| | — |
| | 64 |
|
Total
operating expenses | $ | 124,276 |
| | $ | 290 |
| | $ | 124,566 |
|
| | | | | |
Interest
expense | $ | (693 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (693 | ) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | 6,723 |
| | $ | (541 | ) | | $ | 6,182 |
|
Capital
expenditures related to the Partnership's discontinued operations were $10.9 million and $7.6 million during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, of which $0.9 million and $0.3 million were funded with accounts payable or accrued liabilities during 2018 and 2017, respectively.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
5. Class A Convertible Preferred Units and Warrants
On March 2, 2017, NRP issued $250 million of Class A Convertible Preferred Units representing limited partner interests in NRP (the "preferred units") to certain entities controlled by funds affiliated with The Blackstone Group Inc. (collectively referred to as "Blackstone") and certain affiliates of GoldenTree Asset Management LP (collectively referred to as "GoldenTree")
(together the "preferred purchasers") pursuant to a Preferred Unit and Warrant Purchase Agreement. NRP issued 250,000 preferred units to the preferred purchasers at a price of $1,000 per preferred unit (the "per unit purchase price"), less a 2.5% structuring and origination fee. The preferred units entitle the preferred purchasers to receive cumulative distributions at a rate of 12% of the purchase price per year, up to one half of which NRP may pay in additional preferred units (such additional preferred units, the "PIK units"). The preferred units have a perpetual term, unless converted or redeemed as described below.
NRP also issued two tranches of warrants (the "warrants")
to purchase common units to the preferred purchasers (warrants to purchase 1.75 million common units with a strike price of $22.81 and warrants to purchase 2.25 million common units with a strike price of $34.00). The warrants may be exercised by the holders thereof at any time before the eighth anniversary of the closing date. Upon exercise of the warrants, NRP may, at its option, elect to settle the warrants in common units or cash, each on a net basis.
After March 2, 2022 and prior to March 2, 2025, the holders of the preferred units may elect to convert up to 33%
of the outstanding preferred units in any 12-month period into common units if the volume weighted average trading price of our common units (the "VWAP") for the 30 trading days immediately prior to date notice is provided is greater than $51.00. In such case, the number of common units to be issued upon conversion would be equal to the per unit purchase price plus the value of any accrued and unpaid distributions divided by an amount equal to a 7.5% discount to the VWAP for the 30 trading days immediately prior to the notice of conversion. Rather than have the preferred units convert to common units in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph, NRP would have the option to elect to redeem the preferred units proposed to be converted for cash at a price equal to the per unit purchase price plus the value of any accrued and unpaid distributions.
On
or after March 2, 2025, the holders of the preferred units may elect to convert the preferred units to common units at a conversion rate equal to the Liquidation Value divided by an amount equal to a 10% discount to the VWAP for the 30 trading days immediately prior to the notice of conversion. The “liquidation value” will be an amount equal to the greater of: (1) (a) the per unit purchase price multiplied by (i) prior to March 2, 2020, 1.50, (ii) on or after March 2, 2020 and prior to March 2, 2021, 1.70 and (iii) on or after March 2, 2021, 1.85,
less (b)(i) all preferred unit distributions previously made by NRP and (ii) all cash payments previously made in respect of redemption of any PIK units; and (2) the per unit purchase price plus the value of all accrued and unpaid distributions.
To the extent the holders of the preferred units have not elected to convert their preferred units before March 2, 2029, NRP has the right to force conversion of the preferred units at a price equal to the liquidation value divided by an amount equal to a 10% discount to the VWAP for the 30 trading days immediately prior to the notice of conversion.
In addition, NRP has the ability to redeem at any time (subject to compliance with its debt agreements)
all or any portion of the preferred units and any outstanding PIK units for cash. The redemption price for each outstanding PIK unit is $1,000 plus the value of any accrued and unpaid distributions per PIK unit. The redemption price for each preferred unit is the liquidation value divided by the number of outstanding preferred units. The preferred units are redeemable at the option of the preferred purchasers only upon a change in control.
The terms of the preferred units contain certain restrictions on NRP's ability to pay distributions on its common units. To the extent that either (i) NRP's consolidated Leverage Ratio, as defined in the Partnership's Fifth Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement dated March 2, 2017 (the "restated partnership agreement"), is greater than
3.25x, or (ii) the ratio of NRP's Distributable Cash Flow (as defined in the Restated Partnership Agreement) to cash distributions made or proposed to be made is less than 1.2x (in each case, with respect to the most recently completed four-quarter period), NRP may not increase the quarterly distribution above $0.45 per quarter without the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding preferred units. In addition, if at any time after January 1, 2022, any PIK units are outstanding, NRP may not make distributions on its common units until it has redeemed all PIK units for cash.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
The holders of the preferred units have the right to vote with holders of NRP’s common units on an as-converted basis and have other customary approval rights with respect to changes of the terms of the preferred units. In addition, Blackstone has certain approval rights over certain matters as identified in the restated partnership agreement. GoldenTree also has more limited approval rights that will expand once Blackstone's ownership goes below the minimum preferred unit threshold (as defined below). These approval rights are not transferrable without NRP's consent. In addition, the approval rights held by Blackstone and GoldenTree
will terminate at such time that Blackstone (together with their affiliates) or GoldenTree (together with their affiliates), as applicable, no longer own at least 20% of the total number of preferred units issued on the closing date, together with all PIK units that have been issued but not redeemed (the "minimum preferred unit threshold").
At the closing, pursuant to the Board Representation and Observation Rights Agreement, the Preferred Purchasers received certain board appointment and observation rights, and Blackstone appointed one director and one observer to the Board of Directors.
NRP also entered into a registration rights
agreement (the "preferred unit and warrant registration rights agreement") with the preferred purchasers, pursuant to which NRP is required to file (i) a shelf registration statement to register the common units issuable upon exercise of the warrants and to cause such registration statement to become effective not later than 90 days following the closing date and (ii) a shelf registration statement to register the common units issuable upon conversion of the preferred units and to cause such registration statement to become effective not later than the earlier of the fifth anniversary of the closing date or 90 days following the first issuance of any common units upon conversion of preferred units (the "registration deadlines"). In addition, the preferred unit and warrant registration rights
agreement gives the preferred purchasers piggyback registration and demand underwritten offering rights under certain circumstances. The shelf registration statement to register the common units issuable upon exercise of the warrants became effective on April 20, 2017. If the shelf registration statement to register the common units issuable upon conversion of the preferred units is not effective by the applicable registration deadline, NRP will be required to pay the preferred purchasers liquidated damages in the amounts and upon the term set forth in the preferred unit and warrant registration rights agreement.
Accounting for the Preferred Units and Warrants
Classification
The
preferred units are accounted for as temporary equity on NRP's Consolidated Balance Sheets due to certain contingent redemption rights that may be exercised at the election of preferred purchasers. The warrants are accounted for as equity on NRP's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Initial Measurement
The net transaction price as shown below was allocated to the preferred units and warrants based on their relative fair values at inception date. NRP allocated the transaction issuance costs to the preferred units and warrants primarily on a pro-rata basis based on their relative inception date allocated values.
The preferred units and warrants were initially recognized as follows:
|
| | | | |
(In
thousands) | | |
Transaction price, gross | | $ | 250,000 |
|
Structuring, origination and other fees to preferred purchasers | | (7,900 | ) |
Transaction
costs to other third parties | | (10,697 | ) |
Transaction price, net | | $ | 231,403 |
|
Allocation of net transaction price | | |
Preferred units, net | | $ | 164,587 |
|
Warrant
holders interest, net | | 66,816 |
|
Transaction price, net | | $ | 231,403 |
|
NATURAL
RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
Subsequent Measurement
Subsequent adjustment of the preferred units will not occur until NRP has determined that the conversion or redemption of all or a portion of the preferred units is probable of occurring. Once conversion or redemption becomes probable of occurring, the carrying amount of the preferred units will be accreted to their redemption value over the period from the date the feature is probable of occurring to the date the preferred units can first be converted or redeemed.
Activity related to
the preferred units is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
(In thousands, except unit data) | | Units Outstanding | | Financial Position |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Issuance
of preferred units, net | | 250,000 |
| | 164,587 |
|
Distribution paid-in-kind | | 8,844 |
| | 8,844 |
|
| | 258,844 |
| | $ | 173,431 |
|
Redemption of PIK units | | (8,844 | ) | | (8,844 | ) |
| | 250,000 |
| | $ | 164,587 |
|
Subsequent adjustment of the warrants will not occur until the warrants are exercised, at which time, NRP may, at its option, elect to settle the warrants in common units or cash, each on a net basis. The net basis will be equal to the difference between
the Partnership's common unit price and the strike price of the warrant. Once warrant exercise occurs, the difference between the carrying amount of the warrants and the net settlement amount will be allocated on a pro-rata basis to the common unitholders and general partner.
Certain embedded features within the preferred unit and warrant purchase agreement are accounted for at fair value and are remeasured each quarter. See Note 13. Fair Value Measurements for further information regarding valuation of these embedded derivatives.
6. Common and Preferred Unit Distributions
The
Partnership makes cash distributions to common and preferred unitholders on a quarterly basis, subject to approval by the Board of Directors. NRP recognizes both common unit and preferred unit distributions on the date the distribution is declared.
Distributions made on the common units and the general partner's general partner ("GP") interest are made on a pro-rata basis in accordance with their relative percentage interests in the Partnership. The general partner is entitled to receive 2% of such distributions.
Income (loss) available to common unitholders and the general partner is reduced by preferred unit distributions that accumulated during the period. NRP reduced net income (loss) available to common unitholders and the general partner by $30.0 million
during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 and $25.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 as a result of accumulated preferred unit distributions earned during the period. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Partnership redeemed all of the outstanding PIK units, which resulted in an $8.8 million cash payment during the period. This $8.8 million cash payment is not included in the table below.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
The following table shows the distributions declared and paid to common and preferred unitholders during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common
Units | | Preferred Units |
Date Paid | | Period Covered by Distribution | | Distribution per Unit | | Total Distribution (1) (In thousands) | | Distribution
per Unit | | Total Distribution (In thousands) |
2019 | | | | | | | | | | |
February
2019 | | | | $ | 0.45 |
| | $ | 5,625 |
| | $ | 30.00 |
| | $ | 7,500 |
|
May
2019 | | | | 0.45 |
| | 5,630 |
| | 30.00 |
| | 7,500 |
|
May
2019 (2) | | Special Distribution | | 0.85 |
| | 10,635 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
August
2019 | | | | 0.45 |
| | 5,630 |
| | 30.00 |
| | 7,500 |
|
November
2019 | | | | 0.45 |
| | 5,630 |
| | 30.00 |
| | 7,500 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
2018 | | | | | | | | | | |
February
2018 | | | | $ | 0.45 |
| | $ | 5,617 |
| | $ | 30.00 |
| | $ | 7,765 |
|
May
2018 | | | | 0.45 |
| | 5,623 |
| | 30.00 |
| | 7,500 |
|
August
2018 | | | | 0.45 |
| | 5,623 |
| | 30.00 |
| | 7,500 |
|
November
2018 | | | | 0.45 |
| | 5,623 |
| | 30.00 |
| | 7,500 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
2017 | | | | | | | | | | |
February
2017 | | | | $ | 0.45 |
| | $ | 5,615 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
May
2017 | | | | 0.45 |
| | 5,619 |
| | 5.00 |
| | 2,500 |
|
August
2017 | | | | 0.45 |
| | 5,616 |
| | 15.00 |
| | 7,538 |
|
November
2017 | | | | 0.45 |
| | 5,617 |
| | 15.00 |
| | 7,650 |
|
| |
(1) | Totals
include the amount paid to NRP's general partner in accordance with the general partner's 2% general partner interest. |
| |
(2) | The special distribution of $0.85 per common unit was made to cover the common unitholders’ tax liability resulting from the sale of NRP’s construction aggregates business in December 2018. |
7. Net Income (Loss) Per Common Unit
Basic net income (loss) per common unit is computed by dividing net income (loss),
after considering income attributable to non-controlling interest, preferred unitholders and the general partner’s general partner interest, by the weighted average number of common units outstanding. Diluted net income (loss) per common unit includes the effect of NRP's preferred units, warrants, and unvested unit-based awards if the inclusion of these items is dilutive.
The dilutive effect of the preferred units is calculated using the if-converted method. Under the if-converted method, the preferred units are assumed to be converted at the beginning of the period, and the resulting common units are included in the denominator of the diluted net income (loss) per unit calculation for the period being presented. Distributions declared in the period and undeclared distributions on the preferred units that accumulated during the period are added back to the numerator for purposes of the if-converted calculation. The calculation
of diluted net loss per common unit for the year ended December 31, 2019 did not include the assumed conversion of the preferred units because the impact would have been anti-dilutive. The calculation of diluted net income (loss) per common unit for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 included the assumed conversion of the preferred units. The dilutive effect of the warrants is calculated using the treasury stock method, which assumes that the proceeds from the exercise of these instruments are used to purchase common units at the average market price for the period. Due to NRP's net loss during the year ended December 31, 2019, the dilutive effect of the warrants were not included as the impact would have been anti-dilutive.
The calculation of the dilutive effect of the warrants for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 included the net settlement of warrants to purchase 1.75 million common units with a strike price of $22.81 but did not include the net settlement of warrants to purchase 2.25 million common units with a strike price of $34.00 because the impact would have been anti-dilutive.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS
L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
The following tables reconcile the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted net income (loss) per common unit computations and calculates basic and diluted net income (loss) per common unit:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year
Ended December 31, |
(In thousands, except per unit data) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Allocation of net income (loss) | | | | | | |
Net
income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | (25,414 | ) | | $ | 122,360 |
| | $ | 82,485 |
|
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interest | | — |
| | (510 | ) | | — |
|
Less:
income attributable to preferred unitholders | | (30,000 | ) | | (30,000 | ) | | (25,453 | ) |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders and general partner | | $ | (55,414 | ) | | $ | 91,850 |
| | $ | 57,032 |
|
Add
(less): net loss (income) from continuing operations attributable to the general partner | | 1,108 |
| | (1,837 | ) | | (1,141 | ) |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders | | $ | (54,306 | ) | | $ | 90,013 |
| | $ | 55,891 |
|
| | | | | | |
Net
income from discontinued operations | | $ | 956 |
| | $ | 17,687 |
| | $ | 6,182 |
|
Less: net income from discontinued operations attributable to the general
partner | | (19 | ) | | (354 | ) | | (123 | ) |
Net income from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders | | $ | 937 |
| | $ | 17,333 |
| | $ | 6,059 |
|
| | | | | | |
Net
income (loss) | | $ | (24,458 | ) | | $ | 140,047 |
| | $ | 88,667 |
|
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interest | | — |
| | (510 | ) | | — |
|
Less:
income attributable to preferred unitholders | | (30,000 | ) | | (30,000 | ) | | (25,453 | ) |
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders and general partner | | $ | (54,458 | ) | | $ | 109,537 |
| | $ | 63,214 |
|
Add
(less): net loss (income) attributable to the general partner | | 1,089 |
| | (2,191 | ) | | (1,264 | ) |
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders | | $ | (53,369 | ) | | $ | 107,346 |
| | $ | 61,950 |
|
| | | | | | |
Basic
income (loss) per common unit | | | | | | |
Weighted average common units—basic | | 12,260 |
| | 12,244 |
| | 12,232 |
|
Basic
net income (loss) from continuing operations per common unit | | $ | (4.43 | ) | | $ | 7.35 |
| | $ | 4.57 |
|
Basic net income from discontinued operations per
common unit | | $ | 0.08 |
| | $ | 1.42 |
| | $ | 0.50 |
|
Basic net income (loss) per common unit | | $ | (4.35 | ) | | $ | 8.77 |
| | $ | 5.06 |
|
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
(In
thousands, except per unit data) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Diluted income (loss) per common unit | | | | | | |
Weighted
average common units—basic | | 12,260 |
| | 12,244 |
| | 12,232 |
|
Plus: dilutive effect of preferred units | | — |
| | 7,479 |
| | 9,418 |
|
Plus:
dilutive effect of warrants | | — |
| | 511 |
| | 300 |
|
Plus: dilutive effect of unvested unit-based awards | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Weighted
average common units—diluted | | 12,260 |
| | 20,234 |
| | 21,950 |
|
| | | | | | |
Net
income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | (25,414 | ) | | $ | 122,360 |
| | $ | 82,485 |
|
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interest | | — |
| | (510 | ) | | — |
|
Less:
net income attributable to preferred unitholders | | (30,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Diluted net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders and general partner | | $ | (55,414 | ) | | $ | 121,850 |
| | $ | 82,485 |
|
Add
(less): net loss (income) from continuing operations attributable to the general partner | | 1,108 |
| | (2,437 | ) | | (1,650 | ) |
Diluted net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders | | $ | (54,306 | ) | | $ | 119,413 |
| | $ | 80,835 |
|
| | | | | | |
Diluted
net income from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders | | $ | 937 |
| | $ | 17,333 |
| | $ | 6,059 |
|
| | | | | | |
Net
income (loss) | | $ | (24,458 | ) | | $ | 140,047 |
| | $ | 88,667 |
|
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interest | | — |
| | (510 | ) | | — |
|
Less:
net income attributable to preferred unitholders | | (30,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Diluted net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders and general partner | | $ | (54,458 | ) | | $ | 139,537 |
| | $ | 88,667 |
|
Add
(less): diluted net loss (income) attributable to the general partner | | 1,089 |
| | (2,791 | ) | | (1,773 | ) |
Diluted net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders | | $ | (53,369 | ) | | $ | 136,746 |
| | $ | 86,894 |
|
| | | | | | |
Diluted
net income (loss) from continuing operations per common unit | | $ | (4.43 | ) | | $ | 5.90 |
| | $ | 3.68 |
|
Diluted net income from discontinued operations per
common unit | | $ | 0.08 |
| | $ | 0.86 |
| | $ | 0.28 |
|
Diluted net income (loss) per common unit | | $ | (4.35 | ) | | $ | 6.76 |
| | $ | 3.96 |
|
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
8. Segment Information
The Partnership's segments are strategic business units that offer distinct products and services to different customers in different geographies within the U.S. and that are managed accordingly. NRP has the following two operating segments:
Coal Royalty and Other—consists primarily of coal royalty properties and coal-related transportation and processing
assets. Other assets include industrial mineral royalty properties, aggregates royalty properties, oil and gas royalty properties and timber. The Partnership's coal reserves are primarily located in Appalachia, the Illinois Basin and the Northern Powder River Basin in the United States. The Partnership's industrial minerals and aggregates properties are located in various states across the United States. The Partnership's oil and gas royalty assets are primarily located in Louisiana and its timber assets are primarily located in West Virginia.
Soda Ash—consists of the Partnership's 49% non-controlling equity interest in Ciner Wyoming, a trona ore mining operation and soda ash refinery in the Green River Basin of Wyoming. Ciner Resources LP, the Partnership's operating partner, mines the trona, processes it into soda ash, and distributes the soda ash both domestically
and internationally to the glass and chemicals industries.
Direct segment costs and certain other costs incurred at the corporate level that are identifiable and that benefit the Partnership's segments are allocated to the operating segments accordingly. These allocated costs generally include salaries and benefits, insurance, property taxes, legal, royalty, information technology and shared facilities services and are included in operating and maintenance expenses on the Partnership's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Corporate and Financing includes functional corporate departments that do not earn revenues. Costs incurred by these departments include interest and financing, corporate headquarters and overhead, centralized treasury, legal and accounting and other corporate-level activity not specifically allocated to a segment and are included in general and
administrative expenses on the Partnership's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
The following table summarizes certain financial information for each of the Partnership's business segments:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Operating
Segments | | | | |
(In thousands) | | Coal Royalty and Other | | Soda Ash | | Corporate and Financing | | Total |
| | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 210,348 |
| | $ | 47,089 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 257,437 |
|
Gain
on asset sales and disposals | | 6,498 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,498 |
|
Operating and maintenance expenses | | 32,489 |
| | 249 |
| | — |
| | 32,738 |
|
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization | | 14,932 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 14,932 |
|
General and administrative expenses | | — |
| | — |
| | 16,730 |
| | 16,730 |
|
Asset
impairments | | 148,214 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 148,214 |
|
Other expenses, net | | — |
| | — |
| | 76,735 |
| | 76,735 |
|
Net
income (loss) from continuing operations | | 21,211 |
| | 46,840 |
| | (93,465 | ) | | (25,414 | ) |
Income from
discontinued operations | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 956 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets of continuing operations | | $ | 817,768 |
| | $ | 263,080 |
| | $ | 3,353 |
| | $ | 1,084,201 |
|
Total
assets of discontinued operations | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,706 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 202,765 |
| | $ | 48,306 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 251,071 |
|
Gain
on litigation settlement | | 25,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 25,000 |
|
Gain on asset sales and disposals | | 2,441 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,441 |
|
Operating
and maintenance expenses | | 29,509 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 29,509 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
| | 21,689 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 21,689 |
|
General and administrative expenses | | — |
| | — |
| | 16,496 |
| | 16,496 |
|
Asset
impairments | | 18,280 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 18,280 |
|
Other expenses, net | | — |
| | — |
| | 70,178 |
| | 70,178 |
|
Net
income (loss) from continuing operations | | 160,728 |
| | 48,306 |
| | (86,674 | ) | | 122,360 |
|
Income from
discontinued operations | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 17,687 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets of continuing operations | | $ | 986,680 |
| | $ | 247,051 |
| | $ | 106,923 |
| | $ | 1,340,654 |
|
Total
assets of discontinued operations | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 993 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 202,323 |
| | $ | 40,457 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 242,780 |
|
Gain
on asset sales and disposals | | 3,545 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,545 |
|
Operating and maintenance expenses | | 24,883 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 24,883 |
|
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization | | 23,414 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 23,414 |
|
General and administrative expenses | | — |
| | — |
| | 18,502 |
| | 18,502 |
|
Asset
impairments | | 2,967 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,967 |
|
Other expenses, net | | — |
| | — |
| | 94,074 |
| | 94,074 |
|
Net
income (loss) from continuing operations | | 154,604 |
| | 40,457 |
| | (112,576 | ) | | 82,485 |
|
Income from
discontinued operations | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,182 |
|
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
9. Equity Investment
The Partnership accounts for its 49% investment in Ciner Wyoming using the equity method of accounting. Activity related to this investment is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| For
the Year Ended December 31, |
(In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 247,051 |
| | $ | 245,433 |
| | $ | 255,901 |
|
Income
allocation to NRP’s equity interests (1) | 52,016 |
| | 53,095 |
| | 44,846 |
|
Amortization of basis difference | (4,927 | ) | | (4,789 | ) | | (4,389 | ) |
Other
comprehensive income (loss) | 790 |
| | (138 | ) | | (1,925 | ) |
Distribution | (31,850 | ) | | (46,550 | ) | | (49,000 | ) |
Balance
at end of period | $ | 263,080 |
| | $ | 247,051 |
| | $ | 245,433 |
|
| |
(1) | Includes
reclassifications of accumulated other comprehensive loss to income allocation to NRP equity interest of $0.6 million, $0.5 million and $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. |
The difference between the amount at which the investment in Ciner Wyoming is carried and the amount of underlying equity in Ciner Wyoming's net assets was $135.8 million and $140.8 million as of December 31, 2019
and 2018, respectively. This excess basis relates to property, plant and equipment and right to mine assets. The excess basis difference that relates to property, plant and equipment is being amortized into income using the straight-line method over 28 years. The excess basis difference that relates to right to mine assets is being amortized into income using the units of production method. The following table represents summarized financial information for Ciner Wyoming as derived from their respective financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017: |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| For
the Year Ended December 31, |
(In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Net sales | $ | 522,843 |
| | $ | 486,759 |
| | $ | 497,340 |
|
Gross
profit | 131,712 |
| | 104,053 |
| | 114,202 |
|
Net income | 106,155 |
| | 108,357 |
| | 91,523 |
|
The
financial position of Ciner Wyoming is summarized as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
(In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 |
Current assets | $ | 170,696 |
| | $ | 138,080 |
|
Noncurrent
assets | 282,387 |
| | 252,743 |
|
Current liabilities | 55,339 |
| | 64,012 |
|
Noncurrent liabilities | 138,087 |
| | 109,921 |
|
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
10. Mineral Rights, Net
The Partnership’s mineral rights consist of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| 2019 | | 2018 |
(In thousands) | Carrying Value | | Accumulated Depletion | | Net Book Value | | Carrying Value | | Accumulated
Depletion | | Net Book Value |
Coal properties | $ | 981,352 |
| | $ | (420,448 | ) | | $ | 560,904 |
| | $ | 1,164,845 |
| | $ | (451,210 | ) | | $ | 713,635 |
|
Aggregates
properties | 41,486 |
| | (13,357 | ) | | 28,129 |
| | 24,920 |
| | (11,814 | ) | | 13,106 |
|
Oil
and gas royalty properties | 12,395 |
| | (7,887 | ) | | 4,508 |
| | 12,395 |
| | (7,632 | ) | | 4,763 |
|
Other | 13,156 |
| | (1,601 | ) | | 11,555 |
| | 13,158 |
| | (1,550 | ) | | 11,608 |
|
Total
mineral rights, net | $ | 1,048,389 |
| | $ | (443,293 | ) | | $ | 605,096 |
| | $ | 1,215,318 |
| | $ | (472,206 | ) | | $ | 743,112 |
|
Depletion
expense related to the Partnership’s mineral rights is included in depreciation, depletion and amortization on its Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) and totaled $12.1 million, $17.0 million and $20.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Sales of Mineral Rights
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Partnership recorded a gain of $6.5 million included in
gain on asset sales and disposals on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) primarily related to the disposal of certain coal mineral rights with a $0 net book value. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Partnership recorded a cumulative gain of $2.4 million and $3.5 million, respectively, included in gain on asset sales and disposals on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) related to sales of multiple mineral reserves. Impairment of Mineral Rights
During the years ended December 31,
2019, 2018 and 2017, the Partnership identified facts and circumstances that indicated that the carrying value of certain of its mineral rights exceed future cash flows from those assets and recorded non-cash impairment expense included in asset impairments on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Year Ended December 31, |
(In
thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Coal properties (1) | $ | 125,806 |
| | $ | 5,259 |
| | $ | 595 |
|
Aggregates
and timber royalty properties (2) | 103 |
| | 13,021 |
| | 2,372 |
|
Total | $ | 125,909 |
| | $ | 18,280 |
| | $ | 2,967 |
|
| |
(1) | The Partnership recorded $125.8 million of impairment expense during the year ended December 31,
2019 primarily due to deterioration in thermal coal markets, lessee capital constraints, thermal coal lease terminations, and expectations of further reductions in global and domestic thermal coal demand due to low natural gas prices and continued pressure on the electric power generation industry over emissions and climate change, resulting in reductions in expected cash flows (combination of lower expected coal sales volumes, sales prices, minimums and/or life of mine assumptions) on certain of our coal properties. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Partnership recorded $36.0 million to fully impair certain coal properties. In addition, NRP recorded $89.8 million of impairment expense on coal royalty properties with $97 million of net book value,
resulting in a fair value of $7.2 million at December 31, 2019. The fair value of the impaired assets at December 31, 2019 was calculated using a discount rate of 15%. The Partnership recorded $5.3 million of coal property impairments during the year ended December 31, 2018 primarily as a result of lease terminations, of which it recorded $5.0 million of impairment expense to fully impair certain coal properties during the three months ended December 31, 2018. The Partnership recorded $0.6 million of coal property impairments during the year ended
December 31, 2017. NRP compared the net book value of its coal properties to estimated undiscounted future net cash flows. If the net book value exceeded the undiscounted future cash flows, the Partnership recorded an impairment for the excess of the net book value over fair value. A discounted cash flow model was used to estimate fair value. Significant inputs used to determine fair value include estimates of future cash flows from coal sales and minimum payments, discount rate and useful economic life. Estimated cash flows are the |
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
product of a process that began with current realized pricing as of the measurement date and included an adjustment for risk related to the future realization of cash flows.
| |
(2) | The Partnership recorded $0.1 million of aggregates royalty property impairments during the year ended December 31, 2019. During the three months ended December 31, 2018, the Partnership recorded
$13.0 million of impairment expense related to an aggregates property that the Partnership owns and leases to its former construction aggregates business, which mines, produces and sells the aggregates. The fair value of the impaired asset was reduced to $2.3 million at December 31, 2018 using a discount rate of 11%. The Partnership recorded $2.4 million of aggregates and timber royalty properties impairments during the year ended December 31, 2017. NRP compared the net book value of its aggregates and timber properties to estimated undiscounted future net cash flows. If the net book value exceeded the undiscounted cash flows, the Partnership recorded an impairment for the excess of the net
book value over fair value. A discounted cash flow model was used to estimate fair value. Significant inputs used to determine fair value include estimates of future cash flows from aggregates and timber sales and minimum payments, discount rate and useful economic life. Estimated cash flows are the product of a process that began with current realized pricing as of the measurement date and included an adjustment for risk related to the future realization of cash flows. |
11. Intangible Assets, Net
The Partnership's intangible assets consist of above-market coal royalty and related transportation contracts
with subsidiaries of Foresight Energy pursuant to which the Partnership receives royalty payments for coal sales and throughput fees for the transportation and processing of coal. The Partnership's intangible assets included on its Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows: |
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
(In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 |
Intangible
assets at cost | $ | 53,878 |
| | $ | 81,109 |
|
Less: accumulated amortization | (36,191 | ) | | (38,596 | ) |
Total
intangible assets, net | $ | 17,687 |
| | $ | 42,513 |
|
Amortization expense included in depreciation, depletion and amortization on the Partnership's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) was $2.5 million, $4.3 million and $3.0 million for the years ended December 31,
2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Partnership identified facts and circumstances that indicated that the carrying value of certain of its above-market contracts exceed future cash flows from those assets and recorded a non-cash impairment expense of $22.3 million to fully impair these assets. These impairments are included in asset impairments on the Partnership's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) and resulted from deterioration in thermal coal markets, lessee capital constraints, and expectations of further reductions in global and domestic thermal coal demand
due to low natural gas prices and continued pressure on the electric power generation industry over emissions and climate change, resulting in reductions in expected cash flows (combination of lower expected coal sales volumes, sales prices and/or life of mine assumptions) on certain of our intangible assets. The estimates of amortization expense for the years ended December 31, as indicated below, are based on current mining plans and are subject to revision as those plans change in future periods.
|
| | | | |
(In thousands) | | Estimated
Amortization Expense |
2020 | | $ | 508 |
|
2021 | | 913 |
|
2022 | | 738 |
|
2023 | | 765 |
|
2024 | | 1,006 |
|
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
12. Debt, Net
The Partnership's debt consists of the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
(In
thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 |
NRP LP debt: | | | |
9.125% senior notes, with semi-annual interest payments in June and December, due June 2025 issued at par ("2025 Senior Notes") | $ | 300,000 |
| | $ | — |
|
10.500%
senior notes, with semi-annual interest payments in March and September, due March 2022, $241 million issued at par and $105 million issued at 98.75% ("2022 Senior Notes") | — |
| | 345,638 |
|
Opco debt: | | | |
Revolving credit facility | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Senior
Notes | | | |
8.38% with semi-annual interest payments in March and September, with annual principal payments in March, due March 2019 | $ | — |
| | $ | 21,319 |
|
5.05% with semi-annual interest
payments in January and July, with annual principal payments in July, due July 2020 | 6,780 |
| | 15,290 |
|
5.55% with semi-annual interest payments in June and December, with annual principal payments in June, due June 2023 | 9,458 |
| | 13,414 |
|
4.73%
with semi-annual interest payments in June and December, with annual principal payments in December, due December 2023 | 24,016 |
| | 37,195 |
|
5.82% with semi-annual interest payments in March and September, with annual principal payments in March, due March 2024 | 63,423 |
| | 89,529 |
|
8.92%
with semi-annual interest payments in March and September, with annual principal payments in March, due March 2024 | 20,059 |
| | 27,185 |
|
5.03% with semi-annual interest payments in June and December, with annual principal payments in December, due December 2026 | 79,945 |
| | 107,013 |
|
5.18%
with semi-annual interest payments in June and December, with annual principal payments in December, due December 2026 | 20,375 |
| | 30,555 |
|
Total Opco Senior Notes | $ | 224,056 |
| | $ | 341,500 |
|
Total
debt at face value | $ | 524,056 |
| | $ | 687,138 |
|
Net unamortized debt discount | — |
| | (1,266 | ) |
Net
unamortized debt issuance costs | (7,858 | ) | | (13,114 | ) |
Total debt, net | $ | 516,198 |
| | $ | 672,758 |
|
Less:
current portion of long-term debt | (45,776 | ) | | (115,184 | ) |
Total long-term debt, net | $ | 470,422 |
| | $ | 557,574 |
|
NRP
LP Debt
2025 Senior Notes
In April 2019, NRP and NRP Finance issued the 2025 Senior Notes and used the $300 million proceeds and $76 million of cash on hand to fund the redemption of the 2022 Senior Notes. The 2025 Senior Notes were issued under an Indenture dated as of April 29, 2019 (the "2025 Indenture"), bear interest at 9.125% per year and mature on June 30, 2025. Interest is payable semi-annually on June 30 and December 30 beginning December
30, 2019.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
NRP and NRP Finance have the option to redeem the 2025 Senior Notes, in whole or in part, at any time on or after October 30, 2021, at the redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) of 104.563% for the 12-month period beginning October
30, 2021, 102.281% for the 12-month period beginning October 30, 2022, and thereafter at 100.000%, together, in each case, with any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. Furthermore, before October 30, 2021, NRP may on any one or more occasions redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2025 Senior Notes with the net proceeds of certain public or private equity offerings at a redemption price of 109.125% of the principal amount of 2025 Senior Notes, plus any accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption, if at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2025 Senior Notes issued under
the 2025 Indenture remains outstanding immediately after such redemption and the redemption occurs within 180 days of the closing date of such equity offering. In the event of a change of control, as defined in the 2025 Indenture, the holders of the 2025 Senior Notes may require us to purchase their 2025 Senior Notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the 2025 Senior Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. The 2025 Senior Notes were issued at par. The 2025 Senior Notes are the senior unsecured obligations of NRP and NRP Finance. The 2025 Senior Notes rank equal in right of payment to all existing and future senior unsecured debt of NRP and NRP Finance and senior in right
of payment to any of NRP's subordinated debt. The 2025 Senior Notes are effectively subordinated in right of payment to all future secured debt of NRP and NRP Finance to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness and are structurally subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future debt and other liabilities of our subsidiaries, including the Opco Credit Facility and each series of Opco’s existing senior notes. None of NRP's subsidiaries guarantee the 2025 Senior Notes. As of December 31, 2019, NRP and NRP Finance were in compliance with the terms of the Indenture relating
to their 2025 Senior Notes. 2022 Senior Notes
During the second quarter of 2019, the Partnership redeemed the 2022 Senior Notes at a redemption price equal to 105.250% of the principal amount of the 2022 Senior Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest. In connection with the early redemption, the Partnership paid an $18.1 million call premium and also wrote off $10.4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs and debt discount. These expenses are included in loss on extinguishment of debt on the Partnership's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). As of December 31, 2018, NRP and NRP Finance were in compliance with the terms of the Indenture
relating to their 2022 Senior Notes. Opco Debt
All of Opco’s debt is guaranteed by its wholly owned subsidiaries and is secured by certain of the assets of Opco and its wholly owned subsidiaries other than NRP Trona LLC. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, Opco was in compliance with the terms of the financial covenants contained in its debt agreements.
Opco Credit Facility
In
April 2019, the Partnership entered into the Fourth Amendment (the “Fourth Amendment”) to the Opco Credit Facility (the "Opco Credit Facility"). The Fourth Amendment extends the term of the Opco Credit Facility until April 2023. Lender commitments under the Opco Credit Facility remain at $100.0 million.
Indebtedness under the Opco Credit Facility bears interest, at Opco's option, at:
| |
• | the higher of (i) the prime rate as announced by the agent bank; (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%; or (iii) LIBOR plus 1%, in each case plus an applicable margin ranging from 2.50%
to 3.50%; or |
| |
• | a rate equal to LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 3.50% to 4.50%. |
As of December 31, 2019, the Partnership did not have any borrowings outstanding under the Opco Credit Facility and had $100.0 million in available borrowing capacity. The weighted average interest rate for the borrowings outstanding under the Opco Credit Facility during
the year ended December 31, 2018 was 6.23%. Opco will incur a commitment fee on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility at a rate of 0.50% per annum. Opco may prepay all amounts outstanding under the Opco Credit Facility at any time without penalty.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
The
Opco Credit Facility contains financial covenants requiring Opco to maintain:
| |
• | A leverage ratio of consolidated indebtedness to EBITDDA (as defined in the Opco Credit Facility) not to exceed 4.0x; provided, however, that if the Partnership increases its quarterly distribution to its common unitholders above $0.45 per common unit, the maximum leverage ratio under the Opco Credit Facility will permanently decrease from 4.0x to 3.0x; and |
| |
• | a
fixed charge coverage ratio of consolidated EBITDDA to consolidated fixed charges (consisting of consolidated interest expense and consolidated lease expense) of not less than 3.5 to 1.0. |
The Opco Credit Facility contains certain additional customary negative covenants that, among other items, restrict Opco’s ability to incur additional debt, grant liens on its assets, make investments, sell assets and engage in business combinations. Included in the investment covenant are restrictions upon Opco’s ability to acquire assets where Opco does not maintain certain levels of liquidity. In addition, Opco is required to use 75% of the net cash proceeds of certain non-ordinary course asset sales to repay the Opco Credit Facility (without any corresponding commitment reduction) and use the remaining 25%
of the net cash proceeds to offer to repay its Senior Notes on a pro-rata basis, as described below under “—Opco Senior Notes.” The Opco Credit Facility also contains customary events of default, including cross-defaults under Opco’s Senior Notes.
The Opco Credit Facility is collateralized and secured by liens on certain of Opco’s assets with carrying values of $399.7 million and $548.9 million classified as mineral rights, net and other assets, net on the Partnership’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The collateral includes (1) the equity interests
in all of Opco’s wholly owned subsidiaries, other than NRP Trona LLC (which owns a 49% non-controlling equity interest in Ciner Wyoming), (2) the personal property and fixtures owned by Opco’s wholly owned subsidiaries, other than NRP Trona LLC, (3) Opco’s material coal royalty revenue producing properties, and (4) certain of Opco’s coal-related infrastructure assets. Opco Senior Notes
Opco has issued several series of private placement senior notes (the "Opco Senior Notes") with various interest rates and principal due dates. As of December 31,
2019 and 2018, the Opco Senior Notes had cumulative principal balances of $224.1 million and $341.5 million, respectively. Opco made mandatory principal payments on the Opco Senior Notes of $117.4 million, $80.7 million and $80.8 million during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The payments made during the year ended December 31, 2019 included a $49.3
million pre-payment as a result of the sale of the Partnership's construction aggregates business. The Note Purchase Agreements relating to the Opco Senior Notes contain covenants requiring Opco to:
| |
• | maintain a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated EBITDDA (as defined in the note purchase agreement) of no more than 4.0 to 1.0 for the four most recent quarters; |
| |
• | not permit debt secured by certain liens and debt
of subsidiaries to exceed 10% of consolidated net tangible assets (as defined in the note purchase agreement); and |
| |
• | maintain the ratio of consolidated EBITDDA (as defined in the note purchase agreement) to consolidated fixed charges (consisting of consolidated interest expense and consolidated operating lease expense) at not less than 3.5 to 1.0. |
In addition, the Note Purchase Agreements include a covenant that provides that, in the event NRP Operating
or any of its subsidiaries is subject to any additional or more restrictive covenants under the agreements governing its material indebtedness (including the Opco Credit Facility and all renewals, amendments or restatements thereof), such covenants shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference in the Note Purchase Agreements and the holders of the Notes shall receive the benefit of such additional or more restrictive covenants to the same extent as the lenders under such material indebtedness agreement.
The 8.92% Opco Senior Notes also provides that in the event that Opco’s leverage ratio of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated EBITDDA (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreements) exceeds
3.75 to 1.00 at the end of any fiscal quarter, then in addition to all other interest accruing on these notes, additional interest in the amount of 2.00% per annum shall accrue on the notes for the two succeeding quarters and for as long thereafter as the leverage ratio remains above 3.75 to 1.00. Opco has not exceeded the 3.75 to 1.00 ratio at the end of any fiscal quarter through December 31, 2019.
NATURAL
RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
In September 2016, Opco amended the Opco Senior Notes. Under this amendment, Opco agreed to use certain asset sale proceeds to make mandatory prepayment offers on the Opco Senior Notes as follows:
| |
• | until the earlier of the time that (1) Opco has sold $300 million of assets and (2) June 30, 2020, Opco will be required to make prepayment offers to the holders of the Opco Senior Notes using 25%
of the net cash proceeds from certain asset sales; and |
| |
• | after the earlier to occur of the dates above, Opco will be required to make prepayment offers to the holders of the Opco Senior Notes using an amount of net cash proceeds from certain asset sales that will be calculated pro-rata based on the amount of Opco Senior Notes then outstanding compared to the other total Opco senior debt outstanding that is being prepaid. |
The mandatory prepayment offers described above will be made pro-rata across each series of outstanding Opco Senior Notes and will not require any make-whole payment by Opco. In addition, the remaining principal and
interest payments on the Opco Senior Notes will be adjusted accordingly based on the amount of Opco Senior Notes actually prepaid. The prepayments do not affect the maturity dates of any series of the Opco Senior Notes.
Consolidated Principal Payments
The consolidated principal payments due are set forth below:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| NRP
LP | | Opco | |
(In thousands) | Senior Notes | | Senior Notes | | Credit Facility | | Total |
2020 | $ | — |
| | $ | 46,176 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 46,176 |
|
2021 | — |
| | 39,396 |
| | — |
| | 39,396 |
|
2022 | — |
| | 39,396 |
| | — |
| | 39,396 |
|
2023 | — |
| | 39,396 |
| | — |
| | 39,396 |
|
2024 | — |
| | 31,028 |
| | — |
| | 31,028 |
|
Thereafter | 300,000 |
| | 28,664 |
| | — |
| | 328,664 |
|
| $ | 300,000 |
|
| $ | 224,056 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 524,056 |
|
13. Fair
Value Measurements
Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities
The Partnership’s financial assets and liabilities consist of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, contract receivable and debt. The carrying amounts reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash approximate fair value due to their short-term nature. There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the years ended December 31, 2019 or 2018. The
Partnership uses available market data and valuation methodologies to estimate the fair value of its debt and contract receivable.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
The following table shows the carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Partnership's debt and contract
receivable: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 |
(In
thousands) | Fair Value Hierarchy Level | | Carrying Value | | Estimated
Fair Value | | Carrying
Value | | Estimated
Fair Value |
Debt: | | | | | | | | | |
NRP
2025 Senior Notes | 1 | | $ | 294,084 |
| | $ | 269,250 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
NRP
2022 Senior Notes | 1 | | — |
| | — |
| | 334,024 |
| | 356,871 |
|
Opco
Senior Notes | 3 | | 222,114 |
| | 201,090 |
| | 338,734 |
| | 352,599 |
|
Opco
Credit Facility | 3 | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
Contract
receivable (current and long-term) | 3 | | $ | 38,945 |
| | $ | 33,460 |
| | $ | 40,776 |
| | $ | 34,704 |
|
NRP
has embedded derivatives in the preferred units related to certain conversion options, redemption features and the change of control provision that are accounted for separately from the preferred units as assets and liabilities at fair value on the Partnership's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Level 3 valuation of the embedded derivatives are based on numerous factors including the likelihood of the event occurring. The embedded derivatives are revalued quarterly and changes in their fair value would be recorded in other expenses, net on the Partnership's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). The embedded derivatives had zero value as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. Fair Value
of Non-Financial Assets
The Partnership discloses or recognizes its non-financial assets, such as impairments of coal and aggregates properties and other assets, at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Refer to Note 10. Mineral Rights, Net and Note 11. Intangible Assets, Net for additional disclosures related to the fair value associated with the impaired assets. 14. Related Party Transactions
Affiliates of our General Partner
The
Partnership’s general partner does not receive any management fee or other compensation for its management of NRP. However, in accordance with the partnership agreement, the general partner and its affiliates are reimbursed for services provided to the Partnership and for expenses incurred on the Partnership’s behalf. Employees of Quintana Minerals Corporation ("QMC") and Western Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership ("WPPLP"), affiliates of the Partnership, provide their services to manage the Partnership's business. QMC and WPPLP charge the Partnership the portion of their employee salary and benefits costs related to their employee services provided to NRP. These QMC and WPPLP employee management service costs are presented as operating and maintenance expenses and general and administrative expenses on the Partnership's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). NRP also reimburses overhead costs incurred by its affiliates to manage
the Partnership's business. These overhead costs include certain rent, information technology, administration of employee benefits and other corporate services incurred by or on behalf of the Partnership’s general partner and its affiliates and are presented as operating and maintenance expenses and general and administrative expenses on the Partnership's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Direct general and administrative expenses charged to the Partnership by QMC and WPPLP are included on the Partnership's Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| For
the Year Ended December 31, |
(In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Operating and maintenance expenses | $ | 6,436 |
| | $ | 6,170 |
| | $ | 6,184 |
|
General
and administrative expenses | 3,548 |
| | 3,658 |
| | 4,989 |
|
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
The Partnership had accounts payable to QMC of $0.4 million and $0.5 million on its Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively and $0.1 million of accounts payable to WPPLP as of December 31, 2019. During the years ended December 31,
2019, 2018 and 2017, the Partnership recognized $4.0 million, $5.4 million and $1.5 million in operating and maintenance expenses, respectively, on its Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) related to an overriding royalty agreement with WPPLP. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Partnership had $0.1 million and $1.4 million, respectively of accounts payable on its Consolidated Balance Sheets to WPPLP for this agreement.
Industrial Minerals Group LLC
Corbin J. Robertson, III, a Director of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC, owns a minority ownership interest in Industrial Minerals Group LLC (“Industrial Minerals”), which, through its subsidiaries, leases two of NRP's coal royalty properties in Central Appalachia. Coal royalty related revenues from Industrial Minerals totaled $1.7 million, $0.8 million and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018
and 2017, respectively. The Partnership had accounts receivable from Industrial Minerals of $0.7 million and $0.1 million on its Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Quinwood Coal Company Royalty
In May 2017, a subsidiary of Alpha Natural Resources assigned two coal leases with us to Quinwood Coal Company ("Quinwood"), an entity wholly owned by Corbin J. Robertson III. Coal related revenues from Quinwood totaled $0.2 million,
$0.0 million and $0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Quintana Capital Group GP, Ltd.
Corbin J. Robertson, Jr. is a principal in Quintana Capital Group GP, Ltd. ("Quintana Capital"), which controls several private equity funds focused on investments in the energy business. In connection with the formation of Quintana Capital, the Partnership adopted a formal conflicts policy that establishes the opportunities that will be pursued by the Partnership and those that will be pursued by Quintana Capital. The governance documents of Quintana Capital’s
affiliated investment funds reflect the guidelines set forth in the Partnership's conflicts policy. At December 31, 2019, a fund controlled by Quintana Capital owned a substantial interest in Corsa Coal Corp. ("Corsa"), a coal mining company traded on the TSX Venture Exchange that was one of the Partnership’s lessees in Tennessee. During the second quarter of 2018, Corsa assigned its lease with NRP to a third party and is no longer deemed a related party as of such date. Coal related revenues from Corsa totaled $0.5 million and $1.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively. Cline Affiliates and Foresight Energy
Mr. Chris Cline, both individually and through another affiliate, Adena Minerals, LLC ("Adena"), owned a 31% interest in NRP (GP) LP, NRP's general partner ("NRP GP"), through May 9, 2017. On May 9, 2017, Adena sold its 31% limited partner interest in NRP GP to Great Northern Properties Limited Partnership (“GNPLP”) and WPPLP (the “Adena Sale”). GNPLP and WPPLP are companies controlled by Corbin J. Robertson, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GP Natural Resource Partners
LLC (the general partner of NRP GP) (“GP LLC”). Upon closing of this transaction, NRP no longer considers the various companies affiliated with Chris Cline, including Foresight Energy to be affiliates of NRP. As a result, all transactions (including revenues, expenses and cash flows) after May 9, 2017 with the various companies affiliated with Chris Cline, including Foresight Energy, are considered to be third-party transactions.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
Revenues
and expenses related to transactions with Foresight Energy are included on the Partnership's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Year Ended December 31, |
(In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Revenues: | | | | | |
Coal
royalty and other (1) | $ | 39,755 |
| | $ | 30,777 |
| | $ | 49,967 |
|
Transportation and processing services (2) | 19,168 |
| | 23,818 |
| | 20,522 |
|
Total | $ | 58,923 |
| | $ | 54,595 |
| | $ | 70,489 |
|
| | | | | |
Operating
and maintenance expenses (3) | $ | 1,329 |
| | $ | 1,761 |
| | $ | 1,518 |
|
| |
(1) | Included
in 2017 coal royalty and other revenues was $21.2 million of related party revenues earned from Foresight Energy prior to May 9, 2017. |
| |
(2) | Included in 2017 transportation and processing services revenues was $6.0 million of related party revenues earned from Foresight Energy prior to May 9, 2017. |
| |
(3) | Included in 2017 operating and
maintenance expenses was $0.5 million of related party expenses incurred from Foresight Energy prior to May 9, 2017. |
Coal Royalty and Other Revenues
Various subsidiaries of Foresight Energy lease coal reserves from the Partnership. In addition, NRP owns a contractual overriding royalty interest at Foresight Energy's Sugar Camp mine in the Illinois Basin which provides for payments based upon production from specific tons at Foresight Energy's Sugar Camp operations on certain reserves owned by another affiliate of Chris Cline. Revenues related to these transactions are included in coal
royalty and other revenues on the Partnership's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Transportation and Processing Services Revenues and Expenses
The Partnership owns transportation and processing infrastructure related to certain of its coal properties, including loadout and other transportation assets at Foresight Energy's Williamson and Macoupin mines in the Illinois Basin, for which it collects throughput fees. These fees are included in transportation and processing services revenues on the Partnership's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
NRP is responsible for operating and maintaining the rail loadout transportation assets at the Williamson mine
and subcontracts the operating responsibilities to a subsidiary of Foresight Energy. Expenses related to these operations are included in operating and maintenance expenses on the Partnership's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
In addition, NRP owns rail loadout and associated infrastructure at the Sugar Camp mine, an Illinois Basin mine also operated by a subsidiary of Foresight Energy LP. While the Partnership owns coal reserves at the Williamson and Macoupin mines, it does not own coal reserves at the Sugar Camp mine. The infrastructure at the Sugar Camp mine is leased to a subsidiary of Foresight Energy and NRP collects minimums and throughput fees, which are considered a return of a financing receivable or included in transportation and processing services revenues on the Partnership's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). See Note
18. Financing Transaction for more information.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
15. Major Customers
Revenues from customers that exceeded 10 percent of total revenues for any
of the periods presented below are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
(In
thousands) | | Revenues | | Percent | | Revenues | | Percent | | Revenues | | Percent |
Foresight Energy (1) | | $ | 58,923 |
| | 22.9 | % | | $ | 54,595 |
| | 21.7 | % | | $ | 70,489 |
| | 29.0 | % |
Contura
Energy (1) (2) | | 40,743 |
| | 15.8 | % | | 24,580 |
| | 9.8 | % | | 20,172 |
| | 8.3 | % |
| |
(1) | Revenues
from Foresight Energy and Contura Energy are included within the Partnership's Coal Royalty and Other segment. |
| |
(2) | In the fourth quarter of 2018, Contura Energy and Alpha Natural Resources merged. Revenues during the year ended December 31, 2019 relate to the combined company, while revenues during the year ended December 31, 2018 do not include revenues from Alpha Natural Resources until the date of the merger. Revenues during the year ended December 31, 2017
do not include revenues from Alpha Natural Resources. |
16. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal
NRP is involved, from time to time, in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. While the ultimate results of these proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, Partnership management believes these ordinary course matters will not have a material effect on the Partnership’s financial position, liquidity or operations. During 2019, NRP was also involved in the legal proceeding described below.
In January 2013, NRP acquired a non-controlling
48.51% general partner interest in OCI Wyoming, L.P. ("OCI LP") and all of the preferred stock and a portion of the common stock of OCI Wyoming Co. ("OCI Co") (which in turn owned a 1% limited partner interest in OCI LP) from Anadarko Holding Company and its subsidiary, Big Island Trona Company (together, "Anadarko"). The remaining general partner interest in OCI LP and common stock of OCI Co were owned by subsidiaries of OCI Chemical Corporation.
The acquisition agreement provided for additional contingent consideration of up to $50 million to be paid by NRP if certain performance criteria were met at OCI LP as defined in the purchase
and sale agreement in any of the years 2013, 2014 or 2015. For those years, NRP paid an aggregate of $11.5 million to Anadarko in full satisfaction of these contingent consideration payment obligations.
In July 2013, pursuant to a series of transactions in connection with an initial public offering by a subsidiary of OCI Chemical Corporation, the ownership structure in OCI LP was simplified. In connection with such reorganization, NRP exchanged the stock of OCI Co for a limited partner interest in OCI LP. Following the reorganization, NRP's interest in OCI LP remained at 49%, consisting of both limited and general partner interests. The restructuring did not have any impact on the operations, revenues, management or control of OCI LP.
In
July 2017, Anadarko filed a lawsuit against Opco and NRP Trona LLC in the District Court of Harris County, Texas, 157th Judicial District. The complaint alleged that the transactions conducted in 2013 triggered an acceleration of NRP's obligation under the purchase agreement with Anadarko to pay additional contingent consideration in full and demanded immediate payment of such amount, together with interest, court costs and attorneys’ fees.
In November 2019, the trial court ruled in NRP’s favor in all respects, including that the internal restructuring that occurred did not trigger an acceleration of the contingent purchase price payment obligation under the purchase agreement with Anadarko. Accordingly, the trial court ordered that Anadarko take nothing. Anadarko did not appeal the trial court's ruling, and this case is concluded with no liability to the Partnership.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
Environmental Compliance
The operations the Partnership’s lessees conduct on its properties, as well as the industrial minerals, aggregates and oil and gas operations in which the Partnership has interests, are subject to federal and state environmental laws and regulations. See "Items 1. and 2. Business and Properties—Regulation and Environmental Matters." As an owner of surface interests in some properties, the Partnership may be liable for
certain environmental conditions occurring on the surface properties. The terms of substantially all of the Partnership’s coal leases require the lessee to comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including environmental laws and regulations. Lessees post reclamation bonds assuring that reclamation will be completed as required by the relevant permit, and substantially all of the leases require the lessee to indemnify the Partnership against, among other things, environmental liabilities. Some of these indemnifications survive the termination of the lease. The Partnership makes regular visits to the mines to ensure compliance with lease terms, but the duty to comply with all regulations rests with the lessees. The Partnership believes that its lessees will be able to comply with existing regulations and does not expect that any lessee’s failure to comply with environmental laws and regulations will have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial condition
or results of operations. The Partnership has neither incurred, nor is aware of, any material environmental charges imposed on the Partnership related to its properties for the period ended December 31, 2019. The Partnership is not associated with any material environmental contamination that may require remediation costs. However, the Partnership’s lessees are required to conduct reclamation work on the properties under lease to them. Because the Partnership is not the permittee of the mines being reclaimed, the Partnership is not responsible for the costs associated with these reclamation operations. As a former owner of the working interests in oil and natural gas operations, the Partnership is responsible for its proportionate share of any losses and liabilities, including environmental liabilities, arising from uninsured and underinsured events during the period it was
an owner.
17. Unit-Based Compensation
2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan
In December 2017, the 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2017 LTIP”) was approved and it became effective in January 2018. The 2017 LTIP authorizes 800,000 common units that are available for delivery by the Partnership pursuant to awards under the plan. The term is 10 years from the date of approval of the Board of Directors or, if earlier, the date the 2017 LTIP is terminated by the Board of Directors or the committee appointed by the Board of Directors to administer the 2017 LTIP, or the date all
available common units available have been delivered. Common units delivered pursuant to the 2017 LTIP will consist, in whole or part, of (i) common units acquired in the open market, (ii) common units acquired from the Partnership (including newly issued units), any of our affiliates or any other person or (iii) any combination of the foregoing.
Employees, consultants and non-employee directors of the Partnership, the General Partner, GP LLC and their affiliates are generally eligible to receive awards under the 2017 LTIP. The 2017 LTIP provides for the issuance of a variety of equity-based grants, including grants of (i) options, (ii) unit appreciation rights, (iii) restricted units, (iv) phantom units, (v) cash awards, (vi) performance awards, (vii) distribution equivalent rights, and (viii) other unit-based awards. The plan is administered by the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee ("CNG Committee")
of the Board of Directors, which determines the terms and conditions of awards granted under the 2017 LTIP. The Partnership recognizes forfeitures for any awards issued under this plan as they occur.
Unit-Based Awards
Unit-based awards under the 2017 LTIP are generally issued to certain employees and non-employee directors of the Partnership. Awards granted to employees vest at the end of a 3 year period and awards granted to non-employee directors are immediately vested. Directors are given the option to take immediate issuance of the vested awards or defer such issuance until a later date. Upon deferral of issuance, such units will continue to accumulate distribution equivalent rights ("DERs") until issuance.
In connection with the phantom
unit awards, the CNG Committee also granted tandem DERs, which entitle the holders to receive distributions equal to the distributions paid on the Partnership’s common units between the date the units are granted and the vesting date. The DERs are payable in cash upon vesting but may be subject to forfeiture if the grantee ceases employment prior to vesting.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
The awards granted in 2019 and
2018 were valued using the closing price of NRP's units as of the grant date. The grant date fair value of these awards granted during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were $5.4 million and $2.2 million, respectively. Total unit-based compensation expense associated with these awards was $2.4 million and $1.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and is included in general
and administrative expenses and operating and maintenance expenses on the Partnership's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). The unamortized cost associated with unvested outstanding awards as of December 31, 2019 is $3.5 million, which is to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.0 years. The unamortized cost associated with unvested outstanding awards as of December 31, 2018 was $1.2 million. A summary of the unit activity in the outstanding grants during 2019 is as follows:
|
| | | | | | |
(In
thousands) | Common Units | | Weighted Average Exercise Price |
| 55 |
| | $ | 29.10 |
|
Granted | 129 |
| | $ | 41.41 |
|
Fully
vested and issued | (12 | ) | | $ | 41.47 |
|
Forfeitures | (15 | ) | | $ | 37.33 |
|
| 157 |
| | $ | 37.48 |
|
18. Financing Transaction
The Partnership owns rail loadout and associated infrastructure at the Sugar Camp mine in the Illinois Basin operated by a subsidiary of Foresight Energy. The infrastructure at the Sugar Camp mine is leased to a subsidiary of Foresight
Energy and is accounted for as a financing transaction (the "Sugar Camp lease"). The Sugar Camp lease expires in 2032 with renewal options for up to 80 additional years. Minimum payments are $5.0 million per year through the end of the lease term. The Partnership is also entitled to variable payments in the form of throughput fees determined based on the amount of coal transported and processed utilizing the Partnership's assets. In the event the Sugar Camp lease is renewed beyond 2032, payments become a fixed $10 thousand per year for the remainder of the renewed term.
The following table shows certain amounts related to the Partnership's Sugar Camp lease through 2032:
|
| | | | | | | |
| December
31, |
(In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 |
Accounts receivable | $ | 540 |
| | $ | 661 |
|
Contract
receivable (current and long-term) | 38,945 |
| | 40,776 |
|
Unearned income | 21,889 |
| | 25,058 |
|
Projected remaining payments | $ | 61,374 |
| | $ | 66,495 |
|
19. Leases
Lessee Accounting
As of December 31, 2019, the Partnership had one operating lease for an office building that is owned by WPPLP. On January 1, 2019, the Partnership entered into a new lease of the building with a five-year base term and five additional five-year renewal options. Upon lease commencement and as of December 31, 2019, the Partnership was reasonably certain to exercise all renewal options included in the lease and capitalized the right-of-use asset and corresponding lease liability on its Consolidated
Balance Sheet using the present value of the future lease payments over 30 years. The Partnership's right-of-use asset and lease liability included within other assets and other non-current liabilities, respectively, on its Consolidated Balance Sheet totaled $3.5 million at both January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Partnership incurred total operating lease expenses of $0.5 million, included in both operating and maintenance expenses and general and administrative expenses on its Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED
The following table details the maturity analysis of the Partnership's operating lease liability and reconciles the undiscounted cash flows to the operating lease liability included on its Consolidated Balance Sheet:
|
| | | | |
Remaining Annual Lease Payments (In thousands) | | |
2020 | | $ | 483 |
|
2021 | | 483 |
|
2022 | | 483 |
|
2023 | | 483 |
|
2024 | | 483 |
|
After
2024 | | 11,597 |
|
Total lease payments (1) | | $ | 14,012 |
|
Less: present value adjustment (2) | | (10,506 | ) |
Total
operating lease liability | | $ | 3,506 |
|
| |
(1) | The
remaining lease term of the Partnership's operating lease is 29 years. |
| |
(2) | The present value of the operating lease liability on the Partnership's Consolidated Balance Sheet was calculated using a 13.5% discount rate which represents the Partnership's estimated incremental borrowing rate under the lease. As the Partnership's lease does not provide an implicit rate, the Partnership estimated the incremental borrowing rate at the time the lease was entered into by utilizing the rate of the Partnership's secured debt and adjusting it for factors that reflect the profile of borrowing over the 30-year expected lease
term. |
Lessor Accounting
The Partnership owns loadout and other transportation assets at the Partnership's Macoupin property in the Illinois Basin which is operated by Foresight Energy. The infrastructure at the Macoupin property is leased to a subsidiary of Foresight Energy and is accounted for as an operating lease under ASC 842. The lease with Macoupin expires in January 2108. From the inception of this lease in 2009 through January 2039, the lease provides that the Partnership is entitled to variable lease payments in the form of throughput fees determined based on the amount of coal transported and processed utilizing the Partnership's assets. These fees are included in transportation and processing services revenues on the Partnership's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) and were $4.8
million, $5.0 million and $4.2 million in the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. After January 2039, the lease provides that the Partnership is entitled to an annual rent of $10 thousand per year in place of the variable lease payments.
NATURAL
RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL QUARTERLY INFORMATION
(Unaudited)
Quarterly Financial Data
The following table summarizes quarterly financial data for 2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In
thousands, except per unit data) | First
Quarter | | Second
Quarter (1) | | Third
Quarter | | Fourth
Quarter (2) | | Total
2019 |
Revenues | $ | 66,785 |
| | $ | 81,223 |
| | $ | 57,602 |
| | $ | 51,827 |
| | $ | 257,437 |
|
Gain
(loss) on asset sales and disposals | 256 |
| | 246 |
| | 6,107 |
| | (111 | ) | | 6,498 |
|
Asset
impairments | — |
| | — |
| | 484 |
| | 147,730 |
| | 148,214 |
|
Income
(loss) from operations | 49,939 |
| | 60,844 |
| | 49,594 |
| | (109,056 | ) | | 51,321 |
|
Loss
on extinguishment of debt | — |
| | 29,282 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 29,282 |
|
Net
income (loss) from continuing operations | 35,765 |
| | 19,106 |
| | 39,163 |
| | (119,448 | ) | | (25,414 | ) |
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations | (46 | ) | | 245 |
| | 7 |
| | 750 |
| | 956 |
|
Net
income (loss) | 35,719 |
| | 19,351 |
| | 39,170 |
| | (118,698 | ) | | (24,458 | ) |
Net
income (loss) attributable to NRP | 35,719 |
| | 19,351 |
| | 39,170 |
| | (118,698 | ) | | (24,458 | ) |
Net
income (loss) attributable to common unitholders and general partner | 28,219 |
| | 11,851 |
| | 31,670 |
| | (126,198 | ) | | (54,458 | ) |
Income
(loss) from continuing operations per common unit | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | $ | 2.26 |
| | $ | 0.93 |
| | $ | 2.53 |
| | $ | (10.15 | ) | | $ | (4.43 | ) |
Diluted | 1.75 |
| | 0.85 |
| | 1.66 |
| | (10.15 | ) | | (4.43 | ) |
Net
income (loss) per common unit | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | $ | 2.26 |
| | $ | 0.95 |
| | $ | 2.53 |
| | $ | (10.09 | ) | | $ | (4.35 | ) |
Diluted | 1.75 |
| | 0.87 |
| | 1.66 |
| | (10.09 | ) | | (4.35 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Weighted
average number of common units outstanding (basic) | 12,255 |
| | 12,261 |
| | 12,261 |
| | 12,261 |
| | 12,260 |
|
Weighted
average number of common units outstanding (diluted) | 20,015 |
| | 13,388 |
| | 23,157 |
| | 12,261 |
| | 12,260 |
|
| |
(1) | During
the second quarter of 2019 the Partnership incurred a $29.3 million loss on extinguishment of debt related to the 105.250% premium paid to redeem the 2022 Senior Notes as well as the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs and debt discount related to the 2022 Senior Notes. See Note 12. Debt, Net for more information. |
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL QUARTERLY INFORMATION
(Unaudited)
The following table summarizes quarterly financial
data for 2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands, except per unit data) | First
Quarter | | Second
Quarter | | Third
Quarter
| | Fourth
Quarter (1)(2)(3) | | Total
2018 |
Revenues | $ | 59,478 |
| | $ | 69,451 |
| | $ | 58,207 |
| | $ | 63,935 |
| | $ | 251,071 |
|
Gain
on litigation settlement | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 25,000 |
| | 25,000 |
|
Gain
on asset sales and disposals | 651 |
| | 168 |
| | — |
| | 1,622 |
| | 2,441 |
|
Asset
impairments | 242 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 18,038 |
| | 18,280 |
|
Income
from operations | 44,236 |
| | 52,863 |
| | 43,346 |
| | 52,093 |
| | 192,538 |
|
Net
income from continuing operations | 26,286 |
| | 35,129 |
| | 25,853 |
| | 35,092 |
| | 122,360 |
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations | (1,948 | ) | | 2,981 |
| | 2,688 |
| | 13,966 |
| | 17,687 |
|
Net
income | 24,338 |
| | 38,110 |
| | 28,541 |
| | 49,058 |
| | 140,047 |
|
Net
income attributable to NRP | 24,338 |
| | 37,241 |
| | 28,900 |
| | 49,058 |
| | 139,537 |
|
Net
income attributable to common unitholders and general partner | 16,838 |
| | 29,741 |
| | 21,400 |
| | 41,558 |
| | 109,537 |
|
Income
from continuing operations per common unit | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | $ | 1.50 |
| | $ | 2.14 |
| | $ | 1.50 |
| | $ | 2.21 |
| | $ | 7.35 |
|
Diluted | 1.16 |
| | 1.57 |
| | 1.18 |
| | 1.69 |
| | 5.90 |
|
Net
income per common unit | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | $ | 1.35 |
| | $ | 2.38 |
| | $ | 1.71 |
| | $ | 3.33 |
| | $ | 8.77 |
|
Diluted | 1.08 |
| | 1.71 |
| | 1.30 |
| | 2.36 |
| | 6.76 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Weighted
average number of common units outstanding (basic) | 12,238 |
| | 12,246 |
| | 12,246 |
| | 12,247 |
| | 12,244 |
|
Weighted
average number of common units outstanding (diluted) | 22,125 |
| | 21,383 |
| | 21,840 |
| | 20,394 |
| | 20,234 |
|
| |
(1) | During
the fourth quarter of 2018 the Partnership recorded $25 million in other income related to the Hillsboro litigation settlement. |
| |
(2) | During the fourth quarter of 2018 the Partnership sold its construction aggregates business for $205 million, before customary purchase price adjustments and transaction expenses, and recorded a gain of $13.1 million included in income from discontinued operations on the Partnership's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). See Note 4. Discontinued Operations
for more information. |
| |
(3) | During the fourth quarter of 2018 the Partnership recorded $18.0 million in aggregates and coal property impairments. See Note 10. Mineral Rights, Net for more information. |
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2019. This evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC, our managing general partner. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2019 at the reasonable assurance level in producing the timely recording, processing, summary and reporting of information and in accumulation and communication of information to management to allow for timely decisions with regard
to required disclosures.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC, our managing general partner, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 based on the framework
in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission "2013 Framework" (COSO). Based on that evaluation, as of December 31, 2019, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective at a reasonable assurance level based on those criteria. No changes were made to our internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Ernst & Young, LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm who audited the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued a report on the Partnership’s
internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Partners of Natural Resource Partners L.P.
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We
have audited Natural Resource Partners L.P.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Natural Resource Partners L.P. (the Partnership) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of Natural Resource Partners L.P. as of December 31, 2019 and 2018,
the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), partners’ capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes and our report dated February 27, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Partnership’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Houston, Texas
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM
10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE MANAGING GENERAL PARTNER AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
As a master limited partnership we do not employ any of the people responsible for the management of our properties. Instead, we reimburse affiliates of our managing general partner, GP Natural Resource Partners LLC, for their services. The following table sets forth information concerning the directors and officers of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Each officer and director is elected for their respective office or directorship on an annual basis. Subject to Board Representation and Observation Rights
Agreement with Blackstone and GoldenTree, Mr. Robertson is entitled to appoint the members of the Board of Directors of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC. Mr. Robertson has delegated the right to appoint one director to Blackstone. |
| | | | | |
Name | | Age | | Position with the General Partner |
Corbin
J. Robertson, Jr. | | 72 |
| | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
Craig W. Nunez | | 58 |
| | President and Chief Operating Officer |
Christopher J. Zolas | | 45 |
| | Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer |
Kevin J. Craig | | 51 |
| | Executive Vice President, Coal |
Kathryn S. Wilson | | 45 |
| | Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
Gregory
F. Wooten | | 63 |
| | Vice President, Chief Engineer |
Galdino J. Claro | | 60 |
| | Director |
Russell D. Gordy | | 69 |
| | Director |
Alexander
D. Greene | | 61 |
| | Director |
S. Reed Morian | | 74 |
| | Director |
Paul B. Murphy, Jr. | | 60 |
| | Director |
Richard
A. Navarre | | 59 |
| | Director |
Corbin J. Robertson, III | | 49 |
| | Director |
Stephen P. Smith | | 58 |
| | Director |
Leo
A. Vecellio, Jr. | | 73 |
| | Director |
Corbin J. Robertson, Jr. has served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC since 2002. Mr. Robertson has vast business experience having founded and served as a director and as an officer of multiple companies, both private and public, and has served on the boards of numerous non-profit organizations. He
has served as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the general partner of Great Northern Properties Limited Partnership since 1992 and Quintana Minerals Corporation since 1978, as Chairman of the Board of Directors of New Gauley Coal Corporation since 1986, and the general partner of Western Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership since 1986. In addition, Mr. Robertson served as Chief Executive Officer of the general partner of Western Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership from 1986 until 2008 and currently serves on the Board of Managers of Premium Resources, LLC. He also serves as a Principal with Quintana Capital Group, Chairman of the Board of the Cullen Trust for Higher Education and on the boards of the American Petroleum Institute, the National Petroleum Council, the Baylor College of Medicine and the Spirit Golf Association. In 2006, Mr. Robertson was inducted into the Texas Business Hall of Fame. Mr. Robertson is the father of Corbin
J. Robertson, III.
Craig W. Nunez has served as President and Chief Operating Officer of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC since August 2017 and previously served as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC from January 2015 to August 2017. Prior to joining NRP, Mr. Nunez was an owner and Chief Executive Officer of Bocage Group, a private investment company specializing in energy, natural resources and master limited partnerships since March 2012. In addition, until joining NRP, he was a FINRA-registered Investment Advisor Representative with Searle & Co since July 2012 and served as an Executive Advisor to Capital One Asset Management since January
2014. From September 2011 through March 2012, Mr. Nunez served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Quicksilver Resources Canada, Inc. Mr. Nunez was Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Halliburton Company from January 2007 until September 2011, and Vice President and Treasurer of Halliburton Company from February 2006 to January 2007. Prior to that, he was Treasurer of Colonial Pipeline Company from November 1995 to February 2006. Mr. Nunez has been involved in numerous charitable organizations and currently serves on the boards of Goodwill Industries of Houston and Medical Bridges, Inc.
Christopher
J. Zolas has served as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC since August 2017 and previously served as Chief Accounting Officer of GP Natural Resource Partners from March 2015 to August 2017. Prior to joining NRP, Mr. Zolas served as Director of Financial Reporting at Cheniere Energy, Inc., a publicly traded energy company, where he performed financial statement preparation and analysis, technical accounting and SEC reporting for five separate SEC registrants, including a master limited partnership. Mr. Zolas joined Cheniere Energy, Inc. in 2007 as Manager of SEC Reporting and Technical Accounting and was promoted to Director in 2009. Prior to joining Cheniere Energy, Inc., Mr. Zolas worked in public accounting with KPMG LLP from 2002 to 2007.
Kevin
J. Craig has served as Executive Vice President, Coal of GP Natural Resource Partners since September 2014. Mr. Craig was the Vice President of Business Development for GP Natural Resource Partners LLC since 2005. Mr. Craig also represents NRP as one of its appointees to the Board of Managers of Ciner Wyoming LLC. Mr. Craig joined NRP in 2005 from CSX Transportation, where he served as Terminal Manager for the West Virginia Coalfields. He has extensive marketing, finance and operations experience within the energy industry. Mr. Craig served as a member of the West Virginia House of Delegates having been elected in 2000 and re-elected in 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010 and 2012. In addition to other leadership positions, Delegate Craig served as Chairman of the Committee on Energy.
Mr. Craig did not seek re-election in 2014 and his term ended January 2015. Prior to joining CSX, he served as a Captain in the United States Army. Mr. Craig has served as the Chairman of the Huntington Regional Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors and continues as a member of both the West Virginia Chamber of Commerce and the Huntington Regional Chamber of Commerce’s respective board of directors. He is involved in numerous state coal associations and serves as a member of the Board of Directors of BrickStreet Mutual Insurance Company.
Kathryn S. Wilson has served as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC since December 2013. Ms. Wilson served as Associate General Counsel from March 2013 to December 2013. Since October 2013,
Ms. Wilson has also served as General Counsel and Secretary of each of New Gauley Coal Corporation and the general partner of Western Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership. She served as General Counsel of Quintana Minerals Corporation from October 2013 to November 2018 and as General Counsel of the General Partner of Great Northern Properties Limited Partnership from October 2013 to June 2019. Ms. Wilson practiced corporate and securities law with Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. from September 2001 to February 2010 and from November 2011 to February 2013. Ms. Wilson served as General Counsel of Antero Resources Corporation from March 2010 to June 2011.
Gregory F. Wooten has served as Vice President, Chief Engineer of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC since December 2013.
Mr. Wooten joined NRP in 2007, serving as Regional Manager. Prior to joining NRP, Mr. Wooten served as Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Engineer of Dingess Rum Properties, Inc., where he managed coal, oil, gas and timber properties from 1982 until 2007. Mr. Wooten has over 35 years of experience in the coal industry, working as a planning and production engineer and is a member of the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers. Mr. Wooten also serves as the President of the National Council of Coal Lessors and is a board member of the West Virginia, Kentucky, Indiana and Montana Coal Associations. He also serves on the board of the Cabell-Huntington Hospital.
Galdino J. Claro joined the Board of Directors of GP Natural Resource
Partners LLC in March 2018. Mr. Claro has 30 years of worldwide executive leadership experience in the primary and secondary metals industries. From October 2013 to August 2017, Mr. Claro served as the Group Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of Sims Metal Management where he was also a member of the Safety, Health, Environment and Sustainability Committee, the Nomination Governance Committee and the Finance Investment Committee. Before joining Sims Metal Management, Mr. Claro served for four years as the Chief Executive Officer of Harsco Metals and Minerals. He joined Harsco from Aleris, where he served as CEO of Aleris Americas. Before that, he was the CEO of the Metals Processing Group of Heico Companies LLC. During his career with Alcoa Inc., Mr. Claro served for five years as the President of Alcoa China and for six years in Europe as the Vice President of Soft Alloys Extrusions and the President of Alcoa Europe Extrusions. While in South America, Mr.
Claro worked for several different divisions of Alcoa Alumni SA as plant manager, technology manager, new products development director and Managing Director of Alcoa Cargo-Van. Before joining Alcoa in 1985, Mr. Claro started his career at Honda-Motogear as a Quality Control Manager where he worked for three years in both Brazil and Japan.
Russell D. Gordy joined the Board of Directors of GP
Natural Resource Partners in October 2013. Mr. Gordy brings extensive oil and gas industry, mineral interest and land ownership and financial experience to the Board. Mr. Gordy is currently managing partner and majority owner in SG Interests, a producer of oil and coal bed methane gas, RGGS, which controls mineral acres currently producing oil and gas, coal, iron ore, limestone, and copper, and Rock Creek Ranch. He is also President of Gordy Oil Company, an oil and gas exploration company in the Gulf Coast of Texas and Louisiana, and Gordy Gas Corporation, an oil and gas exploration company in the San Juan Basin of Colorado and New Mexico. Prior to forming SG Interests in 1989, Mr. Gordy was a founding partner of Northwind Exploration Company an exploration company created in 1981 with former Houston Oil and Minerals employees. Mr. Gordy served on the board of directors of Houston Exploration Company from 1987 until 2001.
Alexander
D. Greene joined the Board of Directors of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC in March 2019. Mr. Greene brings extensive corporate finance and private equity experience to his role on the Board, with more than 35 years investing in businesses where operational improvement and strategic guidance were primary drivers of value creation and as a financial advisor to large and mid-cap companies, boards of directors and other constituencies in complex leveraged finance, merger and acquisition and recapitalization transactions. Mr. Greene is a director of Ambac Financial Group, Inc., Element Fleet Management Corp. and is Chairman of the Board of USA Truck, Inc. In addition, Mr. Greene recently served as Chairman of the Board of Modular Space Corporation prior to its sale to Williams Scotsman in 2018. From 2005 to 2014 he was a Managing Partner and head of U.S. Private Equity
at Brookfield Asset Management, a global asset management company. Prior to Brookfield, Mr. Greene was a Managing Director and co-head of Carlyle Strategic Partners, a private equity fund, and a Managing Director and investment banker at Wasserstein Perella & Co. and Whitman Heffernan Rhein & Co. Mr. Greene is a volunteer firefighter and president of the Armonk Independent Fire Company and serves on the Budget and Finance Advisory Committee for the Town of North Castle, New York. Mr. Greene has been designated to serve as a director of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC by Blackstone Tactical Opportunities, pursuant to its right to designate a director to the Board of Directors of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC.
S.
Reed Morian joined the Board of Directors of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC in 2002. Mr. Morian has vast executive business experience having served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of several companies since the early 1980s and serving on the board of other companies. Mr. Morian has served as a member of the Board of Directors of the general partner of Western Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership since 1986, New Gauley Coal Corporation since 1992 and the general partner of Great Northern Properties Limited Partnership since 1992. Mr. Morian also serves on the Board of Managers of Premium Resources, LLC since 2006. Mr. Morian worked for Dixie Chemical Company from 1971 to 2006 and served as its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 1981 to 2006. He has also served as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of DX Holding Company since 1989.
He formerly served on the Board of Directors for the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas-Houston Branch from April 2003 until December 2008 and as a Director of Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. from March 2005 until April 2009.
Paul B. Murphy, Jr. joined the Board of Directors of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC in March 2018. Mr. Murphy is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Cadence Bancorporation and Chairman of Cadence Bank, N.A. He has served at Cadence and its predecessors since December 2009. Cadence is a $17 billion bank holding company headquartered in Houston and it is traded on the NYSE (CADE). Previously, Mr. Murphy spent 20 years at Amegy Bank of Texas, helping to steer that institution from $75 million in assets and a single location to assets
of $11 billion and 85 banking centers at the time of his departure as the Chief Executive Officer and a Director in 2009. Mr. Murphy is an advocate of the community and is a board member of Oceaneering International, Inc., Hope and Healing Center and Institute, Houston Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, and the City of Houston Complete Advisory Board.
Richard A. Navarre joined the Board of Directors of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC in October 2013. Mr. Navarre brings extensive financial, strategic planning, public company and coal industry experience to the Board of Directors. Mr. Navarre is Chairman, President and CEO of Covia Corporation. From 1993 until 2012, Mr. Navarre held several executive positions with Peabody Energy Corporation, including President-Americas from
March 2012 to June 2012, President and Chief Commercial Officer from January 2008 to March 2012, Executive Vice President of Corporate Development and Chief Financial Officer from July 2006 to January 2008 and Chief Financial Officer from October 1999 to June 2008. Mr. Navarre serves on the Board of Directors of Civeo Corporation, where he serves as Chairman, Covia Corporation, where he serves as Chairman, and Arch Coal, where he serves as Chairman of the Compensation Committee and member of the Nominating and Governance Committee. He is a member of the Hall of Fame of the College of Business and a member of the Board of Advisors of the College of Business and Administration of Southern Illinois University Carbondale. He is the former Chairman of the Bituminous Coal Operators’ Association. Mr. Navarre is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Navarre also has been involved in numerous civic and charitable organizations throughout his career.
Corbin J. Robertson, III joined the Board of Directors of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC in May 2013. Mr. Robertson has experience with investments in a variety of energy businesses, having served both in management of private equity firms and having served on several boards of directors. Mr. Robertson has served as a Co-Managing Partner of LKCM Headwater Investments GP, LLC, LKCM Headwater Investments I, L.P., LKCM Headwater Investments II, LP, LKCM Headwater Investments II Sidecar, LP, LKCM Headwater Investments III, private equity funds that began June 2011. He has served as the Chief Executive Officer of the general partner of Western
Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership since May 2008, and has served on the Board of Directors of Quintana Minerals Corporation since 2007 and Western Pocahontas since October 2012. Mr. Robertson also has served on the Board of Managers of Premium Resources, LLC since 2016. Mr. Robertson also co-founded Quintana Energy Partners, an energy-focused private equity firm in 2006, and served as a Managing Director thereof from 2006 until December 2010. Mr. Robertson has served on the Board of Directors for Quintana Minerals Corporation since October 2007, and previously served as Vice President-Acquisitions for GP Natural Resource Partners LLC from 2003 until 2005. Mr. Robertson also serves on the Board of Directors of Quality Magnetite, Quinwood Coal and LL&B Minerals, each of which is in the energy business. Mr. Robertson is the son of Corbin J. Robertson, Jr.
Stephen
P. Smith joined the Board of Directors of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC in 2004. Mr. Smith brings extensive public company financial experience in the power and energy industries to the Board of Directors. Mr. Smith formerly served as Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Director of the general partner of Columbia Pipeline Partners L.P. from September 2014 until June 2016. Mr. Smith also formerly served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Columbia Pipeline Group from July 2015 to June 2016. Mr. Smith served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for NiSource, Inc. from August 2008 to June 2015. Prior to joining NiSource, he held several positions with American Electric Power Company, Inc, including Senior Vice President - Shared Services from January 2008 to June 2008, Senior Vice President and Treasurer
from January 2004 to December 2007, and Senior Vice President - Finance from April 2003 to December 2003.
Leo A. Vecellio, Jr. joined the Board of Directors of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC in May 2007. Mr. Vecellio brings extensive experience in the aggregates and coal mine development industry to the Board of Directors. Mr. Vecellio and his family have been in the aggregates materials and construction business since the late 1930s. Since November 2002, Mr. Vecellio has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Vecellio Group, Inc, a major aggregates producer, contractor and oil terminal developer/operator in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern states. For nearly 30 years prior to that time Mr. Vecellio served in various capacities with Vecellio & Grogan,
Inc., having most recently served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from April 1996 to November 2002. Mr. Vecellio is the former Chairman of the American Road and Transportation Builders and is a longtime member of the Florida Council of 100, as well as many other civic and charitable organizations.
Corporate Governance
Board Meetings and Executive Sessions
The Board met eight times in 2019. During 2019, our non-management directors met in executive session several times. The presiding director was Mr. Vecellio, the Chairman of our Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee, or CNG Committee.
In addition, our independent directors met one time in executive session in December 2019. Mr. Vecellio was the presiding director at that meeting. Interested parties may communicate with our non-management directors by writing a letter to the Chairman of the CNG Committee, NRP Board of Directors, 1201 Louisiana Street, Suite 3400, Houston, Texas 77002.
Independence of Directors
The Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that Messrs. Claro, Gordy, Navarre, Smith and Vecellio
are independent based on all facts and circumstances considered by the Board, including the standards set forth in Section 303A.02(a) of the NYSE’s listing standards. Because we are a limited partnership as defined in Section 303A of the NYSE’s listing standards, we are not required to have a majority of independent directors on the Board. The Board has an Audit Committee, a Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee, and a Conflicts Committee, each of which is staffed solely by independent directors.
Audit Committee
Our Audit Committee is comprised of Mr. Smith, who serves as chairman, Mr. Claro and Mr. Navarre. Mr. Smith and Mr. Navarre are "Audit Committee Financial Experts" as determined pursuant to Item 407 of Regulation S-K. During 2019,
the Audit Committee met seven times.
Report of the Audit Committee
Our Audit Committee is composed entirely of independent directors. The members of the Audit Committee meet the independence and experience requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. The Audit Committee has adopted, and annually reviews, a charter outlining the practices it follows. The charter
complies with all current regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee Charter is available on our website at www.nrplp.com and is available in print upon request.
During 2019, at each of its meetings, the Audit Committee met with the senior members of our financial management team, our general counsel and our independent auditors. The Audit Committee had private sessions at certain of its meetings with our independent auditors and the senior members of our financial management team and the general counsel at which candid discussions of financial management,
accounting and internal control and legal issues took place.
The Audit Committee approved the engagement of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for the year ended December 31, 2019 and reviewed with our financial managers and the independent auditors overall audit scopes and plans, the results of internal and external audit examinations, evaluations by the auditors of our internal controls and the quality of our financial reporting.
Management has reviewed the audited financial statements in the Annual Report with the Audit Committee, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability,
of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant accounting judgments and estimates, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. In addressing the quality of management’s accounting judgments, members of the Audit Committee asked for management’s representations and reviewed certifications prepared by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer that our unaudited quarterly and audited consolidated financial statements fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition and results of operations, and have expressed to both management and auditors their general preference for conservative policies when a range of accounting options is available.
The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(“PCAOB”) and the Commission. The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent accountant required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent accountant the independent accountant’s independence.
In performing all of these functions, the Audit Committee acts only in an oversight capacity. The Audit Committee reviews our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Annual Reports on Form 10-K prior to filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In 2019, the Audit Committee also reviewed quarterly earnings announcements with management and representatives of the independent auditor in advance of their issuance. In its oversight role, the Audit Committee
relies on the work and assurances of our management, which has the primary responsibility for financial statements and reports, and of the independent auditors, who, in their report, express an opinion on the conformity of our annual financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
In reliance on these reviews and discussions, and the report of the independent auditors, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board has approved, that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
| | | | |
| | | Stephen
P. Smith, Chairman | |
| | | Galdino J. Claro | |
| | | Richard A. Navarre | |
Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee
Executive officer compensation is administered by the CNG Committee, which is currently comprised of three members: Mr. Vecellio, as Chairman, Mr. Gordy and Mr. Smith. The CNG Committee has reviewed and approved the compensation arrangements described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. During 2019, the CNG Committee met four times. Our Board of Directors appoints the CNG Committee and delegates to the CNG Committee responsibility for:
| |
• | reviewing
and approving the compensation for our executive officers in light of the time that each executive officer allocates to our business; |
| |
• | reviewing and recommending the annual and long-term incentive plans in which our executive officers participate and approving awards thereunder; and |
| |
• | reviewing and approving compensation for the Board of Directors. |
Our Board of Directors has determined that each CNG Committee member is independent under the listing standards
of the NYSE and the rules of the SEC.
Pursuant to its charter, the CNG Committee is authorized to obtain at NRP’s expense compensation surveys, reports on the design and implementation of compensation programs for directors and executive officers and other data that the CNG Committee considers as appropriate. In addition, the CNG Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any outside counsel or other experts or consultants engaged to assist it in the evaluation of compensation of our directors and executive officers. The CNG Committee Charter is available in print upon request.
Partnership Agreement
Investors may view our partnership agreement and the amendments to the partnership
agreement on our website at www.nrplp.com. The partnership agreement is also filed with the SEC and is available in print to any unitholder that requests them.
Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines. We have also adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our management, and complies with Item 406 of Regulation S-K. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics are available on
our website at www.nrplp.com and are available in print upon request.
NYSE Certification
Pursuant to Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, in 2019, Corbin J. Robertson, Jr. certified to the NYSE that he was not aware of any violation by the Partnership of NYSE corporate governance listing standards.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Overview
As a publicly traded partnership, we have a unique employment and compensation structure that is different from that of a typical public corporation. Our executive officers based in Houston, Texas are employed by Quintana Minerals Corporation (“Quintana”), and our executive officers based in Huntington, West Virginia are employed by Western Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership
(“Western Pocahontas”). Quintana and Western Pocahontas are controlled by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and are affiliates of NRP. While our executive officers are employed by affiliates of NRP, each of them has been appointed to serve as an executive officer of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC (“GP LLC”), the general partner of NRP (GP) LLC (“NRP GP”), the general partner of NRP. For a more detailed description of our structure, see "Items 1. and 2. Business and Properties—Partnership Structure and Management" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Although our executives’ salaries and bonuses are paid directly by the private companies
that employ them, we reimburse those companies based on the time allocated to NRP by each executive officer. Our reimbursement for the compensation of executive officers is governed by our partnership agreement. For purposes of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, our “named executive officers” are:
| |
• | Corbin J. Robertson, Jr.—Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| |
• | Craig W. Nunez—President and Chief Operating Officer |
| |
• | Christopher
J. Zolas—Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| |
• | Kathryn S. Wilson—Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
| |
• | Kevin J. Craig—Executive Vice President, Coal |
Executive Officer Compensation Strategy and Philosophy
Under our partnership agreement, we are required to distribute all of our available cash each quarter.
Historically, our primary business objective was to generate cash flows at levels that could sustain long-term quarterly cash distributions to our investors. However, given the difficult coal markets over the past few years, coupled with the limitations on our ability to access capital from additional sources, our current objective is to preserve long-term equity value for our unitholders by using our excess free cash flow to reduce our leverage. Our objective in determining the compensation of our executive officers is to retain qualified people to manage the business under current market conditions. Incentive compensation for the year ended December 31, 2019 was discretionary but certain performance criteria were considered as factors, as further described under “—Components of Compensation.”
The
2019 compensation for executive officers consisted of four primary components:
| |
• | short-term cash incentive compensation; |
| |
• | long-term equity incentive compensation; and |
| |
• | perquisites
and other benefits. |
To the extent our named executive officers (with the exception of Mr. Robertson) spend time on non-NRP matters, NRP bears only the proportionate cost of their time. Mr. Robertson does not receive a salary in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Robertson is compensated through short-term cash and long-term equity incentive awards, all of which is allocated to NRP.
In February of each year, the CNG Committee approves the short-term cash incentive award for the year just ended and long-term incentive awards for the executive officers. The CNG Committee considers the performance of the partnership, the performance of the individuals and the outlook for the future in determining the amounts of the awards.
Each February, the CNG Committee also makes awards of phantom units to be settled in common units under the Natural Resource Partners 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”) to NRP’s officers in order to incentivize management while also aligning the long-term interests of management with the interests of NRP’s unitholders.
Role of Compensation Experts
In 2019, the CNG Committee engaged Longnecker & Associates (“L&A”) to review our compensation practices for named executive officers and directors relative to our peers. The CNG Committee,
with input from L&A, selected our peer group (the “Peer Group”) after reviewing annual revenue, market capitalization, total enterprise value and total assets of relevant public companies to determine which companies were representative of the marketplace for talent within which we compete. The CNG Committee will review the Peer Group annually to ensure continued appropriateness for comparative purposes. The CNG Committee determined that the companies below reflect an appropriate Peer Group for 2019:
|
| | |
Amplify Energy Corp. | Enviva Partner, LP | Ramaco Resources, Inc. |
Black
Stone Minerals, L.P. | Falcon Minerals Corporation | Rosehill Resources Inc. |
Callon Petroleum Company | Hi-Crush Inc. | SilverBow Resources, Inc. |
CatchMark Timber Trust, Inc. | Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP | SunCoke Energy, Inc. |
Ciner Resources LP | NACCO Industries, Inc. | Talos Energy
Inc. |
CONSOL Coal Resources LP | Panhandle Oil and Gas, Inc. | W&T Offshore, Inc. |
Earthstone Energy, Inc. | Penn Virginia Corporation | |
Using the Peer Group, L&A conducted compensation analyses for all components of compensation and provided the CNG Committee with its findings after such time. The findings indicated that base salaries and short-term incentive compensation of each of the five named executive officers was generally in line with the Peer Group median,
but that long-term incentive compensation was well below the Peer Group median. While L&A provided recommendations for 2019 short-term cash incentive compensation, 2019 base salaries and long-term incentive compensation grants were determined by the CNG Committee prior to engaging L&A. Accordingly, the L&A recommendations will be used prospectively with respect to long-term incentive compensation, with the goal of bringing long-term incentive compensation more in line with the Peer Group over the next few years.
Role of Our Executive Officers in the Compensation Process
With respect to 2019 salaries and short-term cash incentive awards and long-term equity incentive awards, Mr. Nunez, our President and Chief Operating Officer,
provided Mr. Robertson with recommendations relating to the executive officers other than himself. Mr. Robertson considered those recommendations and provided the CNG Committee with recommendations for all of the executive officers other than himself. Messrs. Robertson and Nunez considered the factors described elsewhere in this compensation discussion and analysis in recommending, in their discretion, the appropriate amounts for each named executive officer. Messrs. Robertson and Nunez attended the CNG Committee meetings at which the Committee deliberated and approved 2019 salaries, short-term cash incentive awards and long-term equity incentive awards but were excused from the meetings when the CNG Committee discussed their compensation.
Components of Compensation
Base
Salaries
With the exception of Mr. Robertson, who does not receive a salary for his services as Chief Executive Officer, our executive officers are paid an annual base salary by Quintana or Western Pocahontas for services rendered to us by the executive officers during the fiscal year. We then reimburse Quintana and Western Pocahontas based on the time allocated by each executive officer to our business. The base salaries of our named executive officers are reviewed on an annual basis as well as at the time of a promotion or other material change in responsibilities. The CNG Committee reviews and approves the full salaries paid to each executive officer by Quintana and Western Pocahontas, based on both the actual time allocations to NRP in the prior year and the anticipated time allocations in the coming year. Adjustments in base salary are based on an evaluation of individual
performance, our partnership’s overall performance during the fiscal year and the individual’s contribution to our overall performance.
In determining salaries for NRP’s executive officers for 2019, at the December 2018 meeting, the CNG Committee considered the financial performance of NRP for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 as well as the projected financial
performance of NRP for the fourth quarter of 2018 and for the year ending December 31, 2019. The CNG Committee also considered the individual performance of each member of the executive management team during 2018. Salaries for 2019 are shown in the Summary Compensation Table below.
Short-Term Cash Incentive Compensation
Each named executive officer received a discretionary short-term cash incentive award approved in February 2020 by the CNG Committee. The amounts awarded with respect to 2019 under this program are disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table under the Bonus column. With respect to 2019, the CNG Committee, using recommendations from L&A, determined that cash bonuses would be paid based on a percentage of base salary,
with Mr. Robertson receiving approximately two times the amount awarded to the President and Chief Operating Officer. In addition, the CNG Committee determined that it would consider certain criteria to determine bonus amounts within this range, but that the criteria utilized at the time of determination, as well as the relative weight of those criteria, would be generally discretionary and subject to change based on developments at the company.
Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation
Each named executive officer received a discretionary long-term equity incentive award in 2019 under the 2017 Plan. The 2019 awards were made in the form of phantom units that will settle in NRP common units on a one-for-one
basis following vesting in February 2022 and accrue DERs to be paid in cash upon settlement. We refer to these phantom units issued in 2019 as “2017 Plan Phantom Units.” The 2017 Plan Phantom Units are subject to forfeiture and will vest on an accelerated basis following death or disability of the award recipient or following a change in control of NRP. The grant date fair value of the 2017 Plan Phantom Units awarded in 2019 are disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table under the "Stock Awards" column. For the 2017 Plan Phantom Units awarded in 2019, the CNG Committee generally awarded an amount equal to 135% to 140% of base salary, with Mr. Robertson receiving two times the amount awarded to the President and Chief Operating Officer. The CNG Committee considered performance of the company and individual performance in making these awards.
Perquisites
and Other Personal Benefits
Both Quintana and Western Pocahontas maintain employee benefit plans that provide our executive officers and other employees with the opportunity to enroll in health, dental and life insurance plans. Each of these benefit plans require the employee to pay a portion of the health and dental premiums, with the company paying the remainder. These benefits are offered on the same basis to all employees of Quintana and Western Pocahontas, and the company costs are reimbursed by us to the extent the employee allocates time to our business.
In 2019, Quintana and Western Pocahontas maintained tax-qualified
401(k) plans. During 2019, Quintana and Western Pocahontas matched 100% of the first 6.0% of the employee contributions under their respective 401(k) plans. As with the other contributions, any amounts contributed by Quintana and Western Pocahontas are reimbursed by us based on the time allocated by the employee to our business. None of NRP, Quintana or Western Pocahontas maintains a pension plan or a defined benefit retirement plan.
Unit Ownership Requirements
NRP maintains Unit Ownership and Retention Guidelines (the “ownership guidelines”) that are administered by the CNG Committee and require NRP’s officers who are required to file ownership reports under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and certain other officers as designated
from time-to-time by the Board or the CNG Committee to retain all common units awarded under any NRP incentive plan (net of any units withheld or sold to cover tax liabilities) until certain ownership guidelines are met. The guideline for NRP’s President and Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer is for such individuals to hold common units having a value of three times his or her base salary at the date of measurement. The guideline for NRP’s Executive Vice President—Coal is for such individual to hold common units having a value of two times his or her base salary at the date of measurement. The guideline for NRP’s Vice President & General Counsel and is for such individual to hold common units having a value of one and one-half times his or her base salary at the date of measurement. There is no minimum time period required to achieve the unit ownership guidelines. Due to his substantial ownership in NRP, the ownership guidelines do not currently
apply to our Chief Executive Officer.
The ownership guidelines also require directors who are not officers to retain common units with a value equal to three times the amount of the annual cash retainer paid to directors. Directors are required to achieve the unit ownership guideline within five years. Until the unit ownership guideline is achieved, each director is encouraged to retain all common units awarded under any NRP incentive plan (net of any units
sold to cover tax liabilities).
Units that count towards the satisfaction of the officer and director guidelines include common units held directly by the executive officer or director, common units owned indirectly by the executive officer or director (e.g., by a spouse or other immediate family member residing in the same household or a trust for the benefit of the executive officer or director or his or her family), units granted under NRP’s long-term incentive plans (including phantom units representing the right to receive units), and units purchased in the open market (whether purchased before or after the effective date of the ownership guidelines).
Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy
NRP
maintains the Natural Resource Partners L.P. Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy, which is administered by the CNG Committee. The policy authorizes the Board or committee thereof to recoup incentive compensation in the event of a restatement of financial statements due to material non-compliance with securities laws, fraud or misconduct.
Securities Trading Policy
Our insider trading policy states that executive officers and directors may not purchase or sell puts or calls to sell or buy our common units, engage in short sales with respect to our common units, or buy our securities on margin.
Report of the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee
The CNG Committee has reviewed and discussed
the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management. Based on the reviews and discussions referred to in the foregoing sentence, the CNG Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Leo A. Vecellio, Jr., Chairman
Russell D. Gordy
Stephen P. Smith
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the amounts reimbursed to affiliates of our general partner for compensation for 2017, 2018 and 2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name
and Principal Position | | Year | | Salary ($) | | Bonus ($) | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | | Stock Awards ($) (1) | | All
Other Compensation ($) (2) | | Total ($) |
Corbin J. Robertson, Jr.—Chief Executive Officer |
| | 2019 | | — |
| | 938,868 |
| | — |
| | 1,306,222 |
| | — |
| | 2,245,090 |
|
| | 2018 | | — |
| | 1,208,247 |
| | 250,000 |
| | 418,836 |
| | — |
| | 1,877,083 |
|
| | 2017 | | — |
| | — |
| | 3,250,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,250,000 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Craig
W. Nunez—President and Chief Operating Officer |
| | 2019 | | 500,000 |
| | 408,204 |
| | — |
| | 653,111 |
| | 16,800 |
| | 1,578,115 |
|
| | 2018 | | 447,499 |
| | 604,124 |
| | 93,750 |
| | 209,433 |
| | 16,800 |
| | 1,371,606 |
|
| | 2017 | | 375,000 |
| | 250,000 |
| | 1,218,750 |
| | — |
| | 34,650 |
| | 1,878,400 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Christopher
J. Zolas—Chief Financial Officer |
| | 2019 | | 355,000 |
| | 284,000 |
| | — |
| | 492,581 |
| | 16,800 |
| | 1,148,381 |
|
| | 2018 | | 337,499 |
| | 455,624 |
| | 75,000 |
| | 167,529 |
| | 16,800 |
| | 1,052,452 |
|
| | 2017 | | 300,000 |
| | 180,000 |
| | 375,000 |
| | — |
| | 34,650 |
| | 889,650 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Kathryn
S. Wilson—Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary(3) |
| | 2019 | | 340,271 |
| | 272,217 |
| | — |
| | 507,178 |
| | 16,128 |
| | 1,135,794 |
|
| | 2018 | | 347,499 |
| | 469,124 |
| | 75,000 |
| | 139,622 |
| | 16,800 |
| | 1,048,045 |
|
| | 2017 | | 321,750 |
| | 150,000 |
| | 975,000 |
| | — |
| | 34,304 |
| | 1,481,054 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Kevin
J. Craig—Executive Vice President, Coal(4) |
| | 2019 | | 310,500 |
| | 248,400 |
| | — |
| | 434,854 |
| | 15,120 |
| | 1,008,874 |
|
| | 2018 | | 229,839 |
| | 321,775 |
| | 75,000 |
| | 145,209 |
| | 13,200 |
| | 785,023 |
|
| | 2017 | | 172,000 |
| | 145,600 |
| | 375,000 |
| | — |
| | 22,427 |
| | 715,027 |
|
| |
(2) | Includes portions of 401(k) matching allocated to Natural Resource Partners by Quintana and Western Pocahontas. |
| |
(3) | Ms.
Wilson allocated approximately 99%, 100% and 96% of her time to NRP during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively, and amounts included under the "Salary," "Bonus," and "All Other Compensation" columns reflect this allocation. |
| |
(4) | Mr. Craig allocated approximately 80%, 80% and 90% of his time to NRP during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively, and amounts included under the “Salary,”
“Bonus,” and “All Other Compensation” columns reflect this allocation |
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2019
The following table shows the 2017 Plan Phantom Units granted to named executive officers during 2019. The awards in the table below will vest in February 2022, and upon settlement, an equivalent number of common units will be
issued to each named executive officer, subject to withholding. The 2017 Plan Phantom Units also accrue DERs from the grant date, which will be paid out in cash upon settlement following and subject to vesting.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2017 Plan Phantom Units |
Named Executive Officer | | Grant Date | | Number
of Units | | Grant Date Fair Value |
Corbin J. Robertson, Jr. | | 2/14/2019 | | 31,498 | | $ | 1,306,222 |
|
Craig W. Nunez | | 2/14/2019 | | 15,749 | | 653,111 |
|
Christopher
J. Zolas | | 2/14/2019 | | 11,878 | | 492,581 |
|
Kathryn S. Wilson | | 2/14/2019 | | 12,230 | | 507,178 |
|
Kevin
J. Craig | | 2/14/2019 | | 10,486 | | 434,854 |
|
Employment Agreements
None of our named executive officers have an employment agreement.
Phantom Units Vested in 2019
The table
below shows the cash settled phantom units issued in February 2015 under our previous long-term incentive plan that vested in 2019 (the "Cash Settled Phantom Units") with respect to each named executive officer, along with value realized by each individual:
|
| | | | | | |
Named Executive Officer | | Cash Settled Phantom Units | | Value Realized on Vesting(1) |
Corbin
J. Robertson, Jr. | | 3,600 | | $ | 166,759 |
|
Craig W. Nunez | | 1,400 | | 64,851 |
|
Christopher J. Zolas | | 950 | | 44,006 |
|
Kathryn
S. Wilson | | 950 | | 44,006 |
|
Kevin J. Craig | | 950 | | 44,006 |
|
| |
(1) | Includes
DERs accrued from the issue date to the settlement date. |
The table below shows the total number of outstanding 2017 Plan Phantom Units held by each named executive officer at December 31, 2019. |
| | | | | | |
Named Executive Officer | | Unvested 2017 Plan
Phantom Units(1) | | Market Value of Unvested 2017 Plan Phantom Units(2) |
Corbin J. Robertson, Jr. | | 45,891 | | $ | 922,868 |
|
Craig W. Nunez | | 22,946 | | 461,444 |
|
Christopher
J. Zolas | | 17,635 | | 354,640 |
|
Kathryn S. Wilson | | 17,028 | | 342,433 |
|
Kevin J. Craig | | 15,476 | | 311,222 |
|
| |
(1) | 2017
Plan Phantom Units were awarded in February 2018 and 2019 and vest in February 2021 and 2022, respectively. |
| |
(2) | Based on a unit price of $20.11, the closing price for the common units on December 31, 2019. |
Potential
Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Upon the occurrence of a change in control of NRP, our general partner, or GP Natural Resource Partners LLC, 2017 Plan Phantom Units held by each of our named executive officers would immediately vest and become payable. The table below indicates the estimated payments to each named executive officer following a change in control at December 31, 2019. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2017
Plan Equity Awards | | |
Named Executive Officer | Unvested Phantom Units | | Market Value(2) | | Accumulated DERs | | Total Potential Payments |
Corbin J. Robertson, Jr. | 45,891 | | $ | 922,868 |
| | $ | 126,868 |
| | $ | 1,049,736 |
|
Craig
W. Nunez | 22,946 | | 461,444 |
| | 63,436 |
| | 524,880 |
|
Christopher J. Zolas | 17,635 | | 354,640 |
| | 49,160 |
| | 403,800 |
|
Kathryn
S. Wilson | 17,028 | | 342,433 |
| | 46,098 |
| | 388,531 |
|
Kevin J. Craig | 15,476 | | 311,222 |
| | 43,029 |
| | 354,251 |
|
| |
(1) | Calculated
based on a unit price of $20.11, the closing price for the common units on December 31, 2019. |
For more information regarding the Board and committees thereof, see “Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Managing General Partner and Corporate Governance” elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Director compensation during 2019 consisted of a $75,000 cash retainer and an award of common units under the 2017 Plan. The units awarded to Board members are fully vested and not subject to forfeiture; however, the
Board members had the option in advance of receipt of the award to elect to defer settlement of the award until after 90 days following such director’s retirement or earlier departure from the Board. In addition, members of Board committees received $5,000 for each committee served on, and each committee chairman received an additional $10,000 for acting as chairman.
The table below shows the directors’ compensation for the year ended December 31, 2019: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name
of Director | | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | | 2017 Plan Common Unit Awards(1) | | Total Compensation |
Russell D. Gordy | | $ | 80,000 |
| | $ | 81,074 |
| | $ | 161,074 |
|
Jasvinder
S. Khaira(2) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
S. Reed Morian | | 75,000 |
| | 81,074 |
| | 156,074 |
|
Richard
A. Navarre(3) | | 95,000 |
| | 81,074 |
| | 176,074 |
|
Corbin J. Robertson, III | | 75,000 |
| | 81,074 |
| | 156,074 |
|
Stephen
P. Smith(3) | | 95,000 |
| | 81,074 |
| | 176,074 |
|
Leo A. Vecellio, Jr. | | 95,000 |
| | 81,074 |
| | 176,074 |
|
Paul
B. Murphy, Jr. | | 75,000 |
| | 81,074 |
| | 156,074 |
|
Galdino J. Claro | | 85,000 |
| | 81,074 |
| | 166,074 |
|
Alexander
D. Greene(2) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| |
(1) | Amounts
represent the grant date fair value of phantom unit awards determined in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 determined without regard to forfeitures. For information regarding the assumptions used in calculating these amounts, see Note 17 to the audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
| |
(2) | Mr. Khaira, who was the Blackstone designee pursuant to the Board Representation and Observation Rights Agreement, resigned from the Board effective March 8, 2019. Effective on such date, Mr. Greene was appointed to the Board by Blackstone
to replace Mr. Khaira. Messrs. Khaira and Greene did not receive Board compensation as Blackstone designees. |
| |
(3) | Messrs. Navarre and Smith elected to defer settlement of their common units awarded under the 2017 Plan in 2019 until 90 days following their respective retirements or earlier departures from the Board. |
The
table below shows the Cash Settled Phantom Units that were granted in February 2015 and vested in 2019 with respect to each Director, along with the value realized by each individual, including the DERs accruing from the February 2015 grant date.
|
| | | | | | |
Name of Director | | Cash Settled Phantom Units | | Value Realized on Vesting |
Russell
D. Gordy | | 410 | | $ | 18,992 |
|
Jasvinder S. Khaira | | — | | — |
|
S. Reed Morian | | 410 | | 18,992 |
|
Richard
A. Navarre | | 410 | | 18,992 |
|
Corbin J. Robertson, III | | 410 | | 18,992 |
|
Stephen P. Smith | | 410 | | 18,992 |
|
Leo
A. Vecellio, Jr. | | 410 | | 18,992 |
|
Paul B. Murphy, Jr. | | — | | — |
|
Galdino J. Claro | | — | | — |
|
Alexander
D. Greene | | — | | — |
|
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During the year ended December 31, 2019, Messrs. Vecellio, Gordy, and Smith served on the CNG Committee. None of Messrs. Vecellio, Gordy, and Smith has ever been an officer or employee of NRP or GP Natural Resource Partners LLC. None of our executive officers serve as
a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has any executive officer serving as a member of our Board or CNG Committee.
Pay Ratio Disclosure
The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted a rule requiring annual disclosure of the ratio of the median employee’s total annual compensation to the total annual compensation of the CEO.
The personnel providing services to us, including our executive officers, are employed by Quintana or Western Pocahontas. As of December 31, 2019, 55 such persons were providing services to us. We identified a new median service provider for 2019 by examining the 2019 total taxable
compensation, as reflected in our payroll records as reported to the Internal Revenue Service on Form W-2, for all individuals who provided services to us as of December 31, 2019. We did not make any assumptions, adjustments, or estimates with respect to total cash compensation or equity compensation and we did not annualize the compensation for any service providers that were not employed for all of 2019.
After identifying the median service provider based on total compensation, we calculated annual 2019 compensation for the median service provider using the same methodology used to calculate the Chief Executive Officer’s total compensation as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table above. The median service provider’s annual 2019 compensation was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | | Year | | Salary | | Bonus | | Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation | | Phantom Unit Awards | | All Other Compensation | | Total |
Median Service Provider | | 2019 | | $ | 85,847 |
| | $ | 23,661 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 5,151 |
| | $ | 114,659 |
|
Our
2019 ratio of Chief Executive Officer total compensation to our median service provider's total compensation is reasonably estimated to be 20:1.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The
following tables set forth, as of February 24, 2020, the amount and percentage of our common units and preferred units beneficially held by (1) each person known to us to beneficially own 5% or more of any class of our units, (2) by each of our directors and named executive officers and (3) by all directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise noted, each of the named persons and members of the group has sole voting and investment power with respect to the units shown.
|
| | | | | | |
Name of Beneficial Owner | | Common Units | | Percentage of Common Units
(1) |
Corbin J. Robertson, Jr. (2) | | 2,411,395 |
| | 19.7 | % |
Western Pocahontas Corporation (3) | | 1,739,007 |
| | 14.2 | % |
Western
Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership (4) | | 1,727,986 |
| | 14.1 | % |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (5) | | 1,050,335 |
| | 8.6 | % |
The
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) | | 835,403 |
| | 6.8 | % |
Kevin J. Craig | | 950 |
| | * |
|
Craig
W. Nunez | | — |
| | — |
|
Kathryn S. Wilson | | — |
| | — |
|
Christopher J.
Zolas | | — |
| | — |
|
Galdino J. Claro | | 4,114 |
| | * |
|
Russell D. Gordy
(7) | | 11,354 |
| | * |
|
Alexander D. Greene | | — |
| | — |
|
S.
Reed Morian (8) | | 620,513 |
| | 5.1 | % |
Paul B. Murphy, Jr. | | 7,614 |
| | * |
|
Richard
A. Navarre | | 1,000 |
| | * |
|
Corbin J. Robertson III (9) | | 238,656 |
| | 1.9 | % |
Stephen
P. Smith (10) | | 355 |
| | * |
|
Leo A. Vecellio, Jr. | | 6,354 |
| | * |
|
Directors
and Officers as a Group | | 3,302,305 |
| | 26.9 | % |
| |
(1) | Percentages based upon 12,261,199 common units issued and outstanding as of February 24, 2020. Unless otherwise noted, beneficial ownership is less than 1%. |
| |
(2) | Mr. Robertson may be deemed to beneficially own 505,861 common units owned in his individual capacity, 1,739,007 common units in his capacity as controlling shareholder of Western Pocahontas Corporation, 156,000 common units in his
capacity as the sole member of Robertson Coal Management LLC, which is the sole member of GP Natural Resource Partners, which is the general partner of NRP (GP) LP, 5,293 common units in his capacity as controlling shareholder of GNP Management Corporation and 5,234 common units held by his spouse, Barbara M. Robertson. Mr. Robertson’s address is 1415 Louisiana Street, Suite 2400, Houston, Texas 77002. |
| |
(3) | Western
Pocahontas Corporation has sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to 11,021 common units and shared voting and shared dispositive power with respect to 1,727,986 common units in its capacity as the general partner of Western Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership. The business address of Western Pocahontas Corporation is 5260 Irwin Road, Huntington, West Virginia 25705. |
| |
(4) | Western Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership has sole voting and sole dispositive
power with respect to 0 common units and shared voting and shared dispositive power with respect to 1,727,986 common units. The business address of Western Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership is 5260 Irwin Road, Huntington, West Virginia 25705. |
| |
(5) | According
to a Schedule 13G filing with the SEC on January 31, 2020, JPMorgan Chase & Co. holds sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 1,050,335 common units in the Partnership. The business address of JPMorgan Chase & Co. is 270 Park Ave., New York, NY 10017. |
| |
(6) | According to a Schedule13G filing with the SEC on January
31, 2020, The Goldman Sachs Group holds shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 835,403 common units in the Partnership. The business address of The Goldman Sachs Group is 200 West Street, New York, NY 10282. |
| |
(7) | Mr. Gordy may be deemed to beneficially own 5,000 common units owned by Minion Trail, Ltd. and 2,000 common units owned by Rock Creek Ranch 1, Ltd. |
| |
(8) | Mr.
Morian may be deemed to beneficially own 344,863 common units owned by Shadder Investments and 60,097 common units owned by Mocol Properties. |
| |
(9) | Mr. Robertson III may be deemed to beneficially own 9,783 common units held CIII Capital Management, LLC, 10,000 common units held by BHJ Investments, 19,663 common units held by The Corbin James Robertson III 2009 Family Trust and 39 common units held by his spouse, Brooke Robertson. The address for CIII Capital Management, LLC is 1415 Louisiana Street, Suite 2400, Houston, Texas 77002,
the address for BHJ Investments is 1415 Louisiana Street, Suite 2400, Houston, Texas 77002 and the address for The Corbin James Robertson III 2009 Family Trust is 1415 Louisiana Street, Suite 2400, Houston, Texas 77002. The following common units are pledged as collateral for loans: 51,987 common units owned by Mr. Robertson III. |
| |
(10) | Mr.
Smith may be deemed to beneficially own 355 common units owned by the SP Smith 2002 Revocable Trust. |
|
| | | | | | |
Name of Beneficial Owner | | Preferred Units | | Percentage of Preferred Units |
The Blackstone Group Inc. (1) | | 142,500 |
| | 57 | % |
GoldenTree
Asset Management, LP (2) | | 107,500 |
| | 43 | % |
| |
(1) | The
preferred units are owned by funds managed by The Blackstone Group Inc., whose address is 345 Park Ave, New York, NY 10154. The Blackstone Group Inc. is controlled by its founder, Stephen A. Schwarzman. |
| |
(2) | The preferred units are owned by funds managed by GoldenTree Asset Management, LP, whose address is 300 Park Ave, New York, NY
10022. Steven A. Tananbaum serves as senior managing member of GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, the general partner of GoldenTree Asset Management, LP. |
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Western
Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership, New Gauley Coal Corporation, and Great Northern Properties Limited Partnership are three privately held companies that are primarily engaged in owning and managing mineral properties. We refer to these companies collectively as the WPP Group. Corbin J. Robertson, Jr. owns the general partner of Western Pocahontas Properties, 85% of the general partner of Great Northern Properties Limited Partnership and is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of New Gauley Coal Corporation.
Omnibus Agreement
As part of the omnibus agreement entered into concurrently with the closing of our initial public offering, the WPP Group and any entity controlled by Corbin J. Robertson, Jr., which we refer to in this section as the “GP affiliates,” each agreed
that neither they nor their affiliates will, directly or indirectly, engage or invest in entities that engage in the following activities (each, a "restricted business") in the specific circumstances described below:
| |
• | the entering into or holding of leases with a party other than an affiliate of the GP affiliate for any GP affiliate-owned fee coal reserves within the United States; and |
| |
• | the entering into or holding of subleases with a party other than an affiliate of the GP affiliate for coal reserves within the United States controlled
by a paid-up lease owned by any GP affiliate or its affiliate. |
"Affiliate" means, with respect to any GP affiliate or, any other entity in which such GP affiliate owns, through one or more intermediaries, 50% or more of the then outstanding voting securities or other ownership interests of such entity. Except as described below, the WPP Group and their respective controlled affiliates will not be prohibited from engaging in activities in which they compete directly with us.
A GP affiliate may, directly or indirectly, engage in a restricted business if:
| |
• | the
GP affiliate was engaged in the restricted business at the closing of the offering; provided that if the fair market value of the asset or group of related assets of the restricted business subsequently exceeds $10 million, the GP affiliate must offer the restricted business to us under the offer procedures described below. |
| |
• | the asset or group of related assets of the restricted business have a fair market value of $10 million or less; provided that if the fair market value of the assets of the restricted business subsequently exceeds $10 million, the GP affiliate must offer the restricted business to us under the offer procedures described below. |
| |
• | the
asset or group of related assets of the restricted business have a fair market value of more than $10 million and the general partner (with the approval of the conflicts committee) has elected not to cause us to purchase these assets under the procedures described below. |
| |
• | its ownership in the restricted business consists solely of a non-controlling equity interest. |
For purposes of this paragraph, "fair market value" means the fair market value as determined in good faith by the relevant GP affiliate.
The total fair market value in the
good faith opinion of the WPP Group of all restricted businesses engaged in by the WPP Group, other than those engaged in by the WPP Group at closing of our initial public offering, may not exceed $75 million. For purposes of this restriction, the fair market value of any entity engaging in a restricted business purchased by the WPP Group will be determined based on the fair market value of the entity as a whole, without regard for any lesser ownership interest to be acquired.
If the WPP Group desires to acquire a restricted business or an entity that engages in a restricted business with a fair market value in excess of $10 million and the restricted business constitutes greater than 50% of the value of the business to be acquired, then the WPP Group must first offer us the opportunity to purchase the restricted business. If the WPP Group desires to acquire a restricted business
or an entity that engages in a restricted business with a value in excess of $10 million and the restricted business constitutes 50% or less of the value of the business to be acquired, then the GP affiliate may purchase the restricted business first and then offer us the opportunity to purchase the restricted business within six months of acquisition. For purposes of this paragraph, "restricted business" excludes a general partner interest or managing member interest, which is addressed in a separate restriction summarized below. For purposes of this paragraph only, "fair market value" means the fair market value as determined in good
faith
by the relevant GP affiliate.
If we want to purchase the restricted business and the GP affiliate and the general partner, with the approval of the conflicts committee, agree on the fair market value and other terms of the offer within 60 days after the general partner receives the offer from the GP affiliate, we will purchase the restricted business as soon as commercially practicable. If the GP affiliate and the general partner, with the approval of the conflicts committee, are unable to agree in good faith on the fair market value and other terms of the offer within 60 days after the general partner receives the offer, then the GP affiliate may sell the restricted business to a third party within two years for no less than the purchase price and on terms no less favorable to the GP affiliate than last offered by us. During this two-year period, the GP affiliate may operate
the restricted business in competition with us, subject to the restriction on total fair market value of restricted businesses owned in the case of the WPP Group.
If, at the end of the two year period, the restricted business has not been sold to a third party and the restricted business retains a value, in the good faith opinion of the relevant GP affiliate, in excess of $10 million, then the GP affiliate must reoffer the restricted business to the general partner. If the GP affiliate and the general partner, with the approval of the conflicts committee, agree on the fair market value and other terms of the offer within 60 days after the general partner receives the second offer from the GP affiliate, we will purchase the restricted business as soon as commercially practicable. If the GP Affiliate and the general partner, with the concurrence of the conflicts committee, again
fail to agree after negotiation in good faith on the fair market value of the restricted business, then the GP affiliate will be under no further obligation to us with respect to the restricted business, subject to the restriction on total fair market value of restricted businesses owned.
In addition, if during the two-year period described above, a change occurs in the restricted business that, in the good faith opinion of the GP affiliate, affects the fair market value of the restricted business by more than 10 percent and the fair market value of the restricted business remains, in the good faith opinion of the relevant GP affiliate, in excess of $10 million, the GP affiliate will be obligated to reoffer the restricted business to the general partner at the new fair market value, and the offer procedures described above will recommence.
If
the restricted business to be acquired is in the form of a general partner interest in a publicly held partnership or a managing member interest in a publicly held limited liability company, the WPP Group may not acquire such restricted business even if we decline to purchase the restricted business. If the restricted business to be acquired is in the form of a general partner interest in a non-publicly held partnership or a managing member of a non-publicly held limited liability company, the WPP Group may acquire such restricted business subject to the restriction on total fair market value of restricted businesses owned and the offer procedures described above.
The omnibus agreement may be amended at any time by the general partner, with the concurrence of the conflicts committee. The respective obligations of the WPP Group under the omnibus agreement terminate when the WPP
Group and its affiliates cease to participate in the control of the general partner.
Effective on March 2, 2017 in connection with the closing of the issuance of the Preferred Units, we entered into the Board Observation and Representation Rights Agreement (the “Board Rights Agreement”) with Blackstone and GoldenTree. Pursuant to the Board Rights
Agreement, Blackstone appoints one member to serve on the Board of Directors of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC and also appoints one observer to attend meetings of the Board. Blackstone's rights to appoint a member of the Board and an observer will terminate at such time as Blackstone, together with their affiliates, no longer own at least 20% of the total number of Preferred Units issued on the closing date, together with all PIK Units that have been issued but not redeemed (the "Minimum Preferred Unit Threshold"). Following the time that Blackstone (and their affiliates) no longer own the Minimum Preferred Unit Threshold and until such time as GoldenTree (together with their affiliates) no longer own the Minimum Preferred Unit Threshold, GoldenTree shall have the one-time option to appoint either one person to serve as a member of the Board or one person to serve as a
Board observer. To the extent GoldenTree elects to appoint a Board member and later remove such Board member, GoldenTree may then elect to appoint a Board observer. For more information on the Preferred Units, including the rights of the holders thereof, see "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 5. Class A Convertible Preferred Units and Warrants" elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Quintana
Capital Group GP, Ltd.
Corbin J. Robertson, Jr. is a principal in Quintana Capital Group GP, Ltd., which controls several private equity funds focused on investments in the energy business. NRP’s Board of Directors has adopted a formal conflicts policy that establishes the opportunities that will be pursued by NRP and those that will be pursued by Quintana Capital. The basic tenets of the policy are set forth below.
NRP’s business strategy has historically focused on:
| |
• | The ownership of natural resource properties in North America, including, but not limited to coal, aggregates
and industrial minerals, and oil and gas. NRP leases these properties to mining or operating companies that mine or produce the resources and pay NRP a royalty. |
| |
• | The ownership and operation of transportation, storage and related logistics activities related to extracted hard minerals. |
The businesses and investments described in this paragraph are referred to as the "NRP Businesses."
NRP’s acquisition strategy also includes:
| |
• | The
ownership of non-operating working interests in oil and gas properties. |
| |
• | The ownership of non-controlling equity interests in companies involved in natural resource development and extraction. |
| |
• | The operation of construction aggregates mining and production businesses. |
The businesses and investments described in this paragraph are referred to as the "Shared Businesses."
NRP’s
business strategy does not, and is not expected to, include:
| |
• | The ownership of equity interests in companies involved in the mining or extraction of coal. |
| |
• | Investments that do not generate "qualifying income" for a publicly traded partnership under U.S. tax regulations. |
| |
• | Investments outside of North America. |
| |
• | Midstream
or refining businesses that do not involve hard extracted minerals, including the gathering, processing, fractionation, refining, storage or transportation of oil, natural gas or natural gas liquids. |
The businesses and investments described in this paragraph are referred to as the "Non-NRP Businesses."
It is acknowledged that neither Quintana Capital nor Mr. Robertson will have any obligation to offer investments relating to Non-NRP Businesses to NRP, and that NRP will not have any obligation to refrain from pursuing a Non-NRP Business if there is a change in its business strategy.
For so long as Corbin Robertson, Jr. remains both an affiliate of Quintana Capital and an
executive officer or director of NRP or an affiliate of its general partner, before making an investment in an NRP Business, Quintana Capital has agreed to adhere to the following procedures:
| |
• | Quintana Capital will first offer such opportunity in its entirety to NRP. NRP may elect to pursue such investment wholly for its own account, to pursue the opportunity jointly with Quintana Capital or not to pursue such opportunity. |
| |
• | If NRP elects not to pursue an NRP Business investment opportunity, Quintana Capital may pursue the investment
for its own account on similar terms. |
| |
• | NRP will undertake to advise Quintana Capital of its decision regarding a potential investment opportunity within 10 business days of the identification of such opportunity to the Conflicts Committee. |
If the opportunity relates to the acquisition of a Shared Business, NRP and Quintana Capital will adhere to the following procedures:
| |
• | If the opportunity is generated by individuals other than
Mr. Robertson, the opportunity will belong to the entity for which those individuals are working. |
| |
• | If the opportunity is generated by Mr. Robertson and both NRP and Quintana Capital are interested in pursuing the opportunity, it is expected that the Conflicts Committee will work together with the relevant Limited Partner
Advisory Committees for Quintana Capital to reach an equitable resolution of the conflict, which may involve investments by both parties. |
In all cases above in which Mr. Robertson has a conflict of interest, investment decisions will be made on behalf of NRP by the Conflicts Committee and on behalf of Quintana Capital Group by the relevant Investment Committee, with Mr. Robertson abstaining.
Relationships with Entities Associated with Corbin J. Robertson, III
Quinwood Coal Partners LP (“Quinwood”), an entity controlled by Corbin J. Robertson, III (one of our directors) leases two coal properties from us in Central Appalachia. During the year ended December
31, 2019, we recorded $0.2 million in coal royalty revenues from Quinwood and received $0.2 million in cash related to royalty and property tax payments.
Mr. Robertson III also owns a minority ownership interest in Industrial Minerals Group LLC (“Industrial Minerals”), which, through its subsidiaries, leases two of NRP’s coal royalty properties in Central Appalachia. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded $1.7 million in coal royalty and wheelage revenues from Industrial Minerals and received approximately $0.5 million in cash related to royalty and minimum payments.
Office
Building in Huntington, West Virginia
We lease an office building in Huntington, West Virginia from Western Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership. The initial 10-year term of the lease expired at the end of 2018. On January 1, 2019 we entered into a new lease on the building for a five-year base term, with five additional five-year renewal options. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we paid approximately $0.8 million to Western Pocahontas under the lease. Relationship with Cadence Bank, N.A.
Paul B. Murphy, Jr. one of the members of the Board of Directors of GP
Natural Resource Partners LLC, is the Chairman of Cadence Bank, N.A., which is a lender under NRP Operating’s revolving credit facility and has received customary fees and interest payments in connection therewith. During the year ended December 31, 2019 we paid approximately $0.1 million in interest and fees under the credit facility to Cadence Bank, N.A.
Conflicts of Interest
Conflicts of interest exist and may arise in the future as a result of the relationships between our general partner and its affiliates (including the WPP Group) on the one hand, and our partnership and our limited partners, on the other hand. The directors and officers of GP Natural
Resource Partners LLC have duties to manage GP Natural Resource Partners LLC and our general partner in a manner beneficial to its owners. At the same time, our general partner has a duty to manage our partnership in a manner beneficial to us and our unitholders. The Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, which we refer to as the Delaware Act, provides that Delaware limited partnerships may, in their partnership agreements, expand, restrict or eliminate the fiduciary duties otherwise owed by a general partner to limited partners and the partnership. Pursuant to these provisions, our partnership agreement contains various provisions modifying the fiduciary duties that would otherwise be owed by our general partner with contractual standards governing the duties of the general partner and the methods of resolving conflicts of interest. Our partnership agreement also specifically
defines the remedies available to limited partners for actions taken that, without these defined liability standards, might constitute breaches of fiduciary duty under applicable Delaware law.
Whenever a conflict arises between our general partner or its affiliates, on the one hand, and our partnership or any other partner, on the other, our general partner will resolve that conflict. Our general partner may, but is not required to, seek the approval of the conflicts committee of the Board of Directors of our general partner of such resolution. The partnership agreement contains provisions that allow our general partner to take into account the interests of other parties in addition to our interests when resolving conflicts of interest.
Our general partner will not be in breach of its obligations under the partnership agreement or its duties to us or our unitholders if the resolution of the conflict is considered to be fair and reasonable to us. Any resolution is considered to be fair and reasonable to us if that resolution is:
| |
• | approved by the conflicts committee, although our general partner is not obligated to seek such approval and our general partner may adopt a resolution or course of action that has not received approval; |
| |
• | on
terms no less favorable to us than those generally being provided to or available from unrelated third parties; or |
| |
• | fair to us, taking into account the totality of the relationships between the parties involved, including other transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous to us. |
In resolving a conflict, our general partner, including its conflicts committee, may, unless the resolution is specifically provided for in the partnership agreement, consider:
| |
• | the
relative interests of any party to such conflict and the benefits and burdens relating to such interest; |
| |
• | any customary or accepted industry practices or historical dealings with a particular person or entity; |
| |
• | generally accepted accounting practices or principles; and |
| |
• | such additional factors
it determines in its sole discretion to be relevant, reasonable or appropriate under the circumstances. |
Blackstone has certain consent rights and board appointment and observation rights and may be deemed to be an affiliate of our general partner. In addition, GoldenTree has certain limited consent rights. In the exercise of these consent rights and board rights, conflicts of interest could arise between us on the one hand, and Blackstone or GoldenTree on the other hand.
Conflicts of interest could arise in the situations described below, among others.
Actions taken by our general partner may affect the amount of cash available for distribution to unitholders.
The
amount of cash that is available for distribution to unitholders is affected by decisions of our general partner regarding such matters as:
| |
• | amount and timing of asset purchases and sales; |
| |
• | the
issuance of additional common units; and |
| |
• | the creation, reduction or increase of reserves in any quarter. |
In addition, borrowings by us and our affiliates do not constitute a breach of any duty owed by our general partner to the unitholders, including borrowings that have the purpose or effect of enabling our general partner to receive distributions.
For example, in the event we have not generated sufficient cash from our operations to pay the quarterly distribution on our common units, our partnership agreement permits us to borrow funds which
may enable us to make this distribution on all outstanding common units.
The partnership agreement provides that we and our subsidiaries may borrow funds from our general partner and its affiliates. Our general partner and its affiliates may not borrow funds from us or our subsidiaries.
We
do not have any officers or employees. We rely on officers and employees of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC and its affiliates.
We do not have any officers or employees and rely on officers and employees of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC and its affiliates. Affiliates of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC conduct businesses and activities of their own in which we have no economic interest. If these separate activities are significantly greater than our activities, there could be material competition for the time and effort of the officers and employees who provide services to our general partner. The officers of GP
Natural Resource Partners LLC are not required to work full time on our affairs. Certain of these officers devote significant time to the affairs of the WPP Group or its affiliates and are compensated by these affiliates for the services rendered to them.
We reimburse our general partner and its affiliates for expenses.
We reimburse our general partner and its affiliates for costs incurred in managing and operating us, including costs incurred in rendering corporate staff and support services to us. The partnership agreement provides that our general partner determines the expenses that are allocable to us in any reasonable manner determined by our general partner in its sole discretion.
Our
general partner intends to limit its liability regarding our obligations.
Our general partner intends to limit its liability under contractual arrangements so that the other party has recourse only to our assets, and not against our general partner or its assets. The partnership agreement provides that any action taken by our general partner to limit its liability or our liability is not a breach of our general partner’s fiduciary duties, even if we could have obtained more favorable terms without the limitation on liability.
Common unitholders have no right to enforce obligations of our general partner and its affiliates under agreements with us.
Any agreements between us on the one hand, and
our general partner and its affiliates, on the other, do not grant to the unitholders, separate and apart from us, the right to enforce the obligations of our general partner and its affiliates in our favor.
Contracts between us, on the one hand, and our general partner and its affiliates, on the other, are not the result of arm’s-length negotiations.
The partnership agreement allows our general partner to pay itself or its affiliates for any services rendered to us, provided these services are rendered on terms that are fair and reasonable. Our general partner may also enter into additional contractual arrangements with any of its affiliates on our behalf. Neither the partnership agreement nor
any of the other agreements, contracts and arrangements between us, on the one hand, and our general partner and its affiliates, on the other, are the result of arm’s-length negotiations.
All of these transactions entered into after our initial public offerings are on terms that are fair and reasonable to us.
Our general partner and its affiliates have no obligation to permit us to use any facilities or assets of our general partner and its affiliates, except as may be provided in contracts entered into specifically dealing with that use. There is no obligation of our general partner or its affiliates to
enter into any contracts of this kind.
We may not choose to retain separate counsel for ourselves or for the holders of common units.
The attorneys, independent auditors and others who have performed services for us in the past were retained by our general partner, its affiliates and us and have continued to be retained by our general partner, its affiliates and us. Attorneys, independent auditors and others who perform services for us are selected by our general partner or the conflicts committee and may also perform services for our general partner and its affiliates. We may retain separate counsel for ourselves or the holders of common units in the event of a conflict of interest arising between
our general partner and its affiliates, on the one hand, and us or the holders of common units, on the other, depending on the nature of the conflict. We do not intend to do so in most cases. Delaware case law has not definitively established the limits on the ability of a partnership agreement to restrict such fiduciary duties.
Our general partner’s affiliates may compete with us.
The
partnership agreement provides that our general partner is restricted from engaging in any business activities other than those incidental to its ownership of interests in us. Except as provided in our partnership agreement and the Omnibus Agreement, affiliates of our general partner will not be prohibited from engaging in activities in which they compete directly with us.
The Conflicts Committee Charter is available upon request.
Director Independence
Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons
If a conflict or potential conflict of interest arises between our general partner and its affiliates (including the WPP Group) on the one hand, and our partnership and our limited partners, on the other hand, the resolution of any such conflict or potential conflict is addressed as described under "—Conflicts of Interest."
Pursuant to our Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics, conflicts of interest are prohibited as a matter of policy, except under guidelines approved by the Board and as provided in the Omnibus Agreement and our partnership agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2019 there were no transactions where such guidelines were not followed.
ITEM
14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC recommended and we engaged Ernst & Young LLP to audit our accounts and assist with tax work for fiscal 2019 and 2018. All of our audit, audit-related fees and tax services have been approved by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by Ernst &Young LLP: |
| | | | | | | |
| 2019 | | 2018 |
Audit
Fees (1) | $ | 1,070,206 |
| | $ | 957,272 |
|
Tax Fees (2) | 533,083 |
| | 501,426 |
|
| |
(1) | Audit
fees include fees associated with the annual integrated audit of our consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting, separate audits of subsidiaries and reviews of our quarterly financial statement for inclusion in our Form 10-Q and comfort letters; consents; work related to acquisitions; assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC. |
| |
(2) | Tax fees include fees principally incurred for assistance with tax planning, compliance, tax return preparation and filing of Schedules K-1. |
Audit and Non-Audit Services
Pre-Approval Policy
I. Statement of Principles
Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Act"), the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of the independent auditor. As part of this responsibility, the Audit Committee is required to pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditor in order to assure that they do not impair the auditor’s independence from the Partnership. To implement these provisions of the Act, the SEC has issued rules specifying the types of services that an independent auditor may not provide to its audit client, as well as the audit committee’s administration of the engagement of the independent auditor. Accordingly, the Audit Committee has adopted,
and the Board of Directors has ratified, this Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy (the "Policy"), which sets forth the procedures and the conditions pursuant to which services proposed to be performed by the independent auditor may be pre-approved.
The SEC’s rules establish two different approaches to pre-approving services, which the SEC considers to be equally valid. Proposed services may either be pre-approved without consideration of specific case-by-case services by the Audit Committee ("general pre-approval") or require the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee ("specific pre-approval"). The Audit Committee believes that the combination of these two approaches in this Policy will result in an effective and efficient procedure to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditor. As set forth in this Policy, unless a type
of service has received general pre-approval, it will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee if it is to be provided by the independent auditor. Any proposed services exceeding pre-approved cost levels or budgeted amounts will also require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.
For both types of pre-approval, the Audit Committee will consider whether such services are consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence. The Audit Committee will also consider whether the independent auditor is best positioned to provide the most effective and efficient service for reasons such as its familiarity with our business, employees, culture, accounting systems, risk profile and other factors, and whether the service might enhance the Partnership’s ability to manage or control risk or improve audit quality. All such factors will be considered as a whole, and no
one factor will necessarily be determinative.
The Audit Committee is also mindful of the relationship between fees for audit and non-audit services in deciding whether to pre-approve any such services and may determine, for each fiscal year, the appropriate ratio between the total amount of fees for audit, audit-related and tax services.
The appendices to this Policy describe the audit, audit-related and tax services that have the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The term of any general pre-approval is 12 months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee considers a different period and states otherwise. The Audit Committee will annually review and pre-approve the services that may be provided by the independent auditor without obtaining specific pre-approval
from the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will add or subtract to the list of general pre-approved services from time to time, based on subsequent determinations.
The purpose of this Policy is to set forth the procedures by which the Audit Committee intends to fulfill its responsibilities. It does not delegate the Audit Committee’s responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditor to management.
Ernst &
Young LLP, our independent auditor has reviewed this Policy and believes that implementation of the policy will not adversely affect its independence.
II. Delegation
As provided in the Act and the SEC’s rules, the Audit Committee has delegated either type of pre-approval authority to Stephen P. Smith, the Chairman of the Audit Committee. Mr. Smith must report, for informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
III. Audit Services
The annual Audit services engagement terms and fees will be subject to the specific pre-approval of the Audit
Committee. Audit services include the annual financial statement audit (including required quarterly reviews), subsidiary audits and other procedures required to be performed by the independent auditor to be able to form an opinion on the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements. These other procedures include information systems and procedural reviews and testing performed in order to understand and place reliance on the systems of internal control, and consultations relating to the audit or quarterly review. Audit services also include the attestation engagement for the independent auditor’s report on internal controls for financial reporting. The Audit Committee monitors the audit services engagement as necessary, but not less than on a quarterly basis, and approves, if necessary, any changes in terms, conditions and fees resulting from changes in audit scope, partnership structure or other items.
In
addition to the annual audit services engagement approved by the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee may grant general pre-approval to other audit services, which are those services that only the independent auditor reasonably can provide. Other audit services may include statutory audits or financial audits for our subsidiaries or our affiliates and services associated with SEC registration statements, periodic reports and other documents filed with the SEC or other documents issued in connection with securities offerings.
IV. Audit-related Services
Audit-related services are assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Partnership’s
financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the independent auditor. Because the Audit Committee believes that the provision of audit-related services does not impair the independence of the auditor and is consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence, the Audit Committee may grant general pre-approval to audit-related services. Audit-related services include, among others, due diligence services pertaining to potential business acquisitions/dispositions; accounting consultations related to accounting, financial reporting or disclosure matters not classified as "Audit Services"; assistance with understanding and implementing new accounting and financial reporting guidance from rulemaking authorities; financial audits of employee benefit plans; agreed-upon or expanded audit procedures related to accounting and/or billing records required to respond to or comply with financial, accounting or regulatory reporting matters; and assistance
with internal control reporting requirements.
V. Tax Services
The Audit Committee believes that the independent auditor can provide tax services to the Partnership such as tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice without impairing the auditor’s independence, and the SEC has stated that the independent auditor may provide such services. Hence, the Audit Committee believes it may grant general pre-approval to those tax services that have historically been provided by the auditor, that the Audit Committee has reviewed and believes would not impair the independence of the auditor and that are consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence. The Audit Committee will not permit the retention of the independent auditor in connection with a transaction initially recommended by the
independent auditor, the sole business purpose of which may be tax avoidance and the tax treatment of which may not be supported in the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations. The Audit Committee will consult with the Chief Financial Officer or outside counsel to determine that the tax planning and reporting positions are consistent with this Policy.
VI. Pre-Approval Fee Levels or Budgeted Amounts
Pre-approval
fee levels or budgeted amounts for all services to be provided by the independent auditor will be established annually by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services exceeding these levels or amounts will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is mindful of the overall relationship of fees for audit and non-audit services in determining whether to pre-approve any such services. For each fiscal year, the Audit Committee may determine the appropriate ratio between the total amount of fees for audit, audit-related and tax services.
VII. Procedures
All requests or applications for services to be provided by the independent auditor that do not require specific approval by the Audit Committee will be submitted to the Chief Financial Officer and must include
a detailed description of the services to be rendered. The Chief Financial Officer will determine whether such services are included within the list of services that have received the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will be informed on a timely basis of any such services rendered by the independent auditor.
Requests or applications to provide services that require specific approval by the Audit Committee will be submitted to the Audit Committee by both the independent auditor and the Chief Financial Officer, and must include a joint statement as to whether, in their view, the request or application is consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)(1) and (2) Financial Statements and Schedules
(a)(3)
Ciner Wyoming LLC Financial Statements
The financial statements of Ciner Wyoming LLC required pursuant to Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X are included in this filing as Exhibit 99.1.
(a)(4) Exhibits
|
| |
Exhibit Number | Description |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2015, by and among NRP (Operating) LLC, the lenders party thereto, Citibank, N.A. as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities LLC as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners, and Citibank, N.A., as Syndication Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 18, 2015). |
| First
Amendment, dated as of June 3, 2016, to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2015, by and among NRP (Operating) LLC, the lenders party thereto, Citibank, N.A. as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities LLC as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners, and Citibank, N.A., as Syndication Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 7, 2016). |
| First Amended and Restated Omnibus Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2009, by and among Western
Pocahontas Properties Limited Partnership, Great Northern Properties Limited Partnership, New Gauley Coal Corporation, Robertson Coal Management LLC, GP Natural Resource Partners LLC, NRP (GP) LP, Natural Resource Partners L.P. and NRP (Operating) LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 7, 2009). |
| |
| |
|
| |
Exhibit Number | Description |
| Second
Amendment, dated as of March 2, 2017, to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2015, by and among NRP (Operating) LLC, the lenders party thereto, Citibank, N.A. as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities LLC as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners, and Citibank, N.A., as Syndication Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 6, 2017). |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
101.INS* | XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document |
101.PRE* | XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
| |
* | |
** | Furnished herewith |
+ | Management compensatory plan or arrangement |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | |
| NATURAL
RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P. |
| By: | | NRP (GP) LP, its general partner |
| By: | | |
| | | PARTNERS
LLC, its general partner |
| | | |
| | |
| By: | | /s/ CORBIN J. ROBERTSON, JR. |
| | | Corbin
J. Robertson, Jr. |
| | | Chairman of the Board, Director and |
| | | Chief Executive Officer |
| | | (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
| | | |
| | |
| By: | | /s/ CHRISTOPHER J. ZOLAS |
| | | Christopher J. Zolas |
| | | Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| | | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has
been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
| |
| |
| /s/ GALDINO J. CLARO |
| Galdino J. Claro |
| Director |
|
| |
| |
| /s/ RUSSELL D. GORDY |
| Russell D. Gordy |
| Director |
|
| |
| |
| /s/
ALEXANDER D. GREENE |
| Alexander D. Greene |
| Director |
|
| |
| |
| /s/ S. REED MORIAN |
| S.
Reed Morian |
| Director |
|
| |
| |
| /s/ PAUL B. MURPHY, JR. |
| Paul B. Murphy, Jr. |
| Director |
|
| |
| |
| /s/ RICHARD A. NAVARRE |
| Richard A. Navarre |
| Director |
|
| |
| |
| /s/
CORBIN J. ROBERTSON III |
| Corbin J. Robertson III |
| Director |
|
| |
| |
| /s/ STEPHEN P. SMITH |
| Stephen
P. Smith |
| Director |
|
| |
| |
| /s/ LEO A. VECELLIO, JR. |
| Leo A. Vecellio, Jr. |
| Director |
