SEC Info℠ | Home | Search | My Interests | Help | Sign In | Please Sign In | ||||||||||||||||||||
As Of Filer Filing For·On·As Docs:Size Issuer Agent 7/25/08 Satyam Computer Services Ltd 6-K 6/30/08 8:2.9M RR DONN… FundSuiteArc/FA |
Document/Exhibit Description Pages Size 1: 6-K Satyam Computer Services Limited HTML 285K 2: EX-99.1 EX-99.1 Press Release of the Company, Dated July HTML 29K 18, 2008, Concerning Financial Results 3: EX-99.2 EX-99.2 Summary of Financial Results of the HTML 124K Company, Dated July 18, 2008. 4: EX-99.3 EX-99.3 Investor Link News Update of the Company HTML 175K Dated July 18, 2008. 5: EX-99.4 EX-99.4 Unconsolidated/Standalone Financial HTML 414K Statements for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2008 as Per Indian Gaap (Audited). 6: EX-99.5 EX-99.5 Consolidated Financial Statements for the HTML 420K Quater Ended June 30, 2008 as Per Indian Gaap (Unaudited). 7: EX-99.6 EX-99.6 Consolidated Financial Statements for the HTML 629K Quarter Ended June 30, 2008 as Per Ifrs (Unaudited). 8: EX-99.7 EX-99.7 Consolidated Financial Statements for the HTML 376K Quarter Ended June 30, 2008 as Per Us Gaap (Unaudited).
EX-99.6 Consolidated FS under IFRS (audited). |
Index | ||||
1 | ||||
2 | ||||
3 | ||||
5 | ||||
6 |
As at June 30, | As at June 30, | As at March 31, | ||||||||||||
Note | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | |||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | (audited) | ||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||
Non-current assets |
||||||||||||||
Premises and equipment |
6 | 230.2 | 169.9 | 219.7 | ||||||||||
Intangible assets |
7 | 68.9 | 43.1 | 47.5 | ||||||||||
Investments in joint ventures |
8.2 | 5.0 | 4.8 | 4.9 | ||||||||||
Investments in bank deposits |
0.1 | 844.0 | — | |||||||||||
Deferred income tax assets |
10 | 28.5 | 22.2 | 29.3 | ||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
— | 2.3 | 0.3 | |||||||||||
Trade and other receivables |
11 | 49.8 | 25.8 | 38.2 | ||||||||||
382.5 | 1,112.1 | 339.9 | ||||||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||||||||
Trade and other receivables |
11 | 626.8 | 484.5 | 598.8 | ||||||||||
Unbilled Revenue |
99.1 | 47.3 | 81.5 | |||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
— | 23.8 | — | |||||||||||
Investments in bank deposits |
846.2 | — | 894.8 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
12 | 351.4 | 187.5 | 290.5 | ||||||||||
1,923.5 | 743.1 | 1,865.6 | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
2,306.0 | 1,855.2 | 2,205.5 | |||||||||||
EQUITY |
||||||||||||||
Capital and reserves
attributable to equity holders
of the company |
||||||||||||||
Ordinary shares |
13 | 33.2 | 33.0 | 33.1 | ||||||||||
Shares subscribed but unissued |
— | 1.1 | 0.5 | |||||||||||
Share premium |
342.5 | 312.8 | 329.1 | |||||||||||
Treasury shares |
(1.1 | ) | (1.2 | ) | (1.1 | ) | ||||||||
Share-based payment reserve |
14 | 55.4 | 46.1 | 57.1 | ||||||||||
Retained earnings |
1,360.7 | 1,022.0 | 1,231.8 | |||||||||||
Currency translation reserve |
24.2 | 129.9 | 149.3 | |||||||||||
1,814.9 | 1,543.7 | 1,799.8 | ||||||||||||
Minority interest |
— | — | — | |||||||||||
Total equity |
1,814.9 | 1,543.7 | 1,799.8 | |||||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
||||||||||||||
Borrowings |
16 | 5.7 | 23.6 | 24.8 | ||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
1.0 | — | — | |||||||||||
Retirement benefit obligations |
17 | 13.3 | 10.0 | 14.6 | ||||||||||
Other non-current liabilities |
2.0 | — | 1.1 | |||||||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
10 | 11.1 | 16.3 | 11.7 | ||||||||||
33.1 | 49.9 | 52.2 | ||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||||||||
Preference shares of subsidiary |
15 | — | 13.6 | — | ||||||||||
Trade and other payables |
18 | 146.5 | 71.3 | 119.4 | ||||||||||
Unearned revenue |
36.6 | 24.0 | 33.1 | |||||||||||
Current income tax liabilities |
39.1 | 17.0 | 30.0 | |||||||||||
Other current liabilities |
94.1 | 83.8 | 95.5 | |||||||||||
Retirement benefit obligations |
17 | 44.6 | 31.4 | 43.6 | ||||||||||
Borrowings |
16 | 44.6 | 20.5 | 29.3 | ||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
52.5 | — | 2.6 | |||||||||||
458.0 | 261.6 | 353.5 | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
491.1 | 311.5 | 405.7 | |||||||||||
Total equity & liabilities |
2,306.0 | 1855.2 | 2,205.5 | |||||||||||
1
Quarter ended | Quarter ended | Year ended | ||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | March 31, | ||||||||||||
Note | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | |||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | (audited) | ||||||||||||
Revenue |
637.3 | 452.3 | 2,138.1 | |||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
19 | (383.9 | ) | (288.9 | ) | (1,357.3 | ) | |||||||
Gross profit |
253.4 | 163.4 | 780.8 | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
19 | (116.4 | ) | (73.0 | ) | (369.3 | ) | |||||||
Gain/(loss) on foreign exchange fluctuation |
45.8 | (21.4 | ) | (8.9 | ) | |||||||||
Other income/ (expense) |
22 | (54.7 | ) | 22.5 | 11.2 | |||||||||
Operating profit |
128.1 | 91.5 | 413.8 | |||||||||||
Finance income |
21 | 16.2 | 16.4 | 67.4 | ||||||||||
Finance costs |
21 | (1.3 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (7.0 | ) | |||||||
Finance income, net |
14.9 | 15.6 | 60.4 | |||||||||||
Share of profits/(losses) in joint ventures |
8.2 | 0.1 | — | 0.1 | ||||||||||
Profit before income tax |
143.1 | 107.1 | 474.3 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense |
23 | (14.2 | ) | (12.0 | ) | (52.5 | ) | |||||||
Profit for the year |
128.9 | 95.1 | 421.8 | |||||||||||
Attributable to: |
||||||||||||||
Equity holders of the company |
128.9 | 95.1 | 421.8 | |||||||||||
Minority interest |
— | — | — | |||||||||||
128.9 | 95.1 | 421.8 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||
Basic |
0.19 | 0.14 | 0.63 | |||||||||||
Diluted |
0.19 | 0.14 | 0.62 |
2
Attributable to equity holders of the Company | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Share- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | subscribed | based | Currency | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ordinary | Par | but | Share | Treasury | payment | Retained | translation | Minority | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
shares | value | unissued | premium | shares | reserve | earnings | reserve | Total | Interest | equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at April 01, 2007 |
667,196,009 | 33.0 | 1.8 | 310.4 | (1.2 | ) | 40.8 | 926.9 | 45.3 | 1,357.0 | — | 1,357.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency translation differences |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | 84.6 | 84.6 | — | 84.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income directly recognised in equity |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | 84.6 | 84.6 | — | 84.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
— | — | — | — | — | — | 95.1 | — | 95.1 | — | 95.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total recognised income and expense for
the quarter ended June 30, 2007 |
— | — | — | — | — | — | 95.1 | 84.6 | 179.7 | — | 179.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employees
share-based payment scheme |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— value of employees services |
— | — | — | — | — | 5.9 | — | — | 5.9 | — | 5.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— proceeds from shares issued |
474,514 | — | (1.8 | ) | 2.4 | — | (0.6 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares subscribed but un-issued |
— | — | 1.1 | — | — | — | — | — | 1.1 | — | 1.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
474,514 | — | (0.7 | ) | 2.4 | — | 5.3 | 95.1 | 84.6 | 186.7 | — | 186.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2007 |
667,670,523 | 33.0 | 1.1 | 312.8 | (1.2 | ) | 46.1 | 1,022.0 | 129.9 | 1,543.7 | — | 1,543.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at April 01, 2008 |
670,479,293 | 33.1 | 0.5 | 329.1 | (1.1 | ) | 57.1 | 1,231.8 | 149.3 | 1,799.8 | — | 1,799.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency translation differences |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | (125.1 | ) | (125.1 | ) | — | (125.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income directly recognised in equity |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | (125.1 | ) | (125.1 | ) | — | (125.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
— | — | — | — | — | — | 128.9 | — | 128.9 | — | 128.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total recognised income and expense for
the quarter ended June 30, 2008 |
— | — | — | — | — | — | 128.9 | (125.1 | ) | 3.8 | — | 3.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employees
share-based payment scheme |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— value of employees services |
— | — | — | — | — | 4.3 | — | — | 4.3 | — | 4.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— proceeds from shares issued |
2,029,227 | 0.1 | (0.5 | ) | 13.4 | — | (6.0 | ) | — | — | 7.0 | — | 7.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2,029,227 | 0.1 | (0.5 | ) | 13.4 | — | (1.7 | ) | 128.9 | (125.1 | ) | 15.1 | — | 15.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
672,508,520 | 33.2 | — | 342.5 | (1.1 | ) | 55.4 | 1,360.7 | 24.2 | 1,814.9 | — | 1,814.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3
Attributable to equity holders of the Company | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Share- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | subscribed | based | Currency | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ordinary | Par | but | Share | Treasury | payment | Retained | translation | Minority | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
shares | value | unissued | premium | shares | reserve | earnings | reserve | Total | Interest | equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at April 01, 2007 |
667,196,009 | 33.0 | 1.8 | 310.4 | (1.2 | ) | 40.8 | 926.9 | 45.3 | 1,357.0 | — | 1,357.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency translation differences |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | 104.0 | 104.0 | — | 104.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of preference shares of subsidiary into
equity of the subsidiary |
— | — | — | — | — | — | (46.5 | ) | — | (46.5 | ) | — | (46.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on dilution of interest in subsidiary, net of taxes |
— | — | — | — | — | — | 0.5 | — | 0.5 | — | 0.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income directly recognised in equity |
— | — | — | — | — | — | (2.6 | ) | — | (2.6 | ) | (2.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
— | — | — | — | — | — | (48.6 | ) | 104.0 | 55.4 | — | 55.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total recognised income and expense for the year ended
March 31, 2008 |
— | — | — | — | — | — | 421.8 | — | 421.8 | — | 421.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employees
share-based payment scheme |
— | — | — | — | — | — | 373.2 | 104.0 | 477.2 | — | 477.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— value of employees services |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— proceeds from shares issued |
— | — | — | — | — | 23.0 | — | — | 23.0 | — | 23.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock split effected in the form of dividend |
3,283,284 | 0.1 | (1.8 | ) | 18.7 | 0.1 | (6.7 | ) | — | — | 10.4 | — | 10.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares subscribed but un issued |
— | — | 0.5 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.5 | — | 0.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid |
— | — | — | — | — | — | (68.3 | ) | — | (68.3 | ) | — | (68.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3,283,284 | 0.1 | (1.3 | ) | 18.7 | 0.1 | 16.3 | 304.9 | 104.0 | 442.8 | — | 442.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
670,479,293 | 33.1 | 0.5 | 329.1 | (1.1 | ) | 57.1 | 1,231.8 | 149.3 | 1,799.8 | — | 1,799.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4
Quarter ended | Quarter ended | Year ended | ||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | March 31, | ||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | (audited) | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||||||
Profit before income tax |
143.1 | 107.1 | 474.3 | |||||||||
Adjustments for |
||||||||||||
Share-based payment expense |
4.3 | 5.9 | 23.0 | |||||||||
Financial costs |
1.3 | 0.8 | 7.0 | |||||||||
Finance income |
(16.2 | ) | (16.4 | ) | (67.4 | ) | ||||||
Depreciation and amortisation |
11.5 | 9.3 | 40.3 | |||||||||
(Gain)/loss on sale of premises and equipment |
0.1 | 0.1 | 0.6 | |||||||||
Changes in value of preference shares designated at fair value
through profit or loss |
— | — | (1.6 | ) | ||||||||
Gain/(loss) on foreign exchange forward and option contracts |
53.0 | (21.1 | ) | (7.4 | ) | |||||||
Share of (profits)/losses of joint ventures, net of taxes |
(0.1 | ) | — | (0.1 | ) | |||||||
197.0 | 85.7 | 468.7 | ||||||||||
Movements in working capital |
||||||||||||
— Trade and other receivable |
(81.4 | ) | (64.9 | ) | (184.3 | ) | ||||||
— Unbilled revenue |
(23.5 | ) | (6.0 | ) | (39.9 | ) | ||||||
— Trade and other payables |
34.1 | 2.2 | 48.8 | |||||||||
— Unearned revenue |
5.8 | 2.4 | 11.4 | |||||||||
— Other liabilities |
(6.3 | ) | 30.3 | 61.2 | ||||||||
— Retirement benefit obligations |
3.7 | 1.3 | 17.8 | |||||||||
Cash generated from operations |
129.4 | 51.0 | 383.7 | |||||||||
Income taxes paid |
(3.8 | ) | (9.8 | ) | (49.4 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
125.6 | 41.2 | 334.3 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||||||
Purchase of premises and equipment |
(30.8 | ) | (21.6 | ) | (96.7 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
0.1 | 0.3 | 0.9 | |||||||||
Purchase consideration paid on acquisition of interest in
subsidiaries, net of cash acquired |
(19.1 | ) | (4.2 | ) | (60.5 | ) | ||||||
Investments in bank deposits |
(0.2 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Proceeds from maturity of bank deposits |
— | — | — | |||||||||
Interest received |
3.8 | 3.9 | 15.6 | |||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(46.2 | ) | (21.6 | ) | (140.7 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||||||
Net proceeds from issue of new shares |
7.0 | — | 10.4 | |||||||||
Shares subscribed but unissued |
— | 1.1 | 0.5 | |||||||||
Proceeds from borrowings |
2.1 | 11.1 | 27.6 | |||||||||
Repayment of borrowings |
(5.6 | ) | (5.2 | ) | (15.2 | ) | ||||||
Redemption of preference shares of subsidiary |
— | (13.8 | ) | |||||||||
Interest and finance charges paid |
(1.3 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (5.4 | ) | ||||||
Capital element in finance lease payments |
(0.2 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Dividends paid |
— | — | (68.3 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities |
2.0 | 6.2 | (64.2 | ) | ||||||||
Effect of foreign exchange fluctuation on cash and cash equivalents |
(20.5 | ) | 9.5 | 8.9 | ||||||||
Net increase or decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
81.4 | 25.8 | 129.4 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year |
290.5 | 152.2 | 152.2 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year |
351.4 | 187.5 | 290.5 | |||||||||
Assets acquired under finance lease and hire purchase |
7.4 | 1.6 | 5.2 |
5
1. | General information | |
Satyam Computer Services Limited and its consolidated subsidiaries and joint ventures (hereinafter referred to as “Satyam” or “the group”) are engaged in providing Information Technology (“IT”) services and Business Process Outsourcing (“BPO”) services. Satyam Computer Services Limited (hereinafter referred to as “Satyam Computer Services” or “the Company”) is an IT services provider that uses a global infrastructure to deliver value-added services to its customers, to address IT needs in specific industries and to facilitate electronic business or eBusiness initiatives. Satyam Computer Services was incorporated on June 24, 1987 in Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India. The range of services offered by Satyam Computer Services includes consulting, systems design, software development, systems integration and application maintenance. Satyam Computer Services offers a comprehensive range of IT services, including application development and maintenance, consulting and enterprise business solutions, extended engineering solutions and infrastructure management services. Satyam provides its customers the ability to meet all of their information technology needs from one service provider. Satyam’s eBusiness services include designing, developing integrating and maintaining internet-based applications, such as eCommerce websites, and implementing packaged software applications, such as customer or supply chain management software applications. Satyam also assists its customers in making their existing computing systems accessible over the internet. Satyam has established a diversified base of corporate customers in a wide range of industries including insurance, banking and financial services, manufacturing, telecommunications, transportation and engineering services. | ||
Satyam BPO Limited (“Satyam BPO”), erstwhile Nipuna Services Limited (“Nipuna”) a wholly owned subsidiary of Satyam Computer Services is engaged in providing BPO services covering HR, finance and accounting, customer care (voice, mail and chat) and transaction processing (industry-specific offerings). | ||
Satyam Computer Services is listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange (“BSE”) and the National Stock Exchange (“NSE”) in India, New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) in the US and NYSE Euronext (“NXT”) in the Netherlands. | ||
These consolidated interim financial statements have been approved for issue by the Board of Directors on July 18, 2008. Interim financial information relating to the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007 has not been audited. |
2. | Summary of significant accounting policies | |
2.1. | Basis of preparation | |
These consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34, Interim financial reporting, and complies with all of the requirements of each of the International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. | ||
These consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with those IFRS standards and IFRIC interpretations issued and effective or issued and early adopted as at June 30, 2008. The policies set out below have been consistently applied to all the periods presented. | ||
These consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of available-for-sale financial assets and financial assets /financial liabilities (including derivative instruments) at fair value through profit or loss. | ||
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise judgement in the process of applying the group’s accounting policies. The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated interim financial statements are disclosed in Note 4. | ||
2.1.1. | Standards, amendment and interpretations effective as at June 30, 2008 |
• | IFRIC 13, Customer loyalty programmes (effective from April 01, 2008). IFRIC 13 clarifies that where goods or services are sold together with a customer loyalty incentive (for example, loyalty points or free products), the arrangement is a multiple-element arrangement and the consideration receivable from the customer is allocated between the components of the arrangement using fair values. The interpretation does not have an impact on the group’s financial statements. | ||
• | IFRIC 14, IAS 19 — The limit on a defined benefit asset, minimum funding requirements and their interaction. IFRIC 14 provides guidance on assessing the limit in IAS 19 on the amount of the surplus that can be recognized as an asset. It also explains how the pension asset or liability may be affected by a statutory or contractual minimum funding requirement. The interpretation does not have an impact on the group’s financial statements. |
2.1.2. | Standards, amendments and interpretations effective as at June 30, 2008 but not relevant | |
The following standards, amendments and interpretations to published standards are mandatory from the financial year beginning on April 01, 2007 but are not relevant to Satyam’s operations: |
• | IFRS 4, Insurance contracts; and | ||
• | IFRIC 7, Applying the restatement approach under IAS 29, Financial reporting in hyper-inflationary economies. | ||
• | IFRIC 12, Service concession arrangements. |
6
2.1.3. | Standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards that are not yet effective and have been early adopted by the group | |
The following standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards have been published and are mandatory for the group’s financial year beginning on April 01, 2009 or later periods, but Satyam has early adopted them: |
• | IFRS 8, Operating segments was early adopted by Satyam as at March 31, 2008. IFRS 8 replaces IAS 14 and aligns segment reporting with the requirements of the US standard SFAS 131, ‘Disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information’. The new standard requires a ‘management approach’, under which segment information is presented on the same basis as that used for internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker. The application of this standard did not result in any change in the number of reportable segments. Reallocation of goodwill was not required and there has been no further impact on the measurement of Satyam’s assets and liabilities. |
2.1.4. | Standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards that are not yet effective and have not been early adopted by the group | |
The following standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards have been published and are mandatory for the group’s financial year beginning on April 01, 2008 or later periods, but Satyam has not early adopted them: |
• | IAS 1 (Revised), Presentation of financial statements, the new standard prohibits the presentation of items of income and expenses (that is, ‘non owner changes in equity’) in the statement of changes in equity, requiring ‘owner changes in equity’ to be presented separately from non owner changes in equity. In addition, entities making restatements or reclassifications of comparative information will be required to present a restated balance sheet as at the beginning of the comparative period, the group will apply the revised standard from April 01, 2009. Management is in the process of evaluating the impact which the revised standard will have on the presentation of the financial statements. | ||
• | IAS 23 (Revised), Borrowing costs. It requires an entity to capitalise borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset (one that takes a substantial period of time to get ready for use or sale) as part of the cost of that asset. The option of immediately expensing those borrowing costs will be removed. The group will apply IAS 23 (revised) from April 01, 2009 but is currently not applicable to the group as there are no qualifying assets. | ||
• | IAS 27 (Revised), Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. It requires a mandatory adoption of economic entity model which treats all providers of equity capital as shareholders of the entity. Consequently, a partial disposal of interest in a subsidiary in which the parent company retains control does not result in a gain or loss but in an increase or decrease in equity. Purchase of some or all of the non-controlling interests (also known as minority interests) (“NCI”) is treated as treasury transaction and accounted for in equity. A partial disposal of interest in a subsidiary in which the parent company loses control triggers recognition of gain or loss on the entire interest. A gain or loss is recognised on the portion that has been disposed of; a further holding gain is recognised on the interest retained, being the difference between the fair value of the interest and book value of the interest. | ||
The revised standard requires an entity to attribute their share of net income and reserves to the NCI even if this results in the NCI having a deficit balance. | |||
The group will apply IAS 27 (Revised) from April 01, 2010. Satyam does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material effect on the consolidated financials statements. | |||
• | Amendment to IFRS 2, Share based payment. It clarifies that only service conditions and performance conditions are vesting conditions. All other features need to be included in the grant date fair value and do not impact the number of awards expected to vest or valuation subsequent to grant date. The amendment also specifies that all cancellation, whether by entity or by other parties, should receive the same accounting treatment. The group will apply the amendment from April 01, 2009 but is currently not applicable to the group. | ||
• | IFRS 3 (Revised), Business Combinations. It has expanded the scope to include combinations by contract alone and combination of mutual entities and slightly amended the definition of business as ‘capable of being conducted’ rather than ‘are conducted and managed’. All the acquisition-related costs are to be recognised as period expenses in accordance with the appropriate IFRS. Costs incurred to issue debt or equity securities will be recognised in accordance with IAS 39. | ||
Consideration would include fair value of all interests previously held by the acquirer. Remeasurement of such interests to fair value would be through income statement. Contingent consideration is required to be recognised at fair value even if not deemed probable of payment at the date of acquisition. All subsequent changes in debt contingent consideration are recognised in income statement and not in goodwill as required in the existing standard. | |||
IFRS 3 (Revised) provides an explicit option, available on a transaction-by-transaction basis, to measure any NCI in the entity acquired at fair value of their proportion of identifiable assets and liabilities or full fair value. The first will result in measurement of goodwill little different from existing IFRS 3; the second approach will record goodwill on the NCI as well as on the acquired controlling interest. | |||
The standard further provides additional guidance on share-based payment grants that form part of the business combination and on assessment for classification of certain contracts and arrangements of the acquired business at the date of the acquisition. Current guidance requires deferred tax assets of the acquired business that are not recognised at the date of the combination but subsequently meet the recognition criteria to be adjusted against goodwill. The revised standard will only allow adjustments against goodwill within the one-year window for finalisation of the purchase accounting. | |||
The group will apply IFRS 3 (Revised) from April 01, 2010. The effect of the standard on future periods will depend on the nature and significance of any acquisitions that are subject to this standard. |
7
2.1.5. | Standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards that are not yet effective and not relevant for the group’s operations |
• | Amendment to IAS 32, Financial instruments, Presentation and IAS 1, Presentation of financial statements —Puttable financial instruments and obligations arising on liquidation (effective from April 01, 2009). The amendment requires entities to classify certain types of financial instruments as equity, provided they have particular features and meet specific conditions. | ||
• | Amendment to IFRS, First time adoption of IFRS and IAS 27, Consolidated and separate financial statements (effective from April 01, 2009). The amendment allows first-time adopters to use a deemed cost of either fair value or the carrying amount under previous accounting practice to measure the initial cost of investments in subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities and associates in the separate financial statements. The amendment also removed the definition of the cost method from IAS 27 and replaced it with a requirement to present dividends as income in the separate financial statements of the investor. |
2.2. | Consolidation | |
Domestic and foreign subsidiaries, joint ventures and special purpose entities considered for consolidation are as follows: |
Country of | Percentage of holding | |||||||||
incorporation | as at June 30, 2008 | |||||||||
Direct subsidiaries | ||||||||||
1) |
Satyam BPO Limited | India | 100.00% | |||||||
2) |
Satyam Computer Services (Shanghai) Co. Limited | China | 100.00% | |||||||
3) |
Satyam Computer Services (Nanjing) Co. Limited | China | 100.00% | |||||||
4) |
Satyam Computer Services (Egypt) S. A. E. | Egypt | 100.00% | |||||||
5) |
Satyam Technologies, Inc. | USA | 100.00% | |||||||
6) |
Knowledge Dynamics Pte Limited | Singapore | 100.00% | |||||||
7) |
Citisoft Plc | UK | 100.00% | |||||||
8) |
Nitor Global Solutions Limited | UK | 100.00% | |||||||
9) |
Bridge Strategy Group LLC | USA | 100.00% | |||||||
Indirect subsidiaries | ||||||||||
9) |
Subsidiaries of Knowledge Dynamics Pte Limited | |||||||||
— Knowledge Dynamics Private Limited | India | 99.99% | ||||||||
— Knowledge Dynamics USA, Inc. | USA | 98.00% | ||||||||
— Info on Demand SDN BHD (ceased to exist from October 1, 2007) | Malaysia | — | ||||||||
10) |
Subsidiaries of Citisoft Plc | |||||||||
— Citisoft Inc. | USA | 100.00% | ||||||||
Jointly controlled entities | ||||||||||
11) |
CA Satyam ASP Private Limited | India | 50.00% | |||||||
12) |
Satyam Venture Engineering Services Private Limited | India | 50.00% | |||||||
Special purpose entities | ||||||||||
13) |
Satyam Associates Trust | India |
The reporting date for all the above companies is March 31 except as following: |
• | Satyam Computer Services (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. — December 31 | ||
• | Satyam Computer Services (Nanjing) Co. Ltd. — December 31 | ||
• | Satyam Technologies Inc. — December 31 | ||
• | Nitor Global Solutions Limited — May 31 | ||
• | Bridge Strategy Group LLC. — December 31 | ||
a) | Subsidiaries |
Subsidiaries are all entities (including special purpose entities) over which the group has the power to govern the financial and operating policies so as to obtain economic benefits from its activities, generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one half of the voting rights. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether the group controls another entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the group. They are de-consolidated from the date that control ceases. | ||
The purchase method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries by the group. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the fair value of the assets given, equity instruments issued and liabilities incurred or assumed at the date of exchange, plus costs directly attributable to the acquisition. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date, irrespective of the extent of any minority interest. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the group’s |
8
share of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. If the cost of acquisition is less than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired, the difference is recognized directly in the income statement. | ||
Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between group companies are eliminated. Unrealised losses are also eliminated but considered an impairment indicator of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the group. | ||
Satyam has employee benefit trust SC-Trust which purchases and holds ordinary shares of Satyam Computer Services (treasury shares) in connection with employee share-based payment schemes. Satyam controls the activities of the trust and pursuant to the criteria set out in SIC-12, Consolidation — Special Purpose Entities, consolidates the trust. |
b) | Joint ventures |
Joint ventures are all entities, formed under contractual arrangements, over which Satyam has joint control along with the other venturers. Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of control over the entities, and exists only when the strategic financial and operating decisions relating to the activity require the unanimous consent of Satyam and the other parties sharing control. Investments in joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method of accounting and are initially recognized at cost. Satyam’s investment in joint ventures includes goodwill identified on acquisition, if any, net of any accumulated impairment loss (see Note 8.2). | ||
Satyam’s share of its joint ventures’ post-acquisition profits or losses is recognized in the income statement, and its share of post-acquisition movements in reserves is recognized in reserves. The cumulative post-acquisition movements are adjusted against the carrying amount of the investment. When Satyam’s share of losses in a joint venture equals or exceeds its interest in the joint venture, including any other unsecured receivables, Satyam does not recognise further losses, unless it has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the joint venture. Unrealised gains on transactions between Satyam and its joint ventures are eliminated to the extent of Satyam’s interest in the joint ventures. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of joint ventures have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the group. | ||
Dilution gains and losses in joint ventures are recognized in the equity statement. |
c) | Transactions with minority interests |
The group applies a policy of treating transactions with minority interests as transactions with shareholders of the group. On disposal to minority interest, the difference between the proceeds and the share disposed off is accounted for in reserves. Similarly, on purchase of minority interests, the difference between any consideration paid and the relevant share acquired of the carrying value of net assets of the subsidiary is recorded in equity. |
2.3. | Segment reporting | |
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker. The Managing Director of Satyam Computer Services has been identified as the chief operating decision-maker that makes strategic decisions, allocates resources to and assesses the performance of the operating segments. | ||
2.4. | Foreign currency translation |
a) | Functional and presentation currency |
Items included in the financial statements in each of the group’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (“the functional currency”). Indian rupee is the functional currency of Satyam Computer Services, its domestic subsidiaries and joint ventures. US dollar, Pound sterling, Singapore dollar and Renminbi are the functional currencies of Satyam’s foreign subsidiaries located in the US, the UK, Singapore and China respectively. These consolidated interim financial statements are presented in US Dollars (“US$”), which is the group’s presentation currency. | ||
The results and financial position of the group are translated into presentation currency as follows: |
• | assets and liabilities for each balance sheet presented are translated at the closing rate at the date of that balance sheet; | ||
• | income and expenses for each income statement are translated at average exchange rates; and | ||
• | all resulting exchange differences are recognised as a separate component of equity. | ||
b) | Transactions and balances |
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in the income statement. |
c) | Group companies |
On consolidation, exchange differences arising from the translation of the net investment in foreign operations are taken to shareholders’ equity. When a foreign operation is partially disposed off or sold, exchange differences that were recorded in equity are recognized in the income statement as part of the gain or loss on sale. Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at the closing rate. |
9
2.5. | Premises and equipment |
Premises and equipment are stated at actual cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses. The cost of an item of premises and equipment comprises its purchase price and any costs directly attributable to bringing the asset into use. | ||
Depreciation on premises and equipment is recognized on the straight line basis over their estimated useful lives. The cost of and the accumulated depreciation for premises and equipment sold, retired or otherwise disposed off are removed from the stated values and the resulting gains and losses are included in the income statement. | ||
The estimated useful lives are as follows: |
Buildings
|
28 years | |||
Computers and servers
|
2-5 years | |||
Office equipment
|
5 years | |||
Furniture, fixtures and interiors
|
5 years | |||
Vehicles
|
5 years |
The residual values and useful economic lives of premises and equipment are reviewed annually. | ||
Depreciation on leasehold improvements and assets acquired under a finance lease is provided using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or the useful life of the asset. | ||
Eligible borrowing cost related to the construction of qualifying assets is capitalized | ||
Assets under construction | ||
Assets under installation or under construction as at the balance sheet date are shown as assets under construction. Advances paid towards acquisition of assets are also included under assets under construction. | ||
2.6. | Intangible assets | |
All intangible assets, except goodwill, are stated at cost less accumulated amortisation and any accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill is not amortised and is stated at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. |
a) | Goodwill |
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of Satyam’s share of the net identifiable assets of the acquired subsidiary or associate at the date of acquisition. Goodwill on acquisitions of subsidiaries is included in intangible assets. Goodwill on acquisitions of associates is included in investments in associates and is tested for impairment as part of the overall balance. Separately recognized goodwill is tested annually for impairment and carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Impairment losses on goodwill are not reversed. Gains and losses on the disposal of an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill relating to the entity sold. Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units for the purpose of impairment testing. The allocation is made to those cash-generating units or groups of cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the business combination in which the goodwill arose. |
b) | Software |
Expenditure incurred on research is expensed in the income statement as incurred. Cost of acquired software for internal use is generally charged to the income statement as incurred if the estimated useful lives are relatively short, usually less than one year and amortised over the estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis if the estimated useful lives are beyond one year. |
c) | Other intangible assets |
Other intangible assets identified in business combinations, comprising of customer contracts, internally developed technology and non-compete agreements are amortised over their estimated useful life on a straight-line basis. |
2.7. | Impairment of non-financial assets | |
Assets that have an indefinite useful life, for example goodwill, are not subject to amortisation and are tested annually for impairment. Assets that are subject to amortisation are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash-generating units). Non-financial assets other than goodwill that suffered impairment are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at each reporting date. | ||
2.8. | Financial assets | |
The financial assets held by Satyam are primarily loans and receivables. The classification of financial assets depends on the purpose for which the financial assets were acquired. Management determines the classification of its financial assets at initial recognition. | ||
Loans and receivables | ||
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are included in current assets, except for maturities greater than 12 months after the balance sheet date. These are classified as non-current assets. The group’s loans and receivables comprise trade and other receivables, investments in bank deposits and cash and cash equivalents in the balance sheet (Note 2.10, 2.12 and 2.13). |
10
Satyam assesses at each balance sheet date whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. Impairment testing of trade receivables is described in Note 2.10. | ||
2.9. | Derivative financial instruments | |
The group purchases foreign exchange forward contracts and options to mitigate the risk of changes in foreign exchange rates associated with certain payables, receivables and forecasted transactions denominated in certain foreign currencies. These derivative contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting under IAS 39, and are initially recognized at fair value on the date the contract is entered into and subsequently remeasured at their fair value. Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of the derivative contracts are recognized in the income statement. | ||
2.10. | Trade and other receivables | |
Trade receivables are recognized initially at fair value. They are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, net of provision for impairment, if the effect of discounting is considered material. The carrying amounts, net of provision for impairment, reported in the balance sheet approximate the fair value due to their short realisation period. A provision for impairment of trade receivables is established when there is objective evidence that Satyam will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of receivables. The provision is established at amounts considered to be appropriate, based primarily upon Satyam’s past credit loss experience and an evaluation of potential losses on the receivables. The amount of the provision is recognized in the income statement. | ||
2.11. | Unbilled revenue and unearned revenue | |
Amounts which relate to recoverable costs and accrued profits not yet billed on contracts are classified in current assets as “Unbilled revenue on contracts”. Billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of recoverable cost and accrued profit are classified in current liabilities as “Unearned revenue”. | ||
2.12. | Investments in bank deposits | |
Investments in bank deposits represent term deposits placed with banks earning fixed rate of interest. Investments in bank deposits with maturities of less than a year are disclosed as current assets and more than one year as non current. At the balance sheet date, these deposits are measured at amortised cost using effective interest method. | ||
2.13. | Cash and cash equivalents | |
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand and at bank, and short-term deposits with an original maturity period of three months or less. Bank overdrafts that are an integral part of cash management and where there is a legal right of set-off against positive cash balances are included in cash and cash equivalents. Otherwise bank overdrafts are classified as borrowings. | ||
2.14. | Share capital | |
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Preference shares are assessed for classification under equity or liability (Note 2.15). Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds. | ||
Where any group entity purchases the equity share capital of Satyam Computer Services (treasury shares), the consideration paid, including any directly attributable incremental costs (net of taxes) is deducted from equity attributable to the equity holders of Satyam Computer Services until the shares are reissued. Where such shares are subsequently reissued, any consideration received net of any directly attributable incremental transaction costs and the related income tax effects, is included in the equity attributable to equity holders of Satyam Computer Services. | ||
2.15. | Borrowings | |
Borrowings are recognized initially at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are subsequently stated at amortised cost; any difference between the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption value is recognized in the income statement over the period of the borrowings using the effective interest method. | ||
Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the balance sheet date. In respect of borrowings with repayment schedule, classification as current and non-current liabilities is based on the repayment schedule. | ||
Borrowings designated at fair value through profit or loss is initially recognised at fair value. A borrowing is classified in this category if it contains embedded derivatives, which significantly modify the cash flows that otherwise would be required by the host instrument. These borrowings are re-measured at each reporting date with the changes in fair value recognised in the income statement. | ||
2.16. | Current and deferred income tax | |
The current income tax charge is calculated on the basis of the tax laws enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date in the countries where the group operates and generates taxable income. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulations are subject to interpretation and establishes provisions, where appropriate, on the basis of amounts expected to be paid to the tax authorities. | ||
Deferred income tax is provided in full, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated interim financial statements. However, the deferred income tax is not accounted for if it arises from initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction other than a |
11
business combination that at the time of the transaction affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss. Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates and laws that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the balance sheet date and are expected to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realised or the deferred income tax liability is settled. | ||
Deferred income tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised. | ||
Deferred income tax is provided on temporary differences, if any, arising on investments in subsidiaries and joint ventures, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the group and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future. | ||
Current and deferred income tax are recognized in the income statement, except when the tax relates to items charged or credited directly to equity, in which case the tax is also dealt with directly in equity. | ||
2.17. | Employee benefits | |
Employee benefits are accrued in the period in which the associated services are rendered by employees of the group. Contributions to defined contribution schemes such as Provident Fund, Employee State Insurance Scheme and Superannuation are charged to income statement on accrual basis. |
a) | Gratuity |
The Gratuity Plan is a defined benefit plan that, at retirement or termination of employment, provides eligible employees with a lump sum payment, which is a function of the last drawn salary and completed years of service. The liability recognised in the balance sheet in respect of gratuity plan is the present value of the defined benefit obligation at the balance sheet date less the fair value of plan assets, if any, together with adjustments for unrecognised past-service costs. The defined benefit obligation is calculated annually by independent actuaries using the projected unit credit method. The present value of the defined benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated future cash outflows using interest rates of Government of India securities and that have terms to maturity approximating to the terms of the related gratuity liability. | ||
Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are charged or credited to income statement in the period in which they arise. |
b) | Compensated absences |
Satyam operates both accumulating and non-accumulating absences plan. Satyam measures the expected cost of accumulating compensated absences as the additional amount expected to be paid as a result of the unused entitlement that has accumulated at the balance sheet date. Expense on non-accumulating compensated absences is recognised in the period in which the absences occur. |
c) | Share-based payment |
Satyam operates a number of equity-settled share-based compensation plans. The fair value of the employee services received in exchange for the grant of the options is recognized as an expense. The total amount to be expensed over the vesting period is determined by reference to the fair value of the options granted, excluding the impact of any non-market vesting conditions (for example, profitability and sales growth targets). Non-market vesting conditions are included in assumptions about the number of options that are expected to vest. At each balance sheet date, the entity revises its estimates of the number of options that are expected to vest. It recognises the impact of the revision to original estimates, if any, in the income statement, with a corresponding adjustment to equity. |
2.18. | Revenue Recognition |
a) | IT Services |
Revenues from IT services, which includes software development, system maintenance, package software implementation, engineering design services and e-Business consist of revenues earned from services performed either on a time-and-material basis or time bound fixed price engagements. | ||
Revenues earned from services performed on a time-and-material basis are recognized as the services are performed. IT services performed on time bound fixed-price engagements; require accurate estimation of the costs which include salaries and related expenses of technical associates, related communication expenses, travel costs and scope and duration of each engagement. Revenue and the related costs for these projects are recognized on percentage-of-completion basis, with revisions to estimates reflected in the period in which changes become known. Provisions for estimated losses on such engagements are made during the period in which a loss becomes probable and can be reasonably estimated. | ||
The use of the percentage-of-completion method reflects the pattern in which the obligations to the customer are fulfilled. Satyam has used an input-based approach since the input measures are a reasonable surrogate for output measures. The progress of the projects is measured using the efforts expended approach which is based on units of work performed (hours spent by project staff). | ||
The extent of progress to date on the projects, estimates of future efforts for completion of the projects and the variance of the revised project plans from the original project plan are continuously monitored. The direct relationship between the efforts expended and the productivity in measuring progress towards completion makes the efforts expended method more reliable and also the best approximation of progress towards completion. |
b) | Business Process Outsourcing |
Revenues from BPO services consist of revenues from time-and-material services or time bound fixed- price |
12
engagements. Revenues from time-and-material services are recognized as the services are performed. Revenues from BPO services are also on time bound fixed price engagements, under which revenue is recognized using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. The cumulative impact of any revision in estimates of the percentage of work completed is reflected in the period in which the change becomes known. Provisions for estimated losses are made during the year in which a loss becomes probable and can be reasonably estimated. |
c) | Warranty |
Satyam provides its clients with one to three month warranty as post-sale support for its fixed price engagements. Satyam has not provided for any warranty costs for the years ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 as historically Satyam has not incurred any expenditure on account of warranties and since the customer is required to formally sign off on the work performed, any subsequent work is usually covered by an additional contract. | ||
2.19. | Leases | |
Rentals payable under operating leases are charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the lease term. | ||
2.20. | Dividend distribution | |
Dividends to the shareholders of Satyam Computer Services are recognized as a liability and deducted from shareholders’ equity in the year in which the dividends are approved by the shareholders of Satyam Computer Services. Interim dividends that are declared by the Board of directors without the need for shareholders’ approval are recognised as a liability and deducted from shareholders’ equity in the year in which the dividends are declared by the Board of Directors of Satyam Computer Services. | ||
3. | Financial risk management | |
3.1. | Financial risk factors | |
Satyam’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including currency risk, fair value interest rate risk and cash flow interest rate risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. Satyam’s overall risk management programme focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on the financial performance. Satyam Computer Services uses derivative financial instruments to mitigate certain risk exposures. | ||
Satyam’s exposure to credit risk is influenced mainly by the individual characteristic of each customer and the concentration of risk from the top few customers. The demographics of the customer including the default risk of the industry and country in which the customer operates also has an influence on credit risk assessment. The risk management policies include a credit policy under which each new customer is analysed individually for creditworthiness before the standard payment terms and conditions are offered. | ||
Satyam manages foreign exchange and interest rate risks through treasury operations. Its risk management strategy is to identify risks it’s exposed to, evaluate and measure those risks, decide on managing those risks, regular monitoring and reporting to management. The objective of its risk management policy is to minimize risk arising from adverse currency movements by managing the uncertainty and volatility of foreign exchange fluctuations by mitigating the risk to achieve greater predictability and stability. The risk management policies include implementing strategies for foreign currency exposures, specification of transaction limits; specifying authority and responsibility of the personnel involved in executing, monitoring and controlling such transactions. Satyam considers the impact of cash flow and fair value interest risk on the operations as not material. |
a) | Market risk | ||
i) | Foreign exchange risk |
Satyam operates internationally and is exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from various currency exposures, primarily with respect to the US Dollars. Foreign exchange risk arises from future commercial transactions and recognised assets and liabilities. The exchange rate between Indian rupee and the US dollar has changed substantially in recent years and may fluctuate substantially in the future. | ||
Satyam enters into foreign exchange forward and option contracts to mitigate the risk of changes in foreign exchange rates on cash flows denominated in US dollars. | ||
The following tables give details in respect of the outstanding foreign exchange forward and option contracts: |
13
As at June 30, | As at March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Aggregate contracted principal amounts of contracts outstanding |
||||||||||||
Forward contracts |
311.7 | 172.0 | 395.7 | |||||||||
Option contracts |
363.3 | 571.6 | 737.4 | |||||||||
675.0 | 743.6 | 1,133.1 | ||||||||||
Gains/(losses) on outstanding contracts |
||||||||||||
Forward contracts |
(24.5 | ) | 11.8 | (0.7 | ) | |||||||
Option contracts |
(29.0 | ) | 14.3 | (1.6 | ) | |||||||
(53.5 | ) | 26.1 | (2.3 | ) | ||||||||
The outstanding foreign exchange forward and option contracts as at June 30, 2008 mature between one to twenty one months. |
Gains/ (losses) on all foreign exchange forward and option contracts included under ‘Other income’ in the consolidated income statement are as follows: |
Year ended | ||||||||||||
Quarter ended June 30, | March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Forward contracts |
(24.3 | ) | 9.5 | 5.4 | ||||||||
Option contracts |
(30.5 | ) | 12.6 | 3.6 | ||||||||
(54.8 | ) | 22.1 | 9.0 | |||||||||
A 2% increase/decrease in the value of the Indian rupee against US dollar would decrease/increase the gains on outstanding foreign exchange forward and option contracts by US$6.9 and US$3.2 for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and US$4.5 for the year ended March 31, 2008. |
A 3% increase/decrease in the value of the Indian rupee against UK pound, Euro and Australian dollar would decrease/increase the gains on outstanding foreign exchange forward and option contracts by US$ Nil and US$ Nil for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and US$0.1 for the year ended March 31, 2008. |
The sensitivity analysis is based on a reasonably possible change in the underlying foreign currency against the Indian rupee computed from historical data. |
ii) Cash flow and fair value interest rate risk |
The group’s interest rate risk arises from long-term borrowings and investment in bank deposits. Borrowings issued at variable rates expose the group to cash flow interest rate risk while borrowings issued and investment in bank deposits at fixed rates expose the group to fair value interest rate risk. |
Satyam has not entered into any interest rate swaps in respect of the borrowings or investment in bank deposits. However, Satyam continuously monitors the movement of interest rates to determine whether the new borrowings have to be raised or deposits have to be placed at fixed or floating interest rates. |
Borrowings |
The profile of Satyam’s borrowings as at June 30, 2008 is as follows: |
Interest | Computation | Amount | ||||||||
Loan type | Lenders | (per annum) | method | Outstanding | ||||||
Working capital loan
|
BNP Paribas, MB Financial | 6 month LIBOR +0.95% | Floating | 7.8 | ||||||
External commercial borrowing
|
BNP Paribas | 6 month LIBOR +0.95% | Floating | 9.5 | ||||||
Overdraft facility
|
BNP Paribas | 6 month LIBOR +0.25% | Floating | 26.1 | ||||||
Vehicle loans
|
Various other parties |
3%-14% | Fixed | 6.9 |
The table below provides information about group’s financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates as at the dates shown. Weighted average interest rates were based on average interest rates applicable to the loans. |
14
As at June 30, | As at June 30, | As at March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 |
2007 |
2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
average | Amount | average | Amount | average | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
interest | Outstan | interest | Outstan | interest | Outstan | |||||||||||||||||||
rate | ding | rate | ding | rate | ding | |||||||||||||||||||
Fixed interest rate long term borrowings |
10.97 | % | 6.9 | 6.37 | % | 4.5 | 10.0 | % | 6.0 | |||||||||||||||
Variable interest rate long term
borrowings |
8.46 | % | 16.0 | 7.45 | % | 21.1 | 8.0 | % | 21.2 | |||||||||||||||
Variable interest rate short term
borrowings |
9.21 | % | 27.4 | 7.24 | % | 18.5 | 8.4 | % | 26.9 | |||||||||||||||
50.3 | 44.1 | 54.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
A 100 bps increase/decrease in the borrowing interest rates would have impacted the interest on floating interest rate borrowings and decreased/increased the net profit by US$0.5 and US$0.3 for quarter ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and US$0.4 for the year ended March 31, 2008. | ||
The approximate fair value of fixed interest rate long-term debts, as determined using current interest rates was US$7.0 and US$4.5 for quarter ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and US$6.1 for the year ended March 31, 2008 as compared to the carrying amounts of US$6.8 and US$4.5 for quarter ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and US$6.0 for the year ended March 31, 2008. | ||
A 100 bps increase/decrease in the interest rates would have resulted in a decrease/increase in the fair value by US$80 thousand and US$60.0 thousand for quarter ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and US$8.0 thousand for the year ended March 31, 2008. | ||
Investment in bank deposits | ||
Investments in bank deposits denominated in Indian rupee represent term deposits placed with banks earning fixed rate of interest. The carrying value of investments in bank deposits amounted to US$846.3 and US$844.0 as at June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and US$894.8 as at March 31, 2008. The approximate fair value of investment in bank deposits, as determined using current interest rates was US$857.7 and US$827.6 as at June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and US$902.7 as at March 31, 2008.The weighted average rate of interest earned on investment in bank deposits amounted to 8.1% and 8.1% during the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and 8.0% for the year ended March 31, 2008. | ||
A 100 bps increase in current interest rates would have reduced the fair value of investment in bank deposits by US$3.4 and US$10.7 as at June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and US$5.6 as at March 31, 2008 whereas a 100 bps decrease in current interest rates would have increased the fair value of investment in bank deposits by US$3.4 and US$11.0 as at June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and US$5.7 as at March 31, 2008. | ||
The sensitivity analysis is based on a reasonably possible change in the market interest rates computed from historical data. | ||
b) Credit risk | ||
Credit risk refers to the risk of default on its obligation by the counterparty resulting in a financial loss. Trade receivables are typically unsecured and are derived from revenue earned from customers primarily located in the United States. Credit risk is managed through credit approvals, establishing credit limits and continuously monitoring the creditworthiness of customers to which Satyam grants credit terms in the normal course of business. The following table gives details in respect of percentage of revenues generated from top two and top five customers: |
Quarter ended | Year ended | |||||||||||
June 30, | March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Revenue from top two customers |
||||||||||||
Customer I |
4.39 | % | 5.50 | % | 4.88 | % | ||||||
Customer II |
4.02 | % | 4.67 | % | 4.85 | % | ||||||
Revenue from top five customers |
18.38 | % | 20.23 | % | 19.27 | % |
Satyam maintains banking relationships with only creditworthy banks which it reviews on an on-going basis. Satyam enters into foreign exchange derivative instruments where the counter party is generally a bank. Consequently, the credit risk on the derivatives and bank deposits is not considered material. | ||
c) Liquidity risk | ||
Satyam manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate reserves, banking facilities and reserve borrowing facilities, by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and matching the maturity profiles of financial assets and liabilities. | ||
The following table sets forth group’s financial liabilities to make future payments: |
15
Within 1 | After 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
year | 1-3 year | 3-5 years | years | Total | ||||||||||||||||
As at June 30, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Trade and other payables |
146.5 | — | — | — | 146.5 | |||||||||||||||
Borrowings |
45.2 | 6.1 | 0.2 | 51.5 | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition consideration |
1.1 | 8.9 | — | — | 10.0 | |||||||||||||||
Derivative financial liabilities |
52.5 | 1.0 | — | — | 53.5 | |||||||||||||||
245.3 | 16.0 | 0.2 | — | 261.5 | ||||||||||||||||
As at June 30, 2007 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Trade and other payables |
71.3 | — | — | — | 71.3 | |||||||||||||||
Borrowings |
20.7 | 19.3 | 4.6 | — | 44.6 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition consideration |
1.1 | — | — | — | 1.1 | |||||||||||||||
Redemption liability on
Preference shares of subsidiary |
13.6 | — | — | — | 13.6 | |||||||||||||||
Derivative financial liabilities |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
106.7 | 19.3 | 4.6 | — | 130.6 | ||||||||||||||||
As at March 31, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Trade and other payables |
119.4 | — | — | — | 119.4 | |||||||||||||||
Borrowings |
29.7 | 25.1 | 0.2 | — | 55.0 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition consideration |
1.7 | 1.6 | — | — | 3.3 | |||||||||||||||
Derivative financial liabilities |
2.6 | — | — | — | 2.6 | |||||||||||||||
153.4 | 26.7 | 0.2 | — | 180.3 | ||||||||||||||||
Satyam has at its disposal cash and cash equivalents of US$351.4 and US$187.5 as at June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and US$290.5 as at March 31, 2008 and investment in bank deposits of US$846.3 and US$844.0 as at June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and US$894.8 as at March 31, 2008 in addition to the unused lines of credit from banks as at June 30, 2008. | ||
Details of unused lines of credit available from banks as at the balance sheet date are as follows: |
As at | ||||||||||||
As at June 30, | March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Short term debt |
2.3 | 2.4 | 1.6 | |||||||||
Long term debt |
— | — | — | |||||||||
Non-fund facilities |
21.2 | 17.9 | 33.4 | |||||||||
Total |
23.5 | 20.3 | 35.0 | |||||||||
Based on past performance and current expectations, Satyam believes that the cash and cash equivalents and cash generated from operations will satisfy its working capital needs, capital expenditure, investment requirements, stock repurchases, commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations through at least the next 12 months. In addition, there are no transactions, arrangements, and other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons that are reasonably likely to materially affect liquidity or the availability of the requirements for capital resources. |
3.2. | Capital risk management | |
Satyam’s objective when managing capital is to safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern in order to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders. | ||
Total capital of Satyam is ‘equity’ as shown in the consolidated balance sheet plus net debt. Net debt is calculated as total borrowings (including ‘current and non-current borrowings’ as shown in the consolidated balance sheet) less cash and cash equivalents. Net debt as at the reporting date is zero. | ||
In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, Satyam may adjust the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, issue new shares to reduce debt. |
3.3. | Fair value estimation | |
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets (such as trading and available-for-sale securities) is based on quoted market prices at the balance sheet date. The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the group is the current bid price. The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market (for example, over-the counter derivatives) is determined by using valuation techniques. The group uses a variety of methods and makes assumptions that are based on market conditions existing at each balance sheet date. Quoted market prices or dealer quotes for similar instruments are used for long-term debt. Other techniques, such as estimated discounted cash flows, are used to determine fair value for the remaining financial instruments. The fair value of interest rate swaps is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows. The fair value of forward foreign exchange contracts is determined using quoted forward exchange rates at the balance sheet date. |
16
The carrying value less impairment provision, of trade receivables and payables, are assumed to approximate their fair values. The fair value of financial liabilities for disclosure purposes is estimated by discounting the future contractual cash flows at the current market interest rate that is available to the group for similar financial instruments. | ||
4. | Critical accounting estimates and judgements | |
Estimates and judgments are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. | ||
Satyam makes estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The resulting accounting estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are discussed below. |
a) | Income taxes |
Satyam is subject to income taxes in a number of jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining provision for income taxes. There are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain during the ordinary course of business. Satyam recognises liabilities for anticipated tax issues based on estimates of whether additional taxes will be due. Where the final tax outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the income tax and deferred tax provisions in the period in which such determination is made. |
b) | Estimated impairment of goodwill |
Satyam tests annually goodwill for any impairment, in accordance with the accounting policy Note 2.7 above. The recoverable amount of cash generating units is determined based on value-in-use calculations. These calculations require the use of estimates. | ||
If the budgeted gross margin used in the value-in-use calculation had been 1% lower than Satyam’s estimates at March 31, 2008, there would not be any impairment of goodwill. Similarly, if the estimated pre-tax discount rate applied to the discounted cash flows had been 1% higher than Satyam’s estimates, there would not be any impairment of goodwill. |
c) | Revenue recognition |
Satyam uses the percentage-of-completion method in accounting for its fixed-price contracts. The use of the percentage of completion method reflects the pattern in which the obligations to the customer are fulfilled. Satyam has used an input-based approach since the input measures are a reasonable surrogate for output measures. Provisions for estimated losses on such engagements are made during the period in which a loss becomes probable and can be reasonably estimated. | ||
5. | Segmental reporting | |
The operating segments reported below are the segments of Satyam for which separate financial information is available and for which operating profit/loss amounts are evaluated regularly by executive management in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Management evaluates performance based on stand-alone revenues and net income for the companies in Satyam. The executive management evaluates Satyam’s operating segments based on the following two business groups: | ||
— IT services; and | ||
— Business Process Outsourcing | ||
Business Segments | ||
The segment results for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 are as follows: |
IT Services | BPO | Elimination | Group | |||||||||||||
Revenue — external customers |
630.3 | 7.0 | — | 637.3 | ||||||||||||
Revenue — Inter-segment |
— | 4.8 | (4.8 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Total Revenue |
630.3 | 11.8 | (4.8 | ) | 637.3 | |||||||||||
Operating profit/ (loss) |
133.2 | (5.1 | ) | — | 128.1 | |||||||||||
Finance income |
16.2 | — | — | 16.2 | ||||||||||||
Finance cost |
(0.3 | ) | (1.0 | ) | — | (1.3 | ) | |||||||||
Share of profit in joint ventures |
0.1 | — | — | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Profit/(loss) before income tax |
149.2 | (6.1 | ) | — | 143.1 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense |
(14.2 | ) | — | — | (14.2 | ) | ||||||||||
Profit/(loss) for the year |
135.0 | (6.1 | ) | — | 128.9 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
10.2 | 1.3 | — | 11.5 | ||||||||||||
Non-cash expenses other than depreciation |
8.3 | — | — | 8.3 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditure |
62.7 | 0.6 | — | 63.3 | ||||||||||||
Investment in joint ventures |
5.0 | — | — | 5.0 | ||||||||||||
Segment assets |
2,268.1 | 73.5 | (35.6 | ) | 2,306.0 | |||||||||||
Segment liabilities |
422.9 | 84.0 | (15.8 | ) | 491.1 | |||||||||||
17
The segment results for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 are as follows: |
IT Services | BPO | Elimination | Group | |||||||||||||
Revenue — external customers |
443.8 | 8.5 | — | 452.3 | ||||||||||||
Revenue — Inter-segment |
0.3 | 3.4 | (3.7 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Total Revenue |
444.1 | 11.9 | (3.7 | ) | 452.3 | |||||||||||
Operating profit/ (loss) |
92.9 | (1.4 | ) | — | 91.5 | |||||||||||
Finance income |
16.4 | — | — | 16.4 | ||||||||||||
Finance cost |
(0.1 | ) | (0.7 | ) | — | (0.8 | ) | |||||||||
Share of profit in joint ventures |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Profit/(loss) before income tax |
109.2 | (2.1 | ) | — | 107.1 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense |
12.0 | — | — | 12.0 | ||||||||||||
Profit/(loss) for the year |
97.2 | (2.1 | ) | — | 95.1 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
8.0 | 1.3 | — | 9.3 | ||||||||||||
Non-cash expenses other than depreciation |
7.7 | — | — | 7.7 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditure |
21.8 | 1.3 | — | 23.1 | ||||||||||||
Investment in joint ventures |
4.8 | — | — | 4.8 | ||||||||||||
Segment assets |
1,793.6 | 50.5 | 11.1 | 1,855.2 | ||||||||||||
Segment liabilities |
255.8 | 70.1 | (14.5 | ) | 311.5 | |||||||||||
The segment results for the year ended March 31, 2008 are as follows: |
IT Services | BPO | Elimination | Group | |||||||||||||
Revenue — external customers |
2,093.2 | 44.9 | — | 2,138.1 | ||||||||||||
Revenue — Inter-segment |
1.3 | 15.8 | (17.1 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Total Revenue |
2,094.5 | 60.7 | (17.1 | ) | 2,138.1 | |||||||||||
Operating profit/ (loss) |
415.7 | (1.9 | ) | — | 413.8 | |||||||||||
Finance income |
67.4 | — | — | 67.4 | ||||||||||||
Finance cost |
(3.3 | ) | (3.7 | ) | — | (7.0 | ) | |||||||||
Share of profit in joint ventures |
0.1 | — | — | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Profit/(loss) before income tax |
479.9 | (5.6 | ) | — | 474.3 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense |
52.5 | — | — | 52.5 | ||||||||||||
Profit/(loss) for the year |
427.4 | (5.6 | ) | — | 421.8 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
35.0 | 5.3 | — | 40.3 | ||||||||||||
Non-cash expenses other than depreciation |
31.9 | — | — | 31.9 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditure |
101.1 | 5.3 | — | 106.4 | ||||||||||||
Investment in joint ventures |
4.9 | — | — | 4.9 | ||||||||||||
Segment assets |
2,210.3 | 39.6 | (44.4 | ) | 2,205.5 | |||||||||||
Segment liabilities |
351.4 | 64.1 | (9.9 | ) | 405.7 | |||||||||||
Inter-segment transfers or transactions are entered into under the normal commercial terms and conditions that would also be available to unrelated third parties. | ||
Capital expenditure comprises additions to premises and equipment (Note 6) and intangible assets (Note 7). | ||
Reportable segments’ assets are reconciled to total assets as follows: |
IT Services | BPO | Elimination | Group | |||||||||||||
As at June 30, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||
Segment assets |
2,268.1 | 73.5 | (35.6 | ) | 2,306.0 | |||||||||||
Total assets as per the balance sheet |
2,268.1 | 73.5 | (35.6 | ) | 2,306.0 | |||||||||||
As at June 30, 2007 |
||||||||||||||||
Segment assets |
1,793.6 | 50.5 | 11.1 | 1,855.2 | ||||||||||||
Total assets as per the balance sheet |
1,793.6 | 50.5 | 11.1 | 1,855.2 | ||||||||||||
As at March 31, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||
Segment assets |
2,210.3 | 39.6 | (44.4 | ) | 2,205.5 | |||||||||||
Total assets as per the balance sheet |
2,210.3 | 39.6 | (44.4 | ) | 2,205.5 | |||||||||||
Geographical information | ||
Satyam’s business segments operate in five main geographical areas, even though they are managed on a worldwide basis. The home country of Satyam Computer Services, which is also the main operating company, is India. Satyam’s revenue is generated mainly within America, Europe, Asia Pacific and India. | ||
The revenues are attributable to countries based on location of customers. Non-current assets are based on the location of the assets. |
18
Revenue from external customers | Non-current assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended | As at | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter ended June 30, | March 31, | As at June 30, | March 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
America |
382.9 | 281.5 | 1,285.0 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
133.5 | 90.3 | 439.8 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Asia Pacific |
85.9 | 57.7 | 288.9 | 6.1 | 3.2 | 5.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
India |
19.1 | 12.8 | 68.5 | 285.5 | 202.4 | 253.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Rest of the world |
15.9 | 10.0 | 55.9 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
637.3 | 452.3 | 2,138.1 | 299.1 | 213.0 | 267.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
The non-current assets in the above table represent premises and equipment and intangible assets of each segment. |
6. | Premises and equipment |
Furniture, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computers | fittings | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Land and | and | and | Assets under | |||||||||||||||||||||
buildings | servers | equipment | Vehicles | construction | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
As at April 01, 2008 |
40.8 | 245.6 | 73.1 | 13.8 | 115.0 | 488.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Additions |
— | 4.8 | 6.9 | 1.3 | 23.5 | 36.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Disposals |
— | — | — | (0.3 | ) | — | (0.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Exchange difference |
(2.7 | ) | (16.7 | ) | (4.9 | ) | (1.0 | ) | (8.5 | ) | (33.8 | ) | ||||||||||||
As at June 30, 2008 |
38.1 | 233.7 | 75.1 | 13.8 | 130.0 | 490.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
As at April 01, 2008 |
5.2 | 207.0 | 51.1 | 5.3 | — | 268.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Charge for the year |
0.2 | 6.9 | 2.4 | 0.7 | — | 10.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Disposals |
— | — | — | (0.2 | ) | — | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Exchange difference |
(0.3 | ) | (14.0 | ) | (3.4 | ) | (0.4 | ) | — | (18.1 | ) | |||||||||||||
As at June 30, 2008 |
5.1 | 199.9 | 50.1 | 5.4 | — | 260.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Furniture, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computers | fittings | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Land and | and | and | Assets under | |||||||||||||||||||||
buildings | servers | equipment | Vehicles | construction | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
As at April 01, 2007 |
34.3 | 196.1 | 56.5 | 9.0 | 70.0 | 365.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Additions |
3.8 | 11.5 | 6.3 | 1.3 | (1.3 | ) | 21.6 | |||||||||||||||||
Disposals |
— | (0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (0.4 | ) | — | (0.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Exchange difference |
2.1 | 12.1 | 3.5 | 0.6 | 4.3 | 22.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
As at June 30, 2007 |
40.2 | 219.6 | 66.2 | 10.5 | 73.0 | 409.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
As at April 01, 2007 |
3.9 | 170.0 | 40.5 | 3.9 | — | 218.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Charge for the year |
0.2 | 5.7 | 1.7 | 0.5 | — | 8.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Disposals |
— | (0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (0.3 | ) | — | (0.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Exchange difference |
0.3 | 10.7 | 2.5 | 0.2 | — | 13.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
As at June 30, 2007 |
4.4 | 186.3 | 44.6 | 4.3 | — | 239.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
19
Furniture, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computers | fittings | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Land and | and | and | Assets under | |||||||||||||||||||||
buildings | servers | equipment | Vehicles | construction | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
As at April 01, 2007 |
34.3 | 196.1 | 56.5 | 9.0 | 70.0 | 365.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Additions |
3.8 | 35.1 | 12.2 | 6.0 | 39.9 | 97.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Disposals |
— | (0.5 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (1.8 | ) | (2.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Exchange difference |
2.7 | 14.9 | 4.5 | 0.6 | 5.1 | 27.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
As at March 31, 2008 |
40.8 | 245.6 | 73.1 | 13.8 | 115.0 | 488.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
As at April 01, 2007 |
3.9 | 170.0 | 40.5 | 3.9 | — | 218.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Charge for the year |
1.1 | 24.5 | 7.3 | 2.3 | — | 35.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Disposals |
— | (0.5 | ) | — | (1.2 | ) | — | (1.7 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Exchange difference |
0.2 | 13.0 | 3.3 | 0.3 | — | 16.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
As at March 31, 2008 |
5.2 | 207.0 | 51.1 | 5.3 | — | 268.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net book amount as at |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
33.0 | 33.8 | 25.0 | 8.4 | 130.0 | 230.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
35.8 | 33.3 | 21.6 | 6.2 | 73.0 | 169.9 | |||||||||||||||||||
35.6 | 38.6 | 22.0 | 8.5 | 115.0 | 219.7 |
Depreciation expense of US$9.0 (June 30, 2007: US$7.2 and March 31, 2008: US$31.4) charged in cost of revenue and US$1.2 (June 30, 2007: US$0.9 and March 31, 2008: US$3.8) charged in selling, general and administrative expenses. | ||
External commercial borrowing and working capital loan of Satyam BPO are secured against movable and immovable assets for the value of US$9.9 (June 30, 2007: US$11.0 and March 31, 2008: US$11.3) (Note 16). |
7. | Intangible Assets |
Goodwill | Software | Others | Total | |||||||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||||||||
As at April 01, 2008 |
32.0 | 28.4 | 0.9 | 61.3 | ||||||||||||
Additions |
25.0 | 1.8 | — | 26.8 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Exchange difference |
(3.0 | ) | (1.9 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (5.0 | ) | ||||||||
As at June 30, 2008 |
54.0 | 28.3 | 0.8 | 83.1 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated amortisation and
impairment |
||||||||||||||||
As at April 01, 2008 |
— | 13.7 | 0.1 | 13.8 | ||||||||||||
Charge for the year |
— | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.3 | ||||||||||||
Exchange difference |
— | (0.8 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (0.9 | ) | |||||||||
As at June 30, 2008 |
— | 14.1 | 0.1 | 14.2 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill | Software | Others | Total | |||||||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||||||||
As at April 01, 2007 |
39.6 | 21.5 | — | 61.1 | ||||||||||||
Additions |
— | 1.5 | — | 1.5 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments |
(13.4 | ) | — | — | (13.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Exchange difference |
2.3 | 1.4 | — | 3.7 | ||||||||||||
As at June 30, 2007 |
28.5 | 24.4 | — | 52.9 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated amortisation
and impairment |
||||||||||||||||
As at April 01, 2007 |
— | 8.1 | — | 8.1 | ||||||||||||
Charge for the year |
— | 1.2 | — | 1.2 | ||||||||||||
Exchange difference |
— | 0.5 | — | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
As at June 30, 2007 |
— | 9.8 | — | 9.8 | ||||||||||||
20
Goodwill | Software | Others | Total | |||||||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||||||||
As at April 01, 2007 |
39.6 | 21.5 | — | 61.1 | ||||||||||||
Additions |
3.2 | 5.3 | 0.9 | 9.4 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments |
(13.4 | ) | — | — | (13.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Exchange difference |
2.6 | 1.6 | — | 4.2 | ||||||||||||
As at March 31, 2008 |
32.0 | 28.4 | 0.9 | 61.3 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated amortisation
and impairment |
||||||||||||||||
As at April 01, 2007 |
— | 8.1 | — | 8.1 | ||||||||||||
Charge for the year |
— | 5.0 | 0.1 | 5.1 | ||||||||||||
Exchange difference |
— | 0.6 | — | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
As at March 31, 2008 |
— | 13.7 | 0.1 | 13.8 | ||||||||||||
Net book amount as at |
||||||||||||||||
54.0 | 14.2 | 0.7 | 68.9 | |||||||||||||
28.5 | 14.6 | — | 43.1 | |||||||||||||
32.0 | 14.7 | 0.8 | 47.5 |
Amortisation expense of US$1.1 (June 30, 2007: US$1.0 and March 31, 2008: US$4.3) charged in cost of revenue and US$0.2 (June 30, 2007: US$0.2 and March 31, 2008: US$0.8) charged in selling, general and administrative expenses. | ||
Impairment tests for goodwill | ||
Goodwill is allocated to Satyam’s cash-generating units (‘CGUs’) identified to the entities acquired by Satyam in the IT services segment. A summary of the goodwill allocation is presented below. |
As at June 30, | As at March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Citisoft Plc. (“Citisoft”) |
20.4 | 21.6 | 22.0 | |||||||||
Knowledge Dynamics Pte Limited (“KDPL”) |
2.8 | 3.0 | 3.0 | |||||||||
Satyam Technologies, Inc. (“STI”) |
3.7 | 3.9 | 3.9 | |||||||||
Nitor Global Solutions Limited (“Nitor”) |
2.9 | — | 3.1 | |||||||||
Bridge Strategy Group LLC. (“Bridge”) |
24.2 | — | — | |||||||||
54.0 | 28.5 | 32.0 | ||||||||||
8. | Investments | |
8.1. | Acquisitions | |
8.1.1. | Citisoft Plc. | |
On May 12, 2005, Satyam acquired a 75% interest in Citisoft Plc (“Citisoft”), a business and systems consulting firm located in the United Kingdom that has focused on the investment management industry since 1986. The acquisition, as accounted under Indian GAAP has not been restated pursuant to the application of business combinations exemption under IFRS 1. The consideration for the 75% equity interest in Citisoft aggregated to US$17.4 comprising of an initial consideration of US$14.3 (including direct acquisition costs of US$0.9) and deferred consideration (non-contingent) of US$3.1. Deferred consideration for the acquisition of the 75% equity interest was accounted for as part of the purchase consideration and classified as a current liability in the opening IFRS balance sheet as at April 01, 2006. This has been paid subsequently in June 2006. | ||
The group was also required to pay a maximum earn out consideration aggregating to US$3.9 in May 2007 based on achievement of targeted revenues and profits for the year ended April 30, 2007. Satyam expected a pay-out as at April 01, 2006 of US$3.9 and accordingly accounted for the expected pay-out as a liability with a corresponding adjustment to goodwill as at the opening IFRS balance sheet date of April 01, 2006. | ||
Satyam also had a call option and the minority shareholders had a put option to acquire / sell the balance 25% equity shares in two tranches — 12.5% on April 30, 2007 and 12.5% on April 30, 2008. The consideration payable for the first tranche of 12.5% equity shares on April 30, 2007 would amount to US$2.8 and a maximum earn-out consideration amounting to US$2.4 based on achievement of targeted revenues and profits. The consideration payable for the second tranche of 12.5% equity shares on April 30, 2008 would amount to US$2.9 and a maximum earn-out consideration amounting to US$3.7 based on achievement of targeted revenues and profits. However, with a written put on the balance 25% equity shares, Satyam Computer Services had effectively acquired 100% of Citisoft at the date of acquisition. Hence, in relation to the opening IFRS balance sheet as at April 01, 2006: |
• | Minority interest of US$1.0 recognized in Indian GAAP, in respect of shares subject to put has been derecognized on the date of business combination treating the shares as if they had been acquired by Satyam Computer Services as a part of the business combination. |
21
• | Consequently, goodwill is adjusted to the extent of the difference of US$10.8 between the minority interest and the fair value of put liability. Fair value of the put liability of US$11.8 represented the amount Satyam expected to pay on the date of business combination. |
Subsequently, the deferred consideration has been paid on June 30, 2007. Since the revenue and profit targets have not been achieved, the earn-out consideration to be paid on April 30, 2007 is no longer payable; accordingly the goodwill amount has been adjusted. | ||
On June 29, 2007, Satyam entered into an amendment agreement with the selling shareholders. In accordance with the amendment agreement, Satyam was required to pay a settlement consideration of US$3.5 in lieu of the outstanding deferred consideration and the difference between the settlement consideration and the outstanding deferred consideration has been recognised in the income statement. The outstanding earn-out consideration payable has been de-recognised and goodwill has been adjusted accordingly. | ||
Satyam was also required to fund an Employee Benefit Trust (“EBT”) formed by Citisoft for the purpose of providing additional incentive to employees to contribute to the success of Citisoft. Satyam was required to fund a maximum of US$3.4 and US$1.7 on April 30, 2007 and 2008 respectively, based on achievement of targeted revenues and profits. Under IFRS, contribution to EBT, since required for the purpose of providing additional incentive to employees to contribute to the success of Citisoft, has been considered as compensation for post-acquisition services and hence is in the nature of employee benefit expense. Pursuant to the application of mandatory estimates exception under IFRS 1, the group recognized a liability of US$1.4 on April 01, 2006 towards expected contribution to EBT with a corresponding adjustment to retained earnings. Further, Satyam Computer Services has recognized US$1.7 in the consolidated statement of income as part of cost of revenues in respect of the EBT contribution for the year ended March 31, 2007. Pursuant to the amendment agreement, the excess liability in respect of contribution to EBT has been de-recognised. |
8.1.2. | Knowledge Dynamics Pte Limited |
On October 01 2005, the group acquired the entire share capital of Knowledge Dynamics Pte Limited, Singapore, (“Knowledge Dynamics”), a data warehousing and business intelligence solutions provider. The acquisition, as accounted under Indian GAAP has not been restated pursuant to the application of business combinations exemption under IFRS 1. The consideration for this acquisition aggregated to US$3.3 comprising of initial consideration of US$1.8 (including direct acquisition costs of $11 thousand) and deferred consideration of US$1.5. The entire deferred consideration of US$1.5 has been paid in two tranches of US$0.8 and US$0.7 in March 2007 and June 2007respectively. | ||
Additionally the group was also required to pay a maximum earn-out consideration aggregating to US$1.1 and US$1.1 on April 30, 2007 and 2008 respectively based on the achievement of targeted revenues and profits from the date of acquisition up to April 30, 2007 and 2008 respectively. The group expected a pay-out as at April 01, 2006 of US$2.2 and accordingly accounted for the expected pay-out as a liability with a corresponding adjustment to goodwill as at the opening IFRS balance sheet date of April 01, 2006. However the revenue and profit targets have not been achieved, therefore the earn-out consideration has been de-recognised and adjusted against goodwill. | ||
On July 19, 2007, the group entered into an amendment agreement with the selling shareholders. As per the amendment agreement, the group is required to pay US$0.7 to the selling shareholders in July 2007 and deferred payment of US$0.2 and a maximum earn out consideration of US$0.5 payable in May 2008 in lieu of the earn-out consideration payable in 2008. Satyam has paid US$0.7 in July 2007 and the difference between the settlement consideration and the outstanding deferred and earn-out consideration has been recognised in the income statement. During the quarter ended June 30 2008, a deferred payment of US$ 0.3 was paid. |
8.1.3. | Nitor Global Solutions Limited |
On January 04, 2008, Satyam acquired the entire share capital of Nitor Global Solutions Limited, United Kingdom (“Nitor”), and an IT professional consultancy Services Company engaged in assisting clients in managing infrastructure programs, liaison and communications, architecture, designing, planning and deploying Microsoft technologies. The total consideration for this acquisition aggregated to approximately US$5.6 including a performance-based payment of up to US$1.5 payable over two years conditional upon achievement of specified revenue and profit targets and a service based consideration of up to US$1.2 to be accounted on accrual. | ||
The purchase price was allocated as follows: US$0.8 to current assets, US$0.1 million to non compete agreement, US$0.6 million to customer contracts and relationships, US$0.2 million to internally developed technology, US$0.3 million deferred tax liability and the balance US$3.0 million to goodwill. The goodwill has been allocated to the IT services segment. |
8.1.4. | Bridge Strategy Group LLC. |
On January 21, 2008, Satyam Computer Services announced its intention of acquiring 100% of the shares of Bridge Strategy Group LLC, (“Bridge”) a Chicago based strategy and general management consulting firm for a total consideration of US$35.0 including a performance based payment of up to US$ 8.0 payable upon achievement of revenue and profit targets. The initial consideration of US$19.0 has been paid on April 04, 2008. A preliminary disclosure of the purchase price allocation is as follows: |
22
Details of net assets acquired and goodwill are as follows: |
Amount | ||||
Purchase consideration |
||||
— Cash paid |
19.0 | |||
— Deferred consideration |
8.0 | |||
Total purchase consideration |
27.0 | |||
Fair value of net assets acquired |
1.1 | |||
Goodwill |
25.9 | |||
The assets and liabilities as at April 04, 2008 provisionally determined arising from the acquisition are as follows: |
Acquiree’s | ||||||||
Provisional | carrying | |||||||
fair value | amount | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
0.2 | 0.2 | ||||||
Tangible assets |
0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||
Trade and other receivables |
4.0 | 4.0 | ||||||
Other assets |
0.4 | 0.4 | ||||||
Trade and other payables |
(3.6 | ) | (3.6 | ) | ||||
Net assets acquired |
1.1 | 1.1 | ||||||
Amount | ||||
Purchase consideration settled in cash |
19.0 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents in subsidiary acquired |
0.2 | |||
Cash outflow on acquisition |
18.8 | |||
8.1.5. | S&V Management consulting: |
On April 21, 2008, Satyam Computer Services announced its intention of acquiring S&V Management Consultants (“S&V”), a Belgium based SCM Strategy consulting firm, for a total consideration of US$35.5 comprising of an up-front, deferred guaranteed and deferred retention payments. |
8.1.6. | Computer Associate’s 50% stake in CA-Satyam JV: |
On April 21, 2008, Satyam Computer Services announced its intention of acquiring remaining 50% equity held by CA Inc in its joint venture CA Satyam ASP Pvt. Ltd. (“CA Satyam”) for a total consideration US$ 1.5 payable in two tranches. |
8.1.7. | Caterpillar’s business division: |
On April 21, 2008, Satyam Computer Services announced its intention to acquire the Market Research and Customer Analytics (MR&CA) business unit from Caterpillar Inc., USA (CAT), including the related Intellectual Property which consists of software, processes and know-how. The proposed acquisition is for a consideration of US$60.0 comprising of initial and deferred consideration. |
8.2. | Investments in joint ventures |
8.2.1. | Satyam Venture Engineering Services Private Limited |
On October 28, 1999, Satyam entered into an agreement with Venture Industries, USA (“Venture”) to form an equally held joint venture company Satyam Venture Engineering Services Private Limited. (“Satyam Venture”). Satyam holds 50% in Satyam Venture. The joint venture was formed on January 3, 2000 at Hyderabad, India. Satyam Venture is engaged in providing engineering solutions, software development and customization services specifically for the automotive industries worldwide. (Also refer Note 26(e)) |
8.2.2. | CA Satyam ASP Private Limited |
On December 29, 2000, Satyam entered into an agreement with Computer Associates International, Inc. (“CA”) to form an equally held joint venture company CA Satyam ASP Private Limited (“CA Satyam”). Satyam holds 50% in CA Satyam. The joint venture was formed in January 2001, in Mumbai, India. As per the agreement, both Satyam Computer Services and CA have invested US$1.5 each in the joint venture. (Also refer Note 29(b)) | ||
Satyam has made an accounting policy decision of accounting for investment in joint ventures using equity method in the accounts prepared under IFRS. |
23
The carrying values of Satyam’s investments in joint ventures as at June 30, 2008 and 2007 and as at March 31, 2008 are as shown below: |
Quarter ended June 30, | Year ended March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Beginning of year |
4.9 | 4.8 | 4.8 | |||||||||
Share of post tax profits |
0.1 | 0.0 | * | 0.1 | ||||||||
Exchange differences |
— | — | — | |||||||||
End of year |
5.0 | 4.8 | 4.9 | |||||||||
* | Share of post tax profits/ (losses) amounts to US$(2.2) thousand. |
Satyam’s share of the results of its joint ventures, all of which are unlisted, and its aggregated assets and liabilities, are as follows: |
Profit | %interest | |||||||||||||||||||
Name | Assets | Liabilities | Revenues | After tax | held | |||||||||||||||
Satyam Venture |
9.4 | (5.6 | ) | 2.9 | 0.2 | 50 | % | |||||||||||||
CA Satyam |
1.4 | (0.2 | ) | 0.1 | (0.1 | ) | 50 | % | ||||||||||||
10.8 | (5.8 | ) | 3.0 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Satyam Venture |
6.2 | (2.8 | ) | 2.0 | — | 50 | % | |||||||||||||
CA Satyam |
1.6 | (0.2 | ) | 0.1 | — | 50 | % | |||||||||||||
7.8 | (3.0 | ) | 2.1 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Satyam Venture |
7.2 | (3.7 | ) | 8.8 | — | 50 | % | |||||||||||||
CA Satyam |
1.7 | (0.3 | ) | 1.2 | 0.1 | 50 | % | |||||||||||||
8.9 | (4.0 | ) | 10.0 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||
9. | Financial instruments by category |
The accounting policies for financial instruments have been applied to the line items below: |
Assets at fair | ||||||||||||||||
value through | ||||||||||||||||
Loans and | the profit | Available | ||||||||||||||
June 30, 2008 | receivables | And loss | For sale | Total | ||||||||||||
Assets as per balance sheet |
||||||||||||||||
Investments in non-marketable
equity securities |
— | — | 3.7 | 3.7 | ||||||||||||
— Accumulated impairment |
— | — | (3.7 | ) | (3.7 | ) | ||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Trade and other receivables |
666.2 | — | — | 666.2 | ||||||||||||
Investments in bank deposits |
846.3 | — | — | 846.3 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
351.4 | — | — | 351.4 | ||||||||||||
1,863.9 | — | — | 1,863.9 | |||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||
financial | ||||||||
June 30, 2008 | liabilities | Total | ||||||
Liabilities as per balance sheet |
||||||||
Borrowings |
50.3 | 50.3 | ||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
— | — | ||||||
50.3 | 50.3 | |||||||
Assets at fair | ||||||||||||||||
value through | ||||||||||||||||
Loans and | the profit | Available | ||||||||||||||
June 30, 2007 | receivables | and loss | for sale | Total | ||||||||||||
Assets as per balance sheet |
||||||||||||||||
Investments in non-marketable
equity securities |
— | — | 3.9 | 3.9 | ||||||||||||
— Accumulated impairment |
— | — | (3.9 | ) | (3.9 | ) | ||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
— | 2.3 | — | 2.3 | ||||||||||||
Trade and other receivables |
502.3 | — | — | 502.3 | ||||||||||||
Investments in bank deposits |
844.0 | — | — | 844.0 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
187.5 | — | — | 187.5 | ||||||||||||
1,533.8 | 2.3 | — | 1,536.1 | |||||||||||||
24
June 30, 2007 | Other financial liabilities |
Total | ||||||
Liabilities as per balance sheet |
||||||||
Preference shares |
||||||||
Borrowings |
44.1 | 44.1 | ||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
— | — | ||||||
44.1 | 44.1 | |||||||
Assets at fair | ||||||||||||||||
value through | ||||||||||||||||
Loans and | the profit | Available | ||||||||||||||
March 31, 2008 | receivables | and loss | for sale | Total | ||||||||||||
Assets as per balance sheet |
||||||||||||||||
Investments in non-marketable
equity securities |
— | — | 3.9 | 3.9 | ||||||||||||
— Accumulated impairment |
— | — | (3.9 | ) | (3.9 | ) | ||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
— | 0.3 | — | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
Trade and other receivables |
625.8 | — | — | 625.8 | ||||||||||||
Investments in bank deposits |
894.8 | — | — | 894.8 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
290.5 | — | — | 290.5 | ||||||||||||
1,811.1 | 0.3 | — | 1,811.4 | |||||||||||||
Other financial |
||||||||
March 31, 2008 | liabilities | Total | ||||||
Liabilities as per balance sheet |
||||||||
Preference shares |
— | — | ||||||
Borrowings |
54.1 | 54.1 | ||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
— | — | ||||||
54.1 | 54.1 | |||||||
The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents, trade and other receivables, amounts due to or from related parties, accounts payable and other liabilities approximate their respective fair values due to their short maturity. | ||
Interest accrued on investment in bank deposits aggregated to US$75.5 and US$28.7 for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and US$68.1 for the year ended March 31, 2008. |
10. | Deferred income tax |
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when the deferred income taxes relate to the same taxation authority. The offset amounts are as follows: |
As at June 30, | As at March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Deferred tax asset |
||||||||||||
— recoverable within 12 months |
22.8 | 18.2 | 23.1 | |||||||||
— recoverable after more than 12 months |
5.7 | 4.0 | 6.2 | |||||||||
28.5 | 22.2 | 29.3 | ||||||||||
Deferred tax liability |
||||||||||||
— recoverable within 12 months |
(3.3 | ) | (3.3 | ) | (3.7 | ) | ||||||
— recoverable after more than 12 months |
(7.8 | ) | (13.0 | ) | (8.0 | ) | ||||||
(11.1 | ) | (16.3 | ) | (11.7 | ) | |||||||
Deferred tax assets (net) |
17.4 | 5.9 | 17.6 |
The movement in deferred tax assets and liabilities during the year, without taking into consideration the offsetting of balances within the same tax jurisdictions, is as follows: |
25
Share of | Provision for | |||||||||||||||||||||||
profit | trade and | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement | from joint | other | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation | benefits | ventures | receivables | Others | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
(1.1 | ) | 19.6 | (0.6 | ) | 4.8 | (5.1 | ) | 17.6 | ||||||||||||||||
(Charge) / credit
to the income
statement |
0.1 | 1.2 | — | (0.2 | ) | — | 1.1 | |||||||||||||||||
(Charge) / credit
directly to equity |
— | — | — | — | (0.3 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Exchange differences |
0.2 | (1.4 | ) | — | (0.1 | ) | 0.3 | (1.0 | ) | |||||||||||||||
(0.8 | ) | 19.4 | (0.6 | ) | 4.5 | (5.1 | ) | 17.4 | ||||||||||||||||
(5.8 | ) | 12.6 | (0.5 | ) | 4.0 | (4.2 | ) | 6.1 | ||||||||||||||||
(Charge) / credit
to the income
statement |
(1.2 | ) | 0.6 | — | 0.1 | — | (0.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
(Charge) / credit
directly to equity |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Exchange differences |
(0.3 | ) | 0.7 | (0.1 | ) | 0.3 | (0.3 | ) | 0.3 | |||||||||||||||
(7.3 | ) | 13.9 | (0.6 | ) | 4.4 | (4.5 | ) | 5.9 | ||||||||||||||||
(5.8 | ) | 12.6 | (0.5 | ) | 4.0 | (4.2 | ) | 6.1 | ||||||||||||||||
(Charge) / credit
to the income
statement |
5.3 | 5.9 | — | 0.6 | (0.1 | ) | 11.7 | |||||||||||||||||
(Charge) / credit
directly to equity |
— | — | — | — | (0.4 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Exchange differences |
(0.6 | ) | 1.1 | (0.1 | ) | 0.2 | (0.4 | ) | 0.2 | |||||||||||||||
(1.1 | ) | 19.6 | (0.6 | ) | 4.8 | (5.1 | ) | 17.6 | ||||||||||||||||
During the year ended March 31, 2007 deferred tax liability of US$4.3 on gain on dilution of interest in Satyam BPO has been recognised and the same has been charged directly to equity. | ||
Satyam has not recognized deferred income taxes arising on income of Satyam Computer Services due to the tax benefit available to it in the form of exemption from taxable income, except to the extent of timing differences which reverse after the tax holiday period or unless they reverse under foreign taxes. However, Satyam Computer Services earns certain other income and domestic income, which are taxable irrespective of the tax holiday as stated above. | ||
Deferred income tax assets are recognised for tax loss carry-forwards to the extent that the realisation of the related tax benefit through the future taxable profits is probable. The group did not recognise deferred income tax assets of US$30.9, US$28.2 and US$30.0 on operating losses for tax purposes amounting to US$93.0, US$80.1 and US$81.9 as at June 30, 2008, June 30, 2007 and March 31, 2008 respectively on account of uncertainty in the timing of reversal of such deferred tax assets. These carry forward losses expire at various dates primarily over a period of 8 years in India and 20 years in other tax jurisdictions. | ||
Satyam has not provided for any deferred income taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries due to the losses incurred by them since their inception. These losses aggregated to approximately US$ 45.2 and US$41.3 as of June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and US$43.2 as at March 31, 2008. |
26
11. | Trade and other receivables |
As at June 30, | As at March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Current |
||||||||||||
Trade receivables |
577.9 | 434.4 | 539.6 | |||||||||
Other receivables |
77.6 | 73.2 | 86.0 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses |
10.4 | 8.0 | 11.2 | |||||||||
665.9 | 515.6 | 636.8 | ||||||||||
Provision for impairment of trade and other receivables |
(39.1 | ) | (31.1 | ) | (38.0 | ) | ||||||
626.8 | 484.5 | 598.8 | ||||||||||
Non-current |
||||||||||||
Other receivables |
49.8 | 25.8 | 38.2 | |||||||||
Loans and advances |
— | — | — | |||||||||
49.8 | 25.8 | 38.2 | ||||||||||
676.6 | 510.3 | 637.0 | ||||||||||
Financial assets in trade and other receivables |
666.2 | 502.3 | 625.8 |
All non-current receivables are due within ninety nine years from the balance sheet date. | ||
Trade receivables that are due for less than six months are generally not considered impaired. In respect of trade receivables that are neither past due nor impaired, as at the reporting date, there are no indications that the customers will not meet their payment obligations. | ||
As at June 30, 2008, trade receivables of US$149.8 (June 30, 2007: US$103.1 and March31, 2008: US$246.8) were past due but not impaired. There are no indications that these customers will not meet their payment obligations. The ageing analysis of trade receivables which are not impaired is as follows: |
As at June 30, | As at March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Up to 6 months |
141.3 | 100.5 | 228.8 | |||||||||
more than 6 months |
8.5 | 2.6 | 18.0 | |||||||||
149.8 | 103.1 | 246.8 | ||||||||||
As at June 30, 2008, trade receivables of US$32.3 (June 30, 2007: US$25.2 and March31, 2008: US$31.0) were impaired and provided for. The amount of the provision was US$32.3 as at June 30, 2008 (June 30, 2007: US$25.2 and March 31, 2008: US$31.0). Trade receivables are tested individually for impairment. The ageing of these receivables is as follows: |
As at June 30, | As at March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
6 to 12 months |
2.4 | 1.4 | 2.0 | |||||||||
more than 12 months |
29.9 | 23.8 | 29.0 | |||||||||
32.3 | 25.2 | 31.0 | ||||||||||
The carrying amounts of thegroup’stradereceivablesaredenominatedinthefollowingcurrencies: |
As at June 30, | As at March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
US dollar |
341.3 | 271.0 | 315.0 | |||||||||
Other currencies |
204.3 | 138.2 | 193.6 | |||||||||
545.6 | 409.2 | 508.6 | ||||||||||
The creation and release of provision for impaired receivables have been included in ‘selling, general and administrative expenses’ in the income statement. |
27
Movements on the group provision for impairment of trade receivables are as follows: |
Quarter ended June 30, | Year ended March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
As at the beginning of the year |
31.0 | 22.9 | 22.9 | |||||||||
Provision for impairment |
4.8 | 1.4 | 8.5 | |||||||||
Provision no longer required on account of amounts recovered |
(1.5 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (2.3 | ) | ||||||
Change due to foreign currency fluctuation |
(2.0 | ) | 1.4 | 1.9 | ||||||||
As at the closing of the year |
32.3 | 25.2 | 31.0 | |||||||||
Movements on the group provision for impairment of other receivables are as follows: |
Quarter ended June 30, | Year ended March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
As at the beginning of the year |
7.0 | 5.4 | 5.4 | |||||||||
Provision for impairment |
0.4 | 0.2 | 1.2 | |||||||||
Change due to foreign currency fluctuation |
(0.6 | ) | 0.3 | 0.4 | ||||||||
As at the closing of the year |
6.8 | 5.9 | 7.0 | |||||||||
The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the fair value of each class of receivable mentioned above. The group does not hold any collateral as security. | ||
Export packing credit and bank over draft of Satyam BPO are secured against trade receivables for the value of US$30.1 as at June 30, 2008 June 30, 2007: US$12.0 and March 31, 2008: US$27.8) (Note16). |
12. | Cash and cash equivalents |
Cash and cash equivalents consist of: |
As at June 30, | As at March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Cash in hand and at bank |
351.4 | 187.5 | 290.5 | |||||||||
351.4 | 187.5 | 290.5 | ||||||||||
13. | Share capital |
As at June 30, | As at March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Authorised capital |
||||||||||||
800,000,000 ordinary shares of Rs.2 (US$0.05*) per share |
38.1 | 38.4 | 38.6 |
* | The par value in US$ has been derived based on the closing rate as at June 30, 2008(1US$=Rs.42.93). |
As at June 30, 2008, 130,589,508 ordinary shares (June 30, 2007:130,245,596 and March 31, 2008:130,490,460 ordinary shares) of Rs.2 (US$0.05) each fully paid-up represent 65,302,474 American depository shares (June 30, 2007:65,122,798 and March 31, 2008:65,245,230 American depository shares). | ||
Stock Split (in the form of stock dividend) | ||
On August 21, 2006 the share holders of Satyam approved a two-for-one stock split (in the form of stock dividend) which was effective on October10, 2006. Consequently, Satyam capitalized an amount of US$17.7 from its retained earnings to common stock. All references in the interim financial statements to number of shares, per share amounts, stock option data, and market prices of Satyam’s equity shares have been stated to reflect the stock split unless other wise noted. | ||
14. | Share-based payments | |
Associate Stock Option Plan | ||
In May 1998, Satyam established its Associate Stock Option Plan (the “ASOP plan”), which provided for the issue of 26,000,000 shares, as adjusted, to eligible associates. Satyam issued warrants to purchase these shares to a controlled associate welfare trust called the Satyam Associate Trust (the “SC-Trust”). In December 1999, the SC-Trust exercised all its warrants to purchase Satyam Computer Services shares prior to the stock split using the proceeds obtained from bank loans. The warrants vest immediately or vest over a period ranging from one to three years. Upon vesting, associates have 30 days in which to exercise these warrants. As at June 30, 2008, warrants (net of lapsed and forfeited) to purchase 24,152,720 equity shares have been granted to associates pursuant to ASOP since inception. | ||
The SC-Trust, which purchases and holds ordinary shares of Satyam Computer Services (treasury shares) in connection with employee share-based payment schemes, is consolidated in Satyam’s financial statements. Any consideration paid or received by SC-Trust is accounted as detailed in Note2.14. | ||
Associate Stock Option Plan B |
28
In April l2000, Satyam established its Associate Stock Option Plan B (the “ASOP B”) and reserved warrants for 83,454,280 shares to be issued to eligible associates with the intention to issue the warrants at the market price of the underlying equity shares on the date of the grant. These warrants vest over a period ranging from two to four years, starting with 20% in second year, 30% in the third year and 50% in the fourth year. Upon vesting, associates have 5 years to exercise these warrants. As at June 30, 2008, options (net of lapsed and forfeited) to purchase 53, 264, 538 equity shares have been granted to associates under this plan since inception. | ||
Associate Stock Option Plan—ADS | ||
In May 2000, Satyam established its Associate Stock Option Plan (ADS) (the ‘ASOP(ADS)’ ) to be administered by the Administrator of the ASOP (ADS) which is a committee appointed by the Board of Directors of Satyam and reserved 5,149,330 ADSs (10,298,660 shares) to be issued to eligible associates with the intention to issue the options at a price per option which is not less than 90% of the value of one ADS as reported on NYSE on the date of grant converted into Indian Rupees at the rate of exchange prevailing on the grant date. These options vest over a period of 1-10 years from the grant date. As at June 30, 2008, options (net of lapsed and forfeited) for 3,178,352 ADSs representing 6,356,696 equity shares have been granted to associates under the ASOP ADS since inception. | ||
Associate Stock Option Plan—Restricted Stock Units (ASOP—RSUs) | ||
During the Year ended March 31, 2007, the group has established a scheme “Associate Stock Option Plan—Restricted Stock Units (ASOP—RSUs)” to be administered by the Administrator of the ASOP—RSUs, a committee appointed by the Board of Directors of the Company. Under the scheme 13 million equity shares are reserved to be issued to eligible associates at a price to be determined by the Administrator which shall not be less than the face value of the share. ASOP RSUs vest over a period of 1-4 years from the date of the grant. Upon vesting, associates have 5 years in which to exercise these options. As at June 30, 2008, options (net of lapsed and forfeited) for 3,366,661 shares have been granted under the ASOP—RSUs since inception. | ||
Associate Stock Option Plan—RSUs (ADS) (ASOP—RSUs (ADS)) | ||
During the Year ended March 31, 2007, Satyam Computer Services has established a scheme “Associate Stock Option Plan—RSUs (ADS)” to be administered by the Administrator of the ASOP—RSUs (ADS), a committee appointed by the Board of Directors of the Company. Under the scheme 13 million equity shares minus the number of shares issued from time to time under the Associate Stock Option Plan—RSUs are reserved to be issued to eligible associates at a price to be determined by the Administrator not less than the face value of the share. These RSUs vest over a period of 1-4 years from the date of the grant. Upon vesting, associates have 5 years in which to exercise these options. As at June 30, 2008, options (net of lapsed) for 287,187 ADS representing 578,920 shares have been granted under the ASOP—RSUs (ADS) since inception. | ||
Stock based compensation plan of a subsidiary of Satyam | ||
In April 2004, Satyam BPO established its Employee Stock Option Plan (the “ESOP”). As per the ESOP, the options were granted at fair value as on the date of the grant and hence no compensation cost has been recognized. These options vest starting with 33.33% at the end of the second year, 33.33% at the end of the third year and remaining 33.34% at the end of the fourth year from the date of grant. | ||
Changes in number of equity shares representing stock options outstanding for each of the plans were as follows: | ||
Associate Stock Option Plan |
As at June 30, | As at March 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
average | average | average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
exercise | exercise | exercise | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | price(US$ | Equity | price(US$ | Equity | price(US$ | |||||||||||||||||||
shares | per share | shares | per share | shares | per share) | |||||||||||||||||||
As at the beginning of
the year |
52,000 | 1.90 | 146,200 | 1.69 | 146,200 | 1.69 | ||||||||||||||||||
Granted |
323,000 | 2.01 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(96,900 | ) | 1.65 | — | — | (94,200 | ) | 1.69 | ||||||||||||||||
Forfeited |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Lapsed |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
As at the end of the year |
278,100 | 2.11 | 146,200 | 1.79 | 52,000 | 2.04 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercisable at the end
of the year |
— | — | — | — | — | — |
29
Associate Stock Option Plan B |
As at June 30, | As at March 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity shares |
Weighted average exercise price (US$ per share |
Equity shares |
Weighted average exercise price (US$ per share |
Equity shares |
Weighted average exercise price(US$ per share) |
|||||||||||||||||||
As at the beginning of
the year |
15,641,127 | 4.18 | 19,976,210 | 3.89 | 19,976,210 | 3.89 | ||||||||||||||||||
Granted |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(1,763,675 | ) | 3.99 | (438,390 | ) | 4.13 | (2,866,407 | ) | 4.04 | |||||||||||||||
Forfeited |
(150,467 | ) | 4.24 | (420,643 | ) | 4.34 | (1,424,297 | ) | 4.49 | |||||||||||||||
Lapsed |
— | — | — | — | (44,379 | ) | 5.79 | |||||||||||||||||
As at the end of the year |
13,726,985 | 3.88 | 19,117,177 | 4.12 | 15,641,127 | 4.18 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercisable at the end
of the year |
12,063,309 | 4.05 | 10,917,427 | 4.16 | 10,429,602 | 4.32 |
Associate Stock Option Plan—ADS |
As at June 30, | As at March 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity shares |
Weighted average exercise price(US$ per share |
Equity shares |
Weighted average exercise price(US$ per share) |
Equity shares |
Weighted average exercise price(US$ per share) |
|||||||||||||||||||
As at the beginning of
the year |
2,566,236 | 5.36 | 2,922,128 | 4.89 | 2,922,128 | 4.89 | ||||||||||||||||||
Granted |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(87,762 | ) | 3.15 | (36,124 | ) | 3.13 | (280,988 | ) | 3.57 | |||||||||||||||
Forfeited |
— | — | (6,112 | ) | 5.58 | (73,424 | ) | 8.12 | ||||||||||||||||
Lapsed |
— | — | — | — | (1,480 | ) | 2.94 | |||||||||||||||||
As at the end of the year |
2,478,474 | 5.06 | 2,879,892 | 5.21 | 2,566,236 | 5.36 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercisable at the end
of the year |
2,296,142 | 4.68 | 2,264,516 | 4.55 | 2,180,892 | 4.84 |
Associate Stock Option Plan — Restricted Stock Units (ASOP—RSUs) |
As at June 30, | As at March 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity shares |
Weighted average exercise price(US$ per share |
Equity shares |
Weighted average exercise price(US$ per share) |
Equity shares |
Weighted average exercise price(US$ per share) |
|||||||||||||||||||
As at the beginning of
the year |
3,150,202 | 0.05 | 3,293,140 | 0.05 | 3,293,140 | 0.05 | ||||||||||||||||||
Granted |
61,500 | 0.05 | 25,000 | 0.05 | 159,000 | 0.05 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(166,504 | ) | 0.05 | — | — | (120,449 | ) | 0.05 | ||||||||||||||||
Forfeited |
(34,510 | ) | 0.05 | — | — | (181,489 | ) | 0.05 | ||||||||||||||||
Lapsed |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
As at the end of the year |
3,010,688 | 0.05 | 3,318,140 | 0.05 | 3,150,202 | 0.05 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercisable at the end
of the year |
505,459 | 0.05 | — | — | 662,107 | 0.05 |
30
Associate Stock Option Plan—RSUs (ADS) (ASOP—RSUs (ADS)) |
As at June 30, | As at March 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
average | average | average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
exercise | exercise | exercise | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | price (US$ | Equity | price (US$ | Equity | price (US$ | |||||||||||||||||||
shares | per share) | shares | per share) | shares | per share) | |||||||||||||||||||
As at the beginning of the year |
499,430 | 0.05 | 473,240 | 0.05 | 473,240 | 0.05 | ||||||||||||||||||
Granted |
59,500 | 0.05 | 35,000 | 0.05 | 87,000 | 0.05 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(11,286 | ) | 0.05 | — | — | (15,440 | ) | 0.05 | ||||||||||||||||
Forfeited |
(4,550 | ) | 0.05 | — | — | (45,370 | ) | 0.05 | ||||||||||||||||
Lapsed |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
As at the end of the year |
543,094 | 0.05 | 508,240 | 0.05 | 499,430 | 0.05 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercisable at the end of the year |
89,556 | 0.05 | — | — | 92,292 | 0.05 |
The options under the above plans were exercised on a regular basis through out the year. The weighted average price of one equity share of Satyam Computer Services on NSE on exercise dates was Rs. 476.82 (equivalent US$11.1) and Rs. 460.89 (equivalent US$11.36) for the quarter ended June 30,2008 and 2007 respectively and was Rs. 413.43 (equivalent US$10.3) during the year ended March 31,2008. The weighted average ADS (representing two equity shares) price of Satyam Computer Services on NYSE on exercise dates was US$26.39 and US$24.81 for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and US$24.73 during the year ended March 31, 2008. | ||
Stock based compensation plan of Satyam BPO |
As at June 30, | As at March 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
average | average | average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
exercise | exercise | exercise | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | price (US$ | Equity | price (US$ | Equity | price (US$ | |||||||||||||||||||
shares | per share) | shares | per share) | shares | per share) | |||||||||||||||||||
As at the beginning of the year |
639,750 | 2.00 | 998,702 | 1.86 | 998,702 | 1.86 | ||||||||||||||||||
Granted |
— | — | — | 1.77 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercised |
— | — | — | — | (358,952 | ) | 2.02 | |||||||||||||||||
Forfeited |
— | — | — | 1.77 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Lapsed |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
As at the end of the year |
639,750 | 1.86 | 998,702 | 1.97 | 639,750 | 2.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercisable at the end of the year |
— | — | — | — | — | — |
During the year ended March 31, 2008, an Employee Stock Option Exercises and Share Transfer Agreement was entered into between Satyam Computer Services, Satyam BPO and certain employees of Satyam BPO holding vested options of Satyam BPO. Issue of shares by Satyam BPO consequent to the exercise of options by the employees, has resulted in a dilution of owner ship interest of Satyam Computer Services in Satyam BPO. The shares issued to the employees are at amounts per share higher than Satyam Computer Services average cost per share. | ||
Information in relation to Satyam Computer Services about number of equity shares representing stock options outstanding as at June 30, 2008: |
Outstanding | Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Range of | average | remaining | Equity shares | average | Equity shares | |||||||||||||||||||
Exercise Price | exercise price | contractual | arising out of | exercise price | arising out of | |||||||||||||||||||
(per equity share) | (per share) | life | options | (per share) | options | |||||||||||||||||||
Rs.2.00- |
$0.05 | Rs.2.31 | Rs.2.30 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Rs.4.00 |
$0.09 | $0.05 | 6.28yrs | 3,553,782 | $1.05 | 595,015 | ||||||||||||||||||
Rs.61.49 |
$1.43 | Rs.107.74 | Rs.111.03 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Rs.141.57 |
$3.30 | $2.51 | 2.79yrs | 2,123,497 | $2.59 | 1,845,397 | ||||||||||||||||||
Rs.141.58 |
$3.30 | Rs.190.22 | Rs.189.45 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Rs.327.81 |
$7.64 | $4.43 | 3.70yrs | 12,762,752 | $4.41 | 11,099,076 | ||||||||||||||||||
Rs.327.82 |
$7.64 | Rs.508.93 | Rs.503.98 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Rs.716.06 |
$16.68 | $11.85 | 3.59yrs | 1,597,310 | $11.74 | 1,414,978 |
The numbers in US$ in the above tables have been translated using the closing exchange rate as at June 30, 2008 1US$= Rs 42.93 | ||
There are no grants with the exercise price in the range of Rs. 4.01-Rs. 77.32 (US$0.10-US$1.92). |
31
Satyam issues new shares to satisfy share option exercise. Cash received from option exercises aggregated to US$9.2 and US$1.1 for the Quarter ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and US$10.3 for the Year ended March 31, 2008. | ||
The weighted average fair value of options granted during quarter ended June 30,2008 determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model was US$11.5 per option (June 30, 2007: US$10.8 and March 31, 2008 : US$11.7 per option). The following table gives the weighted-average assumptions used to determine fair value: |
Quarter ended June 30, | Year ended March 31, |
|||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Weighted average share price on grant date |
$14.2 | $14.3 | $14.6 | |||||||||
Dividend yield |
0.78% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |||||||||
Expected volatility |
56.66% | 56.64% | 56.64% | |||||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
8.55% | 7.00% | 8.00% | |||||||||
Grant date expected term (in years) |
2.31 | 2.30 | 2.51 |
Expected term: The expected term represents the period that stock-based awards are expected to be out standing and was determined based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behaviour. | ||
Risk-free interest rate: The risk-free interest rate is based on the applicable rates of government securities in effect at the time of grant. | ||
Expected volatility: The fair values of stock-based payments were valued using a volatility factor based on the historical stock prices of Satyam Computer Services. | ||
Expected dividend: The Black-Scholes option-pricing model calls for a single expected dividend yield as an input. | ||
Estimated pre-vesting for features: When estimating forfeitures, Satyam Computer Services considers voluntary termination behaviour. Estimated forfeiture rates are trued-up to actual forfeiture results as the stock- based awards vest. | ||
15. | Preference shares issued by Satyam BPO | |
Satyam BPO issued 45,669,999 and 45,340,000 0.05% convertible redeemable cumulative preference shares of par value Rs.10 (US$0.23) per share in October 2003 and June 2004 respectively to Olympus BPO Holdings Limited and Intel Capital Corporation (“the investors”) at an issue price of Rs.10 (US$0.23) per share, in exchange for an aggregate consideration of US$20. | ||
As per the agreement, these preference shares were mandatory convertible into equity shares of Satyam BPO no later than June 2006, if Satyam BPO achieved certain targets for revenues and profits earned up to March 31, 2006. If these targeted revenues and profits were not achieved by Satyam BPO along with other triggering events, the investors had an option to either redeem these preference shares or convert them. Although certain triggering events for early redemption as per the agreement occurred during the period January 2004 to December 2004, the investors waived the right of early redemption. Further Satyam BPO did not achieve the targeted revenues and profit up to March 2006. If not converted, early converted or early redeemed, these convertible preference shares were redeemable on maturity in June 2007 at a redemption premium, which could range between 7.5% and 13.5% per annum. Satyam had guaranteed the payment of all sums payable by Satyam BPO to the investors on redemption of the said preference shares. | ||
On November 20, 2006, a Share Purchase, Redemption and Amendment Agreement (“SPRA Agreement”) was entered into between Satyam, the investors and Satyam BPO. Out of the total preference shares, fifty percent of the preference shares would be redeemed for US$13.6 at the target date on May 21, 2007 and the remaining fifty percent would get converted into equity shares of Satyam BPO based on the terms of the existing subscription agreement. Accordingly, Satyam BPO received a notice of conversion of fifty percent of preference shares into equity shares, from the investors, on December 01, 2006. In January 2007, 45,505,000 preference shares were converted into 6,422,267 equity shares of Satyam BPO. | ||
Further as per the SPRA Agreement, Satyam Computer Services agreed to purchase and the investors agreed to sell the said equity shares at an aggregate purchase price based on a formula. If the share purchase closing occurs on or before the share purchase target date (May 21, 2007) then the purchase price would range from a minimum of US$35.0 to maximum of US$45.0 and if an acceleration event occurs, the purchase price would equal US$45.0. If the share purchase closing occurs after the share purchase target date then the purchase price shall not be less than US$35.0 and if an acceleration event occurs, the purchase price shall not be less than US$45.0. This was subject to fulfilment of terms and conditions specified in the agreement. As at March 31, 2007 an acceleration event occurred. | ||
During the year ended March 31, 2008, Satyam Computer Services obtained the necessary approvals and a forward liability was recorded at US$46.5 with a corresponding adjustment to retained earnings. The additional consideration was on account of delay in transaction closing beyond the target date. The consideration paid to the investors was adjusted against the forward liability. |
32
16. | Borrowings |
As at June 30, | As at March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Current portion |
||||||||||||
Vehicle loans |
2.6 | 2.0 | 2.4 | |||||||||
Bank overdraft |
20.0 | 12.0 | 22.4 | |||||||||
Working Capital Loan |
6.4 | — | — | |||||||||
External Commercial Borrowings |
9.5 | — | — | |||||||||
Export packing credit |
5.9 | 6.3 | 4.3 | |||||||||
Interest accrued but not due |
0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | |||||||||
44.6 | 20.5 | 29.3 | ||||||||||
Non-current portion |
||||||||||||
Vehicle loans |
4.3 | 2.5 | 3.7 | |||||||||
Working capital loan |
1.4 | 10.6 | 10.7 | |||||||||
External commercial borrowings |
— | 10.5 | 10.4 | |||||||||
5.7 | 23.6 | 24.8 | ||||||||||
Total borrowings |
50.3 | 44.1 | 54.1 | |||||||||
Export packing credit and bank overdraft of Satyam BPO are secured by a charge on trade receivables. Working capital loan and external commercial borrowings of Satyam BPO are secured by a charge on movable and immovable assets of Satyam BPO. Satyam Computer Services has given a corporate guarantee to the bank on the above borrowings. | ||
Aggregate maturities of the borrowings are as follows: |
As at June 30, | As at March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
On demand or within one year |
44.6 | 20.5 | 29.3 | |||||||||
In one to three years |
5.5 | 19.0 | 24.6 | |||||||||
In three to five years |
0.2 | 4.6 | 0.2 | |||||||||
50.3 | 44.1 | 54.1 | ||||||||||
The carrying amounts of the group’s borrowings are denominated in the following currencies: |
As at June 30, | As at March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
US dollar |
9.5 | 10.5 | 10.4 | |||||||||
Indian rupees |
40.8 | 33.6 | 43.7 | |||||||||
50.3 | 44.1 | 54.1 | ||||||||||
17. | Retirement benefit obligation |
As at June 30, | As at March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Gratuity |
16.4 | 12.2 | 17.8 | |||||||||
Compensated absences |
41.5 | 29.2 | 40.4 | |||||||||
57.9 | 41.4 | 58.2 | ||||||||||
The amounts recognised towards gratuity in the balance sheet are determined as follows: |
As at June 30, | As at March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Present value of unfunded obligation |
16.4 | 12.2 | 17.8 | |||||||||
Amounts in the Balance sheet |
||||||||||||
— Liabilities |
16.4 | 12.2 | 17.8 | |||||||||
— Assets |
— | — | ||||||||||
16.4 | 12.2 | 17.8 | ||||||||||
The movement in the defined benefit obligation of gratuity over the period is as follows: |
Quarter ended June 30, | Year ended March 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Opening defined benefit obligation |
17.8 | 11.0 | 11.0 | |||||||||
Current service cost |
1.2 | 0.5 | 3.3 | |||||||||
Interest cost |
0.4 | 0.3 | 0.9 | |||||||||
Actuarial losses/ (gains) |
(1.6 | ) | — | 3.0 | ||||||||
Benefits paid |
(0.2 | ) | (0.3 | ) | (1.3 | ) | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes |
(1.2 | ) | 0.7 | 0.9 | ||||||||
Closing defined benefit obligation |
16.4 | 12.2 | 17.8 | |||||||||
33
The amounts recognised in the income statement in respect of gratuity are as follows: |
Quarter ended June 30, | Year ended March 31, |
|||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Current service cost |
1.2 | 0.5 | 3.3 | |||||||||
Interest cost |
0.4 | 0.3 | 0.9 | |||||||||
Actuarial loss |
(1.6 | ) | — | 3.0 | ||||||||
— | 0.8 | 7.2 | ||||||||||
Of the total charge related to gratuity, US$ Nil(June 30, 2007: US$0.6andMarch 31, 2008: US$5.8) and US$ Nil (June 30, 2007: US$0.2 and March 31, 2008: US$1.4) were included in ‘cost of revenue’ and ‘selling, general and administrative expenses ’respectively. | ||
The principal actuarial assumptions used were as follows: |
Quarter ended June 30, | Year ended March 31, |
|||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Discount rate |
8.95% | 8% | 7.5% | |||||||||
Long term rate of compensation increase |
7% | 7% | 7.0% | |||||||||
Mortality rates at various age-groups |
||||||||||||
18 years |
0.000919 | 0.000919 | 0.000919 | |||||||||
23 years |
0.001090 | 0.001090 | 0.001090 | |||||||||
28 years |
0.001166 | 0.001166 | 0.001166 | |||||||||
33 years |
0.001246 | 0.001246 | 0.001246 | |||||||||
38 years |
0.001721 | 0.001721 | 0.001721 | |||||||||
43 years |
0.002602 | 0.002602 | 0.002602 | |||||||||
48 years |
0.004243 | 0.004243 | 0.004243 | |||||||||
53 years |
0.007116 | 0.007116 | 0.007116 | |||||||||
58 years |
0.011025 | 0.011025 | 0.011025 |
18. | Trade and other payables |
As at June 30, | As at March31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Trade payables |
35.5 | 14.4 | 27.5 | |||||||||
Accruals |
92.4 | 49.1 | 83.0 | |||||||||
Other payables |
18.6 | 7.8 | 8.9 | |||||||||
146.5 | 71.3 | 119.4 | ||||||||||
34
19. | Expenses by nature |
Quarter ended June 30, | Year ended March 31, |
|||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Employee benefit expense (Note 20) |
376.1 | 270.0 | 1,317.2 | |||||||||
Travel costs |
39.5 | 37.9 | 153.6 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortisation |
11.5 | 9.3 | 40.3 | |||||||||
Legal and professional charges |
13.5 | 11.2 | 50.8 | |||||||||
Rent |
11.6 | 7.4 | 37.3 | |||||||||
Communication |
6.9 | 7.1 | 28.8 | |||||||||
Marketing expenses |
5.4 | 3.7 | 15.5 | |||||||||
Auditors’ remuneration |
0.2 | 0.2 | 1.0 | |||||||||
Other expenses |
35.6 | 15.1 | 82.1 | |||||||||
Total |
500.3 | 361.9 | 1,726.6 | |||||||||
Of which |
||||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
383.9 | 288.9 | 1,357.3 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
116.4 | 73.0 | 369.3 | |||||||||
Total |
500.3 | 361.9 | 1,726.6 | |||||||||
20. | Employee benefit expense |
Quarter ended June 30, | Year ended March 31, |
|||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Salaries and bonus |
343.2 | 244.4 | 1,185.5 | |||||||||
Defined contribution plans |
23.7 | 16.8 | 90.9 | |||||||||
Retirement benefit plans |
— | 0.8 | 7.2 | |||||||||
Staff welfare expenses |
3.4 | 1.3 | 6.6 | |||||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
4.3 | 5.9 | 23.0 | |||||||||
Fringe benefit tax |
1.5 | 0.8 | 4.0 | |||||||||
376.1 | 270.0 | 1,317.2 | ||||||||||
21. | Finance income and costs |
Quarter ended June 30, | Year ended March 31, |
|||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Finance income |
||||||||||||
— Interest on bank deposits |
16.2 | 16.4 | 67.4 | |||||||||
Finance cost |
||||||||||||
— Interest on borrowings |
0.6 | 0.1 | 3.8 | |||||||||
— Other finance charges |
0.7 | 0.7 | 3.2 | |||||||||
1.3 | 0.8 | 7.0 | ||||||||||
Net finance income |
14.9 | 15.6 | 60.4 | |||||||||
35
22. | Other Income |
Quarter ended June 30, | Year ended March 31, |
|||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Gains/(losses) on foreign exchange forward and option contracts |
(54.8 | ) | 22.1 | 9.0 | ||||||||
Miscellaneous income |
0.1 | 0.4 | 2.2 | |||||||||
(54.7 | ) | 22.5 | 11.2 | |||||||||
23. | Income tax expense |
Quarter ended June 30, | Year ended March 31, |
|||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Current tax |
15.3 | 11.5 | 64.2 | |||||||||
Deferred tax (Note 10) |
(1.1 | ) | 0.5 | (11.7 | ) | |||||||
14.2 | 12.0 | 52.5 | ||||||||||
The tax on Satyam’s profit before tax differs from the theoretical amount that would arise using the weighted average tax rate applicable to profits of the consolidated entities as follows: |
Quarter ended June 30, | Year ended March 31, |
|||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Net income before taxes |
143.1 | 107.1 | 474.3 | |||||||||
Enacted tax rates in India |
33.99% | 33.99% | 33.99% | |||||||||
Computed tax expense |
48.6 | 36.4 | 161.2 | |||||||||
Tax effect due to non-taxable export income |
(42.1 | ) | (27.1 | ) | (119.9 | ) | ||||||
Difference arising from different tax rates in other tax jurisdictions |
0.8 | 0.2 | 6.4 | |||||||||
Share-based compensation (non-deductible) |
0.5 | 0.2 | 0.9 | |||||||||
Losses of subsidiaries |
1.8 | — | 1.4 | |||||||||
Effect of tax rate change |
— | (0.1 | ) | 0.1 | ||||||||
Others |
4.6 | 2.4 | 2.4 | |||||||||
Income taxes recognized in the statement of income |
14.2 | 12.0 | 52.5 | |||||||||
The current provision for income taxes, net of payments, was US$39.1 and US$17.0 for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and US$30.0 for the year ended March 31, 2008. The foreign taxes are due to income taxes payable in overseas tax jurisdictions by offsite and onsite centres, principally in the United States. Satyam benefits from tax incentive provided to software entities as an exemption from payment of Indian corporate income taxes for a period of ten consecutive years of operations of software development facilities designated as “Software Technology Parks” (“STP units”). The benefit of this tax incentive has historically resulted in an effective tax rate for Satyam which is below statutory tax rates. In the case of the various registered STP units of Satyam Computer Services, these exemptions expire starting from fiscal 2006 through fiscal 2009. The subsidiaries in the Satyam group are subject to income taxes of the countries in which they operate. | ||
24. | Earnings per share | |
Basic earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Allocated but unvested or unexercised shares held by SC-Trust not included in the calculation of weighted-average shares outstanding for basic earnings per share were 278,100 and 146,200 as of June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and 52,000 as of March 31, 2008. Diluted earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares outstanding plus the effect of outstanding stock options using the “treasury stock” method. In addition to the above, the unallocated shares held by SC-Trust, which are by definition unvested, have been excluded from all earnings per share calculations. Such shares aggregated to 1,826,680 and 2,149,680 as of June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and 2,149,680 as at March 31, 2008. |
36
The components of basic and diluted earnings per share were as follows: |
Quarter ended June 30, | Year ended March31, |
|||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Earnings attributable to ordinary shareholders |
128.9 | 95.1 | 421.8 | |||||||||
Equity Shares (in million) |
||||||||||||
Average outstanding shares |
669.2 | 665.1 | 666.4 | |||||||||
Dilutive effect of Associate Stock Options |
12.4 | 14.4 | 13.0 | |||||||||
Share and share equivalents |
681.6 | 679.5 | 679.4 | |||||||||
Earnings per share |
||||||||||||
Basic |
0.19 | 0.14 | 0.63 | |||||||||
Diluted |
0.19 | 0.14 | 0.62 |
25. | Dividend distribution |
The directors are proposing a final dividend in respect of the year ended March 31, 2008 of US$0.06 (Rs.2.50) per share, which would reduce shareholders’ funds by US$49.4. The proposed dividend is subject to approval of the shareholders at the Annual General Meeting and has not been recognised as a liability in these interim financial statements. | ||
Cash dividend aggregating to US$68.3 and US$56.7 was paid to equity shareholders during the year ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 respectively. | ||
Dividends payable to equity shareholders are based on the net income available for distribution as reported in the stand-alone financial statements of Satyam prepared in accordance with Indian GAAP. As such, dividends are declared and paid in Indian Rupees. The net income in accordance with IFRS may, in certain years, either not be fully available or will be additionally available for distribution to equity shareholders. Under Indian GAAP, the retained earnings available for distribution to equity shareholders were US$1,505.8 and US$1,062.6 as at March 31, 2008 and 2007 respectively. | ||
Under the Companies Act, 1956 of India dividends may be paid out of the profits of a company in the year in which the dividend is declared or out of the undistributed profits of previous fiscal years. Before declaring a dividend greater than 10.0% of the par value of its equity shares, a company is required to transfer to its reserves a minimum percentage of its profits for that year, ranging from 2.5% to 10.0%, depending on the dividend percentage to be declared in such year. |
26. | Commitments and contingencies |
a) | Operating and finance lease commitments — Satyam as lessee |
Satyam has certain operating leases for land, office premises and guesthouses. Rental expense aggregated to US$11.6 and US$7.4 for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and US$37.3 for the year ended March 31, 2008. | ||
Future minimum annual lease commitments for non-cancellable lease arrangements, including those leases for which renewal options may be exercised, are as below. |
As at June 30, | As at March31, | |||||||||||
Operating lease commitments | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | |||||||||
Not later than 1 year |
23.0 | 5.3 | 17.5 | |||||||||
Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years |
77.3 | 3.6 | 68.3 | |||||||||
Later than 5 years |
9.6 | 0.6 | 13.3 | |||||||||
109.9 | 9.5 | 99.1 | ||||||||||
As at June 30, | As at March31, | |||||||||||
Finance lease commitments | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | |||||||||
Not later than 1 year |
0.6 | — | — | |||||||||
Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years |
3.5 | — | — | |||||||||
Later than 5 years |
0.8 | — | — | |||||||||
4.9 | — | — | ||||||||||
b) | Capital commitments |
Contractual commitments for capital expenditure pending execution are US$116.2 and US$48.4 as at June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and US$101.0 as at March 31, 2008. Contractual commitments for capital expenditures are relating to acquisition of premises and equipment. |
c) | Bank guarantees |
Bank guarantees outstanding are US$26.4 and US$23.8 as at June 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively and US$26.0 as at March 31, 2008. Bank guarantees are generally provided to government agencies, excise and customs authorities for the purposes of maintaining a bonded warehouse. These guarantees may be revoked by the governmental agencies if they suffer any losses or damage through the breach of any of the covenants contained in the agreements. |
37
d) | Claims against venturers—Venture Global Engineering LLC, USA |
Satyam Computer Services entered into a joint venture agreement with Venture Global Engineering LLC (“VGE”) to form Satyam Venture Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd (“SVES”) in India. As a result of VGE’s breach of the agreement between the parties, Satyam Computer Services filed a request for arbitration, naming VGE as respondent, with the London Court of International Arbitration (“LCIA”), seeking, among other things, to purchase VGE’s 50% interest in SVES at the agreed upon book value price of the shares. The LCIA Arbitrator issued an Award on April 3, 2006 in favour of Satyam Computer Services which it successfully enforced in the United States District Court in Michigan. During the enforcement proceedings in the US, VGE filed a petition challenging the Award before the District Court, Secunderabad and made an appeal to the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, both of which were rejected. Subsequently, in a special leave petition filed by VGE, the Supreme Court of India set aside the orders of the District Court and the High Court and granted an interim stay of the share transfer portion of the Award. The matter has been remanded back to the District Court, Secunderabad for trial on merits. Satyam believes that this will not have an adverse effect on results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. |
27. | Related party transactions |
a) | Transactions involving services |
Quarter ended June 30, | Year ended March 31, |
|||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Infrastructure and other services provided by Satyam to |
||||||||||||
Satyam Venture |
0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | |||||||||
CA Satyam |
— | — | 0.1 | |||||||||
0.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | ||||||||||
Infrastructure and other services received by Satyam from |
||||||||||||
Satyam Venture |
2.1 | 2.3 | 6.7 | |||||||||
CA Satyam |
— | — | 2.7 | |||||||||
2.1 | 2.3 | 9.4 | ||||||||||
b) | Key management compensation |
Quarter ended June 30, | Year ended March 31, |
|||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Salaries and other short-term employee benefits |
1.6 | 0.8 | 5.5 | |||||||||
Termination benefits |
— | — | — | |||||||||
Post-employment benefits |
— | — | — | |||||||||
Other long-term benefits |
0.1 | — | — | |||||||||
Share-based payments |
0.4 | 0.9 | 2.7 | |||||||||
2.1 | 1.7 | 8.2 | ||||||||||
c) | Quarter end/ year-end balances arising from transactions involving services |
As at June 30, | As at March31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Satyam Venture |
(1.8 | ) | (2.8 | ) | (1.8 | ) | ||||||
CA Satyam |
— | — | — | |||||||||
(1.8 | ) | (2.8 | ) | (1.8 | ) | |||||||
d) | Loans and advances to key management personnel |
Quarter ended June 30, | Year ended March 31, |
|||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||||||
At the beginning of the year |
— | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||||||||
Advances during the year |
0.2 | — | 0.1 | |||||||||
Repayments during the year |
— | (0.1 | ) | (0.2 | ) | |||||||
At the end of the year |
0.2 | — | — | |||||||||
Advances to the key management personnel are interest free advances. No provision has been required for such loans. |
38
This ‘6-K’ Filing | Date | Other Filings | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
4/1/10 | ||||
4/1/09 | ||||
Filed on: | 7/25/08 | |||
7/18/08 | ||||
For Period End: | 6/30/08 | |||
4/30/08 | ||||
4/21/08 | ||||
4/4/08 | ||||
4/1/08 | ||||
3/31/08 | 20-F | |||
1/21/08 | ||||
1/4/08 | ||||
10/1/07 | ||||
7/19/07 | ||||
6/30/07 | 6-K | |||
6/29/07 | ||||
5/21/07 | ||||
4/30/07 | 20-F | |||
4/1/07 | ||||
3/31/07 | 20-F | |||
12/1/06 | ||||
11/20/06 | ||||
8/21/06 | ||||
4/3/06 | ||||
4/1/06 | ||||
3/31/06 | 20-F | |||
5/12/05 | ||||
12/29/00 | ||||
1/3/00 | ||||
10/28/99 | ||||
List all Filings |