SEC Info  
    Home      Search      My Interests      Help      Sign In      Please Sign In

Hancock John Life Insurance Co – ‘10-Q’ for 3/31/05

On:  Monday, 5/16/05, at 1:51pm ET   ·   For:  3/31/05   ·   Accession #:  1171520-5-217   ·   File #:  1-31445

Previous ‘10-Q’:  ‘10-Q/A’ on 2/17/05 for 6/30/04   ·   Latest ‘10-Q’:  This Filing

Find Words in Filings emoji
 
  in    Show  and   Hints

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size              Issuer               Agent

 5/16/05  Hancock John Life Insurance Co    10-Q        3/31/05    5:198K                                   Elec Publishing Svcs Inc

Quarterly Report   —   Form 10-Q
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: 10-Q        John Hancock Life Insurance Co.                       54    337K 
 2: EX-31.1     Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 302)     2±     9K 
 3: EX-31.2     Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 302)     2±     9K 
 4: EX-32.1     Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)     1      6K 
 5: EX-32.2     Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)     1      6K 


10-Q   —   John Hancock Life Insurance Co.
Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page   -   Filing Submission
2Item 1. Financial Statements
4Revenues
27Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
30Benefit Plans
34General Account Investments
45Net investment income
52Forward-Looking Statements
53Item 4. CONTROLS and PROCEDURES
"Item 6. Exhibits
10-Q1st Page of 54TOCTopPreviousNextBottomJust 1st
 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q |X| QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 Commission File Number: 333-45862 JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Exact name of registrant as specified in charter MASSACHUSETTS 04-1414660 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) incorporation or organization) John Hancock Place Post Office Box 111 Boston, Massachusetts 02117 (Address of principal executive offices) (617) 572-6000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 3 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No |_| Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes |_| No |X| As of May 9, 2005 there were outstanding 33,000 shares of common stock, $10,000 par value per share, of the registrant, all of which were owned by John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. Reduced Disclosure Format Registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H(1) (a) and(b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form with the Reduced Disclosure Format.
10-Q2nd Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 2nd
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS [Enlarge/Download Table] March 31, December 31, 2005 2004 (unaudited) ------------------------------- (in millions) Assets Investments Fixed maturities: Available-for-sale--at fair value (cost: March 31--$46,321.4; December 31--$47,037.2) .. $46,532.0 $47,863.2 Equity securities: Available-for-sale--at fair value (cost: March 31--$441.1; December 31--$321.5) ........ 451.8 330.5 Trading securities--at fair value (cost: March 31--$4.3; December 31--$4.2) ............ 4.3 4.2 Mortgage loans on real estate ............................. 11,600.6 11,792.6 Real estate ............................................... 272.9 277.2 Policy loans .............................................. 2,018.4 2,012.0 Short-term investments .................................... 0.2 0.2 Other invested assets ..................................... 3,371.6 3,359.3 --------- --------- Total Investments ................................ 64,251.8 65,639.2 Cash and cash equivalents ................................. 666.8 1,073.3 Accrued investment income ................................. 787.1 683.0 Premiums and accounts receivable .......................... 93.7 67.2 Goodwill .................................................. 3,031.7 3,031.7 Value of business acquired ................................ 2,713.2 2,700.3 Deferred policy acquisition costs ......................... 317.7 181.4 Intangible assets ......................................... 1,346.1 1,348.5 Reinsurance recoverable ................................... 3,451.2 3,345.5 Other assets .............................................. 2,948.8 2,937.6 Separate account assets ................................... 18,370.5 18,753.0 --------- --------- Total Assets ..................................... $97,978.6 $99,760.7 ========= ========= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements. 2
10-Q3rd Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 3rd
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - (CONTINUED) [Enlarge/Download Table] March 31, December 31, 2005 2004 (unaudited) ------------------------------- (in millions) Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity Liabilities Future policy benefits .................................... $43,053.6 $42,962.8 Policyholders' funds ...................................... 18,137.6 19,385.8 Consumer notes ............................................ 2,456.0 2,379.1 Unearned revenue .......................................... 63.1 43.3 Unpaid claims and claim expense reserves .................. 171.3 187.8 Dividends payable to policyholders ........................ 435.1 441.3 Short-term debt ........................................... 96.4 137.7 Long-term debt ............................................ 568.2 577.6 Income taxes .............................................. 49.6 5.9 Other liabilities ......................................... 4,208.2 4,588.2 Separate account liabilities .............................. 18,370.5 18,753.0 --------- --------- Total liabilities ................................ 87,609.6 89,462.5 Minority interests ........................................ 5.1 5.1 Commitments and contingencies - Note 4 Shareholder's Equity Common stock, $10,000 par value; 33,000 and 1,000 shares authorized and outstanding at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively ........................ 330.0 10.0 Additional paid in capital ................................ 9,467.0 9,467.0 Retained earnings ......................................... 127.8 172.7 Accumulated other comprehensive income .................... 439.1 643.4 --------- --------- Total Shareholder's Equity ....................... 10,363.9 10,293.1 --------- --------- Total Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity ....... $97,978.6 $99,760.7 ========= ========= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements. 3
10-Q4th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 4th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME [Enlarge/Download Table] Predecessor Company Company ----------- ------------- Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 2004 -------------------------- (in millions) Revenues Premiums ............................................................ $ 490.4 $ 470.7 Universal life and investment-type product fees ..................... 165.4 176.8 Net investment income ............................................... 864.3 983.5 Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net of related amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, amounts credited to participating pension contractholders and the policyholder dividend obligation $(64.8) and $(72.5) for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively) ........ 157.3 (97.7) Investment management revenues, commissions and other fees .......... 136.3 132.4 Other revenue ....................................................... 63.5 71.2 -------- -------- Total revenues ................................................ 1,877.2 1,736.9 Benefits and Expenses Benefits to policyholders, excluding amounts related to net realized investment and other gains (losses) credited to participating pension contractholders and the policyholder dividend obligation $(60.8) and $(90.5) for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively) ..................... 903.7 935.3 Other operating costs and expenses .................................. 381.9 370.7 Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired, excluding amounts related to net realized investment and other gains (losses) $(4.0) and $18.0 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively) ........ 47.8 106.8 Dividends to policyholders .......................................... 118.1 116.6 -------- -------- Total benefits and expenses ................................... 1,451.5 1,529.4 Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change .. 425.7 207.5 Income taxes ........................................................... 150.6 49.9 -------- -------- Income before cumulative effect of accounting change ................... 275.1 157.6 Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax ..................... -- (3.3) -------- -------- Net income ............................................................. $ 275.1 $ 154.3 ======== ======== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements. 4
10-Q5th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 5th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME [Enlarge/Download Table] Accumulated Additional Other Total Common Paid in Retained Comprehensive Shareholder's Outstanding Stock Capital Earnings Income (Loss) Equity Shares ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in millions, except for outstanding share data in thousands) Predecessor Company ------------------- Balance at January 1, 2004..................... $10.0 $4,763.2 $1,332.1 $1,477.6 $ 7,582.9 1.0 Comprehensive income: Net income.................................. 154.3 154.3 Other comprehensive income, net of tax: Net unrealized gains (losses)............. 350.9 350.9 Net accumulated gains (losses) on cash flow hedges............................. 113.7 113.7 Minimum pension liability................. 0.5 0.5 --------- Comprehensive income........................... 619.4 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at March 31, 2004...................... $10.0 $4,763.2 $1,486.4 $1,942.7 $ 8,202.3 1.0 ============================================================================= Company ------- Balance at January 1, 2005.................... $ 10.0 $9,467.0 $ 172.7 $ 643.4 $10,293.1 1.0 Comprehensive income: Net income.................................. 275.1 275.1 Other comprehensive income, net of tax: Change in unrealized appreciation......... (262.8) (262.8) Net accumulated gains (losses) on cash flow hedges........................ 59.9 59.9 Foreign currency translation adjustment.............................. (1.4) (1.4) --------- Comprehensive income........................... 70.8 Contribution from parent company 320.0 320.0 32.0 Dividend paid to parent company (320.0) (320.0) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at March 31, 2005..................... $330.0 $9,467.0 $ 127.8 $ 439.1 $10,363.9 33.0 ============================================================================= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements. 5
10-Q6th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 6th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS [Enlarge/Download Table] Predecessor Company Company ----------- ------------- Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 2004 -------------------------- (in millions) Cash flows from operating activities: Net income ......................................................................... $ 275.1 $ 154.3 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Amortization of premium - fixed maturities ...................................... 158.4 11.4 Net realized investment and other (gains) losses ................................ (157.3) 97.7 Cumulative effect of accounting change .......................................... -- 3.3 Change in deferred policy acquisition costs ..................................... (71.2) -- Depreciation and amortization ................................................... 50.1 11.4 Decrease (increase) in accrued investment income ................................ (104.1) (50.6) Net cash flows from trading securities .......................................... (0.1) -- Decrease (increase) in premiums and accounts receivable ......................... (26.5) (9.4) Increase in other assets and other liabilities, net ............................. (145.2) (59.2) Increase in policy liabilities and accruals, net ................................ 426.9 356.4 Increase in income taxes ........................................................ 148.8 21.3 -------- -------- Net cash provided by operating activities ................................... 554.9 536.6 Cash flows from investing activities: Sales of: Fixed maturities available-for-sale ............................................. 1,547.5 1,849.2 Equity securities available-for-sale ............................................ 11.8 79.2 Real estate ..................................................................... 0.3 8.2 Short-term investments and other invested assets ................................ 162.6 79.5 Maturities, prepayments and scheduled redemptions of: Fixed maturities held-to-maturity ............................................... -- 35.7 Fixed maturities available-for-sale ............................................. 1,202.6 996.4 Short-term investments and other invested assets ................................ -- 24.7 Mortgage loans on real estate ................................................... 389.7 507.8 Purchases of: Fixed maturities available-for-sale ............................................. (2,414.0) (3,620.8) Equity securities available-for-sale ............................................ (141.2) (38.6) Real estate ..................................................................... (5.2) (2.4) Short-term investments and other invested assets ................................ (122.5) (291.8) Mortgage loans on real estate issued ............................................ (288.5) (309.2) Other, net ......................................................................... 5.3 (77.9) -------- -------- Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities ......................... 348.4 (760.0) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements. 6
10-Q7th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 7th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - (CONTINUED) [Enlarge/Download Table] Predecessor Company Company ----------- ------------- Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 2004 -------------------------- (in millions) Cash flows from financing activities: Universal life and investment-type contract deposits ............................. $ 797.3 $ 1,766.4 Universal life and investment-type contract maturities and withdrawals ........... (2,142.1) (1,978.1) Issuance of consumer notes ....................................................... 77.0 274.7 Issuance of long-term debt ....................................................... 0.3 0.2 Repayment of short-term debt ..................................................... (41.2) (37.9) Repayment of long-term debt ...................................................... (1.1) (0.9) --------- --------- Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities .......................... (1,309.8) 24.4 --------- --------- Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents .................................... (406.5) (199.0) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year ............................... 1,073.3 2,626.9 --------- --------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period ................................... $ 666.8 $ 2,427.9 ========= ========= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements. 7
10-Q8th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 8th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 1 -- Change of Control John Hancock Life Insurance Company, (the Company) is a wholly owned subsidiary of John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. (JHFS). Effective April 28, 2004, Manulife Financial Corporation ("Manulife") acquired all of the outstanding common shares of JHFS that were not already beneficially owned by Manulife as general fund assets and JHFS became a wholly owned subsidiary of Manulife (the "acquisition" or "merger"). The combined entity has a more diversified product line and distribution capabilities and expects to have improved operating efficiencies and a leading position across all its core business lines. Pursuant to the terms of the acquisition, the holders of JHFS common shares received 1.1853 shares of Manulife stock for each JHFS common share. Approximately 342 million Manulife common shares were issued at an ascribed price of CDN $39.61 per share based on the volume weighted average closing stock price of the common shares for the period from September 25, 2003 to September 30, 2003. In addition, all of the JHFS unvested stock options as of the date of announcement of the acquisition on September 28, 2003, vested immediately prior to the closing date and were exchanged for options exercisable for approximately 23 million Manulife common shares. The acquisition of JHFS's shares by Manulife was effected through the merger of JHFS with Jupiter Merger Corporation (Jupiter), a subsidiary of Manulife, which was organized solely for the purpose of effecting the merger with JHFS. Prior to the merger, Jupiter had a note payable to MLI Resources Inc., an affiliated Manulife entity in the amount of $260.7 million in consideration for previously purchased shares of JHFS, which were cancelled upon merger. The merger was accounted for using the purchase method under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141 "Business Combinations" and SFAS No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets". Under the purchase method of accounting, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at estimated fair value at the date of merger and these values were "pushed down" to the Company's financial statements in accordance with push down accounting rules. The Company is in the process of completing the valuations of a portion of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed; thus, the allocation of the purchase price is subject to refinement. The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets and liabilities recorded as of April 28, 2004: Fair Value ------------- (in millions) Assets: Fixed maturity securities.......................... $48,658.9 Equity securities.................................. 230.3 Mortgage loans..................................... 11,563.5 Policy loans....................................... 2,027.6 Other invested assets.............................. 3,423.8 Goodwill........................................... 3,031.7 Value of business acquired......................... 2,864.6 Intangible assets.................................. 1,352.0 Deferred tax asset................................. 436.4 Cash and cash equivalents.......................... 1,684.7 Reinsurance recoverable, net....................... 3,162.0 Other assets acquired.............................. 3,067.2 Separate account assets............................ 18,331.9 ------------- Total assets acquired..................... 99,834.6 Liabilities: Policy liabilities................................. 66,277.5 Other liabilities.................................. 5,748.2 Separate accounts.................................. 18,331.9 ------------- Total liabilities assumed................. 90,357.6 Net assets acquired................................ $ 9,477.0 ============= 8
10-Q9th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 9th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED) Note 1 -- Change of Control - (continued) Goodwill of $3,031.7 million has been allocated to the Company's business and geographic segments. Of the $3,031.7 million in goodwill, no material amount is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Value of business acquired is the present value of estimated future profits of insurance policies in force related to businesses acquired by Manulife, and has been allocated to the Company's business and geographic segments. Aside from goodwill and value of business acquired, intangible assets of $1,352.0 million resulting from the acquisition consists of the "John Hancock" brand name, distribution network, investment management contracts in the mutual funds business and other investments management contracts in the institutional investment advisory business. Refer to Note 7 -- Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets for a more complete discussion of these intangible assets. Restructuring Costs Prior to the merger, the Company continued its Competitive Positioning Project, which involved reducing costs and increasing future operating efficiencies by consolidating portions of the Company's operations. The Project consisted primarily of reducing staff in the home office and terminating certain operations outside the home office. Following the acquisition of the Company by Manulife on April 28, 2004, as previously discussed, Manulife developed a plan to integrate the operations of the Company with its consolidated subsidiaries. Manulife expects the restructuring to be substantially completed by the end of 2005. Restructuring costs of $85.1 million were recognized by the Company as part of the purchase transaction and consist primarily of exit and consolidation activities involving operations, certain compensation costs, and facilities. The accruals for the restructuring costs are included in other liabilities on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets and in other operating costs and expenses on the consolidated income statements. The following details the amounts and status of restructuring costs: [Enlarge/Download Table] Amount Utilized Amount Utilized Pre-merger January 1, 2004 April 29, 2004 accrual at through through Accrual at Type of Cost January 1, 2004 April 28, 2004 Accrued at merger December 31, 2004 December 31, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in millions) Personnel ....... $12.0 $ 3.3 $41.5 $ 9.6 $40.6 Facilities ...... -- -- 43.6 7.8 35.8 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total ........ $12.0 $ 3.3 $85.1 $17.4 $76.4 =================================================================================================== Amount Utilized January 1, 2005 Accrual at through Accrual at Type of Cost January 1, 2005 March 31, 2005 March 31, 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in millions) Personnel ....... $40.6 $ 4.0 $36.6 Facilities ...... 35.8 4.1 31.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total ........ $76.4 $ 8.1 $68.3 =============================================================================== 9
10-Q10th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 10th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED) Note 2 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Business John Hancock Life Insurance Company, (the Company), is a diversified financial services organization that provides a broad range of insurance and investment products and investment management and advisory services. The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of John Hancock Financial Services (JHFS). Since April 28, 2004, JHFS operates as a subsidiary of Manulife. The "John Hancock" name is Manulife's primary U.S. brand. Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, these unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of purchase accounting adjustments resulting from Manulife's acquisition of the Company, (see Note 1- Change of Control), as well as normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Company's financial position and results of operations. Operating results for the three month period ended March 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2005. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's annual audited financial statements as of December 31, 2004 included in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (hereafter referred to as the Company's 2004 Form 10-K). The Company's news releases, financial statements and other information are available on the internet at www.manlife.com. In addition, all of the Company's United States Securities and Exchange Commission filings including its financial statements are available on the internet at www.sec.gov, under the name Hancock John Life. The balance sheet at December 31, 2004, presented herein, has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. 10
10-Q11th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 11th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED) Note 2 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued) Stock-Based Compensation For stock option grants made to employees prior to January 1, 2003, the Company applied the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," which resulted in no compensation expense recognized for these stock option grants to employees. Prior to January 1, 2003 the Company recognized compensation expense at the time of the grant or over the vesting period for grants of non-vested stock to employees and non-employee board members and grants of stock options to non-employee general agents and has continued this practice. All options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted the fair value provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," the effect of which is to record compensation expense for grants made subsequent to this date. The following table illustrates the pro forma effect on net income as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to all stock-based employee compensation. [Enlarge/Download Table] Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 2004 -------- -------- (in millions) Net income, as reported ....................................... $ 275.1 $ 154.3 Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects ............ 1.2 3.4 Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards, net of related tax effects ........................................ 1.2 5.1 -------- -------- Pro-forma net income .......................................... $ 275.1 $ 152.6 ======== ======== In the merger all of the JHFS unvested stock options as of the date of announcement of the merger on September 28, 2003, vested immediately prior to the closing date and were exchanged for options exercisable for approximately 23 million Manulife common shares. In addition, substantially all outstanding grants of restricted stock as of the date of the announcement of the merger on September 28, 2003, vested immediately prior to the closing date. The Company granted approximately 29,000 shares of Manulife restricted stock subsequent to the merger. Subsequent to the merger the Company continues to incur compensation expense related to stock compensation issued by Manulife. Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change Statement of Position 03-1 - Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long Duration Contracts and for Separate Accounts On July 7, 2003, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee (AcSEC) of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issued Statement of Position 03-1, "Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long Duration Contracts and for Separate Accounts" (SOP 03-1). SOP 03-1 provides guidance on a number of topics unique to insurance enterprises, including separate account presentation, interest in separate accounts, gains and losses on the transfer of assets from the general account to a separate account, liability valuation, returns based on a contractually referenced pool of assets or index, accounting for contracts that contain death or other insurance benefit features, accounting for reinsurance and other similar contracts, accounting for annuitization benefits, and sales inducements to contractholders. The Company adopted SOP 03-1 on January 1, 2004, which resulted in a decrease in shareholders' equity of $1.5 million (net of tax of $0.8 million). The Company recorded a reduction in net income of $3.3 million (net of tax of $1.8 million) partially offset by an increase in other comprehensive income of $1.8 million (net of tax of $1.0 million) which were recorded as the cumulative effects of an accounting change, on January 1, 2004. In addition, in conjunction with the adoption of SOP 03-1 the Company reclassified $933.8 million in separate account assets and liabilities to the corresponding general account balance sheet accounts. 11
10-Q12th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 12th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED) Note 2 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued) Recent Accounting Pronouncements FSP 46(R)-5 - Implicit Variable Interests under FASB Interpretation No.46 (FIN46R- revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities In March, 2005, the staff of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 46(R) - 5, which requires the Company to consider whether it holds implicit variable interests in variable interest entities and potential variable interest entities, pursuant to determining if the Company is the primary beneficiary of any such entity. Implicit variable interests result when the Company may be indirectly exposed to expected losses of a variable interest entity, instead of, or in addition to, being directly exposed. FSP 46(R)-5 is effective for the Company on April 1, 2005. The Company is currently re-evaluating its relationships with variable interest entities and potential variable interest entities. Note 3 -- Segment Information As a result of Manulife's merger with JHFS, see Note 1 -- Change of Control, the Company renamed and reorganized certain businesses within its operating segments to better align the Company with its new parent, Manulife. The Company renamed the Asset Gathering Segment as the Wealth Management Segment. Further efforts at reorganization of JHFS included the movement of the Investment Management Segment to the Corporate and Other Segment. Other realignments include moving Signator Investors, Inc., the Company's agent sales organization, from Wealth Management to Protection, and group life, retail discontinued operations, discontinued health insurance operations and creditor from Corporate and Other to Protection. International Group Program (IGP) remains in international operations and John Hancock Accident (workers compensation insurance) remains in the non-core business in the Corporate and Other Segment while in Manulife's segment results IGP and John Hancock Accident will be reported in Reinsurance. The financial results for all periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. During the majority of 2004, the Company operated in the following four business segments: two segments primarily served retail customers, one segment served institutional customers and the fourth segment was the Corporate and Other Segment, which includes the institutional advisory business, the remaining international operations, and the corporate account. The retail segments are the Protection Segment and the Wealth Management Segment, previously called Asset Gathering. The institutional segment is the Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products Segment (G&SFP). In addition, in January 2005, the Company announced the transfer of the G&SFP Segment to the Wealth Management Segment with an intended focus on retail customers in the future. G&SFP is presented as its own operating segment for the discussion of results below. See below for a more detailed description of the Company's reportable segments. Prior to the merger, the Company operated in the following five business segments: two segments served primarily domestic retail customers, two segments served primarily domestic institutional customers, and the fifth segment was the Corporate and Other Segment, which included the remaining international operations, the corporate account and run-off from several discontinued business lines. The retail segments were the Protection Segment and the Asset Gathering Segment. The institutional segments were the Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products (G&SFP) Segment and the Investment Management Segment. For additional information about the Company's pre-acquisition business segments, please refer to the Company's 2004 Form 10-K. Subsequent to the merger, the Company changed its methodology for determining how much capital is needed to support its operating segments and redeployed capital according to the new methodology. As part of this process, the Company moved certain tax preferenced investments from the operating segments to the Corporate and Other Segment. These steps were taken as part of the alignment of the Company's investment and capital allocation processes with those of its parent, and they could have a material impact on each operating segment's investment income and net income in future periods. 12
10-Q13th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 13th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED) Note 3 -- Segment Information - (continued) The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 2 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Company's 2004 Form 10-K. Allocations of net investment income are based on the amount of assets allocated to each segment. Other costs and operating expenses are allocated to each segment based on a review of the nature of such costs, cost allocations utilizing time studies, and other relevant allocation methodologies. The following tables summarize selected financial information by segment for the periods and dates indicated. Included in the Protection Segment for all periods presented are the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the closed block. For additional information on the closed block see Note 5 -- Closed Block in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. [Enlarge/Download Table] Wealth Corporate Protection Management G&SFP and Other Consolidated ------------------------------------------------------------------- (in millions) As of or for the three months ended March 31, 2005 Revenues from external customers ................... $ 527.9 $ 116.2 $ 19.5 $ 192.0 $ 855.6 Net investment income .............................. 347.7 160.3 312.1 44.2 864.3 Net realized investment and other gains (losses) ... 24.2 (19.8) 151.9 1.0 157.3 Inter-segment revenues .......................... -- 0.3 0.1 (0.4) -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Revenues ........................................ $ 899.8 $ 257.0 $ 483.6 $ 236.8 $ 1,877.2 ================================================================= Net income ...................................... $ 122.2 $ 49.5 $ 128.4 $ (25.0) $ 275.1 ================================================================= Supplemental Information: Equity in net income of investees accounted for by the equity method ...................... $ 21.4 $ 5.6 $ 11.8 $ 8.2 $ 47.0 Carrying value of investments accounted for under the equity method ....................... 805.1 333.6 689.3 659.6 2,487.6 Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired, excluding amounts related to net realized investment and other gains (losses) ........... 21.7 18.3 7.8 -- 47.8 Segment assets .................................. $43,892.3 $19,563.3 $32,806.3 $ 1,716.7 $97,978.6 13
10-Q14th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 14th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED) Note 3 -- Segment Information - (continued) [Enlarge/Download Table] Wealth Corporate Protection Management G&SFP and Other Consolidated ------------------------------------------------------------------- (in millions) As of or for the three months ended March 31, 2004 Revenues from external customers ................. $ 561.4 $ 92.2 $ 15.6 $ 181.9 $ 851.1 Net investment income ............................ 370.1 177.7 401.8 33.9 983.5 Inter-segment revenues ........................... -- 0.3 0.1 (0.4) -- Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net ............................ (0.2) (7.0) (116.6) 26.1 (97.7) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Revenues ......................................... $ 931.3 $ 263.2 $ 300.9 $ 241.5 $ 1,736.9 ================================================================= Net Income .......................................... $ 83.2 $ 31.6 $ (5.7) $ 45.2 $ 154.3 ================================================================= Supplemental Information: Equity in net income of investees accounted for by the equity method ....................... $ 8.6 $ 3.0 $ 9.9 $ 41.2 $ 62.7 Carrying value of investments accounted for under the equity method ........................ 441.8 230.5 591.1 695.8 1,959.2 Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, excluding amounts related to net realized investment and other gains (losses) ... 65.4 41.1 0.5 (0.2) 106.8 Segment assets ................................... $38,180.3 $18,178.5 $36,520.2 $ 4,772.9 $98,651.9 14
10-Q15th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 15th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED) Note 4 -- Contingencies Guarantees. In the course of business the Company enters into guarantees which vary in nature and purpose and which are accounted for and disclosed under accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. specific to the insurance industry. The Company has no material guarantees outstanding outside the scope of insurance accounting at March 31, 2005. Contingencies. Through the Company's group health insurance operations, the Company entered into a number of reinsurance arrangements in respect to personal accident insurance and the occupational accident component of workers compensation insurance, a portion of which was originated through a pool managed by Unicover Managers, Inc. Under these arrangements, the Company both assumed risks as a reinsurer, and also passed 95% of these risks on to other companies. This business had originally been reinsured by a number of different companies, and has become the subject of widespread disputes. The disputes concern the placement of the business with reinsurers and recovery of the reinsurance. The Company is engaged in disputes, including a number of legal proceedings, in respect to this business. The risk to the Company is that other companies that reinsured the business from the Company may seek to avoid their reinsurance obligations. However, the Company believes that it has a reasonable legal position in this matter. During the fourth quarter of 1999 and early 2000, the Company received additional information about its exposure to losses under the various reinsurance programs. As a result of this additional information and in connection with global settlement discussions initiated in late 1999 with other parties involved in the reinsurance programs, during the fourth quarter of 1999 the Company recognized a charge for uncollectible reinsurance of $133.7 million, after tax. During 2004 and the first quarter 2005, the Company received additional information about its exposure and recognized additional charges of $92.4 million and $30.9 million, respectively, as its best estimate of its exposure as of March 31, 2005. Legal Proceedings. The Company is regularly involved in litigation, both as a defendant and as a plaintiff. The litigation naming it as a defendant ordinarily involves activities as a provider of insurance protection and wealth management products, as well as an investment adviser, employer and taxpayer. In addition, state regulatory bodies, state attorneys general, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. and other government and regulatory bodies regularly make inquiries and, from time to time, require the production of information or conduct examinations concerning compliance with, among other things, insurance laws, securities laws, and laws governing the activities of broker-dealers. As with many other companies in the financial services industry, the Company has been requested or required by such government and regulatory authorities to provide information with respect to market timing and late trading of mutual funds and sales compensation and broker-dealer practices, including with respect to mutual funds underlying variable life and annuity products. It is believed that these inquiries are similar to those made to many financial service companies by various agencies into practices, policies and procedures relating to trading in mutual fund shares and sales compensation and broker-dealer practices. Management intends to continue to cooperate fully with government and regulatory authorities in connection with their respective inquiries. Management does not believe that the conclusion of any current legal or regulatory matters, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition or results of operations. 15
10-Q16th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 16th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED) Note 5 -- Closed Block In connection with the Company's plan of reorganization for its demutualization and initial public offering, the Company created a closed block for the benefit of policies included therein. Additional information regarding the creation of the closed block and relevant accounting issues is contained in the notes to consolidated financial statements of the Company's 2004 Form 10-K. The following tables set forth certain summarized financial information relating to the closed block as of the dates and periods indicated. [Enlarge/Download Table] March 31, December 31, 2005 2004 --------------------------- (in millions) Liabilities Future policy benefits ................................................. $10,768.1 $10,759.5 Policyholder dividend obligation ....................................... 390.1 540.1 Policyholders' funds ................................................... 1,508.0 1,506.7 Policyholder dividends payable ......................................... 421.6 419.3 Other closed block liabilities ......................................... 96.2 64.4 ------------------------- Total closed block liabilities ...................................... $13,184.0 $13,290.0 ------------------------- Assets Investments: Fixed maturities: Available-for-sale--at fair value (cost: March 31--$6,587.3; December 31--$6,474.1) ................. $ 6,590.6 $ 6,585.6 Equity securities: Available-for-sale--at fair value (cost: March 31--$6.4 December 31--$7.0) .......................... 6.4 7.0 Mortgage loans on real estate .......................................... 1,617.2 1,662.0 Policy loans ........................................................... 1,535.0 1,534.3 Other invested assets .................................................. 332.8 324.3 ------------------------- Total investments ................................................... 10,082.0 10,113.2 Cash and cash equivalents .............................................. 74.3 142.9 Accrued investment income .............................................. 148.0 140.2 Other closed block assets .............................................. 323.6 317.2 ------------------------- Total closed block assets ........................................... $10,627.9 $10,713.5 ------------------------- Excess of reported closed block liabilities over assets designated to the closed block ...................................... $ 2,556.1 $ 2,576.5 ------------------------- Portion of above representing other comprehensive income: Unrealized appreciation (depreciation), net of tax of $(1.5) million and ($39.7) million at March 31 and December 31, respectively ...................................................... $ 3.6 $ 74.3 Allocated to the policyholder dividend obligation, net of tax of $1.9 million and $40.1 million at March 31 and December 31, respectively ...................................................... (3.6) (74.4) ------------------------- Total ........................................................... -- (0.1) ------------------------- Maximum future earnings to be recognized from closed block assets and liabilities .............................................. $ 2,556.1 $ 2,576.4 ========================= 16
10-Q17th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 17th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED) Note 5 -- Closed Block - (continued) [Enlarge/Download Table] March 31, December 31, 2005 2004 --------------------------- (in millions) Changes in the policyholder dividend obligation: Balance at beginning of period ...................................... $ 540.1 $ 400.0 Impact on net income before income taxes .......................... (41.0) (68.4) Unrealized investment gains (losses) .............................. (109.0) 0.1 Purchase Equation Fair value adjustment ........................... -- 208.4 -------------------------- Balance at end of period ............................................ $ 390.1 $ 540.1 ========================== The following table sets forth certain summarized financial information relating to the closed block for the periods indicated: [Enlarge/Download Table] Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 2004 ---------------------------- (in millions) Revenues Premiums .............................................................. $ 199.4 $ 209.3 Net investment income ................................................. 132.4 157.9 Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net of amounts credited to the policyholder dividend obligation of $14.9 million and $14.9 million, respectively ............................. 1.0 (1.1) Other closed block revenues ........................................... -- (0.3) ---------------------------- Total closed block revenues ......................................... 332.8 365.8 Benefits and Expenses Benefits to policyholders ............................................. 221.6 232.0 Change in the policyholder dividend obligation ........................ (26.7) (4.6) Other closed block operating costs and expenses ....................... (0.2) 1.4 Dividends to policyholders ............................................ 106.9 104.8 ---------------------------- Total benefits and expenses ......................................... 301.6 333.6 ---------------------------- Closed block revenues, net of closed block benefits and expenses and before income taxes ............................................. 31.2 32.2 Income taxes, net of amounts credited to the policyholder dividend obligation of $0.6 million and $0.6 million, respectively .. 10.9 11.2 ---------------------------- Closed block revenues, net of closed block benefits and expenses and income taxes .................................................... $ 20.3 $ 21.0 ============================ 17
10-Q18th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 18th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED) Note 6 -- Related Party Transactions The Company provides JHFS, its parent, with personnel, property, and facilities in carrying out certain of its corporate functions. The Company annually determines a fee (the parent company service fee) for these services and facilities based on a number of criteria, which are periodically revised to reflect continuing changes in the Company's operations. The parent company service fee is included in other operating costs and expenses within the Company's income statements. The Company charged JHFS no service fees for the three month period ended March 31, 2005 and $5.2 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2004. As of March 31, 2005, JHFS was current in its payments to the Company related to these services. The Company has service agreements with an affiliate, John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A) ("John Hancock U.S.A."), a subsidiary of the Manufacturer's Life Insurance Company, to provide and/or receive administrative services. For the period ended March 31, 2005, the Company was charged by John Hancock U.S.A. for net services received totaling $16 million. In addition, the Company and its subsidiaries received $15 million of commission revenues from John Hancock U.S.A. for the sale of insurance and variable annuity products. The Company provides certain administrative and asset management services to its employee benefit plans (the Plans). Fees paid to the Company by the Plans for these services were $1.2 million and $1.6 million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. During the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company paid $5.4 million and $19.0 million in premiums to an affiliate, John Hancock Insurance Company of Vermont (JHIC of Vermont) for certain insurance services. All of these were in Trust Owned Health Insurance (TOHI) premiums, a funding vehicle for postretirement medical benefit plans, which offers customers an insured medical benefit-funding program in conjunction with a broad range of investment options. The Company has reinsured certain portions of its long term care insurance, non-traditional life insurance and group pension businesses with John Hancock Reassurance Company, Ltd. of Bermuda (JHReCo), an affiliate and a wholly owned subsidiary of JHFS. The Company entered into these reinsurance contracts in order to facilitate its capital management process. These reinsurance contracts are primarily written on a funds withheld basis where the related financial assets remain invested at the Company. As a result, the Company recorded a liability for coinsurance amounts withheld from JHReCo of $1,579.6 million at March 31, 2005 and $1,529.0 million at December 31, 2004, which are included with other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and recorded reinsurance recoverable from JHReCo of $2,228.6 million at March 31, 2005 and $2,169.2 million at December 31, 2004, respectively, which are included with other reinsurance recoverables on the consolidated balance sheets. Premiums ceded to JHReCo were $124.0 million and $195.4 million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. During the year ended 2002, the Company began reinsuring certain portions of its group pension businesses with JHIC of Vermont. The Company entered into these reinsurance contracts in order to facilitate its capital management process. These reinsurance contracts are primarily written on a funds withheld basis where the related financial assets remain invested at the Company. As a result, the Company recorded a liability for coinsurance amounts withheld from JHIC of Vermont of $290.0 million at March 31, 2005 and $286.5 million at December 31, 2004, which is included with other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Company had not recorded any reinsurance recoverable from JHIC of Vermont. Reinsurance recoverable is typically recorded with other reinsurance recoverables on the consolidated balance sheet. Premiums ceded by the Company to JHIC of Vermont were $0.9 million and $0.3 million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company, in the ordinary course of business, invests funds deposited with it by customers and manages the resulting invested assets for growth and income for customers. From time to time, successful investment strategies of the Company may attract deposits from affiliates of the Company. At March 31, 2005, the Company managed approximately $39.4 million of investments for Manulife affiliates which to date generated market-based revenue for the Company. Prior to its merger with Manulife, the Company reinsured certain portions of its closed block with Manulife. During the fourth quarter of 2004, the Life Company entered into an additional agreement covering closed block policies with a Manulife affiliate. The Company entered into these reinsurance contracts in order to facilitate its statutory capital management process. Both the original and the revised reinsurance contracts are primarily written on a modified 18
10-Q19th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 19th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED) Note 6 -- Related Party Transactions - (continued) coinsurance basis where the related financial assets remain invested at the Company. The closed block reinsurance agreement is a financial reinsurance agreement and does not meet the risk transfer definition for U.S. GAAP reporting purposes. The agreement is accounted for under deposit accounting with only the reinsurance risk fee being reported on the consolidated statements of income. The Company's Consolidated Financial Statements do not report reinsurance ceded premiums or reinsurance recoverable. The Company's Consolidated Financial Statements report a risk fee that was paid to the Manulife reinsurance companies for the first quarter of 2005. This appears in other operating costs and expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income and was $0.4 million for the three month period ending March 31, 2005. On March 8, 2005, the Company issued 32,000 shares of Common Stock to its sole shareholder, JHFS, for consideration of $320.0 million. The transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Following notification to the Massachusetts Insurance Commissioner, the Company paid a $320.0 million dividend to JHFS on March 7, 2005. Note 7 -- Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets The Company recognized several intangible assets which resulted from business combinations during Manulife's merger with JHFS. See Note 1 -- Change of Control for additional discussion of the merger. Unamortizable assets include goodwill, brand name and investment management contracts. Goodwill is the excess of the cost to Manulife over the fair value of the Company's identifiable net assets acquired by Manulife in the recent merger. Brand name is the fair value of the Company's trademark and trade name acquired by Manulife in the recent merger. Investment management contracts are the fair values of the investment management relationships between the Company and each of the mutual funds managed by the Company acquired by Manulife in the recent merger. Amortizable assets include value of business acquired (VOBA), distribution networks and other investment management contracts. VOBA is the present value of estimated future profits of insurance policies in force related to businesses acquired by Manulife in the recent merger. VOBA had weighted average lives ranging from 6 to 17 years for various insurance businesses at the merger. Distribution networks are values assigned to the Company's networks of sales agents and producers responsible for procuring business acquired by Manulife in the recent merger. Distribution networks had weighted average lives of 22 years at the merger. Other investment management contracts are the values assigned to the Company's institutional investment management contracts managed by its investment management subsidiaries. Other investment management contracts have weighted average lives of 10 years at the merger. Collectively, these amortizable intangible assets have a weighted average life of 15 years at the merger. Brand name, distribution networks, and other investment management contracts were initially recognized at the time of the acquisition of the Company by Manulife. Goodwill, investment management contracts and VOBA were expanded in scope and size as a result of the merger. The Company will test unamortizable intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis, and also in response to any events which suggest that these assets may be impaired (triggering events.) Amortizable intangible assets will be tested only in response to triggering events. The Company will test goodwill using the two-step impairment testing program set forth in SFAS No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." The Company's other intangible assets will be evaluated by comparing their fair values to their current carrying values whenever they are tested. Impairments will be recorded whenever an intangible asset's fair value is deemed to be less than its carrying value. 19
10-Q20th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 20th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED) Note 7 -- Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - (continued) The following tables set forth certain summarized financial information relating to the Company's intangible assets as of the dates and periods indicated. [Enlarge/Download Table] Accumulated Gross Carrying Amortization Amount and Other Changes Net Carrying Amount ------------------------------------------------------------- (in millions) March 31, 2005 Unamortizable intangible assets Goodwill ............................... $3,031.7 -- $3,031.7 Brand name ............................. 600.0 -- 600.0 Investment management contracts ........ 292.9 -- 292.9 Amortizable intangible assets: Distribution networks .................. 397.2 $ (1.8) 395.4 Other investment management contracts .. 61.7 (3.9) 57.8 VOBA ................................... 2,864.6 (151.4) 2,713.2 December 31, 2004 Unamortizable intangible assets Goodwill ............................... $3,031.7 -- $3,031.7 Brand name ............................. 600.0 -- 600.0 Investment management contracts ........ 292.9 -- 292.9 Amortizable intangible assets: Distribution networks .................. 397.2 $ (0.7) 396.5 Other investment management contracts .. 61.7 (2.6) 59.1 VOBA ................................... 2,864.6 (164.3) 2,700.3 [Enlarge/Download Table] Three months ended March 31, 2005 2004 ---------------------------- Aggregate amortization expense (in millions) Distribution networks, net of tax of $ 0.4 million and $ - million, respectively................................................ $ 0.7 -- Other management contract amortization, net of tax of $ 0.5 million and $ - million, respectively............................................ 0.8 -- VOBA, net of tax of $ 12.9 million and $ 1.7 million, respectively............................................................. 23.9 $3.1 ---------------------------- Aggregate amortization expense, net of tax of $ 13.8 million and $ 1.7 million, respectively.................................................... $25.4 $3.1 ============================ 20
10-Q21st Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 21st
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED) Note 7 -- Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - (continued) [Enlarge/Download Table] Tax Net Effect Expense ------------------ (in millions) Estimated future aggregate amortization expense for the years ending December 31, 2005........................................................................... $60.2 $111.8 2006........................................................................... 61.8 114.9 2007........................................................................... 53.0 98.5 2008........................................................................... 45.8 85.0 2009........................................................................... 43.5 80.8 The following tables present the continuity of each of the Company's unamortizable and amortizable intangible assets for the periods presented. Unamortizable intangible assets: [Enlarge/Download Table] Corporate Wealth and Protection Management G&SFP Other Consolidated ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Goodwill: Balance at January 1, 2005.................... $ 1,842.3 $ 1,040.0 -- $ 149.4 $ 3,031.7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at March 1, 2005...................... $ 1,842.3 $ 1,040.0 -- $ 149.4 $ 3,031.7 ============================================================================ [Enlarge/Download Table] Corporate Wealth and Protection Management G&SFP Other Consolidated ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Goodwill: Balance at January 1, 2004 ................... $ 66.1 $ 42.1 -- $ 0.4 $ 108.6 Goodwill derecognized (1) .................... (66.1) (42.1) -- (0.4) (108.6) Goodwill recognized (2) ...................... 1,842.3 1,040.0 -- 149.4 3,031.7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 2004 ................. $1,842.3 $1,040.0 -- $ 149.4 $3,031.7 ============================================================================ (1) Goodwill derecognized in the purchase transaction with Manulife. (2) Goodwill recognized in the purchase transaction with Manulife. 21
10-Q22nd Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 22nd
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED) Note 7 -- Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - (continued) Unamortizable intangible assets - (continued): [Enlarge/Download Table] Corporate Wealth and Protection Management G&SFP Other Consolidated ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brand name: Balance at January 1, 2005 .................. $ 364.4 $ 209.0 -- $ 26.6 $ 600.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at March 31, 2005 .................... $ 364.4 $ 209.0 -- $ 26.6 $ 600.0 ============================================================================ [Enlarge/Download Table] Corporate Wealth and Protection Management G&SFP Other Consolidated ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brand name: Balance at January 1, 2004 ................... -- -- -- -- -- Brand name recognized (1) .................... $ 364.4 $ 209.0 -- $ 26.6 $ 600.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 2004 ................. $ 364.4 $ 209.0 -- $ 26.6 $ 600.0 ============================================================================ (1) Brand name recognized in the purchase transaction with Manulife. [Enlarge/Download Table] Corporate Wealth and Protection Management G&SFP Other Consolidated ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Investment management contracts: Balance at January 1, 2005 ................... -- $ 292.9 -- -- $ 292.9 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at March 31, 2005 .................... -- $ 292.9 -- -- $ 292.9 ============================================================================ [Enlarge/Download Table] Corporate Wealth and Protection Management G&SFP Other Consolidated ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Investment management contracts: Balance at January 1, 2004 ................... -- $ 6.3 -- -- $ 6.3 Investment management contracts derecognized (1) ........................... -- (6.3) -- -- (6.3) Investment management contracts recognized (2) ............................. -- 292.9 -- -- 292.9 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 2004 ................. -- $ 292.9 -- -- $ 292.9 ============================================================================ (1) Investment management contracts derecognized in the purchase transaction with Manulife. (2) Investment management contracts recognized in the purchase transaction with Manulife. 22
10-Q23rd Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 23rd
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED) Note 7 -- Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - (continued) Amortizable intangible assets: [Enlarge/Download Table] Corporate Wealth and Protection Management G&SFP Other Consolidated ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Distribution networks: Balance at January 1, 2005 ................... $ 307.9 $ 88.6 -- -- $ 396.5 Amortization ................................. (1.0) (0.1) -- -- (1.1) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at March 31, 2005 .................... $ 306.9 88.5 -- -- $ 395.4 ============================================================================ [Enlarge/Download Table] Corporate Wealth and Protection Management G&SFP Other Consolidated ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Distribution networks: Balance at January 1, 2004 ................... -- -- -- -- -- Distribution networks recognized (1) ......... $ 308.6 $ 88.6 -- -- $ 397.2 Amortization ................................. (0.7) -- -- -- (0.7) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 2004 ................. $ 307.9 $ 88.6 -- -- $ 396.5 ============================================================================ (1) Distribution networks recognized in the purchase transaction with Manulife. [Enlarge/Download Table] Corporate Wealth and Protection Management G&SFP Other Consolidated --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other investment management contracts: Balance at January 1, 2005 ................... -- $ 19.5 -- $ 39.6 $ 59.1 Amortization ................................. -- (0.4) -- (0.9) (1.3) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at March 31, 2005 .................... -- $ 19.1 -- $ 38.7 $ 57.8 =========================================================================== [Enlarge/Download Table] Corporate Wealth and Protection Management G&SFP Other Consolidated ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other investment management contracts: Balance at January 1, 2004 ................... -- -- -- -- -- Other investment management contracts recognized (1) ............................. -- $ 20.3 -- $ 41.4 $ 61.7 Amortization ................................. -- (0.8) -- (1.8) (2.6) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 2004 ................. -- $ 19.5 -- $ 39.6 $ 59.1 ============================================================================ (1) Other investment management contracts recognized in the purchase transaction with Manulife. 23
10-Q24th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 24th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED) Note 7 -- Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - (continued) [Enlarge/Download Table] Corporate Wealth and Protection Management G&SFP Other Consolidated ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOBA: VOBA balance at January 1, 2005 .............. $2,084.1 $ 406.4 $209.8 -- $2,700.3 Amortization ................................. (17.8) (11.2) (7.8) -- (36.8) Adjustment to unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale .............. 22.5 27.2 -- -- 49.7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOBA balance at March 31, 2005 ............... $2,088.8 $ 422.4 $202.0 -- $2,713.2 ============================================================================ [Enlarge/Download Table] Corporate Wealth and Protection Management G&SFP Other Consolidated ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOBA: VOBA balance at January 1, 2004 .............. $ 168.5 -- -- -- $ 168.5 Amortization ................................. (5.1) -- -- -- (5.1) Adjustment to unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale .............. 5.5 -- -- -- 5.5 Other adjustments (1) ........................ (1.4) -- -- -- (1.4) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOBA balance at April 28, 2004 ............... $ 167.5 -- -- -- $ 167.5 ============================================================================ (1) VOBA existing prior to the merger with Manulife related to the acquisition of the fixed universal life insurance business of Allmerica was adjusted to reflect adjustments to the purchase equation. [Enlarge/Download Table] Corporate Wealth and Protection Management G&SFP Other Consolidated --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOBA: Balance at April 29, 2004 .................... $ 167.5 -- -- -- $ 167.5 VOBA derecognized (1) ........................ (167.5) -- -- -- (167.5) VOBA recognized (2) .......................... 2,141.8 $ 474.9 $247.9 -- 2,864.6 Amortization ................................. (35.4) (47.1) (38.1) -- (120.6) Adjustment to unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale ............. (22.3) (21.4) -- -- (43.7) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 2004 ................. $2,084.1 $ 406.4 $209.8 -- $2,700.3 =========================================================================== (1) VOBA derecognized in the purchase transaction with Manulife. (2) VOBA recognized in the purchase transaction with Manulife. 24
10-Q25th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 25th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED) Note 8 -- Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans The following table demonstrates the components of the Company's net periodic benefit cost for the periods indicated: Net Periodic Benefit Cost [Enlarge/Download Table] Three Months Ended March 31, ----------------------------------------------- Other Postretirement Pension Benefits Benefits ----------------------------------------------- 2005 2004 2005 2004 ----------------------------------------------- (in millions) Service cost ........................... $ 6.2 $ 5.6 $ 0.4 $ 0.4 Interest cost .......................... 30.6 32.4 9.0 9.2 Expected return on plan assets ......... (43.8) (44.1) (5.4) (5.2) Amortization of transition asset ....... -- -- -- -- Amortization of prior service cost ..... -- 1.7 -- (1.9) Recognized actuarial gain .............. 0.2 6.2 -- 3.1 Other .................................. -- -- -- -- --------------------------------------------- Net periodic benefit cost ......... $ (6.8) $ 1.8 $ 4.0 $ 5.6 ============================================= Employer Contributions The Company provides pension benefits to substantially all employees and general agency personnel. These benefits are provided through both funded qualified and unfunded non-qualified defined benefit and qualified defined contribution pension plans. Through the non-qualified defined benefit plans, the Company provides supplemental pension benefits to employees with salaries and/or pension benefits in excess of the qualified plan limits under applicable law. Prior to 2002, pension benefits under the defined benefit plans were also based on years of service and final average compensation (generally during the three years prior to retirement). In 2001, the defined benefit pension plans were amended to a cash balance basis under which benefits are based on career average compensation. Under grandfathering rules, employees within 5 years of early retirement eligibility or employees over age 40 and with at least 10 years of service will receive pension benefits based on the greater of the benefit from the cash balance basis or the prior final average salary basis. This amendment became effective on January 1, 2002. Benefits related to the defined benefit pension plans paid to employees and retirees were $49.5 million and $64.8 million for the first three months of 2005 and 2004 respectively. The Company uses a December 31 measurement date. The Company's policy is to fund its US other post retirement benefits in amounts at or below the annual tax qualified limits. As of March 31, 2005, $13.4 million was contributed to its US other post retirement benefit plans. The Company expects to contribute approximately $53.4 million to its US other post retirement benefit plans in 2005. Defined contribution plans include the Investment Incentive Plan and the Savings and Investment Plan. The expense for defined contribution plans was $3.1 million and $3.4 million for the first three months of 2005 and 2004, respectively. In addition to the Company defined benefit pension plans, the Company has employee welfare plans for medical and life insurance covering most of its retired employees and general agency personnel. Substantially all employees may become eligible for these benefits if they reach certain age and service requirements while employed by the Company. The postretirement health care coverages are contributory based for post January 1, 1992 non-union retirees. A small portion of pre-January 1, 1992 non-union retirees also contribute. The applicable contributions are based on the number of years of service. Dental insurance is provided to eligible pre-January 1, 1992 retired employees. On December 8, 2003, President Bush signed into law a bill that expands Medicare, primarily by adding a prescription drug benefit for Medicare-eligible retirees starting in 2006. The Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and 25
10-Q26th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 26th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED) Note 8 -- Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans - (continued) Modernization Act of 2003 provides for special tax-free subsidies to employers that offer plans with qualifying drug coverages beginning in 2006. There are two broad groups of retirees receiving employer-subsidized prescription drug benefits from John Hancock. The first group, those who retired prior to January 1, 1992, receives a subsidy of between 90% and 100% of total cost. Since this subsidy level will clearly meet Medicare's criteria for qualifying drug coverage, the Company anticipates that the benefits it pays after 2005 for pre 1992 retirees will be lower as a result of the new Medicare provisions. In accordance with FASB Staff Position FAS 106-2, the Company reflected a reduction in liability for this group of $40.9 million as of the purchase accounting remeasurement (April 28, 2004). With respect to the second group, those who retired on or after January 1, 1992, the employer subsidy on prescription drug benefits is capped and currently provides as low as 25% of total cost. Since final regulations on determining whether a benefit meets the actual criteria for qualifying drug coverage have not been issued by Medicare as of March 31, 2005, the Company will address the impact of the Act with respect to post-1991 retirees once these clarifying regulations have been issued. 26
10-Q27th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 27th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION and ANALYSIS of FINANCIAL CONDITION and RESULTS of OPERATIONS Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is presented in a condensed disclosure format pursuant to General Instruction H of Form 10-Q. The management narrative for the Company that follows should be read in conjunction with the unaudited interim financial statements and related footnotes to the unaudited interim condensed financial statements included elsewhere herein, and with the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section included in the Company's 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. All of the Company's United States Securities and Exchange Commission filings are available on the internet at www.sec.gov under the name John Hancock Life.. Statements, analyses, and other information contained in this report relating to trends in the Company's operations and financial results, the markets for the Company's products, the future development of the Company's business, and the contingencies and uncertainties to which the Company may be subject, as well as other statements including words such as "anticipate," "believe," "plan," "estimate," "intend," "will," "should," "may," and other similar expressions, are "forward-looking statements" under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are made based upon management's current expectations and beliefs concerning future events and their potential effects on the Company. Future events and their effects on the Company may not be those anticipated by management. The Company's actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Forward-Looking Statements" included herein for a discussion of factors that could cause or contribute to such material differences. Merger with Manulife Financial Corporation On April 28, 2004, JHFS, the parent of the Company, completed its merger agreement with Manulife Financial Corporation (Manulife) and as of the close of business JHFS common stock stopped trading on the New York Stock Exchange. In accordance with the agreement, each share of JHFS common stock was converted into 1.1853 shares of Manulife stock. Commencing on April 28, 2004, the Company now operates as a subsidiary of Manulife and the John Hancock name is Manulife's primary U.S. brand. Critical Accounting Policies General Management has identified the accounting policies below as critical to the Company's business operations and understanding of its results of operations. For a detailed discussion of the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 2--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the notes to consolidated financial statements of the Company's 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Note that the application of these accounting policies in the preparation of this report requires management to use judgments involving assumptions and estimates concerning future results or other developments including the likelihood, timing or amount of one or more future transactions or events. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates. These judgments are reviewed frequently by senior management, and an understanding of them may enhance the reader's understanding of the Company's financial statements. Management has discussed the identification, selection and disclosure of critical accounting estimates and policies with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. 27
10-Q28th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 28th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Purchase Accounting (PGAAP) In accordance with SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations" the merger transaction was accounted for as a purchase of John Hancock by Manulife. In accordance with "push down accounting", John Hancock, the acquired company, adjusted the cost and reporting basis of its assets and liabilities to their fair values on the acquisition date (the purchase adjustments). The determination of the purchase adjustments relating to investments reflected management's reliance on independent price quotes where available. Other purchase adjustments required significant management estimates and assumptions. The purchase adjustments relating to intangible assets, including brand name and VOBA, and liabilities, including policyholder reserves, required management to exercise significant judgment to assess the value of these items. The Company is in the process of completing the valuation of a portion of the assets required and liabilities assumed, thus the allocation of the purchase price is subject to refinement. The Company's purchase adjustments resulted in a revalued balance sheet which may result in future earnings trends which differ significantly from historical trends. The Company does not anticipate any impact on its liquidity, or ability to pay claims of policyholders, arising out of the purchase accounting process related to the merger. Consolidation Accounting In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board re-issued Interpretation 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51," (FIN 46R) which clarifies the consolidation accounting guidance of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements," (ARB No. 51) to certain entities for which controlling interests are not measurable by reference to ownership in the equity of the entity. Such entities are known as variable interest entities (VIEs). The Company has finalized its FIN 46R analysis for all of the entities described below. The Company is not the primary beneficiary of any of them. For many of these, the application of FIN 46R required estimation by the Company of the future periodic cash flows and changes in fair values for each candidate, starting as of the Company's original commitment to invest in and/or manage each candidate, and extending out to the end of the full expected life of each. These cash flows and fair values were then analyzed for variability, and this expected variability was quantified and compared to total historical amounts invested in each candidate's equity to help determine if each candidate is a VIE. The Company also evaluated quantitative and non-quantitative aspects of control relationships among the owners and decision makers of each candidate to help determine if they are VIEs. For each candidate determined to be a VIE, the expected variable losses and returns were then theoretically allocated out to the various investors and other participants in each candidate, in order to determine if any party had exposure to the majority of the expected variable losses or returns, in which case that party is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The Company used significant levels of judgment while performing these quantitative and qualitative assessments. The paragraphs below describe the Company's relationships with, and the general nature of each major category of entity analyzed by the Company under FIN 46R. The Investment Management Segment of the Company manages invested assets for its customers under various fee-based arrangements using a variety of entities to hold these assets under management, and since 1996, this has included investment vehicles commonly known as collateralized debt obligations funds (CDOs). Various business units of the Company sometimes invest in the debt or equity securities issued by these and other CDOs to support their insurance liabilities. Since 1995, the Company generates income tax benefits by investing in apartment properties (the Properties) that qualify for low income housing and/or historic tax credits. The Company invests in the Properties directly, but primarily invests indirectly via limited partnership real estate investment funds (The Funds). The Funds are consolidated into the Company's financial statements. The Properties are organized as limited partnerships or limited liability companies each having a managing general partner or a managing member. The Company is usually the sole limited partner or investor member in each Property; it is not the general partner or managing member in any Property. The Properties typically raise additional capital by qualifying for long-term debt, which at times is guaranteed or otherwise subsidized by Federal or state agencies or Fannie Mae. In certain cases, the Company invests in the mortgages of the Properties. 28
10-Q29th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 29th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY The Company has a number of relationships with a disparate group of entities (Other Entities), which result from the Company's direct investment in their equity and/or debt. This group includes, among others, energy investment partnerships, investment funds organized as limited partnerships, and manufacturing companies in whose debt the Company invests, and which subsequently underwent corporate reorganizations. Additional liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating any of these entities would not represent additional claims on the general assets of the Company; rather, they would represent claims against additional assets recognized by the Company as a result of these consolidations. Conversely, additional assets recognized as a result of these consolidations would not represent additional assets which the Company could use to satisfy claims against its general assets, rather they would be used only to settle additional liabilities recognized as a result of these consolidations. The Company's maximum exposure to loss in relation to these entities is limited to its investments in them, future debt and equity commitments made to them, and where the Company is the mortgagor to the Properties, the outstanding balance of the mortgages originated for them, and outstanding mortgage commitments made to them. Therefore, the Company believes that the application of FIN 46R will have no impact on the Company's liquidity and capital resources beyond what is already presented in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. The Company discloses summary financial data and its maximum exposure to losses for these entities in Note 4 - Relationships with Variable Interest Entities in the notes to its consolidated financial statements included in the Company's 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Amortization of Deferred Acquisition Costs and Value of Business Added (VOBA) Assets Costs that vary with, and are related primarily to, the production of new business are deferred to the extent that they are deemed recoverable. Such costs include commissions, certain costs of policy issue and underwriting, and certain agency expenses. Similarly, any amounts assessed as front-end loads are recorded as unearned revenue. The Company has also recorded intangible assets representing the present value of estimated future profits of insurance policies in force related to business acquired. The Company tests the recoverability of its DAC and VOBA assets quarterly with a model that uses data such as market performance, lapse rates and expense levels. DAC and VOBA are amortized on term life and long-term care insurance ratably with premiums. DAC and VOBA on annuity products and retail life, other than term life, insurance policies, are amortized based on a percentage of the estimated gross profits over the life of the policies, which are generally twenty years for annuities and thirty years for life policies. Estimated gross profits are computed based on assumptions related to the underlying policies including mortality, lapse, expenses, and asset growth rates. DAC and VOBA and unearned revenue are amortized on these policies such that the percentage of gross profits realized to the amount of DAC and VOBA and unearned revenue amortized is constant over the life of the policies. Estimated gross profits, including net realized investment and other gains (losses), are adjusted periodically to take into consideration the actual experience to date and assumed changes in the remaining gross profits. When estimated gross profits are adjusted, the amortization of DAC and VOBA is also adjusted to maintain a constant amortization percentage over the life of the policies. The current estimated gross profits include certain judgments by the Company's actuaries concerning mortality, lapse and asset growth that are based on a combination of actual Company experience and historical market experience of equity and fixed income returns. Short-term variances of actual results from the judgments made by management can impact quarter-to-quarter earnings. History has shown that the actual results over time for mortality, lapse and the combination of investment returns and crediting rates (referred in the industry as interest spread) for the life insurance and annuity products have reasonably followed the long-term historical trends. As actual results for market experience, or asset growth, fluctuate significantly from historical trends and the long-term assumptions made in calculating expected gross profits, management changes these assumptions periodically, as necessary. Benefits to Policyholders The liability for future policy benefits is the largest liability included in the Company's consolidated balance sheets, equal to $43,053.6 million, or 49.1%, of total liabilities as of March 31, 2005. Changes in this liability are generally reflected in the benefits to policyholders in the consolidated statements of income. This liability is primarily comprised of the present value of estimated future payments to holders of life insurance, long-term care insurance and annuity products based on certain management judgments. Reserves for future policy benefits of certain insurance products are calculated using management's judgments of mortality, morbidity, lapse, investment performance and expense levels that are based primarily on the Company's past experience and are therefore reflective of the Company's proven underwriting and investing abilities. Once these assumptions are made for a given policy or group of policies, they will not be changed over the life of the policy unless the Company recognizes a loss on the entire line of business. The Company periodically reviews its policies for loss 29
10-Q30th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 30th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY recognition and, based on management's judgment, the Company from time to time may recognize a loss on certain lines of business. Short-term variances of actual results from the judgments made by management are reflected in current period earnings and can impact quarter to quarter earnings. Investment in Debt and Equity Securities Impairments on the Company's investment portfolio are recorded as a charge to income in the period when the impairment is judged by management to occur. See the General Account Investments section of this document for a more detailed discussion of the investment officers' professional judgments involved in determining impairments and fair values. Certain of the Company's fixed income securities classified as available-for-sale are not publicly traded, and quoted market prices are not available from brokers or investment bankers on these securities. Changes in the fair values of the available-for-sale securities are recorded in other comprehensive income as unrealized gains and /or losses. The fair values of these securities are calculated through the use of pricing models and discounted cash flows calling for a substantial level of professional investment management judgment. The Company's approach is based on currently available information, including information obtained by reviewing similarly traded securities in the market, and management believes it to be appropriate and fundamentally sound. However, different pricing models or assumptions or changes in relevant current information could produce different valuation results. The Company's pricing model takes into account a number of factors based on current market conditions and trading levels of similar securities. These include current market based factors related to credit quality, country of issue, market sector and average investment life. The resulting prices are then reviewed by the pricing analysts and members of the Security Operations Department. The pricing analysts take appropriate action to reduce the valuation of securities where an event occurs that negatively impacts the securities' value. Certain events that could impact the valuation of securities include issuer credit ratings, business climate, management changes at the investee level, litigation, fraud, and government actions, among others. As part of the valuation process attempts are made to identify securities which may have experienced an other than temporary decline in value, and thus require the recognition of an other than temporary impairment. To assist in identifying these impairments, at the end of each quarter the Company's Investment Review Committee reviews all securities where market value has been less than ninety percent of amortized cost for three months or more to determine whether other than temporary impairments need to be taken. This committee includes the head of workouts, the head of each industry team, the head of portfolio management, and the Chief Credit Officer of Manulife. The analysis focuses on each investee company's or project's ability to service its debts in a timely fashion and the length of time the security has been trading below amortized cost. The results of this analysis are reviewed quarterly by the Credit Committee at Manulife. This committee includes Manulife's Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer, Chief Risk Officer and Chief Credit Officer. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--General Account Investments" section of this document for a more detailed discussion of this process and the judgments used therein. Benefit Plans The Company annually reviews its pension and other post-employment benefit plan assumptions for the discount rate, the long-term rate of return on plan assets, and the compensation increase rate for incorporation in the measurements made annually as of each December 31 and for net periodic costs for the subsequent calendar year resulting therefrom. The Company also performed this review as of April 28, 2004, the date of JHFSs' merger with Manulife. All assumptions are reviewed and approved by the Chief Financial Officer and reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Please refer to "Benefit Plans" in the Critical Accounting Policies section of the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section included in the Company's 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of the accounting policies the company uses for its employee benefit plans. Income Taxes The Company's reported effective tax rate on net income was 35.4% and 24.0% for the three month periods ending March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate between periods was due to changes in the recognition of tax expense as a result of the purchase accounting for leveraged leases as required by FASB Interpretation No. 21, "Accounting for Leases in a Business Combination" and FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, "Accounting for Leases". The effective tax rate is based on expected income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available and requires significant judgment in determining and in evaluating the Company's tax positions. Despite the belief that the Company's tax return positions are fully supportable, management believes that certain positions are likely to be challenged and certain reserves are established in the event the Company may not succeed. The reserves are adjusted in light of changing facts and circumstances, 30
10-Q31st Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 31st
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY such as the progress of a tax audit. The effective tax rate includes the impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that management considers appropriate. Tax regulations require certain items to be included in the tax return at different times than the items are reflected in the financial statements. As a result, the effective tax rate reflected in the financial statements is different than that reported in the Company's tax return. Some of these differences are permanent, such as affordable housing tax credits, and some are temporary differences, such as depreciation expense. Temporary differences create deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets generally represent items that can be used as tax deductions or credits in future tax returns for which the related tax benefit has already been recognized in the Company's income statement. The Company's policy is to establish valuation allowances for deferred tax assets when the amount of expected future taxable income is not likely to support the use of the deduction or credit. Deferred tax liabilities generally represent tax expenses recognized in the financial statements for which payment has been deferred or for which deductions have been taken on the tax return but have not yet recognized in the financial statements. The Internal Revenue Service is currently examining the Company's tax returns for 1999 through 2001. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular tax matter, management believes that the current reserves reflect the probable outcome of known tax contingencies. Tax reserves are presented in the balance sheet within other liabilities. Reinsurance As part of the Manulife group of companies' subsequent to the merger, the Company reinsures portions of the risks it assumes for its Protection Segment insurance products. The maximum amount of individual ordinary life insurance retained on any life is $20 million under an individual policy and $25 million under a second-to-die policy. As of January 1, 2001, the Company established additional reinsurance programs, which limit its exposure to fluctuations in life insurance claims for individuals for whom the net amount at risk is $3 million or more. As of January 1, 2001, the Company also entered into agreements with two reinsurers covering 50% of its closed block business. One of these reinsurers is Manulife. Effective April 28, 2004 the Company operates as a subsidiary of Manulife. During the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company entered into an additional agreement covering closed block policies with a Manulife affiliate in order to facilitate its statutory capital management process. This transaction increased the amount of reinsurance of the closed block with Manulife by 20%. Effective December 31, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with a third reinsurer covering another 5% of its closed block business. The reinsurance agreements are structured so they will not affect policyholder dividends or any other financial items reported within the closed block, which was established at the time of the Company's demutualization to protect the reasonable dividend expectations of certain participating life insurance policyholders. In addition, the Company has entered into reinsurance agreements to specifically address exposure to multiple life insurance claims as a result of a catastrophic event. The Company has put into place, effective July 1, 2002, catastrophic reinsurance covering individual life insurance policies written by all of its U.S. life insurance subsidiaries. Effective July 1, 2004, the Company is covered by its parent's catastrophic reinsurance under its global catastrophe reinsurance program which covers the entire Manulife group of companies for losses in excess of $50 million up to $150 million. This global catastrophe reinsurance covers all terrorist acts in Canada; in the United States and elsewhere, nuclear, biological and chemical terrorist acts are not covered. By entering into reinsurance agreements with a diverse group of highly rated reinsurers, the Company seeks to control its exposure to losses. Reinsurance, however, does not discharge the Company's legal obligations to pay policy claims on the policies reinsured. As a result, it enters into reinsurance agreements only with highly rated reinsurers. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that all reinsurers will pay the claims made against them. Failure of reinsurers to pay claims or limitations or lack of catastrophic reinsurance in the future, could adversely affect the Company's future net income and financial position. The long-term care insurance business units reinsure with John Hancock Reassurance Company, LTD (JHReCo), a wholly owned subsidiary of JHFS. In 2001, Group Long Term Care ceded 50% of their in force business prior to 1997 to JHReCo (up from 40% in 2000 and 30% in 1999) and 50% of all new business effective in 1997 and later. Retail Long-Term Care cedes to JHReCo 50% of all new business effective 1997 and later and 50% of business assumed from the acquisition of the Fortis long-term care insurance business in March of 2000. Fortis was retro-ceded to JHReCo. The non-traditional life insurance business reinsures with JHReCo 100% of the risk associated with the no lapse guarantee benefit present in the protection universal life insurance products. This reinsurance agreement was effective in 2001 and includes policies issued in years 2001 and later. In addition, the traditional life insurance business entered into a reinsurance agreement with JHReCo to reinsure 50% of its retained 31
10-Q32nd Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 32nd
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY level premium term business written by the Company's subsidiary, John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company. The agreement was effective in 2002 and includes in force policies. Results of Operations JHFS, the Company's parent was merged with Manulife Financial Corporation effective April 28, 2004. The following discussion provides an assessment of the consolidated results of operations and liquidity and capital resources for the Company and the Predecessor Company. As further discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements the merger was accounted for as a purchase. Accordingly, the operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2005 reflect the results of operations of the Company subsequent to the merger and include the impact of adjustments required under the purchase method of accounting. The table below presents the consolidated results of operations for the periods presented. [Enlarge/Download Table] Predecessor Company Company ---------- ---------- Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 2004 ----------------------- (in millions) Revenues Premiums ............................................................................. $ 490.4 $ 470.7 Universal life and investment-type product fees ...................................... 165.4 176.8 Net investment income ................................................................ 864.3 983.5 Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net of related amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, amounts credited to participating pension contractholders and the policyholder dividend obligation (1) ...................... 157.3 (97.7) Investment management revenues, commissions and other fees ........................... 136.3 132.4 Other revenue ........................................................................ 63.5 71.2 -------- -------- Total revenues ................................................................. 1,877.2 1,736.9 Benefits and Expenses Benefits to policyholders, excluding amounts related to net realized investment and other gains (losses) credited to participating pension contractholders and the policyholder dividend obligation (2) ...................... 903.7 935.3 Other operating costs and expenses ................................................... 381.9 370.7 Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired, excluding amounts related to net realized investment and other gains (losses)(3) ........................................................... 47.8 106.8 Dividends to policyholders ........................................................... 118.1 116.6 -------- -------- Total benefits and expenses .................................................... 1,451.5 1,529.4 Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change ................... 425.7 207.5 Income taxes ............................................................................ 150.6 49.9 -------- -------- Income before cumulative effect of accounting change .................................... 275.1 157.6 Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax ..................................... -- (3.3) -------- -------- Net income .............................................................................. $ 275.1 $ 154.3 ======== ======== (1) Net of related amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, amounts credited to participating pension contractholders and the policyholder dividend obligation of $(64.8) million and $(72.5) million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. (2) Excluding amounts related to net realized investment and other gains (losses) credited to participating pension contractholders and the policyholder dividend obligation of $(60.8) million and $(90.5) million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. (3) Excluding amounts related to net realized investment and other gains (losses) of $(4.0) million and $18.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. 32
10-Q33rd Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 33rd
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 Compared with Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 The Company operates in the following four business segments: two segments primarily serve retail customers, one segment serves institutional customers, and the fourth segment is the Corporate and Other Segment, which includes the institutional advisory business, the remaining international operations, and the corporate account. The retail segments are the Protection Segment and the Wealth Management Segment, previously called Asset Gathering. The institutional segment is the Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products Segment (G&SFP). Consolidated income before income taxes increased $218.2 million, for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 from the prior year. The increase was driven by $157.3 million in net realized investment and other gains in 2005 compared with $97.7 million in losses for the prior year period. This was primarily due to increased gains on hedging instruments and fewer impairments of securities. Other factors contributing to increase in income before taxes included improved market appreciation, favorably impacting the Company's variable product lines, and lower amortization of DAC and VOBA driven by purchase accounting (see further discussion in the amortization of DAC and VOBA paragraph below) on all segments. For additional analysis regarding net realized investment and other gains (losses), see below and General Account Investments in the MD&A. Total revenues increased $140.3 million during the quarter compared with the corresponding period in 2004. Premiums increased $19.7 million from the prior year due largely to higher sales in the IGP segment, and higher in force LTC business, partially offset by normal run off of business in the Closed Block. Universal life and investment-type product fees decreased $11.4 million from the prior year primarily due to not repeating higher amortization of unearned revenue in 2004 driven by unlocking for higher future death claims and lower sales in 2005. Net investment income decreased $119.2 million from the prior year reflecting a decrease in yield on the general account portfolio driven by the April 28, 2004 asset mark to market done in accordance with purchase accounting guidelines and a decrease in average assets. (For additional analysis of net investment income and yields see the General Account Investments section of this MD&A.) Net realized investment and other gains (losses) increased $255.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 primarily due to an increase in gains related to hedging adjustments and lower impairments. (For additional analysis of Net realized investment and other gains (losses) see the General Account Investments section of this MD&A.) Total benefits and expenses decreased $77.9 million from the prior year. Benefits to policyholders decreased $31.6 million due to a decline in the average interest credited rate on account balances and a decrease in the policyholder dividend obligation. Approximately $9 billion of spread-based liabilities have floating rates which reset and reflect the lower interest rate environment. Operating costs and expenses increased $11.2 million. Amortization of value of business added (VOBA) and deferred policy acquisition costs (DAC) decreased $59.0 million from the prior year primarily as a result of purchase accounting on all segments. Purchase accounting adjusted the historical DAC asset to zero and created a new VOBA asset. Dividends to policyholders increased $1.5 million from the prior year. Income taxes increased $100.7 million in the first quarter of 2005 compared with the first quarter of 2004 due to higher income before taxes discussed previously and a higher effective tax rate. The effective tax rate increased to 35.4% compared with 24.0% in the prior quarter primarily due to changes in the recognition of tax expense as a result of the purchase accounting for leveraged leases as required by FASB Interpretation No. 21, "Accounting for Leases in a Business Combination" and FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, "Accounting for Leases". Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax, was a charge of $3.3 million in the first quarter of 2004 reflecting the adoption of SOP 03-1 which requires specialized accounting for insurance companies related to separate accounts, transfers of assets, liability valuations, returns based on a contractually referenced pool of assets or index, accounting for contracts that contain death or other insurance benefit features, accounting for reinsurance and other similar contracts, accounting for annuitization benefits and sales inducements to contractholders. 33
10-Q34th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 34th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY General Account Investments The Company manages its general account assets in investment segments that support specific classes of product liabilities. These investment segments facilitate the implementation of investment policies that both support the financial characteristics of the underlying liabilities and provide returns on invested capital. The investment segments also enable the monitoring of the performance and profitability of the various businesses. Asset/Liability Risk Management The Company's primary investment objective is to maximize after-tax returns within acceptable risk parameters. It is exposed to two primary types of investment risk: o Interest rate risk, meaning changes in the market value of securities as interest rates change over time, and o Credit risk, meaning uncertainties associated with the continued ability of an obligor to make timely payments of principal and interest. A variety of techniques are used to control interest rate risk in the portfolio of assets and liabilities. In general, risk management procedures are designed to limit the net impact of interest rate changes on both assets and liabilities. Assets are invested predominantly in fixed income securities, and the asset portfolio is substantially matched with the liabilities so as to eliminate the Company's exposure to changes in the overall level of interest rates. Each investment segment holds bonds, mortgages, and other asset types that will satisfy the projected cash needs of its underlying liabilities. Another important aspect of the asset-liability management efforts is the use of interest rate derivatives. Select derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps and futures, are utilized to reduce the interest rate risk inherent in combined portfolios of assets and liabilities. Management of credit risk is also central to the business and considerable resources are devoted to the credit analysis underlying each investment acquisition. The corporate bond management group includes a staff of highly specialized, experienced, and well-trained credit analysts. Management relies on these analysts' ability to analyze complex private financing transactions and to acquire the investments needed to profitably fund liability requirements. In addition, when investing in private fixed maturity securities, broad access to proprietary management information, negotiated protective covenants, call protection features and collateral protection are used to minimize credit risk. The bond portfolio is reviewed on a continuous basis to assess the integrity of current quality ratings. As circumstances warrant, specific investments are "re-rated" with the adjusted quality ratings reflected in the Company's investment system. All bonds are evaluated regularly against the following criteria: o material declines in the issuer's revenues or margins; o significant management or organizational changes; o significant uncertainty regarding the issuer's industry; o debt service coverage or cash flow ratios that fall below industry-specific thresholds; o violation of financial covenants; and o other business factors that relate to the issuer. Insurance product prices are impacted by investment results as well as other results (e.g. mortality, lapse). Accordingly, incorporated in insurance products prices are assumptions of expected default losses over the long-term. Actual losses therefore vary above and below this average, and the market value of the portfolio as a whole also changes as market credit spreads move up and down during an economic cycle. The Company is able to hold to this investment strategy over the long term because of its strong capital position, the fixed nature of its liabilities, the matching of those liabilities with assets, and the experience gained through many decades of a consistent investment philosophy. Generally all of the fixed maturity investments are held to maturity to meet liability payments, and to hold securities with any unrealized gains and losses over the long term. However, bonds are sold under certain circumstances, such as when new information causes changes in assessments of whether a bond will recover or perform according to its contractual terms, in response to external events (such 34
10-Q35th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 35th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY as a merger or a downgrade) that result in investment guideline violations (such as single issuer or overall portfolio credit quality limits), in response to extreme catastrophic events (such as September 11, 2001) that result in industry or market wide disruption, or to take advantage of tender offers. Overall Composition of the General Account Invested assets, excluding separate accounts totaled $64.9 billion and $66.7 billion as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. On April 28, 2004, as a result of Manulife's acquisition of John Hancock, assets were marked to market, which became the new cost basis of those assets, in accordance with purchase accounting guidelines. The following table shows the composition of investments in the general account portfolio. [Enlarge/Download Table] As of March 31, As of December 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2005 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Carrying % of Carrying % of Value Total Value Total ------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in millions) Fixed maturity securities (1)............ $46,532.0 71.7% $47,863.2 71.8% Mortgage loans (2)....................... 11,600.6 17.9 11,792.6 17.7 Real estate.............................. 272.9 0.4 277.2 0.4 Policy loans (3)......................... 2,018.4 3.1 2,012.0 3.0 Equity securities........................ 456.1 0.7 334.7 0.5 Other invested assets ................... 3,371.6 5.2 3,359.3 5.0 Short-term investments................... 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 Cash and cash equivalents (4)............ 666.8 1.0 1,073.3 1.6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total invested assets............. $64,918.6 100.0% $66,712.5 100.0% ========================================================================= (1) In addition to bonds, the fixed maturity security portfolio contains redeemable preferred stock with a carrying value of $896.8 million and $902.4 million as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The total fair value of the fixed maturity security portfolio was $46,532.0 million and $47,863.2 million, at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. (2) The fair value for the mortgage loan portfolio was $11,469.4 million and $11,873.1 million as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. (3) Policy loans are secured by the cash value of the underlying life insurance policies and do not mature in a conventional sense, but expire in conjunction with the related policy liabilities. (4) Cash and cash equivalents are included in total invested assets in the table above for the purposes of calculating yields on the income producing assets for the Company. The Company determines the allocation of assets primarily on the basis of cash flow and return requirements of its products and by the level of investment risk. Consistent with the nature of the Company's product liabilities, assets are heavily oriented toward fixed maturity securities. The Company determines the allocation of assets primarily on the basis of cash flow and return requirements of its products and by the level of investment risk. Fixed Maturity Securities. The fixed maturity securities portfolio is predominantly comprised of low risk, investment grade, publicly and privately traded corporate bonds and senior tranches of asset-backed securities (ABS) and mortgage-backed securities (MBS). The fixed maturity securities portfolio also includes redeemable preferred stock. As of March 31, 2005, fixed maturity securities represented 71.7% of general account invested assets with a carrying value of $46.5 billion, comprised of 52.7% public securities and 47.3% private securities. Each year, the Company directs the majority of net cash inflows into investment grade fixed maturity securities. Typically, less than 10% of funds allocated to fixed maturity securities are invested in below-investment-grade bonds while maintaining a policy to limit the overall level of these bonds to no more than 8% of invested assets and the majority of that balance in the BB category. As of March 31, 2005, the below investment grade bonds were 6.7% of invested assets, and 9.7% of total rated fixed maturities. Rated fixed maturity securities exclude redeemable preferred stock. Allocations are based on an assessment of relative value and the likelihood of enhancing risk-adjusted portfolio returns. While the Company has profited from the below-investment-grade asset class in the past, care is taken to manage its growth strategically by limiting its size relative to the Company's total assets. 35
10-Q36th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 36th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY The Securities Valuation Office (SVO) of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners evaluates all public and private bonds purchased as investments by insurance companies. The SVO assigns one of six investment categories to each securty it reviews. Category 1 is the highest quality rating, and Category 6 is the lowest. Categories 1 and 2 are the equivalent of investment grade debt as defined by rating agencies such as S&P and Moody's (i.e., BBB /Baa3 or higher), while Categories 3-6 are the equivalent of below-investment grade securities. SVO ratings are reviewed and may be revised at least once a year. The following table shows the composition by credit quality of the fixed maturity securities portfolio. Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Credit Quality [Enlarge/Download Table] As of March 31, As of December 31, 2005 2004 ---------------------------------------------------------------- SVO S&P Equivalent Carrying % of Carrying % of Rating (1) Designation (2) Value (3)(4) Total Value (3)(4) Total ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in millions) (in millions) 1 AAA/AA/A....................... $21,155.2 46.3% $20,826.0 44.4% 2 BBB............................ 20,109.5 44.0 21,409.2 45.6 3 BB............................. 2,532.9 5.6 2,548.5 5.4 4 B.............................. 1,212.1 2.7 1,423.8 3.0 5 CCC and lower.................. 419.1 0.9 526.2 1.1 6 In or near default............. 206.4 0.5 227.1 0.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Subtotal................... 45,635.2 100.0% 46,960.8 100.0% Redeemable preferred stock..... 896.8 902.4 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Total fixed maturities..... $46,532.0 $47,863.2 ================================================================ (1) For securities that are awaiting an SVO rating, the Company has assigned a rating based on an analysis that it believes is equivalent to that used by the SVO. (2) Comparisons between SVO and S&P ratings are published by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. (3) Includes 47 securities that are awaiting an SVO rating, with a carrying value of $536.8 million as of March 31, 2005 and 61 securities that are awaiting an SVO rating, with a carrying value of $876.6 million at December 31, 2004. Due to lags between the funding of an investment, the processing of final legal documents, the filing with the SVO, and the rating by the SVO, there will always be a number of unrated securities at each statement date. (4) As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, includes the effect of $185.0 million notional invested in the Company's credit-linked note program, $165.0 million notional of written credit default swaps on fixed maturity securities in the AAA/AA/A category and $20.0 million notional of written credit default swaps on fixed maturity securities in the BBB category. The table above sets forth the SVO ratings for the bond portfolio along with an equivalent S&P rating agency designation. The majority of the rated fixed maturity investments are investment grade, with 90.3% and 90.0% of rated fixed maturity investments invested in Category 1 and 2 as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. Below investment grade bonds were 9.7% and 10.0% of fixed maturity investments rated by the SVO and 6.7% and 7.1% of total invested assets at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. This allocation reflects the Company strategy of avoiding the unpredictability of interest rate risk in favor of relying on the Company's bond analysts' ability to better predict credit or default risk. The bond analysts operate in an industry-based, team-oriented structure that permits the evaluation of a wide range of below investment grade offerings in a variety of industries resulting in a well-diversified high yield portfolio. Valuation techniques for the bond portfolio vary by security type and the availability of market data. Pricing models and their underlying assumptions impact the amount and timing of unrealized gains and losses, and the use of different pricing models or assumptions could produce different financial results. External pricing services are used where available, broker dealer quotes are used for thinly traded securities, and a spread pricing matrix is used when price quotes are not available, which typically is the case for the Company's private placement securities. The spread pricing matrix is based on credit quality, country of issue, market sector and average investment life and is created for these dimensions through brokers' estimates of public spreads derived from their respective publications. When utilizing the spread pricing matrix, securities are valued through a discounted cash flow method where each bond is assigned a spread, which is added to the current U.S. Treasury rates to 36
10-Q37th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 37th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY discount the cash flows of the security. The spread assigned to each security is changed from month to month based on changes in the market. Certain market events that could impact the valuation of securities include issuer credit ratings, business climate, management changes, litigation, and government actions among others. The resulting prices are then reviewed by the pricing analysts and members of the Security Operations Department. The Company's pricing analysts take appropriate actions to reduce valuations of securities where such an event occurs that negatively impacts the securities' value. Although the Company believes its estimates reasonably reflect the fair value of those securities, the key assumptions about risk premiums, performance of underlying collateral (if any) and other factors involve significant assumptions and may not reflect those of an active market. To the extent that bonds have longer maturity dates, management's estimate of fair value may involve greater subjectivity since they involve judgment about events well into the future. Every quarter, there is a comprehensive review of all impaired securities and problem loans by Manulife's Credit Committee, a group consisting of Manulife's Chief Investment Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Risk Officer and Chief Credit Officer. The valuation of impaired bonds for which there is no quoted price is typically based on the present value of the future cash flows expected to be received. If the company is likely to continue operations, the estimate of future cash flows is typically based on the expected operating cash flows of the company that are available to make payments on the bonds. If the company is likely to liquidate, the estimate of future cash flows is based on an estimate of the liquidation value of its net assets. As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, 58.0% and 53.9% of the Company's below investment grade bonds were in Category 3, the highest quality below investment grade. Category 6 bonds, those in or near default, represent securities that were originally acquired as long-term investments, but subsequently became distressed. The carrying value of bonds in or near default was $206.4 million and $227.1 million as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, $0.9 million and $0.5 million, of interest on bonds near default were included in accrued investment income, respectively. Unless the Company reasonably expects to collect investment income on bonds in or near default, the accrual will be ceased and any accrued income reversed. In keeping with the investment philosophy of tightly managing interest rate risk, the Company's MBS & ABS holdings are heavily concentrated in commercial MBS where the underlying loans are largely call protected, which means they are not pre-payable without penalty prior to maturity at the option of the issuer. By investing in MBS and ABS securities with relatively predictable repayments, the Company adds high quality, liquid assets to the Company's portfolios without incurring the risk of cash flow variability. The Company believes the portion of its MBS/ABS portfolio subject to prepayment risk as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 was limited to approximately 25.3% and 24.0% of its total MBS/ABS portfolio and 5.2% and 4.8% of its total fixed maturity securities holdings, respectively. As a result of Manulife's acquisition of the Company, the Company's portfolio was marked to market through purchase accounting on April 28, 2004. The following tables show the composition by the Company's internal industry classification of the fixed maturity securities portfolio and the unrealized gains and losses contained therein. 37
10-Q38th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 38th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Industry Classification/Sector [Enlarge/Download Table] Investment Grade As of March 31, 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carrying Value Carrying Value of Securities of Securities Net with Gross Gross with Gross Gross Total Carrying Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Value Gain (Loss) Losses Gains Losses Losses ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (in millions) Corporate securities: Banking and finance ................... $ 5,832.3 $ 22.0 $ 2,689.1 $ 67.2 $ 3,143.2 $ (45.2) Communications ........................ 2,557.9 0.9 1,142.3 17.1 1,415.6 (16.2) Government ............................ 2,729.3 21.1 1,348.8 34.5 1,380.5 (13.4) Manufacturing ......................... 5,828.8 24.0 3,539.3 59.8 2,289.5 (35.8) Oil & gas ............................. 3,602.0 38.9 2,285.8 65.6 1,316.2 (26.7) Services/trade ........................ 2,422.9 (11.0) 1,039.1 9.6 1,383.8 (20.6) Transportation ........................ 1,996.9 (0.6) 995.1 13.7 1,001.8 (14.3) Utilities ............................. 7,070.0 62.8 4,566.6 97.7 2,503.4 (34.9) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total corporate securities .............. 32,040.1 158.1 17,606.1 365.2 14,434.0 (207.1) Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities ............................ 9,199.0 (14.0) 3,827.0 64.9 5,372.0 (78.9) U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies ........... 308.6 (2.4) 97.8 1.0 210.8 (3.4) Debt securities issued by foreign Governments ........................... 180.9 10.5 161.8 10.7 19.1 (0.2) Obligations of states and political subdivisions .......................... 294.8 (3.9) 27.7 0.2 267.1 (4.1) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total ............................... $42,023.4 $ 148.3 $21,720.4 $ 442.0 $20,303.0 $ (293.7) =================================================================================== [Enlarge/Download Table] Below Investment Grade As of March 31, 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carrying Value Carrying Value of Securities of Securities Net with Gross Gross with Gross Gross Total Carrying Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Value Gain (Loss) Losses Gains Losses Losses ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (in millions) Corporate securities: Banking and finance ................ $ 73.5 $ (1.4) $ 18.1 $ 0.1 $ 55.4 $ (1.5) Communications ..................... 157.6 0.1 103.9 4.9 53.7 (4.8) Government ......................... 16.1 0.1 16.1 0.1 -- -- Manufacturing ...................... 1,084.4 18.1 599.0 37.9 485.4 (19.8) Oil & gas .......................... 445.0 13.1 347.4 14.2 97.6 (1.1) Services/trade ..................... 168.0 7.4 122.7 8.0 45.3 (0.6) Transportation ..................... 412.5 (0.4) 183.2 8.4 229.3 (8.8) Utilities .......................... 1,815.2 20.5 1,096.8 49.1 718.4 (28.6) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total corporate securities ........... 4,172.3 57.5 2,487.2 122.7 1,685.1 (65.2) Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities ......................... 324.1 4.0 217.2 8.4 106.9 (4.4) Debt securities issued by foreign Governments ........................ 12.2 0.6 11.3 0.6 0.9 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total ............................ $4,508.6 $ 62.1 $2,715.7 $ 131.7 $1,792.9 $ (69.6) =================================================================================== 38
10-Q39th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 39th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Industry Classification/Sector [Enlarge/Download Table] Investment Grade as of December 31, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carrying Value Carrying Value of Securities of Securities Net with Gross Gross with Gross Gross Total Carrying Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Value Gain (Loss) Losses Gains Losses Losses ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (in millions) Corporate securities: Banking and finance ................... $ 6,051.8 $ 84.0 $ 4,465.3 $ 96.7 $ 1,586.5 $ (12.7) Communications ........................ 2,673.8 38.2 2,215.0 43.4 458.8 (5.2) Government ............................ 2,783.5 45.8 2,097.3 47.7 686.2 (1.9) Manufacturing ......................... 5,797.9 104.1 4,695.2 116.8 1,102.7 (12.7) Oil & gas ............................. 3,748.3 90.0 3,306.8 93.5 441.5 (3.5) Services / trade ...................... 2,569.9 25.0 1,971.3 30.1 598.6 (5.1) Transportation ........................ 2,039.1 27.0 1,734.0 29.5 305.1 (2.5) Utilities ............................. 7,296.3 149.3 6,234.4 154.6 1,061.9 (5.3) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total corporate securities .............. 32,960.6 563.4 26,719.3 612.3 6,241.3 (48.9) Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities ............................ 9,242.1 72.9 6,251.4 119.0 2,990.7 (46.1) U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies ........... 342.2 1.2 231.5 1.6 110.7 (0.4) Debt securities issued by foreign Governments ........................... 168.4 10.4 158.2 10.5 10.2 (0.1) Obligations of states and political Subdivisions .......................... 287.4 (0.9) 46.0 0.8 241.4 (1.7) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total ............................... $43,000.7 $ 647.0 $33,406.4 $ 744.2 $ 9,594.3 (97.2) =================================================================================== [Enlarge/Download Table] Below Investment Grade as of December 31, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carrying Value Carrying Value of Securities of Securities Net with Gross Gross with Gross Gross Total Carrying Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Value Gain (Loss) Losses Gains Losses Losses ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (in millions) Corporate securities: Banking and finance ................... $ 77.0 $ (0.6) $ 18.4 $ 0.5 $ 58.6 $ (1.1) Communications ........................ 148.9 8.7 101.6 9.1 47.3 (0.4) Government ............................ 16.1 0.1 6.6 0.1 9.5 -- Manufacturing ......................... 1,189.0 53.6 733.8 57.4 455.2 (3.8) Oil & gas ............................. 476.5 22.1 434.5 22.7 42.0 (0.6) Services/trade ........................ 222.0 5.9 182.4 6.2 39.6 (0.3) Transportation ........................ 474.6 14.4 370.6 17.8 104.0 (3.4) Utilities ............................. 1,900.9 65.9 1,516.3 71.3 384.6 (5.4) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total corporate securities .............. 4,505.0 170.1 3,364.2 185.1 1,140.8 (15.0) Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities ............................ 341.9 8.0 286.4 11.0 55.5 (3.0) Debt securities issued by foreign Governments ........................... 15.6 0.9 15.6 0.9 -- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total ............................... $4,862.5 $ 179.0 $3,666.2 $ 197.0 $1,196.3 $ (18.0) ==================================================================================== 39
10-Q40th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 40th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, there were gross unrealized gains of $573.7 million and $941.2 million, respectively, and gross unrealized losses of $363.3 million and $115.2 million, respectively, on the fixed maturities portfolio. As of March 31, 2005, gross unrealized losses of $363.3 million included $249.1 million, or 68.6%, concentrated in asset-backed/ and mortgage-backed securities, manufacturing, banking & finance and utilities securities. The tables above show gross unrealized losses before amounts that are allocated to the closed block policyholders or participating pension contractholders. Of the $363.3 million of gross unrealized losses in the portfolio at March 31, 2005, $63.4 million was in the closed block and $19.5 million has been allocated to participating pension contractholders, leaving $280.4 million of gross unrealized losses after such allocations. The December 31, 2004 gross unrealized losses of $115.2 million included $90.1 million, or 78.2%, concentrated in the utilities, manufacturing, banking & finance, and asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities. Of the $115.2 million of gross unrealized losses in the portfolio at December 31, 2004, $12.3 million was in the closed block and $6.7 million was allocated to participating pension contractholders, leaving $96.2 million of gross unrealized losses after such allocations. Unrealized losses can be created by rising interest rates or by rising credit concerns and hence widening credit spreads. Credit concerns are apt to play a larger role in the unrealized loss on below investment grade bonds and hence the gross unrealized loss on the portfolio has been split between investment grade and below investment grade fixed maturities in the above tables. The gross unrealized loss on investment grade fixed maturities (those rated in categories 1 and 2 by the SVO) increased by $196.5 million in the period ended March 31, 2005 to $293.7 million. The gross unrealized loss on below investment grade fixed maturities (those rated in categories 3, 4, 5 and 6 by the SVO) increased over this period, by $51.6 million, to a total of $69.6 million as of March 31, 2005. The increased gross unrealized losses as of March 31, 2005 compared to December 31, 2004 were largely due to an increasing interest rate environment since December 31, 2004. The following table shows the composition by credit quality of the securities with gross unrealized losses in the fixed maturity securities portfolio. Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Quality [Enlarge/Download Table] As of March 31, 2005 -------------------------------------------------------------- Carrying Value of SVO S&P Equivalent Securities with Gross % of Gross Unrealized % of Rating (1) Designation (2) Unrealized Losses (3) Total Losses (3) Total --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in millions) (in millions) 1 AAA/AA/A....................... $11,771.7 54.0% $(167.8) 47.7% 2 BBB............................ 8,330.7 38.3 (121.8) 34.6 3 BB............................. 1,121.3 5.2 (40.9) 11.6 4 B.............................. 402.7 1.8 (16.0) 4.6 5 CCC and lower.................. 126.2 0.6 (3.1) 0.9 6 In or near default............. 20.0 0.1 (2.3) 0.6 ------------------------------------------------------------- Subtotal.................. $21,772.6 100.0% $(351.9) 100.0% =========== ============ Redeemable preferred stock..... 323.3 (11.4) ------------------ -------------- Total..................... $22,095.9 $(363.3) ================== ============== (1) With respect to securities that are awaiting rating, the Company has assigned a rating based on an analysis that it believes is equivalent to that used by the SVO. (2) Comparisons between SVO and S&P ratings are published by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. (3) Includes 25 securities with gross unrealized losses that are awaiting an SVO rating with a carrying value of $275.5 million and unrealized losses of $6.2 million. Due to lags between the funding of an investment, the processing of final legal documents, the filing with the SVO, and the rating by the SVO, there will always be a number of unrated securities at each statement date. Unrated securities comprised 1.2% and 1.7% of the total carrying value and total gross unrealized losses of securities in a loss position, including redeemable preferred stock, respectively. 40
10-Q41st Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 41st
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Quality [Enlarge/Download Table] As of December 31, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------- Carrying Value of SVO S&P Equivalent Securities with Gross % of Gross Unrealized % of Rating (1) Designation (2) Unrealized Losses (3) Total Losses (3) Total --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in millions) (in millions) 1 AAA/AA/A......................... $ 5,774.2 55.5% $ (63.8) 56.7% 2 BBB.............................. 3,547.8 34.1 (32.7) 29.0 3 BB............................... 720.7 6.9 (9.5) 8.4 4 B................................ 302.6 2.9 (4.1) 3.6 5 CCC and lower.................... 42.2 0.4 (1.2) 1.1 6 In or near default............... 23.1 0.2 (1.3) 1.2 ------------------------------------------------------------- Subtotal.................. $10,410.6 100.0% $(112.6) 100.0% ========== ========== Redeemable preferred stock....... 380.0 (2.6) ---------------- --------------- Total..................... $10,790.6 $(115.2) ================ =============== (1) With respect to securities that are awaiting rating, the Company has assigned a rating based on an analysis that it believes is equivalent to that used by the SVO. (2) Comparisons between SVO and S&P ratings are published by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. (3) Includes 20 securities with gross unrealized losses are awaiting an SVO rating with a carrying value of $213.6 million and unrealized losses of $2.9 million. Due to lags between the funding of an investment, the processing of final legal documents, the filing with the SVO, and the rating by the SVO, there will always be a number of unrated securities at each statement date. Unrated securities comprised 2.0% and 2.5% of the total carrying value and total gross unrealized losses of securities in a loss position, including redeemable preferred stock, respectively. Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Investment Grade Category and Age [Enlarge/Download Table] As of March 31, 2005 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Investment Grade Below Investment Grade ------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Carrying Value of Carrying Value of Securities with Securities with Gross Unrealized Hedging Market Gross Unrealized Hedging Market Losses Adjustments Depreciation Losses Adjustments Depreciation ------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- (in millions) (in millions) Three months or less ................. $12,888.7 $ 38.2 $ (201.2) $ 1,022.8 $ 2.2 $ (44.2) Greater than three months to six months ......................... 3,162.6 7.0 (59.4) 270.5 0.5 (7.2) Greater than six months to nine months ........................ 437.7 0.5 (11.0) 22.4 0.1 (1.4) Greater than nine months to twelve months ...................... 3,613.4 4.6 (68.3) 354.5 2.4 (14.7) ------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Subtotal ........................ 20,102.4 50.3 (339.9) 1,670.2 5.2 (67.5) Redeemable preferred stock ........... 200.6 0.3 (4.4) 122.7 -- (7.3) ------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Total ........................... $20,303.0 $ 50.6 $ (344.3) $ 1,792.9 $ 5.2 $ (74.8) =========================================== ============================================ 41
10-Q42nd Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 42nd
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Investment Grade Category and Age [Enlarge/Download Table] As of March 31, 2004 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Investment Grade Below Investment Grade ------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Carrying Value of Carrying Value of Securities with Securities with Gross Unrealized Hedging Market Gross Unrealized Hedging Market Losses Adjustments Depreciation Losses Adjustments Depreciation ------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- (in millions) (in millions) Three months or less ................. $4,136.3 $ 3.5 $ (33.2) $ 351.3 $ (0.8) $ (1.9) Greater than three months to six months ......................... 652.3 (1.5) (16.6) 126.7 (0.5) (0.9) Greater than six months to nine months ........................ 4,533.5 0.7 (49.4) 610.5 (1.7) (10.3) ------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Subtotal ........................ 9,322.1 2.7 (99.2) 1,088.5 (3.0) (13.1) Redeemable preferred stock ........... 272.2 -- (0.7) 107.8 -- (1.9) ------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Total ........................... $9,594.3 $ 2.7 $ (99.9) $1,196.3 $ (3.0) $ (15.0) =========================================== ============================================ The tables above show the Company's investment grade and below investment grade securities that were in a loss position at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 by the amount of time the security has been in a loss position. Gross unrealized losses from hedging adjustments represent the amount of the unrealized loss that results from the security being designated as a hedged item in a fair value hedge. When a security is so designated, its cost basis is adjusted in response to movements in interest rates. These adjustments, which are non-cash and reverse with the passage of time as the asset and derivative mature, impact the amount of unrealized loss on a security. The remaining portion of the gross unrealized loss represents the impact of interest rates on the non-hedged portion of the portfolio and unrealized losses due to creditworthiness on the total fixed maturity portfolio. As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, fixed maturity securities had a total gross unrealized loss of $363.3 million and $115.2 million. The aging of securities reflects the mark to market on April 28, 2004. Unrealized losses on investment grade securities principally relate to changes in interest rates or changes in credit spreads since the securities were acquired. Credit rating agencies statistics indicate that investment grade securities have been found to be less likely to develop credit concerns. The scheduled maturity dates for securities in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 are shown below. Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Maturity [Enlarge/Download Table] March 31, 2005 December 31, 2004 --------------------------------------------------------- Carrying Value Carrying Value of Securities of Securities with Gross Gross with Gross Gross Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Losses Losses Losses Losses --------------------------------------------------------- (in millions) (in millions) Due in one year or less................................... $ 1,571.8 $ (17.9) $ 1,178.5 $ $(4.8) Due after one year through five years..................... 6,789.7 (108.4) 3,704.4 (25.0) Due after five years through ten years.................... 5,688.4 (90.5) 1,418.5 (17.0) Due after ten years....................................... 2,567.1 (63.2) 1,443.0 (19.3) --------------------------------------------------------- 16,617.0 (280.0) 7,744.4 (66.1) Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities............... 5,478.9 (83.3) 3,046.2 (49.1) --------------------------------------------------------- Total................................................ $22,095.9 $(363.3) $10,790.6 $(115.2) ========================================================= 42
10-Q43rd Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 43rd
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Mortgage Loans. As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Company held mortgage loans with a carrying value of $11.6 billion and $11.8 billion, respectively, including $2.7 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively, of agricultural loans and $8.9 billion of commercial loans for both periods. Impaired loans comprised 1.4% of the mortgage portfolio as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. The following table shows the Company's agricultural mortgage loan portfolio by its three major sectors: agri-business, timber and production agriculture. [Enlarge/Download Table] As of March 31, 2005 As of December 31, 2004 ------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- Amortized Carrying % of Total Amortized Carrying % of Total Cost Value Carrying Value Cost Value Carrying Value ------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- (in millions) (in millions) Agri-business .............. $1,685.3 $1,647.2 60.2% $1,821.9 $1,793.8 61.5% Timber ..................... 1,077.7 1,077.7 39.4 1,110.4 1,110.4 38.1 Production agriculture ..... 10.4 10.4 0.4 13.5 13.5 0.4 ------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- Total ................... $2,773.4 $2,735.3 100.0% $2,945.8 $2,917.7 100.0% ===================================== ========================================= The following table shows the distribution of the Company's mortgage loan portfolio by property type as of the dates indicated. The mortgage loan portfolio consists primarily of non-recourse fixed-rate mortgages on fully, or nearly fully, leased commercial properties. Mortgage Loans -- By Property Type [Enlarge/Download Table] As of March 31, 2005 As of December 31, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------- Carrying % of Carrying % of Value Total Value Total ------------------------------------------------------------- (in millions) (in millions) Apartment.......................... $ 1,633.5 14.1% $ 1,645.0 13.9% Office Buildings................... 2,308.5 19.9 2,396.8 20.3 Retail............................. 2,814.8 24.3 2,677.7 22.8 Agricultural....................... 2,735.3 23.6 2,917.7 24.7 Industrial......................... 988.9 8.5 1,004.5 8.5 Hotels............................. 432.0 3.7 437.6 3.7 Mixed Use.......................... 418.5 3.6 433.0 3.7 Other.............................. 269.1 2.3 280.3 2.4 ------------------------------------------------------------- Total......................... $11,600.6 100.0% $11,792.6 100.0% ============================================================= The following table shows the distribution of the mortgage loan portfolio by geographical region, as defined by the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI). Mortgage Loans -- By ACLI Region [Enlarge/Download Table] As of March 31, 2005 As of December 31, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number Carrying % of Carrying % of Of Loans Value Total Value Total -------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in millions) (in millions) East North Central....... 139 $ 1,201.6 10.4% $ 1,229.0 10.4% East South Central....... 37 457.7 4.0 473.1 4.0 Middle Atlantic.......... 120 1,684.5 14.5 1,690.1 14.4 Mountain................. 94 747.6 6.4 746.4 6.3 New England.............. 95 947.9 8.2 932.0 7.9 Pacific.................. 271 2,580.0 22.2 2,529.7 21.5 South Atlantic........... 203 2,363.0 20.4 2,535.9 21.5 West North Central....... 69 409.6 3.5 408.4 3.5 West South Central....... 116 936.9 8.1 972.2 8.2 Canada/Other............. 11 271.8 2.3 275.8 2.3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total............... 1,155 $11,600.6 100.0% $11,792.6 100.0% ========================================================================== 43
10-Q44th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 44th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY The following table shows the carrying values of the mortgage loan portfolio that are delinquent but not in foreclosure, delinquent and in foreclosure, restructured and foreclosed. The table also shows the respective ratios of these items to the total carrying value of the mortgage loan portfolio. Mortgage loans are classified as delinquent when they are 60 days or more past due as to the payment of interest or principal. Mortgage loans are classified as restructured when they are in good standing, but the basic terms, such as interest rate or maturity date, have been modified as a result of a prior actual delinquency or an imminent delinquency. All foreclosure decisions are based on a thorough assessment of the property's quality and location and market conditions. The decision may also reflect a plan to invest additional capital in a property to make tenant improvements or renovations to secure a higher resale value at a later date. Following foreclosure, management relies on its real estate investment group's ability to manage foreclosed real estate for eventual return to investment real estate status or outright sale. Mortgage Loan Comparisons [Enlarge/Download Table] 2005 2004 ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ Carrying % of Total Carrying % of Total Value Mortgage Loans (1) Value Mortgage Loans (1) ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ (in millions) (in millions) Delinquent, not in foreclosure ............... $ -- -- $ 0.5 -- Delinquent, in foreclosure ................... 1.4 -- 1.4 -- Restructured ................................. 92.5 0.8% 107.3 0.9% All other loans with a valuation allowance ... 25.7 0.2 25.8 0.2 ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ Total ..................................... $119.6 1.0% $135.0 1.1% ===================================== ==================================== Valuation allowance .......................... $ 55.3 $ 45.3 ============= ============ (1) As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 the Company held mortgage loans with a carrying value of $11.6 billion and $11.8 billion, respectively. The valuation allowance is maintained at a level that is adequate enough to absorb estimated probable credit losses. Management's periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for losses is based on past experience, known and inherent risks, adverse situations that may affect the borrower's ability to repay (including the timing of future payments), the estimated value of the underlying security, the general composition of the portfolio, current economic conditions and other factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective and is susceptible to significant changes and no assurance can be given that the allowances taken will in fact be adequate to cover all losses or that additional valuation allowances or asset write-downs will not be required in the future. The valuation allowance for the mortgage loan portfolio was $55.3 million, or 0.5% of the carrying value of the portfolio as of March 31, 2005. There were no foreclosed loans during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004. 44
10-Q45th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 45th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Investment Results Net Investment Income. The following table summarizes the Company's investment results for the periods indicated. [Enlarge/Download Table] For the Three Months Ended March 31 , ------------------------------------------------------ 2005 2004 Yield Amount Yield Amount ------------------------------------------------------ (in millions) (in millions) General account assets-excluding policy loans Gross income ......................................... 5.43% $ 866.2 6.00% $ 993.1 Ending invested assets, excluding policy loans (1) ... 62,900.2 67,565.9 Policy loans Gross income ......................................... 6.18% 31.1 5.83% 29.4 Ending assets ........................................ 2,018.4 2,014.2 ------------ ------------ Total gross income ................................... 5.45% 897.3 5.99% 1,022.5 Less: investment expenses ............................ (33.0) (39.0) ------------ ------------ Net investment income .............................. 5.25% $ 864.3 5.77% $ 983.5 ============ ============ (1) Cash and cash equivalents are included in invested assets in the table above for the purposes of calculating yields on income producing assets for the Company. Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 Net investment income decreased $119.2 million from comparable prior year period. The yield for the three months ended March 31, 2005, net of investment expenses, on the general account portfolio decreased to 5.25% from 5.77% for the three months ended March 31, 2004. In summary, the change in yields was driven by the following factors: o On April 28, 2004, as a result of Manulife's acquisition of John Hancock, assets were marked to market in accordance with purchase accounting rules. The impact of the asset adjustment and related amortization was a reduction in yield of approximately 56 basis points for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the prior year. o As of March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004, the Company's asset portfolio had approximately $12 billion of floating-rate exposure (primarily LIBOR). This exposure was created mostly through interest rate swaps designed to match the floating-rate liability portfolio. As of March 31, 2005, approximately 84% of this exposure, excluding cash and short-term investments, was directly offset by exposure to floating-rate liabilities. Most of the remaining 16% of exposure is in floating rate assets acquired for their relative value and is accounted for in the portfolio's interest rate risk management plan. The impact was a reduction of approximately 14 basis points for the first quarter of 2005 compared to a reduction of 50 basis points for the first quarter of 2004. o In 2005, weighted-average invested assets decreased $1,007.4 million, or 1.5%, from the prior year. These declines have occurred in higher-yielding investments. Additionally, new investments have been at rates below the existing portfolio rates. These two factors account for the majority of the remaining decline in the portfolio yield. o Investment expenses were reduced $6.0 million in the three month period ended March 31, 2005 compared to the prior year as a result of synergies created subsequent to the Manulife acquisition. 45
10-Q46th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 46th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Net Realized Investment and Other Gain/(Loss). The following table shows the Company's net realized investment and other gains (losses) by asset class for the periods presented: [Enlarge/Download Table] For the Three Months ended March 31, 2005 Gross Gain Gross Loss Hedging Net Realized Investment Impairment on Disposal on Disposal Adjustments and Other Gain/(Loss) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in millions) Fixed maturity securities (1)........... $ (28.0) $ 82.8 $ (9.9) $ 5.3 $ 50.2 Equity securities....................... (0.6) 1.3 (0.5) -- 0.2 Mortgage loans on real estate........... (10.0) 2.4 (0.7) 1.9 (6.4) Real estate............................. -- -- (0.8) -- (0.8) Other invested assets................... (13.2) 2.3 (0.3) -- (11.2) Derivatives............................. -- -- -- 60.5 60.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subtotal................. $ (51.8) $ 88.8 $ (12.2) $ 67.7 $ 92.5 ============================================================================ Amortization adjustment for deferred policy acquisition costs...................... 4.0 Amounts credited to participating pension contractholders.......................... 45.9 Amounts credited to the policyholder dividend obligation........................... 14.9 ---------------------- Total......................................................................... $ 157.3 ====================== (1) Fixed maturities loss on disposals includes $0.2 million of credit related losses. The hedging adjustments in the fixed maturities and mortgage loans asset classes are non-cash adjustments representing the amortization or reversal of prior fair value adjustments on assets in those classes that were or are designated as hedged items in a fair value hedge. When an asset or liability is so designated, its cost basis is adjusted in response to movement in interest rates. These adjustments are non-cash and reverse with the passage of time as the asset or liability and derivative mature. The hedging adjustments on the derivatives represent non-cash adjustments on derivative instruments and on assets and liabilities designated as hedged items reflecting the change in fair value of those items. For the three months ended March 31, 2005 the Company's net realized investment and other gains and losses was a gain of $157.3 million compared to a loss of $97.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. For the three months ended March 31, 2005 gross losses on impairments and on disposal of investments - including bonds, equities, real estate, mortgages and other invested assets was $64.0 million, excluding hedging adjustments, compared to $96.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, realized gains on disposal of fixed maturities, excluding hedging adjustments, were $82.8 million. These gains resulted from prepayments with make-whole provisions and from ongoing portfolio positioning. There were no recoveries on sales of previously impaired securities for the three months ended March 31, 2005. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company realized losses on the disposal of fixed maturities, excluding hedging adjustments, of $9.9 million. The Company generally intends to hold securities in unrealized loss positions until they mature or recover. However, fixed maturities are sold under certain circumstances such as when new information causes a change in the assessment of whether a bond will recover or perform according to its contractual terms, in response to external events (such as a merger or a downgrade) that result in investment guideline violations (such as single issuer or overall portfolio credit quality limits), in response to extreme catastrophic events (such as September 11, 2001) that result in industry or market wide disruption, or to take advantage of tender offers. Sales generate both gains and losses. The Company has a process in place to identify securities that could potentially have an impairment that is other than temporary. This process involves monitoring market events that could impact issuers' credit ratings, business climate, management changes, litigation and government actions, and other similar factors. This process also involves monitoring late payments, downgrades by rating agencies, key financial ratios, financial statements, revenue forecasts and cash flow projections as indicators of credit issues. At the end of each quarter, the Company's Investment Review Committee reviews all securities where market value is less than ninety percent of amortized cost for three months or more to determine whether impairments need to be taken. This committee includes the head of workouts, the head of each industry team, the head of portfolio management, and the Chief Credit Officer of Manulife. The analysis focuses on each company's or project's ability to service its debts in a timely fashion and the length of time the security has been 46
10-Q47th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 47th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY trading below cost. The results of this analysis are reviewed by the Credit Committee at Manulife. This committee includes Manulife's Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer, Chief Risk Officer, and Chief Credit Officer. This quarterly process includes a fresh assessment of the credit quality of each investment in the entire fixed maturities portfolio. The Company considers relevant facts and circumstances in evaluating whether the impairment of a security is other than temporary. Relevant facts and circumstances considered include (1) the length of time the fair value has been below cost; (2) the financial position of the issuer, including the current and future impact of any specific events; and (3) the company's ability and intent to hold the security to maturity or until it recovers in value. To the extent the Company determines that a security is deemed to be other than temporarily impaired the difference between amortized cost and fair value would be charged to earnings. There are a number of significant risks and uncertainties inherent in the process of monitoring impairments and determining if an impairment is other than temporary. These risks and uncertainties include (1) the risk that the assessment of an issuer's ability to meet all of its contractual obligations will change based on changes in the credit characteristics of that issuer, (2) the risk that the economic outlook will be worse than expected or have more of an impact on the issuer than anticipated, (3) fraudulent information could be provided to the Company's investment professionals who determine the fair value estimates and other than temporary impairments, and (4) the risk that new information obtained or changes in other facts and circumstances lead to change management's intent to hold the security to maturity or until it recovers in value. Any of these situations could result in a charge to earnings in a future period. Realized Gains, Losses and Impairments on Disposals - Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 Of the $9.9 million of realized losses on sales of fixed maturity securities for the three months ended March 31, 2005, there was a total of $0.2 million in credit losses. Most of the sales were related to general portfolio management, and the losses resulted from increasing interest rates during the period. The Company recorded $28.0 million of other than temporary impairments of fixed maturity securities for the three months ended March 31, 2005. These impairments relate to: a privately held pharmaceutical company ($19.8 million), private fixed maturities of a power company ($5.0 million), and private fixed maturities of a company in the resort industry ($3.2 million). The Company recorded losses due to other than temporary impairments of other invested assets of $13.2 million for three months ended March 31, 2005. These impairments relate to investments in: an electricity generating project ($8.9 million) and a company in the entertainment industry ($4.3 million). There were no impairments on CBO and CDO equity for the period. Equity in these CBOs and CDOs take the first loss risk in a pool of high yield debt. The total remaining carrying value was $34.1 million and $34.9 million of CBO and CDO equity as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, which is currently supported by expected cash flows. The Company also recognized losses on other than temporary impairments of common stock of $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as a result of market values falling below cost for more than six months. The Company recorded a net loss of $6.4 million on mortgage loans for the three months ended March 31, 2005 (which is net of $1.9 million in hedging adjustment gains). Also included in this loss is $10.0 million in impairments. These impairments relate to mortgages on a refrigeration warehouse company. There were also gains of $1.3 million on the sale of equity securities as part of the Company's overall investment strategy of using equity gains to offset credit losses in the long term, and gains of $2.3 million from the sale of other invested assets for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Net derivative activity resulted in a gain of $60.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 resulting from a slightly larger impact from interest rate changes on the Company's fair value of hedged items in comparison to the changes in fair value of its derivatives hedging those items and the change in the fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting 47
10-Q48th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 48th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Liquidity and Capital Resources Liquidity describes the ability of a company to generate sufficient cash flows to meet the immediate capital needs to facilitate business operations. The assets of the Company include a diversified investment portfolio and investments in operating subsidiaries. The Company's cash flow consists primarily of premiums, deposits, investment income, results of its operating subsidiaries and proceeds from the Company's debt offerings offset by benefits paid to contractholders, operating expenses, policyholder dividends to its participating policyholders and shareholder dividends to its parent company. All of the outstanding common stock of John Hancock Life Insurance Company is owned by its Parent, an insurance holding company, John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. State insurance laws generally restrict the ability of insurance companies to pay cash dividends in excess of prescribed limitations without prior approval. The Company's limit is the greater of 10% of its statutory surplus at prior year-end or the prior calendar year's statutory net gain from operations of the Company. The ability of the Company to pay shareholder dividends is and will continue to be subject to restrictions set forth in the insurance laws and regulations of Massachusetts, its domiciliary state. The Massachusetts insurance law limits how and when the Company can pay shareholder dividends. The Company, in the future could also be viewed as being commercially domiciled in New York. If so, dividend payments may also be subject to New York's holding company act as well as Massachusetts' law. The Company currently does not expect such regulatory requirements to impair its ability to meet its liquidity and capital needs. Sources of cash for the Company include premiums, deposits and charges on policies and contracts, investment income, maturing investments, and proceeds from sales of investment assets. In addition to the need for cash flow to meet operating expenses, the Company's liquidity requirements relate principally to the liabilities associated with various life insurance, annuity, and structured investment products, and to the funding of investments in new products, processes, and technologies. Product liabilities include the payment of benefits under life insurance, annuity and structured investment products and the payment of policy surrenders, withdrawals and policy loans. The Company periodically adjusts its investment policy to respond to changes in short-term and long-term cash requirements and provide adequate funds to pay benefits without forced sales of investments. The Company's relative liquidity is reflected in its credit ratings assigned by the major credit rating agencies. At March 31, 2005, The Company's financial strength / claims paying abilities were all rated AA+ by Standard & Poor's Rating Services, a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (S&P), Aa3 by Moody's Investors Service (Moody's), A++ by A.M. Best Company and AA+ by Fitch Ratings (Fitch). The Company's senior unsecured debt rating was AA+ from S&P and A1 from Moody's. The liquidity of the Company's insurance operations is also related to the overall quality of its investments. As of March 31, 2005, $41,264.7 million, or 90.3% of the fixed maturity securities held by the Company and rated by S&P or the National Association of Insurance Commissioners were rated investment grade (BBB- or higher by S&P, Baa3 or higher for Moody's, or 1 or 2 by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners). The remaining $4,370.5 million or 9.7% of fixed maturity investments were rated non-investment grade. For additional discussion of the Company's investment portfolio see the General Account Investments section of this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Segment Operations. The Company employs an asset/liability management approach tailored to the specific requirements of each of its product lines. Each product line has an investment strategy based on the specific characteristics of the liabilities in the product line. As part of this approach, the Company develops investment policies and operating guidelines for each portfolio based upon the return objectives, risk tolerance, liquidity, and tax and regulatory requirements of the underlying products and business segments. 48
10-Q49th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 49th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY The risk-based capital standards for life insurance companies, as prescribed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, establish a risk-based capital ratio comparing adjusted surplus to required surplus for each of the Company's United States domiciled insurance subsidiaries. If the risk-based capital ratio falls outside of acceptable ranges, regulatory action may be taken ranging from increased information requirements to mandatory control by the domiciliary insurance department. The risk-based capital ratios of all the Company and its insurance subsidiaries as of March 31, 2005, were above the ranges that would require regulatory action. The Company maintains reinsurance programs designed to protect against large or unusual losses. Based on the Company's periodic review of its reinsurers' financial statements, financial strength ratings and reputations in the reinsurance marketplace, the Company believes that its reinsurers are financially sound, and, therefore, that the Company has no significant exposure to uncollectible reinsurance in excess of uncollectible amounts recognized in its consolidated financial statements. Analysis of Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows Net cash provided by operating activities was $ 554.9 million and $ 536.6 million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Cash flows from operating activities are affected by the timing of premiums received, fees received, investment income and the payment of policy related costs. The $ 18.3 million increase in the first three months of 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004 is largely attributable to a $ 100.6 million decrease in policyholder benefits and dividends paid, and a $ 26.8 million decrease in income taxes paid, offset by a $ 86.0 million change to other assets net of other liabilities, and a $ 25.8 million decrease in investment income received. Net cash provided by investing activities was $348.4 million and $ (760.0) million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Changes in the cash provided by investing activities primarily relate to the management of the Company's investment portfolios and the investment of excess capital generated by operating and financing activities. The $1,108.4 million increase in cash provided in the first three months of 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004 is largely attributable to a $ 1,075.6 million decrease in net acquisition of fixed maturity securities, a $ 227.7 million decrease in net acquisition of short-term investments and other invested assets, offset by a $ 170.0 million increase in net acquisition of equity securities, and a $ 97.4 million increase in net acquisition of mortgage loans. Net cash provided by financing activities was $ (1,309.8) million and $ 24.4 million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Changes in cash provided by financing activities primarily relate to excess deposits or withdrawals under investment type contracts, the issuance of debt and borrowings or re-payments of the Company's debt. The $ 1,334.2 million decrease in net cash provided by financing activities in the first three months of 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004 was driven by a decrease in deposits and an increase in cash payments made on withdrawals of universal life insurance and investment-type contracts totaling $ 1,133.1 million, and a decrease in funds from the issuance of consumer notes of $ 197.7 million. The Company's ability to generate customer deposits in excess of maturities and withdrawals on universal life insurance and investment-type contracts is critical to long-term growth. Withdrawals exceeded deposits by $ 1,344.8 million and by $ 211.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. 49
10-Q50th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 50th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Lines of Credit, Debt and Guarantees At March 31, 2005 the Company had two separate committed lines of credit: one of $500 million, through a syndication of banks including Fleet National Bank, JPMorgan Chase, Citicorp USA, Credit Suisse First Boston, The Bank of New York, Barclays, The Bank of Nova Scotia, Wachovia, Royal Bank of Canada, State Street Bank, Bank of America, Bank One, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank, PNC Bank, Sovereign Bank, Westdeutsche Landesbank, Comerica Bank and Northern Trust (the "external line of credit"); the second of $1.0 billion with the Company's parent, Manulife (the "Manulife line of credit"). The external line of credit agreement provides for a multi-year facility for $500 million which expires on August 3, 2005 and will not be renewed. The external line of credit is available for general corporate purposes. The external line of credit agreement has no material adverse change clause, and includes, among others, the following covenants: minimum requirements for JHFS shareholder's equity, maximum limit on the capitalization ratio and a negative pledge clause (with exceptions) as well as limitations on subsidiary debt, none of which were triggered as of March 31, 2005. The external line of credit also contains cross-acceleration provisions, none of which were triggered as of March 31, 2005. The fee structure of the external line of credit is determined by the rating levels of JHFS or the Company. To date, the Company has not borrowed any amounts under the external lines of credit as of March 31, 2005. The Manulife line of credit agreement provides for a 364-day credit facility for $1.0 billion. Manulife will commit, when requested, to loan funds at prevailing interest rates as determined in accordance with the line of credit agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company is required to maintain certain minimum levels of net worth and comply with certain other covenants, which were met at March 31, 2005. To date, the Company has not borrowed any amounts under the external or Manulife lines of credit as of March 31, 2005. As of March 31, 2005, the Company had $ 664.6 million of principal and interest amounts of debt outstanding consisting of $516.4 million of surplus notes, $ 21.7 million of other notes payable, $112.8 million non-recourse debt for Signature Fruit and an Australian farm management subsidiary, and $ 13.7 million SFAS No. 133 fair value adjustment to interest rate swaps held for the surplus notes. In addition, the Company has outstanding $ 2,456.0 million of consumer notes which are redeemable upon the death of the holder, subject to an annual overall program redemption limitation of 1% of the aggregate securities outstanding, or an individual redemption limitation of $ 200,000 of aggregate principal, and mature at a various dates in the future. Covenants in this program include, among others, limitations on liens. In the course of business the Company enters into guarantees which vary in nature and purpose and which are accounted for and disclosed under accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. specific to the insurance industry. The Company has no material guarantees outstanding outside the scope of insurance accounting at March 31, 2005. Off Balance Sheet Arrangements The Company has relationships with a number of entities which are not consolidated into the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. These entities include qualified special purpose entities (QSPEs) and other special purpose entities. In the course of some of its business the Company transfers assets to, and in some cases, retains interests in QSPEs. The Company may also purchase interests in QSPEs on the open market. The Company's primary use of QSPEs arises in its commercial mortgage banking subsidiary. The Company's commercial mortgage banking subsidiary originates commercial mortgages and sells them to QSPEs which then issue mortgage backed securities (MBS). The Company engages in this activity to earn fees during the origination process, and to generate realized gains during the securitization process. The Company may purchase MBS from the QSPEs which buy the Company's mortgages, in order to generate net investment income. The majority of the Company's MBS portfolio was purchased from QSPEs to which the Company has not sold mortgages. 50
10-Q51st Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 51st
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY These QSPEs and other special purpose entities also include CDO funds the Company manages and may also invest in, which are considered variable interest entities and are discussed in detail in Note 4 - Relationships with the Variable Interest Entities in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company's 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company generates fee income from the CDO funds it manages, and generates net investment income from CDOs it invests in, whether it manage them or not. The Company receives Federal income tax benefits from certain investments made through variable interest entities. These relationships also include credit and collateral support agreements with FNMA and FHMLC, through which the Company securitized some of its mortgage investments, which provided a potential source of liquidity to the Company. These arrangements also include credit and collateral support agreements with FNMA and FHMLC, through which the Company securitized some of its mortgage investments, which provided a potential source of liquidity to the Company. The Company's risk of loss from these entities is limited to its investment in them. Consolidation of unconsolidated accounts from these entities would inflate the Company's balance sheet but would not be reflective of additional risk in these entities. In each, there are no potential liabilities which might arise in the future as a result of these relationships that would not be completely satisfied by the assets of the entity involved. Given the historical cash flows of the Company and its current financial results, management believes that the cash flow from the operating activities over the next year will provide sufficient liquidity for its operations, its debt service obligations and other operating expenses. Although it anticipates that it will be able to meet its cash requirements, the Company can give no assurances in this regard. 51
10-Q52nd Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 52nd
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Forward-Looking Statements The statements, analyses, and other information contained in this Management's Discussion and analysis (MD&A) and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, in connection with the merger with John Hancock and Manulife Financial Corporation, relating to trends in the John Hancock Life Insurance Company's (the Company's) operations and financial results, the markets for the Company's products, the future development of the Company's business, and the contingencies and uncertainties to which the Company may be subject, as well as other statements including words such as "anticipate," "believe," "plan," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "will," "should," "may," and other similar expressions, are "forward-looking statements" under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are made based upon management's current expectations and beliefs concerning future events and their effects on the Company. Future events and their effects on the Company may not be those anticipated by management. The Company's actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the risks that (1) a significant downgrade in the Company's ratings for claims-paying ability and financial strength may lead to policy and contract withdrawals and materially harm its ability to market its products; (2) new laws and regulations, including the recently enacted Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or changes to existing laws or regulations, (including, but not limited to, those relating to the Federal Estate Tax Laws and the proposed Bush Administration tax and savings initiatives), and the applications and interpretations given to these laws and regulations, may adversely affect the Company's sales of insurance and investment advisory products; (3) Massachusetts insurance law may restrict the ability of John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company to pay dividends to us; (4) the Company faces increasing competition in its retail businesses from mutual fund companies, banks and investment management firms as well as from other insurance companies; (5) declines or increased volatility in the securities markets, and other economic factors, may adversely affect the Company's business, particularly its variable life insurance, mutual fund, variable annuity and investment business; (6) due to acts of terrorism or other hostilities, there could be business disruption, economic contraction, increased mortality, morbidity and liability risks, generally, or investment losses that could adversely affect business; (7) the Company's life insurance sales are highly dependent on a third party distribution relationship; (8) customers may not be responsive to new or existing products or distribution channels, (9) interest rate volatility may adversely affect profitability; (10) the Company's net income and revenues will suffer if customers surrender annuities and variable and universal life insurance policies or redeem shares of its open-end mutual funds; (11) the independent trustees of the Company's variable series trusts and of its mutual funds could reduce the compensation paid or could terminate the Company's contracts to manage the funds; (12) under the Plan of Reorganization, the Company was required to establish the closed block, a special arrangement for the benefit of a group of its policyholders. It may have to fund deficiencies in the closed block, and any over-funding of the closed block will benefit only the holders of policies included in the closed block, not the sole shareholder; (13) the Company faces investment and credit losses relating to its investment portfolio, including, without limitation, the risk associated with the evaluation and determination by its investment professionals of the fair values of investments as well as whether or not any investments have been impaired on an other than temporary basis; (14) the Company may experience volatility in net income due to changes in standards for accounting for derivatives and other changes; (15) the Company is subject to risk-based capital requirements and possible guaranty fund assessments; (16) it may be unable to retain personnel who are key to the business; (17) the Company may incur losses from assumed reinsurance business in respect of personal accident insurance and the occupational accident component of workers compensation insurance; (18) litigation and regulatory proceedings may result in financial losses, harm its reputation and divert management resources; (19) the Company may face unforeseen liabilities arising from its acquisitions and dispositions of businesses, and (20) the Company may incur multiple life insurance claims as a result of a catastrophic event which, because of higher deductibles and lower limits under reinsurance arrangements, could adversely affect its future net income and financial position Readers are also directed to other risks and uncertainties discussed, as well as to further discussion of the risks described above, in other documents that may be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. The Company specifically disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise. 52
10-Q53rd Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 53rd
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ITEM 4. CONTROLS and PROCEDURES An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. No change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 14-15f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting. PART II - OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 6. EXHIBITS Exhibit Number Description ------ ----------- 31.1 Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 * 31.2 Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 * 32.1 Chief Executive Officer certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 * 32.2 Chief Financial Officer certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 * ---------- * Filed herewith. 53
10-QLast Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 54th
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Date: May 16, 2005 By: /s/ STEVEN FINCH ----------------- Steven Finch Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 54

Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated by Reference

Referenced-On Page
This ‘10-Q’ Filing    Date First  Last      Other Filings
12/31/05102113F-HR,  13F-HR/A
8/3/0550
Filed on:5/16/05548-K
5/9/0518-K
4/1/0512
For Period End:3/31/0515010-K,  13F-HR,  13F-HR/A
3/8/0519424B2,  424B5,  8-K
3/7/05198-K
3/1/0521424B2,  424B5,  8-K
1/1/05524
12/31/0434710-K,  13F-HR,  13F-HR/A
7/1/0431
4/29/04924
4/28/048458-K
3/31/0444910-Q,  13F-HR,  13F-HR/A
1/1/04524
12/31/033110-K,  13F-HR,  13F-HR/A
12/8/0325
9/30/03810-Q,  13F-HR,  13F-HR/A,  424B2
9/28/038118-K
9/25/038
7/7/0311
1/1/0311
7/1/0231
1/1/0225
9/11/013546
1/1/0131
1/1/922526
 List all Filings 
Top
Filing Submission 0001171520-05-000217   –   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)

Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Wed., May 8, 6:36:58.2pm ET