SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004

Commission File Number
000-23115

CTI INDUSTRIES CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

(847) 382-1000
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

Securities registered pursuant to Sections 12(b) and 12(g) of the Act:

                Check whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

                Check if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated in Part III of the Form 10-K or any amendment to the Form 10-K.  o

                The Registrant’s revenues for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, were $37,193,109

                Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2)  o Yes x  No

                Based upon the closing price of $2.15 per share of Registrant’s Common Stock as reported on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market at June 30, 2004, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was then approximately $2,049,907 (Determination of stock ownership by non-affiliates was made solely for the purpose of responding to the requirements of the Form and the Registrant is not bound by this determination for any other purpose).

                The number of shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of April 15, 2005 was 1,954,100 (excluding treasury shares).

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): o Yes x  No

PART I

Item No. 1 Description of Business

Business Overview

CTI Industries Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) is engaged in the development, manufacture, sale and distribution of two principal lines of products within a single segment:

The Company was organized in 1976 and initially was principally engaged in the business of manufacturing bag-in-box plastic packaging systems. The Company sold its assets related to bag-in-box packaging systems in 1985. In 1978, the Company began manufacturing metalized balloons (sometimes referred to as “foil” balloons), balloons made of a base material (usually nylon) having vacuum deposited aluminum and polyethylene coatings. These balloons remain buoyant when filled with helium for much longer periods than latex balloons and permit the printing of graphic designs on the surface.

In 1985, the Company began marketing latex balloons and, in 1988, began manufacturing latex balloons. In 1994, the Company sold its latex balloon manufacturing equipment to a company in Mexico and entered into an arrangement for that company to manufacture latex balloons for the Company. The Company since has acquired majority ownership of the Mexican latex manufacturing company.

The Company’s metalized and latex balloons and toy products are sold throughout the United States and in several foreign countries through a wide variety of retail outlets including general merchandise and drugstore chains, grocery chains, card and gift shops, and party goods stores, as well as through florists and balloon decorators.

Most metalized balloons contain printed characters, designs and social expression messages. The Company maintains licenses on numerous characters and designs, including, for example, Garfield^®, Precious Moments^®, Elephantz^®, Face Offs-Tudes^®, Headfirst^®, Kinka^® and Successories^®.  The Company also has licenses in Mexico for Shrek^®, Shark Tales^®, and Barbie^®. In the UK, the Company maintains licenses on Postman Pat^® and Dream Fairies^®. For a period of three years, the Company did maintain a relationship with Hallmark Cards under which the Company (i) produced balloons of Hallmark designs, and of designs licensed by Hallmark, under authority from Hallmark, (ii) sold such balloons, as well as latex balloons, to Hallmark for resale by Hallmark, and (iii) sold and distributed these balloon designs to customers in the United States. This arrangement and the agreements related to it expired and were terminated on March 31, 2005. The Company has an 18 month period in which to sell off its inventory of Hallmark products.

On an increasing basis over the past six years, the Company also has engaged in the production, lamination, coating and printing of films and provides custom film products for a variety of commercial applications. These include (i) laminated and printed films for use in packaging applications and (ii) completed products for customer storage applications and for packaging applications. Revenues from this activity have grown rapidly since 1997. Though experiencing a decline in 2004, these revenues still represented approximately 37.2% of total Company revenues.

Background

CTI Industries Corporation (the “Company”) was incorporated as Container Merger Company, Inc. under the laws of the State of Delaware on October 14, 1983, and changed its name to CTI Industries Corporation on August 2, 1985. A predecessor company, Creative Technology, Inc., was organized as an Illinois corporation on December 9, 1975 and was merged into the Company in February 1984. On November 19, 2001, the Company was reincorporated in Illinois and is now an Illinois corporation. CTI Balloons Limited. (“CTI Balloons”), the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, was organized as a corporation under the laws of the United Kingdom on October 2, 1996. On October 24, 1996, the Company entered into an agreement with CTI Balloons pursuant to which all of the assets and liabilities of the Company in its branch operation in the United Kingdom were sold and transferred to CTI Balloons and all of the capital stock of CTI Balloons was issued and delivered to the Company. Unless otherwise specified, all references to the Company refer to the Company, its predecessor Creative Technology, Inc., its wholly-owned subsidiaries, CTI Balloons, CTF International, S.A. de C.V., and its majority-owned subsidiaries, CTI Mexico, S.A. de C.V. and Flexo Universal, S.A. de C.V.

In March and May of 1996, a group of investors made an equity investment of $1,000,000 in the Company in return for 366,300 shares of Preferred Stock, $.91 par value. Each share of Preferred Stock was entitled to an annual cumulative dividend of 13% of the purchase price, and was convertible into one share of Common Stock. The shares of Preferred Stock, voting separately as a class, were entitled to elect four of the Company’s directors. Members of such investment group included Howard W. Schwan, John H. Schwan and Stephen M. Merrick, current members of management.

In July 1997, the Company effected a recapitalization (the “Recapitalization”) without a formal reorganization. As part of the Recapitalization, the Board of Directors approved the creation of Class B Common Stock, approved a 1 for 2.6 reverse stock split on both the Common Stock and Preferred Stock, and negotiated a conversion of all then outstanding shares of the Company’s Convertible Preferred Stock into an aggregate of 366,300 shares of Class B Common Stock. The conversion was effective upon the closing of an initial public offering of 575,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock on November 5, 1997. The shares of Class B Common Stock contained rights identical to shares of Common Stock, except that shares of Class B Common Stock, voting separately as a class, had the right to elect four of the Company’s seven directors. Shares of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, voting together as a class, voted on all other matters, including the election of the remaining directors. The recapitalization, initial public offering and related transactions were approved by written consent of the shareholders.

2

On July 1, 2002, all outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock, by their terms, were converted to common stock.

On October 15, 1999, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a 1 for 3 reverse split of the Company’s Common Stock and Class B Common Stock. The 1 for 3 reverse stock split became effective at the close of business on November 4, 1999, upon the approval and consent of a majority of Common and Class B Common Stockholders voting together as a single class. As a result of the reverse stock split, every three shares of the Company’s Common Stock were reclassified and changed into one share of the Company’s Common Stock with a new par value of $.195 per share, and every three shares of the Company’s Class B Common Stock were reclassified and changed into one share of the Company’s Class B Common Stock, with a new par value of $2.73 per share. After the reincorporation of the Company in the State of Illinois, the Company’s Common and Class B Common Stock ceased to have any par value.

On December 13, 2002, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a stock dividend of one share of Common Stock for each 5.25 shares of Common Stock outstanding. The record date for the dividend was December 27, 2002. Except for the elimination of par values and as otherwise indicated, share figures in this document have been restated to reflect the stock splits and stock dividends described above.

Mexico Operations.  Through March 2003, the Company’s latex balloons were manufactured by CTI Mexico S.A. de C.V. (“CTI Mexico”), formerly known as Pulidos y Terminados Finos S.A. de C.V., a Guadalajara, Mexico company engaged principally in the manufacture of latex balloons. Commencing in March 2003, the Company’s latex balloons have been manufactured by Flexo Universal, S.A. de C.V. (“Flexo Universal”). Both CTI Mexico and Flexo Universal are majority owned subsidiaries of the Company.

In 1995, the Company entered into an agreement with CTI Mexico under which (i) the Company sold to CTI Mexico all of its latex balloon manufacturing equipment (for the manufacture of decorator balloons), (ii) CTI Mexico agreed for a period of 10 years to supply balloons exclusively to the Company for sale in the United States and Canada manufactured on such equipment and (iii) for such 10 year period, CTI Mexico agreed to supply to the Company, exclusively in the United States except as to two other companies, all balloons manufactured by CTI Mexico. Commencing in 1996, CTI Mexico began manufacturing latex balloons for the Company.

In a series of transactions during the period 1998 through 2002, the Company acquired capital stock of CTI Mexico and, by August 2002, had acquired 98% ownership of CTI Mexico.

Through March 2003, CTI Mexico conducted operations at four facilities in Guadalajara, Mexico having, in total, approximately 95,000 square feet of manufacturing, office and warehouse space. At these facilities, CTI Mexico produced, printed and packaged latex balloons, warehoused latex and foil balloons and conducted sales, marketing and administrative activities.

On February 22, 2003, CTI Mexico effected a spin off under Mexico law under which a portion of the assets, liabilities and capital of CTI Mexico were transferred to a newly-organized entity

3

which operates under the name Flexo Universal S.A. de C.V. Flexo Universal is also 98% owned by the Company.

In January 2003, Flexo Universal entered into a lease for approximately 43,000 square feet of manufacturing, office and warehouse space in Guadalajara, Mexico and all of the assets transferred to Flexo Universal in the spin-off were moved to that facility. On March 1, 2003, Flexo Universal commenced operations at this facility and now conducts balloon production, printing, packaging, warehousing and sales activities there.

On or about April 2003, CTI Mexico ceased production of balloons at its leased facilities. The leases of one facility, consisting of three buildings, and another facility, consisting of one building, have been terminated and CTI Mexico has vacated these locations.

Products

Metalized Balloons. The metalized balloon is composed of a base material (usually nylon or polyester) which is coated on one side with a vacuum deposited aluminum coating and on the other with polyethylene. Typically, the balloon film is printed with graphic designs and messages.

The Company manufactures over 600 balloon designs, in different shapes and sizes, including the following:

4

Latex Balloons. The Company sells a high end line of latex balloons under the product line name Hi-Tex^® and a standard line of latex balloons marketed under the name Partyloons^®. The Company also manufactures toy balloon products including punch balls and water bombs and “Animal Twisties.”

Packaging Films. The Company produces and sells films which are utilized for the packaging of various products, principally food products. The Company laminates, extrusion coats and prints films and sells them to customers who utilize the films for packaging applications. The Company sells these products to companies who, generally, convert the film to bags or pouches for the packaging of food products.

Custom Film Products. The Company fabricates custom film products for various commercial and industrial purposes. These now include “dunnage” bags (inflatable pouches used to cushion products in packages) and flexible containers for the storage of clothing and personal items.

Markets

Metalized Balloons

The metalized balloon came into existence in the late 1970s. During the 1980s, the market for metalized balloons grew rapidly. Initially, the product was sold principally to individual vendors, small retail outlets and at fairs, amusement parks, shopping centers and other outdoor facilities and functions. Metalized balloons remain buoyant when filled with helium for extended periods of time and they permit the printing and display of graphics and messages. As a result, the product has significant appeal as a novelty and message item. Metalized balloons became part of the “social expression” industry, carrying graphics designs, characters and messages like greeting cards. In the mid-1980s, the Company and other participants in the market began licensing character and cartoon images for printing on the balloons and directed marketing of the balloons to retail outlets including grocery, general merchandise, discount and drug store chains, card and gift shops, party goods stores as well as florists and balloon decorators. These outlets now represent the principal means for the sale of metalized balloons throughout the United States and in a number of other countries.

Metalized balloons are sold in the United States and in Europe, several countries in the Far East, Canada and to an increasing extent in Latin America. The United States, however, is by far the largest market for these products.

Metalized balloons are sold in the United States and foreign countries directly by producers to retail outlets and through distributors and wholesalers. Often the sale of metalized balloons by

5

the wholesalers/distributors is accompanied by related products including latex balloons, floral supplies, candy containers, mugs, plush toys, baskets and a variety of party goods. Although the latex balloon market overlaps the metalized balloon market, the latex balloon market has been in existence for a longer period than metalized balloons and extends to more customers and market categories than metalized balloons.

Latex Balloons

There are several latex balloon product lines: (i) high quality decorator balloons, (ii) standard novelty balloons; (iii) printed balloons and (iv) toy categories. The high quality decorator balloons are generally sold to and through balloon decorators and floral outlets and are generally of higher quality and price than the standard line of balloons. The standard line of balloons is sold widely in retail stores including many of the same outlets as metalized balloons.

Printed latex balloons are sold both in retail outlets and for balloon decoration purposes including floral designs. “Toy” balloons include novelty balloons sold in toy departments or stores, punch balls, water bombs and other specialty designs.

Latex balloons are sold through many of the same outlets as metalized balloons including grocery, general merchandise and drug store chains, card and gift shops, party goods stores, florists and balloon decorators. Latex balloons are sold in retail stores in packaged form as well as inflated. Also, certain latex items are sold in retail stores, generally in packaged form, as toy items.

Printed and Specialty Films

The industry and market for printed and specialty films is fragmented and includes many participants. There are hundreds of manufacturers of printed and specialty film products in the United States and in other markets. In many cases, companies who provide food and other products in film packages also produce or process the films used for their packages. The market for the Company’s film products, and for its completed containers, consists principally of companies who utilize the films for the packaging of their products, including food products and other items. In addition to the packaging of food products, the flexible containers are used for medical purposes (such as colostomy bags, containers for saline solution and other items), “dunnage” (to cushion products being packaged), storage of personal and household items and other purposes.

The total volume of products manufactured and sold in this industry is estimated to be well in excess of $3 billion.

Marketing, Sales and Distribution

The Company markets and sells its metalized balloon, latex balloon and related novelty products throughout the United States and in a number of other countries. The Company maintains a marketing, sales staff and support staff of 16 individuals and a customer service department of 5 individuals. European sales are conducted by CTI Balloons, the Company’s subsidiary located in

6

Rugby, England.  Flexo Universal conducts sales and marketing activities for the sale of balloon products in Mexico, Latin America, and certain other markets. Sales in other foreign countries are made generally to distributors in those countries and are managed at the Company’s principal offices.

The Company sells and distributes its balloon products (i) by its employed staffs of sales and customer service personnel in the United States, Mexico and the UK, (ii) through a network of several hundred distributors and wholesalers in the United States, Mexico and the UK, (iii) through several groups of independent sales representatives and (iv) to selected retail chains. The distributors and wholesalers are generally engaged principally in the sale of balloons and related products (including such items as plush toys, mugs, containers, floral supplies and other items) and sell balloons and related products to retail outlets including grocery, general merchandise and drug store chains, card and gift shops, party goods stores as well as florists and balloon decorators.

The Company’s largest customer for balloons during 2004 was Dollar Tree Stores. Sales to this chain in 2004 represented $4,352,000 or approximately 11.7% of net sales.

For a period of three years, the Company did maintain a relationship with Hallmark Cards under which the Company (i) produced balloons of Hallmark designs, and of designs licensed by Hallmark, under authority from Hallmark, (ii) sold such balloons, as well as latex balloons, to Hallmark for resale by Hallmark, and (iii) sold and distributed these balloon designs to customers in the United States. This arrangement and the agreements related to it expired and were terminated on March 31, 2005. The Company continues to sell balloons bearing these designs from its inventory during an 18 month sell-off period. During 2004, the Company’s total sales of metalized and latex balloons to Hallmark were $3,421,000, approximately 9.2% of net sales. The Company does not anticipate significant sales revenue to Hallmark after March 31, 2005.

The Company engages in a variety of advertising and promotional activities to promote the sale of its balloon products. Every two years, the Company produces a complete catalog of its balloon products, and also prepares various flyers and brochures for special or seasonal products, which are disseminated to thousands of customers, potential customers and others. The Company participates in several trade shows for the gift, novelty, balloon and other industries and advertises in several trade and other publications.

The Company markets and sells its printed and laminated films and converted film products directly and through independent sales representatives. The Company sells laminated and printed films to companies that utilize these films to produce packaging for a variety of products, including food products, in both liquid and solid form, such as cola syrup, coffee, juices and other items. The Company markets its custom film products, including its “dunnage” bags (inflatable packaging pouches) and consumer storage bags directly to customers who use the products in their packaging systems or re-sell the products for commercial or consumer applications. During the 2004 fiscal year, the Company sold such products to two principal, and a number of smaller customers. The Company’s largest customer in 2004 for commercial film products was Rapak L.L.C. whose purchases from the Company of film products totaled $7,466,000 for the year, about 20.1% of net sales.

7

During 2004, the Company had total revenues from the sale of film products and storage bags to ITW Spacebag in the amount of $6,266,000, or 16.8% of the Company’s sales. The Company has an agreement with ITW Spacebag expiring in October 2005 under which ITW Spacebag has agreed to purchase 65% of its requirements for film for Spacebags, provided that the Company’s pricing for the film is competitive. The Company is currently involved in discussions with ITW Spacebag to extend this agreement through 2005 and beyond.

Manufacturing

Production and Operations.

The Barrington, Illinois headquarters incorporates the Company’s principal production facilities. The facilities include converting machines which fabricate metalized balloons and packaging bags. These machines have the capacity to manufacture in excess of 50 million 18” balloons annually. The Company produced 30 million balloons in 2004.

The Company owns and operates equipment for the development of films and plates utilized in the printing of films for metalized balloons and packaging films. The Company owns and operates one state of the art high-speed eight color press and two six color presses at its facility in Barrington, Illinois. The Company utilizes a water-based ink process for printing.

The Company owns and operates one extrusion coating and lamination machine and one solventless laminator to produce films for use in metalized balloons, packaging films and specialty film products. The extrusion coating and laminating machine was acquired in 1999 and the laminator was acquired in 2002.

The Company maintains a graphic arts and development department which designs its balloon products and graphics. The Creative Department operates a networked, computerized graphic arts system for the production of these designs and of printed materials including catalogues, advertisements and other promotional materials.

The Barrington facility also includes a computerized customer service department which received and fulfilled over 32,000 orders in our latest fiscal year.

The Company maintains a fulfillment center in Cary, Illinois of approximately 35,000 square feet. At this facility, the Company maintains a finished goods inventory of all balloon products and ships orders throughout the United States and to a number of foreign countries.

Flexo Universal.  Flexo Universal operates a facility in Guadalajara, Mexico which incorporates 43,000 square feet of production, printing, warehouse and office space. At the facility, (i) Flexo Universal produces latex balloons on four machines, (ii) prints latex balloons on two high-speed printing machines and several manually operated machines, (iv) produces formers for latex balloon production, (v) conducts mixing and pigment procedures and (vi) conducts sorting,

8

quality control and balloon packaging activities. At this facility, Flexo Universal also warehouses raw materials and latex and metalized balloon products. Administrative and sales functions are also performed at the facility.

CTI Balloons Ltd.  Through its wholly-owned subsidiary, CTI Balloons Ltd, the Company conducts a warehouse, fulfillment and sales operation in Rugby, United Kingdom for metalized and latex balloons. Sales and fulfillment for all of the United Kingdom, Europe and the Middle East are conducted from this facility.

Raw Materials

The principal raw materials used in manufacturing our products are (i) petroleum-based films, (ii) petroleum-based resin, (iii) latex and (iv) printing inks. At least to some degree, we have historically been able to change our product prices in response to changes in raw materials costs. While we currently purchase our raw materials from a relatively limited number of sources, films, resin and inks are available from numerous sources. Therefore, we believe our current suppliers could be replaced without adversely affecting our manufacturing operations in any material respect.

Competition

The balloon and novelty industry is highly competitive, with numerous competitors. Including the Company, there are presently six principal manufacturers of metalized balloons whose products are sold in the United States including Anagram International, Inc., Pioneer Balloon, Convertidora International, Barton Enterprises and Betallic. Several companies market and sell metalized balloons designed by them and manufactured by others for them. In 1998, Anagram International, Inc. was acquired by Amscan Holdings and in 2000 M&D Balloons was acquired by American Greetings. During 2002, Amscan acquired M&D Balloons from American Greetings.

There are approximately seven manufacturers of latex balloons whose products are sold in the United States.

The market for film packaging and custom products is fragmented, and competition in this area is difficult to gauge. However, there are numerous participants in this market and the Company can expect to experience intense quality and price competition.

Many of these companies offer products and services which are the same or similar to those offered by the Company and the Company’s ability to compete depends on many factors within and outside its control. There are a number of well-established competitors in each of the Company’s product lines, several of which possess substantially greater financial, marketing and technical resources and established, extensive, direct and indirect channels of distribution for their products and services. As a result, such competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new developments and changes in customer requirements, or devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products and services than the Company. Competitive

9

pressures include, among other things, price competition, new designs and product development and copyright licensing.

Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights

In connection principally with its metalized balloon business, the Company has developed or acquired a number of intellectual property rights which are significant to its business.

Copyright Licenses.  The most significant of these rights are licenses on a number of popular characters. The Company presently maintains 8 licenses and produces balloon designs utilizing the characters covered by the licenses. Licenses are generally maintained for a one or two year term, although the Company has maintained long term relationships with several of its licensors and has been able to obtain renewal of its license agreements with them.

Trademarks.  The Company is the owner of 12 registered trademarks in the United States relating to its products. Many of these trademarks are registered in foreign countries, principally in the European Community.

Patent Rights.  The Company is the owner of, or licensee under, several patents which related to both its metalized balloon products and its flexible container products. These include (i) ownership of two patents, and a license under a third, relating to self-sealing valves for metalized balloons and methods of making balloons with such valves, (ii) various metalized balloon design patents, (iii) patents and applications related to the design and structure of, and method of inserting and affixing, zipper-closure systems in a bag and (iv) patents related to one-way valves for pouches.

Research and Development

The Company maintains a product development and research department of 5 individuals for the development or identification of new balloons and related products, product components and sources of supply. Research and development includes (i) creative product development, (ii) creative marketing, and (iii) engineering development. During each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, respectively, the Company estimates that the total amount spent on research and development activities was approximately $246,000, $335,000 and $333,000.

Employees

As of December 31, 2004, the Company had 113 full-time and 2 part-time employees in the United States, of whom 14 are executive or supervisory, 8 are in sales, 67 are in manufacturing and 26 are clerical. As of that same date, the Company had 16 full-time employees in England, of whom 2 are executive or supervisory, 1 is in sales, 7 are in warehousing and 6 are clerical. In Mexico, as of December 31, 2004, the Company had 178 full-time employees, of whom 17 are executive or supervisory, 3 are in sales, 143 are in manufacturing and 15 are clerical. The Company is not a party to any collective bargaining agreement in the United States, has not experienced any work stoppages and believes that its relationship with its employees is satisfactory.

10

Regulatory Matters

The Company’s manufacturing operations are subject to the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSHA”). The Company believes it is in material compliance with OSHA. The Company is subject to similar regulation in Mexico by the Labor Secretary’s office. The Environmental Protection Agency regulates the handling and disposal of hazardous materials. As the Company’s printing operations utilize only water-based ink, the waste generated by the Company’s production process is not deemed hazardous. The Company believes it is in material compliance with applicable environmental rules and regulations. Several states have enacted laws limiting or restricting the release of helium filled metalized balloons. The Company does not believe such legislation will have any material effect on its operations.

International Operations.

The Company sells metalized balloons in a number of foreign countries through distributors situated in those countries. We conduct production, packaging, warehousing and sales operations in Mexico and warehousing and sales operations in the United Kingdom. Our operations in Mexico include the sale of metalized and latex balloons in Mexico and other markets in Latin America. Our operations in the United Kingdom include warehousing and sale of metalized and latex balloons in the United Kingdom and some countries in Europe. We rely and are dependent on our operations in Mexico for the supply of latex balloons in the United States, Mexico, Europe and other markets. Interruption of that supply would have a material adverse effect on the business of the Company.

Reference is made to Note 17 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Part IV hereof for financial information on revenues and assets in our domestic and international operations.

Item No. 2 Properties

The Company owns its principal plant and offices located in Barrington, Illinois, approximately 45 miles northwest of Chicago, Illinois. The facility includes approximately 75,000 square feet of office, manufacturing and warehouse space. This facility is subject to a mortgage loan in the principal amount of $2,832,302, having a term of 5 years, due in May of 2008, with payments amortized over 25 years and bearing interest at the rate of 6.25% per year.

The Company leases a warehouse facility in Cary, Illinois under a one-year lease at the rate of $10,000 per month. The lease expires on September 30, 2005. The facility includes 35,000 square feet of warehouse and office space which is utilized principally for the warehousing of balloon inventory.

The Company also leases approximately 15,000 square feet of office and warehouse space in Rugby, England at an annual lease cost of $51,700, expiring 2019. This facility is utilized for product packaging operations and to manage and service the Company’s operations in England and Europe.

11

In January 2003, Flexo Universal entered into a 5 year lease agreement for the lease of approximately 43,000 square feet of manufacturing, warehouse and office space in Guadalajara, Mexico at the cost of $204,000 per annum.

We believe that our properties have been adequately maintained, are in generally good condition and are suitable for our business as presently conducted. We believe our existing facilities provide sufficient production and storage capacity for our present needs and for our presently anticipated needs in the foreseeable future. We also believe that, with respect to leased properties, upon the expiration of our current leases, we will be able either to secure renewal terms or to enter into leases for alternative locations at market terms.

Item No. 3 Legal Proceedings

On September 5, 2003, Airgas, Inc., Airgas-Southwest, Inc., Airgas-South, Inc. and Airgas-East, Inc. filed a joint action against CTI Industries Corporation for claimed breach of contract in the Circuit Court of Lake County, Illinois claiming as damages the aggregate amount of $162,242. The Company filed an answer denying the material claims of the complaint, affirmative defenses and a counterclaim. In the action, the plaintiffs claimed that CTI Industries Corporation owed them certain sums for (i) helium sold and delivered, (ii) rental charges with respect to helium tanks and (iii) replacement charges for tanks claimed to have been lost. On November 2, 2004, this matter was settled. The amount agreed to be paid by the Company in settlement totaled $100,000. The first payment of $50,000 was paid on November 15, 2004. The balance of $50,000 is payable in five consecutive $10,000 monthly installments, commencing December 30, 2004. This amount was fully accrued as of the settlement date.

On June 4, 2004, Spar Group, Inc. initiated an arbitration proceeding in New York City against the Company. In the proceeding, Spar Group claimed that there was due from the Company to Spar Group a sum for services rendered in the amount of $180,043, plus interest. Spar Group claimed to have rendered services to the Company in various Eckerd stores with respect to the display and ordering of metalized and latex balloons for sale in those stores. The Company filed an answer denying liability with respect to the claim and asserted a counterclaim for damages against Spar Group for breach of its agreement to provide such services. On January 13, 2005, this matter was settled. The amount agreed to be paid by the Company in settlement totaled $100,000. The first payment of $30,000 was paid on February 1, 2005. The balance of $70,000 is payable in seven consecutive $10,000 monthly installments, commencing March 1, 2005. This amount was fully accrued as of December 31, 2004.

In addition, the Company is also party to certain lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. The ultimate outcome of these matters is unknown, but in the opinion of management, we do not believe any of these proceedings will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect upon our financial condition or future results of operation.

12

Item No. 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

At the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders on October 29, 2004, the following actions were submitted and approved by vote of its shareholders:

1.             The election of seven directors; and

2.             The ratification of the Board’s selection of Eisner, LLP as the Company’s independent certified public accountants.

A total of 1,722,365 shares (approximately 88%) of the issued and outstanding voting stock of the Company were represented by proxy or in person at the meeting. These shares were voted on the matters described above as follows:

1.             For the directors as follows:

2.             For the Ratification of Eisner, LLP as the Company’s independent certified public accountants as follows:

Total Broker Non-Votes and
Total Votes Abstaining

There were no other matters voted on at the Company’s October 29, 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, nor was there a submission of any other matter to a vote of securities holders at any time during the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter.

PART II

Item No. 5 Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information. The Company’s Common Stock was admitted to trading on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market under the symbol CTIB on November 5, 1997. Prior to that time, there was no established public trading market for the Company’s Common Stock.

13

The high and low sales prices for the last eight fiscal quarters (retroactively adjusted to reflect post-reverse split share and stock dividend values), according to the NASDAQ Stock Market’s Stock Price History Report, were:

As of March 31, 2005, there were approximately 47 holders of record of the Company’s Common Stock. The Company believes that its total number of actual shareholders is substantially greater than the number of record shareholders.

The Company has never paid any cash dividends on its Common Stock and does not currently intend to pay cash dividends on its Common Stock in the foreseeable future. The Company currently intends to retain all its earnings to finance the development and expansion of its business. Under the terms of its current loan agreement, the Company is restricted from declaring any cash dividends or other distributions on its shares.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

During February 2003, John H. Schwan loaned $930,000 to the Company and Stephen M. Merrick loaned $700,000 to the Company, each in exchange for (i) two year promissory notes bearing interest at 9% per annum and (ii) five year warrants to purchase up to 163,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company at $4.87 per share, the market price of the Common Stock on the date of the Warrants. The proceeds of these loans were to (i) re-finance the bank loan of CTI Mexico in the amount of $880,000 and (ii) to provide financing for CTI Mexico and Flexo Universal. Payment of the principal of the notes has been extended indefinitely by agreement of Mr. Merrick and Mr. Schwan.

On July 1, 2004, the Company entered into a Standby Equity Distribution Agreement (“SEDA”) with Cornell Capital under which Cornell agreed to provide up to $5 million to the Company in connection with the purchase of Common Stock of the Company over a two year term. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company has the option to sell shares of its Common Stock to Cornell at the market price for the stock at the time of the sale. The Company may request advances, representing purchases of its stock, of up to $100,000 in any week, up to a maximum amount of $400,000 in any month, subject to registration of the stock prior to sale. The Company has not, as yet taken action to register shares to be sold under the SEDA and the Board of Directors of the Company is reviewing the arrangement to make a determination as to whether and when to proceed under it. On August 5, 2004, the Company issued 14,162 shares of its Common Stock to

14

Cornell and 3,500 shares of its common stock to Newbridge Securities, Cornell’s stock placement agent for underwriting services as partial consideration under the terms of SEDA.

On September 13, 2004, the Company issued 18,018 shares of its common stock to Thornhill Capital, LLC in return for consulting services. These shares were valued at the then current market value on the date of issue.

Item No. 6 Selected Financial Data

The following selected financial data are derived from the consolidated financial statements of the Company. The data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, related notes, and other financial information included herein.

(In thousands, except per share data)

(1) Short-term obligations consist primarily of borrowings under bank lines of credit and the current portion of long-term debt

15

Item No. 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

The Company produces film products for novelty, packaging and container applications. These products include metalized balloons, latex balloons and related latex toy products, films for packaging applications, and flexible containers for packaging and storage applications. We produce all of our film products for packaging and container applications, and all of our metalized balloons at our facility in Barrington, Illinois. We produce all of our latex balloons and latex products at our facility in Guadalajara, Mexico. Substantially all of our film products for packaging applications and flexible containers for packaging and storage are sold to customers in the United States. We market and sell our novelty items - principally metalized balloons and latex balloons - in the United States, Mexico, the United Kingdom and a number of additional countries.

For the years 2004, 2003 and 2002 our revenues as a percentage of total consolidated sales from each of our principal product categories were as follows:

Over the past several years, revenues from commercial films and containers have increased significantly as a percentage of sales. As a percentage of net sales, revenues in this category have increased from a level of 17% of revenues in 1998 to approximately 48% during 2002 and 2003, reducing to approximately 37% of net Company revenues during 2004. During the period from 1998 through 2003, sales in this product category accounted for most of the increase in consolidated sales during these years. In 2004, sales to ITW Space Bag decreased from $10,298,000 in 2003 to $6,266,000 for 2004. The decline in sales to ITW was attributable to ITW manufacturing certain space bag items for its own account and the fact that the Company did not supply certain components for the bags during 2004. Sales to this customer for 2005 are expected to be at levels similar to, or slightly lower than, for 2004.

Purchases by a limited number of customers represent a significant portion of total Company revenues. In 2004, sales to our top 10 customers represented 69.2% of total revenues. Of those principal customers, one is a customer for packaging film and represented 20.1% of total 2004 revenues, one is a customer for storage containers and represented 16.8% of total 2004 revenues and one is a customer for metalized balloons and represented 11.7% of total 2004 revenues. For the most part, with our principal customers, we do not have long-term purchase agreements or

16

commitments and the risk exists that sales to one or more of these customers will decline or terminate. With one customer for packaging film, however, we do have a contract extending through October 2005, under which the customer is obligated to purchase at least 65% of that customer’s requirements for the packaging film and with our customer for storage containers, we do have an agreement extending through July 2005 under which that customer has agreed, subject to certain conditions, to purchase its requirements for the film used in the storage bags. Loss of one or more of these principal customers, or a significant reduction in purchases by one or more of them, could have a material adverse effect on the business of the Company.

We have experienced declines in our gross margins over the past several years. In general, gross margins have declined from almost 28% in 2001 to 17% in 2004. Most of this decline in gross margins relates to metalized balloons. Margins in that product category have declined from 27% in 2001 to 13% in 2004. The decline in margin is attributable both to price competition and to increases in the costs principally of factory overhead and direct labor, and, to a limited degree, in 2004, of raw materials. We experienced significant increases in factory overhead costs during 2002 and 2003; cost increases included insurance costs, health insurance costs, supervisory wages, quality control wages and depreciation. During 2004, we engaged in ongoing efforts to achieve reduction in factory overhead costs. In the year, reductions in overhead costs were achieved, most significantly by a 35% decrease in indirect labor, a 68% decrease in business insurance costs and a 51% decrease in repair and maintenance expenses. In the fourth quarter of 2004, our factory overhead in the U.S. was 32% less than in the first quarter. We intend to continue these efforts and believe that we will achieve additional reductions in factory overhead and direct labor costs during 2005.

Our business plan includes:

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2003

Net Sales. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, consolidated revenues from the sale of all products were $37,193,000, compared to consolidated revenues of $36,260,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003, a increase of 2.6%. Revenue changes in our principal product categories included: (i) a 20.7% decrease in sales of printed and laminated films from

17

$17,439,000 in 2003 to $13,823,000 in 2004, (ii) a 31.6% increase in sales of metalized balloons from $12,405,000 in 2003 to $16,320,000 in 2004 and (iii) a 27.4% increase in the sales of latex balloons from $4,125,000 in 2003 to $5,255,000 in 2004. These changes in revenues included a decrease in sales to two principal customers. Sales in 2003 to these two customers were as follows: (i) $10,298,000 to ITW Spacebag for film and consumer storage bags, (ii) $4,006,000 to Hallmark Cards, principally for metalized balloons. During 2004, sales to each of those customers, respectively, were: (i) $6,266,000 and (ii) $3,421,000. These decreases were offset by an increase in sales to Rapak, LLC, a principal customer of packaging film and to a new customer of foil balloons. During 2003, sales to Rapak were $5,360,000. During 2004, sales to each of those customers, respectively, were $7,466,000 and $4,352,000.

For the fiscal year 2004, on a consolidated basis, metalized balloons represented 43.9% of sales, laminated and printed films 37.2% of sales and latex balloons 14.1% of sales. During fiscal 2003, metalized balloons represented 34.2% of sales, laminated and printed films 48.1% of sales and latex balloons 11.4% of sales. The Company anticipates that in 2005, the mix of products will change in so far as the percentage of metalized ballons will decrease, laminated and printed films will be consistent and latex balloon sales should increase.

Cost of Sales.  For fiscal 2004, cost of sales increased to 82.9% of net sales compared to 81.7% of net sales for fiscal 2003. In 2004, the product mix changed from selling a majority of laminate and printed film to a majority of metalized balloons which historically have lower margins. In fiscal 2004, profit margins on metalized balloons, latex balloons and laminated and printed film were 13.0%, 10.1% and 25.3%, respectively, compared to margins on the same product lines for 2003 of 10.4%, 9.1% and 34.9%. The decrease in the margins of the laminated and printed film was a result of the difference in the product mix and a reduction of the prices charged for consumer storage bags. Cost of sales were higher, as a percentage of net sales in the fourth quarter of 2004 than in prior quarters of 2004 and the fourth quarter of 2003, resulting in lower gross profit than in those prior quarters by reason of the facts that: (i) sales of storage bags continued to decline resulting in a shift in product mix to lower margin products, (ii) higher costs of production in prior quarters resulted in higher unit costs for metalized balloons sold during the fourth quarter and (iii) there were discounted and low margin sales of balloon products in the fourth quarter. Management anticipates improvement in margins for balloon products during 2005 as reduced production overhead expenses are reflected in lower unit costs.

General and Administrative.  For fiscal 2004, administrative expenses were $4,411,000 or 11.9% of net sales, as compared to $4,055,000 or 11.2% of net sales for fiscal 2003. The increase in general and administrative expenses is attributable to an increase in bad debt reserves and personnel costs. The Company expects that in 2005 there will be an increase in these expenses involving personnel costs.

Selling.  For fiscal 2004, selling expenses were $1,495,000 or 4.0% of net sales compared to $1,442,000, or 4.0% of net sales for fiscal 2003. There was no significant change in selling expenses from 2003 to 2004. The Company expects an increase in selling expenses in 2005.

Marketing and Advertising.  For fiscal 2004, advertising and marketing expenses were $1,014,000 or 2.7% of net sales, compared to $1,816,000 or 5% of net sales for fiscal 2003. The decrease is attributable principally to a reduction in personnel cost, a reduction in catalog expense, and decrease in artwork and films expenses. The Company expects a small decrease in these expenses in 2005.

Other Income (Expense).  For fiscal 2004, interest expense and loan fees totaled $1,350,000 or 3.6% of sales. For fiscal 2003, interest expense and loan fees totaled $1,103,000 or 3.0% of sales. The increase in interest expense is attributable principally to increased levels of borrowing and an increased average rate of interest on outstanding indebtedness. The Company had currency

18

exchange gains during 2004 of $208,000 compared to currency exchange losses during fiscal 2003 of $36,000. The Company had other income during 2004 of $395,000. Items of other income included (i) gains related to a review and determination that various accrued items on the books of the Mexican subsidiaries of the Company (CTI Mexico and Flexo) are not due or payable; these items included: (a) accrued amounts for profit sharing or seniority benefits determined on the basis of legal review not to be due, totaling $98,000, (b) accrued amounts related to an asset tax determined not to be due or beyond the statute of limitations, in the amount approximately of $49,000, (c) accrued amounts with respect to various accounts settled or determined not to be due or payable, in the aggregate amount of $190,000 and (ii) gains totaling $70,000 based on the settlement of various accounts in consideration of the payment of an amount less than the amount accrued. These items were offset by $12,000 in other expenses. Most of these gains are attributable to the first quarter of 2004 and relate to the restructuring of CTI Mexico which commenced in February 2003 when CTI Mexico effected a spin-off under Mexican law in which a portion of the assets, liabilities and capital of that company were transferred to Flexo Universal and Flexo Universal became the primary subsidiary of the Company in Mexico. These other gains are not recurring.

The Company had other income during 2003 of $428,000 arising principally from the forgiveness of certain indebtedness.

Net Income or Loss.  For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, the Company had a loss before taxes and minority interest of $1,192,000 compared to a loss before taxes and minority interest for fiscal 2003 of $1,349,000. The net loss for fiscal 2004 was $2,479,000 compared to net loss for fiscal 2003 of $566,000.

Income Taxes.  For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, the Company had an income tax expense of $1,286,000 compared to an income tax benefit of $782,000 for fiscal 2003. The amount of the income tax expense or benefit recognized by the Company for both 2004 and 2003 reflects adjustments in deferred tax assets and other items arising from the operating results of the Company for each year. This increase, which was recorded during the fourth quarter, was made after management determined, based on fourth quarter activity, that the realization of the deferred tax asset was not likely in the foreseeable future. Fourth quarter activity affecting this determination included lower than anticipated sales in the storage bag product line and lower margin sales of novelty products.

Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002

Net Sales.  For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, consolidated revenues from the sale of all products were $36,260,000, compared to consolidated revenues of $41,236,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of 12%. This decrease in revenues is the result principally of (i) an 11% decrease in sales of printed and laminated films from $19,621,000 in 2002 to $17,439,000 in 2003, (ii) a 24% decrease in sales of metalized balloons from $16,392,000 in 2002 to $12,405,000 in 2003 and (iii) a 17% decrease in the sales of latex balloons from $4,948,000 in 2002 to $4,125,000 in 2003. These revenue decreases are attributable principally to decreases in sales to three principal customers. Sales in 2002 to these three customers were as follows: (i) $12,086,000 to a customer for consumer storage bags, (ii) $7,000,000 to a customer for packaging films and (iii) $5,111,000, to a customer for metalized balloons. During 2003, sales to each of those customers, respectively, were: (i) $10,298,000, (ii) $5,360,000 and (iii) $4,006,000.

19

For the fiscal year 2003, on a consolidated basis, metalized balloons represented 34% of sales, laminated and printed films 48% of sales and latex balloons 11% of sales. During fiscal 2002, metalized balloons represented 40% of sales, laminated and printed films 48% of sales and latex balloons 12% of sales.

Cost of Sales.  For fiscal 2003, cost of sales increased to 81.7% of net sales compared to 78.4% of net sales for fiscal 2002. In fiscal 2003, profit margins on metalized balloons, latex balloons and laminated and printed film were 10.4%, 9.1% and 34.9%, respectively, compared to margins on the same product lines for 2002 of 24.3%, 17.5% and 27.5%. The reduction in margins with respect to metalized balloons in 2003 is attributable principally to pricing affected by price competition and to increases in production overhead.

General and Administrative.  For fiscal 2003, administrative expenses were $4,055,000, or 11.2% of net sales, as compared to $4,225,000 or 10.2% of net sales for fiscal 2002. The decrease in administrative expenses is attributable to decreases in personnel and compensation expense, audit expenses, legal expenses and consulting fees.

Selling.  For fiscal 2003, selling expenses were $1,442,000 or 4% of net sales compared to $1,551,000, or 3.8% of net sales for fiscal 2002. There was no significant change in selling expenses from 2002 to 2003.

Marketing and Advertising.  For fiscal 2003, advertising and marketing expenses were $1,816,000 or 5% of net sales, compared to $1,671,000 or 4.1% of sales for fiscal 2002. The increase is attributable principally to increases in artwork and films and trade show expense.

Other Expense.  For fiscal 2003, interest expense and loan fees totaled $1,103,000. For fiscal 2002, interest expense was $832,000. The increase in interest expense is attributable principally to increased levels of borrowing and an increased average rate of interest on outstanding indebtedness. The Company had currency exchange losses during 2003 of $36,000 compared to currency exchange losses during fiscal 2002 of $281,000. The Company had other income during 2003 of $428,000 arising principally from the forgiveness of certain indebtedness; the Company had no such income during 2002.

Net Income or Loss.  For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, the Company had a loss before taxes and minority interest of $1,349,000 compared to income before taxes and minority interest for fiscal 2002 of $335,000. The net loss for fiscal 2003 was $566,000 compared to net income for fiscal 2002 of $303,000.

Income Taxes.  For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, the Company had an income tax benefit of $782,000 compared to an income tax expense of $39,000 for fiscal 2002. The amount of the income tax expense or benefit recognized by the Company for both 2003 and 2002 reflects adjustments in deferred tax assets and other items arising from the operating results of the Company for each year.

20

Financial Condition

Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2003

Cash Flow From Operations.  Cash flow used in operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 was $571,000. Cash flow used in operations resulted principally from an increase in accounts receivable of $1,791,000 and a decrease in the deferred income tax asset of $1,189,000, a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $847,000, offset by depreciation and amortization of $1,651,000, and a reduction in inventory and other assets totaling $1,281,000. The increase in accounts receivable was attributable principally to the existence of a receivable from one customer in the amount of $1,439,000 as of December 31, 2004, all of which has subsequently been paid. Cash flow generated by operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 was $3,208,000.

Cash Used in Investing Activities.  During fiscal 2004, the Company invested the net amount of $273,000 in machinery and equipment. During fiscal 2003, the Company invested $2,007,000 in machinery and equipment. In the absence of additional financing being received by the Company during 2005, the Company does not anticipate capital expenditures during 2005 in excess of $500,000. However, the Company may seek, and may receive, additional financing intended in part for investment in capital items.

Cash From Financing Activities.  Cash provided by financing activities during fiscal 2004 was $883,000. The principal financing activities of the Company during 2004 included (i) an increase of cash due to an increase in the revolving line of credit of $2,707,000 and (ii) a reduction in cash resulting from the net repayment of long-term debt of $2,513,000. During fiscal 2003, cash flow used in financing activities was $804,000.

On December 31, 2003, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with a bank under which the lender has provided the Company with a credit facility in the amount of $11,000,000, collateralized by machinery and equipment, inventories, trade receivables and other assets of the Company. The credit facility includes a term loan of $3,500,000, at an interest rate of prime plus 1.5% per annum (6.75% at December 31, 2004), which is based upon the appraised value of the machinery and equipment of the Company, and a revolving line of credit, up to a maximum amount of $7,500,000 at an interest rate of prime plus 1.5% per annum. Advances under the revolving line of credit include advances of up to 85% of eligible trade receivables and up to 50% of the value of the Company’s eligible inventories. The term loan and revolving line of credit are secured by substantially all assets of the Company. In connection with the Loan Agreement, two principals of the Company executed agreements pursuant to which they agreed, in the event appraisal (liquidation value) of the Company’s machinery and equipment to be performed during 2004 indicated values less than those specified in the Loan Agreement, to provide guarantees of a portion of the term loan or subordinated loan funds to the Company. During 2004, these two principals pledged certain of their individual assets as security for the amount by which the principal balance of the term loan exceeded the most recent appraised (liquidation) value of the Company’s machinery and equipment. The term of this credit facility is for a period of 2 years expiring on December 31, 2005, and is automatically extended after that date from year to year unless (i) the bank accelerates the payment of the obligations under the Loan Agreement or

21

(ii) either party elects to terminate by giving notice of termination 90 days before the expiration of the original or any renewal term.

Certain terms of the Loan Agreement include: (i) the requirement that the Company maintain a specified level of tangible net worth and a ratio of EBITDA to fixed charges, (ii) mandatory prepayment of the term loan (A) from the proceeds of the sale or disposition of equipment and (B) 50% of excess cash flow of the Company during 2004 and (iii) a prohibition of various acts including (A) incurring new debt, (B) engaging in acquisitions, (C) paying dividends, (D) purchasing stock, without the consent of the Bank.

As of December 31, 2004, the Company was not in compliance with the financial covenant of this loan requiring that the Company maintain a specified relationship of EBITDA to fixed charges. The Bank has issued a waiver of this non-compliance and has agreed to an amendment modifying the covenants. Based on our financial projections, the Company will be in compliance with the covenants for the first quarter of 2005 and, we believe, will remain in compliance for all of 2005.

Approximately $6,763,000 in proceeds from this new loan were used to pay to a prior senior lender the entire balance due to that lender consisting of $2,540,000 in term loans and $4,223,000 in revolving loans.

In January 2001, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with an institutional lender under which the lender provided the Company with a credit facility in the amount of $9,500,000, collateralized by machinery and equipment, inventories, trade receivables and other assets of the Company. The credit facility included a term loan of $1,426,000, at an interest rate of prime plus 0.75% per annum, which was based upon the appraised value of the machinery and equipment of the Company and a revolving line of credit at an interest rate of prime plus 0.5% per annum, the amount of which was based on advances of up to 85% of eligible trade receivables and up to 40% of the value of the Company’s inventories. In 2002, the lender advanced additional funds on the original term loan in the amount of $490,880 and advanced a second term loan in the amount of $1,740,000 and increased the credit facility to $11,500,000. The term loans and revolving line of credit were secured by substantially all assets of the Company. The term of this credit facility was for a period of three years expiring on January 15, 2004. On December 31, 2003, the entire balance due to the lender was paid and the credit facility with that lender terminated.

In January 2001, another bank loaned to the Company the sum of $2,873,000 in a refinance of the Company’s principal office building and property situated in Barrington, Illinois. This mortgage loan is secured by this building and property, and has been made in the form of two notes: one note is in the principal amount of $2,700,000, bears interest of 9.75% per annum, and has a term of five years with a 25 year amortization, and the second note is in the principal amount of $173,000, bears interest at 10% per annum, and has a term of three years. In May 2003, this loan was amended to increase the principal amount of the first note to $2,912,000 and to reduce the interest rate to 6.25% per annum. The second note was paid in full as of January 5, 2004.

During 2004, John H. Schwan and Stephen M. Merrick loaned to Flexo Universal the net amount of $86,000 and $181,000, respectively. These loans are evidenced by promissory notes and the

22

agreement of Flexo Universal to secure such notes with the receivables and equipment of Flexo Universal. The notes bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum.

Current assets.  As of December 31, 2004, the total current assets of the Company were $15,645,000 compared to total current assets of $15,435,000 as of December 31, 2003. The change in current assets reflects, principally, increase in receivables of $1,503,000 partially offset by a decrease in inventory of $915,000 and a decrease in the deferred tax asset of $362,000.

Inventories. The net inventory of the Company decrease from $9,263,000 as of December 31, 2003 to $8,348,000 as of December 31, 2004. The decrease reflected principally a decrease in metalized balloon inventory.

Property, Plant and Equipment. During fiscal 2004, the Company invested $306,000 in capital items. Most of this investment was in production equipment. During 2003, the Company invested $2,007,000 in capital items.

Current liabilities.  Total current liabilities increased from $16,140,000 as of December 31, 2003 to $18,435,000 as of December 31, 2004. This increase is attributable principally to an increase in the line of credit from $3,694,000 as of December 31, 2003 to $6,401,000 as of December 31, 2004, which occurred principally by reason of the new line of credit agreement. This was offset by (i) a decrease of accounts payable from $6,799,000 as of December 31, 2003 to $6,148,000 as of December 31, 2004 and (ii) a decrease in accrued liabilities from $2,307,000 as of December 31, 2003 to $1,812,000 as of December 31, 2004.

Liquidity and Capital Resources. Management’s plans to improve profitability during 2005 include relocating certain manufacturing operations from the United States to its foreign affiliates and continued cost reductions in the area of direct and overhead expenses in the U.S. operations. In addition, the Company is currently evaluating its operating strategies to expand its storage bag product line, which the Company anticipates will improve its overall profit margin. The Company belives it has sufficient cash and funding opportunities to meet its operating requirements through January 1, 2006.

23

Contractual Commitments. The contractual commitments of the Company over the next five years are as follows:

The Company does not have any current material commitments for capital expenditures.

24

Seasonality

In the metalized product line, sales have historically been seasonal with approximately 20% to 30% of annual sales of metalized balloons being generated in December and January, and 11% to 13% of annual metalized balloon sales being generated in June and July in recent years. The sale of latex balloons and laminated film products have not historically been seasonal, and as sales in these products lines increase as a percentage of total sales, the seasonality of the Company’s total net sales has decreased.

Critical Accounting Policies

The financial statements of the Company are based on the selection and application of significant accounting policies which require management to make various estimates and assumptions. The following are some of the more critical judgment areas in the application of our accounting policies that currently affect our financial condition and results of operation.

Revenue Recognition.  Substantially all of the Company’s revenues are derived from the sale of products. With respect to the sale of products, revenue from a transaction is recognized when (i) a definitive arrangement exists for the sale of the product, (ii) delivery of the product has occurred, (iii) the price to the buyer has been fixed or is determinable and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured. The Company recognizes revenue for the sale of products when the products have been delivered and legal title and all risks of ownership have been transferred to the customer. In some cases, product is provided on consignment to customers. In those cases, revenue is recognized when the customer reports a sale of the product.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.  We estimate our allowance for doubtful accounts based on an analysis of specific accounts, an analysis of historical trends, payment and write-off histories. Our credit risks are continually reviewed and management believes that adequate provisions have been made for doubtful accounts. However, unexpected changes in the financial condition of customers or changes in the state of the economy could result in write-offs which exceed estimates and negatively impact our financial results. As of December 31, 2004, we had total reserves for potential bad debts of $404,000. This reserve includes $237,000 of general reserve against outstanding receivables and $167,000 of reserve against a receivable from a distributor. Our general reserve is consistent with our bad debt experience. We provided extended payment terms to a distributor whose business is important to our efforts in certain markets and with this distribution whom we have a long-standing relationship. We monitor the financial condition of the distributor closely and, during 2004, received payments from the distributor of $164,000. Total sales to this distributor in 2004 were $134,381.

Inventory Valuation.  Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using standard costs which approximate costing determined on a first-in, first out basis. Standard costs are reviewed and adjusted periodically based on actual direct and indirect production costs. Labor, overhead and purchase price variances from standard costs are determined on a monthly basis and inventory is adjusted monthly reflecting these variances. On a periodic basis, the Company reviews its inventory levels for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable items, in reference to future demand requirements and shelf life of the products.

25

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets.  We evaluate whether events or circumstances have occurred which indicate that the carrying amounts of long-lived assets (principally property and equipment and goodwill) may be impaired or not recoverable. Significant factors which may trigger an impairment review include: changes in business strategy, market conditions, the manner of use of an asset, underperformance relative to historical or expected future operating results, and negative industry or economic trends. In 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” which among other things, eliminates the amortization of goodwill and certain other intangible assets and requires that goodwill be evaluated annually for impairment by applying a fair-value based test. We retained valuation consulting firms to conduct an evaluation of our goodwill in our Mexico subsidiary in June 2002, December 2002, December 2003 and December 2004. Based upon these evaluations, the Company believes our goodwill valuation of our Mexico subsidiary on these dates, in the amount of $1,113,000 was not impaired.

Income Taxes and Deferred Tax Assets.   The Company recognizes the amount of income taxes currently payable and deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities, and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years these temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are reduced by valuation allowance when in the opinion of management it is more likely than not some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

The Company is subject to U.S. Federal, state and local taxes as well as foreign taxes in the United Kingdom and Mexico. Foreign currency translation adjustments exclude income tax expense (benefit) given that the Company’s investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries are deemed to be reinvested for an indefinite period of time.

As of December 31, 2004, the Company had a net deferred tax asset of $152,000, representing the amount the Company may recover in future years from future taxable income. As of December 31, 2003, the amount of the deferred tax asset was $1,341,000. Each year and period management must make a judgment to determine the extent to which the deferred tax asset will be recovered from future taxable income. As of December 31, 2004, management has determined that an appropriate allowance against the deferred tax asset, because it is more likely than not that such amount will not be realized, is $2,454,000. As of December 31, 2003, the amount of this reserve was $739,000. These determinations involve the exercise of significant management judgment and are made based upon historical, current and projected levels of revenue and profit.

Foreign Currency Translation. All balance sheet accounts of foreign subsidiaries have been translated using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Statements of operations amounts have been translated using the average exchange rate for the year. The gains and losses resulting from the changes in exchange rates

26

from year to year have been reported in other comprehensive loss. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recognized in the period incurred and are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS Statement 123R”), which replaces SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supercedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” This statement requires that all share-based payments to employees be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values on the date of grant. The Company currently uses the intrinsic value method to measure compensation expense for stock-based awards. The Stock Based Compensation caption within Note 3 provides a pro forma net income (loss) and earnings per share as if the Company had used a fair-value based method provided by SFAS l23R to measure stock-based compensation for 2004, 2003 and 2002. SFAS No. 123R is effective as of the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after December 31, 2005 and applies to all awards granted, modified, repurchased or cancelled after the effective date. The Company is evaluating the requirements of SFAS 123R and expects that its adoption will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and earnings per share.

In November of 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs,” which amends the guidance in APB No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material (spoilage). This statement requires that those items be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of “so abnormal” as stated in ARB No. 43. Additionally, SFAS 151 requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The Company is required to adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 151 in the first quarter of 2006. The Company does not expect SFAS 151 to have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

In December of 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets – An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29” (SFAS 153). SFAS 153 eliminates the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. SFAS 153 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 and is required to be adopted by the Company in the first quarter of 2006. The Company does not believe that the adoption of SFAS 153 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (FIN No. 46) was originally issued in January 2003 and was subsequently revised in December 2003. FIN No. 46 attempts to clarify the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 “Consolidated Financial Statements,” to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. The Company does not believe that it has any involvement with variable interest entities that are required to be consolidated under FIN No. 46.

Legal proceedings

In the ordinary course of business, we are subject to various legal proceedings, including lawsuits and other claims related to labor, product and other matters. We are required to assess the likelihood of adverse judgments and outcomes to these matters as well as the range of potential loss. Such assessments are required to determine whether a loss contingency reserve is required under the provisions of SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, and to determine the amount of required reserves, if any. These assessments are subjective in nature. Management makes these assessments for each individual matter based on consultation with outside counsel and based on prior experience with similar claims. To the extent additional information becomes available or our strategies or assessments change, our estimates of potential liability for a given matter may change. Changes to estimates of liability would result in a corresponding additional charge or benefit recognized in the statement of operations in the period in which such changes become known. We recognize the costs associated with legal defense in the periods incurred. Accordingly, the future costs of defending claims are not included in our estimated liability.

Safe Harbor Provision of the Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995 and Forward Looking Statements

The Company operates in a dynamic and rapidly changing environment that involves numerous risks and uncertainties. The market for mylar and latex balloon products is generally characterized by intense competition, frequent new product introductions and changes in customer tastes which can render existing products unmarketable. The statements contained in Item 1 (Description of Business) and Item 7 (Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations) that are not historical facts may be forward-looking statements (as such term is defined in the rules promulgated pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties more fully described in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission including, without limitation, those described under “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Form SB-2 Registration Statement (File No. 333-31969) effective November 5, 1997. The forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs of the Company’s management, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to the Company’s management. Accordingly, these statements are subject to significant risks, uncertainties and contingencies which could cause the Company’s actual growth, results, performance and business prospects and opportunities in 2004 and beyond to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any such forward-looking statements. Wherever possible, words such as “anticipate,” “plan,” “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” and similar expressions have been used to identify these forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. These risks, uncertainties and contingencies include, but are not limited, to competition from, among others, national and regional balloon, packaging and custom film product manufacturers and sellers that have greater financial, technical and marketing resources and distribution capabilities than the Company, the availability of sufficient capital, the maturation and success of the Company’s strategy to

27

develop, market and sell its products, risks inherent in conducting international business, risks associated with securing licenses, changes in the Company’s product mix and pricing, the effectiveness of the Company’s efforts to control operating expenses, general economic and business conditions affecting the Company and its customers in the United States and other countries in which the Company sells and anticipates selling its products and services and the Company’s ability to (i) adjust to changes in technology, customer preferences, enhanced competition and new competitors; (ii) protect its intellectual property rights from infringement or misappropriation; (iii) maintain or enhance its relationships with other businesses and vendors; and (iv) attract and retain key employees. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to identify, develop, market, sell or support new products successfully, that any such new products will gain market acceptance, or that the Company will be able to respond effectively to changes in customer preferences. There can be no assurance that the Company will not encounter technical or other difficulties that could delay introduction of new or updated products in the future. If the Company is unable to introduce new products and respond to industry changes or customer preferences on a timely basis, its business could be materially adversely affected. The Company is not obligated to update or revise these forward-looking statements to reflect new events or circumstances.

Item No. 7A - Qualitative And Quantitative Disclosures Regarding Market Risk

The Company is exposed to various market risks, primarily foreign currency risks and interest rate risks.

The Company’s earnings are affected by changes in interest rates as a result of variable rate indebtedness. If market interest rates for our variable rate indebtedness averaged 1% more than the interest rate actually paid for the years ending December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, our interest rate expense would have increased, and income after income taxes would have decreased by $56,000, $39,000 and $49,000, for these years, respectively. These amounts are determined by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rates on our borrowings. This analysis does not consider the effects of the reduced level of overall economic activity that could exist in such an environment. Further, in the event of a change of such magnitude, management would likely take actions to reduce our exposure to such change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions we would take and their possible effects, the sensitivity analysis assumes no change in our financial structure.

The Company’s earnings and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency rates, particularly the Mexican peso and the British pound, as the Company produces and sells products in Mexico for sale in the United States and other countries and the Company’s U.K. subsidiary purchases balloon products from the Company in dollars. Also, the Mexican subsidiary purchases goods from external sources in U.S. dollars and is affected by currency fluctuations in those transactions. Substantially all of the Company’s purchases and sales of goods for its operations in the United States are done in U.S. dollars. However, the Company’s level of sales in other countries may be affected by currency fluctuations. As a result, exchange rate fluctuations may have an effect on sales and gross margins. Accounting practices require that the Company’s results from operations be converted to U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. Consequently, the reported earnings of the Company in future periods may be affected by

28

fluctuations in currency exchange rates, generally increasing with a weaker U.S. dollar and decreasing with a strengthening U.S. dollar. To date, we have not entered into any transactions to hedge against currency fluctuation effects.

We have performed a sensitivity analysis as of December 31, 2004 that measures the change in the results of our foreign operations arising from a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in the exchange rate of all of the currencies the Company presently has operations in. Using the results of operations for 2004, 2003 and 2002 for the Company’s foreign operations as a basis for comparison, an adverse movement of 10% would create a potential reduction in the Company’s net income, or increase its net loss, before taxes, in the amount of, for each of those years, $177,000, $173,000 and $176,00, respectively.

The Company is also exposed to market risk in changes in commodity prices in some of the raw materials it purchases for its manufacturing needs. However, this presents a risk that would not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

Item No. 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Reference is made to the Consolidated Financial Statements attached hereto.

Item No. 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Effective February 10, 2005, the Company engaged Weiser, LLP as the Company’s principal accountants to audit the Company’s financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2004. Weiser, LLP replaced Eisner, LLP, which had previously been engaged for the same purpose, and whose dismissal was effective February 10, 2005. The decision to change the Company’s principal accountants was approved by the Company’s Audit Committee on February 10, 2005.

The reports of Eisner, LLP, on the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as amended, did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

Previously, effective July 24, 2003, the Company dismissed McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, which had been engaged as the Company’s principal accountants to audit the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002. The reports of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP on the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

During the Company’s last two fiscal years ended December 31, 2002, and December 31, 2003, and in the subsequent interim periods through April 27, 2005, there were no disagreements with McGladrey & Pullen, LLP or Eisner, LLP, respectively, on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP or Eisner, LLP,

29

would have caused either to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with their respective reports on the financial statements for such periods.

Neither McGladrey & Pullen, LLP nor Eisner, LLP have informed the Company of any reportable events during the Company’s last two fiscal years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively, and in subsequent interim periods through April 27, 2005.

Item No. 9A - Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by of this report, have concluded that, as of such date our disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company would be made known to them by others within the Company.

(b) Changes in internal controls. There were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures subsequent to the date of their evaluation, nor were there any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the Company’s internal controls. As a result, no corrective actions were required or undertaken.

Item No. 9B - Other Information

Not Applicable.

PART III

Item No. 10 Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

Directors and Executive Officers

The Company’s current directors and executive officers and their ages, as of April 15, 2005, are as follows:

30

All directors hold office until the next annual meeting following their election and/or until their successors are elected and qualified. Officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board. Information with respect to the business expenses and affiliation of the directors and the executive officers of the Company is set forth below:

John H. Schwan, Chairman. Mr. Schwan has been an officer and director of the Company since January 1996. Mr. Schwan has been the President and principal executive officer of Packaging Systems and affiliated companies for over the last 15 years. Mr. Schwan has over 20 years of general management experience, including manufacturing, marketing and sales. Mr. Schwan served in the U.S. Army Infantry in Vietnam from 1966 to 1969, where he attained the rank of First Lieutenant.

Howard W. Schwan, President. Mr. Schwan has been associated with the Company for 21 years, principally in the management of the production and engineering operations of the Company. Mr. Schwan was appointed as Vice President of Manufacturing in November 1990, was appointed as a director in January 1996, and was appointed as President in June 1997.

Stephen M. Merrick, Executive Vice President and Secretary. Mr. Merrick was President of the Company from January 1996 to June 1997 when he became Chief Executive Officer of the Company. In October 1999, Mr. Merrick became Executive Vice President. Mr. Merrick is a principal of the law firm of Merrick & Associates, P.C. of Chicago, Illinois and has been engaged in the practice of law for more than 35 years. Mr. Merrick is also Senior Vice President, Director and a member of the Management Committee of Reliv International, Inc. (NASDAQ), a manufacturer and direct marketer of nutritional supplements and food products.

Mark Van Dyke, Senior Vice President. Mr. Van Dyke rejoined the Company in August 2001. Mr. Van Dyke has over 25 years experience in the balloon industry and was previously employed by the Company for 12 years. Prior to rejoining the Company, Mr. Van Dyke was employed by M&D Balloons, Inc. for eight years and became Executive Director of that Company.

Brent Anderson, Vice President of Manufacturing. Mr. Anderson has been employed by the Company since January 1989, and has held a number of engineering positions with the Company including Plant Engineer and Plant Manager. In such capacities, Mr. Anderson was responsible for the design and manufacture of much of the Company’s manufacturing equipment. Mr. Anderson was appointed Vice President of Manufacturing in June 1997.

Samuel Komar, Vice President of Sales. Mr. Komar has been employed by the Company since March of 1998, and was named Vice-President of Sales in September of 2001. Mr. Komar has worked in sales for 16 years, and prior to his employment with the Company, Mr. Komar was with Bob Gable & Associates, a manufacturer of sporting goods. Mr. Komar received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Sales and Marketing from Indiana University.

Timothy Patterson, Vice President of Finance and Administration. Mr. Patterson has been employed by the Company as Vice President of Finance and Administration since September,

31

2003. Prior to his employment with the Company, Mr. Patterson was Manager of Controllers for the Thermoforming group at Solo Cup Company for two years. Prior to that, Mr. Patterson was Manager of Corporate Accounting for Transilwrap Company for three years. Mr. Patterson received a Bachelor of Science degree in finance from Northern Illinois University and an MBA from the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Stanley M. Brown, Director. Mr. Brown was appointed as a director of the Company in January 1996. Since March 1996, Mr. Brown has been President of Inn-Room Systems, Inc., a manufacturer and lessor of in-room vending systems for hotels. From 1968 to 1989, Mr. Brown was with the United States Navy as a naval aviator, achieving the rank of Captain.

Bret Tayne, Director. Mr. Tayne was appointed as a director of the Company in December 1997. Mr. Tayne has been the President of Everede Tool Company, a manufacturer of industrial cutting tools, since January 1992. Prior to that, Mr. Tayne was Executive Vice President of Unifin, a commercial finance company, since 1986. Mr. Tayne received a Bachelor of Science degree from Tufts University and an MBA from Northwestern University.

Michael Avramovich, Director. Mr. Avramovich is a principal of the law firm of Avramovich & Associates, P.C. of Chicago, Illinois, and has been engaged in the practice of law for over 7 years. Prior to the practice of law, Mr. Avramovich was an Associate Professor of Accounting and Finance at National-Louis University in Chicago, Illinois. Mr. Avramovich has also worked in various financial accounting positions at Molex International, Inc. of Lisle, Illinois. Mr. Avramovich received a Bachelor of Arts degree in History and International Relations from North Park University, a Master of Management, Accounting and Information Systems, and Finance from Northwestern University, a Juris Doctorate from the John Marshall Law School and an L.L.M. in International and Corporate Law from Georgetown University Law Center.

John I. Collins, Director. Mr. Collins is currently the Treasurer of the Illinois Credit Union Executives Society, and is a former member of the Chicago Federal Reserve Bank Advisory Group. Mr. Collins is also the Chief Administrative Officer and the former Chief Financial Officer of Mid-States Corporate Federal Credit Union (“MSCFCU”), a $4.5 billion wholesale financial institution located in Warrenville, Illinois. Mr. Collins’ responsibilities at MSCFCU have included all accounting, financial reporting, strategic planning, risk management, lending and data processing matters, as well as, more recently, working directly with MSCFCU’s Chief Executive Officer in matters concerning MSCFCU’s Board of Directors and Board Committee matters and administration, corporate governance and legal affairs. Prior to his affiliation with MSCFCU in 2001, Mr. Collins was employed as both a Controller and Chief Financial Officer by Great Lakes Credit Union (“GLCU”), a $350 million financial institution located in North Chicago, Illinois. During Mr. Collins tenure with GLCU from 1991 to 2001, and MSCFCU from 2001 to the present, Mr. Collins has experience working with audit committees, public accounting firms and regulatory agencies on an ongoing basis, has supervised principal accounting officers, and has had the responsibility of preparing audited financial statements, internal controls and financial reporting. Mr. Collins received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics, History and English from Ripon College, and a Masters in Business Administration from Emory University. Mr. Collins has also participated in the Kellogg Management Institute

32

and the Consumer Marketing Strategy programs at Northwestern University on a post-graduate basis.

John H. Schwan and Howard W. Schwan are brothers.

Audit Committee

Since 2000, the Company has had a standing Audit Committee, which is presently composed of Mr. Tayne, Mr. Brown and Mr. Avramovich. Mr. Avramovich has been designated and is the Company’s “Audit Committee Financial Expert” pursuant to paragraph (h)(1)(i)(A) of Item 401 of Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee held 4 meetings during fiscal year 2004, including quarterly meetings with management and independent auditors to discuss the Company’s financial statements. Mr. Avramovich and each appointed member of the Audit Committee satisfies the definition of “independent” as that term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Company about its financial reporting requirements. Information regarding the functions performed by the Committee is set forth in the “Report of the Audit Committee,” as follows:

Report of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Committee reviewed the audited financial statements in the Annual Report with management including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

The Committee reviewed with the independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company’s accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Committee under generally accepted auditing standards, including but not limited to those matters required to be discussed by SAS 61 (Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, AU ss.380). In addition, the Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the auditor’s independence from management and the Company including the matters in the written disclosures required by the Independence Standards Board.

The Committee discussed with the Company’s independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Committee meets with the independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board has approved) that the audited financial statements be

33

included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Committee and the Board have also recommended, subject to future shareholder approval at the Company’s 2005 annual meeting of shareholders, the selection of Weiser, LLP as the Company’s independent auditors.

Michael Avramovich, Audit Committee Chair
Stanley M. Brown, III, Audit Committee Member
Bret Tayne, Audit Committee Member

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company’s officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and with the NASDAQ Stock Market. Officers, directors and greater than ten-percent shareholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely on a review of such forms furnished to the Company, or written representations that no Form 5’s were required, the Company believes that during calendar year 2004, it was in compliance with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to the officers, directors and ten-percent beneficial shareholders.

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its senior executive and financial officers. The Company’s Code of Ethics seeks to promote (1) honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships, (2) full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure of information to the Commission, (3) compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations, (4) prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code to predesignated persons, and (5) accountability for adherence to the Code.

Item No. 11 Executive Compensation

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the compensation paid or accrued by the Company to its President, Chief Executive Officer and any other officer who received compensation in excess of $100,000 (“Named Executive Officers”).

34

———————————

Certain Named Executive Officers have received warrants to purchase Common Stock of the Company in connection with their guarantee of certain bank loans secured by the Company and in connection with their participation in a private offering of notes and warrants conducted by the Company. See “Board of Director Affiliations and Related Transactions” below. There were no stock option grants made by the Company in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and FY-End Option Values

35

Equity Compensation Plan Information

                The following table provides information regarding the Company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2004.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2004, the Compensation Committee was composed of Stanley M. Brown and Brent Tayne. The Compensation Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning the compensation of officers and key employees of the Company. The Compensation Committee met one time during 2004.

Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company is composed of two members of the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing the standards and philosophy of the Board of Directors regarding executive compensation, for reviewing and evaluating executive compensation and compensation programs, and for recommending levels of salary and other forms of compensation for executives of the Company to the Board of Directors. The full Board of Directors of the Company is responsible for setting and administering salaries, bonus payments and other compensation awards to executives of the Company.

36

Compensation Philosophy

The philosophy of the Compensation Committee, and of the Board of Directors of the Company, regarding executive compensation includes the following principal components:

The Compensation Committee has recommended, and the Board of Directors has determined, to take appropriate action to comply with the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code so that executive compensation will be deductible as an expense to the fullest extent allowable.

The Company’s executive compensation program consists of two key elements:
(i) an annual component consisting of base salary and (ii) a long-term component, principally stock options.

Annual Base Compensation

The Compensation Committee recommends annual salary levels for each of the Named Executives, and for other senior executives of the Company, to the Board of Directors. The recommendations of the Compensation Committee for base salary levels for senior executives of the Company are determined annually, in part, by evaluating the responsibilities of the position and examining market compensation levels and trends for similar positions in the marketplace.

Additional factors which the Compensation Committee considers in recommending annual adjustments to base salaries include: results of operation of the Company, sales, shareholder returns, and the experience, work-performance, leadership and team building skills of each executive. The Company receives information from the Chief Executive Officer with regard to these matters. While each of these factors is considered in relatively equal weight, the Compensation Committee does not utilize performance matrices or measured weightings in its review. Each year, the Compensation Committee conducts a structured review of base compensation of senior executives with input from the Chief Executive Officer.

Long-Term Component - Stock Options

The long-term component of compensation provided to executives of the Company has been in the form of stock options. The Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of

37

Directors that a significant portion of the total compensation to executives be in the form of incentive stock options. Stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to or greater than the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of the grant. Stock options are exercisable between one and ten years from the date granted. Such stock options provide incentive for the creation of shareholder value over the long-term since the full benefit of the compensation package for an executive cannot be realized unless an appreciation in the price of the Company’s Common Stock occurs over a specified number of years.

The magnitude of the stock option awards are determined annually by the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors. Generally, the number of options granted to an executive has been based on the relative salary level of the executive.

On October 12, 2002, incentive stock options to purchase up to 14,285, 8,928, 5,952 and 5,952 shares of the Company’s Common Stock were granted to Messrs. Howard Schwan, Brent Anderson, Stephen M. Merrick and John Schwan, respectively, under the 2002 Stock Option Plan (the “2002 Plan”). In addition, on October 12, 2002, non-qualified stock options to purchase up to 2,926 shares of the Company’s Common Stock were granted to each of Messrs. Stan Brown and Bret Tayne respectively, under the 2002 Plan, and incentive stock options to purchase up to 5,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock were granted to Timothy Patterson under the 2002 Stock Option Plan on December 31, 2003.

There were no other stock options granted to any of the Named Executives in 2002, 2003 or 2004.

Employment Agreements

In June 1997, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Howard W. Schwan as President, which provides for an annual salary of not less than $135,000. The term of the Agreement was through June 30, 2002 and is automatically renewed thereafter for successive one year terms. The Agreement contains covenants of Mr. Schwan with respect to the use of the Company’s confidential information, establishes the Company’s right to inventions created by Mr. Schwan during the term of his employment, and includes a covenant of Mr. Schwan not to compete with the Company for a period of three years after the date of termination of the Agreement.

CEO Compensation

The Compensation Committee utilizes the same standards and methods for recommending annual base compensation for the Chief Executive Officer of the Company as it does for other senior executive officers of the Company.

In 1997, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Howard W. Schwan, President of the Company, providing that Mr. Schwan’s base annual compensation would not be less than $135,000. During 2002, 2003 and 2004, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the base salary of Mr. Schwan was $162,500, $162,500 and $153,000, respectively. In 2002, 2003 and 2004, annual incentive compensation was paid to Mr. Schwan in the amounts of $8,100, $5,520 and $5,520 respectively.

The Compensation Committee has evaluated the compensation of Mr. Schwan in light of the results of operation of the Company and in comparison to compensation levels of similar companies. The Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Schwan’s level of base compensation was $153,000. In light of that review, the Compensation Committee recommended no change in the compensation of Mr. Schwan during 2004, and also did not recommend any incentive compensation for Mr. Schwan or other of the named executives.

Compensation Committee:
Brent Tayne and Stanley M. Brown

38

Comparative Stock Price Performance Graph/Table

The following table compares, for the period January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2004, the cumulative total return (assuming reinvestment of dividends) on the Company’s Common Stock with (i) NASDAQ Stock Market Index (U.S.) and (ii) a peer group including the following companies: S&P 500 Specialty Stores. The table assumes an investment of $100 on January 1, 2000, in the Company’s Common Stock and each of the other investment categories.

39

Director Compensation

John Schwan was compensated in the amount of $24,000 in fiscal 2004 for his services as Chairman of the Board of Directors. Directors other than members of management received a fee of $1,000 for each Board meeting attended.

Item No. 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

Principal Stockholders

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company’s capital stock, as of March 31, 2005, by (i) each stockholder who is known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s Common Stock, (ii) each director and executive officer of the Company who owns any shares of Common Stock and (iii) all executive officers and directors as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, the Company believes that the beneficial owners of the shares listed below have sole investment and voting power with respect to such shares.

* Less than one percent

(footnotes continued on next page)

40

(footnotes continued on next page)

41

Item No. 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Stephen M. Merrick, Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Company, is a principal of the law firm of Merrick & Associates, P.C., which serves as general counsel of the Company. In addition, Mr. Merrick is a principal stockholder of the Company. No other employee or principal of the firm of Merrick & Associates, P.C. owns any shares of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock. Legal fees incurred from the firm of Merrick & Associates, P.C. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 was $97,000. In 2004, Mr. Merrick was paid $48,000 for services provided to the company. Mr. Merrick is also an officer and director of Reliv International, Inc. (NASDAQ-RELV).

John H. Schwan is President of Packaging Systems, L.L.C. and affiliated companies. The Company made purchases of packaging materials from these entities in the amount of $172,000 during the year ended December 31, 2004. In 2004, Mr. Schwan was paid $24,000 for services provided to the Company.

During 2004 and 2003, John H Schwan loaned to Flexo Universal the aggregate amount of $86,000 and $225,000, respectively. During 2004 and 2003, Stephen M. Merrick loaned to Flexo Universal the aggregate amount of $181,000 and $25,000, respectively. These advances are reflected in notes and bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum.

The Company entered into a 10-year lease agreement for office and warehouse facilities in November 1999, requiring monthly payments of $17,404 to Pepper Road, Inc., a company related through common ownership. In 2003, the rent was reduced to $15,500 per month. Approximately 50% of the facility was subleased through March 2002, and after that, the Company assumed the remaining 50% of the facility. In July of 2004, the company signed a lease with HP Properties LLC for approximately 35,000 square feet of space in Cary, Illinois. In July of 2004, the Company cancelled its lease with Pepper Road, Inc.

In July 2001, certain members of company management were issued warrants to purchase 119,050 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share in consideration of their facilitating and guaranteeing and securing bank loans to the Company in the amount of $1.4 million and for advancing additional monies to the company that were repaid in 2001. The warrants have a term of five years.

In February 2003, the Company received $1,630,000 from certain shareholders in exchange for (a) two year 9% subordinated notes, and (b) five year warrants to purchase 163,000 common shares at $4.87 per share. The proceeds were to (i) re-finance the bank loan of CTI Mexico in the amount of $880,000 and (ii) to provide financing for CTI Mexico and Flexo Universal. The value of the warrants was $640,427 calculated using Black-Scholes option pricing formula. The Company applied the debt discount of $459,780 against the subordinated debt. The debt discount was amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the debt.

At various times during 2003, John H. Schwan loaned an aggregate of $795,204 to the Company in exchange for notes bearing interest at 8%. These notes are subordinated to the bank loan of the Company.

42

The Company believes that each of the transactions set forth above were entered into, and any future related party transactions will be entered into, on terms as fair as those obtainable from independent third parties. All related party transactions must be approved by a majority of disinterested directors and subject to review in the context of the Company’s Code of Ethics.

Item No. 14 Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table sets forth the aggregate amount of audit fees and all other fees billed by the Company’s independent auditor, for the years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004:

(See Item No. 9 - “Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure”)

43

All audit, tax, and other services to be performed by Weiser, LLP for the Company must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews the description of the services and an estimate of the anticipated costs of performing those services. Services not previously approved cannot commence until such approval has been granted. Pre-approval is granted usually at regularly scheduled meetings. If unanticipated items arise between meetings of the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee has delegated approval authority to the Chairman of the Audit Committee, in which case the Chairman communicates such pre-approvals to the full Committee at its next meeting. During 2004, all services performed by Eisner LLP, the Company’s previous independent auditors and Weiser, LLP, were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with this policy.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors reviews all relationships with its independent auditors, including the provision of non-audit services, which may relate to the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors considered the effect of Weiser, LLP’s tax services in assessing the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm and concluded that the provision of such services by Weiser LLP was compatible with the maintenance of that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions.

Part IV.

Item No. 15 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 

3.1

Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation of CTI Industries Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A contained in Registrant’s Schedule 14A Definitive Proxy Statement for solicitation of written consent of shareholders, as filed with the Commission on October 25, 1999)

3.2

By-laws of CTI Industries Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibits, contained in Registrant’s Form SB-2 Registration Statement (File No. 333-31969) effective November 5, 1997)

44

45

46

23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Eisner, LLP

23.3

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

27

Financial Data Schedule

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended

32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

47

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on May 9, 2005.

                In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.