Document/ExhibitDescriptionPagesSize 1: 10-K Annual Report HTML 2.91M
3: EX-10.14 2019 Ameren Executive Incentive Plan HTML 86K
4: EX-10.19 2019 Base Salary Table for Named Executive HTML 51K
Officers
5: EX-10.22 Change of Control Severance Plan HTML 46K
6: EX-10.27 Formula for Determining 2019 Target Psu and Rsu HTML 46K
Awards
7: EX-10.34 2019 Performance Share Unit Award Agreement HTML 115K
8: EX-10.35 2019 Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement HTML 91K
9: EX-10.36 Ameren Corporation Severance Plan for Ameren HTML 96K
Officers
2: EX-10.4 Summary Sheet of Ameren Non-Management Director HTML 46K
Compensation
10: EX-21.1 Subsidiaries of Ameren HTML 48K
11: EX-23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public HTML 44K
Accounting Firm
12: EX-23.2 Consent of Independent Registered Public HTML 43K
Accounting Firm
13: EX-23.3 Consent of Independent Registered Public HTML 43K
Accounting Firm
14: EX-24.1 Power of Attorney HTML 52K
15: EX-24.2 Power of Attorney HTML 48K
16: EX-24.3 Power of Attorney HTML 47K
17: EX-31.1 Certification -- §302 - SOA'02 HTML 48K
18: EX-31.2 Certification -- §302 - SOA'02 HTML 48K
19: EX-31.3 Certification -- §302 - SOA'02 HTML 48K
20: EX-31.4 Certification -- §302 - SOA'02 HTML 48K
21: EX-31.5 Certification -- §302 - SOA'02 HTML 48K
22: EX-31.6 Certification -- §302 - SOA'02 HTML 48K
23: EX-32.1 Certification -- §906 - SOA'02 HTML 46K
24: EX-32.2 Certification -- §906 - SOA'02 HTML 46K
25: EX-32.3 Certification -- §906 - SOA'02 HTML 46K
32: R1 Document And Entity Information HTML 92K
33: R2 Consolidated Statement Of Income (Loss) HTML 158K
34: R3 Consolidated Statement Of Income (Loss) HTML 48K
(Parenthetical)
35: R4 Consolidated Balance Sheet HTML 219K
36: R5 Consolidated Balance Sheet (Parenthetical) HTML 60K
37: R6 Consolidated Statement Of Cash Flows HTML 196K
38: R7 Consolidated Statement Of Cash Flows HTML 48K
(Parenthetical)
39: R8 Consolidated Statement Of Stockholders' Equity HTML 146K
40: R9 Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 212K
41: R10 Rate And Regulatory Matters HTML 304K
42: R11 Property And Plant, Net HTML 176K
43: R12 Short-Term Debt And Liquidity HTML 102K
44: R13 Long-Term Debt And Equity Financings HTML 304K
45: R14 Other Income, Net HTML 109K
46: R15 Derivative Financial Instruments HTML 165K
47: R16 Fair Value Measurements HTML 471K
48: R17 Callaway Energy Center HTML 132K
49: R18 Retirement Benefits HTML 628K
50: R19 Stock-Based Compensation HTML 105K
51: R20 Income Taxes HTML 344K
52: R21 Related Party Transactions HTML 167K
53: R22 Commitments And Contingencies HTML 277K
54: R23 Segment Information HTML 607K
55: R24 Selected Quarterly Information HTML 163K
56: R25 Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information Of HTML 320K
Parent
57: R26 Schedule II - Valuation And Qualifying Accounts HTML 117K
58: R27 Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 204K
(Policy)
59: R28 Derivative Financial Instruments (Policies) HTML 51K
60: R29 Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 164K
(Tables)
61: R30 Rate And Regulatory Matters (Tables) HTML 261K
62: R31 Property And Plant, Net (Tables) HTML 181K
63: R32 Short-Term Debt And Liquidity (Tables) HTML 91K
64: R33 Long-Term Debt And Equity Financings (Tables) HTML 300K
65: R34 Other Income, Net (Tables) HTML 122K
66: R35 Derivative Financial Instruments (Tables) HTML 162K
67: R36 Fair Value Measurements (Tables) HTML 469K
68: R37 Callaway Energy Center (Tables) HTML 128K
69: R38 Retirement Benefits (Tables) HTML 641K
70: R39 Stock-Based Compensation (Tables) HTML 98K
71: R40 Income Taxes (Tables) HTML 341K
72: R41 Related Party Transactions (Tables) HTML 162K
73: R42 Commitments And Contingencies (Tables) HTML 259K
74: R43 Segment Information (Tables) HTML 608K
75: R44 Selected Quarterly Information (Tables) HTML 163K
76: R45 Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 98K
(Narrative) (Details)
77: R46 Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 59K
(Schedule Of Inventories) (Details)
78: R47 Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 51K
(Schedule Of Rates Used For Allowance For Funds
Used During Construction) (Details)
79: R48 Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 75K
(Schedule Of Asset Retirement Obligations)
(Details)
80: R49 Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 51K
(Schedule Of Excise Taxes) (Details)
81: R50 Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies (Basic HTML 50K
and Diluted Earnings Per Share Calculations)
(Details)
82: R51 Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies (Cash HTML 72K
and Cash Equivalents) (Details) (Details)
83: R52 Rate and Regulatory Matters (Narrative-Missouri) HTML 147K
(Details)
84: R53 Rate And Regulatory Matters (Narrative-Illinois) HTML 97K
(Details)
85: R54 Rate and Regulatory Matters (Narrative-Federal) HTML 76K
(Details)
86: R55 Rate And Regulatory Matters (Schedule Of HTML 191K
Regulatory Assets And Liabilities) (Details)
87: R56 Property And Plant, Net (Schedule Of Property And HTML 125K
Plant, Net) (Details)
88: R57 Property And Plant, Net (Accrued Capital HTML 56K
Expenditures) (Details)
89: R58 Property and Plant, Net (Schedule of Capitalized HTML 65K
Software) (Details)
90: R59 Short-Term Debt And Liquidity (Narrative) HTML 77K
(Details)
91: R60 Short-Term Debt And Liquidity (Schedule Of Maximum HTML 57K
Aggregate Amount Available On Credit Agreements)
(Details)
92: R61 Short-Term Debt And Liquidity (Commercial Paper) HTML 65K
(Details)
93: R62 Long-Term Debt And Equity Financings (Narrative) HTML 158K
(Details)
94: R63 Long-Term Debt And Equity Financings (Schedule Of HTML 234K
Long-Term Debt Outstanding) (Details)
95: R64 Long-Term Debt And Equity Financings (Schedule Of HTML 59K
Average Interest Rates) (Details)
96: R65 Long-Term Debt And Equity Financings (Schedule Of HTML 80K
Maturities Of Long-Term Debt) (Details)
97: R66 Long-Term Debt And Equity Financings (Schedule Of HTML 139K
Outstanding Preferred Stock) (Details)
98: R67 Long-Term Debt and Equity Financings (Schedule of HTML 63K
Required and Actual Debt Ratios) (Details)
99: R68 Other Income, Net (Other Income And Expenses) HTML 75K
(Details)
100: R69 Derivative Financial Instruments (Open Gross HTML 58K
Derivative Volumes By Commodity Type) (Details)
101: R70 Derivative Financial Instruments (Derivative HTML 99K
Instruments Carrying Value) (Details)
102: R71 Derivative Financial Instruments (Derivative HTML 56K
Instruments With Credit Risk-Related Contingent
Features) (Details)
103: R72 Fair Value Measurements (Schedule of Valuation HTML 75K
Process and Unobservable Inputs) (Details)
104: R73 Fair Value Measurements (Schedule Of Fair Value HTML 182K
Hierarchy Of Assets And Liabilities Measured At
Fair Value On Recurring Basis) (Details)
105: R74 Fair Value Measurements (Schedule Of Changes In HTML 74K
The Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities
Classified As Level 3 In The Fair Value Hierarchy)
(Details)
106: R75 Fair Value Measurements (Schedule Of Carrying HTML 114K
Amounts And Estimated Fair Values Of Financial
Assets and Liabilities) (Details)
107: R76 Callaway Energy Center (Details) HTML 50K
108: R77 Callaway Energy Center (Proceeds From The Sale Of HTML 60K
Investments And Related Gross Realized Gains And
Losses In Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Fund)
(Details)
109: R78 Callaway Energy Center (Fair Values Of Investments HTML 92K
In Debt And Equity Securities In Nuclear
Decommissioning Trust Fund) (Details)
110: R79 Callaway Energy Center (Cost and Fair Values of HTML 68K
Investments In Debt Securities in Nuclear
Decommissioning Trust Fund According to
Contractual Maturities) (Details)
111: R80 Callaway Energy Center (Insurance Disclosure) HTML 85K
(Details)
112: R81 Retirement Benefits (Narrative) (Details) HTML 74K
113: R82 Retirement Benefits (Summary Of Benefit Liability HTML 52K
Recorded) (Details)
114: R83 Retirement Benefits (Funded Status Of Benefit HTML 141K
Plans And Amounts Included In Regulatory Assets
And OCI) (Details)
115: R84 Retirement Benefits (Assumptions Used To Determine HTML 61K
Benefit Obligations) (Details)
116: R85 Retirement Benefits (Cash Contributions Made To HTML 62K
Benefit Plans) (Details)
117: R86 Retirement Benefits (Target Allocation Of The HTML 114K
Plans' Asset Categories) (Details)
118: R87 Retirement Benefits (Fair Value Of Plan Assets HTML 220K
Utilizing Fair Value Hierarchy) (Details)
119: R88 Retirement Benefits (Components Of Net Periodic HTML 81K
Benefit Cost) (Details)
120: R89 Retirement Benefits (Summary Of Estimated HTML 57K
Amortizable Amounts From Regulatory Assets and
Accumulated OCI Into Net Periodic Benefit Cost)
(Details)
121: R90 Retirement Benefits (Summary Of Benefit Plan Costs HTML 61K
Incurred) (Details)
122: R91 Retirement Benefits (Schedule Of Expected Payments HTML 70K
From Qualified Trust And Company Funds) (Details)
123: R92 Retirement Benefits (Assumptions Used To Determine HTML 65K
Net Periodic Benefit Cost) (Details)
124: R93 Retirement Benefits (Schedule Of Potential Changes HTML 69K
In Key Assumptions) (Details)
125: R94 Retirement Benefits (Schedule Of Matching HTML 54K
Contributions) (Details)
126: R95 Stock-Based Compensation (Narrative) (Details) HTML 78K
127: R96 Stock-Based Compensation (Summary Of Nonvested HTML 95K
Shares) (Details)
128: R97 Stock-Based Compensation (Summary of Expense) HTML 76K
(Details)
129: R98 Income Taxes (Narrative) (Details) HTML 83K
130: R99 Income Taxes (Schedule of Remeasurement of HTML 72K
Deferred Income Taxes due to the Tax Cuts and Jobs
Act) (Details)
131: R100 Income Taxes (Schedule Of Effective Income Tax HTML 95K
Rate Reconciliation) (Details)
132: R101 Income Taxes (Schedule Of Components Of Income Tax HTML 80K
Expense (Benefit)) (Details)
133: R102 Income Taxes (Schedule Of Deferred Tax Assets And HTML 79K
Liabilities Resulting From Temporary Differences)
(Details)
134: R103 Income Taxes (Schedule Of Net Operating Loss HTML 99K
Carryforwards And Tax Credit Carryforwards)
(Details)
135: R104 Related Party Transactions (Details) HTML 83K
136: R105 Related Party Transactions (Narrative) (Details) HTML 72K
137: R106 Related Party Transactions (Schedule of affiliate HTML 63K
receivables and payables) (Details)
138: R107 Related Party Transactions (Schedule of Capital HTML 52K
Contributions) (Details)
139: R108 Commitments And Contingencies (Schedule Of Lease HTML 148K
Obligations) (Details)
140: R109 Commitments And Contingencies (Schedule Of HTML 129K
Estimated Purchased Power Commitments) (Details)
141: R110 Commitments And Contingencies (Environmental HTML 80K
Matters) (Details)
142: R111 Segment Information (Schedule Of Segment Reporting HTML 166K
Information By Segment) (Details)
143: R112 Segment Information (Disaggregation of Revenues) HTML 209K
(Details)
144: R113 Selected Quarterly Information (Summary Of HTML 95K
Selected Quarterly Information) (Details)
145: R114 Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information Of HTML 105K
Parent (Statement of Income) (Details)
146: R115 Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information Of HTML 152K
Parent (Balance Sheet) (Details)
147: R116 Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information Of HTML 108K
Parent (Statement of Cash Flows) (Details)
148: R117 Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information Of HTML 60K
Parent Cash and Cash Equivalents (Details)
149: R118 Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information Of HTML 46K
Parent Guarantees (Details)
150: R119 Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information Of HTML 56K
Parent Other Income (Expense), Net (Details)
151: R120 Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information Of HTML 56K
Parent Income Taxes (Details)
152: R121 Schedule II - Valuation And Qualifying Accounts HTML 69K
(Details)
154: XML IDEA XML File -- Filing Summary XML 280K
153: EXCEL IDEA Workbook of Financial Reports XLSX 247K
26: EX-101.INS XBRL Instance -- aee-20181231 XML 15.70M
28: EX-101.CAL XBRL Calculations -- aee-20181231_cal XML 396K
29: EX-101.DEF XBRL Definitions -- aee-20181231_def XML 2.43M
30: EX-101.LAB XBRL Labels -- aee-20181231_lab XML 3.50M
31: EX-101.PRE XBRL Presentations -- aee-20181231_pre XML 2.64M
27: EX-101.SCH XBRL Schema -- aee-20181231 XSD 447K
155: ZIP XBRL Zipped Folder -- 0001002910-19-000094-xbrl Zip 797K
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
The following security is registered pursuant to Section 12(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange:
Registrant
Title of each class
Ameren Corporation
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Registrant
Title
of each class
Union Electric Company
Preferred Stock, cumulative, no par value, stated value $100 per share
Ameren Illinois Company
Preferred Stock, cumulative, $100 par value per share
Depositary Shares, each representing one-fourth of a share of 6.625% Preferred Stock, cumulative, $100 par value per share
Indicate by checkmark if each registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Ameren
Corporation
Yes
ý
No
¨
Union Electric Company
Yes
¨
No
ý
Ameren Illinois Company
Yes
¨
No
ý
Indicate
by checkmark if each registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Ameren Corporation
Yes
¨
No
ý
Union Electric Company
Yes
¨
No
ý
Ameren
Illinois Company
Yes
¨
No
ý
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrants: (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Ameren
Corporation
Yes
ý
No
¨
Union Electric Company
Yes
ý
No
¨
Ameren Illinois Company
Yes
ý
No
¨
Indicate
by checkmark whether each registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Ameren Corporation
Yes
ý
No
¨
Union
Electric Company
Yes
ý
No
¨
Ameren Illinois Company
Yes
ý
No
¨
Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of each registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Ameren Corporation
ý
Union Electric Company
ý
Ameren
Illinois Company
ý
Indicate by checkmark whether each registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,”“accelerated filer,”“smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
Accelerated
Filer
Accelerated
Filer
Non-accelerated
Filer
Smaller
Reporting
Company
Emerging
Growth Company
Ameren Corporation
ý
¨
¨
¨
¨
Union Electric Company
¨
¨
ý
¨
¨
Ameren
Illinois Company
¨
¨
ý
¨
¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended
transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Ameren Corporation
¨
Union Electric Company
¨
Ameren Illinois Company
¨
Indicate
by checkmark whether each registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Ameren Corporation
Yes
¨
No
ý
Union Electric Company
Yes
¨
No
ý
Ameren
Illinois Company
Yes
¨
No
ý
As of June 29, 2018, the aggregate market value of Ameren Corporation’s common stock, $0.01 par value, (based upon the closing price of the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 29, 2018) held by nonaffiliates was $14,783,320,074. All of the shares of common stock of the other registrants were held by Ameren Corporation as
of June 29, 2018.
The number of shares outstanding of each registrant’s classes of common stock as of January 31, 2019, were as follows:
Ameren Corporation
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share: 244,638,879
Union Electric Company
Common
stock, $5 par value per share, held by Ameren
Corporation (parent company of the registrant): 102,123,834
Ameren Illinois Company
Common stock, no par value, held by Ameren
Corporation (parent company of the registrant): 25,452,373
Portions of the definitive proxy statement of Ameren Corporation and portions of the definitive information statements of Union Electric Company and Ameren Illinois Company for the 2019
annual meetings of shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
This combined Form 10-K is separately filed by Ameren Corporation, Union Electric Company, and Ameren Illinois Company. Each registrant hereto is filing on its own behalf all of the information contained in this annual report that relates to such registrant. Each registrant hereto is not filing any information that does not relate to such registrant, and therefore makes no representation as to any such information.
This report contains “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements should be read with the cautionary statements and important factors under the heading “Forward-looking Statements.” Forward-looking statements are all statements other than statements of historical fact, including those statements that are identified by the use of the
words “anticipates,”“estimates,”“expects,”“intends,”“plans,”“predicts,”“projects,” and similar expressions.
We use the words “our,”“we” or “us” with respect to certain information that relates to Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois, collectively. When appropriate, subsidiaries of Ameren Corporation are named specifically as their various business activities are discussed.
2014 Incentive Plan – The 2014 Omnibus Incentive
Compensation Plan, which provides for compensatory stock-based awards to eligible employees and directors.
2017 IRP – Integrated Resource Plan, a 20-year nonbinding plan Ameren Missouri filed with the MoPSC in September 2017, which includes Ameren Missouri’s preferred approach for meeting customers’ projected long-term energy needs in a cost-effective manner while maintaining system reliability.
Ameren – Ameren Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. In references to financing activities, acquisition activities, or liquidity arrangements, Ameren is defined as Ameren Corporation, the parent.
Ameren Companies – Ameren Corporation, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois, collectively, which are individual registrants within the Ameren consolidated group.
Ameren
Illinois Electric Distribution – An Ameren Corporation and Ameren Illinois financial reporting segment consisting of the rate-regulated electric distribution business of Ameren Illinois.
Ameren Illinois Transmission – An Ameren Illinois financial reporting segment consisting of the rate-regulated electric transmission business of Ameren Illinois.
Ameren Illinois Natural Gas – An Ameren Corporation and Ameren Illinois financial reporting segment consisting of the rate-regulated natural gas distribution business of Ameren Illinois.
Ameren Illinois – Ameren Illinois Company, an Ameren Corporation subsidiary that operates rate-regulated electric transmission, electric distribution, and natural gas distribution businesses in Illinois, doing business
as Ameren Illinois.
Ameren Missouri – Union Electric Company, an Ameren Corporation subsidiary that operates a rate-regulated electric generation, transmission, and distribution business and a rate-regulated natural gas distribution business in Missouri, doing business as Ameren Missouri. Ameren Missouri is also defined as a financial reporting segment of Ameren.
Ameren Services – Ameren Services Company, an Ameren Corporation subsidiary that provides support services, such as accounting, legal, treasury, and asset management services, to Ameren (parent) and its subsidiaries.
Ameren Transmission – An Ameren Corporation financial reporting segment primarily consisting of the aggregated electric transmission businesses of Ameren Illinois and ATXI.
AMIL
– A MISO balancing authority area operated by Ameren, which includes the load of Ameren Illinois and ATXI.
AMMO – A MISO balancing authority area operated by Ameren, which includes the load and energy centers of Ameren Missouri.
ARO – Asset retirement obligations.
ATXI – Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois, an Ameren Corporation subsidiary that is engaged in the construction and operation of electric transmission assets.
Baseload – The minimum amount of electric power delivered or required over a given period of time at a steady rate.
Btu – British thermal unit, a standard unit for measuring the quantity of heat energy required to raise
the temperature of one pound of water by one degree Fahrenheit.
CCR – Coal combustion residuals, which include fly ash, bottom ash, boiler slag, and flue gas desulfurization materials generated from burning coal to generate electricity.
CCR Rule – Coal Combustion Residuals Rule, a rule promulgated by the EPA that established regulations for the disposal of CCR in landfills and surface impoundments.
CILCO – Central Illinois Light Company, a former Ameren Corporation subsidiary that was merged with CIPS and IP to form Ameren Illinois.
CIPS – Central Illinois Public Service Company, a predecessor to Ameren Illinois.
Clean Power Plan – “Carbon
Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units,” an EPA rule, which would have established emission guidelines for states to follow in developing plans to reduce CO2 emissions from existing fossil-fuel-fired electric generating units. In August 2018, the EPA proposed to repeal and replace the Clean Power Plan with a proposed new rule known as the Affordable Clean Energy Rule.
CO2 – Carbon dioxide.
Cooling degree days – The summation of positive differences between the average daily temperature and a 65-degree Fahrenheit base. This statistic is useful as an indicator of electricity demand by residential and commercial customers for summer cooling.
Credit
Agreements – The Illinois Credit Agreement and the Missouri Credit Agreement, collectively.
CSAPR – Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, an EPA rule that requires states that contribute to air pollution in downwind states to limit air emissions from fossil-fuel-fired electric generating units.
CT – Combustion turbine, used primarily for peaking electric generation capacity.
Dekatherm – A standard unit of energy equivalent to approximately one million Btus.
DOE – Department of Energy, a United States government agency.
DRPlus – Ameren Corporation’s dividend reinvestment and direct stock purchase plan.
Electric
margins – Electric revenues less fuel and purchased power costs.
EMANI – European Mutual Association for Nuclear Insurance.
EPA – Environmental Protection Agency, a United States government agency.
ERISA – Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.
Excess deferred taxes – The amount of income taxes previously collected from customers that will be returned to customers over periods of time determined
by our regulators.
Exchange Act – Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
FAC – Fuel adjustment clause, a fuel and purchased power cost recovery mechanism that allows Ameren Missouri to recover or refund, through customer rates, 95% of the variance in net energy costs from the amount set in base rates without a traditional rate proceeding, subject to MoPSC prudence reviews.
FASB – Financial Accounting Standards Board, a rulemaking organization that establishes financial accounting and reporting standards in the United States.
FEJA – Future Energy Jobs Act, a 2016 Illinois law affecting electric distribution
utilities. This law allows Ameren Illinois to earn a return on its electric energy-efficiency investments, decouples electric distribution revenues from sales volumes, offers customer rebates for installing distributed generation, and includes extensions and modifications of certain IEIMA performance-based framework provisions, among other things.
FERC – Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, a United States government agency.
FTR – Financial transmission right, a financial instrument that specifies whether the holder shall pay or receive compensation for certain congestion-related transmission charges between two designated points.
GAAP – Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.
Heating degree days
– The summation of negative differences between the average daily temperature and a 65-degree Fahrenheit base. This statistic is useful as an indicator of demand for electricity and natural gas for winter heating by residential and commercial customers.
ICC – Illinois Commerce Commission, a state agency that regulates Illinois utility businesses, including Ameren Illinois and ATXI.
IEIMA – Illinois Energy Infrastructure Modernization Act, an Illinois law that established a performance-based formula process for determining electric distribution service rates. The formula ratemaking process expires in 2022, unless extended.
Illinois Credit Agreement – Ameren’s and Ameren Illinois’ $1.1 billion senior unsecured credit agreement,
which expires in December 2022, unless extended.
IP – Illinois Power Company, a former Ameren Corporation subsidiary that merged with CIPS and CILCO to form Ameren Illinois.
IPA – Illinois Power Agency, a state government agency that has broad authority to assist in the procurement of electric power for residential and small commercial customers.
IRS – Internal Revenue Service, a United States government agency.
ISRS – Infrastructure system replacement surcharge, a cost recovery mechanism that allows Ameren Missouri to recover natural gas infrastructure replacement costs from customers without a traditional rate proceeding.
Kilowatthour –
A measure of electricity consumption equivalent to the use of 1,000 watts of power over one hour.
MATS – Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, an EPA rule that limits emissions of mercury and other air toxics from coal- and oil-fired electric generating units.
MEEIA – Missouri Energy Efficiency Investment Act, a Missouri law that allows electric utilities to recover costs related to MoPSC-approved customer energy-efficiency programs.
MEEIA 2013 – Ameren Missouri’s portfolio of customer energy-efficiency programs, recovery of lost electric margins, and performance incentive for 2013 through 2015, pursuant to the MEEIA, as approved by the MoPSC in August 2012.
MEEIA 2016 –
Ameren Missouri’s portfolio of customer energy-efficiency programs, recovery of lost electric margins, and performance incentive for March 2016 through February 2019, pursuant to the MEEIA, as approved by the MoPSC in February 2016.
MEEIA 2019 – Ameren Missouri’s portfolio of customer energy-efficiency programs, recovery of lost electric margins, and performance incentive for March 2019 through December 2024, pursuant to the MEEIA, as approved by the MoPSC in December 2018.
Megawatthour or MWh – One thousand kilowatthours.
MGP – Manufactured gas plant.
MISO – Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., an RTO.
Missouri
Credit Agreement – Ameren’s and Ameren Missouri’s $1 billion senior unsecured credit agreement, which expires in December 2022, unless extended.
Missouri Environmental Authority – Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Authority of the state of Missouri, a governmental body authorized to finance environmental projects by issuing tax-exempt bonds and notes.
Missouri Senate Bill 564 – A 2018 Missouri law that resulted in certain changes to the regulation of Ameren Missouri’s electric service business. These changes include a reduction of customer rates to pass through the effect of the reduction in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate enacted under the TCJA and, at each electric utility's election, the use of PISA, among other things.
Mmbtu
– One million Btus.
Money pool – Borrowing agreements among Ameren and its subsidiaries to coordinate and provide for certain short-term cash and working capital requirements.
Moody’s – Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a credit rating agency.
MoOPC – Missouri Office of Public Counsel, a state agency.
MoPSC – Missouri Public Service Commission, a state agency that regulates Missouri utility businesses, including Ameren Missouri.
Native load – End-use retail customers whom we are obligated to serve by statute, franchise, contract, or other regulatory requirement.
Natural gas margins – Natural gas revenues less natural gas purchased for resale.
NAV – Net asset value per share.
NEIL – Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited, which includes all of its affiliated companies.
NERC – North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
Net
energy costs – Net energy costs, as defined in the FAC, which include fuel and purchased power costs, including transportation, net of off-system sales and capacity revenues. Substantially all transmission revenues and charges are excluded from net energy costs.
Net metering – Net metering allows customers who generate their own electricity or subscribe to receive output from eligible facilities to feed electricity they do not use back into the grid. The customers receive a credit for the energy they add to the grid.
New Madrid Smelter – A former aluminum smelter located in southeast Missouri.
NOx – Nitrogen oxides.
NPNS – Normal purchases
and normal sales.
NRC – Nuclear Regulatory Commission, a United States government agency.
NSPS – New Source Performance Standards, provisions under the Clean Air Act.
NSR – New Source Review provisions of the Clean Air Act, which include Nonattainment New Source Review and Prevention of Significant Deterioration regulations.
NWPA – Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended.
NYMEX – New York Mercantile Exchange.
NYSE – New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
OCI – Other comprehensive income (loss) as defined by GAAP.
Off-system
sales revenues – Revenues from other than native load sales, including wholesale sales.
PGA – Purchased Gas Adjustment tariffs, which permit prudently incurred natural gas costs to be recovered directly from utility customers without a traditional rate proceeding.
PISA – Plant-in-service accounting, an election under Missouri Senate Bill 564 that permits electric utilities to defer and recover 85% of the depreciation expense and a weighted-average cost of capital return on rate base on certain property, plant, and equipment placed in service after the PISA election date. The rate base on which the return is calculated incorporates qualifying capital expenditures since the PISA election date as well as changes in total accumulated depreciation excluding retirements and plant-related deferred income taxes. Accumulated
PISA deferrals earn carrying costs at the weighted-average cost of capital. PISA was elected by Ameren Missouri, effective September 1, 2018.
QIP – Qualifying infrastructure plant, which provides Ameren Illinois’ natural gas business with recovery of, and a weighted-average cost of capital return on, qualifying infrastructure plant investments that are placed in service between regulatory rate reviews.
Rate base – The basis on which a public utility is permitted to earn an allowed rate of return. This basis is the net investment in assets used to provide utility service, which generally consists of in-service property, plant, and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and accumulated deferred income taxes, inventories, and, depending on
jurisdiction, construction work in progress.
Regulatory lag – The exposure to differences in costs incurred and actual sales volume levels as compared with the associated amounts included in customer rates. Rate increase requests in traditional regulatory rate reviews can take up to 11 months to be acted upon by the MoPSC and the ICC. As a result, revenue increases authorized by regulators will lag behind changing costs and sales volume levels when based on historical periods.
RESRAM – Renewable energy standard rate adjustment mechanism, a cost recovery mechanism allowed under state law that enables Ameren Missouri to recover costs relating to compliance with Missouri's renewable energy standard, including recovery of investments in wind generation and other renewables, and earn a return on those investments not already provided for in
customer rates or any other recovery mechanism by adjusting customer rates on an annual basis without a traditional regulatory rate review, subject to MoPSC prudence reviews. RESRAM regulatory assets will earn carrying costs at short-term interest rates.
Revenue requirement – The cost of providing utility service to customers, which is calculated as the sum of a utility’s recoverable operating expenses and an allowed return on rate base, which includes a return on invested capital, both debt and equity, and an amount for income taxes.
RFP – Request for proposal.
RTO – Regional transmission organization.
S&P – S&P Global Ratings, a credit rating agency.
SEC
– Securities and Exchange Commission, a United States government agency.
SERC – SERC Reliability Corporation, one of the regional electric reliability councils organized for coordinating the planning and operation of the nation’s bulk power supply.
Smart Energy Plan – Ameren Missouri's plan to upgrade Missouri’s electric grid through 2023. Upgrades include investments to improve reliability and accommodate more renewable energy.
TCJA
– The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, federal income tax legislation enacted in December 2017, which significantly changed the tax laws applicable to business entities. The TCJA includes specific provisions related to regulated public utilities. Substantially all of the provisions of the TCJA affecting the Ameren Companies, other than certain transition depreciation rules, were effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017.
Test year – The selected period of time, typically a 12-month period, for which a utility’s historical or forecasted operating results are used to determine the appropriate revenue requirement.
VBA – A volume balancing adjustment for Ameren Illinois’ natural gas business. As a result of this adjustment, revenues from residential and small nonresidential
customers will increase or decrease as billing determinants differ from filed amounts. This adjustment ensures that changes in sales volumes, including deviations from normal weather conditions, do not result in an over- or under-collection of natural gas revenues for these rate classes.
Zero emission credit – A credit that represents the environmental attributes of one MWh of energy produced from certain zero emissions nuclear-powered generation facilities, which certain Illinois utilities are required to purchase pursuant to the FEJA.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Statements in this report not based on historical facts are considered “forward-looking” and, accordingly, involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed. Although such forward-looking statements have been made in good faith and are based on reasonable assumptions, there is no assurance that the expected results will be achieved. These statements include (without limitation) statements as to future expectations, beliefs, plans, strategies, objectives, events, conditions, and financial performance. In connection with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, we are providing this cautionary statement to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. The following factors, in addition to those discussed within Risk Factors under Part I, Item 1A,
of this report, and elsewhere in this report and in our other filings with the SEC, could cause actual results to differ materially from management expectations suggested in such forward-looking statements:
•
regulatory, judicial, or legislative actions, and any changes in regulatory policies and ratemaking determinations, such as those that may result from a potential change in the allowed base return on common equity under the MISO tariff from either the complaint case filed in February 2015 with the FERC or a new methodology proposed by the FERC in November 2018, Ameren Missouri’s requested certificate of convenience and necessity for a wind generation facility filed with the MoPSC in October 2018, Ameren Missouri’s natural gas regulatory rate review filed
with the MoPSC in December 2018, an appeal filed by the MoOPC in January 2019 in Ameren Missouri’s RESRAM case, and future regulatory, judicial, or legislative actions that change regulatory recovery mechanisms;
•
the effect of Ameren Illinois’ participation in performance-based formula ratemaking frameworks under the IEIMA and the FEJA, including the direct relationship between Ameren Illinois' return on common equity and the 30-year United States Treasury bond yields, and the related financial commitments;
•
the effect
of Missouri Senate Bill 564 on Ameren Missouri, including as a result of Ameren Missouri’s election to use PISA and the resulting customer rate caps;
•
the effects of changes in federal, state, or local laws and other governmental actions, including monetary, fiscal, and energy policies;
•
the effects of changes in federal, state, or local tax laws, regulations, interpretations, or rates, amendments or technical corrections to the TCJA, and challenges to the tax positions taken by the Ameren Companies, if any;
•
the
effects on demand for our services resulting from technological advances, including advances in customer energy efficiency, energy storage, and private generation sources, which generate electricity at the site of consumption and are becoming more cost-competitive;
•
the effectiveness of Ameren Missouri’s customer energy-efficiency programs and the related revenues and performance incentives earned under its MEEIA programs;
•
Ameren Illinois’ ability to achieve the FEJA electric customer energy-efficiency goals and the
resulting impact on its allowed return on program investments;
•
our ability to align overall spending, both operating and capital, with frameworks established by our regulators and to recover these costs in a timely manner in our attempt to earn our allowed returns on equity;
•
the cost and availability of fuel, such as ultra-low-sulfur coal, natural gas, and enriched uranium, used to produce electricity; the cost and availability of purchased power, zero emission credits, renewable energy credits, and natural gas for
distribution; and the level and volatility of future market prices for such commodities and credits, including our ability to recover the costs for such commodities and credits and our customers’ tolerance for any related price increases;
•
disruptions in the delivery of fuel, failure of our fuel suppliers to provide adequate quantities or quality of fuel, or lack of adequate inventories of fuel, including nuclear fuel assemblies from the one NRC-licensed supplier of Ameren Missouri's Callaway energy center’s assemblies;
•
the
cost and availability of transmission capacity for the energy generated by Ameren Missouri's energy centers or required to satisfy Ameren Missouri’s energy sales;
•
the effectiveness of our risk management strategies and our use of financial and derivative instruments;
the
ability to obtain sufficient insurance, including insurance for Ameren Missouri’s Callaway energy center, or, in the absence of insurance, the ability to recover uninsured losses from our customers;
•
the impact of cyberattacks on us or our suppliers, which could, among other things, result in the loss of operational control of energy centers and electric and natural gas transmission and distribution systems and/or the loss of data, such as customer, employee, financial, and operating system information;
•
business and
economic conditions, including their impact on interest rates, collection of our receivable balances, and demand for our products;
•
disruptions of the capital markets, deterioration in credit metrics of the Ameren Companies, including as a result of the implementation of the TCJA, or other events that may have an adverse effect on the cost or availability of capital, including short-term credit and liquidity;
•
the actions of credit rating agencies and the effects of such actions;
•
the
inability of our counterparties to meet their obligations with respect to contracts, credit agreements, and financial instruments;
•
the impact of weather conditions and other natural phenomena on us and our customers, including the impact of system outages;
•
the construction, installation, performance, and cost recovery of generation, transmission, and distribution assets;
•
the
effects of breakdowns or failures of equipment in the operation of natural gas transmission and distribution systems and storage facilities, such as leaks, explosions, and mechanical problems, and compliance with natural gas safety regulations;
•
the effects of breakdowns or failures of electric generation, transmission, or distribution equipment or facilities, which could result in unanticipated liabilities or unplanned outages;
•
the operation of Ameren Missouri’s Callaway energy center, including planned and unplanned
outages, and decommissioning costs;
•
the impact of current environmental laws and new, more stringent, or changing requirements, including those related to CO2 and the proposed repeal and replacement of the Clean Power Plan and potential adoption and implementation of the Affordable Clean Energy Rule, other emissions and discharges, cooling water intake structures, CCR, and energy efficiency, that could limit or terminate the operation of certain of Ameren Missouri’s energy centers, increase our operating costs or investment requirements, result in an impairment of our assets, cause us to sell our assets, reduce our customers’ demand for electricity or natural gas, or otherwise
have a negative financial effect;
•
the impact of complying with renewable energy requirements in Missouri and Illinois and with the zero emission standard in Illinois;
•
Ameren Missouri’s ability to acquire wind and other renewable generation facilities and recover its cost of investment and related return in a timely manner, which is affected by the ability to obtain all necessary project approvals; the availability of federal production and investment tax credits related to renewable energy and Ameren Missouri’s ability
to use such credits; the cost of wind and solar generation technologies; and Ameren Missouri’s ability to obtain timely interconnection agreements with MISO or other RTOs, including the costs of such interconnections;
•
labor disputes, work force reductions, changes in future wage and employee benefits costs, including those resulting from changes in discount rates, mortality tables, returns on benefit plan assets, and other assumptions;
•
the impact of negative opinions of us or our utility services that our customers,
legislators, or regulators may have or develop, which could result from a variety of factors, including failures in system reliability, failure to implement our investment plans or to protect sensitive customer information, increases in rates, or negative media coverage;
•
the impact of adopting new accounting guidance;
•
the effects of strategic initiatives, including mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures;
•
legal
and administrative proceedings; and
•
acts of sabotage, war, terrorism, or other intentionally disruptive acts.
New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all of such factors, nor can it assess the impact of each such factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained or implied in any forward-looking statement. Given these uncertainties, undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements. Except to the extent required by the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking
statements to reflect new information or future events.
PART I
ITEM 1.
BUSINESS
GENERAL
Ameren, formed in 1997 and headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, is a public utility holding company whose primary assets are its equity interests in its subsidiaries. Ameren’s subsidiaries are separate, independent
legal entities with separate businesses, assets, and liabilities. Dividends on Ameren’s common stock and the payment of expenses by Ameren depend on distributions made to it by its subsidiaries.
Below is a summary description of Ameren’s principal subsidiaries, which includes Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois, and ATXI. Ameren also has other subsidiaries that conduct other activities, such as providing shared services. A more detailed description can be found in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
Ameren
Missouri operates a rate-regulated electric generation, transmission, and distribution business and a rate-regulated natural gas distribution business in Missouri.
•
Ameren Illinois operates rate-regulated electric transmission, electric distribution, and natural gas distribution businesses in Illinois.
•
ATXI operates a FERC rate-regulated electric transmission business. ATXI is constructing MISO-approved electric transmission
projects, including the Illinois Rivers and Mark Twain projects, and operates the Spoon River project, which was placed in service in February 2018. Ameren also evaluates competitive electric transmission investment opportunities as they arise.
The following table presents our total employees at December 31, 2018:
Ameren Missouri
3,798
Ameren Illinois
3,458
Ameren
Services
1,582
Ameren
8,838
Labor unions at Ameren’s subsidiaries consist of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the International Union of Operating Engineers, the Laborer’s International Union of North America, the United Association of Plumbers and Pipefitters, and the United Government Security Officers of America. At December 31, 2018, these labor unions collectively represented about 51% of Ameren’s
total employees. They represented 61% and 57% of the employees at Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois, respectively. The collective bargaining agreements expire between 2019 and 2021.
For additional information about the development of our businesses, our business operations, and factors affecting our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Part II, Item 7, of this report and Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
BUSINESS SEGMENTS
Ameren has four segments: Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Transmission. The Ameren Missouri segment includes
all of the operations of Ameren Missouri. Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution consists of the electric distribution business of Ameren Illinois. Ameren Illinois Natural Gas consists of the natural gas business of Ameren Illinois. Ameren Transmission primarily consists of the aggregated electric transmission businesses of Ameren Illinois and ATXI.
Ameren Missouri has one segment. Ameren Illinois has three segments: Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Illinois Transmission.
An illustration of the Ameren Companies’ reporting structures is provided below.
The Ameren Transmission segment also includes allocated Ameren (parent) interest charges, Ameren Transmission Company, LLC, ATX East, LLC, and ATX Southwest, LLC.
RATES AND REGULATION
Rates
The rates that Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois, and ATXI are allowed to charge for their utility services significantly influence the results
of operations, financial position, and liquidity of these companies and Ameren. The electric and natural gas utility industry is highly regulated. The utility rates charged to customers are determined by governmental entities, including the MoPSC, the ICC, and the FERC. Decisions by these entities are influenced by many factors, including the cost of providing service, the prudency of expenditures, the quality of service, regulatory staff knowledge and experience, customer intervention, and economic conditions, as well as social and political views. Decisions made by these governmental entities regarding rates are largely outside of our control. These decisions, as well as the regulatory lag involved in the process of getting new rates approved, could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial position, and liquidity of the Ameren Companies. The extent of the regulatory lag varies for each of Ameren’s
electric and natural gas jurisdictions, with the Ameren Transmission and Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution businesses experiencing the least amount of regulatory lag. Depending on the jurisdiction, the effects of regulatory lag are mitigated by various means, including the use of a future test year, the use of trackers and riders, the level and timing of expenditures, annual revenue requirement reconciliations, the decoupling of revenues from sales volumes, and the recovery of certain capital investments under PISA, the RESRAM, and the QIP rider.
The MoPSC regulates rates and other matters for Ameren Missouri. The ICC regulates rates and other matters for Ameren Illinois. The MoPSC and the ICC regulate non-rate utility matters for ATXI. ATXI does not have retail distribution customers; therefore, the MoPSC and the ICC do not have authority to regulate ATXI’s rates. The FERC regulates Ameren Missouri’s, Ameren Illinois’,
and ATXI’s cost-based rates for the wholesale transmission and distribution of energy in interstate commerce and various other matters discussed below under General Regulatory Matters.
The following table summarizes the key terms of the rate orders in effect for customer billings for each of Ameren’s rate-regulated utilities as of January 1, 2019:
Rate
Regulator
Allowed Return on Equity
Percent of
Common Equity
Rate Base
(in billions)
Portion of Ameren’s 2018 Operating Revenues(a)
Ameren Missouri
Electric
service(b)
MoPSC
9.2% – 9.7%(c)
(c)
(c)
54%
Natural gas delivery service
MoPSC
(d)
(d)
(d)
2%
Ameren
Illinois
Electric distribution delivery service(e)
ICC
8.69%
50.0%
$3.0
25%
Natural gas delivery service(f)
ICC
9.87%
50.0%
$1.6
13%
Electric
transmission service(g)
FERC
10.82%
52.0%
$1.9
3%
ATXI
Electric transmission service(g)
FERC
10.82%
56.1%
$1.3
3%
(a)
Includes
pass-through costs recovered from customers, such as purchased power for electric distribution delivery service and natural gas purchased for resale for natural gas delivery service, and intercompany eliminations.
(b)
Ameren Missouri’s electric generation, transmission, and delivery service rates are bundled together and charged to retail customers under a combined electric service rate.
(c)
Based on the MoPSC’s March 2017 rate order. This rate order specified that an implicit return on equity was within a range of
9.2% to 9.7%. The rate order did not specify a percent of common equity or rate base. The return on equity used for allowance for equity funds used during construction is 9.53%.
(d)
Based on the MoPSC’s January 2011 rate order. This rate order did not specify the allowed return on equity, the percent of common equity, or rate base.
(e)
Based on the ICC’s November 2018 rate order. Ameren Illinois electric distribution delivery service rates are updated annually and become effective each January. The November 2018 rate
order was based on 2017 recoverable costs, expected net plant additions for 2018, and the annual average of the monthly yields during 2017 of the 30-year United States Treasury bonds plus 580 basis points. Ameren Illinois’ 2019 electric distribution delivery service revenues will be based on its 2019 actual recoverable costs, rate base, common equity percentage, and return on common equity, as calculated under the IEIMA’s performance-based formula ratemaking framework.
(f)
Based on the ICC’s November 2018 rate order. The rate order was based on a 2019 future test year.
(g)
Transmission
rates are updated annually and become effective each January. They are determined by a company-specific, forward-looking formula ratemaking based on each year’s forecasted information. The 10.82% return, which includes a 50 basis points incentive adder for participation in an RTO, could be lowered as a result of a FERC complaint proceeding filed in February 2015 that challenged the allowed return on common equity for MISO transmission owners and will require customer refunds if the FERC approves a return on equity lower than that previously collected through rates. The return on equity applicable to investments in ATXI’s Mark Twain project includes an additional 50 basis points incentive adder related to the unique nature of risks involved in completing the project.
Ameren Missouri
Ameren Missouri’s electric operating revenues are regulated by the MoPSC. Ameren
Missouri’s electric service and natural gas distribution service rates are established in a traditional regulatory rate review based on a historical test year and an allowed return on equity. If specific criteria are met, certain of Ameren Missouri’s electric rates may be adjusted without a traditional rate proceeding. For example, Ameren Missouri’s MEEIA customer energy-efficiency program costs, lost electric margins, and any performance incentive are recoverable through a rider that may be adjusted without a traditional rate proceeding, subject to MoPSC prudence reviews. Likewise, the FAC permits Ameren Missouri to recover or refund, through customer rates, 95% of the variance in net energy costs from the amount set in base rates without a traditional rate proceeding, subject to MoPSC prudence reviews.
In addition to the MEEIA and the FAC recovery mechanisms, Ameren Missouri employs other cost recovery mechanisms, including
a pension and postretirement benefit cost tracker, an uncertain tax position tracker, a tracker on certain excess deferred taxes, a renewable energy standards cost tracker, and a solar rebate program tracker. Each of these trackers allows Ameren Missouri to defer the difference between actual costs incurred and the costs included in customer rates as a regulatory asset or regulatory liability. The difference will be included in base rates in a subsequent MoPSC rate order. Ameren Missouri also employs PISA and the RESRAM, as discussed below.
Under PISA, Ameren Missouri is permitted to defer and recover 85% of the depreciation expense and a weighted-average cost of capital return on rate base on certain property, plant, and equipment placed in service after September 1, 2018, and not included in base rates. Eligible PISA deferrals exclude amounts related
to new coal-fired, nuclear, and natural gas generating units and service to new customer premises. Accumulated PISA deferrals earn carrying costs at the weighted-average cost of capital, and all approved PISA deferrals will be added to rate base prospectively and recovered over a period of 20 years following a regulatory rate review. PISA mitigates the impacts of regulatory lag between regulatory rate reviews. Costs not included in the PISA deferral, including the remaining 15% of certain property, plant, and equipment not eligible for recovery under the RESRAM, remain subject to regulatory lag. As a result of the PISA election, additional provisions under Missouri Senate Bill 564 apply to Ameren Missouri, including limitations on electric customer rate increases and an electric base rate freeze until April 2020. Customer rates under the MEEIA, the FAC, and the RESRAM riders have not been frozen. If rate changes from the FAC or the RESRAM riders
would cause rates to temporarily exceed the 2.85% rate cap, the overage would be deferred for future recovery in the next regulatory rate review; however, rates established in such regulatory rate review will be subject to the rate cap. Any deferred overages approved for recovery will be recovered in a manner consistent with costs recovered under PISA. Excluding customer rates under the MEEIA rider, which are not subject to the rate cap, Ameren Missouri would incur a penalty equal to the amount of deferred
overage that would cause customer rates to exceed the 2.85% rate cap. Both the rate increase limitation and PISA are effective
through December 2023, unless Ameren Missouri requests and receives MoPSC approval of an extension through December 2028.
The RESRAM allows Ameren Missouri to mitigate the impacts of regulatory lag for the cost of compliance with renewable energy requirements, including recovery of investments in wind and other renewable generation, and to earn a return on those investments not already provided for in customer rates or any other recovery mechanism by adjusting customer rates on an annual basis without a traditional regulatory rate review. Under the RESRAM, Ameren Missouri is permitted to recover the 15% of renewable generation plant placed in service not recovered under PISA. RESRAM regulatory assets earn carrying costs at short-term interest rates.
Ameren Missouri is a member of MISO, and its transmission rate is calculated in accordance
with the MISO Open Access Transmission Tariff. The FERC regulates the rates charged and the terms and conditions for wholesale electric transmission service. The transmission rate update each June is based on Ameren Missouri’s filings with the FERC. This rate is not directly charged to Missouri retail customers because, in Missouri, bundled retail rates include an amount for transmission-related costs and revenues.
Ameren Missouri’s natural gas operating revenues are regulated by the MoPSC. If specific criteria are met, Ameren Missouri’s natural gas rates may be adjusted without a traditional rate proceeding. PGA clauses permit prudently incurred natural gas supply costs to be passed directly to customers. The ISRS also permits certain prudently incurred natural gas infrastructure replacement costs to be recovered from customers on a timely basis between regulatory rate reviews. Ameren Missouri is not currently recovering any
infrastructure replacement costs under the ISRS. The return on equity for purposes of the ISRS tariff will be determined in the pending natural gas rate review. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of this report for more information on the pending natural gas rate review.
Ameren Illinois
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution
Ameren Illinois’ electric distribution delivery service operating revenues are regulated by the ICC. In 2018, Ameren Illinois’ electric distribution delivery service revenues accounted for 88% of Ameren Illinois’ total electric operating revenues.
Ameren Illinois participates in the performance-based formula ratemaking framework established pursuant to the IEIMA, which is available through 2022 unless
extended. This framework provides for the recovery of actual costs of electric delivery service that are prudently incurred and the use of the utility’s actual regulated capital structure through a formula for calculating the return on equity component of the cost of capital. A common equity ratio up to and including 50% is considered prudent under the framework. The return on equity component of the formula rate is equal to the annual average of the monthly yields of the 30-year United States Treasury bonds plus 580 basis points. The revenue requirement included in customer rates is reconciled annually with the revenue requirement necessary to reflect the actual costs incurred in a given year, including an allowed return on equity. This annual revenue requirement reconciliation adjustment will be collected from, or refunded to, customers within two years.
Beginning in 2017, the FEJA allowed Ameren Illinois to recover within
the following two years its electric distribution revenue requirement for a given year, independent of actual sales volumes. Prior to 2017, Ameren Illinois’ revenues were affected by the timing of sales volumes due to seasonal rates and changes in volumes resulting from, among other things, weather and energy efficiency. This portion of the law extends beyond the end of formula ratemaking in 2022. Through 2022, revenue differences will be included in the annual formula rate revenue requirement reconciliation. Additionally, this law implemented a customer surcharge, based on zero emission credit purchases, relating to certain nuclear energy centers located in Illinois. The surcharge, like the cost of power purchased by Ameren Illinois on behalf of its customers, is passed through to electric distribution customers with no effect on Ameren Illinois’ earnings.
Ameren Illinois plans to invest approximately $100 million per year
in electric energy-efficiency programs through 2023, consistent with targets established by the FEJA. The electric energy-efficiency program investments and the formulaic return on those investments will be collected from customers through a rider; they will not be included in the IEIMA formula ratemaking framework.
Ameren Illinois is also subject to performance standards. Failure to achieve the standards would result in a reduction in the company’s allowed return on equity calculated under the formulas. The performance standards applicable to electric distribution service include improvements in service reliability to reduce both the frequency and duration of outages, a reduction in the number of estimated bills, a reduction of consumption from inactive meters, and a reduction in bad debt expense. The electric distribution service regulatory framework provides for return on equity
penalties up to 38 basis points in each year from 2019 through 2022, if these performance standards are not met. Beginning in 2018, the rider for electric energy-efficiency investments provides for increases or decreases of up to 200 basis points to the return on equity. Any adjustments to the return on equity for energy-efficiency investments will depend on annual performance of a historical period relative to energy savings goals. In 2018, there were no performance-related basis point adjustments.
Under the IEIMA, Ameren Illinois is also subject to minimum capital spending levels. Between 2012 and 2021, Ameren Illinois is required
to invest a minimum of $625 million in capital projects to modernize its distribution system incremental to its average annual electric distribution service capital projects of $228 million for calendar years 2008 through 2010. Through 2018, Ameren Illinois has invested $592 million in IEIMA capital projects toward its $625 million requirement.
Ameren Illinois employs cost recovery mechanisms for power procurement, renewable energy credits, zero emission credits, and certain environmental costs, as well as bad debt expense and the costs of certain asbestos-related claims not recovered in base rates.
Ameren Illinois Natural Gas
Ameren Illinois’ natural gas operating revenues are regulated by the ICC. In November 2018, the ICC issued a rate order that approved an annual revenue increase of $32 million for Ameren Illinois’ natural gas delivery
service, based on a 2019 future test year. If specific criteria are met, Ameren Illinois’ natural gas rates may be adjusted without a traditional rate proceeding, as PGA clauses permit prudently incurred natural gas costs to be passed directly to customers. Ameren Illinois employs a VBA to ensure recoverability of the natural gas distribution service revenue requirement for residential and small nonresidential customers that is dependent on sales volumes. For these rate classes, the VBA allows Ameren Illinois to adjust natural gas distribution service rates without a traditional regulatory rate review when changes occur in sales volumes from normalized sales volumes approved by the ICC in a previous regulatory rate review. Also, Ameren Illinois employs cost recovery mechanisms for customer energy-efficiency program costs, certain environmental costs, and bad debt expenses not recovered in base rates.
Illinois
has a law that encourages natural gas utilities to accelerate modernization of the state’s natural gas infrastructure through a QIP rider. Without legislative action, the QIP rider will expire in December 2023. Ameren Illinois’ QIP rider allows a surcharge to be added to customers’ bills to recover depreciation expenses and to earn a return on qualifying natural gas investments that were not previously included in base rates. Eligible natural gas investments include projects to improve safety and reliability and modernization investments, such as smart meters. Recovery begins two months after the qualifying natural gas plant is placed in service and continues until such plant is included in base rates in a natural gas delivery service rate order. Ameren Illinois’ QIP rider is subject to a rate impact limitation of a cumulative 4% per year since the most recent delivery service rate order, with no single year exceeding 5.5%. Upon issuance of a natural gas delivery service
rate order, QIP rate base is transferred to base rates and the QIP rider is reset to zero, which mitigates the risk that the QIP rider will exceed its statutory limitations in future years and ensures timely recovery of capital investment.
Ameren Illinois Transmission
Ameren Illinois’ transmission operating revenues are regulated by the FERC. In 2018, Ameren Illinois’ transmission operating revenues accounted for 12% of Ameren Illinois’ electric operating revenues. See Ameren Transmission below for additional information regarding Ameren Illinois’ transmission business.
Ameren Transmission
Ameren Transmission primarily consists of the aggregated electric transmission businesses of Ameren Illinois and ATXI. Both Ameren Illinois and ATXI are members of MISO, and their transmission rates are calculated
in accordance with the MISO Open Access Transmission Tariff. Ameren Illinois and ATXI have received FERC approval to use a company-specific, forward-looking formula ratemaking framework in setting their transmission rates. These forward-looking rates are updated annually and become effective each January with forecasted information. A reconciliation at the end of the year, which adjusts for the actual revenue requirement and for actual sales volumes, is used to adjust billing rates in a subsequent year. Ameren Illinois Transmission earns revenue from transmission service provided to Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, other retail electric suppliers, and wholesale customers. The transmission expense for Illinois customers who have elected to purchase their power from Ameren Illinois is recovered through a cost recovery mechanism with no net effect on Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution earnings, as costs are offset by corresponding revenues.
Transmission revenues from these transactions are reflected in Ameren Transmission’s and Ameren Illinois Transmission’s operating revenues.
The FERC-allowed return on common equity for MISO transmission owners was challenged by customer groups in two complaint cases filed in November 2013 and February 2015. In September 2016, the FERC issued a final order in the November 2013 complaint case, which became immediately effective, and lowered the allowed base return on common equity to 10.32%, or a 10.82% total allowed return on equity with the inclusion of a 50 basis point adder for participation in an RTO. In June 2016, an administrative law judge issued an initial decision in the February 2015 complaint case. If approved by the FERC, it would lower the allowed base return on common equity for the 15-month period of February 2015 to May 2016 to 9.70%, or a 10.20% total allowed return
on equity with the inclusion of a 50 basis point incentive adder for participation in an RTO. It would also require customer refunds, with interest, for that 15-month period. A final FERC order would also establish the allowed return on common equity that will apply prospectively from the effective date of such order, replacing the current 10.82% total return on common equity. In November 2018, the FERC issued an order related to the February 2015 complaint case and the September 2016 final order, which required briefs from the participants to be filed in February 2019 regarding a new methodology for determining the base return on common equity and whether and how to apply the new methodology to the two MISO complaint cases.
Ameren is unable to predict the ultimate impact of the proposed methodology on these complaint cases at this time. As the FERC is under no deadline to issue a final order, the timing of the issuance of the final order in the February 2015 complaint case, or any potential impact to the amounts refunded as a result of the September 2016 final order, is uncertain.
ATXI has three MISO-approved multi-value projects: the Spoon River, Illinois Rivers, and Mark Twain projects. The Spoon River project, which is located in northwest Illinois, was placed in service in February 2018. The Illinois Rivers project involves the construction of a 345-kilovolt line from eastern Missouri across Illinois to western Indiana. Construction of the Illinois Rivers project is substantially complete, with the last section awaiting the outcome of certain
legal proceedings, which will delay the expected completion date to 2020. This delay is not expected to materially affect 2019 rate base or earnings. The Mark Twain project is located in northeast Missouri and connects Iowa to the Illinois Rivers project. ATXI plans to complete the Mark Twain project by the end of 2019. As of December 31, 2018, ATXI’s expected remaining investment in both the Illinois Rivers and Mark Twain projects was approximately $150 million, with the total investment in all three projects expected to be more than $1.6 billion.
The FERC has approved transmission rate incentives relating to the three MISO-approved multi-value projects, which allow construction work in progress to be included in rate base, thereby improving the timeliness of cash recovery. Additionally, the Mark Twain project earns an additional
50 basis point return on equity incentive adder, effective as of February 14, 2018, based on the unique nature of risks involved in the project.
For additional information on Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois, and ATXI rate matters, including the FERC complaint case challenging the allowed return on common equity for MISO transmission owners, see Results of Operations and Outlook in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Part II, Item 7, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk under Part II, Item 7A, and Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
General Regulatory Matters
Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois, and ATXI must receive FERC approval to enter into various transactions, such as issuing
short-term debt securities and conducting certain acquisitions, mergers, and consolidations involving electric utility holding companies. In addition, Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois, and ATXI must receive authorization from the applicable state public utility regulatory agency to issue stock and long-term debt securities and to conduct mergers, affiliate transactions, and various other activities.
Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois, and ATXI are also subject to mandatory reliability standards, including cybersecurity standards adopted by the FERC, to ensure the reliability of the bulk electric power system. These standards are developed and enforced by the NERC, pursuant to authority delegated to it by the FERC. Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois, and ATXI are members of the SERC. The SERC is one of eight regional entities representing all or portions of 16 central and southeastern states under authority from the NERC for the
purpose of implementing and enforcing reliability standards approved by the FERC. The regional entities of the NERC work to safeguard the reliability of the bulk power systems throughout North America. If any of Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois, or ATXI is found not to be in compliance with these mandatory reliability standards, it could incur substantial monetary penalties and other sanctions.
Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005, the FERC and any state public utility regulatory agency may access books and records of Ameren and its subsidiaries that are found to be relevant to costs incurred by Ameren’s rate-regulated subsidiaries that may affect jurisdictional rates. The act also permits the MoPSC and the ICC to request that the FERC review cost allocations by Ameren Services to other Ameren companies.
Operation of Ameren Missouri’s Callaway energy center is subject
to regulation by the NRC. The license for the Callaway energy center expires in 2044. Ameren Missouri’s Osage hydroelectric energy center and Taum Sauk pumped-storage hydroelectric energy center, as licensed projects under the Federal Power Act, are subject to FERC regulations affecting, among other aspects, the general operation and maintenance of the projects. The licenses for the Osage hydroelectric energy center and the Taum Sauk pumped-storage hydroelectric energy center expire in 2047 and 2044, respectively. Ameren Missouri’s Keokuk energy center and its dam in the Mississippi River between Hamilton, Illinois, and Keokuk, Iowa, are operated under authority granted by an Act of Congress in 1905.
For additional information on regulatory matters, see Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters, Note 9 – Callaway Energy Center, and Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
Environmental
Matters
Certain of our operations are subject to federal, state, and local environmental laws, including statutes and regulations, relating to the protection of the safety and health of our personnel, the public, and the environment. These laws include requirements relating to identification, generation, storage, handling, transportation, disposal, recordkeeping, labeling, reporting, and emergency response in connection with hazardous and toxic materials; safety and health standards; and environmental protection requirements, including standards and limitations relating to the discharge of air and water pollutants, water intake, and the management of waste and byproduct materials.
Failure
to comply with these laws could have material adverse effects on us. We could be subject to criminal or civil penalties by regulatory agencies, or we could be ordered by the courts to pay private parties. Except as indicated in this report, we believe that we are in material compliance with existing laws that currently apply to our operations.
The EPA has promulgated environmental regulations that have a significant impact on the electric utility industry. Over time, compliance with these regulations could be costly for Ameren Missouri, which operates coal-fired power plants. As of December 31, 2018, Ameren Missouri’s fossil fuel-fired energy centers represented 16% and 32% of Ameren’s and Ameren Missouri’s rate base, respectively. Regulations that apply to air emissions from the electric
utility industry include the NSPS, the CSAPR, the MATS, and the National Ambient Air Quality Standards, which are subject to periodic review for certain pollutants. Collectively, these regulations cover a variety of pollutants, such as SO2, particulate matter, NOx,mercury, toxic metals, and acid gases, and CO2 emissions from new power plants. Water intake and discharges from power plants are regulated under the Clean Water Act. Such regulation could require modifications to water intake structures or more stringent limitations on wastewater discharges at Ameren Missouri’s energy centers, either of which could result in significant capital expenditures. The management and disposal of coal ash is regulated
under the CCR rule, which will require the closure of surface impoundments and the installations of dry ash handling systems at several of Ameren Missouri’s energy centers. The individual or combined effects of existing environmental regulations could result in significant capital expenditures, increased operating costs, or the closure or alteration of operations at some of Ameren Missouri’s energy centers. Ameren and Ameren Missouri expect that such compliance costs would be recoverable through rates, subject to MoPSC prudence review, but the timing of costs and their recovery could be subject to regulatory lag. These environmental regulations could also affect the availability of, the cost of, and the demand for power and natural gas that is acquired for Ameren Missouri’s natural gas customers and Ameren Illinois’ electric and natural gas customers. Federal, state, and local authorities continually
revise these regulations, which adds uncertainty to our planning process and to the ultimate implementation of these or other new or revised regulations.
For additional discussion of environmental matters, including NOx and SO2 emission reduction requirements, regulation of CO2 emissions, wastewater discharge standards, remediation efforts, CCR management regulations, and a discussion of the EPA’s allegations of violations of the Clean Air Act and Missouri law in connection with projects at Ameren Missouri’s Rush Island energy center, see Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
TRANSMISSION
Ameren
owns an integrated transmission system that is composed of the transmission assets of Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois, and ATXI. Ameren also operates two balancing authority areas: AMMO and AMIL. During 2018, the peak demand was 7,482 megawatts in AMMO and 8,792 megawatts in AMIL. The Ameren transmission system directly connects with 15 other balancing authority areas for the exchange of electric energy.
Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois, and ATXI are transmission-owning members of MISO. Ameren Missouri is authorized by the MoPSC to participate in MISO through May 2020. Ameren Missouri is required to file a periodic cost-benefit study with the MoPSC in 2020 evaluating Ameren Missouri’s continued participation in MISO.
SUPPLY OF ELECTRIC POWER
Ameren Missouri
Ameren
Missouri’s electric supply is primarily generated from its energy centers. Factors that could cause Ameren Missouri to purchase power include, among other things, energy center outages, the fulfillment of renewable energy requirements, the failure of suppliers to meet their power supply obligations, extreme weather conditions, the availability of power at a cost lower than its generation cost, and the absence of sufficient owned generation.
Ameren Missouri files a nonbinding 20-year integrated resource plan with the MoPSC every three years. The most recent integrated resource plan, filed in September 2017, includes Ameren Missouri’s preferred approach for meeting customers’ projected long-term energy needs in a cost-effective manner while maintaining system reliability. The plan targets cleaner and more diverse sources of energy generation, including solar, wind, natural gas, hydro, and nuclear power.
It also includes expanding renewable generation by adding at least 700 megawatts of wind generation by 2020 in Missouri and neighboring states, adding 100 megawatts of solar generation by 2027, retiring coal-fired energy centers as they reach the end of their useful lives, expanding customer energy-efficiency programs, and adding cost-effective demand response programs.
Ameren Missouri continues to evaluate its longer-term needs for new generating capacity. The need for new energy centers is dependent on several key factors, including continuation of and customer participation in energy-efficiency programs, the amount of distributed generation from customers, load growth, technological advancements, costs of generation alternatives, environmental regulation of coal-fired power plants, and state renewable energy requirements, which could lead to the retirement of current baseload assets before the end of their useful lives or
alterations in the way those assets operate. Because of the significant time required to plan, acquire permits for,
and build a baseload energy center, Ameren Missouri continues to study alternatives and to take steps to preserve options to meet future demand. Steps include evaluating the potential for further diversification of Ameren Missouri’s generation portfolio through renewable energy generation, including wind and solar generation, additional customer energy-efficiency and demand response programs, distributed energy resources, and energy storage.
Ameren Illinois
In
Illinois, while electric transmission and distribution service rates are regulated, power supply prices are not. Although electric customers are allowed to purchase power from an alternative retail electric supplier, Ameren Illinois is required to be the provider of last resort for its electric distribution customers. In 2018, 2017, and 2016, Ameren Illinois procured power on behalf of its customers for 23% in each year of its total kilowatthour sales. Power purchased by Ameren Illinois for its electric distribution customers who do not elect to purchase their power from an alternative retail electric supplier comes either through procurement processes conducted by the IPA or through markets operated by MISO. The IPA administers an RFP process through which Ameren Illinois procures its expected supply. The power and related procurement costs incurred by Ameren Illinois are passed directly to its electric distribution customers through a cost recovery mechanism. The costs
are reflected in Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution’s results of operations, but do not affect Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution’s earnings, because these costs are offset by corresponding revenues. Ameren Illinois charges transmission and distribution service rates to electric distribution customers who purchase electricity from alternative retail electric suppliers, which does affect Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution’s earnings.
Illinois law requires Ameren Illinois to offer rebates for certain net metering customers. It is anticipated that the first rebates will be issued in 2019. The cost of the rebates will be deferred as a regulatory asset, which will earn a return based on the utility’s weighted-average cost of capital. Customers that receive these rebates will be allowed to net their supply service charges, but not their distribution service charges. Beginning in 2017, the FEJA decoupled the electric distribution
revenues established in a rate proceeding from the actual sales volumes, which ensures that Ameren Illinois’ electric distribution earnings will not be affected by any changes in sales volumes.
POWER GENERATION
Ameren Missouri owns energy centers that rely on a diverse fuel portfolio, including coal, nuclear, and natural gas, as well as renewable sources of generation, which include hydroelectric, methane gas, and solar. All of Ameren Missouri’s coal-fired energy centers were constructed prior to 1978. The Callaway nuclear energy center began operation in 1984 and is licensed to operate until 2044. As of December 31, 2018, Ameren Missouri’s fossil fuel-fired energy centers represented 16% and 32% of Ameren’s and Ameren Missouri’s rate
base, respectively. See Item 2 – Properties under Part I of this report for information regarding Ameren Missouri’s electric generation energy centers.
Coal
Ameren Missouri has an ongoing need for coal as fuel for generation, and pursues a price-hedging strategy consistent with this requirement. Ameren Missouri has agreements in place to purchase and transport coal to its energy centers. As of December 31, 2018, Ameren Missouri had price-hedged 98% of its expected coal supply and 100% of its coal transportation requirements for generation in 2019. Ameren Missouri has additional coal supply under contract through 2022. The Powder River Basin coal transport agreements that Ameren
Missouri has with Union Pacific Railroad and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway are currently set to expire at the end of 2024. Ameren Missouri burned approximately 18.0 million tons of coal in 2018.
About 97% of Ameren Missouri’s coal is purchased from the Powder River Basin in Wyoming. The remaining coal is typically purchased from the Illinois Basin. Inventories may be adjusted because of generation levels or uncertainties of supply due to potential work stoppages, delays in coal deliveries, equipment breakdowns, and other factors. Deliveries from the Powder River Basin have occasionally been restricted because of rail congestion and maintenance, derailments, and weather. As of December 31, 2018, coal inventories for Ameren Missouri were near targeted levels. Disruptions in coal deliveries could cause Ameren Missouri to pursue
a strategy that could include reducing wholesale sales of power during low-margin periods, buying higher-cost fuels to generate required electricity, and purchasing power from other sources.
Nuclear
The production of nuclear fuel involves the mining and milling of uranium ore to produce uranium concentrates, the conversion of uranium concentrates to uranium hexafluoride gas, the enrichment of that gas, the conversion of the enriched uranium hexafluoride gas into uranium dioxide fuel pellets, and the fabrication into fuel assemblies. Ameren Missouri has entered into uranium, uranium conversion, uranium enrichment, and fabrication contracts to procure the fuel supply for its Callaway energy center.
The Callaway energy center requires refueling at 18-month intervals. The last refueling was completed in December 2017. The next refueling is scheduled
for the spring of 2019. As of December 31, 2018, Ameren Missouri had inventories for all of Callaway’s spring 2019
refueling requirements. Ameren Missouri has inventories and supply contracts sufficient to meet all of its uranium (concentrate and hexafluoride), conversion, and enrichment requirements at least through the 2023 refueling. Ameren Missouri has fuel fabrication service contracts through the 2023 refueling.
RENEWABLE ENERGY CREDITS
AND ZERO EMISSION CREDITS
Missouri and Illinois laws require electric utilities to include renewable energy resources in their portfolios. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois satisfied their renewable energy portfolio requirements in 2018.
In Missouri, utilities were required to purchase or generate electricity equal to at least 10% of native load sales from renewable energy sources in 2018. That percentage will increase to at least 15% by 2021, subject to an average 1% annual increase on customer rates over any 10-year period. At least 2% of the annual renewable energy requirement must be derived from solar energy. Ameren Missouri expects to satisfy the nonsolar requirement in 2019 with its Keokuk and Maryland Heights energy centers, a 102-megawatt power purchase agreement with a wind farm operator, and an estimated purchase of approximately $2 million of renewable energy credits
in the market. The Keokuk energy center generates electricity using a hydroelectric dam located on the Mississippi River. The Maryland Heights energy center generates electricity by burning methane gas collected from a landfill. Ameren Missouri is meeting the solar energy requirement by purchasing solar-generated renewable energy credits from customer-installed systems and by generating solar energy at its O’Fallon energy center and its headquarters building. In 2018, Ameren Missouri entered into build-transfer agreements to purchase up to 557 megawatts of wind generation. For additional information on these agreements, see Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Effective June 2017, the FEJA requires the IPA to procure renewable energy credits for all electric distribution customers in Illinois, including those customers supplied by alternative retail electric suppliers.
The IPA’s initial long-term renewable resources procurement plan was approved by the ICC in 2018. The IPA’s plan set forth guidelines by which the IPA should procure 15-year contracts for four million wind renewable energy credits per year and four million solar renewable energy credits per year, allocated among Ameren Illinois, Commonwealth Edison Company, and MidAmerican Energy Company based on load. As a result of the allocation, Ameren Illinois is required to purchase 1.2 million wind renewable energy credits per year and 1.2 million solar renewable energy credits per year. The IPA has completed several procurement events, resulting in contractual commitments of 0.9 million wind renewable energy credits per year and 0.9 million solar renewable energy credits per year for Ameren Illinois. The remaining 0.3 million wind renewable and 0.3 million solar energy credits per year for Ameren Illinois will be obtained through IPA procurement events in 2019. Ameren Illinois
will execute additional renewable energy credit contracts after these procurements in 2019. The IPA is expected to file its second long-term renewable resources procurement plan in 2019, which, once approved, will establish the 2020 and 2021 renewable energy credit procurement targets.
The FEJA also required Ameren Illinois to enter into contracts for zero emission credits in an amount equal to approximately 16% of the actual amount of electricity delivered to retail customers during calendar year 2014. This one-time zero emission credit procurement by the IPA, approval by the ICC, and execution of zero emission credit contracts were all completed in 2018. Contracts are for 10 years with quantities allocated among Ameren Illinois, Commonwealth Edison Company, and MidAmerican Energy Company. Both renewable energy credits and zero emission credits have cost recovery tariff mechanisms which fully recover or refund the variance
between actual costs incurred from the resulting contracts and the amounts collected from customers.
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois have implemented energy-efficiency programs to educate and to help their customers become more efficient energy consumers. In Missouri, the MEEIA established a regulatory recovery mechanism that, among other things, allows electric utilities to recover costs with respect to MoPSC-approved customer energy-efficiency programs. The law requires the MoPSC to ensure that a utility’s financial incentives are aligned to help customers use energy more efficiently, to provide timely cost recovery, and to provide earnings opportunities associated with cost-effective energy-efficiency programs. Missouri does not have a law mandating energy-efficiency programs.
In
February 2016, the MoPSC issued an order approving Ameren Missouri’s MEEIA 2016 plan. That plan included a portfolio of customer energy-efficiency programs, along with a regulatory recovery mechanism. The MoPSC’s order included a performance incentive that provides for additional revenues if certain MEEIA 2016 customer energy-efficiency goals are achieved, including $27 million if 100% of the goals are achieved during the three-year period. Ameren Missouri must achieve at least 25% of its energy efficiency-goals to be eligible for a MEEIA 2016 performance incentive and can earn more if its energy savings exceed those goals. Through 2018, Ameren Missouri invested $136 million in MEEIA 2016 customer energy-efficiency programs and recognized $11 million in additional revenue related to performance incentives.
In December 2018, the MoPSC issued an order approving Ameren Missouri’s MEEIA 2019 plan. The plan includes a portfolio
of customer energy-efficiency programs through December 2021 and low-income customer energy-efficiency programs through December 2024, along with a regulatory recovery mechanism. Ameren Missouri intends to invest $226 million over the life of the plan, including $65
million per year through 2021. In addition, the plan includes a performance incentive that provides Ameren Missouri an opportunity to earn additional revenues by achieving certain customer energy-efficiency goals, including $30 million if 100% of the goals are achieved during the period ended December 2021. Additional revenues may be earned if Ameren Missouri exceeds 100% of its energy savings
goals.
Both the MEEIA 2016 and MEEIA 2019 plans include the continued use of the MEEIA rider. The MEEIA rider allows Ameren Missouri to collect from, or refund to, customers any difference between actual program costs, lost electric margins, and any performance incentive and the amounts collected from customers, without a traditional rate proceeding until lower volumes resulting from the MEEIA programs are reflected in base rates. Customer rates, based upon both forecasted program costs and lost electric margins and collected via the MEEIA rider, are reconciled annually to actual results.
State law requires Ameren Illinois to offer customer energy-efficiency programs. In September 2017, the ICC issued an order approving Ameren Illinois’ electric and natural gas energy-efficiency plans, as well as regulatory recovery mechanisms. The order authorized electric and natural gas energy-efficiency
program expenditures of $394 million and $62 million, respectively, for the 2018 through 2021 period. Additionally, as part of its IEIMA capital project investments, Ameren Illinois has invested approximately $380 million in smart-grid infrastructure since 2012, including smart meters that enable customers to improve their energy efficiency, and expects to spend another $60 million by 2021.
Historically, Ameren Illinois recovered the cost of its energy-efficiency programs as they were incurred. The FEJA allows Ameren Illinois to earn a return on its electric energy-efficiency program investments made since June 2017. Ameren Illinois’ electric energy-efficiency investments are deferred as a regulatory asset and earn a return at the company’s weighted-average cost of capital, with the equity return based on the annual average of the monthly yields of the 30-year United States Treasury bonds plus 580 basis points. The equity portion
of Ameren Illinois’ return on electric energy-efficiency investments can be increased or decreased by up to 200 basis points, depending on the achievement of annual energy savings goals. Ameren Illinois plans to invest approximately $100 million per year in electric energy-efficiency programs through 2023, consistent with targets established by the FEJA. The ICC can lower the electric energy-efficiency saving goals if sufficient cost-effective measures are not available. The electric energy-efficiency program investments and the return on those investments will be recovered through a rider; they will not be included in the IEIMA formula rate process.
NATURAL GAS SUPPLY FOR DISTRIBUTION
Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois are responsible for the purchase and delivery
of natural gas to their customers. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois each develop and manage a portfolio of natural gas supply resources. These resources include firm natural gas supply agreements with producers, firm interstate and intrastate transportation capacity, firm no-notice storage capacity leased from interstate pipelines, and on-system storage facilities to maintain natural gas deliveries to customers throughout the year and especially during peak demand periods. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois primarily use Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, Trunkline Gas Company, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America, Mississippi River Transmission Corporation, Northern Border Pipeline Company, and Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation interstate pipeline systems to transport natural gas to their systems. In addition to transactions requiring physical delivery, certain financial instruments, including those entered into in the NYMEX futures market and in the over-the-counter
financial markets, are used to hedge the price paid for natural gas. Natural gas supply costs are passed on to customers of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois under PGA clauses, subject to prudence reviews by the MoPSC and the ICC. As of December 31, 2018, Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois had price-hedged 62% and 76%, respectively, of their expected 2019 natural gas supply requirements.
For additional information on our fuel, purchased power, and natural gas for distribution supply, see Results of Operations and Liquidity and Capital Resources in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Part II, Item 7, of this report and Commodity Price Risk under Part II, Item 7A, of this report. Also
see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Note 7 – Derivative Financial Instruments, Note 13 – Related-party Transactions, and Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item 8 of this report.
INDUSTRY ISSUES
We are facing issues common to the electric and natural gas utility industry. These issues include:
•
political, regulatory, and customer resistance to higher rates;
•
the
potential for changes in laws, regulations, enforcement efforts, and policies at the state and federal levels;
•
corporate tax law changes, as well as additional interpretations, regulations, amendments, or technical corrections that affect the amount and timing of income tax payments, reduce or limit the ability to claim certain deductions and use carryforward tax benefits, or result in rate base reductions;
•
cybersecurity risks, including the loss of operational control of energy centers and electric and natural gas
transmission and distribution systems and/or the theft or inappropriate release of certain types of information, including sensitive customer, employee, financial, and operating system information;
•
the potential for more intense competition in generation, supply, and distribution, including new technologies and their declining costs;
the
impact and effectiveness of vegetation management programs;
•
net metering rules and other changes in existing regulatory frameworks and recovery mechanisms to address the allocation of costs to customers who own generation resources that enable them both to sell power to us and to purchase power from us through the use of our transmission and distribution assets;
•
legislation or programs to encourage or mandate energy efficiency and renewable sources of power and the lack of consensus as to who should pay for those programs;
•
pressure
on customer growth and usage in light of economic conditions, distributed generation, technological advances, and energy-efficiency initiatives;
•
changes in the structure of the industry as a result of changes in federal and state laws, including the formation and growth of independent transmission entities;
•
changes in the allowed return on common equity on FERC-regulated electric transmission assets;
•
the
availability of fuel and fluctuations in fuel prices;
•
the availability of a skilled work force, including retaining the specialized skills of those who are nearing retirement;
•
regulatory lag;
•
the influence of macroeconomic factors on yields of United States Treasury securities and on allowed
rates of return on equity provided by regulators;
•
higher levels of infrastructure and technology investments and adjustments to customer rates associated with the TCJA that are expected to result in negative or decreased free cash flow, which is defined as cash flows from operating activities less cash flows from investing activities and dividends paid;
•
public concerns about the siting of new facilities;
•
complex
new and proposed environmental laws including statutes, regulations, and requirements, such as air and water quality standards, mercury emissions standards, CCR management requirements, and potential CO2 limitations, which may reduce the frequency at which electric generating units are dispatched based upon their CO2 emissions;
•
public concerns about the potential environmental impacts from the combustion of fossil fuels and some investors’ concerns about investing in energy companies that have fossil fuel-fired generation assets;
•
aging
infrastructure and the need to construct new power generation, transmission, and distribution facilities, which have long time frames for completion, with limited long-term ability to predict power and commodity prices and regulatory requirements;
•
public concerns about nuclear generation, decommissioning, and the disposal of nuclear waste; and
•
consolidation of electric and natural gas utility companies.
We are monitoring all these issues. Except as otherwise
noted in this report, we are unable to predict what impact, if any, these issues will have on our results of operations, financial position, or liquidity. For additional information, see Risk Factors under Part I, Item 1A, Outlook in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Part II, Item 7, Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters, Note 9 – Callaway Energy Center, and Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
The
following tables present key electric and natural gas operating statistics for Ameren for the past three years:
Electric Operating Statistics – Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2016
Electric
Sales – kilowatthours (in millions):
Ameren Missouri:
Residential
14,320
12,653
13,245
Commercial
14,791
14,384
14,712
Industrial
4,499
4,469
4,790
Street
lighting and public authority
108
117
125
Ameren Missouri retail load subtotal
33,718
31,623
32,872
Off-system
10,036
10,640
7,125
Ameren
Missouri total
43,754
42,263
39,997
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution(a):
Residential
12,099
10,985
11,512
Commercial
12,717
12,382
12,583
Industrial
11,673
11,436
11,738
Street
lighting and public authority
513
515
521
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution total
37,002
35,318
36,354
Eliminate
affiliate sales
(288
)
(440
)
(520
)
Ameren total
80,468
77,141
75,831
Electric
Operating Revenues (in millions):
Ameren Missouri:
Residential
$
1,560
$
1,417
$
1,422
Commercial
1,271
1,208
1,224
Industrial
312
305
315
Other,
including street lighting and public authority
30
(b)
111
102
Ameren Missouri retail load subtotal
$
3,173
$
3,041
$
3,063
Off-system
278
370
333
Ameren
Missouri total
$
3,451
$
3,411
$
3,396
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution:
Residential
$
867
$
870
$
895
Commercial
511
527
517
Industrial
130
113
96
Other,
including street lighting and public authority
39
58
40
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution total
$
1,547
$
1,568
$
1,548
Ameren
Transmission:
Ameren Illinois Transmission(c)
$
267
$
258
$
232
ATXI
166
168
123
Ameren
Transmission total
$
433
$
426
$
355
Other and intersegment eliminations
(92
)
(98
)
(103
)
Ameren
total
$
5,339
$
5,307
$
5,196
(a)
Sales
for which power was supplied by Ameren Illinois as well as alternative retail electric suppliers. In 2018, 2017, and 2016, Ameren Illinois procured power on behalf of its customers for 23% of its total kilowatthour sales.
(b)
Includes $60 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, for the reduction to revenue for the excess amounts collected in rates related to the TCJA from January 1, 2018, through July 31, 2018. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters for additional information.
(c)
Includes
$53 million, $42 million, and $45 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, of electric operating revenues from transmission services provided to Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution.
Electric Operating Statistics – Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2016
Ameren
Missouri fuel costs (cents per kilowatthour generated)(a)
1.59
¢
1.75
¢
1.79
¢
Source
of Ameren Missouri energy supply:
Coal
67.8
%
70.9
%
66.2
%
Nuclear
23.7
19.0
22.8
Hydroelectric
2.5
3.4
3.3
Natural
gas
1.0
0.7
0.7
Methane gas and solar
0.1
0.1
0.1
Purchased
– Wind
0.6
0.7
0.8
Purchased – Other
4.3
5.2
6.1
Ameren
Missouri total
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
(a) Ameren Missouri fuel costs exclude $44 million, $(35) million, and $5 million, respectively for changes in FAC recoveries.
The Ameren Companies make available free of charge through Ameren’s website (www.ameren.com) their annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed with or furnished to the SEC pursuant to Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably possible after such reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. These documents, along with eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) documents, are also available through the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov). Ameren’s website is a channel
of distribution for material information about the Ameren Companies. Financial and other material information is routinely posted to, and accessible at, Ameren’s website.
The Ameren Companies also make available free of charge through Ameren’s website the charters of Ameren’s board of directors’ audit and risk committee, human resources committee, nominating and corporate governance committee, finance committee, and nuclear and operations committee; the corporate governance guidelines; a policy regarding communications to the board of directors; a policy and procedures document with respect to related-person transactions; a code of ethics for principal executive and senior financial officers; a code of business conduct applicable to all directors, officers and employees; and a director nomination policy that applies to the Ameren Companies. The information on Ameren’s website, or any other website referenced in this report,
is not incorporated by reference into this report.
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
Investors should review carefully the following material risk factors and the other information contained in this report. The risks that the Ameren Companies face are not limited to those in this section. There may be further risks and uncertainties that are not presently known or that are not currently believed to be material that may adversely affect the results of operations, financial position, and liquidity of the Ameren Companies.
REGULATORY AND LEGISLATIVE
RISKS
We are subject to extensive regulation of our businesses, which could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
We are subject to federal, state, and local regulation. Our extensive regulatory frameworks, some of which are more specifically identified in the following risk factors, regulate, among other matters, the electric and natural gas utility industries; the rate and cost structure of utilities; the operation of nuclear power plants; the construction and operation of generation, transmission, and distribution facilities; the acquisition, disposal, depreciation and amortization of assets and facilities; the electric transmission system reliability; and wholesale and retail competition. In the planning and management of our operations, we must address the effects of existing and proposed laws and regulations and potential changes in our
regulatory frameworks, including initiatives by federal and state legislatures, RTOs, utility regulators, and taxing authorities. Significant changes in the nature of the regulation of our businesses could require changes to our business planning and management of our businesses and could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity. Failure to obtain adequate rates or regulatory approvals in a timely manner; failure to obtain necessary licenses or permits from regulatory authorities; the impact of new or modified laws, regulations, standards, interpretations, or other legal requirements; or increased compliance costs could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
The electric and natural gas rates that we are allowed to charge are determined through regulatory proceedings, which are subject to intervention and appeal. Rates are also subject to legislative
actions, which are largely outside of our control. Any events that prevent us from recovering our costs in a timely manner or from earning adequate returns on our investments could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
The rates that we are allowed to charge for our utility services significantly influence our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity. The electric and natural gas utility industry is highly regulated. The utility rates charged to customers are determined by governmental entities, including the MoPSC, the ICC, and the FERC. Decisions by these entities are influenced by many factors, including the cost of providing service, the prudency of expenditures, the quality of service, regulatory staff knowledge and experience, customer intervention, and economic conditions, as well as social and political views. Decisions made by these governmental
entities regarding rates are largely outside of our control. We are exposed to regulatory lag and cost disallowances to varying degrees by jurisdiction, which, if unmitigated, could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity. Rate orders are also subject to appeal, which creates additional uncertainty as to the rates that we will ultimately be allowed to charge for our services. From time to time, our regulators may approve trackers, riders, or other mechanisms that allow electric or natural gas rates to be adjusted without a traditional rate proceeding. These mechanisms could be changed or terminated.
Ameren Missouri’s electric and natural gas utility rates and Ameren Illinois’ natural gas utility rates are typically established in regulatory proceedings that take up to 11 months to complete. Ameren Missouri’s rates established in those proceedings are primarily based
on
historical costs and revenues. Ameren Illinois’ natural gas rates established in those proceedings are based on estimated future costs and revenues. Thus, the rates that we are allowed to charge for utility services may not match our actual costs at any given time.
Rates include an allowed rate of return on investments established by the regulator, including a return on invested capital, both debt and equity, and an amount for income taxes. Although rate regulation is premised on providing an opportunity to earn a reasonable rate of return on invested capital, there can be no assurance that the regulator will
determine that our costs were prudently incurred or that the regulatory process will result in rates that will produce full recovery of such costs or provide for an opportunity to earn a reasonable return on those investments. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois, and the utility industry generally, have an increased need for cost recovery, primarily driven by capital investments, which is likely to continue in the future. The resulting increase to the revenue requirement needed to recover such costs and earn a return on investments could result in more frequent regulatory rate reviews and requests for cost recovery mechanisms. Additionally, increasing rates could result in regulatory or legislative actions, as well as competitive or political pressures, all of which could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
As a result of its participation in performance-based formula ratemaking, Ameren
Illinois’ return on equity for its electric distribution service and its electric energy-efficiency investments is directly correlated to yields on United States Treasury bonds. Additionally, Ameren Illinois is required to achieve certain performance standards. Failure to meet these requirements could adversely affect Ameren’s and Ameren Illinois’ results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Ameren Illinois participates in a performance-based formula ratemaking framework established pursuant to the IEIMA for its electric distribution service. Ameren Illinois is allowed to recover its electric distribution revenue requirement for a given year, independent of actual sales volumes. Ameren Illinois also has an electric energy-efficiency program rider, which includes a return on its program investments that is subject to performance-based formula ratemaking. The ICC annually reviews Ameren Illinois’ rate filings for
reasonableness and prudency. If the ICC were to conclude that Ameren Illinois’ costs were not prudently incurred, the ICC would disallow recovery of such costs. The electric distribution service performance-based formula ratemaking framework expires at the end of 2022, while the decoupling provisions extend beyond the end of formula ratemaking by law. Ameren Illinois would then be required to establish future rates through a traditional rate proceeding with the ICC, which might result in rates that do not produce a full or timely recovery of costs or provide for an adequate return on investments and would expose Ameren Illinois’ electric distribution business to the risks described in the immediately preceding risk factor.
The return on equity component under both formula ratemaking recovery mechanisms is equal to the annual average of the monthly yields of the 30-year United States Treasury bonds plus
580 basis points. Therefore, Ameren Illinois’ annual return on equity for its electric distribution business is directly correlated to the yields on such bonds, which are outside of Ameren Illinois’ control. With respect to electric distribution service, a 50 basis point change in the annual average of the monthly yields of the 30-year United States Treasury bonds would result in an estimated $8 million change in Ameren’s and Ameren Illinois’ net income, based on its 2019 projected rate base.
Ameren Illinois is also subject to performance standards. Failure to achieve the standards would result in a reduction in the company’s allowed return on equity calculated under the ratemaking formulas. The performance standards applicable to electric distribution
service include improvements in service reliability to reduce both the frequency and duration of outages, a reduction in the number of estimated bills, a reduction of consumption from inactive meters, and a reduction in bad debt expense. The electric distribution service regulatory framework provides for return on equity penalties up to 38 basis points in each year from 2019 through 2022, if these performance standards are not met. Beginning in 2018, the rider for electric energy-efficiency investments provides for increases or decreases of up to 200 basis points to the return on equity. Any adjustments to the return on equity for energy-efficiency investments will depend on annual performance of a historical period relative to energy savings goals. In 2018, there were no performance-related basis point adjustments.
Ameren Illinois plans to invest approximately $100 million per year in electric energy-efficiency programs through
2023, consistent with targets established by the FEJA. The ICC has the ability to reduce electric energy-efficiency savings goals if there are insufficient cost-effective programs available or if the savings goals would require investment levels that exceed amounts allowed by legislation.
As a result of PISA, Ameren Missouri’s electric rates are subject to a rate cap. Failure to align capital investments and expenses under the rate cap will adversely affect Ameren’s and Ameren Missouri’s results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
As a result of Ameren Missouri’s decision to participate in PISA, its rate increases are limited to a 2.85% compound annual growth rate in the average overall customer rate per kilowatthour, based on the electric rates that became effective in April 2017, less half of the annual savings from the
TCJA that was passed on to customers as approved in the July 2018 MoPSC order. Additionally, Ameren Missouri’s electric base rates, as determined in the July 2018 MoPSC order, are frozen until April 1, 2020. Customer rates under the MEEIA, the FAC, and the RESRAM riders have not been frozen. If rate changes from the FAC or the RESRAM riders would cause rates to temporarily exceed the 2.85% rate cap, the overage would be deferred for future recovery in the next regulatory rate review; however, rates established in such regulatory rate review will be subject to the rate cap. Any deferred overages approved for recovery will be recovered in a manner consistent with costs recovered under PISA. Increased capital investments and operating costs could cause customer rates to exceed the rate cap. Excluding customer rates under the MEEIA rider, which are not subject to the rate cap, Ameren Missouri would incur a penalty equal to
the
amount of deferred overage that would cause customer rates to exceed the 2.85% rate cap. A penalty incurred as the result of exceeding the rate cap could adversely affect Ameren’s and Ameren Missouri’s results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Both the rate cap and PISA election are effective through December 2023, unless Ameren Missouri requests and receives MoPSC approval of an extension through December 2028.
Ameren and Ameren Illinois may not realize the expected return on their electric transmission investments, which could adversely affect their
results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Ameren, through ATXI and Ameren Illinois, is investing significant capital resources in electric transmission. These investments are based on the FERC’s regulatory framework and a rate of return on common equity that is currently higher than that allowed by our state commissions. However, the FERC regulatory framework and rate of return are subject to change, including change as a result of existing and future third-party complaints and challenges at the FERC and the new methodology for determining the base return on common equity proposed by the FERC in November 2018. Accordingly, the regulatory framework may be less favorable or the rate of return may be lower in the future, compared with the current regulatory environment and rate of return, all of which may adversely affect Ameren’s and Ameren Illinois’ results of operations, financial position, and liquidity. A
pending complaint case filed with the FERC in February 2015 could reduce the allowed return on common equity and could require customer refunds. A 50 basis point reduction in the FERC-allowed return on common equity would reduce Ameren’s and Ameren Illinois’ earnings by an estimated $9 million and $5 million, respectively, based on each company’s 2019 projected rate base.
We are subject to various environmental laws. Significant capital expenditures are required to achieve and to maintain compliance with these environmental laws. Failure to comply with these laws could result in the closing of facilities, alterations to the manner in which these facilities operate, increased operating costs, or exposure to fines and liabilities.
We are subject to
various environmental laws, including statutes and regulations, enforced by federal, state, and local authorities. The development and operation of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities and natural gas storage, transmission, and distribution facilities can trigger compliance obligations with respect to environmental laws. These laws address emissions, discharges to water, water intake, impacts to air, land, and water, and chemical and waste handling. Complex and lengthy processes are required to obtain and renew approvals, permits, and licenses for new, existing or modified facilities. Additionally, the use and handling of various chemicals or hazardous materials require release prevention plans and emergency response procedures. Ameren is also subject to risks from changing or conflicting interpretations of existing laws.
We are also subject to liability under environmental laws
that address the remediation of environmental contamination on property currently or formerly owned by us or by our predecessors, as well as property contaminated by hazardous substances that we generated. Such properties include MGP sites and third-party sites, such as landfills. Additionally, private individuals may seek to enforce environmental laws against us. They could allege injury from exposure to hazardous materials, allege a failure to comply with environmental laws, seek to compel remediation of environmental contamination, or seek to recover damages resulting from that contamination.
The EPA has promulgated environmental regulations that have a significant impact on the electric utility industry. Over time, compliance with these regulations could be costly for Ameren Missouri, which operates coal-fired power plants. As of December 31,
2018, Ameren Missouri’s fossil fuel-fired energy centers represented 16% and 32% of Ameren’s and Ameren Missouri’s rate base, respectively. Regulations that apply to air emissions from the electric utility industry include the NSPS, the CSAPR, the MATS, and the National Ambient Air Quality Standards, which are subject to periodic review for certain pollutants. Collectively, these regulations cover a variety of pollutants, such as SO2, particulate matter, NOx,mercury, toxic metals, and acid gases, and CO2 emissions from new power plants. Water intake and discharges from power plants are regulated under the Clean Water Act. Such regulation could require
modifications to water intake structures or more stringent limitations on wastewater discharges at Ameren Missouri’s energy centers, either of which could result in significant capital expenditures. The management and disposal of coal ash is regulated under the CCR rule, which will require the closure of surface impoundments and the installations of dry ash handling systems at several of Ameren Missouri’s energy centers. The individual or combined effects of existing environmental regulations could result in significant capital expenditures, increased operating costs, or the closure or alteration of operations at some of Ameren Missouri’s energy centers.
In January 2011, the Department of Justice, on behalf of the EPA, filed a complaint against Ameren Missouri in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. The complaint, as amended in October 2013, alleged that in performing projects at its Rush Island
coal-fired energy center in 2007 and 2010, Ameren Missouri violated provisions of the Clean Air Act and Missouri law. The litigation has been divided into two phases: liability and remedy. In the first phase, in January 2017, the district court issued a liability ruling that the projects violated provisions of the Clean Air Act and Missouri law. In the second phase, the district court will determine the actions required to remedy the violations found in the liability phase. The EPA previously withdrew all claims for penalties and fines. Hearings on remedy-related issues are scheduled for April 2019. The ultimate resolution of this matter could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial position, and liquidity of Ameren and Ameren Missouri. Among other things and subject to economic and regulatory considerations, resolution
of this matter could result in increased capital expenditures for the installation of pollution control equipment, as well as increased operations and maintenance expenses.
In 2015, the EPA issued the Clean Power Plan, which would have established CO2 emissions standards applicable to existing power plants. The United States Supreme Court stayed the rule in February 2016, pending various legal challenges. In August 2018, the EPA proposed to repeal and replace the Clean Power Plan with a proposed new rule known as the Affordable Clean Energy Rule, which establishes emission guidelines for states to follow in developing plans to limit CO2 emissions from power plants. The EPA proposes to use certain efficiency measures
as the best system of emission reduction for coal-fired power plants. We cannot predict the outcome of the EPA’s future rulemaking or the outcome of any legal challenges relating to such future rulemakings, any of which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Ameren and Ameren Missouri have incurred and expect to incur significant costs with respect to environmental compliance and site remediation. New or revised environmental regulations, enforcement initiatives, or legislation could result in a significant increase in capital expenditures and operating costs, decreased revenues, increased financing requirements, penalties or fines, or reduced operations of some of Ameren Missouri’s coal-fired energy centers, which, in turn, could lead to increased liquidity needs and higher financing costs. Actions required to ensure that Ameren Missouri’s facilities
and operations are in compliance with environmental laws could be prohibitively expensive for Ameren Missouri if the costs are not fully recovered through rates. Environmental laws could require Ameren Missouri to close or to alter significantly the operations of its energy centers. If Ameren Missouri requests recovery of capital expenditures and costs for environmental compliance through rates, the MoPSC could deny recovery of all or a portion of these costs, prevent timely recovery, or make changes to the regulatory framework in an effort to minimize rate volatility and customer rate increases. Capital expenditures and costs to comply with future legislation or regulations might result in Ameren Missouri closing coal-fired energy centers earlier than planned. If these costs are not recoverable through rates, it could lead to an impairment of assets and reduced revenues. Any of the foregoing could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial positions,
and liquidity.
Customers’, legislators’, and regulators’ opinions of us are affected by many factors, including system reliability, implementation of our investment plans, protection of customer information, rates, and media coverage. To the extent that customers, legislators, or regulators have or develop a negative opinion of us, our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity could be adversely affected.
Service interruptions can occur due to failures of equipment as a result of severe or destructive weather or other causes. The ability of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois to respond promptly to such failures can affect customer satisfaction. In addition to system reliability issues, the success of modernization efforts, our ability to safeguard sensitive customer information and protect our systems from cyber attacks, and other actions can affect customer satisfaction.
The level of rates, the timing and magnitude of rate increases, and the volatility of rates can also affect customer satisfaction. Customers’, legislators’, and regulators’ opinions of us can also be affected by media coverage, including social media, which may include information, whether factual or not, that damages our brand and reputation.
If customers, legislators, or regulators have or develop a negative opinion of us and our utility services, this could result in increased costs associated with regulatory oversight and could affect the returns on common equity we are allowed to earn. Additionally, negative opinions about us could make it more difficult for our utilities to achieve favorable legislative or regulatory outcomes. Negative opinions could also result in sales volume reductions or increased use of distributed generation by our customers. Any of these consequences could adversely affect our results of operations,
financial position, and liquidity.
We are subject to federal regulatory compliance and proceedings, which exposes us to the potential for regulatory penalties and other sanctions.
The FERC can impose civil penalties of approximately $1.3 million per violation per day for violation of its regulations, rules, and orders, including mandatory NERC reliability standards. As owners and operators of bulk power transmission systems and electric energy centers, we are subject to mandatory NERC reliability standards, including cybersecurity standards. Compliance with these mandatory reliability standards may subject us to higher operating costs and may result in increased capital expenditures. If we were found not to be in compliance with these mandatory reliability standards, FERC regulations, rules, and orders, we could incur substantial monetary penalties and other sanctions, which could
adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity. The FERC also conducts audits and reviews of Ameren Missouri’s, Ameren Illinois’, and ATXI’s accounting records to assess the accuracy of its formula ratemaking process, and it can require refunds to customers for previously billed amounts, with interest.
The construction and acquisition of, and capital improvements to, electric and natural gas utility infrastructure involve substantial risks. These risks include escalating costs, unsatisfactory performance by the projects when completed, the inability to complete projects
as scheduled, cost disallowances by regulators, and the inability to earn an adequate return on invested capital, any of which could result in higher costs and facility closures.
We expect to make significant capital expenditures to maintain and improve our electric and natural gas utility infrastructure and to comply with existing environmental regulations. We estimate that we will invest up to $13.9 billion (Ameren Missouri – up to $7.1 billion; Ameren Illinois – up to $6.6 billion; ATXI – up to $0.2 billion) of capital expenditures from 2019 through 2023. These estimates include allowance for equity funds used during construction,
but do not include any additional wind generation investments by Ameren Missouri beyond the two facilities that Ameren Missouri has agreed to acquire after construction. Investments in Ameren’s rate-regulated operations are expected to be recoverable from customers, but they are subject to prudence reviews and are exposed to regulatory lag of varying degrees by jurisdiction.
Our ability to complete construction projects successfully within projected estimates and to acquire wind generation facilities after they are constructed is contingent upon many variables and subject to substantial risks. These variables include, but are not limited to, project management expertise, escalating costs for labor and materials, including changes to tariffs on materials, reliance on third parties, the ability to obtain required project approvals, and the ability to obtain necessary rights-of-way, easements, and transmission
connections. Delays in obtaining permits or regulatory approvals, shortages in materials and qualified labor, suppliers and contractors who do not perform as required under their contracts, changes in the scope and timing of projects, the inability to raise capital on reasonable terms, or other events beyond our control could affect the schedule, cost, and performance of these projects. There is a risk that an energy center might not be permitted to continue to operate if pollution control equipment is not installed by prescribed deadlines or does not perform as expected. Should any such pollution control equipment not be installed on time or not perform as expected, Ameren Missouri could be subject to additional costs and to the loss of its investment in the project or facility. All of these project and construction risks could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Our electric generation,
transmission, and distribution facilities are subject to operational risks that could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Our financial performance depends on the successful operation of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities. Operation of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities involves many risks, including:
•
facility shutdowns due to operator error, or a failure of equipment or processes;
•
longer-than-anticipated
maintenance outages;
•
failures of equipment that can result in unanticipated liabilities or unplanned outages;
•
aging infrastructure that may require significant expenditures to operate and maintain;
•
disruptions in the delivery of fuel, failure of our fuel suppliers to provide adequate quantities
or quality of fuel, or lack of adequate inventories of fuel, including ultra-low-sulfur coal used by Ameren Missouri to comply with environmental regulations;
•
lack of adequate water required for cooling plant operations;
•
labor disputes;
•
disruptions in the delivery of electricity to our customers;
•
suppliers
and contractors who do not perform as required under their contracts;
•
failure of other operators’ facilities and the effect of that failure on our electric system and customers;
•
inability to comply with regulatory or permit requirements, including those relating to environmental laws;
•
handling,
storage, and disposition of CCR;
•
unusual or adverse weather conditions or other natural disasters, including severe storms, droughts, floods, tornadoes, earthquakes, solar flares, and electromagnetic pulses;
•
the occurrence of catastrophic events such as fires, explosions, acts of sabotage or terrorism, pandemic health events, or other similar events;
•
accidents
that might result in injury or loss of life, extensive property damage, or environmental damage;
•
ineffective vegetation management programs;
•
cybersecurity risks, including loss of operational control of Ameren Missouri’s energy centers and our transmission and distribution systems and loss of data, including sensitive customer, employee, financial, and operating system information, through insider or outsider actions;
•
limitations
on amounts of insurance available to cover losses that might arise in connection with operating our electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities;
•
inability to implement or maintain information systems;
•
failure to keep pace with and the ability to adapt to rapid technological change; and
other unanticipated operations and maintenance expenses and liabilities.
The foregoing risks could affect the controls and operations of our facilities or impede our ability to meet regulatory requirements, which could increase operating costs, increase our capital requirements and costs, reduce our revenues or have an adverse effect on our liquidity.
Ameren Missouri’s ownership and operation of a nuclear energy center creates business, financial, and waste disposal risks.
Ameren Missouri’s ownership of the Callaway energy center subjects it to risks associated with nuclear generation,
including:
•
potential harmful effects on the environment and human health resulting from radiological releases associated with the operation of nuclear facilities and the storage, handling, and disposal of radioactive materials;
•
continued uncertainty regarding the federal government’s plan to permanently store spent nuclear fuel and, as a result, the need to provide for long-term storage of spent nuclear fuel at the Callaway energy center;
•
limitations
on the amounts and types of insurance available to cover losses that might arise in connection with the Callaway energy center or other United States nuclear facilities;
•
uncertainties about contingencies and retrospective premium assessments relating to claims at the Callaway energy center or any other United States nuclear facilities;
•
public and governmental concerns about the safety and adequacy of security at nuclear facilities;
•
limited
availability of fuel supply and our reliance on licensed fuel assemblies from the one NRC-licensed supplier of Callaway energy center’s assemblies;
•
costly and extended outages for scheduled or unscheduled maintenance and refueling;
•
uncertainties about the technological and financial aspects of decommissioning nuclear facilities at the end of their licensed lives;
•
the
adverse effect of poor market performance and other economic factors on the asset values of nuclear decommissioning trust funds and the corresponding increase, upon MoPSC approval, in customer rates to fund the estimated decommissioning costs; and
•
potential adverse effects of a natural disaster, acts of sabotage or terrorism, including cyber attack, or any accident leading to a radiological release.
The NRC has broad authority under federal law to impose licensing and safety requirements for nuclear facilities. In the event of noncompliance, the NRC has the authority to impose fines or to shut down a unit, or both, depending upon its assessment of the severity of the situation, until
compliance is achieved. Revised safety requirements promulgated from time to time by the NRC could necessitate substantial capital expenditures at the Callaway energy center. In addition, if a serious nuclear incident were to occur, it could adversely affect Ameren’s and Ameren Missouri’s results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. A major incident at a nuclear facility anywhere in the world could cause the NRC to limit or prohibit the operation of any domestic nuclear unit and could also cause the NRC to impose additional conditions or requirements on the industry, which could increase costs and result in additional capital expenditures. NRC standards relating to seismic risk require Ameren Missouri to further evaluate the impact of an earthquake on its Callaway energy center due to its proximity to a fault line, which could require the installation of additional capital equipment.
Our natural gas distribution
and storage activities involve numerous risks that may result in accidents and increased operating costs.
Inherent in our natural gas distribution and storage activities are a variety of hazards and operating risks, such as leaks, explosions, mechanical problems and cybersecurity risks, which could cause substantial financial losses. In addition, these hazards could result in serious injury, loss of human life, significant damage to property, environmental impacts, and impairment of our operations, which in turn could lead us to incur substantial losses. The location of distribution mains and storage facilities near populated areas, including residential areas, business centers, industrial sites, and other public gathering places, could increase the level of damages resulting from these risks. A major domestic incident involving natural gas systems could lead to additional capital expenditures, increased regulation, and fines
and penalties on natural gas utilities. The occurrence of any of these events could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Significant portions of our electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities and natural gas transmission and distribution facilities are aging. This aging infrastructure may require significant additional maintenance or replacement that could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity. Additionally, Ameren Missouri’s results of operations, financial position, and liquidity could be adversely affected if an energy center’s costs or decommissioning costs associated with an energy center’s retirement are not fully recovered.
Our aging infrastructure may pose risks to system reliability and expose us to expedited or unplanned significant capital expenditures and operating costs.
All of Ameren Missouri’s coal-fired energy centers were constructed prior to 1978, and the Callaway energy center began operating in 1984. The age of these energy centers increases the risks of unplanned outages, reduced generation output, and higher maintenance expense. If, at the end of its life, an energy center’s cost has not been fully recovered, Ameren Missouri may be adversely affected if the MoPSC does not allow such cost to be recovered in rates. Ameren Missouri may also be adversely affected if the MoPSC does
not allow full or timely recovery of decommissioning costs associated with the retirement of an energy center. Aging transmission and distribution
facilities are more prone to failure than new facilities, which results in higher maintenance expense and the need to replace these facilities with new infrastructure. Even if the system is properly maintained, its reliability may ultimately deteriorate and negatively affect our ability to serve our customers, which could result in increased costs associated with regulatory oversight. The frequency and duration of customer outages are among the IEIMA performance standards. Any failure to achieve these standards will result in a reduction in Ameren Illinois’ allowed return on equity on electric distribution assets. The higher maintenance costs associated with aging infrastructure and capital expenditures for new or replacement infrastructure could cause additional rate volatility for our customers, resistance by our regulators to allow customer rate increases, and/or regulatory lag in some of our jurisdictions, any of which could adversely affect our results of operations,
financial position, and liquidity.
Energy conservation, energy efficiency, distributed generation, energy storage, technological advances, and other factors could reduce energy demand from Ameren Missouri’s customers.
Without a regulatory mechanism to ensure recovery, declines in energy usage could result in an under-recovery of Ameren Missouri’s revenue requirement, which could adversely affect Ameren and Ameren Missouri’s results of operations, financial position, and liquidity. Such declines could occur due to a number of factors:
•
Conservation and energy-efficiency programs. Missouri allows for conservation and energy-efficiency programs that are
designed to reduce energy demand.
•
Distributed generation and other energy-efficiency efforts. Ameren Missouri is exposed to declining usage from energy-efficiency efforts not related to its energy-efficiency programs, as well as from distributed generation sources, such as solar panels and other technologies. Ameren Missouri generates power at utility-scale energy centers to achieve economies of scale and to produce power at a competitive cost. Some distributed generation technologies have become more cost-competitive, with decreasing costs expected in the future. The costs of these distributed generation technologies may decline over time to a level that is competitive with that of Ameren Missouri’s energy centers. Additionally,
technological advances in energy storage may be coupled with distributed generation to reduce the demand for our electric utility services. Increased adoption of these technologies by customers could decrease our revenues if customers cease to use our generation, transmission, and distribution services at current levels. Ameren Missouri might incur stranded costs, which ultimately might not be recovered through rates.
•
Macroeconomic factors. Macroeconomic factors resulting in low economic growth or contraction within Ameren Missouri’s service territories could reduce energy demand.
We are subject to employee work force factors that could adversely affect our
operations.
Our businesses depend upon our ability to employ and retain key officers and other skilled professional and technical employees. A significant portion of our work force is nearing retirement, including many employees with specialized skills, such as maintaining and servicing our electric and natural gas infrastructure and operating our energy centers. We are also party to collective bargaining agreements that collectively represent about 51% of Ameren’s total employees. Any work stoppage experienced in connection with negotiations of collective bargaining agreements could adversely affect our operations.
Our operations are subject to acts of terrorism, cyber attacks, and other intentionally disruptive acts.
Like other electric and natural gas utilities, our energy centers, fuel storage
facilities, transmission and distribution facilities, and information systems may be affected by terrorist activities and other intentionally disruptive acts, including cyber attacks, which could disrupt our ability to produce or distribute our energy products. Within our industry, there have been attacks on energy infrastructure, such as substations and related assets, in the past, and there may be more attacks in the future. Any such incident could limit our ability to generate, purchase, or transmit power or natural gas and could have significant regional economic consequences. Any such disruption could result in a significant decrease in revenues, a significant increase in costs including those for repair, or adversely affect economic activity in our service territory which, in turn, could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
There has been an increase in the number and sophistication
of cyber attacks across all industries worldwide. A security breach at our physical assets or in our information systems could affect the reliability of the transmission and distribution system, disrupt electric generation, including nuclear generation, and/or subject us to financial harm resulting from theft or the inappropriate release of certain types of information, including sensitive customer, employee, financial, and operating system information. Many of our suppliers, vendors, contractors, and information technology providers have access to systems that support our operations and maintain customer and employee data. A breach of these third-party systems could adversely affect our business as if it was a breach of our own system. If a significant breach occurred, our reputation could be adversely affected, customer confidence could be diminished, and/or we could be subject to increased costs associated with regulatory oversight, fines or legal claims, any of which
could result in a significant decrease in revenues or significant costs for remedying the impacts of such a breach. Our generation, transmission, and distribution systems are part of an interconnected system. Therefore, a disruption caused by a cyber incident at another utility, electric generator, RTO, or commodity supplier could also adversely affect our businesses. Insurance might not be adequate to cover losses that arise in connection with these events. In addition, new
regulations could require changes in our security measures and result in increased costs. The occurrence of any of these events could adversely affect our results of operations, financial
position, and liquidity.
FINANCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND MARKET RISKS
Our businesses are dependent on our ability to access the capital markets successfully. We might not have access to sufficient capital in the amounts and at the times needed.
We rely on the issuance of short-term and long-term debt as significant sources of liquidity and funding for capital requirements not satisfied by our operating cash flow, as well as to refinance existing long-term debt. The inability to raise debt or equity capital at reasonable terms, or at all, could negatively affect our ability to maintain and to expand our businesses. Events beyond our control, such as depressed economic conditions or extreme volatility in the debt, equity, or credit markets, might create uncertainty that could increase our cost of capital or impair or eliminate our ability to access
the debt, equity, or credit markets, including our ability to draw on bank credit facilities. The unfavorable near-term impacts of the TCJA on our operating cash flows may adversely affect our credit ratings. Any adverse change in our credit ratings could reduce access to capital and trigger collateral postings and prepayments. Such changes could also increase the cost of borrowing and the costs of fuel, power, and natural gas supply, among other things, which could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Ameren’s holding company structure could limit its ability to pay common stock dividends and to service its debt obligations.
Ameren is a holding company; therefore, its primary assets are its investments in the common stock of its subsidiaries, including Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois, and ATXI. As a result, Ameren’s ability to pay dividends
on its common stock depends on the earnings of its subsidiaries and the ability of its subsidiaries to pay dividends or otherwise transfer funds to Ameren. Similarly, Ameren’s ability to service its debt obligations is dependent upon the earnings of its operating subsidiaries and the distribution of those earnings and other payments, including payments of principal and interest under affiliate indebtedness. The payment of dividends to Ameren by its subsidiaries in turn depends on their results of operations, and other items affecting retained earnings, and available cash. Ameren’s subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay any dividends or make any other distributions (except for payments required pursuant to the terms of affiliate borrowing arrangements and cash payments under the tax allocation agreement) to Ameren. Certain financing agreements, corporate organizational documents, and certain statutory
and regulatory requirements may impose restrictions on the ability of Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois, and ATXI to transfer funds to Ameren in the form of cash dividends, loans, or advances.
Increasing costs associated with our defined benefit retirement and postretirement plans, health care plans, and other employee benefits could adversely affect our financial position and liquidity.
Ameren offers defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans covering substantially all of its union employees. Ameren offers defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all of its non-union employees and postretirement benefit plans covering non-union employees hired before October 2015. Assumptions related to future costs, returns on investments, interest rates, timing of employee retirements, and mortality, as well as other actuarial matters, have a significant impact on our customers’
rates and our plan funding requirements. Ameren’s total unfunded obligation under its pension and postretirement benefit plans was $481 million as of December 31, 2018. Ameren expects to fund its pension plans at a level equal to the greater of the pension cost or the legally required minimum contribution. Based on Ameren’s assumptions at December 31, 2018, its investment performance in 2018, and its pension funding policy, Ameren expects to make annual contributions of approximately $20 million to $70 million in each of the next five years, with aggregate estimated contributions of $200
million. Ameren Missouri’s and Ameren Illinois’ portions of the future funding requirements are estimated to be 30% and 60%, respectively. These estimates may change with actual investment performance, changes in interest rates, changes in our assumptions, changes in government regulations, and any voluntary contributions.
In addition to the costs of our pension plans, the costs of providing health care benefits to our employees and retirees have increased in recent years. We believe that our employee benefit costs, including costs of health care plans for our employees and former employees, will continue to rise. Future legislative changes related to health care could also significantly change our benefit programs and costs. The increasing costs and funding requirements associated with our defined benefit retirement
plans, health care plans, and other employee benefits could increase our financing needs and otherwise adversely affect our financial position and liquidity.
For information on our principal properties, see the energy center table below. See also Liquidity and Capital Resources and Regulatory Matters in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Part II, Item 7, of this report for a discussion of planned additions, replacements, or transfers. See also Note 5 – Long-term Debt and Equity Financings and Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
The following table shows the anticipated capability of Ameren Missouri’s energy centers at the time of Ameren Missouri’s expected 2019 peak summer electrical demand:
Primary
Fuel Source
Energy Center
Location
Net Kilowatt Capability(a)
Coal
Labadie
Franklin County, Missouri
2,372,000
Rush Island
Jefferson County, Missouri
1,178,000
Sioux
St. Charles County, Missouri
972,000
Meramec(b)
St.
Louis County, Missouri
591,000
Total coal
5,113,000
Nuclear
Callaway
Callaway County, Missouri
1,194,000
Hydroelectric
Osage
Lakeside,
Missouri
235,000
Keokuk
Keokuk, Iowa
144,000
Total hydroelectric
379,000
Pumped-storage
Taum
Sauk
Reynolds County, Missouri
440,000
Natural gas (CTs)
Audrain(c)
Audrain County, Missouri
608,000
Venice(d)
Venice, Illinois
492,000
Goose
Creek
Piatt County, Illinois
438,000
Pinckneyville
Pinckneyville, Illinois
316,000
Raccoon Creek
Clay County, Illinois
304,000
Meramec(b)(d)(e)
St.
Louis County, Missouri
282,000
Kinmundy(d)
Kinmundy, Illinois
210,000
Peno Creek(c)(d)
Bowling Green, Missouri
192,000
Total
natural gas
2,842,000
Oil (CTs)
Fairgrounds
Jefferson City, Missouri
55,000
Meramec
St. Louis County, Missouri
55,000
Mexico
Mexico,
Missouri
54,000
Moberly
Moberly, Missouri
54,000
Moreau
Jefferson City, Missouri
54,000
Total oil
272,000
Methane
gas (CT)
Maryland Heights
Maryland Heights, Missouri
8,000
Solar
O’Fallon
O’Fallon, Missouri
3,000
Total Ameren and Ameren Missouri
10,251,000
(a)
Net
kilowatt capability is the generating capacity available for dispatch from the energy center into the electric transmission grid.
(b)
All coal-fueled kilowatts and 236,000 natural-gas-fueled kilowatts at the Meramec energy center are scheduled for retirement in 2022.
(c)
There are economic development arrangements applicable to these CTs.
(d)
These
CTs have the capability to operate on either oil or natural gas (dual fuel).
(e)
Two of its three units are steam-powered.
The following table presents in-service electric and natural gas utility-related properties for Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois as of December 31, 2018:
Ameren
Missouri
Ameren
Illinois
Circuit
miles of electric transmission lines(a)
2,971
4,639
Circuit miles of electric distribution lines
33,517
45,878
Percentage of circuit
miles of electric distribution lines underground
24
%
16
%
Miles of natural gas transmission and distribution mains
3,422
18,417
Underground natural gas storage fields
—
12
Total
working capacity of underground natural gas storage fields in billion cubic feet
—
24
(a)
ATXI owns 408 miles of transmission lines not reflected in this table.
Our other properties include office buildings, warehouses, garages, and repair shops.
With only a few exceptions, we have fee title to all principal
energy centers and other units of property material to the operation of our businesses, and to the real property on which such facilities are located (subject to mortgage liens securing our outstanding first mortgage bonds and to certain permitted liens and judgment liens). The exceptions are as follows:
A portion of Ameren Missouri’s Osage energy center reservoir, certain facilities at Ameren Missouri’s Sioux energy center, most of Ameren Missouri’s Peno Creek and Audrain CT energy centers,
Ameren Missouri’s Maryland Heights energy center, certain substations, and most transmission and distribution lines and natural gas mains are situated on lands occupied under leases, easements, franchises, licenses, or permits. The United States or the state of Missouri may own or may have paramount rights with respect to certain lands lying in the bed of the Osage River or located between the inner and outer harbor lines of the Mississippi River on which certain of Ameren Missouri’s energy centers and other properties are located.
•
The United States, the state of Illinois, the state of Iowa, or the city of Keokuk, Iowa, may own or may have paramount rights with respect to certain lands lying in the bed of the Mississippi River on which a portion
of Ameren Missouri’s Keokuk energy center is located.
Substantially all of the properties and plant of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois are subject to the liens of the indentures securing their mortgage bonds.
Ameren Missouri has conveyed most of its Peno Creek CT energy center to the city of Bowling Green, Missouri through 2022. Ameren Missouri has rights and obligations as the operator of the energy center under a long-term agreement with the city of Bowling Green. Under the terms of this agreement, Ameren Missouri is responsible for all operation and maintenance for the energy center. Ownership of the energy center will transfer to Ameren Missouri at the expiration of the agreement, at which time the property, plant, and equipment will become subject to the lien of the Ameren Missouri first mortgage bond indenture.
Ameren
Missouri operates a CT energy center located in Audrain County, Missouri. Ameren Missouri has rights and obligations as the operator of the energy center under a long-term agreement with Audrain County. Under the terms of this agreement, Ameren Missouri is responsible for all operation and maintenance for the energy center. The agreement will expire in December 2023. Ownership of the energy center will transfer to Ameren Missouri at the expiration of the agreement, at which time the property, plant, and equipment will become subject to the lien of the Ameren Missouri first mortgage bond indenture.
In 2018, Ameren Missouri entered into build-transfer agreements to purchase up to 557 megawatts of wind generation. For additional information on these agreements, see Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8 of this report.
ITEM
3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved in legal and administrative proceedings before various courts and agencies with respect to matters that arise in the ordinary course of business, some of which involve substantial amounts of money. We believe that the final disposition of these proceedings, except as otherwise disclosed in this report, will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position, or liquidity. Risk of loss is mitigated, in some cases, by insurance or contractual or statutory indemnification. We believe that we have established appropriate reserves for potential losses. Material legal and administrative proceedings, which are discussed in Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters, Note 9 – Callaway Energy Center, and Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item 8, of this report and are
incorporated herein by reference, include the following:
•
the February 2015 complaint case filed with the FERC seeking a reduction in the allowed base return on common equity under the MISO tariff;
•
the November 2018 FERC order requesting briefs regarding a new methodology for determining the base return on common equity under the MISO tariff and how to apply the new methodology to the February 2015 complaint case and the September 2016 order related to the November 2015 complaint case;
•
the
January 2019 appeal filed by the MoOPC challenging the MoPSC’s December 2018 order in the RESRAM case;
•
litigation against Ameren Missouri with respect to the EPA Clean Air Act; and
•
remediation matters associated with former MGP and waste disposal sites of the Ameren Companies.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANTS (ITEM 401(b) OF REGULATION S-K):
The executive officers of the Ameren Companies, including major subsidiaries, are listed below, along with their ages as of December 31, 2018, all their positions and offices held with the Ameren Companies
as of February 14, 2019, their tenures as officers, and their business backgrounds for at least the last five years. Some executive officers hold multiple positions within the Ameren Companies; their titles are given in the description of their business experience.
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Director
Baxter joined Ameren Missouri in 1995. He was elected to the positions of executive vice president and chief financial officer of Ameren, Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois, and Ameren Services in 2003. He was elected chairman, president, chief executive officer, and chief financial officer of Ameren Services in 2007. In 2009, he was elected chairman, president, and chief executive officer of Ameren Missouri. In 2014, he was elected chairman, president, and chief executive officer of Ameren, and relinquished his positions at Ameren Missouri.
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Lyons joined Ameren Services in 2001. In 2008, he was elected senior vice president and chief accounting officer of the Ameren Companies. In 2009, he was also elected chief financial officer of the Ameren Companies. In 2013, he was elected executive vice president and chief financial officer of the Ameren Companies, and relinquished his duties as chief accounting officer. In 2016, he was elected chairman and president of Ameren Services.
Gregory
L. Nelson
61
Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary
Nelson joined Ameren Missouri in 1995. He was elected vice president and tax counsel of Ameren Services in 1999 and vice president of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois in 2003. In 2010, he was elected vice president, tax and deputy general counsel of Ameren Services. He remained vice president of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois. In 2011, he was elected senior vice president, general counsel and secretary of the Ameren Companies. Nelson has notified Ameren of his intention to retire, effective August 1, 2019. Chonda
J. Nwamu, senior vice president and deputy general counsel, will succeed Nelson as senior vice president, general counsel, and secretary, effective upon his retirement.
Senior Vice President, Finance, and Chief Accounting Officer
Steinke
joined Ameren Services in 2002. In 2008, he was elected vice president and controller of Ameren, Ameren Illinois, and Ameren Services. In 2009, he relinquished his positions at Ameren Illinois. In 2013, he was elected senior vice president, finance, and chief accounting officer of the Ameren Companies.
Senior Vice President and Chief Digital Information Officer (Ameren Services)
Amirthalingam joined Ameren Services in March 2018 as senior vice president and chief digital information officer. She served as the chief information officer and vice president
North America for Schneider Electric SE, an energy management and automation solutions company, from January 2015 to March 2018 and in various roles at World Wide Technology Inc., a technology solution provider, from November 1999 to January 2015, most recently serving as vice president of customer solutions and innovation from September 2013 to January 2015.
Mark C. Birk
54
Senior
Vice President, Customer and Power Operations (Ameren Missouri)
Birk joined Ameren Missouri in 1986. In 2005, he was elected vice president, power operations, of Ameren Missouri. In 2012, he was elected senior vice president, corporate planning, of Ameren Services. In 2014, he was also elected senior vice president, oversight, of Ameren Services, and in 2015, he was elected senior vice president, corporate safety, planning and operations oversight. In January 2017, he was elected senior vice president, customer operations, at Ameren Missouri and relinquished his positions at Ameren Services. In October 2017, he was elected senior vice president, customer and power operations, at Ameren Missouri.
Fadi
M. Diya
56
Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer (Ameren Missouri)
Diya joined Ameren Missouri in 2005. In 2008, he was elected vice president, nuclear operations, of Ameren Missouri. In 2014, he was elected senior vice president and chief nuclear officer of Ameren Missouri.
Heger joined Ameren Missouri in 1976. In 2009, she was elected vice president, information technology, of Ameren Services, and in 2012, she was also elected chief information officer of Ameren Services. In 2015, she was elected senior vice president and chief information officer of Ameren Services. In February 2019, she was elected senior vice president, customer experience, at Ameren Illinois.
Mark C. Lindgren
51
Senior
Vice President, Corporate Communications and Chief Human Resources Officer (Ameren Services)
Lindgren joined Ameren Services in 1998. In 2009, he was elected vice president, human resources, of Ameren Services, and in 2012, he was also elected chief human resources officer of Ameren Services. In 2015, he was elected senior vice president, corporate communications, and chief human resources officer of Ameren Services.
Mark joined Ameren Services in 2002 as vice president, customer service. In 2003, he was elected vice president, governmental policy and consumer affairs, of Ameren Services. In 2005, he was elected senior vice president, customer operations, of Ameren Missouri. In 2007, he relinquished his position at Ameren Services. In 2012, he relinquished his position at Ameren Missouri and was elected chairman and president of Ameren Illinois.
Moehn joined Ameren Services in 2000. In 2004, he was elected vice president, corporate planning, of Ameren Services. In 2008, he was elected senior vice president, corporate planning and business risk management, of Ameren Services. In 2012, he was elected senior vice president, customer operations, of Ameren Missouri, and relinquished his position at Ameren Services. In 2014, he was elected chairman and president of Ameren Missouri.
Chonda
J. Nwamu
47
Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel (Ameren Services)
Nwamu joined Ameren Services in September 2016 as vice president and deputy general counsel. In January 2019, she was elected senior vice president and deputy general counsel of Ameren Services. Prior to joining Ameren Services, she served as regulatory counsel at Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a public utility, from 2000 to May 2014 and as managing counsel and senior director from June 2014 to June 2016. She will succeed Gregory L. Nelson as senior vice president, general counsel, and secretary effective upon his retirement.
Shawn
E. Schukar
57
Chairman and President (ATXI)
Schukar joined a predecessor company of Ameren Illinois in 1984. In 2005, he was elected vice president, commercial RTO operations, of Ameren Services. In 2013, he was elected senior vice president, transmission operations, construction and project management, of ATXI. In 2017, he was elected chairman and president of ATXI.
Officers are generally elected or appointed annually by the respective board of directors of each company, following the election of board members at the annual meetings of shareholders. No special arrangement
or understanding exists between any of the above-named executive officers and the Ameren Companies nor, to our knowledge, with any other person or persons pursuant to which any executive officer was selected as an officer. There are no family relationships among the executive officers or between any executive officers and any directors of the Ameren Companies. Except as noted, the above-named executive officers have been employed by an Ameren company for more than five years in executive or management positions.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS’ COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Ameren’s common stock is listed on the NYSE (ticker symbol: AEE). Ameren common shareholders of record totaled 45,575 on January 31, 2019. There is no trading market for the common stock of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois. Ameren holds all outstanding common stock of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois.
Purchases of Equity Securities
Ameren Corporation, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois did not purchase any equity securities reportable under Item 703 of Regulation S-K during the period from October 1,
2018, to December 31, 2018.
Performance Graph
The following graph shows Ameren’s cumulative total shareholder return during the five years ended December 31, 2018. The graph also shows the cumulative total returns of the S&P 500 Index and the Edison Electric Institute Index (EEI Index), which comprises most investor-owned electric utilities in the United States. The comparison assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2013, in Ameren common stock and in each of the indices shown and that all of the dividends were reinvested.
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes
—
—
—
51
(1
)
Net
income attributable to Ameren common shareholders
815
523
653
630
586
Common
stock dividends
451
431
416
402
390
Continuing
operations earnings per share – basic
3.34
2.16
2.69
2.39
2.42
Continuing
operations earnings per share – diluted
3.32
2.14
2.68
2.38
2.40
Common
stock dividends per share
1.8475
1.7775
1.715
1.655
1.61
As
of December 31:
Total assets
$
27,215
$
25,945
$
24,699
$
23,640
$
22,289
Long-term
debt, excluding current maturities
7,859
7,094
6,595
6,880
6,085
Total
Ameren Corporation shareholders’ equity
7,631
7,184
7,103
6,946
6,713
Ameren
Missouri:
Operating revenues(a)
$
3,589
$
3,537
$
3,524
$
3,609
$
3,553
Operating
income(a)(b)
749
722
725
742
(c)
784
Net
income available to common shareholder
478
323
(d)
357
352
390
Dividends
to parent
375
362
355
575
340
As
of December 31:
Total assets
$
14,291
$
14,043
$
14,035
$
13,851
$
13,474
Long-term
debt, excluding current maturities
3,418
3,577
3,563
3,844
3,861
Total
shareholders’ equity
4,229
4,081
4,090
4,082
4,052
Ameren
Illinois:
Operating revenues(a)
$
2,576
$
2,527
$
2,489
$
2,466
$
2,498
Operating
income(a)(b)
512
569
519
446
425
Net
income available to common shareholder
304
268
252
214
201
Dividends
to parent
—
—
110
—
—
As
of December 31:
Total assets
$
11,319
$
10,345
$
9,474
$
8,903
$
8,204
Long-term
debt, excluding current maturities
3,296
2,373
2,338
2,342
2,224
Total
shareholders’ equity
3,774
3,310
3,034
2,897
2,661
(a)
Amounts
for 2017 and 2016 have been revised to reflect the adoption of accounting guidance on revenue from contracts with customers, effective for the Ameren Companies as of January 1, 2018. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional information. The 2015 and 2014 balances are not revised for this guidance and are not comparative.
(b)
Amounts have been revised to reflect the adoption of accounting guidance on the presentation of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit cost, effective for the Ameren Companies as of January 1, 2018. See Note 10 – Retirement Benefits under Part II,
Item 8, of this report for additional information.
(c)
Includes a $69 million provision recorded for all of the previously capitalized construction and operating license costs relating to the cancelled second nuclear unit at Ameren Missouri’s Callaway energy center.
(d)
Includes an increase to income tax expense of $154 million and $32 million as a result of the TCJA at Ameren and Ameren Missouri, respectively. See Note 12 – Income Taxes under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional information.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Ameren, headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, is a public utility holding company whose primary assets are its equity interests in its subsidiaries. Ameren’s subsidiaries are separate, independent legal entities with separate businesses, assets, and liabilities. Dividends on Ameren’s common stock and the payment of expenses by Ameren depend on distributions made to it by its subsidiaries.
Below
is a summary description of Ameren’s principal subsidiaries, which includes Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois, and ATXI. Ameren also has other subsidiaries that conduct other activities, such as providing shared services. A more detailed description can be found in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
•
Ameren Missouri operates a rate-regulated electric generation, transmission, and distribution business and a rate-regulated natural gas distribution business in Missouri.
•
Ameren
Illinois operates rate-regulated electric transmission, electric distribution, and natural gas distribution businesses in Illinois.
•
ATXI operates a FERC rate-regulated electric transmission business. ATXI is constructing MISO-approved electric transmission projects, including the Illinois Rivers and Mark Twain projects, and operates the Spoon River project, which was placed in service in February 2018. Ameren also evaluates competitive electric transmission investment opportunities as they arise.
Ameren has four segments: Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution,
Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Transmission. The Ameren Missouri segment includes all of the operations of Ameren Missouri. Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution consists of the electric distribution business of Ameren Illinois. Ameren Illinois Natural Gas consists of the natural gas business of Ameren Illinois. Ameren Transmission primarily consists of the aggregated electric transmission businesses of Ameren Illinois and ATXI. See Note 15 – Segment Information under Part II, Item 8, of this report for further discussion of Ameren’s, Ameren Missouri’s, and Ameren Illinois’ Segments.
Ameren’s financial statements are prepared on a consolidated basis and therefore include the accounts of its majority-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois have no subsidiaries. All tabular dollar amounts
are in millions, unless otherwise indicated.
In addition to presenting results of operations and earnings amounts in total, we present certain information in cents per share. These amounts reflect factors that directly affect Ameren’s earnings. We believe this per share information helps readers to understand the impact of these factors on Ameren’s earnings per share. All references in this report to earnings per share are based on average diluted common shares outstanding for the relevant period.
OVERVIEW
Ameren’s strategic plan includes investing in, and operating its utilities in, a manner consistent with existing regulatory frameworks, enhancing those frameworks, and advocating for responsible energy and economic policies, as well as creating and capitalizing
on opportunities for investment for the benefit of its customers and shareholders. Ameren remains focused on disciplined cost management and strategic capital allocation. As discussed below, Ameren successfully executed on its strategic plan in 2018, with constructive outcomes received in various regulatory proceedings. With the enactment of legislation in Missouri, we believe constructive regulatory frameworks for investment exist at all of Ameren's utility businesses. In February 2019, Ameren Missouri announced its Smart Energy Plan to upgrade the electric grid and accommodate more renewable energy. In addition, Ameren Missouri advanced its transition of generation to a cleaner, more diverse portfolio by entering into two build-transfer agreements for the acquisition of up to 557 megawatts of wind generation in Missouri.
In 2018, Ameren’s utility businesses each received orders to reduce customer rates to reflect the benefits
of a lower federal tax rate and, over time, to reflect the return of excess deferred taxes of over $2 billion. The return of excess deferred taxes to customers reduces operating cash flows but is expected to increase the rate base on which customer rates are established.
In June 2018, legislation was enacted in Missouri that enhanced Ameren Missouri’s electric regulatory framework. Pursuant to its PISA election, Ameren Missouri is permitted to defer and recover 85% of the depreciation expense and a weighted-average cost of capital return on rate base on certain property, plant, and equipment placed in service after September 1, 2018, and not included in base rates. Accumulated PISA deferrals earn carrying costs at the weighted-average cost of capital, and all approved
PISA deferrals will be added to rate base prospectively and recovered over a period of 20 years following a regulatory rate review. PISA mitigates the impacts of regulatory lag between regulatory rate reviews. The remaining 15% of certain property, plant, and equipment placed in service and not eligible for recovery under PISA, unless eligible for recovery under the RESRAM, remain subject to regulatory lag. As a result of the PISA election, additional provisions of the new law apply to Ameren Missouri, including limitations on electric customer rate increases and an electric base rate freeze until April 2020. Both the rate increase limitation and PISA are effective through December 2023, unless Ameren Missouri requests and receives MoPSC approval of an extension through December 2028. This Missouri law maintains
strong MoPSC oversight and consumer protections while supporting Ameren Missouri’s ability to strengthen and modernize Missouri’s electric grid.
In the second quarter of 2018, Ameren Missouri entered into a build-transfer agreement with a subsidiary of Terra-Gen, LLC to acquire, after construction, a 400-megawatt wind generation facility, which is expected to be located in northeastern Missouri. In October 2018, the MoPSC issued an order approving a unanimous stipulation and agreement regarding a requested certificate of convenience and necessity for the facility. In December 2018, Ameren
Missouri received FERC approval to acquire the facility after construction. A transmission interconnection agreement with the MISO for this facility is expected in the fall of 2019. Also, in October 2018, Ameren Missouri entered into a build-transfer agreement with a subsidiary of EDF Renewables, Inc. to acquire, after construction, a wind generation facility of up to 157 megawatts. In February 2019, Ameren Missouri filed with the MoPSC a nonunanimous stipulation and agreement regarding a requested certificate of convenience and necessity for the facility. The up to 157-megawatt facility is expected to be located in northwestern Missouri. A transmission interconnection agreement with the MISO for this facility is expected in early 2020. Both facilities are expected to be completed by the end of 2020 and would help Ameren Missouri comply with the Missouri renewable energy standard.
Each acquisition is subject to certain conditions, including entering into a MISO transmission interconnection agreement at an acceptable cost for each facility and obtaining FERC approval and the issuance of a certificate of convenience and necessity by the MoPSC for the up to 157-megawatt facility, as well as other customary contract terms and conditions. These agreements collectively represent approximately $1 billion in capital expenditures expected in 2020, which is included in Ameren Missouri’s Smart Energy Plan. As outlined in its 2017 IRP, Ameren Missouri is pursuing at least 700 megawatts of wind generation by the end of 2020. In October and December 2018, the MoPSC issued orders approving a RESRAM that allows Ameren Missouri to adjust customer rates on an annual basis without a traditional regulatory rate review. The RESRAM is designed to mitigate the impacts of regulatory
lag for the cost of compliance with renewable energy standards, including recovery of investments in wind and other renewable generation, by providing more timely recovery of costs and a return on investments not already provided for in customer rates or recovered under PISA.
In February 2019, Ameren Missouri announced its Smart Energy Plan, which includes a five-year capital investment overview with a detailed one-year plan for 2019, designed to upgrade Ameren Missouri's electric infrastructure. The plan includes investments that will upgrade the grid and accommodate more renewable energy. Investments under the plan are expected to total approximately $6.3 billion over the five-year period from 2019 through 2023, with costs largely recoverable under PISA and, for the portion of wind and other renewable generation investments that are not recoverable under PISA, recoverable under the RESRAM.
In
December 2018, the MoPSC issued an order approving Ameren Missouri’s MEEIA 2019 plan. The plan includes a portfolio of customer energy-efficiency programs through December 2021 and low-income customer energy-efficiency programs through December 2024, along with a regulatory recovery mechanism. Ameren Missouri intends to invest $226 million over the life of the plan, including $65 million per year through 2021. The plan includes the continued use of the MEEIA rider, which allows Ameren Missouri to collect from, or refund to, customers any difference in actual MEEIA program costs and related lost electric margins and the amounts collected from customers. In addition, the plan includes a performance incentive that provides Ameren Missouri an opportunity to earn additional revenues by achieving certain customer energy-efficiency goals, including $30 million
if 100% of the goals are achieved during the period ended December 2021. Additional revenues may be earned if Ameren Missouri exceeds 100% of its energy savings goals.
In April 2018, Ameren Illinois filed its annual electric distribution service formula rate update to establish the revenue requirement to be used for 2019 rates with the ICC. In November 2018, the ICC issued an order in Ameren Illinois’ annual update filing that approved a $72 million increase in Ameren Illinois’ electric distribution service rates beginning in January 2019.
In November 2018, the ICC issued an order approving a stipulation and agreement that resulted in an annual natural gas rate increase of $32 million, based on a 9.87% return on common equity, a capital structure composed of 50% common equity, and a rate base of $1.6 billion. This
increase reflects the reduction in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate enacted under the TCJA, as well as the increase in the Illinois corporate income tax rate that became effective in July 2017, which collectively decreased annual rates by approximately $17 million. The new customer rates were effective in November 2018. As a result of this order, the rate base under the QIP rider was reset to zero. Ameren Illinois used a 2019 future test year in this proceeding.
ATXI’s Spoon River project, located in northwest Illinois, was placed in service in February 2018. Construction of the Illinois Rivers project is substantially complete, with the last section awaiting the outcome of certain legal proceedings, which will delay the expected completion date to 2020. This delay is not expected to materially affect 2019 rate base or earnings. Construction activities for ATXI’s
Mark Twain project began in the second quarter of 2018, and the project is expected to be completed by the end of 2019.
In October 2018, Ameren’s board of directors increased the quarterly common stock dividend to 47.5 cents per share, resulting in an annualized equivalent dividend rate of $1.90 per share.
Earnings
Net income attributable to Ameren common shareholders was $815 million, or $3.32 per diluted share, for 2018, and $523 million, or $2.14 per diluted share, for 2017. Net income was favorably affected in 2018 compared with 2017 by the absence of a noncash
charge to earnings for the revaluation of deferred taxes, primarily at Ameren (parent) as a result of federal and Illinois tax law changes, and by increased demand at Ameren Missouri, primarily due to warmer summer and colder winter temperatures in 2018. Earnings were also
favorably affected in 2018 compared with 2017 by an increase in base rates and a reduction in operating expenses for net energy costs and other expenses subject to regulatory tracking mechanisms at Ameren Missouri pursuant to the MoPSC’s March 2017 electric rate order, by the absence of a Callaway energy center scheduled refueling and maintenance outage at Ameren Missouri, and by increased
investments in infrastructure at the Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution and Ameren Transmission segments. Net income was unfavorably affected in 2018, compared with 2017 by increased other operation and maintenance expenses not subject to riders or regulatory tracking mechanisms, primarily due to higher-than-normal energy center scheduled outage and electric distribution maintenance costs at Ameren Missouri, and by increased depreciation and amortization expenses at Ameren Missouri.
Liquidity
At December 31, 2018, Ameren, on a consolidated basis, had available liquidity in the form of cash on hand and amounts available under the Credit Agreements of $1.5 billion. In December 2018, the Credit Agreements were extended and now mature in December
2022.
Capital Expenditures
In 2018, Ameren continued to make significant investment in its utility businesses by making capital expenditures of $0.9 billion, $0.6 billion, $0.5 billion, and $0.3 billion in Ameren Missouri, Ameren Transmission, Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, and Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, respectively. For 2019 through 2023, Ameren’s cumulative capital expenditures are projected to range from $12.8 billion to $13.9 billion. The projected spending by
segment includes up to $7.1 billion, $2.7 billion, $2.5 billion, and $1.6 billion for Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Transmission, and Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, respectively, including approximately $1 billion to acquire two wind generation facilities in 2020 at Ameren Missouri.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our results of operations and financial position are affected by many factors. Economic conditions, energy-efficiency investments by our customers and by us, and the actions of key customers can significantly affect the demand for our services. Ameren and Ameren Missouri results are also affected
by seasonal fluctuations in winter heating and summer cooling demands, as well as by nuclear refueling and other energy center maintenance outages. Additionally, fluctuations in interest rates and conditions in the capital and credit markets affect our cost of borrowing and our pension and postretirement benefits costs. Almost all of Ameren’s revenues are subject to state or federal regulation. This regulation has a material impact on the prices we charge for our services. Our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity are affected by our ability to align our overall spending, both operating and capital, within the frameworks established by our regulators. Our 2018 revenues include a reduction from 2017 revenues for the pass-through to customers of reduced income taxes resulting from TCJA, which is substantially offset by a reduction in income tax expense.
Ameren Missouri principally uses coal and nuclear fuel
for fuel in its electric operations and purchases natural gas for its customers. Ameren Illinois purchases power and natural gas for its customers. The prices for these commodities can fluctuate significantly because of the global economic and political environment, weather, supply, demand, and many other factors. As described below, we have natural gas cost recovery mechanisms for our Illinois and Missouri natural gas distribution businesses, a purchased power cost recovery mechanism for Ameren Illinois’ electric distribution business, and a FAC for Ameren Missouri’s electric business.
Ameren Missouri’s electric service and natural gas distribution service rates are established in a traditional regulatory rate review based on a historical test year and an allowed return on equity. To mitigate the effects of regulatory lag, Ameren Missouri has recovery mechanisms in place for certain costs that allow customer rates to be adjusted
without a traditional regulatory rate review. Ameren Missouri’s FAC cost recovery mechanism allows it to recover or refund, through customer rates, 95% of the variance in net energy costs from the amount set in base rates without a traditional regulatory rate review, subject to MoPSC prudence reviews, with the remaining 5% of changes retained by Ameren Missouri. Net recovery of these costs through customer rates does not affect Ameren Missouri’s electric margins, as any change in revenue is offset by a corresponding change in fuel expense. In addition, Ameren Missouri’s MEEIA customer energy-efficiency program costs, the related lost electric margins, and any performance incentive are recoverable through the MEEIA cost recovery mechanism without a traditional regulatory rate review. Ameren Missouri also has a cost recovery mechanism for natural gas purchased on behalf of its customers. These pass-through purchased gas costs do not affect Ameren Missouri’s natural gas
margins, as any change in costs is offset by a corresponding change in revenues. Ameren Missouri employs other cost recovery mechanisms, including a pension and postretirement benefit cost tracker, an uncertain tax position tracker, a tracker on certain excess deferred taxes, a renewable energy standards cost tracker, and a solar rebate program tracker. Each of these trackers allows Ameren Missouri to defer the difference between actual costs incurred and costs included in customer rates as a regulatory asset or regulatory liability. The difference will be reflected in base rates in a subsequent MoPSC rate order. Pursuant to its PISA election, Ameren Missouri is permitted to defer and recover 85% of the depreciation expense and a weighted-average cost of capital return on rate base on certain property, plant, and equipment placed in service after September 1,
2018, and not included in base rates. Additionally, under the RESRAM, Ameren Missouri is permitted to recover the 15% of renewable generation plant placed in service not recovered under PISA. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of this report for information regarding Ameren Missouri’s PISA election and the RESRAM.
Ameren Illinois’ electric distribution service rates are reconciled annually to its actual revenue requirement and allowed return on equity, under a formula ratemaking process effective through 2022. If a given year’s revenue requirement varies
from the amount collected from customers, an adjustment is made to electric operating revenues with an offset to a regulatory asset or liability to reflect that year’s actual revenue requirement, independent of actual sales volumes. The regulatory balance is then collected from, or refunded to, customers within two years. In addition, Ameren Illinois’ electric customer energy-efficiency rider provides Ameren Illinois’ electric distribution service business with recovery of, and return on, energy-efficiency investments. Under formula ratemaking for both its electric distribution service and its electric energy-efficiency investments, the revenue requirements are based on recoverable costs, year-end rate base, a capital structure of 50% common equity, and a return on equity. The return on equity component is equal to the annual average of the monthly yields of the 30-year United States Treasury bonds plus 580 basis points. Therefore, Ameren Illinois’ annual return on equity
for its electric distribution business is directly correlated to the yields on such bonds.
Ameren Illinois’ natural gas distribution service rates are established in a traditional regulatory rate review based on a future test year and allowed return on equity. Ameren Illinois employs a VBA to ensure recoverability of the natural gas distribution service revenue requirement for residential and small nonresidential customers that is dependent on sales volumes. For these rate classes, the VBA allows Ameren Illinois to adjust natural gas distribution service rates without a traditional regulatory rate review when changes occur in sales volumes from normalized sales volumes approved by the ICC in a previous regulatory rate review. In addition, the QIP rider provides Ameren Illinois’ natural gas business with recovery of, and a return on, qualifying infrastructure plant investments that
are placed in service between regulatory rate reviews.
Ameren Illinois also has recovery mechanisms in place for certain costs that allow customer rates to be adjusted without a traditional regulatory rate review. Ameren Illinois’ electric distribution service business has cost recovery mechanisms for power purchased and transmission services incurred on behalf of its customers, renewable energy credit compliance, and zero emission credits. Ameren Illinois’ natural gas business has a cost recovery mechanism for natural gas purchased on behalf of its customers. These pass-through costs do not affect Ameren Illinois’ electric or natural gas margins, as any change in costs is offset by a corresponding change in revenues. Ameren Illinois employs other cost recovery mechanisms for natural gas customer energy-efficiency program costs and certain environmental costs, as well as bad debt expenses and costs of certain asbestos-related
claims not recovered in base rates.
FERC’s electric transmission formula rate framework provides for an annual reconciliation of the electric transmission service revenue requirement, which reflects the actual recoverable costs incurred and the 13-month average rate base for a given year, with the revenue requirement in customer rates, including an allowed return on equity. Ameren Illinois and ATXI use a company-specific, forward-looking formula ratemaking framework in setting their transmission rates. These rates are updated each January with forecasted information. If a given year’s revenue requirement varies from the amount collected from customers, an adjustment is made to electric operating revenues with an offset to a regulatory asset or liability to reflect that year’s actual revenue requirement. The regulatory balance is collected from, or refunded to, customers within two years. The total return on equity currently
allowed for Ameren Illinois’ and ATXI’s electric transmission service businesses is 10.82% and is subject to a FERC complaint case. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional information.
We employ various risk management strategies to reduce our exposure to commodity risk and other risks inherent in our business. The reliability of Ameren Missouri's energy centers and our transmission and distribution systems and the level and timing of operations and maintenance costs and capital investment are key factors that we seek to manage in order to optimize our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Earnings Summary
The following table presents a summary of Ameren’s earnings for the years ended December 31,
2018, 2017, and 2016:
2018
2017
2016
Net income
attributable to Ameren common shareholders
$
815
$
523
$
653
Earnings per common share – diluted
3.32
2.14
2.68
2018
versus 2017
Net income attributable to Ameren common shareholders in 2018 increased $292 million, or $1.18 per diluted share, from 2017. The increase was due to net income increases of $155 million, $24 million, $10 million, and $5 million at Ameren Missouri, Ameren Transmission, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, respectively. Additionally, the net loss for activity not reported as part of a segment, primarily at Ameren (parent), decreased $98 million.
Compared with 2017, 2018 earnings per share were favorably affected by:
•
the
absence of a noncash charge to earnings, primarily at Ameren (parent), for the revaluation of deferred taxes recorded in 2017, as a
result of a decrease in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate under the TCJA and an increase in the Illinois corporate income tax rate, partially offset by a noncash charge for updates to the revaluation of deferred taxes recorded in 2018 (64 cents per share);
•
increased demand in 2018 at
Ameren Missouri, primarily due to warmer summer and colder winter temperatures in 2018 (estimated at 42 cents per share);
•
increased base rates and reduced operating expenses for net energy costs and other expenses subject to regulatory tracking mechanisms at Ameren Missouri, pursuant to the MoPSC’s March 2017 electric rate order (9 cents per share);
•
the absence of a Callaway energy center scheduled refueling and maintenance outage in 2018, which last occurred in the fourth quarter of 2017, partially offset by preparation
costs incurred in 2018 for the 2019 scheduled refueling outage (9 cents per share);
•
increased Ameren Transmission earnings under formula ratemaking, primarily due to additional investment (8 cents per share);
•
increased Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution earnings under formula ratemaking, primarily due to additional investment and a higher return on equity (5 cents per share);
•
increased
Ameren Illinois Natural Gas earnings from investments in qualifying infrastructure recovered under the QIP rider and increased base rates pursuant to the ICC’s November 2018 gas rate order (5 cents per share);
•
decreased property taxes at Ameren Missouri due to lower assessed property values (5 cents per share);
•
decreased financing costs, primarily at Ameren Missouri, due to lower interest rates and higher levels of the allowance for funds used during construction (3 cents per share); and
•
the
recognition of a MEEIA 2016 performance incentive in 2018 at Ameren Missouri (3 cents per share).
Compared with 2017, 2018 earnings per share were unfavorably affected by:
•
increased other operation and maintenance expenses not subject to riders or regulatory tracking mechanisms, primarily due to higher-than-normal energy center scheduled outage and electric distribution maintenance costs at Ameren Missouri (19 cents per share) and due to changes in the market value of company-owned life insurance (7 cents per share);
•
increased
donations at Ameren (parent) and Ameren Missouri (8 cents per share);
•
increased depreciation and amortization expenses not subject to riders or regulatory tracking mechanisms, primarily at Ameren Missouri, resulting from additional electric property, plant, and equipment (7 cents per share); and
•
the dilutive effect of issuing common stock (2 cents per share).
The cents per share information presented is based on the weighted-average basic shares outstanding
in 2017 and does not reflect any change in earnings per share resulting from dilution, unless otherwise noted. Amounts other than variances related to income taxes have been presented net of income taxes using Ameren’s 2018 statutory tax rate of 27%.
2017 versus 2016
Net income attributable to Ameren common shareholders in 2017 decreased $130 million, or $0.54 per diluted share, from 2016. The decrease was due to an increase in net loss of $125 million for activity not reported as part of a segment, primarily at Ameren (parent), and a net income decrease of $34 million at Ameren Missouri, both of which were primarily due to the enactment of the TCJA. The decrease was partially offset by a $23 million and a $5 million increase in net income from Ameren Transmission and Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, respectively.
Compared
with 2016, 2017 earnings per share were unfavorably affected by:
•
an increase in income tax expense, primarily at Ameren (parent), due to the revaluation of deferred taxes, as a result of a decrease in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate due to enactment of the TCJA (63 cents per share) and an increase in the Illinois corporate income tax rate (6 cents per share);
•
decreased demand primarily at Ameren Missouri due to milder winter and summer temperatures in 2017 (estimated at 15 cents per share);
•
the
absence in 2017 of a MEEIA 2013 performance incentive at Ameren Missouri recognized in 2016 (7 cents per share);
•
increased depreciation and amortization expenses not subject to riders or regulatory tracking mechanisms at Ameren Missouri resulting from additional electric property, plant, and equipment (6 cents per share); and
•
increased transmission services charges at Ameren Missouri resulting from cost-sharing by all MISO participants of additional MISO-approved electric transmission investments made by other entities
(2 cents per share).
Compared with 2016, 2017 earnings per share were favorably affected by:
•
an increase in base rates, net of increased revenues in 2016 from the suspension of operations at the New Madrid Smelter, and reduced operating expenses for net energy costs and other expenses subject to regulatory tracking mechanisms at Ameren Missouri pursuant to the MoPSC’s March 2017 electric rate order (32 cents per share);
•
increased Ameren Transmission earnings under formula
ratemaking, primarily due to additional investment, partially offset by a lower recognized return on equity (9 cents per share);
increased Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution earnings under formula ratemaking, primarily due to additional investment and a higher recognized return on equity (4 cents per share); and
•
decreased
income tax expense, excluding the effect of corporate income tax rate changes discussed above, primarily at Ameren (parent) resulting from changes in the valuation allowance for charitable contributions, tax benefits related to company-owned life insurance, and tax credits in 2017, partially offset by a lower income tax benefit in 2017 related to stock-based compensation compared with 2016 (1 cent per share).
The cents per share information presented is based on the weighted-average basic shares outstanding in 2016 and does not reflect any change in earnings per share resulting from dilution, unless otherwise noted. Amounts other than variances related to income taxes have been presented net of income taxes using Ameren’s 2017 statutory tax rate of 39%.
For additional details regarding the Ameren Companies’ results of
operations, including explanations of Electric and Natural Gas Margins, Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses, Depreciation and Amortization, Taxes Other Than Income Taxes, Other Income, Net, Interest Charges, and Income Taxes, see the major headings below.
Below is Ameren’s table of income statement components by segment for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
The following table presents the favorable (unfavorable) variations by segment for electric and natural gas margins in 2018 compared with 2017, as well as 2017 compared with 2016. We consider electric and natural gas margins useful measures to analyze the change in profitability of our electric and natural gas operations between periods. We have included the analysis below as a complement to the financial information we provide in accordance with GAAP. However, these margins may not be a presentation defined under GAAP, and they may not be comparable to other companies’ presentations or more useful than the GAAP information we provide elsewhere in this report.
Electric
and Natural Gas Margins
2018 versus 2017
Ameren Missouri
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution
Ameren
Illinois Natural Gas
Ameren Transmission(a)
Other / Intersegment Eliminations
Ameren
Electric
revenue change:
Effect of weather (estimate)(b)
$
157
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
157
Base
rates, including effects of TCJA (estimate)(c)
(113
)
(23
)
—
7
—
(129
)
Recovery
of power restoration efforts provided to other utilities
5
8
—
—
—
13
Sales
volume (excluding the estimated effects of weather and MEEIA)
21
—
—
—
—
21
Off-system
sales and capacity revenues
(110
)
—
—
—
—
(110
)
MEEIA
2016 performance incentive
11
—
—
—
—
11
Energy-efficiency
program investments
—
13
—
—
—
13
Other
6
2
—
—
6
14
Cost
recovery mechanisms – offset in fuel and purchased power(d)
33
19
—
—
—
52
Other
cost recovery mechanisms(e)
30
(40
)
—
—
—
(10
)
Total
electric revenue change
$
40
$
(21
)
$
—
$
7
$
6
$
32
Fuel
and purchased power change:
Energy costs (excluding the estimated effect of weather)
$
109
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
109
Effect
of weather (estimate)(b)
(34
)
—
—
—
—
(34
)
Effect
of lower net energy costs included in base rates
9
—
—
—
—
9
Other
(2
)
(4
)
—
—
(1
)
(7
)
Cost
recovery mechanisms – offset in electric revenue(d)
(33
)
(19
)
—
—
—
(52
)
Total
fuel and purchased power change
$
49
$
(23
)
$
—
$
—
$
(1
)
$
25
Net
change in electric margins
$
89
$
(44
)
$
—
$
7
$
5
$
57
Natural
gas revenue change:
Effect of weather (estimate)(b)
$
19
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
19
Base
rates, including effects of TCJA (estimate)
—
—
(6
)
—
—
(6
)
QIP
rider
—
—
13
—
—
13
Other
—
—
2
—
1
3
Cost
recovery mechanisms – offset in natural gas purchased for resale(d)
(7
)
—
54
—
—
47
Other
cost recovery mechanisms(e)
—
—
9
—
—
9
Total
natural gas revenue change
$
12
$
—
$
72
$
—
$
1
$
85
Natural
gas purchased for resale change:
Effect of weather (estimate)(b)
$
(16
)
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
(16
)
Cost
recovery mechanisms – offset in natural gas revenue(d)
Recovery
of power restoration efforts provided to other utilities
7
1
—
—
—
8
Sales
volume (excluding the estimated effects of weather and MEEIA)
(6
)
—
—
—
—
(6
)
Off-system
sales and capacity revenues
22
—
—
—
—
22
MEEIA
2013 performance incentive
(28
)
—
—
—
—
(28
)
Transmission
services revenues
11
—
—
—
—
11
Other
—
—
—
—
5
5
Cost
recovery mechanisms – offset in fuel and purchased power(d)
(11
)
18
—
—
—
7
Other
cost recovery mechanisms(e)
24
(36
)
—
—
—
(12
)
Total
electric revenue change
$
15
$
20
$
—
$
71
$
5
$
111
Fuel
and purchased power change:
Energy costs (excluding the estimated effect of weather)
$
(22
)
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
(22
)
Effect
of weather (estimate)(b)
13
(1
)
—
—
—
12
Effect
of lower net energy costs included in base rates
39
—
—
—
—
39
Transmission
services charges
(16
)
—
—
—
—
(16
)
Other
(8
)
4
—
—
(9
)
(13
)
Cost
recovery mechanisms – offset in electric revenue(d)
11
(18
)
—
—
—
(7
)
Total
fuel and purchased power change
$
17
$
(15
)
$
—
$
—
$
(9
)
$
(7
)
Net
change in electric margins
$
32
$
5
$
—
$
71
$
(4
)
$
104
Natural
gas revenue change:
Effect of weather (estimate)(b)
$
(4
)
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
(4
)
QIP
rider
—
—
12
—
—
12
Other
—
—
(3
)
—
—
(3
)
Cost
recovery mechanisms – offset in natural gas purchased for resale(d)
2
—
(28
)
—
—
(26
)
Other
cost recovery mechanisms(e)
—
—
8
—
—
8
Total
natural gas revenue change
$
(2
)
$
—
$
(11
)
$
—
$
—
$
(13
)
Natural
gas purchased for resale change:
Effect of weather (estimate)(b)
$
4
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
4
Cost
recovery mechanisms – offset in natural gas revenue(d)
(2
)
—
28
—
—
26
Total
natural gas purchased for resale change
$
2
$
—
$
28
$
—
$
—
$
30
Net
change in natural gas margins
$
—
$
—
$
17
$
—
$
—
$
17
(a)
Includes
an increase in transmission margins of $9 million and $26 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively, at Ameren Illinois.
(b)
Represents the estimated variation resulting primarily from changes in cooling and heating degree-days on electric and natural gas demand compared with the prior year; this variation is based on temperature readings from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration weather stations at local airports in our service territories.
(c)
For Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution and Ameren Transmission,
base rates include increases or decreases to operating revenues related to the revenue requirement reconciliation adjustment under formula rates.
(d)
Electric and natural gas revenue changes are offset by corresponding changes in “Fuel,”“Purchased power,” and “Natural gas purchased for resale” on the statement of income, resulting in no change to electric and natural gas margins.
(e)
Offsetting increases or decreases to expenses are reflected in “Operating Expenses – Other operations and maintenance”
or in “Operating Expenses – Taxes other than income taxes” on the statement of income. These items have no overall impact on earnings.
2018 versus 2017
Ameren
Ameren’s electric margins increased $57 million, or 1%, in 2018 compared with 2017, primarily because of increased margins at Ameren Missouri partially offset by decreased margins at Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution. Ameren’s natural gas margins increased $22 million, or 4%, in 2018 compared with 2017, primarily because of increased margins at Ameren Illinois Natural Gas.
Ameren Transmission
Ameren
Transmission’s margins increased $7 million, or 2%, in 2018 compared with 2017. Margins were favorably affected by increased capital investment, as evidenced by a 13% increase in rate base used to calculate the revenue requirement in 2018 compared with 2017. Margins were unfavorably affected by the reduction in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate, which decreased revenues $54 million in 2018 compared with 2017.
Ameren Missouri’s electric margins increased $89 million,
or 4%, in 2018 compared with 2017. Ameren Missouri’s natural gas margins increased $3 million, or 4%, in 2018 compared with 2017 primarily due to colder winter temperatures, as discussed below.
The following items had a favorable effect on Ameren Missouri’s electric margins in 2018 compared with 2017:
•
Summer temperatures were warmer as cooling degree days increased 11% in 2018 compared with 2017 and winter temperatures were colder as heating degree days increased 34% in 2018 compared with 2017. The effect of weather increased margins by an estimated $123 million.
The change in margins due to weather is the sum of the effect of weather (estimate) on electric revenues (+$157 million) and the effect of weather (estimate) on fuel and purchased power (-$34 million) in the table above.
•
Revenues from other cost recovery mechanisms due to MEEIA customer energy-efficiency program costs and gross receipts taxes, which increased margins $30 million. See Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses in this section for the related offsetting increase in MEEIA customer energy-efficiency program costs and Taxes Other Than Income Taxes in this section for the related offsetting increase
in gross receipts taxes.
•
Excluding the estimated effects of weather and the MEEIA 2016 customer energy-efficiency programs, total retail sales volumes increased 1%, which increased revenues by an estimated $21 million, primarily due to growth. While MEEIA 2016 customer energy-efficiency programs reduced retail sales volumes, the recovery of lost electric margins ensured that electric margins were not affected.
•
The MEEIA 2016 performance incentive, which increased revenues
$11 million. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of this report for information regarding the MEEIA 2016 performance incentive.
•
An increase in power restoration assistance provided to other utilities and the associated recovery of labor and benefit costs for crews supporting those efforts, which increased revenues $5 million.
The following items had an unfavorable effect on Ameren Missouri’s electric margins in 2018 compared with 2017:
•
Lower
electric base rates in accordance with the TCJA provisions in Missouri Senate Bill 564, partially offset by higher electric base rates, as a result of the March 2017 electric rate order. These items collectively decreased margins by an estimated $104 million in 2018 compared with 2017. The net change in electric base rates is the sum of the change in base rates (estimate) (-$113 million) and the effect of lower net energy costs included in base rates (+$9 million) in the table above.
•
An increase in net energy costs as a result of increased sales volumes discussed above, partially offset by the 5% Ameren Missouri retains for the variance in net energy
costs from the amount set in base rates, primarily as a result of lower fuel costs in 2018 compared with 2017, which collectively decreased margins $1 million. The change in net energy costs is the sum of the effect of revenue change in off-system sales and capacity revenues (-$110 million) and the effect of the change in energy costs (excluding the estimated effect of weather) (+$109 million) in the table above.
Ameren Illinois
Ameren Illinois’ electric margins decreased $35 million, or 3%, in 2018 compared with 2017 driven by decreased margins at Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution (-$44 million), partially offset by increased margins
at Ameren Illinois Transmission (+$9 million). Ameren Illinois Natural Gas’ margins increased $18 million, or 4%, in 2018 compared with 2017.
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution’s margins decreased $44 million, or 4%, in 2018 compared with 2017. The following items had an unfavorable effect on Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution’s margins in 2018 compared with 2017:
•
Revenues from other cost recovery mechanisms, primarily due to a decrease in recoverable
customer energy-efficiency program costs prior to the FEJA, which decreased margins $40 million. See Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses in this section for the related offsetting decrease in customer energy-efficiency program costs prior to the FEJA.
•
Revenues decreased due to lower recoverable expenses in 2018 compared with 2017 under formula ratemaking, partially offset by an increase in rate base of 8% and a higher recognized return on common equity due to an increase in the 30-year United States Treasury bond yields of 22 basis points, which collectively decreased margins $23 million. The reduction in the federal statutory corporate income
tax rate decreased recoverable expenses $52 million.
The following items had a favorable effect on Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution’s margins in 2018 compared with 2017:
•
Revenues increased $13 million due to energy-efficiency program investments pursuant to the FEJA.
•
An increase in power restoration assistance provided to other utilities and the associated recovery of labor and benefit costs for crews supporting those efforts,
which increased revenues $8 million.
Ameren Illinois Natural Gas’ margins increased $18 million, or 4%, in 2018 compared with 2017. The following items had a favorable effect on Ameren Illinois Natural Gas’ margins:
•
Revenues
from QIP recoveries, which increased margins $13 million due to additional investment in qualified natural gas infrastructure.
•
Revenues from other cost recovery mechanisms, which increased margins $9 million.
Ameren Illinois Natural Gas’ margins were unfavorably affected by the reduction in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate, partially offset by higher natural gas base rates, as a result of the November 2018 natural gas rate order. These items collectively decreased margins by an estimated $6 million, in 2018 compared with 2017.
Ameren
Illinois Transmission
Ameren Illinois Transmission’s margins increased $9 million, or 3%, in 2018 compared with 2017. Margins were favorably affected by increased capital investment, as evidenced by an 18% increase in rate base used to calculate the revenue requirement in 2018 compared with 2017. Margins were unfavorably affected by the reduction in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate, which decreased revenues $32 million, in 2018 compared with 2017.
2017 versus 2016
Ameren
Ameren’s electric margins increased $104 million, or 3%, in 2017 compared with 2016 primarily because of increased margins at Ameren Transmission and Ameren Missouri. Ameren’s natural gas margins increased
$17 million, or 3%, in 2017 compared with 2016 because of increased margins at Ameren Illinois Natural Gas.
Ameren Transmission
Ameren Transmission’s margins increased $71 million, or 20%, in 2017 compared with 2016. Margins were favorably affected by increased capital investment, as evidenced by a 23% increase in rate base used to calculate the revenue requirement in 2017 compared with 2016, as well as higher recoverable costs in 2017 compared with 2016 under forward-looking formula ratemaking. Margins were unfavorably affected by the absence in 2017 of a temporarily higher allowed return on common equity of 12.38% for nearly four months in 2016 as a result of the expiration of the refund period in the February 2015 FERC complaint case. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II,
Item 8, of this report for information regarding the allowed return on common equity for FERC-regulated transmission rate base.
Ameren Missouri
Ameren Missouri’s electric margins increased $32 million, or 1%, in 2017 compared with 2016. Ameren Missouri’s natural gas margins were comparable between years.
The following items had a favorable effect on Ameren Missouri’s electric margins in 2017 compared with 2016:
•
Higher electric base rates, effective April 1, 2017, as a result of the March 2017 MoPSC electric rate order, which increased
margins by an estimated $100 million. The change in electric base rates is the sum of the change in base rates (estimate) (+$61 million) and the effect of lower net energy costs included in base rates (+$39 million) in the table above. Higher electric base rates incorporated the effect of the suspension of operations at the New Madrid Smelter.
•
Revenues from other cost recovery mechanisms, primarily due to MEEIA customer energy-efficiency program costs, which increased margins $24 million. See Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses in this section for the related offsetting increase in MEEIA customer energy-efficiency
program costs.
•
Increased transmission services revenues due to additional rate base investment, which increased margins $11 million.
•
An increase in power restoration assistance provided to other utilities and the associated recovery of labor and benefit costs for crews supporting those efforts, which increased revenues $7 million.
The following items had an unfavorable
effect on Ameren Missouri’s electric margins in 2017 compared with 2016:
•
Summer temperatures were milder in 2017 compared with 2016, as cooling degree days decreased 10%. The effect of weather decreased margins by an estimated $52 million. The change in margins due to weather is the sum of the effect of weather (estimate) on electric revenues (-$65 million) and the effect of weather (estimate) on fuel and purchased power (+$13 million) in the table above.
•
The
absence of the MEEIA 2013 performance incentive, which decreased margins $28 million. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of this report for information regarding the MEEIA 2013 performance incentive.
Increased transmission services charges resulting from cost-sharing by all MISO participants of additional MISO-approved electric transmission investments made by other entities, which decreased margins
$16 million.
•
Excluding the estimated effects of weather and the MEEIA 2016 customer energy-efficiency programs, total retail sales volumes decreased less than 1%, which decreased revenues by an estimated $6 million. Lower sales volumes were due, in part, to the absence of the leap year benefit experienced in 2016, partially offset by growth. While MEEIA 2016 customer energy-efficiency programs reduced retail sales volumes, the recovery of lost electric margins ensured that electric margins were not affected.
Ameren Illinois
Ameren Illinois’ electric
margins increased $31 million, or 2%, in 2017 compared with 2016 driven by increases in Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution (+$5 million) and Ameren Illinois Transmission (+$26 million) margins. Ameren Illinois Natural Gas’ margins increased $17 million, or 4%, in 2017 compared with 2016 primarily due to increased QIP rider recoveries, which increased margins $12 million.
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution’s margins increased $5 million, or less than 1%, in 2017 compared with 2016. Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution’s margins were favorably affected by an increase in rate base of 6% in 2017 compared with 2016
and a higher return on common equity due to an increase in the 30-year United States Treasury bond yields of 29 basis points in 2017 compared with 2016, as well as higher recoverable expenses under formula ratemaking pursuant to the IEIMA, which collectively increased margins $42 million.
The following items had an unfavorable effect on Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution’s margins in 2017 compared with 2016:
•
Revenues from other cost recovery mechanisms, primarily due to a decrease in recoverable customer energy-efficiency program costs prior to the FEJA, which decreased margins $36 million. See Other Operations and Maintenance
Expenses in this section for the related offsetting decrease in customer energy-efficiency program costs prior to the FEJA.
•
The absence of the impact of warmer-than-normal summer temperatures experienced in 2016, which decreased margins by an estimated $6 million. Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution revenues were decoupled from sales volumes beginning in 2017. The change in margins due to weather is the sum of the effect of weather (estimate) on electric revenues (-$5 million) and the effect of weather (estimate) on fuel and purchased power (-$1 million) in the table above.
Ameren Illinois
Transmission
Ameren Illinois Transmission’s margins increased $26 million, or 11%, in 2017 compared with 2016. Margins were favorably affected by increased capital investment, as evidenced by a 16% increase in rate base used to calculate the revenue requirement and higher recoverable costs in 2017 compared with 2016 under forward-looking formula ratemaking. Margins were unfavorably affected by the absence in 2017 of a temporarily higher allowed return on common equity of 12.38% for nearly four months in 2016 as a result of the expiration of the refund period in the February 2015 FERC complaint case.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
2018 versus 2017
Ameren
Other
operations and maintenance expenses were $67 million higher in 2018 compared with 2017. In addition to changes by segment discussed below, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $20 million in 2018 for activity not reported as part of a segment, primarily because of a decrease in intersegment eliminations.
Ameren Transmission
Other operations and maintenance expenses were comparable between 2018 and 2017.
Ameren Missouri
Other operations and maintenance expenses were
$47 million higher in 2018 compared with 2017. The following items increased other operations and maintenance expenses between years:
•
Nonnuclear energy center operations and maintenance costs increased $31 million, primarily because of higher-than-normal scheduled outage costs and an increase in routine maintenance work.
•
MEEIA customer energy-efficiency program costs increased $20 million.
Distribution maintenance expenditures increased $20 million, primarily due to increased reliability work, including vegetation management work and inspections, and increased system repairs and maintenance costs.
•
Labor and employee benefit costs increased $14 million, primarily because of an unrealized MTM loss in 2018 compared with a MTM gain in 2017 resulting from changes in the market value of company-owned life insurance and an increase in power restoration assistance provided to other utilities.
The
above increases were partially offset by a $29 million reduction in Callaway energy center refueling and maintenance outage costs. There was no Callaway refueling and maintenance outage in 2018; however, $6 million in preparation costs were incurred in 2018 for the 2019 scheduled outage.
Ameren Illinois
Other operations and maintenance expenses were comparable at Ameren Illinois and Ameren Illinois Transmission between 2018 and 2017.
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution
Other operations and maintenance expenses were $13 million lower in 2018 compared with 2017, primarily
because of a $36 million decrease in customer energy-efficiency costs prior to the FEJA and a $3 million decrease in environmental remediation costs. These decreases were partially offset by a $21 million increase in labor and employee benefit costs, primarily because of an unrealized MTM loss in 2018 compared with a MTM gain in 2017 resulting from changes in the market value of company-owned life insurance and an increase in power restoration assistance provided to other utilities. Additionally, amortization of regulatory assets associated with the FEJA energy-efficiency program increased $9 million.
Ameren Illinois Natural Gas
Other operations and maintenance expenses were $14 million higher in 2018 compared with 2017, primarily because of increased
operations and compliance expenditures related to pipeline integrity, higher bad debt expense, and increased customer energy-efficiency program costs.
2017 versus 2016
Ameren
Other operations and maintenance expenses decreased $28 million in 2017 compared with 2016. In addition to changes by segment discussed below, other operations and maintenance expenses decreased $14 million in 2017 for activity not reported as part of a segment, primarily because of an increase in intersegment eliminations.
Ameren Transmission
Other operations
and maintenance expenses were comparable between 2017 and 2016.
Ameren Missouri
Other operations and maintenance expenses were $13 million higher in 2017 compared with 2016. The following items increased other operations and maintenance expenses between years:
•
MEEIA customer energy-efficiency program costs increased $22 million.
•
Nonnuclear
energy center operations and maintenance costs increased $3 million, primarily due to higher coal handling charges.
The following items decreased other operations and maintenance expenses between years:
•
Labor and employee benefit costs decreased $6 million, primarily due to a reduction in the base level of pension and postretirement expenses allowed in rates as a result of the March 2017 MoPSC electric rate order along with changes in the market value of company-owned life insurance, partially offset by higher labor costs resulting from increased power restoration assistance provided to other utilities and higher wages.
•
Solar
rebate costs decreased $8 million, primarily as a result of the March 2017 MoPSC electric rate order.
Ameren Illinois
Other operations and maintenance expenses decreased $29 million in 2017 compared with 2016, as discussed below. Other operations and maintenance expenses were comparable at Ameren Illinois Transmission between 2017 and 2016.
Other
operations and maintenance expenses were $32 million lower in 2017 compared with 2016, primarily because of a $47 million decrease in customer energy-efficiency program costs and a $3 million decrease in labor and employee benefit costs, partially offset by an $11 million increase in environmental remediation costs.
Ameren Illinois Natural Gas
Other operations and maintenance expenses were $4 million higher in 2017 compared with 2016, primarily because of increases in bad debt expense, customer energy-efficiency program costs, and environmental remediation costs, partially offset by lower labor and employee benefit
costs.
Depreciation and Amortization
2018 versus 2017
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $59 million, $17 million, and $33 million in 2018 compared with 2017 at Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois, respectively, primarily because of additional property, plant, and equipment across their respective segments. Additionally, depreciation and amortization expenses were higher at Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution due to increased software amortization expenses.
2017
versus 2016
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $51 million, $19 million, and $22 million in 2017 compared with 2016 at Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois, respectively, primarily because of additional property, plant, and equipment across their respective segments.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
2018 versus 2017
Taxes other than income taxes increased $6 million in 2018 compared with 2017,
primarily because of higher gross receipts taxes at Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, partially offset by a decrease in property taxes at Ameren Missouri due to lower assessed property values. See Excise Taxes in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional information.
2017 versus 2016
Taxes other than income taxes increased $10 million in 2017 compared with 2016, primarily because of higher gross receipts taxes at Ameren Missouri and higher property taxes at Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution and Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, resulting from a refund for 2015 electric distribution taxes that was received in 2016.
Other
Income, Net
2018 versus 2017
Other income, net, increased $16 million in 2018 compared with 2017, primarily because of an increase in the non-service cost components of net periodic benefit income at Ameren Transmission and each of the Ameren Illinois segments, along with an increase in allowance for equity funds used during construction at Ameren Missouri, Ameren Transmission, and each of the Ameren Illinois segments, resulting from increased capital projects. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in Ameren Missouri’s non-service cost components of net periodic benefit income and increased donations at Ameren Missouri.
In addition to the changes
discussed above, Other income, net, decreased in 2018 compared with 2017, due to activity not reported as part of a segment, primarily as a result of increased donations at Ameren (parent), partially offset by an increase in the non-service cost components of net periodic benefit income.
See Note 6 – Other Income, Net under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional information. See Note 10 – Retirement Benefits under Part II, Item 8, of this report for more information on the non-service cost components of net periodic benefit income.
2017 versus 2016
Other income, net, decreased $15 million in 2017 compared
with 2016, primarily because of a decrease in the non-service cost
components of net periodic benefit income at Ameren Transmission and each of the Ameren Illinois segments, lower interest income associated with a lower IEIMA revenue requirement reconciliation regulatory asset balance at Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, and a decrease in allowance for equity funds used during construction, primarily at Ameren Missouri. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in Ameren Missouri’s non-service cost components of net periodic benefit income.
In addition
to the changes discussed above, Other income, net, increased in 2017 compared with 2016, due to activity not reported as part of a segment, primarily as a result of decreased donations at Ameren (parent).
Interest Charges
2018 versus 2017
Ameren
Interest charges increased $10 million in 2018 compared with 2017. Along with the changes discussed below, interest charges increased $7 million for activity not reported as part of a segment, primarily because of a decrease in intersegment
borrowings at Ameren Transmission.
Ameren Transmission
Interest charges increased $8 million, primarily because of higher average outstanding debt at Ameren Illinois Transmission and ATXI, partially offset by decreased affiliate borrowings at ATXI.
Ameren Missouri
Interest charges decreased $7 million, primarily because of a decrease in the average interest rate of long-term debt, partially offset by an increase in average outstanding debt.
Ameren Illinois
Interest charges increased $5 million across the Ameren Illinois segments, primarily because of an increase in average
outstanding debt, partially offset by a decrease in the average interest rate of long-term debt.
2017 versus 2016
Ameren
Interest charges increased $9 million in 2017 compared with 2016, as discussed below.
Ameren Transmission
Interest charges increased $9 million, primarily because of an increase in average outstanding debt at Ameren Illinois Transmission and ATXI.
Ameren Missouri
Interest charges decreased $4 million,
primarily because of a decrease in the average interest rate of long-term debt.
Ameren Illinois
Interest charges increased $4 million across the Ameren Illinois segments, primarily because of an increase in average outstanding debt, partially offset by a decrease in the average interest rate of long-term debt.
The following table presents effective income tax rates for the years ended December 31,
2018, 2017, and 2016:
2018
2017
2016
Ameren
22%
52%
(a)
37%
Ameren
Missouri
20%
44%
(b)
38%
Ameren Illinois
24%
38%
(c)
38%
Ameren
Illinois Electric Distribution
23%
38%
(c)
38%
Ameren Illinois Natural Gas
26%
38%
(c)
39%
Ameren
Illinois Transmission
24%
37%
(c)
38%
Ameren Transmission
25%
39%
(c)
39%
(a)
The
net impact of the revaluation of deferred income taxes as a result of the TCJA and the increase in the Illinois corporate income tax rate increased the effective income tax rate for 2017 by 15 percentage points.
(b)
The impact of the revaluation of deferred income taxes as a result of the TCJA increased the effective income tax rate for 2017 by 6 percentage points.
(c)
The net impact of the revaluation of deferred income taxes as a result of the TCJA and the increase in the Illinois corporate income tax rate had no
material effect on the effective income tax rate.
See Note 12 – Income Taxes under Part II, Item 8, of this report for information regarding reconciliations of effective income tax rates for Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois, as well as a discussion of the effect of the TCJA and the revaluation of deferred taxes in 2017. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of this report for information regarding reductions in revenues related to the lower federal statutory corporate income tax rate enacted under the TCJA and the return of excess deferred taxes to customers.
2018 versus 2017
Ameren
The effective income tax rate was lower in 2018 compared with 2017, primarily because of the decrease in the federal
statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, beginning in 2018, and revaluation of deferred taxes in 2017, resulting from both the enactment of the TCJA in 2017 and an increase in the Illinois corporate income tax rate in mid-2017. Additionally, the effective tax rate was lower due to amortization of excess deferred taxes in 2018. These items were offset by higher state income tax expense, as the increase in the Illinois corporate income tax rate in 2017 applied to the full year in 2018, and lower tax benefits related to company-owned life insurance in 2018.
Ameren Transmission
The effective income tax rate was lower in 2018 compared with 2017, primarily because of the decrease in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate, along with amortization of excess deferred taxes in 2018, partially offset by the increase in the Illinois corporate income tax rate applied to the
full year in 2018.
Ameren Missouri
The effective income tax rate was lower in 2018 compared with 2017, primarily because of the decrease in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate in 2018, amortization of excess deferred taxes in 2018, and revaluation of deferred taxes in 2017.
Ameren Illinois
The effective tax rate was lower in 2018 compared with 2017 at Ameren Illinois and its respective segments, primarily because of the decrease in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate and amortization of excess deferred taxes in 2018, partially offset by the increase in the Illinois corporate income tax rate applied to the full year in 2018.
2017 versus 2016
Ameren
The
effective income tax rate was higher in 2017 compared with 2016, primarily because of revaluation of deferred taxes due to enactment of the TCJA in 2017. In addition, income tax expense increased due to the revaluation of deferred taxes as a result of an increase in the Illinois income tax rate in 2017 and due to a decrease in the recognition of tax benefits associated with share-based compensation, resulting from the difference between the deduction for tax purposes and the compensation cost recognized for financial reporting purposes. These items were partially offset by a reduction in the valuation allowance related to charitable contributions, due to higher-than-expected current-year taxable income.
Ameren Transmission
The effective income tax rate was comparable between years.
The effective income tax rate was higher, primarily because of revaluation of deferred taxes due to the reduction in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate described above.
Ameren Illinois
The effective tax rate was comparable between years at Ameren Illinois and its respective segments.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Collections from our tariff-based revenues are our principal source of cash provided by operating activities. A diversified retail customer mix, primarily consisting of rate-regulated residential, commercial, and industrial customers, provides us with a reasonably
predictable source of cash. In addition to using cash provided by operating activities, we use available cash, borrowings under the Credit Agreements, commercial paper issuances, and/or, in the case of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois, other short-term affiliate borrowings to support normal operations and temporary capital requirements. We may reduce our short-term borrowings with cash provided by operations or, at our discretion, with long-term borrowings, or, in the case of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois, with capital contributions from Ameren (parent). In the near term, our operating cash flows will decrease due to the reduction in the federal statutory income tax rate enacted under the TCJA. The decrease in operating cash flows results from reduced customer rates, reflecting the tax rate decrease, without a corresponding reduction in income tax payments until about 2020 because of our use of net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. Additionally,
operating cash flows will be further reduced by lower customer rates, resulting from the return of excess deferred taxes. Over time, the decrease in operating cash flows will be offset as temporary differences between book and taxable income reverse, and by increased customer rates due to higher rate base amounts resulting from lower accumulated deferred income tax liabilities. We expect to make significant capital expenditures over the next five years as we invest in our electric and natural gas utility infrastructure to support overall system reliability, grid modernization, renewable energy requirements, environmental compliance, and other improvements. As part of its plan to fund these cash flow requirements, beginning in the first quarter of 2018, Ameren began using newly issued shares, rather than market-purchased shares, to satisfy requirements under the DRPlus and employee benefit plans and expects to continue to do so through at least 2023. Ameren
also plans to issue incremental common equity to fund a portion of Ameren Missouri’s wind generation investments. Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois expect their respective equity to total capitalization levels over the period ending December 2023 to remain in-line with their respective equity to total capitalization levels as of December 31, 2018.
The use of cash provided by operating activities and short-term borrowings to fund capital expenditures and other long-term investments may periodically result in a working capital deficit, defined as current liabilities exceeding current assets, as was the case at December 31, 2018, for the Ameren Companies. The working capital deficit as of December 31, 2018,
was primarily the result of current maturities of long-term debt and our decision to finance our businesses with lower-cost commercial paper issuances. With the credit capacity available under the Credit Agreements, along with cash and cash equivalents, Ameren had net available liquidity of $1.5 billion at December 31, 2018. See Credit Facility Borrowings and Liquidity below for additional information.
The following table presents net cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
Net
Cash Provided by
Operating Activities
Net Cash Used in
Investing Activities
Net Cash Provided by (Used in)
Financing Activities
2018
2017
2016
2018
2017
2016
2018
2017
2016
Ameren
$
2,170
$
2,118
$
2,117
$
(2,336
)
$
(2,204
)
$
(2,158
)
$
205
$
102
$
(258
)
Ameren
Missouri
1,260
1,017
1,169
(976
)
(684
)
(937
)
(283
)
(331
)
(434
)
Ameren
Illinois
659
828
796
(1,248
)
(1,070
)
(918
)
628
255
51
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities
Our cash provided by operating activities is affected by fluctuations of trade accounts receivable, inventories, and accounts and wages payable, among other things, as well as the unique regulatory environment for each of our businesses. Substantially all expenditures related to fuel, purchased power, and natural gas purchased for resale are recovered from customers through rate adjustment mechanisms, which may be adjusted without a traditional rate proceeding. Similar regulatory mechanisms exist for certain operating expenses that can also affect the timing of cash provided by operating activities. The timing of cash payments for costs recoverable under our regulatory mechanisms differs from the recovery period of those costs. Additionally, the seasonality of our electric and natural gas businesses, primarily caused by changes in customer demand due to weather, significantly affect the amount
and timing of our cash provided by operating activities. See Part 1, Item 1, and Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of this report for more information about our rate-adjustment mechanisms.
Ameren’s cash from operating activities increased $52 million in 2018 compared with 2017.
The following items contributed to the increase:
•
A $220 million increase resulting from electric and natural gas margins, as discussed in Results of Operations, excluding certain noncash items, as well as the change in customer receivable balances.
•
A $27 million decrease in payments for nuclear refueling and maintenance outages at Ameren Missouri’s Callaway energy center. There was no refueling and maintenance outage in 2018; however, there were cash expenditures related to the 2019 scheduled outage paid in 2018.
•
The
absence of $21 million in refunds paid in 2017 associated with the November 2013 FERC complaint case, as discussed in Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
The following items partially offset the increase in Ameren’s cash from operating activities between years:
•
A net $88 million decrease resulting from costs and associated collections under various cost recovery mechanisms from Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois customers.
•
A $40 million
decrease resulting from income tax payments of $21 million in 2018, compared with income tax refunds of $19 million in 2017, primarily due to state income tax refunds and the sale of state tax credits.
•
A $25 million increase in energy center maintenance costs at Ameren Missouri, primarily due to higher-than-normal, non-nuclear scheduled outage costs, and an increase in routine maintenance work.
•
A $19 million increase in payments related to donations.
•
A
$17 million increase in interest payments, primarily due to an increase in the average outstanding debt balance at ATXI.
Ameren Missouri
Ameren Missouri’s cash from operating activities increased $243 million in 2018 compared with 2017. The following items contributed to the increase:
•
A $136 million increase resulting from electric and natural gas margins, as discussed in Results of Operations, excluding certain noncash items, as well as the change in customer receivable
balances.
•
A net $95 million increase resulting from net energy costs and associated collections from customers under the FAC.
•
A decrease in income tax payments of $49 million to Ameren (parent) pursuant to the tax allocation agreement, primarily due to the lower federal income tax rate and lower property-related deductions.
•
A
$27 million decrease in payments for scheduled nuclear refueling and maintenance outages at the Callaway energy center. There was no refueling and maintenance outage in 2018; however, there were cash expenditures related to the 2019 scheduled outage paid in 2018.
The increase was partially offset by a $25 million increase in energy center maintenance costs, primarily due to higher-than-normal nonnuclear scheduled outage costs, and an increase in routine maintenance work between periods.
Ameren Illinois
Ameren Illinois’ cash from operating activities decreased $169 million in 2018 compared with 2017. The following items contributed to the
decrease:
•
A net $183 million decrease resulting from costs and associated collections under various cost recovery mechanisms from customers.
•
A $50 million decrease resulting from income tax payments of $28 million, compared with income tax refunds of $22 million in 2017, to Ameren (parent) pursuant to the tax allocation agreement resulting primarily from the lower federal income tax rate and lower property-related deductions.
The following items partially offset the decrease
in Ameren Illinois’ cash from operating activities between periods:
•
A $75 million increase resulting from electric and natural gas margins, as discussed in Results of Operations, excluding certain noncash items, as well as the change in customer receivable balances.
•
The absence of $17 million in refunds paid in 2017 associated with the November 2013 FERC complaint case, as discussed in Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
Ameren’s cash from operating activities were comparable between 2017 and 2016. The following items increased cash from operating activities:
•
A $167 million increase resulting from electric and natural gas margins, as discussed in Results of Operations, excluding certain noncash items, as well as the change in customer receivable balances.
•
A
$14 million decrease in coal inventory because of decreased market prices and decreased purchases at Ameren Missouri as a result of inventory reductions at its energy centers.
The following items largely offset the increase in Ameren’s cash from operating activities during 2017, compared with 2016:
•
A net $83 million decrease resulting from costs and associated collections under various cost recovery mechanisms from Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois customers.
•
The absence
of a $42 million insurance receipt received in 2016 at Ameren Missouri related to the Taum Sauk breach that occurred in December 2005.
•
Refunds paid in 2017 of $21 million associated with the November 2013 FERC complaint case, as discussed in Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
•
A $14 million increase in the cost of natural gas held in storage at Ameren Illinois, caused primarily by reduced withdrawals as a result of milder winter temperatures compared with the prior year.
•
A
$13 million increase in interest payments, primarily due to an increase in the average outstanding debt at Ameren Illinois.
Ameren Missouri
Ameren Missouri’s cash from operating activities decreased $152 million in 2017 compared with 2016. The following items contributed to the decrease:
•
An increase in income tax payments of $151 million to Ameren (parent) pursuant to the tax allocation agreement, primarily related to higher taxable income in 2017, because of significantly lower property-related deductions.
•
The
absence of a $42 million insurance receipt received in 2016 related to the Taum Sauk breach that occurred in December 2005.
•
A net $47 million decrease resulting from costs and associated collections under various cost recovery mechanisms from customers.
The following items partially offset the decrease in Ameren Missouri’s cash from operating activities between years:
•
A $70 million increase resulting from electric and natural gas margins, as discussed in Results of Operations,
excluding certain noncash items, as well as the change in customer receivable balances.
•
A $14 million decrease in coal inventory as a result of decreased market prices and decreased purchases as a result of inventory reductions at the energy centers.
Ameren Illinois
Ameren Illinois’ cash from operating activities increased $32 million in 2017 compared with 2016. The following items contributed to the increase:
•
A
$75 million increase resulting from electric and natural gas margins, as discussed in Results of Operations, excluding certain noncash items, as well as the change in customer receivable balances.
•
A $30 million increase resulting from income tax refunds of $22 million in 2017, compared with income tax payments of $8 million in 2016, pursuant to the tax allocation agreement with Ameren (parent), primarily related to tax losses in 2017 as a result of higher property-related deductions and use of net operating losses.
The following items partially offset the increase in Ameren Illinois’ cash from operating activities between periods:
•
A
net $36 million decrease resulting from costs and associated collections under various cost recovery mechanisms from customers.
•
Refunds paid in 2017 of $17 million associated with the November 2013 FERC complaint case, as discussed in Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
•
A $14 million increase in the cost of natural gas held in storage, caused primarily by reduced withdrawals as a result of milder winter temperatures compared with the prior year.
•
A
$13 million increase in interest payments, primarily due to an increase in the average outstanding debt.
Ameren’s pension plans are funded in compliance with income tax regulations, federal funding, and other regulatory requirements. As a result, Ameren expects to fund its pension plans at a level equal to the greater of the pension cost or the legally required minimum contribution. Based on Ameren’s assumptions at December 31, 2018, its investment performance in 2018,
and its pension funding policy, Ameren expects to make annual contributions of $20 million to $70 million in each of the next five years, with aggregate estimated contributions of $200 million. We estimate that Ameren Missouri’s and Ameren Illinois’ portions of the future funding requirements will be approximately 30% and 60%, respectively. These estimates may change based on actual investment performance, changes in interest rates, changes in our assumptions, changes in government regulations, and any voluntary contributions. In 2018, Ameren contributed $60 million to its pension plans. See Note 10 – Retirement Benefits under Part II, Item 8, of this
report for additional information.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
2018 versus 2017
Ameren’s cash used in investing activities increased $132 million during 2018 compared with 2017, primarily as a result of increased capital expenditures of $154 million, partially offset by an $11 million decrease due to the timing of nuclear fuel expenditures. Increased
capital expenditures at Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois, discussed below, were partially offset by a $171 million decrease in capital expenditures at ATXI. ATXI’s capital expenditures decreased as a result of decreased expenditures on the Illinois Rivers and Spoon River projects. The Spoon River project was placed in service in February 2018.
Ameren Missouri’s cash used in investing activities increased $292 million during 2018 compared with 2017, primarily due to money pool activity and increased capital expenditures. During 2018, Ameren Missouri had no money pool activity, compared with $161 million in returns of net money pool advances received during
2017. Additionally, capital expenditures increased $141 million between periods, primarily related to energy center projects and electric distribution system reliability projects. The increase in capital expenditures was partially offset by an $11 million decrease due to the timing of nuclear fuel expenditures.
Ameren Illinois’ cash used in investing activities increased $178 million during 2018 compared with 2017 due to an increase in capital expenditures of $182
million, primarily related to substation upgrades, upgrades to natural gas main infrastructure, and electric transmission system reliability projects.
2017 versus 2016
Ameren’s cash used in investing activities increased $46 million during 2017 compared with 2016, primarily as a result of increased capital expenditures of $56 million. Increased capital expenditures at Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois, discussed below, were partially offset by a $127 million decrease in capital expenditures at ATXI. Reduced spending on ATXI’s Illinois Rivers project was partially offset by an increase
in spending on its Spoon River project.
Ameren Missouri’s cash used in investing activities decreased $253 million during 2017 compared with 2016, primarily because of net money pool advances. During 2017, Ameren Missouri received $161 million in returns of net money pool advances compared with investing $125 million in net money pool advances in 2016. This decrease was partially offset by a $35 million increase in capital expenditures, primarily related to electric distribution
and transmission system reliability projects and energy center projects.
Ameren Illinois’ cash used in investing activities increased $152 million during 2017 compared with 2016 because of increased capital expenditures, primarily related to electric transmission system reliability projects and natural gas infrastructure projects.
Capital Expenditures
The following table presents our capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
2018
2017
2016
Ameren
Missouri
$
914
$
773
$
738
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution
503
476
470
Ameren
Illinois Natural Gas
311
245
181
Ameren Illinois Transmission
444
355
273
ATXI
118
289
416
Other (a)
(4
)
(6
)
(2
)
Ameren
$
2,286
$
2,132
$
2,076
(a)
Includes
amounts for the elimination of intercompany transfers.
Ameren’s 2018 capital expenditures consisted of expenditures made by its subsidiaries, including ATXI, which spent $118 million primarily on the Illinois Rivers and Mark Twain projects. Ameren Illinois spent $444 million on transmission projects, $188 million on natural gas projects eligible for QIP recovery, and $89 million on IEIMA projects. Other capital expenditures were made principally to maintain, upgrade, and improve the reliability of the
transmission and distribution systems of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois by investing in substation upgrades, energy center projects, and smart-grid technology. Additionally, the Ameren Companies invested in various software projects.
Ameren’s 2017 capital expenditures consisted of expenditures made by its subsidiaries, including ATXI, which spent $289 million primarily on the Illinois Rivers and Spoon River projects. Ameren Illinois spent $355 million on transmission projects, $153 million on natural gas projects eligible for QIP recovery, and $123 million on IEIMA projects. Other capital expenditures were made principally to maintain, upgrade, and improve the reliability of the transmission and distribution systems of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois by investing in substation upgrades, energy center projects, and smart-grid technology. Additionally, the Ameren Companies invested in various software projects.
Ameren’s
2016 capital expenditures consisted of expenditures made by its subsidiaries, including ATXI, which spent $416 million primarily on the Illinois Rivers project. Ameren Illinois spent $273 million on transmission projects and $109 million on IEIMA projects. Other capital expenditures were made principally to maintain, upgrade, and improve the reliability of the transmission and distribution systems of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois as well as to fund various Ameren Missouri energy center upgrades.
The following table presents Ameren’s estimate of capital expenditures that will be incurred from 2019 through 2023, including construction expenditures, allowance for funds used during construction, and expenditures for compliance with existing environmental regulations:
2019
2020-2023
Total
Ameren
Missouri
$
1,070
$
5,410
–
$
5,980
$
6,480
–
$
7,050
Ameren
Illinois Electric Distribution
495
1,925
–
2,125
2,420
–
2,620
Ameren
Illinois Natural Gas
350
1,165
–
1,290
1,515
–
1,640
Ameren
Illinois Transmission
360
1,765
–
1,950
2,125
–
2,310
ATXI
155
65
–
70
220
–
225
Other
5
5
–
5
10
–
10
Ameren
$
2,435
$
10,335
–
$
11,420
$
12,770
–
$
13,855
Ameren
Missouri’s estimated capital expenditures include transmission, distribution, grid modernization, and generation-related investments, as well as expenditures for compliance with environmental regulations. In addition, Ameren Missouri’s estimated capital expenditures include approximately $1 billion in wind generation investments expected in 2020. Ameren Illinois’ estimated capital expenditures are primarily for electric and natural gas transmission and distribution-related investments, capital expenditures to modernize its distribution system pursuant to the IEIMA, and capital expenditures for qualified investments in natural gas infrastructure under the QIP rider. ATXI’s estimated capital expenditures include expenditures for the two MISO-approved multi-value transmission projects. For additional information regarding Ameren Missouri’s build-transfer wind agreements, IEIMA capital expenditure requirements, the QIP rider, and ATXI’s transmission projects, see Part I,
Item 1, of this report.
Ameren Missouri continually reviews its generation portfolio and expected power needs. As a result, Ameren Missouri could modify its plan for generation capacity, the type of generation asset technology that will be employed, and whether capacity or power may be purchased, among other changes. Additionally, we continually review the reliability of our transmission and distribution systems, expected capacity needs, and opportunities for transmission investments within and outside our service territories. The timing and amount of investments could vary because of changes in expected capacity, the condition of transmission and distribution systems, and our ability and willingness to pursue transmission investments, among other factors. Any changes in future generation, transmission, or distribution needs could result in significant changes in capital expenditures or losses, which could be material. Compliance
with environmental regulations could also have significant impacts on the level of capital expenditures.
Environmental Capital Expenditures
Ameren Missouri will continue to incur costs to comply with federal and state regulations, including those requiring the reduction of SO2, NOx, and mercury emissions from its coal-fired energy centers. See Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item 8, of this report for a discussion of existing and proposed environmental laws that affect, or may affect, our facilities and capital expenditures to comply with such laws.
Cash provided by, or used in, financing activities is a result of our financing needs, which depend on the level of cash provided by operating activities, the level of cash used in investing activities, the level of dividends, and our long-term debt maturities, among other things.
2018 versus 2017
Ameren’s cash provided by financing activities increased $103 million during 2018 compared with 2017. During 2018, Ameren utilized net proceeds from the issuance of $1,464 million
of long-term indebtedness and net commercial paper issuances and cash on hand to repay $841 million of higher-cost long-term indebtedness and to fund, in part, investing activities. In comparison, during 2017, Ameren utilized net proceeds from the issuance of $1,345 million of long-term indebtedness to repay $681 million of higher-cost long-term indebtedness, to repay $74 million of net commercial paper issuances, and to fund, in part, investing activities. During 2018, Ameren made $451 million in dividend payments to shareholders, compared with $431 million in dividend payments in 2017.
Additionally, Ameren issued $74 million in common stock under its DRPlus and 401(k) plan during 2018. Ameren also issued $35 million of common stock related to stock-based compensation resulting in noncash financing activity during 2018, compared with $24 million paid for the repurchase of common stock for stock-based compensation in 2017. Ameren did not issue common stock in 2017.
Ameren Missouri’s cash used in financing activities decreased $48 million in 2018 compared with 2017.
During 2018, Ameren Missouri utilized net proceeds from the issuance of $439 million of long-term indebtedness and net commercial paper issuances, along with cash on hand, to repay $384 million of higher-cost long-term indebtedness and to fund, in part, investing activities. In comparison, during 2017, Ameren Missouri utilized net proceeds from the issuance of $438 million of long-term indebtedness and net commercial paper issuances, along with cash on hand, to repay $431 million of higher-cost long-term indebtedness. In 2018, Ameren Missouri paid $375 million in common stock dividends, compared with $362
million in dividend payments in 2017. Additionally, during 2018, Ameren Missouri received $45 million in capital contributions from Ameren (parent), associated with the tax allocation agreement, compared with $30 million received in 2017.
Ameren Illinois’ cash provided by financing activities increased $373 million in 2018, compared with 2017. During 2018, Ameren Illinois utilized net proceeds from the issuance of $939 million of long-term indebtedness
and net commercial paper issuances to repay at maturity $457 million of higher-cost long-term indebtedness and to fund, in part, investing activities. In comparison, during 2017, Ameren Illinois issued $507 million of long-term indebtedness and net commercial paper issuances and utilized the proceeds to repay $250 million of higher-cost long-term indebtedness, and to fund, in part, investing activities. Additionally, during 2018, Ameren Illinois received $160 million in capital contributions from Ameren (parent), compared with $8 million received in 2017.
2017
versus 2016
Ameren’s financing activities provided net cash of $102 million in 2017 compared with using net cash of $258 million in 2016. During 2017, Ameren utilized net proceeds from the issuance of $1,345 million of long-term indebtedness to repay $681 million of higher-cost long-term indebtedness, to repay $74 million of net commercial paper issuances, and to fund, in part, investing activities. In comparison, during 2016, Ameren utilized net proceeds from the issuance of $653 million of long-term indebtedness and net commercial paper issuances to repay $395 million of higher-cost
long-term indebtedness and to fund, in part, investing activities. Additionally, during 2017, Ameren made $431 million in dividend payments to shareholders, compared with $416 million in dividend payments in 2016.
Ameren Missouri’s cash used in financing activities decreased $103 million in 2017 compared with 2016. During 2017, Ameren Missouri utilized net proceeds from the issuance of $438 million of long-term indebtedness and net commercial paper issuances to repay $431 million of higher-cost long-term indebtedness. In comparison, during 2016, Ameren Missouri issued $149 million of long-term indebtedness and used the proceeds, along with cash on hand,
to repay $266 million of higher-cost long-term indebtedness. In 2017, Ameren Missouri paid $362 million in dividends to Ameren (parent), compared with $355 million dividends paid in 2016. Additionally, during 2017, Ameren Missouri received $30 million in capital contributions from Ameren (parent) associated with the tax allocation agreement, compared with $44 million received in 2016.
Ameren Illinois’ cash provided by financing activities increased by $204 million in 2017, compared with 2016. During 2017, Ameren Illinois utilized net proceeds from the issuance of $507 million of long-term indebtedness and net
commercial paper issuances to repay at maturity $250 million of higher-cost long-term indebtedness. In comparison, during 2016, Ameren Illinois issued $298 million of long-term indebtedness and net commercial paper issuances and utilized the proceeds to repay at maturity $129 million of higher-cost long-term indebtedness. Additionally, in 2017, no dividends were paid to Ameren (parent), compared with $110 million paid in 2016.
Credit Facility Borrowings and Liquidity
The liquidity needs of Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois are typically supported through the use of available cash, or proceeds from borrowings under
the Credit Agreements, commercial paper issuances and/or, in the case of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois, short-term affiliate borrowings. See Note 4 – Short-term Debt and Liquidity under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional
Less: Ameren (parent) commercial
paper outstanding
274
Less: Ameren Missouri commercial paper outstanding
55
Less: Letters of credit
7
Missouri Credit Agreement – subtotal
664
Ameren
(parent) and Ameren Illinois(b):
Illinois Credit Agreement – borrowing capacity
1,100
Less: Ameren (parent) commercial paper outstanding
196
Less:
Ameren Illinois commercial paper outstanding
72
Less: Letters of credit
2
Illinois Credit Agreement – subtotal
830
Subtotal
$
1,494
Cash
and cash equivalents
16
Net Available Liquidity
$
1,510
(a)
The maximum aggregate amount available to Ameren (parent) and Ameren Missouri under the Missouri Credit Agreement is $700 million and
$800 million, respectively. See Note 4 – Short-term Debt and Liquidity under Part II, Item 8, of this report for further discussion of the Credit Agreements.
(b)
The maximum aggregate amount available to Ameren (parent) and Ameren Illinois under the Illinois Credit Agreement is $500 million and $800 million, respectively. See Note 4 – Short-term Debt and Liquidity under Part II, Item 8, of this report for further discussion of the Credit Agreements.
In December 2018, the Credit Agreements, which were scheduled to mature in December 2021, were extended and now mature in December 2022. The Credit Agreements provide $2.1 billion of credit cumulatively through maturity. The maturity
date may be extended for an additional one-year period upon mutual consent of the borrowers and lenders. Borrowings by Ameren (parent) under either of the Credit Agreements are due and payable no later than the maturity date, while borrowings by Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois are due and payable no later than the earlier of the maturity date or 364 days after the date of such borrowing (subject to the right of each borrower to re-borrow in accordance with the terms of the applicable Credit Agreement). The Credit Agreements are used to borrow cash, to issue letters of credit, and to support issuances under Ameren (parent)’s, Ameren Missouri’s, and Ameren Illinois’ commercial paper programs. Both of the credit agreements are available to Ameren (parent) to support issuances under Ameren (parent)’s commercial paper program, subject to available credit capacity under the agreements. The Missouri Credit Agreement is available to support issuances
under Ameren Missouri’s commercial paper program. The Illinois Credit Agreement is available to support issuances under Ameren Illinois’ commercial paper program. Issuances under the Ameren (parent), Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois commercial paper programs were available at lower interest rates than the interest rates of borrowings under the Credit Agreements. Commercial paper issuances were thus preferred to credit facility borrowings as a source of third-party short-term debt.
Ameren has a money pool agreement with and among its utility subsidiaries to coordinate and to provide for certain short-term cash and working capital requirements. As short-term capital needs arise, and based on availability of funding sources, Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois will access funds from the utility money pool, the Credit Agreements, or the commercial paper programs depending on which option has the lowest interest rates. See Note 4 –
Short-term Debt and Liquidity under Part II, Item 8, of this report for a detailed explanation of the utility money pool arrangement.
The issuance of short-term debt securities by Ameren’s utility subsidiaries is subject to FERC approval under the Federal Power Act. In 2018, the FERC issued orders authorizing Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois to each issue up to $1 billion of short-term debt securities through March 2020 and September 2020, respectively. In June 2017, the FERC issued an order authorizing ATXI to issue up to $300 million of short-term debt securities through July 2019.
The Ameren Companies continually evaluate the adequacy and appropriateness of their liquidity arrangements for changing business conditions. When business conditions warrant, changes may be made to existing credit agreements or to other short-term borrowing arrangements.
The following table presents Ameren’s equity issuances, as well as issuances (net of issuance premiums or discounts), redemptions, repurchases, and maturities of long-term debt for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016. For additional information related to the terms and uses of these issuances and effective registration statements, see Note 5 – Long-term Debt and Equity Financings under Part II, Item 8, of this report. For information on capital contributions received by Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois from Ameren (parent), see Note 13 – Related-party Transactions under Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Month Issued, Redeemed,
Repurchased, or Matured
2018
2017
2016
Issuances of Long-term Debt
Ameren
Missouri:
4.00% First mortgage bonds due 2048
April
$
423
$
—
$
—
2.95%
Senior secured notes due 2027
June
—
399
—
3.65% Senior secured notes due 2045
June
—
—
149
Ameren
Illinois:
3.80% First mortgage bonds due 2028
May
430
—
—
4.50%
First mortgage bonds due 2049
November
499
—
—
3.70% First mortgage bonds due 2047
November
—
496
—
4.15%
Senior secured notes due 2046
December
—
—
247
ATXI:
3.43%
Senior notes due 2050
June
—
150
—
3.43% Senior notes due 2050
August
—
300
—
Total
long-term debt issuances
$
1,352
$
1,345
$
396
Issuances
of Common Stock
Ameren:
DRPlus
and 401(k)
Various
$
74
(a)(b)
$
—
$
—
Total
common stock issuances
$
74
$
—
$
—
Total Ameren long-term
debt and common stock issuances
$
1,426
$
1,345
$
396
Redemptions,
Repurchases, and Maturities of Long-term Debt
Ameren Missouri:
6.00%
Senior secured notes due 2018
April
179
—
—
5.10% Senior secured notes due 2018
August
199
—
—
6.40%
Senior secured notes due 2017
June
—
425
—
5.40% Senior secured notes due 2016
February
—
—
260
City
of Bowling Green financing obligation (Peno Creek CT)
December
6
6
6
Ameren Illinois:
6.25%
Senior secured notes due 2018
April
144
—
—
9.75% Senior secured notes due 2018
November
313
—
—
6.125%
Senior secured notes due 2017
November
—
250
—
6.20% Senior secured notes due 2016
June
—
—
54
6.25%
Senior secured notes due 2016
June
—
—
75
Total long-term debt redemptions, repurchases, and maturities
$
841
$
681
$
395
(a) Ameren
issued a total of 1.2 million shares of common stock under its DRPlus and 401(k) plan.
(b) Excludes 0.7 million shares of common stock valued at $35 million issued in connection with stock-based compensation.
The Ameren Companies may sell securities registered under their effective registration statements if market conditions and capital requirements warrant such sales. Any offer and sale will be made only by means of a prospectus that meets the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the rules and regulations thereunder.
Indebtedness Provisions and Other Covenants
At December 31, 2018,
the Ameren Companies were in compliance with the provisions and covenants contained within their credit agreements, indentures, and articles of incorporation, as applicable, and ATXI was in compliance with the provisions and covenants contained in its note purchase agreement. See Note 4 – Short-term Debt and Liquidity and Note 5 – Long-term Debt and Equity Financings under Part II, Item 8, of this report for a discussion of covenants and provisions (and applicable cross-default provisions) contained in our credit agreements, certain of the Ameren Companies’ indentures and articles of incorporation, and ATXI’s note purchase agreement.
We consider access to short-term and long-term capital markets to be a significant source of funding for capital requirements not satisfied by cash provided by our operating activities. Inability to raise capital on reasonable terms, particularly during times of uncertainty in
the capital markets, could negatively affect our ability to maintain and expand our businesses. After assessing its current operating performance, liquidity, and credit ratings (see Credit Ratings below), Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois each believes that it will continue to have access to the capital markets. However, events beyond Ameren’s, Ameren Missouri’s, and Ameren Illinois’ control may create uncertainty in the capital markets or make access to the capital markets uncertain or limited. Such events could increase our cost of capital and adversely affect our ability to access the capital markets.
Dividends
Ameren paid to its shareholders common stock dividends totaling $451 million,
or $1.8475 per share, in 2018, $431 million, or $1.7775 per share, in 2017, and $416 million, or $1.715 per share, in 2016.
The amount and timing of dividends payable on Ameren’s common stock are within the sole discretion of Ameren’s board of directors. Ameren’s board of directors has not set specific targets or payout parameters when declaring common stock dividends, but it considers various factors, including Ameren’s overall payout ratio, payout ratios of our peers, projected cash flow and potential future cash flow requirements, historical earnings and cash
flow, projected earnings, impacts of regulatory orders or legislation, and other key business considerations. Ameren expects its dividend payout ratio to be between 55% and 70% of earnings over the next few years. On February 8, 2019, the board of directors of Ameren declared a quarterly dividend on Ameren’s common stock of 47.5 cents per share, payable on March 29, 2019, to shareholders of record on March 13, 2019.
Certain of our financial agreements and corporate organizational documents contain covenants and conditions that, among other things, restrict the Ameren Companies’ payment of dividends in certain circumstances.
Ameren
Illinois’ articles of incorporation require its dividend payments on common stock to be based on ratios of common stock to total capitalization and other provisions with respect to certain operating expenses and accumulations of earned surplus. Additionally, Ameren has committed to the FERC to maintain a minimum of 30% equity in the capital structure at Ameren Illinois.
Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois, as well as certain other nonregistrant Ameren subsidiaries, are subject to Section 305(a) of the Federal Power Act, which makes it unlawful for any officer or director of a public utility, as defined in the Federal Power Act, to participate in the making or paying of any dividend from any funds “properly included in capital account.” The FERC has consistently interpreted the provision to allow dividends to be paid as long as (1) the source of the dividends is clearly disclosed, (2) the dividends are not excessive,
and (3) there is no self-dealing on the part of corporate officials. At a minimum, Ameren believes that dividends can be paid by its subsidiaries that are public utilities from net income and from retained earnings. In addition, under Illinois law, Ameren Illinois and ATXI may not pay any dividend on their respective stock unless, among other things, their respective earnings and earned surplus are sufficient to declare and pay a dividend after provisions are made for reasonable and proper reserves, or unless Ameren Illinois or ATXI has specific authorization from the ICC.
At December 31, 2018, the amount of restricted net assets of Ameren’s subsidiaries that may not be distributed to Ameren in the form of a loan or dividend was $2.8 billion.
The following table presents common stock dividends
declared and paid by Ameren Corporation to its common shareholders and by Ameren subsidiaries to their parent, Ameren:
2018
2017
2016
Ameren
$
451
$
431
$
416
Ameren
Missouri
375
362
355
Ameren Illinois
—
—
110
ATXI
75
—
—
Ameren
Missouri and Ameren Illinois each have issued preferred stock, which provides for cumulative preferred stock dividends. Each company’s board of directors considers the declaration of preferred stock dividends to shareholders of record on a certain date, stating the date on which the dividend is payable and the amount to be paid. See Note 5 – Long-term Debt and Equity Financings under Part II, Item 8, of this report for further detail concerning the preferred stock issuances.
The following table presents our contractual
obligations as of December 31, 2018. See Note 10 – Retirement Benefits under Part II, Item 8, of this report for information regarding expected minimum funding levels for our pension plans, which are not included in the table below. In addition, routine short-term purchase order commitments are not included.
2019
2020
– 2021
2022 – 2023
2024 and Thereafter
Total
Ameren:(a)
Long-term
debt and financing obligations(b)
$
580
$
450
$
745
$
6,734
$
8,509
Interest
payments(c)
348
653
625
4,281
5,907
Operating
leases
10
15
11
9
45
Other
obligations(d)
799
746
221
166
1,932
Total
cash contractual obligations
$
1,737
$
1,864
$
1,602
$
11,190
$
16,393
Ameren
Missouri:
Long-term debt and financing obligations(b)
$
580
$
100
$
295
$
3,054
$
4,029
Interest
payments(c)
176
322
319
1,934
2,751
Operating
leases
8
13
10
9
40
Other
obligations(d)
467
489
195
130
1,281
Total
cash contractual obligations
$
1,231
$
924
$
819
$
5,127
$
8,101
Ameren
Illinois:
Long-term debt(b)
$
—
$
—
$
400
$
2,930
$
3,330
Interest
payments(c)
133
266
253
2,140
2,792
Operating
leases
1
—
—
—
1
Other
obligations(d)
322
243
26
20
611
Total
cash contractual obligations
$
456
$
509
$
679
$
5,090
$
6,734
(a)
Includes
amounts for registrant and nonregistrant Ameren subsidiaries and intercompany eliminations.
(b)
Excludes unamortized discount and premium and debt issuance costs of $70 million, $31 million, and $34 million at Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois, respectively. See Note 5 – Long-term Debt and Equity Financings under Part II, Item 8 of this report, for discussion of items included herein.
(c)
The
weighted-average variable-rate debt has been calculated using the interest rate as of December 31, 2018.
(d)
See Other Obligations in Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item 8 of this report, for discussion of items included herein.
Off-balance-sheet Arrangements
At December 31, 2018, none of the Ameren Companies had any significant off-balance-sheet financing
arrangements, other than operating leases entered into in the ordinary course of business, variable interest entities, letters of credit, and Ameren (parent) guarantee arrangements on behalf of its subsidiaries. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies under Part II, Item 8, of this report for further detail concerning variable interest entities.
Credit Ratings
Our credit ratings affect our liquidity, our access to the capital markets and credit markets, our cost of borrowing under our credit facilities and our commercial paper programs, and our collateral posting requirements under commodity contracts.
The following table presents the principal credit ratings of the Ameren Companies by Moody’s and S&P effective on the date of this report:
Moody’s
S&P
Ameren:
Issuer/corporate credit rating
Baa1
BBB+
Senior
unsecured debt
Baa1
BBB
Commercial paper
P-2
A-2
Ameren Missouri:
Issuer/corporate credit rating
Baa1
BBB+
Secured debt
A2
A
Senior
unsecured debt
Baa1
Not Rated
Commercial paper
P-2
A-2
Ameren Illinois:
Issuer/corporate credit rating
A3
BBB+
Secured debt
A1
A
Senior
unsecured debt
A3
BBB+
Commercial paper
P-2
A-2
ATXI:
Issuer credit rating
A2
Not Rated
Senior unsecured debt
A2
Not
Rated
A credit rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold securities. It should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating organization.
Collateral Postings
Any weakening of our credit ratings may reduce access to capital and trigger additional collateral postings and prepayments. Such changes may also increase the cost of borrowing, resulting in an adverse effect on earnings. Cash collateral postings and prepayments made with external parties, including postings related to exchange-traded contracts, and cash collateral posted by external parties were immaterial at December 31, 2018.
A sub-investment-grade issuer or senior unsecured debt rating (below “Baa3” from Moody’s or below “BBB-” from S&P) at December 31, 2018, could have resulted in Ameren, Ameren Missouri, or Ameren Illinois being required to post additional collateral or other assurances for certain trade obligations amounting to $94 million, $64 million, and $30 million, respectively.
Changes in commodity prices could trigger additional collateral postings and prepayments. Based on credit ratings at December 31, 2018, if market prices were 15% higher or lower than December 31, 2018, levels in the next 12 months and 20% higher or lower thereafter
through the end of the term of the commodity contracts, then Ameren, Ameren Missouri, or Ameren Illinois could be required to post an immaterial amount, compared to each company’s liquidity, of collateral or provide other assurances for certain trade obligations.
OUTLOOK
We seek to earn competitive returns on investments in our businesses. We seek to improve our regulatory frameworks and cost recovery mechanisms and are simultaneously pursuing constructive regulatory outcomes within existing frameworks, while also advocating for responsible energy policies. We align our overall spending, both operating and capital, with economic conditions and with the frameworks established by our regulators, to create and capitalize on investment opportunities for the benefit of our customers and shareholders. We focus on
minimizing the gap between allowed and earned returns on equity and allocating capital resources to business opportunities that we expect will offer the most attractive risk-adjusted return potential.
As part of Ameren’s strategic plan, we pursue projects to meet our customers’ energy needs and to improve electric and natural gas system reliability, safety, and security within our service territories. Ameren also evaluates competitive electric transmission investment opportunities as they arise. Additionally, Ameren Missouri expects to make investments over time that will enable it to transition to a more diverse energy generation portfolio, including investments in renewable energy resources and the retirement of its coal-fired generation at the end of each energy center’s useful life.
Below are some key trends, events, and uncertainties that may reasonably affect our results of
operations, financial condition, or liquidity, as well as our ability to achieve strategic and financial objectives, for 2019 and beyond.
On June 1, 2018, Missouri Senate Bill 564 was enacted. The provision of the law applicable to the TCJA was effective immediately; the remaining provisions, including the ability to elect PISA, became effective August 28,
2018. The law required the MoPSC to authorize a reduction in Ameren Missouri’s rates to pass through the effect of the TCJA within 90 days of the law’s effective date. In July 2018, the MoPSC authorized Ameren Missouri to reduce its annual revenue requirement by $167 million and reflect that reduction in rates beginning August 1, 2018. The reduction included $74 million for the amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes. In addition, Ameren Missouri recorded a reduction to revenue and a corresponding regulatory liability of $60 million for the excess amounts collected in rates related to the TCJA from January 1, 2018, through July 31, 2018. The regulatory liability
will be reflected in customer rates over a period of time to be determined by the MoPSC in the next regulatory rate review. Pursuant to its PISA election, Ameren Missouri is permitted to defer and recover 85% of the depreciation expense and a weighted-average cost of capital return on rate base on certain property, plant, and equipment placed in service after September 1, 2018, and not included in base rates. Accumulated PISA deferrals earn carrying costs at the weighted-average cost of capital, and all approved PISA deferrals will be added to rate base prospectively and recovered over a period of 20 years following a regulatory rate review. PISA mitigates the impacts of regulatory lag between regulatory rate reviews. The remaining
15% of certain property, plant, and equipment placed in service and not eligible for recovery under PISA, unless eligible for recovery under the RESRAM, remain subject to regulatory lag. As a result of the PISA election, additional provisions of the new law apply to Ameren Missouri, including limitations on electric customer rate increases and an electric base rate freeze until April 2020. Both the rate increase limitation and PISA are effective through December 2023, unless Ameren Missouri requests and receives MoPSC approval of an extension through December 2028. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of this report for information regarding Missouri Senate Bill 564.
•
In
February 2019, Ameren Missouri announced its Smart Energy Plan, which includes a five-year capital investment overview with a detailed one-year plan for 2019, designed to upgrade Ameren Missouri's electric infrastructure. The plan includes investments that will upgrade the grid and accommodate more renewable energy. Investments under the plan are expected to total approximately $6.3 billion over the five-year period from 2019 through 2023, with costs largely recoverable under PISA and, for the portion of wind and other renewable generation investments that are not recoverable under PISA, recoverable under the RESRAM.
•
In June 2018, the MoPSC approved Ameren Missouri’s Renewable Choice Program, which allows large commercial and industrial customers
and municipalities to elect to receive up to 100% of their energy from renewable resources. The tariff-based program is designed to recover the costs of the election, net of changes in the market price of such energy. Based on customer contracts, the program enables Ameren Missouri to supply up to 400 megawatts of renewable wind energy generation, up to 200 megawatts of which it could own. As applicable, the addition of generation by Ameren Missouri would be subject to the issuance of a certificate of convenience and necessity by the MoPSC, obtaining transmission interconnection agreements with MISO or other RTOs, and FERC approval. This generation would be incremental to estimated capital expenditures through 2023 discussed below. Ameren Missouri anticipates finalizing customer interest
and pursuing renewable energy projects to fulfill requirements in 2019. Without extension, the option to elect into the program will terminate in the third quarter of 2023.
•
In December 2018, the MoPSC issued an order approving Ameren Missouri’s MEEIA 2019 plan. The plan includes a portfolio of customer energy-efficiency programs through December 2021 and low-income customer energy-efficiency programs through December 2024, along with a regulatory recovery mechanism. Ameren Missouri intends to invest $226 million over the life of the plan, including $65 million per year through 2021. The plan includes the continued use of the MEEIA rider, which allows
Ameren Missouri to collect from, or refund to, customers any difference in actual MEEIA program costs and related lost electric margins and the amounts collected from customers. In addition, the plan includes a performance incentive that provides Ameren Missouri an opportunity to earn additional revenues by achieving certain customer energy-efficiency goals, including $30 million if 100% of the goals are achieved during the period ended December 2021. Additional revenues may be earned if Ameren Missouri exceeds 100% of its energy savings goals.
•
Ameren continues to make significant investments in FERC regulated electric transmission businesses. Ameren
Illinois expects to invest $2.2 billion in electric transmission assets from 2019 through 2023, to replace aging infrastructure and improve reliability. ATXI has three MISO-approved multi-value projects: the Spoon River, Illinois Rivers, and Mark Twain projects. The Spoon River project, located in northwest Illinois, was placed in service in February 2018. The Illinois Rivers project involves the construction of a transmission line from eastern Missouri across Illinois to western Indiana. Construction of the Illinois Rivers project is substantially complete, with the last section awaiting the outcome of certain legal proceedings, which will delay the expected completion date to 2020. This delay is not expected to materially affect 2019 rate base or earnings. The Mark Twain project involves the construction of a transmission line from northeast Missouri, connecting the Illinois Rivers project to Iowa. Construction of the
Mark Twain project began in the second quarter of 2018, and is expected to be completed by the end of 2019. ATXI’s expected remaining investment in its multi-value projects is approximately $150 million in 2019, with the total investment expected to be more than $1.6 billion.
•
Ameren Illinois and ATXI use a forward-looking rate calculation with an annual revenue requirement reconciliation for each company’s electric transmission business. Based on expected rate base growth and the currently allowed 10.82% return on common equity, the
2019 revenue requirements included in rates for Ameren Illinois’ and ATXI’s electric transmission businesses are $297 million and $177 million, respectively. These revenue requirements represent an increase in Ameren Illinois' and ATXI’s revenue requirements of $24 million and $3 million, respectively, primarily because of the rate base growth. These rates will affect Ameren Illinois’ and ATXI’s cash receipts during 2019, but will not determine their respective electric transmission service operating revenues, which will instead be based on 2019 actual recoverable costs, rate base, and return on common equity as calculated under the FERC formula ratemaking framework.
•
The return
on common equity for MISO transmission owners, including Ameren Illinois and ATXI, is the subject of a FERC complaint case filed in February 2015 challenging the allowed base return on common equity. Ameren Illinois and ATXI currently use the FERC authorized total allowed return on common equity of 10.82% in customer rates. A final FERC order would establish the allowed return on common equity to be applied to the 15-month period from February 2015 to May 2016 and also establish the return on common equity to be included in customer rates prospectively from the effective date of such order, replacing the current 10.82% total return on common equity. In October 2018, the FERC issued an order addressing the remanded issues in an unrelated case. That order proposed a new methodology for determining the base return on equity and required further briefs from the participants. In November 2018, the FERC issued an order related to the February 2015 complaint
case and the September 2016 final order, which required briefs from the participants to be filed in February 2019 regarding a new methodology for determining the base return on common equity and whether and how to apply the new methodology to the two MISO complaint cases. Ameren is unable to predict the ultimate impact of the proposed methodology on these complaint cases at this time. As the FERC is under no deadline to issue a final order, the timing of the issuance of the final order in the February 2015 complaint case, or any potential impact to the amounts refunded as a result of the September 2016 final order, is uncertain. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of this report for information regarding FERC complaint cases. A 50 basis point reduction in the FERC-allowed base return on common equity would reduce Ameren’s and Ameren Illinois’ net income by an estimated $9
million and $5 million, respectively, based on each company’s 2019 projected rate base.
•
In November 2018, the ICC issued an order in Ameren Illinois’ annual update filing that approved a $72 million increase in Ameren Illinois’ electric distribution service rates beginning in January 2019. However, Illinois law provides for an annual reconciliation of the electric distribution revenue requirement as is necessary to reflect the actual costs incurred and investment return in a given year with the revenue requirement that was reflected in customer rates for that year. Consequently, Ameren Illinois’ 2019 electric distribution service revenues will be based on its 2019 actual recoverable
costs, rate base, and return on common equity as calculated under the Illinois performance-based formula ratemaking framework. The 2019 revenue requirement is expected to be higher than the 2018 revenue requirement because of an expected increase in recoverable costs, expected rate base growth of approximately 8%, and an expected increase in the annual average of the monthly yields of the 30-year United States Treasury bonds. The 2019 revenue requirement reconciliation is expected to result in a regulatory asset that will be collected from customers in 2021. A 50 basis point change in the annual average of the monthly yields of the 30-year United States Treasury bonds would result in an estimated $8 million change in Ameren’s and Ameren Illinois’ net income, based on Ameren Illinois’ 2019 projected year-end rate base.
•
Ameren
Illinois is allowed to earn a return on its electric energy-efficiency program investments. Ameren Illinois’ electric energy-efficiency investments are deferred as a regulatory asset and earn a return at its weighted-average cost of capital, with the equity return based on the annual average of the monthly yields of the 30-year United States Treasury bonds plus 580 basis points. The equity portion of Ameren Illinois’ return on electric energy-efficiency investments can be increased or decreased by up to 200 basis points, depending on the achievement of annual energy savings goals. Pursuant to the FEJA, Ameren Illinois plans to invest up to $100 million per year in electric energy-efficiency programs through 2023 and will earn a return on those investments. The ICC has the ability to reduce electric energy-efficiency savings goals if there are insufficient cost-effective programs available or if the
savings goals would require investment levels that exceed amounts allowed by legislation. The electric energy-efficiency program investments and the return on those investments are collected from customers through a rider and are not included in the electric distribution formula ratemaking framework. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of this report for information regarding Ameren Illinois’ energy-efficiency program.
•
In November 2018, the ICC issued an order approving a stipulation and agreement that resulted in an annual natural gas rate increase of $32 million, based on a 9.87% return on common equity, a capital structure composed of 50% common equity, and a rate
base of $1.6 billion. This increase reflects the reduction in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate enacted under the TCJA, as well as the increase in the Illinois corporate income tax rate that became effective in July 2017, which collectively decreased annual rates by approximately $17 million. The new customer rates were effective in November 2018. As a result of this order, the rate base under the QIP rider was reset to zero. Ameren Illinois used a 2019 future test year in this proceeding.
•
Ameren Missouri’s next scheduled refueling and maintenance outage at its Callaway energy center is scheduled for the spring of 2019. During the 2017 refueling, Ameren Missouri incurred maintenance expenses of $35 million. During a scheduled
refueling, which occurs every 18 months, maintenance expenses increase relative to non-outage years. Additionally, depending on the availability of its other generation sources and the market prices for power, Ameren Missouri’s purchased power costs may increase and the amount of excess
power available for sale may decrease versus non-outage years. Changes in purchased power costs and excess power available for sale are included in the FAC, which results in limited impacts to earnings. In addition, Ameren Missouri may incur increased nonnuclear energy center maintenance costs in non-outage years.
•
Ameren
Missouri expects to realize lower costs of fuel for generation through 2023, compared to 2018 levels, based on coal and related transportation contracts and management’s outlook for future prices. Substantially all the benefit of these lower costs would be passed through to customers through the FAC.
•
Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois continue to make infrastructure investments and expect to seek regular electric and natural gas rate increases to recover the cost of investments and earn an adequate return. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois will also seek legislative solutions, as necessary, to address regulatory lag and to support investment in their utility infrastructure for the benefit of their customers. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois
continue to face cost recovery pressures, including limited economic growth in their service territories, customer conservation efforts, the impacts of additional customer energy-efficiency programs, and increased customer use of increasingly cost-effective technological advances, including private generation and energy storage. However, over the long-term, we expect the decreased demand to be partially offset by increased demand resulting from increased electrification of the economy for efficiencies and as a means to address CO2 emission concerns. Increased investments, including expected future investments for environmental compliance, system reliability improvements, and potential new generation sources, result in rate base and revenue growth but also higher depreciation and financing costs.
For additional information regarding recent
rate orders, lawsuits, and pending requests filed with state and federal regulatory commissions, see Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
•
Ameren Missouri’s 2017 IRP targets cleaner and more diverse sources of energy generation, including solar, wind, natural gas, hydro, and nuclear power. It also includes expanding renewable sources by adding at least 700 megawatts of wind generation by the end of 2020 in Missouri and neighboring states and adding 100 megawatts of solar generation by 2027. These new renewable energy sources would support Ameren Missouri’s compliance with the state of Missouri’s requirement of achieving 15% of native load sales from
renewable energy sources by 2021, subject to customer rate increase limitations. Based on current and projected market prices for energy and for wind and solar generation technologies, among other factors, Ameren Missouri expects its ownership of these renewable resources would represent the lowest-cost option for customers. The plan also provides for the expected implementation of continued customer energy-efficiency programs. Ameren Missouri’s plan for the addition of renewable resources could be affected by, among other factors: the availability of federal production and investment tax credits related to renewable energy and Ameren Missouri’s ability to use such credits; the cost of wind and solar generation technologies; energy prices; Ameren Missouri’s ability to obtain timely interconnection agreements with MISO or other RTOs, as well as the cost of such interconnections; and Ameren Missouri’s ability to obtain a certificate of convenience and necessity from the
MoPSC, and any other required project approvals.
•
In connection with the 2017 IRP filing, Ameren Missouri established a goal of reducing CO2 emissions 80% by 2050 from a 2005 base level. Ameren Missouri is also targeting a 35% CO2 emission reduction by 2030 and a 50% reduction by 2040 from the 2005 level. In order to meet these goals, among other things, Ameren Missouri expects to retire its coal-fired generation at the end of each energy center’s useful life.
•
In
the second quarter of 2018, Ameren Missouri entered into a build-transfer agreement with a subsidiary of Terra-Gen, LLC to acquire, after construction, a 400-megawatt wind generation facility, which is expected to be located in northeastern Missouri. In October 2018, the MoPSC issued an order approving a unanimous stipulation and agreement regarding a requested certificate of convenience and necessity for the facility. In December 2018, Ameren Missouri received FERC approval to acquire the facility after construction. A transmission interconnection agreement with the MISO for this facility is expected in the fall of 2019. Also, in October 2018, Ameren Missouri entered into a build-transfer agreement with a subsidiary of EDF Renewables, Inc. to acquire, after construction, a wind generation facility of up to 157 megawatts. In February 2019, Ameren Missouri
filed with the MoPSC a nonunanimous stipulation and agreement regarding a requested certificate of convenience and necessity for the facility. The up to 157-megawatt facility is expected to be located in northwestern Missouri. A transmission interconnection agreement with the MISO for this facility is expected in early 2020. Both facilities are expected to be completed by the end of 2020 and would help Ameren Missouri comply with the Missouri renewable energy standard. Each acquisition is subject to certain conditions, including entering into a MISO transmission interconnection agreement at an acceptable cost for each facility and obtaining FERC approval and the issuance of a certificate of convenience and necessity by the MoPSC for the up to 157-megawatt facility, as well as other customary contract terms and conditions. These agreements collectively represent approximately $1 billion in capital expenditures expected in
2020, which is included in Ameren Missouri’s Smart Energy Plan. In October and December 2018, the MoPSC issued orders approving a RESRAM that allows Ameren Missouri to adjust customer rates on an annual basis without a traditional regulatory rate review. The RESRAM is designed to mitigate the impacts of regulatory lag for the cost of compliance with renewable energy standards, including recovery of investments in wind and
other renewable generation, by providing more timely recovery of costs and a return on investments not already provided for
in customer rates or recovered under PISA.
•
Through 2023, we expect to make significant capital expenditures to improve our electric and natural gas utility infrastructure, with a major portion directed to our transmission and distribution systems. We estimate that we will invest up to $13.9 billion (Ameren Missouri – up to $7.1 billion; Ameren Illinois – up to $6.6 billion; ATXI – up to $0.2 billion) of capital expenditures during the period from 2019 through 2023.
Any additional wind generation investments by Ameren Missouri beyond the two facilities that Ameren Missouri has agreed to acquire after construction would be incremental to these estimates.
•
Environmental regulations, including those related to CO2 emissions, or other actions taken by the EPA, could result in significant increases in capital expenditures and operating costs. Certain of these regulations are being challenged through litigation, are being reviewed or recommended for repeal by the EPA or new replacement or alternative regulations are being contemplated or proposed by the EPA and state regulators; therefore, the ultimate implementation of any of these regulations,
as well as the timing of any such implementation, is uncertain. However, the individual or combined effects of existing and new environmental regulations could result in significant capital expenditures, increased operating costs, or the closure or alteration of some of Ameren Missouri’s coal-fired energy centers. Ameren Missouri’s capital expenditures are subject to MoPSC prudence reviews, which could result in cost disallowances as well as regulatory lag. The cost of Ameren Illinois’ purchased power and natural gas purchased for resale could increase. However, Ameren Illinois expects that these costs would be recovered from customers with no material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial position, or liquidity. Ameren’s and Ameren Missouri’s earnings could benefit from increased investment to comply with environmental regulations if those investments are reflected and recovered on a timely basis in customer rates.
•
The
Ameren Companies have multiyear credit agreements that cumulatively provide $2.1 billion of credit through December 2022, subject to a 364-day repayment term for Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois, with the option to seek incremental commitments to increase the cumulative credit provided to $2.5 billion. See Note 4 – Short-term Debt and Liquidity under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional information regarding the Credit Agreements. Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois believe that their liquidity is adequate given their expected operating cash flows, capital expenditures, and related financing plans. However, there can be no assurance that significant changes in economic conditions, disruptions in the capital and credit markets, or other unforeseen events will not materially affect their ability to execute their expected operating, capital, or financing plans.
•
Federal
income tax legislation enacted under the TCJA will continue to have significant impacts on our results of operations, financial position, liquidity, and financial metrics. The TCJA, among other things, reduced the federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. Customer rates were reduced to reflect the lower income tax rate, without a corresponding reduction in income tax payments because of our use of net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards until about 2020. Customer rates were also reduced to reflect the return of excess deferred taxes. The result of these customer rate reductions is a decrease in operating cash flows in the near term. Over time, the decrease in operating cash flows will be offset as temporary differences between book and taxable income reverse, and by increased customer rates due to higher rate base amounts resulting from lower accumulated deferred
income tax liabilities.
•
Ameren Missouri expects a decrease in operating cash flows of approximately $100 million in 2019 compared with 2018, as a result of the TCJA. Over time, the decrease in operating cash flows will be offset as temporary differences between book and taxable income reverse, and by increased customer rates due to higher rate base amounts, once approved by the MoPSC, resulting from lower accumulated deferred income tax liabilities.
•
The following table presents the net regulatory liabilities associated
with excess deferred taxes as of December 31, 2018, and the related amortization periods:
Amortization Period
Ameren Missouri
Ameren Illinois
ATXI
Total
30 – 60
years
$
947
$
796
$
84
$
1,827
7 – 10
years
524
(4
)
2
522
Total
$
1,471
$
792
$
86
$
2,349
•
In
2018, our rate-regulated businesses began to amortize excess deferred taxes. Ameren Illinois and ATXI's 2018 income tax expense reflect a full year of amortization, while Ameren Missouri's 2018 income tax expense reflects five months of amortization related to its electric business, in accordance with a MoPSC order received in July 2018. The amortization of such balances related to Ameren Missouri’s gas business started in January 2019, in accordance with a MoPSC order received in December 2018. These amortizations reduce our income tax expense and effective tax rates. Due to formula ratemaking, Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution and Ameren Transmission have an offsetting reduction in revenue from customers, with no overall impact on earnings. Ameren Missouri and Ameren
Illinois Natural Gas 2019 interim period earnings may be affected by timing differences between income tax expense and revenue reductions based on their revenue patterns; however, no material impact to year-over-year earnings is expected.
•
As of December 31, 2018, Ameren had $91 million in tax benefits from federal and state net operating loss carryforwards and $127 million in federal and state income tax credit carryforwards. These carryforwards are expected to largely offset income tax obligations in 2019. Ameren does not expect to make material federal or state income tax payments over the next five years based on planned capital
expenditures and related income tax credits. Consistent with the tax allocation agreement between Ameren (parent) and its subsidiaries, Ameren Missouri expects to make material income tax payments to Ameren (parent) in 2019 and 2020 and immaterial payments in 2021 through 2023 based on planned capital expenditures and related income tax credits, while Ameren Illinois expects to make material income tax payments to Ameren (parent) in 2020 through 2023.
•
Ameren expects its cash used for currently planned capital expenditures and dividends to exceed cash provided by operating activities over the next several years. To fund a portion of these cash requirements, beginning in the first quarter of 2018, Ameren began using newly issued shares, rather
than market-purchased shares, to satisfy requirements under its DRPlus and employee benefit plans and expects to continue to do so over the next five years. Ameren also plans to issue incremental common equity to fund a portion of Ameren Missouri’s wind generation investments. Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois expect their respective equity to total capitalization levels over the period ending December 2023 to remain in-line with their respective equity to total capitalization levels as of December 31, 2018. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois expect to fund cash flow needs through debt issuances, adjustments of dividends to Ameren (parent), and/or capital contributions from Ameren (parent).
The above items could have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Additionally, in the ordinary course of business, we evaluate strategies to enhance our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity. These strategies may include acquisitions, divestitures, opportunities to reduce costs or increase revenues, and other strategic initiatives to increase Ameren’s shareholder value. We are unable to predict which, if any, of these initiatives will be executed. The execution of these initiatives may have a material impact on our future results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.
REGULATORY MATTERS
See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
Preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures in compliance with GAAP requires the application of appropriate technical accounting rules and guidance, as well as the use of estimates. These estimates involve judgments regarding many factors that in and of themselves could materially affect the financial statements and disclosures. We have outlined below the critical accounting estimates that we believe are the most difficult, subjective, or complex. Any change in the assumptions or judgments applied in determining the following matters, among others, could have a material impact on future financial results.
Accounting
Estimate
Uncertainties Affecting Application
Regulatory Mechanisms and Cost Recovery
We defer costs and recognize revenues that we intend to collect in future rates.
•
Regulatory
environment and external regulatory decisions and requirements
•
Anticipated future regulatory decisions and our assessment of their impact
•
The impact of prudence reviews, complaint cases, limitations on electric rate increases in Missouri, and opposition during the ratemaking process that may limit our ability to timely recover costs and earn a fair return on our investments
•
Ameren
Illinois’ assessment of and ability to estimate the current year’s electric distribution service costs to be reflected in revenues and recovered from customers in a subsequent year under performance-based formula ratemaking framework
•
Ameren Illinois’ and ATXI’s assessment of and ability to estimate the current year’s electric transmission service costs to be reflected in revenues and recovered from customers in a subsequent year under the FERC ratemaking frameworks
•
Ameren Missouri’s estimate of revenue recovery under
the MEEIA plans
Basis for Judgment
The application of accounting guidance for rate-regulated businesses results in recording regulatory assets and liabilities. Regulatory assets represent the deferral of incurred costs that are probable of future recovery in customer rates. Regulatory assets are amortized as the incurred costs are recovered through customer rates. In some cases, we record regulatory assets before approval for recovery has been received from the applicable regulatory commission. We must use judgment to conclude that costs deferred as regulatory assets are probable of future recovery. We base our conclusion on certain factors including, but not limited to, orders issued by our regulatory commissions, legislation, or historical experience, as well as discussions with legal counsel. If facts
and circumstances lead us to conclude that a recorded regulatory asset is no longer probable of recovery or that plant assets are probable of disallowance, we record a charge to earnings, which could be material. Regulatory liabilities represent revenues received from customers to fund expected costs that have not yet been incurred or that are probable of future refunds to customers. We also recognize revenues for alternative revenue programs authorized by our regulators that allow for an automatic rate adjustment, are probable of recovery, and are collected within 24 months following the end of the annual period in which they are recognized. Ameren Illinois estimates its annual electric distribution revenue requirement under performance-based formula ratemaking for interim periods by using internal forecasted rate base and published forecasted data regarding the annual average of the monthly yields of the 30-year United States Treasury bonds. Ameren Illinois estimates
its annual revenue requirement as of December 31 of each year using that year’s actual operating results and assesses the probability of recovery from or refund to customers that the ICC will order at the end of the following year. Variations in investments made or orders by the ICC or courts can result in a subsequent change in Ameren Illinois’ estimate. Ameren Illinois and ATXI follow a similar process for their FERC rate-regulated electric transmission businesses. Ameren Missouri estimates electric margins resulting from its MEEIA customer energy-efficiency programs. Ameren Missouri uses a MEEIA rider to collect from, or refund to, customers any annual difference in the actual amounts incurred and the amounts collected from customers. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of this report for quantification of these assets or liabilities for each of the Ameren Companies. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies under Part II,
Item 8, of this report for a listing of regulatory mechanisms used by Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois.
Based on actuarial calculations, we accrue costs of providing future employee benefits for the benefit plans we offer our employees. See Note 10 – Retirement Benefits under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
•
Future
rate of return on pension and other plan assets
•
Valuation inputs and assumptions used in the fair value measurements of plan assets, excluding those inputs that are readily observable
•
Discount rate
•
Future compensation increase assumption
•
Health
care cost trend rates
•
Timing of employee retirements and mortality assumptions
•
Ability to recover certain benefit plan costs from our customers
•
Changing market conditions that may affect investment and interest rate environments
Basis
for Judgment
Ameren has defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans covering substantially all of its union employees. Ameren has defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all of its non-union employees and postretirement benefit plans covering non-union employees hired before October 2015. Our ultimate selection of the discount rate, health care trend rate, and expected rate of return on pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets is based on our consistent application of assumption-setting methodologies and our review of available historical, current, and projected rates, as applicable. We also make mortality assumptions to estimate our pension and other postretirement benefit obligations. See Note 10 – Retirement Benefits under Part II, Item 8, of this report for these assumptions and the sensitivity of Ameren’s benefit plans to potential changes in these assumptions.
Accounting
for Contingencies
We make judgments and estimates in the recording and the disclosing of liabilities for claims, litigation, environmental remediation, the actions of various regulatory agencies, or other matters that occur in the normal course of business. We record a loss contingency when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and that the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
•
Estimating financial impact of events
•
Estimating
likelihood of various potential outcomes
•
Regulatory and political environments and requirements
•
Outcome of legal proceedings, settlements, or other factors
•
Changes in regulation, expected scope of work, technology or timing of environmental remediation
Basis
for Judgment
The determination of a loss contingency requires significant judgment as to the expected outcome of the contingency in future periods. In making the determination as to the amount of potential loss and the probability of loss, we consider the nature of the litigation, the claim or assessment, opinions or views of legal counsel, and the expected outcome of potential litigation, among other things. If no estimate is better than another within our range of estimates, we record as our best estimate of a loss the minimum value of our estimated range of outcomes. As additional information becomes available, we reassess the potential liability related to the contingency and revise our estimates. The amount recorded for any contingency may differ from actual costs incurred when the contingency is resolved. Contingencies are normally resolved over long periods of time. In our evaluation of legal matters, management consults
with legal counsel and relies on analysis of relevant case law and legal precedents. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters, Note 9 – Callaway Energy Center, and Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item 8, of this report for information on the Ameren Companies’ contingencies.
Accounting for Income Taxes
We record a provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and a valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets, if any. See Note 12 – Income Taxes under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
•
Changes
in business, industry, laws, technology, or economic and market conditions affecting forecasted financial condition and/or results of operations
•
Estimates of the amount and character of future taxable income and forecasted use of our tax credit carryforwards
•
Enacted tax rates applicable to taxable income in years in which temporary differences are recovered or settled
•
Effectiveness
of implementing tax planning strategies
•
Changes in income tax laws, including amounts subject to income tax, and the regulatory treatment of any tax reform changes
•
Results of audits and examinations by taxing authorities
The reporting of tax-related assets and liabilities requires the use of estimates and significant management judgment. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded to represent future effects on income taxes for temporary differences between the basis of assets for financial reporting and tax purposes. Although management believes that current estimates for deferred tax assets and liabilities are reasonable, actual results could differ from these estimates for a variety of reasons, including: a change in forecasted financial condition and/or results of operations; changes in income tax laws, enacted tax rates or amounts subject to income tax; the form, structure, and timing of asset or stock sales or dispositions; changes in the regulatory treatment of any tax reform benefits; and changes resulting from audits and examinations by taxing authorities. Valuation allowances against deferred tax assets are recorded
when management concludes it is more likely than not such asset will not be realized in future periods. Accounting for income taxes also requires that only tax benefits for positions taken or expected to be taken on tax returns that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold can be recognized or continue to be recognized. Management evaluates each position solely on the technical merits and facts and circumstances of the position, assuming that the position will be examined by a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. Significant judgment is required to determine recognition thresholds and the related amount of tax benefits to be recognized. At each period end, and as new developments occur, management reevaluates its tax positions. See Note 12 – Income Taxes under Part II, Item 8, of this report for the amount of deferred income taxes recorded at December 31,
2018.
Impact of New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
EFFECTS OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES
Ameren’s rates for retail electric and natural gas utility service are regulated by the MoPSC and the ICC. Nonretail electric rates are regulated by the FERC. Rate regulation is generally based on the recovery of historical or projected costs. As a result, revenue increases could lag behind changing prices. The current replacement cost of our utility plant substantially exceeds our recorded historical cost. Under existing regulatory practice, only the historical cost of plant is recoverable from customers. As a result,
customer rates designed to provide recovery of historical costs through depreciation might not be adequate to replace plant in future years.
Ameren Illinois participates in performance-based formula ratemaking for its electric distribution business and its electric energy-efficiency investments. Within Ameren Illinois’ formula ratemaking mechanisms, the annual average of the monthly yields of the 30-year United States Treasury bonds are the basis for Ameren Illinois’ return on equity. Therefore, there is a direct correlation between the yield of United States Treasury bonds, which are affected by inflation, and the annual return on equity applicable to Ameren Illinois’ electric distribution business and electric energy-efficiency investments. Ameren Illinois’ and ATXI’s electric transmission rates are determined pursuant to formula ratemaking. Additionally,
Ameren Illinois and ATXI use a company-specific, forward-looking formula ratemaking framework in setting their transmission rates. These forward-looking rates are updated each January with forecasted information. A reconciliation during the year, which adjusts for the actual revenue requirement and for actual sales volumes, is used to adjust billing rates in a subsequent year.
Ameren Missouri recovers the cost of fuel for electric generation and the cost of purchased power by adjusting rates as allowed through the FAC. However, the FAC excludes substantially all transmission revenues and charges. Ameren Missouri is therefore exposed to transmission charges to the extent that they exceed transmission revenues. Ameren Illinois is required to purchase all of its expected power supply through procurement processes administered by the IPA. The cost of procured power can be affected by inflation. Ameren Illinois recovers power supply
costs from electric customers by adjusting rates through a rider mechanism to accommodate changes in power prices.
In our Missouri and Illinois retail natural gas utility jurisdictions, changes in natural gas costs are generally reflected in billings to natural gas customers through PGA clauses.
See Part I, Item 1, and Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional information on our cost recovery mechanisms.
ITEM 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk is the risk
of changes in value of a physical asset or a financial instrument, derivative or nonderivative, caused by fluctuations in market variables such as interest rates, commodity prices, and equity security prices. A derivative is a contract whose value is dependent on, or derived from, the value of some underlying asset or index. The following discussion of our risk management activities includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. We handle market risks in accordance with established policies, which may include entering into various derivative transactions. In the normal course of business, we also face risks that are either nonfinancial or nonquantifiable. Such risks, principally business, legal, and operational risks, are not part of the following discussion.
Our risk management objectives are to optimize our physical generating assets and to pursue market opportunities within prudent risk parameters. Our risk management policies are set by a risk management steering committee, which is composed of senior-level Ameren officers, with Ameren board of directors’ oversight.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to market risk through changes in interest rates associated with:
•
long-term and short-term variable-rate debt;
•
fixed-rate
debt;
•
United States Treasury bonds; and
•
the discount rate applicable to asset retirement obligations, goodwill, and defined pension and postretirement benefit plans.
We manage our interest rate exposure by controlling the amount of debt instruments within our total capitalization portfolio and by monitoring the effects of market changes on interest rates. For defined pension and postretirement benefit plans, we control the duration and the portfolio mix
of our plan assets. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 10 – Retirement Benefits under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional information related to asset retirement obligations, goodwill, and the defined pension and postretirement benefit plans.
The estimated increase in our annual interest expense and decrease in net income if interest rates were to increase by 100 basis points on variable-rate debt outstanding at December 31, 2018 is immaterial.
The return on equity component under Ameren Illinois’ electric distribution service and its electric energy-efficiency investments formula ratemaking recovery mechanisms is equal to the annual average of the monthly yields of the 30-year United States Treasury bonds plus 580 basis points.
Therefore, Ameren Illinois’ annual return on equity for its electric distribution business is directly correlated to the yields on such bonds, which are outside of Ameren Illinois’ control. A 50 basis point change in the annual average of the monthly yields of the 30-year United States Treasury bonds would result in an estimated $8 million change in Ameren’s and Ameren Illinois’ net income, based on its 2019 projected rate base. Interest rate levels also influence the return on equity allowed by our regulators in our other ratemaking jurisdictions.
Credit Risk
Credit risk represents the loss that would be recognized if counterparties should fail to perform as contracted. Exchange-traded contracts are supported by the financial
and credit quality of the clearing members of the respective exchanges and carry only a nominal credit risk. In all other transactions, we are exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to the transaction. See Note 7 – Derivative Financial Instruments under Part II, Item 8, of this report for information on the potential loss on counterparty exposure as of December 31, 2018.
Our revenues are primarily derived from sales or delivery of electricity and natural gas to customers in Missouri and Illinois. Our physical and financial instruments are subject to credit risk consisting of trade accounts receivables and executory contracts with market risk exposures. The risk associated with trade receivables is mitigated by the large number of customers in a broad range of industry groups who make up our customer
base. At December 31, 2018, no nonaffiliated customer represented more than 10% of our accounts receivable. Additionally, Ameren Illinois faces risks associated with the purchase of receivables. The Illinois Public Utilities Act requires Ameren Illinois to establish electric utility consolidated billing and purchase of receivables services. At the option of an alternative retail electric supplier, Ameren Illinois may be required to purchase the supplier’s receivables relating to Ameren Illinois’ distribution customers who elected to receive power supply from the alternative retail electric supplier. When that option is selected, Ameren Illinois produces consolidated bills for the applicable retail customers to reflect charges for electric distribution and purchased receivables. As of December 31, 2018,
Ameren Illinois’ balance of purchased accounts receivable associated with the utility consolidated billing and purchase of receivables services was $33 million. The risk associated with Ameren Illinois’ electric and natural gas trade receivables is also mitigated by a rate adjustment mechanism that allows Ameren Illinois to recover the difference between its actual net bad debt write-offs under GAAP and the amount of net bad debt write-offs included in its base rates. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois continue to monitor the impact of increasing rates on customer collections, as applicable. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois make adjustments to their respective allowance for doubtful accounts as deemed necessary to ensure that such allowances are adequate to cover estimated uncollectible customer account balances.
Investment Price Risk
Plan
assets of the pension and postretirement trusts, the nuclear decommissioning trust fund, and company-owned life insurance contracts include equity and debt securities. The equity securities are exposed to price fluctuations in equity markets. The debt securities are exposed to changes in interest rates.
Our costs for providing defined benefit retirement and postretirement benefit plans are dependent upon a number of factors, including the rate of return on plan assets. Ameren manages plan assets in accordance with the “prudent investor” guidelines contained in ERISA. Ameren’s goal is to ensure that sufficient funds are available to provide benefits
at the time they are payable, while also maximizing total return on plan assets and minimizing expense volatility consistent with its tolerance for risk. Ameren delegates investment management to specialists. Where appropriate, Ameren provides the investment manager with guidelines that specify allowable and prohibited investment types. Ameren regularly monitors manager performance and compliance with investment guidelines.
The expected return on plan assets assumption is based on historical and projected rates of return for current and planned asset classes in the investment portfolio. Projected rates of return for each asset class are estimated after an analysis of historical experience, future expectations, and the volatility of the various asset classes. After considering the target asset allocation for each asset class, we adjust the overall expected rate of return for the portfolio for historical and expected experience
of active portfolio management results compared with benchmark returns, and for the effect of expenses paid from plan assets. Contributions to the plans and future costs could increase materially if we do not achieve pension and postretirement asset portfolio investment returns equal to or in excess of our 2019 assumed return on plan assets of 7.00%.
Ameren Missouri also maintains a trust fund, as required by the NRC and Missouri law, to fund certain costs of nuclear plant decommissioning. As of December 31, 2018, this fund was invested in domestic equity securities (62%) and debt securities (37%). By maintaining a portfolio that includes long-term
equity investments, Ameren Missouri seeks to maximize the returns to be used to fund nuclear decommissioning costs within acceptable parameters of risk. Ameren Missouri actively monitors the portfolio by benchmarking the performance of its investments against certain indices and by maintaining and periodically reviewing established target allocation percentages of the trust assets to various investment options. Ameren Missouri’s exposure to equity price market risk is in large part mitigated because Ameren Missouri is currently allowed to recover its decommissioning costs, which would include unfavorable investment results, through electric rates.
Additionally, Ameren and Ameren Illinois have company-owned life insurance contracts with net asset values of $131 million and $9 million, respectively, as of December 31,
2018. Changes in the market values of these contracts are reflected in earnings.
Commodity Price Risk
Ameren Missouri’s and Ameren Illinois’ electric and natural gas distribution businesses exposure to changing market prices for commodities is in large part mitigated by the fact that there are cost recovery mechanisms in place. These cost recovery mechanisms allow Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois to pass on to retail customers prudently incurred costs for fuel, purchased power, and natural gas supply.
Ameren Missouri’s and Ameren Illinois’ strategy is designed to reduce the effect of market fluctuations for their customers. The effects of price volatility cannot be eliminated. However, procurement and sales strategies involve risk management techniques and instruments, as well as the management
of physical assets.
Ameren Missouri has a FAC that allows it to recover or refund, through customer rates, 95% of the variance in net energy costs from the amount set in base rates without a traditional rate proceeding, subject to MoPSC prudence reviews. Ameren Missouri remains exposed to the remaining 5% of such changes.
Ameren Illinois has cost recovery mechanisms for power purchased, capacity, and zero emission credit and renewable energy credit costs and expects full recovery of such costs. Ameren Illinois is required to serve as the provider of last resort for electric customers in its service territory who have not chosen an alternative retail electric supplier. In 2018, Ameren Illinois supplied power for 23% of its kilowatthour sales to its electric customers. Ameren Illinois purchases energy and capacity through MISO and through bilateral contracts resulting from IPA procurement
events. The IPA has proposed and the ICC has approved multiple procurement events covering portions of years through 2020 for capacity and 2021 for energy. Ameren Illinois has also entered into ICC-approved contracts for zero emission credits through 2026 and for renewable energy credits with 15-year terms commencing on the date of first renewable energy credit delivery. Ameren Illinois does not generate earnings based on the resale of power or purchase of zero emission credits or renewable energy credits but rather on the delivery of the energy.
Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois have PGA clauses that permit costs incurred for natural gas to be recovered directly from utility customers without a traditional rate proceeding, subject to prudence review.
The following table presents, as of December 31, 2018,
the percentages of the projected required supply of coal and coal transportation for Ameren Missouri's coal-fired energy centers, nuclear fuel for Ameren Missouri’s Callaway energy center, natural gas for Ameren Missouri's retail distribution and purchased power for Ameren Illinois that are price-hedged over the period 2019 through 2023. The projected required supply of these commodities could be significantly affected by changes in our assumptions about customer demand for our electric generation and our electric and natural gas distribution services, generation output, and inventory levels, among other matters.
Represents
the percentage of natural gas price-hedged for peak winter season of November through March. The year 2019 represents January 2019 through March 2019. The year 2020 represents November 2019 through March 2020. This continues each successive year through March 2023.
(b)
Represents the percentage of purchased power price-hedged for fixed-price residential and non-residential customers with less than 150 kilowatts of demand.
Our exposure to commodity price risk for construction and maintenance activities is related to changes in market prices for metal commodities and to labor availability.
Also see Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies
under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional information.
Commodity Supplier Risk
The use of ultra-low-sulfur coal is part of Ameren Missouri’s environmental compliance strategy. Ameren Missouri has agreements with multiple suppliers to purchase ultra-low-sulfur coal through 2022 to comply with environmental regulations. Disruptions to the deliveries of ultra-low-sulfur coal from a supplier could compromise Ameren Missouri’s ability to operate in compliance with emission standards. The suppliers of ultra-low-sulfur coal are limited, and the construction of pollution control equipment requires significant lead time. If Ameren Missouri were to experience a temporary disruption of ultra-low-sulfur coal deliveries that caused it to exhaust its existing inventory, and if other sources of ultra-low-sulfur coal were not available, Ameren Missouri would have to use its existing emission
allowances, purchase emission allowances to achieve compliance with environmental regulations, or purchase power necessary to meet demand.
Currently, the Callaway energy center uses nuclear fuel assemblies of a design fabricated by only a single supplier. That supplier is currently the only NRC-licensed supplier able to provide fuel assemblies to the Callaway energy center. Ameren Missouri is pursuing a program to qualify an alternate NRC-licensed supplier, and expects to obtain NRC approval in 2021.
Fair Value of Contracts
We use derivatives principally to manage the risk of changes in market prices for natural gas and power, as well as the risk of changes in rail transportation surcharges through fuel oil hedges. The following table presents the favorable (unfavorable)
changes in the fair value of all derivative contracts marked-to-market during the year ended December 31, 2018. We use various methods to determine the fair value of our contracts. In accordance with authoritative accounting guidance for fair value hierarchy levels, the sources we used to determine the fair value of these contracts were active quotes (Level 1), inputs corroborated by market data (Level 2), and other modeling and valuation methods that are not corroborated by market data (Level 3). See Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional information regarding the methods used to determine the fair value of these contracts.
Ameren
Missouri
Ameren
Illinois
Ameren
Fair
value of contracts at beginning of year, net assets (liabilities)
$
8
$
(217
)
$
(209
)
Contracts realized or otherwise settled during the period
(8
)
25
17
Fair
value of new contracts entered into during the period
(7
)
2
(5
)
Other changes in fair value
(3
)
(4
)
(7
)
Fair
value of contracts outstanding at end of year, net assets (liabilities)
The following table presents maturities of derivative contracts as of December 31, 2018, based on the hierarchy levels used to determine the fair value of the contracts:
Sources of Fair Value
2019
2020
– 2021
2022 – 2023
2024 and Thereafter
Total
Fair Value
Ameren Missouri:
Level
1
$
—
$
(1
)
$
—
$
—
$
(1
)
Level
2(a)
(4
)
(1
)
—
—
(5
)
Level
3(b)
(1
)
(3
)
—
—
(4
)
Total
$
(5
)
$
(5
)
$
—
$
—
$
(10
)
Ameren
Illinois:
Level
1
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
Level
2(a)
(5
)
(3
)
—
—
(8
)
Level
3(b)
(16
)
(30
)
(30
)
(110
)
(186
)
Total
$
(21
)
$
(33
)
$
(30
)
$
(110
)
$
(194
)
Ameren:
Level
1
$
—
$
(1
)
$
—
$
—
$
(1
)
Level
2(a)
(9
)
(4
)
—
—
(13
)
Level
3(b)
(17
)
(33
)
(30
)
(110
)
(190
)
Total
$
(26
)
$
(38
)
$
(30
)
$
(110
)
$
(204
)
(a)
Principally
fixed-price vs. floating over-the-counter power swaps, power forwards, and fixed-price vs. floating over-the-counter natural gas swaps.
(b)
Principally power forward contract values based on information from external sources, historical results, and our estimates. Level 3 also includes option contract values based on an option valuation model.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Ameren Corporation:
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ameren Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related consolidated statements of
income and comprehensive income, of shareholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, including the related notes and financial statement schedules listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31,
2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or
fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
We have served as the Company’s auditor since at least 1932. We have not been able to determine the specific year we began serving as auditor of the Company.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Union Electric Company:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Union Electric Company (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related statements of income, of shareholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, including the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred
to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered
with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have served as the Company’s auditor since at least 1932. We have not been able to determine the specific year we began serving as auditor of the Company.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Ameren Illinois Company:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We
have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Ameren Illinois Company (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related statements of income and comprehensive income, of shareholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, including the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits of these financial statements
in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
General
Ameren, headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, is a public utility holding company whose primary assets are its equity interests in its subsidiaries. Ameren’s
subsidiaries are separate, independent legal entities with separate businesses, assets, and liabilities. Dividends on Ameren’s common stock and the payment of expenses by Ameren depend on distributions made to it by its subsidiaries. Ameren’s principal subsidiaries are listed below. Ameren also has other subsidiaries that conduct other activities, such as providing shared services.
•
Union Electric Company, doing business as Ameren Missouri, operates a rate-regulated electric generation, transmission, and distribution business and a rate-regulated natural gas distribution business in Missouri. Ameren Missouri was incorporated in Missouri in 1922 and is successor to a number of companies, the oldest of which was organized in 1881. It is the
largest electric utility in the state of Missouri. It supplies electric and natural gas service to a 24,000-square-mile area in central and eastern Missouri, which includes the Greater St. Louis area. Ameren Missouri supplies electric service to 1.2 million customers and natural gas service to 0.1 million customers.
•
Ameren Illinois Company, doing business as Ameren Illinois, operates rate-regulated electric transmission, electric distribution, and natural gas distribution businesses in Illinois. Ameren Illinois was incorporated in Illinois in 1923 and is the successor to a number of companies, the oldest of
which was organized in 1902. Ameren Illinois supplies electric and natural gas utility service to a 40,000 square mile area in central and southern Illinois. Ameren Illinois supplies electric service to 1.2 million customers and natural gas service to 0.8 million customers.
•
Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois, doing business as ATXI, operates a FERC rate-regulated electric transmission business. ATXI was incorporated in Illinois in 2006. ATXI is constructing MISO-approved electric transmission projects, including the Illinois Rivers
and Mark Twain projects, and operates the Spoon River project, which was placed in service in February 2018. Ameren also evaluates competitive electric transmission investment opportunities as they arise.
Ameren’s financial statements are prepared on a consolidated basis and therefore include the accounts of its majority-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois have no subsidiaries. All tabular dollar amounts are in millions, unless otherwise indicated.
Our accounting policies conform to GAAP. Our financial statements reflect all adjustments (which include normal, recurring adjustments) that are necessary, in our opinion, for a fair presentation of our results. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions. Such estimates
and assumptions affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Regulation
We are regulated by the MoPSC, the ICC, and the FERC. We defer certain costs as assets pursuant to actions of rate regulators or because of expectations that we will be able to recover such costs in future rates charged to customers. We also defer certain amounts as liabilities pursuant to actions of rate regulators or based on the expectation that such amounts will be returned to customers in future rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are amortized consistent with the period of expected regulatory treatment. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois have various rate-adjustment mechanisms
in place that provide for the recovery of purchased natural gas and electric fuel and purchased power costs without a traditional regulatory rate review.
In Ameren Missouri’s and Ameren Illinois’ natural gas businesses, changes in natural gas costs are reflected in billings to their respective customers through PGA clauses. The difference between actual natural gas costs and costs billed to customers in a given period is deferred as a regulatory asset or liability. The deferred amount is either billed or refunded to customers in a subsequent period.
Ameren Missouri has a FAC that allows an adjustment of electric rates three times per year, without a traditional rate proceeding, for a pass-through to customers of 95% of the variance in net energy costs from the amount set in base rates, subject to MoPSC prudence review. The difference between
the actual amounts incurred for these items and the amounts recovered from Ameren Missouri customers’ base rates is deferred as a regulatory asset or liability. The deferred amounts are either billed or refunded to customers in a subsequent period.
In Ameren Illinois’ electric distribution business, changes in purchased power and transmission service costs are reflected in billings to its customers through pass-through rate-adjustment clauses. The difference between actual purchased power and transmission service costs and costs billed to customers in a given period is deferred as a regulatory asset or liability. The deferred amount is either billed or refunded
to customers in a subsequent period.
In addition to the rate-adjustment mechanisms discussed above, Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois have approvals from rate regulators to use other cost recovery mechanisms. Ameren Missouri has a pension and postretirement benefit cost tracker, an uncertain tax position tracker, a tracker on certain excess deferred taxes, a renewable energy standards cost tracker, a solar rebate program tracker, PISA, and a RESRAM. Ameren Illinois’ and ATXI’s electric transmission rates are determined pursuant to formula ratemaking. Ameren Illinois participates in performance-based formula ratemaking for its electric distribution business and its electric energy-efficiency investments. Ameren Illinois also has environmental cost riders, an asbestos-related litigation rider, a natural gas energy-efficiency rider, a
QIP rider, a VBA rider, a bad debt rider, and cost recovery mechanisms for renewable energy credits and zero emission credits. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters for additional information on the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded at December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois continually assess the recoverability of their regulatory assets. Regulatory assets are charged to earnings when it is no longer probable that such amounts will be recovered through future revenues. To the extent that reductions in customers rates or refunds to customers related to regulatory liabilities are no longer probable, the amounts are credited to earnings.
Cash, Cash Equivalents,
and Restricted Cash
Cash and cash equivalents include short-term, highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents subject to legal or contractual restrictions and not readily available for use for general corporate purposes are classified as restricted cash.
In November 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that requires, including on a retrospective basis, restricted cash to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. Our adoption of this guidance, effective January 2018, did not result in material changes to previously reported cash flows from operating, investing, or financing activities. The changes in our restricted cash balances during the year ended December 31,
2018, were primarily reflected as increases in cash provided by operating activities as a result of our adoption of this guidance.
The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within the balance sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Restricted
cash included in “Other current assets”
13
4
6
21
5
6
Restricted
cash included in “Other assets”
74
—
74
35
—
35
Restricted
cash included in “Nuclear decommissioning trust fund”
4
4
—
2
2
—
Total
cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
$
107
$
8
$
80
$
68
$
7
$
41
Restricted
cash included in Ameren’s other current assets primarily represents participant funds from Ameren (parent)’s DRPlus and funds held by an irrevocable Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association (VEBA) trust, which provides health care benefits for active employees. Restricted cash included in Ameren Missouri’s and Ameren Illinois’ other current assets primarily represents funds held by the VEBA trust.
Restricted cash included in Ameren’s and Ameren Illinois’ other assets primarily represents amounts in a trust fund restricted for the use of funding certain asbestos-related claims and amounts collected under a cost recovery rider that are restricted for use in the procurement of renewable energy credits.
Accounts Receivable
“Accounts receivable – trade” on Ameren’s and Ameren Illinois’ balance sheets include certain receivables purchased
at a discount from alternative retail electric suppliers that elect to participate in the utility consolidated billing program. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, “Other current liabilities” on Ameren’s and Ameren Illinois’ balance sheets included payables for purchased receivables of $33 million and $31 million, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 the Ameren Companies recorded immaterial bad debt expense.
The allowance for doubtful accounts represents our estimate of existing accounts receivable that will ultimately be uncollectible. The allowance is calculated by applying estimated loss factors to various classes of outstanding receivables, including unbilled revenue. The loss factors used to estimate uncollectible accounts are based upon both historical collections experience and management’s estimate of future collections success given the existing and anticipated future collections environment. Ameren Illinois has a bad debt rider that adjusts rates for net write-offs of customer accounts receivable above or below those being collected in rates.
Inventories
Inventories are recorded at the lower of weighted-average
cost or net realizable value. Inventories are capitalized when purchased and then expensed as consumed or capitalized as property, plant, and equipment when installed, as appropriate. The following table presents a breakdown of inventories for each of the Ameren Companies at December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Ameren Missouri
Ameren Illinois
Ameren
2018
Fuel(a)
$
123
$
—
$
123
Natural
gas stored underground
7
64
71
Materials, supplies, and other
228
61
289
Total
inventories
$
358
$
125
$
483
2017
Fuel(a)
$
154
$
—
$
154
Natural
gas stored underground
8
74
82
Materials, supplies, and other
226
60
286
Total
inventories
$
388
$
134
$
522
(a)
Consists
of coal, oil, and propane.
Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net
We capitalize the cost of additions to, and betterments of, units of property, plant, and equipment. The cost includes labor, material, applicable taxes, and overhead. An allowance for funds used during construction, as discussed below, is also capitalized as a cost of our rate-regulated assets. Maintenance expenditures, including nuclear refueling and maintenance outages, are expensed as incurred. When units of depreciable property are retired, the original costs, less salvage values, are charged to accumulated depreciation. If environmental expenditures are related to assets currently in use, as in the case of the installation of pollution control equipment, the cost is capitalized and depreciated over the expected life of the asset. See Asset Retirement Obligations section below and Note 3 – Property,
Plant, and Equipment, Net for additional information.
Ameren Missouri’s cost of nuclear fuel is capitalized as a part of “Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net” on the balance sheet and then amortized to fuel expense on a unit-of-production basis. The cost is charged to “Operating Expenses – Fuel” in the statement of income.
Depreciation
Depreciation is provided over the estimated lives of the various classes of depreciable property by applying composite rates on a straight-line basis to the cost basis of such property. The provision for depreciation for the Ameren Companies in 2018, 2017, and 2016 ranged from 3% to 4%
of the average depreciable cost. See Note 3 – Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net for additional information on estimated depreciable lives.
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction
We capitalize allowance for funds used during construction, or the cost of borrowed funds and the cost of equity funds (preferred and common shareholders’ equity) applicable to rate-regulated construction expenditures, in accordance with the utility industry’s accounting practice and GAAP. Allowance for funds used during construction does not represent a current source of cash funds. This accounting practice offsets the effect on earnings of the cost of financing during construction, and it treats such financing costs in the same manner as construction charges for labor and materials.
Under accepted ratemaking practice, cash recovery of allowance for funds used during construction and other construction costs occurs when completed projects are placed in service and reflected in customer rates. The following table presents the average allowance for funds used during construction debt and equity blended rates that were applied to construction projects in 2018, 2017, and 2016:
2018
2017
2016
Ameren
Missouri
7
%
7
%
7
%
Ameren Illinois
5
%
4
%
5
%
Goodwill
Goodwill
represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Ameren and Ameren Illinois had goodwill of $411 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017. Ameren has four reporting units: Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Transmission. Ameren Illinois has three reporting units: Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Illinois Transmission. Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Illinois Transmission had goodwill of $238 million, $80 million, and $93
million, respectively, at December 31, 2018 and 2017. The Ameren Transmission reporting unit had the same $93 million of goodwill as the Ameren Illinois Transmission reporting unit at December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Ameren and Ameren Illinois evaluate goodwill for impairment in each of their reporting units as of October 31 each year, or more frequently if events and circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of their reporting units below their carrying
amounts. To determine whether the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not greater than its carrying amount, Ameren and Ameren Illinois elect to perform either a qualitative assessment or to bypass the qualitative assessment and perform a quantitative test, on an annual basis.
Ameren and Ameren Illinois elected to perform a qualitative assessment for their annual goodwill impairment test conducted as of October 31, 2018. The results of Ameren’s and Ameren Illinois’ qualitative assessment indicated that it was more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit significantly exceeded its carrying value as of October 31, 2018, resulting in no impairment of Ameren’s or Ameren Illinois’ goodwill. The following factors, among others, were considered by Ameren and Ameren Illinois when they assessed whether
it was more likely than not that the fair value of each of their reporting units exceeded its carrying value as of October 31, 2018:
•
macroeconomic conditions, including those conditions within Ameren Illinois’ service territory;
•
pending regulatory rate review outcomes and projections of future regulatory rate review outcomes;
•
changes
in laws and potential law changes;
•
observable industry market multiples;
•
achievement of IEIMA and FEJA performance metrics and the yield of the 30-year United States Treasury bonds;
•
changes in the FERC-allowed return on equity with respect to transmission services; and
•
projected
operating results and cash flows.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
We evaluate long-lived assets classified as held and used for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. Whether an impairment has occurred is determined by comparing the estimated undiscounted cash flows attributable to the assets to the carrying value of the assets. If the carrying value exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, we recognize an impairment charge equal to the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. In the period in which we determine that an asset meets held for sale criteria, we record an impairment charge to the extent the book value exceeds its estimated fair value less cost to sell. We did not identify any events or changes in circumstances that indicated that
the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable in 2018 and 2017.
Variable Interest Entities
As of December 31, 2018, Ameren and Ameren Missouri had interests in unconsolidated variable interest entities that were established to construct wind generation facilities and, ultimately, sell those constructed facilities to Ameren Missouri. Neither Ameren nor Ameren Missouri are the primary beneficiary of these variable interest entities because neither has the power to direct matters that most significantly affect the entities' activities, which include designing, financing, and constructing the wind generation facilities. As a result, these variable interest entities are not required to be consolidated. As of December 31,
2018, the maximum exposure to loss related to these variable interest entities was approximately $16 million, which represents the portion of interconnection study costs that may be incurred by Ameren and Ameren Missouri. The risk of a loss was assessed to be remote and, accordingly, Ameren and Ameren Missouri have not recognized a liability associated with any portion of the maximum exposure to loss. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters for additional information on the agreements to acquire these wind generation facilities.
As of December 31,
2018 and 2017, Ameren also had investments in unconsolidated variable interest entities totaling $22 million and $17 million, respectively, included in “Other assets” on Ameren’s consolidated balance sheet. These investments are accounted for as equity method investments. Ameren is not the primary beneficiary of these variable interest entities because it does not have the power to direct matters that most significantly affect the entities' activities. As a result, these variable interest entities are not required to be consolidated. As of December 31, 2018, the maximum exposure to loss related to these variable interest entities is limited to the investment
in these partnerships of $22 million plus associated outstanding funding commitments of $16 million.
Environmental Costs
Liabilities for environmental costs are recorded on an undiscounted basis when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Costs are expensed or deferred as a regulatory asset when it is expected that the costs will be recovered from customers in future rates.
Asset Retirement Obligations
We record the estimated fair value of legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets in the period in which the liabilities are incurred and capitalize a corresponding amount as part of the book value of
the related long-lived asset. In subsequent periods, we adjust AROs based on changes in the estimated fair values of the obligations with a corresponding increase or decrease in the asset book value. Asset book values, reflected within “Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net” on the balance sheet, are depreciated over the remaining useful life of the related asset. Due to regulatory recovery, that depreciation is deferred as a regulatory balance. The depreciation of the asset book values at Ameren Missouri was $14 million, $26 million, and $31 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, which was deferred as a
reduction to the net regulatory liability. The net regulatory liability also reflects deferrals of net realized and unrealized gains and losses within the nuclear decommissioning trust fund for the Callaway energy center. The depreciation deferred to the regulatory asset at Ameren Illinois was immaterial in each respective period. Uncertainties as to the probability, timing, or amount of cash expenditures associated with AROs affect our estimates of fair value. Ameren and Ameren Missouri have recorded AROs for retirement costs associated with Ameren Missouri’s Callaway energy center decommissioning, CCR facilities, and river structures. Also, Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois have recorded AROs for retirement costs associated with asbestos removal and the disposal of certain transformers. Asset removal costs that do not constitute legal obligations are classified as regulatory liabilities. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters.
The
following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending carrying amount of AROs for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Ameren
Missouri’s accretion expense was deferred as a decrease to regulatory liabilities.
(b)
Ameren Missouri changed its fair value estimate primarily because of an extension of the remediation period of certain CCR storage facilities, an update to the decommissioning of the Callaway energy center to reflect the cost study and funding analysis filed with the MoPSC in 2017, and an increase in the assumed discount rate.
(c)
Balance included $23 million and $6
million in “Other current liabilities” on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(d)
Included in “Other deferred credits and liabilities” on the balance sheet.
(e)
Ameren Missouri changed its fair value estimate primarily due to a reduction in the cost estimate
for closure of certain CCR storage facilities.
Company-owned Life Insurance
Ameren and Ameren Illinois have company-owned life insurance, which is recorded at the net cash surrender value. The net cash surrender value is the amount that can be realized under the insurance policies at the balance sheet date. As of December 31, 2018, the cash surrender value of company-owned life insurance at Ameren and Ameren Illinois was $244 million (December 31, 2017 – $265 million) and $122 million (December 31,
2017 – $129 million), respectively, while total borrowings against the policies were $113 million (December 31, 2017 – $120 million) at both Ameren and Ameren Illinois. Ameren and Ameren Illinois have the right to offset the borrowings against the cash surrender value of the policies and, consequently, present the net asset in “Other assets” on their respective balance sheets.
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, Ameren’s noncontrolling interests included the preferred stock of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois.
Operating Revenues
In the first quarter of 2018, we adopted authoritative accounting guidance related to revenue from contracts with customers using the full retrospective method, with no material changes to the amount or timing of revenue recognition. We record revenues from contracts with customers for various electric and natural gas services, which primarily consist of retail distribution, electric transmission, and off-system arrangements. When more than one performance obligation exists in a contract,
the consideration under the contract is allocated to the performance obligations based on the relative standalone selling price.
Electric and natural gas retail distribution revenues are earned when the commodity is delivered to our customers. We accrue an estimate of electric and natural gas retail distribution revenues for service provided but unbilled at the end of each accounting period.
Electric transmission revenues are earned as electric transmission services are provided.
Off-system revenues are primarily comprised of MISO revenues and wholesale bilateral revenues. MISO revenues include the sale of electricity, capacity, and ancillary services. Wholesale bilateral revenues include the sale of electricity and capacity. MISO-related electricity and wholesale bilateral electricity revenues are earned as electricity is delivered. MISO-related
capacity and ancillary service revenues and wholesale bilateral capacity revenues are earned as services are provided.
Retail distribution, electric transmission, and off-system revenues, including the underlying components described above, represent a series of goods or services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer over time to our customers. Revenues from contracts with customers are equal to the amounts billed and our estimate of electric and natural gas retail distribution services provided but unbilled at the end of each accounting period. Revenues are billed at least monthly, and payments are due less than one month after goods and/or services are provided. See Note 15 – Segment Information for disaggregated revenue information.
For certain regulatory recovery mechanisms that are alternative revenue programs rather than revenues from contracts
with customers, we recognize revenues that have been authorized for rate recovery, are objectively determinable and probable of recovery, and are expected to be collected from customers within two years from the end of the year. Our alternative revenue programs include revenue requirement reconciliations, MEEIA, and VBA. These revenues are subsequently recognized as revenues from contracts with customers when billed, with an offset to alternative revenue program revenues.
The Ameren Companies elected not to disclose the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the performance obligations that are unsatisfied as of the end of the reporting period for contracts with an initial expected term of one year or less. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017,
our remaining performance obligations were immaterial.
Accounting for MISO Transactions
MISO-related purchase and sale transactions are recorded by Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois using settlement information provided by MISO. Ameren Missouri records these purchase and sale transactions on a net hourly position. Ameren Missouri records net purchases in a single hour in “Operating Expenses – Purchased power” and net sales in a single hour in “Operating Revenues – Electric” in its statement of income. Ameren Illinois records net purchases in “Operating Expenses – Purchased power” in its statement of income to reflect all of its MISO transactions relating to the procurement of power for its customers. On occasion, Ameren Missouri’s and Ameren Illinois’ prior-period transactions will be resettled outside the routine settlement process because of a change
in MISO’s tariff or a material interpretation thereof. In these cases, Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois recognize expenses associated with resettlements once the resettlement is probable and the resettlement amount can be estimated. Revenues are recognized once the resettlement amount is received. There were no material MISO resettlements in 2018, 2017, or 2016.
Stock-based Compensation
Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award, net of an assumed forfeiture rate. Ameren recognizes as compensation expense the estimated fair value of stock-based compensation on a straight-line basis over the requisite vesting period. See Note 11 – Stock-based Compensation for additional information.
Deferred
Compensation
As of December 31, 2018, and 2017, “Other deferred credits and liabilities” on Ameren’s balance sheet included deferred compensation obligations of $80 million and $86 million, respectively, recorded at the present value of future benefits to be paid.
Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois collect from their
customers excise taxes, including municipal and state excise taxes and gross receipts taxes, that are levied on the sale or distribution of natural gas and electricity. The following table presents the excise taxes recorded on a gross basis in “Operating Revenues – Electric,”“Operating Revenues – Natural gas” and “Operating Expenses – Taxes other than income taxes” on the statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
2018
2017
2016
Ameren
Missouri
$
164
$
153
$
151
Ameren Illinois
118
112
(a)
108
(a)
Ameren
$
282
$
265
$
259
(a)
Amounts
have been adjusted from those previously reported to reflect additional excise taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Unamortized Debt Discounts, Premiums, and Issuance Costs
Long-term debt discounts, premiums, and issuance costs are amortized over the lives of the related issuances. Credit agreement fees are amortized over the term of the agreement.
Income Taxes
Ameren uses an asset and liability approach for its financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for transactions that are treated differently for financial reporting and income tax return purposes. These deferred tax assets and liabilities are based
on statutory tax rates.
We expect that regulators will reduce future revenues for deferred tax liabilities that were initially recorded at rates in excess of the current statutory rate. Therefore, reductions in certain deferred tax liabilities that were recorded because of decreases in the statutory rate have been credited to a regulatory liability. A regulatory asset has been established to recognize the probable recovery through future customer rates of tax benefits related to the equity component of allowance for funds used during construction, as well as the effects of tax rate increases. To the extent deferred tax balances are included in rate base, the revaluation of deferred taxes is recorded as a regulatory asset or liability on the balance sheet and will be collected from, or refunded to, customers. For deferred tax balances not included in rate base, the revaluation of deferred taxes is recorded as an adjustment to
income tax expense on the income statement. See Note 12 – Income Taxes for further information regarding the revaluation of deferred taxes related to the TCJA and Missouri and Illinois state corporate income tax rate changes.
Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois, and all the other Ameren subsidiary companies are parties to a tax allocation agreement with Ameren (parent) that provides for the allocation of consolidated tax liabilities. The tax allocation agreement specifies that each party be allocated an amount of tax using a stand-alone calculation, which is similar to that which would be owed or refunded had the party been separately subject to tax considering the impact of consolidation. Any net benefit attributable to Ameren (parent) is reallocated to the other parties. This reallocation is treated as a capital contribution to the party receiving the benefit. See Note 13 – Related-party Transactions for information regarding
capital contributions under the tax allocation agreement.
Earnings per Share
Earnings per basic and diluted share are computed by dividing “Net Income Attributable to Ameren Common Shareholders” by the weighted-average number of basic and diluted common shares outstanding, respectively, during the period. Earnings per diluted share reflects the potential dilution that would occur if certain stock-based performance share units and restricted stock units were settled. The number of shares from performance share units assumed to be settled was 2.0 million, 1.6 million, and 0.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,
and 2016, respectively. The number of shares from restricted stock units assumed to be settled was immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2018, and not applicable for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. There were no potentially dilutive securities excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.
Accounting Changes and Other Matters
The following is a summary of recently adopted authoritative accounting guidance, as well as guidance
issued but not yet adopted, that could affect the Ameren Companies.
In the first quarter of 2018, the Ameren Companies adopted authoritative accounting guidance on various topics. See the Operating Revenues section above for more information on our adoption of the guidance on revenue from contracts with customers. See Note 10 – Retirement Benefits for more information on our adoption of the guidance on the presentation of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit cost. See the Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash section above for more information on our adoption of the guidance on
restricted cash.
Our adoption of the guidance on the recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities did not have a material impact on our results of operations or financial position.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising from all leases with a term greater than one year. This guidance will affect the Ameren Companies’ financial position by increasing the assets and liabilities recorded relating to operating leases. Ameren expects both its assets and liabilities to increase by approximately $40 million, largely due to an increase at Ameren Missouri. We do not expect the impacts of this guidance to be material to our results of operations or cash flows. Consistent with current GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses
and cash flows arising from a lease will depend on its classification as a finance lease or operating lease. The guidance also requires additional disclosures to enable users of financial statements to understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. We will adopt this guidance using the January 1, 2019 effective date as the date of our application of the standard. No adjustment to comparative periods will be made. This guidance will be effective for the Ameren Companies in the first quarter of 2019. See Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies for additional information on our leases.
Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
In June 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that requires an entity to recognize an allowance for financial instruments that reflects its current estimate
of credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the financial instruments. The guidance requires an entity to measure expected credit losses using relevant information about past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectibility of the reported amount. We are currently assessing the impacts of this guidance on our results of operations, financial position, and disclosures. This guidance will be effective for the Ameren Companies in the first quarter of 2020, and will require changes to be applied retrospectively with a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the adoption date.
Fair Value Measurement Disclosures
In August 2018, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that affects disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. This guidance will be effective for the Ameren Companies in the first quarter
of 2020, with early adoption permitted. We are currently assessing the impacts of this guidance on our disclosures.
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosures
In August 2018, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that affects disclosure requirements for defined benefit plans. This guidance will be effective for the Ameren Companies in the fourth quarter of 2020, and will require changes to be applied retrospectively to each period presented. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently assessing the impacts of this guidance on our disclosures.
Implementation Costs Incurred in Certain Cloud Computing Arrangements
In August 2018, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in certain hosting arrangements with the requirements for capitalizing
implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. This guidance requires capitalized implementation costs to be expensed over the term of the hosting arrangement and presented in the same line item in the statement of income as the fees of the associated hosting arrangement. Capitalized implementation costs must be presented in the balance sheet in the same line item that a prepayment for the fees of the associated hosting arrangement would be presented, and payments for capitalized implementation costs must be classified in the statement of cash flows in the same manner as payments for hosting arrangement fees. The Ameren Companies early adopted this guidance in the third quarter of 2018 and applied the guidance prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. Implementation costs capitalized in 2018 were immaterial.
Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments
In
August 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that specifies the classification and presentation of certain cash flow items to reduce diversity in practice. This guidance was effective for the Ameren Companies in the first quarter of 2018 and was applied retrospectively. Our adoption of this guidance did not result in material changes to previously reported cash flows from operating, investing, or financing activities.
NOTE 2 – RATE AND REGULATORY MATTERS
Below is a summary of significant regulatory proceedings and related lawsuits. We are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of these matters, the timing of final decisions of the various agencies and courts, or the effect on our results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.
On June 1, 2018, Missouri Senate Bill 564 was enacted. The provision of the law applicable to the TCJA was effective immediately; the remaining provisions, including the ability to elect PISA, became effective August 28, 2018. The law required the MoPSC to authorize a reduction in Ameren Missouri’s rates to pass through the effect of the TCJA within 90 days of the law’s effective date. In July 2018, the MoPSC authorized Ameren Missouri to reduce its annual revenue requirement by $167 million and reflect that reduction in rates beginning August 1, 2018.
The reduction included $74 million for the amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes. In addition, Ameren Missouri recorded a reduction to revenue and a corresponding regulatory liability of $60 million for the excess amounts collected in rates related to the TCJA from January 1, 2018, through July 31, 2018. The regulatory liability will be reflected in customer rates over a period of time to be determined by the MoPSC in the next regulatory rate review.
Pursuant to its PISA election, Ameren Missouri is permitted to defer and recover 85% of the depreciation expense and a weighted-average cost of capital return on rate base on certain
property, plant, and equipment placed in service after September 1, 2018, and not included in base rates. The rate base on which the return is calculated incorporates qualifying capital expenditures since the PISA election date, and changes in total accumulated depreciation excluding retirements and plant-related deferred income taxes. The debt return on rate base is recognized in earnings as a reduction of “Interest Charges” until PISA deferrals are reflected in customer rates, while the equity return is recognized in earnings as “Operating Revenues – Electric” when billed to customers. Accumulated PISA deferrals earn carrying costs at the weighted-average cost of capital, and all approved PISA deferrals will be added to rate base prospectively and recovered over a period of 20 years following a regulatory rate review.
PISA mitigates the impacts of regulatory lag between regulatory rate reviews. The remaining 15% of certain property, plant, and equipment placed in service and not eligible for recovery under PISA, unless eligible for recovery under the RESRAM, remain subject to regulatory lag. See below for discussion of the RESRAM. Amounts deferred under PISA were immaterial as of December 31, 2018.
As a result of Ameren Missouri’s PISA election, additional provisions of Missouri law apply, including provisions limiting customer rate increases to a 2.85% compound annual growth rate in the average overall customer rate per kilowatthour, based on the electric rates that became effective in April 2017, less half
of the annual savings from the TCJA that was passed on to customers as approved in the July 2018 MoPSC order. Additionally, Ameren Missouri’s electric base rates, as determined in the July 2018 MoPSC order, are frozen until April 1, 2020. Customer rates under the MEEIA, the FAC, and the RESRAM riders have not been frozen. If rate changes from the FAC or the RESRAM riders would cause rates to temporarily exceed the 2.85% rate cap, the overage would be deferred for future recovery in the next regulatory rate review; however, rates established in such regulatory rate review will be subject to the rate cap. Any deferred overages approved for recovery will be recovered in a manner consistent with costs recovered under PISA. Excluding customer rates under the MEEIA rider, which are not subject to the rate cap, Ameren Missouri would incur a penalty equal to the amount of deferred overage that would cause
customer rates to exceed the 2.85% rate cap. Both the rate cap and PISA election are effective through December 2023, unless Ameren Missouri requests and receives MoPSC approval of an extension through December 2028.
Wind Generation Facilities and RESRAM
In the second quarter of 2018, Ameren Missouri entered into a build-transfer agreement with a subsidiary of Terra-Gen, LLC to acquire, after construction, a 400-megawatt wind generation facility, which is expected to be located in northeastern Missouri. In October 2018, the MoPSC issued an order approving a unanimous stipulation and agreement regarding a requested certificate of convenience and necessity for the facility. In December 2018, Ameren Missouri received FERC approval to acquire the facility after construction. A transmission interconnection
agreement with the MISO for this facility is expected in the fall of 2019. Also, in October 2018, Ameren Missouri entered into a build-transfer agreement with a subsidiary of EDF Renewables, Inc. to acquire, after construction, a wind generation facility of up to 157 megawatts. In February 2019, Ameren Missouri filed with the MoPSC a nonunanimous stipulation and agreement regarding a requested certificate of convenience and necessity for the facility. The up to 157-megawatt facility is expected to be located in northwestern Missouri. A transmission interconnection agreement with the MISO for this facility is expected in early 2020. Both facilities are expected to be completed by the end of 2020 and would help Ameren Missouri comply with the Missouri renewable energy standard. Each acquisition is subject to certain conditions, including entering into a MISO
transmission interconnection agreement at an acceptable cost for each facility and obtaining FERC approval and the issuance of a certificate of convenience and necessity by the MoPSC for the up to 157-megawatt facility, as well as other customary contract terms and conditions. These agreements collectively represent approximately $1 billion in capital expenditures expected in 2020, which is included in Ameren Missouri’s Smart Energy Plan.
As a part of its May 2018 filing, Ameren Missouri requested the MoPSC to authorize a proposed RESRAM that would allow Ameren Missouri to adjust customer rates on an annual basis without a traditional regulatory rate review. In October and December 2018, the MoPSC issued orders approving the RESRAM. In January 2019, the MoOPC filed an appeal with the Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, challenging the MoPSC’s December 2018 order allowing Ameren Missouri to recover, through the RESRAM,
the 15% of capital investment not recovered under PISA. Ameren Missouri expects a decision by the end of 2019. The RESRAM is designed to mitigate the impacts of
regulatory lag for the cost of compliance with renewable energy standards, including recovery of investments in wind and other renewable generation, by providing more timely recovery of costs and a return on investments not already provided for in customer rates or recovered under PISA. RESRAM regulatory assets earn carrying costs at short-term interest rates.
Renewable Choice Program
In
June 2018, the MoPSC approved Ameren Missouri’s Renewable Choice Program, which allows large commercial and industrial customers and municipalities to elect to receive up to 100% of their energy from renewable resources. The tariff-based program is designed to recover the costs of the election, net of changes in the market price of such energy. Based on customer contracts, the program enables Ameren Missouri to supply up to 400 megawatts of renewable wind energy generation, up to 200 megawatts of which it could own. As applicable, the addition of generation by Ameren Missouri would be subject to the issuance of a certificate of convenience and necessity by the MoPSC, obtaining transmission interconnection agreements with MISO or other RTOs, and FERC approval. Ameren Missouri anticipates
finalizing customer interest and pursuing renewable energy projects to fulfill requirements in 2019. Without extension, the option to elect into the program will terminate in the third quarter of 2023.
MEEIA
In July 2018, the Missouri Supreme Court overturned a 2016 decision by the Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, which had upheld a 2015 MoPSC order regarding the determination of a certain input used to calculate the MEEIA 2013 performance incentive, and remanded the matter to the MoPSC. In January 2019, the MoPSC issued an order approving an additional $9 million MEEIA 2013 performance incentive. Accordingly, Ameren Missouri recognized the additional performance incentive in the first quarter of 2019. In November 2016, the MoPSC approved a $28 million MEEIA
2013 performance incentive based on a stipulation and agreement among Ameren Missouri, the MoPSC staff, and the MoOPC. Ameren Missouri collected $28 million of the performance incentive over a two-year period that began in February 2017.
The MEEIA 2016 plan provides Ameren Missouri with a performance incentive to earn additional revenues by achieving certain customer energy-efficiency goals, including $27 million if 100% of the goals are achieved during the three-year period beginning March 2016, with the potential to earn more if Ameren Missouri’s energy savings exceed those goals. In September 2017, Ameren Missouri received an order from the MoPSC approving Ameren Missouri’s energy savings results for the first year of the MEEIA 2016 plan. In October 2018, Ameren Missouri received an order
from the MoPSC approving Ameren Missouri’s energy savings results for the second year of the MEEIA 2016 plan. As a result of these orders and in accordance with revenue recognition guidance, Ameren Missouri recognized $5 million of revenues in the first quarter of 2018, $6 million of additional revenues in the fourth quarter of 2018, and $11 million of additional revenues in the first quarter of 2019 relating to the MEEIA 2016 performance incentive.
In December 2018, the MoPSC issued an order approving Ameren Missouri’s MEEIA 2019 plan. The plan includes a portfolio of customer energy-efficiency programs through December 2021 and low-income customer energy-efficiency programs through December 2024, along with a regulatory recovery mechanism. Ameren Missouri intends to invest $226
million over the life of the plan, including $65 million per year through 2021. The plan includes the continued use of the MEEIA rider, which allows Ameren Missouri to collect from, or refund to, customers any difference in actual MEEIA program costs and related lost electric margins and the amounts collected from customers. In addition, the plan includes a performance incentive that provides Ameren Missouri an opportunity to earn additional revenues by achieving certain customer energy-efficiency goals, including $30 million if 100% of the goals are achieved during the period ended December 2021. Additional revenues may be earned if Ameren Missouri exceeds 100%
of its energy savings goals.
2018 Natural Gas Delivery Service Regulatory Rate Review
In December 2018, Ameren Missouri filed a request with the MoPSC to increase its annual revenues for natural gas delivery service by approximately $4 million. The natural gas delivery service rate increase request was based on a 10.30% return on equity, a capital structure composed of 51.84% common equity, a rate base of $259 million, and a test year ended June 30, 2018, with certain pro-forma adjustments through the anticipated true-up date of May 31, 2019. In December 2018, the MoPSC issued an
order approving a stipulation and agreement for an interim rate reduction of $2 million to reflect cost of service updates including the reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate and the amortization of excess deferred taxes as a result of the TCJA. The interim rate reduction became effective January 2, 2019, and will continue until new rates are approved by the MoPSC in this regulatory rate review.
Mark Twain Project Return on Equity Incentive Adder
In November 2018, the FERC issued an order approving a 50 basis point return on equity incentive adder for the Mark Twain project, effective as of February 14, 2018, based on the unique nature of risks involved in the project. This incentive adder is in addition to the current 50 basis
point incentive adder for participation in an RTO and the total return on equity, inclusive of all incentive adders, is subject to the top of the zone of reasonableness. The impact to Ameren’s 2018 earnings was immaterial.
Under a formula ratemaking framework effective through 2022, Ameren Illinois’ electric distribution service rates are subject to an annual revenue requirement reconciliation to its actual recoverable costs and allowed return on equity. The formula ratemaking framework qualifies as an alternative revenue
program under GAAP. Each year, Ameren Illinois records a regulatory asset or a regulatory liability and a corresponding increase or decrease to operating revenues for any differences between the revenue requirement reflected in customer rates for that year and its estimate of the probable increase or decrease in the revenue requirement expected to ultimately be approved by the ICC. As of December 31, 2018, Ameren Illinois had recorded regulatory assets of $16 million and $54 million, including interest, to reflect its expected 2018 and its approved 2017 revenue requirement reconciliation adjustments, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, Ameren Illinois had recorded a $24
million regulatory asset to reflect its approved 2016 revenue requirement reconciliation adjustment, which was collected, with interest, from customers during 2018.
In November 2018, the ICC issued an order in Ameren Illinois’ annual update filing that approved a $72 million increase in Ameren Illinois’ electric distribution service rates beginning in January 2019. This order reflected an increase to the annual formula rate based on 2017 actual costs and expected net plant additions for 2018, and an increase to include the 2017 revenue requirement reconciliation adjustment. It also included a decrease for the conclusion of the 2016 revenue requirement reconciliation adjustment, which was fully collected from customers in 2018, consistent with the ICC’s December 2017 annual update filing order.
The
FEJA revised certain portions of the IEIMA, including extending the IEIMA formula ratemaking framework through 2022, and clarifying that a common equity ratio up to and including 50% is prudent. Beginning in 2017, the FEJA permitted Ameren Illinois to recover, within the following two years, its electric distribution revenue requirement for a given year, independent of actual sales volumes.
The FEJA allows Ameren Illinois to earn a return on its electric energy-efficiency program investments. Ameren Illinois’ electric energy-efficiency investments are deferred as a regulatory asset and earn a return at its weighted-average cost of capital, with the equity return based on the annual average of the monthly yields of the 30-year United States Treasury bonds plus 580 basis points. The equity portion of Ameren Illinois’ return on electric
energy-efficiency investments can be increased or decreased by up to 200 basis points, depending on the achievement of annual energy savings goals. In 2018, there were no performance-related basis point adjustments. In September 2017, the ICC issued an order approving Ameren Illinois’ implementation of the FEJA electric energy-efficiency savings targets and investments for 2018 through 2021. Ameren Illinois plans to invest approximately $100 million per year in electric energy-efficiency programs through 2023, consistent with targets established by the FEJA. The ICC has the ability to reduce electric energy-efficiency savings goals if there are insufficient cost-effective programs available or if the savings goals would require investment levels that exceed amounts allowed by legislation. The electric energy-efficiency program investments and the return
on those investments are collected from customers through a rider and are not included in the electric distribution formula ratemaking framework.
In June 2018, Ameren Illinois filed its annual electric customer energy-efficiency formula rate update to establish the revenue requirement to be used for 2019 rates with the ICC. In November 2018, the ICC issued an order that approved 2019 rates of $35 million for electric customer energy-efficiency investments, which represents an increase of $20 million from 2018 rates.
2018 Natural Gas Delivery Service Regulatory Rate Review
In January 2018, Ameren Illinois filed a request with the ICC seeking approval to increase its annual rates for natural gas delivery service. In November
2018, the ICC issued an order approving a stipulation and agreement that resulted in an annual natural gas rate increase of $32 million, based on a 9.87% return on common equity, a capital structure composed of 50% common equity, and a rate base of $1.6 billion. This increase reflects the reduction in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate enacted under the TCJA, as well as the increase in the Illinois corporate income tax rate that became effective in July 2017, which collectively decreased annual rates by approximately $17 million. The new customer rates were effective in November 2018. As a result of this order, the rate base under the QIP rider was reset to zero. Ameren Illinois used a 2019 future test year in this proceeding.
Income Tax Regulatory Mechanisms
In February 2018, the ICC granted Ameren Illinois’ request, filed in January 2018, to establish a rider to reduce
Ameren Illinois’ electric distribution customer rates for the effect of the reduction in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate enacted under the TCJA and the return of excess deferred taxes, net of the increase in state income taxes enacted in July 2017. Ameren Illinois' electric distribution customer rates were reduced as a result of the rider beginning in the first quarter of 2018. The estimated reduction of approximately $50 million per year will continue through 2019, as base rates will be adjusted to reflect the current income tax rates starting in 2020.
In April 2018, the ICC approved a rider for the difference between revenues billed under natural gas rates established pursuant to Ameren Illinois’ most recent natural gas rate order and the revenues that would have been billed had the state and federal tax rate changes
discussed above been in effect. The rider required Ameren Illinois to record this difference as a regulatory liability beginning January 25, 2018. Ameren Illinois’ natural gas customer rates were reduced as a result of the rider beginning in May 2018. As base rates were updated with the November 2018 natural gas rate order discussed above, a reduction of approximately $15 million will be reflected in customer rates substantially over a one-year period.
ATXI’s Illinois Rivers Project
In August 2017, the Illinois Circuit Court for Edgar County dismissed several of ATXI’s condemnation cases related to one line segment in the Illinois Rivers project. These cases had been filed to obtain easements and rights of
way necessary to complete the line segment. The court found that required notice was not given to the relevant landowners during the underlying ICC proceeding. Upon appeal, in October 2018, the Illinois Supreme Court reversed the Illinois Circuit Court for Edgar County’s decision and remanded the case for further proceedings. In December 2018, the Illinois Supreme Court issued an order to stay its October 2018 ruling. In February 2019, the landowners filed an appeal with the United States Supreme Court. The October 2018 ruling is further stayed pending resolution of the appeal. Construction of the Illinois Rivers project is substantially complete. Delays associated with the condemnation proceedings or a rehearing arising from the Illinois Supreme Court’s ruling will delay the expected completion date to 2020, which is not expected to materially affect 2019 earnings. The estimated line segment capital expenditure investment is approximately $81
million, of which $38 million was invested as of December 31, 2018. The other eight line segments of the Illinois Rivers project are not affected by these proceedings.
Federal
FERC Complaint Cases
In November 2013, a customer group filed a complaint case with the FERC seeking a reduction in the allowed base return on common equity for FERC-regulated transmission rate base under the MISO tariff from 12.38% to 9.15%. In September 2016, the FERC issued a final order in the November 2013 complaint case, which lowered the allowed base return on common equity to 10.32%,
or a 10.82% total allowed return on common equity with the inclusion of a 50 basis point incentive adder for participation in an RTO, effective since September 2016. In 2017, Ameren and Ameren Illinois refunded $21 million and $17 million, respectively related to the November 2013 complaint case. The 10.82% allowed return on common equity may be replaced prospectively after the FERC issues a final order in the February 2015 complaint case, discussed below.
Since the maximum FERC-allowed refund period for the November 2013 complaint case ended in February 2015, another customer complaint case was filed in February 2015. MISO transmission owners subsequently filed a motion to dismiss the February 2015 complaint, as discussed below. The February 2015 complaint case seeks
a further reduction in the allowed base return on common equity for FERC-regulated transmission rate base under the MISO tariff. In June 2016, an administrative law judge issued an initial decision in the February 2015 complaint case. If approved by the FERC, it would lower the allowed base return on common equity for the 15-month period of February 2015 to May 2016 to 9.70%, or a 10.20% total allowed return on equity with the inclusion of a 50 basis point incentive adder for participation in an RTO. It would also require customer refunds, with interest, for that 15-month period. A final FERC order would also establish the allowed return on common equity that will apply prospectively from the effective date of such order, replacing the current 10.82% total return on common equity. In the second quarter of 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated and remanded
to the FERC an order in an unrelated case in which the FERC established the allowed base return on common equity methodology subsequently used in the two MISO complaint cases described above. In October 2018, the FERC issued an order addressing the remanded issues in an unrelated case. That order proposed a new methodology for determining the base return on equity and required further briefs from the participants. In November 2018, the FERC issued an order related to the February 2015 complaint case and the September 2016 final order, which required briefs from the participants to be filed in February 2019 regarding a new methodology for determining the base return on common equity and whether and how to apply the new methodology to the two MISO complaint cases. Ameren is unable to predict the ultimate impact of the proposed methodology on these complaint cases at this time. As the FERC is under no
deadline to issue a final order, the timing of the issuance of the final order in the February 2015 complaint case, or any potential impact to the amounts refunded as a result of the September 2016 final order, is uncertain.
In September 2017, MISO transmission owners, including Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois, and ATXI, filed a motion to dismiss the February 2015 complaint case with the FERC. The MISO transmission owners maintain that the February 2015 complaint was predicated on the now superseded 12.38% allowed base return on common equity and is therefore inapplicable given the current 10.32% allowed base return on common equity. The MISO transmission owners further maintain that the current 10.32% allowed base return on common equity has not been proven to be
unjust and unreasonable based on information provided, including the base return on common equity methodology ranges set forth in the February 2015 complaint case and in the initial decision issued by an administrative law judge in June 2016. Additionally, the MISO transmission owners maintain that the February 2015 complaint should be dismissed because the approach utilized in the case to assert that a return on common equity was unjust and unreasonable was insufficient. That same approach was rejected by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in an unrelated case, as discussed above. The FERC is under no deadline to issue an order on this motion.
As
of December 31, 2018, Ameren and Ameren Illinois had recorded current regulatory liabilities of $44 million and $26 million, respectively, to reflect the expected refunds, including interest, associated with the reduced allowed returns on common equity in the initial decision in the February 2015 complaint case. Ameren Missouri does not expect that a reduction in the FERC-allowed base return on common equity would be material to its results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.
FERC Federal Income Tax Proceeding and Formula Rate Change
In March 2018, the FERC granted a request filed in February 2018 by MISO transmission owners with forward-looking rate formulas, including Ameren Illinois
and ATXI, to allow revisions to their 2018 electric transmission rates to reflect the effect of the reduction in federal income taxes enacted under the TCJA. Ameren Illinois and ATXI’s 2018 electric transmission rates were reduced by $27 million and $23 million, respectively.
In May 2018, the FERC accepted Ameren Illinois, and ATXI’s tariff filings to change the formula rate calculation. The change allows for the recovery or refund of both excess deferred taxes resulting from tax law or rate changes and the effect of permanent income tax differences and were reflected in Ameren Illinois’ and ATXI’s electric transmission rates starting in January 2019.
Pension
and postretirement benefit costs tracker(w)
43
—
43
35
—
35
Renewable
energy credits and zero emission credits(x)
—
102
102
—
58
58
Excess
income taxes collected in 2018(y)
60
—
60
—
—
—
Other
13
12
25
16
14
30
Total
regulatory liabilities
$
2,867
$
1,803
$
4,786
$
2,683
$
1,721
$
4,515
Less:
current regulatory liabilities
(68
)
(62
)
(149
)
(19
)
(92
)
$
(128
)
Noncurrent
regulatory liabilities
$
2,799
$
1,741
$
4,637
$
2,664
$
1,629
$
4,387
(a)
Under-recovered
or over-recovered fuel costs to be recovered or refunded through the FAC. Specific accumulation periods aggregate the under-recovered or over-recovered costs over four months, any related adjustments that occur over the following four months, and the recovery from, or refund to, customers that occurs over the next eight months.
(b)
Under-recovered or over-recovered costs from utility customers. Amounts will be recovered from, or refunded to, customers within one year of the deferral.
(c)
Deferral of commodity-related
derivative MTM losses or gains. See Note 7 – Derivative Financial Instruments for additional information.
(d)
The difference between Ameren Illinois’ electric distribution service annual revenue requirement calculated under the performance-based formula ratemaking framework and the revenue requirement included in customer rates for that year. Any under-recovery or over-recovery will be recovered from, or refunded to, customers with interest within two years.
Ameren Illinois’ and ATXI’s annual revenue requirement reconciliation calculated pursuant to the FERC’s electric transmission formula ratemaking framework. Any under-recovery or over-recovery will be recovered from, or refunded to, customers within two years.
(g)
Under-recovered or over-recovered natural gas revenue caused by sales volume deviations from weather normalized sales approved by the ICC in rate regulatory reviews. Each year’s amount will be recovered from, or refunded to, customers
from April through December of the following year.
(h)
These costs are being amortized in proportion to the recognition of prior service costs (credits) and actuarial losses (gains) attributable to Ameren’s pension plan and postretirement benefit plans. See Note 10 – Retirement Benefits for additional information.
(i)
The regulatory assets represent deferred income taxes that will be recovered from customers related to the equity component of allowance for funds used during construction and the effects of tax rate
changes from the TCJA and the increased income tax rate in Illinois. The regulatory liabilities represent deferred income taxes that will be refunded to customers related to depreciation differences, other tax liabilities, and the unamortized portion of investment tax credits recorded at rates in excess of current statutory rates. Amounts associated with the equity component of allowance for funds used during construction, and the unamortized portion of investment tax credits will be amortized over the expected life of the related assets. The amortization periods for depreciation differences are determined in rate orders by the applicable regulators and range from 7 to 60 years. See Note 12 – Income Taxes for amounts related to the revaluation of deferred income taxes under the TCJA.
(j)
Ameren
Missouri’s Callaway energy center operations and maintenance expenses, property taxes, and carrying costs incurred between the plant in-service date and the date the plant was reflected in rates. These costs are being amortized over the original remaining life of the energy center.
(k)
Losses related to reacquired debt. These amounts are being amortized over the lives of the related new debt issuances or the original lives of the old debt issuances if no new debt was issued.
(l)
The recoverable portion of accrued
environmental site liabilities that will be collected from electric and natural gas customers through ICC-approved cost recovery riders. The period of recovery will depend on the timing of remediation expenditures. See Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies for additional information.
(m)
Storm costs from 2015, 2016, and 2018 deferred in accordance with the IEIMA. These costs are being amortized over five-year periods beginning in the year the storm occurred.
(n)
Demand-side costs incurred prior to implementation
of the MEEIA in 2013, including the costs of developing, implementing, and evaluating customer energy-efficiency and demand response programs. The MoPSC’s March 2017 electric rate order modified certain amortization periods for these costs. Costs incurred from May 2008 through September 2008, and from January 2010 through July 2012, are being amortized over a two-year period that began in April 2017. Costs incurred from October 2008 through December 2009 are no longer being amortized as of April 2017, and a new amortization period for these costs will be determined in a future regulatory rate review. Costs incurred from August 2012 through December 2012 are being amortized over a six-year period that began in June 2015.
(o)
The period of recovery
will depend on the timing of actual expenditures.
(p)
The MoPSC’s May 2010 electric rate order allowed Ameren Missouri to record an allowance for funds used during construction for pollution control equipment at its Sioux energy center until the cost of that equipment was included in customer rates beginning in 2011. These costs are being amortized over the expected life of the Sioux energy center, currently through 2033.
(q)
Costs associated with Ameren Missouri’s solar rebate program to fulfill its renewable energy
requirements. Costs incurred from 2010 to 2014 are being amortized over a two-year period that began in April 2017 as modified per the MoPSC’s March 2017 electric rate order. Costs incurred from 2015 to 2016 are being amortized over a three-year period that began in April 2017.
(r)
Electric energy-efficiency program investment deferrals which earn a return at Ameren Illinois’ weighted-average cost of capital with the equity return based on the annual average of the monthly yields of the 30-year United States Treasury bonds plus 580 basis points. The investments are being amortized over their weighted-average useful lives beginning in the period in which they were made, with current remaining amortization periods ranging from 8
to 12 years.
(s)
The Ameren Missouri balance relates to the MEEIA. The MEEIA rider allows Ameren Missouri to collect from, or refund to, customers any annual difference in the actual amounts incurred and the amounts collected from customers for the MEEIA program costs, lost electric margins, and the performance incentive. Under the MEEIA rider, collections from or refunds to customers occur one year after the program costs, and lost electric margins are incurred or any performance incentive are earned. The Ameren Illinois balance relates to a regulatory tracking mechanism to recover its electric pre-FEJA costs and natural gas costs associated with developing, implementing, and evaluating customer
energy efficiency and demand response programs. Any under-recovery or over-recovery will be collected from, or refunded to, customers over the year following the plan year.
(t)
Estimated refunds to transmission customers related to the February 2015 FERC complaint case discussed above.
(u)
Estimated funds collected for the eventual dismantling and removal of plant retired from service, net of salvage value.
(v)
Recoverable
or refundable removal costs for AROs, including net realized and unrealized gains and losses related to the nuclear decommissioning trust fund investments. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Asset Retirement Obligations.
(w)
A regulatory tracking mechanism for the difference between the level of pension and postretirement benefit costs incurred by Ameren Missouri and the level of such costs included in customer rates. For costs incurred prior to August 2012, the amounts are being amortized over a two-year period that began in April 2017 as modified per the MoPSC’s March 2017 electric rate order. For costs incurred between August 2012 and December 2014, the MoPSC’s May 2015 electric rate order directed the amortization
period to occur over a five-year period that began in June 2015. For costs incurred between January 2015 and December 2016, the MoPSC’s March 2017 electric rate order directed the amortization period to occur over a five-year period that began in April 2017. For costs incurred after December 2016, the amortization period will be determined in a future electric regulatory rate review.
(x)
Funds collected for the purchase of renewable energy credits and zero emission credits through IPA procurements. The balance will be amortized as the credits are purchased.
(y)
The
excess amount collected in rates related to the TCJA from January 1, 2018, through July 31, 2018. The regulatory liability will be reflected in customer rates over a period of time to be determined by the MoPSC in the next regulatory rate review.
The following table presents property, plant, and equipment, net, for each of the Ameren
Companies at December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Ameren
Missouri(a)
Ameren
Illinois
Other
Ameren(a)
2018
Property,
plant, and equipment at original cost:(b)
Electric generation
$
11,432
$
—
$
—
$
11,432
Electric
distribution
5,989
5,970
—
11,959
Electric transmission
1,277
2,647
1,385
5,309
Natural
gas
500
2,701
—
3,201
Other(c)
1,008
863
230
2,101
20,206
12,181
1,615
34,002
Less:
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
8,726
3,294
253
12,273
11,480
8,887
1,362
21,729
Construction
work in progress:
Nuclear fuel in process
217
—
—
217
Other
406
311
147
864
Property,
plant, and equipment, net
$
12,103
$
9,198
$
1,509
$
22,810
2017
Property,
plant, and equipment at original cost:(b)
Electric generation
$
11,132
$
—
$
—
$
11,132
Electric
distribution
5,766
5,649
—
11,415
Electric transmission
1,201
2,298
1,167
4,666
Natural
gas
474
2,419
—
2,893
Other(c)
922
757
242
1,921
19,495
11,123
1,409
32,027
Less:
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
8,305
3,082
246
11,633
11,190
8,041
1,163
20,394
Construction
work in progress:
Nuclear fuel in process
148
—
—
148
Other
413
252
259
924
Property,
plant, and equipment, net
$
11,751
$
8,293
$
1,422
$
21,466
(a)
Amounts
in Ameren and Ameren Missouri include two CTs under separate agreements. The gross cumulative asset value of those agreements was $235 million and $233 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The total accumulated depreciation associated with the two CTs was $89 million and $83 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively. See Note 5 – Long-term Debt and Equity Financings for additional information on these agreements.
(b)
The estimated lives for each asset group are as follows: 5 to 72 years for electric generation, excluding Ameren Missouri’s hydro generating assets which have useful lives of up to 150 years, 20 to 80 years for electric distribution, 50 to 75 years for electric transmission, 20
to 80 years for natural gas, and 5 to 55 years for other.
(c)
Other property, plant, and equipment includes assets used to support electric and natural gas services.
Capitalized software costs are classified within “Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net” on the balance sheet and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected period of benefit, ranging from 5 to 10 years. The following table presents the amortization expense of capitalized
software, the gross carrying value of capitalized software, and the related accumulated amortization by year:
Amortization Expense(a)
Gross
Carrying Value
Accumulated Amortization
2018
2017
2016
2018
2017
2018
2017
Ameren
$
71
$
58
$
52
$
734
$
655
$
(514
)
$
(466
)
Ameren
Missouri
24
20
17
223
191
(125
)
(107
)
Ameren
Illinois
44
36
33
297
241
(183
)
(146
)
(a)
As
of December 31, 2018, the estimated amortization expense of capitalized software for each of the five succeeding years is not expected to differ materially from the current year expense.
The following table provides accrued capital and nuclear fuel expenditures at December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, which represent noncash investing activity excluded from
the accompanying statements of cash flows:
Ameren
Ameren
Missouri
Ameren
Illinois
Accrued
capital expenditures:
2018
$
272
$
121
$
138
2017
361
159
175
2016
251
116
87
Accrued
nuclear fuel expenditures:
2018
$
20
$
20
$
—
2017
10
10
—
2016
20
20
—
NOTE
4 – SHORT-TERM DEBT AND LIQUIDITY
The liquidity needs of the Ameren Companies are typically supported through the use of available cash, drawings under committed credit agreements, commercial paper issuances, or, in the case of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois, short-term affiliate borrowings.
Credit Agreements
In December 2018, the Credit Agreements, which were scheduled to mature in December 2021, were extended and now mature in December 2022. The Credit Agreements provide $2.1 billion of credit cumulatively through maturity. The maturity date may be extended for an additional one-year period upon mutual consent of the borrowers and lenders. Credit available under the agreements is provided by a group of 22 international,
national, and regional lenders, with no single lender providing more than $118 million of credit in aggregate.
The obligations of each borrower under the respective Credit Agreements to which it is a party are several and not joint. Except under limited circumstances relating to expenses and indemnities, the obligations of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois under the respective Credit Agreements are not guaranteed by Ameren (parent) or any other subsidiary of Ameren. The following table presents the maximum aggregate amount available to each borrower under each facility:
Missouri
Credit
Agreement
Illinois
Credit Agreement
Ameren (parent)
$
700
$
500
Ameren Missouri
800
(a)
Ameren
Illinois
(a)
800
(a)
Not applicable.
The borrowers have the option to seek additional commitments from existing or new lenders to increase the total facility size of the Credit Agreements to a maximum of $1.2 billion for the Missouri Credit Agreement and $1.3
billion for the Illinois Credit Agreement. Ameren (parent) borrowings are due and payable no later than the maturity date of the Credit Agreements. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois borrowings under the applicable Credit Agreement are due and payable no later than the earlier of the maturity date or 364 days after the originating date of the borrowing.
The obligations of the borrowers under the Credit Agreements are unsecured. Loans are available on a revolving basis under each of the Credit Agreements. Funds borrowed may be repaid and, subject to satisfaction of the conditions to borrowing, reborrowed from time to time. At the election of each borrower, the interest rates on such loans will be the alternate base rate plus the margin applicable to the particular borrower and/or the eurodollar rate plus the margin applicable to the particular borrower. The applicable margins will be determined by the
borrower’s long-term unsecured credit ratings or, if no such ratings are in effect, the borrower’s corporate/issuer ratings then in effect. The borrowers have received commitments from the lenders to issue letters of credit up to $100 million under each of the Credit Agreements. In addition, the issuance of letters of credit is subject to the $2.1 billion overall combined facility borrowing limitations of the Credit Agreements.
The borrowers will use the proceeds from any borrowings under the Credit Agreements for general corporate purposes, including working capital, commercial paper liquidity support, issuance of letters of credit, loan funding under the Ameren money pool arrangements, and other short-term affiliate loan arrangements. The Missouri Credit Agreement and the Illinois Credit Agreement are available to support issuances
under Ameren (parent)’s, Ameren Missouri’s and Ameren Illinois’ commercial paper programs, respectively, subject to borrowing sublimits. As of December 31, 2018, based on commercial paper outstanding and letters of credit issued under the Credit Agreements, along with cash and cash equivalents, the net liquidity available to Ameren (parent), Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois, collectively, was $1.5 billion.
Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois did not borrow under the Credit Agreements for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Commercial Paper
The following table summarizes the borrowing activity and relevant interest rates under Ameren (parent)’s, Ameren Missouri’s, and Ameren Illinois’ commercial paper programs for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Ameren
(parent)
Ameren Missouri
Ameren Illinois
Ameren Consolidated
2018
Average daily commercial paper outstanding
$
410
$
61
$
108
$
579
Outstanding
borrowings at period-end
470
55
72
597
Weighted-average interest rate
2.31
%
1.94
%
2.26
%
2.26
%
Peak
outstanding commercial paper during period(a)
$
543
$
481
$
442
$
1,295
Peak
interest rate
3.10
%
2.80
%
2.85
%
3.10
%
2017
Average
daily commercial paper outstanding
$
573
$
5
$
90
$
668
Outstanding
borrowings at period-end
383
39
62
484
Weighted-average interest rate
1.30
%
1.24
%
1.35
%
1.31
%
Peak
outstanding commercial paper during period(a)
$
841
$
64
$
469
$
948
Peak
interest rate
1.90
%
1.78
%
2.00
%
2.00
%
(a)
The
timing of peak outstanding commercial paper issuances varies by company. Therefore, the sum of the peak amounts presented by the companies may not equal the Ameren consolidated peak amount for the period.
Indebtedness Provisions and Other Covenants
The information below is a summary of the Ameren Companies’ compliance with indebtedness provisions and other covenants.
The Credit Agreements contain conditions for borrowings and issuances of letters of credit. These conditions include the absence of default or unmatured default, material accuracy of representations and warranties (excluding any representation after the closing date as to the absence of material adverse change and material litigation, and the absence of any notice of violation, liability, or requirement under any environmental laws that could have a material
adverse effect), and obtaining required regulatory authorizations. In addition, it is a condition for any Ameren Illinois borrowing that, at the time of and after giving effect to such borrowing, Ameren Illinois not be in violation of any limitation on its ability to incur unsecured indebtedness contained in its articles of incorporation.
The Credit Agreements also contain nonfinancial covenants, including restrictions on the ability to incur certain liens, to transact with affiliates, to dispose of assets, to make investments in or transfer assets to its affiliates, and to merge with other entities. The Credit Agreements require each of Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois to maintain consolidated indebtedness of not more than 65% of its consolidated total capitalization pursuant to a defined calculation set forth in the agreements. As of December 31,
2018, the ratios of consolidated indebtedness to total consolidated capitalization, calculated in accordance with the provisions of the Credit Agreements, were 53%, 47%, and 48%, for Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois, respectively.
The Credit Agreements contain default provisions that apply separately to each borrower. However, a default of Ameren Missouri or Ameren Illinois under the applicable credit agreement is also deemed to constitute a default of Ameren (parent) under such agreement. Defaults include a cross-default resulting from a default of such borrower under any other agreement covering outstanding indebtedness of such borrower and certain subsidiaries (other than project finance subsidiaries and nonmaterial subsidiaries)
in excess of $100 million in the aggregate (including under the other credit agreement). However, under the default provisions of the Credit Agreements, any default of Ameren (parent) under either credit agreement that results solely from a default of Ameren Missouri or Ameren Illinois does not result in a cross-default of Ameren (parent) under the other credit agreement. Further, the Credit Agreements default provisions provide that an Ameren (parent) default under either of the Credit Agreements does not constitute a default by Ameren Missouri or Ameren Illinois.
None of the Credit Agreements or financing agreements contain credit rating triggers that would cause a default or acceleration of repayment of outstanding balances. The Ameren Companies were in compliance with the provisions and covenants of the Credit Agreements at December 31,
2018.
Ameren has money pool agreements with and among its subsidiaries to coordinate and provide for certain short-term cash and working capital requirements.
Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois, and ATXI may participate in the utility money pool as both lenders and borrowers. Ameren (parent) and Ameren Services may participate in the utility money pool only as lenders. Surplus internal funds are contributed to the money pool from participants. The primary sources of external funds for the utility money pool are the Credit Agreements
and the commercial paper programs. The total amount available to the pool participants from the utility money pool at any given time is reduced by the amount of borrowings made by participants, but it is increased to the extent that the pool participants advance surplus funds to the utility money pool or remit funds from other external sources. The availability of funds is also determined by funding requirement limits established by regulatory authorizations. Participants receiving a loan under the utility money pool agreement must repay the principal amount of such loan, together with accrued interest. The rate of interest depends on the composition of internal and external funds in the utility money pool. The average interest rate for borrowing under the utility money pool for the year ended December 31, 2018, was 2.10% (2017 –
1.19%).
See Note 13 – Related-party Transactions for the amount of interest income and expense from the utility money pool agreement recorded by the Ameren Companies for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.
NOTE 5 – LONG-TERM DEBT AND EQUITY FINANCINGS
The following table presents long-term debt outstanding, including maturities due within one year, for the Ameren Companies as of December 31, 2018
and 2017:
2018
2017
Ameren (Parent):
2.70%
Senior unsecured notes due 2020
$
350
$
350
3.65% Senior unsecured notes due 2026
350
350
Total
long-term debt, gross
700
700
Less: Unamortized debt issuance costs
(3
)
(4
)
Long-term debt, net
$
697
$
696
Ameren
Missouri:
Bonds and notes:
6.00% Senior secured notes due 2018(a)
—
179
5.10%
Senior secured notes due 2018(a)
—
199
6.70% Senior secured notes due 2019(a)(b)
329
329
5.10%
Senior secured notes due 2019(a)
244
244
5.00% Senior secured notes due 2020(a)
85
85
1992
Series bonds due 2022(c)(d)
47
47
3.50% Senior secured notes due 2024(a)
350
350
2.95%
Senior secured notes due 2027(a)
400
400
5.45% First mortgage bonds due 2028(e)
(e)
(e)
1998
Series A bonds due 2033(c)(d)
60
60
1998 Series B bonds due 2033(c)(d)
50
50
1998
Series C bonds due 2033(c)(d)
50
50
5.50% Senior secured notes due 2034(a)
184
184
5.30%
Senior secured notes due 2037(a)
300
300
8.45% Senior secured notes due 2039(a)(b)
350
350
3.90%
Senior secured notes due 2042(a)(b)
485
485
3.65% Senior secured notes due 2045(a)
400
400
4.00%
First mortgage bonds due 2048(f)
425
—
Finance obligations:
City of Bowling Green agreement (Peno Creek CT) due 2022(g)
30
36
Audrain
County agreement (Audrain County CT) due 2023(g)
1993
Series B-1 Senior unsecured notes due 2028(d)
17
17
3.80% First mortgage bonds due 2028(l)
430
—
6.70%
Senior secured notes due 2036(h)
61
61
6.70% Senior secured notes due 2036(m)
42
42
4.80%
Senior secured notes due 2043(h)
280
280
4.30% Senior secured notes due 2044(h)
250
250
4.15%
Senior secured notes due 2046(h)
490
490
3.70% First mortgage bonds due 2047(l)
500
500
4.50%
First mortgage bonds due 2049(l)
500
—
Total long-term debt, gross
3,330
2,857
Less: Unamortized
discount and premium
(3
)
(3
)
Less: Unamortized debt issuance costs
(31
)
(24
)
Less: Maturities due within one year
—
(457
)
Long-term
debt, net
$
3,296
$
2,373
ATXI:
3.43% Senior notes due 2050(n)
$
450
$
450
Total
long-term debt, gross
450
450
Less: Unamortized debt issuance costs
(2
)
(2
)
Long-term debt, net
$
448
$
448
Ameren
consolidated long-term debt, net
$
7,859
$
7,094
(a)
These notes are collaterally secured by first mortgage bonds issued by Ameren Missouri under the Ameren Missouri mortgage indenture. The notes have a fall-away lien provision and will remain secured only as long as any first
mortgage bonds issued under the Ameren Missouri mortgage indenture remain outstanding. Redemption, purchase, or maturity of all first mortgage bonds, including first mortgage bonds currently outstanding and any that may be issued in the future, would result in a release of the first mortgage bonds currently securing these notes, at which time these notes would become unsecured obligations. Considering the 2048 maturity of the 4.00% first mortgage bonds and the restrictions preventing a release date to occur that are attached to certain senior secured notes described in footnote (b) below, Ameren Missouri does not expect the first mortgage lien protection associated with these notes to fall away.
(b)
Ameren
Missouri has agreed that so long as any of the 3.90% senior secured notes due 2042 are outstanding, Ameren Missouri will not permit a release date to occur, and so long as any of the 6.70% senior secured notes due 2019 and 8.45% senior secured notes due 2039 are outstanding, Ameren Missouri will not optionally redeem, purchase, or otherwise retire in full the outstanding first mortgage bonds not subject to release provisions.
(c)
These bonds are collaterally secured by first mortgage bonds issued by Ameren Missouri under the Ameren Missouri mortgage indenture and have a fall-away lien provision similar
to that of Ameren Missouri’s senior secured notes. The bonds are also backed by an insurance guarantee policy.
(d)
The interest rates and the periods during which such rates apply vary depending on our selection of defined rate modes. Maximum interest rates could reach 18%, depending on the series of bonds. The average interest rates for 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
2018
2017
Ameren
Missouri 1992 Series due 2022
2.37%
1.43%
Ameren Missouri 1998 Series A due 2033
2.76%
1.77%
Ameren Missouri 1998 Series B due 2033
2.79%
1.75%
Ameren Missouri 1998 Series C due
2033
2.83%
1.73%
Ameren Illinois 1993 Series B-1 due 2028
1.58%
1.08%
(e)
These bonds are first mortgage bonds issued by Ameren Missouri under the Ameren Missouri mortgage bond indenture. They are secured by substantially all Ameren Missouri property and franchises. Less than
$1 million principal amount of the bonds remain outstanding.
(f)
These bonds are first mortgage bonds issued by Ameren Missouri under the Ameren Missouri bond indenture. They are secured by substantially all Ameren Missouri property and franchises.
(g)
Payments due related to these financing obligations are paid to a trustee, which is authorized to utilize the cash only to pay equal amounts due to Ameren Missouri under related bonds issued by the city/county and held
by Ameren Missouri. The timing and amounts of payments due from Ameren Missouri under the agreements are equal to the timing and amount of bond service payments due to Ameren Missouri, resulting in no net cash flow. The balance of both the financing obligations and the related investments in debt securities, recorded in "Other Assets," was $270 million and $276 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.
(h)
These notes are collaterally secured by first mortgage bonds issued by Ameren Illinois under its 1992 mortgage indenture.
They are secured by substantially all property of the former IP and CIPS. The notes have a fall-away lien provision and will remain secured only as long as any series of first mortgage bonds issued under its 1992 mortgage indenture remain outstanding. Redemption, purchase, or maturity of all first mortgage bonds, including first mortgage bonds currently outstanding and any that may be issued in the future, would result in a release of the first mortgage bonds currently securing these notes, at which time these notes would become unsecured obligations. Considering the 2049 maturity date of the 4.50% first mortgage bonds, Ameren Illinois does not expect the first mortgage lien protection associated with these
Ameren Illinois has agreed that so long as any of the 2.70% senior secured notes due 2022 are outstanding, Ameren Illinois will not permit a release date to occur.
(j)
These bonds are first mortgage bonds issued by Ameren Illinois under its 1933 mortgage indenture. They are secured by substantially all property of the former CILCO. The bonds are callable at 100%
of par value. Less than $1 million principal amount of the bonds remain outstanding.
(k)
These bonds are first mortgage bonds issued by Ameren Illinois under its 1992 mortgage indenture. They are secured by substantially all property of the former IP and CIPS. The bonds are also backed by an insurance guarantee policy. Less than $1 million principal amount of the bonds remains outstanding.
(l)
These bonds are first mortgage
bonds issued by Ameren Illinois under its 1992 mortgage indenture. They are secured by substantially all property of the former IP and CIPS.
(m)
These notes are collaterally secured by first mortgage bonds issued by Ameren Illinois under its 1933 mortgage indenture. They are secured by substantially all property of the former CILCO. The notes have a fall-away lien provision, and Ameren Illinois could cause these notes to become unsecured at any time by redeeming the 5.90% first mortgage bonds due 2023 (of which less than $1 million principal amount remains outstanding).
(n)
The
following table presents the principal maturities schedule for the 3.43% senior notes due 2050:
Payment Date
Principal Payment
August 2022
$
49.5
August 2024
49.5
August
2027
49.5
August 2030
49.5
August 2032
49.5
August 2038
49.5
August 2043
76.5
August
2050
76.5
Total
$
450.0
The following table presents the aggregate maturities of long-term debt, including current maturities, for the Ameren Companies at December 31, 2018:
Ameren
(parent)(a)
Ameren
Missouri(a)
Ameren
Illinois(a)
ATXI(a)
Ameren
Consolidated
2019
$
—
$
580
$
—
$
—
$
580
2020
350
92
—
—
442
2021
—
8
—
—
8
2022
—
55
400
50
505
2023
—
240
—
—
240
Thereafter
350
3,054
2,930
400
6,734
Total
$
700
$
4,029
$
3,330
$
450
$
8,509
(a)
Excludes
unamortized discount, unamortized premium, and debt issuance costs of $3 million, $31 million, $34 million and $2 million at Ameren (parent), Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois and ATXI, respectively.
All classes of Ameren Missouri’s and Ameren Illinois’ preferred stock are entitled to cumulative dividends, have voting rights, and are not subject to mandatory redemption. The preferred stock of Ameren’s subsidiaries is included in “Noncontrolling
Interests” on Ameren’s consolidated balance sheet. The following table presents the outstanding preferred stock of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois, which is redeemable, at the option of the issuer, at the prices shown below as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Redemption Price
(per share)
2018
2017
Ameren Missouri:
Without par value and
stated value of $100 per share, 25 million shares authorized
$3.50 Series
130,000 shares
$
110.00
$
13
$
13
$3.70
Series
40,000 shares
104.75
4
4
$4.00 Series
150,000 shares
105.625
15
15
$4.30
Series
40,000 shares
105.00
4
4
$4.50 Series
213,595 shares
110.00
(a)
21
21
$4.56
Series
200,000 shares
102.47
20
20
$4.75 Series
20,000 shares
102.176
2
2
$5.50
Series A
14,000 shares
110.00
1
1
Total
$
80
$
80
Ameren
Illinois:
With par value of $100 per share, 2 million shares authorized
4.00%
Series
144,275 shares
$
101.00
$
14
$
14
4.08% Series
45,224
shares
103.00
5
5
4.20% Series
23,655 shares
104.00
2
2
4.25%
Series
50,000 shares
102.00
5
5
4.26% Series
16,621 shares
103.00
2
2
4.42%
Series
16,190 shares
103.00
2
2
4.70% Series
18,429 shares
103.00
2
2
4.90%
Series
73,825 shares
102.00
7
7
4.92% Series
49,289 shares
103.50
5
5
5.16%
Series
50,000 shares
102.00
5
5
6.625% Series
124,274 shares
100.00
12
12
7.75%
Series
4,542 shares
100.00
1
1
Total
$
62
$
62
Total
Ameren
$
142
$
142
(a)
In the event of voluntary liquidation, $105.50.
Ameren
has 100 million shares of $0.01 par value preferred stock authorized, with no such shares outstanding. Ameren Missouri has 7.5 million shares of $1 par value preference stock authorized, with no such shares outstanding. Ameren Illinois has 2.6 million shares of no par value preferred stock authorized, with no such shares outstanding.
Ameren
In 2018, Ameren issued a total of 1.2 million shares of common stock under its DRPlus and 401(k) plan, and received proceeds of $74 million. In addition, in 2018, Ameren issued
0.7 million shares of common stock valued at $35 million upon the vesting of stock-based compensation. Ameren did not issue any common stock in 2017 or 2016.
In October 2018, Ameren filed a Form S-8 registration statement with the SEC, authorizing the offering of 4 million additional shares of its common stock under its 401(k) plan. Shares of common stock issuable under the 401(k) plan are, at Ameren’s option, newly issued shares, treasury shares, or shares purchased in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions.
In December 2017, Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois filed a Form S-3 shelf registration statement with the SEC, registering the issuance of an indeterminate amount of certain types of securities. The registration
statement became effective immediately upon filing and expires in December 2020.
Ameren filed a Form S-3 registration statement with the SEC in May 2017, authorizing the offering of 6 million additional shares of its common stock under the DRPlus, which expires in 2020. Shares of common stock sold under the DRPlus are, at Ameren’s option, newly issued shares, treasury shares, or shares purchased in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the DRPlus participant funds of $1 million and $8 million, respectively, were reflected on Ameren’s consolidated balance sheets in “Other current assets.”
In April 2018, Ameren Missouri issued $425 million of 4.00% first mortgage bonds due April 2048, with interest payable semiannually on April 1 and October 1 of each year, beginning October 1, 2018. Ameren Missouri received proceeds of $419 million, which were used to repay outstanding short-term debt, including short-term debt that Ameren Missouri incurred in connection with the repayment of $179 million of its 6.00% senior secured notes that matured April 1, 2018.
In
August 2018, $199 million principal amount of Ameren Missouri’s 5.10% senior secured notes matured and were repaid with cash on hand.
In June 2017, Ameren Missouri issued $400 million of 2.95% senior secured notes due June 2027, with interest payable semiannually on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning December 15, 2017. Ameren Missouri received proceeds of $396 million, which were used, in conjunction with other available funds, to repay at maturity $425 million of Ameren Missouri’s 6.40% senior secured notes in June 2017.
For
information on Ameren Missouri’s capital contributions, refer to Capital Contributions in Note 13 – Related-party Transactions.
Ameren Illinois
In May 2018, Ameren Illinois issued $430 million of 3.80% first mortgage bonds due May 2028, with interest payable semiannually on May 15 and November 15 of each year, beginning November 15, 2018. Ameren Illinois received proceeds of $427 million, which were used to repay outstanding short-term debt, including short-term debt that Ameren Illinois incurred in connection with the repayment of $144 million of its 6.25% senior secured notes that matured April 1,
2018.
In November 2018, Ameren Illinois issued $500 million of 4.50% first mortgage bonds due March 2049, with interest payable semiannually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, beginning March 15, 2019. Ameren Illinois received proceeds of $495 million, which were used to repay outstanding short-term debt, including short-term debt that Ameren Illinois incurred in connection with the repayment of $313 million of its 9.75% senior secured notes that matured November 15, 2018.
In November 2017, Ameren Illinois issued $500 million
of 3.70% first mortgage bonds due December 2047, with interest payable semiannually on June 1 and December 1 of each year, beginning June 1, 2018. Ameren Illinois received proceeds of $492 million, which were used to repay outstanding short-term debt, including short-term debt that Ameren Illinois incurred in connection with the repayment of $250 million of its 6.125% senior secured notes that matured in November 2017.
For information on Ameren Illinois’ capital contributions, refer to Capital Contributions in Note 13 – Related-party Transactions.
ATXI
In June 2017, pursuant to a note purchase agreement, ATXI
agreed to issue $450 million principal amount of 3.43% senior unsecured notes, due 2050, with interest payable semiannually on the last day of February and August of each year, beginning February 28, 2018, through a private placement offering exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. ATXI issued $150 million principal amount of the notes in June 2017 and the remaining $300 million principal amount of the notes in August 2017. ATXI received proceeds of $449 million from the notes, which were used by ATXI to repay existing short-term and long-term affiliate debt.
Indenture Provisions and Other Covenants
Ameren
Missouri’s and Ameren Illinois’ indentures and articles of incorporation include covenants and provisions related to issuances of first mortgage bonds and preferred stock. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois are required to meet certain ratios to issue additional first mortgage bonds and preferred stock. A failure to achieve these ratios would not result in a default under these covenants and provisions but would restrict the companies’ ability to issue bonds or preferred stock. The following table summarizes the required and actual interest coverage ratios for interest charges, dividend coverage ratios, and bonds and preferred stock issuable as of December 31, 2018, at an assumed interest rate of 5% and dividend rate of 6%.
Required Interest
Coverage
Ratio(a)
Actual Interest
Coverage Ratio
Bonds Issuable(b)
Required Dividend
Coverage Ratio(c)
Actual Dividend
Coverage Ratio
Preferred Stock
Issuable
Ameren Missouri
>2.0
5.5
$
4,688
>2.5
140.8
$
3,153
Ameren Illinois
>2.0
6.9
4,234
(d)
>1.5
3.2
203
(e)
(a)
Coverage
required on the annual interest charges on first mortgage bonds outstanding and to be issued. Coverage is not required in certain cases when additional first mortgage bonds are issued on the basis of retired bonds.
Amount of bonds issuable based either on required coverage ratios or unfunded property additions, whichever is more restrictive. The amounts shown also include bonds issuable based on retired bond capacity of $2,006 million
and $985 million at Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois, respectively.
(c)
Coverage required on the annual dividend on preferred stock outstanding and to be issued, as required in the respective company’s articles of incorporation.
(d)
Amount of bonds issuable by Ameren Illinois based on unfunded property additions and retired bonds solely under its 1992 mortgage indenture.
(e)
Preferred
stock issuable is restricted by the amount of preferred stock that is currently authorized by Ameren Illinois’ articles of incorporation.
Ameren’s indenture does not require Ameren to comply with any quantitative financial covenants. The indenture does, however, include certain cross-default provisions. Specifically, either (1) the failure by Ameren to pay when due and upon expiration of any applicable grace period any portion of any Ameren indebtedness in excess of $25 million, or (2) the acceleration upon default of the maturity of any Ameren indebtedness in excess of $25 million under any indebtedness agreement, including borrowings under the Credit Agreements or the Ameren commercial paper program, constitutes a default under the indenture, unless such past due or accelerated debt is discharged or the acceleration
is rescinded or annulled within a specified period.
Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois and certain other nonregistrant Ameren subsidiaries are subject to Section 305(a) of the Federal Power Act, which makes it unlawful for any officer or director of a public utility, as defined in the Federal Power Act, to participate in the making or paying of any dividend from any funds “properly included in capital account.” The FERC has consistently interpreted the provision to allow dividends to be paid as long as (1) the source of the dividends is clearly disclosed, (2) the dividends are not excessive, and (3) there is no self-dealing on the part of corporate officials. At a minimum, Ameren believes that dividends can be paid by its subsidiaries that are public utilities from net income and retained earnings. In addition, under Illinois law, Ameren Illinois and ATXI may not pay any dividend on their respective stock unless, among
other things, their respective earnings and earned surplus are sufficient to declare and pay a dividend after provisions are made for reasonable and proper reserves, or unless Ameren Illinois or ATXI has specific authorization from the ICC.
Ameren Illinois’ articles of incorporation require dividend payments on its common stock to be based on ratios of common stock to total capitalization and other provisions related to certain operating expenses and accumulations of earned surplus. Ameren Illinois has made a commitment to the FERC to maintain a minimum 30% ratio of common stock equity to total capitalization. As of December 31, 2018, using the FERC-agreed upon calculation method, Ameren Illinois’ ratio of common stock equity to total capitalization was 51%.
ATXI’s
note purchase agreement includes financial covenants that require ATXI not to permit at any time (1) debt to exceed 70% of total capitalization or (2) secured debt to exceed 10% of total assets.
At December 31, 2018, the Ameren Companies were in compliance with the provisions and covenants contained in their indentures and articles of incorporation, as applicable, and ATXI was in compliance with the provisions and covenants contained in its note purchase agreement. In order for the Ameren Companies to issue securities in the future, they will have to comply with all applicable requirements in effect at the time of any such issuances.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements
At
December 31, 2018, none of the Ameren Companies had any significant off-balance-sheet financing arrangements, other than operating leases entered into in the ordinary course of business, variable interest entities, letters of credit, and Ameren (parent) guarantee arrangements on behalf of its subsidiaries. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further detail concerning variable interest entities.
The following table presents the components of “Other Income, Net” in the Ameren Companies’ statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
2018
2017
2016
Ameren:
Other
Income, Net
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
$
36
$
24
$
27
Interest
income on industrial development revenue bonds
26
26
27
Other interest income
7
8
13
Non-service
cost components of net periodic benefit income
70
(a)
44
56
Other income
8
5
10
Donations
(33
)
(8
)
(16
)
Other
expense
(12
)
(13
)
(16
)
Total Other Income, Net
$
102
$
86
$
101
Ameren
Missouri:
Other Income, Net
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
$
27
$
21
$
23
Interest
income on industrial development revenue bonds
26
26
27
Other interest income
2
1
1
Non-service
cost components of net periodic benefit income
17
(a)
22
18
Other income
4
3
3
Donations
(14
)
(2
)
(4
)
Other
expense
(6
)
(6
)
(6
)
Total Other Income, Net
$
56
$
65
$
62
Ameren
Illinois:
Other Income, Net
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
$
9
$
3
$
4
Interest
income
6
7
12
Non-service cost components of net periodic benefit income
34
10
24
Other
income
3
2
6
Donations
(6
)
(5
)
(6
)
Other
expense
(4
)
(5
)
(6
)
Total Other Income, Net
$
42
$
12
$
34
.
(a)
For
the year ended December 31, 2018, the non-service cost components of net periodic benefit income were partially offset by a $17 million deferral due to a regulatory tracking mechanism for the difference between the level of such costs incurred by Ameren Missouri under GAAP and the level of such costs included in rates.
NOTE 7 – DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
We use derivatives to manage the risk of changes in market prices for natural gas and power, as well as the risk of changes in rail transportation surcharges through fuel oil hedges. Such price fluctuations may cause the following:
•
an
unrealized appreciation or depreciation of our contracted commitments to purchase or sell when purchase or sale prices under the commitments are compared with current commodity prices;
•
market values of natural gas inventories that differ from the cost of those commodities in inventory; and
•
actual cash outlays for the purchase of these commodities that differ from anticipated cash outlays.
The derivatives that we use to hedge these risks are governed by our
risk management policies for forward contracts, futures, options, and swaps. Our net positions are continually assessed within our structured hedging programs to determine whether new or offsetting transactions are required. The goal of the hedging program is generally to mitigate financial risks while ensuring that sufficient volumes are available to meet our requirements. Contracts we enter into as part of our risk management program may be settled financially, settled by physical delivery, or net settled with the counterparty.
The following table presents open gross commodity contract volumes by commodity type for derivative assets and liabilities as
of December 31, 2018 and 2017. As of December 31, 2018, these contracts extended through October 2021, March 2023, and May 2032 for fuel oils, natural gas, and power, respectively.
Quantity
(in millions)
2018
2017
Commodity
Ameren Missouri
Ameren Illinois
Ameren
Ameren Missouri
Ameren Illinois
Ameren
Fuel oils (in gallons)(a)
66
—
66
28
—
28
Natural
gas (in mmbtu)
19
154
173
24
139
163
Power (in megawatthours)
1
8
9
3
9
12
(a)
Consists
of ultra-low-sulfur diesel products.
All contracts considered to be derivative instruments are required to be recorded on the balance sheet at their fair values, unless the NPNS exception applies. See Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements for discussion of our methods of assessing the fair value of derivative instruments. Many of our physical contracts, such as our purchased power contracts, qualify for the NPNS exception to derivative accounting rules. The revenue or expense on NPNS contracts is recognized at the contract price upon physical delivery.
If we determine that a contract meets the definition of a derivative and is not eligible for the NPNS exception, we review the contract to determine whether the resulting gains or losses qualify for regulatory deferral. Derivative contracts that qualify for regulatory deferral are recorded at fair value, with changes in
fair value recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities in the period in which the change occurs. We believe derivative losses and gains deferred as regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of recovery, or refund, through future rates charged to customers. Regulatory assets and liabilities are amortized to operating income as related losses and gains are reflected in rates charged to customers. Therefore, gains and losses on these derivatives have no effect on operating income. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, all contracts that met the definition of a derivative and were not eligible for the NPNS exception received regulatory deferral.
The following table presents the carrying value and balance sheet location of all derivative
commodity contracts, none of which were designated as hedging instruments, as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:
2018
2017
Commodity
Balance
Sheet Location
Ameren
Missouri
Ameren
Illinois
Ameren
Ameren
Missouri
Ameren
Illinois
Ameren
Fuel
oils
Other current assets
$
3
$
—
$
3
$
5
$
—
$
5
Other
assets
5
—
5
2
—
2
Natural
gas
Other current assets
—
1
1
—
—
—
Other
assets
—
2
2
1
—
1
Power
Other
current assets
4
—
4
9
—
9
Total
assets
$
12
$
3
$
15
$
17
$
—
$
17
Fuel
oils
Other current liabilities
$
4
$
—
$
4
$
—
$
—
$
—
Other
deferred credits and liabilities
9
—
9
—
—
—
Natural
gas
Other current liabilities
4
8
12
5
12
17
Other
deferred credits and liabilities
1
6
7
3
10
13
Power
Other
current liabilities
4
14
18
1
13
14
Other
deferred credits and liabilities
—
169
169
—
182
182
Total
liabilities
$
22
$
197
$
219
$
9
$
217
$
226
Derivative
instruments are subject to various credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to the transaction. Exchange-traded contracts are supported by the financial and credit quality of the clearing members of the respective exchanges; these contracts have nominal credit risk. In all other transactions, we are exposed to credit risk. Our credit risk management program involves establishing credit limits and collateral requirements for counterparties, using master netting arrangements or similar agreements, and reporting daily exposure to senior management.
We believe that entering into master netting arrangements or similar agreements mitigates the level of financial loss that could result from default by allowing net settlement of derivative assets and liabilities. These master netting arrangements allow the counterparties to net settle sale and purchase transactions. Further, collateral requirements are
calculated at the master netting arrangement or similar agreement level by counterparty.
The Ameren Companies elect to present the fair value amounts of derivative assets and derivative liabilities subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement at the gross amounts on the balance sheet. However, if the gross amounts recognized on
the balance sheet were netted with derivative instruments and cash collateral received or posted, the net amounts would not be materially different from the gross amounts at December 31, 2018
and 2017.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
In determining our concentrations of credit risk related to derivative instruments, we review our individual counterparties and categorize each counterparty into groupings according to the primary business in which each engages. We calculate maximum exposures based on the gross fair value of financial instruments, including NPNS and other accrual contracts. These exposures are calculated on a gross basis, which include affiliate exposure not eliminated at the consolidated Ameren level. As of December 31, 2018, if counterparty groups were to fail completely to perform on contracts, the Ameren Companies’ maximum exposure would have been immaterial with or
without consideration of the application of master netting arrangements or similar agreements and collateral held.
Derivative Instruments with Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features
Our commodity contracts contain collateral provisions tied to the Ameren Companies’ credit ratings. If our credit ratings were downgraded below investment grade, or if a counterparty with reasonable grounds for uncertainty regarding our ability to satisfy an obligation requested adequate assurance of performance, additional collateral postings might be required. The following table presents, as of December 31, 2018, the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit risk-related contingent features in a gross liability position, the cash collateral posted, and the aggregate amount of additional
collateral that counterparties could require. The additional collateral required is the net liability position allowed under the master netting arrangements or similar agreements, assuming (1) the credit risk-related contingent features underlying these arrangements were triggered on December 31, 2018, and (2) those counterparties with rights to do so requested collateral.
Aggregate Fair Value of
Derivative Liabilities(a)
Cash
Collateral Posted
Potential Aggregate Amount of
Additional Collateral Required(b)
Ameren
Missouri
$
76
$
4
$
64
Ameren Illinois
37
—
30
Ameren
$
113
$
4
$
94
(a)
Before
consideration of master netting arrangements or similar agreements and including NPNS and other accrual contract exposures.
(b)
As collateral requirements with certain counterparties are based on master netting arrangements or similar agreements, the aggregate amount of additional collateral required to be posted is determined after consideration of the effects of such arrangements.
NOTE 8 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability
(an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. We use various methods to determine fair value, including market, income, and cost approaches. With these approaches, we adopt certain assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about market risk or the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation. Inputs to valuation can be readily observable, market-corroborated, or unobservable. We use valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Authoritative accounting guidance established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. All financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following three hierarchy levels:
Level 1
(quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities): Inputs based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities are primarily exchange-traded derivatives and assets, including cash and cash equivalents and listed equity securities.
The market approach is used to measure the fair value of equity securities held in Ameren Missouri’s nuclear decommissioning trust fund. Equity securities in this fund are representative of the S&P 500 index, excluding securities of Ameren Corporation, owners and/or operators of nuclear power plants, and the trustee and investment managers. The S&P 500 index comprises stocks of large-capitalization companies.
Level 2 (significant other observable inputs): Market-based inputs corroborated by third-party brokers or exchanges based
on transacted market data. Level 2 assets and liabilities include certain assets held in Ameren Missouri’s nuclear decommissioning trust fund, including United States Treasury and agency securities, corporate bonds and other fixed-income securities, and certain over-the-counter derivative instruments, including natural gas and financial power transactions.
Fixed income securities are valued by using prices from independent industry-recognized data vendors who provide values that are either exchange-based or matrix-based. The fair value measurements of fixed-income securities classified as Level 2 are based on inputs
other
than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability. Examples are matrix pricing, market corroborated pricing, and inputs such as yield curves and indices.
Derivative instruments classified as Level 2 are valued by corroborated observable inputs, such as pricing services or prices from similar instruments that trade in liquid markets. Our development and corroboration process entails obtaining multiple quotes or prices from outside sources. To derive our forward view to price our derivative instruments at fair value, we average the bid/ask spreads to the midpoints. To validate forward prices obtained from outside parties, we compare the pricing to recently settled market transactions. Additionally, a review of all sources is performed to identify any anomalies or potential errors. Further, we consider the volume of transactions on certain trading platforms in our reasonableness assessment of the averaged midpoints.
The value of natural gas derivative contracts is based upon exchange closing prices without significant unobservable adjustments. The value of power derivative contracts is based upon exchange closing prices or the use of multiple forward prices provided by third parties. The prices are averaged and shaped to a monthly profile when needed without significant unobservable adjustments.
Level 3 (significant other unobservable inputs): Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. Level 3 assets and liabilities are valued by internally developed models and assumptions or methodologies that use significant unobservable inputs. Level 3 assets and liabilities include derivative instruments that trade in less liquid markets, where pricing is largely unobservable. We value Level 3 instruments by using pricing models with inputs that are often unobservable in the market, such as certain internal
assumptions, quotes or prices from outside sources not supported by a liquid market, or escalation rates. Our development and corroboration process entails reasonableness reviews and an evaluation of all sources to identify any anomalies or potential errors.
We perform an analysis each quarter to determine the appropriate hierarchy level of the assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurements. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety according to the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. All assets and liabilities whose fair value measurement is based on significant unobservable inputs are classified as Level 3.
We consider nonperformance risk in our valuation of derivative instruments by analyzing the credit standing of our counterparties and considering any counterparty credit enhancements (e.g., collateral). The
guidance also requires that the fair value measurement of liabilities reflect the nonperformance risk of the reporting entity, as applicable. Therefore, we have factored the impact of our credit standing, as well as any potential credit enhancements, into the fair value measurement of both derivative assets and derivative liabilities. Included in our valuation, and based on current market conditions, is a valuation adjustment for counterparty default derived from market data such as the price of credit default swaps, bond yields, and credit ratings. No material gains or losses related to valuation adjustments for counterparty default risk were recorded at Ameren, Ameren Missouri, or Ameren Illinois in 2018, 2017, or 2016. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the counterparty default
risk valuation adjustment related to derivative contracts was immaterial for Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois.
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:
The
derivative asset and liability balances are presented net of registrant and counterparty credit considerations.
(b)
Balance excludes $5 million and $4 million of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, payables, and accrued income, net for December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
See Note 10 – Retirement Benefits for tables that set forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, Ameren’s pension and postretirement plan assets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Level 3 fuel oils and natural gas derivative contract assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were immaterial for all periods presented. The following table presents the fair value reconciliation of Level 3 power derivative contract assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017:
2018
2017
Ameren
Missouri
Ameren
Illinois
Ameren
Ameren
Missouri
Ameren
Illinois
Ameren
Beginning
balance at January 1
$
7
$
(195
)
$
(188
)
$
7
$
(185
)
$
(178
)
Realized
and unrealized gains (losses) included in regulatory assets/liabilities
(6
)
—
(6
)
(4
)
(21
)
(25
)
Purchases
5
—
5
14
—
14
Sales
—
—
—
1
—
1
Settlements
(5
)
12
7
(11
)
11
—
Transfers
out of Level 3
(1
)
—
(1
)
—
—
—
Ending
balance at December 31
$
—
$
(183
)
$
(183
)
$
7
$
(195
)
$
(188
)
Change
in unrealized gains (losses) related to assets/liabilities held at December 31
$
(1
)
$
(2
)
$
(3
)
$
—
$
(22
)
$
(22
)
Transfers
into or out of Level 3 represent either (1) existing assets and liabilities that were previously categorized as a higher level, but were recategorized to Level 3 because the inputs to the model became unobservable during the period, or (2) existing assets and liabilities that were previously classified as Level 3, but were recategorized to a higher level because the lowest significant input became observable during the period. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, there were no material transfers between Level 1 and Level 2, Level 1 and Level 3, or Level 2 and Level 3 related to derivative commodity contracts.
All gains or losses related to our Level 3 derivative commodity contracts are expected to be recovered or returned through
customer rates; therefore, there is no impact to net income resulting from changes in the fair value of these instruments.
The following table describes the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs utilized for the fair value of our Level 3 power derivative contract assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Fair
Value(a)
Weighted
Commodity
Assets
Liabilities
Valuation Technique(s)
Unobservable Input
Range
Average
2018
Power(b)
$
3
$
(186
)
Discounted
cash flow
Average forward peak and off-peak pricing – forwards/swaps($/MWh)(c)
23 – 39
28
Nodal basis($/MWh)(c)
(9)
– 0
(2)
Fundamental energy production model
Estimated future natural gas prices($/mmbtu)(c)
3 – 4
3
Escalation
rate(%)(c)(d)
4 – 5
4
2017
Power(b)
$
8
$
(196
)
Discounted
cash flow
Average forward peak and off-peak pricing – forwards/swaps($/MWh)(c)
24 – 46
28
Nodal basis($/MWh)(c)
(10) – 0
(2)
Fundamental
energy production model
Estimated future natural gas prices($/mmbtu)(c)
3 – 4
3
Escalation rate(%)(c)(d)
5
5
(a)The
derivative asset and liability balances are presented net of registrant and counterparty credit considerations.
(b)
Power valuations use visible third-party pricing evaluated by month for peak and off-peak demand through 2022 and 2021 for December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Valuations beyond 2022 and 2021 for December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, use fundamentally modeled pricing by month for peak and off-peak demand.
(c)
Generally,
significant increases (decreases) in this input in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.
(d)
Escalation rate applies to power prices in 2031 and beyond.
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the carrying amount and fair value of financial assets and liabilities disclosed, but not carried, at fair value as of December 31,
2018 and 2017:
Investments
in held-to-maturity debt securities(a)
276
—
276
—
276
Short-term
debt
484
—
484
—
484
Long-term
debt (including current portion)(a)
7,935
(b)
—
8,531
—
8,531
Ameren
Missouri:
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
$
7
$
7
$
—
$
—
$
7
Investments
in held-to-maturity debt securities(a)
276
—
276
—
276
Short-term
debt
39
—
39
—
39
Long-term
debt (including current portion)(a)
3,961
(b)
—
4,348
—
4,348
Ameren
Illinois:
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
$
41
$
41
$
—
$
—
$
41
Short-term
debt
62
—
62
—
62
Long-term
debt (including current portion)
2,830
(b)
—
3,028
—
3,028
(a)
Ameren
and Ameren Missouri have investments in industrial development revenue bonds, classified as held-to-maturity and recorded in “Other Assets,” that are equal to the finance obligations for the Peno Creek and Audrain CT energy centers. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the carrying amount of both the investments in industrial development revenue bonds and the finance obligations approximated fair value.
(b)
Included unamortized debt issuance costs, which were excluded from the fair value measurement, of $58 million,
$22 million, and $31 million for Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois, respectively, as of December 31, 2018. Included unamortized debt issuance costs, which were excluded from the fair value measurement, of $50 million, $20 million, and $24 million for Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois, respectively, as of December 31, 2017.
(c)
The
Level 3 fair value amount consists of ATXI’s senior unsecured notes. In the first quarter of 2018, the amount was transferred to Level 3 because inputs to the valuation model became unobservable during the period.
NOTE 9 – CALLAWAY ENERGY CENTER
Spent Nuclear Fuel
Under the NWPA, the DOE is responsible for disposing of spent nuclear fuel from the Callaway energy center and other commercial nuclear energy centers. As required by the NWPA, Ameren Missouri and other utilities have entered into standard contracts with the DOE, which stated that the DOE would begin to dispose of spent nuclear fuel by 1998. However, the DOE has failed to fulfill its disposal obligations, and Ameren Missouri and other nuclear
energy center owners sued the DOE to recover costs incurred for ongoing storage of their spent fuel. Ameren Missouri’s lawsuit against the DOE resulted in a settlement agreement that provides for annual reimbursement of additional spent fuel storage and related costs. Ameren Missouri received reimbursements from the DOE of $11 million, $3 million, and $24 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Ameren Missouri will continue to apply for reimbursement from the DOE for allowable costs associated with the ongoing storage of spent fuel. The DOE’s delay in carrying out its obligation to dispose of spent nuclear fuel from the Callaway energy center is not expected to adversely affect the continued operations of the energy center.
Electric rates charged to customers provide for the recovery of the Callaway energy center’s decommissioning costs, which include decontamination, dismantling, and site restoration costs, over the expected life of the nuclear energy center. Amounts collected from customers are deposited into the external nuclear decommissioning trust fund to provide for the Callaway energy center’s decommissioning. It is assumed that the Callaway energy center site will be decommissioned through the immediate dismantlement method and removed from service. Ameren and Ameren Missouri have recorded an ARO for the Callaway energy center decommissioning costs at fair value, which represents the present value of estimated future cash outflows. Annual decommissioning costs of $7 million are included in the
costs used to establish electric rates for Ameren Missouri’s customers. Every three years, the MoPSC requires Ameren Missouri to file an updated cost study and funding analysis for decommissioning its Callaway energy center. An updated cost study and funding analysis was filed with the MoPSC in September 2017 and reflected within the ARO. In January 2018, the MoPSC approved no change in electric rates for decommissioning costs consistent with Ameren Missouri’s updated cost study and funding analysis.
The fair value of the trust fund for Ameren Missouri’s Callaway energy center is reported as “Nuclear decommissioning trust fund” in Ameren’s and Ameren Missouri’s balance sheets. This amount is legally restricted and may be used only to fund the costs of nuclear decommissioning. Changes in the fair value of the trust fund are recorded as an increase or decrease to the nuclear decommissioning trust fund, with an offsetting
adjustment to the related regulatory liability. If the assumed return on trust assets is not earned, Ameren Missouri believes that it is probable that any such earnings deficiency will be recovered in rates.
Ameren Missouri has investments in debt and equity securities that are held in a trust fund for the purpose of funding the decommissioning of its Callaway energy center. We have classified these investments as available for sale, and we have recorded all such investments at their fair market value at December 31, 2018 and 2017. Investments in the nuclear decommissioning trust fund have a target allocation of 60% to 70% in equity securities,
with the balance invested in debt securities.
The following table presents proceeds from the sale and maturities of investments in Ameren Missouri’s nuclear decommissioning trust fund and the gross realized gains and losses resulting from those sales for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
2018
2017
2016
Proceeds
from sales and maturities
$
299
$
305
$
304
Gross realized gains
18
13
7
Gross
realized losses
5
5
4
Net realized and unrealized gains and losses are deferred and are currently reflected in the regulatory liability related to AROs on Ameren’s and Ameren Missouri’s balance sheets. This reporting is consistent with the method used to account for the decommissioning costs recovered in rates. Gains or losses associated with assets
in the trust fund could result in lower or higher funding requirements for decommissioning costs, which are expected to be reflected in electric rates paid by Ameren Missouri’s customers. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters.
The following table presents the costs and fair values of investments in debt and equity securities in Ameren’s and Ameren Missouri’s nuclear decommissioning trust fund at December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Security
Type
Cost
Gross Unrealized Gain
Gross Unrealized Loss
Fair Value
2018
Debt
securities
$
253
$
3
$
4
$
252
Equity
securities
162
277
12
427
Cash and cash equivalents
3
—
—
3
Other(a)
2
—
—
2
Total
$
420
$
280
$
16
$
684
2017
Debt
securities
$
228
$
5
$
1
$
232
Equity
securities
155
318
5
468
Cash and cash equivalents
2
—
—
2
Other(a)
2
—
—
2
Total
$
387
$
323
$
6
$
704
(a)
Represents
net receivables and payables relating to pending security sales, interest, and security purchases.
The following table presents the costs and fair values of investments in debt securities in Ameren’s and Ameren Missouri’s nuclear decommissioning trust fund according to their contractual maturities at December 31, 2018:
Cost
Fair Value
Less
than 5 years
$
140
$
140
5 years to 10 years
48
47
Due
after 10 years
65
65
Total
$
253
$
252
There
are unrealized losses relating to certain available-for-sale investments included in the nuclear decommissioning trust fund, deferred within the regulatory liability as discussed above. Decommissioning will not occur until Ameren Missouri’s nuclear energy center is retired. The Callaway energy center’s operating license expires in 2044.
Insurance
The following table presents insurance coverage at Ameren Missouri’s Callaway energy center at December 31, 2018. The property coverage and the nuclear liability coverage renewal dates are April 1 and January 1, respectively, of each year. Both coverages were renewed in 2018.
Type
and Source of Coverage
Maximum Coverages
Maximum Assessments
for Single Incidents
Public liability and nuclear worker liability:
American Nuclear Insurers
$
450
$
—
Pool
participation
13,623
(a)
138
(b)
$
14,073
(c)
$
138
Property
damage:
NEIL and EMANI
$
3,200
(d)
$
27
(e)
Replacement
power:
NEIL
$
490
(f)
$
7
(e)
(a)
Provided
through mandatory participation in an industrywide retrospective premium assessment program. The maximum coverage available is dependent on the number of United States commercial reactors participating in the program.
(b)
Retrospective premium under the Price-Anderson Act. This is subject to retrospective assessment with respect to a covered loss in excess of $450 million in the event of an incident at any licensed United States commercial reactor, payable at $21 million per year.
(c)
Limit
of liability for each incident under the Price-Anderson liability provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. This limit is subject to change to account for the effects of inflation and changes in the number of licensed reactors.
(d)
NEIL provides $2.7 billion in property damage, stabilization, decontamination, and premature decommissioning insurance for radiation events and $2.3 billion in property damage insurance for nonradiation events. EMANI provides $490 million in property damage insurance for both radiation and nonradiation events.
(e)
All
NEIL insured plants could be subject to assessments should losses exceed the accumulated funds from NEIL.
(f)
Provides replacement power cost insurance in the event of a prolonged accidental outage. Weekly indemnity up to $4.5 million for 52 weeks, which commences after the first 12 weeks of an outage, plus up to $3.6 million per week for a minimum of 71 weeks thereafter for a total not exceeding the policy limit of $490 million. Nonradiation events are limited to $328 million.
The Price-Anderson
Act is a federal law that limits the liability for claims from an incident involving any licensed United States commercial nuclear energy center. The limit is based on the number of licensed reactors. The limit of liability and the maximum potential annual payments are adjusted at least every five years for inflation to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index. The most recent five-year inflationary adjustment became effective in November 2018. Owners of a nuclear reactor cover this exposure through a combination of private insurance and mandatory participation in a financial protection pool, as established by the Price-Anderson Act.
Losses resulting from terrorist attacks on nuclear facilities insured by NEIL are subject to industrywide aggregates, such that terrorist acts against one or more commercial nuclear power plants within a stated time period would be treated as a single
event, and the owners of the nuclear power plants would share the limit of liability. NEIL policies have an aggregate limit of $3.2 billion within a 12-month period for radiation events, or $1.8 billion for events not involving radiation contamination. The EMANI policies are not subject to industrywide aggregates in the event of terrorist attacks on nuclear facilities.
If losses from a nuclear incident at the Callaway energy center exceed the limits of, or are not covered by insurance, or if coverage is unavailable, Ameren Missouri is at risk for any uninsured losses. If a serious nuclear incident were to occur, it could have a material adverse effect on Ameren’s and Ameren Missouri’s results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.
NOTE
10 – RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The primary objective of the Ameren pension and postretirement benefit plans is to provide eligible employees with pension and postretirement health care and life insurance benefits. Ameren has defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans covering
substantially all of its union employees. Ameren has defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all of its non-union employees and postretirement benefit plans covering non-union employees hired before October 2015. Ameren uses a measurement date of December 31 for its pension
and postretirement benefit plans. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois each participate in Ameren’s single-employer pension and other postretirement plans. Ameren’s qualified pension plan is the Ameren Retirement Plan. Ameren also has an unfunded nonqualified pension plan, the Ameren Supplemental Retirement Plan, which is available to provide certain management employees and retirees with a supplemental benefit when their qualified pension plan benefits are capped in compliance with Internal Revenue Code limitations. Ameren’s other postretirement plan is the Ameren Retiree Welfare Benefit Plan. Only Ameren subsidiaries participate in the plans listed above.
Ameren’s unfunded obligation under its pension and other postretirement benefit plans was $481 million and $551 million as of December 31,
2018 and 2017, respectively. These net liabilities are recorded in “Other current liabilities,”“Pension and other postretirement benefits,” and “Other assets” on Ameren’s consolidated balance sheet. The decrease in the unfunded obligation during 2018 was the result of a 75 basis point increase in the pension and other postretirement benefit plan discount rates used to determine the present value of the obligation offset by a decrease in the return on plan assets of the pension and postretirement trusts. The decrease in the unfunded obligation also resulted in a decrease to “Regulatory assets” on Ameren’s, Ameren Missouri’s, and Ameren Illinois’ balance sheets.
The following table presents the net benefit liability recorded on the balance sheets of each of the Ameren Companies
as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:
2018
2017
Ameren(a)
$
481
$
551
Ameren
Missouri
229
215
Ameren Illinois(a)
120
213
(a)
Assets
associated with other postretirement benefits are recorded in “Other assets” on the balance sheet.
Ameren recognizes the underfunded status of its pension and postretirement plans as a liability on its consolidated balance sheet, with offsetting entries to accumulated OCI and regulatory assets. The following table presents the funded status of Ameren’s pension and postretirement benefit plans as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. It also provides
the amounts included in regulatory assets and accumulated OCI at December 31, 2018 and 2017, that have not been recognized in net periodic benefit costs.
2018
2017
Pension Benefits
Postretirement
Benefits
Pension Benefits
Postretirement
Benefits
Accumulated
benefit obligation at end of year
$
4,258
$
(a)
$
4,577
$
(a)
Change
in benefit obligation:
Net benefit obligation at beginning of year
$
4,827
$
1,240
$
4,518
$
1,170
Service
cost
100
21
93
21
Interest cost
169
40
179
47
Plan
amendments
—
(49
)
—
—
Participant contributions
—
9
—
8
Actuarial
(gain) loss
(401
)
(163
)
255
53
Benefits paid
(236
)
(64
)
(218
)
(59
)
Net
benefit obligation at end of year
4,459
1,034
4,827
1,240
Change in plan assets:
Fair
value of plan assets at beginning of year
4,293
1,223
3,813
1,101
Actual return on plan assets
(218
)
(57
)
634
171
Employer
contributions
60
2
64
2
Participant contributions
—
9
—
8
Benefits
paid
(236
)
(64
)
(218
)
(59
)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
3,899
1,113
4,293
1,223
Funded
status – deficiency (surplus)
560
(79
)
534
17
Accrued benefit cost (asset) at December 31
$
560
$
(79
)
$
534
$
17
Amounts
recognized in the balance sheet consist of:
Noncurrent asset(b)
$
—
$
(79
)
$
—
$
—
Current
liability(c)
2
—
3
3
Noncurrent liability
558
—
531
14
Net
liability (asset) recognized
$
560
$
(79
)
$
534
$
17
Amounts
recognized in regulatory assets consist of:
Net actuarial (gain) loss
$
393
$
(91
)
$
374
$
(69
)
Prior
service credit
(2
)
(48
)
(3
)
(3
)
Amounts (pretax) recognized in accumulated OCI consist of:
Net
actuarial loss
35
3
30
2
Total
$
426
$
(136
)
$
401
$
(70
)
(a)
Not
applicable.
(b)
Included in “Other assets” on Ameren’s consolidated balance sheet.
(c)
Included in “Other current liabilities” on Ameren’s consolidated balance sheet.
The following table presents the assumptions used to determine our benefit obligations at December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Pension Benefits
Postretirement Benefits
2018
2017
2018
2017
Discount
rate at measurement date
4.25
%
3.50
%
4.25
%
3.50
%
Increase in future compensation
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
Medical
cost trend rate (initial)(a)
(b)
(b)
5.00
5.00
Medical cost trend rate (ultimate)(a)
(b)
(b)
5.00
5.00
(a)
Initial
and ultimate medical cost trend rate for certain Medicare-eligible participants is 3.00%.
(b)
Not applicable.
Ameren determines discount rate assumptions by identifying a theoretical settlement portfolio of high-quality corporate bonds sufficient to provide for a plan’s projected benefit payments. The settlement portfolio of bonds is selected from a pool of nearly 600 high-quality corporate bonds. A single discount rate is then determined; that rate results in a discounted value of the plan’s benefit payments that equates to the market value of the selected bonds. In addition, during 2018,
Ameren adopted the Society of Actuaries 2018 Mortality Improvement
Scale. The updated scale assumes a lower rate of mortality improvement as compared to the 2017 Mortality Improvement Scale that Ameren used in 2017, resulting in a decrease to our pension and other postretirement benefit obligations.
Funding
Pension benefits are based on the employees’ years of service, age, and compensation. Ameren’s pension plans are funded in compliance with income tax regulations, federal funding, and other regulatory requirements. As a result, Ameren expects to fund its pension
plan at a level equal to the greater of the pension cost or the legally required minimum contribution. Based on its assumptions at December 31, 2018, its investment performance in 2018, and its pension funding policy, Ameren expects to make annual contributions of approximately $20 million to $70 million in each of the next five years, with aggregate estimated contributions of $200 million. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois estimate that their portion of the future funding requirements will be 30% and 60%, respectively. These estimates may change based on actual investment performance, changes in interest rates, changes in our assumptions,
changes in government regulations, and any voluntary contributions. Our funding policy for postretirement benefits is primarily to fund the Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association (VEBA) trusts to match the annual postretirement expense.
The following table presents the cash contributions made to our defined benefit retirement plan and to our postretirement plans during 2018, 2017, and 2016:
Pension
Benefits
Postretirement Benefits
2018
2017
2016
2018
2017
2016
Ameren
Missouri
$
18
$
19
$
21
$
1
$
1
$
1
Ameren
Illinois
35
37
30
1
1
1
Other
7
8
6
—
—
—
Ameren
$
60
$
64
$
57
$
2
$
2
$
2
Investment
Strategy and Policies
Ameren manages plan assets in accordance with the “prudent investor” guidelines contained in ERISA. The investment committee, which includes members of senior management, approves and implements investment strategy and asset allocation guidelines for the plan assets. The investment committee’s goals are twofold: first, to ensure that sufficient funds are available to provide the benefits at the time they are payable; and second, to maximize total return on plan assets and to minimize expense volatility consistent with its tolerance for risk. Ameren delegates the task of investment management to specialists in each asset class. As appropriate, Ameren provides each investment manager with guidelines that specify allowable and prohibited investment types. The investment committee regularly monitors manager performance and compliance with investment guidelines.
The
expected return on plan assets assumption is based on historical and projected rates of return for current and planned asset classes in the investment portfolio. Projected rates of return for each asset class were estimated after an analysis of historical experience, future expectations, and the volatility of the various asset classes. After considering the target asset allocation for each asset class, we adjusted the overall expected rate of return for the portfolio for historical and expected experience of active portfolio management results compared with benchmark returns and for the effect of expenses paid from plan assets. Ameren will use an expected return on plan assets for its pension and postretirement plan assets of 7.00% in 2019. No plan assets are expected to be returned to Ameren during 2019.
Ameren’s investment committee strives to assemble a portfolio of diversified assets that does not create a significant concentration of risks. The investment committee develops asset allocation guidelines between asset classes, and it creates diversification through investments in assets that differ by type (equity, debt, real estate, private equity), duration, market capitalization, country, style (growth or value), and industry, among other factors. The diversification of assets is displayed in the target allocation table below. The investment committee also routinely rebalances the plan assets to adhere to the diversification goals. The investment committee’s strategy reduces the concentration of investment risk; however, Ameren is still subject to overall market risk. The following table presents our target allocations for 2019 and our pension
and postretirement plans’ asset categories as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:
In general, the United States large-capitalization equity investments are passively managed or indexed, whereas the international, global, United States small-capitalization, and United States mid-capitalization equity investments are actively managed by investment managers. Debt securities include a broad range of fixed-income vehicles. Debt security investments in high-yield securities and non-United-States-dollar-denominated securities are owned by the plans, but in limited quantities to reduce risk. Most of the debt security investments are under active management by investment managers. Real estate investments include private real estate vehicles; however, Ameren does not, by policy, hold direct investments in real estate property. Additionally, Ameren’s investment committee allows investment managers to use derivatives, such as index futures, foreign exchange futures, and options,
in certain situations to increase or to reduce market exposure in an efficient and timely manner.
Fair Value Measurements of Plan Assets
Investments in the pension and postretirement benefit plans were stated at fair value as of December 31, 2018. The fair value of an asset is the amount that would be received upon its sale in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Cash and cash equivalents have initial maturities of three months or less and are recorded at cost plus accrued interest. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments. Investments traded in active markets on national or international securities exchanges are valued at closing prices on the measurement date or,
if that is not a business day, on the last business day before that date. Securities traded in over-the-counter markets are valued by quoted market prices, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. Investments measured under NAV as a practical expedient are based on the fair values of the underlying assets provided by the funds and their administrators. The fair value of real estate investments is based on NAV; it is determined by annual appraisal reports prepared by an independent real estate appraiser. Investments measured at NAV often provide for daily, monthly, or quarterly redemptions with 60 or less days of notice depending on the fund. For some funds, redemption may also require approval from the fund’s board of directors. Derivative contracts are valued at fair value, as determined by the investment managers (or independent third parties on behalf of the investment managers), who use proprietary
models and take into consideration exchange quotations on underlying instruments, dealer quotations, and other market information.
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements, the pension plans’ assets measured at fair value as of December 31, 2018:
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identified
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Other
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Measured at NAV
Total
Cash
and cash equivalents
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
41
$
41
Equity
securities:
U.S. large-capitalization
—
—
—
955
955
U.S.
small- and mid-capitalization
272
—
—
—
272
International
224
—
—
298
522
Global
—
—
—
321
321
Debt
securities:
Corporate bonds
—
701
—
19
720
Municipal
bonds
—
87
—
—
87
U.S.
Treasury and agency securities
—
891
—
—
891
Other
1
11
—
—
12
Real
estate
—
—
—
202
202
Private
equity
—
—
—
3
3
Total
$
497
$
1,690
$
—
$
1,839
$
4,026
Less:
Medical benefit assets at December 31(a)
(144
)
Plus: Net receivables at December 31(b)
17
Fair
value of pension plans’ assets at December 31
$
3,899
(a)
Medical
benefit (health and welfare) component for accounts maintained in accordance with Section 401(h) of the Internal Revenue Code to fund a portion of the postretirement obligation.
(b)
Receivables related to pending security sales, offset by payables related to pending security purchases.
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements, the pension plans’ assets measured at fair value as of December 31, 2017:
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identified
Assets or Liabilities
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Other
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Measured at NAV
Total
Cash
and cash equivalents
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
25
$
25
Equity
securities:
U.S. large-capitalization
—
—
—
1,523
1,523
U.S.
small- and mid-capitalization
379
—
—
—
379
International
179
—
—
450
629
Debt
securities:
Corporate bonds
—
726
—
15
741
Municipal
bonds
—
91
—
—
91
U.S.
Treasury and agency securities
8
816
—
—
824
Other
—
7
—
—
7
Real
estate
—
—
—
196
196
Private
equity
—
—
—
4
4
Total
$
566
$
1,640
$
—
$
2,213
$
4,419
Less:
Medical benefit assets at December 31(a)
(153
)
Plus: Net receivables at December 31(b)
27
Fair
value of pension plans’ assets at December 31
$
4,293
(a)
Medical
benefit (health and welfare) component for accounts maintained in accordance with Section 401(h) of the Internal Revenue Code to fund a portion of the postretirement obligation.
(b)
Receivables related to pending security sales, offset by payables related to pending security purchases.
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements, the postretirement
benefit plans’ assets measured at fair value as of December 31, 2018:
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identified Assets
(Level
1)
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Other
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Measured at NAV
Total
Cash
and cash equivalents
$
32
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
32
Equity
securities:
U.S. large-capitalization
297
—
—
89
386
U.S.
small- and mid-capitalization
63
—
—
—
63
International
45
—
—
84
129
Other
—
12
—
—
12
Debt
securities:
Corporate bonds
—
144
—
—
144
Municipal
bonds
—
107
—
—
107
U.S.
Treasury and agency securities
—
62
—
—
62
Other
—
7
—
34
41
Total
$
437
$
332
$
—
$
207
$
976
Plus:
Medical benefit assets at December 31(a)
144
Less: Net payables at December 31(b)
(7
)
Fair
value of postretirement benefit plans’ assets at December 31
$
1,113
(a)
Medical
benefit (health and welfare) component for 401(h) accounts to fund a portion of the postretirement obligation. These 401(h) assets are included in the pension plan assets shown above.
(b)
Payables related to pending security purchases, offset by interest receivables and receivables related to pending security sales.
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements, the postretirement benefit plans’ assets measured at fair value as of December 31, 2017:
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identified
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Other
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Measured at NAV
Total
Cash
and cash equivalents
$
44
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
44
Equity
securities:
U.S. large-capitalization
332
—
—
110
442
U.S.
small- and mid-capitalization
80
—
—
—
80
International
53
—
—
101
154
Other
—
8
—
—
8
Debt
securities:
Corporate bonds
—
144
—
—
144
Municipal
bonds
—
110
—
—
110
U.S.
Treasury and agency securities
—
76
—
—
76
Other
—
4
—
34
38
Total
$
509
$
342
$
—
$
245
$
1,096
Plus:
Medical benefit assets at December 31(a)
153
Less: Net payables at December 31(b)
(26
)
Fair
value of postretirement benefit plans’ assets at December 31
$
1,223
(a)
Medical
benefit (health and welfare) component for 401(h) accounts to fund a portion of the postretirement obligation. These 401(h) assets are included in the pension plan assets shown above.
(b)
Payables related to pending security purchases, offset by interest receivables and receivables related to pending security sales.
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
In March 2017, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that requires an entity to report, including on a retrospective basis, the non-service cost or income components of net periodic benefit cost separately from the service cost component and outside of operating income. The Ameren Companies adopted
this guidance, effective January 1, 2018, and as a result, $44 million, $22 million, and $10 million of net benefit income has been retrospectively reclassified from “Operating Expenses – Other operations and maintenance” to “Other Income, Net” on Ameren's, Ameren Missouri’s, and Ameren Illinois’ respective statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2017. Net benefit income of $56 million, $18 million, and $24 million has been similarly retrospectively reclassified on Ameren’s, Ameren Missouri’s, and Ameren Illinois’ respective statements of income for the year ended December 31,
2016.
The guidance also requires an entity to capitalize only the service cost component as part of an asset, such as inventory or property, plant, and equipment, on a prospective basis. Previously all of the net benefit cost components were eligible for capitalization. This change in the capitalization of net benefit costs is not expected to affect our ability to recover total net benefit cost through customer rates.
The following table presents the components of the net periodic benefit cost of Ameren’s pension and postretirement benefit plans during 2018, 2017,
and 2016:
Pension Benefits
Postretirement Benefits
2018
Service
cost(a)
$
100
$
21
Non-service cost components:
Interest cost
169
40
Expected
return on plan assets
(276
)
(77
)
Amortization of:
Prior service credit
(1
)
(4
)
Actuarial
(gain) loss
68
(6
)
Total non-service cost components(b)
$
(40
)
$
(47
)
Net
periodic benefit cost (income)
$
60
$
(26
)
2017
Service cost(a)
$
93
$
21
Non-service
cost components:
Interest cost
179
47
Expected return on plan assets
(262
)
(75
)
Amortization
of:
Prior service credit
(1
)
(5
)
Actuarial (gain) loss
55
(6
)
Total
non-service cost components(b)
$
(29
)
$
(39
)
Net periodic benefit cost (income)
$
64
$
(18
)
2016
Service
cost(a)
$
81
$
19
Non-service cost components:
Interest cost
185
50
Expected
return on plan assets
(253
)
(72
)
Amortization of:
Prior service credit
(1
)
(5
)
Actuarial
(gain) loss
32
(11
)
Total non-service cost components(b)
$
(37
)
$
(38
)
Net
periodic benefit cost (income)
$
44
$
(19
)
(a) Service cost, net of capitalization, is reflected in “Operating Expenses - Other operations and maintenance” on Ameren’s statement of income.
(b)
2018 amounts and the non-capitalized
portion of 2017 and 2016’s non-service cost components, as discussed above, are reflected in “Other Income, Net” on Ameren’s statement of income. See Note 5 - Other Income, Net for additional information.
The estimated amounts that will be amortized from regulatory assets and accumulated OCI into Ameren’s net periodic benefit cost in 2019 are as follows:
Pension Benefits
Postretirement Benefits
Regulatory
assets:
Prior service credit
$
(1
)
$
(5
)
Net actuarial (gain) loss
24
(15
)
Accumulated
OCI:
Net actuarial loss
2
—
Total
$
25
$
(20
)
Prior
service cost is amortized on a straight-line basis over the average future service of active participants benefiting under the plan amendment. Net actuarial gains or losses subject to amortization are amortized on a straight-line basis over 10 years.
The Ameren Companies are responsible for their share of the pension and postretirement benefit costs. The following table presents the pension costs and the postretirement benefit costs incurred for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
Does
not include the impact of the regulatory tracking mechanism for the difference between the level of pension and postretirement benefit costs incurred by Ameren Missouri and the level of such costs included in customer rates.
The expected pension and postretirement benefit payments from qualified trust and company funds, which reflect expected future service, as of December 31, 2018, are as follows:
Pension
Benefits
Postretirement Benefits
Paid from
Qualified
Trust Funds
Paid from
Company
Funds
Paid from
Qualified
Trust Funds
Paid from
Company
Funds
2019
$
267
$
3
$
57
$
2
2020
272
3
59
2
2021
282
3
61
2
2022
285
3
62
2
2023
286
3
64
2
2024
– 2028
1,439
12
315
12
The following table presents the assumptions used to determine net periodic
benefit cost for our pension and postretirement benefit plans for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
Pension Benefits
Postretirement Benefits
2018
2017
2016
2018
2017
2016
Discount
rate at measurement date
3.50
%
4.00
%
4.50
%
3.50
%
4.00
%
4.50
%
Expected
return on plan assets
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
Increase
in future compensation
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
Medical
cost trend rate (initial)(a)
(b)
(b)
(b)
5.00
5.00
5.00
Medical
cost trend rate (ultimate)(a)
(b)
(b)
(b)
5.00
5.00
5.00
(a)
Initial
and ultimate medical cost trend rate for certain Medicare-eligible participants is 3.00%.
(b)
Not applicable.
The table below reflects the sensitivity of Ameren’s plans to potential changes in key assumptions:
Pension
Benefits
Postretirement Benefits
Service Cost
and Interest
Cost
Projected
Benefit
Obligation
Service Cost
and Interest
Cost
Postretirement
Benefit
Obligation
0.25%
decrease in discount rate
$
(2
)
$
135
$
—
$
33
0.25%
increase in salary scale
2
12
—
—
1.00% increase in annual medical trend
—
—
4
58
1.00%
decrease in annual medical trend
—
—
(4
)
(58
)
Other
Ameren sponsors a 401(k) plan for eligible employees.
The Ameren 401(k) plan covered all eligible Ameren employees at December 31, 2018. The plan allows employees to contribute a portion of their compensation in accordance with specific guidelines. Ameren matches a percentage of the employee contributions up to certain limits. The following table presents the portion of the matching contribution to the Ameren 401(k) plan attributable to each of the Ameren Companies for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
The 2014 Incentive Plan is Ameren’s long-term stock-based compensation plan for eligible employees and directors. The 2014 Incentive Plan provides for a maximum of 8 million common shares to be available for grant to eligible employees and directors. At December 31, 2018, there were 3.8 million common shares remaining for grant under the 2014 Incentive Plan. The 2014 Incentive Plan awards may be stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance share units, cash-based awards, and other stock-based awards. Ameren used
newly issued shares to fulfill its stock-based compensation obligations for 2018 and intends to use newly issued shares to fulfill its stock-based compensation obligations for 2019.
The following table summarizes Ameren’s nonvested performance share unit and restricted stock unit activity for the year ended December 31, 2018:
Does
not include 712,572 undistributed vested performance share units.
(b)
Vested and undistributed units are awards that vested due to attainment of retirement eligibility by certain employees, but have not yet been distributed. For vested and undistributed performance share units, the number of shares issued for retirement-eligible employees will vary depending on actual performance over the three-year performance period.
(c)
Does not include 619,783
of vested and undistributed performance share units and 26,557 of vested and undistributed restricted stock units.
Performance Share Units
A performance share unit vests and entitles an employee to receive shares of Ameren common stock (plus accumulated dividends) if, at the end of the three-year performance period, certain specified market conditions have been met and if the individual remains employed by Ameren through the required vesting period. The vesting period for share units awarded extends beyond the three-year performance period to the payout date, which is approximately 38 months after the grant date. In the event of a participant’s
death or retirement at age 55 or older with five or more years of service, awards vest on a pro rata basis over the three-year performance period. The exact number of shares issued pursuant to a share unit varies from 0% to 200% of the target award, depending on actual company performance relative to the performance goals.
The fair value of each share unit awarded under the 2014 Incentive Plan is based on Ameren’s closing common share price at December 31st of the year prior to the award year and lattice simulations. Lattice simulations are used to estimate expected share payout based on Ameren’s total shareholder return for a three-year performance period relative to the designated peer group beginning
January 1st of the award year. The simulations can produce a greater fair value for the share unit than the applicable closing common share price because they include the weighted payout scenarios in which an increase in the share price has occurred. The significant assumptions used to calculate fair value also include a three-year risk-free rate, volatility for the peer group, and Ameren’s attainment of a three-year average earnings per share threshold during the performance period. The following table presents the fair value of each share unit awarded under the 2014 Incentive Plan along with the significant assumptions used to calculate the fair value of each share unit for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
2018
2017
2016
Fair
value of share units awarded
$62.88
$59.16
$44.13
Ameren’s closing common share price at December 31 of the prior year
$61.69
$52.46
$43.23
Three-year risk-free rate
1.98%
1.47%
1.31%
Volatility
range for the peer group(a)
15% – 23%
15% – 21%
15% – 20%
(a)
Based on a historical period that is equal to the remaining term of the performance period as of the grant date.
Restricted Stock Units
Restricted stock units vest and entitle an employee to
receive shares of Ameren common stock (plus accumulated dividends) if the individual remains employed with Ameren through the payment date of the awards. Generally, in the event of a participant’s death or retirement at age 55 or older with five or more years of service, awards vest on a pro rata basis. The payout date of the awards is approximately 38 months after the grant date. The fair value of each restricted stock unit is determined by Ameren’s closing common share price on the grant date.
The
following table presents the stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
2018
2017
2016
Ameren
Missouri
$
4
$
4
$
4
Ameren Illinois
3
2
2
Other(a)
13
12
11
Ameren
20
18
17
Less
income tax benefit
6
7
6
Stock-based compensation expense, net
$
14
$
11
$
11
(a)
Represents
compensation expense of employees of Ameren Services. These amounts are not included in the Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois amounts above.
Ameren settled performance share units and restricted stock units of $54 million, $39 million, and $83 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016. There were no significant stock-based compensation costs capitalized during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.
As of December 31, 2018, total compensation cost of $29 million related to nonvested awards not yet recognized is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 22 months.
Ameren realized income tax benefits for settled performance share units of $13 million, $15 million, and $31 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.
NOTE
12 – INCOME TAXES
Federal Tax Reform
The TCJA was enacted on December 22, 2017. Substantially all of the provisions of the TCJA affecting the Ameren Companies, other than certain transition depreciation rules, are effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. The TCJA includes significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code, including amendments that significantly change the taxation of business entities and specific provisions related to regulated public utilities. The most significant change that affects the Ameren Companies is the reduction in the federal corporate statutory income tax rate from 35% to 21%. Specific provisions
related to regulated public utilities generally allow for the continued deductibility of interest expense, the elimination of accelerated depreciation tax benefits from certain regulated utility capital investments acquired after September 27, 2017, and the continuation of certain rate normalization requirements related to the flow back of excess deferred taxes. Ameren (parent) is subject to provisions of the TCJA that limit the deductibility of interest expense, but such limitation did not affect Ameren in 2018.
In accordance with GAAP, the tax effects of changes in tax laws must be recognized in the period in which the law is enacted. GAAP also requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be measured at the tax rate that is expected to apply when temporary differences are realized or settled. Thus, in December 2017, the Ameren Companies’ deferred taxes were revalued using
the new tax rate. To the extent deferred tax balances are included in rate base, the revaluation of deferred taxes was deferred as a regulatory asset or liability on the balance sheet and will be collected from, or refunded, to customers. For deferred tax balances not included in rate base, the revaluation of deferred taxes was recorded as income tax expense. As of December 31, 2017, the Ameren Companies made reasonable estimates for the measurement and accounting of certain effects of the TCJA, which have been reflected in their financial statements. We recorded provisional estimates primarily related to depreciation transition rules and 2017 property, plant, and equipment, compensation, and pension-related deductions which would impact our revaluation of deferred taxes at December 31, 2017. The TCJA had the following provisional effects on the Ameren Companies for the
year ended December 31, 2017:
Ameren Missouri
Ameren Illinois
Other
Ameren
Increase
(Decrease)
Accumulated deferred income taxes, net
$
(1,419
)
$
(871
)
$
37
$
(2,253
)
Income
tax expense (benefit)
32
(5
)
127
154
Noncurrent regulatory assets
(89
)
(24
)
(1
)
(114
)
Noncurrent
regulatory liabilities
1,362
842
89
2,293
During the year ended December 31, 2018, Ameren,
Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois updated their respective provisional estimates in accordance with SEC staff guidance and recorded $13 million, $4 million, and $4 million, respectively, of income tax expense, primarily due to the application of proposed IRS regulations on depreciation transition rules. The offsetting impact to Ameren’s, Ameren Missouri’s, and Ameren Illinois’ regulatory asset and regulatory liability balances was immaterial. As of December 31, 2018, Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois have completed their accounting for certain effects of the TCJA.
For our regulated operations, reductions in accumulated deferred income tax balances due to the reduction in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate to 21% will result in amounts previously collected from utility customers for these deferred taxes being refundable to those customers, generally through reductions in future rates. The TCJA includes provisions related to the IRS normalization rules that address the time period in which certain plant-related components of the excess deferred taxes are to be reflected in customer rates. This time period for the Ameren Companies is approximately 30 to 60 years. Other components of the excess deferred taxes will be reflected in customer rates as determined by our state and federal regulators, which could
be a shorter time period than that applicable to certain plant-related components. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters for information regarding the various proceedings for the TCJA impacts with our regulators.
Missouri Income Tax Rate
In 2018, legislation modifying Missouri tax law was enacted to decrease the state's corporate income tax rate from 6.25% to 4%, effective January 1, 2020. As a result, in 2018, Ameren’s and Ameren Missouri’s accumulated deferred tax balances were revalued, resulting in a net decrease of $122 million to their accumulated deferred tax liability, which was offset by a regulatory liability. Additionally, Ameren recorded an immaterial amount to income tax expense.
As a result of its PISA election under Missouri Senate Bill 564, which prohibits a change in electric base rates prior to April 2020, Ameren Missouri anticipates that the effect of this tax decrease will be reflected in customer rates upon completion of its next regulatory rate review. Ameren (parent) and nonregistrant subsidiaries do not expect this income tax decrease to have a material impact on net income.
Illinois Income Tax Rate
In July 2017, Illinois enacted a law that increased the state’s corporate income tax rate from 7.75% to 9.5% as of July 1, 2017. The law made the increase in the state’s corporate income tax rate permanent. That rate was previously scheduled to go to 7.3%
in 2025. In 2017, Ameren recorded an expense of $14 million at Ameren (parent) due to the revaluation of accumulated deferred taxes and the estimated state apportionment of such taxes. Beyond this expense, Ameren and Ameren Illinois do not expect this tax increase to have a material impact on their net income prospectively. The tax increase is not expected to materially affect the earnings of the Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, the Ameren Transmission, or the Ameren Illinois Transmission segments, since these businesses operate under formula ratemaking frameworks. The tax increase unfavorably affected the 2017 net income of the Ameren Illinois Natural Gas segment by less than $1 million. In addition, in 2017, Ameren’s and Ameren Illinois’ accumulated deferred tax balances were revalued using the state’s new corporate income tax rate, which resulted in a net increase to
the liability balances of $97 million and $79 million, respectively. These increased liabilities were offset by a regulatory asset, as well as income tax expense, as discussed above.
The following table presents the principal reasons for the difference between the effective income tax rate and the federal statutory corporate income tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
Ameren Missouri
Ameren Illinois
Ameren
2018
Federal
statutory corporate income tax rate:
21
%
21
%
21
%
Increases (decreases) from:
Amortization
of excess deferred taxes
(4
)
(4
)
(4
)
Other depreciation differences
—
(1
)
—
Amortization
of deferred investment tax credit
(1
)
—
(1
)
State tax
4
7
6
TCJA
1
1
1
Tax
credits
(1
)
—
—
Other permanent items
—
—
(1
)
Effective
income tax rate
20
%
24
%
22
%
2017
Federal
statutory corporate income tax rate:
35
%
35
%
35
%
Increases (decreases) from:
Depreciation
differences
1
(1
)
—
Amortization of deferred investment tax credit
(1
)
—
(1
)
State
tax
4
6
6
TCJA
6
(1
)
14
Tax
credits
(1
)
—
—
Other permanent items
—
(1
)
(2
)
Effective
income tax rate
44
%
38
%
52
%
2016
Federal
statutory corporate income tax rate:
35
%
35
%
35
%
Increases (decreases) from:
Depreciation
differences
1
—
—
Amortization of deferred investment tax credit
(1
)
—
—
State
tax
3
5
4
Stock-based compensation(a)
—
—
(2
)
Valuation
allowance
—
—
1
Other permanent items
—
(2
)
(1
)
Effective
income tax rate
38
%
38
%
37
%
(a)
Reflects the adoption of authoritative accounting guidance related to stock-based compensation, which resulted in the recognition of a $21 million
income tax benefit in 2016.
The following table presents the components of income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
Ameren Missouri
Ameren Illinois
Other
Ameren
2018
Current
taxes:
Federal
$
104
$
4
$
(118
)
$
(10
)
State
29
6
(12
)
23
Deferred
taxes:
Federal
22
75
123
220
State
(2
)
28
23
49
Amortization
of excess deferred taxes
(24
)
(15
)
(1
)
(40
)
Amortization of deferred investment tax credits
(5
)
—
—
(5
)
Total
income tax expense
$
124
$
98
$
15
$
237
2017
Current
taxes:
Federal
$
149
$
(34
)
$
(110
)
$
5
State
23
29
(20
)
32
Deferred
taxes:
Federal
76
185
250
511
State
11
(13
)
36
34
Amortization
of deferred investment tax credits
(5
)
(1
)
—
(6
)
Total income tax expense
$
254
$
166
$
156
$
576
2016
Current
taxes:
Federal
$
31
$
(8
)
$
(24
)
$
(1
)
State
6
12
(21
)
(3
)
Deferred
taxes:
Federal
161
117
21
299
State
23
37
32
92
Amortization
of deferred investment tax credits
(5
)
—
—
(5
)
Total income tax expense
$
216
$
158
$
8
$
382
The
following table presents the accumulated deferred income tax assets and liabilities recorded as a result of temporary differences at December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Ameren Missouri
Ameren Illinois
Other
Ameren
2018
Accumulated
deferred income taxes, net liability (asset):
Plant-related
$
2,010
$
1,345
$
179
$
3,534
Regulatory
assets and liabilities, net
(343
)
(221
)
(25
)
(589
)
Deferred employee benefit costs
(58
)
(4
)
(64
)
(126
)
Tax
carryforwards
(35
)
(26
)
(166
)
(227
)
Other
(40
)
25
46
31
Total
net accumulated deferred income tax liabilities (assets)
$
1,534
$
1,119
$
(30
)
$
2,623
2017
Accumulated
deferred income taxes, net liability (asset):
Plant-related
$
2,064
$
1,264
$
146
$
3,474
Regulatory
assets and liabilities, net
(317
)
(206
)
(24
)
(547
)
Deferred employee benefit costs
(53
)
(17
)
(61
)
(131
)
Revenue
requirement reconciliation adjustments
—
20
—
20
Tax carryforwards
(31
)
(43
)
(287
)
(361
)
Other
(13
)
3
61
51
Total
net accumulated deferred income tax liabilities (assets)
The following table presents the components of accumulated deferred income tax assets relating to net operating loss carryforwards, tax credit carryforwards, and charitable contribution carryforwards at December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Ameren
Missouri
Ameren Illinois
Other
Ameren
2018
Net
operating loss carryforwards:
Federal(a)
$
—
$
23
$
55
$
78
State(a)
—
—
13
13
Total
net operating loss carryforwards
$
—
$
23
$
68
$
91
Tax
credit carryforwards:
Federal(b)
$
35
$
3
$
79
$
117
State(c)
—
—
10
10
Total
tax credit carryforwards
$
35
$
3
$
89
$
127
Charitable
contribution carryforwards(d)
$
—
$
—
$
14
$
14
Valuation
allowance(e)
—
—
(5
)
(5
)
Total charitable contribution carryforwards
$
—
$
—
$
9
$
9
2017
Net
operating loss carryforwards:
Federal
$
—
$
41
$
162
$
203
State
—
—
32
32
Total
net operating loss carryforwards
$
—
$
41
$
194
$
235
Tax
credit carryforwards:
Federal
$
31
$
2
$
80
$
113
State
—
—
7
7
Total
tax credit carryforwards
$
31
$
2
$
87
$
120
Charitable
contribution carryforwards
$
—
$
—
$
11
$
11
Valuation
allowance
—
—
(5
)
(5
)
Total charitable contribution carryforwards
$
—
$
—
$
6
$
6
(a)
Will
expire between 2034 and 2037. Any net operating loss carryforward generated after January 1, 2018, will not have an expiration date as a result of the TCJA.
(b)
Will expire between 2029 and 2037.
(c)
Will expire between 2019 and
2022.
(d)
Will expire between 2019 and 2023.
(e)
See Schedule II under Part IV, Item 15, in this report for information on changes in the valuation allowance.
Uncertain Tax Positions
As of December 31, 2018
and 2017, the Ameren Companies did not record any uncertain tax positions.
The Internal Revenue Service is currently examining Ameren’s 2018 and 2017 income tax returns. State income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of three years after filing. The state impact of any federal changes remains subject to examination by various states for up to one year after formal notification to the states. The Ameren Companies currently do not have material income tax issues under examination, administrative appeals, or litigation.
Ameren Missouri has an uncertain tax position tracker. Under Missouri’s regulatory framework, uncertain tax positions do not reduce Ameren Missouri’s electric
rate base. When an uncertain income tax position liability is resolved, the MoPSC requires, through the uncertain tax position tracker, the creation of a regulatory asset or regulatory liability to reflect the time value, using the weighted-average cost of capital included in each of the electric rate orders in effect before the tax position was resolved, of the difference between the uncertain tax position liability that was excluded from rate base and the final tax liability. The resulting regulatory asset or liability will affect earnings in the year it is created. It will then be amortized over three years, beginning on the effective date of new rates established in the next electric regulatory rate review.
NOTE 13 – RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In the normal
course of business, Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois have engaged in, and may in the future engage in, affiliate transactions. These transactions primarily consist of natural gas and power purchases and sales, services received or rendered, and borrowings and lendings. Transactions between Ameren’s subsidiaries are reported as affiliate transactions on their individual financial statements, but those transactions are eliminated in consolidation for Ameren’s consolidated financial statements. Below are the material related-party agreements.
Ameren Illinois must acquire capacity
and energy sufficient to meet its obligations to customers. Ameren Illinois uses periodic RFP processes, administered by the IPA and approved by the ICC, to contract capacity and energy on behalf of its customers. Ameren Missouri participates in the RFP process and has been a winning supplier for certain periods.
Capacity Supply Agreements
In a procurement event in 2015, Ameren Missouri contracted to supply a portion of Ameren Illinois’ capacity requirements for $15 million for the 12 months ending May 31, 2017.
Energy Swaps and Energy Products
Based on the outcome of IPA-administered procurement events, Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois have entered into energy product agreements by which Ameren
Missouri agreed to sell, and Ameren Illinois agreed to purchase, a set amount of megawatthours at a predetermined price over a specified period of time. The following table presents the specified performance period, price, and amount of megawatthours included in the agreements:
IPA Procurement Event
Performance Period
MWh
Average Price per MWh
May 2014
January
2015 – February 2017
168,400
$
51
April 2015
June 2015 – June 2017
667,000
36
September 2015
November 2015 – May 2018
339,000
38
April
2016
June 2017 – September 2018
375,200
35
September 2016
May 2017 – September 2018
82,800
34
April 2017
March 2019 – May
2020
85,600
34
April 2018
June 2019 – September 2020
110,000
32
Collateral Postings
Under the terms of the Illinois energy product agreements entered into through RFP processes administered by the IPA, suppliers must post collateral under certain market conditions to protect Ameren Illinois
in the event of nonperformance. The collateral postings are unilateral, which means that only the suppliers can be required to post collateral. Therefore, Ameren Missouri, as a winning supplier in the RFP process, may be required to post collateral. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, there were no collateral postings required of Ameren Missouri related to the Illinois energy product agreements.
Interconnection and Transmission Agreements
Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois are parties to an interconnection agreement for the use of their respective transmission lines and other facilities for the distribution of power. These agreements have no contractual expiration date, but may be terminated by
either party with three years’ notice.
Support Services Agreements
Ameren Services provides support services to its affiliates. The costs of support services, including wages, employee benefits, professional services, and other expenses, are based on, or are an allocation of, actual costs incurred. The support services agreement can be terminated at any time by the mutual agreement of Ameren Services and that affiliate or by either party with 60 days’ notice before the end of a calendar year.
In addition, Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois provide affiliates with access to their facilities for administrative purposes and with use of other assets. The costs of the rent and facility services and other assets are based on, or are an allocation of, actual costs incurred.
Separately, Ameren Missouri
and Ameren Illinois provide storm-related and miscellaneous support services to each other on an as-needed basis.
Transmission Services
Ameren Illinois receives transmission services from ATXI for its retail load in the AMIL pricing zone.
Electric Transmission Maintenance and Construction Agreements
ATXI entered into separate agreements with Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois in which Ameren Missouri or Ameren Illinois, as applicable, may perform certain maintenance and construction services related to ATXI’s electric transmission
assets. The Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois agreements are effective from August 2017 through June 2019 and from August 2018 through July 2019, respectively.
Money Pool
See Note 4 – Short-term Debt and Liquidity for a discussion of affiliate borrowing arrangements.
Tax Allocation Agreement
See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for a discussion of the tax allocation agreement. The following table presents the affiliate balances related to income taxes for Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:
2018
2017
Ameren
Missouri
Ameren Illinois
Ameren Missouri
Ameren Illinois
Income taxes payable to parent(a)
$
16
$
7
$
11
$
17
Income
taxes receivable from parent(b)
—
6
—
—
(a)
Included
in “Accounts payable – affiliates” on the balance sheet.
(b)
Included in “Accounts receivable – affiliates” on the balance sheet.
Capital Contributions
The following table presents cash capital contributions received from Ameren (parent) by Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
2018
2017
2016
Ameren
Missouri(a)
$
45
$
30
$
44
(b)
Ameren Illinois
160
8
—
(a)
As
a result of the tax allocation agreement.
(b)
Included a $38 million accrued capital contribution from 2015.
The following table presents the impact on Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois of related-party transactions for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,
and 2016. It is based primarily on the agreements discussed above and the money pool arrangements discussed in Note 4 – Short-term Debt and Liquidity.
Agreement
Income Statement Line Item
Ameren
Missouri
Ameren
Illinois
Ameren
Missouri power supply agreements
Operating Revenues
2018
$
11
$
(a)
with Ameren Illinois
2017
23
(a)
2016
28
(a)
Ameren
Missouri and Ameren Illinois
Operating Revenues
2018
22
3
rent and facility services
2017
26
4
2016
25
5
Ameren
Missouri and Ameren Illinois miscellaneous
Operating Revenues
2018
1
1
support services and services provided to ATXI
2017
(b)
1
2016
1
(b)
Total
Operating Revenues
2018
$
34
$
4
2017
49
5
2016
54
5
Ameren
Illinois power supply
Purchased Power
2018
$
(a)
$
11
agreements with Ameren Missouri
2017
(a)
23
2016
(a)
28
Ameren
Illinois transmission
Purchased Power
2018
(a)
1
services from ATXI
2017
(a)
2
2016
(a)
2
Total
Purchased Power
2018
$
(a)
$
12
2017
(a)
25
2016
(a)
30
Ameren
Missouri and Ameren Illinois
Other Operations and
2018
$
3
$
6
rent and facility services
Maintenance
2017
(b)
(b)
2016
(b)
(b)
Ameren
Services support services
Other Operations and
2018
136
126
agreement
Maintenance
2017
149
139
2016
129
123
Total
Other Operations and
2018
$
139
$
132
Maintenance Expenses
2017
149
139
2016
129
123
Money
pool borrowings (advances)
(Interest Charges)
2018
$
1
$
(b)
Other Income, Net
2017
1
(b)
2016
(b)
(b)
(a)
Not
applicable.
(b)
Amount less than $1 million.
NOTE 14 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We are involved in legal, tax, and regulatory proceedings before various courts, regulatory commissions, authorities, and governmental agencies with respect to matters that arise in the ordinary course of business, some of which involve substantial amounts of money. We believe that the final disposition of these proceedings, except as otherwise disclosed in these notes to our financial statements, will not have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.
See also Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters, Note 9 – Callaway Energy Center, and Note 13 – Related-party Transactions in this report.
We lease various facilities, office equipment, plant equipment, and rail cars under capital and operating leases. The following table presents our lease obligations at December 31, 2018:
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
After 5 Years
Total
Ameren:
Minimum
capital lease payments(a)(b)
$
32
$
32
$
33
$
32
$
264
$
—
$
393
Less
amount representing interest
25
25
25
24
24
—
123
Present
value of minimum capital lease payments
$
7
$
7
$
8
$
8
$
240
$
—
$
270
Operating
leases
10
8
7
6
5
9
45
Total
lease obligations
$
17
$
15
$
15
$
14
$
245
$
9
$
315
Ameren
Missouri:
Minimum
capital lease payments(b)(c)
$
32
$
32
$
33
$
32
$
264
$
—
$
393
Less
amount representing interest
25
25
25
24
24
—
123
Present
value of minimum capital lease payments
$
7
$
7
$
8
$
8
$
240
$
—
$
270
Operating
leases
8
7
6
5
5
9
40
Total
lease obligations
$
15
$
14
$
14
$
13
$
245
$
9
$
310
Ameren
Illinois:
Operating
leases
$
1
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
1
(a)
See
Note 3 – Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net for additional information.
(b)
See Note 5 – Long-term Debt and Equity Financings for additional information on Ameren’s and Ameren Missouri’s capital lease agreements.
The following table presents total operating lease expenses included in “Operating Expenses” in the statement of income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
To supply a portion of the fuel requirements of Ameren Missouri’s energy centers, Ameren Missouri has entered into various long-term commitments for the procurement of coal, natural gas, nuclear fuel, and methane gas. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois also have entered into various long-term commitments for purchased power and natural gas for distribution. The table below presents our estimated minimum fuel, purchased power, and other commitments at December 31, 2018. Ameren’s and Ameren Illinois’ purchased power commitments include the Ameren Illinois agreements entered into as part of the IPA-administered power procurement process. Included in the Other column are minimum purchase commitments under contracts for equipment, design
and construction, and meter reading services, among other agreements, at December 31, 2018.
Coal
Natural
Gas(a)
Nuclear
Fuel
Purchased
Power(b)(c)
Methane
Gas
Other
Total
Ameren:
2019
$
349
$
197
$
25
$
157
$
4
$
67
$
799
2020
160
143
43
54
4
41
445
2021
121
77
59
10
4
30
301
2022
72
27
14
—
3
26
142
2023
—
7
42
—
3
27
79
Thereafter
—
34
31
—
29
72
166
Total
$
702
$
485
$
214
$
221
$
47
$
263
$
1,932
Ameren
Missouri:
2019
$
349
$
40
$
25
$
—
$
4
$
49
$
467
2020
160
31
43
—
4
26
264
2021
121
15
59
—
4
26
225
2022
72
5
14
—
3
26
120
2023
—
3
42
—
3
27
75
Thereafter
—
14
31
—
29
56
130
Total
$
702
$
108
$
214
$
—
$
47
$
210
$
1,281
Ameren
Illinois:
2019
$
—
$
157
$
—
$
157
$
—
$
8
$
322
2020
—
112
—
54
—
5
171
2021
—
62
—
10
—
—
72
2022
—
22
—
—
—
—
22
2023
—
4
—
—
—
—
4
Thereafter
—
20
—
—
—
—
20
Total
$
—
$
377
$
—
$
221
$
—
$
13
$
611
(a)
Includes
amounts for generation and for distribution.
(b)
The purchased power amounts for Ameren and Ameren Illinois exclude agreements for renewable energy credits through 2034 with various renewable energy suppliers due to the contingent nature of the payment amounts.
(c)
The purchased power amounts for Ameren and Ameren Missouri exclude a 102-megawatt power purchase agreement with a wind farm operator, which expires in 2024, due to the contingent nature of the payment amounts.
In
January 2018, as required by the FEJA, Ameren Illinois entered into 10-year agreements to acquire zero emission credits. Annual zero emission credit commitment amounts will be published by the IPA each May prior to the start of the subsequent planning year. The amounts above reflect Ameren Illinois’ commitment to acquire approximately $26 million of zero emission credits through May 2019.
Environmental Matters
We are subject to various environmental laws, including statutes and regulations, enforced by federal, state, and local authorities. The development and operation of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities and natural gas storage, transmission, and distribution facilities can trigger compliance obligations with respect to environmental laws. These laws address emissions, discharges to water, water intake, impacts
to air, land, and water, and chemical and waste handling. Complex and lengthy processes are required to obtain and renew approvals, permits, and licenses for new, existing or modified facilities. Additionally, the use and handling of various chemicals or hazardous materials require release prevention plans and emergency response procedures.
The EPA has promulgated environmental regulations that have a significant impact on the electric utility industry. Over time, compliance with these regulations could be costly for Ameren Missouri, which operates coal-fired power plants. As of December 31, 2018, Ameren Missouri’s fossil fuel-fired energy centers represented 16% and 32% of Ameren’s and Ameren Missouri’s rate base, respectively. Regulations that apply to air emissions from the electric
utility industry include the NSPS, the CSAPR, the MATS, and the National Ambient Air Quality Standards, which are subject to periodic review for certain pollutants. Collectively, these regulations cover a variety of pollutants, such as
SO2, particulate matter, NOx,mercury, toxic metals, and acid gases, and CO2 emissions from new power plants. Water intake and discharges from power plants
are regulated under the Clean Water Act. Such regulation could require modifications to water intake structures or more stringent limitations on wastewater discharges at Ameren Missouri’s energy centers, either of which could result in significant capital expenditures. The management and disposal of coal ash is regulated under the CCR rule, which will require the closure of surface impoundments and the installations of dry ash handling systems at several of Ameren Missouri’s energy centers. The individual or combined effects of existing environmental regulations could result in significant capital expenditures, increased operating costs, or the closure or alteration of operations at some of Ameren Missouri’s energy centers. Ameren and Ameren Missouri expect that such compliance costs would be recoverable through rates, subject to MoPSC prudence review, but the timing of costs and their recovery could be subject to regulatory
lag.
Ameren and Ameren Missouri estimate that they will need to make capital expenditures of $300 million to $400 million from 2019 through 2023 in order to comply with existing environmental regulations. Additional environmental controls beyond 2023 could be required. This estimate of capital expenditures includes expenditures required by the CCR regulations, by the Clean Water Act rule applicable to cooling water intake structures at existing power plants, and by effluent limitation guidelines applicable to steam electric generating units, all of which are discussed below. Ameren Missouri’s current plan for compliance with existing air emission regulations includes burning ultra-low-sulfur coal and
installing new or optimizing existing pollution control equipment. The actual amount of capital expenditures required to comply with existing environmental regulations may vary substantially from the above estimate because of uncertainty as to whether the EPA will substantially revise regulatory obligations, exactly which compliance strategies will be used and their ultimate cost, among other things.
The following sections describe the more significant environmental laws and rules and environmental enforcement and remediation matters that affect or could affect our operations. The EPA has initiated an administrative review of several regulations and proposed amendments to regulations and guidelines, including to the effluent limitation guidelines and the CCR Rule, which could ultimately result in the revision of all or part of such rules.
Clean Air Act
Federal
and state laws, including CSAPR, regulate emissions of SO2 and NOx through emission source reductions and the use and retirement of emission allowances. The first phase of the CSAPR emission reduction requirements became effective in 2015. The second phase of emission reduction requirements, which were revised by the EPA in 2016, became effective in 2017; additional emission reduction requirements may apply in subsequent years. To achieve compliance with the CSAPR, Ameren Missouri burns ultra-low-sulfur coal, operates two scrubbers at its Sioux energy center, and optimizes other existing pollution control equipment. Ameren Missouri expects to incur additional costs to lower its emissions at one or more of its energy centers to comply with the CSAPR in future years. These higher costs are
expected to be recovered from customers through the FAC or higher base rates.
CO2 Emissions Standards
In 2015, the EPA issued the Clean Power Plan, which would have established CO2 emissions standards applicable to existing power plants. The United States Supreme Court stayed the rule in February 2016, pending various legal challenges. In August 2018, the EPA proposed to repeal and replace the Clean Power Plan with a proposed new rule known as the Affordable Clean Energy Rule, which establishes emission guidelines for states to follow in developing plans to limit CO2 emissions from power plants. The EPA proposes to use certain efficiency measures as the best system of emission
reduction for coal-fired power plants. The EPA is expected to finalize the Affordable Clean Energy rule in the first half of 2019. We cannot predict the outcome of EPA’s rulemaking or the outcome of legal challenges related to such rulemaking.
NSR and Clean Air Litigation
In January 2011, the Department of Justice, on behalf of the EPA, filed a complaint against Ameren Missouri in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. The complaint, as amended in October 2013, alleged that in performing projects at its Rush Island coal-fired energy center in 2007 and 2010, Ameren Missouri violated provisions of the Clean Air Act and Missouri law. The litigation has been divided into two phases: liability and remedy. In the first phase, in January 2017, the district court issued a liability ruling that the projects violated provisions of the
Clean Air Act and Missouri law. In the second phase, the district court will determine the actions required to remedy the violations found in the liability phase. The EPA previously withdrew all claims for penalties and fines. Hearings on remedy-related issues are scheduled for April 2019. At the conclusion of both phases of the litigation, Ameren Missouri intends to appeal the liability ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
The ultimate resolution of this matter could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial position, and liquidity of Ameren and Ameren Missouri. Among other things and subject to economic and regulatory considerations, resolution of this matter could result in increased capital expenditures for the installation of pollution control equipment, as well as increased operations and maintenance expenses. We
are unable to predict the ultimate resolution of this matter or the costs that might be incurred.
In July 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the EPA’s Section 316(b) Rule applicable to cooling water intake structures at existing power plants. The rule requires a case-by-case evaluation and plan for reducing aquatic organisms impinged on a power plant’s cooling water intake screens or entrained through the plant’s cooling water system. All of Ameren Missouri’s coal-fired and nuclear energy centers are subject to the cooling water intake structures rule. The rule
will be implemented by Ameren Missouri during the permit renewal process of each energy center’s water discharge permit, which is expected to be completed by 2023.
In 2015, the EPA issued a rule to revise the effluent limitation guidelines applicable to steam electric generating units. These guidelines established national standards for water discharges that are based on the effectiveness of available control technology. The EPA’s 2015 rule prohibits effluent discharges of certain waste streams and imposes more stringent limitations on certain water discharges from power plants. In September 2017, the EPA published a rule that postponed the compliance dates by two years for the limitations applicable to two specific waste streams so that it could potentially revise those standards. Ameren Missouri is in the process of constructing wastewater treatment facilities that meet the limitations in these guidelines at three of its
energy centers.
CCR Management
In 2015, the EPA issued the CCR rule, which established regulations regarding the management and disposal of CCR from coal-fired energy centers. These regulations affect CCR disposal and handling costs at Ameren Missouri’s energy centers. They require closure of impoundments if performance criteria relating to groundwater impacts and location restrictions are not achieved. In July 2018, the EPA issued revisions to the CCR rule that extended certain compliance deadlines and indicated that additional revisions to the CCR rule are likely. Ameren and Ameren Missouri have AROs of $135 million recorded on their respective balance sheets as of December 31, 2018, associated with CCR storage facilities that reflect the
regulations issued in 2015. Ameren plans to close these CCR storage facilities between 2019 and 2023. The recent EPA revisions do not affect Ameren Missouri’s closure schedule. Ameren Missouri estimates it will need to make capital expenditures of $150 million to $200 million from 2019 through 2023 to implement its CCR management compliance plan, which includes installation of dry ash handling systems, waste water treatment facilities, and groundwater monitoring equipment.
Remediation
The Ameren Companies are involved in a number of remediation actions to clean up sites impacted by the use or disposal of materials containing hazardous substances. Federal
and state laws can require responsible parties to fund remediation regardless of their degree of fault, the legality of original disposal, or the ownership of a disposal site. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois have each been identified by federal or state governments as a potentially responsible party at several contaminated sites.
As of December 31, 2018, Ameren Illinois had investigated and remediated the majority of the 44 former MGP sites in Illinois it owned or for which it was otherwise responsible. Ameren Illinois estimates it could substantially conclude remediation efforts at its remaining sites by 2023. The ICC allows Ameren Illinois to recover such remediation and related litigation costs from its electric and natural gas utility customers through environmental cost riders.
Costs are subject to annual prudence review by the ICC. As of December 31, 2018, Ameren Illinois estimated the obligation related to these former MGP sites at $150 million to $212 million. Ameren and Ameren Illinois recorded a liability of $150 million to represent the estimated minimum obligation for these sites, as no other amount within the range was a better estimate.
The scope of the remediation activities at these former MGP sites may increase as remediation efforts continue. Considerable uncertainty remains in these estimates because many site-specific factors can influence the ultimate actual costs, including unanticipated underground structures, the degree to which groundwater is encountered,
regulatory changes, local ordinances, and site accessibility. The actual costs and timing of completion may vary substantially from these estimates.
Ameren Missouri participated in the investigation of various sites known as Sauget Area 2, located in Sauget, Illinois. In December 2018, Ameren Missouri signed a consent decree with the EPA to implement certain remedial measures at one of the disposal sites and reached an agreement with Solutia, Inc., the primary potentially responsible party for the Sauget Area 2, limiting Ameren Missouri’s cleanup obligations with respect to the other disposal sites. Remediation efforts at the site are expected to occur in 2020. As of December 31, 2018, Ameren Missouri recorded a liability of $1 million to represent its estimated minimum obligation for
this site.
Our operations or those of our predecessor companies involve the use of, disposal of, and in appropriate circumstances, the cleanup of substances regulated under environmental laws. We are unable to determine whether such practices will result in future environmental commitments or will affect our results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.
NOTE 15 – SEGMENT INFORMATION
Ameren has four segments: Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Transmission. The Ameren Missouri segment includes all of the operations of Ameren Missouri. Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution consists
of the electric distribution business of Ameren Illinois. Ameren Illinois Natural Gas consists of the natural gas business of Ameren Illinois. Ameren Transmission primarily consists of the aggregated electric transmission businesses of Ameren Illinois and ATXI. The category called Other primarily includes Ameren (parent) activities and Ameren Services.
Ameren Missouri has one segment. Ameren Illinois has three segments:
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Illinois Transmission. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional information regarding the operations of Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois, and ATXI.
Segment operating revenues and a majority of operating expenses are directly recognized and incurred by Ameren Illinois to each Ameren Illinois segment. Common operating expenses, miscellaneous income and expenses, interest charges, and income tax expense are allocated by Ameren Illinois to each Ameren Illinois segment based on certain factors, which primarily relate to the nature of the cost. Additionally, Ameren Illinois Transmission earns revenue from transmission service provided to Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, other retail electric suppliers, and wholesale customers. The transmission expense for Illinois customers
who have elected to purchase their power from Ameren Illinois is recovered through a cost recovery mechanism with no net effect on Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution earnings, as costs are offset by corresponding revenues. Transmission revenues from these transactions are reflected in Ameren Transmission’s and Ameren Illinois Transmission’s operating revenues. An intersegment elimination at Ameren and Ameren Illinois occurs to eliminate these transmission revenues and expenses.
The following tables present information about the reported revenue and specified items reflected in net income attributable to common shareholders and
capital expenditures by segment at Ameren and Ameren Illinois for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016. Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois management review segment capital expenditure information rather than any individual or total asset amount.
Ameren
Ameren
Missouri
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution
Ameren Illinois Natural Gas
Ameren Transmission
Other
Intersegment
Eliminations
Ameren
2018
External
revenues
$
3,555
$
1,544
$
814
$
378
$
—
$
—
$
6,291
Intersegment
revenues
34
3
1
55
(a)
—
(93
)
—
Depreciation
and amortization
550
259
65
77
4
—
955
Interest
income
28
6
—
—
4
(5
)
33
Interest
charges
200
73
38
75
(b)
19
(4
)
401
Income
taxes
124
41
25
56
(9
)
—
237
Net
income (loss) attributable to Ameren common shareholders
478
136
70
164
(33
)
—
815
Capital
expenditures
914
503
311
562
5
(9
)
2,286
2017
External
revenues
$
3,488
$
1,564
$
742
$
382
$
(2
)
$
—
$
6,174
Intersegment
revenues
49
4
1
44
(a)
—
(98
)
—
Depreciation
and amortization
533
239
59
60
5
—
896
Interest
income
27
7
—
—
11
(11
)
34
Interest
charges
207
73
36
67
(b)
19
(11
)
391
Income
taxes
254
83
36
90
113
—
576
Net
income (loss) attributable to Ameren common shareholders
323
131
60
140
(131
)
—
523
Capital
expenditures
773
476
245
644
1
(7
)
2,132
2016
External
revenues
$
3,470
$
1,544
$
753
$
309
$
—
$
—
$
6,076
Intersegment
revenues
54
4
1
46
(a)
—
(105
)
—
Depreciation
and amortization
514
226
55
43
7
—
845
Interest
income
28
11
—
1
11
(11
)
40
Interest
charges
211
72
34
58
(b)
18
(11
)
382
Income
taxes
216
78
39
74
(25
)
—
382
Net
income (loss) attributable to Ameren common shareholders
357
126
59
117
(6
)
—
653
Capital
expenditures
738
470
181
689
4
(6
)
2,076
(a)
Ameren
Transmission earns revenue from transmission service provided to Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution. See discussion of transactions above.
(b)
Ameren Transmission interest charges include an allocation of financing costs from Ameren (parent).
Ameren
Illinois Transmission earns revenue from transmission service provided to Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution. See discussion of transactions above.
The following tables present disaggregated revenues by segment at Ameren and Ameren Illinois for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016. Economic factors affect the nature, timing, amount, and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows in a similar manner across customer classes. Revenues from alternative
revenue programs have a similar distribution among customer classes as revenues from contracts with customers. Other revenues not associated with contracts with customers are presented in the Other customer classification, along with electric transmission and off-system revenues.
Ameren
Ameren
Missouri
Ameren
Illinois Electric Distribution
Ameren Illinois Natural Gas
Ameren Transmission
Other
Intersegment
Eliminations
Ameren
2018
Residential
$
1,560
$
867
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
2,427
Commercial
1,271
511
—
—
—
—
1,782
Industrial
312
130
—
—
—
—
442
Other
308
(a)
39
—
433
—
(92
)
688
(a)
Total
electric revenues
$
3,451
$
1,547
$
—
$
433
$
—
$
(92
)
$
5,339
Residential
$
90
$
—
$
581
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
671
Commercial
37
—
159
—
—
—
196
Industrial
4
—
17
—
—
—
21
Other
7
—
58
—
—
(1
)
64
Total
gas revenues
$
138
$
—
$
815
$
—
$
—
$
(1
)
$
952
Total
revenues(b)
$
3,589
$
1,547
$
815
$
433
$
—
$
(93
)
$
6,291
2017
Residential
$
1,417
$
870
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
2,287
Commercial
1,208
527
—
—
—
—
1,735
Industrial
305
113
—
—
—
—
418
Other
481
58
—
426
(2
)
(96
)
867
Total
electric revenues
$
3,411
$
1,568
$
—
$
426
$
(2
)
$
(96
)
$
5,307
Residential
$
77
$
—
$
531
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
608
Commercial
31
—
146
—
—
—
177
Industrial
4
—
12
—
—
—
16
Other
14
—
54
—
—
(2
)
66
Total
gas revenues
$
126
$
—
$
743
$
—
$
—
$
(2
)
$
867
Total
revenues(b)
$
3,537
$
1,568
$
743
$
426
$
(2
)
$
(98
)
$
6,174
2016
Residential
$
1,422
$
895
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
2,317
Commercial
1,224
517
—
—
—
—
1,741
Industrial
315
96
—
—
—
—
411
Other
435
40
—
355
1
(104
)
727
Total
electric revenues
$
3,396
$
1,548
$
—
$
355
$
1
$
(104
)
$
5,196
Residential
$
77
$
—
$
530
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
607
Commercial
30
—
153
—
—
—
183
Industrial
4
—
10
—
—
—
14
Other
17
—
61
—
—
(2
)
76
Total
gas revenues
$
128
$
—
$
754
$
—
$
—
$
(2
)
$
880
Total
revenues(b)
$
3,524
$
1,548
$
754
$
355
$
1
$
(106
)
$
6,076
(a)
Includes
$60 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, for the reduction to revenue for the excess amounts collected in rates related to the TCJA from January 1, 2018, through July 31, 2018. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters for additional information.
The
following table presents increases/(decreases) in revenues from alternative revenue programs and other revenues not from contracts with customers for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
Ameren
Missouri
Ameren
Illinois Electric Distribution
Ameren Illinois Natural Gas
Ameren Transmission
Ameren
2018
Revenues
from alternative revenue programs
$
(8
)
$
(3
)
$
(23
)
$
(25
)
$
(59
)
Other
revenues not from contracts with customers
24
16
2
—
42
2017
Revenues
from alternative revenue programs
$
(28
)
$
(5
)
$
5
$
13
$
(15
)
Other
revenues not from contracts with customers
15
6
2
—
23
2016
Revenues
from alternative revenue programs
$
8
$
(70
)
$
11
$
(1
)
$
(52
)
Other
revenues not from contracts with customers
16
6
2
—
24
Ameren
Illinois
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution
Ameren Illinois Natural Gas
Ameren
Illinois Transmission
Intersegment Eliminations
Ameren Illinois
2018
Residential
$
867
$
581
$
—
$
—
$
1,448
Commercial
511
159
—
—
670
Industrial
130
17
—
—
147
Other
39
58
267
(53
)
311
Total
revenues(a)
$
1,547
$
815
$
267
$
(53
)
$
2,576
2017
Residential
$
870
$
531
$
—
$
—
$
1,401
Commercial
527
146
—
—
673
Industrial
113
12
—
—
125
Other
58
54
258
(42
)
328
Total
revenues(a)
$
1,568
$
743
$
258
$
(42
)
$
2,527
2016
Residential
$
895
$
530
$
—
$
—
$
1,425
Commercial
517
153
—
—
670
Industrial
96
10
—
—
106
Other
40
61
232
(45
)
288
Total
revenues(a)
$
1,548
$
754
$
232
$
(45
)
$
2,489
(a)
The
following table presents increases/(decreases) in revenues from alternative revenue programs and other revenues not from contracts with customers for the Ameren Illinois segments for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
SELECTED QUARTERLY INFORMATION (Unaudited) (In millions, except per share amounts)
Ameren
2018
2017
Quarter
ended
March 31
June 30
September 30
December 31
March 31
June 30
September
30
December 31
Operating revenues(a)
$
1,585
$
1,563
$
1,724
$
1,419
$
1,515
$
1,537
$
1,723
$
1,399
Operating
income(a)
273
385
533
166
242
387
569
212
Net
income (loss)
153
240
359
69
104
194
290
(59
)
(b)
Net
income (loss) attributable to Ameren common shareholders
$
151
$
239
$
357
$
68
$
102
$
193
$
288
$
(60
)
Earnings
(loss) per common share – basic
$
0.62
$
0.98
$
1.46
$
0.28
$
0.42
$
0.79
$
1.19
$
(0.24
)
Earnings
(loss) per common share – diluted(c)
$
0.62
$
0.97
$
1.45
$
0.28
$
0.42
$
0.79
$
1.18
$
(0.24
)
(a)
2017
amounts have been revised to reflect the adoption of accounting guidance on revenue from contracts with customers and the presentation of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit cost, effective for the Ameren Companies as of January 1, 2018. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 10 – Retirement Benefits under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional information.
(b)
Includes an increase to income tax expense of $154 million recorded in 2017 as a result of the TCJA.
(c)
The
sum of quarterly amounts, including per share amounts, may not equal amounts reported for year-to-date periods. This is because of the effects of rounding and the changes in the number of weighted-average diluted shares outstanding each period.
2017
amounts have been revised to reflect the adoption of accounting guidance on revenue from contracts with customers and the presentation of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit cost, effective for the Ameren Companies as of January 1, 2018. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 10 – Retirement Benefits under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional information.
(b)
Includes an increase to income tax expense of $32 million recorded in 2017 as a result of the TCJA.
2017
amounts have been revised to reflect the adoption of accounting guidance on revenue from contracts with customers and the presentation of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit cost, effective for the Ameren Companies as of January 1, 2018. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 10 – Retirement Benefits under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional information.
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM
9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of December 31, 2018, evaluations were performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer of each of the Ameren Companies, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of such registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based on those evaluations, as of December 31, 2018, the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer of each of the Ameren Companies concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide assurance that information required to be disclosed in such registrant’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to its management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b)
Management’s
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, an evaluation was conducted of the effectiveness of each of the Ameren Companies’ internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). After making that evaluation, management concluded that each of the Ameren Companies’ internal control over financial
reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018. The effectiveness of Ameren’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report herein under Part II, Item 8. This annual report does not include an attestation report of Ameren Missouri’s or Ameren Illinois’ (the Subsidiary Registrants) independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report for each of the Subsidiary Registrants is not subject to attestation by an independent registered public accounting firm.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness into future periods are subject to the risk that internal controls might become inadequate because of changes in conditions, and to the risk that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures might deteriorate.
(c)
Change in Internal Control
There has been no change in the Ameren Companies’ internal control over financial reporting during their most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, their internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM
9B.
OTHER INFORMATION
The Ameren Companies have no information reportable under this item that was required to be disclosed in a report on SEC Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of 2018 that has not previously been reported on an SEC Form 8-K.
PART III
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information required by
Items 401, 405, 406 and 407(c)(3),(d)(4) and (d)(5) of SEC Regulation S-K for Ameren will be included in its definitive proxy statement for its 2019 annual meeting of shareholders filed pursuant to SEC Regulation 14A; it is incorporated herein by reference. Information required by these SEC Regulation S-K items for Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois will be included in each company’s definitive information statement for its 2019 annual meeting of shareholders filed pursuant to SEC Regulation 14C; it is incorporated herein by reference. Specifically, reference is made to the following sections of Ameren’s definitive proxy statement and to each of Ameren Missouri’s and Ameren Illinois’ definitive information statements: “Information Concerning Nominees to the Board of Directors,”“Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,”“Corporate Governance” and “Board Structure.”
Information concerning executive officers of the Ameren Companies required by Item 401 of SEC Regulation S-K is reported under a separate caption entitled “Executive Officers of the Registrants” in Part I of this report.
Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois do not have separately designated standing audit committees, but instead use Ameren’s audit and risk committee to perform such committee functions for their boards of directors. These companies do not have securities listed on the NYSE and therefore are not subject to the NYSE listing standards. Walter J. Galvin serves as chairman of Ameren’s audit and risk committee and Catherine S. Brune, J. Edward Coleman, Ward H. Dickson, Noelle K. Eder, and Craig S. Ivey serve as members. The board of directors
of Ameren has determined that Walter J. Galvin, J. Edward Coleman, and Ward H. Dickson each qualify as an audit committee financial expert and that each is “independent” as that term is used in SEC Regulation 14A.
Also, on the same basis as reported above, the boards of directors of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois use the nominating and corporate governance committee of Ameren’s board of directors to perform such committee functions. This committee is responsible for the nomination of directors and for corporate governance practices. Ameren’s nominating and corporate governance committee will consider
director
nominations from shareholders in accordance with its Policy Regarding Nominations of Directors, which can be found on Ameren’s website: www.ameren.com.
To encourage ethical conduct in its financial management and reporting, Ameren has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the principal executive officer, the president, the principal financial officer, the principal accounting officer, the controller, and the treasurer of each of the Ameren Companies. Ameren has also adopted a code of business conduct that applies to the directors, officers, and employees of the Ameren Companies. It is referred to as the Principles of Business Conduct. The Ameren Companies make available free of charge through Ameren’s website (www.ameren.com)
the Code of Ethics and the Principles of Business Conduct. Any amendment to the Code of Ethics or the Principles of Business Conduct and any waiver from a provision of the Code of Ethics or the Principles of Business Conduct as it relates to the principal executive officer, the president, the principal financial officer, the principal accounting officer, the controller, or the treasurer of each of the Ameren Companies will be posted on Ameren’s website within four business days following the date of the amendment or waiver.
ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information required by Items 402 and 407(e)(4) and (e)(5) of SEC Regulation
S-K for Ameren will be included in its definitive proxy statement for its 2019 annual meeting of shareholders filed pursuant to SEC Regulation 14A; it is incorporated herein by reference. Information required by these SEC Regulation S-K items for Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois will be included in each company’s definitive information statement for its 2019 annual meeting of shareholders filed pursuant to SEC Regulation 14C; it is incorporated herein by reference. Specifically, reference is made to the following sections of Ameren’s definitive proxy statement and to each of Ameren Missouri’s and Ameren Illinois’ definitive information statements: “Executive Compensation Matters” and “Human Resources Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.”
ITEM
12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table presents information as of December 31, 2018, with respect to the shares of Ameren’s common stock that may be issued under its existing equity compensation plans:
Plan
Category
Column
A
Number of Securities To Be
Issued Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights(a)
Column B
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
Column C
Number of Securities Remaining
Available for Future Issuance
Equity Compensation
Plans (excluding
securities reflected in Column A)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(b)
1,650,565
(c)
3,772,209
Equity compensation
plans not approved by security holders
—
—
—
Total
1,650,565
(c)
3,772,209
(a)
Pursuant
to grants of performance share units (PSUs) and restricted stock units (RSUs) under the 2014 Incentive Plan, 1,393,223 of the securities represent the target number of PSUs granted but not vested and 187,314 of the securities represent the number of RSUs granted but not vested (including accrued and reinvested dividends) as of December 31, 2018 (including outstanding awards under the 2014 Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2018). The actual number of shares issued in respect of the PSUs will vary from 0% to 200% of the target level, depending upon the achievement of total shareholder return objectives established for such awards. For additional information about the PSUs and RSUs, including payout calculations, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Long-Term Incentive Compensation” in Ameren’s definitive proxy statement for its 2019 annual meeting of shareholders,
which will be filed pursuant to SEC Regulation 14A. Also, 70,028 of the securities represent shares that may be issued as of December 31, 2018, to satisfy obligations under the Ameren Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for members of the board of directors.
(b)
Consists of the 2014 Incentive Plan.
(c)
No consideration is received when shares are distributed for earned PSUs, RSUs, and director awards. Accordingly, there is no weighted-average exercise price.
Ameren
Missouri and Ameren Illinois do not have separate equity compensation plans.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The information required by Item 403 of SEC Regulation S-K for Ameren will be included in its definitive proxy statement for its 2019 annual meeting of shareholders filed pursuant to SEC Regulation 14A; it is incorporated herein by reference. Information required by this SEC Regulation S-K item for Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois will be included in each company’s definitive information statement for its 2019 annual meeting of shareholders filed pursuant to SEC Regulation 14C; it is incorporated herein by reference. Specifically, reference is made to the following section of Ameren’s definitive proxy statement and each of Ameren Missouri’s and
Ameren Illinois’ definitive information statement: “Security Ownership.”
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information required by Items 404 and 407(a) of SEC Regulation S-K for Ameren will be included in its definitive proxy statement for its 2019 annual
meeting of shareholders filed pursuant to SEC Regulation 14A; it is incorporated herein by reference. Information required by these SEC Regulation S-K items for Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois will be included in each company’s definitive information statement for its 2019 annual meeting of shareholders filed pursuant to SEC Regulation 14C; it is incorporated herein by reference. Specifically, reference is made to the following sections of Ameren’s definitive proxy statement and to each of Ameren Missouri’s and Ameren Illinois’ definitive information statements: “Related Person Transaction Policy” and “Director Independence.”
ITEM
14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Information required by Item 9(e) of SEC Schedule 14A for the Ameren Companies will be included in the definitive proxy statement of Ameren and the definitive information statements of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois for their 2019 annual meetings of shareholders filed pursuant to SEC Regulations 14A and 14C, respectively; it is incorporated herein by reference. Specifically, reference is made to the following section of Ameren’s definitive proxy statement and each of Ameren Missouri’s and Ameren Illinois’ definitive information statement: “Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”
Schedule I and II should be read in conjunction with the aforementioned financial statements. Certain schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or because the required data is shown in the aforementioned financial statements.
SCHEDULE
I – CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF PARENT AMEREN CORPORATION CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016
(In millions)
2018
2017
2016
Operating revenues
$
—
$
—
$
—
Operating
expenses
11
15
19
Operating loss
(11
)
(15
)
(19
)
Equity
in earnings of subsidiaries
857
659
663
Interest income from affiliates
3
9
10
Total
other income (expense), net
(12
)
2
—
Interest charges
34
31
28
Income
tax (benefit)
(12
)
101
(27
)
Net Income Attributable to Ameren Common Shareholders
$
815
$
523
$
653
Net
Income Attributable to Ameren Common Shareholders
$
815
$
523
$
653
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Taxes:
Pension
and other postretirement benefit plan activity, net of income taxes (benefit) of $(1), $3, and $(7), respectively
(4
)
5
(20
)
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Ameren Common Shareholders
SCHEDULE
I – CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF PARENT AMEREN CORPORATION CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016
(In millions)
2018
2017
2016
Net cash flows provided by operating activities
$
550
$
454
$
483
Cash
flows from investing activities:
Money pool advances, net
(63
)
14
(27
)
Notes
receivable – ATXI, net
—
275
(60
)
Investments in subsidiaries
(208
)
(151
)
(123
)
Other
5
6
2
Net
cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities
(266
)
144
(208
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Dividends
on common stock
(451
)
(431
)
(416
)
Short-term debt, net
87
(124
)
206
Money
pool borrowings, net
18
(5
)
19
Issuances of common stock
74
—
—
Repurchases
of common stock for stock-based compensation
—
(24
)
(51
)
Employee payroll taxes related to stock-based compensation
(19
)
(15
)
(32
)
Net
cash flows used in financing activities
(291
)
(599
)
(274
)
Net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
$
(7
)
$
(1
)
$
1
Cash,
cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of year
8
9
8
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of year
$
1
$
8
$
9
Cash
dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries
$
450
$
362
$
465
Noncash
financing activity – Issuance of common stock for stock-based compensation
Ameren Corporation (parent company only) is a public utility holding company that conducts substantially all of its business operations through its subsidiaries. Ameren Corporation (parent company only) has accounted for its subsidiaries using the equity method. These financial statements are presented on a condensed basis.
See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional information. See Note 13 – Related-party Transactions under Part II, Item 8, of this
report for information on the tax allocation agreement between Ameren Corporation (parent company only) and its subsidiaries.
NOTE 2 – CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within the balance sheet as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:
2018
2017
Cash
and cash equivalents
$
—
$
—
Restricted cash included in “Other current assets”
1
8
Total
cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
$
1
$
8
See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional information.
NOTE 3 – SHORT-TERM DEBT AND LIQUIDITY
Ameren, Ameren Services, and other non-state-regulated Ameren subsidiaries have the ability, subject to Ameren parent company and applicable regulatory
short-term borrowing authorizations, to access funding from the Credit Agreements and the commercial paper programs through a non-state-regulated subsidiary money pool agreement. All participants may borrow from or lend to the non-state-regulated money
pool. The total amount available to pool participants from the non-state-regulated subsidiary money pool at any given time is reduced by the amount of borrowings made by participants, but is increased to the extent that the pool participants advance surplus funds to the non-state-regulated subsidiary money pool or remit funds from other external sources. The non-state-regulated subsidiary money pool was
established to coordinate and to provide short-term cash and working capital for the participants. Participants receiving a loan under the non-state-regulated subsidiary money pool agreement must repay the principal amount of such loan, together with accrued interest. The rate of interest depends on the composition of internal and external funds in the non-state-regulated subsidiary money pool. Interest revenues and interest charges related to non-state-regulated money pool advances and borrowings were immaterial in 2016, 2017, and 2018.
Ameren Corporation (parent company only) had a total of $11 million in guarantees outstanding, primarily for ATXI, that were not recorded on its December 31,
2018 balance sheet. The ATXI guarantees were issued to local governments as assurance for potential remediation of damage caused by ATXI construction.
See Note 4 – Short-term Debt and Liquidity under Part II, Item 8, of this report for a description and details of short-term debt and liquidity needs of Ameren Corporation (parent company only).
NOTE 4 – LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS
See Note 5 – Long-term Debt and Equity Financings under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional information on Ameren Corporation’s (parent company only) long-term debt, indenture provisions, and restricted cash balance.
NOTE 5 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
See
Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item 8, of this report for a description of all material contingencies of Ameren Corporation (parent company only).
NOTE 6 – OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET
The following table presents the components of “Other Income (Expense), Net” in the Condensed Statement of Income and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
2018
2017
2016
Other
Income (Expense), Net
Non-service cost components of net periodic benefit income
$
2
$
2
$
5
Donations
(13
)
—
(5
)
Other
expense, net
(1
)
—
—
Total Other Income (Expense), Net
$
(12
)
$
2
$
—
Based
on authoritative accounting guidance described in Note 10 - Retirement Benefits under Part II, Item 8, of this report, Ameren Corporation (parent company only) has retrospectively reclassified $2 million and $5 million of net benefit income from “Operating Expenses” to “Other Income (Expense), Net” in the Condensed Statement of Income and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively.
NOTE 7 – INCOME TAXES
During the year ended December 31, 2017,
Ameren (parent) recorded $110 million in income tax expense and reduction in accumulated deferred income taxes as a result of the TCJA. During the year ended December 31, 2018, Ameren (parent) updated its provisional estimate and recorded $5 million of income tax expense and reduction in accumulated deferred income taxes, primarily due to the application of proposed IRS regulations on depreciation transition rules.
SCHEDULE
II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016
(in millions)
Column
A
Column B
Column C
Column D
Column E
Description
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
(1)
Charged to Costs
and Expenses
(2)
Charged to Other
Accounts(a)
Deductions(b)
Balance at End
of
Period
Ameren:
Deducted from assets – allowance for doubtful accounts:
2018
$
19
$
27
$
4
$
32
$
18
2017
19
26
7
33
19
2016
19
32
3
35
19
Deferred
tax valuation allowance:
2018
$
5
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
5
2017
11
(6
)
(c)
—
—
5
2016
6
7
(2
)
—
11
Ameren
Missouri:
Deducted from assets – allowance for doubtful accounts:
2018
$
7
$
9
$
—
$
9
$
7
2017
7
9
—
9
7
2016
7
10
—
10
7
Ameren
Illinois:
Deducted from assets – allowance for doubtful accounts:
2018
$
12
$
18
$
4
$
23
$
11
2017
12
17
7
24
12
2016
12
22
3
25
12
(a)
Amounts
associated with the allowance for doubtful accounts relate to the uncollectible account reserve associated with receivables purchased by Ameren Illinois from alternative retail electric suppliers, as required by the Illinois Public Utilities Act. The amounts relating to the deferred tax valuation allowance are for items that have expired and were removed from both the underlying accumulated deferred income tax account as well as the offsetting valuation account.
(b)
Uncollectible accounts charged off, less recoveries.
(c)
Includes
an adjustment of $3 million to Ameren (parent)’s valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets existing at December 31, 2017, for the reduction in the income tax rate.
ITEM 16.
FORM 10-K SUMMARY
The Ameren Companies elected not to provide a summary of the Form 10-K.
The documents listed below are being filed or have previously been filed on behalf of the Ameren Companies and are incorporated herein by reference from the documents indicated and made a part hereof. Exhibits not identified as previously filed are filed herewith:
Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated June 15, 1937 (Ameren Missouri Mortgage), from Ameren Missouri to The Bank of New York Mellon, as successor trustee, as amended May 1, 1941, and Second Supplemental Indenture dated May 1, 1941
Loan Agreement, dated as of December 1, 1992, between the Missouri
Environmental Authority and Ameren Missouri, together with Indenture of Trust dated as of December 1, 1992, between the Missouri Environmental Authority and UMB Bank, N.A. as successor trustee to Mercantile Bank of St. Louis, N.A.
Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust between Ameren Illinois (successor in interest to Central Illinois Light Company and Illinois Power Company) and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (formerly Bankers Trust Company), as trustee, dated as of April 1, 1933 (CILCO Mortgage), Supplemental Indenture between the same parties dated as of June 30, 1933, Supplemental Indenture between CILCO (predecessor in interest to Ameren Illinois) and the trustee, dated as of July 1, 1933, Supplemental Indenture between the same parties dated as of January 1, 1935, and Supplemental Indenture between the same parties dated as of April 1, 1940
Exhibit B-1, Registration No. 2-1937; Exhibit B-1(a), Registration No. 2-2093; and Exhibit A, April 1940 Form 8-K, File No. 1-2732
General Mortgage Indenture and Deed of Trust, dated as of November 1, 1992 between Ameren Illinois (successor in interest to Illinois Power Company) and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as successor trustee (Ameren Illinois Mortgage)
The
file number references for the Ameren Companies’ filings with the SEC are: Ameren, 1-14756; Ameren Missouri, 1-2967; and Ameren Illinois, 1-3672.
*Compensatory plan or arrangement.
Each registrant hereby undertakes to furnish to the SEC upon request a copy of any long-term debt instrument not listed above that such registrant has not filed as an exhibit pursuant to the exemption provided by Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. The signatures for each undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company or its subsidiaries.
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.