Document/Exhibit Description Pages Size
1: 10-K Form 10-K for Year Ended December 31, 1997 86 481K
2: EX-4.O Supplemental Indenture No. 1 - Dated 3/5/97 13 39K
3: EX-4.P Supplemental Indenture No. 2 - Dated 3/5/97 13 40K
4: EX-10.D Letter Agreement 14 46K
5: EX-10.E Employment Agreement - James E. Barnes 14 46K
6: EX-10.F Employment Agreement - Robert G. Sachse 14 47K
7: EX-10.G Employment Agreement - Philip W. Baxter 14 47K
8: EX-10.H Non-Competition Agreement Dated November 23, 1997 8 27K
9: EX-10.I Non-Competition Agreement - James E. Barnes 8 28K
10: EX-10.J Non-Competition Agreement - Robert G. Sachse 8 28K
11: EX-10.K Non-Competition Agreement - Phillip W. Baxter 8 28K
12: EX-12 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges 1 8K
13: EX-21 List of Subsidiaries 2 13K
14: EX-23 Independent Auditors Consent 1 8K
15: EX-27 Financial Data Schedule 1 10K
================================================================================
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
---------------------
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED]
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-5254
---------------------
MAPCO INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
[Download Table]
DELAWARE 73-0705739
(State or other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.)
1800 SOUTH BALTIMORE AVENUE, TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74119
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (918) 581-1800
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
[Download Table]
NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE
TITLE OF EACH CLASS ON WHICH REGISTERED
------------------- ---------------------
Common Stock, $1.00 Par value New York Stock Exchange
Pacific Exchange
Chicago Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS
REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS (OR FOR SUCH SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE
REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO FILE SUCH REPORTS), AND (2) HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH
FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS. YES [X] NO [ ]
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK IF DISCLOSURE OF DELINQUENT FILERS PURSUANT TO ITEM
405 OF REGULATION S-K (SEC.229.405 OF THIS CHAPTER) IS NOT CONTAINED HEREIN, AND
WILL NOT BE CONTAINED, TO THE BEST OF REGISTRANT'S KNOWLEDGE, IN DEFINITIVE
PROXY OR INFORMATION STATEMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN PART III OF THIS
FORM 10-K OR ANY AMENDMENT TO THIS FORM 10-K. [ ]
The aggregate market value of MAPCO Inc.'s ("MAPCO") voting stock held by
non-affiliates of MAPCO, based on the last sale price of MAPCO Common Stock on
the New York Stock Exchange on February 20, 1998 was $3,086,148,513.00. On that
date, 55,832,614 shares of MAPCO Common Stock were outstanding, of which
54,801,519 shares were held by non-affiliates.
================================================================================
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
[Download Table]
PAGE
----
Item 1. Business.................................................... 1
BUSINESS OF MAPCO........................................... 1
NATURAL GAS LIQUIDS......................................... 2
PROPANE MARKETING........................................... 6
PETROLEUM REFINING.......................................... 8
RETAIL PETROLEUM............................................ 10
OTHER BUSINESSES............................................ 11
EMPLOYEES................................................... 12
Item 2. Properties.................................................. 12
Item 3. Legal Proceedings........................................... 12
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders......... 13
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters......................................... 13
Item 6. Selected Financial Data..................................... 14
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations................................... 16
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data................. 32
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure.................................... 32
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.......... 32
Item 11. Executive Compensation...................................... 35
PENSION PLAN................................................ 39
EMPLOYMENT CONTINUATION AGREEMENTS.......................... 40
COMPENSATION OF THE BOARD................................... 42
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management.................................................. 42
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.............. 44
TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS..................... 44
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form
8-K......................................................... 45
SIGNATURES............................................................ 49
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT................................ F-1
SCHEDULE I -- CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF
REGISTRANT.................................................. S-1
(i)
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
BUSINESS OF MAPCO
MAPCO Inc. ("MAPCO" or the "Company") is a diversified energy company
which, through separate business units, is engaged in the transportation by
pipeline of natural gas liquids ("NGLs"), anhydrous ammonia, crude oil and
refined petroleum products; the transportation by truck and rail of NGLs and
refined petroleum products; the refining of crude oil; the marketing of NGLs,
refined petroleum products and crude oil; the trading of crude oil, refined
petroleum products and NGLs; NGL storage; and the marketing of motor fuel and
merchandise through convenience store operations. MAPCO was incorporated in
Delaware in 1958 and has its principal executive offices in Tulsa, Oklahoma. For
convenience of reference and simplification of this report, references herein to
MAPCO or the Company include its subsidiaries or affiliates, unless the context
requires otherwise.
On November 24, 1997, the Company announced that it had entered into an
agreement and plan of merger, as amended as of January 25, 1998 (the "Merger
Agreement"), with The Williams Companies, Inc. ("Williams") under which MAPCO
will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Williams (the "Williams Merger"). Under
the Merger Agreement, each share of MAPCO common stock and associated preferred
stock purchase rights outstanding prior to the Williams Merger will be exchanged
for 1.665 shares of Williams common stock and .555 associated preferred stock
purchase rights (after giving effect to Williams two-for-one stock split on
December 29, 1997) upon consummation of the Williams Merger. The proposed
Williams Merger will be completed only if a number of conditions are met or
waived, including obtaining (i) the approval of the stockholders of Williams and
MAPCO and (ii) receipt of necessary governmental approvals. Consummation of the
proposed Williams Merger is expected in the first quarter of 1998. Reference is
made to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus of MAPCO and Williams dated January
27, 1998 for a complete description of the Merger Agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby.
In connection with the Williams Merger, also in November 1997, the Company
amended its Rights Agreement under which the Company has a one-half Right
outstanding for each outstanding share of MAPCO common stock as described in
Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report. This amendment
will effectively prevent the Rights from becoming exercisable as a result of the
Williams Merger and the consummation of the other transactions contemplated by
the Merger Agreement and provides that all outstanding Rights will expire
immediately prior to the effective time of the Williams Merger.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF THE
PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
The Company may have included certain forward-looking statements in this
Report and includes this provision pursuant to the "safe harbor" provisions of
the Private Securities Reform Act of 1995. Whenever, in this Report, the Company
or its management express an expectation or belief as to future results or
future events, while made in good faith and with a reasonable basis based on
information currently available to the Company's management, there is no
assurance that the statement of expectation or belief will be achieved or
accomplished. Various risk factors could cause actual results and events to vary
significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statement.
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve
risks, uncertainties and assumptions. The future results and stockholder value
of MAPCO may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking
statements. Many of the factors that will determine these results and values are
beyond MAPCO's ability to control or predict. Stockholders are cautioned not to
put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.
Stockholders of the Company should understand that the following important
factors, in addition to those discussed elsewhere in this Report, could affect
the future results of the Company, and could cause results to differ materially
from those expressed in such forward-looking statements: (i) the effect of
economic
conditions and interest rates on a national, regional or international basis;
(ii) the financial resources of, and products available to, competitors; (iii)
changes in laws and regulations, including changes in accounting standards; (iv)
changes in the securities markets; (v) the timing of the implementation of
changes in operations to effect cost savings; (vi) opportunities that may be
presented to and pursued by Williams following the Merger; (vii) completion of
construction projects within cost and timing plans; and (viii) the capacity of
constructed assets to function as designed. In addition, future utilization of
pipeline capacity will depend on energy prices, competition from other pipelines
and alternate fuels, the general level of natural gas and petroleum product
demand and weather conditions, among other things. Further, gas prices which
directly impact transportation and gathering and processing throughput and
operating profits may fluctuate in unpredictable ways.
BUSINESS UNIT INFORMATION
MAPCO's business is divided into the following business unit reporting
structures:
[Enlarge/Download Table]
BUSINESS UNIT BUSINESS ACTIVITY INCLUDED WITHIN BUSINESS UNIT
------------- -----------------------------------------------
Natural Gas Liquids............ Liquid Petroleum Gas ("LPG") Distribution, NGL Trading,
Pipeline Operations, Fractionation and Underground Storage.
Propane Marketing.............. Wholesale and Retail Marketing of Propane and Appliances.
Petroleum Refining............. Refining, Wholesale Marketing and Crude and Refined Products
Trading.
Retail Petroleum............... Retail Marketing and Convenience Store Operations.
Other.......................... Mobile Information Systems and Bundled Services for
Commercial Fleets.
Financial information about MAPCO's continuing business units for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997 is set forth in Note 14 to
the consolidated financial statements on page F-22 and Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations on page 16.
NATURAL GAS LIQUIDS
GENERAL
The Natural Gas Liquids business unit operations include the transportation
and sale of NGLs as well as pipeline transportation of anhydrous ammonia,
refined petroleum products and crude oil. The NGL business unit operations also
include fractionation and underground storage systems. The 1997 Natural Gas
Liquids revenues were $750.6 million and operating profit was $183.6 million
compared to $716.4 million of revenues and $137.1 million of operating profit in
1996. Operating profit in 1997 includes a $66.0 million gain on the sale of
MAPCO's interest in the West Panhandle field.
NGL PROCESSING AND TRADING
MAPCO owns a 50% interest in and operates a 107,000 barrel per day
fractionator at Conway, Kansas. This fractionator receives mixed NGLs from the
gathering areas in the Overthrust Belt area of Wyoming and Utah, New Mexico,
west Texas, western Oklahoma, Colorado and Kansas for separation into
ethane-propane mix, propane, normal butane, iso-butane and natural gasoline.
After separation, the products are moved principally to markets in the Midwest
and on the Texas Gulf Coast through MAPCO's Mid-America and Seminole pipeline
systems.
MAPCO buys, sells and exchanges domestic and imported NGLs in the Midwest,
Gulf Coast and Rocky Mountain regions. MAPCO purchases all of its NGLs from
outside sources and sales are made under both short and long-term arrangements.
NGL sales and purchases for 1997 averaged 77,947 barrels per day compared
with 73,696 barrels per day in 1996. The supply of and demand for NGLs can
materially affect the volume of product available to MAPCO and also the market
for such product.
2
MID-AMERICA PIPELINE
Mid-America Pipeline Company ("Mid-America"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of
MAPCO Natural Gas Liquids Inc., owns and operates 7,668 miles of pipeline and
related pumping, metering and storage facilities. The main system consists of
7,636 miles of pipeline; the remaining 32 miles is the portion of the pipeline
which runs from near Collierville, Tennessee to MAPCO's Refinery in Memphis,
Tennessee.
The Mid-America pipeline system transports NGLs which consist of the
following: propane used as fuel and petrochemical feedstock; butane and natural
gasoline used as refinery and petrochemical feedstock; ethane-propane mixtures
and ethylene used as petrochemical feedstock; and mixed NGLs for further
fractionation. The pipeline system consists of 7,636 miles of pipe varying in
diameter from two to twelve inches. The main line of this pipeline system runs
from the Wyoming-Utah Overthrust Belt area through the northwestern New Mexico
portion of the Four Corners area to near Hobbs, New Mexico, and from Hobbs to
Conway, Kansas, where it branches into east and west legs. The west leg extends
to near Minneapolis, Minnesota, and the east leg leads to near Janesville,
Wisconsin. Spurs from these legs extend into southeast Kansas, Iowa and
Illinois.
Mid-America also transports crude oil from St. James, Louisiana to Memphis,
Tennessee. This crude oil is transported in pipeline space leased by Mid-America
in the Capline Pipeline system which extends from St. James to near
Collierville, Tennessee. Crude oil is then transported through a 45-mile
pipeline, operated and partially owned (32 miles only) by Mid-America to MAPCO
Petroleum's Memphis Refinery. In order to increase throughput of crude to the
Company's Memphis Refinery, the pipeline was looped in the Fall of 1996. This
process increased the length of the line by 13 miles. Effective January 1, 1996,
the Mid-America space on the Capline System was leased by the Petroleum Refining
business unit.
SEMINOLE PIPELINE
Seminole Pipeline Company ("Seminole") owns 1,311 miles of pipeline,
predominantly fourteen inches in diameter, extending from Hobbs Station in west
Texas to the Mont Belvieu Terminal on the Texas Gulf Coast, together with
related pumping, metering and storage facilities. MAPCO owns 80% of the stock of
Seminole and operates and manages the pipeline.
Seminole operates as a batch system moving demethanized mix, ethane-propane
mix and specification liquid products. Products are received from gas processing
plants and from Mid-America for delivery to various destinations along the
pipeline system. The Texas Gulf Coast market served by Seminole is predominantly
for petrochemical and refining feedstock.
See "Legal Proceedings" Item 3 beginning on page 12 for information
concerning litigation proceedings connected with Seminole.
MAPCO AMMONIA PIPELINE
MAPCO Ammonia Pipeline (the "Ammonia System") transports liquid anhydrous
ammonia for use as fertilizer. This system consists of 1,093 miles of pipeline
varying from four to eight inches in diameter. It receives ammonia from plants
in the Texas Panhandle and near Enid and Tulsa, Oklahoma for delivery to points
principally in Kansas, Nebraska, Iowa and southern Minnesota. The Ammonia System
is owned by the Company and is operated by Mid-America.
RIO GRANDE PIPELINE
In November 1995, Juarez Pipeline Company (a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Mid-America), Amoco Rio Grande Pipeline Company and Navajo Southern Inc. formed
a partnership under the name Rio Grande Pipeline Company ("Rio Grande"). Rio
Grande transports NGLs from Mid-America's Hobbs Station in Texas and other
Mid-America origins to the Pemex Gas y Petroquimica Basica ("Pemex") Mendez
terminal in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico through a 244 mile, 8-inch pipeline. The
Mexican customer purchasing the NGLs is PMI Trading Company. The partnership
pipeline connects with the Mid-America NGL system through an 8-inch line
purchased from Navajo Pipeline Company running from west of Odessa, Texas to
near El Paso,
3
Texas. Construction of a new 8-inch pipeline connecting the 8-inch Navajo line
to the Pemex terminal in Ciudad Juarez and additional facilities at the Pemex
terminal to efficiently receive incoming shipments was completed in 1997. Rio
Grande is operated by Mid-America (under contract with Rio Grande) and first
shipments on the new pipeline system began in March 1997.
DISCOVERY PRODUCER SERVICES
In February 1997, MAPCO Energy L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
wholly-owned by MAPCO ("MAPCO Energy"), formed a joint venture with Texaco
Exploration and Production Inc. ("Texaco") under the names Discovery Producer
Services, LLC and Discovery Gas Transmission LLC ("Discovery"), which owns and
operates the Discovery Project. Discovery has constructed a 150-mile pipeline
varying in diameter from 12 inches to 30 inches to transport natural gas from
offshore discovery wells in the Gulf of Mexico to gas processing and
fractionation facilities in southern Louisiana. First shipments on the new
pipeline began in December 1997. The joint venture is also constructing a
cryogenic gas processing plant with a capacity of approximately 600 million
cubic feet of gas per day near Larose, Louisiana, and will expand a natural gas
liquids fractionator in Paradis, Louisiana. The project's gas processing plant
and fractionator are both expected to be fully operational by July 1998. MAPCO
Energy and Texaco each own 50% of the joint venture and a Texaco affiliate is
the operator. MAPCO Energy's net investment in the Discovery Project in 1997 was
$59.3 million, which included total expenditures of $126.7 million, net of $67.4
million of MAPCO Energy's share of the external financing secured by the joint
venture. Its investment in 1998 is expected to be $19.6 million, which will
include total expenditures of $53.5 million, net of $33.9 million of MAPCO
Energy's share of the joint venture's expected external financing.
ALLIANCE PIPELINE
On April 30, 1997, MAPCO purchased a 5% ownership in the Alliance pipeline
project. The Alliance pipeline will construct a 1,900 mile, 36-inch diameter,
natural gas pipeline transmission system to carry natural gas and natural gas
liquids from western Canada to the Midwest United States for marketing
throughout North America. Alliance's delivery points near Chicago include a
natural gas liquids extraction facility proposed by Aux Sable Liquids Products
LP, which is adjacent to the northern end of MAPCO's 10,000 mile NGL pipeline
network. Construction of the pipeline is expected to begin in the second quarter
of 1998 with completion anticipated by year-end 1999.
OTHER TRANSPORTATION AND DISTRIBUTION ARRANGEMENTS
On August 1, 1997, MAPCO announced that it had reached an understanding
with Enterprise Products Company ("Enterprise") to provide a groundwork for the
formation of a joint venture for the development of a natural gas liquids
transportation and distribution system. It is anticipated that this system will
be capable of distributing product from key NGL sources in southern Louisiana
with direct connections to major NGL markets, including the Louisiana river
markets, Lake Charles, Louisiana and Mont Belvieu, Texas. The parties executed a
Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") setting forth the principal terms being
considered with respect to proposed NGL opportunities. The MOU was scheduled to
expire of its own terms on December 31, 1997 but has been extended to March 31,
1998.
4
LIQUID MOVEMENTS
The following table summarizes the Mid-America, Ammonia and Seminole
Systems' total movements of liquids in millions of barrel miles (barrels of
liquids times number of miles transported) and revenue per 100 barrel miles for
each of the past five years:
[Enlarge/Download Table]
BARREL MILES (IN MILLIONS)
AND REVENUE PER 100 BARREL MILES
-----------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Natural Gas Liquids.................. 140,391 133,122 108,476 109,854 95,568
Anhydrous Ammonia.................... 3,777 3,610 3,505 3,851 3,587
Crude Oil and Refined Products....... 771 894* 4,787 5,215 4,971
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total...................... 144,939 137,626 116,768 118,920 104,126
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Revenue Per 100 Barrel Miles......... 18.3c 19.2c 18.8c 18.7c 19.2c
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
---------------
* Effective January 1, 1996, space previously leased by the NGL business unit on
the Capline System was leased by the Petroleum Refining business unit.
The Mid-America, Ammonia and Seminole Systems operate as common carriers.
The single largest shipper accounted for 20% of pipeline transportation revenues
during 1997. Total pipeline deliveries in 1997 were 289 million barrels,
compared with 288 million barrels in 1996.
LIQUIDS SUPPLY
The United States Department of Energy estimates of total proved reserves
of NGLs for Mid-America's and Seminole's source of supply areas in Texas, New
Mexico, Oklahoma, Kansas, Colorado, Wyoming and Utah are as follows:
[Download Table]
TOTAL INDUSTRY RESERVES
IN MILLIONS OF BARRELS
-----------------------
December 31, 1993........................................... 4,172
December 31, 1994........................................... 4,145
December 31, 1995........................................... 4,207
December 31, 1996........................................... 4,421
December 31, 1997........................................... not available
Mid-America's and Seminole's supply areas are also served by other
pipelines.
NGL PRODUCTION
During 1996, MAPCO Natural Gas Liquids Inc. ("MNGL") owned certain
liquefiable hydrocarbons in natural gas in the West Panhandle gas field of
Texas. The liquids produced in the field were moved through MNGL's Mid-America
and Seminole pipeline systems to Midwestern and Gulf Coast markets. MNGL's West
Panhandle field gas supplier had taken more than its percentage ownership share
of the field's production. The cumulative effect of this acceleration in gas
taken had resulted in the Westpan operations having a 31 billion cubic feet and
$30 million over-take position as of December 31, 1996. MAPCO sold all of its
interests in the West Panhandle field to Westpan NGL Co., a subsidiary of Mesa
Operating Company ("Mesa") effective January 1, 1997. In connection with the
sale, MAPCO was released from liability for its share of prior NGL "over-takes."
As part of the transaction, MAPCO has continued to purchase Mesa's liquids
produced from the field and will continue to transport the liquids on its
Mid-America Pipeline System.
UNDERGROUND STORAGE
Underground storage facilities for NGLs are owned or operated by MAPCO at
locations along its pipeline system in the states of Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska,
Oklahoma and Texas. The capacity of these facilities
5
at December 31, 1997, was approximately 19.3 million barrels. Other storage
operations compete with MAPCO for storage leasing in the Conway and Hutchinson,
Kansas areas.
COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS
The marketing of NGLs, the underground storage business and the
transportation businesses in which MAPCO operates are highly competitive. MAPCO
competes with a number of companies engaged in NGL marketing, some of which are
larger than MAPCO and may have more significant financial resources. In
addition, other pipelines, tank cars, trucks, barges and local sources of supply
(refineries, gasoline plants and ammonia plants) and other sources of energy
such as natural gas, coal, oil and electricity, all provide competition for
pipeline operations.
A portion of the Mid-America System transports propane, which is a seasonal
product due to its uses as residential and commercial heating fuel. The Ammonia
System is also sensitive to seasonal variations and provides more operating
profit to the Company during the spring and summer months when fertilizer use
reaches its peak in areas of the country supplied by this system.
REGULATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
The Natural Gas Liquids business unit is subject to various federal, state
and local environmental and safety laws and regulations. It is the policy of the
Natural Gas Liquids business unit to comply with such laws and regulations. At
this time, MAPCO cannot accurately predict the effect which such laws and
regulations may have on such activities and future earnings. Pipeline operations
are subject to the provisions of the Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Safety Act. In
addition, the tariff rates, shipping regulations and other practices of
Mid-America and Seminole are regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission pursuant to the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act applicable
to interstate common carrier petroleum and petroleum products pipelines. The
tariff rates and practices of the Ammonia System are regulated by the Surface
Transportation Board under the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission
Termination Act of 1995 applicable to pipeline carriers. Both of these statutes
require the filing of reasonable and nondiscriminatory tariff rates and subject
MAPCO to certain other regulations concerning its terms and conditions of
service.
The United States Department of Transportation has prescribed safety
regulations for common carrier pipelines. The pipeline systems are subject to
various state laws and regulations concerning safety standards, exercise of
eminent domain and similar matters. Mid-America and Seminole also file tariff
rates covering intrastate movements with various state commissions.
The Natural Gas Liquids business unit did not incur in 1997 and does not
anticipate to incur in 1998 any material capital expenditures for environmental
control facilities.
PROPANE MARKETING
The Propane Marketing business unit markets and distributes propane and
appliances on the wholesale and retail levels. Propane is used principally as a
fuel in various domestic, commercial, industrial, agricultural and vehicle motor
fuel applications. Residential customers, who account for the majority of sales,
use propane for home heating, cooking and other domestic purposes. The primary
agricultural use is crop drying. Commercial and industrial uses include fuel for
shopping centers and industrial plants.
Revenues in 1997 for the Propane Marketing business unit were $413.4
million, compared to $429.5 million in 1996. Propane Marketing's operating loss
in 1997 was $6.2 million compared to an operating profit of $65.0 million in
1996, which included a $20.8 million gain on the sale of propane and fertilizer
assets to CENEX, referred to below.
The retail marketing of propane and appliances is carried on under the
trade name "Thermogas" through 163 Company-owned and operated retail plants in
18 states in the upper Midwest and the Southeast regions of the United States.
Propane is also supplied to dealers operating in the same area, as well as to
wholesale outlets and industrial accounts. Wholesale appliances are sold through
a distributorship to customers in the
6
Midwest. Based upon published industry data, Thermogas is currently the fourth
largest retail propane marketer in the United States selling propane to more
than 350,000 customers. In 1997, MAPCO sold 297.2 million gallons of retail
propane compared to 331.4 million gallons in 1996.
Approximately 60% of the propane sold by MAPCO in 1997 was acquired from
outside sources. The largest outside propane supplier accounted for
approximately 25% of such outside purchases during 1997. MAPCO's propane supply
arrangements are standard for the industry with prices being subject to
adjustment in accordance with changes in industry-wide market price levels.
In March 1996, the Propane Marketing business unit sold its Iowa propane
and liquid fertilizer assets to CENEX Inc. ("CENEX"). The transaction, which was
completed on March 29, 1996, also involved the sale to CENEX of the remaining
Thermogas liquid fertilizer assets in Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota,
Ohio and Wisconsin. Sales and operating revenues for the assets involved in this
transaction were $24 million and $69 million in 1996 and 1995, respectively, and
operating profit was $2 million in 1996 and $7 million in 1995.
Effective January 1, 1997, the Propane Marketing business unit acquired the
assets and operations of Gas Supply, Inc., an independent wholesale propane
company based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, for approximately $7 million plus
working capital. The acquisition has been used to expand MAPCO's current
wholesale propane marketing activities under the name "Gas Supply." In 1997, Gas
Supply Inc. marketed approximately 194 million gallons of propane in the Central
and Northeastern United States compared to 107 million gallons in 1996. MAPCO
also acquired Gas Supply Inc.'s related product sales business, a construction
company, a 40,000-barrel storage facility and a rail car and truck terminal in
Rosemont, Minnesota.
During 1997, MAPCO acquired 19 propane companies at a cost of approximately
$38.5 million. These companies, with combined sales during 1996 of over 35.8
million gallons of propane and other related products, have market areas in
Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, Missouri, North
Carolina, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Wisconsin.
In September 1997, MAPCO launched a new company, Thermogas Energy, LLC,
whose purpose is to form joint ventures with rural electric cooperatives and
municipal utilities to market and distribute propane. As of December 31, 1997,
Thermogas Energy, LLC, had completed joint ventures with two rural cooperatives
in the state of Kentucky. Thermogas Energy, LLC is wholly-owned by Thermogas.
COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS
Both the wholesale and retail marketing of propane are highly competitive
businesses. Many of the Propane Marketing business unit's competitors are large
companies with significant financial resources which may be greater than that of
MAPCO. Other energy sources such as natural gas, coal, oil and electricity all
compete with propane for home heating, agricultural and commercial applications.
Propane competes particularly with natural gas in areas served by natural gas
distribution systems. The extension of natural gas service may result in the
future loss of existing customers.
The retail propane business is largely seasonal due to its primary uses for
home heating and crop drying. Accordingly, sales and operating profits are
concentrated in the fall and winter months. The Propane Marketing business unit
enjoys certain competitive advantages in its marketing areas due to name
recognition and by offering a wide array of competitive products and services.
REGULATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
The Propane Marketing business is not highly regulated or environmentally
sensitive; however, it is the policy of the Propane Marketing business unit to
comply with such laws and regulations as applicable. The Propane Marketing
business unit did not incur in 1997 and does not anticipate to incur in 1998 any
material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities.
7
PETROLEUM REFINING
GENERAL
The Petroleum Refining business unit operates two refining and marketing
systems: the Alaska System and the Mid-South System. The Alaska System includes
a Company-owned refinery which is situated on land leased from the state of
Alaska at North Pole, Alaska, a terminal facility at Anchorage, Alaska, which is
situated on land leased from the Alaska Railroad Corporation under two long-term
leases, and the wholesale marketing of refined petroleum products. The Mid-South
System includes a Company-owned refinery at Memphis, Tennessee and the wholesale
and spot marketing of refined petroleum products.
The 1997 Petroleum Refining business unit revenues were $2,308.4 million
and operating profit was $96.8 million compared to $1,813.4 million of revenues
and $63.9 million of operating profit in 1996.
ALASKA SYSTEM
MAPCO's refinery, located near Fairbanks at North Pole, Alaska (the "North
Pole Refinery"), is the largest refinery in the state. The refinery is owned by
MAPCO but is situated on land leased by MAPCO from the state of Alaska under a
long-term lease which is not scheduled to expire until 2025 and is renewable by
the Company at that time. The refinery is located approximately two miles from
its supply point for crude oil, the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System ("TAPS"). The
North Pole Refinery's processing capability is approximately 136,000 barrels per
day. At maximum crude throughput, 46,000 barrels per day of refined product can
be produced. These products are jet fuel, gasoline, diesel fuel, heating oil,
fuel oil, naphtha and asphalt. MAPCO markets more than 44,600 barrels per day of
these refined products to Alaska, Western Canada and the Pacific Rim. MAPCO's
principal market for these products in Alaska is to wholesale, commercial,
industrial and governmental customers and to MAPCO's Retail Petroleum business
unit operations. MAPCO's Retail Petroleum business unit operations, as described
below, accounted for about 10% of the North Pole Refinery's 1997 product sales
volume and 76% of the Refinery's gasoline production. In 1997, average
throughput at the North Pole Refinery was 132,238 barrels per day of crude oil
which resulted in the average production of 44,524 barrels per day of petroleum
products compared to 132,912 barrels per day of average crude throughput and
average production of 45,599 barrels per day of petroleum products in 1996.
MAPCO is in the process of constructing a third crude unit at the North Pole
Refinery that will produce an additional 17,000 barrels per day of refined
products, including 14,000 barrels per day of jet fuel. The project is expected
to be completed in the fourth quarter of 1998 at an estimated cost of $70
million.
The North Pole Refinery's crude oil is purchased from the state of Alaska
or is purchased or received on exchanges from crude oil producers. The North
Pole Refinery has an agreement with the state of Alaska for the purchase of
royalty oil which is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2003. The agreement
provides for the purchase of up to 35,000 barrels per day (approximately 27% of
the North Pole Refinery's supply) of the State's royalty share of crude oil
produced from Prudhoe Bay, Alaska. These volumes, along with crude oil either
purchased from crude oil producers or received under exchange agreements, are
utilized as throughput in the production of products at the Refinery.
Approximately 34% of the throughput is refined and sold as finished product and
the remainder of the throughput is returned to the TAPS and either delivered to
repay exchange obligations or sold.
MID-SOUTH SYSTEM
MAPCO's refinery in Memphis, Tennessee ("Memphis Refinery") is the only
refinery in the state of Tennessee and has a throughput capacity of
approximately 120,000 barrels per day. In 1997, the Memphis Refinery processed
an average 110,855 barrels per day compared to 100,730 barrels per day in 1996.
On July 22, 1997, MAPCO announced plans to construct a splitter at the Mid-South
Refinery that will increase the refinery's capacity for propylene production
from the current 2,000 barrels per day to 6,000 barrels per day of the high
margin product. The refinery started production on January 19, 1998, of an
incremental 2,000 barrels per day of refinery grade propylene and expects to
increase production by another 2,000 barrels per day by the end of 1998.
Expenditures for this project are expected to be approximately $20 million.
8
Products produced by the Memphis Refinery are gasoline, low sulfur diesel
fuel, jet fuel, K-1 kerosene, propylene, No. 6 fuel oil, propane and elemental
sulfur. These products are exchanged or marketed primarily in the Mid-South
region of the United States to wholesale customers, such as industrial,
governmental and commercial consumers, jobbers, independent dealers, other
refiner/marketers and to MAPCO's Retail Petroleum business unit. Sales to
MAPCO's Retail Petroleum business unit operations accounted for about 12% of the
Memphis Refinery's 1997 sales volume; the largest single customer accounted for
approximately 17% of total sales. During 1997, the Memphis Refinery's gasoline
sales to MAPCO's Retail Petroleum business unit were 10% of the Refinery's
gasoline production.
The Memphis Refinery has access to crude oil from the Gulf Coast via common
carrier pipeline and by river barges. In addition to domestic crude oil, the
Memphis Refinery has the capability of receiving and processing certain foreign
crudes. During 1997, the majority of the crude oil processed at the Memphis
Refinery was purchased from various suppliers on a posted-plus price basis.
Although this method of purchase reduces the financial effect of volatile crude
oil markets, the financial results of the Refinery may be significantly impacted
by changes in the market prices for crude oil and refined products. MAPCO cannot
with any assurance predict the future of crude oil and product prices or their
impact on the financial results of the Petroleum Refining business unit.
CRUDE OIL TRADING
MAPCO buys, sells and exchanges domestic and foreign crude oil to supply
its refinery systems in Tennessee and Alaska. MAPCO purchased and sold an
average of 93,676 barrels per day of refined petroleum products in 1997 compared
to 35,208 barrels per day in 1996.
In July 1997, MAPCO acquired a 100% ownership interest in Lexas Oil, L.L.C.
("Lexas") which had been an unconsolidated 50%-owned entity since 1995. Lexas's
principal operations include the trading of petroleum and petroleum-related
products.
COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS
The petroleum industry is highly competitive in all phases from the
procurement of crude oil to the refining, distribution and marketing of refined
products. Many of MAPCO's competitors are large integrated oil companies, which,
because of their diverse operations, strong capitalization and recognized brand
names may be better able to withstand volatile industry conditions, shortages of
crude oil or intense price competition.
The principal competitive forces affecting MAPCO's refining businesses are
feedstock costs, refinery efficiency, refinery product mix, product distribution
and marketing costs. Some of the Mid-South System's competitors in the refining
business can more easily process sour crudes, and accordingly, are more flexible
in the crudes which may be processed. Since MAPCO has no crude oil reserves and
does not engage in crude oil exploration, it must obtain its crude oil
requirements from unaffiliated sources. MAPCO believes that it will be able to
obtain adequate crude oil and other feedstocks at generally competitive prices
for the foreseeable future.
The Company is currently in the process of reviewing various alternatives
for further increasing the flexibility of crude oil which may be processed at
the Memphis Refinery as well as opportunities which the Company believes may
improve its margins.
REGULATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
MAPCO's Petroleum refining business unit is subject to various federal,
state and local pricing and environmental laws and regulations. It is the policy
of the Petroleum Refining business unit to comply with such laws and
regulations. MAPCO's refining operations are subject to regulations relating to
air emissions, water discharges, waste generation, transportation, storage and
disposal as well as soil and groundwater contamination which may result from
spillage or discharge of petroleum and hazardous materials at its
9
refineries and terminals. Groundwater monitoring and remediation are ongoing at
both refineries and air and water pollution control equipment is operating at
both refineries to comply with applicable regulations.
The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (the "CAAA") continue to impact the
Petroleum Refining business unit through a number of programs and provisions of
the CAAA. The provisions include Maximum Achievable Control Technology rules
which are being developed for the refining industry, controls on individual
chemical substances and new operating permit rules. The provisions impact other
companies in the industry in similar ways and are not expected to adversely
impact the Company's competitive position.
The Petroleum Refining business unit incurred approximately $3.0 million in
capital expenditures for environmental control facilities in 1997 and has
budgeted $6.0 million in capital expenditures for environmental control
facilities in 1998. Such expenditures are not deemed by the business unit to be
material.
See "Legal Proceedings," Item 3 beginning on page 12 for information
concerning environmental proceedings connected with the Petroleum Refining
business unit.
RETAIL PETROLEUM
MAPCO, primarily under the brand name "MAPCO Express," is engaged in the
retail marketing of gasoline, diesel fuel, other petroleum products, convenience
merchandise, restaurants and deli fast food items at 207 stores and interstate
travel centers in eight Southeastern states and in Texas and at 25 stores in
Anchorage, Fairbanks and southeastern Alaska. MAPCO Express stores represent 38
percent of the convenience store market in Alaska. Effective May 21, 1997, MAPCO
acquired 19 retail convenience stores located primarily in the Nashville,
Tennessee market from EZ-Serve Inc. at a cost of $12 million. The Company has
also announced a retail expansion program which will add 25 new MAPCO Express
stores and travel centers in 1998. All of the motor fuel sold by MAPCO Express
stores is supplied either by exchanges or directly from either the Memphis or
North Pole Refineries.
Revenues in 1997 for the Retail Petroleum business unit were $733.2
million, compared to $714.9 million in 1996. Operating profit in 1997 was $11.8
million, compared to $30.3 million in 1996.
MAPCO's stores have been designed to be modern neighborhood-type
facilities, attracting convenience-oriented customers with a variety of today's
most widely-used products and services. Convenience merchandise and deli fast
food accounted for approximately 55% of Retail Petroleum's gross margins in 1997
and 51% in 1996. The Company owns approximately one-half of the properties upon
which its stores are located and leases the remainder from third parties.
COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS
The principal competitive factors affecting MAPCO's retail businesses are
location, product price and quality, appearance and cleanliness of stores and
brand-name identification. Competition in the convenience store industry is
intense.
In targeted markets such as Memphis and Nashville, Tennessee and Anchorage,
Alaska, the Company is the market leader and enjoys brand-name recognition. The
Retail Petroleum business unit was named 1996 convenience store chain of the
year by Convenience Store Decision magazine. The award is presented annually to
a retailer that best exemplifies excellence throughout its organization. The
categories which are considered in determining the recipient of the award are as
follows: customer service, product quality, marketing and merchandise
innovation, operating efficiency, management effectiveness, imaginative
development of the convenience store concept, public service, profitability and
growth.
REGULATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
MAPCO's Retail Petroleum business unit is subject to various federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. It is the policy of MAPCO's Retail
Petroleum business unit to comply with such laws and regulations. MAPCO's retail
petroleum operations are subject to regulations relating to air emissions, water
discharge, waste generation, transportation, storage and disposal, as well as
soil and groundwater contamina-
10
tion which may result from spillage or discharge of petroleum and hazardous
materials at its retail outlets. Groundwater monitoring and remediation are
ongoing at various MAPCO retail outlets to comply with applicable regulations.
MAPCO's Retail Petroleum business unit is also subject to federal, state
and local regulations regarding petroleum underground storage tanks ("USTs").
The United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") and several states in
which MAPCO conducts retail operations have adopted laws requiring owners and
operators of USTs used for petroleum products to register such tanks with state
offices. In addition, these UST regulations have imposed new technical
standards, corrective action and financial responsibility requirements relating
to such tanks. The regulations establish requirements for owners and operators
of USTs, including leak detection systems, corrosion protection systems, tank
system repairs and replacement, tank closure and corrective action for leaking
tanks. EPA regulations were issued in late 1988, with compliance being phased in
over the course of a ten (10) year period.
The Retail Petroleum business unit incurred approximately $3.6 million in
capital expenditures for environmental control facilities in 1997 and has
budgeted $4.8 million in capital expenditures for environmental control
facilities in 1998. Such expenditures are not deemed by the business unit to be
material.
OTHER BUSINESSES
In February 1997, the Company announced the formation of two new
businesses, TouchStar Technologies, L.L.C. ("TouchStar") and FleetOne, L.L.C.
("FleetOne"), designed to expand the Company's marketing efforts into mobile
information management systems and bundled services for commercial fleets. Other
business revenues and operating loss in 1997 were $24.6 million and $8.9
million, respectively. TouchStar specializes in providing information management
and combines product measurement, data gathering and dispensing technology with
computer hardware and customized software for a total information management
solution. TouchStar offers information management systems to track operations
and control inventories of energy and other products to improve distribution
efficiency and customer service through the use of a mobile, hand-held computer
system. In April 1997, TouchStar acquired ACS Data, Ltd., a British company that
designs and manufactures hand-held computers and peripherals. In September 1997,
TouchStar opened an office in Celaya, Guanajuato, Mexico which markets liquefied
petroleum gas technology equipment, under the name of Espagas, S.A. de C.V.
FleetOne combines MAPCO's Retail Petroleum and Propane Marketing fleet fueling
activities to provide fleet operators with motor fuel, data management and
service alternatives to more effectively manage their businesses.
OTHER MATTERS
On September 10, 1996, the Company completed the disposition of the stock
of its former subsidiary companies, MAPCO Coal Inc. and MC Mining Inc. and their
respective subsidiaries (the "Coal segment") to Alliance Coal Corporation, a
corporation formed by the Beacon Group Energy Investment Fund, L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership, and related entities. The assets sold through the stock
sale include one surface and six underground mining complexes located in
Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland and Virginia, as well as a coal terminal on the
Ohio River near Mt. Vernon, Indiana used for the transloading of coal. In
connection with the sale, the Company made certain guarantees, indemnifications
and representations, and retained certain liabilities; however, management does
not expect these items to have a material impact on future results of
operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
11
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 1997, MAPCO and its business units had 6,508 employees.
Of the total number of employees, 500 were employed in the Natural Gas Liquids
business unit; 2,022 in the Propane Marketing business unit; 2,889 in the Retail
Petroleum business unit; 555 in the Petroleum Refining business unit; 138 in the
TouchStar Technologies and FleetOne businesses; and 404 in the general corporate
area. Less than three percent of MAPCO's work force is unionized and covered by
collective bargaining agreements. Agreements have been entered into with the Oil
Chemical and Atomic Workers Union covering 183 employees in the Petroleum
Refining business unit.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
All the various physical properties are discussed in PART I, Item 1, Supra,
pertaining to MAPCO's business.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
Texas Explosion Litigation
On April 7, 1992, a liquefied petroleum gas explosion occurred near an
underground salt dome storage facility located near Brenham, Texas and owned by
an affiliate of the Company, Seminole Pipeline Company ("Seminole"). The
Company, as well as Seminole, Mid-America Pipeline Company, MAPCO Natural Gas
Liquids Inc., and other non-MAPCO entities were named as defendants in civil
action lawsuits filed in state district courts located in four Texas counties.
Seminole and the related MAPCO entities have settled in excess of 1,600 claims
in these lawsuits. The only lawsuit remaining is the Dallmeyer case which was
tried before a jury in Harris County. In Dallmeyer, the judgment rendered in
March 1996 against defendants Seminole and MAPCO-related entities totaled
approximately $72 million which included nearly $65 million of punitive damages
awarded to the 21 plaintiffs.
Both plaintiffs and defendants have appealed the Dallmeyer judgment to the
Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth District of Texas in Harris County. The
defendants seek to have the judgment modified in many respects, including the
elimination of punitive damages as well as a portion of the actual damages
awarded. If the defendants prevail on appeal, it will result in an award
significantly less than the judgment, or alternatively, a retrial of the case.
The plaintiffs have cross appealed and seek to modify the judgment to increase
the total award plus interest to exceed $155 million. In February and March
1998, the Company entered into settlement agreements involving 12 of the 21
plaintiffs to finally resolve their claims against all defendants for an
aggregate payment of $8 million. These settlements have satisfied and reduced
the judgment on appeal by approximately $33 million.
Management believes that it has defenses of considerable merit and will
vigorously litigate the Dallmeyer appeal or seek a satisfactory settlement to
the Company, but is not able to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter at
this time. The Company has accrued a liability representing an estimate of
amounts it may incur to finally resolve all litigation and has also recorded a
receivable which corresponds to the remainder of its insurance coverage to be
reimbursed by its insurance carrier. Management is unable to estimate a range of
loss beyond the amount accrued. Resolutions unfavorable to the Company could
result in liabilities and charges materially in excess of the amount accrued.
ENVIRONMENTAL
Memphis Refinery
In 1993, the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), Region IV, conducted
an inspection of MAPCO Petroleum Inc.'s ("MPI") Memphis Refinery to evaluate the
refinery's compliance status under the New Source Performance Standards ("NSPS")
promulgated under Section 111 of 42 U.S.C. sec. 7411. Following the inspection,
the EPA issued a Notice of Violation to MPI dated May 5, 1994. This notice
requested that MPI respond with requested information relevant to various
alleged Clean Air Act violations. MPI furnished the requested information and,
during 1995 and 1996 negotiations between MPI and the EPA
12
resulted in a final settlement under which MPI paid the EPA a penalty of
$95,000, and, in 1997, MPI completed three Supplemental Environmental Projects.
The Consent Decree was signed by the judge on March 28, 1997, and entered by the
court on March 31, 1997.
North Pole Refinery
During 1993, the EPA, Region X conducted a multimedia inspection at MAPCO
Alaska Petroleum Inc.'s ("MAPI") North Pole Refinery located near Fairbanks,
Alaska. Following the inspection, the EPA issued two Information Requests
relating to New Source Performance Standards ("NSPS"). In 1995, the U.S.
Department of Justice, Environmental and Natural Resources Division also served
written notice upon MAPI of civil claims under the NSPS of the Clean Air Act.
The Department of Justice offered to defer litigation if MAPI would enter into
settlement negotiations.
After over a year of settlement discussions, MAPI reached agreement with
the Department of Justice and the EPA, Region X. Under the terms of the Consent
Decree, MAPI paid a penalty of $425,000 in December 1996, and performed two
Supplemental Environmental Projects having a total cost of approximately
$397,000 in 1997.
SEC TRADING INVESTIGATION
After the announcement of the proposed merger with The Williams Companies
Inc., the Company received inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission
and the New York Stock Exchange concerning pre-announcement trading in the
Company's securities. The Company is cooperating with the investigations. It has
made partial responses to the inquiries, including information concerning
transfers by certain Company employees into a fund invested exclusively in MAPCO
stock which is part of the Company's 401(k) plan for salaried employees.
GENERAL
The Company and its business units are involved in various other lawsuits,
claims and regulatory proceedings incidental to their businesses. In the opinion
of management, the outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse
effect on the Company's business, consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth
quarter of 1997.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
Information regarding the market for MAPCO's common equity and related
stockholder matters is set forth herein at page 31.
13
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
The following table contains selected financial data for the years
indicated, restated to reflect discontinued operations and a two-for-one stock
split effected in the form of a stock dividend from shares held as treasury
stock, both occurring in 1996 (in millions, except per share data):
[Enlarge/Download Table]
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------
1997(A) 1996 1995 1994(G) 1993
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
INCOME STATEMENT DATA:
Sales and Operating Revenues.............. $3,847.5 $3,353.1 $2,856.6 $2,663.8 $2,300.9
Income from Continuing Operations......... $ 104.5(C) $ 130.2(D) $ 64.2(E) $ 50.2(F) $ 91.8
Income (Loss) from Discontinued
Operations(B)........................... $ (6.3) $ (32.7) $ 10.5 $ 28.9 $ 35.2
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting
Principle............................... $ (1.3) -- -- -- --
Net Income................................ $ 96.9 $ 97.5 $ 74.7 $ 79.1 $ 127.0
PER SHARE DATA:(H)
Basic Earnings per Common Share:
Income from continuing operations....... $ 1.91 $ 2.27 $ 1.08 $ .84 $ 1.53
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations............................ $ (.12) $ (.57) $ .18 $ .48 $ .59
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle.................. $ (.02) -- -- -- --
Net income.............................. $ 1.77 $ 1.70 $ 1.26 $ 1.32 $ 2.12
Diluted Earnings per Common Share:
Income from continuing operations....... $ 1.88 $ 2.26 $ 1.08 $ .83 $ 1.52
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations............................ $ (.12) $ (.57) $ .17 $ .48 $ .58
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle.................. $ (.02) -- -- -- --
Net income.............................. $ 1.74 $ 1.69 $ 1.25 $ 1.31 $ 2.10
Pro Forma amounts assuming retroactive
application of accounting change:
Income from continuing operations....... $ 103.8 $ 129.6 $ 64.2 $ 50.2 $ 91.8
Net Income.............................. $ 97.5 $ 96.9 $ 74.7 $ 79.1 $ 127.0
Cash Dividends Declared per Common
Share................................... $ 0.60 $ 0.525 $ 0.50 $ 0.50 $ 0.50
BALANCE SHEET DATA:(J)(K)
Property, plant and equipment -- net...... $1,481.2 $1,356.9 $1,312.0 $1,200.6 $1,092.6
Total Assets.............................. $2,407.7 $2,170.7 $2,282.7 $2,115.6 $1,912.8
Long-term Debt (excluding current
maturities)............................. $ 786.2 $ 608.4 $ 801.0 $ 720.9 $ 585.5
Stockholders' Equity...................... $ 670.7(I) $ 603.6(I) $ 642.3 $ 622.6 $ 574.3
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES(L)..... 3.7 4.4 2.6 2.4 3.8
---------------
(A) On November 24, 1997, MAPCO Inc. and The Williams Companies, Inc.
("Williams") announced that they had entered into a definitive merger
agreement, as amended as of January 25, 1998, in which MAPCO will become a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Williams in a non-taxable, stock-for-stock
transaction which is expected to be accounted for as a pooling of interest
under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 16. See Note 2 of the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
(B) In June 1996, the Company concluded that it would sell substantially all of
its Coal business to Alliance Coal Corporation ("Alliance"), a corporation
formed by Beacon Group Energy Investment Fund L.P. and related entities.
The transaction was completed on September 10, 1996, with an effective date
of July 31, 1996. The selected historical consolidated financial data have
been prepared to present operating results of the operations sold to
14
Alliance as discontinued operations. For additional information, see Note 3
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(C) Effective January 1, 1997, MAPCO sold its interest in the natural gas
liquids and condensate in the West Panhandle field to Westpan NGL Company,
a subsidiary of MESA Operating Company, for $66.0 million. The Company
recognized a gain of $66.0 million on the transaction in the first quarter
of 1997 as MAPCO had no book value in the interest sold. Income from
continuing operations included $39.5 million from this transaction. See
Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information.
(D) In January 1996, the Company signed an agreement to sell its Thermogas Iowa
propane and liquid fertilizer assets as well as its remaining liquid
fertilizer assets in Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, Ohio and
Wisconsin to CENEX, Inc. ("CENEX"). The sale of assets to CENEX was
completed on March 29, 1996. Income from continuing operations included
$12.8 million ($20.8 million pre-tax) from this transaction. See Note 4 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
(E) Income from continuing operations in 1995 includes a charge for severance
and early retirements associated with reorganizations of $6.5 million
($10.3 million pre-tax). See Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information.
(F) Income from continuing operations in 1994 includes a charge of $44.0
million ($68.7 million pre-tax) related to the settlement of a
long-standing dispute with the State of Alaska relative to its royalty oil
purchase agreements.
(G) On September 1, 1994, MAPCO completed the acquisition of certain assets of
Emro Propane Company. The purchase price included a $186 million cash
payment and the transfer to Emro Marketing Company of the retail
convenience store assets of MAPCO Florida Inc.
(H) On September 30, 1996, a two-for-one stock split effected in the form of a
stock dividend from shares held as treasury stock was distributed. Earnings
Per Common Share and Cash Dividends Declared per Common Share have been
restated for the effect of the stock split. Actual Cash Dividends declared
per share were $1.00 in years 1993 through 1995. In 1997, MAPCO adopted FAS
128 which changed the presentation of per share amounts from prior years.
All per share amounts have been restated for the effect of this change.
(I) In the fourth quarter of 1996, equity put options that entitle the holder,
upon exercise, to sell shares of Common Stock to the Company at a specified
price, were sold in a series of private placements. At December 31, 1997
and 1996, Stockholders' Equity was reduced by $12.3 million and $16.7
million, respectively, as a result of the unexpired equity put options. All
of the outstanding options at December 31, 1997, expired out-of-the-money
during January and February 1998. The Company does not expect to issue any
further equity put options.
(J) The Company, and three of its subsidiaries, have been named as defendants
in civil action lawsuits in four Texas counties. The suits are associated
with a liquefied petroleum gas explosion that occurred on April 7, 1992.
See Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information.
(K) During 1997, 1996, 1995, 1994 and 1993, MAPCO purchased a total of
1,589,354; 2,578,212; 1,163,200; 296,932; and 203,898 shares, respectively,
of its common stock on the open market at a cost of $50.2 million, $98.3
million, $31.1 million, $8.7 million, and $6.2 million, respectively. On
September 30, 1996, 28,674,812 treasury shares were distributed to
stockholders in the form of a two-for-one stock dividend. (All share
amounts have been restated to reflect this stock dividend). In the third
quarter of 1996, the Board of Directors approved a 7.0 million share stock
repurchase plan, representing 12% of the post-split common stock
outstanding. As of December 31, 1997, 3,789,606 shares had been purchased
under this authorization for $117.9 million and there were 8,405,267 shares
of common stock in the treasury. In November 1997, in connection with the
announcement of the Company's planned merger with The Williams Company,
MAPCO suspended further purchases of treasury stock.
(L) For purposes of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges amounts, (i)
earnings consist of income from continuing operations before fixed charges,
minority interest expense and income taxes for MAPCO and its majority-owned
subsidiaries; and (ii) fixed charges consist of interest and debt expense
on all indebtedness (without reduction of interest capitalized) and that
portion of rental payments on operating leases estimated to represent an
interest factor.
15
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.
Management's Discussion and Analysis may contain forward-looking
statements, including, without limitation, statements relating to the Company's
plans, strategies, objectives and expectations and are made pursuant to the
"safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Any such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and
uncertainties and the Company's actual results may differ materially from those
forward-looking statements. The Company does not undertake to update, revise or
correct any of the forward-looking information contained in this document.
Readers are cautioned that such forward-looking statements should be read in
connection with the Company's disclosures under the heading "CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE 'SAFE HARBOR' PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE
SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995" on page 1.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of MAPCO Inc.'s ("MAPCO" or the
"Company") financial condition, results of operations and cash flow should be
read in conjunction with the financial statements and segment information
presented on pages through of this report.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
CASH GENERATION (USAGE)
Cash generation (usage) was as follows (in millions):
[Enlarge/Download Table]
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------
1997 1996 1995
----- ----- -----
Net cash provided by continuing operations.................. $ 69 $ 241 $ 167
Net cash provided by discontinued operations................ -- 22 63
----- ----- -----
Net cash provided by operating activities................... 69 263 230
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities......... (240) 114 (244)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities......... 107 (305) 17
----- ----- -----
Cash generation (usage)..................................... $ (64) $ 72 $ 3
===== ===== =====
The decrease in cash provided by continuing operations in 1997 was
primarily due to reduced operating profit, increased working capital
requirements and the payment of $33 million for non-compete agreements entered
into with executive officers. The increase in funds provided by continuing
operations in 1996 was primarily attributable to increased income by all of
MAPCO's business units.
The decrease in cash provided by discontinued operations in 1996 primarily
reflects lower income by the Coal operations due to the sale of those operations
at the end of July 1996.
Capital expenditures and acquisitions in 1997 were $238 million, of which
$69 million were for capital items necessary to maintain existing operations.
Significant capital expenditures and acquisitions in 1997 included: $39 million
for the acquisition (which includes the exchange of $18 million of MAPCO common
stock plus $21 million in cash) of various propane marketing businesses, $12
million for the acquisition of 19 convenience stores from EZ-Serve Inc., $11
million for the acquisition of ACS Data LTD., $7 million for the acquisition of
the assets of Gas Supply Inc., $28 million to build or remodel convenience
stores and travel centers, $21 million for the addition of a propylene splitter,
expansion of the alkalization unit, replacement of the fluid catalytic cracker
blower and an additional storage tank at the Mid-South Refinery, $17 million to
build new plants and implement a new computer system in the Propane Marketing
business unit and $6 million for the new gasoline and jet fuel expansion
projects at the Alaska Refinery. The proceeds from net assets held for sale
includes the $66.0 million received from the sale of MAPCO's interests in the
West Panhandle field. Expenditures in 1997 for investments in unconsolidated
affiliates were $71 million, which
16
included $59 million for Discovery (net of $68 million of MAPCO's portion of
Discovery's financing proceeds), $5 million for the Alliance Pipeline investment
and $6 million for the Rio Grande Pipeline venture.
Capital expenditures and acquisitions in 1996 were $157 million, of which
$50 million were for capital items necessary to maintain continuing operations.
Included in the $157 million was $22 million for capital expenditures for the
discontinued coal operations. Capital expenditures in 1996 also included $12
million for a saturated gas plant expansion at the Memphis Refinery, $9 million
for a gasoline expansion project at the North Pole Refinery, $6 million for the
acquisition of a propane company in Colorado, $5 million for expansion of the
Memphis crude line, $4 million for the expansion of the Hobbs Station in west
Texas and $4 million for environmental projects. MAPCO also expended $23 million
in 1996 for its investment in the Rio Grande Pipeline joint venture. Cash from
investing activities in 1996 included $236 million received from the sale of the
Coal segment to Alliance Coal Corporation, a corporation formed by The Beacon
Group Energy Investment Fund L.P. ("Beacon") and $43 million from the sale of
Thermogas Company's Iowa propane and liquid fertilizer assets to CENEX Inc.
("CENEX").
Capital expenditures and acquisitions in 1995 were $251 million, of which
$50 million was for capital items necessary to maintain continuing operations.
Capital expenditures in 1995 included $82 million for the expansion of the Rocky
Mountain Pipeline System, $30 million for capital improvements at the Memphis
Refinery, $11 million for the acquisition of 27 retail gasoline/convenience
stores in the Nashville, Tennessee, market area, $33 million for the
discontinued Coal operations and $16 million for environmental projects.
Cash from financing activities in 1997 included the use of $50 million in
cash to purchase 1.6 million shares of treasury stock, $33 million to pay cash
dividends and $30 million in payments on long-term debt. In the first quarter of
1997, MAPCO issued $100 million of senior subordinated notes with a coupon rate
of 7.25% that are due in 2009 and $100 million of senior subordinated debentures
with a coupon rate of 7.70% that are due in 2027.
Cash from financing activities in 1996 included the use of $161 million in
cash to reduce variable-rate borrowings, $98 million to purchase 2.6 million
shares of treasury stock, $30 million for cash dividends and $21 million to
reduce long-term debt. Part of the proceeds from the sale of the Coal segment
were used to pay down debt.
Cash from financing activities in 1995 included $105 million of borrowings
of variable-rate debt, $31 million to purchase treasury stock, $30 million for
cash dividends and $27 million to reduce long-term debt.
Various loan agreements contain restrictive covenants which, among other
things, limit the payment of advances or dividends by two of Natural Gas
Liquids'("NGL") subsidiaries to MAPCO. At December 31, 1997, $250 million of net
assets were restricted by such provisions, which included $60 million of
restricted net assets associated with the Discovery joint venture. At December
31, 1996, $190 million of net assets were restricted by such provisions.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
MAPCO's primary sources of liquidity are its cash and cash equivalents,
internal cash generation, and external financing, including its long-term
leasing arrangement. At December 31, 1997, MAPCO's cash and cash equivalents
were $41 million compared to $105 million at December 31, 1996.
MAPCO's external financing sources include its bank credit agreements, its
uncommitted bank credit lines, its ability to issue public or private debt,
including commercial paper, and its leasing arrangement. MAPCO's bank credit
agreements represent a total committed line of credit of $400 million which
expires in March 2002. The bank credit agreement serves as a back-up for
outstanding commercial paper and for borrowings against bank money market lines.
As of December 31, 1997 and 1996, no borrowings were outstanding under the bank
credit agreement.
In 1996, the Company entered into a long-term lease arrangement to
accommodate the acquisition and construction of certain assets. Leases, which
will be entered into under the master lease arrangement, will be
17
for seven year terms. Rent payable under the lease is based on the amounts spent
for acquisition or construction of assets and the lessor's cost of funds. After
the non-cancelable lease term, the arrangement may be extended by agreement of
the parties, or the Company may purchase or arrange for the sale of the assets.
As of December 31, 1997, all of the $100 million commitment remained available
under the lease.
In 1990, MAPCO filed a shelf registration statement with the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("SEC") providing for the issuance of up to $400 million of
debt securities. As of December 31, 1997, MAPCO had outstanding $264 million of
Medium Term Notes issued pursuant to this registration. The remaining amount of
debt securities authorized under this registration was deregistered during 1997.
On January 31, 1997, MAPCO filed a shelf registration with the SEC providing for
the issuance of up to $500 million of debt and equity securities. The Company
issued $200 million of medium and long-term notes under that registration during
the first quarter of 1997. The proceeds from that debt issuance were used for
general corporate purposes, including working capital, capital expenditures,
reduction of other debt and acquisitions.
The Company was a party to various interest rate swap agreements with
financial institutions which effectively changed the Company's interest rate
exposure from variable rates to fixed rates on $100 million of debt. In the
first quarter of 1997, the Company recognized a $4.3 million gain upon
termination of the interest rate swap agreements, which was done concurrently
with the pay-off of the related debt.
In the third quarter of 1996, the Company announced a four-point plan
approved by the Board of Directors, which included the repurchase of up to 7.0
million shares, or twelve percent of post-split outstanding stock, a twenty
percent dividend increase and a two-for-one stock split. The two-for-one stock
split, effected in the form of a stock dividend from shares held as treasury
stock, was distributed on September 30, 1996, to shareholders of record on
September 16, 1996. As of December 31, 1997, 3.8 million shares have been
repurchased under this authorization for $118 million. The share repurchase
program was suspended on December 4, 1997, by a resolution of MAPCO's Board of
Directors which rescinded all previous authority to purchase shares of the
Company's common stock. This action was taken in conjunction with the
announcement of MAPCO's pending merger with the Williams Company.
During 1997, the Company sold or extended equity put options on 1.2 million
shares of MAPCO's common stock with strike prices ranging from $29 to $32 5/8
per share. During 1996, the Company sold equity put options on 0.6 million
shares of MAPCO's common stock with strike prices ranging from $29 to $32 1/2
per share. As of December 31, 1997 and 1996, equity put options on 0.4 million
and 0.6 million shares, respectively, remained outstanding. All of the options
outstanding at December 31, 1997, expired out-of-the-money during January and
February 1998. MAPCO has no plans to issue further equity put options. MAPCO's
Board of Directors had given Management the authorization to issue put options
on up to 1.5 million shares of MAPCO's common stock.
On March 29, 1996, the Company sold its Iowa Thermogas propane and
fertilizer assets and its remaining liquid fertilizer assets in Arkansas,
Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Minnesota and Wisconsin to CENEX. The transaction
resulted in proceeds of $43 million which were used primarily for capital
expenditures, share repurchases and general corporate purposes.
In July 1996, the Company signed an agreement with Beacon to sell
substantially all of the net assets of the Coal business. That transaction was
finalized on September 10, 1996. Total proceeds from the transaction of $236
million were used to pay down debt.
Effective January 1, 1997, MAPCO sold its interest in the natural gas
liquids and condensate in the West Panhandle field to Westpan NGL Company, a
subsidiary of MESA Operating Company, for $66 million. The Company recognized a
gain of $66 million on the transaction in the first quarter of 1997 as MAPCO had
no book value in the interest sold. As part of the sales agreement, MAPCO was
released from its liability for its share of prior natural gas liquids
over-takes.
Effective January 1, 1997, MAPCO acquired the assets of Gas Supply, Inc.
("Gas Supply"), an independent wholesale propane company based in Minneapolis,
Minnesota, for approximately $7 million, plus working capital. The acquisition
has been used to expand MAPCO's current wholesale propane marketing
18
activities under the trade name "Gas Supply." MAPCO also acquired Gas Supply's
related product sales, a construction company, a 40,000-barrel storage facility
and a rail car and truck terminal in Rosemont, Minnesota.
In April 1997, MAPCO acquired ACS Data, Ltd. ("ACS"), a company with
headquarters in Manchester, England, at a cost of approximately $11 million. ACS
designs and manufactures hand-held computers and peripherals.
Effective May 21, 1997, MAPCO acquired 19 retail convenience stores located
primarily in the Nashville, Tennessee market from EZ-Serve Inc. at a cost of $12
million.
On April 30, 1997, MAPCO purchased a 5% ownership in the Alliance pipeline
project. The Alliance pipeline will construct a 1,900 mile, 36-inch diameter,
natural gas pipeline transmission system to carry natural gas and natural gas
liquids from western Canada to the Midwestern United States for marketing
throughout North America. Alliance's delivery points near Chicago include a
natural gas liquids extraction facility proposed by Aux Sable Liquids Products
LP, which is adjacent to the northern end of MAPCO's 10,000 mile NGL pipeline
network. Construction of the pipeline is expected to begin in the second quarter
of 1998 with completion anticipated by year-end 1999.
During 1997, MAPCO acquired nineteen propane companies at a cost of
approximately $39 million. These companies, with combined sales during 1996 of
over 35 million gallons of propane and other related products, have market areas
in Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma and
South Dakota.
In July 1997, MAPCO announced plans to construct a splitter at the
Mid-South Refinery that would increase the refinery's capacity for propylene
production from 2,000 barrels per day to 6,000 barrels per day of the
high-margin product. The refinery started production on January 19, 1998, of an
incremental 2,000 barrels per day of refinery grade propylene and expects to
increase production by another 2,000 barrels per day by the end of 1998.
Expenditures for this project were $7 million in 1997 and total costs are
expected to be approximately $20 million.
In 1997 MAPCO announced plans to construct a third crude unit at the Alaska
Refinery that will produce an additional 17,000 barrels per day of refined
products, including 14,000 barrels per day of jet fuel. The project is expected
to be completed in the fourth quarter of 1998 at a cost of $70 million.
In July 1997, MAPCO acquired a 100% ownership interest in LEXAS OIL, LLC,
which had previously been an unconsolidated 50%-owned entity since January 1,
1995.
On August 1, 1997, MAPCO announced that it had reached an understanding
with Enterprise Products Company ("Enterprise") to form a joint venture for the
development of a natural gas liquids transportation and distribution system. It
is anticipated this system will be capable of distributing product from key NGL
sources in southern Louisiana with direct connections to major NGL markets,
including the Louisiana river markets, Lake Charles, Louisiana and Mont Belvieu,
Texas. The joint venture will be a limited liability company in which MAPCO and
Enterprise will each have a 50 percent interest.
On September 5, 1997, MAPCO announced the opening of its new office under
the name of Espagas, S.A. de C.V. ("Espagas") in Celaya, Guanajuato, Mexico and
has future plans to open an additional office in Mexico City. Espagas markets
liquefied gas (LPG) technology equipment as a part of MAPCO's TouchStar
Technologies LLC.
In September 1997, MAPCO launched a new company, Thermogas Energy, LLC,
that will form joint ventures with rural electric cooperatives and municipal
utilities to market and distribute propane. As of December 31, 1997, Thermogas
Energy, LLC, had completed joint ventures with two rural cooperatives in the
state of Kentucky.
On November 24, 1997, MAPCO Inc. and The Williams Companies, Inc. announced
that they had entered into a definitive merger agreement in which MAPCO will
become a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Williams Companies, Inc. in a
non-taxable, stock-for-stock transaction which is expected to be accounted for
19
as a pooling of interest under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 16. See
Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
Construction for the gas gathering system for the Discovery project has
been completed and gas deliveries began in December 1997. The project's gas
processing plant and fractionator are under construction and both are expected
to be fully operational by July 1998.
Capital expenditures in 1998 are currently expected to be about $190
million, which includes $93 million of operating necessities and $97 million for
expansion projects. MAPCO expects to utilize cash from operations and short-term
funding sources, proceeds from the sale of assets as needed and, if needed,
proceeds from additional borrowings from the shelf registration statement filed
with SEC in 1997 to meet anticipated 1998 capital expenditures. MAPCO's
long-term liquidity is expected to increase since cash from operations is
anticipated to exceed currently projected capital expenditures, environmental
projects, debt service and dividends. MAPCO anticipates that future excess
internal cash generation will be used primarily for debt reduction and to fund
new capital projects.
MAPCO's existing debt and credit agreements contain covenants which limit
the amount of additional indebtedness the Company can incur. Management
believes, however, that MAPCO has sufficient capacity to fund its anticipated
needs.
INFLATION
During the past five years, MAPCO has benefitted from the relatively low
rates of inflation experienced in the United States. However, MAPCO's operating
costs are influenced to a greater extent by specific price changes in oil and
gas and related industries than by changes in general inflation. Crude, refined
product and natural gas liquids prices are particularly sensitive to OPEC
production levels and/or the attitudes of traders concerning the supply and
demand balance in the near future. These costs could increase with a possible
adverse effect on MAPCO's profitability. Although every effort will be made to
do so, it is possible that MAPCO, like many other companies, may not be able to
adjust its sales prices to maintain parity with inflation-driven operating
costs.
OTHER
MAPCO has completed an internal assessment of the applications, engineering
systems, technical infrastructure, imbedded systems and other components in
regard to the year 2000. During 1997, the Company expensed $1 million of costs
associated with modifying MAPCO's internal-use software and hardware for the
year 2000 and the projected total costs that will be expensed during 1998
through the year 2000 is expected to be approximately $10 million. In addition,
the Company has replaced or is replacing six major applications, including its
financial accounting system, pipeline operations system, propane operations
system, retail petroleum store reporting system, materials and management system
and payroll and human resources system, whose costs are being capitalized. The
Company has capitalized $27 million associated with these systems and the total
amount which the Company expects to capitalize will be approximately $65
million. The Company expects to have its remediation efforts completed by the
end of 1999, and does not expect any material impact on its results of
operations, liquidity or financial position due to incomplete or untimely
resolution of the year 2000 issue.
MAPCO is continuing its review of the potential costs or consequences of
incomplete or untimely resolution of the year 2000 issue by other entities. The
Company is not able, at this time, to determine what impact incomplete or
untimely resolution of the year 2000 issue by other entities could have. At this
time, the Company has no reason to believe that this issue could materially
impact MAPCO's financial position, liquidity or results of operations.
MAPCO maintains property and liability insurance at limits believed to be
sufficient to cover estimated potential risks. Losses up to deductible amounts
of the various coverages would not have a material effect on MAPCO's financial
position, liquidity or results of operations.
20
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
MAPCO's results of operations were significantly influenced by the
following major 1997 events:
- The November 1997 announcement of and pending merger with The Williams
Company, Inc.
- Sale of the Company's natural gas liquids and condensate interests in the
West Panhandle field ("Westpan sale"), which was effective January 1,
1997.
- Warmer-than-normal weather patterns throughout the fall and winter months
of 1997.
- The operations of several start-up companies and the implementation of a
number of growth initiatives.
INCOME STATEMENT
1997 Results Compared to 1996
Income from continuing operations was $105 million in 1997 compared to $130
million in 1996. Excluding a $40 million ($66 million pre-tax) gain on the
Westpan sale from 1997 and a $13 million gain ($21 million pre-tax) on the sale
of propane and fertilizer assets in 1996 to CENEX ("CENEX sale"), income from
continuing operations decreased $52 million, or 44%, from 1996.
Net income in 1997 was $97 million which included a $6 million loss on
disposal of the Coal operations and a $1 million charge for a cumulative effect
of a change in accounting principle. The loss on disposal of Coal operations,
net of income taxes, was $6 million and includes liabilities recorded in
association with certain guarantees made pursuant to the sale of the Coal
business in 1996. Net income in 1996 was $98 million which included $15 million
of income from the discontinued Coal operations and a $47 million loss on the
disposal of the Coal operations. A discussion of the discontinued Coal
operations is contained in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.
Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations, excluding the
impact of the Westpan sale from 1997 and the gain on Cenex sale from 1996
results, were $1.17 in 1997 compared to $2.04 in 1996. Diluted weighted average
common shares outstanding in 1997 were 55.6 million compared to 57.6 million in
1996.
Sales and operating revenues by business unit were as follows (in
millions):
[Enlarge/Download Table]
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------
1997 1996
---------- ----------
Natural Gas Liquids......................................... $ 751 $ 716
Propane Marketing........................................... 413 430
Petroleum Refining.......................................... 2,309 1,813
Retail Petroleum............................................ 733 715
Other....................................................... 25 --
Eliminations................................................ (383) (321)
------ ------
$3,848 $3,353
====== ======
Natural Gas Liquids sales and operating revenues increased $35 million
principally due to increased trading sales and pipeline revenues, partially
offset by lower Westpan revenues. Trading sales from the Canada operations
increased $53 million as those operations had only four months of activity in
1996. Other trading sales decreased $13 million reflecting significantly lower
NGL prices in the current year. Pipeline revenues increased $3 million
principally due to new plant connections and new customer transportation
agreements, partially offset by lower propane heating revenues which were
negatively impacted by a poor crop-drying season and above normal temperatures
in 1997 compared to colder temperatures in 1996. Revenues decreased $10 million
due to the January 1997 sale of MAPCO's interest in West Panhandle field. Of the
$35 million
21
increase in NGL's sales and operating revenues, $68 was attributable to
increased volumes, partially offset by $33 million decrease in sales
attributable to lower prices.
Propane Marketing sales and operating revenues decreased $17 million.
Excluding the impact of the CENEX sale from 1996 operating results, revenues
increased $7 million as wholesale sales increased $21 million, partially offset
by a $13 million decrease in retail sales. The increase in wholesale sales
reflects the impact of additional volumes from the acquisition of Gas Supply in
January 1997. The decrease in retail sales was due to decreased volumes and
slightly lower prices. Although volume increases were realized from the nineteen
acquisitions completed during 1997, these increases were more than offset by
decreased demand as a result of unusually warm temperatures throughout Propane
Marketing's market areas. Of the $7 million overall increase in Propane
Marketing's sales, $8 million was attributable to increased volumes, partially
offset by a $1 million decrease in sales attributable to reduced sales prices.
Petroleum Refining sales and operating revenues increased $496 million,
primarily due to increased volumes at the Mid-South Refinery. The increase in
sales principally reflects increased demand for petroleum products, aggressive
marketing in the Memphis and Ohio River Valley areas and the inclusion of Lexas
Oil operations, which prior to July 1997 were unconsolidated. Total Mid-South
Refinery sales volumes increased 68 thousand barrels per day, of which 9
thousand barrels per day were supplied through increased production at the
refinery and 59 thousand barrels per day through increased purchases of refined
product. Sales volumes at the Alaska Refinery increased 4% over 1996 levels,
despite the negative impact of fourth quarter 1997 events, which included sharp
declines in West Coast prices and the Asian financial crisis. Of the $496
million increase in Petroleum Refining sales, $631 million was attributable to
increased volumes, partially offset by a $135 million decrease in sales
attributable to lower prices.
Retail Petroleum sales and operating revenues increased $18 million as
increased gasoline and merchandise sales were partially offset by decreased
diesel sales. Gasoline sales increased $11 million due to a 13 million gallon
increase in sales volumes, primarily attributable to the May 1997 EZ-Serve
acquisition, partially offset by the impact of an average 2 cent per gallon
decrease in pump prices. Diesel sales decreased $15 million due to a 10 million
gallon decrease in volumes and an average 2 cent per gallon decrease in pump
prices. The decrease in diesel sales volumes was due to the absence of the
Rising Fawn travel center and the discontinuation of the Fuelman operations. The
Rising Fawn travel center, which burned during 1996, has been rebuilt and was
re-opened on December 1, 1997. The Fuelman operations were discontinued because
of the start-up of MAPCO's FleetOne business. Merchandise sales increased $22
million due to the increased store count from the EZ-Serve acquisition and an
overall increase in per store merchandise sales.
Other sales and operating revenues include FleetOne and TouchStar revenues.
FleetOne had revenues of $16 million principally from the sale of fuel from
unattended fueling sites. TouchStar had revenues of $9 million, primarily from
ACS Data Ltd. which was acquired in April 1997.
Outside purchases and operating expenses by business unit are provided
below (in millions):
[Enlarge/Download Table]
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------
1997 1996
--------------------- ---------------------
OUTSIDE OPERATING OUTSIDE OPERATING
PURCHASES EXPENSES PURCHASES EXPENSES
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Natural Gas Liquids........................... $ 465 $125 $ 401 $138
Propane Marketing............................. 180 91 235 72
Petroleum Refining............................ 2,054 113 1,617 97
Retail Petroleum.............................. 334 106 320 85
Other......................................... 17 11 -- --
------ ---- ------ ----
$3,050 $446 $2,573 $392
====== ==== ====== ====
Natural Gas Liquids outside purchases increased $64 million because of
increased trading purchases. Purchases by the Canadian operations, which had
only four months of operations in 1996, increased $52 million. Other trading
purchases increased $12 million principally due to increased volumes. Operating
22
expenses decreased $13 million primarily because of the absence of Westpan
operating expenses, which were $13 million in 1996. Transportation costs were
essentially unchanged as increased power costs, reflecting increased pipeline
product movements and higher natural gas prices, were offset by lower property
taxes and other costs.
Propane Marketing outside purchases decreased $55 million. Excluding the
impact of the CENEX transaction from 1996 purchases, outside purchases decreased
$38 million, primarily due to decreased amounts for propane products. Average
wholesale propane costs decreased 11 cents per gallon which reduced outside
purchases by $59 million. Purchased propane volumes increased 50 million
gallons, or $19 million, partially offsetting the impact of lower prices.
Operating expenses increased $19 million; however, excluding the operating
expenses related to the assets sold to CENEX, operating expenses increased $23
million. This increase primarily reflects increased salary and wages associated
with acquisitions and growth initiatives during 1997 and increased supplies, bad
debt, environmental and other costs.
Petroleum Refining outside purchases increased $437 million as increased
purchases by the Mid-South Refinery were partially offset by reduced purchases
by the Alaska Refinery. Mid-South purchases increased $446 million and were
attributable to increased purchases of crude, reflecting the increased
throughput volumes, increased purchases of refined products and the inclusion of
Lexas Oil purchases. The Alaska Refinery purchases decreased $9 million
reflecting a 379 thousand barrel decrease in throughput which reduced overall
crude purchases. Operating expenses increased $16 million due to increased costs
by both the Mid-South and Alaska Refineries. Mid-South's operating expenses
increased $5 million, primarily due to increased crude throughput. Crude
throughput at the Mid-South Refinery increased 10% and operating expenses
increased 8% over 1996. Alaska's operating expenses increased $11 million due to
planned increases in maintenance activities, including a mini-turnaround on the
Sufolane unit and maintenance on the crude tanks and heat exchangers, increased
environmental costs and increased bonus, pension and other benefit costs.
Retail Petroleum outside purchases increased $14 million due to increased
purchases of gasoline and merchandise, which were partially offset by decreased
purchases of diesel fuel. Purchases of gasoline increased $14 million,
reflecting the 13 million gallon increase in gasoline sales for the year. Diesel
purchases decreased $15 million due to the decreased sales volumes combined with
a 3 cent per gallon decrease in wholesale prices. Merchandise purchases
increased $17 million to meet the increase in overall merchandise sales for the
year. Operating expenses increased $21 million. Increases in salaries and wages,
benefits, advertising, professional services and environmental costs accounted
for most of the increase. These increases were the result of the increased store
count from the EZ-Serve acquisition, and increased per store expenses associated
with the implementation of strategic growth initiatives.
Other outside purchases of $17 million included fuel purchases by FleetOne
and purchases of computer products for resale by TouchStar. Operating expenses
of $11 million included the operating costs for ACS Data Ltd, which was acquired
during 1997 and start-up costs for FleetOne and TouchStar. FleetOne's start-up
costs included termination of Fuelman agreement, consulting charges associated
with marketing and business development, software development costs and expenses
related to the start-up of operations in Mexico. Start-up expenses for TouchStar
included Espagas, TouchStar's new Mexican operations and other salaries and
consulting fees.
Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses increased $34 million
principally due to higher costs in Corporate, Propane Marketing and Petroleum
Refining. Corporate's SG&A expense increase was principally the result of
increased labor and associated costs reflecting an increase in number of
employees over 1996. Also included in the increase was $2 million for
merger-related expenses and establishing, in August 1996, the Marketing and
Business Development department to develop new business opportunities for the
Company and increased outside services, legal and travel expenses. The increase
in Propane Marketing's SG&A expenses reflects increased salary, benefit, travel
and outside services costs associated with the acquisitions and market expansion
programs conducted during the year. Petroleum Refining's SG&A increase reflects
increased salary, benefit and outside services costs, primarily related to
reorganization costs at the Mid-South Refinery, and increased salary, benefit
and travel costs at the Alaska Refinery.
23
Interest and debt expense decreased $5 million. Capitalized interest,
primarily associated with the Discovery Project, increased $6 million over the
same period in 1997. Otherwise, decreased interest on commercial paper and the
ESOP loan were offset by increased interest expense on the 12-year and 30-year
bonds issued during the first quarter of 1997.
The $66 million gain on the sale of net assets held for sale in 1997
reflects the gain on sale of MAPCO's interest in the liquids and condensate in
the West Panhandle field in the first quarter of 1997. The $21 million gain in
1996 was a gain on sale of the fertilizer and Iowa propane assets to CENEX.
Other income in 1997 included $4 million for the gain on the termination of
interest rate swap agreements, which was partially offset by a $3 million
additional accrual associated with the Texas explosion litigation (see Note 16
to the Consolidated Financial Statements). Other income in 1996 included $2
million for interest received from the Beacon Investment Group associated with
the sale of the Coal segment, a $4 million gain on the sale of two corporate
airplanes and a $1 million gain on the sale of an in-house developed business
consulting concept, partially offset by $1 million of expenses for Coal
operations and other charges.
MAPCO's effective tax rate for 1997 was 40.2% compared to 38.6% in 1996.
The primary reason for the increase in the effective rate was the absence of
coal depletion during 1997. The difference between the statutory Federal income
tax rate of 35% and the effective tax rate for 1997 and 1996 was due to state
income taxes, adjustments to prior year accruals and depletion expense related
to the coal operations.
1996 Results Compared to 1995
Income from continuing operations was $130 million in 1996 compared to $64
million in 1995. Excluding a $13 million ($21 million pre-tax) gain on the sale
of assets to CENEX from 1996 results, income from continuing operations
increased $53 million, or 83%, over 1995. Income from continuing operations in
1995 was reduced $6 million ($10 million pre-tax) for reorganization charges.
Net income in 1996 was $98 million which included $15 million of income
from the discontinued Coal operations and a $47 million loss on the disposal of
the coal operations. A discussion of the discontinued Coal operations is
contained in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements. Net income in 1995
was $75 million and included $11 million of income from discontinued operations.
Income from discontinued operations was reduced $19 million ($30 million
pre-tax) in 1995 from the impact of applying SFAS No. 121.
Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations, excluding the
gain on sale of assets CENEX, were $2.04 in 1996 compared to $1.08 in 1995.
Diluted earnings per common share from net income were $1.69 in 1996 compared to
$1.25 in 1995. Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding in 1996 were
57.6 million compared to 59.7 million in 1995.
Sales and operating revenues by business unit were as follows (in
millions):
[Enlarge/Download Table]
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------
1996 1995
---------- ----------
Natural Gas Liquids......................................... $ 716 $ 550
Propane Marketing........................................... 430 338
Petroleum Refining.......................................... 1,813 1,574
Retail Petroleum............................................ 715 631
Eliminations................................................ (321) (236)
------ ------
$3,353 $2,857
====== ======
Sales and operating revenues increased $496 million in 1996, due to
increased sales by all of the operating units.
24
Natural Gas Liquids sales and operating revenues increased $166 million
principally due to increased trading and pipeline revenues. Trading sales
increased $130 million as market prices increased over 11 cents per gallon on
slightly higher volumes. Pipeline revenues increased $42 million principally due
to increased volumes from the Four Corners Pipeline loop project completed in
the first quarter of 1996, increased movements of demethanized mix from Rocky
Mountain origins to the Gulf Coast and increased movements of propane to the
heating markets in the Midwest. Eagle Oil revenues decreased $5 million as those
operations were phased out in January 1996. Overall, $116 million of the sales
increase was attributable to higher prices and $50 million due to increased
volumes.
Propane Marketing sales and operating revenues increased $92 million,
despite the divestiture of Propane Marketing's liquid fertilizer and Iowa
propane operations during 1996. Excluding the divested Iowa operations, Retail
Marketing's sales increased $126 million. This increase was primarily
attributable to increased retail, wholesale and spot propane sales which were
partially offset by lower fertilizer sales. Retail propane sales increased $66
million as increased demand due to colder weather resulted in a 39 million
gallon increase in retail propane volumes combined with a 17% increase in
average retail prices. Wholesale and spot propane sales increased $66 million
due to increased prices. Fertilizer sales decreased $8 million reflecting the
divestiture of those operations during 1996. Overall, $54 million of Propane
Marketing's sales increase was attributable to higher prices and $72 million due
to increased volumes.
Petroleum Refining's sales and operating revenues increased $239 million
due to increased production and sales volumes at the Memphis and North Pole
Refineries, as well as higher sales prices at the North Pole Refinery.
Production at the Memphis Refinery increased 19,512 barrels per day and total
barrels sold increased by 25,741 barrels per day. The increase in sales volumes
was partially offset by lower average refined product sales prices of $2.95 per
barrel. Production at the North Pole Refinery increased 3,753 barrels per day,
total barrels sold increased 5,124 barrels per day and average refined product
sales prices increased $3.62 per barrel. The $239 million sales increase was
attributable to a $329 million increase in volumes, partially offset by a $90
million decrease in average sales prices.
Retail Petroleum's sales and operating revenues increased $84 million
because both fuel and merchandise sales increased. Gasoline sales increased $29
million primarily due to a $0.13 per gallon increase in average pump prices
which more than offset the impact of a 5 million gallon decrease in gasoline
volumes sold. Diesel sales increased $39 million as average pump prices
increased $0.14 per gallon and volumes increased by almost 18 million gallons.
Merchandise sales increased $16 million due primarily to increased volumes.
Overall, $56 million of Retail Petroleum's sales increase was attributable to
higher prices and $28 million to increased volumes.
Outside purchases and operating expenses by business unit are provided
below (in millions):
[Enlarge/Download Table]
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------
1996 1995
--------------------- ---------------------
OUTSIDE OPERATING OUTSIDE OPERATING
PURCHASES EXPENSES PURCHASES EXPENSES
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Natural Gas Liquids........................... $ 401 $138 $ 292 $114
Propane Marketing............................. 235 72 172 69
Petroleum Refining............................ 1,617 97 1,408 96
Retail Petroleum.............................. 320 85 315 84
------ ---- ------ ----
$2,573 $392 $2,187 $363
====== ==== ====== ====
Natural Gas Liquids outside purchases increased $109 million. The increase
was principally due to increased trading purchases caused by higher market
prices, partially offset by decreased Eagle Oil purchases. Operating expenses
increased $24 million primarily because of increased power costs and Westpan
expenses. Power costs increased due to increased pipeline product movements and
higher natural gas prices. Westpan operating expenses increased due to accruals
for severance and other costs associated with the closure of the Bivins gas
plant.
25
Propane Marketing outside purchases increased $63 million; however,
excluding the divested Iowa operations, the increase in outside purchases was
$69 million. The increase was attributable to the additional purchases required
to meet the increase in retail, wholesale and spot sales volumes and higher
wholesale propane prices. These increases were partially offset by lower
fertilizer purchases due to the divestiture of that product line during 1996.
Operating expenses increased $3 million; however, excluding the Iowa operating
expenses from the totals, operating expenses increased $10 million due to
general increases in various expense categories that were related to the
increased sales volumes.
Petroleum Refining outside purchases increased $209 million because of the
increased volume of crude purchases associated with the increased production at
the refineries, higher average crude prices and increased volumes of refined
products purchased. Operating expenses increased $1 million principally due to
costs associated with the increased crude throughput.
Retail Petroleum outside purchases increased $5 million, principally due to
additional merchandise purchases to meet increased demand. Product purchases
from the Petroleum Refining business unit, which are not reflected in the above
tables due to eliminations, increased $63 million due to higher gasoline and
diesel prices and increased diesel volumes. Operating expenses increased $1
million.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $9 million
principally due to higher salary and benefit costs associated with restructuring
MAPCO's operations from segments into the business units and establishing a
Business Development department, in January 1996, whose purpose is to develop
new business opportunities.
The $10 million reorganization charge in 1995 related to reorganizations in
the Natural Gas Liquids and Propane Marketing business units and in Corporate.
See Note 13 in the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
The $21 million gain on sale of net assets held for disposal related to the
Iowa propane and liquid fertilizer assets sold to CENEX in March 1996. See Note
4 in the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Other income in 1996 included $2 million for interest received from the
Beacon Investment Group associated with the sale of the Coal segment, a $4
million gain on the sale of two corporate airplanes and a $1 million gain on the
sale of an in-house developed business consulting concept, partially offset by
$1 million of expenses for Coal operations and other charges.
MAPCO's effective tax rate for 1996 was 38.6% compared to 37.2% in 1995.
The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to the fact
that 1995 included a full year of depletion expense while 1996 included only a
partial year. The difference between the statutory Federal income tax rate of
35% and the effective tax rate for 1996 and 1995 was due to state income taxes,
adjustments to prior year accruals and depletion expense.
OPERATING PROFIT
1997 RESULTS COMPARED TO 1996
Operating profit by business unit was as follows (in millions):
[Download Table]
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
----------------
1997 1996
---- ----
Natural Gas Liquids......................................... $183 $137
Propane Marketing........................................... (6) 65
Petroleum Refining.......................................... 97 64
Retail Petroleum............................................ 12 30
Other....................................................... (9) --
---- ----
$277 $296
==== ====
26
Natural Gas Liquids Results
Excluding the $66 million gain on the Westpan sale from current year
results, operating profit decreased $20 million. The Westpan operations
generated $18 million of operating profit in 1996 which accounts for most of the
decrease. Operating profit in 1997 was reduced $5 million for additional charges
associated with the Texas explosion litigation (see Note 16 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements).
Propane Marketing Results
Propane Marketing's results in 1996 include a $21 million gain on the sale
of assets to CENEX. Excluding this gain and the profit from the operations
associated with the assets sold from 1996, operating profit was $41 million in
1996. The $47 million decrease in operating profit from 1996 primarily reflects
increased operating, general and administrative and depreciation expense.
Operating expenses increased primarily due to increased salary and wages
associated with acquisitions and growth initiatives during 1997 and increased
supplies, bad debt, environmental and other costs. The increase in Propane
Marketing's general and administrative expenses reflects increased salary,
benefit, travel and outside services costs associated with the acquisitions and
market expansion programs conducted during the year. The increase in
depreciation costs reflect the increase in capital equipment spending and
acquisitions in 1997.
Petroleum Refining Results
Petroleum Refining's operating profit increased $33 million as margins on
processed barrels sold and total sales volumes increased at both the Mid-South
and the Alaska Refineries. Increased operating, general and administrative and
depreciation costs partially offset the favorable impact of increased margins
and volumes.
Retail Petroleum Results
Retail Petroleum's operating profit decreased $18 million. Gasoline gross
profit decreased $3 million as decreased margins more than offset the impact of
increased sales gallons. Diesel gross profit was unchanged as increased margins
offset the impact of lower sales gallons. Merchandise gross profit increased $5
million due to significantly higher sales volumes, with margins decreasing only
slightly from 1996. Total expenses increased $20 million due to increases in
salaries and wages, benefits, advertising, professional services and
environmental costs resulting from the increased store count from the EZ-Serve
acquisition, and increased per store expenses associated with the implementation
of strategic growth initiatives.
Other Results
FleetOne's operating loss in 1997 was $7 million which included a $3
million charge associated with the termination of the Fuelman franchise, $1
million for software development fees and $3 million of other start-up costs.
TouchStar's operating loss of $2 million included operating profit of $1 million
by ACS Data Ltd., offset by $3 million of operating losses, primarily due to
start-up costs by Espagas and Clean Fuel Technologies.
1996 RESULTS COMPARED TO 1995
Operating profit by business unit was as follows (in millions):
[Download Table]
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
----------------
1996 1995
---- ----
Natural Gas Liquids......................................... $137 $104
Propane Marketing........................................... 65 35
Petroleum Refining.......................................... 64 36
Retail Petroleum............................................ 30 13
---- ----
$296 $188
==== ====
27
Natural Gas Liquids Results
The $33 million increase in operating profit was primarily attributable to
increased pipeline profits. Pipeline revenues increased substantially over 1995
due to additional volumes from the completion of the Four Corners loop project
and because ethane recoveries and shipments to Gulf Coast destinations were
strong all year. Pipeline revenues and operating profit in 1995 were adversely
affected by lower demethanized mix shipments created by low ethane prices on the
Gulf Coast.
Propane Marketing Results
The gain on sale of assets to CENEX accounts for $21 million of the $30
million operating profit increase. Excluding the CENEX gain and the operating
profit associated with these operations, operating profit increased $15 million.
This improvement resulted from the increase in home heating and agricultural
propane sales caused by colder-than-normal weather and a strong crop drying
season. In addition, wholesale profits increased primarily because of increased
margins which resulted primarily from higher product sales prices.
Petroleum Refining
The $28 million operating profit increase primarily reflects increased
profits at the Memphis refinery. Profits at the Memphis Refinery increased $33
million as crude throughput increased 24%, total barrels sold increased 23% and
margins improved 17% over 1995. The margin increase was due to higher average
crude costs decreasing more than the decrease in average product sales prices.
The production gains were attributable to capital improvements made to the
refinery during a major turnaround in the spring of 1995. Production was
negatively impacted in 1995 as the Memphis Refinery was shut-down for 4 weeks to
complete the scheduled turnaround. Operating profit at the North Pole Refinery
decreased $5 million as a 9% increase in production was more than offset by
lower margins. Margins decreased 15% from 1995 primarily because of higher crude
costs.
Retail Petroleum
Operating profit increased $17 million primarily due to increased
merchandise profits as both sales volumes and margins improved over 1995.
Merchandise sales increased $16 million and margins improved 3.6% over 1995
which resulted in a $12 million increase in merchandise profits. Profits on
gasoline sales increased $2 million as higher gasoline margins more than offset
the impact of lower sales volumes. Profits on diesel sales increased $1 million
as sales volumes increased 18 million gallons and margins remained essentially
unchanged.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
Estimated liabilities for environmental costs, primarily in the Petroleum
Refining and Retail Petroleum business units, have been determined independently
of any potential claims for recovery. Estimated liabilities for environmental
matters were $24 million and $28 million as of December 31, 1997, and 1996,
respectively. Receivables recorded in connection with laws permitting
reimbursement by the states of certain expenses associated with underground
storage tank containment problems and repairs were $13 million and $15 million
at December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
OTHER MATTERS
Natural Gas Liquids
In November 1995, Mid-America Pipeline, Amoco Pipeline and Navajo Pipeline
announced the formation of a joint venture under the name, Rio Grande Pipeline
Company ("Rio Grande"). Rio Grande, which began operations in the first quarter
of 1997, transport NGLs from Mid-America Pipeline's Hobbs Station in Texas and
other Mid-America Pipeline origins to the Pemex Gas y Petroquimica Basica's
("PEMEX") Mendex terminal in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. The Mexican customer
purchasing the NGLs is
28
PMI Trading Company. Rio Grande is the first pipeline to carry NGL shipments
across the United States/ Mexico border.
Effective January 1, 1997, MAPCO sold its interest in the natural gas
liquids and condensate in the West Panhandle field to Westpan NGL Company, a
subsidiary of MESA Operating Company, for $66 million. Since 1991, MAPCO's West
Panhandle field gas supplier took more than its percentage ownership share of
the field's production. The cumulative effect of this acceleration in gas taken
resulted in the Westpan operations having a 31 billion cubic feet and $30
million over-take position at December 31, 1996. As part of the sale agreement
with Westpan NGL Company, MAPCO was released from its liability for its share of
prior NGL over-takes.
In February 1997, MAPCO Energy L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
wholly-owned by MAPCO ("MAPCO Energy"), formed two joint ventures with Texaco
Exploration and Production Inc. ("Texaco") under the name Discovery Producer
Services, L.L.C. and Discovery Gas Transmission, L.L.C. ("Discovery"), which
owns and operates the Discovery Project. MAPCO Energy and Texaco each own 50% of
the joint ventures and Texaco is the operator. Construction of a 150-mile
natural gas pipeline of varying diameters between 12 inches and 30 inches from
off-shore discovery wells in the Gulf of Mexico to gas processing and
fractionation facilities in southern Louisiana has been completed with first
deliveries of gas from the pipeline in December 1997. The joint venture is
currently in the process of constructing a cryogenic gas processing plant with a
capacity of approximately 600 million cubic feet of gas per day near Larose,
Louisiana, and the expansion of a natural gas liquids fractionator in Paradis,
Louisiana. Both the fractionator and the cryogenic gas processing plant are
expected to be operational by mid-1998.
On April 7, 1992, a liquefied petroleum gas explosion occurred near an
underground salt dome storage facility near Brenham, Texas and owned by an
affiliate of the Company, Seminole Pipeline Company. The matter was investigated
by the National Transportation Safety Board and the Texas Railroad Commission. A
discussion of this matter and its effect on MAPCO is contained in Note 16 to the
consolidated financial statements.
Propane Marketing
In March 1996, Thermogas Company divested its Iowa propane and liquid
fertilizer assets to CENEX Inc. The transaction, which was completed on March
31, 1996, also involved the sale to CENEX Inc. of the remaining Thermogas liquid
fertilizer assets in Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, Ohio and Wisconsin.
Sales and operating revenues for the assets involved in this transaction were
$24 million and $69 million in 1996 and 1995, respectively, and operating profit
was estimated to be $2 million in 1996 and $7 million in 1995.
On January 6, 1997, Propane Marketing announced that, effective January 1,
1997, it had acquired Gas Supply, Inc., an independent wholesale propane company
based in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The acquisition will be used to expand MAPCO's
current wholesale propane marketing activities under the trade name, Gas Supply.
Gas Supply, Inc., marketed approximately 120 million gallons of propane to the
Central and Northeastern United States in 1996. Gas Supply also has related
product sales, a construction company, a 40,000-barrel storage facility and a
rail car and truck terminal in Rosemont, Minnesota.
Other
In September 1996, MAPCO announced the formation of a new company, MAPCO
Canada Energy Inc., with headquarters in Calgary, Alberta. The new company's
mission is to develop strategic business opportunities related to the production
and transportation of natural gas liquids and petroleum products.
On February 4, 1997, MAPCO announced the formation of two new businesses,
InfiNet Solutions, LLC, whose name was changed during 1997 to TouchStar
Technologies L.L.C. ("TouchStar"), and MAPCO Fleet Systems, whose name was
changed during 1997 to FleetOne L.L.C., to expand the Company into mobile
information management systems and bundled services for commercial fleets.
FleetOne's operations include providing fleet operators with motor fuel, data
management and service alternatives. TouchStar's operations
29
include offering information management systems to track operations and control
inventories of energy and other products to improve distribution efficiency and
customer service. New technology in the form of a mobile, hand-held computer
system has been designed to improve record keeping and distribution routing.
MAPCO Coal's wholly-owned subsidiary, Webster County Coal Corporation,
owned and operated the Retiki Coal Mine. The Retiki mine operated under a
cost-plus management fee contract with Big Rivers Electric Corporation ("Big
Rivers") whereby the production from the Retiki mine was sold exclusively to Big
Rivers. In January of 1995, Webster County Coal Corporation entered into a
Partial Settlement Agreement with Big Rivers that closed the Retiki mine.
Webster County Coal Corporation and Big Rivers have litigated the payment
responsibility for certain costs, associated with the operation of the Retiki
mine, which Big Rivers had disputed. The trial was conducted in late 1995.
Before a verdict was rendered, Big Rivers filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection. As part of a plan of reorganization, most of the major creditors
agreed to settle their claims with Big Rivers. MAPCO Equities Inc., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of MAPCO and successor to Webster County Coal
Corporation's interest in the litigation with Big Rivers, also agreed with Big
Rivers to settle its claim for $6 million. Big Rivers' plan of reorganization
(which included this agreed settlement of MAPCO Equities Inc.'s claim) was
confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court on June 9, 1997, subject to a number of
conditions, one of which called for Big Rivers to file for and obtain approval
of its future rates for electricity in Kentucky. That rate filing has been made
and hearings before the Kentucky Public Service Commission have been held, but a
decision is still pending. Pacific Corp. appealed the Bankruptcy Court's
confirmation order, and that appeal is also pending.
In 1996 the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 125, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. The provisions
of SFAS No. 125 require an entity to recognize the financial and servicing
assets it controls and the liabilities it has incurred under the financial
components approach, and distinguishes transfers of financial assets that are
sales from financial assets that are secured borrowings. SFAS No. 125 also
establishes new accounting requirements for pledged collateral. The adoption of
certain provisions of SFAS No. 125 were delayed from 1997 to 1998 by the
issuance of SFAS No. 127, Deferral of the Effective Date of Certain Provisions
of FASB Statement No. 125. The Company will adopt the applicable provisions of
SFAS No. 125 in 1998. The Company does not expect such adoption to have a
material impact on its current results of operations, financial position, or
cash flows.
In 1997 the FASB issued SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income. The
provision of SFAS No. 130 establish new rules for the reporting and display of
comprehensive income and its components in a full set of general-purpose
financial statements. The new rules require that all items that are recognized
under accounting standards as components of comprehensive income be reported in
a financial statement that is displayed with the same prominence as other
financial statements. The Company will adopt SFAS in 1998 and does not expect
that such adoption will have a material impact on results of operations,
financial position or cash flows.
In 1997, the FASB issued SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information. The provisions of SFAS No. 131 require
public companies to use a management approach to determining their operating
segments. This management approach model defines operating segments as
revenue-producing components of the enterprise for which separate financial
information is produced internally and are subject to evaluation by the chief
operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources to segments. SFAS
No. 131 also expands the financial and descriptive information disclosures
relative to the identified operating segments. MAPCO will adopt SFAS in 1998 and
does not expect that such adoption will have a material impact on results of
operations, financial position or cash flows.
In February 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132, Employers' Disclosures
about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits. The provisions of SFAS No. 132
require an entity to revise disclosures about pension and other postretirement
benefit plans. The statement does not change the measurement or recognition of
those plans. It standardizes the disclosure requirements for pensions and other
postretirement benefits to the extent practicable. The statement also requires
additional information on changes in the benefit obligations and fair values of
plan assets that will facilitate financial analysis and eliminates certain
disclosures that are no
30
longer useful. The Company will adopt the applicable provisions of SFAS No. 132
in 1998. The Company does not expect such adoption to have a material impact on
its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
GENERAL MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION
The consolidated financial statements were prepared by management who is
responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These financial statements,
which include amounts based on management's best estimates and judgments, were
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The
consolidated financial statements were independently audited by Deloitte &
Touche LLP, whose report appears on page F-1.
MAPCO maintains a system of internal controls that is designed to provide
reasonable assurance that financial records are accurate, assets are protected,
and consolidated financial statements are stated fairly. This system is
supported by the selection and training of qualified personnel, management
oversight, proper division of responsibilities, the dissemination of written
policies and procedures, and an internal audit program to monitor the system's
effectiveness. Management believes the present system of internal controls
effectively provides the assurances described above.
The Board of Directors, through its Audit Committee, composed of Directors
not employed by the Company, monitors management's financial reporting
responsibilities. The Audit Committee meets periodically with representatives of
management, internal audit, and Deloitte & Touche LLP, to discuss specific
accounting, reporting, internal control, and regulatory compliance matters.
Deloitte & Touche LLP and the Company's internal auditors have unlimited access
to members of the Audit Committee.
Approximately 15% of MAPCO stockholders participate in the voluntary
Dividend Investment Plan whereby cash dividends are used to purchase additional
MAPCO common stock. This service is free, and is administered by the Harris
Trust Company of New York. Stockholders with questions about their accounts
should contact the Harris Bank, Dividend Reinvestment, P.O. Box A-3309, Chicago,
Illinois 60690-9939 or call Harris Bank at (312) 461-2731.
During 1997, MAPCO declared quarterly dividends of $0.15 per share. During
the first three quarters of 1996, MAPCO declared quarterly dividends of $0.125
per share and in the fourth quarter of 1996, increased the dividend to $0.15 per
share. During 1995, MAPCO declared quarterly dividends of $0.125 per share.
Dividends were payable in March, June, September, and December. The annual
dividend in 1997 was $0.60 per share and in 1996 and 1995, the annual dividend
was $0.525 per share and $0.50 per share (as restated for the stock split,
effected in the form of a stock dividend from shares held as treasury stock, in
1996), respectively.
MAPCO common stock is traded on the New York, Chicago, and Pacific Stock
Exchanges under the symbol MDA. MAPCO had 5,319 stockholders of record on
December 31, 1997.
The high and low closing prices of MAPCO common stock on the New York Stock
Exchange during the quarterly periods of 1997 and 1996 (as restated for the 1996
stock split) were as follows:
[Download Table]
1997 1996
---------------- ----------------
QUARTER HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
------- ------ ------ ------ ------
First......................................... $34.25 $31.00 $28.69 $26.69
Second........................................ 32.13 28.88 29.63 27.88
Third......................................... 32.94 29.50 29.81 26.81
Fourth........................................ 46.25 32.13 34.75 29.75
The closing price of MAPCO's common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on
December 31, 1997 was $46.25 and on February 13, 1998 was $52.19.
31
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
The consolidated financial statements of MAPCO Inc., together with the
report thereon of Deloitte & Touche LLP dated January 27, 1998 (February 26,
1998, as to Notes 2 and 16) and the supplementary financial data specified by
Item 302 of Regulation S-K are set forth on pages F-1 through F-28 hereof. See
Item 14 for Index.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
(a) Directors of the Registrant
The Board of Directors is divided into three classes with the term of
office of the Directors of each class ending in different years. The Class I, II
and III Directors are to serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 1998,
1999 and 2000, respectively, or until their successors are elected. There are
currently no vacancies on the Board of Directors.
The following tabulation provides information as to each Director of the
Company.
[Download Table]
DIRECTOR CLASS
-------- -----
Donald L. Mellish, 70....................................... I
Anchorage, Alaska. Director since June 1981. Chairman of
the Executive Committee since 1985 and a Director of
National Bancorp of Alaska, Inc. since 1964.
Robert L. Parker, 74........................................ I
Tulsa, Oklahoma. Director since May 1986. Chairman of the
Board of Parker Drilling Company, an international oil and
gas drilling company. Presently, a Director of Bank of
Oklahoma Financial Corporation, Clayton Williams Energy,
Inc., Norwest Bank of Texas (Kerrville), Southern
Methodist University, St. Francis Hospital (Chairman) and
the Development Board of Texas University.
James E. Barnes, 64......................................... II
Tulsa, Oklahoma. Director, Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since
September, 1995. Director, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company from December 1991 to
September 1995. Director, Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from May 1986
to December 1991. Director, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company from February 1984 to May 1986.
Advisory, non-voting Director, Senior Executive Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company from
June 1983 to February 1984. Presently a Director of Bank
of Oklahoma Financial Corporation, SBC Communications Inc.
and Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc.
Harry A. Fischer, Jr., 71................................... II
Glenview, Illinois. Director since May 1986. Chairman
since January 1988, Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer from November 1985 to January 1988, and
President and Chief Executive Officer from November 1980
to November 1985 of Daubert Industries, Inc., a
manufacturer of chemically treated papers, coatings, rust
and corrosion prevention chemicals, adhesives, sealants
and masking tape products. Formerly a Director of Lee
Enterprises, Incorporated.
32
[Download Table]
DIRECTOR CLASS
-------- -----
Frank T. MacInnis, 51....................................... II
Norwalk, Connecticut. Director since May 1996. Chairman of
the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of EMCOR
Group, Inc., one of the world's largest electrical and
mechanical construction groups. Formerly Chairman of the
Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Comstock
Group, Inc., a nationwide electrical contracting company
(1989 -- 1994). Presently Chairman of the Board of ComNet
Communications, Inc. and a Director of PORTEC, Inc.
Samuel F. Segnar, 70........................................ II
Houston, Texas. Director since September, 1989. Retired
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ENRON Corporation;
Formerly Chairman of the Board of Collecting Bank, N.A.,
Houston and Vista Chemical Co. (1986-1988). Presently a
Director of Textron, Inc., Seagull Energy Corporation,
Gulf States Utilities Company and serves on the Advisory
Board of Pilko & Associates and the National Advisory
Board of First Commercial Bank; Owner, Sam F. Segnar
Interests, a company involved in construction, development
and heavy equipment businesses.
Donald Paul Hodel, 62....................................... III
Chesapeake, Virginia. Director since September, 1990.
Presently President of the Christian Coalition, a grass
roots voter education organization and Managing Director
of Summit Group International Ltd. and Summit Energy
Group, an energy and natural resources consulting firm;
Director of Columbia Energy Group.
Malcolm T. Hopkins, 69...................................... III
Asheville, North Carolina. Director since May 1986.
Retired October 1984 as Vice Chairman and Chief Financial
Officer, St. Regis Corporation, a diversified,
multi-national forest products company, that also had
insurance, oil and gas and chemical operations. Presently
a private investor and a Director of Columbia Energy
Group, Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc., State Street
Research and Management Company, EMCOR Group Inc., and
U.S. Home Corporation.
Frank A. McPherson, 64...................................... III
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Director since 1997. Served as
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
Kerr-McGee Corp., from May 1983 until his retirement on
February 1997; Presently Director of Tri-Continental
Corporation, Seligman Quality Fund, Inc., Seligman Select
Municipal Fund, Inc., Seligman Group of Mutual Funds,
Kimberly-Clark Corp., and Bank of Oklahoma Financial
Corporation; Member of the Board of Trustees of the
Oklahoma Nature Conservancy, Southwest Region Board of
Trustees of the Boys and Girls Clubs of America and
President of the Oklahoma Foundation for Excellence in
Education.
John L. Whitmire, 57........................................ III
Houston, Texas. Director since 1997. Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer of Union Texas Petroleum
Holdings, Inc. since January 1996; Executive Vice
President -- Worldwide Exploration and Production from
January 1994 to January 1996 and Senior Vice President --
Worldwide Exploration and Production from December 1991 to
January 1994 for Phillips Petroleum Company; Presently
Director of the American Petroleum Institute and the
National Audubon Society.
33
(b) Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following tabulation provides information as to each executive officer
of MAPCO. Unless otherwise indicated, such persons have held their respective
principal occupations stated therein for more than five years.
[Enlarge/Download Table]
YEAR FIRST
POSITIONS AND OFFICES BECAME
NAME AGE PRESENTLY HELD WITH REGISTRANT OFFICER
---- --- ------------------------------ ----------
James E. Barnes................................. 64 Chairman of the Board, President 1983
and Chief Executive Officer
Philip W. Baxter................................ 49 Executive Vice President and Chief 1985
Financial Officer
Robert G. Sachse................................ 50 Executive Vice President and Chief 1993
Operating Officer
David W. Bowman................................. 57 Senior Vice President, General 1987
Counsel and Secretary
Douglas H. Rinke................................ 51 Senior Vice President -- Human 1996
Resources
Peter A. Fasullo................................ 45 Vice President, Business 1997
Development and Strategic Planning
Gordon E. Schaechterle, Jr...................... 43 Vice President, Controller and Tax 1994
Counsel
Donald R. Wellendorf............................ 45 Vice President, Treasurer and 1994
Investor Relations
Each of the executive officers named above are elected annually by the
directors of MAPCO and serve at the directors' discretion. Each individual named
above, other than Mr. Fasullo, has been an officer or employee of MAPCO for at
least the past five years. Prior to his employment with MAPCO, from July of 1996
to August of 1997, Mr. Fasullo was Senior Vice-President of Corporate
Development of Valero Energy Corp. Prior to that, from October of 1991 to July
of 1996, Mr. Fasullo was Senior Vice President of Planning and Development for
Valero Natural Gas Company.
There are no family relationships between or among any of the above-named
persons or between or among any of the above-named persons and any directors of
MAPCO.
34
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The following table sets forth the total compensation paid or accrued by
the Company for services provided during the fiscal years ended December 31,
1997, 1996 and 1995 to the Chief Executive Officer and the four other most
highly compensated executive officers and one individual who ceased to be an
executive officer of the Company in 1997 but whose compensation would have
placed him in this group (the "named Executive Officers").
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
[Enlarge/Download Table]
ANNUAL COMPENSATION LONG-TERM COMPENSATION AWARDS
---------------------------- -----------------------------------------
AWARDS
----------------------------
AWARDS
RESTRICTED RESTRICTED SECURITIES ALL OTHER
NAME AND STOCK STOCK UNDERLYING COMPENSATION
PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY($) BONUS($) AWARDS($) AWARD($)(1) OPTIONS(#)(2) ($)(3)(4)
------------------ ---- --------- --------- ---------- ------------ ------------- ------------
James E. Barnes 1997 824,167 1,250,000 0 818,409 27,465,599
Chairman of the Board, 1996 795,000 1,590,000 0 200,000 48,605
President & CEO 1995 795,000 0 0 280,000 48,154
Robert G. Sachse 1997 320,833 347,700 462,500 157,864 7,727,573
Executive Vice President, COO 1996 260,917 500,000 0 127,812 18,605
1995 233,000 0 0 68,000 11,429
Philip W. Baxter 1997 280,833 301,340 462,500 161,109 7,495,677
Executive Vice President, CFO 1996 236,666 450,000 0 150,119 17,308
1995 188,000 0 0 54,918 9,901
David W. Bowman 1997 253,000 217,960 0 95,839 3,899,053
Senior Vice President, 1996 249,667 350,000 0 64,618 17,684
General Counsel & Secretary 1995 249,000 0 0 60,000 17,011
Douglas H. Rinke 1997 177,042 155,000 92,500 33,056 2,077,802
Senior Vice President, 1996 141,333 162,000 0 39,092 14,263
Human Resources 1995 131,500 0 0 11,032 9,829
Jack D. Maynard 1997 232,000 125,000 0 80,205 3,933,579
Vice President 1996 226,750 300,000 0 64,767 17,068
1995 209,333 0 0 52,000 14,695
---------------
(1) As a result of significant increases in job responsibilities, restricted
shares were granted to certain key employees including Messrs. Sachse,
Baxter and Rinke. The value of the restricted shares was calculated using
the composite NYSE closing price on December 31, 1997 of $46.25. Dividends
are paid on restricted shares in the same manner as the Company's issued and
outstanding shares. If the merger with Williams is consummated, restricted
shares will vest immediately.
(2) Under the 1989 Stock Incentive Plan, MAPCO has a replacement option feature
providing for additional options to restore the potential future
appreciation of any outstanding shares actually used to exercise an option,
as well as shares forfeited for tax withholding ("Replacement Option").
Replacement Options are granted only in connection with stock-for-stock
exchanges where an optionee exercises vested stock options with already
owned stock of the Company. The Replacement Option which is received by the
optionee is equal to the number of shares used to exercise the original
options plus those shares forfeited for tax withholding. Replacement Options
have terms substantially similar to the original option, including the same
expiration date, except they have an exercise price per share equal to the
fair market value of a share of common stock on the date the Replacement
Option is granted. Replacement Options are not exercisable for at least six
months from the date of grant for those granted prior to January 22, 1992
and twelve months for those granted on and after January 22, 1992. By
recapturing the potential for future appreciation through the Replacement
Options, key management is provided with the incentive to acquire shares
rather than hold options until the end of the exercise period. Replacement
Options are granted only to the extent existing shares held by the employee
are exchanged to exercise options and accordingly, the total number of
options granted never exceeds shareholder approved limits under the
35
stock option plans. The CEO has set stock ownership targets for each key
member of management including the named Executive Officers. The Replacement
Option program has encouraged stock option exercises and helped to increase
stock ownership of key management.
(3) All Other Compensation includes Company matching contributions to the MAPCO
Inc. and Subsidiaries Profit Sharing and Savings Plan ("PSSP") and
compensation paid to or on behalf of the named Executive Officers
participating in the Long-term Investment Savings Plan ("LISP"), a
non-qualified defined contribution plan. Company matching contributions to
the PSSP for 1997 on behalf of Messrs. Barnes, Sachse, Baxter, Bowman, Rinke
and Maynard were $53,891, $26,915, $25,406, $23,469, $21,075 and $22,520,
respectively. The LISP was terminated and all but a residual amount of the
account balances were paid out as compensation to Messrs. Barnes, Sachse,
Baxter, Bowman, Rinke and Maynard in the amount of $288,812, $22,885,
$28,715, $38,858, $2,633 and $50,550, respectively in 1997. In 1998, in
connection with the termination of the LISP, residual account balances were
paid as compensation to Messrs. Barnes, Sachse, Baxter, Bowman, Rinke and
Maynard in the amount of $17,614, $955, $1,532, $1,644, $99 and $2,476,
respectively.
(4) Messrs. Barnes, Sachse, Baxter, Bowman, Rinke and Maynard each received lump
sum Non-Compete Agreement payments of $17,380,000, $5,150,000, $5,150,000,
$1,625,000, $860,000, $1,865,000, respectively. Messrs. Barnes, Sachse,
Baxter, Bowman, Rinke and Maynard received a lump sum Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan ("SERP") payment of $3,058,285, $358,650, $341,528,
$354,130, $137,656, $358,394, respectively. Mr. Barnes also received a lump
sum payment of $2,912,130 representing the benefit accrued through 1997
pursuant to a Supplemental Retirement Agreement ("SRA") as more fully
described under the Pension Plan section. Messrs. Barnes, Sachse, Baxter,
Bowman, Rinke and Maynard received a lump sum vacation benefit payment of
$67,270, $26,923, $33,183, $22,253, $16,671, $16,139, respectively. In the
event that Messrs. Barnes, Sachse, Baxter, Bowman, Rinke and Maynard would
not be employed after the potential merger in 1998 with Williams, he would
receive a lump sum severance payment of $3,687,597, $2,141,245, $1,915,313,
$1,833,699, $1,039,668, $1,618,500, respectively.
36
The following table contains information concerning the grant of stock
options during fiscal year 1997 to the named Executive Officers.
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
[Enlarge/Download Table]
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS
-------------------------------------------------------
% OF
TOTAL
NUMBER OF OPTIONS GRANT DATE VALUE
SECURITIES GRANTED TO ----------------
OPTIONS EMPLOYEES PRICE EXPIRATION PRESENT VALUE
NAME GRANTED(#)(1) IN 1997 ($/SHARE) DATE(2) ($)(3)
---- ------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------------
James E. Barnes........ 300,000 8.1% 31.8125 9/22/07 4,540,943
220,000 5.9% 33.3750 1/27/07 3,558,007
23,863 0.6% 43.0625 1/23/01 354,381
22,105 0.6% 43.0625 2/24/99 328,274
86,139 2.3% 43.0625 1/22/02 1,279,220
22,618 0.6% 43.0625 2/24/99 335,892
15,652 0.4% 43.0625 1/30/00 232,442
28,855 0.8% 43.0625 2/2/03 428,516
22,034 0.6% 43.0625 2/24/99 327,219
15,397 0.4% 43.0625 1/30/00 228,655
22,342 0.6% 43.0625 1/23/01 331,793
16,167 0.4% 43.0625 1/30/00 240,090
23,237 0.6% 43.0625 1/23/01 345,085
Robert G. Sachse....... 130,000 3.5% 31.8125 9/22/07 1,967,742
8,933 0.2% 43.0000 1/22/02 133,823
5,062 0.1% 43.0000 2/2/03 75,832
1,989 0.1% 43.0000 2/24/99 29,797
2,039 0.1% 43.0000 2/24/99 30,546
3,018 0.1% 43.0000 1/30/00 45,212
4,157 0.1% 43.0000 1/23/01 62,275
2,160 0.1% 43.0000 1/23/01 32,358
121 0.0% 43.0000 2/24/99 1,813
385 0.0% 33.7500 2/2/03 4,551
Philip W. Baxter....... 130,000 3.5% 31.8125 9/22/07 1,967,742
5,383 0.1% 43.0000 2/2/03 80,641
5,255 0.1% 43.0000 1/22/02 78,724
2,144 0.1% 43.0000 2/24/99 32,119
2,240 0.1% 43.0000 1/23/01 33,557
2,630 0.1% 43.0000 1/22/02 39,399
4,362 0.1% 43.0000 1/23/01 65,346
3,046 0.1% 43.0000 1/30/00 45,631
4,349 0.1% 43.0000 2/24/99 65,151
312 0.0% 43.0000 2/24/99 4,674
1,388 0.0% 43.0000 1/30/00 20,793
David W. Bowman........ 18,000 0.5% 31.8125 9/22/07 272,456
35,000 0.9% 33.3750 1/27/07 566,045
21,733 0.6% 43.7500 1/22/02 327,902
4,928 0.1% 43.7500 2/24/99 74,352
6,259 0.2% 43.7500 1/23/01 94,434
6,146 0.2% 43.7500 1/23/01 92,729
3,773 0.1% 43.7500 1/30/00 56,926
Douglas H. Rinke....... 17,000 0.5% 31.8125 9/22/07 257,320
496 0.0% 43.5625 2/24/99 7,451
37
[Enlarge/Download Table]
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS
-------------------------------------------------------
% OF
TOTAL
NUMBER OF OPTIONS GRANT DATE VALUE
SECURITIES GRANTED TO ----------------
OPTIONS EMPLOYEES PRICE EXPIRATION PRESENT VALUE
NAME GRANTED(#)(1) IN 1997 ($/SHARE) DATE(2) ($)(3)
---- ------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------------
1,625 0.0% 43.5625 1/22/02 24,413
875 0.0% 43.5625 1/30/00 13,145
420 0.0% 43.5625 1/23/01 6,310
1,349 0.0% 32.5000 2/24/99 15,486
2,233 0.1% 32.5000 2/2/03 25,633
2,112 0.1% 32.5000 2/24/99 24,244
770 0.0% 32.5000 2/24/99 8,839
2,502 0.1% 32.5000 1/30/00 28,721
3,674 0.1% 32.5000 1/23/01 42,175
Jack D. Maynard........ 15,000 0.4% 31.8125 9/22/07 227,046
35,000 0.9% 33.3750 1/27/07 566,045
4,803 0.1% 42.6250 1/23/01 70,603
2,433 0.1% 42.6250 2/24/99 35,765
4,930 0.1% 43.0000 1/23/01 73,855
1,782 0.0% 43.0000 1/30/00 26,696
1,658 0.0% 43.0000 1/30/00 24,838
2,357 0.1% 43.0000 2/24/99 35,310
5,864 0.2% 43.1250 2/2/03 87,962
6,378 0.2% 43.1250 1/22/02 95,672
---------------
(1) The number of securities shown in bold faced type and to the left of the
Options Granted column for each named Executive Officer denotes original
grants made by the Compensation Committee which become exercisable in
one-third increments over years two, three and four of the option.
(2) Original grants made by the Compensation Committee expire ten (10) years
from the grant date. Replacement Options have the same expiration date as
the original options they have replaced. Replacement Options are denoted by
indented lines in the chart. See Footnote 2 under the Summary Compensation
Table for additional information regarding Replacement Options.
(3) In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules, the
Black-Scholes option pricing model was chosen to estimate the grant date
present value of the options set forth in this table. The Company's use of
this model should not be construed as an endorsement of its accuracy at
valuing options. All stock option valuation models, including the
Black-Scholes model, require a prediction about the future movement of the
stock price. The following assumptions were made for purposes of calculating
the Grant Date Present Value: for all original grants the option term is
assumed to be three years after vesting, interest rates of 6.08% to 6.41%,
volatility of 29.52% calculated by using daily stock prices for the calendar
year 1997, and a dividend yield between 1.80% to 1.89% per share. The
following assumptions were made for purposes of calculating the Grant Date
Present Value for all Replacement Options: the option term is assumed to be
three years after vesting, interest rates of 5.71% to 6.16%, volatility of
29.52% calculated by using daily stock prices for the calendar year 1997,
and a dividend yield between 1.37% and 1.85% per share. The real value of
the options in this table depends upon the actual performance of the
Company's stock during the applicable period.
38
The following table contains information concerning aggregated stock option
exercises during 1997 by the named Executive Officers.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
[Enlarge/Download Table]
NUMBER OF VALUE OF
SECURITIES UNEXERCISED
UNDERLYING IN-THE-MONEY
NUMBER OF UNEXERCISED OPTIONS AT
SECURITIES OPTIONS AT FY-END($)
UNDERLYING FY-END(#) (3)
OPTIONS VALUE EXERCISABLE/ EXERCISABLE/
NAME EXERCISED(#)(1) REALIZED($)(2) UNEXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
---- --------------- -------------- ------------- --------------
James E. Barnes.................... 540,396 7,452,625 50,000/ 987,500/
1,357,075 17,969,207
Robert G. Sachse................... 51,506 622,803 11,333/ 223,827/
350,530 5,487,147
Philip W. Baxter................... 44,489 498,846 10,000/ 197,500/
339,775 5,227,757
David W. Bowman.................... 119,378 1,791,325 10,000/ 197,500/
215,839 3,014,473
Douglas H. Rinke................... 34,616 277,568 0/ 0/
81,722 1,315,721
Jack D. Maynard.................... 77,377 843,253 9,333/ 184,327/
184,205 2,674,037
---------------
(1) Includes shares forfeited for the named Executive Officer's state and
federal tax withholding obligations and shares tendered in payment of the
option exercise prices.
(2) Includes value of shares forfeited by the named Executive Officer for state
and federal tax withholding obligations.
(3) The value of the unexercised in-the-money options was calculated using the
composite NYSE closing price on December 31, 1997 of $46.25.
PENSION PLAN
The pension plan, in which all eligible employees, including Executive
Officers, participate, does not require or permit employees to make
contributions. Contributions to the pension plan in respect of any person are
not and cannot be separately or individually calculated.
PENSION TABLE -- ANNUAL BENEFIT PAYABLE AT NORMAL RETIREMENT AGE
[Enlarge/Download Table]
AVERAGE YEARS OF SERVICE
ANNUAL -------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPENSATION 10 15 20 25 30 35
------------ -------- -------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------
$ 100,000 ................. $ 17,477 $ 26,215 $ 34,953 $ 43,692 $ 52,430 $ 61,168
$ 250,000 ................. 46,727 70,090 93,453 116,817 140,180 163,543
$ 500,000 ................. 95,477 143,215 190,953 238,692 286,430 334,168
$1,000,000 ................. 192,977 289,465 385,953 482,442 578,930 675,418
$1,250,000 ................. 241,727 362,590 483,453 604,317 725,180 846,043
$1,500,000 ................. 290,477 435,715 580,953 726,192 871,430 1,016,668
$1,750,000 ................. 339,227 508,840 678,453 848,067 1,017,680 1,187,293
$2,000,000 ................. 387,977 581,965 775,953 969,942 1,163,930 1,357,918
39
The Pension Table above shows approximate total retirement benefits
(expressed as an annual straight-life annuity) based on employment with the
Company for an employee covered by the qualified and non-qualified retirement
plans. "Average annual compensation" is determined with reference to the base
salary and bonus compensation of the named Executive Officers disclosed in the
Summary Compensation Table above, except as described below for Mr. Barnes.
Average annual compensation levels are the average base salary and bonus
compensation for the three highest consecutive years of the 10 years immediately
before retirement date. The normal retirement date is at age 65, 66 or 67,
depending upon the participant's birth year. The benefit amounts listed in the
table are not subject to reduction for Social Security benefits or on any other
basis except as noted below.
At December 31, 1997, Messrs. Barnes, Sachse, Baxter, Bowman, Rinke and
Maynard, were credited with 14.58, 15.93, 18.18, 10.72, 17.41 and 16.83 years of
service, respectively. In addition, Mr. Barnes is, pursuant to a separate
retirement agreement, credited with additional service equal to service earned
with his prior employer (26 years). Such service is applied with reference to a
modified base salary and bonus compensation at the Company which reflects only
50% of his promotion pay increases and bonus compensation. This additional
retirement benefit is reduced by the retirement benefit earned by Mr. Barnes at
his prior employer.
EMPLOYMENT CONTINUATION AGREEMENTS
The Company has entered into Employment Continuation Agreements (the
"Agreements") with seven (7) of its Executive Officers (the "Officers"),
including Messrs. Barnes, Sachse, Baxter, Bowman, Rinke and Maynard, which were
amended in November, 1997.
Agreements similar to the Agreements have been in effect since prior to
December 31, 1989. The Agreements were generally automatically extended on
January 1, 1998, and will continue to automatically extend each January 1
thereafter unless, not later than October 1 of the preceding year, the Company
shall have given notice that it does not wish to extend the Agreement and
provided that if a Change in Control (as defined below) occurs, the Agreements
shall automatically continue for twenty-four months beyond the month in which
such Change in Control occurred. Under each Agreement, the Officer is obligated
to remain in the Company's employ for the earliest of (a) nine months following
the occurrence of a Potential Change in Control, (b) the date of a Change in
Control, (c) the date the Officer terminates his employment by reason of Death,
Disability or Retirement, or (d) the termination by the Company of the Officer's
employment. The proposed merger between the Company and Williams will constitute
a Change of Control for purposes of the Agreements.
For purposes of the Agreements, a "Change in Control" shall be deemed to
have occurred if (i) any "person," as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and
14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")
(other than the Company, any trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under
an employee benefit plan of the Company, or any corporation owned, directly or
indirectly, by the stockholders of the Company in substantially the same
proportion as their ownership of stock of the Company), is or becomes the
"beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly
or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 25% or more of the
combined voting power of the Company's then outstanding securities eligible to
vote; or (ii) during any period of two consecutive years (not including any
period prior to the execution of the Agreement), individuals who at the
beginning of such period constitute the Board, and any new director (other than
a director designated by a person who has entered into an agreement with the
Company to effect a transaction described in clause (i), (ii) or (iv) of this
Paragraph) whose election by the Board or nomination for election by the
Company's stockholders was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds ( 2/3) of
the directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of
the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so
approved (hereinafter referred to as "Continuing Directors"), cease for any
reason to constitute at least a majority thereof; or (iii) the stockholders of
the Company approve a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other
corporation, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the
voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto
continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted
into
40
voting securities of the surviving entity) in combination with the ownership of
any trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan
of the Company, more than 75% of the combined voting power of the voting
securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after
such merger or consolidation; provided, however, that a merger or consolidation
effected to implement a recapitalization of the Company (or similar transaction)
in which no "person" (as hereinabove defined) acquires more than 50% of the
combined voting power of the Company's then outstanding securities shall not
constitute a Change in Control of the Company; or (iv) the stockholders of the
Company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the Company or an agreement
for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the
Company's assets (or any transaction having a similar effect).
For purposes of the Agreements, a "Potential Change in Control" shall be
deemed to have occurred if (i) the Company enters into an agreement, the
consummation of which would result in the occurrence of a Change in Control;
(ii) any person (including the Company) publicly announces an intention to take
or to consider taking actions which if consummated would constitute a Change in
Control; or (iii) any person other than a trustee or other fiduciary holding
securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company (or a corporation
owned, directly or indirectly by the stockholders of the Company in
substantially the same proportion as their ownership of stock of the Company),
who is or becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of
the corporation representing 10% or more of the combined voting power of the
Company's then outstanding securities, increases such person's beneficial
ownership of such securities by 5% or more over the percentage so owned by such
person on the date hereof; or (iv) the Board of Directors of the Company adopts
a resolution to the effect that, for purposes of the Agreement, a Potential
Change in Control has occurred.
If, within three (3) years following a Change in Control, an Officer's
employment is terminated by the Company (other than for cause, as defined in the
Agreements, or on account of the Officer's Death, or Disability) or by the
Officer for other than Good Reason as defined in the Agreement, the Company will
pay the Officer a single sum severance payment equal to the product of a
specified multiple of the sum of (i) the Officer's then current annual salary,
plus (ii) the highest annual incentive compensation payment for the current
calendar year or any of the last three (3) years, plus (iii) awards paid under
the Company's Performance Bonus Plan or any successor thereto. The multiple
ranges from one and one-half times (in the case of Mr. Barnes) to three times in
the case of other Officers (including Mr. Bowman and Mr. Rinke).
In addition, for a period equivalent to the period for which severance is
payable (e.g., eighteen months for Mr. Barnes, thirty months for Messrs. Baxter
and Sachse, and thirty-six months for Messrs. Bowman and Rinke), the Company
shall provide the Officer with benefits substantially similar to those which the
Officer was receiving or entitled to receive under the Company's life,
disability, accident and group health insurance plans or any similar plans in
which the Officer was participating immediately prior to the date of termination
at a cost to the Officer which is no greater than that cost to the Officer in
effect at the date of termination.
The Company has also agreed to pay the Officer an additional amount
("Gross-Up Payment") such that the net amount retained by the Officer upon the
payments provided under the Agreement, after deduction of federal, state and
local income tax and any tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, shall be equal to the Severance Payment. The Company
has also agreed to pay all reasonable and appropriate legal fees and expenses
incurred by the Officer as a result of the Officer's qualifying termination
(including all such fees and expenses, if any, reasonably incurred in contesting
or disputing by arbitration or otherwise, any such termination or in seeking to
obtain or enforce any right or benefit provided by the Agreement or in
connection with any tax audit or proceeding to the extent attributable to the
application of Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
(the "Code"), to any payment or benefit provided under the Agreement).
41
COMPENSATION OF THE BOARD
Employee directors are not compensated for services as a director.
Non-employee directors ("Outside Directors") receive an annual retainer of
$25,000 and, with the exception of director Donald L. Mellish, a fee of $1,000
for attendance at each Board or Committee meeting. Because Mr. Mellish routinely
travels to Board or Committee meetings from outside the contiguous 48 states, he
receives double the Board or Committee meeting attendance fee of $1,000;
provided, however, if the Board and Committee meetings are held jointly, only
his Board attendance fee is doubled. The Audit and Compensation Committee
Chairmen receive additional annual compensation of $4,000 and the Governance and
Finance Committee Chairmen receive annual compensation of $3,000 in addition to
Committee attendance fees. The Company also reimburses its Directors for travel,
lodging and related expenses incurred in attending Board and Committee meetings
and provides each Outside Director with $100,000 in life insurance benefits and
$250,000 in accidental death and dismemberment insurance benefits.
Outside Directors whose service began prior to January 1, 1996 are eligible
to participate in the 1986 Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the
"Director Retirement Plan"). Under the Director Retirement Plan, an Outside
Director who has completed at least five years of service as a member of the
Board of Directors and retires from the Board after attaining age 70 will
receive a benefit for life equal to the annual retainer fee payable to an
Outside Director at the time of his retirement. An Outside Director who has not
attained age 70 at the time he leaves the Board, but who has completed at least
five years of service as a member of the Board, will generally receive a benefit
equal to the annual retainer fee then payable to an Outside Director for the
lesser of (i) the number of years during which the Outside Director served as a
member of the Board or (ii) ten years. Upon the occurrence of a Change in
Control (as defined in the Employment Continuation Agreements for executive
officers described above), all Outside Directors will be entitled to receive a
benefit under such plan, regardless of the length of Board membership. Such
benefit will be equal to the annual retainer fee then payable to an Outside
Director during his lifetime for a period equal to the greater of (i) the number
of years during which the Outside Director served as a member of the Board or
(ii) ten years.
Each Outside Director will receive an immediately exercisable option having
a ten-year term to purchase 2,000 shares of the Company's common stock on the
later of the first business day following the annual meeting of the Company's
Stockholders or June 1 and shall have an option price equal to the fair market
value of a share of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. Such
options were granted to all Outside Directors then in office at the date of the
annual meeting of shareholders in 1997, but no such options will be granted if
the Williams Merger is consummated.
In January 1996, the Company adopted the MAPCO Inc. Outside Director
Phantom Stock Plan (the "Phantom Plan"), effective as of January 1, 1996. All
Outside Directors are eligible to participate in the Phantom Plan. Under the
Phantom Plan, on June 1 of each year, each Outside Director of the Company will
receive "phantom" shares of the Company's common stock ("Phantom Stock") equal
to one-half of the amount of the then current Annual Retainer. In addition, an
Outside Director may elect to have all or a part of the Annual Retainer Fee
payable by the Company converted to Phantom Stock. The shares held as Phantom
Stock are adjusted for cash dividends, stock dividends, stock splits, mergers
and other changes in capitalization of the Company.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
(a) Common Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
The following table shows information concerning beneficial ownership of
the Company's common stock by all Directors and by the Company's Chief Executive
Officer, each of the Company's four other most highly compensated executive
officers for 1997 (the "named Executive Officers") and all Directors and
Executive Officers as a group. In 1994, the Board reviewed the policy-making
functions of the Company's officers and redefined which officers would be
included as Executive Officers (those officers with reporting responsibilities
under Section 16 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). As a
result of this and subsequent reviews, the Board has specifically designated the
Chairman, all Executive Vice Presidents, all Senior Vice
42
Presidents, the Vice President, Business Development and Strategic Planning, the
Vice President, Controller and Tax Counsel, and the Vice President, Treasurer
and Investor Relations of the Company as Executive Officers. The persons named
below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common
stock owned by them, unless otherwise noted.
[Enlarge/Download Table]
NUMBER OF SHARES OF
COMMON STOCK
BENEFICIALLY OWNED
DIRECTOR OR DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY PERCENT
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER ON FEBRUARY 16, 1998 OF CLASS
----------------------- ---------------------- --------
Donald L. Mellish........................................ 47,000(3) (1)
Robert L. Parker......................................... 32,800(3) (1)
James E. Barnes.......................................... 685,491(2) 1.6%
Harry A. Fischer, Jr..................................... 32,000(3) (1)
Frank T. MacInnis........................................ 5,000(3) (1)
Samuel F. Segnar......................................... 30,000(3) (1)
Malcolm T. Hopkins....................................... 35,500(3) (1)
Donald Paul Hodel........................................ 24,200(3)(4) (1)
Frank A. McPherson....................................... 2,000 (1)
John L. Whitmire......................................... 2,000 (1)
Robert G. Sachse......................................... 66,951(2) (1)
Philip W. Baxter......................................... 70,287(2) (1)
David W. Bowman.......................................... 143,604(2) (1)
Douglas H. Rinke......................................... 34,489(2) (1)
Jack D. Maynard.......................................... 58,432(2) (1)
--------- ---
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group (18
persons)............................................... 1,331,095(2)(3) 2.7%
---------------
(1) Does not exceed one percent.
(2) Includes options for the Company's common stock that may be exercised
within 60 days by Messrs. Barnes (132,667), Sachse (27,051), Baxter
(14,667), Bowman (30,000), Maynard, (25,333), Rinke (5,067) and by all
Executive Officers and Directors as a group (428,271), excluding any
options that will become exercisable upon shareholder approval of the
Williams Merger. Also includes shares of the Company's Common Stock that
are allocated as of December 31, 1997 under the MAPCO Inc. & Subsidiaries
Profit Sharing and Savings Plan (Mr. Barnes 5,097 shares, Mr. Sachse 4,271
shares, Mr. Baxter 4,312 shares, Mr. Bowman 9,955 shares, Mr. Maynard 4,521
shares, and Mr. Rinke 3,649 shares).
(3) Includes options for the Company's common stock that may be exercised
within 60 days by all non-employee Directors under the 1989 Outside
Directors Stock Option Plan and includes shares held in the dividend
reinvestment plan of MAPCO Inc. Fractional shares held in the dividend
reinvestment plan have been rounded.
(4) Includes 200 shares held by spouse.
43
(b) Other Ownership of MAPCO Common Stock
According to information from Schedule 13G filings as of February 18, 1998,
the following table lists the Stockholders known to the Company to be beneficial
holders of more than five percent of the outstanding common stock of the
Company:
[Enlarge/Download Table]
NAME & ADDRESS OF AMOUNT & NATURE OF PERCENT
BENEFICIAL OWNER BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF CLASS
----------------- -------------------- --------
Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. Inc.......................... 5,247,659(1) 9.6%
One State Street Plaza
New York, NY 10004
Vanguard/Windsor Funds, Inc............................. 4,532,400(2) 8.26%
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, Inc................ 5,066,600(3) 9.2%
One McKinney Plaza
3232 McKinney Avenue, 15th Floor
Dallas, TX 75204-2429
SASCO Capital, Inc...................................... 3,324,000(4) 6.1%
10 SASCO Hill Road
Fairfield, CT 06430
MacKay-Shields.......................................... 3,164,080(5) 5.8%
9 West 57th Street
New York, New York 10019
---------------
(1) Schedule 13-G filed by Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., showing beneficial
ownership as of February 4, 1998; sole power to vote or direct the vote of
3,038,844 shares and shared power to vote or to direct the vote of 564,856
shares; sole dispositive power of 5,247,659 shares and no shared
dispositive power.
(2) Beneficial ownership as of February 9, 1998; sole power to vote or to
direct the vote of 4,532,400 shares and no shared voting power; shared
power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of 4,532,400 shares and no
sole dispositive power.
(3) Schedule 13-G filed by Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, Inc., showing
beneficial ownership as of February 12, 1998; sole power to vote or direct
the vote of 233,000 shares and shared power to vote or to direct the vote
of 4,833,600 shares; sole dispositive power of 5,066,600 shares and no
shared dispositive power.
(4) Beneficial ownership as of January 30, 1998; sole power to vote or to
direct the vote of 1,951,200 shares and no shared voting power; sole power
to dispose of or to direct the disposition of 3,324,000 shares; and no
shared dispositive power.
(5) Beneficial ownership as of February 13, 1998; shared power to vote or to
direct the vote of 3,164,000 shares and no shared voting power; shared
power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of 3,164,000 shares and no
shared dispositive power.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS
None.
44
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(a) 1. Financial Statements.
[Download Table]
PAGE
----
Independent Auditors' Report................................ F-1
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995.......................... F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1997 and
1996...................................................... F-3
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995.......................... F-4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995...... F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements........F-6 through F-28
(a) 2. Financial Statement Schedules.
[Download Table]
Schedule I -- Condensed financial information of registrant for
the years ended December 31,
1997, 1996 and 1995................................S-1 through S-3
Schedule II -- Valuation and qualifying accounts for the
years ended December 31,
1997, 1996 and 1995....................................... S-5
Other schedules of MAPCO Inc. and its subsidiaries are omitted because of
the absence of the conditions under which they are required or because the
required information is included in the Financial Statements or Notes thereto.
(a) 3. Exhibits.
[Download Table]
ITEM
----
3.(i) -- Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended and
restated effective May 14, 1987 [Exhibit 3.(i) to Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 1994*]
3.(ii) -- MAPCO Inc. By-Laws, as amended April 16, 1989 [Exhibit
3.(ii) to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1994*]
4.(a) -- Specimen of Common Stock Certificate [Exhibit 4.(a) to
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1996*]
4.(b) -- Note Agreement between Mid-America Pipeline Company and
The Prudential Insurance Company of America dated as of
April 30, 1992 [a copy of this Agreement will be
furnished to the Commission on request as provided in
sec.229.601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K]
4.(c) -- Note Agreement between Mid-America Pipeline Company and
The Prudential Insurance Company of America dated as of
May 20, 1992 [a copy of this Agreement will be furnished
to the Commission on request as provided in
sec.229.601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K]
4.(d) -- Note Agreement between Mid-America Pipeline Company and
The Prudential Insurance Company of America dated as of
July 13, 1992 [a copy of this Agreement will be furnished
to the Commission on request as provided in
sec.229.601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K]
4.(e) -- Note Agreement between Mid-America Pipeline Company and
The Prudential Insurance Company of America dated as of
July 20, 1992 [a copy of this Agreement will be furnished
to the Commission on request as provided in
sec.229.601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K]
45
[Download Table]
ITEM
----
4.(f) -- Note Agreement between Mid-America Pipeline Company and
The Prudential Insurance Company of America dated as of
November 20, 1992 [a copy of this Agreement will be
furnished to the Commission on request as provided in
sec.229.601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K]
4.(g) -- Credit Agreement dated as of March 25, 1997 among MAPCO
Inc., the Lenders party thereto, and The Chase Manhattan
Bank, as Administrative Agent. [Exhibit 4 to Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
1997.*]
4.(h) -- Rights Agreement dated as of May 29, 1996 between MAPCO
Inc. and Harris Trust Company of New York, as Rights
Agent [Exhibit 4 to Form 8-A filed June 11, 1996*]
4.(i) -- Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated November 23,
1997, between MAPCO Inc. and Harris Trust Company of New
York, as Rights Agent [Exhibit 4 to Current Report on
Form 8-K dated November 23, 1997*]
4.(j) -- Note Agreement dated as of June 16, 1989 between MAPCO
Inc. and IDS Life Insurance Company of New York, American
Enterprise Life Insurance Company, et al. [Exhibit 4.(i)
to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1994*]
4.(k) -- Note Agreement dated as of December 1, 1993 between
Seminole Pipeline Company and Principal Mutual Life
Insurance Company, et al. [a copy of this Agreement will
be furnished to the Commission on request as provided in
sec.229.601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K]
4.(l) -- Indenture dated as of March 31, 1990 between MAPCO Inc.
and Bankers Trust, Trustee [Exhibit 4.0 to Current Report
on Form 8-K dated February 19, 1991*]
4.(m) -- Senior Indenture dated as of February 25, 1997 between
MAPCO Inc. and The First National Bank of Chicago,
Trustee [Exhibit 4.5.1 to Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3
Registration Statement dated February 25, 1997*]
4.(o) -- Supplemental Indenture No. 1 dated as of March 5, 1997
between MAPCO Inc. and The First National Bank of
Chicago, as Trustee [Filed herewith]
4.(p) -- Supplemental Indenture No. 2 dated as of March 5, 1997
between MAPCO Inc. and The First National Bank of
Chicago, as Trustee [Filed herewith]
MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS AND COMPENSATORY PLANS OR ARRANGEMENTS
10.(a) -- Form of Agreement between MAPCO Inc. and Directors
relating to indemnification [Exhibit 10.(c) to Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 1992*]
10.(b) -- Form of Agreement between MAPCO Inc. and certain officers
and key employees relating to indemnification [Exhibit
10.(b) to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1994*]
10.(c) -- MAPCO Inc. 1986 Retirement Plan for Directors, as amended
and restated effective January 23, 1996 [Exhibit 10.(c)
to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1995*]
10.(d) -- Form of Amended and Restated Agreement between MAPCO Inc.
and certain officers relating to employment [Filed
herewith]
10.(e) -- Amended and Restated Agreement between MAPCO Inc. and
James E. Barnes relating to employment dated December 20,
1989, effective January 1, 1990 [Filed herewith]
10.(f) -- Amended and Restated Agreement between MAPCO Inc. and
Robert G. Sachse relating to employment dated January 1,
1993 [Filed herewith]
46
[Download Table]
ITEM
----
10.(g) -- Amended and Restated Agreement between MAPCO Inc. and
Philip W. Baxter relating to employment dated December
20, 1989, effective January 1, 1990 [Filed herewith]
10.(h) -- Form of Non-Competition Agreement Dated November 23, 1997
between MAPCO Inc. and certain officers [Filed herewith]
10.(i) -- Non-Competition Agreement Dated November 23, 1997 between
MAPCO Inc. and James E. Barnes [Filed herewith]
10.(j) -- Non-Competition Agreement Dated November 23, 1997 between
MAPCO Inc. and Robert G. Sachse [Filed herewith]
10.(k) -- Non-Competition Agreement Dated November 23, 1997 between
MAPCO Inc. and Philip W. Baxter [Filed herewith]
10.(l) -- Supplemental Retirement Agreement, as amended and
restated, as of December 12, 1991 between MAPCO Inc. and
James E. Barnes [Exhibit 10.(i) to Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1991*]
10.(m) -- MAPCO Inc. 1986 Stock Option Plan, effective January 1,
1986 [Exhibit 10.(k) to Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1992*]
10.(n) -- MAPCO Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
effective January 1, 1986 [Exhibit 10(n) to Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1993*]
10.(o) -- MAPCO Inc. 1989 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and
restated effective June 1, 1997 [Exhibit 10.(i) to
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 1997*]
10.(p) -- MAPCO Inc. 1989 Outside Director Stock Option Plan, as
amended January 23, 1996 [Exhibit 10.(k) to Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1995*]
10.(q) -- MAPCO Inc. Long-Term Investment Savings Plan, effective
January 1, 1994 [Exhibit 10(q) to Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993*]
10.(r) -- MAPCO Inc. Long-Term Investment Savings Trust, effective
January 10, 1994 [Exhibit 10(r) to Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993*]
10.(s) -- MAPCO Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan effective January
1, 1995 [Exhibit 10 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 1995*]
10.(t) -- MAPCO Inc. Outside Director Phantom Stock Plan [Exhibit
10.(q) to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1995*]
10.(u) -- MAPCO Inc. 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan effective as
of June 1, 1997 [Exhibit 10(ii) to Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1997*]
OTHER MATERIAL CONTRACTS
10.(v) -- Settlement Agreement between the state of Alaska and
MAPCO Alaska Petroleum Inc. executed on August 31, 1994
and effective August 1, 1994 [Exhibit 10 to Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
1994*]
10.(w) -- Purchase and Sale Agreement dated August 3, 1994 between
Emro Propane Company and Emro Marketing Company and MAPCO
Natural Gas Liquids Inc., MAPCO Petroleum Inc. and MAPCO
Florida Inc. [Exhibit 10 to Form 8-K filed on September
12, 1994*]
47
[Download Table]
ITEM
----
10.(x) -- Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of June 28, 1996 among
MAPCO Inc., The Beacon Group Energy Investment Fund,
L.P., MPC Partners, L.P. and Alliance Coal Corporation
[Exhibit 2 to Current Report on Form 8-K dated September
10, 1996*]
10.(y) -- Agreement and Plan of Merger among The Williams
Companies, Inc., TML Acquisition Corp. and MAPCO Inc.,
dated as of November 23, 1997, as amended January 25,
1998 [Appendix A to Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus
dated January 27, 1998]
12. -- Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
21. -- List of Subsidiaries
23. -- Independent Auditors' Consent
24. -- Power of Attorney, included as part of the signature page
of this report.
27. -- Financial Data Schedule
---------------
* Incorporated herein by reference
All other schedules and exhibits are omitted because they are not required
or are not applicable.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
The Company filed one current report on Form 8-K during the quarter ended
December 31, 1997. The current report on Form 8-K, dated November 26, 1997,
reported that the Company had entered into the Merger Agreement relating to the
Williams Merger and had amended its Rights Agreement, each as described on page
1 of this Report.
48
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, MAPCO Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
MAPCO INC.
Dated: January 27, 1998 By: /s/ JAMES E. BARNES
----------------------------------
James E. Barnes
Chairman of the Board, President
and
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
We, the undersigned officers and directors of MAPCO Inc. hereby severally
constitute James E. Barnes and Philip W. Baxter, and each of them singly, our
true and lawful attorneys with full power to them, and each of them singly, to
sign for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, any and all
amendments to this report, and generally to do all such things in our names and
behalf in our capacities as officers and directors to enable MAPCO Inc. to
comply with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and all requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying
and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said attorneys, or
either of them, to any and all amendments to this report.
[Enlarge/Download Table]
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
/s/ JAMES E. BARNES Chairman of the Board, January 27, 1998
----------------------------------------------------- President and Chief
(James E. Barnes) Executive Officer
/s/ PHILIP W. BAXTER Executive Vice President and January 27, 1998
----------------------------------------------------- Chief Financial Officer
(Philip W. Baxter)
/s/ GORDON E. SCHAECHTERLE, JR. Vice President, Controller and January 27, 1998
----------------------------------------------------- Tax Counsel (Principal
(Gordon E. Schaechterle, Jr.) Accounting Officer)
/s/ HARRY A. FISCHER, JR. Director January 27, 1998
-----------------------------------------------------
(Harry A. Fischer, Jr.)
/s/ DONALD PAUL HODEL Director January 27, 1998
-----------------------------------------------------
(Donald Paul Hodel)
/s/ MALCOLM T. HOPKINS Director January 27, 1998
-----------------------------------------------------
(Malcolm T. Hopkins)
/s/ FRANK T. MACINNIS Director January 27, 1998
-----------------------------------------------------
(Frank T. MacInnis)
/s/ FRANK A. MCPHERSON Director January 27, 1998
-----------------------------------------------------
(Frank A. McPherson)
49
[Enlarge/Download Table]
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
Director January 27, 1998
-----------------------------------------------------
(Donald L. Mellish)
/s/ ROBERT L. PARKER Director January 27, 1998
-----------------------------------------------------
(Robert L. Parker)
/s/ SAMUEL F. SEGNAR Director January 27, 1998
-----------------------------------------------------
(Samuel F. Segnar)
/s/ JOHN L. WHITMIRE Director January 27, 1998
-----------------------------------------------------
(John L. Whitmire)
50
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
MAPCO Inc., Its Directors and Stockholders:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of MAPCO
Inc. and subsidiaries, listed at Item 14(a)1 herein. Our audits also included
the financial statement schedules listed at Item 14(a)2. These financial
statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of MAPCO Inc. and subsidiaries at
December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion,
such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements, the
Company is a defendant in litigation relating to an LPG explosion in April 1992,
that occurred near an underground salt dome storage facility located near
Brenham, Texas.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective
October 1, 1997, the Company changed its method of accounting for business
process reengineering activities to conform to the consensus reached by the
Emerging Issues Task Force in Issue No. 97-13.
We have also previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards, the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 1995,
1994, and 1993, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows,
and changes in stockholders' equity for the years ended December 31, 1994 and
1993 (none of which are presented herein); and our opinion on the 1993
consolidated financial statements included an explanatory paragraph applicable
to the Company's litigation relating to retroactive increases in prices paid to
the state of Alaska under its royalty oil purchase agreements which was resolved
in 1994. In our opinion, the information set forth in the selected financial
data for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 1997, appearing
in Item 6 herein, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the
consolidated financial statements from which it has been derived.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Tulsa, Oklahoma
January 27, 1998
(March 3, 1998, as to
Notes 2 and 16)
F-1
MAPCO INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
[Enlarge/Download Table]
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
-------- -------- --------
Sales and Operating Revenues(1)............................. $3,847.5 $3,353.1 $2,856.6
Expenses:
Outside purchases and operating expenses(1)............... 3,496.1 2,965.3 2,550.1
Selling, general and administrative....................... 98.1 64.1 55.3
Depreciation and amortization............................. 86.4 79.3 76.9
Interest and debt expense................................. 51.6 56.9 58.0
Reorganization charges (Note 13).......................... -- -- 10.3
Gain on sale of net assets held for sale (Note 4)......... (66.0) (20.8) --
Other (income) expense -- net............................. (.6) (6.1) .1
-------- -------- --------
3,665.6 3,138.7 2,750.7
-------- -------- --------
Income from Continuing Operations before Provision for
Income Taxes and Minority Interest........................ 181.9 214.4 105.9
Provision for Income Taxes (Note 9)......................... 73.2 82.8 39.4
-------- -------- --------
Income from Continuing Operations before Minority
Interest.................................................. 108.7 131.6 66.5
Minority Interest in Earnings of Subsidiary................. (4.2) (1.4) (2.3)
-------- -------- --------
Income from Continuing Operations........................... 104.5 130.2 64.2
-------- -------- --------
Discontinued Operations (Note 3):
Income from discontinued operations, net of income
taxes.................................................. -- 14.5 10.5
Loss on disposal of Coal segment, net of income taxes..... (6.3) (47.2) --
-------- -------- --------
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations.................. (6.3) (32.7) 10.5
-------- -------- --------
Income Before Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting
Principle (Note 10)....................................... 98.2 97.5 74.7
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle, Net of
Income Taxes.............................................. (1.3) -- --
-------- -------- --------
Net Income.................................................. $ 96.9 $ 97.5 $ 74.7
======== ======== ========
Earnings per Common Share (Notes 1 and 10):
Income from Continuing Operations:
Basic..................................................... $ 1.91 $ 2.27 $ 1.08
======== ======== ========
Diluted................................................... $ 1.88 $ 2.26 $ 1.08
======== ======== ========
Net Income:
Basic..................................................... $ 1.77 $ 1.70 $ 1.26
======== ======== ========
Diluted................................................... $ 1.74 $ 1.69 $ 1.25
======== ======== ========
Pro Forma Amounts Assuming Retroactive Application of
Accounting Change (Note 10):
Income from Continuing Operations......................... $ 103.8 $ 129.6 $ 64.2
======== ======== ========
Net Income................................................ $ 97.5 $ 96.9 $ 74.7
======== ======== ========
---------------
(1) Includes consumer excise taxes of $157.8 million, $155.9 million and $158.1
million in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-2
MAPCO INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
ASSETS
[Download Table]
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------
1997 1996
-------- --------
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 40.8 $ 104.8
Trade receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts
(1997 -- $2.2; 1996 -- $1.7)............................ 322.6 326.0
Other receivables......................................... 64.1 46.0
Inventories (Note 6)...................................... 133.4 109.6
Prepaid expenses.......................................... 25.5 22.8
Other current assets...................................... 30.8 9.9
-------- --------
Total current assets............................... 617.2 619.1
-------- --------
Property, Plant and Equipment, at cost (Note 19)............ 2,320.7 2,154.2
Less -- accumulated depreciation and amortization........... (839.5) (797.3)
-------- --------
1,481.2 1,356.9
-------- --------
Goodwill -- Net (Note 18)................................... 140.2 109.9
Other Intangible Assets -- Net.............................. 25.2 2.2
Other Assets (Note 18)...................................... 143.9 82.6
-------- --------
309.3 194.7
-------- --------
$2,407.7 $2,170.7
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt...................... $ 39.2 $ 35.7
Accounts payable.......................................... 404.9 411.9
Accrued taxes............................................. 40.3 60.8
Accrued payroll and related expenses...................... 13.9 27.9
Other current liabilities................................. 76.5 52.3
-------- --------
Total current liabilities.......................... 574.8 588.6
-------- --------
Long-Term Debt, Excluding Current Maturities (Note 7)....... 786.2 608.4
-------- --------
Other Liabilities........................................... 55.6 67.9
-------- --------
Deferred Income Taxes (Note 9).............................. 280.4 257.1
-------- --------
Minority Interest........................................... 27.7 28.4
-------- --------
Contingencies (Note 16).....................................
-------- --------
Equity Put Options on Common Stock (Note 11)................ 12.3 16.7
-------- --------
Stockholders' Equity (Notes 11, 12 and 15):
Capital stock:
Preferred stock, without par value, 1.0 share
authorized; no shares issued
Series A junior participating preferred stock, without
par value, .2 shares authorized; no shares issued
Common stock, $1 par value, 115.0 shares authorized;
63.9 shares issued -- 1997; 63.0 shares
issued -- 1996......................................... 63.9 63.0
Capital in excess of par value............................ 126.5 96.6
Retained earnings......................................... 783.7 719.0
-------- --------
974.1 878.6
Cumulative foreign exchange translation adjustment........ (.1) --
Unamortized deferred compensation......................... (2.1) (.4)
Treasury stock, at cost, 8.4 shares -- 1997; 7.4
shares -- 1996.......................................... (253.8) (221.4)
Loan to ESOP.............................................. (47.4) (53.2)
-------- --------
670.7 603.6
-------- --------
$2,407.7 $2,170.7
======== ========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
MAPCO INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN MILLIONS)
[Enlarge/Download Table]
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------- ------- -------
Operating Activities:
Net income................................................ $ 96.9 $ 97.5 $ 74.7
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by
continuing operations:
(Income) loss from discontinued operations............. 6.3 32.7 (10.5)
Depreciation and amortization.......................... 86.4 79.3 76.9
Provision for deferred income taxes.................... 22.5 20.3 16.4
Other items not requiring (providing) cash (Note 5).... (36.5) (11.8) 16.8
Changes in operating assets and liabilities (Note 5)... (107.0) 22.9 (7.6)
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by continuing operations........ 68.6 240.9 166.7
Net cash provided by discontinued operations...... -- 21.8 63.6
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by operating activities......... 68.6 262.7 230.3
------- ------- -------
Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures and acquisitions, net of liabilities
assumed:
Continuing operations --
Capital expenditures................................. (178.4) (129.4) (200.9)
Acquisitions......................................... (59.7) (5.6) (16.5)
Discontinued operations (Note 3)....................... -- (22.1) (33.1)
Proceeds from net assets held for sale (Note 4)........... 66.0 43.0 --
Proceeds from sale of net assets of discontinued
operations (Note 3).................................... -- 236.4 --
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment...... 3.9 13.6 7.5
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates (Note 18)........ (71.4) (23.1) (1.6)
Other..................................................... -- .8 --
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities...................................... (239.6) 113.6 (244.6)
------- ------- -------
Financing Activities:
Purchases of common stock................................. (50.2) (98.3) (31.1)
Increase (decrease) in borrowings......................... 7.4 (161.3) 104.6
Dividends paid............................................ (32.9) (30.3) (29.7)
Issuances of long-term debt (Note 7)...................... 209.7 3.8 --
Payments on long-term debt................................ (30.0) (20.8) (27.3)
Other..................................................... 3.0 2.1 .5
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities...................................... 107.0 (304.8) 17.0
------- ------- -------
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents............ (64.0) 71.5 2.7
Cash and Cash Equivalents, January 1........................ 104.8 33.3 30.6
------- ------- -------
Cash and Cash Equivalents, December 31...................... $ 40.8 $ 104.8 $ 33.3
======= ======= =======
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
MAPCO INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
[Enlarge/Download Table]
COMMON STOCK CAPITAL IN
$1 PAR VALUE EXCESS OF UNAMORTIZED FOREIGN TREASURY STOCK
--------------- PAR RETAINED DEFERRED EXCHANGE ---------------- LOAN TO
SHARES AMOUNT VALUE EARNINGS COMPENSATION TRANSLATION SHARES AMOUNT ESOP
------ ------ ---------- -------- ------------ ----------- ------ ------- -------
Balance, December 31, 1994.... 62.8 $62.8 $202.8 $1,356.4 $ (.2) (32.9) $(935.6) $(63.6)
Net income.................. 74.7
Dividends declared ($0.50
per share)................ (29.7)
Purchase of common stock.... (.6) (31.1)
ESOP loan repayments........ 4.9
Issuance of common stock.... .1 .1 .1
Amortization of deferred
compensation.............. .1
Other....................... .2 .4
---- ----- ------ -------- ----- ---- ----- ------- ------
Balance, December 31, 1995.... 62.9 62.9 203.1 1,401.8 (.1) (33.5) (966.7) (58.7)
Net income.................. 97.5
Dividends declared ($0.525
per share)................ (30.1)
Two-for-one stock split
effected in the form of a
stock dividend from
treasury shares (Notes 1
and 11)................... (93.1) (750.5) 28.7 843.6
Proceeds from sale of equity
put options on common
stock (Note 11)........... .6
Equity put options on common
stock (Note 11)........... (16.7)
Purchase of common stock.... (2.6) (98.3)
ESOP loan repayments........ 5.5
Issuance of common stock.... .1 .1 2.6 (.4)
Amortization of deferred
compensation.............. .1
Other....................... .1 .3
---- ----- ------ -------- ----- ---- ----- ------- ------
Balance, December 31, 1996.... 63.0 63.0 96.6 719.0 (.4) (7.4) (221.4) (53.2)
Net income.................. 96.9
Dividends declared ($0.60
per share)................ (32.9)
Issuance of common stock.... .9 .9 18.3 (2.2)
Purchase of common stock.... (1.6) (50.2)
ESOP loan repayments........ 5.8
Business acquisitions....... .9 .6 17.8
Proceeds from sale of equity
put options on common
stock (Note 11)........... 4.9
Foreign currency
translation............... $(.1)
Tax benefit of stock-based
awards.................... 5.6
Amortization of deferred
compensation.............. .5
Other....................... .2 .7
---- ----- ------ -------- ----- ---- ----- ------- ------
Balance, December 31, 1997.... 63.9 $63.9 $126.5 $ 783.7 $(2.1) $(.1) (8.4) $(253.8) $(47.4)
==== ===== ====== ======== ===== ==== ===== ======= ======
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Consolidation -- The consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of MAPCO Inc. and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries ("MAPCO" or
the "Company"). Investments in entities in which ownership interests are 50
percent or less and the Company exercises significant influence over operating
and financial policies are accounted for using the equity method, under which
original investments are recorded at cost and adjusted by the Company's share of
earnings or losses of those entities. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated. Certain reclassifications have been made to
prior year amounts to conform to current year presentation. In addition, all
references in the consolidated financial statements to number of shares
outstanding and per share amounts of the Company's common stock have been
restated to reflect a two-for-one stock split, during 1996, effected in the form
of a stock dividend from shares held as treasury stock (see Note 11).
Estimates in the Financial Statements -- The preparation of MAPCO's
financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents -- Cash equivalents consist of short-term, highly
liquid investments which are readily convertible into cash. All investments
classified as cash equivalents have original maturities of three months or less.
Inventories -- Inventories include crude oil, refined petroleum products,
natural gas liquids ("NGLs"), appliances and retail merchandise. Inventories are
valued at the lower of cost or market. Crude oil, refined petroleum products and
retail merchandise inventories in the Petroleum Refining and Retail Petroleum
business units are determined on a last-in, first-out ("LIFO") basis. Propane,
appliances and wholesale fertilizer in the Propane Marketing business unit and
NGLs in the Natural Gas Liquids business unit are determined on an average cost
basis. Net exchange balances are classified as inventory.
Long-lived Assets -- The Company records impairment losses on long-lived
assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate that the assets
might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by
those assets are less than the carrying amounts of those assets. Long-lived
assets that are held for disposal are valued at the lower of the carrying amount
or fair value less cost to sell, except for assets that constitute a
discontinued operation. Assets of discontinued operations are valued at
estimated net realizable value. Goodwill is written down if it is probable that
estimated undiscounted cash flows generated by the related assets will be less
than the carrying amount of the related assets and goodwill.
Depreciation and Amortization -- Depreciation and amortization are computed
using the straight-line method at rates based upon estimated useful lives.
Maintenance, repairs and minor replacements are expensed. Costs of replacements
constituting improvements are capitalized. Gains or losses arising from the
ordinary sale or retirement of property, plant and equipment are generally
included in income currently. However, gains and losses from the sale or
retirement of certain assets within the NGL business unit which are depreciated
using regulatory group depreciation methods are credited or charged to
accumulated depreciation.
Excess of Purchase Price over Net Assets of Companies Acquired -- Amounts
applicable to acquisitions prior to 1971 ($4.3 million at December 31, 1997) are
not amortized. Amounts applicable to acquisitions after 1970 are amortized on a
straight-line basis over periods not exceeding forty years. MAPCO continually
evaluates the periods of amortization to determine whether subsequent events and
circumstances warrant revision of the estimated useful lives of acquired assets.
Revenue Recognition -- Revenues are recognized when earned based on
transfer of title or delivery.
F-6
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
Environmental Expenditures -- Environmental expenditures that relate to
current or future revenues are expensed or capitalized based upon the nature of
the expenditures. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations that do not contribute to current or future revenue generation
are expensed. Environmental liabilities are recorded independently of any
potential claim for recovery. Receivables are recognized in cases where
reimbursements of remediation costs are available from state funds and the
realization of those reimbursements is considered probable. Accruals related to
environmental matters are generally determined based on site-specific plans for
remediation, taking into account prior remediation experience of MAPCO and other
companies. Environmental liabilities are discounted only if the aggregate
obligation of a specific matter and the amount and timing of the related cash
payments are fixed and determinable. The effect of discounting environmental
liabilities is not material to MAPCO's financial statements. In 1997 the Company
adopted Statement of Position 96-1, "Environmental Remediation Liabilities",
which provided guidance for the recognition, measurement, display and disclosure
of environmental remediation liabilities. This statement did not have a material
impact on the Company's results of operations, liquidity or financial position.
Debt Discount and Expense -- Debt discount and expense arising from the
issuance of debt securities are capitalized and amortized using the principal
outstanding method.
Gas Balancing Arrangements -- MAPCO used the sales method of accounting for
its gas balancing arrangements. Under the sales method, MAPCO recognized
revenues on all West Panhandle gas field gas liquids sold to its customers
without regard to the under/over take position of its gas supplier. In February
1997, MAPCO sold its natural gas liquids and condensate reserves in the West
Panhandle gas field. As part of the sales agreement, MAPCO was released from its
liability for its share of prior NGL overtakes from the West Panhandle field.
Stock-Based Compensation -- Compensation expense is recorded with respect
to stock option grants and restricted stock awards to employees using the
intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion
No. 25. This method calculates compensation expense on the measurement date as
the excess of the current market price of the underlying Company stock over the
amount the employee is required to pay for the shares, if any. The expense is
recognized over the vesting period of the grant or award. The Company has
elected not to adopt the fair value method of accounting for stock-based
compensation which is encouraged, but not required, by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation." The Company has adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No.
123 in preparing its 1997 financial statement disclosures (see Note 12).
Derivative Financial Instruments -- (a) Futures, swaps and option contracts
are used to hedge against the risk of price changes of crude oil, refined
petroleum products and natural gas liquids. Contracts that are correlated to
price movements of crude oil, refined petroleum products and natural gas liquids
inventories, or to price movements of anticipated purchases and sales of such
inventories, are treated as hedges and accounted for under the deferral method,
in which gains and losses from the change in value of the contracts are deferred
and recognized in conjunction with the earnings on the hedged inventories or
anticipated transactions. Contracts which do not qualify as hedges are
classified as speculative and are marked-to-market at the end of each month.
Gains or losses on contracts which no longer qualify as hedges because the
hedged item has been sold or the anticipated transaction is no longer deemed
likely to occur are recognized in current earnings. When recognized in
accordance with the above policies, gain and losses on commodity contracts are
reported as "outside purchases and other operating expenses" in the consolidated
statements of income. (b) Interest rate swaps and interest rate locks are used
as hedges of specific debt instruments. The Company recognizes interest
differentials as adjustments to interest expense. (c) Equity put options on
common stock represent the number of options sold at their respective strike
price. Proceeds from the sale of equity put options on common stock are
accounted for as additional paid-in capital.
F-7
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
Treasury Stock -- MAPCO common stock purchased by the Company is accounted
for under the cost method whereby the entire cost of the acquired stock is
recorded as treasury stock. Gains and losses on the subsequent reissuance of
shares are credited or charged to capital in excess of par value using the
average-cost method.
Income Taxes -- Deferred income tax expense is recognized based on the net
change for the year in the deferred income tax liability, except for changes
resulting from differences between the assigned values and the tax basis of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in purchase business combinations.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on enacted tax laws and the
expected reversal of the temporary differences between the book and tax bases of
assets and liabilities.
Earnings per Share -- In the fourth quarter of 1997, the Company adopted
the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 128, "Earnings
per Share" ("SFAS No. 128"). In accordance with SFAS No. 128, the Company
computes basic earnings per common share ("Basic EPS") based on the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per
common share ("Diluted EPS") is computed based on the weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding plus the number of additional common shares that would
have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued (see
Note 10). All prior year earnings per share amounts have been restated to comply
with the provisions of SFAS No. 128.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan -- MAPCO's loan to its Employee Stock
Ownership Plan ("ESOP") is recorded as a reduction of stockholders' equity in
MAPCO's consolidated balance sheets. Compensation and interest expense are
recognized based on MAPCO's cash contributions to the ESOP.
Business Process Reengineering Costs -- The portion of those costs incurred
during a major software system implementation that are identified as business
process reengineering costs are expensed in accordance with Emerging Issues Task
Force Issue No. 97-13.
Nature of Business -- The Natural Gas Liquids business unit operations
include the transportation, processing, underground storage, trading and sales
of NGLs and the pipeline transportation of anhydrous ammonia, refined petroleum
products and crude oil. The main line of the pipeline system runs from the
Wyoming-Utah Overthrust Belt to Hobbs, New Mexico and from Hobbs through the
Midwest into Minnesota and Wisconsin. The main line also runs from Hobbs across
Texas to the Gulf Coast. Tariff charges for pipeline operations are made on
account to shippers who are engaged in energy or energy-related businesses.
The Retail Propane business unit operations include the retail and
wholesale marketing of propane and appliances. Propane and appliances are
marketed through retail plants to residential, agricultural, commercial and
industrial customers located in the upper Midwest and the Southeast regions of
the United States. Wholesale propane sales are made to dealers operating in the
same area, as well as to wholesale outlets and commercial and industrial
customers located in the Midwestern region of the United States. Wholesale
appliances are sold through a distributorship in the Midwest. Both retail and
wholesale propane sales are highly seasonal due to its primary uses for home
heating and crop drying, with sales concentrated in the fall and winter months.
Sales are generally made on account.
The Petroleum Refining business unit includes the Alaska system and the
Mid-South system. The Alaska system includes a refinery at North Pole, Alaska,
whose non-affiliated customers include wholesale, commercial, governmental and
industrial consumers. Products produced include gasoline, commercial and
military jet fuel, heating oil, diesel fuel, fuel oil, naphtha and asphalt.
Sales are generally made on account. The Mid-South system includes a refinery at
Memphis, Tennessee, whose non-affiliated customers include wholesale, industrial
and commercial consumers, jobbers, independent dealers and other
refiner/marketers primarily located in the Mid-South region of the United
States. Products produced include gasoline, low sulfur diesel fuel, commercial
and military jet fuel, K-1 kerosene, No. 6 fuel oil, propane and elemental
sulfur. Sales are generally made on account. MAPCO buys, sells and exchanges
crude oil to supply its refinery systems and
F-8
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
for general trading activity. These transactions are with companies engaged in
energy or energy-related businesses and sales are generally made on account.
The Retail Petroleum business unit includes retail convenience store
operations located in eight Southeastern states and Texas and in Fairbanks,
Anchorage and Southeastern Alaska. The retail convenience stores, primarily
under the brand name "MAPCO Express", engage in the retail marketing of
gasoline, diesel fuel, other petroleum products, convenience merchandise,
restaurants and deli fast food items. MAPCO also buys, sells and exchanges
refined petroleum products to help supply its retail convenience store
operations. These transactions are with companies engaged in energy or
energy-related businesses and sales are generally made on account.
NOTE 2. WILLIAMS MERGER
On November 24, 1997, MAPCO Inc. and The Williams Companies, Inc.
("Williams") announced that they had entered into a definitive merger agreement,
as amended as of January 25, 1998, in which MAPCO will become a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Williams in a non-taxable, stock-for-stock transaction which is
intended to be accounted for as a pooling of interests under Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 16.
The companies have agreed to exchange a fixed ratio of 1.665 of a share of
Williams common stock for each share of MAPCO common stock. That will equate to
exchanging approximately 97 million shares of Williams common stock for all of
the outstanding shares of MAPCO common stock. The transaction is valued at
approximately $3.0 billion.
The companies filed a joint preliminary proxy statement with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on December 18, 1997, and a final proxy statement on
January 27, 1998. Both the MAPCO and Williams shareholders approved the
transaction on February 26, 1998.
MAPCO recognized pre-merger expenses of $2.2 million for legal, accounting
and outside services associated with the merger. In December 1997, MAPCO paid
$14.1 million to the participants of the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.
The Company recognized $3.9 million of expense associated with this transaction.
MAPCO also paid $32.6 million for non-compete agreements, which will be
amortized over one to three years after completion of the merger. MAPCO
anticipates additional merger costs of approximately $11.0 million in 1998 for
investment banker fees. The costs associated with the non-compete agreements and
the investment banker fees are not included in the proforma information below.
The following unaudited pro forma information combines the results of operations
of Williams and MAPCO as if the merger had been consummated on January 1, 1995
(in millions except per share data):
[Enlarge/Download Table]
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
-------- -------- --------
(UNAUDITED)
Revenue............................................ $8,241.6 $6,842.9 $5,655.0
Income from Continuing Operations.................. $ 458.6 $ 492.5 $ 363.6
Basic Earnings per Common Share:
Income from Continuing Operations................ $ 1.09 $ 1.16 $ .87
Net Income....................................... $ .88 $ 1.08 $ 3.43
Diluted Earnings per Common Share:
Income from Continuing Operations................ $ 1.06 $ 1.14 $ .86
Net Income....................................... $ .86 $ 1.06 $ 3.35
Pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of results of
operations that would have occurred if the acquisition had occurred on January
1, 1995, or of future results of operations of the combined companies.
F-9
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
NOTE 3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In June 1996, the Company concluded it would sell substantially all of its
Coal business. In July 1996, the Company signed an agreement with Alliance Coal
Corporation, a corporation formed by The Beacon Group Energy Investment Fund,
L.P. ("Beacon"), to sell substantially all of the net assets of the Coal
business. The transaction was completed on September 10, 1996, with an effective
date of July 31, 1996. As a result, operations of the Coal business for the
current and prior periods have been shown as discontinued in the consolidated
statements of income. In connection with the sale, the Company made guarantees,
indemnifications and representations for certain specified matters. Management
of the Company does not expect these guarantees, indemnifications and
representations to have any material impact on results of operations, financial
position, or cash flows.
The loss on disposal of the Coal business is reported net of an income tax
benefit of $2.8 million in 1997 and $30.0 million in 1996. Income from
discontinued Coal operations includes income tax expense/(benefit) of $4.8
million and $(2.3) million for 1996 and 1995, respectively. The Coal segment's
sales and operating revenues were $276.8 million and $453.4 million for 1996 and
1995, respectively. The loss on disposal of the Coal business in 1997 includes
liabilities recognized for guarantees, indemnifications and representations made
to Beacon relative to the sale and an income tax adjustment to the 1996 loss
amount. The loss on disposal in 1996 includes a $.2 million operating loss
during the phase-out period.
NOTE 4. GAIN ON SALE OF NET ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
Effective January 1, 1997, MAPCO sold its natural gas liquids and
condensate reserves in the West Panhandle Fields of Texas to Westpan NGL
Corporation, a subsidiary of MESA Operating Company, for $66.0 million. The
Company recognized a gain of $66.0 million on the transaction as the related
reserves had no book value. As part of the sales agreement, MAPCO was released
from its liability for its share of prior NGL over-takes.
In March 1996, the Company sold its Iowa propane and liquid fertilizer
assets as well as its remaining liquid fertilizer assets in Arkansas, Illinois,
Indiana, Minnesota, Ohio and Wisconsin, to CENEX, Inc. ("CENEX"). The
transaction resulted in proceeds of $43.0 million which were used primarily for
capital expenditures, share repurchases and general corporate purposes. Sales
and operating revenues attributable to these operations were $23.9 million and
$68.8 million for 1996 and 1995, respectively. Operating profit for the same
periods was $1.8 million and $7.2 million, respectively.
F-10
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
NOTE 5. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Other items not requiring (providing) cash reported in net cash provided by
operating activities of continuing operations consist of (in millions):
[Enlarge/Download Table]
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------ ------ -----
Net periodic pension income........................... $ .4 $ (.4) $(2.5)
(Gain) loss on sales of property, plant and equipment:
Westpan gain........................................ (66.0) -- --
Cenex gain.......................................... -- (20.8) --
Other............................................... 1.8 (1.7) 1.1
Minority interest in earnings of subsidiary........... 4.2 1.4 2.3
Reorganization charges................................ -- -- 10.3
Refinery turnaround accrual........................... 4.2 4.2 5.7
Litigation and environmental accruals................. 16.4 4.6 --
Effect of change in accounting principle.............. 1.3 -- --
Other non-cash income and expense -- net.............. 1.2 .9 (.1)
------ ------ -----
$(36.5) $(11.8) $16.8
====== ====== =====
Changes in operating assets and liabilities attributable to continuing
operations consist of (in millions):
[Enlarge/Download Table]
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------- ------- ------
Decrease (increase) in:
Receivables...................................... $ .1 $(146.8) $ (9.9)
Inventories...................................... (15.8) 4.2 (17.4)
Prepaid expenses................................. 3.8 (4.0) 8.9
Other current assets............................. (19.0) 7.8 (3.1)
Other assets..................................... (19.5) 4.4 (4.4)
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable................................. (7.8) 143.2 10.9
Accrued taxes.................................... (15.9) 14.2 16.4
Accrued payroll and related expenses............. (14.0) 10.4 4.8
Other current liabilities........................ 6.6 (7.1) (17.9)
Other liabilities................................ (25.5) (3.4) 4.1
------- ------- ------
$(107.0) $ 22.9 $ (7.6)
======= ======= ======
Income taxes paid were $77.7 million, $77.3 million and $13.2 million
during 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized, was $54.3 million, $59.2 million
and $59.4 million during 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
Interest capitalized was $7.4 million, $1.3 million and $1.7 million during
1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
During 1997 the Company issued 588,037 shares of treasury stock with a fair
market value of $18.5 million in conjunction with its purchases of five retail
propane businesses.
F-11
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
NOTE 6. INVENTORIES
Inventories are recorded when purchased, produced or manufactured and are
stated at the lower of cost or market. As of December 31, 1997 and 1996,
approximately 61% and 57% of inventories, respectively, were determined by the
LIFO method. The remaining inventories were determined primarily on a weighted
average cost basis.
[Download Table]
DECEMBER 31,
----------------
1997 1996
------ ------
Raw Materials -- Crude Oil.................................. $ 30.5 $ 22.1
------ ------
Finished Products:
Refined petroleum products................................ 35.9 27.7
Fertilizer and natural gas liquids........................ 34.8 36.4
General merchandise....................................... 32.2 23.4
------ ------
102.9 87.5
------ ------
Total Inventories................................. $133.4 $109.6
====== ======
The cost to replace crude oil, refined petroleum products and retail
merchandise inventories in excess of their LIFO carrying value was approximately
$7.2 million at December 31, 1997 and $37.1 million at December 31, 1996. The
amount of income recognized in 1997 as a result of LIFO inventory liquidation
was not significant.
NOTE 7. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of (in millions):
[Download Table]
DECEMBER 31,
----------------
1997 1996
------ ------
MAPCO INC.
Commercial paper and bank money market lines................ $135.8 $128.5
8.43% ESOP Notes, payable in mortgage type principal
reductions annually through 2003.......................... 47.4 53.2
Medium Term Notes, various maturities through 2022.......... 366.7 288.8
7.70% subordinated, non-redeemable debentures, $100 million
face amount, due 2027..................................... 102.9 --
------ ------
652.8 470.5
------ ------
SUBSIDIARIES
Senior Notes:
8.51% Notes, payable in 2007.............................. 15.0 15.0
8.95% Notes, payable in 2012.............................. 35.5 35.5
8.20% Notes, payable $2.5 annually 2007 through 2012...... 15.0 15.0
8.59% Notes, payable in 2017.............................. 14.5 14.5
8.70% Notes, payable $2.0 annually 2018 through 2022...... 10.0 10.0
6.67% Notes, payable $15.0 annually 2001 through 2005..... 75.0 75.0
Other..................................................... 7.6 8.6
------ ------
172.6 173.6
------ ------
825.4 644.1
Less -- current maturities.................................. (39.2) (35.7)
------ ------
Long-term debt.............................................. $786.2 $608.4
====== ======
F-12
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
Interest rates on commercial paper and bank money market lines ranged from
5.20% to 6.60% for the year ended December 31, 1997, and from 5.18% to 6.15% for
the year ended 1996. Commercial paper and bank money market lines outstanding at
December 31, 1997 and December 31, 1996, were classified as long-term debt.
MAPCO has the ability and the intent, if necessary, under a bank credit
agreement to refinance up to $400 million of commercial paper and bank money
market lines with long-term debt having maturities in excess of one year.
The bank credit agreement for $400 million expires in March 2002, and
interest on borrowings under the bank credit agreement would be at rates
generally less than the prime interest rate. MAPCO must pay a commitment fee to
maintain the bank credit agreement. The agreement serves as a back-up for
outstanding commercial paper and for borrowings against bank money market lines.
As of December 31, 1997, no borrowings were outstanding under the bank credit
agreement.
MAPCO had $288.8 million of Medium Term Notes outstanding as of December
31, 1996. The Notes mature at various times through 2022 and bear interest at
rates ranging from 7.60% to 8.87%. In March 1997, the Company issued an
additional $103.0 million subordinated, non-redeemable Medium Term Notes with a
face amount of $100 million, bearing interest at the rate of 7.25%, and maturing
in 2009. The effective interest rate at issuance on these notes was 6.97%.
In March 1997, the Company also issued subordinated, non-redeemable
debentures with a face amount of $100 million, bearing interest at the rate of
7.70% and maturing in the year 2027. The effective interest rate at time of
issuance was 7.54%.
The Company anticipates retiring the 8.43% ESOP notes in the first quarter
of 1998, replacing them with lower interest rate notes.
MAPCO had unamortized debt issuance cost of $3.6 million as of December 31,
1997, and $1.8 million as of December 31, 1996.
The scheduled amounts to be paid on long-term debt during the next five
years are: 1998 -- $38 million, 1999 -- $32 million, 2000 -- $23 million,
2001 -- $58 million, and 2002 -- $57 million.
At December 31, 1996, the Company had entered into various interest rate
swap agreements with financial institutions which effectively changed the
Company's interest rate exposure from variable rates to fixed rates on $100
million of debt. The swap agreements' interest rates were fixed at 5.82%. The
swap agreements provided protection against actual interest rate exposure and
were not speculative in nature. The Company had minimized any risk of impact on
its financial position, liquidity or results of operations from changes in
interest rates on the $100 million of variable rate debt that was hedged through
the use of interest rate swap agreements. In 1997, the Company realized a gain
on the settlement of these swap agreements in the amount of $4.3 million. At
December 31, 1997, the Company did not have any interest rate swap agreements in
effect.
The Company had also entered into interest rate lock agreements with
financial institutions that locked underlying treasury rates at 6.12% on $200
million of public debt that the Company issued in the first quarter of 1997. The
interest rate lock agreements provided protection against interest rate exposure
on anticipated debt and were not speculative in nature. There were no interest
rate lock agreements outstanding as of December 31, 1997.
The notional amounts of interest rate swap agreements did not represent
amounts exchanged by the parties and were not a measure of the Company's
exposure to credit or market risks. The amounts exchanged were calculated on the
basis of the notional amounts and the other terms of the swap agreements.
Notional amounts were not included in the consolidated balance sheets.
F-13
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
The interest rate swap and lock agreements were subject to market risk to
the extent that market interest rates for similar instruments decreased and the
Company terminated the agreements prior to maturity.
Various loan agreements contain restrictive covenants which, among other
things, limit the payment of advances or dividends by two of Natural Gas
Liquids' subsidiaries to MAPCO. At December 31, 1997, $250 million of net assets
were restricted by such provisions, which included $60 million of restricted net
assets associated with the Discovery joint venture. At December 31, 1996, $190
million of net assets were restricted by such provisions.
NOTE 8. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the
Company using available market information and appropriate valuation
methodologies. The methods and assumptions used by the Company in estimating its
fair value disclosures for financial instruments are as follows:
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Long-term Receivables: The carrying
amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents and
long-term receivables approximate their fair value.
Interest Rate Swap and Interest Rate Lock Agreements: The fair value
of interest rate swaps and interest rate locks was determined using
available quoted market prices. There were no interest rate swaps or locks
outstanding as of December 31, 1997, and the Company had no financial basis
recorded for interest rate swaps or locks in the consolidated balance
sheets as of December 31, 1996.
Long-term Debt, Including Current Maturities: The carrying amounts of
commercial paper and other variable-rate debt instruments were
approximately 95% of their fair value as of December 31, 1997 and
approximately 97% of their fair value as of December 31, 1996. The fair
values of fixed-rate long-term debt are estimated using discounted cash
flow analyses based on the Company's incremental borrowing rates for
similar types of borrowing arrangements.
Insurance Accruals: The fair value of insurance accruals, which
represent contractual obligations to pay cash in the future, is estimated
based on a discounted cash flow analysis using the Company's incremental
borrowing rate as the discount rate.
Equity Put Options on Common Stock: Due to the market price of MAPCO's
common stock at December 31, 1997 and 1996, exceeding the strike prices of
the equity put options, the fair value of the Company's obligations under
these instruments at December 31, 1997 and 1996, is zero.
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company's financial instruments
at December 31 are as follows (in millions):
[Enlarge/Download Table]
1997 1996
------------------ ------------------
CARRYING FAIR CARRYING FAIR
AMOUNT VALUE AMOUNT VALUE
-------- ------ -------- ------
Cash and cash equivalents...................... $ 40.8 $ 40.8 $104.8 $104.8
Interest rate swaps and interest rate locks.... -- -- -- 7.3
Long-term receivables.......................... 1.0 1.0 7.0 7.0
Long-term debt, including current maturities... 825.4 868.5 644.1 666.2
Insurance accruals............................. 5.3 5.3 17.9 17.4
Equity put options on common stock............. 12.3 -- 16.7 --
The assumed incremental borrowing rates used to determine the fair value of
fixed-rate long-term debt were 6.54% to 7.03% and 6.93% to 8.15% for 1997 and
1996, respectively. The incremental borrowing rates used to determine the fair
value of insurance accruals were 6.50% for 1997 and 6.47% for 1996.
Futures, forward and option contracts are used to hedge against the risk of
price changes of crude oil, refined petroleum products, and natural gas liquids.
These contracts permit settlement by delivery of
F-14
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
commodities and therefore, are not financial instruments. Contracts that qualify
as hedges are correlated to price movements of crude oil, refined petroleum
product inventory, and natural gas liquids and any gains or losses resulting
from market changes will be substantially offset by gains or losses on the
hedged inventory. In 1997, the Company significantly increased its activities
related to the hedging of crude oil and refined petroleum product price risk.
MAPCO's crude oil, refined petroleum products, and natural gas liquids hedging
activities resulted in an unrealized loss of $4.0 million and $.3 million, on
contracts covering 27.8 million and .3 million barrels of crude oil, refined
products, and natural gas liquids, at December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
The outstanding contracts have maturity dates ranging from 1 to 24 months.
NOTE 9. INCOME TAXES
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The tax effects of
significant items comprising the Company's net deferred tax liability are as
follows (in millions):
[Download Table]
DECEMBER 31,
----------------
1996 1997
------ ------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Differences between book and tax basis of property........ $277.5 $262.5
Other..................................................... 12.8 26.4
------ ------
290.3 288.9
------ ------
Deferred tax assets:
Accrued expenses not currently deductible................. 10.3 32.7
Reserves not currently deductible......................... 7.8 4.8
Other..................................................... 3.8 4.3
------ ------
21.9 41.8
------ ------
Net deferred tax liability.................................. 268.4 247.1
Net current deferred tax asset.............................. 12.0 10.0
------ ------
Deferred income taxes....................................... $280.4 $257.1
====== ======
Income before provision for income taxes is substantially all derived from
domestic operations. Significant components of the provision for income taxes
from continuing operations are as follows (in millions):
[Enlarge/Download Table]
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------
1997 1996 1995
----- ----- -----
Current:
Federal................................................... $46.0 $57.8 $21.4
State..................................................... 4.7 4.7 1.6
----- ----- -----
50.7 62.5 23.0
----- ----- -----
Deferred:
Federal................................................... 20.0 14.6 16.6
State..................................................... 2.5 5.7 (.2)
----- ----- -----
22.5 20.3 16.4
----- ----- -----
Provision for income taxes.................................. $73.2 $82.8 $39.4
===== ===== =====
In 1997, a $2.1 million current income tax expense and a $2.8 million
deferred income tax benefit were reported with the Loss on disposal of the Coal
segment in discontinued operations. In 1996, a $14.3 million
F-15
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
current income tax expense and a $44.3 million deferred income tax benefit were
reported with the Loss on disposal of the Coal segment in discontinued
operations. Additionally, a current income tax expense of $7.0 million and a
deferred income tax benefit of $2.2 million were reported as Income from
discontinued Coal operations in 1996. In 1995, a $2.3 million income tax benefit
was reported in Income from discontinued Coal operations (see Note 3).
A reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate and MAPCO's
effective income tax rate is as follows (in percents):
[Download Table]
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------
1997 1996 1995
----- ----- -----
Statutory rate.............................................. 35.0 35.0 35.0
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
State income taxes, net of federal benefit................ 3.0 4.1 .8
Alternative minimum tax credit............................ -- (1.7) --
Other..................................................... 2.2 1.2 1.4
----- ----- -----
Effective income tax rate................................... 40.2 38.6 37.2
===== ===== =====
At December 31, 1997, MAPCO had federal income tax net operating loss
carryforwards of $1.6 million which expire as follows: $1.0 million in 1998, $.5
million in 2002 and $.1 million in 2003.
NOTE 10. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic and Diluted earnings per share are as follows:
[Download Table]
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------
1997 1996 1995
----- ----- -----
Basic Earnings per Common Share:
Income from Continuing Operations......................... $1.91 $2.27 $1.08
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations................ (.12) (.57) .18
Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle..... (.02) -- --
----- ----- -----
Net Income................................................ $1.77 $1.70 $1.26
===== ===== =====
Diluted Earnings per Common Share:
Income from Continuing Operations......................... $1.88 $2.26 $1.08
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations................ (.12) (.57) .17
Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle..... (.02) -- --
----- ----- -----
Net Income.................................................. $1.74 $1.69 $1.25
===== ===== =====
Weighted-Average Common Shares Outstanding (in millions):
Basic..................................................... 54.8 57.3 59.5
===== ===== =====
Diluted................................................... 55.6 57.6 59.7
===== ===== =====
F-16
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
A reconciliation of Basic and Diluted EPS computations are set forth as
follows (in millions except per share amounts):
[Download Table]
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------
1997 1996 1995
------ ------ -----
Income from continuing operations........................... $104.5 $130.2 $64.2
====== ====== =====
Weighted average common shares outstanding (in millions).... 54.8 57.3 59.5
------ ------ -----
Basic Earnings Per Share.................................... $ 1.91 $ 2.27 $1.08
====== ====== =====
Weighted average common shares outstanding (in millions).... 54.8 57.3 59.6
Dilutive effect of outstanding options...................... 0.8 0.3 0.1
------ ------ -----
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding.......... 55.6 57.6 59.7
------ ------ -----
Diluted Earnings Per Share.................................. $ 1.88 $ 2.26 $1.08
====== ====== =====
Equity put options (see Note 11) were outstanding at December 31, 1997 and
1996, but were not included in the computation of Diluted EPS because the
respective year-end market prices of common shares exceeded the exercise prices
of the put options.
In November 1997, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on
Issue No. 97-13 that third party costs typically associated with business
process reengineering activities should be expensed as incurred and that, if
costs were previously capitalized for such activities, any remaining unamortized
costs are required to be written off. In accordance with this consensus, in the
fourth quarter of 1997 the Company recognized a charge of $2 million, $1.3
million or approximately $0.02 per share on an after-tax basis, to write-off
previously capitalized costs associated with business reengineering activities
purchased from external sources. Pro forma amounts assuming the accounting
change had been applied retroactively are as follows (in millions except per
share amounts):
[Download Table]
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------ ------ ------
Income from Continuing Operations:....................... $103.8 $129.6 $ 64.2
====== ====== ======
Basic Earnings per Common Share........................ $ 1.89 $ 2.26 $ 1.08
====== ====== ======
Diluted Earnings per Common Share...................... $ 1.87 $ 2.25 $ 1.08
====== ====== ======
Net Income:.............................................. $ 97.5 $ 96.9 $ 74.7
====== ====== ======
Basic Earnings per Common Share........................ $ 1.78 $ 1.69 $ 1.26
====== ====== ======
Diluted Earnings per Common Share...................... $ 1.75 $ 1.68 $ 1.25
====== ====== ======
NOTE 11. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Stock Split -- On September 10, 1996, the Board of Directors authorized a
two-for-one stock split effected in the form of a stock dividend from shares
held as treasury stock, which was distributed on September 30, 1996, to
shareholders of record on September 16, 1996. In accounting for the stock split,
MAPCO recorded a reduction in treasury stock of $843.6 million, with a
corresponding reduction in retained earnings of $750.5 million and a reduction
in capital in excess of par value of $93.1 million.
Equity Put Options -- As part of its share repurchase program, the Company
began selling equity put options in the fourth quarter of 1996. The put options
entitled the holder, at the expiration date, to sell shares of common stock to
the Company at a specified price. Premiums received on options sold were used to
reduce the average price of shares repurchased in 1997 from $31.57 to $31.34 per
share in 1997 and from $29.82 to
F-17
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
$29.64 per share in 1996. As of December 31, 1997, put options with an aggregate
exercise price of $12.3 million on 400,000 shares were outstanding at strike
prices ranging from $30.00 to $31.00 per share with expiration dates ranging
from January 9, 1998, to February 18, 1998. No additional equity put options
will be sold as MAPCO suspended its share repurchase program in November 1997,
in conjunction with the proposed Williams Merger.
Rights Agreement -- Under a Rights Agreement dated May 29, 1996, MAPCO has
a one-half Right outstanding for each outstanding share of MAPCO common stock.
Under certain limited conditions as defined in the Rights Agreement, each Right
entitles the registered holder to purchase from MAPCO a unit, which consists of
one two-hundredth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock,
without par value ("Participating Preferred Stock"), at $200 subject to
adjustment. At December 31, 1996, there were 27.8 million Rights outstanding,
that if exercised, would result in the issuance of 138,887 shares of
Participating Preferred Stock.
The Rights are not exercisable until the Distribution Date (as defined in
the Rights Agreement) which will occur upon the earlier of (i) ten business days
following a public announcement that an Acquiring Person (as defined in the
Rights Agreement) has acquired, or obtained the right to acquire, beneficial
ownership of 15% or more of MAPCO's outstanding common stock or (ii) ten
business days (or, if determined by the Company's Board of Directors, a
specified or unspecified later date) following the commencement of a tender
offer or exchange offer that would result in a person or group owning 15% or
more of MAPCO's outstanding common stock.
The Rights have certain anti-takeover effects. The Rights will cause
substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire MAPCO without
conditioning the offer on the Rights being redeemed. Upon exercise and the
occurrence of certain events as defined in the Rights Agreement, each holder of
a Right, except the Acquiring Person (as defined in the Rights Agreement), will
have the right to receive MAPCO common stock or common stock of the acquiring
company having a value equal to two times the purchase price of the Right.
The Rights should not interfere with any merger or other business
combination approved by MAPCO since the Board of Directors may, at its option,
at any time prior to the earlier of the Stock Acquisition Date (as defined in
the Rights Agreement) or Final Expiration Date, July 7, 2006, redeem the Rights
in whole, but not in part, at $.01 per Right. Until a Right is exercised, the
holder thereof, as such, will have no rights as a stockholder of the Company,
including the right to vote or to receive dividends.
In November 1997, in connection with the Williams Merger, the Company
amended its Rights Agreement. This amendment will effectively prevent the Rights
from becoming exercisable as a result of the Williams Merger and the
consummation of the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. The
amendment provides that all outstanding Rights will expire immediately prior to
the effective time of the Williams Merger.
NOTE 12. STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS
At December 31, 1997, the Company had two stock-based compensation plans
and an employee stock purchase plan. Under the MAPCO Inc. 1989 Stock Incentive
Plan (the "Plan"), stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock,
phantom stock and stock purchase rights may be issued to key employees. At
December 31, 1997, only stock options and restricted stock had been awarded
under the Plan. Each stock option entitles the holder to purchase from MAPCO one
share of common stock at the option price, which is determined by the closing
sales price of MAPCO common stock on the grant date. Options expire ten years
from the grant date. The options granted in 1997 will vest in one-third
increments in 1999, 2000 and 2001.
Options granted under the Plan contain a Replacement Option feature. The
Replacement Option feature is triggered when an optionee uses stock, rather than
cash, to exercise an option. Upon exercise by an exchange
F-18
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
of stock, Replacement Options are granted equal to the number of shares tendered
for the exercise of the options plus the number of shares of stock withheld for
income tax purposes. The exercise price per share for any Replacement Option is
equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date the
Replacement Option is granted. A Replacement Option is not exercisable for at
least six months from the grant date for those granted prior to January 22,
1992, and twelve months for those granted after January 22, 1992.
In May 1992, MAPCO stockholders approved an amendment to the Plan which
increased the number of gross shares (i.e. the number of options issuable,
including shares forfeited for tax withholding and shares surrendered to
exercise an option) which may be issued under the Plan to 14 million; however,
the maximum number of actual net shares which may be issued under the Plan
remained at 4 million (plus a small number of shares from prior plans). The
number of gross shares available for future grants under the Plan at December
31, 1997, was 1,945,697. The cumulative number of actual net shares issued under
the Plan was 1,399,073 at December 31, 1997.
In March 1997, the Board of Directors, through its Compensation Committee,
approved a broad based stock option program through which stock options were
granted to most full-time employees. As a result, the number of options granted
under the Plan in 1997 was significantly greater than in prior years. A summary
of the status of the Plan as of December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, and changes
during the years ending on those dates is presented below:
[Enlarge/Download Table]
1997 1996 1995
------------------------------ ----------------------------- -----------------------------
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE WEIGHTED-AVERAGE WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
SHARES EXERCISE PRICE SHARES EXERCISE PRICE SHARES EXERCISE PRICE
----------- ---------------- ---------- ---------------- ---------- ----------------
Outstanding at beginning
of year................ 5,712,890 $28.19 5,175,552 $27.95 4,088,182 $27.54
Granted.................. 3,699,702 $33.47 1,381,207 $28.27 1,344,148 $26.54
Exercised................ (1,416,387) $28.64 (385,875) $31.05 (91,938) $27.46
Forfeited................ (260,985) $28.71 (457,994) $28.11 (164,840) $29.10
----------- ---------- ----------
Outstanding at end of
year................... 7,735,220 $30.61 5,712,890 $28.19 5,175,552 $27.95
=========== ========== ==========
Options exercisable at
year-end............... 1,881,249 2,683,707 2,915,024
Weighted-average fair
value of options
granted during the
year................... $15.22 $10.99 $10.81
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions used for grants in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively: dividend yield
of .60 for 1997, 1.0 for 1996 and 1.0 for 1995; expected volatility of 30
percent, 17 percent and 14 percent; risk free interest rates of 6.1, 5.9 and 7.6
percent; and expected lives of 6 years for 1997 and 1995 and 7 years for 1996.
F-19
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding
under the Plan at December 31, 1997:
[Enlarge/Download Table]
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
NUMBER WEIGHTED-AVERAGE NUMBER
RANGE OF OUTSTANDING REMAINING WEIGHTED-AVERAGE EXERCISABLE WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
EXERCISE PRICES AT 12/31/97 CONTRACTUAL LIFE EXERCISE PRICE AT 12/31/97 EXERCISE PRICE
--------------- ----------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------- ----------------
$13.84 - $21.94 84,890 2.0 years $19.45 84,884 $19.45
$21.95 - $30.04 2,948,252 5.8 years $27.10 1,144,781 $27.07
$30.05 - $38.14 4,256,248 8.0 years $31.95 651,584 $31.28
$38.15 - $46.25 445,830 3.1 years $43.18 0 --
--------- ---------
$13.84 - $46.25 7,735,220 6.8 years $30.61 1,881,249 $28.19
========= =========
In 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively, the Company granted approximately
75,000, 23,000 and 1,400 shares of restricted stock with a weighted-average fair
value of $32, $27 and $24 per share. Restricted stock is valued on the issuance
date and amortized over vesting periods varying from three to five years.
Unamortized deferred compensation is reported as a reduction of stockholders'
equity. The Company recognized compensation expense of approximately $0.4
million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million for restricted stock in 1997, 1996 and
1995, respectively.
After approval by shareholders at the May 1997 annual shareholders meeting,
the Company adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "ESPP") in which nearly
all full-time employees are eligible to participate. Under the ESPP, at the
beginning of each offering period eligible employees may elect to purchase the
Company's common stock at 85% of the lower of its beginning-of-period or
end-of-period market price. On December 31, 1997, the exercise date of the first
offering period, employees purchased approximately 150,000 shares of common
stock from the Company at $25.50 per share. Based on the December 31, 1997,
closing stock price of $46.25, the fair value of the employees' purchase rights
was $20.75 per share.
MAPCO has a Director Stock Option Plan (the "Directors' Plan") which
provides for the grant of stock options to MAPCO's non-employee Directors. Under
the Directors' Plan, stock options are granted at the closing price of MAPCO's
common stock on the date of the grant. The number of options granted, which is
fixed by the plan, become fully exercisable on the date of the grant. The
maximum number of shares which may be issued under the Directors' Plan is
400,000 shares. Options were granted to purchase 18,000 shares in both 1997 and
1996 and 36,000 shares in 1995, with a weighted-average exercise price of
$31.75, $28.94 and $29.44 per share, and a weighted-average year-end fair value,
determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, of $16.57, $6.80 and
$6.77 per share, respectively. Options outstanding and exercisable at December
31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, were 243,854, 227,854 and 239,854, with a
weighted-average exercise price of $27.41, $27.08 and $26.91 per share,
respectively. The weighted-average remaining contractual life of options
outstanding at December 31, 1997, was 5.1 years, and the range of exercise
prices was from $9.25 to $31.75 per share. Also, in 1997 the Company issued to
its Directors approximately 4,000 shares of phantom stock valued at $0.1
million.
The Company applies APB Opinion 25 and related Interpretations in
accounting for its plans. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized
for its stock option and stock purchase plans. Had compensation cost for the
Company's stock-based compensation plans been determined based on the fair value
at the grant dates for awards under those plans consistent with the method of
SFAS No. 123, the
F-20
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
Company's net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro
forma amounts indicated below (in millions except per share amounts):
[Enlarge/Download Table]
1997 1996 1995
-------------------- -------------------- --------------------
AS AS AS
REPORTED PRO FORMA REPORTED PRO FORMA REPORTED PRO FORMA
-------- --------- -------- --------- -------- ---------
Net income.................. $96.9 $78.2 $97.5 $93.0 $74.7 $72.8
Basic earnings per share.... $1.77 $1.43 $1.70 $1.62 $1.26 $1.05
Diluted earnings per
share..................... $1.74 $1.41 $1.69 $1.61 $1.25 $1.22
The above pro forma disclosures are not likely to be representative of the
effects on reported net income and earnings per share for future years because,
pursuant to the Merger Agreement entered into with Williams (see Note 2), stock
options outstanding under MAPCO's stock incentive plans will be deemed
exercisable and converted into a right to receive shares of Williams stock at
the time of merger. The number of shares to be received will be determined based
on the fair value per share over the per share exercise price of each option. At
the same time, all shares of restricted stock will become fully vested. The
merger agreement prohibits MAPCO from granting any further stock-based awards
after November 24, 1997, except for options granted through the replacement
option feature, and from selling stock to employees under the ESPP, except for
sales to employees who elected prior to September 1, 1997 to participate in the
ESPP offering period ended December 31, 1997.
NOTE 13. REORGANIZATION CHARGES
During 1995, the Company recorded $10.3 million of charges associated with
reorganizations in the Natural Gas Liquids and Propane Marketing business units
and in Corporate. The primary employee groups affected were field service
personnel in the Natural Gas Liquids and Propane Marketing business units. The
charges were primarily related to an early retirement program which resulted in
the reduction of 111 employees. Principal items included in the charge were
enhanced pension benefits, postretirement benefits, severance pay and other
related benefits.
F-21
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
NOTE 14. BUSINESS UNIT INFORMATION
In 1996, MAPCO reorganized its business segments into four business units:
Natural Gas Liquids, Propane Marketing, Petroleum Refining and Retail Petroleum.
Also in 1996, the Coal segment was sold (see Note 3) and as a result, the net
assets, results of operations and cash flows of the Coal segment have been shown
as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements. The Natural
Gas Liquids business unit operations include the transportation, processing,
underground storage, sales and trading of NGLs, and the pipeline transportation
of anhydrous ammonia, refined products and crude oil. The Propane Marketing
business unit operations include the retail and wholesale marketing of propane
and appliances. The Petroleum Refining business unit operations include the
refining, wholesale marketing and trading of crude oil and refined petroleum
products. The Retail Petroleum business unit operations include the retail
marketing of gasoline, diesel fuel, other petroleum products, convenience
merchandise, restaurants and deli fast food items. Business unit information,
restated to reflect the above changes, is as follows (in millions):
[Enlarge/Download Table]
SALES AND OPERATING REVENUES
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONS
TO
PROPERTY, DEPRECIATION
UNAFFILIATED OPERATING IDENTIFIABLE PLANT AND &
CUSTOMERS INTERSEGMENT TOTAL PROFIT ASSETS EQUIPMENT AMORTIZATION
------------ ------------ -------- --------- ------------ ------------ ------------
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
Natural Gas Liquids............. $ 656.4 $ 94.2 $ 750.6 $183.6(1) $ 967.3 $ 29.8 $29.2
Propane Marketing............... 412.7 .7 413.4 (6.2) 422.0 56.5 20.1
Petroleum Refining.............. 2,023.6 284.8 2,308.4 96.8 620.7 42.2 19.0
Retail Petroleum................ 730.2 3.0 733.2 11.8 236.8 57.1 13.1
Other........................... 24.6 24.6 (8.9) 24.2 4.6 .7
Eliminations.................... (382.7) (382.7)
-------- ------- -------- ------ -------- ------ -----
Total business units.......... 3,847.5 3,847.5 277.1(1) 2,271.0 190.2 82.1
General corporate............... (44.2) 136.7 15.4 4.3
Interest and debt expense....... (51.6)
Other income (expense) -- net... .6
-------- ------- -------- ------ -------- ------ -----
$3,847.5 $ $3,847.5 $181.9 $2,407.7 $205.6 $86.4
======== ======= ======== ====== ======== ====== =====
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
Natural Gas Liquids............. $ 682.9 $ 33.5 $ 716.4 $137.1 $ 921.5 $ 38.4 $29.6
Propane Marketing............... 426.2 3.3 429.5 65.0(2) 379.0 20.2 16.3
Petroleum Refining.............. 1,529.1 284.3 1,813.4 63.9 527.5 36.2 18.0
Retail Petroleum................ 714.9 714.9 30.3 190.2 19.0 12.0
Eliminations.................... (321.1) (321.1)
-------- ------- -------- ------ -------- ------ -----
Total business units.......... 3,353.1 3,353.1 296.3(2) 2,018.2 113.8 75.9
General corporate expense....... (31.1) 152.5 15.6 3.4
Interest and debt expense....... (56.9)
Other income (expense) -- net... 6.1
-------- ------- -------- ------ -------- ------ -----
$3,353.1 $ $3,353.1 $214.4 $2,170.7 $129.4 $79.3
======== ======= ======== ====== ======== ====== =====
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
Natural Gas Liquids............. $ 529.2 $ 20.7 $ 549.9 $104.2 $ 905.5 $121.6 $26.5
Propane Marketing............... 338.0 .3 338.3 35.2 352.9 17.8 17.1
Petroleum Refining.............. 1,358.1 215.9 1,574.0 35.7 452.1 46.7 21.2
Retail Petroleum................ 631.3 631.3 12.5 168.8 19.8 10.0
Eliminations.................... (236.9) (236.9) (.8)
-------- ------- -------- ------ -------- ------ -----
Total business units.......... 2,856.6 2,856.6 187.6 1,878.5 205.9 74.8
General corporate expense....... (23.6) 45.4 3.9 2.1
Interest and debt expense....... (58.0)
Other income (expense) -- net... (.1)
-------- ------- -------- ------ -------- ------ -----
$2,856.6 $ $2,856.6 $105.9 $1,923.9 $209.8 $76.9
======== ======= ======== ====== ======== ====== =====
---------------
(1) Includes a gain of $66.0 million on the sale of MAPCO's interest in the West
Panhandle field (Note 4).
(2) Includes a gain of $20.8 million on the sale of certain propane and liquid
fertilizer assets to CENEX (Note 4).
F-22
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
NOTE 15. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
MAPCO has two defined benefit plans covering substantially all employees,
plus certain employees of the Coal business sold in 1996 (see Note 3). One of
these plans is the MAPCO Inc. and Subsidiaries Pension Plan which has two
separate benefit structures. The benefit formula for the MAPCO Inc. and
subsidiaries (except Coal) structure is a step-rate-plan formula based on final
average pay and years of service, while the benefit formula for the Coal
structure is a flat dollar unit formula based on years of service. The employees
of the Coal business became fully vested at the time of the sale. The second
plan, which is significantly smaller and covers employees of South Atlantic Coal
Company, has a career average pay formula based on years of service. MAPCO's
funding policy for both of these plans is to make the minimum annual
contributions required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. No
contributions were required for 1997 and 1996 due to the over-funded status of
these plans. The assets in these plans are primarily comprised of equity
securities, but also include fixed income securities, guaranteed investment
contracts and equity real estate investments.
Net periodic pension income (expense) from MAPCO's defined benefit pension
plans includes the following components (in millions):
[Download Table]
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------ ------ ------
Service cost........................................... $ (4.0) $ (6.3) $ (4.6)
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation.......... (13.8) (12.6) (11.2)
Actual return on plan assets........................... 39.9 28.8 39.0
Net amortization and deferral.......................... (22.2) (9.5) (20.7)
------ ------ ------
Net periodic pension income (expense).................. $ (.1) $ .4 $ 2.5
====== ====== ======
The funded status of MAPCO's defined benefit pension plans and the amounts
recognized in MAPCO's consolidated balance sheets are as follows (in millions):
[Download Table]
DECEMBER 31,
------------------
1997 1996
------- -------
Vested benefit obligation................................... $(185.2) $(157.7)
======= =======
Accumulated benefit obligation.............................. $(190.6) $(164.5)
======= =======
Projected benefit obligation................................ $(212.4) $(182.7)
Plan assets at fair value................................... 239.4 207.6
------- -------
Plan assets in excess of projected benefit obligation....... 27.0 24.9
Unrecognized net actuarial gain............................. (5.0) (3.2)
Unrecognized prior service cost............................. 1.1 1.4
------- -------
Prepaid pension cost........................................ $ 23.1 $ 23.1
======= =======
The rates used in determining the funded status and pension income of the
two pension plans at December 31, 1997 are as follows:
[Download Table]
SOUTH ATLANTIC
MAPCO INC. AND COAL
SUBSIDIARIES COMPANY
-------------- --------------
Discount rate........................................ 7.0% 7.0%
Rate of increase in compensation..................... 5.0% --
Long-term rate of return on plan assets.............. 10.0% 10.0%
F-23
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
Because the South Atlantic Coal plan was frozen in September, 1996, the
rate of increase in compensation is not applicable to that plan's funded status
or pension income as determined at December 31, 1997.
The rates used in determining the funded status of the two pension plans at
December 31, 1996 and 1995, and pension income for 1996, are as follows:
[Download Table]
SOUTH ATLANTIC
MAPCO INC. AND COAL
SUBSIDIARIES COMPANY
-------------- --------------
Discount rate........................................ 7.5% 7.5%
Rate of increase in compensation..................... 5.0% 4.0%
Long-term rate of return on plan assets.............. 10.0% 10.0%
The rates used in determining pension income for the two pension plans for
1995 are as follows:
[Download Table]
SOUTH ATLANTIC
MAPCO INC. AND COAL
SUBSIDIARIES COMPANY
-------------- --------------
Discount rate........................................ 9.0% 9.0%
Rate of increase in compensation..................... 5.0% 4.0%
Long-term rate of return on plan assets.............. 10.0% 10.0%
The Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act of 1992 ("Coal Act") imposed
obligations for certain retiree medical costs on MAPCO. The undiscounted
liability at December 31, 1997, relative to MAPCO's obligations under the Coal
Act, which were retained after the sale of the Coal segment, was $17.1 million.
The expected payments under the Coal Act are $.4 million in the years 1998
through 2000, $.5 million in the years 2001 and 2002, and $14.9 million
thereafter. MAPCO's recorded liability relative to the Coal Act at December 31,
1997, was $6.9 million. The difference between the expected aggregate
undiscounted liability of $17.1 million and the liability reflected in the
financial statements is the result of discounting the expected payments which
span more than 30 years.
MAPCO has an ESOP that includes substantially all employees through
voluntary participation. Allocation of the MAPCO common stock held by the ESOP
to individual employees is based on the employee's eligible contribution to the
ESOP and the number of shares of common stock available for allocation. The
common stock available for allocation will be released in quarterly installments
over the remaining life of the ESOP's loan from MAPCO.
MAPCO's cash contributions to the ESOP will equal the ESOP's principal and
interest payments on its loan from MAPCO reduced by the dividends the ESOP
receives on the MAPCO common stock held by the ESOP. Dividends of $2.0 million,
$2.1 million and $2.3 million in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively, on the MAPCO
common stock owned by the ESOP were used for debt service. MAPCO made cash
contributions to the ESOP of $8.3 million in 1997, $8.2 million in 1996 and $8.1
million in 1995. MAPCO recognized compensation expense in connection with the
ESOP of $3.8 million, $3.3 million and $2.7 million and interest expense of $4.5
million, $4.9 million and $5.4 million in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. At
December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively, the ESOP held 1.3 and 1.1 million
allocated shares, 1.7 and 2.0 million unallocated shares and .3 million and .3
million shares pending to be allocated. The fair market value of unallocated
shares held by the ESOP at December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively, was $78.8
million and $69.5 million.
F-24
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
NOTE 16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Leases
MAPCO leases land, buildings and equipment under lease agreements which
provide for the payment of minimum rentals. The annual rental expense under
operating leases was $11.1 million, $19 million and $20 million in 1997, 1996
and 1995, respectively.
Future minimum payments under operating leases are $68.0 million in total
and during the next five years are: 1998 -- $12.6 million, 1999 -- $11.4
million, 2000 -- $10.2 million, 2001 -- $7.8 million and 2002 -- $5.1 million.
On December 11, 1996, the Company entered into a seven-year operating lease
arrangement to accommodate the acquisition and construction of certain assets.
Payments under the lease are based on the amounts spent for acquisition or
construction of assets and the applicable interest rate. After the lease term,
the arrangement may be extended by agreement of the parties, or the Company may
purchase or arrange for the sale of the assets. As of December 31, 1997, all of
the $100 million commitment remained available under the lease.
Texas Explosion Litigation
On April 7, 1992, a liquefied petroleum gas explosion occurred near an
underground salt dome storage facility located near Brenham, Texas and owned by
an affiliate of the Company, Seminole Pipeline Company ("Seminole"). The
Company, as well as Seminole, Mid-America Pipeline Company, MAPCO Natural Gas
Liquids Inc., and other non-MAPCO entities were named as defendants in civil
action lawsuits filed in state district courts located in four Texas counties.
Seminole and the related MAPCO entities have settled in excess of 1,600 claims
in these lawsuits. The only lawsuit remaining is the Dallmeyer case which was
tried before a jury in Harris County. In Dallmeyer, the judgment rendered in
March 1996 against defendants Seminole and MAPCO-related entities totaled
approximately $72 million which included nearly $65 million of punitive damages
awarded to the 21 plaintiffs.
Both plaintiffs and defendants have appealed the Dallmeyer judgment to the
Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth District of Texas in Harris County. The
defendants seek to have the judgment modified in many respects, including the
elimination of punitive damages as well as a portion of the actual damages
awarded. If the defendants prevail on appeal, it will result in an award
significantly less than the judgment, or alternatively, a retrial of the case.
The plaintiffs have cross appealed and seek to modify the judgment to increase
the total award plus interest to exceed $155 million. In February and March
1998, the Company entered into settlement agreements involving 12 of the 21
plaintiffs to finally resolve their claims against all defendants for an
aggregate payment of $8 million. These settlements have satisfied and reduced
the judgment on appeal by approximately $33 million.
Management believes that it has defenses of considerable merit and will
vigorously litigate the Dallmeyer appeal or seek a satisfactory settlement to
the Company, but is not able to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter at
this time. The Company has accrued a liability representing an estimate of
amounts it may incur to finally resolve all litigation and has also recorded a
receivable which corresponds to the remainder of its insurance coverage to be
reimbursed by its insurance carrier. Management is unable to estimate a range of
loss beyond the amount accrued. Resolutions unfavorable to the Company could
result in liabilities and charges materially in excess of the amount accrued.
General Litigation
The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various other lawsuits,
claims and regulatory proceedings incidental to their businesses. In the opinion
of management, the outcome of such matters will not
F-25
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, consolidated results
of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
NOTE 17. ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
Environmental remediation liabilities relate primarily to costs associated
with soil and groundwater remediation obligations of the Company's Retail
Petroleum, Marketing and Refining, and Propane Marketing Business Units. The
Company has accrued its best estimate for its environmental remediation
liabilities, which totaled $23.9 million and $27.7 million at December 31, 1997
and 1996, respectively. Receivables of $13.1 million and $14.7 million at
December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively, have been recognized as recoverable
from state funds in connection with laws permitting reimbursement by the states
of certain expenses associated with underground storage tank problems and
repairs. The Company discounts certain components of its accrued environmental
remediation liability and receivable estimates. At December 31, 1997 and 1996,
respectively, the undiscounted estimated environmental remediation liabilities
totaled $25.6 million and $29.3 million, and the undiscounted estimated
receivables totaled $14.7 million and $15.4 million.
NOTE 18. GOODWILL AND OTHER ASSETS
Net goodwill was $140.2 million and $109.9 million at December 31, 1997 and
1996, respectively. The increase in goodwill primarily reflects the ACS Data,
EZ-Serve, Gas Supply and various propane company acquisitions completed during
1997.
Other assets included investments in unconsolidated affiliates of $94.4
million and $23.7 million at December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively. The
increase in the investment in unconsolidated affiliates primarily reflects
MAPCO's investment in the Discovery project during 1997.
NOTE 19. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment at year-end consisted of the following (in
millions):
[Download Table]
1997 1996
-------- --------
Cost:
Natural Gas Liquids....................................... $1,189.5 $1,186.5
Propane Marketing......................................... 302.2 250.6
Petroleum Refining........................................ 534.2 492.4
Retail Petroleum.......................................... 231.2 179.2
New Ventures.............................................. 6.1 --
Corporate................................................. 57.5 45.5
-------- --------
2,320.7 2,154.2
Accumulated Depreciation.................................... (839.5) (797.3)
-------- --------
Net Property, Plant and Equipment........................... $1,481.2 $1,356.9
======== ========
F-26
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
NOTE 20. SUPPLEMENTAL QUARTERLY INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
[Enlarge/Download Table]
QUARTER
------------------------------------------
1 2 3 4
------- ------- ------- ---------
(IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
1997
Sales and operating revenues.......................... $931.2 $854.3 $982.1 $1,079.9
Operating profit...................................... $138.2 $ 41.1 $ 57.6 $ 40.2
Income from continuing operations..................... $ 72.7 $ 10.7 $ 22.1 $ (1.0)
Income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle................................ $ 72.7 $ 10.7 $ 22.1 $ (7.3)
Net income (loss)..................................... $ 72.7 $ 10.7 $ 22.1 $ (8.6)
Basic earnings per common share:
Income from continuing operations................... $ 1.32 $ .20 $ .41 $ (.02)
Income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle............................. $ 1.32 $ .20 $ .41 $ (.13)
Net income.......................................... $ 1.32 $ .20 $ .41 $ (.16)
Diluted earnings per common share:
Income from continuing operations................... $ 1.30 $ .20 $ .40 $ (.02)
Income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle............................. $ 1.30 $ .20 $ .40 $ (.13)
Net income.......................................... $ 1.30 $ .20 $ .40 $ (.16)
1996
Sales and operating revenues.......................... $741.5 $782.7 $797.5 $1,031.4
Operating profit...................................... $ 98.0 $ 48.8 $ 59.2 $ 90.3
Income from continuing operations..................... $ 47.4 $ 17.8 $ 22.7 $ 42.3
Net income (loss)..................................... $ 55.2 $(21.0) $ 21.0 $ 42.3
Basic earnings per common share:
Income from continuing operations................... $ .82 $ .31 $ .40 $ .75
Net income.......................................... $ .95 $ (.36) $ .37 $ .75
Diluted earnings per common share:
Income from continuing operations................... $ .81 $ .31 $ .39 $ .75
Net income.......................................... $ .95 $ (.36) $ .36 $ .75
Operating profit and income from continuing operations in the 1997 fourth
quarter included charges of $15.2 million and $10.8 million, respectively, for
certain asset write offs, additional contingency, legal and other accrual
adjustments. In addition, income from continuing operations in the 1997 fourth
quarter included charges of $3.6 million for accounting and legal expenses
associated with the Williams merger and an additional accrual associated with
MAPCO's Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.
Operating profit and income from continuing operations in the 1997 first
quarter included a gain of $66.0 million and $39.5 million, respectively, on the
sale of MAPCO's interest in the natural gas liquids and condensate in the West
Panhandle field.
Operating profit and income from continuing operations in the 1996 first
quarter increased $20.8 million and $12.8 million, respectively, from a gain on
sale of assets to CENEX. Net income in the 1996 second quarter was reduced by
$45.5 million from the loss on disposal of the Coal business.
F-27
MAPCO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
Net income in the first quarter of 1996 included $7.8 million of income
from the discontinued Coal operations. The net loss in the second quarter
included $6.7 million of income from the discontinued Coal operations and a
$45.5 million loss on the disposal of the Coal segment. Net income in the third
quarter of 1996 included a $1.7 million loss on the disposal of the Coal
segment. The net loss in the fourth quarter of 1997 included a $6.3 million loss
on disposal of the Coal segment.
F-28
MAPCO INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE I -- CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(IN MILLIONS)
[Enlarge/Download Table]
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------ ------ ------
Expenses:
Selling, general and administrative....................... $ 39.9 $ 26.0 $ 21.4
Depreciation.............................................. 4.3 3.1 2.1
Interest and debt expense................................. 45.1 44.3 46.0
Other expense (income) -- net............................. (2.6) (9.0) (3.4)
------ ------ ------
Loss before Income Tax Benefit.............................. (86.7) (64.4) (66.1)
Income Tax Benefit.......................................... 14.7 19.3 22.1
Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Taxes.... -- 14.5 10.5
Loss on Disposal of Coal Segment, Net of Income Taxes....... (6.3) (47.2) --
Equity in Net Income of Subsidiaries........................ 175.2 175.3 108.2
------ ------ ------
Net Income.................................................. $ 96.9 $ 97.5 $ 74.7
====== ====== ======
See notes to condensed financial statements.
S-1
MAPCO INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE I -- CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
BALANCE SHEETS
(IN MILLIONS)
ASSETS
[Download Table]
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------
1997 1996
-------- --------
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 5.0 $ 72.6
Receivables............................................... 8.9 11.7
Prepaid expenses and other current assets................. 22.7 11.7
-------- --------
Total current assets.............................. 36.6 96.0
-------- --------
Property, Plant and Equipment, at cost...................... 32.3 22.0
-------- --------
Other Assets:
Receivables from investments in subsidiaries.............. 1,265.8 1,066.7
Other assets.............................................. 62.4 4.0
-------- --------
1,328.2 1,070.7
-------- --------
$1,397.1 $1,188.7
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt...................... $ 36.4 $ 30.9
Accounts payable.......................................... 24.5 25.5
Accrued taxes............................................. 0.2 11.5
Other current liabilities................................. 20.8 22.5
-------- --------
Total current liabilities......................... 81.9 90.4
-------- --------
Long-term Debt, excluding current maturities................ 616.4 439.6
-------- --------
Other Liabilities........................................... 3.1 34.4
-------- --------
Deferred Income Taxes....................................... 12.7 4.0
-------- --------
Equity Put Options on Common Stock.......................... 12.3 16.7
-------- --------
Stockholders' Equity:
Common stock.............................................. 63.9 63.0
Capital in excess of par value............................ 126.5 96.6
Retained earnings......................................... 783.7 719.0
-------- --------
974.1 878.6
Cumulative foreign exchange translation adjustment........ (0.1) --
Unamortized deferred compensation......................... (2.1) (0.4)
Treasury stock, at cost................................... (253.8) (221.4)
Loan to ESOP.............................................. (47.4) (53.2)
-------- --------
670.7 603.6
-------- --------
$1,397.1 $1,188.7
======== ========
See notes to condensed financial statements.
S-2
MAPCO INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE I -- CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN MILLIONS)
[Enlarge/Download Table]
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------- ------- -------
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income................................................ $ 96.9 $ 97.5 $ 74.7
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization.......................... 4.3 3.4 2.1
Provision for deferred income taxes.................... 9.1 5.3 1.5
Equity in net income of subsidiaries................... (175.2) (222.5) (108.2)
Equity in net income of discontinued subsidiary........ 6.3 32.7 (10.5)
Other items not requiring (providing) cash............. 7.7 (.4) 2.0
Changes in operating assets and liabilities............ (110.4) (15.5) 37.5
------- ------- -------
Net cash used in operating activities............. (161.3) (99.5) (.9)
------- ------- -------
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures...................................... (14.3) (15.6) (3.9)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment...... -- 6.4 --
Proceeds from sale of discontinued subsidiary............. -- 236.4 --
Accounts with subsidiaries................................ (5.4) 242.9 (11.1)
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities...................................... (19.7) 470.1 (15.0)
------- ------- -------
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Purchase of common stock.................................. (50.2) (98.3) (31.1)
Increase (decrease) in borrowings......................... 7.4 (161.3) 104.6
Dividends................................................. (32.9) (30.3) (29.7)
Issuance of long-term debt................................ 206.0 -- --
Payments on long-term debt................................ (25.0) (20.0) (26.0)
Exercise of stock options................................. 9.6 1.8 .1
Other..................................................... (1.5) .3 .5
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities...................................... 113.4 (307.8) 18.4
------- ------- -------
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents............ (67.6) 62.8 2.5
Cash and Cash Equivalents, January 1........................ 72.6 9.8 7.3
------- ------- -------
Cash and Cash Equivalents, December 31...................... $ 5.0 $ 72.6 $ 9.8
======= ======= =======
See notes to condensed financial statements.
S-3
MAPCO INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE I -- CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Consolidation -- The financial statements of MAPCO Inc. reflect the
investment in subsidiaries using the equity method.
Statements of Cash Flow -- MAPCO Inc. made cash payments for interest of
$40.4 million, $45.5 million and $45.8 million in 1997, 1996 and 1995,
respectively.
Income Taxes -- MAPCO Inc. files a consolidated Federal income tax return
with its subsidiaries. Members of the consolidated group are allocated income
tax expense or benefit based upon their results as reflected in the consolidated
Federal income tax return.
NOTE 2. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Reference is made to the Consolidated Financial Statements and related
notes of MAPCO Inc. and subsidiaries for additional information.
NOTE 3. DEBT AND GUARANTEES
Information on the long-term debt of MAPCO Inc. is disclosed in Note 7 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements. MAPCO Inc. has guaranteed certain trade
payable obligations and performance guarantees arising in the ordinary course of
business. The scheduled amounts to be paid on long-term debt during the next
five years are: 1998 -- $36 million, 1999 -- $32 million, 2000 -- $23 million,
2001 -- $42 million and 2002 -- $42 million.
NOTE 4. DIVIDENDS RECEIVED
Subsidiaries of MAPCO Inc. do not make formal cash dividend declarations
and distributions to the parent. MAPCO Inc. receives and disburses cash on
behalf of its subsidiaries. Any restrictions in debt agreements on the transfer
of cash to MAPCO Inc. by its subsidiaries did not have any impact during 1997,
1996 or 1995.
S-4
MAPCO INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II -- VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(IN MILLIONS)
[Enlarge/Download Table]
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E
-------- ---------- ----------------------- ------------- ----------
ADDITIONS
-----------------------
BALANCE AT CHARGED TO CHARGED TO BALANCE AT
BEGINNING COSTS AND OTHER END OF
DESCRIPTION OF PERIOD EXPENSES ACCOUNTS DEDUCTIONS(1) PERIOD
----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ----------
Year Ended December 31, 1997
Allowance for doubtful accounts --
Receivables...................... $1.7 $4.5 $(.8) $3.2 $2.2
==== ==== ==== ==== ====
Allowance for doubtful accounts --
Other assets..................... $4.6 $ $ $ $4.6
==== ==== ==== ==== ====
Year Ended December 31, 1996
Allowance for doubtful accounts --
Receivables...................... $1.5 $1.2 $ .1 $1.1 $1.7
==== ==== ==== ==== ====
Allowance for doubtful accounts --
Other assets..................... $1.6 $3.0 $ $ $4.6
==== ==== ==== ==== ====
Year Ended December 31, 1995
Allowance for doubtful accounts --
Receivables...................... $2.3 $ .5 $ $1.3 $1.5
==== ==== ==== ==== ====
Allowance for doubtful accounts --
Other assets..................... $ $1.6 $ $ $1.6
==== ==== ==== ==== ====
---------------
(1) Bad debts written off, less recoveries (net).
S-5
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
[Download Table]
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
4.(o) -- Supplemental Indenture No. 1 dated as of March 5, 1997
between MAPCO Inc. and The First National Bank of
Chicago, as Trustee
4.(p) -- Supplemental Indenture No. 2 dated as of March 5, 1997
between MAPCO Inc. and The First National Bank of
Chicago, as Trustee
10.(d) -- Form of Amended and Restated Agreement between MAPCO Inc.
and certain officers relating to employment
10.(e) -- Amended and Restated Agreement between MAPCO Inc. and
James E. Barnes relating to employment dated December 20,
1989, effective January 1, 1990
10.(f) -- Amended and Restated Agreement between MAPCO Inc. and
Robert G. Sachse relating to employment dated January 1,
1993
10.(g) -- Amended and Restated Agreement between MAPCO Inc. and
Philip W. Baxter relating to employment dated December
20, 1989, effective January 1, 1990
10.(h) -- Form of Non-Competition Agreement Dated November 23, 1997
between MAPCO Inc. and certain officers
10.(i) -- Non-Competition Agreement Dated November 23, 1997 between
MAPCO Inc. and James E. Barnes
10.(j) -- Non-Competition Agreement Dated November 23, 1997 between
MAPCO Inc. and Robert G. Sachse
10.(k) -- Non-Competition Agreement Dated November 23, 1997 between
MAPCO Inc. and Philip W. Baxter
12. -- Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
21. -- List of Subsidiaries
23. -- Independent Auditors' Consent
24. -- Power of Attorney, included as part of the signature page
of this report
27. -- Financial Data Schedule
Dates Referenced Herein and Documents Incorporated by Reference
4 Subsequent Filings that Reference this Filing
↑Top
Filing Submission 0000950134-98-001719 – Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)
Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
About — Privacy — Redactions — Help —
Wed., May 8, 7:45:53.2pm ET 
