Document/ExhibitDescriptionPagesSize 1: 10-K Annual Report HTML 1.70M
4: EX-10.15 Material Contract HTML 100K
2: EX-10.4C Material Contract HTML 62K
3: EX-10.4F Material Contract HTML 55K
5: EX-21 Subsidiaries List HTML 51K
6: EX-23 Consent of Experts or Counsel HTML 45K
7: EX-31.1 Certification -- §302 - SOA'02 HTML 49K
8: EX-31.2 Certification -- §302 - SOA'02 HTML 49K
9: EX-32.1 Certification -- §906 - SOA'02 HTML 43K
16: R1 Document and Entity Information HTML 67K
17: R2 Consolidated Balance Sheets HTML 144K
18: R3 Consolidated Balance Sheets Consolidated Balance HTML 61K
Sheet (Parenthetical)
19: R4 Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss) HTML 88K
20: R5 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income HTML 75K
21: R6 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows HTML 152K
22: R7 Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity HTML 108K
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity
23: R8 Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity HTML 48K
(Parenthetical)
24: R9 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 146K
25: R10 Acquisitions HTML 124K
26: R11 Revenues HTML 147K
27: R12 Earnings (Loss) Per Share HTML 83K
28: R13 Restructuring and Other Initiatives, Net HTML 62K
29: R14 Retirement and Other Benefit Plans HTML 396K
30: R15 Income Taxes HTML 171K
31: R16 Business Segment Information HTML 157K
32: R17 Inventories HTML 50K
33: R18 Property and Equipment HTML 67K
34: R19 Goodwill and Intangible Assets HTML 108K
35: R20 Long-Term and Short-Term Financing Arrangements HTML 64K
36: R21 Leases HTML 69K
37: R22 Risk Management and Derivatives HTML 96K
38: R23 Fair Value Measurements HTML 154K
39: R24 Shareholders' Equity HTML 119K
40: R25 Share-Based Compensation HTML 212K
41: R26 Commitments and Contingencies HTML 52K
42: R27 Financial Information for the Company and its HTML 797K
Subsidiaries
43: R28 Quarterly Financial Data HTML 118K
44: R29 Valuation and Qualifying Accounts HTML 123K
45: R30 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 220K
(Policies)
46: R31 Acqusitions (Tables) HTML 94K
47: R32 Revenues (Tables) HTML 136K
48: R33 Earnings (Loss) Per Share (Tables) HTML 78K
49: R34 Retirement and Other Benefit Plans (Tables) HTML 378K
50: R35 Income Taxes (Tables) HTML 158K
51: R36 Business Segment Information (Tables) HTML 156K
52: R37 Inventories (Tables) HTML 50K
53: R38 Property and Equipment (Tables) HTML 64K
54: R39 Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Tables) HTML 141K
55: R40 Long-Term and Short-Term Financing Arrangements HTML 45K
(Tables)
56: R41 Leases (Tables) HTML 68K
57: R42 Risk Management and Derivatives (Tables) HTML 92K
58: R43 Fair Value Measurements (Tables) HTML 137K
59: R44 Shareholders' Equity (Tables) HTML 113K
60: R45 Share-Based Compensation (Tables) HTML 199K
61: R46 Financial Information for the Company and its HTML 799K
Subsidiaries (Tables)
62: R47 Quarterly Financial Data (Tables) HTML 118K
63: R48 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 195K
(Narrative) (Details)
64: R49 Acquisitons (Narrative) (Details) HTML 212K
65: R50 Acqusition (Schedule of Allocation of Purchase HTML 90K
Price) (Details)
66: R51 Acquisitions Acquisitions (Schedule of Pro Forma HTML 49K
Information) (Details)
67: R52 Revenues (Narrative) (Details) HTML 57K
68: R53 Revenues (Schedule of Impact of the Adoption of HTML 102K
Topic 606) (Details)
69: R54 Revenues (Schedule of Disagreggation of Revenue) HTML 87K
(Details)
70: R55 Revenues (Schedule of Contract Balances) (Details) HTML 49K
71: R56 Earnings (Loss) Per Share (Narrative) (Details) HTML 56K
72: R57 Earnings (Loss) Per Share Earnings (Loss) Per HTML 89K
Share (Schedule of Earnings Per Share, Basic and
Diluted) (Details)
73: R58 Restructuring and Other Initiatives, Net HTML 160K
(Narrative) (Details)
74: R59 Retirement and Other Benefit Plans Retirement and HTML 146K
Other Benefit Plans (Narrative) (Details)
75: R60 Retirement and Other Benefit Plans Retirement and HTML 73K
Other Benefit Plans (Schedule of Changes in
Benefit Obligations) (Details)
76: R61 Retirement and Other Benefit Plans Retirement and HTML 49K
Other Benefit Plans (Schedule of Assumptions Used
to Determine Benefit Obligation) (Details)
77: R62 Retirement and Other Benefit Plans Retirement and HTML 94K
Other Benefit Plans (Schedule of Fair Value
Allocation of Plan Assets) (Details)
78: R63 Retirement and Other Benefit Plans Retirement and HTML 66K
Other Benefit Plans (Schedule of Changes in Fair
Value of Plan Assets) (Details)
79: R64 Retirement and Other Benefit Plans Retirement and HTML 56K
Other Benefit Plans (Schedule of Amounts
Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheet)
(Details)
80: R65 Retirement and Other Benefit Plans Retirement and HTML 56K
Other Benefit Plans (Schedule of Projected and
Accumulated Benefit Obligation in Excess of Fair
Value) (Details)
81: R66 Retirement and Other Benefit Plans Retirement and HTML 53K
Other Benefit Plans (Schedule of Components of
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, Net of
Tax) (Details)
82: R67 Retirement and Other Benefit Plans Retirement and HTML 51K
Other Benefit Plans (Schedule of Expected
Amortization of Components of AOCI) (Details)
83: R68 Retirement and Other Benefit Plans Retirement and HTML 67K
Other Benefit Plans (Schedule of Net Periodic
Benefit Income) (Details)
84: R69 Retirement and Other Benefit Plans Retirement and HTML 52K
Other Benefit Plans (Schedule of Assumptions to
Determine Net Periodic Benefit Income) (Details)
85: R70 Retirement and Other Benefit Plans Retirement and HTML 72K
Other Benefit Plans (Schdeule of Information on
Expected Cash Flows) (Details)
86: R71 Income Taxes (Narrative) (Details) HTML 114K
87: R72 Income Taxes (Schedule of the Components of Income HTML 63K
Tax Provision (Benefit)) (Details)
88: R73 Income Taxes (Schedule of the Differences Between HTML 84K
the Tax Provision Reflected in the Consolidated
Financial Statements and the Amounts Calculated at
the Federal Statutory Income Tax Rate) (Details)
89: R74 Income Taxes (Schedule of Significant Components HTML 98K
of Deferred Income Tax Assets and Liabilities)
(Details)
90: R75 Business Segment Information Business Segment HTML 50K
Information (Narrative) (Details)
91: R76 Business Segment Information (Schedule of Business HTML 84K
Segment Information) (Details)
92: R77 Business Segment Information (Schedule of HTML 52K
Reconciliation of Operating Earnings Before Income
Taxes) (Details)
93: R78 Business Segment Information (Schedule of Net HTML 65K
Sales and Long-Lived Assets by Geographic Area)
(Details)
94: R79 Inventories (Narrative) (Details) HTML 42K
95: R80 Inventories (Schedule of Inventories) (Details) HTML 51K
96: R81 Property and Equipment (Narrative) (Details) HTML 47K
97: R82 Property and Equipment (Schedule of Property and HTML 62K
Equipment) (Details)
98: R83 Property and Equipment (Schedule of Useful Lives HTML 58K
of Property and Equipment) (Details)
99: R84 Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Narrative) HTML 100K
(Details)
100: R85 Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Schedule of HTML 58K
Goodwill and Intangible Assets) (Details)
101: R86 Goodwill and Intangible Assets Goodwill and HTML 75K
Intangible Assets (Schedule of Finite and
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets) (Details)
102: R87 Long-Term and Short-Term Financing Arrangements HTML 88K
(Narrative) (Details)
103: R88 Long-Term and Short-Term Financing Arrangements HTML 49K
(Schedule of Redemption Price Percentages)
(Details)
104: R89 Leases (Narrative) (Details) HTML 56K
105: R90 Leases (Schedule of Summary of Rent Expense for HTML 52K
Operating Leases) (Details)
106: R91 Leases (Schedule of Future Minimum Payments under HTML 62K
Noncancelable Operating Leases with an Initial
Term of One Year or More) (Details)
107: R92 Risk Management and Derivatives (Narrative) HTML 45K
(Details)
108: R93 Risk Management and Derivatives Risk Management HTML 53K
and Derivatives (Schedule of all Purchase and Sale
Contracts of a Foreign Currency) (Details)
109: R94 Risk Management and Derivatives (Schedule of Fair HTML 51K
Values of Derivative Instruments Designated as
Hedging Instruments Included within the
Consolidated Balance Sheet) (Details)
110: R95 Risk Management and Derivatives (Schedule of HTML 55K
Effect of Derivative Instruments in Cash Flow
Hedging Relationships on the Consolidated
Statements of Earnings) (Details)
111: R96 Fair Value Measurements (Narrative) (Details) HTML 89K
112: R97 Fair Value Measurements (Schedule of Assets and HTML 94K
Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on Recurring
Basis) (Details)
113: R98 Fair Value Measurements Fair Value Measurements HTML 51K
(Schedule of Impairment Charges by Segment)
(Details)
114: R99 Fair Value Measurements (Schedule of Fair Value of HTML 54K
Financial Instruments) (Details)
115: R100 Shareholders' Equity (Narrative) (Details) HTML 59K
116: R101 Shareholders' Equity (Schedule of Accumulated HTML 78K
Other Comprehensive Loss) (Details)
117: R102 Share-Based Compensation (Narrative) (Details) HTML 123K
118: R103 Share-Based Compensation (Schedule of Share-based HTML 55K
Compensation by Plan) (Details)
119: R104 Share-Based Compensation (Schedule of Restricted HTML 63K
Stock Activity) (Details)
120: R105 Share-Based Compensation (Schedule of Performance HTML 67K
Share Activity) (Details)
121: R106 Share-Based Compensation (Schedule of Stock Option HTML 66K
Activity) (Details)
122: R107 Share-Based Compensation (Schedule of Restricted HTML 93K
Stock Unit Activity) (Details)
123: R108 Share-Based Compensation (Schedule of Information HTML 50K
about Restricted Stock Units Granted, Vested and
Settled) (Details)
124: R109 Share-Based Compensation (Schedule of Restricted HTML 49K
Stock Units Compensation Expense) (Details)
125: R110 Commitments and Contingencies (Narrative) HTML 73K
(Details)
126: R111 Financial Information for the Company and its HTML 41K
Subsidiaries (Narrative) (Details)
127: R112 Financial Information for the Company and its HTML 156K
Subsidiaries (Schedule of Condensed Consolidating
Balance Sheets) (Details)
128: R113 Financial Information for the Company and its HTML 159K
Subsidiaries (Schedule of Condensed Consolidating
Statements of Earnings) (Details)
129: R114 Financial Information for the Company and its HTML 106K
Subsidiaries (Schedule of Condensed Consolidating
Statements of Comprehensive Income) (Details)
130: R115 Financial Information for the Company and its HTML 118K
Subsidiaries (Schedule of Condensed Consolidating
Statements of Cash Flows) (Details)
131: R116 Quarterly Financial Data (Schedule of Quarterly HTML 106K
Financial Data) (Details)
132: R117 Valuation of Qualifying Accounts (Schedule of HTML 75K
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts) (Details)
134: XML IDEA XML File -- Filing Summary XML 265K
133: EXCEL IDEA Workbook of Financial Reports XLSX 202K
10: EX-101.INS XBRL Instance -- cal-20190202 XML 8.18M
12: EX-101.CAL XBRL Calculations -- cal-20190202_cal XML 348K
13: EX-101.DEF XBRL Definitions -- cal-20190202_def XML 1.80M
14: EX-101.LAB XBRL Labels -- cal-20190202_lab XML 3.08M
15: EX-101.PRE XBRL Presentations -- cal-20190202_pre XML 2.22M
11: EX-101.SCH XBRL Schema -- cal-20190202 XSD 315K
135: ZIP XBRL Zipped Folder -- 0000014707-19-000020-xbrl Zip 587K
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Name
of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock — par value $0.01 per share
New York Stock Exchange
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form
10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”“accelerated filer,”“smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large
accelerated filer þ
Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨
Smaller reporting company ¨
Emerging growth company ¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No þ
The aggregate market value of the stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of August 3, 2018, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $1,409.0 million.
As
of March 1, 2019, 41,877,368 common shares were outstanding.
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III.
1
INTRODUCTION
This Annual Report on Form 10-K is a document that U.S. public companies file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission ("SEC") on an annual basis. Part II of the Form 10-K contains the business information and financial statements that many companies include in the financial sections of their annual reports. The other sections of this Form 10-K include further information about our business that we believe will be of interest to investors. We hope investors will find it useful to have all of this information in a single document.
The SEC allows us to report information in the Form 10-K by “incorporating by reference” from another part of the Form 10-K or from the proxy statement. You will see that information is “incorporated by reference” in various parts of our Form 10-K. The proxy statement will be available on our website
after it is filed with the SEC in April 2019.
Unless the context otherwise requires, “we,”“us,”“our,”“the Company” or “Caleres” refers to Caleres, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Information in this Form 10-K is current as of April 2, 2019, unless otherwise specified.
CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
In
this report, and from time to time throughout the year, we share our expectations for the Company’s future performance. These forward-looking statements include statements about our business plans; the potential development, regulatory approval and public acceptance of our products; our expected financial performance, including sales performance and the anticipated effect of our strategic actions; the anticipated benefits of acquisitions; the outcome of contingencies, such as litigation; domestic or international economic, political and market conditions; and other factors that could affect our future results of operations or financial position, including, without limitation, statements under the captions “Business,”“Legal Proceedings” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Any statements we make that are not
matters of current disclosures or historical fact should be considered forward-looking. Such statements often include words such as “believe,”“expect,”“anticipate,”“intend,”“plan,”“estimate,”“will” and similar expressions. By their nature, these types of statements are uncertain and are not guarantees of our future performance.
Our forward-looking statements represent our estimates and expectations at the time that we make them. However, circumstances change constantly, often unpredictably, and investors should not place undue reliance on these statements. Many events beyond our control will determine whether our expectations will be realized. We disclaim any current intention or obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, or the factors that may affect their realization, whether in light of new information,
future events or otherwise, and investors should not rely on us to do so. In the interests of our investors, and in accordance with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors explains some of the important reasons that actual results may be materially different from those that we anticipate.
Caleres, Inc. (the "Company"), originally founded as Brown Shoe Company in 1878 and incorporated in 1913, is a global footwear company with annual net sales of $2.8 billion. Current activities include the operation of retail shoe stores and e-commerce websites
as well as the design, development, sourcing, manufacturing and marketing of footwear for women, men and children. Our business is seasonal in nature due to consumer spending patterns, with higher back-to-school and holiday season sales. Traditionally, the third fiscal quarter accounts for a substantial portion of our earnings for the year.
Our net sales are comprised of four major categories: women's footwear, men's footwear, children's footwear and clothing and accessories. The percentage of net sales attributable to each category is as follows:
2018
2017
2016
Women's
footwear
61
%
59
%
63
%
Men's footwear
24
%
25
%
22
%
Children's
footwear
8
%
9
%
9
%
Clothing and accessories
7
%
7
%
6
%
Employees
We
had approximately 11,500 full-time and part-time employees as of February 2, 2019. In the United States, there are no employees subject to union contracts. In Canada, we employ approximately 25 warehouse employees under a union contract, which expires in October 2019.
Competition
With many companies operating retail shoe stores and shoe departments, we compete in a highly fragmented market. In addition, the continuing consumer shift to online and mobile shopping has increased
price competition and requires retailers to lower shipping costs, improve shipping speeds and optimize mobile platforms. Our competitors include local, regional and national shoe store chains, department stores, discount stores, mass merchandisers, numerous independent retail operators of various sizes and e-commerce businesses. Quality of products and services, store location, trend-right merchandise selection and availability of brands, pricing, advertising and consumer service are all factors that impact retail competition.
In addition, our wholesale customers sell shoes purchased from competing footwear suppliers. Those competing footwear suppliers own and license brands, many of which are well-known and marketed aggressively. Many retailers, who are our wholesale customers, source directly from factories or through agents. The wholesale footwear business has low barriers
to entry, which further intensifies competition.
FAMOUS FOOTWEAR
Our Famous Footwear segment includes our Famous Footwear stores, Famous.com and FamousFootwear.ca. Famous Footwear is one of America’s leading family-branded footwear retailers with 992 stores at the end of 2018 and net sales of $1.6 billion in 2018. Our core consumers are
women who seek leading national brands of athletic, casual and fashionable footwear at a value for themselves and their families.
Famous Footwear stores feature a wide selection of brand name athletic, casual and dress shoes for the entire family. Brands carried include, among others, Nike, Skechers, adidas, Vans, Converse, Under Armour, New Balance, Sperry, Asics, Bearpaw, Sof Sole and Puma, as well as company-owned and licensed brands including, among others, Dr. Scholl's Shoes, LifeStride, Naturalizer, Fergie Footwear, Blowfish Malibu, Carlos by Carlos Santana, Circus by Sam Edelman and Vionic. Our company-owned and licensed products are sold to our Famous Footwear segment by our Brand Portfolio segment at a profit and represent approximately 7% of the Famous Footwear segment's net sales. We
work closely with our vendors to provide our consumers with fresh product and, in some cases, product exclusively designed for and available only in our stores. Famous Footwear’s retail price points typically range from $20 for shoes up to $230 for boots.
4
Famous Footwear stores are located in strip shopping centers as well as outlet and regional malls in all 50 states, Canada and Guam. The breakdown by venue at the end of each of the last three fiscal years is as follows:
2018
2017
2016
Strip
centers
653
677
699
Outlet malls
183
189
190
Regional
malls
156
160
166
Total
992
1,026
1,055
We
expect to open approximately 15 new stores and close approximately 45 stores in 2019, as we continue to align our real estate and e-commerce strategies. New stores typically experience an initial start-up period characterized by lower sales and operating earnings than what is generally achieved by more mature stores. While the duration of this start-up period may vary by type of store, economic environment and geographic location, new stores typically reach a normal level of profitability within approximately four years.
Famous Footwear relies on merchandise allocation systems and processes that use allocation criteria, consumer segmentation and inventory data in an effort to ensure stores are adequately stocked with product and to differentiate
the needs of each store based on location, consumer segmentation and other factors. Famous Footwear’s distribution systems allow for merchandise to be delivered to each store weekly, or on a more frequent basis, as needed. Famous Footwear also uses regional third-party pooled distribution sites across the country.
Famous Footwear’s marketing programs include digital marketing and social media, e-commerce advertising, direct mail, local and national television, in-store advertisements and radio, all of which are designed to further develop and reinforce the Famous Footwear concept and strengthen our connection with consumers. We believe the success of our campaigns is attributable to highlighting key categories and tailoring the timing of such messaging to adapt to seasonal shopping patterns. In 2018, we spent approximately $50.1
million to advertise and market Famous Footwear to our target consumers, a portion of which was recovered from suppliers. Famous Footwear has an extensive loyalty program (“Rewards”), which informs and rewards frequent consumers with product previews, earned incentives based upon purchase continuity and other periodic promotional offers. In 2018, approximately 76% of our Famous Footwear net sales were generated by our Rewards members. In early 2019, we will be introducing a new Rewards program, "Famously You Rewards", that we believe will increase membership, improve the frequency of store and online visits and allow the consumer to move more seamlessly between the store and online shopping experience.
As
part of our omni-channel approach to reach consumers, we also operate Famous.com and FamousFootwear.ca, which offer an expanded product assortment beyond what is sold in Famous Footwear stores. Accessible via desktop, tablet and mobile devices, Famous.com helps consumers explore product assortments, including items available in local stores, and make purchases. Famous.com also allows Rewards members to view their points status and purchase history, manage profile settings and engage further with the brand. Famous Footwear’s mobile app further serves as a hub for Rewards members to shop, find local stores, redeem Rewards certificates and learn about the newest products, latest trends and hottest deals. In 2017, we invested in a new content management system to evolve our personalization capabilities on Famous.com, and evolved our fulfillment logic to drive more efficient shipping with multiple pair purchases. In 2018, we launched FamousFootwear.ca, our e-commerce
site in Canada, where we implemented the same omni-channel capabilities for the Canadian consumer that had been utilized in the United States, such as home delivery and buy online, pick up in store.
The expansion and modernization projects at our distribution centers in Lebanon, Tennessee and Lebec, California, which were completed in the second half of 2016, are providing additional shipping flexibility, operational efficiencies and an expansion of our logistics infrastructure capacity. We continue to meet the omni-channel demands of today with minor operational changes, including faster order processing and delivery to our consumers.
5
BRAND
PORTFOLIO
Our Brand Portfolio segment offers retailers and consumers a portfolio of leading brands by designing, developing, sourcing, manufacturing and marketing branded footwear for women and men at a variety of price points. Certain of our branded footwear products are sold under brand names that are owned by the Company and others are developed pursuant to licensing agreements. Our Brand Portfolio segment sells footwear on a wholesale basis to retailers. The segment also sells footwear on a direct-to-consumer basis through our branded retail stores and e-commerce businesses. We expanded our men's business in 2016 with our acquisition of Allen Edmonds and in 2018, we gained additional access to the casual footwear market with our acquisition of Blowfish Malibu and the contemporary comfort market with our acquisition
of Vionic. See further discussion related to these acquisitions in the Portfolio of Brands section below and Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
Portfolio of Brands
The following is a listing of our principal brands and licensed products:
Naturalizer: Naturalizer was born in 1927 when we realized women deserved a shoe with a beautiful fit. Our Naturalizer brand is sold primarily at Naturalizer retail stores, national chains, online retailers, department stores and independent retailers. Naturalizer footwear is also distributed through approximately 52 retail and wholesale partners in 47 countries around the world. Suggested retail price points range from $69 for shoes to $220
for boots.
Sam Edelman: Designer Sam Edelman’s lifestyle brand is inspired by timeless American elegance that bridges the gap between aspiration and attainability to define modern luxury. Sam Edelman footwear is sold primarily through online retailers, national chains, department stores, Sam Edelman retail stores, catalogs and independent retailers at suggested retail price points from $45 for shoes to $240 for boots.
Vionic: In October 2018, we acquired Vionic to expand our access to the growing contemporary comfort footwear category. Vionic, which was founded in 1979, brings together style and science, combining innovative biomechanics with the most coveted trends. The brand is sold online, through independent retailers, television, department stores, national chains, specialty
retailers and our Famous Footwear stores for suggested retail price points from $40 for shoes to $250 for boots.
Allen Edmonds: In December 2016, we acquired Allen Edmonds to increase our exposure in men’s footwear. Allen Edmonds, founded in 1922, is a U.S.-based direct-to-consumer and wholesaler of premium men’s footwear, apparel, leather goods and accessories with a strong manufacturing heritage. Allen Edmonds products are available at premier stores worldwide and select retailers, including our 76 stores in the United States and Italy, and online at AllenEdmonds.com at suggested retail price points from $295 to $495 for shoes and boots.
Dr. Scholl’s Shoes: Inspired by its founder Dr. William Scholl, Dr. Scholl’s Shoes remains forever
passionate about creating iconic, effortless footwear for a healthy life. This footwear reaches consumers at a wide range of distribution channels including national chains, mass merchandisers, online, our Famous Footwear retail stores and independent retailers. Suggested price points range from $50 for shoes to $190 for boots. We have a long-term license agreement with Bayer HealthCare, LLC to sell Dr. Scholl’s Shoes, which is renewable through December 2026 for sales in the United States and Canada.
LifeStride: For more than 70 years, LifeStride has created quality footwear for women who value both style and all-day comfort. The brand is sold in national chains, our Famous Footwear retail stores, online and department stores at suggested retail price points ranging from $40 for shoes to $100 for boots.
Franco
Sarto: The Franco Sarto brand embodies timeless, wearable style inspired by the craft and design of Italian footwear. The brand is sold in major national chains, online, department stores, specialty retailers, our Famous Footwear stores, catalogs and independent retailers at suggested retail price points from $89 for shoes to $300 for boots.
Vince: The Vince women's shoe collection launched in 2012 and was expanded in 2014 to include the Vince men's footwear collection. The brand is primarily sold in premier department stores, online, national chains and specialty retailers at suggested price points from $195 for shoes to $595 for boots. We have a license agreement with Vince, LLC to sell Vince footwear through December 2021.
Rykä: For over 25 years, Rykä has been innovating athletic
footwear exclusively for women. The brand is distributed through national chains, online retailers, independent retailers, department stores, specialty retailers and our Famous Footwear retail stores at suggested retail price points from $50 to $90.
6
Bzees: Bzees is the brand of women’s sporty footwear that energizes the mind and body from the feet up. The brand is distributed through national chains, department stores, online retailers, independent retailers, specialty retailers and our retail stores at suggested retail price points from $59 for shoes to $179 for boots.
Fergie Footwear by Fergie: We have created a namesake footwear
line in collaboration with Grammy Award-winning artist Fergie (Fergie Duhamel, formerly Stacy Ferguson). Fergie Footwear is currently being sold at national chains, our Famous Footwear retail stores, online and at department stores at suggested retail price points from $59 for shoes to $179 for boots. We have a license agreement with Krystal Ball Productions, Inc. to sell Fergie/Fergalicious footwear that expires in December 2020, with extension options through December 2026.
Carlos by Carlos Santana: The Carlos by Carlos Santana collection of women’s footwear is sold at national chains, online, major department stores and our Famous Footwear stores. Suggested retail price points range from $59 for shoes to $189 for boots. We have a license agreement with Santana Tesoro, LLC to sell Carlos by Carlos Santana footwear that expired in December 2018. In March 2019, we decided
to exit the Carlos by Carlos Santana brand.
Via Spiga: Established in 1985, Via Spiga is named after the main street in one of the most famed shopping districts in Milan, Italy. The brand is primarily sold in national chains, online and premier department stores at suggested retail price points from $175 for shoes to $495 for boots.
Blowfish Malibu: In July 2018, we acquired a controlling interest in Blowfish Malibu. Blowfish Malibu, which was founded in 2005, designs and sells women's and children's footwear that captures the fresh youthful spirit and casual living that is distinctively Southern California. The acquisition provides additional exposure to the growing sneaker and casual lifestyle segment of the market. The brand is sold at national chains, our Famous Footwear stores
and independent retailers. Suggested retail price points range from $20 for shoes to $90 for boots.
Diane von Furstenberg: The Diane von Furstenberg (DVF) brand is sold at suggested price points ranging from $198 for shoes to $598 for boots. We had a license agreement with DVF Studio, LLC to produce and distribute the DVF women's shoe collection. During the fourth quarter of 2018, we decided to exit the DVF brand, as further discussed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.
Wholesale
Within our Brand Portfolio segment, our brands are distributed on a wholesale basis to over 3,900 retailers, including national chains, online retailers, department stores, mass merchandisers, independent retailers and catalogs throughout the United
States and Canada, as well as approximately 70 other countries (including sales to our retail operations). Our most significant wholesale customers include Famous Footwear and many of the nation’s largest retailers, including national chains such as DSW, TJX Corporation (including TJ Maxx and Marshalls), Nordstrom Rack and Kohl's; online retailers such as Nordstrom.com, Zappos.com and Amazon.com; department stores such as Nordstrom, Macy’s, and Dillard's; mass merchandisers such as Walmart; and independent retailers such as Qurate Retail Group, which operates both QVC and Home Shopping Network. We also sell product to a variety of international retail customers and distributors. The loss of any one or more of our significant customers could have a material impact on our Brand Portfolio segment and the Company.
Our
Brand Portfolio segment sold approximately 49 million pairs of shoes on a wholesale basis during 2018. We sell footwear to wholesale customers on both a landed and a first-cost basis. Landed sales are those in which we obtain title to the footwear from our overseas suppliers and maintain title until the footwear clears United States customs and is shipped to our wholesale customers. Landed sales generally carry a higher profit rate than first-cost sales as a result of the brand equity associated with the product along with the additional customs, warehousing and logistics services provided to customers and the risks associated with inventory ownership. To allow for the prompt shipment on reorders and satisfy our growing e-commerce demand, we carry inventories of certain styles. First-cost sales are those in which we obtain title to footwear from our overseas suppliers and typically relinquish title to customers at a
designated overseas port. Many of these customers then import this product into the United States.
Products sold under license agreements accounted for approximately 20% of the sales of the Brand Portfolio segment in 2018, 23% of the segment's sales in 2017 and 26% of the segment's sales in 2016. Caleres also receives license revenue from third parties related to certain owned brands, for use in connection with other brand-enhancing non-footwear product categories.
7
Direct-to-Consumer
Our
Brand Portfolio segment also includes retail stores for certain brands, including Naturalizer, Allen Edmonds and Sam Edelman. The number of our Brand Portfolio retail stores at the end of the last three fiscal years was as follows:
2018
2017
2016
Naturalizer
140
145
153
Allen
Edmonds
76
78
69
Sam Edelman
13
13
12
Total
229
236
234
At
the end of 2018, we operated 82 Naturalizer stores in Canada, 57 in the United States and one in Guam. Of the 140 Naturalizer stores, approximately 50% are located in regional malls and average approximately 1,200 square feet in size. The other 50% of stores are located in outlet malls and average approximately 2,300 square feet in size. Total Naturalizer store square footage at the end of 2018 was approximately 253,000, compared to 259,000 in 2017. During 2018,
we operated 75 Allen Edmonds stores in the United States and one store in Italy, each averaging approximately 1,600 square feet. We operated 13 Sam Edelman stores in the United States at the end of 2018, each averaging approximately 2,400 square feet. During 2019, we expect to open three and close 12 Naturalizer stores, close one Allen Edmonds store and anticipate having no openings or closings of Sam Edelman stores.
In connection with our omni-channel approach to reach
consumers, we also operate Naturalizer.com, Naturalizer.ca, SamEdelman.com, AllenEdmonds.com, DrSchollsShoes.com, LifeStride.com, FrancoSarto.com, Vionicshoes.com, Ryka.com, Bzees.com, and ViaSpiga.com, which offer substantially the same product selection to consumers as we sell to our wholesale customers. Vince.com, FergieShoes.com, CarlosShoes.com, Blowfishshoes.com, and DVF.com, complement our distribution of those brands.
References to our website addresses do not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the websites and the information contained on the websites
is not part of this report.
Marketing
We continue to build on the recognition of our portfolio of brands to create differentiation and consumer loyalty. Our marketing teams are responsible for the development and implementation of innovative marketing programs that serve the consumer facing needs of our portfolio of brands as well as that of our retail partners. In 2018, we spent approximately $39.5 million in advertising and marketing support for our Brand Portfolio segment, including digital marketing and social media, consumer media advertising, print, production, trade shows, in-store displays and fixtures and product placement. The marketing teams are also responsible for driving the development of branding and content for our brand
websites. We continually focus on enhancing the effectiveness of these marketing efforts through market research, product development and marketing communications that collectively address the ever-changing lives and needs of our consumers. Our marketing teams are instrumental in continuing to drive growth in e-commerce sales, producing relevant and purpose-driven brand positioning and creating meaningful connections with consumers that have increased awareness and loyalty across our portfolio. We continue to leverage consumer insights and data to inform marketing initiatives to capture a greater share of our target consumers’ spend as well as reach new audiences with a high propensity to purchase our products.
Sourcing and Product Development Operations
Our
sourcing and product development operations source and develop footwear for our Brand Portfolio segment and also a portion of the footwear sold by our Famous Footwear segment. We have sourcing and product development offices in Clayton, Missouri; Putian, China; San Rafael and Culver City, California; New York, New York; Port Washington, Wisconsin; Florence, Italy; Macau; Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Hong Kong and Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Sourcing Operations
In 2018, the sourcing operations sourced approximately 51 million pairs of shoes through a global network of third-party independent footwear manufacturers. The majority of our footwear sourced is provided by approximately 48 manufacturers operating approximately 72 manufacturing facilities. In certain countries, we use agents to facilitate
and manage the development, production and shipment of product. We attribute our ability to achieve consistent quality, competitive prices and on-time delivery to the breadth of these established relationships. While we generally do not have significant contractual commitments with our suppliers, we do enter into sourcing agreements with certain independent sourcing agents. Prior to production, we monitor the quality of all of our footwear components and also inspect the prototypes of each footwear style.
8
In 2018, approximately 66% of the footwear we sourced was from manufacturing facilities in China. The following table provides an overview of our sourcing by country in 2018:
Country
Millions
of Pairs
China
34.0
Vietnam
14.5
Ethiopia
2.1
Other
0.7
Total
51.3
Product
Development Operations
We maintain design and product development teams for our brands in Clayton, Missouri; Putian, China; San Rafael, California; New York, New York; Port Washington, Wisconsin and Culver City, California, as well as other select fashion locations, including Florence, Italy. These teams, which include independent designers, are responsible for the creation and development of new product styles. Our designers monitor trends in fashion footwear and apparel and work closely with retailers to identify consumer footwear preferences. Our design teams create collections of footwear, and our product development and sourcing offices convert those designs into new footwear styles. We operate a sample-making facility in Dongguan, China that allows us to have greater control over our product development in terms of accuracy, execution and speed-to-market. Our long-range plans include a distinct focus on speed and
efficiency to drive excellence in product value and execution, while also continuing to diversify into new sourcing markets outside of China to ensure adequate flexibility in a dynamic economic environment.
Our new distribution center campus in Chino, California, which opened in 2018, is providing additional shipping flexibility, operational efficiencies and an expansion of our logistics infrastructure capacity. In 2019, we plan to automate both facilities, which will provide faster order processing and delivery to customers as we continue to meet omni-channel demands.
Backlog
At February 2, 2019, our Brand Portfolio segment had a backlog of
unfilled wholesale orders of approximately $331.6 million, compared to $262.1 million on February 3, 2018. Most orders are for delivery within the next 90 to 120 days, and although orders are subject to cancellation, we have not experienced significant cancellations in the past. The increase in backlog from the prior year was driven by our 2018 acquisitions of Vionic and Blowfish Malibu. The backlog at any particular time is affected by a number of factors, including seasonality, the continuing trend among customers to reduce the lead time on their orders, capacity shifts at foreign manufacturers, and the volume of e-commerce drop ship orders that are received immediately rather than in advance. Accordingly, a comparison of backlog from period to period may not be indicative of
eventual actual shipments or the growth rate of sales from one period to the next.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Our Internet address is www.caleres.com. Our Internet address is included in this annual report on Form 10-K as an inactive textual reference only. The information contained on our website
is not incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this report. We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. We make available free of charge our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished, as required by Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, through our Internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with or furnish it to the SEC. You may access these SEC filings via the hyperlink to a third-party SEC filings website
that we provide on our website.
The following is a list of the names and ages of the executive officers of the
Company and of the offices held by each person. There is no family relationship between any of the named persons. The terms of the following executive officers will expire in May 2019 or upon their respective successors being chosen and qualified.
Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer
Malcolm
W. Robinson III
58
Division President – Men's and International
John W. Schmidt
58
Division President – Brand Portfolio
Mark A. Schmitt
55
Senior Vice President, Chief Logistics Officer
The period of service of each officer in the positions listed and other business experience are set forth below.
Diane
M. Sullivan, Chairman of the Board of Directors since February 2014. Chief Executive Officer and President since May 2011. President and Chief Operating Officer from March 2006 to May 2011. President from January 2004 to March 2006.
Molly P. Adams, Division President – Famous Footwear since May 2018. Executive Vice President of Global Merchandising and Product Development, Disney Consumer Products and Disney Parks and Resorts from November 2015 to May 2018. Executive Vice President of Global Product Development at Disney Consumer Products, Inc. from May 2012 to November 2015. Senior Vice President of Global Product Development and General Manager of The Disney Store North America from 2010 to 2012. Vice President and General Manager of The Disney Store North America from 2008 to 2010.
Daniel
R. Friedman, Division President – Global Supply Chain since January 2010. Senior Vice President, Product Development and Sourcing from July 2006 to January 2010. Managing Director at Camuto Group, Inc. from 2002 to July 2006.
Kenneth H. Hannah, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer since February 2015. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of JC Penney Company, Inc. from May 2012 to March 2014. Executive Vice President and President–Solar Energy of MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. and had previously served as Executive Vice President and President–Solar Materials from 2009 to 2012. Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. from 2006 to 2009.
Todd
E. Hasty, Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer since March 2019. Vice President, Controller from March 2016 to March 2019. Vice President, Assistant Controller from October 2007 to March 2016.
Willis D. Hill, Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer since September 2018. Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer from August 2017 to September 2018. Senior Vice President, Information Technology from January 2017 to August 2017. Vice President, Retail Information Technology from July 2011 to January 2017. Director, Retail Information Technology from July 2008 to July 2011.
Douglas W. Koch, Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer
since January 2016. Senior Vice President and Chief Talent and Strategy Officer from January 2011 to January 2016. Senior Vice President and Chief Talent Officer from May 2005 to January 2011. Senior Vice President, Human Resources from March 2002 to May 2005.
Malcolm W. Robinson III, Division President – Men's and International since July 2017. Executive Vice President, One Jeanswear Group– William Rast Division from November 2016 to February 2017. Chief Executive Officer and board member, Tommie Copper from July 2013 to August 2014. President, Maidenform Brands from November 2011 to February 2013. Group President of Wholesale Sportswear, Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation from 2002 to November 2011.
10
John
W. Schmidt, Division President – Brand Portfolio since October 2015. Division President – Contemporary Fashion Brands from January 2011 to September 2015. Senior Vice President, Better and Image Brands from January 2010 to January 2011. Senior Vice President and General Manager, Better and Image Brands from March 2008 until January 2010. Various positions, including Vice President, President, Group President of Wholesale Footwear for Nine West Group from September 1998 to February 2008.
Mark A. Schmitt, Senior Vice President, Chief Logistics Officer since September 2018. Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer and Logistics since February 2013. Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer from January 2012 through February 2013. Senior Director of Management Information Systems for Express Scripts from 2010
through 2011. Various management information systems positions including Group Director with Anheuser-Busch InBev from 1996 to 2009.
ITEM 1A
RISK FACTORS
Consumer demand for our products may be adversely impacted by economic conditions and other factors.
Worldwide economic conditions continue to be uncertain. Consumer
confidence and spending are strongly influenced by general economic conditions and other factors, including fiscal policy, the changing tax and regulatory environment, interest rates, minimum wage rates and regulations, inflation, consumer debt levels, the availability of consumer credit, the liquidity of consumers’ assets, health care costs, currency exchange rates, taxation, energy costs, real estate values, foreclosure rates, unemployment trends, weather conditions and the economic consequences of military action or terrorist activities. Negative economic conditions generally decrease disposable income and, consequently, consumer purchases of discretionary items like our products. Negative trends in economic conditions could also drive up the cost of our products, which may require us to increase our product prices. These increases in our product costs, and possibly prices, may not be offset by comparable increases in consumer disposable income. As a result, our
customers may choose to purchase fewer of our products or purchase the lower priced products of our competitors, and our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely affected.
If we are unable to anticipate and respond to consumer preferences and fashion trends and successfully apply new technology, we may not be able to maintain or increase our net sales and earnings.
The footwear industry is subject to rapidly changing consumer shopping preferences and patterns and fashion trends. Our products must appeal to a broad range of consumers whose preferences cannot be predicted with certainty and are subject to rapid change. In addition, the continuing consumer shift to online and mobile shopping is requiring retailers to lower shipping costs, improve shipping speeds and optimize mobile platforms. The
trend toward online and mobile shopping increases the volume of smaller shipments, including single-pair shipments, from our warehouses. The increased volume of smaller shipments may result in higher average distribution costs, including both shipping and processing costs incurred at our distribution centers. The success of both our wholesale and retail operations depends largely on our ability to anticipate, understand and react to these changing consumer shopping patterns. If we fail to respond to changes in consumer shopping patterns, demands and fashion trends, develop new products and designs, and implement effective, responsive merchandising and distribution strategies and programs, we could experience lower sales, excess inventories and lower gross margins, any of which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
We operate in
a highly competitive industry.
Competition is intense in the footwear industry. There has also been consolidation of competitors in the industry, resulting in certain competitors that are larger and have greater financial, marketing and technological resources than we do. Other competitors are able to offer footwear on a lateral basis alongside their apparel products, or have successfully branded their trademarks as lifestyle brands, resulting in greater competitive advantages. Low barriers to entry into this industry further intensify competition by allowing new companies to easily enter the markets in which we compete. Some of our suppliers further compound these competitive pressures by allowing consumers to purchase their products directly through supplier-maintained Internet sites and retail stores. In addition, retailers aggressively compete on the basis of price, which puts competitive pressure on us to keep our
prices low.
We believe that our ability to compete successfully in the footwear industry depends on a number of factors, including style, price, performance, quality, location and service, as well as the strength of our brand names. We remain competitive by increasing awareness of our brands, improving the efficiency of our supply chain and enhancing the style, comfort, fashion and perceived value of our products. However, our competitors may implement more effective marketing campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies, make more attractive offers to potential employees, distribution partners and manufacturers, or respond more quickly to changes in consumer preferences than us. As a result, we may not be able to compete successfully in the future, and increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced gross margins, loss of market share and an inability to
generate cash flows that are sufficient to maintain or expand the development and marketing of our products, which could adversely impact our financial results.
We rely primarily on foreign sources of production, which subjects our business to risks associated with international trade.
11
We rely primarily on foreign sourcing for our footwear products through third-party manufacturing facilities located outside the United States. As is common in the industry, we do not have any long-term contracts with our third-party foreign manufacturers. Foreign sourcing is subject to numerous risks, including
trade relations, work stoppages, transportation delays (including delays at foreign and domestic ports) and costs (including customs duties, quotas, tariffs, anti-dumping duties, safeguard measures, cargo restrictions or other trade restrictions), domestic and foreign political instability, foreign currency fluctuations, variable economic conditions, expropriation, nationalization, natural disasters, terrorist acts and military conflict, changes in governmental regulations (including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act) and geo-political events (including the potential impact of the impending withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union, or "Brexit"). At the same time, potential changes in manufacturing preferences, including, but not limited to the following, pose additional risk and uncertainty:
•
Manufacturing
capacity may shift from footwear to other industries with manufacturing margins that are perceived to be higher.
•
Some footwear manufacturers may face labor shortages as workers seek better wages and working conditions in other industries and locations.
As a result of these risks, there can be no assurance that we will not experience reductions in available production capacity, increases in our product costs, late deliveries or terminations of our supplier relationships. Furthermore, these sourcing risks are compounded by the lack of diversification in the geographic location of our foreign sourcing and manufacturing. With the majority
of our supply originating in China, a substantial portion of our supply could be at risk in the event of any significant negative development related to relations between United States and China.
Although we believe we could find alternative manufacturing sources for the products that we currently source from third-party manufacturing facilities in China or other countries, we may not be able to locate alternative manufacturers on terms as favorable as our current terms, including pricing, payment terms, manufacturing capacity, quality standards and lead times for delivery. In addition, there is substantial competition in the footwear industry for quality footwear manufacturers. Accordingly, our future results will partly depend on our ability to maintain positive working relationships with, and offer competitive terms to, our foreign manufacturers. If supply issues cause us to be unable to provide products consistent with
our standards or manufacture our footwear in an efficient and cost-effective manner, our customers may cancel orders, refuse to accept deliveries or demand reductions in purchase prices, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
The imposition of tariffs on our products may result in higher costs and decreased gross profits.
Recent international events have introduced greater uncertainty with respect to trade wars and tariffs, which may affect trade between the United States and other countries, particularly with China. We rely primarily on foreign sourcing for our footwear through third-party manufacturing facilities located outside the United States, with over 60% of our footwear sourced from manufacturing facilities in China. The imposition of tariffs on imported products may result in an increase in product prices, which may
in turn adversely impact our gross margins if we are unable to pass along the higher costs to the consumer.
Our operating results depend on preparing accurate sales forecasts and properly managing our inventory levels.
Using sales forecasts, we place orders with manufacturers for some of our products prior to the time we receive all of our customers’ orders to minimize purchasing costs, the time necessary to fill customer orders and the risk of non-delivery. We also maintain an inventory of certain products that we anticipate will be in greater demand. At the retail level, we place orders for products many months in advance of our key selling seasons. Adverse economic conditions and rapidly changing consumer preferences can make it difficult for us and our retail customers to accurately forecast product trends in order to match
production with demand. If we fail to accurately assess consumer fashion tastes and the impact of economic factors on consumer spending or to effectively differentiate our retail and wholesale offerings, our inventory levels may exceed customer demand, resulting in inventory write-downs, higher carrying costs, lower gross margins or the sale of excess inventory at discounted prices, which could significantly impact our financial results. Conversely, if we underestimate consumer demand for our products or if our manufacturers fail to supply the quality products that we require in a timely manner, we may experience inventory shortages. Inventory shortages may delay shipments to customers (and possibly require us to offer discounts or costly expedited shipping), negatively impact retailer and distributor relationships, adversely impact our sales results and diminish brand awareness and loyalty.
We
are reliant upon our information technology systems, and any major disruption of these systems could adversely impact our ability to effectively operate our business.
Our computer network and systems are essential to all aspects of our operations, including design, pricing, production, accounting, reporting, forecasting, ordering, manufacturing, transportation, sales and distribution. Our ability to manage and maintain our inventory and to deliver products in a timely manner depends on these systems. If any of these systems fails to operate as expected, we experience problems with transitioning to upgraded or replacement systems, a breach in security occurs or a natural disaster interrupts system
12
functions, we may experience delays
in product fulfillment and reduced efficiency in our operations or be required to expend significant capital to correct the problem, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
A cybersecurity breach may adversely affect our sales and reputation.
We routinely possess sensitive consumer and associate information and periodically provide it to third parties for analysis, benefit distribution or compliance purposes. While we believe we have taken reasonable and appropriate steps to protect that information, hackers and data thieves operate sophisticated, large-scale attacks that could breach our information systems, despite ongoing security measures. In addition, we are required to comply with increasingly complex regulations designed to protect our business and personal data. Any breach of
our network security, a third-party’s network security or failure to comply with applicable regulations may result in (a) the loss of valuable business data and/or our consumers’ or associates’ personal information, (b) increased costs associated with implementing additional protections and processes, (c) a disruption of our business and a loss of sales, (d) negative media attention, (e) damage to our consumer and associate relationships and reputation, and (f) fines or lawsuits.
Customer concentration and other trends in customer behavior may lead to a reduction in or loss of sales.
Our wholesale customers include national chains, online retailers, department stores, mass merchandisers, independent retailers and catalogs. Several of our customers operate multiple department store divisions. Furthermore, we often sell multiple types
of branded, licensed and private-label footwear to these same customers. While we believe purchasing decisions in many cases are made independently by the buyers and merchandisers of each of the customers, a decision by a significant customer to decrease the amount of footwear products purchased from us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
In addition, with the growing trend toward retail trade consolidation, including store count reductions at major retail chains, and consumers' continued shift to online shopping, we and our wholesale customers increasingly depend upon a reduced number of key retailers whose bargaining strength is growing. This consolidation may result in the following adverse consequences:
•
Our
wholesale customers may seek more favorable terms for their purchases of our products, which could limit our ability to raise prices, recoup cost increases or achieve our profit goals.
•
The number of stores that carry our products could decline, thereby exposing us to a greater concentration of accounts receivable risk and negatively impacting our brand visibility.
We also face the following risks with respect to our customers:
•
Our
customers could develop in-house brands or use a higher mix of private-label footwear products, which would negatively impact our sales.
•
As we sell our products to customers and extend credit based on an evaluation of each customer’s financial condition, the financial difficulties of a customer could cause us to stop doing business with that customer, reduce our business with that customer or be unable to collect from that customer.
•
Since we transact primarily in United States dollars, our international customers
could purchase from competitors who will transact business in their local currency.
•
Certain of our major wholesale customers have experienced a significant downturn or disruption in their business. If our remaining customers fail to remain committed to our products or brands or also experience significant downturns or disruptions in their business, then these customers may reduce or discontinue purchases from us.
•
Retailers are directly sourcing more of their products directly from foreign manufacturers and reducing
their reliance on wholesalers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Transitional challenges with acquisitions could result in unexpected expenditures of time and resources.
Periodically, we pursue acquisitions of other companies or businesses, such as our 2016 acquisition of Allen Edmonds and our 2018 acquisitions of Blowfish Malibu and Vionic, as further discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. Although we review the records of acquisition candidates, the review may not reveal all existing or potential problems. As a result, we may not accurately assess the value of the business and may, accordingly, ultimately assume unknown adverse operating conditions and/or unanticipated liabilities. Acquisitions may also cause us to incur debt, write-offs
of goodwill or intangible assets if the business does not perform as well as expected and substantial amortization expenses associated with other intangible assets. We face the risk that the returns on acquisitions will not support the expenditures or indebtedness incurred to acquire or launch such businesses. We also face the risk that we will not be able to integrate acquisitions into our existing operations effectively without substantial expense, delay or other operational or financial problems. Integration may be hindered by, among other things, differing procedures, including internal controls, business practices and technology systems. We may need to allocate more management resources to integration than we planned, which may adversely affect our ability to pursue other profitable activities.
13
A
disruption in the effective functioning of our distribution centers could adversely affect our ability to deliver inventory on a timely basis.
We currently use several distribution centers, which are leased or third-party managed. These distribution centers serve as the source of replenishment of inventory for our footwear stores and e-commerce websites operated by our Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio segments and serve the wholesale operations of our Brand Portfolio segment. Our success depends on our ability to handle the rapid consumer shift to online shopping and single pair shipments, which requires significant capital to operate with a greater level of sophistication and automation, as well as higher processing and distribution costs. We may be unable to successfully manage, negotiate or renew our
third-party distribution center agreements, or we may experience complications with respect to our distribution centers, such as substantial damage to, or destruction of, such facilities due to natural disasters or ineffective information technology systems. In such an event, our other distribution centers may not be able to support the resulting additional distribution demands and we may be unable to locate alternative persons or entities capable of fulfilling our distribution needs, resulting in an adverse effect on our ability to deliver inventory on a timely basis.
Foreign currency fluctuations may result in higher costs and decreased gross profits.
Although we purchase most of our products from foreign manufacturers in United States dollars and otherwise engage in foreign currency hedging transactions, we cannot ensure that we
will not experience cost variations with respect to exchange rate changes. Currency exchange rate fluctuations may also adversely impact third parties who manufacture the Company’s products by making their purchases of raw materials or other production costs more expensive and more difficult to finance, resulting in higher prices and lower margins for the Company, its distributors and licensees.
Changes in tax laws may result in increased volatility in our effective tax rates.
Our financial results are significantly impacted by the effective tax rates of both our domestic and international operations. Our effective income tax rate could be adversely affected by certain
provisions of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Act"), which was enacted in December 2017, that directly affect foreign earnings, such as the global intangible low-taxed income tax ("GILTI") and base-erosion and anti-abuse tax provisions ("BEAT"). Other factors, such as changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in permitted deductions, changes in tax laws, interpretations, policies and treaties and the outcome of income tax audits in various jurisdictions, may result in higher taxes, lower profitability and increased volatility in our financial results.
Our success depends on our ability to retain senior management and recruit and retain other key associates.
Our success depends on our ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified management, administrative, product
development and sales personnel to support existing operations and future growth. In addition, our ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses often depends on our ability to retain incumbent personnel, many of whom possess valuable institutional knowledge and operating experience. Competition for qualified personnel in the footwear industry is intense and we compete for these individuals with other companies that in many cases have superior financial and other resources. The loss of the services of any member of our senior management or key associates, the inability to attract and retain other qualified personnel or the inability to effectively transition positions could adversely affect the sales, design and production of our products as well as the implementation of our strategic initiatives.
Our business, sales and brand value could be harmed by violations of
labor, trade or other laws.
We focus on doing business with those suppliers who share our commitment to responsible business practices and the principles set forth in our Production Code of Conduct (the “PCOC”). By requiring our suppliers to comply with the PCOC, we encourage our suppliers to promote best practices and work toward continual improvement throughout their production operations. The PCOC sets forth standards for working conditions and other matters, including compliance with applicable labor practices, workplace environment and compliance with laws. Although we promote ethical business practices, we do not control our suppliers or their labor practices. A failure by any of our suppliers to adhere to these standards or laws could cause us to incur additional costs for our products or cause negative publicity and harm our business and reputation. We also require our suppliers to meet our standards for
product safety, including compliance with applicable laws and standards with respect to safety issues, including lead content in paint. Failure by any of our suppliers to adhere to product safety standards could lead to a product recall, which may result in critical media coverage, harm our business and reputation, and cause us to incur additional costs.
In addition, if we, or our suppliers or foreign manufacturers, violate United States or foreign trade laws or regulations, we may be subject to additional duties, significant monetary penalties, the seizure and forfeiture of the products we are attempting to import or the loss of our import privileges. Possible violations of United States or foreign laws or regulations could include inadequate record keeping of our imported products, misstatements or errors as to the origin, classification, marketing or valuation of our imported
products, fraudulent visas or labor violations. The effects of these factors could render our conduct of business in a particular country undesirable or impractical and have a negative impact on our operating results.
14
Our retail business depends on our ability to secure affordable and desirable leased locations without creating a competitive concentration of stores.
The success of the retail business within our Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio segments depends, in part, on our ability to secure affordable, long-term leases in desirable locations for our leased retail footwear stores and to secure renewals of such leases. As consumer shopping preferences have evolved, we continue
to focus on opening stores in locations with a greater penetration of high-value consumers. No assurance can be given that we will be able to successfully negotiate lease renewals for existing stores or obtain acceptable terms for new stores in desirable locations. In addition, opening new stores in our existing markets may result in reduced net sales in existing stores as our stores become more concentrated in the markets we serve. As a result, the number of consumers and financial performance of individual stores may decline and the average sales per square foot at our stores may be reduced. This may result in impairments that adversely impact our financial results. As further discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, we will adopt Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 842, Leases, during the first quarter of 2019. Impairment charges related to underperforming retail stores are
expected to be greater under the new standard.
If we are unable to maintain working relationships with our major branded suppliers, our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows may be adversely impacted.
Our Famous Footwear segment purchases a substantial portion of its footwear products from major branded suppliers. Purchases from two major branded suppliers, Nike, Inc. and Skechers USA, Inc., comprise approximately 22% and 10%, respectively, of sales for the Famous Footwear segment. As is common in the industry, we do not have any long-term contracts with our suppliers. In addition, the success of our financial performance is dependent on the ability of our Famous Footwear segment to obtain products from our suppliers
on a timely basis and on acceptable terms. While we believe our relationships with our current suppliers are good, the loss of any of our major suppliers or product developed exclusively for our Famous Footwear stores could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, negative trends in global economic conditions may adversely impact our suppliers. If these third parties do not perform their obligations or are unable to provide us with the materials and services we need at prices and terms that are acceptable to us, our ability to meet our consumers’ demand could be adversely affected.
Our reputation and competitive position are dependent on our ability to license well-recognized brands, license our own brands under successful licensing arrangements and protect our intellectual property rights.
Licenses
- Company as Licensee
Although we own most of our wholesale brands, we also rely on our ability to attract, retain and maintain good relationships with licensors that have strong, well-recognized brands and trademarks. Our license agreements are generally for an initial term of two to four years, subject to renewal, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to renew these licenses. Even our longer-term or renewable licenses are typically dependent upon our ability to market and sell the licensed products at specified levels, and the failure to meet such levels may result in the termination or non-renewal of such licenses. Furthermore, many of our license agreements require minimum royalty payments, and if we are unable to generate sufficient sales and profitability to cover these minimum royalty requirements, we may be required to make additional payments to the licensors that could have a material adverse effect
on our business and results of operations. In addition, because certain of our license agreements are non-exclusive, new or existing competitors may obtain licenses with overlapping product or geographic terms, resulting in increased competition for a particular market.
Licenses - Company as Licensor
We have entered into numerous license agreements with respect to the brands and trademarks that we own. While we have significant control over our licensees’ products and advertising, we generally cannot control their operational and financial issues. If our licensees are not able to meet annual sales and royalty goals, obtain financing, manage their supply chain, control quality and maintain positive relationships with their customers, our business, results of operations and financial position may be adversely affected. While we would
likely have the ability to terminate an underperforming license, it may be difficult and costly to locate an acceptable substitute distributor or licensee, and we may experience a disruption in our sales and brand visibility. In addition, although many of our license agreements prohibit the licensees from entering into licensing arrangements with certain of our competitors, they are generally not prohibited from offering, under other brands, the types of products covered by their license agreements with us.
15
Trademarks
We believe that our trademarks and trade names are important to our success and competitive position because our distinctive marks create a market for our products and
distinguish our products from other products. We cannot, however, guarantee that we will be able to secure protection for our intellectual property in the future or that such protection will be adequate for future operations. Furthermore, we face the risk of ineffective protection of intellectual property rights in jurisdictions where we source and distribute our products, some of which do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the United States. If we are unsuccessful in challenging a party’s products on the basis of infringement of our intellectual property rights, continued sales of these products could adversely affect our sales, devalue our brands and result in a shift in consumer preference away from our products. We may face significant expenses and liability in connection with the protection of our intellectual property rights, and if we are unable to successfully protect our rights or resolve intellectual property conflicts with others,
our business or financial condition could be adversely affected.
Our quarterly sales and earnings may fluctuate, which may result in volatility in, or a decline in, our stock price.
Our quarterly sales and earnings can vary due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:
•
Our Famous Footwear retail business is seasonally weighted to the back-to-school season, which primarily falls in our third fiscal quarter. As a result, the success of our back-to-school offering, which is affected by our ability to anticipate consumer demand and fashion
trends, could have a disproportionate impact on our full year results.
•
In our wholesale business, sales of footwear are dependent on orders from our major customers, and they may change delivery schedules, change the mix of products they order or cancel orders without penalty.
•
Our wholesale customers set the delivery schedule for shipments of our products, which could cause shifts of sales between quarters.
•
Our
estimated annual tax rate is based on projections of our domestic and international operating results for the year, which we review and revise as necessary each quarter.
•
Our earnings are also sensitive to a number of factors that are beyond our control, including manufacturing and transportation costs, changes in product sales mix, geographic sales trends, weather conditions, consumer sentiment and currency exchange rate fluctuations.
As a result of these specific and other general factors, our operating results will vary from quarter to quarter and the results for any particular quarter may not be indicative of results for the full
year. Any shortfall in sales or earnings from the levels expected by investors could cause a decrease in the trading price of our common stock.
We are subject to periodic litigation and other regulatory proceedings, which could result in the unexpected expenditure of time and resources.
We are a defendant from time to time in lawsuits and regulatory actions (including environmental matters) relating to our business and to our past operations. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and regulatory proceedings, we cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of any such proceedings. An unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, regardless of the outcome of any litigation or regulatory proceedings, such proceedings are expensive and will require that we devote substantial resources
and executive time to defend, thereby diverting management’s attention and resources that are needed to successfully run our business. See Item 3, Legal Proceedings, for further discussion of pending matters.
A significant portion of our Famous Footwear sales are dependent on our Famous Footwear loyalty program, Rewards, and any decrease in sales from Rewards could have a material adverse impact on our sales.
Rewards is a customer loyalty program that drives sales and traffic for the Famous Footwear segment. Rewards members earn points toward savings certificates for qualifying purchases. Upon reaching specified point values, members are issued a savings certificate, which may be redeemed for purchases at Famous Footwear. Approximately 76% of our fiscal 2018 sales within the Famous
Footwear segment were generated by our Rewards members. If our Rewards members do not continue to shop at Famous Footwear, our sales may be adversely affected.
Our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely affected by the failure of financial institutions to fulfill their commitments under our Credit Agreement.
The Third Amendment to our Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”), which matures on January 18, 2024, is provided by a syndicate of financial institutions, with each institution agreeing severally (and not jointly) to make revolving credit loans to us in an aggregate amount of up to $500.0 million in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreement. In addition, the Credit Agreement provides
for an increase at the Company's option by up to $250.0 million. If one or more of the financial institutions participating in the Credit Agreement were to default on its obligation to fund its commitment, the portion of the facility provided by such defaulting financial institution might not be available to us.
16
If we are unable to maintain our credit rating, our ability to access capital and interest rates may be negatively impacted.
The credit rating agencies periodically review our capital structure and the quality and stability of our earnings. Any negative ratings actions could constrain the capital
available to us or our industry and could limit our access to long-term funding or cause such access to be available at a higher borrowing cost for our operations. We are dependent upon our ability to access capital at rates and on terms we determine to be attractive. If our ability to access capital becomes constrained, our interest expense will likely increase, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, as of February 2, 2019, total borrowing availability under the Credit Agreement was $154.5 million. Failure to meet our debt covenants under the Credit Agreement may require the Company to seek waivers or amendments of the debt covenants, alternative or additional sources of financing or reduce expenditures.
ITEM
1B
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
There are no unresolved written comments that were received from the SEC staff 180 days or more before the end of our fiscal year relating to our periodic or current reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
ITEM 2
PROPERTIES
We
own our principal executive, sales and administrative offices located in Clayton (“St. Louis”), Missouri.
Our retail operations, included in both our Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio segments, are conducted throughout the United States, Canada, Guam and Italy and involve the operation of 1,221 shoe stores, including 103 in Canada. All store locations, excluding our Perth, Ontario outlet store, are leased, with approximately 43% of them having renewal options. The footwear sold through our domestic wholesale business is primarily processed through our leased distribution centers in Chino, California and Lebanon, Tennessee or our third-party facilities in Vacaville, California and Fontana, California. During 2018, the
Company signed an operating lease for an additional building on the campus of our wholesale distribution center in California. The Company began operating this distribution center in late 2018 and ceased operations with our third-party facility in Chino, California.
17
The following table summarizes the location and general use of the Company's primary properties:
Location
Owned/Leased
Segment
Use
Clayton,
Missouri
Owned
Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio
Principal corporate, executive, sales and administrative offices
United States, Canada, Guam and Italy
Leased
Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio
Retail
operations
Chino, California (1)
Leased
Brand Portfolio
Distribution centers
Lebanon, Tennessee (2)
Leased
Famous
Footwear and Brand Portfolio
Distribution center
Lebec, California (3)
Leased
Famous Footwear
Distribution center
New York, New York
Leased
Brand
Portfolio
Office space and showrooms
Bentonville, Arkansas
Leased
Brand Portfolio
Showrooms
Dallas, Texas
Leased
Brand
Portfolio
Showrooms
Perth, Ontario (4)
Owned
Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio
Distribution center and outlet center
Putian, China; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Florence, Italy; Macau; Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Hong Kong; Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; San Rafael and Culver City, California
Leased
Brand
Portfolio
Office space
Dongguan, China
Leased
Brand Portfolio
Office space and sample-making facility
Santiago, Dominican Republic
Leased
Brand
Portfolio
Manufacturing facility
Port Washington, Wisconsin
Owned
Brand Portfolio
Manufacturing and recrafting facility and office space
(1)
This campus
includes two company-operated distribution centers with approximately 725,000 and 606,000 square feet at each respective location.
(2)
This distribution center is approximately 540,000 square feet.
(3)
This distribution center is approximately 350,000 square feet.
(4)
This distribution center
is approximately 150,000 square feet.
We also own a building in Denver, Colorado, which is leased to a third party; and undeveloped land in Colorado and New York. See Item 3, Legal Proceedings, for further discussion of certain of these properties.
ITEM 3
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We
are involved in legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the outcome of such ordinary course business proceedings and litigation currently pending will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.
Our prior operations included numerous manufacturing and other facilities for which we may have responsibility under various environmental laws to address conditions that may be identified in the future. We are involved in environmental remediation and ongoing compliance activities at several sites and have been notified that we are or may be a potentially responsible party at several other sites. We are remediating, under the oversight of Colorado authorities, contamination at and beneath our owned facility in Colorado (also known as the “Redfield” site) and groundwater
and indoor air in residential neighborhoods adjacent to and near the property, which have been affected by solvents previously used at the site and surrounding facilities.
Refer to Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the Redfield matter and other legal proceedings.
18
ITEM
4
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM
5
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the trading symbol “CAL.” As of February 2, 2019, we had 3,489 shareholders of record.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table provides information relating to our repurchases of common stock during the fourth quarter of 2018:
Includes
shares purchased as part of our publicly announced stock repurchase program and shares that are tendered by employees related to certain share-based awards. The employee shares were tendered in satisfaction of the exercise price of stock options and/or to satisfy tax withholding amounts for non-qualified stock options, restricted stock and stock performance awards.
(2)
On August 25, 2011, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program ("2011 Program") authorizing the repurchase of up to 2,500,000 shares of our outstanding common stock. We can use the repurchase program to repurchase shares on the open market or in private transactions
from time to time, depending on market conditions. Under this plan, 1,223,500 shares were repurchased during 2018. In total, 2,500,000 shares have been repurchased under the program. Therefore, there were no remaining shares authorized to be repurchased under the 2011 Program as of February 2, 2019.
(3)
On December 14, 2018, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program ("2018 Program") authorizing the purchase of up to 2,500,000 shares of our outstanding common stock either on the
open market or in private transactions. Under this plan, 242,149 shares were repurchased during 2018. Therefore, there were 2,257,851 shares authorized to be repurchased under the 2018 Program as of February 2, 2019. Our repurchases of common stock are limited under our debt agreements.
Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest to each January 31. Accordingly, share prices are as of the last business day in each fiscal year. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and each index was $100 at February 1, 2014. The graph also assumes that all dividends were reinvested and that investments were held through February 2,
2019. These indices are included for comparative purposes only and do not necessarily reflect management’s opinion that such indices are an appropriate measure of the relative performance of the stock involved and are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of the common stock.
*$100 invested on February 1, 2014 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Index calculated on daily basis.
The selected financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and the other information contained elsewhere in this report. Our accounting period is based upon a traditional retail calendar, which ends on the Saturday nearest January 31. Periodically, this results in a fiscal year that includes 53 weeks, which can affect annual comparisons. Our 2017 fiscal year included 53 weeks, while our 2018, 2016, 2015 and 2014 fiscal years each included 52 weeks.
20
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
($
thousands, except per share amounts)
(52 Weeks)
(53 Weeks)
(52 Weeks)
(52 Weeks)
(52 Weeks)
Operations:
Net
sales
$
2,834,846
$
2,785,584
$
2,579,388
$
2,577,430
$
2,571,709
Cost
of goods sold
1,678,502
1,616,935
1,517,397
1,529,627
1,531,609
Gross
profit
1,156,344
1,168,649
1,061,991
1,047,803
1,040,100
Selling
and administrative expenses
1,041,765
1,036,051
942,595
931,707
921,364
Impairment
of goodwill and intangible assets (1)
98,044
—
—
—
—
Restructuring
and other special charges, net
16,134
4,915
23,404
—
3,484
Operating
earnings
401
127,683
95,992
116,096
115,252
Interest
expense, net
(18,277
)
(17,325
)
(13,731
)
(15,690
)
(20,066
)
Loss
on early extinguishment of debt
(186
)
—
—
(10,651
)
(420
)
Other
income, net
12,308
12,348
14,993
19,011
10,682
Gain
on sale of subsidiary
—
—
—
—
4,679
(Loss)
earnings before income taxes
(5,754
)
122,706
97,254
108,766
110,127
Income
tax benefit (provision)
273
(35,475
)
(31,168
)
(26,942
)
(27,184
)
Net
(loss) earnings
(5,481
)
87,231
66,086
81,824
82,943
Net
(loss) earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
(40
)
31
428
345
93
Net
(loss) earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc.
$
(5,441
)
$
87,200
$
65,658
$
81,479
$
82,850
Operations:
Return
on net sales
(0.2
)%
3.1
%
2.5
%
3.2
%
3.2
%
Return
on beginning Caleres, Inc. shareholders' equity
(0.8
)%
14.2
%
10.9
%
15.1
%
17.4
%
Dividends
paid
$
11,983
$
12,027
$
12,104
$
12,253
$
12,237
Purchases
of property and equipment
$
62,483
$
44,720
$
50,523
$
73,479
$
44,952
Capitalized
software
$
4,416
$
6,458
$
9,039
$
7,735
$
5,086
Depreciation
and amortization (2)
$
64,907
$
65,831
$
57,857
$
52,606
$
54,015
Per
Common Share:
Basic (loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
$
(0.13
)
$
2.03
$
1.52
$
1.86
$
1.90
Diluted
(loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
(0.13
)
2.02
1.52
1.85
1.89
Dividends
paid
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
Ending
Caleres, Inc. shareholders’ equity (3)
15.14
16.67
14.27
13.78
12.36
Financial
Position:
Receivables, net
$
191,722
$
152,613
$
153,121
$
153,664
$
136,646
Inventories,
net
683,171
569,379
585,764
546,745
543,103
Working
capital
123,111
416,630
316,150
484,766
420,609
Property
and equipment, net
230,784
212,799
219,196
179,010
149,743
Total
assets
1,838,568
1,489,415
1,475,273
1,303,323
1,214,327
Borrowings
under revolving credit agreement
335,000
—
110,000
—
—
Long-term
debt
197,932
197,472
197,003
196,544
196,712
Caleres,
Inc. shareholders’ equity
634,053
717,489
613,117
601,484
540,910
Average
common shares outstanding – basic
41,756
41,801
42,026
42,455
42,071
Average
common shares outstanding – diluted
41,756
41,980
42,181
42,656
42,274
(1)
During
2018, we recognized $98.0 million of impairment charges associated with the goodwill and intangible assets of our Allen Edmonds business. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
(2)
Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation of property and equipment and amortization of capitalized software, intangibles and debt issuance costs and debt discount. The amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount is reflected within interest expense, net in our consolidated statements of earnings and totaled $2.2 million in 2018, $1.8 million in 2017, $1.7 million in 2016, $1.2 million in 2015 and $2.4 million in 2014.
(3)
Ending Caleres, Inc. shareholders' equity
is calculated by dividing Caleres, Inc. shareholders' equity by common shares outstanding at the end of the respective periods.
21
All data presented reflects the fiscal year ended on the Saturday nearest to January 31. Refer to Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for additional information related to the selected financial data above. As further discussed in Note 1 and Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, as a result of the adoption of Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2017-07 in the first quarter of 2018, certain prior period information has been restated to conform to the
current period presentation.
ITEM 7
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Business
Overview
We are a global footwear company with annual net sales of $2.8 billion. Our shoes are worn by people of all ages and our mission is to inspire people to feel great...feet first. We offer the consumer a powerful portfolio of footwear brands. As both a retailer and a wholesaler, we have a perspective on the marketplace that enables us to serve consumers from different vantage points. We believe our diversified business model provides us with synergies by spanning consumer segments, categories and distribution channels. A combination of thoughtful planning and rigorous execution is key to our success in optimizing our business and portfolio of brands. Our business strategy is focused on continued market share gains, growing our e-commerce business and leveraging our recent investments, while remaining focused on changing consumer demand.
Famous
Footwear
Our Famous Footwear segment includes our Famous Footwear stores, Famous.com and FamousFootwear.ca in Canada. Famous Footwear is one of America’s leading family–branded footwear retailers with 992 stores at the end of 2018 and net sales of $1.6 billion in 2018. Our focus for the Famous Footwear segment is on meeting the needs of a well-defined consumer by providing an assortment of trend-right, brand-name fashion and athletic footwear at a great price, coupled with exclusive products.
Brand Portfolio
Our Brand Portfolio segment
is consumer-focused and we believe our success is dependent upon our ability to strengthen consumers’ preference for our brands by offering compelling style, quality, differentiated brand promises and innovative marketing campaigns. The segment is comprised of the Naturalizer, Sam Edelman, Allen Edmonds, Dr. Scholl's Shoes, LifeStride, Franco Sarto, Vince, Vionic, Rykä, Bzees, Fergie, Carlos, Via Spiga, Blowfish Malibu, and Diane von Furstenberg brands. Through these brands, we offer our customers a diversified selection of footwear, each designed and targeted to a specific consumer segment within the marketplace. We are able to showcase many of our brands in our retail stores and online, leveraging our wholesale and retail platforms, sharing consumer insights across our businesses and testing new and innovative products. Our Brand Portfolio segment operates 229 retail stores in the United States, Canada, Guam and Italy
for our Naturalizer, Allen Edmonds and Sam Edelman brands. This segment also includes our e-commerce businesses that sell our branded footwear.
Financial Highlights
The following is a summary of the financial highlights for 2018:
•
Consolidated net sales increased $49.2 million, or 1.8%, to $2,834.8 million in 2018,
compared to $2,785.6 million last year, driven by our 2018 acquisitions of Vionic and Blowfish Malibu, partially offset by lower sales at Famous Footwear, as our 2017 fiscal year included 53 weeks compared to 52 weeks in 2018.
•
Consolidated operating earnings decreased $127.3 million, or 99.7%, to $0.4 million in 2018, compared to $127.7 million last year, primarily driven by an impairment charge of $98.0
million related to goodwill and intangible assets for our Allen Edmonds business, the acquisition and integration-related costs for Vionic and Blowfish Malibu in 2018 and incremental expenses associated with the transition to our new Brand Portfolio warehouse facilities in California.
•
Consolidated net loss attributable to Caleres, Inc. was $5.4 million, or $0.13 per diluted share, in 2018, compared to net earnings of $87.2 million, or $2.02
per diluted share, last year.
The following items should be considered in evaluating the comparability of our 2018 and 2017 results:
•
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets - We incurred impairment charges of $98.0 million ($83.0 million on an after-tax basis, or $1.93 per diluted share) during 2018 for the impairment of goodwill and intangible assets for our Allen Edmonds business. The impairment charges were driven
by several factors, including the decision to change the brand's pricing structure to be less promotional in the future, which resulted in a decline in projected revenue. In addition, rising interest rates and less favorable operating results in 2018 contributed to the need for the impairment charges. There were no corresponding impairment
22
charges last year. See Note 1 and Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to these charges.
•
Acquisition of Vionic - On October
18, 2018, we acquired the Vionic business for $360.7 million, which was funded with borrowings under our revolving credit agreement. Vionic contributed $45.3 million in net sales during the period from acquisition through February 2, 2019. In aggregate, we incurred charges of $13.4 million ($9.9 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.23 per diluted share) during 2018. These charges included $8.9 million of incremental cost of goods sold related to the amortization of the inventory adjustment required for purchase accounting and $4.5 million of acquisition and integration-related costs, which are presented as restructuring and other special charges, net. Refer to Note 2 and Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
•
Acquisition
of Blowfish Malibu – On July 6, 2018, we acquired a controlling interest in Blowfish Malibu. Blowfish Malibu contributed $15.2 million in net sales during the period from acquisition through February 2, 2019 and did not have a material impact on earnings. We incurred charges of $2.0 million ($1.6 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.04 per diluted share) during 2018, including $1.7 million of incremental cost of goods sold related to the amortization of the inventory adjustment required for purchase accounting, and $0.3 million of acquisition and integration-related costs, which are presented as restructuring and other special charges, net. Refer to Note 2 and Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
•
Logistics
transition – During the fourth quarter of 2018, we incurred costs of $4.5 million ($3.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.08 per diluted share) associated with the transition from our third-party operated warehouse in Chino, California to our new company-operated Brand Portfolio warehouse facilities in California, as well as the transition from our Allen Edmonds distribution center in Port Washington, Wisconsin to our existing retail distribution center in Lebanon, Tennessee. In addition to the fourth quarter transition costs, we also incurred approximately $7 million of initial start-up and duplicate expenses earlier in 2018 associated with the distribution center transitions. Refer to Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
•
Acquisition,
integration and reorganization of men's brands – We incurred costs of $5.8 million ($4.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.10 per diluted share) during 2018 related to the integration and reorganization of our men's brands, primarily to consolidate and relocate certain business functions into our St. Louis headquarters and to reduce and optimize manufacturing capacity in our Port Washington, Wisconsin facility. These charges were recorded as restructuring and other special charges, net on the consolidated statements of earnings (loss). During 2017, we incurred costs of $8.9 million ($5.6 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.13 per diluted share) related to the acquisition, integration and reorganization of our men's brands. Approximately $4.9 million related to the amortization of the inventory adjustment required for purchase accounting was included in cost of goods sold, while the remaining $4.0 million was recorded in restructuring and other special charges. Refer
to Note 2 and Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
•
Brand exits – We recently decided to exit two of our Brand Portfolio brands, Diane von Furstenberg ("DVF") and George Brown Bilt ("GBB"). In connection with that decision, we incurred costs of $2.4 million ($1.8 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.04 per diluted share). Of these charges, $1.8 million primarily represents incremental inventory markdowns required to reduce the value of inventory to net realizable value and is presented in cost of goods sold on the statements of earnings (loss) and the remaining $0.6 million for severance and other related costs is presented in restructuring and other special charges. Refer to Note 5 to
the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
•
In December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) was signed into law, making significant changes to the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Changes included, but were not limited to, a corporate tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, the transition of U.S. international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a quasi-territorial tax system and a one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings as of December 31, 2017. Certain states and other international jurisdictions also enacted changes to their tax statutes. The
components of income tax reform, in aggregate across all jurisdictions, resulted in significant adjustments to both our income tax provision and the income tax balances. Refer to Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
•
We adopted ASU 2017-07, Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, during the first quarter of 2018 on a retrospective basis and reclassified $12.3 million of non-service cost components of net periodic benefit income in 2017 to other income, net in the consolidated statements of earnings (loss). For
2018, $12.3 million of non-service costs components is reflected in other income, net. Refer to Note 1 and Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the adoption of this ASU.
•
Our accounting period is based upon a traditional retail calendar, which ends on the Saturday nearest January 31. Periodically, this results in a fiscal year that includes 53 weeks. Our 2017 fiscal year included 53 weeks, while our 2018 fiscal year had only 52 weeks. The difference in the number of weeks included in our fiscal years can affect annual comparisons. The inclusion of
23
the
53rd week in 2017 resulted in an increase to our consolidated net sales of $23.4 million and had an immaterial impact on net earnings.
Outlook for 2019
During 2018, we maintained our financial flexibility and invested in infrastructure to enhance our long-term performance. In 2019, we will drive investment in our digital capabilities to gain even more insight into our consumers and deliver sales growth. At our Brand Portfolio segment, we plan to continue to expand our market share gains by intensifying our focus on consumers, maximizing our speed-to-market and rapidly responding to emerging trends in-season. At our Famous Footwear segment, we will be focused on elevating our product assortment and our marketing, while delivering profitable growth. Our Brand Portfolio net sales are expected to increase in the low to mid-teens percentage range in 2019. In addition, we expect
same-store sales at Famous Footwear will grow in the low to mid single-digit percentage range.
Following are the consolidated results and results by segment for 2018, 2017 and 2016:
CONSOLIDATED
RESULTS
2018
2017
2016
% of
%
of
% of
($ millions)
Net Sales
Net Sales
Net
Sales
Net sales
$
2,834.8
100.0
%
$
2,785.6
100.0
%
$
2,579.4
100.0
%
Cost
of goods sold
1,678.5
59.2
%
1,617.0
58.0
%
1,517.4
58.8
%
Gross
profit
1,156.3
40.8
%
1,168.6
42.0
%
1,062.0
41.2
%
Selling
and administrative expenses
1,041.8
36.7
%
1,036.0
37.2
%
942.6
36.6
%
Impairment
of goodwill and intangible assets
98.0
3.5
%
—
—
%
—
—
%
Restructuring
and other special charges, net
16.1
0.6
%
4.9
0.2
%
23.4
0.9
%
Operating
earnings
0.4
0.0
%
127.7
4.6
%
96.0
3.7
%
Interest
expense, net
(18.3
)
(0.6
)%
(17.3
)
(0.6)
%
(13.7
)
(0.5)
%
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
(0.2
)
(0.0
)%
—
—
%
—
—
%
Other
income, net
12.3
0.4
%
12.3
0.4
%
15.0
0.6
%
(Loss)
earnings before income taxes
(5.8
)
(0.2
)%
122.7
4.4
%
97.3
3.8
%
Income
tax benefit (provision)
0.3
0.0
%
(35.5
)
(1.3)
%
(31.2
)
(1.2)
%
Net (loss) earnings
(5.5
)
(0.2
)%
87.2
3.1
%
66.1
2.6
%
Net
(loss) earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
(0.1
)
(0.0
)%
0.0
0.0
%
0.4
0.0
%
Net
(loss) earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc.
$
(5.4
)
(0.2
)%
$
87.2
3.1
%
$
65.7
2.6
%
Net
Sales
Net sales increased $49.2 million, or 1.8%, to $2,834.8 million in 2018, compared to $2,785.6 million last year. Our Brand Portfolio segment reported an $80.0 million, or 7.0%, increase in net sales, driven by sales from our acquisitions of Vionic in October 2018 and Blowfish Malibu in July 2018, which contributed $45.3 million and $15.2 million in net sales, respectively, for 2018. The Brand Portfolio increase also reflects higher net sales of our Sam Edelman, Franco Sarto and LifeStride brands, partially offset by lower sales from Allen Edmonds. Net sales
of our Famous Footwear segment decreased $30.8 million, or 1.9%, driven by the impact of having a 53-week fiscal year in 2017, which increased net sales by $19.7 million last year.
Net sales increased $206.2 million, or 8.0%, to $2,785.6 million in 2017, compared to $2,579.4 million in 2016. Our Brand Portfolio segment reported a $158.7 million, or 16.0%, increase in net sales,
reflecting a $154.3 million increase in sales from the Allen Edmonds business we acquired in December 2016 and sales growth from our Sam Edelman, LifeStride, Vince and Naturalizer brands, partially offset by lower sales from our Via Spiga, Franco Sarto and Carlos brands. Net sales of our Famous Footwear segment increased $47.5 million, or 3.0%, primarily driven by a 1.4% increase in same-store sales (on a 52-week basis) and the impact of the 53rd week in 2017, which increased our consolidated net sales by $19.7 million.
Same-store sales changes are calculated by comparing the sales in stores that have been open at least 13 months to the comparable retail calendar weeks in the prior year. Relocated
stores are treated as new stores, and closed stores are excluded from the calculation. Sales change from new and closed stores, net, reflects the change in net sales due to stores that have been opened or closed during the period and are thereby excluded from the same-store sales calculation. E-commerce sales for those websites that function as an extension of a retail chain are included in the same-store sales calculation.
24
Gross Profit
Gross profit decreased $12.3 million, or 1.1%,
to $1,156.3 million in 2018, compared to $1,168.6 million in 2017, driven by the competitive and highly promotional environment. As a percentage of net sales, our gross profit rate decreased to 40.8% in 2018, compared to 42.0% in 2017, reflecting the promotional retail environment and a higher mix of e-commerce business. Our e-commerce sales generally result in lower margins than traditional retail sales as a result of the incremental freight expenses. Cost of goods sold in 2018 also includes special charges of $10.6 million related to the amortization of the inventory adjustments required by purchase accounting
from our recent Vionic and Blowfish Malibu acquisitions and $1.8 million of incremental cost of goods sold associated with the decision to exit our DVF and GBB brands, compared to special charges of $4.9 million in 2017 related to the amortization of the inventory adjustment from our Allen Edmonds acquisition. We also experienced a higher mix of our wholesale versus retail sales. Retail and wholesale net sales were 65% and 35%, respectively, in 2018 compared to 69% and 31% in 2017.
Gross profit increased $106.6 million, or 10.0%, to $1,168.6 million in 2017, compared to $1,062.0 million
in 2016 reflecting higher sales volume, primarily driven by the inclusion of a full year of sales from our Allen Edmonds business, and the impact of the 53rd week in 2017. As a percentage of net sales, our gross profit rate increased to 42.0% in 2017, compared to 41.2% in 2016, primarily resulting from an improved mix of our retail versus wholesale sales and a better mix of higher margin brands within our Brand Portfolio segment. In aggregate, retail and wholesale net sales were 69% and 31%, respectively, in 2017 compared to 67% and 33% in 2016. These improvements were partially offset by $4.9 million of
incremental cost of goods sold in 2017 related to the amortization of the inventory adjustment required for purchase accounting from our Allen Edmonds acquisition in December 2016, compared to $1.2 million in 2016.
We classify warehousing, distribution, sourcing and other inventory procurement costs in selling and administrative expenses. Accordingly, our gross profit and selling and administrative expenses, as a percentage of net sales, may not be comparable to other companies.
Selling and Administrative Expenses
Selling and administrative expenses increased $5.8 million, or 0.6%, to $1,041.8 million in
2018, compared to $1,036.0 million last year, reflecting additional expenses associated with our acquired Vionic and Blowfish Malibu brands, including $3.0 million of incremental amortization of intangible assets, and start-up and duplicate expenses associated with the transition to a new company-operated Brand Portfolio distribution center, partially offset by lower rent and facilities expenses attributable to our smaller store base and the impact of the 53rd week in 2017. As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses decreased to 36.7% in 2018 from 37.2% last year.
Selling and administrative expenses increased $93.4
million, or 9.9%, to $1,036.0 million in 2017, compared to $942.6 million in 2016 primarily driven by higher costs associated with our expanded store base, reflecting the impact of our Allen Edmonds business, incremental expenses associated with the 53rd week and higher cash and stock-based incentive compensation. As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses were 37.2% in 2017 and 36.6% in 2016.
Impairment of Goodwill and Intangible Assets
We
recognized impairment charges of $98.0 million ($83.0 million on an after-tax basis, or $1.93 per diluted share) during 2018 for the impairment of goodwill and the tradename associated with our Allen Edmonds business. The impairment charges were primarily driven by the decision to change the brand's pricing structure to be less promotional in the future, which resulted in a decline in projected revenue. In addition, rising interest rates and less favorable operating results in 2018 contributed to the need for the impairment charges. There were no corresponding impairment charges in 2017 or 2016. Refer to Note 1 and Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to these charges.
Restructuring and Other
Special Charges, Net
Restructuring and other special charges were $16.1 million in 2018, compared to $4.9 million in 2017 as follows:
•
$5.8 million ($4.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.10 per diluted share) for integration and reorganization costs related to our men's business, compared to $4.0 million ($2.6 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.06 per diluted share) in 2017;
•
Acquisition
and integration-related costs of $4.5 million ($3.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.08 per diluted share) for Vionic and $0.3 million ($0.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.01 per diluted share) for Blowfish Malibu;
•
Transition costs related to our distribution centers of $4.5 million ($3.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.08 per diluted share);
•
Brand Portfolio brand
exit costs of $0.6 million ($0.5 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.01 per diluted share); and
•
Costs associated with the restructuring of our retail operations of $0.4 million ($0.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.01 per diluted share), compared to $0.9 million ($0.6 million on after-tax basis, or $0.02 per diluted share) in 2017.
25
The nature of the above charges are more fully described in the Financial Highlights section above as
well as Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.
During 2016, we incurred restructuring and other special charges of $23.4 million related to the impairment of the Shoes.com note receivable, the impairment of our investment in a nonconsolidated affiliate, the acquisition and integration of Allen Edmonds, the planned exit of our China e-commerce business and other organizational changes within our Brand Portfolio segment. Refer to Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to these charges.
Operating Earnings
Operating earnings decreased $127.3 million, or 99.7%,
to $0.4 million in 2018, compared to $127.7 million last year, primarily reflecting the $98.0 million impairment charge related to goodwill and intangible assets in 2018 and the higher restructuring and other special charges noted above.
Operating earnings increased $31.7 million, or 33.0%, to $127.7 million in 2017, compared to $96.0 million in 2016, primarily reflecting the full year impact of the Allen Edmonds business in
2017, as well as improved operating results at Famous Footwear.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net increased $1.0 million, or 5.5%, to $18.3 million in 2018, compared to $17.3 million last year, reflecting higher interest expense on our revolving credit agreement. We used our revolving credit agreement to fund the acquisition of Vionic in the third quarter of 2018. In 2017, our interest expense related primarily to the borrowings for the Allen Edmonds acquisition which was fully paid off in the fourth quarter of 2017. We anticipate higher interest expense going forward until we pay down the revolving
credit agreement.
Interest expense, net increased $3.6 million, or 26.2%, to $17.3 million in 2017, compared to $13.7 million in 2016, reflecting higher interest expense on our revolving credit agreement, which was used to fund the acquisition of Allen Edmonds in the fourth quarter of 2016 and fully paid off in 2017. In addition, we capitalized interest of $1.4 million in 2016 associated with the expansion and modernization of our Lebanon, Tennessee distribution center, with no interest capitalized in 2017.
Loss
on Early Extinguishment of Debt
In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company incurred a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $0.2 million related to the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement ("Former Credit Agreement") prior to maturity. There were no corresponding losses in 2017 or 2016. Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to this charge.
Other Income, Net
During the first quarter of 2018, we adopted ASU 2017-07, Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and
Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which requires the non-service cost components of pension and other postretirement benefit income to be included in non-operating income, as further discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. As a result of the retrospective adoption of the ASU, we reclassified $12.3 million and $15.0 million of non-service cost components of net periodic benefit income in 2017 and 2016, respectively, to other income, net in the consolidated statements of earnings. Refer to Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to our retirement plans.
Income
Tax Benefit (Provision)
Our consolidated effective tax rate was 4.7% in 2018, compared to 28.9% in 2017 and 32.0% in 2016. In 2018, our effective tax rate was impacted by several factors, including the non-deductibility of our goodwill impairment charge of $38.0 million, as further discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements. In addition, discrete tax benefits totaling $5.9 million were recognized in 2018, primarily reflecting adjustments associated with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Act") and related actions for state and other international jurisdictions (in aggregate, "income tax reform"). Refer to further discussion in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements. In addition, our foreign earnings are
generally subject to lower tax rates and therefore a higher mix of foreign earnings also results in a lower consolidated effective tax rate. If the discrete tax benefits and the impairment charges had not been recognized, the Company's 2018 effective tax rate would have been 22.3%, which is lower than prior periods due to the lower tax rates associated with income tax reform effective beginning in 2018.
Our discrete tax benefits last year included $1.3 million related to share-based compensation as a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 during 2017, which required prospective recognition of excess tax benefits and deficiencies in the statements of earnings (loss). If the discrete tax benefits had not
been recognized, the Company's full fiscal year 2017 effective tax rate would have been 30.8%, which is lower than 2016, reflecting a higher mix of international earnings in the Company's lowest tax rate jurisdictions and the impact of income tax reform.
26
Refer to Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding our tax rates.
Net (Loss) Earnings Attributable to Caleres, Inc.
Consolidated net
loss attributable to Caleres, Inc. was $5.4 million in 2018, compared to net earnings of $87.2 million last year and $65.7 million in 2016.
Geographic Results
We have both domestic and foreign operations. Domestic operations include the nationwide operation of our Famous Footwear and other branded retail footwear stores, the wholesale distribution of footwear to numerous retail consumers and the operation of our e-commerce websites. Foreign operations primarily consist of wholesale operations
in the Far East and Canada, retail operations in Canada and Italy and the operation of our international e-commerce websites. In addition, we license certain of our trademarks to third parties who distribute and/or operate retail locations internationally. The Far East operations include first-cost transactions, where footwear is sold at foreign ports to customers who then import the footwear into the United States and other countries. The breakdown of domestic and foreign net sales and earnings before income taxes is as follows:
2018
2017
2016
Earnings
(Loss) Before
Earnings Before
Earnings Before
($ millions)
Net Sales
Income
Taxes
Net Sales
Income Taxes
Net Sales
Income Taxes
Domestic
$
2,656.9
$
40.0
$
2,611.5
$
78.2
$
2,385.1
$
60.9
Foreign
177.9
(45.8
)
174.1
44.5
194.3
36.4
$
2,834.8
$
(5.8
)
$
2,785.6
$
122.7
$
2,579.4
$
97.3
As
a percentage of sales, the pre-tax profitability on foreign sales is higher than on domestic sales because of a lower cost structure and the inclusion of the unallocated corporate administrative and other costs in domestic earnings. In 2018, our foreign earnings were impacted by the goodwill and tradename impairment charges described earlier.
27
FAMOUS
FOOTWEAR
2018
2017
2016
% of
%
of
% of
($ millions)
Net Sales
Net Sales
Net
Sales
Net sales
$
1,606.8
100.0
%
$
1,637.6
100.0
%
$
1,590.1
100.0
%
Cost
of goods sold
916.0
57.0
%
913.2
55.8
%
887.5
55.8
%
Gross
profit
690.8
43.0
%
724.4
44.2
%
702.6
44.2
%
Selling
and administrative expenses
605.1
37.7
%
631.6
38.6
%
618.9
38.9
%
Restructuring
and other special charges, net
0.4
0.0
%
0.6
0.0
%
—
—
%
Operating
earnings
$
85.3
5.3
%
$
92.2
5.6
%
$
83.7
5.3
%
Key
Metrics
Same-store sales % change (on a 52-week basis)
1.5
%
1.4
%
0.6
%
Same-store
sales $ change (on a 52-week basis)
$
23.8
$
21.7
$
9.7
Sales
change from 53rd week
$
(19.7
)
$
19.7
$
—
Sales
change from new and closed stores, net (on a 52-week basis)
$
(34.5
)
$
5.5
$
7.9
Impact
of changes in Canadian exchange rate on sales
$
(0.4
)
$
0.6
$
(0.2
)
Sales
per square foot, excluding e-commerce (on a 52-week basis)
$
220
$
218
$
216
Square
footage (thousands sq. ft.)
6,552
6,972
6,986
Stores
opened
17
34
49
Stores closed
51
63
40
Ending
stores
992
1,026
1,055
Net
Sales
Net sales decreased $30.8 million, or 1.9%, to $1,606.8 million in 2018, compared to $1,637.6 million last year, primarily driven by a decrease in our store base, which resulted in a $34.5 million decrease in sales from new and closed stores, and a $19.7 million decrease due to the inclusion of the 53rd week in 2017. Since 2016, we have had net closures of 63 stores, or 6%, as we continue to focus on optimizing our store base and eliminating underperforming locations. These decreases were partially offset by growth in same-store sales, which uses comparable retail calendar weeks from the prior year, of 1.5% and continued growth in e-commerce sales. Famous Footwear experienced strong growth
in sales of lifestyle athletic product and positive trends in sandals and boots, partially offset by weakness in some of our core athletic brands. Sales per square foot, excluding e-commerce, increased 1.1% to $220, compared to $218 last year. Members of Rewards, our customer loyalty program, continue to account for a majority of the segment's sales, with approximately 76% of our net sales to Rewards members in 2018 and 75% in 2017 and 2016. In early 2019, we introduced a new Rewards program, "Famously You Rewards", that we believe will increase membership, improve the frequency of store and online visits and allow the consumer to move more seamlessly between the store and online shopping
experience.
Net sales increased $47.5 million, or 3.0%, to $1,637.6 million in 2017, compared to $1,590.1 million in 2016. The increase was primarily driven by a 1.4% increase in same-store sales and the impact of the 53rd week in 2017. Famous Footwear experienced growth in e-commerce sales and reported improvement in the online conversion rate, due in part to the successful implementation of our buy online, pick up in store initiative in early 2017. Strong e-commerce sales were partially offset by a decline in customer traffic at our retail store locations. The
segment experienced sales growth in lifestyle athletic and sport-influenced product. Sales per square foot, excluding e-commerce, increased 1.1% to $218, compared to $216 in 2016.
28
Gross Profit
Gross profit decreased $33.6 million, or 4.6%, to $690.8 million in 2018, compared to $724.4 million in 2017,
reflecting lower net sales and a lower gross profit rate, driven by a more competitive and promotional retail environment. As a percentage of net sales, our gross profit rate decreased to 43.0% in 2018, compared to 44.2% in 2017, reflecting a shift in product mix from higher margin performance athletics to lower margin lifestyle athletics. In addition, we experienced a significant increase in our e-commerce business. Our e-commerce sales generally result in lower margins than traditional retail sales as a result of the incremental freight expenses. We expect the trend toward a higher mix of e-commerce sales to continue.
Gross profit increased $21.8 million,
or 3.1%, to $724.4 million in 2017, compared to $702.6 million in 2016 due to higher net sales. As a percentage of net sales, our gross profit rate remained consistent at 44.2%. During 2017, our gross profit rate was positively impacted by higher product margins, offset by higher promotional point redemptions by our Rewards members, due to the growth of that program.
Selling and Administrative Expenses
Selling and administrative expenses decreased $26.5 million, or 4.2%,
to $605.1 million during 2018, compared to $631.6 million last year. The decrease was driven by lower rent and facilities expense attributable to our smaller store base and the impact of the incremental week of expenses associated with the 53rd week in 2017. As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses decreased to 37.7% in 2018 from 38.6% last year.
Selling and administrative expenses increased $12.7 million, or 2.1%, to $631.6 million during 2017,
compared to $618.9 million in 2016. The increase was primarily driven by an incremental week of expenses associated with the 53rd week in 2017 and higher expenses related to cash-based incentive compensation, partially offset by lower marketing costs. As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses decreased to 38.6% in 2017 from 38.9% in 2016.
Restructuring and Other Special Charges, Net
We incurred restructuring and other special charges of $0.4 million and $0.6 million
in 2018 and 2017, respectively, related to the restructuring of our retail operations, as further discussed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements. There were no corresponding costs in 2016.
Operating Earnings
Operating earnings decreased $6.9 million, or 7.5%, to $85.3 million for 2018, compared to $92.2 million last year, reflecting lower net sales and the other factors described above. As a percentage of net sales, our operating earnings decreased slightly
to 5.3% for 2018 from 5.6% for 2017.
Operating earnings increased $8.5 million, or 10.1%, to $92.2 million for 2017, compared to $83.7 million in 2016. As a percentage of net sales, our operating earnings increased to 5.6% for 2017, compared to 5.3% for 2016.
29
BRAND
PORTFOLIO
2018
2017
2016
% of
%
of
% of
($ millions)
Net Sales
Net Sales
Net
Sales
Net sales
$
1,228.0
100.0
%
$
1,148.0
100.0
%
$
989.3
100.0
%
Cost
of goods sold
762.5
62.1
%
703.8
61.3
%
629.9
63.7
%
Gross
profit
465.5
37.9
%
444.2
38.7
%
359.4
36.3
%
Selling
and administrative expenses
399.1
32.5
%
362.4
31.6
%
279.3
28.2
%
Impairment
of goodwill and intangible assets
98.0
8.0
%
—
—
%
—
—
%
Restructuring
and other special charges, net
10.6
0.8
%
1.6
0.1
%
3.9
0.4
%
Operating
(loss) earnings
$
(42.2
)
(3.4
)%
$
80.2
7.0
%
$
76.2
7.7
%
Key
Metrics
Direct-to-consumer (% of net sales) (1)
29
%
26
%
19
%
Wholesale/retail
sales mix (%)
80%/20%
74%/26%
85%/15%
Change in wholesale
net sales ($) (2)
$
85.7
$
(1.7
)
$
(38.4
)
Unfilled
order position at year-end
$
331.6
$
262.1
$
263.1
Same-store
sales % change (on a 52-week basis) (3)
(0.1
)%
6.4
%
(2.9
)%
Same-store
sales $ change (on a 52-week basis) (3)
$
(0.1
)
$
7.5
$
(3.4
)
Sales
change from 53rd week
$
(3.7
)
$
3.7
$
—
Sales
change from new and closed stores, net (on a 52-week basis)
$
(1.3
)
$
22.2
$
7.8
Sales
change from acquired Allen Edmonds retail stores (on a 52-week basis) (4)
N/A
$
126.0
$
19.3
Impact
of changes in Canadian exchange rate on retail sales
$
(0.6
)
$
1.0
$
(0.8
)
Sales
per square foot, excluding e-commerce (on a 52-week basis) (3)
$
417
$
327
$
314
Square
footage, end of year (thousands sq. ft.)
394
405
409
Stores
opened
7
15
77
Stores closed
14
13
8
Ending
stores
229
236
234
(1) Direct-to-consumer
includes sales of our retail stores and e-commerce sites, sales to online-only retailers and sales through customers’ websites that we fulfill on a drop-ship basis.
(2)
The 2018 wholesale net sales change includes sales from our acquired Vionic and Blowfish Malibu brands of $45.3 million and $15.2 million, respectively.
(3) Because these metrics require stores to be included in our results for 13 continuous months, the calculations for 2017 and 2016 exclude our Allen Edmonds business, which was acquired in December 2016.
(4)
This
metric represents net sales from our 69 acquired Allen Edmonds retail stores for 2017 and 2016. The sales change from these retail stores for 2018 is included in the same-store sales metric.
Net Sales
Net sales increased $80.0 million, or 7.0%, to $1,228.0 million in 2018, compared to $1,148.0 million last year. The increase primarily reflects our acquisitions of Vionic in October 2018 and Blowfish Malibu in July 2018, which contributed $45.3 million and $15.2 million in net sales, respectively, for 2018. We
also experienced higher net sales of our Sam Edelman, Franco Sarto and LifeStride brands, partially offset by lower sales from Allen Edmonds and the impact of the 53rd week in 2017. We opened seven stores and closed 14 stores during 2018, resulting in a total of 229 stores at the end of 2018. Sales per square foot, excluding e-commerce, increased 27.8% to $417, compared
30
to $327 last year, primarily driven by the
inclusion of the Allen Edmonds retail stores in this metric for 2018. Our unfilled order position for our wholesale business increased $69.5 million, or 26.5%, to $331.6 million at the end of 2018, compared to $262.1 million at the end of last year, primarily due to the inclusion of $94.5 million from our recently acquired brands, Vionic and Blowfish Malibu.
Net sales increased $158.7 million, or 16.0%, to $1,148.0 million in 2017, compared to $989.3
million in 2016. The increase was driven by higher net sales of $154.3 million from our Allen Edmonds business, which was acquired in the fourth quarter of 2016, and higher net sales of our Sam Edelman, LifeStride, Vince and Naturalizer brands, partially offset by lower sales from our Via Spiga, Franco Sarto and Carlos brands. Our retail net sales benefited from our acquired Allen Edmonds retail stores, a net increase in new and closed stores, an increase in same-store sales of 6.4% and the impact of the 53rd week in 2017. We opened 15 stores and closed 13 stores during 2017, resulting in a total of 236 stores at the end of 2017. Sales per square foot, excluding e-commerce,
increased 3.9% to $327, compared to $314 in 2016. Our unfilled order position for our wholesale sales decreased $1.0 million, or 0.4%, to $262.1 million at the end of 2017, compared to $263.1 million at the end of 2016.
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased $21.3 million, or 4.8%, to $465.5
million in 2018, compared to $444.2 million last year, primarily reflecting net sales growth, partially offset by the incremental cost of goods sold related to purchase accounting inventory adjustments and incremental markdowns related to the brands we decided to exit. In 2018, the Brand Portfolio segment recognized $10.6 million ($7.9 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.18 per diluted share) of incremental cost of goods sold related to purchase accounting inventory adjustments, as further discussed in the Overview section above, compared to $4.9 million ($3.0 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.07 per diluted share) in 2017. The segment also recognized $1.8 million ($1.3
million on an after-tax basis, or $0.03 per diluted share) of incremental cost of goods sold associated with the decision to exit our DVF and GBB brands. As a percentage of sales, our gross profit rate decreased to 37.9% in 2018, compared to 38.7% last year, reflecting higher markdowns and allowances as a result of a more promotional retail environment, incremental cost of goods sold and a higher mix of wholesale versus retail sales. Traditionally, our wholesale operations have a lower gross profit rate than our retail business. In addition, our growing mix of e-commerce business results in lower margins due to the incremental freight expenses.
Gross profit increased $84.8 million, or 23.6%,
to $444.2 million in 2017, compared to $359.4 million in 2016, primarily as a result of the Allen Edmonds business we acquired in 2016. As a percentage of sales, our gross profit rate increased to 38.7% in 2017, compared to 36.3% in 2016 primarily resulting from a higher mix of retail versus wholesale sales in 2017. The Brand Portfolio segment recognized $4.9 million ($3.0 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.07 per diluted share) in cost of goods sold during 2017 related
to the amortization of the Allen Edmonds inventory fair value adjustment required for purchase accounting, compared to $1.2 million in 2016.
Selling and Administrative Expenses
Selling and administrative expenses increased $36.7 million, or 10.1%, to $399.1 million during 2018, compared to $362.4 million last year, driven by expenses related to our recently acquired Vionic and Blowfish Malibu businesses, including $3.0 million of incremental amortization of intangible assets, and approximately $7 million of initial start-up and duplicate expenses associated with
our transition in early 2018 to a new company-operated distribution center. Strong growth in e-commerce sales has also driven freight and warehouse expenses higher and we expect this trend to continue. These increases were partially offset by the impact of incremental expenses in 2017 associated with the 53-week fiscal year. As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses increased to 32.5% in 2018 from 31.6% last year, reflecting the above named factors.
Selling and administrative expenses increased $83.1 million, or 29.8%, to $362.4 million during 2017,
compared to $279.3 million in 2016, primarily driven by higher costs associated with our expanded store base, reflecting the impact of our Allen Edmonds business, higher anticipated payments under our cash-based incentive plans and incremental expenses associated with the 53rd week. As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses increased to 31.6% in 2017 from 28.2% in 2016, reflecting the above named factors.
Impairment of Goodwill and Intangible Assets
We incurred impairment charges of $98.0 million
during 2018 for the impairment of goodwill and the tradename for our Allen Edmonds business. The impairment charges were driven by several factors, including the decision to change the brand's pricing structure to be less promotional in the future, which resulted in a decline in projected revenue. In addition, rising interest rates and less favorable operating results in 2018 contributed to the need for the impairment charges. There were no corresponding impairment charges in 2017 or 2016. See Note 1 and Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the impairment.
Restructuring and Other Special Charges, Net
Restructuring and other special charges of $10.6 million
in 2018 were comprised of $5.4 million for the integration and reorganization of our men's brands, $4.5 million of expenses related to the transition of two of our distribution centers and $0.6 million of costs associated
31
with the decision to exit the DVF and GBB brands. In 2017, restructuring and other special charges of $1.6 million were attributable to the integration and reorganization of our men's business and restructuring of our retail operations. In 2016,
restructuring and other special charges of $3.9 million were attributable to business exit and restructuring charges, certain Allen Edmonds acquisition and integration costs and other charges. Refer to Note 2 and Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to these charges.
Operating (Loss) Earnings
Operating loss was $42.2 million in 2018, compared to earnings of $80.2 million last year, reflecting the $98.0 million impairment of goodwill and intangible assets and other factors described above. As a percentage of net sales, our operating loss was 3.4%
in 2018, compared to operating earnings of 7.0% last year.
Operating earnings increased $4.0 million, or 5.2%, to $80.2 million in 2017, compared to $76.2 million in 2016, primarily reflecting the full year impact of our Allen Edmonds business, net of the incremental cost of goods sold adjustment of $4.9 million related to purchase accounting and other factors described above. As a percentage of net sales, operating earnings increased to 7.0% in 2017,
compared to 7.7% in 2016.
OTHER
The Other category includes unallocated corporate administrative and other costs and recoveries. Costs of $42.7 million, $44.8 million, and $64.0 million were incurred in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The
$2.1 million decrease in costs in 2018 compared to last year was primarily a result of the following factors:
•
An improvement in our medical claims expense, for which we are self-insured, and
•
Lower professional fees; partially offset by
•
Acquisition
and integration-related costs for Vionic and Blowfish Malibu of $4.8 million, compared to costs of $2.5 million for the integration and reorganization of our men's brands in 2017. Refer to Note 2 and Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
The $19.2 million decrease in costs in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily a result of the following factors:
•
The non-recurrence of the $7.3 million impairment of the Shoes.com note receivable in
2016, as further discussed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements;
•
The non-recurrence of the $7.0 million impairment of the investment in a nonconsolidated affiliate in 2016, as further discussed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements; and
•
Lower costs associated with our acquisition and integration of Allen Edmonds in 2016, as further discussed in Note 2 and Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.
RESTRUCTURING
AND OTHER INITIATIVES
During 2018, we incurred restructuring and other special charges of $16.1 million, including $5.8 million related to the integration and reorganization of our men's business, $4.5 million associated with the transition of two of our distribution centers, $4.5 million of acquisition and integration-related costs for Vionic, $0.6 million related to the decision to exit our DVF and GBB brands, $0.4 million related to the restructuring of our retail operations, and $0.3 million of acquisition and integration-related costs for Blowfish Malibu.
During
2017, we incurred restructuring and other special charges of $4.9 million, including $4.0 million related to the integration and reorganization of our men's business and $0.9 million associated with the restructuring of our retail operations.
During 2016, we incurred restructuring and other special charges of $23.4 million, including $8.0 million primarily related to the impairment of the Shoes.com note receivable, $7.0 million related to the impairment of our investment in a nonconsolidated affiliate, $5.8 million of costs associated with the acquisition and
integration of Allen Edmonds, and $2.6 million of costs associated with the planned exit of our international e-commerce business and other restructuring.
Refer to the Financial Highlights section above and Note 2 and Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to these charges.
32
IMPACT
OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES
While we have felt the effects of inflation on our business and results of operations, it has not had a significant impact over the last three years. Inflation can have a long-term impact on our business because increasing costs of materials and labor may impact our ability to maintain satisfactory profit rates. For example, our products are manufactured in other countries, and a decline in the value of the U.S. dollar and the impact of labor shortages in China or other countries may result in higher manufacturing costs. Similarly, any potential significant shortage of quantities or increases in the cost of the materials that are used in our manufacturing process, such as leather and other materials or resources, could have a material negative impact on our business and results of operations. In addition, inflation is often accompanied by higher interest rates,
which could have a negative impact on consumer spending, in which case our net sales and profit rates could decrease. Moreover, increases in inflation may not be matched by increases in wages, which also could have a negative impact on consumer spending. If we incur increased costs that are unable to be recovered through price increases, or if consumer spending decreases generally, our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows may be adversely affected. In an effort to mitigate the impact of these incremental costs on our operating results, we expect to pass on some portion of the cost increases to our consumers and adjust our business model, as appropriate, to minimize the impact of higher costs. Further discussion of the potential impact of inflation and changing prices is included in Item 1A, Risk Factors.
Total
debt obligations increased $335.4 million to $532.9 million at the end of 2018, compared to $197.5 million at the end of last year, reflecting higher borrowings under our revolving credit agreement, which was used to fund the acquisition of Vionic in October 2018. Net interest expense in 2018 was $18.3 million, compared to $17.3 million in 2017 and $13.7 million in 2016. The increase in net interest expense in 2018 was attributable to higher average borrowings under our
revolving credit agreement due to $360 million in borrowings used to fund the acquisition of Vionic. The increase in net interest expense in 2017 was attributable to higher average borrowings under our revolving credit agreement due to the acquisition of Allen Edmonds in December 2016. The balance on the revolving credit agreement at the end of 2016 was paid down throughout 2017.
Credit Agreement
The Company maintains a revolving credit facility for working capital needs. On December 18, 2014, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries
(the “Loan Parties”) entered into the Former Credit Agreement, which was further amended on July 20, 2015 to release all of the Company’s subsidiaries that were borrowers under or that guaranteed the Former Credit Agreement other than Sidney Rich Associates, Inc. and BG Retail, LLC. Allen Edmonds and Vionic were joined to the Agreement as guarantors on December 13, 2016 and October 31, 2018, respectively. After giving effect to the joinders, the Company is the lead borrower, and Sidney Rich Associates, Inc., BG Retail, LLC, Allen Edmonds and Vionic are each co-borrowers
and guarantors under the Former Credit Agreement. On January 18, 2019, the Loan Parties entered into a Third Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (as so amended, the "Credit Agreement") to extend the maturity date to January 18, 2024 and change the borrowing capacity under the Former Credit Agreement from an aggregate amount of up to $600.0 million to an aggregate amount of up to $500.0 million, with the option to increase by up to $250.0 million. The Credit Agreement also reduces upfront and unused borrowing fees, provides for less restrictive covenants and offers more flexibility.
Borrowing availability under the Credit Agreement is limited to the lesser of the total commitments and the borrowing base ("Loan Cap"), which is based on stated
percentages of the sum of eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory and eligible credit card receivables, as defined, less applicable reserves. Under the Credit Agreement, the Loan Parties’ obligations are secured by a first-priority security interest in all accounts receivable, inventory and certain other collateral.
Interest on borrowings is at variable rates based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or the prime rate, as defined in the Credit Agreement, plus a spread. The interest rate and fees for letters of credit vary based upon the level of excess availability under the Credit Agreement. There is an unused line fee payable on the unused portion under the facility and a letter of credit fee payable on the outstanding face amount under letters of credit.
33
We
were in compliance with all covenants and restrictions under the Credit Agreement as of February 2, 2019. Refer to further discussion regarding the Credit Agreement in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
At February 2, 2019, we had $335.0 million borrowings and $10.5 million in letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Agreement. Total borrowing availability was $154.5 million at February 2, 2019.
$200
Million Senior Notes
On July 27, 2015, we issued $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes due in 2023 (the "Senior Notes"). The Senior Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of the subsidiaries of Caleres, Inc. that is an obligor under the Credit Agreement, and bear interest at 6.25%, which is payable on February 15 and August 15 of each year. The Senior Notes mature on August 15, 2023. We may redeem some or all of the Senior Notes at various redemption prices.
The Senior Notes also contain covenants and restrictions that limit certain activities including, among other things, levels of indebtedness,
payments of dividends, the guarantee or pledge of assets, certain investments, common stock repurchases, mergers and acquisitions and sales of assets. As of February 2, 2019, we were in compliance with all covenants and restrictions relating to the Senior Notes.
Working
capital has been computed as total current assets less total current liabilities.
(2)
The current ratio has been computed by dividing total current assets by total current liabilities.
(3)
Debt-to-capital has been computed by dividing total debt by total capitalization. Total debt is defined as long-term debt and borrowings under the Credit Agreement. Total capitalization is defined as total debt and total equity.
Working
capital at February 2, 2019, was $123.1 million, which was $293.5 million lower than at February 3, 2018. Our current ratio was 1.14 to 1 at February 2, 2019, compared to 1.97 to 1 at February 3, 2018. The decrease in working capital and the current ratio reflects the impact of the Vionic acquisition in 2018, which was funded with borrowings under our revolving credit agreement. A significant portion of the purchase price of Vionic was allocated to noncurrent assets, such as goodwill and other intangible
assets that are excluded from working capital, while the entire purchase price was funded using current liabilities. We plan to pay down the remaining borrowings under our revolving credit agreement over the next two years. Our debt-to-capital ratio was 45.6% as of February 2, 2019, compared to 21.5% at February 3, 2018, primarily reflecting the higher borrowings under our revolving credit agreement described above.
2018
2017
(Decrease)
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
129.6
$
191.4
$
(61.8
)
Net
cash used for investing activities
(436.4
)
(51.2
)
(385.2
)
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities
273.2
(131.8
)
405.0
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(0.2
)
0.3
(0.5
)
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
$
(33.8
)
$
8.7
$
(42.5
)
At
February 2, 2019, we had $30.2 million of cash and cash equivalents, approximately half of which represents the accumulated unremitted earnings of our foreign subsidiaries.
Cash provided by operating activities was $61.8 million lower in 2018 than last year, reflecting the following factors:
•
An increase
in our inventories due to earlier receipt of spring product from our Brand Portfolio factory partners, due to an earlier holiday shutdown period for Chinese New Year, compared to a decrease in inventory in 2017 and
•
A decrease in net income taxes due in part to the impact of tax reform, partially offset by
•
A larger increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities compared to 2017 and
•
A
larger increase in trade accounts payable reflecting the higher level of inventory.
34
Cash used for investing activities was $385.2 million higher in 2018 than last year, primarily reflecting the acquisition costs of Blowfish Malibu in July 2018 and Vionic in October 2018, as further discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. In addition, we had higher purchases of property and equipment in 2018 as a result of our investments in our new leased Brand Portfolio warehouses in California. In 2019, we expect purchases of property and equipment and capitalized
software of approximately $60 million.
Cash provided by financing activities was $405.0 million higher in 2018 than last year, primarily due to the $360.0 million of borrowings under our revolving credit agreement for the acquisition of Vionic, of which $25.0 million was repaid during 2018, partially offset by higher repurchases of shares under our stock repurchase programs during 2018. During 2017, we had net repayments on our revolving credit agreement for the December 2016 Allen Edmonds acquisition.
We paid dividends of $0.28 per share in each of 2018, 2017
and 2016. The 2018 dividends marked the 96th year of consecutive quarterly dividends. On March 14, 2019, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share, payable April 9, 2019, to shareholders of record on March 26, 2019, marking the 384th consecutive quarterly dividend to be paid by the Company. The declaration and payment of any future dividend is at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on our results of operations, financial condition, business conditions and other
factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors. However, we presently expect that dividends will continue to be paid.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Certain accounting issues require management estimates and judgments for the preparation of financial statements. Our most significant policies requiring the use of estimates and judgments are listed below.
Inventories
Inventories
are our most significant asset, representing approximately 37% of total assets at the end of 2018. We value inventories at the lower of cost and net realizable value with 88% of consolidated inventories using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs and are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation.
We apply judgment in valuing our inventories by assessing the net realizable value of our inventories based on current selling prices. At our Famous Footwear
segment and certain retail operations within our Brand Portfolio segment, we recognize markdowns when it becomes evident that inventory items will be sold at retail prices less than cost, plus the cost to sell the product. This policy causes the gross profit rates at our Famous Footwear segment and, to a lesser extent, our Brand Portfolio segment to be lower than the initial markup during periods when permanent price reductions are taken to clear product. Within our Brand Portfolio segment, we generally provide markdown reserves to reduce the carrying values of inventories to a level where, upon sale of the product, we will realize our normal gross profit rate. We believe these policies reflect the difference in operating models between our Famous Footwear segment and our Brand Portfolio segment. Famous Footwear periodically runs promotional events to drive sales to clear seasonal inventories. The Brand Portfolio segment generally relies on permanent price reductions
to clear slower-moving inventory.
We perform physical inventory counts or cycle counts on all merchandise inventory on hand throughout the year and adjust the recorded balance to reflect the results. We record estimated shrinkage between physical inventory counts based on historical results. Inventory shrinkage is included as a component of cost of goods sold.
Income Taxes
We record deferred taxes for the effects of timing differences between financial and tax reporting. These differences relate principally to employee benefit plans, accrued expenses, bad debt reserves, goodwill and intangible assets, depreciation and amortization and inventory.
On
December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("the Act") was signed into law, making significant changes to the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. In response to the Act, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118") to address the application of GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Act. We have accounted for the Act in accordance with the provisions of SAB 118. The Act includes the Global Intangibles Low-taxed Income ("GILTI") provision, a new minimum tax on global intangible low-taxed income, the Base Erosion Anti-Avoidance ("BEAT"), a new tax for certain payments to foreign related parties and the Foreign-Derived Intangible Income ("FDII") provision,
a tax incentive to earn income from the sale, lease or license of goods and services abroad. The Company has elected to account for the GILTI provision as a period cost in the year the taxes are incurred
35
and therefore, deferred tax assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries have not been adjusted for these provisions. Refer to Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the impact of the Act and SAB 118.
We evaluate our foreign investment opportunities and plans,
as well as our foreign working capital needs, to determine the level of investment required and, accordingly, determine the level of foreign earnings that we consider indefinitely reinvested. Based upon that evaluation, earnings of our foreign subsidiaries that are not otherwise subject to United States taxation are considered to be indefinitely reinvested, and accordingly, deferred taxes have not been provided beyond the amounts recorded for the one-time transition tax for the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings, as required by the Act. If changes occur in future investment opportunities and plans, those changes will be reflected when known and may result in providing residual United States deferred taxes on unremitted foreign earnings.
As of February 2,
2019, we have net operating losses and other carryforwards at certain of our subsidiaries. We evaluate these carryforwards for realization based upon their expiration dates and our expectations of future taxable income. As deemed appropriate, valuation reserves are recorded to adjust the recorded value of these carryforwards to the expected realizable value.
We are audited periodically by domestic and foreign tax authorities and tax assessments may arise several years after tax returns have been filed. Tax liabilities are recorded when, in management’s judgment, a tax position does not meet the more-likely-than-not threshold for recognition. For tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not threshold, a tax liability may be recorded depending on management’s
assessment of how the tax position will ultimately be settled. In evaluating issues raised in such audits and other uncertain tax positions, we provide reserves for exposures as appropriate.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are not amortized but are subject to annual impairment tests. In accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, a company is permitted, but not required, to qualitatively assess indicators of a reporting unit’s fair value when it is unlikely that a reporting unit is impaired. If, after completing the qualitative assessment, a company believes it is likely that a reporting unit is impaired, a discounted cash flow analysis is prepared to estimate fair value. If the recorded values of these assets
are not recoverable, based on either the assessment screen or discounted cash flow analysis, goodwill impairment is recognized for the amount by which a reporting unit's carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying value of goodwill. We perform impairment tests during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year unless events or circumstances indicate an interim test is required. Other intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives and are reviewed for impairment if and when impairment indicators are present.
We elected to perform the optional qualitative assessment in 2018 for all reporting units except our Allen Edmonds reporting unit. The Company performed a quantitative assessment for the Allen Edmonds reporting unit. The quantitative test is a fair value-based test
applied at the reporting unit level, which is generally at or one level below the operating segment level. The test compared the fair value of our Allen Edmonds reporting unit to the carrying value of that reporting unit. This test requires significant assumptions, estimates and judgments by management, and is subject to inherent uncertainties and subjectivity. The fair value of the reporting unit is determined using an estimate of future cash flows of the reporting unit and a risk-adjusted discount rate to compute a net present value of future cash flows. Projected net sales, gross profit, selling and administrative expenses, capital expenditures, depreciation, amortization and working capital requirements are based on the past performance of the reporting units as well as our internal projections. Discount rates reflect market-based estimates of the risks associated with the projected cash flows of the reporting unit directly resulting from the use of its assets
in its operations. We also considered assumptions that market participants may use. The estimate of the fair value of our Allen Edmonds reporting unit was based on the best information available to us as of the date of the assessment. In our quantitative assessment of goodwill, our net sales and earnings projections, growth rates and discount rates require significant management judgment and are the assumptions to which the fair value calculation is the most sensitive. Changes in any of these assumptions, including the impact of external factors such as interest rates, could result in the calculated fair value falling below the carrying value in future assessments. During 2018, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $38.0 million for the impairment of goodwill of our Allen Edmonds reporting unit. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
We
tested our indefinite-lived intangible assets utilizing the relief-from-royalty method to determine the estimated fair value of each indefinite-lived intangible asset. The relief-from-royalty method estimates the theoretical royalty savings from ownership of the intangible asset. Key assumptions used in our assessments include net sales projections, discount rates and royalty rates. Royalty rates are established by management based on comparable trademark licensing agreements in the market. The net sales projections, discount rates and royalty rates utilized in our quantitative assessments of indefinite-lived intangible assets require significant management judgment and are the assumptions to which the fair value calculation is most sensitive. Changes in any of these assumptions could negatively impact the fair value calculation, potentially resulting in an impairment charge in future assessments. During 2018, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $60.0
million for the impairment of the Allen Edmonds indefinite-lived tradename. The impairment charge was primarily driven by the decision to change the brand's pricing structure to be less promotional in the future, which resulted in a decline in projected
36
revenue, as well as rising interest rates. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion. In addition, as a result of impairment indicators for the Allen Edmonds business, we tested for impairment the definite-lived customer relationship intangible asset associated with the Allen Edmonds business as of the first day of our fourth fiscal quarter. The fair value of the customer relationship intangible asset was determined using the excess earnings method. The fair
value exceeded the carrying value and therefore, no impairment charge was recorded.
The goodwill impairment testing and other indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment reviews were performed as of the first day of our fourth fiscal quarter and, other than the Allen Edmonds tradename and goodwill impairment described above, there were no impairment charges. The fair values of our other reporting units and indefinite-lived intangible assets were substantially in excess of the carrying values as of our most recent impairment testing date, except for the reporting units associated with Blowfish Malibu and Vionic, which were acquired in July 2018 and October 2018, respectively. The relationship between the fair value and carrying value of a reporting unit is influenced by many factors, including the length of time that has passed since the reporting unit was initially acquired. Upon
acquisition, the carrying value of the reporting unit typically approximates its fair value. Therefore, the fair value of a recently acquired reporting unit typically approximates its carrying value. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to goodwill and intangible assets.
Business Combination Accounting
We allocate the purchase price of an acquired entity to the assets and liabilities acquired based upon their estimated fair values at the business combination date. We also identify and estimate the fair values of intangible assets that should be recognized as assets apart from goodwill. A single estimate of fair value results from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and relies heavily on estimates and assumptions. We have historically relied
in part upon the use of reports from third-party valuation specialists to assist in the estimation of fair values for intangible assets other than goodwill, inventory and fixed assets. The carrying values of acquired receivables and trade accounts payable have historically approximated their fair values at the business combination date. With respect to other acquired assets and liabilities, we use all available information to make our best estimates of their fair values at the business combination date.
Our purchase price allocation methodology contains uncertainties because it requires management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities. Management estimates the fair value of assets and liabilities based upon quoted market prices, the carrying value of the acquired assets and widely accepted valuation techniques,
including discounted cash flows. Unanticipated events or circumstances may occur which could affect the accuracy of our fair value estimates, including assumptions regarding industry economic factors and business strategies.
During 2018, we acquired two businesses, Blowfish Malibu and Vionic. Refer to further discussion in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
Impact of Prospective Accounting Pronouncements
Recent accounting pronouncements and their impact on the Company are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
The
table below sets forth our significant future obligations by time period. Further information on certain of these commitments is provided in the notes to our consolidated financial statements, which are cross-referenced in this table. Our obligations outstanding as of February 2, 2019 include the following:
Payments
Due by Period
Less Than
1-3
3-5
More Than
($ millions)
Total
1
Year
Years
Years
5 Years
Borrowings under Credit Agreement
$
335.0
$
335.0
$
—
$
—
$
—
Long-term
debt (1)
200.0
—
—
—
200.0
Interest on long-term debt (1)
62.5
12.5
25.0
25.0
—
Financial
instruments (2)
0.6
0.6
—
—
—
Operating lease commitments (3)
850.0
173.9
276.8
186.5
212.8
Capital
lease obligation
3.3
1.4
1.9
—
—
Minimum license commitments
21.0
9.1
11.9
—
—
Purchase
obligations (4)
650.9
623.7
18.3
3.9
5.0
Mandatory purchase obligation (5)
9.2
—
9.2
—
—
Other
(6)
18.5
1.9
3.2
6.2
7.2
Total (7)
$
2,151.0
$
1,158.1
$
346.3
$
221.6
$
425.0
(1)
Interest
on borrowings is at variable rates based on LIBOR or the prime rate, as defined in the Credit Agreement, plus a spread. The interest rate and fees for letters of credit varies based upon the level of excess availability under the Credit Agreement. There is an unused line fee payable on the excess availability under the facility and a letter of credit fee payable on the outstanding exposure under letters of credit. Interest obligations, which are variable in nature, are not included in the table above. Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
(1)
Interest obligations have been reflected based on our $200.0 million principal value of Senior Notes at a fixed interest rate of 6.25% as of fiscal year ended February 3, 2019. Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial
statements.
(2)
Financial instruments reflect the net fair value of our foreign exchange forwards contracts. Refer to Note 14 and Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.
(3)
The majority of our retail operating leases contain provisions that allow us to modify amounts payable under the lease or terminate the lease in certain circumstances, such as experiencing actual sales volume below a defined threshold and/or co-tenancy provisions associated with the facility. The contractual obligations presented in the table above reflect the minimum rent obligations, irrespective of our ability to reduce or terminate
rental payments in the future, as noted. Refer to Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
(4)
Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase assets, goods or services that specify all significant terms, including quantity and price provisions.
(5)
Refer to Note 2 and Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion regarding the mandatory purchase obligation associated with the Blowfish Malibu acquisition.
(6)
Includes obligations for our supplemental executive retirement plan and other postretirement benefits, as discussed in Note
6 to the consolidated financial statements, one-time transition tax for the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings, as discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, and other contractual obligations.
(7)
Excludes liabilities of $7.3 million, $2.4 million and $4.4 million for our non-qualified deferred compensation plan, deferred compensation plan for non-employee directors and restricted stock units for non-employee directors, respectively, due to the uncertain nature in timing of payments. Refer to Note 6, Note 15 and Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements.
SAFE
HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 AND FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from those projected as they are subject to various risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, the risks detailed in Item 1A, Risk Factors, and those described in other documents and reports filed from time to time with the SEC, press releases and other communications. We do not undertake any obligation or plan to update these forward-looking
statements, even though our situation may change.
38
ITEM 7A
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
FOREIGN
CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATES
The market risk inherent in our financial instruments and positions represents the potential loss arising from adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. To address these risks, we enter into various hedging transactions. All decisions on hedging transactions are authorized and executed pursuant to our policies and procedures, which do not allow the use of financial instruments for trading purposes. We also are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these financial instruments. Counterparties to these agreements, however, are major international financial institutions, and we believe the risk of loss due to nonperformance is minimal.
A description of our accounting policies for derivative financial instruments
is included in Notes 1 and 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
In addition, we are exposed to translation risk because certain of our foreign operations use the local currency as their functional currency and those financial results must be translated into United States dollars. As currency exchange rates fluctuate, translation of our financial statements of foreign businesses into United States dollars affects the comparability of financial results between years.
INTEREST RATES
Our financing
arrangements include outstanding variable rate debt under the Credit Agreement and $200.0 million in principal value of 2023 Senior Notes, which bear interest at a fixed rate of 6.25%. Changes in interest rates impact fixed and variable rate debt differently. For fixed-rate debt, a change in interest rates will only impact the fair value of the debt, whereas a change in the interest rates on variable- rate debt will impact interest expense and cash flows.
At February 2, 2019, the fair value of our long-term debt is estimated at approximately $205.5 million based upon the pricing of our 2023 Senior Notes at that time. Market risk is viewed as the
potential change in fair value of our debt resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in interest rates and would be $4.4 million for our long-term debt at February 2, 2019.
Information appearing under the caption Risk Management and Derivatives in Note 14 and Fair Value Measurements in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM
8
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework). Management's assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of Blowfish Malibu, which was acquired in July 2018, or Vionic, which was acquired in October 2018, as further discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. Both Blowfish Malibu and Vionic are included in the Company's 2018 consolidated financial statements. Blowfish Malibu and Vionic constituted 2.0% and 21.3% of total assets, respectively, as of February 2, 2019; and 0.5% and 1.6% of net sales, respectively, and 0.5% and 0.8% of gross profit, respectively, for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2019. Based on our evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer have concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of February 2, 2019. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2019 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report which is included herein.
39
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Caleres, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Caleres, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Caleres, Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2019, based on the COSO criteria.
As
indicated in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of Blowfish Malibu or Vionic, which are included in the 2018 consolidated financial statements of the Company and constituted 2.0% and 21.3% of total assets, respectively, as of February 2, 2019; 0.5% and 1.6% of net sales, respectively; and 0.5% and 0.8% of gross profit, respectively, for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Blowfish Malibu or Vionic.
We
also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of Caleres, Inc. as of February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, the related consolidated statements of earnings (loss), comprehensive income (loss), cash flows and shareholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended February 2, 2019, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a), and our report dated April 2, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management
is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Caleres, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Caleres, Inc. (the Company) as of February 2, 2019 and February 3,
2018, the related consolidated statements of earnings (loss), comprehensive income (loss), cash flows and shareholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended February 2, 2019, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 2, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) and our report dated April 2, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis
for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Receivables, net of allowances of $28,998 in 2018 and $27,098 in 2017
191,722
152,613
Inventories,
net of adjustment to last-in, first-out cost of $3,310 in 2018 and $4,038 in 2017
683,171
569,379
Income taxes
4,875
—
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
66,479
60,750
Total current assets
976,447
846,789
Prepaid
pension costs
47,826
62,575
Property and equipment, net
230,784
212,799
Deferred
income taxes
9,833
2,305
Goodwill
242,531
127,081
Intangible
assets, net
307,366
212,087
Other assets
23,781
25,779
Total
assets
$
1,838,568
$
1,489,415
LIABILITIES
AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Borrowings under revolving credit agreement
$
335,000
$
—
Trade
accounts payable
316,298
272,962
Employee compensation and benefits
58,593
45,226
Income
taxes
6,388
8,222
Other accrued expenses
137,057
103,749
Total
current liabilities
853,336
430,159
Other liabilities:
Long-term debt
197,932
197,472
Deferred
rent
54,850
53,071
Income taxes
7,786
11,933
Deferred
income taxes
49,986
50,667
Other liabilities
39,243
27,151
Total
other liabilities
349,797
340,294
Equity:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares outstanding
—
—
Common
stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 41,886,562 and 43,031,689 shares outstanding, net of 4,200,233 and 3,055,106 treasury shares in 2018 and 2017, respectively
419
430
Additional paid-in capital
145,889
136,460
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
(31,601
)
(15,170
)
Retained earnings
519,346
595,769
Total
Caleres, Inc. shareholders’ equity
634,053
717,489
Noncontrolling interests
1,382
1,473
Total
equity
635,435
718,962
Total liabilities and equity
$
1,838,568
$
1,489,415
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
42
Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss)
($
thousands, except per share amounts)
2018
2017
2016
Net sales
$
2,834,846
$
2,785,584
$
2,579,388
Cost
of goods sold
1,678,502
1,616,935
1,517,397
Gross profit
1,156,344
1,168,649
1,061,991
Selling
and administrative expenses
1,041,765
1,036,051
942,595
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets
98,044
—
—
Restructuring
and other special charges, net
16,134
4,915
23,404
Operating earnings
401
127,683
95,992
Interest
expense, net
(18,277
)
(17,325
)
(13,731
)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
(186
)
—
—
Other
income, net
12,308
12,348
14,993
(Loss) earnings before income taxes
(5,754
)
122,706
97,254
Income
tax benefit (provision)
273
(35,475
)
(31,168
)
Net (loss) earnings
(5,481
)
87,231
66,086
Net
(loss) earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
(40
)
31
428
Net (loss) earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc.
(5,441
)
87,200
65,658
Basic
(loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
$
(0.13
)
$
2.03
$
1.52
Diluted
(loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
$
(0.13
)
$
2.02
$
1.52
See notes to consolidated
financial statements.
43
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
($
thousands)
2018
2017
2016
Net (loss) earnings
$
(5,481
)
$
87,231
$
66,086
Other
comprehensive (loss) income ("OCI"), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustment
(1,224
)
1,116
1,045
Pension
and other postretirement benefits adjustments
(13,883
)
18,794
(24,728
)
Derivative financial instruments
(1,375
)
1,101
(934
)
Other
comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
(16,482
)
21,011
(24,617
)
Comprehensive (loss) income
(21,963
)
108,242
41,469
Comprehensive
(loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interests
(91
)
104
381
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Caleres, Inc.
$
(21,872
)
$
108,138
$
41,088
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
44
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
($
thousands)
2018
2017
2016
Operating Activities
Net
(loss) earnings
$
(5,481
)
$
87,231
$
66,086
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation
45,540
45,799
39,419
Amortization of capitalized software
10,136
14,198
13,007
Amortization
of intangibles
7,021
4,073
3,705
Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount
2,210
1,761
1,726
Loss
on early extinguishment of debt
186
—
—
Share-based compensation expense
13,805
11,298
7,725
Excess
tax benefit related to share-based plans
—
—
(2,251
)
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
2,396
1,288
1,065
Impairment
charges for property and equipment
3,665
3,775
1,586
Impairment of note receivable
—
—
7,281
Impairment
of investment in nonconsolidated affiliate
—
—
7,000
Impairment of intangible assets
98,044
—
—
Deferred
rent
1,779
1,947
4,618
Deferred income taxes
(6,922
)
(1,424
)
(5,303
)
Provision
for doubtful accounts
518
1,336
1,384
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquired amounts:
Receivables
(2,635
)
(828
)
5,433
Inventories
(51,676
)
18,099
13,835
Prepaid
expenses and other current and noncurrent assets
(6,064
)
(32,096
)
14,226
Trade accounts payable
17,236
6,160
16,074
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
19,350
2,247
(15,051
)
Income taxes, net
(17,736
)
26,208
1,329
Other,
net
(1,783
)
303
728
Net cash provided by operating activities
129,589
191,375
183,622
Investing
Activities
Purchases of property and equipment
(62,483
)
(44,720
)
(50,523
)
Capitalized
software
(4,416
)
(6,458
)
(9,039
)
Acquisition of Allen Edmonds, net of cash received
—
—
(259,932
)
Acquisition
of Blowfish Malibu, net of cash received
(16,792
)
—
—
Acquisition of Vionic, net of cash received
(352,666
)
—
—
Net
cash used for investing activities
(436,357
)
(51,178
)
(319,494
)
Financing
Activities
Borrowings under revolving credit agreement
360,000
454,000
623,000
Repayments
under revolving credit agreement
(25,000
)
(564,000
)
(513,000
)
Repayments of capital lease obligations
(406
)
—
—
Dividends
paid
(11,983
)
(12,027
)
(12,104
)
Debt issuance costs
(1,298
)
—
—
Acquisition
of treasury stock
(43,771
)
(5,993
)
(23,139
)
Issuance of common stock under share-based plans, net
(4,372
)
(3,816
)
(4,188
)
Excess
tax benefit related to share-based plans
—
—
2,251
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities
273,170
(131,836
)
72,820
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(249
)
354
233
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(33,847
)
8,715
(62,819
)
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
64,047
55,332
118,151
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
$
30,200
$
64,047
$
55,332
See
notes to consolidated financial statements, including the supplemental disclosures on cash flows in Note 1.
45
Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
Common Stock
Additional Paid-In Capital
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Retained Earnings
Total Caleres, Inc. Shareholders’ Equity
Non-controlling Interests
($ thousands, except number of shares and per share amounts)
Caleres,
Inc., originally founded as Brown Shoe Company in 1878 and incorporated in 1913, is a global footwear company. The Company’s shares are traded under the “CAL” symbol on the New York Stock Exchange.
The Company provides a broad offering of licensed, branded and private-label casual, dress and athletic footwear products to women, men and children. The footwear is sold at a variety of price points through multiple distribution channels both domestically and internationally. The Company currently operates 1,221 retail shoe stores in the United States, Canada, Guam and Italy, primarily
under the Famous Footwear, Naturalizer and Allen Edmonds names. In addition, through its Brand Portfolio segment, the Company designs, sources and markets footwear to retail stores domestically and internationally, including national chains, online retailers, department stores, mass merchandisers, independent retailers and catalogs. In 2018, approximately 65% of the Company’s net sales were at retail, compared to 69% in 2017 and 67% in 2016. Refer to Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding
the Company’s business segments.
The Company’s business is seasonal in nature due to consumer spending patterns with higher back-to-school and holiday season sales. Traditionally, the third fiscal quarter accounts for a substantial portion of the Company’s earnings for the year.
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries,
after the elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions.
Noncontrolling Interests
Noncontrolling interests in the Company’s consolidated financial statements result from the accounting for noncontrolling interests in partially-owned consolidated subsidiaries or affiliates. The Company has a joint venture agreement with a subsidiary of C. banner International Holdings Limited (“CBI”) to market Naturalizer footwear in China. The Company is a 51%
owner of the joint venture (“B&H Footwear”), with CBI owning the other 49%. The license enabling the joint venture to market the footwear expired in August 2017 and the parties are in the process of dissolving their joint venture arrangements. The Company consolidates B&H Footwear Company Limited into its consolidated financial statements. Net (loss) earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests represents the share of net earnings that are attributable to the B&H Footwear equity. Transactions between the Company and B&H Footwear have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Period
The
Company’s fiscal year is the 52- or 53-week period ending the Saturday nearest to January 31. Fiscal years 2018 and 2016, which included 52 weeks, ended on February 2, 2019 and January 28, 2017, respectively. Fiscal year 2017, which included 53 weeks, ended on February 3, 2018.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Receivables
The Company evaluates the collectibility of selected accounts receivable on a case-by-case basis and makes adjustments to the bad debt reserve for expected losses. The
Company considers factors such as ability to pay, bankruptcy, credit ratings and payment history. For all other accounts, the Company estimates reserves for bad debts based on experience and past due status of the accounts. If circumstances related to customers change, estimates of recoverability are further adjusted. The Company recognized a provision for doubtful accounts of $0.5 million in 2018, $1.3 million in 2017 and $1.4 million in 2016.
47
Customer
allowances represent reserves against our wholesale customers’ accounts receivable for margin assistance, product returns, customer deductions and co-op advertising allowances. The Company estimates the reserves needed for margin assistance by reviewing inventory levels on the retail floors, sell-through rates, historical dilution, current gross margin levels and other performance indicators of our major retail customers. Product returns and customer deductions are estimated using historical experience and anticipated future trends. Co-op advertising allowances are estimated based on customer agreements. The Company recognized a provision for customer allowances of $54.2 million in 2018, $51.1
million in 2017 and $45.2 million in 2016.
Customer discounts represent reserves against our accounts receivable for discounts that our wholesale customers may take based on meeting certain order, payment or return guidelines. The Company estimates the reserves needed for customer discounts based upon customer net sales and respective agreement terms. The Company recognized a provision for customer discounts of $5.5 million in 2018, $4.8 million
in 2017 and $3.6 million in 2016.
Inventories
All inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value with approximately 88% of consolidated inventories using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs and are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation. If the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method had been used, consolidated inventories would
have been $3.3 million and $4.0 million higher at February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, respectively. Refer to Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
The costs of inventory, inbound freight and duties, markdowns, shrinkage and royalty expense are classified in cost of goods sold. Costs of warehousing and distribution are classified in selling and administrative expenses and are expensed as incurred. Such warehousing and distribution costs totaled $106.9 million, $89.7 million
and $77.7 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Costs of overseas sourcing offices and other inventory procurement costs are reflected in selling and administrative expenses and are expensed as incurred. Such sourcing and procurement costs totaled $22.1 million, $23.1 million and $21.5 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The Company
applies judgment in valuing inventories by assessing the net realizable value of inventories based on current selling prices. At the Famous Footwear segment and certain Brand Portfolio operations, markdowns are recognized when it becomes evident that inventory items will be sold at retail prices less than cost, plus the cost to sell the product. This policy causes the gross profit rates at Famous Footwear and, to a lesser extent, Brand Portfolio to be lower than the initial markup during periods when permanent price reductions are taken to clear product. Within certain other Brand Portfolio operations, markdown reserves reduce the carrying values of inventories to a level where, upon sale of the product, the Company will realize its normal gross profit rate. The Company believes these policies reflect
the difference in operating models between the Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio segments. Famous Footwear periodically runs promotional events to drive sales to clear seasonal inventories. The Brand Portfolio segment relies on permanent price reductions to clear slower-moving inventory.
Markdowns are recorded to reflect expected adjustments to sales prices. In determining markdowns, management considers current and recently recorded sales prices, the length of time the product is held in inventory and quantities of various product styles contained in inventory, among other factors. The ultimate amount realized from the sale of certain products could differ from management estimates. The Company performs physical inventory counts or cycle counts on all merchandise inventory on hand throughout
the year and adjusts the recorded balance to reflect the results. The Company records estimated shrinkage between physical inventory counts based on historical results.
Computer Software Costs
The Company capitalizes certain costs in other assets, including internal payroll costs incurred in connection with the development or acquisition of software for internal use. Other assets on the consolidated balance sheets include $16.4 million and $22.3 million of computer software costs as of February 2, 2019
and February 3, 2018, respectively, which are net of accumulated amortization of $131.8 million and $123.0 million as of the end of the respective periods. In addition, as further discussed below, the Company adopted ASU 2018-15 on a prospective basis in the third quarter of 2018 and capitalized $0.5 million of implementation costs for hosting arrangements in 2018.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is provided over the estimated useful lives of the
assets or the remaining lease terms, where applicable, using the straight-line method.
48
Interest Expense
Capitalized Interest
Interest costs for major asset additions are capitalized during the construction or development period and amortized over the lives of the related assets. The Company capitalized interest of $0.2 million in 2018, related to the new company-operated Brand Portfolio warehouse facilities in California, with no corresponding interest capitalized in
2017. The Company capitalized interest of $1.4 million in 2016 related to its expansion and modernization project at its Lebanon, Tennessee distribution center.
Interest Expense
Interest expense includes interest for borrowings under both the Company’s short-term and long-term debt, net of amounts capitalized. Interest expense includes fees paid under the short-term revolving credit agreement for the unused portion of its line of credit. Interest expense also includes the amortization of deferred debt issuance costs and debt discount as well as the accretion of certain discounted noncurrent liabilities, including the mandatory
purchase obligation from the acquisition of Blowfish Malibu, as further described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are not amortized but are subject to annual impairment tests. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (ASC Topic 350) Testing Goodwill for Impairment, the Company is permitted, but not required, to qualitatively assess indicators of a reporting unit’s fair value when it is unlikely that a reporting unit is impaired. If, after completing the qualitative assessment, management believes it is likely that a reporting unit is
impaired, a discounted cash flow analysis is prepared to estimate fair value. A fair value-based test is applied at the reporting unit level, which is generally at or one level below the operating segment level. The test compares the fair value of the Company’s reporting units to the carrying value of those reporting units. This test requires significant assumptions, estimates and judgments by management, and is subject to inherent uncertainties and subjectivity. The fair value of the reporting unit is determined using both a market approach and discounted cash flow analysis. The market approach method includes the use of multiples of comparable publicly-traded companies. The discounted cash flow approach estimates the fair value of the reporting unit using projected cash flows of the reporting unit and a risk-adjusted discount rate to compute a net present value of future cash
flows. Projected net sales, gross profit, selling and administrative expense, capital expenditures and working capital requirements are based on the Company's internal projections. Discount rates reflect market-based estimates of the risks associated with the projected cash flows of the reporting units directly resulting from the use of its assets in its operations. Assumptions that market participants may use are also considered. The estimate of the fair values of the Company's reporting units is based on the best information available to the Company's management as of the date of the assessment. During the third quarter of 2017, the Company
adopted ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill. Goodwill impairment is recorded if the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, not to exceed the carrying value of goodwill.
The Company performs its goodwill impairment assessment as of the first day of the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. The Company elected to perform the optional qualitative assessment for all reporting units except the Allen Edmonds reporting unit. A quantitative assessment was performed for the Allen Edmonds reporting unit. Based on the
results of the goodwill impairment quantitative assessment, the Company determined that the carrying value of the Allen Edmonds reporting unit exceeded its fair value and during the fourth quarter of 2018, a non-cash impairment charge of $38.0 million was recorded for the impairment of goodwill of the Allen Edmonds reporting unit. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
The Company performs impairment tests on its indefinite-lived intangible assets as of the first day of the fourth quarter of each fiscal year unless events indicate an interim test is required. During 2018, a non-cash impairment charge of $60.0
million was recorded for the impairment of the Allen Edmonds indefinite-lived tradename. The impairment charge was primarily driven by a decline in projected revenues as a result of the Company's decision to change the brand's pricing structure to be less promotional in the future, as well as rising interest rates. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion. Definite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill, are amortized over their useful lives and are reviewed for impairment if and when impairment indicators are present.
Investment in Nonconsolidated Affiliate
The Company has an investment in a nonconsolidated
affiliate that is accounted for using the cost method. During 2016, the Company determined that the investment had an other-than-temporary decline in its fair value that exceeded its $7.0 million carrying value and recorded an impairment charge of $7.0 million, which is presented in restructuring and other special charges, net in the consolidated statements of earnings in 2016.
49
Self-Insurance Reserves
The Company is self-insured
and/or retains high deductibles for a significant portion of its workers’ compensation, health, disability, cyber risk, general liability, automobile and property programs, among others. Liabilities associated with the risks that are retained by the Company are estimated by considering historical claims experience, trends of the Company and the industry and other actuarial assumptions. The estimated accruals for these liabilities could be affected if development of costs on claims differ from these assumptions and historical trends. Based on available information as of February 2, 2019, the Company believes it has provided adequate
reserves for its self-insurance exposure. As of February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, self-insurance reserves were $11.6 million and $11.0 million, respectively.
Revenue Recognition
Retail sales, recognized at the point of sale, are recorded net of returns and exclude sales tax. Wholesale sales are recorded, net of returns, allowances and discounts, when obligations under the terms of a contract with the consumer are satisfied. This generally occurs at the time
of transfer of control of merchandise. The Company considers several control indicators in its assessment of the timing of the transfer of control, including significant risks and rewards of ownership, physical possession and the Company's right to receive payment. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for transferring merchandise. Reserves for projected merchandise returns, discounts and allowances are determined based on historical experience and current expectations. Revenue is recognized on license fees related to Company-owned brand-names, where the Company is the licensor, when
the related sales of the licensee are made. The Company applies the guidance using the portfolio approach in ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, because this methodology would not differ materially from applying the guidance to the individual contracts within the portfolio. The Company excludes sales and similar taxes collected from customers from the measurement of the transaction price for its retail sales.
Gift Cards
The
Company sells gift cards to its consumers in its retail stores, through its Internet sites and at other retailers. The Company’s gift cards do not have expiration dates or inactivity fees. The Company recognizes revenue from gift cards when (i) the gift card is redeemed by the consumer or (ii) the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed by the consumer is remote (“gift card breakage”) and the Company determines that it does not have a legal obligation to remit the value of unredeemed gift cards to the relevant jurisdictions. The Company determines its gift card breakage rate based upon historical redemption patterns. The
Company recognizes gift card breakage during the 24-month period following the sale of the gift card, according to the Company’s historical redemption pattern. Gift card breakage income is included in net sales in the consolidated statements of earnings and the liability established upon the sale of a gift card is included in other accrued expenses within the consolidated balance sheets. The Company recognized $0.9 million of gift card breakage in 2018 and $1.7 million in 2017 and $0.7 million in 2016.
Loyalty
Program
The Company maintains a loyalty program (“Rewards”) at Famous Footwear, through which consumers earn points toward savings certificates for qualifying purchases. Upon reaching specified point values, consumers are issued a savings certificate that may be redeemed for purchases at Famous Footwear. Savings certificates earned must be redeemed within stated expiration dates. In addition to the savings certificates, the Company also offers exclusive member discounts. The value of points and rewards earned by Famous Footwear’s Rewards program members are recorded as a reduction of net sales and a liability is established within other accrued expenses at the time the points are earned based on historical conversion and redemption rates. Approximately
76% of net sales in the Famous Footwear segment were made to its Rewards members in both 2018 and 2017. As of February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, the Company had a Rewards program liability of $14.6 million and $8.1 million, respectively, which is included in other accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets. As further discussed below and in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Accounting Standards
Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), during the first quarter of 2018, which had a significant impact on the Company's Rewards program liability.
Store Closing and Impairment Charges
The costs of closing stores, including lease termination costs, property and equipment write-offs and severance, as applicable, are recorded when the store is closed or when a binding agreement is reached with the landlord to close the store.
The
Company regularly analyzes the results of all of its stores and assesses the viability of underperforming stores to determine whether events or circumstances exist that indicate the stores should be closed or whether the carrying amount of their long-lived assets may not be recoverable. After allowing for an appropriate start-up period, unusual nonrecurring events or favorable trends, property and equipment at stores indicated as impaired are written down to fair value as calculated using a discounted cash flow method. The Company recorded asset impairment charges, primarily related to underperforming retail stores, of $3.7 million in 2018, $3.8 million in 2017 and $1.6 million
in 2016.
50
Advertising and Marketing Expense
Advertising and marketing costs are expensed as incurred, except for the costs of direct response advertising that relate primarily to the production and distribution of the Company's catalogs and coupon mailers. Direct response advertising costs are capitalized and amortized over the expected future revenue stream, which is generally one to three months from the date the materials are mailed. External production costs of advertising are expensed when the advertising first appears in the media or in the store.
In
addition, the Company participates in co-op advertising programs with certain of its wholesale customers. For those co-op advertising programs where the Company has validated the fair value of the advertising received, co-op advertising costs are reflected as advertising expense within selling and administrative expenses. Otherwise, co-op advertising costs are reflected as a reduction of net sales.
Total advertising and marketing expense was $84.8 million, $83.6 million and $78.8 million in 2018, 2017
and 2016, respectively. These costs were offset by co-op advertising allowances recovered by the Company’s retail business of $7.6 million, $4.8 million and $4.1 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Total co-op advertising costs reflected as a reduction of net sales were $9.4 million in 2018, $10.0 million in 2017 and $8.4 million in
2016. Total advertising costs attributable to future periods that are deferred and recognized as a component of prepaid expenses and other current assets were $3.7 million and $4.0 million at February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying
amounts and the tax bases of its assets and liabilities. The Company establishes valuation allowances if it believes that it is more-likely-than-not that some or all of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company does not recognize a tax benefit unless it concludes that it is more-likely-than-not that the benefit will be sustained on audit by the taxing authority based solely on the technical merits of the associated tax position. If the recognition threshold is met, the Company recognizes a tax benefit measured at the largest amount of the tax benefit that, in its judgment, is greater than 50% likely to be realized. The
Company records interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax positions within the income tax provision on the consolidated statements of earnings.
As further discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, on December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into law, making significant changes to the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Changes include, but are not limited to, a corporate tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, the transition of U.S. international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a quasi-territorial tax system and a one-time transition
tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings.
Operating Leases
The Company leases its store premises and certain office locations, distribution centers and equipment under operating leases. Approximately one-half of the leases entered into by the Company include options that allow the Company to extend the lease term beyond the initial commitment period, subject to terms agreed to at lease inception. Some leases also include early termination options that can be exercised under specific conditions.
Contingent
Rentals
Many of the leases covering retail stores require contingent rentals in addition to the minimum monthly rental charge based on retail sales volume. The Company records expense for contingent rentals during the period in which the retail sales volume exceeds the respective targets.
Construction Allowances Received From Landlords
At the time its retail facilities are initially leased, the Company often receives consideration from landlords to be applied against the cost of leasehold improvements necessary to open the store. The Company
treats these construction allowances as a lease incentive. The allowances are recorded as a deferred rent obligation and amortized to income over the lease term as a reduction of rent expense. The allowances are reflected as a component of other accrued expenses and deferred rent on the consolidated balance sheets.
Straight-Line Rents and Rent Holidays
The Company records rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term for all of its leased facilities. For leases that have predetermined fixed escalations of the minimum rentals, the Company recognizes the related rental expense on a straight-line basis and records the difference between the recognized rental
expense and amounts payable under the lease as deferred rent. At the time its retail facilities are leased, the Company is frequently not charged rent for a specified period of time, typically 30 to 60 days, while the store is being prepared for opening. This rent-free period is referred to as a rent holiday. The Company recognizes rent expense over the lease term, including any rent holiday, within selling and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of earnings.
51
Pre-opening
Costs
Pre-opening costs associated with opening retail stores, including payroll, supplies and facility costs, are expensed as incurred.
(Loss) Earnings Per Common Share Attributable to Caleres, Inc. Shareholders
The Company uses the two-class method to calculate basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders. Unvested restricted stock awards are considered participating units because they entitle holders to non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents during the vesting term. Under the two-class method, basic (loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders is computed by dividing the net (loss) earnings attributable
to Caleres, Inc. after allocation of earnings to participating securities by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders is computed by dividing the net (loss) earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc. after allocation of earnings to participating securities by the weighted-average number of common shares and potential dilutive securities outstanding during the year. Potential dilutive securities consist of outstanding stock options and contingently issuable shares for the Company's performance share awards. Refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the calculation of (loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders.
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
Comprehensive (loss) income includes the effect of foreign currency translation adjustments, pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments and unrealized gains or losses from derivatives used for hedging activities.
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
For certain of the Company’s international subsidiaries, the local currency is the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars at the period-end exchange rate or historical rates as appropriate. Consolidated
statements of earnings (loss) amounts are translated at average exchange rates for the period. The cumulative translation adjustments resulting from changes in exchange rates are included in the consolidated balance sheets as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in total Caleres, Inc. shareholders’ equity. Transaction gains and losses are included in the consolidated statements of earnings.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Adjustments
The Company determines the expense and obligations for retirement and other benefit plans using assumptions related to discount rates, expected long-term rates of return on invested plan assets, expected salary increases and certain employee-related factors. The
Company determines the fair value of plan assets and benefit obligations as of the January 31 measurement date. The unrecognized portion of the gain or loss on plan assets is included in the consolidated balance sheets as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in total Caleres, Inc. shareholders’ equity and is recognized into the plans’ expense over time. Refer to additional information related to pension and other postretirement benefits in Note 6 and Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and measures those instruments at fair value. The
Company evaluates its exposure to volatility in foreign currency rates and may enter into derivative transactions. These derivative financial instruments are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes. Refer to additional information related to derivative financial instruments in Note 14, Note 15 and Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements.
Litigation Contingencies
The Company is the defendant in several claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes any of these ordinary- course-of-business proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position
or results of operations. The Company accrues its best estimate of the cost of resolution of these claims. Legal defense costs of such claims are recognized in the period in which the costs are incurred. Refer to Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for a further description of commitments and contingencies.
Environmental Matters
The Company is involved in environmental remediation and ongoing compliance activities at several sites. The Company is remediating, under the oversight of Colorado authorities, the groundwater and indoor air at its owned facility and residential
neighborhoods adjacent to and near the property, which have been affected by solvents previously used at the facility. In addition, various federal and state authorities have identified the Company as a potentially responsible party for remediation at certain other sites. The Company's prior operations included numerous manufacturing and other facilities for which the Company may have responsibility under various environmental laws to address conditions that may be identified in the future. Refer to Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for a further description of specific properties.
52
Environmental
expenditures relating to an existing condition caused by past operations and that do not contribute to current or future revenue generation are expensed. Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated and are evaluated independently of any future claims recovery. Generally, the timing of these accruals coincides with completion of a feasibility study or our commitment to a formal plan of action, and our estimates of cost are subject to change as new information becomes available. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation obligations are discounted to their present value in those situations requiring only continuing maintenance and monitoring based upon a schedule of fixed payments.
Business Combination Accounting
The
Company allocates the purchase price of an acquired entity to the assets and liabilities acquired based upon their estimated fair values at the business combination date. The Company also identifies and estimates the fair values of intangible assets that should be recognized as assets apart from goodwill. A single estimate of fair value results from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and relies heavily on estimates and assumptions. The Company typically engages third-party valuation specialists to assist in the estimation of fair values for intangible assets other than goodwill, inventory and fixed assets. The carrying values of acquired receivables and trade accounts payable have historically approximated their fair values at the business combination date. With
respect to other acquired assets and liabilities, the Company uses all available information to make the best estimates of their fair values at the business combination date.
The Company’s purchase price allocation methodology contains uncertainties because it requires management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities. Management estimates the fair value of assets and liabilities based upon quoted market prices, the carrying value of the acquired assets and widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flows. Unanticipated events or circumstances may occur which could affect the accuracy of the
Company’s estimates, including assumptions regarding industry economic factors and business strategies.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company has share-based incentive compensation plans under which certain officers, employees and members of the Board of Directors are participants and may be granted restricted stock, stock performance awards and stock options. Additionally, share-based grants may be made to non-employee members of the Board of Directors in the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) payable in cash or the Company's common stock at no cost to the non-employee member of the Board of Directors. The
Company accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with the fair value recognition provisions of ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, and ASC 505, Equity, which require all share-based payments to employees and members of the Board of Directors, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized as expense in the consolidated financial statements based on their fair values. The fair value of stock options is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing formula that requires assumptions for expected volatility, expected dividends, the risk-free interest rate and the expected term of the option. Stock options generally vest over four years, with 25% vesting annually and expense is recognized on a straight-line basis separately for each vesting portion of the stock option award. Expense for restricted
stock is based on the fair value of the restricted stock on the date of grant. Expense for cliff-vesting grants is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, which is generally four years, and expense for graded-vesting grants is recognized ratably over the respective vesting periods. Expense for stock performance awards is recognized based upon the fair value of the awards on the date of grant and the anticipated number of shares or units to be awarded on a straight-line basis over the respective term of the award, or individual vesting portion of an award. Expense for the initial grant of RSUs is recognized ratably over the one-year vesting period based upon the fair value of the RSUs, and for cash-equivalent RSUs, is remeasured at the end of each period. If any of the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model or the anticipated number of shares to be awarded change significantly, share-based compensation expense may differ materially in the
future from that recorded in the current period. Refer to additional information related to share-based compensation in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Supplemental Disclosures
The Company made federal, state and foreign tax payments, net of refunds, of $21.3 million, $18.7 million and $16.9 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Refer to Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for further information regarding
income taxes.
Cash payments of interest for the Company's borrowings under the its revolving credit agreement and long-term debt during 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $17.4 million, $16.5 million and $15.2 million, respectively. Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion regarding the Company's financing arrangements.
The
change in investing activities included in liabilities was an increase (decrease) of $10.7 million, $1.9 million, and ($8.3 million) in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
53
Impact of Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), and subsequently
issued several ASUs to clarify the implementation guidance in ASU 2014-09. Topic 606 provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized, based upon the core principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 also requires additional disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The Company adopted the ASUs in the first quarter of 2018 using the modified retrospective method, which resulted in a cumulative-effect adjustment of $4.8
million to reduce retained earnings, with a corresponding $6.4 million increase to other accrued expenses and a $1.6 million decrease to deferred tax liabilities. Adoption of the standard has not significantly impacted the statement of earnings in 2018 and is not anticipated to significantly impact it on an ongoing basis. Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which requires recognition of the income tax effects of intercompany sales and intra-entity transfers of assets, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. The ASU was adopted during the first quarter of 2018
using a modified retrospective approach, which resulted in a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings of $10.5 million, with a corresponding $5.4 million reduction to an income tax asset and a $5.1 million increase to deferred tax liabilities.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The standard provides guidance to assist entities in evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions of assets or businesses. The ASU requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable
assets. The ASU also narrows the definition of a business by requiring a set of assets to include an input and at least one substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs for it to be considered a business. The Company adopted the ASU on a prospective basis during the first quarter of 2018, which had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. The ASU amended Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 715, Compensation — Retirement
Benefits, to require employers that present a measure of operating income in their statements of earnings to include only the service cost component of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in operating expenses (together with other employee compensation costs). The other components of net periodic benefit cost, including amortization of prior service cost/credit, and settlement and curtailment effects, are to be included in non-operating expenses. The Company adopted the ASU during the first quarter of 2018 on a retrospective basis using the practical expedient permitted by the ASU and reclassified $12.3 million and $15.0 million of non-service cost components of net periodic benefit income for 2017 and 2016, respectively, to other income,
net in the consolidated statements of earnings. For 2018, the non-service cost component of net periodic benefit income of $12.3 million is presented as other income. Refer to Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, which amends the hedge accounting model in ASC 815 to better portray the economic results of an entity's risk management activities in its financial statements and simplifies the application of hedge accounting in certain situations. The ASU eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness. ASU 2017-12 is effective
for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted the ASU in the first quarter of 2018, which did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other — Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40), Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract. The ASU aligns the
requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted the ASU in the third quarter of 2018 on a prospective basis, which did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In
August 2018, the SEC adopted the final rule under SEC Release No. 33-10532, Disclosure Update and Simplification, that amends certain disclosure requirements that are redundant or outdated. The rule expands the disclosure requirements for the analysis of shareholders' equity for interim financial statements. An analysis of the changes in each caption of shareholders' equity presented in the balance sheet must be provided in a note or separate statement, as well as the amount of dividends per share for each class of shares.
54
The final rule was effective on November 5, 2018. The Company adopted the
rule in the fourth quarter of 2018 and the expanded interim disclosure requirements for changes in shareholders’ equity will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2019.
Impact of Prospective Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires lessees to recognize most leases on the balance sheet. The FASB has subsequently issued ASUs with improvements to the guidance, including ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, which provides entities with an additional transition method to adopt the new standard. Under the new optional transition method, an entity initially applies
Topic 842 at the adoption date and recognizes a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. The ASUs are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018 using a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted. The Company will adopt the ASUs in the first quarter of 2019 using the optional transition method permitted by ASU 2018-11. The Company's accounting systems have been upgraded to comply with the requirements of the new standard and the Company will be implementing additional controls and changes to its processes upon adoption of the standard. The
Company will be electing the package of practical expedients and the expedient to group lease and non-lease components as permitted by the ASU; however, the hindsight practical expedient will not be elected. Due to the large number of retail operating leases to which the Company is a party, the Company anticipates that the impact to its consolidated balance sheets upon adoption in the first quarter of 2019 will result in a right-of-use asset of approximately $0.7 billion and operating lease liabilities of approximately $0.8 billion. The Company is still finalizing its transition entries, including the cumulative-effect adjustment
to retained earnings related to the calculated impairment of the right-of-use asset as of the adoption date. Ongoing impairment charges related to underperforming retail stores are expected to be greater under the new standard due to the additional required right-of-use asset associated with each asset group. The Company does not expect the adoption of the ASU to have a material impact on its cash flows. Adoption of the ASU is not expected to trigger non-compliance with any covenant or other restrictions under the provisions of any of the Company’s debt obligations.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), which
significantly changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. The ASU replaces today's "incurred loss" model with an "expected credit loss" model that requires entities to estimate an expected lifetime credit loss on financial assets, including trade accounts receivable. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted beginning after December 15, 2018. The ASUs provisions will be applied as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which it is adopted. As credit losses from the Company's trade receivables
have not historically been significant, the Company anticipates that the adoption of the ASU in the first quarter of 2020 will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework — Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 modifies disclosure requirements on fair value measurements, removing and modifying certain disclosures, while adding other disclosures. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2018-13 is not expected
to have a material impact on the Company's financial statement disclosures.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, Compensation — Retirement Benefits — Defined Benefit Plans — General (Subtopic 715-20), Disclosure Framework — Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans. The guidance changes the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement benefit plans, eliminating the requirements for certain disclosures that are no longer considered cost beneficial and requiring new disclosures that the FASB considers pertinent. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December
15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2018-14 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statement disclosures.
2. ACQUISITIONS
Acquisition of Blowfish, LLC
On July 6, 2018, the Company entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement ("Purchase Agreement") with Blowfish, LLC ("Blowfish Malibu"),
pursuant to which the Company acquired a controlling interest in Blowfish. The noncontrolling interest is subject to a mandatory purchase obligation after a three-year period based upon an earnings multiple formula, as specified in the Purchase Agreement. The aggregate purchase price is estimated to be $28.0 million, including approximately $9.0 million preliminarily assigned to the mandatory purchase obligation, which will be paid upon settlement in 2021. The remaining $19.0 million (or $16.8 million, net of $2.2 million of cash received) was funded with cash. The preliminary estimate of the mandatory purchase obligation, which is recorded within other liabilities
on the consolidated balance sheet, is presented on a discounted basis and is subject to remeasurement based on
55
the earnings formula specified in the Purchase Agreement. Accretion of the mandatory purchase obligation and any remeasurement adjustments are recorded as interest expense. The operating results of Blowfish since July 6, 2018 have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements within the Brand Portfolio segment.
Blowfish Malibu, which was founded in 2005, designs and sells women's and children's footwear that captures the
fresh youthful spirit and casual living that is distinctively Southern California. Footwear is marketed under the "Blowfish" and "Blowfish Malibu" tradenames. The acquisition allows for continued expansion of the Company's overall business and provides additional exposure to the growing sneaker and casual lifestyle segment of the market.
The Brand Portfolio segment recognized $1.7 million ($1.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.03 per diluted share) in incremental cost of goods sold in 2018 related to the amortization of the inventory fair value adjustment required for purchase accounting. In addition, the
Company incurred acquisition-related costs of $0.3 million ($0.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.01 per diluted share) in 2018, which were recorded as a component of restructuring and other special charges, net within the Other category. Refer to Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the acquisition costs.
The assets and liabilities of Blowfish Malibu were recorded at their estimated fair values, and the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including identified intangible assets, was recorded as goodwill. The Company allocated the purchase price
as of the acquisition date, July 6, 2018, as follows:
The
Company's allocation of the purchase price was based on certain preliminary valuations and analyses. During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company recorded immaterial purchase price allocation adjustments.
The Company’s purchase price allocation required management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities. A single estimate of fair value results from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and relies heavily on estimates and assumptions. The judgments the Company used in estimating the fair values assigned to each class of the acquired
assets and assumed liabilities could materially affect the results of its operations. Management estimated the fair value of the assets and liabilities based upon quoted market prices, the carrying value of the acquired assets and widely accepted
56
valuation techniques, including discounted cash flows (Level 3 fair value measurements). A third-party valuation specialist assisted the Company with its fair value estimates for inventory, intangible assets other than goodwill and the mandatory purchase obligation. The Company used all available information to make its best estimate of fair values at the acquisition
date. The Company's allocation of purchase price was considered substantially complete as of February 2, 2019.
Goodwill and intangible assets reflected above were determined to meet the criteria for recognition apart from tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The goodwill recognized, which is deductible for tax purposes, is primarily attributable to synergies and an assembled workforce. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding goodwill and intangible assets.
During the period from acquisition through February 2, 2019, Blowfish Malibu contributed $15.2
million of net sales and reported a net loss of $1.5 million. The loss reflects $1.7 million of incremental cost of goods sold related to the amortization of the inventory fair value adjustment required for purchase accounting. The net loss excludes the acquisition costs and incremental interest expense associated with the transaction.
Acquisition of Vionic
On October 18, 2018, the Company entered into an Equity and Asset Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement") with the equity holders of Vionic Group LLC and Vionic International LLC, and
VCG Holdings Ltd., a Cayman Islands corporation (collectively, "Vionic"), pursuant to which the Company acquired all of the outstanding equity interests of Vionic Group LLC and Vionic International LLC and certain related intellectual property from VCG Holdings Ltd for $360.0 million plus adjustments for cash and indebtedness, as defined in the Agreement. The aggregate purchase price is estimated to be $360.7 million (or $352.7 million, net of $8.0 million of cash received). The purchase was funded with borrowings from the Company's revolving credit agreement. The operating results
of Vionic since October 18, 2018 have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements within the Brand Portfolio segment.
Vionic, which was founded in 1979, brings together style and science, combining innovative biomechanics with the most coveted trends. As pioneers in foot health with a global team of experts behind the dual gender brand, Vionic brings a fresh perspective to stylish, supportive footwear, offering a vast selection of active, casual and dress styles, sandals and slippers. The acquisition of Vionic allows the Company to continue to expand its portfolio of brands and gives it additional access to the growing contemporary comfort footwear
category.
The Brand Portfolio segment recognized $8.9 million ($6.6 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.15 per diluted share) in incremental cost of goods sold in 2018 related to the amortization of the inventory fair value adjustment required for purchase accounting. In addition, the Company incurred acquisition and integration-related costs of $4.5 million ($3.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.08 per diluted share) in 2018, which were recorded as a component of restructuring and other special charges, net within the
Other category. Refer to Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to these costs.
57
Purchase Price Allocation
The assets and liabilities of Vionic were recorded at their estimated fair values, and the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including identified intangible assets, was recorded as goodwill. The Company has preliminarily allocated the purchase price as of the acquisition date, October 18, 2018, as follows:
The
allocation of the purchase price was based on certain preliminary valuations and analyses. Any subsequent changes in the estimated fair values assumed upon the finalization of more detailed analyses within the measurement period will change the allocation of the purchase price and will be adjusted during the period in which the amounts are determined. The Company’s purchase price allocation required management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities. A single estimate of fair value results from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and relies heavily on estimates and assumptions. The judgments the Company used in estimating the fair values assigned to each class of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities
could materially affect the results of its operations. Management estimated the fair value of the assets and liabilities based upon quoted market prices, the carrying value of the acquired assets and widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flows (Level 3 fair value measurements). A third-party valuation specialist assisted the Company with its preliminary fair value estimates for inventory and intangible assets other than goodwill. The Company used all available information to make its best estimate of fair values at the acquisition date and is still in the process of finalizing the fair value of inventories at the acquisition date.
Goodwill and intangible assets reflected above were determined
to meet the criteria for recognition apart from tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The goodwill recognized, which is deductible for tax purposes, is primarily attributable to synergies and an assembled workforce. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding goodwill and intangible assets.
58
Pro Forma Information
The table below illustrates the unaudited pro forma impact on operating results as if the acquisition had been completed as of the beginning of 2017. Prior to the acquisition, Vionic’s fiscal calendar ended on December 31 of each year. For purposes of the financial
information presented, the Company has combined the operating results of the relevant calendar year for Vionic with the Company’s actual fiscal year. For example, the information presented in the 2017 column includes Vionic’s operations for the months of January through December.
($ thousands, except per share amounts)
2018
2017
Net
sales
$
2,972,990
$
2,941,617
Net earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc.
5,432
83,800
Basic earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
$
0.12
$
1.95
Diluted
earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
$
0.12
$
1.94
For purposes of the pro forma disclosures, the pro forma adjustments primarily include the following:
•
The elimination
of material costs from 2018 that were directly attributable to the acquisition and have no continuing impact on operating results, including:
◦
the non-cash cost of goods sold impact of $8.9 million related to the fair value adjustment to the acquired inventory, and related tax effects; and
◦
transaction costs of $4.5 million, and related tax effects.
•
Amortization
of acquired intangibles of $7.9 million and $8.0 million for 2018 and 2017, respectively.
•
Estimated interest expense on additional borrowings under the Company's revolving credit agreement at the Company's current interest rate of 3.75% through 2017 and a rise in the interest rate to 4.5% in the third quarter of 2018. Assumes paydown of the revolving credit agreement to $330.0
million in the fourth quarter of 2017 and gradual paydown to $270.0 million during 2018.
•
Tax impact of the change in tax status of Vionic and the tax impact of the pro forma adjustments based on the estimated statutory tax rate in effect during the respective periods. The tax effect of the pro forma interest expense adjustments for borrowings under the Company's revolving credit agreement was calculated at 25.74% for 2018 and at 38.9% for 2017, reflecting the
Company's effective tax rates. The tax effect of the other pro forma adjustments for 2018 and 2017 was calculated utilizing an estimated effective tax rate of 28.0% and 40.0%, respectively.
The above unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and does not purport to represent what the results of operations would have been had the Company completed the acquisition on the date assumed, nor is it necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected in future periods.
During the period from the acquisition date through February
2, 2019, Vionic contributed $45.3 million of net sales and reported a net loss of approximately $8.3 million, primarily associated with the incremental cost of goods sold of $8.9 million related to the amortization of the inventory fair value adjustment required for purchase accounting. The net loss excludes the Company's acquisition costs and any incremental interest expense associated with the transaction.
Acquisition of Allen Edmonds
On December 13, 2016, the
Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") with Apollo Investors, LLC (the "Seller") and Apollo Buyer Holding Company, Inc. (the "Holding Company"), pursuant to which the Company acquired all outstanding capital stock of Allen Edmonds ("Allen Edmonds"). The aggregate purchase price for the Allen Edmonds stock was $259.9 million, net of cash received of $0.7 million. The purchase was funded with cash and funds available under the Company's revolving credit agreement. The operating results of Allen Edmonds since December 13, 2016 have been included in the
Company’s consolidated financial statements within the Brand Portfolio segment.
During 2018 and 2017, the Company incurred integration and reorganization costs totaling $5.8 million ($4.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.10 per diluted share and $4.0 million ($2.6 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.06 per diluted share), respectively, related to the men's business, as further discussed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, which were recorded as a component of restructuring and other special charges,
net. During 2016, the Company incurred acquisition and integration costs of $5.8 million ($5.0 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.11 per diluted share). In addition, the Brand Portfolio segment recognized $4.9 million ($3.0 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.07 per diluted share) in cost of goods sold in 2017 and $1.2 million ($0.7 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.02 per diluted share) in 2016 related to the amortization of the inventory fair value adjustment required for
purchase accounting. The inventory fair value adjustment was fully amortized as of July 29, 2017.
59
As further discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $98.0 million for the impairment of goodwill and the indefinite-lived tradename of the Allen Edmonds business.
3. REVENUES
Impact
of Adoption of ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
On February 4, 2018, the Company adopted Topic 606 using the modified retrospective method applied to those contracts which were not completed as of that date. Topic 606 provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized, based upon the core principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or
services. Adoption of the standard resulted in a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings of $4.8 million as of February 4, 2018 related to loyalty points issued under the Company's loyalty program ("Rewards") within the Famous Footwear segment. Topic 606 requires a deferral of revenue associated with loyalty points using a relative stand-alone selling price method rather than the incremental cost approach the Company used previously. The standard also requires the reclassification of the returns reserve from receivables to other accrued expenses and the reclassification of the return asset from inventories to prepaid expenses and other current
assets in the consolidated balance sheets. The comparative information for prior periods has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods.
60
The impact of the adoption of Topic 606 on the consolidated balance sheet as of February 2, 2019 was as follows:
Adoption of the standard also required various changes that impacted the statement of earnings (loss). These changes generally result in either a shift in the timing of revenue recognition or the reclassification
of an item from one caption on the statement of earnings (loss) to another. As disclosed above, the primary impact is related to deferring revenue at a higher rate for the Company's loyalty program. There are also reclassifications related to income received under co-op marketing arrangements with the Company's vendors and the recognition of certain sales transactions in the Company's retail stores on a net commission basis rather than recording on a gross basis. The impact of all changes related to Topic 606 to the consolidated statement of earnings (loss) for 2018 was as follows:
2018
($
thousands)
As reported
Balances without the adoption of Topic 606
Effect of change
(Lower)/Higher
Statement
of Earnings (Loss)
Net sales
$
2,834,846
$
2,837,738
$
(2,892
)
Cost
of goods sold
1,678,502
1,678,363
139
Gross profit
1,156,344
1,159,375
(3,031
)
Selling
and administrative expenses
1,041,765
1,044,440
(2,675
)
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets
98,044
98,044
—
Restructuring
and other special charges, net
16,134
16,134
—
Operating earnings
$
401
$
757
$
(356
)
The
adoption of Topic 606 had an immaterial impact on the Company's net loss or loss per share for 2018.
61
Disaggregation of Revenues
The following table disaggregates revenue by segment and major source for 2018:
2018
($
thousands)
Famous Footwear
Brand Portfolio
Total
Retail
stores
$
1,469,857
$
166,903
$
1,636,760
Landed wholesale
—
762,994
762,994
First-cost
wholesale
—
94,734
94,734
E-commerce
136,327
186,599
322,926
Licensing
and royalty
—
16,501
16,501
Other (1)
624
307
931
Net
sales
$
1,606,808
$
1,228,038
$
2,834,846
(1) Includes breakage revenue
from unredeemed gift cards.
Retail stores
The majority of the Company's revenue is generated from retail sales where control is transferred and revenue is recognized at the point of sale. Retail sales are recorded net of estimated returns and exclude sales tax. The Company carries a returns reserve and a corresponding return asset for expected returns of merchandise.
Retail sales to members of the Rewards program include two performance obligations: the sale of merchandise and the delivery of points that may be redeemed for future purchases at Famous
Footwear. The transaction price is allocated to the separate performance obligations based on the relative stand-alone selling price. The stand-alone selling price for the points is estimated using the retail value of the merchandise earned, adjusted for estimated breakage based upon historical redemption patterns. The Company has elected to adopt the practical expedient that allows entities to disregard the effect of the time value of money between payment for and receipt of goods when the sale does not include a financing element. The revenue associated with the initial merchandise purchased is recognized immediately and the value assigned to the points is deferred until the points are redeemed, forfeited or expired. Upon adoption of Topic 606 as of February 4, 2018, the Rewards program liability, included in other accrued expenses
on the consolidated balance sheets, increased $6.4 million, from $8.1 million to $14.5 million.
Landed wholesale
Landed sales are wholesale sales in which the merchandise is shipped directly to the customer from the Company’s warehouses. Many landed customers arrange their own transportation of merchandise and, with limited exceptions, control is transferred at the time of shipment.
First-cost wholesale
First-cost sales are wholesale sales in which the
Company purchases merchandise from an international factory that manufactures the product. Revenue is recognized at the time the merchandise is delivered to the customer’s designated freight forwarder and control is transferred to the customer.
E-commerce
The Company also generates revenue from sales on websites maintained by the Company that are shipped from the Company's distribution centers or retail stores directly to the consumer, picked up directly by the consumer
from the Company's stores, sales to online-only retailers and e-commerce sales from our wholesale customers' websites that are fulfilled on a drop-ship basis (collectively referred to as "e-commerce"). The Company transfers control and recognizes revenue for merchandise sold that is shipped directly to an individual consumer upon delivery to the consumer.
Licensing and royalty
The Company has license agreements with third parties allowing them to sell the
Company’s branded product, or other merchandise that uses the Company’s owned or licensed brand names. These license agreements provide the licensee access to the Company's symbolic intellectual property, and revenue is therefore recognized over the license term. For royalty contracts that do not have guaranteed minimums, the Company recognizes revenue as the licensee's sales occur. For royalty contracts that have guaranteed minimums, revenue
62
for
the guaranteed minimum is recognized on a straight-line basis during the term, until such time that the cumulative royalties exceed the total minimum guarantee. Up-front payments are recognized over the contractual term to which the guaranteed minimum relates.
Revenue is recorded at the transaction price, net of estimates for variable consideration for which reserves are established, including returns, allowances and discounts. Variable consideration is estimated using the expected value method and given the large number of contracts with similar characteristics, the portfolio approach is applied to determine the variable consideration
for each revenue stream. Reserves for projected returns are based on historical patterns and current expectations.
Information about significant contract balances from contracts with customers is as follows:
Changes
in contract balances with customers generally reflect differences in relative sales volume for the period presented. In addition, during 2018, the Rewards program liability increased $14.2 million due to purchases and $6.4 million due to the adoption of Topic 606 and decreased $14.1 million due to expirations and redemptions. The change in the balance of the returns reserve is primarily due to the impact of account reclassifications required by adoption of Topic 606 on February 4, 2018 and the acquisition
of Vionic in October 2018, as further described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
4. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
The Company uses the two-class method to compute basic and diluted earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders. In periods of net loss, no effect is given to the Company’s participating securities since they do not contractually participate in the losses of the Company.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders:
(in
$ thousands, except per share amounts)
2018
2017
2016
NUMERATOR
Net
(loss) earnings
$
(5,481
)
$
87,231
$
66,086
Net loss (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests
40
(31
)
(428
)
Net
earnings allocated to participating securities
—
(2,384
)
(1,750
)
Net (loss) earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc. after allocation of earnings to participating securities
$
(5,441
)
$
84,816
$
63,908
DENOMINATOR
Denominator
for basic (loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
41,756
41,801
42,026
Dilutive effect of share-based awards
—
179
155
Denominator
for diluted (loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
41,756
41,980
42,181
Basic
(loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
$
(0.13
)
$
2.03
$
1.52
Diluted
(loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
$
(0.13
)
$
2.02
$
1.52
63
Options
to purchase 16,667 and 63,915 shares of common stock in 2017 and 2016, respectively, were not included in the denominator for diluted earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders because the effect would be antidilutive. There were no options to purchase shares excluded from the denominator in 2018. Due to the Company's net loss attributable to Caleres, Inc. in 2018, the denominator for diluted loss per common share attributed to Caleres, Inc. shareholders is the same as the denominator for basic loss per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders.
The
Company repurchased 1,465,649, 225,000 and 900,000 shares during the years ended February 2, 2019, February 3, 2018 and January 28, 2017, respectively, under the 2011 and 2018 publicly announced share repurchase programs, which permits repurchases of up to 2.5 million shares in each program, as further discussed in Item 5, Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. As of February 2,
2019, the Company has repurchased a total of 2.7 million shares at a cost of $77.8 million.
5. RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER INITIATIVES, NET
Acquisition, Integration and Reorganization of Men's Brands
On December 13, 2016, the Company acquired the outstanding capital stock
of Allen Edmonds, as further discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. During 2018 and 2017, the Company incurred integration and reorganization costs, primarily for professional fees and severance, totaling $5.8 million ($4.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.10 per diluted share) and $4.0 million ($2.6 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.06 per diluted share), respectively, related to the men's business. These charges are presented in restructuring and other special charges in the consolidated statements of earnings (loss). Of the $5.8 million
of costs in 2018, $5.4 million is included in the Brand Portfolio segment and $0.4 million is reflected within the Other category. Of the $4.0 million of costs in 2017, $2.5 million is reflected within the Other category and $1.5 million is included in the Brand Portfolio segment. During 2016, the Company incurred acquisition and integration-related costs totaling $5.8 million ($5.0 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.11 per diluted share), of which $5.2 million was reflected
within the Other category and $0.6 million was reflected within the Brand Portfolio segment. As of February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, restructuring reserves of $1.7 million and $0.2 million, respectively, were included in other accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets.
Acquisition and Integration-Related Costs
Vionic
On October 18, 2018, the Company acquired
all of the outstanding equity interests of Vionic Group LLC and Vionic International LLC. During 2018, the Company incurred acquisition and integration-related costs associated with the acquisition totaling $4.5 million ($3.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.08 per diluted share), primarily for professional fees, which are reflected within the Other category and are presented as restructuring and other special charges, net in the consolidated statements of earnings (loss). As of February 2, 2019, restructuring reserves of $0.5 million were included in other accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets. Refer to further discussion of the acquisition
in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
Blowfish Malibu
On July 6, 2018, the Company acquired a controlling interest in Blowfish Malibu, as further discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. The Company incurred acquisition and integration-related costs associated with the acquisition of Blowfish Malibu of $0.3 million ($0.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.01 per diluted share) during 2018, which are presented as restructuring and other special charges,
net in the consolidated statements of earnings (loss) and reflected within the Other category. As of February 2, 2019, restructuring reserves of $0.1 million were included in other accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheet.
Logistics Transition
During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company incurred costs of $4.5 million ($3.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.08 per diluted share) associated with the transition from a third-party operated warehouse in Chino, California to new company-operated
Brand Portfolio warehouse facilities in California, as well as the transition of the Allen Edmonds distribution center in Port Washington, Wisconsin to the Company's existing retail distribution center in Lebanon, Tennessee. These charges are presented as restructuring and other special charges within the Brand Portfolio segment.
Brand and Business Exits
During 2018, the Company incurred costs of $2.4 million ($1.8 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.04 per diluted share) related to the decision to exit the Diane von Furstenberg
("DVF") and George Brown Bilt ("GBB") brands. Of these charges within the Brand Portfolio segment, $1.8 million primarily represents incremental inventory markdowns required to reduce the value of inventory to net realizable
64
value and is presented in cost of goods sold on the statements of earnings (loss), while the remaining $0.6 million is for severance and other related costs and presented in restructuring and other special charges.
During 2016, the Company incurred costs of $4.2
million ($3.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.08 per diluted share) related to the planned exit of its international e-commerce business and other restructuring. Approximately $2.6 million represents severance and closure costs and were presented within restructuring and other special charges, net within the Brand Portfolio segment. The remaining $1.6 million, which was included in cost of goods sold within the Brand Portfolio segment, represents incremental inventory markdowns required to reduce the value of inventory to net realizable value.
Retail Operations Restructuring
During 2018
and 2017, the Company incurred costs, primarily for severance expense, of $0.4 million ($0.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.01 per diluted share) and $0.9 million ($0.6 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.02 per diluted share), respectively, related to restructuring of its retail operations, which are presented in restructuring and other special charges in the consolidated statements of earnings (loss). All of the costs for 2018 are presented within the Famous Footwear segment. Of the $0.9 million in charges for 2017, $0.6 million
is reflected within the Famous Footwear segment, $0.2 million is reflected within the Other category and $0.1 million is included in the Brand Portfolio segment.
Impairment of Note Receivable
In conjunction with the 2014 sale of Shoes.com, the Company received a $7.5 million face value secured convertible note ("convertible note") at closing. On January 27, 2017, Shoes.com announced the business had ceased operating and would be working with creditors to liquidate. In conjunction with the announcement, the
Company recorded an impairment charge of $8.0 million ($4.9 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.11 per diluted share), comprised of the fair value of the convertible note of $7.3 million, and associated accounts receivable of $0.7 million. Of the $8.0 million in costs recorded in restructuring and other special charges, net during 2016, $7.3 million was reflected within the Other category and $0.7 million was reflected within the Brand Portfolio segment.
Impairment of Investment in Nonconsolidated Affiliate
During
2016, the Company determined that its $7.0 million in a nonconsolidated affiliate that was accounted for using the cost method had an other-than-temporary decline in its fair value that exceeded its carrying value. The Company recorded an impairment charge in 2016 of $7.0 million ($7.0 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.16 per diluted share) in restructuring and other special charges, net, which was included in the Other category.
6. RETIREMENT AND OTHER
BENEFIT PLANS
The Company sponsors pension plans in both the United States and Canada. The Company’s domestic pension plans cover substantially all United States employees. Under the domestic plans, salaried, management and certain hourly employees’ pension benefits are based on a two-rate formula applied to each year of service. Participants receive the larger of the accrued benefit as of December 31, 2015 (based on service commencing at the date of hire and a 35-year service cap and an average annual salary for the five
highest consecutive years during the last 10 year period) and the benefit calculated under the current plan provisions using pay and service from the date of hire. Generally, under the current plan provisions, a participant receives credit for one year of service for each 365 days of employment as an eligible employee with the Company commencing after the employee's date of participation in the plan, up to 30 years. A service credit of 0.825% is applied to that portion of the average annual salary for the last 10 years that does not exceed “covered compensation,” which is the 35-year
average compensation subject to FICA tax based on a participant’s year of birth, and a service credit of 1.425% is applied to that portion of the average salary during those 10 years that exceeds said level. During 2017, the Company announced changes to the domestic qualified pension plan that became effective in January 2019. Except for grandfathered employees and certain hourly associates in the Company's retail divisions, final average compensation, taxable covered compensation and credit service for purposes of determining accrued pension benefits were frozen as of December 31, 2018.
As
discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company acquired Blowfish Malibu on July 6, 2018. In conjunction with the acquisition, the Company acquired pension assets and assumed pension benefit obligations. These pension assets and benefit obligations were remeasured to reflect the funded status as of the date of the acquisition, which resulted in $2.4 million of acquired pension assets and $2.0 million of assumed benefit obligations.
The Company’s Canadian pension plans
cover certain employees based on plan specifications. Under the Canadian plans, employees’ pension benefits are based on the employee’s highest consecutive five years of compensation during the 10 years before retirement. The Company’s funding policy for all plans is to make the minimum annual contributions required by applicable regulations. The Company also maintains an unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”).
65
In addition to providing pension benefits,
the Company sponsors unfunded defined benefit postretirement life insurance plans that cover both salaried and hourly employees who became eligible for benefits by January 1, 1995. The life insurance plans provide coverage of up to $20 thousand dollars for qualifying retired employees.
Benefit Obligations
The following table sets forth changes in benefit obligations, including all domestic and Canadian plans:
Pension
Benefits
Other Postretirement Benefits
($ thousands)
2018
2017
2018
2017
Benefit
obligation at beginning of year
$
356,469
$
340,278
$
1,594
$
1,666
Service
cost
8,995
9,705
—
—
Interest cost
14,236
14,948
59
68
Plan
participants’ contribution
10
11
6
7
Plan amendments
254
(2,985
)
—
—
Actuarial
(gain) loss
(21,541
)
18,505
(22
)
40
Benefits paid
(14,352
)
(13,703
)
(176
)
(187
)
Settlement
gain
(3,656
)
—
—
—
Curtailments
—
(10,534
)
—
—
Foreign
exchange rate changes
(230
)
244
—
—
Acquisitions
2,007
—
—
—
Benefit
obligation at end of year
$
342,192
$
356,469
$
1,461
$
1,594
The
accumulated benefit obligation for the United States pension plans was $335.1 million and $346.9 million as of February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation for the Canadian pension plans was $3.8 million and $4.2 million as of February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, respectively.
Pension
Benefits
Other Postretirement Benefits
Weighted–average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations, end of year
2018
2017
2018
2017
Discount
rate
4.35
%
4.00
%
4.35
%
4.00
%
Rate of compensation increase
3.00
%
3.00
%
N/A
N/A
As
of February 2, 2019, the Company is using the RP-2014 Bottom Quartile tables, projected using generational scale MP-2018, an updated projection scale issued by the Society of Actuaries in 2018, grading to 0.75% by 2034, to estimate the plan liabilities. Actuarial gains, related to the change in mortality projection scales, reduced the projected benefit obligation by approximately $1.1 million as of February 2, 2019.
The Company made certain amendments to the domestic qualified pension
plan and the SERP, including certain changes to eligibility and service period requirements and changes to the benefit formula, including the calculation of participants' final average compensation. These plan amendments, which became effective in either January 2015 or January 2016, increased the pension liability by $3.0 million as of February 3, 2018. The plan amendment to freeze accrued pension benefits for the majority of pension plan participants, which became effective in January 2019, resulted in a curtailment that decreased the pension liability by $10.5 million as of February 3, 2018 and increased the net periodic benefit income for 2017 by $2.2 million.
66
Plan
Assets
Pension assets are managed in accordance with the prudent investor standards of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). The plan’s investment objective is to earn a competitive total return on assets, while also ensuring plan assets are adequately managed to provide for future pension obligations. This results in the protection of plan surplus and is accomplished by matching the duration of the projected benefit obligation using leveraged fixed income instruments and, while maintaining an equity commitment, managing an equity overlay strategy. The overlay strategy is intended to protect the managed equity portfolios against adverse stock market environments. The Company delegates investment management of the plan assets to specialists in each asset class and regularly monitors manager performance and compliance
with investment guidelines. The Company’s overall investment strategy is to achieve a mix of approximately 97% of investments for long-term growth and 3% for near-term benefit payments with a wide diversification of asset types, fund strategies and fund managers. The target allocations for plan assets for 2018 were 70% equities and 30% debt securities. Allocations may change periodically based upon changing market conditions. Equities did not include any Company stock at February 2, 2019 or February 3,
2018.
Assets of the Canadian pension plans, which total approximately $4.2 million at February 2, 2019, were invested 55% in equity funds, 42% in bond funds and 3% in money market funds. The Canadian pension plans did not include any Company stock as of February 2, 2019 or February 3, 2018.
A
financial instrument’s level within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Refer to further discussion on the fair value hierarchy in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements. Following is a description of the pension plan investments measured at fair value, including the general classification of such investments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
•
Cash and cash equivalents include cash collateral and margin as well as money market funds. The fair values are based on unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets with sufficient volume and frequency and therefore are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
•
Investments
in U.S. government securities, mutual funds, real estate investment trusts, exchange-traded funds, corporate stocks - common, preferred securities and S&P 500 Index put and call options (traded on security exchanges) are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because the fair values are based on unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets with sufficient volume and frequency. Certain U.S. government securities are not traded on an exchange and are based on observable inputs that can be corroborated. Therefore, these investments are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Certain preferred securities were offered in a private placement. The fair value of these investments is based on unobservable prices and therefore, they are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
•
The
alternative investment fund, with a fair value of $13.2 million and $13.4 million as of February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, respectively, is an investment in a pool of long-duration domestic investment grade assets. This investment is valued at fair value based on vendor-quoted pricing for which inputs are observable and can be corroborated and therefore, are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
•
The unallocated insurance contract
is valued at contract value, which approximates fair value; therefore, this contract is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The unallocated insurance contract fair value was $0.1 million as of both February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018.
The
following table sets forth changes in the fair value of plan assets, including all domestic and Canadian plans:
Pension Benefits
Other Postretirement Benefits
($ thousands)
2018
2017
2018
2017
Fair
value of plan assets at beginning of year
$
407,081
$
361,956
$
—
$
—
Actual
return on plan assets
(13,677
)
58,106
—
—
Employer contributions
3,847
450
170
180
Plan
participants’ contributions
10
11
6
7
Benefits paid
(14,352
)
(13,703
)
(176
)
(187
)
Settlement
gain
(3,656
)
—
—
—
Foreign exchange rate changes
(243
)
261
—
—
Acquisitions
2,440
—
—
—
Fair
value of plan assets at end of year
$
381,450
$
407,081
$
—
$
—
Funded
Status
The over-funded status as of February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018 for pension benefits was $39.3 million and $50.6 million, respectively. The under-funded status as of February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018 for other postretirement benefits was $1.5 million and $1.6 million, respectively.
68
Amounts
recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of:
The
projected benefit obligation, the accumulated benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets for pension plans with a projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets and for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets, which includes only the Company’s SERP, were as follows:
Projected
Benefit Obligation Exceeds the Fair Value of Plan Assets
Accumulated Benefit Obligation Exceeds the Fair Value of Plan Assets
($ thousands)
2018
2017
2018
2017
End
of Year
Projected benefit obligation
$
8,565
$
11,959
$
8,565
$
11,959
Accumulated
benefit obligation
7,291
10,956
7,291
10,956
Fair value of plan assets
—
—
—
—
The
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation exceeds assets for all of the Company’s other postretirement benefit plans.
The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss that have not yet been recognized as components of net periodic benefit income at February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, and the expected amortization of the February 2, 2019 amounts as components of net periodic benefit income for fiscal year 2019, are as follows:
Pension
Benefits
Other Postretirement Benefits
($ thousands)
2018
2017
2018
2017
Components
of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
Net actuarial loss (gain)
$
34,879
$
22,424
$
(558
)
$
(634
)
Net
prior service credit
(3,266
)
(4,618
)
—
—
$
31,613
$
17,806
$
(558
)
$
(634
)
Pension
Benefits
Other Postretirement Benefits
($ thousands)
2019
2019
Expected amortization,
net of tax:
Amortization of net actuarial loss (gain)
$
3,624
$
(116
)
Amortization
of net prior service credit
(1,486
)
—
$
2,138
$
(116
)
69
Net
Periodic Benefit Income
Net periodic benefit income for 2018, 2017 and 2016 for all domestic and Canadian plans included the following components:
Pension
Benefits
Other Postretirement Benefits
($ thousands)
2018
2017
2016
2018
2017
2016
Service
cost
$
8,995
$
9,705
$
8,288
$
—
$
—
$
—
Interest
cost
14,236
14,948
15,275
59
68
76
Expected
return on assets
(29,091
)
(27,589
)
(28,949
)
—
—
—
Amortization
of:
Actuarial
loss (gain)
4,122
4,315
272
(125
)
(145
)
(163
)
Prior
service credit
(1,567
)
(1,780
)
(1,840
)
—
—
—
Settlement
cost
324
—
259
—
—
—
Cost
of contractual termination benefits
—
—
77
—
—
—
Curtailments
—
(2,165
)
—
—
—
—
Total
net periodic benefit income
$
(2,981
)
$
(2,566
)
$
(6,618
)
$
(66
)
$
(77
)
$
(87
)
As
further discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, as a result of the adoption of ASU 2017-07, Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, on a retrospective basis during the first quarter of 2018, the non-service cost components of net periodic benefit income are included in other income, net in the consolidated statements of earnings (loss). Service cost is included in selling and administrative expenses.
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit income:
Pension
Benefits
Other Postretirement Benefits
2018
2017
2016
2018
2017
2016
Discount
rate
4.00
%
4.40
%
4.70
%
4.00
%
4.40
%
4.70
%
Rate
of compensation increase
3.00
%
3.00
%
3.00
%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Expected
return on plan assets
8.00
%
8.00
%
8.00
%
N/A
N/A
N/A
The
net actuarial loss (gain) subject to amortization is amortized on a straight-line basis over the average future service of active plan participants as of the measurement date. The prior service credit is amortized on a straight-line basis over the average future service of active plan participants benefiting under the plan at the time of each plan amendment.
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on historical and projected rates of return for current and planned asset classes in the plan’s investment portfolio. Assumed projected rates of return for each asset class were selected after analyzing experience and future expectations of the returns. The overall expected rate of return for the portfolio was developed based on the target allocation for each asset class.
70
Expected
Cash Flows
Information about expected cash flows for all pension and postretirement benefit plans follows:
Pension Benefits
($
thousands)
Funded Plan
SERP
Total
Other Postretirement Benefits
Employer Contributions
2019
expected contributions to plan trusts
$
97
$
—
$
97
$
—
2019
expected contributions to plan participants
—
1,699
1,699
247
2019 refund of assets (e.g. surplus) to employer
133
—
133
—
Expected
Benefit Payments
2019
$
13,511
$
1,699
$
15,210
$
247
2020
14,308
1,276
15,584
217
2021
15,151
1,564
16,715
189
2022
15,818
1,335
17,153
164
2023
16,406
1,831
18,237
141
2024
– 2028
91,183
1,704
92,887
441
Defined Contribution Plans
The
Company’s domestic defined contribution 401(k) plan covers salaried and certain hourly employees. Company contributions represent a partial matching of employee contributions, generally up to a maximum of 3.5% of the employee’s salary and bonus. In January 2018, the Company announced certain changes to the Plan that became effective on January 1, 2019. For eligible salaried employees, the Company will make a core contribution of 1.5% and a matching contribution of up to 3.0% of the employee's contributions. In addition, the Company
has the discretion to contribute up to an additional 2.0% profit-sharing benefit based on the Company’s performance. The Company’s expense for this plan was $4.4 million in 2018, $3.9 million in 2017, and $3.5 million in 2016.
The Company’s Canadian defined contribution plan covers certain salaried and hourly employees. The
Company makes contributions for all eligible employees, ranging from 3% to 5% of the employee’s salary. In addition, eligible employees may voluntarily contribute to the plan. The Company’s expense for this plan was $0.2 million in both 2018 and 2016 and $0.3 million in 2017.
Deferred Compensation Plan
The Company has a non-qualified deferred compensation plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”)
for the benefit of certain management employees. The investment funds offered to the participants generally correspond to the funds offered in the Company’s 401(k) plan and the account balance fluctuates with the investment returns on those funds. The Deferred Compensation Plan permits the deferral of up to 50% of base salary and 100% of compensation received under the Company’s annual incentive plan. The deferrals are held in a separate trust, which has been established by the Company to administer the Deferred Compensation Plan. The assets of the trust are subject to the claims of the
Company’s creditors in the event that the Company becomes insolvent. Consequently, the trust qualifies as a grantor trust for income tax purposes (i.e., a “Rabbi Trust”). The liabilities of the Deferred Compensation Plan of $7.3 million and $6.4 million as of February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, respectively, are presented in employee compensation and benefits in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The assets held by the trust of $7.3 million as of February 2, 2019
and $6.4 million as of February 3, 2018 are classified as trading securities within prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, with changes in the deferred compensation charged to selling and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings (loss).
Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors
Non-employee directors are eligible to participate in a deferred compensation plan, whereby deferred compensation amounts are valued as if invested in the Company’s common stock through the use of phantom stock units (“PSUs”). Under
the plan, each participating director’s account is credited with the number of PSUs equal to the number of shares of the Company’s common stock that the participant could purchase or receive with the amount of the deferred compensation, based upon the fair value (as determined based on the average of the high and low prices) of the Company’s common stock on the last trading day of the fiscal quarter when the cash compensation was earned. Dividend equivalents are paid on PSUs at the same rate as dividends on the Company’s common stock and are re-invested in additional PSUs at the next fiscal quarter-end. The PSUs are payable in cash based on the number of PSUs credited to the participating director’s account, valued on the
basis of the fair value at fiscal quarter-end on or following termination of the director’s service. The liabilities of the plan of $2.4 million as of February 2, 2019 and $2.3 million as of February 3, 2018 are based on 70,123 and 69,527 outstanding PSUs, respectively, and are presented in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Gains and losses
71
resulting from changes in the
fair value of the PSUs are charged to selling and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings (loss).
7. INCOME TAXES
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) was signed into law, making significant changes to the U.S. Internal Revenue Code ("IRC"). Changes included, but were not limited to, a corporate tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, the transition of
U.S. international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a quasi-territorial tax system and a one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings. In December 2017, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (“SAB 118”) to address the application of GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Act. SAB 118 permitted provisional amounts to be recorded until December 2018. In accordance with SAB 118, the Company recorded a provisional income tax benefit of $0.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2017, the period in which the legislation was enacted. The provisional income tax benefit was comprised of a $24.6
million deferred tax benefit for the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities to the 21% rate at which they were expected to reverse, partially offset by a one-time tax expense on deemed repatriation of $22.9 million and $1.4 million deferred tax expense recorded in connection with IRC section 162(m) and other provisions in the Act. Certain states and other international jurisdictions also enacted changes to their tax statutes. During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company completed its analysis of the impacts of the Act, as well as changes to state and other jurisdictions, and recorded an aggregate net tax benefit of $3.9 million associated with adjustments related to
income tax reform across all jurisdictions.
The Act also includes the Global Intangibles Low-Taxed Income ("GILTI") provision, a new minimum tax on global intangible low-taxed income, the Base Erosion Anti-Avoidance ("BEAT"), a new tax for certain payments to foreign related parties and the Foreign-Derived Intangible Income ("FDII") provision, a tax incentive to earn income from the sale, lease or license of goods and services abroad. The Company has elected to account for the GILTI provision as a period cost in the year the taxes are incurred. During 2018, the Company recorded an income tax provision of $0.6 million related to the GILTI and FDII
provisions of the Act.
The components of (loss) earnings before income taxes consisted of domestic earnings before income taxes of $40.0 million, $78.2 million and $60.9 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company's foreign loss before income taxes was $45.8 million in 2018, reflecting the impairment of the tradename and goodwill for the Allen Edmonds business, and foreign earnings before incomes taxes were $44.5 million
and $36.4 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The components of income tax (benefit) provision on (loss) earnings were as follows:
($ thousands)
2018
2017
2016
Federal
Current
$
1,953
$
31,102
$
10,577
Deferred
4,451
(10,358
)
14,164
6,404
20,744
24,741
State
Current
(718
)
7,691
3,844
Deferred
1,284
913
(1,157
)
566
8,604
2,687
Foreign
(7,243
)
6,127
3,740
Total
income tax (benefit) provision
$
(273
)
$
35,475
$
31,168
72
The
differences between the income tax (benefit) provision reflected in the consolidated financial statements and the amounts calculated at the federal statutory income tax rate were as follows:
($ thousands)
2018
2017
2016
Income
taxes at statutory rate (1)
$
(1,208
)
$
41,376
$
34,039
State income taxes, net
of federal tax benefit
2,519
3,579
3,149
Foreign earnings taxed at lower rates
(4,210
)
(8,072
)
(8,404
)
Excess
tax benefit related to share-based plans
(347
)
(1,265
)
—
Income tax reform, net benefit
(3,891
)
(294
)
—
GILTI
and FDII provisions
613
—
—
Non-deductibility of goodwill impairment
7,989
—
—
Impairment
of foreign tradename taxed at higher rate
(2,400
)
—
—
Valuation allowance release on state loss carryforwards
—
(100
)
—
Valuation
allowance release on other tax carryforwards
—
—
(179
)
Valuation allowance for impairment of investment in nonconsolidated affiliate
—
—
2,450
Non-deductibility
of acquisition costs
46
—
1,280
Settlement of federal and state audit matters
—
—
(945
)
Other
616
251
(222
)
Total
income tax (benefit) provision
$
(273
)
$
35,475
$
31,168
(1) The federal statutory tax rate was 21.0% in 2018, 33.7%
in 2017, and 35.0% in 2016.
In 2018, the Company's effective tax rate was impacted by several factors, including the non-deductibility of the Company's goodwill impairment charge of $38.0 million. In addition, discrete tax benefits totaling $5.9 million were recognized in 2018, primarily reflecting adjustments associated with the Act and related actions for state and other international jurisdictions (in aggregate, "income tax reform"). In addition, our foreign earnings are generally subject to lower tax rates, and therefore a higher mix of
foreign earnings generally results in a lower consolidated effective tax rate. If these discrete tax benefits and the impairment charges had not been recognized, the Company's effective tax rate would have been 22.3%, which is lower than prior periods due to the lower statutory tax rates associated with income tax reform.
The other category of income tax provision principally represents the impact of expenses that are not deductible or partially deductible for federal income tax purposes, and adjustments in the amounts of deferred tax assets that are anticipated to be realized. In 2018, the other category includes a $2.1 million provision related to the 162(m) provisions related to the non-deductibility
of certain executive compensation, partially offset by a $1.3 million benefit related to the Company's return-to-provision settlement for the 2017 tax year.
73
Significant components of the Company’s deferred income tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
Impairment
of investment in nonconsolidated affiliate
1,470
1,470
Other
1,831
1,234
Total
deferred tax assets, before valuation allowance
57,104
48,829
Valuation allowance
(4,199
)
(5,763
)
Total
deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
$
52,905
$
43,066
Deferred
Tax Liabilities
Retirement plans
$
(10,212
)
$
(13,071
)
LIFO
inventory valuation
(42,427
)
(42,032
)
Capitalized software
(3,879
)
(4,141
)
Depreciation
(10,662
)
(1,786
)
Intangible
assets
(24,763
)
(28,831
)
Other
(1,115
)
(1,567
)
Total
deferred tax liabilities
(93,058
)
(91,428
)
Net deferred tax liability
$
(40,153
)
$
(48,362
)
As
of February 2, 2019, the Company had various state and international net operating loss carryforwards totaling $6.7 million, with expiration dates between 2019 and 2038. The Company's state net operating loss carryforwards have tax values totaling $6.3 million, for which the Company has recorded a valuation allowance of $2.7 million. The remaining net operating loss will be carried forward to future tax
years. The Company also has a valuation allowance of $1.5 million related to the impairment of an investment in a nonconsolidated affiliate, as further described in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.
As of February 2, 2019, no deferred taxes have been provided on the accumulated unremitted earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries that are not subject to United States income tax, beyond the amounts recorded for the one-time
transition tax for the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings, as required by the Act. The Company periodically evaluates its foreign investment opportunities and plans, as well as its foreign working capital needs, to determine the level of investment required and, accordingly, determines the level of foreign earnings that is considered indefinitely reinvested. Based upon that evaluation, earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries that are not otherwise subject to United States taxation are considered to be indefinitely reinvested, and accordingly, deferred taxes have not been provided. If changes occur in future investment opportunities and plans, those changes will be reflected when known
and may result in providing residual United States deferred taxes on unremitted foreign earnings. If the Company’s unremitted foreign earnings were not considered indefinitely reinvested as of February 2, 2019, an immaterial amount of additional deferred taxes would have been provided.
Uncertain Tax Positions
ASC 740, Income Taxes, establishes a single model to address accounting for uncertain tax positions. The standard clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. The standard
also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company had no unrecognized tax benefits as of February 2, 2019 or February 3, 2018.
For federal purposes, the Company’s tax years 2015 to 2017 (fiscal years ending January 30, 2016, January 28, 2017
and February 3, 2018) remain open to examination. The Company also files tax returns in various foreign jurisdictions and numerous states for which various tax years are subject to examination. The Company does not expect any significant changes in its liability for uncertain tax positions during the next 12 months.
74
8. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
The
Company's reportable segments are Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio.
The Famous Footwear segment is comprised of Famous Footwear and Famous.com. Famous Footwear operated 992 stores at the end of 2018, primarily selling branded footwear for the entire family.
The Brand Portfolio segment is comprised of our branded footwear, our branded retail stores and e-commerce sites associated with those brands. This segment sources and markets licensed, branded and private-label footwear primarily to national chains, online retailers, department stores, mass merchandisers, independent retailers and catalogs as well as Company-owned Famous Footwear, Allen Edmonds, Naturalizer and Sam Edelman stores,
and e-commerce businesses. The Brand Portfolio segment included 146 branded retail stores in the United States, 82 branded retail stores in Canada, and one branded retail store in Italy at the end of 2018.
The Company’s Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio reportable segments are operating units that are managed separately. An operating segment’s performance is evaluated and resources are allocated based primarily on operating earnings (loss). Operating earnings (loss) represents gross profit, less selling and administrative expenses, impairment of goodwill and intangible assets and restructuring and other special
charges, net. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Intersegment sales are generally recorded at a profit to the selling segment. All intersegment earnings related to inventory on hand at the purchasing segment are eliminated against the earnings of the selling segment.
Corporate assets, administrative expenses and other costs and recoveries that are not allocated to the operating units are reported in the Other category.
75
Following is a summary of certain key financial measures for the respective periods:
($
thousands)
Famous Footwear
Brand Portfolio
Other
Total
Fiscal 2018
External
sales
$
1,606,808
$
1,228,038
$
—
$
2,834,846
Intersegment sales
—
85,513
—
85,513
Depreciation
and amortization
28,816
20,768
13,113
62,697
Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount
—
—
2,210
2,210
Operating
earnings (loss)
85,268
(42,206
)
(42,661
)
401
Segment assets
502,507
1,211,008
125,053
1,838,568
Purchases
of property and equipment
17,552
41,993
2,938
62,483
Capitalized software
351
814
3,251
4,416
Fiscal
2017
External sales
$
1,637,627
$
1,147,957
$
—
$
2,785,584
Intersegment
sales
—
85,124
—
85,124
Depreciation and amortization
29,990
16,873
17,207
64,070
Amortization
of debt issuance costs and debt discount
—
—
1,761
1,761
Operating earnings (loss)
92,230
80,212
(44,759
)
127,683
Segment
assets
500,862
814,508
174,045
1,489,415
Purchases of property and equipment
22,920
15,865
5,935
44,720
Capitalized
software
483
232
5,743
6,458
Fiscal
2016
External sales
$
1,590,065
$
989,323
$
—
$
2,579,388
Intersegment
sales
—
91,415
—
91,415
Depreciation and amortization
27,832
11,028
17,271
56,131
Amortization
of debt issuance costs and debt discount
—
—
1,726
1,726
Operating earnings (loss)
83,735
76,248
(63,991
)
95,992
Segment
assets
526,555
838,328
110,390
1,475,273
Purchases of property and equipment
37,697
8,828
3,998
50,523
Capitalized
software
3,468
50
5,521
9,039
Following is a reconciliation of operating earnings to (loss) earnings before income taxes:
($
thousands)
2018
2017
2016
Operating earnings
$
401
$
127,683
$
95,992
Interest
expense, net
(18,277
)
(17,325
)
(13,731
)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
(186
)
—
—
Other
income, net
12,308
12,348
14,993
(Loss) earnings before income taxes
$
(5,754
)
$
122,706
$
97,254
For
geographic purposes, the domestic operations include the Company's domestic retail operations, the wholesale distribution of licensed, branded and private-label footwear to a variety of retail customers, including the Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio stores, as well as the Company's e-commerce businesses.
The Company’s foreign operations consist of wholesale and retail operations primarily in the Far East, Canada and Italy. The Far East operations include first-cost transactions, where footwear is sold at foreign ports to customers who then import the footwear into the United States and other countries.
76
A
summary of the Company’s net sales and long-lived assets by geographic area were as follows:
($ thousands)
2018
2017
2016
Net
Sales
United States
$
2,656,928
$
2,603,725
$
2,385,111
Far
East
93,883
98,287
134,430
Canada
63,354
75,764
59,847
Latin
America and other
20,681
7,808
—
Total net sales
$
2,834,846
$
2,785,584
$
2,579,388
Long-Lived
Assets
United States
$
771,705
$
450,323
$
617,211
Europe
79,320
177,755
286
Canada
8,256
10,878
10,141
Far
East
1,560
1,686
1,814
Other
1,280
1,984
2,076
Total
long-lived assets
$
862,121
$
642,626
$
631,528
Long-lived assets consisted
primarily of property and equipment, intangible assets, goodwill, prepaid pension costs and other noncurrent assets.
9. INVENTORIES
The Company's net inventory balance was comprised of the following:
As of February 2,
2019 and February 3, 2018, the Company's inventory balance included $1.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively, of product subject to a consignment arrangement with wholesale customers.
10. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consisted of the following:
Total
assets financed under capital leases as of February 2, 2019 were $3.1 million. There were no assets financed under capital leases as of February 3, 2018.
Useful lives of property and equipment are as follows:
Buildings
5-30 years
Leasehold improvements
5-20 years
Technology
equipment
2-7 years
Machinery and equipment
4-20 years
Furniture and fixtures
3-10 years
The Company recorded charges for impairment within selling and administrative expenses of $3.7 million, $3.8 million and $1.6 million in 2018, 2017
and 2016, respectively, primarily for leasehold improvements and furniture and fixtures in the Company’s retail stores. Fair value was based on estimated future cash flows to be generated by retail stores, discounted at a market rate of interest.
Interest costs for major asset additions are capitalized during the construction or development period and amortized over the lives of the related assets. The Company capitalized interest of $0.2 million in 2018 related to the new company-operated Brand Portfolio warehouse facilities in California, with no
corresponding interest capitalized in 2017. The Company capitalized interest of $1.4 million in 2016 related to its expansion and modernization project at its Lebanon, Tennessee distribution center.
As
further described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company acquired Vionic on October 18, 2018. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price resulted in estimated incremental intangible assets of $144.7 million, consisting of trademarks and customer relationships of $112.4 million and $32.3 million, respectively, and incremental goodwill of $148.5 million. The trademark is being amortized on a straight-line basis over its useful life of 20 years. The customer relationship intangible is being amortized on an accelerated basis over its useful life of approximately 16
years. As a result, the Company anticipates a higher level of amortization in future periods as compared to historical periods. In addition, the Company acquired Blowfish Malibu on July 6, 2018. The allocation of the purchase price resulted in incremental intangible assets of $17.6 million, consisting of trademarks and customer relationships of $11.1 million and $6.5 million, respectively, and incremental goodwill of $5.0 million.
Amortization
expense related to intangible assets was $7.0 million in 2018, $4.1 million in 2017 and $3.7 million in 2016. The Company estimates $13.1 million of amortization expense related to intangible assets in 2019, $12.8 million in 2020, $12.7 million in 2021, $12.5 million in 2022 and $12.2 million in 2023.
Goodwill
is tested for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate it might be impaired, using either the qualitative assessment or a quantitative fair value-based test, as further discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. As a result of its annual goodwill impairment testing, the Company determined that the carrying value of the Allen Edmonds reporting unit exceeded its fair value and recorded $38.0 million in impairment charges during 2018. The fair value of the reporting unit was determined using a discounted cash flow analysis with a discount rate of 11%. The Company recorded no impairment charges in 2017
and 2016.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment as of the first day of the fourth quarter of each fiscal year unless events or circumstances indicate an interim test is required. The indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment reviews resulted in $60.0 million in impairment charges in 2018 associated with the Allen Edmonds trademark. The fair value of the Allen Edmonds trademark was determined using a discounted cash flow analysis with a discount rate of 12%.
The Company's total non-cash goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment
charges in 2018, reflected within the Brand Portfolio segment, were $98.0 million ($83.0 million on an after-tax basis, or $1.93 per diluted share). The impairment charges were attributable to a decline in projected revenues for Allen Edmonds as a result of the decision for the brand's pricing structure to be less promotional in the future. In addition, rising interest rates and less favorable operating results in 2018 contributed to the need for the impairment charges.
12. LONG-TERM AND SHORT-TERM FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
Credit Agreement
The
Company maintains a revolving credit facility for working capital needs. On December 18, 2014, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries (the “Loan Parties”) entered into a Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement ("the Former Credit Agreement"), which was further amended on July 20, 2015 to release all of the Company’s subsidiaries that were borrowers under or that guaranteed the Former Credit Agreement other than
Sidney Rich Associates, Inc. and BG Retail, LLC. Allen Edmonds and Vionic were joined to the Agreement as guarantors on December 13, 2016 and October 31, 2018, respectively. After giving effect to the joinders, the Company is the lead borrower, and Sidney Rich Associates, Inc., BG Retail, LLC, Allen Edmonds and Vionic are each co-borrowers and guarantors under the Former Credit Agreement. On January 18, 2019, the Loan Parties entered into a Third Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (as so amended, the "Credit Agreement") to extend the maturity date to January 18,
2024 and change the borrowing capacity under the Former Credit Agreement from an aggregate amount of up to $600.0 million to an aggregate amount of up
79
to $500.0 million, with the option to increase by up to $250.0 million. The Credit Amendment also reduces upfront and unused borrowing fees, provides for less restrictive covenants and offers more flexibility.
Borrowing availability under the Credit Agreement is limited to the lesser of the total commitments and the borrowing base ("Loan Cap"), which is based on stated
percentages of the sum of eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory and eligible credit card receivables, as defined, less applicable reserves. Under the Credit Agreement, the Loan Parties’ obligations are secured by a first-priority security interest in all accounts receivable, inventory and certain other collateral.
Interest on borrowings is at variable rates based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or the prime rate, as defined in the Credit Agreement, plus a spread. The interest rate and fees for letters of credit vary based upon the level of excess availability under the Credit Agreement. There is an unused line fee payable on the unused portion under the facility and a letter of credit fee payable on the outstanding face amount under letters of credit.
The
Credit Agreement limits the Company’s ability to create, incur, assume or permit to exist additional indebtedness and liens, make investments or specified payments, give guarantees, pay dividends, make capital expenditures and merge or acquire or sell assets. In addition, certain additional covenants would be triggered if excess availability were to fall below specified levels, including fixed charge coverage ratio requirements. Furthermore, if excess availability falls below the greater of 10.0% of the lesser of the Loan Cap and $40.0 million for three consecutive business days or an event of default occurs, the collateral agent may assume dominion and control over the Company’s cash (a “cash dominion event”)
until such event of default is cured or waived or the excess availability exceeds such amount for 30 consecutive days, provided that a cash dominion event shall be deemed continuing (even if an event of default is no longer continuing and/or excess availability exceeds the required amount for 30 consecutive business days) after a cash dominion event has occurred and been discontinued on two occasions in any 12-month period.
The Credit Agreement contains customary events of default, including, without limitation, payment defaults, breaches of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults to similar obligations, certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency, judgment defaults and the failure of any guaranty or security document supporting the agreement to be in full force
and effect. In addition, if the excess availability falls below the greater of (i) 10.0% of the lesser of the Loan Cap and (ii) $40.0 million, and the fixed charge coverage ratio is less than 1.0 to 1.0, the Company would be in default under the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement also contains certain other covenants and restrictions. The Company was in compliance with all covenants and restrictions under the Credit Agreement as of February 2, 2019.
The
maximum amount of borrowings under the Credit Agreement at the end of any month was $350.0 million and $260.0 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively. As discussed further in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company utilized the Credit Agreement in October 2018 to fund the Vionic acquisition. The average daily borrowings during the year were $103.2 million and $93.5 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively, and the weighted-average interest rates approximated 3.9%
and 2.5% in 2018 and 2017, respectively. At February 2, 2019, the Company had $335.0 million borrowings outstanding and $10.5 million in letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Agreement. Total additional borrowing availability was $154.5 million at February 2, 2019.
$200 Million Senior Notes
On
July 27, 2015, the Company issued $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.25% Senior Notes due 2023 (the "Senior Notes").
The Senior Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of the Company's subsidiaries that is a borrower or guarantor under the Credit Agreement. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable on February 15 and August 15 of each year. The Senior Notes will
mature on August 15, 2023. The Company may redeem all or a part of the Senior Notes at the redemption prices (expressed as a percentage of principal amount) set forth below plus accrued and unpaid interest, and Additional Interest (as defined in the Senior Notes indenture), if redeemed during the 12-month period beginning on August 15 of the years indicated below:
Year
Percentage
2019
103.125
%
2020
101.563
%
2021
and thereafter
100.000
%
If the Company experiences specific kinds of changes of control, it would be required to offer to purchase the Senior Notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and Additional Interest, if any, to, but not including, the date of repurchase.
80
The Senior Notes also contain certain
other covenants and restrictions that limit certain activities including, among other things, levels of indebtedness, payments of dividends, the guarantee or pledge of assets, certain investments, common stock repurchases, mergers and acquisitions and sales of assets. As of February 2, 2019, the Company was in compliance with all covenants and restrictions relating to the Senior Notes.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt
During 2018, the Company incurred a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $0.2 million on the early extinguishment of the Former Credit Agreement prior
to maturity.
13. LEASES
The Company leases all of its retail locations, a manufacturing facility, and certain office locations, distribution centers and equipment. The minimum lease terms for the Company’s retail stores generally range from five to 10 years. Approximately 45% of the retail store leases contain renewal options for varying periods. The term of the manufacturing facility
lease is eight years. The terms of the leases for office facilities and distribution centers range from 10 to 15 years with renewal options of five to 20 years.
At the time its retail facilities are initially leased, the Company often receives consideration from landlords for a portion of the cost of leasehold improvements necessary to open the store, which are recorded as a deferred rent obligation and amortized to income over the lease term as a reduction of rent expense. In addition to minimum rental payments, certain of the retail store leases require contingent
payments based on sales levels. The Company is also required to pay real estate taxes, maintenance and insurance which can vary year by year, and are therefore not included in the minimum rent payments below. A majority of the Company’s retail operating leases contain provisions that allow it to modify amounts payable under the lease or terminate the lease in certain circumstances, such as experiencing actual sales volume below a defined threshold and/or co-tenancy provisions associated with the facility.
The following is a summary of rent expense for operating leases:
($
thousands)
2018
2017
2016
Minimum rent
$
171,410
$
171,980
$
160,806
Contingent
rent
671
513
470
Sublease income
(428
)
(1,705
)
(1,665
)
Total
$
171,653
$
170,788
$
159,611
Future
minimum rent payments under noncancelable operating leases with an initial term of one year or more at February 2, 2019 were as follows:
($ thousands)
2019
$
173,891
2020
151,157
2021
125,629
2022
102,488
2023
84,036
Thereafter
212,774
Total
minimum operating lease payments (1)
$
849,975
(1) Minimum operating lease payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rental income of $0.5 million due in the future under noncancelable sublease agreements.
14. RISK MANAGEMENT AND DERIVATIVES
General
Risk Management
The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents and certain other financial instruments with various financial institutions. The financial institutions are located throughout the world and the Company’s policy is designed to limit exposure to any one institution or geographic region. The Company’s periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these financial institutions are considered in the Company’s investment strategy.
81
The
Company’s Brand Portfolio segment sells to national chains, online retailers, department stores, mass merchandisers, independent retailers and catalogs in the United States, Canada and approximately 70 other countries. Receivables arising from these sales are not collateralized. However, a portion is covered by documentary letters of credit. Credit risk is affected by conditions or occurrences within the economy and the retail industry. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers and historical trends.
Derivatives
In the normal course of business, the
Company’s financial results are impacted by currency rate movements in foreign-currency-denominated assets, liabilities and cash flows as it makes a portion of its purchases and sales in local currencies. The Company has established policies and business practices that are intended to mitigate a portion of the effect of these exposures. The Company uses derivative financial instruments, primarily forward contracts, to manage its currency exposures. These derivative financial instruments are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes. Derivatives entered into by the Company are designated
as cash flow hedges of forecasted foreign currency transactions.
Derivative financial instruments expose the Company to credit and market risk. The market risk associated with these instruments resulting from currency exchange movements is expected to offset the market risk of the underlying transactions being hedged. The Company does not believe there is a significant risk of loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparties associated with these instruments because these transactions are executed with major international financial institutions and have varying maturities through January 2020. Credit risk is managed through the continuous monitoring of exposures
to such counterparties.
The Company principally uses foreign currency forward contracts as cash flow hedges to offset a portion of the effects of exchange rate fluctuations. The Company’s cash flow exposures include anticipated foreign currency transactions, such as foreign currency denominated sales, costs, expenses and intercompany charges, as well as collections and payments.
The Company’s hedging strategy uses forward contracts
as cash flow hedging instruments, which are recorded in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The effective portion of gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of these hedge instruments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss ("OCL") and reclassified to earnings in the period that the hedged transaction is recognized in earnings.
As of February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, the Company had forward contracts
maturing at various dates through January 2020 and February 2019, respectively. The contract amounts in the following table represent the net notional amount of all purchase and sale contracts of a foreign currency.
U.S.
dollars (purchased by the Company’s Canadian division with Canadian dollars)
15,196
16,874
Chinese yuan
4,507
12,058
New
Taiwanese dollars
461
596
Other currencies
382
415
Total
financial instruments
$
33,929
$
51,166
The classification and fair values of derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments included within the consolidated balance sheets as of February 2, 2019 and February 3,
2018 are as follows:
During 2018 and 2017, the effect of derivative instruments in cash flow hedging relationships on the consolidated statements of earnings (loss) was as follows:
Loss Reclassified from Accumulated OCL into Earnings
(Loss) Gain Recognized in OCI on Derivatives
Gain
(Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCL into Earnings
Net sales
$
(55
)
$
(6
)
$
(25
)
$
30
Cost
of goods sold
(1,004
)
(58
)
1,144
171
Selling and administrative expenses
(822
)
(90
)
1,011
157
Interest
expense
—
—
(1
)
(1
)
All of the gains
and losses currently included within accumulated other comprehensive loss associated with the Company’s foreign exchange forward contracts are expected to be reclassified into net earnings within the next 12 months. Additional information related to the Company’s derivative financial instruments are disclosed within Note 1 and Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.
15. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair Value Hierarchy
Fair
value measurement disclosure requirements specify a hierarchy of valuation techniques based upon whether the inputs to those valuation techniques reflect assumptions other market participants would use based upon market data obtained from independent sources (“observable inputs”) or reflect the Company’s own assumptions of market participant valuation (“unobservable inputs”). In accordance with the fair value guidance, the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value are categorized into three levels based on the reliability of the inputs as follows:
•
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets that are
unadjusted and accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
•
Level 2 – Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or financial instruments for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; and
•
Level 3 – Prices or valuations that require inputs that
are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
In determining fair value, the Company uses valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible. The Company also considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value. Classification of the financial or non-financial asset or liability within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Measurement of Fair Value
The
Company measures fair value as an exit price, the price to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, using the procedures described below for all financial and non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value.
Money Market Funds
The Company has cash equivalents primarily consisting of short-term money market funds backed by U.S. Treasury securities. The primary objective of these investing activities is to preserve the Company's capital for the purpose of funding operations and it does not enter into money market funds for trading or speculative purposes. The fair value is based
on unadjusted quoted market prices for the funds in active markets with sufficient volume and frequency (Level 1).
83
Deferred Compensation Plan Assets and Liabilities
The Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) for the benefit of certain management employees. The investment funds offered to the participants generally correspond to the funds offered in the Company’s 401(k) plan, and the account balance fluctuates with the investment returns on those funds. The
Deferred Compensation Plan permits the deferral of up to 50% of base salary and 100% of compensation received under the Company’s annual incentive plan. The deferrals are held in a separate trust, which has been established by the Company to administer the Deferred Compensation Plan. The assets of the trust are subject to the claims of the Company’s creditors in the event that the Company becomes insolvent. Consequently, the trust qualifies as a grantor trust for income tax purposes (i.e., a “Rabbi Trust”). The liabilities of the Deferred Compensation
Plan are presented in other accrued expenses and the assets held by the trust are classified as trading securities within prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Changes in deferred compensation plan assets and liabilities are charged to selling and administrative expenses. The fair value is based on unadjusted quoted market prices for the funds in active markets with sufficient volume and frequency (Level 1).
Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors
Non-employee directors are eligible to participate in a deferred compensation plan with deferred amounts valued as if invested in the Company’s common stock through the use of phantom stock units (“PSUs”). Under the plan, each participating
director’s account is credited with the number of PSUs equal to the number of shares of the Company’s common stock that the participant could purchase or receive with the amount of the deferred compensation, based upon the average of the high and low prices of the Company’s common stock on the last trading day of the fiscal quarter when the cash compensation was earned. Dividend equivalents are paid on PSUs at the same rate as dividends on the Company’s common stock and are re-invested in additional PSUs at the next fiscal quarter-end. The liabilities of the plan are based on the fair value of the outstanding PSUs and are presented in other accrued expenses (current portion) or other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets. Gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of the PSUs are presented in selling and administrative expenses in the Company’s consolidated statements of earnings (loss). The fair value of each PSU is based on an unadjusted quoted market price for the Company’s common stock in an active market with sufficient volume and frequency on each measurement date (Level 1).
Restricted Stock Units for Non-Employee Directors
Under the Company’s incentive compensation plans, cash-equivalent restricted stock units (“RSUs”) of the
Company were previously granted at no cost to non-employee directors. The RSUs are subject to a vesting requirement (usually one year), earn dividend-equivalent units and are settled in cash on the date the director terminates service or such earlier date as a director may elect, subject to restrictions, based on the then current fair value of the Company’s common stock. The fair value of each RSU payable in cash is based on an unadjusted quoted market price for the Company’s common stock in an active market with sufficient volume and frequency on each measurement date (Level 1). Additional information related to RSUs for non-employee directors is disclosed in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
The Company uses derivative financial instruments, primarily foreign exchange contracts, to reduce its exposure to market risks from changes in foreign exchange rates. These foreign exchange contracts are measured at fair value using quoted forward foreign exchange prices from counterparties corroborated by market-based pricing (Level 2). Additional information related to the Company’s derivative financial instruments is disclosed in Note 1 and Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
Mandatory
Purchase Obligation
The Company recorded a mandatory purchase obligation of the noncontrolling interest in conjunction with the acquisition of Blowfish Malibu in July 2018. The fair value of the mandatory purchase obligation is based on the earnings formula specified in the Purchase Agreement (Level 3). Accretion of the mandatory purchase obligation and any fair value adjustments are recorded as interest expense. From the acquisition date of July 6, 2018 through February 2, 2019, an immaterial amount of accretion was recorded on the mandatory purchase obligation. The earnings projections and discount rate utilized in the estimate of the fair value of the mandatory purchase obligation require management
judgment and are the assumptions to which the fair value calculation is the most sensitive. Refer to further discussion of the mandatory purchase obligation in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
84
The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018. The Company
did not have any transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 during 2018 or 2017.
Non-qualified deferred compensation
plan liabilities
(6,445
)
(6,445
)
—
—
Deferred compensation plan liabilities for non-employee
directors
(2,289
)
(2,289
)
—
—
Restricted stock units for non-employee directors
(4,343
)
(4,343
)
—
—
Derivative
financial instruments, net
998
—
998
—
Impairment
Charges
The Company assesses the impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors the Company considers important that could trigger an impairment review include underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results, a significant change in the manner of the use of the asset or a negative industry or economic trend. When the Company determines that the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the aforementioned factors, impairment is measured based on a projected discounted cash flow method. Certain
factors, such as estimated store sales and expenses, used for this nonrecurring fair value measurement are considered Level 3 inputs as defined by FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement. Long-lived assets held and used with a carrying amount of $99.0 million, $112.5 million and $99.4 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, were assessed for indicators of impairment and written down to their fair value. This assessment resulted in the following impairment charges, by segment, which were included in selling and administrative expenses for the respective periods.
($
thousands)
2018
2017
2016
Long-Lived Asset Impairment Charges
Famous
Footwear
$
800
$
677
$
211
Brand Portfolio
2,865
3,098
1,375
Total
long-lived asset impairment charges
$
3,665
$
3,775
$
1,586
During
2016, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $7.0 million ($7.0 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.16 per diluted share) related to its cost method investment in a nonconsolidated affiliate. The impairment charge is included in restructuring and other special charges in the Company's consolidated statements of earnings (loss). Refer to Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
The Company performed its annual impairment tests of indefinite-lived intangible
assets, which involves estimating the fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). As a result of its annual impairment testing, the Company recorded $60.0 million in impairment charges in 2018 related to the Allen Edmonds trademark, as further discussed in Note 1 and Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements. The Company did not record any impairment charges on intangible assets during 2017 or 2016.
85
During
2018, the Company performed its annual impairment test of goodwill by completing an assessment at the reporting unit level, which involved estimating the fair value of its reporting units using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The quantitative and qualitative assessments performed in 2018 resulted in an impairment charge of $38.0 million. The quantitative and qualitative assessments performed in 2017 and 2016, respectively, resulted in no impairment charges. Refer to Note 1 and Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the goodwill impairment tests.
Fair Value of the Company’s Other Financial Instruments
The
fair values of cash and cash equivalents (excluding money market funds discussed above), receivables and trade accounts payable approximate their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s other financial instruments subject to fair value disclosures are as follows:
The
fair value of the borrowings under revolving credit agreement approximates its carrying value due to its short-term nature (Level 1). The fair value of the Company's long-term debt was based upon quoted prices in an inactive market as of the end of the respective periods (Level 2).
16. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Stock Repurchase Program
On August 25, 2011 and December 14, 2018,
the Board of Directors approved stock repurchase programs (“2011 Program” and "2018 Program", respectively) authorizing the repurchase of up to 2.5 million shares in each program of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The Company can use the repurchase programs to repurchase shares on the open market or in private transactions from time to time, depending on market conditions. The repurchase programs do not have an expiration date. Repurchases of common stock are limited under the Company’s debt agreements. During 2018, the Company
repurchased 1,223,500 shares under the 2011 Program. In total, 2.5 million shares have been repurchased under the 2011 Program and there are no additional shares authorized to be repurchased. In addition, during 2018, the Company repurchased 242,149 shares under the 2018 program. There are 2.3 million shares remaining that are authorized to be repurchased under the 2018 Program as of February 2, 2019.
Repurchases Related to Employee
Share-based Awards
During 2018, 2017 and 2016, employees tendered 145,357, 141,713 and 205,569 shares, respectively, related to certain share-based awards. These shares were tendered in satisfaction of the exercise price of stock options and/or to satisfy tax withholding amounts for non-qualified stock options, restricted stock and stock performance awards. Accordingly, these share repurchases are not considered a part of the Company’s publicly announced stock repurchase programs.
86
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss
The following table sets forth the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, by component for 2018, 2017 and 2016:
(1)
Amounts reclassified are included in other income, net. Refer to Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to pension and other postretirement benefits.
(2) Amounts reclassified are included in net sales, costs of goods sold, selling and administrative expenses and interest expense. Refer to Note 14 and Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to derivative financial instruments.
17. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The
Company has share-based incentive compensation plans under which certain officers, employees and members of the Board of Directors are participants and may be granted restricted stock, stock performance awards, restricted stock units and stock options.
ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, and ASC 505, Equity, require companies to recognize compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of all share-based payments granted to employees over the requisite service period for each award. In certain limited circumstances, the Company’s incentive compensation plan provides for accelerated vesting of the awards, such as in the event of a change in control, qualified retirement, death or
disability. The Company has a policy of issuing treasury shares in satisfaction of share-based awards.
87
Share-based compensation expense of $13.8 million, $11.3 million and $7.7 million was recognized in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, as a component of selling and administrative expenses. The following table details the share-based compensation expense by plan for 2018,
2017 and 2016:
($ thousands)
2018
2017
2016
Expense
for share-based compensation plans, net of forfeitures:
Restricted stock
$
10,925
$
7,657
$
5,858
Stock
performance awards
1,741
3,508
1,829
Restricted stock units
1,091
66
—
Stock
options
48
67
38
Total share-based compensation expense
$
13,805
$
11,298
$
7,725
In
addition to the share-based compensation expense above, the Company recognized cash-based expense related to performance share units and cash awards granted under the performance share plans. In 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized $0.1 million and $2.9 million, respectively, in expense for cash-based awards under the performance share plans. During the first quarter of 2017, the Company's remaining performance share awards granted in units vested and were settled in cash at fair value.
The
Company issued 320,522, 293,470 and 203,066 shares of common stock in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for restricted stock grants, stock performance awards issued to employees, stock options exercised and common and restricted stock grants issued to non-employee directors, net of forfeitures and shares withheld to satisfy the tax withholding requirement.
The Company recognized excess tax benefits related to restricted stock vestings and dividends, performance share award vestings and stock options exercised of $0.3
million, $1.3 million and $2.3 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. In accordance with ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which the Company adopted on a prospective basis during the first quarter of 2017, the Company recognized these excess tax benefits within the income tax provision in 2017 and 2018, as further discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. The
excess tax benefits recognized in 2016 were reflected as an increase to additional paid-in capital.
Restricted Stock
Under the Company’s incentive compensation plans, restricted stock of the Company may be granted at no cost to certain officers, key employees and directors. Plan participants are entitled to cash dividends and voting rights for their respective shares. The restricted stock awards limit the sale or transfer of these shares during the requisite service period. Expense for restricted stock grants is recognized on a straight-line basis separately for each vesting portion of the stock award based upon fair value
of the award on the date of grant. The fair value of the restricted stock grants is the quoted market price for the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.
88
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for 2018, 2017 and 2016:
Of the 427,083 restricted shares granted during 2018, 3,642 shares have a cliff-vesting term of one year, 413,941 shares have a graded-vesting term of three
years, and 9,500 shares have a cliff-vesting term of four years. Of the 392,812 restricted shares granted during 2017, 4,492 shares have a cliff-vesting term of one year, 12,000 shares have a graded-vesting term of four years and 376,320 shares have a cliff-vesting term of four years. Of the 402,100 restricted shares granted during 2016, 45,000 shares have a graded-vesting term of four
years and 357,100 shares have a cliff-vesting term of four years.
The total grant date fair value of restricted stock awards vested during the years ended February 2, 2019, February 3, 2018 and January 28, 2017, was $8.2 million, $4.7 million and $4.0 million, respectively. As of February 2, 2019,
the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock grants was $16.4 million, which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of 1.9 years.
Performance Share Awards
Under the Company’s incentive compensation plans, common stock or cash may be awarded at the end of the performance period at no cost to certain officers and key employees if certain financial goals are met. Under the plan, employees are granted performance share awards at a target number of shares or units, which vest over a three-year service period. At the end of the vesting
period, the employee will have earned an amount of shares between 0% and 200% of the targeted award, depending on the achievement of specified financial goals for the service period. If the awards are granted in units, the employee will be given an amount of cash ranging from 0% to 200% of the equivalent market value of the targeted award.
Expense for performance share awards is recognized based upon the fair value of the awards on the date of grant and the anticipated number of shares or cash to be awarded on a straight-line basis for each vesting portion of the share award. The fair value of the performance share awards granted in units is the unadjusted quoted market price for the
Company’s common stock on the date of grant. During the first quarter of 2017, the Company's remaining performance share awards granted in units vested and were settled in cash at fair value.
89
The following table summarizes performance share award activity for 2018, 2017 and 2016:
Number
of Nonvested Performance Share Awards at Target Level
Number of Nonvested Performance Share Awards at Maximum Level
As of February 2, 2019, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested performance share awards was $3.9
million, which will be recognized over the weighted-average remaining service period of 1.6 years.
Stock Options
Stock options are granted to employees at exercise prices equal to the quoted market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant. Stock options generally vest over four years and have a term of 10 years. Compensation cost for all stock options is recognized over the requisite service period for each award. No dividends are paid on unexercised options. Expense for stock options is recognized on a straight-line basis separately for each vesting portion of the stock option award. The
Company granted no stock options during 2018, 2017 or 2016.
The following table summarizes stock option activity for 2018:
As of February 2, 2019, there are 16,667 of nonvested options with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $12.81 per share.
90
Restricted
Stock Units for Non-Employee Directors
Equity-based grants may be made to non-employee directors in the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) payable in cash or common stock at no cost to the non-employee director. The RSUs are subject to a vesting requirement (usually one year), earn dividend equivalent units and are payable in cash or common stock on the date the director terminates service or such earlier date as a director may elect, subject to restrictions, based on the then current fair value of the Company’s common stock. Dividend equivalents are paid on outstanding RSUs at the same rate as dividends on the Company’s common stock, are automatically re-invested in additional RSUs and vest immediately as of the payment
date for the dividend. Expense related to the initial grant of RSUs is recognized ratably over the vesting period based upon the fair value of the RSUs. The RSUs payable in cash are remeasured at the end of each period. Expense for the dividend equivalents is recognized at fair value immediately. Gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of the RSUs payable in cash subsequent to the vesting period and through the settlement date are reported in the Company’s consolidated statements of earnings (loss). During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company converted 210,302 of its director RSUs payable in cash with a value of $6.3 million to RSUs payable in common stock. Refer to
Note 6 and Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding the deferred compensation plan for non-employee directors.
The following table summarizes restricted stock unit activity for the year ended February 2, 2019:
Accrued
RSUs include all fully vested awards and a pro-rata portion of nonvested awards based on the elapsed portion of the vesting period.
(2)
Total number of RSUs as of February 2, 2019 includes 245,463 RSUs payable in shares and 174,594 RSUs payable in cash.
(3)
Granted RSUs include 3,228 RSUs resulting from dividend equivalents paid on outstanding RSUs, of which 2,914 related to outstanding vested RSUs and 314 to outstanding nonvested RSUs.
The following table summarizes RSUs granted, vested and settled during 2018,
2017 and 2016:
($ thousands, except per unit amounts)
2018
2017
2016
Weighted-average
grant date fair value of RSUs granted (1)
$
34.23
$
27.93
$
21.95
Fair
value of RSUs vested
$
1,340
$
1,349
$
1,086
RSUs settled
5,914
10,356
52,524
(1)
Includes
dividend equivalents granted on outstanding RSUs, which vest immediately.
The following table details the RSU compensation expense and the related income tax benefit for 2018, 2017 and 2016:
($ thousands)
2018
2017
2016
Compensation
expense
$
287
$
1,645
$
2,459
Income tax benefit
(74
)
(620
)
(956
)
Compensation
expense, net of income tax benefit
$
213
$
1,025
$
1,503
The aggregate
fair value of RSUs outstanding and currently vested at February 2, 2019 is $12.4 million and $11.3 million, respectively. The liabilities associated with the accrued RSUs totaled $4.4 million and $4.3 million as of February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, respectively.
91
18. COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
Environmental Remediation
Prior operations included numerous manufacturing and other facilities for which the Company may have responsibility under various environmental laws for the remediation of conditions that may be identified in the future. The Company is involved in environmental remediation and ongoing compliance activities at several sites and has been notified that it is or may be a potentially responsible party at several other sites.
Redfield
The
Company is remediating, under the oversight of Colorado authorities, the groundwater and indoor air at its owned facility in Colorado (the “Redfield site” or, when referring to remediation activities at or under the facility, the “on-site remediation”) and residential neighborhoods adjacent to and near the property (the “off-site remediation”) that have been affected by solvents previously used at the facility. The on-site remediation calls for the operation of a pump and treat system (which prevents migration of contaminated groundwater off the property) as the final remedy for the site, subject to monitoring and periodic review of the on-site conditions and other remedial technologies that may be developed in the future. In 2016, the Company submitted a revised plan to address on-site conditions, including direct treatment of source areas, and received approval
from the oversight authorities to begin implementing the revised plan.
As the treatment of the on-site source areas progresses, the Company expects to convert the pump and treat system to a passive treatment barrier system. Off-site groundwater concentrations have been reducing over time since installation of the pump and treat system in 2000 and injection of clean water beginning in 2003. However, localized areas of contaminated bedrock just beyond the property line continue to impact off-site groundwater. The modified workplan for addressing this condition includes converting the off-site bioremediation system into a monitoring well network and employing different remediation methods in these recalcitrant areas. In accordance with the workplan, a pilot test was conducted of certain groundwater
remediation methods and the results of that test were used to develop more detailed plans for remedial activities in the off-site areas, which were approved by the authorities and are being implemented in a phased manner. The results of groundwater monitoring are being used to evaluate the effectiveness of these activities. The Company continues to implement the expanded remedy workplan that was approved by the oversight authorities in 2015. Based on the progress of the direct remedial action of on-site conditions, the Company has submitted a request to the oversight authorities for permission to convert the perimeter pump and treat active remediation system to a passive one.
The cumulative expenditures for both
on-site and off-site remediation through February 2, 2019 were $30.5 million. The Company has recovered a portion of these expenditures from insurers and other third parties. The reserve for the anticipated future remediation activities at February 2, 2019 is $9.7 million, of which $8.9 million is recorded within other liabilities and $0.8 million is recorded within other accrued expenses. Of the total $9.7 million reserve, $5.0 million
is for off-site remediation and $4.7 million is for on-site remediation. The liability for the on-site remediation was discounted at 4.8%. On an undiscounted basis, the on-site remediation liability would be $14.0 million as of February 2, 2019. The Company expects to spend approximately $0.5 million in the next year, $0.1 million in each of the following four years and $13.1 million in the aggregate thereafter related to the on-site remediation.
Other
Various
federal and state authorities have identified the Company as a potentially responsible party for remediation at certain other sites. However, the Company does not currently believe that its liability for such sites, if any, would be material.
The Company continues to evaluate its estimated costs in conjunction with its environmental consultants and records its best estimate of such liabilities. However, future actions and the associated costs are subject to oversight and approval of various governmental authorities. Accordingly, the ultimate costs may vary, and it is possible costs may exceed the recorded amounts.
Litigation
The
Company is involved in legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the outcome of such ordinary course of business proceedings and litigation currently pending is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position. Legal costs associated with litigation are generally expensed as incurred.
The Company's Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally and jointly and severally guaranteed by all of its existing and future subsidiaries that are guarantors under the Credit Agreement, as further discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements. The following table presents the condensed consolidating financial information for each of Caleres, Inc. (“Parent”), the Guarantors, and subsidiaries of the Parent that are not Guarantors (the “Non-Guarantors”),
together with consolidating eliminations, as of and for the periods indicated. Guarantors are 100% owned by the Parent. On December 13, 2016, Allen Edmonds was joined to the Credit Agreement as a guarantor and on October 31, 2018, Vionic was joined to the Credit Agreement as a guarantor. After giving effect to the joinders, the Company is the lead borrower, and Sidney Rich Associates, Inc., BG Retail, LLC, Allen Edmonds and Vionic are each co-borrowers and guarantors under the Credit Agreement.
The condensed consolidating financial statements have been prepared using the equity method of accounting in accordance with the requirements for presentation
of such information. Management believes that the information, presented in lieu of complete financial statements for each of the Guarantors, provides meaningful information to allow investors to determine the nature of the assets held by, and operations and cash flows of, each of the consolidated groups.
Issuance
of common stock under share-based plans, net
(4,188
)
—
—
—
(4,188
)
Excess
tax benefit related to share-based plans
2,251
—
—
—
2,251
Intercompany
financing
126,858
(20,922
)
(105,936
)
—
—
Net
cash provided by (used for) financing activities
199,678
(20,922
)
(105,936
)
—
72,820
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
—
—
233
—
233
(Decrease)
increase in cash and cash equivalents
(7,001
)
9,029
(64,847
)
—
(62,819
)
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
31,000
—
87,151
—
118,151
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of year
$
23,999
$
9,029
$
22,304
$
—
$
55,332
100
20. QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited)
Quarterly financial results (unaudited) for 2018 and 2017 are as follows:
Quarters
First
Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
($ thousands, except per share amounts)
(13 weeks)
(13
weeks)
(13 weeks)
(13 Weeks)
2018
Net
sales
$
632,142
$
706,612
$
775,829
$
720,263
Gross
profit
274,921
293,101
310,610
277,712
Net earnings (1)
17,180
23,611
29,155
(75,427
)
Net
earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc. (1)
17,212
23,646
29,153
(75,452
)
Per share of common stock:
Basic
earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders (2)
0.40
0.55
0.68
(1.83
)
Diluted
earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders (2)
0.40
0.55
0.67
(1.83
)
Dividends
paid
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.07
Market value:
High
36.00
37.06
41.09
37.82
Low
27.10
32.18
31.84
26.63
(1) The
fourth quarter of 2018 reflects impairment of goodwill and intangible assets of $83.0 million on an after-tax basis, as further described in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the impact of amortization of the inventory fair value adjustments required for purchase accounting of $6.1 million on an after-tax basis, as further described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, and several restructuring and other charges totaling $4.7 million, on an after-tax basis, as further described in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.
(2) EPS for the quarters may not sum to the annual amount as each period is computed on a discrete period basis.
Quarters
First
Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
($ thousands, except per share amounts)
(13 weeks)
(13
weeks)
(13 weeks)
(14 Weeks)
2017
Net
sales
$
631,509
$
676,954
$
774,656
$
702,465
Gross
profit
270,908
287,461
316,885
293,395
Net earnings (loss) (1)
14,884
17,674
34,373
20,301
Net
earnings (loss) attributable to Caleres, Inc. (1)
14,902
17,595
34,387
20,316
Per share of common
stock:
Basic earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders (2)
0.35
0.41
0.80
0.47
Diluted
earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders (2)
0.35
0.41
0.80
0.47
Dividends
paid
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.07
Market value:
High
32.83
29.11
31.27
34.34
Low
24.86
24.45
22.39
26.54
(1) The
first and second quarters of 2017 reflect the impact of amortization of the inventory fair value adjustment required for purchase accounting of $1.9 million and $1.1 million, respectively, on an after-tax basis, as further described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements and several restructuring and other charges totaling$0.7 million and $1.9 million, respectively, on an after-tax basis, as further described in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements. The fourth quarter of 2017 reflects restructuring charges totaling $0.6 million, on an after-tax basis, as further described in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements and the benefit of income tax reform of $0.3 million,
as further described in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
(2) EPS for the quarters may not sum to the annual amount as each period is computed on a discrete period basis.
Discounts and allowances granted to wholesale customers of the Brand Portfolio segment.
(C)
Adjustment upon disposal of related inventories.
(D)
Reductions to the valuation allowances for the net operating loss carryforwards for certain states based on the
Company’s expectations for utilization of net operating loss carryforwards. In addition, in 2017, the valuation allowances related to the impairment of the investment in a nonconsolidated affiliate and capital loss carryforwards were reduced, reflecting the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
(E) Established through purchase accounting related to the Vionic acquisition.
(F) Established through purchase accounting related to the Allen Edmonds acquisition.
ITEM
9
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
It is the Chief Executive Officer’s and Chief Financial Officer’s ultimate responsibility to ensure we maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under
102
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our disclosure controls and procedures
include mandatory communication of material events; automated accounting processing and reporting; management review of monthly, quarterly and annual results; an established system of internal controls; and internal control reviews by our internal auditors.
A control system, no matter how well-conceived or operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Furthermore, the design of a control system must reflect the fact there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and
breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to errors or fraud may occur and not be detected. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide a reasonable level of assurance that their objectives are achieved. As of February 2, 2019,
management of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon and as of the date of that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During 2018, we acquired Blowfish Malibu and Vionic, as further discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. As a result of these acquisitions, we are in the
process of reviewing the internal control structures of Blowfish Malibu and Vionic and, if necessary, will make appropriate changes as we incorporate our internal controls into the acquired businesses. Based on the evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that there have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors during the quarter ended February 2, 2019, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM
9B
OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM
10
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information regarding Directors of the Company is set forth under the caption Proposal 1 – Election of Directors in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 30, 2019, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding Section 16, Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance, is set forth under the caption Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 30, 2019, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information
regarding the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee financial expert is set forth under the caption Board Meetings and Committees in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 30, 2019, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
103
Information regarding the Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct, and Code of Ethics is set forth under the caption Corporate Governance in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to
be held May 30, 2019, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information regarding Executive Compensation is set forth under the captions Compensation
Discussion and Analysis, Executive Compensation, and Compensation of Non-Employee Directors in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 30, 2019, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding the Compensation Committee Report is set forth under the caption Compensation Committee Report in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 30, 2019, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information
regarding Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation is set forth under the caption Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 30, 2019, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM
12
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information regarding Company Stock Ownership by Directors, Officers and Principal Holders of Our Stock is set forth under the caption Stock Ownership by Directors, Executive Officers and 5% Shareholders in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 30, 2019, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The
following table sets forth aggregate information regarding the Company’s equity compensation plans as of February 2, 2019:
Number
of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Plan
Category
(a)
(b)
(c)
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
958,333
(1)
$
18.01
(1)
3,981,281
(2)
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders
—
—
—
Total
958,333
$
18.01
3,981,281
(1)
Column
(a) includes 42,667 outstanding (vested and nonvested) stock options and 915,666 performance share units payable in stock, which reflects the maximum number of shares to be issued under the performance share plans. The target number of shares to be issued under the plans is 457,833. Performance share awards were disregarded for purposes of computing the weighted-average exercise price in column (b). This table excludes independent directors' deferred compensation units and restricted stock units payable in cash.
(2)
Represents our remaining shares available for award grants based upon the provisions of the plans, which reflect our practice to reserve shares for outstanding awards. The number of securities available for grant has been reduced for stock option grants and performance share awards payable in stock. Performance share
awards are reserved based on the maximum payout level.
Information regarding share-based plans is set forth in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements and is hereby incorporated by reference.
ITEM 13
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
Information regarding Certain Relationships and Related Transactions is set forth under the caption Related Party Transactions in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 30, 2019, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
104
Information regarding Director Independence is set forth under the caption Director Independence in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting
of Shareholders to be held May 30, 2019, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Information regarding our Principal Accounting Fees and Services is set forth
under the caption Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accountants in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 30, 2019, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM
15
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)
(1) and (2) The list of financial statements and Financial Statement Schedules required by this item is included in the Index under Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. All other schedules specified under Regulation S-X have been omitted because they are not applicable, because they are not required or because the information
required is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(3) Exhibits
Certain instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt securities of the Company are omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, and the Company hereby undertakes to furnish to the SEC, upon request, copies of any such instruments.
See
Item 15(a)(3) above. On request, copies of any exhibit will be furnished to shareholders upon payment of the Company’s reasonable expenses incurred in furnishing such exhibits.
(c)
Financial Statement Schedules:
See Item 8 above.
* Denotes management contract or compensatory plan arrangements.
† Denotes exhibit is filed with this Form 10-K.
107
ITEM
16
FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
108
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Know all men by these presents, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Diane M. Sullivan and Kenneth
H. Hannah his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has
been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant, on the dates and in the capacities indicated.