Document/ExhibitDescriptionPagesSize 1: 10-K Annual Report HTML 2.27M
2: EX-4.1 Instrument Defining the Rights of Security Holders HTML 33K
3: EX-10.9 Material Contract HTML 29K
4: EX-21 Subsidiaries List HTML 29K
5: EX-23.1 Consent of Expert or Counsel HTML 27K
6: EX-31.1 Certification -- §302 - SOA'02 HTML 31K
7: EX-31.2 Certification -- §302 - SOA'02 HTML 31K
8: EX-32.1 Certification -- §906 - SOA'02 HTML 28K
9: EX-32.2 Certification -- §906 - SOA'02 HTML 29K
16: R1 Cover Page HTML 92K
17: R2 Consolidated Statements of Financial Position HTML 136K
18: R3 Consolidated Statements of Financial Position HTML 53K
(Parenthetical)
19: R4 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income HTML 133K
20: R5 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity HTML 70K
21: R6 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows HTML 132K
22: R7 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Supplemental HTML 40K
Noncash Investing Activities
23: R8 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 141K
24: R9 Investments HTML 255K
25: R10 Fair Value Measurements HTML 141K
26: R11 Policy Liabilities and Short Duration Contracts HTML 97K
27: R12 Reinsurance HTML 56K
28: R13 Stockholders' Equity and Restrictions HTML 87K
29: R14 Commitment and Contingencies HTML 49K
30: R15 Segment and Other Operating Information HTML 168K
31: R16 Income Taxes HTML 115K
32: R17 Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) HTML 62K
33: R18 Stock Compensation HTML 51K
34: R19 Benefit Plans HTML 31K
35: R20 Related Party Transactions HTML 35K
36: R21 Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited) HTML 57K
37: R22 Subsequent Events HTML 33K
38: R23 Schedule II HTML 127K
39: R24 Schedule III HTML 46K
40: R25 Schedule IV HTML 72K
41: R26 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 178K
(Policies)
42: R27 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 95K
Financial Statements (Tables)
43: R28 Investments (Tables) HTML 268K
44: R29 Fair Value Measurements (Tables) HTML 134K
45: R30 Policy Liabilities and Short Duration Contracts HTML 102K
(Tables)
46: R31 Reinsurance (Tables) HTML 52K
47: R32 Stockholders' Equity and Restrictions (Tables) HTML 91K
48: R33 Commitments and Contingencies (Tables) HTML 42K
49: R34 Segment and Other Operating Information (Tables) HTML 167K
50: R35 Income Taxes (Tables) HTML 114K
51: R36 Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Tables) HTML 62K
52: R37 Stock Compensation (Tables) HTML 49K
53: R38 Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited) HTML 58K
(Tables)
54: R39 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 28K
Financial Statements (Details)
55: R40 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 90K
Deferred Acquisition Costs and Cost of Customer
Relationships Acquired (Details)
56: R41 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Cost of HTML 64K
Customer Relationships Acquired (Details)
57: R42 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 33K
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (Details)
58: R43 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 52K
Property and Equipment (Details)
59: R44 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Future HTML 31K
Policy Benefits and Expenses (Details)
60: R45 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 43K
Participating Policies (Details)
61: R46 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Premium HTML 29K
Revenue & Related Expenses (Details)
62: R47 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 28K
Earnings Per Share (Details)
63: R48 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 41K
Accounting Pronouncement (Details)
64: R49 Investments Cash, Cash Equivalent and Investments HTML 59K
(Details)
65: R50 Investments Gross Unrealized Gains and Losses HTML 74K
(Details)
66: R51 Investments Equity Securities (Details) HTML 39K
67: R52 Investments Unrealized Losses Less Than and HTML 99K
Greater Than 12 Months (Details)
68: R53 Investments Maturity Distribution of Debt HTML 56K
Securities (Details)
69: R54 Investments Net Investment Income (Details) HTML 46K
70: R55 Investments Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments HTML 84K
(Details)
71: R56 Fair Value Measurements (Details) HTML 138K
72: R57 Fair Value Measurements Other Long-Term HTML 55K
Investments (Details)
73: R58 Fair Value Measurements Financial Instruments not HTML 77K
Carried at Fair Value (Details)
74: R59 Policy Liabilities and Short Duration Contracts HTML 129K
Policy Liabilities (Details)
75: R60 Reinsurance (Details) HTML 80K
76: R61 Stockholders' Equity and Restrictions Change in HTML 38K
Common Shares (Details)
77: R62 Stockholders' Equity and Restrictions Earnings Per HTML 65K
Share (Details)
78: R63 Stockholders' Equity and Restrictions (Details) HTML 57K
79: R64 Commitments and Contingencies (Details) HTML 52K
80: R65 Commitments and Contingencies Lease Commitments HTML 57K
(Details)
81: R66 Segment and Other Operating Information (Details) HTML 173K
82: R67 Income Taxes (Details) HTML 45K
83: R68 Income Taxes Details (Details) HTML 28K
84: R69 Income Taxes Reconciliation of Expected Federal HTML 92K
Tax Expense to Actual (Details)
85: R70 Income Taxes Components of Income Tax Expense HTML 38K
(Details)
86: R71 Income Taxes Deferred Tax Assets and Deferred Tax HTML 62K
Liabilities (Details)
87: R72 Income Taxes Changes in Net Deferred Tax Liability HTML 40K
(Details)
88: R73 Income Taxes Unrecognized Tax Benefits (Details) HTML 48K
89: R74 Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Details) HTML 85K
90: R75 Stock Compensation (Details) HTML 74K
91: R76 Benefit Plans (Details) HTML 34K
92: R77 Related Party Transactions (Details) HTML 37K
93: R78 Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited) HTML 68K
(Details)
94: R79 Subsequent Events (Details) HTML 30K
95: R80 Schedule II - Statement of Operations and HTML 100K
Comprehensive Income (Details)
96: R81 Schedule II - Statement of Cash Flows (Details) HTML 83K
97: R82 Schedule II - Statement of Cash Flows - HTML 125K
Supplemental Disclosures (Details)
98: R83 Schedule III (Details) HTML 43K
99: R84 Schedule IV (Details) HTML 62K
100: R9999 Uncategorized Items - cia-20201231.htm HTML 40K
102: XML IDEA XML File -- Filing Summary XML 186K
15: XML XBRL Instance -- cia-20201231_htm XML 4.99M
101: EXCEL IDEA Workbook of Financial Reports XLSX 169K
11: EX-101.CAL XBRL Calculations -- cia-20201231_cal XML 320K
12: EX-101.DEF XBRL Definitions -- cia-20201231_def XML 1.08M
13: EX-101.LAB XBRL Labels -- cia-20201231_lab XML 2.46M
14: EX-101.PRE XBRL Presentations -- cia-20201231_pre XML 1.54M
10: EX-101.SCH XBRL Schema -- cia-20201231 XSD 237K
103: JSON XBRL Instance as JSON Data -- MetaLinks 541± 843K
104: ZIP XBRL Zipped Folder -- 0000024090-21-000012-xbrl Zip 873K
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code(i512) i837-7100
Securities registered pursuant
to Section 12(b) of the Act
iClass A Common Stock
iCIA
iNew
York Stock Exchange
(Title of each class)
(Trading symbol(s))
(Name of each exchange on which registered)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act
None
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐ Yes ☒ iNo
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐ Yes ☒ iNo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ iYes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ☒ iYes ☐
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer,""accelerated filer,""smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large
accelerated filer
☐
iAccelerated filer
☒
Non-accelerated filer
☐
Smaller reporting company
i☐
Emerging
growth company
i☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether
the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. i☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). i☐ Yes ☒ No
As of June 30, 2020, the aggregate market value of the Class A common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $i294,118,656.
Number
of shares of common stock outstanding as of March 5, 2021.
Part III of this Report incorporates by reference certain portions of the definitive proxy materials to be delivered to stockholders in connection with the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the "2021 Proxy Statement"). The 2021 Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that involve risks and uncertainties. Many of the forward-looking statements are located in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Forward-looking
statements provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. Forward-looking statements can also be identified by words such as “future,”“anticipates,”“believes,”“estimates,”“expects,”“intends,”“plans,”“predicts,”“will,”“would,”“could,”“can,”“may,” and similar terms. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and the Company’s actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K under the heading “Risk Factors”. The
Company assumes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason, except as required by law. Currently, some of the most significant factors that could cause our actual results to differ significantly from our forward-looking statements are those relating to the adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, including:
•Securities market disruption or volatility and related effects such as decreased economic activity that affect our investment portfolio;
•Decreased premium revenue and cash flow from disruption to our distribution channel of independent agents and consultants, customer self-isolation, travel limitations, business restrictions and decreased economic activity; and
•An
unusually high level of claims, lapses or surrenders in our insurance operations, which could affect our liquidity and cash flow.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, including the Company, that file electronically with the SEC. The public can obtain any documents that the Company files with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. We also make available, free of charge, through our Internet website
(http://www.citizensinc.com), our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Section 16 Reports filed by officers and directors, news releases, and, if applicable, amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such reports with, or furnish such reports to, the SEC. We are not including any of the information contained on our website as part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
SUMMARY
OF RISK FACTORS
The following is a summary of the material risks and uncertainties we face. The summary below is not exhaustive and is qualified by reference to the full set of risk factors set forth in Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors.
•A substantial portion of our revenue is generated from sales of our insurance products in foreign countries. In many of these countries, we have not registered to do business and our products have not been approved by a governmental authority. This could cause us to have to cease doing business in certain foreign markets or risk fines or other penalties. Changes in the application, interpretation or enforcement
of foreign insurance laws that impact our business could also negatively affect our financial position or results of operations.
•Our overall financial performance depends primarily upon the pricing of our insurance products and the accuracy of our pricing assumptions. Actual experience that differs materially from these assumptions, such as increases in policy surrenders, lapses or withdrawals, or increased claims, could increase our costs and negatively affect our liquidity.
•The Company's financial condition, liquidity and results of operations largely depend on the Company's ability to underwrite and set premiums accurately for the risks it faces.
•Management of our claims handling process, including awareness of fraudulent claims, is critical to our business, as mismanagement or payment of fraudulent claims could materially increase our benefit expenses.
•The prolonged impact
of COVID-19 could materially affect various aspects of our business.
•We distribute our products through independent consultants and marketing agencies with whom we have contractual relationships. We have less control over these consultants and agencies than we would have over employee agents. Additionally, we depend on these independent consultants and agencies to help us develop and maintain relationships with our policyholders. Failure to attract and retain our independent consultants could negatively impact our premium revenues and increase benefit expenses due to increased surrenders and lapses.
•Citizens is a holding company that has minimal operations of its own. Citizens depends on cash flow from its subsidiaries to be able to meet
most of its working capital needs.
•The insurance industry is highly regulated and imposes capital and surplus requirements upon our operating subsidiaries. This could affect their ability to provide cash for Citizens or could cause Citizens to have to make additional capital contributions to its operating subsidiaries.
•A significant portion of our revenues is generated by investment income, which is directly impacted by global and U.S. market conditions. Our investment return, or yield, on invested assets is an important element of the Company’s earnings since insurance
products are priced with the assumption that premiums received can be invested for a period of time before benefits are paid.
•The low interest rate environment continues to limit increases in profit margins for insurers, including us. Low interest rates negatively affect our margin for products where we pay guaranteed interest rates to policyholders. We may have to discontinue such products in a sustained low interest rate environment.
•Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation give the holders of the Class B common stock of the Company the exclusive right to elect a simple majority of the members of the Board. Historically, the holder of the Class B
common stock has controlled our Company.We have entered into an agreement with the holder of 100% of the outstanding Class B common stock to purchase all of the outstanding Class B common stock.Upon consummation of the purchase, the Class B common stock will be considered authorized, but unissued.If the Company decided to sell the Class B common stock to raise capital and an acquirer was able to obtain regulatory approval to purchase the Class B common stock, the holder of such reissued shares would gain control of the Company.
Any
of these factors, in whole or in part, could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results and stock price.
Citizens, Inc. ("Citizens" or the "Company") is an insurance holding company incorporated in Colorado serving the life insurance needs of individuals in the United States since 1969 and internationally since 1975. Through our insurance subsidiaries,
we provide insurance benefits to residents in 31 U.S. states and more than 75 different countries. We pursue a strategy of offering traditional insurance products in niche markets where we believe we are able to achieve competitive advantages. We had approximately $1.8 billion of assets at December 31, 2020 and approximately $4.1 billion of insurance in force. We operate in two business segments:
•Life Insurance segment - U.S. dollar-denominated ordinary whole life insurance and endowment policies predominantly sold to non-U.S. residents, located principally in Latin America and the Pacific Rim, sold through independent consultants in various countries; and
•Home Service Insurance segment - final expense life insurance and limited liability
property insurance policies marketed to middle- and lower-income households in Louisiana, Mississippi and Arkansas, and sold through independent agents and through funeral homes.
As an insurance provider, we collect premiums on an ongoing basis from our policyholders and invest the majority of the premiums to pay future benefits, including claims, surrenders and policyholder dividends. Accordingly, the Company derives its revenues principally from: (1) life insurance premiums earned for insurance coverages provided to insureds; and (2) net investment income. In addition to paying and reserving for insurance benefits that we pay to our policyholders, our expenses consist primarily of the costs of selling our insurance products (e.g., commissions, underwriting, marketing expenses), operating expenses and
income taxes.
Because collection of premiums is the primary source of our revenues, our overall financial performance depends primarily upon the pricing of our insurance products and the accuracy of our pricing assumptions. The Company seeks to price our insurance policies such that insurance premiums and future net investment income earned on premiums received will cover our expenses and the ultimate cost of paying claims reported on the policies and provide for a profit margin. Pricing adequacy depends on a number of factors, including proper evaluation of underwriting risks, the ability to project future losses based on historical loss experience adjusted for known trends, the Company’s response to competitors, the ability
to obtain regulatory approval for rate changes if applicable, expectations about regulatory and legal developments and expense levels.
In order to manage the risks related to pricing, we employ medical underwriting procedures to assess and quantify risks before we issue policies. Insurance applications are reviewed to determine eligibility based on underwriting guidelines we establish, as well as to determine the applicable premium. We periodically review our underwriting requirements and may make changes as needed.
We also seek to manage pricing risk through:
•favorable risk selection and diversification;
•management of claims;
•use
of reinsurance;
•careful monitoring of our mortality and morbidity experience; and
•management of our expense ratio.
In addition to insurance premiums, the investment return, or yield, on invested assets is an important element of the Company’s earnings since insurance products are priced with the assumption that premiums received can be invested for a period of time before benefits are paid. Most of the Company’s invested assets have been held in available for sale ("AFS") fixed maturity securities, primarily in asset classes of corporate bonds, municipal bonds, and government
obligation bonds. The interest rate environment has a significant impact on the determination of insurance contract liabilities, our investment rates and yields, and our asset/liability management. The profitability
of
fixed annuities, riders and other "spread-based" product features depends largely on the Company’s ability to earn target spreads between earned investment rates on assets and interest credited to policyholders.
The primary investment objective for the Company is to maximize economic value, consistent with acceptable risk parameters, including the management of credit risk and interest rate sensitivity of invested assets, while generating sufficient after-tax income to meet policyholder and corporate obligations. The Company maintains a prudent investment strategy that may vary based on a variety of factors including business needs,
regulatory requirements and tax considerations.
CHANGE IN CONTROL; AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE THE CLASS B SHARES; ANTICIPATED DIVESTITURE OF CONTROL
On July 29, 2020, the Harold E. Riley Foundation (the “Foundation”) became the owner of 100% of the Company’s outstanding Class B common stock (the “Class B Shares”). Because the Company’s Restated and Amended Articles of Incorporation provide that the holders of the Class B Shares shall have the exclusive right to elect a simple majority of the members of the Board of
Directors (the “Board”) of the Company, as of such date, the Foundation controlled the Company (the “change in control”).
Following the change in control, several material events occurred that impacted us:
•On August 5, 2020, Geoffrey M. Kolander, our President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board, resigned, triggering the change in control severance provision in his employment agreement with the Company;
•On
the same date, Gerald W. Shields, our Vice Chairman of the Board, was appointed as the Interim Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, to serve in such position while the Board conducted a search to find a permanent replacement for Mr. Kolander;
•On August 13, 2020, the Foundation delivered an Action by Written Consent of the Foundation to the Company, purporting to remove the Company’s directors elected by the Class B Shares ("Class B directors") and add five director nominees to the
Company’s Board;
•The Board disputed the Foundation's action, on the basis that the Foundation did not follow the required procedures for director appointments mandated by the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter;
•As described in Item 3. Legal Proceedings, on September 2, 2020, the Foundation filed suit against the Company and its eight directors in the District Court for Arapahoe County, Colorado (the “Colorado
Litigation”,
•and on September 28, 2020, the Foundation and the Company entered into a mutually agreed Status Quo Stipulation, whereby the Board and its committees agreed not to direct or permit anyone on their or the Company’s behalf to take any significant action that is outside the ordinary course of business without the consent of the Foundation;
•The two sole charitable beneficiaries of the Foundation, Baylor University and Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary (the “Foundation Beneficiaries”), subsequently filed a lawsuit against the Foundation and its Chief Executive Officer / President, Michael C.
Hughes (who was also one of the purported nominees submitted to the Company by the Foundation), claiming, among other things, that the Foundation’s board of trustees breached their fiduciary duties to the Foundation and misused Foundation monies for personal benefit, including the litigation against the Company in an attempt to seat themselves on the Company’s board (the “Texas Third-Party Litigation”);
•The Texas Attorney General intervened on behalf of the Foundation Beneficiaries in the Texas Third-Party Litigation; and
•On December
7, 2020, the Company filed counterclaims and third-party claims in the Colorado Litigation against the Foundation and two of its officers or trustees, Charles W. Hott and Michael C. Hughes alleging that Mr. Hughes and Mr. Hott, as trustees or officers of the Foundation, among other things: (i) defrauded state insurance regulators in order to seize control of the Company, (ii) breached their fiduciary duties to all of the Company’s shareholders, and (iii) violated the Colorado Consumer Protection Act (collectively, the “Counterclaims").
On February 6, 2021, the Foundation Beneficiaries
settled the Texas Third-Party Litigation with the Foundation in which they alleged that the Foundation trustees, including Mr. Hughes and Mr. Hott, breached their fiduciary duties
to
the Foundation and misused Foundation monies for personal benefit, including the filing of the Colorado Litigation (see Item 3, Legal Proceedings - “Texas Suit filed by the Foundation’s Beneficiaries against the Foundation”). As a result of their settlement, Mr. Hughes and Mr. Hott were removed as trustees from the Foundation. The Foundation Beneficiaries, upon gaining control of the Foundation through their appointed trustees to the Foundation, agreed to dismiss the Colorado Litigation and entered into a Mutual Agreement for Compromise, Settlement and Release with the Company and its individual directors (the “Foundation Settlement Agreement”).
As a result of the Foundation Settlement Agreement:
•The
Company, its directors and the Foundation dismissed all claims at issue in the Colorado Litigation and the parties agreed to mutual releases for conduct prior to February 5, 2021;
•The Foundation withdrew the Foundation nominees who had been submitted pursuant to the August 13, 2020 Action by Written Consent of the Foundation and approved the restoration of the four Class B directors named above; and
•The Foundation agreed to sell, and the
Company agreed to purchase, 100% of the Company’s Class B Shares from the Foundation for $9.1 million.
On February 6, 2021, pursuant to the Foundation Settlement Agreement, the Company entered into an agreement with the Foundation to purchase all of the Class B Shares for a purchase price of $9.1 million (the “B Share Transaction”). As required by the insurance holding company systems laws that govern our insurance subsidiaries, the Company and the Foundation are in the process of acquiring
the necessary regulatory approvals to consummate the B Share Transaction. On March 5, 2021, the Company paid the purchase price to the Foundation to hold in escrow until the regulatory approval has been obtained. As of the date that all such required regulatory approvals are obtained, the Foundation will deliver the Class B Shares to the Company and divest its control of the Company. In accordance with Colorado law, the Class B Shares will then be classified as authorized, but unissued shares. Once the Class B Shares are classified as unissued shares:
•the
Company will only have one class of stock outstanding: the Class A common stock, which is registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”); and
•the Class B Shares will not have any voting rights; and
•the holders of the Class A shares will be entitled to elect all of the directors at the Company’s annual meetings (after any annual meeting for which the record date has already occurred); and
•the Company will no longer be a “controlled” company as defined under the NYSE rules and therefore will be obligated to comply
with certain additional listing standards.
Due to the settlement of the Colorado Litigation and the B Share Transaction, the Company believes that it will be better positioned to hire a new Chief Executive Officer and offer stability to our management team, employees and independent sales force in order to move forward with our business and Strategic Initiatives, as described below.
STRATEGIC INITIATIVES
During 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic shifted customer, agent and employee needs, habits and expectations and forced virtualization of our operations. When the pandemic emerged, we took immediate steps to ensure business continuity and stability. Towards
the end of 2020 and as we head into 2021, we accelerated longer-term recovery efforts and pivoted to reemphasize growth in order to cultivate enduring value for our key stakeholders.
We entered 2021 with clearly defined priorities in order to set a course for long-term profitable growth. Our growth strategy consists of focusing on our customers’ needs, our sales force, and use of technology to improve our processes:
•Customers. We are focusing on our customer needs by making changes to enhance existing products, repricing products and introducing new offerings.
•Sales Force. We are focused on implementing sales promotions and campaigns in order to align our sales consultant compensation opportunities with our premium revenue goals and growth initiatives.
•Technology. We are implementing process improvements and new technologies in order to get products to our customers faster, help our sales force by promoting safe, yet effective sales practices, and help our employees
work more effectively and efficiently.
We believe this 3-prong growth strategy will help us grow premium revenues in existing markets and allow us to expand into new markets. We are executing on this strategy as follows:
Expansion of Life Insurance Segment into Hispanic US Market in 2021. Because we have developed the ability to complete insurance transactions end-to-end in Spanish and Portuguese and understand the needs of the Hispanic market due to over 45 years of doing business in Latin America, we have expanded our Life Insurance segment to the Hispanic market in the U.S. and expect to begin selling in this market during early 2021.We have developed a whole life insurance product for this expansion that has already been approved in
the state of Florida and are partnering with a marketing agency to build out a sales force to sell this product.
Transformation of our Home Service Insurance Segment. The Home Service Insurance business is a focus of transformation to drive sales growth for the Company in 2021. Prior to mid-2020, the focus of this segment was collections, i.e. renewal premiums. We reorganized our sales force, hired a new director of sales in 2020 and expect to update our product portfolio, to bring attractive and highly competitive offerings to market in early 2021.
Launched New Marketing Campaigns.In 2020, we recognized the value that having different sales
campaigns throughout the year had on our sales force and launched sales campaigns throughout 2020 that incentivized agents at all levels of seniority. The incentives were different depending on the campaign, however they all created competition within the sales force, which we believe drove more sales per independent consultant / agent.In 2020:
•In our Life Insurance segment, we created a sales campaign that helped lead to 75% higher first year premiums in the fourth quarter of 2020 as compared to the third quarter of 2020 and 15% higher first year premiums when compared to the fourth quarter of 2019. The amount of first year premiums in our Life Insurance segment in the fourth quarter of 2020 were the highest since the fourth quarter of 2017. We believe the reason this campaign worked so well was because of the
various levels of detail included in the incentives, as well as our execution of the campaign.
•In the Home Service Insurance segment, we launched a sales campaign with incentives to our independent agents that resulted in an increase in the amount of in-force insurance for our current customer base.
Multiple campaigns are scheduled to occur during 2021 in order to continue incentivizing and motivating our sales force.
Implemented Operational Improvements. As the world became more digital in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented technological improvements to make our operations more effective and efficient. We updated our underwriting processes and introduced a revised policy application for
our international business in order to remove barriers to sales with a more frictionless process for agents and applicants and to reduce underwriting expense. We enhanced our policyholder and agent self-services with new capabilities to make it easier to do business with us including expanding our alternative payment methods for our Home Service Insurance segment to accept credit card and debit card payments. We also focused on training our sales force to sell our policies and service our policyholders virtually.
As we seek to optimize value for the Company, its customers and its distributors, we believe our efforts to develop and enhance our products, incentivize our sales force and make process and technology improvements will continue to put the
Company on a stronger financial footing and drive sustainable growth.
Our
Life Insurance segment primarily operates through CICA Life Ltd. ("CICA Ltd."), a Bermuda company, which issues ordinary whole life insurance in U.S. dollar-denominated amounts to non-U.S. residents. These products are designed to provide a fixed amount of insurance coverage over the life of the insured and can include rider benefits to provide additional coverage and annuity benefits to enhance accumulations. Additionally, CICA Ltd. issues endowment contracts, which are principally accumulation contracts that incorporate an element of life insurance protection.
INTERNATIONAL SALES
We focus our international sales of U.S. dollar-denominated
ordinary whole life insurance and endowment policies to residents in Latin America and the Pacific Rim.
As of December 31, 2020, we had insurance policies in force in more than 75 foreign countries, with Colombia, Venezuela, Taiwan, Ecuador and Argentina as our top producing countries. International direct premiums comprised approximately 96% of total direct premiums in the Life Insurance segment and 71% of our total direct premiums in 2020.
We believe positive attributes of our international insurance business typically include:
•larger face amount policies issued when compared to our U.S. operations, which results in lower underwriting and administrative
costs per dollar of coverage;
•high persistency and low mortality charges due to our customer demographics; and
•premiums paid annually at the beginning of each policy year rather than monthly or quarterly, which reduces our administrative expenses, accelerates cash flow and results in lower policy lapse rates than premium payment options with more frequently scheduled payments.
Our international sales force consists of independent marketing agencies and consultants who specialize in marketing life insurance products and generally have several years of insurance marketing experience. We enter into contracts with the independent marketing agencies pursuant to
which they recruit, train and supervise their managers and associates in the sales and service of our products. These agencies receive commissions for products they sell, as well as commission overrides on the business that their agents produce and in return for the override, they guarantee any debt their agents owe to us. Their sales agents also contract directly with us as independent consultants and receive commission compensation directly from us. This allows us to develop a relationship with their associates so if an agency contract is terminated for any reason, we may seek to continue the existing independent consultant marketing arrangements with the associates of such agency. Our agreements typically provide that the agencies and their agents are independent consultants responsible
for their own operational expenses and are the representative of the prospective insured. Our contracts require the independent marketing agencies and consultants to understand and comply with all laws applicable to sales of our products in their country.
INTERNATIONAL PRODUCTS
We offer several ordinary whole life insurance and endowment products designed to meet the needs of our non-U.S. policyowners. These products have premium rates that are competitive with most foreign local companies and have been structured to provide the policyowners with:
•U.S. dollar-denominated cash values that accumulate, beginning in
the first policy year, throughout a policyholder’s lifetime;
•protection against devaluation of the policyowners' local currency;
•capital investment in a more secure economic environment (i.e., the U.S.); and
•lifetime income guarantees for an insured or for surviving beneficiaries.
Our international products have both living and death benefit features. Most policies contain guaranteed cash values and are participating (i.e., provide for cash dividends as apportioned by our Board of Directors). Once a
policyowner pays the annual premium and the policy is issued, the owner becomes entitled to policy cash dividends as well as annual premium benefits if the annual premium benefit is elected. The policyowner has several options with regards to the policy dividends and annual premium benefits, which include, among other things, electing to receive cash, crediting such amounts towards the payment of premiums on the policy, leaving such amounts on deposit with the
Company to accumulate at a defined interest rate or assigning them to a third-party. Under the "assigned to a third-party" provision, the Company has historically allowed policyowners, after receiving a copy of the Citizens, Inc. Stock Investment Plan (the "CISIP") prospectus and acknowledging their understanding of the risks of investing in Citizens Class A common stock, the right to assign policy values outside of the policy to the CISIP, which is administered in the United States by Computershare Trust Company, N.A., our plan administrator and an affiliate of Computershare, Inc., our transfer agent. The CISIP is a direct stock purchase plan available to policyowners, shareholders, our employees and directors, independent consultants, and other potential investors through the Computershare website. The
Company has registered the shares of Class A common stock issuable to participants under the CISIP on a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") that is on file with the SEC. Computershare administers the CISIP in accordance with the terms and conditions of the CISIP, a copy of which is available on the Computershare website and as part of the Company’s registration statement on file with the SEC.
INTERNATIONAL COMPETITION
The life insurance business is highly competitive. We compete with a number of stock and mutual life insurance companies internationally
and domestically, as well as with financial institutions that offer insurance products.
We face competition primarily from other insurance companies that operate in the same manner as we do, as well as companies formed and operated in the country in which an insured resides, and from companies foreign to the countries in which their products are sold, but issue insurance policies denominated in the local currency of those countries. Some companies may have a competitive advantage over us due to their significantly greater financial resources, histories of successful operations and larger marketing forces.
Because premiums on our international policies are paid in U.S. dollars and we pay claims and benefits in U.S. dollars, we provide life insurance solutions that we believe are different from and
superior to those offered by foreign-domiciled companies. We believe our international products are usually purchased by individuals in the upper-middle class in their respective countries and those with significant net worth and earnings that place them in the upper income brackets of their respective countries. The policies sold by our foreign competitors are generally offered broadly and are priced using the mortality of the entire population of the geographic region. Our mortality charges are typically lower due to our customer demographics, which provides a competitive advantage. Additionally, the assets backing the reserves for our foreign competitors' policies must be substantially invested in their respective foreign countries and, therefore, are exposed to the inflationary risks and social or economic crises that have been more common in these foreign countries.
DOMESTIC SALES
Domestic
whole life insurance policies are sold to U.S. citizens and certain U.S. visa holders through our CICA Life Insurance Company of America ("CICA") and Citizens National Life Insurance Company ("CNLIC") insurance subsidiaries. In 2020, domestic direct premiums comprised approximately 4% of total direct premiums in the Life Insurance segment and 3% of our total direct premiums overall. The majority of our domestic in force business results from blocks of business of insurance companies we have acquired over the years. CICA and CNLIC issued ordinary whole life, credit life and disability and accident and health related policies throughout the Midwest and Southern U.S. until they ceased most domestic sales beginning January 1, 2017. As discussed above under “Strategic Initiatives”, we plan to begin marketing our
products again domestically in early 2021, beginning in Florida. We believe that our experience in developing and selling products in Latin America will help us expand into the large Hispanic market in the U.S.
Our domestic life insurance products have historically focused primarily on living needs and providing benefits focused toward accumulating financial benefits for the policyowner. The features of our domestic life insurance products include:
•cash accumulation/living benefits;
•tax-deferred interest earnings;
•guaranteed lifetime income options;
•monthly income for surviving family members;
•accidental death benefit coverage options; and
•an
option to waive premium payments in the event of disability.
Our life insurance products have historically been designed to address the insured's concern about outliving his or her monthly income, while at the same time providing death benefits. The primary purpose of our current product portfolio is to help the insured create capital for needs such as retirement income, children's higher education, business opportunities, emergencies and health care needs. In addition, our insurance products offer financial benefits like savings protection and immediate funds in event of the insured's death.
Through detailed research and analysis, the Company has recognized the opportunity to re-enter the domestic life insurance market.
We believe that we hold a strong competitive edge in the fast-growing Latin American and Hispanic segments because of our insights and expertise from doing business for over 45 years in Latin America. We have developed competitive and attractive products that we believe will allow us to succeed in the domestic market.
HOME SERVICE INSURANCE
We operate our domestic Home Service Insurance segment only in the U.S. through our subsidiaries Security Plan Life Insurance Company ("SPLIC"), Magnolia Guaranty Life Insurance Company ("MGLIC") and Security Plan Fire Insurance Company ("SPFIC"). These companies focus on final expense life insurance needs of middle- and lower-income markets, primarily in Louisiana,
Mississippi and Arkansas. Our policies are sold and serviced through a home service marketing distribution system of about 240 independent agents as of December 31, 2020, who work on a route system and through over 175 funeral homes, all of whom sell policies, collect premiums and service policyholders. We also sell limited liability, named peril property policies covering dwelling and contents through SPFIC. In 2020, our Home Service Insurance segment comprised 27% of our total consolidated direct premiums.
HOME SERVICE PRODUCTS AND COMPETITION
Our Home Service Insurance products consist primarily of small face amount ordinary whole life and pre-need policies, which are designed to fund final expenses for the insured (e.g. funeral and burial costs). The average
life insurance policy face amount issued in 2020 was approximately $5,400 per policy. Due to the lower risk associated with small face amount polices, the underwriting performed on these applications is limited. To a much lesser extent, our Home Service Insurance segment sells limited liability named-peril property policies covering dwellings and content. We provide $30,000 maximum coverage on any one dwelling and contents, while content-only coverage and dwelling-only coverage are both limited to $20,000.
We provide final expense ordinary life insurance and annuity products primarily to middle- and lower-income individuals and families in Louisiana, Mississippi and Arkansas, a demographic that has been disproportionally impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
We face competition in Louisiana, Mississippi
and Arkansas from other companies specializing in final expense insurance. We seek to compete based upon our emphasis on personal service to our customers. We intend to continue premium growth within this segment via direct sales.
We
follow the industry practice of reinsuring a portion of our insurance risks with unaffiliated reinsurers. In a reinsurance transaction, a reinsurer agrees to indemnify another insurer for part or all of its liability under a policy or policies it has issued for an agreed upon premium. We participate in reinsurance activities in order to minimize exposure to significant risks, limit losses, and provide additional capacity for future growth. We enter into various agreements with reinsurers that cover individual risks, group risks or defined blocks of business, primarily on a coinsurance, yearly renewable term, excess of loss or catastrophe excess basis. These reinsurance agreements spread risk and minimize the effect of losses. For the majority of our business, we retain the first $100,000 of risk on any one life and reinsure the remainder of the risk. Therefore, under the terms of the reinsurance agreements, the reinsurers agree to reimburse us for the ceded amount
(i.e., the death benefit amount less our retained risk) in the event a claim is paid. Cessions under reinsurance agreements do not discharge our obligations as the primary insurer. In the event reinsurers do not meet their obligations under the terms of the reinsurance agreements, reinsurance recoverable balances could become uncollectible. Our amounts recoverable from reinsurers represent receivables from and/or reserves ceded to reinsurers. The amounts recoverable from reinsurers were $5.8 million as of December 31, 2020.
We focus on obtaining reinsurance from a diverse group of well-established reinsurers. We have restructured our reinsurance relationships as of January 1, 2021 and reinsure our international business with three different reinsurers and our domestic business with two
reinsurers. We regularly evaluate the financial condition of our reinsurers and monitor concentration risk with our reinsurers.
OTHER NON-INSURANCE ENTERPRISES
Other Non-Insurance Enterprises includes the results of the parent company, Citizens, Inc. and our non-insurance subsidiary, Computing Technology, Inc., which entities primarily provide the Company's information technology and corporate-support functions to the insurance operations.
OPERATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY
Our administrative operations principally serve our Life Insurance segment and are conducted primarily at our
executive offices in Austin, Texas where our administrative, operating and underwriting personnel are located. Our executive offices are also the base for our policy design, marketing oversight, underwriting, accounting and reporting, actuarial, customer service, legal, human resources, claims processing, administrative and investing activities. Our Home Service Insurance segment is conducted, to a large degree, from our district offices in Louisiana, Arkansas and Mississippi, as well as our service center in Donaldsonville, Louisiana. At our Bermuda office, we perform underwriting, policy issuance, claims processing, accounting and reporting related to CICA Ltd.'s policies.
We have a single integrated information technology system for our entire Company, which is a centrally-controlled, mainframe-based administrative system. Functions of our policy administrative system include policy
set-up, administration, billing and collections, commission calculation, valuation, automated data edits, storage backup, image management and other related functions. Each company and block of business we have acquired has been converted onto our administrative system. This system has been in place for more than 30 years and has been updated on an ongoing basis as technology has evolved.
The Company has an enterprise risk management function ("ERM") that analyzes the Company’s risks on an individual and aggregated basis and is responsible for ensuring that the Company’s risks remain within its risk appetite and tolerances as determined by management with oversight from the Audit Committee. The Company's focus
on ERM strengthens its risk management culture and discipline. The mission of ERM is to support the Company in achieving its strategic priorities by:
•providing a comprehensive view of the risks facing the Company, including risk concentrations and correlations;
•helping management define the Company’s overall capacity and appetite for risk by evaluating the risk return profile of the business relative to the Company’s strategic intent and financial underpinning;
•assisting
management in setting specific risk tolerances and limits that are measurable, actionable, and comply with the Company’s overall risk philosophy;
•communicating and monitoring the Company’s risk exposures relative to set limits and recommending, or implementing as appropriate, mitigating strategies; and
•providing insight to assist in growing the businesses and achieving optimal risk-adjusted returns within established guidelines.
ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE AND GOVERNANCE
Effective risk oversight is an important priority
for the Company’s Board and senior management team. While it is the job of the Chief Executive Officer and senior management to assess and manage the Company’s risk exposure through ERM, the Audit Committee of the Board is charged with discussing guidelines and policies to govern the process by which ERM is handled. The Audit Committee periodically discusses the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures.
The four broad categories of risk exposures assessed and managed by senior management include, but are not limited to:
•Strategic
risk, including international business risks;
•Insurance risk, including those arising out of unforeseen events (such as the COVID-19 pandemic), catastrophes and acts of terrorism;
•Financial risk, including market, credit and liquidity risks; and
•Operational risk, including cybersecurity risk and legal and regulatory compliance risks.
In addition, any other risk that poses a material threat to the operational and/or strategic viability of the Company is immediately reviewed and assessed.
In addition to the Audit Committee,
the Compensation Committee considers the risks that may be presented by our executive compensation philosophy and programs, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the Company’s governance practices, director succession and committee composition and leadership to manage risks associated with corporate governance. Although risk oversight is conducted primarily through committees of the Board, the full Board has retained responsibility for general oversight of risks. The Board satisfies this responsibility through full reports by each committee chair regarding the committees’ considerations and actions, as well as through regular reports directly from officers responsible for oversight of particular risks within the Company.
REGULATION
The
insurance industry is heavily regulated and both Citizens and our insurance subsidiaries are subject to regulation and supervision by the U.S. states in which they do business and for CICA Ltd., by Bermuda.
Our U.S. insurance operations are subject to a wide variety of laws and regulations. State insurance laws establish supervisory agencies with broad regulatory authority to regulate most aspects of our U.S. insurance businesses, and our insurance subsidiaries are regulated by the insurance departments of each state in which they are licensed. In addition to insurance-specific laws, U.S. laws, such as the USA Patriot Act of 2001, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, the International Money Laundering Abatement and Financial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, are examples of U.S. laws that affect our business. We are subject to comprehensive regulations under the USA Patriot Act and the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act with respect to money laundering, as well as federal regulations regarding privacy and confidentiality. Our U.S.-based insurance products and thus our businesses also are affected by U.S. federal, state and local tax laws.
The laws and regulations that affect our insurance business are enacted primarily to protect our insureds and not our stockholders. Many of the laws and regulations to which we are subject are regularly re-examined, and existing or future laws and regulations may become more restrictive or otherwise adversely affect our operations. In addition, insurance regulatory authorities (including state law enforcement
agencies and attorneys general) periodically make inquiries and regularly conduct examinations regarding compliance by us and our subsidiaries with insurance, and other laws and regulations regarding the conduct of our insurance businesses. It is our practice to fully and consistently cooperate with such inquiries and examinations and take corrective action when warranted.
Our U.S. insurance subsidiaries are collectively licensed to transact business in 31 states and in the District of Columbia. We have insurance subsidiaries domiciled in the states of Colorado, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. Our U.S. insurance
subsidiaries are licensed and regulated in all U.S. jurisdictions in which they conduct insurance business. The extent of this regulation varies, but most jurisdictions have laws and regulations based upon the National Association of Insurance Commissioners ("NAIC") model rules governing the financial condition of insurers, including standards of solvency, types and concentration of investments, establishment and maintenance of reserves, credit for reinsurance and requirements of capital adequacy, and the business conduct of insurers, including marketing and sales practices and claims handling. In addition, statutes and regulations usually require the licensing of insurers and their agents, the approval of policy forms and related materials and the approval of rates for certain types of insurance products.
All
U.S. jurisdictions in which our U.S. insurance subsidiaries conduct insurance business have enacted legislation that requires each U.S. insurance company in a holding company system, except captive insurance companies, to register with the insurance regulatory authority of its jurisdiction of domicile and to furnish that regulatory authority with financial and other information concerning the operations of, and the interrelationships and transactions among, companies within its holding company system that may materially affect the operations, management or financial condition of the insurers within the system. These laws and regulations also regulate transactions between insurance companies and their parents and affiliates. Generally, these laws and regulations require that all transactions within a holding company system between an insurer and its affiliates be fair and reasonable
and that the insurer's statutory capital and surplus following any transaction with an affiliate be both reasonable in relation to its outstanding liabilities and adequate to its financial needs. For certain types of agreements and transactions between an insurer and its affiliates, these laws and regulations require prior notification to, and non-disapproval or approval by, the insurance regulatory authority of the insurer's jurisdiction of domicile.
The payment of dividends or other distributions to us by our insurance subsidiaries is regulated by the insurance laws and regulations of their respective state or jurisdiction of domicile. The laws and regulations of some of these jurisdictions also prohibit an insurer from declaring or paying a dividend except out of its earned surplus or require
the insurer to obtain regulatory approval before it may do so. In addition, insurance regulators may prohibit the payment of ordinary dividends or other payments by our insurance subsidiaries to us (such as a payment under a tax sharing agreement or for employee or other services) if they determine such payment could be adverse to policyholders or insurance contract holders of the subsidiary.
The laws and regulations of the jurisdictions in which our U.S. insurance subsidiaries are domiciled require that a controlling party obtain the approval of the insurance commissioner of the insurance company's jurisdiction
of domicile prior to acquiring or divesting control of the insurer and may delay, deter or prevent a transaction our
shareholders might consider desirable. As
described above, the Company and the Foundation are in the process of obtaining such regulatory approval in order for the Company to purchase the Class B common stock from the Foundation.
Risk-based capital ("RBC") requirements are imposed on life and property and casualty insurance companies. The NAIC has established minimum capital requirements in the form of RBC. RBC requirements weight the type of business underwritten by an insurance company, the quality of its assets, and various other aspects of an insurance company's business to develop a minimum level of capital called "authorized control level risk-based capital" and compares this level to adjusted statutory capital that includes capital
and surplus as reported under statutory accounting principles, plus certain investment reserves. Should the ratio of adjusted statutory capital to control level risk-based capital fall below 200%, a series of actions would be required by the affected company, including submitting a capital plan to the Department of Insurance in the insurance company's state of domicile.
INTERNATIONAL REGULATION
Bermuda
CICA Ltd., our Bermuda domiciled subsidiary, is subject to regulation and supervision by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (the "BMA") and compliance with all applicable Bermuda laws and insurance statutes and regulations, including but not limited to Bermuda’s Insurance Act of 1978 (the "Insurance Act").
CICA
Ltd., which is incorporated to conduct long-term business, is registered as a Class E insurer, which is the license class for long-term insurers and reinsurers with total assets of more than $500 million that are not registrable as a single-parent or multi-owner long-term captive insurer or reinsurer. CICA Ltd. is not licensed to conduct any business other than life insurance business. The Insurance Act regulates the insurance business of CICA Ltd. and provides that no person may conduct any insurance business in or within Bermuda unless registered as an insurer under the Insurance Act by the BMA.
The Insurance Act imposes solvency and liquidity standards as well as auditing and reporting requirements and confers on the BMA powers to supervise, investigate and intervene in the affairs of insurance companies. Certain requirements of the Insurance Act include: the filing of annual statutory
financial returns; the filing of annual U.S. GAAP financial statements; the filing of an annual capital and solvency return; the delivery of a declaration of compliance; compliance with minimum enhanced capital requirements; compliance with the BMA’s Insurance Code of Conduct; compliance with minimum solvency margins; limitations on dividends and distributions that CICA Ltd. may make to Citizens, its parent company; preparation of an annual Financial Condition Report providing details of measures governing the business operations, corporate governance framework, solvency and financial performance; preparation of an assessment of an insurer's own risk and solvency requirements, referred to as a Commercial Insurer’s Solvency Self-Assessment; the establishment and maintenance of a head and principal office in Bermuda; appointment of an independent auditor; and appointment of an actuary approved by the BMA.
The
BMA measures an insurer’s risk and determines appropriate levels of capitalization by using a risk-based capital model called the Bermuda Solvency Capital Requirement (“BSCR”), which CICA Ltd. uses to calculate its solvency requirements. The BSCR employs a standard mathematical model that correlates the risk underwritten by Bermuda insurers to their capital.
In order to minimize the risk of a shortfall in capital arising from an unexpected adverse deviation or excess risk, the BMA has established a threshold capital level (termed the Target Capital Level ("TCL")), which is set at 120% of a company’s enhanced capital requirement. The TCL serves as an early warning tool for the BMA. For the quarter ended March 31, 2020, because of the disruption that the COVID-19 pandemic had on the worldwide economy, the fair value
of our assets decreased and interest rates also decreased, which increased the fair value of our statutory economic insurance liabilities. As a result, CICA Ltd.’s statutory economic capital and surplus at March 31, 2020 was below the TCL by $8.9 million. While the failure to meet the minimum threshold was rectified as of April 30, 2020, the BMA conducted a review of CICA Ltd. in the third and fourth quarter of 2020 in order to assess CICA Ltd.’s compliance with the Insurance Act and other relevant rules applicable to CICA Ltd. (the “Prudential Review”). As a result of the 2020 Prudential Review by the BMA, on January 14, 2021, the BMA issued a letter to CICA Ltd. that, among other things, requires Citizens to enter into a “Keepwell Agreement” by September 30,
2021. A Keepwell Agreement is a contract between a parent company and its subsidiary to maintain solvency and financial
backing
throughout the term set in the agreement. The Keepwell Agreement should include a specific target solvency level at which a capital injection would be required to be made into CICA Ltd. to ensure compliance with the Insurance Act and related rules.
Bermuda law distinguishes between those companies that are at least 60% owned and controlled by Bermudians, which are "local companies", and those which are owned and controlled by non-Bermudians, which are "exempted companies". Exempted companies may be resident in Bermuda and conduct business from Bermuda in connection with transactions and activities which are external to Bermuda or with other exempted companies, and exempted companies must obtain a license to conduct business activities within Bermuda from the Minister of Finance of Bermuda. Generally, it is not permitted without a special license granted by the Minister
of Finance of Bermuda to insure Bermuda domestic risks or risks of persons of, in or based in Bermuda.
In December 2018, the Economic Substance Act (the "ES Act") came into force. The ES Act, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder (collectively, "ES Law"), apply to any "relevant entity" that conducts any "relevant activity" in a "relevant financial period". Under the ES Law, insurance and holding entities are each defined as a "relevant activity" and thus the ES Act applies to CICA Ltd. Under the provisions of the ES Law, a relevant entity that conducts a relevant activity must satisfy the economic substance requirements under the ES Law (the "ES Requirements") in relation to the relevant activity and where a relevant entity is conducting more than one relevant activity, it must meet the ES Requirements with respect to
each relevant activity that it conducts. A relevant entity complies with the ES Requirements if: (a) the relevant entity is managed and directed from Bermuda; (b) the core income-generating activities are undertaken in Bermuda with respect to each relevant activity; (c) the relevant entity maintains adequate physical presence in Bermuda; (d) there are adequate full-time employees in Bermuda with suitable qualifications; and (e) there is adequate operating expenditure incurred in Bermuda in relation to each relevant activity.
CICA Ltd. is required to demonstrate compliance with the ES Requirements by filing an annual economic substance declaration with the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda no later than six months after the last day of the relevant financial period. Companies that conduct insurance as a relevant activity are deemed to comply with the ES Requirements, with respect
to their insurance business, if they comply with the existing regulatory requirements under the Insurance Act and the corporate governance provisions of the Companies Act 1981. CICA Ltd. is in compliance with these requirements as of December 31, 2020.
Other International Regulation
Generally, all foreign countries in which we offer insurance products require a license or other authority to conduct insurance business in that country. Some of these countries also require that local regulatory authorities approve the terms of any insurance product sold to residents of that country. We have never qualified to do business in any foreign country or jurisdiction and have never submitted our insurance policies issued to residents of foreign countries for
approval by any foreign or domestic insurance regulatory agency. As described above, we sell our policies to residents of foreign countries through independent marketing agencies and independent consultants located in those countries, and we rely on our independent consultants to comply with laws applicable to them in marketing our insurance products in their respective countries.
We have undertaken a comprehensive compliance review of risks associated with the potential application of foreign laws to our sales of insurance policies in foreign countries. The application of foreign laws to our sales of insurance policies in foreign countries varies by country. There is a lack of uniform regulation, lack of clarity in certain regulations and lack of legal precedent in addressing circumstances similar to ours. Our compliance review has confirmed certain risks related to foreign insurance
laws associated with our current business model, at least in certain jurisdictions, as described in detail in Item 1A. RiskFactors.
HUMAN
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our employees and independent consultants are critical to selling our insurance products and providing services to our global base of policyholders. As of December 31, 2020, we had 245 employees. We currently do not utilize captive employee agents to distribute our products and thus contract with almost 1,000 independent consultants internationally and 415 independent agencies and agents domestically to sell and service our insurance products. Independent agents work for themselves and may sell insurance policies for a variety of insurers and make most of
their money through sales commissions and bonuses. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement.
In order to continue to develop, administer and sell our products, it is crucial that we continue to attract and retain
both experienced employees and independent agents.
Compensation and Benefits Program. Our compensation program is designed to attract and reward talented individuals who possess the skills necessary to support our business objectives, assist in the achievement of our strategic goals and create long-term value for our stockholders. We provide employees with compensation packages that include base salary, annual incentive bonuses, and long-term equity awards ("RSUs") for certain employees tied to the value of our stock price. We believe that a compensation program with both short-term and long-term awards provides fair and competitive compensation and aligns employee and stockholder interests, including by incentivizing business and individual performance (pay for performance), motivating based on long-term company performance and integrating compensation
with our business plans. In addition to cash and equity compensation, we also offer standard employee benefits such as life and health (medical, dental & vision) insurance, paid parental leave, and a 401(k) plan.
We attract and retain our independent agent sales force through the use of our commission structure and agent campaigns and promotions. We believe that our standard commission structure is attractive and competitive in the market. In our Life Insurance segment, our campaigns and promotions provide an extra incentive to agents that not only promote first year premium growth, but also create improvements within policyholder retention. In our Home Service Insurance segment, our agent campaigns and promotions are critical in attracting and retaining our independent agent sales force. This business contains a large block of existing in force policies. To ensure we maintain
this book of business, the agent campaigns and promotions provide an extra incentive to not only grow the business but to collect on the existing policies. We believe that providing agent campaigns and promotions with additional incentives that provide long-term value creates an advantage for Citizens over our competition.
Diversity and Inclusion. We derive a great deal of strength from our diverse workforce. We believe that an equitable and inclusive environment with diverse teams produces more creative solutions, results in better, more innovative products and services and is crucial to our efforts to attract and retain key talent. We are focused on building on the existing executive team's work to foster diversity and inclusion in the workplace.
Health and Safety.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented significant operating environment changes that we determined were in the best interest of the health of our employees and independent agents, as well as the communities in which we operate, and which comply with government regulations. These changes included having the vast majority of our employees work from home, while implementing additional safety measures for employees continuing critical on-site work. We also created training programs to assist our independent agents with online sales efforts in order to minimize face-to-face interactions with potential customers and our policyholders.
Because of the following factors, as well as other factors affecting the Company’s financial condition and operating results, past financial performance
should not be considered to be a reliable indicator of future performance, and investors should not use historical trends to anticipate results or trends in future periods.
A
SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF OUR REVENUE IS GENERATED FROM INSURANCE PRODUCTS SOLD OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES. WHILE OUR PRODUCTS ARE PRICED AND PAID FOR IN U.S. DOLLARS, OUR FOREIGN OPERATIONS MAY SUBJECT US TO SEVERAL RISKS, SET FORTH BELOW.
Our sales to residents of foreign countries expose us to unknown risks related to foreign economies and governments. A significant loss of sales in these foreign markets would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
A substantial majority of our direct insurance premiums, approximately 71% at December 31, 2020, are from policyholders in foreign countries, primarily those in Latin America and the Pacific Rim. These policies are issued by our Bermuda subsidiary, CICA Ltd.
and are sold by independent consultants who are located in these foreign countries.
Our Company’s sales and financial results depend upon the ability of our independent consultants in foreign countries to effectively distribute our products and the ability of residents of such countries to purchase our products using U.S. dollars. While we have undertaken a comprehensive compliance review of risks associated with the potential application of foreign laws, which vary by country, to our sales of insurance policies in foreign countries, there is a lack of uniform regulation and lack of clarity in certain regulations and thus we face various risks associated with the application of foreign laws to these sales.
Generally,
all foreign countries in which we offer insurance products require either CICA Ltd. and/or our independent consultants to obtain a license or other authority to conduct insurance business in that country. Some of these countries also require that local regulatory authorities approve the terms of any insurance product sold to residents of that country. We have never sought to qualify to do business in any foreign country or jurisdiction, except Bermuda, in which CICA Ltd. is domiciled, and have never submitted the insurance policies that we issue to residents of foreign countries for approval by any foreign or domestic insurance regulatory agency. Some foreign governments have determined under their existing laws that their residents may not purchase life insurance from us unless we become qualified to do business in that country or unless our policies purchased by their residents receive prior approval from its insurance regulators. There is a risk that additional foreign
governments will enact additional legislation that may render our existing insurance products either illegal or less attractive to potential customers. There is the further risk that regulators may become more aggressive in enforcing any perceived violations of their laws and seek to impose monetary fines, criminal penalties, and/or order us to cease our sales in that jurisdiction. There is no assurance that, if a foreign country were to require that we qualify to do business in that country or submit our policies for approval by that country’s regulatory authorities, we would be able to, or would conclude that it is advisable to, comply with those requirements. Any determination by a foreign country that we or our policy sales are subject to regulation under their laws, or any actions by a foreign country to enforce such laws more aggressively, could therefore have a material adverse effect on our ability to sell policies in that country and, in turn, on our results
of operations and financial condition.
Traditionally, we have sought to mitigate risks associated with the potential application of foreign laws to our sales of insurance policies in our foreign markets by, among other things, not locating any of our offices or assets in foreign countries or jurisdictions, selling policies only through independent consultants rather than our own employees, requiring that all applications for insurance be submitted to and accepted only in our offices in the U.S. or, following the novation of our international policies to CICA Ltd. in Bermuda effective July 1, 2018, in our offices in Bermuda, and requiring that policy premiums be paid to us only in U.S. dollars. We rely on our independent consultants to comply with laws applicable to them in marketing our insurance products in their respective countries.
There is no assurance that the precautionary measures, practices and policies discussed above will partially or entirely mitigate the risk associated with the potential application of foreign laws to our sales of insurance policies in our foreign markets. From time to time, insurance regulators in the foreign countries in which we operate have sought to exercise regulatory authority over the Company, including through the imposition of fines and we have chosen not to do business in certain countries, such as Brazil, due to these actions. Although the Company believes that these foreign regulators do not have jurisdiction over the Company and that any actions, including fines, may be unenforceable against the
Company, any regulatory action could otherwise absorb Company time and resources away from its business operations or the Company may choose to pay such fines in order to do business in a particular country. The Company may determine that the risks associated with a particular market and its regulatory environment outweigh the benefits of conducting further business in that market. We are exploring alternatives to our current business model in one or more jurisdictions.
Any disruption to the marketing and sale of our policies to residents of foreign countries, resulting from the actions of foreign regulatory authorities, the withdrawal from Brazil or other markets, the implementation of new Bermuda regulatory obligations or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our premium revenue and our costs and expenses and thus on our results of operations and financial condition.
Additionally, currency
control laws, other currency exchange restrictions or tax laws in foreign countries could materially adversely affect our revenues by imposing restrictions or additional fees, costs or taxes on asset transfers outside of a country where our policyowners reside. Difficulties in transferring funds from or converting currencies to U.S. dollars in certain countries or any increase in fees, costs or taxes associated therewith could prevent our policyowners in those countries from purchasing or paying premiums on our policies and/or make our products less attractive to such policyowners. As such, existing or future laws and regulations, and the manner in which they are interpreted or applied, may become more restrictive or otherwise adversely affect our operations.
Many of the countries in which we operate have a history of political instability, including regime changes, political uprisings,
currency fluctuations and anti-democratic or anti-U.S. policies. The ability of people living in these countries to purchase and continue to make premium payments on our insurance policies and our ability to sell our policies in those countries through our independent consultants or otherwise may be adversely affected by political instability. Given the nature of our products, in an economic environment characterized by higher unemployment, lower personal income and reduced consumer spending, new product sales may be adversely affected. During such periods, we may also experience higher claims incidence, longer claims duration, increase in policy lapses and/or increase in surrenders, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. In addition, the imposition of U.S. sanctions against foreign countries where our policyholders reside could make it difficult for us to continue to issue new policies and receive premiums
from policyholders in those countries.
We face significant competition in our international markets. If we are unable to compete effectively in our markets, our business, results of operations and profitability may be adversely affected.
Our international marketing plan focuses on offering U.S. dollar-denominated life insurance products to individuals residing in foreign countries. We experience considerable competition primarily from the following sources, many of which have substantially greater financial, marketing and other resources than we have:
•Foreign companies with U.S. dollar-denominated policies. We face direct competition from companies that operate in the same manner as we do
in our international markets, including from a company recently formed by some of our former employees and independent consultants;
•Foreign companies with locally operated subsidiaries that offer both local jurisdiction-regulated products in local currency and off-shore U.S. dollar-denominated policies. This arrangement creates competition in that the U.S. dollar-denominated policies are offered in conjunction with high-need local insurance policies such as health insurance; and
•Locally operated companies with local currency policies. We compete with companies formed and operated in the country in which our foreign insureds reside.
In addition, from time to
time, companies enter and exit the markets in which we operate, thereby increasing competition at times when there are new entrants. We may lose business to competitors offering competitive products at lower prices, or for other reasons.
Since we rely on independent consultants for distribution of our products in foreign markets, regulation and licensing requirements imposed upon our Company may impact on our ability to attract and retain effective sales representatives, who may choose to distribute products of our competitors.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete effectively in any of our markets. If we do not, our business, results of operations and financial condition will be materially adversely
affected.
We face a greater risk of money laundering activity associated with sales derived from residents of certain foreign countries.
Some of our top international markets are in countries identified by the U.S. Department of State as jurisdictions of high risk for money laundering. As required by the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act regulations, the Bermuda Proceeds of
Crime Act 1997 and the Proceeds of Crime (Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorist Financing) Regulations 2008 applicable to insurance companies, we have developed and implemented an anti-money laundering, anti-terrorist financing and sanctions program (“AML/ATF and Sanctions Program”) that includes policies, procedures, controls, independent testing, reporting and recordkeeping requirements for deterring, preventing and detecting potential money laundering, terrorist financing, fraud and other criminal activity in order to comply with U.S. and Bermuda laws. We have an enhanced AML/ATF and Sanctions Program with additional controls, such as watch-list screening beyond sanctions screening required by the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC") and the Financial Sanctions
Implementation Unit of Bermuda, enhanced payment due diligence and transaction controls. However, there can be no assurance that these enhanced controls will entirely mitigate money laundering risk associated with these jurisdictions.
BECAUSE MOST OF OUR REVENUE DERIVES FROM COLLECTION OF PREMIUMS ON OUR PRODUCTS, OUR OVERALL FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE DEPENDS PRIMARILY UPON THE PRICING OF OUR INSURANCE PRODUCTS AND THE ACCURACY OF OUR PRICING ASSUMPTIONS. CHANGES IN ACTUAL EXPERIENCE, IMPROPER EVALUATION OF UNDERWRITING RISK AND MISMANAGEMENT OF CLAIMS HANDLING COULD SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE OUR BENEFIT AND EXPENSE COSTS AND THUS NEGATIVELY AFFECT OUR PROFITABILITY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.
The Company’s success depends on its
ability to accurately underwrite risks and to charge adequate premiums to policyholders.
The Company’s financial condition, liquidity and results of operations largely depend on the Company’s ability to underwrite and set premiums accurately for the risks it faces. Premium rate adequacy is necessary to generate sufficient premiums to offset losses, loss adjustment expenses, underwriting expenses, and to earn a profit. In order to price its products accurately, the Company must implement and modify, as needed, underwriting standards that analyze a substantial volume of data; develop and apply appropriate morbidity and mortality estimates; closely monitor
and timely recognize changes in trends; and project both severity and frequency of losses with reasonable accuracy. The Company must also review and properly underwrite applications for life insurance in order to charge a sufficient premium to its policyholders. The Company’s ability to undertake these efforts successfully is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation:
•availability of sufficient reliable data;
•incorrect or incomplete analysis of available data;
•uncertainties inherent in estimates and assumptions;
•selection
and application of appropriate rating formulae or other pricing methodologies;
•adoption of successful pricing strategies;
•prediction of policyholder retention (e.g., policy life expectancy);
•unanticipated court decisions, legislation or regulatory action;
•changes in the Company’s claim settlement practices; or
•unexpected inflation.
Such risks may result in the Company’s pricing
being based on outdated, inadequate, or inaccurate data, or inappropriate analyses, assumptions, or methodologies, and may cause the Company to estimate incorrectly future changes in the frequency or severity of claims. As a result, the Company could underprice risks, which would negatively affect the Company’s margins, or it could overprice risks, which could reduce the Company’s volume and competitiveness. The Company’s ability to accurately underwrite risks in insurance products depends in part on its ability to forecast such changes and trends. If it is not
successful in doing so, the Company’s operating results, financial condition, and cash flow could be materially adversely affected.
Pricing adequacy depends upon our ability to project future losses based on historical loss experience, including policyholder retention. Unanticipated increases in early policyholder withdrawals or surrenders or elections by policyholders to receive lump sum payouts at maturity could negatively impact liquidity.
A primary liquidity concern is the risk of unanticipated or extraordinary early policyholder withdrawals or surrenders. Our insurance policies include provisions, such as surrender charges, that help limit and discourage early withdrawals. We also track and manage liabilities and align our
investment portfolio to maintain sufficient liquidity to support anticipated withdrawal demands. However, early withdrawal and surrender levels may differ from anticipated levels for a variety of reasons, including changes in economic conditions, changes in policyholder
behavior
or financial needs, changes in relationships with our independent consultants, efforts by foreign governments to tax policyholders or increases in surrenders among policies that have been in force for more than fifteen years and are no longer subject to surrender charges.
In addition, we face potential liquidity risks if policyholders with mature policies elect to receive lump sum distributions at greater levels than anticipated. Our whole life and endowment products provide the policyholder with alternatives once the policy matures. The policyholder can choose to take a lump sum payout or leave the money on deposit at interest with the Company. The Company has a significant amount of aging endowment products that have
begun reaching their maturities and policyholder election behavior is not known. It is uncertain how policyholders will react in response to these maturities. If a large number of policyholders elect lump sum distributions, the Company could be exposed to liquidity risk in years of high maturities.
If we experience unanticipated early withdrawal or surrender activity or greater than expected lump sum distributions of endowment maturities and we do not have sufficient cash flow from our insurance operations to support payment of these benefits, we may have to sell our investments in order to meet our cash needs or be forced to obtain third-party financing. The availability of such financing will depend on a variety of factors, such as market conditions, the availability of credit in general or more specifically
in the insurance industry, the strength or weakness of the capital markets, the volume of trading activities, our credit capacity, and the perception of our long- or short-term financial prospects if we incur large realized or unrealized investment losses or if the level of business activity declines due to a market downturn. Therefore, if we are forced to sell our investments on unfavorable terms or obtain financing with unfavorable terms, it could have an adverse effect on our liquidity, results of operations and financial condition.
Our largest expense is payments of claims and surrenders to our policyholders. Mismanagement of claims handling or increased fraudulent claims could negatively impact our costs and financial condition.
Proper claims handling is critical to managing our benefit expenses. Many factors can affect the
Company’s ability to pay claims accurately, including the following:
•the training, experience, and skill of the Company’s claims representatives;
•the extent of fraudulent claims and the Company’s ability to recognize and respond to such claims;
•the claims organization’s culture and the effectiveness of its management, and
•the Company’s ability to develop or select and implement appropriate procedures, technologies,
and systems to support claims functions.
The Company’s failure to pay claims fairly, accurately, and in a timely manner, or to deploy claims resources appropriately, could result in unanticipated costs, lead to material litigation, undermine customer goodwill and the Company’s reputation in the marketplace, impair its brand image and, as a result, materially adversely affect its competitiveness, financial results, prospects, and liquidity.
Higher than expected policyholder claims related to unforeseen events may increase our benefits and expense costs, increase our reinsurance costs and negatively affect our financial condition.
Our
insurance operations are exposed to the risk of catastrophic events. The extent of losses from a catastrophe is a function of both the total amount of insured exposure in the area affected by the event and the severity of the event. Most catastrophes are restricted to small geographic areas; however, hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis and man-made catastrophes may produce significant damage or loss of life in larger areas, especially those that are heavily populated. Claims resulting from catastrophic events could cause substantial volatility in our financial results for any fiscal quarter or year and could materially reduce our profitability or harm our financial condition. In 2020, three major hurricanes caused significant damage in Louisiana, for which we paid a total of $1.2 million in claims, net of reinsurance. Additionally, we had to pay to increase our reinsurance coverage to cover an additional storm. These storms negatively impacted the results of operations
in our Home Services Insurance segment during the second half of 2020. In addition, catastrophic events could harm the financial condition of issuers of obligations we hold in our investment portfolio, resulting in impairments to these investments, and the financial condition of our reinsurers, thereby increasing the probability of default on reinsurance recoveries. Large-scale catastrophes may also reduce the overall level of economic activity in affected countries, which could hurt our business and the value of our investments or our ability to sell new policies.
The COVID-19 Pandemic is negatively impacting certain aspects of our business and, depending on severity and duration, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and overall business operations.
The prolonged COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruption to the global economy and business operations and has resulted in unfavorable impacts to our Company as well as the insurance industry. Due to the unprecedented nature of these events and the uncertainty surrounding the virus and its impacts, we cannot fully estimate the duration or
full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic at this time. However, we have identified several areas where the COVID-19 pandemic impacted our business during the year ended December 31, 2020. Events that we are unable to control, such as the spread of a new, more contagious strain of the coronavirus, spikes in the number of cases of COVID-19, slower than expected roll-out of the coronavirus vaccine and the related responses by government authorities and businesses, may continue to present unforeseen risks to our business. We are closely monitoring developments related to the COVID-19 pandemic to assess its impacts on our business.
As discussed in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources, our liquidity requirements are met primarily by funds generated by our
insurance subsidiaries and invested assets. In 2020, we experienced declines in premium income resulting from lower sales. Increased economic uncertainty or continued unemployment resulting from the economic impacts of the COVID-19 virus could continue to affect our premium revenues as policyholders may not be able to pay premiums on existing policies and potential customers may not purchase new policies in order to conserve cash. We have offered relief to policyholders (e.g. extending grace periods), which may negatively impact our operating cash flow. Historically, many of our policies have been sold via in-person meetings. Due to stay-at-home orders and limitations on interpersonal interactions, the lack of face-to-face meetings has negatively impacted sales and may continue to do so if the measures that we have put in place to encourage virtual selling prove to be ineffective.
Additionally, due to these limitations as well as disruptions to international mail delivery to and from the United States, policyholders that mail in their premiums have had, and may continue to have, difficulty paying premiums. Unfavorable developments in any of these factors may adversely affect our liquidity and capital position.
The COVID-19 pandemic has increased death claim benefits in our Home Service Insurance segment. We may experience continued increased claims, thus increasing our expected death benefits, if there continues to be an unusually large number of deaths.
During 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic, and its effect on financial markets, adversely affected our investment portfolio (and, specifically, increased the risk of defaults, downgrades and volatility in the value of the investments
we hold and lowered investment income) and may continue to do so. Extreme market volatility may continue to leave us unable to react to market events consistent with our historical practices in dealing with more stable markets. To the extent that we need to sell our investments to fund liquidity needs in the current financial markets, we may not receive the prices we seek, and may sell at a price lower than our carrying value.
Our risk management, contingency and business continuity plans may not adequately protect our operations. Extended periods of remote work arrangements and other unusual business conditions and circumstances as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic could strain our business continuity plans, introduce operational risk, increase our cybersecurity risks, and impair our ability to manage our business. The frequency and sophistication of attempts at unauthorized access
to our technology systems and fraud may increase, and COVID-19 conditions may impair our cybersecurity efforts and risk management. Our efforts to prevent money-laundering or other fraud, whether due to limited abilities to "know our customers" or otherwise, may increase our compliance costs and risk of violations.
While governmental and non-governmental organizations are continuing to engage in efforts to combat the spread and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic and related public health issues, these measures may not be effective. We also cannot predict how legal and regulatory responses to concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic and related public health issues will impact our business. Such events or conditions could result in additional regulation or restrictions affecting the conduct of our business in the future.
Our actual claims losses may exceed our reserves for claims, and we may be required to establish additional reserves, which in turn may adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.
We maintain reserves to cover our estimated exposure
for claims relating to our issued insurance policies. Reserves do not represent an exact calculation of exposure, but instead represent our best estimates using actuarial and statistical procedures. Reserve estimates are refined as experience develops, and adjustments to reserves are reflected in our statements of operations for the period in which such estimates are updated. Because establishing reserves is an inherently uncertain process involving estimates of future losses, future developments may require us to increase policy benefit reserves, which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition in the periods in which such increases occur.
We may be required to accelerate the amortization of deferred acquisition costs, which would increase our expenses and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
At
December 31, 2020, we had $104.9 million of deferred policy acquisition costs, or DAC. DAC represents costs that vary with and are directly related to the successful sale and issuance of our insurance policies and are deferred and amortized over the estimated life of the related insurance policies. These costs include commissions in excess of ultimate renewal commissions, solicitation and printing costs, sales material costs and some support costs, such as underwriting and contract and policy issuance expenses. Under U.S. GAAP for our type of insurance products, DAC is amortized over the premium-paying period of the policies.
The amortization of DAC is subject to acceleration and generally depends upon anticipated profits from investments, surrender
and other policy charges, mortality, morbidity, persistency and maintenance expense margins. For example, if our insurance policies lapse and surrender rates were to exceed the assumptions upon which we priced our insurance policies, or if actual persistency proves to be less than our persistency assumptions, especially in the early years of a policy, we might be required to accelerate the amortization of expenses we deferred in connection with the issuance of the policy. We regularly review the quality of our DAC to determine if it is recoverable from future income. If these costs are not recoverable, the amount that is not recoverable is charged to expenses in the financial period in which we make this determination.
Unfavorable experience with regards to expected expenses, investment returns, surrender and other policy charges, mortality, morbidity, lapses or persistency may cause
us to increase the amortization of DAC or to record a current period expense to increase benefit reserves, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
THE DISTRIBUTION OF OUR PRODUCTS THROUGH INDEPENDENT CONSULTANTS REDUCES OUR CONTROL OVER SALES AND DISTRIBUTION AND THUS SUBJECTS US TO CERTAIN RISKS THAT COULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR REVENUES, OUR IN-FORCE BUSINESS, AND OUR BENEFITS AND EXPENSE COSTS.
Sales of our insurance products could decline if we are unable to establish and maintain relationships with independent marketing agencies and independent consultants and agents.
We depend almost exclusively on the services of independent marketing agencies and independent
consultants and agents for the distribution of our products. These agencies, agents and consultants are key to the development and maintenance of our relationships with our policyholders. Significant competition exists among insurers in attracting and maintaining marketers of demonstrated ability. Some of our competitors may offer better compensation packages or commissions for marketing firms, independent consultants and agents or induce agents to sell their products through a broader product offering, more distribution resources, better brand recognition, more competitive pricing, lower cost structures and greater financial strength or claims paying ratings than we have. We compete with other insurers for marketing agencies, agents and independent consultants primarily on the basis of our compensation, products and support services. Any reduction in our ability to attract and retain effective sales representatives could materially adversely affect our revenues,
results of operations and financial condition.
There may be adverse tax, legal or financial consequences if our
sales representatives are determined not to be independent consultants.
Our sales representatives are independent consultants who operate their own businesses. Although we believe that we have properly classified our representatives as independent consultants, there is nevertheless a risk that the IRS, a foreign agency, a court or other authority will take the different view that our sales representatives should be classified as employees. The tests governing the determination of whether an individual is considered to be an independent consultant or an employee are typically fact-sensitive and vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Laws and regulations that govern the status and misclassification of independent sales representatives are subject to change or interpretation.
If there is a change in the manner in
which our independent consultants are classified or an adverse determination with respect to some or all of our independent consultants by a court or governmental agency, we could incur significant costs in complying with such laws and regulations, including in respect of tax withholding, social security payments, government and private pension plan contributions and recordkeeping, or we may be required to modify our business model, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, there is the risk that we may be subject to significant monetary liabilities arising from fines or judgments as a result of any such actual or alleged non-compliance with applicable federal, state, local or foreign laws.
INSURANCE IS A HIGHLY REGULATED BUSINESS. REGULATIONS VARY FROM JURISDICTION TO JURISDICTION AND MAY CHANGE FROM
TIME TO TIME. THESE REGULATIONS AFFECT OUR OPERATIONS AND CHANGES COULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR CASH FLOW, THE RESULTS OF OUR OPERATIONS, OUR LIQUIDITY AND OUR FINANCIAL CONDITIONS.
LEGAL REGULATION AND RISKS
Citizens is a holding company that has minimal operations of its own and depends on the ability of our insurance subsidiaries to make payments to us in sufficient amounts to fund our operations.Our insurance subsidiaries are restricted by applicable laws and regulations in the amounts of payments they may make to us and their ability to transfer funds to us may be impaired by adverse
financial results or a change in capital requirements. Accordingly, internal sources of capital and liquidity may not always be sufficient. If we need to seek external capital, adverse market conditions may affect our access to capital or our cost of capital.
As a holding company, our assets consist of the capital stock of our subsidiaries, cash and investments. We rely primarily on statutorily permissible payments from our insurance company subsidiaries, principally through service agreements we have with our subsidiaries, to meet our working capital needs. The ability of our insurance company subsidiaries
to make payments to us is subject to regulation by the states and jurisdictions in which they are domiciled, and these payments depend primarily on approved service agreements between us and these subsidiaries and, to a lesser extent, the statutory surplus (which is the excess of assets over liabilities as determined under statutory accounting practices prescribed by an insurance company's state of domicile), future statutory earnings (which are earnings as determined in accordance with statutory accounting practices) and regulatory restrictions.
Except to the extent that we are a creditor with recognized claims against our subsidiaries, claims of our subsidiaries'
creditors, including policyholders, have priority with respect to the assets and earnings of the subsidiaries over the claims of creditors (including us) and shareholders. If any of our subsidiaries becomes insolvent, liquidates or otherwise reorganizes, our policyholders will have a priority to receive the assets of such subsidiary and we may have no rights with respect to the liquidation, bankruptcy or winding-up of the subsidiary under applicable laws.
If our financial results are unfavorable, we may need to increase our capital in order to satisfy regulatory requirements. Maintaining appropriate levels of statutory surplus is considered important not only by us but by insurance regulatory authorities in
the U.S. and Bermuda. Failure to maintain certain levels of statutory surplus could result in increased regulatory scrutiny or action by regulatory authorities. The need for additional capital may limit a subsidiary's ability to distribute funds to us.
Additionally,
any change in demand for our insurance subsidiaries’ products or an increase in the incidence of new claims or the duration of existing claims could negatively impact their cash flows from operations. Deterioration in the credit market, which could delay our and our insurance subsidiaries’ ability to sell positions in certain fixed maturity securities in a timely manner, could also negatively impact our and our insurance subsidiaries’ cash flows. Regulatory changes such as those discussed herein in this Item 1A may impose higher capital or reserve requirements on our insurance subsidiaries and/or implement other requirements
which could unfavorably affect our liquidity. Without sufficient liquidity, our ability to maintain and grow our operations would be limited. If our internal sources of liquidity prove to be insufficient, we may be unable to successfully obtain additional financing and capital on favorable terms, or at all, which may adversely affect us.
Obtaining financing for even a small amount of capital could be challenging in unfavorable market conditions and during periods of economic uncertainty. The markets may exert downward pressure on availability of liquidity and credit capacity for certain issuers. The availability of financing will depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions, the general availability of credit, the overall availability of credit to the financial services industry, and the possibility that customers or lenders could develop a negative perception of our financial
prospects. Similarly, our access to funds may be impaired if regulatory authorities take negative actions against us. Raising capital in unfavorable market conditions could increase our interest expense or negatively impact our shareholders through increased dilution of their common stock in the Company.
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to minimum capital and surplus requirements, and any failure to meet these requirements could subject us to regulatory action.
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to minimum capital and surplus requirements in both
the U.S. and internationally, as described below. If we fail to meet these standards and requirements, our various regulators may require specified actions to be taken, which could have a material and adverse impact on the Company’s competitiveness, operational flexibility, financial condition, and results of operations.
CICA Ltd. is subject to extensive supervision and regulation by the BMA and the Ministry of Finance of Bermuda (“MOF”). Failure to comply with regulation by the BMA and the MOF may increase our costs of doing business, restrict the conduct of our business and negatively impact our financial position or results of operations.
CICA Ltd. was registered in Bermuda under the Insurance Act as a Class E insurer
in February 2018 and is now subject to the provisions of the Insurance Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. We have limited experience with regulation by the BMA and the MOF, including compliance with common reporting standard regulations imposed by the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, administered by the MOF, the jurisdiction's competent authority. Failure to comply with laws and regulations in Bermuda could subject us to monetary penalties imposed by the BMA and the MOF, increased regulatory supervision, unanticipated costs associated with remedying such failure or other claims, harm to our reputation and interruption of our operations, which may have a material adverse impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Additionally, as discussed in Item
1. Business – International Regulation – Bermuda, due to the Prudential Review, the BMA is requiring Citizens and CICA Ltd. to enter into a “Keepwell Agreement”, which would encumber certain assets of the Company. The Keepwell Agreement will include a specific target solvency level at which the Company would be required to make a capital injection into CICA Ltd. Both the Keepwell Agreement and any capital injection could negatively impact the Company’s capital resources and liquidity.
We and our domestic insurance subsidiaries
are subject to extensive governmental regulation in the U.S. which is subject to change and may increase our costs of doing business, restrict the conduct of our business, increase capital requirements for our insurance subsidiaries and negatively impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.
We and our domestic insurance subsidiaries are subject to extensive regulation and supervision in U.S. jurisdictions where we do business, including state insurance regulations and U.S. federal securities, tax, financial services, privacy, anti-money laundering, bank secrecy, anti-corruption and foreign asset control laws. Insurance company regulation is generally designed to protect the interests of policyholders,
with substantially lesser protections to shareholders of the regulated insurance companies. To that end, all the U.S. states in which we do business have insurance regulatory agencies with broad legal powers with respect to licensing companies to transact business;
mandating
capital and surplus requirements; regulating trade and claims practices; approving policy forms; restricting companies' ability to enter and exit markets; and restricting or prohibiting the payment of dividends by our subsidiaries to us.
The capacity for an insurance company's growth in premiums is partially a function of its required statutory surplus. Maintaining appropriate levels of statutory surplus, as measured by statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by a company's state of domicile, is considered important by all U.S. state insurance regulatory authorities. Failure to maintain required levels of statutory surplus could result in increased regulatory scrutiny and enforcement action by regulatory authorities.
Most
U.S. insurance regulatory authorities have broad discretion to grant, renew, suspend and revoke licenses and approvals, and could preclude or temporarily suspend us from carrying on some or all of our activities, including acquisitions of other insurance companies, require us to add capital to our insurance company subsidiaries, or fine us. If we are unable to maintain all required licenses and approvals, or if our insurance business is determined not to comply fully with the wide variety of applicable laws and regulations and their interpretations, including the USA Patriot Act, our revenues, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
FINANCIAL REGULATION AND RISKS
Our
financial condition and results of operations may be affected if the liabilities actually incurred differ, or if our estimates of those liabilities change, from the amounts we have reserved for in connection with missed tax reporting or noncompliance of some of our products with the Internal Revenue Code.
We have previously reported that a portion of the life insurance policies issued by our subsidiary insurance companies failed to qualify for the favorable U.S. federal income tax treatment afforded by Sections 7702/72(s) of the Internal Revenue Code ("IRC") of 1986. We have determined the structure of our policies sold to non-U.S. persons, which were novated to CICA Ltd. effective July 1, 2018, may have inadvertently generated U.S. source income over time, which caused tax withholding and information reporting requirements for the
Company under Chapters 3 and 4 of the IRC.
Accruals for loss contingencies are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The process of determining our best estimate and the estimated range for probable liabilities and expenses related to these tax issues was a complex undertaking including insight from external consultants and involved management’s judgment based upon a variety of factors known at the time. The amount of our liabilities and expenses depends on a number of uncertainties, including the number of prior tax years for which we may be liable to the IRS and the methodology applicable to the calculation of the tax liabilities for policies. Given the range of potential outcomes and the significant variables assumed in establishing our estimates, actual amounts incurred may exceed our reserve and could exceed
the high end of our estimated range of liabilities and expenses. To the extent the amount reserved by the Company is insufficient to meet the actual amount of our liabilities and expenses, or if our estimates of those liabilities and expenses change in the future, our financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected. See Note 7. Commitment and Contingencies in the notes to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of such tax issues.
Changes in accounting standards may adversely affect our reported results of operations and financial condition.
Our
consolidated financial statements are subject to the application of GAAP in the U.S. and Bermuda which are periodically revised and/or expanded. Accordingly, we are required to adopt new or revised accounting standards issued by recognized authoritative bodies, including the FASB, the BMA and the NAIC. Future accounting standards we adopt, including the FASB’s Accounting Standard Update related to long-duration insurance contracts, will change current accounting and disclosure requirements applicable to our consolidated financial statements. Such changes may have a material effect on our reported results of operations or financial condition. In addition, the required adoption of new accounting standards may result in significant incremental costs associated with initial implementation and ongoing compliance. See Note
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the notes to our consolidated financial statements contained herein for additional information regarding accounting updates.
Unexpected
losses in future reporting periods may require us to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets.
Under U.S. GAAP, we are required to evaluate our deferred tax assets ("DTA") quarterly for recoverability based on available evidence. This process involves management's judgment about assumptions, which are subject to change from period to period due to tax rate changes or variances between our projected operating performance and our actual results. Ultimately, future adjustments to the DTA valuation allowance, if any, will be determined based upon changes in the expected realization of the net deferred tax assets. The realization of the deferred tax assets depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income in either the carry back or carry forward periods under applicable tax law. Due to significant estimates utilized in establishing the valuation allowance and the
potential for changes in facts and circumstances, it is reasonably possible that we may be required to record a valuation allowance in future reporting periods. Such an adjustment could have a material adverse effect on our results of operation, financial condition and capital position.
APPROXIMATELY 25% OF OUR TOTAL REVENUES FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 CONSISTED OF INVESTMENT INCOME. THE INVESTMENT RETURN, OR YIELD, ON INVESTED ASSETS IS AN IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF OUR EARNINGS SINCE INSURANCE PRODUCTS ARE PRICED WITH THE ASSUMPTION THAT PREMIUMS RECEIVED CAN BE INVESTED FOR A PERIOD OF TIME BEFORE BENEFITS ARE PAID. CHANGES IN THE GLOBAL OR U.S. INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT, OR MARKET DISRUPTIONS THAT AFFECT INTEREST RATES AND INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES, AS WELL AS DECLINES IN THE VALUE OF OUR INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO, MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT
OUR RESULTS OF OPERATION AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.
Sustained periods of low interest rates in the long-term investment market may adversely affect our reported net investment income and the discount rates used in reserving for our insurance products, which may adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.
The low interest rate environment continues to limit increases in profit margins for insurers, including us. We have been impacted by the historically low interest rate environment over the past several years as our fixed maturity investment portfolio, primarily invested in callable securities, has generally been reinvested at lower yields, leading to lower net investment income than assumed in the pricing and reserving for our insurance products. An interest or discount rate is used in calculating reserves
for our insurance products. We set our reserve discount rate assumptions based on our current and expected future investment yield for assets supporting the reserves, considering current and expected future market conditions. Spread compression and related effects to profitability caused by lower interest rates affect the valuation of in-force business more significantly than the valuation of new business, as new business pricing assumptions reflect the current and anticipated future interest rate environment. Estimates of fair value are inherently uncertain and represent management’s reasonable expectations regarding future developments. If the discount rate assumed in our reserve calculations is higher than our future investment returns, our invested assets will not earn enough investment income to support our future benefit payments. In that case, we may be required to amortize any remaining DAC, record additional liabilities and/or increase our capital contributions
to our insurance subsidiaries in the period this occurs, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
Changes in market interest rates may significantly affect our profitability.
We are exposed to significant capital market risk related to changes in interest rates. Our investment performance, including yields and realization of gains and losses, may vary depending on economic and market conditions. Substantial and sustained changes, up or down, in market interest rate levels can materially affect the profitability of our products.
If interest rates decrease or remain at low levels, we may
be forced to reinvest proceeds from investments that have matured, prepaid, been sold, or called at lower yields, reducing our investment margin. We have experienced significant call activity on our fixed maturity portfolio over the years due to the low interest rate environment. Our fixed maturity bond portfolio is exposed to interest rate risk as approximately 50% of the portfolio is callable as of December 31, 2020, with 5% that could be called within the next year. If subject to increased call activity, the Company would have to reinvest the resulting investment portfolio cash proceeds from calls as well as from maturities in lower yielding instruments, further reducing our investment income. Some of our products, principally traditional whole life insurance with annuity riders, expose us to the risk that changes in interest rates
will reduce our
"spread," or the difference between the amounts we are required to pay under our contracts
to policyholders and the rate of return we are able to earn on our investments intended to support obligations under the contracts. As a key component of profitability, a narrowing of our “spread” may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Lowering our interest crediting rates can help offset decreases in investment margins on some of our products. However, our ability to lower these rates could be limited by competition or contractually guaranteed minimum rates and may not match the timing or magnitude of changes in asset yields.
An increase in interest rates will decrease the net unrealized gain position of our investment portfolio and may subject us to disintermediation risk. Disintermediation risk is the risk that in a change from a low
interest rate period to a significantly higher and increasing interest rate period, policyholders may surrender their policies or make early withdrawals to increase their returns, requiring us to liquidate investments in an unrealized loss position (i.e. the market value less the carrying value of the investments).
Our investment portfolio is subject to various risks that may result in realized investment losses. In particular, decreases in the fair value of fixed maturities may significantly reduce the value of our investments, and as a result, our financial condition may suffer.
We are subject to credit risk in our investment portfolio. Defaults by third parties in the payment or performance of their obligations under these securities could reduce our investment income and realized investment gains or result
in the recognition of investment losses. The value of our investments may be materially adversely affected by increases in interest rates, downgrades in the bonds included in our portfolio and by other factors that may result in the recognition of credit related allowances. Each of these events may cause us to reduce the carrying value of our investment portfolio.
In particular, at December 31, 2020, fixed maturities represented $1.5 billion or 91.7% of our total investments of $1.6 billion. The fair value of fixed maturities and the related investment income fluctuates depending on general economic and market conditions. The fair value of these investments generally increases or decreases in an inverse relationship with fluctuations in interest rates, while net investment income realized by us will generally increase or decrease in line
with changes in market interest rates. In addition, actual net investment income and/or cash flows from investments that carry prepayment risk, such as mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities, may differ from those anticipated at the time of investment as a result of interest rate fluctuations. An investment has prepayment risk when there is a risk that the timing of cash flows resulting from the repayment of principal might occur earlier than anticipated because of declining interest rates or later than anticipated because of rising interest rates. The impact of value fluctuations affects our consolidated financial statements, as all of our fixed maturities are classified as available-for-sale, with changes in fair value reflected in our stockholders' equity (accumulated other comprehensive income or loss). No similar adjustment is made for liabilities to reflect a change in interest rates. Therefore, interest rate fluctuations and economic conditions could
adversely affect our stockholders' equity, total comprehensive income and/or cash flows. Although at December 31, 2020, 98.5% of our fixed maturities were investment grade with 62.7% rated A or above, all of our fixed maturities are subject to credit risk. If any of the issuers of our fixed maturities suffer financial setbacks, the ratings on the fixed maturities could be downgraded (with a concurrent decrease in fair value) and, in a worst-case scenario, the issuer could default on its financial obligations. If the issuer defaults, we could have realized losses associated with the impairment of the securities.
The determination of valuation and impairments of our investments include estimations and assumptions that are subjective and prone to differing interpretations and could materially impact our results of operations or financial
condition.
The Company makes assumptions regarding the fair value and expected performance of its fixed maturity securities and other investments. Valuations may include inputs and assumptions that are less observable or require greater estimation, particularly during periods of market disruption, resulting in values which may be less than the value at which the investments may ultimately be sold. Further, rapidly changing and/or unprecedented credit and equity market conditions could materially impact the valuation of investments as reported in our consolidated financial statements, and the period to period changes in value could vary significantly. Decreases in value may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
The
decision of whether to record a credit impairment is determined by our assessment of the financial condition and prospects of a particular issuer, projections of future cash flows and recoverability as well as our ability and intent to hold the securities to recovery or maturity. We evaluate our investment portfolio for impairments. There can
be no assurance that we have accurately assessed the level of impairments taken. Additional impairments may need to be taken in the future, and historical trends may not be indicative of future impairments. Any event reducing the value of our securities other than on a temporary basis may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, or financial condition.
FROM TIME TO TIME, WE HAVE EXPANDED OUR BUSINESS BY PURCHASING OTHER INSURANCE COMPANIES OR BLOCKS OF BUSINESS. SUCH ACQUISITIONS SUBJECT US TO POTENTIAL RISKS THAT COULD MATERIALLY NEGATIVELY AFFECT OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OR FINANCIAL CONDITION.
We
may be required to recognize an impairment on the value of our goodwill, which would increase our expenses and materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Goodwill represents the excess of the amount paid by us to acquire various life insurance companies over the fair value of their net assets at the date of the acquisition. Under U.S. GAAP, we test the carrying value of goodwill for impairment at least annually at the "reporting unit" level, which is either an operating segment or a business that is one level below the operating segment. Goodwill is impaired if its carrying value exceeds its implied fair value. This may occur for various reasons, including changes in actual or expected earnings or cash flows of a reporting unit, changes in interest rates, generation of earnings by a reporting unit at a lower rate than similar businesses, declines in
market prices for publicly traded businesses similar to our reporting units or increases in the carrying value of the segment caused by recognition of uncertain tax benefits. If any portion of our goodwill becomes impaired, we would be required to recognize the amount of the impairment as a current-period expense, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Goodwill in our consolidated financial statements related to our Life Insurance segment was $12.6 million as of December 31, 2020.
Management’s determination of the fair value of each reporting unit incorporates multiple inputs including qualitative and quantitative factors such as discounted cash flow calculations based on assumptions that market participants would make in valuing the reporting unit. Other assumptions can include
levels of economic capital, future business growth, and earnings projections and trends.
We may be required to accelerate the costs of insurance acquired, which would increase our expenses and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
When we acquire a block of insurance policies, we assign a portion of the purchase price to the right to receive future net cash flows from existing insurance and investment contracts and policies. This intangible asset, called the cost of insurance acquired, or COIA, represents the actuarially estimated present value of future cash flows from the acquired policies. At December 31, 2020, we had $11.5 million of COIA.
We
amortize the value of this intangible asset in a manner similar to the amortization of DAC; it is subject to acceleration and generally depends upon anticipated profits from investments, surrender and other policy charges, mortality, morbidity, persistency and maintenance expense margins. If actual experience was not as expected when the policies were acquired, we might be required to accelerate the amortization of expenses we deferred in connection with the acquisition of the policy. We regularly review the quality of our COIA to determine if it is recoverable from future income. If these costs are not recoverable, the amount that is not recoverable is charged to expenses in the financial period in which we make this determination.
Unfavorable experience with regards to expected expenses, investment returns, surrender and other policy charges, mortality, morbidity, lapses or persistency
may cause us to increase the amortization of COIA, or to record a current period expense to increase benefit reserves, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
THE COMPANY RELIES ON OUR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, AND THE DATA MAINTAINED WITHIN THOSE SYSTEMS, TO MANAGE MANY ASPECTS OF OUR BUSINESS. CYBERSECURITY RISKS, THE FAILURE OF OUR SYSTEMS TO OPERATE PROPERLY AND/OR THE FAILURE TO MAINTAIN THE CONFIDENTIALITY, INTEGRITY, AND AVAILABILITY OF POLICYHOLDER AND CLAIMS DATA, INCLUDING PERSONAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION, COULD RESULT IN A MATERIALLY ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS, REPUTATION, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Our failure to maintain effective information systems could adversely affect our business.
We must maintain and enhance our existing information systems and develop and integrate new information systems to keep pace with continuing changes in information
processing technology, evolving industry and regulatory standards and changing customer preferences in a cost-effective manner. If we do not maintain adequate systems, we could experience adverse consequences, including inadequate information on which to base pricing, underwriting and reserve decisions, regulatory problems, failure to meet prompt payment obligations, increases in administrative expenses and loss of customers. Our failure to maintain effective and efficient information systems, or our failure to consolidate our existing systems could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Some of our information technology systems and software are mainframe-based, legacy-type systems that require an ongoing commitment of resources to maintain current standards. Our systems utilize proprietary code requiring highly skilled personnel. Due
to the unique nature of our proprietary operating environment, we could have difficulty finding personnel with the skills required to provide ongoing system maintenance and development as we seek to keep pace with changes in our products and business models, information processing technology, evolving industry and regulatory standards and policyholder needs.
We are continuously evaluating and enhancing systems and creating new systems and processes as our business depends on our ability to maintain and improve our technology. Due to the complexity and interconnectedness of our systems and processes, these changes, as well as changes designed to update and enhance our protective measures to address new threats, increase the risk of a system or process failure or the creation of a gap in our security measures. Any such failure or gap could adversely affect our business operations and
results of operations.
A cyber attack or other security breach could disrupt our operations, result in the unauthorized disclosure or loss of confidential data, damage our reputation or relationships, and expose us to significant financial and legal liability, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations, or financial condition.
We store confidential information about our business and our policyholders, independent marketing firms, and independent agents, consultants and others on our information technology systems, including proprietary and personally identifiable information. As part of our normal business operations, we use this information and engage third-party providers, including outsourcing, cloud computing, and other business partners, that store, access, process, and transmit such information
on our behalf. We devote significant resources and employ security measures to help protect our information technology systems and confidential information, and we have programs in place to detect, contain, and respond to information security incidents. However, because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and may be difficult to detect for long periods of time, we and our third-party providers may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative measures. In addition, hardware, software, or applications we develop or procure from third parties or through open source solutions may contain defects in design or manufacture or other problems that could unexpectedly compromise our information security. Unauthorized parties, whether within or outside our company, may disrupt or gain access
to our systems, or those of third parties with whom we do business, through human error, misfeasance, fraud, trickery, or other forms of deceit, including break-ins, use of stolen credentials, social engineering, phishing, or other cyber attacks, computer viruses, malicious codes, and similar means of unauthorized and destructive tampering.
We and our third-party providers experience information security incidents from time to time. There is no assurance that our security systems and measures will be able to prevent, mitigate, or remediate future incidents. A successful penetration or circumvention of the security of our information technology systems, or those of third parties with whom we do business, could cause serious negative consequences for us, including significant disruption of our operations, unauthorized disclosure or loss of confidential information, harm to our brand or
reputation, loss of customers and revenues, violations of privacy and other laws, and exposure to litigation, monetary damages, regulatory enforcement proceedings, fines, and potentially criminal proceedings and penalties. If we are unaware of the incident for some time after it occurs, our exposure could increase. In addition, the costs to address or remediate systems disruptions or security threats or vulnerabilities, whether before or after an incident, could be significant. As we continue to build our digital capabilities and focus on enhancing the customer experience, the amount of information that we retain and share with third parties is likely to grow, increasing the cost to prevent data security breaches and the cost and potential consequences of such breaches. An information technology systems
failure could also interfere with our ability to comply with financial reporting and other regulatory requirements, exposing us to potential disciplinary action by regulators.
Although we have insurance against some cyber risks and attacks,
we may be subject to litigation and financial losses that exceed our policy limits, are subject to deductibles or are not covered under any of our current insurance policies.
The failure of our business recovery and incident management processes to resume our business operations in the event of a catastrophe, cyber attack, or other event could adversely affect our profitability, results of operations, or financial condition.
In the event of a disaster such as a catastrophe, an epidemic, a cyber attack, cyber security breach or other information technology systems failure, a terrorist attack, or war, unanticipated problems with our disaster recovery systems could have a material adverse impact on our ability to conduct business and on our results of operations and financial condition, particularly if
those problems affect our information technology systems and destroy valuable data or result in a significant failure of our internal control environment. In addition, in the event that a significant number of our employees were unavailable in the event of a disaster, our ability to effectively conduct business could be severely compromised.
The failure of our information technology and/or disaster recovery systems for any reason could cause significant interruptions or malfunctions in our or our customers’ operations and result in the loss, theft, or failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data, including personal information relating to our customers. Such a failure could harm our reputation, subject us to regulatory sanctions, legal claims, and increased expenses, and lead to a loss of customers and revenues.
RISKS
RELATED TO OUR HOLDING SECURITIES
If our foreign policyholders reduced or ceased participation in our CISIP or if a foreign securities regulatory authority were to deem the CISIP's operation contrary to such country's securities laws, the volume of Class A common stock purchased on the open market through the CISIP, and the price of our Class A common stock, could fall.
A significant portion of our Class A common stock has been purchased under the CISIP by foreign holders of life insurance policies (or related brokers). The CISIP is registered with the SEC pursuant to a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, but is not registered under the laws of any foreign jurisdiction. If a foreign securities regulatory authority were to determine the offer and sale of our Class A common stock under the CISIP
was not allowed under applicable laws and regulations of its jurisdiction, such authority may issue or assert a fine, penalty or cease and desist order against our offer and sale of Class A common stock in that foreign jurisdiction. There is a risk our Class A common stock price could be negatively impacted by a decrease in participation in the CISIP. If fewer policyholders are eligible to or elect to participate in the CISIP, the trading volume of our Class A common stock may decline from its present levels, the demand for our Class A common stock could be negatively impacted and the price of our Class A common stock could fall.
Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws,
as well as applicable insurance laws in the jurisdictions where our insurance subsidiaries are domiciled, may discourage takeovers and business combinations that our shareholders might consider to be in their best interests.
Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws, as well as insurance laws in the jurisdictions in which our insurance subsidiaries are domiciled, may delay, deter, render more difficult or prevent a takeover attempt or a change in control that our shareholders might consider in their best
interests.As a result, our shareholders may be prevented from receiving the benefit from any premium to the market price of our Class A common stock that may be offered by a bidder in a takeover context or the Company may not be able to reissue the Class B common stock in order to provide capital to the Company.
The following provisions in our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws make it difficult for our Class A shareholders to replace or remove our directors and have other anti-takeover effects that may delay, deter or prevent a takeover attempt:
•holders of shares of our Class B common stock elect a simple majority of our Board, and
•our Board may issue one or more series of preferred stock without the
approval of our shareholders.
Insurance laws generally require prior approval of a change in control of an insurance company. Generally, such laws provide that control over an insurer is presumed to exist if any person, directly or indirectly, owns, controls, holds with the power to vote, or holds proxies representing 10% or more of the voting securities of the insurer. In considering an application to acquire control of an insurer, an insurance commissioner generally will consider such factors as the experience, competence and financial strength of the proposed acquirer, the integrity of the proposed acquirer's board of directors and executive officers, the proposed acquirer's plans for the management and operation of the insurer, and any anti-competitive results that may arise from the acquisition. These insurance requirements may delay, deter or prevent our ability to complete
an acquisition or sell the Class B common stock in order to raise capital.
GENERAL RISK FACTORS
Litigation and regulatory actions and investigations are common in our businesses and may result in financial losses and/or harm to our reputation.
From time to time we are, and have been, subject to a variety of legal and regulatory actions and investigations relating to our business operations. We are, and in the future may be, parties in various litigation matters. An adverse outcome in one or more of these actions, investigations or litigation matters may, depending on the nature, scope and amount of the ruling, materially and adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition, encourage other litigation, and limit
our ability to write new business, particularly if the adverse outcomes negatively impact our reputation.
In the absence of countervailing considerations, we would expect to defend any such actions, investigations or litigation matters vigorously. However, in doing so, we could incur significant defense costs, including attorneys' fees, other direct litigation costs and the expenditure of substantial amounts of management time that otherwise would be devoted to our business. Further, if we suffer an adverse judgment as a result of any claim, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Reinsurance may not be available or affordable, or reinsurers may be unwilling or unable to meet their obligations under our reinsurance contracts,
which may adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.
As part of our overall risk management and capital management strategies, we purchase reinsurance for certain risks underwritten by our various insurance subsidiaries. Market conditions beyond our control determine the availability and cost of reinsurance. Any decrease in the amount of reinsurance will increase our risk of loss and may impact the level of capital requirements for our insurance subsidiaries, and any increase in the cost of reinsurance will, absent a decrease in the amount of reinsurance, reduce our results of operations. Accordingly, we may be forced to incur additional expenses for reinsurance or may be unable to obtain sufficient
reinsurance on acceptable terms, which may adversely affect our ability to write future business, result in the assumption of more risk with respect to the policies we issue, and increase our capital requirements. The collectability of our reinsurance recoverable is primarily a function of the solvency of the individual reinsurers. We cannot provide assurance that our reinsurers will pay the reinsurance recoverable owed to us or that they will pay these recoverables on a timely basis. The insolvency of a reinsurer or the inability or unwillingness of a reinsurer to comply with the terms of a reinsurance contract may have an adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
Events that damage our reputation may adversely affect our business, results of operations, or financial condition.
There are many events which may harm our reputation, including, but not limited to, those discussed in this Item 1A regarding regulatory
investigations, legal proceedings, cyber or other information security incidents and disputes with our independent agents and consultants.
In addition, as an insurance company, we are paid to accept certain risks. Those who conduct our business, including executive officers and members of management, and to some extent, independent agents and consultants, do so in part by making decisions that involve exposing us to risk. These include decisions such as maintaining effective underwriting and pricing discipline, maintaining effective claim management and customer service performance, managing our investment portfolio, delivering effective technology solutions, complying with established sales practices, executing our capital management strategy, exiting a line of business and/or pursuing strategic growth initiatives, and other decisions. Although we have a risk management framework and
employ controls and procedures designed to monitor business decisions and prevent us from taking excessive risks or unintentionally failing to comply with internal policies and practices such that errors occur, there can be no assurance that these controls and procedures will be effective. If our employees and independent agents and consultants take excessive risks and/or fail to comply with internal policies and practices, the impact of those events may damage our market position and reputation.
Depending on the severity of the damage to our reputation, we may be unable to effectively compete for new products or retain our existing business, which could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition. Damage to our reputation may also hinder our ability to raise new capital and/or increase our cost of capital.
Item
1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
Item 2.PROPERTIES
We lease our principal office at the Domain in Austin, Texas to service all business entities and operations. We lease space for our office in Bermuda related to CICA Ltd. and in Louisiana, Arkansas and Mississippi related to our Home Service Insurance operations. We also own properties in Louisiana related to our Home Service Insurance operations and in Buchanan Dam, Texas used for our general business operations.
Item
3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The following are material pending legal proceedings in which we or any of our subsidiaries is a party or in which any of our or their property is the subject.
Trade Secret Suit filed by the Company against Former Executives, Citizens American Life, LLC and Citizens American Life, Inc. (collectively, “CALI”) and First Trinity.
As previously disclosed, on November 7, 2018, Citizens, CICA Ltd. and CICA filed a lawsuit in the District Court of Travis
County, Texas (the “District Court”) against (i) Randall Riley (“Riley”), a former Citizens executive and son of Citizens’ founder Harold E. Riley, (ii) CALI, copycat companies formed by Riley and (iii) Alexis Enrique Delgado, Carlos Nalsen Landa, Enrique Pinzon Ruiz, Johan Emilio Mikuski Silva and Esperanza Peralta de Delgado (collectively, the “Los Raudales Defendants,” and together with Riley and CALI, collectively the “Defendants”), former independent consultants of Citizens, for unfair competition, misappropriation of Citizens’ trade secrets, tortious interference with Citizens’ existing contracts with its independent consultants and, with respect to the Los Raudales Defendants, breach of their independent consultant contracts with Citizens. The lawsuit sought
(i) a declaration that Citizens had grounds to terminate the Los Raudales Defendants for cause under their independent consultant contracts with Citizens and that the Los Raudales Defendants are not entitled to future commissions under such contracts, (ii) injunctive relief, (iii) damages and (iv) attorneys’ fees and costs. Among other things, the suit alleges that Riley formed CALI and misappropriated trade secrets during the time he was employed by Citizens, in violation of his contractual and other duties to Citizens, and that the Los Raudales defendants breached their
independent consultant contracts with Citizens by inducing or attempting to induce other independent consultants to terminate or reduce service to Citizens and disclosing confidential information.
On January 25, 2019, the Defendants filed a motion to dismiss certain claims alleged in the suit, and on April
11, 2019, the District Court denied the Defendants’ motion in its entirety. On May 29, 2019, Citizens, CICA Ltd. and CICA filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to bar the Defendants from continuing to engage in unfair competition and misappropriation of Citizens’ trade secrets and tortious interference with Citizens’ existing contracts with its independent consultants. A hearing for the preliminary injunction was held on August 12, 2019. On August 13, 2019, the District Court denied the application for a temporary injunction, and on August 31, 2020, the Third Court of Appeals in Austin, Texas affirmed the District Court’s decision.
On
September 10, 2019, Citizens, CICA Ltd. and CICA filed an amended complaint and added additional defendants to the lawsuit, including (i) Michael P. Buchweitz, Jonathan M. Pollio, Jeffrey J. Wood and Steven A. Rekedal, former Citizens executives and employees and, in the case of Steven A. Rekedal, a former Citizens independent consultant, (ii) First Trinity Financial Corporation, and Trinity American, Inc. (collectively, “First Trinity”) and International Marketing Group S.A., LLC, entities that have founded a business on the exploitation of Citizens’ trade secrets and goodwill, and (iii) Gregg E. Zahn, a First Trinity executive. The amended complaint asserted additional claims for breach of contract, conspiracy and unjust enrichment. The lawsuit is currently in discovery and, depending on the District Court's scheduling in
light of the COVID-19 pandemic, is expected to proceed to trial in the second quarter of 2021.
Colorado Litigation filed by the Foundation against the Company and the Board.
On September 2, 2020, the Company and its eight directors, Christopher W. Clause, J.D. Davis, Jr., Gerald W. Shields, Frank A. Keating II, Terry S. Maness, E. Dean Gage, Robert B. Sloan, Jr. and Constance K. Weaver, were named as defendants in a lawsuit (the “Colorado
Litigation”) filed by the Foundation, which at the time was the sole holder of the Class B common stock of the Company, in the District Court of Arapahoe County of Colorado (the “Colorado Court”). The Foundation’s complaint requested: (i) a declaration by the Colorado Court that the Action by Written Consent of the Foundation (the “Written Consent”) to add director nominees to the Company’s board of directors ("Board"), which was delivered on August 13, 2020, was valid and enforceable; (ii) a declaration by the Colorado Court that the actions of the Board taken after the receipt of the Written Consent, including expanding the size of the Board and amending the Third Amended and Restated Bylaws
of the Company, was void and unenforceable; and (iii) immediate injunctive relief against the Board from taking certain actions outside the ordinary course of business. Additionally, the Foundation’s complaint requested: (i) the Company and the Board to indemnify the Foundation and its director nominees for any expenses incurred related to lawsuit; (ii) the existing Board members to reimburse the Company for any (A) Board fees received on or since August 13, 2020 and (B) reimbursements received for acquiring legal representation relating to the litigation; and (iii) the Colorado Court award the Foundation all fees and expenses incurred in pursuit of the litigation, including
attorney fees.
The Board believed the dispute between the parties was essentially whether the Foundation could unilaterally appoint members to the Board without regard to the process mandated in the Corporate Governance Guidelines of the Company, namely that the Board’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the "Committee") is responsible for identifying, recruiting, interviewing, vetting and recommending potential director candidates and evaluating their qualifications, independence, potential conflicts of interest and other important considerations. The Board believed the Foundation had to first engage the Committee and provide the Committee with a chance to assess the candidates’ qualifications in accordance with the criteria adopted by the Committee.
On
September 28, 2020, the Colorado Court entered a mutually agreed Status Quo Stipulation (the “Stipulation”). Pursuant to the Stipulation, the Board and its committees agreed not to direct or, to their knowledge after reasonable investigation, permit anyone on their or the Company’s behalf to take any significant action that is outside the ordinary course of business without the consent of the Foundation (each, a “Material Action”) until the Colorado Court made a determination on the merits or otherwise ruled on the Foundation’s motion for a preliminary injunction, if filed, whichever came first (the “Expiration Date”). Material Actions were outlined in the Stipulation and included, among other things: (i) creating or disbanding any committee of the Board or changing the composition of any such committee; (ii) forming
any subsidiary or entering into any partnership or joint venture; (iii) issuing any equity securities of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, other than as required pursuant to the Company’s Stock Investment Plan and pursuant to the vesting, settlement or exercise of equity-linked awards outstanding as of September 2, 2020; (iv) acquiring, encumbering, pledging, disposing of or otherwise transferring any assets,
properties or rights of the Company or its controlled affiliates with a value in excess of ten percent of total assets in each case or twenty percent of assets in the aggregate (excluding any assets of the Company’s insurance subsidiaries backing reserves); (v) entering
into any agreements involving a material change in the business operations of the Company; (vi) granting, providing or accelerating compensation payments or arrangements to any current or former employee, director, officer or other service provider, subject to certain exceptions; (vii) incurring, assuming, guaranteeing or otherwise becoming responsible for any debt in excess of ten percent of total liabilities (excluding contingent liabilities owed to any policyholders of insurance subsidiaries of the Company); (viii) authorizing, declaring or issuing any dividends or “poison pill” rights to the Company’s stockholders, officers,
or directors; (ix) amending, modifying or repealing Board committee charters or the Company’s core governing documents; and (x) entering into any transactions involving a change in control of the Company.
On December 7, 2020, the Company filed counterclaims and third-party claims in the Colorado Litigation against the Foundation and two of its officers / trustees, Charles W. Hott and Michael C. Hughes, alleging that Mr. Hughes and Mr. Hott, as trustees or officers of the Foundation, among other things: (i) defrauded state insurance regulators in order to seize control of the
Company, (ii) breached their fiduciary duties to all of the Company’s shareholders, and (iii) violated the Colorado Consumer Protection Act (collectively, the “Counterclaims”).
On February 6, 2021, Baylor University and Southwestern Theological Seminary, as the two sole charitable beneficiaries of the Foundation (the “Foundation Beneficiaries”), resolved their litigation with the Foundation in which they alleged that the Foundation trustees, including Mr. Hughes and Mr. Hott, breached their fiduciary duties to the Foundation and misused Foundation monies for personal benefit, including the filing of the Colorado Litigation (see below, “Texas Third-Party Litigation filed by the Foundation’s Beneficiaries against the Foundation”). As a result
of their settlement, Mr. Hughes and Mr. Hott were removed as trustees from the Foundation. The Foundation Beneficiaries, upon regaining control of the Foundation, entered into a Mutual Agreement for Compromise, Settlement and Release with the Company, its individual directors and the Foundation (the “Foundation Settlement Agreement”) to resolve the Colorado Litigation.
The Foundation Settlement Agreement, among other things, provided for the following terms:
•The Company, its directors and the Foundation dismissed, all claims at issue in the Colorado Litigation and the parties mutually released each other for conduct prior to
February 5, 2021;
•The Company agreed to: (a) restore its Board to its form as of August 12, 2020 consisting of a nine-seat Board comprised of four directors appointed by the Company's Class A common stockholders (Christopher W. Claus, J.D. Davis, Jr., Gerald W. Shields, and Frank A. Keating II), four directors appointed by the Company's Class B common stockholders (E. Dean Gage, Robert B.
Sloan, Terry S. Maness, and Constance K. Weaver (the "Class B directors:)), and one vacancy eligible to be filled by the holders of Class B common stock; and (b) restore the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws to the form in which they existed on August 12, 2020;
•The Foundation was obligated to cooperate with the Company in such restoration of the Board and take all steps necessary or requested by the Company, including withdrawal
of the Foundation Nominees who were previously submitted to the Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for review and consideration and approval of the restoration of the four Class B directors named above;
•While in possession of the Class B Shares, the Foundation was obligated to comply with certain director qualification standards and a nomination process when nominating individuals to serve on the Board, including: (a) not permitting the Foundation’s trustees or officers to serve as directors, officers, employees or agents of the Company; (b) engaging with the Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee when developing a
Class B director slate or filling vacancies in the Class B directorship and (c) communicating and coordinating with the Committee in developing a slate of Class B directors; and
•The Foundation would sell, and the Company would purchase, 100% of the Company’s Class B Shares from the Foundation.
On February 5, 2021, the Company also entered into a Mutual Agreement for Compromise, Settlement and Release with Michael C. Hughes, Charles W. Hott and David A. Boto as officers or trustees of the Foundation (the “Hughes-Hott-Boto Settlement
Agreement”). The Hughes-Hott-Boto Settlement Agreement settled all controversies between the parties thereto, including dismissal of the Counterclaims.
Texas
Third-Party Litigation filed by the Foundation’s Beneficiaries against the Foundation.
As previously disclosed, on September 8, 2020, the Foundation Beneficiaries filed a lawsuit in the 67th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas (the “Texas Court”) against the Foundation and its CEO/President, Michael C. Hughes alleging that the Foundation trustees, including Mr. Hughes and Mr. Hott, breached their fiduciary duties to the Foundation and misused Foundation monies for personal benefit, including filing the Colorado Litigation against the Company and its Board, in an attempt to seat themselves on the Company’s board. In December 2020, the Texas Attorney General intervened in
the Texas Third-Party Litigation on behalf of the Foundation Beneficiaries. On February 6, 2021, the parties to the Texas Third-Party Litigation entered into a settlement agreement to, among other things, dismiss the Texas Third-Party Litigation, cause the resignation of Mr. Hughes, Mr. Hott and Mr. Boto as trustees of the Foundation, and allow the Foundation Beneficiaries to appoint their own trustees to control the Foundation. Neither the Company nor any member of the Board was a party to the Texas Third-Party Litigation.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our Class A common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol CIA. All of our Class B common stock is owned by the Harold E. Riley Foundation and is not listed on an exchange; therefore, there is no public trading market for our Class B common stock.
The number of stockholders of record as of March 5, 2021 was as follows:
•Class A Common Stock - 49,559,040
•Class B Common
Stock - 1,001,714
We have never paid cash dividends on our Class A or B common stock and do not expect to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future, as it is our policy to retain earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business.
We did not purchase any of our equity securities during 2018, 2019 or 2020.
The following graph compares the change in the Company’s cumulative total stockholder return on its Class A common stock over a five-year period. The following graph assumes a $100 investment on December 31, 2015, and reinvestment of all dividends in each of the
Company’s common stock, the NYSE Composite and the NASDAQ Insurance Index. Note that historical stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K generally discusses 2020 and 2019 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2020 and 2019. Discussions of 2018 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2019 and 2018 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2019.
OVERVIEW
For over 45 years, we have been meeting the needs of our policyholders and their families by providing insurance products that provide both living and death benefits. Citizens conducts operations through its insurance subsidiaries, who provide benefits to residents in 31 U.S. states and more than 75 different countries. We specialize in offering primarily ordinary whole life insurance, endowment products and final expense insurance in niche markets where we believe we can achieve competitive advantages.
Beginning
in 2017, we endeavored to transform Citizens, setting the course for a sustainable future. We took clear and decisive actions to improve internal controls, remediate weaknesses in our financial and operational structures and redefine our culture. We assessed the strength of our people, products and operations. Based on clearly defined values and priorities, we made the hard decisions to recruit new talent, exit unprofitable or undesirable markets, realign our distributors and improve the profitability of our product offerings.
As an insurance provider, we collect premiums on an ongoing basis from our policyholders and invest the majority of the premiums to pay future benefits, including claims and surrenders and policyholder dividends. Accordingly, the Company derives its revenues principally from:
(1) life insurance premiums earned for insurance coverages provided to insureds in our two operating segments – Life Insurance and Home Services Insurance; and (2) net investment income. In addition to paying and reserving for insurance benefits that we pay to our policyholders, our expenses consist primarily of the costs of selling our insurance products (e.g., commissions, underwriting, marketing expenses), operating expenses and income taxes.
2020 Highlights
2020 was a challenging year. As the COVID-19 pandemic spread across the world and changed behavior and economic patterns, as described in Part I, Item 1. Business under “Strategic Initiatives”,
we focused on pivoting our business to a more virtual model while executing on our growth initiatives that build on our expertise. We did this while navigating through significant internal and external disruptions, uncertainties and challenges including a change in control, the resignation of our former chief executive officer and appointment of an interim chief executive officer, litigation in Colorado brought by the Foundation, as our former controlling shareholder, against the Company and our Board of Directors following the change in control, and the global pandemic. These topics are discussed in more detail under Part I. Item 1. Business and Part
I, Item 3. Legal Proceedings of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
During 2020, we reported a net loss of $11.0 million, compared to a net loss of $1.4 million in 2019. The increase in net loss in 2020 was primarily driven by $10.0 million of general expenses related to executive severance costs and professional fees incurred in connection with the change in control of the Company. Expenses related to the change in control in 2020 include (i) a severance payment of $8.8 million to a Rabbi Trust for the benefit of our former Chief Executive Officer, Geoffrey Kolander, following his resignation pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement and the Chief Executive Officer Separation of Service and Consulting Agreement dated July
29, 2020 (the “Separation and Consulting Agreement”), and (ii) $1.2 million of expenses related to the accelerated vesting of Mr. Kolander’s Restricted Stock Units following his resignation upon the change in control pursuant to his employment agreement and Separation and Consulting Agreement. Legal fees related to the litigation brought by the Foundation against the Company and its Board of Directors in Colorado also contributed to increased general expenses during 2020.
While our first-year premiums in the fourth quarter of 2020 in our Life Insurance segment were 75% higher than first year premiums in the third quarter of 2020 and 15% higher than first year premiums in the fourth quarter of 2019, premiums decreased by $9.0 million during 2020 as compared to 2019. We believe that our overall sales in the Life Insurance segment for 2020 were negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. First year premiums in our Home Service Insurance segment were also negatively impacted by the COVID-19
pandemic as we stopped our door-to-door selling for two months while we pivoted to more virtual selling methods. Our renewal premiums in the Life Insurance segment were negatively impacted by higher levels of surrenders, which we believe was due to not only an aging block of business (i.e., maturities and surrenders of products where the surrender charges are close to expiring or have expired) and our decision to cease issuing new policies in Brazil in 2017 (where we see many policies lapsing), but also by economic circumstances in Latin America.
As discussed above, insurance premiums and investment income are our primary sources of revenue.
•Insurance premiums declined 4.9% in 2020 compared to 2019, totaling $175.3 million and $184.3 million, respectively, driven by lower first year and renewal premiums in our Life Insurance segment.
•Net investment income increased 1.1% in 2020 compared to 2019, totaling $60.2 million and $59.5 million, respectively, driven by a growing asset base derived from cash flows from our insurance operations, which was partially offset by higher investment expenses from diversification of our investment portfolio into private equity investments. The average yield on our consolidated investment portfolio was 4.24% (annualized rate) for 2020 compared to
4.36% (annualized rate) for 2019, a decline of twelve basis points, as we faced a challenging investment environment for fixed maturity securities in 2020.
•Lower realized investment gains in 2020 were primarily a function of a recorded net gain in 2019 of $2.4 million net of real estate sales and impairment losses and $2.0 million of realized gains in 2019 related to tender offers for fixed maturity securities.
Benefits and Expenses Highlights
The primary use of our funds is payment of insurance benefits. Total insurance benefits paid or provided in 2020 increased by 1.3%, from $154.6 million in 2019, to $156.7 million in 2020. This expense consists primarily of the following:
•Claims
and surrender benefits, which increased 13.4% in 2020 compared to 2019. This increase was primarily due to an increase in surrender benefits and matured endowments in the Life Insurance segment, due primarily to the aging block of business and other economic circumstances.
•Increase in future policy benefit reserves, which decreased 28.3% in 2020 compared to 2019. Future policy benefit reserves decreased due to the lower in force block of business.
The other primary use of funds are the costs of selling our insurance products (e.g., commissions, underwriting, marketing expenses) and general expenses. These costs increased in 2020 primarily due to an increase in general expenses, which rose 10.8% in 2020 compared to 2019, driven by the change in control and executive severance expenses as described above. Our general
expenses in 2020 benefited from a $2.2 million reduction in our 7702 tax compliance best estimate liability from the estimate at year end 2019. The increase in general expenses was also offset by a reduction in costs directly related to the selling of our insurance products, including commissions and capitalization of deferred policy acquisition costs, which decreased in 2020 compared to 2019, as they are directly related to premium production, and primarily first year premium production, which declined in 2020.
ECONOMIC AND INSURANCE INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENTS
While it is difficult to quantify the full impact that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on our business and industry in 2020, as we have previously disclosed, our results of operations for the year ended December 31,
2020 were negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. and other countries where we do business. The
COVID-19 pandemic primarily negatively
impacted our product sales (and thus first year premium revenue), and our claims and surrender benefits. We describe throughout this discussion in more detail areas of our results in which we believe our business may have been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. As described above, we have implemented operational changes and sales practices to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business. Because the COVID-19 pandemic continues to cause quarantines, “stay-at-home” orders and similar mandates for many individuals and businesses requiring them to substantially restrict daily activities and to curtail or cease normal operations globally where we do business, and because of slower-than-expected implementation of COVID-19 vaccines and treatment therapies, we continue to foresee some adverse impact to near-term sales activity and premiums, especially in Latin America, as well as potential continued impact to claims, policy benefits, invested assets and
regulatory capital. We continue to closely monitor developments related to the COVID-19 pandemic to assess its impact on our future results and business. For an additional discussion of the potential impacts on our business from the COVID-19 pandemic, see Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Additionally, we continue to be impacted by the following significant economic issues and other developments impacting our business and industry, including the following:
•Sustained Low Interest Rate Environment. Market interest rates are a key driver of our results. Persistent low
interest rates are identified as a major threat for life insurance companies, given their rate-sensitive products and investments. The sustained low interest rate environment continues to limit increases in profit margins for life insurers by:
◦Reducing the spread between guaranteed interest rates credited to policyholders and interest earned on supporting assets;
◦Causing us to reinvest proceeds in lower yielding assets as our fixed maturity investment portfolio, which is primarily invested in callable securities, are called and must be reinvested;
◦Potentially requiring us to increase our reserves or trigger loss recognition events related to policy liabilities, accelerate amortization of DAC and COIA, and potentially impair intangible assets;
◦Making
our products less attractive (due to lower credited interest rates), resulting in lower sales; or
◦Changing policyholder behavior, including increasing surrender or withdrawal activity.
Although our investment strategy has not changed, the Company has attempted to mitigate the risk of the low interest rate environment by making new investments in securities of states, municipalities, essential services and corporate issuers as well as identifying investment opportunities in other asset classes such as private equity to increase our yields while maintaining a prudent risk profile for our overall portfolio.
•Aging population. According to data from the
United Nations, "World Population Prospects: the 2019 Revision", virtually every country in the world is experiencing growth in the number and proportion of older persons in their population. As an increasing percentage of the world population reaches retirement age, we believe there will be a greater need for age-related products and we will benefit from increased demand for living benefit products rather than death benefit products, as customers will require cash accumulation to pay expenses to meet their lifetime income needs. Our ordinary life products are designed to accumulate cash values to provide for living expenses in a policy owner's later years, while continuously providing a death benefit. However, as the population reaches retirement age, policyholders may decide to use their accumulated cash value for cash needed in retirement, thus increasing surrenders of long-term products.
•Availability
of Reinsurance. Reinsurance market dynamics including increased pricing, years of accumulating catastrophic losses, investment market losses and the significant losses expected from the fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic have led to a decline in the availability of reinsurance, tighter terms (such as, for example, pandemic exclusions) and/or increased reinsurance prices. While we currently cede a limited amount of our primary insurance business to reinsurers, we may find it difficult to obtain reinsurance in the future, forcing us to seek reinsurers who are more expensive to us. If we cannot obtain affordable reinsurance coverage, either our net exposures will increase or we will have to reduce our underwriting commitments.
•Technology Adoption. Innovation and digital development strategies continue to evolve and impact all industries, including the insurance industry. The COVID-19 pandemic has forced companies to virtualize their operations, almost overnight. It is critical that we embrace these changes for the benefit of our policyholders, agents, employees and stockholders.
•Global Operations. While
our management has extensive experience in writing life insurance policies for foreign residents, changes to foreign laws and regulations and their related application and increased enforcement efforts by foreign governments, along with currency controls affecting our foreign resident insureds, could adversely impact our revenues, results of operations and financial condition.
Our Operating Segments
Life Insurance. For over 45 years, CICA Life Insurance Company of America ("CICA") and its predecessors have issued U.S. dollar-denominated ordinary whole life insurance and endowment policies to non-U.S. residents. We completed a novation of all of the international policies issued by CICA to CICA Life Ltd. ("CICA Ltd."), our Bermuda-based insurer, effective July
1, 2018. We distribute our international insurance products through independent marketing organizations and their agents located in the countries in which our policyholders reside.
Endowment product sales are the primary driver of sales in this segment. The twenty-year endowment is our top selling product, followed by an endowment product that matures at age sixty-five.
Through the domestic market of our Life Insurance segment, we collect renewal premiums on ordinary whole life, credit life insurance, and final expense policies issued to middle- and lower-income families and individuals in certain markets in the Mountain West, Midwest and Southern U.S. As we discussed in Item
1. Business - Strategic Initiatives, we will introduce, beginning in Florida, our domestic products and distribution in early 2021. The majority of our current domestic revenues are generated by the policies of domestic life insurance companies we have acquired since 1987.
Home Service Insurance. We provide final expense ordinary and industrial life insurance to middle- and lower-income individuals in Louisiana, Mississippi and Arkansas. Our policies in this segment are sold and serviced through a home service marketing distribution system utilizing independent
agents who work on a route system to collect premiums and service policyholders, and through networks of funeral homes that collect premiums and provide personal policyholder service. To a much lesser extent, our Home Service Insurance segment also sells limited liability named-peril property policies covering dwellings and content.
A discussion of consolidated results is presented below, followed by a discussion of segment operations and financial results by segment.
Our insurance operations are the primary focus of the Company, as those operations generate most of our income. The total dollar amount of insurance issued, number of policies issued, and average face amounts of policies issued in 2020 and 2019 are shown below.
We
issued $354.2 million in insurance face amounts in 2020 as compared to $392.3 million in 2019. As discussed above, our first-year sales were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. We issued 28,339 new policies in 2020, as compared to 25,604 new policies in 2019. The increase was driven by policies issued by our Home Service Insurance segment, which have a significantly lower face value than policies issued in our Life Insurance segment.
The number of policies issued in the Life Insurance segment decreased 1.1% in 2020 compared to 2019. While the total number of new business applications for our Life Insurance segment decreased during 2020 compared to 2019, the number of applications progressively increased during the second half of the year. In the third quarter, new policies issued increased 53% from the second quarter while fourth quarter policies issued increased 36% from the third
quarter. The increase in applications was primarily due to enhancements to our business operations and sales practices to account for the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including sales promotions and campaigns, focused training on virtual selling and strategically prioritizing selling lower face amount policies, which typically have less stringent underwriting requirements and, in some cases, may not require the completion of medical tests, as many of our markets remain in lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Although applications increased during the third and fourth quarters, due to these enhancements, average policy face amount declined by 4.8% and the amount of insurance issued declined by 5.8% during 2020 compared to 2019 for the Life Insurance segment.
The number of policies issued in the Home Service Insurance segment increased 12.5% in 2020 compared to 2019. The increase
in new business applications in our Home Service segment was driven primarily by the introduction of a new sales campaign targeted at existing policyholders in the third quarter that emphasized higher volume selling at lower average face amounts. In doing so, we focused on sales of additional benefits for our existing policyholders, which have lower face values, thus leading to a 24.8% decline in average policy face values and a 15.4% decline in amount of insurance issued as compared to 2019. Despite the increase in policies issued in 2020, our Home Service Insurance segment continued to be negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. We had temporary office closures in Louisiana during the second and third quarters due to the COVID-19 pandemic and Hurricane Laura, and we also curtailed the sales of certain product offerings that require extensive person-to-person sales interaction due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Revenues are primarily generated from insurance premium revenues and investment income on invested assets.
Years
ended December 31, (In thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Revenues:
Premiums:
Life insurance
$
170,328
178,351
181,825
Accident
and health insurance
1,019
1,383
1,218
Property insurance
3,982
4,613
4,817
Net investment income
60,197
59,531
54,205
Realized
investment gains
1,502
5,249
108
Other income
1,828
1,418
1,833
Total
revenues
$
238,856
250,545
244,006
Premium Income. Premium income derived from life, accident and health, and property insurance sales decreased
4.9% during 2020 compared to 2019. The decrease in 2020 was driven primarily by a decline in renewal and first year premiums in our Life insurance segment as discussed in "2020 Highlights".
Years ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Premiums:
First
year
$
15,972
17,508
17,639
Renewal
159,357
166,839
170,221
Total premiums
$
175,329
184,347
187,860
As
discussed in “2020 Highlights”, we believe that our consolidated first year premium revenue was negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The decrease in renewal premiums in our Life Insurance segment resulted from a decline in our in force business in this segment over the past few years, which is due in part to changes we made to our products and distribution. Renewal premiums in our Home Services segment were strong but were negatively impacted by catastrophic reinsurance premiums paid in the second half of 2020, as described below.
Net Investment Income. Net investment income increased 1.1% to $60.2 million in 2020 compared to $59.5 million in 2019 driven by a growing asset base derived from cash flows from our insurance operations. The annualized yield decreased by twelve basis points in 2020 compared to 2019 as we continue to face a challenging
investment environment for fixed maturity assets, which account for the majority of our investment portfolio.
Net investment income performance is summarized as follows.
Years ended December 31, (In thousands, except for %)
2020
2019
2018
Net
investment income
$
60,197
59,531
54,205
Average invested assets, at amortized cost
1,420,129
1,365,036
1,300,755
Yield on average invested assets
4.24
%
4.36
%
4.17
%
The
sustained low interest rate environment of the past several years has required us to reinvest a portion of our portfolio at lower interest rates, which led to a lower portfolio yield in 2020. As part of the ongoing process of managing our portfolio and optimizing performance, we are continuing to identify and invest in new asset classes, including private equity.
Investment income from fixed maturity securities accounted for approximately 87.6% of total investment income for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 87.8% for 2019.
Years ended December 31,
(In
thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Gross investment income:
Fixed maturity securities
$
54,653
53,860
49,126
Equity
securities
816
662
722
Policy loans
6,605
6,451
6,210
Long-term investments
238
13
15
Other
97
374
409
Total
investment income
62,409
61,360
56,482
Less investment expenses
(2,212)
(1,829)
(2,277)
Net investment income
$
60,197
59,531
54,205
Investment
income from fixed maturity securities increased 1.5% in 2020 compared to 2019. We have strategically increased our exposure to both private and public equity this year to improve our overall investment performance, endeavoring to increase our portfolio yields in a prudent manner. In addition, the increase in the policy loans asset balance, which represents policyholders utilizing their accumulated policy cash value to pay for premiums, contributed to the increase in investment income for 2020.
Realized Gains (Losses) on Investments. Realized investment gains and losses are as follows:
Years
ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Realized investment gains (losses):
Sales, calls and maturities:
Fixed
maturity securities
$
(112)
1,927
1,792
Real estate
—
5,513
—
Property
and equipment
9
(48)
(80)
Other long-term investments
9
—
—
Realized investment gains (losses)
(94)
7,392
1,712
Change
in fair value of equity securities
1,596
962
(828)
Other-than-temporary impairments ("OTTI"):
Fixed maturity securities
—
—
(776)
Real
estate held for sale
—
(3,105)
—
Realized losses on OTTI
—
(3,105)
(776)
Net realized investment gains
$
1,502
5,249
108
In
2020, we recorded realized gains of $1.6 million primarily related to fair value changes in a preferred stock exchange traded fund investment owned at December 31, 2020. In 2019, we recognized a gain of $1.9 million related to the redemption of two fixed maturity securities. We also recorded a net realized gain of $2.4 million from Citizens-owned real estate transactions in 2019.
Capitalization of deferred policy acquisition costs
(20,475)
(22,255)
(22,695)
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs
27,439
28,268
34,235
Amortization
of cost of insurance acquired
1,816
1,546
2,458
Total benefits and expenses
$
251,173
244,800
242,004
Claims and Surrenders. Death
claim and surrender benefits are our primary use of cash. As noted in the table below, claims and surrenders increased 13.4% from $106.8 million in 2019 to $121.1 million in 2020.
•Death claim benefits increased 8.3% in 2020. The increase in
2020 was concentrated in our Home Service Insurance segment and we believe likely reflected increased mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic in our customer base in this segment. Mortality experience and COVID-19 impacts will continue to be closely monitored by the Company.
•Surrender benefits increased 11.2% in 2020. Surrender benefits represented less than 1.2% of total direct life insurance in force of $4.6 billion as of December 31, 2020. The increase in surrender benefits is primarily within our Life Insurance segment. A significant portion of surrender benefits relates to policies that have been in force and have little or no associated surrender charges.
•Matured endowment benefits increased
42.5% in 2020 compared to 2019. These increases were anticipated based upon the dates when our policy endowment contracts were sold and their expected maturities as set forth in their contracts.
•Property claim expenses increased 79.6% in 2020 compared to 2019 due to the three hurricanes that hit Louisiana in the second half of 2020.
Increase in Future Policy Benefit Reserves. The change in future policy benefit reserves decreased 28.3% in 2020 compared to 2019. Future policy benefit reserves decrease as our block of in force business decreases and thus the decline was driven largely by lower policyholder retention. In
2019, changes in actuarial valuation estimates associated with the conversion to a new actuarial valuation system also contributed $2.4 million to the decline.
Policyholder Dividends. Most of our Life Insurance segment's international policies contain guaranteed cash values and are participating (i.e., provide for cash dividends as apportioned by our Board of Directors). The policyowner has several options with regards to the policy dividends and annual premium benefits, which include, among other things, electing to receive cash, crediting such amounts towards the payment of premiums on the policy, leaving such amounts on deposit with the Company to accumulate at a defined interest rate or assigning them to a third-party which would allow for participation in the CISIP, as described
in Item 1 - Business - International Products. Policyholders' dividends decreased by 7.5% in 2020 as compared to 2019 due to a lower in force block of business and actions taken by the Company to reduce discretionary dividends on existing international policies in response to the sustained low interest rate environment.
Commissions. Commission expenses are a cost of acquiring business, as commissions are the primary compensation paid to our independent consultants and independent agents for selling our products. First year commission rates are higher than renewal commission rates. Commissions fluctuate directly in relation to sales and thus the decrease in commissions in 2020 as compared to 2019 was due to lower sales in 2020.
Other
General Expenses. Total general expenses increased 10.8% in 2020 compared to 2019 due primarily to change in control and severance expenses as described above, partially offset by a $2.2 million reduction in our 7702 compliance best estimate liability and decreases in audit and long-term incentive compensation expenses.
We perform an expense study on an annual basis, utilizing an enterprise-wide time study, and we adjust cost allocations among entities as needed based upon this review. Any allocation changes are reflected in the segment operations, but do not impact consolidated expenses.
Capitalization of DAC. Capitalized DAC was $20.5 million and $22.3 million in 2020 and 2019, respectively. Decreases in capitalized amounts are in line with the decreases noted in sales activity. These costs will vary based upon successful efforts related to newly issued policies and renewal business. Significantly lower amounts are capitalized related to renewal business in correlation with the lower commissions
paid on that business compared to first year business which has higher commission rates.
Amortization of DAC. Amortization of DAC totaled $27.4 million and $28.3 million in 2020 and 2019, respectively. Amortization of DAC is impacted by new business, persistency and the level of surrenders. Additionally, 2019 included $1.4 million of amortization associated with the conversion to a new actuarial valuation system.
Amortization of Cost of Insurance Acquired ("COIA"). Amortization of COIA increased in 2020 compared to 2019 due primarily to an update in our Home Service Insurance segment's expected earned rate assumptions used within annuity models that resulted in additional amortization of approximately $0.2 million in 2020.
Federal
Income Tax. Federal income tax benefit of $1.3 million in 2020 and federal income tax expense of $7.1 million in 2019 resulted in effective tax rates of 10.8% and 126.0%, respectively. Subsequent to the novation of all of the international policies issued by CICA to CICA Ltd., the earnings of CICA Ltd. are subject to Subpart F of the IRC and, therefore, are included in Citizens' taxable income. The Subpart F income inclusion generated $2.2 million of federal income tax expense in 2020, as compared to $5.9 million in 2019. The decrease in tax from Subpart F income was partially offset in 2019 and 2020 by foreign income tax rate differential of $1.6 million and $1.8 million, respectively. Differences between our effective tax rate and the statutory tax rate result from income and expense items that are treated differently for financial reporting and tax purposes. Refer to Note
9. Income Taxes in the notes to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
SEGMENT OPERATIONS
Our business is comprised of two operating business segments, as detailed below.
These segments are reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The Company evaluates profit and loss performance based on net income (loss) before federal income taxes for these segments.
Years
ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Income (loss) before federal income taxes:
Segments:
Life Insurance
$
9,894
11,795
12,085
Home
Service Insurance
(3,470)
1,181
(2,496)
Total Segments
6,424
12,976
9,589
Other Non-Insurance Enterprises
(18,741)
(7,231)
(7,587)
Total
income (loss) before federal income taxes
$
(12,317)
5,745
2,002
LIFE INSURANCE
Our Life Insurance segment primarily issues ordinary whole life insurance and endowment policies in U.S. dollar-denominated amounts to non-U.S. residents in more than 75 countries through almost 1,000 independent marketing consultants as of December 31, 2020.
Years
ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Revenue:
Premiums
$
129,202
137,666
141,146
Net
investment income
45,885
44,779
39,985
Realized investment gains, net
1,340
6,795
358
Other income
1,806
1,412
1,833
Total
revenue
178,233
190,652
183,322
Benefits and expenses:
Insurance benefits paid or provided:
Claims
and surrenders
93,813
82,964
69,149
Increase in future policy benefit reserves
25,825
39,873
43,671
Policyholders' dividends
5,554
6,004
6,316
Total
insurance benefits paid or provided
125,192
128,841
119,136
Commissions
17,944
20,128
20,079
Other general expenses
16,323
23,012
18,718
Capitalization
of deferred policy acquisition costs
(15,568)
(17,448)
(17,194)
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs
23,987
23,832
29,915
Amortization of cost of insurance acquired
460
492
583
Total
benefits and expenses
168,338
178,857
171,237
Income before income tax expense
$
9,895
11,795
12,085
Premiums. Premium revenues decreased by
6.1% in 2020 compared to 2019 as first year premiums decreased by 11.1%, while renewal premiums declined by 5.7%. While first year premiums declined sharply in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we experienced progressive improvement in our new business production for our international business during the second half of the year as described above and in the fourth quarter we experienced the highest level of first year sales over the last three years due to executing on our strategic initiatives.
Life Insurance premium breakout is detailed below.
Years ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Premiums:
First
year
$
10,397
11,692
11,451
Renewal
118,805
125,974
129,695
Total premium
$
129,202
137,666
141,146
92%
of our Life Insurance premium revenue in each of the past three years was generated by renewal premiums. The Company has taken actions over the past few years to pursue long-term growth and stability, including reducing discretionary dividends on existing international policies in response to the sustained low interest environment and making changes to our distribution, which has negatively impacted sales levels. These changes also included the discontinuance of new business in Brazil in April 2018, following the review of our international business model and regulatory risks. Brazil had been one of our top premium-producing countries in our international life insurance business for the prior several years. Finally, Venezuela, which has historically been one of our top premium-producing countries, has experienced prolonged economic and political turmoil, which has negatively impacted
our sales in the country, decreasing approximately 10% in each of 2020 and 2019. As discussed in Part I. Item 1, Business - Strategic Initiatives, we are beginning to implement on our growth strategies in the Life Insurance segment, by expanding our product offerings to the U.S. market.
Endowment sales represent a significant portion of our new business sales internationally and totaled approximately $8.6 million and $9.3 million, representing approximately 82.7% and 79.5% of total first year premiums in 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Most
of our life insurance policies contain a policy loan provision, which allows the policyholder to use the accumulated cash value of a policy to pay premiums. These accumulated cash values can also be taken as a cash loan from the policy at the request of the policyholder and are secured by the policy values. The policy loan asset balance increased 2.0% from 2019 to 2020 and remains at the same approximate ratio to life reserves as noted in prior years.
International Premiums. The following table sets forth, for our top five producing countries, our direct premiums from our international life insurance business for the periods indicated.
Years
ended December 31, (In thousands, except for %)
2020
2019
2018
Country:
Colombia
$
25,783
20.4
%
$
26,768
20.1
%
$
27,605
20.0
%
Venezuela
19,956
15.8
22,353
16.8
24,783
18.0
Taiwan
19,078
15.1
19,403
14.6
18,888
13.7
Ecuador
13,301
10.5
14,198
10.6
15,187
11.0
Argentina
9,175
7.3
10,069
7.6
9,953
7.2
Other
Non-U.S.
38,992
30.9
40,562
30.3
41,309
30.1
Total
$
126,285
100.0
%
$
133,353
100.0
%
$
137,725
100.0
%
Sales
from Colombia, Venezuela and Taiwan represented the majority of the new and renewal business premiums in 2020 and 2019. Overall, all of our top five countries listed above experienced a decline in premium levels from 2019 to 2020, with the biggest decrease occurring in Venezuela. As we discussed above, our in force business, in terms of policy counts and amount of in force insurance, has been declining for several years due to changes we made to our products and distribution over the last few years, which resulted in the pace of new policies issued lagging the number of policies terminated from death, surrender or lapse. We believe the economic uncertainty in Venezuela contributed to the larger decline in that country.
Domestic Premiums. Domestic premiums in our Life Insurance segment were $5.1 million in 2020, down from $6.2 million in 2019. We discontinued new sales
of domestic ordinary whole life and endowment life insurance products within our Life Insurance segment in 2017; therefore, the majority of the premium recorded in 2018, 2019 and 2020 is related to renewal business. We plan to expand our Life Insurance segment to the Hispanic market in the U.S and expect to begin selling in this market during 2021 as detailed above under Item 1 - Business - Strategic Initiatives.
Net Investment Income. Net investment income in our Life Insurance segment increased 2.5% in 2020 compared to 2019 due to continued growth in average invested assets. We experienced a decrease in portfolio yield of 13 basis points in this segment in 2020 compared to 2019 as we continue to face a challenging
investment environment for fixed maturity assets, which account for the majority of our investment portfolio. See the Investments section below for more detailed information on our investments.
Years ended December 31, (In thousands, except for %)
2020
2019
2018
Net
investment income
$
45,885
44,779
39,985
Average invested assets, at amortized cost
1,071,792
1,016,055
958,135
Annualized yield on average invested assets
4.28
%
4.41
%
4.17
%
Realized
Investment Gains, Net.The realized gain for 2020 was primarily due to the appreciation in the value of a preferred stock exchange traded fund purchased during the first quarter as we were able to take advantage of the market dislocation to identify an attractive risk-adjusted investment opportunity. Realized gains for 2019 were primarily due to a realized gain of $5.5 million during the first quarter of 2019 related to the sale of our former corporate headquarters in Austin, Texas and $1.3 million gain on fixed maturity redemptions above par.
Claims and Surrenders. A breakout of death claim and surrender benefits for the Life Insurance segment is detailed below.
Years
ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Claims and surrenders:
Death claim benefits
$
5,990
6,710
5,880
Surrender
benefits
52,218
46,062
38,187
Endowment benefits
11,016
12,233
13,329
Matured endowment benefits
20,965
14,601
8,548
Accident
and health benefits
149
128
229
Other policy benefits
3,475
3,230
2,976
Total claims and surrenders
$
93,813
82,964
69,149
78%
of our claims and surrender benefits in 2020 and 73% in 2019 were related to payment of surrender benefits and matured endowment benefits. Policy surrenders increased 13.4% in 2020 as compared to 2019 and matured endowment benefits increased by 43.6% in 2020. These expenses have been increasing over the last several years, which is expected, due to the aging of this block of business - a significant portion of surrenders relates to policies that have been in force and have little to no associated surrender charges and endowment products reaching their stated maturities. These charges are within expected levels.
The other key component of claims and surrender benefits is death claim benefits, which decreased 10.7% in 2020 compared to 2019. Mortality experience is closely monitored by the Company as a
key performance indicator and these amounts were within expected levels.
HOME SERVICE INSURANCE
We operate in the Home Service Insurance market through our subsidiaries Security Plan Life Insurance Company ("SPLIC"), Magnolia Guaranty Life Insurance Company ("MGLIC") and Security Plan Fire Insurance Company ("SPFIC"), and focus on the life insurance needs of the middle- and lower-income markets, primarily in Louisiana, Mississippi and Arkansas. Our policies are sold and serviced through a home service insurance marketing distribution system of 415 independent agents who work on a debit route system and through funeral homes that sell policies, collect premiums and service policyholders.
Our
Home Service Insurance products consist primarily of small face amount ordinary whole life and pre-need policies, which are designed to fund final expenses for the insured, primarily consisting of funeral and burial costs. To a much lesser extent, our Home Service Insurance segment sells limited-liability, named-peril property policies
covering dwellings and contents. We provide $30,000 maximum coverage on any one dwelling and contents, while content only coverage and dwelling only coverage are both limited to $20,000.
We provide final expense ordinary life insurance and annuity products primarily to middle- and lower-income individuals and families in Louisiana, Mississippi and Arkansas, a demographic that has been disproportionally impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Years
ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Revenue:
Premiums
$
46,128
46,681
46,714
Net
investment income
13,051
13,058
13,125
Realized investment gains (losses), net
223
1,470
(46)
Other income (loss)
19
4
(1)
Total
revenue
59,421
61,213
59,792
Benefits and expenses:
Insurance benefits paid or provided:
Claims
and surrenders
27,332
23,863
21,954
Increase in future policy benefit reserves
4,098
1,839
4,276
Policyholders' dividends
33
36
46
Total
insurance benefits paid or provided
31,463
25,738
26,276
Commissions
14,125
14,094
14,883
Other general expenses
17,402
19,517
20,435
Capitalization
of deferred policy acquisition costs
(4,907)
(4,807)
(5,501)
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs
3,452
4,436
4,320
Amortization of cost of insurance acquired
1,356
1,054
1,875
Total
benefits and expenses
62,891
60,032
62,288
Income (loss) before income tax expense
$
(3,470)
1,181
(2,496)
Premiums. First year premiums in this segment were negatively
impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and thus declined slightly in 2020 as compared to 2019. We had temporary office closures in Louisiana during the second and third quarters due to the COVID-19 pandemic and we have also had to curtail the sales of certain product offerings that require extensive person-to-person sales interaction. Premiums were also negatively affected due to three hurricanes in Louisiana during 2020 that increased reinsurance premiums paid to our reinsurers, which we net against premium revenue.
The following table sets forth our direct premiums by state for the periods indicated.
Claims and Surrenders. A breakout of death claim and surrender benefits for the Home Service Insurance segment is detailed below.
Years
ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Claims and surrenders:
Death claim benefits
$
21,205
18,390
16,718
Surrender
benefits
2,609
3,231
2,988
Endowment benefits
10
14
12
Matured endowment benefits
615
546
541
Property
claims
2,807
1,563
1,648
Accident and health benefits
70
104
31
Other policy benefits
16
15
16
Total
claims and surrenders
$
27,332
23,863
21,954
The majority of claims and surrender benefits in our Home Service Insurance segment relate to death claim benefits. Death claim benefits increased 15.3% in 2020 compared to 2019 due primarily to the COVID-19 pandemic and the average dollar amount of claims incurred. Mortality experience is closely monitored by the Company and can fluctuate based on reported claims as a key performance indicator.
The
other primary claims and surrender benefits were:
•Surrender benefits decreased in 2020 compared to 2019 but were within anticipated ranges based on management expectations.
•Property claims increased materially in 2020 compared to 2019. During the third quarter of 2020, SPFIC was impacted by Hurricane Laura, a Category 4 hurricane that caused significant damage in Louisiana. During the fourth quarter of 2020 SPFIC was also impacted by Hurricanes Delta and Zeta, both of which were Category 2 storms that also hit Louisiana. The Company has a reinsurance agreement that covers catastrophic events such as a hurricane. The reinsurance agreement specifies a maximum coverage per event of $11.0 million and a retention
level of $0.5 million per event. We have paid the $0.5 million retention in claim amounts for each of Hurricane Laura and Delta and do not believe we will exceed the maximum coverage; however, any claims in excess of $11.0 million would have to be paid by SPFIC. Hurricane Zeta has been a less significant storm and at this point, we do not expect the impact of this storm to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
OTHER NON-INSURANCE ENTERPRISES
Years
ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Income (loss) before income tax expense
(18,741)
(7,231)
(7,587)
This operating unit represents the administrative support entities to the insurance operations whose revenues are primarily intercompany and have been eliminated in consolidation
under U.S. GAAP, which typically results in a segment loss. Revenue in this operating unit consists primarily of net investment income and realized investment gains or losses, while expenses consist of other general expenses. The loss reported for 2020 was negatively impacted by the change in control costs described above, which contributed to the $19.9 million of other general expenses. The loss in 2019 was impacted by an impairment loss of $3.1 million in connection with reclassifying our Citizens Academy training facility located near Austin, Texas as real estate held for sale. This facility is no longer being used by the Company and is for sale.
Our investments are an integral part of our business success, as we invest the majority of premiums collected to pay for future benefits and rely on net investment income for our ongoing operations. The administration of our investment portfolio is handled by our management and a third-party investment manager, pursuant to Board-approved investment guidelines, with all trading activity approved by each board of Citizens and its insurance
subsidiaries. State insurance statutes prescribe the quality and percentage of the various types of investments that may be made by insurance companies and generally permit investment in qualified state, municipal, federal and foreign government obligations, high quality corporate bonds, preferred and common stock, mortgage loans and real estate within certain specified percentages. Our investment guidelines comply with the applicable statutes and require that fixed maturity securities, both government and corporate, are investment grade and comprise a majority of the investment portfolio. The assets are intended to mature in accordance with the average maturity of the insurance products and to provide the cash flow for our insurance company subsidiaries to meet their respective policyholder
obligations and operating expenses.
The following table shows the carrying value of our investments by investment category and cash and the percentage of each to total invested assets.
Years ended December 31,
(In thousands, except for %)
2020
%
2019
%
Cash
and invested assets:
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises
$
16,117
1.0
%
$
15,878
1.0
%
Corporate
877,208
52.8
650,088
42.6
Municipal
bonds (1)
409,665
24.7
536,284
35.1
Mortgage-backed (2)
140,184
8.5
131,387
8.6
Asset-backed
46,091
2.8
44,203
2.9
Foreign
governments
118
—
119
—
Total fixed maturity securities
1,489,383
89.8
1,377,959
90.2
Short-term
investments
—
—
1,301
0.1
Cash and cash equivalents
34,131
2.1
46,205
3.0
Other
investments:
Policy loans
83,318
5.0
82,005
5.4
Equity securities
22,102
1.3
16,033
1.1
Real
estate and other long-term investments
29,865
1.8
2,956
0.2
Total cash and invested assets
$
1,658,799
100.0
%
$
1,526,459
100.0
%
(1)
Includes $164.0 million and $188.1 million of securities guaranteed by third parties for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
(2) Includes $139.8 million and $130.1 million of U.S. Government agencies and government-sponsored enterprises for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
During 2020, we continued repositioning our portfolio into more diversified holdings as part of our investment management strategy. As investments matured or were called, the Company increased investments in corporate securities,
which now represent 52.8% of our cash and invested assets as of December 31, 2020 as compared to 42.6% at December 31, 2019. The Company has also decreased its exposure to the municipal bond market, which now represents 24.7% of the investment portfolio in 2020 compared to 35.1% in 2019.
Cash and cash equivalents decreased as of December 31, 2020 compared to December 31, 2019 due to timing of cash inflows and investments of cash into marketable securities.
Real estate and other long-term investments increased to $29.9 million as of December 31, 2020 as compared to $3 million as of December 31, 2019 primarily due to investments of $18.1 million in private equity funds and other
alternative investments and payment of $8.8 million to a Rabbi Trust for the benefit of Mr. Kolander representing the severance payments due to him under his employment agreement and Chief Executive Officer Separation of Service and Consulting Agreement in connection with his resignation following the change in control.
At December 31, 2020, investments in fixed maturity and equity securities were 91.1% of our total cash and invested assets. All of our fixed maturity securities were classified as available-for-sale at December 31, 2020 and 2019. We had no fixed maturity securities that were classified as trading securities at December 31, 2020 or 2019.
The
following table shows annualized investment yields by segment operations as of December 31 for each year presented.
Year
Life Insurance
Home Service Insurance
Consolidated
2020
4.28
%
4.37
%
4.24
%
2019
4.41
%
4.45
%
4.36
%
2018
4.17
%
4.52
%
4.17
%
Yields
on investment assets vary between segment operations due to different portfolio mixes and durations in the segments. Our annualized yield on average invested assets on the consolidated level decreased twelve basis points in 2020 compared to 2019, primarily driven by the Life Insurance segment.
Credit quality is an important feature of our investment guidelines for our fixed maturity securities. Credit ratings reported for the periods indicated are assigned by a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ("NRSRO") such as Moody’s Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch Ratings. A credit rating assigned by a NRSRO is a quality-based rating, with AAA representing the highest quality and D the lowest, with BBB and above being considered investment grade. If there is no NRSRO rating, the
Company may use credit ratings of the NAIC Securities Valuation Office ("SVO") as assigned. Securities rated by the SVO are grouped in the equivalent NRSRO category as stated by the SVO, and securities that are not rated by a NRSRO are included in the "other" category.
The following table shows the distribution of the credit ratings of our portfolio of fixed maturity securities by carrying value.
December
31, (In thousands, except for %)
2020
%
2019
%
AAA
$
31,990
2.1
%
$
56,977
4.1
%
AA
449,934
30.3
513,190
37.2
A
451,488
30.3
385,345
28.0
BBB
532,993
35.8
406,515
29.5
BB
and other
22,978
1.5
15,932
1.2
Totals
$
1,489,383
100.0
%
$
1,377,959
100.0
%
The
Company made new investments in investment grade bonds during 2020. Non-investment grade securities are the result of downgrades of issuers or securities acquired during acquisitions of companies, as the Company has not purchased below investment grade securities.
As of December 31, 2020, the Company held municipal fixed maturity securities that include third-party guarantees. Detailed below is a presentation by credit rating of our municipal holdings by funding type.
Municipal
fixed maturity securities shown including third-party guarantees
AAA
$
22,785
22,066
3,334
3,096
—
—
26,119
25,162
6.7
%
AA
66,897
62,227
129,071
120,231
12,479
10,787
208,447
193,245
51.2
A
16,909
15,221
130,463
117,694
5,184
4,419
152,556
137,334
36.4
BBB
4,273
4,169
11,491
11,062
1,592
1,450
17,356
16,681
4.4
BB
and other
4,509
4,432
678
608
—
—
5,187
5,040
1.3
Total
$
115,373
108,115
275,037
252,691
19,255
16,656
409,665
377,462
100.0
%
Municipal
fixed maturity securities shown excluding third-party guarantees
AAA
$
4,530
4,419
—
—
—
—
4,530
4,419
1.2
%
AA
45,779
44,235
46,048
42,602
7,839
6,542
99,666
93,379
24.7
A
30,432
28,169
164,915
149,742
8,156
7,146
203,503
185,057
49.0
BBB
9,232
8,642
34,177
32,316
—
—
43,409
40,958
10.9
BB
and other
25,400
22,650
29,897
28,031
3,260
2,968
58,557
53,649
14.2
Total
$
115,373
108,115
275,037
252,691
19,255
16,656
409,665
377,462
100.0
%
The
table below shows the categories in which the Company held investments in special revenue bonds that were greater than 10% of fair value based upon the Company's portfolio of fixed maturity securities at December 31, 2020.
(In
thousands, except for %)
Fair Value
Amortized Cost
% of Total Fair Value
Utilities
$
69,190
60,895
16.9
%
Education
71,766
66,174
17.5
%
The
Company's municipal holdings are spread across many states, however, municipal fixed maturity securities from Texas comprise the most significant concentration of the total municipal holdings portfolio as of December 31, 2020.
The Company holds 21.4% of its municipal holdings in Texas issuers as of December 31, 2020. There were no other states or individual issuer holdings that represented or exceeded 10% of the total municipal portfolio as of December 31, 2020.
General
Obligation
Special Revenue
Total
(In thousands)
Fair Value
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Amortized Cost
Texas securities including third-party guarantees
AAA
$
22,176
21,557
3,334
3,096
25,510
24,653
AA
23,009
22,554
14,092
13,067
37,101
35,621
A
—
—
22,334
21,855
22,334
21,855
BBB
—
—
1,977
1,828
1,977
1,828
BB
and other
—
—
559
508
559
508
Total
$
45,185
44,111
42,296
40,354
87,481
84,465
Texas
securities excluding third-party guarantees
AAA
$
4,530
4,419
—
—
4,530
4,419
AA
33,368
32,710
3,612
3,316
36,980
36,026
A
6,063
5,830
30,117
29,028
36,180
34,858
BBB
1,224
1,152
5,547
5,209
6,771
6,361
BB
and other
—
—
3,020
2,801
3,020
2,801
Total
$
45,185
44,111
42,296
40,354
87,481
84,465
IMPAIRMENT
CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO INVESTMENTS IN FIXED MATURITY AND EQUITY SECURITIES
Beginning January 1, 2020, in connection with the adoption of a new accounting standard, the Company assesses available-for-sale ("AFS") fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position for expected credit losses. See Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for a discussion regarding our application of this accounting standard in 2020. The Company recorded no credit losses on securities in 2020 or other-than-temporary impairments
("OTTI") on securities in 2019.
Gross unrealized losses on AFS fixed maturity securities amounted to $1.9 million as of December 31, 2020 and $1.6 million as of December 31, 2019. This increase in gross unrealized losses during 2020 was a result of the market disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Information on both unrealized and realized gains and losses by category is set forth in Note 2. Investments of the notes to our consolidated financial statements.
REINSURANCE
As
is customary among insurance companies, our insurance company subsidiaries reinsure, with other companies, portions of the life insurance risks they underwrite. A primary purpose of reinsurance agreements is to enable an insurance company to reduce the amount of risk by reinsuring the amount exceeding the maximum amount the insurance company is willing to retain. Even though a portion of the risk may be reinsured, our insurance company subsidiaries remain liable to perform all the obligations imposed by the policies issued by them and could be liable if their reinsurers were unable to meet their obligations under the reinsurance agreements.
We believe we have established appropriate reinsurance coverage based
upon our net retained insured liabilities compared to our surplus.
The effect of reinsurance on premiums is as follows.
Years
ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Direct premiums
$
178,952
187,009
191,561
Reinsurance assumed
91
99
99
Reinsurance
ceded
(3,714)
(2,761)
(3,800)
Net premiums
$
175,329
184,347
187,860
Our insurance subsidiaries monitor the solvency
of their reinsurers in seeking to minimize the risk of loss in the event of default by a reinsurer. The primary reinsurers of our insurance subsidiaries are large, well-capitalized entities.
The effect of reinsurance on life insurance in force is as follows.
Years ended December 31, (In
millions)
2020
2019
2018
Direct written life insurance in force
$
4,612
4,729
4,836
Reinsurance assumed
5
5
5
Reinsurance
ceded
(475)
(487)
(490)
Net life insurance in force
$
4,142
4,247
4,351
Virtually all of the Company's non-credit accident
and health insurance has been reinsured and is administered by Unified Life Insurance Company, an unaffiliated party.
The Company monitors the credit ratings of our life and property reinsurers. The ratings by A.M. Best Company range from B+ (Good) to A+ (Superior).
SPFIC generally carries first and second event catastrophe reinsurance coverage of $10.0 million per event and a retention level of $0.5 million per event. Thus, the first $0.5 million of incurred claims and any claims in excess of $10.0 million per event are SPFIC's responsibility. The reinsurance premium for catastrophe reinsurance was $1.4 million in 2020 and $0.8 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity refers to a company's ability to generate sufficient cash flows to meet the needs of its operations. In the year ended December 31, 2020, our operations provided $48.8 million in net cash. We manage our insurance operations as described herein in order to ensure that we have stable and reliable sources of cash flows to meet our obligations. We expect to meet our cash needs for the next 12 months with cash generated by our insurance operations and from our invested assets. Since the Company does not have any debt, the Company could seek a line of credit in order to provide additional liquidity at the holding company level if needed to provide
for longer-term or emergency cash needs.
PARENT COMPANY LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity is the ability to generate amounts of cash adequate to meet our cash needs. Citizens is a holding company and has had minimal operations of its own. Our assets consist of the capital stock of our subsidiaries, cash and investments. Our liquidity requirements are met primarily from two sources: cash generated from our operating subsidiaries and our invested assets. Our ability to obtain cash from our insurance subsidiaries depends primarily upon the
availability of statutorily permissible payments, including payments Citizens receives from service agreements with our life insurance subsidiaries and dividends from the subsidiaries. The ability to make payments to the holding company is limited by applicable laws and regulations of Bermuda and U.S. states of domicile which
subject insurance operations to significant regulatory restrictions. As discussed in Part I, Item 1, Business and Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors, these laws and regulations require, among other things, that our insurance subsidiaries maintain minimum solvency requirements, which limit the amount of dividends that can be paid to the holding company. The regulations also require approval of our service agreements with the
applicable regulatory authority in order to prevent insurance subsidiaries from moving large amounts of cash to the unregulated holding company.
As we discussed in "2020 Highlights", Citizens had significant expenses in 2020 related to executive severance costs due to severance payable to our former Chief Executive Officer following the change in control. These expenses included payment of $8.8 million to a Rabbi Trust for the benefit of Mr. Kolander representing the severance payments due to him under his employment agreement and Chief Executive Officer Separation of Service and Consulting Agreement in connection with his resignation following a change in control. During the third quarter of 2020, Citizens sold approximately $5.7 million of fixed maturity securities held in our investment
portfolio in order to fund a portion of the $8.8 million severance payment to the Rabbi Trust for the benefit of Mr. Kolander. The $8.8 million payment was paid to Mr. Kolander on February 8, 2021. We also incurred significant one-time expenses related to the build-out of our new headquarters in Austin, Texas and for the purchase of furniture and fixtures for the leased space.
Additionally, as discussed in Part I. Item 1. Business, on March 5, 2021, the Company paid $9.1 million to the Foundation to hold in escrow in order to purchase, upon obtaining final regulatory
approval, 100% of the outstanding Class B common stock.
We have been closely monitoring the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic may have on our liquidity and capital resources. To the extent that we continue to experience decreases in sales or collections of renewal premiums, increases in surrenders, decreases in our investment income and/or increases in claim payments as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic,
the liquidity of our insurance subsidiaries would be negatively impacted, inhibiting their ability to make dividends to the Company, and we may have to sell some of our investments to meet operational cash flow requirements.
INSURANCE COMPANY SUBSIDIARY LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The liquidity requirements of our insurance operations are primarily met by premium revenues, investment income and investment maturities. Primary cash needs are for payments of policy benefits to policyholders, investment purchases, and operating expenses. Historically, we have not had to liquidate investments to provide cash flow for our insurance operations and we did
not do so in 2020. We believe that we have adequate capital resources to support the liquidity requirements of our insurance operations if the cash flow from our insurance operations is insufficient to meet our cash needs. As discussed above, premium revenue was $175.3 million and $184.3 million in the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. See Contractual Obligations and Off-balance Sheet Arrangements below for a discussion of known and estimated cash needs related to payments of future policy benefits and policy claims.
Cash flows from operating activities were $48.8 million, $72.2 million and $84.6 million for the years ended
December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. We have traditionally also had significant cash flows from both scheduled and unscheduled investment security maturities, redemptions, and prepayments. These cash flows, for the most part, are reinvested in fixed income securities and to a lesser extent private equity funds or other alternative investments. However, during the third quarter of 2020, the Company used funds from matured securities to pay $6.0 million to the IRS for the tax compliance matter described in Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.
As noted in Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies, our payment does not represent closure of the matter or IRS acceptance of the tax liability shown on the submitted withholding tax returns, and the IRS reserves the right to revise our total tax liability for the covered period. Net cash outflows from investing activities totaled $61.8 million and $69.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The investing activities fluctuate from period to period due to timing of securities activities such as calls and maturities
and reinvestment of those funds.
Our investments consist of 91.7% of marketable fixed maturity securities classified
as available-for-sale and 1.4% of equity securities that could be readily converted to cash for liquidity needs. Over the last several years, a large portion of our fixed maturity security investment portfolio has matured, which required us to reinvest in fixed maturity securities with lower interest rates. We are seeking to diversify our portfolio with private equity investments in order to earn higher interest rates to mitigate the effect of a decrease in our spread between our policy liability crediting rates and our investment earned rates (our gross margin), which could also negatively impact our liquidity. Our investment portfolio (and, specifically, the valuations of investment assets we hold) has also been, and may continue to be, adversely affected as a result of market developments from the COVID-19 pandemic and uncertainty regarding its outcome. Moreover, changes in interest rates, reduced liquidity or a continued slowdown in the U.S. or in global economic
conditions may also adversely affect the values and cash flows of these assets.
Because claims and surrenders are our largest expense, a primary liquidity concern is the risk of an extraordinary level of early policyholder surrenders. We include provisions in our insurance policies, such as surrender charges, that help limit and discourage early withdrawals. Since these contractual withdrawals, as well as the level of surrenders experienced, have been largely consistent with our assumptions, our associated cash outflows for claims and surrender benefits historically have not had an adverse impact on our overall liquidity. Although we experienced an increase in surrenders in the Life Insurance segment during 2020 compared to 2019, we believe that such surrenders were not materially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. To the extent that we continue to experience an increase in surrenders
in our Life Insurance segment, whether due to the COVID-19 pandemic or otherwise, our liquidity could be negatively impacted. We continue to monitor surrenders and early withdrawals.
Our whole life and endowment products provide the policyholder with alternatives once the policy matures. The policyholder can choose to take a lump sum payout or leave the money on deposit at interest with the Company. As of December 31, 2020, 41% of the Company's total insurance in force was in endowment products. Approximately 13% of the endowments in force will mature in the next five years. Policyholder election behavior is unknown, but if policyholders elect lump sum distributions, the
Company could be exposed to liquidity risk in years of high maturities. Meeting these distributions could require the Company to sell securities at inopportune times to pay policyholder withdrawals. Alternatively, if the policyholders were to leave the money on deposit with the Company at interest, our profitability could be impacted if the product guaranteed rate is higher than the market rate we are earning on our investments. We currently anticipate that available liquidity sources, our capital resources and future cash flows will be adequate to meet our needs for funds, but we will monitor closely our policyholder behavior patterns.
For reasons previously discussed, we have experienced increased death claim benefits
in our Home Service Insurance segment in 2020 compared to 2019. Additionally, we are closely monitoring claim volumes to evaluate whether there is a delay in reporting or filing for benefits as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in our Home Service Insurance segment and Life Insurance segment. To the extent we continue to experience increased claims and the associated death benefit payouts in our Home Service Insurance segment and, possibly our Life Insurance segment, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, our liquidity could be negatively impacted. Some of our policies include pandemic exclusions, and we carry reinsurance to offset some of these risks. While our mortality experience is closely monitored by the Company and the activity has historically been within expected levels, we cannot predict whether we will see increased death benefit payouts above expected levels due to the COVID-19
pandemic. Cash flow projections and cash flow tests under various market interest rate scenarios are performed annually to assist in evaluating liquidity needs and adequacy.
As described above in "Home Service Insurance", we experienced substantial increases in property claims in the last half of 2020 due in large part to three hurricanes that hit Louisiana. As a result, Citizens had to contribute additional capital to SPFIC in order to maintain statutory capital requirements.
As discussed above, we are subject to regulatory capital requirements that could affect the Company’s ability to access capital from our insurance operations or cause the
Company to have to put additional cash in our wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Our domestic companies are subject to minimum capital requirements set by the NAIC in the form of risk-based capital ("RBC"). RBC considers the type of business written by an insurance company, the quality of its assets, and various other aspects of an insurance company's business to develop a minimum level of capital called "Authorized Control Level Risk-Based Capital". This level of capital is then compared to an adjusted statutory capital that
includes capital and surplus as reported under statutory accounting principles, plus certain investment reserves. Should the ratio of adjusted statutory capital to control level RBC fall below 200% for our domestic companies, a series of remedial actions by the affected company would be required. Additionally, we have a parental guarantee between Citizens and CICA, Citizens' wholly-owned subsidiary domiciled in Colorado, to maintain a RBC level above 350%. At December 31, 2020,
our domestic insurance subsidiaries were above the required minimum RBC levels.
CICA Ltd. is a Bermuda domiciled company. The BMA requires Bermuda insurers to maintain available statutory economic capital and surplus at a level equal to or in excess of the BMA's Enhanced Capital Requirement, which requires a certain Target Capital Level ("TCL"). As of December 31, 2020, CICA Ltd. was above the TCL threshold. However, as discussed in Part I. Item 1. Business – International Regulation – Bermuda, due to the
Prudential Review, the BMA is requiring Citizens and CICA Ltd. to enter into a “Keepwell Agreement”, which would encumber certain assets of the Company. The Keepwell Agreement will include a specific target solvency level at which the Company would be required to make a capital injection into CICA Ltd. Both the Keepwell Agreement and any capital injection could negatively impact the Company’s capital resources and liquidity.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We
have committed to the following contractual obligations as of December 31, 2020, with the payments due by the period indicated below:
(In thousands)
Total
Less
than 1 Year
1 to 3 Years
3 to 5 Years
More than 5 Years
Contractual Obligations:
Investment commitments
$
68,571
30,000
38,571
—
—
Real
estate and equipment leases
11,973
1,145
2,053
2,253
6,522
Future
policy benefit reserves:
Life insurance
1,246,423
22,561
77,937
128,601
1,017,324
Annuities
78,304
—
7
4
78,293
Accident
and health
761
107
396
8
250
Dividend accumulations
33,336
—
—
—
33,336
Premiums
paid in advance
40,605
930
3,239
5,383
31,053
Other policyholder funds
22,447
—
—
—
22,447
Total
policy liabilities
1,421,876
23,598
81,579
133,996
1,182,703
Policy claims payable:
Life
insurance
12,314
12,314
—
—
—
Accident and health
149
149
—
—
—
Casualty
743
743
—
—
—
Total
policy claims payable
13,206
13,206
—
—
—
Total purchase obligations
9,592
9,592
—
—
—
Total
contractual obligations
$
1,525,218
77,541
122,203
136,249
1,189,225
Future Policy Benefit Reserves and Policy Claims Payable. The payments related to the future policy benefits and
policy claims payable reflected in the table above have been projected utilizing assumptions based upon our historical experience and anticipated future experience. Payments of amounts related to annuity, dividend and other policyholder funds left on deposit are projected based on assumptions of policyholder withdrawal activity. Because the exact timing and amount of the ultimate policyholder fund obligation is subject to significant uncertainty, we have reflected the obligation at the amount of the liability presented on the consolidated balance sheet in the more than five-year category.
Real Estate and Equipment Leases. The Company entered into a long-term lease agreement with an unrelated party for its new home office in Austin, Texas and moved into its new home office in the first week of November 2020. Payments under this new long-term lease agreement average approximately $112,340 per month.
Total
Purchase Obligations. Total purchase obligations in the table above reflect primarily the $8.8 million held in the Rabbi Trust at December 31, 2020 for the severance payment made to Mr. Kolander in February 2021.
The Company does not have off-balance sheet arrangements at December 31, 2020 and does not expect any future effects on the Company's financial condition related to any such arrangements. We do not utilize special purpose entities as investment vehicles, nor are there any such entities in which we have an investment that engages in speculative activities of any nature, and we do not use such
investments to hedge our investment positions.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. Management considers an accounting estimate to be critical if: (1) it requires assumptions to be made that were uncertain at the time the estimate was made; and (2) changes in the estimate, or different estimates that could have been selected, could have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition. While we believe that our estimates, assumptions and judgments are reasonable, they are based on
information presently available. Changes in our assumptions, estimates or assessments as a result of unforeseen events or otherwise could have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Management has discussed the development and selection of its critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, and the Audit Committee has reviewed the disclosure presented below relating to them. See Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the notes to our consolidated financial statements for further information on our critical accounting policies.
VALUATION OF INVESTMENTS IN FIXED MATURITY SECURITIES
Based
upon current accounting guidance, investment securities must be classified as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale ("AFS") or trading. Management determines the appropriate classification at the time of purchase. The classification of securities is significant since it directly impacts the accounting for unrealized gains and losses on securities. Fixed maturity securities are classified as held-to-maturity and carried at amortized cost when management has the positive intent and the Company has the ability to hold the securities to maturity. Securities not classified as held-to-maturity are classified as AFS and are carried at fair value, with the unrealized holding gains and losses, net of tax, reported in other comprehensive income and do not affect earnings until realized. The Company currently
does not hold any fixed maturity securities classified as held-to-maturity.
The Company monitors all fixed maturity securities on an on-going basis relative to changes in credit ratings, market prices, earnings trends and financial performance, in addition to specific region or industry reviews. The Company evaluates whether a credit impairment exists for fixed maturity securities by considering primarily the following factors: (a) changes in the financial condition of the security's underlying collateral; (b) whether the issuer is current on contractually obligated interest and principal payments; (c) changes in the financial condition, credit rating and near-term prospects of the issuer; and (d) the payment structure
of the security. The Company's best estimate of expected future cash flows used to determine the credit loss amount is a quantitative and qualitative process. Quantitative review includes information received from third-party sources such as financial statements, pricing and rating changes, liquidity and other statistical information. Qualitative factors include judgments related to business strategies, economic impacts on the issuer, overall judgment related to estimates and industry factors as well as the Company's intent to sell the security, or if it is more likely than not that the Company would be required to sell a security before recovery of its amortized cost.
The
Company's best estimate of future cash flows involves assumptions including, but not limited to, various performance indicators, such as historical and projected default and recovery rates, credit ratings, and current delinquency rates. These assumptions require the use of significant management judgment and include the
probability
of issuer default and estimates regarding timing and amount of expected recoveries, which may include estimating the underlying collateral value. In addition, projections of expected future fixed maturity security cash flows may change based upon new information regarding the performance of the issuer. Any credit losses are presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down of AFS fixed maturity securities.
DEFERRED POLICY ACQUISITION COSTS
Acquisition costs, consisting of commissions and policy issuance, underwriting and agent convention expenses that are directly related to and vary with the successful production of new business are deferred. These deferred amounts, referred to as deferred policy acquisition costs ("DAC"), are recorded as an asset on the consolidated balance sheets and amortized to
income in a systematic manner, based on related contract revenues or gross profits as appropriate.
Traditional life insurance and accident and health insurance acquisition costs are amortized over the premium-paying period of the related policies using assumptions consistent with those used in computing future policy benefit liabilities. For universal life type contracts and investment contracts that include significant surrender charges or that yield significant revenues from sources other than the investment contract holders' funds,
the deferred contract acquisition cost amortization is matched to the recognition of gross profit. The effect on the DAC asset that would result from realization of unrealized gains or losses is recognized with an offset to accumulated other comprehensive income in consolidated stockholders' equity. If an internal replacement of insurance or investment contract modification substantially changes a contract as defined in current accounting guidance, then the DAC is written off immediately through income and any new deferrable costs associated with the new replacement are deferred. If a contract modification does
not substantially change the contract, the DAC amortization on the original contract will continue and any acquisition costs associated with the related modification are immediately expensed.
The ending DAC asset balance is calculated at a seriatim level for policies in force at the end of each reporting period based on the remaining unamortized asset. The assumptions used to calculate DAC are set when a policy is issued and do not change with changes in actual experience, unless a loss recognition event occurs. The seriatim method ensures that policies lapsed or surrendered during the reporting period are no longer included in the DAC calculation. This method limits the amount of deferred costs to its estimated
realizable value, provided actual experience is comparable to that contemplated in the locked-in assumptions.
Inherent in the capitalization and amortization of DAC are certain management judgments about what acquisition costs are deferred, the ending asset balance and the annual amortization. Approximately 93.3% of our capitalized DAC are attributed to first year and renewal excess commissions. The remaining 6.7% are attributed to other costs that vary with and are directly related to the successful acquisition of new insurance business. Those costs generally include costs related to the production, underwriting and issuance of new business.
DAC is subject to recoverability testing at the time of policy issuance and loss recognition testing on an annual basis, or when an event occurs that might require
loss recognition testing. If loss recognition or impairment is necessary, DAC would be written off to the extent that anticipated future premiums and investment income is insufficient to cover expected future policy benefits and expenses. Loss recognition testing considers, among other things, actual experience and projected future experience and calculates the available premium (gross premium less the benefit and expense portion of premium) for the next 50 years. DAC is evaluated for recoverability using best estimate assumptions related to interest rates, mortality and lapses. Based on the results of DAC recoverability and loss recognition testing, management believes that our DAC for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 is recorded at its estimated realizable value. However, if expenses or mortality increase
by 5% from our underlying assumptions or interest rates continue to decline, a loss recognition event could occur in our Home Service Insurance segment.
For DAC related to long-duration traditional insurance contracts, if the assets supporting the liabilities are in a net unrealized gain position at the balance sheet date, loss recognition testing assumptions are updated to exclude such gains from future cash flows by reflecting the impact of reinvestment rates on future yields. If a future loss is anticipated under this basis, any additional shortfall indicated by loss recognition tests is recognized as a reduction in accumulated other comprehensive income (shadow loss recognition). Similar to other loss recognition on long-duration insurance contracts,
such shortfall is first reflected as a reduction in DAC and secondly as an increase in
liabilities for future policy benefits. The change in these adjustments,
net of tax, is included with the change in net unrealized appreciation of investments that is credited or charged directly to other comprehensive income.
COST OF INSURANCE ACQUIRED
Cost of Insurance Acquired ("COIA") is established when we purchase a block of insurance. COIA is amortized over the emerging profit of the related policies using the same assumptions as were used in computing liabilities for future policy benefits. Inherent in the amortization of COIA are certain management judgments about the ending asset balance and the annual amortization. The key assumptions used are based upon interest, mortality and lapses at the time of purchase.
A recoverability test that considers, among other things, actual experience
and projected future experience is performed at least annually. These annual recoverability tests are based initially on an estimate of the available premium (gross premium less the benefit and expense portion of premium) for the next 50 years using best estimate assumptions related to interest rates, mortality and lapses. Management believes that our COIA is recoverable for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. This belief is based upon the analysis performed on estimated future results of the block and our annual recoverability testing.
GOODWILL
Current accounting guidance requires that goodwill balances be reviewed for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events occur or circumstances change
that would indicate a triggering event has occurred. A reporting unit is defined as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment. The Company's reporting units, for which goodwill has been allocated, are equivalent to the Company's operating segment, as there is no discrete financial information reviewed and analyzed by management for the separate components of the segment or all of the components of the segment have similar economic characteristics.
Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment exist. The goodwill testing requires us to compare the estimated fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value. If the carrying value of the
reporting unit is lower than its estimated fair value, no further evaluation is required. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, an impairment charge is recorded for that excess, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. We have the option of performing an assessment of certain qualitative factors to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value or proceeding directly to a quantitative impairment test. Management’s determination of the fair value of each reporting unit under the accounting guidance incorporates multiple inputs including discounted cash flow calculations based on assumptions that market participants would make in valuing the reporting unit. Other assumptions can include levels of economic capital, future business growth, discount rates and earnings projections. Spread compression and related effects to profitability
caused by lower interest rates affect the valuation of in force business more significantly than the valuation of new business, as new business pricing assumptions reflect the current and anticipated future interest rate environment. Estimates of fair value are inherently uncertain and represent management's reasonable expectations regarding future developments.
We performed our annual goodwill impairment test and the fair value was in excess of the segment's carrying value for the years ended 2020, 2019 or 2018. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had $12.6 million of goodwill allocated to the Life Insurance segment and the segment's fair value exceeded the carrying value by approximately 8%. We apply significant judgment when determining the estimated
fair value of our reporting unit. These judgements incorporate multiple inputs including discounted cash flow calculations based on assumptions that market participants would make in valuing the reporting unit, levels of economic capital, production levels and profitability of new business, pricing changes, spread compression, value of in force and earnings projections. Estimates of fair value are inherently uncertain and represent management’s reasonable expectations regarding future developments. Unfavorable changes to assumptions or factors that decrease the fair value and could result in future impairment include, but are not limited to, lower expectations for future sales, higher maintenance expenses, unfavorable mortality, higher discount rates and market-based inputs. Increases in the carrying value of the segment caused by recognition of uncertain tax benefits could also result in future impairment.
Future policy benefit reserves have been computed using the net level premium method with assumptions as to investment yields, dividends on participating business, mortality, lapses and withdrawals based upon our experience. The preparation
of consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of policy liabilities and the increase in future policy benefit reserves. Management's judgments and estimates for future policy benefit reserves provide for possible adverse deviation.
We continue to use the original assumptions (including a provision for the risk of adverse deviation) in subsequent periods to determine the changes in the liability for future policy benefits (the "lock-in concept”) unless a premium deficiency exists. Management monitors these assumptions and has determined that a premium deficiency did not exist as of December 31, 2020. Management believes that our policy liabilities and increase in future policy benefit reserves as of the years ended December 31,
2020, 2019 and 2018 are based upon assumptions, including a provision for the risk of adverse deviation, that do not warrant revision. Annually, the Company completes experience studies with respect to mortality, lapse, interest and expenses. The results of these studies are used for current year reserve adequacy testing, which includes loss recognition, goodwill, and establishing benefit liabilities and DAC for the following year's new issues.
CONTINGENCIES
An estimated loss from a contingency is accrued and charged to results of operations only if both of the following conditions are met:
1.Information
available prior to the issuance of the financial statements indicates that it is probable(virtual certainty is not required) that an asset has been impaired or a liability incurred as of the date of the financial statements; and
2.The amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
Reasonable estimation of a possible loss does not require estimating a single amount of the loss. It requires that a loss be accrued if it can be estimated within a range. If an amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount within the range, that amount is accrued. If no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, the minimum amount in the range is accrued.
A
gain contingency is an uncertain situation that will be resolved in the future, possibly resulting in a gain. We do not allow the recognition of a gain contingency prior to settlement of the underlying event. If we were to have a gain contingency, we would disclose it in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.
TAX ACCOUNTING
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates
is recognized in net income in the period in which the change is enacted. CICA Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Citizens, is considered a controlled foreign corporation for federal tax purposes. As a result, the insurance activity of CICA Ltd. is subject to Subpart F of the IRC and is included in Citizens taxable income on its US federal income tax return and due to the 0% enacted tax rate in Bermuda there are no deferred taxes recorded for CICA Ltd.'s temporary differences.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
GENERAL
The nature of our business exposes us to market risk relative to our invested assets and policy liabilities. Market risk is the risk of loss that may occur when changes in interest rates and public equity prices adversely affect the value of our invested assets. Interest rate risk is our primary market risk exposure. Substantial
and sustained increases or decreases in market interest rates can affect the fair value of our investments. The fair value of our fixed maturity portfolio generally increases when interest rates decrease and decreases when interest rates increase.
The following table summarizes net unrealized gains and losses as of the dates indicated.
Our exposure to interest rate changes results from our significant holdings of fixed maturity investments and policy loans, both of which comprised over 94.8% of our cash and investment portfolio as of December 31, 2020. These investments are mainly exposed to changes in U.S. Treasury rates. Our fixed maturity security investments include bonds issued by U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises, U.S. treasury bonds, securities issued by government agencies, state and municipal bonds, corporate bonds and other asset-backed securities. 27.5% of the fixed maturity securities at market value at December 31, 2020 were classified as state and political subdivisions, which are primarily municipal holdings. These holdings are diversified over several states with
21.4% of our state and municipal securities concentrated in Texas.
Changes in interest rates typically have a sizable effect on the fair value of our debt and equities securities. The interest rate of the ten-year U.S. Treasury bond decreased to 0.93% at December 31, 2020, from 1.92% at December 31, 2019. Net unrealized gains on fixed maturity securities totaled $167.9 million at December 31, 2020, compared to $84.1 million at December 31, 2019, based upon bond interest rates in relation to the U.S. ten-year Treasury yield.
To manage interest risk, we perform periodic projections of asset and liability
cash flows to evaluate the potential sensitivity of our investments and liabilities. We assess interest rate sensitivity on an annual basis with respect to our fixed maturity security investments using hypothetical test scenarios that assume either upward or downward shifts in the prevailing interest rates. The Company performed an analysis of fair value changes using assumed 100 basis point shifts in interest rates, noting that the fair value of our fixed maturity investment portfolio of $1.5 billion would decrease by approximately $142.9 million to a fair value of $1.3 billion upon a 100 basis point increase. The following table shows the effects on the fair values of our fixed maturity investments based upon these scenarios.
While the test scenarios are for illustrative purposes only and do not reflect our expectations regarding future interest rates or the performance of fixed-income markets, it is a near-term change that illustrates the potential impact of such events. Due to the composition of our book of insurance business, we believe it is
unlikely we would encounter large surrender activity due to an interest rate increase that would force us to dispose of our fixed maturity securities at a loss.
Our fixed maturity portfolio is exposed to call risk as a significant portion of the current holdings are callable. A decreasing interest rate environment can result in increased call activity as experienced over the past several years, and an increasing rate environment will likely result in securities being paid at their stated maturity.
There are no fixed maturity securities or other investments that we classify as trading instruments. All fixed maturity securities were classified as available-for-sale based upon fair value at December 31, 2020. At December 31,
2020 and 2019, we had no investments in derivative instruments or subprime loans.
MARKET RISKS RELATED TO EQUITY PRICES
Changes in the level or volatility of equity prices affect the value of equity securities we hold as investments. Our equity investments portfolio represented 1.4% of our total investments at December 31, 2020, with 70.3% invested in diversified equity and bond mutual funds.
Item
8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Reference is made to the consolidated financial statements, the notes thereto, and the report of our independent registered public accounting firm, as listed on the table of contents.
All other schedules have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information required is presented in the financial statements or the notes thereto filed elsewhere herein.
Item
9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
Item 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES [To be updated]
We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of December 31,
2020, the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2020.
(b) MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial
reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal
control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management evaluated the design and operating effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020 was effective.
Deloitte
& Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020. Their attestation report is included in Item 9A(c) of this Annual Report.
(c) ATTESTATION
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Citizens, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Citizens, Inc. and consolidated subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
("COSO"). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020, of the Company and our report dated March 10, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company
in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition
and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may
(d) CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
The information in this Part III indicated below is incorporated by reference from other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or from our definitive proxy statement pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K. We plan to file our definitive proxy statement for our 2021 annual meeting of shareholders within 120 days after December 31, 2020.
Item 10. DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Item 10 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K incorporates by reference the information in the sections entitled "Corporate Governance,""Audit Matters,""Directors" and "Executive Officers" in our Proxy Statement.
Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Item 11 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K incorporates by reference the information in the sections entitled "Directors - Director Compensation,""Executive Compensation" and "Corporate Governance - Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" in our Proxy Statement.
Item 12. SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K incorporates by reference the information in the sections entitled "Security Ownership of Directors and Management" and "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners" in our Proxy Statement.
SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The following table sets forth information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plan, the Citizens, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2020. See Note
11. Stock Compensation in the notes to our consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding our Omnibus Incentive Plan.
Plan Category
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding
options, warrants and rights
Number of securities remaining for future issuance under equity compensation plans
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
189,300
$
6.03
2,561,836
Equity compensation
plans not approved by security holders
—
—
—
Total
189,300
$
6.03
2,561,836
Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Item
13 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K incorporates by reference the information in the sections entitled "Corporate Governance - Director Independence" and "Corporate Governance - Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions" in our Proxy Statement.
The financial statements and schedules listed on the following
index to financial statements and financial statement schedules are filed under Item 8 as part of this Form 10-K.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
Page Reference
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
All other schedules have been omitted because the required information is inapplicable or the information
required is presented in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto filed elsewhere herein.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Citizens, Inc.
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Citizens, Inc. and consolidated subsidiaries
(the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes and the schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 10, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion on the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical
Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Future Policy Benefit Reserves and Amortization of Deferred Policy Acquisition
Costs for Life Insurance Contracts — Refer to Notes 1 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company’s management sets assumptions used in (1) recording a liability for policy benefit payments that will be made in the future (future policy benefit reserves), (2) amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, (3)
deferred policy acquisition costs recoverability testing and (4) loss recognition testing. The most significant assumptions include mortality, lapse and interest rate. Assumptions are based upon the Company’s experience, modified as necessary to reflect anticipated trends and to include provisions for possible adverse deviations. Management’s estimate of future policy benefits for life insurance contracts
was $1.25 billion as of December 31, 2020. Total amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs for life insurance contracts was $24 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Given the inherent uncertainty in selecting the mortality, lapse and interest rate assumptions and sensitivity of these significant assumptions, auditing the development of such assumptions involved especially subjective judgment and the involvement of our actuarial specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our
audit procedures related to management’s judgments regarding the mortality, lapse and interest rate assumptions used in the development of future policy benefit reserves, the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, and performing annual deferred policy acquisition costs recoverability testing and loss recognition testing included the following, among others:
•We tested the operating effectiveness of the Company’s controls over the assumption development process, the valuation of future policy benefit reserves and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs.
•We tested the underlying data of management’s experience studies used in the development of the assumptions.
•With
the assistance of our actuarial specialists, we evaluated management’s selected actuarial assumptions, including consideration of management’s process, methodologies and judgments used to develop the assumptions.
•With the assistance of our actuarial specialists, we evaluated whether the assumptions used for future policy benefit reserves and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs calculations were consistent with assumptions determined by management in their experience studies and assumption setting process.
•With the assistance of our actuarial specialists, we evaluated loss recognition and deferred policy acquisition costs recoverability projections for consistency with assumptions determined by management in their experience studies and assumption setting process.
Goodwill
— Refer to Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company’s evaluation of goodwill for impairment involves the comparison of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. The Company’s determination of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit incorporates significant judgments, including discounted cash flow calculations based on assumptions that market participants would make in valuing the reporting unit, including discount rate and projections of production levels and profitability of new business. Changes in these assumptions could have an impact on either the
fair value, the amount of any goodwill impairment charge, or both. The goodwill balance was $12.6 million as of December 31, 2020, all of which was allocated to the Life Insurance segment reporting unit. The fair value of the Life Insurance segment exceeded its carrying value by 8% as of the measurement date and, therefore, no impairment was recognized.
Given the significant judgments made by management to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit, and the difference between its fair value and carrying value, performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management’s estimates and assumptions related to selection of the discount rate and projections of production levels and profitability of new business required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our
fair value specialists and actuarial specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our
audit procedures performed to evaluate the reasonableness of management’s estimates and assumptions related to the discount rate and production levels and profitability of new business used by management to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit, included the following, among others:
•We tested the operating effectiveness of the Company’s controls related to its goodwill impairment assessment, including controls related to management’s selection of the discount rate and projections of production levels and profitability of new business.
•With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the discount rate, which included developing a range of independent estimates of discount rate assumptions
and comparing those to the discount rate selected by management.
•We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s projections of production levels and profitability of new business by comparing the projections to internal communications to management and the Board of Directors and sales targets included in compensation plans approved by the Board of Directors.
•With the assistance of our actuarial specialists, we evaluated whether mortality, lapse and interest rate assumptions used in the projections of production levels and profitability of new business were consistent with assumptions determined by management in their experience studies and assumption setting process.
•We tested the underlying data used in the discounted cash flow calculations and the mathematical
accuracy of the discounted cash flow calculations.
December 31, continued (In thousands, except share amounts)
2020
2019
Liabilities
and Stockholders' Equity
Liabilities:
Policy liabilities:
Future policy benefit reserves:
Life insurance
$
i1,246,423
i1,218,757
Annuities
i78,304
i76,380
Accident
and health
i761
i1,031
Dividend
accumulations
i33,336
i29,211
Premiums
paid in advance
i40,605
i43,102
Policy
claims payable
i13,206
i8,059
Other
policyholders' funds
i22,447
i18,192
Total
policy liabilities
i1,435,082
i1,394,732
Commissions
payable
i2,572
i2,514
Deferred
federal income tax liability, net
i9,564
i12,428
Current
federal income tax payable
i43,916
i44,622
Payable
for securities in process of settlement
i5,265
i—
Other
liabilities
i46,076
i30,804
Total
liabilities
i1,542,475
i1,485,100
Commitments
and contingencies (Notes 5 and 7)
i
i
Stockholders' Equity:
Common
stock:
Class A, iino/
par value, ii100,000,000/ shares authorized,
ii52,654,016/ and ii52,364,993/
shares issued and outstanding in 2020 and 2019, respectively, including shares in treasury of ii3,135,738/
in 2020 and 2019
i262,869
i261,515
Class
B, iino/ par value, ii2,000,000/
shares authorized, iiii1,001,714///
shares issued and outstanding in 2020 and 2019
i3,184
i3,184
Accumulated
deficit
(i82,352)
(i70,969)
Accumulated
other comprehensive income:
Net unrealized gains on fixed maturity securities, net of tax
i128,255
i77,117
Treasury
stock, at cost
(i11,011)
(i11,011)
Total
stockholders' equity
i300,945
i259,836
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
$
i1,843,420
i1,744,936
See
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
i904
(i2,165)
(i58)
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(i12,074)
i713
(i572)
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
i46,205
i45,492
i46,064
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of year
$
i34,131
i46,205
i45,492
Supplemental
Disclosure of Operating Activities:
Cash paid during the year for income taxes
$
i—
i2,200
i2,510
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
During 2020, 2019 and 2018, various fixed maturity issuers exchanged securities with book values of $i9.1 million, $i16.8
million and $i2.5 million, respectively, for securities of equal value.
The Company recognized right-of-use assets of $i12.0
million in exchange for new operating lease liabilities during 2020. The Company accrued purchases of property and equipment of $i0.8 million as of December 31, 2020, which is reflected in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and recorded iinone/
as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Citizens, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP").
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of Citizens, Inc. ("Citizens" or the "Company"), a Colorado corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, CICA Life Insurance Company of America ("CICA"), CICA Life Ltd. ("CICA Ltd."), Citizens National Life Insurance Company ("CNLIC"), Security Plan Life Insurance Company ("SPLIC"),
Security Plan Fire Insurance Company ("SPFIC"), Magnolia Guaranty Life Insurance Company ("MGLIC"), and Computing Technology, Inc. ("CTI"). All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Citizens and its wholly-owned subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the "Company,""we,""us," or "our".
Our Life Insurance segment operates through CICA Ltd., CICA and CNLIC. Our international life insurance business, which operates through CICA Ltd., issues U.S. dollar-denominated endowment contracts internationally, which are principally accumulation contracts
that incorporate an element of life insurance protection and ordinary whole life insurance in U.S. dollar-denominated amounts sold to non-U.S. residents. These contracts are designed to provide a fixed amount of insurance coverage over the life of the insured and may utilize rider benefits to provide additional increasing or decreasing coverage and annuity benefits to enhance accumulations. Our domestic life insurance business, which operates through CICA and CNLIC, primarily focused on living needs and provided benefits toward accumulating financial benefits for the policyowners throughout the Midwest and southern U.S. until they ceased most domestic sales beginning January 1, 2017.
Our Home Service Insurance segment operates through our subsidiaries
SPLIC, MGLIC and SPFIC, and focuses on the life insurance needs of the middle- and lower-income markets, primarily in Louisiana, Mississippi and Arkansas. Our products in this segment consist primarily of small face amount ordinary whole life, industrial life and pre-need policies, which are designed to fund final expenses for the insured, primarily consisting of funeral and burial costs as well as limited liability, named peril property policies covering dwelling and contents.
CTI provides data processing systems and services to the Company.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
INVESTMENTS
i
Investment
securities are classified as held-to-maturity ("HTM"), available-for-sale ("AFS") or trading. Management determines the appropriate classification at the time of purchase. The classification of securities is significant since it directly impacts the accounting for unrealized gains and losses on securities. Fixed maturity securities are classified as HTM and carried at amortized cost when management has the positive intent and the Company has the ability to hold the securities to maturity. Securities not classified as HTM are classified as AFS and are carried at fair value, with the unrealized holding gains and losses, net of tax, reported in other comprehensive income and are not reported in earnings until realized. Fixed maturity securities consist primarily of bonds classified as AFS or HTM. The
Company does not classify any fixed maturity securities as trading and, beginning September 30, 2018, the Company no longer classifies any fixed maturity securities as HTM. Equity securities are measured at fair value beginning January 1, 2018, with the change in fair value recorded through net income. Prior to 2018, changes in equity security fair values were a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.
Unrealized gains (losses) of fixed maturity securities held as AFS are shown as a separate component of stockholders' equity, net of tax, and is a separate component of comprehensive income.
Beginning January
1, 2020 in connection with the adoption of a new accounting standard, the Company assesses AFS fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position for expected credit losses. First, we assess whether we intend to sell, or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell, the security before recovery of its amortized cost. If either of the criteria is met, the security's amortized cost is written down to its fair value. For AFS fixed maturity securities that do not meet either criteria, we evaluate whether the decline in fair value has resulted from credit losses or other factors. In making this assessment, management considers the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, any changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency, and adverse conditions specifically related to the security, among other factors. If management deems a credit loss
has occurred, the impairment is recorded through an allowance for credit losses rather than as a write-down. Changes in the allowance for credit losses are recorded through realized investment gains and losses. Any impairment that has not been recorded through an allowance for credit losses is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income on our consolidated balance sheets. Prior to 2020, the Company evaluated all fixed maturity securities on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic conditions warranted additional evaluations, to determine if a write-down should be recorded due to an other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI"). If an OTTI was required, the write-down was recorded directly to operations and any subsequent recoveries were recorded through net investment income over the remaining life of the security.
The
Company made a policy election to exclude accrued interest from the amortized cost of AFS fixed maturity securities and report accrued interest separately in accrued investment income in the consolidated balance sheets. AFS fixed maturity securities are placed on non-accrual status when we no longer expect to receive all contractual amounts due. Accrued interest receivable is reversed against interest income when a security is placed on non-accrual status. Accordingly, we do not recognize an allowance for credit loss against accrued interest receivable.
Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted over the life of the related security as an adjustment to yield using the effective interest method. Dividend and interest income are recognized when earned. Realized gains and losses are included in earnings and are derived using the specific identification method for determining the cost
of securities sold.
The Company from time to time may dispose of an impaired security in response to asset/liability management decisions, future market movements, business plan changes, or if the net proceeds can be reinvested at a rate of return that is expected to recover the loss within a reasonable period of time.
Policy loans are reported at unpaid principal balances.
Real estate held for sale consists of the Citizens Academy training facility located near Austin, Texas. This asset is recorded at fair value, less estimated sales costs and is no longer being depreciated.
Other
long-term investments at December 31, 2020, consisted primarily of investments in private equity funds, a Rabbi Trust established for the benefit of the former Chief Executive Officer for the severance payment that was made to him on February 8, 2021, Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") common stock and mortgage loans. We initially estimate the fair value of investments in private equity funds by reference to the transaction price. Subsequently, we obtain the fair value of these investments from net asset value information provided by the general partner or manager of the investments, the financial statements of which are audited annually. Recognition of investment income on these funds is delayed due to the availability of the related financial statements, which are generally obtained from the partnerships' general partners. As a result, our private equity funds
are generally reported on a three-month delay.
We are a member of the FHLB of Dallas and such membership requires members to own stock in the FHLB. Our FHLB stock is carried at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
Mortgage loans on real estate are reported at unpaid principal balances. The Rabbi trust is carried at amortized cost which approximates fair value.
The Company had cash equivalents and fixed maturity securities with an aggregate fair value of $i10.8
million and $i9.6 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, on deposit with various state regulatory authorities to fulfill statutory requirements.
iCash
consists of balances on hand and on deposit in banks and financial institutions. Cash equivalents consists of securities whose duration does not exceed 90 days at the date of acquisition.
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS
The Company considers investments maturing within one year at acquisition as short-term. These securities are carried at fair value.
REINSURANCE RECOVERABLE
i
Reinsurance
recoverable includes expected reimbursements for policyholder claim amounts in excess of the Company's retention, as well as profit sharing and experience refund accruals. Reinsurance recoverable is reduced for estimated uncollectible amounts, if any.
Reinsurance premiums, benefits and expenses are accounted for on a basis consistent with those used in accounting for the original policies issued and the terms of the reinsurance contracts. The cost of reinsurance related to long duration contracts is accounted for over the life of the underlying reinsured policies using assumptions consistent with those used to account for the
underlying policies. The cost of reinsurance related to short duration contracts is accounted for over the coverage period. Profit-sharing and similar adjustable provisions are accrued based on the experience of the underlying policies.
DEFERRED POLICY ACQUISITION COSTS
i
Acquisition
costs consist of commissions and policy issuance, underwriting and agent convention expenses that are directly related to and vary with the successful production of new business are deferred. These deferred amounts, referred to as deferred policy acquisition costs ("DAC"), are recorded as an asset on the consolidated balance sheets and amortized to income in a systematic manner, based on related contract revenues or gross profits as appropriate.
Traditional life insurance and accident and health insurance acquisition costs are amortized over the premium-paying period of the related policies using assumptions consistent with those used in computing future policy benefit liabilities. For universal life type contracts
and investment contracts that include significant surrender charges or that yield significant revenues from sources other than the investment contract holders' funds, the deferred contract acquisition cost amortization is matched to the recognition of gross profit. The effect on the DAC asset that would result from realization of unrealized gains or losses is recognized with an offset to accumulated other comprehensive income in consolidated stockholders' equity. If an internal replacement of insurance or investment contract modification substantially changes a contract
as defined in current accounting guidance, then the DAC is written off immediately through income and any new deferrable costs associated with the new replacement are deferred. If a contract modification does not substantially change the contract, the DAC amortization on the original contract will continue and any acquisition costs associated with the related modification are immediately expensed.
The ending DAC asset balance is calculated at a seriatim level for policies in force at the end of each reporting period based on the remaining unamortized asset. The assumptions used to calculate DAC are set when a policy
is issued and do not change with changes in actual experience, unless a loss recognition event occurs. The seriatim method ensures that policies lapsed or surrendered during the reporting period are no longer included in the DAC calculation. This method limits the amount of deferred costs to its estimated realizable value, provided actual experience is comparable to that contemplated in the locked-in assumptions.
Inherent in the capitalization and amortization of DAC are certain management judgments about what acquisition costs are deferred, the ending asset balance and the annual amortization. Approximately i93.3%
of our capitalized DAC is attributed to first year and renewal excess commissions. The remaining i6.7% is attributed to costs that vary with and are directly related to the successful acquisition of new insurance business. Those costs generally include costs related to the production, underwriting and issuance of new business.
DAC is subject to recoverability testing
at the time of policy issuance and loss recognition testing on an annual basis, or when an event occurs that might require loss recognition testing. If loss recognition or impairment is necessary, DAC would be written off to the extent that anticipated future premiums and investment income is insufficient to cover expected future policy benefits and expenses. Loss recognition testing that considers, among other things, actual experience and projected future experience calculates the available premium (gross premium less the benefit and expense portion of premium) for the next i50 years. DAC is evaluated for recoverability using best
estimate assumptions. Based on the results of DAC recoverability testing and loss recognition testing, management believes that our DAC as of the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 limits the amount of deferred costs to its estimated recoverable value.
DAC related to investment-oriented products is also adjusted to reflect the effect of unrealized gains or losses on AFS fixed maturity securities with related changes recognized through other comprehensive income (shadow DAC). The adjustment is made at each balance sheet date, as if the securities had been sold at their stated aggregate fair value and the proceeds reinvested at current yields. Similarly, for long-duration traditional insurance contracts,
if the assets supporting the liabilities are in a net unrealized gain position at the balance sheet date, loss recognition testing assumptions are updated to exclude such gains from future cash flows by reflecting the impact of reinvestment rates on future yields. If a future loss is anticipated under this basis, any additional shortfall indicated by loss recognition tests is recognized as a reduction in accumulated other comprehensive income (shadow loss recognition). Similar to other loss recognition on long-duration insurance contracts, such shortfall is first reflected as a reduction in DAC and secondly as an increase in liabilities for future policy benefits. The change in these adjustments, net of tax, is included with the change in net unrealized appreciation of investments that is credited or charged directly to other comprehensive income.
i
The
components of DAC from year to year are summarized as follows:
Years ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Balance at beginning of period
$
i149,249
i155,747
i167,063
Capitalization
of deferred policy acquisition costs
i20,475
i22,255
i22,695
Amortization
of deferred policy acquisition costs
(i27,439)
(i28,268)
(i34,235)
Effects
of unrealized (gains) losses
(i37,372)
(i485)
i224
Balance
at end of period
$
i104,913
i149,249
i155,747
/
We
converted to a new actuarial valuation software solution that provided enhanced modeling capabilities for the ordinary whole life policies of SPLIC as of July 1, 2019 and the ordinary whole life and endowment policies of CICA and CICA Ltd. as of July 1, 2018. The total impact of these system conversions, which impacted both the Home Service Insurance and Life Insurance segments, reflect changes in actuarial valuation estimates associated with the
conversion. iThe impact is reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements
and summarized in the table below.
(In thousands)
2019
2018
Increase (Decrease)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
DAC
$
(i1,396)
(i4,339)
Future
policy benefit reserves:
Life insurance
(i2,299)
(i10,197)
Consolidated
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Decrease in future policy benefit reserves
(i2,299)
(i10,197)
Amortization
of deferred policy acquisition costs
i1,396
i4,339
Income
before federal income tax
i903
i5,858
Federal
income tax expense
i190
i1,230
Net
income
$
i713
i4,628
COST
OF INSURANCE ACQUIRED
Cost of insurance acquired ("COIA") is established when we purchase a block of insurance. COIA is amortized over the emerging profit of the related policies using the same assumptions as were used in computing liabilities for future policy benefits. Inherent in the amortization of COIA are certain management judgments used in the estimation of the ending asset balance and the annual amortization. The key assumptions used in management's estimates are based upon interest, mortality and lapses at the time of purchase.
A recoverability test that considers, among other things, actual experience and projected future experience is performed at least annually. These annual recoverability tests are based initially on an estimate of the available premium (gross premium less the
benefit and expense portion of premium) for the next i50 years. Management believes that our COIA is recoverable for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. This belief is based upon the analysis performed on estimated future results of the block and our annual recoverability testing.
i
COIA
relative to purchased blocks of insurance is summarized as follows:
Years ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Balance at beginning of period
$
i13,455
i15,225
i17,499
Amortization
(i1,816)
(i1,546)
(i2,458)
Change
in effects of unrealized (gains) losses on COIA
Estimated
amortization of COIA in each of the next five years and thereafter is as follows. Actual future amortization will differ from these estimates due to variances from estimated future withdrawal assumptions.
(In thousands)
Amount
Cost of insurance acquired:
Year:
2021
$
i760
2022
i691
2023
i633
2024
i582
2025
i536
Thereafter
i8,823
i12,025
Effects
of unrealized (gains) losses on COIA
(i484)
Total cost of insurance acquired
$
i11,541
/
The
value of COIA resulting from our various acquisitions was determined based on the present value of future profits discounted at annual rates ranging from i3.7% to i8.5%.
GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
i
Goodwill is the difference between the purchase price in a business combination and the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired and is not amortized. Other intangible assets include various state insurance licenses, which have been determined to have indefinite useful lives and, therefore, are not amortized. Both goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are subject to annual impairment analysis.
Goodwill
is tested for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment exist. The goodwill testing requires us to compare the estimated fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value. If the carrying value of the reporting unit is lower than its estimated fair value, no further evaluation is required. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, an impairment charge is recorded for that excess, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. We have the option of performing an assessment of certain qualitative factors to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value or proceeding directly to a quantitative impairment test. We elected to apply the quantitative assessment for the goodwill in our reporting units within each of our operating segments as of December 31,
2020 and 2019.
We performed our annual goodwill impairment test and the fair value was in excess of the segment's carrying value for the years ended 2020, 2019 or 2018, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had $i12.6 million of goodwill allocated to the Life Insurance segment. We apply significant judgement when determining the
estimated fair value of our reporting unit. These judgments incorporate multiple inputs including discounted cash flow calculations based on assumptions that market participants would make in valuing the reporting unit, levels of economic capital, production levels and profitability of new business, pricing changes, spread compression, value of in force, discount rate and earnings projections. Estimates of fair value are inherently uncertain and represent management’s reasonable expectations regarding future developments. Unfavorable changes to assumptions or factors that decrease the fair value and could result in future impairment include, but are not limited to, lower expectations for future sales, higher maintenance expenses, unfavorable mortality, higher discount rates and market-based inputs. Increases in the carrying value of the segment caused by recognition of uncertain tax benefits could also result in future impairment.
Property and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the useful lives of the assets, ranging from three to thirty years.
i
The
following is a summary of property and equipment.
December 31, (In thousands)
2020
2019
Property and equipment:
Home office, land and buildings
$
i4,136
i4,136
Furniture
and equipment
i1,618
i881
Electronic
data processing equipment and computer software
The
Company has several lease agreements for real estate and equipment, such as its corporate home office and several district office locations related to our Home Service Insurance segment. The Company recognizes these lease agreements on the consolidated balance sheets as a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability. The Company uses its estimated incremental borrowing rate, which is derived from information available at lease commencement date, in determining the present value of lease payments.
/
FUTURE POLICY BENEFITS AND EXPENSES
i
Future
policy benefit reserves for traditional life insurance are established based on methods and underlying assumptions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and applicable actuarial standards. Assumptions as to investment yields, expenses, mortality and lapses are based upon our experience, modified as necessary to reflect anticipated trends and to include provisions for possible adverse deviations.
The accrued account balance for non-traditional life insurance and investment contracts is computed as deposits net of withdrawals made by the contract holder, plus amounts credited based on contract specifications, less contract
fees and charges assessed, plus any additional interest. Annuity interest crediting rates range from i2.5% to i5.5% annually. Benefits and expenses are charged against the account balance to recognize costs as incurred over the
estimated lives of the contracts. Expenses include interest credited to contract account balances and benefits paid in excess of contract account balances.
Unpaid claims on accident and health and specialty property insurance policies represent the estimated liability for benefit expenses, both reported but not paid and incurred but not reported to the Company. The liability for incurred but not reported claims includes estimates for additional claim amounts due related to reported claims. Liabilities for
unpaid claims are estimated using individual
case basis valuations and statistical analysis. Those estimates are subject to the effects of trends in claim severity and frequency.
Anticipated investment income is not considered in determining whether a premium deficiency exists with respect to short-duration contracts. Premium deposits accrue interest at rates ranging from i2.5% to i6.0%
per annum. The cost of insurance is included in the premium when collected and interest is credited annually to deposit accounts.
The development of liabilities for future policy benefits requires management to make estimates and assumptions regarding mortality, persistency, expense, and investment experience based on historical experience and future expectations of those assumptions. Actual results could differ materially from estimates. An additional provision is made on most products to allow for possible adverse deviation from the assumptions assumed.We monitor actual experience and revise assumptions as necessary.
PARTICIPATING POLICIES
i
At
December 31, 2020 and 2019, participating business approximated i60.8% and i62.2%
of direct life insurance in force, respectively.
Future policy benefits on participating policies are estimated based on net level premium reserves for death and endowment policy benefits with interest rates ranging from i3.2% to i9.0%,
and the cash surrender values described in such contracts. The scaling rate used for the 2020 portfolio ranged between i3.25% for i1
year and then going up to i4.36% over i20 years and remaining there for the duration. Earnings and dividends on participating policies
are allocated based on policies in force.
Policyholder dividends are determined based on the discretion of the Board of the policy issuing subsidiary. Policyholder dividends are accrued over the premium paying periods of the insurance contract.
/
CONTINGENCIES
i
An
estimated loss from a contingency is accrued and charged to results of operations only if both of the following conditions are met:
1.Information available prior to the issuance of the consolidated financial statements indicates that it is probable(virtual certainty is not required) that an asset has been impaired or a liability incurred as of the date of the consolidated financial statements; and
2.The amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
Reasonable estimation of a possible loss does not require estimating a single amount of the loss. It requires that a loss be accrued if it can be estimated within a range. If an amount within the range is a better
estimate than any other amount within the range, that amount is accrued. If no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, the minimum amount in the range is accrued.
A gain contingency is an uncertain situation that will be resolved in the future, possibly resulting in a gain. We do not allow the recognition of a gain contingency prior to settlement of the underlying event. If we were to have a material gain contingency, we would disclose it in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
PREMIUM REVENUE AND RELATED EXPENSES
iPremiums
on life policies are recognized as earned when due. Premiums paid in advance on the consolidated balance sheets are held on deposit and accrue interest at rates ranging from i2.5% to i6.0% until such time as
the premiums become due. Premiums on accident and health policies are recognized as revenue over the contract period on a pro rata basis. Benefits and expenses are associated with earned premiums so as to result in the /
recognition of profits over the estimated lives of the contracts. This matching is accomplished by means of a provision for future policy benefits and the capitalization and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs.
Annuity policies, primarily flexible premium fixed annuity products, are accounted for in a manner consistent with
accounting for interest bearing financial instruments. Premium receipts are not reported as revenue, rather as deposit liabilities to annuity contracts. The annuity products issued do not include fees or other such charges.
INCOME TAXES
i
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts
of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered.
A deferred tax asset is recorded only if a determination is made that it is more-likely-than-not that the tax treatment on which the deferred tax asset depends will be sustained in the event of an audit. These determinations inherently involve management's judgment. In addition, the Company must record a tax valuation allowance with respect to deferred tax assets if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax benefit will not be realized.
EARNINGS PER SHARE
iBasic
earnings per share are computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share are computed under the if-converted method for convertible securities and the treasury stock method for warrants, giving effect to all potential dilutive common stock, including options, warrants and convertible/redeemable preferred stock. iThe basic and diluted earnings per share of Class B common stock are one half the earnings per share of the Class A common stock./
USE OF ESTIMATES
i
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.
Significant
estimates include those used in the evaluation of credit losses on fixed maturity securities, actuarially determined assets and liabilities and assumptions, tests of goodwill impairment, valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, valuation of uncertain tax positions and contingencies relating to litigation and regulatory matters. Certain of these estimates are particularly sensitive to market conditions, and deterioration and/or volatility in the worldwide debt or equity markets could have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
iCertain
amounts presented in prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. No individual amounts were material.
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
i
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS RECENTLY ADOPTED
In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") released Accounting Standards Update
("ASU") No. 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This ASU requires equity investments, except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, that have readily determinable fair values to be measured at fair value with any changes in fair value recognized in net income. Equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair values may be measured at estimated fair value or cost less impairment, if any, adjusted for subsequent observable price changes, with changes in the carrying value
recognized in net income. A qualitative assessment for impairment is required for equity investments without readily determinable fair values. The updated guidance also eliminates the requirement to disclose the method and significant assumptions
used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the consolidated financial statements. The Company adopted the updated guidance effective January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance resulted in the recognition of $i0.6 million of net after-tax unrealized
gains on equity investments as a cumulative effect adjustment that decreased retained deficit as of January 1, 2018 and decreased accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI") by the same amount. The Company elected to report changes in the fair value of equity investments in realized investment gains (losses), net.
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This ASU allows a reclassification from AOCI to retained earnings of the stranded tax effects that occurred due to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the "Tax Act"). The updated guidance was effective for reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2018 and is to be applied retrospectively to each period in which there are items impacted by the Tax Act remaining in AOCI or at the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company adopted the updated guidance effective January 1, 2018 and elected to reclassify the income tax effects of the Tax Act from AOCI to accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2018. This reclassification resulted in an increase in accumulated deficit of $i4.7
million as of January 1, 2018 and an increase in AOCI by the same amount. The Company’s accounting policy for the release of stranded tax effects in AOCI is on an aggregate portfolio basis.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses(Topic 326), with the main objective to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. The ASU requires a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected
to be collected. The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost of the financial asset(s) to present the net carrying value at the amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. The income statement reflects the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets, as well as the increases or decreases of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period. Credit losses on AFS fixed maturity securities should be measured in a manner similar to current U.S. GAAP; however, the credit losses are recorded through an allowance for credit losses rather than as a write-down. This approach is an improvement to prior U.S. GAAP because an entity will be able to record reversals of credit losses (in situations in which the estimate of credit losses declines) in current period net income, which in turn should align the income statement recognition of credit losses with the reporting period in
which changes occur. Prior U.S. GAAP prohibited reflecting those improvements in current-period earnings. The Company adopted this standard effective January 1, 2020 using the modified retrospective approach. The adoption resulted in an increase in accumulated deficit of $i0.4 million related to agents' debit balance collectability.
In
September 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract. This ASU requires an entity in a cloud computing arrangement (i.e., hosting arrangement) that is a service contract to follow the internal-use software guidance in Accounting Standards Codification 350-40 to determine which implementation costs to capitalize as assets or expense as incurred. Capitalized implementation costs should be presented in the same line item on the balance sheet as amounts prepaid for the hosted service, if any (generally as an "other asset"). The capitalized costs will be amortized over the term of the hosting arrangement, with the amortization expense
being presented in the same income statement line item as the fees paid for the hosted service. We adopted this standard effective January 1, 2020. The adoption had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-12, Financial Services-Insurance (Topic 944): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts. This ASU amends four key areas of the accounting and impacts disclosures for long-duration insurance and investment contracts:
•Requires
updated assumptions for liability measurement. Assumptions used to measure the liability for traditional insurance contracts, which are typically determined at contract inception, will now be reviewed at least annually, and, if there is a change, updated, with the effect recorded in net income;
•Standardizes the liability discount rate. The liability discount rate will be a market-observable discount rate (upper-medium grade fixed-income instrument yield), with the effect of rate changes recorded in other comprehensive income;
•Provides greater consistency in measurement of market risk benefits. The
two previous measurement models have been reduced to one measurement model (fair value), resulting in greater uniformity across similar market-based benefits and better alignment with the fair value measurement of derivatives used to hedge capital market risk;
•Simplifies amortization of DAC. Previous earnings-based amortization methods have been replaced with a more level amortization basis; and
•Requires enhanced disclosures. The new disclosures include rollforwards and information about significant assumptions and the effects of changes in those assumptions.
For calendar-year public companies, the changes will be effective on January 1, 2023, however,
early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of this new guidance, and it is expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
No other new accounting pronouncement issued or effective during the year had, or is expected to have, a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
(2)INVESTMENTS
i
The
Company invests primarily in fixed maturity securities, which totaled i89.8% of total cash and invested assets at December 31, 2020.
The
following table represents the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair value of fixed maturity securities as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Most
of the Company's equity securities are diversified stock and bond mutual funds.
Fair Value as of December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
Equity securities:
Stock
mutual funds
$
i3,174
i3,274
Bond
mutual funds
i12,354
i12,311
Common
stock
i1,143
i134
Non-redeemable
preferred stock
i281
i314
Non-redeemable
preferred stock fund
i5,150
i—
Total
equity securities
$
i22,102
i16,033
/
VALUATION
OF INVESTMENTS
AFS fixed maturity securities are reported in the consolidated financial statements at fair value. Equity securities are measured at fair value with the change in fair value recorded through net income. The Company recognized net realized gains of $i1.6 million and $i1.0 million
on equity securities held for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
The Company monitors all AFS fixed maturity securities on an on-going basis relative to changes in credit ratings, market prices, earnings trends and financial performance, in addition to specific region or industry reviews. The Company evaluates whether a credit impairment exists for fixed maturity securities by considering primarily the following factors: (a) changes in the financial condition of the security's underlying collateral; (b) whether the issuer is current on contractually obligated interest and principal payments; (c) changes in the financial
condition, credit rating and near-term prospects of the issuer; and (d) the payment structure of the security. The Company's best estimate of expected future cash flows used to determine the credit loss amount is a quantitative and qualitative process. Quantitative review includes information received from third-party sources such as financial statements, pricing and rating changes, liquidity and other statistical information. Qualitative factors include judgments related to business strategies, economic impacts on the issuer, overall judgment related to estimates and industry factors as well as the Company's intent to sell the security, or if it is more likely than not that the Company would be required to sell a security
before recovery of its amortized cost.
The Company's best estimate of future cash flows involves assumptions including, but not limited to, various performance indicators, such as historical and projected default and recovery rates, credit ratings, and current delinquency rates. These assumptions require the use of significant management judgment and include the probability of issuer default and estimates regarding timing and amount of expected recoveries, which may include estimating the underlying collateral value. In addition, projections of expected future fixed maturity security cash flows may change based upon new information regarding the performance of the issuer. Any credit losses are presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down on AFS fixed maturity securities management does not intend
to sell or believes that it is more likely than not we will be required to sell.
We adopted ASU 2016-13 using the prospective transition approach for fixed maturity securities for which other-than-temporary impairment had been recognized prior to January 1, 2020. As a result, the amortized cost remains the same before and after adoption. The effective interest rate on these fixed maturity securities was not changed. Amounts previously recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income as of January 1, 2020 relating to improvements in cash flow expected to be collected will be accreted into income over the remaining life of the asset. Recoveries of amounts previously written off relating to improvements in cash flows after January 1, 2020
will be recorded in earnings when received.
The Company recorded ino credit valuation losses on fixed maturity securities for the year December 31, 2020 and recognized ino
fixed maturity investment impairments for the year ended December 31, 2019.
For
fixed maturity security investments that have unrealized losses as of December 31, 2020, the gross unrealized losses that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months, gross unrealized losses that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer and fair value are as follows.
In
each category of our fixed maturity securities described below, we do not intend to sell our investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases. While the losses are currently unrealized, we continue to monitor all fixed maturity securities on an on-going basis as future information may become available which could result in an allowance being recorded.
States and political subdivisions. The Company's investments in states and political subdivisions were purchased at a premium, relative to their face amount, and the contractual cash flows are guaranteed by the respective state or political subdivision. Accordingly,
it is expected that the securities will not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost bases of the Company's investments.
Corporate. We did not recognize credit losses on corporate securities with unrealized losses that were due to interest rate sensitivity and changes in credit spreads. We believe that fluctuations caused by movements in interest rates and credit spreads have little bearing on the recoverability of our investments. While we are experiencing unrealized losses across several corporate sectors, the energy and automobile sectors have been impacted the most by recent economic pressures and some issuers within these sectors have been downgraded to below investment grade. We have assessed our exposure in the energy sector and believe our investments have access
to sufficient liquidity to meet their debt obligations. The auto industry has been able to issue debt which has increased the liquidity of the component companies in the sector significantly. The automobile sector is included in the Consumer subtotal above.
Asset-backed. Our asset-backed securities are primarily collateralized loan obligations. We do not expect to realize any losses for these securities and see the current valuations as a result of general market conditions. All of the active asset-backed securities are rated investment grade.
The following table presents the fair values
and gross unrealized losses of fixed maturity securities that are not deemed to have OTTI, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position at December 31, 2019.
We
have reviewed the securities in an unrealized loss position for the period ended December 31, 2019 and determined that ino OTTI exists that has not been recognized based on our evaluation of the credit worthiness of the issuers and the fact that we do not intend to sell the investments nor is it likely that we will be required to sell the securities before recovery of their amortized cost bases which may be at
maturity.
i
The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity securities at December 31, 2020 by contractual maturity are shown in the table below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Securities not due at a single maturity date have been reflected based upon final stated maturity.
(In
thousands)
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Fixed maturity securities:
Due in one year or less
$
i15,515
i15,726
Due
after one year through five years
i120,268
i129,853
Due
after five years through ten years
i229,281
i253,168
Due
after ten years
i956,423
i1,090,636
Total
fixed maturity securities
$
i1,321,487
i1,489,383
/
The
Company had iino/
investments in any one entity which exceeded 10% of stockholders' equity at December 31, 2020 or 2019. In addition, there were iino/
investments that were non-income producing for the years ended December 31, 2020 or 2019.
Major
categories of net investment income are summarized as follows:
Years ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Gross investment income:
Fixed
maturity securities
$
i54,653
i53,860
i49,126
Equity
securities
i816
i662
i722
Policy
loans
i6,605
i6,451
i6,210
Other
long-term investments
i238
i13
i15
Other
i97
i374
i409
Total
investment income
i62,409
i61,360
i56,482
Investment
expenses
(i2,212)
(i1,829)
(i2,277)
Net
investment income
$
i60,197
i59,531
i54,205
/
i
The
Company uses the specific identification method of the individual security to determine the cost basis used in the calculation of realized gains and losses related to security sales.
Years ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Proceeds
$
i20,537
i66,900
i38,823
Gross
realized gains
$
i239
i2,538
i1,301
Gross
realized losses
$
i351
i973
i653
/
We
sold i29, i68 and i41
fixed maturity securities from our available-for-sale portfolio in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, as part of a repositioning strategy recommended by our asset manager. There were ino securities sold from the held-to-maturity portfolio in 2018.
There were iiino//
sales of equity securities in 2020, 2019 and 2018.
i
Realized investment gains (losses) are as follows:
During 2019, the
Company sold its former corporate office in Austin, Texas for a gross sale price of $i7.5 million, resulting in a gain on the sale of $i5.5
million. The building was owned by CICA and was included in our Life Insurance segment.
An impairment loss of $i3.1 million was recorded in 2019 in our Other Non-Insurance Enterprises segment in connection with reclassifying our Citizens Academy training facility located near Austin, Texas as real estate held for sale. This facility is no longer being used by the
Company and is being actively marketed for sale.
(3)FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
i
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. We hold AFS fixed maturity securities, which are carried at fair value. We also report our equity securities at fair value with changes in fair value reported through the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Fair value measurements are generally based upon observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our view of market assumptions in the absence of observable market information. We utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. All assets and liabilities carried at fair value are required to be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
•Level
1 - Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
•Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-derived valuations whose inputs or whose significant value drivers are observable.
•Level 3 - Instruments whose significant value drivers are unobservable.
Level 1 primarily consists of financial instruments whose value is based on quoted market prices such as U.S. Treasury securities and actively traded mutual fund and stock investments.
Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued by independent pricing services or broker quotes. These
pricing models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various inputs, such as interest rates, credit spreads and foreign exchange rates for the underlying financial instruments. All significant inputs are observable or derived from observable information in the marketplace or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace. Financial instruments in this category primarily include corporate securities, U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise securities, securities issued by states and political subdivisions and certain mortgage and asset-backed securities.
Level 3 is comprised of financial instruments whose fair value is estimated based on non-binding broker prices utilizing significant inputs not based on or corroborated by readily available market information. Real estate held-for-sale is in this category.
We
review the fair value hierarchy classifications each reporting period. Changes in the observability of the valuation attributes may result in a reclassification of certain financial assets. Such reclassifications are reported as transfers in and out of Level 3 at the beginning fair value for the reporting period in which the changes occur. There were iiiino///
transfers in or out of Level 3 during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
U.S. Treasury and U.S.
Government-sponsored enterprises
$
i11,326
i4,791
i—
i16,117
States
and political subdivisions
i—
i409,665
i—
i409,665
Corporate
i52
i877,156
i—
i877,208
Commercial
mortgage-backed
i—
i221
i—
i221
Residential
mortgage-backed
i—
i139,963
i—
i139,963
Asset-backed
i—
i46,091
i—
i46,091
Foreign
governments
i—
i118
i—
i118
Total
fixed maturity securities available-for-sale
i11,378
i1,478,005
i—
i1,489,383
Equity
securities:
Stock mutual funds
i3,174
i—
i—
i3,174
Bond
mutual funds
i12,354
i—
i—
i12,354
Common
stock
i1,143
i—
i—
i1,143
Non-redeemable
preferred stock
i281
i—
i—
i281
Non-redeemable
preferred stock fund
i5,150
i—
i—
i5,150
Total
equity securities
i22,102
i—
i—
i22,102
Other
long-term investments (1)
i—
i—
i—
i11,923
Total
financial assets
$
i33,480
i1,478,005
i—
i1,523,408
(1)
In accordance with Subtopic 820-10, certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in this table are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the balance sheet.
U.S.
Treasury and U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises
$
i11,348
i4,530
i—
i15,878
States
and political subdivisions
i—
i536,284
i—
i536,284
Corporate
i52
i650,036
i—
i650,088
Commercial
mortgage-backed
i—
i1,100
i—
i1,100
Residential
mortgage-backed
i—
i130,287
i—
i130,287
Asset-backed
i—
i44,203
i—
i44,203
Foreign
governments
i—
i119
i—
i119
Total
fixed maturity securities available-for-sale
i11,400
i1,366,559
i—
i1,377,959
Equity
securities:
Stock mutual funds
i3,274
i—
i—
i3,274
Bond
mutual funds
i12,311
i—
i—
i12,311
Common
stock
i134
i—
i—
i134
Non-redeemable
preferred stock
i314
i—
i—
i314
Total
equity securities
i16,033
i—
i—
i16,033
Total
financial assets
$
i27,433
i1,366,559
i—
i1,393,992
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS VALUATION
Fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale. At December 31, 2020, fixed maturity securities, valued using a third-party pricing source, totaled $i1.5 billion for Level 2 assets and comprised i97.0%
of total reported fair value of our financial assets. The Level 1 and Level 2 valuations are reviewed and updated quarterly through testing by comparisons to separate pricing models, other third-party pricing services, and back tested to recent trades. In addition, we obtain information annually relative to the third-party pricing models and review model parameters for reasonableness. There were ino Level 3 assets as of December 31, 2020. For the period ended December 31, 2020,
there were ino material changes to the valuation methods or assumptions used to determine fair values, and ino broker or third-party prices were changed from the values received.
Equity
securities. Our equity securities are classified as Level 1 assets as their fair values are based upon quoted market prices.
Private equity funds. The Company considers the net asset value ("NAV") to represent the value of the investment fund and is measured by the total value of assets minus the total value of liabilities. The following table includes information related to our investments in private equity funds that calculate NAV per share. For these investments,
which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, we use the NAV per share to measure fair value. iThese
investments are included in other long-term investments on the consolidated balance sheets.
Investments in privately-originated, performing senior secured debt primarily in North America-based companies
$
i10,542
$
i29,783
i10
Term
liquidity facility
Investments in a facility established by the U.S. Federal Reserve that provides financing to U.S. company market participants for levered asset purchases with a focus on asset-backed, commercial mortgage and collateralized loan obligation markets
i1,381
i—
i3
Late-stage
growth
Investments in private late-stage, established companies seeking capital to accelerate growth prior to an IPO or sale
i—
i16,291
i7
Infrastructure
Investments
in climate infrastructure assets, focusing on renewable power generation in wind and solar energy
i—
i17,497
i12
Total
private equity funds
$
i11,923
$
i63,571
Our
private equity fund investments are not redeemable because distributions from the funds will be received when the underlying investments of the funds are liquidated. The life spans indicated above may be shortened or extended at the fund manager's discretion, typically in one or two-year increments.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS NOT CARRIED AT FAIR VALUE
Estimates of fair values are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market prices and information about the financial instruments. The estimated fair values of financial instruments presented below are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company might realize in actual market transactions.
i
The
carrying amount and fair value for the financial assets and liabilities on the consolidated financial statements not otherwise disclosed for the periods indicated were as follows:
Policy
loans. Policy loans had a weighted average annual interest rate of ii7.7/%
at both December 31, 2020 and 2019 and no specified maturity dates. The aggregate fair value of policy loans approximates the carrying value
reflected
on the consolidated balance sheets. Policy loans are an integral part of the life insurance policies we have in force, cannot be valued separately and are not marketable. Therefore, the fair value of policy loans approximates the carrying value and policy loans are considered Level 3 assets in the fair value hierarchy.
Mortgage loans. Mortgage loans are secured principally by residential properties. Weighted average interest rates for these loans were approximately ii6.4/%
at both December 31, 2020 and 2019, with maturities ranging from i8 to i19 years. Management estimated the fair value using an annual interest rate of ii6.25/%
at both December 31, 2020 and 2019. Our mortgage loans are considered Level 3 assets in the fair value hierarchy.
Other. The fair value of short-term investments and cash and cash equivalents approximate carrying value and are characterized as Level 1 assets in the fair value hierarchy.
Annuity liabilities. The fair value of the Company's liabilities under annuity contract policies, which are considered Level 3 liabilities, was estimated at December 31,
2020 and 2019 using discounted cash flows based upon spot rates adjusted for various risk adjustments ranging from i0.22% to i2.34%
and i1.67% to i3.02%, respectively. The fair value of liabilities under all insurance contracts
are taken into consideration in the overall management of interest rate risk, which seeks to minimize exposure to changing interest rates through the matching of investment maturities with amounts due under insurance contracts.
The following table summarizes the carrying amounts of other long-term investments.
Years ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
Other
long-term investments:
Private equity funds
$
i18,135
i—
FHLB
common stock
i190
i187
Mortgage
loans
i157
i177
All
other investments
i8,811
i21
Total
other long-term investments
$
i27,293
i385
We
are a member of the FHLB of Dallas and such membership requires members to own stock in the FHLB. Our FHLB stock is carried at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Included in all other investments at December 31, 2020 is a Rabbi Trust holding of $i8.8 million for the benefit of our former Chief Executive Officer, Geoffrey M. Kolander, representing the severance payment due to him under the terms of his employment agreement in connection with his resignation following
a change in control of the Company. Such amount was paid to him in February 2021.
(4)POLICY LIABILITIES AND SHORT DURATION CONTRACTS
iiVarious
assumptions used to determine the future policy benefit reserves of life insurance include valuation interest rates, mortality assumptions and withdrawals./
The following table presents information on changes in the liability for life, accident and health and property
policy and contract claims for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
Years ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Policy
claims payable:
Balance at January 1
$
i8,059
i7,614
i8,610
Less: reinsurance
recoverable
i796
i511
i367
Net
balance at January 1
i7,263
i7,103
i8,243
Add
claims incurred, related to:
Current year
i38,400
i26,816
i24,793
Prior
years
i195
i543
(i197)
i38,595
i27,359
i24,596
Deduct
claims paid, related to:
Current year
i29,767
i20,629
i18,933
Prior
years
i5,897
i6,570
i6,803
i35,664
i27,199
i25,736
Net
balance December 31
i10,194
i7,263
i7,103
Plus: reinsurance
recoverable
i3,012
i796
i511
Balance
at December 31
$
i13,206
i8,059
i7,614
/
The
Company experienced unfavorable development in 2020 and 2019 of $i0.2 million and $i0.5 million,
respectively, and favorable development of $i0.2 million in 2018. No unusual claims or trends have been noted.
The
Company's short duration contracts consist of credit life and credit disability in the Life Insurance segment and property insurance in the Home Service Insurance segment. The credit insurance lines are an immaterial part of short duration contracts so the following disclosures cover only the property insurance line of business in the Home Service segment.
The following table presents incurred claims development as of December 31, 2020, net of reinsurance, as well as cumulative claim frequency and the total of incurred-but-not-reported liabilities plus expected development on reported claims included within the net incurred claims amounts. iThis
information is presented for the last five years as these claims rarely pay out over a longer period of time.
The
reconciliation of the net incurred and paid claims development tables to the liability for claims and claim adjustment expenses in the consolidated statement of financial position is as follows.
Years ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
Net outstanding liabilities:
Special
property
$
i743
i437
Other
short duration insurance lines
i214
i147
Liabilities
for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance
i957
i584
Reinsurance
recoverable on unpaid claims:
Special property
i2,955
i4
Other
short duration insurance lines
i57
i213
Total
reinsurance recoverable on unpaid claims
i3,012
i217
Insurance
lines other than short duration
i9,237
i7,258
Total
gross liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expense
$
i13,206
i8,059
/
i
The
following is supplementary information to the consolidated financial statements about average historical claims duration as of December 31, 2020.
Average Annual Percentage Payout of Incurred Claims by Age, Net of Reinsurance (Unaudited)
Years
1
2
3
4
5
Special
property
i86.39
%
i9.35
%
i0.28
%
i—
%
i—
%
/
(5)REINSURANCE
i
In the normal course of business, the Company reinsures portions of certain policies that we underwrite to limit disproportionate risks. During 2020 and 2019, we retained varying amounts of individual insurance up to a maximum retention of $ii100,000/
on any life. The Company also reinsures i100% of our accidental death benefit rider coverage. Catastrophe reinsurance is in place for our property policies. In 2020 and 2019, this reinsurance provided $ii10.0/
million of coverage above a $ii0.5/
million deductible. In consideration for a reinstatement premium, second event coverage is provided in excess of a $ii0.5/
million deductible up to $ii10.0/
million. The annual premium was approximately $i1.4 million in 2020 and $ii0.8/ million
in 2019 and 2018. Our health insurance policies are substantially all reinsured on a i100% coinsurance basis. We remain contingently liable to the extent that the reinsuring companies cannot meet their obligations under these reinsurance treaties.
Our amounts recoverable from reinsurers represent receivables from and reserves ceded to reinsurers. We obtain reinsurance from multiple reinsurers, and we monitor concentration as
well as financial strength ratings of our principal reinsurers. The ratings by A.M. Best Company range from A (Excellent) to A+ (Superior).
Assumed and ceded life reinsurance activity as of December 31, 2020 and 2019
is summarized as follows:
December 31, (In thousands)
2020
2019
Aggregate assumed life insurance in force
$
i4,615
i4,892
Aggregate
ceded life insurance in force
$
i474,792
i486,937
Net
life insurance in force
$
i4,141,968
i4,246,781
/
The
Company's reinsurance recoverable on ceded reinsurance was $i5.8 million and $i3.7 million
in 2020 and 2019, respectively. Premiums, claims and surrenders assumed and ceded for all lines of business for these years are summarized as follows:
During
the third and fourth quarters of 2020, SPFIC was impacted by Hurricanes Laura, Delta and Zeta, all of which caused varying levels of damage in Louisiana. The Company has a reinsurance agreement that covers catastrophic events such as these hurricanes. The reinsurance agreement specifies a maximum coverage per event of $ii10.0/
million and a retention level of $ii0.5/
million per event. In consideration for a reinstatement premium, second event coverage is provided in excess of a $ii0.5/
million deductible up to $ii10.0/
million. We have paid the $ii0.5/
million retention in claim amounts for both Laura and Delta and do not believe we will exceed the maximum coverage for either of them; however, any claims in excess of $ii10.5/
million would have to be paid by SPFIC. All claims related to Zeta will be paid by SPFIC. We expect the total of these claims to be less than $i0.5 million.
(6)STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND RESTRICTIONS
i
STOCK
The
itwo authorized classes of our common stock are equal in all respects, except (a) each Class A share is entitled to receive twice the cash dividends paid on a per share basis to the Class B common stock, if any; and (b) the Class B common stock has the exclusive right to elect a simple majority of the Board of Directors of Citizens and the Class A common stock elects the remaining directors.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share.
Years
ended December 31, (In thousands, except per share amounts)
2020
2019
2018
Basic and diluted earnings per share:
Numerator:
Net
loss
$
(i10,988)
(i1,370)
(i11,062)
Net
loss allocated to Class A common stock
$
(ii10,878/)
(ii1,356/)
(ii10,950/)
Net
loss allocated to Class B common stock
(ii110/)
(ii14/)
(ii112/)
Net
loss
$
(i10,988)
(i1,370)
(i11,062)
Denominator:
Weighted
average shares of Class A outstanding - basic
i49,400
i49,214
i49,080
Weighted
average shares of Class A outstanding - diluted
i49,938
i49,347
i49,139
Weighted
average shares of Class B outstanding - basic and diluted
i1,002
i1,002
i1,002
Total
weighted average shares outstanding - basic
i50,402
i50,216
i50,082
Total
weighted average shares outstanding - diluted
i50,940
i50,349
i50,141
Basic
and diluted loss per share of Class A common stock
$
(i0.22)
(i0.03)
(i0.22)
Basic
and diluted loss per share of Class B common stock
(i0.11)
(i0.01)
(i0.11)
/
STATUTORY
CAPITAL AND SURPLUS
i
The table below shows the combined total of all of our domestic insurance subsidiaries' statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income (loss) for life insurance operations and property insurance operations, although these amounts are not all available as dividends to Citizens because only CICA is directly owned by Citizens. All other domestic subsidiaries
are owned by CICA.
Generally,
the net assets of the domestic insurance subsidiaries available for transfer to their immediate parent are limited to the lesser of the subsidiary's net gain from operations during the preceding year or i10% of the subsidiary's net statutory surplus as of the end of the preceding year as determined in accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by
insurance regulatory authorities. Under these practices, total surplus at December 31, 2020 was $i39.6 million and net gain from operations was $i3.1
million for CICA. Based upon statutory net gain from operations and surplus of CICA as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020, a $i3.1 million dividend could be paid to the Company without prior regulatory approval in 2021. Payments of dividends in excess of such amounts would generally
require approval by regulatory authorities.
CICA, CNLIC, SPLIC, MGLIC and SPFIC have calculated their risk-based capital ("RBC") in accordance with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' ("NAIC") Model Rule and the RBC rules as adopted by their respective states of domicile. iAs part of the novation transaction with CICA Ltd., the Company agreed to infuse capital into CICA as required by the Colorado Department of Insurance to maintain CICA's RBC
above 350% in any future calendar year-end periods. All insurance subsidiaries exceeded RBC minimum levels at December 31, 2020.
Under the Bermuda Insurance Act 1978, an insurer is prohibited from declaring or paying a dividend if it is in breach of its Enhanced Capital Requirement (“ECR”) or Minimum Margin of Solvency (“MMS”) or if the declaration or payment of such dividend would cause such a breach. Where an insurer fails to meet its MMS on the last day of any financial year, it is prohibited from declaring or paying any dividends during the next financial year without the approval of the Bermuda Monetary Authority (the “BMA” or the "Authority"). Insurers are also prohibited from paying a dividend in an amount
exceeding i25% of the prior year’s total statutory capital and surplus, unless at least two members of the board of directors and its principal representative sign and submit to the BMA an affidavit attesting that a dividend in excess of this amount would not cause such insurer to fail to meet its relevant margins. In certain instances, the insurer would also be required to provide prior notice to the BMA in advance of the payment of dividends.
In the event that such an affidavit
is submitted to the BMA in accordance with the Bermuda Insurance Act, and further subject to CICA Ltd. meeting its MMS and ECR requirements, CICA Ltd. would be permitted to distribute a dividend not exceeding i25% of its prior year's total statutory capital and surplus. Distributions in excess of this amount require the approval of the BMA. Further, CICA Ltd. must obtain the BMA’s prior approval before reducing its total statutory capital as shown in its previous financial year statutory balance sheet by i15%
or more. CICA Ltd. is also prohibited from declaring or paying any dividends unless the value of its long-term business assets exceeds its long-term business liabilities, as certified by its approved actuary, by the amount of the dividend and at least the MMS. These restrictions on declaring or paying dividends and distributions under the Bermuda Insurance Act of 1978 are in addition to those under Bermuda’s Companies Act 1981 which apply to all Bermuda companies. Based upon these rules, CICA Ltd. can pay a dividend of $i4.5
million without prior regulatory approval in 2021. iHowever, the BMA has requested that CICA Ltd. notify the Authority in advance of any potential dividend payments and any intercompany related payments or transactions.
The
BMA established risk-based regulatory capital adequacy and solvency margin requirements for Bermuda insurers that mandate that a Bermuda-domiciled subsidiary’s ECR be calculated by either: (a) Bermuda Solvency Capital Requirement ("BSCR"); or (b) an internal capital model that the BMA has approved for use for this purpose. CICA Ltd. uses the BSCR in calculating its solvency requirements. The Economic Balance Sheet ("EBS") framework is embedded as part of the BSCR and forms the basis of its ECR. CICA Ltd. held capital in excess of the BSCR requirements at December 31, 2020. The BMA is requiring Citizens and CICA Ltd. to enter into a “Keepwell Agreement”, which would encumber certain assets of the Company. The Keepwell Agreement will include a specific target solvency level at which the
Company would be required to make a capital injection into CICA Ltd.
On June 10, 2016, the NAIC Executive Committee and Plenary voted to adopt a recommendation for January 1, 2017 as the operative date for the implementation of Principles-Based Reserves (“PBR”) as a national standard for life insurance products. Although this NAIC standard does not change the reserving requirements under U.S. GAAP, it can be significant for many life insurers. PBR replaces the current formulaic approach to determining policy reserves with an approach that more closely reflects the risks of highly complex products. Companies will be expected to develop “right-sized” reserves that better align with their specific product features, their observed actuarial experience, and their overall
risk management procedures. PBR was required effective January 1, 2020. The Company filed a request for PBR exemption with the various state Departments of Insurance since all of our domestic insurance subsidiaries met the small company exemption outlined in the NAIC Valuation Manual, VM-20, for principle-based reserving.
(7)COMMITMENT AND CONTINGENCIES
i
QUALIFICATIONS
OF LIFE PRODUCTS
We have previously reported that a portion of the life insurance policies issued by our subsidiary insurance companies failed to qualify for the favorable U.S. federal income tax treatment afforded by Sections 7702 and 72(s) of the Internal Revenue Code ("IRC") of 1986. Further, we have determined that the structure of our policies sold to non-U.S. persons, which were novated to CICA Ltd. effective July 1, 2018, may have inadvertently generated U.S. source income over time, which subjected the Company to certain tax withholding and information reporting requirements under Chapters 3 or 4 of the IRC. For the novated policies sold to non-U.S. persons, we expect to settle any liabilities with the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS")
related to tax withholding and information reporting failures. The Company has continued to refine its estimate of the tax, penalty and interest exposure and expenses related to these tax issues, as described below for the current reporting period. The products have been and continue to be appropriately reported as life insurance under U.S. GAAP for financial reporting.
To remediate the noncompliance matter for the novated policies sold to non-U.S. persons as described above, the Company submitted withholding tax returns to the IRS in December 2019, followed by amended returns in August 2020. These withholding tax returns establish a total tax liability for calendar years 2014 through 2019 ("the covered period")
of $i7.3 million for a failure to withhold tax and report the U.S. source income generated by the novated policies, plus interest through August 28, 2020 in the amount of $i0.7 million.
To
date, the Company has paid $i8.0 million to the IRS for the covered period, $i6.0 million
of which was paid during 2020.
Note that these payments do not represent closure of the matter or IRS acceptance of the tax liability shown on the submitted withholding tax returns. The IRS is still reviewing our submission of the withholding tax returns relating to the novated policies and the IRS has the right to revise our total tax liability for the covered period. Thus, the probability weighted range of estimated financial liabilities related to this issue remains at $i7.3
million to $i52.5 million, after tax. This estimated range includes projected taxes and interest and penalties payable to the IRS, as
well as estimated increased payout obligations to current holders of non-compliant domestic life insurance policies expected to result from remediation of those policies.
Accruals
for loss contingencies are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The process of determining our best estimate and the estimated range is a complex undertaking including insight from external consultants and involved management’s judgment based upon a variety of factors known at the time. The amount of our liabilities and expenses depends on a number of uncertainties, including the number of prior tax years for which we may be liable to the IRS and the methodology applicable to the calculation of the tax liabilities for policies. Given the range of potential outcomes and the significant variables assumed in establishing our estimates, actual amounts incurred may exceed our reserve and could exceed the high end of our estimated range of liabilities and expenses. To the extent the amount reserved by the Company is insufficient
to meet the actual amount of our liabilities and expenses, or if our estimates of those liabilities and expenses change in the future, our financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected. Management believes that based upon current information, we have recorded the best estimate liability to date.
On May 17, 2017, we submitted an offer to enter into Closing Agreements with the IRS covering certain CICA and CNLIC domestic life insurance policies (the "Closing Agreements"), which was accepted by the IRS on June 7, 2019. Pursuant to the Closing Agreements, CICA and CNLIC agreed to pay the IRS $i123,779
and $i4,118, respectively, by August 6, 2019, and follow the corrective steps for the policies outlined in the Closing Agreements by September 5, 2019. These payments were made to the IRS on July 12, 2019. For certain life insurance policies that failed to satisfy the requirements of the cash value accumulation test of Section 7702 ("CVAT") of the IRC, we agreed to amend such policies retroactively
to their original dates of issue by adding an endorsement (which provides that the death benefit of such policies will not be less than the amount of life insurance necessary to maintain CVAT compliance). For the life insurance policies that failed to satisfy the premium requirements of the guideline premium test of Section 7702 of the IRC, we agreed as needed to refund each policyholder the amount of premiums paid that exceeded the guideline premium limitation plus interest thereon. We completed these corrective steps prior to September 5, 2019, the deadline set forth in the Closing Agreements.
LITIGATION AND REGULATORY ACTIONS
From time to time we are subject to legal and regulatory actions relating to our business. We defend all claims vigorously. As a result,
we incur defense costs, including attorneys' fees, other direct litigation costs and the expenditure of management time that otherwise would be devoted to our business. If we suffer an adverse judgment as a result of litigation claims, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The Company leases home office space in Austin, Texas for Citizens and in Bermuda for CICA Ltd. as well as several district office locations related to our Home Service Insurance segment across Louisiana, Mississippi and Arkansas, which are classified as operating leases. Certain operating leases include renewal options that extend the lease term. The exercise of lease
renewal options is at our sole discretion when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise such option. The Company also has a minimal amount of finance leases regarding equipment. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are immaterial to the consolidated financial statements and are recognized as lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term and not recorded on the consolidated financial statements.
i
The table below summarizes
the number of weighted-average years remaining in our operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2020.
Maturities
of our remaining operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2020 are as follows.
(In thousands)
Operating Lease Payments
Maturity of operating lease liabilities
2021
$
i1,430
2022
i1,272
2023
i1,271
2024
i1,302
2025
i1,335
After
2025
i6,936
Total operating lease payments
i13,546
Interest
expense
(i1,577)
Present value of operating lease liabilities
$
i11,969
/
We
recorded the lease right-of-use asset in Other Assets and the lease liability in Other Liabilities using a weighted average discount rate of i4.19%. Cash payments related to the operating lease liabilities were $i1.3
million and $i1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 and were reported in operating cash flows.
In January 2019, the Company entered into a long-term lease agreement with an unrelated party for its new home office in Austin, Texas. The
Company recognized the related lease right-of-use asset and liability of $i11.9 million during the second quarter of 2020 and moved into its new home office in November 2020.
The Company does not engage in lease agreements among related parties.
As of December 31,
2020, CICA Ltd. is committed to fund investments up to $i68.6 million related to private equity funds. We also paid $i8.8
million to our former Chief Executive Officer, Geoffrey Kolander, in February 2021 representing the severance payments due to him under the terms of his employment agreement in connection with his resignation following a change in control of the Company.
(8) SEGMENT AND OTHER OPERATING INFORMATION
i
The
Company has itwo reportable segments: Life Insurance and Home Service Insurance. Our Life Insurance segment primarily issues endowment contracts, which are principally accumulation contracts that incorporate an element of life insurance protection and ordinary whole life insurance, to non-U.S. residents through CICA Ltd. These
contracts are designed to provide a fixed amount of insurance coverage over the life of the insured and may utilize rider benefits to provide additional coverage and annuity benefits to enhance accumulations. CICA and CNLIC issued ordinary whole-life, credit life and disability and accident and health related policies, throughout the Midwest and southern U.S. until they ceased most domestic sales beginning January 1, 2017.
Our domestic Home Service Insurance segment operates through our subsidiaries SPLIC, MGLIC and SPFIC, and focuses on the life insurance needs of the middle- and lower-income markets, primarily in Louisiana, Mississippi and Arkansas. Our
policies are sold and serviced through over i175 funeral homes and i240 independent agents who sell policies, collect premiums and service policyholders. To a lesser extent, our Home Service Insurance segment sells limited liability,
named peril property policies covering dwelling and contents.
The Life Insurance and Home Service Insurance portions of the Company constitute separate businesses. In addition to the Life Insurance and Home Service Insurance business, the Company also operates other non-insurance portions of the Company ("Other Non-Insurance Enterprises"), which primarily include the Company’s IT and Corporate-support functions that are included in the tables presented below to properly reconcile the segment information with the consolidated financial statements of the
Company.
The
accounting policies of the reportable segments and Other Non-Insurance Enterprises are presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP and are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company evaluates profit and loss performance based on U.S. GAAP net income before federal income taxes for its two reportable segments.
iThe
Company's Other Non-Insurance Enterprises represents the only difference between segments and reported consolidated operations.
The following table sets forth, by country, the Company's annual total of earned premiums from geographic area for the years indicated:
Years ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Area:
United
States
$
i52,667
i53,656
i53,836
Colombia
i25,783
i26,768
i27,605
Venezuela
i19,956
i22,353
i24,783
Taiwan
i19,078
i19,403
i18,888
Ecuador
i13,301
i14,198
i15,187
Argentina
i9,175
i10,069
i9,960
Other
foreign countries
i38,993
i40,562
i41,302
Net
reinsurance
(i3,624)
(i2,662)
(i3,701)
Total
premiums
$
i175,329
i184,347
i187,860
/
(9)INCOME
TAXES
iCICA Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Citizens, is considered a controlled foreign corporation for federal income tax purposes. As a result, the insurance activity of CICA Ltd. is subject to Subpart F of the IRC and is included in Citizens’ taxable income and due to the i0%
enacted tax rate in Bermuda there are ino deferred taxes recorded for CICA Ltd.'s temporary differences. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, the Subpart F income inclusion generated $i2.2 million,
$i5.9 million and $i18.4 million of federal income tax expense, respectively. /
The
components of deferred federal income taxes are as follows:
December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
Deferred tax assets:
Future policy benefit reserves
$
i2,657
i2,641
Net
operating and capital loss carryforwards
i1,395
i230
Accrued
policyholder dividends and expenses
i124
i—
Investments
i147
i702
Deferred
intercompany loss
i2,002
i3,539
Accrued
compensation
i513
i—
Lease
liability
i2,514
i238
Other
i584
i700
Total
gross deferred tax assets
i9,936
i8,050
Deferred
tax liabilities:
DAC, COIA and intangible assets
(i8,693)
(i8,417)
Unrealized
gains on investments available-for-sale
(i4,522)
(i7,300)
Tax
reserves transition liability
(i3,736)
(i4,483)
Right-of-use
lease asset
(i2,514)
(i238)
Other
(i35)
(i40)
Total
gross deferred tax liabilities
(i19,500)
(i20,478)
Net
deferred tax liability
$
(i9,564)
(i12,428)
/
i
A
summary of the changes in the components of deferred federal and state income taxes is as follows:
December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
Deferred federal and state income taxes:
Balance
January 1,
$
(i12,428)
(i5,709)
Deferred
tax benefit (expense)
i402
(i1,573)
Investments
available-for-sale
i2,774
(i5,129)
Effects
of unrealized gains on DAC, COIA and reserves
(i391)
(i17)
Adoption
of ASU 2016-13
i79
i—
Balance
December 31,
$
(i9,564)
(i12,428)
/
The
Company and our subsidiaries have net operating loss carryforwards of $i6.6 million at December 31, 2020 which will begin expiring in 2036. MGLIC joined the Company's consolidated tax return filing group in 2020 and had a $i1.1
million net operating loss carryforward at January 1, 2020, which will begin expiring in 2036. The MGLIC net operating losses were incurred while it was owned by the Company; thus, there will be no IRC Section 382 limit on the utilization of these net operating losses.
At December 31, 2020 and 2019, we determined that as a result of our taxable capital gain income in carryback periods, the expected reversal of existing deferred tax liabilities, and tax planning strategies, it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets would be realized. Thus, the Company holds iino/
valuation allowance in operations or other comprehensive income at December 31, 2020 and 2019.
The
Company recognizes only the impact of tax positions that, based on their technical merits, are more likely than not to be sustained upon an audit by the taxing authority.
i
A reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
Years
ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Balance at January 1,
$
i45,989
i44,841
i95,831
Additions
for tax positions of prior years
i1
i1,148
i2,268
Reductions
for tax positions of prior years
i—
i—
(i53,258)
Balance
December 31,
$
i45,990
i45,989
i44,841
/
This
unrecognized tax benefit is reported net in current federal income tax payable on the consolidated balance sheets. Included in these amounts are $i9.9 million, $i9.9
million and $i8.8 million of interest expense with respect to unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
The Company’s unrecognized tax benefits at December 31,
2020 would affect the effective tax rate if recognized. The Company believes it is reasonably possible that all but $i1.0 million of the total amount of uncertain tax benefits will decrease within the next twelve months.
The Company’s practice is to recognize interest and penalties related to income
tax matters in income tax expense. In the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), the amount of interest expense recorded was $i0.0 million, $i1.1
million and $i2.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act ("CARES Act") was enacted on March 27, 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The CARES Act, among other things, permits net operating
losses incurred in 2018, 2019 and 2020 to be carried back to each of the five preceding taxable years to generate a refund of previously paid income taxes. As a result of the CARES Act, it is anticipated that the Company will be able to claim a net refund for $i1.0 million of taxes paid in preceding years. The
financial statements have been updated to reflect the benefit of the anticipated carryback claim accordingly.
The Consolidated Appropriations Act (the "CAA") was enacted on December 27, 2020. The Company does not expect the CAA to have a material impact on the financial statements and will continue to analyze.
The Company's Federal income tax return is filed on a consolidated basis with the following entities:
Citizens, Inc.
CICA Life Insurance Company
of America
Citizens National Life Insurance Company
Magnolia Guaranty Life Insurance Company
Security Plan Life Insurance Company
Security Plan Fire Insurance Company
Computing Technology, Inc.
The method of allocation among companies is subject to a written tax sharing agreement, approved by the Board of Directors, whereby allocation is made primarily on a separate return basis pursuant to the wait-and-see method. Under this method, consolidated group members are not given current credit or refunds for net operating losses until taxable income on a separate return basis is generated. Intercompany tax balances are settled at least annually.
The
Company and our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction and various U.S. states. None of our subsidiaries are subject to examination by U.S. tax authorities for years prior to 2017.
The
changes in the components of other comprehensive income (loss) are reported net of the effects of income taxes of 21% in 2020, 2019 and 2018, as indicated below.
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period
$
(i34,357)
i6,520
(i27,837)
Reclassification
adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income
(i953)
i200
(i753)
Unrealized
gain from held-to-maturity transferred to available-for-sale
i3,588
(i218)
i3,370
Effects
on DAC
i223
(i123)
i100
Effects
on COIA
i184
(i87)
i97
Effects
on unearned revenue reserves
(i277)
i172
(i105)
Other
comprehensive income (loss)
$
(i31,592)
i6,464
(i25,128)
//
(11)STOCK
COMPENSATION
iIn 2020, 2019 and 2018, the Company's Board of Directors approved awards of restricted stock units under the Citizens, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan for non-employee directors and the executive management team. Vesting of the units is subject to the recipient’s continued service or employment with the
Company through the applicable vesting date, which is one year for directors and two years for employees. In addition, the Board also approved equity grants for other employees with a delegation to the President and Chief Executive Officer to determine the participant and values to be awarded. There are ithree million shares that may be granted under the plan./
(1)
Fair value per share of restricted stock units was equal to Grant Date fair value per share, which was calculated based on the closing price of the Company's Class A common stock on the NYSE on the grant date, in accordance with ASC Topic 718.
/
As of December 31, 2020, we recognized $i2.4
million of expense, while $i0.5 million was unrecognized and is expected to be amortized up to i1.30
years.
Restricted stock unit awards give the participant the right to receive common stock in the future, subject to certain restrictions and a risk of forfeiture. Forfeitures are recognized in the period they occur. Compensation expense of $i2.2 million, $i2.1
million and $i0.4 million was recognized as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, related to these awards.
Under the terms of an employment agreement in connection with his resignation following a change in control of the
Company, all of the outstanding restricted stock units granted to our former Chief Executive Officer, Geoffrey Kolander, immediately vested during 2020.
(12)BENEFIT PLANS
i
The Company
sponsors a defined contribution retirement plan. The plan was initially established as the Citizens, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan and was restated as the Citizens, Inc. 401(k) Retirement and Profit Sharing Plan effective March 1, 2016. There have been iiino//
profit sharing contributions since 2014.
On January 1, 2019, the 401(k) plan was amended to allow employees who have completed three months of service to participate in the plan. Prior to that date, a year of service was required before participation. Contributions are made by employees and the Company provides a matching contribution based upon the employee's level of contribution. The Company's expense was $i0.8
million, $i0.8 million and $i0.7 million in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
The
Company is primarily self-insured for employee health benefits. The Company records its self-insurance liability based on an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. There is stop-loss coverage for amounts in excess of $i120,000 per individual per year. If more claims are made than were estimated or if the costs of actual claims increase beyond what was anticipated, reserves recorded may not be sufficient and additional accruals may be required in future
periods.
The
Company has various routine related party transactions in conjunction with our holding company structure, such as a management service agreement related to costs incurred, a tax sharing agreement between entities, and inter-company dividends and capital contributions. A reinsurance assumption and novation transaction was completed effective July 1, 2018 between CICA and CICA Ltd. to transfer the international policies from CICA to CICA Ltd., the newly formed Bermuda entity. There were no changes related to these relationships during the year ended December 31, 2020.
CHANGE IN CONTROL
On July 29, 2020, a change in control of the
Company occurred, and the Harold E. Riley Foundation (the “Foundation”), a charitable organization established under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, is now the owner of 100% of the Company’s Class B common stock.
Prior to the change in control, the Harold E. Riley Trust (the “Trust”) was the beneficial owner of 100% of the Company’s Class B common stock. The Trust documents provided that upon Harold Riley’s death, which occurred in 2017, the Class B common stock would transfer from the Trust to the Foundation. Because the Class B common stock elects a simple majority of the Board of Directors of the Company, this
transfer constitutes an acquisition of control by the Foundation, which requires prior regulatory approvals by the insurance regulators of Colorado, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas, the states in which the Company's insurance subsidiaries are domiciled.
RESIGNATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
On July 29, 2020, following the change in control of the Company, Mr. Kolander notified the Company of his intention to resign from his position as Chief
Executive Officer and President and as a member of the Board of Directors, and terminated the Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Mr. Kolander dated January 1, 2019 (the “2019 Employment Agreement”). Pursuant to Sections 1(e) and 6(g) of the 2019 Employment Agreement, Mr. Kolander terminated the 2019 Employment Agreement due to a “change in control,” which occurred upon the regulatory approval of the transfer of the Company’s Class B Shares from the Trust to the Foundation. Mr. Kolander’s resignation and separation from employment and a member of the Board of Directors was effective August 5, 2020.
In
connection with Mr. Kolander’s resignation and separation from employment, Mr. Kolander signed a Chief Executive Officer Separation of Service and Consulting Agreement (the “Separation and Consulting Agreement”) with the Company and the Release attached as Exhibit “A” thereto, each dated July 29, 2020. Because Mr. Kolander signed the Release, pursuant to Sections 6(g) and (h) of the 2019 Employment Agreement, Mr. Kolander was entitled to the cash severance amount set forth in Sections 6(g) and (h) of the 2019 Employment Agreement (which equaled $i8.8
million), less required withholdings and deductions. Additionally, all outstanding Restricted Stock Units held by Mr. Kolander were fully vested on August 5, 2020. In accordance with the 2019 Employment Agreement, the cash severance amount was paid on February 8, 2021. These amounts were expensed in 2020.
To assist in the orderly transition of his duties and responsibilities, Mr. Kolander entered into the Separation and Consulting Agreement with the Company. Under the Separation and Consulting Agreement, Mr. Kolander agreed to provide leadership transition guidance and business continuity assistance to the Company as a consultant
after the separation date through March 9, 2021. Mr. Kolander provided no more than i14 hours of consulting services per week at a rate of $i14,000 per week. The
above summary of the Separation and Consulting Agreement is qualified by reference in its entirety to the Separation and Consulting Agreement, which was filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 30, 2020.
APPOINTMENT OF INTERIM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
On July 29, 2020, the Board of Directors appointed Gerald W. Shields, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, as Interim Chief Executive Officer, which became effective upon Mr. Kolander’s separation from employment. Following his appointment, Mr. Shields continues to serve as Vice
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
but
stepped down from the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Executive Committee as of such date.
(14)QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Unaudited)
ii
The
following table contains selected unaudited financial data for each quarter.
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Fourth Quarter
Third Quarter
Second Quarter
First Quarter
2020
Revenues
$
i64,968
i59,825
i58,341
i55,722
Benefits
and expenses
i67,317
i67,996
i57,903
i57,957
Federal
income tax expense (benefit)
(i3,887)
(i256)
i1,465
i1,349
Net
income (loss)
i1,538
(i7,915)
(i1,027)
(i3,584)
Net
income (loss) available to common shareholders
i1,538
(i7,915)
(i1,027)
(i3,584)
Basic
& Diluted earnings (losses) per share of Class A common stock
i0.03
(i0.16)
(i0.02)
(i0.07)
Basic
& Diluted earnings (losses) per share of Class B common stock
i0.01
(i0.07)
(i0.01)
(i0.04)
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Fourth Quarter
Third Quarter
Second Quarter
First Quarter
2019
Revenues
$
i69,806
i61,467
i56,866
i62,406
Benefits
and expenses
i64,878
i59,335
i60,189
i60,398
Federal
income tax expense (benefit)
(i23)
i86
i1,242
i5,810
Net
income (loss)
i4,951
i2,046
(i4,565)
(i3,802)
Net
income (loss) available to common shareholders
i4,951
i2,046
(i4,565)
(i3,802)
Basic
& Diluted earnings (losses) per share of Class A common stock
i0.10
i0.04
(i0.09)
(i0.08)
Basic
& Diluted earnings (losses) per share of Class B common stock
i0.05
i0.02
(i0.04)
(i0.04)
//
(15)SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
i
The Company has evaluated the impact of subsequent events as defined by the accounting guidance through the date this report was issued.
On February 6, 2021, Baylor University and Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, the two sole charitable
beneficiaries of the Foundation (the “Foundation Beneficiaries”) gained control of the Foundation and entered into a Mutual Agreement for Compromise, Settlement and Release with the Company and its individual directors (the “Foundation Settlement Agreement”) to resolve the litigation that had been filed by the Foundation against the Company and its eight individual board members captioned Harold E. Riley Foundation v. Claus, et al. in the District Court (the “Colorado Court”) for Arapahoe County, Colorado (the “Colorado Litigation”). On February 10, 2021, the Colorado Court entered an order granting final approval of the Foundation Settlement Agreement.
The
Foundation Settlement Agreement, among other things, provided for certain governance arrangements, including certifying the Company's board membership as it existed as of August 12, 2020, as well as the repurchase by the Company of all of the Company's shares of Class B common stock held by the Foundation.
On February 5, 2021, the Company also entered into a Mutual Agreement for Compromise,
Settlement and Release (the “Hughes-Hott-Boto Settlement Agreement”) with Michael C. Hughes, Charles W. Hott and David A. Boto as officers or trustees of the Foundation.The Hughes-Hott-Boto Settlement Agreement dismissed the counterclaims and third-party claims in the Colorado Litigation filed by the Company and resolved potential claims which could have been made against the Foundation, Mr. Hott, Mr. Hughes and Mr. Boto.
On February 6, 2021, pursuant to the Foundation Settlement Agreement, the Company entered into an agreement with the Foundation to purchase all of
the Company's shares of Class B common stock for a purchase price of $i9.1 million (the “B Share Transaction”). The Company and the Foundation are seeking the required regulatory approvals in order to consummate the Class B Share Transaction. On March 5, 2021, the
Company paid the purchase price to the Foundation to hold in escrow until such regulatory approvals are obtained.
Unrealized
investment gains on securities held by parent and subsidiaries, net of tax
i128,255
i77,117
Treasury
stock
(i11,011)
(i11,011)
Total
stockholders' equity
i300,945
i259,836
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
$
i311,235
i264,902
(1)
Eliminated in consolidation.
Note to Schedule II:
Citizens, Inc.'s investments in consolidated subsidiaries are stated at cost plus equity in undistributed income of consolidated subsidiaries. The Company includes in its Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) dividends from its subsidiaries and equity in income (loss) of consolidated subsidiaries,
which represents the net income (loss) of each of its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Schedule II, Continued Condensed Financial Information of Registrant CITIZENS, INC. (Parent Company) Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Years
ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Comprehensive income (loss):
Revenues:
Management service fees (1)
$
i32,828
i43,694
i43,323
Investment
income
i11,253
i1,685
i1,086
Other
i3
i2
i1
Realized
investment gains (losses)
(i62)
(i3,013)
(i196)
Total
revenues
i44,022
i42,368
i44,214
Expenses:
General
expenses
i49,747
i46,020
i44,009
Taxes,
licenses and fees
i189
i146
i761
Total
expenses
i49,936
i46,166
i44,770
Income
(loss) before federal income tax expense (benefit) and equity in income (loss) of consolidated subsidiaries
(i5,914)
(i3,798)
(i556)
Federal
income tax expense (benefit)
(i5,583)
(i4,491)
(i185)
Income
(loss) before equity in income (loss) of consolidated subsidiaries
(i331)
i693
(i371)
Equity
in income (loss) of consolidated subsidiaries
(i10,657)
(i2,063)
(i10,691)
Net
loss
(i10,988)
(i1,370)
(i11,062)
Other
comprehensive income (loss)
i51,138
i71,751
(i25,128)
Total
comprehensive income (loss)
$
i40,150
i70,381
(i36,190)
(1)
Eliminated in consolidation.
Note to Schedule II:
Citizens, Inc.'s investments in consolidated subsidiaries are stated at cost plus equity in undistributed income of consolidated subsidiaries. The Company includes in its Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) dividends from its subsidiaries and equity in income (loss) of consolidated subsidiaries,
which represents the net income (loss) of each of its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Schedule II, Continued Condensed Financial Information of Registrant CITIZENS, INC. (Parent Company) Statements of Cash Flows
Years ended December 31, (In
thousands)
2020
2019
2018
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)
$
(i10,988)
(i1,370)
(i11,062)
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Realized investment losses (gains), net
i62
i3,013
i196
Equity
in loss (income) of consolidated subsidiaries
i10,657
i2,063
i10,691
Change
in accrued expenses and other liabilities
i11,629
(i6,530)
(i2,036)
Change
in federal income tax payable
(i17,647)
i—
i—
Deferred
federal income tax expense (benefit)
i79
i—
i—
Amortization
of premiums and discounts on investments
i535
i496
i567
Depreciation
i133
i267
i356
Change
in accrued investment income
i64
(i5)
(i46)
Stock-based
compensation
i2,223
i2,099
i—
Decrease
(increase) in receivable from subsidiaries and other assets
(i141)
i1,101
i382
Other,
net
(i3,896)
(i248)
i22
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
(i7,290)
i886
(i930)
Cash
flows from investing activities:
Purchases of fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale
(i4,628)
(i12,970)
(i11,871)
Maturities
of fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale
i7,114
i691
i7,160
Purchase
of equity securities
(i250)
i—
i—
Sales
of fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale
i5,735
i4,268
i1,366
Sales
of property and equipment
i11
i14
i103
Purchases
of other long-term investments
(i8,790)
i—
i—
Purchases
of property and equipment
(i60)
(i85)
(i60)
Purchases
of short-term investments
i—
(i2,456)
(i7,850)
Maturities
of short-term investments
i1,300
i9,090
i—
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
i432
(i1,448)
(i11,152)
Cash
flows from financing activities:
Other
(i869)
(i377)
i—
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
(i869)
(i377)
i—
Net
increase (decrease) in cash
(i7,727)
(i939)
(i12,082)
Cash
at beginning of year
i10,829
i11,768
i23,850
Cash
at end of year
$
i3,102
i10,829
i11,768
Note
to Schedule II:
Citizens, Inc.'s investments in consolidated subsidiaries are stated at cost plus equity in undistributed income of consolidated subsidiaries. The Company includes in its Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) dividends from its subsidiaries and equity in income (loss) of consolidated subsidiaries, which represents the net income (loss) of each of its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
For
the Company's short duration contracts (property), written premium is not materially different from earned premium, therefore only earned premiums are detailed in Schedule IV.
Inline XBRL for the cover page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, filed electronically herewith, included in the Exhibit 101 Inline XBRL Document Set.
†
Indicates
management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Gerald W. Shields and James A. Eliasberg, jointly and severally, his or her attorneys-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for him or her in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated and on March 10, 2021.