Document/ExhibitDescriptionPagesSize 1: 10-K Annual Report HTML 1.45M
2: EX-21.1 Subsidiaries List HTML 32K
3: EX-23 Consent of Expert or Counsel HTML 30K
4: EX-31.1 Certification -- §302 - SOA'02 HTML 34K
5: EX-31.2 Certification -- §302 - SOA'02 HTML 34K
6: EX-32.1 Certification -- §906 - SOA'02 HTML 32K
7: EX-32.2 Certification -- §906 - SOA'02 HTML 32K
13: R1 Cover HTML 96K
14: R2 Audit Information HTML 36K
15: R3 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS and HTML 117K
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Loss)
16: R4 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS and HTML 32K
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Loss) (Parenthetical)
17: R5 Consolidated Balance Sheets HTML 159K
18: R6 Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) HTML 48K
19: R7 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders? Equity HTML 113K
(Deficit)
20: R8 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows HTML 187K
21: R9 Description of Business HTML 43K
22: R10 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 86K
23: R11 Reverse Recapitalization HTML 134K
24: R12 Investment in Convertible Notes HTML 38K
25: R13 Property and Equipment HTML 47K
26: R14 Route and Customer Acquisition Costs HTML 43K
27: R15 Location Contracts Acquired HTML 44K
28: R16 Goodwill HTML 40K
29: R17 Debt HTML 71K
30: R18 Business and Asset Acquisitions HTML 134K
31: R19 Contingent Earnout Share Liability HTML 42K
32: R20 Warrant Liability HTML 36K
33: R21 Fair Value Measurements HTML 104K
34: R22 Stockholders? Equity HTML 47K
35: R23 Gaming Terminal Fees HTML 34K
36: R24 Employee Benefit Plans HTML 38K
37: R25 Stock-based Compensation HTML 100K
38: R26 Income Taxes HTML 93K
39: R27 Commitments and Contingencies HTML 49K
40: R28 Related-Party Transactions HTML 38K
41: R29 Earnings Per Share HTML 53K
42: R30 Subsequent Events HTML 34K
43: R31 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 129K
(Policies)
44: R32 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 57K
(Tables)
45: R33 Reverse Recapitalization (Tables) HTML 54K
46: R34 Property and Equipment (Tables) HTML 50K
47: R35 Route and Customer Acquisition Costs (Tables) HTML 37K
48: R36 Location Contracts Acquired (Tables) HTML 45K
49: R37 Goodwill (Tables) HTML 37K
50: R38 Debt (Tables) HTML 58K
51: R39 Business and Asset Acquisitions (Tables) HTML 91K
52: R40 Fair Value Measurements (Tables) HTML 97K
53: R41 Stockholders? Equity (Tables) HTML 42K
54: R42 Stock-based Compensation (Tables) HTML 101K
55: R43 Income Taxes (Tables) HTML 92K
56: R44 Commitments and Contingencies (Tables) HTML 38K
57: R45 Earnings Per Share (Tables) HTML 51K
58: R46 Description of Business (Details) HTML 52K
59: R47 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - HTML 44K
Adopted accounting pronouncements (Details)
60: R48 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - HTML 53K
Change in estimate (Details)
61: R49 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - HTML 50K
Schedule of property and equipment useful lives
(Details)
62: R50 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Route HTML 34K
and customer acquisition costs (Details)
63: R51 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - HTML 34K
Location contracts acquired (Details)
64: R52 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - HTML 32K
Advertising costs (Details)
65: R53 Reverse Recapitalization - Narrative (Details) HTML 85K
66: R54 Reverse Recapitalization - Schedule of Proceeds HTML 58K
from Reverse Capitalization (Details)
67: R55 Reverse Recapitalization - Schedule of Equity HTML 54K
Interests Issued from Reverse Capitalization
(Details)
68: R56 Investment in Convertible Notes (Details) HTML 46K
69: R57 Property and Equipment (Details) HTML 62K
70: R58 Route and Customer Acquisition Costs - Narrative HTML 49K
(Details)
71: R59 Route and Customer Acquisition Costs - Schedule of HTML 36K
Customer Contract Acquired (Details)
72: R60 Location Contracts Acquired - Schedule of Customer HTML 37K
Contract Acquired (Details)
73: R61 Location Contracts Acquired - Additional HTML 46K
Information (Details)
74: R62 Location Contracts Acquired - Schedule of HTML 46K
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets Amortization
Expense (Details)
75: R63 Goodwill - Narrative (Details) HTML 41K
76: R64 Goodwill - Schedule of changes in Goodwill, HTML 36K
Rollforward (Details)
77: R65 Debt - Schedule of Long-term Debt Instruments HTML 52K
(Details)
78: R66 Debt - Narrative (Details) HTML 115K
79: R67 Debt - Schedule of Maturities of Long-term Debt HTML 48K
(Details)
80: R68 Debt - Schedule of Carrying Value and Estimated HTML 37K
Fair Value (Details)
81: R69 Business and Asset Acquisitions - Narrative HTML 199K
(Details)
82: R70 Business and Asset Acquisitions - Schedule of HTML 67K
Consideration Transferred - AVG (Details)
83: R71 Business and Asset Acquisitions - Schedule of HTML 69K
Consideration Transferred - Grand River Jackpot
(Details)
84: R72 Business and Asset Acquisitions - Schedule of HTML 35K
Unaudited Pro Forma Results (Details)
85: R73 Business and Asset Acquisitions - Schedule of HTML 64K
Consideration Payable (Details)
86: R74 Contingent Earnout Share Liability (Details) HTML 77K
87: R75 Warrant Liability (Details) HTML 57K
88: R76 Fair Value Measurements - Schedule of Fair Value HTML 44K
Measurements, Assets (Details)
89: R77 Fair Value Measurements - Schedule of Unobservable HTML 38K
Input Asset Value Reconciliation (Details)
90: R78 Fair Value Measurements - Schedule of Fair Value HTML 51K
Measurements, Liabilities Measured on a Recurring
Basis (Details)
91: R79 Fair Value Measurements - Schedule of Fair Value HTML 41K
Measurements, Contingent Considerations (Details)
92: R80 Fair Value Measurements - Narrative (Details) HTML 32K
93: R81 Stockholders? Equity - Narrative (Details) HTML 87K
94: R82 Stockholders? Equity - Schedule of Stock Reserved HTML 39K
for Issuance (Details)
95: R83 Gaming Terminal Fees (Details) HTML 36K
96: R84 Employee Benefit Plans (Details) HTML 49K
97: R85 Stock-based Compensation - Narrative (Details) HTML 101K
98: R86 Stock-based Compensation - Schedule of Assumptions HTML 49K
for Options Granted (Details)
99: R87 Stock-based Compensation - Summary of Options HTML 42K
Granted and Range in Vesting Periods (Details)
100: R88 Stock-based Compensation - Schedule of Vested HTML 65K
Stock Options (Details)
101: R89 Stock-based Compensation - Summary of Nonvested HTML 50K
Stock Options (Details)
102: R90 Stock-based Compensation - Schedule of Nonvested HTML 55K
RSU Activity (Details)
103: R91 Income Taxes - Narrative (Details) HTML 42K
104: R92 Income Taxes - Schedule of Components of Income HTML 54K
Tax Expense (Details)
105: R93 Income Taxes - Reconciliation of Expected Income HTML 57K
Taxes (Details)
106: R94 Income Taxes - Schedule of Deferred Tax Assets and HTML 55K
Liabilities (Details)
107: R95 Income Taxes - Summary of Carryforwards of Net HTML 36K
Operating Losses (Details)
108: R96 Commitments and Contingencies - Narrative HTML 45K
(Details)
109: R97 Commitments and Contingencies - Schedule of Future HTML 45K
Minimum Payments (Details)
110: R98 Related-Party Transactions (Details) HTML 89K
111: R99 Earnings Per Share (Details) HTML 75K
112: R100 Subsequent Events (Details) HTML 33K
113: R9999 Uncategorized Items - acel-20211231.htm HTML 49K
116: XML IDEA XML File -- Filing Summary XML 218K
114: XML XBRL Instance -- acel-20211231_htm XML 2.67M
115: EXCEL IDEA Workbook of Financial Reports XLSX 164K
9: EX-101.CAL XBRL Calculations -- acel-20211231_cal XML 277K
10: EX-101.DEF XBRL Definitions -- acel-20211231_def XML 975K
11: EX-101.LAB XBRL Labels -- acel-20211231_lab XML 2.42M
12: EX-101.PRE XBRL Presentations -- acel-20211231_pre XML 1.55M
8: EX-101.SCH XBRL Schema -- acel-20211231 XSD 269K
117: JSON XBRL Instance as JSON Data -- MetaLinks 559± 828K
118: ZIP XBRL Zipped Folder -- 0001698991-22-000004-xbrl Zip 642K
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
iDelaware
i98-1350261
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
i140 Tower Drive
iBurr
Ridge, iIllinois
i60527
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)
(i630)
i972-2235
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Trading Symbols
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
iClass
A-1 Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share
iACEL
iThe New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check
mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐iNo☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐iNo☒
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. iYes☒ No ☐
Indicate by
check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). iYes☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”“accelerated filer,”“smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
☐
iAccelerated
filer
☒
Non-accelerated filer
☐
Smaller reporting company
i☐
Emerging growth company
i☒
If
an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. i☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment
of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. i☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes i☐ No ☒
As
of June 30, 2021, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s Class A ordinary shares outstanding held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $i651.7 million based on the closing
price of such stock as reported on The New York Stock Exchange on such date.
As of March 7, 2022, there were i92,772,928 shares outstanding of the registrant’s Class A-1 Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share.
iPortions
of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, where indicated. Such Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the registrant's fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements, other than statements of historical fact, contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, statements regarding our strategy, prospects, plans, objectives, future operations, future revenue and earnings, projected margins and expenses, markets for our services, potential acquisitions or strategic alliances, financial position, and liquidity and anticipated cash needs and availability. The words “anticipates,”“believes,”“estimates,”“expects,”“intends,”“may,”“plans,”“projects,”“will,”“would,” and similar expressions or the negatives thereof are intended to identify forward-looking statements. However, not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These forward-looking statements represent our current reasonable expectations and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance and achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We cannot guarantee the accuracy of the forward-looking statements, and you should be aware that results and events could differ materially and adversely from those contained in the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors including, but not limited to, those described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Furthermore,
such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except as required by law, we do not undertake publicly to update or revise these statements, even if experience or future changes make it clear that any projected results expressed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or future quarterly reports, press releases or company statements will not be realized. In addition, the inclusion of any statement in this Annual Report on Form 10-K does not constitute an admission by us that the events or circumstances described in such statement are material. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. In addition, the industry in which we operate is subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors including those described in the section entitled “Risk Factors.” These and other
factors could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K concerning our industry and the markets in which we operate, including our general expectations and market position, market opportunity, and market size, is based on information from various sources, on assumptions that we have made that are based on those data and other similar sources, and on our knowledge of the markets for our services. This information includes a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such information. In addition, projections, assumptions, and estimates of our future performance and the future performance of the industry in which we operate are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in
the section entitled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These and other factors could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in the estimates made by third parties and by us.
Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this document to “Accel,” the "Company,"“our company,”“we,”“us,”“our,” and similar names refer to Accel Entertainment, Inc. and, where appropriate, its subsidiaries.
We believe we are the leading distributed gaming operator in the United States on an Adjusted EBITDA basis, and a preferred partner for local business owners in the Illinois market. Our business consists of the installation, maintenance and operation of gaming terminals, redemption devices that disburse winnings and contain automated teller machine (“ATM”) functionality, and other amusement devices in authorized non-casino locations such as restaurants, bars, taverns, convenience stores, liquor stores, truck stops, and grocery stores, which are referred to collectively as “licensed establishments.” We also operate
stand-alone ATMs in gaming and non-gaming locations. Accel has been licensed by the Illinois Gaming Board (the “IGB”) since 2012 and holds a license from the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (the “PA Board”). In July 2020, the Georgia Lottery Corporation (the “GLC”) approved one of our consolidated subsidiaries as a licensed operator, or a Master Licensee, which allows us to install and operate coin operated amusement machines for commercial use by the public for play throughout the State of Georgia. On December 30, 2021, one of the Company's consolidated subsidiaries acquired amusement
operations in Iowa and registered with the Iowa Department of Inspection (the “IDIA”) to conduct operations in Iowa.
Our gaming-as-a-service platform provides local businesses with a turnkey, capital efficient gaming solution. We own all of our gaming equipment and manage the entire operating process for our licensed establishment partners. We also offer our licensed establishment partners gaming solutions that appeal to players who patronize those businesses. We devote significant resources to licensed establishment partner retention, and seek to provide prompt, personalized player service and support, which we believe is unparalleled among other distributed gaming operators. Dedicated relationship managers assist licensed establishment partners with regulatory applications and compliance onboarding, train licensed establishment partners on how to engage with players and potential players, monitor individual gaming
areas for compliance, cleanliness and comfort and recommend potential changes to improve both player gaming experience and overall revenue for each licensed establishment. We also provide weekly gaming revenue reports to our licensed establishment partners and analyze and compare gaming results within individual licensed establishment partners. This information is used to determine an optimal selection of games, layouts and other ideas to generate foot traffic for our licensed establishment partners with the goal of generating increased gaming revenue. Further, our in-house collections and security personnel provide highly secure cash transportation and vault management services. Our best-in-class technicians ensure minimal downtime through proactive service and routine maintenance. As a result, Accel’s voluntary contract renewal rate was approximately 99% for the three-year period
ended December 31, 2021.
In addition to our gaming business, we also install, operate and service redemption devices that have ATM functionality, stand-alone ATMs and amusement devices, including jukeboxes, dartboards, pool tables, pinball machines and other related entertainment equipment. These operations provide a complementary source of lead generation for our gaming business by offering a “one-stop” source of additional equipment for its licensed establishment partners.
Our Industry
We operate within the U.S. distributed gaming industry, which consists of the installation and service of slot machines at non-casino licensed establishments. Generally, a gaming terminal or slot machine is any electronic video game machine that, upon insertion of cash, electronic cards or vouchers,
or any combination thereof, is available to play or simulate the play of a video game, including but not limited to video poker and slots, and utilizes a video display and microprocessors in which players may receive free games or credits that can be redeemed for cash or merchandise. Distributed gaming is currently legal in Illinois, Louisiana, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota and West Virginia. Other states such as Georgia, Iowa and Nebraska have a similar but separately regulated amusement machine market. We believe that the distributed gaming industry is supported by generally favorable trends, including an increasing number of states contemplating approving gaming to increase tax revenues, broader acceptance in the U.S. of gaming generally, including online and digital gaming, an aging population that appreciates the convenience of gaming entertainment close to home, expected resilience through economic downturns and attractive revenue and return
on invested capital profiles when compared to traditional gaming venues, such as casinos. We
believe that the industry has witnessed both a growing player base and increased variety of higher quality game profiles available through gaming terminals.
Our operations are based primarily in Illinois. We have been licensed as a terminal operator in Illinois under the Illinois Gaming Act since 2012. We were one of the first terminal operators licensed in Illinois. The Illinois distributed gaming industry has grown significantly since 2012, with 7,836 licensed establishments operating a total of 41,826 video gaming
terminals (“VGTs”) as of December 31, 2021, according to Scientific Games International’s terminal operator portal and the Video Gaming Revenue Reports published by the IGB. According to the IGB, approximately 1,390 out of approximately 1,496 municipalities in Illinois permit the operation of gaming terminals. Gaming terminals in Illinois can be played in licensed bars, restaurants, gaming cafes, truck stops, fraternal organizations, veterans’ organizations, and other retail establishments, including some convenience stores, in areas accessible only to players who are 21 years of age or older. Gaming revenue in Illinois from gaming terminals generates significant tax revenue. The Illinois state legislature has increased applicable marginal tax rates on gaming from 30% to 33% effective July 1, 2019 and from 33% to 34% effective July
1, 2020. While the increase in gaming tax rates negatively impacted the distributed gaming industry, other legislative changes, such as an increase in the number of permitted gaming terminals at a given location, an increase in maximum wager limits and maximum win payouts are driving overall video gaming revenue upward.
The IGB generally oversees gambling and video gaming operations in the state of Illinois. The IGB is authorized to issue licenses to distributed gaming operators and has broad disciplinary authority over Illinois’s distributed gaming industry which includes the power to fine operators and licensed establishments for non-compliance with IGB regulations. As enforcement efforts and incidents of discipline among licensees increase, fine amounts for non-compliance have also increased. While the IGB has licensed a significant number of new video gaming establishments in recent years, it has also experienced an
increase in its application backlog. In addition, Illinois’ governor is empowered to appoint board members to the IGB and select its administrator for the IGB to ultimately approve. Not only do new appointments have the potential to change the composition of the IGB, they can impact current rules, regulations, policies and agendas of the IGB, which may result in increased enforcement measures or further delays in licensing new establishments. The IGB dictates the maximum bet, maximum win, and approves payout percentages for games played on gaming terminals which are required by regulation to exceed 80%. Generally, suppliers have designed gaming terminals to include between approximately 10 and 40 games. In 2021, payout percentages for gaming terminals across Illinois averaged approximately 92%, according to the Video Gaming Revenue Reports published by the IGB. Accel’s payouts range from 88% to 94%, with an average of 92%. Additionally, Illinois legislation has increased
the maximum number of gaming terminals that may be operated at a given licensed establishment from five to six, with certain qualifying truck stop licensed establishments allowed to operate up to ten gaming terminals. This legislation has also increased the maximum wager that may be placed on a gaming terminal from $2.00 to $4.00 and the maximum win from a single play from $500 to $1,199. All gaming terminals are monitored and controlled by the IGB through a central communications system. The IGB established minimum standards that licensed establishment partner contracts must meet, including limiting the length of contracts entered into after February 2, 2018 to a maximum of eight years with no automatic renewals.
We
have made substantial investments in regulatory training and compliance for our staff and licensed establishment partners. Accel has designed and implemented systems and controls that facilitate compliance with applicable regulatory requirements in Illinois and is working on implementing similar systems and controls in Georgia, Iowa, and for the anticipated start of live gaming in Pennsylvania.
The operation of coin-operated amusement machines, or COAMs, in Georgia has been regulated by the GLC since April 2013. Class B COAMs provide skill-based games with winnings paid in points that may be redeemed for noncash merchandise, prizes, toys, gift certificates, or novelties. The most common type of establishment licensees are convenience stores. Licensed establishments are limited to a maximum of nine machines, unless a municipality specifically limits licensed establishments to a maximum of six machines. In addition, any local
governing authority may vote to remove coin operated amusement machines from its jurisdiction upon 60 days’ advance notice. In 2020, we acquired Tom’s Amusement Company, Inc., a Southeastern U.S. amusement operator and Master Licensee (“Tom’s Amusements”) in the state of Georgia. The acquisition of Tom’s Amusements added 11 Georgia COAM Class B locations to the Accel portfolio, as well as a total of 65 Class B COAM terminals. On May 20,
2021, the Company acquired Island Games, Inc. (“Island”), a southern Georgia amusement operator and Master Licensee in
the state of Georgia. The acquisition of Island added 30 COAM Class B locations to the Accel portfolio, including a total of 89 Class B COAM terminals.
On November 18, 2020, we became a licensed Terminal Operator in Pennsylvania under the Pennsylvania Race Horse Development and Gaming Act, although Accel has not yet commenced any gaming operations in Pennsylvania as of December 31, 2021. In November 2017, Pennsylvania’s Governor signed the Pennsylvania Gaming Act. The law authorized, among other forms of gaming, gaming terminals at qualified truck stops. To qualify for gaming, a truck stop must meet requirements that are similar to those in Illinois. Accel has a binding agreement to install gaming terminals with a partner truck stop establishment in Pennsylvania that has received a conditional license from the PA Board. Accel
is also in discussions with other potential partners who have not yet applied for licensure. The Company hopes to commence gaming operations in Pennsylvania in 2022. We believe the current total potential number of qualified trucks stops to host gaming terminals in Pennsylvania is approximately 100-150 truck stop establishments, although municipalities are able to individually opt out from authorizing distributed gaming. These establishments consist of corporate truck stops and individual and corporate convenience stores that meet current regulatory requirements for gaming terminal installation.
On December 30, 2021, one of the Company's consolidated subsidiaries
became a registered distributor in the State of Iowa, which is required to operate amusement concessions in the state. Amusement concessions are regulated by the IDIA under Title III, Chapter 99B of the Iowa Administrative Code. Amusement concessions fall into two broad categories: games of chance and games of skill. Games of chance means a game in which the result is determined by chance. An example of a game of chance is when a player aligns objects or balls in a prescribed pattern in order to win. Certain establishments such as bars, taverns, and restaurants with a Class B or Class C liquor license are permitted to operate up to four electrical or mechanical games of chance. The total number of permitted electrical and mechanical games of chance allowed in Iowa is capped at 6,928 devices. Games of skill means a game in which the result is determined by the player to do a task, such as directing or throwing objects to designated areas or targets, or by shooting a gun
or rifle. The Company operates both games of chance and games of skill as well as other amusement equipment and ATMs in Iowa.
In addition, our marketing and sales efforts are subject to the rules and regulations of the regulatory gaming bodies and municipal laws and regulations in the jurisdictions where we do business, including rules promulgated by the IGB, GLC, the PA Board, IDIA, and local municipalities in Illinois. These rules generally require sales agent registration, include prohibitions related to inducements and restrict certain advertising and promotional activities.
We may also enter states other than Pennsylvania that currently permit or may consider permitting gaming terminals. Indiana, Missouri, North Carolina, Virginia, and Mississippi have proposed legislation permitting gaming
terminals or other forms of gaming in the past. Other states, counties or municipalities facing tax revenue shortfalls or other fiscal pressure may adopt similar measures.
Accel’s Core Strengths
We believe that the following competitive strengths contribute to our industry leading position:
Gaming-as-a-service platform. When compared with traditional gaming businesses such as casinos, Accel believes its platform benefits from the following advantages:
•“business-to-business” model secured by long-term, exclusive contracts that are typically renewed, allowing for predictable, highly recurring revenue streams with low churn;
•operating
a scalable business in fast-growing gaming segments that are primarily served by fragmented, sub-scale providers;
•data reporting solutions and analytics, offering insight and advice to help licensed establishment partners maximize revenues and ultimately grow their businesses;
•state-of-the-art technology-enabled slot machines from leading manufacturers who provide the most captivating titles in slots entertainment;
•comparatively low capital expenses and a comparatively asset-light operating
model, in each case, when compared to casinos, which typically provide significantly higher capital-intensive offerings such as hotel accommodations, restaurants and stage-based entertainment;
•highly localized footprint that provides more access to gaming and convenience for consumers, as compared to regional casinos that market to players who may live up to several hours away and are thus prone to disruption of their feeder markets; and
•strong marketing, legal, compliance, cash management, financial and technical support systems, all of which remain in-house to boost efficiency and enhance the ability to serve as a premier gaming-as-a-service provider.
Strong relationships with licensed establishment partners. Accel has prioritized establishing strong, lasting
relationships with its licensed establishment partners since its inception. Accel dedicates a relationship manager to each of its licensed establishment partners, who, with support from other personnel, oversees every aspect of partner relationship management and retention. Accel prides itself on providing prompt, reliable service and education, all of which helps to increase referral marketing by its partners. Accel’s relationship managers’ efforts to provide value-added services to their licensed establishment partners result in consistent pre-renewals long before contracts expire and are a key element of our competitive differentiation.
Proven track record in executing and integrating acquisitions. Accel continuously evaluates strategic acquisition opportunities. Accel has a successful track record of identifying,
acquiring and integrating competitive operators at favorable terms. Since becoming a licensed terminal operator in 2012, Accel has acquired 15 operator companies, adding approximately 1,000 licensed establishments to our total portfolio of 2,584 licensed establishment partners as of December 31, 2021. Accel believes that its industry reputation, scale, proven track record of driving revenue synergies, and public acquisition currency enhances its ability to acquire other operators or licensed establishments on favorable terms and makes Accel a preferred partner of choice.
Diversified revenue base with limited churn. Accel believes that gaming regulations in Illinois facilitate a low revenue concentration per licensed establishment partner, and that its low-limit slots are more resilient to economic downturn as consumers typically continue to engage in
locally convenient, lower cost forms of entertainment in such circumstances. For the year ended December 31, 2021, Accel’s best-performing licensed establishment accounted for approximately $3.0 million, or less than 1% of gross revenue, its top 20 licensed establishments represented only 5% of gross revenue and Accel’s licensed establishment partners each contributed an average of approximately $0.3 million of gross revenue. Accel’s voluntary contract renewal rate was approximately 99% for the three-year period ended December 31, 2021. While Accel experiences business disruptions each year due to business failures, IGB-imposed shutdowns, or natural disasters affecting licensed establishment partners, many of these sites reopen in subsequent years under new owners, and Accel believes
it is best-positioned to reengage with those establishments as new licensed establishment partners because of its reputation and leading market position. Accel’s gaming terminals are geographically diversified across the state of Illinois, limiting systemic risk due to local weather patterns or regional economic downturns. We believe that Accel’s recent expansion into Georgia and Iowa and future expansion into other states may further help to diversify its portfolio.
Deep industry and vendor relationships. Accel’s leading market position has led to strong relationships within its industry and with equipment suppliers. Accel has successfully integrated multiple other operators and believes this successful roll-up strategy positions it well with potential additional local operators who could benefit from Accel’s gaming-as-a-service platform. In addition, Accel’s industry leadership permits it to seek
and obtain favorable pricing and supply of key gaming machines. Due to its ability to procure machines and parts easily, Accel is able to rotate machines quickly to licensed establishment partners where they are most needed across its operating footprint. This results in longer, more effective usage and greater lifetimes for Accel’s gaming terminals.
Management team. Accel’s management team has many years of experience and industry knowledge. Accel’s President, Chief Executive Officer and co-founder, Andy Rubenstein, has led the Company since its
inception in 2009, and its other officers have approximately 60 years of combined gaming industry experience. Accel believes that its industry-leading management team has a reputation for integrity and compelling customer service.
Company culture and training. Accel believes that it is an employer of choice for talented candidates. Accel’s corporate culture is strong and Accel invests heavily in employees’ success, including devoting significant resources to training and other development programs. Accel also experiences relatively low levels of employee turnover.
Accel’s Growth Opportunities
Accel’s key growth strategies include its plans to:
Maintain competitive advantage in Illinois and increase gaming terminal share. Accel believes that there
is substantial potential for further growth in Illinois. Accel has been successful in the past in signing competitors’ licensed establishments and has identified prospects for engagement after current contracts with other partners expire. In particular, Accel sees opportunities for expansion in key local markets, such as Springfield, Bloomington and Decatur, where its gaming terminal share is below its share in other regions. Accel also strives to further optimize revenues for gaming terminals it currently operates through refined data analysis, marketing and other initiatives. Accel seeks to increase distribution possibilities through corporate partners who operate multiple licensed establishments such as chain stores. Accel believes that these corporate businesses tend to favor larger operators who have substantial compliance infrastructures in addition to leading service capabilities.
While such licensed establishments have been “second movers” in choosing to adopt video gaming, partnering with reputable operators such as Accel could render deployment of gaming terminals more attractive. Accel’s leadership position also creates an opportunity for it to take advantage of legislative changes in Illinois such as an increased number of allowed gaming terminals per establishment, higher bet limits, higher win amounts, and larger jackpots. Additionally, Accel may realize the benefits of potential municipal ordinance changes that would permit its business to operate in new municipalities.
Grow our operations in Georgia and Iowa. The operation of coin-operated amusement machines in Georgia has been regulated by the Georgia Lottery Corporation since April 2013. Games are skill-based with winnings paid in points that may be redeemed for noncash merchandise, prizes, toys, gift certificates,
or novelties. The most common type of establishment licensees are convenience stores. Licensed establishments are limited to a maximum of nine machines, unless a municipality specifically limits licensed establishments to a maximum of six machines. In 2020, we acquired Tom’s Amusements which added 11 Georgia COAM Class B locations to the Accel portfolio, as well as a total of 65 Class B COAM terminals. On May 20, 2021, the Company acquired Island, a southern Georgia amusement operator and Master Licensee in the state of Georgia. The acquisition of Island added 30 Georgia COAM Class B locations to the Accel portfolio, including a total of 89 Class B COAM terminals.
On December 30, 2021, one of the
Company's consolidated subsidiaries became a registered distributor in the State of Iowa, which is required to operate amusement concessions in the state. Amusement concessions are regulated by the IDIA under Title III, Chapter 99B of the Iowa Administrative Code. Amusement concessions fall into two broad categories: games of chance and games of skill. Games of chance means a game in which the result is determined by chance. An example of a game of chance is when a player aligns objects or balls in a prescribed pattern in order to win. Certain establishments such as bars, taverns, and restaurants with a Class B or Class C liquor license are permitted to operate up to four electrical or mechanical games of chance. The total number of permitted electrical and mechanical games of chance allowed in Iowa is capped at 6,928 devices. Games of skill means a game in which the result
is determined by the player to do a task, such as directing or throwing objects to designated areas or targets, or by shooting a gun or rifle. The Company operates both games of chance and games of skill as well as other amusement equipment and ATMs in Iowa.
Expand operations into Pennsylvania. In November 2017, Pennsylvania’s Governor signed the Pennsylvania Gaming Act. The law authorized, among other forms of gaming, gaming terminals at qualified truck stops. Accel estimates that the total potential number
of qualified truck stops to host gaming terminals in Pennsylvania is approximately 100-150 truck stops as of December 31, 2021, although municipalities are able to individually opt out from authorizing distributed gaming. Accel believes this market opportunity is attractive and has obtained a terminal operator license from the PA Board. Accel is also in discussions with other potential location partners who have not yet applied for licensure. Accel believes that Pennsylvania is a natural choice for its expansion outside of Illinois when compared to other states due to industry similarities with Illinois. See “— Accel’s Industry” for more information.
Establish Player Rewards Program to further drive growth. As part of its gaming-as-a-service suite of offerings, Accel has considered offering a Player Rewards Program for players. The anticipated
terms of the program will provide for players to accumulate points each time they use Accel’s products and may provide points that can be redeemed for rewards. Accel believes this program will result in increased brand loyalty from licensed establishment partners by rewarding players for using Accel’s gaming terminals. This opt-in program is expected to allow data analysis with respect to each player, location and machine, which will in turn permit Accel to better assess performance and serve its partners. Although player rewards programs are not specifically prohibited in Illinois, applicable regulations have not been enacted, and the IGB has not approved any player rewards programs for any terminal operator. Accel has not applied to the IGB to establish any such program, but expects to apply in the event of applicable regulation enactment.
Expand operations to other states. Various states and other
jurisdictions have proposed legislation permitting gaming terminals or other forms of gaming in the past. These states include Indiana, Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina and Virginia. Accel may also choose to expand operations through strategic acquisitions or otherwise in other, more mature gaming jurisdictions where gaming terminals are currently legal, such as Louisiana, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, South Dakota and West Virginia. Accel may attempt to seek approval to operate in additional jurisdictions that authorize video gaming. Accel believes it would be a favored entrant into any such markets given its track record of success and compliance.
Expand ancillary service offerings to licensed establishments. While distributing and servicing amusement devices such as jukeboxes, dartboards, pool tables, pinball machines and other ancillary equipment, such as redemption devices and stand-alone ATMs,
is not the primary focus of its business, Accel believes that these services provide a key point for ongoing customer contact and enhances its image as a “one-stop shop” for entertainment devices. Accel has observed that licensed establishment partners appreciate these services and continue to rely on Accel to provide them. Providing these services can also serve as a point of initial contact with potential partners who may decide to avail themselves later of Accel’s primary gaming services. As a result, Accel intends to continue prioritizing the installation of these devices and equipment.
Business Model and Capabilities
Accel provides a full suite of services and capabilities to enhance its business. These include:
Sales team that drives the initial acquisition of licensed establishment partners. Accel
has a dedicated internal sales team that drives sourcing of new licensed establishment partners. Accel also uses external independent sales agents. When seeking to sign a new licensed establishment partner, Accel’s marketing team employs a data-driven sales process to identify and nurture leads using a variety of digital and traditional strategies to drive organic gaming partnerships and preference. Accel’s marketing team uses email, social media, blogs, search engine optimization, paid search and display advertising to create a robust pipeline of leads. Sales teams are incentivized based on a competitive commission-based structure, which has driven performance. Accel believes that it can continue to attract talented sales employees.
Dedicated on-boarding process that works with new licensed establishments to provide quick access to gaming terminals and other equipment. Accel engages with licensed establishment
partners through every step of the gaming terminal installation process. This process begins with providing assistance with preparation and submission of a license application to the applicable gaming regulatory board and educating each licensed establishment partner on legal and regulatory topics to minimize compliance issues. Accel assists in the design and construction of gaming areas in licensed establishments, including advising with respect to Illinois Video Gaming Act requirements that restrict access to persons
under 21 years of age. Accel then delivers gaming terminals to the licensed establishment partner after receipt of the proper state and
municipal licenses, which typically takes between two and six months from submission to receipt of approval to operate gaming terminals.
Relationship management team that offers value to licensed establishment partners. Each of Accel’s licensed establishment partners has a dedicated relationship manager who works with the licensed establishment partner in maximizing revenue, based upon the licensed establishment’s unique characteristics. Compliance support is offered to assist the licensed establishment partner with understanding gaming regulations, optimizing services that analyze video gaming data against established benchmarks to assess and improve performance, offering marketing advice ranging from traditional advertising and signage to social media advice, providing industry tracking and reporting measured against Accel’s industry data, and delivering ongoing training for licensed establishment
partner staff.
Digital and data analytics team that helps licensed establishment partners capture gaming revenue. Accel’s digital and data analytics team studies the gaming terminal market and licensed establishment partner performance to provide insight and advice to maximize gaming revenue. The team actively monitors machine optimization, service analytics, video game popularity analytics, marketing and player behavior to identify new opportunities and provide insights to maximize gaming revenues. Typical suggestions might involve adding new games, switching machines, adding machines or changing machine location within a licensed establishment. The digital and data analytics team also seeks to improve the quality of customer service and satisfaction by monitoring service calls to identify trends and solutions with the goal of optimizing response time to decrease periods of machine inoperability.
Dedicated
legal and compliance function that assists licensed establishment partners to remain in regulatory compliance. Accel’s legal and compliance team provides support and resources related to licensed establishment regulatory compliance, which includes sending compliance reminders and industry updates to licensed establishment partners on a regular basis. It does not dispense legal advice to licensed establishment partners, but may recommend that licensed establishment partners obtain legal counsel in certain instances. In addition, the legal and compliance team participates in lobbying measures, which includes working with gaming regulators and trade associations to encourage legislation and regulation which may be favorable to the distributed gaming industry. Accel also regularly works with regulators in other states as they explore the legalization of gaming terminals.
Strong relationships with equipment
manufacturers to provide top-flight machines and software that help attract players. Accel partners and has entered into purchase agreements with many industry-leading manufacturers of gaming terminals. Accel benefits from favorable pricing and other terms with respect to its supplier partners. Accel believes that by providing world-class premium equipment, it can assist licensed establishment partners in securing competitive advantages. By using high-quality equipment, Accel aims to limit downtime and help maximize revenue and player retention.
Cash collection and analytics. Accel offers cash collection and analytics services at multiple strategic locations across Illinois to help ensure secure, fast and accurate collection of revenue for licensed establishment partners. Additionally, Accel’s data team provides information to its treasury department enabling it to deliver efficient,
secure, and optimized collection services. These cash collection locations function as a key point of contact for licensed establishment partners, and Accel believes that this service differentiates it from most of its competitors.
Marketing services that aid in player awareness and gameplay. In addition to its business-to-business focus, Accel’s marketing team uses a variety of player marketing strategies to drive player preference, loyalty, and increase play at Accel locations. Player marketing initiatives include a dedicated player website, AEPlayer.com, a statewide player loyalty program (AEPlayer Rewards), including a tablet-based in-location entry option as well as a mobile app, player email and text messaging communications, indoor and outdoor signage, cooperative location advertising
and other media to increase awareness and encourage gameplay. Accel believes that these initiatives increase Accel’s branding at each location. Accel believes that it has the most extensive and accomplished marketing team in the Illinois gaming terminal segment.
Best-in-class technicians who assist licensed establishment partners in the event of any mechanical or software issues with the devices Accel provides. Accel leverages technology and data-driven algorithms to enable a 24/7 call center to direct its service technicians. These technicians serve to prevent and solve technical issues with
gaming terminals at licensed establishment partners in a timely manner. Accel’s service tracking process begins when a licensed establishment partner identifies an issue at their licensed establishment and contacts the service center. As of December 31, 2021, more than 15% of service issues are resolved by the call center directly without the need to dispatch any technician. In the event a technician is required, 96% of customer service issues are addressed on a first-time technician dispatch, with an average response time of approximately 80 minutes. Replacement parts for gaming terminals, if required, are sourced from Accel’s offices and warehouses located across the state. Accel uses system analytics across its gaming-as-a-service platform to keep track of parts used and, if necessary, order new parts for delivery to various warehouses.
Sports betting.
Accel believes it is well positioned to participate in the fast-growing sports betting segment. While Accel expects to remain focused on gaming in the near future, it has not applied for a sports betting license, but it may consider doing so in the future.
Licensed Establishments and VGTs
As of December 31, 2021, Accel operates 13,639 VGTs in 2,584 licensed establishments in the state of Illinois. Licensed establishments typically include bars, restaurants, gaming cafes, truck stops, fraternal organizations, veterans’ organizations, and other retail establishments.
Accel enters into long-term exclusive location and gaming terminal use agreements with its licensed establishment partners, or master exclusive gaming terminal use agreements with licensed establishment partners who have several
licensed establishments. Under those agreements, Accel has the exclusive right to place gaming terminals and redemption devices in such licensed establishments. Once proper licenses are received, Accel experiences minimal delay related to the installation of gaming terminals in those licensed establishments. As of December 31, 2021, the average remaining term on Accel’s agreements is 6.8 years. In addition, Accel’s voluntary contract renewal rate for the three-year period ended December 31, 2021 was approximately 99%.
Under these agreements, Accel is responsible for providing hardware and related software, accounting and reporting functions as required by the Illinois Video Gaming Act and/or Pennsylvania Gaming Act, and placement of devices
such as stand-alone ATMs and redemption devices at the discretion of the licensed establishment.
Under IGB regulations, tax and administrative fees in Illinois are required to be split evenly between gaming terminal operators and licensed establishments. Accordingly, Accel shares the responsibility with its licensed establishment partners of the payment of a 34% tax on gross gaming revenue, with such tax increased from 33% beginning on July 1, 2020. In accordance with IGB regulations, Accel further shares the responsibility of a 0.8513% administrative fee with its licensed establishment partners, payable to Scientific Games International, the company that maintains the central communications system to which all gaming terminals across Illinois are connected. The remaining after-tax profits
from a video gaming terminal, 50% shall be paid to Accel and 50% shall be paid to the licensed establishment in accordance with Illinois state law. Accel typically remits the amount to licensed establishment partners on a weekly basis. Accel’s agreements with licensed establishment partners are typically not subject to termination rights by licensed establishment partners in the event of a sale or relocation of the licensed establishments during the term of the agreements, though termination may occur upon closure of the business or if the licensed establishment partner chooses to terminate at the end of a term.
In addition, Accel has a very limited number of revenue-share agreements with other licensed terminal operators in Illinois, which provide splitting gross gaming revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2021, revenue shared with other terminal operators accounted for
less than 1% of gross revenue.
Accel installs cutting-edge software and multi-game gaming terminals, at each licensed establishment, from leading manufacturers such as Scientific Games International, WMS (owned by Scientific Games International), IGT, Bally (owned by Scientific Games International), Aristocrat and Novomatic. Under agreements with these manufacturers, Accel is able to provide 28 different types of gaming terminal models and 242 different games to licensed establishment partners. Accel believes its efforts to procure gaming terminals from various
sources better enables it to meet the needs of licensed establishment partners and players.
Accel purchases gaming terminals in upright and slant varieties. Games include different varieties of slots, poker, and keno games. Accel routinely meets with existing and potential manufacturers in the market to discuss performance, service trends, and feedback from licensed establishment partners and players. Accel purchases gaming terminals from certain suppliers under master purchase agreements and purchase orders. Under these master purchase agreements with certain suppliers, pricing is determined by purchase commitments made for delivery over defined periods. Accel generally pays its suppliers within 90 days after the date of invoice.
Accel also purchases redemption devices, amusement devices and stand-alone ATMs from reputable suppliers such as NRT, Touch Tunes, Arachnid, and Diamond.
Competition
Accel
competes on the basis of the responsiveness of its services to players, and the popularity, content, features, quality, functionality, accuracy and reliability of its products. Accel generally does not consider pricing to be a factor in its gaming terminal business as all minimum and maximum wagers are mandated by the IGB and all revenue splits with the licensed establishments are mandated by the IGB and by law. Accel believes most licensed establishments focus on player appeal, customer service and reputation when making their decisions to collaborate with terminal operators. In Illinois, Accel currently competes with 55 terminal operators that operate in 7,836 gaming establishments as of December 31, 2021. The top five terminal operators with which Accel principally competes are J&J Ventures Gaming, LLC, Gold Rush Amusements, Inc., Illinois Gaming Investors LLC, Gaming & Entertainment Management-Illinois LLC,
and Midwest Electronics Gaming, LLC. Together with Accel, they operate in more than 82% of all licensed establishments in Illinois, and the top 10 terminal operators in Illinois operate in approximately 91% of all licensed establishments. Accel currently operates gaming terminals and/or amusement devices in 32% of all establishments licensed to operate gaming terminals in Illinois.
Accel faces particularly robust competition from other forms of gaming. The distributed gaming industry is characterized by an increasingly high degree of competition among a large number of participants on both a local and national level, including casinos, Internet gaming, sports betting, sweepstakes and poker machines not located in casinos, horse racetracks (including those featuring slot machines and/or table games), fantasy sports, real money iGaming, and other forms of gaming. In addition, Internet-based lotteries, sweepstakes, and fantasy
sports, and Internet-based or mobile-based gaming platforms, which allow their customers to wager on a wide variety of sporting events and/or play casino games from home or in non-casino settings and could divert players from using Accel’s products in its licensed establishments. Even Internet wagering services that may be illegal under federal and state law but operate from overseas locations, may nevertheless sometimes be accessible to domestic gamblers and divert players from visiting licensed establishment partners to play on Accel’s gaming terminals.
The availability of other forms of gaming could increase substantially in the future. Voters and state legislatures may seek to supplement traditional sources of tax revenue by authorizing or expanding gaming. For example, on June 2, 2019, the Illinois legislature passed a significant gaming expansion bill authorizing the
addition of more casinos to the state, including a casino in Chicago, permitting slot and table games at three horse racetracks, adding slot machines to two Illinois airports, and sports betting at a variety of approved establishments throughout the state. In addition, jurisdictions are considering or have already recently legalized, implemented and expanded gaming, and there are proposals across the country that would legalize Internet poker and other varieties of Internet gaming in a number of states and at the federal level. Pennsylvania enacted legislation allowing regulated online poker and casino-style games within the commonwealth and legalizing sports betting in casinos. Established gaming jurisdictions could also award additional gaming licenses or permit the expansion or relocation of existing gaming
operations, including gaming terminals. While Accel believes it is well positioned to take advantage of certain of these opportunities, expansion of gaming in other jurisdictions, both legal and illegal, could further compete with its gaming terminals.
In addition to competition from other forms of gaming and entertainment and the expansion thereof, Accel’s business faces significant competition from suppliers and other terminal operators, stand-alone ATMs, jukeboxes, dartboards, pool tables, pinball machines and related entertainment machines. Accel’s operations also face competition from many forms of leisure and entertainment activities, including shopping, athletic events, television and movies, concerts, and travel.
Intellectual property
Accel owns or has rights to
use the trademarks, service marks or trade names that it uses or will use in conjunction with the operation of its business. In the highly competitive gaming industry, trademarks, service marks, trade names and logos are important to the success of its business.
As of December 31, 2021, Accel owned 12 registered trademarks and 103 registered domain names. Accel also relies on software or technologies that it licenses from third parties. These licenses may not continue to be available to Accel on commercially reasonable terms in the future and as a result, Accel may be required to obtain substitute software or technologies.
Seasonality
Accel’s results of operations can fluctuate due to seasonal trends and other factors. For example, the gross revenue per machine per day is typically lower
in the summer when players will typically spend less time indoors at licensed establishments, and higher in cold weather between February and April, when players will typically spend more time indoors. Holidays, vacation seasons and sporting events may also cause Accel’s results to fluctuate.
Employees
As of December 31, 2021, Accel had approximately 900 employees. None of Accel’s employees are represented by a labor union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Accel believes its current staffing levels to be adequate for its needs and operations, and that relations with employees are generally good.
The board of directors is charged with oversight of human capital management. Accel's human capital resources objectives include, as applicable, identifying, recruiting, retaining,
incentivizing and integrating our existing and additional employees. The principal purposes of our equity incentive plans are to attract, retain and motivate selected employees, consultants and directors through the granting of stock-based compensation awards and cash-based performance bonus awards. The Accel Code of Business Conduct and Ethics sets high standards of ethical business conduct and provides guidance applicable to every employee, including every Accel officer and director. The Accel Code of Business Conduct and Ethics covers many types of matters, including creating a respectful work environment that is free of unlawful discrimination and harassment.
Available Information
Our principal executive offices are located at 140 Tower Drive, Burr Ridge, Illinois60527, and our telephone number is (630) 972-2235. Our website is www.accelentertainment.com. The information contained on our website or that can be accessed through our website is not part of, and is not incorporated by reference
into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in any other report or document we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
We file reports with the SEC, including Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any other filings required by the SEC. Through our website, we make available free of charge our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.
The SEC maintains an Internet site (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other
information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
You should carefully consider the risk factors set forth below as well as the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes. Any of the following risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. The risks described below are not the only risks facing us.
Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or those we currently view to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Summary of Risk Factors
Below is a summary of the principal factors that make an investment in our common stock speculative or risky. This summary does not address all of the risks that we face. Additional discussion of the risks summarized in this risk factor summary, and other risks that we face, can be found below under the heading “Risk Factors” and should be carefully considered, together with other information in this Form 10-K and our other filings with the SEC, before making an investment decision regarding our common stock
•The continued effect of the COVID-19 pandemic is uncertain and cannot be
predicted. The COVID-19 pandemic could worsen, or its effects may be prolonged, which could lead to a materially adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
•Our operating results are likely to vary significantly and be unpredictable.
•Our success depends on its ability to offer new and innovative products and services that fulfill the needs of licensed establishment partners and create strong and sustained player appeal.
•We are dependent on relationships with key manufacturers, developers and third parties to obtain gaming terminals, amusement machines, and related supplies, programs, and technologies for our business on acceptable terms.
•Our future results of operations may be
negatively impacted by slow growth in demand for gaming terminals and by the slow growth of new gaming jurisdictions.
•We depend heavily on our ability to win, maintain and renew contracts with licensed establishment partners.
•Adverse economic conditions or decreased discretionary spending may adversely impact our business.
•Our ability to operate in existing markets or expand into new jurisdictions could be adversely affected by difficulties, delays, or failures by us or our stakeholders in obtaining or maintaining required licenses or approvals.
•Our business is geographically concentrated, which subjects
it to greater risks from changes in local or regional conditions. Our revenue growth and future success depends on our ability to expand into new markets, which may not occur as anticipated or at all.
•Our industry is highly competitive and we must accurately predict, prepare for and respond promptly to technological and market developments and changing end-customer needs, including by acquiring and integrating other businesses, products and technologies that address a fast-changing technology and threat landscape and that achieve sufficient market acceptance, in order to maintain or improve our competitive position.
•We are subject to strict government regulations that are constantly evolving and may be amended, repealed, or subject to new interpretations, which may limit existing operations, have an adverse impact on the ability
to grow or may expose us to fines or other penalties.
•We have identified three material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and if remediation of these material weaknesses is not effective, or if we fail to develop and maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable laws and regulations could be impaired and our reputation and business could be adversely affected. In
addition, the presence of material weaknesses increases
the risk of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements.
•Our business depends on the protection of intellectual property and proprietary information.
•Gaming opponents persist in their efforts to curtail the expansion of legalized gaming, which, if successful, could limit our growth of operations.
•Our success depends on the security and integrity of the systems and products offered, and security breaches or other disruptions could compromise certain information and expose us to liability.
•Our level of indebtedness and its related variable interest rate, and any increase thereto, could adversely affect results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
•Certain
stockholders own a significant portion of common stock and they may have interests that differ from those of other stockholders.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
The continued outbreak and spread of the novel coronavirus disease known as COVID-19, and its related variants, has had, and could continue to have, an adverse impact on our business, operations and financial condition for an extended period of time.
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the novel coronavirus disease (“COVID-19”) a global pandemic and recommended containment and mitigation measures worldwide. Since its initial outbreak, the spread of COVID-19 and its variants, and the measures taken in response to the pandemic, have had a global and national impact, both direct and indirect,
on businesses and commerce. Despite recent progress in the administration of vaccines, the future impact of the pandemic on global and local economies will continue to depend on future developments such as the emergence of future variant strains of COVID-19, the availability and distribution of effective medical treatments and vaccines, vaccination rates, as well as government-imposed restrictions or mandates. As a result, the length of the pandemic and its ultimate economic and human toll cannot yet be determined
The mandated shutdowns of our licensed establishment partners’ gaming operations and our VGTs by the IGB from March 16, 2020 to July 1, 2020 and from November 19, 2020 to January 16, 2021 substantially and adversely
impacted our business, operations and financial condition. In addition, we have been, and will continue to be further, negatively impacted by related developments in response to resurgences of COVID-19 and its variants, including heightened governmental regulations and travel advisories, recommendations by the U.S. Department of State and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and travel bans and restrictions, each of which has significantly impacted, and could continue to impact, travel of customers to our licensed establishment partners.
While the IGB announced the resumption of all video gaming activities in January 2021, it is possible that it or the State of Illinois may order a shutdown by region (currently 11 regions), or a complete suspension of video gaming in the state, or institute stay-at-home, closure or other similar orders or measures in the future in response to a resurgence of COVID-19 or other events.
We may be adversely impacted as a result of any future adverse impact of COVID-19 on our licensed establishment partners.
Further, our business may be negatively impacted by the adverse changes in the perceived or actual economic climate, including higher unemployment rates, declines in income levels and loss of personal wealth resulting from the impact of COVID-19 and its related variants, which could contribute to weak demand for gaming and non-gaming services.
Additionally, given the existing impact of COVID-19 on our business, operations and financial condition and potential future impact, we can make no assurances that we will be able to successfully pursue expansion of gaming operations into new jurisdictions or that such jurisdictions will pass laws and regulations allowing gaming, the opening of new licensed
establishments, the addition of new gaming terminals and amusement machines in existing licensed establishments or the acquisition of other terminal operators.
There may be other adverse consequences to our business, operations and financial condition from the spread of COVID-19 that we have not considered. Prior to March 2020, we had not previously experienced a complete cessation of our business operations, and as a consequence, our ability to predict the impact of any future cessation on our business and future prospects is limited. We can offer no assurances that the effects of COVID-19 are temporary or that any losses that are incurred as a result of these uncertainties will be regained if and when this crisis has passed. As a result, COVID-19 may continue to have a material adverse impact on our business, operations and financial condition for an extended
period of time.
Accel’s ability to operate in existing markets or expand into new jurisdictions could be adversely affected by difficulties, delays, or failures by Accel or its stakeholders in obtaining or maintaining required licenses or approvals.
Accel operates only in jurisdictions where gaming is legal. The gaming industry is subject to extensive governmental regulation by federal, state, and local governments, which customarily includes some form of licensing or regulatory screening of operators, suppliers, manufacturers and distributors and their applicable affiliates, their major stockholders, officers, directors and key employees. In addition, certain gaming products and technologies must be certified or approved in certain jurisdictions in which Accel operates, and these regulatory requirements vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. The scope of the approvals required
can be extensive. Regulators review many facets of an applicant or holder of a license, including its financial stability, integrity and business experience. While the regulatory requirements vary by jurisdiction, most require:
•licenses and/or permits;
•documentation of qualifications, including evidence of financial stability;
•other required approvals for companies who design, assemble, supply or distribute gaming equipment and services; and
•individual suitability of officers, directors, major equity holders, lenders, key employees and business partners.
Accel may not be able to obtain or maintain all necessary registrations, licenses, permits or
approvals, or could experience delays related to the licensing process which could adversely affect its operations and ability to retain key employees. If Accel fails to obtain a license required in a particular jurisdiction for games and gaming terminals, hardware or software or have such license revoked, it will not be able to expand into, or continue doing business in, such jurisdiction. Any delay, difficulty or failure by Accel to obtain or retain a required license or approval in one jurisdiction could negatively impact the ability to obtain or retain required licenses and approvals in other jurisdictions, or affect eligibility for a license in other jurisdictions, which can negatively affect opportunities for growth. For example, if Accel’s license to operate in Illinois is not renewed as a result of a failure to satisfy suitability requirements or otherwise, its ability to obtain or maintain a license in Pennsylvania or Georgia may be harmed. Unexpected changes
or concessions required by local, state or federal regulatory authorities could involve significant additional costs and delay. The necessary permits, licenses and approvals may not be obtained within the anticipated time frames, or at all. Additionally, licenses, approvals or findings of suitability may be revoked, suspended or conditioned at any time. If a license, approval or finding of suitability is required by a regulatory authority and Accel fails to seek or does not receive the necessary approval, license or finding of suitability, or if it is granted and subsequently revoked, it could have an adverse effect on Accel’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
For example, Accel has received a terminal operator license from the PA Board. While Accel does not expect that the composition of the PA Board will change prior to the next Pennsylvania gubernatorial election in 2022, there can be no assurances
with respect thereto, and any changes in composition to the PA Board could alter existing interpretations or enforcement of the Pennsylvania Gaming Act. In Illinois, Accel was granted its original license to conduct business as a terminal operator by the IGB in 2012, and has most recently had its license renewed in June 2020, retroactive to March 2020 for a period of one year. Renewal is subject to, among other things, continued satisfaction of suitability requirements.
In addition to any licensing requirements, all of Accel’s licensed establishment partners are required to be licensed, and delays in or failure
to obtain approvals of these licenses may adversely affect results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Accel and certain of its affiliates, major stockholders (generally persons and entities beneficially owning a specified percentage (typically 5% or more) of equity securities), directors, officers and key employees are subject to extensive background investigations, personal and financial disclosure obligations and suitability standards in its businesses. Certain jurisdictions may require the same from Accel’s lenders or key business partners. The failure of these individuals and business entities to submit to such background checks and provide required disclosure, or delayed review or denial of application resulting from such submissions, could jeopardize Accel’s ability to obtain or maintain licensure in such jurisdictions. Any delay, difficulty, or failure by any of Accel’s major stockholders, directors, officers, key employees, products or technology,
to obtain or retain a required license or approval in one jurisdiction could negatively impact its licensure in other jurisdictions, which can ultimately negatively affect opportunities for growth. In addition, the failure of Accel’s officers, directors, key employees or business partners, equity holders, or lenders to obtain or maintain licenses in one or more jurisdictions may require Accel to modify or terminate its relationship with such officers, directors, key employees or business partners, equity holders, or lenders, or forego doing business in such jurisdiction. The licensing procedures and background investigations of the authorities that regulate Accel’s businesses may inhibit potential investors from becoming significant stockholders, inhibit existing stockholders from retaining or increasing their ownership, or inhibit existing stockholders from selling their shares to potential investors who are found unsuitable to hold Accel stock by gaming authorities
or whose stock ownership may adversely affect Accel’s ability to obtain, maintain, renew or qualify for a license, contract, franchise or other regulatory approval from a gaming authority.
If Accel fails to manage its growth effectively, Accel may be unable to execute its business plan or maintain high levels of service and customer satisfaction.
Accel has experienced, and expects to continue to experience, rapid growth, which has placed, and may continue to place, significant demands on its management and its operational and financial resources. Since its inception, Accel has acquired 13 distributed gaming operators adding approximately 1,000 licensed establishments to its portfolio of 2,584 total licensed establishments as of December 31,
2021. Accel has also experienced significant growth in the number of licensed establishment partners and players, and in the amount of data that it supports. Additionally, Accel’s organizational structure will become more complex as it scales its operational, financial and management controls to support additional jurisdictions as well as its reporting systems and procedures.
To manage growth in operations and personnel, Accel will need to continue to grow and improve its operational, financial, and management controls and reporting systems and procedures. Accel may require significant capital expenditures and the allocation of valuable management resources to grow and change in these areas without undermining its culture, which has been central to growth so far. Accel’s expansion has placed, and expected future growth will continue to place, a significant strain on management, customer experience, data analytics, sales
and marketing, administrative, financial, and other resources. If Accel fails to manage its anticipated growth and change in a manner consistent with its reputation, the quality of its services may suffer, which could negatively affect its brand and reputation and harm its ability to attract licensed establishment partners and players.
Accel’s success depends on its ability to offer new and innovative products and services that fulfill the needs of licensed establishment partners and create strong and sustained player appeal.
Accel’s success depends upon its ability to fulfill the needs of licensed establishment partners and players by offering new and innovative products and services on a timely basis. Consumer preferences for games are usually cyclical and difficult to predict, and even the most successful content remains popular for only limited periods of time, unless refreshed
with new content or otherwise enhanced. If Accel fails to accurately anticipate the needs of licensed establishments and player preferences, it could lose business to competitors, which would adversely affect Accel’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Accel may not have the financial resources needed to introduce new products or services on a timely basis or at all.
Accel’s business depends on content for gaming terminals, stand-alone ATMs, redemption devices, and amusement devices that is developed by third-party suppliers. Accel believes that creative and appealing game content results in more players
visiting
its licensed establishment partners, which offers more revenue for licensed establishment partners and provides them with a competitive advantage, which in turn enhances Accel’s revenue and ability to attract new business and to retain existing business. The success of such content is dependent on these suppliers’ ability to anticipate changes in consumer tastes, preferences and requirements and deliver to Accel in sufficient quantities and on a timely basis a desirable, high-quality and price-competitive mix of products. Accel’s suppliers’ products may fail to meet the needs of licensed establishment partners due to changes in consumer preference or Accel’s suppliers may be unable to maintain a sufficient inventory to satisfy the requirements of licensed establishment partners. In addition, suppliers must obtain regulatory approvals for new products, and such approvals may be delayed or denied. Accordingly, Accel may not be able to sustain the success of its existing
game content or effectively obtain from third parties their products and services that will be widely accepted both by licensed establishment partners and players.
Accel’s suppliers may also increase their prices due to increasing demand for their products from Accel’s competitors. Further, because there exists a limited number of suppliers in the distributed gaming business, an increase in supplier pricing may limit Accel’s ability to seek alternate sources of gaming content and may result in increased operating expenses. See “Risk Factors — Accel is dependent on relationships with key manufacturers, developers and third parties to obtain gaming terminals, amusement machines, and related supplies, programs, and technologies for its business on acceptable terms” for more information.
Accel is dependent on relationships with key manufacturers,
developers and third parties to obtain gaming terminals, amusement machines, and related supplies, programs, and technologies for its business on acceptable terms.
The supply of Accel’s gaming terminals, stand-alone ATMs, redemption devices and amusement devices depend upon the manufacture, development, assembly, design, maintenance and repair of such products by certain key providers, as well as regulatory approval for these products. Accel’s operating results could be adversely affected by an interruption or cessation in the supply of these items, a serious quality assurance lapse, including as a result of the insolvency of any key provider, or regulatory issues related to key providers’ products or required licenses. Additionally, certain components of our gaming terminals are sourced from China, where the initial outbreaks of the COVID-19 occurred
and where other widespread public health problems have led to quarantines, shutdowns, shipping or logistics changes, or other disruptions that could impair our ability to obtain gaming terminals and their components. Accel has achieved significant cost savings through centralized purchasing of equipment and non-equipment. However, as a result, Accel is exposed to the credit and other risks of having a small number of key suppliers. While Accel makes every effort to evaluate counterparties prior to entering into long-term and other significant procurement contracts, it cannot predict the impact on suppliers of the current economic environment and other developments in their respective businesses. Insolvency, financial difficulties, supply chain delays, regulatory issues or other factors may result in Accel’s
suppliers not being able to fulfill the terms of their agreements. Further, such factors may render suppliers unwilling to extend contracts that provide favorable terms to Accel or may force them to seek to renegotiate existing contracts.
Failure of key suppliers to meet their delivery commitments could result in Accel being in breach of and subsequently losing contracts with key licensed establishment partners. Although Accel believes it has alternative sources of supply for the equipment and other supplies used in its business, the limited number of suppliers in the distributed gaming business could lead to delays in the delivery of products or components,
and possible resultant breaches of contracts that it is party to with licensed establishment partners, increases in the prices it must pay for products or components, problems with product quality or components coming to the end of their life and other concerns. Accel may be unable to find adequate replacements for suppliers within a reasonable time frame, on favorable commercial terms or at all.
Certain of Accel’s products and services, including a Player Rewards Program that Accel intends to implement, include know-your-customer programs or technologies supplied by third parties. These programs and technologies could be an important aspect of products and services because they can confirm certain information with respect to players and prospective players, such as age, identity and location. Payment processing programs and technologies,
typically provided by third parties, are also a necessary feature of Accel’s products and services. In the event that these products and technologies are not made available to
Accel on acceptable terms, or in the event that they are defective, Accel’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
Accel’s future results of operations may be negatively impacted by slow growth in demand for gaming terminals and by the slow growth of new gaming jurisdictions.
Slow growth or declines in the demand for gaming terminals
could reduce the demand for Accel’s services and negatively impact results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Moreover, even with the expansion of gaming into new jurisdictions, the opening of new licensed establishments and the addition of new gaming terminals and amusement machines in existing licensed establishments, demand for Accel’s services could decline due to the desires of licensed establishment partners, unfavorable economic conditions, failure to obtain regulatory approvals and the availability of financing. Accordingly, Accel may not be successful in placing additional gaming terminals or amusement machines with additional licensed establishments.
Accel depends heavily on its ability to win, maintain and renew contracts with licensed establishment partners, and it could lose substantial revenue if it is
unable to renew certain of its contracts on substantially similar terms or at all.
Accel’s contracts with its licensed establishment partners generally contain initial multi-year terms. Contracts entered into prior to February 2018 typically contain automatic renewal provisions that provide the individual partner with an option to terminate within a specified time frame. As a result of the IGB rule changes, contracts entered into after February 2018 do not contain renewal provisions, automatic or otherwise. At the end of a contract
term, licensed establishment partners may choose to extend their engagement by signing a new contract or may sign with a competitor terminal operator, in their sole discretion.
While Accel has historically experienced high rates of contract extension or renewal, these rule changes may lead to declines in contract extension or renewal. The termination, expiration or failure to renew one or more of its contracts with its licensed establishment partners could cause it to lose substantial revenue, which could have an adverse effect on its ability to win or renew other
contracts or pursue growth initiatives.
In addition, Accel may not be able to obtain new or renewed contracts with licensed establishment partners that contain terms that are as favorable as Accel’s current terms in its current contracts, and any less favorable contract terms or diminution in scope could negatively impact Accel’s business.
Additionally, Accel’s revenue, business, result of operations, cash flows and financial condition could be negatively affected if its licensed establishment partners sell or merge themselves
or their licensed establishments with other entities. Upon the sale or merger of such licensed establishments, Accel’s licensed establishment partners could choose to no longer partner with Accel and decide to contract with its competitors.
Unfavorable economic conditions or decreased discretionary spending due to other factors such as terrorist activity or threat thereof, epidemics, pandemics or other public health issues, civil unrest or other economic or political uncertainties, may adversely affect Accel’s business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Unfavorable economic conditions, including recession, economic slowdown, decreased liquidity in the financial markets, decreased availability of credit and relatively high rates of unemployment or inflation, could
have a negative effect on Accel’s business. Unfavorable economic conditions could cause licensed establishment partners to shut down or ultimately declare bankruptcy, which could adversely affect Accel’s business. Unfavorable economic conditions may also result in volatility in the credit and equity markets. The difficulty or inability of licensed establishment partners to generate or obtain adequate levels of capital to finance their ongoing operations may cause some to close or ultimately declare bankruptcy. Accel cannot fully predict the effects that unfavorable social, political and economic conditions and economic uncertainties and decreased discretionary spending could have on its business.
Accel’s revenue is largely driven by players’ disposable incomes and level of gaming activity. Unfavorable economic conditions may reduce the disposable incomes of players at licensed establishment partners and may result in fewer
players visiting licensed establishment partners, reduced play levels, and lower amounts spent per visit, adversely affecting Accel’s results of operations and cash flows. Adverse changes in discretionary consumer spending or consumer preferences, which may
result in fewer players visiting licensed establishment partners and reduced frequency of visits and play levels, could also be driven by an unstable job market, outbreaks (or fear of outbreaks) of contagious diseases, such as the COVID-19 outbreak and its variants, inflation or other factors. Socio-political factors such as terrorist activity or threat
thereof, civil unrest or other economic or political uncertainties that contribute to consumer unease may also result in decreased discretionary spending by players and have a negative effect on Accel.
Accel’s revenue growth and future success depends on its ability to expand into new markets, which may not occur as anticipated or at all.
Accel’s future success and growth depend in large part on the successful addition of new licensed establishments as partners (whether through organic growth, conversion from competitors or partner relationships) and on the entry into new markets, including other licensed jurisdictions such as Pennsylvania, where Accel was granted a license as a terminal operator in November 2020 but has not commenced gaming operations as of December 31, 2021; Georgia, where Accel acquired Tom’s Amusement Company,
Inc., a Southeastern U.S. amusement operator and Master Licensee, in July 2020, and Island Games, Inc., a southern Georgia amusement operator in May 2021; and Iowa, where Accel recently acquired the amusement and ATM assets of the affiliated companies, Rich and Junnie's Inc. and JBCJ, Inc. These markets are newer to Accel and its success depends in part on displacing entrenched competitors who are familiar with these markets and are known to players. In many cases, Accel is attempting to enter into or expand its presence in these newer markets and where the appeal and success of gaming terminals and other forms of entertainment has not yet been proven. In some cases, Accel may need to develop or expand its sales channels and leverage the relationships with its licensed establishment partners in order to execute this strategy. There can be no assurance that video gaming will have success with new licensed establishment partners
or in new markets, or that it will succeed in capturing a significant or even acceptable market share in any new markets, including Pennsylvania, Georgia and Iowa. In addition, it is possible that Accel will not be able to commence operations in the Pennsylvania market due to regulatory or other concerns. See “Accel is subject to strict government regulations that are constantly evolving and may be amended, repealed, or subject to new interpretations, which may limit existing operations, have an adverse impact on the ability to grow or may expose Accel to fines or other penalties.” If Accel fails to successfully expand into these markets, it may have difficulty growing its business and may lose business to its competitors.
Accel’s business is geographically concentrated, which subjects it to greater risks from changes in local or regional conditions.
Accel
currently installs gaming terminals and amusement devices in licensed establishments primarily in Illinois. Due to this geographic concentration, Accel’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition are subject to greater risks from changes in local and regional conditions, such as:
•changes in local or regional economic conditions and unemployment rates;
•changes in local and state laws and regulations, including gaming laws and regulations;
•a decline in the number of residents in or near, or visitors to, licensed establishment partners;
•changes in the local or regional competitive environment; and
•adverse
weather conditions and natural disasters (including weather or road conditions that limit access to licensed establishments).
Accel largely depends on local markets of licensed establishments for players. Local competitive risks and the failure of licensed establishment partners to attract a sufficient number of guests, players and other visitors in these locations could adversely affect Accel’s business. As a result of the geographic concentration of Accel’s businesses, it faces a greater risk of a negative impact on its results of operations, cash flows and financial condition in the event that Illinois is more severely impacted by any such adverse condition, as compared to other areas in the United States. Accel is subject to similar concentration risks in Georgia and Iowa, if Accel is successful in expanding its operations into Pennsylvania or other gaming
jurisdictions, it may also face similar concentration risk there.
If Accel fails to offer a high-quality experience, its business and reputation may suffer.
Once Accel installs gaming terminals and amusement machines in licensed establishment partners, those licensed establishment partners rely on support from Accel to resolve any related issues. High-quality user and location education and customer service to the licensed establishments have been key to Accel’s brand and is important for the successful marketing and sale of its products and services and to increase the number of gaming terminals and amusement machines at licensed establishments. The importance of high-quality customer service to the licensed establishments will increase as Accel expands its business and pursues new licensed establishment partners
and potentially expands into new jurisdictions. For instance, if Accel does not help its licensed establishment partners quickly resolve issues, whether those issues are regulatory, technical, or data related, and provide an effective ongoing level of support, its ability to retain or renew contracts with its licensed establishment partners could suffer and its reputation with existing or potential licensed establishment partners may be harmed. In some cases, Accel depends on third parties to resolve such issues, the performance of which is out of Accel’s control. Further, Accel’s success is highly dependent on business reputation and positive recommendations from existing licensed establishment partners. Any failure to maintain high-quality levels of service, or a market perception that Accel does not maintain a high-quality service to licensed establishments, could harm its
reputation, its ability to market to existing and prospective licensed establishment partners, and Accel’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
In addition, as Accel continues to grow its operations and expand into additional jurisdictions, Accel needs to be able to provide efficient support that meets the needs of its licensed establishment partners. The number of licensed establishments with Accel’s products has grown significantly and that may place additional pressure on its support organization. As Accel’s base of licensed establishment partners continues to grow, it may need to increase the number of relationship managers, customer service and other personnel it employs to provide personalized account management, assistance to its licensed establishment partners in navigating regulatory applications and ongoing compliance concerns, and customer service, training, and revenue optimization. If Accel
is not able to continue to provide high levels of customer service, its reputation, as well as Accel’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition, could be harmed.
Accel’s revenue growth and ability to achieve and sustain profitability will depend, in part on being able to expand its sales force and increase the productivity of its sales force.
Most of Accel’s revenue has been attributable to the efforts of its sales force, which consists of both in-house personnel and independent agents. In order to increase Accel’s revenue and achieve and sustain profitability, Accel intends to increase the size of its sales force to generate additional revenue from new and existing licensed establishments.
Accel’s ability to achieve significant revenue growth will depend, in large part,
on its success in recruiting, training, and retaining sufficient numbers of in-house and independent sales personnel to support growth. New sales personnel require significant training and can take a number of months to achieve full productivity. Accel’s recent hires and planned hires may not become productive as quickly as expected and if new sales employees and agents do not become fully productive on the timelines that have been projected or at all, Accel’s revenue may not increase at anticipated levels and its ability to achieve long-term projections may be negatively impacted. In addition, as Accel continues to grow, a larger percentage of its sales force will be new to Accel and its business, which may adversely affect Accel’s sales if it cannot train its sales force quickly or effectively. Attrition rates may increase, and Accel may face integration challenges as it continues to seek to expand its sales force. Accel also believes that there is significant competition
for sales personnel with the skills that it requires in the industries in which it operates and may be unable to hire or retain sufficient numbers of qualified individuals in the markets where it operates or plans to operate. If Accel is unable to hire and train sufficient numbers of effective sales personnel or agents, or if the sales personnel or agents are not successful in obtaining new licensed establishment partners or promoting activity within Accel’s existing licensed establishment partners, Accel’s business may be adversely affected.
Accel periodically changes and adjusts its sales organization in response to market opportunities, competitive threats, management changes, product and service introductions or enhancements, acquisitions, sales performance, increases in sales headcount, cost levels, and other internal and external considerations. Any future sales organization
changes may result in a
temporary reduction of productivity, which could negatively affect Accel’s rate of growth. In addition, any significant change to the way Accel structures the compensation of its sales organization may be disruptive and may affect revenue growth.
Accel’s inability to complete acquisitions and integrate acquired businesses successfully could limit its growth or disrupt its plans and operations.
Accel continues to pursue expansion and acquisition opportunities in gaming and related businesses. Accel’s ability to succeed
in implementing its strategy will depend to some degree upon its ability to identify and complete commercially viable acquisitions. Accel may not be able to find acquisition opportunities on acceptable terms or at all, or obtain necessary financing or regulatory approvals to complete potential acquisitions.
Accel may not be able to successfully integrate any businesses that it acquires or do so within intended timeframes. Accel could face significant challenges in managing and integrating its acquisitions and combined operations, including acquired assets, operations and personnel, as well as maintaining or developing, procedures and policies (including effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures). In addition, the expected cost synergies associated with such acquisitions may not be
fully realized in the anticipated amounts or within the contemplated timeframes or cost expectations, which could result in increased costs and have an adverse effect on Accel’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Accel expects to incur incremental costs and capital expenditures related to its contemplated integration activities.
Acquisition transactions may disrupt Accel’s ongoing business. The integration of acquisitions will require significant time and focus from management and may divert attention from the day-to-day operations of the combined business or delay the achievement of strategic objectives. These risks may be heightened when Accel enters into regions where it has no or limited prior experience. Accel’s business may be negatively impacted following the acquisitions if it is unable to effectively manage expanded operations.
Accel
faces significant competition from other gaming and entertainment operations, and Accel’s success in part relies on maintaining Accel’s competitive advantages and market share in key markets.
Accel faces significant competition from suppliers and other operators of gaming terminals and dartboards, pool tables, pinball and other related non-gaming equipment at licensed establishment partners. Accel competes on the basis of the responsiveness of its services, and the popularity, content, features, quality, functionality, accuracy, and reliability of its products. In order to remain competitive and maintain Accel’s existing market share, Accel must continuously offer popular, high-quality games in a timely manner and new services or enhancements to its existing services. These services or enhancements may not be well received by licensed establishment partners or consumers, even
if well reviewed and of high quality. In addition, some of Accel’s current and future competitors may enjoy substantial competitive advantages over it, such as greater name recognition, longer operating histories, or greater financial, technical, and other resources. These companies may use these advantages to offer services that respond better to the needs of licensed establishment partners, spend more on advertising and brand marketing, expand their operations, or respond more quickly and effectively than Accel does or can to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards, regulatory conditions or requirements, or player preferences. These competitors could use these advantages to capture additional market share to Accel’s detriment in key markets. Additionally, Accel could lose some or all of the competitive advantages that it currently enjoys over its current and potential competitors. Accel also faces high levels of competition related to newly legalized
gaming jurisdictions and for openings of new or expanded licensed establishments. Accel’s success depends on its ability to successfully enter new markets and compete successfully for new business, which is not certain to occur. Any of these developments could have an adverse effect on Accel’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition and could result in a loss of market share in key markets.
Accel operates in the highly competitive gaming industry, and Accel’s success depends on its ability to effectively compete with numerous types of businesses in a rapidly evolving, and potentially expanding, gaming environment.
While Accel’s operations face competition from many forms of leisure and entertainment activities, including shopping, athletic events, television and movies, concerts, and travel, Accel faces particularly robust competition from other forms of
gaming. The gaming industry is characterized by an increasingly high degree of competition among a large number of participants on both a local and national level, including casinos, Internet gaming, sports betting, sweepstakes and poker machines not located in casinos, horse racetracks, including those featuring slot machines and/or table games, fantasy sports, real money iGaming, and other forms of gaming, such as, Internet-based lotteries, sweepstakes, and fantasy sports, and Internet-based or mobile-based gaming platforms, which allow their players to wager on a wide variety of sporting events and/or play casino games from home or in non-casino settings. This could divert players from using Accel’s products in licensed establishment partners, and adversely affect its business. Even Internet wagering services that are illegal under federal and state law but operate from overseas locations, may nevertheless
be accessible to domestic gamblers and divert players from visiting licensed establishment partners to play on Accel’s gaming terminals.
The availability of competing gaming activities could increase substantially in the future. Voters and state legislatures may seek to supplement traditional tax revenue sources of state governments by authorizing or expanding gaming in Illinois, Georgia, or Iowa, adjacent states or jurisdictions where Accel plans to operate in the future, such as Pennsylvania. For example, on June 2, 2019, the Illinois legislature passed a significant gaming expansion bill authorizing the addition of multiple casinos to the state, including a casino in Chicago, permitting slot and table games at three horse racetracks, adding slot machines to two airports and creating licensing criteria for those eligible to
provide sports betting services. In addition, other jurisdictions are considering or have already recently legalized, implemented and expanded gaming, and there are proposals across the country that would legalize Internet poker and other varieties of Internet gaming in a number of states and at the federal level. For example, in November 2017, Pennsylvania adopted legislation allowing regulated online poker and casino-style games within the commonwealth and legalizing sports betting in casinos. In addition, established gaming jurisdictions could award additional gaming licenses or permit the expansion or relocation of existing gaming operations (including gaming terminals). See “ —Accel’s revenue growth and future success depends on its ability to expand into new markets, which may not occur as anticipated or at all” for more information. While Accel believes it is well positioned
to take advantage of certain of these opportunities, expansion of gaming in other jurisdictions (both legal and illegal) could further compete with Accel’s gaming terminals, which could have an adverse impact on Accel’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
The concentration and evolution of the gaming terminal manufacturing industry could impose additional costs on Accel.
A majority of Accel’s revenue is attributable to gaming terminals and related systems supplied by it at licensed establishment partners. A substantial majority of the gaming terminals sold in the U.S. in recent years have been manufactured by a few select companies, and there has been extensive consolidation within the gaming equipment sector in recent years, including the acquisitions of Bally
Technologies, Inc. (which had acquired SHFL Entertainment, Inc.) and WMS Industries, Inc. by Scientific Games Corporation (“Scientific Games”) and International Game Technology PLC by GTECH S.p.A, respectively.
Consolidation may force Accel to enter into purchase arrangements for new gaming terminals that are more expensive to operate than its existing gaming terminals. If the newer gaming terminals do not result in sufficient incremental revenues to offset the potential increased investment and costs, it could damage Accel’s profitability. In the event that Accel loses a supplier, it may be unable to replace such supplier, and Accel’s remaining suppliers may increase fees and costs. See “— An increase in
Accel’s borrowing costs would negatively affect its financial condition, cash flow and results of operations”.
Accel’s operations are largely dependent on the skill and experience of its management and key personnel. The loss of management and other key personnel could significantly harm Accel’s business, and it may not be able to effectively replace members of management who may leave Accel.
Accel’s success and competitive position are largely dependent upon, among other things, the efforts and skills of its senior executives and management team, including Andrew H. Rubenstein as the Chief Executive Officer and President, Karl Peterson as Chairman of the Board, Brian
Carroll as Chief Financial Officer and Derek Harmer as General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer. Although Accel has entered into employment agreements with senior executives and key personnel, there can be no assurance that these individuals will remain employed. If Accel loses the services of any members of its management team or other key personnel, its business may be significantly impaired.
In particular, Mr. Carroll has notified Accel that he will retire as the Company’s Chief Financial
Officer by April 30, 2022. In the interim, Mr. Carroll will remain in his current role while the Company conducts a search for a new Chief Financial Officer. After April 30, 2022, Mr. Carroll will assist the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the next Chief Financial Officer in the transition thereafter until Mr. Carroll’s eventual retirement from the Company at the end of 2023. If we are unable to recruit and retain a qualified replacement in a timely manner it could result in management, operating and financial reporting difficulties, which could have an adverse effect on our business.
Accel
relies on assumptions and estimates to calculate certain key metrics, and real or perceived inaccuracies in such metrics may harm its reputation and negatively affect its business.
Accel regularly reviews metrics, including the number of players and other measures, to evaluate growth trends, measure performance and make strategic decisions. Additionally, Accel commits significant amounts of resources and employee time to understanding the inherent historical patterns of gaming results within individual licensed establishment partners. Accel uses this pattern recognition process to implement more optimal gaming layouts for licensed establishment partners, with the goal of generating increased gaming revenue.
Certain of Accel’s key metrics, including the average post-acquisition net video gaming revenue per location per day (“location
hold-per-day”) and a number of other measures to evaluate growth trends and the quality of marketing and player behaviors, are calculated using data from Scientific Games, a contractor of the IGB. Scientific Games and the IGB may calculate certain metrics differently, which could limit the comparability of Accel’s key metrics and those of its competitors, who may use a different methodology to calculate similar metrics. For example, the IGB calculates location hold-per-day and other metrics using the number of gaming terminals that are active at the end of a given month, while Scientific Games uses the number of gaming terminals that are active at least one day during a month. See “Accel Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Key Business Metrics” for more information. While
Accel believe these figures to be reasonable and that its reliance on them is justified, there can be no assurance that such figures are reliable or accurate. Should Accel decide to review these or other figures, it may discover material inaccuracies, including unexpected errors in its internal data that result from technical or other errors. If Accel determines that any of its metrics are not accurate, they may be required to revise or cease reporting such metrics and such changes may harm Accel’s reputation and business.
Accel’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition could be affected by natural events in the locations in which it or its licensed establishment partners, suppliers or regulators operate.
Accel may be impacted by severe weather and other geological events, including hurricanes, tornados, earthquakes, floods or tsunamis that could disrupt operations
or the operations of its licensed establishment partners, suppliers, data service providers and regulators. Natural disasters or other disruptions at any of Accel’s facilities or suppliers’ facilities may impair or delay the operation, development, provisions or delivery of its products and services. Additionally, disruptions experienced by Accel’s regulators due to natural disasters or otherwise could delay the introduction of new products or entry into new jurisdictions where regulatory approval is necessary. While Accel insures against certain business interruption risks, there can be no assurance that such insurance will adequately compensate for any losses incurred as a result of natural or other disasters. Any serious disruption to Accel’s operations, or those of its licensed establishment partners, suppliers, data service providers, or regulators, could have an adverse effect on Accel’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Risks
Related to Compliance and Regulatory Matters
Accel is subject to strict government regulations that are constantly evolving and may be amended, repealed, or subject to new interpretations, which may limit existing operations, have an adverse impact on the ability to grow or may expose Accel to fines or other penalties.
Accel is subject to the rules, regulations, and laws applicable to gaming, including, but not limited to, the Illinois Video Gaming Act, the Pennsylvania Gaming Act and the Georgia Lottery for Education Act. These gaming laws and related regulations are administered by the IGB, PA Board, and GLC, respectively, which are regulatory boards with broad authority to create and interpret gaming regulations and to regulate gaming activities. These gaming authorities are authorized to:
•adopt additional rules and regulations under the implementing statutes;
•investigate violations of gaming regulations;
•enforce gaming regulations and impose disciplinary sanctions for violations of such laws, including fines, penalties and revocation of gaming licenses;
•review the character and fitness of manufacturers, distributors and operators of gaming services and equipment and make determinations regarding their suitability or qualification for licensure;
•review and approve transactions (such as acquisitions, material commercial transactions, securities offerings and debt transactions); and
•establish
and collect related fees and/or taxes.
Although Accel plans to maintain compliance with applicable laws as they evolve and to generally maintain good relations with regulators, there can be no assurance that Accel will do so, and that law enforcement or gaming regulatory authorities will not seek to restrict Accel’s business in their jurisdictions or institute enforcement proceedings if Accel is not compliant. For example, Accel is currently involved in an administrative hearing process with the IGB related to certain alleged violations of the Video Gaming Act and related rules. See “Business — Legal Proceedings” for more information. There can be no assurance that any instituted enforcement proceedings will be favorably resolved, or that such proceedings will not have an adverse effect on its ability to retain and renew existing licenses or to obtain new licenses in other jurisdictions.
Gaming authorities may levy fines against Accel or seize certain assets if Accel violates gaming regulations. Accel’s reputation may also be damaged by any legal or regulatory investigation, regardless of whether Accel is ultimately accused of, or found to have committed, any violation. A negative regulatory finding or ruling in one jurisdiction could have adverse consequences in other jurisdictions, including with gaming regulators.
In addition to regulatory compliance risk, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Georgia or any other states or other jurisdiction in which Accel operates or may operate (including jurisdictions at the county, district, municipal, town or borough level), may amend or repeal gaming enabling legislation or regulations. Changes to gaming enabling legislation or new interpretations of existing gaming laws may hinder or prevent Accel from continuing to operate in the jurisdictions where it currently conducts business,
which could increase operating expenses and compliance costs or decrease the profitability of operations. Repeal of gaming enabling legislation could result in losses of capital investments and revenue, limit future growth opportunities and have an adverse effect on Accel’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. If any jurisdiction in which Accel operates were to repeal gaming enabling legislation, there could be no assurance that Accel could sufficiently increase revenue in other markets to maintain operations or service existing indebtedness. In particular, the enactment of unfavorable legislation or government efforts affecting or directed at gaming terminal manufacturers or gaming operators, such as referendums to increase gaming taxes or requirements to use local distributors, would likely have a negative impact on operations. For example, in June 2019, the Illinois legislature approved a gaming
expansion bill that, in addition to providing for an increased number of possible gaming venues, also increases Illinois state tax on gaming revenue. Additionally, membership changes within regulatory agencies could impact operations. The IGB in particular has experienced significant personnel changes since the commencement of Accel’s gaming terminal operations in 2012. Changes in the composition of the IGB can impact current rules, regulations, policies, enforcement trends and overall agendas of the IGB.
Accel is obligated to develop and maintain proper and effective internal control over financial reporting. Accel has identified three material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting and if remediation of these material weaknesses is not effective, or if Accel fails to develop and maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal control over
financial reporting, its ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable laws and regulations could be impaired and its reputation and business could be adversely affected. In addition, the presence of material weaknesses increases the risk of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements.
Accel is currently a public company and is required, pursuant to Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting on its Annual Report on Form 10-K. Effective internal control over financial reporting
is necessary for reliable financial reports and, together with adequate disclosure controls and procedures, such internal controls are designed to prevent fraud. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could cause Accel to fail to meet its reporting obligations. Ineffective internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our Class A-1 common stock.
The report by management needs to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified in internal control over financial reporting. However, for as long as Accel is an “emerging growth company” under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (“JOBS Act”) following the consummation of the merger of TPG Pace Holding Corp. and Accel Entertainment, Inc. (the “Business Combination”),
its independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to attest to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”). Management’s assessment of internal controls, could detect problems with internal controls, and an independent assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls by Accel’s auditors could detect further problems that management’s assessment might not and could result in the identification of material weaknesses that were not otherwise identified. Undetected material weaknesses in internal controls could lead to financial statement restatements and require Accel to incur the expense of remediation.
In connection with the preparation of its consolidated financial statements for 2018, Accel identified a number of adjustments to its consolidated financial statements that resulted in a
restatement of previously issued financial statements. These adjustments related to accounting for business acquisitions and subsequent accounting, accounting for route and customer acquisition costs and related liabilities, classification of items on the consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows, accounting for income taxes, and other miscellaneous adjustments. Accel identified the cause of these adjustments was due to three material weaknesses in internal controls. A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of deficiencies in its internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of its consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. This deficiency could result in additional misstatements to its consolidated financial statements that would be material and would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
The
following three material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting were identified, which were not remediated as of December 31, 2021, or currently:
•A material weakness in the design and implementation of the Company’s internal controls relating to review of the consolidated financial statements and certain of the associated accounting analysis, journal entries, non-recurring transactions and accounting reconciliations due, in part, to the lack of formally documented accounting policies and procedures, as well as headcount necessary to support consistent, timely and accurate financial reporting in accordance with U.S. GAAP;
•A material weakness in the design and implementation of
the Company’s internal controls relating to business combination accounting and route and customer acquisition cost accounting due to the absence of formalized internal controls surrounding the determination of the fair value and the accounting for assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations and the accounting for the initial route and customer acquisition costs; and
•A material weakness in the Company’s general information technology controls including the design and implementation of access and change management internal controls.
Accel has begun evaluating and implementing additional procedures in order to remediate these material weaknesses, however, it cannot
assure you that these or other measures will fully remediate the material weaknesses in a timely manner. As part of the remediation plan to address the material weakness identified above, Accel has hired additional accounting and finance employees with the specific technical accounting and financial reporting experience necessary for a public company. Accel has hired these personnel after considering the appropriateness of each individual’s experience and believe that these personnel are
qualified to serve in their current respective roles. In addition, Accel has begun to implement more formal accounting policies and procedures to support timely and accurate
financial reporting in accordance with GAAP. Accel will continue to assess the adequacy of its accounting and finance personnel and resources, and will add additional personnel, as well as adjust its resources, as necessary, commensurate with any increase in the size and complexity of its business. Accel also increased the depth and level of review procedures with regard to financial reporting and internal control procedures. If Accel is unable to remediate these material weaknesses, or otherwise maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, it may not be able to report its financial results accurately, prevent fraud or file its periodic reports in a timely manner. If Accel’s remediation of these material weaknesses is not effective, if Accel’s independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion on the effectiveness of its internal control or if it experiences additional material weaknesses or otherwise fails to maintain an effective
system of internal controls in the future, it may not be able to accurately or timely report its financial condition or results of operations, which may cause Accel to become subject to investigation or sanctions by the SEC or adversely affect investor confidence in Accel and, as a result, the value of our Class A-1 common stock. There can be no assurance that all existing material weaknesses have been identified, or that additional material weaknesses will not be identified in the future. In addition, if Accel is unable to continue to meet its financial reporting obligations, it may not be able to remain listed on the NYSE.
Accel may be liable for product defects or other claims relating to its products that it provides to its licensed establishment partners.
The products that Accel provides to its licensed establishment partners could be defective, fail to perform as designed
or otherwise cause harm to players or licensed establishment partners. If any of the products Accel provides are defective, Accel may be required to recall the products and/or repair or replace them, which could result in substantial expenses and affect profitability. In the event of any repair or recall, Accel could be dependent on the services, responsiveness or product stock of key suppliers, and any delay in their ability to resupply or assist in servicing key products could affect its ability to maintain the gaming terminals in licensed establishment partners. Any problem with the performance of Accel’s products could harm its reputation, which could result in a loss of existing or potential licensed establishments and players. In addition, the occurrence of errors in, or fraudulent manipulation of, Accel’s products or software may give rise to claims by licensed establishment partners or by players, including claims by licensed establishment partners for lost revenues
and related litigation that could result in significant liability. Any claims brought against Accel by licensed establishment partners or players may result in the diversion of management’s time and attention, expenditure of large amounts of cash on legal fees and payment of damages, lower demand for products or services, or injury to reputation. Accel’s insurance or recourse against other parties may not sufficiently cover a judgment against it or a settlement payment, and any insurance payment is subject to customary deductibles, limits and exclusions. In addition, a judgment against Accel or a settlement could make it difficult for it to obtain insurance in the coverage amounts necessary to adequately insure its businesses, or at all, and could materially increase insurance premiums and deductibles. Software bugs or malfunctions, errors in distribution or installation of Accel’s software, failure of products to perform as approved by the appropriate regulatory bodies
or other errors or malfunctions, may subject Accel to investigation or other action by gaming regulatory authorities, including fines.
Litigation may adversely affect Accel’s business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Accel is currently involved in several lawsuits. See “Business — Legal Proceedings” for more information. Accel may also become subject to litigation claims in the operation of its business, including, but not limited to, with respect to employee matters, alleged product and system malfunctions, alleged intellectual property infringement and claims relating to contracts, licenses, acquisitions and strategic investments. Accel may incur significant expense defending or settling any such litigation. Additionally,
adverse judgments that may be decided against Accel could result in significant monetary damages or injunctive relief that could adversely affect Accel’s ability to conduct business, its results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
If Accel’s estimates or judgments relating to critical accounting policies prove to be incorrect or financial reporting standards or interpretations change, its operating results could be adversely affected.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in its consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Accel bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the
circumstances, as provided in “Accel Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets, liabilities, and equity as of the date of the financial statements, and the amount of revenue and expenses, during the periods presented, that are not readily apparent from other sources. Significant assumptions and estimates used in preparing consolidated financial statements include among other things, the useful lives for depreciable and amortizable assets, income tax provisions, the evaluation of the future realization of deferred tax assets, projected cash flows in assessing the initial valuation of intangible assets in conjunction with business acquisitions, the initial selection of useful lives for depreciable and amortizable assets in conjunction with business acquisitions,
the fair value of convertible note investments, contingencies, and the expected term of share-based compensation awards and stock price volatility when computing share-based compensation expense. Accel’s operating results may be adversely affected if assumptions change or if actual circumstances differ from assumed circumstances, which could cause its operating results to fall below the expectations of industry or financial analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in the trading price of its common stock.
Additionally, Accel regularly monitors compliance with applicable financial reporting standards and reviews relevant new accounting pronouncements and drafts thereof. As a result of new standards, changes to existing standards, and changes in interpretation, Accel may be required to change accounting policies, alter operational policies and implement new or enhance existing systems so that they reflect new or amended
financial reporting standards, or it may be required to restate published financial statements. Such changes to existing standards or changes in their interpretation may cause an adverse deviation from Accel’s revenue and operating profit target, which may negatively impact results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Accel may not have adequate insurance for potential liabilities.
In the ordinary course of business, Accel has, and in the future may become the subject of, various claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings seeking damages or other remedies concerning its commercial operations, products, employees and other matters. Accel maintains insurance to cover these and other potential losses, and is subject to various self-retentions, deductibles and caps under its insurance. Accel faces the following risks
with respect to insurance coverage:
•Accel may not be able to continue to obtain insurance on commercially reasonable terms;
•Accel may incur losses from interruptions of business that exceed insurance coverage;
•Accel may be faced with types of liabilities that will not be covered by insurance;
•Accel’s insurance carriers may not be able to meet their obligations under the policies; or
•the dollar amount of any liabilities may exceed policy limits.
Even a partially uninsured claim, if successful and of significant size, could have an adverse
effect on Accel’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Even in cases where Accel maintains insurance coverage, its insurers may raise various objections and exceptions to coverage that could make uncertain the timing and amount of any possible insurance recovery.
Accel’s business depends on the protection of intellectual property and proprietary information.
Accel believes that its success depends, in part, on protecting its intellectual property. Accel’s intellectual property includes certain trademarks and copyrights relating to its products and services, and proprietary or confidential information that is not subject to patent or similar protection. As of December 31, 2021, Accel owned 12 registered trademarks and 103 registered domain
names. Accel’s success may depend, in part, on its ability to obtain protection for the trademarks, trade dress, names, logos or symbols under which it markets products and to obtain copyright and patent protection for proprietary technologies, designs, software and innovations. There can be no assurance that Accel will be able to build and maintain consumer value in its trademarks, obtain patent, trademark or copyright protection or that any patent, trademark or copyright will provide competitive advantages.
Accel’s intellectual property protects the integrity of its systems, products
and services. Competitors may independently offer similar or superior products, software or systems, which could negatively impact results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. In cases where Accel’s technology or product is not protected by enforceable intellectual property rights, such independent development may result in a significant diminution in the value of such technology or product.
Accel also relies on trade secrets and proprietary knowledge and enters into confidentiality agreements with employees and independent contractors regarding trade secrets and proprietary information, however, there can be no assurance that the obligation to maintain the confidentiality of trade secrets and proprietary information will be honored.
Accel may, in the future, make claims
of infringement, invalidity or enforceability against third parties. This could:
•cause Accel to incur greater costs and expenses in the protection of intellectual property;
•potentially negatively impact its intellectual property rights;
•cause one or more of its patents, trademarks, copyrights or other intellectual property interests to be ruled or rendered unenforceable or invalid; or
•divert management’s attention and resources.
Gaming opponents persist in their efforts to curtail the expansion of legalized gaming, which, if successful, could limit the growth of operations.
There is significant debate over,
and opposition to, the gaming industry. There can be no assurance that this opposition will not succeed in preventing the legalization of gaming in jurisdictions where it is presently prohibited, prohibiting or limiting the expansion of gaming where it is currently permitted or causing the repeal of legalized gaming in any jurisdiction. Such opposition could also lead these jurisdictions to adopt legislation or impose a regulatory framework to govern gaming that restricts Accel’s ability to advertise games or substantially increases costs to comply with these regulations. Accel continues to devote significant attention to monitoring these developments, however, Accel cannot accurately predict the likelihood, timing, scope or terms of any state or federal legislation or regulation relating to its business. Any successful effort to curtail the expansion of, or limit or prohibit, legalized gaming could have an adverse effect
on Accel’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
For example, the Illinois legislature approved a gaming expansion bill in June 2019 that, in addition to providing for an increased number of possible gaming venues, also increased Illinois state tax on gaming revenue. Any tax increase by the state of Illinois, whether levied on licensed establishments or Accel, could have an adverse effect on Accel’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Current and future appointees to the IGB may enact, change or rescind other rules and regulations in a way that negatively affects business.
Accel may not be able to capitalize on the expansion of gaming or other trends and changes in the gaming industries, including due to laws and regulations governing these industries, and other factors.
Accel
participates in new and evolving aspects of the gaming industries. These industries involve significant risks and uncertainties, including legal, business and financial risks. The fast-changing environment in these industries can make it difficult to plan strategically and can provide opportunities for competitors to grow their businesses at Accel’s expense. Consequently, future results of operations, cash flows and financial condition are difficult to predict and may not grow at expected rates.
Part of Accel’s strategy is to take advantage of the liberalization of regulations covering these industries on a municipality and state basis, which can be a protracted process. To varying degrees, governments have taken steps to change the regulation of gaming terminals through the implementation
of new or revised licensing and taxation regimes. For example, in addition to the State-issued gaming licenses, gaming licenses are also governed on a municipality-level in Illinois. While Accel has contracted for exclusive rights to operate in licensed establishments in over 600 different municipalities in Illinois, all of which have no prohibition or restriction with respect to gaming, there are many other municipalities that have “opt out” or “anti-gambling”
ordinances which prohibit a range of activities characterized from “devices of chance” to “any gambling”. While a number of these municipalities have removed the ordinance
or introduced an amendment to permit gaming activities germane to Accel’s business, they or other municipalities may choose to prohibit or limit gambling in the future. Additionally, Pennsylvania currently only permits the operation of gaming terminals at truck stops. While there are currently efforts to permit the expansion of gaming terminals into additional types of establishments, there can be no assurance that such efforts will succeed, or that gaming operations at truck stops will be continued to be permitted. Accel cannot predict the timing, scope or terms of the implementation or revision of any such state, federal or local laws or regulations, or the extent to which any such laws and regulations may facilitate or hinder its strategy.
Accel’s success depends on the security and integrity of the systems and products offered, and security breaches or other disruptions could compromise certain information and expose Accel
to liability, which could cause Accel’s business and reputation to suffer.
Accel believes that success depends, in large part, on providing secure products, services and systems to licensed establishments and players, and on the ability to avoid, detect, replicate and correct software and hardware anomalies and fraudulent manipulation of products and services. Accel’s business sometimes involves the storage, processing and transmission of proprietary, confidential and personal information, and any future player program it may institute will also involve such information. Accel also maintains certain other proprietary and confidential information relating to its business and personal information of its personnel. All of Accel’s products, services and systems are designed with security features to prevent fraudulent activity. Despite these security measures, Accel’s products, services
and systems may be vulnerable to attacks by licensed establishment partners, players, retailers, vendors or employees, or breaches due to cyber-attacks, viruses, malicious software, computer hacking, security breaches or other disruptions. Expanded use of the Internet and other interactive technologies may result in increased security risks for Accel and its licensed establishment partners because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and often are not foreseeable or recognized until launched against a target and Accel may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Furthermore, hackers and data thieves are becoming increasingly sophisticated and could operate large-scale and complex automated attacks. Any security breach or incident could result in unauthorized access to, misuse of, or unauthorized acquisition of certain data, the loss, corruption
or alteration of this data, interruptions in operations or damage to computers or systems or those of certain players or third-party platforms. Any of these incidents could expose Accel to claims, litigation, fines and potential liability. Accel’s ability to prevent anomalies and monitor and ensure the quality and integrity of its products and services is periodically reviewed and enhanced, and Accel regularly assesses the adequacy of security systems, including the security of its games and software, to protect against any material loss to licensed establishment partners and players, as well as the integrity of its products and services and its games. However, these measures may not be sufficient to prevent future attacks, breaches or disruptions.
There is a risk that Accel’s products, services or systems may be used to defraud, launder money or engage in other illegal activities
at licensed establishments. Accel’s gaming machines have also experienced anomalies in the past. Games and gaming machines may be replaced by Accel and other gaming machine operators if they do not perform according to expectations, or they may be shut down by regulators. The occurrence of anomalies in, or fraudulent manipulation of, Accel’s gaming machines or other products and services, may give rise to claims from players or licensed establishment partners, may lead to claims for lost revenue and profits and related litigation by licensed establishment partners and may subject Accel to investigation or other action by regulatory authorities, including suspension or revocation of licenses or other disciplinary action. Additionally, in the event of the occurrence of any such issues with Accel’s products and services, substantial resources may be diverted from other projects to correct these issues, which may delay other projects and the achievement of strategic objectives.
Further,
third party hosted solution providers that provide services to Accel, such as Rackspace, Salesforce or NetSuite, have in the past been subject to cyber security incidents. Although these incidents have not had a material impact to date on our business, results of operations, financial condition or reputation to date, a future failure of these third parties’ security systems and infrastructure could adversely affect us.
Accel’s
level of indebtedness and its related variable interest rate could adversely affect results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
As of December 31, 2021, Accel had total indebtedness of $350.0 million, all of which was borrowed under its current Credit Agreement, and had approximately $550.0 million of availability.
Accel’s level of indebtedness could affect its ability to obtain financing or refinance existing indebtedness; require Accel to dedicate a significant portion of its cash flow from operations to interest and principal payments on indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, repurchases of its shares of Class A-1 common stock and other general corporate purposes, increase its vulnerability to adverse general economic, industry or competitive developments
or conditions and limit its flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its businesses and the industries in which it operates or in pursuing its strategic objectives. In addition, Accel is exposed to the risk of higher interest rates as a significant portion of its borrowings are at variable rates of interest. If interest rates increase, the interest payment obligations would increase even if the amount borrowed remained the same, and results of operations, cash flows and financial condition could be negatively impacted. All of these factors could place Accel at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors that may have less debt.
An increase in Accel’s borrowing costs could negatively affect its financial condition, cash flow and results of operations.
Certain of Accel’s gaming terminal and amusement machine acquisitions
are financed using revolving credit facilities and bank loans. Accel’s financing agreements include variable interest rates and regular required interest, fee and amortization payments. If Accel is unable to generate sufficient revenue to offset the required payments, it could have an adverse effect on Accel’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. In addition, Accel is not currently involved in any interest rate hedging activities. Any such hedging activities could require Accel to incur additional costs, and there can be no assurance that Accel would be able to successfully protect itself from any or all negative interest rate fluctuations at a reasonable cost.
Accel may not have sufficient cash flows from operating activities, cash on hand and available borrowings under its credit agreement to finance required capital expenditures under new contracts
and meet other cash needs.
Accel’s business generally requires significant upfront capital expenditures for gaming terminals and amusement machines, software customization and implementation, systems and equipment installation and telecommunications configuration. In connection with the signing or renewal of a gaming or amusement contract, Accel may provide new equipment or impose new service requirements at a licensed establishment, which may require additional capital expenditures in order to enter into or retain the contract. Historically, Accel has funded these upfront costs through cash flows generated from operations, available cash on hand and
borrowings under the Credit Agreement.
In addition, since Accel is not paid for expenses and services, Accel may incur upfront costs (which may be significant) prior to receipt of any revenue under such arrangements. Accel’s ability to generate revenue and to continue to procure new contracts will depend on, among other things, its then present liquidity levels or its ability to obtain additional financing on commercially reasonable terms.
If Accel does not have adequate liquidity or is unable to obtain financing for these upfront costs and other cash needs on favorable terms or at all, it may not be able to pursue certain contracts,
which could result in the loss of business or restrict the ability to grow. Moreover, Accel may not realize the return on investment that it anticipates on new or renewed contracts due to a variety of factors, including lower than anticipated retail sales or amounts wagered, higher than anticipated capital or operating expenses and unanticipated regulatory developments or litigation. Accel may not have adequate liquidity to pursue other aspects of its strategy, including bringing products and services to new licensed establishment partners or new or underpenetrated geographies (including through equity investments) or pursuing strategic acquisitions. In the event Accel pursues significant acquisitions or other expansion opportunities, conducts significant repurchases of outstanding securities, or refinances or repays existing debt, it may need to raise additional capital either
through the public or private issuance of equity or debt securities or
through additional borrowings under its existing financing arrangements, which sources of funds may not necessarily be available on acceptable terms, if at all.
Accel may not have sufficient cash flows from operating activities to service all of its indebtedness and other obligations, and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy obligations, which may not be successful.
Accel’s ability to make payments on and to refinance indebtedness and other
obligations depends on its results of operations, cash flows and financial condition, which in turn are subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond its control. Accel may not be able to maintain a level of cash flows from operating activities sufficient to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest on its indebtedness and other obligations.
Accel is required to make scheduled payments of principal in respect of the term loans under the Credit Agreement. Accel may also, from time to time, repurchase, or otherwise retire or refinance debt, through subsidiaries or otherwise. Such activities, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, contractual restrictions and other factors, and the amounts involved may or
may not be material. If Accel needs to refinance all or part of its indebtedness at or before maturity, there can be no assurance that Accel will be able to obtain new financing or to refinance any of its indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
Accel’s lenders, including the lenders participating in its delayed draw and/or revolving credit facilities under the Credit Agreement, may become insolvent or tighten their lending standards, which could make it more difficult for Accel to borrow under its delayed draw and/or revolving credit facilities or to obtain other financing on favorable terms or at all. Accel’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition could be adversely affected if Accel is unable to draw funds under its delayed draw and/or revolving credit facilities because of a lender default or to obtain other cost-effective financing. Any default by a lender in
its obligation to fund its commitment under the delayed draw and/or revolving credit facilities (or its participation in letters of credit) could limit Accel’s liquidity to the extent of the defaulting lender’s commitment. If Accel is unable to generate sufficient cash flow in the future to meet commitments, it may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as refinancing or restructuring indebtedness, selling material assets or operations or seeking to raise additional debt or equity capital. In addition, borrowings under Accel’s existing revolving credit facilities may be subject to capacity under an available borrowing base.
Agreements governing Accel’s indebtedness impose certain restrictions that may affect the ability to operate its business. Failure to comply with any of these restrictions could result in the acceleration of the maturity of indebtedness and require Accel to make payments on indebtedness. Were
this to occur, Accel would not have sufficient cash to pay accelerated indebtedness.
Agreements governing Accel’s indebtedness impose, and future financing agreements are likely to impose, operating and financial restrictions on activities that may adversely affect its ability to finance future operations or capital needs or to engage in new business activities. In some cases, these restrictions require Accel to comply with or maintain certain financial tests and ratios. Subject to certain exceptions, Accel’s credit facilities restrict its ability to, among other things:
•incur or guarantee additional indebtedness;
•make loans to others;
•make investments;
•merge
or consolidate with another entity;
•make dividends and certain other payments, including payment of junior debt, and repurchases of Accel's A-1 common stock;
•create liens that secure indebtedness and guarantees thereof;
•in the case of Accel Entertainment, Inc., change its passive holding company status.
In addition, the Credit Agreement contains financial covenants that require Accel to maintain (a) a ratio of consolidated first lien net debt to consolidated EBITDA no greater than 4.50 to 1.00 and (b) a ratio of (i) (A) consolidated EBITDA minus (B) the sum of (i) cash taxes, (ii) 3.00% of consolidated revenue, (iii) operator earnout payments and (iv) regularly scheduled dividend payments that are financed with internally generated cash flow to consolidated fixed charges no less than 1.20 to 1.00, in each case, tested as of the last day of each full fiscal quarter ending after November
20, 2019 and determined on the basis of the four most recently ended fiscal quarters of Accel for which financial statements have been or are required to have been delivered pursuant to the Credit Agreement, subject to customary “equity cure” rights. If an event of default (as such term is defined in the Credit Agreement) occurs, the administrative agent on behalf of the lenders would be entitled to take various actions under certain circumstances, including the acceleration of amounts due under the Credit Agreement, termination of the lenders’ commitments thereunder, foreclosure on collateral, and all other remedial actions available to a secured creditor. The failure to pay certain amounts owing under the Credit Agreement may result in an increase in the interest rate applicable thereto. Cross-default provisions may also be triggered. Under these circumstances, Accel might not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient funds or other resources to satisfy all
of its obligations. In addition, the limitations imposed by financing agreements on Accel’s ability to incur additional debt, cause subsidiaries to guarantee certain debt, pay dividends or make other distributions, or take other actions might significantly impair its ability to obtain other financing.
There can be no assurance that Accel will be granted waivers or amendments to these agreements if for any reason it is unable to comply with these obligations or that it will be able to refinance its debt on terms acceptable or at all.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
TPG Global, LLC, or TPG, Clairvest Group Inc., or Clairvest, and members of the Rubenstein Family own a significant portion of Common
Stock and have representation on the Company Board. TPG and Clairvest, through their respective affiliates, and members of the Rubenstein Family may have interests that differ from those of other stockholders.
As of December 31, 2021, approximately 3% of the shares of our Class A-1 common stock were beneficially owned by Karl Peterson and approximately 18% of the shares of our Class A-1 common stock were beneficially owned by affiliates of Clairvest. Following the consummation of the Business Combination, (i) three directors were jointly nominated by Pace, an affiliate of TPG, the sellers and the shareholder representatives to serve on the
Company Board, (ii) another two directors were jointly nominated by Pace, an affiliate of TPG and the shareholder representatives and (iii) one director was jointly nominated by TPG and Clairvest. While Accel’s subsidiaries (including those holding gaming licenses) manage their respective operations in the ordinary course, TPG and Clairvest may be able to significantly influence the outcome of matters submitted for action by directors of the Board, subject to the Company’s directors’ obligation to act in the interest of all of the Company’s stakeholders, and for stockholder action, including the designation and appointment of the
Company Board (and committees thereof) and approval of significant corporate transactions, including business combinations, consolidations and mergers. So long as TPG and Clairvest continues to directly or indirectly own a significant amount of Accel’s outstanding equity interests and any individuals affiliated with TPG and Clairvest are members of the Company Board and/or any committees thereof, TPG and Clairvest may be able to exert substantial influence on Accel and may be able to exercise its influence in a manner that is not in the interests of Accel’s other stakeholders. TPG's and Clairvest's influence over Accel’s management could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control or otherwise discouraging a potential acquirer from attempting to obtain control of us, which could cause the market price of Class A-1 common stock to decline or prevent public stockholders
from realizing a premium over the market price for Class A-1 common stock. Additionally, TPG and Clairvest and their respective affiliates are in the business of making investments in companies and owning real estate, and may from time to time acquire and hold interests in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with Accel or that supply Accel with goods and services. TPG, Clairvest, or their
respective affiliates may also pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to (or competitive with) Accel’s business, and as a result those acquisition opportunities may not be available to Accel. Prospective investors should consider that the
interests of TPG and Clairvest may differ from their interests in material respects.
In addition, as of December 31, 2021, approximately 9% of the shares of our Class A-1 common stock were beneficially owned by Mr. A. Rubenstein, approximately 3% of the shares of our Class A-1 common stock were beneficially owned by his brother, Mr. G. Rubenstein, and Mr. A. Rubenstein, together with Mr. G. Rubenstein (together, the “Rubenstein Family”) collectively beneficially own approximately 12% of the shares of our Class A-1 common stock. Although each of Mr. A. Rubenstein and Mr. G. Rubenstein, each disclaim legal or beneficial ownership of any shares of Class A-1 common stock owned or controlled by the others, the Rubenstein Family have and may exert significant influence over corporate actions requiring stockholder approval. In addition,
each of Mr. A. Rubenstein and Mr. G. Rubenstein are members of the Company Board. As a result, the Rubenstein Family may be able to significantly influence the outcome of matters submitted for director action, subject to Accel’s director’s obligation to act in the interest of all of Accel’s stakeholders, and for stockholder action, including the designation and appointment of the Company Board (and committees thereof) and approval of significant corporate transactions, including business combinations, consolidations and mergers. So long as the Rubenstein Family continues to directly or indirectly own a significant amount of Accel’s outstanding equity interests and any individuals affiliated with members of the Rubenstein Family are members of the
Company Board and/or any committees thereof, and the Rubenstein Family may be able to exert substantial influence on Accel and may be able to exercise its influence in a manner that is not in the interests of Accel’s other stakeholders. The Rubenstein Family’s influence over Accel’s management could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control or otherwise discouraging a potential acquirer from attempting to obtain control of Accel, which could cause the market price of Class A-1 common stock to decline or prevent public stockholders from realizing a premium over the market price for Class A-1 common stock. Prospective investors should consider that the interests of the Rubenstein Family may differ from their interests in material respects. In addition, pursuant to the Transaction Agreement and subject to certain limitations set forth in the Transaction Agreement, any person who held (together with such person’s affiliates) at least 8% of the outstanding
shares of Class A-1 common stock immediately following the closing of the Stock Purchase in connection with the Business Combination, had the right to nominate an individual to be a member of the Company Board. So long as any such stockholder with director nomination rights continues to directly or indirectly own a significant amount of Accel’s outstanding equity interests and any individuals affiliated with such stockholder are members of the Company Board and/or any committees thereof, such major stockholder may be able to exert substantial influence on Accel and may be able to exercise its influence in a manner that is not in the interests of Accel’s other stakeholders. This influence over Accel’s management could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control or otherwise discouraging
a potential acquirer from attempting to obtain control of Accel, which could cause the market price of Class A-1 common stock to decline or prevent public stockholders from realizing a premium over the market price for Class A-1 common stock.
Holders of common stock are subject to certain gaming regulations, and if a holder is found unsuitable by a gaming authority, that holder would not be able to, directly or indirectly, beneficially own common stock.
Holders of common stock are subject to certain gaming regulations. In Illinois, Georgia, Pennsylvania and other regulated gaming jurisdictions, gaming laws can require any holder of common stock to be disclosed, file an application, be investigated, and qualify or have his, her or its suitability determined by gaming authorities. Gaming laws in Illinois, Georgia, Pennsylvania and other regulated gaming jurisdictions also require
any person who acquires beneficial ownership of more than 5% of voting securities of a gaming company to notify the gaming authorities, and gaming authorities may require such holders to apply for qualification or a finding of suitability, subject to limited exceptions for “institutional investors” that hold a company’s voting securities for investment purposes only. If a holder is found unsuitable by a gaming authority, that holder would not be able to, directly or indirectly, beneficially own common stock.
Gaming authorities have very broad discretion in determining whether an applicant should be deemed suitable. For any cause deemed reasonable by the gaming authorities, subject to certain administrative proceeding requirements, gaming regulators in Illinois, Pennsylvania or elsewhere would have the authority to (i) deny any application; (ii) limit, condition, restrict, revoke, or suspend any license, registration,
finding of suitability or approval, including revoking any licenses held by Accel to conduct business in the state or (iii) fine any person licensed, registered, or found suitable or approved. Any person required by a gaming
authority to be found suitable, who is found unsuitable by the gaming authority, may not hold, directly or indirectly, the beneficial ownership of any voting security or beneficial or record ownership of any non-voting security or any debt security of any public corporation that is registered with the gaming authority beyond the time prescribed by the gaming authority. A finding of unsuitability by a particular gaming authority in
Illinois, Pennsylvania or elsewhere will impact that person’s ability to associate or affiliate with gaming licensees in that particular jurisdiction and could impact the person’s ability to associate or affiliate with gaming licensees in other jurisdictions.
Accel is a holding company and depends on the ability of Accel’s subsidiaries to pay dividends.
Accel has never declared or paid any cash dividends, nor does Accel intend to pay cash dividends. Accel is a holding company without any direct operations and will have no significant assets other than Accel’s ownership interest in its subsidiaries. Accordingly, Accel’s ability to pay dividends will depend upon the financial condition, liquidity and
results of operations of, and Accel’s receipt of dividends, loans or other funds from, its subsidiaries. Accel’s subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and have no obligation to make funds available to Accel. In addition, there are various statutory, regulatory and contractual limitations and business considerations on the extent, if any, to which Accel’s subsidiaries may pay dividends, make loans or otherwise provide funds to Accel. For example, the ability of Accel’s subsidiaries to make distributions, loans and other payments to it for the purposes described above and for any other purpose
will be limited by the terms of the Credit Agreement.
The market price and trading volume of Class A-1 common stock may be volatile and could decline significantly.
The stock markets, including the NYSE have from time-to-time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. Even if an active, liquid and orderly trading market develops and is sustained for the Class A-1 common stock, the market price of Class A-1 common stock may be volatile and could decline significantly. In addition, the trading volume in Class A-1 common stock may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. If the market price of Class A-1 common stock declines significantly, you may be unable to resell your Class A-1 common stock at or above the market price as of the date hereof. Accel cannot assure you that the market price of Class A-1 common stock will not fluctuate widely or decline
significantly in the future in response to a number of factors, including, among others, the following:
•the realization of any of the risk factors presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including risks related to future shutdowns of our operations as a result of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic or other pandemics;
•actual or anticipated differences in Accel’s estimates, or in the estimates of analysts, for Accel’s revenues, Adjusted EBITDA, results of operations, level of indebtedness, liquidity or financial condition;
•additions and departures of key personnel;
•failure to comply with the requirements of the NYSE;
•failure
to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act or other laws or regulations;
•changes to gaming laws, regulations or enforcement policies of applicable gaming authorities;
•future issuances, sales, resales or repurchases or anticipated issuances, sales, resales or repurchases, of Accel’s capital stock;
•publication of research reports about Accel, its licensed establishments or the video gaming terminal industry generally;
•the performance and market valuations of other similar companies;
•commencement of, or involvement in, litigation involving Accel;
•broad disruptions
in the financial markets, including sudden disruptions in the credit markets;
•speculation in the press or investment community;
•actual, potential or perceived control, accounting or reporting problems; and
•changes in accounting principles, policies and guidelines.
In the past, securities class-action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their shares. This type of litigation
could result in substantial costs and divert Accel’s management’s attention and resources, which could have a material adverse effect on Accel.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research, publish inaccurate or unfavorable research or cease publishing research about Accel, our share price and trading volume could decline significantly.
The market for our Class A-1 common stock will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about Accel or its business. If one or more of the analysts who cover Accel downgrade their opinions about Class A-1 common stock, publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about Accel, or cease publishing about it regularly, demand for Class A-1 common stock could decrease, which might cause our share price and trading volume to decline significantly.
Future
issuances of debt securities and equity securities may adversely affect Accel, including the market price of its securities and may be dilutive to existing stockholders.
In the future, Accel may incur debt or issue equity ranking senior to its securities. Those securities will generally have priority upon liquidation. Such securities also may be governed by an indenture or other instrument containing covenants restricting Accel’s operating flexibility. Additionally, any convertible or exchangeable securities that Accel issues in the future may have rights, preferences and privileges more favorable than those of Accel’s securities. Because Accel’s decision to issue debt or equity in the future will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond its control, Accel cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing, nature or success of
future capital raising efforts. As a result, future capital raising efforts may reduce the market price of Accel’s securities and be dilutive to existing stockholders.
The NYSE may delist Accel’s securities from trading on its exchange, which could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in its securities and subject Accel to additional trading restrictions.
Accel's Class A-1 common stock is listed on the NYSE. Although Accel currently meet the minimum initial listing standards set forth in the NYSE listing standards, there can be no assurance that our Class A-1 common stock will continue to be listed on the NYSE in the future. In order to continue listing Accel’s securities on the NYSE, Accel must maintain certain financial, distribution and share price levels. For instance, Accel must maintain a minimum of 300 public stockholders of its Class A-1 common
stock on an ongoing basis under the NYSE's continued listing standards.
If the NYSE delists Accel’s securities from trading on its exchange and Accel is not able to list Accel’s securities on another national securities exchange, Accel expects its securities could be quoted on an over-the-counter market. If this were to occur, Accel could face significant material adverse consequences, including:
•a limited availability of market quotations for the Class A-1 common stock;
•reduced liquidity for Class A-1 common stock;
•a determination that Class A-1 common stock is a “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in Class A-1 common stock to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly result in a reduced level
of trading activity in the secondary trading market for Accel’s securities;
•a limited amount of news and analyst coverage; and
•a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.
The National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996, which is a federal statute, prevents or preempts the states from regulating the sale of certain securities, which are referred to as “covered securities.” The Class A-1 common stock is listed on
the
NYSE, and, as a result, is a covered security. Although the states are preempted from regulating the sale of Accel’s securities, the federal statute does allow the states to investigate companies if there is a suspicion of fraud, and, if there is a finding of fraudulent activity, then the states can regulate or bar the sale of covered securities in a particular case. If Accel were no longer listed on the NYSE, its securities would not be covered securities and Accel would be subject to regulation in each state in which Accel offers its securities.
Accel is an “emerging growth company,” and Accel cannot be certain if the reduced SEC reporting requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make its securities less attractive to investors, which could have a material and adverse effect on Accel, including its growth prospects.
Accel is an “emerging growth company”
as defined in the JOBS Act. Accel will remain an “emerging growth company” until the earliest to occur of (i) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following June 30, 2022, the fifth anniversary of the IPO of Pace, (b) in which Accel has total annual gross revenue of at least $1.0 billion or (c) in which Accel is deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of shares of Class A-1 common stock that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of the prior second fiscal quarter, and (ii) the date on which Accel has issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period. Accel intends to take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to most other public companies, whether or not they are classified as “emerging growth companies,” including, but not limited to, an exemption from the provisions
of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requiring that Accel’s independent registered public accounting firm provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of Accel’s internal control over financial reporting and reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in Accel’s periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. The JOBS Act also provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. Accel has not chosen to “opt out” of this extended transition period, which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, Accel, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the
new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of Accel’s financial statements with another public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used. Accel cannot predict if investors will find its securities less attractive because it intends to rely on certain of these exemptions and benefits under the JOBS Act. If some investors find Accel securities less attractive as a result, there may be a less active, liquid and/or orderly trading market for Accel’s securities and the market price and trading volume of its securities may be more volatile and decline significantly.
Provisions in Accel’s Charter designate the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, to the fullest extent
permitted by law, as the sole and exclusive forum for certain times of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by Accel’s stockholders, and provisions in Accel’s Bylaws also provide that the federal district courts will be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act which could limit the ability of Accel’s stockholders to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with Accel or with its directors, officers or employees and may discourage stockholders from bringing such claims.
The Charter provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, unless Accel consents to the selection of an alternative forum, and subject to the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware having personal jurisdiction over the parties named as defendants therein, the Court of Chancery
of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for:
•any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of Accel;
•any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of Accel’s directors or officers to Accel or its stockholders, creditors or other constituents;
•any action asserting a claim against Accel or any of its directors or officers arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporate Law (“DGCL”), the Charter or the Bylaws (as either may be amended and/or restated from
•any action asserting a claim against Accel that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine.
This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with Accel or any of its directors, officers, or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims. However, stockholders will not be deemed to have waived Accel’s compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder and this provision would not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act, which provides for the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts with respect to all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act
or the rules and regulations thereunder. The Bylaws also provide that the federal district courts of the United States are the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. If a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in the Charter to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, Accel may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm Accel’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
Resales of the securities, or issuances of Class A-1 common stock following the conversion of Class A-2 common stock could depress the market price of Accel’s Class A-1 common stock.
There may be a large number of Accel’s securities sold in the market in the near
future. These sales, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of securities intend to sell securities, could reduce the market price of Accel’s securities. For example, a significant number of shares of Class A-1 common stock held by parties to the registration rights agreement entered into by certain shareholders in connection with the Business Combination have been registered for resale pursuant to an effective registration statement on Form S-3, including shares of Class A-1 common stock issuable upon exchange of shares of Class A-2 common stock. While each registration rights holder (as defined in the registration rights agreement) has agreed not to effect any sale or distribution of its registrable shares if such sale or distribution would, or would reasonably
be expected to, constitute or result in a “change of control” or similar event under Accel or its subsidiaries’ credit facilities, as contractual restrictions on resale end, the sale or possibility of sale of these shares could have the effect of increasing the volatility in the market price of our common stock or decreasing the market price itself.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We own our 58,000 sq. ft. corporate
headquarters in Burr Ridge, Illinois. This facility houses service, support and sales functions for the Chicagoland region. It also houses the executive management team, as well as several other business units and shared services such as legal/compliance, human resources, information technology, security, fleet, finance/accounting, data digital, sales, service, amusements, and marketing and service units. The facility supports Accel’s 24/7 Service Solutions Call Center, as well as onsite route management and collection processing. This facility also contains Accel’s largest warehouse, from which equipment installations, preparation, programming, and repairs occur, as well as gaming terminal quality assurance processes and general storage. In this facility there is an IGB-approved secured storage site for sensitive video gaming equipment and materials.
We also own facilities in Peoria, Springfield, Glen Carbon and Rockford,
all of which are located in Illinois, that support our operations.
We also rent an additional 13 locations in Illinois, three locations in Georgia and one location in Pennsylvania that are used to support our operations and provide warehousing for our equipment.
We believe that our current facilities are in good working order and are capable of supporting our operations for the foreseeable future; however, we will continue to evaluate buying or renting additional space as needed to accommodate our growth.
35
ITEM 3. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
Lawsuits and claims are filed against Accel from time to time in the ordinary course of business, including related to employee matters, employment agreements and non-compete clauses and agreements. Other than settled matters explained as follows, these actions are in various stages, and no judgments or decisions have been rendered. Management, after reviewing matters with legal counsel, believes that the outcome of such matters are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Accel has been involved in a series of related litigated matters stemming from claims that Accel wrongly contracted with 10 different licensed establishments (the “Defendant Establishments”) in 2012 in violation of the contractual rights held by J&J Ventures Gaming, LLC (“J&J”), as further described below.
On
August 21, 2012, one of Accel’s operating subsidiaries entered into certain agreements with Jason Rowell (“Rowell”), a member of Action Gaming LLC (“Action Gaming”), which was an unlicensed terminal operator that had exclusive rights to place and operate gaming terminals within a number of establishments, including the Defendant Establishments. Under agreements with Rowell, Accel agreed to pay him for each licensed establishment which decided to enter into exclusive location agreements with Accel. In late August and early September 2012, each of the Defendant Establishments signed separate location agreements with Accel, purporting to grant it the exclusive right to operate gaming terminals in those establishments. Separately, on August 24, 2012, Action Gaming sold
and assigned its rights to all its location agreements to J&J, including its exclusive rights with the Defendant Establishments (the “J&J Assigned Agreements”). At the time of the assignment of such rights to J&J, the Defendant Establishments were not yet licensed by the IGB.
Action Gaming, J&J, and other parties, collectively, the Plaintiffs, filed a complaint against Accel, Rowell, and other parties in the Circuit Court of Cook County (the “Circuit Court”), on August 31, 2012, as amended on November 1, 2012, December 19, 2012, and October 3, 2013, alleging, among other things, that Accel aided and abetted Rowell in breaches of his fiduciary duties and contractual obligations with Action Gaming and
tortiously interfered with Action Gaming’s contracts with Rowell and agreements assigned to J&J. The complaint seeks damages and injunctive and equitable relief. On January 24, 2018, Accel filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as further described below. On May 14, 2018, the Circuit Court denied Accel’s motion to dismiss and granted a stay to the case, pending a ruling from the IGB on the validity of the J&J Assigned Agreements.
From 2013 to 2015, the Plaintiffs filed additional claims, including J&J Ventures Gaming, LLC et al. v. Wild, Inc. (“Wild”), in various circuit courts seeking declaratory judgements with a number of establishments, including each of the Defendant Establishments,
requesting declarations that, among other things, J&J held the exclusive right to operate VGTs at each of the Defendant Establishments as a result of the J&J Assigned Agreements. Accel was granted leave to intervene in all of the declaratory judgements. The circuit courts found that the J&J Assigned Agreements were valid because each of the underlying location agreements were between an unlicensed establishment and an unlicensed terminal operator, and therefore did not constitute use agreements that were otherwise precluded from assignment under the IGB’s regulations. Upon Accel’s appeal, the Illinois Appellate Court, Fifth District (the “District Court”), vacated the circuit courts’ judgements and dismissed the appeals, holding that the IGB had exclusive jurisdiction over the matter that formed the basis of the parties’ claims, and declined to consider the merits of the parties’ disputes. On September 22,
2016, and after the IGB intervened, the Supreme Court of Illinois issued a judgment inWild, affirming the District Court’s decision vacating the circuit courts’ judgments for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and dismissing the appeals, determining that the IGB has exclusive jurisdiction to decide the validity and enforceability of VGT use agreements.
Between May 2017 and September 2017, both Accel and J&J filed petitions with the IGB seeking adjudication of the rights of the parties and the validity of the use agreements. Those petitions were recently adjudicated by the IGB, largely in Accel’s favor, and J&J has filed a new lawsuit to challenge the IGB’s rulings. Accel does not have a present estimate regarding the
potential damages, if any, that could potentially be awarded in this litigation and, accordingly, have established no reserves relating to such matters. There are also petitions pending with the IGB which could lead to Accel obtaining new locations.
On October 7, 2019, Accel filed a lawsuit in the Circuit Court of Cook County against Jason Rowell and other parties related to Mr. Rowell’s breaches of his non-compete agreement with Accel. Accel alleged that Mr. Rowell and a competitor were working together to interfere with Accel’s customer relationships. That lawsuit, which seeks equitable relief and legal damages, has not yet been served. On November 7, 2019, Mr. Rowell filed a lawsuit in the Circuit Court of Cook County against Accel alleging that he had not
received certain equity interests in Accel to which he was allegedly entitled under his agreement. The parties are engaging in discovery. Accel intends to defend itself against the allegations.
On July 2, 2019, Illinois Gaming Investors, LLC filed a lawsuit against Accel. The lawsuit alleges that a current employee violated his non-competition agreement with Illinois Gaming Investors, LLC, and together with Accel, wrongfully solicited prohibited licensed video gaming locations. The lawsuit on its face seeks damages of $10 million. The parties are engaging in discovery and we are in the process of defending this lawsuit.
On December 18, 2020, we received a disciplinary complaint from the IGB alleging violations of the Video Gaming Act and the IGB’s Adopted Rules for Video Gaming.
The disciplinary complaint seeks to fine us in the amount of $5 million. We filed our initial answer to the IGB’s complaint on January 11, 2021 and have begun the administrative hearing process. We intend to vigorously defend ourself against the allegations in the complaint and deny any allegations of wrongdoing.
Given the status of the legal proceedings discussed above, we have a determined that a legal liability is probable and recorded an estimated loss of $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.
On March 9, 2022, we filed a lawsuit in the Circuit Court of Cook County against Gold Rush relating to the Gold Rush convertible notes. The complaint seeks damages for breach of contract
and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing as well as unjust enrichment. The lawsuit is publicly available.
ITEM 5. MARKET
FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information on Common Stock
Our Class A-1 common stock is trading on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “ACEL” since November 21, 2019. Prior to that time, our Class A-1 common stock was listed under the symbols “TPGH”. On November 21, 2019, we delisted the units offered in our initial public offering, each consisting of one Class A ordinary share and one-third of a warrant, which were listed under the symbol “TPGH.U”, and the units ceased to trade. In August of 2020, our public warrants, which were previously listed under the symbol “ACEL-WS” were delisted from the NYSE.
Stockholders
There
were 98 stockholders of record of our Class A-1 common stock, and 110 stockholders of record of our Class A-2 common stock as of March 7, 2022.
Dividends
We have not paid any cash dividends on our shares to date, nor do we intend to pay cash dividends. The payment of cash dividends in the future will be dependent upon our revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements and general financial condition. The payment of any cash dividends will be within the discretion of the Company Board. Further, if the Company incurs any indebtedness, its ability to declare dividends may be limited by restrictive covenants it may agree to in connection therewith.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The information required by this item with respect to our equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities
On November 22, 2021, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program of
up to $200 million of shares of Class A-1 common stock. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors, including price, general business and market conditions, and alternative investment opportunities. Under the repurchase program, repurchases can be made from time to time using a variety of methods, including open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, in compliance with the rules of the SEC and other applicable legal requirements. The repurchase program does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of shares, and the repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time at the Company’s discretion.
The following table provides the shares purchased under the share repurchase program in the fourth quarter of 2021:
Period
Total number of shares purchased
Average
price paid per share
Cumulative shares purchased as part of publicly announced program
Maximum approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the program (in millions)
October 2021
—
$—
—
$200.0
November
2021
99,778
$12.54
99,778
$198.7
December 2021
601,527
$12.83
701,305
$191.0
Total
701,305
Performance
Graph
The following stock price performance graph should not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Annual Report on Form 10‑K into any filing under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.
The following stock performance graph compares, for the period November 20, 2019 (the day prior to our Class A-1 common stock being traded on the NYSE) through December 31, 2021 (the last trading day of our fiscal year), the cumulative total stockholder return for (1) Accel’s Class A-1 common stock, (2) the NASDAQ Composite Index and (3) Russell 3000
Casinos & Gambling Industry Index assuming a hypothetical $100 investment in our stock or respective index on November 20, 2019.
The stock price performance below is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion provides information that management believes is relevant to an understanding and assessment of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. You should read this discussion in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors, including those set forth under Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”
Company
Overview
We believe Accel is the leading distributed gaming operator in the United States on an Adjusted EBITDA basis, and a preferred partner for local business owners in the Illinois market. Accel’s business consists of the installation, maintenance and operation of gaming terminals, redemption devices that disburse winnings and contain ATM functionality, and other amusement devices which are located in authorized non-casino locations such as restaurants, bars, taverns, convenience stores, liquor stores, truck stops, and grocery stores, which are referred to collectively as “licensed establishments.” Accel also operates a number of stand-alone ATMs in gaming and non-gaming locations. Accel has been licensed by the Illinois Gaming Board since 2012 and holds a license from the PA Board since November 2020. Accel operates 13,639 video gaming terminals across 2,584 locations in the State of Illinois as of December 31,
2021. In July 2020, the Georgia Lottery Corporation approved one of the Company's consolidated subsidiaries as a licensed operator, or a Master Licensee, which allows the Company to begin the installation and operation of coin operated amusement machines for commercial use by the public for play throughout the State of Georgia. On December 30, 2021, one of the Company's consolidated subsidiaries acquired amusement
operations in Iowa and registered with the IDIA to conduct operations in Iowa. The Company is subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations in addition to gaming regulations.
Impact of COVID-19
The COVID-19 outbreak and its related variants are having a significant impact on global markets as a result of government-mandated business closures, supply chain and production disruptions, workforce restrictions, travel restrictions, reduced consumer spending and sentiment, amongst other factors, which are, individually or in the aggregate, negatively affecting the financial performance, liquidity and cash flow projections of many companies in the United States and abroad.
In response to the initial COVID-19 outbreak
in early 2020, the IGB made the decision to shut down all gaming terminals across the State of Illinois starting at 9:00 p.m. on March 16, 2020 and ultimately extended the shutdown through June 30, 2020. As a result, we borrowed $65 million on our delayed draw term loan in March 2020 to increase our cash position and help preserve our financial flexibility. As COVID-19 began a resurgence in the fall of 2020, the virus spread exponentially in every geographical region (currently 11 regions) in the State of Illinois. In response, the IGB suspended all video gaming operations until further notice across the entire state of Illinois starting at 11:01 PM on Thursday, November 19, 2020. Video gaming operations resumed in certain regions of the state beginning on January 16, 2021,
and fully resumed in all regions on January 23, 2021. Even though video gaming operations resumed across all regions, certain regions still had government-imposed restrictions that, among other things, limited hours of operation and restricted the number of patrons allowed within the licensed establishments.
These temporary shutdowns of Illinois video gaming impacted 148 of the 365 gaming days (or 40% of gaming days) during the year ended December 31, 2020 and 18 of the 365 gaming days (or 5% of gaming days) during the year ended December 31, 2021. In light of these events and their effect on our employees and licensed establishment partners, we took action to position the
Company to help mitigate the effects of these temporary cessation of operations. During the initial shutdown in early 2020, the Company furloughed approximately 90% of its employees and deferred certain payments to major vendors. Additionally, members of the Company's senior management decided to voluntarily forgo their base salaries until the resumption of video gaming operations. Beginning in early June 2020, the Company started reinstating employees from furlough in anticipation of
40
resuming operations
on July 1, 2020. During the second shutdown between late 2020 and early 2021, the Company furloughed idle staff as appropriate and deferred certain payments to major vendors.
As a result of these developments, our 2020 revenues, results of operations and cash flows were materially affected. The COVID-19 situation is rapidly changing as new variant strains continue to pose a threat to public health and additional impacts to the business and financial results may arise that we are not aware of currently.
In close consultation with the Illinois Department of Public Health and the governor, the IGB issued protocols to guide casino and terminal operators in keeping players safe. Based on those protocols, we worked with our licensed establishment partners
to, among other things:
•Follow social distancing requirements within the gaming area by moving the gaming equipment or installing spacers that meet IGB guidelines;
•determine how personal protective equipment usage requirements will be observed and enforced;
•develop procedures and schedules for cleaning, disinfecting and sanitizing the establishment as well the gaming area, including the gaming terminals; and
•proper signage to remind patrons of social distancing requirements, proper hand washing, use of sanitizers, use of personal protective equipment, and to stay at home if feeling sick.
Accel supported these measures to protect the safety of our
employees and fellow Illinois citizens, as the health and safety of players and licensed partner establishments is of paramount importance to us. We were in constant contact with our licensed partner establishments to keep them aware of current developments and worked with them through these difficult times.
We incurred non-recurring, one-time expenses of $1.2 million ($2.5 million of costs less recoveries under the CARES Act of $1.3 million) for the year ended December 31, 2020 for costs to provide benefits (e.g. employee portion of health insurance premiums) for furloughed employees during the IGB-mandated COVID-19 shutdown. These costs are included within other expenses, net. The Company also spent $2.0 million in capital costs for the year
ended December 31, 2020 related to the purchase of IGB-mandated spacers for its gaming terminals to promote social distancing requirements within the gaming area and incurred operating expenses of $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 related to cleaning, disinfecting and sanitizing supplies.
While the IGB has announced the resumption of all video gaming activities in January 2021, it is possible that it or the State of Illinois may order a shutdown by region, or a complete suspension of video gaming in the state, or institute stay-at-home, closure or other similar orders or measures in the future in response to a resurgence of COVID-19 and its related variants or other events. Under the guidelines provided by the IL Department of Health and Governor’s office, the IGB has been closely monitoring Illinois' COVID-19
related statistics including the positivity rate, hospital admissions, and hospital bed availability in each region. We will continue to monitor the situation and its potential impact on our operations.
Components of Performance
Revenues
Net gaming. Net gaming revenue represents net cash received from gaming activities, which is the difference between gaming wins and losses. Net gaming revenue includes the amounts earned by the licensed establishments and is recognized at the time of gaming play.
Amusement. Amusement revenue represents amounts collected from amusement devices operated at various licensed establishments and is recognized
at the point the amusement device is used.
ATM fees and other revenue. ATM fees and other revenue represents fees charged for the withdrawal of funds from Accel’s redemption devices and stand-alone ATMs and is recognized at the time of the ATM transaction.
Cost of revenue. Cost of revenue consists of (i) a 34% tax on net gaming revenue (such tax increased from 30% beginning on July 1, 2019 and from 33% beginning on July
1, 2020) that is payable to the IGB, (ii) an administrative fee (0.8513% currently) payable to Scientific Games International, the third-party contracted by IGB to maintain the central system to which all gaming terminals across Illinois are connected, (iii) establishment revenue share, which is defined as 50% of gross gaming revenue after subtracting the tax and administrative fee, (iv) ATM and amusement commissions payable to locations, (v) ATM and amusement fees, and (vi) licenses and permits required for the operation of gaming terminals and other equipment.
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses consist of operating expense and general and administrative (“G&A”) expense. Operating expense includes payroll and related expense for service technicians, route technicians, route security, and preventative maintenance personnel.
Operating expense also includes vehicle fuel and maintenance, and non-capitalizable parts expenses. Operating expenses are generally proportionate to the number of licensed establishments and gaming terminals. G&A expense includes payroll and related expense for account managers, business development managers, marketing, and other corporate personnel. In addition, G&A expense also includes marketing, information technology, insurance, rent and professional fees.
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the individual assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life or the lease.
Amortization of route and customer acquisition costs and location contracts
acquired. Route and customer acquisition costs consist of fees paid at the inception of contracts entered into with third parties and licensed video gaming establishments, which allow Accel to install and operate gaming terminals. The route and customer acquisition costs and route and customer acquisition costs payable are recorded at the net present value of the future payments using a discount rate equal to Accel’s incremental borrowing rate associated with its long-term debt. Route and customer acquisition costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over 18 years, which is the expected estimated life of the contract, including expected renewals. The amortization period begins on the date the location commences operations.
Location
contracts acquired in a business combination are recorded at fair value and then amortized as an intangible asset on a straight-line basis over the expected useful life of 15 years.
Interest expense, net
Interest expense, net consists of interest on Accel’s current and prior credit facilities, amortization of financing fees, and accretion of interest on route and customer acquisition costs payable. Interest on the current credit facility is payable monthly on unpaid balances at the variable per annum LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin, as defined under the terms of the credit facility, ranging from 1.75% to 2.75% depending on the first lien net leverage ratio. Interest on our prior credit facility was payable monthly on unpaid balances at the variable per annum LIBOR rate plus an applicable
margin, as defined under the terms of the prior credit facility, ranging from 1.70% to 2.50% depending on the ratio of total net debt to EBITDA. Interest expense, net also consists of interest income on convertible notes from another terminal operator that bear interest at 3% per annum.
Income tax expense (benefit)
Income tax expense (benefit) consists mainly of taxes payable (receivable) to national, state and local authorities. Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of the assets and liabilities.
The following table summarizes Accel’s results of operations on a consolidated basis for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:
(in thousands, except %'s)
Year
Ended December 31,
Increase / Decrease
2021
2020
Change
Change %
Revenues:
Net gaming
$
705,784
$
300,520
$
405,264
134.9
%
Amusement
16,667
9,247
7,420
80.2
%
ATM
fees and other revenue
12,256
6,585
5,671
86.1
%
Total net revenues
734,707
316,352
418,355
132.2
%
Operating
expenses:
Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense shown below)
494,032
211,086
282,946
134.0
%
General and administrative
110,818
77,420
33,398
43.1
%
Depreciation
and amortization of property and equipment
24,636
20,969
3,667
17.5
%
Amortization of route and customer acquisition costs and location contracts acquired
22,040
22,608
(568)
(2.5)
%
Other
expenses, net
12,989
8,948
4,041
45.2
%
Total operating expenses
664,515
341,031
323,484
94.9
%
Operating
income (loss)
70,192
(24,679)
94,871
(384.4)
%
Interest expense, net
12,702
13,707
(1,005)
(7.3)
%
Loss
(gain) on change in fair value of contingent earnout shares
9,762
(8,484)
18,246
(215.1)
%
Gain on change in fair value of warrants
—
(12,574)
12,574
(100.0)
%
Loss
on debt extinguishment
1,152
—
1,152
(100.0)
%
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
46,576
(17,328)
63,904
(368.8)
%
Income
tax expense (benefit)
15,017
(16,918)
31,935
(188.8)
%
Net income (loss)
$
31,559
$
(410)
$
31,969
7,797.3
%
Revenues
Total
net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2021 were $734.7 million, an increase of $418.4 million, or 132.2%, compared to the prior year. The increase was driven by an increase in net gaming revenue of $405.3 million, or 134.9%, an increase in amusement revenue of $7.4 million, or 80.2%, and an increase in ATM fees and other revenue of $5.7 million, or 86.1%. The increase in net revenues was primarily attributable to the IGB mandated temporary shutdowns of Illinois gaming due to the COVID-19 outbreak which impacted 148 of the 365 gaming days (or 40% of gaming days) during the year ended December 31, 2020 and 18 of the 365 gaming days (or 5% of gaming days) during the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase in net gaming
revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021, also reflected an increase in gaming terminals and locations, as well as an increase in location hold-per-day, which was driven by higher bet limit software and the addition of a 6th VGT.
Cost of revenue
Total cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $494.0 million, an increase of $282.9 million, or 134.0%, compared to the prior year due primarily to the previously mentioned IGB-mandated temporary shutdowns of Illinois video gaming due to the COVID-19 outbreak and an increase in the Illinois gaming tax from 33% to 34% on July 1, 2020.
Total general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2021 were $110.8 million, an increase of $33.4 million, or 43.1%, compared to the prior year. The increase was attributable to a reduction in our prior-year monthly expenses during the previously mentioned IGB-mandated shutdown. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2021 also reflected higher payroll-related costs as we continued to grow our operations and higher professional fees.
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment for
the year ended December 31, 2021 was $24.6 million, an increase of $3.7 million, or 17.5%, compared to the prior year, primarily due to an increased number of licensed establishments and gaming terminals. In the fourth quarter of 2021, we extended the useful lives of our gaming terminals and equipment from 10 years to 13 years. The impact of this change in estimate was a decrease in depreciation expense of $1.2 million for both the fourth quarter and the year ended December 31, 2021.
Amortization of route and customer acquisition costs and location contracts acquired
Amortization of route and customer acquisition costs and location contracts
acquired for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $22.0 million, a decrease of $0.6 million, or 2.5%, compared to the prior year. In the fourth quarter of 2021, we extended the useful lives of our route and customer acquisition costs from 12.4 years to 18 years and location contracts acquired from 10 to 15 years. The impact of these changes in estimate was a decrease in amortization expense of $2.7 million for both the fourth quarter and the year ended December 31, 2021. Partially offsetting this decrease was an increase in business and asset acquisitions.
Other expenses, net
Other expenses, net for the year ended December 31,
2021 were $13.0 million, an increase of $4.0 million, or 45.2%, compared to the prior-year period. The increase was due to larger fair value adjustments associated with the revaluation of contingent consideration liabilities due to stronger than anticipated performance from the associated business acquisitions and higher costs associated with new market development, partially offset by lower non-recurring, one-time expenses attributable to non-capitalizable public offering costs incurred in the first quarter of 2020 and cost incurred in the second quarter of 2020 totaling $1.2 million ($2.5 million of costs less recoveries under the CARES Act of $1.3 million) for costs to provide benefits (e.g. employee portion of health insurance premiums) for furloughed employees during the IGB-mandated COVID-19 shutdown.
Interest expense, net
Interest
expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $12.7 million, a decrease of $1.0 million, or 7.3%, compared to the prior year primarily due to a decrease in average borrowings and lower average interest rates. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the weighted-average interest rate was approximately 3.2% compared to the weighted-average interest rate of approximately 3.3% for the prior year.
Loss (gain) on change in fair value of contingent earnout shares
Loss on change in fair value of contingent earnout shares for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $9.8 million, a decrease of $18.2 million, or 215.1%, compared to the prior year
which had a gain of $8.5 million. The decrease was primarily due to the change in the market value of our Class A-1 common stock, which is the primary input to the valuation of the contingent earnout shares.
Gain on change in fair value of warrants
Gain on change in fair value of warrants for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $12.6 million. The gain was primarily due to the change in the market value of our public warrants which was the primary input to the valuation of the warrants. In the third quarter of 2020, we redeemed substantially all of the warrants which resulted in no change to the fair value of the remaining warrants for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Loss on debt extinguishment was $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 and was recorded in connection with the entry into Amendment No.2 of our Credit Facility in October 2021. For more information on Amendment No. 2 of our Credit Facility, see the discussion within the Liquidity and Capital Resources later in this section.
Income tax expense (benefit)
Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $15.0 million, an increase of $31.9 million, or 188.8%, compared to an income tax benefit of $16.9 million in the prior year. Income
tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2021 was impacted by the change in fair value of the contingent earnout shares that are not deductible for tax purposes. In addition to our net loss, the income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2020 was impacted by a benefit of $8 million from a change in estimate that resulted in favorable return-to-provision adjustments during the preparation of our 2019 federal and state income tax returns.
For the discussion of Accel’s results of operations on a consolidated basis for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 please see our 2020 Form 10-K/A that was filed on May 10, 2021.
Key
Business Metrics
Accel uses a variety of statistical data and comparative information commonly used in the gaming industry to monitor the performance of the business, none of which are prepared in accordance with GAAP, and therefore should not be viewed as indicators of operational performance. Accel’s management uses this information for financial planning, strategic planning and employee compensation decisions. The key indicators include:
The number of licensed establishments is calculated based on data provided by Scientific Games, a contractor of the IGB. Terminal operator portal data is updated at the end of each gaming day and includes licensed establishments that may be temporarily closed but still connected to the central system. Accel utilizes this metric to continually monitor growth from organic openings, purchased licensed establishments, and competitor conversions. Competitor conversions occur when a licensed establishment chooses to change terminal operators.
Number of video game terminals (VGTs)
The number of VGTs in operation is based on Scientific Games terminal operator portal data which is updated at the end of each gaming day and includes VGTs that may be temporarily shut off but still connected to the central system. Accel
utilizes this metric to continually monitor growth from existing licensed establishments, organic openings, purchased licensed establishments, and competitor conversions.
Average remaining contract term is calculated by determining the average expiration date of all outstanding contracts with Accel’s current licensed establishment partners, and then subtracting the applicable measurement date. The IGB limited the length of contracts entered into after February
2, 2018 to a maximum of eight years and prohibits automatic renewals.
Location hold-per-day is calculated by dividing the difference between cash deposited in all VGTs at each licensed establishment and tickets issued to players at each licensed establishment by the number of locations in operation each day during the period being measured. Then divide the calculated amount by the number of operating days in such period.
The following tables set forth information with respect to Accel’s Illinois licensed
establishments, number of VGTs, average remaining contract term and location hold-per-day as of and for the years ended December 31.
(1)
Location hold-per day for the year ended December 31, 2021 is computed based on 347 eligible gaming days (excludes 18 non-gaming days due to the IGB mandated COVID-19 shutdown). Location hold-per day for the year ended December 31, 2020 is computed based on 217 eligible gaming days (excludes 148 non-gaming days due to the IGB mandated COVID-19 shutdown).
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income are non-GAAP financial measures and are key metrics used to monitor ongoing core operations. Management believes Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income
enhance the understanding of Accel’s underlying drivers of profitability and trends in Accel’s business and facilitate company-to-company and period-to-period comparisons, because these non-GAAP financial measures exclude the effects of certain non-cash items or represent certain nonrecurring items that are unrelated to core performance. Management also believes that these non-GAAP financial measures are used by investors, analysts and other interested parties as measures of financial performance and to evaluate Accel’s ability to fund capital expenditures, service debt obligations and meet working capital requirements.
Amortization of route and customer acquisition costs and location contracts acquired(1)
22,040
22,608
17,975
Stock-based
compensation(2)
6,403
5,538
2,236
Loss (gain) on change in fair value of contingent earnout shares(3)
9,762
(8,484)
9,837
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of warrants(4)
—
(12,574)
21,063
Other
expenses, net(5)
12,989
8,948
19,649
Tax effect of adjustments(6)
(11,346)
(9,850)
(11,301)
Adjusted net income
$
71,407
$
5,776
$
22,695
Depreciation
and amortization of property and equipment
24,636
20,969
26,398
Interest expense, net
12,702
13,707
12,860
Emerging markets(7)
3,403
517
—
Income
tax expense (benefit)
26,363
(7,068)
16,500
Loss on debt extinguishment
1,152
—
1,141
Adjusted EBITDA
$
139,663
$
33,901
$
79,594
(1) Amortization
of route and customer acquisition costs and location contracts acquired consist of upfront cash payments and future cash payments to third-party sales agents to acquire the licensed video gaming establishments that are not connected with a business combination. Accel amortizes the upfront cash payment over the life of the contract, including expected renewals, beginning on the date the location goes live, and recognizes non-cash amortization charges with respect to such items. Future or deferred cash payments, which may occur based on terms of the underlying contract, are generally lower in the aggregate as compared to established practice of providing higher upfront payments, and are also capitalized
and amortized over the remaining life of the contract. Future cash payments do not include cash costs associated with renewing customer contracts as Accel does not generally incur significant costs as a result of extension or renewal of an existing contract. Location contracts acquired in a business combination are recorded at fair value as part of the business combination accounting and then amortized as an intangible asset on a straight-line basis over the expected useful life of the contract of 15 years. “Amortization
of route and customer acquisition costs and location contracts acquired” aggregates the non-cash amortization charges relating to upfront route and customer acquisition cost payments and location contracts acquired.
(2) Stock-based compensation consists of options, restricted stock units and warrants.
(3) Loss (gain) on change in fair value of contingent earnout shares represents a non-cash fair value adjustment at each reporting period end related to the value of these contingent shares. Upon achieving such contingency, shares of Class A-2 common stock convert to Class A-1 common stock resulting in a non-cash settlement of the obligation.
(4) (Gain)
loss on change in fair value of warrants represents a non-cash fair value adjustment at each reporting period end related to the value of these warrants.
(5) Other expenses, net consists of (i) non-cash expenses including the remeasurement of contingent consideration liabilities, (ii) non-recurring expenses relating to lobbying efforts and legal expenses in Pennsylvania and lobbying efforts in Missouri, (iii) non-recurring costs associated with COVID-19 and (iv) other non-recurring expenses.
(6) Calculated by excluding the impact of the non-GAAP adjustments from the current period tax provision calculations.
(7) Emerging markets consist of the results, on an Adjusted EBITDA basis, for non-core jurisdictions where our operations are developing. Markets are no longer considered emerging when Accel has installed or acquired at
least 500 gaming terminals in the jurisdiction, or when 24 months have elapsed from the date Accel first installs or acquires gaming terminals in the jurisdiction, whichever occurs first.
Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $139.7 million, an increase of $105.8 million, or 312.0%, compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to the impact of the previously mentioned temporary shutdowns of gaming in the state of Illinois due to the COVID-19 outbreak that impacted 148 of the 365 gaming days (or 40% of gaming days) during the year ended December 31, 2020 when compared to 18 of the 365 gaming days (or 5% of gaming days) during the
year ended December 31, 2021. The increase in performance for the year ended December 31, 2021 was also attributable to an increase in the number of licensed establishments, VGTs, and location hold-per-day.
In order to maintain sufficient liquidity, we review our cash flow projections
and available funds with our Board of Directors to consider modifying our capital structure and seeking additional sources of liquidity, if needed. The availability of additional liquidity options will depend on the economic and financial environment, our creditworthiness, our historical and projected financial and operating performance, and our continued compliance with financial covenants. As a result of possible future economic, financial and operating declines, possible declines in our creditworthiness and potential non-compliance with financial covenants, we may have less liquidity than anticipated, fewer sources of liquidity than anticipated, less attractive financing terms and less flexibility in determining when and how to use the liquidity that is available.
We believe that our cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operations and borrowing availability under our senior secured credit facility will be sufficient
to meet our capital requirements for the next twelve months. Our primary short-term cash needs are paying operating expenses and higher contingent earnout payments, servicing outstanding indebtedness, and funding our Board approved share repurchase program and near term acquisitions. As of December 31, 2021, Accel had $198.8 million in cash and cash equivalents.
In response to the decision by the IGB in early 2020 to temporarily suspend all video gaming across the State of Illinois due to the COVID-19 outbreak, we borrowed $65 million on our delayed draw term loan in March 2020 to increase our cash position and help preserve our financial flexibility.
Senior Secured Credit Facility
On November 13, 2019, in order to refinance our prior credit
facility, for working capital and other general purposes, we entered into a credit agreement (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”) as borrower, Accel and our wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries, as a guarantor, the banks, financial institutions and other lending institutions from time to time party thereto, as lenders, the other parties from time to time party thereto and Capital One, National Association, as administrative agent (in such capacity, the “Agent”), collateral agent, issuing bank and swingline lender, providing for a:
•$100.0 million revolving credit facility, including a letter of credit facility with a $10.0 million sublimit and a swing line facility with a $10.0 million sublimit,
•$240.0 million initial term loan
facility and
•$125.0 million additional term loan facility.
The additional term loan facility was available for borrowings until November 13, 2020. Each of the revolving loans and the term loans were scheduled to mature on November 13, 2024.
Given the uncertainty of COVID-19 and the resulting potential impact to the gaming industry and our future assumptions, as well as to provide additional financial flexibility, we and the other parties thereto amended the Credit Agreement on August 4, 2020 to provide a waiver of financial covenant breach for the periods ended September 30, 2020 through March
31, 2021 of the First Lien Net Leverage Ratio and Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (each as defined under the Credit Agreement). The amendment also raised the floor for the adjusted LIBOR rate to 0.50% and the floor for the Base Rate to 1.50%. We incurred costs of $0.4 million associated with the amendment of the Credit Agreement, of which $0.3 million was capitalized and will be amortized over the remaining life of the facility. The waivers of financial covenant breach were never utilized as we remained in compliance with all debt covenants during these periods.
On October 22, 2021, in order to increase the borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement, we and the other parties thereto entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Credit Agreement (“Amendment No. 2”). Amendment No. 2, among other things, provides for:
•an increase in the amount of the revolving credit facility from $100.0 million to $150.0 million,
•$350.0 million initial term loan facility, the proceeds of which were applied to refinancing existing indebtedness, and
•$400.0 million delayed draw term loan facility.
The maturity date of the Credit Agreement was extended to October 22, 2026. The interest rate and covenants remained unchanged. The Company incurred $4.3 million in debt issuance costs associated with Amendment No. 2. The
Company also recognized a loss on debt extinguishment of $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 in connection with the amendment.
As of December 31, 2021, there remained approximately $550.0 million of availability under the Credit Agreement.
The obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by us and our wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions (collectively, the “Guarantors”). The obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Guarantors, subject to certain exceptions. Certain future-formed or acquired wholly owned domestic subsidiaries
will also be required to guarantee the Credit Agreement and grant a security interest in substantially all of its assets (subject to certain exceptions) to secure the obligations under the Credit Agreement.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest, at our option, at a rate per annum equal to either (a) the adjusted LIBOR rate (“LIBOR”) (which cannot be less than zero) for interest periods of 1, 2, 3 or 6 months (or if consented to by (i) each applicable Lender, 12 months or any period shorter than 1 month or (ii) the Agent, a shorter period necessary to ensure that the end of the relevant interest period would coincide with any required amortization payment ) plus the applicable LIBOR margin or (b) the alternative base rate (“ABR”) plus the applicable ABR margin. ABR is a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the highest of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 1/2 of 1.0%, (ii) the prime rate announced
from time to time by Capital One, National Association and (iii) LIBOR for a 1-month Interest Period on such day plus 1.0%. The Credit Agreement also includes provisions for determining a replacement rate when LIBOR is no longer available. As of December 31, 2021, the weighted-average interest rate was approximately 3.2%.
Interest is payable quarterly in arrears for ABR loans, at the end of the applicable interest period for LIBOR loans (but not less frequently than quarterly) and upon the prepayment or maturity of the underlying loans. We are required to pay a commitment fee quarterly in arrears in respect of unused commitments under the revolving credit facility and the additional term loan facility.
The applicable LIBOR and ABR margins and the commitment fee rate are calculated based upon the first lien net leverage ratio of Accel
and its restricted subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, as defined in the Credit Agreement. The revolving loans and term loans bear interest, at either (a) ABR (150bps floor) plus a margin of 1.75% or (b) LIBOR (50bps floor) plus a margin of 2.75% at our option.
The term loans and, once drawn, the additional term loans will amortize at an annual rate equal to approximately 5.00% per annum. Upon the consummation of certain non-ordinary course asset sales, we may be required to apply the net cash proceeds thereof to prepay outstanding term loans and additional term loans. The loans under the Credit Agreement may be prepaid without premium or penalty, subject to customary LIBOR “breakage” costs.
The Credit Agreement contains certain customary affirmative and negative covenants and events
of default and requires Accel and certain of its affiliates obligated under the Credit Agreement to make customary representations and warranties in connection with credit extensions thereunder.
In addition, the Credit Agreement requires Accel to maintain (a) a ratio of consolidated first lien net debt to consolidated EBITDA no greater than 4.50 to 1.00 and (b) a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated fixed charges no less than 1.20 to 1.00, in each case, tested as of the last day of each full fiscal quarter ending after the Closing Date and determined on the basis of the four most recently ended fiscal quarters of Accel for which financial statements have been delivered pursuant to the Credit Agreement, subject to customary “equity cure” rights.
If an event of default (as such term is defined in the Credit Agreement) occurs, the lenders would be entitled to take various actions, including the acceleration of amounts due under the Credit Agreement, termination of the lenders’ commitments thereunder, foreclosure on collateral, and all other remedial actions available to a secured creditor. The failure to pay certain amounts owing under the Credit Agreement may result in an increase in the interest rate applicable thereto.
We were in compliance with all debt covenants as of December 31, 2021. Given our assumptions about the future impact of COVID-19 and its variants on the gaming industry, which could be materially different due to the inherent uncertainties of future restrictions on the industry, we expect to remain in compliance
with all debt covenants for the next 12 months.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes Accel’s net cash provided by or used in operating activities, investing activities and financing activities for the periods indicated and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
110,755
$
(3,705)
$
45,565
Net
cash used in investing activities
(34,544)
(61,435)
(151,532)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(11,876)
74,188
139,141
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
For the year ended December 31,
2021, net cash provided by operating activities was $110.8 million, an increase of $114.5 million over the prior year. In addition to our increase in net income, we had a $6.1 million increase attributable to the impact of deferred income taxes.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, net cash used in operating activities was $3.7 million, a decrease of $49.3 million over the prior year. In addition to our decrease in net income, we had a $16.8 million decrease attributable to the impact of deferred income taxes and $1.8 million in payments on contingent consideration.
Net cash used in investing activities
For the year ended December 31, 2021,
net cash used in investing activities was $34.5 million, a decrease of $26.9 million over the prior year and was primarily attributable to less cash used for business and asset acquisitions, partially offset by higher purchases of property and equipment. We anticipate our capital expenditures will be approximately $20-25 million in 2022.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, net cash used in investing activities was $61.4 million, a decrease of $90.1 million over the prior year and was primarily attributable to less cash used for business and asset acquisitions, partially offset by higher purchases of property and equipment. We also invested $30.0 million in convertible notes in 2019.
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
For
the year ended December 31, 2021, net cash used in financing activities was $11.9 million, a decrease of $86.1 million over the prior year. The decrease reflects repurchases of our Class A-1 common stock of $9.0 million under our share repurchase program, partially offset by an increase in net borrowings on our Credit Facility and lower payments on consideration payable. The prior-year period also included $90.4 million of net proceeds from the issuance of Class A-1 common stock.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, net cash provided by financing activities was $74.2 million, a decrease of $65.0 million over the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in net borrowings on Accel’s Credit Facility, lower proceeds from the exercise of stock
options and warrants, and higher payments on consideration payable, partially offset by proceeds received from issuing Class A-1 common stock and lower debt issuance costs.
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In applying accounting principles, it is often required to use estimates. These estimates consider the facts, circumstances and information
available, and may be based on subjective inputs, assumptions and information known and unknown to us. Material changes in certain of the estimates that we use could affect, by a material amount, our consolidated financial position and results of operations. Although results may vary, we believe our estimates are reasonable and appropriate. The following describes certain significant accounting policies that involve more subjective and complex judgments where the effect on our consolidated financial position and operating performance could be material.
Revenue recognition
Accel generates revenues in the State of Illinois from the following types of services: gaming terminals, amusements and ATMs. Revenue is disaggregated by type of revenue and is presented on the face of the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). Net gaming
revenue is the win from gaming activities, which is the difference between gaming wins and losses. Amusement revenue represents amounts collected from machines operated at various licensed establishments. ATM fees and other revenue represents fees charged for the withdrawal of funds from Accel’s redemption devices and stand-alone ATMs.
Accel determined that in a gaming environment, whenever a customer’s money has been accepted by a machine, we have an obligation (an implied contract) to provide the customer access to the game and honor the outcome of the game (in the case of video gaming terminals). Accel determined that the implied contract is entered into between us and customers satisfies the requirements of a contract
under Topic 606, as (i) the contract is legally enforceable with the customer, (ii) the arrangement identifies the rights of the parties, (iii) the contract has commercial substance, and (iv) the cash is received upfront from the customer so its collectability is probable. The gaming service is a single performance obligation in each implied contract with the customer. Accel applies the portfolio approach of all wins and losses by VGT daily to determine the total transaction price of the portfolio of implied contracts. Accel recognizes revenue when the single performance obligation is satisfied, which is
at the completion of each game.
Route and customer acquisition costs
Accel’s route and customer acquisition costs consist of fees paid, typically an upfront payment and future installment payments over the life of the contract, entered into with third parties and licensed establishments throughout the State of Illinois. These contracts are non-cancelable and allow Accel to install and operate VGTs in various establishments throughout the State of Illinois. The upfront payment and future installment payments are recorded at the net present value using a discount rate equal to Accel’s incremental borrowing costs. Route acquisition costs are amortized on a straight-line basis beginning on the date the
location goes live and amortized over the life of the contract, which includes expected renewals. Accel records the accretion of interest on the route installment payments in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income(loss) as a component of interest expense, net. For locations that close prior to the end of the contractual term, Accel writes-off the net book value of the route and the related installment payables not yet paid and records a gain or loss in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income(loss) as a component of general and administrative expense. Additionally, most of the route acquisition
contracts allow Accel to clawback some upfront and installment payments over the first few years of a contract if the location is unable to secure the appropriate licensing or it goes out of business prior to the end of the contract term. In the instances where a claw-back is triggered and Accel assesses it as recoverable, a receivable will be recorded. Upfront payments with a claw-back prior to a location going live are capitalized and will not begin amortization until the respective licensed establishment commences operations.
Consideration payable
Consideration payable consists of amounts payable related
to certain business acquisitions as well as contingent consideration for future licensed establishment performance related to certain business acquisitions. The contingent consideration is measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Accel uses a discounted cash flow analysis to determine the value of
contingent consideration upon acquisition and updates this estimate on a recurring basis. The significant assumptions in the cash flow analysis include the probability adjusted projected revenues after state taxes, a discount rate as applicable to each acquisition, and the estimated number of licensed establishments at which Accel commences operations during
the contingent consideration period. The changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are recognized within Accel’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) as other expenses, net.
Business combinations and goodwill
For acquisitions meeting the definition of a business combination, the acquisition method of accounting is used. The acquisition date is the date on which Accel obtains operating control over the acquired business. The consideration paid is determined on the acquisition date and is the sum of the fair values of the assets acquired by Accel and the liabilities assumed by Accel, including the fair value of any asset or liability resulting from a deferred consideration arrangement. Acquisition-related costs, such as professional fees, are excluded from the consideration transferred and
are expensed as incurred. Any contingent consideration is measured at its fair value on the acquisition date, recorded as a liability and accreted over its payment term in Accel’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income(loss) as other expenses, net. Goodwill is measured as the excess of the consideration transferred over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The relevance of this policy varies form period to period depending on the volume of applicable acquisitions occurring.
Convertible notes
At acquisition, an entity shall classify debt securities as trading, available-for-sale, or held-to-maturity. While we have no intention of selling the convertible notes we hold, we cannot classify them as held-to-maturity due to
the conversion feature. Therefore, we have classified our investment in convertible notes as available for sale and they are recorded at their fair market value. We previously engaged a third-party firm to assist us in determining the fair value of our investment in the convertible notes. The third-party firm utilized a binomial lattice model in which a convertible instrument is split into two separate components: a cash-only (debt) component and an equity component. The binomial lattice trees are constructed using a methodology that assigns up and downward movement factors and probabilities based on rates of return, volatility, and time. It allows for the optional conversion features of the convertible notes to be captured by determining whether conversion or continuing to hold is the most economically advantageous to the holder. Upon conversion, future values in the equity component are subject to only the risk-free rate, while the cash-only component associated with
continuing to hold the debt instrument is subject to the selected risk-adjusted discount rate. Solving backwards through the trees associated with the equity component and the trees associated with the debt component yields an aggregate discounted value for each. The sum of these values yields the indicated fair value of the convertible notes. The discount rate is the risk-adjusted discount rate that is implied by the rate that allows the discounted cash flows with all terms and conditions modeled to equal the total cash consideration. As such, after modeling the features of convertible notes as of the issuance date using the lattice model framework outlined above, we solved for the discount rate that resulted in a value for the note equal to the total cash consideration. This valuation of our investment in convertible notes utilized significant inputs that are unobservable and require significant judgment or estimation. Changes in these inputs or other underlying assumptions
could have a significant impact on the fair value of the convertible notes.
On July 30, 2021, we provided notice to the issuer of the convertible notes, Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. ("Gold Rush"), another terminal operator, that we were exercising our rights to convert the notes into common stock of Gold Rush, subject to approval from the IGB to transfer the common stock to us. Accordingly, beginning in the third quarter of 2021, given the pending request for regulatory approval on the transfer of equity interest, the fair value of the convertible notes was estimated using a probability-weighted approach. Assuming regulatory approval was received, the fair value of the convertible notes was estimated on an as-converted basis by multiplying the equity value of Gold Rush by the ownership percentage as calculated pursuant to the terms of the convertible note agreements.
In the scenario where regulatory approval was not received, the fair value of the convertible notes was estimated using a discounted cash flow approach assuming we would request immediate redemption of the principal and accrued interest and the discount rate was estimated based on comparable public debt rates. This assumption did not consider legal claims we may have under the convertible notes to receive the economic value of the conversion shares, even if transfer of the actual ownership interest in Gold Rush to us was not approved by the IGB. After the IGB Administrator’s denial of the transfer of the equity interest on December 2, 2021, we concluded that the fair value of the
convertible notes should be calculated as principal plus accrued interest as of December 31, 2021. For the avoidance of doubt, the recorded value of $32 million is less than what we maintain as the amount we are legally entitled to under the Gold Rush convertible notes, but is consistent with the accounting for gain contingencies. This valuation of our investment in convertible notes utilized significant inputs that are unobservable and require significant judgment or estimation. Changes in in these inputs or other underlying assumptions could cause the fair value of the convertible notes to be materially higher or lower. For more information regarding our investment in the convertible notes, see Notes 4, 13 and 22 to our consolidated financial statements included herein.
Contingent earnout shares liability
Our
Class A-2 common stock is classified as a contingent earnout shares liability due to the fact that the conversion of the Class A-2 common stock would be accelerated on a change of control regardless of the transaction value. The liability is stated at fair value and any change in the fair value is recognized as a gain or loss in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). We determine the fair value of the contingent earnout shares based on the market price of our Class A-1 common stock. The liability, by tranche, is then stated at present value based on i.) an interest rate derived from our borrowing rate and the applicable risk-free rate and ii.) an estimate on when we expect the contingent earnout shares to convert to Class A-1 common stock. Changes
in in these inputs or other underlying assumptions could have a significant impact on the fair value of the contingent earnout shares liability.
Warrant liability
Certain provisions preclude the warrants from being accounted for as components of stockholders’ equity (deficit), including certain settlement provisions that differ based on the holder. As a result, the warrants are recorded as liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The warrants were measured at fair value at inception and at each reporting date in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, with the changes in fair value recognized in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) in the period of change. We determined the fair value of our public warrants based
on their trading price (ticker symbol ACEL.WS) on the NYSE. We initially determined the fair value of our private placement warrants by using the fair value of our public warrants and a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires inputs such as the fair value of our common stock, the risk-free interest rate, expected term, expected dividend yield and expected volatility. Changes in these inputs or other underlying assumptions could have had a significant impact on the fair value of the warrant liability. Beginning in the second quarter of 2020, the valuation of our private placement warrants was based on the trading price of our Class A-1 common stock divided by four as the holders of our outstanding warrants were to receive 0.25 shares of Class A-1 common stock
in exchange for each warrant tendered in an exchange offer we consummated in August 2020. The estimates used in the valuation of the warrants were critical for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2020 due to the number of warrants outstanding in those periods. After substantially all of the warrants were validly tendered in the exchange offer in the third quarter of 2020, the estimates used in the periodic valuation of the warrants were no longer considered critical.
Changes in estimate
During the fourth quarter of 2021, we conducted a review of our estimate of depreciable lives for our video gaming terminals and equipment. As a result of this review, we extended the useful lives of our gaming terminals and equipment from 10 years to 13 years as the equipment is lasting longer
than originally estimated. Most of our gaming terminals and equipment that were purchased when the Company started operations that are still being used today.
Also during the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company conducted a review of its estimate of the amortization periods for its route and customer acquisition costs and its location contracts. As a result of this review, the Company extended the amortization period of its route and customer acquisition costs from 12.4 years to 18 years and its location contracts
from 10 years to 15 years.
The impact of these changes in estimate for both the fourth quarter and the year ended December 31, 2021, was a net decrease to depreciation expense of $1.2 million and a $2.7 million decrease to amortization expense of route and customer acquisition costs and location contracts acquired.
Accel’s
results of operations can fluctuate due to seasonal trends and other factors. For example, the gross revenue per machine per day is typically lower in the summer when players will typically spend less time indoors at licensed establishments, and higher in cold weather between February and April, when players will typically spend more time indoors. Holidays, vacation seasons, and sporting events may also cause Accel’s results to fluctuate.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact Accel’s financial position due to adverse changes in financial market prices and rates. Market risk exposure is primarily the result of fluctuations in interest rates.
Interest
rate risk
Accel is exposed to interest rate risk in the ordinary course of its business. Accel’s borrowings under its senior secured credit facility were $350.0 million as of December 31, 2021. If the underlying interest rates were to increase by 1.0%, or 100 basis points, the increase in interest expense on Accel’s floating rate debt would negatively impact Accel’s future earnings and cash flows by approximately $3.5 million annually, assuming the balance outstanding under Accel’s Credit Facility remained at $350.0 million. Cash and cash equivalents are held in cash vaults, highly liquid, checking and money market accounts, VGTs, redemption terminals, ATMs, and amusement equipment. As a result, these amounts are not materially affected by changes in interest rates.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Reference is made to the financial statements, the notes thereto, and the report of our independent registered public accounting firm commencing at page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which financial statements, notes, and report are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
The Company is an “emerging growth company” under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (“JOBS Act”) following the consummation of the merger of TPG Pace Holding Corp. and Accel Entertainment, Inc. The Company has elected to use this extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards pursuant to Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act and as a result of this election, its financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates. The
Company will remain an “emerging growth company” until the earliest to occur of (i) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following June 30, 2022, (b) in which Accel has total annual gross revenue of at least $1.0 billion or (c) in which Accel is deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of Class A-1 common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of the prior second fiscal quarter, and (ii) the date on which Accel has issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period.
In connection with the Business Combination, we began to evaluate, develop and implement “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) , serving as our Principal Executive Officer, and our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), serving as our Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We conducted an evaluation (the “Evaluation”), under the supervision and with the participation of our CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (“Disclosure Controls”) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 pursuant to Rule 13a-15
of the Exchange Act. Based on the Evaluation and considering the review of controls and procedures that is being conducted by our CEO and CFO, our CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective because of the identification of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, as discussed further below.
Accel has identified three material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of Accel’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Accel management is actively addressing the material weaknesses that have been identified
and has developed a comprehensive plan for effective remediation. While these material weaknesses remain unremediated, an increased risk of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements exists, and if remediation of these material weaknesses is not effective, or if Accel fails to develop and maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, its ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable laws and regulations could be impaired.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act and based upon the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO framework”)). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with GAAP.
An effective internal control system, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error or overriding of controls, and therefore can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to reliable financial reporting. Because of its inherent limitations, our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all
misstatements, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud. Effective internal controls can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements.
As a result of management’s review of the Company’s financial and accounting records and the other work completed by the management team, as of December 31, 2021, Accel had three material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting. Based on the existence of three material weaknesses, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2021. These material
weaknesses were previously identified and are summarized below.
Previously Identified Material Weaknesses in our Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Presented below is a summary of the material weaknesses and the related remediation plans that have been developed to address our material weaknesses. These material weaknesses were previously reported in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 and the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
Description
of Material Weakness
Description of Planned Remediation
There is a material weakness in the design and implementation of the Company’s internal controls relating to review of the consolidated financial statements and certain of the associated accounting analysis, journal entries, non-recurring transactions and accounting reconciliations due, in part, to the lack of formally documented accounting policies and procedures, ineffective risk assessment, as well as headcount necessary to support consistent, timely and accurate financial reporting in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Remediation plan includes enhanced management review controls on consolidated financial statements, the documentation of policies and procedures
related to accounting in the consolidated financial statements including, but not limited to, Journal Entry Process, Finance Close, Account Reconciliations, Cash, Fixed Assets, etc., and hiring accounting and finance personnel to support timely and accurate financial reporting. This remediation plan is in-process and not yet fully complete.
There is a material weakness in the design and implementation of the Company’s internal controls relating to business combination accounting and route and customer acquisition cost accounting due to the absence of formalized internal controls surrounding the determination of the fair value and the accounting for assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations and the accounting for the initial route and customer acquisition costs.
Remediation
plan includes engaging third-party business combination valuation specialist to perform acquisition purchase price allocations, and enhanced management review controls on key methodologies, assumptions and inputs used in the valuations performed by the third-party specialist. and implementing internal controls relating to route acquisition cost accounting. This remediation plan is in-process and not yet fully complete.
There is a material weakness in the Company’s general information technology controls including the design and implementation of access and change management internal controls.
Remediation plan includes implementing COSO 2013 framework to evaluate IT environment, design general information technology controls, and implement those controls. This
remediation plan is in-process and not yet fully complete.
As discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, the Business Combination was completed on November 20, 2019. Prior to the Business Combination, Accel was a private company that did not maintain internal controls that were comprehensive enough for a public company. Since the Business Combination, Accel has invested considerable time and resources towards improving the design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. The progress we have made can be summarized as follows:
•We established an Internal Audit department to act as a monitoring portion of our system of quality
controls and to review and make recommendations on designing the internal controls over financial reporting.
•We added additional accounting and finance personnel to support timely and accurate financial reporting and execution of a control framework. We continue to evaluate accounting, finance, information technology and internal audit staffing levels to sufficiently address the size, scope, and complexity of our organization.
•We are developing policies and procedures to assist our finance organization in recording transactions appropriately.
•We
developed a framework to identify risks of material misstatement to our consolidated financial statements and made progress towards reviewing existing controls and designing appropriate controls to mitigate those risks.
•We designed, and are in the process of, implementing procedures and controls over the period-end accounting close process.
• We implemented a formal disclosure certification program that requires certain key personnel to complete a disclosure questionnaire to ensure the consolidated financial statements do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omission of a material fact.
•We expanded our training and education related to internal controls to include workshops and training sessions to improve control awareness and educate all applicable
personnel at the business unit level on internal control topics.
•We hired a third-party valuation specialist to perform acquisition purchase price allocations for our material business combinations and have reviewed the assumptions and inputs used to complete these third-party valuations.
•We developed IT policies and are in the process of implementing those policies.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
As discussed above, we have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. Although we have not remediated the material weaknesses as of December 31, 2021, Accel management is actively addressing the material weaknesses that
have been identified and developed a comprehensive plan of remediation.
Other than the material weaknesses and remediation efforts mentioned above, there were no changes during the quarter ended December 31, 2021, in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 in connection with our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The
information required by this Item is included in our definitive Proxy Statement (see Item 10 above), and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this Item is included in our definitive Proxy Statement (see Item 10 above), and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The
information required by this Item is included in our definitive Proxy Statement (see Item 10 above), and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Our independent registered accounting firm is KPMG LLP, Chicago, IL, Auditor Firm ID: i185.
The information required by this Item is included in our
definitive Proxy Statement (see Item 10 above), and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 15. EXHIBIT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
(1) Financial Statements are
listed in the Index to Financial Statements on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2) Other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not required, or because required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
** Indicates management contract or compensation plan or agreement.
+ Certain information has been excluded from this exhibit because it is not material and would likely cause competitive harm to the registrant if publicly disclosed.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE
PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Andrew Rubenstein and Brian Carroll, and each of them, as his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place, and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing required and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming
all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Accel Entertainment, Inc.:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Accel Entertainment, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not
required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Investment
in convertible notes, less current portion
i—
i30,129
Deferred
income tax asset
i—
i3,824
Other
assets
i3,043
i2,000
Total
noncurrent assets
i215,827
i264,692
Total
assets
$
i616,073
$
i560,241
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Current maturities of debt
$
i17,500
$
i18,250
Current
portion of route and customer acquisition costs payable
i2,079
i1,608
Accrued
location gaming expense
i3,969
i—
Accrued
state gaming expense
i11,441
i—
Accounts
payable and other accrued expenses
i14,616
i23,666
Accrued
compensation and related expenses
i8,886
i5,853
Current
portion of consideration payable
i13,344
i3,013
Total
current liabilities
i71,835
i52,390
Long-term
liabilities:
Debt, net of current maturities
i324,022
i321,891
Route
and customer acquisition costs payable, less current portion
i3,953
i4,064
Consideration
payable, less current portion
i12,706
i20,943
Contingent
earnout share liability
i42,831
i33,069
Warrant
and other long-term liabilities
i17
i13
Deferred
income tax liability
i2,248
i—
Total
long-term liabilities
i385,777
i379,980
Stockholders’
equity:
Preferred Stock, par value of $ii0.0001/;
ii1,000,000/ shares authorized;
iiii0///
shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020
i—
i—
Class
A-1 Common Stock, par value $ii0.0001/; ii250,000,000/
shares authorized; ii93,410,563/ shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2021; ii93,379,508/
shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2020
i9
i9
Treasury
stock, at cost
(i8,983)
i—
Additional paid-in capital
i187,656
i179,549
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
i—
i93
Accumulated
deficit
(i20,221)
(i51,780)
Total
stockholders' equity
i158,461
i127,871
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
$
i616,073
$
i560,241
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
Accel Entertainment, Inc., and its subsidiaries (“the Company”), through its wholly owned subsidiary, Accel Entertainment Gaming LLC, is a terminal operator licensed by the State of Illinois Gaming Board (“IGB”) since March 15,
2012. Its Illinois terminal operator license allows the Company to install and operate video gaming terminals (“VGTs”) in licensed video gaming locations throughout the State of Illinois as approved by individual municipalities. The Company also operates redemption terminals, which also function as automated teller machines (“ATMs”) at its licensed video gaming locations, and amusement equipment at certain locations. The Company's terminal operator license in Illinois, which is not transferable or assignable, requires compliance with applicable regulations and the license is renewable annually unless sooner cancelled or terminated. In
July 2020, the Georgia Lottery Corporation approved one of the Company's consolidated subsidiaries as a licensed operator, or a Master Licensee, which allows the Company to begin the installation and operation of coin operated amusement machines for commercial use by the public for play throughout the State of Georgia. On December 30, 2021, one of the Company's consolidated subsidiaries began amusement operations in Iowa. The
Company is subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations in addition to gaming regulations.
The Company operates i13,639 and i12,247
VGTs across i2,584 and i2,435 locations in the State of Illinois as of December 31,
2021 and 2020, respectively.
On November 20, 2019, TPG Pace Holdings Corp., (“TPG Holdings”) entered into a Transaction Agreement with each of the stockholders of Accel Entertainment, Inc. (“Accel”). Pursuant to the Transaction Agreement and in connection therewith, TPG Holdings acquired, directly or indirectly, all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock and preferred stock from the Accel stockholders. In connection with the closing of the transaction, TPG Holdings changed its name to Accel Entertainment, Inc. This transaction was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization. For more information on this transaction, see Note 3.
The Company is an emerging growth company
("EGC") under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (“JOBS Act”) following the consummation of the merger of TPG Pace Holding Corp. and Accel Entertainment, Inc. The Company has elected to use this extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards pursuant to Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act and as a result of this election, its financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates. The Company will remain an EGC until the earliest to occur of (i) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following June 30, 2022, (b) in which Accel has total annual gross revenue of at least $1.0 billion or (c) in which Accel is deemed to be a large accelerated filer,
which means the market value of Class A-1 common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of the prior second fiscal quarter, and (ii) the date on which Accel has issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period.
Impact of COVID-19 on the Consolidated Financial Statements
In its initial response to the COVID-19 outbreak, the IGB made the decision to shut down all VGTs across the State of Illinois starting at 9:00 p.m. on March 16, 2020 and ultimately extended the shutdown through June 30, 2020. As COVID-19 began a resurgence in the fall of 2020, the virus spread exponentially in every geographical region (currently 11 regions) in the State of Illinois. In response, the IGB suspended all video gaming
operations until further notice across the entire state of Illinois starting at 11:01 PM on Thursday November 19, 2020. Video gaming operations resumed in certain regions of the state beginning on January 16, 2021, and fully resumed in all regions on January 23, 2021. Even though video gaming operations resumed across all regions, certain regions still had government-imposed restrictions that, among other things, limited hours of operation and restricted the number of patrons allowed within in the licensed establishments. These temporary shutdowns of Illinois video gaming impacted i148
of the i365 gaming days (or i40% of gaming days) during the year ended December 31, 2020.
In light of these events and their effect on the Company’s employees and licensed establishment partners, the Company took action to position itself to help mitigate the effects of the temporary cessation of operations. During the initial shutdown, the Company furloughed a significant portion of its employees and deferred certain payments to major vendors. Additionally, members of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
Company's senior management decided to voluntarily forgo their base salaries until the resumption of video gaming operations. Beginning in early June 2020, the Company started reinstating employees from furlough in anticipation of resuming operations on July 1, 2020. During the second shutdown, the Company furloughed idle staff as appropriate and deferred certain payments to major vendors.
As
a result of these developments, the Company's revenues, results of operations and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2020 were materially affected. The COVID-19 situation is rapidly changing as new variant strains continue to pose a threat to the public health and additional impacts to the business and financial results may arise that the Company is not aware of currently.
The Company incurred non-recurring, one-time expenses of $i1.2
million ($i2.5 million of costs less recoveries under the CARES Act of $i1.3 million) for the year ended December 31, 2020, for costs to provide
benefits (e.g., employee portion of health insurance premiums) for furloughed employees during the IGB-mandated COVID-19 shutdown. These costs are included within other expenses, net. The Company also spent $i2.0 million in capital costs for the year ended December 31, 2020 related to the purchase of IGB-mandated spacers for its VGTs to promote social distancing requirements within the gaming area
and incurred operating expenses of $i0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 related to cleaning, disinfecting and sanitizing supplies.
While the IGB announced the resumption of all video gaming activities in January 2021, it is possible that it or the State of Illinois may order a shutdown by region, or a complete suspension of video gaming in the state, or institute stay-at-home, closure or other similar orders or measures in the future in response to a resurgence
of COVID-19 and its related variants or other events. If this were to occur, the Company's revenues, results of operations and cash flows could be materially affected and the Company could recognize impairment losses which could be material.
Note 2. iSummary
of Significant Accounting Policies
iBasis of presentation and preparation: The consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes were prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and of its wholly owned subsidiaries.
All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
iPreviously adopted accounting pronouncements:In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which amends the existing revenue recognition guidance and creates a new topic for Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The guidance provides that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. This guidance also substantially revises required interim and annual disclosures. The Company, as an EGC, elected to use the non-public effective date and adopted the standard in the fourth quarter of 2019 for the annual
period ended December 31, 2019. The Company also elected the modified retrospective adoption approach and applied the standard to all contracts open as of January 1, 2019. The Company's quarterly financial statement disclosure for the first nine months of 2019 reflect the previous accounting standard of FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 605, Revenue Recognition, and will not be restated for the adoption of Topic 606. The cumulative impact of the new revenue standard for fiscal year 2019 was recorded in the fourth quarter and reflects the adjustment
as if the Company adopted the standard as of January 1, 2019. The timing and amount of revenue recognized by the Company did not change upon the adoption of the new standard, however the Company's accounting for route acquisition costs was impacted. ASC 340-40, Other Assets and Deferred Costs - Contracts With Customers (“ASC 340-40”), issued in conjunction with ASU 2014-09, provides updated guidance around accounting for the incremental costs of obtaining a contract
with a customer and for the costs incurred to fulfill a contract with a customer. ASC 340-40 states that an entity should amortize contract cost assets “on a systemic basis that is consistent with the transfer to the customer of the good or services to which the asset relates”, which typically corresponds to the period in which revenue will be recognized. The Company chose
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
straight-line amortization of the contracts as it felt that best depicted when revenue would be recognized and when customers are visiting the gaming establishments. When determining the appropriate amortization period under ASC 340-40, the Company evaluated the impact of any renewal clauses that are likely to be exercised. The Company focused on whether commissions paid for renewals were
commensurate with commissions paid on the original contract. The Company determined the renewal commissions were not commensurate and the amortization period should include expected renewals. As such, the period over which route and customer acquisition costs are amortized was extended to include expected renewals which resulted in an increase to the average life to i12.4 years upon adoption. The
Company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment, net of taxes, to accumulated deficit of $i2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, relating to the decreased in accumulated amortization of route acquisition costs.
iUse of estimates:
The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (i) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, (ii) disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and (iii) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates used by the Company include, among other things, the useful lives for depreciable and amortizable assets, income tax provisions, the evaluation of the future realization of deferred tax assets, projected cash flows in assessing the initial valuation of intangible assets in conjunction with business and asset acquisitions, the selection of useful lives for depreciable and amortizable assets in conjunction with business and asset acquisitions, the valuation of level 3 investments,
the valuation of contingent earnout shares and warrants, contingencies, and the expected term of share-based compensation awards and stock price volatility when computing share-based compensation expense. The Company also estimated stock prices prior to the reverse recapitalization discussed in Note 3 when computing share-based compensation expense. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
Change in estimate: During the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company conducted a review of its estimate of depreciable lives for its gaming terminals and equipment. As a result of this review, the Company extended the useful lives of its gaming terminals
and equipment from i10 years to i13 years as the equipment is lasting longer than originally estimated. The Company has many gaming terminals and equipment that were purchased when the
Company started operations in 2012 that are still being used today.
Also during the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company conducted a review of its estimate of the amortization periods for its route and customer acquisition costs and its location contracts. As a result of this review, the Company extended the amortization period of its route and customer acquisition costs from i12.4
years to i18 years and its location contracts from i10 years to i15
years. In both cases the extended useful lives reflect the Company's strong relationship with its licensed establishment partners as demonstrated by continued high contract renewal rates.
i
The impact of these changes in estimate for the year ended December 31, 2021, was as follows (in thousands):
iSegment
information: The Company operates as a single operating segment. The Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) is the chief executive officer, who has ultimate responsibility for the operating performance of the Company and the allocation of resources. The CODM assesses the Company’s performance and allocates resources based on consolidated results, and this is the only discrete financial information that is regularly reviewed by the CODM.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
i
Cash and cash equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents include bank deposit accounts; term bank deposit accounts; uncollected cash in the
Company’s video gaming terminals, ATMs, and redemption terminals; and cash in Company vaults.
The Company’s policy is to limit the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution. The Company maintains its cash in accounts which may at times exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.
iConvertible
notes: At acquisition, an entity shall classify debt securities as trading, available-for-sale, or held-to-maturity. While the Company has no the intention of selling the notes, it cannot classify them as held-to-maturity due to the conversion feature. Therefore, the Company has classified its investment in convertible notes as available for sale.
iProperty
and equipment: Property and equipment are stated at cost or fair value at the date of acquisition. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Major additions, replacements and improvements are capitalized. Spare parts are included in other current assets when acquired and are expensed when used to repair equipment. iDepreciation has been computed using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
Years
Gaming
terminals and equipment
i13
Amusement and other equipment
i7
Office
equipment and furniture
i7
Computer equipment and software
i3-i5
Leasehold
improvements
i5
Vehicles
i5
Buildings
and improvements
i15-i29
Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life or the lease.
Development
costs directly associated with the acquisition, development and construction of a project are capitalized as a cost of the project during the periods in which activities necessary to prepare the property for its intended use are in progress. Interest costs associated with major construction projects are capitalized as part of the cost of the constructed assets. When no debt is incurred specifically for a project, interest is capitalized on amounts expended for the project using the weighted-average cost of borrowing. Capitalization of interest ceases when the project (or discernible portions of the project) is substantially complete. If substantially all of the construction activities of a project are suspended, capitalization of interest will cease until such activities are resumed.
iConcentration
of credit risk: The Company’s operations are centralized primarily in the State of Illinois. Should there be favorable or unfavorable changes to the Illinois Gaming Act there may be an impact on the Company’s results of operations. The Company has high concentrations of locations within certain municipalities in Illinois which could impact the Company if these municipalities change their gaming laws.
i
Fair
value of financial instruments: The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, convertibles notes, accounts payable, route and customer acquisition costs payable, contingent consideration, contingent earnout shares liability, and bank indebtedness.
The carrying amount of cash, accounts payable and short-term borrowings approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. The Company estimates the fair value of its investment in convertible notes on a recurring basis based on Level 3 inputs. The Company estimates the fair value of its debt using level
two and level three inputs by discounting the future cash flows using current interest rates at which it could obtain similar borrowings in consideration of the estimated enterprise value of the Company.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
Contingent
consideration, which is recorded within consideration payable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, is measured at fair value on a recurring basis based on Level 3 inputs.
The Company's Contingent earnout shares liability and warrant liability is measured at fair value on a recurring basis based on Level 2 inputs.
For further discussion on how the Company determines the fair value of its investment in convertible notes, contingent consideration, contingent earnout shares and warrants, see Note 13.
i
Revenue
recognition: The Company generates revenues from the following types of services: gaming terminals, amusements and ATMs. Revenue is disaggregated by type of revenue and is presented on the face of the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Net gaming revenue is the net cash from gaming activities, which is the difference between gaming wins and losses. Net gaming revenue includes the amounts earned by the licensed gaming locations and is recognized at the time of gaming play. Additionally, taxes and administrative expenses due to the states in which the Company operates are recorded as net gaming revenue and cost of revenue.
Amusement
revenue represents amounts collected from machines (e.g. dart boards, digital jukeboxes, pool tables, etc.) operated at various locations and is recognized at the time the machine is used.
ATM fees and other revenue represents fees charged for the withdrawal of funds from the Company’s redemption terminals and stand-alone ATM machines and is recognized at the time of the transaction.
The Company determined that in a gaming environment, whenever a customer’s money has been accepted by a machine, the Company has an obligation (an implied contract)
to provide the customer access to the game and honor the outcome of the game (in the case of video gaming terminals). The Company determined that the implied contract is entered into between the Company and customers satisfies the requirements of a contract under the new revenue standard, as (i) the contract is a legally enforceable contract with the customer, (ii) the arrangement identifies the rights of the parties, (iii) the contract
has commercial substance, and (iv) the cash is received upfront from the customer, so its collectability is probable. The gaming service is a single performance obligation in each implied contract with the customer. The Company applies the portfolio approach of all wins and losses by gaming terminals daily to determine the total transaction price of the portfolio of implied contracts. The Company recognizes revenue when the single performance obligation is satisfied, which is at the completion of each game.
Route and customer acquisition costs: The
Company’s route and customer acquisition costs consist of fees paid at the inception of contracts entered into with third parties and licensed video gaming establishments throughout the State of Illinois which allow the Company to install and operate video gaming terminals. The route and customer acquisition costs and route and customer acquisition costs payable are recorded at the net present value of the future payments using a discount rate equal to the Company’s incremental borrowing rate associated with its long-term debt. Route and customer acquisition costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over i18
years beginning on the date the location goes live and amortized over the life of the contract, which includes expected renewals. The Company records the accretion of interest on route and customer acquisitions costs payable in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income(loss) as a component of interest expense. For locations that close prior to the end of the contractual term, the Company writes-off the net book value of the route and customer acquisition cost and route and customer acquisition cost payable and records a gain or loss in the consolidated statements
of operations and comprehensive income(loss) as a component of other expenses, net. The Company’s route and customer acquisition costs also consists of prepaid commission costs to the Company's internal sales force of employees. The commissions paid to internal sales employees are subsequently expensed once the respective licensed video gaming location goes live and the commission is earned by the employee.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
iBusiness acquisitions: The Company evaluates the inputs, processes and outputs of each
business acquisition to determine if the transaction is a business combination or asset acquisition. If an acquisition qualifies as a business combination, the related transaction costs are recorded as an expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income. If an acquisition qualifies as an asset acquisition, the related transaction costs are generally capitalized and amortized over the useful life of the acquired assets. The Company accounts for acquisitions using the acquisition method and records the cost of the businesses acquired among tangible and recognized intangible assets and liabilities based upon their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. Recognized intangibles primarily include the value of location contracts.
The Company estimates the fair value of the business acquired using a combination of the cost and income approaches, depending on the specific assets or liabilities acquired. The Company estimates the value of property and equipment and other current assets and liabilities acquired based on their cost, which approximates fair value at acquisition.
iLocation contracts
acquired: Location contracts acquired are accounted for as intangible assets and consist of expected cash flows to be generated from location contracts acquired through business and asset acquisitions. Location contracts acquired are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected useful life of i15 years. Location
contracts are tested for impairment when triggering events occur. If a triggering event were to occur, the Company compares the carrying amount of the location contracts to future undiscounted cash flows. If the value of future undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of an asset group, an impairment loss is recorded based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the asset group./
iGoodwill: Goodwill
represents the difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the identifiable tangible and intangible net assets acquired when accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment annually, as of October 1st, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the goodwill may not be recoverable. When performing the annual goodwill impairment test, the Company conducts a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the goodwill is impaired. Under the qualitative assessment, the Company considers both positive and negative factors, including macroeconomic conditions, industry events, financial performance, and makes a determination of whether it is more likely than not that the fair value
of the goodwill is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the qualitative factors, the Company determines it is more likely than not the goodwill is impaired, it then performs a quantitative test. When performing the quantitative test, the Company compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. If the carrying value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, the Company would record an impairment loss equal to the difference.
Consideration payable: Consideration payable consists of amounts payable related to certain business acquisitions as well as contingent
consideration for future location performance related to certain business acquisitions (see Note 10). Consideration payable, exclusive of contingent consideration, is discounted using the Company’s incremental borrowing rate associated with its long-term debt. The contingent consideration is measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are recognized within the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) as other expenses, net.
iImpairment
of long-lived assets:Long-lived assets, which includes property and equipment, net and other assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset or asset group may not be recoverable. Impairment of the assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount of which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. There were no indicators of impairment of long-lived assets in 2021, 2020, or 2019.
Contingent stock consideration: Contingent stock, which is provided as consideration in business acquisitions,
is valued based on the fair value of stock issued. The contingent stock consideration is discounted using the Company’s weighted average cost of capital and the accretion of interest is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) as a component of interest expense.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
iContingent
earnout shares liability:The Company's Class A-2 common stock is classified as a contingent earnout shares liability due to the fact that the conversion of the Company's Class A-2 common stock would be accelerated on a change of control regardless of the transaction value. The liability is stated at fair value and any change in the fair value is recognized as a gain or loss in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
iWarrant
liability: The Company's Warrants are classified as a liability due to the fact that certain provisions preclude the Warrants from being accounted for as components of stockholders’ equity, including certain settlement provisions that differ based on the holder of the Warrants. The Warrants are measured at fair value at each reporting date in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement. The changes in fair value are recognized in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) in the period of change.
iStock-based
compensation: The Company grants common stock options and/or restricted stock units to certain employees and officers. Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the award, and is recognized as general and administrative expense over the employee’s requisite service period. All stock-based awards are classified as equity awards.
iIncome taxes: The
Company is organized as a C-corporation and files tax returns at the federal and state level. Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the book basis of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of the deferred tax asset, will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in the tax laws and rates as of the date of enactment.
The consolidated financial statements reflect expected future tax consequences of uncertain tax positions presuming the taxing authorities’
full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. When and if applicable, potential interest and penalty costs are accrued as incurred with expenses recognized in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
iEarnings (loss) per share:The
Company computes basic earnings (loss) per share by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the applicable period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share are computed in the same manner as basic earnings (loss) per share, except that the number of shares is increased to assume exercise of potentially dilutive stock options using the treasury stock method, unless the effect of such increase would be anti-dilutive. Under the treasury stock method, the amount the employee must pay for exercising stock options and the amount of compensation cost for future service that the Company has not yet recognized are assumed to be used to repurchase shares.
iDebt
issuance costs: Debt issuance costs are capitalized and amortized over the contractual terms of the related loans. Debt issuance costs are presented as an offset to the related loans on the consolidated balance sheets.
iReverse recapitalization expenses. Legal fees and other costs that were determined to be direct and incremental to the reverse recapitalization were recorded to equity as additional paid-in capital. Other fees associated with the reverse recapitalization
that were not direct and incremental were recorded to other expenses, net on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
iAdvertising costs: Advertising costs are primarily comprised of marketing expenses, which are recorded within general and administrative expense within the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). Advertising costs were
$i4.8 million, $i3.2 million, and $i3.0
million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
Recent accounting pronouncements: In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases
(Topic 842). The guidance in this ASU supersedes the leasing guidance in Topic 840, Leases. In July 2018, the FASB also issued ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, which provides an optional transition method allowing the standard to be applied at the adoption date. Under the new guidance, lessees are required to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. Based on its status as an EGC, the Company expects the new standard will be effective for the
Company's fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2021. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is assessing the impact of the standard on its condensed consolidated financial statements, as well as evaluating the impact on arrangements within potential future acquisitions.
Other recently issued accounting standards or pronouncements have been excluded because they are either not relevant to the Company, or are not expected to have, or
did not have, a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
Note 3. iReverse Recapitalization
As discussed in Note 1, on November 20, 2019, Accel Entertainment, Inc., consummated a business combination pursuant to the Transaction Agreement, which has been accounted for as a reverse recapitalization.
Pursuant to the Transaction Agreement, TPG Holdings Corp. acquired, directly or indirectly, all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock and preferred stock of Accel Entertainment, Inc. In connection with reverse recapitalization, TPG Pace Holdings Corp. changed its name to Accel Entertainment, Inc.
The consideration paid to holders of Accel stock in connection with the reverse recapitalization and subject to the terms and conditions of the Transaction Agreement, consisted of a mix of consideration comprised of cash consideration equal to the number of shares of Accel stock for which such holder of Accel stock made a cash election multiplied by $i177
per share (the “Purchase Price”) and share consideration comprised of a number of Class A-1 common stock equal to the number of shares of Accel Stock for which such holder of Accel Stock did not make a cash election multiplied by an exchange ratio calculated by dividing the Purchase Price by $i10.30, which was the closing price of the common stock of TPG Pace Holdings Corp. on November 20, 2019. In addition, each holder of Accel stock that made a cash election with respect to less than i70%
of its shares of Accel stock received its pro rata share, with such pro rata share determined with reference to a number of shares equal to i70% of such holder’s shares of Accel Stock less the number of shares of Accel stock with respect to which such holder made a cash election, of i2,444,444
Private Placement Warrants (as defined in Note 12), subject to the conditions set forth in a warrant agreement and i3,000,000 Class A-2 common stock, subject to the conditions set forth in a restricted stock agreement.
In connection with the reverse recapitalization, TPG Pace Holdings and its affiliates converted i7,500,000
of Class A-1 common stock, i4,888,889Private Placement Warrants subject to the conditions set forth in the New Pace Warrant Agreement and i2,000,000
Class A-2 common stock, subject to the conditions set forth in a restricted stock agreement.
As part of an Investment Private Placement, certain accredited investors (as defined by Rule 501 of Regulation D) agreed to subscribe for and purchase and TPG Pace Holdings Corp. agreed to issue and sell to such investors i4,696,675 Class A-1 Shares for a purchase price of $i10.22
per share, or an aggregate of approximately $i48 million. The proceeds from the Investment Private Placement was used to fund a portion of the cash consideration required in the reverse recapitalization.
In connection with the reverse recapitalization, Accel repurchased approximately i36,157
shares of its stock from certain employees, directors and officers at a repurchase price of $i177 per share in order to facilitate (i) the repayment of existing loans to Accel’s executive officers, (ii) the exercise of vested options and (iii) funding any resulting tax obligations from the exercise of such vested options.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
i
In accounting for the reverse recapitalization, the net equity deficit from the reverse recapitalization was $i68.4
million as shown in the table below (in thousands):
Less
redemption of Accel shares prior to reverse recapitalization
(i413,733)
Cash balance prior to backstop equity financing
i16,219
Plus
funds from Investment Private Placement
i48,038
Cash balance prior to consummation of the reverse recapitalization
i64,257
Less
adjustments to equity infusion:
Payment for sponsor loan
(i4,000)
Less impact from issuance of contingent earnout shares
(i51,641)
Less
impact from issuance of warrants
(i45,993)
Transaction costs related to the reverse recapitalization, net of tax
(i31,006)
Net
equity deficit prior to stock issuance
(i68,383)
Impact of stock issued in reverse recapitalization
i10
Net
equity deficit from reverse recapitalization
(i68,373)
Less impact from conversion of treasury stock and issuance of warrants
(i7,414)
Net
impact to additional paid-in-capital from reverse recapitalization
$
(i75,787)
/
Capitalization
Adjustments
i
The table below summarizes the number of shares of Accel issued upon consummation of the reverse recapitalization consisting of (i) the number of shares of Accel stock outstanding immediately before the reverse recapitalization along with the impact of the exchange ratio.
Accel
Capital Stock - pre reverse recapitalization
Effect
of exchange ratio to convert Accel stock to A-1 Common Stock
i62,062,715
Shares issued in reverse recapitalization
i14,574,755
Total
A-1 Common Stock
i76,637,470
/
Immediately after the reverse recapitalization, there were ii76,637,470/ Class A-1 common
stock, ii4,999,999/ Class A-2 common stock, and ii22,333,308/
Warrants to purchase Class A-1 Common Stock issued and outstanding. Upon the closing, the Company's Class A-1 Common Stock and public warrants began trading on the New York Stock Exchange.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
— (Continued)
Note 4. iInvestment in Convertible Notes
On July 19, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase up to $i30.0 million
in convertible notes bearing interest at i3% per annum from Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. (“Gold Rush”), another terminal operator in Illinois. The convertible notes each included an option to convert the notes to common stock of Gold Rush prior to the maturity date upon written notice from the Company. At closing, the Company purchased a $i5.0 million
note which was subordinated to Gold Rush’s credit facility and matured isix months following the satisfaction of administrative conditions.
On October 11, 2019, the Company purchased an additional $i25.0 million
note which was also subordinated to Gold Rush’s credit facility and, beginning on July 1, 2020, the balance of this note, if not previously converted, was payable in equal $i1,000,000 monthly installments until all principal has been repaid in full.
On July 30, 2020, the
Company and Gold Rush entered into the Omnibus Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the original agreement to purchase convertible notes from Gold Rush. The Amendment, among other things, extended the maturity date of the $i5.0 million convertible note and the beginning of the payback period for the $i25.0 million
convertible note until December 31, 2020.
On March 9, 2021, the Company and Gold Rush entered into the Second Omnibus Amendment (the “Second Amendment”) to both of the convertible notes and the agreement to purchase the convertible notes. The Second Amendment, among other things, extended the December 31, 2020 maturity and conversion feature of the $i5.0 million
convertible note to December 31, 2021, the maturity and conversion feature of the $i25.0 million convertible note to June 1, 2024 and the beginning of the payback period for the $i25.0 million
convertible note from December 31, 2020 to January 1, 2022.
On July 30, 2021, the Company provided notice to Gold Rush that it was exercising its rights under each of the convertible notes to convert the entire aggregate principal amount and accrued interest into common stock of Gold Rush, subject to approval from the IGB to transfer the common stock to the Company and receipt of other customary closing deliverables.
On December 2, 2021, the
Company received notice from the administrator of the IGB that he was denying the requested transfer of Gold Rush common stock to the Company. The Company disagreed with the administrator’s ruling and requested that the matter be put before the IGB for a public vote. On January 27, 2022, the IGB affirmed the administrator’s denial. Although the Company is pursuing all administrative remedies available to contest the IGB’s ruling, this denial has impacted the conversion assumptions previously used in the accounting valuation of the convertible notes.
Based on the IGB denying the
Company’s request to transfer Gold Rush common stock despite the Company’s unilateral conversions rights, the convertible notes continue to be accounted for as available for sale debt securities, at fair value, with gains and losses recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). The carrying amount of the investment in the convertible notes of $i32.1 million approximates the accounting fair value, in all material respects, as of December 31, 2021. The
Company is evaluating its legal remedies with respect to its rights to receive the Gold Rush common stock or equivalent amounts it is entitled to receive with respect to the convertible notes, the value of which could be materially in excess of the current accounting fair value. The Company recognized an unrealized loss of $i0.1 million and a $i0.1 million
gain, net of taxes, within comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. For more information on how the Company determined the fair value of the convertible notes, see Note 13.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
Note 5. iProperty and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of the following at December 31 (in thousands):
2021
2020
Gaming
terminals and equipment
$
i225,692
$
i197,533
Amusement
and other equipment
i18,547
i23,049
Office
equipment and furniture
i1,731
i1,526
Computer
equipment and software
i14,319
i12,793
Leasehold
improvements
i4,127
i1,707
Vehicles
i11,518
i9,430
Buildings
and improvements
i10,997
i10,845
Land
i911
i911
Construction
in progress
i3,898
i1,886
Total
property and equipment
i291,740
i259,680
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
(i139,489)
(i116,115)
Property
and equipment, net
$
i152,251
$
i143,565
Depreciation
and amortization of property and equipment amounted to $i24.6 million, $i21.0 million and $i26.4
million during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Depreciation expense in 2021 reflects a change in estimate as the Companyextended the useful lives of its gaming terminals and equipment from i10 years to i13
years in the fourth quarter of 2021.
Note 6. iRoute and Customer Acquisition Costs
The Company enters into contracts with third parties and licensed video gaming locations throughout
the State of Illinois which allow the Company to install and operate video gaming terminals. When video gaming operations commence, payments are primarily due monthly. Gross payments due, based on the number of live locations, are approximately $i6.8 million and $i6.4
million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Payments are due over varying terms of the individual agreements and are discounted at the Company’s incremental borrowing rate associated with its long-term debt at the time the contract is acquired. The net present value of payments due is $i6.0 million and $i5.7
million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, of which approximately $i2.1 million and $i1.6 million is included
in current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The route and customer acquisition cost asset is comprised of upfront payments made on the contracts of $i18.0 million and $i17.7
million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The Company has upfront payments of commissions paid to the third parties for the acquisition of the customer contracts that are subject to a claw back provision if the customer cancels the contract prior to completion. The payments subject to a claw back are $i1.5
million and $i1.7 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
i
Route and customer acquisition
costs consist of the following at December 31 (in thousands):
2021
2020
Cost
$
i28,902
$
i27,364
Accumulated
amortization
(i12,989)
(i12,113)
Route
and customer acquisition costs, net
$
i15,913
$
i15,251
/
Amortization
expense of route and customer acquisition costs was $i1.7 million, $i1.8 million and $i1.7
million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Amortization expense of route and customer acquisition costs is slightly lower in 2021 when compared to the prior year asthe Company extended the amortization period of its route and customer acquisition costs from i12.4
years to i18 years in the fourth quarter of 2021.
Location contract assets acquired in business acquisitions are recorded at acquisition at fair value based on an income approach. iLocation
contracts acquired consist of the following at December 31 (in thousands):
Each
asset is amortized over the expected useful life of i15 years. iEstimated amortization expense related to location contracts
acquired for the next five years and thereafter is as follows:
Year ending December 31:
2022
$
i13,151
2023
i13,151
2024
i13,151
2025
i13,151
2026
i13,006
Thereafter
i85,062
Total
$
i150,672
Amortization
expense of location contracts acquired was $i20.3 million, $i20.8 million and $i16.2
million, during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Amortization expense of location contracts is slightly lower in 2021 when compared to the prior year asthe Company extended the amortization period of its location contracts from i10
years to i15 years in the fourth quarter of 2021.
Note 8. iGoodwill
The
Company had goodwill of $i46.2 million as of December 31, 2021, of which $i37.2 million is deductible for tax purposes.
On
December 30, 2020, the Company acquired American Video Gaming, LLC, and Erickson Amusements, Inc. (collectively referred to as "AVG") which was accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations ("Topic 805"). The excess of the purchase price over the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill of $i11.2
million. See Note 10 for more information on how the amount of goodwill was calculated.
On December 30, 2021, the Company entered into an agreement with Rich and Junnie's Coin, Inc., an Iowa corporation, and JBCJ, Inc., also an Iowa corporation (collectively referred to as "Rich and Junnie's") to acquire all of Rich and Junnie's operating assets in Iowa and Illinois. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Topic 805. The excess of the purchase price over the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill of $i0.4
million. See Note 10 for more information on how the amount of goodwill was calculated.
The Company conducted its annual goodwill impairment test on October 1, 2021. The Companyconducted a qualitative assessment, or step zero analysis, to determine whether it is more likely than not that the goodwill was impaired. Under the qualitative assessment, the Company considered both positive and negative factors, including macroeconomic conditions, industry events, financial performance, to make a determination of whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the goodwill is less than its
carrying amount. In performing this assessment, the Company considered such factors as its historical performance, its growth opportunities in existing markets; new markets and new products in determining whether the goodwill was impaired.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
The
Company also referenced its forecasts of revenue, operating income, and capital expenditures and concluded it is more likely than not, that the carrying value of its goodwill was not impaired as of October 1, 2021.
i
The following is a roll forward of the Company's goodwill (in thousands):
The
Company’s debt as of December 31, consisted of the following (in thousands):
2021
2020
Senior Secured Credit Facility (as amended):
Revolving credit facility
$
i—
$
i—
Term
Loan
i350,000
i228,000
Delayed
Draw Term Loan (DDTL)
i—
i119,562
Total
debt
i350,000
i347,562
Less:
Debt issuance costs
(i8,478)
(i7,421)
Total
debt, net of debt issuance costs
i341,522
i340,141
Less:
Current maturities
(i17,500)
(i18,250)
Total
debt, net of current maturities
$
i324,022
$
i321,891
/
Senior
Secured Credit Facility
On November 13, 2019, in order to refinance its prior credit facility, for working capital and other general purposes from time to time, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) as borrower, the Company and its wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries, as a guarantor, the banks, financial institutions and other lending institutions from time to time party thereto, as lenders, the other parties from time to time party thereto and Capital One, National Association, as administrative agent (in such capacity, the “Agent”), collateral agent, issuing bank and
swingline lender providing for a:
•$i100.0 million revolving credit facility, including a letter of credit facility with a $i10.0
million sublimit and a swing line facility with a $i10.0 million sublimit,
•$i240.0
million initial term loan facility and
•$i125.0 million additional term loan facility.
The additional term loan facility was available for borrowings until November 13, 2020. Each of the revolving loans and the term loans were scheduled to mature on November 13, 2024. The Company incurred
$i8.8 million of debt issuance costs related to the Senior Secured Credit Facility, which are being amortized over the life of the Facility.
Given the uncertainty of COVID-19 and its variants and the resulting potential impact to the gaming industry, as well as to provide additional financial flexibility, the Company and the other parties thereto amended the Credit Agreement on August 4, 2020 ("Amendment No. 1") to provide a waiver
of financial covenant breach for the periods ended September 30, 2020 through March 31, 2021 of the First Lien Net Leverage Ratio and Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (each as defined under the Credit Agreement). Amendment No. 1 also raised the floor for the adjusted LIBOR rate to i0.50% and the floor for the Base Rate to
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
i1.50%. The Company incurred costs of $i0.4
million associated with Amendment No.1 of the Credit Agreement, of which $i0.3 million was capitalized and is being amortized over the remaining life of the Credit Agreement. The waivers of financial covenant breach were never utilized as the Company remained in compliance with all debt covenants during these periods.
On October 22, 2021, in order to increase the borrowing capacity under the
Credit Agreement, the Company and the other parties thereto entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Credit Agreement (“Amendment No. 2”). Amendment No. 2, among other things, provides for
•an increase in the amount of the revolving credit facility from $i100.0 million to $i150.0 million,
•$i350.0 million initial term loan facility, the proceeds of which were applied to refinancing existing indebtedness and
•$i400.0 million
delayed draw term loan facility.
The maturity date of the Credit Agreement was extended to October 22, 2026. The interest rate and covenants remain unchanged. The Company incurred $i4.3 million in debt issuance costs associated with Amendment No. 2. The debt issuance costs are presented as a non-cash item on the consolidated statements of cash flows (less the portion impacting net income which are presented within operating activities) as
they were financed with borrowings under the term loan. The Company also recognized a loss on debt extinguishment of $i1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 due to a partial extinguishment associated with certain lenders whose borrowing capacity decreased with the amendment.
As of December 31, 2021, there remained approximately $i550.0
million of availability under the Credit Agreement.
The obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by the Company and its wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries (collectively, the “Guarantors”), subject to certain exceptions. The obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Guarantors, subject to certain exceptions. Certain future-formed or acquired wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries of the Company will also be required to guarantee the Credit Agreement and grant a security interest in substantially all of their
assets, subject to certain exceptions, to secure the obligations under the Credit Agreement.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest, at the Company’s option, at a rate per annum equal to either (a) the adjusted LIBOR rate (“LIBOR”) (which cannot be less than i0.5%) for interest periods of 1, 2, 3 or 6 months (or if consented to by (i) each applicable Lender, 12 months or any period shorter than
1 month or (ii) the Agent, a shorter period necessary to ensure that the end of the relevant interest period would coincide with any required amortization payment) plus the applicable LIBOR margin or (b) the alternative base rate (“ABR”) plus the applicable ABR margin. ABR is a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the highest of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 1/2 of 1.0%, (ii) the prime rate announced from time to time by Capital One, National Association and (iii) LIBOR for a 1-month interest period on such day plus i1.0%. The Credit Agreement also
includes provisions for determining a replacement rate when LIBOR is no longer available. As of December 31, 2021, the weighted-average interest rate was approximately i3.2%.
Interest is payable quarterly in arrears for ABR loans, at the end of the applicable interest period for LIBOR loans (but not less frequently than quarterly) and upon the prepayment or maturity of the underlying loans. The Company is required to pay
a commitment fee quarterly in arrears in respect of unused commitments under the revolving credit facility and the additional term loan facility.
The applicable LIBOR and ABR margins and the commitment fee rate are calculated based upon the first lien net leverage ratio of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, as defined in the Credit Agreement. The revolving loans and term loans bear interest at either (a) ABR (i150
bps floor) plus a margin of i1.75% or (b) LIBOR (i50 bps floor) plus a margin of i2.75%,
at the option of the Company.
The term loans and, once drawn, the additional term loans will amortize at an annual rate equal to approximately i5.00% per annum. Upon the consummation of certain non-ordinary course asset sales, the Company may be required to apply the net cash
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
proceeds thereof to prepay outstanding term loans and additional term loans. The loans under the Credit Agreement may be prepaid without premium or penalty, subject to customary LIBOR “breakage” costs.
The Credit Agreement contains certain customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default and requires the Company and certain of its affiliates obligated under the Credit Agreement to make customary representations and warranties in connection
with credit extensions thereunder.
In addition, the Credit Agreement requires the Company to maintain (a) a ratio of consolidated first lien net debt to consolidated EBITDA no greater than i4.50 to 1.00 and (b) a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated fixed charges no less than i1.20
to 1.00, in each case, tested as of the last day of each full fiscal quarter ending after the Closing Date and determined on the basis of the four most recently ended fiscal quarters of the Company for which financial statements have been delivered pursuant to the Credit Agreement, subject to customary “equity cure” rights.
If an event of default (as such term is defined in the Credit Agreement) occurs, the lenders would be entitled to take various actions, including the acceleration of amounts due under the Credit Agreement, termination of the lenders’ commitments thereunder, foreclosure on collateral, and all other remedial actions available to a secured creditor. The failure to pay certain amounts owing under the Credit Agreement may result in an increase in the interest rate applicable thereto.
The Company's prior credit facility was a senior secured first lien credit facility, as amended, that consisted of a $i125.0 million term loan, a contract draw
loan facility of $i170.0 million and a revolving credit facility of $i85.0 million. The Company’s prior credit facility was with
a syndicated group of banks with CIBC Bank USA, as administrative agent for the lenders. Included in the revolving credit facility and contract draw loan were swing line sub-facilities of $i5.0 million each. The prior credit facility was paid off with the proceeds from the Senior Secured Credit Facility. In connection with the extinguishment of the prior credit facility, the
Company recorded a loss from debt extinguishment of $i1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.
i
The
principal maturities of long-term debt as of December 31, 2021 are as follows (in thousands):
Year ending December 31:
2022
$
i17,500
2023
i17,500
2024
i17,500
2025
i17,500
2026
i280,000
Total
debt
$
i350,000
/
The fair value of the Company’s debt at December 31, 2021 and 2020
was estimated using a discounted cash flow model, which forecasts future interest and principal payments. The forecasted cash flows were discounted back to present value using the term-matched risk-free rate plus an option adjusted spread to account for credit risk. The option adjusted spread was calculated as of the debt's issuance date and then adjusted to the valuation date. The inputs used to determine the fair value were classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy as defined in Note 13.
i
The
carrying value and estimated fair value the Company's debt at December 31, was as follows (in thousands):
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
Note 10. Business and Asset Acquisitions
2021 Pending Acquisitions
On March 2, 2021, the Company announced that it had entered into a securities purchase agreement, to acquire Century Gaming, Inc. (“Century”). Century is Montana’s largest gaming operator and a leader in the Nevada gaming market with over i900
licensed establishments and more than i8,500 gaming terminals across both states. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, the Company will acquire all of the outstanding equity interests of Century in a cash and stock transaction valued at $i140 million.
The transaction was approved by the board of directors of each of the Company and Century, and is expected to close in the first half of 2022, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals from applicable gaming authorities. The transaction is expected to be funded through a combination of the Company’s cash on hand and capacity under its existing credit facility, in addition to the issuance of approximately i450,000
shares of common stock.
2021 Completed Business Acquisitions
On May 20, 2021, the Company acquired Island Games, Inc. (“Island”), a southern Georgia amusement operator and Master Licensee in the state of Georgia. The acquisition of Island adds i30 Georgia Coin Operated Amusement Machine (“COAM”) Class B locations
to the Accel portfolio, including a total of i89 Class B COAM terminals. The total purchase price was approximately $i2.9 million, of which the
Company paid $i2.8 million in cash at closing. The remaining $i0.1 million of contingent consideration is to be paid in cash if certain operating metrics
are achieved. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Topic 805. The purchase price was allocated to the tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values. The results of operations for Island is not material to the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2021.
On December 30, 2021, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire all of Rich and Junnie's operating assets in Iowa and Illinois. Rich and Junnie's operations in Iowa and Illinois
consists of the ownership and operation of amusement devices and ATMs in certain establishments. Total consideration was $i4.2 million of which $i3.6 million which
was paid in cash at closing and $i0.6 million was recorded in short-term consideration payable on the consolidated balance sheets. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Topic 805.The purchase price was allocated to the following assets: i) video game terminals and equipment totaling $i0.3
million; ii) amusement and other equipment totaling $i1.3 million; iii) location contracts totaling $i1.6
million; iv) cash totaling $i0.6 million; and v) goodwill of $i0.4 million. The results of operations for Rich and Junnie's are not material to the consolidated
financial statements of the Company as the acquisition date (December 30, 2021) was one day prior to year end.
2020 Business Acquisitions
Tom's Amusements
On July 22, 2020 (the “Tom's Closing Date”), the Company acquiredTom’s Amusement Company, Inc., (“Tom's Amusements”) a southeastern U.S. gaming and amusement operator and Master Licensee in the state of Georgia. The total purchase price was $i3.6
million, of which the Company paid $i2.1 million in cash at closing. The remaining $i1.5
million of contingent consideration payables are to be paid in cash on the i18-month and i24-month anniversaries
of the Tom's Closing Date. The amount of each payment is $i750,000 multiplied by a performance ratio. The fair value of the contingent consideration was $i1.4
million as of December 31, 2021and is included within consideration payable on the consolidated balance sheets. In addition, the Georgia Lottery Corporation approved Accel's operating subsidiary, Bulldog Gaming, LLC, as a Master Licensee, which allows the Company to install and operate coin operated amusement machines for commercial use by the public for play throughout the State of Georgia.
The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Topic 805. The purchase price of $i3.6
million has been allocated to the following assets: i) video game terminals and equipment
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
totaling $i1.6
million; ii) location contracts totaling $i0.8 million; iii) indefinite-lived gaming license intangible asset of $i1.0
million and; iv) cash of $i0.2 million.
The results of operations for Tom's Amusements are included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company from the date of acquisition. Tom's Amusements generated revenues of $i1.4
million and a net loss of $i0.8 million from the acquisition date through December 31, 2020.
American Video Gaming
On December 30, 2020, the
Company acquired AVG, a terminal operator licensed by the Illinois Gaming Board. AVG had i267 VGTs in i49 licensed establishments. The
Company completed this transaction in order to expand its presence within the State of Illinois.
The acquisition aggregate purchase consideration transferred totaled $i32.0 million, which included i.) cash paid at closing of $i30.5
million and ii.) contingent purchase consideration with an estimated fair value of $i1.5 million. The contingent consideration represents potentially itwo
installment payments i.) $i0.9 million if the acquired locations meet certain base performance criteria and ii.) an additional $i1.4
million if the acquired locations meet additional performance criteria. The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration was determined based on the Company’s expected probability of future payment, discounted using AVG’s weighted average cost of capital. The Company paid $i2.3 million of the contingent consideration during
the year ended December 31, 2021. The fair value of the remaining contingent consideration payments is included within consideration payable on the consolidated balance sheets.
The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Topic 805. The purchase price has been allocated to the tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill.
i
The
following table summarizes the fair value of consideration transferred and the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition (in thousands):
The results of operations for AVG were not material to the consolidated
financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2020 as the acquisition date (December 30, 2020) was one day prior to year end and gaming was suspended in Illinois for that one day.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
— (Continued)
2020 Asset Acquisition
On August 6, 2020, pursuant to the terms of an asset purchase agreement, the Company purchased from Illinois Operators, Inc. terminal use agreements and equipment representing the operations of i13 licensed establishments. The
Company has accounted for this transaction as an asset acquisition. The purchase consideration of $i4.0 million consisted of: i) cash payment of $i3.7 million paid at closing and; ii) deferred payment of $i0.3
million which was paid 90-days from the closing date. The asset acquisition costs were allocated to the following assets: i) video game terminals and equipment totaling $i0.6 million and; ii) location contracts totaling $i3.4
million.
2019 Business Acquisitions
Grand River Jackpot
On August 26, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire all issued and outstanding membership interests in Grand River Jackpot, a terminal operator licensed by the State of Illinois Gaming Board. On September 16, 2019, the Company completed its acquisition of Grand River Jackpot. Grand River Jackpot had i2,009
VGTs in over i450 licensed establishments. The Company completed this transaction in order to expand its presence within the State of Illinois.
The acquisition aggregate purchase consideration transferred totaled $i113.7
million, which included: i) a cash payment made at closing of $i100.0 million; ii) a subsequent cash payment of approximately $i6.6
million for a working capital adjustment and; iii) contingent purchase consideration with an estimated fair value of $i7.1 million. The contingent consideration represents itwo
installment payments that are to be paid, up to a maximum amount, as follows: i) $i2.5 million within 30 days following the ione-year
anniversary of the acquisition closing date and; ii) $i7.0 million within 30 days following the ithree-year
anniversary of the acquisition closing date. These payments are subject to adjustment based on certain performance measures included within the purchase agreement. The estimated fair value was determined based on the Company’s expected probability of future payment, discounted using Grand River Jackpot’s weighted average cost of capital. The cash payment made at closing and subsequent working capital adjustment payment were both funded with the Company’s existing credit facilities. In connection with the temporary suspension of gaming by the IGB due to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, the Company reversed its contingent liability for the previously mentioned $i2.5
million installment payment due 30 days following the one-year anniversary of the acquisition closing date as the performance measures for the period were not reached.
The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Topic 805. The purchase price has been allocated to the tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill. The Grand River Jackpot acquisition resulted in recorded goodwill as a result of a higher consideration multiple paid relative to prior similar acquisitions driven by maturity and quality of the operations and industry, including workforce and corresponding synergies, and is amortizable
for income tax purposes. Management integrated the Grand River Jackpot acquisition into its existing business structure, which is comprised of a single reporting unit.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
The following table summarizes the fair value of consideration transferred and the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition
(in thousands):
The
Company incurred $i0.2 million in acquisition related costs that are included in other operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The results of operations for Grand River Jackpot are included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company
from the date of acquisition. Grand River Jackpot's acquired assets generated revenues and net income of $i16.6 million and $i1.2
million for the year ended December 31, 2019.
2019 Asset Acquisition
On September 23, 2019, pursuant to the terms of an asset purchase agreement, the Company purchased from Illinois Gaming Systems, LLC (“IGS”) terminal use agreements and equipment representing the operations of i139
video game terminals in i29 licensed establishments. The Company has accounted for this transaction as an asset acquisition. The purchase consideration consisted of: i) cash payment of $i2.4
million paid at closing and; ii) note payable of $i2.3 million issued at closing. The asset acquisition costs were allocated to the following assets: i) video game terminals and equipment totaling $i1.7 million
and; ii) location contracts totaling $i3.0 million. The note payable bore interest at i5% and was
paid in full on March 23, 2020.
Pro Forma Results
The following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information reflects the results of operations of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 as if the acquisitions of Rich and Junnie's, Island, AVG, Tom's Amusements, and Grand River Jackpot, had occurred as of the beginning of the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year of acquisition, after giving effect to certain purchase accounting adjustments. These amounts are based on available financial information of the acquirees prior to the acquisition dates and are not necessarily
indicative of what the Company’s operating results would have been had the acquisitions actually taken place at the beginning of the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year of acquisition. iThis unaudited pro forma information for the years ended December 31, does not project revenues and income before income tax expense post acquisition (in thousands).
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
2021
2020
2019
Revenues
$
i738,295
$
i327,090
$
i466,466
Net
income
i31,812
(i626)
(i33,498)
Consideration
Payable
The Company has a contingent consideration payable related to certain locations, as defined, in the respective acquisition agreement which are placed into operation during a specified period after the acquisition date. The fair value of contingent consideration is included in the consideration payable on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020. The contingent consideration accrued is measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
i
Current
and long-term portions of consideration payable consist of the following at December 31 (in thousands):
2021
2020
Current
Long-Term
Current
Long-Term
TAV*
$
i490
$
i2,858
$
i490
$
i3,206
Fair
Share Gaming*
i1,875
i508
i1,096
i523
Family
Amusement*
i677
i1,944
i391
i2,609
Skyhigh*
i801
i7,396
i601
i5,789
G3*
i414
i—
i355
i100
Grand
River Jackpot
i6,479
i—
i—
i5,755
IGS
i—
i—
i80
i—
Island
i100
i—
i—
i—
Tom's
Amusements
i1,491
i—
i—
i1,455
Rich
and Junnie's
i646
i—
i—
i—
AVG
i371
i—
i—
i1,506
Total
$
i13,344
$
i12,706
$
i3,013
$
i20,943
•Acquisitions
that occurred prior to 2019.
/
Note 11. iContingent Earnout Share Liability
As discussed in Notes 1 and 3, on November
20, 2019, the Company, consummated a business combination pursuant to the Transaction Agreement, which has been accounted for as a reverse recapitalization.Pursuant to the terms of the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Company authorized and has available for issuance i10,000,000
shares of Class A-2 Common Stock. The holders of the Class A-2 Common Stock do not have voting rights and are not entitled to receive or participate in any dividends or distributions when and if declared from time to time. The Company's Class A-2 common stock is classified as a contingent earnout shares liability due to the fact that the conversion of the Company's Class A-2 common stock would be accelerated on a change of control regardless of the transaction value.
As discussed in Note 3, i5,000,000
shares of Class A-2 Common Stock were issued with other consideration prior to the reverse recapitalization, subject to the conditions set forth in a restricted stock agreement, which sets forth the terms upon which the Class A-2 Common Stock will be exchanged for an equal number of validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable Class A-1 Common Stock. The exchange of Class A-2 Common Stock for Class A-1 Common Stock will be subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Restricted Stock Agreement, with such exchanges occurring in ithree
separate tranches upon the satisfaction of the following triggers:
•Tranche I, equal to i1,666,666 Class A-2 Common Stock, will be exchanged for Class A-1 Common Stock if either (i) the EBITDA for the last twelve months (“LTM EBITDA”) of the Company (as determined pursuant to the Restricted Stock Agreement) as
of December 31, 2021, March 31, 2022 or June 30, 2022 equals or exceeds $i132 million or (ii) the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
closing sale price of Class A-1 Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) equals or exceeds $i12.00 for at least itwenty
trading days in any consecutive ithirty trading day period;
•Tranche II, equal to i1,666,667
Class A-2 Common Stock, will be exchanged for Class A-1 Common Stock if either (i) the LTM EBITDA of the Company (as determined pursuant to the Restricted Stock Agreement) as of December 31, 2022, March 31, 2023 or June 30, 2023 equals or exceeds $i152 million or (ii) the closing sale price of Class A-1 Common
Stock on the NYSE equals or exceeds $i14.00 for at least itwenty trading days in
any consecutive ithirty trading day period; and
•Tranche III, equal to i1,666,667
Class A-2 Common Stock, will be exchanged for Class A-1 Common Stock if either (i) the LTM EBITDA of the Company (as determined pursuant to the Restricted Stock Agreement) as of December 31, 2023, March 31, 2024 or June 30, 2024 equals or exceeds $i172 million or (ii) the closing sale price of Class A-1 Common
Stock on the NYSE equals or exceeds $i16.00 for at least itwenty trading days in
any consecutive ithirty trading day period.
The LTM EBITDA thresholds will be reasonably adjusted by the independent directors of the board of the Company (the “Board”) from time to time to take into account the anticipated effect of any acquisitions or dispositions that exceed certain thresholds and are otherwise
materially different from certain forecasts.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Class A-2 Common Stock, if not previously exchanged for Class A-1 Common Stock pursuant to the triggers described above, will be exchanged for an equal number of Class A-1 common stock immediately prior to the consummation of a transaction or series of related transactions that would result in a third party or group (as defined in or under Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) becoming the beneficial owner of, directly or indirectly, more than fifty percent of the total voting power of the equity securities of the Company, or more than fifty percent of the consolidated net revenues, net income or total assets (including equity securities of its subsidiaries)
of the Company, provided that the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the aforementioned triggers cannot be determined at such time.
The Restricted Stock Agreement further provides that holders of Class A-2 Common Stock are not required to exchange such shares for Class A-1 Common Stock if, (x) prior to giving effect to exchanges pursuant to the triggers described above, such holder beneficially owns less than i4.99%
of the issued and outstanding Class A-1 Common Stock, and (y) after giving effect to the exchanges pursuant to the triggers described above, such holder would beneficially own in excess of i4.99% of the issued and outstanding Class A-1 Common Stock. However, notwithstanding the limitation described in the previous sentence, if and when a holder of Class A-2 Common Stock has obtained all required gaming approvals from the applicable gaming authorities permitting such holder to beneficially own Class A-1 Common Stock in excess of i4.99%,
then the Class A-2 Common Stock held by such holder which are subject to exchange shall immediately be exchanged for Class A-1 Common Stock without regard to the limitation.
On January 14, 2020, the market condition for the settlement of Tranche I was satisfied. However, as discussed above, no shareholder is permitted to own more than i4.99% of the issued and outstanding Class A-1 Common Stock after the settlement unless obtaining required gaming
approvals from the applicable gaming authorities. In connection with the settlement, no gaming approvals were obtained. As a result, only i1,666,636 of the i1,666,666
Class A-2 Common Stock were converted into Class A-1 Common Stock.
Note 12. iWarrant liability
As discussed in Note 3, i7,333,326
private placement warrants to purchase shares of Class A-1 Common Stock were issued with other consideration prior to the reverse recapitalization (the “Private Placement Warrants”). As a part of the reverse recapitalization, i2,444,437 Private Placement Warrants were canceled and reissued under the same terms and conditions to Accel
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
legacy stockholders. Each Private Placement Warrants expires ifive years from issuance and entitles the holder to purchase ione
share of Class A-1 Common Stock at an exercise price of $i11.50 per share, subject to adjustments substantially similar to those applicable to the other outstanding warrants, at any time i30
days after the consummation of the reverse recapitalization.
In 2017, i15,000,000 warrants to purchase shares of Class A-1 Common Stock were issued in connection with the formation of TPG Pace Holdings (“Public Warrants”). Each Public Warrant expires ifive
years from issuance and entitles the holder to purchase ione share of Class A-1 Common Stock at an exercise price of $i11.50
per share, subject to adjustments substantially similar to those applicable to the other outstanding warrants, at any time i30 days after the consummation of the reverse recapitalization.
On July 14, 2020, the Company announced that it had commenced an exchange offer (the "Offer") to all holders of its outstanding Warrants to receive i0.25
shares of Class A-1 Common Stock in exchange for each Warrant tendered pursuant to the Offer. The Offer was open until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, on August 11, 2020.
On July 16, 2020, the Company consummated the redemption of its Public Warrants. The Company exchanged each Public Warrant for i0.25
shares of the Company’s Class A-1 Common Stock and issued i3,784,416 shares of its Class A-1 Common Stock in exchange for the Public Warrants at settlement of the redemption. The exchange was an equitable exchange at fair value and was accounted for as a capital transaction. On July 22, 2020, the Company received written notice
from the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) that the NYSE suspended trading in, and has determined to commence proceedings to delist, the Company’s Public Warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s Class A-1 Common Stock (ticker symbol ACEL.WS) from the NYSE. The delisting is a result of the failure of the Public Warrants to comply with the continued listing standard set forth in Section 802.01D of the NYSE Listed Company Manual which requires the Company to maintain at least 100 public holders of a listed security.
On August 14, 2020, i7,189,990
of the Private Placement Warrants were validly tendered representing approximately i99.93% of the total Private Placement Warrants outstanding. The Company accepted all such Private Placement Warrants and issued an aggregate of i1,797,474
shares of its Class A-1 Common Stock in exchange for the Private Placement Warrants tendered.
Note 13. iFair Value Measurements
ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and the corresponding disclosure requirements around fair value measurements. This topic applies
to all financial instruments that are being measured and reported on a fair value basis.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the various methods including market, income and cost approaches are used. Based on these approaches, certain assumptions are utilized that the market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable inputs. Valuation techniques are utilized that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Based on the observability of the inputs used in the valuation techniques, it is required to provide information according
to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value will be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level 1: Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange. Level 1 also includes U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities and federal agency mortgage-backed securities, which are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
Level 2: Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets or for similar assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 3: Valuations for assets and liabilities that are derived from other valuation methodologies, including option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, and not based on market exchange, dealer, or broker traded transactions. Level 3 valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value
assigned to such assets or liabilities.
Assets measured at fair value
i
The following tables summarize the Company’s assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Investment
in convertible notes (1)
$
i31,266
$
i—
$
i—
$
i31,266
/
(1)
The fair value on the Company's investment in convertible notes for the year ended December 31, 2020 includes accrued interest of $i1.1 million, which is presented within other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
Investment in convertible notes
The
Company previously engaged a third-party firm to assist it in determining the fair value of its investment in convertible notes. The valuation as of December 31, 2020, utilized a binomial lattice model in which a convertible instrument is split into two separate components: a cash-only (debt) component and an equity component. The binomial lattice trees are constructed using a methodology that assigns up and downward movement factors and probabilities based on rates of return, volatility, and time. It allows for the optional conversion features of the convertible notes to be captured by determining whether conversion or continuing to hold is the most economically advantageous to the holder. Upon conversion, future values in the equity component are subject to only the risk-free rate, while the cash-only component associated with continuing to hold the debt instrument is subject to the selected risk-adjusted discount
rate. Solving backwards through the trees associated with the equity component and the trees associated with the debt component yields an aggregate discounted value for each. The sum of these values yields the indicated fair value of the convertible notes. The discount rate is the risk-adjusted discount rate that is implied by the rate that allows the discounted cash flows with all terms and conditions modeled to equal the total cash consideration. As such, after modeling the features of convertible notes as of the issuance date using the lattice model framework outlined above, the Company solved for the discount rate that resulted in a value for the note equal to the total cash consideration. This valuation of the Company's investment in convertible notes is considered to be a Level 3 fair value
measurement as the significant inputs are unobservable and require significant judgment or estimation.
As described in Note 4, on July 30, 2021, the Company provided notice to Gold Rush that it was exercising its rights to convert the notes into common stock of Gold Rush, subject to approval from the IGB to transfer the common stock to the Company. Accordingly, beginning in the third quarter of 2021, given the pending request for regulatory approval on the transfer of equity interest, the fair value of the convertible notes was estimated using a probability-weighted approach. Assuming
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
regulatory approval was received, the fair value of the convertible notes was estimated on an as-converted basis by multiplying the equity value of Gold Rush by the ownership percentage as calculated pursuant to the terms of the convertible note agreements. In the scenario where regulatory approval was not received, the fair value of the convertible notes was estimated using a discounted cash flow approach assuming the Company would request immediate redemption of the principal and accrued interest and
the discount rate was estimated based on comparable public debt rates. This assumption did not consider legal claims the Company may have under the convertible notes to receive the economic value of the conversion shares, even if transfer of the actual ownership interest in Gold Rush to Accel was not approved by the IGB. After the IGB Administrator’s denial of the transfer of the equity interest on December 2, 2021, the Company concluded that the fair value of the convertible notes should be calculated as principal plus accrued interest as of December 31, 2021. For the avoidance of doubt, this value is less than what Accel maintains Gold Rush owes Accel under the convertible notes, but is consistent
with ASC Topic 820. This valuation of the Company's investment in convertible notes is considered to be a Level 3 fair value measurement as the significant inputs are unobservable and the Company is evaluating its remedies with respect to the amounts owed by Gold Rush.
i
The
following table provides a roll-forward of the fair value of recurring Level 3 fair value measurements for assets for the year ended December 31 (in thousands):
2021
2020
Assets:
Beginning
of year balance
$
i31,266
$
i30,234
Accrued
interest
i928
i903
Fair
value adjustments
(i129)
i129
Ending
balance
$
i32,065
$
i31,266
/
Changes
in the fair value of the investment in convertible notes is included within comprehensive income (loss) on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Liabilities measured at fair value
i
The following tables summarizes the Company’s liabilities that are measured at fair value
on a recurring basis (in thousands):
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Liabilities:
Contingent
consideration
$
i17,260
$
i—
$
i—
$
i17,260
Contingent
earnout shares
i33,069
i—
i33,069
i—
Warrants
i13
i—
i13
i—
Total
$
i50,342
$
i—
$
i33,082
$
i17,260
Contingent
consideration
The Company uses a discounted cash flow analysis to determine the value of contingent consideration upon acquisition and updates this estimate on a recurring basis. The significant assumptions in the Company's cash flow analysis includes the probability adjusted projected revenues after state taxes, a discount rate as applicable to each acquisition, and the estimated number of locations that “go live” with the Company during the contingent consideration period. The valuation of the Company's contingent consideration is considered to be a
Level 3 fair value measurement as the significant inputs are unobservable and require significant judgment or estimation. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities are classified within other expenses, net on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Contingent earnout shares
The Company determines the fair value of the contingent earnout shares based on the market price of the Company's A-1 common stock. The liability, by tranche, is then stated at present value based on i.) an interest rate derived from the
Company's borrowing rate and the applicable risk-free rate and ii.) an estimate on when it expects the contingent earnout shares to convert to A-1 common stock. The valuation of the Company's contingent consideration is considered to be a Level 2 fair value measurement. Changes in the fair value of contingent earnout shares are included within loss (gain) on change in fair value of contingent earnout shares on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Warrants
The Company determines the fair value of its Public Warrants based on their trading price (ticker symbol ACEL.WS) on the NYSE and
is considered to be a Level 1 fair value measurement. The Company initially determined the fair value of its Private Placement Warrants by using the fair value of its Public Warrants and a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires inputs such as the fair value of the Company's A-1 Common Stock, the risk-free interest rate, expected term, expected dividend yield and expected volatility. Beginning in the second quarter of 2020, the valuation of the Private Placement Warrants was based on the trading price of the Company's A-1 Common Stock divided by four as the holders of its outstanding Warrants were
to receive i0.25 shares of Class A-1 Common Stock in exchange for each Warrant tendered in an exchange offer the Company consummated in August 2020. The Company's valuation of its Private Placement Warrants is considered to be a Level 2 fair value measurement. Changes in the fair value of the Warrants are included within (gain) loss on change in fair value of warrants on the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
iThe following table provides a roll-forward of the fair value of recurring Level 3 fair value measurements for liabilities for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
2021
2020
2019
Liabilities:
Beginning
of year balance
$
i17,260
$
i17,327
$
i6,782
Issuance
of contingent consideration in connection with acquisitions
i105
i3,245
i7,216
Payment
of contingent consideration
(i4,358)
(i4,420)
(i1,658)
Fair
value adjustments
i6,427
i1,108
i4,987
Ending
balance
$
i19,434
$
i17,260
$
i17,327
Note 14.
iStockholders’ Equity
As discussed in Notes 1 and 3, on November 20, 2019, the Company, consummated a business combination pursuant to the Transaction Agreement, which has been accounted for as a reverse recapitalization. Pursuant to the Certificate of Incorporation as amended on November
20, 2019 and as a result of the reverse recapitalization, the Company retrospectively adjusted the shares issued and outstanding prior to November 20, 2019 to give effect to the exchange ratio used to determine the number of Class A-1 shares of common stock into which they were converted. Pursuant to the terms of the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Company authorized and has available for issuance the following shares and classes of capital stock, each with a par value of $i0.0001
per share: i) i1,000,000 shares of preferred stock; and ii) i250,000,000 shares of Class A-1 Common Stock.
Class A-1
Common Stock
The holders of the Class A-1 Common Stock are entitled to ione vote for each share. The holders of Class A-1 Common Stock are entitled to receive dividends or other distributions when and if declared from time to time and share equally on a per share basis in such dividends and distributions subject to such rights of the holders of preferred stock.
On September 28, 2020, the
Company completed an underwritten public offering (the “Offering”) of i8,000,000 shares of its Class A-1 common stock (par value $i0.0001
per share) at a price of $i10.50 per share for a total offering size of $i84.0 million. The Company received net proceeds from the sale of shares
of Class A-1 Common Stock sold by it in the Offering of approximately $i79.2 million (net of underwriting discounts and commissions). The Company incurred offering costs totaling $i5.3
million which have been capitalized to additional paid-in capital. The Offering also granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to i1,200,000 additional shares of Class A-1 common stock at the public offering price of $i10.50
less the underwriting discount, exercisable at any time within i30 days of September 23, 2020. In October 2020, the underwriters of the Offering partially exercised their option and purchased an additional i1,133,015
shares at a price of $i10.50 per share, resulting in additional net proceeds to the Company of approximately $i11.2
million (net of underwriting discounts and commissions).
Warrants
On January 31, 2013, the Company issued i253,575 warrants to certain individual stockholders as compensation for providing a personal guaranty for a revolving loan agreement. The warrants granted
their holders the right to purchase the Company’s Class A-1 Common Shares at the price of $i17.80 per share anytime from January 31, 2013 through January 30, 2020. The warrants were classified as an equity instrument. During the year ended December 31, 2019, i190,575
warrants were exercised prior to the reverse recapitalization for proceeds of $i3.4 million.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
Treasury Stock
On November 22, 2021, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program of up to $i200 million of shares of common stock. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety
of factors, including price, general business and market conditions, and alternative investment opportunities. Under the repurchase program, repurchases can be made from time to time using a variety of methods, including open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, in compliance with the rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and other applicable legal requirements. The repurchase program does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of shares, and the repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time at the Company’s discretion. As of December 31, 2021, the Company purchased
i701,305 shares under the plan at a cost of $i9.0 million.
i
At
December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company has reserved Class A-1 Common Stock for future issuance in relation to the following:
2021
2020
Class A-1 Common Stock warrants issued and outstanding
i5,411
i5,411
Class
A-1 Common Stock options and RSUs issued and outstanding
i3,150,215
i3,885,360
Conversion
of Class A-2 Common Stock
i3,333,363
i3,333,363
Class
A-1 Common Stock reserved for issuance
i6,488,989
i7,224,134
/
Note
15. iGaming Terminal Fees
In accordance with the Illinois Video Gaming Act, a 34%tax on net terminal income (such tax increased from 30% to 33% beginning on July 1, 2019 and from 33% to 34% beginning on July 1, 2020), as defined, is payable to the State of Illinois Gaming Board. A i0.8513%
administrative fee is payable to a third-party at the direction of the State of Illinois Gaming Board (the “administrative fee”). Gaming terminal fees, which consist of the tax and administrative fee, totaled $i245.7 million, $i103.6
million and $i133.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The net terminal income remaining is split “50/50” between the Company and the licensed gaming location. The licensed gaming location's share of net terminal income totaled $i230.4
million, $i98.3 million and $i138.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020
and 2019, respectively. The gaming terminal fees and the licensed gaming location's share of net terminal income are recorded in cost of revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Note 16. iEmployee Benefit Plans
401(k)
Plan
The Company maintains a 401(k)-benefit plan for all employees with at least three months of service and have reached 21 years of age. Participants are 100% vested in their contributions. The Company provides an employer match contribution of i50% of the participants’ contribution up to i5%
of their compensation. Participants are fully vested in the employer match contribution after one year of employment. The Company may also make profit sharing contributions to the plan which vest i20% a year after the first i2
years of employment and are fully vested after i6 years of employment. The Company may also elect to make other discretionary contributions to the Plan. The Company incurred 401(k)-benefit plan expense of approximately $i0.9
million, $i0.6 million and $i0.6 million for the years endedDecember 31, 2021, 2020
and 2019, respectively.
Incentive Compensation Plan
Included in certain employee agreements are provisions for bonuses, which are determined at the discretion of management. Bonus expense amounted to $i11.2 million, $i1.9
million and $i2.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Accrued bonuses totaled $i5.1
million and $i2.5 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
Note 17. iStock-based Compensation
The Company grants various
types of stock-based awards including stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”). Stock-based awards are valued on the date of grant and are expensed over the required service period. Total stock-based compensation expense recognized during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, was $i6.4 million, $i5.5
million and $i2.2 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, and 2020, there was approximately $i17.8
million and $i20.0 million, respectively, of unrecognized compensation expense related to stock-based awards, which is expected to be recognized through 2026.
During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, the
Company recognized gross excess tax benefits (expense) from stock-based compensation of $i2.3 million, $i5.2
million, and $(i0.1) million, respectively.Excess tax benefits (expense) reflect the total realized value of the Company’s tax deductions from individual stock option exercise transactions and the vesting of restricted stock awards in excess (deficit) of the deferred tax assets that were previously recorded.
Grant of Stock Options
The
Company previously adopted the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan of Accel Entertainment, Inc., and 2016 Equity Incentive Plan of Accel Entertainment, Inc., (collectively, “Plans”). Under the Plans, the aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued or transferred pursuant to options or restricted stock awards under the Plans will not exceed iten percent of the outstanding shares of the
Company. Options generally vest over a three to ifive-year period. The exercise price of stock options shall not be less than i100%
of the fair market value per share of common stock on the grant date. The term of the options are a maximum of i10 years from the grant date.
In conjunction with the closing of the reverse recapitalization, the Accel Entertainment, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) was adopted. The LTIP provides for grants of a variety of awards to employees and non-employees for providing services to the Company,
including, but not limited to incentive stock options qualified as such under U.S. federal income tax laws, stock options that do not qualify as incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, cash incentive awards, and other stock-based awards. The Company has reserved, and in January 2020 registered, a total of i6,000,000
shares of Class A-1 common stock for issuance pursuant to the LTIP, subject to certain adjustments set forth therein. The term of any options to be granted are for a maximum of i10 years from the grant date. The exercise price of stock options shall not be less than i100%
of the fair market value per share of common stock on the grant date.
Under the LTIP, the Company granted i262,097 stock options to eligible officers and employees of the Company during the year ended December 31,
2021, which will vest over a period of i4 years. The estimated grant date fair value of these options totaled $i1.8
million.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes formula to estimate the fair value of its stock-based payments. The volatility assumption used in the Black-Scholes formula is based on the volatility of comparable public companies. The Company determined the share price at grant date used in the Black-Scholes formula based on an internal valuation model for options granted prior to the Company going public. Upon going public, the Company used the closing market stock price on the date of grant.
The fair value assigned to each option is estimated
on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes-based option valuation model. The expected term of each option granted represents the period of time that each option granted is expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the unit is based on U.S. Treasury yields in effect at the time of grant.
iThe following assumptions were used in the option valuation model for options granted during the years
ended December 31, are as follows:
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
2021
2020
2019
*
Expected approximate volatility
i60%
i38%
i—%
Expected
dividends
iNone
iNone
iNone
Expected
term (in years)
i7
i7
None
Risk-free
rate
i0.72% -i1.17%
i0.44%
- i1.19%
i—%
*
there were ino options granted in 2019
i
A
summary of the options granted and the range in vesting periods based on specific provisions within the option agreements during the years ended December 31, are as follows:
As
of December 31, 2021, and 2020, a total of i145,555 and i216,575
options with a weighted-average remaining contractual term of i3.5 and i1.6
years, respectively, granted to key employees were vested. The fair value of options that vested during 2021, 2020 and 2019 was $i0.3 million, $i0.4
million, and $i1.2 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, and 2020, the weighted-average exercise price of the non-vested awards was $i10.98
and $i8.87, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, and 2020, the weighted-average remaining contractual term of the outstanding awards was i7.5
years and i6.5 years, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options that were exercised during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 was approximately $i5.2
million, $i2.2 million and $i20.7
million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding as of December 31, 2021 is $i4.0 million.
Grant of restricted stock units (“RSUs”)
The Company issued i558,193
RSUs to eligible employees and Directors of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2021, which will vest over a period of i4 to i5
years for employees and a period of i1 year for Directors. The RSUs are valued using the stock price on the grant date and had an estimated grant date fair value of $i6.7
million.
iThe following table sets forth the activities of the Company’s RSUs for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. There were no RSUs granted prior to 2020.
(1) Includes 154,641 RSUs that are vested and issued.
Note 18. iIncome Taxes
Prior to the consummation of the reverse recapitalization, TPG Pace Holding Corp. was registered in the Cayman Islands. On November 20, 2019 TPG Pace Holding Corp. effected a deregistration as an exempted company
in the Cayman Islands under the Cayman Islands Companies Law (2018 Revision), and a domestication as a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware under Section 388 of the DGCL, pursuant to which the Company's jurisdiction of incorporation was changed from the Cayman Islands to the State of Delaware. This domestication was analyzed under the applicable tax laws and it was determined that there were no significant tax implications associated with the domestication.
i
The
Company recognized income tax expense (benefit) of $i15.0 million, $(i16.9) million and $i5.2
million during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively, which consists of the following (in thousands):
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
i
A reconciliation of the “expected” income taxes computed by applying the federal statutory income tax rate to the total expense (benefit) is as follows (in thousands):
2021
2020
2019
Computed
“expected” tax expense (benefit)
$
i9,781
$
(i3,639)
$
(i6,629)
Increase
(decrease) in income taxes resulting from:
State income taxes
i3,659
(i2,848)
i1,634
Return-to-provision
(i258)
(i7,613)
(i340)
Change
in fair value of contingent earnout shares
i2,050
(i1,782)
i2,066
Change
in fair value of warrants
i—
(i2,640)
i4,423
Permanently
non-deductible transaction costs
i215
i485
i2,079
Officer's
compensation
i23
i—
i1,991
Other
permanent items
i18
i220
(i16)
Enacted
rate change
(i28)
(i6)
i—
Other
(i442)
i905
(i9)
Total
income tax expense (benefit)
$
i15,017
$
(i16,918)
$
i5,199
/
In
the third quarter of 2020, the Company filed its federal and state income tax returns and identified certain favorable return-to-provision adjustments, primarily the deductibility of employee and officer compensations costs and transaction costs, following the engagement of specialized tax technical expertise resulting in a change in estimate relative to the Company's best estimate used in the preparation of the 2019 income tax provision. The Company recorded this change in estimate and related income tax benefit of $i7.6
million for the year ended December 31, 2020.
i
The tax effects of temporary differences that gave rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows at December 31 (in thousands):
Unrealized
gain on investments in convertible notes
i—
i37
i35,952
i35,042
Total
deferred tax (liability) asset, net
$
(i2,248)
$
i3,824
/
A
valuation allowance is required to be established or maintained when, based on currently available information, it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The guidance on accounting for income taxes provides important factors in determining whether a deferred tax asset will be realized, including whether there has been sufficient taxable income in recent years and whether sufficient taxable income can reasonably be expected in future years in order to utilize the deferred tax asset.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
The Company evaluated the need to record a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets based on an assessment of whether it is more likely than not that deferred tax benefits will be realized through the generation of future taxable income. Appropriate consideration was given to all available evidence, both positive and negative, in assessing the need for a valuation allowance. As a result of this evaluation, the Company concluded as of December 31, 2021, that the positive evidence outweighed the negative evidence and that it is more likely than not that its deferred tax assets will be realized
The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of multiple state jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2021, the Company was subject to U.S federal income tax examinations for the years 2018 through 2020 and income tax examinations from state jurisdictions for the years 2018 through 2020. The Company's 2017 federal
income tax return was under examination but the audit concluded in the fourth quarter of 2021 with no adjustments.
i
The following table summarizes carryforwards of net operating losses as of December 31 (in thousands):
2021
2020
Amount
Expiration
Amount
Expiration
Federal
net operating losses
$
i61,514
Indefinite
$
i108,830
2033
State
net operating losses
i106,810
2030
i106,004
2030
/
Significant
equity restructuring often results in an Internal Revenue Section 382 ownership change that limits the future use of net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and other tax attributes. The Company has determined that it has undergone an ownership change in 2019 (as defined by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code). As a result, the Company's use of NOL carryforwards on an annual basis will be limited. Neither the amount of the Company's NOL carryforwards nor the amount of limitation of such carryforwards claimed by the Company have been audited or otherwise validated by the Internal Revenue Service, which could challenge
the amount the Company has calculated. The recognition and measurement of the Company's tax benefit includes estimates and judgment by the Company's management, which includes subjectivity. Changes in estimates may create volatility in the Company's tax rate in future periods based on new information about particular tax positions that may cause management to change its estimates.
The Company also had a credit carryforward of approximately $i0.4
million as of December 31, 2020, which was fully utilized in 2021.
On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was signed into law and authorizes more than $2 trillion to battle COVID-19 and its economic effects, including immediate cash relief for individual citizens, loan programs for small business, support for hospitals and other medical providers, and various types of economic relief for impacted businesses and industries. The Company was eligible for certain operational credits of the relief programs under the CARES Act and has recorded a benefit of $i1.3
million to other expenses, net on its consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2020. The Company will continue to monitor the situation and evaluate any additional future legislation.
Note 19. iCommitments
and Contingencies
The Company leases office space under agreements expiring at various dates from June 2022 through July 2028. Total rent expense under these leases approximated $i0.6 million, $i0.5
million and $i0.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the life of the leases. Rent expense is recorded in general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
i
Future minimum payments under these leases are as follows for the years ending December 31 (in thousands):
2022
$
i671
2023
i525
2024
i314
2025
i133
2026
i135
Thereafter
i91
Total
$
i1,869
/
The
Company has certain earnouts in periods for future location performance related to certain business acquisitions (see discussion in Note 10).
The Company has certain employment agreements that call for salaries and potential severance upon termination.
Lawsuits and claims are filed against the Company from time to time in the ordinary course of business, including related to employment of professionals and non-compete clauses and agreements. Other than settled matters explained as follows, these actions are in various stages, and no judgments or decisions have been rendered. Management, after reviewing matters with legal counsel, believes that the outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Accel has been involved in a series of related litigated matters stemming from claims that Accel wrongly contracted with i10 different licensed establishments (the “Defendant Establishments”) in 2012 in violation of the contractual rights held by J&J Ventures Gaming, LLC (“J&J”), as further described below.
On August 21,
2012, one of the Company’s operating subsidiaries entered into certain agreements with Jason Rowell (“Rowell”), a member of Action Gaming LLC (“Action Gaming”), which was an unlicensed terminal operator that had exclusive rights to place and operate VGTs within a number of establishments, including the Defendant Establishments. Under agreements with Rowell, the Company agreed to pay him for each licensed establishment which decided to enter into exclusive location agreements with the Company. In late August and early September 2012, each of the Defendant Establishments signed separate location agreements
with the Company, purporting to grant it the exclusive right to operate VGTs in those establishments. Separately, on August 24, 2012, Action Gaming sold and assigned its rights to all its location agreements to J&J, including its exclusive rights with the Defendant Establishments (the “J&J Assigned Agreements”). At the time of the assignment of such rights to J&J, the Defendant Establishments were not yet licensed by the Illinois Gaming Board (“IGB”).
Action Gaming, J&J, and other parties, collectively, the Plaintiffs, filed a complaint against the Company, Rowell, and other parties in the Circuit Court of Cook County (the “Circuit Court”), on August 31,
2012, as amended on November 1, 2012, December 19, 2012, and October 3, 2013, alleging, among other things, that the Company aided and abetted Rowell in breaches of his fiduciary duties and contractual obligations with Action Gaming and tortiously interfered with Action Gaming’s contracts with Rowell and agreements assigned to J&J. The complaint seeks damages and injunctive and equitable relief. On January 24, 2018, the Company filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as further
described below. On May 14, 2018, the Circuit Court denied the Company’s motion to dismiss and granted a stay to the case, pending a ruling from the IGB on the validity of the J&J Assigned Agreements.
From 2013 to 2015, the Plaintiffs filed additional claims, including J&J Ventures Gaming, LLC et al. v. Wild, Inc. (“Wild”), in various circuit courts seeking declaratory judgements with a number of establishments, including each of the Defendant Establishments, requesting declarations that, among other things, J&J held the exclusive right to operate VGTs at each of the Defendant Establishments as a result of the J&J Assigned Agreements. The Company was granted leave to intervene in
all of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
declaratory judgments. The circuit courts found that the J&J Assigned Agreements were valid because each of the underlying location agreements were between an unlicensed establishment and an unlicensed terminal operator, and therefore did not constitute use agreements that were otherwise precluded from assignment
under the IGB’s regulations. Upon the Company’s appeal, the Illinois Appellate Court, Fifth District (the “District Court”), vacated the circuit courts’ judgments and dismissed the appeals, holding that the IGB had exclusive jurisdiction over the matter that formed the basis of the parties’ claims, and declined to consider the merits of the parties’ disputes. On September 22, 2016, and after the IGB intervened, the Supreme Court of Illinois issued a judgment inWild, affirming the District Court’s decision vacating the circuit courts’ judgments for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and dismissing the appeals, determining that the IGB has exclusive jurisdiction to decide the validity and enforceability of VGT use agreements.
Between
May 2017 and September 2017, both the Company and J&J filed petitions with the IGB seeking adjudication of the rights of the parties and the validity of the use agreements. Those petitions have been fully briefed and remain pending. There is no indication as to when the IGB will rule on the petitions. The Company does not have a present estimate regarding the potential damages, if any, that could potentially be awarded in this litigation and, accordingly, have established no reserves relating to such matters. There are also petitions pending with the IGB which could lead to the Company obtaining new locations.
On October 7,
2019, the Company filed a lawsuit in the Circuit Court of Cook County against Jason Rowell and other parties related to Mr. Rowell’s breaches of his non-compete agreement with the Company. The Company alleged that Mr. Rowell and a competitor were working together to interfere with the Company’s customer relationships. On November 7, 2019, Mr. Rowell filed a lawsuit in the Circuit Court of Cook County against the Company alleging that he had not received certain equity interests in the
Company to which he was allegedly entitled under his agreement. The Company has answered the complaint and asserted a counterclaim, and intends to defend itself against the allegations. Mr. Rowell's claims and the Company's claims are both being litigated in this lawsuit, while the original lawsuit remains pending against the other defendants.
On July 2, 2019, Illinois Gaming Investors, LLC filed a lawsuit against the Company. The lawsuit alleges that a current employee of the Company violated his non-competition agreement with
Illinois Gaming Investors, LLC, and together with the Company, wrongfully solicited prohibited licensed video gaming locations. The lawsuit on its face seeks damages of $i10.0 million. The parties are engaging in discovery and the Company is in the process of defending this lawsuit.
On December 18, 2020, the
Company received a disciplinary complaint from the IGB alleging violations of the Video Gaming Act and the IGB’s Adopted Rules for Video Gaming. The disciplinary complaint seeks to fine the Company in the amount of $i5 million. The Company filed its initial answer to the IGB’s complaint on January 11, 2021 and have begun the
administrative hearing process. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against the allegations in the complaint and denies any allegations of wrongdoing.
Given the status of the legal proceedings discussed above, the Company has determined that a legal liability is probable and recorded an estimated loss of $i0.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2021.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
Note 20. iRelated-Party
Transactions
Subsequent to the Company's acquisitions of Fair Share, G3, Tom's Amusements and AVG, the sellers became employees of the Company.
Consideration payable to the Fair Share seller was $i2.4 million and $i1.6
million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Payments to the Fair Share seller under the acquisition agreement were $i1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 and $ii0.9/
million for both of the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Consideration payable to the G3 sellers was $i0.4 million and $i0.5
million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Payments to the G3 seller under the acquisition agreement were $i0.3 million, $i2.5
million, and $i0.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Consideration payable to the Tom's Amusements seller was $ii1.5/
million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. There were iino/
payments made to the Tom's Amusements seller for the years ended December 31, 2021and 2020.
Consideration payable to the AVG seller was $i0.4 million and $i1.5
million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Payments to the AVG seller under the acquisition agreement were $i2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. There were ino
payments to the AVG seller during the year ended December 31, 2020.
The Company engaged Much Shelist, P.C. (“Much Shelist”), as its legal counsel for general legal and business matters. An attorney at Much Shelist is a related party to management of the Company. For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, Accel paid Much Shelist $i0.2
million, $i0.1 million, and $i0.6 million, respectively. These payments were included in general and administrative expenses within the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), however, $i0.2
million of the amounts paid in the fourth quarter of 2020 were recorded to additional paid-in capital as these costs were determined to be direct and incremental for the reverse recapitalization discussed in Note 3.
As previously mentioned, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of i8,000,000 shares of its Class A-1 common stock,
pursuant to the terms of an Underwriting Agreement, dated September 23, 2020, with Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as representatives of the several underwriters named therein. The Raine Group, which employs a director of the Company, Gordon Rubenstein, was part of the underwriting group and was paid fees totaling $i0.2
million (i5.5% of underwriting fee which was i4.5% of $i84 million).
These payments were capitalized to additional paid-in-capital on the consolidated statements of stockholders' equity (deficit). The Raine Group also provided investment banking services and assisted the Company in the negotiations and consummation of the reverse recapitalization. The Company paid $i11 million to
the Raine Group in 2019.
Throughout the third quarter of 2019, one of the Company’s Class A Common Stockholders made payments on behalf of the Company directly to the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for services rendered to the Company during the same period totaling $i2.9
million. Such amounts are included as a component of other expenses, net in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) and contributed capital in the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity (deficit).
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
Note 21. iEarnings Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of Class A-1 shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed based on the weighted average number of shares plus the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Dilutive potential common shares include
outstanding stock options, unvested RSUs, contingent earnout shares, and warrants.
Since the shares issuable under the contingent earnout are contingently issuable shares that depend on future earnings or future market prices of the common stock or a change in control, the shares are excluded when computing diluted earnings (loss) per share unless the shares would be issuable if the reporting date was the end of the contingency period. Upon settlement, these shares are included in Class A-1 common stock in the Company’s basic EPS share count.
i
The
components of basic and diluted EPS were as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
2021
2020
2019
Net income (loss)
$
i31,559
$
(i410)
$
(i36,764)
Less:
Net income applicable to contingently issuable shares
i—
i909
i—
Net
income (loss) on which diluted earnings per share is calculated
$
i31,559
$
(i1,319)
$
(i36,764)
Basic
weighted average outstanding shares of common stock
i93,781
i83,045
i61,848
Dilutive
effect of stock-based awards for common stock
i857
i—
i—
Dilutive
effect of contingent earnout shares before conversion
i—
i68
i—
Diluted
weighted average outstanding shares of common stock
i94,638
i83,113
i61,848
Earnings
(loss) per share:
Basic
$
i0.34
$
i—
$
(i0.59)
Diluted
$
i0.33
$
(i0.02)
$
(i0.59)
/
Anti-dilutive
stock-based awards, contingent earnout shares and warrants excluded from the calculations of diluted EPS were i4,506,988, i7,224,134,
and i28,561,724 for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Note 22. iSubsequent
Events
As of the filing of the financial statements, the Gold Rush convertible notes (which the Company converted under the terms of the convertible notes to shares of common stock of Gold Rush, but the IGB has currently denied the distribution of shares to the Company) are deemed in default for disclosure and presentation purposes, assuming non-conversion of the convertible notes, as no repayment or installment payments have been received. The Company has classified the entire $i32.1
million accounting fair value of the convertible notes as current on the consolidated balance sheets as the Company hopes to resolve this matter within the next year. The Company did not further adjust the valuation of the convertible notes downward as the Company believes, assuming for accounting purposes that the notes have not been converted, the recorded amounts approximate the accounting fair value. The Company is evaluating its legal remedies with respect to its rights to receive the Gold Rush common stock or equivalent amounts it is entitled to receive with respect to the convertible notes, the value of which could be
materially in excess of the current accounting fair value.
On March 9, 2022, the Company filed a lawsuit in the Circuit Court of Cook County against Gold Rush relating to the Gold Rush convertible notes. The complaint seeks damages for breach of contract and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing as well as unjust enrichment. The lawsuit is publicly available. For more information on the Gold Rush convertible notes, See Note 4.
F-44
Dates Referenced Herein and Documents Incorporated by Reference
