SEC Info - Lightscape Technologies Inc.

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Page	(sequential)	\|	(alphabetic)	Top
		Alternative Formats (Word, et al.) Audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 Business Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Consolidated Balance Sheets as at March 31, 2009 and 2008 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 Controls and Procedures Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Executive Compensation Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Legal Proceedings Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Other Information Part I Part Ii Part Iii Part Iv Principal Accounting Fees and Services Properties Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated July 14, 2009 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated June 11, 2008 Risk Factors Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Selected Financial Data Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders Unresolved Staff Comments
1	1st Page - Filing Submission
"	Part I
"	Item 1. Business
"	Item 1A. Risk Factors
"	Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
"	Item 2. Properties
"	Item 3. Legal Proceedings
"	Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
"	Part Ii
"	Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
"	Item 6. Selected Financial Data
"	Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
"	Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
"	Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
"	Audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
"	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated July 14, 2009
"	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated June 11, 2008
"	Consolidated Balance Sheets as at March 31, 2009 and 2008
"	Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
"	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
"	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
"	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
"	Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
"	Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures
"	Item 9B. Other Information
"	Part Iii
"	Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
"	Item 11. Executive Compensation
"	Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
"	Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
"	Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
"	Part Iv
"	Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

LIGHTSCAPE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [_] No [_]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates (affiliates being, for these purposes only, directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of the registrant’s common stock) of the registrant on September 30, 2008 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $29,683,791.20 based on 37,104,739 non-affiliate shares outstanding at $0.80 per share, which is closing price for the common stock as reported by the quotation service operated by the OTC Bulletin Board on September 30, 2008 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter).

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 55,876,410 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2009.

This annual report contains forward-looking statements as that term is defined in Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “should”, “intends”, “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential”, or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled “Risk Factors”, which may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity or performance to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity or performance expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity or performance. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

In this annual report and unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States dollars, all references to “common shares” refer to the common shares in our capital stock and the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Lightscape Technologies Inc. and our subsidiaries.

We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada under the name “Legacy Bodysentials Inc.” on September 14, 1995. On September 25, 1996, we changed our name to “Legacy Minerals Inc.” and on May 18, 1998, we changed our name to “Global Commonwealth Inc.” On November 12, 1999, we changed our name to “Global Innovative Systems Inc.” and on April 23, 2007, we changed our name to “Lightscape Technologies Inc.” The name change became effective with the OTC Bulletin Board at the opening for trading on April 23, 2007 under the new stock symbol “LTSC”.

We are a holding company for subsidiaries engaged in three main business activities: (i) light-emitting diode (“LED”) out-of-home advertising, (ii) LED solutions and (iii) other lighting source products. During the year

ended March 31, 2009, approximately 0% of our revenue was derived from our LED out-of-home advertising business, 72% from our LED solutions business and 28% from other business.

We design, install and operate LED out-of-home advertising billboards. We are building and expanding our LED out-of-home advertising network (i) through billboard installations which we complete and operate independently, and (ii) through installations which we complete and operate through partnerships and/or joint ventures with major property owners and developers in Asia. We generate revenue by selling advertising space on our LED out-of-home media network to advertisers. We have established and are continuing to establish advertising sales channels for our LED out-of-home advertising network by forming strategic partnerships with advertising agencies and other media industry partners.

We signed a joint venture agreement on February 12, 2008 as part of our efforts to build an LED out-of-home advertising network in the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC” or “China”). We entered this joint venture agreement with Beijing Xintong Media & Cultural Development Co. Ltd. (“BX”). Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture agreement, (i) the joint venture company will be named Beijing Xintong New Vision Media Advertising Co. Ltd. (“BXNV”), (ii) our company agreed to contribute to BXNV cash and an LED billboard for the joint venture’s initial installation within ninety business days of signing the agreement, and (iii) in exchange for these contributions, our company will obtain 50.1% ownership of BXNV, with the remaining 49.9% to be held by BX. The joint venture formation process is ongoing. Certain details of the joint venture arrangement are being finalized, including the process of completing the transfer of the 50.1% share ownership in BXNV from BX to our company (or one of our subsidiaries), and other minor strategic and operational details. Management does not believe that there are any material risks to our ultimate receipt of 50.1% ownership of BXNV as originally contemplated by the terms of the joint venture agreement signed on February 12, 2008. Post-formation, we intend to account for our 50.1% interest in the joint venture as a subsidiary in our consolidated financial statements. As such, we will consolidate all profit and loss, assets and liability items and eliminate the future minority shareholding portion held by BX, in this case 49.9%, as a minority interest. We expect the joint venture agreement to close before the end of December 2009.

The operations of the joint venture company are anticipated to include the sourcing, design installation, servicing and maintenance of large-sized LED billboards at locations in China, and the securing of advertising contracts for advertising and media content to be displayed on the LED screens. The joint venture plans to target niche applications which are currently underserved by existing competition. Target applications include the installation of LED billboards averaging approximately 150 square meters (approximately 1,615 square feet) in area located primarily on outdoor façade walls of shopping centers, hotels, offices and other commercial buildings. The prime locations for the joint venture’s LED screens are major property developments owned by BX’s parent the New World Group.

In addition to the pending joint venture agreement, our company has expanded its out-of-home advertising network relationship with the New World Group by working directly with New World Department Store China (“NWDSC”) properties throughout mainland China. The first phase of the network build-out with NWDSC is expected to include the installation of an LED billboard at each of nine sites across four cities in China and is expected to be completed by September 2009.

The primary end-user markets for the LED out-of-home advertising network are expected to be major advertising agencies in China and Hong Kong, and individual advertisers, such as major corporations and government entities, based in China and Hong Kong. Demand for LED out-of-home advertising is primarily based on clients’ desire to cost-effectively distribute advertisements to as large a target market of viewers as possible. The joint venture’s out-of-home advertising network is expected to meet these demands through the large size of the LED billboards and the location of the LED billboards in high-traffic commercial and residential areas.

Our company has formed strategic partnerships with Ogilvy & Mather Group, a major advertising agency in Hong Kong, and LIME, a diversified media conglomerate, to sell advertising space on our LED billboards. We are also in the process of negotiating strategic partnership agreements and contracts with other advertising agencies and advertisers for the sales of advertising space on the LED billboard network.

During 2006, we entered the LED solutions business through two acquisitions of the shares of Lightscape Technologies (Macau) Limited (“Lightscape Macau”). On February 6, 2006, we incorporated Lightscape Macau as a joint venture company. Initially, we held 50.4% of the issued and outstanding shares of Lightscape Macau after the commencement of the joint venture. On September 29, 2006, however, we acquired the remaining 49.6% of the issued and outstanding shares of Lightscape Macau in consideration for the payment of $1,550 (MOP12,400) and the issuance of 1,200,000 common shares by our company. Immediately upon the acquisition of the remaining 49.6% interest, the 1,200,000 common shares were delivered into escrow pursuant to an Escrow Agreement dated September 29, 2006 between Chan Albert Yee Tat, Luminous LED Technologies Limited, Tech Team Development Limited and Clark Wilson LLP. The escrowed shares were to be held and released to the vendors so long as the net profit of Lightscape Macau is not less than $2,564,103 (HK$20,000,000) during the period from October 1, 2006 to September 30, 2007. If the net profit of Lightscape Macau was less than $2,564,103 (HK$20,000,000) during the period, a percentage of the common shares currently held in escrow equal to the percentage of the shortfall in net profit were to be released by the escrow agent for immediate cancellation by our company, with the balance of the common shares to be released to the vendors. If Lightscape Macau failed to generate any net profit during the period, all of the escrowed shares were to be released by the escrow agent for immediate cancellation by our company. Our company believes that Lightscape Macau failed to generate any audited net profit during the period. We are in the process of completing the procedure to have all of the escrowed shares released from escrow and delivered to our company for cancellation.

During 2007, we also incorporated a wholly-owned subsidiary, Lightscape Technologies (Greater China) Limited in Hong Kong to engage in the LED solutions business in Hong Kong and China.

We operate in three principal lines of the LED products and services industry: (i) LED Systems, (ii) original equipment manufacturing (“OEM”) and Licensing, and (iii) LED Screen Rental Service.

Our operations in the LED products and services industry focus on the use of semiconductor devices, known as LED’s, as the primary light source. Compared to conventional incandescent and fluorescent lamps, LED’s are designed to offer superior efficiency, reliability and creative design versatility with the additional benefits of lower energy consumption, prolonged operational life and the non-use of mercury.

We provide creative design, installation and digital control of high-specification LED systems. Our system designs typically consist of various LED hardware components sourced from third parties, including LED video panels, individual LED modules and lighting fixtures of various sizes, intensities and color capabilities, LED flood lights, spotlights, string lights, cove lights, light tubes and light tiles, submersible LED lights, audio-visual equipment, and related support hardware, cabling and accessories.

These LED-based hardware components are integrated by our design team, installed and then driven by our proprietary digital controller software system, the Multimedia and Video Show Control System. This product is a user-friendly, PC-based software system for the authoring, control and playback of intricate, large-scale video, lighting and audio effects. This product has the ability to simultaneously control up to four high-resolution LED video walls, an unlimited number of multiplex channels, DMX universes, 0-10v analog channels, and RS-232 devices. The software’s graphical user interface and digital control capabilities simplifies the process of creating and playing elaborate video, lighting and multimedia effects through LED systems which may contain thousands of individual addresses.

Our LED systems are designed for both interior and exterior applications, and our sales and marketing strategy targets clients demanding high-performance video and color lighting systems. Demand for our LED systems is primarily based on our end-user clients’ desire to add programmable video and/or dynamic lighting effects to their properties in order to attract and retain customers, and/or to differentiate and accentuate architectural elements. Demand is also driven by clients’ desire for reliable, low-maintenance and energy-efficient video and lighting design solutions.

The primary end-user markets for our LED systems include hospitality (casinos, hotels, nightclubs), entertainment (concert halls, theaters, television studios), retail (shopping centers, digital signage), high-end residential (condominiums), architectural (public landmarks, fountains, office buildings), and special exhibits (conventions, trade show booths). The geographical target markets for our LED systems include Macau, Hong Kong, China and Singapore.

Our LED systems are typically specified within a design plan developed by architects or lighting designers engaged by the owner of an end-user project. Our sales personnel work with the architects and lighting designers on the design process to incorporate our LED systems. Our LED systems are then typically purchased by general contractors or electrical contractors engaged by the owner of an end-user project, or by the project owner directly. During installation of the LED system, we provide on-site supervision to ensure that the LED hardware is properly installed and operational. We also typically provide client training services in the use of our digital controller software, and collaborate with clients in using our software system to create customized video, lighting and multimedia effects for playback on the installed LED system.

Our LED systems are sold primarily by our internal sales team through established relationships with architects, lighting designers and real estate development owners. A core component of our sales team’s approach is a focus on design creativity, including the professional production of videos for each potential client with animated renderings of the artistic vision for the client’s installed systems and the types of creative multimedia and lighting effects that may be achieved.

We offer OEM and licensing of our proprietary digital controller software product, the Multimedia and Video Show Control System. Our OEM business primarily targets LED manufacturers and LED system designers which use our software system to create and control video, lighting and multimedia effects for their own LED systems, which are typically sold under their own brand name. We also license our software system, primarily to owners of end-user projects which have installed or rented our LED systems. Our OEM and licensing sales are primarily made by our internal sales team and our geographical target markets include Macau, Hong Kong, China and Singapore.

We provide rentals of LED-based hardware. The main products we rent include LED video panels and LED video walls. Complementary products we rent include individual LED fixtures of various sizes, intensities and color capabilities, LED flood lights and spotlights. Demand for LED hardware rentals is primarily based on clients’ desire to cost-effectively meet their short-term need for dynamic video and lighting effects in order to deliver advertising, messaging and/or dramatic lighting effects.

The primary markets for LED rentals include corporate events (conventions, conferences, trade shows, special exhibits), advertising companies (indoor and outdoor digital signage), television and film productions, government (special events), and live performances (theatre productions, music concerts). Our LED rental sales are primarily made by our internal sales team and our geographical target markets currently include Macau and Hong Kong.

Through our 76.8% ownership of Beijing Illumination (Hong Kong) Limited (“Beijing Illumination”), we research, develop, manufacture and sell lighting source products. Beijing Illumination, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Beijing Aihua New Enterprise Lighting Appliance Company Limited (“Beijing Aihua”), manufactures and sells high-intensity discharge (“HID”) lighting products including metal halide lamps and high-pressure sodium lamps.

Compared to conventional incandescent and fluorescent lamps, HID lamps produce a much larger quantity of light in a relatively small package. Customer demand for Beijing Illumination’s products is primarily driven by

the ability of HID lamps to generally offer superior efficiency, luminosity, reliability and versatility with the additional benefit of low energy consumption in comparison with conventional incandescent or fluorescent lamps.

Beijing Illumination’s HID lamps are used within a wide variety of industrial, governmental, commercial and residential applications. Metal halide lamps are used primarily for indoor and outdoor lighting of factories, warehouses, industrial plants, airports, sports stadiums, supermarkets, shopping centers, underground parkades and residential buildings. Main applications for high-pressure sodium lamps include street lighting, subway systems, courtyard lighting and general outdoor lighting. Xenon lamps are used within the manufacturing of automobile headlights. Special application HID lamps consist primarily of multi-color lamps which are used in specialized applications such as aquariums, hydroponics, outdoor decorative lighting of buildings, bridges and other large architectural structures, and indoor decorative lighting for theatres and other entertainment venues. The primary applications for ultra high-pressure mercury lamps are as key components within light-weight digital crystal projectors and rear projection televisions.

Beijing Illumination’s internal sales team and sales agents sell its lighting products through a variety of sales channels including manufacturers, wholesalers, distributors, contractors, and directly to end-users. The primary geographical markets for Beijing Illumination’s products are China, Hong Kong, Macau, Singapore, India and the United States.

Each of our operating businesses faces intense competitive pressures within its respective markets. Such competition may come from domestic and international operators. While our businesses are managed with the objective of achieving sustainable growth over the long-term through developing and strengthening competitive advantages, many factors, including market and technology changes, may erode competitive advantages or prevent their strengthening. Accordingly, future operating results will depend to some degree on whether our operating subsidiaries are successful in protecting or enhancing their competitive advantages.

Our LED out-of-home advertising business competes with other China-based out-of-home audiovisual media network providers, including Focus Media Holding Ltd., Clear Media Limited and TOM Group Limited. These companies have large, established out-of-home advertising networks and sales channels, and substantially greater resources to devote to building and maintaining out-of-home advertising networks and securing advertising contracts than we do. Our competitive advantages include: our joint venture partner’s subsidiary relationship with the New World Group, which is expected to enhance the ability of the joint venture to locate LED billboards on high-traffic buildings in prime locations owned by the New World Group, and to enhance its ability to navigate and comply with applicable government regulations; the large-size of our planned LED billboard installations (averaging approximately 150 square meters or 1,615 square feet in area); and our experience in the sourcing, installation and digital control of large-size LED video walls.

Our LED systems, OEM software and LED rental service compete with video and lighting products utilizing traditional lighting technology provided by many vendors. In the high-performance video and color lighting markets in which we have primarily competed to date, competition has largely been fragmented among a number of small manufacturers of LED systems and designers of LED-based lighting solutions. However, we are increasingly experiencing competition from larger, more established companies, including those in the general lighting industry such as Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV which have established and expanded business units competing in the LED systems market. These companies have global marketing capabilities and substantially greater resources to devote to research and development and other aspects of the development, manufacture, marketing, design and installation of LED systems and rentals of LED hardware than we do. Our competitive advantages include: our focus on providing artistic, creative and customized LED solutions which meet clients’ demands for both architectural enhancements and energy-efficiency; our established supply chain to OEM manufacturers of low-cost, high-quality LED hardware; and our proprietary digital controller software system capable of creating customized video, lighting and multimedia effects for playback on installed LED systems.

There are currently about 6 to 8 manufacturers of electric arc tubes of metal halide lamps and approximately 30 manufacturers of electric arc tubes of high-pressure sodium lamps in the PRC. We compete in this business as a low-cost manufacturer.

The primary hardware required for the operation of our LED out-of-home advertising and LED solutions businesses consists of LED billboards and video panels, individual LED modules and fixtures of various sizes, intensities and color capabilities, LED flood lights, spotlights, string lights, cove lights, light tubes and light tiles, submersible LED lights, audio-visual equipment, and related support hardware, cabling and accessories. We purchase our LED-based hardware primarily from third party manufacturers who build these components according to our design and technical specifications. We select component suppliers based on price and quality. Maintaining a steady supply of our LED-based hardware is important to our operations and the growth of our LED solutions business, including our LED out-of-home advertising network. We also develop and integrate proprietary software to drive the authoring, control and playback of content on our LED billboards and our other LED-based systems.

Two OEMs in China were the major suppliers of LED hardware for our LED-based business during the year ended March 31, 2009. There are many qualified alternative suppliers for our equipment, and our obligation to our current suppliers is not exclusive. We have never experienced any material delay or interruption in the supply of our LED hardware.

The primary hardware used in the manufacture of our lighting source products includes lighting ballasts, capacitors, arc tubes and glass bulbs. We purchase component parts from third party wholesale distributors. We select component suppliers based on price and quality. Our company is not materially dependent upon any one supplier for component parts used in the manufacture of our lighting source products, and at the present time, raw materials and components are in adequate supply.

Approximately 20.1% of our total revenue was derived from the sale of LED systems to one customer during the year ended March 31, 2009.

Name	Type	ID No.	Owner	Jurisdiction
Multi Media & Video Show Control System	Patent	HK1105528	Grandplex Development Limited	Hong Kong
FX Glass	Patent	HK1105525	Grandplex Development Limited	Hong Kong
Interactive LED System	Patent	HK1105529	Grandplex Development Limited	Hong Kong
Energy saver	Patent	Application Pending	Grandplex Development Limited	China
Multi Media & Video Show Control System	Patent Cooperation Treaty	Application Pending	Grandplex Development Limited	n/a

Name	Type	ID No.	Owner	Jurisdiction
FX Glass	Patent Cooperation Treaty	Application Pending	Grandplex Development Limited	n/a
LIGHTSCAPE TECHNOLOGIES	Trademark	300850888	Tech Team Investment Limited	Hong Kong
LIGHTSCAPE TECHNOLOGIES	Trademark	028764-028768	Tech Team Investment Limited	Macau
LIGHTSCAPE TECHNOLOGIES	Trademark	T0708254F T0708255D T0708257J	Tech Team Investment Limited	Singapore
LIGHTSCAPE TECHNOLOGIES	Trademark	Application Pending	Tech Team Investment Limited	USA, EU, China
ECO-PRO	Trademark	2000B14800	Grandplex Development Limited	Hong Kong
ECO-PRO	Trademark	TM161948	Grandplex Development Limited	Thailand
ECO-PRO	Trademark	1603844	Grandplex Development Limited	EU
ECO-PRO	Trademark	N/005833	Grandplex Development Limited	Macau

We own and operate the duly registered internet domain names: www.lightscapetech.com.hk and www.techteam.com.hk. The information contained in our websites does not form part of this annual report. Our company makes available, on or through our websites, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports after they are electronically filed or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Additionally, any document filed by us, including this annual report on Form 10-K, may be viewed at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s public reference room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-732-0330 for further information about its public reference room. These Securities and Exchange Commission filings are also available to the public at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at “www.sec.gov”.

Our LED out-of-home advertising business is subject to compliance with certain government regulations in the PRC. We operate our LED out-of-home advertising business in the PRC under a regulatory regime consisting of the State Council, which is the highest authority of the executive branch of the PRC central government, and ministries and agencies under its authority including the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, or SAIC.

The principal regulations governing outdoor advertising businesses in the PRC include:

Companies engaged in advertising activities must obtain from the SAIC or its local branches a business license which specifically includes operating an advertising business within its business scope. Companies conducting advertising activities without such a license may be subject to penalties, including fines, confiscation of advertising income and orders to cease advertising operations. The business license of an advertising company is valid for the duration of its existence, unless the license is suspended or revoked due to a violation of any relevant law or regulation. Our company, our subsidiaries and/or our joint venture company have obtained or are in the process of obtaining such business licenses from the local branches of the SAIC as required by the existing PRC regulations. We do not expect to encounter any material difficulties in obtaining or maintaining our required business licenses for the operation of our LED out-of-home advertising business in the PRC.

The Advertising Law stipulates that the exhibition and display of out-of-home advertisements must not:

In addition, The Outdoor Advertising Registration Administrative Regulations stipulate that outdoor advertisements in China must be registered with the local SAIC before dissemination. Advertising distributors are required to submit a registration application form and other supporting documents for registration, including the content of the proposed outdoor advertisement. After review and examination, if an application complies with the requirements, the local SAIC will issue an Outdoor Advertising Registration Certificate for such advertisement. Our company, our subsidiaries and/or our joint venture company have obtained or are in the process of obtaining such Outdoor Advertising Registration Certificates for the advertisements displayed and intended to be displayed on our LED out-of-home advertising billboards. We do not expect to encounter any material difficulties in obtaining or maintaining our required certificates for the dissemination of out-of-home advertisements in the PRC.

The placement and installation of LED billboards is subject to municipal zoning laws and governmental approvals. Our company, our subsidiaries and/or our joint venture company have obtained or are in the process of obtaining such municipal government approvals for each of our LED out-of-home advertising billboards currently installed or planned to be installed in the PRC. We do not expect to encounter any material difficulties in obtaining or maintaining our required government approvals for the installation or operation of our LED out-of-home advertising billboards in the PRC

PRC advertising regulations stipulate certain content requirements for advertisements in the PRC, which include prohibitions on misleading content, superlative wording, socially destabilizing content or content involving obscenities, superstition, violence, discrimination or infringement of the public interest. Advertisements for anaesthetic, psychotropic, toxic or radioactive drugs are prohibited. It is prohibited to disseminate tobacco advertisements via broadcast media. It is also prohibited to display tobacco advertisements in any public area. There are also specific restrictions and requirements regarding advertisements that relate to matters such as patented products or processes, pharmaceuticals, medical instruments, agrochemicals, foodstuff, alcohol and cosmetics. In

addition, all advertisements relating to pharmaceuticals, medical instruments, agrochemicals and veterinary pharmaceuticals advertised through out-of-home forms of media, together with any other advertisements which are subject to censorship by administrative authorities according to relevant laws and administrative regulations, must be submitted to the relevant administrative authorities for content approval prior to dissemination. We do not believe that advertisements containing content subject to restriction or censorship will comprise a material portion of the advertisements expected to be shown on our LED out-of-home advertising billboard network.

Advertising operators and distributors are required by PRC advertising regulations to ensure that the content of the advertisements they distribute are in full compliance with applicable law. In providing advertising services, advertising operators and distributors must review the prescribed supporting documents provided by advertisers for advertisements and verify that the content of the advertisements comply with applicable PRC laws and regulations. In addition, prior to distributing advertisements for certain commodities which are subject to government censorship and approval, advertising distributors are obligated to ensure that such censorship has been performed and approval has been obtained. Violation of these regulations may result in penalties, including fines, confiscation of advertising income, orders to cease dissemination of the advertisements and orders to publish an advertisement correcting the misleading information. In circumstances involving serious violations, the SAIC or its local branches may revoke violators’ licenses or permits for advertising business operations. Furthermore, advertisers, advertising operators or advertising distributors may be subject to civil liability if they infringe on the legal rights and interests of third parties in the course of their advertising business.

We intend to employ (or access through our joint venture relationship) qualified inspectors specifically trained to review advertising content for compliance with relevant PRC laws and regulations.

Our company spent $6,792 on research and development activities among all of our subsidiaries during the year ended March 31, 2009, as compared to $133,000 spent during the year ended March 31, 2008.

Within our LED solutions business, our software engineers develop and improve upon high-end digital software controllers which integrate the control of video, lighting, electrical and mechanical devices within our LED systems. Our product engineers also develop customized, innovative LED lighting products such as LED lighting tubes to enhance lighting distances and customized LED lighting fixtures for use in our LED lighting systems.

Within our lighting source products business, we have engaged in a joint venture with U.S. based research and development house eeLe Laboratories (LLC) for collaborative research and development of new lighting source products, such as front and rear projection display systems and fiber optic lighting.

To our knowledge, neither the production nor the sale of our products constitute activities or generate materials, in a material manner, that requires compliance with federal, state or local environmental laws in any jurisdictions of our operation.

On a consolidated basis among all of our subsidiaries, our company had a total of 177 employees as of March 31, 2009, all of which were full-time employees. As of March 31, 2009, Bondy Tan was the sole employee of Lightscape Technologies Inc. Mr. Tan is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Lightscape Technologies Inc. Of these employees, none are covered by collective bargaining agreements.

Much of the information included in this annual report includes or is based upon estimates, projections or other forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include projections or estimates made by us and our management in connection with our business operations. While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding the

direction of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future performance suggested herein.

Such estimates, projections or other forward-looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties as outlined below. We caution the reader that important factors in some cases have affected and, in the future, could materially affect actual results and cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed in any such estimates, projections or other forward-looking statements. Prospective investors should consider carefully the risk factors set out below.

Our limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and results of operations.

We have a limited operating history. Accordingly, you should consider our future prospects in light of the risks and uncertainties experienced by early stage companies in evolving markets such as the growing market for LED out-of-home advertising and LED systems in the PRC. Some of these risks and uncertainties relate to our ability to:

If we are unsuccessful in addressing any of these risks and uncertainties, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

We may require additional financing, the availability of which cannot be assured, and if our company is unable to obtain such financing, our business may fail.

Our business plan calls for expenses, working capital and capital expenditures necessary to continue the build-up of our LED out-of-home advertising network and to complete supply and build contracts for LED systems. However, there is no assurance that actual cash requirements will not exceed our estimates. We may need to raise additional funds to:

We depend to a large extent on outside capital over the near-term to fund our capital needs. Such outside capital may be obtained from additional debt or equity financing. We do not currently have any arrangement for financing and there is no assurance that capital will be available to meet our continuing development costs or, if the capital is available, that it will be on terms acceptable to us. Disruptions in financial markets and challenging economic conditions have affected and may continue to affect our ability to raise capital. The issuance of additional equity securities by us would result in a dilution in the equity interests of our current stockholders. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, would increase our liabilities and future cash commitments. If we are unable to obtain financing in the amounts and on terms deemed acceptable to us, we may be unable to implement our business and growth strategies, respond to changing business or economic conditions, withstand adverse operating results, consummate desired acquisitions or compete effectively.

Our operations are cash intensive and our business could be adversely affected if we fail to maintain sufficient levels of working capital.

We expend a significant amount of cash in our operations, principally to fund our procurement of LED-based hardware. Our suppliers typically require payment in full within 30-60 days after delivery, although some of our suppliers provide us with credit. In turn, we typically require our customers to make payment in full on delivery, although we offer some of our long-standing customers credit terms. We generally fund most of our working capital requirements out of cash flow generated from operations. Accordingly, if we fail to generate sufficient revenues from our sales, or if we experience difficulties collecting our accounts receivable, we may not have sufficient cash flow to fund our operating costs and our profitability and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our operating results may fluctuate from period to period and if we fail to meet market expectations for a particular period, our share price may decline.

Our operating results have fluctuated from period to period and are likely to continue to fluctuate as a result of a wide range of factors, including a historical reliance on non-recurring revenue streams. For example, our provision of LED systems generally consists of large-scale, one-off supply and build contracts completed for large property developments. Interim reports may not be indicative of our performance for the year or our future performance, and period-to-period comparisons may not be meaningful due to a number of reasons beyond our control. We cannot assure you that our operating results will meet the expectations of market analysts or our investors. If we fail to meet their expectations, there may be a decline in our share price.

If there are any interruptions to or a decline in the quality of our LED hardware supply channels, our sales could be materially and adversely affected.

LED video screens, modules and lighting hardware are the principal component parts used in our sales. We procure all of our LED hardware from a number of third-party manufacturers. Our third-party suppliers may not continue to be able to provide an adequate supply of LED hardware to satisfy our present and future sales needs. The supply of LED video screens, modules and lighting hardware is dependent on the output of OEM LED manufacturers. Our current suppliers may not be able to provide LED video screens, modules and lighting hardware of sufficient quality to meet our quality control requirements. Any interruptions to or decline in the amount or quality of our LED hardware supply could materially disrupt our sales and adversely affect our business. We are vulnerable to increases in the price of raw materials (particularly of LED modules and video screens) and other operating costs. If the costs of raw materials or other costs of sales and distribution of our products and services increase, and we are unable to entirely offset these increases by raising prices of our products and services, our profit margins and financial condition could be adversely affected.

We operate in a highly-competitive industry and our failure to compete effectively may adversely affect our ability to generate revenue.

Management is aware of similar products and services which compete directly with our LED out-of-home advertising and LED systems, and some of the companies developing and offering these similar products and services have greater financial, technical and marketing resources, larger LED out-of-home advertising and LED system distribution networks, and greater brand name recognition than we do. These companies may develop

products and services superior to those of our company. Such competition will potentially affect our chances of achieving profitability in the future.

This may place us at a disadvantage in responding to our competitors’ pricing strategies, technological advances, marketing campaigns, alliances and other initiatives. Some of our competitors conduct more extensive promotional activities and offer lower prices to customers than we do, which could allow them to gain greater market share or prevent us from increasing our market share. In the future, we may need to decrease our prices if our competitors continue to lower their prices. Our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or changing opportunities, technologies and customer requirements. Further, to the extent our competitors are able to attract and retain customers based on product and/or price advantages, our business and ability to grow could be adversely affected in a material manner. To be successful, we must establish and strengthen our brand awareness, effectively differentiate our product and service lines from those of our competitors and build our strategic partnerships. To achieve this we may have to substantially increase marketing activities and expenses in order to compete effectively.

Our failure to maintain existing relationships or to obtain new relationships with companies that allow us to access desirable locations where we plan to operate our LED out-of-home advertising billboards could harm our growth potential and our ability to increase our revenues.

Our ability to generate future revenues from LED out-of-home advertising sales depends largely upon our ability to secure desirable locations for the installation and operation of our large-scale out-of-home LED billboards. This, in turn, requires that we develop and maintain joint venture, strategic and/or other business relationships with property owners and developers which own the targeted locations suitable to place our LED billboards. If we are unable to maintain our existing relationships or to form new relationships with property owners and developers, our ability to install and operate LED out-of-home billboards would be negatively impacted. In turn, advertisers may not find advertising on our LED out-of-home billboards attractive and may not wish to purchase advertising time slots on our network, which would have a material negative impact on our ability to grow future revenues.

If we are unable to attract advertisers to advertise on the LED out-of-home advertising network we are building, we will be unable to generate advertising fees, which could negatively affect our ability to grow revenues.

The fees we can charge advertisers for time slots on our LED billboard network depends on the size and quality of our LED billboard network and the demand by advertisers for advertising time on our network. Advertisers will choose to advertise on our LED network in part based on the size of our network and the desirability of the locations where we operate our LED out-of-home billboards. If we fail to maintain or to increase the number of locations and LED billboards in our network, advertisers may be unwilling to purchase time on our network which could negatively affect our ability to grow our revenues in the future.

We may be subject to government actions based on the content displayed on and the locations of the LED billboards in the LED out-of-home advertising network we are building in China.

In China, The Outdoor Advertising Registration Administrative Regulations stipulate that out-of-home advertisements in China must be registered with the local State Administration for Industry and Commerce (“SAIC”), before dissemination. Advertising distributors are required to submit a registration application form and other supporting documents for registration, including the content of the proposed out-of-home advertisement. Our company, our subsidiaries and/or our joint venture company have obtained or are in the process of obtaining such Outdoor Advertising Registration Certificates for the advertisements displayed and intended to be displayed on our LED out-of-home advertising billboards. However, we may be subject to government action if advertisements shown on our out-of-home LED network are in violation of relevant PRC advertising laws and regulations or that the advertisements broadcast on our network have not received required approval from the relevant local supervisory bodies.

In addition, the placement and installation of LED billboards in China is subject to municipal zoning laws and governmental approvals. Our company, our subsidiaries and/or our joint venture company have obtained or are in the process of obtaining such municipal government approvals for each of our LED out-of-home advertising billboards currently installed or planned to be installed in the PRC. If our existing or future LED billboards are

installed in violation of municipal zoning laws or without the required government approvals and are required to be removed, it would diminish the attractiveness of our LED out-of-home advertising network for advertisers and adversely affect our ability to sell advertising space on our network which would in turn adversely affect our ability to grow future revenues.

Rapid technological changes in our industry could render our products non-competitive or obsolete and consequently affect our ability to generate revenues.

Currently, we derive a majority of our revenues from the sale of LED systems and lighting source products. We expect to derive a greater proportion of future revenues from our LED out-of-home advertising business. Each of these industries in which we are active are characterized by rapid technological change, new products and services, new sales channels, evolving industry standards and changing client preferences. Our success will depend, in part, upon our ability to make timely and cost-effective enhancements and additions to our technology and to introduce new products and services that meet customer demands. We expect new products and services to be developed and introduced by other companies that compete with our products and services. The proliferation of new LED products and services in our markets may reduce demand for our LED products and services. In addition, the rapid technological advancements in HID lighting products may render our current lighting source products obsolete. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in responding to these or other technological changes, to evolving industry standards or to new products and services offered by our current and future competitors. In addition, we may not have access to sufficient capital for our research and development needs in order to develop new products and services.

We could lose our competitive advantages if we are not able to protect our proprietary technology and intellectual property rights against infringement, and any related litigation could be time-consuming and costly.

Our success and ability to compete depends in part on our proprietary technology incorporated in our products and solutions, such as our Multimedia and Video Show Control System used for the authoring, control and playback of content on our LED advertising billboards and LED systems. If any of our competitors copy or otherwise gain access to our proprietary technology or develop similar technologies independently, we would not be able to compete as effectively. We consider our patents and trademarks invaluable to our ability to continue to develop and maintain the goodwill and recognition associated with our brands. The measures we take to protect the proprietary technology, and other intellectual property rights, which presently are based upon a combination of patent, trademark and trade secret laws, may not be adequate to prevent their unauthorized use. Further, the laws of foreign countries may provide inadequate protection of such intellectual property rights. We may need to bring legal claims to enforce or protect such intellectual property rights. Any litigation, whether successful or unsuccessful, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of corporate resources. In addition, notwithstanding any rights we have secured to our intellectual property, other persons may bring claims against us claiming that we have infringed on their intellectual property rights, including claims that our intellectual property rights are not valid. Any claims against us, with or without merit, could be time-consuming and costly to defend or litigate, divert our attention and resources, result in the loss of goodwill associated with our trademarks or require us to make changes to our technologies.

We may not be able to hire and retain qualified personnel to support our growth and if we are unable to retain or hire such personnel in the future, our ability to improve our products and implement our business objectives could be adversely effected.

To continue our growth, we will need to recruit additional senior management personnel, including persons with financial and sales experience. In addition, we must hire, train and retain a number of other skilled personnel, including persons with experience in LED system design, creative lighting design, development of intelligent LED control software, electrical engineering and operations. Intense competition for these personnel could cause our compensation costs to increase significantly, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Our future success and ability to grow our business will depend in part on the continued service of these individuals and our ability to identify, hire and retain additional qualified personnel. If we are unable to attract and retain qualified employees, we may be unable to meet our business and financial goals.

We are highly dependent on our senior management to manage our business and operations. In particular, we rely substantially on our chief executive officer, Mr. Bondy Tan, to manage our operations. In addition, we also rely on design, engineering, sales and marketing personnel with technical and industry knowledge to market, sell and install our products and services. We do not maintain key man life insurance on any of our senior management or key personnel. The loss of any one of them, in particular Mr. Tan, would have a material adverse effect on our business and operations. Competition for senior management personnel is intense and the pool of suitable candidates is limited. We may be unable to locate a suitable replacement for any senior management personnel that we lose. In addition, if any member of our senior management joins a competitor or forms a competing company, they may compete with us for customers, business partners and other key professionals and staff members of our company.

Our company is subject to sales channel risk due to a concentration of sales to a limited number of customers and any significant interruption from these customers may have a material adverse effect on our company.

Approximately 20.1% of our revenue was contributed from one customer for the year ended March 31, 2009. If this or any of our customers ceased doing business with our company, we would require time to find other customers. If we lose these customers or are unable to generate recurring revenues from these customers, there would be a negative impact on our overall performance. We have not entered into long-term supply contracts with any of these major customers. Therefore, there can be no assurance that we will maintain or improve the relationships with these customers, or that we will be able to continue to supply these customers at current levels or at all. If we cannot maintain long-term relationships with our major customers, the loss of a significant portion of our sales to them could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our company is subject to the credit risk of our customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

We are subject to the credit risk of our customers. Businesses that are good credit risks at the time of sale may become bad credit risks over time. In times of economic recession, the number of our customers who default on payments owed to us tends to increase. If we fail to adequately assess and monitor our credit risks, we could experience longer payment cycles, increased collection costs and higher bad debt expenses. Additionally, to the degree that the ongoing turmoil in the credit markets makes it more difficult for some customers to obtain financing, those customers’ ability to pay could be adversely impacted, which in turn could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Our growth could be impaired if we do not successfully handle certain risks associated with international business.

One or more of these factors may make it difficult for us to fully implement our international business strategies and may have a material adverse effect on our current or future international operations.

The current economic environment has adversely affected business spending patterns, which may have an adverse effect on our business.

The disruptions in the financial markets and challenging economic conditions have adversely affected the world economy, and in particular, reduced spending by businesses. Our operating results in one or more segments may be affected by these uncertain or changing economic conditions and spending patterns. If our customers delay

or cancel spending on LED out-of-home advertising, LED solutions and/or other lighting source products, that decision could result in reductions in sales of our products and services, longer sales cycles and increased price competition. There can be no assurances that government responses to the disruptions in the financial and economic markets will restore spending to previous levels. If global economic and market conditions remain uncertain or persist, spread, or deteriorate further, we may experience material impacts on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from sales in the PRC and any downturn in the Chinese economy could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

A substantial portion of our revenues are generated from sales in the PRC. We anticipate that revenues from sales of our products and services in the PRC will continue to represent a substantial proportion of our total revenues in the near future. Any significant decline in the condition of the PRC economy could, among other things, adversely affect consumer buying power and discourage the purchase of our products and services, which in turn would have a material adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.

Any changes in the political and economic policies of, or any new regulations implemented by, the Chinese government could affect, or even restrict, the operation of our business and our ability to generate revenues.

Our business is currently focused on the sale of LED out-of-home advertising and LED products and services in China. Accordingly, our business, results of operations and financial condition are affected to a significant degree by any economic, political and legal developments in China.

Since the late 1970s, the Chinese government has been reforming its economic system. Although we believe that economic reform and the macroeconomic measures adopted by the Chinese government has had and will continue to have a positive effect on the economic development in China, there can be no assurance that the economic reform strategy will not from time to time be modified or revised. Some modifications or revisions, if any, could have a material adverse effect on the overall economic growth of China and the development of specialty lighting products and services in China. Any such changes would have a material adverse effect on our business. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that the Chinese government will not impose other economic or regulatory controls that would have a material adverse effect on our business. Any changes in the political, economic and social conditions in China, adjustments in policies by the Chinese government or changes in laws and regulations on the sale of LED out-of-home advertising or LED products and services could affect the manner in which we operate our business and restrict or prohibit transactions initiated or conducted by our company. Any such changes or new regulations could affect our ability to develop and sell our products and therefore affect our ability to generate revenues.

Our company is subject to foreign exchange rate risk, particularly fluctuations in the exchange rate between Chinese Renminbi and United States dollars and between Singapore dollars and United States dollars.

Our company may enter sales transactions denominated in Chinese Renminbi and Singapore dollars. While Singapore dollars are free from to exchange control, with free conversion of currency, the PRC State Administration for Foreign Exchange, under the authority of the People’s Bank of China, controls the conversion of Renminbi into foreign currencies. The principal regulation governing foreign currency exchange in China is the Foreign Currency Administration Rules (1996), as amended. Under the Rules, once various procedural requirements are met, Renminbi is convertible for current account transactions, including trade and services, but not for capital account transactions, including direct investment, loan or investment in securities outside China, unless the prior approval of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange of the PRC is obtained. Although the Chinese government regulations now allow greater convertibility of Renminbi for current account transactions, significant restrictions still remain.

The value of the Renminbi is subject to changes in China’s central government policies and to international economic and political developments affecting supply and demand in the China Foreign Exchange Trading System market. The Renminbi is moved to a managed floating exchange rate based on market supply and demand with reference to a basket of foreign currencies. The recent global financial crisis may lead to drastic and unanticipated fluctuations in the exchange rates of Renminbi and Singapore dollars, which may affect our company through either

foreign exchange gains or losses to be accounted for in the statement of operations, and which may materially affect our operating results and financial position.

New or changing government policies or regulations related to the LED out-of-home advertising or LED products and services industries in our markets may have an adverse effect on our operations and may require our company to modify our business plan.

Our management oversees trends in our market industries by accessing available market information, including updated governmental policies and regulations related to such industries from time to time, particularly the LED out-of-home advertising industry in China. Both short and long-term changes in governmental policies or regulations affecting the LED out-of-home advertising or LED products and services industries may trigger our company to take appropriate measures to re-position our company to achieve our business plan or alter the business plan as a whole. We cannot assure that our company will be able to adapt to changing policies and regulations efficiently in order to maintain the currently anticipated level of business, results of operations or financial condition.

If LED-based hardware does not achieve greater market acceptance, prospects for our growth and profitability may be limited.

Our company’s future success depends on increased market acceptance of LED-based hardware. Potential customers for LED-based hardware may be reluctant to adopt LED video and lighting hardware as an alternative to traditional light source technology because of its higher initial cost and relatively low light output in comparison with the most powerful traditional lighting sources, or because of perceived risks relating to LED technology’s novelty, complexity, reliability and quality, usefulness and cost-effectiveness when compared to other lighting sources available in the market. These factors could adversely affect demand for our company’s LED out-of-home advertising billboards and/or our LED systems. If acceptance of LED-based hardware does not continue to grow, opportunities to increase our revenues and operate profitably may be limited.

If advances in LED technology do not continue, we may be unable to increase our penetration of our existing markets or expand into new markets.

Our company does not design or manufacture LEDs or individual LED modules. Our ability to continue penetrating our existing markets and to expand into new markets depends on continued advancements in the design and manufacture by others of LEDs and LED modules. In the LED out-of-home billboard advertising and high-performance LED color lighting markets that we currently serve, we rely on continued improvements in the brightness, efficiency and initial cost of color LEDs. The continued development of LED technologies depends on other companies’ research and is out of our control. If advancements in LED technologies occur at a slower pace than we anticipate, or fail to occur at all, we may be unable to penetrate additional markets, our revenues would be significantly reduced, and our future prospects for success may be harmed.

If we fail to develop and maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud; as a result, current and potential shareholders could lose confidence in our financial reports, which could harm our business and the trading price of our common stock.

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to evaluate and report on our internal controls over financial reporting. The process of strengthening our internal controls and complying with Section 404 is expensive and time consuming, and requires significant management attention. We cannot be certain that the measures we undertake will ensure that we will maintain adequate controls over our financial processes and reporting in the future. Furthermore, if we are able to rapidly grow our business, the internal controls that we will need will become more complex, and significantly more resources will be required to ensure our internal controls remain effective. Failure to implement required controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. If we or our auditors discover a material weakness in our internal controls, the disclosure of that fact, even if the weakness is quickly remedied, could diminish investors’ confidence in our financial statements and harm our stock price. In addition, non-compliance with Section 404 could

subject us to sanctions by the Securities and Exchange Commission, lawsuits, delisting by SROs and/or an assignment of higher risks by investors, which would further reduce our stock price.

Most of our assets, all of our directors and most of our officers are outside the United States, with the result that it may be difficult for investors to enforce within the United States any judgments obtained against us or any of our directors or officers.

Although we are organized under the laws of the State of Nevada, our principal executive office is located in Hong Kong. Outside the United States, it may be difficult for investors to enforce judgments against us obtained in the United States in any such actions, including actions predicated upon civil liability provisions of federal securities laws. In addition, all of our directors and most of our officers reside outside the United States, and many of the assets of these persons and our assets are located outside of the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for investors to affect service of process within the United States upon such persons or to enforce against us or such persons judgments predicated upon the liability provisions of the United States securities laws. There is substantial doubt as to the enforceability against us or any of our directors and officers located outside the United States in original actions or in actions of enforcement of judgments of United States courts or liabilities predicated on the civil liability provisions of United States federal securities laws.

The occurrence of a widespread health epidemic may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our businesses may be adversely affected by widespread regional, national or global health epidemics, such as pandemic flu, including the recent swine flu spreading from Mexico to the rest of the world. Such threats or epidemics may adversely impact our businesses by disrupting provision of services to our customers, and by causing customers to avoid public gathering places. If such health epidemics occur, we may experience material impacts on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

The LED out-of-home advertising and LED products and services industries in the PRC may face increasing competition from both domestic and foreign companies, as well as increasing industry consolidation, which may affect our market share and profit margin.

The specialty lighting industry, including the provision of LED out-of-home advertising billboards, LED lighting systems, LED screen rental services, and advanced lighting products, in the PRC is highly competitive. Our products and services are targeted primarily at property owners and developers, a market in which we face increasing competition. In addition, there is an increasing trend of consolidation throughout the industry. We believe that our ability to maintain our market share and grow our operations within this landscape of changing and increasing competition is largely dependant upon our ability to distinguish the quality of our products and services.

In addition, prior to the entry of the PRC into the World Trade Organization (“WTO”), high barriers to entry existed for many potential competitors in our business through the use of tariffs and restrictive import licensing and distribution practices. The admission of the PRC to the WTO has lowered some of the tariffs and other barriers to entry so we can expect that competition will increase.

We cannot assure you that our current or potential competitors will not develop products or services of a comparable or superior quality to ours, or adapt more quickly than we do to evolving consumer preferences or market trends. In addition, our competitors may merge or form alliances to achieve a scale of operations or sales network which would make it difficult for us to compete. Increased competition may also lead to price wars or negative brand advertising, which may adversely affect our market share and profit margin. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete effectively with our current or potential competitors.

A decline in the price of our common stock could affect our ability to raise further working capital and adversely impact our operations.

A prolonged decline in the price of our common stock could result in a reduction in the liquidity of our common stock and a reduction in our ability to raise capital. Because our operations have been primarily financed through the sale of equity securities, a decline in the price of our common stock could be especially detrimental to our liquidity and our continued operations. Any reduction in our ability to raise equity capital in the future would force us to reallocate funds from other planned uses and would have a negative effect on our business plans and operations, including our ability to develop new products and continue our current operations. If the stock price declines, there can be no assurance that we will be able to raise additional capital or generate funds from operations sufficient to meet our obligations. We believe the following factors could cause the market price of our common stock to continue to fluctuate widely and could cause our common stock to trade at a price below the price at which you purchase your shares:

The market price for our common stock may also be affected by our ability to meet or exceed expectations of analysts or investors. Any failure to meet these expectations, even if minor, could have a material adverse affect the market price of our common stock.

If we issue additional shares in the future, it will result in the dilution of our existing stockholders.

Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of 800,000,000 shares of common stock and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Our board of directors has the authority to issue additional shares up to the authorized capital stated in the certificate of incorporation. Our board of directors may choose to issue some or all of such shares to acquire one or more businesses or to provide additional financing in the future. The issuance of any such shares will result in a reduction of the book value or market price of the outstanding shares of our common stock. If we issue any such additional shares, such issuance also will cause a reduction in the proportionate ownership and voting power of all other stockholders. Further, any such issuance may result in a change of control of our corporation.

If a market for our common stock does not develop, stockholders may be unable to sell their shares.

There is currently a limited market for our common stock, which trades through the OTC Bulletin Board. Trading of stock through the OTC Bulletin Board is frequently thin and highly volatile. There is no assurance that a sufficient market will develop in the stock, in which case it could be difficult for stockholders to sell their stock.

The market price for our common stock may be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations, which may adversely affect the price at which you can sell our shares.

The market price for our common stock may be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to factors including the following:

In addition, the securities market has from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are not related to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market price of our stock.

Trading of our stock may be restricted by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s penny stock regulations which may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted regulations which generally define “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”. The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of, our common stock.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, has adopted sales practice requirements, which may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our shares.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules requiring that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low-priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low-priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit our shareholders’ ability to buy and sell our stock and which may have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

If we are late multiple times in filing any of our annual or quarterly reports during the next two years, our common stock may become ineligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board, which would negatively affect the market for our shares and our ability to obtain additional financing.

Companies trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, such as us, must have a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, as amended, and must be current in their reports under Section 13 in order to maintain price quotation privileges on the OTC Bulletin Board. More specifically, FINRA Rule 6530, which determines eligibility of issuers quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, requires an issuer to be current in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Pursuant to Rule 6530(e), as it is currently in effect, if we file our reports late with the Securities and Exchange Commission three times in a two-year period or our securities are removed from the OTC Bulletin Board twice in a two-year period for failure to file reports, then we will be ineligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board. If we are late multiple times in filing any of our annual or quarterly reports during the next two years, we may become ineligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board. If our common stock becomes ineligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board, it would negatively affect the market for our common stock and it may become more difficult for us to obtain additional equity financing as shares of our common stock would be less attractive to potential investors.

Our principal office is located at 18/F., 318 Hennessy Road, W Square, Wanchai, Hong Kong. The 5,093 square feet office space serves as the base of operations for our corporate, managerial, accounting, financial, administrative, sales and marketing functions. Our company has leased the office premises for the period from August 23, 2008 to August 22, 2011. The monthly fixed rent is $20,293, plus a monthly service charge of $3,142.

Our company has leased premises at workshops 1 and 2, 9^th Floor, Technology Plaza, No. 651 King’s Road, Hong Kong as show room space for our LED lighting products and services. The lease period is from October 15, 2007 to October 14, 2009. The monthly fixed rent is $2,410, plus a monthly service charge of $572.

Our company, through Tech Team Development (Zhuhai) Limited, leases a facility at No. 52, Guang Ming Jei, Xiang Zhou, Zhuhai, PRC. Zhuhai, a Special Economic Zone, is located in Guangdong Province in southern China. The 3,229 square feet space serves as a supporting office for our business development activities in the PRC, as well as a base for logistics and administrative functions related to our business activities in China. The lease period was from March 8, 2008 to March 7, 2009. Our company is negotiating a new rental agreement with the landlord, while the monthly rent remains at $514.

Our company, through Beijing Aihua New Enterprise Lighting Appliance Company Limited, has leased a facility at 1^st to 4^th Floor, No. 7 Shuang-qiao Xili Chaoyang District, Beijing, PRC. The 34,183 square feet space serves as the base for manufacturing, research and development of lighting and specialty lighting source products, as

well as sales and marketing activity within China. The term of the lease is for the period from 2004 to 2010. The monthly fixed rent is $11,291, plus a monthly service charge of $309.

We know of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against our company, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder of more than five percent of our voting securities, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to us or any of our subsidiaries.

No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009.

Shares of our common stock are listed for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board under the trading symbol “LTSC” and the CUSIP number is 53227B 101. Our shares of common stock initially began trading on the OTC Bulletin Board on April 17, 2001 under the trading symbol “GBIS”. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low bid prices for each quarter within the last two fiscal years ended March 31, 2009 as reported by the quotation service operated by the OTC Bulletin Board. All quotations for the OTC Bulletin Board reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

On June 30, 2009, the last reported sale price for shares of our common stock as reported by the quotation service operated by the OTC Bulletin Board was $0.25.

As of June 30, 2009, there were 165 holders of record of shares of our common stock. As of such date, 55,876,410 shares of our common shares were issued and outstanding.

We have not declared or paid any cash dividends since inception. Although there are no restrictions that limit our ability to pay dividends on our common shares, we intend to retain future earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of our business and do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Our company did not have an equity compensation plan in place during the years ended March 31, 2009 or 2008 under which equity securities of our company were authorized for issuance.

As of June 30, 2009, there were warrants to purchase up to 656,250 shares of common stock at any time on or prior to March 17, 2013 by cash exercise at an exercise price of $0.80 per share or by cashless exercise. Pursuant to the terms of such warrants, the exercise price of such warrants is subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, combinations or the like of our common stock.

The transfer agent and registrar of our common stock is Pacific Stock Transfer Company with an address at 500 E. Warm Springs Road, Suite 240, Las Vegas NV 89119, telephone number of (702) 361-3033 and facsimile number of (702) 433-1979.

We did not issue any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2009 or 2008 that were not otherwise disclosed in a quarterly report on Form 10-Q or in a current report on Form 8-K.

Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”. The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities.

As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide this information.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following is a discussion and analysis of our company’s results of operation and the factors that could affect our future financial condition and results of operation. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this

annual report. Our company’s audited consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. All references to dollar amounts in this section are in United States dollars unless expressly stated otherwise. Please see the “Note on Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” for a list of our risk factors.

We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada under the name “Legacy Bodysentials Inc.” on September 14, 1995. On September 25, 1996, we changed our name to “Legacy Minerals Inc.” and on May 18, 1998, we changed our name to “Global Commonwealth Inc.” On November 12, 1999, we changed our name to “Global Innovative Systems Inc.” and on April 20, 2007, we changed our name to “Lightscape Technologies Inc.” The name change became effective with the OTC Bulletin Board at the opening for trading on April 23, 2007 under the new stock symbol “LTSC”.

We are a holding company owning subsidiaries engaged in three main business activities: (i) LED out-of-home advertising, (ii) LED solutions and (iii) other lighting source products. During the year ended March 31, 2009, approximately 0% of our revenue was derived from our LED out-of-home advertising business, 72% from our LED solutions business and 28% from other business.

We operate in three principal lines of the LED products and services industry: (i) LED Systems, (ii) original equipment manufacturing (“OEM”) and Licensing, and (iii) LED Screen Rental Service. We provide

design, installation and digital control of LED video and lighting systems; OEM and licensing of our proprietary digital controller software system; and rentals of LED screens and related hardware.

Through our 76.8% ownership of Beijing Illumination, we research, develop, manufacture and sell lighting source products. Beijing Illumination, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Beijing Aihua, manufactures and sells HID lighting products including metal halide lamps and high-pressure sodium lamps.

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We evaluate, on an on-going basis, our estimates for reasonableness as changes occur in our business environment. We base our estimates on experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments, estimates and uncertainties, and potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe the following are our critical accounting policies:

Our company recognizes revenue when it has persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the product has been delivered and installed or the services have been provided to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. In addition to the aforementioned general policy, the following are specific revenue recognition policies for each major category of revenue.

Advertising – LED out-of-home advertising revenue from advertising services, net of agency rebates and commissions, is recognized ratably over the period in which the advertisement is displayed. Prepayments for the advertising services are deferred and recognized as revenue when the advertising services are rendered.

LED solutions – Our company sells its products directly to end users and through distributors. Revenue is recognized when the product is delivered to the customer and all other revenue recognition criteria are met. Revenues for LED solutions activities provided on a “supply and build basis” and for consultancy services for which the revenue generation process lasts for several months are recognized on the percentage-of-completion (“PC”) method.

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 45, “Long-Term Construction-Type Contracts, (1955)” and AICPA Statement of Position (“SOP”) 81-1, “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts, (1981)” address revenue recognition for long-term construction-type contracts. Since most of our company’s LED solution revenue relates to construction contracts, which by their nature are long-term, the underlying accounting principle known as matching — expenses follow revenues — would be violated if the revenue from the contract were recognized upon contract execution or sale of the services.

There are two acceptable methods of revenue recognition under the preceding pronouncements for construction contractors. These are not alternative methods, however, from which contractors are free to choose regardless of the circumstances. One is the PC method and the other is the completed contract (“CC”) method. Under the PC method, the construction contractor recognizes revenue over the life of the construction contract based on the degree of completion. For example, 50% completion means recognition of one-half of revenues, costs, and income. Under the CC method, all revenues, costs, and income are

recognized only at completion of the construction project, ordinarily at the end of the construction contract. The PC method is preferred and should be used whenever the conditions for its use are satisfied.

SOP 81-1 requires that the PC method be used in lieu of the CC method when all of the following are present: (1) reasonably reliable estimates can be made of revenue and costs; (2) the construction contract specifies the parties’ rights as to the goods, consideration to be paid and received, and the resulting terms of payment or settlement; (3) the contract purchaser has the ability and expectation to perform all contractual duties; and (4) the contract contractor has the same ability and expectation to perform.

SOP 81-1 states, “Contract costs generally include direct costs, such as materials, direct labor, and subcontracts and indirect costs identifiable with or allocable to the contracts.”

Our company always seeks to use the fairest approximation of the PC method. LED solutions projects for which our clients can provide their quantity surveyor’s certificate (“QC certificate”) allow us to use the certificate as a basis that is applied consistently for estimation and accrual of revenue and related costs. In the absence of a QC certificate, our company will calculate a project’s PC based on the ratio of incurred costs to estimated final costs.

Contract costs include all direct material, labor, subcontract and other costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect salaries and wages, equipment repairs and depreciation, insurance and payroll taxes. Administrative and general expenses are charged to expense as incurred. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. Changes in job performance, job conditions and estimated profitability, including those changes arising from contract penalty provisions and final contract settlements may result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. An amount attributable to contract claims is included in revenues when realization is probable and the amount can be reliably estimated. We generally provide a one-year warranty for workmanship under our contracts. Warranty claims historically have been inconsequential.

The asset, “Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts” represents revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed on these contracts. The liability “Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts” represents billings in excess of revenues recognized on these contracts.

Other – This includes sales of lighting source products, rental income, commission and service income and sales-type lease income. Regarding sales of lighting source products, our company sells its products directly to end users and through distributors. Revenue is recognized when the product is delivered to the customer and all other revenue recognition criteria are met. Revenue from rentals and operating leases without any acceptance provisions is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the rental or lease. Revenue regarding commission and service income is recognized when services are rendered. Revenue from sales-type leases is recognized over the term of the lease, using the effective interest method.

The functional currency of our company is Hong Kong dollars (“HKD”). Transactions in other currencies are recorded in HKD at the rates of exchange prevailing when the transactions occur. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in other currencies are measured in HKD at rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet dates. Exchange gains and losses are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations as a component of current period earnings. For financial reporting purposes, the financial statements of our company which are prepared using the functional currency have been translated into United States dollars. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates at the balance sheet dates and revenue and expenses are translated at the average exchange rate for the period and stockholders’ equity is translated at historical exchange rates. Any translation adjustments resulting from the translation are included in foreign exchange adjustment in other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders’ equity.

Our company reviews long-lived assets for potential impairment based on a review of projected undiscounted cash flows associated with these assets. Long-lived assets are included in impairment evaluations when events and circumstances exist that indicate the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Measurement of impairment losses for long-lived assets that our company expects to hold and use is based on the estimated fair value of the assets. Therefore, future changes in our company’s strategy and other changes in our operations could impact the projected future operating results that are inherent in estimates of fair value, resulting in impairments in the future. Additionally, other changes in the estimates and assumptions, including the discount rate and expected long-term growth rate, which drive the valuation techniques employed to estimate the fair value of long-lived assets could change and, therefore, impact the assessments of impairment in the future.

Our company performs certain credit evaluation procedures and does not require collateral for financial instruments subject to credit risk. We believe that credit risk is limited because our company routinely assesses the financial strength of our customers and, based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of our customers, we establish an allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts receivable. As a consequence, we believe that our accounts receivable credit risk exposure beyond such allowances is limited. We recognize an allowance for doubtful accounts to ensure accounts receivable are not overstated due to uncollectibility and are maintained for all customers based on a variety of factors, including the length of time the receivables are past due, significant one-time events and historical experience. An additional reserve for individual accounts is recorded when our company becomes aware of a customer’s inability to meet its financial obligation, such as in the case of bankruptcy filings or deterioration in the customer’s operating results or financial position. If circumstances related to customers change, estimates of the recoverability of receivables would be further adjusted.

Periodic changes occur in our company’s industry and business that make it reasonably likely that aspects of our future operating results will be materially different from our historical operating results. Sometimes these matters have not occurred, but their existence is sufficient to raise doubt regarding the likelihood that historical operating results are an accurate gauge of future performance. We attempt to identify and describe these trends, events, and uncertainties to assist investors in assessing the likely future performance of our company. Investors should understand that these matters typically are new, sometimes unforeseen, and often are fluid in nature. Moreover, the matters described below are not the only issues that may result in variances between past and future performance nor are they necessarily the only material trends, events, and uncertainties that will affect our company. As a result, investors are encouraged to use this and other information to judge for themselves the likelihood that past performance will be indicative of future performance.

We are building an LED out-of-home advertising network in the PRC, Hong Kong and other areas of Asia. Following the acquisition of Lightscape Technologies (Macau) Limited (“Lightscape Macau”) in 2006, our company entered the LED solutions business, which includes the design, supply and building of LED systems, OEM and licensing of our proprietary intelligent lighting control software, and rental of LED hardware. Our current business strategy is focused on (i) building and expanding our LED out-of-home advertising network through installations we complete and operate independently, through existing partnerships and by establishing new partnerships with major property owners and developers in Asia, (ii) establishing advertising sales channels for our LED out-of-home advertising network by forming strategic partnerships with advertising agencies and other media industry partners and (iii) growing sales from our LED solutions business, primarily our LED systems segment, through design, supply and build contracts with high-end real estate developments in China, Hong Kong, Singapore and other areas of Asia. The future performance of these specific business segments may materially affect the future performance of our company. Our company continues to develop, manufacture and sell lighting source products. However, we are reviewing our plans and strategic options related to this business unit.

Recent disruptions in financial markets and challenging economic conditions may adversely affect our business. Firstly, we depend to a large extent on outside capital over the near-term to fund our capital needs. Disruptions in financial markets have reduced the general availability of both equity capital and debt financing. If we are unable to obtain financing in the amounts and on terms deemed acceptable to us, we may be unable to implement our business and growth strategies or withstand adverse operating results. Secondly, the disruptions in the financial markets and challenging economic conditions have reduced spending by businesses. Our operating

results in one or more segments may be adversely affected by these slowing economic conditions and spending patterns. If global economic and market conditions remain uncertain or persist, spread, or deteriorate further, we may experience material impacts on our business, operating results, and financial condition. Lastly, in times of economic slowdown, the number of our customers who default on payments owed to us may increase. We could experience longer payment cycles, increased collection costs and higher bad debt expenses. Additionally, to the degree that the ongoing turmoil in the credit markets makes it more difficult for some customers to obtain financing, those customers’ ability to pay could be adversely impacted, which in turn could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Total net revenue for the year ended March 31, 2009 was $5,620,360, which represents a 6% decrease from the total net revenue of $5,962,411 for the year ended March 31, 2008.

Net loss for the year ended March 31, 2009 was $4,583,250 compared to a net loss of $ 9,416,075 for the year ended March 31, 2008.

Basic and fully diluted loss per share for the year ended March 31, 2009 was $0.08 compared to a basic and fully diluted loss per share of $0.22 for the year ended March 31, 2008.

Our net loss for the year ended March 31, 2009 was $4,583,250 compared to a net loss of $9,416,075 for the year ended March 31, 2008, or an improvement of 51%.

Total net revenue for the year ended March 31, 2009 was $5,620,360, representing a 6% decrease from the total net revenue of $5,962,411 for the year ended March 31, 2008. The decrease in net revenues is primarily attributable to the decrease in revenue from our non-core businesses, primarily our HID lighting products business.

Specifically, revenue related to our LED out-of-home advertising business remained at $nil for the year ended March 31, 2009 as compared to from $nil during the year ended March 31, 2008. Our LED out-of-home advertising business is expected to contribute increased revenues in the foreseeable future as we ramp up several key LED billboard installations which were completed during the year ended March 31, 2009 and are expected to begin generating advertising revenue in the near future. Our company has formed strategic partnerships with Ogilvy & Mather Group, a major advertising agency in Hong Kong, and LIME, a diversified media conglomerate, to sell advertising space on our LED billboards. We are also in the process of negotiating strategic partnership agreements and contracts with other advertising agencies and advertisers for the sales of advertising space on the LED billboard network.

Revenue related to our LED solutions business increased to $4,046,490 for the year ended March 31, 2009 from $3,564,537 during the year ended March 31, 2008, or an increase of 14%. The increase in revenues was due primarily to the completion of more LED solutions contracts during the year ended March 31, 2009 as compared to a smaller number of contracts completed during the year ended Marc 31, 2008. Our LED solutions business is expected to contribute increased revenues in the foreseeable future as several key projects are expected to be initiated in the near future.

Sales from our other business, which includes our HID lighting products business, were $1,573,870 for the year ended March 31, 2009 compared to $2,397,874 for the year ended March 31, 2008, representing a decrease of 34%. The decrease in revenues from our other businesses was due primarily to a decrease in revenue from sales of HID lighting products by our subsidiary Beijing Illumination. The decrease in sales by Beijing Illumination was due primarily to the scaling back of overall operations, including reducing production lines, production shifts and personnel, in order to focus on our company’s core LED out-of-home advertising and LED solutions businesses.

Sales and revenue were also lower due to transport restrictions in Beijing for approximately one month surrounding the Beijing Olympics, which reduced flows of raw materials transported to and finished goods shipped from our Beijing factory. We are currently reviewing our plans and strategic options related to our HID lighting products business.

Total cost of revenues for the year ended March 31, 2009 was $3,702,332, which represents a decrease of 21% as compared to total cost of revenues of $4,694,766 for the year ended March 31, 2008. The decrease in the total cost of revenues during the year ended March 31, 2009 was due in part to the 6% decrease in sales revenues, but also decreased due to improved cost control related to our LED solutions business, namely supplies of LED modules and video screens, and a higher portion of LED consultancy income which is of a higher profit margin. The lower costs of supplies are a result of general technological improvements and economies of scale in the manufacture of LED hardware by our OEM suppliers, and our ability to secure supply contracts on more favorable terms. As a result, our gross profit margin improved to 34% for the year ended March 31, 2009 as compared to 21% for the year ended March 31, 2008.

Operating expenses for the year ended March 31, 2009 were $7,203,033, which represents a 5% increase in operating expenses over $6,834,588 for the year ended March 31, 2008. Selling and marketing expenses, general and administrative expenses, amortization of intangible assets and bad debts constitute the main components of our operating expenses.

Selling and marketing expenses for the year ended March 31, 2009 increased approximately 5% to $698,116 from $662,628 for the year ended March 31, 2008. The increase was mainly due to higher marketing expenses associated with our attendance and booths at the Hong Kong International Lighting Fair 2008 held in October 2008 as compared to our attendance in October 2007, increased staff costs incurred in order to build up our project pipeline of LED solutions contracts, and to establish our sales network for our LED out-of-home advertising business. Our company anticipates that selling and marketing expenses will remain steady or increase in the future to support our company’s further expansion in our core LED out-of-home advertising and LED solutions businesses, however, such increases are expected to be limited as a result of a company-wide cost-cutting initiative implemented in January 2009.

General and administrative expenses increased by 15% during the year ended March 31, 2009 to $4,070,944 from $3,526,970 for the year ended March 31, 2008. The increase was mainly due to increased staff, accounting, investor relations, public relations and business development costs for the year ended March 31, 2009 to provide the foundation to support our anticipated overall business growth, particularly our LED out-of-home advertising and LED solutions businesses. Our company anticipates that general and administrative costs will continue to increase in the foreseeable future as our company’s operations continue to expand, however, such increases are expected to be limited as a result of a company-wide cost-cutting initiative implemented in January 2009.

Our company acquired certain intangible assets through the acquisitions of TFEMS and Beijing Illumination. These intangible assets are comprised of completed technology for the production of AHP lamps, trademarks, a customer base and a distributors list. Amortization of intangible assets incurred for the year ended March 31, 2009 was $758,871 as compared to $749,251 for the year ended March 31, 2008.

Bad debt expenses increased to $1,019,285 during the year ended March 31, 2009 from $414,897 for the year ended March31, 2008. The increase in bad debts was due primarily to the increase in allowance for doubtful accounts of Beijing Illumination. The allowance for doubtful accounts is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing accounts receivable. We determine the allowance based on our historical write-off experience related to accounts receivable.

We received income tax credits of $239,912 during the year ended March 31, 2009 compared to $nil for the year ended March 31, 2008. These tax credits are related primarily to our operations in Macau and arose as a result of the finalization of a Complementary Income Tax assessment as issued by the Macao Finance Service Bureau for

the 2007 assessment year, under which $nil tax is payable as the assessable profits were below the statutory allowance level.

Our principal cash requirements are for operating expenses, including staff costs and funding costs of inventory.

As of March 31, 2009, our company had a net working capital surplus of $6,287,977 compared to a surplus of $11,490,237 as of March 31, 2008, representing a decrease in working capital of $5,202,260. The cash and cash equivalents of our company attributable to continuing operations decreased to $381,643 as at March 31, 2009 as compared to $3,976,565 as of March 31, 2008. Cash attributable to discontinued operations totalled $8,555 and $1,935 for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Operating activities used cash of $2,405,153 for the year ended March 31, 2009 as compared to operating activities using cash of $5,909,210 for the year ended March 31, 2008. The decrease in cash used in operating activities was mainly due to the decrease in net loss for the year ended March 31, 2009 compared to 2008, and a decrease in accounts receivable as we tightened our credit terms and stepped up efforts to collect overdue amounts from clients.

Net cash used in investing activities amounted to $1,788,161 during the year ended March 31, 2009 as compared to investing activities using cash of $269,758 during the year ended March 31, 2008. The increase in cash used in investing activities is attributable primarily to purchases of plant and equipment by Media AV, a Singaporean subsidiary we acquired on July 1, 2008 to support our growing LED solutions business in Singapore, and our company’s purchase of LED out-of-home advertising displays.

Our company incurred capital expenditures of $2,317,378 during the year ended March 31, 2009 and $268,424 for the year ended March 31, 2008. The increase in capital expenditures for the year ended March 31, 2009 as compared to March 31, 2008 was mainly attributable to increased purchases of LED out-of-home advertising displays and plant and equipment by Media AV and Lightscape Technologies (Greater Chinas) Ltd. As of March 31, 2009, our company did not have any material commitments for capital expenditures and management does not anticipate that our company will spend additional material amounts on capital expenditures in the near future.

Financing activities generated cash of $759,141 for the year ended March 31, 2009 as compared to financing activities generating cash of $6,029,618 for the year ended March 31, 2008. The decrease in net cash flow generated by financing activities was mainly due to the completion of a $7,500,000 private placement during the year ended March 31, 2008 with no comparable capital raising transaction completed during the year ended March 31, 2009.

During the year ended March 31, 2009, our company obtained a short-term loan secured by accounts receivable of Lightscape Macau. This loan commenced on September 29, 2008 with a non-bank financial institution at a principal amount of $400,896 with a maturity date of 60 days, which was subsequently extended to 90 days, at an annual interest rate of 10%. This loan was repaid in full on the maturity date of December 29, 2008.

Management believes that additional cash may need to be raised in the next twelve months to finance our existing operations and expansion of our LED out-of-home advertising and LED solutions businesses since we have not yet achieved sustainable positive cash flows. As such, we may need to depend on outside capital over the near-term, including the next twelve months, to fund our capital needs. Such outside capital may be obtained from additional debt or equity financing. We do not currently have any arrangement for financing and there is no assurance that capital will be available to meet our continuing development costs or, if the capital is available, that it will be on terms acceptable to us.

On April 2, 2009, our company, through our wholly-owned subsidiary Lightscape Technologies (Greater China) Limited (“LTGC”), obtained an instalment loan of $771,208 (or HKD6,000,000) from DBS Bank (Hong Kong) Limited (“DBS Bank”) under the Special Loan Guarantee Scheme of The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (“HKSAR Government”). The loan is repayable over 12 equal monthly instalments, at an interest rate of 2% per annum over the prime lending rate, which is currently 5%, from May 12, 2009 to April 12, 2010. The instalment loan is secured by a Special Loan Guarantee issued by the HKSAR Government for an amount equal to 70% of the loan, a Guarantee and Indemnity for an unlimited amount duly executed by a director of our company and a director of LTGC, and a Guarantee and Indemnity for an unlimited amount duly executed by Tech Team Investment Limited, the immediate holding company of LTGC. As of June 30, 2009, 3 out of 12 instalments have been duly repaid to DBS Bank on the respective monthly due dates.

Our company has no outstanding derivative financial instruments, off-balance sheet guarantees, interest rate swap transactions or foreign currency contracts. Our company does not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts.

As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide this information.

The following consolidated financial statements pertaining to our company are filed as part of this annual report:

LIGHTSCAPE TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
AND
REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Lightscape Technologies Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders' equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2009. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lightscape Technologies Inc. and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2009 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2009 in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lightscape Technologies Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of March 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of (operations) income, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years then ended. The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lightscape Technologies Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(i) Includes depreciation of plant and equipment of $288,916 and $243,197 for the year ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 respectively.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

Lightscape Technologies Inc. (“Lightscape” or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada. On April 20, 2007, the Company changed its name from Global Innovative System Inc. to Lightscape Technologies Inc. The Company is a holding company, and together with its subsidiaries (the “Group”) is principally engaged in three business activities: (i) light-emitting diode (“LED”) out-of-home (“OOH”) advertising, (ii) LED solutions and (iii) others including lighting source products.

Pursuant to a Sale and Purchase Agreement (“S&P Agreement”) dated July 1, 2008 between Tech Team Investment Limited (“Tech Team Investment”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and Mr. Yeung Wang Hung (the “Vendor”), sole shareholder of Golden Cypress Limited (“Golden Cypress”), the Company acquired 100% of the equity interest of Golden Cypress at a consideration of $128,535 (or HK$1,000,000). Golden Cypress is a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, which holds a 100% equity interest in Media AV International Pte Limited (“Media AV”), a company incorporated in Singapore. Media AV operates an LED solutions business, including rentals and permanent installations, in Singapore.

The purchase price has been allocated as follows based on the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of acquisition:

Total consideration of $128,535 was prepaid on December 10, 2007 and included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in previous periods.

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, the excess of net assets over the purchase consideration has been allocated on a pro rata basis to all acquired assets except financial assets. Net book value of plant and equipment immediately after the allocation was $4,273.

The results of operations of Golden Cypress have been included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2009 from the date of acquisition.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

Pro forma information as required by SFAS 141 is not presented because the results of operations of Golden Cypress for the first three months of the year ended March 31, 2009 and the full year ended March 31, 2008 are immaterial.

Pursuant to a supplementary agreement dated July 2, 2008 between Golden Cypress Limited and Mr. Choong Yip Weng, as an addendum to the S&P Agreement as mentioned above, Mr. Choong, director of Media AV, thereby warranted that Media AV will achieve at least break even in its operating results (“break-even guarantee”) for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. Golden Cypress may exercise its right under the break-even guarantee provision by offsetting any amounts owed to Mr. Choong in the books of Media AV or any other subsidiaries of the Company. Accordingly, the net loss of $280,630 of Media AV for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 has been accounted for as other income of $280,630 for the year ended March 31, 2009 and set off against the amount owed by Media AV to Mr. Choong of $180,640 and the shortfall of $99,990 has been accounted for as other receivable and included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets as of March 31, 2009.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Group are stated in United States dollars and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and include the financial statements of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated on consolidation.

The accompanying audited consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and with the instructions to Form 10-K and Regulation S-X applicable to smaller reporting companies. In the opinion of management, these audited consolidated financial statements include all adjustments considered necessary to make the financial statements not misleading.

Certain of the 2008 comparative figures have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on previously reported financial positions, results of operations or cash flows.

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and demand deposits which are unrestricted as to withdrawal and use, and which have maturities of three months or less when purchased. Cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2009 and 2008 of $381,643 and $3,976,565, respectively, consist of cash on hand and current accounts and savings accounts with respective banks, without any time or demand deposits.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

The Company performs certain credit evaluation procedures and does not require collateral for financial instruments subject to credit risk. The Company believes that credit risk is limited because the Company routinely assesses the financial strength of its customers and, based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of its customers, establishes an allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable. As a consequence, the Company believes that its accounts receivable credit risk exposure beyond such allowances is limited. The Company recognizes an allowance for doubtful accounts to ensure accounts receivable are not overstated due to uncollectibility and are maintained for all customers based on a variety of factors, including the length of time the receivables are past due, significant onetime events and historical experience. An additional reserve for individual accounts is recorded when the Company becomes aware of a customer’s inability to meet its financial obligation, such as in the case of bankruptcy filings or deterioration in the customer’s operating results or financial position. If circumstances related to customers change, estimates of the recoverability of receivables would be further adjusted. As of March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, the allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $1,287,843 and $817,800, respectively.

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined on the first-in, first-out basis. Write-down of potentially obsolete or slow-moving inventory is recorded based on management’s analysis of inventory levels and the Company’s assessment of estimated obsolescence based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Further write-down of the value may be required in the future if there is rapid technological and structural change in the industry. This may reduce the results of operations of the Company.

The Company accounts for acquisitions of business in accordance with SFAS No. 141 “Business Combinations”, which results in the recognition of goodwill when the purchase price exceeds the fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill is not subject to amortization but will be subject to periodic evaluation for impairment. Goodwill is stated in the consolidated balance sheet at cost less accumulated impairment loss (see Note 10).

The Company acquired certain intangible assets through the acquisition of subsidiaries. These intangible assets are comprised of trademarks, customer lists and relationships, unfulfilled purchase orders, completed technology for the production of Aihua Ultra-High Pressure Mercury (“AHP”) lamps and High Intensity Discharge (“HID”) lamps, a customer base and a distributor base. The acquired trademarks were determined to have indefinite useful lives which are not subject to amortization, unless and until the useful lives are determined to no longer be indefinite.

The estimation of the useful lives of the trademarks, completed technologies for the production of AHP and HID, distributor base, customer lists and relationships are affected by factors such as a change in demand, unanticipated competition change in technology, legislative action that results in an uncertain or an adverse change in the regulatory environment or changes in distribution channels and business climate.

Software and licenses are recognized as intangible assets at cost less accumulated amortization. These assets are generally amortized over three years.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

The Company reviews long-lived assets for potential impairment based on a review of projected undiscounted cash flows associated with these assets. Long-lived assets are included in impairment evaluations when events and circumstances exist that indicate the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Measurement of impairment losses for long-lived assets that the Company expects to hold and use is based on the estimated fair value of the assets. Therefore, future changes in the Company’s strategy and other changes in its operations could impact the projected future operating results that are inherent in estimates of fair value, resulting in impairments in the future. Additionally, other changes in the estimates and assumptions, including the discount rate and expected long-term growth rate, which drive the valuation techniques employed to estimate the fair value of long-lived assets could change and, therefore, impact the assessments of impairment in the future (see Note 10).

Plant and equipment is recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Estimated useful lives of equipment are as follows:

Construction in progress is stated at cost which comprises all direct costs incurred in relation to the construction.

The cost of construction in progress will not be depreciated until the construction is completed and the assets are transferred to a specific category of plant and equipment and put into service.

Expenditures for repairs, maintenance and minor renewals and betterments are expensed as incurred.

Deferred costs relates to costs which enable OOH advertising LED display and equipment to operate and commence its income generating activities, however, the costs cannot be capitalized because they are not directly related to bringing the equipment to its existing condition and location. Examples are licence fee for OOH advertising and prepaid rental. The costs incurred are initially recorded as a deferred cost within the non-current assets section of the balance sheet, and the deferred costs are subsequently recorded as a cost of sales when the Company recognizes revenue for the related OOH advertising revenue, in accordance with the matching principle.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

At the time a sales-type lease is consummated, the Company records the gross finance receivable, less unearned income. Unearned income is recognized as lease income using the interest method over the term of the lease and is included as financing revenue in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The Company reviews minimum lease payments receivable for collectability on a periodic basis. The review consists primarily of an analysis based upon current information available about the customer as well as the current economic environment, value of leased assets net of repossession cost and prior history. Impairment is measured using the fair value of the leased assets when foreclosure is probable. Using this information, the Company determines the expected cash flow for the receivable and calculates a recommended estimate of the potential loss and the probability of loss. For those accounts in which the loss is probable, the Company records a specific reserve.

The Company recognizes revenue when it has persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the product has been delivered and installed or the services have been provided to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. In addition to the aforementioned general policy, the following are specific revenue recognition policies for each major category of revenue.

Advertising – LED related Out-of-Home (“OOH”) advertising revenue from advertising services, net of agency rebates and commissions, is recognized ratably over the period in which the advertisement is displayed. Prepayments for the advertising services are deferred and recognized as revenue when the advertising services are rendered.

LED solutions - The Company sells its products directly to end users and through distributors. Revenue is recognized when the product is delivered to the customer and all other revenue recognition criteria are met. Revenues for LED solutions activities provided on a “supply and build basis” and for consultancy services for which the revenue generation process lasts for several months are recognized on the percentage-of-completion method, measured either by the ratio of costs incurred up to a given date to estimated total costs for each contract, or by an assessment from a quantity surveyor as appointed by our customers.

Contract costs include all direct material, direct labor, subcontracting and other costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect salaries and wages, equipment repairs and depreciation, insurance and payroll taxes. Administrative and general expenses are charged to expense as incurred. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. Changes in job performance, job conditions and estimated profitability, including those changes arising from contract penalty provisions and final contract settlements may result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. An amount attributable to contract claims is included in revenues when realization is probable and the amount can be reliably estimated. The Company generally provides a one-year warranty for workmanship under its contracts. Warranty claims historically have been inconsequential.

Others – This includes sales of lighting source products, rental income, commission and service income and sales-type lease income.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

Regarding sales of lighting source products, the Company sells its products directly to end users and through distributors. Revenue is recognized when the product is delivered to the customer and all other revenue recognition criteria are met. Revenue from rentals and operating leases without any acceptance provisions is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the rental or lease. Revenue regarding commission and service income is recognized when services are rendered. Revenue from sales-type leases is recognized over the term of the lease, using the effective interest method.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases as well as operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 is intended to clarify the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements and prescribes the recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

Under FIN 48, it is a two-step process for valuation of a tax position. Step one is to determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of any related appeals or litigation based on the technical merits of that position. Step two is to measure a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not threshold to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in the financial statements. A tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.

Tax positions that previously failed to meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be recognized in the first subsequent period in which the threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more-likely-than-not criteria should be de-recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which the threshold is no longer met.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

The functional currency of the Company is Hong Kong dollars (“HKD”). Transactions in other currencies are recorded in HKD at the rates of exchange prevailing when the transactions occur. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in other currencies are measured in HKD at rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet dates. Exchange gains and losses are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations as a component of current period earnings.

For financial reporting purposes, the financial statements of the Company which are prepared using the functional currency have been translated into United States dollars. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates at the balance sheet dates and revenue and expenses are translated at the average exchange rate for the period and stockholders’ equity is translated at historical exchange rates. Any translation adjustments resulting from the translation are included in foreign currency translation adjustment in accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders’ equity.

The Company’s segment reporting is prepared in accordance with SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” (“SFAS 131”). The management approach required by SFAS 131 requires that the internal reporting structure used by management for making operating decisions and assessing performance be used as the source for presenting the Group’s reportable segments.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, short-term debt and trade payables approximate their fair values due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. The fair value of long-term debts and capital lease obligations approximate their carrying values based on interest rates currently available to the Company.

Comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners.

The Company adopted SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”) using the modified prospective method. Under SFAS 123R, equity instruments issued to employees for their services are measured at the grant-date fair value and recognized in the statement of operations over the service period.

The Company accounts for stock options and stock issued to non-employees for goods or services in accordance with the fair value method of SFAS 123R, which recognizes the value of such services at the fair value of the equity instrument or of the goods or services, whichever is more readily determinable.

The Company reports basic earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share”. Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the periods presented. The weighted average number of shares of the Company represents the common stock outstanding during the period.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

Diluted earnings per share is based on the assumption that if there is no anti-dilutive effect on the basic earnings per share, all dilutive convertible notes, options and warrants were converted or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under this method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the year (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period.

Effective April 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 clarifies the definition of fair value, prescribes methods for measuring fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy to classify the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1-Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities available at the measurement date.

Level 2-Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other then quoted prices that are observable, and inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3-Inputs are unobservable inputs which reflect the reporting entity's own assumptions on what assumptions the market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best available information.

The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on our fair value measurements as the Company does not have any balance sheet components deemed financial assets or liabilities.

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense for the year ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $98,855 and $51,413 respectivly.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 115-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments” (“FSP 115-2”), which was to make the guidance on other-than-temporary impairment more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. It requires significant additional disclosures for both annual and interim periods, including the amortized cost basis of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity debt, the methodology and key imports used to measure the credit portion of other-than-temporary impairment, and a roll forward of amounts recognized in earnings for securities by major security type. FSP 115-2 makes amendment to SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” (“SFAS 115”) and FSP No. 115-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments” to require entities identifying major security classes to be consistent with how the securities are managed based on the nature and risks of the security, and also expands, for disclosure purposes, the list of major security types identified in SFAS 115. FSP 115-2 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company’s management does not believe that the adoption of this pronouncement will have a material impact on its financial statements.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly” (“FSP 157-4”), which provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with FASB Statement No. 157 when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased and also provides guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP 157-4 amends SFAS No. 157 to require entities to disclose in interim and annual periods the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value together with any changes in valuation techniques and related inputs during the period. FSP 157-4 also requires reporting entities to define major categories for both debt and equity securities to be major security types as described in paragraph 19 of SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”. This requires entities to provide disclosures on a more disaggregated basis than previously had been required under SFAS No. 157. FSP 157-4 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. The Company’s management does not believe that the adoption of this pronouncement will have a material impact on its financial statements.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP 142-3”). It amends the factors an entity should consider in developing renewal or extension assumptions used in determining the useful life of recognized intangible assets under FASB Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. This new guidance applies prospectively to intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets in business combinations and asset acquisitions. FSP 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“SFAS 162”). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of non-governmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. It is effective 60 days following the Securities and Exchange Commission’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) (“SFAS 141R”), “Business Combinations”, which replaces SFAS 141. SFAS 141R retains the purchase method of accounting for acquisitions, but requires a number of changes, including changes in the way assets and liabilities are recognized in purchase accounting. It also changes the recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, requires the capitalization of in-process research and development at fair value, and requires the expensing of acquisition-related costs as incurred. SFAS 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and will apply prospectively to business combinations completed on or after that date. The Company’s management believes that this statement will impact the Company in the event of any future acquisition.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (SFAS No. 160), an amendment of ARB 51, which changes the accounting and reporting for minority interests. Minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and will be reported as a component of equity separate from the parent’s equity, and purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change in control will be accounted for as equity transactions. In addition, net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement and, upon a loss of control, the interest sold, as well as any interest retained, will be recorded at fair value with any gain or loss recognized in earnings. SFAS No. 160 is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning January 1, 2009 and will apply prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which will apply retrospectively. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, including (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company does not expect that the adoption of the pronouncement will have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP Accounting Principles Board Opinions (“APB”) 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments that May be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)” (“FSP APB 14-1” or “the FSP”). The FSP requires cash settled convertible debt to be bifurcated into debt and equity components and accounted for separately at issuance. The value assigned to the debt component would be the estimated fair value, as of the issuance date, of a similar bond without the conversion feature. The difference between the bond cash proceeds and this estimated fair value would be recorded as a debt discount and amortized to interest expense over the life of the bond. The equity component of the convertible debt securities would be included in the paid-in-capital section of shareholders’ equity on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets and the initial carrying values of these debt securities would be correspondingly reduced. Management does not expect that the application of this standard will have any significant effect on the Company’s financial statements.

NOTE 4. COSTS AND ESTIMATED EARNINGS IN EXCESS OF BILLINGS ON UNCOMPLETED CONTRACTS

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

	March 31,	March 31,
	2009	2008
Presented in current assets:	$	$
Trade deposits	51,291	1,546
Rental, utilities and other deposits	380,365	393,373
Prepaid expenses	397,495	863,092
Other receivables	432,182	465,216
Contract surety bond refundable deposit	44,605	-
Other receivable regarding disposal of property, plant and equipment	511,277	-
Others	-	18,804
	1,817,215	1,742,031

Presented in noncurrent assets		-			-
Other receivables		511,277			-

	March 31,		March 31,
	2009		2008
	$		$
Testing equipment	382		-
Office equipment	577,273		666,009
Furniture and fixtures	29,633		16,428
Leasehold improvements	339,018		323,900
Motor vehicles	66,153		56,405
Factory machinery and equipment	3,059,764		5,349,055
Total	4,072,223		6,411,797
Less: Accumulated depreciation	(1,543,082	)	(1,761,399	)
Plant and equipment, net	2,529,141		4,650,398

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

Equipment held under capital leases and included above is summarized as follows:

Goodwill was recognized upon to the acquisition of equity interests in Beijing Illumination (Hong Kong) Limited (“Beijing Illumination”) and Lightscape Technologies (Macau) Limited (“Lightscape Macau”) and represents the costs of the investments over the estimated fair value of the underlying net assets acquired.

Changes to goodwill during the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

The write-down of goodwill of $Nil and $526,863 respectively for the year ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, was based on the discounted cash flows analysis as conducted by the management (“discounted cash flows analysis”) regarding Beijing Illumination for the year ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Management assessed the basis to ascertain the amount of impairment losses on goodwill and intangible assets. The discounted cash flows analysis was carried out on the basis of fair value, which is defined as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date”.

Management takes full responsibility for valuing the assets and the liabilities of the acquired entity, and has carefully reviewed the reasonableness of the basis of valuation, valuation assumptions and valuation methodology, in particular the use of the income approach, which is also known as the discounted cash flow method (“DCF”). The fair value of goodwill and intangible assets were determined by applying a discount rate (the cost of capital) in the DCF model to determine the net present value of our acquired subsidiary’s future expected cash flows.

Intangible assets arise from the acquisition of interests in subsidiaries. The costs of the intangible assets were determined during the allocation of the purchase prices based on the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of acquisition. Acquired intangible assets consist of the following:

	March 31, 2009				March 31, 2008
		Accumulated				Accumulated
		amortization				amortization
		and				and
	Cost	impairment		Net	Cost	impairment		Net
	$	$		$	$	$		$
Subject to amortization
Completed technology – AHP	1,172,616	(1,167,011	)	5,605	1,172,616	(999,494	)	173,122
Completed technology – HID	1,214,012	(920,755	)	293,257	1,214,012	(617,252	)	596,760
Software and license (i)	650,807	(560,805	)	82,431	641,077	(345,101	)	295,976
Customer lists and relationships	45,797	(24,017	)	21,780	45,797	(19,437	)	26,360
Distributors list	179,351	(179,351	)	-	179,351	(137,665	)	41,686
Total	3,262,583	(2,851,939	)	403,073	3,252,853	(2,118,949	)	1,133,904

Not subject to amortization
Trademark	566,209	-		566,209	566,210	-		566,210

Total	3,828,792	(2,851,939	)	969,282	3,819,063	(2,118,949	)	1,700,114

An impairment review regarding intangible assets based on the discounted cash flows analysis, was conducted by the management (“discounted cash flows analysis”) regarding all intangible assets of the Company, including Beijing Illumination, for the year ended March 31, 2009 indicates no impairment loss is required for the year ended March 31, 2009 while impairment loss of $689,204 was accounted for the year ended March 31, 2008.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

Amortization expenses charged to net loss from operations for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were approximately $751,299 and $749,251 respectively. Anticipated amortization expense for each of the following five years is as follows:

Bank borrowings relate to two term loans each borrowed from DBS Bank and OCBC Bank, respectively, by Media AV, with principal of Singapore Dollars (“SGD”) SGD100,000, SGD50,000, SGD50,000 and SGD70,000, or $65,759, $32,880, $32,880 and $46,031, respectively. The commencement dates are April 3, 2007, June 27, 2008, February 1, 2007 and February 19, 2009, respectively. The loans are repayable by 36, 24, 60 and 48 monthly instalments, and incur interest at an annual rate of 12.5%, 12.5%, 13.12% and 13.38%, respectively. These loans are secured by a deed of guarantee and indemnity by a director of Media AV.

The following is a summary of future repayments related to bank borrowings for the next five years:

(i) Equipment relating to a copier machine under hire purchase with obligations under capital leases of $7,243 as of March 31, 2008 has been disposed at a gain on disposal of $2,513 in the year ended March 31, 2009.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

The following is a summary of future minimum lease payments under capital leases as of March 31, 2009:

The Company entered into capital lease arrangements for leasing a second hand truck used in its operations. The lease is for a term of five years. For the year ended March 31, 2009, the capital lease arrangement was on an interest bearing basis. The leases are on a fixed repayment basis and require no contingent rental payments. The interest expenses incurred on these capital leases were $1,230 and $nil for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The other reserves represent the statutory surplus reserve of the Company’s subsidiaries in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”).

In accordance with the relevant laws and regulations of the PRC and the subsidiaries’ articles of association, the subsidiaries are required to appropriate 10% of their net income, after offsetting any prior years’ losses, to the statutory surplus reserve. When the balance of such reserve reaches 50% of the PRC subsidiaries’ share capital, any further appropriation is optional.

The statutory surplus reserve can be used to offset prior years’ losses, if any, and may be converted into share capital by issuing new shares to shareholders in proportion to their existing shareholding or by increasing the par value of the shares currently held by them, provided that the remaining balance of the reserve after such issue is not less than 25% of share capital. The statutory surplus reserve is non-distributable.

Foreign currency transaction losses of $8,323 for the year ended March 31, 2009 and a gain of $19,668 for the year ended March 31, 2008 were included in determining net losses.

Income tax expense for the year ended March 31, 2009 represents the provision for income tax of the subsidiaries operating in Hong Kong, Macau and Mainland PRC which were calculated at the applicable tax rate.

A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes from continuing operations determined at the US statutory corporate income tax rate to the Company’s effective income tax rate is as follows:

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

	2009		2008
	$		$

(Loss) before income tax	(5,029,665	)	(7,274,488	)
US statutory corporate income tax rate	34%		35%
Income tax (benefit) computed at United States
statutory corporate income tax rate	(1,710,086	)	(2,546,071	)
Reconciling items:
Rate differential for Hong Kong earnings	314,573		1,273,035
Rate differential for PRC earnings	108,002		-
Rate differential for Singapore earnings	46,610		-
Tax effect of expenses not deductible for tax purposes	867,917		856,860
Tax effect of income not taxable for tax purposes	(138,961	)	(48,372	)
Loss not recognized as deferred income tax assets	-		437,546
Others	188,862		27,002
Change in valuation allowance	(460,896	)	-

Income tax refund (expense)	(239,911	)	-

For the operating loss carry forwards of approximately $10,859,568 as of March 31, 2009, $1,123,292, $211,696, $298,170, $1,355,302 and $832,003 will expire in 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively, and the remainder of $7,039,105 will be carried forward indefinitely.

As at March 31, 2009, the Company had accumulated net operating loss carryforwards for Hong Kong income tax purposes of approximately $6,621,698 that are available to offset future taxable income. Realization of the net operating loss carryforwards is dependent upon future profitable operations. Accordingly, management has adjusted the valuation allowance during the year ended March 31, 2009 to reduce the deferred tax asset associated with the net operating loss carryforwards to $Nil at March 31, 2009.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

Additionally, as of March 31, 2009, upon expiry of certain net operating loss and adjustment in respect of agreeing with agreed tax losses per Tax Authority of China, the Company had accumulated net operating loss carryforwards for Chinese tax purposes of approximately $492,607. Realization of the Chinese tax net operating loss carryforwards is dependent on future profitable operations, as well as a maximum five-year carryforward period. Accordingly, management has adjusted valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax associated with the net operating loss carryforwards to zero at March 31, 2009. These tax losses yield deferred tax assets of approximately $123,152 as of March 31, 2009.

The components of profit (loss) before income tax and minority interests are as follows:

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

Income tax expense (credit) for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 represents the provision for income tax in the following jurisdictions:

FIN 48 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, by defining a criterion that an individual income tax position must meet for any part of the benefit of that position to be recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements and provides guidance on measurement, derecognition, classification, accounting for interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

The Company recognizes that virtually all tax positions in the jurisdictions in which it operates are not free of some degree of uncertainty due to tax law and policy changes by the state. However, the Company cannot reasonably quantify political risk factors and thus must depend on guidance issued by current state officials.

Based on all known facts and circumstances and current tax law, the Company believes that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2009 is not material to its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. The Company also believes that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2009, if recognized, would not have a material effect on its effective tax rate. The Company further believes that there are no tax positions for which it is reasonably possible, based on current tax law and policy to which we are subject, that the unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease over the next 12 months producing, individually or in the aggregate, a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

The Company accounts for its discontinued operations under the provisions of SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”). Accordingly, the results of operations and the related charges for discontinued operations have been classified as “(Loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes” on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. Assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations have been reclassified and reflected on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as “Current assets of discontinued operations” and “Current liabilities of discontinued operations”. For comparative purposes, all prior periods presented have been restated to reflect the reclassifications on a consistent basis.

During the year ended March 31, 2008, in order to more effectively utilize the financial and other resources within other business units, including the LED out-of-home advertising business and LED solutions business, the Company decided to exit the energy-savings solutions business. No further energy-savings products will be developed, nor will the Company provide further energy management consulting services.

Remaining assets of the energy savings segment include only certain receivables and lease receivables less unearned interests under sales-type leases. Except for the collection of these receivables, the Company will no longer have any significant continuing involvement in the energy-savings segment. Therefore, the energy savings segment has been classified as discontinued operations in accordance with SFAS 144.

Furthermore, the Company has determined to dispose of construction in progress that was to be used for the production of a proposed product line of its lighting source business. This asset has been stated at fair value less costs to sell and is included with current assets of discontinued operations on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Revenues and net profit (loss) from discontinued operations of the energy savings business and disposal of construction in progress is as follows:

As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company has a credit risk exposure of uninsured cash in banks of $51,707 (including cash of discontinued operations of $8,555) and $3,928,790, respectively. The Company does not require collateral or other securities to support financial instruments that are subject to credit risk.

Subsequent to the measures taken by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority on October 14, 2008 to use the Exchange Fund to guarantee the repayment of all customer deposits held in Authorised Financial Institutions in Hong Kong, following the principles of the existing Deposit Protection Scheme, assurance is made to depositors that their money is fully protected. Hence, cash of $331,800 (including cash of discontinued operations of $4,048) out of a total of $390,198 (including cash of discontinued operations of $8,555) of the Company’s cash held with banks in Hong Kong is now subject to no credit risk.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

On October 16, 2008, the Singapore government announced a guarantee on deposits of individual and non-bank customers in banks, financial companies and merchant banks in Singapore until year-end 2010. The guarantee is backed by $100 billion (SGD $150 billion) of Singapore government reserves. Hence, all of the Company’s cash held with banks in Singapore amounting to $6,265 is now subject to no credit risk.

The Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts primarily based upon the age of the receivables and factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers.

For the year ended March 31, 2009, one customer accounted for approximately 20.1% of the Company’s total revenues. As of March 31, 2009, there is one customer whose account receivable to the Company accounted for 19.1% of total accounts receivable.

The Company relies on supplies from numerous vendors. For the year ended March 31, 2009, one vendor accounted for approximately 17.9% of total supply purchases.

The Company’s business, assets and operations are currently focused on the LED out-of-home advertising business and the sales of LED solutions and specialty lighting source products in Hong Kong, China, Singapore and Macau, and accordingly, are affected to a significant degree by any economic, political and legal developments in those regions.

The Company has operating lease agreements principally for its office facilities and factory buildings. Such leases have remaining terms of approximately 0.50 to 2.30 years. The following is a summary of future minimum lease payments under operating leases as of March 31, 2009. Rental expense was $336,434 and $264,234 for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Pursuant to a supplier agreement (the “Agreement”) dated March 8, 2006, entered into between Beijing Illumination and an independent third party, the independent third party appointed Beijing Illumination as a non-exclusive licensed OEM manufacturer with rights to make and distribute certain products worldwide. Beijing Illumination shall pay to the independent third party, during the term of the Agreement, 7% of gross revenues of certain products sold to customers or distributors other than this independent third party. Such royalty payments shall survive for five years after the termination of the Agreement. No such royalty payment was accounted for or paid during the year ended March 31, 2009.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

In 2004, the Company acquired Tomi Fuji Energy Management Services Limited (“TFEMS”) by issuing shares of its own stock to TFEMS’ holding company, Tomi Fuji Corporation Limited (“TFCL”). The owner of TFCL guaranteed certain net profits of TFEMS for the period from the date of acquisition in early January 2005 to June 30, 2005 (“the guaranteed period”). TFEMS’ net profits during the guarantee period fell short of the guaranteed amount by approximately $605,000. Management is considering taking appropriate actions to recoup the damages thereon from the guarantor.

The Company acquired Lightscape Macau in 2006 by payment of $1,550 (Macau Pataca (“MOP”) MOP12,400) and issuance of 1,200,000 shares of the Company upon the condition that Lightscape Macau would make a net profit of not less than $2,564,103 (HK$20,000,000) for the period from October 1, 2006 to September 30, 2007 (“the guarantee period”). Lightscape Macau had a loss during the guaranteed period and management is taking action to cancel the 1,200,000 shares issued.

The amounts due to a director and a director of a subsidiary represent cash advances from them and are unsecured, non-interest bearing and have no fixed repayment terms. The balances related to such advances are as follows:

The Company is engaged in three main business segments: (i) LED out-of-home advertising, (ii) LED solutions and (iii) others including lighting source products. These represent the Company’s reportable segments.

The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as those described in the Summary of Principal Accounting Policies (see Note 3). The Company evaluates performance based on profit or loss from operations, excluding corporate, general and administrative expenses.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

	Year Ended March 31,
	2009	2008
	$	$
Segment assets:
Advertising	3,856,166	-
LED solutions	7,476,596	17,333,269
Other	8,605,133	8,193,453
	19,937,895	25,526,722
Assets of discontinued operations	619,665	826,368
	20,557,560	26,353,090

Capital expenditure:
Advertising	1,575,671	-
LED solutions	738,186	253,291
Other	3,521	15,133
	2,317,378	268,424

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

One customer accounts for 28.3% and 48.5% of operating revenue of the LED solutions segment for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 respectively, while none of the customers of the other segments accounts for more than 10% of operating revenue for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

In connection with the placement of 9,375,000 shares completed on March 17, 2008, the Company issued warrants to Roth Capital Partners, LLC, the placement agent, to purchase up to 656,250 shares of the Company’s common stock (representing 7% of the shares placed) as compensation for its placement services. The warrants have a term of five years, are exercisable immediately upon issuance and have an exercise price of $0.80 per share.

The warrants have been accounted for as common stock warrants at fair value in the amount of $344,673, which forms part of shareholder’s equity, with the corresponding charge debited directly to additional paid-in capital, for the year ended March 31, 2008. The valuation of the warrants was performed by management in accordance with Generally Accepted Valuation Methodologies, including but not limited to, the discounted cash flow method, the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model, and the Binomial option model, as required by SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) “Share-Based Payment” issued by the FASB.

The following key valuation parameters have been used in assessing the fair value of the warrants:

On January 23, 2007, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the subscription agreements, the Company issued 60 $100,000 redeemable convertible notes in an aggregate principal amount of $6,000,000 to three investors consisting of Investec Bank (UK) Limited (“Investec Bank”), Full Moon Resources Limited (“Full Moon Resources”) and LP Asset Management Limited (“LP Asset Management”).

Each note bears a fixed rate of interest at 10% per annum, payable quarterly, calculated on a 360 day year on the principal amount outstanding. Unless previously converted or redeemed, each note will be redeemed by the Company on the maturity date of December 31, 2009 at a final redemption amount, calculated in accordance with a formula set out in the note, together with all interest thereon. The notes are convertible into common shares at the rate of one common share per each $0.55 of principal converted (subject to adjustment as described in the subscription agreements).

In addition, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the subscription agreements, the Company granted two options to each investor to purchase additional redeemable convertible notes of the Company in the aggregate amount of $12,000,000, the first option (“First Option”) of which is exercisable at any time during the period from April 1, 2007 to June 30, 2008. The first option entitles the holder to subscribe for additional $100,000 redeemable convertible notes of the Company in the aggregate principal amount of up to $6,000,000. The second option (“Second Option”), which is exercisable on July 1, 2008, January 1, 2009 and July 1, 2009, or as otherwise described in the subscription agreements, entitles the holder to subscribe for additional $100,000 redeemable convertible notes of the Company in the aggregate principal amount of up to $6,000,000. The conversion price of the notes underlying the first option are convertible at $0.55 per share if converted on or before June 30, 2007 and at $0.66 per share if converted after June 30, 2007. The conversion price of the notes underlying the second option is subject to a formula as set out in the subscription agreements.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

The fair value of the First Option was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, based on the following assumptions:

Expected volatilities were calculated using the historical prices of the Company’s common stock. The expected term of first option was based on the term of the exercisable periods. The risk-free interest rates were based on the U.S. Treasury Note rate with terms comparable with the first option.

The fair value of Second Option was not determinable due to the high dependence on the future performance and future number of shares of the Company caused no reasonable basis for the valuation of the Second Option.

The following table summarizes the accounting for the redeemable convertible notes as of March 31, 2007:

On July 10, 2007, the Company entered into a redemption agreement (“Redemption Agreement”) with Investec Bank, Full Moon Resources, LP Asset Management and Bondy Tan, whereby the Company agreed to redeem the convertible notes in the principal amount of $6,000,000 plus pay all accrued interest on such notes.

On August 20, 2007, the Company completed the convertible note redemption transaction. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Redemption Agreement, the Company completed the repayment of the redeemable convertible notes in the aggregate principal amount of $6,000,000 to Investec Bank, Full Moon Resources and LP Asset Management, plus all accrued interest thereon. Following receipt, the notes were immediately cancelled by the Company. Pursuant to the terms of the Redemption Agreement, the options to purchase up to $12,000,000 additional redeemable convertible notes of the Company were also cancelled.

The notes were discounted for the fair value of options, pursuant to APB 14 “Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants”. The notes were further discounted for the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature, pursuant to EITF 98-5 “Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios.” The discount is being amortized over the life of the notes. Through date of redemption, $199,721 was amortized and recorded as part of interest expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

At redemption of the convertible notes, a value of $1,752,600 was allocated to the First Option based on its intrinsic value estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, resulting in a gain of $866,400 on changes in the fair value of the First Option from April 1, 2007 through redemption. The following assumptions were used in estimating the intrinsic value of the First Option at date of redemption using the Black-Scholes option pricing model:

Portion of the redemption price, measured as the intrinsic value of $1,647,273 of the beneficial conversion feature at the redemption date, has been allocated to the beneficial conversion feature. The cancellation of this beneficial conversion feature, which was originally recognized as equity, has been considered an adjustment within stockholders’ equity with reference to EITF98-5 and EITF00-27. The remaining portion of $2,253,359 of the redemption price less the aggregate carrying value of the convertible note and First Option at the redemption date has been recognized as a loss on extinguishment of debts in accordance with SFAS 140 and APB 26.

The Company operates a Mandatory Provident Fund (“MPF”) plan for its Hong Kong employees. The pension expenses charged to the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss amounted to $44,365 and $22,052 for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

As stipulated by the PRC regulations, all retired employees of the Group who are residents of the PRC are entitled to an annual pension equal to their basic annual salary upon retirement. The Group contributed to a state-sponsored retirement plan at a certain percentage of the gross salary of its employees and has no further obligations for the actual pension payments or post-retirement benefits beyond the annual contributions. The state-sponsored retirement plan is responsible for the entire pension obligations payable to all employees. The pension expense for the year ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $29,433 and $21,255 respectively.

The Central Provident Fund (“CPF”) of Singapore is a social security savings scheme jointly supported by employees, employers, and the Government. The pension expenses charged to the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss amounted to $29,697 for the year ended March 31, 2009.

NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008

On April 2, 2009, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Lightscape Technologies (Greater China) Limited (“LTGC”), obtained an instalment loan of $771,208 (or HKD6,000,000) from DBS Bank (Hong Kong) Limited (“DBS Bank”) under the Special Loan Guarantee Scheme of The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (“HKSAR Government”). The loan is repayable over 12 equal monthly instalments, at an interest rate of 2% per annum over the prime lending rate, which is currently 5%, from May 12, 2009 to April 12, 2010. The instalment loan is secured by a Special Loan Guarantee issued by the HKSAR Government for an amount equal to 70% of the loan, a Guarantee and Indemnity for an unlimited amount duly executed by a director of the Company and a director of LTGC, and a Guarantee and Indemnity for an unlimited amount duly executed by Tech Team Investment Limited, the immediate holding company of LTGC. As of June 30, 2009, 3 out of 12 instalments had been duly repaid to DBS Bank on the respective monthly due dates.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

We engaged the firm of MSPC Certified Public Accountants and Advisors, P.C. as our principal independent accountant on July 25, 2008. Other than as described below, there has been no change in the accountants and no disagreements with MSPC Certified Public Accountants and Advisors, P.C. on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope procedure.

On May 30, 2007, we dismissed Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP, Chartered Accountants, as our principal independent accountant, and on May 31, 2007, we engaged Yu and Associates CPA Corporation as our principal independent accountant, as reported on our current report on Form 8-K/A filed on June 5, 2007.

On July 25, 2008, we dismissed Yu and Associates CPA Corporation as our principal independent accountant, and on July 25, 2008, we engaged MSPC Certified Public Accountants and Advisors, P.C. as our principal independent accountant, as reported on our current report on Form 8-K filed on July 31, 2008.

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, being March 31, 2009, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our company’s disclosure controls and procedures. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our company’s management, including our company’s Chief Executive Officer. Based upon that evaluation, our company’s Chief Executive Officer concluded that our company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2009. There has been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.

Disclosure controls and procedures and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time period specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate control over financial reporting. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of March 31, 2009.

Our company’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, does not expect that our company’s disclosure controls and procedures or our company’s internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of the controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit our company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

All directors of our company hold office until the next annual meeting of the stockholders or until their successors have been elected and qualified. The officers of our company are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until their death, resignation or removal from office. Our directors and executive officers, their ages, positions held, and duration as such, are as follows:

Name	Position Held with the Company	Age	Date First Elected or Appointed
Bondy Tan	Director, President, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Executive Officer of our company	42	January 13, 2005
Aaron Ratner	Chief Strategic Officer	34	December 1, 2008
Charles Cheung	Director	73	January 13, 2005
Edmand Yuk Man Wong⁽¹⁾	Director	52	June 5, 2006
Kwok Tin Tang⁽¹⁾	Director	58	June 5, 2006
Alfred Lee Ming Sung⁽¹⁾	Director	51	May 15, 2009
Francis Man Chung Wong⁽²⁾	Former Director	44	August 1, 2007

⁽¹⁾Members of the Audit Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Compensation Committee.

The following is a brief account of the education and business experience of each director and executive officer during at least the past five years, indicating each person’s principal occupation during the period, and the name and principal business of the organization by which he or she was employed.

Bondy Tan is a director and the President, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Executive Officer of our company and is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Tech Team and Tech Team Development Limited. From October 1999 to present, Mr. Tan has served as the Chief Executive Officer and a director of Tech Team Development Limited. Mr. Tan incorporated Tech Team Development Limited and has led its development and growth over the past five years. From February 2002 to present, Mr. Tan has served as the Chief Executive Officer and a director of Tech Team. In these roles, Mr. Tan is responsible for the overall management and strategic planning for Tech Team and its subsidiaries. Mr. Tan’s experience includes an additional 10 years of marketing management and business development roles in China and Hong Kong. His former positions include Marketing and Sales Coordinator for Sony (Hong Kong), where he was responsible for advertising, promotion and sales activities for Sony in China and Hong Kong. Mr. Tan also held several roles with Caltex, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Chevron-Texaco Corporation, in China and Hong Kong. In these positions, Mr. Tan rebuilt Caltex’s corporate

image, developed brand awareness in China, led the formation of two joint venture projects and managed the operation of 51 service stations in Hong Kong. Mr. Tan holds a Bachelor of Commerce, with a major in company law, from Murdoch University in Australia, and a Bachelor of Business, with a major in marketing, from Edith Cowan University in Australia.

Dr. Charles Cheung Wai Bun (J.P.) is chairman and a director of our company. He has over 30 years of senior management experience in various industries including over 22 years within the banking industry. Dr. Cheung is Chairman of Joy Harvest International Limited, and he is also Vice-Chairman and Director of First Metro International Investment Company Limited Hong Kong. He is a Senior Adviser to the Metropolitan Bank & Trust Company, one of the leading commercial banking groups in the Philippines. He is an independent Non-Executive Director and Chairman of Audit Committee of Shanghai Electric Group Limited, Shanghai PRC, one of the largest PRC state corporations, Pioneer Global Group Limited and Prime Investments Holdings Limited, which are listed on the main board of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. He was former Independent Non-Executive Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Galaxy Entertainment Group Limited and K. Wah International Holdings Limited which are also listed on the main board of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. He is a Council Member of the Hong Kong Institute of Directors. Dr. Cheung was formerly Group Chief Executive and Executive Deputy Chairman of Mission Hills Group in China which is engaged in luxurious property development, and golf resort in mainland China. It owns the largest golf resort in the World. He was also a former director and advisor to the Tung Wah Group of Hospitals, the largest charitable organization in Hong Kong, and he has served a number of committees of the Hong Kong Government. Dr. Cheung was awarded the Hong Kong Director of the Year Award of Listed Company Non-Executive Directors in 2002. Dr. Cheung holds an Honorary Doctor degree in Business Administration from John Dewey University, a Master degree in Business Administration and a Bachelor of Science degree from New York University, New York, U.S.A.

Aaron Ratner has served as Chief Strategic Officer of our company since December 1, 2008. In this role, he is responsible for managing capital markets, fund raising, investor/public relations and strategic initiatives. From 2007 to 2008, Mr. Ratner was an investment analyst with Aeneas Capital, an emerging market investment fund. From 2006 to 2007, Mr. Ratner was an analyst with Steel Partners, a global activist hedge fund. From 2000 to 2005, Mr. Ratner was an associate with Simon Murray & Company, a multi-strategy investment firm based in Hong Kong. Mr. Ratner holds a Master of Science in Management from the Sloan Masters Program at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business, and a Bachelor of Arts, with majors in economics and international relations, from the University of Pennsylvania.

Edmand Yuk Man Wong is an independent director of our company. From 2005 to present, Mr. Wong has served as College Secretary with the Community College of City University of Hong Kong. From 2004 to 2005, he served as Assistant Registrar with the University of Hong Kong. From 2003 to 2004, Mr. Wong served as the Director of Global Communications for Project Orbis International, Inc., an international charitable organization. Within his career, Mr. Wong has also held various senior positions in communications departments of government agencies and with the Hong Kong Jockey Club. Within these roles over the past 25 years, Mr. Wong was responsible for public relations strategy, corporate branding, and publicity. Mr. Wong holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science from the University of British Columbia.

Kwok Tin Tang is an independent director of our company. For the past 20 years, Mr. Tang has operated as the General Manager of Martin Tang Accountants which provides accounting, corporate secretary and business consultancy services to companies in Hong Kong. Mr. Tang is an associate member of The Hong Kong Institute of Chartered Secretaries and he holds the designation of Chartered Secretary (ACIS). Mr. Tang holds a Higher Diploma in Accounting from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

Alfred Lee Ming Sung was appointed as an independent director of our company on May 15, 2009. Mr. Sung is a practicing Certified Public Accountant and since 1998 he has been the principal of Alfred Sung & Co., an audit and accounting firm based in Hong Kong. Mr. Sung has over 27 years of experience in auditing, accounting, taxation, management and financial advisory services. His previous experience includes 7 years with major international accounting firms. Mr. Sung is currently a practicing member of the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants and an associate member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Australia. He holds a Bachelor of Economics degree from La Trobe University in Australia.

Francis Man Chung Wong served as an independent director of our company until his resignation on May 15, 2009. From 2003 to present, Mr. Wong has been a practicing Certified Public Accountant through Francis Wong C.P.A. Co. Limited. He has over 19 years of experience in auditing, taxation, management and financial advisory services. Mr. Wong is currently an independent director and either chairman or member of the audit / remuneration committee of four companies listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange: China Oriental Group Company Limited, Digital China Holdings Limited, Wai Kee Holdings Limited and Yardway Group Limited. Mr. Wong’s previous experience includes 6 years with KPMG and 2 years with the Hong Kong Securities Clearing Company Limited. Mr. Wong is a fellow member of the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Taxation Institute of Hong Kong, he is an associate member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales, and he is a member of the Society of Chinese Accountants & Auditors. Mr. Wong holds a masters degree in management from Guangzhou Jinan University.

Our directors, executive officers and control persons have not been involved in any of the following events during the past five years:

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our executive officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to file reports regarding ownership of, and transactions in, our securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to provide us with copies of those filings. Based solely on our review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 (and amendments thereto) furnished to us during or in respect of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, all directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of the outstanding common stock filed the reports in a timely manner, with the exception of the following:

On December 31, 2008, our company’s board of directors adopted an amended and restated Code of Ethics that applies to, among other persons, our company’s President and Chief Executive Officer as well as the individuals performing the functions of our Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Controller. As adopted, our Code of Ethics sets forth written standards that are designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

Our Code of Ethics requires, among other things, that all of our company’s personnel shall be accorded full access to our President and Chief Executive Officer with respect to any matter which may arise relating to the Code of Ethics. Further, all of our company’s personnel are to be accorded full access to our company’s board of directors if any such matter involves an alleged breach of the Code of Ethics by our President and Chief Executive Officer.

In addition, our Code of Ethics emphasizes that all employees, and particularly managers and/or supervisors, have a responsibility for maintaining financial integrity within our company, consistent with generally accepted accounting principles, and federal, provincial and state securities laws. Any employee who becomes aware of any incidents involving financial or accounting manipulation or other irregularities, whether by witnessing the incident or being told of it, must report it to his or her immediate supervisor or to our company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. If the incident involves an alleged breach of the Code of Ethics by the President and Chief Executive Officer, the incident must be reported to any member of our board of directors. Any failure to report such inappropriate or irregular conduct of others is to be treated as a severe disciplinary matter. It is against our company policy to retaliate against any individual who reports in good faith the violation or potential violation of our company’s Code of Ethics by another.

Our Code of Ethics is filed as Exhibit 14.1 to this annual report. We will provide a copy of the Code of Ethics to any person without charge, upon request. Requests can be sent to: Lightscape Technologies Inc., 18/F., 318 Hennessy Road, W Square, Wanchai, Hong Kong.

We currently act with a standing audit committee. The audit committee of our board of directors was established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on June 6, 2006 and adopted its charter on June 6, 2006. On December 31, 2008, our board of directors adopted an amended and restated audit committee charter. The audit committee is directed by its charter to review the scope, cost and results of the independent audit of our books and records, the results of the annual audit with management and the adequacy of our accounting, financial and operating controls; to recommend annually to the board of directors the selection of the independent registered accountants; to consider proposals made by the independent registered accountants for consulting work; and to report to the board of directors, when so requested, on any accounting or financial matters.

Our audit committee consists of Alfred Lee Ming Sung (appointed chairperson on May 15, 2009 following the resignation of former chairperson Francis Man Chung Wong on May 15, 2009), Kwok Tin Tang and Edmand Yuk Man Wong, all of whom are or were non-employee directors of our company. Our board of directors has judged and affirmatively determined that each current and former member of the audit committee: (1) meets the definition of independence contained in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules; (2) meets the criteria for independence set forth in Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; (3) has not participated in the preparation of the financial statements of our company or any current subsidiary of our company at any time during the past three years; and (4) is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement.

In the judgment of our board of directors, Alfred Lee Ming Sung (our current audit committee chairperson) and Francis Man Chung Wong (our former audit committee chairperson) each: (1) meets the definition of an “audit committee financial expert,” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K and the rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder; (2) has past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting, or any other comparable experience or background which results in his financial sophistication, including being or having been a chief executive officer, chief financial officer or other senior officer with financial oversight responsibilities; and (3) is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement.

We currently act with a standing nominating and corporate governance committee of our board of directors. This committee was established and adopted its charter on December 31, 2008. The nominating and corporate governance committee is directed by its charter to identify individuals qualified to become directors of our company, and to select such director nominees at the next annual meeting of the shareholders or otherwise; to periodically evaluate the qualifications and independence of each director on our board and its various committees and recommend to our board any changes in its or its committees’ composition; and to develop and recommend to our board of directors corporate governance principles applicable to our company, and oversee the application of such corporate governance principles.

Our nominating and corporate governance committee consists of Edmand Yuk Man Wong (appointed chairperson on December 31, 2008), Alfred Lee Ming Sung (appointed on May 15, 2009 following the resignation of former committee member Francis Man Chung Wong on May 15, 2009) and Kwok Tin Tang, all of whom are or were non-employee directors of our company. Our board of directors has judged and affirmatively determined that each current and former member of the nominating and corporate governance committee meets the definition of independent director: (1) as that term is defined in Item 407(a) of Regulation S-K and the rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder; and (2) as that term is defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules.

As of the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we did not effect any material changes to the procedures by which our stockholders may recommend nominees to our board of directors. If stockholders wish to recommend candidates directly to our nominating and corporate governance committee, they may do so by sending communications to the chairperson of the committee at the address on the cover of this annual report.

We currently act with a standing compensation committee of our board of directors. This committee was established and adopted its charter on December 31, 2008. The compensation committee is directed by its charter to oversee our company’s compensation and benefit plans, policies and practices, including any executive compensation plans, incentive compensation and equity-based plans; to determine, or recommend to the board of directors of our company for determination, the compensation levels of our company’s executive officers, specifically the chief executive officer and the other named executive officers as defined in Rule 3b-7 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; to produce an annual report on executive compensation for inclusion in our company’s annual report or proxy statement if required by applicable securities laws; and to monitor and evaluate matters relating to the compensation and benefits structure of our company.

Our compensation committee consists of Kwok Tin Tang (appointed chairperson on December 31, 2008), Alfred Lee Ming Sung (appointed on May 15, 2009 following the resignation of former committee member Francis Man Chung Wong on May 15, 2009) and Edmand Yuk Man Wong, all of whom are or were non-employee directors of our company. Our board of directors has judged and affirmatively determined that each current and former member of the compensation committee meets the definition of independent director: (1) as that term is defined in Item 407(a) of Regulation S-K and the rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder; and (2) as that term is defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules.

who we will collectively refer to as our named executive officers, of our company for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, are set out in the following summary compensation table, except that no disclosure is provided for any named executive officer, other than our principal executive officer, whose total compensation does not exceed $100,000 for the respective fiscal year:

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compen- sation ($)	Non- Qualified Deferred Compen- sation Earnings ($)	All Other Compen- sation ($)	Total ($)
Bondy Tan President, Secretary, Treasurer and CEO	2009 2008	151,671 154,242	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -	151,671 154,242
Aaron Ratner Chief Strategic Officer	2009 2008	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -	102,000 -	102,000 -

Bondy Tan, as Chief Executive Officer of Tech Team, our wholly-owned operating subsidiary, was paid a salary of $151,671 and $154,242 for our fiscal years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Aaron Ratner, as Chief Strategic Officer of our company, was paid fees of $102,000 and $nil for our fiscal years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Other than Bondy Tan and Aaron Ratner, there were no executive officers of our company or of any of our wholly-owned subsidiaries serving as of March 31, 2009, and no executive officers who served as such during the fiscal years 2009 and 2008, whose total salary and bonus exceeded $100,000 per year.

Our wholly-owned subsidiaries do not maintain, and did not maintain at any time during their most recently completed fiscal years, any long-term compensation plans. As such, there were no long-term compensation plan awards or payouts to any of the executive officers of our wholly-owned subsidiaries during any of their two most recently completed fiscal years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.

Our company did not have any plan in place during the years ended March 31, 2009 or 2008 that provides for payments of other benefits at, following, or in connection with the retirement of any named executive officer.

Our company did not have any compensatory plans or arrangements in place during the years ended March 31, 2009 or 2008 that provides for payment(s) to a named executive officer at, following, or in connection with any termination, including without limitation resignation, severance, retirement or a constructive termination of a named executive officer, or a change in control of the registrant or a change in the named executive officer’s responsibilities.

Our compensation program for our executive officers is administered and reviewed by our compensation committee. Historically, executive compensation consists solely of a base salary. Individual compensation levels are designed to reflect individual responsibilities, performance and experience, as well as the performance of our company. The determination of discretionary bonuses is based on various factors, including implementation of our business plan, development of corporate opportunities and completion of financing.

Our company does not have an effective stock option plan and our company did not grant any stock options to any named executive officers during the years ended March 31, 2009 or 2008.

There were no options outstanding, and hence no options exercised, by any named executive officers during the years ended March 31, 2008 or 2007.

There were no outstanding equity awards held by any named executive officer as of March 31, 2009 or 2008.

Directors may be paid their expenses for attending each board of directors meeting and may be paid a fixed sum for attendance at each meeting of the directors or an annual retainer fee. No payment precludes any director from serving our company in any other capacity and being compensated for the service. Members of special or standing committees may be allowed like reimbursement and compensation for attending committee meetings and/or paid committee and/or chairmanship fees. The following table summarizes compensation paid to all of our directors during the year ended March 31, 2009:

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compen- sation ($)	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Bondy Tan	151,671¹	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	151,671¹
Charles Cheung	12,853	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	12,853
Edmand Yuk Man Wong	7,712	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	7,712
Kwok Tin Tang	7,712	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	7,712
Francis Man Chung Wong	30,859	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	30,859

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The following table sets forth, as of June 30, 2009 certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock and by each of our current directors and executive officers. Each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated. Beneficial ownership consists of a direct interest in the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Position Held	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	Percent of Class ⁽¹⁾
Eastern Advisors Capital, Ltd. 101 Park Avenue, 48th Floor New York, New York 10178	N/A	7,711,345 ⁽²⁾	13.8%
Galaxy China Opportunities Fund Unit 603, Tower 1 Admiralty Centre, 18 Harcourt Road, Hong Kong	N/A	5,441,236 ⁽³⁾	9.7%
SMC Investment Management Limited P.O. Box 957, Offshore Incorporations Centre, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands	N/A	3,700,000 ⁽⁴⁾	6.6%
Liberty Square Strategic Partners IV (Asia) Offshore, L.P. 24 Federal Street, 8th Floor Boston, MA 02110	N/A	2,945,000 ⁽⁵⁾	5.1%
Bondy Tan 18/F., 318 Hennessy Road, W Square Wanchai, Hong Kong	Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of our company	4,099,633 ⁽⁶⁾	7.3%
Charles Cheung A2, 6/F Evergreen Villa, 43 Stubbs Road, Hong Kong	Director of our company	1,458,293 ⁽⁷⁾	2.6%
Aaron T. Ratner 18/F., 318 Hennessy Road, W Square Wanchai, Hong Kong	Chief Strategic Officer of our company	708,000 ⁽⁸⁾	1.3%
Edmand Yuk Man Wong Community College of City University, 6/F., Mong Man-wai Building, Kowloon Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong	Director of our company	Nil	Nil
Kwok Tin Tang Room B, Block A, 1/F., Hoi Tao Building, 11 Belcher’s Street, Sai Wan, Hong Kong	Director of our company	Nil	Nil
Alfred Lee Ming Sung 18/F., 318 Hennessy Road, W Square Wanchai, Hong Kong	Director of our company⁹	Nil	Nil
Francis Man Chung Wong 19^th/F, No. 3 Lockhart Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong	Former Director of our company¹⁰	Nil	Nil
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (six persons)		6,265,926	11.2%

From time to time, the number of our shares held in the “street name” accounts of various securities dealers for the benefit of their clients or in centralized securities depositories may exceed 5% of the total shares of our common stock outstanding.

We are unaware of any contract, or other arrangement or provision of our Articles or Bylaws, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of our company.

Our company did not have an equity compensation plan in place during the years ended March 31, 2009 or 2008 under which equity securities of our company were authorized for issuance.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

Other than as listed below, we have not been a party to any transaction, proposed transaction, or series of transactions in which the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our company’s total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years in which, to our knowledge, any of our directors, officers, five percent beneficial security holder, or any member of the immediate family of the foregoing persons has had or will have a direct or indirect material interest:

Bondy Tan is a director of our company. The amount stated relates to a series of loan transactions made by Bondy Tan to our company and represents the largest aggregate amount of principal outstanding during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, the principal outstanding was $745,501. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, the total amount of principal repaid to Bondy Tan was $192,802. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, the total amount of interest paid to Bondy Tan was $nil. The rate of interest payable on the loans is zero.

We currently act with five directors, consisting of Bondy Tan, Charles Cheung, Alfred Lee Ming Sung, Kwok Tin Tang and Edmand Yuk Man Wong. Our board of directors has judged and affirmatively determined that current directors Alfred Lee Ming Sung, Kwok Tin Tang and Edmand Yuk Man Wong and former director Francis Man Chung Wong each meets the definition of independent director: (1) as that term is defined in Item 407(a) of Regulation S-K and the rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder; (2) as that term is defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules; and (3) that the current board of directors of our company therefore consists of a majority of independent directors. We currently act with a standing audit committee, a standing nominating and corporate governance committee and a standing compensation committee. Each committee is composed solely of independent directors.

Other than as set out below or disclosed under the heading “CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE”, none of our independent directors entered into any transaction, relationship or arrangement during the years ended March 31, 2009 or 2008 that were considered by our board of directors in determining whether the director maintained his or her independence in accordance with Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules.

	Fiscal year ended March 31, 2009	Fiscal year ended March 31, 2008
Audit Fees - MSPC - Yu and Associates CPA Corporation	$265,000 $15,603	Nil $277,500
Audit Related Services	Nil	Nil
Tax Fees - MSPC - Yu and Associates CPA Corporation	Nil $8,000	Nil $12,000
All Other Fees - MSPC - Yu and Associates CPA Corporation - BDO McCabe Lo Limited	Nil	Nil $50,000 $6,000
Total	$288,603	$345,500

This category includes the fees for the examination of our consolidated financial statements and our quarterly reviews of interim financial statements. This category also includes advice on audit and accounting matters that arose during or as a result of the audit or the review of our interim financial statements, and the preparation of an annual “management letter” on internal control matters.

The fees billed by MSPC Certified Public Accountants and Advisors, P.C. for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 were $205,000. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, MSPC Certified Public Accountants and Advisors, P.C. billed our company an aggregate fee of $60,000 for assurance or services relating to our quarterly financial statements. Our audit fees for our prior fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 were $277,500.

We did not incur any audit related services billed by MSPC Certified Public Accountants and Advisors, P.C.during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009. Our audit related services for our prior fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, including the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services relating to the performance of the audit of our financial statements which are not reported under the caption “Audit Fees” above, were $nil.

We incurred tax fees billed by MSPC Certified Public Accountants and Advisors, P.C. of $Nil during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009. The aggregate fees billed during our prior fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, for products and services provided by our former auditors for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, were $12,000.

We did not incur any additional fees billed by MSPC Certified Public Accountants and Advisors, P.C., Yu and Associates CPA Corporation or BDO McCabe Lo Limited other than the fees listed above during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 and we did not incur any additional fees billed by our former auditors other than the fees listed above during our prior fiscal year ended March 31, 2008.

The Securities and Exchange Commission requires that, before MSPC Certified Public Accountants and Advisors, P.C. is engaged by us or our subsidiaries to render any auditing or permitted non-audit related services, the engagement be:

- entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by the audit committee, provided the policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular service, the audit committee is informed of each service, and such policies and procedures do not include delegation of the audit committee’s responsibilities to management.

Our audit committee pre-approved all services provided by our independent accountant. Our audit committee does not have records of what percentage of the above fees were pre-approved. All of the services and fees described under the categories of “Audit Related Fees”, “Tax Fees” and “All Other Fees” were reviewed and approved by our audit committee before or after the respective services were rendered.

Our audit committee has considered the nature and amount of the fees of $265,000 billed by MSPC Certified Public Accountants and Advisors, P.C. and believes that the provision of the services for activities unrelated to the audit is compatible with maintaining the independence of MSPC Certified Public Accountants and Advisors, P.C.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

By: /s/ Bondy Tan
Bondy Tan
President, Secretary and Treasurer
and Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Nevada	98-0217653
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


18/F., 318 Hennessy Road, W Square,
Wanchai, Hong Kong	0000000
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
Nil	Nil

Large accelerated filer [ ]		Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ]	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company [X]

	PAGE NUMBER
PART I	3
ITEM 1. Business	3
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors	11
ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments	22
ITEM 2. Properties	22
ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings	23
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	23
PART II	23
ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	23
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data	24
ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	24
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	32
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	32

	PAGE NUMBER
ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	70
ITEM 9A(T). Controls and Procedures	70
ITEM 9B. Other Information	71
PART III	71
ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	71
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation	76
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	78
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	80
ITEM 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services	81
PART IV	83
ITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	83

Lightscape Technologies Inc. – ‘10-K’ for 3/31/09

On: Tuesday, 7/14/09, at 4:09pm ET · For: 3/31/09 · Accession #: 1062993-9-2446 · File #: 0-30299

Annual Report — Form 10-K
Filing Table of Contents

10-K — Annual Report for the Year Ended March 31, 2009
Document Table of Contents

This is an HTML Document rendered as filed. [ Alternative Formats ]

Dates Referenced Herein and Documents Incorporated by Reference

Quarter Ended	High	Low
March 31, 2009	$0.38	$0.16
December 31, 2008	0.71	0.20
September 30, 2008	1.50	0.60
June 30, 2008	2.00	1.04
March 31, 2008	1.30	0.49
December 31, 2007	0.84	0.49
September 30, 2007	0.54	0.40
June 30, 2007	0.78	0.45

Loss per share
- Basic
Continuing operations	(0.08	)	(0.16	)
Discontinued operations	0.00		(0.06	)
Total	(0.08	)	(0.22	)

- Diluted
Continuing operations	(0.08	)	(0.16	)
Discontinued operations	0.00		(0.06	)
Total	(0.08	)	(0.22	)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
- Basic	55,876,410		42,574,361
- Diluted	55,876,410		42,574,361

							Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income And
	Common Shares						Accumulated Deficit
							Accumulated
							Other				Total
							Comprehensive				Accumulated
							Income				Comprehensive
			Common	Additional			- Foreign				Loss
			Stock	Paid-In			Currency				And		Total
	Number	Amount	Warrants	Capital		Other	Translation		Accumulated		Accumulated		Shareholders’
						Reserves	Adjustment		Deficit		Deficit		Equity

Balance at
March 31, 2007	37,451,410	37,451	-	24,139,333		28,944	322,541		(5,219,895	)	(4,897,354	)	19,308,374

Cancellation of
beneficial
conversion feature
upon redemption
of redeemable
convertible notes	-	-	-	(1,647,273	)	-	-		-		-		(1,647,273	)
Issuance of shares
for additional
working capital	18,425,000	18,425	-	11,993,321		-	-		-		-		12,011,746
Issuance of
warrants	-	-	344,673	(344,673	)	-	-		-		-		-
Foreign currency
translation
adjustment	-	-	-	-		-	759,901		-		759,901		759,901
Net loss	-	-	-	-		-	-		(9,416,075	)	(9,416,075	)	(9,416,075	)

Balance at
March 31, 2008	55,876,410	55,876	344,673	34,140,708		28,944	1,082,442		(14,635,970	)	(13,553,528	)	21,016,673

Foreign currency
translation
adjustment	-	-	-	-		-	(5,088	)	-		(5,088	)	(5,088	)
Net loss	-	-	-	-		-	-		(4,583,250	)	(4,583,250	)	(4,583,250	)

Balance at March
31, 2009	55,876,410	55,876	344,673	34,140,708		28,944	1,077,354		(19,219,220	)	(18,141,866	)	16,428,335

	$

Cash and cash equivalents	21,184
Accounts receivable	459,494
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	23,252
Plant and equipment, net	80,323
Short-term borrowings	(112,772	)
Trade payables	(8,916	)
Amount due to a director	(149,517	)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	(83,524	)
Obligations under capital leases	(11,588	)
Other tax payable	(13,351	)

Net assets	204,585
Excess of net assets over purchase consideration allocated against plant and equipment	(76,050	)
Net assets after excess allocation	128,535

Total consideration	128,535

Testing equipment	4 years
Office equipment	3 - 4 years
Furniture and fixtures	3 - 4 years
Leasehold improvements	shorter of 4 years or the remaining terms of the leases
Motor vehicles	5 - 7 years
Moulds	3 years
Factory machinery and equipment	10 - 16 years
Out-of-home advertising equipment	10 - 12 years

Year ending March 31,		$
2010		378,154
2011		7,823
2012		7,823
2013		5,811
2014		3,462
		403,073

Year ending March 31,		$
2010		55,266
2011		30,352
2012		20,298
2013		11,508
2014		-
		117,424

	2009		2008
	$		$

Deferred tax assets
- tax losses	2,383,469		961,976
- valuation allowance	(1,338,407	)	(877,511	)

Net deferred tax assets	1,045,062		84,465

Deferred tax liabilities
- Tax depreciation allowance in excess of book	(1,045,062	)	(84,465	)
depreciation and amortization

Net deferred tax	-		-

Parameter	For the Year Ended March 31, 2008
Stock price	$1.11
Exercise price	$0.80
Risk-free rate	2.44%
Nature of the warrants	Call
Expected life	5 years
Expected volatility	112.62%
Expected dividend yield	0.00%
Early exercise behavior	150% of the exercise price

Expected volatility	130.30%
Expected term in years	1.25 years
Risk-free interest rate	4.89%
Exercise price	$0.55
Stock price	$0.76 (at January 23, 2007)

	March 31,	March 31,
	2009	2008
	$	$
Raw materials	290,338	700,302
Work in progress	1,195,181	589,119
Finished goods	789,033	589,955
	2,274,552	1,879,376

	March 31,
	2007
	$
Face value of redeemable convertible notes	6,000,000
Estimated value of embedded options	(2,770,800	)
Intrinsic value of beneficial conversion feature	(3,229,200	)
Amortization of discount	147,047

Redeemable convertible notes included under non-current liabilities	147,047

Expected volatility	112.56%
Expected term in years	335 days
Risk-free interest rate	4.89%
Exercise price	$0.55
Stock price at July 16, 2007 being date of first redemption	$0.54

1.	any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

2.	any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offences);

3.	being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or

4.	being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.

Name	Number of Late Reports	Number of Transactions That Were Not Reported On a Timely Basis	Known Failure to File a Required Form
Eastern Advisors Capital, Ltd.	1 ⁽¹⁾	1 ⁽¹⁾	N/A
Eastern Advisors Capital Group LLC	1 ⁽²⁾	4 ⁽²⁾	N/A

⁽¹⁾	Initial Statement of Beneficial Ownership of Securities on Form 3 that was not timely filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission to report acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 10% of our common stock as of July 1, 2008 (1 transaction). Eastern Advisors Capital, Ltd. corrected the late reporting by filing a Form 3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2008.

⁽²⁾	Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership of Securities on Form 4 that was not timely filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission to report share acquisitions made on July 28, 2008, July 29, 2008 (2 transactions) and July 30, 2008. Eastern Advisors Capital Group LLC corrected the late reporting by filing a Form 4 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2008.

1.	honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

2.	full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we file with, or submit to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and in other public communications made by us;

3.	compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

4.	the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Ethics to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code of Ethics; and

5.	accountability for adherence to the Code of Ethics.

(a)	our principal executive officer;

(b)	each of our two most highly compensated executive officers other than our principal executive officer who were serving as executive officers at the end of the year ended March 31, 2009; and

(c)	up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under (b) but for the fact that the individual was not serving as our executive officer at the end of the year ended March 31, 2009,

⁽¹⁾	Based on 55,876,410 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2009. Except as otherwise indicated, we believe that the beneficial owners of the common stock listed above, based on information furnished by such owners, have sole investment and voting power with respect to such shares, subject to community property laws where applicable. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to convertible or derivative securities currently convertible or exercisable or convertible or exercisable within 60 days are deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding such securities, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

⁽²⁾	As disclosed in a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 12, 2009 and a Form 4 filed on August 4, 2008, Eastern Advisors Capital Group, LLC is the investment manager of Eastern Advisors Capital, Ltd., which is the direct owner of 7,711,345 shares of common stock. Scott Booth is the managing member of Eastern Advisors Capital Group, LLC and a director of Eastern Advisors Capital, Ltd. Eastern Advisors Capital Group, LLC, Scott Booth and Eastern Advisors Capital, Ltd. share investment control and power to vote or to direct the vote over 7,711,345 shares of common stock. Eastern Advisors Capital Group, LLC, Scott Booth and Eastern Advisors Capital, Ltd. each disclaims beneficial ownership with respect to any shares other than those owned directly by such person.

(3)	Joe Man Fai Chan is director of Galaxy China Opportunities Fund and has voting and investment control over the shares of common stock.

(4)	Hamilton Tang is director of SMC Investment Management Ltd. and has voting and investment control over the shares of common stock.

(5)	As disclosed in a Schedule 13G filed on May 8, 2009, Liberty Square Asset Management, LLC is the general partner and Liberty Square Asset Management, LP is the investment manager of Liberty Square Strategic Partners IV (Asia) Offshore, L. P. Liberty Square Asset Management, LLC, Liberty Square Asset Management, LP and Liberty Square Strategic Partners IV (Asia) Offshore, L.P. share investment control and power to vote or to direct the vote over 2,945,000 shares of common stock. Liberty Square Asset Management, LLC, Liberty Square Asset Management, LP and Liberty Square Strategic Partners IV (Asia) Offshore, L.P. each disclaims beneficial ownership of all shares except to the extent of its pecuniary interest therein. Thomas J. Niedermeyer, Jr. is a managing member of Liberty Square Asset Management, LLC and has voting and investment control over the shares of common stock.

(6)	As disclosed in a Schedule 13D/A filed on February 12, 2008, Bondy Tan directly beneficially owns and holds investment control and the power to vote or to direct the vote of 2,888,768 shares of our company. Bondy Tan indirectly beneficially owns and holds investment control and power to vote or to direct the vote of 387,000 shares of our company held by Glory Hill Holdings Limited, a company which he solely owns. Bondy Tan indirectly beneficially owns and holds investment control and the power to vote or to direct the vote of 252,273 shares of our company held by Full Scope Group Limited, a company which he solely owns. Bondy Tan indirectly beneficially owns and holds investment control the power to vote or to direct the vote of 571,592 shares of our company held by Excel Means Limited, a company which he solely owns.

(7)	As disclosed in a Schedule 13D filed on January 24, 2005, Charles Cheung indirectly beneficially owns and holds investment control and the power to vote or to direct the vote of 1,458,293 shares of our company held by Leisure Assets Limited, a company which he solely owns.

(8)	As disclosed in a Form 4 filed on December 10, 2008, Aaron T. Ratner indirectly beneficially owns and holds investment control and the power to vote or to direct the vote of 708,000 shares of our company. The 708,000 shares are held by a nominee shareholder in trust for Aaron T. Ratner.

(9)	As disclosed in a Form 8-K filed by our company on May 21, 2009, Alfred Lee Ming Sung was appointed as a director of our company on May 15, 2009.

⁽¹⁰⁾	As disclosed in a Form 8-K filed by our company on May 21, 2009, Francis Man Chung Wong resigned as a director of our company on May 15, 2009.

(a)	Documents filed as part of this annual report:

	(1)	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated July 14, 2009

		Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated June 11, 2008

		Consolidated Balance Sheets as at March 31, 2009 and 2008

		Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008

		Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008

		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008

		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

	(2)	Financial Statement Schedules:

		None.

Lightscape Technologies Inc. – ‘10-K’ for 3/31/09

On: Tuesday, 7/14/09, at 4:09pm ET · For: 3/31/09 · Accession #: 1062993-9-2446 · File #: 0-30299

Annual Report — Form 10-KFiling Table of Contents

10-K — Annual Report for the Year Ended March 31, 2009Document Table of Contents

This is an HTML Document rendered as filed. [ Alternative Formats ]

Dates Referenced Herein and Documents Incorporated by Reference

Annual Report — Form 10-K
Filing Table of Contents

10-K — Annual Report for the Year Ended March 31, 2009
Document Table of Contents

Exhibit Number	Description

(2)	Plan of Purchase, Sale, Reorganization, Arrangement, Liquidation or Succession

2.1	Share Exchange Agreement dated January 7, 2005, among Global Innovative Systems Inc., Tech Team Holdings Limited, Bondy Tan and the Selling Shareholders (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2005)

(3)	(i) Articles of Incorporation; and (ii) Bylaws

3.1	Charter (incorporated by reference from our Registration Statement on Form 10-SB filed on April 11, 2000)

3.2	Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference from our Registration Statement on Form 10-SB filed on April 11, 2000)

3.3	Certificate of Reverse Stock Split filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on November 12, 2003 (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 17, 2003)

3.4	Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on March 3, 2004 (incorporated by reference from our Quarterly Report on Form 10- QSB filed on May 15, 2004)

3.5	Certificate of Change filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on December 23, 2004 (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2005)

3.6	Articles of Merger filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on April 17, 2007 effective April 20, 2007 (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 23, 2007)

3.7	Bylaws (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2008)

(10)	Material Contracts

10.1	Management Contract between Tech Team Holdings Limited / Tech Team Development Limited and Bondy Tan (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2005)

10.2	Redemption Agreement between Lightscape Technologies Inc., Investec Bank (UK) Limited, Full Moon Resources Limited, LP Asset Management Limited and Bondy Tan, dated July 10, 2007 (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 22, 2007)

10.3	Form of Subscription Agreement dated August 21, 2007 (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 22, 2007)

10.4	Subscription Agreement between Lightscape Technologies Inc. and SMC Investment Management Limited dated December 11, 2007 (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 14, 2007)

10.5	Joint Venture Agreement between Lightscape Technologies (Greater China) Limited, Beijing Xintong Media & Cultural Development Co. Ltd., Beijing New Vision Media Advertising Co. Ltd. and Miss Yao Po Chun dated February 12, 2008 (Translated from Chinese) (incorporated by reference from our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed on July 14, 2008)

Exhibit Number	Description

10.6	Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, among Lightscape Technologies Inc. and the investors named therein dated March 9, 2008 (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2008)

10.7	Form of Registration Rights Agreement among Lightscape Technologies Inc. and the investors named therein dated March 9, 2008 (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2008)

10.8	Escrow Agreement among Lightscape Technologies Inc., Roth Capital Partners, LLC and Tri- State Title & Escrow, LLC, as escrow agent, dated March 9, 2008 (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2008)

10.9	Form of Placement Agent Warrant (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2008)

10.10	Agreement between Lightscape Technologies Inc. and Aaron Tibor Ratner dated April 18, 2008 (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 5, 2008)

(14)	Code of Ethics

14.1	Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2009)

(21)	Subsidiaries

21.1*	List of subsidiaries

(31)	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

31.1*	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer filed pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(32)	Section 1350 Certifications

32.1*	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Signature	Title	Date


By: /s/ *Bondy Tan*
Bondy Tan	President, Secretary, Treasurer	July 14, 2009
	and Chief Executive Officer and
	Director
	(Principal Executive Officer,
	Principal Financial Officer and
	Principal Accounting Officer)



By: /s/ *Charles Cheung*
Charles Cheung	Director	July 14, 2009



By: /s/ *Edmand Yuk Man Wong*
Edmand Yuk Man Wong	Director	July 14, 2009



By: /s/ *Kwok Tin Tang*
Kwok Tin Tang	Director	July 14, 2009



By: /s/ *Alfred Lee Ming Sung*
Alfred Lee Ming Sung	Director	July 14, 2009

This ‘10-K’ Filing	Date	Other Filings

	3/17/13
	8/22/11
	4/12/10
	12/31/09	10-KT, NT 10-K
	10/14/09
Filed on:	7/14/09
	7/1/09
	6/30/09	10-Q, NT 10-Q
	6/15/09
	5/21/09	8-K
	5/15/09	3, 8-K
	5/12/09
	5/8/09	SC 13G
	4/2/09
For Period End:	3/31/09	NT 10-K
	3/7/09
	2/19/09
	2/12/09	SC 13G/A
	1/6/09	8-K
	1/1/09
	12/31/08	10-Q, 8-K
	12/29/08
	12/15/08
	12/10/08	4
	12/5/08	3, 4, 8-K
	12/1/08	3, 4, 8-K
	11/15/08
	10/16/08
	10/14/08	8-K
	9/30/08	10-Q
	9/29/08
	8/23/08
	8/4/08	3, 4, SC 13G/A
	7/31/08	8-K
	7/30/08
	7/29/08	424B3
	7/28/08	4
	7/25/08	8-K
	7/14/08	10KSB
	7/2/08
	7/1/08	3
	6/30/08	10-Q, NT 10-K
	6/27/08
	6/11/08
	4/18/08
	4/1/08	4
	3/31/08	10KSB, NT 10-K
	3/17/08	8-K
	3/10/08	8-K
	3/9/08	8-K
	3/8/08
	2/12/08	4, 8-K, SC 13D/A
	1/1/08
	12/31/07	10QSB
	12/14/07	8-K
	12/11/07	8-K
	12/10/07
	10/15/07
	9/30/07	10QSB
	8/22/07	4, 8-K, SC 13G/A
	8/21/07	3
	8/20/07	4
	8/1/07	3, 8-K
	7/16/07
	7/10/07	8-K
	6/30/07	10QSB, NT 10-Q
	6/5/07	8-K
	5/31/07
	5/30/07	8-K
	4/23/07	8-K, 8-K/A
	4/20/07	8-K, 8-K/A
	4/17/07
	4/3/07
	4/1/07
	3/31/07	10KSB, NT 10-K
	2/1/07
	1/23/07	3
	12/9/06
	10/1/06
	9/29/06	8-K
	6/6/06
	6/5/06	3, 8-K
	4/28/06	8-K/A
	3/31/06	10KSB, NT 10-K
	3/8/06
	2/6/06
	6/30/05	10QSB, NT 10-Q
	1/24/05	3, SC 13D
	1/18/05	8-K
	1/13/05	3, 8-K, 8-K/A
	1/7/05	8-K
	1/6/05	8-K
	12/23/04
	5/15/04
	3/3/04
	12/17/03	8-K
	11/12/03	8-K
	4/17/01
	4/11/00	10SB12G
	11/12/99
	5/18/98
	9/25/96
	9/14/95
		List all Filings