SEC Info℠

Home

Search

My Interests

Help

Sign In

Please Sign In

Mack Cali Realty Corp – ‘PREC14A’ on 4/23/20 re: Mack Cali Realty Corp

On:  Thursday, 4/23/20, at 10:20am ET   ·   Accession #:  1104659-20-49801   ·   File #:  1-13274

1 Reference:  By:  SEC – ‘UPLOAD’ on 4/30/20

in

this entire Filing. an “Entity” Search.

Show

Documents searched

and

each “hit”. the 1st “hit”.

↓↑Hints

 Text Wildcards:  ? (any letter/digit),  * (many).  Search Logic:  for Documents:  & (and),  | (or);  for Text:  | (anywhere),  "(&)" (near).  Details... 

  As Of               Filer                 Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size             Issuer                      Filing Agent

 4/23/20  Mack Cali Realty Corp             PREC14A                1:2.0M Mack Cali Realty Corp             Toppan Merrill/FA

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: PREC14A     Preliminary Proxy Statement for a Contested         HTML    557K 
                Solicitation                                                     

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.                   )

PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT DATED APRIL 23, 2020

MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION

Harborside 3, 210 Hudson Street, Ste. 400

Jersey City, New Jersey 07311

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (referred to as the “Annual Meeting”) of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, a Maryland corporation (referred to as the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”), to be held in the Manhattan Ballroom of The Hyatt Regency Jersey City, Harborside, 2 Exchange Place, Jersey City, New Jersey 07302, on Wednesday, June 10, 2020, at 12:00 p.m., local time, for the following purposes:

The accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and proxy statement describe these matters in more detail. We urge you to read this information carefully.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote: FOR each of the Board of Directors’ eleven nominees for election to the Board of Directors named in the Company’s proxy statement, FOR the proposal to adopt, on an advisory basis, a resolution approving the compensation of our named executive officers, and FOR the proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020.

Bow Street Special Opportunities Fund XV, LP (referred to as “Bow Street”) has nominated eight director candidates, including four individuals currently serving on the Board of Directors, for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting in opposition to the nominees recommended by our Board of Directors. As a result, you may receive solicitation materials, including a Gold proxy card, from Bow Street seeking your proxy to vote for the Bow Street nominees. The Board of Directors has not approved or nominated, and does not endorse or support, any of Bow Street’s director nominees. WE URGE YOU NOT TO SIGN OR RETURN ANY GOLD PROXY CARD SENT TO YOU BY BOW STREET, EVEN AS A PROTEST VOTE AGAINST BOW STREET AND ITS DIRECTOR CANDIDATES. Instead, our Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each of the Board of Directors’ eleven director nominees named in the Company’s proxy statement.

If you have already voted using a Gold proxy card sent to you by Bow Street, you can revoke that proxy by voting FOR the Board of Directors’ nominees named in the Company’s proxy statement by using the enclosed WHITE proxy card. Only the latest dated and validly executed proxy that you submit will count at the Annual Meeting.

We recognize the difficulty of conducting the Annual Meeting as an in-person meeting during the current COVID-19 crisis.  However, because the Annual Meeting is a contested election as a result of the proxy contest initiated by Bow Street, we are unable to conduct the Annual Meeting as a virtual meeting, as would otherwise be our preference. Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, and regardless of the number of shares of the Company that you own, it is important that your shares be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting. Therefore, our Board of Directors urges you to vote your shares via the Internet or telephone or by mail by promptly marking, signing and dating the enclosed WHITE proxy card and returning it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

On behalf of the Board of Directors, we thank you for your support and participation.

If you have questions or need assistance voting your shares, please contact:

1407 Broadway, 27th Floor

New York, New York 10018

proxy@mackenziepartners.com

Call Collect: (212) 929-5500

or

Toll-Free (800) 322-2885

PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT DATED APRIL 23, 2020

MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION

Harborside 3, 210 Hudson Street, Ste. 400

Jersey City, New Jersey 07311

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON JUNE 10, 2020

To Our Stockholders:

Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (referred to as the “Annual Meeting”) of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, a Maryland corporation (referred to as the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”), will be held in the Manhattan Ballroom of The Hyatt Regency Jersey City, Harborside, 2 Exchange Place, Jersey City, New Jersey 07302 on Wednesday, June 10, 2020, at 12:00 p.m., local time, for the following purposes:

The attached proxy statement (referred to as the “Proxy Statement”), which forms a part of this Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference, includes information relating to these proposals. Additional purposes of the Annual Meeting are to receive reports of officers (without taking action thereon) and to transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

All stockholders of record as of the close of business on April 16, 2020 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any continuation, adjournment or postponement thereof. At least a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting is required for a quorum. You may vote electronically via the Internet or by telephone. The instructions on your enclosed WHITE proxy card describe how to use these convenient services. Of course, if you prefer, you can vote by mail by promptly marking, signing and dating the enclosed WHITE proxy card and returning it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. If your shares are held by a bank, broker or other agent, please follow the instructions from your bank, broker or other agent to have your shares voted.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote: FOR each of the Board of Directors’ eleven nominees for election to the Board of Directors named in the Proxy Statement, FOR the proposal to adopt, on an advisory basis, a resolution approving the compensation of our named executive officers, and FOR the proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020.

Bow Street Special Opportunities Fund XV, LP (referred to as “Bow Street”) has nominated eight director candidates, including four individuals currently serving on the Board of Directors, for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting. Bow Street’s nominees are in opposition to the nominees recommended by our Board of Directors. As a result, you may receive solicitation materials, including a Gold proxy card, from Bow Street seeking your proxy to vote for the Bow Street nominees. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS NOT APPROVED OR NOMINATED, AND DOES NOT ENDORSE OR SUPPORT, ANY OF BOW STREET’S DIRECTOR NOMINEES. WE URGE YOU NOT TO SIGN OR RETURN ANY GOLD PROXY CARD SENT TO YOU BY BOW STREET, EVEN AS A PROTEST VOTE AGAINST BOW STREET AND ITS DIRECTOR CANDIDATES. Instead, our Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each of the Board of Directors’ eleven director nominees named in the Proxy Statement.

If you have already voted using a Gold proxy card sent to you by Bow Street, you can revoke that proxy by voting FOR the Board of Directors’ nominees named in the Proxy Statement by using the enclosed WHITE proxy card. Only the latest-dated and validly executed proxy that you submit will count at the Annual Meeting.

We recognize the difficulty of conducting the Annual Meeting as an in-person meeting during the current COVID-19 crisis.  However, because the Annual Meeting is a contested election as a result of the proxy contest initiated by Bow Street, we are unable to conduct the Annual Meeting as a virtual meeting, as would otherwise be our preference. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS APPRECIATES AND ENCOURAGES YOUR PARTICIPATION IN THE ANNUAL MEETING. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING IN PERSON, IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOUR SHARES BE REPRESENTED. ACCORDINGLY, PLEASE AUTHORIZE A PROXY TO VOTE YOUR SHARES VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE OR BY MAIL USING THE ENCLOSED WHITE PROXY CARD. IF YOU ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU MAY WITHDRAW YOUR PROXY, IF YOU WISH, AND VOTE IN PERSON. YOUR PROXY IS REVOCABLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN THE PROXY STATEMENT.

	By Order of the Board of Directors,
	Gary T. Wagner General Counsel and Secretary

April [l], 2020

Jersey City, New Jersey

If you have questions or need assistance voting your shares, please contact:

1407 Broadway, 27th Floor

New York, New York 10018

proxy@mackenziepartners.com

Call Collect: (212) 929-5500

or

Toll-Free (800) 322-2885

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT DATED APRIL 23, 2020

MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION

Harborside 3, 210 Hudson Street, Ste. 400

Jersey City, New Jersey 07311

PROXY STATEMENT FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON JUNE 10, 2020

INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

General Information

This Proxy Statement is furnished to stockholders of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board of Directors”) of proxies in the accompanying form for use in voting at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held in the Manhattan Ballroom of The Hyatt Regency Jersey City, Harborside, 2 Exchange Place, Jersey City, New Jersey 07302 on Wednesday, June 10, 2020, at 12:00 p.m., local time, and any continuation, adjournment or postponement thereof.

We intend to mail this Proxy Statement, the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the accompanying proxy card to all stockholders of record entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting on or about May 1, 2020.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON JUNE 10, 2020.

This Proxy Statement, the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Our Annual Report to Stockholders are available at http://www.ViewOurMaterial.com/CLI

Purpose of the Annual Meeting

At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders will consider and vote on the following matters:

YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ ELEVEN DIRECTOR NOMINEES NAMED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALSO RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO ADOPT, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2020. YOU CAN VOTE VIA THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE OR BY MAIL BY COMPLETING, SIGNING AND DATING THE ENCLOSED WHITE PROXY CARD AND RETURNING IT IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED.

Bow Street Special Opportunities Fund XV, LP (“Bow Street”) has nominated eight director candidates, including four individuals currently serving on the Board of Directors, for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting. Bow Street’s nominees are in opposition to the nominees recommended by our Board of Directors. As a result, you may receive solicitation materials, including a Gold proxy card, from Bow Street seeking your proxy to vote for the Bow Street nominees. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS NOT APPROVED OR NOMINATED, AND DOES NOT ENDORSE OR SUPPORT, ANY OF BOW STREET’S DIRECTOR NOMINEES. WE URGE YOU NOT TO SIGN OR RETURN ANY GOLD PROXY CARD SENT TO YOU BY BOW STREET, EVEN AS A PROTEST VOTE AGAINST BOW STREET AND ITS DIRECTOR CANDIDATES. Instead, our Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each of the Board of Directors’ eleven director nominees named in the Proxy Statement.

If you have already voted using a Gold proxy card sent to you by Bow Street, you can revoke that proxy by voting FOR the Board of Directors’ nominees named in the Proxy Statement by using the enclosed WHITE proxy card. Only the latest-dated and validly executed proxy that you submit will count at the Annual Meeting.

Solicitation and Voting Procedures

Solicitation. The Board of Directors is soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting from our stockholders, and the Company will bear all attendant costs. These costs will include the expense of preparing and mailing proxy materials for the Annual Meeting and reimbursements paid to brokerage firms and others for their expenses incurred in forwarding solicitation material regarding the Annual Meeting to beneficial owners of the Company’s common stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Common Stock”). The Company has retained MacKenzie Partners, Inc., 1407 Broadway, 27^th Floor, New York, New York 10018 (“MacKenzie Partners”), to perform various proxy solicitation services in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting. The Company will pay MacKenzie Partners a fee not to exceed $350,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses, for such services. MacKenzie Partners expects that approximately 30 of its employees will assist in the solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting. We may use several of our regular employees, who will not be specifically compensated, to solicit proxies from our stockholders, either personally or via the Internet or by telephone, facsimile or special delivery letter.

As a result of the proxy contest initiated by Bow Street, we may incur substantial additional costs in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting. These additional solicitation costs are expected to include, among others, the fees and expenses of MacKenzie Partners, fees and expenses of our outside media and communications consulting firm, fees and expenses of outside counsel in connection with a contested election of the Company’s directors, costs associated with SEC filings, increased printing and mailing costs related to additional mailings of solicitation materials to stockholders, and the costs of retaining an independent inspector of elections. Our aggregate expenses related to our solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting, excluding salaries and wages of our regular employees, any costs related to any litigation in connection with the Annual Meeting and expenses that we would ordinarily incur in connection with an uncontested annual meeting, are expected to be approximately $[l], of which approximately $[l] has been incurred as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

Under applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), members of the Board of Directors and certain officers and employees of the Company may be deemed to be “participants” with respect to the Company’s solicitation of proxies in connection with the Annual Meeting by reason of their positions as directors and director nominees of the Company or because they may be soliciting proxies on our behalf. Certain information concerning such persons (the “Participants”) is set forth in this Proxy Statement and Annex A hereto.

Householding of Proxy Materials. In accordance with a notice sent previously to beneficial owners holding shares in street name (for example, through a bank, broker or other holder of record) who share a single address with other similar holders, only one Annual Report and Proxy Statement is being sent to that address unless contrary instructions were received from any stockholder at that address. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce printing and postage costs. Any of such beneficial owners may discontinue householding by writing to the address or calling the telephone number provided for such purpose by their holder of record. Any such stockholder may also request prompt delivery of a copy of the Annual Report or Proxy Statement by contacting the Company at (732) 590-1010 or by writing to Gary T. Wagner, General Counsel and Secretary, Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, Harborside 3, 210 Hudson Street, Ste. 400, Jersey City, New Jersey 07311. Other beneficial owners holding shares in street name may be able to initiate householding if their holder of record has chosen to offer such service, by following the instructions provided by the record holder.

Voting. Stockholders of record may authorize the proxies named in the enclosed WHITE proxy card to vote their shares of Common Stock in the following manner:

Different Color Proxy Cards. Bow Street has nominated eight director candidates, including four individuals currently serving on the Board of Directors, for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting in opposition to the nominees recommended by our Board of Directors. As a result, you may receive solicitation materials, including a Gold proxy card, from Bow Street seeking your proxy to vote for the Bow Street nominees. The Company is not responsible for the accuracy of any information provided by or relating to Bow Street contained in any proxy solicitation materials filed or disseminated by or on behalf of Bow Street or any other statements that Bow Street may otherwise make.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS NOT APPROVED OR NOMINATED, AND DOES NOT ENDORSE OR SUPPORT, ANY OF BOW STREET’S DIRECTOR NOMINEES. WE URGE YOU NOT TO SIGN OR RETURN ANY GOLD PROXY CARD SENT TO YOU BY BOW STREET. Instead, our Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” each of the Board of Directors’ eleven director nominees named in this Proxy Statement.

Voting to “withhold authority” with respect to any of Bow Street’s nominees on its Gold proxy card is not the same as voting “FOR” the Board of Directors’ eleven director nominees. This is because a vote to “withhold authority” with respect to any of Bow Street’s nominees on its Gold proxy card will revoke any previous proxy submitted by you to vote “FOR” the Board of Directors’ eleven director nominees on a WHITE proxy card, as only your latest dated and signed proxy card will be counted at the Annual Meeting. DO NOT RETURN ANY GOLD PROXY CARD SENT TO YOU BY BOW STREET, EVEN AS A PROTEST VOTE AGAINST BOW STREET AND ITS DIRECTOR NOMINEES.

The Company has provided you with the enclosed WHITE proxy card. The Board of Directors recommends using the enclosed WHITE proxy card to vote “FOR” each of the Board of Directors’ eleven director nominees named in this Proxy Statement. If the Company receives a validly executed proxy card from you, your shares will be voted by the Company proxies as indicated in your voting preference selection. We encourage you to cast your vote “FOR” each of the proposals, following the instructions on your WHITE proxy card, as promptly as possible.

If you have already voted using a Gold proxy card sent to you by Bow Street, you have every right and the ability to change your vote. We urge you to revoke that proxy by voting “FOR” the Board of Directors’ eleven director nominees named in this Proxy Statement by using the enclosed WHITE proxy card. Only the latest-dated and validly executed proxy that you submit will count at the Annual Meeting.

Revocability of Proxies. Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked by the person giving it at any time before it is exercised in the same manner in which it was given or by taking any of the following actions:

Written notices of revocation and other communications with respect to the revocation of proxies should be addressed to:

Mack-Cali Realty Corporation

Harborside 3, 210 Hudson Street, Ste. 400

Jersey City, New Jersey 07311

Attention: Gary T. Wagner, General Counsel and Secretary

If your shares are held in “street name,” you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee. You must contact your broker, bank or other nominee to find out how to do so.

If you have previously signed a Gold proxy card sent to you by Bow Street or otherwise voted according to instructions provided by Bow Street, you may change your vote and revoke your prior proxy by signing, dating and returning the enclosed WHITE proxy card in the accompanying envelope or by voting by telephone or via the Internet by following the instructions on the WHITE proxy card. DO NOT RETURN ANY GOLD PROXY CARD SENT TO YOU BY BOW STREET, EVEN AS A PROTEST VOTE AGAINST BOW STREET AND ITS DIRECTOR NOMINEES. Submitting a Gold proxy card sent to you by Bow Street (even if you withhold your vote on the Bow Street nominees) will revoke votes you have previously made via our WHITE proxy card.

Voting in Person. If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting and wish to vote in person, you will be given a ballot at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders who wish to attend the Annual Meeting will be required to present verification of ownership of our Common Stock, such as a bank or brokerage firm account statement, and will be required to present a valid government-issued picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, to gain admittance to the Annual Meeting. No cameras, recording equipment, electronic devices, large bags, briefcases or packages will be permitted in the Annual Meeting.

Record Date; Outstanding Shares. The close of business on April 16, 2020 has been fixed as the record date (the “Record Date”) for determining the holders of shares of Common Stock entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. Each share of Common Stock outstanding on the Record Date is entitled to one vote on all matters, and there are no cumulative voting rights. As of the Record Date, there were 90,596,547 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.

Voting Procedures; Quorum and Votes Required. Stockholder votes will be tabulated by the persons appointed by the Board of Directors to act as inspectors of election for the Annual Meeting. The inspectors of election will also determine whether a quorum is present. The presence at the Annual Meeting of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, represented either in person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting.

Shares represented by a properly executed and delivered proxy will be voted at the Annual Meeting and, when instructions have been given by the stockholder, will be voted in accordance with those instructions. If a properly executed and delivered WHITE proxy card does not provide instructions, then the shares represented by that proxy will be voted “FOR” the election of each of the Board of Directors’ eleven nominees for director named below, “FOR” the advisory approval of executive compensation, and “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020.

If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominees, you will receive instructions from such nominee that you must follow in order to vote your shares. If your shares are not registered in your own name and you plan to vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting, you should contact your broker or agent to obtain a broker’s proxy card and bring it with you to the Annual Meeting in order to vote. Under New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) Rules, only the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent auditors, as set forth in Proposal No. 3, is considered a “discretionary” item. This means that brokerage firms may vote in their discretion on Proposal No. 3 on behalf of beneficial owners who have not furnished a properly executed proxy card or delivered voting instructions to their broker at least ten days before the date of the Annual Meeting. In contrast, the election of directors as set forth in Proposal No. 1 and the advisory vote to approve executive compensation as set forth in Proposal No. 2 are considered non-discretionary items. This means that brokerage firms that have not received a properly executed proxy card or voting instructions from their clients may not vote on behalf of their clients with respect to Proposals Nos. 1 and 2. These so called “broker non-votes” will be included in the calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining a quorum, but will not be included in the total number of votes cast for the election of directors or the advisory vote for approval of executive compensation.

Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors. A plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares of Common Stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote in the election of directors is required for the election of directors. Accordingly, the eleven director nominees that receive the greatest number of “FOR” votes will be elected to the Board of Directors. Abstentions, failures to vote and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors.

Proposal No. 2: Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares of our Common Stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal is required for the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. Abstentions, failures to vote and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast and, therefore, will have no effect on this proposal.

Proposal No. 3: Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Auditors. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares of our Common Stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal is required for the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent auditors. Abstentions and failures to vote are not considered votes cast and, therefore, will have no effect on this proposal. Because the ratification of the independent auditors is a discretionary item, we do not anticipate receiving any broker non-votes with respect to this proposal.

No Appraisal Rights. Under Maryland law, stockholders will not have appraisal or similar rights in connection with any proposal set forth in this Proxy Statement.

If you have questions or need assistance voting your shares, please contact:

1407 Broadway, 27^th Floor

New York, New York 10018

proxy@mackenziepartners.com

Call Collect: (212) 929-5500

or

Toll-Free (800) 322-2885

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements made in this Proxy Statement may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “plan,” “potential,” “projected,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “target,” “continue,” or comparable terminology. Such forward-looking statements are inherently subject to certain risks, trends and uncertainties, many of which the Company cannot predict with accuracy and some of which the Company might not even anticipate and involve factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or suggested. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and are advised to consider the factors listed above together with the additional factors under the heading “Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as may be supplemented or amended by the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, which are incorporated herein by reference. The Company assumes no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements that become untrue because of subsequent events, new information or otherwise, except as required under applicable law.

BACKGROUND OF THE SOLICITATION

The following is a chronology of the material events leading up to the filing of this Proxy Statement:

In 2015, the Board of Directors determined that Mack-Cali needed to transform itself to remain competitive and continue to deliver value for its stockholders. To facilitate the changes needed, the Board of Directors installed a new management team, which began to implement a portfolio transformation strategy, led by Michael J. DeMarco, designed to reposition the Company’s asset portfolio around higher quality properties in key markets. Over the past four plus years, the Board of Directors and the management team have transformed Mack-Cali from a suburban real estate company operating in 27 disparate markets to a focused company with high-quality class A office and residential properties, primarily along the New Jersey waterfront. The Board of Directors continues to evaluate on an on-going basis the Company’s strategic direction and reviews alternatives for maximizing stockholder value, including potential strategic transactions.

In February 2019, Bow Street submitted to the Company an unsolicited proposal to acquire the Company’s suburban and waterfront office assets in a complex transaction in which the Company’s office assets would be acquired by Bow Street and its partners at a significant discount to their fair market value, and the Company’s residential assets would be spun off to the Company’s stockholders as a newly formed, publicly traded micro-cap residential REIT with a highly levered balance sheet.

On March 10, 2019, Bow Street informed the Company of its intent to nominate a slate of candidates for election to the Board of Directors at the Company’s 2019 annual meeting of stockholders (the “2019 Annual Meeting”) prior to the March 15, 2019 deadline for submitting director nominations under the Company’s bylaws, unless the Company agreed to extend such deadline to continue private discussions with Bow Street regarding its proposal.

In March 2019, the Board of Directors, after careful evaluation of Bow Street’s proposal, in consultation with its financial and legal advisors, unanimously determined that the proposal was inadequate, unworkable and not in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders.

On March 14, 2019, following the Company’s unanimous rejection of Bow Street’s inadequate acquisition proposal, Bow Street nominated a majority slate of six candidates (including two Bow Street principals) for election to the Board of Directors at the 2019 Annual Meeting. Bow Street subsequently reduced its slate to four nominees (eliminating the two Bow Street principals).

On June 12, 2019, four director candidates nominated by Bow Street, namely Alan R. Batkin, Frederic Cumenal, MaryAnne Gilmartin and Nori Gerardo Lietz (collectively, the “Bow Street Directors”), were elected to the Board of Directors at the 2019 Annual Meeting.

For more information relating to the events leading up to the 2019 Annual Meeting, please refer to the section entitled “Background of the Solicitation” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement filed in connection with the 2019 Annual Meeting.

Also on June 12, 2019, the Board of Directors adopted Articles Supplementary to the Company’s charter opting out of certain provisions of the Maryland Unsolicited Takeover Act (MUTA) to eliminate the Board of Directors’ ability to re-classify itself without a stockholder vote.

In June 2019, consistent with the commitments publicly made by the Company prior to and following the 2019 Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors formed a Strategic Review and Valuation Committee (the “Shareholder Value Committee”) comprised of four directors, including two Bow Street Directors, to review, evaluate and make a recommendation to the full Board of Directors regarding the Company’s strategic direction and all available alternatives for maximizing stockholder value, including a potential sale of the Company or its assets. The Shareholder Value Committee retained Goldman Sachs as its independent financial advisors and Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP as its independent legal advisors to assist the committee in its review.

During the period from July 2019 to December 2019, the Shareholder Value Committee, with the assistance of its financial and legal advisors, conducted a comprehensive review of the Company’s strategic direction and all available alternatives for maximizing stockholder value, including a potential strategic transaction involving the Company or its assets.

On July 17, 2019, Bow Street sent a letter to the Board of Directors requesting reimbursement of costs and expenses, totaling approximately $2.0 million, that Bow Street claimed were incurred by Bow Street in connection with its proxy contest to elect directors at the 2019 Annual Meeting. Bow Street did not provide any supporting documentation for the claimed expenses.

On August 1, 2019, the Company and certain members of the Mack family (the “Mack Group”) amended the Contribution and Exchange Agreement, dated as of January 24, 1997, among the Company and members of the Mack Group to terminate the Mack Group members’ rights to designate or nominate members of the Board of Directors.

On August 5, 2019, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors (the “NCG Committee”) held a special meeting, at which it considered (in consultation with its legal advisors) Bow Street’s request for expense reimbursement. The NCG Committee unanimously determined that reimbursement of Bow Street’s costs and expenses relating to the proxy contest would not be appropriate or in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Accordingly, the NCG Committee recommended that the Board of Directors reject Bow Street’s request.

On August 6, 2019, the Board of Directors, acting upon the recommendation of the NCG Committee, determined to reject Bow Street’s request for expense reimbursement. Prior to the Board of Directors’ vote on the matter, the Bow Street Directors informed the Board of Directors that each of them had a conflict of interest due to their relationships with Bow Street and that they would recuse themselves from voting on the matter.

Also on August 6, 2019, the Company held an initial orientation session for the Bow Street Directors, at which the Lead Independent Director and other representatives of the Company discussed the plan for integrating the Bow Street Directors onto the Board and reviewed their duties and responsibilities as Mack-Cali directors. The Lead Independent Director also discussed the Bow Street Directors’ committee assignments.

On August 7, 2019, the Company sent a letter to Bow Street rejecting Bow Street’s request for expense reimbursement. The Company’s letter stated that the Board of Directors had considered Bow Street’s request and determined that reimbursement of Bow Street’s costs and expenses relating to the proxy contest would not be appropriate or in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

On August 9, 2019, Akiva Katz, Bow Street’s managing partner, sent an email to the Bow Street Directors, in which he expressed Bow Street’s continued interest in an immediate sale of the Company or its assets. Mr. Katz did not copy the Chairman of the Board, the Lead Independent Director, any other Board members or the Company’s General Counsel on his email.

On August 16, 2019, the Company, at the request of the Lead Independent Director and the Chair of the NCG Committee, sent an email to Mr. Katz, stating that it was inappropriate for Bow Street to communicate directly with just the four Bow Street Directors, leaving out all other members of the Board of Directors, and advising Mr. Katz that all future communications should be directed to the Company or the entire Board of Directors.

On September 25, 2019, Michael J. DeMarco and representatives of BofA Securities, Inc. (“BofA Securities”), the Company’s financial advisor, held an in-person meeting with Thomas Rizk, a former CEO of the Company and founder of Rizk Ventures, LLC (“Rizk Ventures”), at Mr. Rizk’s request. At the meeting, Mr. Rizk expressed an interest in a potential transaction involving the Company, but declined to provide any substantive terms of a potential transaction, such as purchase price, form of consideration, transaction structure or financing sources. Mr. Rizk indicated that Rizk Ventures would present a specific proposal for a potential transaction within approximately three weeks. However, no such proposal was delivered by Rizk Ventures to the Company or its financial advisors within such time period.

On October 25, 2019, Bow Street sent a letter to the Board of Directors expressing its desire for an immediate sale of the Company or its assets.

On November 27, 2019, Mr. Rizk contacted representatives of BofA Securities to request another in-person meeting with Mr. DeMarco to present an acquisition proposal. In response, representatives of BofA Securities suggested that Mr. Rizk provide the key substantive terms of the proposal that he wished to present, such as the proposed purchase price, form of consideration, transaction structure and financing sources, to facilitate his discussion with Mr. DeMarco at the meeting. However, Mr. Rizk again declined to provide any details relating to Rizk Ventures’ proposal, but continued to insist on an in-person meeting with Mr. DeMarco.

On December 2, 2019, Bow Street sent a letter to the Board of Directors, in which Bow Street indicated that it had “become aware” that a bidder had approached the Company regarding a potential acquisition of Mack-Cali, and expressed concern about the Company’s interactions with that bidder. Bow Street’s letter did not specify the source of Bow Street’s information relating to the bidder or explain how Bow Street became aware of the details of the Board of Directors’ communications with the bidder.

On December 3, 2019, representatives of BofA Securities, at the Company’s request, sent a letter to Rizk Ventures, in which they encouraged Rizk Ventures to submit a written proposal to acquire the Company that would address the key terms of the proposed transaction, including the proposed purchase price and underlying valuation assumptions, transaction structure, equity and debt financing sources, and the identity of any co-bidders or other partners expected to participate in the proposed transaction.

On December 6, 2019, Rizk Ventures delivered to the Company a preliminary, non-binding indication of interest in a potential acquisition of the Company. The indication of interest stated that Rizk Ventures and certain co-bidders would be prepared to acquire the Company for a purchase price in the range of $24.00 to $27.00 per share, which would be paid in a combination of cash and equity securities of UDR, Inc. (“UDR”), which Rizk Ventures described as its “anticipated co-bidder.” The indication of interest also stated that Rizk Ventures expected to secure debt financing from J.P. Morgan. However, the indication of interest did not include the critical information specified by BofA Securities in its December 3, 2019 letter, including, among other key terms, (i) the valuation assumptions underlying the proposed price (which effectively rendered the wide price range specified by Rizk Ventures meaningless), (ii) the proposed equity financing sources and their respective commitment amounts (including the amount of equity proposed to be funded by Rizk Ventures itself), (iii) confirmation from UDR that it was in fact prepared to participate in a potential transaction on the terms described in the indication of interest and (iv) the anticipated sources of debt financing, including confirmation from J.P. Morgan that it was prepared to provide a debt financing commitment for the proposed transaction.

In December 2019, on several occasions, BofA Securities advised Rizk Ventures that in order to present an offer that could be considered and evaluated by the Board of Directors, Rizk Ventures needed to provide the critical information about the proposed transaction that was omitted from its indication of interest. Such critical information was described in detail in two letters sent by BofA Securities, at the Company’s request, to Rizk Ventures. However, despite the detailed guidance provided by BofA Securities, Rizk Ventures never furnished such critical information to the Company or BofA Securities.

On December 17, 2019, at its regularly scheduled meeting, the Board of Directors received and discussed the recommendations of the Shareholder Value Committee and its financial advisors, Goldman Sachs, and the Company’s financial advisors, BofA Securities, which recommendations included the sale of the Company’s entire suburban office portfolio and a possible sale of the Company itself, as well as the formation of a special committee to oversee management’s efforts to implement these initiatives. Each of Goldman Sachs’ and BofA Securities’ presentations included a thorough review of the Company’s strategy, market position, asset values and general market conditions. As part of its presentation, each investment bank also discussed several potential bidders who might have interest in acquiring the Company or its individual divisions, if the Company chose to conduct a sale process. Each investment bank noted that despite its conversations with various potentially interested parties and the fact that the strategic review process was publicly announced by the Company, no party (other than Rizk Ventures) had come forth with a verbal or written offer for the Company. Based on the recommendations of the Shareholder Value Committee, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to proceed with the sale of its entire suburban office portfolio. The Board of Directors also authorized the NCG Committee to form a new special committee to provide assistance and oversight to management in reviewing any acquisition proposals that may be received by the Company. In the context of the presentations made by Goldman Sachs and BofA Securities, the Board of Directors also reviewed and discussed the indication of interest submitted by Rizk Ventures. Representatives of BofA Securities reported that even though BofA Securities, on behalf of the Company, had repeatedly encouraged Rizk Ventures to provide certain critical information necessary for the Board of Directors to review and consider the proposal, Rizk Ventures had failed to provide such information. Representatives of BofA Securities also noted that while Rizk Ventures indicated in one of its letters to the Company that J.P. Morgan was acting as its financial advisor, in their subsequent conversations with representatives of BofA Securities and the Company’s management, representatives of J.P. Morgan denied that they were acting as Rizk Ventures’ financial advisor.

On December 19, 2019, the Company issued a press release announcing that, based on the recommendations of the Shareholder Value Committee, the Board of Directors had determined to sell the Company’s entire suburban office portfolio. The press release disclosed that the Company expected to complete the sale of its suburban office portfolio in 2020 and planned to use the available sales proceeds to pay down its corporate-level, unsecured indebtedness.

On January 3, 2020, as directed by the Board of Directors, the NCG Committee formed a special committee (the “Special Committee”) to provide assistance and oversight to management in evaluating any potential offers that may be received to acquire the Company or any substantial portion of its assets, and continue to explore ways to maximize stockholder value. The Special Committee comprised five Mack-Cali directors (including one of the Bow Street Directors), as voting members, and Michael J. DeMarco, ex officio as CEO of the Company, as a non-voting member. Although the NCG Committee invited both Bow Street Directors who previously served on the Shareholder Value Committee to join the Special Committee, one of these directors declined to serve due to the need to attend to other, more pressing outside business matters.

On January 24, 2020, the NCG Committee held a special meeting, at which it formed a sub-committee consisting of Irvin D. Reid, Laura Pomerantz and Michael J. DeMarco (ex officio as CEO of the Company) to select, engage and oversee the work of a professional search firm to assist the NCG Committee in identifying qualified, independent director candidates to replace the Company’s retiring Chairman of the Board, William L. Mack, two additional current directors who will become subject to the Company’s retirement policy for directors in 2021, as well as any of the current directors who do not wish to stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting.

Also on January 24, 2020, the Special Committee held a special meeting, at which it received and discussed presentations prepared by BofA Securities and the Company’s management regarding the Company’s current strategy for maximizing stockholder value. In the context of these presentations, the Special Committee also discussed the indication of interest in a potential acquisition of the Company previously submitted by Rizk Ventures. The Special Committee concluded that any transaction with Rizk Ventures was highly improbable, given the absence of confirmation that UDR was in fact interested in participating in a potential transaction (which the Company had requested on three separate occasions) as well as Rizk Ventures’ failure to provide any information to confirm its financial wherewithal to complete the acquisition of the entire Company. The Special Committee also noted that, other than the Rizk Ventures indication of interest, the Company or its financial advisors had not received any acquisition proposals from any interested parties since the 2019 Annual Meeting, even after multiple conversations by BofA Securities and Goldman Sachs with various parties.

On January 28, 2020, the NCG Committee, on behalf of the Board of Directors, invited all of the Company’s current directors (other than Mr. Mack), including the four Bow Street Directors, to join the Company’s slate of nominees for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting. Each of the Company’s current directors, including each of the four Bow Street Directors, accepted the NCG Committee’s invitation shortly thereafter.

On January 31, 2020, Rizk Ventures sent a letter to the Board of Directors, in which it indicated that it would be interested in submitting a new bid for the Company. The letter indicated that Rizk Ventures’ was no longer proposing a purchase price in the range of $24.00 to $27.00 per share and stated that the previously announced sale of the Company’s suburban office assets “would likely result in lowering its bid.” The letter also included a term sheet that purported to confirm that J.P. Morgan was prepared to provide $1.8 billion debt financing for the proposed transaction. However, the term sheet (which was marked as a “draft” and was missing all of its exhibits) did not indicate a commitment (or even a “highly confident” undertaking) by J.P. Morgan to provide debt financing for a potential acquisition of the whole Company. Rather, it merely summarized the “indicative” terms and conditions on which J.P. Morgan would provide a loan to Rizk Ventures to purchase a limited and unspecified set of assets (described as “property” in the term sheet), which terms and conditions appeared more appropriate for a real property transaction rather than a public company acquisition or a similar public M&A transaction. Nor did the January 31, 2020 letter include any of the other critical information that had been previously requested by BofA Securities on behalf of the Company on several occasions, including but not limited to the sources and amounts of Risk Ventures’ equity funding.

In February 2020, the Company engaged Ferguson Partners, a nationally recognized director search firm, to assist the NCG Committee in identifying qualified, independent director candidates to replace Mr. Mack as well as two additional current directors who will become subject to the Company’s retirement policy for directors in 2021.

On February 5, 2020, the Board of Directors sent a letter to Rizk Ventures, in which it again encouraged Rizk Ventures to submit a written offer to acquire the entire Company and comply with the Company’s previous information requests, which had been communicated to Rizk Ventures on several occasions. In particular, the Board of Directors’ letter stated that the Company would be prepared to discuss a fully financed offer to acquire the entire Company at an attractive price. The letter also reiterated that any proposal should specify the proposed equity and debt financing sources, transaction structure, and the identity of the members of the buyer group (including their written agreement to participate and their role in a potential transaction). The Board of Directors’ letter also stated that in addition to such critical information, which was missing from Rizk Ventures’ January 31, 2020 letter, Rizk Ventures had not provided to the Company any confirmation that UDR was prepared to participate in a potential transaction, any information about the amount of equity expected to be contributed by UDR, or evidence that UDR was aware of the fact that Rizk Ventures’ indication of interest described UDR as a potential acquiror. In addition, the Board of Directors’ letter stated that the J.P. Morgan term sheet provided by Rizk Ventures did not seem to contemplate the type of debt financing that would be appropriate for a whole-company acquisition.

Prior to sending the Board of Directors’ letter to Rizk Ventures on February 5, 2020, the Company circulated a draft of the letter to all Board members (including each of the Bow Street Directors) for their review and approval. Later that same day, Nori Gerardo Lietz sent a reply email to the Company (with copies to all other members of the Board of Directors), in which she expressed support for the draft letter and stated that she “agreed with the substance and tone of the letter.”

On February 23, 2020, Rizk Ventures sent a letter to the Board of Directors, in which it falsely accused the Company of refusing to engage with Rizk Ventures regarding its indication of interest and stated that it was no longer interested in pursuing a potential transaction with the Company.

On February 28, 2020, the Company issued a press release in which it publicly disclosed its February 5, 2020 letter to Rizk Ventures. The Company chose to publicly disclose its February 5, 2020 letter in response to two articles previously published by Bloomberg, which repeated the inaccurate and misleading statements made by Rizk Ventures in its February 23, 2020 letter to the Board of Directors. The Company’s press release made it clear that Mack-Cali never refused to engage with Rizk Ventures regarding its acquisition proposal. Rather, on several occasions, the Company and BofA Securities encouraged Rizk Ventures to provide certain critical information that was necessary for the Board of Directors to review and evaluate the proposal. However, Rizk Ventures never provided the requested information. The press release stated that the Company believed that Rizk Ventures’ unfounded accusations were nothing more than an attempt to disguise its own inability to provide satisfactory responses to the Company’s information requests and present a credible offer for the whole Company.

On March 2, 2020, UDR issued a press release indicating that any discussions that UDR may have had with Rizk Ventures regarding a potential transaction involving the Company were merely preliminary and that, as of February 7, 2020 (i.e., more than two weeks before Rizk Ventures sent its February 23, 2020 letter to the Board of Directors), UDR had ceased all such discussions with Rizk Ventures. UDR further confirmed that it had never engaged in direct dialogue or correspondence with the Board of Directors or management team of the Company.

From early to mid-March of 2020, the Bow Street Directors engaged in discussions with representatives of Bow Street regarding joining Bow Street’s majority slate of director nominees for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting. In the course of these discussions, each of the Bow Street Directors met with Bow Street’s legal counsel and executed a written consent to be nominated for election to the Board of Directors on Bow Street’s proxy card. The Bow Street directors chose to take this course of action without informing the Board of Directors or discussing their intentions with the Lead Independent Director, the Chair of the NCG Committee or any other members of the Board of Directors, even though each of them had previously accepted the Board of Directors’ good faith invitation to join the Company’s slate of nominees that was made on January 28, 2020.

On March 9, 2020, after several preliminary discussions by representatives of BofA Securities with representatives of a highly reputable potential bidder (“Party A”), representatives of the Special Committee, members of the Company’s management and representatives of BofA Securities met with representatives of Party A, at Party A’s request, to discuss the possibility of a strategic transaction involving the Company. While no offer was presented or discussed at the meeting, representatives of Party A expressed an interest in a potential strategic transaction with the Company. Although Party A’s representatives indicated that, given the current state of the stock and credit markets resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, an offer would not be feasible at this time, they also indicated that, as the markets stabilize, Party A would revisit the possibility of making a proposal to acquire the Company. The Company’s representatives encouraged Party A to do so.

On March 10, 2020, Mr. Katz contacted Mr. Mack by telephone to demand that Bow Street be given four additional seats on the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting (in addition to the four Bow Street Directors). In response, Mr. Mack indicated that he believed that it would be inappropriate for a less than 5% stockholder, such as Bow Street, to have such a vastly disproportionate representation on the Board of Directors. However, Mr. Mack stated that he would inform the Lead Independent Director and the Chair of NCG Committee of his conversation with Mr. Katz.

On March 11, 2020, Mr. Mack contacted Mr. Katz by telephone to advise him that, after discussing the views expressed by Mr. Katz during his telephone conversation with Mr. Mack on March 10, 2020, the NCG Committee continued to believe that Bow Street’s request for a majority control of the Board of Directors was inappropriate.

On March 12, 2020, Bow Street delivered to the Company a formal notice of its intent to nominate a majority slate of eight candidates, including all of the four Bow Street Directors, to stand for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting. On the same day, Bow Street issued, by press release, a public letter to Mack-Cali stockholders, in which Bow Street announced that it was nominating a majority slate of eight candidates, including the four Bow Street Directors and four additional candidates (including Mr. Katz), for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting. Bow Street’s letter also called for the removal of the Company’s CEO, Michael J. DeMarco.

Following the Company’s receipt of Bow Street’s nomination notice, in light of the Bow Street Directors’ decision to forego the opportunity to be re-nominated on the Company’s slate, the NCG Committee directed Ferguson Partners to expand its search for qualified, independent director candidates to replace the Bow Street Directors on the Company’s slate of nominees for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting. The NCG Committee instructed Ferguson Partners to focus its search on candidates that had extensive finance, real estate, mergers and acquisitions and corporate governance experience, consistent with the Company’s strategy of selling its suburban office assets and pursuing strategic alternatives. The NCG Committee also emphasized the need for Ferguson Partners to evaluate potential candidates based on their board and leadership experience, diversity, cultural fit and credibility among REIT investors.

On March 13, 2020, Mr. Katz contacted Alan S. Bernikow, the Company’s Lead Independent Director, by telephone to discuss Bow Street’s proxy contest. In the course of their telephone conversation, Mr. Bernikow indicated that in order to avoid another costly and distracting proxy contest, the Board of Directors would be willing to include three of the Bow Street Directors in the Company’s slate of nominees for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting, if Bow Street agreed to end its proxy contest. In response, Mr. Katz indicated that Bow Street was not prepared to end its proxy contest unless the Company offered Bow Street majority control of the Board of Directors.

On March 16, 2020, the Company issued a press release responding to Bow Street’s public letter to stockholders. The Company’s press release reiterated that the Board of Directors is open to all alternatives to maximize stockholder value, including a potential strategic transaction, and will consider all credible offers. The press release stated that the Board of Directors intends to launch a strategic process and that, in the meantime, the Special Committee will assist the Board of Directors and management in evaluating any acquisition proposals or inquiries that may be received from any interested parties. The press release also noted that, contrary to Bow Street’s allegations, other than the indication of interest submitted by Rizk Ventures in December 2019, which the Special Committee determined was an illusory offer from a party that did not have the financial wherewithal to complete a potential transaction, the Company has not received or rejected any verbal or written acquisition proposals from any suitors since the 2019 Annual Meeting.

On March 23, 2020, the Board of Directors, at its regularly scheduled quarterly meeting, formed a committee (the “Annual Meeting Committee”) consisting of all of the Company’s current directors other than the four Bow Street Directors to review and approve the recommendations of the NCG Committee for the Company’s slate of nominees for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting and to determine all other matters relating to the proxy contest initiated by Bow Street.

On March 24, 2020, Mr. Bernikow held a telephone conversation with Alan Batkin, one of the Bow Street Directors, at Mr. Batkin’s request, in which Mr. Bernikow again offered to include three of the Bow Street Directors in the Company’s slate of nominees for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting, if Bow Street agreed to end its proxy contest.

On March 27, 2020, Mr. Katz sent a letter to Mr. Bernikow, in which he rejected the Company’s settlement offer. Mr. Katz’s letter indicated that Bow Street was not willing to end its proxy contest for a majority of the Board of Directors, but would be willing to remove the four Bow Street Directors from its slate if the Company irrevocably agreed to include all four of them in the Company’s slate and support their re-election to the Board of Directors in the same manner as it supports the election of the Company’s other nominees. Through its demand for an irrevocable commitment by the Company to nominate and support the re-election of the Bow Street Directors, Bow Street effectively sought to ensure the election of four of its eight candidates, such that Bow Street could have eight seats on the Board of Directors if all Bow Street’s other nominees were elected at the Annual Meeting.

Also on March 27, 2020, Mr. DeMarco sent an email to Mr. Katz, in which he asked him to clarify whether Bow Street would be willing to end its proxy contest if the Company agreed to include all four of the Bow Street Directors in the Company’s slate. Later that same day, Mr. Katz sent a reply email to Mr. DeMarco, in which he indicated that Bow Street was not prepared to end its proxy contest and that it was proposing merely to reduce its slate from eight to four nominees if the Company agreed to include all four of the Bow Street Directors in the Company’s slate.

On March 30, 2020, Mr. Bernikow, on behalf of the Board of Directors, sent an email to Mr. Katz in response to his letter dated March 27, 2020. Mr. Bernikow’s email stated that, as the Company had previously stated, both publicly and privately, the Board of Directors does not believe it would be appropriate to give majority control of the Board of Directors to Bow Street, a less than 5% activist stockholder who previously attempted to purchase the Company’s premium assets at a discount, and whose platform is to dismiss the Company’s CEO and sell its business in the midst of a national health and economic crisis. However, Mr. Bernikow’s email stated that he would share Mr. Katz’s letter with the NCG Committee, which would consider Bow Street’s proposal and make the appropriate recommendation to the Annual Meeting Committee.

Also on March 30, 2020, the Company issued a press release announcing the formation of the Annual Meeting Committee. The Company also announced that the NCG Committee had retained Ferguson Partners to assist the NCG Committee in identifying qualified, independent director candidates to be nominated for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting to replace Mr. Mack as well as each of the Bow Street Directors, who had chosen to be nominated on Bow Street’s slate and endorsed and sought to advance Bow Street’s self-interested agenda, including gaining control of the Board and firing the Company’s CEO. The press release stated that the NCG Committee was conducting interviews of potential director candidates identified by Ferguson Partners and would make a recommendation to the Annual Meeting Committee with respect to the Company’s slate of nominees for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting. The press release reiterated the Board of Directors’ openness to all alternatives to maximize stockholder value and confirmed its intent to conduct a strategic process as soon as market conditions improved.

On March 31, 2020, Bow Street issued a press release in which it criticized the Board of Directors’ decision not to re-nominate the Bow Street Directors for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting, despite the fact that these individuals had already agreed to join Bow Street’s slate.

Also on March 31, 2020, the NCG Committee held a special meeting, at which it discussed the results of the comprehensive search conducted by Ferguson Partners, under the supervision of the sub-committee formed by the NCG Committee at its previous meeting (the “Sub-Committee”), over the preceding several weeks to identify potential director candidates to be nominated by the Company for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting. The NCG Committee reviewed the qualifications, experience and background of approximately 23 potential director candidates identified by Ferguson Partners and interviewed by the Sub-Committee. Based on the recommendations of the Sub-Committee and Ferguson Partners, the NCG Committee selected eight highly qualified, independent director candidates to be invited for an additional round of interviews with members of the Board of Directors and the NCG Committee, upon completion of which the NCG Committee would select and recommend five candidates to the Annual Meeting Committee for inclusion in the Company’s slate of nominees for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting.

Later in the day on March 31, 2020, the Annual Meeting Committee held a special meeting, at which it discussed the eight director candidates selected by the NCG Committee, including their background, experience and qualifications. The Annual Meeting Committee concluded that each of the eight individuals selected by the NCG Committee is a highly qualified director candidate and determined that each of them should be invited to participate in a second round of interviews with members of the Annual Meeting Committee and the NCG Committee. The Annual Meeting Committee also discussed and approved the recommendation of the NCG Committee to not re-nominate the Bow Street Directors for election to the Board of Directors on the Company’s slate. In making its determination, the Annual Meeting Committee considered the fact that each of the Bow Street Directors had chosen to join the slate of a dissident stockholder who previously attempted to purchase the Company’s premium assets at a discount under threat of a proxy contest and subsequently demanded a $2.0 million fee from the Company, as well as the fact that each of the Bow Street Directors endorsed and sought to advance Bow Street’s self-interested agenda, including gaining control of the Board of Directors, firing the Company’s CEO and forcing an immediate sale of the Company at any price.

During the period from March 31, 2020 through April 5, 2020, members of the Annual Meeting Committee and the NCG Committee conducted interviews of the eight director candidates selected by the NCG Committee.

On April 6, 2020, the Company issued a press release regarding the Board of Directors’ decision not to include the four Bow Street Directors on the Company’s slate of nominees for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting. The Company’s press release stated that although each of the Bow Street Directors accepted the Board of Directors’ invitation to be included in the Company’s slate of nominees, these directors simultaneously and secretly engaged in discussions with Bow Street regarding joining Bow Street’s slate of nominees for election at the Annual Meeting, and ultimately agreed to join Bow Street’s new 2020 proxy contest to gain control of the Board of Directors by seeking eight seats on the Board of Directors (including the four seats currently held by the Bow Street Directors), remove the CEO and force an immediate sale of the Company at a price acceptable to Bow Street, rather than on terms that maximize value for all stockholders. The Company’s press release explained that, under such circumstances, the NCG Committee had no choice but to withdraw its invitation for the Bow Street Directors to join the Company’s slate, because to do otherwise would assist Bow Street, a less than 5% stockholder, in its efforts to take control of the Company to pursue its own agenda.

Also on April 6, 2020, Bow Street issued a press release publicly disclosing the letter sent by Mr. Katz to Mr. Bernikow on March 27, 2020.

Later in the day on April 6, 2020, the Annual Meeting Committee and the NCG Committee held a joint special meeting, at which they discussed the eight director candidates selected by the NCG Committee based on the recommendations of Ferguson Partners, whose interviews had been completed by the Annual Meeting Committee and the NCG Committee prior to the meeting. After an extensive discussion of the background, experience and qualifications of the candidates, as well as their independence as potential Mack-Cali directors, the Annual Meeting Committee, acting upon the recommendation of the NCG Committee, determined to invite the following individuals to join the Company’s slate of nominees for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting: Z. Jamie Behar, Michael Berman, Howard Roth, Gail Steinel and Lee Wielansky. Each of these individuals subsequently accepted the Annual Meeting Committee’s invitation to join the Company’s slate of nominees.

On April 8, 2020, Mr. Bernikow, on behalf of the Board of Directors, sent a letter to Bow Street, again indicating that the Annual Meeting Committee would be willing to include three of the Bow Street Directors in the Company’s slate, if Bow Street agreed to withdraw all of its director nominations and discontinue its proxy contest. Mr. Bernikow’s letter indicated that the inclusion of the Bow Street Directors in the Company’s slate while Bow Street continues to wage a proxy contest for four additional Board seats would only assist Bow Street, a less than 5% stockholder, to achieve its goal of taking control of the Company in order to pursue its own agenda.

On April 13, 2020, the Annual Meeting Committee held a special meeting, at which the Annual Meeting Committee, acting upon the recommendation of the NCG Committee, approved the Company’s slate of eleven nominees for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting. In addition to the Company’s incumbent directors – Alan S. Bernikow, Michael J. DeMarco, Lisa Myers, Laura Pomerantz, Rebecca Robertson and Dr. Irvin D. Reid – the Company’s slate of nominees approved by the Annual Meeting Committee includes five new highly qualified, independent nominees: Z. Jamie Behar, Michael Berman, Howard Roth, Gail Steinel and Lee Wielansky.

On April 14, 2020, the Company issued a press release announcing its slate of eleven nominees for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting.

On April 15, 2020, the Bow Street Directors sent a letter to Messrs. Mack, Bernikow and DeMarco, in which they disputed the view previously publicly expressed by the Company that the Bow Street Directors abdicated their fiduciary duties by agreeing to be named on Bow Street’s slate.

On April 17, 2020, Bow Street filed its preliminary proxy statement in connection with the Annual Meeting.

On April 18, 2020, the Company sent a letter to the Bow Street Directors in response to their April 15, 2020 letter to Messrs. Mack, Bernikow and DeMarco. The Company’s letter reiterated the Company’s view that the Bow Street Directors’ decision to support Bow Street’s campaign to gain control of the Board of Directors, remove the Company’s CEO and pursue an immediate sale of the Company or its assets at a price acceptable to Bow Street, rather than on terms that maximize value for all stockholders, was inconsistent with their fiduciary duties as Mack-Cali directors. The Company’s letter also pointed out that the surreptitious manner in which the Bow Street Directors chose to conduct their discussions with Bow Street regarding joining its slate of nominees, even though each of them had previously accepted the Board of Directors’ invitation to join the Company’s slate of nominees, was inconsistent with the basic principles of director collegiality and good corporate governance. The Company’s letter noted that the actions of the Bow Street Directors were particularly inappropriate in light of the fact that each of them had voted in unanimity with the other Board members on almost every matter over the past year, never raised any concerns with the Company’s CEO and expressed support for the Company’s strategy, as approved by the Board of Directors and carried out by the Company’s management team.

VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS

Unless otherwise indicated, the following table sets forth information as of February 14, 2020 with respect to each person or group who is known by the Company, in reliance on Schedules 13D and 13G reporting beneficial ownership and filed with the SEC, to beneficially own more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock. Except as otherwise noted below, all shares of Common Stock are owned beneficially by the individual or group listed with sole voting and/or investment power.

PROPOSAL NO. 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Board of Directors Nominees

The Board of Directors presently consists of eleven members, as follows: William L. Mack, Michael J. DeMarco, Alan R. Batkin, Alan S. Bernikow, Frederic Cumenal, MaryAnne Gilmartin, Nori Gerardo Lietz, Lisa Myers, Laura H. Pomerantz, Irvin D. Reid and Rebecca Robertson. At the Annual Meeting, the terms of all of the current members of the Board of Directors will expire. Accordingly, stockholders will elect eleven directors at the Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors’ eleven nominees for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting are as follows: Michael J. DeMarco, Alan S. Bernikow, Z. Jamie Behar, Michael Berman, Lisa Myers, Laura H. Pomerantz, Irvin D. Reid, Rebecca Robertson, Howard Roth, Gail Steinel, and Lee Wielansky. Mr. Mack has reached the age of 80 in 2020 and, as a result, has become subject to the Company’s retirement policy for directors, which is described in “Directors and Executive Officers—Governance Matters” below. At the conclusion of the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors intends to appoint a new independent Chairman of the Board. The Board of Directors has determined not to nominate for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting Alan R. Batkin, Frederic Cumenal, MaryAnne Gilmartin and Nori Gerardo Lietz, each of whom has been nominated by Bow Street in opposition to the nominees recommended by the Board of Directors.

At the Annual Meeting, the terms of all eleven current members of the Board of Directors will expire. Accordingly, stockholders will elect eleven directors at the Annual Meeting. The directors who are elected at the Annual Meeting will serve until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2021 and until such directors' respective successors are elected or appointed and qualify or until any such director's earlier resignation or removal. Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them for the eleven nominees named below. In the event any of the Board of Directors’ nominees is unable or unwilling to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for the remaining nominees named in this Proxy Statement and for any substitute nominee designated by the present Board of Directors to fill such vacancy. It is not presently expected that any of the Board of Directors’ nominees named below will be unable or unwilling to serve as a director. If additional persons are nominated for election as directors, the proxy holders intend to vote all proxies received by them in a manner to assure the election of as many of the Board of Directors’ nominees as possible. In such event, the specific nominees to be voted for will be determined by the proxy holders.

Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of our director nominees as of the date of this Proxy Statement:

Michael J. DeMarco, a director nominee, has served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer since April 2017 and as a director of the Company since March 2018. Mr. DeMarco joined the Company in June 2015 and served as President and Chief Operating Officer until he was appointed Chief Executive Officer in April 2017.

Business Experience: Prior to joining the Company, from 2013 to June 2015, Mr. DeMarco served as the chief investment officer of CCRE, a non-bank finance company and one of the largest originators of CMBS. Mr. DeMarco previously served as an executive vice president at Vornado Realty Trust from 2010 to 2013, as a managing director at Fortress Investment Group from 2007 to 2010, and as a senior managing director at Lehman Brothers from 1993 to 2007. As Chief Executive Officer, Mr. DeMarco is responsible for the strategic direction of the Company. Mr. DeMarco also is a member of the board of trustees of Saint Peter’s Preparatory School, as well as a member of The International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC), the Jersey City Medical Center Board of Trustees, and a managing trustee of Liberty Science Center. Since June 2015, Mr. DeMarco has served as a member of the board of trustees of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, a publicly traded REIT.

Education and Professional Affiliations: Mr. DeMarco graduated from the University of Chicago with a Master of Business Administration in Finance, as well as Pace University with a Bachelors in Business Administration in Accounting and a minor in History. He is also a certified public accountant.

Board Qualifications: Based on Mr. DeMarco’s leadership as Chief Executive Officer and his REIT, investment banking and accounting experience, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors concluded that Mr. DeMarco has the requisite experience, qualifications, attributes and skills necessary to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Alan S. Bernikow, a director nominee, has served as a member of the Board of Directors and as chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors since 2004 and was appointed as Lead Independent Director in March 2014. Mr. Bernikow also serves as a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors.

Business Experience: Previously, Mr. Bernikow served as the Deputy Chief Executive Officer at Deloitte & Touche LLP from 1998 to 2003, where he was responsible for assisting the firm on special projects such as firm mergers and acquisitions, partner affairs and litigation matters. Mr. Bernikow joined Touche Ross, the predecessor firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP, in 1977, prior to which Mr. Bernikow was the National Administrative Partner in Charge for the accounting firm of J.K. Lasser & Company. Mr. Bernikow serves on the board of several public companies. He is currently a member of the board of directors of Revlon, Inc. and Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and is chairman of the audit committee and compensation and stock plan committee of Revlon, Inc. From 2003 through March 2017, Mr. Bernikow served as a member of the board of directors and the nominating and corporate governance committee of the Destination XL Group, Inc., formerly the Casual Male Retail Group Inc. From October 2010 until its sale in December 2018, Mr. Bernikow was also a member of the board of directors of FCB Financial Holdings, Inc., chairman of its audit committee and a member of its compensation committee. Mr. Bernikow is also a member of the board of directors of UBS Global Asset Management (US) Inc. (“UBS”) and currently serves as chairman of its audit committee, and has also served as a member of the boards of directors of investment funds managed by UBS, including Global High Income Dollar Fund Inc., Insured Municipal Income Fund Inc., Investment Grade Municipal Income Fund Inc., Managed High Yield Plus Fund Inc., and Strategic Global Income Fund, Inc. The foregoing directorships and committee memberships include public companies or registered investment companies directorships and committee memberships currently held by Mr. Bernikow or which Mr. Bernikow held at any time during the past five years. He is a member of the board of directors for the United Jewish Appeal—Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York, Inc.

Education and Professional Affiliations: Mr. Bernikow has a B.B.A. degree from Baruch College and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and the New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants (NYSSCPA).

Board Qualifications: Based on Mr. Bernikow’s significant financial and accounting background and thirty years of experience in public accounting, his status as an audit committee financial expert, and his experience serving as a director and audit committee member of several public companies, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors concluded that Mr. Bernikow has the requisite experience, qualifications, attributes and skills necessary to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Z. Jamie Behar, a director nominee, has been nominated for her first election to the Board of Directors.

Business Experience: Ms. Behar is a seasoned executive with over thirty-five years of experience in investment management and financial analysis, and deep expertise in the real estate industry. From 1986 to 2015, she served in a number of leadership roles at General Motors Investment Management Corporation (“GMIMCo”), most recently as Managing Director, Real Estate & Alternative Investments. In this position, she was responsible for approximately $12 billion (at peak portfolio value) in private market and publicly traded real estate, energy and timber investments. In addition, she was a member of the board of directors, the investment management committee, the private equity investment approval committee and the risk management committee of GMIMCo. Prior to GMIMCo, she held finance roles at General Motors and Exxon Corporation. Ms. Behar also currently serves as an independent director of ARMOUR Residential REIT, Sunstone Hotel Investors and the Broadstone Real Estate Access Fund, and as a director of Shurgard Self Storage SA. Ms. Behar is not standing for re-election to the board of directors of Sunstone Hotel Investors and will retire from that board at the end of her current term at its 2020 annual meeting of stockholders currently scheduled for April 30, 2020. She has previously served as a director of Forest City Realty Trust and Gramercy Property Trust. The foregoing directorships include public companies or registered investment company directorships currently held by Ms. Behar or which Ms. Behar held at any time during the past five years.

Education and Professional Affiliations: Ms. Behar holds a B.S.E (magna cum laude) from The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, an M.B.A. from Columbia University Graduate School of Business, and the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation.  In December 2018, Ms. Behar was the recipient of Nareit’s E. Lawrence Miller Industry Achievement Award for her contributions to the REIT industry.

Board Qualifications: Based on Ms. Behar’s significant leadership experience in the financial, investment management and real estate industries, as well as her experience serving as a director and audit committee, governance committee and investment committee member of several public real estate investment companies, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors concluded that Ms. Behar has the requisite experience, qualifications, attributes and skills necessary to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Michael Berman, a director nominee, has been nominated for his first election to the Board of Directors.

Business Experience: Mr. Berman brings over thirty years of combined real estate and financial industry experience. Mr. Berman is currently serving as independent director and chair of the audit committees of Brixmor Property Group Inc. and Skyline Champion Corporation. He previously has also served as an Associate Professor of Corporate Finance and Financial Accounting at the New York Real Estate Institute. From 2011 to 2018, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of General Growth Properties, Inc. Previously, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc., a self-managed REIT with 413 properties across 33 states. Earlier in his career, Mr. Berman served in various positions with Merrill Lynch & Co. from 1989 to 2001, including as a managing director of investment banking. The foregoing directorships and committee memberships include public companies or registered investment companies directorships and committee memberships currently held by Mr. Berman or which Mr. Berman held at any time during the past five years.

Education: Mr. Berman graduated from the Columbia University Graduate School of Business with a Master of Business Administration, the Boston University School of Law with a Juris Doctor, and Binghamton University with a Bachelors of Arts in History.

Board Qualifications: Based on Mr. Berman’s significant executive and industry experience with public real estate companies, as well as his experience as a director and audit committee member of several public companies, including a national real estate investment trust, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors concluded that Mr. Berman has the requisite experience, qualifications, attributes and skills necessary to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Lisa Myers, a director nominee, has served as a member of the Board of Directors since June 2019. Ms. Myers currently serves as the chair of the Executive Compensation and Option Committee of the Board of Directors.

Business Experience: Ms. Myers is the co-founder and managing partner of Clerisy, a new global private equity firm in the consumer and tech-sumer space. Since 2017, she has served as a director of Steiner Leisure Corp., a private company. From 2017 to February of 2020, she served as a director of John Hardy, a private company. Until recently, Lisa was a partner at L Catterton, the largest consumer focused private equity firm in the world, where she focused on the flagship fund. From 2016 to 2019, Ms. Myers served on the board of Debenhams PLC, a company traded on the London Stock Exchange. Prior to joining L Catterton, from 2015 to 2016, Ms. Myers served as Co-Head of Global Partnership Investing at BTG Pactual, an investment strategy firm specializing in purchasing minority stakes in privately-held and publicly-traded companies to provide transformative capital. Prior to BTG Pactual, Ms. Myers served at Franklin Templeton for nineteen years, where she was an Executive Vice-President and lead portfolio manager of some of Templeton’s flagship global equity funds and institutional accounts, managing or co-managing more than $10 billion of assets. After Templeton, before entering the investment management industry, Ms. Myers practiced corporate and real estate law with Willkie, Farr & Gallagher in New York City, where she was involved in initial public offerings, mergers and acquisitions, loan initiations and restructurings and other securities-related transactions. The foregoing directorships and committee memberships include public companies or registered investment companies directorships and committee memberships currently held by Ms. Myers or which Ms. Myers held at any time during the past five years.

Education and Professional Affiliations: Ms. Myers received a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Pennsylvania and a Juris Doctor degree from the Georgetown University Law Center and is a Chartered Financial Analyst.

Board Qualifications: Based on Ms. Myers’ significant investment and private equity experience, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors concluded that Ms. Myers has the requisite experience, qualifications, attributes and skills necessary to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Laura H. Pomerantz, a director nominee, has served as a member of the Board of Directors since June 2019. Ms. Pomerantz currently serves as a member of the Executive Compensation and Option Committee of the Board of Directors and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors.

Business Experience: Since 2005, Ms. Pomerantz has served on the board of directors of G-III Apparel Group Limited, a publicly traded company listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, and currently serves as a member of its compensation committee. Since 2007, Ms. Pomerantz has served on the board of directors of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., a publicly traded REIT listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, and currently serves as chair of its compensation committee. Since 2014, Ms. Pomerantz has served as Vice Chairman, Head of Strategic Accounts at Cushman & Wakefield, a large commercial real estate services company. The foregoing directorships and committee memberships are the only public company or registered investment company directorships and committee memberships currently held by Ms. Pomerantz or which Ms. Pomerantz held at any time during the past five years. Ms. Pomerantz is a founding member of Laura Pomerantz Real Estate, LLC, a real estate firm offering commercial real estate advisory and execution services, and since 2013 she has served as a principal of the firm. She has previously served as its CEO. From 2001 until 2013, Ms. Pomerantz was a principal of PBS Real Estate, LLC, a real estate firm offering commercial real estate advisory and execution services. Prior to working at PBS Real Estate, LLC, Ms. Pomerantz served as a Senior Managing Director at Newmark & Company Real Estate, with senior level responsibilities for major tenant representation assignments. Prior to that, Ms. Pomerantz served as the Executive Vice President of The Leslie Fay Companies for eighteen years. Previously, Ms. Pomerantz also served on the board of directors of AREA Properties, the former Apollo Real Estate. She is also the exclusive and national representative for Ted Baker/London, Levi Strauss & Company, Gant, and Vince. Other major clients include Monica Rich Kosann, Berns Communication Group, John Paul, and International Well Building Institute. Ms. Pomerantz has also represented Abercrombie & Fitch for flagships in the United States and internationally and has completed deals on their behalf in Milan, Paris, Hamburg, Dusseldorf, Brussels, Copenhagen, Dublin, London and Madrid. Ms. Pomerantz is currently completing the leasing for 161 Fifth Avenue - an 85,775-sf office retail building in Flatiron, NY. From 1994 to 2017, Ms. Pomerantz served on the board of directors for The Carnegie Hall Corporation and is currently an Honorary Trustee.

Education: Ms. Pomerantz received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Miami Dade Community College.

Board Qualifications: Based on Ms. Pomerantz’s twenty-two years of executive-level commercial real estate experience and significant background in retail and manufacturing, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors concluded that Ms. Pomerantz has the requisite experience, qualifications, attributes and skills necessary to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Irvin D. Reid, a director nominee, has served as a member of the Board of Directors since 1994. Dr. Reid serves as the chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and as a member of the Executive Compensation and Option Committee of the Board of Directors. He also serves as chair of the Special Committee appointed by the Board of Directors to provide assistance and oversight to management in reviewing acquisition proposals that may be received from interested parties. From 1998 through 2002, Dr. Reid served as chairman of the Audit Committee.

Business Experience: Dr. Reid has served as a member of the Board of Directors and as a member of both the Audit and Nomination/Governance Committees of The Pep Boys from 2007 to 2012. Previously, Dr. Reid served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Handleman Company from 2003 to 2008, where he served as a member of the Audit and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees. Dr. Reid also served as a member of the Board of Directors, a member of the Audit Committee, and chair or Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the A. Schulman Company (now LyondellBasell) from 2010 to 2017. Dr. Reid served on the Board of the Downtown Economic Development Corporation of the City of Detroit from 1999 through 2015. He currently serves on the Board and Audit Committee of the Detroit Institute of Arts. Dr. Reid has served as a member of the Board of Directors of Fleet Bank, Natwest Bank New Jersey, and Natwest Bank USA from 1990 to 2002 and was chair of the Trust Committee. He was a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Chicago Detroit Branch, from 2003 to 2008. From 2000 to 2011, Dr. Reid served as a member of The Michigan Economic Development Corporation Board and its Executive and Finance Committees. Dr. Reid also previously served on the Board of First Tennessee Bank of Chattanooga. The foregoing directorships and committee memberships include public or registered investment companies currently held or which were held by Dr. Reid at any time during the past five years or earlier. Dr. Reid is President Emeritus of Wayne State University in Michigan, having served as President from 1997 to 2008 when he became Inaugural Holder of the Eugene Applebaum Chair in Community Engagement and director of the Forum on Contemporary Issues in Society. Prior to becoming the President of Wayne State University, where he served from 1989 to 1997, Dr. Reid served as President of Montclair State University in New Jersey, and from 1983 to 1989 held positions of Dean, School of Business Administration, and John Stagmaier Professor of Economics and Business Administration at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. He is currently a private investor in residential apartments in Detroit and a partner with American Community Developers, Inc., in the development of affordable housing in Brush Watson Park, a mixed income community in Midtown Detroit where he and his wife reside.

Education: Dr. Reid earned Masters and Ph.D. degrees in business and applied economics from The Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania and B.S. and M.S. degrees in psychology from Howard University.

Board Qualifications: Based on Dr. Reid’s familiarity with the Company as a long-standing member of the Company’s Board of Directors and his experience as a director of several public and private companies, including residential property development, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors concluded that Dr. Reid has the requisite experience, interests, qualifications, attributes and skills necessary to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Rebecca Robertson, a director nominee, has served as a member of the Board of Directors since September 2016. Ms. Robertson currently serves as a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors and the Executive Compensation and Option Committee of the Board of Directors, and has previously served as a member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

Business Experience: Since 2007, Ms. Robertson has served as the Chief Executive Officer and President of Park Avenue Armory in New York, New York. Prior to that, Ms. Robertson served as the Executive Director of the Lincoln Development Project, Inc. from 2000 to 2006. From 1997 to 2000, Ms. Robertson served as an executive with The Shubert Organization (New York’s largest Broadway theater owner), responsible for real estate and new activities construction. In addition to leading the redevelopment of the Lincoln Center, Ms. Robertson also previously led the urban renewal project of the thirteen acres around 42nd Street between Seventh and Eighth Avenues, serving as President of The 42nd Street Development Project, Inc. from 1987 through 1997. Ms. Robertson sits on the boards of directors of privately held not for profit companies CalArts and Park Avenue Armory. Ms. Robertson previously served on the Board of Directors for The New 42nd Street, Inc. The foregoing directorships and committee memberships include public companies or registered investment companies directorships and committee memberships currently held by Ms. Robertson or which Ms. Robertson held at any time during the past five years.

Education: Ms. Robertson received her B.A. and M.Sc. Pl. from the University of Toronto.

Board Qualifications: Based on Ms. Robertson’s experience overseeing major urban development projects, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors concluded that Ms. Robertson has the requisite experience, qualifications, attributes and skills necessary to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Howard Roth, a director nominee, has been nominated for his first election to the Board of Directors.

Business Experience: Mr. Roth is a certified public accountant and the Principal and Founder of HSR Advisors, a consulting firm providing strategic and financial advice to real estate organizations. Mr. Roth previously spent thirty-two years in a variety of positions with Ernst & Young (including nine years with predecessor firm Kenneth Leventhal & Co.) advising major public and private real estate clients on judicial and non-judicial reorganizations, mergers and acquisitions, forensic analysis and tax and entity structuring. He was the Global Sector Leader of the firm’s Real Estate, Hospitality & Construction (RHC) practice. In this role, he led all of Ernst & Young’s RHC service lines -- assurance, tax, transactions and advisory. During this tenure, he grew the firm’s RHC revenues to more than $2.0 billion and led the development of Ernst & Young’s digital offerings to real estate clients, including Smart Buildings, Cybersecurity and Data Analytics. Mr. Roth is a member of the board of trustees and is chair of the audit committee and a member of the nominating and governance committee of Lexington Realty Trust. The foregoing directorships and committee memberships include public companies or registered investment companies directorships and committee memberships currently held by Mr. Roth or which Mr. Roth held at any time during the past five years.

Education and Professional Affiliations: Mr. Roth graduated from Hofstra University with a Bachelor of Business Administration and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and the New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants ( NYSSCPA).

Board Qualifications: Based on Mr. Roth’s significant financial and accounting background and thirty-two years of experience in public accounting, as well as his experience as a trustee and an audit committee member for a national diversified REIT, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors concluded that Mr. Roth has the requisite experience, qualifications, attributes and skills necessary to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Gail Steinel, a director nominee, has been nominated for her first election to the Board of Directors.

Business Experience: Ms. Steinel is the owner of Executive Advisors, a management consulting firm that provides consulting services to chief executives and senior officers and leadership seminars and speeches to various organizations. Previously, Ms. Steinel served as Executive Vice President of Global Commercial Services of BearingPoint, a management and technology consulting services firm. Prior to joining BearingPoint, she spent twenty-three years with Arthur Andersen LLP, most recently serving as Global Managing Partner of Business Consulting. In that role, she managed 10,000 employees and led her team through its sale to KPMG Consulting. From 2009 until February 2020, Ms. Steinel served as a member of the board of MTS Systems Corporation, where she served as chair of the governance and nominating committee as well as a member of the audit committee. Since 2006, she also has served on the board of Federal Realty Investment Trust, where she is chair of the audit committee and a member of the compensation committee. The foregoing directorships and committee memberships include public companies or registered investment companies directorships and committee memberships currently held by Ms. Steinel or which Ms. Steinel held at any time during the past five years.

Education and Professional Affiliations: Ms. Steinel graduated from Rutgers University with a Bachelor’s in Accounting. She also is a certified public accountant.

Board Qualifications: Based on Ms. Steinel’s significant executive experience as a management consultant and accounting experience, as well as over her fourteen-years tenure serving on the board of a public REIT, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors concluded that Ms. Steinel has the requisite experience, qualifications, attributes and skills necessary to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Lee Wielansky, a director nominee, has been nominated for his first election to the Board of Directors.

Business Experience: Mr. Wielansky currently serves as Chairman and CEO of Midland Development Group, Inc., and brings more than forty years of commercial real estate investment, management and development experience. In addition, he currently serves as CEO of the Opportunistic Equities LLC, Midland Development Group’s business specializing in low income housing. Previously, he served as President and CEO of JDN Development Company, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of JDN Realty Corporation. Before joining JDN, he served as Managing Director – Investments of Regency Centers Corporation. Since 2015, Mr. Wielansky has served as a member of the board of directors of Brookdale Senior Living and as chairman of the board’s investments committee as well as a member of its audit committee and was its chairman of the board from February 2018 until December 2019. Since 1999, he has served as a member of the board of trustees of Acadia Realty Trust served as its lead trustee since 2004, and currently serves as a member of its investment and capital markets committee. He previously served as a member of the boards of Isle of Capri, Inc. and Pulaski Financial Corp. The foregoing directorships and committee memberships include public companies or registered investment companies directorships and committee memberships currently held by Mr. Wielansky or which Mr. Wielansky held at any time during the past five years.

Education: Mr. Wielansky graduated from the University of Missouri with a Bachelor of Business Administration in Real Estate and Finance.

Board Qualifications: Based on Mr. Wielansky’s extensive commercial real estate investment, management and development experience, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors concluded that Mr. Wielansky has the requisite experience, qualifications, attributes and skills necessary to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Vote Required and Board of Directors’ Recommendation

Bow Street has nominated eight persons, including four individuals currently serving on the Board of Directors, for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting in opposition to the nominees recommended by our Board of Directors, making this a contested election. In a contested election, the Company’s bylaws provide that the election will be determined on a plurality voting standard, with the eleven nominees that receive the greatest number of “FOR” votes elected to the Board of Directors. Abstentions, failures to vote and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of the director elections. Voting “withhold” with respect to a Bow Street nominee on its proxy card is NOT the same as voting “FOR” the Board of Directors’ nominees on the WHITE proxy card because voting “withhold” on a Bow Street nominee on its Gold proxy card will revoke any previous proxy submitted by you, including any vote you may have made for the Board of Directors’ nominees. The only way to support the Board of Directors’ nominees is to vote “FOR” the Board of Directors’ nominees on the WHITE proxy card and to disregard, and not return, any Gold proxy card that you receive from Bow Street. See “Policies Relating to the Election of Directors.”

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE BY SIGNING, DATING AND RETURNING THE WHITE PROXY CARD. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS DOES NOT ENDORSE ANY BOW STREET NOMINEES AND URGES YOU NOT TO VOTE USING THE GOLD PROXY CARD SENT TO YOU BY BOW STREET, EVEN AS A PROTEST VOTE AGAINST BOW STREET AND ITS DIRECTOR NOMINEES.

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Beneficial Ownership

Set forth below is certain information as of April 16, 2020, including information with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Common Stock, for (i) the members of the Board of Directors, (ii)our director nominees for election at the Annual Meeting, (iii) the executive officers of the Company and (iv) the directors and executive officers of the Company as a group:

Biographical Information Concerning Directors

Biographical information concerning the current members of our Board of Directors is set forth below.

William L. Mack has served as a member of the Board of Directors since 1997 and as its Chairman since 2000. Prior to December 1997, Mr. Mack served as President and Senior Managing Partner of The Mack Company, where he pioneered the development of large, Class A office properties and helped to increase The Mack Company’s portfolio to approximately 20 million square feet. In addition, Mr. Mack is a founder and Chairman of Mack Real Estate Group. He also founded and was the former Chairman of AREA Property Partners (f/k/a Apollo Real Estate Advisors, L.P.). Mr. Mack currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Hudson’s Bay Company, which ceased to be a publicly traded company in March 2020. Mr. Mack previously served as a member of the board of directors of FCB Financial Holdings, Inc. from October 2010 until its sale in December 2018. He previously served as a board member of the Regional Advisory Board of JPMorgan Chase from 1995 to 2013. The foregoing directorships are the only public company or registered investment company directorships currently held by Mr. Mack or which Mr. Mack held at any time during the past five years. Previously, Mr. Mack served as a member of the boards of directors of City and Suburban Financial Corporation from 1988 to 2007, The Bear Stearns Companies Inc. from 1997 to 2004, Vail Resorts, Inc. from 1993 to 2004, Wyndham International, Inc. from 1999 to 2005 and Retail Opportunity Investments Corporation from 2009 to 2010. Mr. Mack is the Vice Chairman of Northwell Health Inc. (f/k/a the North Shore Long Island Jewish Health System), and Chairman of the Board and member of the compensation committee for the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation. He is the former Vice Chairman and Emeritus Trustee of the University of Pennsylvania and Chair Emeritus of the Board of Overseers of The Wharton School of Business and Finance at the University of Pennsylvania. He is a director of the Palm Beach Civic Association, and Member of the Western Regional Executive Council of Lenox Hill Hospital. Mr. Mack attended The Wharton School and has a B.S. degree in business administration, finance and real estate from New York University.

Michael J. DeMarco. Biographical information for Mr. DeMarco, a director nominee and our Chief Executive Officer, is set forth above under the caption “Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors.”

Alan R. Batkin has served as a member of the Board of Directors since June 2019. Mr. Batkin currently serves as a member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Mr. Batkin has served on the Board of Directors of Pattern Energy Group Inc. since 2013, and he currently serves as a member of its Audit Committee and Conflicts Committee, and chairman of its Nominating, Governance & Compensation Committee. Mr. Batkin has also served on the Board of Directors of Omnicom Group Inc. since 2008, and as a director of Cantel Medical Corp. since 2004. Mr. Batkin currently serves as a member of the Audit Committee, Chairman of the Compensation Committee and Lead Director of Cantel Medical Corp. Mr. Batkin previously served on the Board of Directors of Hasbro, Inc. from 1992 until 2017. The foregoing directorships and committee memberships include public companies or registered investment companies directorships and committee memberships currently held by Mr. Batkin or which Mr. Batkin held at any time during the past five years. Previously, Mr. Batkin served as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Converse Associates, Inc., a strategic advisory firm, from 2013 until 2019. From 2007 until 2012, Mr. Batkin served as Vice Chairman of Eton Park Capital Management, L.P., a global multi-disciplinary investment firm. Previously, from 1990 until 2006, Mr. Batkin served as Vice Chairman of Kissinger Associates, Inc., a geopolitical consulting firm that advises multi-national companies. Mr. Batkin also serves as Co-Chair of the Board for Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, Chairman of Massachusetts General Center for Global Health, Chair Emeritus of the International Rescue Committee, and Trustee of The Brookings Institution, and he serves on the Executive Committee for MD Anderson Cancer Center and for the New York City Police Foundation. Mr. Batkin received a B.S. from the University of Rochester and an M.B.A. from New York University Graduate School of Business.

Alan S. Bernikow. Biographical information for Mr. Bernikow, a director nominee, is set forth above under the caption “Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors.”

Frederic Cumenal has served as a member of the Board of Directors since June 2019. Mr. Cumenal currently serves as a member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Mr. Cumenal previously served on the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee of Constellation Brands, Inc. from 2016 until 2017 and on the Board of Directors of Tiffany & Co. from 2013 until 2017. The foregoing directorships are the only public company or registered investment company directorships currently held by Mr. Cumenal or which Mr. Cumenal held at any time during the past five years. Mr. Cumenal has served on the Board of Directors of Blue Nile, Inc., an online jewelry retailer, since 2017. Previously, Mr. Cumenal served as the Chief Executive Officer of Tiffany & Co. from 2015 to 2017 and as President from 2013 to 2015, and as Executive President with responsibility for sales and global distribution from 2011 to 2013. Prior to his service at Tiffany, Mr. Cumenal served for fifteen years in senior leadership positions in LVMH Group’s wine and spirits businesses, including as President and Chief Executive Officer of Moët & Chandon, S.A. Previously, Mr. Cumenal served as Chief Executive Officer of Domaine Chandon and was Managing Director of Moët Hennessy Europe. Mr. Cumenal also served as Executive Vice President of Marketing, Strategy and Development at Ferruzi Group and was a Brand Manager at Procter & Gamble, France S.A.S. Mr. Cumenal is a graduate of Institut d’Etudes Politiques and holds an M.B.A. from Ecole Superieure des Sciences Economiques et Commerciales.

MaryAnne Gilmartin has served as a member of the Board of Directors since June 2019. Ms. Gilmartin currently serves as a member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Since 2018, Ms. Gilmartin has served as a member of the board of directors of the global investment banking firm Jefferies Financial Group Inc., where she is also a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Risk and Liquidity Oversight Committee, and the ESG Oversight Committee. Since 2014, Ms. Gilmartin has served on the board of Jefferies Group, LLC. The foregoing directorships and committee memberships are the only public company or registered investment company directorships and committee memberships currently held by Ms. Gilmartin or which Ms. Gilmartin held at any time during the past five years. Ms. Gilmartin is Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer of MAG Partners, a New York-based real estate development company she founded in 2020. Prior to founding MAG Partners, MaryAnne was CEO of L&L MAG, a company she co-founded with David Levinson and Robert Lapidus, founders of L&L Holding Company. After a successful two-year partnership, MaryAnne spun out of L&L MAG to launch on her own. MaryAnne previously served as President & CEO of Forest City Ratner Companies, where she oversaw a period of game-changing ground-up development and managed its multimillion square foot residential, commercial and retail portfolio. In her tenure at Forest City Ratner Companies, Ms. Gilmartin spearheaded the development of some of the most high-profile real estate projects in New York City. She led the efforts to build Barclays Center, the state-of-the-art sports and entertainment venue and the centerpiece of the $4.9 billion, 22-acre mixed-use Pacific Park Brooklyn development. She also oversaw the development of The New York Times Building, designed by world-renowned architect Renzo Piano; New York by Gehry, designed by award winning architect Frank Gehry; and the Tata Innovation Center at Cornell Tech, a brand-new office building that is a first-of-its-kind space for tech innovation, designed by Weiss/Manfredi on Roosevelt Island. She is also a civic leader in New York, serving as Chair Emeritus of the Downtown Brooklyn Partnership, member of the Executive Committee of The Brooklyn Academy of Music, Vice Chair of New York Public Radio, member of the Executive Committee and Board of Governors of The Real Estate Board of New York, and part of the Industry Advisory Board of the MS Real Estate Development Program at Columbia University. In her role on the board of New York Public Radio, Ms. Gilmartin has directed and advised WNYC’s real estate uses, including its broadcast studios. Ms. Gilmartin graduated with a B.A. in Political Science, summa cum laude, and a Master’s of Public Administration, both from Fordham University.

Nori Gerardo Lietz has served as a member of the Board of Directors since June 2019. Ms. Lietz currently serves as a member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Ms. Gerardo Lietz is a Senior Lecturer of Business Administration in the Finance and Entrepreneurial Management Units at Harvard Business School, where she currently teaches Real Estate Private Equity and Venture Capital Private Equity. Ms. Gerardo Lietz is the President of Areté Capital, a real estate advisory firm she founded in 2010. Ms. Gerardo Lietz also currently serves as a director of Jaguar Capital S.A.S., a private real estate investment firm in Columbia. Previously, Ms. Gerardo Lietz served as the Chairman of the Advisory Board of Allele Fund in 2011. Ms. Gerardo Lietz was a Partner and Chief Strategist for Private Real Estate and a member of the firm’s Global Investment Committee at Partners Group Holding AG from 2007 to 2011. Ms. Gerardo Lietz co-founded Pension Consulting Alliance, Inc. in 1998 and served as a Managing Director while developing its real estate investment management and advisory activities until 2007. In 1985, Ms. Gerardo Lietz co-founded Public Storage Institutional, Inc., an institutional money management firm deploying pension capital to acquire real estate assets, where she served as Senior Vice President until 1988. Ms. Gerardo Lietz practiced law in the corporate department of Paul Hastings LLP from 1982 to 1985. Ms. Gerardo Lietz is a former member of the Pension Real Estate Association Board of Directors and the Real Estate Research Institute Board of Directors. Ms. Gerardo Lietz received an A.B. with honors from Stanford University in 1979 and a J.D. from the UCLA School of Law in 1982, where she was Chief Comment Editor of the UCLA Law Review.

Lisa Myers. Biographical information for Ms. Myers, a director nominee, is set forth above under the caption “Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors.”

Laura H. Pomerantz. Biographical information for Ms. Pomerantz, a director nominee, is set forth above under the caption “Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors.”

Irvin D. Reid. Biographical information for Mr. Reid, a director nominee, is set forth above under the caption “Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors.”

Rebecca Robertson. Biographical information for Ms. Robertson, a director nominee, is set forth above under the caption “Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors.”

Biographical Information Concerning Executive Officers

Biographical information concerning our executive officers is set forth below.

Michael J. DeMarco. Biographical information for Mr. DeMarco, our Chief Executive Officer, is set forth above under the caption “Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors.”

Marshall B. Tycher serves as Chairman of the Company’s Roseland Residential Trust (“Roseland”) subsidiary and previously served as President of Roseland from October 2012 to February 2016. Mr. Tycher co-founded Roseland in 1992 and served as its President until its acquisition by the Company in October 2012. Prior to co-founding Roseland, Mr. Tycher served in various capacities with Lincoln Property Company from 1979 to 1992, including as Texas operating partner from 1981 to 1987, and as head of Lincoln Northeast Residential, Inc. from 1987 to 1992. Mr. Tycher received a BSBA from the University of Denver, a Juris Doctorate from Southern Methodist University and is a member of the Texas State Bar.

David J. Smetana has served as Chief Financial Officer since February 2018. Mr. Smetana has over 21 years of real estate experience across a variety of roles. Most recently, he was a managing director and REIT securities analyst on Morgan Stanley Investment Management’s Global REIT Securities Team from 2001 to 2017. Previously, Mr. Smetana was a REIT investment banker at Morgan Stanley and was part of Morgan Stanley’s Real Estate Special Situations Fund from 1997 to 2001. Mr. Smetana received his Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and holds a CPA certificate in Virginia.

Giovanni M. DeBari was appointed Chief Accounting Officer of the Company in March 2019. Mr. DeBari has served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller of the Company since 2015, and previously served as Vice President, Corporate Controller and as Assistant Corporate Controller since joining the Company in 1996. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. DeBari worked as a senior auditor specializing in real estate at the international accounting and consulting firm of PriceWaterhouseCoopers. Mr. DeBari is a certified public accountant with a Bachelor of Science from Rutgers Business School at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and of the New Jersey Society of Certified Public Accountants.

Gary T. Wagner has served as General Counsel and Secretary since May 2014 and as Vice President, Legal from November 2011 to May 2014. As General Counsel, Mr. Wagner manages the Company’s legal affairs, including corporate governance, supervising outside legal counsel, overseeing risk management, ensuring environmental and legal compliance and the preparation of required disclosure documents. Mr. Wagner previously worked at the Robert Martin Company from 1989 until its acquisition by the Company in 1997, and has worked for the Company since 1997 and has held positions as assistant general counsel, associate general counsel, and senior associate general counsel. Prior to working for the Robert Martin Company, Mr. Wagner was an associate in the real estate department of Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl in New York City. He started his career as an associate in the real estate department in the Philadelphia office of Blank Rome. Mr. Wagner received his Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and Economics from Queens College and his Juris Doctor, cum laude, from Temple University.

Ricardo Cardoso has served as Chief Investment Officer since September 2015 and has served in various capacities with the Company since 1997, most recently as Vice President of acquisitions. Prior to joining the company, Mr. Cardoso worked at the Robert Martin Company from 1994 to 1997. As Chief Investment Officer, Mr. Cardoso is responsible for sourcing new real estate acquisitions and identifying opportunities within the Company’s portfolio for asset repositioning or disposition. Mr. Cardoso has a Bachelor of Business Administration in Finance from Iona College and is a member of NAIOP New Jersey and the real estate board of the March of Dimes, New Jersey chapter.

Nicholas Hilton has served as the Executive Vice President, Leasing since February 2018. Mr. Hilton was a senior vice president at CBRE, where he had been for over 13 years and worked with firms like Mack-Cali, Bentall Kennedy, Royal Bank of Canada, Ernst & Young and The Boston Consulting Group. Mr. Hilton received his Bachelor of Arts in English from Rutgers University.

Deidre Crockett was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer for the Company effective January 1, 2020. She joined Mack-Cali in 2012. Mrs. Crockett is responsible for public relations, marketing, human resources, and investor relations. She has also served as the Company's senior vice president of corporate communications and investor relations. Prior to joining Mack-Cali, Mrs. Crockett had her own consultancy firm providing advisory services in the areas of marketing, sales strategies, and leasing to European companies looking to enter the United States.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Mack Agreement. In connection with the Company’s combination with The Mack Company in December 1997, the Company has entered into an agreement (the “Mack Agreement”) with members of the Mack Group. The “Mack Group” includes William L. Mack, Chairman of the Board of Directors, David S. Mack, a former director of the Company, Earle I. Mack, a former director of the Company, and Frederic Mack, a member of the Advisory Board of the Company. Pursuant to the Mack Agreement, members of the Mack Group previously had the right to designate up to three members of the Board of Directors. On August 1, 2019, the Company and members of the Mack Group entered into an amendment to the Mack Agreement, pursuant to which the members of the Mack Group have agreed, effectively immediately, to terminate their rights to designate or nominate any members of the Board under the Mack Agreement.

Tax Protection Agreements. Through February 2016, the Company could not dispose of or distribute certain of its properties which were originally contributed by certain unrelated common unitholders of the Operating Partnership, without the express written consent of such common unitholders except in a manner which would not result in recognition of any built-in-gain (which may result in an income tax liability) or which reimbursed the appropriate specific common unitholders for the tax consequences of the recognition of such built-in-gains (collectively, the “Property Lock-Ups”). The aforementioned restrictions did not apply in the event that the Company sold all of its properties or in connection with a sale transaction which the Company’s Board of Directors determined was reasonably necessary to satisfy a material monetary default on any unsecured debt, judgment or liability of the Company or to cure any material monetary default on any mortgage secured by a property. The Property Lock-Ups expired in February 2016.

Upon the expiration of the Property Lock-Ups, the Company is generally required to use commercially reasonable efforts to prevent any sale, transfer or other disposition of the subject properties from resulting in the recognition of built-in gain to the specific common unitholders, which include members of the Mack Group, the Robert Martin Group (which includes Robert F. Weinberg, a former director of the Company and current member of the Company’s Advisory Board), and the Cali Group (which includes John R. Cali, a former director of the Company and current member of the Company’s Advisory Board). As of December 31, 2019, 27 of the Company’s properties, as well as certain land and development projects, including properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2019, with an aggregate net book value of approximately $1.9 billion, have lapsed restrictions and are subject to these conditions.

Acquisitions and Other Transactions. Certain directors and executive officers of the Company (or members of their immediate families or related trusts) and persons who hold more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock (or Units in the Operating Partnership) had direct or indirect interests in certain transactions involving the Company, the Operating Partnership or their affiliates in the last fiscal year, as follows:

Policies and Procedures. The Company has a written policy with respect to the review, approval and ratification of related person transactions. This policy applies to any transaction, arrangement or relationship (including any indebtedness or guarantee of indebtedness), or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships, in which (i) the Company is a participant and (ii) any “related person” (defined as an employee, director, director nominee, an executive officer or someone who owns more than 5% of our common shares, or an immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons, with certain exceptions) has or will have a direct or indirect interest. Under the policy, the Company’s General Counsel will determine whether a transaction meets the definition of a related person transaction that will require review by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will review all related person transactions referred to them and, based on the relevant facts and circumstances, will decide whether or not to approve such transactions. Only those transactions that are in, or are not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders will be approved. If the Company becomes aware of an existing related person transaction that was not approved under this policy, the matter will be referred to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and it will evaluate all options available, including ratification, amendment or termination of the transaction.

The Company has determined that, under the policy, the following types of transactions will be deemed to be pre-approved: (i) employment of an executive officer if the related compensation is required to be reported in the Company’s proxy statement; (ii) employment of an executive officer if he or she is not an immediate family member of another executive officer or director of the Company, the related compensation would have been reported in the Company’s proxy statement if he or she was a “named executive officer” and the Company’s Executive Compensation and Option Committee approved (or recommended that the Board approve) such compensation; (iii) compensation paid to a director if the compensation is required to be reported in the Company’s proxy statement; (iv) any transaction where the related person’s interest arises solely from the ownership of the Common Stock and all holders of the Common Stock received the same benefit on a pro rata basis; (v) any transaction in which the rates or charges incurred are subject to governmental regulation; and (vi) any transaction involving bank depositary of funds, transfer agent, registrar, trustee under a trust indenture or similar services.

Under the policy, the General Counsel’s determination of whether a transaction meets the definition of a related person transaction is based upon his assessment of the transaction under Item 404 of Regulation S-K without regard to the amounts involved. The Company’s policy provides that any related person transaction referred to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for consideration is evaluated based on all of the relevant facts and circumstances available, including (if applicable) but not limited to: (i) the benefits to the Company; (ii) the impact on a director’s independence in the event the related person is a director, an immediate family member of a director or an entity in which a director is a partner, shareholder or executive officer; (iii) the availability of other sources for comparable products or services; (iv) the terms of the transaction; and (v) the terms available to unrelated third parties or to employees generally.

The policy prohibits a director from participating in any review, consideration or approval of any related person transaction with respect to which the director or any of his or her immediate family members is the related person. The policy also provides that the only transactions that may be approved are those transactions that are in, or are not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Independence of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors has adopted the NYSE’s standards for determining the independence of its members and believes that it interprets these requirements conservatively. In applying these standards, the Board of Directors considers commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships, among others, in assessing the independence of directors, and must disclose any basis for determining that a relationship is not material. The Board of Directors has determined that nine of eleven of its current members, namely Alan Batkin, Alan S. Bernikow, Frederic Cumenal, MaryAnne Gilmartin, Nori Gerardo Lietz, Lisa Myers, Laura Pomerantz, Irvin D. Reid, and Rebecca Robertson are independent directors within the meaning of such NYSE independence standards in terms of independence from management. Additionally, the Board of Directors has determined that, if elected to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting, each of Z. Jamie Behar, Michael Berman, Howard Roth, Gail Steinel, and Lee Wielansky will be an independent director, such that if all of the Board of Directors’ eleven director nominees are elected at the Annual Meeting, ten of the eleven directors will be independent. In making this determination, the Board of Directors did not exclude from consideration as immaterial any relationship potentially compromising the independence of any of the above directors or director nominees.

Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Achievements and Initiatives

The Company is dedicated to responsible environmental, social and community stewardship as an essential part of our mission to build a successful business and to shape the communities we serve throughout our portfolio, in addition to our workplace community. Below are some highlights of our commitment to ESG principles.

Environmental

The Board of Directors believes that continued growth of stockholder value in a socially responsible manner is consistent with the Company’s overall strategy to continue to enhance the Company’s reputation as a property manager of choice and promotes an environmental strategy that supports “green” building initiatives. The Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) encourages companies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and conserve energy through what is now a voluntary program, Energy Star. The Company has been an Energy Star partner since the inception of the program in 1999. As such, the Company is required to, among other things, further track and benchmark its energy performance and broaden its plan to reduce energy intensity across its properties by following the energy management strategy available through Energy Star. We also have engaged Logical Buildings, a smart building software and solutions company, to maximize sustainability efforts across our residential portfolio. In addition, we have undertaken a number of green initiatives that not only conserve energy and reduce waste, but also offer our tenants cost-effective incentives to promote sustainability efforts throughout our portfolio, including the following:

Social

We seek to foster a workplace where our employees are treated fairly and are highly motivated to succeed by:

In addition, whether through time, effort or monetary donations, we are committed to nourishing the betterment of the communities we serve, and our employees play active roles in numerous charitable organizations. To encourage and support our employees’ philanthropy, we host an annual charity day and provide paid-time off for our employees attending charity events. As a company, we have regularly supported the following philanthropic causes:

Governance Matters

We are dedicated to maintaining a high standard for corporate governance predicated on integrity, ethics, diversity and transparency. Our commitment to diversity is apparent by our Board composition, of our current nine independent directors and proposed slate of directors for election at the Annual Meeting, one is African American and five are female. Additionally, as part of our efforts to minimize environmental and social risks, we established an environmental, societal and governance management committee consisting of executive officers and employees to help lead the effort in identifying and implementing policies that will improve our environmental, social and community stewardship and workplace environment.

Our Board of Directors remains committed to the highest standard for corporate governance. In 2018, in response to stockholder feedback solicited as part of our stockholder outreach efforts, we amended our bylaws to improve our corporate governance policies and procedures. Our amended and restated bylaws now generally allow stockholders to propose amendments to the bylaws for approval by the stockholders. Our bylaws also provide for majority voting in the election of directors, whereby each director nominee that is not elected by a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election of directors is now required to tender his or her resignation for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Additionally, since January 1, 2019, we have engaged in significant stockholder outreach efforts, including our management team attending six investor conferences, the Company hosting an investor day which was attended by 60 institutional investors, and members of management and the Board of Directors soliciting feedback from over 100 institutional investors. As a result of this stockholder outreach, in 2019 William L. Mack and certain of his affiliates agreed to terminate their rights to designate or nominate any members of the Board of Directors, and we amended our charter to opt out of Maryland’s unsolicited takeover statute, which permits the Board of Directors to re-classify itself without a stockholder vote. Our stockholder outreach has continued into 2020 and is ongoing.

During 2019, the entire Board of Directors met six times and once acted by unanimous written consent. In 2019, no director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and all committees of the Board of Directors on which he or she served. The Company does not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of the Board of Directors at the annual meetings of stockholders, but the Company strongly encourages all members of the Board of Directors to attend its annual meetings and expects such attendance except in the event of exigent circumstances. All of the members of the Board of Directors at the time of the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders (the “2019 Annual Meeting”) were in attendance at the 2019 Annual Meeting.

Currently, the Company has separated the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. The Company believes that at this time the separation of these roles permits the Chairman of the Board to focus on oversight of the Company’s long-term corporate development goals while the Chief Executive Officer focuses on the strategic direction of the Company and oversees the day to day performance of the other executive officers in executing the Company’s business plan. In addition, in March 2014, the Board of Directors appointed Alan S. Bernikow as its Lead Independent Director. The Lead Independent Director acts as a liaison between the Chairman of the Board and the independent directors and advises the Chairman of the Board with respect to the quality, quantity and timeliness of the flow of information from management as necessary for the independent directors to perform their duties effectively and responsibly, including requesting that certain material be included in materials prepared for the Board of Directors, approving agendas for meetings of the Board of Directors, and ensuring that there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items at meetings of the Board of Directors. Stockholders may contact the Lead Independent Director as further described below under the heading “Stockholder Communications,” and if requested by significant stockholders, the Lead Independent Director shall be available for consultation. The Board of Directors believes that its Lead Independent Director structure, including the duties and responsibilities described above, provides the same independent leadership, oversight, and benefits for the Company and the Board of Directors that would be provided by an independent Chairman of the Board.

The Lead Independent Director also presides at all meetings of the Board of Directors at which the Chairman of the Board is not present and all Executive Sessions of the Board of Directors consisting only of non-management directors. Such Executive Sessions are held at least once per year, periodically as determined by the non-management directors, and typically occur immediately following the regularly scheduled quarterly meetings of the Board of Directors, or at any other time and place as the Lead Independent Director or non-management directors may determine. Interested parties may submit matters for consideration to the non-management directors by utilizing the procedures identified under “Stockholder Communications” in this Proxy Statement. During 2019, the non-management directors met in Executive Session four times.

Pursuant to authority vested in the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company’s financial risk exposure and the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies and procedures. The Audit Committee discharges its risk oversight responsibilities as part of its quarterly reviews of the Company’s quarterly and annual financial statements by discussing with management, the Company’s independent auditors and outside legal counsel the Company’s risk profile, its financial risk exposure and its risk mitigation policies and procedures. In addition, the Executive Compensation and Option Committee, in consultation with the independent compensation consultant to the Executive Compensation and Option Committee, conducts an annual risk assessment of the Company’s compensation programs as described under “Compensation Risk Assessment” in this Proxy Statement. The Company does not believe that the performance of these oversight functions by these committees has any effect on the leadership structure of the Board of Directors.

The Board of Directors has adopted equity ownership guidelines that require each non-employee director to own an aggregate amount of Common Stock, units of limited partnership interest of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. redeemable for shares of Common Stock or units under the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors equal in value to five times the annual cash retainer paid to directors, currently $325,000. Such ownership level must be achieved by the three-year anniversary of the date the director was elected to the Board of Directors. As of December 31, 2019, all directors of the Company were in compliance with the equity ownership guidelines for directors, including Mr. Batkin, Mr. Cumenal, Ms. Gilmartin, Ms. Gerardo Lietz, Ms. Myers and Ms. Pomerantz, each of whom qualifies on the basis of being within the three year transition period from his or her initial appointment to the Board of Directors in 2019.

In March 2012, the Board of Directors, on the recommendation of its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, adopted a retirement policy for directors. Pursuant to this policy, the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles provide that a director may neither stand nor be nominated for re-election to the Board of Directors after attaining the age of 80.

The Board of Directors proactively considers the overall size and composition of the Board of Directors and reviews and monitors management development and succession planning activities. The Chief Executive Officer regularly presents management’s perspective on business objectives and discusses their perspective on the Company’s deep pool of talented employees and succession planning for the Company.

The Board of Directors also has adopted a policy that provides that executive officers, employees, and directors may not acquire securities issued by the Company or any of its affiliates using borrowed funds, may not use margin in respect of securities issued by the Company or any of its affiliates, may not pledge securities issued by the Company or any of its affiliates as collateral, and may not engage in hedging or other transactions with respect to their ownership of securities issued by the Company or its affiliates, each of which the Board of Directors believes would be inconsistent with the purposes and intent of the stock ownership guidelines applicable to directors and the Chief Executive Officer.

In accordance with Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act, the Audit Committee provides for employees to contact the audit committee in writing or by telephone, on a confidential, anonymous basis, to submit concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters, and the Audit Committee has policies and procedures, subject to the Company’s internal controls, for the retention, and treatment of complaints.

Meetings of Committees of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors has three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Executive Compensation and Option Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Audit Committee. The Company has an Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee consists of Alan S. Bernikow, chairman, Alan R. Batkin, Frederic Cumenal, MaryAnne Gilmartin, and Nori Gerardo Lietz. The Audit Committee authorizes and approves the engagement of the Company’s independent registered public accountants, reviews with the Company’s independent registered public accountants the scope and results of the audit engagement, approves or establishes pre-approval policies for all professional audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the Company’s independent registered public accountants, considers the range of audit and non-audit fees, and reviews the adequacy of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures and internal audit function. The Audit Committee also assists the Board of Directors in overseeing (1) the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, (2) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (3) the quarterly evaluation of the performance of the internal audit functions performed by the Company’s internal auditors, (4) the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence, and (5) the performance of the Company’s independent registered public accountants. See “Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors” below. The Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is an “independent” director within the meaning of the NYSE Independence Standards and Rule 10A-3 promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act. The Board of Directors also has determined that each of Alan R. Batkin, Alan S. Bernikow, Frederic Cumenal, MaryAnne Gilmartin, and Nori Gerardo Lietz satisfies applicable financial literacy standards of the NYSE, and that Alan S. Bernikow qualifies as an Audit Committee Financial Expert under applicable SEC Rules. The Audit Committee met four times during 2019.

Executive Compensation and Option Committee. The Executive Compensation and Option Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) consists of Lisa Myers, chairman, Irvin D. Reid, Laura Pomerantz and Rebecca Robertson. The Compensation Committee is responsible for implementing the Company’s compensation philosophies and objectives, establishing remuneration levels for executive officers of the Company and implementing the Company’s incentive programs, including the Company’s stock option and incentive plans. The Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Compensation Committee is an “independent” director within the meaning of the NYSE Independence Standards, Rule 10C-1 promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act, and meets the “outside director” requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the “Code”), and is a “non-employee” director under Rule 16b-3 under Section 16 of the Exchange Act. The Compensation Committee met five times in 2019 and acted by unanimous written consent two times.

Pursuant to its charter, the primary purposes of the Compensation Committee are (i) to assist the Board of Directors in discharging its responsibilities in respect of compensation of the Company’s executive officers; and (ii) to review and administer the Company’s compensation and benefit programs. In addition, pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing and reviewing annual and long term corporate goals and objectives relevant to compensation of the Company’s executive officers in light of performance goals and objectives. The Compensation Committee has sole authority to determine and approve the compensation levels of the executive officers. Except for the delegation of authority to the Chief Executive Officer to grant certain de minimis equity compensation awards to non-executive employees of the Company, the Compensation Committee has not delegated, and does not delegate, any of its responsibilities to any other person. The manner in which the committee discharges its responsibilities is described under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of Irvin D. Reid, chairman, Alan S. Bernikow, and Rebecca Robertson. The Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is an “independent” director within the meaning of the NYSE Independence Standards. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met four times in 2019.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies individuals qualified to become members of the Board of Directors and recommends to the Board of Directors the slate of directors to be nominated at the Annual Meeting. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers recommendations for nominees for directorships submitted by stockholders, provided that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will not entertain stockholder nominations from stockholders who do not meet the eligibility criteria for submission of stockholder proposals under SEC Rule 14a-8 of Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act. Stockholders may submit written recommendations for Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee appointments or recommendations for nominees to the Board of Directors, together with appropriate biographical information and qualifications of such nominees, to the Company’s General Counsel following the same procedures as described in “Stockholder Communications” in this Proxy Statement. In order for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to consider a nominee for directorship submitted by a stockholder, such recommendation must be received by the General Counsel by the time period set forth in the Company’s most recent proxy statement for the submission of stockholder proposals under SEC Rule 14a-8 of Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act. The General Counsel then delivers any such communications to the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee analyzes, on an annual basis, Board member skills and attributes, and recommends to the Board of Directors appropriate individuals for nomination as Board members. Based on the Company’s strategic plan, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has developed a skills matrix to assist it in considering the appropriate balance of experience, skills and attributes required of a director and to be represented on the Board as a whole. The skills matrix is periodically reviewed and updated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates potential Board candidates against the skills matrix.

The skills matrix has two sections—a list of core criteria that every member of the Board should meet and a list of skills and attributes desired to be represented collectively on the Board. The skills matrix reflects the following core director criteria that should be satisfied by each director or nominee:

The skills matrix reflects the following skills and attributes desired to be represented collectively on the Board as a whole:

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee strives to maintain a balance of tenure on the Board of Directors. Long-serving directors bring valuable experience with our company and familiarity with the challenges it has faced over the years, while newer directors bring fresh perspective and new ideas.

Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal diversity policy, it endeavors to comprise the Board of Directors and its committees of members with a broad mix of professional and personal backgrounds. Thus, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee accords some weight to the individual professional background and experience of each director. Further, in considering nominations, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account how a candidate’s professional background would fit into the mix of experiences represented by the then-current Board of Directors. When evaluating a nominee’s overall qualifications, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not assign specific weights to particular criteria, and no particular criterion is necessarily required of all prospective nominees. In addition to the aforementioned criteria, when evaluating a director for re-nomination to the Board of Directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers the director’s history of attendance at board and committee meetings, the director’s preparation for and participation in such meetings, and the director’s tenure as a member of the Board of Directors.

Available Information

The Board of Directors has adopted written charters for the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Company makes available free of charge on or through its internet website items related to corporate governance matters, including, among other things, the Company’s corporate governance principles, charters of the various committees of the Board of Directors, and the Company’s code of business conduct and ethics applicable to all employees, officers and directors. The Company’s internet website is www.mack-cali.com. The Company intends to disclose on its internet website any amendments to or waivers from its code of business conduct and ethics as well as any amendments to its corporate governance principles or the charters of the various committees of the Board of Directors. Any stockholder also may obtain copies of these documents, free of charge, by sending a request in writing to: Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, Investor Relations Department, Harborside 3, 210 Hudson Street, Ste. 400, Jersey City, New Jersey 07311.

Stockholder Communications

Our Board of Directors casts a wide net for input to inform its decision making. As part of these efforts, the Board values input from stockholders, who both represent a broad range of views and have a financial interest in the strength of the Company.  The Company thus maintains a variety of mechanisms to enable this input and facilitate written communications from our stockholders to the Board of Directors, its committees or its members. All stockholder communications must (i) be addressed to the General Counsel of the Company, Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, Harborside 3, 210 Hudson Street, Ste. 400, Jersey City, New Jersey 07311 or at the General Counsel’s internet e-mail address at generalcounsel@mack-cali.com; (ii) be in writing either in print or electronic format; (iii) be signed by the stockholder sending the communication; (iv) indicate whether the communication is intended for a specific director(s), the entire Board of Directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Lead Independent Director, or all non-management directors; (v) if the communication relates to a stockholder proposal or director nominee, identify the number of shares held by the stockholder, the length of time such shares have been held, and the stockholder’s intention to hold or dispose of such shares, provided that the Board of Directors and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will not entertain stockholder proposals or stockholder nominations from stockholders who do not meet the eligibility and procedural criteria for submission of shareholder proposals under either SEC Rule 14a-8 of Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act or the advanced notice provisions of our bylaws; and (vi) if the communication relates to a director nominee being recommended by the stockholder, must include appropriate biographical information of the candidate. See “Submission of Stockholder Proposals.”

Upon receipt of a stockholder communication that is compliant with the requirements identified above, the General Counsel promptly delivers such communication to the appropriate board or committee member(s) identified by the stockholder as the intended recipient of such communication by forwarding the communication to either the Chairman of the Board of Directors with a copy to the Chief Executive Officer, the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, or the Lead Independent Director or all non-management directors, as the case may be.

The General Counsel may, in his sole discretion and acting in good faith, provide copies of any such stockholder communication to any one or more directors and executive officers of the Company, except that in processing any stockholder communication addressed to the Lead Independent Director or the Executive Sessions of non-management directors, the General Counsel may not copy any member of management in forwarding such communication to the Lead Independent Director.

Ability to Amend Bylaws

On March 14, 2018, the Board of Directors adopted the Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, as further amended on April 30, 2018, which amend the Company’s previous bylaws to generally allow a stockholder to propose amendments to the Company’s bylaws for approval by the stockholders at an annual or special meeting of the stockholders. Amendments to the Company’s bylaws must be submitted in compliance with the Company’s policies and procedures for stockholder communications, and are subject to approval by the stockholders by the affirmative vote of a majority of all votes entitled to be cast by the stockholders on the matter. See “Stockholder Communications” and “Submission of Stockholder Proposals.”

Policies Relating to the Election of Directors

Elections of the Board of Directors are conducted in accordance with the Company’s charter, bylaws and the laws of the state of Maryland, which provide that directors are to be elected at a meeting of the Company’s stockholders by a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election and by a plurality of votes cast in a contested election. Under the Company’s bylaws and Corporate Governance Principles, if in any uncontested election of directors a director nominee does not receive a majority of votes cast “for” his or her election, such director nominee must promptly tender his or her resignation for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will then promptly evaluate all relevant factors relating to the election results, including, but not limited to: (i) the underlying reasons why a majority of affirmative votes was not received (if ascertainable); (ii) the director’s background, experience and qualifications; (iii) the director’s length of service on the Board of Directors and contributions to the Company; and (iv) whether the director’s service on the Board of Directors is consistent with applicable regulatory requirements, listing standards, the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles and the corporate governance guidelines of independent voting advisory services such as Institutional Shareholder Services.

Subject to any applicable legal or regulatory requirements, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will, within ninety days from the date of the stockholder vote, decide whether to accept the resignation, reject the resignation or, if appropriate, conditionally reject the resignation and retain the director in office only if the underlying causes of the votes cast “against” the director can be promptly and completely cured. A full explanation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s decision will be promptly publicly disclosed in a periodic or current report filed with the SEC. Any director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to this principle and any non-independent director will not participate in the deliberations and decisions made hereunder. In addition, a director must tender his or her resignation for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee if such director’s principal occupation or business association changes substantially during his or her tenure as a director.

Bow Street has nominated eight persons, including four individuals currently serving on the Board of Directors, for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting in opposition to the nominees recommended by our Board of Directors. As a result, the election of directors at the Annual Meeting will be a contested election, in which directors will be elected by a plurality of votes cast.

Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, on behalf of the Board of Directors, serves as an independent and objective party to monitor and provide general oversight of the Company’s financial accounting and reporting process, selection of critical accounting policies, system of internal control, internal audit function, audit process for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations and the Company’s standards of business conduct. The Audit Committee performs these oversight responsibilities in accordance with its charter.

The Company’s management has primary responsibility for preparing the Company’s financial statements and the Company’s financial reporting process, including its system of internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s independent registered public accountants, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, are responsible for expressing opinions on the conformity of the Company’s 2019 audited financial statements to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. The Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accountants the overall scope and plans for its audits. The Audit Committee met with the Company’s independent registered public accountants, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

In this context, the Audit Committee hereby reports as follows:

The foregoing Audit Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material and shall not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this Audit Committee Report by reference therein. Each of the members of the Audit Committee is independent as defined under the standards of the NYSE and the SEC, and meets all other requirements of such exchange and of such rules of the SEC.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Our Company

One of the country's leading Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), Mack-Cali Realty Corporation is an owner, manager and developer of premier office and luxury multifamily properties in select waterfront and transit-oriented markets throughout New Jersey. Mack-Cali is headquartered in Jersey City, New Jersey, and is the visionary behind the city's flourishing waterfront, where the company is leading development, improvement and place-making initiatives for Harborside, a master-planned destination comprised of class A offices, luxury apartments, diverse retail and restaurants, and public spaces.

A fully-integrated and self-managed company, Mack-Cali has provided world-class management, leasing, and development services throughout New Jersey and the surrounding region for two decades. By regularly investing in its properties and innovative lifestyle amenity packages, Mack-Cali creates environments that empower tenants and residents to reimagine the way they work and live.

Our Named Executive Officers

In accordance with SEC rules, we provide enhanced disclosure of certain compensation arrangements with our “named executive officers,” which are defined by SEC rules to include our chief executive officer, Michael J. DeMarco, our chief financial officer, David J. Smetana, and our next three most highly compensated executive officers as of the end of our 2019 fiscal year, Marshall B. Tycher, Ricardo Cardoso and Gary T. Wagner.

Our Strategic Transformation

The Company is continuing to pursue a comprehensive strategic initiative that was developed by Mr. DeMarco after he joined the Company in 2015 (the “Strategic Plan”) which includes the following strategic objectives:

The Company’s Strategic Plan represents a major step in the transformation of the Company’s portfolio. The Company believes that the opportunity to invest in multi-family development properties at higher returns on cost will position the Company to potentially produce higher levels of net operating income than if the Company were to purchase only stabilized multi-family properties at market returns. However, the Company anticipates that income from its multi-family properties will increase over time as its development projects underway are placed in service. The Company continued to implement the Strategic Plan throughout 2019.

2019 Business Highlights

During 2019, the Company continued its further progress toward the strategic objectives set forth in the Strategic Plan. Specifically, the Company executed on the following key accomplishments:

Stockholder Say-on-Pay Advisory Vote

In 2019, we sought a stockholder say-on-pay advisory vote regarding executive compensation, and approximately 98.4% of the votes cast were in favor of our executive compensation. The Compensation Committee viewed this 98.4% stockholder approval as being strongly supportive of the actions undertaken by the Compensation Committee in 2017, 2018 and 2019. The Compensation Committee believes its compensation actions in 2019 aligned the Company’s executive compensation plans with stockholder expectations. We currently intend to continue to seek an annual stockholder say-on-pay advisory vote regarding executive compensation.

The Compensation Committee believes that the Company’s overall executive compensation program incorporates many compensation elements that are considered best practices, including:

In addition, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors have committed to adopt, promptly upon effectiveness of final SEC and NYSE rules under Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), a clawback policy for executive officers.

Realizable Pay

The majority of our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation opportunity is “at risk,” with annual cash incentives tied to financial and strategic performance goals, and vesting of seventy-five percent (75%) of annual long-term incentive awards subject to achievement of absolute and relative TSR hurdles. With respect to all of the long-term incentive awards, including the twenty-five percent (25%) of annual long-term incentive awards that are time-based, the ultimate value of any earned shares depends on the Company’s absolute TSR. Lastly, the special Class AO LTIP Unit award will not be earned unless challenging stock price hurdles are achieved for thirty consecutive trading days.

Our pay-for-performance philosophy can be illustrated by comparing total compensation (as disclosed in the “Summary Compensation Table” in the “Executive Compensation” section below) to “realizable” compensation, which after taking into account actual performance demonstrates alignment of pay and performance. “Realizable” compensation for 2019 included base salary, earned annual cash incentives for 2019 performance, and the value of equity granted in 2019 as of December 31, 2019, with the number of equity awards based on performance as of that date against goals for performance-based equity awards.

As discussed in more detail below, the Company met or exceeded each of the financial and strategic objectives for the 2019 annual cash incentive plan, which resulted in earned bonuses between target and maximum levels. However, our absolute and relative TSR as of December 31, 2019 were below threshold goals for the performance-based LTIPs granted in 2019 such that if the performance period for the 2019 grants had ended on December 31, 2019, none of the performance-based LTIPs would have vested. Although our absolute TSR was below the threshold required for the performance-based LTIPs to be earned, our absolute TSR (i.e., share price appreciation plus dividends, assuming reinvestment) was positive such that the value at December 31, 2019 of the time-based LTIPs granted in 2019 was greater than their grant-date fair value. In addition, our stock price was below the price-vesting hurdles for the special Class AO LTIPs such that none of these awards would have been earned at December 31, 2019.

Overall, as of December 31, 2019, “realizable” pay for our Chief Executive Officer was approximately thirty-nine percent (39%) of the value of total compensation disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table. The table below compares the values of each element of our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation for 2019 (as reported in the Summary Compensation Table) to the realizable values for each such element of compensation, as of December 31, 2019.

Chief Executive Officer

2019 Realizable Pay

Compensation Consultant

Role of the Compensation Consultant. In 2019, the Compensation Committee retained FW Cook as its independent compensation consultant (the “Compensation Consultant”) to assist with structuring the Company’s various compensation programs and determining appropriate levels of salary, annual cash incentive plan and other compensatory awards payable to the Company’s executive officers and key employees. In 2019, FW Cook assisted on all relevant matters, including assisting with respect to: (i) assessing the Company’s and management’s performance relative to the Peer Group REITs; (ii) market ranges for salaries, annual cash incentive and long-term incentive compensation opportunities; (iii) compensation and governance practices relative to ISS and Glass Lewis policy guidelines; and (iv) structuring annual and long-term incentive compensation plans for management.

Determination of Compensation Consultant’s Objectivity. The Compensation Committee recognizes that it is essential to receive objective advice from its outside compensation consultant. FW Cook was engaged by the Compensation Committee to act as an independent outside consultant to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee closely examines the safeguards and steps that FW Cook takes to ensure that its executive compensation consulting services are objective. The Compensation Committee takes into consideration that:

FW Cook performed only executive, board and other compensation-related services for the Compensation Committee, and did not perform, directly or indirectly through an affiliate, any other services for the Company in 2019. Based on a consideration of factors deemed relevant to the Compensation Committee regarding FW Cook, including without limitation the independence factors specified in Section 303A.05 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, including the nature of the services provided, the amount of the compensation consultant’s fees, its policies and procedures to prevent conflicts of interest, its business or personal relationships with our directors and executive officers, and its stock ownership in us, the Compensation Committee concluded that FW Cook is independent and that the work that they perform for the Compensation Committee has not raised any conflict of interest.

Process for Determining Compensation

For its competitive analysis to assist the Committee in developing pay opportunities for 2019, FW Cook used a peer group consisting of the following fourteen office and diversified REITs: Brandywine Realty Trust, Columbia Property Trust, Corporate Office Properties Trust, Inc., Cousins Properties, Douglas Emmett, Inc., Empire State Realty Trust, Equity Commonwealth, Gramercy Property Trust, Highwoods Properties, Inc., Hudson Pacific Properties, Lexington Realty Trust, Paramount Group, Inc., Piedmont Office Realty Trust, and Washington REIT (collectively, the “Peer Group REITs”). The Compensation Committee used this analysis to evaluate the competitiveness of base salary, target annual cash incentive plan award, equity awards and target total compensation opportunities for the named executive officers, including the assessment of individual components of compensation. The Compensation Committee did not target a specific percentile of the Peer Group REITs for any compensation determinations but used the compensation data from Peer Group REITs as a factor in determining the appropriateness of compensation amounts generally.

The Compensation Committee, with assistance from the Compensation Consultant, and based upon the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer with respect to the other named executive officers, determines the appropriate combination of cash and equity-based compensation to pay to the Company’s executives and establishes performance metrics for annual cash incentive plan awards in consideration of its primary objectives with respect to executive compensation. In determining the appropriate mix of such compensation and the appropriate amounts of any discretionary components, the Compensation Committee considers the Compensation Consultant’s competitive analyses of the Company’s overall compensation arrangements. The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for the strategic direction and long-term planning for the Company and oversees the day to day performance of the other named executive officers. As such, the Compensation Committee believes that the input of the Chief Executive Officer is necessary information for it to evaluate the performance of the other named executive officers and make recommendations for their compensation packages. While the Compensation Committee considers the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer with respect to his own compensation, the Chief Executive Officer does not participate in the Compensation Committee’s determination of his own compensation and the Compensation Committee’s determinations with respect to the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation are not based on such recommendations.

The performance of the Company’s named executive officers was evaluated as of the end of 2019 (in the first quarter of 2020, after all financial information relative to the 2019 performance metrics for the annual cash incentive plan awards had been determined based on the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019) by the Compensation Committee, with assistance from the Compensation Consultant, to determine performance relative to the 2019 performance metrics for the annual cash incentive plan awards.

Components of Compensation in 2019

For 2019, the Company’s core executive compensation program consisted of the following elements: (1) annual base salary; (2) annual cash incentive plan award; and (3) awards of performance-based and service-based LTIP Units of the Operating Partnership.

The allocation of each component of executive compensation was determined by the Compensation Committee, based upon its review of the Peer Group REIT data compiled by its Compensation Consultant and input from the Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to the authority vested in the Compensation Committee set forth in its charter, it has complete discretion with respect to the compensation of the named executive officers.

Base Salaries. Base salaries are the fixed component of total compensation, and are established at levels the Compensation Committee deems appropriate for the function each executive officer performs. Base salaries are reviewed annually and with assistance from the Compensation Consultant and may be adjusted upward by the Compensation Committee from time to time. The table below sets forth the base salaries for the named executive officers in 2018 and 2019:

The Compensation Committee determined that 2019 base salaries for each of the named executive officers would remain the same as their 2018 base salaries.

Annual Cash Incentive Plan Compensation. The Company’s policy of awarding annual cash incentive plan awards is designed to specifically relate executive pay to Company and individual performance and to provide financial rewards for the achievement of substantive Company objectives.

In March 2019, the Compensation Committee adopted and the Board of Directors approved an annual cash incentive plan for the named executive officers for 2019, which was designed to directly support the Company’s short-term goals in furtherance of the Strategic Plan.

For 2019, the Compensation Committee established annual cash incentive award opportunities for each named executive officer as a percentage of base salary, which awards were fixed by the terms of their respective employment agreements, as follows:

The determination of 2019 annual cash incentive plan awards for the named executive officers was based on the achievement of certain performance measures approved by the Compensation Committee and ratified and adopted by the Board of Directors were as follows:

(i) the completion of the sale of the Company’s Flex Portfolio at its net asset value (NAV) midpoint of $550 million or higher;

(ii) the repayment of certain unsecured debt borrowings from the proceeds of the Flex Portfolio sale;

(iii) the acquisition of Soho Lofts, a key Jersey City multi-family asset, and completion of a subsequent follow-on secured financing;

(iv) the elimination of certain joint venture interests and dispositions of other non-core properties; and

(v) the Company’s leasing activity, as determined by the Compensation Committee based on one or more objective criteria, including total new leasing of 500,000 square feet or more and total new leasing of Waterfront properties of 300,000 square feet or more.

Target Core FFO per share was set by the Compensation Committee at the midpoint of the Core FFO per share guidance published by the Company in February 2019. The Target Core FFO and Target Core Adjusted FFO for 2019 were lower than the Target Core FFO and Target Core Adjusted FFO goals for 2018 based on the reduction of the properties in the Company’s portfolio resulting from the disposition of sixty-four office properties, four multi-family rental properties and four developable land properties in 2019 for net sales proceeds of approximately $1.1 billion pursuant to the Strategic Plan. The deployment of proceeds from those dispositions to repay outstanding debt of the Company and investment in multi-family residential acquisitions and development were not expected to contribute to FFO in 2019. The non-financial strategic objectives for the Company’s 2019 annual cash incentive plan were approved by the Compensation Committee based on the Company’s 2019 strategic plan.

In March 2020, after the filing of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2019, the Compensation Committee assessed the performance of the named executive officers in 2019 relative to the above 2019 performance measures for the Company and made the following determination:

Accordingly, the total 2019 cash incentive plan payouts for each of the named executive officers under the cash incentive plan were as follows:

Long-Term Incentives. The Company utilizes long-term incentive compensation in the form of service-based and performance-based equity awards to focus executives on the long-term performance of the Company, retain key executives, to align their interests with those of our stockholders, and to promote the success and enhance the value of the Company. The Compensation Committee, together with the Compensation Consultant, designed the long-term incentives for the named executive officers to be strongly tied to objective, quantifiable long-term performance metrics in line with current trends and recognized corporate governance “best practices.”

2019 Long-Term Incentive Grants. In March 2019, the Compensation Committee adopted and the Board of Directors approved the grant of long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) awards to the management teams of the Company and Roseland, including all of the Company’s executive officers (the “2019 LTIP Awards”). The design of the program was similar to the design of the LTIP Awards granted to the management team of the Company in 2017 and 2018. All of the 2019 LTIP Awards were in the form of LTIP Units and were made under the stockholder approved Mack-Cali Realty Corporation 2013 Incentive Stock Plan (the “2013 Plan”).

As with the 2017 and 2018 equity awards, the Compensation Committee determined to award a portion of the 2019 LTIP Awards in the form of performance-based awards, pursuant to the 2019 Outperformance Plan adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors, consisting of a multi-year, performance-based equity compensation plan and related forms of award agreements (the “2019 OPP”), to better align executive and stockholder interests by tying executive performance to TSR. For Mr. DeMarco, approximately seventy-five percent (75%) of the target 2019 LTIP Awards were in the form of performance-based LTIP Units under the 2019 OPP (the “2019 PBV LTIP Units”), and the remaining approximately twenty-five percent (25%) of his 2019 LTIP Awards were in the form of time-based LTIP Units that will vest after three years on March 22, 2022 (the “2019 TBV LTIP Units”). For Messrs. Tycher, Smetana, Cardoso and Wagner, fifty percent (50%) of their respective 2019 LTIP Awards were in the form of 2019 PBV LTIP Units and the remaining fifty percent (50%) of their respective 2019 LTIP Awards were in the form of 2019 TBV LTIP Units.

The 2019 OPP was designed to align the interests of senior management to relative and absolute stock performance of the Company over a three-year performance period from March 22, 2019 through March 21, 2022. Participants in the 2019 OPP will only earn the full awards if, over the three-year performance period, the Company achieves a thirty-six percent (36%) absolute TSR and if the Company’s TSR is in the 75th percentile of performance as compared to the peer group of equity office REITs in the NAREIT index (the “TSR Peer Group”).

Under the 2019 OPP, executive officers who received 2019 PBV LTIP Awards have the opportunity to vest such awards in 2019 PBV LTIP Units, which ultimately may be settled in shares of Common Stock, according to the following schedule, with linear interpolation for performance between the specified levels:

The threshold, target and maximum TSR metrics were designed to promote value creation over a long-term period and reward management only after our stockholders receive a meaningful return. If the designated performance objectives are achieved, 2019 PBV LTIP Units are also subject to further time-based vesting requirements, with fifty percent (50%) of the 2019 PBV LTIP Units vesting at the end of the performance period on March 21, 2022, and the remaining fifty percent (50%) of the 2019 PBV LTIP Units vesting in two equal installments on March 21, 2023 and March 21, 2024.

The named executive officers of the Company received the following 2019 LTIP Awards in the amounts set forth in the table below.

LTIP Units were issued on March 22, 2019, but will remain subject to forfeiture depending on the extent that the 2019 LTIP Awards vest. The number of LTIP Units initially issued to recipients of the 2019 PBV LTIP Awards was the maximum number of LTIP Units that may be earned under the awards. The number of 2019 PBV LTIP Units that actually vest for each award recipient (subject to the time-based vesting requirements) will be determined at the end of the performance measurement period. TSR for the Company and for the TSR Peer Group over the three-year measurement period and other circumstances will determine how many 2019 PBV LTIP Units vest for each recipient (subject to the time-based vesting requirements); if they are fewer than the number issued initially, the balance will be forfeited as of the performance measurement date.

Prior to vesting, recipients of LTIP Units will be entitled to receive per unit distributions equal to one-tenth (10%) of the regular quarterly distributions payable on a Common Unit, but will not be entitled to receive any special distributions. Distributions with respect to the other nine-tenths (90%) of regular quarterly distributions payable on a Common Unit will accrue but shall only become payable upon vesting of the LTIP Unit. After vesting of the 2019 TBV LTIP Units or the end of the measurement period for the 2019 PBV LTIP Units, holders of LTIP Units, both vested and unvested pending satisfaction of the time-based vesting requirements, will be entitled to receive distributions in an amount per unit equal to distributions, both regular and special, payable on a Common Unit.

LTIP Units are designed to qualify as “profits interests” in the Operating Partnership for federal income tax purposes. As a general matter, the profits interest characteristics of the LTIP Units mean that initially they will not be economically equivalent in value to a Common Unit. If and when events specified by applicable tax regulations occur, LTIP Units can over time increase in value up to the point where they are equivalent to Common Units on a one-for-one basis. After LTIP Units are fully vested, and to the extent the special tax rules applicable to profits interests have allowed them to become equivalent in value to Common Units, LTIP Units may be converted on a one-for-one basis into Common Units. Common Units in turn have a one-for-one relationship in value with shares of Common Stock, and are redeemable on a one-for-one basis for cash or, at the election of the Company, shares of Common Stock.

On March 22, 2019, the Company in its capacity as sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, adopted the Eighth Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership, dated as of December 11, 1997 (as amended, the “Partnership Agreement”), to create new classes of LTIP Units under the Partnership Agreement in connection with the 2019 LTIP Awards.

Mr. DeMarco Class AO LTIP Units. On March 13, 2019, the Company entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. DeMarco (the “2019 DeMarco Employment Agreement”) pursuant to which Mr. DeMarco was issued 625,000 Class AO LTIP Units in the Operating Partnership. The Class AO LTIP Units were awarded to Mr. DeMarco to incentivize him to enter into the 2019 DeMarco Employment Agreement after the expiration of his previous employment agreement and to create incentives for Mr. DeMarco to drive stockholder value creation. The Board of Directors believes that retaining Mr. DeMarco’s continuing services as Chief Executive Officer has been critical to the successful completion of the Company’s ongoing strategic transformation, which Mr. DeMarco has led since he joined the Company in June 2015. As “appreciation only” LTIP Units, the Class AO LTIP Units are structured as the economic equivalent of stock options, such that Mr. DeMarco will only realize any value from the Class AO LTIP Units if the Company’s stock price appreciates at least 16.5% during the term of the 2019 DeMarco Employment Agreement for the initial tranche of Class AO LTIP Units to vest. These price vesting conditions (described below) must be achieved prior to March 13, 2023 for the Class AO LTIP Units to vest. Class AO LTIP Units are intended to qualify as “profits interests” for federal income tax purposes and generally allow the recipient to realize value only to the extent the Common Stock trades at a price per share that exceeds $21.46, the closing price of the Common Stock, as reported on the NYSE, on the date of grant, subject to any vesting conditions applicable to the award. The Class AO LTIP Units issued to Mr. DeMarco are subject to the following vesting conditions:

The value of vested Class AO LTIP Units, if any, is realized through conversion of the Class AO LTIP Units into Common Units. The number of Common Units into which vested Class AO LTIP Units may be converted is determined based on the quotient of (i) the excess of the closing price of the Common Stock, as reported on the NYSE, on the conversion date over $21.46, divided by (ii) the closing price of the Common Stock, as reported on the NYSE, on the conversion date. Vested Class AO LTIP Units may be converted into Common Units within ten years of the date of grant. For more information about the Class AO LTIP Units, see “Executive Compensation - Employment Contracts; Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control - Michael J. DeMarco Class AO LTIP Award Agreement.”

2017 Outperformance Plan (“2017 OPP”). On April 4, 2017, the Company granted LTIP awards to senior management of the Company, including the Company’s executive officers (the “2017 LTIP Awards”). All of the 2017 LTIP Awards were in the form of LTIP Units in the Operating Partnership and constitute awards under the 2013 Plan. For Messrs. DeMarco and Tycher, approximately twenty-five percent (25%) of the target 2017 LTIP Award was in the form of a time-based award that vested after three years on April 4, 2020 (the “2017 TBV LTIP Units”), and the remaining approximately seventy-five percent (75%) of the target 2017 LTIP Award was in the form of a performance-based award (the “2017 PBV LTIP Units”) under an Outperformance Plan adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors consisting of a multi-year, performance-based equity compensation plan and related forms of award agreement (the “2017 OPP”). For all other executive officers, approximately forty percent (40%) of the target 2017 LTIP Award was in the form of 2017 TBV LTIP Units and the remaining approximately sixty percent (60%) of the target 2017 LTIP Award was in the form of 2017 PBV LTIP Units. The 2017 TBV LTIP Units vested on April 4, 2020.

The 2017 OPP was designed to align the interests of senior management to relative and absolute stock performance of the Company over a three-year performance period from April 4, 2017 through April 3, 2020. Participants in the 2017 OPP would only earn the full awards if, over the three-year performance period, the Company had achieved a thirty-six percent (36%) absolute TSR and if the Company had been in the 75th percentile of performance versus the TSR Peer Group. As the performance targets for vesting were not achieved, the 2017 PBV LTIP Units did not vest and were forfeited.

Severance and Change-in-Control Payments. Each of our named executive officers for 2019 was subject to an employment agreement with the Company. These agreements provide for certain severance benefits in the event of termination of their employment in certain circumstances. These benefits are commonly offered among peer companies, and therefore enable us to attract and retain key talent. In particular, they ensure the retention of our named executive officers when considering potential transactions which may create uncertainty as to their continued employment. The employment agreements for each of the named executive officers that were in effect in 2019 provided for severance payments in the event of involuntary termination without cause or constructive termination for good reason and double trigger severance benefits in the event of a change in control that are generally one and one-half (1.5) or two (2.0) times the sum of annual base salary and bonus for the named executive officer. See “Executive Compensation—Employment Contracts; Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” for a summary of the terms and conditions of the severance provisions in the employment agreements of the named executive officers.

Benefits and Other Compensation

401(k) Savings Plan. The Company maintains a tax-qualified defined contribution plan (the “401(k) Plan”) for the benefit of all its eligible employees, including the named executive officers. The provisions and features of the plan apply to all participants in the plan, including the named executive officers. Eligible employees may elect to defer from one percent (1%) up to sixty percent (60%) of their annual compensation on a pre-tax basis to the 401(k) Plan, subject to certain limitations imposed by federal law. The amounts contributed by employees are immediately vested and non-forfeitable. The Company may make discretionary matching or profit sharing contributions to the 401(k) Plan on behalf of eligible participants in any plan year. Participants are always one-hundred percent (100%) vested in their pre-tax contributions and will begin vesting in any matching or profit sharing contributions made on their behalf after two years of service with the Company at a rate of twenty percent (20%) per year, becoming one-hundred percent (100%) vested after a total of six years of service with the Company. All contributions are allocated as a percentage of compensation of the eligible participants for the plan year. The assets of the 401(k) Plan are held in trust and a separate account is established for each participant. A participant may receive a distribution of his or her vested account balance in the 401(k) Plan in a single sum or in installment payments upon his or her termination of service with the Company. In 2019, there were $773,000 in discretionary matching or profit sharing contributions made by the Company to the plan on behalf of all employees, including $42,000 on behalf of the named executive officers.

Other Compensation. The Company offers limited perquisites to certain of its executive officers in the form of vehicle allowances. See note 3 under “Executive Compensation—Summary Compensation Table.” The Company does not offer qualified or non-qualified defined benefit plans to its executive officers or employees, nor does it offer non-qualified defined contribution plans.

Equity Ownership Guidelines

The Company has Equity Ownership Guidelines for the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee believes the Equity Ownership Guidelines further align the interests of the Chief Executive Officer with stockholder value and requires the executive to own an aggregate of 250,000 shares of the Common Stock (“Shares”) or any derivatives that may be settled in shares of the Common Stock (“Derivatives”), in any combination of Shares or Derivatives as determined in the sole discretion of the executive. The Chief Executive Officer currently satisfies these ownership guidelines.

Anti-Hedging/Anti-Pledging Policy

The Board of Directors has adopted a policy that provides that executive officers, employees, and directors may not acquire securities issued by the Company or any of its affiliates using borrowed funds, may not use margin in respect of securities issued by the Company or any of its affiliates, may not pledge securities issued by the Company or any of its affiliates as collateral, and may not engage in hedging or other transactions with respect to their ownership of securities issued by the Company or its affiliates, each of which the Board of Directors believes would be inconsistent with the purposes and intent of the stock ownership guidelines applicable to directors and the Chief Executive Officer.

Compensation Risk Assessment

In setting compensation, the Compensation Committee considers the risks to our stockholders and to achievement of our goals that may be inherent in our compensation programs. At the direction of the Compensation Committee, we conducted a risk assessment of our compensation programs, including our executive compensation programs. The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed the findings of this assessment and concluded that our compensation programs are designed with the appropriate balance of risk and reward in relation to our overall business strategy and do not incent employees to take unnecessary or excessive risks. Although a significant portion of our executive’s compensation is performance-based and “at-risk,” we believe our executive compensation plans are appropriately structured and are not reasonably likely to result in a material adverse effect on the Company. We considered the following elements of our executive compensation plans and policies when evaluating whether such plans and policies encourage our executives to take unreasonable risks:

In sum, we believe our executive compensation program is structured so that (i) we maintain a conservative risk profile that and aims to achieve strong stockholder returns and long-term results; (ii) we avoid the type of disproportionately large short-term incentives that could encourage executives to take risks that may not be in our long-term interests; (iii) we provide incentives to manage for long-term performance; and (iv) a considerable amount of wealth of our executives is tied to our long-term success. We believe this combination of factors encourages our executives to manage the Company in a prudent manner. The Compensation Committee specifically considered compensation risk implications during its deliberations on annual cash incentive plan awards and performance metrics for all executive officers.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and discussed that Analysis with management. Based on its review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 and the Company’s proxy statement relating to the Annual Meeting of stockholders to be held on June 10, 2020. This report is provided by the following independent directors, who comprise all of the members of the Compensation Committee:

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Compensation Committee consists of Lisa Myers, Chairman, Laura H. Pomerantz, Irvin D. Reid and Rebecca Robertson. No member of the Compensation Committee was at any time in 2019 or at any other time an officer or employee of the Company, and no member had any relationship with the Company requiring disclosure as a related-person transaction in the section “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.” No executive officer of the Company has served on the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has or has had one or more executive officers who served as a member of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee at any time in 2019.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the compensation of all persons who served as chief executive officer or chief financial officer during 2019, and the three most highly compensated executive officers of the Company other than those persons who served as chief executive officer or chief financial officer in 2019 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”) for the Company’s fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively:

Summary Compensation Table

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

On March 22, 2019, the Company granted the 2019 LTIP Awards to senior management of the Company, including the Company’s executive officers. All of the 2019 LTIP Awards were in the form of LTIP Units and constituted awards under the 2013 Plan. For Mr. DeMarco, approximately twenty-five percent (25%) of the target 2019 LTIP Awards were in the form of 2019 TBV LTIP Units, which will vest after three years on March 22, 2022, and the remaining approximately seventy-five percent (75%) of his 2019 LTIP Awards were in the form of 2019 PBV LTIP Units under the 2019 OPP. For Messrs. Tycher, Smetana, Cardoso and Wagner, fifty percent (50%) of their respective 2019 LTIP Awards were in the form of 2019 TBV LTIP Units and the remaining fifty percent (50%) of their respective 2019 LTIP Awards were in the form of 2019 PBV LTIP Units.

The 2019 OPP was designed to align the interests of senior management to relative and absolute stock performance of the Company over a three-year performance period from March 22, 2019 through March 21, 2022. Participants of performance-based awards in the 2019 OPP will only earn the full awards if, over the three-year performance period, the Company achieves a thirty-six percent (36%) absolute TSR and if the Company’s TSR is in the 75th percentile of performance as compared to the TSR Peer Group.

If the designated performance objectives are achieved, 2019 PBV LTIP Units are also subject to further time-based vesting requirements, with fifty percent (50%) of the 2019 PBV LTIP Units vesting at the end of the performance period on March 21, 2022, and the remaining fifty percent (50%) of the 2019 PBV LTIP Units vesting in two equal installments on March 21, 2023 and March 21, 2024.

LTIP Units will remain subject to forfeiture depending on the extent that the 2017 LTIP Awards, 2018 LTIP Awards and 2019 LTIP Awards vest. The number of LTIP Units initially issued to recipients of the 2017 PBV LTIP Awards, 2018 PBV LTIP Awards and 2019 PBV LTIP Awards was the maximum number of LTIP Units that may be earned under the applicable awards. The performance targets for vesting of the 2017 PBV LTIP Awards were not achieved as of April 3, 2020. As a result, none of the 2017 PBV LTIP Units subject to such award vested and all were forfeited by the employees and cancelled by the Company, including 349,177 2017 PBV LTIP Awards held by the Named Executive Officers. With respect to the 2018 PBV LTIP Awards and 2019 PBV LTIP Awards, the number of LTIP Units that actually vest for each award recipient (subject to the time-based vesting requirements of the applicable awards) will be determined at the end of the performance measurement period of the applicable awards. TSR for the Company and for the TSR Peer Group over the three-year measurement period of the applicable awards and other circumstances will determine how many LTIP Units vest for each recipient (subject to the time-based vesting requirements of the applicable awards); if they are fewer than the number issued initially, the balance will be forfeited as of the performance measurement date of the applicable awards.

Prior to vesting, recipients of LTIP Units will be entitled to receive per unit distributions equal to one-tenth (10%) of the regular quarterly distributions payable on a Common Unit, but will not be entitled to receive any special distributions. Distributions with respect to the other nine-tenths (90%) of regular quarterly distributions payable on a Common Unit will accrue but only become payable upon vesting of the LTIP Unit. After vesting of the 2017 TBV LTIP Units, 2018 TBV LTIP Units and 2019 TBV LTIP Units, or the end of the measurement period for the 2017 PBV LTIP Units, 2018 PBV LTIP Units and 2019 PBV LTIP Units, as applicable, the holders of such LTIP Units, both the vested and those that remain unvested (pending satisfaction of any time-based vesting requirements of the applicable awards), will be entitled to receive distributions in an amount per unit equal to distributions, both regular and special, payable on a Common Unit.

As a result of targets not being achieved or management and other personnel changes during the year ended December 31, 2019, all 2016 LTIP Awards subject to performance-based vesting were forfeited by employees and cancelled by the Company, including 249,876 2016 LTIP Awards held by the Named Executive Officers.

Outstanding Equity Awards At Fiscal Year-End

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

Pension Benefits

The Company does not offer qualified or non-qualified defined benefit plans to its executive officers or employees.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

The Company does not offer non-qualified defined contribution or other deferred compensation plans to its executive officers or employees.

Employment Contracts; Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The following discussion includes descriptions of the material terms of employment agreements and certain incentive equity award agreements between the Company and Messrs. DeMarco, Tycher, Smetana, Cardoso and Wagner.

Michael J. DeMarco Employment Agreement. On June 5, 2015, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. DeMarco (the “2015 DeMarco Employment Agreement”). The term of the 2015 DeMarco Employment Agreement expired on December 31, 2018. On March 13, 2019, the Company entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. DeMarco, effective as of January 1, 2019 (the “2019 DeMarco Employment Agreement”), that replaced the 2015 DeMarco Employment Agreement.

Pursuant to the 2019 DeMarco Employment Agreement, the Company has agreed to employ Mr. DeMarco, and Mr. DeMarco has agreed to be employed by the Company, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, for a period commencing on January 1, 2019 and ending on December 31, 2022 (the “Term”), unless Mr. DeMarco’s employment is earlier terminated in accordance with the 2019 DeMarco Employment Agreement.

Pursuant to the 2019 DeMarco Employment Agreement, Mr. DeMarco will be entitled to the following compensation and benefits:

In addition, Mr. DeMarco will be entitled to customary employee benefits under the Company’s health and welfare plans.

The 2019 DeMarco Employment Agreement provides for certain severance payments to Mr. DeMarco, or his beneficiaries, upon death, disability, termination by the Company without cause, and termination by Mr. DeMarco for good reason during the Term or a change in control period. Under the 2019 DeMarco Employment Agreement:

For purposes of the definition of “cause” under the 2019 DeMarco Employment Agreement, no act, or failure to act, on his part shall be considered “willful” unless done, or omitted to be done, by him (I) not in good faith and (II) without reasonable belief that his action or omission was in furtherance of the interests of the Company.

Under the terms of the 2019 DeMarco Employment Agreement, upon a termination on account of death or disability, Mr. DeMarco (or his beneficiaries in the case of death) will be entitled to receive his accrued and unpaid base salary, expense reimbursement and benefits under the Company’s health and welfare plans through the termination date, plus a prorated portion of the annual bonus payable for the year of such termination.

In the event of a termination of Mr. DeMarco’s employment without cause or by Mr. DeMarco for good reason during the Term or thereafter during a change in control period, subject to Mr. DeMarco signing a release in customary form, he will be entitled to the same benefits in the event of a termination due to death or disability, as described above, plus a lump sum cash payment equal to (i) if such termination occurs during the Term and not during a change in control period, two (2.0) times the sum of (x) his annual base salary immediately prior to the termination date and (y) his target bonus for the year during which termination occurs, or (ii) if such termination occurs during or after the expiration the Term and during a change in control period, three (3.0) times the sum of (x) his annual base salary immediately prior to the termination date and (y) his target bonus for the year during which termination occurs. In addition, Mr. DeMarco will be entitled to COBRA coverage premiums for up to eighteen months after such termination.

Under the terms of the 2019 DeMarco Employment Agreement, (i) the expiration of the Term will not be considered a termination of Mr. DeMarco’s employment by the Company with or without cause or the resignation of Mr. DeMarco for good reason or otherwise, and (ii) in the event a reorganization, spin-off, split-off or similar transaction (or series of transactions) involving the Company is consummated and, following the consummation of such transaction, Mr. DeMarco continues to be employed as chief executive officer of any successor entity (or the ultimate parent entity thereof) that expressly assumes the Company’s obligations under the 2019 DeMarco Employment Agreement, the consummation of such transaction (or series of transactions) will not be considered a termination of Mr. DeMarco’s employment by the Company with or without cause or the resignation of Mr. DeMarco for good reason or otherwise and, in each such case, Mr. DeMarco’s employment will not be considered to have been constructively terminated for any reason unless he resigns for good reason in accordance with the 2019 DeMarco Employment Agreement.

Pursuant to the 2019 DeMarco Employment Agreement, Mr. DeMarco will be subject to certain restrictive covenants, including non-competition and non-solicitation covenants during the period of his employment with the Company and for 12 months after termination of his employment in circumstances in which he is entitled to receive severance benefits under the 2019 DeMarco Employment Agreement.

Michael J. DeMarco Class AO LTIP Award Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the 2019 DeMarco Employment Agreement, the Company has entered into the Class AO LTIP Award Agreement with Mr. DeMarco, which provides for the grant to Mr. DeMarco of 625,000 Class AO LTIP Units pursuant to the 2013 Plan and the Partnership Agreement. The Class AO LTIP Units were awarded to Mr. DeMarco to incentivize him to enter into the 2019 DeMarco Employment Agreement after the expiration of the 2015 DeMarco Employment Agreement. The Board of Directors believes that retaining Mr. DeMarco’s continuing services as Chief Executive Officer is critical to the successful completion of the Company’s ongoing strategic transformation, which Mr. DeMarco has led since he joined the Company in June 2015. To further incentivize Mr. DeMarco’s performance under his new employment agreement, the Class AO LTIP Units are structured as the economic equivalent of stock options, such that Mr. DeMarco will only realize any value from the Class AO LTIP Units if the Company’s stock price appreciates at least 16.5% during the term of the 2019 DeMarco Employment Agreement before any of the price vesting conditions (described below) are met prior to March 13, 2023. Class AO LTIP Units are intended to qualify as “profits interests” for federal income tax purposes and generally allow the recipient to realize value only to the extent the Common Stock trades at a price per share that exceeds $21.46, the closing price of the Common Stock, as reported on the NYSE, on the date of grant, subject to any vesting conditions applicable to the award. Under the Class AO LTIP Award Agreement, the Class AO LTIP Units issued to Mr. DeMarco are subject to the following vesting conditions:

The value of vested Class AO LTIP Units is realized through conversion of the Class AO LTIP Units into Common Units. The number of Common Units into which vested Class AO LTIP Units may be converted is determined based on the quotient of (i) the excess of the closing price of the Common Stock, as reported on the NYSE, on the conversion date over $21.46, divided by (ii) the closing price of the Common Stock, as reported on the NYSE, on the conversion date. Vested Class AO LTIP Units may be converted into Common Units within ten years of the date of grant.

Under the Class AO LTIP Award Agreement, any Class AO LTIP Units held by Mr. DeMarco upon termination of his employment will be treated as follows:

Under the Class AO LTIP Award Agreement, upon the occurrence of a change in control prior to March 13, 2023, if Mr. DeMarco’s employment with the Company or any of its subsidiaries has not been terminated by the Company for cause prior to such change in control, then satisfaction of the vesting conditions described above will be ascertained on the date of such change in control based on the price per share of Common Stock (plus the value per share of Common Stock of any other consideration, as determined by the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee) received by the Company’s stockholders in connection with such change in control, and any previously unvested Class AO LTIP Units issued to Mr. DeMarco that do not become vested as of the date of such change in control as described above will automatically be forfeited, cancelled and become null and void, without payment of any consideration therefor, as of the date of such change in control.