Document/Exhibit Description Pages Size
1: 10KSB Form 10KSB for Year Ended December 31, 1999 44 205K
3: EX-10.10 Material Contract 25 75K
4: EX-10.11 Material Contract 30 87K
5: EX-10.12 Material Contract 13 44K
6: EX-10.13 Material Contract 12 54K
7: EX-10.15 Material Contract 6 25K
8: EX-10.16 Material Contract 6 25K
9: EX-10.17 Material Contract 5 24K
2: EX-10.9 Material Contract 57 152K
10: EX-23.1 Consent of Deloitte & Touche 1 7K
11: EX-23.2 Consent of Kpmg 1 6K
12: EX-27 Financial Data Schedule 1 7K
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FORM 10-KSB
[X] Annual report under Section 13 or 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.
[ ] Transition report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 for the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-19828
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SPATIALIGHT, INC.
(Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter)
New York 16-1363082
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
9 Commercial Blvd., Suite 200, Novato, California 94949
-------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)
(415) 883-1693
--------------
(Issuer's telephone number)
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:
None Securities registered under Section 12(g) of
the Act:
Common Stock $.01 par value
---------------------------
(Title of Class)
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:
Yes [X] No [ ]
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item
405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB
or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [ ]
Issuer's revenues for the year ended December 31, 1999 aggregated
$62,000.
The aggregate market value for the Issuer's voting stock held by
non-affiliates of the Issuer based upon the $7.5625 per share closing sale price
of the Common Stock on March 14, 2000 as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board, was
approximately $110,347,538. Shares of Common Stock held by each officer and
director and by each person who owns 5% or more of the outstanding common stock
have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This
determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination
for other purposes.
As of March 14, 2000, Registrant had 18,597,244 shares of Common Stock
outstanding.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):
Yes [ ] No [X]
SPATIALIGHT, INC.
FORM 10-KSB ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
[Download Table]
Page
----
PART I
ITEM 1 Description of Business.............................................3
ITEM 2 Description of Property.............................................7
ITEM 3 Legal Proceedings...................................................7
ITEM 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote
Of Security Holders.................................................7
PART II
ITEM 5 Market for Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters.................................................8
ITEM 6 Management's Discussion and Analysis
Or Plan of Operation................................................9
ITEM 7 Financial Statements...............................................20
ITEM 8 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants
On Accounting and Financial Disclosure.............................37
PART III
ITEM 9 Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control
Persons; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.........37
ITEM 10 Executive Compensation.............................................39
ITEM 11 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.....41
ITEM 12 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.....................42
ITEM 13 Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K...................................42
PART I
This annual report on Form 10-KSB contains certain forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is subject to the Safe Harbor provisions created by that statute.
In this report, the words "anticipates," "believes," "expects," "future",
"interests," and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Such
statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited
to, those discussed herein, and in particular, those contained in "Item 6 -
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" under the caption "Risk Factors," that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those projected. You are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date
hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the result of any
revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be needed to reflect
events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events.
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
INTRODUCTION
We develop and supply microdisplays that provide high resolution images
suitable for applications such as rear projection computer monitors, high
definition television and video projectors, and potential applications such as
use in wireless communication devices, portable games and digital assistants.
Our microdisplays are designed for use in end products of original equipment
manufacturers (OEMs) and therefore we work closely with prospective customers to
incorporate our microdisplays into their final products. Because our
microdisplays can be manufactured using existing silicon and liquid crystal
processes, we contract with existing manufacturers for the production of our
silicon and the assembly of the final display modules. We have patents covering
parts of our designs, however the key designs of the circuitry in the silicon,
drive electronics, and liquid crystal assembly techniques are proprietary.
Our microdisplays are high-resolution liquid crystal displays, and are
constructed with a silicon chip, a layer of liquid crystals and a glass cover
plate, in contrast to the more common construction of liquid crystals sandwiched
in between two glass plates. These displays are also known as and commonly
referred to as Liquid Crystal Displays (LCD), Active Matrix Liquid Crystal
Displays (AMLCD), Liquid Crystal on Silicon (LCOS), and Spatial Light Modulators
(SLM).
Our microdisplays measure approximately one inch in diagonal, contain
large arrays of pixels and therefore can provide more content at a lower cost
than currently available displays. The image on a microdisplay can be projected
onto a screen or other surface for individual or group viewing or used in a
portable application that is viewed through a magnifying device similar to a
viewfinder. Potential microdisplay applications include: large-screen
rear-projection television systems, in both standard television format (NTSC)
and High Definition Television (HDTV) formats; large-screen rear-projection
computer monitors in a variety of resolutions; video projectors for
presentations; head-mounted displays which are used for virtual reality systems,
defense, aerospace and gaming applications; and other potential applications
such as point of purchase displays, optical computing, data storage and
holographic imaging systems.
Our technology uses liquid crystals and silicon chips. An advantage of
these materials is that processes for working with them are already known, so we
can to move from prototypes to production more quickly than competing
technologies offering comparable quality. By using existing manufacturing
processes we believe we can rapidly obtain economies of scale and thereby reduce
costs.
We are a corporation organized under the laws of the State of New York,
incorporated in 1989. Our executive offices are located at 9 Commercial
Boulevard, Suite 200, Novato, California 94949. Our Web site is located at
www.spatialight.com.
3
TECHNOLOGY AND PRODUCTS UNDER DEVELOPMENT
As of December 31, 1999 we were working to ship prototype quantities of
our fifth generation display, a 1,280 x 1,024 array of pixels (a total of
1,310,720 pixels), for evaluation by our customers. Our previous technology was
a fourth generation 0.9-inch diagonal display, with a 1,024 x 768 array of
pixels (a total of 786,432 pixels). This product started shipping in the fourth
quarter of 1998 in the form of developer kits, which were designed to assist
potential customers in evaluating the display technology for inclusion in their
products. To date, we have only sold small quantities of our 1,024 x 768
developer kits. On March 23, 2000 we announced that we are shipping SpatiaLight
ImagEngine 1280BC microdisplays. These products are currently being shipped to
four customers.
The technology underlying our display products utilizes the well-known
and documented manipulation of liquid crystals. A typical liquid crystal
display, as might be found in a notebook computer, basically consists (along
with other associated materials and processes) of liquid crystal material
sandwiched between two pieces of glass, polarizers, color filters, a data signal
and a light source. As the data signal is applied across the sandwich of the
liquid crystals, the electric field created by this data signal cause the liquid
crystals to twist and untwist. This twisting, combined with the polarizers,
makes each pixel change from opaque to transparent, thereby controlling either
the transmission or reflection of light from each pixel.
Departing from typical liquid crystal displays utilizing circuitry on
two pieces of glass, we design integrated circuits, which control individual
reflective pixels on a silicon substrate. This silicon substrate is manufactured
using a standard complimentary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) process. This
processed silicon substrate, also known as a silicon backplane, then has the
liquid crystal material and a cover glass applied to it. When the data signal is
sent to the circuitry in the silicon, the liquid crystals again twist from
opaque to transparent states. When polarizers are added and light is reflected
from the pixels on the silicon, images can be viewed directly or, using standard
optical techniques, projected into larger images on a screen.
As is common with all LCDs, the images produced are inherently black and
white. The varying of the electrical signal to each pixel produces gray scaling
(various shades of gray going from black to white). Utilizing this gray scaling,
there are three basic techniques for achieving color displays: 1) optically
combining different colors of light, 2) sequential color systems and 3) color
filters. We believe our displays can be adapted for use in all of these types of
color display processes.
The display industry has and continues to undergo rapid and significant
technological change. We expect the display technology to continue to develop
rapidly, and our success will depend significantly on our ability to attain and
maintain a competitive position. Rapid technological development may result in
actual and proposed displays, products or processes becoming obsolete before we
recoup a significant portion of related research and development, acquisition
and commercialization costs.
After we mass-produce quantities of our display, our ability to compete
will depend in part upon many factors including the quality of the display,
delivery, pricing, and technical specifications. In addition there will be
factors within and outside of our control, including customer support and the
success and timing of product introduction and distribution by our customers.
Our competitors may succeed in developing technologies and products that are
equally or more efficient than any which are being developed by us which will
render our technology, displays and other products obsolete and non-competitive.
4
Although we have produced displays based upon our technology, we have
not yet had our display incorporated into any commercial end use application.
Delays in development may result in our introduction of our displays later than
anticipated, which may have a material adverse effect on both our financial and
competitive position. Moreover, we may never be successful in developing or
manufacturing a commercially viable display. In addition, our displays may not
be technically or commercially successful, we may not obtain suppliers or
manufacturers for adequate quantities of our displays, or we may not reach
commercially acceptable cost levels on a timely basis.
MARKETING, SALES AND DISTRIBUTION
Application and Markets
We are working with a number of international original equipment
manufacturers (OEM) to use our microdisplays in their end product applications.
Our ability to design end products for any of these markets, as well as the
ability to sell and distribute in these diverse markets is beyond the current
resources of our company. We are therefore establishing relationships with OEMs
to incorporate our displays into their products. In some instances, especially
high volume applications, we custom design our displays to fit a specific
manufacturer's need for a specific product. We will also consider licensing
large manufacturers who have the ability and desire to manufacture our displays
for use in their final products. Our displays can be incorporated into a wide
variety of products such as rear-projection televisions, rear-projection
computer monitors, video projectors, and head mounted displays.
Our strategy is to focus our abilities on original equipment design
(OED) of LCOS microdisplays, and to work closely with OEMs to market end
products utilizing our displays. We are therefore dependent upon these OEMs for
the manufacturing and marketing of end products. As of December 31, 1999, no end
products exist using our display, and there can be no assurance that any OEM
will develop or market a product incorporating our display.
We are forming alliances with corporate partners for the marketing and
distribution of products incorporating our microdisplays. We may not be
successful in forming and maintaining such alliances and our partners may not
devote adequate resources to successfully market and distribute these
anticipated products. We may not be able to enter into satisfactory agreements
and our marketing partners may not be successful in gaining market acceptance
for these anticipated products.
Manufacturing and Supply
We currently contract with manufacturers for the production of our
silicon and assembly of our displays, and are in discussions with additional
manufacturers as second sources for these functions. Our facility in Novato,
California contains a Class 1000 "clean room" which is designed principally for
research and development, prototype and pre-production assembly of our
microdisplays. We recognize the need for strict quality control of our
microdisplays manufactured in both our facility and our contract manufacturing
partners. We perform product testing, analyze the results and take actions to
refine the manufacturing process or enhance product design. We are developing
statistical quality control procedures for our contract manufacturers, in which
continual quantitative measurements of critical parameters are used as a
feedback mechanism to improve the manufacturing process.
We are working with two foundries for the production of our silicon,
United Microelectronics Corp. (UMC) in Taiwan, and Anam Semiconductor, Inc. in
Korea. The supply of silicon from these suppliers does fluctuate, and we may be
subject to problems of availability. We have also engaged the services of
Varitronix Limited in Hong Kong for the final assembly process of our displays.
5
Any termination of a manufacturing or supply contract could have a
material adverse effect on our ability to meet our anticipated commitments to
customers while we identify and qualify replacement manufacturers. We could
become dependent on any manufacturer and any termination or cancellation of our
agreement with the manufacturer could adversely affect our ability to
manufacture our products. In anticipation of such an event, we are establishing
secondary manufacturing and supply relationships.
COMPETITION
Microdisplays are a subset of the display market. This display market
subset consists of 1) reflective microdisplays produced on silicon backplanes,
2) transmissive microdisplays and 3) emissive microdisplays. The reflective
microdisplay competition includes companies such as Colorado MicroDisplay,
Displaytech, Hughes/JVC, IBM, inVisio, Microdisplay, Three-Five Systems, and
Varitronix. These companies are all producing different forms of a liquid
crystal display on a silicon backplane. Competitors in the reflective
microdisplay market, although not using liquid crystals in the display are Texas
Instruments which is producing a micro-mechanical structure of moving mirrors on
a silicon backplane, and Silicon Light Machines which is producing a deformable
grating on a silicon backplane.
Rapid and significant technological advances have characterized the
microdisplay market. There can be no assurance that our displays will be
representative of such advances or that we will have sufficient funds to invest
in new technologies or products or processes. Although we believe that our
displays have specifications and capabilities which equal or exceed that of
commercially available LCD and Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) based display products,
the manufacturers of these products may develop further improvements of their
existing technology that would eliminate or diminish our anticipated advantage.
In addition, numerous competitors have substantially greater financial,
technical, marketing, distribution and other resources than us. We may also face
an aggressive, well financed competitive response that may include
misappropriation of our intellectual property or predatory pricing.
PATENTS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Our ability to compete effectively with other companies will depend, in
part, on our ability to maintain the proprietary nature of our technologies. We
have been awarded five U.S. Patents and have other patent applications pending.
There can be no assurance as to the degree of protection offered by these
patents or as to the likelihood that pending patents will be issued. Our
competitors, in both the United States and foreign countries, many of which have
substantially greater resources and have made substantial investments in
competing technologies, may seek to apply for and obtain patents that will
prevent, limit or interfere with our ability to make and sell our products or
intentionally infringe our patents.
The defense and prosecution of patent suits is both costly and
time-consuming, even if the outcome is favorable to us. This is particularly
true in foreign countries. In addition, there is an inherent unpredictability
regarding obtaining and enforcing patents in foreign countries. An adverse
outcome in the defense of a patent suit could subject us to significant
liabilities to third parties, require disputed rights to be licensed from third
parties, or require us to cease selling our products.
We also rely on unpatented proprietary technology and there can be no
assurance that others may not independently develop the same or similar
technology or otherwise obtain access to our proprietary technology. To protect
our rights in these areas, we require all employees and technology consultants,
advisors and collaborators to enter into confidentiality agreements. However,
these agreements may not provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets,
know-how or other proprietary information in the event of any unauthorized use,
misappropriation or disclosure of such trade secrets, know-how or other
proprietary information. To date, we have no experience in enforcing our
confidentiality agreements.
6
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
We incurred research and development expenses of approximately $2
million in 1999 and $1.5 million in 1998. Research and development expenses are
those costs incurred for personnel and experimental materials for the design and
development of new products. We believe that the development of new products
will be required to allow us to compete effectively and to achieve future
revenues. We currently have 12 full-time employees whose duties include research
and development. We intend to continue our product development programs,
focusing on increasing the display specifications including resolution, color,
and manufacturing processes. We believe that such developments will be required
to exploit future markets.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 1999, the Company had 16 full-time and 1 part-time
employees. Full-time employment is divided among two functional areas with 12 in
research and development and 4 in finance and administration. Employees are not
represented by any collective bargaining organizations. We consider our
relations with our employees to be good.
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Our headquarters are located at 9 Commercial Boulevard, Suite 200,
Novato, California. SpatiaLight occupies approximately 10,000 square feet of
office space at this location bound by a two-year lease with two options for
additional one year extensions.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Tony Romano and Magellin Entertainment, Inc. (Plaintiffs) filed an
action against us in San Francisco Superior Court on January 10, 2000. Directors
Michael Burney and Robert Olins were also named. The complaint relates to an
alleged engagement of Plaintiffs by SpatiaLight in January 1998 to increase
public awareness of SpatiaLight, in return for our securities. The Complaint
seeks specific performance for the transfer of an additional 75,000 shares of
stock. SpatiaLight denies the allegations in the complaint. We do not believe we
have any liability to the Plaintiffs arising from the litigation. No reserves
have been established for potential losses from the litigation.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted by us to a vote of our security holders during
the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999.
7
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS
Trading in our common stock has been conducted on the over-the-counter
Bulletin Board since April 2, 1997. The common stock was previously listed on
the Nasdaq SmallCap Market trading under the symbol "SLHT" until April 1997. On
April 2, 1997 we were delisted from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market because we did
not meet certain requirements for continued listing. Because we are traded on
the over-the counter Bulletin Board, our securities may be less liquid, receive
less coverage by security analysts and news media, and generate lower prices
than might otherwise be obtained. In November 1997 we changed our stock symbol
to "HDTV". In December 1999 we filed an application with the Nasdaq to be
relisted on a Nasdaq market. Nasdaq is currently processing our application and
there can be no assurance that our application will be accepted.
The following tables sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated,
the range of high and low quotations for the common stock, as reported by
Commodity Systems, Inc.
HDTV Common Stock
[Download Table]
1999
High Low
------------ -------------
First Quarter 3.25 1.34
Second Quarter 5.65 2.00
Third Quarter 3.75 2.50
Fourth Quarter 6.19 2.47
[Download Table]
1998
High Low
------------ -------------
First Quarter 1.00 0.25
Second Quarter 1.09 0.33
Third Quarter 0.86 0.41
Fourth Quarter 1.94 0.44
The quotations listed above reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail
mark-up, markdown or commission and may not represent actual transactions.
As of March 14, 2000 there were approximately 481 holders of record of
the common shares of SpatiaLight and the price per share of our common stock was
$7.56. The common stock represents the only class of securities outstanding as
of this filing. Because many of such shares are held by brokers and institutions
on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of
stockholders represented by these record holders.
To date, we have not paid a dividend on our common stock. The payment of
future dividends is subject to our earnings and financial position and such
other factors, including contractual restrictions, as the Board of Directors may
deem relevant and it is unlikely that dividends will be paid in the foreseeable
future.
8
Over the past three years, we have issued promissory notes convertible
into common stock and warrants to purchase common stock in private placements to
raise capital for SpatiaLight. Three private placements to multiple investors
were in December 1997, November 1998 and December 1999. In the aggregate,
16,203,762 shares of common stock have been issued or are exercisable under
convertible notes or warrants to purchase common stock and subsequently
approximately 4,128,000 of these shares have been registered on Form S-3. Such
securities were issued on approximately 40 separate dates. As of March 14, 2000
SpatiaLight raised an aggregate of approximately $12,374,000 from these
issuances. In addition stock has been issued directly, in general in return for
legal or consulting services, on numerous occasions over the past three years.
ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report. This
discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks,
uncertainties and assumptions. The actual results could differ materially from
those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain
factors, including but not limited to, customer's reception of our products,
intensity of competition, quality control during manufacturing and those set
forth under "Risk Factors".
OVERVIEW
We design microdisplays that provide high resolution images suitable for
applications such as rear projection computer monitors, high definition
television and video projectors, and potential applications such as use in
wireless communication devices, portable games and digital assistants. Our
revenues through December 31, 1999 have been principally derived from the sales
of our fourth generation display developer kits, which begin shipping in the
fourth quarter of 1998. As potential customers evaluated our displays during
1999, we began development of our fifth generation display. This new display
incorporated the best specifications of our previous display, and new technical
capabilities that our potential customers wanted for incorporation in their
products. It was designed for mass production. Our fifth generation display
began shipping in the first quarter of 2000.
In January 2000 we began a conversion of our accounting system into a
fully integrated accounting and manufacturing software and hardware solution. We
initiated this change to efficiently handle the expected accounting and
manufacturing issues related with our change from our previous company focus,
which was solely research and development, to our new focus of manufacturing and
sales. This conversion will cost approximately $250,000 and we expect this
conversion to be completed in the second quarter of this year.
During 1999 our operations were constrained by an insufficient amount of
working capital and we experienced negative cash flows and net operating losses.
Our operations were funded in 1999 by the sale and exercise of warrants and by
convertible securities, which are secured by substantially all of our assets. In
the fourth quarter of 1999 management executed a plan to financially secure our
operations during 2000 with two courses of action.
The first course of action was implemented in November 1999 when we
filed two S-3 Registration Statements with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). These were declared effective on December 7, 1999. These
prospectuses relate to the offer and sale of up to 2,543,515 shares of our
common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants, with exercise prices ranging
from $0.50 to $2.8125 per share, issued to investors from June 19, 1997 to
September 15, 1999. As of March 14, 2000 we have received $3,988,512 from the
exercise of these warrants for which we have issued 1,813,515 shares of common
stock.
9
The second course of action was also implemented in November 1999. This
was the conversion of $2,612,500 of the then existing convertible securities
into common stock and the closing of a new convertible debt financing in
December in the amount of $2,875,000, of which we have received $1,437,500 as of
December 31, 1999.
As of March 14, 2000, we have received a total of $5,426,012 from these
warrants and convertible notes, and we expect to receive an additional
$1,437,500 during the second quarter of 2000 assuming a performance target is
achieved.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the net revenue
associated with items in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. The
table and the discussion below should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto.
[Download Table]
Years ending December 31,
1999 1998
----------- -----------
Revenues $ 62,000 29,750
Cost of revenues 10,945 4,104
----------- -----------
Gross profits 51,055 25,646
Selling, general and administrative expenses 2,084,273 1,189,330
Stock-based general and administrative expenses 1,935,504 371,617
Research and development expenses 1,955,170 1,509,510
----------- -----------
Total operating expenses 5,974,947 3,070,457
Operating loss (5,923,892) (3,044,811)
Total other expense (1,483,594) (136,129)
Loss from operations before income taxes (7,407,486) (3,180,940)
----------- -----------
Income taxes 3,375 2,734
----------- -----------
Net loss $(7,410,861) (3,183,674)
=========== ===========
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of December 31, 1999, the Company had $1,236,609 in cash and cash
equivalents, an increase of $766,523 over the December 31, 1998 amount of
$470,086. Our net working capital at December 31, 1999 was $319,331, as compared
to negative $3,381,358 at December 31, 1998. The increases in cash and working
capital were due to the conversion of short-term convertible notes in November
1999 and the completion of new long-term convertible notes in December 1999.
During 1999 we had negative cash flow from operations, resulting in the
need to fund ongoing operations from financing activities. Net cash used by
operating activities totaled $3,572,094 and $2,810,289 in 1999 and 1998,
respectively. Net cash that was provided by financing activities was $4,571,059
and $2,951,063 in 1999 and 1998 respectively, principally resulting from the
issuance of convertible notes, the sale of warrants, and the exercise of
warrants and options.
As of December 31, 1999, we had an accumulated deficit of $21,378,010.
We have realized significant losses in the past and expect that these losses
will slow as we start production and realize sales
10
from this production during 2000. It is likely that we will still have losses in
2000 as we begin production. While we generated limited revenues and no profits
from operations during 1999, we expect substantial sales during 2000. The
development and commercialization of our displays will require substantial
expenditures during 2000. Consequently, we may continue to operate at a loss for
some time during 2000 and there can be no assurance that our business will
operate on a profitable basis.
We anticipate that our existing cash balances together with funds from
sales will be sufficient to meet our presently projected cash and working
capital requirements (which relate primarily to research, development and
production) for the next 12 months.
COMPARISON OF THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND 1998
Revenues. Our total revenues were $62,000 and $29,750 in 1999 and 1998
respectively. Revenues in both 1999 and 1998 were the result of sales of our
fourth generation display developer kits. Revenue from the sales of developer
kits are not indicative of the revenue we expect to realize on sales of our
displays produced in quantity. Developer kits have a higher unit price than mass
produced displays as they are custom made and require additional parts which are
not required for displays sold in quantity.
Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues are the product costs associated with
the manufacture of display developer kits. Costs of revenues were $10,945 and
$4,104 in 1999 and 1998, respectively. Gross margins associated with the sales
of developer kits are higher and not indicative of the gross margins we expect
to realize on sales of our displays produced in quantity. Developer kits have a
higher unit cost than mass produced displays as they are custom made, require
additional parts and they require additional time and effort spent with the
customer.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and
administrative expenses were $2,084,273 and $1,189,330 in 1999 and 1998,
respectively. The increase of 75% from 1998 levels is primarily due to an
increase in legal, accounting, payroll and office expenses.
Stock-based general and administrative expenses. Stock-based general and
administrative expenses were $1,935,504 and $371,617 in 1999 and 1998,
respectively. The amounts incurred relate to the valuation of common stock,
stock options, and warrants issued in exchange for consulting services provided
to us. The amounts incurred in 1998 relate to salaries and consulting expenses
paid in stock, stock options and warrants. This stock-based expense incurred
during 1999 has enabled us to obtain the necessary capital resources to support
working capital and development needs in 2000.
Research and development expenses. Research and development expense
increased from $1,509,510 to $1,955,170 or 30%, from 1998 to 1999. This increase
was due primarily to the expenses associated with the development of our fifth
generation display including parts, materials, wafer processing and additional
consulting services.
Interest income. Interest income was $10,303 and $6,786 in 1999 and
1998, respectively. The 51.8% increase in interest income in 1999 was due to
higher average cash balances during 1999 than during 1998.
Interest expense. Interest expense was $104,312 and $142,915 in 1999 and
1998 respectively. This decrease of $38,603 resulted from the conversion of
interest expense associated with certain convertible notes to equity that was
re-classified as stock-based interest expense. In addition, capital lease
obligations are nearing their termination dates, resulting in lower interest
expense in 1999.
Stock-based interest expense. Stock-based interest of $509,834 relates
to a change in the conversion price from $0.75 to $0.70 in exchange for a waiver
of covenants for certain convertible noteholders. A stock-based expense of
$601,957 relates to the valuation of interest converted into equity based on
fair market value of the stock at the time of conversion. An additional
stock-based expense of
11
$277,794 relates to the assumption that the $24,156 of accrued interest expense
will be converted to equity based on the fair market value of the common stock
on December 31, 1999.
Loss from operations before income taxes. Losses from operations before
income taxes were $7,407,486 and $3,180,940 in 1999 and 1998, respectively. This
133% increase from 1998 to 1999 reflects the increased expenses associated with
the restructuring and reorganizing of the company since its change in management
in July of 1998 and the redirecting of the company from its previous research &
development focus to manufacturing and sales. Of the total increased loss from
operations of $4,226,546, a total of $3,325,089 of this increased loss was
stock-based interest and general expenses.
COMPARISON OF THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1997
Revenues. Our net revenues were $29,750 and $325,000 in 1998 and 1997
respectively. Revenues in 1998 were comprised of sales of a small number of
developer kits of our displays, while those in 1997 were revenues from a
non-recurring engineering contract.
Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues represented product costs associated
with the production of display developer kits. Costs of revenue were $4,104 and
$0 in 1998 and 1997, respectively. There were no product sales in 1997.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and
administrative costs were $1,437,714 and $1,794,852 in 1998 and 1997,
respectively. The decrease of 20% from 1997 levels was due primarily to
non-recurring legal fees in 1997.
Research and development expenses. Research and development costs
decreased $348,160, or 19%, from 1997 to 1998. The decrease was due primarily to
the acquisition of SpatiaLight of California, Inc. (SOC) in 1997.
Stock-based general and administrative expenses. Stock-based general and
administrative expenses incurred in 1998 relate to salaries and consulting
expenses paid in stock, stock options, and warrants. No such expenses were
incurred in 1997.
Interest income. Interest income was $6,786 and $18,821 in 1998 and
1997, respectively. The decrease in interest income in 1998 was principally due
to lack of investments during the year.
Interest expense. Interest expenses were $142,915 and $12,186 for 1998
and 1997, respectively. This increase was primarily due to convertible notes
issued during 1998.
Loss from operations before income taxes. Losses from operations were
$3,180,940 and $3,320,887 in 1998 and 1997, respectively.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and
reporting standards for derivative financial instruments and hedging activities
related to those instruments, as well as other hedging activities. Because we do
not currently hold any derivative instruments and do not engage in hedging
activities, we expect the adoption of SFAS No. 133 will not have a material
impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. We will
be required to adopt SFAS No. 133 in fiscal 2001 in accordance with SFAS No 137,
which delays the required implementation of SFAS No. 133 for one year.
12
RISK FACTORS
WE ARE SUBJECT TO LENGTHY DEVELOPMENT PERIODS AND PRODUCT ACCEPTANCE CYCLES.
Our business model requires us to develop microdisplays that perform
better than existing technologies, contract with one or more third-party
manufacturers to manufacture our prototypes in bulk, and sell the resulting
displays to original equipment manufacturers that will then incorporate it into
their products. OEMs make the determination during their product development
programs whether or not to incorporate our display modules in their products.
This requires us to invest significant amounts of time and capital in designing
display modules well before our customers introduce their products incorporating
these displays and before we can be sure that we will generate any significant
sales to our customers or even recover our investment. Even if a product is
successful for a short period, competition from other sellers could limit the
length of time it is successful.
WE ARE INCURRING SUBSTANTIAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS.
We currently have over ten engineers based in California working on
prototype microdisplays. This staffing creates significant research and
development costs that may not be recouped. We have sold our current prototypes
to a number of companies that have indicated they may be willing to incorporate
them into products if they could buy such displays in volume. As we begin the
process of working with third parties to manufacture our designs in volume, we
are continuing to use our engineers to develop subsequent generations of our
microdisplays. As a result, our overhead is expected to increase.
WE MAY EXPERIENCE DIFFICULTIES MASS-PRODUCING MICRODISPLAYS.
We need to work closely with our manufacturing sources to commence
volume production of our current prototype. Problems in implementing volume
production or lower than expected manufacturing yields could significantly and
adversely affect us because we will have already incurred the costs for the
materials used in the microdisplay manufacturing process. These problems could
cause delays that might lead our potential customers to seek other sources.
We currently obtain silicon backplanes from the Far East. Some Asian
countries are subject to earthquakes and typhoons. Unless we obtain a second
source, any disruption or termination of our silicon manufacturing operations in
Taiwan or air transportation with the Far East could adversely affect our
operations.
Our silicon backplanes are assembled in Hong Kong with electronic
components to create microdisplays. Because our assembly contract is relatively
new we anticipate that technical issues in the manufacturing process will need
to be resolved. The design and manufacture of LCDs and display modules are
highly complex processes that are sensitive to a wide variety of factors,
including the level of contaminants in the manufacturing environment, impurities
in the materials used, and the performance of personnel and equipment. Contract
manufacturers do not guarantee their manufacturing yields. In addition, the
complexity of manufacturing processes will increase along with increases in the
sophistication of our display modules. Low manufacturing yields or delivery
problems could adversely affect our operating results.
13
A MARKET FOR OUR PRODUCTS MAY NOT DEVELOP.
Various target markets for our micro-displays, including projectors,
monitors, high-definition televisions, and portable micro-displays, are
uncertain, may be slow to develop, or could utilize competing technologies.
High-definition television has only recently become available to consumers, and
widespread market acceptance is uncertain. In addition, the commercial success
of the portable microdisplay market is uncertain. Gaining acceptance in this
market may prove difficult because of the radically different approach of
microdisplays to the presentation of information. In order for us to succeed,
not only must we sell to those manufacturers that produce end-products
microdisplays that are better and cheaper than the alternatives they would
otherwise use, but also, the manufacturers themselves must develop products that
are successful commercially. Our failure to sell to manufacturers or the failure
of the ultimate target markets to develop as we expect will impede our
anticipated growth.
OUR DISPLAYS MAY NOT SUCCEED COMMERCIALLY.
Our microdisplays may not be accepted by a widespread market. Even if we
successfully mass-produce a display that is used in a retailed product, our
customers may determine not to introduce or may terminate products utilizing the
technology for a variety of reasons, including the following:
o superior technologies developed by our competitors;
o price considerations;
o lack of anticipated or actual market demand for the products; and
o difficulties in inducing companies to begin using our product.
WE DO NOT HAVE LONG-TERM PURCHASE COMMITMENTS FROM OUR PROSPECTIVE CUSTOMERS.
Our prospective customers have not yet provided us with firm or
long-term volume purchase commitments. Although we have begun to negotiate with
our customers, we currently do not have any contracts with our customers.
Because we have no firm, long-term volume purchase commitments we do not have
clear order lead times or basis for inventory allocations. In addition, our
prospective customers can cancel purchase commitments or reduce or delay orders
at any time. The cancellation, delay, or reduction of customer commitments could
result in our holding excess and obsolete inventory or having unabsorbed
manufacturing overhead. Our sales to customers in the electronics industry,
which is subject to severe competitive pressures, rapid technological change,
and product obsolescence, increases our inventory and overhead risks.
WE DEPEND ON THE MARKET ACCEPTANCE OF THE PRODUCTS OF OUR CUSTOMERS.
We do not sell any products to end-users. Instead, we design and
manufacture various product solutions that our customers incorporate into their
products. As a result, our success depends almost entirely upon the widespread
market acceptance of our customers' products. Any significant slowdown in the
demand for our customers' products would adversely affect our business.
Our dependence on the success of the products of our customers exposes
us to a variety of risks, including our needs to do the following:
o maintain customer satisfaction with our design and manufacturing
services;
o match our design and manufacturing capacity with customer demand and to
maintain satisfactory delivery schedules;
14
o anticipate customer order patterns, changes in order mix, and the level
and timing of orders that we can meet; and
o adjust to the cyclical nature of the industries and markets we serve.
Our failure to address these risks may cause us to lose sales or for sales to
decline.
WE FACE INTENSE COMPETITION.
We serve intensely competitive industries that are characterized by
price erosion, rapid technological change, and competition from major domestic
and international companies. This intense competition could result in pricing
pressures, lower sales, reduced margins, and lower market share. Some of our
competitors have greater market recognition, larger customer bases, and
substantially greater financial, technical, marketing, distribution and other
resources than we possess. As a result, they may be able to introduce new
products and respond to customer requirements more quickly than we can.
Our competitive position could suffer if one or more of our customers
decide to design and manufacture their own display modules, to contract with our
competitors, or to use alternative technologies. In addition, our customers
typically develop a second source. Second source suppliers may win an increasing
share of a program by competing primarily on price rather than on design.
Our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, both
within and outside our control. These factors include the following:
o our success in designing and manufacturing new display technologies;
o our ability to address the needs of customers;
o the quality, performance, reliability, features, ease of use, pricing,
and diversity of our display products;
o foreign currency fluctuations, which may cause a foreign competitor's
products to be priced significantly lower than our displays;
o the quality of our customer services;
o the efficiency of our production sources;
o the rate at which customers incorporate our displays into their own
products; and
o products or technologies introduced by our competitors.
THE ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY IS CYCLICAL.
The electronics industry has experienced significant economic downturns
at various times, characterized by diminished product demand, accelerated
erosion of average selling prices, and production over-capacity. In addition,
the electronics industry is cyclical in nature. We may experience substantial
period-to-period fluctuations in future operating results because of general
industry conditions or events occurring in the general economy.
15
WE MUST FINANCE THE GROWTH OF OUR BUSINESS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PRODUCTS.
To remain competitive, we must continue to make significant investments
in research and development, equipment and facilities. Our failure to generate
sales to offset our costs would adversely affect our ability to continue
operating.
We anticipate the need for additional equity or debt financing to
provide for the capital expenditures required to maintain our research and
development and to move to production. We cannot predict the timing or amount of
any such capital requirements at this time. If such financing is not available
on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to expand our business at the rate
desired and our operating results may suffer. Equity financing could result in
additional dilution to existing stockholders. Debt financing increases expenses,
must be repaid regardless of operating results, and is secured against our
assets, potentially leaving fewer resources available for the repayment of
equity holders.
OUR OPERATING RESULTS ARE NEGATIVE AND SUBJECT TO FLUCTUATIONS.
We have not achieved profits in the past five years and have experienced
cash shortages. We will need to achieve substantial sales to support our cost
structure before we can begin to recoup our operating losses and accumulated
deficit. Any progress toward profitability may not be steady and may be subject
to significant periodic or seasonal quarterly fluctuations due to factors
including the following:
o introductions of displays and market acceptance of new or new
generations of displays;
o timing of expenditures in anticipation of future orders;
o changes in our cost structure;
o availability of labor and components;
o pricing and availability of competitive products and services;
o the timing of orders;
o the volume of orders relative to the capacity we can contract to
produce;
o evolution in the life cycles of customers' products; and
o changes or anticipated changes in economic conditions.
THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK MAY BE VOLATILE.
The market price of our common stock has been extremely volatile,
reflecting reported losses, receipt of additional financing and changes to
management. Other companies have found similar volatility correlates with class
action securities law suits. The trading price of our common stock in the future
could continue to be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various
factors, including the following:
o quarterly variations in our operating results;
o actual or anticipated announcements of technical innovations or new
product developments by us or our competitors;
o public announcements regarding our business developments;
o changes in analysts' estimates of our financial performance;
16
o general conditions in the electronics industry; and
o worldwide economic and financial conditions.
In addition the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume
fluctuations that have particularly affected the market prices for many
high-technology companies and that often have been unrelated to the operating
performance of these companies. These broad market fluctuations and other
factors may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
OUR COMMON STOCK MAY NOT BE LIQUID.
We are currently traded on the over-the-counter bulletin board. Our
stockholders may find that it is more difficult to sell our capital stock than
shares listed on an exchange or a national market. The trading volume of our
shares may be limited in part due to the marketability of our stock. Any swing
in the price of our stock may be magnified into a material reduction in price
because relatively few buyers may be available to purchase our stock.
SALES OF LARGE NUMBERS OF SHARES COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PRICE OF OUR COMMON
STOCK.
Many of our outstanding shares are freely tradable without restrictions
or further registration. Sales of substantial amounts of common stock by our
stockholders, or even the potential for such sales, may affect the market price
of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through the
sale of our equity securities.
WE DEPEND ON KEY PERSONNEL.
Our development and operations depend substantially on the efforts and
abilities of our senior management and technical personnel. The competition for
qualified management and technical personnel is intense. The loss of services of
one or more of our key employees or the inability to add key personnel could
have a material adverse affect on us.
WE MUST PROTECT OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
We believe that our continued success depends in part on protecting our
proprietary technology. Third parties could claim that we are infringing their
patents or other intellectual property rights. In the event that a third party
alleges that we are infringing its rights, we may not be able to obtain licenses
on commercially reasonable terms from the third party, if at all, or the third
party may commence litigation against us. The failure to obtain necessary
licenses or other rights or the institution of litigation arising out of such
claims could materially and adversely affect us.
We rely on a combination of patent law, trade secret law, attempts to
limit disclosure of our confidential information and contractual provisions to
protect our intellectual property. Trade secret laws and contractual provisions
afford only limited protection. We face risks associated with our intellectual
property, including the following:
o pending patent applications may not be issued;
o patents issued to us may be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented;
o unauthorized parties may obtain and use information that we regard as
proprietary despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights;
17
o others may independently develop similar technology or design around
any patents issued to us;
o intellectual property laws may not protect our intellectual property;
and
o effective protection of intellectual property rights may be limited
or unavailable in some foreign countries, such as China, in which we
may operate.
WE FACE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND CURRENCY EXCHANGE.
Political and economic conditions abroad may adversely affect the
foreign manufacture and sale of our displays. Protectionist trade legislation in
either the United States or foreign countries, such as a change in the current
tariff structures, export or import compliance laws, or other trade policies,
could adversely affect our ability to manufacture or sell displays in foreign
markets and to purchase materials or equipment from foreign suppliers.
SHORTAGES OF COMPONENTS AND MATERIALS MAY DELAY OR REDUCE OUR SALES AND
INCREASE OUR COSTS.
Our inability to obtain sufficient quantities of components and other
materials necessary to produce our displays could result in reduced or delayed
sales or lost orders. Any delay in or loss of sales could adversely impact our
operating results. We obtain many of the materials we use in the manufacture of
our displays from a limited number of foreign suppliers, particularly suppliers
located in the Far East, and we do not have long-term supply contracts with any
of them. As a result, we are subject to economic instability and currency
fluctuations in these countries as well as to increased costs, supply
interruptions, and difficulties in obtaining materials. Our customers also may
encounter difficulties or increased costs in obtaining from others the materials
necessary to produce their products into which our product solutions are
incorporated.
WE MUST EFFECTIVELY MANAGE OUR GROWTH.
The failure to manage our growth effectively could adversely affect our
operations. Our ability to manage our planned growth effectively will require us
to:
o enhance our operational, financial, and management systems;
o expand our facilities and equipment; and
o successfully hire, train, and motivate additional employees, including
technical staff.
As we expand our overhead and selling expenses will increase. We also
may be required to increase staffing and purchase capital equipment. Customers,
however, generally do not commit to firm production schedules for more than a
short time in advance. Any increase in expenditures in anticipation of future
sales that do not materialize would adversely affect our profitability.
WE COULD BE LIABLE IN CONNECTION WITH PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIMS.
Product liability claims may be asserted against us in the event that
the use of our products, or products which incorporate our products, are alleged
to cause injury or other adverse effects. Our product liability insurance may
not be adequate to protect us against potential claims. As a result a successful
claim against us could materially affect our financial stability. In addition,
our reputation may be affected by product liability claims regardless of the
merit or eventual outcome of the claim.
18
WE DO NOT PAY CASH DIVIDENDS.
We have never paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not
anticipate that we will pay cash dividends in the near term. Instead, we intend
to apply earnings to the expansion and development of our business.
19
ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
SpatiaLight, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of SpatiaLight, Inc.
and Subsidiary (the Company) as of December 31, 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash
flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
represent fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position
of SpatiaLight, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 1999, and the results of
their operations and cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
San Francisco, California
March 25, 2000
20
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of SpatiaLight, Inc. and Subsidiary:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of SpatiaLight, Inc.
and subsidiary (the "Company") as of December 31, 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' capital deficiency, and
cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31,
1998, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then
ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 9 to the
consolidated financial statements, successful completion of the Company's
development program and ultimately, the attainment of profitable operations, is
dependent on future events including obtaining adequate financing, successful
launching of the commercial production and distribution of its products and
achieving a level of sales adequate to support the Company's cost structure. As
further discussed in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, the
Company's recurring losses from operations and stockholders' capital deficiency
raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
Management's plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 9. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ DELOITTE AND TOUCHE LLP
---------------------------
Deloitte and Touche LLP
San Francisco, California
March 24, 1999
21
SPATIALIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND 1998
[Enlarge/Download Table]
1999 1998
------------ ------------
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,236,609 470,086
Accounts receivable 0 30,492
Inventories 5,036 18,296
Other current assets 93,417 0
------------ ------------
Total current assets 1,335,062 518,874
Property and equipment, net 321,853 221,498
Other assets 22,670 187,204
------------ ------------
Total assets $ 1,679,585 927,576
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities
Accounts payable $ 286,741 466,031
Short term notes payable 0 3,337,508
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 728,990 96,693
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities 1,015,731 3,900,232
Noncurrent liabilities
Convertible notes 1,216,337 0
Long term capital lease obligations 9,605 25,420
------------ ------------
Total liabilities 2,241,673 3,925,652
Commitments and contigencies
Stockholders' equity (deficit):
Common stock, $.01 par value:
40,000,000 shares authorized;
16,635,818 and 11,413,501 shares issued and outstanding
in 1999 and 1998 respectively 166,359 114,135
Additional paid-in capital 20,649,563 10,854,938
Accumulated deficit (21,378,010) (13,967,149)
------------ ------------
Total stockholders' (deficit) (562,088) (2,998,076)
------------ ------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit) $ 1,679,585 927,576
============ ============
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
22
SPATIALIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 and 1998
[Enlarge/Download Table]
1999 1998
------------ ------------
Revenues $ 62,000 29,750
Cost of revenues 10,945 4,104
------------ ------------
Gross profits 51,055 25,646
Selling, general and administrative expenses 2,084,273 1,189,330
Stock-based general and administrative expenses 1,935,504 371,617
Research and development expenses 1,955,170 1,509,510
------------ ------------
Total operating expenses 5,974,947 3,070,457
Operating loss (5,923,892) (3,044,811)
Other income (expense):
Interest income 10,303 6,786
Interest expenses (104,312) (142,915)
Stock-based interest expense (1,389,585) 0
------------ ------------
Total other expense (1,483,594) (136,129)
------------ ------------
Loss from operations before income taxes (7,407,486) (3,180,940)
Income tax expense 3,375 2,734
------------ ------------
Net loss $ (7,410,861) (3,183,674)
============ ============
Net loss per share - basic and diluted $ (0.57) (0.34)
============ ============
Weighted average shares used in computing net loss per share - basic
and diluted 12,964,597 9,450,926
============ ============
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
23
SPATIALIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 and 1998
[Enlarge/Download Table]
ADDITIONAL TOTAL
COMMON STOCK PAID-IN ACCUMULATED STOCKHOLDERS'
SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL (DEFICIT) EQUITY (DEFICIT)
---------- ------- ---------- ---------- ---------------
Balance January 1, 1998 9,201,111 $92,011 $9,477,395 $(10,783,475) $(1,214,069)
Issuance of common stock, net 2,212,390 22,124 976,180 - 998,304
Issuance of warrants - - 231,035 - 231,035
Issuance of stock options - - 7,070 - 7,070
Common stock subscribed - - 163,258 - 163,258
Net loss - - - (3,183,674) (3,183,674)
---------- ------- ---------- ---------- ---------
Balance December 31, 1998 11,413,501 114,135 10,854,938 (13,967,149) (2,998,076)
Issuance of common stock 223,287 2,233 106,668 - 108,901
Sale of warrants - - 2,013,046 - 2,013,046
Net loss - - - (7,410,861) (7,410,861)
Conversion of convertible notes 3,674,991 36,750 2,575,750 - 2,612,500
Conversion of interest on convertible
notes 247,626 2,477 1,173,736 - 1,176,213
Issuance of warrants-convertible notes - - 1,437,500 - 1,437,500
Issuance of warrants-consulting services - - 1,077,036 - 1,077,036
Issuance of Class A, B and C warrants- - - 861,736 - 861,736
consulting services
Exercise of stock options and warrants 1,076,413 10,764 549,153 - 559,917
---------- ------- ---------- ---------- ---------
Balance December 31, 1999 16,635,818 166,359 20,649,563 (21,378,010) (562,088)
========== ======= ========== ========== =========
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
24
SPATIALIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND 1998
[Enlarge/Download Table]
1999 1998
----------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss $ (7,410,861) (3,183,674)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 296,465 82,798
Stock-based general and administrative expense 1,935,504 371,617
Stock-based interest expense 1,389,585 0
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 30,492 (30,492)
Inventories 13,260 (18,296)
Other current assets (93,417) 7,253
Accounts payable (179,290) (203,516)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 446,168 164,021
----------- ----------
Net cash used by operating activities (3,572,094) (2,810,289)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment (232,442) (86,312)
----------- ----------
Net cash used in investing activities (232,442) (86,312)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on capital lease obligations (30,281) (28,060)
Payments on line of credit 0 (250,000)
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes with warrants attached 1,437,500 0
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes 590,876 3,229,123
Proceeds from sales of warrants 2,013,046 0
Proceeds from exercise of warrants and options 559,918 0
----------- ----------
Net cash provided by financing activities 4,571,059 2,951,063
Net increase in cash 766,523 54,462
Cash at beginning of period 470,086 415,624
----------- ----------
Cash at end of period $ 1,236,609 470,086
=========== ==========
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Income taxes paid during the period $ 1,600 1,600
Interest paid during the period $ 7,579 50,150
Non cash financing activities:
Warrants issued in conjunction with convertible notes and loan
extensions 0 153,447
Common stock issued upon conversion of notes $ 2,612,500 662,667
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
25
SPATIALIGHT INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 1999 AND 1998
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Description of Business - SpatiaLight, Inc. (SpatiaLight or the Company)
and its subsidiary SpatiaLight of California, Inc. (SOC) are in the business of
designing high-resolution microdisplays, which measure one inch in diagonal and
basically consist of liquid crystals and a glass cover on top of a silicon chip.
These displays are also known as and commonly referred to as Liquid Crystal
Displays (LCD), Active Matrix Liquid Crystal Displays (AMLCD), Liquid Crystal on
Silicon (LCOS), and Spatial Light Modulators (SLM). These displays are designed
in a manner that can provide high-resolution images suitable for applications
such as computer monitors, high definition television, video projectors and
other applications while utilizing the existing manufacturing processes of
typical silicon and liquid crystal displays to obtain economies of scale and
thereby reduce costs. To date, the Company has only sold sample quantities of
its displays to customers who are evaluating the displays for use in their
products.
The address and telephone number of the Company's principal executive
offices are 9 Commercial Boulevard, Suite 200, Novato, California 94949, (415)
883-1693. The Company was organized under the laws of the State of New York in
1989 under the name of Sayett Acquisition Company, Inc.; it subsequently changed
is name to Sayett Group and in June 1996 changed its name to SpatiaLight, Inc.
The Company has a wholly owned subsidiary named SpatiaLight of California, Inc.
Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of SpatiaLight, Inc. (SI), and its wholly owned subsidiary
SpatiaLight of California, Inc. (SOC). All inter-company accounts and
transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.
Estimates - The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires that
management make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Cash Equivalents - Cash equivalents include money market securities
stated at cost, which approximate market value.
Inventories - Inventories in 1999 and 1998 are stated at the lower of
cost or market and consist primarily of developer kits and their components.
Property and Equipment - Property and equipment are recorded at cost
while repairs and maintenance costs are expensed in the period incurred.
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment is calculated on a
straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally 3
years for computer equipment and building improvements and 7 years for office
furniture and equipment.
Revenue Recognition - Revenue is generally recognized at the time that
product is shipped provided that collectability is probable.
Income Taxes - The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of
accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized
for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
26
SPATIALIGHT INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 1999 AND 1998 (Continued)
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which
those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation
allowance is recorded to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount whose
realization is more likely than not. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that
includes the enactment date.
Research and Development - Research and development costs are charged to
expense when incurred.
Financial Instruments - The Company's financial instruments include cash
and cash equivalents and debt. At December 31, 1999 and 1998 the fair values of
cash and cash equivalents and debt issued without equity components,
approximated their financial statement carrying amounts. For debt issued with
equity instruments attached, little or no value has been assigned to the debt
and the fair value of the debt on a stand-alone basis is not easily
determinable.
Stock-based Compensation - The Company accounts for its stock-based
compensation arrangements using the intrinsic value method pursuant to APB
Opinion No. 25. As such, compensation expense is recorded when, on the date of
grant, the fair value of the underlying common stock exceeds the exercise price
for stock options or the purchase price for issuances or sales of common stock.
Pursuant to SFAS No. 123, the Company discloses the proforma effects of using
the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation arrangements.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets and Long-lived Assets to be Disposed of
- The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets or
intangibles may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used
is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future
undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such
assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is
measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the
fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of
the carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.
Loss per Common Share - Basic loss per common share excludes dilution
and is computed by dividing loss attributable to common stockholders by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted
loss per common share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted
into common stock. Common share equivalents are excluded from the computation in
loss periods, as their effect would be antidilutive.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards -In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," which
defines derivatives, requires that all derivatives be carried at fair value, and
provides for hedge accounting when certain conditions are met. SFAS No. 133 is
effective for the Company in fiscal 2000. Although the Company has not fully
assessed the implications of SFAS No. 133, the Company does not believe that
adoption of this statement will have a material impact on the Company's
financial position or results of operation.
Reclassifications. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified
in order to conform to current years presentation.
27
SPATIALIGHT INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 1999 AND 1998 (Continued)
2. ISSUANCE OF SECURITIES
In December 1999, the Company issued warrants to purchase 821,429 shares
of common stock in conjunction with the issuance of $2,875,000 of convertible
notes. These convertible notes bear an interest rate of 6%, are convertible into
common stock at $3.50 per share, and are due on June 30, 2001. As of December
31, 1999 the Company received the first installment of $1,437,500. The second
installment of $1,437,500 will be received upon achievement of a performance
target. No conversions have taken place as of December 31, 1999.
The warrants attached to these notes were all issued in December 1999.
They are exercisable at any time by the lenders until June 30, 2002 at an
exercise price of $3.50 per share. No warrants have been exercised as of
December 31, 1999. A value of $1,437,500 was assigned to the warrants using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following assumptions; stock price
$6.00, exercise price $3.50, contractual term 2.5 years, volatility 114%,
risk-free interest rate 6% and a dividend yield of 0. The total cash received
from the issuance of the notes of $1,437,500 under this model is less than the
value associated with the warrants. Therefore, a value of $1,437,500 has been
assigned to the warrants and as a discount on the notes. This amount is being
recognized as interest expense over the term of the note at an annual rate of
approximately 1,230%. Interest expense related to this discount was
insignificant in 1999, and is expected to be $3,615 in 2000 and $1,433,885 in
2001, unless the debt is converted into equity at an earlier date.
During 1999 the Company sold warrants to purchase 2,315,283 shares of
the Company's common stock and received cash of $2,013,046. The purchase price
of the warrants ranged from $.67 to $1.07 with exercise prices ranging from
$1.87 to $2.81. If all the warrants are exercised, the aggregate proceeds will
be approximately $4,377,000.
During 1999, the Company issued warrants to purchase 693,000 shares of
common stock in exchange for services rendered to the Company. These warrants
have exercise prices ranging from $0.83 to $3.50. A value of $1,077,036 was
assigned to the warrants, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the
following assumptions: volatility 114%, risk free interest rate 6.0%, a dividend
yield of 0, contractual terms of 1.25 to 3.0 years and the stock price on the
dates of each issuance. This expense was recorded as stock-based general and
administrative expense.
Also during 1999, the Company issued 1,076,413 shares of common stock
upon the exercise of its stock options and warrants. A total of 268,700 employee
stock options, which vested during 1997 and 1998, were exercised at grant prices
ranging from $0.25 to $0.81. In addition, 779,000 warrants were exercised at
prices ranging from $0.50 to $0.83. These warrants were issued in 1997 and 1998.
Total cash received from the exercise of these options and warrants was $165,457
and $394,460, respectively. In addition, two warrants totaling 28,713 shares,
issued during 1997 and 1998 were exercised under a "cashless" provision of the
warrant.
In addition, in 1999, 39,973 shares of common stock were issued to
satisfy $108,901 of payables to employees and vendors.
During each of the first three-quarters of 1999 and the last quarter of
1998, the Company issued tranches of 100,000 Class A, 100,000 Class B and
100,000 Class C warrants to a consultant with exercises prices of $1.50, $2.00,
and $2.50, respectively. The Class A warrant is immediately exercisable and
allows the holder to purchase shares of the Company's common stock at an
exercise price of $1.50 per share. Upon exercise of the Class A warrant, a Class
B warrant will be issued by the Company to purchase shares of the Company's
common stock at an exercise price of $2.00 per share. The Class B warrant will
be exercisable from the date the Class A warrant is exercised until 2001. Upon
exercise of the Class B warrant, a Class C
28
SPATIALIGHT INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 1999 AND 1998 (Continued)
warrant will be issued by the Company to purchase shares of the Company's common
stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share. The Class C warrant will be
exercisable from the date the Class B warrant is exercised until 2002. The
warrants issued to the consultant are fully vested, and were issued in tranches
of 100,000 Class A, 100,000 Class B and 100,000 Class C in exchange for services
rendered during the quarters for advising the Company as to feasible capital
structures and assisting in identifying appropriate capital sources. An
independent valuation firm has determined the fair values of the Class A, Class
B and Class C warrants issued in 1999 on each of the issue dates and the Company
has recorded the total fair value of $861,736 as consulting expense. In the year
ended December 31, 1998, $60,584 was recorded as consulting expense
In 1998 the Company issued 120,000 Class A, 120,000 Class B, and 120,000
Class C warrants to a consultant with exercise prices of $1.50, $2.00, and
$2.50, respectively. The Class A warrant is immediately exercisable and allows
the holder to purchase shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price
of $1.50 per share. Upon exercise of the Class A warrant, a Class B warrant will
be issued by the Company to purchase shares of the Company's common stock at an
exercise price of $2.00 per share. The Class B warrant will be exercisable from
the date the Class A warrant is exercised until 2001. Upon exercise of the Class
B warrant a Class C warrant will be issued by the Company to purchase shares of
the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share. The Class C
warrant will be exercisable from the date the Class B warrant is exercised until
2002. The warrants issued to the consultant are fully vested, and were issued in
exchange for services rendered during 1998 for advising the Company as to
feasible capital structures and assisting in identifying appropriate capital
sources. A value of $66,217 was assigned to the warrants, using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following assumptions: stock price
$0.75, historical volatility 140%, risk free interest rate 5.32%, a dividend
yield of 0, and contractual terms of 1.25 to 3.0 years. This expense was
recorded as a cost of obtaining financing.
In 1998 the Company issued 364,700 shares of common stock to satisfy
approximately $220,000 of payables to vendors for expenses incurred in 1997.
In 1998 the Company also issued a warrant to purchase 20,000 shares of
common stock with an exercise price of $1.50 per share in exchange for legal
services. The warrants expire in the year 2000. A value of $6,932 was assigned
to the warrants, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following
assumptions: stock price $0.75, historical volatility 170%, risk free interest
rate 4.26%, a dividend yield of 0, and a contractual term of one year.
In December 1998 the Company issued warrants to purchase 76,000 shares
of common stock with exercise prices ranging from $.50 to $0.67 in exchange for
note extensions. A value of $93,246 was assigned to the warrants, using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following assumptions: stock price
$1.72, volatility 174%, risk free interest rate 4.52%, a dividend yield of 0,
and a contractual term of one year. In addition, in January 1998 the Company
issued a warrant to purchase 8,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price
of $.832 in exchange for a note extension. A value of $4,057 was assigned to the
warrants, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following
assumptions: stock price $.8125, volatility 176%, risk free interest rate 5.51%,
a dividend yield of 0, and a contractual term of one year. These warrants were
amortized to cost of financing over the one-year expected life of the warrants.
In 1998 the Company issued 86,000 shares of common stock as compensation
to an employee. The issuance was recorded as $21,500 of salary expense. Also,
45,000 shares of common stock were issued to vendors for consulting expenses at
a value of $22,825.
29
SPATIALIGHT INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 1999 AND 1998 (Continued)
3. NOTES PAYABLE
Short-term convertible notes totaling $3,281,952 were issued during
1998. The notes accrued interest at 6% and had a maturity date of December 31,
1999. The notes were convertible into the Company's common stock at $0.50 and
$0.70 per share. Of the total convertible notes, $2,012,500 of the notes
originally were convertible into the Company's common stock at $0.75 per share.
In September 1999 the Company agreed to reduce the conversion price of these
notes from $0.75 to $0.70 resulting in stock-based interest expense of $509,834
The reduction in conversion price was done in exchange for a waiver of certain
covenants of these convertible notes. The notes were secured by substantially
all of the assets of the Company. In February 1999, the Company issued
additional notes of $590,876 to the existing short-term note holders under the
same terms and conditions in exchange for cash. In November 1999, the note
holders converted these notes and the 1998 notes totaling $2,021,624 plus
accrued interest into 3,922,617 shares of common stock. Total principal and
interest converted was $2,612,500 and $1,176,213, respectively.
Convertible notes at December 31, 1999 relate to a note from Argyle
Capital Management Corporation, a company affiliated with Robert Olins, a
Director of the Company. The outstanding principal as of December 31, 1999 is
$1,188,000. These convertible notes accrue interest at 6% and both principal and
interest are convertible at $0.50 per share and are secured by substantially all
assets of the Company. These notes were originally due on December 31, 1999 and
have been extended until June 30, 2001 under the same terms. In September 1999,
upon a demand from Argyle Capital Management Corporation, the accumulated
interest was converted into 240,886 shares of the Company's common stock. The
Company valued this stock based upon a market price of $2.70 on the date of the
conversion and issuance, and has recorded a stock-based interest expense of
$601,957 in 1999 and $48,443 of interest expense in 1998. In addition, the
Company has assumed that the accrued interest expense at a rate of 6%, from
September 1999 to December 31, 1999 will be converted into 48,312 shares of
common stock. Using the December 31, 1999 closing price for the Company's common
stock of $5.75 to value such shares, the Company has recorded a stock-based
interest expense of $277,794 and accrued this on the balance sheet.
In 1998 convertible notes totaling $550,000 were converted into
1,716,610 shares of common stock. Conversion costs of $183,816 related to the
discounted conversion rate were recorded in costs of obtaining financing.
A short-term note of $55,000 was issued during 1998. The borrowing was
made to provide working capital, and accrued interest at 10% per annum. The note
was due on February 27, 1998 and was extended indefinitely in exchange for 8,000
warrants to purchase the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $0.83
per share. The warrants expire in 2000. The note was paid in the first quarter
of 1999.
4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment as of December 31, consists of the following:
[Download Table]
1999 1998
--------- --------
Office furniture and fixtures $ 165,319 97,119
Machinery and equipment 464,627 360,719
Building and improvements 60,334 0
--------- --------
690,280 457,838
Less accumulated depreciation 368,427 236,340
$ 321,853 221,498
========= ========
30
SPATIALIGHT INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 1999 AND 1998 (Continued)
Included in fixed assets at December 31, 1999 and 1998 is equipment
acquired under capital leases of $133,640 and $133,640 respectively with
accumulated depreciation of $92,364 and $65,682, respectively. The Company
incurred depreciation expense of $132,087 and $82,798 at December 31, 1999 and
1998, respectively.
The following is a summary of the future lease obligations as of
December 31, 1999:
[Download Table]
Year ended December 31: Capital Operating
------- ---------
2000 $18,485 $212,620
2001 6,431 209,258
2002 4,824 61,481
------- --------
Total minimum lease payments $29,740 $483,359
------- --------
Less amount representing interest 4,320
-------
Present value of net minimum capital lease payments 25,420
Less current installments under capital leases 15,815
-------
Obligations under capital leases, excluding current
installments $ 9,605
=======
Rent expense related to operating leases for the years ended December
31, 1999 and 1998 was $202,465 and $91,587, respectively.
5. INCOME TAXES
Income taxes for the year ended December 31, are comprised of the following:
[Download Table]
Current Deferred Total
-------- -------- -----
Year ended December 31, 1999
Federal $ 0 0 0
State 3,375 0 3,375
-------- ------- ------
Total 3,375 0 3,375
======== ======= ======
Year ended December 31, 1998
Federal 0 0 0
State 2,734 0 2,734
-------- ------- ------
Total $ 2,734 0 2,734
======== ======= ======
31
SPATIALIGHT INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 1999 AND 1998 (Continued)
Income tax expense (benefit) differed from the amounts computed by applying the
U.S. federal income tax rate of 34% to pretax losses from operations as a result
of the following:
[Download Table]
1999 1998
------------ ----------
Computed "expected" tax expense (benefit) $(2,599,108) (1,081,520)
Permanent differences (533,736) 63,862
Losses for which no benefit has been recognized 3,132,844 1,017,658
State tax expense, net of federal income tax benefit 3,375 2,734
----------- ---------
Total tax expense (benefit) $ 3,375 2,734
=========== =========
The tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions
of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31 is
presented below:
[Download Table]
1999 1998
-------------- ----------
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards $ 7,469,178 3,996,850
Equity investment losses 99,865 537,764
Accrued expenses 27,952 119,503
Research and development credits 486,762 338,790
Other 45,311 222,139
-------------- ----------
Gross deferred tax assets 8,129,068 5,215,046
Valuation allowance (8,129,068) (5,215,046)
-------------- ----------
Net deferred tax assets 0 0
-------------- ----------
Deferred tax liabilities
Gross deferred tax liabilities 0 0
-------------- ----------
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) $ 0 0
============== ==========
The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of December 31,1999
was $8,129,068. The net change in the total valuation allowance was $2,914,022
and $1,420,878 for the years ending December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. As
of December 31, 1999, the Company had net-operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $19,200,000 for federal and $13,300,000 for state tax purposes,
respectively, which begin to expire in 2005 for federal and have already begun
to expire for state. In addition, as of December 31, 1999, the Company had
research and development carryforwards of approximately $331,000 for federal,
which will begin to expire in 2008 and $239,000 for state tax purposes, which
will carryforward indefinitely.
Under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, should substantial
changes in the Company's ownership occur, the utilization of net operating loss
carryforwards may be limited.
Deferred tax assets resulting from net operating losses attributable to
stock option exercises and warrant issuances will result in a $611,000 credit to
additional paid-in capital when realized.
32
SPATIALIGHT INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 1999 AND 1998 (CONTINUED)
6. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Stock Option Plans - The Company has four Stock Option Plans (the Plans)
primarily for employees, consultants and directors. The Plans authorize the
issuance of options to purchase up to 4,000,000 shares of the Company's common
stock. The Plans provide for options which may be issued as nonqualified or
qualified incentive stock options under Section 422A of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended.
Under the 1991 and 1993 Employee Stock Option Plans, the Company may
grant options to purchase up to 1,915,000 shares of common stock to employees at
prices not less than 85% of fair market value for non-statutory stock options.
These options expire 10 years from the date of grant and become vested and
exercisable 50% in year one and 50% in year two.
Under the 1993 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan non-employee
directors of the Company are granted options to purchase 25,000 shares of common
stock at the fair market value at the date of grant. These options expire 10
years from the date of grant and become vested and exercisable 50% in year one
and 50% in year two. The total number of shares authorized under the Plan is
85,000.
At the last shareholders' meeting on June 21, 1999, the shareholders
approved a new stock option plan, the 1999 Stock Option Plan. Under the 1999
Stock Option Plan, the Company may grant options to employees, consultants and
directors of the Company to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of the Company's
common stock as either non-statutory stock options or incentive stock options.
These options expire 10 years from the date of grant and become vested and
exercisable 50% in year one and 50% in year two.
Options under the Plans are granted at the discretion of the Board of
Directors/Compensation Committee. All options granted through 1999 have been
granted at fair market value.
The following is a status of the options under the Plans and a summary
of the changes in options outstanding during 1999 and 1998:
[Download Table]
Number of Weighted Average
Shares Price
------------ ----------------
Outstanding January 1, 1998 1,355,000 $ 0.80
Options granted 1,620,000 $ 0.60
Options canceled (1,320,000) $ 0.67
--------- --------
Outstanding, December 31, 1998 1,655,000 $ 0.70
Options granted 1,487,500 $ 5.36
Options exercised (268,700) $ 0.62
Options canceled 0 -
--------- --------
Outstanding, December 31, 1999 2,873,800 $ 2.71
========= =======
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, (SFAS No. 123) requires the disclosure of pro forma net loss and
loss per share had the Company adopted the fair value method as of the beginning
of fiscal 1995. Under SFAS No. 123, the fair value of stock-based awards to
employees is calculated through the use of option pricing models, even though
such models were developed to estimate the fair value of freely tradable, fully
transferable options without vesting restrictions, which significantly differ
from the Company's stock option awards. These models also require subjective
assumptions, including future stock price volatility and expected time to
exercise, which greatly affect the calculated values.
33
SPATIALIGHT INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 1999 AND 1998 (Continued)
The Company's calculations were made using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: expected
life 24 months in 1999 and 36 months in 1998, historical volatility 114% in 1999
and 112% in 1998, and risk-free interest rates of 5.875% in 1999, 5.18% in 1998.
No dividends are expected for the term of the options. The Company's
calculations are based on a multiple option valuation approach and forfeitures
are recognized as they occur. If the computed fair values of the 1999 and 1998
awards had been amortized to expense over the vesting period of the awards,
proforma net loss would have been as follows:
[Enlarge/Download Table]
Years ended December 31,
1999 1998
----------- ----------
Net loss, as reported $(7,410,861) (3,183,674)
Pro forma net loss $(7,831,425) (3,325,463)
Net loss per share - basic and diluted (0.57) $(0.34)
Pro forma net loss per share - basic and diluted (0.60) (0.35)
Options exercisable as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 totaled
approximately 1,056,300 and 267,500 options at a weighted average exercise price
of $0.66 and $1.35 respectively.
Additional information regarding options outstanding as of December 31,
1999 is as follows:
[Download Table]
OPTIONS
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING EXERCISABLE
------------------- -----------
Weighted
Remaining Average Weighted Weighted
Range of Outstanding Contractual Average Average
Exercise at December Life Exercise Number Exercise
Prices 31, 1999 (Yrs.) Price Exercisable Price
----------- --------------- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------
$5.01-6.00 1,127,500 10.0 $5.75 0 $0.00
$3.01-4.00 25,000 9.5 $3.81 12,500 $3.81
$2.01-3.00 10,000 3.7 $3.00 10,000 $3.00
$0.25-1.00 1,711,300 8.4 $0.67 1,033,800 $0.66
--------- ---------
2,873,800 1,056,300
========= =========
At December 31, 1999, 1,126,200 shares were available for future grants
under the Plans.
34
SPATIALIGHT INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 1999 AND 1998 (Continued)
Diluted net loss per share does not include the effect of the following
potential common shares at December 31:
[Download Table]
1999 1998
---- ----
Shares issuable under stock options 2,873,800 1,655,000
Shares issuable pursuant to warrants to purchase common stock 6,724,712 2,827,000
Shares of convertible notes on an "as if converted" basis 2,876,714 6,051,000
The weighted average exercise price of stock options outstanding was
$2.71 and $.70 as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The weighted
average exercise price of warrants was $2.22 and $.87 as of December 31, 1999
and 1998, respectively.
7. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company's chief operating decision-maker is the Chief Executive
Officer. The chief operating decision-maker reviews only financial information
prepared on a basis substantially consistent with the accompanying financial
statements of operations. Therefore, the Company has determined that it operates
in a single business segment. The Company's revenue for 1999 and 1998 consisted
of sales of developer kits. All assets are located in the United States.
8. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Tony Romano and Magellin Entertainment, Inc. (Plaintiffs) filed an
action against the Company in San Francisco Superior Court on January 10, 2000.
Directors Michael Burney and Robert Olins were also named. The complaint relates
to an alleged engagement of Plaintiffs by SpatiaLight in January 1998 to
increase public awareness of SpatiaLight, in return for the Company's
securities. The Complaint seeks specific performance for the transfer of an
additional 75,000 shares of stock. The Company denies the allegations in the
complaint. The Company does not believe it has any liability to the Plaintiffs
from the litigation. No reserves have been established for potential losses from
the litigation.
9. 1998 GOING CONCERN UNCERTAINTY
During 1998, the Company's operations were constrained by an
insufficient amount of working capital and the Company continued to experience
negative cash flows and net operating losses. Successful completion of the
Company's development program and ultimately, the attainment profitable
operations, is dependent on future events including obtaining adequate
financing, successful launching of the commercial production and distribution of
its products and achieving a level of sales adequate to support the Company's
cost structure. Operations were funded by loans and convertible notes, which
were secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company. Recurring
operating losses and the accumulated deficit raised substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern, as of December 31, 1998.
Management addressed these concerns by raising additional capital.
The Company anticipates that its existing cash balances together with
funds from sales will be sufficient to meet its presently projected cash and
working capital requirements (which relate primarily to research, development
and production) for the next 12 months.
10. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
During the first quarter of 2000, 1,899,015 of the warrants outstanding
at December 31, 1999 were exercised. Cash received from the exercise of the
warrants totaled $4,178,792.
35
ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None
PART III
ITEM 9. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
[Download Table]
NAME AGE POSITION(S)
---- --- -----------
Michael H. Burney 47 Director, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer,
Secretary
Fred R. Hammett 58 President
Lawrence J. Matteson 60 Director
Robert A. Olins 43 Director
Miles L. Scott 49 Vice President Manufacturing/Engineering
Steven F. Tripp 31 Director
All Directors serve for terms of one year and until their successors are
duly elected. All of our officers have employment contracts for a one-year
period which are extendable for subsequent one year periods.
36
MICHAEL H. BURNEY, Director since June 1996, and Chief Executive
Officer, Treasurer and Secretary since July 1998, is also the Founder, Chairman
and CEO of Chronomotion Imaging, a private R & D company developing a patented
process for producing Volumetric Visualizations using electronic holography
since 1995. Mr. Burney was the Vice President Treasury for Packard Bell
Electronics from 1990 to 1995 and he was a member of the General Management
Consulting / Financial Services Group of Ernst & Young from 1987 to 1990. Mr.
Burney has received 3 U.S. patents and 15 international patents on the
electronic holography process, which is the basis of Chronomotion's intellectual
property. Mr. Burney received his BA from Pomona College and his MBA from
University of Southern California.
FRED R. HAMMETT, President since July 1998, was previously with
ExperTeam during 1997 and 1998, which is an organization providing professional
business resources to companies in growth or change phases. From 1996 to 1997
Mr. Hammett was President and Chief Operating Officer for Infinitron Research
International, Inc. From 1994 to 1996 Mr. Hammett was Vice President, Sales and
Marketing for UniCAD, Inc., and before that Regional Manager for Quad Design, a
Viewlogic Company. In addition to his 18 years in marketing, sales and
management positions at Hewlett Packard, he has worked with two successful
turnarounds and four successful startups. Mr. Hammett attended the Electronic
and Communications School of the US Air Force and studied economics and math at
the University of New Mexico.
LAWRENCE J. MATTESON, Director since 1991, served as Chairman of the
Board from May 1995 to June 1997. He currently is an executive professor of
business policy at the William E. Simon Graduate School of Business
Administration, University of Rochester. Mr. Matteson was Senior Vice President
and General Manager, Electronic Imaging for Kodak until December 1991. Mr.
Matteson began his career with Kodak in 1965 as a research engineer and has
worked at Kodak in various positions continuously from that date until December
1991. He holds degrees in engineering and an MBA from the University of
Rochester Graduate School of Business.
ROBERT A. OLINS, Director since February 1998. Mr. Olins has served as
President of Argyle Capital Management Corporation during the past fifteen
years. Argyle Capital Management Corporation is a private investment advisory
company.
MILES L. SCOTT, Vice President Manufacturing/Engineering since
October 1998, has been the Vice President of Operations and Director of
Development at New Interconnection and Packaging Technologies (NIPT) from 1997
to 1998. Mr. Scott was also Program Manager and Senior Process Engineer with
Silicon Mountain Design, where he developed, fabricated and commercialized
silicon based CCD cameras and displays from 1995 to 1997. Before that position,
Mr. Scott was the Principal Engineer and Business Development Leader for
Teledyne Brown Engineering from 1991 to 1995. Mr. Scott was also a Founder and
Chief Engineer for Optical Transformations, and worked at the MIT Lincoln Labs
as part of his 19 years with the U.S. Air Force. Mr. Scott has productized
high-speed CCD cameras, Liquid Crystal Displays (LCD), and analog micro-lens
arrays through Micro-machining techniques. Mr. Scott received his BS in
Electrical Engineering from the University of Utah.
STEVEN F. TRIPP, Director since June 1999, is President and CEO of
KnoWare, Inc. since 1998. KnoWare is a privately held software development
company focused on Internet based check image and check fraud detection software
for financial institutions. Mr. Tripp was Owner and Vice President of Document
Solutions from 1990 to 1998. Mr. Tripp has worked in the software development
industry for 10 years with a primary focus on digital imaging.
37
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE.
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
requires directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own more
than 10% of our Common Stock to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership
and reports of changes in ownership of Common Stock and other equity securities.
Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by
SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they
file. To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports
furnished to us for fiscal 1999, all executive officers, directors and greater
than 10% shareholders filed the required Section 16(a) reports in a timely
manner except that Michael H. Burney, Fred R. Hammett, Lawrence J. Matteson and
Miles L. Scott filed Forms 3 for the first time in 1999, despite being subject
to reporting requirements in previous years and Michael H. Burney, Fred R.
Hammett and Steven Tripp each filed one Form 4 one month late.
ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the compensation paid by the Company for
the fiscal year ended December 1999 to the Company's Chief Executive Officer and
other executive officers of the Company who received total salary and bonuses in
excess of $100,000 during 1999.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
[Download Table]
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY OPTIONS/SARS(#)
--------------------------- ---- ------ ---------------
Michael H. Burney, CEO, Treasurer, Secretary 1999 $200,000 500,000(1)
515,000
1998 $63,654
Fred R. Hammett, President 1999 $197,115 250,000(1)
1998 55,000 250,000
Miles L. Scott, Vice President, Engineering/ 1999 $100,000 125,000(1)
Manufacturing 1998 16,346 125,000
OPTION/SAR GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
[Download Table]
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)
NUMBER OF % OF TOTAL
SECURITIES OPTIONS/SARS
UNDERLYING GRANTED TO
OPTIONS/SARS EMPLOYEES IN EXERCISE OR EXPIRATION
NAME GRANTED (#) FISCAL YEAR BASE PRICE ($/SH) DATE
------------------ ------------- ------------- ----------------- -----------
Michael H. Burney 500,000(1) 40.4% $5.75 12/31/09
Fred R. Hammett 250,000(1) 20.2% $5.75 12/31/09
Miles L. Scott 125,000(1) 10.1% $5.75 12/31/09
(1) Standard options granted under the Company's stock option plans vest over a
two-year period, 50% each year. These stock option grants vest over a three-year
period and are subject to the optionee meeting specific performance targets.
38
OPTION EXERCISES AND FISCAL YEAR-END VALUES
The following table sets forth information with respect to options to
purchase common stock granted to the Company's named executive officers
including: (i) the number of shares of common stock purchased upon exercise of
options in the fiscal year ending December 31, 1999; (ii) the net value realized
upon such exercise; (iii) the number of unexercised options outstanding at
December 31, 1999; and (iv) the value of such unexercised options at December
31, 1999.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND
DECEMBER 31, 1999 OPTION VALUES
[Download Table]
(iv)
Value of
(iii) Unexercised
(i) Number of In-the-Money
Shares Unexercised options at
Acquired (ii) Options at Dec. Dec. 31, 1999
on Value 31, 1999(#) ($)
Exercise Realized Exercisable/ Exercisable/
Name (#) ($) Unexercisable Unexercisable
---- ------- -------- ------------- -------------
Michael H. Burney 17,500 $86,469 257,500/750,000 $1,291,250/$1,250,000
Fred R. Hammett 95,000 182,093 30,000/375,000 $150,000/$625,000
Miles L. Scott 0 0 62,500/187,500 $312,500/$312,500
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
Non-management directors are paid $500.00 for each board meeting
attended. Directors who are also full-time employees are not paid Directors'
fees. Robert Olins has waived his non-management Director's fee of $500.00 per
board meeting. In December 1998, Larry Matteson received a grant of 250,000
options with an exercise price of $0.75 under the Company's Stock Option Plans
for service as a director of the Company.
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS
We are party to an employment agreement with Michael H. Burney to serve
as Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Secretary, which is in effect through
December 31, 2000, with optional one year extensions. As currently in effect,
the agreement provides for a salary of $220,000, a signing bonus of $15,000, and
a grant of Incentive Stock Options to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock
vesting over a three year period depending upon the achievement of performance
criteria, and the reimbursement of moving expenses.
We are also party to an employment agreement with Fred R. Hammett to
serve as President, which is in effect through December 31, 2000, with optional
one year extensions. As currently in effect, the agreement provides for a salary
of $210,000, a signing bonus of $15,000, and a grant of Incentive Stock Options
to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock vesting over a three year period
depending upon the achievement of performance criteria, and the reimbursement of
moving expenses.
We are also party to an employment agreement with Miles L. Scott to
serve as Vice President Engineering/ Manufacturing, which is in effect through
December 31, 2000, with optional one-year extensions. As currently in effect,
the agreement provides for a salary of $175,000 and a grant of Incentive Stock
Options to purchase 125,000 shares of common stock vesting over a three year
period depending upon the achievement of performance criteria, and the
reimbursement of moving expenses.
39
ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
beneficial ownership of the Company's capital stock, as of December 31, 1999
based upon a total of 16,635,818 shares outstanding, (i) by each person who is
known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of the Company's capital
stock, (ii) by each of the executive officers mentioned in the tables under
"Executive Compensation" and by each of the Company's directors, and (iii) by
all officers and directors as a group.
[Download Table]
NAME AND ADDRESS AMOUNT AND NATURE OF PERCENT OF
BENEFICIAL OWNER BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP CLASS (1)
---------------- -------------------- ----------
Argyle Capital Management Corporation... 2,436,812(1) 12.78
Robert A. Olins
14 East 82nd
New York, New York 10028
Sabotini, Ltd........................... 2,060,000(2) 11.02
C/O Wychwood Trust Ltd.
1 Castle St.
Castletown
Isle of Man, British Isles
Raymond L. Bauch........................ 1,696,350 9.25
14 Office Drive Park, Suite 1
Palm Coast, FL 32137
Jalcanto, Ltd. ......................... 1,267,500(3) 7.08
C/O Wychwood Trust Ltd.
1 Castle St.
Castletown
Isle of Man, British Isles
Michael H. Burney....................... 289,127(4) 1.71
9 Commercial Blvd., Suite 200
Novato, CA 94949
Fred R. Hammett......................... 30,000(5) *
9 Commercial Blvd., Suite 200
Novato, CA 94949
Miles L. Scott.......................... 62,500(6) *
9 Commercial Blvd., Suite 200
Novato, CA 94949
Lawrence J. Matteson.................... 142,500(7) *
9 Commercial Blvd., Suite 200
Novato, CA 94949
Steven F. Tripp......................... 142,857 *
9 Commercial Blvd., Suite 200
Novato, CA 94949
All directors and officers as a group 666,984 3.85
(6 persons)
* Represents less than 1%
40
(1) Includes 2,424,312 shares beneficially owned subject to conversion of
principal and interest of convertible notes held by Argyle Capital
Management Corporation, of which Mr. Olins is President and over which Mr.
Olins exercises voting control. Also includes 12,500 shares subject to
outstanding stock options held by Mr. Olins that are exercisable within 60
days of December 31, 1999.
(2) Based solely upon information filed in a Schedule 13D by the named
shareholder. To the Company's knowledge, Shaun F. Cairns and Paul A. Bell
are the sole directors of the named shareholder. As such, Mr. Cairns and/or
Mr. Bell may be deemed to be the beneficial owner(s) of the shares of the
Company's Common Stock held by the named shareholder. Includes 992,500
shares subject to warrants exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 1999.
(3) Based solely upon information filed in a Schedule 13D by the named
shareholder. To the Company's knowledge, Shaun F. Cairns and Paul A. Bell
are the sole directors of the named shareholder. As such, Mr. Cairns and/or
Mr. Bell may be deemed to be the beneficial owner(s) of the shares of the
Company's Common Stock held by the named shareholder. Includes 200,000
shares subject to warrants exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 1999.
(4) Includes 257,500 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of
December 31, 1999.
(5) Includes 30,000 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of
December 31, 1999.
(6) Includes 62,500 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of
December 31, 1999.
(7) Includes 142,500 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of
December 31, 1999.
ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
In various transactions in 1998 Argyle Capital Management Corporation, a
company affiliated with Robert Olins, a Director of the Company, purchased
convertible notes of the Company in the outstanding principal amount of
$1,188,000. These convertible notes accrue interest at 6% and are convertible at
$0.50 per share. These notes were originally due on December 31, 1999 and have
been extended until June 30, 2001 on the same terms.
ITEM 13. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
[Download Table]
EXHIBIT # DESCRIPTION
--------- -----------
3.1* Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
3.2* Bylaws
10.1* 1991 Employee Stock Option Plan and Form of Stock Option Agreement
thereunder
10.2* 1993 Nonstatutory Employee Stock Option Plan and Form of Stock
Option Agreement thereunder
10.3* 1993 Nonstatutory Directors Stock Option Plan
10.4* 1999 Stock Option Plan
10.5* Form of Convertible Secured Loan Agreement, dated as
of November 1998, between SpatiaLight, and the
eighteen lenders listed on Exhibit A to such form
10.6* Form of Security Agreement, dated as of November 1998, between
SpatiaLight and the eighteen lenders listed on Exhibit A to such form
10.7* Form of Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of November
1998, among SpatiaLight, Argyle Capital Management
Corporation, Jerry Whitlock, Mansour Rasnavad, Network
Finance Incorporated, Farhad Azima and the eighteen
lenders listed on Exhibit A to such form
10.8* Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of
November 1998, between SpatiaLight and the eighteen
lenders listed on Exhibit A to such form
41
[Download Table]
EXHIBIT # DESCRIPTION
--------- -----------
10.9 Form of Convertible Secured Loan Agreement, dated as
of December 1, 1999, between SpatiaLight, and the
twenty-two lenders listed on Exhibit A to such form
10.10 Form of Security Agreement, dated as of December 1,
1999, between SpatiaLight, and the twenty-two lenders
listed on Schedule A to such form
10.11 Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of
December 1, 1999, between SpatiaLight, and the
twenty-two lenders listed on Exhibit A to such form
10.12 Form of Agreement and Warrant to Purchase Common
Shares, dated as of December 1, 1999, between
SpatiaLight, and the twenty-two lenders listed on the
Exhibit A of Convertible Secured Loan Agreement
10.13 Form of Convertible Secured Note, dated as of December
1, 1999, between SpatiaLight, and the twenty-two
lenders listed on Exhibit A of the Convertible Secured
Loan Agreement
10.14* Standard Office Lease, dated February 22, 1999, between Dennis A.
and Susan Johann Gilardi and SpatiaLight, Inc.
10.15 Employment Agreement between the Company and Michael H. Burney dated
December 31, 1999
10.16 Employment Agreement between the Company and Fred R. Hammett dated
December 31, 1999
10.17 Employment Agreement between the Company and Miles L. Scott dated
December 31, 1999
23.1 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors
23.2 Consent of KPMG, independent auditors
24.1* Power of Attorney (included in the Signature Page contained in Part
II of the Registration Statement)
27 Financial Data Schedule
* Previously filed.
42
In accordance with section 13 or 15(d) with the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 14th day of April 2000.
SPATIALIGHT, INC.
By: /s/ MICHAEL H. BURNEY
----------------------------------
Michael H. Burney
Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer, Secretary,
and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below
by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.
[Download Table]
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
/s/ MICHAEL H. BURNEY
---------------------------------
Michael H. Burney Chief Executive Officer, April 14, 2000
Treasurer, Secretary and Director
(Principal Executive, Financial
& Accounting Officer)
/s/ LAWRENCE J. MATTESON Director April 14, 2000
---------------------------------
Lawrence J. Matteson
/s/ ROBERT A. OLINS Director April 14, 2000
---------------------------------
Robert A. Olins
/s/ STEVEN F. TRIPP Director April 14, 2000
---------------------------------
Steven F. Tripp
43
EXHIBIT INDEX
[Download Table]
EXHIBIT # DESCRIPTION
--------- -----------
3.1* Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
3.2* Bylaws
10.1* 1991 Employee Stock Option Plan and Form of Stock Option Agreement
thereunder
10.2* 1993 Nonstatutory Employee Stock Option Plan and Form of Stock
Option Agreement thereunder
10.3* 1993 Nonstatutory Directors Stock Option Plan
10.4* 1999 Stock Option Plan
10.5* Form of Convertible Secured Loan Agreement, dated as
of November 1998, between SpatiaLight, and the
eighteen lenders listed on Exhibit A to such form
10.6* Form of Security Agreement, dated as of November 1998, between
SpatiaLight and the eighteen lenders listed on Exhibit A to such form
10.7* Form of Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of November
1998, among SpatiaLight, Argyle Capital Management
Corporation, Jerry Whitlock, Mansour Rasnavad, Network
Finance Incorporated, Farhad Azima and the eighteen
lenders listed on Exhibit A to such form
10.8* Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of
November 1998, between SpatiaLight and the eighteen
lenders listed on Exhibit A to such form
10.9 Form of Convertible Secured Loan Agreement, dated as
of December 1, 1999, between SpatiaLight, and the
twenty-two lenders listed on Exhibit A to such form
10.10 Form of Security Agreement, dated as of December 1,
1999, between SpatiaLight, and the twenty-two lenders
listed on Schedule A to such form
10.11 Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of
December 1, 1999, between SpatiaLight, and the
twenty-two lenders listed on Exhibit A to such form
10.12 Form of Agreement and Warrant to Purchase Common
Shares, dated as of December 1, 1999, between
SpatiaLight, and the twenty-two lenders listed on the
Exhibit A of Convertible Secured Loan Agreement
10.13 Form of Convertible Secured Note, dated as of December
1, 1999, between SpatiaLight, and the twenty-two
lenders listed on Exhibit A of the Convertible Secured
Loan Agreement
10.14* Standard Office Lease, dated February 22, 1999, between Dennis A.
and Susan Johann Gilardi and SpatiaLight, Inc.
10.15 Employment Agreement between the Company and Michael H. Burney dated
December 31, 1999
10.16 Employment Agreement between the Company and Fred R. Hammett dated
December 31, 1999
10.17 Employment Agreement between the Company and Miles L. Scott dated
December 31, 1999
23.1 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors
23.2 Consent of KPMG, independent auditors
24.1* Power of Attorney (included in the Signature Page contained in Part
II of the Registration Statement)
27 Financial Data Schedule
* Previously filed.
Dates Referenced Herein and Documents Incorporated by Reference
↑Top
Filing Submission 0000950149-00-000847 – Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)
Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
About — Privacy — Redactions — Help —
Thu., Apr. 25, 12:43:26.2am ET 
