SEC Info℠

Home

Search

My Interests

Help

Sign In

Please Sign In

Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. – ‘10-Q’ for 12/31/07

On:  Wednesday, 2/6/08, at 2:41pm ET   ·   For:  12/31/07   ·   Accession #:  1193125-8-21537   ·   File #:  1-32352

Previous ‘10-Q’:  ‘10-Q’ on 11/8/07 for 9/30/07   ·   Next:  ‘10-Q’ on 5/8/08 for 3/31/08   ·   Latest:  ‘10-Q’ on 2/6/19 for 12/31/18

in

this entire Filing. an “Entity” Search.

Show

Documents searched

and

each “hit”. the 1st “hit”.

↓↑Hints

 Text Wildcards:  ? (any letter/digit),  * (many).  Search Logic:  for Documents:  & (and),  | (or);  for Text:  | (anywhere),  "(&)" (near).  Details... 

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size              Issuer               Agent

 2/06/08  Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc.    10-Q       12/31/07    7:1.2M                                   RR Donnelley/FA

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: 10-Q        Quarterly Report                                    HTML    937K 
 2: EX-4.1      Registration Rights Agreement                       HTML    111K 
 3: EX-4.2      Form of 6.65% Senior Note                           HTML    100K 
 4: EX-12.1     Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                  HTML     17K 
 5: EX-31.1     Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Certification  HTML     15K 
 6: EX-31.2     Chief Financial Officer Certification               HTML     14K 
 7: EX-32.1     Certification of Chairman and CEO and CFO Pursuant  HTML      8K 
                          to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350                              

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

or

Commission file number 001-32352

NEWS CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (212) 852-7000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of February 1, 2008, 2,140,726,442 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 986,520,953 shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, were outstanding.

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in millions, except per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in millions, except share and per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in millions)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1—Basis of Presentation

News Corporation, a Delaware corporation, with its subsidiaries (together “News Corporation” or the “Company”), is a diversified entertainment company, which manages and reports its businesses in eight segments: Filmed Entertainment, Television, Cable Network Programming, Direct Broadcast Satellite Television (“DBS”), Magazines and Inserts, Newspapers and Information Services, Book Publishing and Other.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation have been reflected in these unaudited consolidated financial statements. Operating results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2008.

These interim unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on August 23, 2007.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of News Corporation and its subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Equity investments in which the Company exercises significant influence but does not exercise control and is not the primary beneficiary are accounted for using the equity method. Investments in which the Company is not able to exercise significant influence over the investee are accounted for under the cost method.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires that management make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Because of the use of estimates inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain fiscal 2007 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the fiscal 2008 presentation.

The Company maintains a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the Sunday nearest to each reporting date. As such, all references to December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 relate to the three and six month periods ended December 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. For convenience purposes, the Company continues to date its financial statements as of December 31.

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” total comprehensive income for the Company consists of the following:

6

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On July 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), which did not have a material impact to the Company’s liability for unrecognized tax benefits. Total unrecognized tax benefits at the date of adoption of FIN 48 were $2.2 billion, of which $2.0 billion would affect the Company’s effective income tax rate, if and when recognized in future fiscal years. The increase in the accrued balance during the six months ended December 31, 2007 was $210 million. The six month movement includes $27 million of acquired unrecognized tax benefits from the acquisition of Dow Jones & Company Inc. (“Dow Jones”). The Company does not presently anticipate such uncertain income tax positions will significantly increase or decrease in the next 12 months; however, actual developments in this area could differ from those currently expected. The implementation impact includes an increase in Other Liabilities of approximately $1.2 billion offset by a similar reduction in deferred income taxes as of July 1, 2007.

The Company recognizes interest and penalty charges related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense, which is consistent with the recognition in prior reporting periods. Through July 1, 2007, the Company had recorded liabilities for accrued interest of $258 million. The increase in the accrual for interest for the six months ended December 31, 2007 was $66 million, which includes $6 million of acquired interest from Dow Jones.

The Internal Revenue Service recently concluded its examination of the Company’s U.S. federal income tax returns through 2002, and has commenced examining the Company’s returns for the years subsequent to 2002. Additionally, the Company’s income tax returns for the years 2000 through 2006 are under examination in various foreign jurisdictions.

In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 141(revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141R”). SFAS No. 141R significantly changes the accounting for business combinations in a number of areas, including the treatment of contingent consideration, preacquisition contingencies, transaction costs, in-process research and development and restructuring costs. In addition, under SFAS No. 141R, changes in an acquired entity’s deferred tax assets and uncertain tax positions after the measurement period will impact income tax expense. SFAS No. 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 141R beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. This standard will change the Company’s accounting treatment for business combinations on a prospective basis.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 changes the accounting and reporting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. This new consolidation method significantly changes the accounting for transactions with minority interest holders. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 160 beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The Company is currently evaluating what effects, if any, the adoption of SFAS No. 160 will have on the Company’s future results of operations and financial condition.

7

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 2—Acquisitions, Disposals and Other Transactions

Fiscal 2008 Transactions

Acquisitions

In July 2007, the Company acquired Photobucket, a web-based provider of photo- and video-sharing services, for initial consideration of approximately $237 million in cash. Additional consideration of up to $50 million may be payable contingent upon the achievement of certain performance objectives.

On December 13, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of Dow Jones pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 31, 2007, by and among the Company, Ruby Newco LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Ruby Newco”), Dow Jones and Diamond Merger Sub Corporation, as amended (the “Merger Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, each share of Dow Jones common stock was converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder, either (x) $60.00 in cash or (y) 2.8681 Class B common units of Ruby Newco. Each Class B common unit of Ruby Newco is convertible after a period of time into a share of News Corporation Class A common stock. The consideration for the acquisition was approximately $5,700 million which consists of: $5,100 million in cash, assumed net debt of approximately $330 million, approximately $200 million in equity instruments and the Company anticipates making additional acquisition related cash payments of $100 million during the remainder of fiscal 2008. The results of Dow Jones have been included in the Company’s unaudited consolidated statement of operations from December 13, 2007, the date of acquisition.

As part of the Dow Jones acquisition, the Company assumed total debt of $378 million which consisted of: 3.875% notes due 2008 in the amount of $225 million, $131 million in commercial paper, and a $22 million variable interest note. In December, the Company retired all of the commercial paper outstanding.

In addition, in December 2007, the Company issued approximately 8 million Class B common units of Ruby Newco, approximately 7 million stock options and approximately 500,000 restricted share units over the Company’s Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Class A Common Stock”). The total fair value of these instruments was approximately $200 million.

News Corporation believes that this acquisition will position it as a leader in the financial news and information market and will enhance its ability to adapt to future challenges and opportunities within News Corporation’s Newspapers and Information Services segment and across the Company’s other related business segments.

The following Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statements of Operations give effect to the Company’s acquisition of Dow Jones, as if the acquisition had occurred on July 1, 2006.

8

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The unaudited pro forma data is provided for informational purposes only. The pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been obtained had the acquisition been completed at the dates indicated. In addition, the unaudited pro forma data does not purport to project the future financial position or operating results of the Company and Dow Jones.

Under the purchase method of accounting, the total purchase price is allocated to Dow Jones net tangible and intangible assets based upon Dow Jones’ estimated fair value as of the date of completion of the acquisition. Based upon the purchase price and the valuation performed, the preliminary purchase price allocation, which is subject to change based on the Company’s final analysis, is as follows:

The Company has not finalized the detailed valuation studies necessary to arrive at the required estimates of the fair market value of the Dow Jones assets acquired and the liabilities assumed and the related allocations of purchase price. The Company allocated, on a preliminary basis, approximately $600 million to amortizable intangible assets primarily consisting of subscriber relationship intangible assets with a weighted-average useful life of 25 years. The Company also allocated, on a preliminary basis, approximately $1,500 million to trade names, which will not be amortized as they have an indefinite remaining useful life based primarily on their market position and the Company’s plans for continued indefinite use. Further, approximately $4,000 million was preliminarily allocated to goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. The goodwill is not being amortized in accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” (“SFAS No. 142”) and is not deductible for tax purposes. The preliminary allocation of Goodwill is included in the Other segment, until the final valuation is complete. The amount of goodwill assumed will change depending on the fair values allocated to the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired. For every $25 million reduction in goodwill for additional value to be assigned to identifiable finite-lived intangible assets or tangible assets, Depreciation and amortization expense would increase by approximately $1 million per fiscal year, representing amortization expense assuming an average useful life of 25 years.

9

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Actual allocations may differ from these once the Company has completed the valuation studies necessary to finalize the required purchase price allocations and identified any necessary conforming accounting changes for Dow Jones. There can be no assurance that this finalization will not result in material changes to the purchase price allocation above.

As a result of the Dow Jones acquisition, the Company established and approved plans to integrate the acquired operations into the Company’s Newspapers and Information Services segment, for which the Company preliminarily recorded approximately $150 million in accrued liabilities in December 2007. These purchase accounting adjustments consist of separation payments for certain Dow Jones executives under the change in control plan Dow Jones had previously established, non-cancelable lease commitments and lease termination charges for leased facilities that will be exited and other contract termination costs associated with the restructuring activities. The finalization of certain of these actions could result in changes in the accrual amount.

Disposals

In November 2007, Dow Jones announced that it would explore strategic alternatives for the Ottaway Community Newspapers (the “Ottaway Newspapers”), which the Company acquired as part of the Dow Jones transaction. The strategic options include, but are not limited to, the possible sale of some or all of the Ottaway Newspapers’ publications and related properties. No agreement has yet been entered into with respect to any transaction involving the Ottaway Newspapers. At December 31, 2007, the assets and liabilities of the Ottaway Newspapers are classified as assets held for sale. Assets held for sale of $25 million and $423 million are included in Other current assets and Other non-current assets, respectively, and liabilities related to assets held for sale of $23 million are included in other current liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2007.

In December 2007, Fox Television Stations, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and FoxCo Acquisition Sub, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Oak Hill Capital Partners III, L.P. (“Oak Hill Capital”), entered into a Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell eight of its owned-and-operated FOX network affiliated television stations (the “Stations”) to Oak Hill Capital for approximately $1.1 billion in cash. The Stations include: WJW in Cleveland, OH; KDVR in Denver, CO; KTVI in St. Louis, MO; WDAF in Kansas City, MO; WITI in Milwaukee, WI; KSTU in Salt Lake City, UT; WBRC in Birmingham, AL; and WGHP in Greensboro, NC. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including, among other things, (a) regulatory approvals, (b) the receipt of the consent of the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”) relating to the assignment or transfer of control of the television broadcasting licenses issued by the FCC for the Stations and (c) with regard to two of the Stations only, certain other actions by the FCC in connection with the digital television facilities for the two Stations. In the event the closing condition described in (c) above is not satisfied or waived by Oak Hill Capital, the transaction shall be effected as a sale of six of the Stations, excluding the Stations described in (c) above, at an adjusted price. The transaction is expected to be completed in the third calendar quarter of 2008.

Fiscal 2007 Transactions

Acquisitions

In November 2006, the Company, together with a local Turkish partner, acquired TGRT (now called “FOX TV”), a national general interest free-to-air broadcast television station in Turkey. The Company acquired its interest for approximately $103 million in cash plus acquisition related costs.

10

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In December 2006, NDS Group plc (“NDS”), an indirect majority owned subsidiary of the Company, acquired Jungo Limited (“Jungo”), a developer and supplier of software for use in residential gateway devices, for approximately $91 million.

In January 2007, the Company and VeriSign, Inc. (“VeriSign”) formed a joint venture to provide entertainment content for mobile devices. The Company paid approximately $190 million for a controlling interest in VeriSign’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Jamba, which was combined with certain of the Company’s FOX Mobile Entertainment assets. The results of the joint venture have been included in the Company’s consolidated results of operations since January 2007. The Company and VeriSign have various put and call rights related to VeriSign’s ownership interests, including VeriSign’s right to put its interest in the joint venture to the Company for $150 million and $350 million, in fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2012, respectively. The Company accounts for the VeriSign put rights in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Topic No. D-98, “Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities” (“EITF D-98”) because their exercise is outside the control of the Company and, accordingly, as of December 31, 2007, has reflected the accreted value of the put right in minority interest in subsidiaries in its unaudited consolidated balance sheet. The accreted value of VeriSign’s put right was determined by using the interest method and accreting the minority interest balance up to the fixed price put amount in fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2012. At December 31, 2007, the accreted value of VeriSign’s put right was determined using an annual interest rate of 12%.

In March 2007, the Company acquired Strategic Data Corporation (“SDC”), a developer of technology that allows websites to target advertisements to specific audiences. The Company acquired SDC for a total purchase price of $50 million, of which $40 million was in cash and $10 million in deferred consideration. The Company may be required to pay up to an additional $310 million through fiscal 2010 contingent upon SDC achieving specified advertising rate growth in future periods.

In April 2007, the Company completed its acquisition of Federal Publishing Company’s (“FPC”) magazines, newspapers and online properties in Australia from F Hannan Pty Limited for approximately $393 million.

In accordance with SFAS No. 142 the excess purchase price that has been allocated or has been preliminarily allocated to goodwill is not being amortized for all of the acquisitions noted above. Where the allocation of the excess purchase price is not final, the amount allocated to goodwill is subject to changes upon completion of final valuations of certain assets and liabilities. A future reduction in goodwill for additional value to be assigned to identifiable finite-lived intangible assets or tangible assets could reduce future earnings as a result of additional amortization. For every $10 million reduction in goodwill for additional value to be assigned to identifiable finite-lived intangible assets or tangible assets, Depreciation and amortization expense would increase by approximately $1 million per fiscal year, representing amortization expense assuming an average useful life of ten years.

The aforementioned acquisitions were all accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.”

Share Exchange Agreement

On December 22, 2006, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) with Liberty Media Corporation (“Liberty”). Under the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement, Liberty will exchange its entire interest in the Company’s common stock (approximately 325 million shares of Class A Common Stock and 188 million shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Class B Common Stock”)) for 100% of a News Corporation subsidiary (“Splitco”), whose holdings will consist of an

11

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

approximately 41% interest (approximately 470 million shares) in The DIRECTV Group, Inc. (“DIRECTV”) constituting the Company’s entire interest in DIRECTV, three of the Company’s Regional Sports Networks (“RSNs”) (FSN Northwest, FSN Pittsburgh and FSN Rocky Mountain (the “Three RSNs”)) and $588 million in cash, subject to adjustment. The transaction contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement was approved by the Company’s Class B common stockholders on April 3, 2007, but remains subject to customary closing conditions, including, among other things, regulatory approvals and the absence of a material adverse effect on Splitco. If these conditions are satisfied, the transaction is expected to be completed no later than the first quarter of calendar 2008. The Company will enter into a non-competition agreement with DIRECTV and non-competition agreements with each of the Three RSNs, in each case, restricting its right to compete for a period of four years with DIRECTV and the Three RSNs in the respective regions in which such entities are operating on the date the Share Exchange Agreement is consummated.

Other Transactions

In fiscal 2007, the Company restructured the ownership interest in one of its majority-owned RSNs. The minority shareholder has a put right related to its ownership interest that is currently exercisable and is outside of the control of the Company. The Company accounts for this put arrangement in accordance with EITF D-98, and, as of December 31, 2007, has included the value of the put right in minority interest in subsidiaries in the consolidated balance sheet. The fair value of the minority shareholder’s put right was determined by using a discounted earnings (losses) before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization valuation model, assuming a 10% compounded annual growth rate and a 9% discount rate.

Note 3—Receivables, net

Receivables, net are presented net of an allowance for returns and doubtful accounts, which is an estimate of amounts that may not be collectible. In determining the allowance for returns, management analyzes historical returns, current economic trends and changes in customer demand and acceptance of the Company’s products. Based on this information, management reserves a percentage of each dollar of product sales that provide the customer with the right of return. The allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on historical experience, receivable aging, current economic trends, and specific identification of certain receivables that are at risk of not being paid. Receivables, net consist of:

Note 4—United Kingdom Redundancy Program

In fiscal 2005, the Company announced its intention to invest in new printing plants in the United Kingdom to take advantage of technological and market changes. As the new automated technology comes on line, the Company expects lower production costs and improved newspaper quality, including expanded color.

12

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In conjunction with this project, during the second quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company received formal approval for the construction of the main new plant which was the last contingency, thereby committing the Company to a redundancy program (the “Program”) for certain production employees at the Company’s U.K. newspaper operations. The Program is in response to the reduced workforce that will be required as new printing presses and the new printing facilities come on line. As a result of this Program, the Company expects to reduce its production workforce by approximately 65%, and as of December 31, 2007, over 700 employees in the United Kingdom had already accepted severance agreements and are expected to leave the Company during fiscal 2008.

In accordance with SFAS No. 88, “Employers’ Accounting for Settlements & Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits,” the Company recorded a redundancy provision in connection with the Program. Changes in the program liabilities are as follows:

At December 31, 2007, all program liabilities were included in other current liabilities in the unaudited consolidated balance sheet. The Company expects to record an additional provision of approximately $3 million during the remainder of fiscal 2008 to record accretion on the redundancy provision and to recognize any retention bonuses earned. A majority of the Program’s costs are expected to be paid in cash to employees during the remainder of fiscal 2008.

13

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 5—Inventories, net

The Company’s inventories were comprised of the following:

14

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 6—Investments

The Company’s investments were comprised of the following:

Fiscal Year 2008 Disposals and Other Transactions

In July 2007, the Company and its joint venture partner sold a majority of the cable systems in Taiwan, in which the Company maintains a minority interest ownership, to a third party. The Company recognized total consideration of $315 million of which $288 million was paid in cash and $27 million is receivable subject to final closing adjustments. The Company recognized a pre-tax gain of approximately $102 million on the sale included in Other, net in the unaudited consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended December 31, 2007. The Company and its joint venture partner intend to sell the remaining Taiwan cable systems in fiscal 2008.

Effective September 30, 2007, National Geographic Television agreed to give the Company control over NGC US in which the Company has a 67% equity interest. Accordingly, the results of NGC US were included in the Company’s unaudited consolidated results of operations beginning October 1, 2007.

During the six months ended December 31, 2007, the Company effectively acquired an additional 27% stake in NGC Network (UK) Limited (“NGC UK”) in exchange for a 23% interest NGC Network International LLC (“NGC International”) and a 14% interest in NGC Network Latin America LLC (“NGC Latin America”). As a result of this transaction, the Company owns 52% of NGC International, NGC Latin America and NGC UK. In January 2007, the Company obtained operating control over NGC International and NGC Latin America

15

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

and has included their results in the Company’s consolidated results of operations since January 2007. The Company has included the operating results of NGC UK in the Company’s consolidated results in the six months ended December 31, 2007.

In December 2007, Macrovision Corporation agreed to acquire Gemstar-TV Guide in a cash and stock transaction. The closing of this transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including the approval of the shareholders of both Macrovision Corporation and Gemstar-TV Guide.

Fiscal Year 2007 Acquisitions and Disposals

In August 2006, the Company sold a portion of its equity investment in Phoenix Satellite Television Holdings Limited (“Phoenix”), representing a 19.9%, stake for approximately $164 million. The Company recognized a pre-tax gain of approximately $136 million on the sale included in Other, net in the unaudited consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended December 31, 2006. The Company retained a 17.6% stake in Phoenix, which is accounted for under the cost method of accounting and, accordingly, the carrying value is adjusted to market value each reporting period as required under SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.”

In August 2006, the Company completed the sale of its investment in SKY Brasil, a Brazilian DTH platform, to DIRECTV for approximately $300 million in cash which was received in fiscal 2005 resulting in a total pre-tax gain of $426 million on the sale. Of this total gain, the Company recognized a pre-tax gain of approximately $261 million, which was included in Other, net in the consolidated statement of operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. The Company deferred the remaining $165 million of its total gain due to its indirect retained interest through the Company’s ownership of DIRECTV. The Company will recognize the deferred portion of the gain on SKY Brasil upon disposition of its investment in DIRECTV or DIRECTV’s disposition of its investment in SKY Brasil. The total gain of $426 million was greater than the total consideration received due to the recognition of losses in excess of the carrying amount of the investment as the Company was committed to provide further financial support to SKY Brasil. As a result of the transaction, the Company was released from its SKY Brasil transponder lease guarantee and was released from its SKY Brasil credit agreement guarantee in January 2007.

In December 2006, the Company acquired 25% stakes in each of NGC International and NGC UK joint ventures for a combined total of approximately $154 million. These two joint ventures produce and distribute the National Geographic Channel in various international markets. The transaction increased the Company’s interest in NGC International to 75% with National Geographic Television holding the remaining interest. In January 2007, National Geographic Television agreed to grant the Company operating control over these entities. Accordingly, the results of NGC International and NGC Latin America have been included in the Company’s consolidated results of operations since January 2007.

Summarized financial information for significant equity affiliates, determined in accordance with Regulation S-X, accounted for under the equity method is as follows:

16

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 7—Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, the Company’s intangible assets and related accumulated amortization are as follows:

The changes in carrying value of goodwill, by segment, are as follows:

Goodwill balances increased $4,475 million during the six months ended December 31, 2007, primarily as a result of new acquisitions. The increased goodwill balance at the Other segment arose from the acquisitions of Dow Jones and Photobucket (See Note 2—Acquisitions, Disposals and Other Transactions.) The consolidation of NGC US beginning October 1, 2007 led to an increase in goodwill at the Cable segment (See Note 6—Investments.) Adjustments primarily relate to the finalization of purchase price allocations for previously announced acquisitions and foreign currency translation adjustments.

17

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 8—Borrowings

Bank Loans

The Company previously entered into two loan agreements with the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (the “EBRD”) and had an outstanding balance of $154 million under these loans at June 30, 2006. In August 2006, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG (“RZB”) for $300 million and repaid all amounts outstanding under the Company’s loan agreements with the EBRD. As of December 31, 2007, $106 million remains available for future use under the RZB loan. The RZB loan bears interest at LIBOR for a period equal to each one, three or six month interest period, plus a margin of up to 2.85% per annum dependent upon certain financial metrics. Principal amounts under the RZB loan are to be repaid in equal amounts every six months starting on the second anniversary of the date of the agreement until the fifth anniversary of the date of the agreement. The remaining available amount under the RZB loan may be drawn prior to the second anniversary of the date of the agreement. The loans are secured by certain guarantees, bank accounts and share pledges of the Company’s Russian operating subsidiaries.

Notes due 2037

In November 2007, the Company issued $1,250 million of 6.65% Senior Notes due 2037. The net proceeds of approximately $1,248 million will be used for general corporate purposes. These notes were issued under the Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of March 24, 1993, as supplemented, among News America Incorporated, the guarantor named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, as Trustee.

Note 9—Stockholders’ Equity

Rights of Holders of Common Stock

On August 8, 2006, the Company announced that, in accordance with the terms of the settlement of a lawsuit regarding the Company’s stockholder rights plan, the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) had approved the adoption of an Amended and Restated Rights Plan (the “Rights Plan”), extending the term of the Company’s original stockholder rights plan from November 7, 2007 to October 20, 2008. The Board has the right to extend the term for an additional year if the situation with Liberty has not, in the Board’s judgment, been resolved. The terms of the Rights Plan remain the same as the Company’s original stockholder rights plan in all other material respects. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, on October 20, 2006, the Rights Plan was presented for a vote of the Company’s Class B stockholders at the Company’s 2006 annual meeting of stockholders and the stockholders voted in favor of its approval. On January 3, 2007, the Rights Plan was amended to allow for the grant of an irrevocable proxy to Liberty in connection with the Share Exchange Agreement. The Company has announced that it intends to redeem the rights issued under the Rights Plan if the transactions contemplated under the Share Exchange Agreement are consummated. (See Note 2—Acquisitions, Disposals and Other Transactions for further discussion of the Share Exchange Agreement)

Dividends

The Company declared a dividend of $0.06 per share of Class A Common Stock and $0.05 per share of Class B Common Stock in the three months ended September 30, 2007, which was paid in October 2007 to stockholders of record on September 12, 2007. The total aggregate dividend paid to stockholders in October 2007 was approximately $179 million.

18

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Repurchase Program

In June 2005, the Company announced a stock repurchase program under which the Company was authorized to acquire from time to time up to an aggregate of $3 billion in Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock. In May 2006, the Company announced that the Board had authorized increasing the total amount of the stock repurchase program to $6 billion. The remaining authorized amount under the Company’s stock repurchase program at December 31, 2007, excluding commissions, was approximately $2 billion.

Note 10—Equity Based Compensation

The following table summarizes the Company’s equity-based compensation transactions:

At December 31, 2007, the Company’s total compensation cost related to non-vested stock options, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and stock appreciation rights not yet recognized for all plans was approximately $292 million, the majority of which is expected to be recognized over the next three fiscal years. Compensation expense on all equity-based awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the entire award.

Stock options exercised during the six months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 resulted in the Company’s issuance of approximately 4 million and 11 million shares of Class A Common Stock, respectively. The Company recognized a tax benefit on stock options exercised of $9 million and $26 million for the six months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

During the six months ended December 31, 2007, the Company issued 5.6 million RSUs. These RSUs will be settled in shares of Class A Common Stock upon vesting, except for approximately 1 million RSUs that will be settled in cash. RSUs granted to executive directors are settled in cash and certain awards granted to employees in certain foreign locations are settled in cash. At December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2007, the liability for cash-settled RSUs was $33 million and $47 million, respectively.

During the six months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, approximately 5.3 million and 4.0 million RSUs vested, respectively, of which approximately 4.6 million and 3.4 million, respectively, were settled in Class A Common Stock, before statutory tax withholdings, and the remaining RSUs were settled in cash. The Company recognized a tax benefit on vested RSUs of $5 million and $7 million for the six months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Note 11—Commitments and Guarantees

Commitments

In July 2007, the Company entered into a contract with the Big Ten Conference for rights to telecast certain Big Ten Conference sporting events through fiscal 2032. The Company will pay approximately $2.8 billion over the term of the contract for these rights.

19

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In November 2007, the Company entered into a long-term supply contract pursuant to which the Company will purchase paper for its newspaper printing facilities in the United Kingdom from a third party. The contract requires the Company to purchase a minimum of $590 million of paper from this third party through fiscal 2015.

In December 2007, as part of the Dow Jones acquisition, the Company assumed approximately $994 million of commitments previously entered into by Dow Jones which included $247 million of indebtedness at December 31, 2007.

Other than previously disclosed in the notes to these unaudited consolidated financial statements, the Company’s commitments have not changed significantly from disclosures included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 filed with the SEC on August 23, 2007.

Guarantees

Other than previously disclosed in the notes to these unaudited consolidated financial statements, the Company’s guarantees have not changed significantly from disclosures included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 filed with the SEC on August 23, 2007.

Note 12—Contingencies

NDS

Echostar Litigation

On June 6, 2003, Echostar Communications Corporation, Echostar Satellite Corporation, Echostar Technologies Corporation and Nagrastar L.L.C. (collectively, “Echostar”) filed an action against NDS in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Echostar filed an amended complaint on October 8, 2003, which purported to allege claims for violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”), the Communications Act of 1934 (“CA”), the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, California’s Unfair Competition statute and the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”) statute. The complaint also purported to allege claims for civil conspiracy, misappropriation of trade secrets and interference with prospective business advantage. The complaint sought injunctive relief, unspecified compensatory and exemplary damages and restitution. On December 22, 2003, all of the claims were dismissed by the court, except for the DMCA, CA and unfair competition claims, and the court limited these claims to acts allegedly occurring within three years of the filing of Echostar’s original complaint.

After Echostar filed a second amended complaint, NDS filed a motion to dismiss this complaint on March 31, 2004. On July 21, 2004, the court issued an order directing Echostar to, among other things, file a third amended complaint within ten days correcting various deficiencies noted in the second amended complaint. Echostar filed its third amended complaint on August 4, 2004. On August 6, 2004, the court ruled that NDS was free to file a motion to dismiss the third amended complaint, which NDS did on September 20, 2004. The hearing occurred on January 3, 2005. On February 28, 2005, the court issued an order treating NDS’s motion to dismiss as a motion for a more definite statement, granting the motion and giving Echostar until March 30, 2005 to file a fourth amended complaint correcting various deficiencies noted in the third amended complaint. On March 30, 2005, Echostar filed a fourth amended complaint, which NDS moved to dismiss. On July 27, 2005, the court granted in part and denied in part NDS’s motion to dismiss, and again limited Echostar’s surviving claims to acts allegedly occurring within three years of the filing of Echostar’s original complaint. NDS’s management believes these surviving claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them.

20

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On October 24, 2005, NDS filed its Amended Answer with Counterclaims, alleging that Echostar misappropriated NDS’s trade secrets, violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and engaged in unfair competition. On November 8, 2005, Echostar moved to dismiss NDS’s counterclaims for conversion and claim and delivery, arguing that these claims were preempted and time-barred. Echostar also moved for a more definite statement of NDS’s trade secret misappropriation claim. On December 8, 2005, the court granted in part and denied in part Echostar’s motion to dismiss and for a more definite statement, but granted NDS leave to file amended counterclaims. On December 13, 2005, NDS filed a Second Amended Answer with Counterclaims, which Echostar answered on December 27, 2005. NDS filed motions for summary judgment dismissing EchoStar’s claims and EchoStar filed a motion for summary judgment dismissing NDS’ counterclaims on October 29, 2007. Those motions were heard on January 7, 2008. On January 16, 2008, the court granted the motions in part and denied them in part. The court has set this case to go to trial in April 2008.

Sogecable Litigation

On July 25, 2003, Sogecable, S.A. and its subsidiary Canalsatellite Digital, S.L., Spanish satellite broadcasters and customers of Canal+ Technologies SA (together, “Sogecable”), filed an action against NDS in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Sogecable filed an amended complaint on October 9, 2003, which purported to allege claims for violation of the DMCA and the federal RICO statute. The amended complaint also purported to allege claims for interference with contract and prospective business advantage. The complaint sought injunctive relief, unspecified compensatory and exemplary damages and restitution. On December 22, 2003, all of the claims were dismissed by the court. Sogecable filed a second amended complaint. NDS filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint on March 31, 2004. On August 4, 2004, the court issued an order dismissing the second amended complaint in its entirety. Sogecable had until October 4, 2004 to file a third amended complaint. On October 1, 2004, Sogecable notified the court that it would not be filing a third amended complaint, but would appeal the court’s entry of final judgment dismissing the suit to the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. On December 14, 2006, the appellate court issued a memorandum decision reversing the district court’s dismissal. On January 26, 2007, NDS filed its petition for rehearing by an en banc panel of the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. On February 21, 2007, the petition was denied. On June 11, 2007, NDS filed a petition for a Writ of Certiorari in the United States Supreme Court seeking reversal of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision. On August 27, 2007, NDS renewed its motion to dismiss the second amended complaint on grounds not previously decided. On October 1, 2007, the petition for a Writ of Certiorari was denied. On January 25, 2008, the court issued an order granting-in-part and denying-in-part the Company’s renewed motion to dismiss Sogecable’s second amended complaint. The court dismissed Sogecable’s claim for tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, but allowed Sogecable to proceed on its RICO and DMCA claims, as well as its claim for tortious interference with contract. The court has set June 2, 2009 as the trial date. NDS believes that Sogecable’s claims are without merit and will continue to vigorously defend itself in this matter.

Intermix

FIM Transaction

On August 26, 2005 and August 30, 2005, two purported class action lawsuits captioned, respectively, Ron Sheppard v. Richard Rosenblatt et. al., and John Friedmann v. Intermix Media, Inc. et al., were filed in the California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles. Both lawsuits named as defendants all of the then incumbent members of the Intermix Board, including Mr. Rosenblatt, Intermix’s former Chief Executive Officer, and certain entities affiliated with VantagePoint Venture Partners (“VantagePoint”), a former major Intermix stockholder. The complaints alleged that, in pursuing the transaction whereby Intermix was to be acquired by FIM (the “FIM Transaction”) and approving the related merger agreement, the director defendants breached their

21

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

fiduciary duties to Intermix stockholders by, among other things, engaging in self-dealing and failing to obtain the highest price reasonably available for Intermix and its stockholders. The complaints further alleged that the merger agreement resulted from a flawed process and that the defendants tailored the terms of the merger to advance their own interests. The FIM Transaction was consummated on September 30, 2005. The Friedmann and Sheppard lawsuits were subsequently consolidated and, on January 17, 2006, a consolidated amended complaint was filed (the “Intermix Media Shareholder Litigation”). The plaintiffs in the consolidated action sought various forms of declaratory relief, damages, disgorgement and fees and costs. On March 20, 2006, the court ordered that substantially identical claims asserted in a separate state action filed by Brad Greenspan, captioned Greenspan v. Intermix Media, Inc., et al., be severed and related to the Intermix Media Shareholder Litigation. The defendants filed demurrers seeking dismissal of all claims in the Intermix Media Shareholder Litigation and the severed Greenspan claims, which were heard by the court on July 6, 2006. On October 6, 2006, the court sustained the demurrers without leave to amend. On December 13, 2006, the court dismissed the complaints and entered judgment for the defendants. Greenspan and plaintiffs in the Intermix Media Shareholder Litigation filed notices of appeal, and subsequently filed respective opening briefs on appeal in October 2007. Defendants intend to file opposing briefs on appeal. The Court of Appeal has not yet heard argument in the matter.

In November 2005, plaintiff in a derivative action captioned LeBoyer v. Greenspan et al. pending against various former Intermix directors and officers in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, filed a First Amended Class and Derivative Complaint (the “Amended Complaint”). The original derivative action was filed in May 2003 and arose out of Intermix’s restatement of quarterly financial results for its fiscal year ended March 31, 2003. Until the filing of the Amended Complaint, the action had been stayed by mutual agreement of the parties since its inception. A substantially similar derivative action filed in Los Angeles Superior Court was dismissed based on inability of the plaintiffs to adequately plead demand futility. Plaintiff LeBoyer’s November 2005 Amended Complaint added various allegations and purported class claims arising out of the FIM Transaction which are substantially similar to those asserted in the Intermix Media Shareholder Litigation. The Amended Complaint also added as defendants the individuals and entities named in the Intermix Media Shareholder Litigation that were not already defendants in the matter. On July 14, 2006, the parties filed their briefing on defendants’ motion to dismiss and stay the matter. On October 16, 2006, the court dismissed the fourth through seventh claims for relief, which related to the 2003 restatement, finding that the plaintiff is precluded from relitigating demand futility. At the same time, the court asked for further briefing regarding plaintiffs’ standing to assert derivative claims based on the FIM Transaction, including for alleged violation of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the effect of the state judge’s dismissal of the claims in the Greenspan case and the Intermix Media Shareholder Litigation on the remaining direct class action claims alleging breaches of fiduciary duty and other common law claims leading up to the FIM Transaction. The parties filed the requested additional briefing in which the defendants requested that the court stay the direct LeBoyer claims pending the resolution of any appeal in the Greenspan case and the Intermix Media Shareholder Litigation. The court took the matter under submission. By order dated May 22, 2007, the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the derivative claims arising out of the FIM Transaction, and denied the defendants’ request to stay the two remaining direct claims. As explained in more detail in the next paragraph, the court subsequently consolidated this case with the Brown v. Brewer action also pending before the court. On July 11, 2007, plaintiffs filed the consolidated first amended complaint. Pursuant to the stipulated briefing schedule ordered by the court, the parties’ joint brief on defendants’ motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint was filed on October 11, 2007 and taken under submission. By order dated January 17, 2008, the court granted in part defendants’ motion to dismiss, with leave to amend, as explained in greater detail under the discussion of the consolidated case, Brown v. Brewer, below.

On June 14, 2006, a purported class action lawsuit, captioned Jim Brown v. Brett C. Brewer, et al., was filed against certain former Intermix directors and officers in the United States District Court for the Central District of

22

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

California. The plaintiff asserted claims for alleged violations of Section 14a of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule 14a-9, as well as control person liability under Section 20a. The plaintiff alleged that certain defendants disseminated false and misleading definitive proxy statements on two occasions: one on December 30, 2003 in connection with the shareholder vote on January 29, 2004 on the election of directors and ratification of financing transactions with certain entities of VantagePoint, and another on August 25, 2005 in connection with the shareholder vote on the FIM Transaction. The complaint named as defendants certain VantagePoint related entities and the members of the Intermix Board who were incumbent on the dates of the respective proxy statements. Intermix was not named as a defendant, but has certain indemnity obligations to the former officer and director defendants in connection with these claims and allegations. Intermix believes that the claims are without merit and expects that the individual defendants will vigorously defend themselves in the matter. On August 25, 2006, plaintiff amended his complaint to add certain investment banks (the “Investment Banks”) as defendants. Intermix has certain indemnity obligations to the Investment Banks as well. Plaintiff amended his complaint again on September 27, 2006. On October 19, 2006, defendants filed motions to dismiss all claims in the Second Amended Complaint. These motions were scheduled to be heard on February 12, 2007. On February 9, 2007, the case was transferred from Judge Walter to Judge George H. King, the judge assigned to the LeBoyer action on the grounds that it raises substantially related questions of law and fact as LeBoyer, and would entail substantial duplication of labor if heard by different judges. Judge King took the February 26, 2007 hearing date for the motions to dismiss off-calendar. On June 11, 2007, Judge King ordered the Brown case be consolidated with the LeBoyer action, ordered plaintiffs’ counsel to file a consolidated first amended complaint, and further ordered the parties to file a joint brief on defendants’ contemplated motion to dismiss the consolidated first amended complaint. On July 11, 2007, plaintiffs filed the consolidated first amended complaint. Pursuant to the stipulated briefing schedule ordered by the court, the parties’ joint brief on defendants’ motion to dismiss was filed on October 11, 2007 and was taken under submission without a hearing. By order dated January 17, 2008, Judge King granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the 2003 proxy claims (concerning VantagePoint transactions) and the 2005 proxy claims (concerning the FIM Transaction), as well as a claim against the VantagePoint entities alleging unjust enrichment. The court found it unnecessary to rule on dismissal of the remaining claims, which are related to the 2005 FIM Transaction, because the dismissal disposed of those claims. The court granted plaintiffs until February 8, 2008 to file an amended complaint. Intermix believes that the claims are without merit and expects that the defendants will continue to vigorously defend themselves in the matter.

Greenspan Litigation

On February 10, 2005, Brad Greenspan, Intermix’s former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer who was asked to resign as CEO and was removed as Chairman in the fall of 2003, filed a derivative complaint in Los Angeles Superior Court against Intermix, various of its former directors and officers, VantagePoint and certain of VantagePoint’s principals and affiliates. The complaint alleged claims of libel and fraud against Intermix and various of its then current and former officers and directors, claims of intentional interference with contract and prospective economic advantage, unfair competition and fraud against VantagePoint and certain of its affiliates and principals and claims alleging that Intermix’s forecasts of profitability leading up to its January 2004 annual stockholder meeting and associated proxy contest waged by Mr. Greenspan were false and misleading. These claims generally related to Intermix’s decision to consummate its Series C Preferred Stock financing with VantagePoint in October 2003, Mr. Greenspan’s contemporaneous separation from Intermix and matters arising during the proxy contest. The complaint also alleged that Intermix’s acquisition of the assets of a company known as Supernation LLC (“Supernation”) in July 2004 involved breaches of fiduciary duty. Mr. Greenspan sought remittance of compensation received by the various then current and former Intermix director and officer defendants, unspecified damages, removal of various Intermix directors, disgorgement of unspecified profits, reformation of the Supernation purchase, punitive damages, fees and costs, injunctive relief and other remedies. Intermix and the other defendants filed motions challenging the validity of the action and Mr. Greenspan’s ability to pursue it. Mr. Greenspan voluntarily dismissed this action in October 2005.

23

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Prior to dismissing his derivative lawsuit, in August 2005, Mr. Greenspan filed another complaint in Los Angeles Superior Court against the same defendants. The complaint, for breach of fiduciary duty, included substantially the same allegations made by Mr. Greenspan in the above-referenced lawsuit. Mr. Greenspan further alleged that defendants’ actions have, with the FIM Transaction, culminated in the loss of Mr. Greenspan’s interest in Intermix for a cash payment allegedly below its value. On October 31, 2005, the defendants filed motions seeking dismissal of the lawsuit on the grounds that the complaint failed to state any cause of action. Instead of responding to these motions, Mr. Greenspan filed an amended complaint on February 21, 2006, in which Mr. Greenspan omitted certain previously named defendants and added two other former directors as defendants. In this amended complaint, Mr. Greenspan asserted seven causes of action. The first two causes of action, for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage and violation of California’s Business Professions Code section 17200, generally related to Intermix’s decision to consummate its Series C Preferred Stock financing with VantagePoint in October 2003 and allege that Mr. Greenspan was “forced” to resign. The third through sixth causes of action asserted various claims for breach of fiduciary duty related to the FIM Transaction and substantially mirrored the allegations in the Intermix Media Shareholder Litigation. By Order of March 20, 2006, the court ordered that Mr. Greenspan’s claims based on the FIM Transaction be severed from the rest of his complaint and coordinated with the claims asserted in the Intermix Media Shareholder Litigation. Mr. Greenspan asserted a seventh cause of action against Intermix for indemnification. In his amended complaint, Mr. Greenspan sought compensatory and consequential damages, punitive damages, fees and costs, injunctive relief and other remedies. Motions to dismiss the first six causes of action were filed and, on October 6, 2006, granted without leave to amend. On November 21, 2006, Mr. Greenspan dismissed with prejudice the seventh cause of action for indemnity, which was the only remaining claim and his sole cause of action against Intermix. On January 24, 2007, Mr. Greenspan filed a notice of appeal of the court’s October 6, 2006 ruling. Mr. Greenspan’s opening brief in the Court of Appeal was filed on October 23, 2007.

Other

Other than previously disclosed in the notes to these unaudited consolidated financial statements, the Company is party to several other purchase and sale arrangements which become exercisable over the next ten years by the Company or the counter-party to the agreement. In the next twelve months, none of these arrangements that become exercisable are material. Purchase arrangements that are exercisable by the counter-party to the agreement, and that are outside the sole control of the Company are accounted for in accordance with EITF D-98. Accordingly, the fair values of such purchase arrangements are classified in Minority interest liabilities.

The Company experiences routine litigation in the normal course of its business. The Company believes that none of its pending litigation will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition, future results of operations or liquidity.

The Company’s operations are subject to tax in various domestic and international jurisdictions and as a matter of course, the Company is regularly audited by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. The Company believes it has appropriately accrued for the expected outcome of all pending tax matters and does not currently anticipate that the ultimate resolution of pending tax matters will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition, future results of operations or liquidity.

Note 13—Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits

The Company sponsors non-contributory pension plans and retiree health and life insurance benefit plans covering specific groups of employees. The benefits payable for the non-contributory pension plans are based

24

Table of Contents

NEWS CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

primarily on a formula factoring both an employee’s years of service and pay near retirement. Participant employees are vested in the plans after five years of service. The Company’s policy for all pension plans is to fund amounts, at a minimum, in accordance with statutory requirements. During the six months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company made discretionary contributions of $12 million and $18 million, respectively, to its pension plans. Plan assets consist principally of common stocks, marketable bonds and government securities. The retiree health and life insurance benefit plans offer medical and/or life insurance to certain full-time employees and eligible dependents that retire after fulfilling age and service requirements.

The components of net periodic benefit costs were as follows: