SEC Info  
    Home      Search      My Interests      Help      Sign In      Please Sign In

Triton Energy Ltd – ‘10-K/A’ for 12/31/99

On:  Tuesday, 8/1/00, at 5:22pm ET   ·   For:  12/31/99   ·   Accession #:  1009404-0-30   ·   File #:  1-11675

Previous ‘10-K’:  ‘10-K/A’ on 3/16/00 for 12/31/99   ·   Next & Latest:  ‘10-K’ on 3/15/01 for 12/31/00

Find Words in Filings emoji
 
  in    Show  and   Hints

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size

 8/01/00  Triton Energy Ltd                 10-K/A     12/31/99    1:137K

Amendment to Annual Report   —   Form 10-K
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: 10-K/A      Amendment to Annual Report                            57±   253K 


Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page   -   Filing Submission
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
"Report of Independent Accountants
4NOLs
10-K/A1st “Page” of 16TOCTopPreviousNextBottomJust 1st
 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K/A (AMENDMENT NO. 3) (Mark One) ( X ) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED: December 31, 1999 OR ( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ___________ TO ______________ Commission File Number: 1-11675 TRITON ENERGY LIMITED (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) CAYMAN ISLANDS NONE (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) CALEDONIAN HOUSE JENNETT STREET, P.O. BOX 1043 GEORGE TOWN GRAND CAYMAN, CAYMAN ISLANDS NONE (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 345-949-0050 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE TITLE OF EACH CLASS ON WHICH REGISTERED ---------------------- ------------------- Ordinary Shares, $.01 par value New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None. INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS (OR FOR SUCH SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO FILE SUCH REPORTS), AND (2) HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS. YES [ X ] NO [ -------- ] INDICATE BY CHECK MARK IF DISCLOSURE OF DELINQUENT FILERS PURSUANT TO ITEM 405 OF REGULATION S-K (SECTION 229.405 OF THIS CHAPTER) IS NOT CONTAINED HEREIN, AND WILL NOT BE CONTAINED, TO THE BEST OF REGISTRANT'S KNOWLEDGE, IN DEFINITIVE PROXY OR INFORMATION STATEMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN PART III OF THIS FORM 10-K OR ANY AMENDMENT TO THIS FORM 10-K. [ ] --------- THE AGGREGATE MARKET VALUE OF THE OUTSTANDING ORDINARY SHARES HELD BY NON-AFFILIATES OF THE REGISTRANT AT MARCH 7, 2000 (FOR SUCH PURPOSES ONLY, ALL DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ARE PRESUMED TO BE AFFILIATES) WAS APPROXIMATELY $1.0 BILLION, BASED ON THE CLOSING SALES PRICE OF $30.25 ON THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE. AS OF MARCH 7, 2000, 35,944,174 ORDINARY SHARES OF THE REGISTRANT WERE OUTSTANDING. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE PORTIONS OF THE PROXY STATEMENT PERTAINING TO THE 2000 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF TRITON ENERGY LIMITED ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO PART III HEREOF. ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA Triton Energy Limited (the "Company") hereby amends Item 8 of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999. The Company is amending this report to reflect a revision in the method pursuant to which the Company accounts for accumulated dividends on preference shares for purposes of determining earnings applicable to ordinary shares and earnings per share. The Company has included the dividends accumulated during each quarter in respect of its preference shares, whether or not declared for purposes of arriving at earnings applicable to ordinary shares, rather than including accumulated dividends only in the quarter when a dividend is declared, and is amending this report to reflect that change. This change in accounting methodology does not affect any balance sheet item or net earnings. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Amendment No. 3 to Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on the 1st day of August, 2000. TRITON ENERGY LIMITED By:/s/W. Greg Dunlevy ------------------------------------- W. Greg Dunlevy Vice President, Finance Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Amendment No. 3 to Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 1st day of August, 2000. Signatures Title ---------- ----- /s/W. Greg Dunlevy Vice President ----------------------- W. Greg Dunlevy (Principal Financial Officer) /s/Kevin B. Wilcox Controller ---------------------- Kevin B. Wilcox * Chairman of the Board ---------------------- Thomas O. Hicks * President and Chief Executive Officer ---------------------- (Principal Executive Officer) James C. Musselman * Director ---------------------- Sheldon R. Erikson * Director ---------------------- Jack D. Furst * Director ---------------------- Fitzgerald Hudson * Director ---------------------- John R. Huff * Director ---------------------- Michael E. McMahon * Director ---------------------- C. Lamar Norsworthy * Director ---------------------- C. Richard Vermillion * Director ---------------------- J. Otis Winters *By /s/ W. Greg Dunlevy -------------------------- W. Greg Dunlevy, Attorney-in-Fact TRITON ENERGY LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES [Enlarge/Download Table] PAGE ----- TRITON ENERGY LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES: Report of Independent Accountants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-2 Consolidated Statements of Operations - Years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-3 Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 1999 and 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . F-4 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-5 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity - Years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-6 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-7 SCHEDULE: II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts - Years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-52 All other schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes. REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS --------------------------------- To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Triton Energy Limited In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Triton Energy Limited and its subsidiaries at December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Dallas, Texas February 23, 2000 TRITON ENERGY LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) [Enlarge/Download Table] YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, -------------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 --------- ---------- --------- SALES AND OTHER OPERATING REVENUES: Oil and gas sales $247,878 $ 160,881 $145,419 Gain on sale of oil and gas assets --- 67,737 4,077 --------- ---------- --------- 247,878 228,618 149,496 --------- ---------- --------- COSTS AND EXPENSES: Operating 68,130 73,546 51,357 General and administrative 23,636 26,653 28,607 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 61,343 58,811 36,828 Writedown of assets --- 328,630 --- Special charges 2,909 18,324 --- --------- ---------- --------- 156,018 505,964 116,792 --------- ---------- --------- OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) 91,860 (277,346) 32,704 Gain on sale of Triton Pipeline Colombia --- 50,227 --- Interest income 10,579 3,258 5,178 Interest expense, net (22,648) (23,228) (23,858) Other income (expense), net (3,614) 8,480 2,872 --------- ---------- --------- (15,683) 38,737 (15,808) --------- ---------- --------- EARNINGS (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EXTRAORDINARY ITEM 76,177 (238,609) 16,896 Income tax expense (benefit) 28,620 (51,105) 11,301 --------- ---------- --------- EARNINGS (LOSS) BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEM 47,557 (187,504) 5,595 Extraordinary item - extinguishment of debt --- --- (14,491) --------- ---------- --------- NET EARNINGS (LOSS) 47,557 (187,504) (8,896) ACCUMULATED DIVIDENDS ON PREFERENCE SHARES 28,671 3,061 400 --------- ---------- --------- EARNINGS (LOSS) APPLICABLE TO ORDINARY SHARES $ 18,886 $(190,565) $ (9,296) ========= ========== ========= Average ordinary shares outstanding 36,135 36,609 36,471 ========= ========== ========= BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER ORDINARY SHARE: Earnings (loss) before extraordinary item $ 0.52 $ (5.21) $ 0.14 Extraordinary item - extinguishment of debt --- --- (0.40) --------- ---------- --------- BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) $ 0.52 $ (5.21) $ (0.26) ========= ========== ========= DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER ORDINARY SHARE: Earnings (loss) before extraordinary item $ 0.52 $ (5.21) $ 0.14 Extraordinary item - extinguishment of debt --- --- (0.39) --------- ---------- --------- DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) $ 0.52 $ (5.21) $ (0.25) ========= ========== ========= See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. TRITON ENERGY LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) [Enlarge/Download Table] ASSETS DECEMBER 31, --------------------- 1999 1998 ---------- --------- CURRENT ASSETS: Cash and equivalents $ 186,323 $ 18,757 Trade receivables, net 17,246 9,514 Other receivables 23,814 47,756 Deferred income taxes 20,090 --- Inventories, prepaid expenses and other 7,806 1,639 ---------- --------- TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 255,279 77,666 Property and equipment, at cost, net 524,152 470,907 Investment in affiliate 93,188 84,735 Deferred income taxes 88,228 100,916 Other assets 13,628 20,056 ---------- --------- $ 974,475 $754,280 ========== ========= LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES: Current maturities of long-term debt $ 9,027 $ 14,027 Short-term borrowings --- 5,000 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 62,576 44,973 Deferred income and other 22,347 35,254 ---------- --------- TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 93,950 99,254 Long-term debt, excluding current maturities 404,460 413,465 Deferred income taxes 6,677 3,235 Other liabilities 6,336 14,519 SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY: 5% preference shares, par value $.01; authorized 420,000 shares; issued 209,639 shares at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively, stated value $34.41 7,214 7,214 8% preference shares, par value $.01; authorized 11,000,000 shares; issued 5,193,643 and 1,822,500 shares at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively, stated value $70 363,555 127,575 Ordinary shares, par value $.01; authorized 200,000,000 shares; issued 35,763,728 and 36,643,478 shares at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively 358 366 Additional paid-in capital 531,904 575,863 Accumulated deficit (437,528) (485,085) Accumulated other non-owner changes in shareholders' equity (2,451) (2,126) ---------- --------- TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 463,052 223,807 Commitments and contingencies (note 20) --- --- ---------- --------- $ 974,475 $754,280 ========== ========= The Company uses the full cost method to account for its oil- and gas-producing activities. See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. TRITON ENERGY LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (IN THOUSANDS) [Enlarge/Download Table] YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 ---------- ---------- ---------- CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net earnings (loss) $ 47,557 $(187,504) $ (8,896) Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided (used) by operating activities: Depreciation, depletion and amortization 61,343 58,811 36,828 Proceeds from forward oil sale 31,932 1,770 830 Amortization of deferred income (35,254) (35,254) (28,467) Gain on sale of oil and gas assets --- (67,737) (4,077) Gain on sale of Triton Pipeline Colombia --- (50,227) --- Writedown of assets --- 328,630 --- Payment of accreted interest on extinguishment of debt --- --- (124,794) Extraordinary loss on extinguishment of debt, net of tax --- --- 14,491 Amortization of debt discount --- --- 7,949 Deferred income taxes 7,827 (55,592) 8,078 Gain on sale of other assets (677) (7,590) (1,409) Other, net 8,921 3,962 6,100 Changes in working capital: Trade and other receivables (16,131) 6,300 (3,238) Inventories, prepaid expenses and other (3,577) 918 1,794 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 14,581 4,979 (2,605) ---------- ---------- ---------- Net cash provided (used) by operating activities 116,522 1,466 (97,416) ---------- ---------- ---------- CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Capital expenditures and investments (121,483) (180,215) (219,216) Proceeds from sale of oil and gas assets --- 147,027 4,077 Proceeds from sale of Triton Pipeline Colombia --- 97,656 --- Proceeds from sales of other assets 2,353 22,353 1,822 Other 600 (2,630) 617 ---------- ---------- ---------- Net cash provided (used) by investing activities (118,530) 84,191 (212,700) ---------- ---------- ---------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Proceeds from revolving lines of credit and long-term debt --- 162,530 620,413 Payments on revolving lines of credit and long-term debt (19,028) (350,511) (321,515) Short-term notes payable, net --- (9,600) 9,600 Issuance of 8% preference shares, net 217,805 115,329 --- Issuances of ordinary shares 419 2,544 5,260 Repurchase of ordinary shares (11,285) --- --- Dividends paid on preference shares (17,617) (368) (400) Other (151) 5 10 ---------- ---------- ---------- Net cash provided (used) by financing activities 170,143 (80,071) 313,368 ---------- ---------- ---------- Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents (569) (280) (849) ---------- ---------- ---------- Net increase in cash and equivalents 167,566 5,306 2,403 CASH AND EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR 18,757 13,451 11,048 ---------- ---------- ---------- CASH AND EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR $ 186,323 $ 18,757 $ 13,451 ========== ========== ========== See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. TRITON ENERGY LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (IN THOUSANDS) [Enlarge/Download Table] YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------ 1999 1998 1997 -------------------- ---------------------- -------------------- OWNER SOURCES OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY: 5% PREFERENCE SHARES: Balance at beginning of period $ 7,214 $ 7,511 $ 8,515 Conversion of 5% preference shares --- (297) (1,004) ---------- ---------- ---------- Balance at end of period 7,214 7,214 7,511 ---------- ---------- ---------- 8% PREFERENCE SHARES: Balance at beginning of period 127,575 --- --- Issuances of 8% preference shares at $70 per share 222,425 127,575 --- Conversion of 8% preference shares (192) --- --- Stock dividends, 8% preference shares 13,747 --- --- ---------- ---------- ---------- Balance at end of period 363,555 127,575 --- ---------- ---------- ---------- ORDINARY SHARES: Balance at beginning of period 366 365 363 Stock repurchase (9) --- --- Exercise of employee stock options and debentures 1 1 2 ---------- ---------- ---------- Balance at end of period 358 366 365 ---------- ---------- ---------- ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL: Balance at beginning of period 575,863 588,454 582,581 Dividends, 5% preference shares (361) (368) (400) Dividends, 8% preference shares (28,310) (2,693) --- Exercise of employee stock options and debentures 418 2,548 3,831 Conversion of 5% preference shares --- 297 1,004 Conversion of 8% preference shares 192 --- --- Transaction costs for issuance of 8% preference shares (4,620) (12,370) --- Stock repurchase (11,276) --- --- Other, net (2) (5) 1,438 ---------- ---------- ---------- Balance at end of period 531,904 575,863 588,454 ---------- ---------- ---------- TREASURY SHARES: Balance at beginning of period --- (3) (2) Retirement and other, net --- 3 (1) ---------- ---------- ---------- Balance at end of period --- --- (3) ---------- ---------- ---------- TOTAL OWNER SOURCES OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 903,031 711,018 596,327 ---------- ---------- ---------- NON-OWNER SOURCES OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY: ACCUMULATED DEFICIT: Balance at beginning of period (485,085) (297,581) (288,685) Net earnings (loss) 47,557 $47,557 (187,504) $(187,504) (8,896) $(8,896) ---------- ---------- ---------- Balance at end of period (437,528) (485,085) (297,581) ---------- ---------- ---------- ACCUMULATED OTHER NON-OWNER CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY: Balance at beginning of period (2,126) (2,126) (2,128) Valuation reserve on marketable securities --- --- 2 Adjustment for minimum pension liability (325) --- --- -------- ---------- -------- Other non-owner changes in shareholders' equity (325) (325) --- --- 2 2 ---------- -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -------- Non-owner changes in shareholders' equity $47,232 $(187,504) $(8,894) ======== ========== ======== Balance at end of period (2,451) (2,126) (2,126) ---------- ---------- ---------- TOTAL NON-OWNER SOURCES OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (439,979) (487,211) (299,707) ---------- ---------- ---------- TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 463,052 $ 223,807 $ 296,620 ========== ========== ========== See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. TRITON ENERGY LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AMOUNTS IN TABLES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR SHARE, PER SHARE AND PER BARREL DATA) 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES GENERAL Triton Energy Limited ("Triton") is an international oil and gas exploration and production company. The term "Company" when used herein means Triton and its subsidiaries and other affiliates through which the Company conducts its business. The Company's principal properties, operations, and oil and gas reserves are located in Colombia, Malaysia-Thailand and Equatorial Guinea. The Company is exploring for oil and gas in these areas, as well as in southern Europe, Africa, and the Middle East. All sales are currently derived from oil and gas production in Colombia. Triton, a Cayman Islands company, was incorporated in 1995 to become the parent holding company of Triton Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("TEC"). On March 25, 1996, the stockholders of TEC approved the merger of a wholly owned subsidiary of Triton with and into TEC (the "Reorganization"). Pursuant to the Reorganization, Triton became the parent holding company of TEC and each share of common stock, par value $1.00, and 5% preferred stock of TEC outstanding on March 25, 1996, was converted into one Triton ordinary share, par value $.01, and one 5% Triton preference share, respectively. The Reorganization has been accounted for as a combination of entities under common control. PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Triton and its majority-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Investments in 20%- to 50%-owned affiliates which the Company exercises significant influence over operating and financial policies are accounted for using the equity method. Investments in less than 20%-owned affiliates are accounted for using the cost method. CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash equivalents are highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less. INVENTORIES Inventories consist principally of oil produced but not sold, stated at market value, and materials and supplies, stated at the lower of cost or market. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT The Company follows the full cost method of accounting for exploration and development of oil and gas reserves, whereby all acquisition, exploration and development costs are capitalized. Individual countries are designated as separate cost centers. All capitalized costs plus the undiscounted estimated future development costs of proved reserves are depleted using the unit-of-production method based on total proved reserves applicable to each country. A gain or loss is recognized on sales of oil and gas properties only when the sale involves significant reserves. Costs related to acquisition, holding and initial exploration of licenses in countries with no proved reserves are initially capitalized, including internal costs directly identified with acquisition, exploration and development activities. Costs related to production, general overhead or similar activities are expensed. The Company's exploration licenses are periodically assessed for impairment on a country-by-country basis. If the Company's investment in exploration licenses within a country where no proved reserves are assigned is deemed to be impaired, the licenses are written down to estimated recoverable value. If the Company abandons all exploration efforts in a country where no proved reserves are assigned, all acquisition and exploration costs associated with the country are expensed. Due to the unpredictable nature of exploration drilling activities, the amount and timing of impairment expense are difficult to predict with any certainty. The net capitalized costs of oil and gas properties for each cost center, less related deferred income taxes, cannot exceed the sum of (i) the estimated future net revenues from the properties, discounted at 10%; (ii) unevaluated costs not being amortized; and (iii) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproved properties being amortized; less (iv) income tax effects related to differences between the financial statement basis and tax basis of oil and gas properties. The estimated costs, net of salvage value, of dismantling facilities or projects with limited lives or facilities that are required to be dismantled by contract, regulation or law, and the estimated costs of restoration and reclamation associated with oil and gas operations are included in estimated future development costs as part of the amortizable base. Support equipment and facilities are depreciated using the unit-of-production method based on total reserves of the field related to the support equipment and facilities. Other property and equipment, which includes furniture and fixtures, vehicles and leasehold improvements, are depreciated principally on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 20 years. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred, and renewals and improvements are capitalized. ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS Environmental costs are expensed or capitalized depending on their future economic benefit. Costs that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations and have no future economic benefit are expensed. Liabilities for future expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when future environmental expenditures and/or remediation is deemed probable, and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation obligations are not discounted to their present value. INCOME TAXES Deferred tax liabilities or assets are recognized for the anticipated future tax effects of temporary differences between the financial statement basis and the tax basis of the Company's assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates in effect at year end. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is recorded when it is more likely than not that the benefit from the deferred tax asset will not be realized. REVENUE RECOGNITION Cost reimbursements arising from carried interests granted by the Company are revenues to the extent the reimbursements are contingent upon and derived from production. Obligations arising from net profit interest conveyances are recorded as operating expenses when the obligation is incurred. FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION The U.S. dollar is the designated functional currency for all of the Company's foreign operations. The cumulative translation adjustment represents the cumulative effect of translating the balance sheet accounts of Triton Colombia, Inc. from the functional currency into U.S. dollars during the period when the Colombian peso was the functional currency. RISK MANAGEMENT Oil and natural gas sold by the Company are normally priced with reference to a defined benchmark, such as light, sweet crude oil traded on the New York Merchantile Exchange (West Texas Intermediate or "WTI"). Actual prices received vary from the benchmark depending on quality and location differentials. From time to time, it is the Company's policy to use financial market transactions, including swaps, collars and options, with creditworthy counterparties, primarily to reduce risk associated with the pricing of a portion of the oil and natural gas that it sells. The Company does not enter into financial market transactions for trading purposes. Gains or losses on financial market transactions that qualify for hedge accounting are recognized in oil and gas sales at the time of settlement of the underlying hedged transactions. Premiums paid for financial market contracts are capitalized and amortized as operating expenses over the contract period. Changes in the fair market value of financial market transactions that do not qualify for hedge accounting are reflected as noncash adjustments to other income (expense), net in the period the change occurs. Realized gains or losses on financial market transactions that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recorded in oil and gas sales. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 ("SFAS 123"), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," encourages, but does not require, the adoption of a fair value-based method of accounting for employee stock-based compensation transactions. The Company has elected to apply the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 ("Opinion 25"), "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related interpretations, in accounting for its stock-based compensation plans. Under Opinion 25, compensation cost is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the Company's stock at the date of the grant above the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. EARNINGS PER ORDINARY SHARE Basic earnings (loss) per ordinary share amounts were computed by dividing net earnings (loss) after deduction of dividends on preference shares by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per ordinary share assumes the conversion of all securities that are exercisable or convertible into ordinary shares that would dilute the basic earnings per ordinary share during the period. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income," established standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components, specifically net income and all other changes in shareholders' equity except those resulting from investments by and distributions to shareholders. The Company, which adopted the standard beginning January 1, 1998, has elected to display comprehensive income (or non-owner changes in shareholders' equity) in the Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 133 ("SFAS 133"), "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and for hedging activities. It requires enterprises to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. The requisite accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative will depend on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. The Company must adopt SFAS 133 effective January 1, 2001. Based on the Company's outstanding derivatives contracts, the Company believes that the impact of adopting this standard would not have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations or consolidated financial condition. However, no assurances can be given with regard to the level of the Company's derivatives activities at the time SFAS 133 is adopted or the resulting effect on the Company's operations or consolidated financial condition. THE USE OF ESTIMATES IN PREPARING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. RECLASSIFICATIONS Certain previously reported financial information has been reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation. 2. ASSET DISPOSITIONS In December 1998, the Company sold its Bangladesh subsidiary for cash proceeds of $4.5 million and recognized a gain of $4.5 million in gain on sale of oil and gas assets. In July 1998, the Company and Atlantic Richfield Company ("ARCO") signed an agreement providing financing for the development of the Company's gas reserves on Block A-18 of the Malaysia-Thailand Joint Development Area. Under terms of the agreement, consummated in August 1998, the Company sold to a subsidiary of ARCO for $150 million one-half of the shares of the subsidiary through which the Company owned its 50% share of Block A-18. The Company received net proceeds of $142 million and recorded a gain of $63.2 million in gain on the sale of oil and gas assets. After the sale, which resulted in a 50% ownership in the previously wholly owned subsidiary, the Company's remaining ownership is accounted for using the equity method. This investment in Block A-18 is presented in investment in affiliate at December 31, 1999 and 1998. The agreements also require ARCO to pay the future exploration and development costs attributable to the Company's and ARCO's collective interest in Block A-18, up to $377 million or until first production from a gas field, after which the Company and ARCO would each pay 50% of such costs. There can be no assurance that the Company's and ARCO's collective share of the cost of developing the project will not exceed $377 million. Additionally, the agreements require ARCO to pay the Company an additional $65 million each at July 1, 2002, and July 1, 2005, if certain specific development objectives are met by such dates, or $40 million each if the objectives are met within one year thereafter. There can be no assurance that the Company will receive any incentive payments. The agreements provide that the Company will recover its investment in recoverable costs in the project, approximately $100 million, and that ARCO will recover its investment in recoverable costs, on a first-in, first-out basis from the cost-recovery portion of future production. In February 1998, the Company sold Triton Pipeline Colombia, Inc. ("TPC"), a wholly owned subsidiary that held the Company's 9.6% equity interest in the Colombian pipeline company, Oleoducto Central S.A. ("OCENSA"), to an unrelated third party (the "Purchaser") for $100 million. Net proceeds were approximately $97.7 million. The sale resulted in a gain of $50.2 million. In conjunction with the sale of TPC, the Company entered into an equity swap with a creditworthy financial institution (the "Counterparty"). The equity swap has a notional amount of $97 million and requires the Company to make quarterly floating LIBOR-based payments on the notional amount to the Counterparty. In exchange, the Counterparty is required to make payments to the Company equivalent to 97% of the dividends TPC receives in respect of its equity interest in OCENSA. The equity swap is carried in the Company's financial statements at fair value during its term, which, as amended, will expire April 14, 2000. The value of the equity swap in the Company's financial statements is equal to 97% of the estimated fair value of the shares of OCENSA owned by TPC. Because there is no public market for the shares of OCENSA, the Company estimates their value using a discounted cash flow model applied to the distributions expected to be paid in respect of the OCENSA shares. The discount rate applied to the estimated cash flows from the OCENSA shares is based on a combination of current market rates of interest, a credit spread for OCENSA's debt, and a spread to reflect the preferred stock nature of the OCENSA shares. During the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, the Company recorded an expense of $6.9 million and $3.3 million, respectively, in other income (expense), net, related to the net payments made under the equity swap and its change in fair value. Net payments made (or received) under the equity swap, and any fluctuations in the fair value of the equity swap, in future periods, will affect other income in such periods. There can be no assurance that changes in interest rates, or in other factors that affect the value of the OCENSA shares and/or the equity swap, will not have a material adverse effect on the carrying value of the equity swap. Upon the expiration of the equity swap in April 2000, the Company expects that the Purchaser will sell the TPC shares. Under the terms of the equity swap with the Counterparty, upon any sale by the Purchaser of the TPC shares, the Company will receive from the Counterparty, or pay to the Counterparty, an amount equal to the excess or deficiency, as applicable, of the difference between 97% of the net proceeds from the Purchaser's sale of the TPC shares and the notional amount of $97 million. For example, if the Purchaser sold the TPC shares for an amount equal to the value the Company has estimated for purposes of preparing its balance sheet as of December 31, 1999, the Company would have to make a payment to the Counterparty under the equity swap of approximately $8.4 million. There can be no assurance that the value the Purchaser may realize in any sale of the TPC shares will equal the value of the shares estimated by the Company for purposes of valuing the equity swap. The Company has no right or obligation to repurchase the TPC shares at any time, but the Company is not prohibited from offering to purchase the shares if the Purchaser offers to sell them. In June 1997, the Company sold its Argentine subsidiary for cash proceeds of $4.1 million and recognized a gain of $4.1 million in gain on sale of oil and gas assets. 3. WRITEDOWN OF ASSETS Writedown of assets in 1998 is summarized as follows: [Download Table] YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 ----------- Evaluated oil and gas properties (SEC ceiling test) $ 241,005 Unevaluated oil and gas properties 73,890 Other assets 13,735 ----------- $ 328,630 =========== In June and December 1998, the carrying amount of the Company's evaluated oil and gas properties in Colombia was written down by $105.4 million ($68.5 million, net of tax) and $135.6 million ($115.9 million, net of tax), respectively, through application of the full cost ceiling limitation as prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), principally as a result of a decline in oil prices. No adjustments were made to the Company's reserves in Colombia as a result of the decline in prices. The SEC ceiling test was calculated using the June 30, and December 31, 1998, WTI oil prices of $14.18 per barrel and $12.05 per barrel, respectively, that, after a differential for Cusiana crude delivered at the port of Covenas in Colombia, resulted in a net price of approximately $13 per barrel and $11 per barrel, respectively. In conjunction with the plan to restructure operations and scale back exploration-related expenditures, the Company assessed its investments in exploration licenses and determined that certain investments were impaired. As a result, unevaluated oil and gas properties and other assets totaling $77.3 million ($72.6 million, net of tax) were expensed in June 1998. The writedown included $27.2 million and $22.5 million related to exploration activity in Guatemala and China, respectively. The remaining writedowns related to the Company's exploration projects in certain other areas of the world. During 1998, the Company evaluated the recoverability of its approximate 6.6% investment in a Colombian pipeline company, Oleoducto de Colombia S.A. ("ODC"), which is accounted for under the cost method. Based on an analysis of the future cash flows expected to be received from ODC, the Company expensed the carrying value of its investment totaling $10.3 million. 4. SPECIAL CHARGES In September 1999, the Company recognized special charges totaling $2.4 million related to the transfer of its working interest in Ecuador to a third party. In July 1998, the Company commenced a plan to restructure the Company's operations, reduce overhead costs and substantially scale back exploration-related expenditures. The plan contemplated the closing of foreign offices in four countries, the elimination of approximately 105 positions, or 41% of the worldwide workforce, and the relinquishment or other disposal of several exploration licenses. As a result of the restructuring, the Company recognized special charges of $15 million during the third quarter of 1998 and $3.3 million during the fourth quarter of 1998 for a total of $18.3 million. Of the $18.3 million in special charges, $14.5 million related to the reduction in workforce, and represented the estimated costs for severance, benefit continuation and outplacement costs, which will be paid over a period of up to two years according to the severance formula. Since July 1998, the Company has paid $13.1 million in severance, benefit continuation and outplacement costs. A total of $2.1 million of special charges related to the closing of foreign offices, and represented the estimated costs of terminating office leases and the write-off of related assets. The remaining special charges of $1.7 million primarily related to the write-off of other surplus fixed assets resulting from the reduction in workforce. At December 31, 1999, all of the positions had been eliminated, all designated foreign offices had closed and all licenses had been relinquished, sold or their commitments renegotiated. During the fourth quarter of 1999, the Company reversed $.7 million of the accrual associated with the completion of restructuring activities. The remaining liability related to the restructuring activities undertaken in 1998 was $1 million at December 31, 1999. In March 1999, the Company accrued special charges of $1.2 million related to an additional 15% reduction in the number of employees resulting from the Company's continuing efforts to reduce costs. The special charges consisted of $1 million for severance, benefit continuation and outplacement costs and $.2 million related to the write-off of surplus fixed assets. Since March 1999, the Company has paid $.9 million in severance, benefit continuation and outplacement costs. At December 31, 1999, the remaining liability related to the restructuring activities undertaken in 1999 was $.1 million. 5. OTHER RECEIVABLES Other receivables consisted of the following: [Download Table] DECEMBER 31, ---------------- 1999 1998 ------- ------- Receivables from and advances to partners and others $10,684 $ 2,007 Receivable from financial market transactions 4,861 180 Receivable from insurance 2,300 7,800 Receivable from the forward oil sale 1,081 31,932 Other 4,888 5,837 ------- ------- $23,814 $47,756 ======= =======
10-K/A2nd “Page” of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 2nd
6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment, at cost, are summarized as follows: [Download Table] DECEMBER 31, ------------------ 1999 1998 -------- -------- Oil and gas properties, full cost method: Evaluated $560,240 $543,514 Unevaluated 78,527 70,836 Support equipment and facilities 303,953 289,659 Other 17,535 18,790 -------- -------- 960,255 922,799 Less accumulated depreciation and depletion 436,103 451,892 -------- -------- $524,152 $470,907 ======== ======== The Company capitalized general and administrative expenses related to exploration and development activities of $6.9 million, $20.6 million and $32.4 million in the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. 7. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are summarized as follows: [Download Table] DECEMBER 31, ---------------- 1999 1998 ------- ------- Colombian income taxes $14,471 $ --- Accrued exploration and development 9,762 3,774 Equity swap 8,435 --- Accrued interest payable 7,864 8,160 Taxes other than income 7,713 2,970 Litigation and environmental matters 3,872 2,064 Accrued special charges 1,246 7,869 Accounts payable, principally trade 1,242 9,136 Dividends payable --- 2,693 Other 7,971 8,307 ------- ------- $62,576 $44,973 ======= ======= 8. DEFERRED INCOME AND OTHER In May 1995, the Company sold 10.4 million barrels of oil from the Cusiana and Cupiagua fields in Colombia in a forward oil sale. Under the terms of the sale, the Company received approximately $87 million of the approximately $124 million net proceeds. In 1999, the Company received substantially all of the remaining proceeds totaling approximately $31.9 million. The Company has recorded the net proceeds as deferred income and recognizes such revenue when the barrels of oil are delivered during the five-year period that began in June 1995. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company must deliver to the buyer 58,425 barrels per month through March 1997 and 254,136 barrels per month from April 1997 to March 2000. At December 31, 1999 and 1998, $8.8 million and $35.3 million, respectively, were recorded as deferred income and included in current liabilities. During 1999, the Company acquired the Colombian entity of its former partner in the El Pinal field. In addition to the working interest in the El Pinal field, the acquired entity has tax basis and net operating loss carryforwards ("NOLs") totaling approximately $40 million, which the Company expects to utilize in 2000. At December 31, 1999, the tax affected amount of the tax basis and NOLs ($14.2 million) was included in current assets as a deferred tax asset. In addition, the Company recorded deferred income of $10.6 million, representing the difference between the value of the deferred tax asset and the purchase price. During 2000, the deferred tax asset and the deferred income will be reduced as the tax basis and NOLs are utilized. 9. DEBT A summary of long-term debt follows: [Download Table] DECEMBER 31, ------------------ 1999 1998 -------- -------- Senior Notes due 2005 $200,000 $200,000 Senior Notes due 2002 199,947 199,924 Term credit facility maturing 2001 13,540 22,568 Revolving credit facility maturing 1999 --- 5,000 -------- -------- 413,487 427,492 Less current maturities 9,027 14,027 -------- -------- $404,460 $413,465 ======== ======== In April 1997, the Company issued $400 million aggregate face value of senior indebtedness to refinance other indebtedness. The senior indebtedness consisted of $200 million face amount of 8 3/4% Senior Notes due April 15, 2002 (the "2002 Notes"), at 99.942% of the principal amount (resulting in $199.9 million aggregate net proceeds) and $200 million face amount of 9 1/4% Senior Notes dueApril 15, 2005 (the "2005 Notes" and, together with the 2002 Notes, the "SeniorNotes"), at 100% of the principal amount, for total aggregate net proceeds of$399.9 million before deducting transaction costs of approximately $1 million. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15. The Senior Notes are redeemable at any time at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, and contain certain covenants limiting the incurrence of certain liens, sale/leaseback transactions, and mergers and consolidations. In November 1995, a subsidiary signed an unsecured term credit facility with a bank supported by a guarantee issued by the Export-Import Bank of the United States ("EXIM") for $45 million, which matures in January 2001. Principal and interest payments are due semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 and borrowings bear interest at LIBOR plus .25%, adjusted on a semi-annual basis. At December 31, 1999, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $13.5 million under the facility. In February 2000, the Company entered into an unsecured two-year revolving credit facility with a group of banks, which matures in February 2002. The credit facility gives the Company the right to borrow from time to time up to the amount of the borrowing base determined by the banks, not to exceed $150 million. As of February 2000, the borrowing base was $150 million. The credit facility contains various restrictive covenants, including covenants that require the Company to maintain a ratio of earnings before interest, depreciation, depletion, amortization and income taxes to net interest expense of at least 2.5 to 1, and that prohibit the Company from permitting net debt to exceed the product of 3.75 times the Company's earnings before interest, depreciation, depletion, amortization and income taxes, in each case, on a trailing four quarters basis. The Company capitalizes interest on qualifying assets, principally unevaluated oil and gas properties, major development projects in progress and investments accounted for by the equity method while the investee has activities in progress necessary to commence its principle operations. Capitalized interest amounted to $14.5 million, $23.2 million and $25.8 million in the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. The Company amortizes debt issue costs over the life of the borrowing using the interest method. Amortization related to the Company's debt issue costs was $.5 million, $2.9 million and $2 million in the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. The aggregate maturities of long-term debt for the five years during the period ending December 31, 2004, are as follows: 2000 -- $9 million; 2001 -- $4.5 million; 2002 -- $199.9 million; 2003 -- nil; and 2004 -- nil.
10-K/A3rd “Page” of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 3rd
10. INCOME TAXES The components of earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and extraordinary item were as follows: [Download Table] YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, -------------------------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 --------- ---------- --------- Cayman Islands $(35,907) $ 82,995 $(12,969) United States (7,810) (24,003) (31,694) Foreign - other 119,894 (297,601) 61,559 --------- ---------- --------- $ 76,177 $(238,609) $ 16,896 ========= ========== ========= Pursuant to the Reorganization in March 1996, Triton, a Cayman Islands company, became the parent holding company of TEC, a Delaware corporation. As a result, the Company's corporate domicile became the Cayman Islands. The components of the provision for income taxes on continuing operations were as follows: [Download Table] YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 -------- --------- -------- Current: Cayman Islands $ --- $ --- $ --- United States --- --- (7) Foreign - other 20,793 4,487 3,230 -------- --------- -------- Total current 20,793 4,487 3,223 -------- --------- -------- Deferred: Cayman Islands --- --- --- United States (1,410) 1,457 (7,929) Foreign - other 9,237 (57,049) 16,007 -------- --------- -------- Total deferred 7,827 (55,592) 8,078 -------- --------- -------- Total $28,620 $(51,105) $11,301 ======== ========= ========
10-K/A4th “Page” of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 4th
A reconciliation of the differences between the Company's applicable statutory tax rate and the Company's effective income tax rate follows: [Download Table] YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 ------- ------- --------- Tax provision at statutory tax rate 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Increase (decrease) resulting from: Net change in valuation allowance (15.7)% 3.9 % 263.0 % Foreign items without tax benefit 18.9 % (34.9)% 77.8 % Income subject to tax in excess of statutory rate 36.6 % 32.6 % 36.9 % Current year change in NOL/credit carryforwards (7.6)% (4.8)% (356.7)% Temporary differences: Oil and gas basis adjustments 3.3 % 25.7 % 32.5 % Reimbursement of pre-commerciality costs 2.3 % (1.1)% 13.2 % Other (0.2)% --- % 0.2 % ------- ------- -------- 37.6 % 21.4 % 66.9 % ======= ======= ========= The components of the net deferred tax asset and liability were as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] DECEMBER 31, 1999 DECEMBER 31, 1998 ------------------------------ ------------------------------- OTHER OTHER U.S. COLOMBIA FOREIGN U.S. COLOMBIA FOREIGN --------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Deferred tax asset: Net operating loss carryforwards $157,558 $20,090 $ 9,832 $145,475 $ 7,992 $ 7,219 Depreciable/depletable property 1,748 8,778 --- 1,252 27,730 --- Credit carryforwards 2,048 --- --- 1,731 6,813 --- Reserves 819 --- --- 2,502 --- --- Other 176 --- --- 1,505 --- --- --------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Gross deferred tax asset 162,349 28,868 9,832 152,465 42,535 7,219 Valuation allowances (72,908) (8,778) --- (65,881) (27,730) --- --------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Net deferred tax asset 89,441 20,090 9,832 86,584 14,805 7,219 --------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Deferred tax liability: Depreciable/depletable property --- --- (16,509) --- --- (10,454) Other (1,213) --- --- (473) --- --- --------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Net deferred tax asset (liability) 88,228 20,090 (6,677) 86,111 14,805 (3,235) Less current deferred tax asset (liability) --- 20,090 --- --- --- --- --------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Noncurrent deferred tax asset (liability) $ 88,228 $ --- $ (6,677) $ 86,111 $ 14,805 $ (3,235) ========= ======== ========= ========= ========= ========= At December 31, 1999, the Company had NOLs and depletion carryforwards for U.S. tax purposes of $450.2 million and $20.3 million, respectively. The U.S. NOLs expire from 2000 through 2020 as follows: [Download Table] NOLS EXPIRING BY YEAR --------- May 2000 $ 19,571 May 2001 30,389 May 2002 22,702 May 2003 20,566 May 2004 8,263 May 2005 - May 2020 348,675 --------- $ 450,166 ========= At December 31, 1999, the Company's Colombian operations and other foreign operations had NOLs and other credit carryforwards totaling $57.4 million and $40.7 million, respectively. The NOLs expire from 2001 through 2004. The deferred tax valuation allowance of $81.7 million at December 31, 1999, is primarily attributable to management's assessment of the utilization of NOLs in the U.S., the expectation that other tax credits will expire without being utilized, and certain temporary differences will reverse without a benefit to the Company. The minimum amount of future taxable income necessary to realize the deferred tax asset is approximately $252 million and $57 million in the U.S. and Colombia, respectively. Although there can be no assurance the Company will achieve such levels of income, management believes the deferred tax asset will be realized through income from its operations. If certain changes in the Company's ownership should occur, there would be an annual limitation on the amount of U.S. NOLs that can be utilized. To the extent a change in ownership does occur, the limitation is not expected to materially impact the utilization of such carryforwards. 11. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PENSION PLANS The Company has a defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all employees in the United States. The benefits are based on years of service and the employee's final average monthly compensation. Contributions are intended to provide for benefits attributed to past and future services. The Company also has a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan ("SERP") that is unfunded and provides supplemental pension benefits to a select group of management and key employees. The funding status of the plans follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------------- 1999 1998 ------------------- ------------------- DEFINED DEFINED BENEFIT SERP BENEFIT SERP PLAN PLAN PLAN PLAN --------- -------- --------- -------- Change in benefit obligation: Benefit obligation at beginning of year $ 6,435 $ 6,579 $ 6,008 $ 6,621 Service cost 392 537 560 799 Interest cost 421 435 438 607 Amendments --- --- --- 434 Actuarial loss/(gain) (750) 1,465 472 913 Benefits paid (531) (1,385) (377) (1,617) Curtailment gain --- --- (666) (1,178) --------- -------- --------- -------- Benefit obligation at end of year 5,967 7,631 6,435 6,579 --------- -------- --------- -------- Change in plan assets: Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year 7,068 --- 5,531 --- Actual return on plan assets 1,971 --- 1,446 --- Company contribution 480 1,385 468 1,617 Benefits paid (531) (1,385) (377) (1,617) --------- -------- --------- -------- Fair value of plan assets at end of year 8,988 --- 7,068 --- --------- -------- --------- -------- Reconciliation: Funded status 3,021 (7,631) 633 (6,579) Unrecognized actuarial (gain)/loss (2,999) 1,945 (908) 480 Unrecognized transition (asset)/obligation (6) 527 (8) 695 Unrecognized prior service cost 317 226 373 253 --------- -------- --------- -------- Prepaid/(accrued) pension cost 333 (4,933) 90 (5,151) --------- -------- --------- -------- Adjustment for minimum liability --- (1,255) --- --- --------- -------- --------- -------- Adjusted prepaid/(accrued) pension cost $ 333 $(6,188) $ 90 $(5,151) ========= ======== ========= ======== The adjustment required to recognize the minimum liability for the SERP plan at December 31, 1999, resulted in the recognition of $.8 million as an intangible asset and $.5 million ($.3 million, net of tax) as a charge to accumulated other non-owner changes in shareholder's equity.
10-K/A5th “Page” of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 5th
A summary of the components of pension expense follows: [Download Table] YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 ------- ------- ------- Components of net periodic pension cost: Service cost $ 929 $1,359 $ 832 Interest cost 856 1,045 783 Expected return on plan assets (618) (481) (416) Recognized net actuarial loss/(gain) (12) --- --- Amortization of transition obligation 166 591 166 Amortization of prior service cost 83 538 67 ------- ------- ------- Net periodic pension cost $1,404 $3,052 $1,432 ======= ======= ======= The projected benefit obligations at December 31, 1999 and 1998, assume a discount rate of 7.75% and 6.75%, respectively, and a rate of increase in compensation expense of 5%. The expected long-term rate of return on assets is 9% for the defined benefit plan. During 1998, work-force reductions resulted in the recognition of additional prior service cost of $.2 million each for the defined benefit plan and the SERP plan and additional transition obligation of $.4 million for the SERP plan. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN Effective January 1, 1994, the Company amended and restated the employee stock ownership plan to form a 401(k) plan (the "Plan"). The Company recognizes expense based on actual amounts contributed to the Plan. The cost recognized for the Plan was $.2 million, $.6 million and $.6 million for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. 12. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 5% CONVERTIBLE PREFERENCE SHARES In connection with the acquisition of the minority interest in Triton Europe in 1994, the Company designated a series of 550,000 preferred shares (522,460 shares issued) as 5% Preferred Stock, no par value, with a stated value of $34.41 per share. Pursuant to the Reorganization, Triton converted each share of 5% Preferred Stock into one 5% Convertible Preference Share, par value $.01. Each share of the Company's 5% Convertible Preference Shares is convertible into one Triton ordinary share and bears a cash dividend, which has priority over dividends on Triton's ordinary shares, equal to 5% per annum on the redemption price of $34.41 per share, payable semi-annually on March 30 and September 30 of each year. The 5% Convertible Preference Shares have priority over Triton ordinary shares upon liquidation, and may be redeemed at Triton's option at any time on or after March 30, 1998, for cash equal to the redemption price. Any shares that remain outstanding on March 30, 2004, must be redeemed at the redemption price, either for cash or, at the Company's option, for Triton ordinary shares. At December 31, 1999 and 1998, there were 209,639 5% Convertible Preference Shares outstanding and at December 31, 1997, there were 218,285 shares outstanding. 8% CONVERTIBLE PREFERENCE SHARES In August 1998, the Company and HM4 Triton, L.P., an affiliate of Hicks, Muse, Tate & Furst Incorporated ("Hicks Muse"), entered into a stock purchase agreement (the "Stock Purchase Agreement") that provided for a $350 million equity investment in the Company. The investment was effected in two stages. At the closing of the first stage in September 1998 (the "First Closing"), the Company issued to HM4 Triton, L.P. 1,822,500 shares of 8% Convertible Preference Shares for $70 per share (for proceeds of $116.8 million, net of transaction costs). Pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, the second stage was effected through a rights offering for 3,177,500 shares of 8% Convertible Preference Shares at $70 per share, with HM4 Triton, L.P. being obligated to purchase any shares not subscribed. At the closing of the second stage, which occurred on January 4, 1999 (the "Second Closing"), the Company issued an additional 3,177,500 8% Convertible Preference Shares for proceeds totaling $217.8 million, net of closing costs (of which, HM4 Triton, L.P. purchased 3,114,863 shares). Each 8% Convertible Preference Share is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into four ordinary shares of the Company (subject to certain antidilution protections). Holders of 8% Convertible Preference Shares are entitled to receive, when and if declared by the Board of Directors, cumulative dividends at a rate per annum equal to 8% of the liquidation preference of $70 per share, payable for each semi-annual period ending June 30 and December 30 of each year. At the Company's option, dividends may be paid in cash or by the issuance of additional whole shares of 8% Convertible Preference Shares. If a dividend is to be paid in additional shares, the number of additional shares to be issued in payment of the dividend will be determined by dividing the amount of the dividend by $70, with amounts in respect of any fractional shares to be paid in cash. The first dividend period was the period from January 4, 1999, to June 30, 1999. The Company's Board of Directors elected to pay the dividend for that period in additional shares resulting in the issuance of 196,388 8% Convertible Preference Shares. The dividend for the period July 1, 1999 to December 31, 1999 was paid in cash. The declaration of a dividend in cash or additional shares for any period should not be considered an indication as to whether the Board will declare dividends in cash or additional shares in future periods. Holders of 8% Convertible Preference Shares are entitled to vote with the holders of ordinary shares on all matters submitted to the shareholders of the Company for a vote, with each 8% Convertible Preference Share entitling its holder to a number of votes equal to the number of ordinary shares into which it could be converted at that time. At December 31, 1999 and 1998, 5,193,643 and 1,822,500 8% Convertible Preference Shares were outstanding, respectively.
10-K/A6th “Page” of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 6th
ORDINARY SHARES Changes in issued ordinary shares were as follows: [Download Table] YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------ 1999 1998 1997 ----------- ----------- ---------- Balance at beginning of year 36,643,478 36,541,064 36,342,181 Share repurchase (948,300) --- --- Issuances under stock plans 49,367 46,648 35,961 Conversion of 8% preference shares 10,980 --- --- Exercise of employee stock options 8,213 47,238 83,736 Conversion of 5% preference shares --- 8,646 29,184 Other, net (10) (118) 50,002 ----------- ----------- ---------- Balance at end of year 35,763,728 36,643,478 36,541,064 =========== =========== ========== Changes in ordinary shares held in treasury were as follows: [Download Table] YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------- 1998 1997 ------ ------ Balance at beginning of year 73 40 Purchase of treasury shares 64 33 Retirement of treasury shares (137) --- ----- ------ Balance at end of year --- 73 ====== ====== SHARE REPURCHASE In April 1999, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program enabling the Company to repurchase up to ten percent of the Company's then outstanding 36.7 million ordinary shares. Purchases of ordinary shares by the Company began in April and may be made from time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions at prevailing market prices depending on market conditions. The Company has no obligation to repurchase any of its outstanding shares and may discontinue the share repurchase program at management's discretion. As of December 31, 1999, the Company had purchased 948,300 ordinary shares for $11.3 million. The Company canceled and returned the repurchased ordinary shares to the status of authorized but unissued shares. The Company's revolving credit facility entered into in February 2000, generally does not permit the Company to repurchase its ordinary shares without the bank's consent.
10-K/A7th “Page” of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 7th
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN The Company has adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan pursuant to which preference share rights attach to all ordinary shares at the rate of one right for each ordinary share. Each right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company one one-thousandth of a Series A Junior Participating Preference Share, par value $.01 per share ("Junior Preference Shares"), of the Company at a price of $120 per one one-thousandth of a share of such Junior Preference Shares, subject to adjustment. Generally, the rights only become distributable 10 days following public announcement that a person has acquired beneficial ownership of 15% or more of Triton's ordinary shares or 10 business days following commencement of a tender offer or exchange offer for 15% or more of the outstanding ordinary shares; provided that, pursuant to the terms of the plan, any acquisition of Triton shares by HM4 Triton, L.P. or its affiliates, including Hicks, Muse, Tate & Furst Incorporated, will not result in the distribution of rights unless and until HM4 Triton, L.P.'s ownership of Triton shares is reduced below certain levels. If, among other events, any person becomes the beneficial owner of 15% or more of Triton's ordinary shares (except as provided with respect to HM4 Triton, L.P.), each right not owned by such person generally becomes the right to purchase a number of ordinary shares of the Company equal to the number obtained by dividing the right's exercise price (currently $120) by 50% of the market price of the ordinary shares on the date of the first occurrence. In addition, if the Company is subsequently merged or certain other extraordinary business transactions are consummated, each right generally becomes a right to purchase a number of shares of common stock of the acquiring person equal to the number obtained by dividing the right's exercise price by 50% of the market price of the common stock on the date of the first occurrence. Under certain circumstances, the Company's directors may determine that a tender offer or merger is fair to all shareholders and prevent the rights from being exercised. At any time after a person or group acquires 15% or more of the ordinary shares outstanding (other than with respect to HM4 Triton, L.P.) and prior to the acquisition by such person or group of 50% or more of the outstanding ordinary shares or the occurrence of an event described in the prior paragraph, the Board of Directors of the Company may exchange the rights (other than rights owned by such person or group which will become void), in whole or in part, at an exchange ratio of one ordinary share, or one one-thousandth of a Junior Preference Share, per right (subject to adjustment). The Company has the ability to amend the rights (except the redemption price) in any manner prior to the public announcement that a 15% position has been acquired or a tender offer has been commenced. The Company will be entitled to redeem the rights at $0.01 a right at any time prior to the time that a 15% position has been acquired. The rights will expire on May 22, 2005, unless earlier redeemed by the Company.
10-K/A8th “Page” of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 8th
13. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS STOCK OPTION PLANS Options to purchase ordinary shares of the Company may be granted to officers and employees under various stock option plans. The exercise price of each option is equal to or greater than the market price of the Company's ordinary shares on the date of grant. Grants generally become exercisable in 25% or 33% cumulative annual increments beginning one year from the date of issuance and generally expire during a period from 5 to 10 years after the date of grant, depending on terms of the grant. In addition, each non-employee director receives an option to purchase 15,000 shares each year. These grants become exercisable at the date of the grant and expire at the end of 10 years. At December 31, 1999 and 1998, shares available for grant were 1,019,021 and 2,521,133, respectively. A summary of the status of the Company's stock option plans is presented below: [Enlarge/Download Table] DECEMBER 31, 1999 DECEMBER 31, 1998 DECEMBER 31, 1997 -------------------- --------------------- ------------------- WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE EXERCISE EXERCISE EXERCISE SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE ----------- ------- ------------ ------- ---------- ------- Outstanding at beginning of year 4,057,207 $26.51 4,449,435 $39.05 3,854,046 $38.81 Granted 2,150,000 14.03 2,894,603 20.56 744,250 39.99 Exercised (8,213) 10.57 (47,238) 29.30 (83,736) 30.76 Canceled (351,138) 29.24 (3,239,593) 38.39 (65,125) 46.09 ----------- ------------ ----------- Outstanding at end of year 5,847,856 21.78 4,057,207 26.51 4,449,435 39.05 =========== ============ =========== Options exercisable at year-end 3,121,601 2,804,584 2,728,254 Weighted average fair value of options: Granted at market prices $ 2.71 $ 6.12 $ 16.37 Granted at greater than market prices 4.93 2.84 --- On December 2, 1998, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of new stock options totaling 440,103 shares with an exercise price of $14.50 to substantially all of its employees. Each participating employee was granted options in an amount equal to one-half of any options then held by the employees with an exercise price greater than $30.00 per share and the options with an exercise price greater than $30.00 per share expired.
10-K/A9th “Page” of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 9th
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 1999: [Download Table] OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE -------------------------------------- ------------------------- WEIGHTED RANGE AVERAGE WEIGHTED WEIGHTED OF NUMBER REMAINING AVERAGE NUMBER AVERAGE EXERCISE OUTSTANDING AT CONTRACTUAL EXERCISE EXERCISABLE AT EXERCISE PRICES DEC. 31, 1999 LIFE PRICE DEC. 31, 1999 PRICE -------------- -------------- ----------- --------- -------------- --------- $ 6.94 - 14.50 2,904,852 4.9 years $ 14.10 657,773 $ 12.75 16.81 - 29.50 1,607,932 3.9 years 20.52 1,150,006 21.64 31.75 - 39.63 667,072 2.4 years 34.10 667,072 34.10 40.25 - 52.25 668,000 3.6 years 45.86 646,750 46.04 -------------- -------------- 5,847,856 3,121,601 ============== ============== EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN The Company has an employee stock purchase plan that provides for the award of ordinary shares to officers and employees. Under the terms of the plan, employees can choose each semi-annual period to have up to 15% of their annual gross or base compensation withheld to purchase the Company's ordinary shares. The purchase price of the stock is 85% of the lower of its beginning of period or end of period market price. Under the plan, the Company sold 49,367 shares and 46,648 shares to employees for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. FAIR VALUE OF STOCK COMPENSATION The Company applies Opinion 25 in accounting for its plans. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for its fixed stock option plans and stock purchase plan. Had the Company elected to recognize compensation expense consistent with the fair value-based methodology in SFAS 123, the Company's net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share would have been as follows: [Download Table] YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------ 1999 1998 1997 ------- ---------- --------- Net earnings (loss) applicable to ordinary shares: As reported $18,886 $(190,565) $ (9,296) Pro forma 12,579 (200,147) (16,802) Basic earnings (loss) per ordinary share: As reported $ 0.52 $ (5.21) $ (0.26) Pro forma 0.35 (5.47) (0.46) Diluted earnings (loss) per ordinary share: As reported $ 0.52 $ (5.21) $ (0.25) Pro forma 0.35 (5.47) (0.46) The fair value of each option granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in 1999, 1998 and 1997: dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility of approximately 54%, 40% and 26%, respectively; risk-free interest rates of approximately 6%, 5% and 6%, respectively; and an expected life of approximately three to seven years. STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS PLAN The Company had a stock appreciation rights ("SARs") plan which granted SARs to non-employee directors of the Company. Upon exercise, SARs allow the holder to receive the difference between the SARs' exercise price and the fair market value of the ordinary shares covered by SARs on the exercise date and expire at the earlier of 10 years or a date based on the termination of the holder's membership on the board of directors. At December 31, 1999, SARs covering 20,000 ordinary shares, with an exercise price of $8.00 per share, were outstanding. 14. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, RISK MANAGEMENT AND CREDIT RISK CONCENTRATIONS FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS At December 31, 1999 and 1998, the Company's financial instruments included cash and equivalents, short-term receivables, long-term receivables, short-term and long-term debt, and financial market transactions. The fair value of cash, cash equivalents, short-term receivables and short-term debt approximated carrying values because of the short maturities of these instruments. The fair values of the Company's long-term receivables and financial market transactions, based on broker quotes and discounted cash flows, approximated the carrying values. The estimated fair value of long-term debt, based on quoted market prices and market data for similar instruments, was $416 million (carrying value - $413 million) and $397 million (carrying value - $428 million) at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. RISK MANAGEMENT Oil and natural gas sold by the Company are normally priced with reference to a defined benchmark, such as light, sweet crude oil traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (WTI). Actual prices received vary from the benchmark depending on quality and location differentials. From time to time, it is the Company's policy to use financial market transactions, including swaps, collars and options, with creditworthy counterparties primarily to reduce risk associated with the pricing of a portion of the oil and natural gas that it sells. The policy is structured to underpin the Company's planned revenues and results of operations. The Company does not enter into financial market transactions for trading purposes. There can be no assurance that the use of financial market transactions will not result in losses. During the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1997, markets provided the Company the opportunity to realize WTI benchmark oil prices on average $6.37 per barrel and $2.35 per barrel, respectively, above the WTI benchmark oil price the Company set as part of its annual plan for the period. During the year ended December 31, 1998, the Company did not have any outstanding financial market transactions to hedge against oil price fluctuations. As a result of financial and commodity market transactions settled during the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1997, the Company's risk management program resulted in an average net realization of approximately $1.65 per barrel and $.11 per barrel, respectively, lower than if the Company had not entered into such transactions. In anticipation of entering into the forward oil sale, in 1995 the Company purchased WTI benchmark call options to retain the ability to benefit from WTI price increases above a weighted average price of $20.42 per barrel. The volumes and expiration dates on the call options coincide with the volumes and delivery dates of the forward oil sale which will be completed in March 2000. During the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, the Company recorded a gain (loss) of $6.1 million, $.4 million, and ($9.7 million), respectively, in other income (expense), net, related to the change in the fair market value of the call options. In November 1999, the Company sold WTI benchmark call options with the same notional quantities, strike price and contract period as the remaining call option contracts outstanding for a premium of $4.4 million for the purpose of realizing the fair value of the purchased call options. As a result, the Company has eliminated its exposure to future changes in value of the call options caused by fluctuations in oil prices. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK Financial instruments that are potentially subject to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash equivalents, receivables and financial market transactions. The Company places its cash equivalents and financial market transactions with high credit-quality financial institutions. The Company believes the risk of incurring losses related to credit risk is remote. The Company sells its crude oil production from the Cusiana and Cupiagua fields through an agreement with a third party to approximately 10 to 15 buyers located primarily in the United States. The Company does not believe that the loss of any single customer or a termination of the agreement with the third party would have a long-term material, adverse effect on its operations.
10-K/A10th “Page” of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 10th
15. OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET Other income (expense), net is summarized as follows: [Download Table] YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 -------- -------- -------- Equity swap $(6,858) $(3,283) $--- Change in fair market value of WTI benchmark call options 6,150 366 (9,689) Foreign exchange gain (loss) (2,674) 2,113 9,549 Loss provisions (2,250) (750) --- Gain on sale of corporate assets 443 7,593 1,414 Other 1,575 2,441 1,598 -------- -------- -------- $(3,614) $ 8,480 $ 2,872 ======== ======== ======== In 1999, 1998 and 1997, the Company recognized a net foreign exchange gain (loss) of ($2.7 million), $2.1 million and $9.5 million, respectively, consisting primarily of noncash adjustments related to deferred taxes in Colombia associated with devaluation of the Colombian peso versus the U.S. dollar. 16. EARNINGS PER ORDINARY SHARE The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per ordinary share computation for earnings from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1997. [Enlarge/Download Table] INCOME SHARES PER-SHARE (NUMERATOR) (DENOMINATOR) AMOUNT ------------ ------------ ------------ YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999: Net earnings $ 47,557 Less: Accumulated dividends on preference shares (28,671) ------------ Earnings available to ordinary shareholders 18,886 Basic earnings per ordinary share 36,135 $ 0.52 ============ Effect of dilutive securities Stock options --- 62 ------------ ------------ Earnings available to ordinary shareholders and assumed conversions $ 18,886 ============ Diluted earnings per ordinary share 36,197 $ 0.52 ============ ============
10-K/A11th “Page” of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 11th
[Enlarge/Download Table] INCOME SHARES PER-SHARE (NUMERATOR) (DENOMINATOR) AMOUNT ----------- ------------- --------- YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997: Earnings before extraordinary item $ 5,595 Less: Accumulated dividends on preference shares (400) ----------- Earnings available to ordinary shareholders 5,195 Basic earnings per ordinary share 36,471 $ 0.14 ========= Effect of dilutive securities Stock options --- 457 Convertible debentures --- 80 ----------- ------------- Earnings available to ordinary shareholders and assumed conversions $ 5,195 =========== Diluted earnings per ordinary share 37,008 $ 0.14 ============= ========= For the year ended December 31, 1998, the computation of diluted net loss per ordinary share was antidilutive, and therefore, the amounts reported for basic and diluted net loss per ordinary share were the same. At December 31, 1999, 5,193,643 shares of 8% Convertible Preference Shares and 209,639 shares of 5% Convertible Preference Shares were outstanding. Each 8% Convertible Preference Share is convertible any time into four ordinary shares, subject to adjustment in certain events. Each 5% Convertible Preference Share is convertible any time into one ordinary share, subject to adjustment in certain events. The 8% Convertible Preference Shares and 5% Convertible Preference Shares were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per ordinary share because the effect of assuming conversion was antidilutive. 17. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Supplemental disclosures of cash payments and noncash investing and financing activities follow: [Download Table] YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 -------- ------- -------- Cash paid during the year for: Interest (net of amount capitalized) $22,810 $24,517 $133,265 Income taxes 5,564 4,339 4,666 Noncash financing activities: 8% Convertible preference shares issued in lieu of cash dividend $13,747 $ --- $ --- Conversion of preference shares into ordinary shares 192 297 1,004 Cash paid for interest in 1997 included $124.8 million of interest accreted with respect to the Senior Subordinated Discount Notes due November 1, 1997 and the 9 3/4% Senior Subordinated Discount Notes due September 15, 2000 through the dates of retirement. 18. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS Pursuant to a financial advisory agreement (the "Financial Advisory Agreement") between Triton and Hicks, Muse & Co. Partners L.P. ("Hicks Muse Partners"), an affiliate of Hicks Muse, the Company paid Hicks Muse Partners transaction fees aggregating approximately $9.6 million and $4.4 million for services as financial advisor to the Company in connection with the First Closing and Second Closing, respectively, contemplated by the Stock Purchase Agreement. In accordance with the terms of the Financial Advisory Agreement, the Company has retained Hicks Muse Partners as its exclusive financial advisor in connection with any Sale Transaction (defined below) unless Hicks Muse Partners and the Company agree to retain an additional financial advisor in connection with any particular Sale Transaction. The Financial Advisory Agreement requires the Company to pay a fee to Hicks Muse Partners in connection with any Sale Transaction (unless the Chief Executive Officer of the Company elects not to retain a financial advisor) in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the amount of fees then charged by first-tier investment banking firms for similar advisory services rendered in similar transactions or (ii) 1.5% of the Transaction Value (as defined in the Financial Advisory Agreement); provided that such fee will be divided equally between Hicks Muse Partners and any additional financial advisor which the Company and Hicks Muse Partners agree will be retained by the Company with respect to any such transaction. A "Sale Transaction" is defined as any merger, sale of securities representing a majority of the combined voting power of the Company, sale of assets of the Company representing more than 50% of the total market value of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries or other similar transaction. The Company is also required to reimburse Hicks Muse Partners for reasonable disbursements and out-of-pocket expenses of Hicks Muse Partners incurred in connection with its advisory services. Pursuant to a monitoring agreement (the "Monitoring Agreement") between Triton and Hicks Muse Partners, Hicks Muse Partners will provide financial oversight and monitoring services as requested by the Company and the Company will pay to Hicks Muse Partners an annual fee of $.5 million. In addition, the Company will reimburse Hicks Muse Partners for reasonable disbursements and out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Hicks Muse Partners or its affiliates for the account of the Company or in connection with the performance of its services. During the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, the Company paid Hicks Muse Partners $.6 million and $.1 million, respectively, under the terms of the Monitoring Agreement. The Financial Advisory Agreement and the Monitoring Agreement will remain in effect until the earlier of (i) September 30, 2008, or (ii) the date on which HM4 Triton, L.P. and its affiliates cease to own beneficially, directly or indirectly, at least 5% of the Company's outstanding Ordinary Shares (determined after giving effect to the conversion of all 8% Convertible Preference Shares held by HM4 Triton, L.P. and its affiliates). The Company has agreed to indemnify Hicks Muse Partners with respect to liabilities incurred as a result of Hicks Muse Partners' performance of services for the Company pursuant to the Financial Advisory Agreement and the Monitoring Agreement. In 1999, the Company sold its hunting lease and related facilities to HMTF Operating, L.P., an affiliate of Hicks Muse, for proceeds of $.9 million and recognized a gain of $.4 million in other income (expense), net. 19. CERTAIN FACTORS THAT COULD AFFECT FUTURE OPERATIONS Certain information contained in this report, as well as written and oral statements made or incorporated by reference from time to time by the Company and its representatives in other reports, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, press releases, conferences, teleconferences, or otherwise, may be deemed to be "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are subject to the "Safe Harbor" provisions of that section. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning the Company's and management's plans, objectives, goals, strategies and future operations and performance and the assumptions underlying such forward-looking statements. When used in this document, the words "anticipates," "estimates," "expects," "believes," "intends," "plans," and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements include information regarding: - drilling schedules; - expected or planned production capacity; - future production from the Cusiana and Cupiagua fields in Colombia, including from the Recetor license; - the completion of development and commencement of production in Malaysia-Thailand; - future production of the Ceiba field in Equatorial Guinea, including volumes and timing of first production; - the acceleration of the Company's exploration, appraisal and development activities in Equatorial Guinea; - the Company's capital budget and future capital requirements; - the Company's meeting its future capital needs; - the Company's utilization of net operating loss carryforwards and realization of its deferred tax asset; - the level of future expenditures for environmental costs; - the outcome of regulatory and litigation matters; - the estimated fair value of derivative instruments, including the equity swap; and - proven oil and gas reserves and discounted future net cash flows therefrom. These statements are based on current expectations and involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including those described in the context of such forward-looking statements, as well as those presented below. Actual results and developments could differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such statements due to these and other factors. CERTAIN FACTORS RELATING TO THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY The markets for oil and natural gas historically have been volatile and are likely to continue to be volatile in the future. Oil and natural gas prices have been subject to significant fluctuations during the past several decades in response to relatively minor changes in the supply of and demand for oil and natural gas, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond the control of the Company. These factors include the level of consumer product demand, weather conditions, domestic and foreign government regulations, political conditions in the Middle East and other production areas, the foreign supply of oil and natural gas, the price and availability of alternative fuels, and overall economic conditions. It is impossible to predict future oil and gas price movements with any certainty. The Company follows the full cost method of accounting for exploration and development of oil and gas reserves, whereby all acquisition, exploration and development costs are capitalized. Costs related to acquisition, holding and initial exploration of licenses in countries with no proved reserves are initially capitalized, including internal costs directly identified with acquisition, exploration and development activities. The Company's exploration licenses are periodically assessed for impairment on a country-by-country basis. If the Company's investment in exploration licenses within a country where no proved reserves are assigned is deemed to be impaired, the licenses are written down to estimated recoverable value. If the Company abandons all exploration efforts in a country where no proved reserves are assigned, all acquisition and exploration costs associated with the country are expensed. The Company's assessments of whether its investment within a country is impaired and whether exploration activities within a country will be abandoned are made from time to time based on its review and assessment of drilling results, seismic data and other information it deems relevant. Due to the unpredictable nature of exploration drilling activities, the amount and timing of impairment expense are difficult to predict with any certainty. Financial information concerning the Company's assets at December 31, 1999, including capitalized costs by geographic area, is set forth in note 21. The Company's oil and gas business is also subject to all of the operating risks normally associated with the exploration for and production of oil and gas, including, without limitation, blowouts, explosion, uncontrollable flows of oil, gas or well fluids, pollution, earthquakes, formations with abnormal pressures, labor disruptions and fires, each of which could result in substantial losses to the Company due to injury or loss of life and damage to or destruction of oil and gas wells, formations, production facilities or other properties. In accordance with customary industry practices, the Company maintains insurance coverage limiting financial loss resulting from certain of these operating hazards. Losses and liabilities arising from uninsured or underinsured events would reduce revenues and increase costs to the Company. There can be no assurance that any insurance will be adequate to cover losses or liabilities. The Company cannot predict the continued availability of insurance, or its availability at premium levels that justify its purchase. The Company's oil and gas business is also subject to laws, rules and regulations in the countries where it operates, which generally pertain to production control, taxation, environmental and pricing concerns, and other matters relating to the petroleum industry. Many jurisdictions have at various times imposed limitations on the production of natural gas and oil by restricting the rate of flow for oil and natural gas wells below their actual capacity. There can be no assurance that present or future regulation will not adversely affect the operations of the Company. The Company is subject to extensive environmental laws and regulations. These laws regulate the discharge of oil, gas or other materials into the environment and may require the Company to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the disposal or release of such materials at various sites. In addition, the Company could be held liable for environmental damages caused by previous owners of its properties or its predecessors. The Company does not believe that its environmental risks are materially different from those of comparable companies in the oil and gas industry. Nevertheless, no assurance can be given that environmental laws and regulations will not, in the future, adversely affect the Company's consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Pollution and similar environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. CERTAIN FACTORS RELATING TO INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS The Company derives substantially all of its consolidated revenues from international operations. Risks inherent in international operations include risk of expropriation, nationalization, war, revolution, border disputes, renegotiation or modification of existing contracts, import, export and transportation regulations and tariffs; taxation policies, including royalty and tax increases and retroactive tax claims; exchange controls, currency fluctuations and other uncertainties arising out of foreign government sovereignty over the Company's international operations; laws and policies of the United States affecting foreign trade, taxation and investment; and the possibility of having to be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts in connection with legal disputes and the possible inability to subject foreign persons to the jurisdiction of courts in the United States. To date, the Company's international operations have not been materially affected by these risks. CERTAIN FACTORS RELATING TO COLOMBIA The Company is a participant in significant oil and gas discoveries in the Cusiana and Cupiagua fields, located approximately 160 kilometers (100 miles) northeast of Bogota, Colombia. Development of reserves in the Cusiana and Cupiagua fields is ongoing and will require additional drilling. Pipelines connect the major producing fields in Colombia to export facilities and to refineries. From time to time, guerrilla activity in Colombia has disrupted the operation of oil and gas projects. Such activity increased over the last year and appears to be increasing as political negotiations among government and various rebel groups proceed. In one recent case, a bomb planted near the pipeline caused OCENSA to halt shipments, which in turn caused the operator of the fields to curtail production for approximately two days. Although the Colombian government, the Company and its partners have taken steps to maintain security and favorable relations with the local population, there can be no assurance that attempts to reduce or prevent guerrilla activity will be successful or that guerrilla activity will not disrupt operations in the future. Colombia is among several nations whose progress in stemming the production and transit of illegal drugs is subject to annual certification by the President of the United States. Although the President granted Colombia certification in 1999, Colombia was denied certification the last two years and only received a national interest waiver for one of those years. There can be no assurance that, in the future, Colombia will receive certification or a national interest waiver. The consequences of the failure to receive certification or a national interest waiver generally include the following: all bilateral aid, except anti-narcotics and humanitarian aid, would be suspended; the Export-Import Bank of the United States and the Overseas Private Investment Corporation would not approve financing for new projects in Colombia; U.S. representatives at multilateral lending institutions would be required to vote against all loan requests from Colombia, although such votes would not constitute vetoes; and the President of the United States and Congress would retain the right to apply future trade sanctions. Each of these consequences could result in adverse economic consequences in Colombia and could further heighten the political and economic risks associated with the Company's operations in Colombia. Any changes in the holders of significant government offices could have adverse consequences on the Company's relationship with the Colombian national oil company and the Colombian government's ability to control guerrilla activities and could exacerbate the factors relating to foreign operations discussed above. CERTAIN FACTORS RELATING TO MALAYSIA-THAILAND The Company is a partner in a significant gas exploration project located in the Gulf of Thailand approximately 450 kilometers (280 miles) northeast of Kuala Lumpur and 750 kilometers (470 miles) south of Bangkok as a contractor under a production-sharing contract covering Block A-18 of the Malaysia-Thailand Joint Development Area. On October 30, 1999, the Company and the other parties to the production-sharing contract for Block A-18 executed a gas sales agreement providing for the sale of the first phase of gas. Under terms of the gas sales agreement, delivery of gas is scheduled to begin by the end of the second quarter of 2002, following timely completion and approval of an environmental impact assessment associated with the buyers' pipeline and processing facilities. No assurance can be given as to when such approval will be obtained. A lengthy approval process, or significant opposition to the project, could delay construction and the commencement of gas sales. In connection with the sale to ARCO of one-half of the shares through which the Company owned its interest in Block A-18, ARCO agreed to pay the future exploration and development costs attributable to the Company's and ARCO's collective interest in Block A-18, up to $377 million or until first production from a gas field, after which the Company and ARCO would each pay 50% of such costs. There can be no assurance that the Company's and ARCO's collective share of the cost of developing the project will not exceed $377 million. ARCO also agreed to pay the Company certain incentive payments if certain criteria were met. The first $65 million in incentive payments is conditioned upon having the production facilities for the sale of gas from Block A-18 completed by June 30, 2002. If the facilities are completed after June 30, 2002 but before June 30, 2003, the incentive payment would be reduced to $40 million. A lengthy environmental approval process, or unanticipated delays in construction of the facilities, could result in the Company's receiving a reduced incentive payment or possibly the complete loss of the first incentive payment. In addition, the Company has agreed to share with ARCO some of the risk that the environmental approval might be delayed by agreeing to pay to ARCO $1.25 million per month for each month, if applicable, that first gas sales are delayed beyond 30 months following the commitment to an engineering, procurement and construction contract for the project. The Company's obligation is capped at 24 months of these payments. INFLUENCE OF HICKS MUSE In connection with the issuance of 8% Convertible Preference Shares to HM4 Triton, L.P., the Company and HM4 Triton, L.P. entered into a shareholders agreement (the "Shareholders Agreement") pursuant to which, among other things, the size of the Company's Board of Directors was set at ten, and HM4 Triton, L.P. exercised its right to designate four out of such ten directors. The Shareholders Agreement provides that, in general, for so long as the entire Board of Directors consists of ten members, HM4 Triton, L.P. (and its designated transferees, collectively) may designate four nominees for election to the Board of Directors. The right of HM4 Triton, L.P. (and its designated transferees) to designate nominees for election to the Board will be reduced if the number of ordinary shares held by HM4 Triton, L.P. and its affiliates (assuming conversion of 8% Convertible Preference Shares into ordinary shares) represents less than certain specified percentages of the number of ordinary shares (assuming conversion of 8% Convertible Preference Shares into ordinary shares) purchased by HM4 Triton, L.P. pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement. The Shareholders Agreement provides that, for so long as HM4 Triton, L.P. and its affiliates continue to hold a certain minimum number of ordinary shares (assuming conversion of 8% Convertible Preference Shares into ordinary shares), the Company may not take certain actions without the consent of HM4 Triton, L.P., including (i) amending its Articles of Association or the terms of the 8% Convertible Preference Shares with respect to the voting powers, rights or preferences of the holders of 8% Convertible Preference Shares, (ii) entering into a merger or similar business combination transaction, or effecting a reorganization, recapitalization or other transaction pursuant to which a majority of the outstanding ordinary shares or any 8% Convertible Preference Shares are exchanged for securities, cash or other property, (iii) authorizing, creating or modifying the terms of any series of securities that would rank equal to or senior to the 8% Convertible Preference Shares, (iv) selling or otherwise disposing of assets comprising in excess of 50% of the market value of the Company, (v) paying dividends on ordinary shares or other shares ranking junior to the 8% Convertible Preference Shares, other than regular dividends on the Company's 5% Convertible Preference Shares, (vi) incurring or guaranteeing indebtedness (other than certain permitted indebtedness), or issuing preference shares, unless the Company's leverage ratio at the time, after giving pro forma effect to such incurrence or issuance and to the use of the proceeds, is less than 2.5 to 1, (vii) issuing additional shares of 8% Convertible Preference Shares, other than in payment of accumulated dividends on the outstanding 8% Convertible Preference Shares, (viii) issuing any shares of a class ranking equal or senior to the 8% Convertible Preference Shares, (ix) commencing a tender offer or exchange offer for all or any portion of the ordinary shares or (x) decreasing the number of shares designated as 8% Convertible Preference Shares. As a result of HM4 Triton, L.P.'s ownership of 8% Convertible Preference Shares and ordinary shares and the rights conferred upon HM4 Triton, L.P. and its designees pursuant to the Shareholder Agreement, HM4 Triton, L.P. has significant influence over the actions of the Company and will be able to influence, and in some cases determine, the outcome of matters submitted for approval of the shareholders. The existence of HM4 Triton, L.P. as a shareholder of the Company may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or discourage a third party from seeking to acquire, a majority of the outstanding ordinary shares. A third party would be required to negotiate any such transaction with HM4 Triton, L.P. and the interests of HM4 Triton, L.P. as a shareholder may be different from the interests of the other shareholders of the Company. POSSIBLE FUTURE ACQUISITIONS The Company's strategy includes the possible acquisition of additional reserves, including through possible future business combination transactions. There can be no assurance as to the terms upon which any such acquisitions would be consummated or as to the affect any such transactions would have on the Company's financial condition or results of operations. Such acquisitions, if any, could involve the use of the Company's cash, or the issuance of the Company's debt or equity securities, which could have a dilutive effect on the current shareholders. COMPETITION The Company encounters strong competition from major oil companies (including government-owned companies), independent operators and other companies for favorable oil and gas concessions, licenses, production-sharing contracts and leases, drilling rights and markets. Additionally, the governments of certain countries in which the Company operates may, from time to time, give preferential treatment to their nationals. The oil and gas industry as a whole also competes with other industries in supplying the energy and fuel requirements of industrial, commercial and individual consumers. The Company believes that the principal means of competition in the sale of oil and gas are product availability, price and quality. MARKETS Crude oil, natural gas, condensate, and other oil and gas products generally are sold to other oil and gas companies, government agencies and other industries. The availability of ready markets for oil and gas that might be discovered by the Company and the prices obtained for such oil and gas depend on many factors beyond the Company's control, including the extent of local production and imports of oil and gas, the proximity and capacity of pipelines and other transportation facilities, fluctuating demands for oil and gas, the marketing of competitive fuels, and the effects of governmental regulation of oil and gas production and sales. Pipeline facilities do not exist in certain areas of exploration and, therefore, any actual sales of discovered oil or gas might be delayed for extended periods until such facilities are constructed. LITIGATION The outcome of litigation and its impact on the Company are difficult to predict due to many uncertainties, such as jury verdicts, the application of laws to various factual situations, the actions that may or may not be taken by other parties and the availability of insurance. In addition, in certain situations, such as environmental claims, one defendant may be responsible for the liabilities of other parties. Moreover, circumstances could arise under which the Company may elect to settle claims at amounts that exceed the Company's expected liability for such claims in an attempt to avoid costly litigation. Judgments or settlements could, therefore, exceed any reserves. 20. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES For internal planning purposes, the Company's capital spending program for the year ending December 31, 2000, is approximately $191 million, excluding capitalized interest and acquisitions, of which approximately $122 million relates to exploration and development activities in Equatorial Guinea, $58 million relates to the Cusiana and Cupiagua fields in Colombia and $11 million relates to the Company's exploration activities in other parts of the world. During the normal course of business, the Company is subject to the terms of various operating agreements and capital commitments associated with the exploration and development of its oil and gas properties. It is management's belief that such commitments, including the capital requirements in Colombia, Equatorial Guinea and other parts of the world discussed above, will be met without any material adverse effect on the Company's operations or consolidated financial condition. The Company leases office space, other facilities and equipment under various operating leases expiring through 2005. Total rental expense was $1.3 million, $2.1 million and $2 million for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. At December 31, 1999, the minimum payments required under terms of the leases are as follows 2000 -- $1.5 million; 2001 -- $1.6 million; 2002 -- $1.6 million; 2003 -- $1.6 million; 2004 -- $1.6 million; and thereafter $1 million. GUARANTEES At December 31, 1999, the Company had guaranteed the performance of a total of $16.4 million in future exploration expenditures to be incurred through September 2001 in various countries. A total of approximately $6 million of the exploration expentitures are included in the 2000 capital spending program related to a commitment for two onshore exploratory wells in Greece. These commitments are backed primarily by unsecured letters of credit. The Company also had guaranteed loans of approximately $1.4 million, which expire September 2000, for a Colombian pipeline company, ODC, in which the Company has an ownership interest. ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS The Company is subject to extensive environmental laws and regulations. These laws regulate the discharge of oil, gas or other materials into the environment and may require the Company to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the disposal or release of such materials at various sites. The Company believes that the level of future expenditures for environmental matters, including clean-up obligations, is impracticable to determine with a precise and reliable degree of accuracy. Management believes that such costs, when finally determined, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations or consolidated financial condition. LITIGATION In July through October 1998, eight lawsuits were filed against the Company and Thomas G. Finck and Peter Rugg, in their capacities as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively. The lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division, and have been consolidated and are styled In re: Triton Energy Limited Securities Litigation. In November 1999, the plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint. It alleges violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, in connection with disclosures concerning the Company's properties, operations, and value relating to a prospective sale of the Company or of all or a part of its assets. The lawsuits seek recovery of an unspecified amount of compensatory damages, fees and costs. In the consolidated complaint, the plaintiffs abandoned a claim for negligent misrepresentation and punitive damages that had previously been asserted in one of the eight individual suits. In September 1999, the court granted the plaintiffs' motion for appointment as lead plaintiffs and for approval of selection of lead counsel. In October 1999, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the claims alleged in the eight individual suits, and in December 1999, the defendants filed a supplement to their motion to dismiss to address the plaintiffs' consolidated complaint. The Company's motion, as supplemented, is currently pending. The Company believes its disclosures have been accurate and intends to vigorously defend these actions. There can be no assurance that the litigation will be resolved in the Company's favor. An adverse result could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations. In November 1999, a lawsuit was filed against the Company, and one of its subsidiaries and Thomas G. Finck, Peter Rugg and Robert B. Holland, III, in their capacities as officers of the Company, in the District Court of the State of Texas for Dallas County. The lawsuit is styled Aaron Sherman, et al. vs. Triton Energy Corporation et al. and seeks an unspecified amount of compensatory and punitive damages and interest. The lawsuit alleges as causes of action fraud and negligent misrepresentation in connection with disclosures concerning the prospective sale by the Company of all or a substantial part of its assets announced in March 1998. The Company's date to answer has not yet run. Its subsidiary has filed various motions to dispose of the lawsuit on the grounds that the plantiffs do not have standing. The Court has ordered the plantiffs to replead and has stayed discovery pending its further orders. In August 1997, the Company was sued in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, by David A. Hite, Nordell International Resources Ltd., and International Veronex Resources, Ltd. The action has since been removed to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The Company and the plaintiffs were adversaries in a 1990 arbitration proceeding in which the interest of Nordell International Resources Ltd. in the Enim oil field in Indonesia was awarded to the Company (subject to a 5% net profits interest for Nordell) and Nordell was ordered to pay the Company nearly $1 million. The arbitration award was followed by a series of legal actions by the parties in which the validity of the award and its enforcement were at issue. As a result of these proceedings, the award was ultimately upheld and enforced. The current suit alleges that the plaintiffs were damaged in amounts aggregating $13 million primarily because of the Company's prosecution of various claims against the plaintiffs as well as its alleged misrepresentations, infliction of emotional distress, and improper accounting practices. The suit seeks specific performance of the arbitration award, damages for alleged fraud and misrepresentation in accounting for Enim field operating results, an accounting for Nordell's 5% net profit interest, and damages for emotional distress and various other alleged torts. The suit seeks interest, punitive damages and attorneys fees in addition to the alleged actual damages. In August 1998, the district court dismissed all claims asserted by the plaintiffs other than claims for malicious prosecution and abuse of the legal process, which the court held could not be subject to a motion to dismiss. The abuse of process claim was later withdrawn, and the damages sought were reduced to approximately $700,000 (not including punitive damages). The lawsuit was tried and the jury found in favor of the plaintiffs and assessed compensatory damages against the Company in the amount of approximately $700,000 and punitive damages in the amount of approximately $11 million. The Company believes it has acted appropriately and intends to appeal the verdict. The Company is subject to certain other litigation matters, none of which is expected to have a material, adverse effect on the Company's operations or consolidated financial condition. 21. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Triton's operations are primarily related to crude oil and natural gas exploration and production. The Company's principal properties, operations and oil and gas reserves are located in Colombia, Malaysia-Thailand and Equatorial Guinea. The Company is exploring for oil and gas in these areas, as well as in southern Europe, Africa and the Middle East. All sales are currently derived from oil and gas production in Colombia. Financial information about the Company's operations by geographic area is presented below: [Enlarge/Download Table] CORPORATE MALAYSIA- EQUATORIAL AND COLOMBIA THAILAND GUINEA EXPLORATION OTHER TOTAL --------- --------- ---------- ----------- --------- ---------- YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999: Sales and other operating revenues $ 247,878 $ --- $ --- $ --- $ --- $ 247,878 Operating income (loss) 115,877 --- (469) (7,214) (16,334) 91,860 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 59,728 --- 16 144 1,455 61,343 Capital expenditures and investments 79,889 8,453 19,968 12,419 754 121,483 Assets 476,543 93,188 37,229 85,250 282,265 974,475 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998: Sales and other operating revenues $ 160,881 $ 63,237 $ --- $ 4,500 $ --- $ 228,618 Operating income (loss) (220,697) 62,538 (124) (79,703) (39,360) (277,346) Depreciation, depletion and amortization 53,641 49 1 175 4,945 58,811 Writedown of assets 251,312 --- --- 76,664 654 328,630 Capital expenditures and investments 106,624 25,319 5,913 41,603 756 180,215 Assets 468,533 84,735 10,766 78,086 112,160 754,280 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997: Sales and other operating revenues $ 145,419 $ --- $ --- $ 4,077 $ --- $ 149,496 Operating income (loss) 59,719 (536) (42) (6,270) (20,167) 32,704 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 31,186 60 --- 505 5,077 36,828 Capital expenditures and investments 129,589 37,328 4,471 43,371 4,457 219,216 Assets 712,512 148,780 4,841 105,720 126,186 1,098,039 During 1998, the Company sold one-half of the shares of the subsidiary through which the Company owned its 50% share of Block A-18 resulting in a gain of $63.2 million which is included in Malaysia-Thailand sales and other operating revenues and operating income (loss). See note 2 - Asset Dispositions. After the sale, which resulted in a 50% ownership in the previously wholly owned subsidiary, the Company's remaining ownership is accounted for using the equity method. This investment in Block A-18 is presented in Malaysia-Thailand assets at December 31, 1999 and 1998. Colombia operating income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 1998, included a SEC full cost ceiling limitation writedown of $241 million. Additionally, Exploration operating income (loss) included writedowns of oil and gas properties and other assets totaling $76.7 million for the year ended December 31, 1998. At December 31, 1999, corporate assets were principally cash and equivalents and the U.S. deferred tax asset. Exploration assets included $41.6 million, $17.6 million, $16.5 million and $8.4 million in Italy, Greece, Oman and Madagascar, respectively. 22. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) The Company has revised its method pursuant to which it accounts for accumulated dividends on preference shares for purposes of determining earnings applicable to ordinary shares and earnings per share. The Company has included the dividends accumulated during each quarter in respect of its preference shares, whether or not declared for purposes of arriving at earnings applicable to ordinary shares, rather than including accumulated dividends only in the quarter when a dividend is declared. This revision does not affect any balance sheet item or net earnings. The basic earnings (loss) per ordinary share amounts previously reported were $0.05, $(0.08), $0.32 and $0.24 for the first, second, third and fourth quarters in 1999, respectively. The diluted earnings (loss) per ordinary share amounts previously reported were $0.03, $(0.08), $0.20 and $0.23 for the first, second, third and fourth quarters in 1999, respectively. The basic earnings (loss) per ordinary share amounts previously reported were $1.29 and $(3.55) for the third and fourth quarters in 1998. The diluted earnings (loss) per ordinary share amount previously reported was $(3.55) for the fourth quarter in 1998. There were no changes to earnings per ordinary share for other periods presented. [Enlarge/Download Table] QUARTER ------------------------------------------- FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH --------- ---------- -------- ---------- YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999: Sales and other operating revenues $ 49,170 $ 59,622 $ 67,295 $ 71,791 Gross profit 14,823 25,151 32,349 46,082 Net earnings 1,887 10,883 11,762 23,025 Basic earnings (loss) per ordinary share (0.14) 0.11 0.12 0.44 Diluted earnings (loss) per ordinary share (0.14) 0.11 0.12 0.40 Investment in affiliate 86,704 88,179 91,008 93,188 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998: Sales and other operating revenues $ 36,175 $ 36,378 $105,862 $ 50,203 Gross profit (loss) 8,409 (180,179) 73,751 (134,350) Net earnings (loss) 42,912 (150,062) 47,208 (127,562) Basic earnings (loss) per ordinary share 1.17 (4.10) 1.29 (3.56) Diluted earnings (loss) per ordinary share 1.16 (4.10) 1.28 (3.56) Investment in affiliate --- --- 82,511 84,735 Gross profit (loss) is comprised of sales and other operating revenues less operating expenses, depreciation, depletion and amortization, and writedowns pertaining to operating assets. Gross profit for the fourth quarter of 1999 included a non-recurring credit issued by OCENSA in February 2000 totaling $4.2 million. The credit to pipeline tariffs resulted from OCENSA's compliance with a Colombian government decree in December 1999 that reduced its 1999 noncash expenses. 23. OIL AND GAS DATA (UNAUDITED) The following tables provide additional information about the Company's oil and gas exploration and production activities. The oil and gas data reflect the Company's proportionate interest in Block A-18 on an equity investment basis since the sale of one-half of the subsidiary through which the Company owned its 50% share of Block A-18 in August 1998. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The results of operations for oil- and gas-producing activities, considering direct costs only, follow: [Download Table] COLOMBIA -------- YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999: Revenues $247,878 Costs: Production costs 68,130 General operating expenses 3,954 Depletion 59,512 Income tax expense 42,083 -------- Results of operations $ 74,199 ======== [Download Table] MALAYSIA- TOTAL COLOMBIA THAILAND OTHER WORLDWIDE --------- --------- --------- --------- YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998: Revenues $ 160,881 $ 63,237 $ 4,500 $ 228,618 Costs: Production costs 73,546 --- --- 73,546 General operating expenses 2,460 --- --- 2,460 Depletion 53,304 --- --- 53,304 Writedown of assets 251,312 --- 76,664 327,976 Income tax benefit (76,048) --- (22,527) (98,575) ---------- --------- ---------- ---------- Results of operations $(143,693) $ 63,237 $ (49,637) $(130,093) ========== ========= ========== ========== [Download Table] TOTAL COLOMBIA OTHER WORLDWIDE -------- ------- --------- YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997: Revenues $145,419 $ 4,077 $ 149,496 Costs: Production costs 51,357 --- 51,357 General operating expenses 2,886 --- 2,886 Depletion 30,729 --- 30,729 Income tax expense 22,167 1,223 23,390 -------- ------- --------- Results of operations $ 38,280 $ 2,854 $ 41,134 ======== ======= ========= Malaysia-Thailand revenues for the year ended December 31, 1998, included a gain of $63.2 million from the sale of one-half of the shares of the subsidiary through which the Company owned its 50% share of Block A-18. Other revenues for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997, included gains of $4.5 million, and $4.1 million from the sale of the Company's Bangladesh subsidiary and Argentine subsidiary, respectively. Depletion includes depreciation on support equipment and facilities calculated on the unit-of-production method.
10-K/A12th “Page” of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 12th
COSTS INCURRED AND CAPITALIZED COSTS The costs incurred in oil and gas acquisition, exploration and development activities and related capitalized costs follow: [Download Table] EQUATORIAL TOTAL COLOMBIA GUINEA OTHER WORLDWIDE -------- ------- ------ --------- DECEMBER 31, 1999: Costs incurred: Property acquisition $ 6,400 $ --- $ 20 $ 6,420 Exploration 155 23,631 13,051 36,837 Development 80,782 --- --- 80,782 Depletion per equivalent barrel of production 3.80 --- --- 3.80 Cost of properties at year-end: Unevaluated $ --- $ 5,772 $72,755 $ 78,527 ======== ======= ======= ======== Evaluated $530,947 $28,613 $ 680 $560,240 ======== ======= ======= ======== Support equipment and facilities $303,244 $ 709 $ --- $303,953 ======== ======= ======= ======== Accumulated depletion and depreciation at year-end $419,651 $ --- $ 680 $420,331 ======== ======= ======= ======== [Enlarge/Download Table] MALAYSIA- EQUATORIAL TOTAL COLOMBIA THAILAND GUINEA OTHER WORLDWIDE -------- --------- ---------- ------- --------- DECEMBER 31, 1998: Costs incurred: Property acquisition $ --- $ --- $ --- $ 500 $ 500 Exploration 2,886 17,739 5,913 43,153 69,691 Development 83,088 1,026 --- --- 84,114 Depletion per equivalent barrel of production 4.07 --- --- --- 4.07 Cost of properties at year-end: Unevaluated $ --- $ --- $ 10,754 $60,082 $ 70,836 ======== ========= ========== ======= ======== Evaluated $467,147 $ --- $ --- $76,367 $543,514 ======== ========= ========== ======= ======== Support equipment and facilities $289,659 $ --- $ --- $ --- $289,659 ======== ========= ========== ======= ======== Accumulated depletion and depreciation at year-end $360,324 $ --- $ --- $76,367 $436,691 ======== ========= ========== ======= ========
10-K/A13th “Page” of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 13th
[Enlarge/Download Table] MALAYSIA- EQUATORIAL TOTAL COLOMBIA THAILAND GUINEA OTHER WORLDWIDE -------- --------- ---------- ------ --------- DECEMBER 31, 1997: Costs incurred: Property acquisition $ --- $ --- $ 1,500 $ 1,628 $ 3,128 Exploration 7,583 36,373 2,971 44,893 91,820 Development 62,251 187 --- --- 62,438 Depletion per equivalent barrel of production 3.67 --- --- --- 3.67 Cost of properties at year-end: Unevaluated $ 2,172 $ 30,327 $ 4,841 $93,286 $130,626 ======== ========= ========== ======= ======== Evaluated $396,774 $ 114,243 $ --- $ 7,563 $518,580 ======== ========= ========== ======= ======== Support equipment and facilities $250,193 $ --- $ --- $ --- $250,193 ======== ========= ========== ======= ======== Accumulated depletion and depreciation at year-end $ 66,250 $ --- $ --- $ 7,563 $ 73,813 ======== ========= ========== ======= ======== A summary of costs excluded from depletion at December 31, 1999, by year incurred follows: [Download Table] DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------------- TOTAL 1999 1998 1997 1996 AND PRIOR -------- ------- ------- ------- -------------- Property acquisition $ 2,820 $ 20 $ 500 $ 1,700 $ 600 Exploration 93,258 29,697 34,394 16,008 13,159 Capitalized interest 11,062 6,587 2,971 1,383 121 -------- ------- ------- ------- ------------ Total worldwide $107,140 $36,304 $37,865 $19,091 $ 13,880 ======== ======= ======= ======= ============ The Company excludes from its depletion computation property acquisition and exploration costs of unevaluated properties and major development projects in progress. The excluded costs include $34.4 million ($28.6 million and $5.8 million classified as evaluated and unevaluated, respectively) which relate primarily to the Ceiba field in Equatorial Guinea that will become depletable once production begins, currently estimated for year end 2000. Additionally, excluded costs include exploration costs of $34.6 million, $16.8 million, $11.8 million and $8.4 million in Italy, Greece, Oman and Madagascar, respectively, where there are no proved reserves at December 31, 1999. At this time, the Company is unable to predict either the timing of the inclusion of these costs and any related oil and gas reserves in its depletion computation or their potential future impact on depletion rates. Drilling or other exploration activities are being conducted in each of these cost centers. The Company's share of costs incurred for Block A-18 were $8.2 million and $3.2 million for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Net capitalized costs were $90.2 million and $85.2 million at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
10-K/A14th “Page” of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 14th
OIL AND GAS RESERVE DATA (OIL RESERVES ARE STATED IN THOUSANDS OF BARRELS AND GAS RESERVES ARE STATED IN MILLIONS OF CUBIC FEET.) The following tables present the Company's estimates of its proved oil and gas reserves. The estimates for the proved reserves in the Cusiana and Cupiagua fields in Colombia and the Ceiba field in Equatorial Guinea were prepared by the Company's independent petroleum engineers, DeGolyer and MacNaughton and Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., respectively. The estimates for proved reserves in Malaysia-Thailand were prepared by the internal petroleum engineers of the operating company, Carigali-Triton Operating Company (CTOC). The estimates for the proved reserves in the Liebre field in Colombia were prepared by the Company's internal petroleum reservoir engineers. The Company emphasizes that reserve estimates are approximate and are expected to change as additional information becomes available. Reservoir engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and gas that cannot be measured in an exact way, and the accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the reserves set forth herein will ultimately be produced, and there can be no assurance that the proved undeveloped reserves will be developed within the periods anticipated. As of December 31, 1999, gas sales had not yet commenced from the Company's interest in the Malaysia-Thailand Joint Development Area. In estimating its reserves attributable to such interest, the Company assumed that production from the interest would be sold at the base price in the gas sales agreement of $2.30. The base price is subject to annual adjustments based on various indices. There can be no assurance as to what the actual price will be when gas sales commence. [Enlarge/Download Table] EQUITY INVESTMENT COLOMBIA EQUATORIAL GUINEA TOTAL WORLDWIDE MALAYSIA-THAILAND ----------------- ----------------- ---------------- ----------------- OIL GAS OIL GAS OIL GAS OIL GAS -------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------ ------ --------- PROVED DEVELOPED AND UNDEVELOPED RESERVES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 135,327 12,284 --- --- 135,327 12,284 8,017 570,312 Revisions (567) (259) --- --- (567) (259) 5,206 (16,450) Purchases 3,280 --- --- --- 3,280 --- --- --- Extensions and discoveries --- --- 32,033 --- 32,033 --- --- --- Production (12,469) (459) --- --- (12,469) (459) --- --- -------- ------- ------ -------- -------- ------- ------ --------- AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 125,571 11,566 32,033 --- 157,604 11,566 13,223 553,862 ======== ======= ====== ======== ======== ======= ====== ========= PROVED DEVELOPED RESERVES AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 91,859 11,566 --- --- 91,859 11,566 --- --- ======== ======= ====== ======== ======== ======= ====== =========
10-K/A15th “Page” of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 15th
[Enlarge/Download Table] EQUITY INVESTMENT COLOMBIA MALAYSIA-THAILAND TOTAL WORLDWIDE MALAYSIA-THAILAND ----------------- -------------------- -------------------- ----------------- OIL GAS OIL GAS OIL GAS OIL GAS -------- ------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- ----- ---------- PROVED DEVELOPED AND UNDEVELOPED RESERVES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 145,999 14,619 29,800 1,223,800 175,799 1,238,419 --- --- Revisions (693) (1,832) (6,583) (41,588) (7,276) (43,420) --- --- Sales --- --- (15,200) (625,400) (15,200) (625,400) --- --- Equity investment --- --- (8,017) (570,312) (8,017) (570,312) 8,017 570,312 Extensions and discoveries --- --- --- 13,500 --- 13,500 --- --- Production (9,979) (503) --- --- (9,979) (503) --- --- -------- ------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- ----- --------- AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 135,327 12,284 --- --- 135,327 12,284 8,017 570,312 ======== ======= ======== ========== ======== ========== ===== ========= PROVED DEVELOPED RESERVES AT DECEMBER 31, 1998 86,039 12,284 --- --- 86,039 12,284 --- --- ======== ======= ======== ========== ======== ========== ===== ========= [Enlarge/Download Table] COLOMBIA MALAYSIA-THAILAND TOTAL WORLDWIDE ----------------- ------------------- -------------------- OIL GAS OIL GAS OIL GAS -------- ------- ------- ---------- -------- ---------- PROVED DEVELOPED AND UNDEVELOPED RESERVES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 135,310 14,651 24,700 871,100 160,010 885,751 Revisions 14,157 770 (2,000) (7,600) 12,157 (6,830) Extensions and discoveries 2,308 --- 7,100 360,300 9,408 360,300 Production (5,776) (802) --- --- (5,776) (802) -------- ------- ------- ---------- -------- ---------- AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 145,999 14,619 29,800 1,223,800 175,799 1,238,419 ======== ======= ======= ========== ======== ========== PROVED DEVELOPED RESERVES AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 81,931 14,619 --- --- 81,931 14,619 ======== ======= ======= ========== ======== ========== STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF DISCOUNTED FUTURE NET CASH INFLOWS AND CHANGES THEREIN The following table presents for the net quantities of proved oil and gas reserves a standardized measure of discounted future net cash inflows discounted at an annual rate of 10%. The future net cash inflows were calculated in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission guidelines. Future cash inflows were computed by applying year-end prices of oil and gas relating to the Company's proved reserves to the estimated year-end quantities of those reserves. The future cash inflow estimates for 1999 attributable to oil reserves were based on the year end WTI crude oil price of $25.60 per barrel for the Company's reserves in Colombia and Malaysia-Thailand, and the year end Brent crude oil price of $24.89 per barrel for the Company's reserves in Equatorial Guinea, in each case before adjustments for oil quality and transportation costs. In 1999, the Company and the other parties to the production-sharing contract for Block A-18 executed a gas sales agreement providing for the sale of the first phase of gas. In estimating discounted future net cash inflows attributable to such interest, the Company assumed that production from the interest would be sold at the base price in the gas sales agreement of $2.30. The base price is subject to annual adjustments based on various indices. There can be no assurance as to what the actual price will be when gas sales commence. Future production and development costs were computed by estimating those expenditures expected to occur in developing and producing the proved oil and gas reserves at the end of the year, based on year-end costs. The Company emphasizes that the future net cash inflows should not be construed as representative of the fair market value of the Company's proved reserves. The meaningfulness of the estimates is highly dependent upon the accuracy of the assumptions upon which they were based. Actual future cash inflows may vary materially. In connection with the sale to ARCO of one-half of the shares through which the Company owned its interest in Block A-18, ARCO agreed to pay the Company an additional $65 million each at July 1, 2002, and July 1, 2005, if certain specific development objectives are met by such dates, or $40 million each if the objectives are met within one year thereafter. For purposes of calculating future cash inflows for Malaysia-Thailand at December 31, 1999, the Company assumed that it would receive an incentive payment of $65 million in July 2002. There can be no assurances that the Company will receive any incentive payments. See note 19, "Certain Factors that Could Affect Future Operations - Certain Factors Related to Malaysia-Thailand." [Enlarge/Download Table] EQUITY INVESTMENT EQUATORIAL TOTAL MALAYSIA- COLOMBIA GUINEA WORLDWIDE THAILAND ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- DECEMBER 31, 1999: Future cash inflows $3,152,352 $ 765,275 $3,917,627 $1,649,881 Future production and development costs 817,065 399,365 1,216,430 703,419 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Future net cash inflows before income taxes $2,335,287 $ 365,910 $2,701,197 $ 946,462 ========== ========== ========== ========== Future net cash inflows before income taxes discounted at 10% per annum $1,414,433 $ 263,849 $1,678,282 $ 266,631 Future income taxes discounted at 10% per annum 391,796 57,589 449,385 15,845 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Standardized measure of discounted future net cash inflows $1,022,637 $ 206,260 $1,228,897 $ 250,786 ========== ========== ========== ==========
10-K/ALast “Page” of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 16th
[Download Table] EQUITY INVESTMENT MALAYSIA- COLOMBIA THAILAND ---------- ---------- DECEMBER 31, 1998: Future cash inflows $1,481,065 $1,555,929 Future production and development costs 734,025 695,575 ---------- ---------- Future net cash inflows before income taxes $ 747,040 $ 860,354 ========== ========== Future net cash inflows before income taxes discounted at 10% per annum $ 415,127 $ 253,535 Future income taxes discounted at 10% per annum 3,909 8,917 ---------- ---------- Standardized measure of discounted future net cash inflows $ 411,218 $ 244,618 ========== ========== [Download Table] MALAYSIA- TOTAL COLOMBIA THAILAND WORLDWIDE ---------- ---------- ---------- DECEMBER 31, 1997: Future cash inflows $2,524,291 $4,078,609 $6,602,900 Future production and development costs 1,142,382 1,883,881 3,026,263 ---------- ---------- ---------- Future net cash inflows before income taxes $1,381,909 $2,194,728 $3,576,637 ========== ========== ========== Future net cash inflows before income taxes discounted at 10% per annum $ 852,421 $ 427,463 $1,279,884 Future income taxes discounted at 10% per annum 173,785 36,756 210,541 ---------- ---------- ---------- Standardized measure of discounted future net cash inflows $ 678,636 $ 390,707 $1,069,343 ========== ========== ========== Changes in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash inflows follow: [Enlarge/Download Table] DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 ----------- ----------- ----------- Total worldwide: Beginning of year $ 411,218 $1,069,343 $1,292,195 Sales, net of production costs (179,748) (87,335) (94,062) Sales of reserves --- (70,543) --- Equity investment --- (244,618) --- Revisions of quantity estimates (6,546) (29,321) 75,253 Net change in prices and production costs 1,105,963 (579,212) (552,863) Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery 206,260 6,516 42,918 Change in future development costs (61,728) (46,633) (5,936) Purchases of reserves 6,400 --- --- Development and facilities costs incurred 70,828 105,808 53,199 Accretion of discount 74,704 120,270 160,406 Changes in production rates and other (10,567) (30,772) (3,089) Net change in income taxes (387,887) 197,715 101,322 ----------- ----------- ----------- End of year $1,228,897 $ 411,218 $1,069,343 =========== =========== =========== SCHEDULE II TRITON ENERGY LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS (IN THOUSANDS) ADDITIONS --------- [Enlarge/Download Table] BALANCE AT CHARGED TO BALANCE BEGINNING CHARGED TO OTHER AT CLOSE CLASSIFICATIONS OF YEAR EARNINGS ACCOUNTS DEDUCTIONS OF YEAR ------------------------- ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------ --------- Year ended Dec. 31, 1997: Allowance for doubtful receivables $ 76 $ --- $ --- $ (35) $ 41 =========== ============ =========== ============ ========= Allowance for deferred tax asset $ 30,657 $ 44,435 $ --- $ --- $ 75,092 =========== ============ =========== ============ ========= Year ended Dec. 31, 1998: Allowance for doubtful receivables $ 41 $ --- $ --- $ (41) $ --- =========== ============ =========== ============ ========= Allowance for deferred tax asset $ 75,092 $ 18,519 $ --- $ --- $ 93,611 =========== ============ =========== ============ ========= Year ended Dec. 31, 1999: Allowance for deferred tax asset $ 93,611 $ (11,925) $ --- $ --- $ 81,686 =========== ============ =========== ============ =========

Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated by Reference

Referenced-On Page
This ‘10-K/A’ Filing    Date First  Last      Other Filings
9/30/0811
7/1/05115
5/22/057
4/15/052
12/31/042
3/30/045
6/30/0311
7/1/02115
6/30/0211
4/15/022
1/1/011
12/31/001110-K,  11-K
9/15/0011
Filed on:8/1/0010-Q/A
4/14/001
3/7/001
2/23/001
For Period End:12/31/9911610-K,  10-K/A,  11-K
10/30/9911
7/1/995
6/30/99510-Q,  10-Q/A
1/4/995
12/31/9811610-K405,  11-K
12/2/988424B5
3/30/985
1/1/981
12/31/9711610-K,  10-K/A,  11-K
11/1/9711
3/25/9618-A12B
1/1/945
 List all Filings 
Top
Filing Submission 0001009404-00-000030   –   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)

Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Thu., Apr. 25, 2:49:55.2pm ET