Filed On 1/22/07 6:15am ET · SEC File 333-138371 · Accession Number 950134-7-927
As Of Filer Filing As/For/On Docs:Pgs Issuer Agent
1/22/07 Duncan Energy Partners L/P S-1/A 14:543 Bowne of Dallas I..01/FA
Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration Statement (General Form) · Form S-1
Filing Table of Contents
Document/Exhibit Description Pages Size
1: S-1/A Amendment No.3 to Form S-1 - Registration No. HTML 2,301K
333-138371
2: EX-1.1 Form of Underwriting Agreement HTML 215K
3: EX-3.6 Amended Limited Liability Company Agreement HTML 118K
4: EX-5.1 Opinion of Andrews Kurth Llp HTML 8K
5: EX-8.1 Opinion of Andrews Kurth Llp HTML 9K
6: EX-10.1 Form of Contribution, Conveyance and Assumption HTML 52K
Agreement
7: EX-10.8 Form of Contribution, Conveyance and Assumption HTML 69K
Agreement
8: EX-10.9 Form of Contribution, Conveyance and Assumption HTML 58K
Agreement
9: EX-10.13 Form of Amended Limited Liability Company HTML 152K
Agreement
10: EX-10.15 Form of Amended Limited Liability Company HTML 138K
Agreement
11: EX-10.18 Form of Fourth Amended Administrative Services HTML 101K
Agreement
12: EX-10.19 Form of Omnibus Agreement HTML 64K
13: EX-21.1 List of Subsidiaries HTML 15K
14: EX-23.1 Consent of Deloitte & Touche Llp HTML 7K
S-1/A · Amendment No.3 to Form S-1 - Registration No. 333-138371
Document Table of Contents
| Page | (sequential) | | | | (alphabetic) | Top |
|---|
| | |
- Alternative Formats (RTF, XML, et al.)
- Administrative Matters
- Administrative Services Agreement
- Amendments to Our Partnership Agreement
- Appendix A Form of First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Duncan Energy Partners L.P
- Appendix B Glossary of Terms
- Assumptions and Considerations
- Balance Sheet at October 31, 2006
- Balance Sheet at September 30, 2006
- Books and Reports
- Business
- Capital Contributions
- Capitalization
- Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on Distributions
- Cash Distributions
- Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
- Change of Management Provisions
- Combined Balance Sheets at September 30, 2006, December 31, 2005 and 2004
- Common Units Eligible for Future Sale
- Compensation of Directors of DEP Holdings
- Conflicts of Interest and Business Opportunity Agreements
- Conflicts of Interest, Business Opportunity Agreements and Fiduciary Duties
- Contractual Obligations
- Contribution, Conveyance and Assumption Agreement
- Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
- Description of Material Provisions of Our Partnership Agreement
- Description of Our Common Units
- Dilution
- Directors and Executive Officers
- Disposition of Common Units
- Distributions of Available Cash
- Distributions of Cash upon Liquidation
- Duncan Energy Partners L.P
- Employees
- Environmental Matters
- Estimated Cash Available to Pay Distributions
- Executive Compensation
- Experts
- Factors Affecting Comparability of Future Results
- Fiduciary Duties
- Forward-Looking Statements
- General
- Governance Matters
- How We Evaluate Our Operations
- How We Make Cash Distributions
- Indemnification
- Index to Financial Statements
- Industry Overview
- Inflation
- Introduction
- Issuance of Additional Securities
- Legal Proceedings
- Limited Call Right
- Limited Liability
- Limited Partner Status
- Liquidation and Distribution of Proceeds
- Liquidity and Capital Resources
- Management
- Management S Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
- Material Tax Consequences
- Meetings; Voting
- Merger, Sale or Other Disposition of Assets
- Mont Belvieu Caverns Limited Liability Company Agreement
- Natural Gas Pipelines & Services Segment
- Natural Gas Supply and Outlook
- NGL & Petrochemical Storage Services Segment
- NGL Pipeline Services Segment
- Non-Citizen Assignees; Redemption
- Notes to Combined Financial Statements and Supplemental Schedule
- Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements
- Note to Balance Sheet
- Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
- Offering, The
- Omnibus Agreement
- Organization and Duration
- Other Items
- Our Business Strategy
- Our Competitive Strengths
- Our Initial Distribution Rate
- Our Operations
- Our Partnership
- Our Relationship with EPCO and Enterprise Products Partners
- Overview
- Partnership Status
- Petrochemical Pipeline Services Segment
- Power of Attorney
- Purpose
- Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
- Recent Accounting Developments
- Registration Rights
- Regulation of Operations
- Reimbursement of Expenses
- Related Party Transactions
- Related Party Transactions with Enterprise Products Partners
- Relationships with TEPPCO Partners
- Relationships with Unconsolidated Affiliate
- Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
- Resolution of Conflicts of Interest
- Results of Operations
- Right to Inspect Our Books and Records
- Risk Factors
- Risks Inherent in an Investment in Us
- Risks Inherent in Our Business
- Seasonality
- Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
- Selected Historical and Pro Forma Financial and Operating Data
- Selling Unitholder
- State, Local and Other Tax Considerations
- Statements of Combined Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited) and Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
- Statements of Combined Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited) and Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
- Statements of Combined Owners Net Investment for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
- Status as Limited Partner
- Summary
- Summary Historical and Pro Forma Financial and Operating Data
- Summary of Certain Risk Factors
- Summary of Conflicts of Interest, Business Opportunity Agreements and Fiduciary Duties
- Supplies
- Table of Contents
- Tax Consequences of Unit Ownership
- Tax-Exempt Organizations and Other Investors
- Tax Risks
- Tax Treatment of Operations
- Termination or Dissolution
- The Offering
- Title to Properties
- Transfer Agent and Registrar
- Transfer of General Partner Interest
- Transfer of Ownership Interests in Our General Partner
- Transfer of Units
- Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Available Cash
- Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet at September 30, 2006
- Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements
- Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Statement of Combined Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
- Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Statement of Combined Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2005
- Underwriting
- Uniformity of Units
- Use of Proceeds
- Validity of the Common Units
- Voting Rights
- Where You Can Find More Information
- Withdrawal or Removal of Our General Partner
|
| 1 | 1st Page
|
| " | Table of Contents
|
| " | Summary
|
| " | Duncan Energy Partners L.P
|
| " | The Offering
|
| " | Summary of Conflicts of Interest, Business Opportunity Agreements and Fiduciary Duties
|
| " | Summary of Certain Risk Factors
|
| " | Summary Historical and Pro Forma Financial and Operating Data
|
| " | Risk Factors
|
| " | Risks Inherent in Our Business
|
| " | Risks Inherent in an Investment in Us
|
| " | Tax Risks
|
| " | Use of Proceeds
|
| " | Capitalization
|
| " | Dilution
|
| " | Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on Distributions
|
| " | General
|
| " | Our Initial Distribution Rate
|
| " | Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Available Cash
|
| " | Estimated Cash Available to Pay Distributions
|
| " | Assumptions and Considerations
|
| " | How We Make Cash Distributions
|
| " | Distributions of Available Cash
|
| " | Distributions of Cash upon Liquidation
|
| " | Selected Historical and Pro Forma Financial and Operating Data
|
| " | Management S Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
| " | Overview
|
| " | Our Operations
|
| " | How We Evaluate Our Operations
|
| " | Natural Gas Supply and Outlook
|
| " | Factors Affecting Comparability of Future Results
|
| " | Results of Operations
|
| " | Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
| " | Contractual Obligations
|
| " | Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
|
| " | Inflation
|
| " | Seasonality
|
| " | Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
|
| " | Recent Accounting Developments
|
| " | Related Party Transactions
|
| " | Other Items
|
| " | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
| " | Business
|
| " | Our Partnership
|
| " | Our Relationship with EPCO and Enterprise Products Partners
|
| " | Our Business Strategy
|
| " | Our Competitive Strengths
|
| " | Industry Overview
|
| " | NGL & Petrochemical Storage Services Segment
|
| " | Natural Gas Pipelines & Services Segment
|
| " | Petrochemical Pipeline Services Segment
|
| " | NGL Pipeline Services Segment
|
| " | Supplies
|
| " | Employees
|
| " | Environmental Matters
|
| " | Regulation of Operations
|
| " | Title to Properties
|
| " | Legal Proceedings
|
| " | Management
|
| " | Governance Matters
|
| " | Directors and Executive Officers
|
| " | Executive Compensation
|
| " | Compensation of Directors of DEP Holdings
|
| " | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
|
| " | Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
|
| " | Related Party Transactions with Enterprise Products Partners
|
| " | Relationships with TEPPCO Partners
|
| " | Relationships with Unconsolidated Affiliate
|
| " | Contribution, Conveyance and Assumption Agreement
|
| " | Omnibus Agreement
|
| " | Mont Belvieu Caverns Limited Liability Company Agreement
|
| " | Administrative Services Agreement
|
| " | Conflicts of Interest, Business Opportunity Agreements and Fiduciary Duties
|
| " | Conflicts of Interest and Business Opportunity Agreements
|
| " | Fiduciary Duties
|
| " | Description of Our Common Units
|
| " | Transfer Agent and Registrar
|
| " | Transfer of Units
|
| " | Description of Material Provisions of Our Partnership Agreement
|
| " | Organization and Duration
|
| " | Purpose
|
| " | Power of Attorney
|
| " | Cash Distributions
|
| " | Capital Contributions
|
| " | Limited Liability
|
| " | Voting Rights
|
| " | Issuance of Additional Securities
|
| " | Amendments to Our Partnership Agreement
|
| " | Merger, Sale or Other Disposition of Assets
|
| " | Termination or Dissolution
|
| " | Liquidation and Distribution of Proceeds
|
| " | Withdrawal or Removal of Our General Partner
|
| " | Transfer of General Partner Interest
|
| " | Transfer of Ownership Interests in Our General Partner
|
| " | Change of Management Provisions
|
| " | Limited Call Right
|
| " | Meetings; Voting
|
| " | Status as Limited Partner
|
| " | Non-Citizen Assignees; Redemption
|
| " | Indemnification
|
| " | Resolution of Conflicts of Interest
|
| " | Reimbursement of Expenses
|
| " | Books and Reports
|
| " | Right to Inspect Our Books and Records
|
| " | Registration Rights
|
| " | Common Units Eligible for Future Sale
|
| " | Material Tax Consequences
|
| " | Partnership Status
|
| " | Limited Partner Status
|
| " | Tax Consequences of Unit Ownership
|
| " | Tax Treatment of Operations
|
| " | Disposition of Common Units
|
| " | Uniformity of Units
|
| " | Tax-Exempt Organizations and Other Investors
|
| " | Administrative Matters
|
| " | State, Local and Other Tax Considerations
|
| " | Selling Unitholder
|
| " | Underwriting
|
| " | Validity of the Common Units
|
| " | Experts
|
| " | Where You Can Find More Information
|
| " | Forward-Looking Statements
|
| " | Index to Financial Statements
|
| " | Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements
|
| " | Introduction
|
| " | Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Statement of Combined Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
|
| " | Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Statement of Combined Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
| " | Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet at September 30, 2006
|
| " | Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements
|
| " | Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
| " | Combined Balance Sheets at September 30, 2006, December 31, 2005 and 2004
|
| " | Statements of Combined Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited) and Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
| " | Statements of Combined Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited) and Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
| " | Statements of Combined Owners Net Investment for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
| " | Notes to Combined Financial Statements and Supplemental Schedule
|
| " | Balance Sheet at September 30, 2006
|
| " | Note to Balance Sheet
|
| " | Balance Sheet at October 31, 2006
|
| " | Appendix A Form of First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Duncan Energy Partners L.P
|
| " | Appendix B Glossary of Terms
|
This is an EDGAR HTML document rendered as filed. [ Alternative Formats ]
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
AMENDMENT NO. 3
TO
Form S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
Duncan Energy Partners
L.P.
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
4922
|
|
20-5639997
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
1100 Louisiana Street, 10th Floor
(Address, Including Zip Code,
and Telephone Number, Including
Area Code, of Registrant’s
Principal Executive Offices)
Richard H. Bachmann
1100 Louisiana Street, 10th Floor
(Name, Address, Including Zip
Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Agent for
Service)
Copies to:
| |
|
|
Robert V. Jewell
David C. Buck
Andrews Kurth LLP
600 Travis, Suite 4200
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 220-4200
|
|
Joshua Davidson
Sean T. Wheeler
Baker Botts L.L.P.
One Shell Plaza, 910 Louisiana
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 229-1234
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after this
Registration Statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities
and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said
Section 8(a), may determine.
The information in
this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed.
These securities may not be sold until the registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an
offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer
to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is
not permitted.
|
Prospectus
13,000,000 Common
Units
Representing Limited Partner
Interests
Duncan Energy Partners L.P. is a limited partnership recently
formed by Enterprise Products Partners L.P. This is the initial
public offering of our common units. We currently estimate that
the initial public offering price will be between $19.00 and
$21.00 per common unit. Before this offering, there has
been no public market for our common units. Our common units
have been approved for listing, subject to official notice of
issuance, on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
“DEP.”
Investing in our common units
involves risks. Please read “Risk Factors” beginning
on page 21.
These risks include the following:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
We may not have sufficient cash from operations to enable us to
pay distributions on our common units.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Changes in demand for and production of hydrocarbon products may
materially adversely affect our results of operations, cash
flows and financial condition.
|
| |
| |
•
|
We depend on Enterprise Products Partners L.P. and certain other
key customers for a significant portion of our revenues. The
loss of any of these key customers could result in a decline in
our revenues and cash from operations available to pay
distributions to our unitholders.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Our general partner and its affiliates, including Enterprise
Products Partners L.P., will have conflicts of interest and
limited fiduciary duties, which may permit them to favor their
own interests to your detriment.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Affiliates of our general partner, including Enterprise Products
Partners L.P., Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. and TEPPCO Partners
L.P., may compete with us and be entitled to pursue certain
business opportunities before us. This arrangement may limit our
ability to grow.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Our general partner has a limited call right that may require
you to sell your common units at an undesirable time or price.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Unitholders have limited voting rights and are not entitled to
elect our general partner or its directors.
|
| |
| |
•
|
You will experience immediate and substantial dilution of
$5.64 per unit in the net tangible book value of your
common units.
|
| |
| |
•
|
You may be required to pay taxes on income from us even if you
do not receive any cash distributions from us.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Common Unit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Initial public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Underwriting discount(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Proceeds to us (before expenses)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes a fee payable to Lehman Brothers of $1,000,000 in
consideration of advice rendered by Lehman Brothers regarding
the structure of this offering and our partnership. |
We have granted the underwriters a
30-day
option to purchase up to an additional 1,950,000 common units on
the same terms and conditions as set forth above if the
underwriters sell more than 13,000,000 common units in this
offering.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this
prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
Lehman Brothers, on behalf of the underwriters, expects to
deliver the common units on or
about ,
2007.
|
|
| Lehman
Brothers |
UBS
Investment Bank |
|
|
| Citigroup |
Goldman,
Sachs & Co. |
|
|
| Morgan
Stanley |
Wachovia
Securities |
,
2007
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. We have not, and the underwriters have not,
authorized any other person to provide you with different
information. If anyone provides you with
iii
different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on
it. We are not, and the underwriters are not, making an offer to
sell these securities in any jurisdiction where an offer or sale
is not permitted. You should assume that the information
appearing in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date on
the front cover of this prospectus. Our business, financial
condition and results of operations may have changed since that
date.
Until ,
2007 (25 days after the date of this prospectus), all
dealers that buy, sell or trade our common units, whether or not
participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers’ obligation
to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with
respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.
iv
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus. You should read the entire prospectus
carefully, including the historical and pro forma financial
statements and the notes to those financial statements. You
should read “Risk Factors” for important information
about risks that you should consider before buying our common
units. The information presented in this prospectus assumes an
initial public offering price per unit of $20.00 and that the
underwriters’ option to purchase additional common units is
not exercised, unless otherwise noted.
All references in this prospectus to “we,”
“us,” “Duncan Energy Partners,” the
“Partnership” and “our” refer to Duncan
Energy Partners L.P. and its subsidiaries. All references in
this prospectus to “we,” “us,”
“our” or the “Company,” when used in a
historical context, are intended to mean and include the
combined business and operations of Duncan Energy Partners
Predecessor. Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor reflects
ownership of 100% of the assets being contributed, but we will
own only a 66% interest in these assets after their contribution
in connection with this offering. For all references in this
prospectus to the terms “our general partner,”
“DEP Holdings,” “Enterprise Products
Partners,” “Enterprise Products OLP,”
“Enterprise Products GP,” “Enterprise GP
Holdings,” “EPE Holdings,” “EPCO,”
“Mont Belvieu Caverns,” “Acadian Gas,”
“Sabine Propylene,” “Lou-Tex Propylene,”
“South Texas NGL,” “TEPPCO Partners,”
“TEPPCO GP” and “Evangeline,” please read
Appendix B — Glossary of Terms. Please also read
Appendix B — Glossary of Terms for a glossary of
industry terms used in this prospectus.
Duncan
Energy Partners L.P.
We are a Delaware limited partnership formed by Enterprise
Products Partners in September 2006 to own, operate and acquire
a diversified portfolio of midstream energy assets. We are
engaged in the business of gathering, transporting, marketing
and storing natural gas and transporting and storing natural gas
liquids, or NGLs, and petrochemicals. Our assets were previously
owned by Enterprise Products Partners and are part of its
integrated midstream energy asset network, or
“value
chain,” which includes natural gas gathering, processing,
transportation and storage; NGL fractionation (or separation),
transportation, storage and import and export terminaling; crude
oil transportation; and offshore production platform services.
After this offering, we will own 66% of the equity interests in
the
subsidiaries that hold our operating assets, and affiliates
of Enterprise Products Partners will continue to own the
remaining 34%. We believe our relationship with Enterprise
Products Partners will enable us to maintain stable cash flows
and optimize our scale, strategic location and pipeline
connections.
Our operations are organized into the following four business
segments:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
NGL & Petrochemical Storage
Services. Our NGL & Petrochemical
Storage Services segment consists of 33 salt dome caverns
located in Mont Belvieu, Texas, with an underground storage
capacity of approximately 100 MMBbls, and certain related
assets. These assets receive, store and deliver NGLs and
petrochemical products for industrial customers located along
the upper Texas Gulf Coast, which has the largest concentration
of petrochemical plants and refineries in the United States.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Natural Gas Pipelines & Services. Our
Natural Gas Pipelines & Services segment consists of
the Acadian Gas system, which is an onshore natural gas pipeline
system that gathers, transports, stores and markets natural gas
in Louisiana. The Acadian Gas system links natural gas supplies
from onshore and offshore Gulf of Mexico developments (including
offshore pipelines, continental shelf and deepwater production)
with local gas distribution companies, electric generation
plants and industrial customers, including those in the Baton
Rouge-New Orleans-Mississippi River corridor. In the aggregate,
the Acadian Gas system includes over 1,000 miles of
high-pressure transmission lines and lateral and gathering lines
with an aggregate throughput capacity of approximately one Bcf/d
and a leased storage facility with approximately three Bcf of
storage capacity.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Petrochemical Pipeline Services. Our
Petrochemical Pipeline Services segment consists of two
petrochemical pipeline systems with an aggregate of
284 miles of pipeline. The Lou-Tex Propylene pipeline
system consists of a
263-mile
pipeline used to transport chemical-grade propylene between
|
1
|
|
|
| |
|
Sorrento, Louisiana and Mont Belvieu, Texas. The
Sabine Propylene pipeline system consists of a
21-mile
pipeline used to transport polymer-grade propylene from Port
Arthur, Texas to a pipeline interconnect in Cameron Parish,
Louisiana on a
transport-or-pay
basis.
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
NGL Pipeline Services. Our NGL Pipeline
Services segment consists of a
290-mile
pipeline system used to transport NGLs from two Enterprise
Products Partners’ facilities located in South Texas to
Mont Belvieu, Texas and related interconnections. We acquired a
223-mile
segment of the system in August 2006, and we are in the process
of acquiring and constructing other segments of the pipeline.
The system became operational and began transporting NGLs in
January 2007 after undergoing modifications, extensions and
interconnections. Additional expansions are scheduled to be
completed during the remainder of 2007.
|
Our
Relationship With Enterprise Products Partners
Enterprise Products Partners is a North American midstream
energy company that provides a wide range of services to
producers and consumers of natural gas, NGLs and crude oil.
Enterprise Products Partners’ value chain is an integrated
midstream energy asset network that links producers of natural
gas, NGLs and crude oil from some of the largest supply basins
in the United States, Canada and the Gulf of Mexico with
domestic consumers and international markets. For the year ended
December 31, 2005, Enterprise Products Partners had
revenues of $12.3 billion, operating income of
$663 million and net income of $420 million. For the
nine months ended
September 30, 2006, Enterprise Products
Partners had revenues of $10.6 billion, operating income of
$653.7 million and net income of $468.4 million. After
giving effect to this offering, we will continue to have a
number of commercial relationships, including transportation and
storage agreements, with Enterprise Products Partners and its
affiliates. In addition, in the event we propose to sell any
equity interests in our operating
subsidiaries or material
assets of those entities, other than sales of inventory and
other assets in the ordinary course of business, Enterprise
Products OLP will have a right of first refusal to purchase
those interests or assets.
We believe our relationship with EPCO and Enterprise Products
Partners will provide us access to an experienced management
team and commercial relationships throughout the energy
industry. However, this relationship is also a source of
potential conflicts. For example, Enterprise Products Partners,
EPCO and their affiliates are not restricted from competing with
us and may generally acquire, construct or dispose of midstream
or other assets in the future without any obligation to offer us
the opportunity to purchase or construct those assets or
participate in these activities. Please read “Conflicts of
Interest, Business Opportunity Agreements and Fiduciary
Duties” and “Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions” for more information on these commercial and
other relationships.
Formation
Transactions
At the closing of this offering, the following transactions will
occur:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Enterprise Products OLP will contribute to us 66% of the equity
interests in Mont Belvieu Caverns, Acadian Gas, Sabine
Propylene, Lou-Tex Propylene and South Texas NGL;
|
| |
| |
•
|
We will issue to Enterprise Products OLP 7,301,571 common units
representing an approximate 35.2% limited partner interest in us
(or an approximate 25.8% limited partner interest if the
underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase
additional common units), and we will issue a 2% general partner
interest to our general partner, DEP Holdings, LLC;
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
We will borrow approximately $200 million under our new
credit agreement, which will be used to fund a portion of our
payment to Enterprise Products Partners in connection with the
transactions described above;
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
We will sell 13,000,000 common units to the public in this
offering representing an approximate 62.8% limited partner
interest in us (or an approximate 72.2% limited partner interest
if the underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase
additional common units), and will use the net proceeds from
this offering as described under “Use of Proceeds;”
|
2
|
|
|
| |
•
|
We will become party to an existing administrative services
agreement among EPCO and certain of its affiliates;
|
| |
| |
•
|
We will enter into various new transportation, storage and
operating agreements with Enterprise Products OLP and its
affiliates; and
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
We will enter into an omnibus agreement with Enterprise Products
OLP, pursuant to which Enterprise Products OLP will agree to
(i) indemnify us for certain environmental liabilities, tax
liabilities and title and
right-of-way
defects occurring or existing before the closing and
(ii) reimburse us for our 66% share of excess construction
costs, if any, above our current estimated cost to complete
planned expansions on the South Texas NGL pipeline and Mont
Belvieu Caverns brine-related facilities. In addition, we will
grant Enterprise Products OLP a right of first refusal on
the equity interests in certain of our operating subsidiaries
and on the material assets of these entities, other than sales
of inventory and other assets in the ordinary course of
business, and a preemptive right with respect to equity
securities issued by certain of our subsidiaries, other than as
consideration in an acquisition or in connection with a loan or
debt financing.
|
Management
and Ownership
As is common with publicly traded limited partnerships and in
order to maximize operational flexibility, we will conduct our
operations through
subsidiaries.
Our general partner will manage our operations and activities.
Some of the executive officers and non-independent directors of
our general partner also serve as executive officers or
directors of Enterprise Products GP, EPE Holdings and TEPPCO GP.
Please read “Management.” Our general partner will not
receive any management fee or other compensation in connection
with its management of our business but will be entitled to be
reimbursed for all direct and indirect expenses incurred on our
behalf. Neither our general partner nor the board of directors
of our general partner will be elected by our unitholders.
Unlike shareholders in a corporation, our unitholders will not
elect or remove the board of directors of our general partner.
Our principal executive offices are located at 1100 Louisiana
Street, 10th Floor,
Houston,
Texas 77002, and our telephone
number is
(713) 381-6500.
Our
website is located at
http://www.deplp.com. Information on
our
website or any other
website is not incorporated by
reference into this prospectus and does not constitute a part of
this prospectus.
3
Our
Structure
The following diagram depicts our organizational structure after
giving effect to this offering and the related transactions
assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ option to
purchase additional common units.
Ownership
of Duncan Energy Partners L.P.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
General Partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Common Units
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Public common units
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13,000,000
|
|
|
|
62.8
|
%
|
|
Enterprise Products Partners and
its affiliates
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,301,571
|
|
|
|
35.2
|
%
|
|
General partner interest
|
|
|
414,318
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
414,318
|
|
|
|
20,301,571
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
The
Offering
|
|
|
|
Common units offered |
|
13,000,000 common units. |
| |
|
Common units subject to the underwriters’ option to
purchase additional common units |
|
If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional
units in full, we will issue 1,950,000 additional common units
to the public and redeem 1,950,000 common units from Enterprise
Products OLP, who may be deemed to be a selling unitholder in
this offering. Please read “Selling Unitholder.” |
| |
|
Common units outstanding after this offering |
|
20,301,571 common units. |
| |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We will use the net proceeds from this offering of approximately
$243.4 million (based on an assumed offering price of
$20.00 per unit), after deducting the underwriting discount and
a $1.0 million structuring fee, but before estimated
expenses associated with the offering and related formation
transactions, to: |
| |
|
|
|
• distribute approximately $212.3 million to
Enterprise Products OLP as a portion of the cash consideration
and reimbursement for capital expenditures relating to the
assets contributed to us;
|
| |
|
|
|
• provide approximately $28.2 million to fund our
share of estimated capital expenditures to complete planned
expansions to the South Texas NGL pipeline system and brine
production and above-ground storage projects at Mont Belvieu
subsequent to the closing of this offering; and |
| |
|
|
|
• pay approximately $2.9 million of other
estimated net expenses associated with this offering and related
formation transactions described on page 2. |
| |
|
|
|
In addition, we will borrow approximately $200 million
under our new $300 million credit agreement, and we will
distribute $198.9 million of these borrowings to Enterprise
Products OLP in partial consideration for the assets contributed
to us upon the closing of this offering. |
| |
|
|
|
If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional
common units, we will use all of the net proceeds from the sale
of those common units to redeem an equal number of common units
from Enterprise Products OLP. For the resulting beneficial
ownership, read “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management.” |
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions |
|
We will make initial quarterly distributions of $0.40 per
common unit to the extent we have sufficient cash from
operations after establishment of cash reserves and payment of
fees and expenses, including reimbursement of expenses to our
general partner. Our ability to pay cash distributions at this
initial distribution rate is subject to various restrictions and
other factors described in more detail under the caption
“Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on
Distributions.” We must distribute all of our cash on hand
at the end of each quarter, less reserves established by our
general partner. |
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
We refer to this cash as “available cash,” and we
define its meaning in our partnership agreement as summarized in
“How We Make Cash Distributions — Distributions
of Available Cash — Definition of Available
Cash.” The amount of available cash may be greater than or
less than the aggregate amount associated with payment of the
expected initial quarterly distribution on all common units. In
general, we will pay 98% of any cash distributions we make each
quarter to our unitholders and the remaining 2% to our general
partner. |
| |
|
|
|
Unlike many publicly traded limited partnerships, our general
partner is not entitled to any incentive distributions and we do
not have any subordinated units. |
| |
|
|
|
We believe that, based on the assumptions and considerations
described in “Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on
Distributions — Assumptions and Considerations,”
we will have sufficient available cash to pay the full initial
quarterly distribution on all our common units and our general
partner interest for each quarter during the four quarters
ending December 31, 2007. We estimate that our pro forma
available cash for the year ended December 31, 2005 would
have been sufficient to pay only 30% of the initial quarterly
distributions on our common units and our general partner
interest during that period. We estimate that our pro forma
available cash for the four quarters ended September 30,
2006 would not have been sufficient to pay any distributions on
our common units and our general partner interest. |
| |
|
|
|
We will pay investors in this offering a prorated distribution
for the first quarter during which we are a publicly traded
partnership. This distribution will be paid for the period
beginning on the first day our common units are publicly traded
and ending on the last day of that fiscal quarter. Therefore, we
will pay investors in this offering a distribution for the
period from the closing date of this offering to and including
March 31, 2007. We expect to pay this cash distribution on
or about May 15, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Limited call right |
|
If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own 80% or
more of our outstanding common units, our general partner has
the right, but not the obligation, to purchase all of the
remaining common units at a price not less than the then-current
market price of the common units. |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of additional units |
|
We can issue an unlimited number of units without the consent of
our unitholders. Please read “Common Units Eligible For
Future Sale” and “Description of Material Provisions
of Our Partnership Agreement — Issuance of Additional
Securities.” |
| |
|
Limited voting rights |
|
Our general partner will manage all of our operations. Unlike
the holders of common stock of a corporation, you will have only
limited voting rights on matters affecting our business and you
will have no right to elect our general partner or its officers
or directors. Our general partner may not be removed except by a
vote of the holders of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding common units, including common units owned by
our general partner and its affiliates. Upon completion of this
offering, affiliates of our |
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
general partner will own approximately 36.0% of our outstanding
common units (or approximately 26.4% of our outstanding common
units if the underwriters’ option to purchase additional
common units is exercised in full). Please read
“Description of Material Provisions of Our Partnership
Agreement — Withdrawal or Removal of Our General
Partner.” |
|
|
|
|
Estimated ratio of taxable income to distributions |
|
We estimate that if you own the common units you purchase in
this offering through the record date for distributions for the
period ending December 31, 2009, you will be allocated, on
a cumulative basis, an amount of federal taxable income for that
period that will be less than 20% of the cash distributed with
respect to that period. For example, if you receive an annual
distribution of $1.60 per common unit, we estimate that
your average allocated federal taxable income per year will be
no more than $0.32 per common unit. Please read
“Material Tax Consequences” in this prospectus for the
basis of this estimate. |
|
|
|
|
Material tax consequences |
|
For a discussion of other material federal income tax
consequences that may be relevant to prospective unitholders who
are individual citizens or residents of the United States,
please read “Material Tax Consequences.” |
|
|
|
|
Exchange listing |
|
Our common units have been approved for listing, subject to
official notice of issuance, on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol “DEP.” |
7
Summary
of Conflicts of Interest, Business Opportunity Agreements and
Fiduciary Duties
The following diagram summarizes the current organizational
structure of EPCO, affiliates of Dan L. Duncan and our
affiliates at
December 31, 2006.
General. Conflicts of interest exist and may
arise in the future as a result of the relationships among us,
Enterprise Products Partners, Enterprise GP Holdings, TEPPCO
Partners and our and their respective general partners and
affiliates. Our general partner is controlled indirectly by
Enterprise Products Partners. Mr. Dan L. Duncan has the
ability to elect, remove and replace the directors and officers
of our general partner and the general partners of Enterprise
Products Partners, Enterprise GP Holdings and TEPPCO Partners.
The assets of Enterprise Products Partners, Enterprise GP
Holdings, TEPPCO Partners and us overlap in certain areas, which
may result in various conflicts of interest in the future.
The directors and officers of our general partner have fiduciary
duties to manage our business in a manner beneficial to us and
our partners. Some of the executive officers and non-independent
directors of our general partner also serve as executive
officers or directors of Enterprise Products GP, EPE Holdings
and TEPPCO GP. As a result, they have fiduciary duties to manage
the business of each of those entities in a manner beneficial to
such entities and their respective partners. Consequently, these
directors and officers may
8
encounter situations in which their fiduciary obligations to
Enterprise Products Partners, Enterprise GP Holdings or TEPPCO
Partners, on the one hand, and us, on the other hand, are in
conflict. For a more detailed description of the conflicts of
interest involving our general partner, please read
“Conflicts of Interest, Business Opportunity Agreements and
Fiduciary Duties.”
It is not possible to predict the nature or extent of these
potential future conflicts of interest at this time, nor is it
possible to determine how we will address and resolve any such
future conflicts of interest. However, the resolution of these
conflicts may not always be in our best interest or that of our
unitholders.
Business Opportunity Agreements under our Administrative
Services Agreement. At or prior to the closing of
this offering, we and our general partner will become party to
an existing administrative services agreement with EPCO,
Enterprise Products Partners and its general partner, Enterprise
GP Holdings and its general partner, TEPPCO Partners and its
general partner, and certain affiliated entities. The
administrative services agreement will address potential
conflicts that may arise among us and our general partner,
Enterprise Products Partners and its general partner, Enterprise
GP Holdings and its general partner, TEPPCO Partners and its
general partner, and the EPCO Group, which includes EPCO and its
affiliates but does not include the aforementioned entities and
their controlled affiliates.
The administrative services agreement will provide, among other
things, that:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
if a business opportunity to acquire certain equity securities
(which we define to include general partner interests in
publicly traded partnerships and similar interests and any
associated incentive distribution rights, limited partner
interests or similar interests owned by the owner of such
general partner interest or its affiliates), is presented to the
EPCO Group, us, and our general partner, Enterprise Products
Partners and its general partner, or Enterprise GP Holdings and
its general partner, Enterprise GP Holdings will have the first
right to pursue the acquisition. In the event that Enterprise GP
Holdings abandons the acquisition, Enterprise Products Partners
will have the second right to pursue such acquisition either for
itself or, if desired by Enterprise Products Partners in its
sole discretion, for our benefit. In the event that Enterprise
Products Partners affirmatively directs the acquisition to us,
we may pursue such acquisition. In the event that Enterprise
Products Partners abandons the acquisition for itself and for
us, the EPCO Group may pursue the acquisition without any
further obligation to any other party or offer such opportunity
to other affiliates; and
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
if any business opportunity not covered by the preceding bullet
point is presented to the EPCO Group, us and our general
partner, Enterprise Products Partners and its general partner,
or Enterprise GP Holdings and its general partner, Enterprise
Products Partners will have the first right to pursue such
opportunity either for itself or, if desired by Enterprise
Products Partners in its sole discretion, for our benefit. In
the event that Enterprise Products Partners affirmatively
directs the business opportunity to us, we may pursue such
business opportunity. In the event Enterprise Products Partners
abandons the business opportunity for itself and for us,
Enterprise GP Holdings will have the second right to pursue such
business opportunity. In the event Enterprise GP Holdings
abandons the business opportunity, the EPCO Group may pursue the
business opportunity without any further obligation to any other
party or offer such opportunity to other affiliates.
|
None of the EPCO Group, we and our general partner, Enterprise
Products Partners and its general partner, or Enterprise GP
Holdings and its general partner will have any obligation to
present business opportunities to TEPPCO Partners, its general
partner or their controlled affiliates, nor will TEPPCO
Partners, its general partner or their controlled affiliates
have any obligation to present business opportunities to the
EPCO Group, us and our general partner, Enterprise Products
Partners and its general partner, or Enterprise GP Holdings and
its general partner. For a more detailed description of these
provisions, please read “Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions — Administrative Services
Agreement.”
Shared Personnel. DEP Holdings, as our general
partner, will manage our operations and activities. Under the
administrative services agreement, EPCO will provide all
employees and administrative, operational and other services for
us. All of our general partner’s executive officers will,
and certain other EPCO employees assigned to our operations may,
also perform services for EPCO, Enterprise Products Partners,
9
Enterprise GP Holdings, TEPPCO Partners and their affiliates.
The services performed by these shared personnel will generally
be limited to non-commercial functions, including but not
limited to human resources, information technology, financial
and accounting services and legal services. We have adopted
policies and procedures intended to protect and prevent
inappropriate disclosure by shared personnel of commercial and
other non-public information relating to us, EPCO, Enterprise
Products Partners, Enterprise GP Holdings and TEPPCO Partners.
Because our general partner’s executive officers allocate
time among EPCO, us, Enterprise Products Partners, Enterprise GP
Holdings and TEPPCO Partners, these officers face conflicts
regarding the allocation of their time, which may adversely
affect our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Compensation Arrangements. Dan L. Duncan, as
the control person of EPCO, our general partner and the general
partners of Enterprise Products Partners, Enterprise GP Holdings
and TEPPCO Partners, is responsible for establishing the
compensation arrangements for all EPCO employees, including
employees who provide services to us, Enterprise Products
Partners, Enterprise GP Holdings and TEPPCO Partners.
Fiduciary Duties. Our partnership agreement
limits the liability and reduces the fiduciary duties of our
general partner and its affiliates to our unitholders. Our
partnership agreement also restricts the remedies available to
unitholders for actions that might otherwise constitute a breach
of our general partner’s and its affiliates’ fiduciary
duty owed to unitholders. By purchasing our common units, you
are treated as having consented to various actions contemplated
in the partnership agreement and conflicts of interest that
might otherwise constitute a breach of fiduciary or other duties
under applicable state law. Please read “Conflicts of
Interest, Business Opportunity Agreements and Fiduciary
Duties — Fiduciary Duties” for a description of
the fiduciary duties imposed on our general partner by Delaware
law, the material modifications of these duties contained in our
partnership agreement and certain legal rights and remedies
available to unitholders.
For a description of our other relationships with our
affiliates, please read “Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions.”
10
Summary
of Certain Risk Factors
An investment in our common units involves risks associated with
our business, our partnership structure and the tax
characteristics of our common units. The following list of risk
factors is not exhaustive. For more information about these and
other risks, please read “Risk Factors” beginning on
page 21. These risks include, among others:
Risks
Inherent in Our Business
|
|
|
| |
•
|
We may not have sufficient cash from operations to enable us to
pay our expected initial quarterly distribution on our common
units.
|
| |
| |
•
|
A decrease in demand for natural gas, NGLs, NGL products or
petrochemical products by the petrochemical, refining or heating
industries could materially adversely affect our results of
operations, cash flows and financial position.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Because of the natural decline in gas production from existing
wells, our success depends on our ability to obtain access to
new sources of natural gas, which is dependent on factors beyond
our control. Any decrease in supplies of natural gas could
adversely affect our business and operating results.
|
| |
| |
•
|
A natural disaster, catastrophe or other event could result in
severe personal injury, property damage and environmental
damage, which could curtail our operations and otherwise
materially adversely affect our cash flow and, accordingly,
affect the market price of our common units.
|
| |
| |
•
|
We may not be able to make acquisitions or to make acquisitions
on economically acceptable terms, which may limit our ability to
grow.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Federal, state or local regulatory measures could materially
adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows
and financial condition.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Environmental costs and liabilities and changing environmental
regulation could materially affect our results of operations,
cash flows and financial condition.
|
| |
| |
•
|
We depend on Enterprise Products Partners and certain other key
customers for a significant portion of our revenues. The loss of
any of these key customers could result in a decline in our
revenues and cash available to pay distributions to you.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Successful development of LNG import terminals outside our areas
of operations could reduce the demand for our services.
|
| |
| |
•
|
We do not own all of the land on which our pipelines and
facilities are located, which could disrupt our operations.
|
Risks
Inherent in an Investment in Us
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Affiliates of our general partner, including Enterprise Products
Partners, Enterprise GP Holdings and TEPPCO Partners, may
compete with us, and business opportunities may be directed by
contract to Enterprise Products Partners and Enterprise GP
Holdings before us under the administrative services agreement.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Our general partner and its affiliates own a controlling
interest in us and have conflicts of interest and limited
fiduciary duties, which may permit them to favor their own
interests to your detriment.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Our general partner has a limited call right that may require
you to sell your common units at an undesirable time or price.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Our partnership agreement limits our general partner’s
fiduciary duties to unitholders and restricts the remedies
available to unitholders for actions taken by our general
partner that might otherwise constitute breaches of fiduciary
duty.
|
11
|
|
|
| |
•
|
An affiliate of Enterprise Products Partners will have the power
to appoint and remove our directors and management.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Unitholders have limited voting rights and are not entitled to
elect our general partner or its directors, which could lower
the trading price of our common units.
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
You will experience immediate and substantial dilution of
$5.64 per common unit.
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
We may issue additional units without your approval, which would
dilute your ownership interests.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Cost reimbursements to EPCO and its affiliates will reduce cash
available for distribution to you.
|
Tax
Risks
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Our tax treatment depends on our status as a partnership for
federal income tax purposes, as well as our not being subject to
a material amount of entity-level taxation by individual states.
If the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, were to treat us as
a corporation or if we were to become subject to entity-level
taxation for state tax purposes, then our cash distributions to
you would be substantially reduced.
|
| |
| |
•
|
If the IRS contests the federal income tax positions we take,
the market for our common units may be adversely impacted, and
the costs of any contest will reduce our cash distributions to
you.
|
| |
| |
•
|
You may be required to pay taxes on your share of our income
even if you do not receive any cash distributions from us.
|
12
Summary
Historical and Pro Forma Financial and Operating Data
Duncan Energy Partners L.P. was formed on
September 29, 2006; therefore, it does not have any
historical financial statements prior to its formation. The
following tables set forth, for the periods and at the dates
indicated, the summary historical combined financial and
operating data of Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor, which was
derived from the books and records of Enterprise Products
Partners.
The summary historical combined financial data for the nine
months ended
September 30, 2006 and for the years ended
December 31, 2005,
2004 and
2003 and combined balance sheet
data at
September 30, 2006 and at
December 31, 2005
and
2004 is derived from and should be read in conjunction with
the audited combined financial statements of Duncan Energy
Partners Predecessor included elsewhere in this prospectus
beginning on
page F-13.
The summary historical combined financial data for the nine
months ended
September 30, 2005 and combined balance sheet
data at
September 30, 2005 is derived from the unaudited
condensed combined financial statements of Duncan Energy
Partners Predecessor. The operating data for all periods are
unaudited. The summary unaudited pro forma combined financial
data of Duncan Energy Partners was derived from and should be
read in conjunction with our unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements included in this prospectus
beginning on
page F-2.
The following information should also be read together with the
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.”
Enterprise Products Partners, through its
subsidiaries, has
owned controlling interests and operated the underlying assets
of Mont Belvieu Caverns, Acadian Gas, Lou-Tex Propylene and
Sabine Propylene for several years. Enterprise Products Partners
will retain a 34% ownership interest in each of these four
entities (as well as South Texas NGL). Enterprise Products
Partners will own our general partner, DEP Holdings, which owns
a 2% general partner interest in us, and therefore indirectly
has the ability to control us. In addition, Enterprise Products
Partners will own approximately 36.0% of our common units after
completion of this offering, or approximately 26.4% of our
outstanding common units if the underwriters exercise their
option to purchase additional common units in full. For
financial reporting purposes, the ownership interests of
Enterprise Products Partners are deemed to represent the parent
(or sponsor) interest in our pro forma results of our operations
and financial position.
The summary unaudited pro forma combined financial data for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and for the year ended
December 31, 2005 assume the pro forma transactions noted
herein occurred at the beginning of each period presented or on
September 30, 2006 for the balance sheet data. These
transactions include:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
The August 2006 purchase of a pipeline by Enterprise Products
Partners for approximately $97.7 million in cash, the
subsequent contribution of this pipeline to South Texas NGL, and
estimated additional costs of $37.7 million required to
modify this pipeline and to acquire and construct additional
pipelines in order to place this system into operation in
January 2007. The pro forma financial data does not reflect
estimated additional capital expenditures of $28.6 million
that will be made by South Texas NGL in 2007 to complete planned
expansions to this system. We will retain cash in an amount
equal to our 66% share (approximately $18.9 million)
of these estimated capital expenditures from the net proceeds of
this offering in order to fund our share of the planned
expansion costs. The pro forma combined results of operations
data does not reflect any results attributable to the historical
activities of this pipeline.
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
The expenditure of $21.3 million in connection with the
construction of additional brine production capacity and
above-ground storage reservoirs at Mont Belvieu. The pro forma
financial data does not reflect estimated additional capital
expenditures of $14.1 million that will be made by Mont
Belvieu Caverns subsequent to December 31, 2006 to complete
these projects. We will retain cash in an amount equal to our
66% share (approximately $9.3 million) of these
additional capital expenditures from the net proceeds of this
offering in order to fund our share of the planned expansion
costs.
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
The contribution of a 66% interest in certain entities, which
are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Enterprise Products Partners,
and the retention by Enterprise Products Partners of a 34%
interest in these entities.
|
13
|
|
|
| |
•
|
The revision of related party storage contracts between us and
Enterprise Products Partners to (1) increase certain
storage fees paid by Enterprise Products Partners and
(2) reflect the allocation to Enterprise Products Partners
of all storage measurement gains and losses relating to products
under these agreements, and the execution of a limited liability
company agreement for Mont Belvieu Caverns providing for the
special allocation and other agreements relating to other
measurement gains and losses to Enterprise Products Partners.
|
| |
| |
•
|
The assignment to us of certain third-party agreements that
effectively reduce tariff rates received by us for the transport
of propylene volumes.
|
Our unaudited pro forma, as adjusted financial data also gives
effect to the following:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
our borrowing of $200 million under a new revolving credit
facility;
|
| |
| |
•
|
our issuance and sale of 13,000,000 common units to the public
in this offering;
|
| |
| |
•
|
our payment of estimated underwriting discounts and commissions,
a structuring fee and other offering expenses; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
our use of net proceeds from the borrowing and this offering as
consideration for the contributed ownership interests in Mont
Belvieu Caverns, Acadian Gas, Lou-Tex Propylene, Sabine
Propylene and South Texas NGL from Enterprise Products Partners.
|
14
The following table presents the summary historical combined
financial and operating data of Duncan Energy Partners
Predecessor and our summary unaudited pro forma combined
financial information for the annual periods indicated (dollars
in thousands, except per unit amounts):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan Energy Partners L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Pro
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Forma
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Results of Operations
Data:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
668,234
|
|
|
$
|
748,931
|
|
|
$
|
953,397
|
|
|
$
|
946,568
|
|
|
$
|
946,568
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
609,774
|
|
|
|
685,544
|
|
|
|
909,044
|
|
|
|
905,989
|
|
|
|
905,989
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6,138
|
|
|
|
5,442
|
|
|
|
4,483
|
|
|
|
6,983
|
|
|
|
6,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
615,912
|
|
|
|
690,986
|
|
|
|
913,527
|
|
|
|
912,972
|
|
|
|
912,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of unconsolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
52,453
|
|
|
|
58,176
|
|
|
|
40,201
|
|
|
|
33,927
|
|
|
|
33,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(13,807
|
)
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(13,807
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before parent interest
|
|
|
52,454
|
|
|
|
58,124
|
|
|
|
39,669
|
|
|
|
33,395
|
|
|
|
20,120
|
|
|
Parent’s share of income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,274
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
52,454
|
|
|
|
58,124
|
|
|
|
39,669
|
|
|
$
|
33,395
|
|
|
$
|
5,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
52,454
|
|
|
$
|
58,124
|
|
|
$
|
39,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per unit —
public, basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Balance Sheet Data (at
period end):(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
581,816
|
|
|
$
|
590,487
|
|
|
$
|
642,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners’ net investment
|
|
|
524,127
|
|
|
|
509,719
|
|
|
|
527,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Combined Financial
Data:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by
operating activities
|
|
$
|
64,732
|
|
|
$
|
79,463
|
|
|
$
|
40,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing
activities
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
6,931
|
|
|
|
19,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in (provided by)
financing activities (2)
|
|
|
64,392
|
|
|
|
72,532
|
|
|
|
21,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross operating margin
|
|
|
76,473
|
|
|
|
81,985
|
|
|
|
64,142
|
|
|
$
|
60,368
|
|
|
$
|
60,368
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
70,336
|
|
|
|
76,498
|
|
|
|
59,072
|
|
|
|
53,380
|
|
|
|
39,106
|
|
|
Operating
Data:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Pipelines &
Services, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas throughput volumes
(Bbtus/d)
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
Petrochemical Pipeline Services,
net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petrochemical transportation
volumes (MBbls/d)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
15
The following table presents the summary historical combined
financial and operating data of Duncan Energy Partners
Predecessor and our summary unaudited pro forma combined
financial information for the interim periods indicated (dollars
in thousands, except per unit amounts):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan Energy
|
|
|
Duncan Energy Partners L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
Partners Predecessor
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Pro
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Forma
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Results of Operations
Data:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
649,404
|
|
|
$
|
740,102
|
|
|
$
|
733,434
|
|
|
$
|
733,434
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
614,328
|
|
|
|
697,979
|
|
|
|
696,511
|
|
|
|
696,511
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
3,799
|
|
|
|
2,469
|
|
|
|
4,344
|
|
|
|
4,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
618,127
|
|
|
|
700,448
|
|
|
|
700,855
|
|
|
|
700,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of unconsolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
31,557
|
|
|
|
40,278
|
|
|
|
33,203
|
|
|
|
33,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,930
|
)
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(9,924
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income
taxes and parent interest
|
|
|
31,557
|
|
|
|
40,284
|
|
|
|
33,209
|
|
|
|
23,279
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before parent interest
|
|
|
31,557
|
|
|
|
40,263
|
|
|
|
33,188
|
|
|
|
23,258
|
|
|
Parent’s share of net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,733
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
31,557
|
|
|
|
40,263
|
|
|
$
|
33,188
|
|
|
$
|
7,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
31,557
|
|
|
$
|
40,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per unit —
public, basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Balance Sheet Data (at
period end):(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
617,402
|
|
|
$
|
747,155
|
|
|
$
|
799,675
|
|
|
$
|
828,963
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
Parent’s interest in the
Partnership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305,233
|
|
|
Owners’ net investment
|
|
|
520,727
|
|
|
|
662,131
|
|
|
|
716,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners’ equity —
public
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,520
|
|
|
Other Combined Financial
Data:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by
operating activities
|
|
$
|
37,226
|
|
|
$
|
62,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing
activities
|
|
|
16,669
|
|
|
|
58,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in financing
activities(2)
|
|
|
20,557
|
|
|
|
4,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross operating margin
|
|
|
49,611
|
|
|
|
58,198
|
|
|
$
|
52,998
|
|
|
$
|
52,998
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
45,810
|
|
|
|
55,761
|
|
|
|
48,677
|
|
|
|
32,944
|
|
|
Operating
Data:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Pipelines &
Services, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas throughput volumes
(Bbtus/d)
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
Petrochemical Pipeline Services,
net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petrochemical transportation
volumes (MBbls/d)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
The non-GAAP financial measures of gross operating margin and
earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and
amortization, which we refer to as “EBITDA,” are
presented in the summary historical financial data for Duncan
Energy Partners Predecessor and in our pro forma financial data.
For a description of these non-GAAP financial measures and
reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to their
most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, please read
“— Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”
16
The following information is provided to highlight significant
trends and other information regarding Duncan Energy Partners
Predecessor’s historical operating results, financial
position and other financial data. Each section below represents
a footnote to the tables above:
(1) We view the combined financial data of Duncan Energy
Partners Predecessor from the financial statements of Mont
Belvieu Caverns, Acadian Gas, Lou-Tex Propylene and Sabine
Propylene, which were derived from the accounts and records of
Enterprise Products Partners. Enterprise Products Partners did
not own certain of the businesses for all periods presented in
this section. As a result, the summary selected data reflects
the following information:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Enterprise Products Partners owned Mont Belvieu Caverns and
Lou-Tex Propylene for all periods presented. Our pro forma
balance sheet data reflects assumed capital expenditures of
$21.3 million by Mont Belvieu Caverns in connection with
the construction of additional brine production capacity and
above-ground storage reservoirs. Our pro forma financial data
does not reflect estimated additional capital expenditures of
$14.1 million that will be made by Mont Belvieu Caverns
subsequent to December 31, 2006 to complete these projects.
We will retain cash in an amount equal to our 66% share
(approximately $9.3 million) of these additional capital
expenditures from the net proceeds of this offering in order to
fund our share of the planned expansion costs.
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Enterprise Products Partners acquired Acadian Gas in April 2001;
therefore, the selected data includes Acadian Gas from the date
of its acquisition. No financial data was available from the
seller for periods prior to April 2001.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Enterprise Products Partners constructed the pipeline owned by
Sabine Propylene and placed it in service in November 2001;
therefore, the selected data includes Sabine Propylene from
November 2001 to present.
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
In August 2006, Enterprise Products Partners purchased a
223-mile
pipeline extending from Corpus Christi, Texas to Pasadena, Texas
from ExxonMobil Pipeline Company. The total purchase price for
this asset was approximately $97.7 million in cash. This
pipeline system will be owned by South Texas NGL (along with
others being constructed and to be acquired) and will be used to
transport NGLs from two Enterprise Products Partners’
facilities located in South Texas to Mont Belvieu, Texas. The
total estimated cost to acquire and construct the additional
pipelines is $66.3 million. Our pro forma balance sheet
data reflects assumed capital expenditures of
$37.7 million, including approximately $8 million
spent to acquire a
10-mile
pipeline from an affiliate of TEPPCO Partners, to make this
pipeline system operational in January 2007. We expect that it
will cost an additional $28.6 million to complete planned
expansions of the South Texas NGL pipeline after the closing of
this offering, of which our 66% share will be approximately
$18.9 million. This expenditure is not reflected in the pro
forma financial data because we expect to use cash on hand from
the proceeds of this offering to fund this cost.
|
Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor’s historical financial
information does not reflect any transactions related to the NGL
pipeline asset acquired in August 2006 or subsequent capital
expenditures for the construction and acquisition of related
pipelines. Furthermore, the pro forma adjustments are limited to
those required to present an estimate of owners’ net
investment immediately prior to this offering. The pro forma
results of operations data does not reflect any results
attributable to the historical activities of these NGL pipelines.
ExxonMobil has informed us that no discrete and separable
financial information existed for the pipeline we acquired in
August 2006, which was comprised of two separately operated
pipelines prior to our purchase. The seller had previously
utilized these pipelines for a different product and the
pipeline was out of service when we acquired it. The
10-mile
pipeline acquired from an affiliate of TEPPCO Partners was used
as a feeder line for NGL products and operated by different
management. We understand no financial statement information is
available for this minor component asset. There is no meaningful
financial data available regarding the prior use of these
pipelines by the sellers that would be meaningful to our
investors. In addition, such data, if available, would not
assist investors in understanding either the evolution of the
business (which is a new NGL transportation network) nor the
track record of management (which will be different).
17
(2) Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor operated within the
Enterprise Products Partners cash management program for all
periods presented. Cash flows used in financing activities
represent transfers of excess cash from Duncan Energy Partners
Predecessor to Enterprise Products Partners equal to cash
provided by operations less cash used in investing activities.
Conversely, cash flows provided by financing activities
represent contributions from Enterprise Products Partners.
For additional information regarding our combined results of
operations and liquidity and capital resources, please read
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.”
Non-GAAP Financial
Measures
We include in this prospectus the non-GAAP financial measures of
gross operating margin and EBITDA, and provide reconciliations
of these non-GAAP measures to their most directly comparable
measure or measures calculated and presented in accordance with
GAAP.
Gross operating margin. We evaluate segment
performance based on the non-GAAP financial measure of gross
operating margin. Gross operating margin (total and by segment)
is an important performance measure of the core profitability of
our operations. This measure forms the basis of our internal
financial reporting and is used by senior management in deciding
how to allocate capital resources among business segments. We
believe that investors benefit from having access to the same
financial measures that our management uses in evaluating
segment results. The GAAP measure most directly comparable to
total segment gross operating margin is operating income. Our
non-GAAP financial measure of total segment gross operating
margin should not be considered as an alternative to GAAP
operating income.
We define total (or combined) segment gross operating margin as
operating income before: (1) depreciation, amortization and
accretion expense; (2) gains and losses on the sale of
assets; and (3) general and administrative expenses. Gross
operating margin is exclusive of other income and expense
transactions, provision for income taxes, minority interest,
extraordinary charges and the cumulative effect of changes in
accounting principles. Gross operating margin by segment is
calculated by subtracting segment operating costs and expenses
(net of the adjustments noted above) from segment revenues, with
both segment totals before the elimination of any intersegment
and intrasegment transactions. Our combined revenues reflect the
elimination of all material intercompany transactions.
We include equity earnings from Evangeline, a subsidiary of
Acadian Gas, in our measurement of the Natural Gas
Pipelines & Services segment gross operating margin and
operating income. Our equity investments in midstream energy
operations such as those conducted by Evangeline are a vital
component of our long-term business strategy and important to
the operations of Acadian Gas. This method of operation enables
us to achieve favorable economies of scale relative to our level
of investment and also lowers our exposure to business risks
compared the profile we would have on a stand-alone basis. Our
equity investments are within the same industry as our combined
operations; therefore, we believe treatment of earnings from our
equity method investee as a component of gross operating margin
and operating income is appropriate.
EBITDA. We define EBITDA as net income or loss
plus interest expense, provision for income taxes and
depreciation, accretion and amortization expense. EBITDA is
commonly used as a supplemental financial measure by management
and by external users of our financial statements, such as
investors, commercial banks, research analysts and rating
agencies, to assess: (1) the financial performance of our
assets without regard to financing methods, capital structures
or historical cost basis; (2) the ability of our assets to
generate cash sufficient to pay interest cost and support our
indebtedness; (3) our operating performance and return on
capital as compared to those of other companies in the midstream
energy industry, without regard to financing and capital
structure; and (4) the viability of projects and the
overall rates of return on alternative investment opportunities.
Because EBITDA excludes some, but not all, items that affect net
income or loss and because these measures may vary among other
companies, the EBITDA data presented in this prospectus may not
be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.
The GAAP measure most directly comparable to EBITDA is net cash
provided by operating activities.
18
The following tables present (1) a reconciliation of the
non-GAAP financial measure of gross operating margin to the GAAP
financial measure of operating income and (2) a
reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure of EBITDA to
the GAAP financial measure of net income (income from continuing
operations with regards to our pro forma information) on a
historical and pro forma basis, as applicable, for each of the
periods presented (dollars in thousands). With regards to EBITDA
measures determined using the historical financial information
of Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor, EBITDA is also reconciled
to the GAAP financial measure of net cash provided by operating
activities.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan Energy Partners L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Pro
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Forma
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of GAAP
“operating income” to non-GAAP “gross operating
margin”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
52,453
|
|
|
$
|
58,176
|
|
|
$
|
40,201
|
|
|
$
|
33,927
|
|
|
$
|
33,927
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile
operating income to gross operating margin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and
accretion in operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
17,882
|
|
|
|
18,374
|
|
|
|
19,453
|
|
|
|
19,453
|
|
|
|
19,453
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets in
operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
General and administrative costs
|
|
|
6,138
|
|
|
|
5,442
|
|
|
|
4,483
|
|
|
|
6,983
|
|
|
|
6,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross operating margin
|
|
$
|
76,473
|
|
|
$
|
81,985
|
|
|
$
|
64,142
|
|
|
$
|
60,368
|
|
|
$
|
60,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of non-GAAP
“EBITDA” to GAAP “net income” (or GAAP
“income from continuing operations” with respect to
pro forma data) and GAAP “net cash provided by operating
activities”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (income from continuing
operations with respect to pro forma data)
|
|
$
|
52,454
|
|
|
$
|
58,124
|
|
|
$
|
39,087
|
|
|
$
|
33,395
|
|
|
$
|
5,846
|
|
|
Additions to income to derive
EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
13,807
|
|
|
Depreciation, accretion and
amortization
|
|
|
17,882
|
|
|
|
18,374
|
|
|
|
19,453
|
|
|
|
19,453
|
|
|
|
19,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
70,336
|
|
|
$
|
76,498
|
|
|
$
|
59,072
|
|
|
$
|
53,380
|
|
|
$
|
39,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to EBITDA to derive
net cash provided by operating activities (add or subtract as
indicated by sign of number):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of unconsolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair market value of
financial instruments
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of changes in operating
accounts
|
|
|
(5,475
|
)
|
|
|
3,198
|
|
|
|
(18,280
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
64,732
|
|
|
$
|
79,463
|
|
|
$
|
40,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan Energy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan Energy
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Partners Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forma
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Pro
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Forma
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of GAAP
“operating income” to non-GAAP “gross operating
margin”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
31,557
|
|
|
$
|
40,278
|
|
|
$
|
33,203
|
|
|
$
|
33,203
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile
operating income to gross operating margin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and
accretion in operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
14,253
|
|
|
|
15,468
|
|
|
|
15,468
|
|
|
|
15,468
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets in
operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
General and administrative costs
|
|
|
3,799
|
|
|
|
2,469
|
|
|
|
4,344
|
|
|
|
4,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross operating margin
|
|
$
|
49,611
|
|
|
$
|
58,198
|
|
|
$
|
52,998
|
|
|
$
|
52,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of non-GAAP
“EBITDA” to GAAP “net income” (or GAAP
“income from continuing operations” with respect to
pro forma data) and GAAP “net cash provided by operating
activities”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (income from continuing
operations with respect to pro forma data)
|
|
$
|
31,557
|
|
|
$
|
40,272
|
|
|
$
|
33,188
|
|
|
$
|
7,525
|
|
|
Additions to income to derive
EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,930
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
Depreciation, accretion and
amortization
|
|
|
14,253
|
|
|
|
15,468
|
|
|
|
15,468
|
|
|
|
15,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
45,810
|
|
|
$
|
55,761
|
|
|
$
|
48,677
|
|
|
$
|
32,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to EBITDA to derive
net cash provided by operating activities (add or subtract as
indicated by sign of number):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of unconsolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
(280
|
)
|
|
|
(624
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair market value of
financial instruments
|
|
|
(355
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of changes in operating
accounts
|
|
|
(7,951
|
)
|
|
|
7,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
37,226
|
|
|
$
|
62,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
RISK
FACTORS
Limited partner interests are inherently different from the
capital stock of a corporation, although many of the business
risks to which we are subject are similar to those that would be
faced by a corporation engaged in a similar business. You should
carefully consider the following risk factors together with all
of the other information included in this prospectus in
evaluating an investment in our common units.
If any of the following risks were actually to occur, our
business, financial condition, or results of operations could be
materially adversely affected. In that case, we might not be
able to pay distributions on our common units, the trading price
of our common units could decline, and you could lose all or
part of your investment.
Risks
Inherent in Our Business
We may
not have sufficient available cash to enable us to pay our
expected initial quarterly distribution on our common units
after establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and
expenses, including reimbursement of expenses to our general
partner.
We may not have sufficient available cash each quarter to pay
our expected initial quarterly distribution. The amount of cash
we can distribute on our common units principally depends upon
the amount of cash we generate from our operations, which will
fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on, among other things:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the prices we obtain for our transportation and storage
services;
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the volumes of natural gas, NGLs and propylene our customers
transport or store;
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the prices of, level of production of, and demand for, natural
gas, propylene and NGLs in the markets we serve;
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the level of competition from other midstream energy companies,
as well as from alternative fuels;
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the level of our operating costs, including reimbursement of
expenses to our general partner; and
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
prevailing economic and market conditions.
|
In addition, the actual amount of cash we will have available
for distribution will depend on other factors such as:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the level of our capital expenditures;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the restrictions on distributions contained in our credit
agreement and our debt service requirements;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the cost of acquisitions, if any;
|
| |
| |
•
|
fluctuations in our working capital needs;
|
| |
| |
•
|
our ability to borrow to make distributions to our
unitholders; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
the amount, if any, of cash reserves established by our general
partner.
|
Please read “Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on
Distributions” for a discussion of how we determine our
available cash.
|
|
|
|
On a
pro forma historical basis, we would not have had sufficient
cash available for distributions to pay the expected initial
quarterly distribution on all common units for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and the four quarters ended
September 30, 2006.
|
The amount of available cash we will need to pay our expected
initial quarterly distribution for four quarters on the common
units and the 2% general partner interest to be outstanding
immediately after this offering is approximately
$33.1 million. Pro forma combined available cash to make
distributions generated during fiscal 2005 and the four quarters
ended
September 30, 2006 would have been approximately
$9.9 million and a deficit of $14.1 million,
respectively. These amounts would have been sufficient to allow
us
21
to pay only 30% of the initial quarterly distributions on the
common units and the 2% general partner interest during 2005.
These amounts would not have been sufficient to allow us to pay
any distributions on our common units and the general partner
interest during the four quarters ended
September 30, 2006.
For a calculation of our ability to make distributions to
unitholders based on our pro forma results in 2005 and for the
twelve months ended
September 30, 2006, as well as
estimated cash available to pay distributions for the four
quarters ending
December 31, 2007, please read
“Cash
Distribution Policy and Restrictions on Distributions.”
|
|
|
|
The
assumptions underlying our estimate of cash available for
distribution we include in our “Cash Distribution Policy
and Restrictions on Distributions” are inherently uncertain
and are subject to significant business, economic, financial,
regulatory and competitive risks and uncertainties that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those
expected.
|
Our estimate of cash available for distribution set forth in
“Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on
Distributions” is based on assumptions that are inherently
uncertain and are subject to significant business, economic,
financial, regulatory and competitive risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
estimated. Furthermore, our estimate of cash available for
distribution for the four quarters ending
December 31, 2007
is equal to the amount of available cash we need to pay the
expected initial quarterly distribution on all common units for
such quarters. If we do not achieve the estimated results, we
may not be able to pay the full expected initial quarterly
distribution or any amount on our common units, in which event
the market price of our common units may decline materially.
|
|
|
|
The
amount of cash we have available for distribution to unitholders
depends primarily on our cash flow and not solely on
profitability, which may prevent us from making cash
distributions during periods when we record net
income.
|
The amount of cash we have available for distribution depends
primarily on our cash flow, including cash flow from financial
reserves and working capital or other borrowings, and not solely
on profitability, which will be affected by non-cash items. As a
result, we may make cash distributions during periods when we
record losses and may not make cash distributions during periods
when we record net income.
|
|
|
|
Changes
in demand for and production of hydrocarbon products may
materially adversely affect our results of operations, cash
flows and financial condition.
|
We operate predominantly in the midstream energy sector which
includes transporting and storing natural gas, NGLs and
propylene. As such, our results of operations, cash flows and
financial condition may be materially adversely affected by
changes in the prices of these hydrocarbon products and by
changes in the relative price levels among these hydrocarbon
products. Changes in prices and changes in the relative price
levels may impact demand for hydrocarbon products, which in turn
may impact production and volumes transported by us and related
transportation and storage handling fees. We may also incur
price risk to the extent counterparties do not perform in
connection with our marketing of natural gas, NGLs and propylene.
In the past, the prices of natural gas have been extremely
volatile, and we expect this volatility to continue. The NYMEX
daily settlement price for natural gas for the prompt month
contract in 2004 ranged from a high of $8.75 per MMBtu to a low
of $4.57 per MMBtu. In 2005, the same index ranged from a
high of $15.38 per MMBtu to a low of $5.79 per MMBtu.
In 2006, the same index ranged from a high of $10.63 per MMBtu
to a low of $4.20 per MMBtu.
Generally, the prices of natural gas, NGLs and other hydrocarbon
products are subject to fluctuations in response to changes in
supply, demand, market uncertainty and a variety of additional
factors that are impossible to control. These factors include:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the level of domestic production and consumer product demand;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the availability of imported natural gas;
|
| |
| |
•
|
actions taken by foreign natural gas producing nations;
|
22
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the availability of transportation systems with adequate
capacity;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the availability of competitive fuels;
|
| |
| |
•
|
fluctuating and seasonal demand for natural gas and NGLs;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the impact of conservation efforts;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the extent of governmental regulation and taxation of
production; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
the overall economic environment.
|
|
|
|
|
A
decrease in demand for natural gas, NGLs, NGL products or
petrochemical products by the petrochemical, refining or heating
industries could materially adversely affect our results of
operations, cash flows and financial position.
|
A decrease in demand for natural gas, NGLs, NGL products or
petrochemical products by the petrochemical, refining or heating
industries, whether because of a general downturn in economic
conditions, reduced demand by consumers for the end products
made with products we transport, increased competition from
petroleum-based products due to pricing differences, adverse
weather conditions, increased government regulations affecting
prices and production levels of natural gas or other reasons,
could materially adversely affect our results of operations,
cash flows and financial position. For example:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Ethane. Ethane is primarily used in the
petrochemical industry as feedstock for ethylene, one of the
basic building blocks for a wide range of plastics and other
chemical products. If natural gas prices increase significantly
in relation to NGL product prices or if the demand for ethylene
falls (and, therefore, the demand for ethane by NGL producers
falls), it may be more profitable for natural gas producers to
leave the ethane in the natural gas stream to be burned as fuel
than to extract the ethane from the mixed NGL stream for sale as
an ethylene feedstock.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Propylene. Propylene is sold to petrochemical
companies for a variety of uses, principally for the production
of polypropylene. Propylene is subject to rapid and material
price fluctuations. Any downturn in the domestic or
international economy could cause reduced demand for, and an
oversupply of propylene, which could cause a reduction in the
volumes of propylene that we transport.
|
|
|
|
|
Any
decrease in supplies of natural gas could adversely affect our
business and operating results. Because of the natural decline
in gas production from existing wells, our success depends on
our ability to obtain access to new sources of natural gas,
which is dependent on factors beyond our control.
|
Over the past two years that have been reported, gas production
from state waters of the Gulf Coast region, which supplies much
of our throughput, has declined an average of approximately
2.9% from 133 Bcf for 2003 to 129 Bcf for 2004,
according to the Energy Information Administration, or EIA. We
cannot give any assurance regarding the gas production
industry’s ability to find new sources of domestic supply.
Production from existing wells and gas supply basins connected
to our pipelines will naturally decline over time, which means
that our cash flows associated with the gathering or
transportation of gas from these wells and basins will also
decline over time. The amount of natural gas reserves underlying
these wells may also be less than we anticipate, and the rate at
which production from these reserves declines may be greater
than we anticipate. Accordingly, to maintain or increase
throughput levels on our pipelines, we must continually obtain
access to new supplies of natural gas. The primary factors
affecting our ability to obtain new sources of natural gas to
our pipelines include:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the level of successful drilling activity near our pipelines;
|
| |
| |
•
|
our ability to compete for these supplies;
|
| |
| |
•
|
our ability to connect our pipelines to the suppliers;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the successful completion of new LNG facilities near our
pipelines; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
our gas quality requirements.
|
23
The level of drilling activity is dependent on economic and
business factors beyond our control. The primary factor that
impacts drilling decisions is the price of oil and natural gas.
These commodity prices reached record levels during 2006, but
current prices have declined in recent months. A sustained
decline in natural gas prices could result in a decrease in
exploration and development activities in the fields served by
our pipelines, which would lead to reduced throughput levels on
our pipelines. Other factors that impact production decisions
include producers’ capital budget limitations, the ability
of producers to obtain necessary drilling and other governmental
permits, the availability and cost of drilling rigs and other
drilling equipment, and regulatory changes. Because of these
factors, even if new natural gas reserves were discovered in
areas served by our pipelines, producers may choose not to
develop those reserves or may connect them to different
pipelines.
Imported LNG is expected to be a significant component of future
natural gas supply to the United States. Much of this increase
in LNG supplies is expected to be imported through new LNG
facilities to be developed over the next decade. Eleven LNG
projects have been approved by the FERC to be constructed in the
Gulf Coast region and an additional four LNG projects have been
proposed for the region. We cannot predict which, if any, of
these projects will be constructed. If a significant number of
these new projects fail to be developed with their announced
capacity, or there are significant delays in such development,
or if they are built in locations where they are not connected
to our systems or they do not influence sources of supply on our
systems, we may not realize expected increases in future natural
gas supply available for transportation through our systems.
If we are not able to obtain new supplies of natural gas to
replace the natural decline in volumes from existing supply
basins, or if the expected increase in natural gas supply
through imported LNG is not realized, throughput on our
pipelines would decline which could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations and
ability to make distributions to you.
In
accordance with industry practice, we do not obtain independent
evaluations of natural gas reserves dedicated to our pipeline
systems, including our South Texas NGL pipeline. Accordingly,
volumes of natural gas gathered on our pipeline systems in the
future could be less than we anticipate, which could adversely
affect our cash flow and our ability to make cash distributions
to unitholders.
In accordance with industry practice, we do not obtain
independent evaluations of natural gas reserves connected to our
pipeline systems due to the unwillingness of producers to
provide reserve information as well as the cost of such
evaluations. Accordingly, we do not have estimates of total
reserves dedicated to our systems (or to processing facilities
such as those serving Enterprise Products Partners in South
Texas) or the anticipated lives of such reserves. If the total
reserves or estimated lives of the reserves connected to our
pipeline systems, particularly in South Texas, is less than we
anticipate and we are unable to secure additional sources of
natural gas, then the volumes of natural gas gathered on our
South Texas NGL and other pipeline systems in the future could
be less than we anticipate. A decline in the volumes of natural
gas gathered on our pipeline systems could have an adverse
effect on our business, results of operations, financial
condition and our ability to make cash distributions to you.
|
|
|
|
We
will depend in large part on Enterprise Products Partners and
the continued success of its business as we operate our assets
as part of their value chain, and adverse changes in its related
businesses may reduce our revenue, earnings or cash available
for distribution.
|
We will enter into a number of
material contracts with
Enterprise Products Partners and its
subsidiaries relating to
transportation, storage and leases, and our cash flows and
financial condition will depend in large part on the continued
success of Enterprise Products Partners as we operate our assets
as part of its value chain. For example, our South Texas NGL
system revenues will depend solely on the volumes processed at
the South Texas facilities owned by Enterprise Products
Partners. Enterprise Products Partners has no obligation to
produce any volumes at these facilities. If anticipated volumes
are not processed by Enterprise Products Partners at these
facilities, our estimated revenues on this system will be
reduced.
Any adverse changes in the business of Enterprise Products
Partners, due to market conditions, sales of assets or
otherwise, or the failure of Enterprise Products Partners to
renew any of its material agreements with
24
us, could reduce our revenue, earnings or cash available for
distribution. Please read “Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions” for a summary of certain of
these agreements.
|
|
|
|
The
credit and risk profile of our general partner and its owners
could adversely affect our credit ratings and risk profile,
which could increase our borrowing costs or hinder our ability
to raise capital.
|
The credit and business risk profiles of a general partner or
owners of a general partner may be factors in credit evaluations
of a master limited partnership. This is because the general
partner controls the business activities of the partnership,
including its cash distribution policy and acquisition strategy
and business risk profile. Another factor that may be considered
is the financial condition of our general partner and its
owners, including the degree of their financial leverage and
their dependence on cash flow from the partnership to service
their indebtedness.
If we were to seek a credit rating in the future, our credit
rating may be adversely affected by the leverage of the owners
of our general partner, as credit rating agencies such as
Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and
Moody’s Investors Service may consider these entities’
leverage because of their ownership interest in and control of
us, the strong operational links between them and their
affiliates and us, and our reliance on Enterprise Products
Partners for a substantial percentage of our revenue. Any such
adverse effect on our credit rating would increase our cost of
borrowing or hinder our ability to raise money in the capital
markets, which would impair our ability to grow our business and
make distributions to unitholders.
Affiliates of Enterprise Products Partners, the indirect owner
of our general partner, have significant indebtedness
outstanding and are dependent principally on the cash
distributions from their general partner and limited partner
interests in Enterprise Products Partners, Enterprise GP
Holdings and TEPPCO Partners to service such indebtedness. Any
distributions by Enterprise Products Partners, Enterprise GP
Holdings and TEPPCO Partners to such entities will be made only
after satisfying their then current obligations to their
creditors. Although we have taken certain steps in our
organizational structure, financial reporting and contractual
relationships to reflect the separateness of us and our general
partner from the entities that control our general partner, and
other entities controlled by Dan L. Duncan, our credit ratings
and business risk profile could be adversely affected if the
ratings and risk profiles of Dan L. Duncan or the entities that
control our general partner were viewed as substantially lower
or more risky than ours.
|
|
|
|
A
natural disaster, catastrophe or other event could result in
severe personal injury, property damage and environmental
damage, which could curtail our operations and otherwise
materially adversely affect our cash flow and, accordingly,
affect the market price of our common units.
|
Some of our operations involve risks of personal injury,
property damage and environmental damage, which could curtail
our operations and otherwise materially adversely affect our
cash flow. For example, natural gas facilities operate at high
pressures, sometimes in excess of 1,100 pounds per square inch.
Pipelines may suffer inadvertent damage from construction, and
farm and utility equipment. Virtually all of our operations are
exposed to potential natural disasters, including hurricanes,
tornadoes, storms and floods. The location of our assets and our
customers’ assets in the Gulf Coast region makes them
particularly vulnerable to hurricane risk.
If one or more facilities that we own or that deliver natural
gas or other products to us are damaged by severe weather or any
other disaster, accident, catastrophe or event, our operations
could be significantly interrupted. Similar interruptions could
result from damage to production or other facilities that supply
our facilities or other stoppages arising from factors beyond
our control. These interruptions might involve significant
damage to people, property or the environment, and repairs might
take from a week or less for a minor incident to six months or
more for a major interruption. Any event that interrupts the
revenues generated by our operations, or which causes us to make
significant expenditures not covered by insurance, could reduce
our cash available for paying distributions and, accordingly,
adversely affect the market price of our common units.
EPCO maintains insurance coverage on behalf of us, although
insurance will not cover many types of interruptions that might
occur and will not cover amounts up to applicable deductibles.
As a result of market
25
conditions, premiums and deductibles for certain insurance
policies can increase substantially, and in some instances,
certain insurance may become unavailable or available only for
reduced amounts of coverage. For example, changes in the
insurance markets subsequent to the terrorist attacks on
September 11, 2001 and the hurricanes in 2005 have made it
more difficult for us to obtain certain types of coverage. As a
result, EPCO may not be able to renew existing insurance
policies on behalf of us or procure other desirable insurance on
commercially reasonable terms, if at all. If we were to incur a
significant liability for which we were not fully insured, it
could have a material adverse effect on our financial position
and results of operations. In addition, the proceeds of any such
insurance may not be paid in a timely manner and may be
insufficient if such an event were to occur.
|
|
|
|
Our
debt levels may limit our flexibility to obtain additional
financing and pursue other business opportunities.
|
At the closing of this offering, we expect to have approximately
$200 million of indebtedness outstanding under our credit
agreement and the ability to borrow up to an additional
$100 million, subject to certain conditions and
limitations, under the credit agreement. Our significant level
of indebtedness could have important consequences to us,
including:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
our ability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, for
working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other
purposes may be impaired or such financing may not be available
on favorable terms;
|
| |
| |
•
|
covenants contained in our existing and future credit and debt
arrangements will require us to meet financial tests that may
affect our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes
in our business, including possible acquisition opportunities;
|
| |
| |
•
|
we will need a substantial portion of our cash flow to make
principal and interest payments on our indebtedness, reducing
the funds that would otherwise be available for operation,
future business opportunities and distributions to
unitholders; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
our debt level will make us more vulnerable than our competitors
with less debt to competitive pressures or a downturn in our
business or the economy generally.
|
Our ability to service our indebtedness will depend upon, among
other things, our future financial and operating performance,
which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and
financial, business, regulatory and other factors, some of which
are beyond our control. If our operating results are not
sufficient to service our current or future indebtedness, we
will be forced to take actions such as reducing distributions,
reducing or delaying business activities, acquisition,
investments or capital expenditures, selling assets,
restructuring or refinancing our indebtedness, or seeking
additional equity capital or bankruptcy protection. We may not
be able to effect any of these remedies on satisfactory terms or
at all.
|
|
|
|
Our
new revolving credit facility will contain operating and
financial restrictions, including covenants and restrictions
that may be affected by events beyond our control, that may
limit our business and financing activities.
|
The operating and financial restrictions and covenants in our
credit agreement and any future financing agreements could
restrict our ability to finance future operations or capital
needs or to expand or pursue our business activities. For
example, our new credit agreement will restrict or limit our
ability to:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
make distributions if any default or event of default occurs;
|
| |
| |
•
|
incur additional indebtedness or guarantee other indebtedness;
|
| |
| |
•
|
grant liens or make certain negative pledges;
|
| |
| |
•
|
make certain loans or investments;
|
26
|
|
|
| |
•
|
make any material change to the nature of our business,
including consolidations, liquidations and dissolutions; or
|
| |
| |
•
|
enter into a merger, consolidation, sale and leaseback
transaction or sale of assets.
|
Our ability to comply with the covenants and restrictions
contained in our credit agreement may be affected by events
beyond our control, including prevailing economic, financial and
industry conditions. If market or other economic conditions
deteriorate, our ability to comply with these covenants may be
impaired. If we violate any of the restrictions, covenants,
ratios or tests in our credit agreement, a significant portion
of our indebtedness may become immediately due and payable, and
our lenders’ commitment to make further loans to us may
terminate. We might not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient
funds to make these accelerated payments.
|
|
|
|
Restrictions
in our revolving credit facility could limit our ability to make
distributions upon the occurrence of certain
events.
|
Our payment of principal and interest on our debt will reduce
cash available for distributions on our common units. Our new
credit agreement will limit our ability to make distributions
upon the occurrence of the following events, among others:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
failure to pay any principal, interest, fees, expenses or other
amounts when due;
|
| |
| |
•
|
failure of any representation or warranty to be true and correct
in any material respect;
|
| |
| |
•
|
failure to perform or otherwise comply with the covenants in the
credit agreement;
|
| |
| |
•
|
failure to pay any other material debt;
|
| |
| |
•
|
a bankruptcy or insolvency event involving us, our general
partner or any of our subsidiaries;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the entry of, and failure to pay, one or more adverse judgments
in excess of a specified amount against which enforcement
proceedings are brought or that are not stayed pending appeal;
|
| |
| |
•
|
a change in control of us;
|
| |
| |
•
|
a judgment default or a default under any material agreement if
such default could have a material adverse effect on us; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
the occurrence of certain events with respect to employee
benefit plans subject to ERISA.
|
Any subsequent refinancing of our current debt or any new debt
could have similar or more restrictive provisions. For more
information regarding our credit agreement, please read
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and
Capital Resources — New Revolving Credit
Facility.”
|
|
|
|
Increases
in interest rates could materially adversely affect our
business, results of operations, cash flows and financial
condition.
|
We have significant exposure to increases in interest rates.
After giving effect to this offering and the borrowing of
approximately $200 million under our new credit agreement,
pro forma as of
September 30, 2006, we would have
approximately $200 million of consolidated debt, of which
we expect all will be at variable interest rates. As a result,
our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition
could be materially adversely affected by significant increases
in interest rates.
An increase in interest rates may also cause a corresponding
decline in demand for equity investments, in general, and in
particular for yield-based equity investments such as our common
units. Any such reduction in demand for our common units
resulting from other more attractive investment opportunities
may cause the trading price of our common units to decline.
27
|
|
|
|
Our
hedging activities may have a material adverse effect on our
earnings, profitability, cash flows, including its ability to
make distributions, and financial condition.
|
We utilize derivative financial instruments related to the
future price of natural gas and the future price of NGLs with
the intent of reducing volatility in our cash flows due to
fluctuations in commodity prices. While our hedging activities
are designed to reduce commodity price risk, we remain exposed
to fluctuations in commodity prices to some extent. The extent
of our commodity price exposure is related largely to the
effectiveness and scope of our hedging activities. For example,
the derivative instruments we utilize are based on posted market
prices, which may differ significantly from the actual natural
gas prices or NGLs prices that we realize in our operations.
Furthermore, our hedges relate to only a portion of the volume
of our expected sales and, as a result, we will continue to have
direct commodity price exposure to the unhedged portion. Our
actual future sales may be significantly higher or lower than
estimated at the time we entered into derivative transactions
for such period. If the actual amount is higher than estimated,
we will have greater commodity price exposure than intended. If
the actual amount is lower than the amount that is subject to
our derivative financial instruments, we might be forced to
satisfy all or a portion of our derivative transactions without
the benefit of the cash flow from the sale or purchase of the
underlying physical commodity, resulting in a substantial
diminution of liquidity.
As a result of these factors, our hedging activities may not be
as effective as intended in reducing the volatility of our cash
flows, which could adversely affect our ability to make
distributions to unitholders. In addition, our hedging
activities are subject to the risks that a counterparty may not
perform its obligation under the applicable derivative
instrument, the terms of the derivative instruments are
imperfect, and our hedging procedures may not be properly
followed. We cannot assure you that the steps we take to monitor
our derivative financial instruments will detect and prevent
violations of our risk management policies and procedures,
particularly if deception or other intentional misconduct is
involved.
|
|
|
|
Our
construction of new assets is subject to regulatory,
environmental, political, legal and economic risks, which may
result in delays, increased costs or decreased cash
flows.
|
One of the connections between our South Texas NGL pipeline and
the Mont Belvieu facility is a pipeline we have leased from
TEPPCO Partners. The initial term of this lease will expire on
September 15, 2007, and if we are unable to construct our
planned replacement pipeline or extend the lease, the operations
of our South Texas NGL pipeline will be interrupted. We cannot
assure you that any construction will not be delayed due to
government permits, weather conditions or other factors beyond
our control.
In addition, one of the ways we intend to grow our business is
through the construction of new midstream energy assets. The
construction of new assets involves numerous operational,
regulatory, environmental, political and legal risks beyond our
control and may require the expenditure of significant amounts
of capital. These potential risks include, among other things,
the following:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
we may be unable to complete construction projects on schedule
or at the budgeted cost due to the unavailability of required
construction personnel or materials, accidents, weather
conditions or an inability to obtain necessary permits;
|
| |
| |
•
|
we will not receive any material increases in revenues until the
project is completed, even though we may have expended
considerable funds during the construction phase, which may be
prolonged;
|
| |
| |
•
|
we may construct facilities to capture anticipated future growth
in production in a region in which such growth does not
materialize;
|
| |
| |
•
|
since we are not engaged in the exploration for and development
of natural gas reserves, we may not have access to third-party
estimates of reserves in an area prior to our constructing
facilities in the area. As a result, we may make construct
facilities in an area where the reserves are materially lower
than we anticipate;
|
28
|
|
|
| |
•
|
where we do rely on third-party estimates of reserves in making
a decision to construct facilities, these estimates may prove to
be inaccurate because there are numerous uncertainties inherent
in estimating reserves; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
we may be unable to obtain
rights-of-way
to construct additional pipelines or the cost to do so may be
uneconomical.
|
A materialization of any of these risks could adversely affect
our ability to achieve growth in the level of our cash flows or
realize benefits from expansion opportunities or construction
projects.
|
|
|
|
We may
not be able to make acquisitions or to make acquisitions on
economically acceptable terms, which may limit our ability to
grow.
|
We will be limited in our ability to make acquisitions by our
business opportunity agreements with Enterprise Products
Partners and Enterprise GP Holdings. These agreements will
entitle them to take business opportunities for the benefit of
themselves before allowing us to take them. In addition, our
ability to grow depends, in part, on our ability to make
acquisitions that result in an increase in the cash generated
from operations per unit. If we are unable to make these
accretive acquisitions either because we are (1) unable to
identify attractive acquisition candidates or negotiate
acceptable purchase
contracts with them, (2) unable to
obtain financing for these acquisitions on economically
acceptable terms, or (3) outbid by competitors, then our
future growth and ability to maintain and increase over time
distributions will be limited.
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
that appear to be accretive may nevertheless reduce our cash
from operations on a per unit basis.
|
Even if we make acquisitions that we believe will be accretive,
these acquisitions may nevertheless reduce our cash from
operations on a per unit basis. Any acquisition involves
potential risks, including, among other things:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
mistaken assumptions about volumes, revenues and costs,
including synergies;
|
| |
| |
•
|
an inability to integrate successfully the businesses we acquire;
|
| |
| |
•
|
a decrease in our liquidity as a result of our using a
significant portion of our available cash or borrowing capacity
to finance the acquisition;
|
| |
| |
•
|
a significant increase in our interest expense or financial
leverage if we incur additional debt to finance the acquisition;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the assumption of unknown liabilities for which we are not
indemnified or for which our indemnity is inadequate;
|
| |
| |
•
|
an inability to hire, train or retain qualified personnel to
manage and operate our growing business and assets;
|
| |
| |
•
|
limitations on rights to indemnity from the seller;
|
| |
| |
•
|
mistaken assumptions about the overall costs of equity or debt;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the diversion of management’s and employees’ attention
from other business concerns;
|
| |
| |
•
|
unforeseen difficulties operating in new product areas or new
geographic areas; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
customer or key employee losses at the acquired businesses.
|
If we consummate any future acquisitions, our capitalization and
results of operations may change significantly, and you will not
have the opportunity to evaluate the economic, financial and
other relevant information that we will consider in determining
the application of these funds and other resources.
29
|
|
|
|
Federal,
state or local regulatory measures could materially affect our
business, results of operations, cash flows and financial
condition.
|
The Surface Transportation Board, or STB, regulates
transportation on interstate propylene pipelines. The current
version of the Interstate Commerce Act, or ICA, and its
implementing regulations give the STB authority to regulate the
rates we charge for service on the propylene pipelines and
generally requires that our rates and practices be just and
reasonable and nondiscriminatory. The rates we charge for
movements on our propylene pipelines may be subject to challenge
and any successful challenge to those rates could adversely
affect our revenues. Our interstate propylene pipelines formerly
were regulated by the FERC, and we cannot guarantee that the
FERC will not reassert jurisdiction over those facilities in the
future.
The intrastate natural gas pipeline transportation services we
provide are subject to various Louisiana state laws and
regulations that apply to the rates we charge and the terms and
conditions of the services we offer. Although state regulation
typically is less onerous than FERC regulation, the rates we
charge and the provision of our services may be subject to
challenge. In addition, the transportation and storage services
furnished by our intrastate natural gas facilities on behalf of
interstate natural gas pipelines or certain local distribution
companies are regulated by the FERC pursuant to Section 311
of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, or NGPA. Pursuant to the
NGPA, we are required to offer those services on an open and
nondiscriminatory basis at a fair and equitable rate. Such
FERC-regulated NGPA Section 311 rates also may be subject
to challenge and successful challenges may adversely affect our
revenues.
Although our natural gas gathering systems are generally exempt
from FERC regulation under the Natural Gas Act of 1938, FERC
regulation still significantly affects our natural gas gathering
business. In recent years, the FERC has pursued pro-competition
policies in its regulation of interstate natural gas pipelines.
If the FERC does not continue this approach, it could have an
adverse effect on the rates we are able to charge in the future.
In addition, the distinction between FERC-regulated transmission
service and federally unregulated gathering services is the
subject of regular litigation, so, in such a circumstance, the
classification and regulation of some of our gathering
facilities may be subject to change based on future
determinations by the FERC and the courts. Additional rules and
legislation pertaining to these matters are considered and
adopted from time to time. We cannot predict what effect, if
any, such regulatory changes and legislation might have on our
operations, but we could be required to incur additional capital
expenditures.
For a general overview of federal, state and local regulation
applicable to our assets, please read “Business —
Regulation of Operations.”
Our
partnership status may be a disadvantage to us in calculating
our cost of service for rate-making purposes.
In May 2005, the FERC issued a policy statement permitting the
inclusion of an income tax allowance in the cost of
service-based rates of a pipeline organized as a tax
pass-through partnership entity to reflect actual or potential
income tax liability on public utility income, if the pipeline
proves that the ultimate owner of its interests has an actual or
potential income tax liability on such income. The policy
statement also provides that whether a pipeline’s owners
have such actual or potential income tax liability will be
reviewed by the FERC on a
case-by-case
basis. In August 2005, the FERC also dismissed requests for
rehearing of its new policy statement. On
December 16,
2005, the FERC issued its first significant case-specific review
of the income tax allowance issue in another company’s rate
case. The FERC reaffirmed its new income tax allowance policy
and directed the subject pipeline to provide certain evidence
necessary for the pipeline to determine its income tax
allowance. The new tax allowance policy and the December 16
order have been appealed to the United States Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia Circuit. As a result, the ultimate
outcome of these proceedings is not certain and could result in
changes to the FERC’s treatment of income tax allowances in
cost of service. Depending upon how the policy statement on
income tax allowances is applied in practice to pipelines
organized as pass-through entities, and whether it is ultimately
upheld or modified on judicial review, these decisions might
adversely affect us.
30
|
|
|
|
Environmental
costs and liabilities and changing environmental regulation
could materially affect our results of operations, cash flows
and financial condition.
|
Our operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local
regulatory requirements relating to environmental affairs,
health and safety, waste management and chemical and petroleum
products. These include, for example, (1) the federal Clean
Air Act and comparable state laws and regulations that impose
obligations related to air emissions, (2) the federal
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA, and comparable
state laws that impose requirements for the discharge of waste
from our facilities and (3) the Comprehensive Environmental
Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, or CERCLA, also
known as “Superfund,” and comparable state laws that
regulate the clean up of hazardous substances that may have been
released at properties currently or previously owned or operated
by us or locations to which we have sent waste for disposal.
Governmental authorities have the power to enforce compliance
with applicable regulations and permits and to subject violators
to administrative, civil and criminal penalties, including
substantial fines, the imposition of remedial requirements, and
the issuance of orders enjoining future operations. Certain
environmental laws, including CERCLA and analogous state laws
and regulations, impose strict, joint and several liability for
costs required to cleanup and restore sites where hazardous
substances or hydrocarbons have been disposed or otherwise
released. Moreover, third parties, including neighboring
landowners, may also have the right to pursue legal actions to
enforce compliance or to recover for personal injury and
property damage allegedly caused by the release of hazardous
substances, hydrocarbons or other waste products into the
environment.
We will make expenditures in connection with environmental
matters as part of normal capital expenditure programs. However,
future environmental law developments, such as stricter laws,
regulations, permits or enforcement policies, could
significantly increase some costs of our operations, including
the handling, manufacture, use, emission or disposal of
substances and wastes.
|
|
|
|
Our
pipeline integrity program may impose significant costs and
liabilities on us.
|
Pursuant to the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002, the
United States Department of Transportation, or DOT, has adopted
regulations requiring pipeline operators to develop integrity
management programs for transportation pipelines located where a
leak or rupture could do the most harm in “high consequence
areas.” The regulations require operators to:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
perform ongoing assessments of pipeline integrity;
|
| |
| |
•
|
identify and characterize applicable threats to pipeline
segments that could impact a high consequence area;
|
| |
| |
•
|
improve data collection, integration and analysis;
|
| |
| |
•
|
repair and remediate the pipeline, as necessary; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
implement preventive and mitigating actions.
|
At this time, we cannot predict the ultimate costs of compliance
with this rule because those costs will depend on the number and
extent of any repairs found to be necessary as a result of the
pipeline integrity testing that is required by the rule. We will
continue our pipeline integrity testing programs to assess and
maintain the integrity of our pipelines. The results of these
tests could cause us to incur significant and unanticipated
capital and operating expenditures for repairs or upgrades
deemed necessary to ensure the continued safe and reliable
operation of our pipelines.
|
|
|
|
We are
subject to strict regulations at many of our facilities
regarding employee safety, and failure to comply with these
regulations could adversely affect our ability to make
distributions to you.
|
The workplaces associated with our pipelines are subject to the
requirements of the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act,
or OSHA, and comparable state statutes that regulate the
protection of the health and safety of workers. In addition, the
OSHA hazard communication standard requires that we maintain
information about hazardous materials used or produced in our
operations and that we provide this information
31
to employees, state and local governmental authorities and local
residents. The failure to comply with OSHA requirements or
general industry standards, keep adequate records or monitor
occupational exposure to regulated substances could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations and ability to make distributions to you.
|
|
|
|
We
depend on Enterprise Products Partners and certain other key
customers for a significant portion of our revenues. The loss of
any of these key customers could result in a decline in our
revenues and cash available to make distributions to
you.
|
We rely on a limited number of customers for a significant
portion of revenues. For the year ended
December 31, 2005
and the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, Enterprise
Products Partners and its affiliates accounted for approximately
9% and 12% of our total combined revenues, respectively. We
expect Enterprise Products Partners and its affiliates will
account for an increased percentage of our total revenues after
this offering. In addition, several of our assets will also rely
on only one or two customers for the asset’s cash flow. For
example, the only shipper on our South Texas NGL pipeline is
Enterprise Products Partners; the only customers on our Lou-Tex
Propylene pipeline are ExxonMobil and Shell; the only customer
on our Sabine Propylene pipeline is Shell; and the only shipper
on the pipeline held by Evangeline is Entergy. In order for new
customers to use these pipelines, we or the new shippers would
be required to construct interim pipeline connections.
Our
contracts with affiliates include storage leases between
Mont Belvieu Caverns and certain
subsidiaries of Enterprise
Products Partners and TEPPCO Partners that will reflect
amendments to prior agreements effective concurrently with the
closing of this offering. The effect of these amendments will be
to decrease the total fees payable to us. Although we believe
the current agreements will generally reflect current market
rates, these agreements will be entered into with affiliates and
not through arms’ length negotiations. Please read
“Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions — Related Party Transactions with
Enterprise Products Partners” for a description of our
affiliate
contracts.
We may be unable to negotiate extensions or replacements of
these
contracts and those with other key customers on favorable
terms. The loss of all or even a portion of the contracted
volumes of these customers, as a result of competition,
creditworthiness or otherwise, could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations and
ability to make distributions to you, unless we are able to
contract for comparable volumes from other customers at
favorable rates.
|
|
|
|
We are
exposed to the credit risks of our key customers, and any
material nonpayment or nonperformance by our key customers could
reduce our ability to make distributions to our
unitholders.
|
We are subject to risks of loss resulting from nonpayment or
nonperformance by our customers. Any material nonpayment or
nonperformance by our key customers could reduce our ability to
make distributions to our unitholders. Furthermore, some of our
customers may be highly leveraged and subject to their own
operating and regulatory risks. We generally do not require
collateral for our accounts receivable. If we fail to adequately
assess the creditworthiness of existing or future customers,
unanticipated deterioration in their creditworthiness and any
resulting increase in nonpayment or nonperformance by them could
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, financial condition and ability to make cash
distributions to you.
|
|
|
|
We
depend on the leadership and involvement of Dan L. Duncan and
other key personnel for the success of our and our
subsidiaries’ businesses.
|
We depend on the leadership, involvement and services of Dan L.
Duncan, the founder of EPCO and the Chairman of our general
partner. Mr. Duncan has been integral to the success of
Enterprise Products Partners and the success of EPCO, and will
be integral to our success, due in part to his ability to
identify and develop business opportunities, make strategic
decisions and attract and retain key personnel. The loss of his
leadership and involvement or the services of any members of our
senior management team could have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial
condition.
32
|
|
|
|
Successful
development of LNG import terminals outside our areas of
operations could reduce the demand for our
services.
|
Development of new, or expansion of existing, LNG facilities
outside our areas of operations could reduce the need for
customers to transport natural gas from supply basins connected
to our pipelines. This could reduce the amount of gas
transported by our pipelines for delivery off-system to other
intrastate or interstate pipelines serving these customers. If
we are not able to replace these volumes with volumes to other
markets or other regions, throughput on our pipelines would
decline which could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition, results of operations and ability to make
distributions to you.
|
|
|
|
We do
not own all of the land on which our pipelines and facilities
are located, which could disrupt our operations.
|
We do not own all of the land on which our pipelines and
facilities are located, and we are therefore subject to the risk
of increased costs to maintain necessary land use. We obtain the
rights to construct and operate certain of our pipelines and
related facilities on land owned by third parties and
governmental agencies for a specific period of time. Our loss of
these rights, through our inability to renew
right-of-way
contracts or otherwise, or increased costs to renew such rights,
could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, financial condition and ability to make
distributions to you.
|
|
|
|
Mergers
among our customers or competitors could result in lower volumes
being shipped on our pipelines, thereby reducing the amount of
cash we generate.
|
Mergers among our existing customers or competitors could
provide strong economic incentives for the combined entities to
utilize systems other than ours and we could experience
difficulty in replacing lost volumes and revenues. Because most
of our operating costs are fixed, a reduction in volumes would
result in not only a reduction of revenues, but also a decline
in net income and cash flow of a similar magnitude, which would
reduce our ability to meet our financial obligations and make
distributions to you.
|
|
|
|
Because
of our lack of asset and geographic diversification, adverse
developments in our pipeline operations would reduce our ability
to make distributions to our unitholders.
|
We rely on the revenues generated from our pipelines and related
assets. Furthermore, our assets are concentrated in Texas and
Louisiana. Due to our lack of diversification in asset type and
location, an adverse development in our business or our
operating areas would have a significantly greater impact on our
financial condition and results of operations than if we
maintained more diverse assets and operating areas.
|
|
|
|
Terrorist
attacks aimed at our facilities or our customers’
facilities could adversely affect our business, results of
operations, cash flows and financial condition.
|
Since the
September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the
United States, the United States government has issued warnings
that energy assets, including our nation’s pipeline
infrastructure, may be the future target of terrorist
organizations. Any terrorist attack on our facilities or
pipelines or those of our customers could have a material
adverse effect on our business.
Risks
Inherent in an Investment in Us
|
|
|
|
Enterprise
Products Partners, EPCO and their affiliates may compete with
us, and business opportunities may be directed by contract to
those affiliates prior to us under the administrative services
agreement.
|
Our partnership agreement will not prohibit Enterprise Products
Partners, EPCO and their affiliates, other than our general
partner, from owning and operating natural gas and NGL pipeline
and storage assets or engaging in businesses that otherwise
compete directly or indirectly with us. In addition, Enterprise
Products Partners and EPCO may acquire, construct or dispose of
additional midstream or other natural gas assets in the future,
without any obligation to offer us the opportunity to purchase
or construct any of these assets.
33
Under the administrative services agreement that we will enter
into at or prior to the closing of this offering, if any
business opportunity, other than a business opportunity to
acquire general partner interests and other related equity
securities in a publicly traded partnership, is presented to
EPCO and its affiliates, us and our general partner, Enterprise
Products Partners and its general partner, or Enterprise GP
Holdings and its general partner, then Enterprise Products
Partners will have the first right to pursue such opportunity
for itself or, in its sole discretion, to affirmatively direct
the opportunity to us. If Enterprise Products Partners abandons
the business opportunity for itself or for us, then Enterprise
GP Holdings will have the second right to pursue such
opportunity. If any business opportunity to acquire general
partner interests and other related equity securities in a
publicly traded partnership is presented, then Enterprise GP
Holdings will have the right to pursue such opportunity before
Enterprise Products Partners is given the opportunity to pursue
it for itself or to direct it to us. Accordingly, we will be
limited by
contract in our ability to take certain business
opportunities for our partnership. Please read
“Conflicts
of Interest, Business Opportunity Agreements and Fiduciary
Duties.”
|
|
|
|
Our
general partner and its affiliates own a controlling interest in
us and have conflicts of interest and limited fiduciary duties,
which may permit them to favor their own interests to your
detriment.
|
Following
the offering, Enterprise Products OLP will own
indirectly a 2% general partner interest and directly
approximately 36.0% of our outstanding common units (or
approximately 26.4% of our outstanding common units if the
underwriters’ option to purchase additional common units is
exercised in full) and will own and control our general partner,
which controls us. Although our general partner has a fiduciary
duty to manage us in a manner beneficial to us and our
unitholders, the directors and officers of our general partner
have a fiduciary duty to manage it and our general partner in a
manner beneficial to Enterprise Products Partners and its
affiliates. Furthermore, certain directors and officers of our
general partner may be directors or officers of affiliates of
our general partner. Conflicts of interest may arise between
Enterprise Products Partners and its affiliates, including our
general partner, on the one hand, and us and our unitholders, on
the other hand. As a result of these conflicts, our general
partner may favor its own interests and the interests of its
affiliates over the interests of our unitholders. Please read
“— Our partnership agreement limits our general
partner’s fiduciary duties to unitholders and restricts the
remedies available to unitholders for actions taken by our
general partner that might otherwise constitute breaches of
fiduciary duty.” These potential conflicts include, among
others, the following situations:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Enterprise Products Partners, EPCO and their affiliates may
engage in substantial competition with us on the terms set forth
in an amended and restated administrative services agreement.
Please read “— Enterprise Products Partners, EPCO
and their affiliates may engage in competition with us, and
business opportunities may be directed by contract to those
affiliates prior to us under an amended and restated
administrative services agreement.”
|
| |
| |
•
|
Neither our partnership agreement nor any other agreement
requires EPCO, Enterprise Products Partners, Enterprise GP
Holdings and TEPPCO Partners or their affiliates (other than our
general partner) to pursue a business strategy that favors us.
Directors and officers of EPCO and the general partners of
Enterprise Products Partners, Enterprise GP Holdings and TEPPCO
Partners and their affiliates have a fiduciary duty to make
decisions in the best interest of their shareholders or
unitholders, which may be contrary to our interests.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Our general partner is allowed to take into account the
interests of parties other than us, such as EPCO, Enterprise
Products Partners, Enterprise GP Holdings and TEPPCO Partners
and their affiliates, in resolving conflicts of interest, which
has the effect of limiting its fiduciary duty to our unitholders.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Some of the officers of EPCO who provide services to us also may
devote significant time to the business of Enterprise Products
Partners, Enterprise GP Holdings and TEPPCO Partners, and will
be compensated by EPCO for such services.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Our partnership agreement limits the liability and reduces the
fiduciary duties of our general partner, while also restricting
the remedies available to our unitholders for actions that,
without these limitations, might constitute breaches of
fiduciary duty. By purchasing common units, unitholders will
|
34
|
|
|
| |
|
be deemed to have consented to some actions and conflicts of
interest that might otherwise constitute a breach of fiduciary
or other duties under applicable law.
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Our general partner determines the amount and timing of asset
purchases and sales, operating expenditures, capital
expenditures, borrowings, repayments of indebtedness, issuances
of additional partnership securities and cash reserves, each of
which can affect the amount of cash that is available for
distribution to our unitholders.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Our general partner determines which costs, including allocated
overhead, incurred by it and its affiliates are reimbursable by
us.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Enterprise Products Partners or TEPPCO Partners may propose to
contribute additional assets to us and, in making such proposal,
the directors of those entities have a fiduciary duty to their
unitholders and not to our unitholders.
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Our partnership agreement does not restrict our general partner
from causing us to pay it or its affiliates for any services
rendered on terms that are fair and reasonable to us or entering
into additional contractual arrangements with any of these
entities on our behalf.
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Our general partner intends to limit its liability regarding our
contractual obligations.
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Our general partner may exercise its rights to call and purchase
all of our common units if at any time it and its affiliates own
80% or more of the outstanding common units.
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Our general partner controls the enforcement of obligations owed
to us by it and its affiliates, including the administrative
services agreement.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Our general partner decides whether to retain separate counsel,
accountants or others to perform services for us.
|
Please read “Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions” and “Conflicts of Interest, Business
Opportunity Agreements and Fiduciary Duties.”
|
|
|
|
We may
be limited in our ability to consummate transactions, including
acquisitions with affiliates of our general
partner.
|
We will have inherent conflicts of interest with affiliates of
our general partner, including Enterprise Products Partners and
TEPPCO Partners. These conflicts may cause the audit and
conflicts committees of these entities not to approve, or
unitholders of these entities to dispute, any transactions that
may be proposed or consummated between or among us and these
affiliates. This may inhibit or prevent us from consummating
transactions, including acquisitions, with them.
|
|
|
|
We do
not have any officers or employees and rely solely on officers
of our general partner and employees of EPCO and its
affiliates.
|
Certain of the executive officers and directors of our general
partner are also officers and/or directors of EPCO, the general
partner of Enterprise GP Holdings, the general partner of
Enterprise Products Partners, the general partner of TEPPCO or
other affiliates of EPCO. These relationships may create
conflicts of interest regarding corporate opportunities and
other matters. The resolution of any such conflicts may not
always be in our or our unitholders’ best interests. In
addition, these overlapping executive officers and directors
allocate their time among EPCO, Enterprise GP Holdings,
Enterprise Products Partners, TEPPCO Partners, us and other
affiliates of EPCO. These officers and directors face potential
conflicts regarding the allocation of their time, which may
adversely affect our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
|
|
|
|
An
affiliate of Enterprise Products Partners will have the power to
appoint and remove our directors and management.
|
Because Enterprise Products OLP owns 100% of DEP Holdings, it
will have the ability to elect all the members of the board of
directors of our general partner. Our general partner will have
control over all
35
decisions related to our operations. Furthermore, the goals and
objectives of Enterprise Products OLP relating to us may not be
consistent with those of a majority of the public unitholders.
|
|
|
|
Our
general partner has a limited call right that may require you to
sell your common units at an undesirable time or
price.
|
If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own 80% or
more of the outstanding common units, our general partner will
have the right, which it may assign to any of its affiliates or
to us, but not the obligation, to acquire all, but not less than
all, of the common units held by unaffiliated persons at a price
equal to the greater of:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the average of the daily closing prices of the common units over
the 20 trading days preceding the date three days before notice
of exercise of the call right is first mailed and
|
| |
| |
•
|
the highest price paid by our general partner or any of its
affiliates for common units during the
90-day
period preceding the date such notice is first mailed.
|
As a result, you may be required to sell your common units at a
price that is less than the initial offering price in this
offering or, because of the manner in which the purchase price
is determined, at a price less than the then current market
price of the common units. In addition, this call right may be
exercised at an otherwise undesirable time or price and you may
not receive any return on your investment. You may also incur a
tax liability upon a sale of your common units. Our general
partner is not obligated to obtain a fairness opinion regarding
the value of the common units to be repurchased by it upon
exercise of the call right. There is no restriction in our
partnership agreement that prevents our general partner from
issuing additional common units or other equity securities and
exercising its call right. If our general partner exercised its
call right, the effect would be to take us private and, if the
common units were subsequently deregistered, we might no longer
be subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Following
this offering, affiliates of our general partner will own
approximately 36.0% of the outstanding common units
(approximately 26.4% of the outstanding common units if the
underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional common
units in full).
For additional information about the call right, please read
“Description of Material Provisions of Our Partnership
Agreement — Limited Call Right.”
|
|
|
|
Our
partnership agreement limits our general partner’s
fiduciary duties to unitholders and restricts the remedies
available to unitholders for actions taken by our general
partner that might otherwise constitute breaches of fiduciary
duty.
|
Our partnership agreement contains provisions that reduce the
standards to which our general partner would otherwise be held
by state fiduciary duty law. For example, our partnership
agreement:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
permits our general partner to make a number of decisions in its
individual capacity, as opposed to in its capacity as our
general partner. This entitles our general partner to consider
only the interests and factors that it desires, and it has no
duty or obligation to give any consideration to any interest of,
or factors affecting, us, our affiliates or any limited partner.
Examples include the exercise of its limited call right, its
rights to vote or transfer the common units it owns, its
registration rights and the determination of whether to consent
to any merger or consolidation of the partnership or amendment
to the partnership agreement;
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
provides in the absence of bad faith by the audit and conflicts
committee or our general partner, the resolution, action or
terms made, taken or provided in connection with a potential
conflict of interest transaction will be conclusive and binding
on all persons (including all partners) and will not constitute
a breach of the partnership agreement or any standard of care or
duty imposed by law;
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
provides the general partner shall not be liable to the
partnership or any partner for its good faith reliance on the
provisions of the partnership agreement to the extent it has
duties, including fiduciary duties, and liabilities at law or in
equity;
|
36
|
|
|
| |
•
|
generally provides that affiliate transactions and resolutions
of conflicts of interest not approved by the audit and conflicts
committee of the board of directors of our general partner must
be on terms no less favorable to us than those generally
provided to or available from unrelated third parties or be
“fair and reasonable” to us;
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
provides that it shall be presumed that the resolution of any
conflicts of interest by our general partner or the audit and
conflicts committee was not made in bad faith, and in any
proceeding brought by or on behalf of any limited partner or us,
the person bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the
burden of overcoming such presumption; and
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
provides that our general partner and its officers and directors
will not be liable for monetary damages to us or our limited
partners for any acts or omissions unless there has been a final
and non-appealable judgment entered by a court of competent
jurisdiction determining that the general partner or those other
persons acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud or willful
misconduct or, in the case of a criminal matter, acted with
knowledge that the conduct was criminal.
|
By purchasing a common unit, a unitholder will become bound by
the provisions of our partnership agreement, including the
provisions described above. Please read “Description of Our
Common Units — Transfer of Units.”
|
|
|
|
Unitholders
have limited voting rights and are not entitled to elect our
general partner or its directors, which could lower the trading
price of our common units.
|
Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, unitholders
have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our
business and, therefore, limited ability to influence
management’s decisions regarding our business. Unitholders
will have no right to elect our general partner or its board of
directors on an annual or other continuing basis. The board of
directors of our general partner, including the independent
directors, is chosen entirely by its owners and not by the
unitholders. Furthermore, even if our unitholders were
dissatisfied with the performance of our general partner, they
will, practically speaking, have no ability to remove our
general partner. As a result of these limitations, the price at
which the common units will trade could be diminished because of
the absence or reduction of a control premium in the trading
price.
The vote of the holders of at least
662/3%
of all outstanding common units is required to remove our
general partner. Following the closing of this offering,
Enterprise Products Partners and its affiliates will own
approximately 36.0% of our outstanding common units (or
approximately 26.4% of our outstanding common units if the
underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional common
units in full).
|
|
|
|
You
will experience immediate and substantial dilution of
$5.64 per unit.
|
The assumed initial public offering price of $20.00 per
unit exceeds the pro forma net tangible book value of
$14.36 per common unit. Based on this assumed initial
public offering price, you will incur immediate and substantial
dilution of $5.64 per unit. This dilution results primarily
because the assets sold and contributed by our general partner
and its affiliates are recorded at their historical cost, and
not their fair value, in accordance with GAAP. Please read
“Dilution.”
|
|
|
|
We may
issue additional units without your approval, which would dilute
your ownership interests.
|
At any time, we may issue an unlimited number of limited partner
interests of any type without the approval of our unitholders.
Our partnership agreement does not give our unitholders the
right to approve our issuance of equity securities ranking
junior to the common units at any time. In addition, our
partnership agreement does not prohibit the issuance by our
subsidiaries of equity securities, which may effectively rank
senior to the common units.
The issuance by us of additional common units or other equity
securities will have the following effects:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the ownership interest of unitholders immediately prior to the
issuance will decrease;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the amount of cash distributions on each common unit may
decrease;
|
37
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding
common unit may be diminished;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the ratio of taxable income to distributions may
increase; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
the market price of the common units may decline.
|
|
|
|
|
Our
partnership agreement restricts the voting rights of unitholders
owning 20% or more of our common units.
|
Our partnership agreement restricts unitholders’ voting
rights by providing that any common units held by a person that
owns 20% or more of any class of units then outstanding, other
than our general partner, its affiliates, their transferees and
persons who acquired such units with the prior approval of the
board of directors of our general partner, cannot vote on any
matter. Our partnership agreement also contains provisions
limiting the ability of common unitholders to call meetings or
to acquire information about our operations, as well as other
provisions limiting common unitholders’ ability to
influence the manner or direction of management.
|
|
|
|
We
have a holding company structure in which our subsidiaries
conduct our operations and own our operating assets, which may
affect our ability to make distributions to you.
|
We are a partnership holding company and our operating
subsidiaries conduct all of our operations and own all of our
operating assets. We have no significant assets other than the
ownership interests in our
subsidiaries and joint ventures. As a
result, our ability to make distributions to our unitholders
depends on the performance of our
subsidiaries and joint
ventures and their ability to distribute funds to us. The
ability of our
subsidiaries and joint ventures to make
distributions to us may be restricted by, among other things,
the provisions of existing and future indebtedness, applicable
state partnership and limited liability company laws and other
laws and regulations, including FERC policies. For example, all
cash flows from Evangeline are currently used to service its
debt.
Affiliates of Enterprise Products Partners currently own a
minority equity interest in all of our
subsidiaries and will
have a right of first refusal to acquire these
subsidiaries or
their material assets if we desire to sell them, other than
inventory and other assets sold in the ordinary course of
business. These rights may adversely affect our ability to
dispose of these assets. In addition, our ownership interest in
Mont Belvieu Caverns may be diluted, and the cash flow from
our NGL & Petrochemical Storage Services segment may be
reduced, if we do not contribute our proportionate share of any
future costs to fund expansion projects at Mont Belvieu Caverns.
|
|
|
|
We do
not have the same flexibility as other types of organizations to
accumulate cash and equity to protect against illiquidity in the
future.
|
Unlike a corporation, our partnership agreement requires us to
make quarterly distributions to our unitholders of all available
cash reduced by any amounts of reserves for commitments and
contingencies, including capital and operating costs and debt
service requirements. The value of our common units and other
limited partner interests may decrease in direct correlation
with decreases in the amount we distribute per common unit.
Accordingly, if we experience a liquidity problem in the future,
we may not be able to issue more equity to recapitalize.
|
|
|
|
Cost
reimbursements to EPCO and its affiliates will reduce cash
available for distribution to you.
|
Prior to making any distribution on the common units, we will
reimburse EPCO and its affiliates for all expenses they incur on
our behalf, including allocated overhead. These amounts will
include all costs incurred in managing and operating us,
including costs for rendering administrative staff and support
services to us, and overhead allocated to us by EPCO. Please
read “Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on
Distributions,” “Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions” and “Conflicts of Interest,
Business Opportunity Agreements and Fiduciary Duties —
Conflicts of Interest and Business Opportunity Agreements.”
The
38
payment of these amounts, including allocated overhead, to EPCO
and its affiliates could adversely affect our ability to make
distributions to you.
|
|
|
|
Unitholders
may not have limited liability if a court finds that unitholder
action constitutes control of our business.
|
The limitations on the liability of holders of limited partner
interests for the obligations of a limited partnership have not
been clearly established in some of the states in which we do
business. You could have unlimited liability for our obligations
if a court or government agency determined that:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
we were conducting business in a state, but had not complied
with that particular state’s partnership statute; or
|
| |
| |
•
|
your right to act with other unitholders to remove or replace
our general partner, to approve some amendments to our
partnership agreement or to take other actions under our
partnership agreement constituted “control” of our
business.
|
Please read “Description of Material Provisions of Our
Partnership Agreement — Limited Liability” for a
discussion of the implications of the limitations of liability
on a unitholder.
|
|
|
|
Unitholders
may have liability to repay distributions.
|
Under certain circumstances, unitholders may have to repay
amounts wrongfully returned or distributed to them. Under
Section 17-607
of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (the
“Delaware Act”), we may not make a distribution to you
if the distribution would cause our liabilities to exceed the
fair value of our assets. Liabilities to partners on account of
their partnership interests and liabilities that are
non-recourse to the partnership are not counted for purposes of
determining whether a distribution is permitted. Delaware law
provides that for a period of three years from the date of an
impermissible distribution, limited partners who received the
distribution and who knew at the time of the distribution that
it violated Delaware law will be liable to the limited
partnership for the distribution amount. A purchaser of common
units who becomes a limited partner is liable for the
obligations of the transferring limited partner to make
contributions to the partnership that are known to such
purchaser of common units at the time it became a limited
partner and for unknown obligations if the liabilities could be
determined from our partnership agreement.
|
|
|
|
Our
general partner’s interest in us and the control of our
general partner may be transferred to a third party without
unitholder consent.
|
Our general partner may transfer its general partner interest to
a third party in a merger or in a sale of all or substantially
all of its assets without the consent of the unitholders.
Furthermore, there is no restriction in our partnership
agreement on the ability of DEP Holdings or Enterprise Products
OLP to transfer their equity interests in our general partner or
our general partner to a third party. The new equity owner of
our general partner would then be in a position to replace the
board of directors and officers of our general partner with
their own choices and to influence the decisions taken by the
board of directors and officers of our general partner.
|
|
|
|
There
is no existing market for our common units, and a trading market
that will provide you with adequate liquidity may not
develop.
|
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for the
common units. After this offering, there will be 13,000,000
publicly traded common units, assuming no exercise of the
underwriters’ option to purchase additional common units.
We do not know the extent to which investor interest will lead
to the development of a trading market or how liquid that market
might be. You may not be able to resell your common units at or
above the initial public offering price. Additionally, the lack
of liquidity may result in wide bid-ask spreads, contribute to
significant fluctuations in the market price of the common units
and limit the number of investors who are able to buy the common
units.
39
The initial public offering price for the common units will be
determined by negotiations between us and the representatives of
the underwriters and may not be indicative of the market price
of the common units that will prevail in the trading market. The
market price of our common units may decline below the initial
public offering price.
Tax
Risks
You should read “Material Tax Consequences” for a more
complete discussion of the expected material federal income tax
consequences of owning and disposing of common units.
|
|
|
|
Our
tax treatment depends on our status as a partnership for federal
income tax purposes, as well as our not being subject to a
material amount of entity-level taxation by individual states.
If the IRS were to treat us as a corporation or if we were to
become subject to a material amount of entity-level taxation for
state tax purposes, then our cash distributions to you would be
substantially reduced.
|
The anticipated after-tax benefit of an investment in the common
units depends largely on our being treated as a partnership for
federal income tax purposes. We have not requested, and do not
plan to request, a ruling from the IRS on this or any other
matter affecting us.
If we were treated as a corporation for federal income tax
purposes, we would pay federal income tax on our income at the
corporate tax rate, which is currently a maximum of 35%.
Distributions to you would generally be taxed again as corporate
distributions, and no income, gains, losses, deductions or
credits would flow through to you. Because a tax would be
imposed upon us as a corporation, our cash available for
distribution to you would be substantially reduced. Thus,
treatment of us as a corporation would result in a material
reduction in the anticipated cash flow and after-tax return to
you, likely causing a substantial reduction in the value of the
common units.
Current law may change, causing us to be treated as a
corporation for federal income tax purposes or otherwise
subjecting us to a material amount of entity-level taxation. In
addition, because of widespread state budget deficits and other
reasons, several states, including Texas, are evaluating ways to
enhance state-tax collections. For example, our operating
subsidiaries will be subject to a newly revised Texas franchise
tax (the
“Texas Margin Tax”) on the portion of their
revenue that is generated in Texas beginning for tax reports due
on or after
January 1, 2008. Specifically, the Texas Margin
Tax will be imposed at a maximum effective rate of 0.7% of the
operating
subsidiaries’ gross revenue that is apportioned
to Texas. If any additional state were to impose a tax upon us
or the operating
subsidiaries as an entity, the cash available
for distribution to you would be reduced.
|
|
|
|
If the
IRS contests the federal income tax positions we take, the
market for our common units may be adversely impacted, and the
costs of any contest will reduce our cash distributions to
you.
|
We have not requested any ruling from the IRS with respect to
our treatment as a partnership for federal income tax purposes
or any other matter affecting us. The IRS may adopt positions
that differ from our counsel’s conclusions expressed in
this prospectus. It may be necessary to resort to administrative
or court proceedings to sustain some or all of our
counsel’s conclusions or the positions we take. A court may
not agree with some or all of our counsel’s conclusions or
the positions we take. Any contest with the IRS may materially
and adversely impact the market for our common units and the
price at which they trade. In addition, because the costs of any
contest with the IRS will be borne indirectly by our unitholders
and our general partner, any such contest will result in a
reduction in cash available for distribution.
|
|
|
|
You
may be required to pay taxes on your share of our income even if
you do not receive any cash distributions from us.
|
You will be required to pay federal income taxes and, in some
cases, state and local income taxes on your share of our taxable
income, whether or not you receive cash distributions from us.
You may not receive cash distributions from us equal to your
share of our taxable income or even equal to the actual tax
liability that results from your share of our taxable income.
40
|
|
|
|
Tax
gain or loss on the disposition of our common units could be
different than expected.
|
If you sell your common units, you will recognize gain or loss
equal to the difference between the amount realized and your tax
basis in those common units. Prior distributions to you in
excess of the total net taxable income you were allocated for a
common unit, which decreased your tax basis in that common unit,
will, in effect, become taxable income to you if the common unit
is sold at a price greater than your tax basis in that common
unit, even if the price you receive is less than your original
cost. A substantial portion of the amount realized, whether or
not representing gain, may be ordinary income to you.
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt
entities and foreign persons face unique tax issues from owning
common units that may result in adverse tax consequences to
them.
|
Investment in common units by tax-exempt entities, such as
individual retirement accounts (“IRAs”), other
retirement plans, and
non-U.S. persons
raises issues unique to them. For example, virtually all of our
income allocated to organizations that are exempt from federal
income tax, including IRAs and other retirement plans, will be
unrelated business taxable income and will be taxable to them.
Distributions to
non-U.S. persons
will be reduced by withholding taxes at the highest applicable
effective tax rate, and
non-U.S. persons
will be required to file United States federal tax returns and
pay tax on their share of our taxable income. If you are a
tax-exempt entity or a
non-U.S. person
you should consult your tax advisor before investing in our
common units.
|
|
|
|
We
will treat each purchaser of common units as having the same tax
benefits without regard to the common units purchased. The IRS
may challenge this treatment, which could result in a decrease
in the value of the common units.
|
Because we cannot match transferors and transferees of common
units, we will adopt depreciation and amortization positions
that may not conform with all aspects of existing Treasury
regulations. A successful IRS challenge to those positions could
decrease the amount of tax benefits available to you. It also
could affect the timing of these tax benefits or the amount of
gain from your sale of common units and could have a negative
impact on the value of our common units or result in audit
adjustments to your tax returns. Please read “Material Tax
Consequences — Uniformity of Units” for a further
discussion of the effect of the depreciation and amortization
positions we will adopt.
|
|
|
|
The
sale or exchange of 50% or more of our capital and profits
interests will result in the termination of our partnership for
federal income tax purposes.
|
We will be considered to have terminated for federal income tax
purposes if there is a sale or exchange of 50% or more of the
total interests in our capital and profits within a twelve month
period. Our termination would, among other things, result in the
closing of our taxable year for all unitholders and could result
in a deferral of depreciation deductions allowable in computing
our taxable income. Please read “Material Tax
Consequences — Disposition of Common Units —
Constructive Termination” for a discussion of the
consequences of our termination for federal income tax purposes.
|
|
|
|
You
may be subject to state and local taxes and return filing
requirements as a result of investing in our common
units.
|
In addition to federal income taxes, you will likely be subject
to other taxes, such as state and local income taxes,
unincorporated business taxes and estate, inheritance or
intangible taxes that are imposed by the various jurisdictions
in which we do business or own property. You may be required to
file state and local income tax returns and pay state and local
income taxes in some or all of these various jurisdictions.
Further, you may be subject to penalties for failure to comply
with those requirements. We will initially own property or
conduct business in Louisiana and Texas. We may own property or
conduct business in other states or foreign countries in the
future. It is your responsibility to file all federal, state and
local tax returns. Our counsel has not rendered an opinion on
the state and local tax consequences of an investment in our
common units.
41
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We expect to receive net proceeds from this offering of
approximately $243.4 million (based on an assumed offering
price of $20.00 per unit), after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and a $1.0 million structuring
fee, but before estimated net expenses associated with the
offering and related formation transactions.
We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering to:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
distribute approximately $212.3 million to Enterprise
Products OLP as a portion of the cash consideration and
reimbursement for capital expenditures relating to the assets
contributed to us;
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
provide approximately $28.2 million to fund our
66% share of estimated capital expenditures to complete
planned expansions to the South Texas NGL pipeline system and
brine production and above-ground storage projects at Mont
Belvieu subsequent to the closing of this offering; and
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
pay approximately $2.9 million of other estimated net
expenses associated with this offering and related formation
transactions described on page 2.
|
The portion of net proceeds that we retain to fund planned
expansions (and the amount that we plan to distribute to
Enterprise Products OLP) assumes that, prior to the closing date
of this offering, South Texas NGL and Mont Belvieu Caverns will
have recorded $59 million of a total estimated additional
cost of $101.7 million to complete our acquisition and
construction of the South Texas NGL pipeline system and our
completion of brine production and above-ground storage projects
at Mont Belvieu. The amounts actually distributed or retained at
the closing of this offering will be increased or decreased by
an amount equal to 66% of the difference between:
(1) $101.7 million (the estimated total additional
costs); and
|
|
|
| |
(2)
|
the actual construction and acquisition costs paid with respect
to (i) the South Texas NGL pipeline (excluding the original
pipeline purchase costs of approximately $97.7 million) and
(ii) the Mont Belvieu brine production and above-ground
storage projects, prior to the contribution of interests in
South Texas NGL and Mont Belvieu Caverns to us at the closing of
this offering.
|
Of the $59 million in total estimated costs noted above, as
of
December 31, 2006, we had recorded $19.6 million of
the estimated additional costs for construction and acquisition
of the South Texas NGL pipeline system and $21.3 million of
the estimated additional costs related to the Mont Belvieu brine
production and above-ground storage projects.
If
the offering price is more or less than the assumed
$20.00 per unit price, the amount that we will actually
distribute to Enterprise Products OLP will also be increased or
decreased by all of the difference in such net proceeds from
this offering.
Concurrently with the closing of this offering, we will also
borrow approximately $200 million under our new
$300 million credit agreement. We will distribute
$198.9 million of these borrowings to Enterprise Products
OLP in partial consideration for the assets contributed to us
upon the closing of this offering. For a description of our
credit agreement, please read “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations — Liquidity and Capital
Resources — New Revolving Credit Facility.”
If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional
common units, we will use all of the net proceeds from the sale
of those common units to redeem an equal number of common units
from Enterprise Products OLP, which may be deemed a selling
unitholder in this offering. Please read “Selling
Unitholder” and “Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management.”
42
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the cash and capitalization of our predecessor, Duncan Energy
Partners Predecessor, as of September 30, 2006 on a
combined historical basis;
|
| |
| |
•
|
our pro forma cash and capitalization as of September 30,
2006, after, giving effect to:
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the August 2006 purchase of a pipeline by Enterprise Products
Partners for approximately $97.7 million in cash, the
subsequent contribution of this pipeline to South Texas NGL and
the payment of estimated additional costs of $37.7 million
required to modify this pipeline and to acquire and construct
additional pipelines in order to place this pipeline system into
operation in January 2007;
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the payment of estimated additional costs of $21.3 million
required to expand our Mont Belvieu brine production capacity
and above-ground storage reservoirs;
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the contribution of a 66% interest in certain entities which are
wholly-owned subsidiaries of Enterprise Products Partners, and
the retention by Enterprise Products Partners of a 34% interest
in these entities;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the revision of related party storage contracts between us and
Enterprise Products Partners to (1) increase certain
storage fees paid by Enterprise Products Partners and
(2) reflect the allocation to Enterprise Products Partners
of all storage measurement gains and losses relating to products
under these agreements, and the execution of a limited liability
company agreement for Mont Belvieu Caverns providing for the
special allocation and other agreements relating to other
measurement gains and losses to Enterprise Products
Partners; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
the assignment to us of certain third-party agreements that
effectively reduce tariff rates received by us for the transport
of propylene volumes; and
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
our unaudited pro forma, as adjusted cash and capitalization as
of September 30, 2006, after giving effect to the
transactions described above, this offering, the borrowing of
approximately $200 million under a new $300 million
credit agreement by us in connection with our acquisition of
ownership interests in our subsidiaries from Enterprise Products
Partners, and the application of the net proceeds from this
offering and the borrowings as described under “Use of
Proceeds.”
|
This table is derived from, and should be read together with,
the historical combined financial statements of Duncan Energy
Partners Predecessor and our unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial information included elsewhere in this
prospectus. You should also read this table in conjunction with
“Summary — Duncan Energy Partners
L.P. — Formation Transactions,” “Use of
Proceeds,” and “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma,
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
28,188
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
Owner’s net
investment — predecessor
|
|
|
662,131
|
|
|
|
716,465
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Parent’s interest in
Partnership
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
305,233
|
|
|
Partnership equity —
common units — public
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
240,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
662,131
|
|
|
$
|
716,465
|
|
|
$
|
745,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(a)
|
Represents cash retained for our 66% share of estimated 2007
capital expenditures to complete planned expansions of our South
Texas NGL pipeline and Mont Belvieu brine-related facilities.
|
43
DILUTION
Dilution is the amount by which
the offering price paid by
purchasers of our common units sold in this offering will exceed
the pro forma net tangible book value per common unit after the
offering. Assuming an initial public offering price of
$20.00 per common unit, on a pro forma basis as of
September 30, 2006, after giving effect to
the offering of
13,000,000 common units, our net tangible book value was
$297.5 million, or $14.36 per common unit. This amount
includes equity from new investors of $240.5 million and
the parent’s interest in common units and the general
partner interest of $61.6 million less the
Partnership’s 66% share of intangible assets. Purchasers of
our common units in this offering will experience substantial
and immediate dilution in net tangible book value per common
unit for financial accounting purposes, as illustrated in the
following table.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed initial public offering
price per common unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value
per common unit before the offering(1)
|
|
$
|
60.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in net tangible book
value per common unit attributable to purchasers in the offering
|
|
|
46.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Pro forma net tangible book
value per common unit after the offering(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immediate dilution in net tangible
book value per common unit to purchasers in the offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Determined by dividing the net tangible book value of the
contributed net assets of $468.2 million, net of subsidiary
ownership interests retained by parent of $243.6 million,
by the number of common units (7,301,571 common units and the 2%
general partner interest, which has a dilutive effect equivalent
to 414,318 common units) to be issued to our general partner and
its affiliates for their contribution of assets and liabilities
to us. Our general partner’s dilutive effect equivalent was
determined by multiplying the total number of common units
deemed to be outstanding (i.e., the total number of common units
outstanding of 20,301,571 divided by 98%) by our general
partner’s 2% general partner interest. |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Determined by dividing our pro forma net tangible book value of
$297.5 million, which reflects the application of the
assumed net proceeds of this offering, by the total number of
common units (20,301,571 common units and the 2% general partner
interest, which has a dilutive effect equivalent to 414,318
common units) to be outstanding after the offering. The
following table shows our calculation of pro forma net
tangible book value (dollars in thousands): |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net book value,
including Parent interest
|
|
$
|
302,155
|
|
|
Less: 66% share of intangible
assets attributable to parent’s interest in common units
and the general partner interest and new investors
|
|
|
(4,636
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value,
including Parent interest
|
|
$
|
297,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the number of common units that
we will issue and the total consideration contributed to us by
our general partner and its affiliates and by the purchasers of
common units in this offering (dollars in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Units
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Consideration
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
Parent’s interest in common
units and general partner interest (1)(2)
|
|
|
7,715,889
|
|
|
|
37.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
61,635
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
%
|
|
New investors
|
|
|
13,000,000
|
|
|
|
62.8
|
%
|
|
|
240,520
|
|
|
|
79.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
20,715,889
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
302,155
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Upon the consummation of this offering, Enterprise Products OLP
and our general partner will own an aggregate of 7,301,571
common units and a 2% general partner interest having a dilutive
effect equivalent to 414,318 common units. |
44
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The assets contributed by Enterprise Products OLP were recorded
at historical cost in accordance with GAAP. Book value of the
consideration provided by our general partner and Enterprise
Products OLP, as of September 30, 2006, after giving effect
to the application of the net proceeds of the offering and the
retention of a 34% equity interest in the contributed
subsidiaries is as follows (dollars in thousands): |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma owners’ net
investment
|
|
$
|
716,465
|
|
Less: Payment to Parent from the
net proceeds of the offering and borrowings under the credit
agreement
|
|
|
(411,232
|
)
|
Less: Parent retention of 34% of
the equity interests in contributed subsidiaries of the
Partnership
|
|
|
(243,598
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration for
Parent’s interest in common units and general partner
interest
|
|
$
|
61,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For financial reporting purposes, the parent’s retained
interest in the
subsidiaries of $243.6 million and the
carryover basis in the common units and the general partner
interest as part of this offering is presented outside the
Partnership equity from the new public investors.
45
CASH
DISTRIBUTION POLICY
AND RESTRICTIONS ON DISTRIBUTIONS
You should read the following discussion of our cash
distribution policy in conjunction with the specific assumptions
included in this section. For detailed information regarding the
factors and assumptions upon which our cash distribution policy
is based, please read “— Assumptions and
Considerations” below. In addition, you should read
“Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk
Factors” for information regarding statements that do not
relate strictly to historical or current facts and certain risks
inherent in our business.
For additional information regarding our historical and pro
forma financial information, you should refer to the audited
historical combined financial statements of Duncan Energy
Partners Predecessor for the years ended December 31, 2003,
2004 and 2005 and the nine months ended September 30, 2006,
our unaudited historical financial statements for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005, and our unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial information at
September 30, 2006 and for the year ended December 31,
2005 and nine months ended September 30, 2006 included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
General
Rationale
for Our Cash Distribution Policy
Our partnership agreement requires us to distribute all of our
available cash on a quarterly basis. Available cash is defined
to mean generally, for each fiscal quarter, all cash and cash
equivalents on the date of determination of available cash for
such quarter, less the reserves that our general partner
determines are necessary or appropriate to provide for the
conduct of our business, to comply with applicable law, any of
our debt instruments or other agreements or to provide for
future distributions to our unitholders for any one or more of
the upcoming four quarters. We intend to fund a portion of our
capital expenditures with additional borrowings under our new
revolving credit facility or the issuance of additional units.
We may also borrow to make distributions to unitholders, for
example, in circumstances where we believe that the distribution
level is sustainable over the long term, but short-term factors
have caused available cash from operations to be insufficient to
pay the distribution at the current level. Our partnership
agreement will not restrict our ability to borrow to pay
distributions. It is the current policy of the board of
directors of our general partner, however, that we should
maintain or increase our level of quarterly cash distributions
only when, in its judgment, we can sustain such distribution
levels over a long-term period. Our cash distribution policy
reflects a basic judgment that our unitholders will be better
served by us distributing our available cash, after expenses and
reserves, rather than retaining it. Also, because we are not
subject to an entity-level federal income tax, we have more cash
to distribute to you than would be the case if we were subject
to federal income tax.
Restrictions
and Limitations on Cash Distributions and Our Ability to Change
Our Cash Distribution Policy
There is no guarantee that unitholders will receive quarterly
distributions from us. Our distribution policy is subject to
certain restrictions and may be changed at any time, including:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Our cash distribution policy will be subject to restrictions on
distributions under our new credit facility. Specifically, our
revolving credit facility contains certain material financial
tests, such as a Consolidated Debt to Consolidated EBITDA ratio,
or leverage ratio, not to exceed 4.75 to 1.00 and a Consolidated
EBITDA to Consolidated Interest Expense ratio, or interest
coverage ratio, of not less than 2.75 to 1.00, and other
covenants that we must satisfy. Should we be unable to satisfy
these restrictions under our revolving credit facility, or if we
otherwise default under our revolving credit facility, we would
be prohibited from making a distribution to you notwithstanding
our stated cash distribution policy. These financial tests and
covenants are described in the prospectus under the caption
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and
Capital Resources — New Revolving Credit
Facility.”
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Our general partner will have the authority to establish cash
reserves for the prudent conduct of our business and for future
cash distributions to our unitholders, and the establishment of
those reserves
|
46
|
|
|
| |
|
could result in a reduction in cash distributions to you from
levels we currently anticipate pursuant to our stated cash
distribution policy. Any determination to establish reserves
made by our general partner in the absence of bad faith will be
binding on the unitholders. Over a period of time, if we do not
set aside sufficient cash reserves or make sufficient cash
expenditures to maintain our asset base, we will be unable to
pay distributions at the current level from cash generated from
operations and would therefore expect to reduce our
distributions. We will not be able to increase our current level
of distributions without making accretive acquisitions or
capital expenditures that grow our asset base. A significant
decrease in throughput volumes or in the demand for or
production of hydrocarbon products from current levels would
adversely affect our ability to pay distributions. If our asset
base decreases and we do not reduce our distributions, a portion
of the distributions you receive may be considered a return of
part of your investment in us as opposed to a return on your
investment.
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
While our partnership agreement requires us to distribute all of
our available cash, our partnership agreement, including our
cash distribution policy contained therein, may be amended with
the consent of the general partner and a vote of the holders of
a majority of our common units. Following completion of this
offering, our public unitholders will own 64.0% of our common
units and Enterprise Products Partners (our parent and sponsor)
will own the remainder.
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Even if our cash distribution policy is not amended, modified or
revoked, the amount of distributions we pay under our cash
distribution policy and the decision to make any distribution is
determined by our general partner, taking into consideration the
terms of our partnership agreement. Enterprise Products OLP owns
our general partner.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Under
Section 17-607
of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, we may
not make a distribution to our partners if the distribution
would cause our liabilities to exceed the fair value of our
assets.
|
We may lack sufficient cash to pay distributions to our
unitholders due to a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
A reduction in throughput volumes on our pipelines would
decrease our cash receipts from pipeline transportation
revenues, which would reduce cash available to pay distributions.
|
| |
| |
•
|
An increase in operating expenses, general and administrative
costs and state and federal income taxes would increase our cash
outlays for such items, which would reduce cash available to pay
distributions.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Principal repayments (to the extent not refinanced) and interest
payments on any current or future debt would generally be made
from cash generated by operating activities, which would reduce
cash available to pay distributions.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Capital expenditures reduce cash available to pay distributions
to the extent such amounts are funded from cash generated by
operating activities.
|
| |
| |
•
|
To the extent not funded by borrowings under our revolving
credit facility, working capital needs for such items as
inventory or prepaid items reduce cash available to pay
distributions.
|
Please read “Risk Factors” for additional discussion
of these factors.
Our
Ability to Grow Depends on Our Ability to Access External Growth
Capital
Our partnership agreement requires us to distribute all of our
available cash to our unitholders. As a result, we expect to
rely primarily upon external financing sources, including
commercial bank borrowings and the issuance of debt and equity
securities, to fund acquisition capital expenditures. To the
extent we are unable to finance growth externally, our cash
distribution policy will significantly impair our ability to
grow. To the extent we issue additional units in connection with
any acquisitions or other capital expenditures, the payment of
distributions on those additional units may increase the risk
that we will be unable to maintain or increase our per unit
distribution level, which in turn may impact the available cash
that we have to distribute on each unit. There are no
limitations in our partnership agreement or our revolving credit
facility on our ability to issue additional units, including
units ranking senior to the common units. The incurrence of
additional
47
commercial borrowings or other debt to finance any future growth
would result in increased interest expense, which in turn may
impact the amount of available cash that we have to distribute
to our unitholders.
Our
Initial Distribution Rate
Upon completion of this offering, the board of directors of our
general partner will adopt a cash distribution policy pursuant
to which we will declare an initial distribution of
$0.40 per unit per quarter (pro rated for the first quarter
during which we are a publicly traded partnership), or
$1.60 per unit per year, to be paid no later than
45 days after the end of each fiscal quarter. This equates
to an aggregate cash distribution of approximately
$8.3 million per quarter, or $33.1 million per year,
based on the units outstanding immediately after completion of
this offering. If the underwriters’ option to purchase
additional units is exercised, an equivalent number of common
units will be redeemed from Enterprise Products OLP.
Accordingly, the exercise of the underwriters’ option to
purchase additional units will not affect the total amount of
units outstanding or the amount of cash needed to pay the
initial distribution rate on all units. Our ability to make cash
distributions at the initial distribution rate pursuant to this
policy will be subject to the factors described above under the
caption “— General — Restrictions
and Limitations on Cash Distributions and Our Ability to Change
Our Cash Distribution Policy.”
As of the date of this offering, our general partner will be
entitled to 2% of all distributions that we make prior to our
liquidation. The general partner’s initial 2% interest in
these distributions may be reduced if we issue additional units
in the future and our general partner does not contribute a
proportionate amount of capital to us to maintain its initial 2%
general partner interest. Our general partner is not obligated
to contribute a proportionate amount of capital to us to
maintain its current general partner interest.
The following table sets forth the estimated aggregate
distribution amounts payable on our common units and general
partner interest during the year following the closing of this
proposed offering at our initial distribution rate of
$0.40 per common unit per quarter (or $1.60 per common
unit on an annualized basis).
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Quarterly Distribution
|
|
|
Units
|
|
One Quarter
|
|
|
Four Quarters
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Common units held by parent
(Enterprise Products OLP)
|
|
$
|
2,141
|
|
|
$
|
8,562
|
|
|
Common units held by public
unitholders (non-parent)
|
|
|
5,980
|
|
|
|
23,920
|
|
|
General partner interest
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,287
|
|
|
$
|
33,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These distributions will not be cumulative. Consequently, if
distributions on our common units are not paid with respect to
any fiscal quarter at the expected initial quarterly
distribution, our unitholders will not be entitled to receive
such payments in the future. We will pay distributions on or
about the 15th of each February, May, August and November
to holders of record on or about the 1st of each such
month. If the distribution date does not fall on a business day,
we will make the distribution on the business day immediately
preceding the indicated distribution date. On or before
May 15, 2007 to the extent we have available cash in
accordance with the terms of our partnership agreement, we will
pay a distribution to our unitholders equal to the initial
quarterly distribution prorated for the portion of the quarter
ending
March 31, 2007 that we are public.
We do not have a legal obligation to pay distributions at our
initial distribution rate or at any other rate except as
provided in our partnership agreement. Our distribution policy
is consistent with the terms of our partnership agreement, which
requires that we distribute all of our available cash quarterly.
Under our partnership agreement, available cash is defined to
mean generally, for each fiscal quarter, all cash and cash
equivalents on the date of determination of available cash for
such quarter, less the reserves that our general partner
determines are necessary or appropriate to provide for the
conduct of our business, to comply with applicable law, any of
our debt instruments or other agreements or to provide for
future distributions to our unitholders for any one or more of
the upcoming four quarters.
48
In the sections that follow, we present in detail the basis for
our belief that we will be able to fully fund our initial
quarterly distribution of $0.40 per common unit per quarter
for the four quarters ending
December 31, 2007. In those
sections we present two tables, including:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Our “Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Available Cash,” in
which we present the amount of pro forma available cash that we
would have had available for distribution to our limited
partners and parent with respect to the year ended
December 31, 2005 and four quarters ended
September 30, 2006 based on our pro forma financial
statements included in this prospectus. Our calculation of pro
forma available cash in this table should only be viewed as a
general indication of the amount of available cash that we might
have generated had we been in existence in an earlier period.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Our “Estimated Cash Available to Pay Distributions,”
in which we present our estimate of available cash to pay
distributions for the four quarters ending December 31,
2007, which supports our belief that we will be able to fully
fund our initial annual distribution of $1.60 per common
unit during such period.
|
If we had completed the transactions contemplated in this
prospectus on
January 1, 2005, our pro forma available cash
to pay distributions for the year ended
December 31, 2005
would have been $9.9 million. This amount would have been
insufficient by approximately $23.2 million to pay the
initial annual distribution of $33.1 million on all our
common units and general partner interest. Likewise, our pro
forma available cash to pay distributions for the four quarters
ended
September 30, 2006 would have been a deficit of
$14.1 million. This amount would have been insufficient by
approximately $47.2 million to pay the initial annual
distribution amount of $33.1 million on all our common
units and general partner interest.
The pro forma financial information does not reflect certain
changes in operating assumptions and expected results that
affect our projections for the four quarters ending
December 31, 2007, including principally:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
The commencement of operations within our NGL Pipeline Services
segment. The South Texas NGL pipeline became operational in
January 2007 and is expected to generate an additional
$16.4 million of Estimated Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA
during the four quarters ending December 31, 2007. For a
definition of Estimated Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, please
read “—Estimated Cash Available to Pay
Distributions;” and
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
The funding of growth capital expenditures with sources other
than cash from operations. Because we had no external financing
of capital projects in the year ended December 31, 2005 and
the four quarters ended September 30, 2006, pro forma
available cash was reduced by $19.5 million and
$61.1 million for capital expenditures in those respective
periods. We expect that, in the future, growth capital
expenditures will be funded with sources other than cash from
operations, such as proceeds from this offering, borrowings
under our new revolving credit facility, debt or equity
financings, or contributions from Enterprise Products OLP.
|
Therefore, we believe that we will have sufficient cash
available to pay quarterly distributions of $0.40 per unit
on all our common units and our general partner interest during
the four quarters ending
December 31, 2007. See
“— Assumptions and Considerations” for the
specific assumptions underlying this belief.
The tables used in this section, “Unaudited Pro Forma
Combined Available Cash” and “Estimated Cash Available
to Pay Distributions,” have been prepared by, and are the
responsibility of our management. Our independent registered
public accounting firm has neither examined, compiled or
otherwise applied procedures to such information presented
herein and, accordingly do not express an opinion or any other
form of assurance on such information or its achievability, and
assume no responsibility for, and disclaim any association with
the prospective financial information. Such independent
registered public accounting firm’s reports included
elsewhere in this prospectus relate to the appropriately
described historical financial information. Such reports do not
extend to the tables and related information and should not be
read to do so. In addition, such tables and information were not
prepared with a view toward compliance with published guidelines
of the Securities and Exchange Commission or the guidelines
established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants for preparation and presentation of prospective
financial information, and were not prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America nor
49
were procedures applied for auditing standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Unaudited
Pro Forma Combined Available Cash
The pro forma financial statements, upon which our pro forma
combined available cash for distributions is based, do not
purport to present our results of operations had the
transactions contemplated in this prospectus actually been
completed as of the dates indicated. Furthermore, cash available
for distribution is a cash accounting concept, while our pro
forma financial statements have been prepared on an accrual
basis. We derived the amounts of pro forma combined available
cash for distribution in the manner described in the table
below. As a result, the amount of pro forma combined available
cash for distribution should be viewed as only a general
indication of the amount of cash available for distribution that
we might have generated had we been formed in earlier periods.
The following table illustrates, on a pro forma basis, for the
year ended
December 31, 2005 and for the four quarters
ended
September 30, 2006, the amount of cash that would
have been available for distribution to the holders of our
common units (including Enterprise Products Partners) and our
general partner assuming that this offering had been consummated
at the beginning of each such period. The pro forma adjustments
in the following table give effect to (i) the contribution
of 66% of the ownership interests in Mont Belvieu Caverns,
Acadian Gas, Sabine Propylene and Lou-Tex Propylene,
(ii) the revision of related party storage
contracts with
Enterprise Products Partners, including terms relating to the
allocation of measurement gains and losses, (iii) the
execution of a limited liability company agreement with Mont
Belvieu Caverns providing for special allocations to Enterprise
Products Partners, and (iv) the assignment of certain
third-party propylene transportation agreements, as if they had
occurred at the beginning of the periods presented.
50
Duncan
Energy Partners L.P.
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Available Cash
(Dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Four Quarters
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Provided by Operating
Activities(a)
|
|
$
|
40,568
|
|
|
$
|
65,643
|
|
|
Adjustments to derive
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA(a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
Equity income of unconsolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
Net effect of changes in operating
accounts(b)
|
|
|
18,280
|
|
|
|
3,204
|
|
|
Changes in fair market value of
financial instruments for Acadian Gas
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
|
Non-cash gain (loss) on sale of
assets
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Adjusted
EBITDA
|
|
|
59,654
|
|
|
|
69,596
|
|
|
Pro forma increase in storage
revenues(c)
|
|
|
11,610
|
|
|
|
12,902
|
|
|
Pro forma decrease in operating
expense due to allocation of measurement losses by parent(d)
|
|
|
3,055
|
|
|
|