AT&T Inc · S-4/A · On 6/2/06
Filed On 6/2/06 1:22pm ET · SEC File 333-132904 · Accession Number 950123-6-7322
As Of Filer Filing As/For/On Docs:Pgs Issuer Agent
6/02/06 AT&T Inc S-4/A 16:269 Bowne of NY City...01/FA
Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration of Securities Issued in a Business-Combination Transaction · Form S-4
Filing Table of Contents
Document/Exhibit Description Pages Size
1: S-4/A Amendment No. 2 to Form S-4 HTML 1,450K
2: EX-5.1 Ex-5.1: Opinion of Wayne A. Wirtz HTML 9K
3: EX-8.1 Ex-8.1: Opinion of Sullivan & Cromwell Llp HTML 9K
4: EX-8.2 Ex-8.2: Opinion of Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & HTML 14K
Jacobson Llp
5: EX-23.1 Ex-23.1: Consent of Ernst & Young Llp HTML 8K
6: EX-23.2 Ex-23.2: Consent of Pricewaterhousecoopers Llp HTML 7K
7: EX-23.3 Ex-23.3: Consent of Ernst & Young Llp HTML 7K
8: EX-23.4 Ex-23.4: Consent of Pricewaterhousecoopers Llp HTML 7K
9: EX-23.5 Ex-23.5: Consent of Pricewaterhousecoopers Llp HTML 7K
10: EX-23.6 Ex-23.6: Consent of Pricewaterhousecoopers Llp HTML 6K
11: EX-99.1 Ex-99.1: Form of Proxy Card HTML 20K
12: EX-99.2 Ex-99.2: Form of Proxy Card HTML 15K
13: EX-99.7 Ex-99.7: Consent of Lehman Brothers Inc. HTML 9K
14: EX-99.9 Ex-99.9: Consent of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. HTML 8K
15: EX-99.10 Ex-99.10: Consent of Goldman, Sachs & Co. HTML 10K
16: EX-99.12 Ex-99.12: Consolidated Shareholders' Class Action HTML 54K
Complaint
| Page | (sequential) | | | | (alphabetic) | Top |
|---|
| | |
- Alternative Formats (RTF, XML, et al.)
- Access to Corporate Records, Financial Statements and Related Matters
- Accounting Treatment
- Agreement and Plan of Merger among BellSouth Corporation, AT&T Inc. and ABC Consolidation Corp., dated as of March 4, 2006
- Alternative Acquisition Proposals
- Amendment, Extension and Waiver
- Amendments of Organizational Documents
- Annex A
- Annex B
- Annex C
- Annex D
- Annex E
- Annual Meeting of Shareholders
- Anti-Takeover and Ownership Provisions
- At&T
- AT&T Common Shares
- AT&T Preferred Shares
- AT&T s Post-Closing Directors and Officers
- AT&T s Reasons for the Merger
- Background of the Merger
- BellSouth
- BellSouth s Reasons for the Merger
- By-Law Amendments
- Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
- Certain Financial Projections
- Classes and Series of Capital Stock
- Closing and Effectiveness of the Merger
- Companies, The
- Comparative Market Data
- Comparative Per Share Market Price Data and Dividend Information
- Comparison of Shareholder Rights
- Completion of the Merger
- Conditions to Closing
- Conditions to the Merger
- Covenants and Agreements
- Description of AT&T Capital Stock
- Dissenters and Appraisal Rights
- Dissenters Rights
- Dividends
- Effect of Termination
- Effect of Termination; Termination Fees
- Expenses of Solicitation
- Experts
- Fairness Opinion of Citigroup Global Markets Inc
- Fairness Opinion of Evercore Group Inc
- Fairness Opinion of Goldman, Sachs & Co
- Fairness Opinion of Lehman Brothers Inc
- Filling Vacancies on the Board of Directors
- Financial Analyses of BellSouth s Financial Advisors
- General; Date; Time and Place
- Householding
- How to Vote
- Indemnification of Directors and Officers
- Information About the AT&T Special Meeting
- Information About the BellSouth Special Meeting
- Interests of BellSouth Executive Officers and Directors in the Merger
- Interests of BellSouth s Executive Officers and Directors in the Merger
- Legal Matters
- Limitation of Personal Liability of Directors
- Litigation Relating to the Merger
- Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences
- Merger Agreement, The
- Merger Consideration
- Merger Fees, Costs and Expenses
- Merger Sub
- Merger, The
- New Directors and Management of AT&T Following the Merger
- New York Stock Exchange Listing; Delisting and Deregistration of BellSouth Common Shares
- No Dissenters Rights
- No Shareholder Rights Plan
- Number and Qualification of Directors
- Opinions of AT&T s Financial Advisors
- Opinions of BellSouth s Financial Advisors
- Procedures for Exchange of BellSouth Common Shares for AT&T Common Shares
- Purpose of the AT&T Special Meeting
- Purpose of the Special Meeting
- Questions about Voting Your Shares
- Questions and Answers
- Quorum
- Recommendation
- Recommendation of AT&T s Board of Directors
- Recommendation of BellSouth s Board of Directors
- Recommendation of the AT&T Board of Directors
- Recommendation of the BellSouth Board of Directors
- Record Date; Voting Power
- Regulatory Matters Related to the Merger
- Removal of Directors
- Representations and Warranties
- Repurchase of AT&T Common Shares
- Required Vote
- Resale of AT&T Common Shares
- Risk Factors
- Risk Factors Relating to AT&T Following the Merger
- Risk Factors Relating to the Merger
- Selected Historical Financial Data of AT&T Inc
- Selected Historical Financial Data of BellSouth
- Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Data as of and for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2006
- Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Data as of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2005
- Shareholder Action Without a Meeting
- Shareholder Nominations and Proposals
- Shareholder Proposals
- Shareholder Rights Plan
- Special Meetings of Shareholders
- Specific Performance
- Summary
- Table of Contents
- Termination Fees and Expenses
- Termination of the Merger Agreement
- The Companies
- The Merger
- The Merger Agreement
- To Attend the AT&T Special Meeting
- To Attend the BellSouth Special Meeting
- Treatment of BellSouth Stock Options and Stock-Based Awards
- Unaudited Comparative Per Share Data for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2006
- Unaudited Comparative Per Share Data for the Year Ended December 31, 2005
- Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information as of and for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2006
- Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Income for the Year Ended December 31, 2005
- Vote on Mergers and Certain Other Transactions
- Where You Can Find More Information
|
| 1 | 1st Page
|
| " | Table of Contents
|
| " | Questions and Answers
|
| " | Summary
|
| " | The Companies
|
| " | The Merger
|
| " | Merger Consideration
|
| " | Recommendation of the AT&T Board of Directors
|
| " | Recommendation of the BellSouth Board of Directors
|
| " | Opinions of AT&T s Financial Advisors
|
| " | Opinions of BellSouth s Financial Advisors
|
| " | Treatment of BellSouth Stock Options and Stock-Based Awards
|
| " | Interests of BellSouth Executive Officers and Directors in the Merger
|
| " | Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences
|
| " | Procedures for Exchange of BellSouth Common Shares for AT&T Common Shares
|
| " | Accounting Treatment
|
| " | Regulatory Matters Related to the Merger
|
| " | Completion of the Merger
|
| " | No Dissenters Rights
|
| " | The Merger Agreement
|
| " | Alternative Acquisition Proposals
|
| " | Conditions to Closing
|
| " | Termination of the Merger Agreement
|
| " | Effect of Termination; Termination Fees
|
| " | Recommendation
|
| " | Selected Historical Financial Data of AT&T Inc
|
| " | Selected Historical Financial Data of BellSouth
|
| " | Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Data as of and for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2006
|
| " | Unaudited Comparative Per Share Data for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2006
|
| " | Unaudited Comparative Per Share Data for the Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
| " | Comparative Market Data
|
| " | Comparative Per Share Market Price Data and Dividend Information
|
| " | Risk Factors
|
| " | Risk Factors Relating to the Merger
|
| " | Risk Factors Relating to AT&T Following the Merger
|
| " | BellSouth
|
| " | At&T
|
| " | Merger Sub
|
| " | Background of the Merger
|
| " | AT&T s Reasons for the Merger
|
| " | BellSouth s Reasons for the Merger
|
| " | Certain Financial Projections
|
| " | Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information as of and for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2006
|
| " | Financial Analyses of BellSouth s Financial Advisors
|
| " | Interests of BellSouth s Executive Officers and Directors in the Merger
|
| " | Merger Fees, Costs and Expenses
|
| " | Dissenters Rights
|
| " | Resale of AT&T Common Shares
|
| " | Repurchase of AT&T Common Shares
|
| " | New York Stock Exchange Listing; Delisting and Deregistration of BellSouth Common Shares
|
| " | Litigation Relating to the Merger
|
| " | Information About the AT&T Special Meeting
|
| " | General; Date; Time and Place
|
| " | Purpose of the AT&T Special Meeting
|
| " | Record Date; Voting Power
|
| " | Required Vote
|
| " | Recommendation of AT&T s Board of Directors
|
| " | Quorum
|
| " | How to Vote
|
| " | To Attend the AT&T Special Meeting
|
| " | Expenses of Solicitation
|
| " | Questions about Voting Your Shares
|
| " | Information About the BellSouth Special Meeting
|
| " | Purpose of the Special Meeting
|
| " | Recommendation of BellSouth s Board of Directors
|
| " | Householding
|
| " | To Attend the BellSouth Special Meeting
|
| " | Closing and Effectiveness of the Merger
|
| " | AT&T s Post-Closing Directors and Officers
|
| " | Representations and Warranties
|
| " | Covenants and Agreements
|
| " | Conditions to the Merger
|
| " | Effect of Termination
|
| " | Termination Fees and Expenses
|
| " | Amendment, Extension and Waiver
|
| " | Specific Performance
|
| " | Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Income for the Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
| " | New Directors and Management of AT&T Following the Merger
|
| " | Description of AT&T Capital Stock
|
| " | AT&T Common Shares
|
| " | AT&T Preferred Shares
|
| " | No Shareholder Rights Plan
|
| " | Comparison of Shareholder Rights
|
| " | Classes and Series of Capital Stock
|
| " | Annual Meeting of Shareholders
|
| " | Special Meetings of Shareholders
|
| " | Shareholder Action Without a Meeting
|
| " | Shareholder Nominations and Proposals
|
| " | Access to Corporate Records, Financial Statements and Related Matters
|
| " | Amendments of Organizational Documents
|
| " | By-Law Amendments
|
| " | Dividends
|
| " | Dissenters and Appraisal Rights
|
| " | Number and Qualification of Directors
|
| " | Filling Vacancies on the Board of Directors
|
| " | Removal of Directors
|
| " | Limitation of Personal Liability of Directors
|
| " | Indemnification of Directors and Officers
|
| " | Shareholder Rights Plan
|
| " | Vote on Mergers and Certain Other Transactions
|
| " | Anti-Takeover and Ownership Provisions
|
| " | Experts
|
| " | Legal Matters
|
| " | Shareholder Proposals
|
| " | Where You Can Find More Information
|
| " | Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
|
| " | Annex A
|
| " | Agreement and Plan of Merger among BellSouth Corporation, AT&T Inc. and ABC Consolidation Corp., dated as of March 4, 2006
|
| " | Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Data as of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
| " | Annex B
|
| " | Fairness Opinion of Lehman Brothers Inc
|
| " | Annex C
|
| " | Fairness Opinion of Evercore Group Inc
|
| " | Annex D
|
| " | Fairness Opinion of Citigroup Global Markets Inc
|
| " | Annex E
|
| " | Fairness Opinion of Goldman, Sachs & Co
|
This is an EDGAR HTML document rendered as filed. [ Alternative Formats ]
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 2, 2006
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Amendment No. 2
to
Form S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
AT&T INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
4813 |
|
43-1301883 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number) |
|
(IRS Employer
Identification Number) |
175 East Houston
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)
Ann Effinger Meuleman
AT&T Inc.
175 East Houston
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
Copies to:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph B. Frumkin, Esq.
Eric M. Krautheimer, Esq.
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004
Tel: (212) 558-4000
Fax: (212) 558-3588 |
|
Wayne A. Wirtz, Esq.
AT&T Inc.
175 East Houston
San Antonio, Texas 78205
Tel: (210) 821-4105
Fax: (210) 351-3467 |
|
Stacey K. Geer, Esq.
BellSouth Corporation
1155 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Tel: (404) 249-4445
Fax: (404) 249-4766 |
|
Arthur Fleischer, Jr., Esq.
Philip Richter, Esq.
Fried, Frank, Harris,
Shriver & Jacobson LLP
One New York Plaza
New York, New York 10004
Tel: (212) 859-8000
Fax: (212) 859-4000 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after this registration
statement becomes effective and upon completion of the
transactions described in the enclosed prospectus.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being
offered in connection with the formation of a holding company
and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the
following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
The registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until this Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
| |
|
|
|
PROXY STATEMENT |
|
PROXY STATEMENT |
|
AND PROSPECTUS OF AT&T INC. |
|
OF BELLSOUTH CORPORATION |
| |
 |
|
 |
Dear Shareholders:
The boards of directors of AT&T and BellSouth have agreed to
combine in a merger that will result in a more effective and
efficient provider of wireless, broadband, video, voice, data
and directory services. It will also put control of Cingular
Wireless in one company. We are very excited about the prospects
for the combined company.
If the merger is completed, BellSouth shareholders will receive
1.325 AT&T common shares for each BellSouth common share
held immediately prior to the merger.
Based on the closing price of $27.99 per AT&T common
share on the New York Stock Exchange on
March 3, 2006, the
last trading day before the public announcement of the merger,
the 1.325 exchange ratio represented approximately
$37.09 per BellSouth common share, a 17.9% premium over the
closing price of the BellSouth common shares on the NYSE on
March 3, 2006. Based on the closing price of $26.91 per
AT&T common share on the NYSE on
June 1, 2006, the
latest practicable date before the printing of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, the total merger consideration was valued
at approximately $35.66 per BellSouth common share. Because the
number of AT&T common shares to be issued in exchange for
each BellSouth common share is fixed, the actual value of the
merger consideration that BellSouth shareholders will receive at
the time of the merger for each BellSouth common share will
depend on the price per AT&T common share at that time.
Based on the estimated number of BellSouth common shares
outstanding on the record date for the meetings, AT&T
expects to issue approximately 2,400,000,000 AT&T common
shares to BellSouth shareholders in the merger. Former BellSouth
shareholders are expected to own approximately 38% of the
AT&T common shares outstanding immediately after the merger.
AT&T common shares are quoted on the NYSE under the symbol
“T”. BellSouth common shares are quoted on the NYSE
under the symbol
“BLS”.
Each company is holding a special meeting of shareholders in
order to obtain the shareholder approvals necessary to complete
the merger as more fully described in this joint proxy
statement/ prospectus. The accompanying joint proxy
statement/prospectus provides a detailed description of the
proposed merger and the merger consideration. In addition, it
provides you with important information regarding these
meetings.
We urge you to read the enclosed materials (and any
documents incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/ prospectus) carefully. Please pay particular
attention to the “Risk Factors” section beginning on
page 17.
We cannot complete the merger unless the shareholders of both of
our companies approve proposals related to the merger. Your
vote is very important, regardless of the number of shares you
own. Whether or not you expect to attend either special meeting,
please vote all proxy cards that you receive as soon as possible
to ensure that your shares are represented at the applicable
special meeting. If you are a BellSouth shareholder, please note
that a failure to vote your shares is the equivalent of a vote
against the merger. If you are an AT&T shareholder,
please note that a failure to vote your shares may result in an
insufficient number of shares being voted at the AT&T
special meeting for the proposal to issue AT&T common shares
to be approved. Registered and many broker-managed shareholders
can vote their shares by using a toll-free telephone number or
the Internet. Instructions for using these convenient services
are provided on the accompanying proxy card. Of course, you may
still vote your shares by marking your votes on the accompanying
proxy card, signing and dating it and mailing it in the envelope
provided. If you sign and return your proxy card without
specifying your choices, it will be understood that you wish to
have your shares voted in accordance with your board of
directors’ recommendations. If you are a shareholder of
both AT&T and BellSouth, you will receive two separate
packages of proxy materials. Please sign, date and return
all proxy cards that you receive, whether from AT&T
or BellSouth, or vote as either an AT&T or BellSouth
shareholder by Internet or telephone. If you have any questions
or need assistance voting your shares, please call
D.F. King & Co., Inc., who is assisting
AT&T, toll free at
(800) 431-9643 or
collect at
(212) 269-5550, if
you are an AT&T shareholder, or Morrow & Co.,
Inc., who is assisting BellSouth, toll free at
(877) 366-1576, if
you are a BellSouth shareholder.
The AT&T board of directors recommends that AT&T
shareholders vote “FOR” the proposal to authorize the
issuance of AT&T common shares required to be issued to
BellSouth shareholders pursuant to the merger agreement. The
BellSouth board of directors recommends that BellSouth
shareholders vote “FOR” the proposal to approve the
merger agreement.
Sincerely,
| |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
F. Duane Ackerman |
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|
AT&T Inc.
|
|
BellSouth Corporation |
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) nor any state securities commission has
approved or disapproved of the securities to be issued in
connection with the merger or passed upon the adequacy or
accuracy of this document. Any representation to the contrary is
a criminal offense.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated June 2,
2006 and is expected to be first mailed to AT&T’s
shareholders on or about June 7, 2006 and to
BellSouth’s shareholders on or about June 8,
2006.
REFERENCE TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This joint proxy statement/ prospectus incorporates by reference
important business and financial information about AT&T and
BellSouth from documents that are not included in or delivered
with this joint proxy statement/prospectus. For a listing of the
documents incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/ prospectus, see
“Where You Can Find More
Information” beginning on page 136. This information
is available to you without charge upon your written or oral
request. You can obtain documents related to AT&T and
BellSouth that are
incorporated by reference into this joint
proxy statement/ prospectus, without charge, from the SEC’s
Web site (
www.sec.gov) or by requesting them in writing or
by telephone from the appropriate company.
(All
Web site addresses given in this joint proxy statement/
prospectus are for information only and are not intended to be
an active link or to incorporate any
Web site information into
this joint proxy statement/ prospectus.)
Please note that copies of the documents provided to you will
not include exhibits, unless the exhibits are specifically
incorporated by reference into the documents or this joint proxy
statement/ prospectus.
In order to receive timely delivery of requested documents in
advance of the special meetings, you should make your request no
later than July 14, 2006.
ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT
This document, which forms part of a registration statement on
Form
S-4 filed
with the SEC by AT&T (File
No.
333-132904),
constitutes a prospectus of AT&T under Section 5 of the
Securities Act of 1933, which we refer to as the Securities Act,
with respect to the AT&T common shares to be issued to
BellSouth shareholders as required by the merger agreement. This
document also constitutes a joint proxy statement under
Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which
we refer to as the Exchange Act. It also constitutes a notice of
meeting with respect to the special meeting of AT&T
shareholders, at which AT&T’s shareholders will be
asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to authorize the
issuance of AT&T common shares required to be issued to
BellSouth shareholders pursuant to the merger agreement, and a
notice of meeting with respect to the special meeting of
BellSouth shareholders, at which BellSouth’s shareholders
will be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve
the merger agreement.
ii
AT&T INC.
175 E. Houston
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To AT&T Shareholders:
A special meeting of shareholders of AT&T Inc., a Delaware
corporation (
“AT&T”), will be held at
3:00 p.m. Central time on Friday,
July 21, 2006, at the
Charline McCombs Empire Theatre, 226 North
St. Mary’s Street, San Antonio, Texas, for the
following purposes:
|
|
|
| |
• |
To consider and vote upon a proposal to authorize the issuance
of AT&T common shares required to be issued in the merger of
ABC Consolidation Corp., a Georgia corporation and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of AT&T (“Merger Sub”),
with and into BellSouth Corporation, a Georgia corporation, as
contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
March 4, 2006, by and among BellSouth, AT&T and Merger
Sub, as that agreement may be amended; and |
| |
| |
• |
To conduct any other business as may properly come before the
special meeting or any properly reconvened meeting following an
adjournment or postponement of the special meeting. |
Holders of record of AT&T common shares at the close of
business on
June 1, 2006, are entitled to vote at the
special meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the
special meeting. A list of these shareholders will be available
for inspection during business hours from July 7 through
July 20, 2006, at 175 E. Houston,
San Antonio, Texas, and will also be available at the
special meeting.
Your vote is very important. Your proxy is being solicited by
the AT&T Board of Directors. The issuance of new shares of
AT&T common shares must be authorized by the shareholders of
AT&T in order for the merger to be completed.
|
|
| |
By Order of the AT&T Board of Directors. |
|
|
| |
Ann Effinger Meuleman |
| |
Vice President and Secretary |
| |
AT&T Inc. |
|
|
| |
June 2, 2006 |
|
|
IMPORTANT NOTICE
If you do not plan to attend the special meeting to vote your
shares, please complete, date, sign and promptly mail the
enclosed proxy card in the return envelope provided. No postage
is necessary if mailed in the United States. Shareholders of
record and many broker-managed shareholders may also give their
proxy by telephone or through the Internet in accordance with
the instructions accompanying the proxy card. Any person giving
a proxy has the power to revoke it at any time, and shareholders
who are present at the meeting may withdraw their proxies and
vote in person.
iii
BellSouth Corporation
1155 Peachtree Street, N.E.
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To BellSouth Shareholders:
A special meeting of shareholders of BellSouth Corporation, a
Georgia corporation (
“BellSouth”), will be held at
11:00 a.m. Eastern time on Friday,
July 21, 2006, at the
Cobb Galleria Centre, 2 Galleria Parkway,
Atlanta,
Georgia
30339, for the following purposes:
|
|
|
| |
• |
To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 4, 2006, by and among
BellSouth, AT&T Inc. and a wholly-owned subsidiary of
AT&T, as that agreement may be amended; and |
| |
| |
• |
To conduct any other business that may properly come before the
special meeting or any properly reconvened meeting following an
adjournment or postponement of the special meeting. |
Holders of record of BellSouth common shares at the close of
business on
June 1, 2006 are entitled to vote at the special
meeting and any adjournment of the special meeting. Your shares
can be voted at the special meeting only if you are present or
represented by a valid proxy. Shareholders who owned BellSouth
common shares as of the record date will be admitted to the
special meeting with verification of ownership, such as an
account statement or a valid admission card as attached to the
proxy card.
Your vote is important. Please vote as soon as possible
in one of the following ways, even if you plan to attend the
meeting:
|
|
|
| |
• |
By Internet — visit the website on the proxy
card or in your e-mail
notice; or |
| |
| |
• |
By telephone — use the toll-free telephone
number on the proxy card; or |
| |
| |
• |
By mail — mark, sign, date and promptly return
the enclosed proxy card(s) in the postage-paid envelope. |
You may also submit a ballot at the special meeting on
July
21, 2006.
By Order of the BellSouth Board of Directors.
|
|
| |
Rebecca M. Dunn |
| |
Senior Vice President — Corporate Compliance and
Corporate Secretary |
| |
BellSouth Corporation |
|
|
| |
June 2, 2006 |
|
|
IMPORTANT NOTICE
For the merger agreement to be approved by BellSouth
shareholders, a majority of the outstanding BellSouth common
shares must be voted in favor of approval of the merger
agreement. Accordingly, if you do not vote your BellSouth common
shares, it will have the same effect as a vote against approval
of the merger agreement and the merger. Please vote your
shares.
If you do not plan to attend the special meeting to vote your
shares, please complete, date, sign and promptly mail the
enclosed proxy card(s) in the return envelope provided. No
postage is necessary if mailed in the United States.
Shareholders of record and many broker-managed shareholders may
also give their proxy by telephone or through the Internet in
accordance with the instructions accompanying the proxy card(s).
Any person giving a proxy has the power to revoke it at any
time, and shareholders who are present at the meeting may
withdraw their proxies and vote in person.
Please do not send share certificates at this time. If the
merger is completed, you will be sent instructions regarding the
surrender of your share certificates.
iv
v
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Attend the AT&T Special
Meeting |
|
|
71 |
|
|
Expenses of Solicitation |
|
|
71 |
|
|
Questions about Voting Your
Shares |
|
|
71 |
|
|
Information About the BellSouth Special
Meeting |
|
|
72 |
|
|
General; Date; Time and Place |
|
|
72 |
|
|
Purpose of the Special Meeting |
|
|
72 |
|
|
Record Date; Voting Power |
|
|
72 |
|
|
Required Vote |
|
|
72 |
|
|
Recommendation of BellSouth’s
Board of Directors |
|
|
73 |
|
|
Quorum |
|
|
73 |
|
|
How to Vote |
|
|
73 |
|
|
Householding |
|
|
74 |
|
|
To Attend the BellSouth Special
Meeting |
|
|
74 |
|
|
Expenses of Solicitation |
|
|
75 |
|
|
Questions about Voting Your
Shares |
|
|
75 |
|
|
The Merger Agreement |
|
|
76 |
|
|
The Merger |
|
|
76 |
|
|
Closing and Effectiveness of the
Merger |
|
|
76 |
|
|
AT&T’s Post-Closing
Directors and Officers |
|
|
76 |
|
|
Merger Consideration |
|
|
77 |
|
|
Representations and Warranties |
|
|
78 |
|
|
Covenants and Agreements |
|
|
79 |
|
|
Conditions to the Merger |
|
|
91 |
|
|
Termination of the Merger
Agreement |
|
|
94 |
|
|
Effect of Termination |
|
|
95 |
|
|
Termination Fees and Expenses |
|
|
95 |
|
|
Amendment, Extension and Waiver |
|
|
97 |
|
|
Specific Performance |
|
|
97 |
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Financial Information as of and for the Quarter Ended
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
98 |
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Statement of Income for the Year Ended December 31,
2005 |
|
|
109 |
|
|
New Directors and Management of AT&T
Following the Merger |
|
|
118 |
|
|
Description of AT&T Capital
Stock |
|
|
119 |
|
|
AT&T Common Shares |
|
|
119 |
|
|
AT&T Preferred Shares |
|
|
119 |
|
|
No Shareholder Rights Plan |
|
|
119 |
|
|
Comparison of Shareholder Rights |
|
|
120 |
|
|
Classes and Series of Capital
Stock |
|
|
120 |
|
|
Annual Meeting of Shareholders |
|
|
120 |
|
|
Special Meetings of Shareholders |
|
|
121 |
|
|
Shareholder Action Without a
Meeting |
|
|
122 |
|
|
Shareholder Nominations and
Proposals |
|
|
122 |
|
|
Access to Corporate Records,
Financial Statements and Related Matters |
|
|
124 |
|
|
Amendments of Organizational
Documents |
|
|
125 |
|
|
By-Law Amendments |
|
|
125 |
|
|
Dividends |
|
|
126 |
|
|
Dissenters’ and Appraisal
Rights |
|
|
126 |
|
|
Number and Qualification of
Directors |
|
|
127 |
|
|
Filling Vacancies on the Board of
Directors |
|
|
128 |
|
|
Removal of Directors |
|
|
128 |
|
|
Limitation of Personal Liability of
Directors |
|
|
129 |
|
|
Indemnification of Directors and
Officers |
|
|
129 |
|
|
Shareholder Rights Plan |
|
|
130 |
|
|
Vote on Mergers and Certain Other
Transactions |
|
|
131 |
|
|
Anti-Takeover and Ownership
Provisions |
|
|
132 |
|
|
Experts |
|
|
135 |
|
|
Legal Matters |
|
|
135 |
|
|
Shareholder Proposals |
|
|
135 |
|
|
Where You Can Find More
Information |
|
|
136 |
|
|
Cautionary Statement Concerning
Forward-Looking Statements |
|
|
137 |
|
| |
|
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger among
BellSouth Corporation, AT&T Inc. and ABC Consolidation
Corp., dated as of March 4, 2006 |
|
|
A-1 |
|
|
|
|
Fairness Opinion of Lehman Brothers
Inc. |
|
|
B-1 |
|
|
|
|
Fairness Opinion of Evercore Group
Inc. |
|
|
C-1 |
|
|
|
|
Fairness Opinion of Citigroup Global
Markets Inc. |
|
|
D-1 |
|
|
|
|
Fairness Opinion of Goldman,
Sachs & Co. |
|
|
E-1 |
|
| EX-5.1: OPINION OF WAYNE A. WIRTZ |
| EX-8.1: OPINION OF SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP |
| EX-8.2: OPINION OF FRIED, FRANK, HARRIS, SHRIVER & JACOBSON LLP |
| EX-23.1: CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
| EX-23.2: CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP |
| EX-23.3: CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
| EX-23.4: CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP |
| EX-23.5: CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP |
| EX-23.6: CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP |
| EX-99.1: FORM OF PROXY CARD |
| EX-99.2: FORM OF PROXY CARD |
| EX-99.7: CONSENT OF LEHMAN BROTHERS INC. |
| EX-99.9: CONSENT OF CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC. |
| EX-99.10: CONSENT OF GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO. |
| EX-99.12: CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDERS' CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT |
vi
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
The following are some of the questions that you, as a
shareholder of AT&T or BellSouth, may have, and answers to
those questions. These questions and answers, as well as the
following summary, are not meant to be a substitute for the
information contained in the remainder of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, and this information is qualified in its
entirety by the more detailed descriptions and explanations
contained elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. We
urge you to read this joint proxy statement/prospectus in its
entirety prior to making any decision.
|
|
|
|
Q1: |
|
Why am I receiving this joint proxy statement/prospectus? |
| |
|
A1: |
|
AT&T and BellSouth have agreed to combine their respective
businesses by means of a merger. We expect the combined company
will be a more effective and efficient provider in the wireless,
broadband, video, voice and data markets. It will also put
control of Cingular Wireless in one company. |
| |
|
|
|
AT&T is holding a special meeting of shareholders in order
to obtain the shareholder approval necessary to issue AT&T
common shares in the merger, as described in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. BellSouth is holding a special meeting of
shareholders in order to obtain shareholder approval of the
merger agreement, as described in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. |
| |
|
|
|
We will be unable to complete the merger unless AT&T and
BellSouth shareholders approve these proposals at their
respective special meetings. |
| |
|
|
|
We have included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus
important information about the merger, the merger agreement and
the special meetings of the shareholders of AT&T and
BellSouth. You should read this information carefully and in its
entirety. We have attached a copy of the merger agreement as
Annex A. The enclosed voting materials allow you to vote
your shares without attending the applicable special meeting.
Your vote is very important and we encourage you to vote your
proxy as soon as possible. |
| |
|
Q2: |
|
What will I receive in the merger? |
| |
|
A2: |
|
If the merger is completed, BellSouth shareholders will receive
1.325 AT&T common shares for each BellSouth common share
held immediately prior to the merger. |
| |
|
|
|
Holders of BellSouth common shares will not receive any
fractional AT&T common shares in the merger. Instead, the
total number of AT&T common shares that each BellSouth
shareholder will receive in the merger will be rounded down to
the nearest whole number, and AT&T will pay cash for the
remaining fractional AT&T common share that a BellSouth
shareholder would otherwise be entitled to receive. The amount
of cash payable for a fractional AT&T common share will be
determined by multiplying the fraction by the average closing
price for an AT&T common share for the five trading days
ending on the trading day immediately prior to the completion of
the merger. |
| |
|
|
|
AT&T shareholders will continue to hold their AT&T
common shares. |
| |
|
Q3: |
|
How do I calculate the value of the merger consideration? |
| |
|
|
|
A3: |
|
BellSouth shareholders will receive merger consideration
consisting of a fixed number of 1.325 AT&T common shares for
each BellSouth common share they own. Based on the closing price
of $27.99 per AT&T common share on the New York Stock
Exchange, which we refer to as the NYSE, on March 3, 2006,
the last trading day before the public announcement of the
merger, the exchange ratio represented approximately
$37.09 per BellSouth common share, a 17.9% premium over the
closing price of BellSouth common shares on the NYSE on
March 3, 2006. Based on the closing price of $26.91 per
share of AT&T common shares on the NYSE on June 1,
2006, the latest practicable date before the printing of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus, the exchange ratio represented
approximately $35.66 per BellSouth common share. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Because AT&T will issue a fixed number of AT&T common
shares in exchange for each BellSouth common share, the value of
the merger consideration that BellSouth shareholders will
receive in the merger for each BellSouth common share will
depend on the price per AT&T common share at the |
vii
|
|
|
|
|
|
time the merger is completed. That price will not be known at
the time of the meeting and may be less than the current price
or the price at the time of the meeting. Former BellSouth
shareholders are currently expected to own approximately 38% of
the AT&T common shares outstanding immediately after the
merger. |
| |
|
Q4: |
|
What is required to complete the merger? |
| |
|
|
|
A4: |
|
We are not required to complete the merger unless a number of
conditions are satisfied or waived. These conditions include
receipt of shareholder approvals, receipt of the approval of the
Federal Communications Commission, which we refer to as the FCC,
and other regulatory consents, expiration of the waiting period
under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, which we refer to as the
HSR Act, and receipt of legal opinions that the merger will
be treated for federal income tax purposes as a reorganization
within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we refer to as the Code.
For a more complete summary of the conditions that must be
satisfied or waived prior to completion of the merger, see
“The Merger Agreement — Conditions to the
Merger” beginning on page 91. |
|
|
| |
|
Q5: |
|
When and where will the special meetings be held? |
| |
|
|
|
A5: |
|
The AT&T special meeting is scheduled to be held at
3:00 p.m. Central time, at the Charline McCombs Empire
Theatre, 226 North St. Mary’s Street,
San Antonio, Texas, on July 21, 2006. The BellSouth
special meeting is scheduled to be held at 11:00 a.m.
Eastern time at the Cobb Galleria Centre, 2 Galleria
Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia, on July 21, 2006. |
|
|
| |
|
Q6: |
|
Who is entitled to vote at the AT&T and BellSouth special
meetings? |
| |
|
|
|
A6: |
|
AT&T has fixed June 1, 2006 as the record date for the
AT&T special meeting. If you were an AT&T shareholder at
the close of business on the record date, you are entitled to
vote on matters that come before the AT&T special meeting.
However, an AT&T shareholder may only vote his or her shares
if he or she is present in person or is represented by proxy at
the AT&T special meeting. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BellSouth has fixed June 1, 2006 as the record date for the
BellSouth special meeting. If you were a BellSouth shareholder
at the close of business on the record date, you are entitled to
vote on matters that come before the BellSouth special meeting.
However, a BellSouth shareholder may only vote his or her shares
if he or she is present in person or is represented by proxy at
the BellSouth special meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q7: |
|
I hold my shares in “street name”. How
are my shares voted? |
| |
|
A7: |
|
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a
bank or other nominee, you are considered the “beneficial
holder” of the shares held for you in what is known as
“street name.” If this is the case, this joint proxy
statement/ prospectus has been forwarded to you by your
brokerage firm, bank or other nominee, or their agent. As the
beneficial holder, you have the right to direct your broker,
bank or other nominee as to how to vote your shares. If you
do not provide your broker, bank or other nominee with
instructions on how to vote your “street name” shares,
your broker, bank or other nominee will not be permitted to vote
them on either the proposal to authorize the issuance of
AT&T common shares in the merger if you are an AT&T
shareholder or the proposal to approve the merger agreement if
you are a BellSouth shareholder. You should therefore be sure to
provide your broker, bank or other nominee with instructions on
how to vote your shares. |
|
|
|
|
Q8: |
|
How do I vote? |
| |
|
|
|
A8: |
|
If you are entitled to vote at your company’s special
meeting, you can vote in person by completing a ballot at the
special meeting, or you can vote by proxy before the special
meeting. Even if you plan to attend your company’s special
meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares by proxy as soon
as possible. After carefully reading and considering the
information contained in this joint proxy statement/ prospectus,
please submit your proxy by telephone or Internet in accordance
with the instructions set forth on the enclosed proxy card, or
fill out, sign and date the proxy card, and then mail your
signed proxy card in the enclosed envelope as soon as possible
so that your shares may be voted at your company’s special
meeting. For detailed information, please see “Information
About the AT&T Special Meeting — How to Vote”
beginning on page 70 and “Information About the
BellSouth Special Meeting — How to Vote”
beginning on page 73. The vote required to approve
the |
|
|
viii
|
|
|
|
|
|
merger agreement at the BellSouth special meeting is a
majority of the outstanding BellSouth common shares.
Accordingly, a BellSouth shareholder’s failure to vote his
or her BellSouth common shares will have the same effect as a
vote of those shares against the proposal to approve the merger
agreement. |
| |
|
Q9: |
|
How many votes do I have? |
| |
|
|
|
A9: |
|
You are entitled to one vote for each AT&T common share that
you owned as of the record date. As of the close of business
on May 31, 2006, there were approximately
3,883,378,517 outstanding AT&T common shares. As of that
date, less than 1% of the outstanding AT&T common shares
were held by the directors and executive officers of AT&T.
You are entitled to one vote for each BellSouth common share
that you owned as of the record date. As of the close of
business on May 31, 2006, there were 1,825,692,542
outstanding BellSouth common shares. As of that date, less than
1% of the outstanding BellSouth common shares were held by the
directors and executive officers of BellSouth. |
|
|
| |
|
Q10: |
|
What if I hold shares in both AT&T and BellSouth? |
| |
|
A10: |
|
If you are a shareholder of both AT&T and BellSouth, you
will receive two separate packages of proxy materials. A vote
as a BellSouth shareholder for the proposal to approve the
merger agreement will not constitute a vote as an AT&T
shareholder for the proposal to authorize the issuance of
AT&T common shares required to be issued in the merger, or
vice versa. THEREFORE, PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN ALL PROXY
CARDS THAT YOU RECEIVE, WHETHER FROM AT&T OR BELLSOUTH, OR
VOTE AS BOTH AN AT&T AND BELLSOUTH SHAREHOLDER BY INTERNET
OR TELEPHONE. |
|
|
|
|
Q11: |
|
How are my employee plan shares voted? |
| |
|
|
|
A11: |
|
For Employees of AT&T: In certain cases, the proxy
card, or a proxy submitted by telephone or through the Internet,
will also serve as voting instructions to the plan administrator
or trustee for shares held on behalf of a participant under
certain employee benefit plans, described on page 70. To
ensure that all shares are voted, please sign and return every
proxy card received or submit a proxy by telephone or through
the Internet for each proxy card. To allow sufficient time for
voting by the trustees of the plans, participants in AT&T
employee benefit plans must provide voting instructions to the
trustees no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on Tuesday,
July 18, 2006. For more information about the voting of
plan shares by the trustees of the AT&T employee benefit
plans, see “Information About the AT&T Special
Meeting — How to Vote” on page 70. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
For Employees of BellSouth: If you are a registered
shareholder of BellSouth and/or you own BellSouth common shares
through a BellSouth employee benefit plan, and the accounts are
in the same name, you will receive a proxy card representing
your combined directly-owned and plan-owned shares that will
serve as voting instructions to the designated BellSouth proxy,
if applicable, and also to the trustees of those plans. To allow
sufficient time for voting by the trustees of the plans,
participants in BellSouth employee benefit plans must provide
voting instructions to the trustees no later than 5:00 p.m.
Eastern time on Tuesday, July 18, 2006. For more
information about the voting of plan shares by the trustees of
the BellSouth employee benefit plans, see “Information
About the BellSouth Special Meeting — How to
Vote” on page 73. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
For Employees of Cingular: If you own BellSouth and/or
AT&T common shares through the Cingular Wireless 401(k)
Savings Plan, and you are also a registered BellSouth and/or
AT&T shareholder with your account in the same name, you
will receive a proxy card representing the combined BellSouth
common shares and a proxy card representing the combined
AT&T common shares, each of which will serve as voting
instructions to the applicable designated proxy, and also to the
trustees of that plan. To allow sufficient time for voting by
the trustees of the plans, participants in the Cingular Wireless
401(k) Savings Plan who hold AT&T or BellSouth shares
through that plan must provide voting instructions to the
trustees no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on Tuesday,
July 18, 2006. For more information about the voting of
plan shares by the trustees of the Cingular Wireless 401(k)
Savings Plan, see “Information About the AT&T Special
Meeting — How |
|
|
ix
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Vote” on page 70 and “Information About the
BellSouth Special Meeting — How to Vote” on
page 73. |
|
|
| |
|
Q12: |
|
What constitutes a quorum? |
| |
|
A12: |
|
Shareholders who hold at least 40% of the AT&T outstanding
common shares as of the close of business on the record date and
who are entitled to vote must be present or represented by proxy
in order to constitute a quorum to conduct business at the
AT&T special meeting under AT&T’s corporate
by-laws. |
| |
|
|
|
Shareholders who hold at least 40% of the outstanding BellSouth
common shares as of the close of business on the record date
must be present, either in person or represented by proxy, in
order for there to be a quorum necessary to conduct the
BellSouth special meeting. |
| |
|
Q13: |
|
What vote is required to approve each proposal? |
| |
|
A13: |
|
To authorize the issuance of AT&T common shares as
required by the merger agreement: the affirmative vote
of the holders of a majority of AT&T common shares voting on
the proposal, so long as a majority of the AT&T common
shares outstanding is voted, is required to approve the proposal
to authorize the issuance of AT&T common shares required to
be issued pursuant to the merger agreement. Brokers, banks or
other nominees holding AT&T common shares as nominees will
not have discretionary authority to vote those shares in the
absence of instructions from the beneficial owners of those
shares. |
| |
|
|
|
To approve the merger agreement: the affirmative
vote of the holders of a majority of outstanding BellSouth
common shares entitled to vote is required to approve the merger
agreement. Because the affirmative vote required to approve
the merger agreement is based upon the total number of
outstanding BellSouth shares, the failure to submit a proxy card
(or to submit a proxy by telephone or by Internet or to vote in
person at the BellSouth special meeting) or the abstention from
voting by a shareholder will have the same effect as a vote
against approval of the merger agreement. Brokers, banks or
other nominees holding BellSouth common shares as nominees will
not have discretionary authority to vote those shares in the
absence of instructions from the beneficial owners of those
shares, so the failure to provide voting instructions to your
broker, bank or nominee will also have the same effect as a vote
against approval of the merger agreement. |
| |
|
Q14: |
|
What are the recommendations of the AT&T and BellSouth
boards of directors? |
| |
|
A14: |
|
Each board of directors has approved and adopted the merger
agreement, approved the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, including the merger, and determined that these
transactions are in the best interests of its shareholders. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
The AT&T board of directors recommends that AT&T
shareholders vote “FOR” the proposal to
authorize the issuance of AT&T common shares required to be
issued pursuant to the merger agreement. See “The
Merger — AT&T’s Reasons for the Merger”
beginning on page 27 and “The Merger —
Recommendation of the AT&T Board of Directors” on
page 29. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
The BellSouth board of directors recommends that BellSouth
shareholders vote “FOR” the proposal to approve
the merger agreement. See “The Merger —
BellSouth’s Reasons for the Merger” beginning on
page 29 and “The Merger — Recommendation of
the BellSouth Board of Directors” on page 33. |
|
|
| |
|
Q15: |
|
What if I return my proxy card but do not mark it to show how
I am voting? |
| |
|
A15: |
|
If your proxy card is signed and returned without specifying
your choices, your shares will be voted in favor of the merger
in accordance with the recommendations of the AT&T or
BellSouth board of directors, as the case may be. |
| |
|
Q16: |
|
Can I change my vote after I have submitted a proxy by
telephone or Internet or mailed my signed proxy card? |
| |
|
A16: |
|
Yes. You can change your vote by revoking your proxy at any time
before it is exercised at the AT&T or BellSouth special
meeting. |
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can revoke your proxy in one of three ways: (1) vote
again by telephone or Internet prior to midnight on the night
before the special meeting; (2) sign another proxy card
with a later date and return it prior to the special meeting;
(3) attend the AT&T or BellSouth special meeting and
complete a ballot; or (4) send a written notice of
revocation to the secretary of AT&T or BellSouth. |
| |
|
Q17: |
|
What will happen to the dividend on AT&T and BellSouth
common shares following completion of the merger? |
| |
|
A17: |
|
If the merger is completed, holders of AT&T common shares
will continue to receive their dividends, if any, as they have
been receiving them from AT&T prior to the merger. After the
closing, former BellSouth shareholders who were holders of
uncertificated BellSouth common shares, or who were holders of
certificated BellSouth common shares and have surrendered their
BellSouth share certificates according to the instructions
provided to them, will receive the same dividends on the
AT&T shares that they receive in the merger that all other
holders will receive on AT&T common shares with any dividend
record date that occurs after the merger is completed. Former
BellSouth shareholders who hold BellSouth share certificates
will not be entitled to receive dividends otherwise payable on
the AT&T common shares into which their BellSouth shares are
exchangeable until they surrender their BellSouth share
certificates according to the instructions provided to them.
Dividends will be accrued for these shareholders and they will
receive the accrued dividends when they surrender their
BellSouth share certificates subject to abandoned property laws. |
| |
|
|
|
AT&T most recently paid a quarterly dividend on May 1,
2006, in an amount equal to $0.3325 per AT&T common share.
BellSouth most recently paid a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per
BellSouth common share on May 1, 2006. If the merger had
been completed before the record date for that dividend payable
on an AT&T common share, the 1.325 AT&T common shares
that a BellSouth shareholder would have received in the merger
for each BellSouth common share would have entitled that
shareholder to receive a dividend of $0.4406, a 52% increase
over BellSouth’s most recently paid quarterly dividend. All
future dividends on AT&T common shares remain subject to
approval by the AT&T board of directors, and may be more or
less than prior dividends and there can be no assurance that
dividends will continue to be paid. |
| |
|
Q18: |
|
What are the material United States federal income tax
consequences of the merger to U.S. holders of BellSouth
common shares? |
| |
|
|
|
A18: |
|
The merger will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code. A U.S. holder of BellSouth common shares generally
will not recognize any gain or loss upon receipt of AT&T
common shares solely in exchange for BellSouth common shares in
the merger, except with respect to cash received in lieu of a
fractional AT&T common share. See “The
Merger — Material United States Federal Income Tax
Consequences” beginning on page 62. |
|
|
| |
|
Q19: |
|
When do you expect the merger to be completed? |
| |
|
A19: |
|
AT&T and BellSouth are working to complete the merger by the
end of 2006. However, the merger is subject to various
regulatory approvals and other conditions, and it is possible
that factors outside the control of both companies could result
in the merger being completed at a later time, or not at all.
There may be a substantial amount of time between the respective
AT&T and BellSouth special meetings and the completion of
the merger. AT&T and BellSouth hope to complete the merger
as soon as reasonably practicable. |
| |
|
Q20: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
| |
|
A20: |
|
Read and consider the information contained in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus carefully, and then please vote your shares
as soon as possible so that your shares may be represented at
your special meeting. |
| |
|
Q21: |
|
Should BellSouth or AT&T shareholders send in their share
certificates now for the exchange? |
| |
|
A21: |
|
No. BellSouth shareholders should keep any share
certificates they hold at this time. After the merger is
completed, BellSouth shareholders holding share certificates
will receive a letter of |
xi
|
|
|
|
|
|
transmittal and instructions on how to obtain AT&T common
shares, together with cash in lieu of fractional AT&T common
shares, to which they are entitled in exchange for their
BellSouth common shares. |
| |
|
|
|
AT&T shareholders will not be required to exchange their
certificates in connection with the merger, and shareholders
holding certificates should keep their share certificates both
now and after the merger is completed. |
| |
|
|
|
Q22: |
|
Who should I call if I have questions about the proxy
materials or voting procedures? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
A22: |
|
If you have questions about the merger, or if you need
assistance in submitting your proxy or voting your shares or
need additional copies of the joint proxy statement/prospectus
or the enclosed proxy card, you should contact the proxy
solicitation agent for the company in which you hold shares. If
you are an AT&T shareholder, you should contact
D.F. King & Co., Inc., the proxy solicitation
agent for AT&T, by mail at 48 Wall Street,
New York, New York 10005, or by telephone
at (800) 431-9643
(toll free)
or (212) 269-5550
(collect). If you are a BellSouth shareholder, you should
contact Morrow & Co., Inc., the proxy solicitation
agent for BellSouth, by mail at Attn: BellSouth
Administrator, 470 West Avenue — 3rd Floor,
Stamford, Connecticut 06902, or by telephone at
(877) 366-1576
(toll free). If your shares are held in a stock brokerage
account or by a bank or other nominee, you should call your
broker, bank or other nominee for additional information. |
|
|
xii
SUMMARY
|
|
|
This summary highlights selected information about the merger
in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and does not contain
all of the information that may be important to you. You should
carefully read this entire joint proxy statement/prospectus and
the other documents to which this joint proxy
statement/prospectus refers for a more complete understanding of
the matters being considered at the special meetings. See
“Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on
page 134. Unless we have stated otherwise, all references
in this joint proxy statement/prospectus to AT&T are to
AT&T Inc., all references to BellSouth are to BellSouth
Corporation, all references to Merger Sub are to ABC
Consolidation Corp., all references to Cingular are references
to Cingular Wireless LLC, Cingular Wireless Corporation, or
both, as the context requires, all references to ATTC are
references to AT&T Corp., a subsidiary of AT&T Inc., all
references to SBC are to SBC Communications Inc., which was the
former name of AT&T Inc., and all references to the merger
agreement are to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
March 4, 2006, by and among BellSouth, AT&T and Merger
Sub, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. |
|
The Companies (Page 24)
BellSouth. BellSouth Corporation was formed in December
1983 as one of several regional holding companies created to
hold ATTC’s local telephone companies. In 2005, BellSouth
had annual revenues of over $20 billion, net income of
almost $3.3 billion and income from continuing operations
of over $2.9 billion. BellSouth’s core business is
wireline communications and its largest customer segment is the
retail consumer segment. BellSouth is the leading wireline
communications service provider in the southeastern United
States, serving substantial portions of the population within
Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi,
North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee. BellSouth owns a
40% interest in Cingular and shares control with AT&T, which
owns a 60% interest in Cingular.
Through BellSouth
AnswersSM,
residential and small business customers can bundle their local
and long distance service with dial up and high speed DSL
Internet access, satellite television and Cingular Wireless
service. For businesses, BellSouth provides secure, reliable
local and long distance voice and data networking solutions.
BellSouth also operates one of the largest directory and
advertising businesses in the United States.
BellSouth’s principal executive offices are located at 1155
Peachtree Street, N.E.,
Atlanta,
Georgia 30309-3610 (telephone
number
404-249-2000). BellSouth was incorporated in 1983 under
the laws of the State of Georgia and became a publicly traded
company in December 1983.
AT&T. AT&T, formerly known as SBC Communications
Inc., was formed in December 1983 as one of several regional
holding companies created to hold ATTC’s local telephone
companies. At formation, SBC primarily operated in five
southwestern states. SBC acquired Pacific Telesis Group in 1997,
Southern New England Telecommunications Corporation in 1998 and
Ameritech Corporation in 1999, thereby expanding SBC’s
operations as the incumbent local exchange carrier, which we
refer to as an ILEC, into a total of 13 states. On
November 18, 2005, SBC acquired ATTC to create the current
AT&T, one of the world’s largest telecommunications
providers. In connection with that acquisition, the name of the
company was changed from
“SBC Communications Inc.” to
“AT&T Inc.” AT&T also owns 60% of Cingular.
AT&T ranks among the largest providers of telecommunications
services in the United States and the world. In 2005, AT&T
had annual revenues of over $43 billion and net income of
over $4.7 billion. (These figures do not include revenue
and net income of ATTC for the period before
November 18,
2005.) Through its
subsidiaries and affiliates, AT&T
provides communications services and products in the U.S. and
internationally. AT&T offers services and products to
consumers in the U.S. and services and products to businesses
and other providers of telecommunications services worldwide.
The services and products that AT&T offers vary by market,
and include: local exchange services, wireless communications,
long-distance services, data/broadband and Internet services,
telecommunications equipment, managed networking, and wholesale
transport services and directory advertising and publishing.
AT&T is also backed by the research and development
capabilities of AT&T Labs.
1
AT&T Inc. is a holding company incorporated under the laws
of the State of Delaware in 1983. AT&T’s principal
executive offices are located at 175 E. Houston,
San Antonio,
Texas 78205-2233 (telephone
number
210-821-4105).
Merger Sub. ABC Consolidation Corp., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of AT&T, which we refer to as Merger Sub, is a
Georgia corporation formed on
March 2, 2006 for the purpose
of effecting the merger. Upon completion of the merger, Merger
Sub will be merged with and into BellSouth and the resulting
company will be called BellSouth Corporation.
Merger Sub has not conducted any activities other than those
incidental to its formation and the matters contemplated by the
merger agreement, including the preparation of applicable
regulatory filings in connection with the merger.
The Merger (Page 25)
The transaction will be implemented by means of a merger of
Merger Sub with and into BellSouth. Following completion of the
merger, BellSouth will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of AT&T.
Merger Consideration (Page 77)
In the merger, BellSouth’s issued and outstanding common
shares will be converted into the right to receive 1.325
AT&T common shares, which we refer to as the exchange ratio.
Holders of BellSouth common shares will not receive any
fractional AT&T common shares in the merger. Instead, the
total number of AT&T common shares that each BellSouth
shareholder will receive in the merger will be rounded down to
the nearest whole number and AT&T will pay cash for any
resulting fractional AT&T common share that a BellSouth
shareholder otherwise would be entitled to receive. The amount
of cash payable for a fractional AT&T common share will be
determined by multiplying the fraction by the average closing
price for an AT&T common share for the five trading days
ending on the trading day immediately prior to the completion of
the merger.
For example, if a BellSouth shareholder owned 100 BellSouth
common shares, and the average closing price for an AT&T
common share as reported on the NYSE composite transactions
reporting system for the five trading days ending on the trading
day immediately prior to the closing date of the merger was
$25.00, that BellSouth shareholder would receive 132 AT&T
common shares (which is the whole number resulting from
multiplying the 100 BellSouth common shares and the
exchange ratio of 1.325 rounded down to the nearest whole
number) plus $12.50 in cash (which is the dollar amount
resulting from multiplying the 0.5 fractional AT&T
common share (that resulted from multiplying the
100 BellSouth common shares and the exchange ratio of
1.325) and the assumed average closing price of $25.00) instead
of the 0.5 fractional AT&T common share that the BellSouth
shareholder would otherwise have been entitled to receive.
Former BellSouth shareholders are currently expected to own
approximately 38% of the outstanding AT&T common shares
after the merger, based on shares outstanding as of
May 31,
2006.
Recommendation of the AT&T Board of Directors
(Page 70)
After careful consideration, the AT&T board of directors
resolved that the merger agreement and the transactions it
contemplates are fair to and in the best interests of
AT&T’s shareholders and approved the merger agreement.
The AT&T board of directors recommends that holders of
AT&T common shares vote “FOR” the proposal
to authorize the issuance of AT&T common shares required to
be issued to BellSouth shareholders pursuant to the merger
agreement.
In approving the merger agreement and making its recommendation,
the AT&T board of directors consulted with AT&T’s
senior management and AT&T’s financial and legal
advisors and considered a number of strategic, financial and
other considerations referred to under “The
Merger — AT&T’s Reasons for the Merger”
beginning on page 27.
2
Recommendation of the BellSouth Board of Directors
(Page 73)
After careful consideration, the BellSouth board of directors
approved and adopted the merger agreement. The BellSouth board
of directors recommends that BellSouth shareholders vote
“FOR” the approval of the merger agreement.
In reaching its decision to approve and adopt the merger
agreement and to recommend that BellSouth shareholders vote to
approve the merger agreement, the BellSouth board of directors
consulted with BellSouth’s management and BellSouth’s
financial and legal advisors and considered a number of
strategic, financial and other considerations referred to under
“The Merger — BellSouth’s Reasons for the
Merger” beginning on page 29.
Opinions of AT&T’s Financial Advisors
(Page 36)
In connection with the proposed merger, AT&T engaged Lehman
Brothers Inc., which we refer to as
Lehman Brothers, and
Evercore Group Inc., which we refer to as Evercore, to act as
its financial advisors. On
March 4, 2006,
Lehman Brothers
rendered its opinion to the AT&T board of directors that, as
of such date and based upon and subject to the matters stated in
its opinion, from a financial point of view, the exchange ratio
in the merger was fair to AT&T. In connection with
Evercore’s engagement, the AT&T board of directors
requested that Evercore render an opinion with respect to the
fairness, from a financial point of view, to AT&T, of the
exchange ratio. At the meeting of the AT&T board of
directors on
March 4, 2006, Evercore rendered its oral
opinion, which was subsequently confirmed in writing dated
March 4, 2006, that, as of such date and based upon and
subject to the matters stated in its opinion, the exchange ratio
was fair, from a financial point of view, to AT&T.
The
full texts of Lehman Brothers’ and Evercore’s written
opinions, each dated March 4, 2006, are attached as
Annex B and Annex C, respectively, to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. You are urged to read each of the opinions
carefully and in its entirety for a description of the
assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and
limitations on the review undertaken.
The opinions of
Lehman Brothers and Evercore are not intended to
be and do not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder of
AT&T as to how that shareholder should vote or act with
respect to any matter relating to the proposed merger or any
other matter described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Opinions of BellSouth’s Financial Advisors
(Page 47)
In connection with the proposed merger, BellSouth’s
financial advisors,
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., which we
refer to as Citigroup, and
Goldman, Sachs & Co., which
we refer to as Goldman Sachs, each have delivered an opinion
with respect to the fairness of the exchange ratio to be
received by the holders of BellSouth common shares in the
merger. Citigroup rendered its opinion that, as of
March 4,
2006, the exchange ratio was fair, from a financial point of
view, to the holders of BellSouth common shares. Goldman Sachs
rendered its opinion that, as of
March 4, 2006, the
exchange ratio pursuant to the merger agreement was fair, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of BellSouth common
shares.
The full texts of the written opinions of Citigroup
and Goldman Sachs are attached as Annex D and Annex E,
respectively, to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. You are
urged to read each of the opinions carefully and in its entirety
for a description of the assumptions made, procedures followed,
matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken.
The Citigroup and Goldman Sachs opinions are not intended to be
and do not constitute recommendations to any shareholder as to
how that shareholder should vote or act with respect to the
proposed merger or any other matter described in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus.
Treatment of BellSouth Stock Options and Stock-Based Awards
(Page 77)
At the effective time of the merger, all outstanding BellSouth
employee stock options will vest and be converted into options
to acquire AT&T common shares. The number of shares subject
to each option and the exercise price of each option will be
adjusted to give effect to the exchange ratio. All BellSouth
stock-
3
based awards outstanding at the effective time of the merger
will be similarly converted into stock-based awards reflecting a
number of shares of AT&T common shares determined based on
the exchange ratio.
Interests of BellSouth Executive Officers and Directors in
the Merger (Page 58)
You should be aware that some of the directors and executive
officers of BellSouth have interests in the merger that are
different from, or are in addition to, the interests of
BellSouth shareholders generally. These interests relate to the
treatment of equity-based compensation awards held by directors
and executive officers of BellSouth in the merger, the
appointment of three directors of BellSouth as directors of
AT&T after the merger, AT&T’s commitment to offer
BellSouth’s executive officers (other than its chief
executive officer) positions with AT&T or its
subsidiaries
after the merger and the indemnification of BellSouth directors
and officers by AT&T. In addition, these interests relate to
severance benefits payable to BellSouth’s executive
officers whose employment is not continued prior to (in
contemplation of the merger) or within two years following
completion of the merger.
Pursuant to an agreement with
F. Duane Ackerman,
BellSouth’s chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
Mr. Ackerman will retire within 90 days following
completion of the merger. Mr. Ackerman will be entitled to
the payments he would have been entitled to receive if his
employment had terminated with good reason immediately following
the merger, including a cash severance payment estimated to be
approximately $9.2 million and certain other equity-related
payments (restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock
options and performance shares) valued at approximately
$36.9 million based on the average closing share price for
BellSouth over the 90-day period before
May 31, 2006. For
additional information on the payments and benefits that
Mr. Ackerman will be entitled to receive in connection with
his retirement, and the assumptions underlying the estimated
payments, see
“Interests of BellSouth’s Executive
Officers and Directors in the Merger” beginning on page 58.
Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences
(Page 62)
The merger will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code. A U.S. holder of BellSouth common shares generally
will not recognize any gain or loss upon receipt of AT&T
common shares solely in exchange for BellSouth common shares in
the merger, except with respect to cash received in lieu of a
fractional AT&T common share.
Holders of BellSouth common shares should read “The
Merger — Material United States Federal Income Tax
Consequences” beginning on page 62 for a more complete
discussion of the United States federal income tax consequences
of the merger. Holders of BellSouth common shares are urged to
consult with their tax advisors regarding the tax consequences
of the merger to them, including the effects of United States
federal, state and local, foreign and other tax laws.
Procedures for Exchange of BellSouth Common Shares for
AT&T Common Shares (Page 77)
After we complete the merger, an exchange agent will provide
transmittal materials to each holder of record of certificated
BellSouth common shares. These materials will describe the
procedure for surrendering BellSouth share certificates to the
exchange agent.
Holders of uncertificated BellSouth common shares (holders whose
shares are held in book entry) will automatically be issued
uncertificated (book entry) AT&T common shares as soon as
possible after the completion of the merger.
In addition, the exchange agent will mail to BellSouth
shareholders a check in the amount (after giving effect to any
required tax withholdings) of any cash payable in lieu of
fractional AT&T common shares.
Accounting Treatment (Page 64)
The merger will be accounted for as an acquisition by AT&T
of BellSouth under the purchase method of accounting according
to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. As the
sole owner of Cingular following the merger, AT&T will be
required to include Cingular’s operating results under
“Operating Revenues” and “Operating
Expenses” on AT&T’s consolidated financial
statements.
4
Regulatory Matters Related to the Merger (Page 65)
HSR Act and Antitrust. The merger is subject to the
requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, which we
refer to as the HSR Act, which prevents us from completing the
merger until we furnish required information and materials to
the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, which we
refer to as the DOJ, and the Federal Trade Commission, which we
refer to as the FTC, and the applicable waiting period is
terminated or expires. On
March 31, 2006, we filed the
requisite Pre-Merger Notification and Report Forms under the HSR
Act with the DOJ and the FTC. On
May 1, 2006, the DOJ
issued requests for additional information and documentary
material to AT&T and BellSouth. As a result, the waiting
period applicable to the merger has been extended until after
both parties have complied with this request and the DOJ has
completed its review.
FCC Approval. Under the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, which we refer to as the Communications Act, we are
required to obtain the approval of the FCC prior to the transfer
of control of BellSouth’s FCC licenses and other
authorizations that will result from the merger. On
March 31, 2006, we filed an application for FCC consent to
the transfer of control of licenses and authorizations held
directly by BellSouth and indirectly through its
subsidiaries,
as well as for transfer of control of Cingular Wireless LLC and
its
subsidiaries and affiliates. Applications for FCC consent
are subject to public comment and objections and oppositions of
third parties who may interpose objections. Comments on and
petitions to deny the application are due on
June 5, 2006,
and reply comments are due on
June 20, 2006. The FCC has
set for itself a goal of completing action on transfer of
control applications within 180 days of public notice of
the application, which target completion date would be on or
around
October 16, 2006 for the application filed by
AT&T and BellSouth. However, no law or regulation requires
the FCC to complete its action by that date, or any date, and
the FCC acknowledges that more complex applications may take
longer.
State Regulatory Approvals. We are required to make
filings to provide notice of the merger or obtain approval of
the merger in 32 states, and BellSouth has filed for
approval to withdraw its authorizations for telecommunications
services in four states and the District of Columbia. The
filings were made with the relevant public utilities commissions
on
March 31, 2006. The commissions may subject our filings
to public comments, objections by third parties, or other
proceedings. As of
June 1, 2006, requirements were complete
in several jurisdictions. The remaining jurisdictions were still
reviewing our filing.
Cable Television Franchises. BellSouth holds
19 cable television franchises for which the change in
control of the operative BellSouth subsidiary pursuant to the
merger is subject to local franchising authority approval as
directed by the Communications Act. The relevant federal laws
generally require action by the local franchising authority
within 120 days, but this deadline may be extended under
certain circumstances. Most of the filings were made on
March 31, 2006.
Foreign and Certain Other Regulatory Matters. As of
June 1, 2006, the merger was cleared by the governments of
Germany and Norway, and was still being reviewed by the
government of the United Kingdom.
The merger may be subject to certain regulatory requirements of
other municipal, state, federal and foreign governmental
agencies and authorities.
Completion of the Merger (Page 76)
We expect to complete the merger after we receive shareholder
approvals at the special meetings of AT&T and BellSouth
scheduled to be held on
July 21, 2006 and after we receive
all required regulatory approvals. We currently expect to
complete the merger by the end of 2006. However, it is possible
that factors outside our control could require us to complete
the merger at a later time or not to complete it at all. See
“The Merger — Regulatory Matters Related to the
Merger” beginning on page 65.
No Dissenters’ Rights (Page 66)
Under Georgia law, the holders of BellSouth common shares are
not entitled to dissenters’ rights with respect to the
merger. If dissenters’ rights were applicable, a
shareholder who did not vote its shares in
5
favor of the transaction and complied with various notice
requirements could demand that the merging company pay to the
shareholder in cash the
“fair value” of its shares. In
transactions in which shareholders of a merging company are
entitled to dissenters’ rights, a shareholder who does not
vote his or her shares in favor of the transaction and complies
with various notice requirements generally may demand that the
merging company pay the shareholders in cash the
“fair
value” of its shares. If
the Company and the shareholders
cannot agree, the fair value of the shares is determined by a
court in an appraisal proceeding. Under Georgia law, the holders
of BellSouth common shares are not entitled to dissenters’
rights with respect to the merger. Therefore, although holders
of BellSouth common shares may vote against the merger, they
will not have the right under Georgia law to demand from
BellSouth in an appraisal proceeding the
“fair value”
of their shares. However, a holder of BellSouth common shares
who does not wish to be an AT&T shareholder may elect to
sell his or her shares at any time in the public market at the
value set by the market.
The Merger Agreement (Page 76)
The merger agreement is described beginning on page 76. The
merger agreement also is attached as Annex A to this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. We urge you to read the merger
agreement in its entirety because it contains important
provisions governing the terms and conditions of the merger.
Alternative Acquisition Proposals (Page 84)
Under the merger agreement, BellSouth:
|
|
|
| |
• |
is not permitted to initiate, solicit or knowingly facilitate or
encourage any inquiries that could lead to, or the making of,
any acquisition proposal for BellSouth; and |
| |
| |
• |
is generally not permitted to engage in any discussions
regarding, or provide any non-public information to any person
who has made, or proposes to make, an acquisition proposal for
BellSouth. |
However, before the merger agreement is approved by
BellSouth’s shareholders, BellSouth may:
|
|
|
| |
• |
provide non-public information requested by a person who has
made an unsolicited bona fide written acquisition proposal for
BellSouth, if BellSouth receives from that person an executed
confidentiality agreement together with a standstill agreement
(which would customarily prohibit or restrict for a specified
period of time a prospective acquirer’s direct or indirect
acquisition of the securities or assets of an entity and
attempts to obtain control of an entity); or |
| |
| |
• |
engage in discussions with any person who has made an
unsolicited bona fide written acquisition proposal; |
only if, in each case, the BellSouth board of directors
determines in good faith, that doing so is necessary for the
directors to comply with their fiduciary duties under applicable
law and, if engaging in discussions, if the BellSouth board of
directors also determines in good faith that the acquisition
proposal either constitutes or is reasonably likely to result in
a superior proposal to the merger with AT&T.
Conditions to Closing (Page 91)
We are not required to complete the merger unless a number of
conditions are satisfied or waived. These conditions include:
|
|
|
| |
• |
approval of the merger agreement by BellSouth’s
shareholders; |
| |
| |
• |
approval by AT&T’s shareholders of the issuance of
AT&T common shares in the merger; |
| |
| |
• |
expiration of the waiting period under the HSR Act; |
| |
| |
• |
receipt of all approvals required from the FCC; |
| |
| |
• |
receipt of all approvals and authorizations required from state
PUCs; |
| |
| |
• |
receipt of all other approvals and authorizations which if not
obtained would reasonably be likely to result in a regulatory
material adverse effect or in an officer or director of AT&T
or BellSouth being subject to criminal liability; and |
6
|
|
|
| |
• |
absence of any law issued or promulgated by a U.S. or U.K.
governmental entity after the signing of the merger agreement
that prohibits the merger, and the absence of any law issued or
promulgated by any other governmental entity that prohibits the
merger and which is reasonably likely to result in a regulatory
material adverse effect or to subject any officer or director of
AT&T or BellSouth to criminal liability. |
Even though the merger agreement does not provide that any of
these conditions are not waivable, we do not believe we can
complete the merger unless the conditions described in the first
four bullets above are satisfied.
In addition, AT&T is not required to complete the merger
unless a number of other conditions are satisfied or waived.
These conditions, any or all of which can be waived by AT&T,
include:
|
|
|
| |
• |
material accuracy of the representations and warranties of
BellSouth; |
| |
| |
• |
material performance by BellSouth of its pre-closing obligations
under the merger agreement; |
| |
| |
• |
the governmental consents that have been obtained do not impose
any condition that would reasonably be expected to result in a
regulatory material adverse effect; |
| |
| |
• |
all FCC consents must have been obtained by a final order; |
| |
| |
• |
BellSouth has obtained the consent of each person whose consent
is required under any material contract in connection with the
merger, except as would not reasonably be expected to result in
a material adverse effect on BellSouth; and |
| |
| |
• |
AT&T must have received the written opinion of its tax
counsel, dated the closing date of the merger, to the effect
that the merger will be treated for federal income tax purposes
as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of
the Code. |
In addition, BellSouth is not required to complete the merger
unless a number of further conditions are satisfied or waived.
These conditions, any or all of which can be waived by
BellSouth, include:
|
|
|
| |
• |
material accuracy of the representations and warranties of
AT&T; |
| |
| |
• |
material performance by AT&T of its pre-closing obligations
under the merger agreement; and |
| |
| |
• |
BellSouth must have received the written opinion of its tax
counsel, dated the closing date of the merger, to the effect
that the merger will be treated for federal income tax purposes
as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of
the Code. |
BellSouth does not currently anticipate waiving any of its
closing conditions. However, if BellSouth were to waive its tax
opinion closing condition and if the tax consequences of the
merger will be materially different from those we describe in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus, BellSouth will resolicit
votes of its shareholders with respect to the merger and ask
them to take the waiver into consideration. BellSouth does not,
however, intend to resolicit votes of its shareholders in
connection with any waiver of any other of its conditions to
closing.
Termination of the Merger Agreement (Page 94)
We may terminate the merger agreement and decide not to proceed
with the merger at any time before completion if we both agree.
Either AT&T or BellSouth may terminate the merger agreement
and decide not to proceed with the merger at any time before we
complete the merger if:
|
|
|
| |
• |
we do not complete the merger by a March 6, 2007
termination date, unless closing conditions relating to
governmental consents have not been satisfied by the termination
date, in which case either company may extend the termination
date one or more times to a date not beyond September 6,
2007; |
| |
| |
• |
BellSouth’s shareholders do not approve the merger
agreement at the BellSouth special meeting; |
| |
| |
• |
AT&T’s shareholders do not approve the issuance of the
common shares required to be issued in the merger at the
AT&T special meeting; or |
7
|
|
|
| |
• |
any governmental order is issued that permanently prohibits the
completion of the merger, except for certain types of orders. |
BellSouth may terminate the merger agreement and decide not to
proceed with the merger before we complete the merger if:
|
|
|
| |
• |
before AT&T’s shareholders approve the issuance of
AT&T common shares required to be issued in the merger,
AT&T’s board of directors withdraws, or qualifies in a
manner reasonably likely to be understood to be adverse to
BellSouth, its recommendation to issue the shares; or |
| |
| |
• |
before BellSouth’s shareholders approve the merger
agreement, and after giving AT&T advance notice, the
BellSouth board of directors approves and authorizes BellSouth
to enter into a binding written agreement for a superior
proposal and BellSouth pays a $1.7 billion termination fee
to AT&T; or |
| |
| |
• |
AT&T breaches any representation, warranty, covenant or
agreement in a way that the related condition to closing would
not be satisfied and this breach is not curable by the
termination date. |
AT&T may terminate the merger agreement and decide not to
proceed with the merger before we complete the merger if:
|
|
|
| |
• |
before BellSouth’s shareholders approve the merger
agreement, BellSouth’s board of directors withdraws, or
qualifies in a manner reasonably likely to be understood to be
adverse to AT&T, its recommendation of the merger; |
| |
| |
• |
before BellSouth’s shareholders approve the merger
agreement, the BellSouth board of directors approves or
recommends to the shareholders of BellSouth, any acquisition
proposal other than a merger with AT&T; |
| |
| |
• |
BellSouth breaches any of its representations, warranties,
covenants or agreements in a way that the related condition to
closing would not be satisfied and this breach is not curable by
the termination date; or |
| |
| |
• |
BellSouth willfully or intentionally breaches in any material
respect its obligations under the merger agreement relating to
acquisition proposals and the BellSouth board of directors’
recommendation of the merger. |
Effect of Termination; Termination Fees (Page 95)
In general, if the merger agreement is terminated, neither
BellSouth nor AT&T will have any liability to the other
under the merger agreement except for damages resulting from
willful or intentional breach of the merger agreement and any
obligation to pay a termination fee or the fees and expenses of
the other party.
BellSouth will be required to pay a $1.7 billion
termination fee to AT&T if the merger agreement is
terminated:
|
|
|
| |
• |
by BellSouth in order to enter into a proposal superior to the
AT&T merger; or |
| |
| |
• |
by AT&T because BellSouth willfully or intentionally
breached in any material respect its obligations under the
merger agreement relating to acquisition proposals and the
BellSouth board of directors’ recommendation of the merger. |
BellSouth will also be required to pay a $1.7 billion
termination fee to AT&T if, within 12 months of
termination, BellSouth completes, executes or publicly announces
an agreement in which any person other than AT&T or its
affiliates agrees to acquire at least 50% of the outstanding
Bellsouth common shares or 50% of the fair market value of
BellSouth’s consolidated assets, if a third party makes an
acquisition proposal for 50% of the outstanding BellSouth common
shares or 50% of BellSouth’s assets before the merger
agreement is terminated and the merger agreement is later
terminated:
|
|
|
| |
• |
by either AT&T or BellSouth because BellSouth’s
shareholders did not approve the merger agreement at the
BellSouth special meeting; |
8
|
|
|
| |
• |
by AT&T because BellSouth’s board of directors
withdrew, or qualified in a manner reasonably likely to be
understood to be adverse to AT&T, its recommendation of the
merger before the BellSouth special meeting; or |
| |
| |
• |
by AT&T because BellSouth breached any of its
representations, warranties, covenants or agreements in a way
that the related condition to closing would not be satisfied and
this breach is not curable by the termination date. |
BellSouth will be required to reimburse AT&T for fees and
expenses incurred by AT&T (including 60% of costs incurred
by Cingular) in connection with the merger, up to a maximum of
$120 million, if the merger agreement is terminated:
|
|
|
| |
• |
by BellSouth or AT&T, because BellSouth’s shareholders
did not approve the merger agreement at the BellSouth special
meeting; or |
| |
| |
• |
by AT&T, because BellSouth’s board of directors
withdrew, or qualified in a manner reasonably likely to be
understood to be adverse to AT&T, its recommendation of the
merger before the BellSouth special meeting. |
If BellSouth must also pay a termination fee, then the earlier
reimbursement of fees and expenses will be applied to reduce the
amount of the termination fee owed.
AT&T will be required to pay BellSouth a $1.7 billion
termination fee if AT&T completes, executes or publicly
announces an agreement in which any person other than BellSouth
or its affiliates agrees to acquire at least 50% of the
outstanding AT&T common shares or 50% of the fair market
value of AT&T’s consolidated assets within
12 months of termination, if a third party makes an
acquisition proposal for 50% of the outstanding AT&T common
shares or 50% of AT&T’s assets before the merger
agreement is terminated and the merger agreement is later
terminated:
|
|
|
| |
• |
by either AT&T or BellSouth because AT&T’s
shareholders did not approve the issuance of AT&T common
shares required to be issued in the merger at the AT&T
special meeting; or |
| |
| |
• |
by BellSouth because AT&T’s board of directors
withdrew, or qualified in a manner reasonably likely to be
understood to be adverse to BellSouth, its recommendation before
the AT&T special meeting. |
AT&T will also be required to reimburse BellSouth for fees
and expenses incurred by BellSouth (including 40% of costs
incurred by Cingular) in connection with the merger, up to a
maximum of $120 million, upon termination:
|
|
|
| |
• |
by AT&T or BellSouth, because AT&T’s shareholders
did not approve the issuance of AT&T common shares required
to be issued in the merger at the AT&T special
meeting; or |
| |
| |
• |
by BellSouth, because AT&T’s board of directors
withdrew, or qualified in a manner reasonably likely to be
understood to be adverse to BellSouth, its recommendation before
the AT&T special meeting. |
If AT&T must also pay a termination fee, then the earlier
reimbursement of fees and expenses will reduce the amount of the
termination fee owed.
Recommendation (Page 86)
Under the merger agreement, neither AT&T’s nor
BellSouth’s board of directors may withdraw its
recommendation in favor of the issuance of shares or approval of
the merger agreement, respectively, or qualify that
recommendation in a manner that is reasonably likely to be
understood as adverse to the other party, unless the party
withdrawing or qualifying its recommendation:
|
|
|
| |
• |
receives a superior proposal; and |
| |
| |
• |
first gives the other party three business days’ advance
notice of its intention to withdraw its recommendation and works
with the other party to determined whether the superior proposal
will remain superior. |
9
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF AT&T INC.
The following statements of operations data for each of the
three years in the period ended
December 31, 2005 and the
balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2005 and
2004 have
been derived from AT&T’s audited consolidated financial
statements contained in its Annual Report on
Form
10-K for the
fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005, which are incorporated
into this document by reference. The statements of operations
data for the years ended
December 31, 2002 and
2001 and the
balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2003,
2002 and
2001
have been derived from AT&T’s audited consolidated
financial statements for such years, which have not been
incorporated into this document by reference. The historical
financial information of AT&T does not include the results
of ATTC for any date or period prior to the
November 18,
2005 acquisition of ATTC.
The statements of operations data for each of the
three-month periods
ended
March 31, 2006 and
2005 and the balance sheet data as
of
March 31, 2006 have been derived from AT&T’s
unaudited consolidated financial statements, which are
incorporated into this document by reference.
You should read this selected historical financial data together
with the financial statements that are
incorporated by reference
into this document and their accompanying notes and
management’s discussion and analysis of operations and
financial condition of AT&T contained in such reports.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
March 31, | |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
($ in millions, except per share data) | |
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$ |
15,835 |
|
|
$ |
10,248 |
|
|
$ |
43,862 |
|
|
$ |
40,787 |
|
|
$ |
40,498 |
|
|
$ |
42,821 |
|
|
$ |
45,381 |
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
2,191 |
|
|
|
1,556 |
|
|
|
6,168 |
|
|
|
5,901 |
|
|
|
6,284 |
|
|
|
8,438 |
|
|
|
10,296 |
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
1,445 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
4,786 |
|
|
|
4,979 |
|
|
|
5,859 |
|
|
|
7,361 |
|
|
|
6,881 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1,445 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
4,786 |
|
|
|
5,887 |
|
|
|
8,505 |
|
|
|
5,653 |
|
|
|
7,008 |
|
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
$ |
2.56 |
|
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
|
$ |
2.08 |
|
|
Earnings per common share — assuming dilution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
|
$ |
2.20 |
|
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
$ |
2.56 |
|
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
|
$ |
2.07 |
|
|
Total assets(1)
|
|
$ |
144,437 |
|
|
$ |
108,212 |
|
|
$ |
145,632 |
|
|
$ |
110,265 |
|
|
$ |
102,016 |
|
|
$ |
95,170 |
|
|
$ |
96,416 |
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
25,829 |
|
|
|
20,937 |
|
|
|
26,115 |
|
|
|
21,231 |
|
|
|
16,097 |
|
|
|
18,578 |
|
|
|
17,153 |
|
|
Dividends declared per common share(2)
|
|
$ |
0.3325 |
|
|
$ |
0.3225 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
|
$ |
1.025 |
|
|
Book value per common share
|
|
$ |
14.17 |
|
|
$ |
12.22 |
|
|
$ |
14.11 |
|
|
$ |
12.27 |
|
|
$ |
11.57 |
|
|
$ |
10.01 |
|
|
$ |
9.82 |
|
|
Debt ratio(3)
|
|
|
36.4 |
% |
|
|
40.2 |
% |
|
|
35.9 |
% |
|
|
40.0 |
% |
|
|
32.0 |
% |
|
|
39.9 |
% |
|
|
44.3 |
% |
|
Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees
|
|
|
186,560 |
|
|
|
160,880 |
|
|
|
189,950 |
|
|
|
162,700 |
|
|
|
168,950 |
|
|
|
175,980 |
|
|
|
193,420 |
|
|
|
| (1) |
Certain amounts have been reclassified to record accounts
receivable in AT&T’s directory segment on a gross basis. |
| |
| (2) |
Dividends declared by AT&T’s board of directors reflect
that, in 2003, the board declared three additional dividends
totaling $0.25 per share above AT&T’s regular
quarterly dividend payout. |
| |
| (3) |
Debt ratio reflects debt as a percentage of total capital
calculated as follows: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
March 31, | |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
($ in millions) | |
|
Total debt
|
|
$ |
31,541 |
|
|
$ |
27,112 |
|
|
$ |
30,570 |
|
|
$ |
26,965 |
|
|
$ |
17,976 |
|
|
$ |
22,083 |
|
|
$ |
26,186 |
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
55,089 |
|
|
|
40,404 |
|
|
|
54,690 |
|
|
|
40,504 |
|
|
|
38,248 |
|
|
|
33,199 |
|
|
|
32,919 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (debt plus equity)
|
|
|
86,630 |
|
|
|
67,516 |
|
|
|
85,260 |
|
|
|
67,469 |
|
|
|
56,224 |
|
|
|
55,282 |
|
|
|
59,105 |
|
|
Debt as a percentage of total capital
|
|
|
36.4 |
% |
|
|
40.2 |
% |
|
|
35.9 |
% |
|
|
40.0 |
% |
|
|
32.0 |
% |
|
|
39.9 |
% |
|
|
44.3 |
% |
10
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF BELLSOUTH
The following statements of operations data for each of the
three years in the period ended
December 31, 2005 and the
balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2005 and
2004 have
been derived from BellSouth’s audited consolidated
financial statements contained in its Annual Report on
Form
10-K for the
fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005, which are incorporated
into this document by reference. The results of operations data
for the years ended
December 31, 2002 and
2001 and the
balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2003,
2002 and
2001
have been derived from BellSouth’s audited consolidated
financial statements for such years, which have not been
incorporated into this document by reference.
The statements of operations data for each of the
three-month periods
ended
March 31, 2006 and
2005 and the balance sheet data as
of
March 31, 2006 have been derived from BellSouth’s
unaudited consolidated financial statements, which are
incorporated into this document by reference.
You should read this selected historical financial data together
with the financial statements of BellSouth that are incorporated
by reference into this document and their accompanying notes and
management’s discussion and analysis of operations and
financial condition of BellSouth contained in such reports.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
March 31, | |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
($ in millions, except per share data) | |
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$ |
5,171 |
|
|
$ |
5,091 |
|
|
$ |
20,547 |
|
|
$ |
20,300 |
|
|
$ |
20,341 |
|
|
$ |
20,207 |
|
|
$ |
21,211 |
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
1,352 |
|
|
|
4,670 |
|
|
|
5,289 |
|
|
|
5,557 |
|
|
|
4,454 |
|
|
|
5,872 |
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
2,913 |
|
|
|
3,394 |
|
|
|
3,488 |
|
|
|
3,475 |
|
|
|
2,786 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
3,294 |
|
|
|
4,758 |
|
|
|
3,904 |
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
2,447 |
|
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
1.86 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
1.81 |
|
|
$ |
2.60 |
|
|
$ |
2.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
|
Earnings per common share — assuming dilution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
|
$ |
1.88 |
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
$ |
2.59 |
|
|
$ |
2.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
57,650 |
|
|
$ |
57,445 |
|
|
$ |
56,553 |
|
|
$ |
59,339 |
|
|
$ |
49,622 |
|
|
$ |
49,368 |
|
|
$ |
51,912 |
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
13,062 |
|
|
|
14,669 |
|
|
|
13,079 |
|
|
|
15,108 |
|
|
|
11,489 |
|
|
|
12,283 |
|
|
|
15,014 |
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
Book value per common share
|
|
$ |
13.33 |
|
|
$ |
12.93 |
|
|
$ |
13.09 |
|
|
$ |
12.60 |
|
|
$ |
10.77 |
|
|
$ |
9.63 |
|
|
$ |
9.99 |
|
|
Debt ratio(1)
|
|
|
42.0 |
% |
|
|
44.3 |
% |
|
|
42.2 |
% |
|
|
47.2 |
% |
|
|
43.2 |
% |
|
|
49.3 |
% |
|
|
51.8 |
% |
|
Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
63,066 |
|
|
|
62,564 |
|
|
|
75,743 |
|
|
|
77,020 |
|
|
|
87,875 |
|
|
|
| (1) |
Debt ratio reflects debt as a percentage of total capital
calculated as follows: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
March 31, | |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
($ in millions) | |
|
Total debt
|
|
$ |
17,470 |
|
|
$ |
18,818 |
|
|
$ |
17,188 |
|
|
$ |
20,583 |
|
|
$ |
14,980 |
|
|
$ |
17,397 |
|
|
$ |
20,125 |
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
24,085 |
|
|
|
23,676 |
|
|
|
23,534 |
|
|
|
23,066 |
|
|
|
19,712 |
|
|
|
17,906 |
|
|
|
18,758 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (debt plus equity)
|
|
|
41,555 |
|
|
|
42,494 |
|
|
|
40,722 |
|
|
|
43,649 |
|
|
|
34,692 |
|
|
|
35,303 |
|
|
|
38,883 |
|
|
Debt as a percentage of total capital
|
|
|
42.0 |
% |
|
|
44.3 |
% |
|
|
42.2 |
% |
|
|
47.2 |
% |
|
|
43.2 |
% |
|
|
49.3 |
% |
|
|
51.8 |
% |
11
SELECTED UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial data of AT&T, BellSouth and
Cingular as of and for the quarter ended
March 31, 2006.
The pro forma amounts in the table below are based upon the
historical financial statements of AT&T, BellSouth and
Cingular adjusted to give effect to the merger. It has been
assumed for purposes of the pro forma financial data provided
below that the merger was completed on
January 1, 2005 for
income statement purposes, and on
March 31, 2006 for
balance sheet purposes. These pro forma amounts have been
derived from (a) the unaudited consolidated financial
statements of AT&T contained in its Quarterly Report on
Form
10-Q for the
quarter ended
March 31, 2006, which are incorporated by
reference into this document, (b) the unaudited
consolidated financial statements of BellSouth contained in its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2006, which are
incorporated by reference into
this document, and (c) the unaudited consolidated financial
statements of Cingular contained in its Quarterly Report on
Form
10-Q for the
quarter year ended
March 31, 2006, which are incorporated
by reference into this document.
The pro forma financial data in the table below is provided for
illustrative purposes only and does not purport to represent
what the actual consolidated results of operations or the
consolidated financial position of AT&T would have been had
the merger occurred on the date assumed, nor is it necessarily
indicative of future consolidated results of operations or
financial position.
The pro forma financial data in the table below does not include
the realization of cost savings from operating efficiencies,
revenue synergies or restructuring costs resulting from the
merger. You should read this information in conjunction with the
separate historical consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes of AT&T, BellSouth and Cingular that are
incorporated by reference into this document and the Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information as of and for
the Quarter Ended
March 31, 2006 beginning on page 98.
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
As of and for the | |
| |
|
quarter ended | |
| |
|
March 31, 2006 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
($ in millions, | |
| |
|
except per share | |
| |
|
data) | |
| |
|
Pro Forma Combined | |
| |
|
| |
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$ |
28,909 |
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
3,333 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1,652 |
|
|
Net income per basic share
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
Net income per diluted share
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
0.3325 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
273,251 |
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
51,384 |
|
|
Debt ratio
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
120,505 |
|
12
SELECTED UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial data of AT&T, ATTC, BellSouth
and Cingular as of and for the year ended
December 31,
2005. The pro forma amounts in the table below are based upon
the historical financial statements of AT&T, ATTC, BellSouth
and Cingular, adjusted to give effect to the mergers. It has
been assumed for purposes of the pro forma financial data
provided below that the merger of AT&T and BellSouth and the
merger of AT&T and ATTC each was completed on
January 1, 2005 for income statement purposes, and that the
merger of AT&T and BellSouth was completed on
December 31, 2005 for balance sheet purposes. These pro
forma amounts have been derived from (a) the audited
consolidated financial statements of AT&T contained in its
Annual Report on
Form
10-K for the
fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005, which are incorporated
by reference into this document, (b) the audited
consolidated financial statements of BellSouth contained in its
Annual Report on
Form
10-K for the
year ended
December 31, 2005, which are incorporated by
reference into this document, (c) the audited consolidated
financial statements of Cingular contained in the Annual Reports
on Form 10-K of AT&T and BellSouth which are
incorporated by reference into this document, and (d) the
unaudited books and records of ATTC prior to AT&T’s
November 18, 2005 acquisition of ATTC, adjusted to
reclassify certain ATTC amounts to conform to AT&T
presentation.
The pro forma financial data in the table below is provided for
illustrative purposes only and does not purport to represent
what the actual consolidated results of operations or the
consolidated financial position of AT&T would have been had
the mergers occurred on the date assumed, nor is it necessarily
indicative of future consolidated results of operations or
financial position.
The pro forma financial data in the table below does not include
the realization of cost savings from operating efficiencies,
revenue synergies or restructuring costs resulting from the
merger. You should read this information in conjunction with the
separate historical consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes of AT&T, BellSouth and Cingular that are
incorporated by reference into this document and the Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Income as of and for
the Year Ended
December 31, 2005 beginning on page 109.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
As of and for the | |
| |
|
year ended | |
| |
|
December 31, 2005 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Pro Forma Combined | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
($ in millions, except | |
| |
|
per share data) | |
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$ |
117,437 |
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
11,326 |
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
6,547 |
|
|
Income from continuing operations per basic share
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
Income from continuing operations per diluted share
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
275,125 |
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
52,345 |
|
|
Debt ratio(1)
|
|
|
34.3% |
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
119,781 |
|
|
Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Number of employees
|
|
|
317,000 |
|
|
|
| (1) |
Debt ratio reflects debt as a percentage of total capital
calculated as follows: |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
As of the | |
| |
|
year ended | |
| |
|
December 31, 2005 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
($ in millions) | |
|
Total Debt
|
|
$ |
62,434 |
|
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
119,781 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (debt plus equity)
|
|
|
182,215 |
|
|
Debt as percentage of total capital
|
|
|
34.3% |
|
13
UNAUDITED COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA
The following table summarizes unaudited per share information
for AT&T and BellSouth on a historical basis, a pro forma
combined basis for AT&T and an equivalent pro forma combined
basis for BellSouth. It has been assumed for purposes of the pro
forma financial information provided below that the merger was
completed on
January 1, 2005 for income statement purposes,
and on
March 31, 2006 for balance sheet purposes. The following
information should be read in conjunction with the unaudited
consolidated financial statements of AT&T and BellSouth at
and for the
three-month
period ended
March 31, 2006, which are incorporated by
reference into this document, and the Unaudited Pro Forma
Condensed Combined Financial Information as of and for the
Quarter Ended
March 31, 2006 beginning on page 98. The
pro forma information below is presented for illustrative
purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the operating
results or financial position that would have occurred if the
merger had been completed as of the beginning of the period
presented, nor is it necessarily indicative of the future
operating results or financial position of the combined company.
The historical book value per share is computed by dividing
total stockholders’ equity by the number of common shares
outstanding at the end of the period. The pro forma per share
income from continuing operations of the combined company is
computed by dividing the pro forma loss from continuing
operations available to holders of the combined company’s
common shares by the pro forma weighted average number of shares
outstanding over the period. The pro forma combined book value
per share is computed by dividing total pro forma
stockholders’ equity by the pro forma number of common
shares outstanding at the end of the period. BellSouth
equivalent pro forma combined per share amounts are calculated
by multiplying the pro forma combined per share amounts by
1.325, the number of shares of AT&T common shares that will
be exchanged for each BellSouth common share in the merger.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Quarter Ended |
| |
|
March 31, 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
AT&T — Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic net income per share
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
| |
Diluted net income per share
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
| |
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
0.3325 |
|
| |
Book value per share
|
|
|
14.17 |
|
|
BellSouth — Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic net income per share
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
| |
Diluted net income per share
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
| |
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
| |
Book value per share
|
|
|
13.33 |
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited pro forma share of AT&T common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic net income per share
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
| |
Diluted net income per share
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
| |
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
0.3325 |
|
| |
Book value per share
|
|
|
19.18 |
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma BellSouth Equivalents(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited pro forma per AT&T common share:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic net income per share
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
| |
Diluted net income per share
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
| |
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
0.4406 |
|
| |
Book value per share
|
|
|
25.41 |
|
|
|
| (1) |
BellSouth equivalent per share amounts are calculated by
multiplying pro forma per share amounts by the exchange ratio of
1.325. |
14
UNAUDITED COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA
The following table summarizes unaudited per share information
for AT&T and BellSouth on a historical basis, a pro forma
combined basis for AT&T, giving effect to the pro forma
effects of the merger with BellSouth, and an equivalent pro
forma combined basis for BellSouth. It has been assumed for
purposes of the pro forma financial information provided below
that the mergers were completed on
January 1, 2005 for
income statement purposes, and on
December 31, 2005 for
balance sheet purposes. The income per share from continuing
operations of AT&T does not reflect any income items of ATTC
prior to the
November 18, 2005 acquisition of ATTC by
AT&T. The following information should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements
of AT&T and BellSouth as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2005, which are
incorporated by reference into
this document, and the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Statement of Income for the Year Ended
December 31, 2005
beginning on page 109. The pro forma information below is
presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily
indicative of the operating results or financial position that
would have occurred if the mergers had been completed as of the
beginning of the period presented, nor is it necessarily
indicative of the future operating results or financial position
of the combined company. The historical book value per share is
computed by dividing total stockholders’ equity by the
number of common shares outstanding at the end of the period.
The pro forma per share income from continuing operations of the
combined company is computed by dividing the pro forma income
from continuing operations available to holders of the combined
company’s common shares by the pro forma weighted average
number of shares outstanding over the period. The pro forma
combined book value per share is computed by dividing total pro
forma stockholders’ equity by the pro forma number of
common shares outstanding at the end of the period. BellSouth
equivalent pro forma combined per share amounts are calculated
by multiplying the pro forma combined per share amounts by
1.325, the number of shares of AT&T common shares that will
be exchanged for each BellSouth common share in the merger.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended |
| |
|
December 31, 2005 |
| |
|
|
|
AT&T — Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic income per share from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
| |
Diluted income per share from continuing operations
|
|
|
1.42 |
|
| |
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
| |
Book value per share
|
|
|
14.11 |
|
|
BellSouth — Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic income per share from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
| |
Diluted income per share from continuing operations
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
| |
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
1.14 |
|
| |
Book value per share
|
|
|
13.09 |
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited pro forma share of AT&T common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic income per share from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
| |
Diluted income per share from continuing operations
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
| |
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
| |
Book value per share
|
|
|
19.14 |
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma BellSouth Equivalents(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited pro forma per AT&T common share:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic income per share from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
| |
Diluted income per share from continuing operations
|
|
|
1.38 |
|
| |
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
1.72 |
|
| |
Book value per share
|
|
|
25.36 |
|
|
|
| (1) |
BellSouth equivalent per share amounts are calculated by
multiplying pro forma per share amounts by the exchange ratio of
1.325. |
15
COMPARATIVE MARKET DATA
AT&T common shares are listed on the NYSE under the symbol
“T”. BellSouth common shares are listed on the NYSE
under the symbol
“BLS”. The following table presents
trading information for AT&T and BellSouth common shares on
March 3, 2006, the last trading day before the public
announcement of the execution of the merger agreement, and
June 1, 2006, the latest practicable trading day before the
date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. You should read
the information presented below in conjunction with
“Comparative Per Share Market Price Data and Dividend
Information”, below.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
T Common Shares | |
|
BLS Common Shares | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Close | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Close | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
$ |
28.20 |
|
|
$ |
27.85 |
|
|
$ |
27.99 |
|
|
$ |
31.81 |
|
|
$ |
31.21 |
|
|
$ |
31.46 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
26.95 |
|
|
$ |
26.24 |
|
|
$ |
26.91 |
|
|
$ |
34.99 |
|
|
$ |
33.96 |
|
|
$ |
34.83 |
|
For illustrative purposes, the following table provides
BellSouth equivalent per share information on each of the
specified dates. BellSouth equivalent per share amounts are
calculated by multiplying AT&T per share amounts by the
exchange ratio of 1.325.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
T Common Shares | |
|
BLS Common Shares | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Close | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Close | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
$ |
28.20 |
|
|
$ |
27.85 |
|
|
$ |
27.99 |
|
|
$ |
42.15 |
|
|
$ |
41.35 |
|
|
$ |
41.68 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
26.95 |
|
|
$ |
26.24 |
|
|
$ |
26.91 |
|
|
$ |
35.71 |
|
|
$ |
34.77 |
|
|
$ |
35.66 |
|
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE MARKET PRICE DATA AND DIVIDEND
INFORMATION
The table below sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated,
the high and low sale prices per share reported on the NYSE
composite transactions reporting system and the dividends
declared on AT&T common shares and on BellSouth common
shares.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
AT&T | |
|
|
|
BellSouth Common | |
|
|
| |
|
Common Shares | |
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Dividends | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Dividends | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
27.73 |
|
|
$ |
23.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.3125 |
|
|
$ |
31.00 |
|
|
$ |
26.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
25.68 |
|
|
|
23.50 |
|
|
|
0.3125 |
|
|
|
27.94 |
|
|
|
24.46 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
26.88 |
|
|
|
22.98 |
|
|
|
0.3125 |
|
|
|
27.94 |
|
|
|
25.08 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
27.29 |
|
|
|
24.55 |
|
|
|
0.3225 |
|
|
|
28.96 |
|
|
|
25.65 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
25.98 |
|
|
$ |
22.99 |
|
|
$ |
0.3225 |
|
|
$ |
28.12 |
|
|
$ |
24.85 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
24.33 |
|
|
|
22.78 |
|
|
|
0.3225 |
|
|
|
27.36 |
|
|
|
25.38 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
24.97 |
|
|
|
23.20 |
|
|
|
0.3225 |
|
|
|
27.90 |
|
|
|
25.51 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
25.60 |
|
|
|
21.75 |
|
|
|
0.3325 |
|
|
|
28.03 |
|
|
|
24.32 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
28.82 |
|
|
$ |
24.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.3325 |
|
|
$ |
35.25 |
|
|
$ |
26.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
27.25 |
|
|
$ |
24.72 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
35.03 |
|
|
$ |
31.65 |
|
|
|
— |
|
On
June 1, 2006 the latest practicable trading day prior to
the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the last sale
price per share of AT&T common shares was $26.91 and the
last sale price per share of BellSouth common shares was $34.83,
in each case on the NYSE composite transactions reporting system.
We urge you to obtain current market quotations for AT&T and
BellSouth common shares before making any decision regarding the
merger or the authorization to issue AT&T common shares.
16
RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information included or incorporated
by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus,
including the matters addressed under the caption
“Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking
Statements” beginning on page 137, you should
carefully consider the matters described below in deciding
whether, in the case of AT&T shareholders, to vote to
approve the proposal to authorize the issuance of AT&T
common shares required to be issued pursuant to the merger
agreement or, in the case of BellSouth shareholders, to approve
the merger agreement.
Risk Factors Relating to the Merger
Because the market price of AT&T common shares will
fluctuate, BellSouth shareholders cannot be sure of the market
value of the AT&T common shares that they will receive in
the merger.
When we complete the merger, BellSouth common shares will be
converted into the right to receive 1.325 AT&T common
shares. The exchange ratio is fixed and will not be adjusted for
changes in the market price of either AT&T common shares or
BellSouth common shares. The merger agreement does not provide
for any price-based termination right. Accordingly, the market
value of the AT&T common shares that BellSouth shareholders
will be entitled to receive when we complete the merger will
depend on the market value of AT&T common shares at the time
that we complete the merger and could vary significantly from
the market value on the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus or the date of the BellSouth special
meeting. The market value of the AT&T common shares will
likely continue to fluctuate after the completion of the merger.
For example, during the fourth calendar quarter of 2005 and the
first calendar quarter of 2006, the market price of AT&T
common shares ranged from a low of $21.75 to a high of $28.82,
all as reported on the NYSE composite transactions reporting
system. See “Comparative Per Share Market Price Data and
Dividend Information” on page 16.
These variations could result from changes in the business,
operations or prospects of BellSouth or AT&T or Cingular
prior to or following the merger, regulatory considerations,
general market and economic conditions and other factors both
within and beyond the control of AT&T or BellSouth. We will
likely complete the merger a considerable period after the date
of the BellSouth special meeting. As such, at the time of the
special meetings, BellSouth shareholders will not know with
certainty the value of the AT&T common shares that they will
receive upon completion of the merger.
Our ability to complete the merger is subject to the
receipt of consents and approvals from government entities,
which may impose conditions that could have an adverse effect on
AT&T or could cause us to abandon the merger.
We are unable to complete the merger until after the applicable
waiting period under the HSR Act expires or terminates and we
receive approvals from various local, state, federal and foreign
governmental entities, including the FCC. In deciding whether to
grant some of these approvals, the relevant governmental entity
will consider the effect of the merger on competition in various
jurisdictions. The terms and conditions of the approvals that
are granted may require us to divest certain assets or
operations of AT&T or BellSouth or may impose other
conditions.
The merger agreement requires us to accept significant
conditions from these regulators before either of us may refuse
to close the merger on the basis of those regulatory conditions.
We can provide no assurance that we will obtain the necessary
approvals or that any required divestitures or other conditions
will not have a material adverse effect on AT&T following
the merger. In addition, we can provide no assurance that these
conditions will not result in the abandonment of the merger. See
“The Merger — Regulatory Matters Related to the
Merger” beginning on page 65 and “The Merger
Agreement — Conditions to the Merger” beginning
on page 91.
Any delay in completing the merger may reduce or eliminate
the benefits expected.
In addition to the required regulatory approvals, the merger is
subject to a number of other conditions beyond our control that
may prevent, delay or otherwise materially adversely affect its
completion. We
17
cannot predict whether and when these other conditions will be
satisfied. Further, the requirements for obtaining the required
clearances and approvals could delay the completion of the
merger for a significant period of time or prevent it from
occurring. Any delay in completing the merger could cause us not
to realize some or all of the synergies that we expect to
achieve if the merger is successfully completed within its
expected timeframe. See “The Merger Agreement —
Conditions to the Merger” beginning on page 91.
Because directors and executive officers of BellSouth have
interests in seeing the merger completed that are different than
those of BellSouth’s other shareholders, directors of
BellSouth have potential conflicts of interest in recommending
that BellSouth shareholders vote to approve the merger
agreement.
Directors of BellSouth have arrangements or other interests that
provide them with interests in the merger that are different
than those of BellSouth’s other shareholders. For example,
the merger agreement provides that three directors of BellSouth
will become directors of AT&T after the merger. While other
BellSouth directors will not become directors of AT&T after
the merger, in either case, AT&T will indemnify and maintain
liability insurance for each of the BellSouth directors’
services as directors of BellSouth before the merger. In
addition, the executive officers of BellSouth have change in
control and severance arrangements and other interests that are
different than the interests of BellSouth shareholders. For
example, if all of BellSouth’s eight executive officers
were terminated other than for cause or for good reason prior to
(in contemplation of the merger) or within two years following
completion of the merger, they would be entitled to cash
severance payments estimated to be approximately
$32 million in the aggregate. These and other material
interests of the directors and executive officers of BellSouth
in the merger that are different than those of the other
BellSouth shareholders are described under “The
Merger — Interests of BellSouth Executive Officers and
Directors in the Merger” beginning on page 58.
The merger agreement contains provisions that could
discourage a potential competing acquiror that might be willing
to pay more for the BellSouth shares than is being paid by
AT&T in the merger or could result in any competing proposal
being at a lower price than it might otherwise be.
The merger agreement contains “no shop” provisions
that, subject to limited exceptions, restrict BellSouth’s
ability to solicit, facilitate, discuss or commit to competing
third-party proposals to acquire all or a significant part of
BellSouth. Further, there are only limited exceptions to
BellSouth’s agreement that the BellSouth board of directors
will not withdraw or qualify in a manner that could reasonably
be understood as adverse to AT&T or its recommendation of
the merger agreement, and AT&T generally has a right to
match any competing acquisition proposals that may be made.
Although the BellSouth board of directors is permitted to
terminate the merger agreement in response to a superior
proposal if it determines that doing so is necessary to comply
with its fiduciary duties, BellSouth would, under these
circumstances, be required to pay a $1.7 billion
termination fee to AT&T. In addition, if a third party
publicly makes a proposal for a competing transaction with
BellSouth before the special meeting and BellSouth’s
shareholders do not approve the merger, BellSouth will be
required to pay AT&T a $1.7 billion termination fee if
within 12 months thereafter, BellSouth completes or enters
into an agreement for an alternative acquisition transaction.
Furthermore, if the BellSouth shareholders do not approve the
merger for any reason, whether or not a third party has publicly
made a proposal for a competing transaction with BellSouth,
BellSouth would be required to reimburse up to $120 million
of AT&T’s expenses in connection with the merger (this
reimbursement would be applied to reduce the amount of any
termination fee, if paid). Moreover, although BellSouth’s
board of directors is permitted to withdraw its recommendation
of the merger in response to a superior proposal, if it believes
that doing so is necessary to comply with its fiduciary duties,
its doing so would entitle AT&T to terminate the merger
agreement and to collect reimbursement of expenses from
BellSouth of up to $120 million (which would be applied to
reduce the termination fee, if paid). In addition, the
termination fee of $1.7 billion could become payable if
BellSouth completes, or enters into an agreement with respect
to, an alternative acquisition transaction during the
12 months following the termination. We describe these
provisions under “The Merger Agreement —
Covenants and Agreements — Acquisition Proposals”
beginning on page 84, “— Termination of the
Merger Agreement” beginning on page 94 and
“— Termination Fees and Expenses” beginning
on page 95.
18
These provisions could discourage a potential competing acquiror
that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant
part of BellSouth from considering or proposing that
acquisition, even if it were prepared to pay consideration with
a higher per share cash or market value than that proposed to be
paid in the merger, or might result in a potential competing
acquiror proposing to pay a lower per share price to acquire
BellSouth than it might otherwise have proposed to pay because
of the added expense of the termination fee that may become
payable to AT&T in certain circumstances.
If the merger is terminated and BellSouth determines to seek
another business combination, BellSouth may not be able to
negotiate a transaction with another company on terms comparable
to, or better than, the terms of the merger.
Risk Factors Relating to AT&T Following the Merger
AT&T may fail to realize the anticipated cost savings,
revenue enhancements and other benefits expected from the
merger, which could adversely affect the value of AT&T
common shares after the merger.
The merger involves the integration of AT&T and BellSouth,
two companies that have previously operated independently, and
Cingular, their joint venture. AT&T and BellSouth entered
into the merger agreement with the expectation that, among other
things, the merger would combine the two companies’ local
exchange businesses, provide the combined company with access to
BellSouth’s fiber network and put control of Cingular in
one company, all of which is expected to create opportunities to
achieve cost savings and revenue synergies, to share
technological developments and to achieve other synergistic
benefits.
Delays we encounter in the transition process could have a
material adverse effect on the revenues, expenses, operating
results and financial condition of the combined company.
Although AT&T and BellSouth expect significant benefits,
such as increased cost savings, to result from the merger, there
can be no assurance that the combined company will actually
realize these anticipated benefits.
The value of AT&T common shares following completion of the
merger may be affected by the ability of the combined company to
achieve the benefits expected to result from completion of the
merger. Achieving the benefits of the merger will depend in part
upon meeting the challenges inherent in the successful
combination of three business enterprises of the size and scope
of AT&T, BellSouth and Cingular and the possible resulting
diversion of management attention for an extended period of
time. There can be no assurance that we will meet these
challenges and that such diversion will not negatively impact
the operations of the combined company following the merger.
This risk may be heightened due to the fact that AT&T just
recently completed the merger of SBC and ATTC, and management
attention has been focused and continues to be focused on
combining those two business enterprises. See “The
Merger — AT&T’s Reasons for the Merger”
beginning on page 27.
AT&T has incurred substantial expenses related to the
integration of ATTC and expects to incur additional substantial
expenses related to the continued integration of ATTC, the
continued integration of AT&T Wireless and Cingular and the
integration of BellSouth as a result of the merger.
AT&T has incurred, and continues to incur, substantial
expenses in connection with the integration of the businesses,
policies, procedures, operations, technologies and systems of
ATTC. At the same time, Cingular has incurred substantial
expenses in connection with the integration of AT&T Wireless
Services, Inc., which we refer to as AT&T Wireless, which
Cingular acquired in October 2004. AT&T expects to incur
substantial expenses in connection with the integration of the
businesses, policies, procedures, operations, technologies,
systems and personnel of BellSouth with those of AT&T. These
include certain integration expenses related to AT&T’s
assumption of 100% ownership of Cingular in connection with the
merger.
There are a large number of systems that must be integrated,
including management information, purchasing, accounting and
finance, sales, billing, payroll and benefits, fixed asset and
lease administration systems and regulatory compliance. While
AT&T has assumed that a certain level of expenses would be
incurred, there are a number of factors beyond its control that
could affect the total amount or the timing
19
of all of the expected integration expenses including, among
others, constraints arising under U.S. federal or state
antitrust laws (such as limitations on sharing of information)
that may prevent or hinder AT&T from fully developing
integration plans and constraints arising as a result of the
regulatory approval process. Moreover, many of the expenses that
will be incurred, by their nature, are impracticable to estimate
at the present time. These expenses could, particularly in the
near term, exceed the savings that AT&T expects to achieve
from the elimination of duplicative expenses and the realization
of economies of scale and cost savings and revenue synergies
related to the integration of the businesses following the
completion of the merger. These integration expenses likely will
result in AT&T taking significant charges against earnings,
both cash and non-cash, primarily from the amortization of
intangibles following the completion of the merger. The amount
and timing of any such charges are uncertain at present.
The combined company’s indebtedness following the
completion of the merger will be higher than AT&T’s
existing indebtedness. This increased level of indebtedness
could adversely affect AT&T in many ways, including by
reducing funds available for other business purposes.
The indebtedness of AT&T as of
April 30, 2006 was
approximately $31,315,000,000. AT&T’s pro forma
indebtedness as of
April 30, 2006, after giving effect to
the merger and taking into account Cingular’s indebtedness
to parties other than AT&T and BellSouth, was approximately
$62,000,000,000. As a result of the increase in debt, demands on
AT&T’s cash resources may increase after the merger.
AT&T also expects to repurchase approximately
$10 billion of its shares by the end of 2007, the funding
of which will increase demands on AT&T’s cash resources
and potentially increase its debt levels. The increased levels
of indebtedness could reduce funds available to AT&T for
investment in research and development and capital expenditures
or create competitive disadvantages for AT&T compared to
other companies with lower debt levels.
Uncertainties associated with the merger may cause a loss
of employees and may otherwise materially adversely affect the
future business and operations of AT&T, BellSouth and
Cingular.
AT&T’s success after the merger will depend in part
upon the ability of AT&T to retain key employees of
AT&T, BellSouth and Cingular. Competition for qualified
personnel can be intense. Current and prospective employees of
AT&T, BellSouth and Cingular may experience uncertainty
about their post-merger roles with AT&T following the
merger. This may materially adversely affect the ability of each
of AT&T, BellSouth and Cingular to attract and retain key
management, sales, marketing, technical and other personnel. In
addition, key employees may depart because of issues relating to
the uncertainty and difficulty of integration or a desire not to
remain with AT&T following the merger. Accordingly, no
assurance can be given that AT&T will be able to attract or
retain key employees of AT&T, BellSouth and Cingular to the
same extent that those companies have been able to attract or
retain their own employees in the past.
Technological innovation is important to AT&T’s success
and depends, to a significant degree, on the work of technically
skilled employees. Competition for the services of these types
of employees is vigorous. AT&T cannot provide assurance that
it will be able to attract and retain these employees following
the merger with BellSouth. If, following the merger, AT&T
were unable to attract and maintain technically skilled
employees, the competitive position of AT&T could be
materially adversely affected.
Similarly, in connection with the pendency of the merger, some
of our and Cingular’s customers and strategic partners may
delay or defer decisions to use our or Cingular’s services.
This could negatively impact our and Cingular’s revenues,
earnings and cash flows, as well as the market prices of
AT&T common shares and BellSouth common shares, regardless
of whether we are able to complete the merger.
AT&T will continue to face significant competition,
which may reduce its market share and lower its profits.
Rapid development in telecommunications technologies, such as
wireless, cable and Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), has
significantly increased competition in the telecommunications
industry. As a
20
result, AT&T will compete not only with other traditional
telephone companies including long distance carriers, but also
with new competitors such as wireless companies, cable companies
and VoIP providers. These competitors are typically subject to
less or no regulation and therefore are able to offer services
at lower cost. In addition, these competitors also have lower
cost structures compared to AT&T, due in part to the absence
of a unionized workforce at the competitors, their offering of
lower benefits to employees and their having fewer retirees (as
most of the competitors are relatively new companies). The
increased competition will put further pressure on the price of
the services provided by AT&T following the merger and may
result in reduced revenues and loss of profits.
AT&T’s future growth will depend upon its ability
to implement its business strategy.
AT&T’s business strategy following the merger will
continue to be focused on providing integrated, high-quality and
competitively priced communications solutions and services.
AT&T cannot provide assurance that the implementation of
these initiatives will not be delayed, or that they will ever be
successfully implemented, whether due to factors within
AT&T’s control, such as failure to execute these
initiatives, or factors outside of AT&T’s control, such
as a change in general economic or regulatory conditions. Even
if these initiatives are implemented, AT&T cannot assure you
that they will allow AT&T to increase its revenues from its
existing service offerings or from emerging communications
services.
AT&T’s ability to maintain leading technological
capabilities is uncertain and its failure to do so could lead to
a material adverse effect on its future competitive position and
financial performance.
AT&T’s operating results will depend to a significant
extent upon its ability to continue to expand its business to
include other communications services and to reduce costs of its
existing services. AT&T cannot assure you that it will
successfully develop and market new service opportunities in a
timely or cost-effective manner. The success of new service
development depends on many factors, including proper
identification of customer needs, cost, timely completion and
introduction, differentiation from offerings of competitors and
market acceptance.
Technology in the telecommunications industry changes rapidly as
new technologies are developed, which could cause
AT&T’s products and services to become obsolete.
AT&T cannot assure you that it and its suppliers will be
able to keep pace with technological developments. If the new
technologies on which AT&T intends to focus its research and
development investments fail to achieve acceptance in the
marketplace, AT&T could suffer a material adverse effect on
its future competitive position that could cause a reduction in
its revenues and earnings. For example, competitors of AT&T
could be the first to obtain proprietary technologies that are
perceived by the marketplace as being superior. Further, after
substantial research and development costs, one or more of the
technologies under development by AT&T or any of its
strategic partners could become obsolete prior to its
introduction. In addition, delays in the delivery of components
or other unforeseen problems in AT&T’s
telecommunication systems may occur that could materially
adversely affect its ability to generate revenue, offer new
services and remain competitive.
The success of AT&T’s Project Lightspeed
broadband initiative will depend on the timing, extent and cost
of deployment, the development of attractive and profitable
service offerings and the extent to which regulatory, franchise
fees and build-out requirements apply to this initiative.
The trend in telecommunications technology is to shift from the
traditional circuit and wire-based technology to Internet
Protocol-based technology, which we refer to as IP.
IP-based technology can
transport voice and data, as well as video, from both wired and
wireless networks.
IP-based networks also
potentially cost less to operate than traditional networks.
AT&T’s competitors, many of which are newer companies,
are deploying this
IP-based technology. In
order to continue to offer attractive and competitively-priced
services, AT&T is deploying a new broadband network to offer
IP-based voice, data
and video services. AT&T has been building out its network
in numerous locations and began providing services, including IP
video, in one limited market in late 2005. AT&T’s goal
in this controlled market entry is to fully apply its new
operating and back-office systems, gain information on customer
preferences
21
and, if needed, to fine-tune the service. To that end, AT&T
has restricted the number of customers and services offered to
the necessary minimum. Subject to successful results from this
controlled market entry and successful testing of its additional
IP video services, AT&T plans to enter 15 to 20 additional
markets by the end of 2006. During that expansion, AT&T
expects to add additional features to its IP video service
offering. AT&T expects to spend approximately $4.6 billion
on its Project Lightspeed initiative to reach nearly
19 million households by year-end 2008 as part of its
initial deployment. Using a new and sophisticated technology on
a very large scale entails risks but also presents opportunities
to expand service offerings to customers. Should deployment of
this network be delayed or costs exceed expected amounts,
AT&T’s margins would be adversely affected and these
effects could be material. Should regulatory requirements be
different than AT&T anticipated, deployment could be
delayed, perhaps significantly, or limited to only those
geographical areas where regulation is not burdensome. In
addition, should the delivery of services expected to be
deployed on our network be delayed due to technological or
regulatory constraints or other reasons, or the cost of
providing these services becomes higher than expected, customers
may decide to purchase services from competitors which would
adversely affect AT&T’s revenues and margins, and these
effects could be material.
Changes to federal and state regulations and decisions in
regulatory proceedings could materially adversely affect
AT&T’s future competitive position and financial
performance.
The wireline and ATTC
subsidiaries of AT&T are subject to
significant federal and state regulation, while many of the
competitors of AT&T are not. The adoption of new regulations
or changes to existing regulations could significantly increase
costs, which either would reduce AT&T’s operating
margins or potentially could increase customer turnover should
AT&T attempt to increase prices to cover its increased
costs. In addition, the development of new technologies, such as
IP-based services, has
created or potentially could create conflicting regulation
between the FCC and various state and local authorities, which
may involve lengthy litigation to resolve and may result in
outcomes unfavorable to us.
Resales of AT&T common shares following the merger and
additional obligations to issue AT&T common shares may cause
the market price of AT&T common shares to fall.
As of
May 31, 2006, AT&T had approximately
3,883,378,517 common shares outstanding and approximately
376,311,739 common shares subject to outstanding options
and other rights to purchase or acquire its shares. AT&T
currently expects that it will issue approximately 2,400,000,000
AT&T common shares in connection with the merger. The
issuance of these new AT&T common shares and the sale of
additional AT&T common shares that may become eligible for
sale in the public market from time to time upon exercise of
options (including a substantial number of AT&T options that
will replace existing BellSouth options) could have the effect
of depressing the market price for AT&T common shares.
In addition, many BellSouth shareholders are already
shareholders of AT&T. Those shareholders may decide not to
hold the additional AT&T shares they will receive in the
merger. The sale of those AT&T shares could also have the
effect of depressing the market price for the AT&T common
shares.
The trading price of AT&T common shares may be
affected by factors different from those affecting the price of
BellSouth common shares.
When we complete the merger, holders of BellSouth common shares
will become holders of AT&T common shares. The results of
operations of AT&T, as well as the trading price of AT&T
common shares, after the merger may be affected by factors
different from those currently affecting BellSouth’s
results of operations and the trading price of BellSouth common
shares. For a discussion of the businesses of AT&T and
BellSouth and of certain factors to consider in connection with
those businesses, see the
documents incorporated by reference in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus and referred to under
“Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on
page 136.
22
Cingular faces substantial competition in all aspects of
its business as competition continues to increase in the
wireless communications industry.
Under current FCC rules, six or more PCS licensees, two cellular
licensees and one or more enhanced specialized mobile radio
licensees may operate in each of Cingular’s service areas.
On average, Cingular has three to four other wireless
competitors in each of its service areas and competes for
customers based principally on price, service offerings, call
quality, coverage area and customer service.
Cingular’s competitors are principally three national and a
larger number of regional providers of cellular, PCS and other
wireless communications services. Cingular also competes with
resellers and wireline service providers. Moreover, Cingular may
experience significant competition from companies that provide
similar services using other communications technologies and
services. While some of these technologies and services are now
operational, others are being developed or may be developed in
the future.
AT&T expects that intense industry competition and market
saturation likely will cause the wireless industry’s
customer growth rate to moderate in comparison with historical
growth rates. This competition will continue to put pressure on
pricing, margins and customer turnover as the carriers compete
for potential customers. The substantial competition Cingular is
facing could have a material adverse effect on its ability to
achieve revenue and profit growth, and this in turn could hurt
AT&T’s bottom line.
As a result of the merger, AT&T’s ownership of Cingular
will increase from 60% to 100% and the proportion of
AT&T’s business represented by Cingular will increase.
As a result, AT&T’s exposure to risks that Cingular
faces and to the risks associated with operating a wireless
telecommunications business will increase.
Uncertainty in the U.S. securities markets and
adverse medical cost trends could cause AT&T’s pension
and postretirement costs to increase further following the
merger.
AT&T’s pension and postretirement costs have increased
in recent years, primarily due to a continued increase in
medical and prescription drug costs. Investment returns of
AT&T’s pension funds depend largely on trends in the
U.S. securities markets and the U.S. economy in
general. In particular, uncertainty in the U.S. securities
markets and U.S. economy could result in investment returns
less than those previously assumed and a decline in the value of
plan assets used in pension and postretirement calculations,
which AT&T will be required to recognize over the next
several years under U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Should the securities markets decline and medical
and prescription drug costs continue to increase significantly,
AT&T would expect to face increasing annual combined net
pension and postretirement costs.
23
THE COMPANIES
BellSouth
BellSouth was formed in 1983 as a result of the breakup of the
Bell System. In 2005, BellSouth had annual revenues of over
$20 billion, net income of almost $3.3 billion and
income from continuing operations of over $2.9 billion.
BellSouth’s core business is wireline communications and
its largest customer segment is the retail consumer segment.
BellSouth is the leading wireline communications service
provider in the southeastern United States, serving substantial
portions of the population within Alabama, Florida, Georgia,
Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina
and Tennessee. BellSouth owns a 40% interest in Cingular and
shares control with AT&T, which owns a 60% interest in
Cingular. Through BellSouth
Answers
sm,
residential and small business customers can bundle their local
and long distance service with dial up and high speed DSL
Internet access, satellite television and Cingular Wireless
service. For businesses, BellSouth provides secure, reliable
local and long distance voice and data networking solutions.
BellSouth also operates one of the largest directory and
advertising businesses in the United States. BellSouth’s
principal executive offices are located at 1155 Peachtree
Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia
30309-3610 (telephone
number
404-249-2000).
BellSouth was incorporated in 1983 under the laws of the State
of Georgia and became a publicly traded company in December 1983.
AT&T
AT&T is a holding company incorporated under the laws of the
State of Delaware in 1983 as a result of the breakup of the Bell
System. AT&T’s principal executive offices are located
at 175 E. Houston,
San Antonio,
Texas 78205-2233
(telephone number
210-821-4105).
AT&T, formerly known as SBC Communications Inc., was formed
as one of several regional holding companies created to hold
ATTC’s local telephone companies. At formation, SBC
primarily operated in five southwestern states.
Subsidiaries of
SBC merged with Pacific Telesis Group in 1997, Southern New
England Telecommunications Corporation in 1998 and Ameritech
Corporation in 1999, thereby expanding SBC’s operations as
the incumbent local exchange carrier (
“ILEC”) into a
total of 13 states. On
November 18, 2005, one of
SBC’s
subsidiaries merged with ATTC, creating AT&T, one
of the world’s largest telecommunications providers. In
connection with the merger, the name of
the company was changed
from
“SBC Communications Inc.” to
“AT&T
Inc.” AT&T also owns a 60% interest in Cingular.
AT&T ranks among the largest providers of telecommunications
services in the United States and the world. In 2005, AT&T
had annual revenues of over $43 billion and net income of
over $4.7 billion. Through AT&T’s
subsidiaries and
affiliates, it provides communications services and products in
the U.S. and internationally. AT&T offers services and
products to consumers in the U.S. and services and products to
businesses and other providers of telecommunications services
worldwide. The services and products that AT&T offers vary
by market, and include: local exchange services, wireless
communications, long-distance services, data/broadband and
Internet services, telecommunications equipment, managed
networking, and wholesale transport services and directory
advertising and publishing. AT&T is also backed by the
research and development capabilities of AT&T Labs.
Merger Sub
ABC Consolidation Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of AT&T
is a Georgia corporation formed on
March 2, 2006 for the
purpose of effecting the merger. Upon completion of the merger,
Merger Sub will be merged with and into BellSouth and the
resulting company will be called BellSouth Corporation.
Merger Sub has not conducted any activities other than those
incidental to its formation and the matters contemplated by the
merger agreement, including the preparation of applicable
regulatory filings in connection with the merger.
24
THE MERGER
Background of the Merger
AT&T and BellSouth have each considered the possibility of
combining with the other from time to time since even before the
passage of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and from time to
time have had preliminary discussions regarding the possibility
of such a transaction.
In 2000, AT&T (then known as SBC) and BellSouth contributed
their respective mobile wireless voice and data businesses to
their Cingular joint venture. Cingular is 60% owned by AT&T
and 40% owned by BellSouth, but control of the joint venture is
shared equally. As co-owners of Cingular, AT&T and BellSouth
are party to various governance arrangements, including the
limited liability company agreement of Cingular Wireless LLC and
the shareholders agreement of Cingular Wireless Corporation, and
each was a party to the merger agreement between Cingular and
AT&T Wireless in February 2004. The existence of Cingular,
its increasing importance to each of AT&T and BellSouth, its
governance arrangements and Cingular’s acquisition of
AT&T Wireless in 2004 resulted in senior executives of
AT&T and BellSouth working together to maximize the business
strength and value of Cingular both on its own and as a
complement to the other businesses of AT&T and BellSouth.
AT&T and BellSouth also work together on their
YellowPages.com joint venture, established in October 2004.
Prior to 2006, representatives of AT&T and BellSouth had
last discussed the possibility of a business combination in late
2004 and early 2005, but were unable to agree on the transaction
and a basis to proceed with discussions, primarily because
mutually agreeable economic terms were unable to be agreed. In
January 2005, AT&T entered into an agreement to acquire ATTC
in a transaction that closed in November 2005. In the fall of
2005, BellSouth and its Board of Directors considered a wide
range of strategic alternatives for BellSouth, including
combinations with AT&T or another large telecommunications
company and sales or distributions of certain of its businesses,
including its interest in Cingular. BellSouth did not commence
negotiations in 2005 with respect to a potential combination
with AT&T because AT&T was in the midst of acquiring
ATTC. In its review of strategic alternatives, the BellSouth
Board reviewed the feasibility of a business combination with a
large telecommunications company other than AT&T or a sale
or spin-off of certain of BellSouth’s businesses, including
its interest in Cingular. BellSouth did not engage in
negotiations with any third party regarding, nor did it
otherwise pursue, any such transaction because each presented
significant tax, regulatory or control issues that would make
execution difficult and potentially adversely impact shareholder
value. As a result, BellSouth determined that remaining
independent presented a more favorable alternative at that time.
In early January 2006, AT&T requested one of its financial
advisors to meet with Mr. Ackerman to determine if
BellSouth was interested in reopening discussions concerning a
business combination between AT&T and BellSouth.
AT&T’s financial advisor and Mr. Ackerman met on
January 13. At this meeting, AT&T’s financial
advisor discussed a potential merger in which BellSouth
shareholders would receive a 15% premium over the market value
of their shares. Mr. Ackerman indicated that, although he
was open to discussing such a transaction with
Mr. Whitacre, the premium suggested by the AT&T advisor
would not be adequate. The next day, Mr. Whitacre and
Mr. Ackerman met in a previously scheduled meeting and
briefly discussed the possibility of combining the two
companies. Mr. Whitacre suggested a transaction in which
BellSouth shareholders would receive a premium in the range of
15 to 20% over the market value of their shares, and
Mr. Ackerman indicated that, for a transaction to be
acceptable to BellSouth, it must provide BellSouth shareholders
with a premium of at least 20%. Messrs. Whitacre and
Ackerman agreed to consult with their respective boards of
directors regarding the possibility of a merger.
On
January 23, 2006, Mr. Ackerman discussed with the
BellSouth board his brief discussions with Mr. Whitacre
about a possible transaction with AT&T. Based on this
discussion with the BellSouth Board, on
January 26, 2006,
Mr. Ackerman contacted Mr. Whitacre and indicated that
BellSouth was willing to further discuss a transaction.
Mr. Whitacre briefed the AT&T Board on these
discussions at AT&T’s
January 27, 2006 Board
meeting. The AT&T Board indicated that AT&T should
consider a possible transaction. On
February 7, 2006, the
BellSouth Board met telephonically and discussed the potential
25
transaction with AT&T. The BellSouth Board conveyed its
views on a proposed transaction with AT&T to
Mr. Ackerman and approved further discussions with AT&T.
Mr. Whitacre and Mr. Ackerman met on
February 10,
2006 to discuss a possible business combination. At that
meeting, Mr. Ackerman proposed to Mr. Whitacre a
possible transaction whereby AT&T and BellSouth would seek
to negotiate a business combination on the basis of an exchange
ratio of 1.325 AT&T common shares for each BellSouth common
share and with one or more BellSouth directors becoming members
of the AT&T Board. The 1.325 exchange ratio represented an
approximately 20% premium over averages extending back over an
approximate two year period. This represented an amount that
AT&T believed would be accretive to AT&T’s adjusted
earnings per share (earnings adjusted for amortization of
intangibles and merger related integration costs) within a
reasonable period of time and worth paying to obtain BellSouth,
including control of Cingular. Messrs. Whitacre and
Ackerman also agreed at this time that the headquarters of the
combined company would remain in San Antonio, Texas, that the
Southeast regional telephone company headquarters would be in
Atlanta, Georgia and that the headquarters of Cingular would
remain in Atlanta for at least a period of time. Furthermore,
they decided to commence detailed due diligence and
contract
negotiations promptly, with the goal of announcing a transaction
within a few weeks.
On
February 13, 2006, Mr. Whitacre contacted
Mr. Ackerman to confirm AT&T’s interest in
proceeding with a business combination on the basis of a 1.325
exchange ratio. Mr. Ackerman discussed these developments
with the BellSouth Board at a telephonic meeting on
February 14, 2006 and the BellSouth Board requested that
Mr. Ackerman continue discussions with AT&T. Later that
day, members of the senior managements of AT&T and BellSouth
met to discuss how to proceed with entering into a merger
agreement and the process for conducting due diligence.
BellSouth and AT&T entered into a mutual confidentiality
agreement on
February 16, 2006 and on that date commenced
due diligence reviews of each other’s businesses based upon
non-public information and began to negotiate the terms of the
merger agreement. Thereafter and until shortly before the merger
agreement was executed on
March 4, 2006, AT&T and
BellSouth and their respective representatives engaged in due
diligence of the other’s businesses, discussions regarding
their respective businesses, prospects and the synergies and
business benefits that could result from the merger as well as
the terms and conditions of the merger agreement. Significant
areas of negotiation included the scope and degree of
reciprocity of representations and warranties and interim
operating covenants, the conditions to closing, the terms upon
which BellSouth could consider an alternative acquisition
proposal and the process for dealing with any such proposal and
the amount and triggers for payment of termination fees. In that
connection, the parties discussed whether BellSouth would be
permitted to terminate the merger agreement to accept a proposal
for a superior transaction or would be required to submit the
merger agreement to a vote of its shareholders. The
$1.7 billion termination fee was agreed to after the
parties made a series of termination fee proposals ranging from
less than $1 billion to $2.5 billion. The parties also
discussed various benefit and employee related provisions of the
merger agreement, including the terms of a severance program and
retention bonuses for BellSouth employees and the potential
roles BellSouth management would be offered with AT&T and
its affiliates. During these discussions, AT&T also raised
the possibility of paying a portion of the merger consideration
in cash but BellSouth preferred a transaction in which its
shareholders would receive consideration comprised solely of
stock in order to afford BellSouth’s shareholders the
opportunity to share in the expected benefits of the combined
entity. At the time that the proposed merger was announced,
AT&T announced a new share repurchase authorization that
replaced its share repurchase program in effect before the
merger announcement. Under the new program, AT&T is
authorized to repurchase 400 million shares through 2008.
The new repurchase authorization is intended to approximate the
premium being paid to BellSouth shareholders by AT&T in the
merger.
The AT&T Board held a telephonic meeting on
February 20,
2006, and heard reports from management on the status of
discussions with BellSouth and discussed the proposed
transaction. The BellSouth Board met on February 26 and 27,
2006 and received reports from management on the status of the
discussions with AT&T, as well as presentations from
management on the preliminary results of its due diligence
investigation and from management and BellSouth’s financial
advisors on the financial effects
26
of the merger. The BellSouth Board also was advised by BellSouth
management and outside legal counsel, Fried, Frank, Harris,
Shriver & Jacobson LLP, regarding the regulatory
approvals that would be necessary to complete the merger and the
BellSouth Board’s fiduciary obligations in connection with
considering and approving the merger agreement. On
March 4,
2006, the Boards of Directors of AT&T and BellSouth met
separately and each received presentations regarding the results
of its management’s due diligence investigations, the terms
and conditions of the merger agreement, the approval process and
the financial and strategic implications of the merger. At the
BellSouth Board of Directors meeting, Goldman Sachs and
Citigroup rendered their respective opinions that, as of the
date of the meeting and based upon and subject to the factors,
assumptions, matters, procedures, limitations and qualifications
set forth in such opinions, the exchange ratio to be received by
the holders of BellSouth common shares in the merger was fair,
from a financial point of view, to such holders. At the AT&T
Board of Directors meeting,
Lehman Brothers and Evercore
rendered their respective opinions that, as of the date of the
meeting and based upon and subject to the matters stated in
these opinions, from a financial point of view, the exchange
ratio in the merger was fair to AT&T. Immediately after the
conclusion of the Board of Directors meetings, AT&T,
BellSouth and Merger Sub executed and delivered to each other
the merger agreement.
AT&T’s Reasons for the Merger
In reaching its conclusion to approve the merger and the merger
agreement and recommend that AT&T shareholders vote FOR
approval of the issuance of AT&T common shares required to
be issued pursuant to the merger agreement, the AT&T Board
of Directors considered a number of factors, including the
following:
100% Ownership of Cingular
|
|
|
| |
• |
Ownership of 100% of Cingular will permit AT&T to better
integrate Cingular wireless offerings with AT&T’s other
communication offerings. This is expected to create enhanced
marketing opportunities, significant network synergies resulting
from combining multiple IP networks into a single IP network,
the ability to more rapidly develop and make available advanced
products and services and reduced marketing costs (by rebranding
Cingular to the AT&T brand). |
| |
| |
• |
Ownership of 100% of Cingular also will improve the speed and
focus of decision making in the Cingular business, which should
help it develop and deliver more quickly to customers the new
products and services they desire. |
Network Integration
|
|
|
| |
• |
The ability to integrate the IP networks of AT&T, BellSouth
and Cingular into a single, fully integrated wireless and
wireline IP network will offer not only substantial cost savings
opportunities, but also should permit AT&T to offer more
quickly the kinds of tightly integrated voice, data and video
products it believes will be increasingly demanded by customers
in the near future. |
| |
| |
• |
The addition of the BellSouth wireline network, which already
includes a substantial build-out of fiber optic cable to points
near-end users, will complement AT&T’s existing plans
to deploy IPTV to existing wireline service areas and increase
the number of potential customers for AT&T’s IPTV
product. |
Financial Impacts
|
|
|
| |
• |
The merger is expected to have a positive impact on
AT&T’s adjusted earnings per share (meaning
AT&T’s earnings per share adjusted to exclude all
merger integration costs and non-cash expenses for amortization
of intangibles) beginning in 2008, taking into account the
effects of AT&T’s proposed share repurchase, although
because of expenses for amortization of intangibles and
integration costs, the merger is expected to be dilutive to
reported earnings per share for at least several years. |
27
|
|
|
| |
• |
The merger will increase AT&T’s investment in the
faster growing wireless business, a move that should help
facilitate enhanced future revenue growth. |
| |
|
|
| |
• |
The merger is expected to improve free cash flow (cash from
operations minus capital expenditures and dividends) beginning
in 2008, and is expected to have a modestly negative effect on
net debt to EBITDA coverage ratios, even after taking into
account the anticipated 2007 share repurchases. |
|
|
| |
| |
• |
The merger is expected to result in cost savings, revenue
enhancements and capital savings with a net present value of
approximately $18 billion. |
Other Factors Considered by the AT&T Board
|
|
|
| |
• |
The information concerning AT&T’s and BellSouth’s
respective historic businesses and financial results and
prospects, including the results of AT&T’s due
diligence investigation of BellSouth. |
| |
| |
• |
AT&T management’s assessment that it can, working with
BellSouth managers and employees, effectively and efficiently
integrate the BellSouth wireline and directories businesses with
the similar AT&T businesses. |
| |
| |
• |
The opinions of AT&T’s financial advisors, Lehman
Brothers and Evercore (each of which will receive a fee for
their services as financial advisors to AT&T in connection
with the merger, a substantial portion of which, in the case of
Evercore, is contingent upon completion of the merger and, in
the case of Lehman Brothers, is contingent alternatively upon
either consummation of the merger or payment by BellSouth of a
termination fee to AT&T), that, as of March 4, 2006 and
subject to the matters stated in their respective opinions, from
a financial point of view, the exchange ratio was fair to
AT&T. |
| |
| |
• |
The fact that the exchange ratio is fixed and will not fluctuate
based upon changes in AT&T’s stock price between
signing and closing. |
| |
| |
• |
The terms of the merger agreement that create a strong
commitment on the part of BellSouth to complete the merger. |
Potential Risks Considered by the AT&T Board
|
|
|
| |
• |
The risks of integrating the operations of two businesses the
size of the BellSouth wireline business and directories business
with the corresponding businesses at AT&T, including the
risks that integration costs may be greater, and synergy
benefits lower, than anticipated by AT&T management, which
risks are amplified by the ongoing integration of AT&T and
ATTC. |
| |
| |
• |
The risk that regulatory agencies may not approve the merger or
may impose terms and conditions on their approvals that
adversely affect the projected financial results of the combined
company. |
| |
| |
• |
The risk that an unanticipated technological development may
adversely affect the business benefits anticipated to result
from the merger. |
| |
| |
• |
The terms of the Merger Agreement that create a strong
commitment on AT&T to complete the merger. |
The AT&T Board of Directors recognized that there can be no
assurance about future results, including results expected or
considered in the factors listed above. The AT&T Board of
Directors concluded, however, that the potential advantages of
the merger outweighed its potential risks.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by the AT&T Board of Directors is not exhaustive,
but includes the material factors considered by it. The AT&T
Board of Directors did not quantify or assign relative weights
to the specific factors considered in reaching the determination
to recommend that AT&T shareholders vote FOR approval
of the issuance of the AT&T common shares required to be
issued pursuant to the merger agreement. In addition, individual
directors may have given different weights to different factors.
28
Recommendation of the AT&T Board of Directors
After careful consideration, the AT&T Board of Directors
unanimously resolved that the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, including the issuance of
AT&T common shares, are advisable and approved the merger
agreement. THE AT&T BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT
THE HOLDERS OF AT&T COMMON SHARES VOTE “FOR” THE
PROPOSAL TO ISSUE AT&T COMMON SHARES REQUIRED TO BE
ISSUED TO BELLSOUTH SHAREHOLDERS PURSUANT TO THE MERGER
AGREEMENT.
BellSouth’s Reasons for the Merger
The BellSouth Board, at its meeting on
March 4, 2006,
unanimously approved and adopted the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger. The
BellSouth Board unanimously recommends that the BellSouth
shareholders vote FOR the approval of the merger agreement.
In reaching its decision to approve and adopt the merger
agreement and to recommend that the BellSouth shareholders vote
for the approval of the merger agreement, the BellSouth Board
consulted with BellSouth’s management and its financial and
legal advisors and considered a variety of factors, including
the material factors described below.
Financial Considerations
The BellSouth Board considered the following financial factors:
|
|
|
| |
• |
the financial terms of the transaction, including: |
|
|
|
| |
— |
the fixed exchange ratio of 1.325 AT&T common shares for
each BellSouth common share; |
| |
| |
— |
that the exchange ratio reflected a 20% premium to the BellSouth
shareholders based on the historical trading relationship of the
securities of the two companies; |
| |
| |
— |
that based on the closing trading prices of BellSouth common
shares and AT&T common shares on the trading day prior to
the announcement of the merger, the exchange ratio represented
approximately $37.09 per BellSouth common share, a 17.9%
percent premium over the closing price of the BellSouth common
shares on the NYSE on that day; |
| |
| |
— |
the expectation that, based on the current annual dividend paid
by AT&T and the 1.325 exchange ratio, the annual dividend
BellSouth shareholders will receive after the transaction will
be 52% greater than the annual dividend currently paid to
holders of BellSouth common shares; |
| |
| |
— |
the BellSouth shareholders will hold approximately 38% of the
outstanding common shares of the combined company immediately
after closing and will have the opportunity to share in the
future growth and expected synergies of the combined company,
while retaining the flexibility of selling all or a portion of
those shares for cash into a very liquid market at any time; |
|
|
|
| |
• |
the financial analyses and opinions of each of Citigroup Global
Markets Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co., BellSouth’s
financial advisors that, as of March 4, 2006, and based
upon and subject to the factors, assumptions, matters,
procedures, qualifications and limitations set forth in the
opinions, the exchange ratio was fair, from a financial point of
view, to holders of BellSouth common shares (each opinion is
more fully described under “— Opinions of
BellSouth’s Financial Advisors”; the fees payable to
Citigroup and Goldman Sachs are contingent alternatively upon
either consummation of the merger or payment by AT&T of a
termination fee to BellSouth); |
29
|
|
|
| |
• |
based upon the advice of BellSouth management who had
discussions with AT&T management, the significant synergies
that could result from the transaction, including: |
|
|
|
| |
— |
synergies with a net present value of an estimated
$18 billion expected to result from the transaction,
including annual synergies of $2 billion expected beginning
in 2008, growing to $3 billion beginning in 2009; |
| |
| |
— |
the multiple sources of the synergies and that 90% of the
anticipated synergies are expected to be derived from clearly
identified expense and capital reductions; and |
|
|
|
| |
• |
the demonstrated ability of AT&T’s management to
successfully integrate and obtain synergistic benefits from
previous acquisitions. |
Business Considerations
The BellSouth Board considered the following business factors:
|
|
|
| |
• |
the BellSouth Board’s view of BellSouth’s prospects
and potential future financial performance as an independent
company; |
| |
| |
• |
the expectation that the combined company would be a more
effective and efficient provider of wireless, broadband, video,
data and directory services; |
| |
| |
• |
the simplification of the ownership structure of Cingular
Wireless; |
| |
| |
• |
the anticipated enhanced capabilities and competitiveness of the
combined company as compared to BellSouth on a stand-alone
basis, including: |
|
|
|
| |
— |
greater financial, technical, research and development, network
and marketing resources to better serve consumers and
large-business customers, and the acceleration of the
introduction of new and improved products and services for those
customers; |
| |
| |
— |
greater scale, scope and reach to leverage the significant
spending required to develop next generation products and
services for both business and consumer customers; |
| |
| |
— |
the expectation that the greater scale, scope and reach of the
post merger company would make it a more attractive partner for
companies with national or international business models; |
| |
| |
— |
the ability to better offer integrated wireless, wireline, and
broadband products and services over a single IP network, and to
strengthen capabilities in business markets through converged
services and a single point of contact for wireless and wireline
services; and |
| |
| |
— |
the ability to more economically deploy next-generation IP
television networks and similar services over BellSouth’s
extensive, fiber rich broadband network. |
Other Transaction Considerations
The BellSouth Board also considered the following factors:
|
|
|
| |
• |
the BellSouth Board’s judgment, after consultation with
BellSouth’s management and financial advisors, that an
alternative transaction that would provide a greater value to
the shareholders of BellSouth was unlikely to be available,
while leaving the BellSouth Board with the possibility to
consider an alternative transaction; |
| |
| |
• |
the merger agreement permits BellSouth under certain
circumstances, to provide non-public information to, and engage
in discussions with, any third-party that proposes an
alternative transaction and to terminate the merger agreement to
accept a superior proposal; |
| |
| |
• |
the BellSouth Board’s judgment that, although certain terms
of the merger agreement, including the $1.7 billion
termination fee, may make it more costly for a third party to
effect an alternative transaction with BellSouth, those terms
should not preclude a third party with the financial ability |
30
|
|
|
| |
|
to complete a transaction from proposing an alternative
transaction involving BellSouth in view of the fact that
$1.7 billion represents a relatively small percentage of
the aggregate consideration that would be payable in any
alternative transaction; |
| |
| |
• |
the BellSouth Board’s judgment, after consultation with
BellSouth’s financial advisors, that as a percentage of the
merger consideration at the time of the announcement of the
transaction, the $1.7 billion termination fee was at the
low end of the range of termination fees provided for in 26
recent large acquisition transactions and that, on average, the
termination fee payable in those transactions was approximately
3.0% of the aggregate value of the merger consideration; |
| |
| |
• |
the $1.7 billion termination fee was the result of
considerable negotiation between representatives of BellSouth
and AT&T; |
| |
| |
• |
the consideration by the BellSouth Board, after consultation
with counsel, of the likelihood that the merger would be
approved by the requisite authorities, without the imposition of
material conditions that would prevent or materially delay the
merger and of the required efforts of the parties to obtain such
approvals; |
| |
| |
• |
the expressed intention of AT&T to broadly utilize the
services of the management and employees of BellSouth following
the merger, and the proposed management arrangements of the
combined company under which each executive officer of BellSouth
(other than the Chief Executive Officer) will be given the
opportunity to become a senior officer of AT&T or a
subsidiary of AT&T with a position of significant managerial
experience for at least three years following the completion of
the merger; |
| |
| |
• |
three BellSouth directors will join the AT&T board of
directors following the completion of the merger; |
| |
| |
• |
the following employee benefit arrangements, which the BellSouth
Board believed would increase the likelihood of a successful
integration and operation of the combined company and are
designed to ensure the retention of BellSouth employees in the
unlikely event that the merger is not completed: |
|
|
|
| |
— |
the retention bonus arrangements for management to be
implemented in connection with the merger; |
| |
| |
— |
the broad-based severance plan for BellSouth’s management
employee base contemplated by the merger agreement; |
| |
| |
— |
that aggregate pre-closing levels of BellSouth compensation and
employee benefits will be maintained for at least twelve months
following completion of the merger, excluding equity
compensation; and |
| |
| |
— |
that AT&T agreed to maintain a number of specified benefit
plans through the second anniversary of the completion of the
merger; |
|
|
|
| |
• |
AT&T’s commitment to continue BellSouth’s historic
levels of charitable contributions and community activities,
including the continued funding of charitable activities
throughout BellSouth’s nine-state region as has previously
been provided through the BellSouth Foundation and to continue
to support economic development and education in
BellSouth’s nine-state region; |
| |
| |
• |
AT&T’s commitment to maintain the headquarters of
Cingular Wireless in Atlanta, Georgia for at least five years
following the merger and to keep the Southeast regional
telephone company headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia; and |
| |
| |
• |
the expectation that the merger would qualify as a
reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes and
that, as a result, the exchange by BellSouth shareholders of
their BellSouth common shares for AT&T common shares in the
merger generally would be tax-free to the BellSouth shareholders. |
31
Potential Risks
The BellSouth Board considered a variety of risks and other
potentially negative factors, including the following:
|
|
|
| |
• |
the price of AT&T common shares at the time of closing could
be lower than the price as of the time of signing and
accordingly, the value of the consideration received by
BellSouth shareholders in the merger could be materially less
than the value as of the date of the merger agreement; |
| |
| |
• |
the difficulties and challenges inherent in completing a merger
and integrating the businesses, especially in light of
AT&T’s 2005 acquisition of ATTC; |
| |
| |
• |
the expected synergies and other benefits of the merger might
not be fully achieved or may not be achieved within the
timeframes expected; |
| |
| |
• |
given the size of the combined company and the mix of assets it
will own, the challenges it will face in continuing to grow its
revenues; |
| |
| |
• |
the fact that the AT&T dividend is subject to change by the
board of directors of AT&T; |
| |
|
|
| |
• |
the risks of the type and nature described above under
“Risk Factors” beginning on page 17; |
|
|
| |
| |
• |
the merger ultimately may not be completed as a result of
material adverse conditions imposed by regulatory authorities or
otherwise; |
| |
| |
• |
certain provisions of the merger agreement may have the effect
of discouraging proposals for alternative transactions with
BellSouth, including: |
|
|
|
| |
— |
the restriction on BellSouth’s ability to solicit proposals
for alternative transactions; |
| |
| |
— |
the requirement that BellSouth provide AT&T the right to
obtain information with respect to proposals for alternative
transactions and to a three business day negotiating period
after receipt by BellSouth of a superior proposal before the
BellSouth Board may terminate the merger agreement and accept
the superior proposal, withdraw its recommendation of the merger
or recommend the superior proposal; and |
| |
| |
— |
the requirement that BellSouth pay a termination fee of
$1.7 billion to AT&T, in order for BellSouth to
terminate the merger agreement and accept a superior proposal; |
|
|
|
| |
• |
that BellSouth would also be required to pay a termination fee
of $1.7 billion to AT&T under the following
circumstances: |
|
|
|
| |
— |
the merger agreement is terminated because BellSouth willfully
or intentionally breaches in any material respect the provisions
of the merger agreement restricting BellSouth’s ability to
solicit proposals for an alternative transaction and the
BellSouth Board’s ability to withdraw or modify its
recommendation of the merger; or |
| |
| |
— |
the merger agreement is terminated because either
BellSouth’s shareholders fail to approve the merger, the
BellSouth Board withdraws its recommendation of the merger or
qualifies its recommendation in a manner (as permitted by the
merger agreement) that could be reasonably understood to be
adverse to AT&T, or BellSouth willfully and intentionally
breaches materially its representation or covenants under the
merger agreement after a third party proposes an alternative
transaction with BellSouth and within 12 months of
termination, a third party signs or completes an acquisition
transaction with BellSouth or BellSouth announces an alternative
transaction involving a spin-off or other distribution that is
completed. |
|
|
|
| |
• |
these additional triggers for the payment of a termination fee
were generally consistent with the termination fee triggers in
other public company merger transactions; |
| |
| |
• |
the failure on the part of the BellSouth shareholders to approve
the merger, by itself, would not trigger a payment of a
$1.7 billion termination fee by BellSouth, and the
obligation on the part of |
32
|
|
|
| |
|
BellSouth to reimburse AT&T’s expenses that would be
triggered in the event of such a failure is capped at
$120 million; |
| |
| |
• |
the prohibition in the merger agreement on the ability of the
BellSouth Board to withdraw its recommendation of the merger or
qualify its recommendation in a manner that could be reasonably
understood to be adverse to AT&T, other than in connection
with BellSouth’s receipt of a proposal to acquire BellSouth
that is more favorable to the BellSouth shareholders than the
merger; |
| |
| |
• |
the circumstances under which AT&T may terminate the merger
agreement, including AT&T’s right to terminate the
merger agreement if the BellSouth Board withdraws its
recommendation of the merger or qualifies its recommendation in
a manner that could be reasonably understood to be adverse to
AT&T; |
| |
| |
• |
the circumstances under which BellSouth may be obligated to
reimburse AT&T for AT&T’s expenses (up to
$120 million, in total), including in the event that
BellSouth shareholders fail to approve the merger agreement; |
| |
| |
• |
certain of BellSouth’s directors and officers may have
conflicts of interest in connection with the merger, as they
will receive certain benefits that are different from, and in
addition to, those of BellSouth’s other shareholders (see
“— Interests of BellSouth Executive Officers and
Directors in the Merger”); and |
| |
| |
• |
the risk and costs that the merger might not be completed, the
potential impact of the restrictions under the merger agreement
on BellSouth’s ability to take certain actions during the
pendency of the merger agreement, the potential for diversion of
management and employee attention and for employee attrition
during that period and the potential effect on BellSouth’s
business and relations with customers and service providers. |
The BellSouth Board considered all of the foregoing factors as a
whole and concluded that it supported a favorable determination
to approve and adopt the merger agreement and recommend the
merger agreement to the BellSouth shareholders.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
discussed by the BellSouth Board is not exhaustive but does
include the material factors considered by the BellSouth Board.
The BellSouth Board did not quantify or assign any relative or
specific weight to the various factors that it considered.
Rather, the BellSouth Board based its recommendation on the
totality of the information presented to and considered by it.
In addition, individual members of the BellSouth Board may have
given no weight or different weight to different factors.
Recommendation of the BellSouth Board of Directors
After careful consideration, the BellSouth board of directors
approved and adopted the merger agreement and the merger. THE
BELLSOUTH BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT THE HOLDERS OF
BELLSOUTH COMMON SHARES VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE
MERGER AGREEMENT.
Certain Financial Projections
Although BellSouth and AT&T periodically may issue limited
guidance to investors concerning their respective expected
financial performance, BellSouth and AT&T do not as a matter
of course publicly disclose detailed financial projections.
However, in connection with their respective confirmatory due
diligence, AT&T requested, and BellSouth’s management
provided AT&T and its financial advisors with, non-public,
financial projections prepared by BellSouth management in
November 2005 for internal BellSouth planning purposes and
BellSouth requested, and AT&T’s management provided
BellSouth and its financial advisors with, non-public, financial
projections prepared by AT&T management also during 2005 for
AT&T’s internal budget planning process. In addition,
BellSouth does not provide guidance relating to a period of more
than one-year forward. Further, AT&T’s projections were
finalized shortly
33
following the completion of the merger with ATTC with the
benefit of only a very brief period of combined operations to
observe. A summary of each company’s financial projections
is set forth below.
BellSouth Summary Financial Projections
(all amounts are approximate)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Total Revenues ($000,000)
|
|
$ |
20,400 |
|
|
$ |
20,340 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPS
|
|
$ |
1.96 |
|
|
$ |
2.65 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AT&T Summary Financial Projections
(all amounts are approximate)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Total Revenues ($000,000)
|
|
$ |
63,000 |
|
|
$ |
61,500 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Income ($000,000)
|
|
$ |
5,700 |
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
While the financial projections set forth above were prepared in
good faith by BellSouth’s and AT&T’s managements,
respectively, no assurance can be given regarding future events.
Therefore, such financial projections cannot be considered a
reliable predictor of future operating results, and this
information should not be relied on as such. The financial
projections in this section were not prepared with a view toward
public disclosure or with a view toward complying with the
guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants with respect to prospective financial
information or published guidelines of the SEC regarding
forward-looking statements. The financial projections are not
historical fact and should not be relied upon as being
necessarily indicative of future results. In light of the
foregoing, and considering that the BellSouth and AT&T
shareholder meetings, will be held at least eight months after
the date the financial projections of BellSouth included above
were prepared, and at least six months after the date the
financial projections of AT&T included above were prepared,
as well as the uncertainties inherent in any financial
projections, shareholders are cautioned not to rely on these
financial projections.
The prospective financial information of BellSouth included in
this Form
S-4 has
been prepared by, and is the responsibility of, BellSouth’s
management. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has neither examined nor
compiled the accompanying prospective financial information and,
accordingly, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP does not express an
opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto. The
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP report
incorporated by reference into
this Form
S-4
relates to BellSouth’s historical financial information. It
does not extend to the prospective financial information and
should not be read to do so. The prospective financial
information of AT&T included in this Form S-4 has been
prepared by, and is the responsibility of, AT&T’s
management. Ernst & Young LLP has neither examined nor
compiled the accompanying financial projections of AT&T and,
accordingly, Ernst & Young LLP expresses no opinion or
any other form of assurance with respect thereto. The
Ernst & Young LLP report,
incorporated by reference
into this document relate to AT&T’s historical
financial information. They do not extend to the financial
projections and should not be read to do so.
BellSouth’s financial projections were prepared using
generally accepted accounting principles and using the same
methodologies, to the extent applicable, as those used to
prepare its historical financial statements. Significant
assumptions underlying BellSouth’s financial projections
included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
• |
the current economic expansion would continue through the
periods covered by the projections with the Southeast economy
marginally outperforming the U.S. average; |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
• |
during the periods covered by the projections there would be an
overall increase in demand for communications services, but
continued negative impacts on demand for traditional wireline
service due to wireline competition and product substitution; |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
• |
competitive pressures would continue to drive retail line losses
through 2007; |
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
| |
• |
there would be a shift in where wireline competitive losses
occur, moving from traditional wholesale-based competition and
wireless substitution, to more facilities-based competition
(VoIP/cable voice); |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
• |
growth rate in long distance, and to a lesser extent, DSL
subscribers and revenues would slow in comparison to recent
trends due to higher penetration of the customer base; |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
• |
there would be a moderate decline in BellSouth’s expenses
in 2006 and 2007 as previously announced headcount reductions
and productivity increases more than offset wage inflation; |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
• |
BellSouth’s level of capital spending would be consistent
with recent trends measured as a percentage of revenue; |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
• |
BellSouth would realize significantly improving equity earnings
from Cingular Wireless; |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
• |
BellSouth would complete its previously announced
$2 billion share repurchase by the end of 2007; and |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
• |
no provision for the potential material effects of extraordinary
business events, such as adverse regulatory developments, major
new product launches or natural disasters. |
|
|
AT&T’s financial projections were prepared using
generally accepted accounting principles and using the same
methodologies, to the extent applicable, as those used to
prepare its historical financial statements. Significant
assumptions underlying AT&T’s financial projections
included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
• |
realization of significantly improving equity earnings from
Cingular Wireless; |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
• |
continued realization of SBC/ ATTC merger-related synergies; |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
• |
an overall increase in the market for total communication
services, but a continued decline in traditional voice services
due to shifts from retail access lines to alternative
technologies, such as wireless, VoIP and cable; |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
• |
continued expansion of DSL; |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
• |
a continued decline in revenues from its subsidiary ATTC, but at
a decreasing rate; and |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
• |
significant increases in capital expenditures from 2005 levels
due primarily to the acquisition of ATTC and Project Lightspeed. |
|
|
The estimates and assumptions underlying the financial
projections of BellSouth and AT&T involve judgments with
respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive,
regulatory and financial market conditions and future business
decisions. In any event, these estimates and assumptions may not
be realized and are inherently subject to significant business,
economic, competitive and regulatory uncertainties, all of which
are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the
control of BellSouth and AT&T and will be beyond the control
of the combined company after the merger. In addition, the
financial projections prepared by BellSouth and AT&T
represent each company’s own evaluation of its future
financial performance on a stand-alone basis, and without
reference to transaction-related costs or benefits. Accordingly,
there can be no assurance that the projected results would be
realized or that actual results would not differ materially from
those presented in the financial projections. The inclusion of
these financial projections should not be interpreted as an
indication that AT&T and BellSouth consider this information
a reliable prediction of future results, and this information
should not be relied on for that purpose. AT&T and its
management did not participate in preparing, and does not
express any view on, the BellSouth financial projections
summarized above, or the assumptions underlying such financial
projections. BellSouth and its management did not participate in
preparing, and does not express any view on, the AT&T
financial projections summarized above, or the assumptions
underlying such financial projections. AT&T has publicly
disclosed certain expectations concerning the financial
prospects of the combined company. In its analysis of the
merger, AT&T utilized different amounts for BellSouth, which
were more conservative than those included above for BellSouth.
Shareholders are cautioned not to add the amounts set forth
above (or take into account the Pro Forma adjustments set forth
under
“Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information as of and for the Quarter Ended March 31,
2006” beginning on page 98 and under
“Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Income for the Year
Ended December 31, 2005” beginning on page 109)
in order to obtain a view as to projections
35
for the combined company. These projections are not included in
this document in order to induce any AT&T shareholder to
vote in favor of authorizing the issuance of shares required to
be issued to BellSouth shareholders pursuant to the merger
agreement, or any BellSouth shareholder to vote to approve the
merger agreement, or to impact any investment decision with
respect to AT&T common shares. See “Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” beginning
on page 137.
NEITHER BELLSOUTH NOR AT&T HAS UPDATED AND NEITHER BELLSOUTH
NOR AT&T INTENDS TO UPDATE OR OTHERWISE REVISE THESE
PROJECTIONS TO REFLECT CIRCUMSTANCES EXISTING SINCE THEIR
PREPARATION OR TO REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE OF UNANTICIPATED EVENTS
EVEN IN THE EVENT THAT ANY OR ALL OF THE UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS
ARE SHOWN TO BE IN ERROR. FURTHERMORE, BELLSOUTH AND AT&T
HAVE NOT UPDATED AND DO NOT INTEND TO UPDATE OR REVISE THESE
PROJECTIONS TO REFLECT CHANGES IN GENERAL ECONOMIC OR INDUSTRY
CONDITIONS.
Opinions of AT&T’s Financial Advisors
Descriptions of the fairness opinions of AT&T’s
financial advisors in connection with the merger, Lehman
Brothers and Evercore, are set forth below. These descriptions
are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of
the opinions included as Annexes B and C, respectively, to
this joint proxy statement/prospectus. You are urged to read the
opinions for a discussion of the assumptions made, procedures
followed, matters considered and limitations on the reviews
undertaken by
Lehman Brothers and Evercore in rendering their
respective opinions.
AT&T has, consistent with its historical actions on very
significant transactions, engaged multiple financial advisors
because of the magnitude of the transaction.
AT&T engaged
Lehman Brothers to act as one of its financial
advisors with respect to pursuing a strategic combination with
BellSouth. On
March 4, 2006,
Lehman Brothers rendered its
opinion to the AT&T board of directors that, as of such date
and based upon and subject to the matters stated in its opinion,
from a financial point of view, the exchange ratio in the merger
was fair to AT&T.
The full text of Lehman Brothers’ written opinion, dated
March 4, 2006, is attached as Annex B to this joint
proxy statement/ prospectus. AT&T shareholders are
encouraged to read Lehman Brothers’ opinion carefully and
in its entirety for a description of the assumptions made,
procedures followed, factors considered and limitations upon the
review undertaken by Lehman Brothers in rendering its opinion.
The following is a summary of Lehman Brothers’ opinion and
the methodology that Lehman Brothers used to render its opinion.
This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
full text of the opinion.
Lehman Brothers’ advisory services and opinion were
provided for the use and benefit of the AT&T board of
directors in connection with its consideration of the merger.
Lehman Brothers’ opinion is not intended to be and does not
constitute a recommendation to any shareholder of AT&T as to
how such shareholder should vote in connection with the merger.
Lehman Brothers was not requested to opine as to, and Lehman
Brothers’ opinion does not address, AT&T’s
underlying business decision to proceed with or effect the
merger.
In arriving at its opinion,
Lehman Brothers reviewed and
analyzed, among other things:
|
|
|
| |
• |
the merger agreement and the specific terms of the merger; |
| |
| |
• |
publicly available information concerning AT&T and BellSouth
that Lehman Brothers believed to be relevant to its analysis,
including each of AT&T’s and BellSouth’s Annual
Reports on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005; |
36
|
|
|
| |
• |
financial and operating information with respect to the
businesses, operations and prospects of BellSouth furnished to
Lehman Brothers by BellSouth and AT&T, including
(i) financial projections of BellSouth prepared by
BellSouth’s management, and (ii) financial projections
of BellSouth prepared by AT&T’s management; |
| |
| |
• |
financial and operating information with respect to the
businesses, operations and prospects of AT&T furnished to
Lehman Brothers by AT&T, including (i) financial
projections of AT&T prepared by AT&T’s management,
and (ii) the amount and timing of synergies expected by
AT&T’s management to result from the merger; |
| |
| |
• |
the recent and historical trading prices of AT&T common
shares and of BellSouth common shares and a comparison of each
of these trading histories with each other and other
telecommunications companies that Lehman Brothers deemed
relevant; |
| |
| |
• |
a comparison of the historical financial results, present
financial condition and trading multiples of AT&T and of
BellSouth with each other and with those of other
telecommunications companies that Lehman Brothers deemed
relevant; |
| |
| |
• |
a comparison of the financial terms of the merger with the
financial terms of certain other transactions that Lehman
Brothers deemed relevant; |
| |
| |
• |
published estimates of third party research analysts with
respect to the future financial performance of both AT&T and
BellSouth; |
| |
| |
• |
the relative contributions of AT&T and BellSouth to the
current and future financial performance of the combined company
on a pro forma basis; |
| |
| |
• |
the potential pro forma financial impact of the merger on the
future financial performance of the combined company, including
the expected synergies and the anticipated restructuring charges
and integration costs in connection therewith furnished to it by
AT&T; and |
| |
| |
• |
the potential pro forma financial impact of AT&T’s
share repurchase program which was announced contemporaneously
with the merger. |
In addition,
Lehman Brothers had discussions with the
managements of AT&T and BellSouth concerning their
respective businesses, operations, assets, liabilities,
financial conditions and prospects and the potential strategic
benefits expected by AT&T’s management to result from
the merger.
Lehman Brothers also undertook such other studies,
analyses and investigations as
Lehman Brothers deemed
appropriate.
In arriving at its opinion,
Lehman Brothers assumed and relied
upon the accuracy and completeness of the financial and other
information used by
Lehman Brothers without assuming any
responsibility for independent verification of such information.
Lehman Brothers further relied upon the assurances of the
managements of AT&T and BellSouth that they were not aware
of any facts or circumstances that would make such information
inaccurate or misleading. With respect to the financial
projections of BellSouth prepared by BellSouth’s
management, upon advice of BellSouth and with the consent of
AT&T,
Lehman Brothers assumed that such projections were
reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently
available estimates and judgments of the management of BellSouth
as to the future financial performance of BellSouth. With
respect to the financial projections of BellSouth prepared by
AT&T’s management, upon advice of and with the consent
of AT&T,
Lehman Brothers assumed that such projections were
reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently
available estimates and judgments of the management of AT&T
as to the future financial performance of BellSouth and that
those projections are a reasonable basis upon which to evaluate
the future financial performance of BellSouth, and Lehman
Brothers has primarily relied on those projections in performing
its analyses. With respect to the financial projections of
AT&T,
Lehman Brothers assumed with the consent of AT&T
that those projections were reasonably prepared on a basis
reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments
of the management of AT&T as to the future financial
performance of AT&T and that AT&T would perform on a
stand-alone basis substantially in accordance with those
projections. With respect to the amount and
37
timing of the synergies and the restructuring charges and
integration costs estimated by the management of AT&T to
result from a combination of the businesses of AT&T and
BellSouth,
Lehman Brothers assumed with the consent of AT&T
that the timing and amount of such synergies, charges and
expenses are reasonable and will be realized substantially in
accordance with such estimates. In arriving at its opinion,
Lehman Brothers did not conduct a physical inspection of the
properties or facilities of AT&T or BellSouth and Lehman
Brothers did not make or obtain any evaluation or appraisals of
the assets or liabilities of AT&T or BellSouth. Lehman
Brothers’ opinion was necessarily based upon market,
economic and other conditions as they existed on, and could be
evaluated as of,
March 4, 2006.
In rendering its opinion,
Lehman Brothers expressed no opinion
as to the prices at which AT&T common shares or BellSouth
common shares will trade at any time following the announcement
of the proposed merger or as to the price at which AT&T
common shares will trade at any time following the completion of
the merger.
Lehman Brothers is an internationally recognized investment
banking firm and, as part of its investment banking activities,
is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and their
securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions,
negotiated underwritings, competitive bids, secondary
distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private
placements and valuations for corporate and other purposes.
AT&T selected
Lehman Brothers because of its expertise,
reputation and familiarity with AT&T and the
telecommunications industry generally and because its investment
banking professionals have substantial experience in
transactions comparable to the merger.
Lehman Brothers acted as financial advisor to AT&T in
connection with the merger pursuant to a letter agreement dated
March 4, 2006.
Lehman Brothers received a fee of
$6.5 million in connection with the announcement of the
merger and will receive an additional fee of $19.5 million
upon the completion of the merger or $19 million in the
event that the merger agreement is terminated or the merger is
not otherwise completed and AT&T receives a termination fee
from BellSouth. In addition, AT&T has agreed that, at its
sole discretion, it may pay
Lehman Brothers a discretionary
bonus payment, based upon AT&T’s evaluation of the
quality and quantity of the work performed and the value added
by
Lehman Brothers prior to the closing of the merger. As of the
date hereof, AT&T has not made any decision as to whether or
not any discretionary bonus will be paid, or, if so, the amount
that would be paid. In addition, AT&T has agreed to
reimburse
Lehman Brothers for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in connection with the merger and to indemnify Lehman
Brothers for certain liabilities that may arise out of its
engagement by AT&T and the rendering of Lehman
Brothers’ opinion.
Lehman Brothers in the past has rendered investment banking
services to AT&T, BellSouth and their affiliates and
received an aggregate of approximately $61 million and
$16 million in fees from AT&T and BellSouth and their
affiliates, respectively, over the past two years. These amounts
include AT&T’s and BellSouth’s respective pro rata
share of fees paid by Cingular Wireless to
Lehman Brothers over
the past two years.
Lehman Brothers may provide AT&T and its
affiliates with investment banking services in the future for
which it may receive compensation.
In the ordinary course of its business,
Lehman Brothers may
actively trade in the debt or equity securities of AT&T and
BellSouth for its own account and for the accounts of its
customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short
position in such securities.
Evercore Group Inc. Fairness Opinion
Evercore has acted as one of AT&T’s financial advisors
in connection with the merger. In connection with
Evercore’s engagement, the AT&T board of directors
requested that Evercore render an opinion with respect to the
fairness, from a financial point of view, to AT&T, of the
exchange ratio. At the meeting of the AT&T board of
directors on
March 4, 2006, Evercore rendered its oral
opinion, which was subsequently confirmed in writing dated
March 4, 2006, that, based upon and subject to the matters
described in its opinion, the exchange ratio was fair, from a
financial point of view, to AT&T.
38
The full text of Evercore’s opinion, dated March 4,
2006, which sets forth, among other things, the procedures
followed, matters considered and limitations of the review
undertaken in connection with its opinion, is attached as
Annex C to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and is
incorporated herein by reference. The summary of Evercore’s
fairness opinion set forth in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the full text of the opinion. Shareholders should read the
opinion carefully and in its entirety.
Evercore’s opinion is directed to the board of directors of
AT&T, addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of
view, to AT&T of the exchange ratio and does not address any
other aspect or implication of the merger or any other
agreement, arrangement or understanding entered into in
connection with the merger or otherwise. Evercore’s opinion
does not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder of
AT&T as to how such shareholder should vote or act with
respect to any matter relating to the merger.
In arriving at its opinion, Evercore, among other things:
|
|
|
| |
• |
analyzed certain publicly available financial statements and
other publicly available business information relating to
AT&T and BellSouth that Evercore deemed relevant to its
analysis; |
| |
| |
• |
analyzed certain internal non-public financial and operating
data concerning AT&T and BellSouth prepared and furnished to
Evercore by the management of each of AT&T and BellSouth,
respectively, and AT&T provided Evercore with, and reviewed
with Evercore, the estimated amount and timing of the synergies
as well as the expected restructuring charges; |
| |
| |
• |
analyzed certain financial projections concerning AT&T and
BellSouth furnished to Evercore by the management of AT&T
and certain financial projections concerning BellSouth furnished
to Evercore by the management of BellSouth; |
| |
| |
• |
discussed the past and current operations and financial
condition and the prospects of AT&T and BellSouth with the
management of each of AT&T and BellSouth, respectively; |
| |
| |
• |
reviewed the reported prices and trading activity of the
BellSouth common shares and the AT&T common shares; |
| |
| |
• |
compared the financial performance of BellSouth and the prices
and trading activity of the BellSouth common shares with that of
selected publicly traded telecommunications companies and their
securities; |
| |
| |
• |
compared the financial performance of AT&T and the prices
and trading activity of AT&T common shares with that of
selected publicly traded telecommunications companies and their
securities; |
| |
| |
• |
compared the proposed financial terms of the merger with
publicly available financial terms of certain transactions that
Evercore deemed reasonably comparable to the merger; |
| |
| |
• |
considered the potential financial impact of AT&T’s
contemplated share repurchase program expected to be announced
contemporaneously with the transaction; |
| |
| |
• |
considered the potential pro forma impact of the merger on
AT&T, based on inputs and analysis provided by AT&T
management; |
| |
| |
• |
reviewed a draft of the merger agreement dated March 4,
2006, which Evercore assumed was in substantially final form and
would not vary in any respect material to its analysis; and |
| |
| |
• |
performed such other analyses and examinations and considered
such other factors as Evercore in its sole judgment deemed
appropriate for purposes of its opinion. |
For purposes of its analyses and opinion, Evercore relied upon
and assumed, without assuming any responsibility for
independently verifying, the accuracy and completeness of all
the financial and other information that was publicly available
or was furnished to it by BellSouth or AT&T or otherwise
39
discussed with or reviewed by or for Evercore, and it has not
assumed any liability therefor. Evercore further relied upon the
assurances of the management of AT&T and BellSouth,
respectively, that they are not aware of any facts that would
make such information inaccurate or misleading. Evercore has not
made nor assumed any responsibility for making any valuation or
appraisal of any assets or liabilities of AT&T or BellSouth,
nor have any such valuations or appraisals been provided to
Evercore, nor has Evercore evaluated the solvency of AT&T or
BellSouth under any state or federal laws relating to
bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters.
With respect to the AT&T and BellSouth projections provided
to Evercore by AT&T management and the BellSouth projections
provided to Evercore by BellSouth management, Evercore assumed
that such projections were reasonably prepared on a basis
reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments
of each of the management of AT&T and BellSouth,
respectively, as to future financial performance. With respect
to the synergies and expected restructuring charges estimated by
the management of AT&T to result from the merger, Evercore
assumed that the timing and amounts of such synergies and
expected restructuring charges are reasonable. Evercore
expressed no view as to such financial analyses and forecasts,
the synergies and the expected restructuring charges or the
assumptions on which they were based. Evercore also assumed that
the merger would qualify as a tax-free reorganization for United
States federal income tax purposes, and that the merger and the
other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement would be
completed as described in the merger agreement and without any
waiver, amendment or modification of any terms or conditions
that are material to Evercore’s opinion. Evercore further
assumed that all required governmental, regulatory or other
consents and approvals necessary for the completion of the
merger would be obtained without any regulatory material adverse
effect. Evercore also assumed that the final form of the merger
agreement would not differ in any material respect from the last
draft reviewed by Evercore.
Evercore’s opinion was necessarily based on economic,
market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information
made available to it as of,
March 4, 2006. It should be
understood that subsequent developments may affect
Evercore’s opinion and that Evercore does not have any
obligation to update, revise, or reaffirm its opinion.
Evercore’s opinion was limited to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to AT&T of the exchange ratio and
it expressed no opinion as to the underlying decision by
AT&T to engage in the merger. Evercore expressed no opinion
as to the price at which AT&T common shares would trade at
any future time.
AT&T engaged Evercore to act as a financial advisor based on
its qualifications, experience and reputation and its knowledge
of the business of AT&T. Evercore is an internationally
recognized investment banking firm and is regularly engaged in
the valuation of businesses in connection with mergers and
acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, competitive biddings, private
placements and valuations for corporate and other purposes.
Evercore acted as financial advisor to AT&T with respect to
the proposed merger pursuant to a letter agreement dated
March 4, 2006. Evercore received a fee of $6.5 million
in connection with the announcement of the merger and will
receive an additional fee of $19.5 million (which may be
increased by AT&T at its sole discretion) upon the
completion of the merger. In addition, AT&T has agreed to
reimburse Evercore’s expenses and indemnify Evercore and
its members, partners, officers, directors, advisors,
representatives, employees, agents, affiliates and controlling
persons, if any, against certain liabilities and expenses,
including certain liabilities under the federal securities laws,
related to or arising out of Evercore’s engagement and any
related transactions.
Evercore has in the past rendered investment banking services to
AT&T or its predecessors and received an aggregate of
approximately $44 million in fees from AT&T or its
predecessors over the past two years. In addition, in the
future, Evercore may provide, or seek to provide, financial
advice and investment banking services to the combined company
for which it may receive compensation.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses of
Lehman Brothers and Evercore and which underlie the respective
opinions of
Lehman Brothers and Evercore delivered to the
AT&T board of
40
directors on
March 4, 2006. The analyses were prepared on a
joint basis by
Lehman Brothers and Evercore.
The financial
analyses summarized below include information presented in
tabular format. In order to fully understand the financial
analyses used by Lehman Brothers and Evercore, the tables must
be read together with the text of each summary. Considering any
portion of such analyses and of the factors considered, without
considering all analyses and factors, could create a misleading
or incomplete view of the process underlying Lehman
Brothers’ and Evercore’s opinions.
|
|
|
Historical Share Price Analysis |
Lehman Brothers and Evercore considered historical data with
regard to the trading prices of the AT&T common shares and
the BellSouth common shares for the period from
March 3,
2005 to
March 3, 2006. During this period, the closing
stock price of the AT&T common shares ranged from a low of
$22.10 to a high of $28.45 per share, and the closing price
of the BellSouth common shares ranged from a low of $24.51 to a
high of $31.88 per share. During this period, the intraday
stock price of the AT&T common shares ranged from a low of
$21.75 to a high of $28.82 per share, and the intraday
stock price of the BellSouth common shares ranged from a low of
$24.32 to a high of $32.40 per share. The foregoing
historical share price analysis was provided for background
information and perspective with respect to the relative
historical share prices of the AT&T common shares and the
BellSouth common shares.
|
|
|
Historical Exchange Ratio Analysis |
Lehman Brothers and Evercore compared the historical closing per
share prices of the AT&T common shares and the BellSouth
common shares over different periods during the three years
preceding
March 4, 2006 in order to determine the implied
average exchange ratios that existed during those periods. The
52 week high exchange ratio represents the highest ratio of
the closing price of the BellSouth common shares on any
particular day during such period to the closing price of the
AT&T common shares on the same day. The 52 week low
exchange ratio represents the lowest ratio of the closing price
of the BellSouth common shares on any particular day during such
period to the closing price of the AT&T common shares on the
same day. The following table indicates the implied exchange
ratio of AT&T common shares for BellSouth common shares for
the periods indicated:
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Exchange Ratio | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
1.124x |
|
|
10 day trading average
|
|
|
1.133x |
|
|
30 day trading average
|
|
|
1.105x |
|
|
60 day trading average
|
|
|
1.106x |
|
|
90 day trading average
|
|
|
1.103x |
|
|
One year average
|
|
|
1.108x |
|
|
|
|
|
1.156x |
|
|
|
|
|
1.065x |
|
|
Three year average
|
|
|
1.089x |
|
Lehman Brothers and Evercore compared selected recent publicly
available research analyst price targets, as of
March 3,
2006 (the last trading day prior to the delivery of Lehman
Brothers’ and Evercore’s respective opinions), from
selected firms.
Lehman Brothers and Evercore selected the firms
listed based on the availability of publicly disclosed price
targets for both AT&T and BellSouth. Other firms provided a
price target for one but not both companies. In performing this
analysis,
Lehman Brothers and Evercore utilized research analyst
price targets from the following firms:
41
|
|
|
| |
• |
Credit Suisse |
| |
| |
• |
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. |
| |
| |
• |
Morgan Stanley |
| |
| |
• |
UBS Securities LLC |
| |
| |
• |
Wachovia Securities LLC |
For each firm,
Lehman Brothers and Evercore calculated the
implied exchange ratios based on the price targets for AT&T
and BellSouth, respectively. The analysis yielded implied
exchange ratios ranging from 0.93x to 1.23x.
|
|
|
Peer Group Trading Analysis |
In order to assess how the public market values shares of
similar publicly traded companies,
Lehman Brothers and Evercore,
based on their experience with companies in the
telecommunications industry, reviewed and compared specific
financial and operating data relating to AT&T and BellSouth
with the following peer companies that
Lehman Brothers and
Evercore selected because they have certain characteristics that
are similar to those of AT&T and BellSouth:
|
|
|
| |
• |
Verizon Communications Inc. |
| |
| |
• |
Qwest Communications International Inc. |
| |
| |
• |
Sprint Nextel Corporation |
As part of their peer group trading analysis,
Lehman Brothers
and Evercore calculated and analyzed the ratio of current stock
price to estimated 2006 earnings per share (commonly referred to
as a price/earnings ratio) for AT&T, BellSouth and each
member of the peer group.
Lehman Brothers and Evercore also
calculated and analyzed the ratio of enterprise value to
estimated 2006 earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization, which we refer to as EBITDA, for AT&T,
BellSouth and each member of the peer group, which included the
applicable proportionate amount of Cingular’s EBITDA in the
case of AT&T and BellSouth. The enterprise value of each
company was obtained by adding its short and long term debt,
including a proportional amount of Cingular net debt, to the sum
of the market value of its common equity, and the book value of
any minority interest, and subtracting its cash and cash
equivalents and market value of unconsolidated investments. All
of these calculations were performed based on closing prices as
of
March 3, 2006, the last trading date prior to the
delivery of
Lehman Brothers’ and Evercore’s respective
opinions.
The analysis of the current price/earnings ratios indicated
that, for the selected peer group, the current price/earnings
ratios, based on estimated 2006 earnings per share, ranged from
13.8x to 14.4x. This compared to current price/earnings ratios,
based on estimated 2006 earnings per share, of 14.0x for
AT&T and 13.7x for BellSouth, based on public research
estimates.
The analysis of financial multiples indicated that, for the
selected peer group, current enterprise value as a multiple of
estimated 2006 EBITDA ranged from 5.1x to 6.2x for 2006. This
compared to enterprise value as a multiple of estimated 2006
EBITDA of 5.2x for AT&T and 6.0x for BellSouth, based on
public research estimates.
Lehman Brothers and Evercore calculated implied exchange ratios
based on the peer group trading analysis ranging from 0.93x to
1.27x.
Lehman Brothers and Evercore selected the peer group above
because their businesses and operating profiles are reasonably
similar to that of AT&T and BellSouth. However, because of
the inherent differences between the business, operations and
prospects of AT&T and BellSouth and the businesses,
operations and prospects of the selected peer group, no company
is exactly the same as AT&T or BellSouth. As a result, these
analyses are not purely mathematical, but also take into account
differences in financial and operating characteristics of the
subject companies and other factors that could affect the public
trading value of the subject companies to which AT&T and
BellSouth are being compared.
42
|
|
|
Sum of the Parts Analysis |
Lehman Brothers and Evercore performed a
“sum of the
parts” analysis of BellSouth by valuing each of the
individual business segments individually and deriving from
there a range of values for BellSouth as a whole. The BellSouth
business segments considered were Wireline, Wireless (40% of
Cingular) and Directories. Using various methodologies that the
AT&T financial advisors deemed appropriate for each business
segment analyzed, the analysis indicated a range of equity
values per BellSouth common share ranging from $32.73 to $39.73.
Lehman Brothers and Evercore performed a
“sum of the
parts” analysis of AT&T by valuing each of the
individual business segments individually and deriving from
there a range of values for AT&T as a whole. The AT&T
business segments considered were Wireline, Wireless (60% of
Cingular) and Directories. Using various methodologies that the
AT&T financial advisors deemed appropriate for each business
segment analyzed, the analysis indicated a range of equity
values per AT&T common share ranging from $31.94 to
$38.24 per share.
Lehman Brothers and Evercore calculated implied exchange ratios
based on the sum of the parts analysis ranging from 0.86x to
1.24x.
Lehman Brothers and Evercore analyzed the respective
contributions of AT&T and BellSouth to the estimated
calendar years 2006, 2007 and 2008 EBITDA and Net Income of the
combined company based on estimates provided by AT&T
management, and excluding the effect of expected synergies. This
analysis indicated the following relative contributions of
AT&T and BellSouth and the following implied exchange ratios:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Contribution | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2006E | |
|
2007E | |
|
2008E | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
AT&T
|
|
|
66% |
|
|
|
66% |
|
|
|
67% |
|
| |
BellSouth
|
|
|
34% |
|
|
|
34% |
|
|
|
33% |
|
| |
Implied Exchange Ratio
|
|
|
0.98x |
|
|
|
0.96x |
|
|
|
0.91x |
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
AT&T
|
|
|
64% |
|
|
|
65% |
|
|
|
67% |
|
| |
BellSouth
|
|
|
36% |
|
|
|
35% |
|
|
|
33% |
|
| |
Implied Exchange Ratio
|
|
|
1.21x |
|
|
|
1.15x |
|
|
|
1.06x |
|
Lehman Brothers and Evercore calculated implied exchange ratios
based on the contribution analysis ranging from 0.91x to 1.21x.
|
|
|
Precedent Transaction Analysis |
Using publicly available information,
Lehman Brothers and
Evercore reviewed and compared the multiple of enterprise value
to one year forward EBITDA paid in eight acquisitions of
companies that
Lehman Brothers and Evercore, based on their
experience with merger and acquisition transactions,
43
deemed relevant to arriving at their respective opinions. Lehman
Brothers and Evercore reviewed the following transactions:
| |
|
|
|
|
| Date Announced |
|
Acquiror |
|
Target |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBC Communications Inc. |
|
PacificTelesis Group |
|
|
|
Bell Atlantic Corporation |
|
NYNEX Corporation |
|
|
|
SBC Communications Inc. |
|
Southern New England Telecommunications Corporation |
|
|
|
SBC Communications Inc. |
|
Ameritech Corporation |
|
|
|
Bell Atlantic Corporation |
|
GTE Corporation |
|
|
|
Qwest Communications International Inc. |
|
U S WEST, Inc. |
|
|
|
Cingular Wireless LLC |
|
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. |
|
|
|
Sprint Corporation |
|
Nextel Communications, Inc. |
The following table presents the results of this analysis:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
Mean | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Ratio of Enterprise Value to 12-Month Forward EBITDA
|
|
|
5.5 |
x |
|
|
9.5 |
x |
|
|
7.5x |
|
Based on this analysis,
Lehman Brothers and Evercore calculated
a range of implied exchange ratios based on the precedent
transaction analysis ranging from 1.31x to 1.56x by applying a
range of 7.0x to 8.0x to
12-month forward EBITDA
for BellSouth based on the EBITDA estimates of BellSouth
provided by AT&T management.
Lehman Brothers and Evercore selected the precedent transactions
on the basis of various factors, including size and similarity
of the line of business of the relevant entities. However, no
precedent transaction is identical to the merger. As a result,
these analyses are not purely mathematical, but also take into
account differences in financial and operating characteristics
of the subject companies and other factors that could affect the
transactions to which the merger is being compared.
Lehman Brothers and Evercore reviewed the premia paid in all
all-stock transactions valued at greater than $25 billion
during the ten year period preceding
March 3, 2006. Lehman
Brothers and Evercore calculated the premium per share paid by
the acquirer compared to the share price of the target company
prevailing (i) one day, (ii) one week and
(iii) four weeks prior to the announcement of the
transaction, producing mean premia of 25%, 29% and 32%,
respectively. This analysis yielded an implied valuation range
for the BellSouth common shares of $39.43 to $41.61 per
share.
Lehman Brothers and Evercore calculated implied exchange ratios
based on the premia paid analysis ranging from 1.41x to 1.49x.
|
|
|
BellSouth Discounted Cash Flow Analysis |
As part of their analysis, and in order to estimate the present
value of the BellSouth common shares,
Lehman Brothers and
Evercore also prepared discounted cash flow analyses for
BellSouth (including its proportional share of Cingular) of
after-tax unlevered free cash flows based on AT&T management
estimates for fiscal years 2006 through 2015, based on consensus
research estimates for fiscal years 2006 through 2010, and based
on BellSouth management estimates for fiscal years 2006 through
2008.
A discounted cash flow analysis is a traditional valuation
methodology used to derive a valuation of an asset by
calculating the “present value” of estimated future
cash flows of the asset. “Present value” refers to the
current value of future cash flows or amounts and is obtained by
discounting those future cash flows or amounts by a selected
discount rate.
44
Lehman Brothers and Evercore performed discounted cash flow
analyses for BellSouth (including its proportional share of
Cingular) by:
|
|
|
| |
• |
adding the present value of BellSouth’s projected after-tax
unlevered free cash flows for fiscal years 2006 through 2015
based on AT&T management estimates to the present value of
the terminal value of BellSouth as of December 31, 2015
based on AT&T management estimates; |
| |
| |
• |
adding the present value of BellSouth’s projected after-tax
unlevered free cash flows for fiscal years 2006 through 2010
based on consensus research estimates to the present value of
the terminal value as of December 31, 2010 based on
consensus research estimates; and |
| |
| |
• |
adding the present value of BellSouth’s projected after-tax
unlevered free cash flows for fiscal years 2006 through 2008
based on BellSouth management estimates to the present value of
the terminal value of BellSouth as of December 31, 2008
based on BellSouth management estimates. |
“Terminal value” refers to the value of all future
cash flows from an asset at a particular point in time. Lehman
Brothers and Evercore estimated a range of terminal values in
2015 based on AT&T management estimates, in 2010 based on
consensus research estimates, and in 2008 based on BellSouth
management estimates calculated based on selected free cash flow
perpetuity growth rates of 1.0% to 2.0% for AT&T management
estimates and 1.5% to 2.5% for BellSouth management estimates
and consensus research estimates. The perpetuity growth rates
utilized in this analysis were chosen by
Lehman Brothers and
Evercore based on their expertise and experience with the
telecommunications industry.
Lehman Brothers and Evercore
discounted the unlevered free cash flow streams and the
estimated terminal value to a present value at a range of
discount rates from 7.5% to 8.5%. The discount rates utilized in
this analysis were chosen by
Lehman Brothers and Evercore based
on their expertise and experience with the telecommunications
industry and also on an analysis of the weighted average cost of
capital of BellSouth and other comparable companies. Lehman
Brothers and Evercore calculated per share equity values by
first determining a range of enterprise values of BellSouth by
adding the present values of the after-tax unlevered free cash
flows and terminal values for each EBITDA terminal multiple and
discount rate scenario, and then subtracting from the enterprise
values the net debt (which is total debt minus cash including
proportional net debt of Cingular) of BellSouth, and dividing
those amounts by the number of fully diluted shares of BellSouth.
Based on the projections and assumptions set forth above
(including the midpoint of the terminal value range), the
discounted cash flow analysis of BellSouth yielded an implied
valuation range of BellSouth common shares of $27.84 to $48.80,
excluding the impact of an estimated $18 billion of net
present value of cost savings and revenue synergies estimated by
AT&T management to result from the transaction. With the
inclusion of estimated synergies, the valuation yielded an
implied valuation range of BellSouth common shares of $38.18 to
$59.15.
|
|
|
AT&T Discounted Cash Flow Analysis |
As part of their analysis, and in order to estimate the present
value of the AT&T common shares,
Lehman Brothers and
Evercore prepared discounted cash flow analyses for AT&T
(including its proportional share of Cingular) of after-tax
unlevered free cash flows for fiscal years 2006 through 2013
based on AT&T management estimates and for fiscal years 2006
through 2010 based on consensus research estimates.
Lehman Brothers and Evercore performed discounted cash flow
analyses for AT&T (including its proportional share of
Cingular) by:
|
|
|
| |
• |
adding the present value of AT&T’s projected after-tax
unlevered free cash flows for fiscal years 2006 through 2013
based on AT&T management estimates to the present value of
the “terminal value” of AT&T as of
December 31, 2013 based on AT&T management
estimates; and |
45
|
|
|
| |
• |
adding the present value of AT&T’s projected after-tax
unlevered free cash flows for fiscal years 2006 through 2010
based on consensus research estimates to the present value of
the “terminal value” of AT&T as of
December 31, 2010 based on consensus research estimates. |
Lehman Brothers and Evercore estimated a range of terminal
values in 2013 based on AT&T management estimates and in
2010 based on consensus research estimates calculated based on
selected free cash flow perpetuity growth rates of 1.0% to 2.0%
for AT&T management estimates and from 1.5% to 2.5% for
consensus research estimates. The perpetuity growth rates
utilized in this analysis were chosen by
Lehman Brothers and
Evercore based on their expertise and experience with the
telecommunications industry.
Lehman Brothers and Evercore
discounted the unlevered free cash flow streams and the
estimated terminal value to a present value at a range of
discount rates from 7.5% to 8.5%. The discount rates utilized in
this analysis were chosen by
Lehman Brothers and Evercore based
on their expertise and experience with the telecommunications
industry and also on an analysis of the weighted average cost of
capital of AT&T and other comparable companies. Lehman
Brothers and Evercore calculated per share equity values by
first determining a range of enterprise values of AT&T by
adding the present values of the after-tax unlevered free cash
flows and terminal values for each EBITDA terminal multiple and
discount rate scenario, and then subtracting from the enterprise
values the net debt (which is total debt minus cash including
proportional net debt of Cingular) and adding the market value
of unconsolidated investments of AT&T, and dividing those
amounts by the number of fully diluted shares of AT&T.
Based on the projections and assumptions set forth above
(including the midpoint of the terminal value range), the
discounted cash flow analysis of AT&T yielded an implied
valuation range of AT&T common shares of $29.09 to $48.84.
Lehman Brothers and Evercore calculated implied exchange ratios
based on the discounted cash flow analysis ranging from 0.57x to
1.68x, excluding the impact of an estimated $18 billion of
net present value of cost savings and revenue synergies
estimated by AT&T management to result from the transaction.
With the inclusion of estimated synergies, the analysis yielded
implied exchange ratios ranging from 0.78x to 2.03x.
In order to evaluate the estimated ongoing impact of the merger,
Lehman Brothers and Evercore analyzed the pro forma earnings
effect of the merger from the perspective of AT&T
shareholders. For the purposes of this analysis,
Lehman Brothers
and Evercore assumed (i) a $37.09 per share price for
the BellSouth common shares (the price per share of AT&T
common shares multiplied by the exchange ratio), (ii) a
$27.99 per share price for the AT&T common shares (the
closing market price per share on
March 3, 2006),
(iii) a merger structure with 100% stock consideration,
(iv) earnings estimates for each company provided by
management of AT&T, (v) an estimated $18 billion
of net present value of synergies from the transaction based on
the estimates of the management of AT&T, and (vi) the
repurchase by AT&T of $2 billion of the AT&T common
shares in 2006 and $8 billion of the AT&T common shares
in 2007.
Lehman Brothers and Evercore estimated that, based on
the assumptions described above, the pro forma impact of the
transaction on the earnings per share of AT&T, excluding the
amortization of intangibles and integration costs would be
approximately 1% dilutive in 2007, and then approximately 3%, 5%
and 5% accretive in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. The
estimates that underlie this analysis are subject to substantial
uncertainty and, therefore, actual results may be substantially
different.
In connection with the review of the merger by AT&T’s
board of directors, each of
Lehman Brothers and Evercore
performed a variety of financial and comparative analyses for
purposes of rendering its respective opinion. The preparation of
a fairness opinion is a complex process and is not necessarily
susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. In
arriving at its respective opinion, each of
Lehman Brothers and
Evercore considered the results of all of their analyses as a
whole. Furthermore,
Lehman Brothers and Evercore believe that
the summary provided and the analyses described above must be
46
considered as a whole and that selecting any portion of their
analyses, without considering all of them, would create an
incomplete view of the process underlying their analyses and
opinion. In addition,
Lehman Brothers and Evercore may have
given various factors more or less weight than other factors and
may have deemed various assumptions more or less probable than
other assumptions, so that the ranges of valuations resulting
from any particular analysis described above should not be taken
to be
Lehman Brothers’ and Evercore’s view of the
actual value of AT&T or BellSouth. No limitations were
imposed by AT&T on the scope of
Lehman Brothers’ and
Evercore’s investigations or the procedures followed by
Lehman Brothers and Evercore in rendering their opinions.
In performing their analyses,
Lehman Brothers and Evercore made
numerous assumptions with respect to risks associated with
industry performance, general business and economic conditions
and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of
AT&T or BellSouth. Any estimates contained in these analyses
are not necessarily indicative of future results or actual
values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than
those suggested by such estimates. The analyses performed were
prepared solely as part of
Lehman Brothers’ and
Evercore’s analysis of the fairness of the exchange ratio
from a financial point of view to AT&T and were prepared in
connection with the delivery by each of
Lehman Brothers and
Evercore of their respective opinions, dated
March 4, 2006,
to AT&T’s board of directors.
The terms of the merger were determined through arm’s
length negotiations between AT&T and BellSouth. Lehman
Brothers and Evercore did not recommend any specific exchange
ratio or form of consider