Filed On 3/17/06 5:06pm ET · SEC File 333-132550 · Accession Number 950123-6-3359
As Of Filer Filing For/On/As Docs:Size Issuer Agent
3/17/06 Commvault Systems Inc S-1 8:227 Bowne of NY City...01/FA
Document/Exhibit Description Pages Size
1: S-1 Registration Statement (General Form) HTML 1.12M
2: EX-10.5 Ex-10.5: Employment Agreement 18 50K
3: EX-10.6 Ex-10.6: Employment Agreement 17 46K
4: EX-10.7 Ex-10.7: Form of Corporation Change of Control 4 28K
Agreement
5: EX-10.8 Ex-10.8: Form of Corporate Change of Control 4 28K
Agreement
6: EX-10.9 Ex-10.9: Form of Imdemnity Agreement 8 42K
7: EX-21.1 Ex-21.1: List of Subsidiaries 1 5K
8: EX-23.1 Ex-23.1: Consent of Ernst & Young Llp HTML 6K
| Page | (sequential) | | | | (alphabetic) | Top |
|---|
| | |
- Alternative Formats (Word, et al.)
- Business
- Capitalization
- Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
- Certain United States Federal Tax Considerations to Non-U.S. Holders
- Concurrent Private Placement, The
- Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2004 and 2005 and December 31, 2005 (unaudited)
- Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and the nine months ended December 31, 2004 (unaudited) and 2005 (unaudited)
- Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended March 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and the nine months ended December 31, 2004 (unaudited) and 2005 (unaudited)
- Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Deficit for the years ended March 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and the nine months ended December 31, 2005 (unaudited)
- Description of Capital Stock
- Dilution
- Dividend Policy
- Experts
- Forward-Looking Statements
- Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule
- Legal Matters
- Management
- Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
- Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
- Principal and Selling Stockholders
- Prospectus Summary
- Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
- Risk Factors
- Schedule II -- Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
- Selected Financial Data
- Shares Eligible for Future Sale
- Table of Contents
- The Concurrent Private Placement
- Underwriting
- Use of Proceeds
- Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
- Where You Can Find More Information
|
| 1 | 1st Page - Filing Submission
|
| " | Table of Contents
|
| " | Prospectus Summary
|
| " | Risk Factors
|
| " | Forward-Looking Statements
|
| " | Use of Proceeds
|
| " | Dividend Policy
|
| " | Capitalization
|
| " | Dilution
|
| " | Selected Financial Data
|
| " | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
| " | Business
|
| " | Management
|
| " | The Concurrent Private Placement
|
| " | Principal and Selling Stockholders
|
| " | Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
|
| " | Description of Capital Stock
|
| " | Shares Eligible for Future Sale
|
| " | Certain United States Federal Tax Considerations to Non-U.S. Holders
|
| " | Underwriting
|
| " | Legal Matters
|
| " | Experts
|
| " | Where You Can Find More Information
|
| " | Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule
|
| " | Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
| " | Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2004 and 2005 and December 31, 2005 (unaudited)
|
| " | Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended March 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and the nine months ended December 31, 2004 (unaudited) and 2005 (unaudited)
|
| " | Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Deficit for the years ended March 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and the nine months ended December 31, 2005 (unaudited)
|
| " | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and the nine months ended December 31, 2004 (unaudited) and 2005 (unaudited)
|
| " | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
| " | Schedule II -- Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
This is an EDGAR HTML document rendered as filed. [ Alternative Formats ]
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 17, 2006
Registration
No. 333-
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
CommVault Systems, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
7372 |
|
22-3447504 |
|
(State of incorporation) |
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
2 Crescent Place
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
CommVault Systems, Inc.
2 Crescent Place
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
Copies to:
| |
|
|
|
Philip J. Niehoff, Esq. |
|
William J. Whelan, III, Esq. |
|
John R. Sagan, Esq. |
|
LizabethAnn R. Eisen, Esq. |
|
Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP |
|
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP |
|
71 South Wacker Drive |
|
825 Eighth Avenue |
|
Chicago, Illinois 60606 |
|
New York, New York 10019 |
|
(312) 782-0600 |
|
(212) 474-1000 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after this Registration
Statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
| Title of Each Class of |
|
Proposed Maximum |
|
Amount of |
| Securities to Be Registered |
|
Aggregate Offering Price |
|
Registration Fee(1) |
| |
|
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
|
$150,000,000 |
|
$16,050 |
| |
| |
|
|
| (1) |
Calculated pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act
of 1933. |
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission
acting pursuant to said section 8(a), may determine.
The information in this prospectus is
not complete and may be changed. We and the selling stockholders
may not sell these securities until the registration statement
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective.
This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it
is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state
where the offer or sale is not permitted.
|
Shares
CommVault Systems, Inc.
Common Stock
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock. The initial public offering price of our common
stock is expected to be between
$ and
$ per
share. We will apply to list our common stock on The NASDAQ
National Market under the symbol “CVLT.”
We are
selling shares
of common stock and the selling stockholders are
selling shares
of common stock. We will not receive any of the proceeds from
the shares of common stock sold by the selling stockholders.
The underwriters have an option to purchase a maximum
of additional
shares from the selling stockholders to cover over-allotments of
shares.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See “Risk
Factors” on page 11.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Underwriting | |
|
|
|
Proceeds to | |
| |
|
Price to | |
|
Discounts and | |
|
Proceeds to | |
|
Selling | |
| |
|
Public | |
|
Commissions | |
|
CommVault | |
|
Stockholders | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Per Share
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Delivery of the shares of common stock will be made on or
about ,
2006.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
|
|
| Credit Suisse |
Goldman, Sachs & Co. |
Merrill Lynch &
Co.
|
|
| |
Thomas Weisel Partners
LLC |
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2006.
You should rely only on the information contained in this
document or to which we have referred you. We have not
authorized anyone to provide you with information that is
different. This document may only be used where it is legal to
sell these securities. The information in this document may only
be accurate on the date of this document.
Dealer Prospectus Delivery Obligation
Until ,
2006 (25 days after the commencement of this offering), all
dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or
not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This is in addition to the dealer’s obligation
to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter with
respect to unsold allotments or subscriptions.
i
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus. You should read the entire prospectus
carefully, especially the risks of investing in our common stock
discussed under “Risk Factors” and our financial
statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus, before making an investment decision. Unless
otherwise indicated, the terms “CommVault Systems,”
“CommVault,” the “Company,” “we,”
“us” and “our” refer to CommVault Systems,
Inc. and its subsidiaries.
CommVault is a leading provider of data management software
applications and related services. We develop, market and sell a
unified suite of data management software applications under the
QiNetix (pronounced “kinetics”) brand. QiNetix is
specifically designed to protect and manage data throughout its
lifecycle in less time, at lower cost and with fewer resources
than alternative solutions. QiNetix provides our customers with:
|
|
| • |
high-performance data protection, including backup and recovery; |
| |
| • |
disaster recovery of data; |
| |
| • |
data migration and archiving; |
| |
| • |
global availability of data; |
| |
| • |
replication of data; |
| • |
creation and management of copies of stored data; |
| |
| • |
storage resource discovery and usage tracking; |
| |
| • |
data classification; and |
| |
| • |
management and operational reports and troubleshooting tools. |
We also provide our customers with a broad range of highly
effective professional services that are delivered by our
worldwide support and field operations.
QiNetix addresses the markets for backup and recovery,
replication, archival and storage management, offering our
customers
high-performance and
comprehensive solutions for data protection, business
continuance, corporate compliance and centralized management and
reporting.
QiNetix enables our customers to simply and cost-effectively
protect and manage their enterprise data throughout its
lifecycle, from data center to remote office, covering the
leading operating systems, relational databases and
applications. In addition to addressing today’s data
management challenges, our customers can realize lower capital
costs through more efficient use of their enterprise-wide
storage infrastructure assets, including the automated movement
of data from higher cost to lower cost storage devices
throughout its lifecycle and through sharing and better
utilization of storage resources across the enterprise. QiNetix
can also provide our customers with reduced operating costs
through a variety of features, including fast application
deployment, reduced training time, lower cost of storage media
consumables, proactive monitoring and analysis, simplified
troubleshooting and lower administrative costs.
QiNetix is built upon a new innovative architecture and a single
underlying code base, which we refer to as our Common Technology
Engine. This unified architectural design is unique and
differentiates us from our competitors, some of which offer
similar applications built upon disparate software
architectures, which we refer to as point products. We believe
our architectural design provides us with significant
competitive advantages, including offering the industry’s
most granular and automated management of data, tiered
classification of all data based on its user-defined value and
greater product reliability and ease of installation. In
addition, we believe we have lower support and development costs
and faster time to market for our new data management software
applications.
QiNetix fully interoperates with a wide variety of operating
systems, applications, network devices and protocols, storage
arrays, storage formats and tiered storage infrastructures,
providing our customers with the flexibility to purchase and
deploy a combination of hardware and software from different
vendors. As a
1
result, our customers can purchase and use the optimal hardware
and software for their needs, rather than being restricted to
the offerings of a single vendor.
We have established a worldwide multi-channel distribution
network to sell our software and services to large global
enterprises, small and medium sized businesses and government
agencies, both directly through our sales force and indirectly
through our global network of value-added resellers, system
integrators, corporate resellers and original equipment
manufacturers. As of
December 31, 2005, we had licensed our
data management software to more than 3,400 registered customers
across a variety of industries, including Ace Hardware
Corporation, Centex Homes, Clifford Chance LLP, Cozen
O’Connor, Halcrow Group Ltd., Newell Rubbermaid Inc., North
Fork Bank, Ricoh Company, Ltd., the United Kingdom’s
Department of International Development and Welch Foods Inc.
CommVault’s executive management team has led the growth of
our business, including the development and release of all our
QiNetix software since its introduction in February 2000. Under
the guidance of our management team, we have sustained technical
leadership with the introduction of eight new data management
applications and have garnered numerous industry awards and
recognition for our innovative solutions.
Our Industry
The driving forces for the growth of the data management
software industry are the rapid growth of data and the need to
protect and manage that data.
Data is widely considered to be one of an organization’s
most valued assets. The increasing reliance on critical
enterprise software applications such as
e-mail, relational
databases, enterprise resource planning, customer relationship
management and workgroup collaboration tools is resulting in the
rapid growth of data across all enterprises. New government
regulations, such as those issued under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act (HIPAA) and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
(Basel II), as well as company policies requiring data
preservation, are expanding the proportion of data that must be
archived and easily accessible for future use. In addition,
ensuring the security and integrity of data has become a
critical task as regulatory compliance and corporate governance
objectives affecting many organizations mandate the creation of
multiple copies of data with longer and more complex retention
requirements. According to a 2005 report by International Data
Corporation, an independent technology research organization,
worldwide disk storage systems exceeded 1.2 million
terabytes in 2004 and are forecasted to grow to nearly
10.6 million terabytes in 2009, representing an estimated
annual growth rate of approximately 52%.
The recent innovations in storage and networking technologies,
coupled with the rapid growth of data, have caused information
technology managers to redesign their data and storage
infrastructures to deliver greater efficiency, broaden access to
data and reduce costs. The result has been the wide adoption of
larger and more complex networked data and storage solutions,
such as storage area networks (SANs) and network-attached
storage (NAS). In addition to those trends, regulatory
compliance and corporate governance objectives are creating
larger data archives having much longer retention periods that
require information technology managers of organizations
affected by these objectives to ensure the integrity, security
and availability of data.
We believe that these trends are increasing the demand for
software applications that can simplify data management, provide
secure and reliable access to all data across a broad spectrum
of tiered storage and computing systems and seamlessly scale to
accommodate growth, while reducing the total cost of ownership
to the customer. Gartner, Inc., an independent technology
research organization, estimated in 2005 that the storage
management software market will grow from $5.6 billion in
2004 to $9.4 billion in 2009.
Many of our competitors’ products were initially designed
to manage smaller quantities of data in server-attached storage
environments. As a result, we believe they are not as effective
managing data in today’s larger and more complex networked
(SAN and NAS) environments. Given these limitations, we
2
believe our competitors’ products cannot be scaled as
easily as ours and are more costly to implement and manage than
our solutions.
Most data management software solutions are comprised of many
individual point products built upon separate underlying
architectures. This often requires the user to administer each
individual point product using a separate, different user
interface and unique set of dedicated storage resources, such as
disk and tape drives. The result can be a costly, difficult to
manage environment that requires extensive administrative
cross-training, offers little insight into storage resource use
across the global enterprise, provides modest operational
reporting and commands greater storage use. Given these
challenges, we believe that there is and will continue to be
significant demand for a unified, comprehensive and scalable
suite of data management software applications specifically
designed to centrally and cost-effectively manage increasingly
complex enterprise data environments.
Our Strategy
Our objective is to enhance our position as a leading supplier
of data management software and services. Our key strategic
initiatives are to continue:
|
|
|
| |
• |
Extending our Technology Leadership, Product Breadth and
Addressable Markets. We plan to continuously enhance
existing software applications and introduce new data management
software applications that address emerging data and storage
management trends. Specifically, we plan to build upon our
existing technology foundation to introduce new software
applications beyond the traditional data and storage management
category, which may expand our addressable market. |
| |
| |
• |
Enhancing and Expanding our Customer Support and Other
Professional Services Offerings. We plan to continue
creating and delivering innovative services offerings and
product enhancements that result in faster deployment of our
software, simpler system administration and rapid resolution of
problems. |
| |
| |
• |
Expanding Distribution Channels and Geographic Markets
Served. We plan to continue investing in the expansion of
our distribution channels, both geographically and across all
enterprises. |
| |
| |
• |
Broadening and Developing Strategic Relationships. We
plan to broaden our existing relationships and develop new
relationships with leading technology partners, including
software application and infrastructure hardware vendors. We
believe that these types of strategic relationships will allow
us to package and distribute our data management software to our
partners’ customers, increase sales of our software through
joint-selling and marketing arrangements and increase our
insight into future industry trends. |
Company Information
“CommVault Systems,” “CommVault,”
“CommVault Galaxy,” “QiNetix” and other
trademarks or service marks of CommVault appearing in this
prospectus are the property of CommVault. This prospectus also
contains additional trade names, trademarks and service marks of
ours and of other companies. We do not intend our use or display
of other companies’ trade names, trademarks or service
marks to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or
sponsorship of us by, these other companies.
3
Transactions in Connection With the Offering
We intend to effectuate a reverse stock split of our outstanding
shares of common stock at a ratio
of share
for
each share
of common stock outstanding at the time of the reverse stock
split. Except as otherwise indicated, all information in this
prospectus gives effect to the reverse stock split.
In connection with this offering:
|
|
|
| |
• |
We intend to enter into a new $20 million term loan with
Silicon Valley Bank, the expected terms of which are more fully
described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations —
Liquidity and Capital Resources,” pursuant to which we
intend to borrow
$ million
on or immediately prior to the closing date of this offering in
connection with the payments to the holders of our
Series A, B, C, D and E preferred stock described below. |
| |
| |
• |
The outstanding shares of Series A, B, C, D and E preferred
stock will be converted into a total
of shares
of common stock. At the time of conversion, holders of
Series A, B, C, D and E preferred stock will also receive: |
|
|
|
| |
• |
$14.85 per share, or $47.0 million in the aggregate;
and |
| |
| |
• |
accumulated and unpaid dividends of $1.788 per share per
year since the date the shares of preferred stock were issued,
or
$ million
in the aggregate assuming that this offering closes
on ,
2006. |
|
|
| |
We will pay these amounts with the net proceeds of this offering
and the concurrent private placement described below and
borrowings under the new term loan referred to above. |
|
|
|
| |
• |
The outstanding shares of Series AA, BB and CC preferred
stock will be converted into a total
of shares
of common stock. |
| |
| |
• |
We will complete a private placement
of shares
of our common stock at the public offering price to Aman
Ventures, Mark Francis, K. Flynn McDonald, Greg Reyes, Reyes
Family Trust, Van Wagoner Capital Partners, L.P., Van Wagoner
Crossover Fund, L.P. and Marc Weiss, each an existing
stockholder, pursuant to preemptive rights that arise as a
result of the offering and terminate upon the closing of the
offering. Assuming an offering price of
$ per
share (the midpoint of the estimated price range shown on the
cover page of this prospectus) we will raise
$ million
in proceeds from the concurrent private placement. This
prospectus shall not be deemed to be an offer to sell or a
solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in the concurrent
private placement. |
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of
$ per
share would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this
offering and the concurrent private placement by
$ million
and would decrease (increase) the amount of borrowings on the
closing date under our new term loan by
$ million,
assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after
deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
4
The Offering
|
|
|
|
Common stock offered to the public |
|
shares
by us |
| |
|
|
|
shares
by the selling stockholders |
| |
|
Total offering |
|
shares
(or shares
if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full) |
| |
|
Common stock offered in the concurrent private placement |
|
shares |
| |
|
Common stock to be outstanding after the offering and the
concurrent private placement |
|
shares |
| |
|
Proposed NASDAQ National Market symbol |
|
“CVLT” |
| |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We intend to use the estimated net proceeds from the sale of
shares by us in this offering of
$ million
(based on an offering price of
$ per
share, the midpoint of the estimated price range shown on the
cover page of this prospectus), together with the estimated
proceeds
of $ million
from the concurrent private placement (based on an offering
price of
$ per
share, the midpoint of the estimated price range shown on the
cover page of this prospectus) and estimated borrowings of
$ million
under our new term loan, to pay
$ million
in satisfaction of amounts due on our Series A, B, C, D and
E preferred stock upon its conversion into common stock. |
| |
|
|
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of
$ per
share would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this
offering and the concurrent private placement by
$ million
and would decrease (increase) the amount of borrowings on the
closing date under our new term loan by
$ million,
assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after
deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses payable by us. |
| |
|
|
|
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of common stock
by the selling stockholders. |
The number of shares to be outstanding after this offering and
the concurrent private placement is based
on shares
outstanding as
of ,
2006, and excludes:
|
|
|
| |
• |
shares
of common stock available for issuance under our 1996 Stock
Option Plan,
including shares
of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock
options as
of ,
2006 at a weighted average exercise price of
$ per
share; |
| |
| |
• |
shares
of common stock issuable upon exercise of a warrant that expires
on June 19, 2006 held by Dell Ventures, L.P. at an exercise
price of
$ per
share; and |
| |
| |
• |
shares
of common stock initially available for issuance under our 2006
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. |
Except as otherwise indicated, all information in this
prospectus gives effect to the conversion of all shares of our
preferred stock into common stock immediately prior to the
closing of this offering.
5
Summary Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data
The following table sets forth a summary of our historical and
pro forma financial data for the periods ended or as of the
dates indicated. You should read this table together with the
discussion under the headings “Use of Proceeds,”
“Capitalization,” “Selected Financial Data”
and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial
statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
We derived the summary historical financial data for each of the
three years in the period ended
March 31, 2005 from our
audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus. We derived the summary historical financial
data for each of the two years in the period ended
March 31, 2002 from our audited consolidated financial
statements that are not included in this prospectus. We derived
the summary historical financial data for each of the nine
months ended
December 31, 2004 and
2005 and as of
December 31, 2005 from our unaudited consolidated interim
financial statements that are also included elsewhere in this
prospectus. In our opinion, our unaudited consolidated interim
financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as our
audited consolidated financial statements and include all
adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, that
management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the
financial position and results of operations for these periods.
The results of any interim period are not necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for any other interim period
or for the full fiscal year, and the historical results set
forth below do not necessarily indicate results expected for any
future period.
The following table also sets forth summary unaudited pro forma
and pro forma as adjusted consolidated financial data, which
gives effect to the transactions described in the footnotes to
the table. The unaudited pro forma and pro forma as adjusted
consolidated financial data is presented for informational
purposes only and does not purport to represent what our results
of operations or financial position actually would have been had
the transactions reflected occurred on the dates indicated or to
project our financial position as of any future date or our
results of operations for any future period.
6
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine | |
| |
|
|
|
Months Ended | |
| |
|
For the Year Ended March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Software:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
QiNetix
|
|
$ |
8,505 |
|
|
$ |
17,460 |
|
|
$ |
29,485 |
|
|
$ |
39,474 |
|
|
$ |
49,598 |
|
|
$ |
35,317 |
|
|
$ |
47,335 |
|
| |
|
Vault 98
|
|
|
2,484 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Total software
|
|
|
10,989 |
|
|
|
17,774 |
|
|
|
29,485 |
|
|
|
39,474 |
|
|
|
49,598 |
|
|
|
35,317 |
|
|
|
47,335 |
|
| |
Services
|
|
|
11,785 |
|
|
|
11,677 |
|
|
|
14,840 |
|
|
|
21,772 |
|
|
|
33,031 |
|
|
|
23,702 |
|
|
|
33,351 |
|
| |
Hardware, supplies and other
|
|
|
5,240 |
|
|
|
1,397 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
28,014 |
|
|
|
30,848 |
|
|
|
44,419 |
|
|
|
61,246 |
|
|
|
82,629 |
|
|
|
59,019 |
|
|
|
80,686 |
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
QiNetix software
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
1,497 |
|
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
1,316 |
|
| |
Vault 98 software
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Services
|
|
|
6,454 |
|
|
|
6,449 |
|
|
|
6,095 |
|
|
|
8,049 |
|
|
|
9,975 |
|
|
|
7,328 |
|
|
|
9,278 |
|
| |
Hardware, supplies and other
|
|
|
3,385 |
|
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
10,182 |
|
|
|
7,851 |
|
|
|
7,099 |
|
|
|
9,217 |
|
|
|
11,472 |
|
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
|
10,594 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
17,832 |
|
|
|
22,997 |
|
|
|
37,320 |
|
|
|
52,029 |
|
|
|
71,157 |
|
|
|
50,519 |
|
|
|
70,092 |
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
23,375 |
|
|
|
27,352 |
|
|
|
29,842 |
|
|
|
37,592 |
|
|
|
43,248 |
|
|
|
31,475 |
|
|
|
37,185 |
|
| |
Research and development
|
|
|
13,215 |
|
|
|
15,867 |
|
|
|
16,153 |
|
|
|
16,214 |
|
|
|
17,239 |
|
|
|
12,596 |
|
|
|
13,945 |
|
| |
General and administrative
|
|
|
6,261 |
|
|
|
6,291 |
|
|
|
6,332 |
|
|
|
8,599 |
|
|
|
8,955 |
|
|
|
6,739 |
|
|
|
8,895 |
|
| |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,029 |
|
|
|
3,021 |
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
1,390 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
| |
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(28,048 |
) |
|
|
(30,728 |
) |
|
|
(16,759 |
) |
|
|
(11,772 |
) |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
(1,290 |
) |
|
|
8,914 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
Other income
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,430 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
812 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(26,658 |
) |
|
|
(30,119 |
) |
|
|
(16,462 |
) |
|
|
(11,698 |
) |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
(1,084 |
) |
|
|
9,719 |
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(636 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(26,203 |
) |
|
|
(29,887 |
) |
|
|
(16,410 |
) |
|
|
(11,698 |
) |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
(1,148 |
) |
|
|
9,083 |
|
|
Less: accretion of preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(5,652 |
) |
|
|
(5,661 |
) |
|
|
(5,661 |
) |
|
|
(5,676 |
) |
|
|
(5,661 |
) |
|
|
(4,265 |
) |
|
|
(4,265 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
(31,855 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,548 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,071 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,374 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,178 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,413 |
) |
|
$ |
4,818 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic
|
|
$ |
(0.91 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.98 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.47 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.91 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.98 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.47 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing per share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic
|
|
|
35,193 |
|
|
|
36,224 |
|
|
|
36,741 |
|
|
|
37,201 |
|
|
|
37,424 |
|
|
|
37,363 |
|
|
|
37,628 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Diluted
|
|
|
35,193 |
|
|
|
36,224 |
|
|
|
36,741 |
|
|
|
37,201 |
|
|
|
37,424 |
|
|
|
37,363 |
|
|
|
70,412 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma as adjusted net income (loss) attributable to common
stockholders per share(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma as adjusted weighted average shares used in computing
per share amounts(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
As of December 31, 2005 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
Pro | |
|
Pro Forma | |
| |
|
Actual | |
|
Forma(2) | |
|
As Adjusted(3) | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
43,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
21,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
64,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan, less current portion
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative redeemable convertible preferred stock: Series A
through E, at liquidation value
|
|
|
97,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders’ deficit
|
|
|
(75,973 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
Pro forma as adjusted net income (loss) attributable to common
stockholders per share for the year ended March 31, 2005
and the nine months ended December 31, 2005 gives effect to: |
|
|
|
| |
• |
the conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock
into a total
of shares
of common stock upon the closing of this offering; |
| |
| |
• |
the payment of
$ million
in satisfaction of the cash amount due to holders of
Series A, B, C, D and E preferred stock upon its conversion
into common stock (including accrued dividends, and assuming the
offering is completed
on ,
2006) with: |
|
|
|
| |
• |
the net proceeds of this offering and the concurrent private
placement (based on an offering price of
$ per
share, the midpoint of the estimated price range shown on the
cover page of this prospectus); and |
| |
| |
• |
the borrowing of
$ million
under our new term loan at an interest rate equal to 30-day
LIBOR plus %, and
assumed to be % per
year (assuming that this offering and the concurrent private
placement are priced at
$ per
share, the midpoint of the estimated price range shown on the
cover page of this prospectus); |
The following table shows the adjustments to net income (loss)
attributable to common stockholders for the periods shown to
arrive at the corresponding pro forma as adjusted net income
(loss) attributable to common stockholders:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
| |
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2005 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
(5,178 |
) |
|
$ |
4,818 |
|
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Elimination of accretion of preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
5,661 |
|
|
|
4,265 |
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Interest expense associated with term loan borrowings, net of
income taxes of $
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma as adjusted net income (loss) attributable to common
stockholders
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of
$ per
share would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this
offering and the concurrent private placement by
$ million,
would decrease (increase) the amount of borrowings on the
closing date under our new term loan by
$ million,
would increase (decrease) the pro forma as adjusted net income
(loss) attributable to common stockholders by
$ million
and
$ million
in the year ended
March 31, 2005 and in the nine months
ended
December 31, 2005, respectively, and would increase
(decrease) the
8
pro forma as adjusted net income (loss) attributable to
common stockholders per share by
$ and
$ in
the year ended
March 31, 2005 and in the nine months ended
December 31, 2005, respectively, assuming the number of
shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the estimated
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us.
A 0.125% increase (decrease) in assumed interest rate on
$ million of borrowings under our new term loan would
increase (decrease) interest expense by
$ million
and
$ million
in the year ended
March 31, 2005 and in the nine months
ended
December 31, 2005, respectively, would decrease
(increase) pro forma as adjusted net income (loss) attributable
to common stockholders by
$ million
and
$ million
in the year ended
March 31, 2005 and in the nine months
ended
December 31, 2005, respectively, and would decrease
(increase) pro forma as adjusted net income (loss)
attributable to common stockholders per share by
$ and
$ ,
in the year ended
March 31, 2005 and in the nine months
ended
December 31, 2005, respectively.
The following tables show the adjustments to the basic and
diluted weighted average number of shares used in computing
pro forma as adjusted per share amounts:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
| |
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2005 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Basic weighted average number of shares used in computing per
share amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Shares issued upon conversion of outstanding preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Shares issued in this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Shares issued in the concurrent private placement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic pro forma as adjusted weighted average number of shares
used in computing per share amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
| |
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2005 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares used in computing per
share amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Shares issued upon conversion of outstanding preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Shares issued in this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Shares issued in the concurrent private placement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted pro forma as adjusted weighted average number of shares
used in computing per share amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
• |
the conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock
into a total
of shares
of common stock; |
| |
| |
• |
the payment of
$ million
in satisfaction of the cash amount due to holders of our
Series A, B, C, D and E preferred stock upon its conversion
into common stock (including accrued dividends, and assuming the
offering is completed
on ,
2006); |
9
|
|
|
| |
• |
the borrowing of
$ million
under our new term loan on or immediately prior to the closing
date of this offering in connection with the payments to the
holders of our Series A, B, C, D and E preferred
stock; and |
| |
| |
• |
the completion of the concurrent private placement
of shares
of our common stock at the public offering price and the
application of the proceeds therefrom. Assuming an offering
price of
$ per
share (the midpoint of the estimated price range shown on the
cover page of this prospectus) we will raise
$ million
in proceeds from the concurrent private placement. |
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of
$ per
share would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this
offering and the concurrent private placement by
$ million
and would decrease (increase) the amount of borrowings on the
closing date under our new term loan by
$ million,
assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after
deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
(3) The pro forma as adjusted balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2005 reflects the issuance
of shares
of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial offering
price of
$ per
share (the midpoint of the estimated price range shown on the
cover page of this prospectus), and our receipt of the net
proceeds from this offering, after deducting the underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses
payable by us, as if these events had occurred at
December 31, 2005.
10
RISK FACTORS
This offering involves a high degree of risk. You should
carefully consider the following risk factors in addition to the
other information contained in this prospectus before purchasing
our common stock.
Risks Related to Our Business
We have only recently become profitable and we may be
unable to sustain future profitability.
We have only recently become profitable, generating net income
of approximately $0.5 million for the year ended
March 31, 2005 and net income of approximately
$9.1 million for the nine months ended
December 31,
2005. As of
December 31, 2005, we had an accumulated
deficit of approximately $170.1 million. We may be unable
to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual
basis in the future. We intend to continue to expend significant
funds in developing our software and service offerings and for
general corporate purposes, including marketing, services and
sales operations, hiring additional personnel, upgrading our
infrastructure and expanding into new geographical markets. We
expect that associated expenses will precede any revenues
generated by the increased spending. If we experience a downturn
in business, we may incur losses and negative cash flow from
operations, which could materially adversely affect our results
of operations and capitalization.
Our industry is intensely competitive, and most of our
competitors have greater financial, technical and sales and
marketing resources and larger installed customer bases than we
do, which could enable them to compete more effectively than we
do.
The data management software market is intensely competitive,
highly fragmented and characterized by rapidly changing
technology and evolving standards. Competitors vary in size and
in the scope and breadth of the products and services offered.
Our primary competitors include CA, Inc. (formerly known as
Computer Associates International, Inc.), EMC Corporation,
Hewlett-Packard Company, International Business Machines
Corporation (IBM) and Symantec Corporation.
The principal competitive factors in our industry include
product functionality, product integration, platform coverage,
ability to scale, price, worldwide sales infrastructure, global
technical support, name recognition and reputation. The ability
of major system vendors to bundle hardware and software
solutions is also a significant competitive factor in our
industry.
Many of our current and potential competitors have longer
operating histories and have substantially greater financial,
technical, sales, marketing and other resources than we do, as
well as larger installed customer bases, greater name
recognition and broader product offerings, including hardware.
These competitors can devote greater resources to the
development, promotion, sale and support of their products than
we can and have the ability to bundle their hardware and
software products in a combined offering. As a result, these
competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or
emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements.
It is also costly and time-consuming to change data management
systems. Most of our new customers have installed data
management software, which gives an incumbent competitor an
advantage in retaining a customer because it already understands
the network infrastructure, user demands and information
technology needs of the customer, and also because some
customers are reluctant to change vendors.
Our current and potential competitors may establish cooperative
relationships among themselves or with third parties. If so, new
competitors or alliances that include our competitors may emerge
that could acquire significant market share. In addition, large
operating system and application vendors, such as Microsoft
Corporation, have introduced products or functionality that
include some of the same functions offered by our software
applications. In the future, further development by these
vendors could cause our software applications and services to
become redundant, which could seriously harm our sales, results
of operations and financial condition.
11
New competitors entering our markets can have a negative impact
on our competitive positioning. In addition, we expect to
encounter new competitors as we enter new markets. Furthermore,
many of our existing competitors are broadening their operating
systems platform coverage. We also expect increased competition
from original equipment manufacturers, including those we
partner with, and from systems and network management companies,
especially those that have historically focused on the mainframe
computer market and have been making acquisitions and broadening
their efforts to include data management and storage products.
We expect that competition will increase as a result of future
software industry consolidation. Increased competition could
harm our business by causing, among other things, price
reductions of our products, reduced profitability and loss of
market share.
We may experience a decline in revenues or volatility in
our operating results, which may adversely affect the market
price of our common stock.
We cannot predict our future revenues or operating results with
certainty because of many factors outside of our control. A
significant revenue or profit decline, lowered forecasts or
volatility in our operating results could cause the market price
of our common stock to decline substantially. Factors that could
affect our revenues and operating results include the following:
|
|
|
| |
• |
the unpredictability of the timing and magnitude of orders for
our software applications — during the year ended
March 31, 2005 and the nine months ended December 31,
2005, a majority of our quarterly revenues was earned and
recorded near the end of each quarter; |
| |
| |
• |
the possibility that our customers may cancel, defer or limit
purchases as a result of reduced information technology budgets; |
| |
| |
• |
the possibility that our customers may defer purchases of our
software applications in anticipation of new software
applications or updates from us or our competitors; |
| |
| |
• |
the ability of our original equipment manufacturers and
resellers to meet their sales objectives; |
| |
| |
• |
market acceptance of our new applications and enhancements; |
| |
| |
• |
our ability to control expenses; |
| |
| |
• |
changes in our pricing and distribution terms or those of our
competitors; |
| |
| |
• |
the demands on our management, sales force and services
infrastructure as a result of the introduction of new software
applications or updates; and |
| |
| |
• |
the possibility that our business will be adversely affected as
a result of the threat of terrorism or military actions taken by
the United States or its allies. |
Our expense levels are relatively fixed and are based, in part,
on our expectations of our future revenues. If revenue levels
fall below our expectations and we are profitable at the time,
our net income would decrease because only a small portion of
our expenses varies with our revenues. If we are not profitable
at the time, our net loss would increase. Therefore, any
significant decline in revenues for any period could have an
immediate adverse impact on our results of operations for that
period. We believe that
period-to-period
comparisons of our results of operations should not be relied
upon as an indication of future performance. In addition, our
results of operations could be below expectations of public
market analysts and investors in future periods, which would
likely cause the market price of our common stock to decline.
We anticipate that an increasing portion of our revenues
will depend on our arrangements with original equipment
manufacturers that have no obligation to sell our software
applications, and the termination or expiration of these
arrangements or the failure of original equipment manufacturers
to sell our software applications would have a material adverse
effect on our future revenues and results of operations.
We have original equipment manufacturer agreements with Dell and
Hitachi Data Systems and a reseller agreement with Dell. These
original equipment manufacturers sell our software applications
and in
12
some cases incorporate our data management software into systems
that they sell. A material portion of our revenues is generated
through these arrangements, and we expect this contribution to
grow as a percentage of our total revenues in the future.
However, we have no control over the shipping dates or volumes
of systems these original equipment manufacturers ship and they
have no obligation to ship systems incorporating our software
applications. They also have no obligation to recommend or offer
our software applications exclusively or at all, and they have
no minimum sales requirements and can terminate our relationship
at any time. These original equipment manufacturers also could
choose to develop their own data management software internally
and incorporate those products into their systems instead of our
software applications. The original equipment manufacturers that
we do business with also compete with one another. If one of our
original equipment manufacturer partners views our arrangement
with another original equipment manufacturer as competing with
its products, it may decide to stop doing business with us. Any
material decrease in the volume of sales generated by original
equipment manufacturers we do business with, as a result of
these factors or otherwise, would have a material adverse effect
on our revenues and results of operations in future periods.
Sales through our original equipment manufacturer agreement and
our reseller agreement with Dell accounted for approximately 7%
and 11%, respectively, of revenues for the nine months ended
December 31, 2005, and a total of approximately 17% of our
accounts receivable balance as of
December 31, 2005. If we
were to see a decline in our sales through Dell and/or an
impairment of our receivable balance from Dell, it could have a
significant adverse effect on our results of operations.
The loss of key personnel or the failure to attract and
retain highly qualified personnel could have an adverse effect
on our business.
Our future performance depends on the continued service of our
key technical, sales, services and management personnel. We rely
on our executive officers and senior management to execute our
existing business operations and identify and pursue new growth
opportunities. The loss of key employees could result in
significant disruptions to our business, and the integration of
replacement personnel could be time consuming, cause additional
disruptions to our business and be unsuccessful. We do not carry
key person life insurance covering any of our employees.
Our future success also depends on our continued ability to
attract and retain highly qualified technical, sales, services
and management personnel. Competition for such personnel is
intense, and we may fail to retain our key technical, sales,
services and management employees or attract or retain other
highly qualified technical, sales, services and management
personnel in the future. Conversely, if we fail to manage
employee performance or reduce staffing levels when required by
market conditions, our personnel costs would be excessive and
our business and profitability could be adversely affected.
Our ability to sell our software applications is highly
dependent on the quality of our services offerings, and our
failure to offer high quality support and professional services
would have a material adverse affect on our sales of software
applications and results of operations.
Our services include the assessment and design of solutions to
meet our customers’ storage management requirements and the
efficient installation and deployment of our software
applications based on specified business objectives. Further,
once our software applications are deployed, our customers
depend on us to resolve issues relating to our software
applications. A high level of service is critical for the
successful marketing and sale of our software. If we or our
partners do not effectively install or deploy our applications,
or succeed in helping our customers quickly resolve
post-deployment issues, it would adversely affect our ability to
sell software products to existing customers and could harm our
reputation with potential customers. As a result, our failure to
maintain high quality support and professional services would
have a material adverse effect on our sales of software
applications and results of operations.
13
We rely on indirect sales channels, such as value-added
resellers, systems integrators and corporate resellers, for the
distribution of our software applications, and the failure of
these channels to effectively sell our software applications
could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and results
of operations.
We rely significantly on our value-added resellers, systems
integrators and corporate resellers, which we collectively refer
to as resellers, for the marketing and distribution of our
software applications and services. Resellers are our most
significant distribution channel. However, our agreements with
resellers are generally not exclusive, are generally renewable
annually and in many cases may be terminated by either party
without cause. Many of our resellers carry software applications
that are competitive with ours. These resellers may give a
higher priority to other software applications, including those
of our competitors, or may not continue to carry our software
applications at all. If a number of resellers were to
discontinue or reduce the sales of our products, or were to
promote our competitors’ products in lieu of our
applications, it would have a material adverse effect on our
future revenues. Events or occurrences of this nature could
seriously harm our sales and results of operations. In addition,
we expect that a significant portion of our sales growth will
depend upon our ability to identify and attract new reseller
partners. The use of resellers is an integral part of our
distribution network. We believe that our competitors also use
reseller arrangements. Our competitors may be more successful in
attracting reseller partners and could enter into exclusive
relationships with resellers that make it difficult to expand
our reseller network. Any failure on our part to expand our
network of resellers could impair our ability to grow revenues
in the future.
Some of our resellers possess significant resources and advanced
technical abilities. These resellers, particularly our corporate
resellers, may, either independently or jointly with our
competitors, develop and market software applications and
related services that compete with our offerings. If this were
to occur, these resellers might discontinue marketing and
distributing our software applications and services. In
addition, these resellers would have an advantage over us when
marketing their competing software applications and related
services because of their existing customer relationships. The
occurrence of any of these events could have a material adverse
effect on our revenues and results of operations.
Sales of only a few of our software applications make up a
substantial portion of our revenues, and a decline in demand for
any one of these software applications could have a material
adverse effect on our sales, profitability and financial
condition.
In the year ended
March 31, 2005 and the nine months ended
December 31, 2005, we derived substantially all of our
license revenue from only a few of our software applications and
substantially all of our services revenue from associated
customer and technical support. As a result, we are particularly
vulnerable to fluctuations in demand for these software
applications, whether as a result of competition, product
obsolescence, technological change, budgetary constraints of our
customers or other factors. If demand for any of these software
applications declines significantly, our sales, profitability
and financial condition would be adversely affected.
Our software applications are complex and contain
undetected errors, which could adversely affect not only our
software applications’ performance but also our reputation
and the acceptance of our software applications in the
market.
Software applications as complex as those we offer contain
undetected errors or failures. Despite extensive testing by us
and by our customers, we have in the past discovered errors in
our software applications and will do so in the future. As a
result of past discovered errors, we experienced delays and lost
revenues while we corrected those software applications. In
addition, customers in the past have brought to our attention
“bugs” in our software created by the customers’
unique operating environments. Although we have been able to fix
these software bugs in the past, we may not always be able to do
so. Our software products may also be subject to intentional
attacks by viruses that seek to take advantage of these bugs,
errors or other weaknesses. Any of these events may result in
the loss of, or delay in, market
14
acceptance of our software applications and services, which
would seriously harm our sales, results of operations and
financial condition.
Furthermore, we believe that our reputation and name recognition
are critical factors in our ability to compete and generate
additional sales. Promotion and enhancement of our name will
depend largely on our success in continuing to provide effective
software applications and services. The occurrence of errors in
our software applications or the detection of bugs by our
customers may damage our reputation in the market and our
relationships with our existing customers and, as a result, we
may be unable to attract or retain customers.
In addition, because our software applications are used to
manage data that is often critical to our customers, the
licensing and support of our software applications involve the
risk of product liability claims. Any product liability
insurance we carry may not be sufficient to cover our losses
resulting from product liability claims. The successful
assertion of one or more large claims against us could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition.
We may not receive significant revenues from our current
research and development efforts for several years, if at
all.
Developing software is expensive, and the investment in product
development may involve a long payback cycle. In fiscal 2004 and
fiscal 2005, our research and development expenses were
$16.2 million, or approximately 26% of our total revenues,
and $17.2 million, or approximately 21% of our total
revenues, respectively. For the nine months ended
December 31, 2005, our research and development expenses
were $13.9 million, or approximately 17% of our total
revenues over that period. Our future plans include significant
investments in software research and development and related
product opportunities. We believe that we must continue to
dedicate a significant amount of resources to our research and
development efforts to maintain our competitive position.
However, we do not expect to receive significant revenues from
these investments for several years, if at all.
We encounter long sales and implementation cycles,
particularly for our larger customers, which could have an
adverse effect on the size, timing and predictability of our
revenues.
Potential or existing customers, particularly larger enterprise
customers, generally commit significant resources to an
evaluation of available software and require us to expend
substantial time, effort and money educating them as to the
value of our software and services. Sales of our core software
products to these larger customers often require an extensive
education and marketing effort.
We could expend significant funds and resources during a sales
cycle and ultimately fail to close the sale. Our sales cycle for
all of our products and services is subject to significant risks
and delays over which we have little or no control, including:
|
|
|
| |
• |
our customers’ budgetary constraints; |
| |
| |
• |
the timing of our customers’ budget cycles and approval
processes; |
| |
| |
• |
our customers’ willingness to replace their current
software solutions; |
| |
| |
• |
our need to educate potential customers about the uses and
benefits of our products and services; and |
| |
| |
• |
the timing of the expiration of our customers’ current
license agreements or outsourcing agreements for similar
services. |
If we are unsuccessful in closing sales, it could have a
material adverse effect on the size, timing and predictability
of our revenues.
15
If we are unable to manage our growth, there could be a
material adverse effect on our business, the quality of our
products and services and our ability to retain key
personnel.
We have experienced a period of significant growth in recent
years. Our revenues increased 37% for the nine months ended
December 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, and
the number of our customers increased significantly during that
period. Our growth has placed increased demands on our
management and other resources and will continue to do so in the
future. We may not be able to maintain or accelerate our current
growth rate, manage our expanding operations effectively or
achieve planned growth on a timely or profitable basis. Managing
our growth effectively will involve, among other things:
|
|
|
| |
• |
continuing to retain, motivate and manage our existing employees
and attract and integrate new employees; |
| |
| |
• |
continuing to provide a high level of services to an increasing
number of customers; |
| |
| |
• |
maintaining the quality of product and services offerings while
controlling our expenses; |
| |
| |
• |
developing new sales channels that broaden the distribution of
our software applications and services; and |
| |
| |
• |
developing, implementing and improving our operational,
financial, accounting and other internal systems and controls on
a timely basis. |
If we are unable to manage our growth effectively, there could
be a material adverse effect on our ability to maintain or
increase revenues and profitability, the quality of our data
management software, the quality of our services offerings and
our ability to retain key personnel. These factors could
adversely affect our reputation in the market and our ability to
generate future sales from new or existing customers.
We depend on growth in the data management software
market, and lack of growth or contraction in this market or a
general downturn in economic and market conditions could have a
material adverse effect on our sales and financial
condition.
Demand for data management software is linked to growth in the
amount of data generated and stored, demand for data retention
and management (whether as a result of regulatory requirements
or otherwise) and demand for and adoption of new storage devices
and networking technologies. Because our software applications
are concentrated within the data management software market, if
the demand for storage devices, storage software applications,
storage capacity or storage networking devices declines, our
sales, profitability and financial condition would be materially
adversely affected. Segments of the computer and software
industry have in the past experienced significant economic
downturns. The occurrence of any of these factors in the data
management software market could materially adversely affect our
sales, profitability and financial condition.
Furthermore, the data management software market is dynamic and
evolving. Our future financial performance will depend in large
part on continued growth in the number of organizations adopting
data management software for their computing environments. The
market for data management software may not continue to grow at
historic rates, or at all. If this market fails to grow or grows
more slowly than we currently anticipate, our sales and
profitability could be adversely affected.
Our services revenue produces lower gross margins than our
license revenue, and an increase in services revenue relative to
license revenue would harm our overall gross margins.
Our services revenue, which includes fees for customer support,
assessment and design consulting, implementation and
post-deployment services and training, was approximately 36% of
our total revenues for fiscal 2004, 40% of our total revenues
for fiscal 2005 and 41% of our total revenues for the nine
months ended
December 31, 2005. Our services revenue has
lower gross margins than our license revenue. An increase in the
percentage of total revenues represented by services revenue
would adversely affect our overall gross margins.
16
The volume and profitability of services can depend in large
part upon:
|
|
|
| |
• |
competitive pricing pressure on the rates that we can charge for
our services; |
| |
| |
• |
the complexity of our customers’ information technology
environments and the existence of multiple non-integrated legacy
databases; |
| |
| |
• |
the resources directed by our customers to their implementation
projects; and |
| |
| |
• |
the extent to which outside consulting organizations provide
services directly to customers. |
Any erosion of our margins for our services revenue or any
adverse change in the mix of our license versus services revenue
would adversely affect our operating results.
Our international sales and operations are subject to
factors that could have an adverse effect on our results of
operations.
We have significant sales and services operations outside the
United States, and derive a substantial portion of our revenues
from these operations. We also plan to expand our international
operations. In the nine months ended
December 31, 2005, we
derived approximately 28% of our revenues from sales outside the
United States.
Our international operations are subject to risks related to the
differing legal, political, social and regulatory requirements
and economic conditions of many countries, including:
|
|
|
| |
• |
difficulties in staffing and managing our international
operations; |
| |
| |
• |
foreign countries may impose additional withholding taxes or
otherwise tax our foreign income, impose tariffs or adopt other
restrictions on foreign trade or investment, including currency
exchange controls; |
| |
| |
• |
general economic conditions in the countries in which we
operate, including seasonal reductions in business activity in
the summer months in Europe and in other periods in other
countries, could have an adverse effect on our earnings from
operations in those countries; |
| |
| |
• |
imposition of, or unexpected adverse changes in, foreign laws or
regulatory requirements may occur, including those pertaining to
export duties and quotas, trade and employment restrictions; |
| |
| |
• |
longer payment cycles for sales in foreign countries and
difficulties in collecting accounts receivable; |
| |
| |
• |
competition from local suppliers; |
| |
| |
• |
costs and delays associated with developing software in multiple
languages; and |
| |
| |
• |
political unrest, war or acts of terrorism. |
Our business in emerging markets requires us to respond to rapid
changes in market conditions in those markets. Our overall
success in international markets depends, in part, upon our
ability to succeed in differing legal, regulatory, economic,
social and political conditions. We may not continue to succeed
in developing and implementing policies and strategies that will
be effective in each location where we do business. Furthermore,
the occurrence of any of the foregoing factors may have a
material adverse effect on our business and results of
operations.
We are exposed to domestic and foreign currency
fluctuations that could harm our reported revenues and results
of operations.
Our international sales are generally denominated in foreign
currencies, and this revenue could be materially affected by
currency fluctuations. Approximately 28% of our sales were
outside the United States in the nine months ended
December 31, 2005. Our primary exposures are to
fluctuations in exchange rates for the U.S. dollar versus
the Euro and, to a lesser extent, the Australian dollar, British
pound sterling, Canadian dollar and Chinese yuan. Changes in
currency exchange rates could adversely
17
affect our reported revenues and could require us to reduce our
prices to remain competitive in foreign markets, which could
also have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations. We have not historically hedged our exposure to
changes in foreign currency exchange rates and, as a result, we
could incur unanticipated gains or losses.
We are currently unable to accurately predict what our
short-term and long-term effective tax rates will be in the
future.
We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and the
various foreign jurisdictions in which we operate. Significant
judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for
income taxes and, in the ordinary course of business, there are
many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax
determination is uncertain. Our effective tax rates could be
adversely affected by changes in the mix of earnings in
countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the
valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities or changes in
tax laws, as well as other factors. Our judgments may be subject
to audits or reviews by local tax authorities in each of these
jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our income tax
provisions. Furthermore, we have had limited historical
profitability upon which to base our estimate of future
short-term and long-term effective tax rates.
We develop software applications that interoperate with
operating systems and hardware developed by others, and if the
developers of those operating systems and hardware do not
cooperate with us or we are unable to devote the necessary
resources so that our applications interoperate with those
systems, our software development efforts may be delayed or
foreclosed and our business and results of operations may be
adversely affected.
Our software applications operate primarily on the Windows,
UNIX, Linux and Novell Netware operating systems and the
hardware devices of numerous manufacturers. When new or updated
versions of these operating systems and hardware devices are
introduced, it is often necessary for us to develop updated
versions of our software applications so that they interoperate
properly with these systems and devices. We may not accomplish
these development efforts quickly or cost-effectively, and it is
not clear what the relative growth rates of these operating
systems and hardware will be. These development efforts require
substantial capital investment, the devotion of substantial
employee resources and the cooperation of the developers of the
operating systems and hardware. For some operating systems, we
must obtain some proprietary application program interfaces from
the owner in order to develop software applications that
interoperate with the operating system. Operating system owners
have no obligation to assist in these development efforts. If
they do not provide us with assistance or the necessary
proprietary application program interfaces on a timely basis, we
may experience delays or be unable to expand our software
applications into other areas.
Our ability to sell to the U.S. federal government is
subject to uncertainties which could have a material adverse
effect on our sales and results of operations.
Our ability to sell software applications and services to the
U.S. federal government is subject to uncertainties related
to the government’s future funding commitments and our
ability to maintain certain security clearances complying with
the Department of Defense and other agency requirements. For the
nine months ended
December 31, 2005, approximately 10% of
our revenues were derived from sales where the U.S. federal
government was the end user. The future prospects for our
business are also sensitive to changes in government policies
and funding priorities. Changes in government policies or
priorities, including funding levels through agency or program
budget reductions by the U.S. Congress or government
agencies, could materially adversely affect our ability to sell
our software applications to the U.S. federal government,
causing our business prospects to suffer.
In addition, our U.S. federal government sales require our
employees to maintain various levels of security clearances.
Obtaining and maintaining security clearances for employees
involves a lengthy process, and it is difficult to identify,
retain and recruit qualified employees who already hold security
clearances. To the extent that we are not able to obtain
security clearances or engage employees with
18
security clearances, we may not be able to effectively sell our
software applications and services to the U.S. federal
government, which would have an adverse effect on our sales and
results of operations.
Protection of our intellectual property is limited, and
any misuse of our intellectual property by others could
materially adversely affect our sales and results of
operations.
Our success depends significantly upon proprietary technology in
our software, documentation and other written materials. To
protect our proprietary rights, we rely on a combination of:
|
|
|
| |
• |
patents; |
| |
| |
• |
copyright and trademark laws; |
| |
| |
• |
trade secrets; |
| |
| |
• |
confidentiality procedures; and |
| |
| |
• |
contractual provisions. |
These methods afford only limited protection. Despite this
limited protection, any issued patent may not provide us with
any competitive advantages or may be challenged by third
parties, and the patents of others may seriously impede our
ability to conduct our business. Further, our pending patent
applications may not result in the issuance of patents, and any
patents issued to us may not be timely or broad enough to
protect our proprietary rights. We may also develop proprietary
products or technologies that cannot be protected under patent
law.
Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights,
unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our software
applications or to obtain and use information that we regard as
proprietary. Policing unauthorized use of our software
applications is difficult, and we expect software piracy to
continue to be a persistent problem. In licensing our software
applications, we typically rely on “shrink wrap”
licenses that are not signed by licensees. We also rely on
“click wrap” licenses which are downloaded over the
internet. We may have difficulty enforcing these licenses in
some jurisdictions. In addition, the laws of some foreign
countries do not protect our proprietary rights to as great an
extent as do the laws of the United States. Our attempts to
protect our proprietary rights may not be adequate. Our
competitors may independently develop similar technology,
duplicate our software applications or design around patents
issued to us or other intellectual property rights of ours.
Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our
intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets or
determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of
others. Litigation could result in substantial costs and
diversion of resources and management attention. In addition,
from time to time we are participants or members of various
industry standard-setting organizations or other industry
technical organizations. Our participation or membership in such
organizations may, in some circumstances, require us to enter
into royalty or licensing agreements with third parties
regarding our intellectual property under terms established by
those organizations which we may not find favorable.
Additionally, the loss of key personnel involved with
developing, managing or maintaining our intellectual property
could have an adverse effect on our business.
Claims that we misuse the intellectual property of others
could subject us to significant liability and disrupt our
business, which could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition.
Because of the nature of our business, we may become subject to
material claims of infringement by competitors and other third
parties with respect to current or future software applications,
trademarks or other proprietary rights. We expect that software
developers will increasingly be subject to infringement claims
as the number of software applications and competitors in our
industry segment grows and the functionality of software
applications in different industry segments overlaps. Any such
claims, whether meritorious or not, could be time-consuming,
result in costly litigation, cause shipment delays or require us
to enter into royalty or licensing agreements with third
parties, which may not be available on terms that
19
we deem acceptable, if at all. Any of these claims could disrupt
our business and have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations and financial condition.
We may not be able to respond to rapid technological
changes with new software applications and services offerings,
which could have a material adverse effect on our sales and
profitability.
The markets for our software applications are characterized by
rapid technological changes, changing customer needs, frequent
new software product introductions and evolving industry
standards. The introduction of software applications embodying
new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards
could make our existing and future software applications
obsolete and unmarketable. As a result, we may not be able to
accurately predict the lifecycle of our software applications,
and they may become obsolete before we receive the amount of
revenues that we anticipate from them. If any of the foregoing
events were to occur, our ability to retain or increase market
share in the data management software market could be materially
adversely affected.
To be successful, we need to anticipate, develop and introduce
new software applications and services on a timely and
cost-effective basis that keep pace with technological
developments and emerging industry standards and that address
the increasingly sophisticated needs of our customers. We may
fail to develop and market software applications and services
that respond to technological changes or evolving industry
standards, experience difficulties that could delay or prevent
the successful development, introduction and marketing of these
applications and services or fail to develop applications and
services that adequately meet the requirements of the
marketplace or achieve market acceptance. Our failure to develop
and market such applications and services on a timely basis, or
at all, could have a material adverse effect on our sales and
profitability.
We cannot predict our future capital needs and we may be
unable to obtain additional financing to fund acquisitions,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
We may need to raise additional funds in the future in order to
acquire complementary businesses, technologies, products or
services. Any required additional financing may not be available
on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If we raise additional
funds by issuing equity securities, you may experience
significant dilution of your ownership interest, and the
newly-issued securities may have rights senior to those of the
holders of our common stock. If we raise additional funds by
obtaining loans from third parties, the terms of those financing
arrangements may include negative covenants or other
restrictions on our business that could impair our operational
flexibility, and would also require us to fund additional
interest expense. If additional financing is not available when
required or is not available on acceptable terms, we may be
unable to successfully develop or enhance our software and
services through acquisitions in order to take advantage of
business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures,
which could have a material adverse effect on our software and
services offerings, revenues, results of operations and
financial condition.
Acquisitions involve risks that could adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
We may pursue acquisitions of businesses, technologies, products
or services that we believe complement or expand our existing
business. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including:
|
|
|
| |
• |
diversion of management’s attention during the acquisition
and integration process; |
| |
| |
• |
costs, delays and difficulties of integrating the acquired
company’s operations, technologies and personnel into our
existing operations and organization; |
| |
| |
• |
adverse impact on earnings as a result of amortizing the
acquired company’s intangible assets or impairment charges
related to write-downs of goodwill related to acquisitions; |
| |
| |
• |
issuances of equity securities to pay for acquisitions, which
may be dilutive to existing stockholders; |
20
|
|
|
| |
• |
potential loss of customers or key employees of acquired
companies; |
| |
| |
• |
impact on our financial condition due to the timing of the
acquisition or our failure to meet operating expectations for
acquired businesses; and |
| |
| |
• |
assumption of unknown liabilities of the acquired company. |
Any acquisitions of businesses, technologies, products or
services may not generate sufficient revenues to offset the
associated costs of the acquisitions or may result in other
adverse effects.
Our use of “open source” software could
negatively affect our business and subjects us to possible
litigation.
Some of the products or technologies acquired, licensed or
developed by us may incorporate so-called “open
source” software, and we may incorporate open source
software into other products in the future. Such open source
software is generally licensed by its authors or other third
parties under open source licenses, including, for example, the
GNU General Public License, the GNU Lesser General Public
License, the Common Public License, “Apache-style”
licenses, “Berkley Software Distribution or BSD-style”
licenses and other open source licenses. We monitor our use of
open source software to avoid subjecting our products to
conditions we do not intend. Although we believe that we have
complied with our obligations under the various applicable
licenses for open source software that we use, there is little
or no legal precedent governing the interpretation of many of
the terms of certain of these licenses, and therefore the
potential impact of these terms on our business is somewhat
unknown and may result in unanticipated obligations regarding
our products and technologies. The use of such open source
software may ultimately subject some of our products to
unintended conditions which may negatively affect our business,
financial condition, operating results, cash flow and ability to
commercialize our products or technologies.
Some of these open source licenses may subject us to certain
conditions, including requirements that we offer our products
that use the open source software for no cost, that we make
available source code for modifications or derivative works we
create based upon, incorporating or using the open source
software and/or that we license such modifications or derivative
works under the terms of the particular open source license. If
an author or other third party that distributes such open source
software were to allege that we had not complied with the
conditions of one or more of these licenses, we could be
required to incur significant legal expenses defending against
such allegations. If our defenses were not successful, we could
be enjoined from the distribution of our products that contained
the open source software and required to make the source code
for the open source software available to others, to grant third
parties certain rights of further use of our software or to
remove the open source software from our products, which could
disrupt the distribution and sale of some of our products. In
addition, if we combine our proprietary software with open
source software in a certain manner, under some open source
licenses we could be required to release the source code of our
proprietary software. If an author or other third party that
distributes open source software were to obtain a judgment
against us based on allegations that we had not complied with
the terms of any such open source licenses, we could also be
subject to liability for copyright infringement damages and
breach of
contract for our past distribution of such open source
software.
Risks Relating to the Offering
An active market for our common stock may not develop,
which may inhibit the ability of our stockholders to sell common
stock following this offering.
An active or liquid trading market in our common stock may not
develop upon completion of this offering, or if it does develop,
it may not continue. If an active trading market does not
develop, you may have difficulty selling any of our common stock
that you buy. The initial public offering price of our common
stock has been determined through our negotiations with the
underwriters and may be higher
21
than the market price of our common stock after this offering.
Consequently, you may not be able to sell shares of our common
stock at prices equal to or greater than the price paid by you
in the offering. See “Underwriting” for a discussion
of the factors that we and the underwriters will consider in
determining the initial public offering price.
The price of our common stock may be highly volatile and
may decline regardless of our operating performance.
The market price of our common stock could be subject to
significant fluctuations in response to:
|
|
|
| |
• |
variations in our quarterly or annual operating results; |
| |
| |
• |
changes in financial estimates, treatment of our tax assets or
liabilities or investment recommendations by securities analysts
following our business; |
| |
| |
• |
the public’s response to our press releases, our other
public announcements and our filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission; |
| |
| |
• |
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance or
interpretations or principles; |
| |
| |
• |
sales of common stock by our directors, officers and significant
stockholders; |
| |
| |
• |
announcements of technological innovations or enhanced or new
products by us or our competitors; |
| |
| |
• |
our failure to achieve operating results consistent with
securities analysts’ projections; |
| |
| |
• |
the operating and stock price performance of other companies
that investors may deem comparable to us; |
| |
| |
• |
broad market and industry factors; and |
| |
| |
• |
other events or factors, including those resulting from war,
incidents of terrorism or responses to such events. |
The market prices of software companies have been extremely
volatile. Stock prices of many software companies have often
fluctuated in a manner unrelated or disproportionate to the
operating performance of such companies. In the past, following
periods of market volatility, stockholders have often instituted
securities class action litigation. If we were involved in
securities litigation, it could have a substantial cost and
divert resources and the attention of management from our
business.
You will experience an immediate and substantial dilution
in the net tangible book value of the common shares you purchase
in this offering.
The initial public offering price is substantially higher than
the pro forma net tangible book value per share of our
outstanding common stock. As a result, investors purchasing
common stock in this offering will incur immediate dilution of
$ per
share (based on an offering price of
$ per share, the
midpoint of the estimated price range shown on the cover page of
this prospectus). The exercise of outstanding options and future
equity issuances may result in further dilution to investors. A
$1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering
price of
$ per
share would increase (decrease) our pro forma as adjusted net
tangible book value per share after this offering and the
concurrent private placement by
$ ,
and the dilution to new investors by
$ ,
assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after
deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses payable by us. See
“Dilution.”
Future sales of our common stock, or the perception that
such future sales may occur, may cause our stock price to
decline and impair our ability to obtain capital through future
stock offerings.
A substantial number of shares of our common stock could be sold
into the public market after this offering. The occurrence of
such sales, or the perception that such sales could occur, could
materially and adversely affect our stock price and could impair
our ability to obtain capital through an offering of equity
22
securities. The shares of common stock being sold in this
offering will be freely tradable, except for any shares sold to
our affiliates.
In connection with this offering, all members of our senior
management, our directors and substantially all of our
stockholders have entered into written “lock-up”
agreements providing in general that, for a period of
180 days from the date of this prospectus, they will not,
among other things, sell their shares without the prior written
consent of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Goldman,
Sachs & Co. However, these
lock-up agreements are
subject to a number of specified exceptions. See “Shares
Eligible for Future Sale —
Lock-up
Agreements” for more information regarding these
lock-up agreements.
Upon the expiration of the
lock-up period, an
additional shares of
our common stock will be tradable in the public market subject,
in most cases, to volume and other restrictions under federal
securities laws. In addition, upon completion of this offering,
options and warrants exercisable for an aggregate of
approximately shares
of our common stock will be outstanding. We have entered into
agreements with the holders of
approximately shares
of our common stock under which, subject to the applicable
lock-up agreements, we
may be required to register those shares.
Approximately % of our
outstanding common stock has been deposited into a voting trust,
which could affect the outcome of stockholder actions.
Upon completion of this offering,
approximately shares
of our common stock owned by affiliates of Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC, representing
approximately % of our common
stock then outstanding, will become subject to a voting trust
agreement pursuant to which the shares will be voted by an
independent voting trustee.
The
voting trust agreement requires that the trustee cause the
shares subject to the voting trust to be represented at all
stockholder meetings for purposes of determining a quorum, but
the trustee is not required to vote the shares on any matter. If
the trustee votes the shares on any matter subject to a
stockholder vote, including proposals involving the election of
directors, changes of control and other significant corporate
transactions, the shares will be voted in the same proportion as
votes cast
“for” or
“against” those
proposals by our other stockholders. As long as these shares
continue to be held in the voting trust, if the trustee
determines to vote the shares on a particular matter, the voting
power of all other stockholders will be magnified by the
operation of the voting trust. With respect to matters such as
the election of directors, Delaware law provides that the
requisite stockholder vote is based on the shares actually
voted. Accordingly, with respect to these matters, the voting
trust will make it possible to control the
“majority”
vote of our stockholders with
only % of our outstanding common
stock. In addition, with respect to other matters, including the
approval of a merger or acquisition of
our company or
substantially all of our assets, a majority or other specified
percentage of our outstanding shares of common stock must be
voted in favor of the matter in order for it to be adopted. If
the trustee does not vote the shares subject to the voting trust
on these matters, the effect of the non-vote would be equivalent
to a vote
“against” the matter, making it
substantially more difficult to achieve stockholder approval of
the matter. See
“Description of Capital Stock —
Voting Trust Agreement” for more information regarding
the
voting trust agreement.
Certain provisions in our charter documents and agreements
and Delaware law may inhibit potential acquisition bids for
CommVault and prevent changes in our management.
Effective on the closing of this offering, our certificate of
incorporation and
bylaws will contain provisions that could
depress the trading price of our common stock by acting to
discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of
our company
or changes in management that our stockholders might deem
advantageous. Specific provisions in our certificate of
incorporation will include:
|
|
|
| |
• |
our ability to issue preferred stock with terms that the board
of directors may determine, without stockholder approval; |
| |
| |
• |
a classified board in which only a third of the total board
members will be elected at each annual stockholder meeting; |
23
|
|
|
| |
• |
advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and
nominations; and |
| |
| |
• |
limitations on convening stockholder meetings. |
As a result of these and other provisions in our certificate of
incorporation, the price investors may be willing to pay in the
future for shares of our common stock may be limited.
In addition, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law, which imposes certain restrictions on
mergers and other business combinations between us and any
holder of 15% or more of our common stock. Further, certain of
our employment agreements and incentive plans provide for
vesting of stock options and/or payments to be made to the
employees thereunder if their employment is terminated in
connection with a change of control, which could discourage,
delay or prevent a merger or acquisition at a premium price. See
“Management — Employment Agreements,”
“— Change of Control Agreements” and
“— Employee Benefit Plans” and
“Description of Capital Stock — Anti-Takeover
Effects of Provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and
Bylaws” and
“— Delaware Business Combination
Statute.”
We do not expect to pay any dividends in the foreseeable
future.
We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends to holders of our
common stock in the foreseeable future. Consequently, investors
must rely on sales of their common stock after price
appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize
any future gains on their investment. Investors seeking cash
dividends should not purchase our common stock.
We will incur increased costs as a result of being a
public company.
As a public company, we will incur significant legal, accounting
and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company.
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and new NASDAQ rules promulgated in response to the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act regulate corporate governance practices of
public companies. We expect that compliance with these public
company requirements will increase our costs and make some
activities more time consuming. For example, we will create new
board committees and adopt new internal controls and disclosure
controls and procedures. In addition, we will incur additional
expenses associated with our SEC reporting requirements. A
number of those requirements will require us to carry out
activities we have not done previously. For example, under
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, for our annual
report on
Form
10-K for
fiscal year ending
March 31, 2008, we will need to document
and test our internal control procedures, our management will
need to assess and report on our internal control over financial
reporting and our registered public accounting firm will need to
issue an opinion on that assessment and the effectiveness of
those controls. Furthermore, if we identify any issues in
complying with those requirements (for example, if we or our
registered public accounting firm identify a material weakness
or significant deficiency in our internal control over financial
reporting), we could incur additional costs rectifying those
issues, and the existence of those issues could adversely affect
us, our reputation or investor perceptions of us. We also expect
that it will be difficult and expensive to obtain director and
officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept
reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher
costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it
may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified
persons to serve on our board of directors or as executive
officers. Advocacy efforts by stockholders and third parties may
also prompt even more changes in governance and reporting
requirements. We cannot predict or estimate the amount of
additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.
24
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements. In some
cases, you can identify these statements by our use of
forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,”
“should,” “anticipate,”
“estimate,” “expect,” “plan,”
“believe,” “predict,” “potential,”
“project,” “intend,” “could” or
similar expressions. In particular, statements regarding our
plans, strategies, prospects and expectations regarding our
business are forward-looking statements. You should be aware
that these statements and any other forward-looking statements
in this document only reflect our expectations and are not
guarantees of performance. These statements involve risks,
uncertainties and assumptions. Many of these risks,
uncertainties and assumptions are beyond our control, and may
cause actual results and performance to differ materially from
our expectations. Important factors that could cause our actual
results to be materially different from our expectations include
the risks and uncertainties set forth in this prospectus under
the heading “Risk Factors.” Accordingly, you should
not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements
contained in this prospectus. These forward-looking statements
speak only as of the date on which the statements were made. We
undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise, except as required by
law.
25
USE OF PROCEEDS
We estimate that the net proceeds from the sale of shares by us
in the offering (based on an offering price of
$ per
share, the midpoint of the estimated price range shown on the
cover page of this prospectus), after deducting estimated
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us, will be
$ million.
We intend to use these proceeds, together with the estimated
proceeds of
$ million
from the concurrent private placement (based on an offering
price of
$ per
share, the midpoint of the estimated price range shown on the
cover page of this prospectus) and estimated borrowings of
$ million
under our new term loan, to pay
$ million
in satisfaction of amounts due on our Series A, B, C, D and
E preferred stock upon its conversion into common stock.
Our affiliates will receive
$ million
(based on an offering price of
$ per
share, the midpoint of the estimated price range shown on the
cover page of this prospectus),
or %, of the estimated net
proceeds to us from the offering, the concurrent private
placement and borrowings under our new term loan as a result of
their holdings of our Series A, B, C, D and E preferred
stock (assuming that the offering is completed
on ,
2006). See “Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions.”
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of
$ per
share would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this
offering and the concurrent private placement by
$ million
and would decrease (increase) the amount of borrowings on the
closing date under our new term loan by
$ million,
assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after
deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of common stock
by the selling stockholders.
DIVIDEND POLICY
We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock, and we
intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to fund the growth
of our business. We therefore do not anticipate paying any cash
dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Our
future decisions concerning the payment of dividends on our
common stock will depend upon our results of operations,
financial condition and capital expenditure plans, as well as
any other factors that the board of directors, in its sole
discretion, may consider relevant.
26
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents,
total current liabilities and capitalization as of
December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
| |
• |
on an actual basis; |
| |
| |
• |
on a pro forma basis after giving effect to each of the
following events as if each had occurred at December 31,
2005: |
|
|
|
| |
• |
the conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock
into a total
of shares
of common stock upon the closing of this offering; |
| |
| |
• |
the payment of
$ million
in satisfaction of the cash amount due to holders of our
Series A, B, C, D and E preferred stock upon its conversion
into common stock upon the completion of this offering
(including accrued dividends, and assuming the offering is
completed
on , 2006); |
| |
| |
• |
the borrowing of
$ million
under our new term loan on or immediately prior to the closing
date of this offering in connection with the payments to the
holders of our Series A, B, C, D and E preferred
stock; and |
| |
| |
• |
the completion of the concurrent private placement
of shares
of our common stock at the public offering price and the
application of the proceeds therefrom. Assuming an offering
price of
$ per
share (the midpoint of the estimated price range shown on the
cover page of this prospectus) we will raise
$ million
in proceeds from the concurrent private placement. |
|
|
|
| |
• |
on a pro forma as adjusted basis after giving effect to our
receipt of the net proceeds from our sale
of shares
of common stock in this offering at an assumed public offering
price of
$ (the
midpoint of the estimated price range shown on the cover page of
this prospectus), after deducting estimated underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses
payable by us, as if it had occurred at December 31, 2005. |
You should read this table together with the discussion under
the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our
financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in
this prospectus.
27
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
As of December 31, 2005 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Pro Forma As |
| |
|
Actual | |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Adjusted(1) |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(In thousands, except share and |
| |
|
per share amounts) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
43,256 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
$ |
40,072 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Term loan, less current portion
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Cumulative redeemable convertible preferred stock,
$0.01 par value per share, authorized in Series A, B,
C, D and E: 7,000,000 total shares authorized, 3,166,254 total
shares issued and outstanding, actual; no shares authorized,
issued or outstanding, pro forma or pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
97,773 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Stockholders’ deficit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share,
authorized in Series AA, BB and CC: 22,150,000 total shares
authorized, 19,251,820 total shares issued and outstanding,
actual; no shares authorized, issued or outstanding,
pro forma or pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
94,352 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share, no shares
authorized, issued or outstanding, actual or pro
forma; shares
authorized, no shares issued or outstanding, pro forma as
adjusted
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, shares
authorized, shares
issued and outstanding,
actual; shares
authorized, shares
issued and outstanding, pro
forma; shares
authorized, shares
issued and outstanding, pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
(859 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(170,140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total stockholders’ deficit
|
|
|
(75,973 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$ |
21,800 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
A $1.00 increase in the assumed initial public offering price of
$ per
share would increase each of cash and cash equivalents,
additional paid-in capital and total capitalization by
$ million
and would decrease borrowings under our new term loan and total
stockholders’ deficit by
$ million
and
$ million,
respectively, assuming the number of shares offered by us, as
set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same
and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. A
$1.00 decrease in the assumed initial public offering price of
$ per
share would decrease each of cash and cash equivalents,
additional paid-in capital and total capitalization by
$ million
and would increase |
28
|
|
|
borrowings under our new term loan and total stockholders’
deficit by
$ million
and
$ million,
respectively, assuming the number of shares offered by us, as
set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same
and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. |
|
|
| |
Share information above excludes: |
|
|
|
| |
• |
shares
of common stock available for issuance under our 1996 Stock
Option Plan,
including shares
of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock
options as
of ,
2006 at a weighted average exercise price of
$ per
share; |
| |
| |
• |
shares
of common stock issuable upon exercise of a warrant held by Dell
Ventures, L.P. at an exercise price of
$ per
share; and |
| |
| |
• |
shares
of common stock initially available for issuance under our 2006
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. |
29
DILUTION
If you invest in our common stock, your ownership interest will
be diluted to the extent of the difference between the public
offering price per share of our common stock and the pro forma
as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common
stock immediately after this offering. The pro forma net
tangible book value of our common stock as of
December 31,
2005 was
$ million,
or approximately
$ per
share. Pro forma net tangible book value per share represents
the amount of our total tangible assets less our total
liabilities divided by the pro forma number of shares of common
stock outstanding after giving effect to:
|
|
|
| |
• |
the conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock
into a total
of shares
of common stock; |
| |
| |
• |
the payment of
$ million
in cash in satisfaction of the cash amount due to holders of our
Series A, B, C, D and E preferred stock upon its conversion
into common stock (including accrued dividends, and assuming the
offering is completed
on , 2006); |
| |
| |
• |
the borrowing of
$ million
under our new term loan on or immediately prior to the closing
date of this offering in connection with the payments to the
holders of our Series A, B, C, D and E preferred
stock; and |
| |
| |
• |
the completion of the concurrent private placement
of shares
of our common stock at the public offering price and the
application of the proceeds therefrom. Assuming an offering
price of
$ per
share (the midpoint of the estimated price range shown on the
cover page of this prospectus) we will raise
$ million
in proceeds from the concurrent private placement. |
Dilution in pro forma net tangible book value per share
represents the difference between the amount per share paid by
purchasers of shares of common stock in this offering and the
pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share of
common stock immediately after the completion of this offering.
After giving effect to the sale
of shares
of common stock in this offering
and shares
of common stock in the concurrent private placement at an
assumed public offering price of
$ (the
midpoint of the estimated price range shown on the cover page of
this prospectus), and after deducting the estimated underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses
payable by us, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book
value as of
December 31, 2005 would have been
$ million,
or approximately
$ per
share. This represents an immediate increase in pro forma as
adjusted net tangible book value of
$ per
share to existing stockholders and an immediate dilution of
$ per
share to new investors. The following table illustrates this per
share dilution:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed initial public offering price per share
|
|
|
|
$ |
| |
|
|
$ |
|
|
| |
Increase per share attributable to new investors
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after
this offering
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per share to new investors
|
|
|
|
$ |
| |
|
|
|
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of
$ per
share would increase (decrease) our pro forma as adjusted net
tangible book value per share after this offering and the
concurrent private placement by
$ ,
and the dilution to new investors by
$ ,
assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after
deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
30
The following table presents, on a pro forma as adjusted basis,
as of
December 31, 2005, the differences among the number
of shares of common stock purchased from us, the total
consideration paid or exchanged and the average price per share
paid by existing stockholders and by new investors purchasing
shares of our common stock in this offering and the concurrent
private placement before deducting the estimated underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses
payable by us. The table assumes an initial public offering
price of
$ per
share, as specified above, and deducts the estimated
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Shares Purchased | |
|
Total Consideration | |
|
Average | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Price per | |
| |
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
Share | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data) | |
|
Existing stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
New investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The foregoing table and calculations assume no exercise of any
options and exclude:
|
|
|
| |
• |
shares
of common stock available for issuance under our 1996 Stock
Option Plan,
including shares
of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock
options as
of ,
2006 at a weighted average exercise price of
$ per
share; |
| |
| |
• |
shares
of common stock issuable upon exercise of a warrant held by Dell
Ventures, L.P. at an exercise price of
$ per
share; and |
| |
| |
• |
shares
of common stock initially available for issuance under our 2006
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. |
The exercise of outstanding options and the Dell Ventures, L.P.
warrant will result in further dilution.
31
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
You should read the following selected financial data together
with the discussion under “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”
and our financial statements and the related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
We derived the statement of operations data for each of the
three years in the period ended
March 31, 2005 and the
balance sheet data as of
March 31, 2004 and
March 31,
2005 from our audited consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus. We derived the statement of
operations data for each of the two years in the period ended
March 31, 2002 and the balance sheet data as of
March 31, 2001,
2002 and
2003 from our audited consolidated
financial statements that are not included in this prospectus.
We derived the statement of operations data for each of the nine
months ended
December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2005
and the balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2005 from our
unaudited consolidated interim financial statements that are
included elsewhere in this prospectus. We derived the balance
sheet data as of
December 31, 2004 from our unaudited
consolidated interim financial statements that are not included
in this prospectus. In our opinion, the unaudited consolidated
interim financial statements have been prepared on the same
basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and
include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
adjustments, that management considers necessary for a fair
presentation of the financial position and results of operations
for these periods. The results for any interim period are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for
any other interim period or for the full fiscal year, and the
historical results set forth below do not necessarily indicate
results expected for any future period.
32
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
For the Nine Months | |
| |
|
For the Year Ended March 31, | |
|
Ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Software:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
QiNetix
|
|
$ |
8,505 |
|
|
$ |
17,460 |
|
|
$ |
29,485 |
|
|
$ |
39,474 |
|
|
$ |
49,598 |
|
|
$ |
35,317 |
|
|
$ |
47,335 |
|
| |
|
Vault 98
|
|
|
2,484 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Total software
|
|
|
10,989 |
|
|
|
17,774 |
|
|
|
29,485 |
|
|
|
39,474 |
|
|
|
49,598 |
|
|
|
35,317 |
|
|
|
47,335 |
|
| |
Services
|
|
|
11,785 |
|
|
|
11,677 |
|
|
|
14,840 |
|
|
|
21,772 |
|
|
|
33,031 |
|
|
|
23,702 |
|
|
|
33,351 |
|
| |
Hardware, supplies and other
|
|
|
5,240 |
|
|
|
1,397 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
28,014 |
|
|
|
30,848 |
|
|
|
44,419 |
|
|
|
61,246 |
|
|
|
82,629 |
|
|
|
59,019 |
|
|
|
80,686 |
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
QiNetix software
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
1,497 |
|
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
1,316 |
|
| |
Vault 98 software
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Services
|
|
|
6,454 |
|
|
|
6,449 |
|
|
|
6,095 |
|
|
|
8,049 |
|
|
|
9,975 |
|
|
|
7,328 |
|
|
|
9,278 |
|
| |
Hardware, supplies and other
|
|
|
3,385 |
|
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
10,182 |
|
|
|
7,851 |
|
|
|
7,099 |
|
|
|
9,217 |
|
|
|
11,472 |
|
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
|
10,594 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
17,832 |
|
|
|
22,997 |
|
|
|
37,320 |
|
|
|
52,029 |
|
|
|
71,157 |
|
|
|
50,519 |
|
|
|
70,092 |
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
23,375 |
|
|
|
27,352 |
|
|
|
29,842 |
|
|
|
37,592 |
|
|
|
43,248 |
|
|
|
31,475 |
|
|
|
37,185 |
|
| |
Research and development
|
|
|
13,215 |
|
|
|
15,867 |
|
|
|
16,153 |
|
|
|
16,214 |
|
|
|
17,239 |
|
|
|
12,596 |
|
|
|
13,945 |
|
| |
General and administrative
|
|
|
6,261 |
|
|
|
6,291 |
|
|
|
6,332 |
|
|
|
8,599 |
|
|
|
8,955 |
|
|
|
6,739 |
|
|
|
8,895 |
|
| |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,029 |
|
|
|
3,021 |
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
1,390 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
| |
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(28,048 |
) |
|
|
(30,728 |
) |
|
|
(16,759 |
) |
|
|
(11,772 |
) |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
(1,290 |
) |
|
|
8,914 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
Other income
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,430 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
812 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(26,658 |
) |
|
|
(30,119 |
) |
|
|
(16,462 |
) |
|
|
(11,698 |
) |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
(1,084 |
) |
|
|
9,719 |
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(636 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(26,203 |
) |
|
|
(29,887 |
) |
|
|
(16,410 |
) |
|
|
(11,698 |
) |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
(1,148 |
) |
|
|
9,083 |
|
|
Less: accretion of preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(5,652 |
) |
|
|
(5,661 |
) |
|
|
(5,661 |
) |
|
|
(5,676 |
) |
|
|
(5,661 |
) |
|
|
(4,265 |
) |
|
|
(4,265 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
(31,855 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,548 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,071 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,374 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,178 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,413 |
) |
|
$ |
4,818 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic
|
|
$ |
(0.91 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.98 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.47 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.91 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.98 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.47 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing per share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic
|
|
|
35,193 |
|
|
|
36,224 |
|
|
|
36,741 |
|
|
|
37,201 |
|
|
|
37,424 |
|
|
|
37,363 |
|
|
|
37,628 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Diluted
|
|
|
35,193 |
|
|
|
36,224 |
|
|
|
36,741 |
|
|
|
37,201 |
|
|
|
37,424 |
|
|
|
37,363 |
|
|
|
70,412 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
As of March 31, | |
|
As of December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
32,459 |
|
|
$ |
27,704 |
|
|
$ |
7,611 |
|
|
$ |
22,958 |
|
|
$ |
24,795 |
|
|
$ |
23,337 |
|
|
$ |
43,256 |
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
25,586 |
|
|
|
20,626 |
|
|
|
5,633 |
|
|
|
13,164 |
|
|
|
13,441 |
|
|
|
11,902 |
|
|
|
21,648 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
44,337 |
|
|
|
37,802 |
|
|
|
26,489 |
|
|
|
41,779 |
|
|
|
47,513 |
|
|
|
43,527 |
|
|
|
64,754 |
|
|
Cumulative redeemable convertible preferred stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Series A through E, at liquidation value
|
|
|
70,847 |
|
|
|
76,508 |
|
|
|
82,170 |
|
|
|
87,846 |
|
|
|
93,507 |
|
|
|
92,112 |
|
|
|
97,773 |
|
|
Total stockholders’ deficit
|
|
|
(39,418 |
) |
|
|
(53,554 |
) |
|
|
(75,561 |
) |
|
|
(75,910 |
) |
|
|
(81,010 |
) |
|
|
(81,374 |
) |
|
|
(75,973 |
) |
33
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion and analysis along
with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus. Except for the historical
information contained herein, this discussion contains
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
Actual results could differ materially from those discussed
below; accordingly, investors should not place undue reliance
upon our forward-looking statements. See “Risk
Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements” for a
discussion of these risks and uncertainties.
Overview
CommVault is a leading provider of data management software
applications and related services. We develop, market and sell a
unified suite of data management software applications under the
QiNetix brand. QiNetix is specifically designed to protect and
manage data throughout its lifecycle in less time, at lower cost
and with fewer resources than alternative solutions. We also
provide our customers with a broad range of highly effective
professional services that are delivered by our worldwide
support and field operations.
We began operations in 1988 as a development group within Bell
Labs and were later designated as an AT&T Network Systems
strategic business unit. We were formed to develop automated
backup, archiving and recovery products for AT&T’s
internal use. These products were comprised of internally
developed software integrated with third party hardware. Our
business became a part of Lucent Technologies, which was created
by and later spun-off from AT&T. Donaldson,
Lufkin & Jenrette Merchant Banking and the Sprout Group
funded and completed a management buyout of
our Company from
Lucent in May 1996. After the buyout, we continued to sell our
software products integrated with third party hardware,
primarily UNIX servers and optical and magnetic tape libraries.
These combined hardware and software products were marketed as
ABARS, or Automated Backup and Recovery Solution, through 1997,
at which time we renamed the products Vault 98.
In April 1998, our board of directors and a new management team
changed our strategic direction. We believed that the data
management software industry would shift from local,
server-attached environments to more complex and widely
distributed data networks. We believed that a broad suite of
data management software applications built upon a new
innovative architecture and a single underlying code base would
more easily and cost-effectively manage data in this complex
networked environment. We also believed that our competitors
would address this opportunity by adapting their legacy
platforms and by developing or acquiring new applications built
upon dissimilar underlying software architectures. We believed,
and continue to believe, that managing data with this type of
loosely integrated solution would be more difficult and costly
for the customer. We also recognized that our legacy Vault 98
technology was too limited to address the broader data
management market opportunity. This vision resulted in an almost
two-year development project that culminated in the introduction
of our Galaxy data protection software in February 2000. Galaxy
represented the first of our software applications built upon
our new architectural platform, and we now market it as one of
the applications in our QiNetix software suite. The introduction
of Galaxy also marked the beginning of the phasing out of both
our Vault 98 products and the sale of third party hardware. We
substantially completed the phase-out of our sales of Vault 98
products and third party hardware in September 2001.
We have spent the past six years developing, enhancing and
introducing the following eight applications as part of our
QiNetix software suite built upon our unified architectural
design: QiNetix Galaxy Backup and Recovery (released in 2000),
QiNetix DataMigrator (released in 2002), QiNetix QuickRecovery
(released in 2002), QiNetix DataArchiver (released in 2003),
QiNetix StorageManager (released in 2003), QiNetix QNet
(released in 2003), QiNetix Data Classification (released in
2005) and QiNetix ContinuousDataReplicator (beta only). In
addition to QiNetix Galaxy, the subsequent release of
34
our other QiNetix software has substantially increased our
addressable market. As of
December 31, 2005, we had
licensed our software applications to over 3,400 registered
customers.
We derive the majority of our revenues from sales of licenses of
our software applications. We do not customize our software for
a specific end user customer. We sell our software applications
to end user customers both directly through our sales force and
indirectly through our global network of value-added reseller
partners, systems integrators, corporate resellers and original
equipment manufacturers. Our corporate resellers bundle or sell
our software applications together with their own products, and
our value-added resellers sell our software applications
independently. We have agreements with original equipment
manufacturers that sell, market and support our software
applications and services on a stand-alone basis and/or
incorporate our software applications into their own hardware
products.
Our services revenue is made up of fees from the delivery of
customer support and other professional services, which are
typically sold in connection with the sale of our software
applications. Customer support agreements provide technical
support and unspecified software updates on a
when-and-if-available basis for an annual fee based on licenses
purchased and the level of service subscribed. Other
professional services include consulting, assessment and design
services, implementation and post-deployment services and
training, all of which to date have predominantly been sold in
connection with the sale of software applications.
|
|
|
Description of Costs and Expenses |
Our cost of revenues is as follows:
|
|
|
| |
• |
Cost of Software Revenue, consists primarily of third
party royalties and other costs such as media, manuals,
translation and distribution costs; |
| |
| |
• |
Cost of Services Revenue, consists primarily of salary
and employee benefit costs in providing customer support and
other professional services; and |
| |
| |
• |
Cost of Hardware, Supplies and Other Revenue, consists
primarily of third party costs related to the procurement of
products for resale to our customers. We substantially completed
the phase out of our sales of third party hardware in September
2001. |
Our operating expenses are as follows:
|
|
|
| |
• |
Sales and Marketing, consists primarily of salaries,
commissions, employee benefits and other direct and indirect
business expenses, including travel related expenses, sales
promotion expenses, public relations expenses and costs for
marketing materials and other marketing events (such as trade
shows and advertising); |
| |
| |
• |
Research and Development, which is primarily the expense
of developing new software applications and modifying existing
software applications, consists principally of salaries and
benefits for research and development personnel and related
expenses; contract labor expense and consulting fees as well as
other expenses associated with the design, certification and
testing of our software applications; and legal costs associated
with the patent registration of such software applications; |
| |
| |
• |
General and Administrative, consists primarily of
salaries and benefits for our executive, accounting, human
resources, legal, information systems and other administrative
personnel. Also included in this category are other general
corporate expenses, such as outside legal and accounting
services and insurance; and |
| |
| |
• |
Depreciation and Amortization, consists of depreciation
expense primarily for computer equipment we use for information
services and in our development and test labs. |
We anticipate that each of the above categories of operating
expenses will increase in dollar amounts, but will decline as a
percentage of total revenues in the long-term.
35
Critical Accounting Policies
In presenting our consolidated financial statements in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles, we are required to make estimates and judgments that
affect the amounts reported therein. Some of the estimates and
assumptions we are required to make relate to matters that are
inherently uncertain as they pertain to future events. We base
these estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that we believe to be reasonable and appropriate.
Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.
The following is a description of our accounting policies that
we believe require subjective and complex judgments, which could
potentially have a material effect on our reported financial
condition or results of operations.
Currently we derive revenues from two primary sources, or
elements: software licenses and services. Services include
customer support, consulting, assessment and design services,
installation services and training. A typical sales arrangement
includes both of these elements. We apply the provisions of
Statement of Position
(“SOP”) 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, as amended by
SOP 98-4 and
SOP 98-9, and
related interpretations to all transactions to determine the
recognition of revenue.
For software arrangements involving multiple elements, we
recognize revenue using the residual method as described in
SOP 98-9. Under
the residual method, we allocate and defer revenue for the
undelivered elements based on relative fair value and recognize
the difference between the total arrangement fee and the amount
deferred for the undelivered elements as revenue. The
determination of fair value of each element in multiple element
arrangements is based on the price charged when the same element
is sold separately. To determine the price for the customer
support element when sold separately, we use historical renewal
rates, and for sales through original equipment manufacturers,
we use stated renewal rates.
Software licenses typically provide for the perpetual right to
use our software and are sold on a per-copy basis or as site
licenses. Site licenses give the customer the additional right
to deploy the software on a limited basis during a specified
term. We recognize software license revenue through direct sales
channels upon receipt of a purchase order or other persuasive
evidence and when all other basic revenue recognition criteria
are met as described below. We recognize software license
revenue through all indirect sales channels on a sell-through
model. A sell-through model requires that we recognize revenue
when the basic revenue recognition criteria are met as described
below and these channels complete the sale of our software
products to the end user. Revenue from software licenses sold
through an original equipment manufacturer partner is recognized
upon the receipt of a royalty report or purchase order from that
original equipment manufacturer partner.
Services revenue includes revenue from customer support and
other professional services. Customer support includes software
updates (including unspecified product upgrades and
enhancements) on a when-and-if-available basis, telephone
support and bug fixes or patches. Customer support revenue is
recognized ratably over the term of the customer support
agreement, which is typically one year. Other professional
services such as consulting and installation services provided
by us are not mandatory and can also be performed by the
customer or a third party. Revenues from consulting, assessment
and design services and installation services are based upon a
daily or weekly rate and are recognized when the services are
completed. Training includes courses taught by our instructors
or third party contractors either at one of our facilities or at
the customer’s site. Training fees are recognized after the
training course has been provided.
We have analyzed all of the elements included in our
multiple-element arrangements and determined that we have
vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value to allocate
revenues to services. Accordingly, assuming all basic revenue
recognition criteria are met, license revenue is recognized upon
delivery of the software license using the residual method in
accordance with SOP 98-9.
36
We consider the four basic revenue recognition criteria for each
of the elements as follows:
|
|
|
| |
• |
Persuasive evidence of an arrangement with the customer
exists. It is our customary practice to have a purchase
order and, in some cases, a written contract signed by both the
customer and us, or other persuasive evidence that an
arrangement exists prior to recognizing revenue on an
arrangement. |
| |
| |
• |
Delivery or performance has occurred. Our software
applications are usually physically delivered to our customers
with standard transfer terms such as FOB shipping point.
Software and/or software license keys for add-on orders or
software updates are typically delivered via
e-mail. If products
that are essential to the functionality of the delivered
software in an arrangement have not been delivered, we do not
consider delivery to have occurred. Services revenue is
recognized when the services are completed, except for customer
support, which is recognized ratably over the term of the
customer support agreement, which is typically one year. |
| |
| |
• |
Vendor’s fee is fixed or determinable. The fee our
customers pay for our software applications, customer support
and other professional services is negotiated at the outset of
an arrangement. The fees are therefore considered to be fixed or
determinable at the inception of the arrangement. |
| |
| |
• |
Collection is probable. We assess the probability of
collection on a customer-by-customer basis. Each of our new
customers undergoes a credit review process to evaluate the
customer’s financial position and ability to pay. If we
determine from the outset of an arrangement that collection is
not probable based upon our review process, we recognize the
revenue on a cash-collected basis. |
Our arrangements do not generally include acceptance clauses.
However, if an arrangement does include an acceptance clause, we
defer the revenue for such arrangement and recognize it upon
acceptance. Acceptance occurs upon the earliest of receipt of a
written customer acceptance, waiver of customer acceptance or
expiration of the acceptance period.
We have offered limited price protection under certain original
equipment manufacturer agreements. Any right to a future refund
from such price protection is entirely within our control. We
estimate that the likelihood of a future payout due to price
protection is remote.
We account for our employee stock-based compensation in
accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and related interpretations, which require us to
recognize compensation expense for the excess of the fair value
of the stock at the grant date over the exercise price, if any,
and to recognize that cost over the vesting period of the
option. In Note 2 of our consolidated financial statements,
we have presented the pro forma effect on net income (loss)
attributable to common stockholders as if we had applied the
fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (
“SFAS”) No. 123,
Share-Based Payment. We will adopt SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004)
Share-Based Payment
(
“SFAS No. 123(R)”), on
April 1,
2006 using the modified prospective approach in which the pro
forma disclosures will no longer be an alternative to financial
statement recognition. The adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)
is more fully described below in
“Recent Accounting
Pronouncements.”
For the purposes of establishing the fair value of our common
stock for all options, we did not obtain contemporaneous
valuations by an unrelated specialist because we believed that
our internal valuation model was sufficient. We used a
consistent formula based on our
12-month projected
revenues in periods where we were not profitable and 12-month
projected earnings when we started to achieve consistent
profitability in recent fiscal quarters. We based our valuation
on revenues or earnings multiples of a
37
comparable group of public data storage/management software
companies. We then applied a discount to these multiples based
on the following reasons:
|
|
|
| |
• |
the significant risks related to, and market acceptance
associated with, our products; |
| |
| |
• |
the difficulty of competing as a smaller private company in a
market that has been historically dominated by larger public
companies; and |
| |
| |
• |
the preferential rights of the outstanding convertible preferred
stock with respect to liquidation preferences, voting control
and anti-dilution rights. |
We reduced the discount to the revenues and earnings multiples
as we got closer to a possible initial public offering of our
common stock as we achieved more consistent profitability and
mitigated some of the factors noted above. In addition, we
reduced our valuation by the cash payout required to certain of
our preferred stockholders upon an initial public offering.
We granted stock options during the months ended
January 31, 2005,
May 31, 2005,
July 31, 2005,
September 30, 2005 and
November 30, 2005 and
determined that the fair market value per share of our common
stock was $2.65, $2.25, $2.35, $2.89 and $3.35, respectively, at
such grant dates. In addition, we recorded deferred stock
compensation of $0.9 million for the issuance of 1,600,000
options that were granted with an exercise price that was below
the fair market value of our common stock on the date of such
grant in September 2005. The deferred compensation for these
options is being recognized ratably over the four-year vesting
period.
The reasons for the difference between the weighted average fair
market values and an estimated initial public offering price of
$ per
share are due to continued revenue growth and profitability,
which indirectly reduces the risks associated with competing as
a private company, and overall market acceptance of our products.
Based on an estimated initial public offering price of
$ per
share, the intrinsic value of the options outstanding as of
December 31, 2005, was
$ million,
of which
$ million
related to vested options and
$ million
related to unvested options.
|
|
|
Accounting for Income Taxes |
As part of the process of preparing our financial statements, we
are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the
jurisdictions in which we operate. We record this amount as a
provision or benefit for taxes in accordance with
SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. This
process involves estimating our actual current tax exposure,
including assessing the risks associated with tax audits, and
assessing temporary differences resulting from different
treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These
differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities. As of
December 31, 2005, we had deferred tax assets of
approximately $54.9 million, which were primarily related
to federal, state and foreign net operating loss carryforwards
and federal and state research tax credit carryforwards. We
assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be
recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent that we
believe recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation
allowance. Due to the uncertainty of future profitability, we
have recorded a valuation allowance equal to the
$54.9 million of deferred tax assets. If our actual results
differ from these estimates, our provision for income taxes
could be materially impacted.
|
|
|
Software Development Costs |
Research and development expenditures are charged to operations
as incurred. SFAS No. 86, Accounting for the Costs
of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased or Otherwise
Marketed, requires capitalization of certain software
development costs subsequent to the establishment of
technological feasibility. Based on our software development
process, technological feasibility is established upon
completion of a working model, which also requires certification
and extensive testing. Costs incurred by us between completion
of the working model and the point at which the product is ready
for general release historically have been immaterial.
38
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth each of our sources of revenues
and costs of revenues for the specified periods as a percentage
of our total revenues for those periods (due to rounding,
numbers in the columns may not sum to totals):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
For the Nine Months | |
| |
|
For the Year Ended March 31, | |
|
Ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Software
|
|
|
66% |
|
|
|
64% |
|
|
|
60% |
|
|
|
60% |
|
|
|
59% |
|
| |
Services
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
| |
Hardware, supplies and other
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Software
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
| |
Services
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
| |
Hardware, supplies and other
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
84% |
|
|
|
85% |
|
|
|
86% |
|
|
|
86% |
|
|
|
87% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues increased $21.7 million, or 37%, from
$59.0 million in the nine months ended
December 31,
2004 to $80.7 million in the nine months ended
December 31, 2005.
Software Revenue. Software revenue increased
$12.0 million, or 34%, from $35.3 million in the nine
months ended
December 31, 2004 to $47.3 million in the
nine months ended
December 31, 2005. Software revenue
represented 60% of our total revenues in the nine months ended
December 31, 2004 and 59% of our total revenues in the nine
months ended
December 31, 2005. The increase in software
revenue was primarily the result of our addition of new
customers, broader acceptance of our software applications and
increased sales through our direct channels and by our resellers
and original equipment manufacturers.
Services Revenue. Services revenue increased
$9.6 million, or 41%, from $23.7 million in the nine
months ended
December 31, 2004 to $33.4 million in the
nine months ended
December 31, 2005. Services revenue
represented 40% of our total revenues in the nine months ended
December 31, 2004 and 41% of our total revenues in the nine
months ended
December 31, 2005. The increase in services
revenue was primarily due to an increase in customer support
agreements that accompany sales of software to new customers.
Total cost of revenues increased $2.1 million, or 25%, from
$8.5 million in the nine months ended
December 31,
2004 to $10.6 million in nine months ended
December 31, 2005. Total cost of revenues represented 14%
of our total revenues in the nine months ended
December 31,
2004 and 13% of our total revenues in the nine months ended
December 31, 2005.
Cost of Software Revenue. Cost of software revenue
increased $0.1 million, or 12%, from $1.2 million in
the nine months ended
December 31, 2004 to
$1.3 million in the nine months ended
39
December 31, 2005. Cost of software revenue represented 3%
of our total software revenue in the nine months ended
December 31, 2004 and
2005. The increase in cost of
software revenue was primarily the result of higher third party
costs associated with higher software revenue.
Cost of Services Revenue. Cost of services revenue
increased $2.0 million, or 27%, from $7.3 million in
the nine months ended
December 31, 2004 to
$9.3 million in the nine months ended
December 31,
2005. Cost of services revenue represented 31% of our services
revenue in the nine months ended
December 31, 2004 and 28%
of our services revenue in the nine months ended
December 31, 2005. The increase in cost of services revenue
was primarily the result of increased headcount and other costs
of providing customer support and other professional services,
which resulted from increased sales.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses
increased $5.7 million, or 18%, from $31.5 million in
the nine months ended
December 31, 2004 to
$37.2 million in the nine months ended
December 31,
2005. The increase was primarily due to higher headcount and
increased commission expense on higher revenue levels.
Research and Development. Research and development
expenses increased $1.3 million, or 11%, from
$12.6 million in the nine months ended
December 31,
2004 to $13.9 million in the nine months ended
December 31, 2005. The increase was primarily due to higher
employee compensation and legal expenses.
General and Administrative. General and administrative
expenses increased $2.2 million, or 32%, from
$6.7 million in the nine months ended
December 31,
2004 to $8.9 million in the nine months ended
December 31, 2005. The increase was primarily due to higher
employee compensation and recruiting costs as a result of
increased headcount.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation expense
increased $0.2 million, or 15%, from $1.0 million in
the nine months ended
December 31, 2004 to
$1.2 million in the nine months ended
December 31,
2005. This reflects higher depreciation associated with
increased capital expenditures primarily for product development
and other computer-related equipment.
Interest income increased $0.6 million from
$0.2 million in the nine months ended
December 31,
2004 to $0.8 million in the nine months ended
December 31, 2005. The increase was due to higher interest
rates and higher cash balances in our deposit accounts.
|
|
|
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit |
Income tax expense increased from $0.1 million in the nine
months ended
December 31, 2004 to approximately
$0.6 million in the nine months ended
December 31,
2005 as a result of alternative minimum taxes due to the
U.S. federal government as well as various state income
taxes.
Total revenues increased $21.4 million, or 35%, from
$61.2 million in fiscal 2004 to $82.6 million in
fiscal 2005.
Software Revenue. Software revenue increased
$10.1 million, or 26%, from $39.5 million in fiscal
2004 to $49.6 million in fiscal 2005. Software revenue
represented 64% of our total revenues in fiscal 2004 and 60% of
our total revenues in fiscal 2005. The increase in software
revenue was primarily the result of our addition of new
customers, broader acceptance of our software applications and
increased sales through our direct channels and by our resellers
and original equipment manufacturers. Movements in foreign
exchange rates accounted for $0.9 million of the
$10.1 million increase in software revenue.
40
Services Revenue. Services revenue increased
$11.3 million, or 52%, from $21.8 million in fiscal
2004 to $33.0 million in fiscal 2005. Services revenue
represented 36% of our total revenues in fiscal 2004 and 40% of
our total revenues in fiscal 2005. The increase in services
revenue was primarily due to an increase in customer support
agreements that accompany sales of software to new customers. In
addition, revenue from assessment and design services,
installation services and training increased as a result of
higher software sales.
Total cost of revenues increased $2.3 million, or 24%, from
$9.2 million in fiscal 2004 to $11.5 million in fiscal
2005. Total cost of revenues represented 15% of our total
revenues in fiscal 2004 and 14% of our total revenues in fiscal
2005.
Cost of Software Revenue. Cost of software revenue
increased $0.3 million, or 28%, from $1.2 million in
fiscal 2004 to $1.5 million in fiscal 2005. Cost of
software revenue represented 3% of our total software revenue in
both fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2005. The increase in cost of
software revenue was primarily the result of higher third party
royalty and other costs associated with higher software revenue.
Cost of Services Revenue. Cost of services revenue
increased $1.9 million, or 24%, from $8.0 million in
fiscal 2004 to $10.0 million in fiscal 2005. Cost of
services revenue represented 37% of our services revenue in
fiscal 2004 and 30% of our services revenue in fiscal 2005. The
increase in cost of services revenue was the result of increased
headcount and other costs of providing customer support and
other professional services, which resulted from increased sales.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses
increased $5.7 million, or 15%, from $37.6 million in
fiscal 2004 to $43.2 million in fiscal 2005. The increase
was primarily due to higher headcount and increased commission
expense on higher revenue levels. Movements in foreign exchange
rates accounted for $0.7 million of the $5.7 million
increase in sales and marketing expenses.
Research and Development. Research and development
expenses increased $1.0 million, or 6%, from
$16.2 million in fiscal 2004 to $17.2 million in
fiscal 2005. The increase was primarily due to higher employee
compensation expenses.
General and Administrative. General and administrative
expenses increased $0.4 million, or 4%, from
$8.6 million in fiscal 2004 to $9.0 million in fiscal
2005. The increase reflected higher employee compensation
partially offset by a decrease in legal and accounting fees.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation expense
remained at $1.4 million from fiscal 2004 to fiscal 2005.
This reflects higher depreciation associated with increased
capital expenditures primarily for product development and other
computer-related equipment, offset by certain fixed assets in
our development laboratory becoming fully depreciated.
Interest income increased $0.2 million from
$0.1 million in fiscal 2004 to $0.3 million in fiscal
2005. The increase was due to higher interest rates and higher
cash balances in our deposit accounts.
|
|
|
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit |
Income tax expense increased from zero in fiscal 2004 to
approximately $0.2 million in fiscal 2005 as a result of
alternative minimum taxes due to the U.S. federal
government as well as various state income taxes.
41
Total revenues increased $16.8 million, or 38%, from
$44.4 million in fiscal 2003 to $61.2 million in
fiscal 2004.
Software Revenue. Software revenue increased
$10.0 million, or 34%, from $29.5 million in fiscal
2003 to $39.5 million in fiscal 2004. Software revenue
represented 66% of our total revenues in fiscal 2003 and 64% of
our total revenues in fiscal 2004. The increase in software
revenue was primarily the result of our addition of new
customers, broader acceptance of our software applications and
increased sales through our direct channels and by our resellers
and original equipment manufacturers. Movements in foreign
exchange rates accounted for $1.6 million of the
$10.0 million increase in software revenue.
Services Revenue. Services revenue increased
$6.9 million, or 47%, from $14.8 million in fiscal
2003 to $21.8 million in fiscal 2004. Services revenue
represented 33% of our total revenues in fiscal 2003 and 36% of
our total revenues in fiscal 2004. The increase in services
revenue was primarily due to an increase in customer support
agreements that accompany sales of software to new customers. In
addition, revenue from assessment and design services,
installation services and training increased as a result of
higher sales. Movements in foreign exchange rates accounted for
$0.6 million of the $6.9 million increase in services
revenue.
Hardware, Supplies and Other Revenue. Hardware, supplies
and other revenue decreased $0.1 million, or 100%, from
$0.1 million in fiscal 2003 to zero in fiscal 2004. The
decrease was the result of our decision in September 2001 to
phase out the sale of our Vault 98 products, which included
third party hardware.
Total cost of revenues increased $2.1 million, or 30%, from
$7.1 million in fiscal 2003 to $9.2 million in fiscal
2004. Total cost of revenues represented 16% of our total
revenues in fiscal 2003 and 15% of our total revenues in fiscal
2004.
Cost of Software Revenue. Cost of software revenue
increased $0.2 million, or 25%, from $0.9 million in
fiscal 2003 to $1.2 million in fiscal 2004. Cost of
software revenue represented 3% of our total software revenue in
both fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2004. The increase in cost of
software revenue was primarily the result of higher third party
costs associated with higher software revenue.
Cost of Services Revenue. Cost of services revenue
increased $2.0 million, or 32%, from $6.1 million in
fiscal 2003 to $8.0 million in fiscal 2004. Cost of
services revenue represented 41% of our total services revenue
in fiscal 2003 and 37% of our total services revenue in fiscal
2004. The increase in cost of services revenue was the result of
increased headcount and other costs of providing customer
support and other professional services, which was the result of
increased sales.
Cost of Hardware, Supplies and Other Revenue. Cost of
hardware, supplies and other revenue decreased
$0.1 million, or 100%, from $0.1 million in fiscal
2003, or 76% of hardware, supplies and other revenue, to zero in
fiscal 2004. The decrease was the result of our decision in
September 2001 to phase out the sale of our Vault 98 products,
which included third party hardware.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses
increased $7.7 million, or 26%, from $29.8 million in
fiscal 2003 to $37.6 million in fiscal 2004. The increase
was primarily due to higher headcount and increased commission,
travel and entertainment expenses on higher revenue levels.
Movements in foreign exchange rates accounted for
$1.3 million of the $7.7 million increase in sales and
marketing expenses.
42
Research and Development. Research and development
expenses remained at $16.2 million from fiscal 2003 to
fiscal 2004. Expenses included higher legal fees primarily
associated with our intellectual property offset by a decrease
in employee compensation due to a slight reduction in headcount.
General and Administrative. General and administrative
expenses increased $2.3 million, or 36%, from
$6.3 million in fiscal 2003 to $8.6 million in fiscal
2004. The increase was primarily due to higher accounting and
legal fees along with increased employee compensation associated
with higher headcount.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation expense
decreased $0.4 million, or 20%, from $1.8 million in
fiscal 2003 to $1.4 million in fiscal 2004. The decrease
was a result of certain fixed assets becoming fully depreciated
as most of our equipment is in our development laboratory and is
depreciated over a three-year period.
Interest income decreased $0.2 million from
$0.3 million in fiscal 2003 to $0.1 million in fiscal
2004. The decrease was due to declining interest rates partially
offset by higher cash balances in our deposit accounts.
|
|
|
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit |
Beginning in fiscal 2000, we became eligible to participate in a
special tax incentive program offered by the State of New Jersey
that allowed participants to sell operating losses to eligible
buyers. Income tax benefits resulting from this program
decreased from $0.1 million in fiscal 2003 to zero in
fiscal 2004.
Seasonality
As is typical for many software companies, our business is
seasonal. Customer orders are generally higher in the first
calendar quarter (our fourth fiscal quarter) and lower in the
second calendar quarter (our first fiscal quarter). In addition,
we typically see a decline in customer orders in the third
calendar quarter (our second fiscal quarter) due to a reduction
in purchases from Europe in such quarter due to summer holidays.
These seasonal trends may cause our results of operations to
vary from quarter to quarter. Predictability of these seasonal
trends has varied somewhat in recent years.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have financed our operations to date primarily through the
private placements of preferred equity securities and common
stock as described below and, to a much lesser extent, through
funds from operations. As of
December 31, 2005, we had
$43.3 million of cash and cash equivalents. The cumulative
amount of preferred equity financing to date is
$141.3 million, of which approximately $25.0 million
was paid to Lucent in connection with the 1996 purchase of the
CommVault business. The remaining proceeds from all equity
financings to date have been used to provide working capital to
fund our growth, which includes the costs associated with
transitioning from the Vault 98 platform to QiNetix.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $0.9 million
in fiscal 2004, $3.8 million in fiscal 2005 and
$20.2 million in the nine months ended
December 31,
2005. In fiscal 2005 and the nine months ended
December 31,
2005, cash generated by operating activities was primarily due
to net income adjusted for the impact of depreciation and an
increase in deferred services revenue. In fiscal 2004, cash
generated by operating activities was primarily the result of an
increase in deferred revenue offset by our net loss for that
year.
Net cash used in investing activities was $1.2 million in
fiscal 2004, $1.9 million in fiscal 2005 and
$1.8 million in the nine months ended
December 31,
2005. Cash used in investing activities in each period was due
to purchases of property and equipment.
43
Net cash provided by financing activities was $15.4 million
in fiscal 2004, and minimal in both fiscal 2005 and in the nine
months ended
December 31, 2005. In fiscal 2004, cash
provided by financing activities was primarily attributable to
net proceeds from the issuance of convertible preferred stock.
Working capital increased $0.3 million from
$13.2 million as of
March 31, 2004 to
$13.4 million as of
March 31, 2005, primarily due to
cash generated as a result of $0.5 million in net income
during fiscal 2005, a $2.8 million increase in accounts
receivable as a result of higher sales and a $1.1 million
decrease in accounts payable, partially offset by a
$3.4 million increase in deferred revenue during the fiscal
year ended
March 31, 2005. Deferred revenue, which is a
current liability, primarily represents amounts paid by
customers for services in advance of those services being
performed by us and subsequently will be recognized as services
revenue when earned.
Working capital increased $8.2 million from
$13.4 million as of
March 31, 2005 to
$21.6 million as of
December 31, 2005, primarily due
to cash generated as a result of $9.1 million in net income
and increases in deferred revenue of $6.9 million and
accrued liabilities of $1.9 million, partially offset by a
decrease in accounts receivable of $1.1 million due to
stronger collection efforts.
We intend to enter into a new $20 million term loan with
Silicon Valley Bank pursuant to which we intend to borrow
$ million
on or immediately prior to the closing date of this offering in
connection with the payments to the holders of our
Series A, B, C, D and E preferred stock. The term loan will
be secured by substantially all of our assets. Borrowings under
the term loan will bear interest at a rate equal to
30-day LIBOR
plus % with principal and interest
to be repaid in quarterly installments over a
24-month period. We
anticipate that the term loan will contain certain customary
covenants and events of default. We estimate the payments under
this term loan will be
$ million
in fiscal 2007,
$ million
in fiscal 2008 and
$ million
in fiscal 2009. The term loan will mature in fiscal 2009.
In connection with the offering, all of our outstanding
preferred stock will convert
into shares
of common stock. A summary of our private placements of
preferred stock (and, in the case of the Series A, B, C, D
and E preferred stock, common stock that we issued concurrently
therewith) is set forth below:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Preferred | |
|
|
| Date of Financing |
|
Stock Series | |
|
Amount | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
(In millions) | |
|
May 1996
|
|
|
A |
|
|
$ |
30.7 |
|
|
July 1997
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
December 1997
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
October 1998
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
March 1999
|
|
|
E |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
April 2000
|
|
|
AA |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
December 2000
|
|
|
BB |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
February 2002
|
|
|
CC |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
September 2003
|
|
|
CC |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
141.3 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, we issued approximately $0.7 million of
Series D preferred stock to
N. Robert Hammer, our Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer, in the form of stock in
lieu of cash compensation for his services as chief executive
officer for the period from December 1998 to December 2000. Such
stock compensation was expensed during the same period.
44
Upon the closing of the offering, our Series A, B, C, D and
E preferred stock will be converted
into shares
of our common stock and will also have the right to receive:
|
|
|
| |
• |
$14.85 per share, or $47.0 million in the aggregate;
and |
| |
| |
• |
accumulated and unpaid dividends of $1.788 per share per
year since the date the shares of preferred stock were issued,
or
$ million
in the aggregate, assuming that this offering closes
on 2006. |
We intend to use the net proceeds from the sale of shares by us
of
$ million
(based on an offering price of
$ per
share, the midpoint of the estimated price range shown on the
cover of this prospectus), together with proceeds of
$ million
from the concurrent private placement (based on an offering
price of
$ per
share, the midpoint of the estimated price range shown on the
cover of this prospectus) and borrowings of
$ million
under our new term loan, to pay
$ million
in satisfaction of amounts due on our Series A, B, C, D and
E preferred stock upon its conversion into common stock.
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of
$ per
share would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this
offering and the concurrent private placement by
$ million
and would decrease (increase) the amount of borrowings on the
closing date under our new term loan by
$ million,
assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after
deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
The outstanding shares of Series AA, BB and CC preferred
stock will be converted into a total
of shares
of common stock.
We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and
borrowings under our new term loan will be sufficient to meet
our anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital
expenditures for at least the next 12 months. We cannot
assure you that this will be the case or that our assumptions
regarding revenues and expenses underlying this belief will be
accurate. We may seek additional funding through public or
private financings or other arrangements during this period.
Adequate funds may not be available when needed or may not be
available on terms favorable to us, or at all. If additional
funds are raised by issuing equity securities, dilution to
existing stockholders will result. If we raise additional funds
by obtaining loans from third parties, the terms of those
financing arrangements may include negative covenants or other
restrictions on our business that could impair our operational
flexibility, and would also require us to fund additional
interest expense. If funding is insufficient at any time in the
future, we may be unable to develop or enhance our products or
services, take advantage of business opportunities or respond to
competitive pressures, any of which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Summary Disclosures about Contractual Obligations and
Commercial Commitments
Our material capital commitments consist of obligations under
facilities and operating leases. We anticipate that we will
experience an increase in our capital expenditures and lease
commitments consistent with our anticipated growth in
operations, infrastructure and personnel and additional
resources devoted to building our brand name and marketing and
sales force.
We generally do not enter into binding purchase commitments. The
following table summarizes our existing obligations as of
December 31, 2005 with regards to payments due under
operating leases and an equipment term loan (dollars in
thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Payments Due By March 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| Contractual Obligations(1) |
|
Total | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
2010 | |
|
Thereafter | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Operating leases
|
|
$ |
5,906 |
|
|
$ |
683 |
|
|
$ |
2,424 |
|
|
$ |
2,136 |
|
|
$ |
649 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
Equipment term loan
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
5,923 |
|
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
$ |
2,424 |
|
|
$ |
2,136 |
|
|
$ |
649 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
| (1) |
In connection with this offering, we intend to enter into a new
$20 million term loan pursuant to which we intend to borrow
$ million
on or immediately prior to the closing date of this offering. We
estimate the payments under this term loan will be
$ million
in fiscal 2007,
$ million
in fiscal 2008 and
$ million
in fiscal 2009. The term loan will mature in fiscal 2009. |
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of
$ per
share would (decrease) increase our borrowings under our new
term loan on the closing date and would (decrease) increase the
payments under this term loan in fiscal 2007 by
$ ,
in fiscal 2008 by
$ ,
and in fiscal 2009 by
$ ,
assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus, remains the same.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Indemnifications
Our software licensing agreements contain certain provisions
that indemnify our customers from any claim, suit or proceeding
arising from alleged or actual intellectual property
infringement. These provisions continue in perpetuity along with
our software licensing agreements. We have never incurred a
liability relating to one of these indemnification provisions in
the past and we believe that the likelihood of any future payout
relating to these provisions is remote. Therefore, we have not
recorded a liability during any period related to these
indemnification provisions.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(
“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting
Changes and Error Corrections — a replacement of APB
Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3
(
“SFAS No. 154”). SFAS No. 154 applies to
all voluntary changes in accounting principles and changes the
requirements for accounting for and reporting of a change in
accounting principles. SFAS No. 154 is effective for
accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal
years beginning after
December 15, 2005. Earlier
application is permitted for accounting changes and corrections
of errors made in fiscal years beginning after
June 1,
2005. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 154 to
have a material impact on our financial position or results of
operations.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment (
“SFAS No.
123(R)”), which replaces SFAS No. 123 and
supersedes APB Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees. SFAS No. 123(R) addresses the
accounting for transactions in which an enterprise receives
employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of
the enterprise or (b) liabilities that are based on the
fair value of the enterprise’s equity instruments or that
may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments.
SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to
employees, including grants of employee stock options and
restricted stock grants, to be recognized as a compensation cost
based on their fair values. The pro forma disclosures previously
permitted under SFAS No. 123 no longer will be an
alternative to financial statement recognition. We will adopt
SFAS No. 123(R) on
April 1, 2006 using the
modified prospective approach and expect that the adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R) will have a material impact on our
consolidated results of operations, although it will not impact
our overall financial position. The future results will be
impacted by the number and value of additional stock option
grants subsequent to adoption and the rate of cancellation of
unvested grants. We estimate that we will record additional
stock-based compensation expense of approximately
$4.1 million in fiscal 2007 and approximately
$3.4 million in fiscal 2008 under SFAS No. 123(R)
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing method based on existing
unvested options as of
April 1, 2006. Our stock-based
compensation expenses will increase when additional stock option
grants are awarded.
46
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As of
December 31, 2005, our cash and cash equivalents
balance consisted primarily of money market funds. Due to the
short-term nature of these investments, we are not subject to
any material interest rate risk on these balances.
As a global company, we face exposure to adverse movements in
foreign currency exchange rates. Our international sales are
generally denominated in foreign currencies, and this revenue
could be materially affected by currency fluctuations.
Approximately 28% of our sales were outside the United States in
the nine months ended
December 31, 2005. Our primary
exposures are to fluctuations in exchange rates for the
U.S. dollar versus the Euro and, to a lesser extent, the
Australian dollar, British pound sterling, Canadian dollar and
Chinese yuan. Changes in currency exchange rates could adversely
affect our reported revenues and require us to reduce our prices
to remain competitive in foreign markets, which could also have
a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Historically, we have periodically reviewed and revised the
pricing of our products available to our customers in foreign
countries and we have not maintained excess cash balances in
foreign accounts. To date, we have not hedged our exposure to
changes in foreign currency exchange rates and, as a result,
could incur unanticipated gains or losses.
We estimate that a 10% change in foreign exchange rates would
impact our reported operating profit by less than
$1.0 million annually. In addition, we have
U.S. dollar denominated intercompany receivables due from
our foreign
subsidiaries that are subject to movements in
foreign exchange rates and, as a result, could incur
unanticipated transaction gains or losses. We anticipate that a
10% change in foreign exchange rates applied to such
intercompany receivables would impact our reported operating
profit by $2.0 million annually. This sensitivity analysis
disregards the possibilities that rates can move in opposite
directions and that losses from one geographic area may be
offset by gains from another geographic area.
47
BUSINESS
Company Overview
CommVault is a leading provider of data management software
applications and related services. We develop, market and sell a
unified suite of data management software applications under the
QiNetix (pronounced “kinetics”) brand. QiNetix is
specifically designed to protect and manage data throughout its
lifecycle in less time, at lower cost and with fewer resources
than alternative solutions while minimizing the cost and
complexity of managing that data. QiNetix provides our customers
with:
|
|
| • |
high-performance data protection, including backup and recovery; |
| |
| • |
disaster recovery of data; |
| |
| • |
data migration and archiving; |
| |
| • |
global availability of data; |
| |
| • |
replication of data; |
| • |
creation and management of copies of stored data; |
| |
| • |
storage resource discovery and usage tracking; |
| |
| • |
data classification; and |
| |
| • |
management and operational reports and troubleshooting tools. |
Our products and capabilities enable our customers to deploy
solutions for data protection, business continuance, corporate
compliance and centralized management and reporting. We also
provide our customers with a broad range of highly effective
professional services that are delivered by our worldwide
support and field operations.
QiNetix enables our customers to simply and cost-effectively
protect and manage their enterprise data throughout its
lifecycle, from data center to remote office, covering the
leading operating systems, relational databases and
applications. In addition to addressing today’s data
management challenges, our customers can realize lower capital
costs through more efficient use of their enterprise-wide
storage infrastructure assets, including the automated movement
of data from higher cost to lower cost storage devices
throughout its lifecycle and through sharing and better
utilization of storage resources across the enterprise. QiNetix
can also provide our customers with reduced operating costs
through a variety of features, including fast application
deployment, reduced training time, lower cost of storage media
consumables, proactive monitoring and analysis, simplified
troubleshooting and lower administrative costs.
QiNetix is built upon a new innovative architecture and a single
underlying code base that consists of:
|
|
|
| |
• |
an indexing engine that systematically identifies and organizes
all data, users and devices accessible to our software products; |
| |
| |
• |
a cataloging engine that contains a global database describing
the nature of all data, such as the users, applications and
storage with which it is associated; |
| |
| |
• |
a policy engine that enables customers to set rules to automate
the management of data; |
| |
| |
• |
a data movement engine that transports data using network
communication protocols; and |
| |
| |
• |
a media management engine that controls and catalogs disk, tape
and optical storage devices, as well as the data written to them. |
We refer to this single, unified code base underlying each of
our QiNetix applications as our Common Technology Engine. Each
data management software application within our QiNetix suite is
designed to be
best-in-class and is
fully integrated into our Common Technology Engine. Our unified
architectural design is unique and differentiates our products
from those of our competitors, some of whom offer similar
applications built upon disparate underlying software
architectures, which we refer to as point products. We believe
the disparate underlying software architectures of their
products inhibit our competitors’ ability to match the
seamless management, interoperability and scalability of our
internally developed unified suite and common user interface.
48
We have established a worldwide multi-channel distribution
network to sell our software and services to large global
enterprises, small and medium sized businesses and government
agencies, both directly through our sales force and indirectly
through our global network of value-added reseller partners,
systems integrators, corporate resellers and original equipment
manufacturers. Our original equipment manufacturer partners
include Dell, Hitachi Data Systems and Incentra Solutions, Inc.
As of
December 31, 2005, we had licensed our data
management software to more than 3,400 registered customers.
CommVault’s executive management team has led the growth of
our business, including the development and release of all our
QiNetix software since its introduction in February 2000. Under
the guidance of our management team, we have sustained technical
leadership with the introduction of eight new data management
applications and have garnered numerous industry awards and
recognition for our innovative solutions.
Industry Background
The driving forces for the growth of the data management
software industry are the rapid growth of data and the need to
protect and manage that data.
Data is widely considered to be one of an organization’s
most valued assets. The increasing reliance on critical
enterprise software applications such as
e-mail, relational
databases, enterprise resource planning, customer relationship
management and workgroup collaboration tools is resulting in the
rapid growth of data across all enterprises. New government
regulations, such as those issued under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act (HIPAA) and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
(Basel II), as well as company policies requiring data
preservation, are expanding the proportion of data that must be
archived and easily accessible for future use. In addition,
ensuring the security and integrity of the data has become a
critical task as regulatory compliance and corporate governance
objectives affecting many organizations mandate the creation of
multiple copies of data with longer and more complex retention
requirements. According to a 2005 report by International Data
Corporation, an independent technology research organization,
worldwide disk storage systems exceeded 1.2 million
terabytes in 2004 and are forecasted to grow to nearly
10.6 million terabytes in 2009, representing an estimated
annual growth rate of approximately 52%.
In addition to rapid data growth, data storage has transitioned
from being server-attached to becoming widely distributed across
local and global networked storage systems. Data previously
stored on primary disk and backed up on tape is increasingly
being backed up, managed and stored on a broader array of
storage tiers ranging from high-cost, high-performance disk
systems to lower-cost mid-range and low-end disk systems to tape
libraries. This transition has been driven by the growth of
data, the pervasive use of distributed critical enterprise
software applications, the decrease in disk cost and the demand
for 24/7 business continuity.
The recent innovations in storage and networking technologies,
coupled with the rapid growth of data, have caused information
technology managers to redesign their data and storage
infrastructures to deliver greater efficiency, broaden access to
data and reduce costs. The result has been the wide adoption of
larger and more complex networked data and storage solutions,
such as storage area networks (SANs) and network-attached
storage (NAS). In addition to those trends, regulatory
compliance and corporate governance objectives are creating
larger data archives having much longer retention periods that
require information technology managers of organizations
affected by these objectives to ensure the integrity, security
and availability of data.
We believe that these trends are increasing the demand for
software applications that can simplify data management, provide
secure and reliable access to all data across a broad spectrum
of tiered storage and computing systems and seamlessly scale to
accommodate growth, while reducing the total cost of ownership
to the customer. Gartner, Inc., an independent technology
research organization, estimated in 2005 that the storage
management software market will grow from $5.6 billion in
2004 to $9.4 billion in 2009.
49
Limitations of Competing Data Management Software Products
and Solutions
Many of our competitors’ products were initially designed
to manage smaller quantities of data in server-attached storage
environments. As a result, we believe they are not as effective
managing data in today’s larger and more complex networked
(SAN and NAS) environments. Given these limitations, we believe
our competitors’ products cannot be scaled as easily as
ours and are more costly to implement and manage than our
solutions.
Most data management software solutions are comprised of many
individual point products built upon separate underlying
architectures. This often requires the user to administer each
individual point product using a separate, different user
interface, and unique set of dedicated storage resources, such
as disk and tape drives. The result can be a costly, difficult
to manage environment that requires extensive administrative
cross-training, offers little insight into storage resource use
across the global enterprise, provides modest operational
reporting and commands greater storage use. As a result, we
believe competing data management software products do not fully
address the following key requirements in today’s data
management environment:
|
|
|
| |
• |
Effective Management of Widely Distributed and Networked
Data. Most existing data management software products were
designed to manage local server-attached storage environments,
and do not as easily or effectively manage data in today’s
heterogeneous, widely distributed and tiered storage
architectures. |
| |
| |
• |
Ease of Data Management Application Integration. A number
of vendors offering point products have attempted to address
distributed and networked storage management requirements, but
these disparate products are not easily integrated with other
data management applications and can result in additional costs
to the user, including storage infrastructure costs and higher
implementation, training, administration, maintenance and
support costs. |
| |
| |
• |
Global Scalability. Data management solutions consisting
of combinations of point products initially designed to address
server-attached storage environments have underlying software
architectures that are both cumbersome to deploy and more
difficult to scale across networked storage and geographic
boundaries. |
| |
| |
• |
Centralized Data Management. Most data management
solutions consisting of combinations of point products lack the
ability to comprehensively manage all data management
applications across the global enterprise from a single, unified
point of control. |
| |
| |
• |
Ability to Effectively Prioritize Stored Data Across
Applications. Several existing solutions include
combinations of point products that attempt to manage data based
on its assigned priority in a tiered storage environment.
However, these offerings lack a specifically designed tiered
storage management architecture that can seamlessly integrate
the classification, indexing and cataloging of data with
features that enable user-defined policies and automated
migration of data across a tiered storage environment. |
| |
| |
• |
Lower Total Cost of Ownership. The inherent limitations
of many data management software products can result in
increased capital and operating costs. These costs are related
to the increased use of storage hardware and media, additional
infrastructure requirements (such as servers and storage network
devices) and higher personnel costs, including implementation,
training, administration, maintenance and support. |
We believe that there is and will continue to be significant
demand for a unified, comprehensive and scalable suite of data
management software applications specifically designed to
centrally and cost-effectively manage increasingly complex
enterprise data environments.
Our Solution
We provide our customers with a unified, comprehensive and
scalable suite of data management software applications that are
fully integrated into our Common Technology Engine. Our software
enables
50
centralized protection and management of globally distributed
data while reducing the total cost of managing, moving, storing
and assuring secure access to that data from a single
browser-based interface. QiNetix provides our customers with
high-performance data protection, including backup and recovery,
disaster recovery of data, data migration and archiving, global
data availability, replication of data, creation and management
of copies of stored data, storage resource discovery and usage
tracking, data classification, management and operational
reports and troubleshooting tools.
QiNetix fully interoperates with a wide variety of operating
systems, applications, network devices, protocols, storage
arrays, storage formats and tiered storage infrastructures,
providing our customers with the flexibility to purchase and
deploy a combination of hardware and software from different
vendors. As a result, our customers can purchase and use the
optimal hardware and software for their needs, rather than being
restricted to the offerings of a single vendor. Key benefits of
our software and related services include:
|
|
|
| |
• |
Dynamic Management of Widely Distributed and Networked
Data. QiNetix is specifically designed to optimize
management of data on tiered storage and widely distributed data
environments, including SAN and NAS. Our architecture enables
the creation of policies that automate the movement of data
based on business goals for availability, recoverability and
disaster tolerance. User-defined policies determine the storage
media on which data should reside based on its assigned value. |
| |
| |
• |
Unified Suite of Applications Built upon a Common Technology
Engine. All QiNetix applications share common components of
our underlying software code, which drives significant cost
savings versus the point products or loosely integrated
solutions offered by our competitors. In addition, we believe
that each of the individual data management applications in our
QiNetix suite delivers superior performance, functionality and
total cost of ownership benefits. These solutions can be
delivered to our customers either as part of our unified suite
or as stand-alone applications. We also believe that our
architecture will allow us to more rapidly introduce new
applications that will enable us to expand beyond our current
addressable market. |
| |
| |
• |
Global Scalability and Seamless Centralized Data
Management. Our software is highly scalable, enabling our
customers to keep pace with the growth of data and technologies
deployed in their enterprises. We use the same underlying
software architecture for large global enterprise, small and
medium sized business and government agency deployments. We
offer a centralized, browser-based management console from which
policies automatically move data according to users’ needs
for data access, availability and cost objectives. With QiNetix,
our customers can automate the discovery, management and
monitoring of enterprise-wide storage resources and applications. |
| |
| |
• |
State-of-the-Art
Customer Support Services. We offer 24/7 global technical
support. Our support operations center at our Oceanport, New
Jersey headquarters is complemented by local support resources,
including centers in Europe, Australia, India and China. Our
worldwide customer support organization provides comprehensive
local and remote customer care to effectively address issues in
today’s complex storage networking infrastructures. Our
customer support process includes the expertise of product
development, field and customer support engineers. In addition,
we incorporate into our software many self-diagnostic and
troubleshooting capabilities and provide automated web-based
support capabilities to our customers. Furthermore, we have
implemented a voice-over-IP telephony system to tie our
worldwide support centers together with an integrated call
center messaging and trouble ticket management system. |
| |
| |
• |
Superior Professional Services. We are committed to
providing high-value, superior professional services to our
customers. Our Global Professional Services group provides
complete business solutions that complement our software sales
and improve the overall user experience. Our
end-to-end services
include assessment and design, implementation, post-deployment
and training services. These services help our customers improve
the protection, disaster recovery, availability, security and
regulatory compliance of their global data assets while
minimizing the overall cost and complexity of their data
infrastructures. |
51
|
|
|
| |
• |
Lower Total Cost of Ownership. Our software solutions
built on our QiNetix architecture enable our customers to
realize compelling total cost of ownership benefits, including
reduced capital costs, operating expenses and support costs. |
Our Strategy
Our objective is to enhance our position as a leading supplier
of data management software and services. Our key strategic
initiatives are to continue:
|
|
|
| |
• |
Extending our Technology Leadership, Product Breadth and
Addressable Markets. We intend to use our technology base,
internal development capabilities and strategic industry
relationships to extend our technology leadership in providing
software to manage globally distributed data. Specifically, we
plan to continuously enhance existing software applications and
introduce new data management software applications that address
emerging data and storage management trends. In addition, we
intend to build upon our existing technology foundation to
introduce new software applications beyond the traditional data
and storage management category, which may expand our
addressable market. |
| |
| |
• |
Enhancing and Expanding our Customer Support and Other
Professional Services Offerings. We plan to continue
investing in the people, partners, technologies, software and
services enhancements necessary to provide our customers with
the industry’s most comprehensive product support and
professional services. We intend to continue creating and
delivering innovative services offerings and product
enhancements that result in faster deployment of our software,
simpler system administration and rapid resolution of problems.
We also intend to enhance our web-based support initiatives and
broaden our global support infrastructure. |
| |
| |
• |
Expanding Distribution Channels and Geographic Markets
Served. We plan to continue investing in the expansion of
our distribution channels, both geographically and across all
enterprises. We intend to maintain and grow our direct sales
force as well as our distribution relationships, including those
with value-added resellers, corporate resellers, systems
integrators and original equipment manufacturers. We have made
significant investments to extend our global reach, such as
establishing sales and support offices in China and a
development and support office in India. We intend to continue
making investments to extend our global reach and increase our
distribution throughout the Americas, Europe, Australia and Asia. |
| |
| |
• |
Broadening and Developing Strategic Relationships. We
plan to broaden our distribution and technology partnerships to
increase existing product sales and introduce new applications.
Our unified platform simplifies integration with our
partners’ solutions and the implementation of unique
functionality to meet their needs. We also intend to broaden our
existing relationships and develop new relationships with
leading technology partners, including software application and
infrastructure hardware vendors. We believe that these types of
strategic relationships will allow us to package and distribute
our data management software to our partners’ customers,
increase sales of our software through joint-selling and
marketing arrangements and increase our insight into future
industry trends. |
52
Products
Our QiNetix suite is comprised of eight distinct data management
software applications, all of which share our Common Technology
Engine. Each application can be used individually or in
combination with other applications of our unified suite. The
following table summarizes the components of our unified QiNetix
suite:
| |
|
|
| QiNetix Suite of Data Management Applications |
|
Functionality |
| |
|
|
| |
|
• Galaxy Backup and Recovery
|
|
High-performance backup and restoration of enterprise data |
|
• QuickRecovery
|
|
Recovery of files and applications by taking advantage of
snapshot technologies |
|
• ContinuousDataReplicator*
|
|
Continuous capture of changes to data and copying of those
changes to a secondary location for disaster recovery and fast
recovery of individual files |
|
• DataMigrator
|
|
Active migration and archiving of data to less expensive
secondary storage indexed for search and retrieval |
|
• DataArchiver
|
|
Archiving and indexing of e-mail messages and attachments for
compliance and legal discovery purposes |
|
• Data Classification
|
|
Creation of a catalog of key attributes about primary data to
enable intelligent, automated policy-based data movement and
management |
|
• StorageManager
|
|
Storage resource discovery and usage tracking of applications,
files, organizations and individual users |
|
• QNet
|
|
Consolidated management and reporting on data management service
levels and data movement operations |
* Beta only.
|
|
|
QiNetix Galaxy Backup and Recovery |
QiNetix Galaxy provides high-performance backup of enterprise
applications and data for restoration when information is
accidentally deleted, when disks fail, when servers need to be
rebuilt or for disaster recovery of servers. Policies define
when and how data is protected and stored, providing efficient
use of storage devices and media, including drive and device
sharing.
QiNetix QuickRecovery recovers application data and files from
disks to minimize disruption of a customer’s operations.
Using snapshot technologies to create one or more
point-in-time recovery
images, QuickRecovery offers users the ability to rapidly
recover data from alternative points in time. The software
incorporates block-level data movement and features a simple
interface that creates, tracks, administers and manages
point-in-time snapshots
of data for testing, recovery and/or business continuance.
|
|
|
QiNetix ContinuousDataReplicator (beta only) |
QiNetix ContinuousDataReplicator (beta only) continuously
captures file-level changes to data and copies those changes to
a secondary system to protect from disk, server or site loss.
The software retains multiple
point-in-time copies of
the data at the secondary location, offering flexible recovery
options back to the primary location. ContinuousDataReplicator
(beta only) reduces risk of lost data and can simplify a
customer’s operations by centralizing data from many remote
office locations into a single location, leveraging systems and
personnel expertise rather than having to duplicate resources at
every location.
53
QiNetix DataMigrator actively moves less-used or older data from
higher-cost primary storage to less expensive secondary storage
and indexes it for search and retrieval purposes without
disrupting how applications or end users access information. By
shrinking the amount of data stored on primary storage,
DataMigrator can also reduce the amount of time needed for
backup and information technology administration, while
improving computing system performance. A single, comprehensive
capacity management solution for Windows, UNIX, Linux, Microsoft
Exchange, Novell Netware and other environments, DataMigrator
can help reduce capital expenditures on new primary storage.
QiNetix DataArchiver archives and indexes
e-mail messages and
attachments to help organizations meet compliance, regulatory
and legal discovery requirements. The software offers extensive
search capabilities to rapidly locate and retrieve
e-mail messages.
Full-text indexing and keyword searching allows administrators
and compliance officers to find and retrieve
e-mail messages by
searching e-mail header
data along with message and attachment content.
|
|
|
QiNetix Data Classification |
QiNetix Data Classification creates a catalog of key attributes
of unstructured data stored on primary computing systems,
complementing the indexing of applications and data on secondary
storage resources provided by other QiNetix applications. The
software enhances how administrators can manage data by offering
a broad set of attributes, instead of just its physical
location. Data Classification helps enterprises more precisely
organize and manage tiered classes of data throughout its
lifecycle. Currently, Data Classification can only be used in
combination with our other products.
QiNetix StorageManager discovers, tracks and reports on primary
disk storage by users, enterprises, files and applications. Its
comprehensive view of hosts, applications and storage resources
provides detailed reports on disk storage assets, usage, trends
and costs. The software also offers the ability to view links
between logical entities (such as applications and files) and
physical storage resources. StorageManager enables enterprises
to better use storage resources that they already have, as well
as plan ahead for future needs.
QiNetix QNet consolidates management and reporting of data
management service levels and data movement operations within a
single browser interface. QNet collects information from our
data management applications and can correlate it to primary and
secondary storage use, including data characteristics, giving an
end-to-end lifecycle
view of data. In addition, QNet can project secondary storage
resource consumption, enabling users to determine if they have
sufficient storage capacity and help plan for future needs. The
software also provides operational reports detailing performance
versus operation service level objectives.
Our QiNetix suite includes intelligent operations management
capabilities (iQ Ops) to simplify the management of complex data
and network and storage information technology operations. iQ
Ops provides proactive and reactive monitoring and reporting
functions, alert notification and analysis enabling customers to
quickly detect, troubleshoot and resolve potential problems.
Combined with the reliability and resiliency features of our
Common Technology Engine, iQ Ops enables our customers to
improve overall operations with higher system availability.
CommVault and our QiNetix applications have received numerous
industry awards and recognition. In July 2005, CommVault was
placed in the “Leaders Quadrant” of the Gartner
Enterprise Backup/Recovery software market Magic Quadrant. Also
in 2005, our Galaxy software earned top rating over its
54
direct competitors and was awarded the Diogenes Labs-Storage
magazine Quality Award in the enterprise backup and recovery
software category. In 2004, our QiNetix suite was voted
“most innovative software” and in 2005, the “best
solution” by senior IT executives at the Midsize Enterprise
Summit. Storage magazine and SearchStorage.com named our QiNetix
suite as the 2003 “Product of the Year” for Backup and
Disaster Recovery Software. Storage magazine and
SearchStorage.com similarly named our Galaxy software the 2002
“Product of the Year” for Backup and Disaster Recovery
Software. In 2003, our software applications were named by
Network Magazine as “Best Backup/Recovery Software Product
of the Year” and by eWEEK and PC Magazine as “Best of
Show Enterprise Storage” at the CeBit America trade show.
In 2002, our Galaxy software was named by Microsoft Certified
Professional Magazine as “Editor’s Choice: Products We
Love” for backup.
Services
A comprehensive global offering of customer support and other
professional services is critical to the successful marketing,
sale and deployment of our software. From planning to deployment
to operations, we offer a complete set of technical services,
training and support options that maximize the operational
benefits of our QiNetix suite. Our commitment to superior
customer support is reflected in the breadth and depth of our
services offerings as well as in our ongoing initiatives to
engineer resiliency, automation and serviceability features
directly into our products.
We have established a global customer support organization built
specifically to handle our expanding customer base. We offer
multiple levels of customer support that can be tailored to the
customer’s response needs and business sensitivities. Our
customer support services consist of:
|
|
|
| |
• |
Real-Time Support. Our support staff are available 24/7
by telephone to provide first response and manage the resolution
of customer issues. In addition to phone support, our customers
have access to an online product support database for help with
troubleshooting and operational questions. Innovative use of
web-based diagnostic tools provides problem analysis and
resolution often without the need for onsite support personnel.
Our software design is also an important element in our
comprehensive customer support, including “root cause”
problem analysis, intelligent alerting and troubleshooting
assistance. Our software is directly linked to our online
support database allowing customers to analyze problems without
engaging our technical support personnel. |
| |
| |
• |
Significant Network and Hardware Expertise. Our support
engineers have extensive knowledge of complex applications,
servers and networks. We proactively take ownership of the
customer’s problem, regardless of whether the issue is
directly related to our products or to those of another vendor.
We have also developed and maintain a knowledge library of
storage systems and software products to further enable our
support organization to quickly and effectively resolve customer
problems. |
| |
| |
• |
Global Operations. We are enhancing our Oceanport, New
Jersey support operations with a new
state-of-the-art
technical support center which will be operational in April
2006. We also have established key support operations in
Hyderabad, India, Oberhausen, Germany and Shanghai, China, which
are complemented by regional support centers in other worldwide
locations. Furthermore, we have implemented a voice-over-IP
telephony system to tie our worldwide support centers together
with an integrated call center messaging and trouble ticket
management system. We have designed our support infrastructure
to be able to scale with the increasing globalization of our
customers. |
We also provide a wide range of other professional services that
consist of:
|
|
|
| |
• |
Assessment and Design Services. Our assessment and design
services assist customers in determining data and storage
management requirements, designing solutions to meet those
requirements and planning for successful implementation and
deployment. |
| |
| |
• |
Implementation and Post-deployment Services. Our
professional services team helps customers efficiently
configure, install and deploy our QiNetix suite based on
specified business objectives. |
55
|
|
|
| |
|
Our SystemCare Review Services assist our customers with
assessing the post-deployment operational performance of our
QiNetix suite. |
| |
| |
• |
Training Services. We provide global onsite and offsite
training for our products. Packaged or customized customer
training courses are available in instructor-led or
computer-based formats. We offer in-depth training and
certification for our resellers in pre- and post-sales support
methodologies, including web access to customizable
documentation and training materials. |
Strategic Relationships
An important element of our strategy is to establish
relationships with third parties to assist us in developing,
marketing, selling and implementing our software and services.
We believe that strategic and technology-based relationships
with industry leaders are fundamental to our success. We have
forged numerous relationships with software application and
hardware vendors to enhance our combined capabilities and to
create the optimal combination of data management applications.
This approach enhances our ability to expand our product
offerings and customer base and to enter new markets. We have
established the following types of strategic relationships:
Product and Technology Relationships. We maintain
strategic product and technology relationships with major
industry leaders to ensure that our software applications are
integrated with, supported by and add value to our
partners’ hardware and software products. Collaboration
with these market leaders allows us to provide applications that
enable our customers to improve data management efficiency.
Our significant strategic relationships include Dell, Hitachi
Data Systems and Microsoft. In addition to these relationships,
we maintain relationships with a broad range of industry vendors
to verify and demonstrate the interoperability of our software
applications with their equipment and technologies. These
vendors include Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., Cisco
Systems, Inc., EMC, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Network Appliance,
Inc., Novell, Inc., Oracle Corporation and SAP AG.
Value-Added Reseller, Systems Integrator, Corporate Reseller
and Original Equipment Manufacturer Relationships. Our
corporate resellers bundle or sell our software applications
together with their own products, and our value-added resellers
resell our software applications independently. As of
December 31, 2005, we had over 300 reseller partners and
systems integrators distributing our software worldwide.
In order to broaden our market coverage, we have original
equipment manufacturer distribution agreements with Dell and
Hitachi Data Systems. Under these agreements, the original
equipment manufacturers sell, market and support our software
applications and services independently and/or incorporate our
software applications into their own hardware products. Our
original equipment manufacturer agreements do not contain any
minimum purchase or sale commitments. In addition to our
original equipment manufacturer agreement with Dell, we also
have a corporate reseller agreement with the Dell Software and
Peripherals division.
Customers
We sell our suite of data management software applications and
related services directly to large global enterprises, small and
medium sized businesses and government agencies, and indirectly
through value-added resellers, systems integrators, corporate
resellers and original equipment manufacturer partners. As of
December 31, 2005, we had licensed our software
applications to more than 3,400 registered customers in a broad
range of industries, including banking, insurance and financial
services, government, healthcare, pharmaceuticals and medical
services, technology, legal, manufacturing, utilities and
energy. Our customers include Ace Hardware Corporation, Centex
Homes, Clifford Chance LLP, Cozen O’Connor, Halcrow Group
Ltd., Newell Rubbermaid Inc., North Fork Bank, Ricoh Company,
Ltd., the United Kingdom’s Department of International
Development and Welch Foods Inc.
Sales through our original equipment manufacturer agreement and
our reseller agreement with Dell accounted for approximately 7%
and 11%, respectively, of our revenues for the nine months ended
December 31, 2005, and sales to the U.S. federal
government accounted for approximately 10% of our
56
revenues for the nine months ended
December 31, 2005. Dell
is an original equipment manufacturer and a reseller that
purchases software from us for resale to its customers, but is
not the end user of our software.
Technology
Our Common Technology Engine serves as a major differentiator
versus our competitors’ data management software products.
Our Common Technology Engine’s unique indexing, cataloging,
data movement, media management and policy technologies are the
source of the performance, scale, management, cost of ownership
benefits and seamless interoperability inherent in all of our
data management software applications. Additional options enable
content search, data encryption and auditing features to support
data discovery and compliance requirements. Each of these
applications shares a common architecture consisting of three
core components: intelligent agent software, data movement
software and command and control software. These components may
be installed on a single host server, or each may be distributed
over many servers in a global network. Additionally, the
modularity of our software provides deployment flexibility. The
ability to share storage resources across multiple data
management applications provides easier data management and
lower total cost of ownership. We participate in industry
standards groups and activities that we believe will have a
direct bearing on the data management software market.
Our software architecture consists of integrated software
components that are grouped together to form a CommCell.
Components of a CommCell are as follows:
|
|
|
| |
• |
one CommServe; |
| |
| |
• |
one or more MediaAgents; and |
| |
| |
• |
one or more iDataAgents. |
Each highly scalable CommCell may be configured to reflect a
customer’s geographic, organizational or application
environment. Multiple CommCells can be aggregated into a single,
centralized view for policy-based management across a
customer’s local or global information technology
environment.
|
|
|
| |
• |
CommServe. The CommServe acts as the command and control
center of the CommCell and handles all requests for activity
between MediaAgent and iDataAgent components. The CommServe
contains the centralized event and job managers and the index
catalog. This database includes information about where data
resides, such as the library, media and content of data. The
centralized event manager logs all events, providing unified
notification of important events. The job manager automates and
monitors all jobs across the CommCell. |
| |
| |
• |
MediaAgent. The MediaAgent is a media independent module
that is responsible for managing the movement of data between
the iDataAgents and the physical storage devices. Our
MediaAgents communicate with a broad range of storage devices,
generating an index for use by each of our QiNetix applications.
The MediaAgent software supports most storage devices, including
automated magnetic tape libraries, tape stackers and loaders,
standalone tape drives and magnetic storage devices,
magneto-optical libraries, virtual tape libraries, DVD-RAM and
CD-RW devices. |
| |
| |
• |
iDataAgent. The iDataAgent is a software module that
resides on the server or other computing device and controls the
data being protected, replicated, migrated or archived, often
referred to simply as the “client” software.
iDataAgents communicate with most open and network file systems
and enterprise relational databases and applications, such as
Microsoft Exchange, Microsoft SharePoint, Notes Domino Server,
GroupWise, Oracle, Informix, Sybase, DB2 and SAP, to generate
application aware indexes pertinent to granular recovery of
application objects. The agent software contains the logic
necessary to extract (or recover) data and send it to (or
receive it from) the MediaAgent software. |
57
Sales and Marketing
We sell our data and storage management software applications
and related services to large global enterprises, small and
medium sized businesses and government agencies. We sell through
our worldwide direct sales force and our global network of
value-added resellers, systems integrators, corporate resellers
and original equipment manufacturer partners. As of
December 31, 2005, we had 136 employees in sales and
marketing. These employees are located in the Americas, Europe,
Australia and Asia.
We have a variety of marketing programs designed to create brand
recognition and market awareness for our product offerings and
for sales lead generation. Our marketing efforts include active
participation at trade shows, technical conferences and
technology seminars; advertising; publication of technical and
educational articles in industry journals; sales training; and
preparation of competitive analyses. In addition, our strategic
partners augment our marketing and sales campaigns through
seminars, trade shows and joint advertising campaigns. Our
customers and strategic partners provide references and
recommendations that we often feature in our advertising and
promotional activities.
Research and Development
Our research and development organization is responsible for the
design, development, testing and certification of our data
management software applications. As of
December 31, 2005,
we had 167 employees in our research and development group,
of which 22 are located at our Hyderabad, India development
center. Our engineering efforts support product development
across all major operating systems, databases, applications and
network storage devices. A substantial amount of our development
effort goes into certification, integration and support of our
applications to ensure interoperability with our strategic
partners’ hardware and software products. We have also made
substantial investments in the automation of our product test
and quality assurance laboratories. We spent $13.9 million
on research and development activities for the nine months ended
December 31, 2005, $17.2 million in fiscal 2005,
$16.2 million in fiscal 2004 and $16.2 million in
fiscal 2003.
Competition
The data storage management market is intensely competitive,
highly fragmented and characterized by rapidly changing
technology and evolving standards. We currently compete with
other providers of data management software as well as large
storage hardware manufacturers that have developed or acquired
their own data management software products. These manufacturers
have the resources and capabilities to develop their own data
management software applications, and many have been making
acquisitions and broadening their efforts to include broader
data management and storage products. These manufacturers and/or
our other current and potential competitors may establish
cooperative relationships among themselves or with third
parties, creating new competitors or alliances. Large operating
system and application vendors, including Microsoft, have
introduced products or functionality that include some of the
same functions offered by our software applications. In the
future, further development by these vendors could cause our
software applications and services to become redundant.
The following are our primary competitors in the data management
software applications market, each of which has one or more
products that compete with a part of or all of our software
suite:
|
|
|
| |
• |
CA (formerly known as Computer Associates International, Inc.); |
| |
| |
• |
EMC; |
| |
| |
• |
Hewlett-Packard; |
| |
| |
• |
IBM; and |
| |
| |
• |
Symantec. |
The principal competitive factors in our industry include
product functionality, product integration, platform coverage,
ability to scale, price, worldwide sales infrastructure, global
technical support, name
58
recognition and reputation. The ability of major system vendors
to bundle hardware and software solutions is also a significant
competitive factor in our industry. Although many of our
competitors have greater resources, a larger installed customer
base and greater name recognition, we believe we compete
favorably on the basis of these competitive factors.
Intellectual Property and Proprietary Rights
Our success and ability to compete depend on our continued
development and protection of our proprietary software and other
technologies. We rely primarily on a combination of trade
secret, patent, copyright and trademark laws, as well as
contractual provisions, to establish and protect our
intellectual property rights. We provide our software to
customers pursuant to license agreements that impose
restrictions on use. These license agreements are primarily in
the form of shrink-wrap or click-wrap licenses, which are not
negotiated with or signed by our end user customers. These
measures may afford only limited protection of our intellectual
property and proprietary rights associated with our software. We
also enter into confidentiality agreements with employees and
consultants involved in product development. We routinely
require our employees, customers and potential business partners
to enter into confidentiality agreements before we disclose any
sensitive aspects of our software, technology or business plans.
As of
February 22, 2006, we had eight issued patents and 64
pending patent applications in the United States and 13 issued
patents and 65 pending patent applications in foreign countries.
As of
February 22, 2006, we also had 13 pending European
Patent applications with the European Patent Office which, if
allowed, may be converted into issued patents in various
European Contracting States. Additionally, as of
February 22, 2006, we had 14 pending patent applications
under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, which we may convert into
foreign patent applications in various Patent Cooperation Treaty
Contracting States within the time periods specified in the
treaty. Pending patent applications may receive unfavorable
examination and are not guaranteed allowance as issued patents.
We may elect to abandon or otherwise not pursue prosecution of
certain pending patent applications due to patent examination
results, economic considerations, strategic concerns or other
factors. We will continue to assess appropriate occasions to
seek patent and other intellectual property protection for
innovative aspects of our technology that we believe provide us
a significant competitive advantage.
Despite our efforts to protect our trade secrets and proprietary
rights through patents and license and confidentiality
agreements, unauthorized parties may still attempt to copy or
otherwise obtain and use our software and technology. In
addition, we intend to expand our international operations and
effective patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret
protection may not be available or may be limited in foreign
countries. If we fail to protect our intellectual property and
other proprietary rights, our business could be harmed.
We have entered into an original equipment manufacturer
agreement with Critical Technologies, Inc. whereby we embed
Critical Technologies’ indexing software in our software
applications for sale, as an option, to our customers. Our
agreement with Critical Technologies expires on
May 31,
2007 unless prior thereto either party gives at least
90 days notice of termination. In addition to our agreement
with Critical Technologies, we currently resell certain software
from Microsoft, including Microsoft SQL Server, used in
conjunction with our software applications pursuant to an
independent software vendor royalty license and distribution
agreement that we have and plan to continue renewing annually.
We also currently resell certain other software from Microsoft,
including Windows Preinstallation Environment software, used in
conjunction with our software applications, pursuant to an
agreement with Microsoft that expires
August 31, 2006. We
have entered into and expect to enter into agreements with
additional third parties to license their technology for use
with our software applications.
Some of the products or technologies acquired, licensed or
developed by us may incorporate so-called “open
source” software and we may incorporate open source
software into other products in the future. The use of such open
source software may ultimately subject some products to
unintended conditions which may negatively affect our business,
financial condition, operating results, cash flow and ability to
commercialize our products or technologies.
59
From time to time, we are participants or members of various
industry standard-setting organizations or other industry
technical organizations. Our participation or membership in such
organizations may, in some circumstances, require us to enter
into royalty or licensing agreements with third parties
regarding our intellectual property under terms established by
those organizations, which we may find unfavorable.
In the United States, we own or have common law trademark rights
in the following marks: CommVault, CommVault Systems, CommVault
Galaxy, QiNetix and Unified Data Management. We also have
several other trademarks and are actively pursuing trademark
registrations in several foreign jurisdictions.
Employees
As of
December 31, 2005, we had 575 employees
worldwide, including 136 in sales and marketing, 167 in research
and development, 76 in general administration and 196 in
services. None of our employees are represented by a labor
union. We have never experienced a work stoppage and believe our
relationship with our employees is satisfactory.
Facilities
Our principal administrative, sales, marketing, customer support
and research and development facility is located at our
headquarters in Oceanport, New Jersey. We currently occupy
approximately 115,000 square feet of office space in the
Oceanport facility under the terms of an operating lease
expiring in July 2008. We believe that our current facility is
adequate to meet our needs for at least the next 12 months.
We believe that suitable additional facilities will be available
as needed on commercially reasonable terms. In addition, we have
offices in the United States in Arizona, California, Florida,
Georgia, Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Texas,
Virginia and Washington; Ottawa, Ontario; Mississauga, Ontario;
Reading, United Kingdom; Oberhausen, Germany; Utrecht,
Netherlands; Beijing, China; Shanghai, China; Sydney, Australia;
Col. Marte, Mexico; and Hyderabad, India.
Legal Proceedings
From time to time we are involved in litigation arising in the
ordinary course of our business. We are not presently a party to
any litigation the outcome of which, if determined adversely to
us, would individually or in the aggregate have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations or
financial condition.
60
MANAGEMENT
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table presents information with respect to our
directors and executive officers as of
March 1, 2006:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
Alan G. Bunte
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
Ron Miiller
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
Vice President of Sales, Americas |
|
Anand Prahlad
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
Vice President, Product Development |
|
Suresh P. Reddy
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
Vice President, Worldwide Technical Services & Support |
|
David West
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
Vice President, Marketing and Business Development |
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
Director* |
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
Director |
|
Gary B. Smith(2)
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
| |
* |
Mr. Johnson will resign as a director immediately prior to
the closing of the offering. |
|
|
| (1) |
Member of the Audit Committee. |
| |
| (2) |
Member of the Nominations and Governance Committee. |
| |
| (3) |
Member of the Compensation Committee. |
N. Robert Hammer has served as our Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer since March 1998.
Mr. Hammer was also a venture partner of the Sprout Group,
an internal division of Credit Suisse First Boston Private
Equity, Inc., from 1997 until December 2003. Credit Suisse First
Boston Private Equity, Inc. is an affiliate of Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC, an underwriter in this offering. Prior to
joining the Sprout Group, Mr. Hammer served as the
chairman, president and chief executive officer of Norand
Corporation, a portable computer systems manufacturer, from 1988
until its acquisition by Western Atlas, Inc. in 1997.
Mr. Hammer led Norand following its leveraged buy-out from
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. and through its initial
public offering in 1993. Prior to joining Norand,
Mr. Hammer also served as chairman, president and chief
executive officer of publicly-held Telequest Corporation from
1987 until 1988 and of privately-held Material Progress
Corporation from 1982 until 1987. Prior to joining Material
Progress Corporation, Mr. Hammer spent 15 years in
various sales, marketing and management positions with Celanese
Corporation, rising to the level of vice president and general
manager of the structural composites materials business.
Mr. Hammer obtained his bachelor’s degree and
master’s degree in business administration from Columbia
University.
Alan G. Bunte has served as our Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer since October 2003 and served as our
senior vice president from December 1999 until October 2003.
Prior to joining
our company, Mr. Bunte served Norand
Corporation from 1986 to January 1998, serving as its senior
vice president of planning and business development from 1991 to
January 1998. Mr. Bunte obtained his bachelor’s and
master’s degrees in business administration from the
University of Iowa.
61
Louis F. Miceli has served as our Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer since April 1997 and has over
30 years of experience in various finance capacities for
several high-technology companies. Prior to joining
our company,
Mr. Miceli served as chief financial officer of University
Hospital, part of the University of Medicine and Dentistry of
New Jersey (UMDNJ), from 1994 until 1997 and as the corporate
controller of UMDNJ from 1992 until 1994. Prior to joining
UMDNJ, Mr. Miceli served as the chief financial officer of
Syntrex, Inc., a word processing software and hardware
manufacturer, from 1985 until 1992, and as its controller from
1980 until 1985. Mr. Miceli began his career as a staff
auditor at
Ernst & Young LLP, where he served five
years. Mr. Miceli obtained his bachelor’s degree,
cum laude, in accounting from Seton Hall University and
is a certified public accountant in the State of New Jersey.
Ron Miiller has served as our Vice President of Sales,
Americas since January 2005. Prior to his current role,
Mr. Miiller served as our Central Region Sales Manager from
March 2000 to December 2004. Prior to joining
our company,
Mr. Miiller served as Director, Central Region Sales for
Softworks, Inc., an EMC company, from March 1997 through March
2000, and prior to that Mr. Miiller was with Moore
Corporation, a diversified print and electronic communications
company from 1989 through March 1997 in various leadership
roles. Mr. Miiller received his bachelor of science degree
in marketing from Ball State University in 1989.
Anand Prahlad has served as our Vice President, Product
Development since May 2001 and has been with
our company since
1994 as a software development and software developer manager
and, from February 1999 to May 2001, as our senior director of
product development. As a software developer, Mr. Prahlad
oversaw the development of our QiNetix Galaxy software
applications. Prior to joining
our company, Mr. Prahlad was
a software engineer with Mortgage Guaranty Insurance
Corporation, a provider of private mortgage insurance coverage.
Mr. Prahlad obtained his bachelor’s degree from
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University in India and his
master’s degree in electrical and computer engineering from
Marquette University.
Suresh P. Reddy has served as our Vice President,
Worldwide Technical Services & Technical Support since
April 2005. Mr. Reddy also served
our company from 1990
through March 2005, serving as our Vice President, Worldwide
Technical Services from September 2001 through March 2005, as
our Western Regional Manager, Technical Services from March 1994
through July 1995 and again from March 1998 until August 2001,
as our Director of Technical Services, Europe, Middle East and
Asia from August 1995 to February 1998 and as a Systems Engineer
from February 1990 to February 1994. Mr. Reddy obtained his
bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Jawaharlal
Nehru Technological University in India and his master’s
degree in computer sciences from the New Jersey Institute of
Technology.
David West has served as our Vice President, Marketing
and Business Development since September 2005 and our Vice
President, Business Development from August 2000 to September
2005. Prior to joining
our company, Mr. West served as a
director of strategic alliances from April 1999 to July 2000 and
vice president of storage solutions in July 2000 at Legato
Systems, Inc., which was subsequently acquired by EMC
Corporation. Prior to joining Legato Systems, Mr. West
served as vice president of sales at Intelliguard Software,
Inc., which was also subsequently acquired by EMC Corporation,
from 1990 to April 1999. Mr. West obtained his
bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Villanova
University.
Thomas Barry has served as a director of
our company
since our acquisition from Lucent in April 1996 and is chairman
of our Nominations and Governance Committee. Mr. Barry
periodically provides consulting services through
T & M Barry Consulting LLC, which he
formed in February 2002. Mr. Barry served as executive
vice president of Glencoe Capital LLC from 1997 until 1998 and
in several investment banking and corporate finance positions at
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette (now part of Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC) from 1980 through 1997. Mr. Barry
obtained his bachelor’s degree in accounting from Pace
University and received a master of science in computer science
from Columbia University in February 2002.
Frank J. Fanzilli, Jr. has served as a director of
our company since July 2002. Prior to his retirement in March
2002, Mr. Fanzilli spent 17 years at Credit Suisse
First Boston LLC (now Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC),
holding a variety of positions in information technology and
rising to the level of
62
managing director and chief information officer. Prior to
joining Credit Suisse First Boston, Mr. Fanzilli spent
seven years at IBM, where he managed systems engineering and
software development for Fortune 50 accounts. Mr. Fanzilli
obtained his bachelor’s degree in management, cum
laude, from Fairfield University and his master’s in
business administration, with distinction, from New York
University. Mr. Fanzilli also serves on the board of
directors of Interwoven, Inc., MLayers Inc. and Sona Mobile, Inc.
Armando Geday has served as a director of
our company
since July 2000. From April 1997 until February 2004,
Mr. Geday served as president, chief executive officer and
a director of GlobespanVirata, Inc., a digital subscriber line
chipset design company. After GlobespanVirata was acquired by
Conexant Systems, Inc. in 2004, Mr. Geday served as chief
executive officer of Conexant from February 2004 until November
2004. Prior to joining GlobespanVirata, Mr. Geday served as
vice president and general manager of the multimedia
communications division of Rockwell Semiconductor Systems from
1986 to 1997. Prior to joining Rockwell, Mr. Geday held
several other marketing and general management positions at
Rockwell and Harris Semiconductor. Mr. Geday obtained his
bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from the
Florida Institute of Technology. Mr. Geday also serves on
the board of directors of MagnaChip Semiconductor.
Keith Geeslin has served as a director of
our company
since May 1996 and is chairman of our Compensation Committee.
Mr. Geeslin became a partner at Francisco Partners in
January 2004, prior to which Mr. Geeslin spent
19 years with the Sprout Group, an internal division of
Credit Suisse First Boston Private Equity, Inc., the last four
as managing partner. Credit Suisse First Boston Private Equity,
Inc. is an affiliate of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, an
underwriter in this offering. Prior to joining the Sprout Group,
Mr. Geeslin was the general manager of a division of
Tymshare, Inc. and held various positions at its Tymnet
subsidiary from 1980 to 1984. Mr. Geeslin obtained his
bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Stanford
University and master’s degrees from Stanford University
and Oxford University. Mr. Geeslin also serves on the board
of directors of Synaptics, Inc. and Yipes Enterprise Services,
Inc.
Edward A. Johnson has served as a director of
our company
since May 2005. Mr. Johnson has served as a managing
director and partner at DLJ Merchant Banking since the merger of
Credit Suisse First Boston LLC (now Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC) with Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette in
November 2000. Mr. Johnson initially joined Credit Suisse
First Boston Equity Partners, L.P. in September 1998. Credit
Suisse First Boston Equity Partners, L.P. is an affiliate of
Credit Suisse Securities USA (LLC), an underwriter in this
offering. Prior to joining Credit Suisse First Boston,
Mr. Johnson spent four years at Warburg Pincus, LLC in its
private equity area, and spent two years as a consultant with
the Boston Consulting Group. Prior to earning his master’s
in business administration, Mr. Johnson served as a
refinery planner for Chevron Corporation. Mr. Johnson
obtained his bachelor of science degree in chemical engineering
from Stevens Institute of Technology and master’s in
business administration from the Wharton School of the
University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Johnson also serves on the
board of directors of Focus Diagnostics, Inc., Aircast Inc.,
Thompson Publishing Group and Wastequip, Inc. Mr. Johnson
will resign his directorship immediately prior to the closing of
this offering.
F. Robert Kurimsky has served as a director of our
company since February 2001. Mr. Kurimsky served as senior
vice president of Technology Solutions Company, a systems
integrator, from 1994 through 1998 and again from January 2002
through June 2003. Mr. Kurimsky served as senior vice
president of The Concours Group, a consulting and executive
education provider, from 1998 through December 2001. Prior to
his service with Technology Solutions Company, Mr. Kurimsky
spent 20 years in information systems and administration
functions at the Philip Morris Companies, Inc. (now Altria
Group, Inc.), rising to the level of vice president.
Mr. Kurimsky obtained a bachelor of science at Fairfield
University and a master of engineering degree from Yale
University. Mr. Kurimsky also serves on the board of
directors of The Advisory Council, a privately-held research and
advisory services company.
Daniel Pulver has served as a director of
our company
since October 1999. Mr. Pulver served as a director at
Credit Suisse First Boston Private Equity, Inc. from November
2000, when Credit Suisse First Boston LLC (now Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC) merged with Donaldson,
Lufkin & Jenrette, until April 2005. Credit Suisse
First Boston Private Equity, Inc. is an affiliate of Credit
Suisse Securities
63
USA (LLC), an underwriter in this offering. Mr. Pulver
obtained his bachelor’s degree from Stanford University and
his master’s in business administration from Harvard
Business School. Mr. Pulver also serves on the board of
directors and the compensation committee of Nextpharma S.A.
Gary B. Smith has served as a director of
our company
since May 2004. Mr. Smith is currently the president, chief
executive officer and a director of Ciena Corporation.
Mr. Smith began serving as chief executive officer of Ciena
in May 2001, in addition to his existing responsibilities as
president and director, positions he has held since October
2000. Prior to his current role, his positions with Ciena
included chief operating officer and senior vice president,
worldwide sales. Mr. Smith joined Ciena in November 1997 as
vice president, international sales. From 1995 through 1997,
Mr. Smith served as vice president of sales and marketing
for INTELSAT. He also previously served as vice president of
sales and marketing for Cray Communications, Inc. Mr. Smith
received his master’s in business administration from
Ashridge Management College, United Kingdom. Mr. Smith
currently serves on the board of directors for the American
Electronics Association, and also serves as a commissioner for
the Global Information Infrastructure Commission.
David F. Walker has served as a director of
our company
since February 2006 and is chairman of our Audit Committee.
Mr. Walker is the Director of the Accountancy Program and
the Program for Social Responsibility and Corporate Reporting at
the University of South Florida St. Petersburg, where he has
been employed since 2002. Prior to joining the University of
South Florida, Mr. Walker was with Arthur Andersen LLP,
having served as a partner in that firm from 1986 through 2002.
Mr. Walker earned a master’s of business
administration from the University of Chicago Graduate School of
Business with concentration in accounting, finance and
marketing, and a bachelor of arts degree from DePauw University
with majors in economics and mathematics and a minor in business
administration. Mr. Walker is a certified public accountant
and a certified fraud examiner. Mr. Walker also serves on
the board of directors of Chico’s FAS, Inc., First
Advantage Corporation and Technology Research Corporation,
participating on the executive, audit and corporate governance
committees of Chico’s and chairing its audit committee;
chairing the audit committee of First Advantage; and
participating on the audit, compensation and nominating
committees of Technology Research and chairing its audit
committee.
Upon the closing of the offering, the board of directors will be
divided into three classes, with one class of directors elected
at each annual meeting. The members of Class I, whose terms
expire at the next annual meeting, will be
Messrs. Kurimsky, Walker and Geday. The members of
Class II, whose terms expire at the second annual meeting
following this offering, will be Messrs. Pulver, Barry and
Fanzilli. The members of Class III, whose terms expire at
the third annual meeting following this offering, will be
Messrs. Hammer, Geeslin and Smith.
Director Compensation
Our compensation committee of the board of directors determines
the amount of any fees, whether payable in cash, shares of
common stock or options to purchase common stock, and expense
reimbursement that directors receive for attending meetings of
the board of directors or committees of the board. To date,
other than to members of our Audit Committee, we have not paid
any fees to our directors, but we have reimbursed them for their
expenses incurred in connection with attending meetings.
Following the completion of this offering, we intend to
compensate non-employee directors for their service on our
board. Each non-employee director will be eligible to receive an
annual retainer of
$ ,
with an additional stipend of
$ for
each board meeting, and
$ for
each committee meeting, attended in person. The chairperson of
our audit committee will be eligible to receive an additional
annual retainer of
$ .
Non-employee directors elected to the board of directors in the
future will be eligible to receive an initial option grant
of shares
upon their election. In addition, non-employee directors will be
eligible to receive annual option grants
of shares
beginning
on ,
except that some of our current non-employee directors will not
be eligible to receive an annual grant until the options they
currently hold have fully vested. Option grants to our
non-employee directors will vest monthly over a
64
four-year period, except that the shares that would otherwise
vest over the first 12 months shall not vest until the
first anniversary of the grant. All option grants to our
non-employee directors will be pursuant to our 2006 Long-Term
Stock Incentive Plan. See “— Employee Benefit
Plans — 2006 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan” for
more information about this plan. We will also continue to
reimburse all of our directors for their reasonable expenses
incurred in attending meetings of our board or committees.
Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth information concerning the
compensation received for services rendered to us by our Chief
Executive Officer and each of our five most highly-compensated
executive officers for the year ended
March 31, 2005:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term | |
| |
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
Compensation Awards | |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Annual | |
|
Securities Underlying | |
| Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Compensation(1) | |
|
Options | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
348,076 |
|
|
$ |
116,500 |
|
|
$ |
83,427 (2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan G. Bunte
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
242,538 |
|
|
|
115,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
239,654 |
|
|
|
100,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|