Filed On 3/22/07 5:15pm ET · SEC File 333-141522 · Accession Number 950135-7-1814
As Of Filer Filing As/For/On Docs:Pgs Issuer Agent
3/22/07 Netezza Corp S-1 16:456 Bowne of Boston I..01/FA
Document/Exhibit Description Pages Size
1: S-1 Netezza Corporation HTML 1,249K
2: EX-3.3 EX-3.3 Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of 18 68K
Incorporation
3: EX-10.1 EX-10.1 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, As Amended 12 41K
4: EX-10.2 EX-10.2 Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement 8 27K
Under 2000 Stock Incentive Plan
5: EX-10.3 EX-10.3 Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option 8 26K
Agreement Under 2000 Stock Incentive
Plan
6: EX-10.4 EX-10.4 Form of Restricted Stock Option Agreement 12 43K
Under 2000 Stock Incentive Plan
7: EX-10.9 EX-10.9 Fiscal 2008 Executive Officer Incentive 7 29K
Bonus Plan
8: EX-10.10 EX-10.10 Lease Agreement, Dated February 12, 2004 44 160K
9: EX-10.11 EX-10.11 Third Amended and Restated Investor 28 97K
Rights Agreement
10: EX-10.12 EX-10.12 Amendment No. 1 to the Third Amended and 6 17K
Restated Investor Rights Agreement
11: EX-10.13 EX-10.13 Letter Agreement, Dated June 1, 2006 2 14K
12: EX-10.14 EX-10.14 Form of Executive Retention Agreement 12 45K
13: EX-10.15 EX-10.15 Form of Indemnification Agreement 8 34K
14: EX-10.16 EX-10.16 Term Loan and Security Agreement Dated 31 99K
June 14, 2005
15: EX-10.17 EX-10.17 Loan and Security Agreement Dated January 41 140K
31, 2007
16: EX-23.1 EX-23.1 Consent of Pricewaterhousecooper HTML 7K
This is an EDGAR HTML document rendered as filed. [ Alternative Formats ]
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 22, 2007
Registration
No. 333-
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
Netezza Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
3571
|
|
04-3527320
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
Netezza Corporation
200 Crossing Boulevard
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s
principal executive offices)
Jitendra S. Saxena
Chief Executive Officer
Netezza Corporation
200 Crossing Boulevard
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for
service)
Copies to:
| |
|
|
Patrick J. Rondeau, Esq.
Wendell C. Taylor, Esq.
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
60 State Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
(617) 526-6000
|
|
Anthony J.
Medaglia, Jr., P.C.
John M. Mutkoski, Esq.
Jocelyn M. Arel, Esq.
Goodwin Procter LLP
Exchange Place
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
(617) 570-1000
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to
public: as soon as practicable after this
Registration Statement is declared effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following box. o
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier registration statement for the same
offering. o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Amount of
|
Title of Each Class of
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering
|
|
|
Registration
|
|
Securities to be Registered
|
|
|
Price(1)
|
|
|
Fee(2)
|
|
Common Stock, $0.001 par
value per share
|
|
|
$100,000,000
|
|
|
$3,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration
fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended. |
| |
|
(2) |
|
Calculated pursuant to Rule 457(o) based on an estimate of
the proposed maximum aggregate offering price. |
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to Section 8(a), may determine.
The information in
this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We and the
selling stockholders may not sell these securities until the
registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell
these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
Shares
Netezza Corporation
Common Stock
This is the initial public offering of shares of our common
stock. We are
selling shares
of our common stock.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock. The initial public offering price of our common
stock is expected to be
between and
per share. We have applied to list our common stock on the
NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “NTZA.”
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See
“Risk Factors” beginning on page 7.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounts and
|
|
|
Proceeds to
|
|
|
|
|
Price to Public
|
|
|
Commissions
|
|
|
Netezza Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
Certain of our stockholders have granted the underwriters the
right to purchase up to an
additional shares
of common stock to cover over-allotments.
The Securities and Exchange Commission and state securities
regulators have not approved or disapproved of these securities
or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares to purchasers
on ,
2007.
|
|
| Credit
Suisse |
Morgan Stanley |
|
|
| Needham &
Company, LLC |
Thomas
Weisel Partners LLC |
, 2007
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
You should rely only on the information contained in this
document and any free writing prospectus prepared by or on
behalf of us or to which we have referred you. We have not
authorized anyone to provide you with information that is
different. This document may only be used where it is legal to
sell these securities. The information in this document may only
be accurate on the date of this document.
Dealer
Prospectus Delivery Obligation
Until ,
2007 (25 days after the commencement of this offering), all
dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or
not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This is in addition to the dealer’s obligation
to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with
respect to unsold allotments or subscriptions.
i
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information appearing elsewhere in
this prospectus. This summary does not contain all of the
information you should consider before investing in our common
stock. You should read this entire prospectus carefully,
especially the “Risk Factors” section beginning on
page 7 and our consolidated financial statements and the
related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, before
making an investment decision.
NETEZZA
CORPORATION
Overview
Netezza is a leading provider of data warehouse appliances. Our
product, the Netezza Performance Server, or NPS, integrates
database, server and storage platforms in a purpose-built unit
to enable detailed queries and analyses on large volumes of
stored data. The results of these queries and analyses, often
referred to as business intelligence, provide organizations with
actionable information to improve their business operations. We
designed our NPS data warehouse appliance specifically for
analysis of terabytes of data at higher performance levels and
at a lower total cost of ownership with greater ease of use than
can be achieved via traditional data warehouse systems. Our NPS
appliance performs faster, deeper and more iterative analyses on
larger amounts of detailed data, giving our customers greater
insight into trends and anomalies in their businesses, thereby
enabling them to make better strategic decisions.
As of
January 31, 2007, we had shipped over 200 of our data
warehouse appliances worldwide to 87 data-intensive customers
including large global enterprises, mid-market companies and
government agencies. Our customers span multiple vertical
industries and include data intensive companies and government
agencies such as Ahold, Amazon.com, American Red Cross, AOL,
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Rhode Island, Capital One Services,
Catalina Marketing, CNET Networks, CompuCredit Corporation,
LoanPerformance, Marriott, the NASD, Neiman Marcus Group,
Nielsen Company, Orange UK, Restoration Hardware, Ross Stores,
Ryder Systems, Source Healthcare Analytics, Inc., a Wolters
Kluwer Health company, the United States Army Corps of Engineers
and the United States Department of Veterans Affairs. Our
revenues have increased rapidly, from $13.6 million in
fiscal 2004 to $79.6 million in fiscal 2007, representing a
compound annual growth rate of 80.1%.
The
Industry
The amount of data that is being generated and stored by
organizations is exploding. Examples of this data include
click-stream records generated by
e-business,
customer purchasing histories, call data records, information
from RFID tagging of inventory and products, and pharmaceutical
trial data. Additionally, compliance initiatives driven by
government regulations, such as those issued under the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Health Insurance Portability
and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, as well as company
policies requiring data preservation, are expanding the
proportion of data that must be retained and easily accessible
for future use. As the volume of data continues to grow,
enterprises have recognized the value of analyzing such data to
significantly improve their operations and competitive position.
These enterprises have also realized that frequent analysis of
data at a more detailed level is more meaningful than periodic
analysis of sampled data.
This increasing amount of data and importance of data analysis
has led to heightened demand for data warehouses that provide
the critical framework for data-driven enterprise
decision-making and business intelligence. A data warehouse
consists of three main elements — database, server,
and storage — and interacts with external systems to
acquire and retain raw data, receive query instructions and
provide analytical results. The data warehouse acts as a data
repository for an enterprise, aggregating information from many
departments, and more importantly, enabling analytics through
the querying of the data to deliver specific information. The
need for more robust, yet cost-effective, data warehouse
solutions is being accelerated by the growing number of users of
business intelligence within the enterprise, the increasing
volume and sophistication of their queries and the need for
real-time data availability.
1
Our
Solution
In contrast to traditional data warehouse systems which patch
together general-purpose database, server and storage platforms
that were not originally designed for analytical processing of
large amounts of constantly changing data, our NPS appliance is
designed specifically to provide high-performance business
intelligence solutions at a low total cost of ownership. It
tightly couples database, server, and storage platforms in a
compact, efficient unit that integrates easily through open,
industry-standard interfaces with leading data access and
integration tools. This approach, combined with our proprietary
Intelligent Query Streaming technology and Asymmetric Massively
Parallel Processing architecture, provides significant benefits
to our customers, including:
Superior Performance. The time required to
perform many complex and ad hoc queries on terabytes of data is
reduced from days or hours to minutes or seconds, enabling our
customers to analyze their data more comprehensively so they can
make faster and better decisions.
Easy and Cost-Effective Procurement. Combining
database, server, and storage platforms into a single scalable
platform, based on open standards and commodity components,
delivers a significant cost advantage and enables an easier
procurement process when compared with competing products.
Quick and Easy Infrastructure Installation and
Deployment. With our NPS appliance, data is
loaded quickly and easily, and existing tools and software can
be easily integrated through standard interfaces. Our NPS
appliance can be quickly installed and deployed with minimal
need for custom configuration or additional professional
services.
Rapid Adaptation to Changing Business
Needs. Since our NPS appliance does not require
the tuning, data indexing or the same degree of maintenance and
configuration required by traditional systems, the NPS appliance
can accommodate changes easily without additional administrative
effort.
Minimal Ongoing Administration and
Maintenance. As a self-regulated and
self-monitored data warehouse appliance, our systems typically
require less than a single administrator to manage.
Small Footprint, and Low Power and Cooling
Requirements. Our NPS appliance is a compact,
tightly integrated appliance that requires a significantly
smaller data center “footprint”, consumes less power
and generates less heat than traditional systems.
High Degree of Scalability. Our unique
architecture enables our systems to scale effectively with
additional users, more sophisticated queries and greater amounts
of data. More users can be supported and additional capacity
added quickly and easily, enabling customers to “pay as
they grow.”
Our
Strategy
Our objective is to become the leading provider of data
warehouse solutions. We plan to accomplish this through the
following business strategies:
Broaden Our Target Markets. We plan to
continue our market penetration in the vertical industries that
we currently serve, while expanding into new markets that can
also utilize business intelligence at an affordable cost. We
also plan to expand in the mid-market, enabling companies with
fewer resources and smaller budgets to leverage the benefits of
our data warehouse appliances.
Increase Sales to Our Existing Customer
Base. As our customers increasingly benefit from
the advantages of our solution, we expect further sales to them
to accommodate an increasing number of users and their growing
amount of stored data, as well as for deployment of data
warehouses for other applications in addition to the ones for
which they initially purchased our system.
Extend Our Technology Leadership. We believe
that our proprietary product architecture and design provide us
with significant competitive advantages over traditional data
warehouse systems. We plan to continue to enhance our existing
products and introduce new products to enable us to maintain our
cost and performance advantages versus competitors.
2
Expand Distribution Channels. We plan to
continue to invest in our global distribution channels,
including our direct salesforce and relationships with
resellers, systems integration firms and analytic service
providers to accelerate the sales of our products.
Develop Additional Strategic Relationships. We
plan to continue to invest in our relationships with technology
partners in the complementary areas of data access and
analytics, data integration and data protection to simplify
integration and increase sales of our combined offerings.
Expand Our Customer Support Capabilities. We
intend to invest in our global customer support organization to
enable us to continue providing “high-touch,”
high-quality support as we scale our customer base.
Pursue Selected Acquisition Opportunities. We
intend to pursue acquisitions of products
and/or
technologies that we believe are complementary to or can be
integrated into our current product suite.
“Be Easy to Do Business With.” Our products,
pricing,
contracts and support principles are simple,
straightforward and customer friendly. We plan to continue to
operate with these principles to further differentiate our
offerings from those of our larger competitors
.
Company
Information
We were incorporated in Delaware on
August 18, 2000 as
Intelligent Data Engines, Inc. and changed our name to Netezza
Corporation in November 2000. Our corporate headquarters are
located at 200 Crossing Boulevard,
Framingham,
Massachusetts
01702, and our telephone number is
(508) 665-6800.
Our
website address is
www.netezza.com. The information
contained on our
website or that can be accessed through our
website is not part of this prospectus, and investors should not
rely on any such information in deciding whether to purchase our
common stock.
We use various trademarks and trade names in our business,
including without limitation “Netezza,” “Netezza
Performance Server,” “NPS” and “Intelligent
Query Streaming.” This prospectus also contains trademarks
and trade names of other businesses that are the property of
their respective holders.
Unless the context otherwise requires, we use the terms
“Netezza,” “our company,” “we,”
“us” and
“our” in this prospectus to refer
to Netezza Corporation and its
subsidiaries.
3
THE
OFFERING
|
|
|
|
Common stock offered |
|
shares |
| |
|
Over-allotment option offered by the selling stockholders |
|
shares |
| |
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering |
|
shares |
| |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We intend to use the net proceeds to us from this offering for
working capital and other general corporate purposes, including
the development of new products, sales and marketing activities,
capital expenditures and the costs of operating as a public
company. We also intend to use a portion of the net proceeds to
us to repay approximately $ of
debt. We may use a portion of the net proceeds to us to expand
our current business through acquisitions of other companies,
assets or technologies. We will not receive any of the proceeds
from the sale of shares of common stock by the selling
stockholders. See “Use of Proceeds” for more
information. |
| |
|
Risk factors |
|
You should read the “Risk Factors” section of this
prospectus for a discussion of factors to consider carefully
before deciding whether to purchase shares of our common stock. |
| |
|
Proposed NASDAQ Global Market symbol |
|
“NTZA” |
The number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding after
this offering is based on 46,309,542 shares of our common
stock outstanding as of
February 28, 2007 and excludes:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
9,039,748 shares of our common stock issuable upon the
exercise of stock options outstanding as of February 28,
2007;
|
| |
| |
•
|
2,412,107 shares of our common stock reserved as of
February 28, 2007 for future issuance under our stock
compensation plans; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
312,781 shares of our common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants outstanding as of February 28, 2007.
|
Unless otherwise indicated, the information in this prospectus
assumes the following:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
a
one-for-two
reverse split of our common stock to be effected prior to the
closing of this offering;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the automatic conversion of all of our outstanding convertible
preferred stock into 38,774,847 shares of our common stock
upon the closing of this offering;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the filing of our second amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and the adoption of our amended and restated
by-laws as of the closing date of this offering; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
no exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option.
|
4
SUMMARY
FINANCIAL DATA
You should read the following financial information together
with the more detailed information contained in
“Selected
Consolidated Financial Data,” “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and
the related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. Our
fiscal year ends on January 31. When we refer to a
particular fiscal year, we are referring to the fiscal year
ended on January 31 of that year. For example, fiscal 2007
refers to the fiscal year ended
January 31, 2007.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share, per share
|
|
|
|
|
and other operating data)
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of
Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
30,908
|
|
|
$
|
45,508
|
|
|
$
|
64,632
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
5,121
|
|
|
|
8,343
|
|
|
|
14,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
36,029
|
|
|
|
53,851
|
|
|
|
79,621
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
8,874
|
|
|
|
18,941
|
|
|
|
26,697
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
|
|
3,491
|
|
|
|
5,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
|
10,514
|
|
|
|
22,432
|
|
|
|
32,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
25,515
|
|
|
|
31,419
|
|
|
|
47,521
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
14,783
|
|
|
|
25,626
|
|
|
|
32,908
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
11,366
|
|
|
|
16,703
|
|
|
|
18,037
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
3,124
|
|
|
|
4,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
28,649
|
|
|
|
45,453
|
|
|
|
55,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(3,134
|
)
|
|
|
(14,034
|
)
|
|
|
(8,251
|
)
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(3,014
|
)
|
|
|
(13,807
|
)
|
|
|
(7,975
|
)
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(3,014
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,025
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,975
|
)
|
|
Accretion to preferred stock
|
|
|
(4,096
|
)
|
|
|
(5,797
|
)
|
|
|
(5,931
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common
shareholders
|
|
$
|
(7,110
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,822
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,906
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share attributable to
common stockholders — basic and diluted Loss before
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
$
|
(0.50
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.10
|
)
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Accretion to preferred stock
|
|
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
|
(0.88
|
)
|
|
|
(0.82
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share attributable to
common stockholders — basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.99
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.92
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding:
|
|
|
6,077,538
|
|
|
|
6,635,274
|
|
|
|
7,230,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss per
share — basic and diluted (unaudited)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average common
shares outstanding (unaudited)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,005,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of customers
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
Number of full-time employees
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The pro forma consolidated
statement of operations data in the table above gives effect to
the automatic conversion of all of our outstanding convertible
preferred stock into common stock upon the closing of this
offering.
|
5
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro Forma(1)
|
|
|
As Adjusted(2)
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
5,018
|
|
|
$
|
5,018
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
25,899
|
|
|
|
25,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
69,199
|
|
|
|
69,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable to bank, including
current portion
|
|
|
6,535
|
|
|
|
6,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible redeemable preferred
stock
|
|
|
97,131
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
(deficit)
|
|
|
(81,123
|
)
|
|
|
16,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The pro forma consolidated balance sheet data in the table above
gives effect to the automatic conversion of all of our
outstanding convertible preferred stock into common stock upon
the closing of this offering. |
| |
|
(2) |
|
The pro forma as adjusted consolidated balance sheet data in the
table above gives effect to our receipt of the estimated net
proceeds to us from this offering at an assumed initial public
offering price of $ per
share, which is the midpoint of the range listed on the cover
page of this prospectus, after deducting estimated underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses
payable by us. |
6
RISK
FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of
risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties
described below together with all of the other information
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, including our
consolidated financial statements and the related notes, before
deciding whether to purchase shares of our common stock. Each of
these risks could materially adversely affect our business,
operating results and financial condition. As a result, the
trading price of our common stock could decline and you might
lose all or part of your investment in our common stock.
Risks
Related to Our Business and Industry
We
have a history of losses, and we may not achieve or maintain
profitability in the future.
We have not been profitable in any fiscal period since we were
formed. We experienced a net loss of $14.0 million in
fiscal 2006 and $8.0 million in fiscal 2007. As of
January 31, 2007, our accumulated deficit was
$80.8 million. We expect to make significant additional
expenditures to facilitate the expansion of our business,
including expenditures in the areas of sales, research and
development, and customer service and support. Additionally, as
a public company, we expect to incur legal, accounting and other
expenses that are substantially higher than the expenses we
incurred as a private company. Furthermore, we may encounter
unforeseen issues that require us to incur additional costs. As
a result of these increased expenditures, we will have to
generate and sustain increased revenue to achieve profitability.
Accordingly, we may not be able to achieve or maintain
profitability and we may continue to incur significant losses in
the future.
Our
operating results may fluctuate significantly from quarter to
quarter and may fall below expectations in any particular fiscal
quarter, which could adversely affect the market price of our
common stock.
Our operating results are difficult to predict and may fluctuate
from quarter to quarter due to a variety of factors, many of
which are outside of our control. As a result, comparing our
operating results on a
period-to-period
basis may not be meaningful, and you should not rely on our past
results as an indication of our future performance. If our
revenue or operating results fall below the expectations of
investors or any securities analysts that follow
our company in
any period, the price of our common stock would likely decline.
Factors that may cause our operating results to fluctuate
include:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the typical recording of a significant portion of our quarterly
sales in the final month of the quarter, whereby small delays in
completion of sales transactions could have a significant impact
on our operating results for that quarter;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the relatively high average selling price of our products and
our dependence on a limited number of customers for a
substantial portion of our revenue in any quarterly period,
whereby the loss of or delay in a customer order could
significantly reduce our revenue for that quarter;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the possibility of seasonality in demand for our products;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the addition of new customers or the loss of existing customers;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the rates at which customers purchase additional products or
additional capacity for existing products from us;
|
| |
| |
•
|
changes in the mix of products and services sold;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the rates at which customers renew their maintenance and support
contracts with us;
|
| |
| |
•
|
our ability to enhance our products with new and better
functionality that meet customer requirements;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the timing of recognizing revenue as a result of revenue
recognition rules, including due to the timing of delivery and
receipt of our products;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the length of our product sales cycle;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the productivity and growth of our salesforce;
|
7
|
|
|
| |
•
|
service interruptions with any of our single source suppliers or
manufacturing partners;
|
| |
| |
•
|
changes in pricing by us or our competitors, or the need to
provide discounts to win business;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the timing of our product releases or upgrades or similar
announcements by us or our competitors;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the timing of investments in research and development related to
new product releases or upgrades;
|
| |
| |
•
|
our ability to control costs, including operating expenses and
the costs of the components used in our products;
|
| |
| |
•
|
volatility in our stock price, which may lead to higher stock
compensation expenses pursuant to Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payment, or SFAS No. 123(R), which first became
effective for us in fiscal 2007 and requires that employee
stock-based compensation be measured based on fair value on
grant date and treated as an expense that is reflected in our
financial statements over the recipient’s service period;
|
| |
| |
•
|
future accounting pronouncements and changes in accounting
policies;
|
| |
| |
•
|
costs related to the acquisition and integration of companies,
assets or technologies;
|
| |
| |
•
|
technology and intellectual property issues associated with our
products; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
general economic trends, including changes in information
technology spending or geopolitical events such as war or
incidents of terrorism.
|
Most of our operating expenses do not vary directly with revenue
and are difficult to adjust in the short term. As a result, if
revenue for a particular quarter is below our expectations, we
could not proportionately reduce operating expenses for that
quarter, and therefore this revenue shortfall would have a
disproportionate effect on our expected operating results for
that quarter.
Our
limited operating history and the emerging nature of the data
warehouse market make it difficult to evaluate our current
business and future prospects, and may increase the risk of your
investment.
Our company has only been in existence since August 2000. We
first began shipping products in February 2003 and much of our
growth has occurred in the past two fiscal years. Our limited
operating history and the nascent state of the data warehouse
market in which we operate makes it difficult to evaluate our
current business and our future prospects. As a result, we
cannot be certain that we will sustain our growth or achieve or
maintain profitability. We will encounter risks and difficulties
frequently experienced by early-stage companies in
rapidly-evolving industries. These risks include the need to:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
attract new customers and maintain current customer
relationships;
|
| |
| |
•
|
continue to develop and upgrade our data warehouse solutions;
|
| |
| |
•
|
respond quickly and effectively to competitive pressures;
|
| |
| |
•
|
offer competitive pricing or provide discounts to customers in
order to win business;
|
| |
| |
•
|
manage our expanding operations;
|
| |
| |
•
|
maintain adequate control over our expenses;
|
| |
| |
•
|
maintain adequate internal controls and procedures;
|
| |
| |
•
|
maintain our reputation, build trust with our customers and
further establish our brand; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
identify, attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.
|
If we fail to successfully address these needs, our business,
operating results and financial condition may be adversely
affected.
8
We
depend on a single product family, the Netezza Performance
Server family, for all of our revenue, so we are particularly
vulnerable to any factors adversely affecting the sale of that
product family.
Our revenue is derived exclusively from sales and service of the
NPS product family, and we expect that this product family will
account for substantially all of our revenue for the foreseeable
future. If the data warehouse market declines or the Netezza
Performance Server fails to maintain or achieve greater market
acceptance, we will not be able to grow our revenues
sufficiently to achieve or maintain profitability.
We
face intense and growing competition from leading technology
companies as well as from emerging companies. Our inability to
compete effectively with any or all of these competitors could
impact our ability to achieve our anticipated market penetration
and achieve or sustain profitability.
The data warehouse market is highly competitive and we expect
competition to intensify in the future. This competition may
make it more difficult for us to sell our products, and may
result in increased pricing pressure, reduced profit margins,
increased sales and marketing expenses and failure to increase,
or the loss of, market share, any of which would likely
seriously harm our business, operating results and financial
condition.
Currently, our most significant competition includes companies
which typically sell several if not all elements of a data
warehouse environment as individual products, including database
software, servers, storage and professional services. These
competitors are often leaders in many of these segments
including EMC, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Oracle, Sun Microsystems,
Sybase and Teradata (a division of NCR). In addition, a large
number of fast growing companies have recently entered the
market, many of them selling integrated appliance offerings
similar to our products. Additionally, as the benefits of an
appliance solution have become evident in the marketplace, many
of our larger competitors have also begun to bundle their
products into appliance-like offerings that more directly
compete with our products. We also expect additional competition
in the future from new and existing companies with whom we do
not currently compete directly. As our industry evolves, our
current and potential competitors may establish cooperative
relationships among themselves or with third parties, including
software and hardware companies with whom we have partnerships
and whose products interoperate with our own, that could acquire
significant market share, which could adversely affect our
business. We also face competition from internally-developed
systems. Any of these competitive threats, alone or in
combination with others, could seriously harm our business,
operating results and financial condition.
Many of our competitors have greater market presence, longer
operating histories, stronger name recognition, larger customer
bases and significantly greater financial, technical, sales and
marketing, manufacturing, distribution and other resources than
we have. In addition, many of our competitors have broader
product and service offerings than we do. These companies may
attempt to use their greater resources to better position
themselves in the data warehouse market including by pricing
their products at a discount or bundling them with other
products and services in an attempt to rapidly gain market
share. Moreover, many of our competitors have more extensive
customer and partner relationships than we do, and may therefore
be in a better position to identify and respond to market
developments or changes in customer demands. Potential customers
may also prefer to purchase from their existing suppliers rather
than a new supplier regardless of product performance or
features. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete
successfully against existing or new competitors.
If we
lose key personnel, or if we are unable to attract and retain
highly-qualified personnel on a
cost-effective
basis, it will be more difficult for us to manage our business
and to identify and pursue growth opportunities.
Our success depends substantially on the performance of our key
senior management, technical, and sales and marketing personnel.
Each of our employees may terminate his or her relationship with
us at any time and the loss of the services of such persons
could have an adverse effect on our business. We rely on our
senior management to manage our existing business operations and
to identify and pursue new growth opportunities, and our ability
to develop and enhance our products requires talented hardware
and software engineers with specialized skills. In addition, our
success depends in significant part on maintaining and growing
an effective salesforce. We experience intense competition for
such personnel and we cannot ensure that we will successfully
attract, assimilate, or retain highly qualified managerial,
technical or sales and marketing personnel in the future.
9
Our
success depends on the continued recognition of the need for
business intelligence in the marketplace and on the adoption by
our customers of data warehouse appliances, often as
replacements for existing systems, to enable business
intelligence. If we fail to improve our products to further
drive this market migration as well as to successfully compete
with alternative approaches and products, our business would
suffer.
Due to the innovative nature of our products and the new
approaches to business intelligence that our products enable,
purchases of our products often involve the adoption of new
methods of database access and utilization on the part of our
customers. This may entail the acknowledgement of the benefits
conferred by business intelligence and the customer-wide
adoption of business intelligence analysis that makes the
benefits of our system particularly relevant. Business
intelligence solutions are still in their early stages of growth
and their continued adoption and growth in the marketplace
remain uncertain. Additionally, our appliance approach requires
our customers to run their data warehouses in new and innovative
ways and often requires our customers to replace their existing
equipment and supplier relationships, which they may be
unwilling to do, especially in light of the often critical
nature of the components and systems involved and the
significant capital and other resources they may have previously
invested. Furthermore, purchases of our products involve
material changes to established purchasing patterns and
policies. Even if prospective customers recognize the need for
our products, they may not select our NPS solution because they
choose to wait for the introduction of products and technologies
that serve as a replacement or substitute for, or represent an
improvement over, our NPS solutions. Therefore, our future
success also depends on our ability to maintain our leadership
position in the data warehouse market and to proactively address
the needs of the market and our customers to further drive the
adoption of business intelligence and to sustain our competitive
advantage versus competing approaches to business intelligence
and alternative product offerings.
Claims
that we infringe or otherwise misuse the intellectual property
of others could subject us to significant liability and disrupt
our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business and operating results.
Our competitors protect their intellectual property rights by
means such as trade secrets, patents, copyrights and trademarks.
We have not conducted an independent review of patents issued to
third parties. Although we have not been involved in any
litigation related to intellectual property rights of others,
from time to time we receive letters from other parties
alleging, or inquiring about, breaches of their intellectual
property rights. We may in the future be sued for violations of
other parties’ intellectual property rights, and the risk
of such a lawsuit will likely increase as our size and the
number and scope of our products increase, as our geographic
presence and market share expand and as the number of
competitors in our market increases. Any such claims or
litigation could:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
be time-consuming and expensive to defend, whether meritorious
or not;
|
| |
| |
•
|
cause shipment delays;
|
| |
| |
•
|
divert the attention of our technical and managerial resources;
|
| |
| |
•
|
require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements with
third parties, which may not be available on terms that we deem
acceptable, if at all;
|
| |
| |
•
|
prevent us from operating all or a portion of our business or
force us to redesign our products, which could be difficult and
expensive and may degrade the performance of our products;
|
| |
| |
•
|
subject us to significant liability for damages or result in
significant settlement payments; and/or
|
| |
| |
•
|
require us to indemnify our customers, distribution partners or
suppliers.
|
Any of the foregoing could disrupt our business and have a
material adverse effect on our operating results and financial
condition.
10
If we
are unable to develop and introduce new products and
enhancements to existing products, if our new products and
enhancements to existing products do not achieve market
acceptance, or if we fail to manage product transitions, we may
fail to increase, or may lose, market share.
The market for our products is characterized by rapid
technological change, frequent new product introductions and
evolving industry standards. Our future growth depends on the
successful development and introduction of new products and
enhancements to existing products that achieve acceptance in the
market. Due to the complexity of our products, which include
integrated hardware and software components, any new products
and product enhancements would be subject to significant
technical risks that could impact our ability to introduce those
products and enhancements in a timely manner. In addition, such
new products or product enhancements may not achieve market
acceptance despite our expending significant resources to
develop them. If we are unable, for technological or other
reasons, to develop, introduce and enhance our products in a
timely manner in response to changing market conditions or
evolving customer requirements, or if these new products and
product enhancements do not achieve market acceptance due to
competitive or other factors, our operating results and
financial condition could be adversely affected.
Product introductions and certain enhancements of existing
products by us in future periods may also reduce demand for our
existing products or could delay purchases by customers awaiting
arrival of our new products. As new or enhanced products are
introduced, we must successfully manage the transition from
older products in order to minimize disruption in
customers’ ordering patterns, avoid excessive levels of
older product inventories and ensure that sufficient supplies of
new products can be delivered in a timely manner to meet
customer demand.
Our
products must interoperate with our customers’ information
technology infrastructure, including customers’ software
applications, networks, servers and data-access protocols, and
if our products do not do so successfully, we may experience a
weakening demand for our products.
To be competitive in the market, our products must interoperate
with our customers’ information technology infrastructure,
including software applications, network infrastructure and
servers supplied by a variety of other vendors, many of whom are
competitors of ours. Our products currently interoperate with a
number of business intelligence and data-integration
applications provided by vendors including Business Objects,
Cognos, IBM and Oracle, among others. When new or updated
versions of these software applications are introduced, we must
sometimes develop updated versions of our software that may
require assistance from these vendors to ensure that our
products effectively interoperate with these applications. If
these vendors do not provide us with assistance on a timely
basis, or decide not to work with us for competitive or other
reasons, including due to consolidation with our competitors, we
may be unable to ensure such interoperability. Additionally, our
products interoperate with servers, network infrastructure and
software applications predominantly through the use of
data-access protocols. While many of these protocols are created
and maintained by independent standards organizations, some of
these protocols that exist today or that may be created in the
future are, or could be, proprietary technology and therefore
require licensing the proprietary protocol’s specifications
from a third party or implementing the protocol without
specifications. Our development efforts to provide
interoperability with our customers’ information technology
infrastructures require substantial capital investment and the
devotion of substantial employee resources. We may not
accomplish these development efforts quickly, cost-effectively
or at all. If we fail for any reason to maintain
interoperability, we may experience a weakening in demand for
our products, which would adversely affect our business,
operating results and financial condition.
If we
fail to enhance our brand, our ability to expand our customer
base will be impaired and our operating results may
suffer.
We believe that developing and maintaining awareness of the
Netezza brand is critical to achieving widespread acceptance of
our products and is an important element in attracting new
customers and shortening our sales cycle. We expect the
importance of brand recognition to increase as competition
further develops in our market. Successful promotion of our
brand will depend largely on the effectiveness of our marketing
efforts and our ability to provide customers with reliable and
technically sophisticated products at competitive prices. If
customers do not perceive our products and services to be of
high value, our brand and reputation could be harmed, which
11
could adversely impact our financial results. Despite our best
efforts our brand promotion efforts may not yield increased
revenue sufficient to offset the additional expenses incurred in
our brand-building efforts.
We may
not receive significant revenues from our current research and
development efforts for several years, if at all.
Investment in product development often involves a long payback
cycle. We have made and expect to continue making significant
investments in research and development and related product
opportunities. Accelerated product introductions and short
product life cycles require high levels of expenditures for
research and development that could adversely affect our
operating results if not offset by revenue increases. We believe
that we must continue to dedicate a significant amount of
resources to our research and development efforts to maintain
our competitive position. However, we do not expect to receive
significant revenues from these investments for several years,
if at all.
Our
sales cycles can be long and unpredictable, and our sales
efforts require considerable time and expense, which contribute
to the unpredictability and variability of our financial
performance and may adversely affect our
profitability.
The timing of our revenue is difficult to predict as we
experience extended sales cycles, due in part to our need to
educate our customers about our products and participate in
extended product evaluations and the high purchase price of our
products. In addition, product purchases are often subject to a
variety of customer considerations that may extend the length of
our sales cycle, including customers’ acceptance of our
approach to data warehouse management and their willingness to
replace their existing solutions and supplier relationships,
timing of their budget cycles and approval processes, budget
constraints, extended negotiations, and administrative,
processing and other delays, including those due to general
economic factors. As a result, our sales cycle extends to more
than nine months in some cases, and it is difficult to predict
when or if a sale to a potential customer will occur. All of
these factors can contribute to fluctuations in our quarterly
financial performance and increase the likelihood that our
operating results in a particular quarter will fall below
investor expectations. In addition, the provision of evaluation
units to customers may require significant investment in
inventory in advance of sales of these units, which sales may
not ultimately transpire.
If we are unsuccessful in closing sales after expending
significant resources, or if we experience delays for any of the
reasons discussed above, our future revenues and operating
expenses may be materially adversely affected.
Our
company is growing rapidly and we may be unable to manage our
growth effectively.
Between
January 31, 2005 and
January 31, 2007, the
number of our employees increased from 140 to 225 and our
installed base of customers grew from 15 to 87. In addition,
during that time period our number of office locations has
increased from 3 to 12. We anticipate that further expansion of
our organization and operations will be required to achieve our
growth targets. Our rapid growth has placed, and is expected to
continue to place, a significant strain on our management and
operational infrastructure. Our failure to continue to enhance
our management personnel and policies and our operational and
financial systems and controls in response to our growth could
result in operating inefficiencies that could impair our
competitive position and would increase our costs more than we
had planned. If we are unable to manage our growth effectively,
our business, our reputation and our operating results and
financial condition will be adversely affected.
Our
ability to sell to the U.S. federal government and its
agencies is subject to uncertainties that could have a material
adverse effect on our growth prospects and operating results,
and our contracts with the U.S. federal government contain
certain provisions that may be unfavorable to us.
In fiscal 2007, we derived approximately 5% of our revenue from
the U.S. federal government and its agencies. Our ability
to sell products to the government and its agencies is subject
to uncertainties related to the government’s policies and
funding priorities and commitments as well as our ability to
maintain compliance with applicable government regulations and
other requirements. Any difficulties complying with government
regulations, or changes in government regulations, policies or
priorities, including funding levels through agency or program
12
budget reductions by the U.S. Congress or government
agencies, could harm our ability to sell products to the
government, causing fluctuations in our revenues from this
segment from period to period and resulting in a weakening of
our growth prospects, operating results and financial condition.
Our
contracts with the government and its agencies subject us to
certain risks and give the government and its agencies rights
and remedies not typically found in commercial
contracts,
including rights that allow the government and its agencies to:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
terminate contracts for convenience at any time and for any
reason;
|
| |
| |
•
|
perform routine audits; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
control or prohibit the export of certain of our products.
|
Moreover, some of our
contracts allow the government and its
agencies rights to use, or have others use, patented inventions
developed under those
contracts on behalf of the government.
Some of the
contracts allow the federal government and its
agencies to disclose technical data without constraining the
recipient in how that data is used. The ability of third parties
to use patents and technical data for government purposes
creates the possibility that the government could attempt to
establish additional sources for the products we provide that
stem from these
contracts. It may also allow the government the
ability to negotiate with us to reduce our prices for products
we provide to it. The potential that the government may release
some of the technical data without constraint creates the
possibility that third parties may be able to use this data to
compete with us in the commercial sector.
Our
international operations are subject to additional risks that we
do not face in the United States, which could have an adverse
effect on our operating results.
In fiscal 2007, we derived approximately 24% of our revenue from
customers based outside the United States, and we currently
have sales personnel in five different foreign countries. We
expect our revenue and operations outside the United States will
continue to expand in the future. Our international operations
are subject to a variety of risks that we do not face in the
United States, including:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
difficulties in staffing and managing our foreign offices and
the increased travel, infrastructure and legal and compliance
costs associated with multiple international locations;
|
| |
| |
•
|
general economic conditions in the countries in which we
operate, including seasonal reductions in business activity in
the summer months in Europe, during Lunar New Year in parts of
Asia and in other periods in various individual countries;
|
| |
| |
•
|
longer payment cycles for sales in foreign countries and
difficulties in enforcing contracts and collecting accounts
receivable;
|
| |
| |
•
|
additional withholding taxes or other taxes on our foreign
income, and tariffs or other restrictions on foreign trade or
investment;
|
| |
| |
•
|
imposition of, or unexpected adverse changes in, foreign laws or
regulatory requirements, many of which differ from those in the
United States;
|
| |
| |
•
|
increased length of time for shipping and acceptance of our
products;
|
| |
| |
•
|
difficulties in repatriating overseas earnings;
|
| |
| |
•
|
increased exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk;
|
| |
| |
•
|
reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some
countries;
|
| |
| |
•
|
costs and delays associated with developing products in multiple
languages; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
political unrest, war, incidents of terrorism, or responses to
such events.
|
Our overall success in international markets depends, in part,
on our ability to succeed in differing legal, regulatory,
economic, social and political conditions. We may not be
successful in developing and implementing policies and
strategies that will be effective in managing these risks in
each country where we do business. Our
13
failure to manage these risks successfully could harm our
international operations, reduce our international sales and
increase our costs, thus adversely affecting our business,
operating results and financial condition.
Our
future revenue growth will depend in part on our ability to
further develop our indirect sales channel, and our inability to
effectively do so will impair our ability to grow our revenues
as we anticipate.
Our future revenue growth will depend in part on the continued
development of our indirect sales channel to complement our
direct salesforce. Our indirect sales channel includes
resellers, systems integration firms and analytic service
providers. In fiscal 2007, we derived approximately 18% of our
revenue from our indirect sales channel. We plan to continue to
invest in our indirect sales channels, by expanding upon and
developing new relationships with resellers, systems integration
firms and analytic service providers. While the development of
our indirect sales channel is a priority for us, we cannot
predict the extent to which we will be able to attract and
retain financially stable, motivated indirect channel partners.
Additionally, due in part to the complexity and innovative
nature of our products, our channel partners may not be
successful in marketing and selling our products. Our indirect
channel may be adversely affected by disruptions in
relationships between our channel partners and their customers,
as well as by competition between our channel partners or
between our channel partners and our direct salesforce. In
addition our reputation could suffer as a result of the conduct
and manner of marketing and sales by our channel partners. Our
agreements with our channel partners are generally not exclusive
and may be terminated without cause. If we fail to effectively
develop and manage our indirect channel for any of these
reasons, we may have difficulty attaining our growth targets.
Our
ability to sell our products and retain customers is highly
dependent on the quality of our maintenance and support services
offerings, and our failure to offer high-quality maintenance and
support could have a material adverse effect on our operating
results.
Most of our customers purchase maintenance and support services
from us, which represents a significant portion of our revenue
(approximately 19% of our revenue in fiscal 2007). Customer
satisfaction with our maintenance and support services is
critical for the successful marketing and sale of our products
and the success of our business. In addition to our support
staff and installation and technical account management teams,
we have developed a worldwide service relationship with
Hewlett-Packard to provide
on-site
hardware service to our customers. Although we believe
Hewlett-Packard and any other third-party service provider we
utilize in the future will offer a high level of service
consistent with our internal customer support services, we
cannot assure you that they will continue to devote the
resources necessary to provide our customers with effective
technical support. In addition, if we are unable to renew our
service agreement with Hewlett-Packard or any other third-party
service provider we utilize in the future or such agreements are
terminated, we may be unable to establish alternative
relationships on a timely basis or on terms acceptable to us, if
at all. If we or our service partners are unable to provide
effective maintenance and support services, it could adversely
affect our ability to sell our products and harm our reputation
with current and potential customers.
Our
products are highly technical and may contain undetected
software or hardware defects, which could cause data
unavailability, loss or corruption that might result in
liability to our customers and harm to our reputation and
business.
Our products are highly technical and complex and are often used
to store and manage data critical to our customers’
business operations. Our products may contain undetected errors,
defects or security vulnerabilities that could result in data
unavailability, loss or corruption or other harm to our
customers. Some errors in our products may only be discovered
after the products have been installed and used by customers.
Any errors, defects or security vulnerabilities discovered in
our products after commercial release or that are caused by
another vendor’s products with which we interoperate but
are nevertheless attributed to us by our customers, as well as
any computer virus or human error on the part of our customer
support or other personnel, that result in a customer’s
data being misappropriated, unavailable, lost or corrupted could
have significant adverse consequences, including:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
loss of customers;
|
| |
| |
•
|
negative publicity and damage to our reputation;
|
14
|
|
|
| |
•
|
diversion of our engineering, customer service and other
resources;
|
| |
| |
•
|
increased service and warranty costs; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
loss or delay in revenue or market acceptance of our products.
|
Any of these events could adversely affect our business,
operating results and financial condition. In addition, there is
a possibility that we could face claims for product liability,
tort or breach of warranty, including claims from both our
customers and our distribution partners. The cost of defending
such a lawsuit, regardless of its merit, could be substantial
and could divert management’s attention from ongoing
operations of
the company. In addition, if our business
liability insurance coverage proves inadequate with respect to a
claim or future coverage is unavailable on acceptable terms or
at all we may be liable for payment of substantial damages. Any
or all of these potential consequences could have an adverse
impact on our operating results and financial condition.
It is
difficult to predict our future capital needs and we may be
unable to obtain additional financing that we may need, which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating
results and financial condition.
We believe that our current balance of cash and cash
equivalents, together with borrowings available under our bank
line of credit and the net proceeds to us of this offering, will
be sufficient to fund our projected operating requirements,
including anticipated capital expenditures, for at least the
next 12 months. We may need to raise additional funds
subsequent to that or sooner if we are presented with unforeseen
circumstances or opportunities in order to, among other things:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
develop or enhance our products;
|
| |
| |
•
|
support additional capital expenditures;
|
| |
| |
•
|
respond to competitive pressures;
|
| |
| |
•
|
fund operating losses in future periods; or
|
| |
| |
•
|
take advantage of acquisition or expansion opportunities.
|
Any required additional financing may not be available on terms
acceptable to us, or at all. If we raise additional funds by
issuing equity securities, you may experience significant
dilution of your ownership interest, and the newly issued
securities may have rights senior to those of the holders of our
common stock. If we raise additional funds by obtaining loans
from third parties, the terms of those financing arrangements
may include negative covenants or other restrictions on our
business that could impair our operational flexibility and would
also require us to fund additional interest expense, which would
harm our profitability. Holders of debt would also have rights,
preferences or privileges senior to those of holders of our
common stock.
If we
are unable to protect our intellectual property rights, our
competitive position could be harmed or we could be required to
incur significant expenses to enforce our rights.
Our success is dependent in part on obtaining, maintaining and
enforcing our intellectual property and other proprietary
rights. We rely on a combination of trade secret, patent,
copyright and trademark laws and contractual provisions with
employees and third parties, all of which offer only limited
protection. Despite our efforts to protect our intellectual
property and proprietary information, we may not be successful
in doing so, for several reasons. We cannot be certain that our
pending patent applications will result in the issuance of
patents or whether the examination process will require us to
narrow our claims. Even if patents are issued to us, they may be
contested, or our competitors may be able to develop similar or
superior technologies without infringing our patents.
Although we enter into confidentiality, assignments of
proprietary rights and license agreements, as appropriate, with
our employees and third parties, including our
contract
engineering firm, and generally control access to and
distribution of our technologies, documentation and other
proprietary information, we cannot be certain that the steps we
take to prevent unauthorized use of our intellectual property
rights are sufficient to prevent their misappropriation,
particularly in foreign countries where laws or law enforcement
practices may not protect our intellectual property rights as
fully as in the United States.
15
Even in those instances where we have determined that another
party is breaching our intellectual property and other
proprietary rights, enforcing our legal rights with respect to
such breach may be expensive and difficult. We may need to
engage in litigation to enforce or defend our intellectual
property and other proprietary rights, which could result in
substantial costs and diversion of management resources.
Further, many of our current and potential competitors are
substantially larger than we are and have the ability to
dedicate substantially greater resources to defending any claims
by us that they have breached our intellectual property rights.
Our
products may be subject to open source licenses, which may
restrict how we use or distribute our solutions or require that
we release the source code of certain technologies subject to
those licenses.
Some of our proprietary technologies incorporate open source
software. For example, the open source database drivers that we
use may be subject to an open source license. The GNU General
Public License and other open source licenses typically require
that source code subject to the license be released or made
available to the public. Such open source licenses typically
mandate that proprietary software, when combined in specific
ways with open source software, become subject to the open
source license. We take steps to ensure that our proprietary
software is not combined with, or does not incorporate, open
source software in ways that would require our proprietary
software to be subject to an open source license. However, few
courts have interpreted the open source licenses, and the manner
in which these licenses may be interpreted and enforced is
therefore subject to uncertainty. If these licenses were to be
interpreted in a manner different than we interpret them, we may
find ourselves in violation of such licenses. While our customer
contracts prohibit the use of our technology in any way that
would cause it to violate an open source license, our customers
could, in violation of our agreement, use our technology in a
manner prohibited by an open source license.
In addition, we rely on multiple software engineers to design
our proprietary products and technologies. Although we take
steps to ensure that our engineers do not include open source
software in the products and technologies they design, we may
not exercise complete control over the development efforts of
our engineers and we cannot be certain that they have not
incorporated open source software into our proprietary
technologies. In the event that portions of our proprietary
technology are determined to be subject to an open source
license, we might be required to publicly release the affected
portions of our source code, which could reduce or eliminate our
ability to commercialize our products.
We may
engage in future acquisitions that could disrupt our business,
cause dilution to our stockholders, reduce our financial
resources and result in increased expenses.
In the future, we may acquire companies, assets or technologies
in an effort to complement our existing offerings or enhance our
market position. We have not made any acquisitions to date. Any
future acquisitions we make could subject us to a number of
risks, including:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the purchase price we pay could significantly deplete our cash
reserves, impair our future operating flexibility or result in
dilution to our existing stockholders;
|
| |
| |
•
|
we may find that the acquired company, assets or technology do
not further improve our financial and strategic position as
planned;
|
| |
| |
•
|
we may find that we overpaid for the company, asset or
technology, or that the economic conditions underlying our
acquisition have changed;
|
| |
| |
•
|
we may have difficulty integrating the operations and personnel
of the acquired company;
|
| |
| |
•
|
we may have difficulty retaining the employees with the
technical skills needed to enhance and provide services with
respect to the acquired assets or technologies;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the acquisition may be viewed negatively by customers, financial
markets or investors;
|
| |
| |
•
|
we may have difficulty incorporating the acquired technologies
or products with our existing product lines;
|
| |
| |
•
|
we may encounter difficulty entering and competing in new
product or geographic markets;
|
| |
| |
•
|
we may encounter a competitive response, including price
competition or intellectual property litigation;
|
16
|
|
|
| |
•
|
we may have product liability, customer liability or
intellectual property liability associated with the sale of the
acquired company’s products;
|
| |
| |
•
|
we may be subject to litigation by terminated employees or third
parties;
|
| |
| |
•
|
we may incur debt, one-time write-offs, such as acquired
in-process research and development costs, and restructuring
charges;
|
| |
| |
•
|
we may acquire goodwill and other intangible assets that are
subject to impairment tests, which could result in future
impairment charges;
|
| |
| |
•
|
our ongoing business and management’s attention may be
disrupted or diverted by transition or integration issues and
the complexity of managing geographically or culturally diverse
enterprises; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
our due diligence process may fail to identify significant
existing issues with the target company’s product quality,
product architecture, financial disclosures, accounting
practices, internal controls, legal contingencies, intellectual
property and other matters.
|
These factors could have a material adverse effect on our
business, operating results and financial condition.
From time to time, we may enter into negotiations for
acquisitions or investments that are not ultimately consummated.
Such negotiations could result in significant diversion of
management time, as well as substantial
out-of-pocket
costs, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, operating results and financial condition.
We
currently rely on a single contract manufacturer to assemble our
products, and our failure to manage our relationship with our
contract manufacturer successfully could negatively impact our
ability to sell our products.
We currently rely on a single
contract manufacturer, Sanmina-SCI
Corporation (referred to in this prospectus as
“Sanmina”), to assemble our products, manage our
supply chain and participate in negotiations regarding component
costs. While we believe that our use of Sanmina provides
benefits to our business, our reliance on Sanmina reduces our
control over the assembly process, exposing us to risks,
including reduced control over quality assurance, production
costs and product supply. These risks could become more acute if
we are successful in our efforts to increase revenue. If we fail
to manage our relationship with Sanmina effectively, or if
Sanmina experiences delays, disruptions, capacity constraints or
quality control problems in its operations, our ability to ship
products to our customers could be impaired and our competitive
position and reputation could be harmed. In addition, we are
required to provide forecasts to Sanmina regarding product
demand and production levels. If we inaccurately forecast demand
for our products, we may have excess or inadequate inventory or
incur cancellation charges or penalties, which could adversely
impact our operating results and financial condition.
Additionally, Sanmina can terminate our agreement for any reason
upon 90 days’ notice or for cause upon
30 days’ notice. If we are required to change
contract
manufacturers or assume internal manufacturing operations due to
any termination of the agreement with Sanmina, we may lose
revenue, experience manufacturing delays, incur increased costs
or otherwise damage our customer relationships. We cannot assure
you that we will be able to establish an alternative
manufacturing relationship on acceptable terms or at all.
We
depend on a continued supply of components for our products from
third-party suppliers, and if shortages of these components
arise, we may not be able to secure enough components to build
new products to meet customer demand or we may be forced to pay
higher prices for these components.
We rely on a limited number of suppliers for several key
components utilized in the assembly of our products, including
disk drives and microprocessors. Although in many cases we use
standard components for our products, some of these components
may only be purchased or may only be available from a single
supplier. In addition, we maintain relatively low inventory and
acquire components only as needed, and neither we nor our
contract manufacturer enter into long-term supply
contracts for
these components and none of our third-party suppliers is
obligated to supply products to us for any specific period or in
any specific quantities, except as may be provided in a
particular purchase order. Our industry has experienced
component shortages and delivery delays in the past, and
17
we may experience shortages or delays of critical components in
the future as a result of strong demand in the industry or other
factors. If shortages or delays arise, we may be unable to ship
our products to our customers on time, or at all, and increased
costs for these components that we could not pass on to our
customers would negatively impact our operating margins. For
example, new generations of disk drives are often in short
supply, which may limit our ability to procure these disk
drives. In addition, disk drives represent a significant portion
of our cost of revenue, and the price of various kinds of disk
drives is subject to substantial volatility in the market. Many
of the other components required to build our systems are also
occasionally in short supply. Therefore, we may not be able to
secure enough components at reasonable prices or of acceptable
quality to build new products, resulting in an inability to meet
customer demand or our own operating goals, which could
adversely affect our customer relationships, business, operating
results and financial condition.
We
currently rely on a contract engineering firm for quality
assurance and product integration engineering.
In addition to our internal research and development staff, we
have contracted with Persistent Systems Pvt. Ltd. (referred to
in this prospectus as
“Persistent Systems”), located
in Pune, India, to employ a dedicated team of over 50 engineers
focused on quality assurance and product integration
engineering. Persistent Systems can terminate our agreement for
any reason upon 15 days’ notice. If we were required
to change our
contract engineering firm, including due to a
termination of the agreement with Persistent Systems, we may
experience delays, incur increased costs or otherwise damage our
customer relationships. We cannot assure you that we will be
able to establish an alternative
contract engineering firm
relationship on acceptable terms or at all.
Future
interpretations of existing accounting standards could adversely
affect our operating results.
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States,
or GAAP, are subject to interpretation by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants, or AICPA, the SEC and various
other bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate
accounting principles. A change in these principles or
interpretations could have a significant effect on our reported
operating results, and they could affect the reporting of
transactions completed before the announcement of a change. For
example, we recognize our product revenue in accordance with
AICPA Statement of Position, or
SOP 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, and related amendments and
interpretations contained in
SOP 98-9, Software
Revenue Recognition with Respect to Certain Transactions. The
AICPA and its Software Revenue Recognition Task Force continue
to issue interpretations and guidance for applying the relevant
accounting standards to a wide range of sales
contract terms and
business arrangements that are prevalent in software licensing
arrangements and arrangements for the sale of hardware products
that contain more than an insignificant amount of software.
Future interpretations of existing accounting standards,
including
SOP 97-2 and
SOP 98-9,
or changes in our business practices could result in delays in
our recognition of revenue that may have a material adverse
effect on our operating results. For example, we may in the
future have to defer recognition of revenue for a transaction
that involves:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
undelivered elements for which we do not have vendor-specific
objective evidence of fair value;
|
| |
| |
•
|
requirements that we deliver services for significant
enhancements and modifications to customize our software for a
particular customer; or
|
| |
| |
•
|
material acceptance criteria.
|
Because of these factors and other specific requirements under
GAAP for recognition of software revenue, we must include
specific terms in customer
contracts in order to recognize
revenue when we initially deliver products or perform services.
Negotiation of such terms could extend our sales cycle, and,
under some circumstances, we may accept terms and conditions
that do not permit revenue recognition at the time of delivery.
If we
fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls, our
ability to produce accurate financial statements could be
impaired, which could adversely affect our operating results,
our ability to operate our business and investors’ and
customers’ views of us.
Ensuring that we have adequate internal financial and accounting
controls and procedures in place so that we can produce accurate
financial statements on a timely basis is a costly and
time-consuming effort that needs to be re-
18
evaluated frequently. We are in the process of documenting,
reviewing and, if appropriate, improving our internal controls
and procedures in anticipation of being a public company and
eventually being subject to the requirements of Section 404
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related SEC rules
concerning internal control over financial reporting, which will
in the future require annual management assessments, and an
audit by our independent registered public accounting firm, of
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting. Implementing any appropriate changes to our internal
controls may entail substantial costs in order to modify our
existing financial and accounting systems, take a significant
period of time to complete, and distract our officers, directors
and employees from the operation of our business. Moreover,
these changes may not be effective in maintaining the adequacy
or effectiveness of our internal controls. Any failure to
maintain effective internal controls, or a consequent inability
to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis in
accordance with SEC and NASDAQ rules, which we will be subject
to as a public company, could increase our operating costs,
materially impair our ability to operate our business, result in
SEC investigations and penalties and lead to the delisting of
our common stock from the NASDAQ Global Market. The resulting
damage to our reputation in the marketplace and our financial
credibility could significantly impair our sales and marketing
efforts with customers. In addition, investors’ perceptions
that our internal controls are inadequate or that we are unable
to produce accurate financial statements may seriously affect
our stock price.
In the current public company environment, officers and
directors are subject to increased scrutiny and may be subject
to increased risk of liability. As a result, it may be more
difficult for us to attract and retain qualified individuals to
serve on our board of directors or as our executive officers.
This could negatively impact our future success.
We are
subject to governmental export controls that could impair our
ability to compete in international markets.
Our products are subject to U.S. export controls and may be
exported outside the United States only with the required level
of export license or through an export license exception.
Changes in our products or changes in export regulations may
create delays in the introduction of our products in
international markets, prevent our customers with international
operations from deploying our products throughout their global
systems or, in some cases, prevent the export of our products to
certain countries altogether. Any change in export regulations
or related legislation, shift in approach to the enforcement or
scope of existing regulations or change in the countries,
persons or technologies targeted by these regulations could
result in decreased use of our products by, or in our decreased
ability to export or sell our products to, existing or potential
customers with international operations.
Adverse
changes in economic conditions and reduced information
technology spending may negatively impact our
business.
Our business depends on the overall demand for information
technology and on the economic health of our current and
prospective customers and the geographic regions in which we
operate. In addition, the purchase of our products is often
discretionary and may involve a significant commitment of
capital and other resources. As a result, weak economic
conditions or a reduction in information technology spending
could adversely impact demand for our products and therefore our
business, operating results and financial condition.
Risks
Related to this Offering and Ownership of Our Common
Stock
The
trading price of our common stock is likely to be volatile, and
you might not be able to sell your shares at or above the
initial public offering price.
Our common stock has no prior trading history. The initial
public offering price for our common stock will be determined
through negotiations with the underwriters. The trading prices
of the securities of newly public companies have often been
highly volatile and may vary significantly from the initial
public offering price. In addition, the trading price of our
common stock will be susceptible to fluctuations in the market
due to numerous factors, many of which may be beyond our
control, including:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
changes in operating performance and stock market valuations of
other technology companies generally or those that sell data
warehouse solutions in particular;
|
19
|
|
|
| |
•
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the financial guidance that we may provide to the public, any
changes in such guidance, or our failure to meet such guidance;
|
| |
| |
•
|
changes in financial estimates by securities analysts, our
failure to meet such estimates, or failure of analysts to
initiate or maintain coverage of our stock;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the public’s response to our press releases or other public
announcements by us, including our filings with the SEC;
|
| |
| |
•
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant technical
innovations, customer wins or losses, acquisitions, strategic
partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
|
| |
| |
•
|
introduction of technologies or product enhancements that reduce
the need for our products;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the loss of key personnel;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the development and sustainability of an active trading market
for our common stock;
|
| |
| |
•
|
lawsuits threatened or filed against us;
|
| |
| |
•
|
future sales of our common stock by our officers or
directors; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
other events or factors affecting the economy generally,
including those resulting from political unrest, war, incidents
of terrorism or responses to such events.
|
The trading price of our common stock might also decline in
reaction to events that affect other companies in our industry
even if these events do not directly affect us. As a result of
these and other factors, you might not be able to sell your
shares at or above the price you pay for them in the initial
public offering.
Some companies that have had volatile market prices for their
securities have had securities class actions filed against them.
If a suit were filed against us, regardless of its merits or
outcome, it would likely result in substantial costs and divert
management’s attention and resources. This could have a
material adverse effect on our business, operating results and
financial condition.
An
active trading market may not develop for our common
stock.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for
shares of our common stock, and we cannot assure you that one
will develop or be sustained after this offering. If a market
does not develop or is not sustained, it may be difficult for
you to sell your shares of our common stock at an attractive
price or at all.
Future
sales of shares by existing stockholders could cause our stock
price to decline.
Once a trading market develops for our common stock, many of our
stockholders will have an opportunity to sell their common stock
for the first time, subject to the contractual
lock-up
agreements and other restrictions on resale discussed in this
prospectus. Sales by our existing stockholders of a substantial
number of shares of common stock in the public market, or the
threat that substantial sales might occur, could cause the
market price of the common stock to decrease significantly.
These factors could also make it difficult for us to raise
additional capital by selling our common stock. See
“Shares Eligible for Future Sale” for further
details regarding the number of shares eligible for sale in the
public market after this offering.
If
securities or industry analysts do not publish research or
publish unfavorable research about our business, our stock price
and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will depend in part on
any research reports that securities or industry analysts
publish about us or our business. After this offering, if no
securities or industry analysts initiate coverage of our
company, the trading price for our stock may be negatively
impacted. In the event securities or industry analysts cover our
company and one or more of these analysts downgrade our stock or
publish unfavorable reports about our business, our stock price
would likely decline. In addition, if any securities or industry
analysts cease coverage of
20
our company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand
for our stock could decrease, which could cause our stock price
and trading volume to decline.
As a
new investor, you will experience substantial dilution as a
result of this offering.
The assumed initial public offering price per share is
substantially higher than the pro forma net tangible book value
per share of our common stock immediately prior to this
offering. As a result, new investors purchasing shares of our
common stock in this offering will experience immediate dilution
of $ per share in pro forma
net tangible book value per share from the price they paid, at
an assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share, which is the
midpoint of the range listed on the cover page of this
prospectus. In addition, investors who purchase shares in this
offering will contribute approximately % of the total
amount of equity capital raised by us through the date of this
offering, but such investors will only own
approximately % of our outstanding shares. This
dilution is due to the fact that our earlier investors paid
substantially less than the initial public offering price when
they purchased their shares of
the company. In addition, we have
issued options and warrants to acquire common stock at prices
significantly below the assumed initial public offering price.
To the extent any outstanding options and warrants are
exercised, there will be further dilution to new investors in
this offering.
We do
not currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock and
your ability to achieve a return on your investment will
therefore depend on appreciation in the price of our common
stock.
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common
stock and do not currently expect to pay any cash dividends for
the foreseeable future. Our loan agreements with our lenders
contain provisions prohibiting us from paying any dividends
during the term of the agreements without our lenders’
prior written consent. We intend to use our future earnings, if
any, in the operation and expansion of our business.
Accordingly, you are not likely to receive any dividends on your
common stock for the foreseeable future, and your ability to
achieve a return on your investment will therefore depend on
appreciation in the price of our common stock.
Provisions
in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law
might discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our
company or changes in our management and, therefore, may
negatively impact the trading price of our common
stock.
Provisions of our
certificate of incorporation and our
bylaws
may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other
change in control that stockholders may consider favorable,
including transactions in which you might otherwise receive a
premium for your shares of our common stock. These provisions
may also prevent or frustrate attempts by our stockholders to
replace or remove our management. These provisions:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
establish a classified board of directors so that not all
members of our board are elected at one time;
|
| |
| |
•
|
provide that directors may only be removed “for cause;”
|
| |
| |
•
|
authorize the issuance of “blank check” preferred
stock that our board of directors could issue to increase the
number of outstanding shares and to discourage a takeover
attempt;
|
| |
| |
•
|
eliminate the ability of our stockholders to call special
meetings of stockholders;
|
| |
| |
•
|
prohibit stockholder action by written consent, which has the
effect of requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at a
meeting of stockholders;
|
| |
| |
•
|
provide that the board of directors is expressly authorized to
make, alter or repeal our bylaws; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
establish advance notice requirements for nominations for
election to our board of directors or for proposing matters that
can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.
|
In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law may discourage, delay or prevent a change in
control of
our company by prohibiting stockholders owning in
excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock from merging or
combining with us during a specified period unless certain
approvals are obtained.
21
Our
management will have broad discretion as to the use of the net
proceeds from this offering and might not apply the proceeds in
ways that increase the value of your investment or in ways with
which you agree.
We expect to use a portion of the net proceeds to us from this
offering to repay the amounts outstanding under our outstanding
credit facilities. We intend to use the balance of the net
proceeds for unspecified general corporate purposes, which may
include acquisitions of companies, assets or technologies. Our
management will have broad discretion over the use of the net
proceeds from this offering, and you will be relying on the
judgment of our management regarding the application of these
net proceeds. While it is the intention of our management to use
the net proceeds from the offering in the best interests of the
company, our management might not apply the net proceeds from
this offering in ways that increase the value of your investment
or in ways with which you agree. In addition, the market price
of our common stock may fall if the market does not view our use
of the net proceeds from this offering favorably.
Insiders
will continue to own a significant portion of our outstanding
common stock following this offering and will therefore have
substantial control over us and will be able to influence
corporate matters.
Upon completion of this offering, our executive officers,
directors and their affiliates will beneficially own, in the
aggregate, approximately % of our
outstanding common stock. As a result, our executive officers,
directors and their affiliates will be able to exercise
significant influence over all matters requiring stockholder
approval, including the election of directors and approval of
significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other
sale of
our company or its assets. This concentration of
ownership could limit your ability to influence corporate
matters and may have the effect of delaying or preventing
another party from acquiring control over us.
22
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements. All
statements other than statements of historical facts contained
in this prospectus, including statements regarding our future
results of operations and financial position, business strategy
and plans and objectives of management for future operations,
are forward-looking statements. In many cases, you can identify
forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,”
“will,” “should,” “expects,”
“plans,” “anticipates,” “could,”
“intends,” “target,” “projects,”
“contemplates,” “believes,”
“estimates,” “predicts,”
“potential” or “continue” or other similar
words.
These forward-looking statements are only predictions. These
statements relate to future events or our future financial
performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties
and other important factors that may cause our actual results,
levels of activity, performance or achievements to materially
differ from any future results, levels of activity, performance
or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking
statements. We have described in the “Risk Factors”
section and elsewhere in this prospectus the principal risks and
uncertainties that we believe could cause actual results to
differ from these forward-looking statements. Because
forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and
uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified,
you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as
guarantees of future events.
The forward-looking statements in this prospectus represent our
views as of the date of this prospectus. We anticipate that
subsequent events and developments will cause our views to
change. However, while we may elect to update these
forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we have
no current intention of doing so except to the extent required
by applicable law. You should, therefore, not rely on these
forward-looking statements as representing our views as of any
date subsequent to the date of this prospectus.
This prospectus also contains estimates and other statistical
data made by independent parties and by us relating to market
size and growth and other data about our industry. This data
involves a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are
cautioned not to give undue weight to such estimates. We have
not independently verified the statistical and other industry
data generated by independent parties and contained in this
prospectus and, accordingly, we cannot guarantee their accuracy
or completeness. In addition, projections, assumptions and
estimates of our future performance and the future performance
of the industries in which we operate are necessarily subject to
a high degree of uncertainty and risk.
23
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We estimate that the net proceeds to us from this offering will
be approximately $ million,
assuming an initial public offering price of
$ per share, which is the
midpoint of the range listed on the cover page of this
prospectus, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts
and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. A
$1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering
price of $ per share would
increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this offering by
approximately $ million,
assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as listed on
the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same. We will not
receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares of our
common stock by the selling stockholders.
We intend to use the net proceeds to us from this offering for
working capital and other general corporate purposes, including
the development of new products, sales and marketing activities,
capital expenditures and the costs of operating as a public
company. We also intend to use a portion of the net proceeds to
us to repay our outstanding debt under two loan agreements. As
of
January 31, 2007 we had $6.5 million outstanding
under a term loan credit facility, dated
June 14, 2005,
with Silicon Valley Bank, as agent for certain other lenders,
including Gold Hill Venture Lending. All unpaid principal and
accrued interest under this loan is due and payable in full on
June 1, 2009. Under the terms of this loan, the interest
rate for each advance is the prime rate plus 4% and was between
10% to 12% at the time of each advance. In addition, on
January 31, 2007 we entered into a revolving credit
facility with Silicon Valley Bank to borrow up to an additional
$15 million. All outstanding debt incurred under this
revolving facility will become payable on
January 30, 2008.
Our interest rate under this revolving facility is 1% below the
prime rate, and on
January 31, 2007 was 7.25%. As of
February 28, 2007, there was nothing outstanding under this
revolving credit facility.
We may use a portion of the net proceeds to us to expand our
current business through acquisitions of complementary
companies, assets or technologies. We currently have no
agreements or commitments for any acquisitions. In addition, the
amount and timing of what we actually spend for these purposes
may vary significantly and will depend on a number of factors,
including our future revenue and cash generated by operations.
Accordingly, our management will have broad discretion in
applying the net proceeds of this offering.
Some of the principal purposes of this offering are to create a
public market for our common stock, increase our visibility in
the marketplace, provide liquidity to existing stockholders and
obtain additional working capital. A public market for our
common stock will facilitate future access to public equity
markets and enhance our ability to use our common stock as a
means of attracting and retaining key employees and as
consideration for acquisitions.
Pending the uses described above, we intend to invest the net
proceeds to us in investment-grade, interest-bearing securities
including corporate, financial institution, federal agency and
U.S. government obligations.
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital
stock and do not expect to pay any cash dividends for the
foreseeable future. We intend to use future earnings, if any, in
the operation and expansion of our business. Payment of future
cash dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board
of directors after taking into account various factors,
including our financial condition, recent and expected operating
results, current and anticipated cash needs, and restrictions
imposed by lenders, if any.
Our term loan and security agreement, dated
June 14, 2005
with Silicon Valley Bank and certain other lenders and our loan
and security agreement with Silicon Valley Bank dated
January 31, 2007 each contains a provision prohibiting us
from paying any dividends during the term of the agreements
without Silicon Valley Bank’s prior written consent.
24
CAPITALIZATION
|
|
|
| |
•
|
on an actual basis;
|
| |
| |
•
|
on a pro forma basis to give effect to the automatic conversion
of all of our outstanding convertible preferred stock into
common stock upon the closing of this offering, the
one-for-two
reverse split of our common stock effected prior to the closing
of this offering, and the filing of our second amended and
restated certificate of incorporation as of the closing date of
this offering; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
on a pro forma as adjusted basis to give effect to the issuance
and sale by us
of shares
of our common stock in this offering at an assumed initial
public offering price of
$ per share, which is the
midpoint of the range listed on the cover page of this
prospectus, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts
and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
|
You should read the following table together with our
consolidated financial statements and the related notes
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus and
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” and other financial
information appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
as Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
5,018
|
|
|
$
|
5,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable to bank, net of
current portion
|
|
$
|
4,099
|
|
|
$
|
4,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible redeemable preferred
stock, par value $0.001 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A convertible
redeemable preferred stock, 17,280,000 shares authorized,
17,200,000 shares issued and outstanding, actual; no shares
authorized, issued or outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as
adjusted
|
|
|
12,805
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B convertible
redeemable preferred stock, 29,425,622 shares authorized,
issued and outstanding, actual; no shares authorized, issued or
outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
35,245
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series C convertible
redeemable preferred stock, authorized, 23,058,151 shares
issued and outstanding, actual; no shares authorized, issued or
outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
25,700
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series D convertible
redeemable preferred stock, 8,147,452 shares authorized,
7,901,961 shares issued and outstanding, actual; no shares
authorized, issued or outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as
adjusted
|
|
|
23,381
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value
$0.001 per share, 150,000,000 shares authorized,
7,542,372 shares issued, actual; 500,000,000 shares
authorized, 46,317,219 shares issued, pro forma; and
500,000,000 shares
authorized, shares
issued, pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value
$0.001 per share; no shares authorized issued or
outstanding, actual; 5,000,000 shares authorized and no
shares issued or outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(284
|
)
|
|
|
(284
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
97,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(80,833
|
)
|
|
|
(80,833
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
(deficit)
|
|
|
(81,123
|
)
|
|
|
16,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization (including
note payable, net of current portion)
|
|
$
|
20,107
|
|
|
$
|
20,107
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of $ per share
would increase (decrease) total stockholders’ equity by
$ million, assuming that the
number of shares offered by us, as listed on the cover page of
this prospectus, remains the same.
25
The table above excludes (on a pro forma and pro forma as
adjusted basis):
|
|
|
| |
•
|
7,441,697 shares of our common stock issuable upon the
exercise of stock options outstanding as of January 31,
2007, at a weighted average exercise price of $1.66 per
share;
|
| |
| |
•
|
4,102,795 shares of our common stock reserved as of
January 31, 2007 for future issuance under our stock
compensation plans;
|
| |
| |
•
|
312,781 shares of our common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants outstanding as of January 31, 2007, at
a weighted average exercise price of $1.26 per share; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
38,750 shares of unvested restricted common stock.
|
26
DILUTION
If you invest in our common stock in this offering, your
ownership interest will be immediately diluted to the extent of
the difference between the initial public offering price per
share and the net tangible book value per share of our common
stock after this offering. Our pro forma net tangible book value
as of
January 31, 2007, was $16.0 million, or
$0.35 per share of our common stock. Pro forma net tangible
book value per share represents the amount of our total tangible
assets less our total liabilities, divided by the total number
of shares of our common stock outstanding, after giving effect
to the automatic conversion of all of our outstanding
convertible preferred stock into common stock upon the closing
of this offering and the
one-for-two
reverse split of our common stock effected prior to the closing
of this offering.
After giving effect to the sale by us
of shares
of our common stock in this offering at an assumed initial
public offering price of
$ per share, which is the
midpoint of the range listed on the cover page of this
prospectus, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts
and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us,
our pro forma net tangible book value as of
January 31,
2007 would have been approximately
$ million, or
$ per share of our common
stock. This amount represents an immediate increase in our pro
forma net tangible book value of
$ per share to our existing
stockholders and an immediate dilution in our pro forma net
tangible book value of $ per
share to new investors purchasing shares of our common stock in
this offering at the assumed initial public offering price.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table illustrates
this dilution on a per share basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed initial public offering
price per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase per share attributable to
this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value
per share after this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per share to new investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of $ per share
would increase (decrease) our pro forma net tangible book value
per share after this offering by approximately
$ and would increase (decrease)
dilution per share to new investors by approximately
$ , assuming that the number of
shares offered by us, as listed on the cover page of this
prospectus, remains the same. In addition, to the extent any
outstanding options or warrants are exercised, new investors
will experience further dilution.
The following table summarizes, as of
January 31, 2007, the
number of shares purchased or to be purchased from us, the total
consideration paid or to be paid to us, and the average price
per share paid or to be paid to us by existing stockholders and
new investors purchasing shares of our common stock in this
offering at an assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share, which is the
midpoint of the range listed on the cover page of this
prospectus, before deducting estimated underwriting discounts
and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
As the table below shows, new investors purchasing shares of our
common stock in this offering will pay an average price per
share substantially higher than our existing stockholders paid.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Total Consideration
|
|
|
Price Per
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
|
Existing stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
New investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of $ per share
would increase (decrease) the total consideration paid to us by
new investors by $ million
and increase (decrease) the percent of total consideration paid
to us by new investors by %
assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as listed on
the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same.
The number of shares purchased from us by existing stockholders
is based on 46,216,907 shares of our common stock
outstanding as of
January 31, 2007 after giving effect to
the automatic conversion of all of our
27
outstanding convertible preferred stock into common stock upon
the closing of this offering and the
one-for-two
reverse split of our common stock effected prior to the closing
of this offering. This number excludes:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
7,441,697 shares of our common stock issuable upon the
exercise of stock options outstanding as of January 31,
2007, at a weighted average exercise price of $1.66 per
share;
|
| |
| |
•
|
4,102,795 shares of our common stock reserved as of
January 31, 2007 for future issuance under our stock
compensation plans; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
312,781 shares of our common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants outstanding as of January 31, 2007, at
a weighted average exercise price of $1.26 per share.
|
If all our outstanding stock options and outstanding warrants
had been exercised as of
January 31, 2007, our pro forma
net tangible book value as of
January 31, 2007 would have
been approximately $ million
or $ per share of our common
stock, and the pro forma net tangible book value after giving
effect to this offering would have been
$ per share, representing
dilution in our pro forma net tangible book value per share to
new investors of $ .
28
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following consolidated statement of operations data for the
fiscal years ended
January 31, 2005,
January 31, 2006
and
January 31, 2007 and consolidated balance sheet data as
of
January 31, 2006 and
January 31, 2007 have been
derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and
the related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. The
following consolidated statement of operations data for the
fiscal years ended
January 31, 2003 and
January 31,
2004 and consolidated balance sheet data as of
January 31,
2003,
January 31, 2004 and
January 31, 2005 have been
derived from our audited consolidated financial statements that
do not appear in this prospectus. The financial data set forth
below should be read together with our consolidated financial
statements, the related notes and
“Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. Our
historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results
to be expected for any future period.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of
Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
13,036
|
|
|
$
|
30,908
|
|
|
$
|
45,508
|
|
|
$
|
64,632
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
5,121
|
|
|
|
8,343
|
|
|
|
14,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13,633
|
|
|
|
36,029
|
|
|
|
53,851
|
|
|
|
79,621
|
|
|
Cost of
revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,017
|
|
|
|
8,874
|
|
|
|
18,941
|
|
|
|
26,697
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
|
|
3,491
|
|
|
|
5,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,996
|
|
|
|
10,514
|
|
|
|
22,432
|
|
|
|
32,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
8,637
|
|
|
|
25,515
|
|
|
|
31,419
|
|
|
|
47,521
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
3,470
|
|
|
|
7,791
|
|
|
|
14,783
|
|
|
|
25,626
|
|
|
|
32,908
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
9,162
|
|
|
|
8,643
|
|
|
|
11,366
|
|
|
|
16,703
|
|
|
|
18,037
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,557
|
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
3,124
|
|
|
|
4,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
15,189
|
|
|
|
18,444
|
|
|
|
28,649
|
|
|
|
45,453
|
|
|
|
55,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(15,189
|
)
|
|
|
(9,807
|
)
|
|
|
(3,134
|
)
|
|
|
(14,034
|
)
|
|
|
(8,251
|
)
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle
|
|
$
|
(15,032
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,952
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,014
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,807
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,975
|
)
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(15,032
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,952
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,014
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,025
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,975
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion to preferred stock
|
|
|
(2,482
|
)
|
|
|
(3,877
|
)
|
|
|
(4,096
|
)
|
|
|
(5,797
|
)
|
|
|
(5,931
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common
shareholders
|
|
$
|
(17,514
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,829
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,110
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,822
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,906
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share attributable to
common stockholders — basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle
|
|
$
|
(2.74
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.74
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.50
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.10
|
)
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Accretion to preferred stock
|
|
|
(0.45
|
)
|
|
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
|
(0.88
|
)
|
|
|
(0.82
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share attributable to
common stockholders — basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(3.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.41
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.99
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.92
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding
|
|
|
5,492,625
|
|
|
|
5,735,952
|
|
|
|
6,077,538
|
|
|
|
6,635,274
|
|
|
|
7,230,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss per
share — basic and diluted (unaudited)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average common
shares outstanding (unaudited)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,005,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The pro forma consolidated
statement of operations data in the table above gives effect to
the automatic conversion of all of our outstanding convertible
preferred stock into common stock upon the closing of this
offering.
|
29
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
9,903
|
|
|
$
|
15,014
|
|
|
$
|
22,192
|
|
|
$
|
14,663
|
|
|
$
|
5,018
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
9,371
|
|
|
|
19,387
|
|
|
|
28,708
|
|
|
|
20,329
|
|
|
|
25,899
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
12,392
|
|
|
|
26,731
|
|
|
|
39,443
|
|
|
|
45,864
|
|
|
|
69,199
|
|
|
Note payable to bank, including
current portion
|
|
|
1,454
|
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
6,535
|
|
|
Convertible redeemable preferred
stock
|
|
|
37,279
|
|
|
|
61,156
|
|
|
|
80,904
|
|
|
|
91,200
|
|
|
|
97,131
|
|
|
Total stockholders’ deficit
|
|
|
(28,119
|
)
|
|
|
(41,977
|
)
|
|
|
(49,110
|
)
|
|
|
(67,932
|
)
|
|
|
(81,123
|
)
|
30
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial
condition and results of operations should be read together with
our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and
the other financial information appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking statements
that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could
differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking
statements as a result of various factors, including those
discussed below and elsewhere in this prospectus, particularly
under “Risk Factors.”
Overview
We were founded in August 2000 to develop data warehouse
appliances that enable real-time business intelligence. Our NPS
appliance integrates database, server and storage platforms in a
purpose-built unit to enable detailed queries and analyses on
large volumes of stored data. The results of these queries and
analyses provide organizations with actionable information to
improve their business operations.
We are headquartered in Framingham, Massachusetts. Our personnel
and operations are also located throughout the United States, as
well as in Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, Japan and
Korea. We expect to continue to add personnel in the United
States and internationally to provide additional geographic
sales and technical support coverage.
Revenue
We derive our revenue from sales of products and related
services. We sell our data warehouse appliances worldwide to
large global enterprises, mid-market companies and government
agencies through our direct salesforce as well as indirectly via
distribution partners. To date, we have derived the substantial
majority of our revenue from customers located in the United
States. In fiscal 2007, U.S. customers accounted for
approximately 76% of our revenue.
Product Revenue. The significant majority of
our revenue is generated through the sale of our NPS appliances,
primarily to companies in the following vertical industries:
telecommunications,
e-business,
retail, financial services, analytic service providers,
government and healthcare. Since we began shipping our products
in fiscal 2004, our product revenue has grown from
$13.0 million in fiscal 2004 to $30.9 million in
fiscal 2005, $45.5 million in fiscal 2006 and
$64.6 million in fiscal 2007. As we have grown we have
reduced our dependency on our largest customers, with no
customer accounting for more than 10% of our total revenue in
fiscal 2007. Our future revenue growth will depend in
significant part upon further sales of our NPS appliances to our
existing customer base. As of
January 31, 2007, 67% of our
customers have purchased more than one NPS appliance, and the
NPS system is priced to allow customers to
“pay as they
grow” by adding incremental capacity as their needs
increase. In addition, increasing our sales to new customers in
existing vertical industries we currently serve and in other
vertical industries that depend upon high-performance data
analysis is an important element of our strategy. We consider
the further development of our direct and indirect sales
channels in domestic and international markets to be a key to
our future revenue growth and the global acceptance of our
products. Our future revenue growth will also depend on our
ability to sustain the high levels of customer satisfaction
generated by providing
“high-touch”, high-quality
support. We also are dependent on the successful development and
introduction of new products and enhancements to existing
products that achieve acceptance in the market to increase our
revenue.
We maintain a standard price list for all our products. In
addition, we have a corporate policy that governs the level of
discounting our sales organization may offer on our products
based on factors such as transaction size, volume of products,
competition and distribution partner involvement. Our total
product revenue and gross profit are directly affected by our
ability to manage our product pricing policy. In addition,
competition continues to increase and, in the future, we may be
forced to reduce our prices to remain competitive.
Services Revenue. We sell hardware and
software support services to our customers. In addition, we
offer installation services and product training. The percentage
of our total revenue derived from support services was 14% in
fiscal 2005, 15% in fiscal 2006 and 19% in fiscal 2007. We
anticipate that support services will continue to
31
be purchased by new and existing customers and that services
revenue will continue to be between 18% and 20% of our total
revenue.
Cost
of Revenue and Gross Profit
Cost of product revenue consists primarily of amounts paid to
Sanmina, our
contract manufacturer, in connection with the
procurement of hardware components and assembly of those
components into our NPS appliance systems. Neither we nor
Sanmina enter into long-term supply
contracts for our hardware
components, which can cause our cost of product revenue to
fluctuate. These product costs are recorded when the related
product revenue is recognized. Cost of revenue also includes
costs of shipping, warehousing and logistics expenses, warranty
reserves and valuation reserves taken for excess and obsolete
inventory. Shipping, warehousing and logistics costs are
recognized as incurred. Estimated warranty costs are recorded
when the related product revenue is recognized and inventory
valuation reserves are evaluated and recognized periodically.
Cost of services revenue consists primarily of salaries and
employee benefits for our support staff and worldwide
installation and technical account management teams and amounts
paid to Hewlett-Packard to provide
on-site
hardware service.
Our gross profit has been and will continue to be affected by a
variety of factors, including the relative mix of product versus
services revenue; our mix of direct versus indirect sales (as
sales through our indirect channels have lower average selling
prices and gross profit); and changes in the average selling
prices of our products and services, which can be adversely
affected by competitive pressures. Additional factors affecting
gross profit include the timing of new product introductions,
which may reduce demand for our existing product as customers
await the arrival of new products and could also result in
additional reserves against older product inventory, cost
reductions through redesign of existing products and the cost of
our systems hardware. The data warehouse market is highly
competitive and we expect this competition to intensify in the
future, which may increase pricing pressure and reduce product
gross margins.
If our customer base continues to grow, it will be necessary for
us to continue to make significant upfront investments in our
customer service and support infrastructure to support this
growth. The rate at which we add new customers will affect the
level of these upfront investments. The timing of these
additional expenditures could materially affect our cost of
revenue, both in absolute dollars and as a percentage of total
revenue, in any particular period. This could cause downward
pressure on gross margins.
Operating
Expenses
Operating expenses consist of sales and marketing, research and
development, and general and administrative expenses.
Personnel-related costs are the most significant component of
each of these expense categories. We grew from 90 employees at
January 31, 2004 to 225 employees at
January 31, 2007.
We expect to continue to hire significant numbers of new
employees to support our anticipated growth.
Sales and
Marketing Expenses
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and
employee benefits, sales commissions, marketing program expenses
and allocated facilities expenses. We plan to continue to invest
in sales and marketing by increasing the number of our sales
personnel worldwide, expanding our domestic and international
sales and marketing activities, and further building brand
awareness. Accordingly, we expect sales and marketing expenses
to continue to increase in total dollars although we expect
these expenses to decrease as a percentage of total revenue.
Generally, sales personnel are not immediately productive and
thus sales and marketing expenses related to new sales hires are
not immediately accompanied by higher revenue. Hiring additional
sales personnel may reduce short-term operating margins until
the sales personnel become productive and generate revenue.
Accordingly, the timing of hiring sales personnel and the rate
at which they become productive will affect our future
performance.
32
Research
and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries
and employee benefits, product prototype expenses, allocated
facilities expenses and depreciation of equipment used in
research and development activities. In addition to our
U.S. development teams, we use an offshore development team
employed by a
contract engineering firm in Pune, India. Research
and development expenses are recorded as incurred. We devote
substantial resources to the development of additional
functionality for existing products and the development of new
products. We intend to continue to invest significantly in our
research and development efforts because we believe they are
essential to maintaining and increasing our competitive
position. We expect research and development expenses to
increase in total dollars, although we expect such expense to
decrease as a percentage of total revenue.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of
salaries and employee benefits, allocated facilities expenses
and fees for professional services such as legal, accounting and
compliance. We expect general and administrative expenses to
increase in total dollars and to increase slightly as a
percentage of revenue in fiscal 2008 as we invest in
infrastructure to support continued growth and incur additional
expenses related to being a publicly traded company, including
additional accounting and legal fees, costs of compliance with
securities and other regulations, investor relation expenses and
higher insurance premiums, including premiums related to
director and officer insurance.
Stock-based
Compensation
Effective
February 1, 2006, we adopted the Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 123(R),
Share Based Payment, using the prospective transition
method. SFAS No. 123(R) addresses all forms of
shared-based payment awards, including shares issued under
employee stock purchase plans, stock options, restricted stock
and stock appreciation rights. SFAS No. 123(R)
requires us to expense share-based payment awards with
compensation cost for share-based payment transactions measured
at fair value. Under this transition method, stock-based
compensation expense recognized beginning
February 1, 2006
is based on the grant date fair value of stock awards granted or
modified after
February 1, 2006. For fiscal 2007, we
recorded an expense of $0.9 million in connection with
stock-based awards. Unrecognized stock-based compensation
expense of non-vested stock options of $6.2 million, net of
forfeitures, as of
January 31, 2007 is expected to be
recognized using the straight-line method over a weighted
average period of 4.2 years. We expect to recognize
$1.5 million in stock-based compensation in fiscal 2008,
excluding the impact of any grants made after
January 31,
2007.
Other
Interest
Income (Expense), Net
Interest income (expense), net primarily consists of interest
income on cash balances and interest expense on our outstanding
debt.
Other
Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net primarily consists of losses or
gains on translation of
non-U.S. dollar
transactions into U.S. dollars and mark-to-market
adjustments on preferred stock warrants.
Cumulative
Effect of Change in Accounting Principle
On
June 29, 2005, the FASB issued FSP
150-5. FSP
150-5
affirms that freestanding warrants to purchase shares that are
redeemable are subject to the requirements in
SFAS No. 150, regardless of the redemption price or
the timing of the redemption feature. Therefore, under
SFAS No. 150, the outstanding freestanding warrants to
purchase our convertible preferred stock are liabilities that
must be recorded at fair value each quarter, with the changes in
estimated fair value in the quarter recorded as other expense or
income in our consolidated statement of operations.
33
We adopted FSP
150-5 as of
August 1, 2005 and recorded an expense of $0.2 million
for the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle
to reflect the estimated fair value of these warrants as of that
date. There was no change in fair value between the adoption
date and
January 31, 2006. In the year ended
January 31, 2007, we recorded $0.2 million of
additional expense to reflect the increase in fair value between
February 1, 2006 and
January 31, 2007. The pro forma
effect of the adoption of FSP
150-5 on our
results of operations for 2004 and 2005, if applied
retroactively as if SFAS No. 150 had been adopted in
those years, was not material. We estimated the fair value of
these warrants at the respective balance sheet dates using the
Black-Scholes option valuation model. This model utilizes as
inputs the estimated fair value of the underlying convertible
preferred stock at the valuation measurement date, the remaining
contractual term of the warrant, risk-free interest rates,
expected dividends and expected volatility of the price of the
underlying convertible preferred stock.
Application
of Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance
with GAAP. These accounting principles require us to make
certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that can affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the dates of
the consolidated financial statements, the disclosure of
contingencies as of the dates of the consolidated financial
statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses
during the periods presented. We evaluate these estimates,
judgments and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Although we
believe that our estimates, judgments and assumptions are
reasonable under the circumstances, actual results may differ
from those estimates.
We believe that of our significant accounting policies, which
are described in the notes to the financial statements appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus, the following accounting policies
involve the most judgment and complexity:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
revenue recognition;
|
| |
| |
•
|
stock-based compensation;
|
| |
| |
•
|
inventory valuation;
|
| |
| |
•
|
warranty reserves; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
accounting for income taxes.
|
Accordingly, we believe the policies set forth above are the
most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our
financial condition and results of operations. If actual results
or events differ materially from the estimates, judgments and
assumptions used by us in applying these policies, our reported
financial condition and results of operations could be
materially affected.
Revenue
Recognition
We derive our revenue from sales of products and related
services and enter into multiple-element arrangements in the
normal course of business with our customers and distribution
partners. In all of our arrangements, we do not recognize any
revenue until we can determine that persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or
determinable, and we deem collection to be probable. In making
these judgments, we evaluate these criteria as follows:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Evidence of an arrangement. We consider a
non-cancelable agreement signed by the customer and us to be
persuasive evidence of an arrangement.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Delivery has occurred. We consider delivery to
have occurred when product has been delivered to the customer
and no post-delivery obligations exist other than ongoing
support obligations. In instances where customer acceptance is
required, delivery is deemed to have occurred when customer
acceptance has been achieved.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Fees are fixed or determinable. We consider
the fee to be fixed or determinable unless the fee is subject to
refund or adjustment or is not payable within normal payment
terms. If the fee is subject to refund or adjustment, we
recognize revenue when the right to a refund or adjustment
lapses. If offered payment terms
|
34
|
|
|
| |
|
exceed our normal terms, we recognize revenue as the amounts
become due and payable or upon the receipt of cash.
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Collection is deemed probable. We conduct a
credit review for all transactions at the inception of an
arrangement to determine the creditworthiness of the customer.
Collection is deemed probable if, based upon our evaluation, we
expect that the customer will be able to pay amounts under the
arrangement as payments become due. If we determine that
collection is not probable, revenue is deferred and recognized
upon the receipt of cash.
|
We enter into multiple element arrangements in the normal course
of business with our customers. We recognize elements in such
arrangements when delivered and the amount allocated to each
element is based on vendor specific objective evidence of fair
value (
“VSOE”). We determine VSOE based upon the
amount charged when we sell an element separately. When VSOE
exists for undelivered elements but not for the delivered
elements, we use the
“residual method.” Under the
residual method, we initially defer the fair value of the
undelivered elements. The residual
contract amount is then
allocated to and recognized for the delivered elements.
Thereafter, we recognize the amount deferred for the undelivered
elements when those elements are delivered. For arrangements in
which VSOE does not exist for each undelivered element, we defer
revenue for the entire arrangement and recognize it only when
delivery of all the elements without VSOE has occurred, unless
the only undelivered element is maintenance in which case we
recognize revenue from the entire
contract ratably over the
maintenance period.
The determination of VSOE is highly judgmental and is a key
factor in determining whether revenue may be recognized or must
be deferred and the extent to which it may be recognized once
the various elements of an arrangement are delivered. We assess
VSOE based on previous sales of products and services, the type
and size of customer and renewal rates in
contracts. We monitor
VSOE on an ongoing basis. A change in our assessment of, or our
inability to establish VSOE for products or services may result
in significant variation in our revenues and operating results.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Through
January 31, 2006, we accounted for our stock-based
employee compensation arrangements in accordance with the
intrinsic value provisions of Accounting Principles Board, or
APB, Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees and related interpretations. Under the intrinsic
value method, compensation expense is measured on the date of
the grants as the difference between the fair value of our
common stock and the exercise or purchase price multiplied by
the number of stock options or restricted stock awards granted.
Through
January 31, 2006, we accounted for stock-based
compensation expense for non-employees using the fair value
method prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards, or SFAS, No. 123 and the Black-Scholes option
pricing model, and recorded the fair value of non-employee stock
options as an expense over the vesting term of the option.
In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), which
requires companies to expense the fair value of employee stock
options and other forms of stock-based compensation. We adopted
SFAS No. 123(R) effective
February 1, 2006.
SFAS No. 123(R) requires nonpublic companies that used
the minimum value method under SFAS No. 123 for either
recognition or pro forma disclosures to apply
SFAS No. 123(R) using the prospective-transition
method. As such, we will continue to apply APB Opinion
No. 25 in future periods to equity awards outstanding at
the date of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) that were
measured using the minimum value method. In accordance with
SFAS No. 123(R), we will recognize the compensation
cost of employee stock-based awards granted subsequent to
February 1, 2006 in the statement of operations using the
straight-line method over the vesting period of the award.
Effective with the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we
have elected to use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to
determine the fair value of stock options granted.
As there has been no public market for our common stock prior to
this offering, and therefore a lack of company-specific
historical and implied volatility data, we have determined the
share price volatility for options granted in fiscal 2007 based
on an analysis of reported data for a peer group of companies
that granted options with substantially similar terms. The
expected volatility of options granted has been determined using
an average of the
35
historical volatility measures of this peer group of companies
for a period equal to the expected life of the option. The
expected volatility for options granted during fiscal 2007 was
75%-83%. We intend to continue to consistently apply this
process using the same or similar entities until a sufficient
amount of historical information regarding the volatility of our
own share price becomes available, or unless circumstances
change such that the identified entities are no longer similar
to us. In this latter case, more suitable, similar entities
whose share prices are publicly available would be utilized in
the calculation.
The expected life of options granted has been determined
utilizing the “simplified” method as prescribed by the
SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin, or SAB, No. 107,
Share-Based Payment. The expected life of options granted
during fiscal 2007 was 6.5 years. For fiscal 2007, the
weighted average risk-free interest rate used ranged from 4.56%
to 5.03%. The risk-free interest rate is based on a daily
treasury yield curve rate whose term is consistent with the
expected life of the stock options. We have not paid and do not
anticipate paying cash dividends on our shares of common stock;
therefore, the expected dividend yield is assumed to be zero.
In addition, SFAS No. 123(R) requires forfeitures to
be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in
subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those
estimates, whereas SFAS No. 123 permitted companies to
record forfeitures based on actual forfeitures, which was our
historical policy under SFAS No. 123. As a result, we
applied an estimated forfeiture rate, based on our historical
forfeiture experience, of 2.0% in fiscal 2007 in determining the
expense recorded in our consolidated statement of operations.
We have historically granted stock options at exercise prices no
less than the fair market value as determined by our board of
directors, with input from management. Our board exercised
judgment in determining the estimated fair value of our common
stock on the date of grant based on a number of objective and
subjective factors. Factors considered by our board of directors
included:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
independent valuation reports that we received;
|
| |
| |
•
|
The independent valuation methodology derives a range of equity
values based upon a combination of three different approaches:
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Implied valuation based on comparable companies — uses
direct comparisons to comparable public companies and their
valuations, trading and operating statistics to estimate
comparable valuation ranges. Discounts are applied based upon
the lack of marketability and minority interest nature of our
common stock to estimate its fair value.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Implied valuation based on precedent transactions —
compares recently acquired companies and their enterprise values
relative to their revenue profile to develop a comparative
valuation based upon revenue multiple profiles similar to our
revenue multiple profiles.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Implied valuation based upon projected discounted cash flows.
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
the
agreed-upon
consideration paid in arms-length transactions in the form of
convertible preferred stock;
|
| |
| |
•
|
the superior rights and preferences of our preferred stock as
compared to our common stock;
|
| |
| |
•
|
historical and anticipated fluctuations in our revenue and
results of operations; and
|
| |
| |
•
|
the risk of owning our common stock and its lack of liquidity.
|
Since the beginning of fiscal 2006, we granted stock options
with exercise prices as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
Stock Option Grant Dates
|
|
Options Granted
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
699,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,333,250
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
427,500
|
|
|
$
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,875,250
|
|
|
$
|
6.70
|
|
36
Inventory
Valuation
Inventories primarily consist of finished systems and are stated
at the lower of cost or market value. A large portion of our
inventory also relates to evaluation units located at customer
locations, as some of our customers test our equipment prior to
purchasing. The number of evaluation units has increased due to
our overall growth and an increase in our customer base. We
assess the valuation of all inventories, including raw
materials,
work-in-process
and finished goods, on a periodic basis. We write down obsolete
inventory or inventory in excess of our estimated usage to its
estimated market value if less than its cost. Inherent in our
estimates of market value in determining inventory valuation are
estimates related to economic trends, future demand for our
products and technological obsolescence of our products. If
actual market conditions are less favorable than our
projections, additional inventory write-downs may be required.
Inventory valuation reserves were $0 and $0.7 million as of
January 31, 2006 and
2007, respectively.
Warranty
Reserves
Our standard product warranty provides that our product will be
free from defects in material and workmanship and will, under
normal use, conform to the published specifications for the
product for a period of 90 days. Under this warranty, we
will repair the product, provide replacement parts at no charge
to the customer or refund amounts to the customer for defective
products. We record estimated warranty costs, based upon
historical experience, at the time we recognize revenue. As the
complexity of our product increases, we could experience higher
warranty costs relative to sales than we have previously
experienced, and we may need to increase these estimated
warranty reserves. Warranty reserves were $0.7 million and
$1.1 million as of
January 31, 2006 and
2007,
respectively.
Accounting
for Income Taxes
At
January 31, 2007, we had net operating loss
carryforwards available to offset future taxable income for
federal and state purposes of $29.2 million and
$25.7 million, respectively. These net operating loss
carryforwards expire at various dates through fiscal year 2027
and 2011 for federal and state purposes, respectively. At
January 31, 2007 we had available net operating losses for
foreign purposes of $7.8 million, of which
$7.5 million may be carried forward indefinitely and
$0.3 million expire beginning in fiscal 2011. We also had
available at
January 31, 2007 research and development
credit carryforwards to offset future federal and state taxes of
approximately $3.0 million and $2.3 million
respectively which may be used to offset future taxable income
and expire at various dates beginning in 2016 through fiscal
years 2027 As part of the process of preparing our consolidated
financial statements, we are required to estimate our income
taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. We
record this amount as a provision or benefit for taxes in
accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. This process involves estimating our actual current tax
exposure, including assessing the risks associated with tax
audits, and assessing temporary differences resulting from
different treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes.
These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities.
As of
January 31, 2007, we had gross deferred tax assets of
$25.8 million, which were primarily related to federal and
state net operating loss carryforwards, research and development
credit carryforwards and research and development expenses
capitalized for tax purposes. We assess the likelihood that our
deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income
and, to the extent that we believe recovery is not likely, we
establish a valuation allowance. Due to the uncertainty of our
future profitability, we have recorded a valuation allowance
equal to the $25.8 million of gross deferred tax assets as
of
January 31, 2007. Accordingly, we have not recorded a
provision for income taxes in our statement of operations for
any of the periods presented. If we determine in the future that
these deferred tax assets are more-likely-than-not to be
realized, a release of all or a portion of the related valuation
allowance would increase income in the period in which that
determination is made.
37
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth our consolidated results of
operations for the periods shown:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
30,908
|
|
|
$
|
45,508
|
|
|
$
|
64,632
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
5,121
|
|
|
|
8,343
|
|
|
|
14,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
36,029
|
|
|
|
53,851
|
|
|
|
79,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
8,874
|
|
|
|
18,941
|
|
|
|
26,697
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
|
|
3,491
|
|
|
|
5,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
|
10,514
|
|
|
|
22,432
|
|
|
|
32,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
25,515
|
|
|
|
31,419
|
|
|
|
47,521
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
14,783
|
|
|
|
25,626
|
|
|
|
32,908
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
11,366
|
|
|
|
16,703
|
|
|
|
18,037
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
3,124
|
|
|
|
4,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
28,649
|
|
|
|
45,453
|
|
|
|
55,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(3,134
|
)
|
|
|
(14,034
|
)
|
|
|
(8,251
|
)
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(3,014
|
)
|
|
|
(13,807
|
)
|
|
|
(7,975
|
)
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(3,014
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,025
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,975
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth our consolidated results of
operations as a percentage of revenue for the periods shown:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
85.8
|
%
|
|
|
84.5
|
%
|
|
|
81.2
|
%
|
|
Services
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
|
|
33.5
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
|
29.2
|
|
|
|
41.7
|
|
|
|
40.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
70.8
|
|
|
|
58.3
|
|
|
|
59.7
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
41.0
|
|
|
|
47.6
|
|
|
|
41.3
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
79.5
|
|
|
|
84.4
|
|
|
|
70.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
|
(26.1
|
)
|
|
|
(10.4
|
)
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
|
(25.6
|
)
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(8.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(26.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Revenue
Total revenue increased $25.7 million, or 48%, to
$79.6 million in fiscal 2007 from $53.9 million in
fiscal 2006. Total revenue related to new customer sales
represented 61% of total revenue in fiscal 2007 as compared to
74% in fiscal 2006, while repeat business from the installed
customer base represented 39% of total revenue in fiscal 2007 as
compared to 26% in fiscal 2006.
Product revenue increased $19.1 million, or 42%, to
$64.6 million in fiscal 2007 from $45.5 million in
fiscal 2006. This increase was due primarily to sales to new
customers, as the number of customers increased from 46 to 87,
or 89%, during the year.
Services revenue increased $6.7 million, or 81%, to
$15.0 million in fiscal 2007 from $8.3 million in
fiscal 2006. This increase was a result of increased product
sales and accompanying sales of new maintenance and support
contracts combined with the renewal of maintenance and support
contracts by existing customers.
Gross
Margin
Total gross margin increased to 60% in fiscal 2007 from 58% in
fiscal 2006. Product gross margin increased to 59% in fiscal
2007 from 58% in fiscal 2006. This increase was due primarily to
a reduction in the cost of our hardware components throughout
fiscal 2007 and as a result of higher transition costs,
consisting primarily of the costs to upgrade inventory to then
current selling specifications, incurred in fiscal 2006 in
conjunction with the release of a new product line. These cost
improvements were partially offset by price erosion primarily
due to increased competition. Stock-based compensation expense
included in cost of product revenue increased to approximately
$12,000 in fiscal 2007 from $0 in fiscal 2006 in connection with
our adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) in fiscal 2007.
Services gross margin increased to 64% in fiscal 2007 from 58%
in fiscal 2006. This increase was a result of our services
revenue growth of 81% while services headcount only grew 22%
between fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007. Stock-based compensation
expense included in cost of services revenue increased to
approximately $19,000 in fiscal 2007 from $0 in fiscal 2006.
Sales and
Marketing Expenses
Sales and marketing expenses increased $7.3 million, or
28%, to $32.9 million in fiscal 2007 from
$25.6 million in fiscal 2006. As a percentage of revenue,
sales and marketing expenses decreased to 41% in fiscal 2007
from 48% in fiscal 2006. The number of sales and marketing
employees increased to 85 at
January 31, 2007 from 67 at
January 31, 2006. Sales commissions, salaries and employee
benefits, sales and marketing promotions and programs, partner
referral fees and sales and marketing travel accounted for
$3.3 million, $1.4 million, $0.7 million,
$0.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively, of the
$7.3 million increase. The remainder of the increase was
attributable primarily to additional sales office rent and
office costs to support the geographic expansion of the
salesforce. Stock-based compensation expense included in sales
and marketing expenses increased to $0.2 million in fiscal
2007 from $0 in fiscal 2006.
Research
and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses increased $1.3 million,
or 8%, to $18.0 million in fiscal 2007 from
$16.7 million in fiscal 2006. As a percentage of revenue,
research and development expenses decreased to 23% in fiscal
2007 from 31% in fiscal 2006. The number of research and
development employees increased to 85 at
January 31, 2007
from 70 at
January 31, 2006. The offshore development team
from our
contract engineering firm increased to 53 people
at
January 31, 2007 from 43 people at
January 31,
2006. Salaries and benefit and offshore and other consulting
costs each increased by $1.0 million from fiscal 2006. This
increase was also attributable to higher allocated facilities
and depreciation expenses and travel expenses totaling
$0.5 million. These increases were partially offset by a
$1.3 million decrease in new product prototype expenses.
39
Stock-based compensation expense included in research and
development expenses decreased to $0.2 million in fiscal
2007 from $0.8 million in fiscal 2006. The fiscal 2006
stock-based compensation expense related to a purchase by
certain principal investors in Netezza of 500,000 shares of
our common stock from a former executive of Netezza. We
determined that the transaction resulted in consideration paid
to the former executive in excess of the fair value of the
common stock purchased. Due to the close relationship between
the investors and
the company, the excess consideration was
considered compensation on behalf of
the company and recorded as
an expense.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased $1.7 million,
or 55%, to $4.8 million in fiscal 2007 from
$3.1 million in fiscal 2006. As a percentage of revenue,
general and administrative expenses were 6% in both fiscal 2007
and fiscal 2006. The number of general and administrative
employees increased to 19 at
January 31, 2007 from 14 at
January 31, 2006. Salaries and professional services fees
accounted for $0.7 million and $0.3 million,
respectively, of the $1.7 million increase. The remainder
of the increase was attributable to stock-based compensation
expense and various other expenses including allocated
facilities expenses. The additional personnel and professional
services fees were primarily the result of our ongoing efforts
to build legal, financial, human resources and information
technology functions required of a public company. Stock-based
compensation expense included in general and administrative
expenses increased to $0.5 million in fiscal 2007 from
approximately $24,000 in fiscal 2006.
Interest
Income (Expense), Net
We incurred $0.4 million of interest expense, net in fiscal
2007 as compared to $0.3 million of interest income, net in
fiscal 2006. This increase was due to an increase in our average
debt balance during fiscal 2007. The increase in the average
debt balance was attributable to $3.6 million in net debt
drawdowns during fiscal 2007.
Other
Income (Expense), Net
We incurred other income, net of $0.6 million in fiscal
2007 as compared to $0.1 million of other expense, net in
fiscal 2006. This increase was due to higher transaction gains
for activities in our foreign
subsidiaries, primarily the United
Kingdom, and $0.2 million from the mark-to-market
adjustments on preferred stock warrants.
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Revenue
Total revenue increased $17.8 million, or 49%, to
$53.9 million in fiscal 2006 from $36.0 million in
fiscal 2005. Total revenue related to new customer sales
represented 74% of total revenue in fiscal 2006 as compared to
19% in fiscal 2005, while repeat business from the installed
customer base represented 26% of total revenue in fiscal 2006 as
compared to 81% in fiscal 2005. One repeat customer accounted
for 49% of total revenue in fiscal 2005.
Product revenue increased $14.6 million, or 47%, to
$45.5 million in fiscal 2006 from $30.9 million in
fiscal 2005. This increase was due primarily to sales to new
customers, as the number of customers increased from 15 to 46,
or 207%, during the year.
Services revenue increased $3.2 million, or 63%, to
$8.3 million in fiscal 2006 from $5.1 million in
fiscal 2005. This increase was a result of increased product
sales and accompanying sales of new maintenance and support
contracts combined with the renewal of maintenance and support
contracts by existing customers.
Gross
Margin
Total gross margin decreased to 58% in fiscal 2006 from 71% in
fiscal 2005. Product gross margin also decreased to 58% in
fiscal 2006 from 71% in fiscal 2005. This decrease was primarily
due to our increased penetration into more vertical industries
and increased pricing pressure from competition in those
vertical industries. In addition, the release of a new product
line in fiscal 2006 resulted in higher product costs initially
for these new products.
Services gross margin decreased to 58% in fiscal 2006 from 68%
in fiscal 2005. During fiscal 2006, we developed a more
high-touch strategy for our support services and, accordingly,
invested in the staffing of a
40
technical account management team. This account management team
provides
on-site
customer support services to supplement our Framingham-based
help desk services. The initial investment in this group
resulted in additional costs incurred in advance of anticipated
additional services revenue.
Sales and
Marketing Expenses
Sales and marketing expenses increased $10.8 million, or
73%, to $25.6 million in fiscal 2006 from
$14.8 million in fiscal 2005. As a percentage of revenue,
sales and marketing expenses increased to 48% in fiscal 2006
from 41% in fiscal 2005. The number of sales and marketing
employees increased to 67 at
January 31, 2006 from 46 at
January 31, 2005. Salaries and employee benefits, sales and
marketing travel, sales commissions, and sales and marketing
promotions and programs accounted for $4.4 million,
$2.4 million, $1.3 million and $0.9 million,
respectively, of the $10.8 million increase. The remainder
of the increase was attributable primarily to additional sales
office rents and office costs to support the geographic
expansion of the salesforce.
Research
and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses increased $5.3 million,
or 47%, to $16.7 million in fiscal 2006 from
$11.4 million in fiscal 2005. As a percentage of revenue,
research and development expenses were 31% and 32% in fiscal
2006 and 2005, respectively. The number of research and
development employees increased to 70 at
January 31, 2006
from 65 at
January 31, 2005. The offshore development team
from our
contract engineering firm increased to 43 people
at
January 31, 2006 from 24 people at
January 31,
2005. Salaries and benefits and offshore consulting costs
accounted for $2.6 million and $0.7 million,
respectively, of the $5.3 million increase. New product
prototype expenses and test equipment depreciation accounted for
$1.5 million of the increase. The remainder of the increase
was attributable primarily to allocated facilities and other
depreciation expenses.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased $0.6 million,
or 24%, to $3.1 million in fiscal 2006 from
$2.5 million in fiscal 2005. As a percentage of revenue,
general and administrative expenses decreased to 6% in fiscal
2006 from 7% in fiscal 2005. This decrease is attributable to
50% revenue growth from fiscal 2006 to fiscal 2007 while the
number of general and administrative employees totaled 14 at
both
January 31, 2006 and
January 31, 2005. Salaries
and professional services fees, office costs and Massachusetts
use tax expenses accounted for $0.2 million,
$0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of the
$0.6 million increase. The remainder of the increase was
attributable to various expenses including allocated facilities
expenses.
Interest
Income (Expense), Net
Interest income, net increased to $0.3 million in fiscal
2006 from $0.1 million in fiscal 2005. This increase was
due to a higher average cash balance during fiscal 2006.
Other
Income (Expense), Net
We incurred other expense, net of $0.1 million in fiscal
2006 as compared to approximately $35,000 of other income, net,
in fiscal 2005. This increase in expense resulted from an
increase in transaction losses for activities in our foreign
subsidiaries, primarily the United Kingdom.
41
Quarterly
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our unaudited quarterly
consolidated statements of operations data for each of the eight
quarters of fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007. The quarterly data have
been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, and
reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of this
information. You should read this information together with our
consolidated financial statements and the related notes
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. Our operating results
may fluctuate due to a variety of factors. As a result,
comparing our operating results on a
quarter-to-quarter
basis may not be meaningful. Our results for these quarterly
periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be
expected for a full year or any future period.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
April 30,
|
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
April 30,
|
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of
Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
8,077
|
|
|
$
|
10,017
|
|
|
$
|
12,466
|
|
|
$
|
14,948
|
|
|
$
|
8,889
|
|
|
$
|
14,389
|
|
|
$
|
19,359
|
|
|
$
|
21,995
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
2,736
|
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
|
|
3,395
|
|
|
|
3,812
|
|
|
|
4,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
9,708
|
|
|
|
12,169
|
|
|
|
14,290
|
|
|
|
17,684
|
|
|
|
11,998
|
|
|
|
17,784
|
|
|
|
23,171
|
|
|
|
26,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
2,984
|
|
|
|
4,974
|
|
|
|
5,255
|
|
|
|
5,727
|
|
|
|
3,565
|
|
|
|
6,046
|
|
|
|
8,127
|
|
|
|
8,959
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
891
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
|
3,635
|
|
|
|
5,978
|
|
|
|
6,146
|
|
|
|
6,673
|
|
|
|
4,890
|
|
|
|
7,155
|
|
|
|
9,575
|
|
|
|
10,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
6,073
|
|
|
|
6,191
|
|
|
|
8,144
|
|
|
|
11,011
|
|
|
|
7,108
|
|
|
|
10,629
|
|
|
|
13,596
|
|
|
|
16,188
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
5,653
|
|
|
|
6,724
|
|
|
|
6,362
|
|
|
|
6,887
|
|
|
|
6,373
|
|
|
|
7,217
|
|
|
|
9,281
|
|
|
|
10,039
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
4,429
|
|
|
|
3,578
|
|
|
|
3,721
|
|
|
|
4,976
|
|
|
|
4,226
|
|
|
|
4,321
|
|
|
|
4,667
|
|
|
|
4,823
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
|
|
1,135
|
|
|
|
1,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
11,155
|
|
|
|
11,065
|
|
|
|
10,837
|
|
|
|
12,396
|
|
|
|
11,451
|
|
|
|
12,785
|
|
|
|
15,083
|
|
|
|
16,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(5,082
|
)
|
|
|
(4,874
|
)
|
|
|
(2,693
|
)
|
|
|
(1,385
|
)
|
|
|
(4,343
|
)
|
|
|
(2,156
|
)
|
|
|
(1,487
|
)
|
|
|
(265
|
)
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(4,959
|
)
|
|
|
(4,928
|
)
|
|
|
(2,582
|
)
|
|
|
(1,338
|
)
|
|
|
(4,130
|
)
|
|
|
(1,893
|
)
|
|
|
(1,494
|
)
|
|
|
(457
|
)
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(4,959
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,928
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,800
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,338
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,130
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,893
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,494
|
)
|
|
$
|
(457
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
The following table sets forth our consolidated results of
operations as a percentage of revenue for the periods shown:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
April 30,
|
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
April 30,
|
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of
Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
83.2
|
%
|
|
|
82.3
|
%
|
|
|
87.2
|
%
|
|
|
84.5
|
%
|
|
|
74.1
|
%
|
|
|
80.9
|
%
|
|
|
83.5
|
%
|
|
|
82.5
|
%
|
|
Services
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
17.7
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
25.9
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
|
|
40.9
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
32.4
|
|
|
|
29.7
|
|
|
|
34.0
|
|
|
|
35.1
|
|
|
|
33.6
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
|
37.4
|
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
43.0
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
40.8
|
|
|
|
40.2
|
|
|
|
41.3
|
|
|
|
39.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
62.6
|
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
|
|
|
62.3
|
|
|
|
59.2
|
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
|
|
58.7
|
|
|
|
60.7
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
58.2
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
44.5
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
|
|
53.1
|
|
|
|
40.6
|
|
|
|
40.1
|
|
|
|
37.6
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
|
|
29.4
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
114.9
|
|
|
|
90.9
|
|
|
|
75.8
|
|
|
|
70.1
|
|
|
|
95.4
|
|
|
|
71.9
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
|
|
61.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(52.3
|
)
|
|
|
(40.1
|
)
|
|
|
(18.8
|
)
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
(36.2
|
)
|
|
|
(12.1
|
)
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(51.1
|
)
|
|
|
(40.5
|
)
|
|
|
(18.1
|
)
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
(34.4
|
)
|
|
|
(10.6
|
)
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(51.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(40.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(19.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(34.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(10.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seasonality
Revenue has increased sequentially in most of the quarters
presented due to increases in the number of products sold to new
and existing customers. Our product revenue has tended to be
seasonal. In our fourth quarter, we have historically benefited
from our customers’ year-end purchasing activity in
November and December in addition to customers’ new budget
year purchasing activity in January. As a result, historically
we have experienced seasonally reduced product revenue, cost of
product revenue and gross profit in the first quarter of each
fiscal year, as is the case with many technology companies.
Operating expenses have increased sequentially in most of the
quarters presented as we continued to add personnel and related
costs to accommodate our growing business on a quarterly basis.
Timing of
sales
On a quarterly basis, we have usually generated the majority of
our product revenue in the final month of each quarter. This is
primarily due to the fact that our sales personnel who have a
strong incentive to meet quarterly sales targets tend to
increase their sales activity as the end of a quarter nears. As
a result, small delays in completion of sales transactions could
have a significant impact on our operating results for any
particular quarter.
43
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At
January 31, 2007, we had cash and cash equivalents of
$5.0 million and accounts receivable of $31.8 million.
Since our inception, we have funded our operations using a
combination of issuances of convertible preferred stock, which
has provided us with aggregate net proceeds of
$73.3 million, cash collections from customers and a term
loan credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank. As of
January 31, 2007, we had a total of $6.5 million
outstanding under this credit facility.
Our principal uses of cash historically have consisted of
payroll and other operating expenses, repayments of borrowings,
purchases of property and equipment primarily to support the
development of new products and purchases of inventory to
support our sales and our increasing volume of evaluation units
located at customer locations that enable our customers and
prospective customers to test our equipment prior to purchasing.
The number of evaluation units has consistently increased due to
our overall growth and an increase in our pipeline of potential
customers.
The following table shows our cash flows from operating
activities, investing activities and financing activities for
the stated periods:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
$
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,760
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,163
|
)
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(4,311
|
)
|
|
|
(5,506
|
)
|
|
|
(1,477
|
)
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
14,107
|
|
|
|
7,644
|
|
|
|
3,789
|
|
Cash
Used In Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities is affected by our
investments in sales and marketing, research and development,
and corporate administration to support the growth of our
business. We also use cash to support growth and changes in
inventory, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other
current assets and liabilities. Accounts receivable balances at
quarter and year-ends have historically been affected by the
timing of orders from our customers during the year.
Net cash used in operating activities was $2.6 million,
$9.8 million and $11.2 million in fiscal 2005, 2006
and 2007, respectively. Net cash used in operating activities in
fiscal 2007 primarily consisted of a net loss of
$8.0 million, an increase in accounts receivable of
$17.9 million due to the timing of year-end orders, and a
use of $15.5 million to fund our net increase in inventory
primarily used to provide additional evaluation units provided
to our increasing customer base and prospective customers. These
were partially offset by an increase in deferred revenue of
$14.8 million due to the increase in our customer base and
related increase in purchases of annual maintenance and support
agreements, depreciation expense of $2.6 million,
stock-based compensation expense of $0.9 million and net
changes in our other operating assets and liabilities of
$11.6 million. Net cash used in operating activities in
fiscal 2006 consisted of a net loss of $14.0 million, a net
increase in accounts receivable of $8.4 million and a net
increase in inventory of $2.8 million. These were partially
offset by an increase in deferred revenue of $6.3 million,
depreciation expense of $2.8 million and net changes in our
other operating assets and liabilities of $5.2 million. Net
cash used in operating activities in fiscal 2005 consisted of a
net loss of $3.0 million and a net increase in inventory of
$5.1 million, reduced by depreciation expense of
$1.8 million and net changes in our other operating assets
and liabilities of $3.7 million.
Cash
Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities primarily relates to
capital expenditures to support our growth, including computer
equipment, internal use software, furniture and fixtures and
engineering and test equipment.
Net cash used in investing activities was $4.3 million,
$5.5 million and $1.5 million in fiscal 2005, 2006 and
2007, respectively. Net cash used in investing activities in
fiscal 2007 primarily consisted of $1.1 million of
44
computer equipment and software and $0.4 million of
engineering and test equipment. Net cash used in investing
activities in fiscal 2005 and 2006 consisted primarily of
$3.2 million and $4.3 million, respectively, related
to purchases of engineering and test equipment. Our capital
expenditure budget for fiscal 2008 totals approximately
$2 million, primarily for additional network and
infrastructure systems and for computer equipment and software
for additional personnel we anticipate hiring.
Cash
Provided by Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was
$14.1 million, $7.6 million and $3.8 million in
fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. Net cash provided by
financing activities in fiscal 2007 primarily consisted of
$3.6 million of net borrowings under our term loan credit
facility. These borrowings were used to fund losses from
operations and our net increase in accounts receivable and
inventory. Net cash provided by financing activities in fiscal
2006 consisted primarily of $4.5 million in net proceeds
from the sale of our Series D preferred stock and
$3.0 million of net borrowings under our term loan credit
facility. Net cash provided by financing activities in fiscal
2005 consisted primarily of $15.5 million in net proceeds
from the sale of our Series D preferred stock, partially
offset by a $1.5 million repayment of principal and
interest on an equipment line of credit.
Working
Capital Facilities
As of
January 31, 2007 we had $6.5 million outstanding
under a term loan credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank, as
agent for certain other lenders, including Gold Hill Venture
Lending. We were required to initially make interest-only
payments on any amounts borrowed through June 2006, after which
we were required to make 36 equal consecutive monthly
installments of principal and interest through June 2009. All
unpaid principal and accrued interest under this loan is due and
payable in full on
June 1, 2009. Under the terms of this
loan, interest rates are fixed for the term of the loan at the
time of each advance at the prime rate plus 4% and were 10%,
10.75%, 11.75% and 12%, for each advance, respectively, as of
January 31, 2007. As of
January 31, 2007, there was no
additional borrowing availability under this agreement.
On
January 31, 2007, we obtained a revolving line of credit
with Silicon Valley Bank under which we can borrow up to
$15.0 million. Our interest rate under this revolving line
of credit is 1% below the prime rate, and at
January 31,
2007 was 7.25%. Borrowings are secured by substantially all of
our assets other than our intellectual property. All outstanding
debt will become payable on
January 30, 2008. As of
January 31, 2007, we had no amounts outstanding under this
new revolving line of credit and $15.0 million available to
borrow.
Contractual
Obligations
The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of
January 31, 2007:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due In
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less Than 1 Year
|
|
|
1 - 3 Years
|
|
|
3 - 5 Years
|
|
|
More Than 5 Years
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including current
portion(1)
|
|
$
|
6,639
|
|
|
$
|
2,540
|
|
|
$
|
4,099
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Purchase obligations(2)
|
|
|
16,310
|
|
|
|
16,310
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes interest payments, which cannot be calculated at this
time due to the fluctuating interest rate. |
| |
|
(2) |
|
Purchase obligations primarily represent the value of purchase
orders issued to our contract manufacturer, Sanmina, for the
procurement of assembled NPS appliance systems for the next
three months. |
We believe that our cash and cash equivalents of
$5.0 million and accounts receivable of $31.8 million
at
January 31, 2007, together with the anticipated net
proceeds to us of this offering and any cash flows from our
operations will be sufficient to fund our projected operating
requirements for at least the next 12 months. However, we
may need to raise additional funds subsequent to that time, or
sooner if we are presented with unforeseen
45
circumstances or opportunities. See “Risk
Factors — It is difficult to predict our future
capital needs and we may be unable to obtain additional
financing that we may need, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, operating results and financial
condition.”
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We did not have during the periods presented, and we do not
currently have, any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined
under SEC rules, such as relationships with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships, which are often referred to
as structured finance or special purpose entities, established
for the purpose of facilitating financing transactions that do
not have to be reflected on our balance sheet.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Foreign
Currency Risk
Our international sales and marketing operations incur expenses
that are denominated in foreign currencies. These expenses could
be materially affected by currency fluctuations. Our exposures
are to fluctuations in exchange rates for the U.S. dollar
versus the British pound and the Japanese yen. Changes in
currency exchange rates could adversely affect our consolidated
results of operations or financial position. Additionally, our
international sales and marketing operations maintain cash
balances denominated in foreign currencies. In order to decrease
the inherent risk associated with translation of foreign cash
balances into our reporting currency, we have not maintained
excess cash balances in foreign currencies. As of
January 31, 2007, we had $0.8 million of cash in
foreign accounts. To date, we have not hedged our exposure to
changes in foreign currency exchange rates and, as a result, we
could incur unanticipated translation gains and losses.
Interest
Rate Risk
We had a cash and cash equivalents balance of $5.0 million
at
January 31, 2007, which was held for working capital
purposes. We do not enter into investments for trading or
speculative purposes. We do not believe that we have any
material exposure to changes in the fair value of these
investments as a result of changes in interest rates. Declines
in interest rates, however, will reduce future investment
income, and increases in interest rates may increase future
interest expense.
At
January 31, 2007, we had $6.5 million of borrowings
outstanding under our term loan credit facility, which bears
interest at a variable rate adjusted monthly based on the prime
rate plus applicable margins.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
On
February 15, 2007, the FASB issued Statement
No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115,
(
“SFAS No. 159”), which permits companies to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other
items at fair value. The objective of SFAS No. 159 is
to improve financial reporting by providing companies with the
opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused
by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without
having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions.
SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after
November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the
effect that SFAS No. 159 may have on our financial
statements taken as a whole.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally
accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. This statement does not require any new
fair value measurements; rather, it applies under other
accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are
effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15,
2007. We are currently assessing SFAS No. 157 and have
not yet determined the impact, if any, that its adoption will
have on our result of operations or financial condition.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No.
(“FIN”) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes — An Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109, which prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition
and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken
in a
46
tax return. FIN 48 will be effective for fiscal years
beginning after
December 15, 2006. We do not expect the
adoption to have a material impact on our results of operations
or financial condition.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, which replaces
APB No. 20,
Accounting Changes, and
SFAS No. 3,
Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim
Financial Statements — An Amendment of APB Opinion
No. 28. SFAS No. 154 provides guidance on the
accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error
corrections. It establishes retrospective application, or the
latest practicable date, as the required method for reporting a
change in accounting principle and the reporting of a correction
of an error. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting
changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning
after
December 15, 2005. We adopted SFAS No. 154
effective
February 1, 2006 and the adoption did not have an
effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial
condition.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs, an amendment of Accounting Research
Bulletin (
“ARB”) No. 43, Chapter 4,
Inventory Pricing. SFAS No. 151 amends previous
guidance regarding treatment of abnormal amounts of idle
facility expense, freight, handling costs, and spoilage.
SFAS No. 151 requires that those items be recognized
as current period charges regardless of whether they meet the
criterion of
“so abnormal” which was the criterion
specified in ARB No. 43. In addition,
SFAS No. 151 requires that allocation of fixed
production overheads to the cost of the production be based on
normal capacity of the production facilities. We adopted
SFAS No. 151 effective
February 1, 2006 and the
adoption did not have an effect on our consolidated results of
operations and financial condition.
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by
the FASB that are adopted by us as of the specified effective
date. Unless otherwise discussed, we believe that the impact of
recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements
upon adoption.
47
BUSINESS
Overview
Netezza is a leading provider of data warehouse appliances. Our
product, the Netezza Performance Server, or NPS, integrates
database, server and storage platforms in a purpose-built unit
to enable detailed queries and analyses on large volumes of
stored data. The results of these queries and analyses, often
referred to as business intelligence, provide organizations with
actionable information to improve their business operations. As
more information is recorded and communicated electronically,
the amount of data generated and the potential utility of the
business intelligence that can be extracted from this data is
increasing significantly. We designed our NPS data warehouse
appliance specifically for analysis of terabytes of data at
higher performance levels and at a lower total cost of ownership
with greater ease of use than can be achieved via traditional
data warehouse systems. Our NPS appliance performs faster,
deeper and more iterative analyses on larger amounts of detailed
data, giving our customers greater insight into trends and
anomalies in their businesses, thereby enabling better strategic
decision-making.
Unlike traditional data warehouse systems, which patch together
general-purpose database, server and storage platforms that were
not originally designed for analytical processing of large
amounts of constantly changing data, our NPS appliance is
purpose-built to deliver:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Fast data query response times through our proprietary
Intelligent Query Streaming technology.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Massive scalability through our proprietary Asymmetric Massively
Parallel Processing, or AMPP, architecture.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Simplicity of installation, operation and administration.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Cost effectiveness through the use of industry-standard server
and storage components packaged in a single unified solution.
|
Our products integrate easily through open, industry-standard
interfaces with leading data access and analytics, data
integration and data protection tools to enable quick and
accurate business intelligence. Our customers have reported
faster query performance, lower costs of ownership and improved
analytic productivity as a result of using our products.
We sell our data warehouse appliances worldwide to large global
enterprises, mid-market companies and government agencies
through our direct salesforce as well as indirectly via
distribution partners. As of
January 31, 2007, we had 87
customers and had shipped over 200 of our data warehouse
appliances. Our customers span multiple vertical industries and
include data-intensive companies and government agencies such as
Ahold, Amazon.com, AOL, American Red Cross, Blue Cross Blue
Shield of Rhode Island, Capital One Services, Catalina
Marketing, CNET Networks, CompuCredit Corporation,
LoanPerformance, Marriott, the NASD, Neiman Marcus Group,
Nielsen Company, Orange UK, Restoration Hardware, Ross Stores,
Ryder Systems, Source Healthcare Analytics, Inc., a Wolters
Kluwer Health company, the United States Army Corps of Engineers
and the United States Department of Veterans Affairs.
Industry
Background
Proliferation
of Data
Data is one of the most valued assets within an organization.
The amount of data that is being generated and kept for
availability and analysis by organizations is exploding. The
timely and comprehensive analysis of this vast amount of data is
vital to organizations in a variety of vertical industries,
including:
|
|
|
| |
•
|
Telecommunications. The telecommunications
industry is characterized by intense competition and customer
attrition, or “churn.” Targeted marketing
opportunities and the rapid response to behavior trends are
paramount to the success of telecommunications service providers
in retaining existing customers and attracting new customers.
Customer relationship management, or CRM, analyses need to be
constantly and quickly performed, to enable service providers to
market to at-risk customers before they churn, offer new
|
48
|
|
|
| |
|
products and services to those most likely to buy, and identify
and manage key customer relationships. Other key analytical
needs of telecommunications service providers include call data
record analysis for revenue assurance, billing and least-cost
routing, fraud detection and network management.
|
|
|
|
| |
•
|
E-Business. For
online businesses, the process of collecting, analyzing and
reporting data about page visits, otherwise known as click
stream analysis, is required for constant monitoring of website
performance and customer pattern changes. In addition to needing
to address the operational and customer relationship challenges
faced by traditional retailers,
e-businesses
must also analyze hundreds of millions or even billions of click
stream data records to track and respond to customer behavior
patterns in real time. Additionally, with online advertising
becoming a major revenue generator, many
e-businesses
and their advertisers need to understand who is looking at the
advertisements and their actions as a result of viewing the
advertisements. Fast analysis of online activity can enable
better cross-selling of products, prevent customers from
abandoning shopping carts or leaving the web site, and mitigate
click stream fraud.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Retail. With thousands of products and
millions of customers, many retailers need sophisticated systems
to track, manage and optimize customer and supplier
relationships. Targeted marketing programs often require the
analysis of millions of customer transactions. To prevent supply
shortages large retailers must integrate and analyze customer
transaction data, vendor delivery schedules and RFID supply
chain data. Other useful analyses for retail companies include
“market basket” analysis of the items customers buy in
a given shopping session, customer loyalty programs for frequent
buyers, overstock/understock and supply chain optimization.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Financial Services. Financial services
institutions generate terabytes of data related to millions of
client purchases, banking transactions and contacts with
marketing, sales and customer service across multiple channels.
This data contains crucial business information on client
preferences and buying behavior, and can reveal insights that
enable stronger customer relationship management and increase
the lifetime value of the customer. In addition, risk management
and portfolio management applications require analysis of vast
amounts of rapidly changing data for fraud prevention and loan
analysis. With extensive compliance and regulatory requirements,
financial institutions are required to retain an ever-increasing
amount of data and need to make this data available for detailed
reporting on a periodic basis.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Analytic Service Providers. The primary
purpose of these companies is providing business intelligence
support to enterprises on an outsourced basis. Analytic service
providers serving many industries, including retail,
telecommunications, healthcare and others, provide clients with
domain expertise in database-driven marketing and customer
segmentation. Since their clients are looking for faster
turn-arounds for more sophisticated reports on continuously
increasing amounts of data, these companies require solutions
that will scale better with lower cost of ownership to meet
their clients’ service-level agreements, while improving
their own profitability.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Government. As some of the largest creators
and consumers of data, government agencies around the world need
to access, analyze and share vast amounts of
up-to-date
data quickly and efficiently. These agencies face a broad range
of challenges, including identifying terrorist threats and
reducing fraud, waste and abuse. Iterative analysis on many
terabytes of data with high performance is crucial for achieving
these missions.
|
| |
| |
•
|
Healthcare. Healthcare providers seek to
analyze terabytes of operational and patient care data to
measure drug effectiveness and interactions, improve quality of
care and streamline operations through more cost-effective
services. Pharmaceutical companies rely on data analysis to
speed new drug development and increase marketing effectiveness.
In the future, these companies plan to incorporate large amounts
of genomic data into their analyses in order to tailor drugs for
more personalized medicine.
|
Additionally, compliance initiatives driven by government
regulations, such as those issued under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act of 1996, or HIPAA, as well as company policies requiring
data preservation, are expanding the proportion of data that
must be retained and easily accessible for future use.
49
This significant growth of enterprise data is fueling a need for
additional storage and other information technology
infrastructure to maintain and manage it. According to a 2006
report by IDC, an independent technology research organization,
worldwide shipment of disk storage systems capacity exceeded
2 million terabytes in 2005 and is forecasted to grow to
over 16 million terabytes in 2010, representing a compound
annual growth rate of approximately 51%. This growth in data is
being further fueled by a steady decline in data storage prices,
which makes storing large data sets more economical.
As the volume of data continues to grow, enterprises have
recognized the value in analyzing such data to significantly
improve their operations and competitive position. They have
also realized that frequent analysis of data at a more detailed
level is more meaningful than periodic analysis of sampled data.
These factors have driven the demand for the data warehouses
that provide the critical framework for data-driven enterprise
decision-making by way of business intelligence.
Growing
Role of the Data Warehouse
A data warehouse consists of three main elements —
database, server, and storage — and interacts with
external syste