Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration Statement (General Form) — Form S-1 Filing Table of Contents
Document/ExhibitDescriptionPagesSize 1: S-1/A Constant Contact, Inc. HTML 1.39M
2: EX-1.1 EX-1.1 Form of Underwriting Agreement HTML 197K
3: EX-5.1 EX-5.1 Opinion of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and HTML 14K
Dorr LLP
4: EX-23.1 EX-23.1 Consent of Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP HTML 6K
5: EX-23.2 EX-23.2 Consent of Vitale, Caturano & Co, Ltd. HTML 7K
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent
for service)
Copies to:
Mark G. Borden, Esq.
Philip P. Rossetti, Esq.
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr
LLP
60 State Street Boston, Massachusetts02109
(617) 526-6000
Robert P. Nault, Esq.
Constant Contact, Inc.
Reservoir Place
1601 Trapelo Road, Suite 329 Waltham, Massachusetts02451
(781) 472-8100
John R. Utzschneider, Esq.
Bingham McCutchen LLP
150 Federal Street Boston, Massachusetts02110
(617) 951-8000
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after this Registration
Statement is declared effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
“Securities Act”), check the following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
“large accelerated filer,”“accelerated
filer” and “smaller reporting company” in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated
filer o
Accelerated
filer o
Non-accelerated
filer þ
Smaller reporting
company o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
CALCULATION
OF REGISTRATION FEE
Proposed Maximum
Amount of
Amount to be
Aggregate Offering
Proposed Maximum
Registration
Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered
Registered(1)
Price Per Share(2)
Aggregate Offering Price(2)(3)
Fee(3)
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share
5,221,000
$15.96
$90,194,372
$3,546
(1)
Includes 681,000 shares of common stock that may be
purchased by the underwriters to cover over-allotments, if any.
(2)
Estimated solely for the purpose of computing the registration
fee in accordance with Rule 457(c) under the Securities
Act. Includes the offering price attributable to shares
available for purchase by the underwriters to cover
over-allotments, if any.
(3)
Calculated pursuant to Rule 457(c) based on the average of
the high and low sales prices reported in the consolidated
reporting system of the Nasdaq Global Market on April 7,2008. The Registrant previously registered 5,049,420 shares
of common stock having an aggregate maximum offering price of
$87,455,955 on a Registration Statement (File
No. 333-149918), for which a filing fee of $3,438 was paid.
A filing fee of $108 is being paid herewith on the balance of
the proposed maximum aggregate offering price of $2,738,417.
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information contained in this prospectus is not complete and may
be changed. These securities may not be sold until the
registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell
these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
Constant Contact is offering 83,409 shares of common stock
and the selling stockholders identified in this prospectus are
offering 4,456,591 shares of common stock to be sold in
this offering. Constant Contact will not receive any of the
proceeds from the sale of the shares being sold by the selling
stockholders.
Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Market under the
symbol “CTCT.” The last reported sale price of our
common stock on April 10, 2008 was $16.50.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See “Risk
Factors” beginning on page 9.
Per Share
Total
Price to the public
$
$
Underwriting discount
$
$
Proceeds, before expenses, to Constant Contact
$
$
Proceeds, before expenses, to the selling stockholders
$
$
We and the selling stockholders have granted an over-allotment
option to the underwriters. Under this option, the underwriters
may elect to purchase a maximum of 681,000 additional
shares (231,056 from us and 449,944 from the selling
stockholders) within 30 days following the date of this
prospectus to cover over-allotments.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares against payment in
New York, New York
on ,
2008.
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus. You should read the following summary together
with the more detailed information appearing in this prospectus,
including our financial statements and related notes, and the
risk factors beginning on page 9, before deciding whether
to purchase shares of our common stock. Unless the context
otherwise requires, we use the terms “Constant
Contact,”“our company,”“we,”“us” and “our” in this prospectus to refer
to Constant Contact, Inc. and our wholly-owned subsidiary.
Constant
Contact
Overview
Constant Contact is a leading provider of on-demand email
marketing and online survey solutions for small organizations,
including small businesses, associations and non-profits. As of
December 31, 2007, we had over 164,000 email marketing
customers. Our customers use our email marketing product to more
effectively and efficiently create, send and track professional
and affordable permission-based email marketing campaigns. With
these campaigns, our customers can build stronger relationships
with their customers, clients and members, increase sales and
expand membership. Our email marketing product incorporates a
wide range of customizable templates to assist in campaign
creation, user-friendly tools to import and manage contact lists
and intuitive reporting to track campaign effectiveness. In June
2007, we introduced an online survey product that complements
our email marketing product and enables small organizations to
easily create and send surveys and effectively analyze
responses. As of December 31, 2007, we had over 8,000
survey customers, substantially all of which were also email
marketing customers. We are committed to providing our customers
with a high level of support, which we deliver via phone, chat,
email and our website.
Our email marketing customer base has grown steadily from
approximately 25,000 at the end of 2004 to over 164,000 as of
December 31, 2007. We estimate that approximately
two-thirds of our customers have fewer than ten employees and in
2007 our top 80 email marketing customers accounted for
approximately 1% of our total email marketing revenue. Our email
marketing customers pay a monthly subscription fee that
generally ranges between $15 per month and $150 per month based
on the size of their contact lists and, in some cases, volume of
mailings. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the average
monthly amount that we invoiced a customer for our email
marketing solution alone was approximately $33. In addition, in
2007, the average monthly total revenue per email marketing
customer, including all sources of revenue, was $33.63. We
believe that the simplicity of on-demand deployment combined
with our affordable subscription fees and functionality
facilitate adoption of our solutions by our target customers
while generating significant recurring revenue. From January
2005 through December 2007, at least 97.4% of our customers in a
given month have continued to utilize our email marketing
product in the following month. Since the first quarter of 2002,
we have achieved 24 consecutive quarters of growth in customers
and revenue.
We acquire our customers through a variety of sources including
online advertising, channel partnerships, regional initiatives,
referrals and general brand awareness. Our online advertising
includes search engine marketing and advertising on networks and
other sites. Our channel partnerships are contractual
relationships with over 2,300 active partners, which include
national small business service providers such as Network
Solutions, LLC, American Express Company and Career Builder, LLC
as well as local small business service providers, such as web
developers and marketing agencies, who refer customers to us
through links on their websites and outbound promotions to their
customers. Our regional initiatives include local seminars and
local advertising including print, online and radio. Referral
customers come from word-of-mouth from those among our
satisfied, growing customer base and the inclusion of a link to
our website in the footer of the more than 700 million
emails currently sent by our customers each month. Finally, we
believe our general brand awareness, press and thought
leadership initiatives and visibility drive prospects to us.
During 2007, approximately 33% of our new email marketing
customers were generated through our online marketing efforts
and approximately 14% of our new email marketing customers were
generated through our channel partners. We believe the remaining
53% came from the combination of regional initiatives, referrals
and general brand awareness.
We were founded in 1995 and our on-demand email marketing
product was first offered commercially in 2000. In 2007, our
revenue was $50.5 million and our net loss was
$8.3 million.
We believe that small organizations represent a large market for
email marketing. Based on statistics compiled by the
U.S. Small Business Administration, one of the selling
stockholders in this offering, and others, we believe that our
email marketing product could potentially address the needs of
more than 28 million small organizations in the United
States. We believe that all small organizations could benefit by
communicating regularly with their constituents and, further,
that email marketing with our product is an effective and
affordable method to facilitate this type of communication. As
of December 2007, we had customers in at least 871 of the 1,005
4-digit standard industrial classification, or SIC, codes, which
is a method the U.S. government uses to classify industries in
the U.S.
To date, however, small organizations have been slower than
large organizations to adopt email marketing. Many small
organizations lack familiarity with the benefits of email
marketing and an understanding of how to prepare, execute and
measure a campaign. Similarly, they often do not have the
technical expertise necessary to implement email marketing
software or the financial resources to hire in-house staff or
retain an outside agency to support the effort. We believe that
existing alternatives, primarily the use of general email
applications, are poorly suited to meeting the email marketing
needs of small organizations. General email applications and
services, such as Microsoft
Outlook®,
America
Online®
or Microsoft
Hotmail®,
are generally designed for
one-on-one
emails and do not have the formatting, graphics or links needed
to produce effective email marketing campaigns. The other major
alternative is enterprise email marketing providers that offer
sophisticated services for large organizations with sizeable
marketing budgets and deliver services at a price and scale far
beyond the scope of most small organizations. As a result, we
believe there is a significant opportunity for an email
marketing product tailored to the needs of small organizations.
Our
Products and Services
We provide small organizations with a convenient, effective and
affordable way to communicate with their constituents. Our email
marketing product provides customers with the following features:
•
Campaign Creation Wizard. A comprehensive, easy-to-use
interface that enables our customers to create and edit email
campaigns.
•
Professionally Developed Templates. Pre-designed email
message forms that help our customers to quickly create
attractive and professional campaigns.
•
Contact List Management. These tools help our customers
build and manage their email contact lists.
•
Email Tracking and Reporting. These features enable our
customers to review and analyze the overall effectiveness of a
campaign by tracking and reporting aggregate and individualized
information.
•
Email Delivery Management. These tools are incorporated
throughout our email marketing product and are designed to
maintain our high deliverability rates.
•
Image Hosting. This feature enables customers to store up
to five images for free, view and edit these images and resize
them as necessary.
•
Email Archive. This service allows customers to create a
hosted version of current and past email communications on our
system and make them readily available to their constituents via
a link on a customer’s website.
•
Security and Privacy. We protect our customers’ data
and require that our customers adopt a privacy policy to assist
them in complying with government regulations and email
marketing best practices.
In addition, we offer our customers an online survey product to
enable them to survey their customers, clients or members and
analyze the responses. Our survey product provides customers
with a survey creation wizard, over 40 different preformatted
and customizable survey templates, list management capabilities
and live customer support.
We believe that the following business strengths differentiate
us from our competitors and are key to our success:
•
Focus on Small Organizations
•
Efficient Customer Acquisition Model
•
High Degree of Recurring Revenue
•
Consistent Commitment to Customer Service
•
Software-as-a-Service
Delivery
Growth
Strategy
Our objective is to grow our market leadership through the
following strategies:
•
Acquire New Customers. We aggressively seek to continue
to attract new customers by promoting the Constant Contact brand
and encouraging small organizations to try our products.
•
Increase Revenue Per Customer. As of December 31,2007, we had an email marketing customer base in excess of
164,000 and a survey customer base of over 8,000, substantially
all of which were also email marketing customers. We seek to
increase revenue by cross selling products and selling add-on
services that are designed to enhance our products, such as
image hosting and email archive.
•
Provide Additional Products. We plan to continue to
invest in research and development to maintain our leadership
position in email marketing and to develop and provide our
customers with complementary products that are easy-to-use,
effective and affordable.
•
Expand Internationally. Customers in over 110 countries
and territories currently use our email marketing product,
despite limited marketing efforts outside the United States, and
we believe that opportunities exist to more aggressively market
our products in English-speaking countries.
•
Pursue Complementary Acquisitions. We follow industry
developments and technology advancements and intend to evaluate
and acquire technologies or businesses to cost-effectively
enhance our products, access new customers or markets or both.
Recent
Event — Selected Financial Results and Operating
Metrics for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
We have calculated our results for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 and those results are as follows:
•
our revenue was $18,167,000;
•
our net income was $338,000;
•
our adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial number (and
discussed in greater detail below), was $804,000;
•
our email marketing customer base at March 31, 2008
was 185,948 and our net email marketing customer additions
for the first quarter were 21,279;
•
the average monthly total revenue per email marketing customer,
including all sources of revenue, was $34.57;
•
our email marketing customer retention rate, which is defined as
the number of customers in a given month that have continued to
utilize our email marketing product in the following month,
remained within a range of 97.8%, plus or minus 0.5%;
the number of customers in our $15.00 and $30.00 monthly
pricing tiers remained within a range of 80%, plus or minus
1%; and
•
the average amount that we invoiced our customers for our email
marketing solution alone remained within a range of $33.00, plus
or minus $2.00.
Our prepaid assets at March 31, 2008 included $354,000 of
capitalized costs related to this offering. If we elect to not
proceed with this offering prior to the time we file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, we would expense
these costs and our net income and adjusted EBITDA for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 would be reduced by the amount
of the expense.
You should consider this additional information in conjunction
with the audited consolidated financial statements for the
three-year period ended December 31, 2007 and the notes
thereto, as well as “Risk Factors,”“Forward-Looking Statements,”“Selected Financial
Data” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
Adjusted
EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that is
calculated by taking net income calculated in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, subtracting
interest income and adding depreciation and amortization, and
stock-based compensation. The following is a reconciliation of
net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure,
to adjusted EBITDA:
We believe that adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to
our management, investors and potential investors regarding
certain financial and business trends relating to our financial
condition and results of operations. Our management uses this
non-GAAP financial measure to compare our performance to that of
prior periods for trend analyses, for purposes of determining
executive incentive compensation and for budgeting and planning
purposes. This measure is used in monthly financial reports
prepared for management and in quarterly financial reports
presented to our board of directors. We believe that the use of
this non-GAAP financial measure provides an additional tool for
our investors and potential investors to use in evaluating our
ongoing operating results and trends and in comparing our
financial measures with those of other software-as-a-service
companies, many of which present similar non-GAAP financial
measures to investors.
Our management does not consider adjusted EBITDA in isolation or
as an alternative to financial measures determined in accordance
with GAAP. The principal limitation of using adjusted EBITDA as
a financial measure is that it excludes significant expenses and
income that are required by GAAP to be recorded. In addition,
the use of adjusted EBITDA is subject to inherent limitations as
it reflects the exercise of judgments by our management about
which expenses and income are excluded from adjusted EBITDA. In
order to
compensate for these limitations, our management presents the
non-GAAP financial measure alongside our GAAP results. We urge
you to review the reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial
measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure
presented above and not to rely on any single financial measure
to evaluate our business prior to deciding whether to purchase
our common stock in this offering.
Corporate
Information
We were incorporated in Massachusetts in August 1995 under the
name Roving Software Incorporated. We reincorporated in Delaware
in July 2000 and changed our name to Constant Contact, Inc. in
December 2006. Our principal executive offices are located at
Reservoir Place, 1601 Trapelo Road, Suite 329, Waltham,
Massachusetts02451, and our telephone number is
(781) 472-8100.
Our website address is www.constantcontact.com. Information
contained on our website or that may be accessed through links
on our website is not incorporated by reference into this
prospectus, and you should not consider information contained on
our website to be part of this prospectus or in deciding whether
to purchase shares of our common stock.
Constant
Contact®,
Do-It-Yourself Email
Marketing®,
SafeUnsubscribe®,
Email Marketing
101®,
Email Marketing Hints &
Tips®
and other trademarks or service marks of Constant Contact
appearing in this prospectus are the property of Constant
Contact. This prospectus contains additional trade names,
trademarks and service marks of other companies.
We intend to use our net proceeds from this offering to pay the
expenses we incur in connection with this offering and, the
remaining proceeds, if any, will be used for general corporate
purposes. We will not receive any proceeds from the shares sold
by the selling stockholders. See “Use of Proceeds” for
more information.
Nasdaq Global Market symbol
CTCT
The number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding after
this offering is based on (i) 27,617,014 shares of common
stock outstanding as of December 31, 2007 and (ii) an
additional 1,159 shares of common stock to be issued to certain
selling stockholders in connection with this offering upon the
exercise of stock options, and excludes:
•
2,199,983 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise
of stock options and a warrant outstanding as of
December 31, 2007 at a weighted average exercise price of
$6.33 per share, of which options and a warrant to purchase
an aggregate of 572,539 shares of our common stock were
exercisable as of December 31, 2007 with a weighted average
exercise price of $2.00 per share (both after giving effect
to the option exercises described in (ii) above); and
•
2,157,450 shares of common stock available for future
issuance under our equity compensation plans as of
December 31, 2007.
Except as otherwise noted, all information in this prospectus
assumes no exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment
option.
The following tables present our summary statements of
operations data for the three years ended December 31,2007, and our summary historical and as adjusted balance sheet
data as of December 31, 2007. The summary statements of
operations data for the three years ended December 31, 2007
and the summary balance sheet data as of December 31, 2007
are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements
for the three years ended December 31, 2007 included
elsewhere in this prospectus. Our historical results for prior
periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected
for any future period. You should read this data together with
our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in
this prospectus and the information under “Selected
Financial Data” and “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
The following table summarizes our balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2007:
•
on an actual basis; and
•
on an as adjusted basis to reflect (i) the receipt by us of
estimated net proceeds of $676,000 from the sale of
83,409 shares of common stock offered by us, at an assumed
public offering price of $16.50 per share, which is the
last reported sale price of our common stock on April 10,2008, after deducting the estimated underwriting discount and
offering expenses payable by us and (ii) the issuance of
1,159 shares of common stock upon the exercise of options
to be sold by certain selling stockholders in this offering.
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of
risk. In deciding whether to invest, you should carefully
consider the following risk factors. Any of the following risks
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations or prospects and cause the
value of our common stock to decline, which could cause you to
lose all or part of your investment. When determining whether to
invest, you should also refer to the other information in this
prospectus, including the financial statements and related
notes.
RISKS
RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY
If we
are unable to attract new customers and retain existing
customers on a cost-effective basis, our business and results of
operations will be affected adversely.
To succeed, we must continue to attract and retain a large
number of customers on a cost-effective basis, many of whom have
not previously used an email marketing service. We rely on a
variety of methods to attract new customers, such as paying
providers of online services, search engines, directories and
other websites to provide content, advertising banners and other
links that direct customers to our website and including a link
to our website in substantially all of our customers’
emails. In addition, we are committed to providing our customers
with a high level of support. As a result, we believe many of
our new customers are referred to us by existing customers. If
we are unable to use any of our current marketing initiatives or
the costs of such initiatives were to significantly increase or
our efforts to satisfy our existing customers are not
successful, we may not be able to attract new customers or
retain existing customers on a cost-effective basis and, as a
result, our revenue and results of operations would be affected
adversely.
Our
business is substantially dependent on the market for email
marketing services for small organizations.
We derive, and expect to continue to derive, substantially all
of our revenue from our email marketing product for small
organizations, including small businesses, associations and
non-profits. As a result, widespread acceptance of email
marketing among small organizations is critical to our future
growth and success. The overall market for email marketing and
related services is relatively new and still evolving, and small
organizations have generally been slower than larger
organizations to adopt email marketing as part of their
marketing mix. There is no certainty regarding how or whether
this market will develop, or whether it will experience any
significant contractions. Our ability to attract and retain
customers will depend in part on our ability to make email
marketing convenient, effective and affordable. If small
organizations determine that email marketing does not
sufficiently benefit them, existing customers may cancel their
accounts and new customers may decide not to adopt email
marketing. In addition, many small organizations lack the
technical expertise to effectively send email marketing
campaigns. As technology advances, however, small organizations
may establish the capability to manage their own email marketing
and therefore have no need for our email marketing product. If
the market for email marketing services fails to grow or grows
more slowly than we currently anticipate, demand for our
services may decline and our revenue would suffer.
U.S.
federal legislation entitled Controlling the Assault of
Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003 imposes
certain obligations on the senders of commercial emails, which
could minimize the effectiveness of our email marketing product,
and establishes financial penalties for non-compliance, which
could increase the costs of our business.
In December 2003, Congress enacted Controlling the Assault of
Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003, or the
CAN-SPAM Act, which establishes certain requirements for
commercial email messages and specifies penalties for the
transmission of commercial email messages that are intended to
deceive the recipient as to source or content. The CAN-SPAM Act,
among other things, obligates the sender of commercial emails to
provide recipients with the ability to opt out of receiving
future emails from the sender. In addition, some states have
passed laws regulating commercial email practices that are
significantly more punitive and difficult to comply with than
the CAN-SPAM Act, particularly Utah and Michigan, which have
enacted do-not-email registries listing minors who do not wish
to receive unsolicited commercial email that
markets certain covered content, such as adult or other harmful
products. Some portions of these state laws may not be preempted
by the CAN-SPAM Act. The ability of our customers’
constituents to opt out of receiving commercial emails may
minimize the effectiveness of our email marketing product.
Moreover, non-compliance with the CAN-SPAM Act carries
significant financial penalties. If we were found to be in
violation of the CAN-SPAM Act, applicable state laws not
preempted by the CAN-SPAM Act, or foreign laws regulating the
distribution of commercial email, whether as a result of
violations by our customers or if we were deemed to be directly
subject to and in violation of these requirements, we could be
required to pay penalties, which would adversely affect our
financial performance and significantly harm our reputation and
our business. We also may be required to change one or more
aspects of the way we operate our business, which could impair
our ability to attract and retain customers or increase our
operating costs.
If
economic or other factors negatively affect the small business
sector, our customers may become unwilling or unable to maintain
accounts with us, which could cause our revenue to decline and
impair our ability to operate profitably.
Our email marketing and survey products are designed
specifically for small organizations, including small
businesses, associations and non-profits that frequently have
limited budgets and are more likely to be significantly affected
by economic downturns than their larger, more established
counterparts. Small organizations may choose to spend the
limited funds that they have on items other than our products.
Moreover, if small organizations experience economic hardship,
they may be unwilling or unable to expend resources on
marketing, which would negatively affect the overall demand for
our products and could cause our revenue to decline. In
addition, we have limited experience operating our business
during an economic downturn. Accordingly, we do not know if our
current business model will respond effectively to the
challenges we may confront during an economic downturn.
Evolving
regulations concerning data privacy may restrict our
customers’ ability to solicit, collect, process and use
data necessary to conduct email marketing campaigns or to send
surveys and analyze the results or may increase their costs,
which could harm our business.
Federal, state and foreign governments have enacted, and may in
the future enact, laws and regulations concerning the
solicitation, collection, processing or use of consumers’
personal information. Such laws and regulations may require
companies to implement privacy and security policies, permit
users to access, correct and delete personal information stored
or maintained by such companies, inform individuals of security
breaches that affect their personal information, and, in some
cases, obtain individuals’ consent to use personal
information for certain purposes. Other proposed legislation
could, if enacted, prohibit the use of certain technologies that
track individuals’ activities on web pages or that record
when individuals click through to an Internet address contained
in an email message. Such laws and regulations could restrict
our customers’ ability to collect and use email addresses,
page viewing data, and personal information, which may reduce
demand for our products.
As
Internet commerce develops, federal, state and foreign
governments may draft and propose new laws to regulate Internet
commerce, which may negatively affect our
business.
As Internet commerce continues to evolve, increasing regulation
by federal, state or foreign governments becomes more likely.
Our business could be negatively impacted by the application of
existing laws and regulations or the enactment of new laws
applicable to email marketing. The cost to comply with such laws
or regulations could be significant and would increase our
operating expenses, and we may be unable to pass along those
costs to our customers in the form of increased subscription
fees. In addition, federal, state and foreign governmental or
regulatory agencies may decide to impose taxes on services
provided over the Internet or via email. Such taxes could
discourage the use of the Internet and email as a means of
commercial marketing, which would adversely affect the viability
of our products.
In the
event we are unable to minimize our loss of existing customers
or to grow our customer base by adding new customers, our
operating results will be adversely affected.
Our growth strategy requires us to minimize the loss of our
existing customers and grow our customer base by adding new
customers. Customers cancel their accounts for many reasons,
including a perception that they do not use our product
effectively, the service is a poor value and they can manage
their email campaigns without our product. In some cases, we
terminate an account because the customer fails to comply with
our standard terms and conditions. We must continually add new
customers to replace customers whose accounts are cancelled or
terminated, which may involve significantly higher marketing
expenditures than we currently anticipate. If too many of our
customers cancel our service, or if we are unable to attract new
customers in numbers sufficient to grow our business, our
operating results would be adversely affected.
As we
expand our customer base through our marketing efforts, our new
customers may use our products differently than our existing
customers and, accordingly, our business model may not be as
efficient at attracting and retaining new
customers.
As we expand our customer base, our new customers may use our
products differently than our existing customers. For example, a
greater percentage of new customers may take advantage of the
free trial period we offer but choose to use another form of
marketing to reach their constituents. If our new customers are
not as loyal as our existing customers, our attrition rate will
increase and our customer referrals will decrease, which would
have an adverse effect on our results of operations. In
addition, as we seek to expand our customer base, we expect to
increase our marketing spend in order to attract new customers,
which will increase our operating costs. There can be no
assurance that these marketing efforts will be successful.
The
market in which we participate is competitive and, if we do not
compete effectively, our operating results could be
harmed.
The market for our products is competitive and rapidly changing,
and the barriers to entry are relatively low. With the
introduction of new technologies and the influx of new entrants
to the market, we expect competition to persist and intensify in
the future, which could harm our ability to increase sales and
maintain our prices.
Our principal competitors include providers of email marketing
products for small to medium size businesses such as Vertical
Response, Inc., Broadwick Corporation
(iContact®,
formerly Intellicontact), CoolerEmail, Inc., Emma, Inc.,
Got Corporation
(Campaigner®),
Lyris Technologies, Inc. and Topica Inc., as well as the
in-house information technology capabilities of prospective
customers. Competition could result in reduced sales, reduced
margins or the failure of our email marketing product to achieve
or maintain more widespread market acceptance, any of which
could harm our business. In addition, there are a number of
other vendors that are focused on providing email marketing
products for larger organizations, including Acxiom Digital (a
division of Acxiom Corporation), Alterian Inc., Epsilon Data
Management LLC (a subsidiary of Alliance Data Systems
Corporation), ExactTarget, Inc., Responsys Inc., Silverpop
Systems Inc. and CheetahMail, Inc. (a subsidiary of Experian
Group Limited). While we do not compete currently with vendors
serving larger customers, we may face future competition from
these providers if they determine that our target market
presents an opportunity for them. Finally, in the future, we may
experience competition from Internet Service Providers, or ISPs,
advertising and direct marketing agencies and other large
established businesses, such as Microsoft Corporation, Google
Inc. or Yahoo! Inc., possessing large, existing customer bases,
substantial financial resources and established distribution
channels. If these companies decide to develop, market or resell
competitive email marketing products, acquire one of our
existing competitors or form a strategic alliance with one of
our competitors, our ability to compete effectively could be
significantly compromised and our operating results could be
harmed. In addition, one or more of these ISPs or other
businesses could decide to offer a competitive email marketing
product at no cost or low cost in order to generate revenue as
part of a larger product offering. Our survey product competes
with similar offerings by Zoomerang (a division of Market Tools,
Inc.) and Surveymonkey.com Corporation.
Our current and potential competitors may have significantly
more financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we
do and may be able to devote greater resources to the
development, promotion, sale and
support of their products. Our potential competitors may have
more extensive customer bases and broader customer relationships
than we have. In addition, these companies may have longer
operating histories and greater name recognition than we have.
These competitors may be better able to respond quickly to new
technologies and to undertake more extensive marketing
campaigns. If we are unable to compete with such companies, the
demand for our services could substantially decline.
If the
delivery of our customers’ emails is limited or blocked,
the fees we may be able to charge for our email marketing
product may not be accepted by the market and customers may
cancel their accounts.
ISPs can block emails from reaching their users. Recent releases
of ISP software and the implementation of stringent new policies
by ISPs make it more difficult to deliver our customers’
emails. We continually improve our own technology and work
closely with ISPs to maintain our deliverability rates. If ISPs
materially limit or halt the delivery of our customers’
emails, or if we fail to deliver our customers’ emails in a
manner compatible with ISPs’ email handling or
authentication technologies, then the fees we charge for our
email marketing product may not be accepted by the market, and
customers may cancel their accounts.
The internet protocol addresses associated with our email
marketing product are owned and controlled by Internap Network
Services Corporation, which operates one of our third-party
hosting facilities. In connection with the establishment of a
second third-party hosting facility, we are currently migrating
to internet protocol addresses owned and controlled by us. If we
experience difficulties with this migration, our deliverability
rates could suffer and it could undermine the effectiveness of
our customers’ email marketing campaigns. This, in turn,
could harm our business and financial performance.
Competition
for our employees is intense, and we may not be able to attract
and retain the highly skilled employees whom we need to support
our business.
Competition for highly skilled technical and marketing personnel
is extremely intense, and we continue to face difficulty
identifying and hiring qualified personnel in many areas of our
business. We may not be able to hire and retain such personnel
at compensation levels consistent with our existing compensation
and salary structure. Many of the companies with which we
compete for experienced employees have greater resources than we
have and may be able to offer more attractive terms of
employment. In particular, candidates making employment
decisions, particularly in high-technology industries, often
consider the value of any equity they may receive in connection
with their employment. Any significant volatility in the price
of our stock may adversely affect our ability to attract or
retain highly skilled technical and marketing personnel.
In addition, we invest significant time and expense in training
our employees, which increases their value to competitors who
may seek to recruit them. If we fail to retain our employees, we
could incur significant expenses in hiring and training their
replacements and the quality of our services and our ability to
serve our customers could diminish, resulting in a material
adverse effect on our business.
If we
fail to promote and maintain our brand in a cost-effective
manner, we may lose market share and our revenue may
decrease.
We believe that developing and maintaining awareness of the
Constant Contact brand in a cost-effective manner is critical to
achieving widespread acceptance of our existing and future
products and attracting new customers. Furthermore, we believe
that the importance of brand recognition will increase as
competition in our industry increases. Successful promotion of
our brand will depend largely on the effectiveness of our
marketing efforts and the effectiveness and affordability of our
products for our target customer demographic. Historically, our
efforts to build our brand have involved significant expense,
and it is likely that our future marketing efforts will require
us to incur additional significant expenses. Such brand
promotion activities may not yield increased revenue and, even
if they do, any revenue increases may not offset the expenses we
incur to promote our brand. If we fail to successfully promote
and maintain our brand, or if we incur substantial expenses in
an unsuccessful attempt to promote and maintain our brand, we
may lose our existing customers to our competitors or be unable
to attract new customers, which would cause our revenue to
decrease.
We
depend on search engines to attract a significant percentage of
our customers, and if those search engines change their listings
or our relationship with them deteriorates or terminates, we may
be unable to attract new customers, which would adversely affect
our business and results of operations.
Many of our customers located our website by clicking through on
search results displayed by search engines such as Google and
Yahoo!. Search engines typically provide two types of search
results, algorithmic and purchased listings. Algorithmic
listings cannot be purchased, and instead are determined and
displayed solely by a set of formulas designed by the search
engine. Purchased listings can be purchased by advertisers in
order to attract users to their websites. We rely on both
algorithmic and purchased listings to attract a significant
percentage of the customers we serve to our website. Search
engines revise their algorithms from time to time in an attempt
to optimize their search result listings. If search engines on
which we rely for algorithmic listings modify their algorithms,
this could result in fewer customers clicking through to our
website, requiring us to resort to other costly resources to
replace this traffic, which, in turn, could reduce our operating
and net income or our revenue, harming our business. If one or
more search engines on which we rely for purchased listings
modifies or terminates its relationship with us, our expenses
could rise, or our revenue could decline and our business may
suffer. The cost of purchased search listing advertising is
rapidly increasing as demand for these channels continues to
grow quickly, and further increases could have negative effects
on our financial results.
The
success of our business depends on the continued growth and
acceptance of email as a communications tool, and the related
expansion and reliability of the Internet infrastructure. If
consumers do not continue to use email, demand for our email
marketing products may decline.
The future success of our business depends on the continued and
widespread adoption of email as a primary means of
communication. Security problems such as “viruses,”“worms” and other malicious programs or reliability
issues arising from outages and damage to the Internet
infrastructure could create the perception that email is not a
safe and reliable means of communication, which would discourage
consumers from using email. Consumers’ use of email also
depends on the ability of ISPs to prevent unsolicited bulk
email, or “spam,” from overwhelming consumers’
inboxes. In recent years, ISPs have developed new technologies
to filter unwanted messages before they reach users’
inboxes. In response, spammers have employed more sophisticated
techniques to reach consumers’ inboxes. Although companies
in the anti-spam industry have started to address the techniques
used by spammers, if security problems become widespread or
frequent or if ISPs cannot effectively control spam, the use of
email as a means of communication may decline as consumers find
alternative ways to communicate. Any decrease in the use of
email would reduce demand for our email marketing product and
harm our business.
Various
private spam blacklists have in the past interfered with, and
may in the future interfere with, the effectiveness of our
products and our ability to conduct business.
We depend on email to market to and communicate with our
customers, and our customers rely on email to communicate with
their constituents. Various private entities attempt to regulate
the use of email for commercial solicitation. These entities
often advocate standards of conduct or practice that
significantly exceed current legal requirements and classify
certain email solicitations that comply with current legal
requirements as spam. Some of these entities maintain
“blacklists” of companies and individuals, and the
websites, ISPs and Internet protocol addresses associated with
those entities or individuals, that do not adhere to those
standards of conduct or practices for commercial email
solicitations that the blacklisting entity believes are
appropriate. If a company’s Internet protocol addresses are
listed by a blacklisting entity, emails sent from those
addresses may be blocked if they are sent to any Internet domain
or Internet address that subscribes to the blacklisting
entity’s service or purchases its blacklist.
Some of our Internet protocol addresses currently are listed
with one or more blacklisting entities and, in the future, our
Internet protocol addresses may also be listed with these and
other blacklisting entities. There can be no guarantee that we
will not continue to be blacklisted or that we will be able to
successfully remove ourselves from those lists. Blacklisting of
this type could interfere with our ability to market our
products and services and communicate with our customers and
could undermine the effectiveness of our customers’ email
marketing campaigns, all of which could have a material negative
impact on our business and results of operations.
Any
efforts we may make in the future to promote our services to
market segments other than small organizations or to expand our
product offerings beyond email marketing may not
succeed.
To date, we have largely focused our business on providing our
email marketing product for small organizations, but we may in
the future seek to serve other market segments and expand our
service offerings. During 2007, we introduced our survey
product, which enables customers to create and send online
surveys and analyze responses, and our add-on email archive
service that enables our customers to archive their past email
campaigns. Any efforts to expand beyond the small organization
market or to introduce new products beyond our email marketing
product, including our survey product, may not result in
significant revenue growth, may divert management resources from
our existing operations and require us to commit significant
financial resources to an unproven business, which may harm our
financial performance.
Our
customers’ use of our products to transmit negative
messages or website links to harmful applications could damage
our reputation, and we may face liability for unauthorized,
inaccurate or fraudulent information distributed via our
products.
Our customers could use our email marketing product to transmit
negative messages or website links to harmful applications,
reproduce and distribute copyrighted material without
permission, or report inaccurate or fraudulent data. Any such
use of our products could damage our reputation and we could
face claims for damages, copyright or trademark infringement,
defamation, negligence or fraud. Moreover, our customers’
promotion of their products and services through our email
marketing product may not comply with federal, state and foreign
laws. We cannot predict whether our role in facilitating these
activities would expose us to liability under these laws.
Even if claims asserted against us do not result in liability,
we may incur substantial costs in investigating and defending
such claims. If we are found liable for our customers’
activities, we could be required to pay fines or penalties,
redesign business methods or otherwise expend resources to
remedy any damages caused by such actions and to avoid future
liability.
Our existing general liability insurance may not cover all
potential claims to which we are exposed or may not be adequate
to indemnify us for all liabilities that may be imposed. Any
imposition of liability that is not covered by insurance or is
in excess of insurance coverage would increase our operating
losses and reduce our net worth and working capital.
If we
fail to enhance our existing products or develop new products,
our products may become obsolete or less competitive and we
could lose customers.
If we are unable to enhance our existing products or develop new
products that keep pace with rapid technological developments
and meet our customers’ needs, our business will be harmed.
Creating and designing such enhancements and new products entail
significant technical and business risks and require substantial
expenditures and lead-time, and there is no guarantee that such
enhancements and new products will be completed in a timely
fashion. Nor is there any guarantee that any new product
offerings will gain widespread acceptance among our email
marketing customers or by the broader market. For example, our
existing email marketing customers may not view any new product
as complementary to our email product offerings and therefore
decide not to purchase such product. If we cannot enhance our
existing services or develop new products or if we are not
successful in selling such enhancements and new products to our
customers, we could lose customers or have difficulty attracting
new customers, which would adversely impact our financial
performance.
Our
relationships with our channel partners may be terminated or may
not continue to be beneficial in generating new email marketing
customers, which could adversely affect our ability to increase
our customer base.
We maintain a network of active channel partners, which include
national small business service providers such as Network
Solutions, LLC, American Express Company and Career Builder, LLC
as well as local small business service providers such as web
developers and marketing agencies, who refer customers to us
through
links on their websites and outbound promotion to their
customers. If we are unable to maintain our contractual
relationships with existing channel partners or establish new
contractual relationships with potential channel partners, we
may lose potential new customers and we may experience delays
and increased costs in adding customers, which could have a
material adverse effect on us. The number of customers we are
able to add through these marketing relationships is dependent
on the marketing efforts of our partners over which we have
little or no control, and a significant decrease in the number
of gross customer additions generated through these
relationships could adversely affect the size of our customer
base and revenue.
Our
anticipated growth could strain our personnel resources and
infrastructure, and if we are unable to implement appropriate
controls and procedures to manage that growth, we may not be
able to successfully implement our business plan.
We are currently experiencing a period of rapid growth in our
headcount and operations, which has placed, and will continue to
place, to the extent that we are able to sustain such growth, a
significant strain on our management and our administrative,
operational and financial reporting infrastructure.
Our success will depend in part on the ability of our senior
management to manage this anticipated growth effectively. To do
so, we must continue to hire, train and manage new employees as
needed. If our new hires perform poorly, or if we are
unsuccessful in hiring, training, managing and integrating these
new employees, or if we are not successful in retaining our
existing employees, our business may be harmed. To manage the
anticipated growth of our operations and personnel, we will need
to continue to improve our operational and financial controls
and update our reporting procedures and systems, which will
include installing a new billing system. The expected addition
of new employees and the capital investments that we believe
will be necessary to manage our anticipated growth will increase
our cost base, which will make it more difficult for us to
offset any future revenue shortfalls by reducing expenses in the
short term. If we fail to successfully manage our anticipated
growth, we will be unable to execute our business plan.
If we
fail to retain our key personnel, we may not be able to achieve
our anticipated level of growth and our business could
suffer.
Our future depends, in part, on our ability to attract and
retain key personnel. Our future also depends on the continued
contributions of our executive officers and other key technical
personnel, each of whom would be difficult to replace. In
particular, Gail F. Goodman, our Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer, is critical to the management of our business
and operations and the development of our strategic direction.
The loss of the services of Ms. Goodman or other executive
officers or key personnel and the process to replace any of our
key personnel would involve significant time and expense and may
significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our business
objectives.
Any
significant disruption in service on our website or in our
computer systems, or in our customer support services, could
reduce the attractiveness of our products and result in a loss
of customers.
The satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of
our technology and our underlying network infrastructure are
critical to our operations, level of customer service,
reputation and ability to attract new customers and retain
existing customers. Our system hardware is co-located in two
third-party hosting facilities. The first, located in
Somerville, Massachusetts, is owned and operated by Internap
Network Services Corporation. The second, located in Bedford,
Massachusetts, is owned and operated by Sentinel
Properties-Bedford, LLC. Neither Internap nor Sentinel
guarantees that our customers’ access to our products will
be uninterrupted, error-free or secure. Our operations depend on
Internap’s and Sentinel’s ability to protect their and
our systems in their facilities against damage or interruption
from natural disasters, power or telecommunications failures,
air quality, temperature, humidity and other environmental
concerns, computer viruses or other attempts to harm our
systems, criminal acts and similar events. In the event that our
arrangement with either Internap or Sentinel is terminated, or
there is a lapse of service or damage to the Internap or
Sentinel facilities, we could experience interruptions in our
service as well as delays and additional expense in arranging
new facilities. In addition, our customer support services,
which are currently located only at our headquarters, would
experience interruptions as a result of any disruption of
electrical, phone or
any other similar facility support services. Any interruptions
or delays in access to our products or customer support, whether
as a result of Internap, Sentinel or other third-party error,
our own error, natural disasters or security breaches, whether
accidental or willful, could harm our relationships with
customers and our reputation. Also, in the event of damage or
interruption, our insurance policies may not adequately
compensate us for any losses that we may incur. These factors
could damage our brand and reputation, divert our
employees’ attention, reduce our revenue, subject us to
liability and cause customers to cancel their accounts, any of
which could adversely affect our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Our disaster recovery system located at both our headquarters in
Waltham, Massachusetts and the Sentinel facility does not
provide real time backup, has not been tested under actual
disaster conditions and may not have sufficient capacity to
recover all data and services in the event of an outage at the
Internap or Sentinel facilities. In the event of a disaster in
which either facility is irreparably damaged or destroyed, we
would experience interruptions in access to our products.
Moreover, our headquarters, the Internap facility and the
Sentinel facility are located several miles from each other and
may be equally or more affected by any regional disaster. Any or
all of these events could cause our customers to lose access to
our products.
If the
security of our customers’ confidential information stored
in our systems is breached or otherwise subjected to
unauthorized access, our reputation may be harmed, we may be
exposed to liability and we may lose the ability to offer our
customers a credit card payment option.
Our system stores our customers’ proprietary email
distribution lists, credit card information and other critical
data. Any accidental or willful security breaches or other
unauthorized access could expose us to liability for the loss of
such information, time-consuming and expensive litigation and
other possible liabilities as well as negative publicity. If
security measures are breached because of third-party action,
employee error, malfeasance or otherwise, or if design flaws in
our software are exposed and exploited, and, as a result, a
third party obtains unauthorized access to any of our
customers’ data, our relationships with our customers will
be severely damaged, and we could incur significant liability.
Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to
sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not
recognized until they are launched against a target, we and our
third-party hosting facilities may be unable to anticipate these
techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. In
addition, many states, including Massachusetts, have enacted
laws requiring companies to notify individuals of data security
breaches involving their personal data. These mandatory
disclosures regarding a security breach often lead to widespread
negative publicity, which may cause our customers to lose
confidence in the effectiveness of our data security measures.
Any security breach, whether actual or perceived, would harm our
reputation, and we could lose customers.
If we fail to maintain compliance with the data protection
policy documentation standards adopted by the major credit card
issuers, we could lose our ability to offer our customers a
credit card payment option. Any loss of our ability to offer our
customers a credit card payment option would make our products
less attractive to many small organizations by negatively
impacting our customer experience and significantly increasing
our administrative costs related to customer payment processing.
We
rely on third-party computer hardware and software that may be
difficult to replace or that could cause errors or failures of
our service.
We rely on computer hardware purchased and software licensed
from third parties in order to offer our products, including
hardware from such large vendors as International Business
Machines Corporation, Dell Computer Corporation, Sun
Microsystems, Inc. and EMC Corporation. This hardware and
software may not continue to be available on commercially
reasonable terms, or at all. If we lose the right to use any of
this hardware or software or such hardware or software
malfunctions, our customers could experience delays or be unable
to access our services until we can obtain and integrate
equivalent technology or repair the cause of the malfunctioning
hardware or software. Any delays or failures associated with our
services could upset our customers and harm our business.
If we
are unable to protect the confidentiality of our unpatented
proprietary information, processes and know-how and our trade
secrets, the value of our technology and products could be
adversely affected.
We rely upon unpatented proprietary technology, processes and
know-how and trade secrets. Although we try to protect this
information in part by executing confidentiality agreements with
our employees, consultants and third parties, such agreements
may offer only limited protection and may be breached. Any
unauthorized disclosure or dissemination of our proprietary
technology, processes and know-how or our trade secrets, whether
by breach of a confidentiality agreement or otherwise, may cause
irreparable harm to our business, and we may not have adequate
remedies for any such breach. In addition, our trade secrets may
otherwise be independently developed by our competitors or other
third parties. If we are unable to protect the confidentiality
of our proprietary information, processes and know-how or our
trade secrets are disclosed, the value of our technology and
services could be adversely affected, which could negatively
impact our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Our
use of open source software could impose limitations on our
ability to commercialize our products.
We incorporate open source software into our products. Although
we monitor our use of open source software closely, the terms of
many open source licenses to which we are subject have not been
interpreted by United States or foreign courts, and there is a
risk that such licenses could be construed in a manner that
imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability
to commercialize our products. In such event or in the event
there is a significant change in the terms of open source
licenses in general, we could be required to seek licenses from
third parties in order to continue offering our products, to
re-engineer our products or to discontinue sales of our
products, or to release our software code under the terms of an
open source license, any of which could materially adversely
affect our business.
Given the nature of open source software, there is also a risk
that third parties may assert copyright and other intellectual
property infringement claims against us based on our use of
certain open source software programs. The risks associated with
intellectual property infringement claims are discussed
immediately below.
If a
third party asserts that we are infringing its intellectual
property, whether successful or not, it could subject us to
costly and time-consuming litigation or require us to obtain
expensive licenses, and our business may be adversely
affected.
The software and Internet industries are characterized by the
existence of a large number of patents, trademarks and
copyrights and by frequent litigation based on allegations of
infringement or other violations of intellectual property
rights. Third parties may assert patent and other intellectual
property infringement claims against us in the form of lawsuits,
letters or other forms of communication. These claims, whether
or not successful, could:
•
divert management’s attention;
•
result in costly and time-consuming litigation;
•
require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements, which
may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all;
•
in the case of open source software-related claims, require us
to release our software code under the terms of an open source
license; or
•
require us to redesign our software and services to avoid
infringement.
As a result, any third-party intellectual property claims
against us could increase our expenses and adversely affect our
business. In addition, many of our agreements with our channel
partners require us to indemnify them for third-party
intellectual property infringement claims, which would increase
the cost to us resulting from an adverse ruling on any such
claim. Even if we have not infringed any third parties’
intellectual property rights, we cannot be sure our legal
defenses will be successful, and even if we are successful in
defending against such claims, our legal defense could require
significant financial resources and management time. Finally, if
a third party successfully asserts a claim that our products
infringe their proprietary rights, royalty or licensing
agreements might not be available on terms we find acceptable,
or at all.
Providing
our products to customers outside the United States exposes us
to risks inherent in international business.
Customers in more than 110 countries and territories currently
use our email marketing product, and we expect to expand our
international operations in the future. Accordingly, we are
subject to risks and challenges that we would otherwise not face
if we conducted our business only in the United States. The
risks and challenges associated with providing our products to
customers outside the United States include:
•
localization of our products, including translation into foreign
languages and associated expenses;
•
laws and business practices favoring local competitors;
•
compliance with multiple, conflicting and changing governmental
laws and regulations, including tax, email marketing, privacy
and data protection laws and regulations;
•
foreign currency fluctuations;
•
different pricing environments;
•
difficulties in staffing and maintaining foreign
operations; and
•
regional economic and political conditions.
We
have incurred net losses in the past and expect to incur net
losses in the future.
We have incurred net losses in the past and we expect to incur
net losses in the future. As of December 31, 2007, our
accumulated deficit was $42.8 million. Our net losses were
$7.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and
$8.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Our
net losses have increased over recent periods because we have
increased our sales and marketing expense to promote the
Constant Contact brand and encourage new customers to try our
products. We have not been profitable since our inception, and
we may not become profitable. In addition, we expect our
operating expenses to increase in the future as we expand our
operations. If our operating expenses exceed our expectations,
our financial performance could be adversely affected. If our
revenue does not grow to offset these increased expenses, we
will never become profitable. Our recent revenue growth may not
be indicative of our future performance. In future periods, we
may not have any revenue growth, or our revenue could decline.
We are
incurring significant increased costs as a result of operating
as a public company, and our management has been, and will
continue to be, required to devote substantial time to new
compliance initiatives.
As a public company, we are incurring significantly more legal,
accounting and other expenses than we incurred as a private
company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and rules subsequently
implemented by the SEC and the Nasdaq Stock Market, require
public companies to meet certain corporate governance standards.
Our management and other personnel are devoting a substantial
amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these
rules and regulations have increased our legal and financial
compliance costs and have made some activities more
time-consuming and costly.
In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other
things, that we maintain effective internal control over
financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. In
particular, for the year ending December 31, 2008, we must
perform system and process evaluation and testing of our
internal control over financial reporting to allow management
and our independent registered public accounting firm to report
on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial
reporting, as required by Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act. Our testing, or the subsequent testing by our independent
registered public accounting firm, may reveal deficiencies in
our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to
be material weaknesses. In order to comply with
Section 404, we may incur substantial accounting expense,
expend significant management time on compliance-related issues,
and hire additional accounting and financial staff with
appropriate public company experience and technical accounting
knowledge. Moreover, if we are not able to comply with the
requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, or if we or
our independent registered public accounting firm identify
deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting
that are deemed to
be material weaknesses, the market price of our stock would
likely decline and we could be subject to sanctions or
investigations by the Nasdaq Stock Market, the SEC or other
regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial
and management resources.
Our
ability to use net operating loss carryforwards in the United
States may be limited.
As of December 31, 2007, we had net operating loss
carryforwards of $38 million for U.S. federal tax
purposes and $25 million for state tax purposes. These loss
carryforwards expire between 2008 and 2027. If we were to
generate income that would be subject to taxation, to the extent
available, we intend to use these net operating loss
carryforwards to reduce the corporate income tax liability
associated with our operations. Section 382 of the Internal
Revenue Code generally imposes an annual limitation on the
amount of net operating loss carryforwards that may be used to
offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone
significant changes in stock ownership. While we do not believe
that our initial public offering and prior financings have
resulted in ownership changes that limit our ability to utilize
net operating loss carryforwards, any subsequent ownership
changes, including as a result of this offering, could result in
such a limitation. To the extent our use of net operating loss
carryforwards is significantly limited, our income could be
subject to corporate income tax earlier than it would if we were
able to use net operating loss carryforwards, which could have a
negative effect on our financial results.
Our
quarterly results may fluctuate and if we fail to meet the
expectations of analysts or investors, our stock price could
decline substantially.
Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate, and if we fail to
meet or exceed the expectations of securities analysts or
investors, the trading price of our common stock could decline.
Some of the important factors that could cause our revenue and
operating results to fluctuate from quarter to quarter include:
•
our ability to retain existing customers, attract new customers
and satisfy our customers’ requirements;
•
changes in our net new quarterly customer additions;
•
changes in our pricing policies;
•
our ability to expand our business;
•
the effectiveness of our personnel;
•
new product and service introductions;
•
technical difficulties or interruptions in our services;
•
general economic conditions;
•
the timing of additional investments in our hardware and
software systems;
•
regulatory compliance costs;
•
costs associated with future acquisitions of technologies and
businesses; and
•
extraordinary expenses such as litigation or other
dispute-related settlement payments.
Some of these factors are not within our control, and the
occurrence of one or more of them may cause our operating
results to vary widely. As such, we believe that
quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our revenue and operating
results may not be meaningful and should not be relied upon as
an indication of future performance.
We may
need additional capital in the future, which may not be
available to us on favorable terms, or at all, and may dilute
your ownership of our common stock.
We have historically relied on outside financing and cash from
operations to fund our operations, capital expenditures and
expansion. We may require additional capital from equity or debt
financing in the future to:
take advantage of strategic opportunities, including more rapid
expansion of our business or the acquisition of complementary
products, technologies or businesses; and
•
develop new products or enhancements to existing products.
We may not be able to secure timely additional financing on
favorable terms, or at all. The terms of any additional
financing may place limits on our financial and operating
flexibility. If we raise additional funds through issuances of
equity, convertible debt securities or other securities
convertible into equity, our existing stockholders could suffer
significant dilution in their percentage ownership of our
company, and any new securities we issue could have rights,
preferences and privileges senior to those of our common stock.
If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on
terms satisfactory to us, if and when we require it, our ability
to grow or support our business and to respond to business
challenges could be significantly limited.
We may
engage in future acquisitions that could disrupt our business,
dilute stockholder value and harm our business, operating
results or financial condition.
We have, from time to time, evaluated acquisition opportunities
and may pursue acquisition opportunities in the future. We have
not made any acquisitions to date and, therefore, our ability as
an organization to make and integrate acquisitions is unproven.
Moreover, acquisitions involve numerous risks, including:
•
an inability to locate a suitable acquisition candidate or
technology or acquire a desirable candidate or technology on
favorable terms;
•
difficulties in integrating personnel and operations from the
acquired business or acquired technology with our existing
technology and products and in retaining and motivating key
personnel from the acquired business;
•
disruptions in our ongoing operations and the diversion of our
management’s attention from their day-to-day
responsibilities associated with operating our business;
•
increases in our expenses that adversely impact our business,
operating results and financial condition;
•
potential write-offs of acquired assets and increased
amortization expense related to identifiable assets
acquired; and
•
potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities or the
incurrence of debt.
If we do complete an acquisition, we may not ultimately
strengthen our competitive position or achieve our goals, or
such an acquisition may be viewed negatively by our customers,
stockholders or the financial markets.
RISKS
RELATED TO THIS OFFERING AND OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON
STOCK
As a
new investor, you will experience substantial dilution as a
result of this offering and future equity
issuances.
The public offering price per share in this offering is
substantially higher than the pro forma net tangible book value
per share of our common stock outstanding prior to this
offering. As a result, investors purchasing common stock in this
offering will experience immediate substantial dilution of
$13.14 per share. This dilution is due in large part to the
fact that our earlier investors paid substantially less than the
public offering price when they purchased their shares of common
stock. In addition, we have issued options to acquire common
stock at prices significantly below the public offering price.
To the extent outstanding options are ultimately exercised,
there could be further dilution to investors in this offering.
In addition, if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment
option or if we issue additional equity securities, you will
experience additional dilution.
Insiders
will continue to have substantial control over us after this
offering and will be able to influence corporate
matters.
Upon completion of this offering, our directors and executive
officers and their affiliates will beneficially own, in the
aggregate, approximately 26.95% of our outstanding common stock.
As a result, these stockholders will be able to exercise
significant influence over all matters requiring stockholder
approval, including the election of directors and approval of
significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other
sale of our company or its assets. This concentration of
ownership could limit your ability to influence corporate
matters and may have the effect of delaying or preventing a
third party from acquiring control over us. For information
regarding the beneficial ownership of our outstanding stock by
our directors and executive officers, see “Principal and
Selling Stockholders.”
Our
management will have broad discretion over the use of the
proceeds we receive in this offering and might not apply the
proceeds in ways that increase the value of your
investment.
Although we have not allocated the net proceeds we will receive
from this offering for any specific purposes other than the
payment of expenses incurred by us in connection with this
offering, we expect to use any remaining net proceeds, if any,
for general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures.
Our management will have broad discretion concerning how we use
our net proceeds from this offering, and you will not have the
opportunity to influence our decisions on how to use our net
proceeds from this offering. You will be relying on the judgment
of our management regarding the application of these proceeds,
and our management may not apply our net proceeds of this
offering in ways that increase the value of your investment.
We do
not currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock and,
consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your
investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our
common stock.
We do not expect to pay cash dividends on our common stock,
including the common stock issued in this offering. Any future
dividend payments are within the absolute discretion of our
board of directors and will depend on, among other things, our
results of operations, working capital requirements, capital
expenditure requirements, financial condition, contractual
restrictions, business opportunities, anticipated cash needs,
provisions of applicable law and other factors that our board of
directors may deem relevant. We may not generate sufficient cash
from operations in the future to pay dividends on our common
stock. See “Dividend Policy.”
If
securities or industry analysts do not continue to publish
research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our
business, our stock price and trading volume could
decline.
The trading market for our common stock will depend in part on
the research and reports that securities or industry analysts
publish about us or our business. We may not be able to retain
research coverage by securities and industry analysts. If
securities or industry analysts do not continue to cover our
company, the trading price for our stock would be negatively
impacted. In the event the analysts who cover us downgrade our
stock or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our
business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more
of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to
publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could
decrease, which could cause our stock price and trading volume
to decline.
The
market price of our common stock has been and may continue to be
volatile, and you may not be able to resell shares of our common
stock at or above the price you paid.
Prior to the completion of our initial public offering in
October 2007, there was no public market for shares of our
common stock. The trading price of our common stock has been and
may continue to be highly volatile
and could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various
factors. Some of the factors that may cause the market price of
our common stock to fluctuate include:
•
fluctuations in our quarterly financial results or the quarterly
financial results of companies perceived to be similar to us;
•
changes in estimates of our financial results or recommendations
by securities analysts;
•
failure of any of our products to achieve or maintain market
acceptance;
•
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
•
success of competitive products;
•
changes in our capital structure, such as future issuances of
securities or the incurrence of debt;
•
announcements by us or our competitors of significant product
releases, contracts, acquisitions or strategic alliances;
•
regulatory developments in the United States, foreign countries
or both;
•
litigation involving our company, our general industry or both;
•
additions or departures of key personnel;
•
investors’ general perception of us; and
•
changes in general economic, industry and market conditions.
In addition, if the market for technology stocks or the stock
market in general experiences a loss of investor confidence, the
trading price of our common stock could decline for reasons
unrelated to our business, financial condition or results of
operations. If any of the foregoing occurs, it could cause our
stock price to fall and may expose us to class action lawsuits
that, even if unsuccessful, could be costly to defend and a
distraction to management.
Future
sales of shares by our stockholders could cause our stock price
to decline.
If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock
in the public market, the trading price of our common stock
could decline below the public offering price. Based on shares
outstanding as of December 31, 2007, upon completion of
this offering, we will have outstanding 27,701,582 shares
of common stock. Of these shares, 12,586,739 shares of
common stock will be subject to a
90-day
contractual
lock-up with
the underwriters. Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. and Thomas Weisel
Partners LLC, acting as representatives of the underwriters, may
permit our officers, directors and other stockholders who are
subject to the contractual
lock-up to
sell shares prior to the expiration of the
lock-up
agreements.
If we announce earnings results or other material news or a
material event occurs during the last 17 days of the
90-day
contractual
lock-up
period or, if prior to the expiration of the
lock-up
period, we announce that we will release earnings results during
the 16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
lock-up
period, the
90-day
lock-up
period will continue to apply until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the
occurrence of the material news or event.
After each of the
lock-up
agreements pertaining to this offering expire 90 days from
the date of this prospectus, or such longer period described
above, up to 12,586,739 shares will become eligible for
sale in the public market, 5,651,094 of which are held by
directors, executive officers and other affiliates and will be
subject to volume limitations under Rule 144 under the
Securities Act and, in certain cases, various vesting
agreements. If these additional shares are sold, or if it is
perceived that they will be sold, in the public market, the
trading price of our common stock could decline.
In addition, as of December 31, 2007, we had options to purchase
a total of 2,200,622 shares of our common stock outstanding
under our equity incentive plans, of which 573,178 were vested.
We have filed registration statements on Forms S-8 to
register all of the shares issuable under our equity incentive
plans. The sale of
shares registered on the Forms S-8 which are not yet
outstanding, but are issuable upon exercise of outstanding
options, may cause our stock price to decline.
Some of our existing stockholders have demand and incidental
registration rights to require us to register with the SEC up to
approximately 12,595,556 shares of our common stock subject
to certain conditions following the offering. If we register
these shares of common stock, the stockholders would be able to
sell those shares freely in the public market.
See “Shares Eligible for Future Sale” for a discussion
of the
lock-up
agreements and other transfer restrictions.
Anti-takeover
provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law could
discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company
and may affect the trading price of our common
stock.
We are a Delaware corporation and the anti-takeover provisions
of the Delaware General Corporation Law may discourage, delay or
prevent a change of control by prohibiting us from engaging in a
business combination with an interested stockholder for a period
of three years after the person becomes an interested
stockholder, even if a change of control would be beneficial to
our existing stockholders. In addition, our restated certificate
of incorporation and second amended and restated bylaws may
discourage, delay or prevent, a change in our management or
control over us that stockholders may consider favorable. Among
other things, our restated certificate of incorporation and
second amended and restated bylaws:
•
authorize the issuance of “blank check” preferred
stock that could be issued by our board of directors to thwart a
takeover attempt;
•
establish a classified board of directors, as a result of which
the successors to the directors whose terms have expired will be
elected to serve from the time of election and qualification
until the third annual meeting following their election;
•
require that directors only be removed from office for cause and
only upon a supermajority stockholder vote;
•
provide that vacancies on our board of directors, including
newly created directorships, may be filled only by a majority
vote of directors then in office;
•
limit who may call special meetings of stockholders;
•
prohibit stockholder action by written consent, requiring all
actions to be taken at a meeting of the stockholders; and
•
require supermajority stockholder voting to effect certain
amendments to our restated certificate of incorporation and
second amended and restated bylaws.
For more information regarding these and other provisions, see
“Description of Capital Stock—Anti-Takeover Effects of
Delaware Law and Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation.”
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that involve
substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements, other than
statements of historical facts, included in this prospectus
regarding our strategy, future operations, future financial
position, future revenue, projected costs, prospects, plans,
objectives of management and expected market growth are
forward-looking statements. The words “anticipate,”“believe,”“estimate,”“expect,”“intend,”“may,”“objective,”“plan,”“predict,”“project,”“seek,”“will,”“would” and
similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain
these identifying words. These forward-looking statements
include, among other things, statements about:
•
our ability to attract and retain customers;
•
our financial performance;
•
the advantages of our products as compared to those of others;
•
our ability to retain and hire necessary employees and
appropriately staff our operations;
•
regulatory developments;
•
our intellectual property; and
•
our estimates regarding future expenses, revenue, capital
requirements and needs for additional financing.
We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or
expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements, and
you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking
statements. Actual results or events could differ materially
from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the
forward-looking statements we make. We have included important
factors in the cautionary statements included in this
prospectus, particularly in the “Risk Factors”
section, that could cause actual results or events to differ
materially from the forward-looking statements that we make. Our
forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact
of any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint
ventures or investments we may make.
You should read this prospectus and the documents that we have
filed or incorporated by reference as exhibits to the
registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part,
completely and with the understanding that our actual future
results may be materially different from what we expect. We do
not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise, except as required by law.
We estimate that the net proceeds from the sale of the shares of
common stock we are offering at the assumed public offering
price of $16.50 per share, which is the last reported sale
price of our common stock on April 10, 2008, will be
approximately $676,000, or approximately $4.3 million if
the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full.
“Net proceeds” is what we expect to receive after
paying the underwriting discount and other expenses of the
offering. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of
shares by the selling stockholders. In addition, we will receive
$636 in connection with the payment of the exercise price upon
the exercise of outstanding options to purchase
1,159 shares of common stock, which shares are to be sold
in the offering.
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price
of $16.50 per share would increase (decrease) the net
proceeds to us from this offering by $79,000 and increase
(decrease) the net proceeds to the selling stockholders from
this offering by $4.2 million, assuming the number of
shares offered by us and the selling stockholders as set forth
on the cover of this prospectus remains the same.
We intend to use our net proceeds from this offering to pay the
expenses we incur in connection with this offering and, the
remaining proceeds, if any, will be used for general corporate
purposes, including financing our growth, developing new
products, acquiring new customers and funding capital
expenditures.
In addition, the other principal purposes for this offering are
to:
•
increase our visibility in our markets;
•
provide liquidity for our existing stockholders;
•
increase our public float;
•
improve the effectiveness of our equity compensation plans in
attracting and retaining key employees; and
•
enhance our ability to acquire other businesses, products or
technologies.
Other than paying the expenses we incur in connection with this
offering, we have not yet determined with any certainty the
manner in which we will allocate the remaining net proceeds we
receive in this offering, if any. Management will retain broad
discretion in the allocation and use of our net proceeds from
this offering. To the extent there are net proceeds available to
us after paying the expenses we incur in connection with this
offering, a number of factors may impact the allocation of such
proceeds, including the nature, size and type of expansion of
our operations we may undertake.
Pending specific utilization of our net proceeds as described
above, we intend to invest our net proceeds of the offering in
short-term investment grade and U.S. government securities.
Our common stock commenced trading on the Nasdaq Global Market
under the symbol “CTCT” on October 3, 2007. The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high
and low reported sales prices of our common stock as reported on
the Nasdaq Global Market:
As of April 9, 2008, there were approximately
126 holders of record of our common stock. The last
reported sale price of our common stock on April 10, 2008
was $16.50 per share.
We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common
stock. We currently intend to retain earnings, if any, to
finance the growth and development of our business, and we do
not expect to pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the
foreseeable future. Payment of future dividends, if any, will be
at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on
our financial condition, results of operations, capital
requirements, restrictions contained in current or future
financing instruments, and other factors our board of directors
deems relevant.
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of
December 31, 2007:
•
on an actual basis; and
•
on an as adjusted basis to (i) give effect to the issuance and
sale by us of 83,409 shares of common stock at an assumed
offering price of $16.50 per share, which was the last reported
sale price of our common stock on April 10, 2008, after
deducting the estimated underwriting discount and offering
expenses payable by us and (ii) reflect the issuance of
1,159 shares of common stock upon the exercise of options
to be sold by certain selling stockholders in connection with
this offering.
You should read the following table together with our financial
statements and the related notes and “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
Common stock; $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares
authorized and 27,617,014 shares issued and outstanding,
actual; 100,000,000 shares authorized and
27,701,582 shares issued and outstanding, as adjusted
$
276
$
277
Preferred stock; $0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares
authorized and no shares issued or outstanding, actual or
as adjusted
—
—
Additional paid-in capital
136,832
137,507
Accumulated other comprehensive income
2
2
Accumulated deficit
(42,756
)
(42,756
)
Total stockholders’ equity
94,354
95,030
Total capitalization
$
94,354
$
95,030
The table above does not include:
•
520 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of a
warrant outstanding as of December 31, 2007 with an
exercise price of $0.38 per share;
•
2,199,463 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise
of stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2007 at a
weighted average exercise price of $6.33 per share, of
which options to purchase 572,019 shares were exercisable
as of December 31, 2007 at a weighted average exercise
price of $2.00 per share (both after giving effect to the
contemplated issuance by us of 1,159 shares of common stock
upon the exercise of options by certain selling
stockholders); and
•
2,157,450 shares of common stock available for future
issuance under our equity compensation plans as of
December 31, 2007.
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price
of $16.50 per share would increase (decrease) each of additional
paid-in
capital and total stockholders’ equity in the as adjusted
column by $79,000, assuming the number of shares offered by us,
as set forth on the cover of this prospectus, remains the same
and after deducting the estimated underwriting discount and
offering expenses payable by us.
If you invest in our common stock, your interest will be diluted
immediately to the extent of the difference between the public
offering price per share you will pay in this offering and the
as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common
stock after this offering.
Our net tangible book value as of December 31, 2007 was
approximately $92.3 million, or approximately
$3.34 per share of common stock. Net tangible book value
per share is calculated by subtracting our total liabilities
from our total tangible assets, which is total assets less
intangible assets, and dividing this amount by the number of
shares of common stock outstanding. After giving effect to the
sale by us of the 83,409 shares of common stock offered in
this offering at an assumed public offering price of $16.50 per
share, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the
NASDAQ Global Market on April 10, 2008, and after deducting
estimated underwriting discounts and offering expenses payable
by us, our as adjusted net tangible book value as of
December 31, 2007 would have been approximately
$93.0 million, or approximately $3.36 per share of common
stock. This represents an immediate increase in the as adjusted
net tangible book value of $0.02 per share to our existing
stockholders and an immediate and substantial dilution in net
tangible book value of $13.14 per share to new investors. The
following table illustrates this per share dilution:
Increase in net tangible book value per share attributable to
this offering
$
0.02
As adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering
$
3.36
Dilution per share to new investors
$
13.14
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price
per share of our common stock would not affect our as adjusted
net tangible book value per share after giving effect to this
offering and would increase (decrease) the dilution in as
adjusted net tangible book value per share to the new investors
after giving effect to this offering by $1.00, after deducting
the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us.
In the discussion and table above, we assume no exercise of
outstanding options or warrants, except for the exercise of
options to purchase 1,159 shares of common stock being sold
by certain selling stockholders in this offering. As of
December 31, 2007, there were 2,199,463 shares of
common stock reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding
options with a weighted average exercise price of $6.33 per
share (after giving effect to the issuance by us of 1,159 shares
of common stock upon the exercise of options by certain selling
stockholders) and 520 shares of common stock reserved for
issuance upon the exercise of an outstanding warrant with an
exercise price of $0.38 per share. To the extent that any
of these outstanding options or the warrant are exercised, there
will be further dilution to new investors. If the underwriters
exercise their over-allotment option, there will be further
dilution to new investors.
The selected statement of operations data for each of the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 and the balance sheet data
as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 have been derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements, which have been
audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, and are included elsewhere in this
prospectus. The selected statement of operations data for the
year ended December 31, 2005 has been derived from our
audited financial statements, which have been audited by Vitale,
Caturano & Company, Ltd., an independent registered
public accounting firm, and are included elsewhere in this
prospectus. The selected statements of operations data for each
of the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005
have been derived from our audited financial statements, which
have been audited by Vitale, Caturano & Company, Ltd.,
an independent registered public accounting firm, and are not
included in this prospectus. The selected financial data set
forth below summarizes our consolidated financial data and
should be read in conjunction with “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” and our financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus. The historical results
are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in
any future period.
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our
financial condition and results of operations together with our
financial statements and the related notes and other financial
information included elsewhere in this prospectus. Some of the
information contained in this discussion and analysis or set
forth elsewhere in this prospectus, including information with
respect to our plans and strategy for our business and related
financing, includes forward-looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. You should review the “Risk
Factors” section of this prospectus for a discussion of
important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from the results described in or implied by the
forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion
and analysis.
Overview
Constant Contact is a leading provider of on-demand email
marketing and online survey solutions for small organizations,
including small businesses, associations and non-profits. Our
customers use our email marketing product to more effectively
and efficiently create, send and track professional and
affordable permission-based email marketing campaigns. With
these campaigns, our customers can build stronger relationships
with their customers, clients and members, increase sales and
expand membership. Our email marketing product incorporates a
wide range of customizable templates to assist in campaign
creation, user-friendly tools to import and manage contact lists
and intuitive reporting to track campaign effectiveness. As of
December 31, 2007, we had 164,669 email marketing
customers. In June 2007, we introduced an online survey product
that complements our email marketing product and enables small
organizations to easily create and send surveys and effectively
analyze responses. As of December 31, 2007, we had 8,270
survey customers, substantially all of which are also email
marketing customers. We are committed to providing our customers
with a high level of support, which we deliver via phone, chat,
email and our website.
We provide our products on an on-demand basis through a standard
web browser. This model enables us to deploy and maintain a
secure and scalable application that is easy for our customers
to implement at compelling prices. Our email marketing customers
pay a monthly subscription fee that generally ranges between $15
per month and $150 per month based on the size of their contact
lists and, in some cases, volume of mailings. Our survey product
is similarly priced. For the year ended December 31, 2007,
the average monthly amount that we invoiced a customer for our
email marketing solution alone was approximately $33. In
addition, in 2007, our average monthly total revenue per email
marketing customer, including all sources of revenue, was
$33.63. We believe that the simplicity of on-demand deployment
combined with our affordable subscription fees and functionality
facilitate adoption of our products by our target customers
while generating significant recurring revenue. From January
2005 through December 2007, at least 97.4% of our customers in a
given month have continued to utilize our email marketing
product in the following month.
Our success is principally driven by our ability to grow our
customer base. Our email marketing customer base has steadily
increased from approximately 25,000 at the end of 2004 to over
164,000 as of December 31, 2007. We measure our customer
base as the number of email marketing customers that we bill
directly in the last month of a period. These customers include
all types of small organizations including retailers,
restaurants, day spas, law firms, consultants, non-profits,
religious organizations, alumni associations and other small
businesses and organizations. We add these customers through a
variety of sources including online advertising, channel
partnerships, regional initiatives, referrals and general brand
awareness. Our online advertising includes search engine
marketing and advertising on networks and other sites. Our
channel partnerships are contractual relationships with over
2,300 active partners who refer customers to us through links on
their websites and outbound promotions to their customers. Our
regional initiatives include local seminars and local
advertising including print, online and radio. Referral
customers come from word-of-mouth from those among our
satisfied, growing customer base and the inclusion of a link to
our website in the footer of the more than 700 million
emails currently sent by our customers each month. Finally, we
believe our general brand awareness, press and thought
leadership initiatives and visibility drive prospects to us. In
2007, our cost of customer acquisition, which we define as our
total sales and marketing expense divided by the
gross number of email marketing customers added during the year,
was approximately $255 per email marketing customer, implying
payback on a revenue basis in less than a year. This implied
payback is calculated by dividing the acquisition cost per email
marketing customer by the average monthly total revenue per
email marketing customer, which implies an eight month payback
period.
Our on-demand product was first offered commercially in 2000.
In 2007, our revenue was $50.5 million and our net loss was
$8.3 million.
On October 9, 2007, we completed our initial public
offering, in which we sold and issued 6,199,845 shares of
common stock at a price to the public of $16.00 per share. We
raised approximately $90.4 million in net proceeds after
deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other
offering costs.
Sources
of Revenue
We derive our revenue principally from subscription fees from
our email marketing customers. Our revenue is driven primarily
by the number of paying customers and the subscription fees for
our products and is not concentrated within any one customer or
group of customers. In 2007, our top 80 email marketing
customers accounted for approximately 1% of our total email
marketing revenue. We do not require our customers to commit to
a contractual term; however, our customers are required to
prepay for subscriptions on a monthly, semi-annual, or annual
basis by means of a credit card or check. Fees are recorded
initially as deferred revenue and then recognized as earned
revenue on a daily basis over the prepaid subscription period.
We also generate a small amount of revenue from professional
services which primarily consist of the creation of customized
templates for our customers. Revenue generated from professional
services accounted for less than 2% of gross revenue for each of
the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007.
Cost of
Revenue and Operating Expenses
We allocate certain overhead expenses, such as rent, utilities,
office supplies and depreciation of general office assets to
cost of revenue and operating expense categories based on
headcount. As a result, an overhead expense allocation is
reflected in cost of revenue and each operating expense category.
Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue consists
primarily of wages and benefits for software operations and
customer support personnel, credit card processing fees, and
depreciation, maintenance and hosting of our software
applications underlying our product offerings. We allocate a
portion of customer support costs relating to assisting trial
customers to sales and marketing expense.
The expenses related to our hosted software applications are
affected by the number of customers who subscribe to our
products and the complexity and redundancy of our software
applications and hosting infrastructure. We expect cost of
revenue to increase moderately as a percentage of revenue in
2008 as we expand our operations to include a second sales and
support office and a second third-party hosting facility. Over
the longer term, we anticipate that these expenses will increase
in absolute dollars as we expect to continue to increase our
number of customers over time.
Research and Development. Research and
development expenses consist primarily of wages and benefits for
product strategy and development personnel. We have focused our
research and development efforts on both improving ease of use
and functionality of our existing products as well as developing
new offerings. We primarily expense research and development
costs. The small percentage of direct development costs related
to software enhancements which add functionality are capitalized
and depreciated as a component of cost of revenue. We expect
that on an annual basis research and development expenses will
increase in absolute dollars, but decrease as a percentage of
revenue, as we continue to enhance and expand our product
offerings.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing
expenses consist primarily of advertising and promotional costs,
wages and benefits for sales and marketing personnel, partner
referral fees, and the portion of customer support costs that
relate to assisting trial customers. Advertising costs consist
primarily of
pay-per-click
payments to search engines, other online and offline advertising
media, including radio and print advertisements, as well as the
costs to create and produce these advertisements. Advertising
costs are expensed
as incurred. Promotional costs consist primarily of public
relations, memberships, and event costs. Our advertising and
promotional expenditures have historically been highest in the
fourth quarter of each year as this reflects a period of
increased sales and marketing activity for many small
organizations. In order to continue to grow our business and
brand and category awareness, we expect that we will continue to
commit substantial resources to our sales and marketing efforts.
As a result, we expect that on an annual basis sales and
marketing expense will increase in absolute dollars, but
decrease as a percentage of revenue, as we continue to grow.
General and Administrative. General and
administrative expenses consist primarily of wages and benefits
for administrative, human resources, internal information
technology support, finance and accounting personnel,
professional fees, other taxes and other corporate expenses. We
expect that general and administrative expenses will increase as
we continue to add personnel in connection with the anticipated
growth of our business and incur costs related to operating as a
public company. Therefore, we expect that our general and
administrative expenses, in total, will increase in absolute
dollars as we continue to grow and operate as a public company.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States. The preparation of our financial statements and related
disclosures requires us to make estimates, assumptions and
judgments that affect the reported amount of assets,
liabilities, revenue, costs and expenses, and related
disclosures. We believe that the estimates, assumptions and
judgments involved in the accounting policies described below
have the greatest potential impact on our financial statements
and, therefore, consider these to be our critical accounting
policies. Accordingly, we evaluate our estimates, assumptions
and judgments on an ongoing basis. Our actual results may differ
from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.
See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus for information about
these critical accounting policies, as well as a description of
our other significant accounting policies.
Revenue Recognition. We provide access to our
products through subscription arrangements whereby a customer is
charged a fee to access our products. Subscription arrangements
include use of our software and access to our customer and
support services, such as telephone support. We follow the
guidance of the SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin, or SAB,
No. 104, Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements, and Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, Issue
No. 00-03,
Application of AICPA Statement of Position
97-2 to
Arrangements that Include the Right to Use Software Stored on
Another Entity’s Hardware, which applies when customers
do not have the right to take possession of the software and use
it on another entity’s hardware. When there is evidence of
an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable and
collectibility is deemed probable, we recognize revenue on a
daily basis over the subscription period as the services are
delivered.
We also offer professional services to our customers primarily
for the design of custom email templates and training.
Professional services revenue is accounted for separately from
subscription revenue based on the guidance of
EITF 00-21,
Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple
Deliverables, as those services have value on a standalone
basis and do not involve a significant degree of risk or unique
acceptance criteria and as the fair value of our subscription
services is evidenced by their availability on a standalone
basis. Professional services revenue is recognized as the
services are performed.
Income Taxes. Income taxes are provided for
tax effects of transactions reported in the financial statements
and consist of income taxes currently due plus deferred income
taxes related to timing differences between the basis of certain
assets and liabilities for financial statements and income tax
reporting. Deferred taxes are determined based on the difference
between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and
liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in
which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation
allowance for the net deferred tax assets is provided if, based
upon the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than
not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized.
Software and Website Development Costs. We
follow the guidance of the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants Statement of Position
No. 98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed
or Obtained for Internal Use and EITF Issue
No. 00-02, Accounting for Web Site Development
Costs, in accounting for the development costs of our
on-demand products and website development costs whereby costs
to develop functionality are capitalized. The costs incurred in
the preliminary stages of development are expensed as incurred.
Once an application has reached the development stage, internal
and external costs, if direct and incremental, are capitalized
until the software is substantially complete and ready for its
intended use. Costs associated with the development of internal
use software capitalized during the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2007 were $516,000 and $382,000,
respectively. Development costs eligible for capitalization for
the year ended December 31, 2005 were not material.
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
Warrant. We account for freestanding warrants and
other similar instruments related to shares that are redeemable
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards,
or SFAS, No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial
Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and
Equity. Under SFAS No. 150, the freestanding
warrant that was related to our redeemable convertible preferred
stock was classified as a liability on the balance sheet. The
warrant was subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date
prior to its exercise in October 2007. The change in fair value
(as determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model) was
recognized as a component of other income (expense), net.
Stock-Based Compensation. Effective
January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123R, or
SFAS 123R, Share-Based Payment, a revision of
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, and related interpretations. SFAS 123R
supersedes Accounting Principles Board, or APB, Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,
and related interpretations. SFAS 123R requires all
share-based compensation to employees, including grants of
employee stock options, to be valued at fair value on the date
of grant, and to be expensed over the applicable service period.
We adopted this statement using the “Prospective”
transition method which does not result in restatement of our
previously issued financial statements and requires only new
awards or awards that are modified, repurchased or canceled
after the effective date to be accounted for under the
provisions of SFAS 123R. Prior to January 1, 2006, we
accounted for stock-based compensation arrangements according to
the provisions of APB 25 and related interpretations. Pursuant
to the income tax provisions included in SFAS 123R, we have
elected the “short cut method” of computing the
hypothetical pool of additional paid-in capital that is
available to absorb future tax benefit shortfalls.
Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the
fair value of stock-based payment awards require the use of
highly subjective estimates and assumptions, including the
estimated fair value of common stock, expected life of the
stock-based payment awards and stock price volatility.
Commencing in the fourth quarter of 2007, we used the quoted
market price of our common stock to establish fair value of the
common stock underlying the options. Because there was no public
market for our common stock prior to our initial public
offering, our board of directors determined the fair value of
our common stock taking into account our most recently available
valuation of our common stock. For the year ended
December 31, 2005, the fair value of our common stock was
estimated on an annual basis by considering a number of
objective and subjective factors, including peer group trading
multiples, the amount of preferred stock liquidation
preferences, the illiquid nature of our common stock, our small
size and lack of historical profitability. Commencing in 2006,
we began the process of quarterly contemporaneous common stock
valuations. In the first quarter of 2006, the fair value of our
common stock was estimated using the guideline public company
method. The valuation considered numerous factors, including
peer group trading multiples, the amount of preferred stock
liquidation preferences, the illiquid nature of our common
stock, our small size, lack of historical profitability,
short-term cash requirements and the redemption rights of
preferred stockholders. Beginning in the second quarter of 2006,
our quarterly common stock valuations were prepared using the
probability-weighted expected return method. Under this
methodology, the fair market value of our common stock was
estimated based upon an analysis of our future values assuming
various outcomes. The share value was based on the
probability-weighted present value of expected future investment
returns considering each of the possible outcomes available to
us as well as the rights of each share class.
During 2006 and 2007, we used the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model to value our option grants and determine the related
compensation expense. The assumptions used in calculating the
fair value in 2006 were a weighted average risk free interest
rate of 4.82%, expected term of 6.1 years, expected
volatility of 64.9%
and no expected dividends. The assumptions used in calculating
the fair value in 2007 were a weighted average risk free
interest rate of 4.23%, expected term of 6.1 years,
weighted average expected volatility of 62.1% and no expected
dividends. These assumptions represent management’s best
estimates, but the estimates involve inherent uncertainties and
the application of management judgment. As a result, if factors
change and we use significantly different assumptions or
estimates, our stock-based compensation could be materially
different. We have historically been a private company and lack
company-specific historical and implied volatility information.
Therefore, we estimate our expected volatility based on the
historical volatility of our publicly traded peer companies and
expect to continue to do so until such time as we have adequate
historical data regarding the volatility of our traded stock
price. The expected term of options has been determined
utilizing the “simplified” method as prescribed by
SAB No. 107, Share-Based Payment. The risk-free
interest rate used for each grant is based on a
U.S. Treasury instrument with a term similar to the
expected term of the option. SFAS 123R requires that we
recognize compensation expense for only the portion of options
that are expected to vest. We have estimated expected
forfeitures of stock options with the adoption of SFAS 123R
to be zero. In developing a forfeiture rate estimate, we have
considered our historical experience and determined our
forfeitures to be de minimis. If there are forfeitures of
unvested options, additional adjustments to compensation expense
may be required in future periods. We have unrecognized
compensation expense associated with outstanding stock options
at December 31, 2007 of $7.2 million, which is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
3.57 years.
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth selected statements of operations
data for each of the periods indicated as a percentage of total
revenue.
Revenue. Revenue for 2007 was
$50.5 million, an increase of $22.9 million, or 83%,
over revenue of $27.6 million for 2006. The increase in
revenue resulted primarily from an 86% increase in the number of
average monthly email marketing customers, offset by a slight
decrease in average revenue per customer. Average monthly email
marketing customers increased to 125,130 in 2007 from 67,336 in
2006, while average revenue per customer in 2007 decreased to
$33.63 from $34.10 in 2006. We expect our average revenue per
customer to increase in 2008 as we generate additional revenue
from our email marketing customers for add-ons to the email
marketing product and from our survey product.
Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue for 2007 was
$13.0 million, an increase of $5.2 million, or 67%,
over cost of revenue of $7.8 million for 2006. As a
percentage of revenue, cost of revenue decreased to 26% in 2007
from 28% in 2006. The increase in absolute dollars primarily
resulted from an 86% increase in the number of
average monthly email marketing customers, which resulted in
increased hosting and operations expense and customer support
costs. Of the increase in cost of revenue, $3.1 million
resulted from increased personnel costs attributable to
additional employees in our customer support and operations
groups to support customer growth and to increase the quality
and range of support options available to customers.
Additionally, $1.2 million resulted from increased
depreciation, hosting and maintenance costs due to scaling and
adding capacity to our hosting infrastructure, and $700,000
related to increased credit card fees due to a higher volume of
billing transactions. We expect cost of revenue to increase
modestly as a percentage of revenue in 2008 as we expand our
operations to include a second sales and support office and a
second third-party hosting facility.
Research and Development Expenses. Research
and development expenses for 2007 were $10.3 million, an
increase of $4.1 million, or 68%, over research and
development expenses of $6.2 million for 2006. The increase
was primarily due to additional personnel related costs of
$3.5 million as we increased the number of research and
development employees to further enhance our products.
Additional consulting and contractor fees of $100,000 also
contributed to the increase due to the use of these resources to
supplement our own personnel. We expect research and development
expenses to increase in absolute dollars but decrease as a
percentage of revenue.
Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and
marketing expenses for 2007 were $27.4 million, an increase
of $8.8 million, or 47%, over sales and marketing expenses
of $18.6 million for 2006. The increase was primarily due
to increased advertising and promotional expenditures of
$4.3 million as we expanded our multi-channel marketing
strategy in order to increase awareness of our brand and
products and to add new customers. Additional personnel related
costs of $2.7 million also contributed to the increase as
we added employees to accommodate the growth in sales leads and
to staff our expanded marketing efforts. We also paid $600,000
in increased partner fees as our partners generated increased
referral customers. We expect sales and marketing expenses to
increase in absolute dollars but decrease as a percentage of
revenue.
General and Administrative Expenses. General
and administrative expenses for 2007 were $5.4 million, an
increase of $2.8 million, or 108%, over general and
administrative expenses of $2.6 million for 2006. The
increase was due primarily to additional personnel related costs
of $1.2 million because we increased the number of general
and administrative employees to support our overall growth, as
well as a one-time payment of $225,000 to close out an
obligation related to a 1999 stock placement agreement. We also
incurred increased insurance and professional fees to support
the reporting and regulatory requirements of a public company.
Interest and Other Income (Expense),
Net. Interest and other income (expense), net for
2007 was $(2.6) million, an increase of $2.4 million
from interest and other income (expense), net of $(203,000) for
2006. The increase was due to a $3.3 million increase in
the expense related to the change in the fair value of the
redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant primarily offset
by a $1.0 million increase in interest income from
investments in marketable securities and cash equivalents. We
accounted for an outstanding redeemable convertible preferred
stock warrant as a liability held at fair market with changes in
value recorded as a component of other expense. In October 2007,
the preferred stock warrant was exercised and converted into
common stock at which time we recorded the final charge relating
to the change in fair value of the warrant. The increase in
interest income was primarily due to an increase in the balance
of investments and cash equivalents as a result of our initial
public offering, which was completed in the fourth quarter of
2007.
Revenue. Revenue for 2006 was
$27.6 million, an increase of $12.9 million, or 88%,
over revenue of $14.7 million for 2005. The increase in
revenue resulted primarily from a 93% increase in the number of
average monthly email marketing customers partially offset by a
slight decrease in average revenue per customer. Average monthly
email marketing customers in 2006 increased to 67,336 from
34,909 for 2005, while average revenue per customer for 2006
decreased to $34.10 from $34.99 in 2005.
Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue in 2006 was
$7.8 million, an increase of $4.1 million, or 108%,
over cost of revenue of $3.7 million in 2005. As a
percentage of total revenue, cost of revenue increased slightly
to 28%
from 26% in 2005. The increase primarily resulted from a 93%
increase in the number of average monthly email marketing
customers which resulted in increased hosting and operations
expense and customer support costs. Of the increase in cost of
revenue, $2.0 million related to increased personnel costs
attributable to additional employees in our customer support and
operations groups required to support customer growth and to
increase the quality and range of support options available to
customers. Additionally, $1.0 million resulted from
increased depreciation, hosting and maintenance costs as we
scaled and added capacity to our hosting infrastructure and
$559,000 related to increased credit card fees due to a higher
volume of billing transactions.
Research and Development Expenses. Research
and development expenses in 2006 were $6.2 million, an
increase of $2.8 million, or 84%, over research and
development expenses of $3.4 million in 2005. The increase
was primarily due to additional personnel related costs of
$2.2 million as we increased the number of research and
development employees to further enhance our products.
Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and
marketing expenses in 2006 were $18.6 million, an increase
of $11.1 million, or 149%, over sales and marketing
expenses of $7.5 million in 2005. The increase was
primarily due to increased advertising and promotional
expenditures of $7.6 million as we expanded our
multi-channel marketing strategy in order to increase awareness
of our brand and products and to add new customers. Additional
personnel related costs of $2.2 million also contributed to
the increase as we added personnel to accommodate the growth in
sales leads and to staff our expanded marketing efforts.
General and Administrative Expenses. General
and administrative expenses in 2006 were $2.6 million, an
increase of $1.3 million, or 98%, over general and
administrative expenses of $1.3 million in 2005. The
increase was primarily due to additional personnel related costs
of $811,000 as we increased the number of general and
administrative employees to support our overall growth and an
increase in legal, audit, accounting and insurance costs of
$261,000, which reflected the increased scale and complexity of
our professional service needs.
Interest and Other Income (Expense),
Net. Interest and other income (expense), net in
2006 was $(203,000), an increase of $179,000 from interest and
other income (expense), net of $(24,000) in 2005. The increase
was due to a $588,000 increase in other expense related to the
change in value of the redeemable convertible preferred stock
warrant primarily offset by a $432,000 increase in interest
income from investments in marketable securities and cash
equivalents. Interest income increased primarily due to an
increase in investments and cash equivalents as a result of an
equity funding that took place during the year.
The following table sets forth our unaudited operating results
for each of the ten quarters in the period ended
December 31, 2007. This information is derived from our
unaudited financial statements, which in the opinion of
management contain all adjustments necessary for a fair
statement of such financial data. Historical results are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in future
periods. You should read this data together with our financial
statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
Revenue increased sequentially in each of the quarters presented
primarily due to increases in the number of total customers.
Gross profit, in absolute dollars, also increased sequentially
for the quarters presented primarily due to revenue growth.
Total operating expenses, in absolute dollars, increased
sequentially for most of the quarters presented primarily due to
increased sales and marketing expenses which resulted from
increased marketing efforts and increased number of personnel.
The decrease in operating expenses for the first quarter of 2007
was due to the decrease in marketing expenses from the fourth
quarter of 2006 to the first quarter of 2007. This decrease was
the result of the seasonality of our marketing expenses, which
have been highest in the fourth quarter.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At December 31, 2007, our principal sources of liquidity
were cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities of
$102 million.
Since our inception we have financed our operations primarily
through the sale of redeemable convertible preferred stock,
issuance of convertible promissory notes, borrowings under
credit facilities and, to a lesser extent, cash flow from
operations. On October 9, 2007, we completed our initial
public offering, in which we issued and sold
6,199,845 shares of common stock at a price to the public
of $16.00 per share. We raised approximately $90.4 million
in net proceeds after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions and other offering costs. Additionally, we used
$2.6 million of proceeds to repay our outstanding principal
and interest under our term loan facility. In the future, we
anticipate that our primary sources of liquidity will be cash
generated from our operating activities.
Our operating activities provided cash of $4.3 million in
2007, used cash of $748,000 in 2006 and provided cash of
$2.4 million in 2005. Net cash inflows for the year ended
December 31, 2007 resulted primarily from our operating
losses offset by non-cash charges for depreciation and
amortization, changes in fair value of the preferred stock
warrant and
stock-based
compensation charges as well as changes in our working capital
accounts. Net cash outflows in 2006 resulted primarily from
operating losses partially offset by changes in our working
capital accounts and non-cash charges for depreciation and
amortization, changes in fair value of the warrant for
redeemable convertible preferred stock and
stock-based
compensation charges. Net cash inflows during 2005 resulted
primarily from operating losses offset by increases in current
liability accounts and non-cash charges for depreciation and
amortization. Operating losses were primarily due to increased
sales and marketing efforts and additional employees company
wide for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2007.
Changes in current assets consisted primarily of the increase in
prepaid expenses and other current assets. Prepaid expenses and
other current assets increased $1.3 million in 2007
primarily due to an increase in prepaid software and maintenance
contracts as well as increased volume of business. Prepaid
expenses and other current assets increased $255,000 in 2006
primarily due to increased volume of business. Other assets
increased in 2007 due to the prepayment of a multi-year software
agreement.
The increases in current liability accounts consisted primarily
of the following:
Changes in deferred revenue were as follows:
•
during 2007, deferred revenue increased $4.9 million from
$5.5 million to $10.4 million;
•
during 2006, deferred revenue increased $2.7 million from
$2.8 million to $5.5 million; and
•
during 2005, deferred revenue increased $1.5 million from
$1.3 million to $2.8 million.
The increases in deferred revenue were due to continued growth
in unearned prepaid subscriptions. The growth in subscriptions
was primarily due to new customer growth.
Changes in accrued expenses and other current liabilities were
as follows:
•
during 2007, accrued expenses increased $900,000 from
$2.4 million to $3.3 million primarily due to
increased employee related costs as a result of personnel
additions;
•
during 2006, accrued expenses increased $1.9 million from
$494,000 to $2.4 million primarily due to increased
marketing efforts during the year, increased employee related
costs as a result of personnel additions and increased costs
directly attributable to revenue growth partially offset by the
receipt of invoices and timing of payments; and
•
during 2005, accrued expenses increased $188,000 from $306,000
to $494,000.
Changes in accounts payable were as follows:
•
during 2007, accounts payable increased $1.3 from
$2.6 million to $3.9 million;
•
during 2006, accounts payable increased $1.1 million from
$1.5 million to $2.6 million; and
•
during 2005, accounts payable increased $1.3 million from
$176,000 to $1.5 million.
The changes in accounts payable were due to increased expense
levels, net of the impact of the timing of payments to vendors.
The following non-cash charges are added back as adjustments to
reconcile net loss to net cash provided by or used in operating
activities:
•
change in fair value of a warrant of $3.9 million and
$588,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively;
•
depreciation and amortization expense of $2.6 million,
$1.5 million and $591,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively; and
•
stock-based compensation expense of $645,000, $83,000 and
$17,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively.
The change in fair value of the warrant to purchase
Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock was due to
the increase in the value of the underlying common stock into
which this warrant was ultimately convertible. The warrant was
subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date and changes
in fair value recognized as a component of other expense until
the warrant was exercised in October 2007.
The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was due to
increased purchases of property and equipment required to
support the continued growth of the business.
The increase in
stock-based
compensation expense was due to the adoption of SFAS 123R
in January 2006 and an increase in the value of the common stock
into which these options were exercisable.
As of December 31, 2007, we had federal and state net
operating loss carry-forwards of $38 million and
$25 million, respectively, which may be available to offset
potential payments of future federal and state income tax
liabilities which expire at various dates through 2027 for
federal income tax purposes and through 2012 for state income
tax purposes.
Net cash used in investing activities was $6.0 million,
$7.7 million and $2.2 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net cash
used in investing activities during the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 consisted primarily of net cash
paid to purchase marketable securities and property and
equipment, partially offset by proceeds from maturities of
marketable securities in 2007. Net cash used in investing
activities during the year ended December 31, 2005
consisted primarily of cash paid for the purchase of property
and equipment. Property and equipment purchases consist of
infrastructure for our products, capitalization of certain
software development costs, computer equipment for our employees
and equipment and leasehold improvements primarily related to
additional office space.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $90.0 million
for 2007. Net cash provided by financing activities was
$14.4 million and $512,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net cash provided
by financing activities for 2007 consisted primarily of cash
proceeds from our initial public offering in which we raised
approximately $90.4 million after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and other offering costs. We also
received proceeds of $2.8 million from additional
borrowings under the term loan facility and repaid $900,000 of
borrowings during the first nine months of 2007. After our
initial public offering, we used proceeds of $2.6 million
to repay the remaining outstanding borrowings. Additional cash
was provided by exercises of outstanding options and warrants in
2007. Net cash provided by financing activities for the year
ended December 31, 2006 consisted primarily of proceeds
from the issuance of our Series C redeemable convertible
preferred stock and, to a lesser extent, proceeds from the
exercise of stock options and warrants, partially offset by
repayment of outstanding borrowings under the term loan
facility. Net cash provided by financing activities for the year
ended December 31, 2005 consisted primarily of new
borrowings under the term loan facility partially offset by
repayment of the borrowings and other capital lease obligations.
Our future capital requirements may vary materially from those
now planned and will depend on many factors, including, but not
limited to, development of new products, market acceptance of
our products, the levels of advertising and promotion required
to launch additional products and improve our competitive
position in the marketplace, the expansion of our sales, support
and marketing organizations, the establishment of additional
offices in the United States and worldwide and the building of
infrastructure necessary to support our anticipated growth, the
response of competitors to our products and our relationships
with suppliers and clients. Since the introduction of our
on-demand email marketing product in 2000, we have experienced
increases in our expenditures consistent with the growth in our
operations and personnel, and we anticipate that our
expenditures will continue to increase in the future.
We opened a second
third-party
hosting facility in the first quarter of 2008 to provide
redundancy and increased scaleability for our product
infrastructure. We have made capital expenditures in 2007 and in
early 2008 and plan to make additional capital expenditures in
2008 for capital equipment to be used in this facility. We also
plan to open a second sales and support office in the second
half of 2008. We anticipate making capital commitments in 2008
and 2009 associated with the build-out and outfitting of this
office. Additionally we anticipate continuing investments in
property and equipment to support the anticipated growth in our
business. We believe that our current cash, cash equivalents and
marketable securities and operating cash flows will be
sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure
requirements for at least the next twelve months. Thereafter, we
may need to raise additional funds through public or private
financings or borrowings to develop or enhance products, to fund
expansion, to respond to competitive pressures or to acquire
complementary products, businesses or technologies. If required,
additional financing may not be available on terms that are
favorable to us, if at all. If we raise additional funds through
the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the
percentage ownership of our stockholders will be reduced and
these securities might have rights, preferences and privileges
senior to those of our current stockholders. No assurance can be
given that additional financing will be available or that, if
available, such financing can be obtained on terms favorable to
our stockholders and us.
During the last three years, inflation and changing prices have
not had a material effect on our business and we do not expect
that inflation or changing prices will materially affect our
business in the foreseeable future.
We do not engage in any off-balance sheet financing activities.
We do not have any interest in entities referred to as variable
interest entities, which include special purpose entities and
other structured finance entities.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R),
Business Combinations. SFAS 141(R) expands the
definition of a business combination and requires acquisitions
to be accounted for at fair value. These fair value provisions
will be applied to contingent consideration, in-process research
and development and acquisition contingencies. Purchase
accounting adjustments will be reflected during the period in
which an acquisition was originally recorded. Additionally, the
new standard requires transaction costs and restructuring
charges to be expensed. The guidance of SFAS 141(R) shall
be applied to the first reporting period beginning after
December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 141(R) is not
expected to have a material impact on our financial position,
results of operations, or cash flows.
On February 15, 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115 (“SFAS 159”), which
permits companies to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective
of SFAS 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing
companies with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in
reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge
accounting provisions. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007. Management is
currently evaluating the effect that SFAS 159 may have on
our financial statements taken as a whole.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”),
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This
statement does not require any new fair value measurements;
rather, it applies under other accounting pronouncements that
require or permit fair value measurements. The provisions of
SFAS 157 are effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal
years. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 which
permits delayed application of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities to fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. Management is currently evaluating the effect that
SFAS 157 may have on our financial statements taken as a
whole.
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at
December 31, 2007 and the effect such obligations are
expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future
periods.
Less than
More than
Total
1 Year
1-3 Years
3-5 Years
5 Years
(In thousands)
Operating lease obligations
$
6,024
$
2,041
$
3,983
—
—
Contractual commitments
9,302
1,756
3,490
$
3,282
$
774
Total
$
15,326
$
3,797
$
7,473
$
3,282
$
774
Changes
in Accountants
On or about September 20, 2006, we dismissed Vitale,
Caturano & Company Ltd., or Vitale, as our independent
registered public accounting firm. Our audit committee
participated in and approved the decision to change our
independent registered public accounting firm. The reports of
Vitale on the financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2005 contained no adverse opinion or
disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to
uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle. During the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005 and through
September 20, 2006, there were no disagreements with Vitale
on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial
statement disclosure, or auditing scope or
procedure, which disagreements if not resolved to the
satisfaction of Vitale would have caused them to make reference
thereto in their reports on the financial statements for such
years. We requested that Vitale furnish us with a letter
addressed to the SEC stating whether or not it agrees with the
above statements. A copy of such letter, dated July 6,2007, was previously filed as an exhibit to our registration
statement in connection with our initial public offering.
We engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our new independent
registered public accounting firm as of December 26, 2006.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. We bill our customers in
U.S. dollars and receive payment predominantly in
U.S. dollars. Accordingly, our results of operations and
cash flows are not subject to fluctuations due to changes in
foreign currency exchange rates.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. Interest income and expense
are sensitive to changes in the general level of
U.S. interest rates. However, based on the nature and
current level of our marketable securities, which are primarily
short-term investment grade and government securities, and our
notes payable, we believe that there is no material risk of
exposure.
Constant Contact is a leading provider of on-demand email
marketing and online survey solutions for small organizations,
including small businesses, associations and non-profits. As of
December 31, 2007, we had over 164,000
e-mail
marketing customers and over 8,000 survey customers,
substantially all of which were also
e-mail
marketing customers. Our customers use our email marketing
product to more effectively and efficiently create, send and
track professional and affordable permission-based email
marketing campaigns. With these campaigns, our customers can
build stronger relationships with their customers, clients and
members, increase sales and expand membership. Our email
marketing product incorporates a wide range of customizable
templates to assist in campaign creation, user-friendly tools to
import and manage contact lists and intuitive reporting to track
campaign effectiveness. In June 2007, we introduced an online
survey product that complements our email marketing product and
enables small organizations to easily create and send surveys
and effectively analyze responses. We are committed to providing
our customers with a high level of support, which we deliver via
phone, chat, email and our website.
We provide our products on an on-demand basis through a standard
web browser. This model enables us to deploy and maintain a
secure and scalable application that is easy for our customers
to implement at compelling prices. Our email marketing customers
pay a monthly subscription fee that generally ranges between $15
per month and $150 per month based on the size of their contact
lists and, in some cases, volume of mailings. Our survey product
is similarly priced. For the year ended December 31, 2007,
the average monthly amount that we invoiced a customer for our
email marketing solution alone was approximately $33. In
addition, in 2007, our average monthly total revenue per email
marketing customer, including all sources of revenue, was
$33.63. We believe that the simplicity of on-demand deployment
combined with our affordable subscription fees and functionality
facilitate adoption of our products by our target customers
while generating significant recurring revenue. Since the first
quarter of 2002, we have achieved 24 consecutive quarters of
growth in customers and revenue.
Our email marketing customer base has grown steadily from
approximately 25,000 at the end of 2004 to over 164,000 as of
December 31, 2007. These customers include all types of
small organizations, including retailers, restaurants, day spas,
law firms, consultants, non-profits, religious organizations,
alumni associations and other small businesses and
organizations. Customers in more than 110 countries and
territories currently use our email marketing product. We
estimate that approximately two-thirds of our customers have
fewer than ten employees and in 2007, our top 80 email marketing
customers accounted for approximately 1% of our total email
marketing revenue. Our customers have displayed a high degree of
loyalty. From January 2005 through December 2007, at least 97.4%
of our customers in a given month have continued to utilize our
email marketing product in the following month.
We acquire our customers through a variety of sources including
online advertising, channel partnerships, regional initiatives,
referrals and general brand awareness. Our online advertising
includes search engine marketing and advertising on networks and
other sites. Our channel partnerships are contractual
relationships with over 2,300 active partners, which include
national small business service providers such as Network
Solutions, LLC, American Express Company and Career Builder, LLC
as well as local small business service providers, such as web
developers and marketing agencies, who refer customers to us
through links on their websites and outbound promotions to their
customers. Our regional initiatives include local seminars and
local advertising including print, online and radio. Referral
customers come from word-of-mouth from those among our
satisfied, growing customer base and the inclusion of a link to
our website in the footer of the more than 700 million
emails currently sent by our customers each month. Finally, we
believe our general brand awareness, press and thought
leadership initiatives and visibility drive prospects to us.
During 2007, approximately 33% of our new email marketing
customers were generated through our online marketing efforts
and approximately 14% of our new email marketing customers were
generated through our channel partners. We believe the remaining
53% came from the combination of regional initiatives, referrals
and general brand awareness.
Organizations are increasingly turning to email marketing as a
means to communicate with their customers, clients and members.
Key benefits that drive adoption of email marketing include the
following:
•
Targeted. Email marketing enables organizations to tailor
messages to specific audiences and enables recipients to respond
through links to websites.
•
Timely. The cycle from concept through design and
execution for email marketing is much shorter than direct mail
because there is no need to print and mail. Reducing cycle time
allows organizations to rapidly respond to market conditions and
opportunities.
•
Efficient. Email marketing combines low cost with
measurable responses leading to an attractive return on
investment.
Constant
Contact Market Opportunity
We believe email marketing is an excellent fit for small
organizations. Small businesses and non-profits tend to rely
heavily on repeat sales and referrals to grow their businesses
and expand their membership bases, and email marketing is a cost
effective way to reach these audiences.
Small organizations also represent a large market opportunity.
The U.S. Small Business Administration, a selling
stockholder in this offering, estimated that there were
26.8 million small businesses in the United States in 2006,
and in 2006 the National Center of Charitable Statistics
estimated that there were approximately 1.5 million
non-profits in the United States. Other small organizations that
use email marketing include online auction sellers, independent
musicians, community organizations, school districts,
parent/teacher associations and sports leagues. Based on these
estimates, we believe our email marketing product could
potentially address the needs of more than 28 million small
organizations domestically. We believe that all small
organizations could benefit by communicating regularly with
their constituents and, further, that email marketing with our
product is an effective and affordable method to facilitate this
type of communication. As of December 31, 2007, we had
customers in at least 871 of the 1,005
4-digit
standard industrial classification, or SIC, codes, which is a
method the U.S. government uses to classify industries in
the U.S.
At the same time, small organizations have generally been slower
than larger organizations to adopt email marketing as part of
their marketing mix. We believe they face unique challenges when
adopting email marketing including:
•
Unfamiliar with Email Marketing. Many small organizations
are not familiar with the benefits of email marketing and do not
understand how to effectively build a permission-based contact
list, develop an effective email marketing campaign and measure
its effectiveness.
•
Lack of Technical Expertise. Small organizations often do
not have the technical expertise to implement email marketing
software or to design and execute effective email marketing
campaigns. For example, many small organizations do not have the
marketing, graphic design or Hyper Text Markup Language, or
HTML, coding skills to develop professionally formatted emails;
may not follow or comprehend the evolving industry standards for
sending bulk email; or may not understand how spam filtering
technology may impact the delivery of their email communications.
•
Limited Budgets. Small organizations typically have small
marketing budgets. They generally cannot afford to hire in-house
staff or engage an outside marketing agency to develop, execute
and evaluate an email marketing campaign.
We also believe most existing alternatives for email marketing
are poorly suited to meet the needs of small organizations. Some
of these existing alternatives include:
•
General Email Applications. General email applications
and services such as Microsoft
Outlook®,
America
Online®
or Microsoft
Hotmail®
are generally designed for one-to-one emails. They do not easily
incorporate the formatting, graphics, and links necessary to
produce professional-looking email marketing campaigns. They
also limit the number of recipients per email and do not have
the reporting capabilities to allow users to evaluate the
effectiveness of their email marketing campaigns. Finally, they
do not provide regulatory compliance tools to assist the sender
in complying with anti-spam requirements.
•
Enterprise Service Providers. Enterprise service
providers, such as Epsilon Data Management LLC (a subsidiary of
Alliance Data Systems Corporation), ExactTarget, Inc., Responsys
Inc. and Silverpop Systems Inc. focus on large organizations
with sizeable marketing budgets. These providers offer
sophisticated, Internet-based marketing services and tools with
professional and customized execution and reporting at a price
and scale that is far beyond the scope of most small
organizations.
As a result, we believe there is an opportunity for an email
marketing solution tailored to the needs of small organizations.
These users seek an affordable, easy-to-use email marketing
solution with a professional appearance and reliable performance.
Our
Solution
We provide small organizations with a convenient, effective and
affordable way to communicate with their constituents via email.
Our email marketing solution delivers the following benefits to
small organizations:
•
Easy. We enable customers to easily create great looking
email marketing campaigns without prior expertise in marketing,
graphic design or HTML. Our product includes over
300 customizable templates intelligently organized to
streamline creation of a professional-looking message. We also
provide customers with tools that make it easy for them to
import, build and manage contact lists and to monitor delivery
and response. We further enhance our product with unlimited free
customer support and daily webinars covering topics ranging from
a general product tour to email marketing best practices.
•
Fast. Because our product is accessed through the web,
customers only need access to a computer and the Internet to
begin using it to create and send their first email campaign. A
customer can typically create and send their first campaign in
less than one hour. Once a customer has loaded their contact
list, created and sent their first campaign, our product becomes
even faster to use as this information is stored and can be
easily accessed for future use.
•
Affordable. We offer our email marketing product on a
subscription basis, eliminating the significant up-front license
fee associated with traditional software. Instead, we encourage
potential customers to try our product without charge for a
60-day
period. After the free trial, customers can use our product for
a subscription fee of as low as $15 per month with the amount of
the fee increasing based on the number of unique contacts or
email addresses in a customer’s contact list. We provide
discounted pricing for both prepayments and non-profits. For
2007, the average monthly amount that we invoiced a customer for
our email marketing solution alone was approximately $33. In
addition, in 2007, our average monthly total revenue per email
marketing customer, including all sources of revenue, was $33.63.
•
Effective. Our product provides our customers with an
effective way to reach their customers, clients and members.
According to data measured by ReturnPath, Inc. approximately,
98% of our customers’ emails were delivered past any spam
filters or controls to their target email inboxes in the United
States during 2007. We have made significant investments in
systems and processes to reduce the number of our
customers’ emails that are blocked as possible spam. In
addition, to help ensure that
customers’ emails are delivered, we have developed
relationships with leading Internet Service Providers, or ISPs.
•
Measurable. Our email marketing campaign reports provide
customers with information and data regarding each campaign. In
addition to receiving aggregate data on email receipt, open
rates and click-through rates per campaign, our customers can
identify on an individual basis which contacts received and
opened an email and which links in the email they clicked on. We
also provide comparable metrics for our overall customer base.
This feedback permits customers to alter the content or timing
of their campaigns to capitalize on aspects of prior campaigns
that were positively received by their constituents.
Business
Strengths
We believe that the following business strengths differentiate
us from competitors and are key to our success:
•
Focus on Small Organizations. We have maintained a
consistent and exclusive focus on small organizations, which has
enabled us to design a full customer experience tuned to their
unique needs. Through the website experience, product usability,
affordable price point and personal touch of our communications
consultants and support representatives, we work to ensure that
small organizations feel that we are committed to their success.
We have continually invested in primary research to understand
this market including usability studies, satisfaction surveys,
focus groups and other research initiatives.
•
Efficient Customer Acquisition Model. We believe that we
have developed an efficient customer acquisition model that
generates an attractive return on our sales and marketing
expenditures. We utilize a variety of marketing channels to
acquire new customers including online advertising, partner
relationships, radio advertising, online and in-person seminars
and brand awareness. A Constant Contact “Try It Free”
link is included in the footer of more than 700 million
emails currently sent by our customers each month. In 2007, our
cost of email marketing customer acquisition, which we define as
our total sales and marketing expense divided by the gross
number of email marketing customers added during the year, was
approximately $255 per email marketing customer. For 2007, our
average monthly total revenue per email marketing customer,
including all sources of revenue, was approximately $33.63,
implying payback on a revenue basis in less than one year. This
implied payback is calculated by dividing the $255 acquisition
cost per email marketing customer by the $33.63 average monthly
revenue per email marketing customer, which implies an
eight month payback period.
•
High Degree of Recurring Revenue. We benefit from a high
level of customer loyalty. From January 2005 through December
2007, at least 97.4% of customers in a given month have
continued to use our email marketing product in the following
month. We believe this represents a high level of customer
retention, particularly given the transient nature of many small
organizations. These customers provide us with a significant
base of recurring revenue and generate new customer referrals.
•
Consistent Commitment to Customer Service. We seek to
provide our customers with a high level of support in order to
encourage trials and ongoing usage of our product. We conduct
online webinars and in-person events to educate potential
customers about the benefits of email marketing. In addition,
our communications consultants seek to contact all new
U.S. and Canadian based trial customers to help them launch
an initial campaign and address any questions or concerns.
During the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2007, our
customer surveys indicated that more than 90% of our customers
who responded to our survey rated their overall experience with
Constant Contact as good, very good or excellent. As a result,
we believe we have a highly satisfied customer base.
•
Software-as-a-Service Delivery. We provide our product on
an on-demand basis, meaning that our customers can access and
use our product through a standard web browser. This enables our
customers to rapidly begin using our product with few up-front
costs and limited technical expertise. It also
enables us to serve additional customers with little incremental
expense and to deploy new applications and upgrades quickly and
efficiently to our existing customers.
Growth
Strategy
Our objective is to increase our market leadership through the
following strategies:
•
Acquire New Customers. We aggressively seek to continue
to attract new customers by promoting the Constant Contact brand
and encouraging small organizations to try our products. We
acquire new customers through multiple acquisition channels
including online advertising, partner relationships, radio
advertising online and in person seminars and other marketing
efforts as well as through referrals from existing customers and
the Constant Contact link included in the footer of customer
email campaigns. We consistently monitor the return on our
advertising spending in terms of new customers generated and
adjust our sales and marketing mix as appropriate.
•
Increase Revenue Per Customer. As of December 31,2007, we had an email marketing customer base in excess of
164,000 and a survey customer base of over 8,000, substantially
all of which were also email marketing customers. We seek to
increase revenue from each email marketing customer through
cross selling our survey product and through
add-on
services that enhance our products such as the hosting of our
customers’ images and logos on our system. In 2007, we
launched an
add-on email
archive service that enables our customers to archive their past
email campaigns and make them available to their constituents.
•
Provide Additional Products. We plan to continue to
invest in research and development to maintain our leadership
position in email marketing and to develop and provide our
customers with complementary products that are easy-to-use,
effective and affordable. We believe that we have a significant
opportunity to sell our survey product to our email marketing
customers as a means for them to better understand the needs of
their constituents. As new customers adopt our survey product,
we will also have the opportunity to cross-sell our email
marketing product.
•
Expand Internationally. We currently sell our email
marketing product to customers in over 110 countries and
territories, despite limited marketing efforts outside of the
United States. We believe that opportunities exist to more
aggressively market our products in English-speaking countries,
including Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia and New
Zealand. In addition, eventually we intend to offer our products
in different languages, which will allow us to market our
products in additional countries.
•
Pursue Complementary Acquisitions. We follow industry
developments and technology advancements and intend to evaluate
and acquire technologies or businesses to cost-effectively
enhance our products, access new customers or markets or both.
Our
Products and Services
Email
Marketing
Our email marketing product allows customers to easily create,
send and track professional-looking email campaigns. Our product
provides customers with the following features:
•
Campaign Creation Wizard. This comprehensive, easy-to-use
interface enables our customers to create and edit email
campaigns. Through intuitive controls, customers can readily
change colors, fonts, borders and backgrounds and insert images
and logos to help ensure that their emails appear polished and
professional. The wizard operates on a
“what-you-see-is-what-you-get” basis whereby a
customer can move paragraphs and blocks of content within the
draft email quickly and view the message from the perspective of
intended recipients.
Professionally Developed Templates. These pre-designed
email message forms help customers quickly create attractive and
professional campaigns. Over 300 templates provide ideas about
the kinds of emails customers can send, including newsletters,
event invitations, business letters, promotions and
announcements, and demonstrate, through the use of color and
format, the creativity and professionalism of a potential
campaign. Our advanced editing functionality enables customers
to easily modify the templates. We also provide templates
designed to appeal to specific vertical markets. For example, we
offer a restaurant template that includes a pre-formatted menu
section.
•
Contact List Management. These tools help customers build
and manage their email contact lists. Our contact list building
tools include file and spreadsheet import functionality as well
as software plug-ins to import contact lists maintained in
Microsoft’s
Outlook®
and Outlook
Express®
and Intuit’s
QuickBooks®.
We also provide HTML programming code for a “Join My
Mailing List” box that can be included on the
customer’s web site and used to gather new contacts. Our
list management tools enable a customer to target or segment
contacts for all or specific campaigns and monitor email
addresses to which previous campaigns could not be delivered. In
addition to their constituents’ names and email addresses,
several additional customizable fields are available for the
purposes of personalizing email messages. Unsubscribe requests
are automatically processed to help ensure ongoing compliance
with government regulations and email marketing best practices.
•
Email Tracking and Reporting. These features enable our
customers to review and analyze the overall effectiveness of a
campaign by tracking and reporting aggregate information
including how many emails were delivered, how many were opened,
and which links were clicked on. These features also enable our
customers to identify on an individual basis which contacts
received an email, opened an email and clicked on particular
links within the message.
•
Email Delivery Management. These tools are incorporated
throughout our email marketing product and are designed to
maintain our high deliverability rates. Some of these tools are
readily apparent to our customers, such as in-depth delivery
tracking. Others are delivered through back-office processes,
such as a spam content check and address validation. To further
improve the percentage of emails delivered, we work closely with
ISPs on spam prevention issues. We also include processes and
verifications that are designed to greatly increase compliance
with anti-spam standards.
•
Image Hosting. We enable customers to store up to five
images for free, view and edit these images and resize them as
necessary for use in their email campaigns. Up to approximately
1,200 images (25 megabytes) can be stored for an
additional $5.00 per month. By adding images to an email
message, a customer can make the campaign more compelling or
visually appealing.
•
Email Archive. We offer our customers the ability to
create a hosted version of current and past email communications
on our system and make them readily available to their
constituents through a link on a customer’s website. The
service, which is available for an additional $5.00 per
month, extends the life of an email communication and provides
our customers with an ability to showcase to online visitors the
extent and breadth of their communication efforts.
•
Security and Privacy. We protect our customers’ data
at a higher level than we believe many of our customers do
themselves. We do not use our customers’ confidential
information, including their contact lists, except to provide
our product, nor do we share, sell or rent this information. In
addition, we require that our customers adopt a privacy policy
to assist them in complying with government regulations and
email marketing best practices.
Survey
Our online survey product enables our customers to survey their
customers, clients or members and analyze the responses. By
selecting one of our customizable templates and editing or
entering their own questions, our customers can easily create a
professionally formatted survey. Similar to our email marketing
product, our survey product includes a survey creation wizard,
over 40 different preformatted and customizable survey
templates, list management capabilities and live customer
support.
By incorporating a real-time and comprehensive reporting
function our survey product enables our customers to analyze
overall survey results and specific answers submitted by
individual respondents. Our survey product includes powerful
analytic features that enable our customers to segment results
based on survey responses, easily edit filters for “slice
and dice” analysis and view the results in intuitive,
easy-to-understand graphical and detailed data formats. Results
can be exported to a Microsoft Excel file for additional
analysis. Our customers can identify the respondents associated
with filtered results and create a unique contact list of these
respondents who can then be targeted with a specific message or
follow-up
campaign. In addition, we recently launched a new online polling
feature that enables our customers to create online polls for
use on their websites. Responses to these polls can be viewed
immediately.
Customer
Support
We provide extensive free customer support to all customers. Our
communication consultants seek to contact U.S. and Canadian
based trial customers by phone to answer any questions and to
help them launch their first campaigns. Additional assistance is
available via phone, chat or email. Our customer support
employees answer approximately 1,500 calls per day with an
average wait time of less than two minutes. Our phone and chat
support team is located at our headquarters in Waltham,
Massachusetts while we outsource a portion of our email support
to a third party based in Bangalore, India. In the second half
of 2008, we plan to open a second sales and support call center
office in the western U.S. We complement our customer support
with free daily product tours offered via our website, an
archive of frequently asked questions (FAQs) and webinars that
explain the benefits of email marketing and surveys.
Our customer service and support group is responsible for
enforcing our permission and prohibited content policies. We
work closely with customers who have higher than average spam
complaint rates or bounced emails, and with customers whose
emails are flagged by our system as possibly including
prohibited content or spam, to assist them in complying with our
policies. If we cannot resolve outstanding concerns, we
terminate our agreement with the customer. From January 2005
through December 2007, involuntary terminations have averaged
less than 0.5% of our customer base each month.
As of December 31, 2007, we had 110 employees working
in customer service and support.
Professional
Services
Although the majority of our customers select the
“do-it-yourself” approach, we also offer professional
services to customers who would like their email campaigns and
surveys prepared for them. Our service offerings range from a
low-cost, getting started service to full-service email and
survey campaign creation.
Pricing
Every customer experience starts with a free
60-day
trial. The only requirement for the free trial is that the trial
customer must enter a valid email address that we verify before
they can send their initial campaign. We do not require credit
card information during the
60-day
trial. The trial is a fully-featured experience that is limited
to 100 email contacts. All of our customer support
resources are available during the free trial period. At the
conclusion of the
60-day trial
(or earlier if the customer’s contact list exceeds 100
contacts), we ask the customer to provide credit card
information in order to begin billing for their continued use of
our products.
Once a customer’s free trial experience has ended and the
customer becomes a paying customer, we price our email marketing
product based upon the number of unique email addresses in a
customer’s account. Set forth below are the first several
pricing tiers:
Number of Unique Email Addresses
Monthly Fixed Pricing
Up to 500
$
15.00
501-2,500
$
30.00
2,501-5,000
$
50.00
5,001-10,000
$
75.00
10,001-25,000
$
150.00
Customers in these pricing tiers may send an unlimited number of
emails per month. During 2007, approximately 80% of our email
marketing customers were in our two lowest pricing tiers, $15.00
and $30.00 per month. We offer additional pricing tiers for
large list customers. These large list customers are limited as
to the number of emails they can send per month for a fixed
monthly fee, with overage charges assessed on emails exceeding
the monthly limit.
Our survey product is similarly priced based on tiers of unique
email addresses with customers allowed an unlimited number of
surveys per month. However, if a customer receives survey
responses in a given month that exceed the maximum number of
email addresses permitted in their current pricing tier, they
will incur additional charges. In addition, customers may
purchase a bundle of both our email marketing and survey
products at a discount of 50% off the list price of the second
product.
We offer our premium image hosting services for $5.00 per month
for customers with less than 50,000 unique email addresses and
our email archive service for $5.00 per month. We offer
discounted rates to non-profits and for six- and twelve-month
prepayment options.
The
Constant Contact Customer Experience
We are committed to helping small organizations use the power of
email marketing to reach their constituencies. When our
customers first connect with us, they may be experienced email
marketers or, more likely, thinking about using email campaigns
for the first time. The Constant Contact customer experience is
designed to first make sure that every customer is successful in
sending their initial email campaign and then to retain
customers and generate referrals. We have designed our email
marketing product to be easy to learn and have added a wide
variety of tools designed to assist customers in using our
product.
Getting
Started
Every customer experience starts with a free
60-day
trial. The only requirement for the free trial is that the
potential customer must enter a valid email address that we
verify before they can send their initial campaign. We do not
require credit card information during the
60-day
trial. The trial is a fully-featured experience that is limited
to 100 email contacts. Immediately after signing up, the
customer receives a welcome email with helpful information on
getting started and an invitation to participate in a free
online tour, which we host daily. Within the next few days, one
of our communications consultants seeks to call U.S. and
Canadian based customers to answer questions and discuss how to
use email marketing effectively for the organization. All of our
customer support resources are available during the free trial
period. At the conclusion of the
60-day trial
(or earlier if the customer’s contact list exceeds 100
contacts), we ask the customer to provide credit card
information in order to begin billing for their continued use of
our product.
Designing
an Email Campaign
Our email campaign creation wizard guides our customers through
an intuitive workflow process to set up an email campaign. There
are more than 300 customizable templates that provide for an
assortment of different campaigns, including newsletters, event
invitations, promotions, announcements, business letters and
more. For a more targeted audience, we provide special template
packages for restaurants, associations, religious
organizations, retailers and holidays. Our product creates email
campaigns in HTML and text formats simultaneously and allows
reviewing and editing in each mode. Creation of HTML and text
emails is necessary so that recipient is able to display the
email message in the best format supported by the
recipient’s email program or device.
Our customizable templates assist the customer to define the
layout and format of an email campaign. They are designed and
tested to appear professional. Default content and intelligent
pre-population of content, such as customer name, logo, and
website links, start the customer off with a basic email
campaign. Within the template, a customer can easily:
reposition sections of the campaign using a drag and drop
interface; and
•
add additional blocks of content—articles, products and
events.
At any time, a customer can preview the email campaign (in both
HTML and text formats) and send a test version to themselves and
a small group of others for review. We also provide spell check
capability and a spam content test to identify content that
might reduce deliverability.
Uploading
and Building an Email Contact List
The next step in executing an email marketing campaign is to
build an email contact list. Our customers can upload a contact
list they have in an email program address book or manually
enter a contact list directly into our product. Customers are
given explicit and easy to follow instructions to get their
contact lists into our product. If customers do not have a
contact list or if they want to build upon an existing contact
list, they can add our “Join My Mailing List”
sign-up box
to their websites. Customers can keep their contacts in multiple
lists for targeting their campaigns. We charge customers only
for the number of unique email contacts in their account.
As a customer is adding or uploading a list, they are clearly
notified of our permission policies and educated as to the types
of lists that are acceptable under our standard terms and
conditions.
Sending
and Monitoring an Email Campaign
Once a customer designs a campaign and selects the contact list
to receive it, they may send the campaign immediately or choose
a future date and time for it to be sent automatically. When a
campaign is sent, we notify the customer by email. The customer
can then track the results of the campaign, including how many
of the emails were delivered, how many recipients opened the
email and which links in the email were clicked. In the case of
undeliverable emails, the customer can review why the email was
not delivered and take appropriate steps. Finally, the customer
can monitor if any recipients unsubscribed from their mailing
list.
Once a customer has sent their first email campaign, our product
becomes even easier to use because prior campaigns are available
as a starting point for use in future campaigns.
Paying
for Constant Contact
Once the free trial is over (after 60 days or earlier if
the trial customer enters more than 100 email contacts), trial
customers are prompted to enter credit card information and pick
a payment plan in order to continue to use our email marketing
product. Customers can pay month-to-month, or pre-pay 6 or
12 months to receive a discount of 10% or 15%,
respectively. Customers may also choose and pay for add-on
services, such as our premium image hosting and email archive.
Customers may pay by check if they prepay for 6 or
12 months. If
a customer is not ready to sign up for a payment plan after the
trial period, they may continue to use their account after the
trial period to build their contact list; however, they cannot
send another email campaign until they select a payment plan.
Customer
Service Experience
We are committed to providing a high level of customer service.
We offer phone, chat and email support for customers from
9 AM to 9 PM (eastern time) weekdays and email-only
support on weekends. We also have an extensive self-service
knowledgebase located on our website. The majority of our
customers use our toll-free phone number as their preferred
support channel. Our goal is to have a live support
representative on the phone with the customer in less than 2
minutes, a target we generally achieve. Our customer support
representatives are well-trained, knowledgeable and committed to
helping our customers.
Customers that want additional assistance in getting started or
designing a unique email template can utilize our professional
services team for an incremental fee.
In 2006, we launched an online community for both trial and
paying customers where they can share their experiences and ask
questions of other customers. As of December 31, 2007, we
had in excess of 14,500 members of the community with
numerous forums that include “members networking with
members” and “dos and don’ts for email
marketing.”
We offer our customers a variety of ongoing forums to learn more
about the benefits of email marketing and Constant Contact. We
offer training seminars both online and in-person within eight
geographic regions across the United States and distribute a
monthly Email Marketing Hints & Tips newsletter.
Customers
We have maintained a consistent and exclusive focus on small
organizations. In this market, as of December 31, 2007, we
served a large and diverse group of over 164,000 email marketing
customers and over 8,000 survey customers, substantially all of
which were also email marketing customers. This customer base is
primarily comprised of business-to-business users,
business-to-consumer users and non-profits and associations. We
serve a wide range of business-to-business customers including
law firms, accountants, marketing and public relations firms,
recruiters and independent consultants. They typically use our
product to illustrate their subject matter knowledge by
communicating their recent activities and to educate their
audiences by sending informational newsletters and announcements
about their company or industry. We also serve a diverse base of
business-to-consumer customers including on- and off-line
retailers, restaurants, realtors, travel and tourism businesses
and day spas. These customers typically use our product to
promote their offerings with the goal of generating regular,
repeat business from their customers and prospects. Finally, we
serve a variety of non-profits and associations, including
religious organizations, charities, trade associations, alumni
associations, and other non-profits. They typically use our
product to maintain regular communications with their members
and inform them about news and events pertaining to their
groups, as well as to drive event attendance, volunteer
participation and fundraising efforts.
We estimate that approximately two-thirds of our customers have
fewer than ten employees. For the year ended December 31,2007, the average monthly amount that we invoiced a customer for
our email marketing solution alone was approximately $33. In
addition, in 2007, our average monthly total revenue per email
marketing customer, including email marketing revenue, image
hosting revenue, email archive revenue, survey revenue and
professional services revenue, was $33.63. We have low customer
concentration as our top 80 customers in email marketing revenue
in 2007 accounted for approximately 1% of our total email
marketing revenue.
We measure customer satisfaction on a monthly basis by surveying
our customers. Based on these surveys, we believe that our
overall customer satisfaction is strong. Another indication of
our strong customer satisfaction is our low attrition rate. From
January 2005 through December 2007, at least 97.4% of our
customers in a given month have continued to utilize our email
marketing product in the following month.
Our sales and marketing efforts are designed to attract
potential customers to our website, to enroll them in a free
trial, to convert them to paying customers and to retain them as
ongoing paying customers. We believe there are significant
opportunities to increase the number of customers who try our
products through additional sales and marketing initiatives. We
employ sophisticated strategies to acquire our customers by
using a variety of sources including online advertising, channel
partnerships, regional initiatives, referrals and general brand
awareness. We also invest in public relations and thought
leadership in an effort to build our overall brand and
visibility. We are constantly seeking new methods to reach and
convert more customers.
Customer
Acquisition Sources
Online Advertising. We advertise online through
pay-per-click
spending with search engines (including Google and Yahoo!) and
banner advertising with online advertising networks and other
websites likely to be frequented by small organizations. We are
able to identify customers generated through these efforts
because they click on our advertisements before visiting our
site, and we measure effectiveness based on the number of
customers acquired. Approximately 33% of our new email marketing
customers in 2007 were generated from online advertising.
Channel Partners. We have contractual relationships with
over 2,300 active online channel partners who refer
customers to us through links on their websites and outbound
promotions to their customers. These channel partners include
large companies with broad reach including Network Solutions,
LLC, American Express Company and Career Builder, LLC, smaller
companies with narrow reach but high influence such as web
designers and marketing agencies, and large and small franchise
organizations. Most of our channel partners either share a
percentage of the cash received by us or receive a one-time
referral fee. A website design and hosting company, Website
Pros, Inc., bundles our services and provides them directly to
its customers. This channel partner pays us monthly royalties,
which contributed less than one percent of our total revenue
during 2007. Approximately 14% of our new email marketing
customers in 2007 were generated from our channel partners.
Offline Advertising. We advertise offline in
print and radio. Our radio advertising is designed to build
awareness of the Constant Contact brand and drive market
awareness. Our print advertising is comprised of advertisements
in national publications such as Entrepreneur as well as
local business publications in our geographically targeted metro
regions. Our geographically targeted offline advertising
supports our local evangelism efforts.
Word-of-Mouth Referrals. We frequently hear from new
customers that they heard about us from a current customer. In
our regular customer surveys, we ask our customers how likely
they are to refer Constant Contact to a friend or colleague.
Throughout 2006 and 2007, at least 44% or more of our email
marketing customers responding to this question gave us a 10 on
a 10 point scale. We also offer our paying customers a referral
incentive consisting of a $30 credit for them and for the
customer they referred. Even though we offer this incentive, the
majority of referral customers do not use the incentive program.
Footer Click-Throughs. Customers also come to us by
clicking on the Constant Contact link included in the footer of
more than 700 million emails currently sent by our
customers each month. In 2007, approximately 8% of our new email
marketing customers came from a footer click-through.
Sales
Efforts
Communications Consultants. We employed a team of 37
phone-based sales professionals as of December 31, 2007 who
seek to call U.S. and Canadian based trial customers to
assist them in their initial use of Constant Contact and
encourage conversion.
Local Evangelism. As of December 31, 2007, we
employed a team of nine regional development directors who are
focused on educating small organizations as to the benefits of
email marketing in their local markets.
These employees are located across the United States and
typically provide free local seminars to chambers of commerce
and other small business groups about email marketing, survey
and related topics.
Distance Learning. We offer free online webinars to
prospects and customers on a wide variety of topics designed to
educate them about the benefits of email marketing and survey,
teach them how to be great email marketers and guide them in the
use of our products.
Other
Marketing Initiatives
Press Relations and Thought Leadership. We leverage our
broad customer base as a survey panel to assess small business
expectations around major press cycles such as Mother’s
Day, Valentine’s Day and the December holiday season. We
publish the results and seek to get print and radio coverage of
our results. We also publish email marketing best practices and
advice through our Email Marketing Hints & Tips
newsletter and a monthly column in Entrepreneur.com. These
efforts enhance our brand awareness and industry leadership.
Website Marketing. We continuously measure both website
visitor-to-trial conversion and trial-to-paying conversion. We
test messaging, graphics and layout alternatives in order to
improve website conversion. We also seek to customize the
website with vertical or usage-specific messaging whenever
possible. We carefully analyze trial customer usage to
understand and overcome barriers to conversion.
Vertical Marketing. We specifically develop marketing
programs and target public relations efforts at vertical markets
for certain markets that have demonstrated an affinity for our
products. These programs focus on a number of different vertical
markets and have targeted restaurants, food service firms,
franchises, real estate, religious organizations, retail and
travel and tourism firms. We continue to adjust our target
vertical markets based on our existing customer base, market
opportunity and overall value to our business.
Community. We maintain an online user community for both
trial and paying customers with discussion boards, a resource
center, member spotlights and other features. As of
December 31, 2007, we had in excess of 14,500 members of
the community.
In the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 we
spent $7.5 million, $18.6 million and
$27.4 million, respectively, on sales and marketing. Our
cost of customer acquisition during the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2007 was approximately $305 and $255,
respectively, per email marketing customer, defined as our total
annual sales and marketing expense divided by the gross number
of email marketing customers added during the year.
Technology
Our on-demand products use a central application and a single
software code base with unique accounts for each customer. As a
result, we are able to spread the cost of providing our products
across our entire customer base. In addition, because we have
one central application, we believe we can scale our business
faster than traditional software vendors. Scalability is
achieved through advanced use of application partitioning to
allow for horizontal scaling across multiple sets of
applications. This enables individual application subsystems to
scale independently as required by volume and usage.
Our system hardware is co-located in two hosting facilities. The
first, located in Somerville, Massachusetts, is owned and
operated by Internap Network Services Corporation under an
agreement that expires in October 2009. The second, located in
Bedford, Massachusetts, is owned and operated by Sentinel
Properties-Bedford, LLC under an agreement that expires in
December 2013. Both facilities provide around-the-clock security
personnel, video surveillance and biometric access screening,
and are serviced by onsite electrical generators, fire detection
and suppression systems. Both facilities also have multiple
Tier 1 interconnects to the Internet.
We own all of the hardware deployed in support of our platform.
We continuously monitor the performance and availability of our
products. We have a highly available, scalable infrastructure
that utilizes load-balanced web server pools, redundant
interconnected network switches and firewalls, replicated
databases, and fault-
tolerant storage devices. Production data is backed up on a
daily basis and stored in multiple locations to ensure
transactional integrity and restoration capability.
Changes to our production environment are tracked and managed
through a formal maintenance request process. Production
baseline changes are handled much the same as software product
releases and are first tested on a quality system, then verified
in the staging environment, and finally deployed to the
production system.
Research
and Development
We have made substantial investments in research and
development, and expect to continue to do so as a part of our
strategy to continually improve the ease of use of our existing
products as well as develop new offerings. As of
December 31, 2007, we had 107 employees working in
engineering and product strategy. Our product management and
strategy team, which directs our research and development
efforts, includes a market analyst, product managers, and
website and user interface designers. This group also performs
competitive and market analysis as well as systematic product
usability testing. Our research and development expense totaled
$3.4 million for 2005, $6.2 million for 2006 and
$10.3 million for 2007.
Competition
The market for email marketing vendors is fragmented,
competitive and evolving. We believe the following are the
principal competitive factors in the email marketing market:
•
product functionality, performance and reliability;
•
integrated solutions;
•
customer support and education;
•
deliverability rates;
•
product scalability;
•
ease of use; and
•
cost.
The email marketing market is divided into two
segments—vendors who are focused on the small to medium
size business, or SMB, market and vendors who are focused on the
enterprise market. We primarily compete with vendors focused on
the SMB market and, based on customer count, we are a market
leader. Some of the vendors who are focused on the SMB market,
together with the customer counts of such vendors as most
recently made available by such vendors, include: Vertical
Response, Inc. (more than 36,000 customers), Broadwick
Corporation (iContact, formerly Intellicontact) (more than
21,000 customers), CoolerEmail, Inc. (10,000 customers),
Got Corporation (Campaigner) (more than 10,000 customers), Emma,
Inc. (10,000 customers), Lyris Technologies, Inc. (more than
5,000 customers) and Topica Inc. (4,000 customers). These
vendors typically charge a low monthly entry fee or a low fee
per number of emails sent.
Vendors that are focused on the enterprise market include Acxiom
Digital (a division of Acxiom Corporation), Alterian Inc.,
Epsilon Data Management LLC (a subsidiary of Alliance Data
Systems Corporation), ExactTarget, Inc., Responsys Inc.,
Silverpop Systems Inc. and CheetahMail, Inc. (a subsidiary of
Experian Group Limited). We believe enterprise email marketing
vendors charge their customers $25,000 or more per month
and provide a full-service model, which generally includes an
account executive and creative team who often assist with
content development. While we currently do not generally compete
with vendors focusing on enterprise customers, we may face
competition from them in the future.
We may also face future competition in the email marketing
market from new companies entering our market, which may include
large, established companies, such as Microsoft Corporation,
Google Inc. or Yahoo! Inc. Barriers to entry into our market are
relatively low, which allows new entrants to enter the market
without significant impediments and large, established companies
to develop their own competitive products or acquire or
establish cooperative relationships with our competitors.
In addition, these companies may have significantly greater
financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do
and may be able to devote greater resources to the development,
promotion, sale and support of their products. These potential
competitors may be in a stronger position to respond quickly to
new technologies and may be able to undertake more extensive
marketing campaigns. These competitors may have more extensive
customer bases and broader customer relationships than we do. In
addition, these competitors may have longer operating histories
and greater name recognition than we do. Moreover, if one or
more of our competitors were to merge or partner with another of
our competitors or a new market entrant, the change in
competitive landscape could adversely affect our ability to
compete effectively.
Our survey product competes with similar offerings by Zoomerang
(a division of Market Tools, Inc.) and Surveymonkey.com
Corporation.
Government
Regulation
The Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and
Marketing Act of 2003, or CAN-SPAM Act, establishes requirements
for commercial email and specifies penalties for commercial
email that violates the Act. In addition, the CAN-SPAM Act gives
consumers the right to require emailers to stop sending them
commercial email.
The CAN-SPAM Act, which became effective January 1, 2004,
covers email sent for the primary purpose of advertising or
promoting a commercial product, service, or Internet web site.
The Federal Trade Commission, a federal consumer protection
agency, is primarily responsible for enforcing the CAN-SPAM Act,
and the Department of Justice, other federal agencies, State
Attorneys General, and ISPs also have authority to enforce
certain of its provisions.
The CAN-SPAM Act’s main provisions include:
•
prohibiting false or misleading email header information;
•
prohibiting the use of deceptive subject lines;
•
ensuring that recipients may, for at least 30 days after an
email is sent, opt out of receiving future commercial email
messages from the sender, with the opt-out effective within
10 days of the request;
•
requiring that commercial email be identified as a solicitation
or advertisement unless the recipient affirmatively permitted
the message; and
•
requiring that the sender include a valid postal address in the
email message.
The CAN-SPAM Act also prohibits unlawful acquisition of email
addresses, such as through directory harvesting, and
transmission of commercial emails by unauthorized means, such as
through relaying messages with the intent to deceive recipients
as to the origin of such messages.
Violations of the CAN-SPAM Act’s provisions can result in
criminal and civil penalties, including statutory penalties that
can be based in part upon the number of emails sent, with
enhanced penalties for commercial emailers who harvest email
addresses, use dictionary attack patterns to generate email
addresses,
and/or relay
emails through a network without permission.
The CAN-SPAM Act acknowledges that the Internet offers unique
opportunities for the development and growth of frictionless
commerce, and the CAN-SPAM Act was passed, in part, to enhance
the likelihood that wanted commercial email messages would be
received. We believe we are a leader in developing policies and
practices affecting our industry and that our permission-based
email marketing model and our anti-spam policy are compatible
with current CAN-SPAM Act regulatory requirements. We are a
founding member of the Email Sender and Provider Coalition, or
ESPC
(http://www.espcoalition.org),
a cooperative industry organization founded to develop and
implement industry-wide improvements in spam protection and
solutions to prevent inadvertent blocking of legitimate
commercial email. We maintain high standards that apply to all
of our customers, including non-profits and political
organizations, whether or not they are covered by the CAN-SPAM
Act.
The CAN-SPAM Act preempts, or blocks, most state restrictions
specific to email, except for rules against falsity or deception
in commercial email, fraud and computer crime. The scope of
these exceptions, however, is not settled, and some states have
adopted email regulations that, if upheld, could impose
liabilities and compliance burdens in addition to those imposed
by the CAN-SPAM Act.
Moreover, some foreign countries, including the countries of the
European Union, have regulated the distribution of commercial
email and the online collection and disclosure of personal
information. Foreign governments may attempt to apply their laws
extraterritorially or through treaties or other arrangements
with U.S. governmental entities.
Our customers may be subject to the requirements of the CAN-SPAM
Act, and/or
other applicable state or foreign laws and regulations affecting
email marketing. If our customers’ email campaigns are
alleged to violate applicable email laws or regulations and we
are deemed to be responsible for such violations, or if we were
deemed to be directly subject to and in violation of these
requirements, we could be exposed to liability.
Our standard terms and conditions require our customers to
comply with laws and regulations applicable to their email
marketing campaigns and to implement any required regulatory
safeguards. We take additional steps to facilitate our
customers’ compliance with the CAN-SPAM Act, including the
following:
•
new customers signing up for our services must agree that they
will send email through our service only to persons who have
given their permission;
•
when an email contact list is uploaded, the customer must
certify that it has permission to email each of the addressees;
•
when an individual indicates that they want to be added to a
mailing list, they may receive a confirmation email and may be
required to confirm their intent to be added to the contact
list, through a process called double opt-in;
•
we electronically inspect all of our customers’ email
contact lists to check for spam traps, dictionary attack
patterns and lists that fail to meet our permission standards;
and
•
for customers with large email address lists, we conduct list
review interviews to verify that the list is properly acquired
and permission-based and that the proposed messages meet our
content standards. Initial campaigns using such lists are
conducted in stages, so that we can terminate the campaign early
if the list generates an unusually high number of complaints.
Intellectual
Property
Our intellectual property rights are important to our business.
We rely on a combination of copyright, trade secret, trademark,
patent and other rights in the United States and other
jurisdictions, as well as confidentiality procedures and
contractual provisions to protect our proprietary technology,
processes and other intellectual property. We have filed a
patent application and are in the process of filing a second
application.
Although the protection afforded by copyright, trade secret,
trademark and patent law, written agreements and common law may
provide some advantages, we believe that the following factors
help us to maintain a competitive advantage:
•
the technological skills of our research and development
personnel;
•
frequent enhancements to our products;
•
continued expansion of our proprietary content; and
•
high levels of customer service.
Others may develop products that are similar to our technology.
We enter into confidentiality and other written agreements with
our employees, consultants and partners, and through these and
other written agreements, we attempt to control access to and
distribution of our software, documentation and other
proprietary technology and other information. These
confidentiality and other written agreements, however, offer
only limited protection, and we may not be able to enforce our
rights under such agreements. Despite our efforts to protect
our proprietary rights, third parties may, in an unauthorized
manner, attempt to use, copy or otherwise obtain and market or
distribute our intellectual property rights or technology or
otherwise develop a product with the same functionality as our
product. Policing unauthorized use of our products and
intellectual property rights is difficult and nearly impossible
on a worldwide basis. Therefore, we cannot be certain that the
steps we have taken or will take in the future will prevent
misappropriations of our technology or intellectual property
rights.
We incorporate open source software into our products. Although
we monitor our use of open source software closely, the terms of
many open source licenses to which we are subject have not been
interpreted by United States or foreign courts, and there is a
risk that such licenses could be construed in a manner that
imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability
to commercialize our products. In such event or in the event
there is a significant change in the terms of open source
licenses in general, we could be required to seek licenses from
third parties in order to continue offering our products, to
re-engineer our products or to discontinue sales of our
products, or to release our software code under the terms of an
open source license, any of which could materially adversely
affect our business.
“Constant
Contact®”
is a registered trademark in the United States and in the
European Union. We also hold trademarks and service marks
identifying certain of our products or features of our products.
Employees
As of December 31, 2007, we employed a total of
318 employees. None of our employees is represented by a
labor union. We have not experienced any work stoppages and
believe that our relations with our employees are good.
Facilities
Our corporate headquarters, including our principal
administrative, marketing, technical support and research and
development departments, is located in Waltham, Massachusetts.
We lease approximately 80,000 square feet under an
agreement that expires in September, 2010. As of
December 31, 2007, all of our employees were based in this
location with the exception of 10 employees who worked out
of their homes. If we require additional space, we believe that
we will be able to obtain such space on acceptable, commercially
reasonable terms. In addition, we plan to open a second sales
and support office in the Western United States in the second
half of 2008.
Legal
Proceedings
We are not currently subject to any legal proceedings. From time
to time, we have been party to litigation matters arising in
connection with the normal course of our business, none of which
has or is expected to have a material adverse effect on us.
Our executive officers and directors and their ages and
positions as of December 31, 2007 are set forth below:
Name
Age
Position(s)
Gail F. Goodman
47
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Ellen Brezniak
49
Vice President, Product Strategy
Nancie Freitas
46
Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer
Eric S. Groves
44
Senior Vice President, Worldwide Strategy and Market Development
Thomas C. Howd
48
Senior Vice President, Customer Operations
Robert P. Nault
43
Vice President and General Counsel
Daniel A. Richards
48
Vice President, Engineering
Steven R. Wasserman
51
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Thomas Anderson(3)
45
Director
Robert P. Badavas(1)
54
Director
John Campbell(2)
60
Director
Michael T. Fitzgerald(1)(2)
55
Director
Patrick Gallagher(2)(3)
36
Director
William S. Kaiser(1)(3)
52
Director
(1)
Member of the audit committee.
(2)
Member of the compensation
committee.
(3)
Member of the nominating and
corporate governance committee.
Gail F. Goodman. Ms. Goodman has served as our
President and Chief Executive Officer since April 1999, as a
member of our board of directors since May 1999 and as Chairman
of our board of directors since November 1999. Prior to joining
us, Ms. Goodman served as Vice President, Commerce Products
Group of Open Market, a provider of Internet commerce
application software, from 1996 until 1998, as Vice President,
Marketing of Progress Software Corporation, a developer and
provider of application development tools and database software,
from 1994 until 1996, as Director of Product Management of
Dun & Bradstreet Software, a provider of enterprise
resource planning software, from 1991 until 1994 and as Manager
of Bain & Company, a business consulting firm, from
1987 until 1991. She holds a B.A. from the University of
Pennsylvania and an M.B.A. from the Amos Tuck School of
Dartmouth College.
Ellen Brezniak. Ms. Brezniak has served as Vice
President, Product Strategy since September 2006. From September
2004 until September 2006, she served as Senior Vice President
of Marketing and Product Management of GetConnected, Inc., a
provider of transaction processing platforms for enabling the
sale of digital services. From January 2001 until August 2004,
Ms. Brezniak served as Vice President of Marketing of
OutStart, Inc., an
e-learning
software company. Ms. Brezniak has also held leadership
positions at Be Free, Inc., Open Market, and Progress Software,
Inc. Ms. Brezniak holds a B.S. from Rensselaer Polytechnic
Institute.
Nancie Freitas. Ms. Freitas joined us in November
2005 and has served as Vice President and Chief Marketing
Officer since December 2006. In February 2005, Ms. Freitas
founded The Freitas Group, a direct marketing and media firm,
which she operated until joining us. From April 2000 until
January 2005, she led the direct marketing services of Carat
Business & Technology, a worldwide media agency.
Ms. Freitas has also held leadership roles at CFO Magazine,
Earthwatch Institute and Games Magazine. Ms. Freitas holds
a B.A. from the University of Massachusetts.
Eric S. Groves. Mr. Groves has served as Senior Vice
President, Worldwide Strategy and Market Development since
February 2008 and before that as Senior Vice President,
Sales and Business Development since January 2001. From October
1999 until December 2000, Mr. Groves served as Executive
Director of Worldwide Sales & Business Development of
Alta Vista Corporation, a provider of search services and
technology. Mr. Groves has also held leadership positions
at iAtlas Corp., InfoUSA Inc., MFS Communications Company,
Inc., SBC Communications Inc. and Citigroup Inc. Mr. Groves
holds a B.A. from Grinnell College and an M.B.A. from the
University of Iowa.
Thomas C. Howd. Mr. Howd has served as Senior Vice
President, Customer Operations since February 2008 and
before that as Vice President, Services since 2001. From 1999
until 2000, he served as Director, Production Engineering, of
Direct Hit Technologies Inc., a provider of search technologies
that was later acquired by Ask Jeeves, Inc. From 1998 until
1999, Mr. Howd served as Director of Support and Quality
Assurance of Workgroup Technology Corporation, a product data
management software provider. Preceding that, Mr. Howd also
held leadership positions in engineering and professional
services during his 11 year tenure at Marcam Corporation, a
provider of software applications for manufacturing.
Mr. Howd holds a B.S. from Williams College.
Robert P. Nault. Mr. Nault has served as Vice
President and General Counsel since March 2007. Prior to joining
us, Mr. Nault served as Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary of RSA Security Inc., a provider of
e-security
technology solutions, from November 2005 until November 2006
following its acquisition by EMC Corporation in September 2006.
Mr. Nault was Vice President and General Counsel of
Med-i-Bank, Inc., a provider of software and services for
electronic benefit payments from October 2004 to July 2005;
Legal Consultant and Vice President and General Counsel of ON
Technology Corporation, an enterprise software company, from
March 2001 to May 2004; and Senior Vice President and General
Counsel of The Pioneer Group, Inc., a financial services and
alternative investments company, from 1995 to 2000. Before
joining Pioneer, Mr. Nault was a member of the corporate
department of Hale and Dorr LLP (now Wilmer Cutler Pickering
Hale and Dorr LLP). Mr. Nault is a director of Vanderbilt
Financial, LLC, an institutional investment fund. Mr. Nault
holds a B.A. from the University of Rhode Island and a J.D. from
Boston University School of Law.
Daniel A. Richards. Mr. Richards joined us in 1999
and has served as Vice President, Engineering since 2000. Prior
to joining us, from 1995 to 1999, he served as a principal
developer and as Vice President Engineering of Segue Software
Inc., a software company specializing in automated testing
applications. Preceding that, Mr. Richards held a variety
of developer and leadership positions at Mercury Computer
Systems, Hewlett-Packard and Apollo Computer, Inc.
Mr. Richards holds a B.S. from the State University of New
York at Binghamton.
Steven R. Wasserman. Mr. Wasserman has served as
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since December 2005.
Prior to joining us, he served as Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Med-i-Bank, Inc., a provider of software
and services for electronic benefit payments, from March 2004
until it was acquired by Metavante Corp. in July 2005. From
January 2001 until March 2004, Mr. Wasserman served as Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of ON Technology
Corporation, an enterprise software company that was acquired by
Symantec Corporation. Preceding that, Mr. Wasserman has
held leadership positions at The Pioneer Group, GTECH Holdings
Corporation and EG&G, Inc. Mr. Wasserman holds a
B.B.A. from the University of Michigan and an M.B.A. from Babson
College.
Thomas Anderson. Mr. Anderson has served as one of
our directors since January 2007. From January 2007 until
December 2007, Mr. Anderson was the Senior Vice
President, Direct to Consumer Channel, of SLM Corporation, a
provider of student loans. From January 2005 until January 2007,
Mr. Anderson was the President, Chief Executive Officer and
a member of the board of directors of Upromise, Inc., a provider
of financial resources for college-bound individuals, which was
acquired by SLM Corporation. From January 2003 until January
2005, he served as Chief Executive Officer of AmeriFee, LLC, a
medical finance company owned by Capital One Financial
Corporation. From 2001 until 2003, he served as a Senior Vice
President of Capital One, a financial services company.
Mr. Anderson holds a B.A. from Dartmouth College and a M.S.
from the MIT Sloan School of Management.
Robert P. Badavas. Mr. Badavas has served as one of
our directors since May 2007. He is the President and Chief
Executive Officer of TAC Worldwide, a technical staffing and
workforce solutions company owned by Goodwill Group of Japan.
From November 2003 until becoming President and Chief Executive
Officer in December 2005, he was the Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of TAC Worldwide. From September
2001 to September 2003, Mr. Badavas served as Senior
Principal and Chief Operating Officer of
Atlas Venture, a venture capital firm. Mr. Badavas is a
member of the board of directors of Hercules Technology Growth
Capital, Inc., a publicly-traded specialty finance company, and
Airvana, Inc, a
publicly-traded
provider of network infrastructure products. Mr. Badavas
holds a B.S. in Accounting and Finance from Bentley College.
John Campbell. Mr. Campbell has served as one of our
directors since March 1999 and is a private investor. From
December 2005 until June 2006, he served as interim Chief
Operating Officer of DFA Capital Management Inc., a risk
management software company. He is a director of WAM Systems and
DFA Capital Management, both privately held software companies.
Mr. Campbell co-founded Marcam Corporation, a leading
developer of ERP software, in 1980.
Michael T. Fitzgerald. Mr. Fitzgerald has served as
one of our directors since July 2000. He is Managing General
Partner and Founder of Commonwealth Capital Ventures, the
manager of four early stage venture funds. Prior to founding
Commonwealth in 1995, he was a General Partner at Palmer
Partners, the manager of three early stage venture funds, where
he served since 1981. Mr. Fitzgerald is a member of the
board of directors of several private companies.
Mr. Fitzgerald holds a B.A. from Amherst College and an
M.B.A. from the Harvard Business School.
Patrick Gallagher. Mr. Gallagher has served as one
of our directors since June 2003. He is a Principal at American
Capital Strategies, Ltd., an alternative asset manager. Prior to
American Capital, he was Vice President of Morgan Stanley
Venture Partners (MSVP) and Morgan Stanley and joined the firm
in 1995. While at Morgan Stanley he also spent time in the Debt
Capital Markets Group and Technology Corporate Finance
Department. Prior to joining Morgan Stanley, Mr. Gallagher
spent two years working in Toyota’s Corporate Treasury
Department. In 2003, Mr. Gallagher rejoined MSVP after
working in various business development roles at RealNames, an
Internet services company. He holds a B.A. in Economics and
Literature from Claremont McKenna College.
William S. Kaiser. Mr. Kaiser has served as one of
our directors since May 2006. Mr. Kaiser has been employed
by Greylock Management Corporation, a venture capital firm,
since May 1986 and has been one of the general partners of the
Greylock Limited Partnerships since January 1988.
Mr. Kaiser is a member of the board of directors of Red
Hat, Inc., an open source solutions provider, and several
private companies. Mr. Kaiser holds a B.S. from MIT and an
M.B.A. from the Harvard Business School.
Board
Composition
Our board of directors currently consists of seven members, all
of whom were elected as directors pursuant to the terms of an
investor rights agreement that terminated upon the closing of
our initial public offering. There are no further contractual
obligations regarding the election of our directors and there
are no family relationships among any of our directors or
executive officers.
In accordance with the terms of our restated certificate of
incorporation and second amended and restated bylaws, our board
of directors are divided into three classes, each of which
consists, as nearly as possible, of one-third of the total
number of directors constituting our entire board of directors
and each of whose members serve for staggered three year terms.
As a result, only one class of our board of directors is elected
each year. The members of the classes are divided as follows:
•
the class I directors are Messrs. Anderson and
Fitzgerald, and their term expires at the annual meeting of
stockholders to be held in 2008;
•
the class II directors are Messrs. Campbell and
Gallagher, and their term expires at the annual meeting of
stockholders to be held in 2009; and
•
the class III directors are Ms. Goodman and
Messrs. Badavas and Kaiser, and their term expires at the
annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2010.
Our restated certificate of incorporation and second amended and
restated bylaws provide that our directors may be removed only
for cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least
two-thirds of the votes that all
of our stockholders would be entitled to cast in an annual
election of directors. Upon the expiration of the term of a
class of directors, directors in that class are eligible to be
elected for a new three-year term at the annual meeting of
stockholders in the year in which their term expires. This
classification of our board of directors may have the effect of
delaying or preventing changes in control or management of our
company.
Director
Independence
Under Rule 4350 of the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules, a majority
of a listed company’s board of directors must be comprised
of independent directors within one year of listing. In
addition, Nasdaq Marketplace Rules require that, subject to
specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s
audit, compensation and nominating and governance committees be
independent and that audit committee members also satisfy
independence criteria set forth in
Rule 10A-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the
Exchange Act. Under Rule 4200(a)(15) of the Nasdaq
Marketplace Rules, a director will only qualify as an
“independent director” if, in the opinion of that
company’s board of directors, that person does not have a
relationship that would interfere with the exercise of
independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a
director. In order to be considered to be independent for
purposes of
Rule 10A-3,
a member of an audit committee of a listed company may not,
other than in his or her capacity as a member of the audit
committee, the board of directors, or any other board committee:
(1) accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting,
advisory, or other compensatory fee from the listed company or
any of its subsidiaries; or (2) be an affiliated person of
the listed company or any of its subsidiaries.
In February 2008, our board of directors undertook a review
of the composition of our board of directors and its committees
and the independence of each director. Based upon information
requested from and provided by each director concerning their
background, employment and affiliations, including family
relationships, our board of directors has determined that none
of Messrs. Anderson, Badavas, Campbell, Fitzgerald,
Gallagher and Kaiser, or six of our seven directors, has a
relationship that would interfere with the exercise of
independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a
director and that each of these directors is
“independent” as that term is defined under
Rule 4200(a)(15) of the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules.
Our board of directors also determined that
Messrs. Badavas, Fitzgerald and Kaiser, who comprise our
audit committee, Messrs. Campbell, Fitzgerald and
Gallagher, who comprise our compensation committee, and
Messrs. Anderson, Gallagher and Kaiser, who comprise our
nominating and governance committee, satisfy the independence
standards for those committees established by applicable SEC
rules and the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules. In making this
determination, our board of directors considered the
relationships that each non-employee director has with our
company and all other facts and circumstances our board of
directors deemed relevant in determining their independence,
including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each
non-employee director. In particular, our board of directors has
determined that, although Mr. Fitzgerald falls outside the
safe harbor provisions of
Rule 10A-3(e)(1)(ii)
under the Exchange Act, Mr. Fitzgerald nevertheless meets
the independence requirements contemplated by
Rule 10A-3
under the Exchange Act. The safe harbor provisions of
Rule 10A-3(e)(1)(ii)
exempt holders of 10% or less of any class of voting securities
of an issuer from being deemed to be in control of, or an
affiliate of, that issuer. After this offering,
Mr. Fitzgerald will beneficially own approximately 11.4% of
our outstanding common stock as result of his affiliation with
entities affiliated with Commonwealth Capital Ventures. The
existence of the safe harbor set forth in
Rule 10A-3(e)(1)(ii),
however, does not create a presumption in any way that a person
exceeding the 10% threshold controls or is otherwise an
affiliate of an issuer, and our board of directors, after
considering Mr. Fitzgerald’s individual ownership in
our outstanding common stock and his service to us solely in the
capacity as a director, has determined that Mr. Fitzgerald
satisfies the audit committee membership requirements
established by the SEC and under the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules.
Board
Committees
Our board of directors has an audit committee, a compensation
committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee.
Each of these committees operates under a charter that has been
approved by our board of directors. The composition and
functioning of all of our committees comply with all applicable
requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Nasdaq
Marketplace Rules and SEC rules and regulations.
Audit
Committee
The members of our audit committee are Messrs. Badavas,
Fitzgerald and Kaiser. Our board of directors has determined
that each of the members of our audit committee satisfies the
requirements for financial literacy under the current
requirements of the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules. Mr. Badavas
is the chairman of the audit committee and is also an
“audit committee financial expert,” as defined by SEC
rules and satisfies the financial sophistication requirements of
the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules. Our audit committee assists our
board of directors in its oversight of our accounting and
financial reporting process and the audits of our financial
statements.
The audit committee’s responsibilities include:
•
appointing, retaining, approving the compensation of, and
assessing the independence of our independent registered public
accounting firm;
•
overseeing the work of our independent registered public
accounting firm, including the receipt and consideration of
reports from the firm;
•
overseeing our internal control over financial reporting,
disclosure controls and procedures and code of business conduct
and ethics;
•
establishing procedures for the receipt and retention of
accounting related complaints and concerns;
•
reviewing and discussing with management and the independent
registered public accounting firm our annual and quarterly
financial statements and related disclosures;
•
reviewing our policies and procedures for approving and
ratifying related person transactions, including our related
person transaction policy;
•
meeting independently with our independent registered public
accounting firm and management; and
•
preparing the audit committee report required by SEC rules.
All audit services to be provided to us and all non-audit
services, other than de minimus non-audit services, to be
provided to us by our independent registered public accounting
firm must be approved in advance by our audit committee.
Compensation
Committee
The members of our compensation committee are
Messrs. Campbell, Fitzgerald and Gallagher.
Mr. Campbell is the chairman of the committee. Our
compensation committee assists our board of directors in the
discharge of its responsibilities relating to the compensation
of our executive officers. The compensation committee’s
responsibilities include:
•
reviewing and approving, or making recommendations to our board
of directors with respect to, our chief executive officer’s
compensation;
•
evaluating the performance of our executive officers and
reviewing and approving, or making recommendations to the board
of directors with respect to, the compensation of our other
executive officers;
•
overseeing and administering, and making recommendations to our
board of directors with respect to, our cash and equity
incentive plans;
•
granting equity awards pursuant to authority delegated by our
board of directors;
•
reviewing, and making recommendations to our board of directors
with respect to, director compensation; and
•
preparing the compensation committee report required by SEC
rules.
The members of our nominating and corporate governance committee
are Messrs. Anderson, Gallagher and Kaiser.
Mr. Anderson is the chairman of the committee. The
nominating and corporate governance committee’s
responsibilities include:
•
recommending to our board of directors the persons to be
nominated for election as directors or to fill vacancies on our
board of directors, and to be appointed to each of the
board’s committees;
•
overseeing an annual review by our board of directors with
respect to management succession planning;
•
developing and recommending to our board of directors corporate
governance principles and guidelines; and
•
overseeing periodic evaluations of our board of directors.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of our executive officers serves, or served during the year
ended December 31, 2007, as a member of the board of directors
or compensation committee, or other committee serving an
equivalent function, of any entity that has one or more
executive officers who serve as members of our board of
directors or our compensation committee. None of the members of
our compensation committee is an officer or employee of our
company, nor have they ever been an officer or employee of our
company.
Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that
applies to all of our employees, officers and directors,
including those officers responsible for financial reporting.
The code of business conduct and ethics is available on our
website at www.constantcontact.com. Any amendments to the code,
or any waivers of its requirements, will be disclosed on our
website.
Director
Compensation
Prior to our initial public offering, none of our directors
received any compensation for service as a member of our board
of directors or board committees, other than the option grants
in connection with the initial appointments of Mr. Anderson
and Mr. Badavas to our board of directors described below.
In anticipation of our initial public offering, our board of
directors approved a compensation program effective upon the
closing of the offering, pursuant to which we pay each
non-employee director an annual retainer of $20,000 for service
as a director. Each non-employee director other than committee
chairpersons receives an additional annual fee of $5,000 for
service on the audit committee, $3,750 for service on the
compensation committee and $2,500 for service on the nominating
and corporate governance committee. The chairman of the audit
committee receives an additional annual retainer of $10,000, the
chairman of the compensation committee receives an additional
annual retainer of $7,500 and the chairman of the nominating and
corporate governance committee receives an additional annual
retainer of $5,000. We reimburse each non-employee director for
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending our
board and committee meetings.
In January 2007, in connection with his initial appointment to
our board of directors, we granted Mr. Anderson an option
to purchase 39,000 shares of our common stock, at an
exercise price of $3.05 per share, which was the fair market
value of our common stock on the date of grant as determined by
our board of directors. These options will vest over a two-year
period, with 12.5% of the shares underlying the option vesting
on the three-month anniversary of the date of grant and an
additional 12.5% of the shares underlying the option vesting
each three months thereafter, subject to
Mr. Anderson’s continued service as a director and, in
the event of a change of control of us, the vesting of these
options will accelerate in full.
In June 2007, in connection with his initial appointment to our
board of directors, we granted Mr. Badavas an option to
purchase 39,000 shares of our common stock, at an exercise
price of $6.89 per share, which was the fair market value of our
common stock on the date of grant as determined by our board of
directors. These options will vest over a two-year period, with
12.5% of the shares underlying the option vesting on the
three-month anniversary of the date of grant and an additional
12.5% of the shares underlying the option vesting each three
months thereafter, subject to Mr. Badavas’s continued
service as a director and, in the event of a change of control
of us, the vesting of these options will accelerate in full.
The following table sets forth information regarding
compensation earned by each non-employee director during the
year ended December 31, 2007:
Fees Earned or
Option Awards
Name
Paid in Cash ($)(l)
($)(2)
Total ($)
Thomas Anderson(3)
$
6,250
$
35,917
(4)
$
42,167
Robert P. Badavas(5)
$
7,500
$
24,563
(6)
$
32,063
John Campbell
$
6,875
$
–
$
6,875
Michael T. Fitzgerald
$
7,188
$
–
$
7,188
Patrick Gallagher
$
6,563
$
–
$
6,563
William S. Kaiser
$
6,875
$
–
$
6,875
Paul Schaut(7)
$
–
$
1,234
$
1,234
(1)
The non-employee director compensation program became effective
following our initial public offering in October 2007. These
fees were earned by each director in 2007 and paid in January
2008.
(2)
Valuation of these option awards is based on the dollar amount
of share based compensation recognized for financial statement
reporting purposes in 2007 computed in accordance with
SFAS 123R, excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures
related to service-based vesting conditions (which in our case
were none). We arrive at these amounts by taking the
compensation cost for these awards calculated under
SFAS 123R on the date of grant, and recognize this cost
over the period in which the director must provide services in
order to earn the award, which in the case of these awards was
two years. These amounts do not represent the actual amounts
paid to or realized by the director during 2007. The assumptions
used by us with respect to the valuation of option awards are
the same as those set forth in Note 6 to our financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
(3)
Mr. Anderson joined our board of directors in January 2007.
(4)
The compensation committee granted Mr. Anderson an option
to purchase 39,000 shares on January 18, 2007, in connection
with his initial appointment to the board of directors. The
option has an exercise price of $3.05 and vests over a two year
period. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Anderson had not
exercised this option. The grant date fair value of this option,
computed in accordance with SFAS 123R, was $75,660.
(5)
Mr. Badavas joined our board of directors in May 2007.
(6)
The compensation committee granted Mr. Badavas an option to
purchase 39,000 shares on June 5, 2007, in connection with his
initial appointment to the board of directors. The option has an
exercise price of $6.89 and vests over a two year period. As of
December 31, 2007, Mr. Badavas had not exercised this
option. The grant date fair value of this option, computed in
accordance with SFAS 123R, was $168,480.
(7)
Mr. Schaut resigned from our board of directors in May 2007.
As of December 31, 2007, other than Ms. Goodman, the
only members of our board of directors that held outstanding
stock options were Mr. Anderson and Mr. Badavas, each
of whom held an option to purchase 39,000 shares of common
stock.
In addition, pursuant to our 2007 stock incentive plan each
non-employee director receives an option to purchase
25,000 shares of our common stock upon his or her initial
appointment to our board of directors. Each non-employee
director will also receive an annual option grant to purchase
10,000 shares of our common stock at each annual meeting
after which he or she continues to serve as a director, provided
each such non-employee director has served on our board of
directors for at least six months prior to such annual meeting.
All of these options will vest over a three-year period, with
33.33% of the shares underlying the option vesting on the first
anniversary of the date of grant, or in the case of annual
option grants one business day prior to the next annual meeting,
if earlier, and an additional 8.33% of the shares underlying the
option vesting each three months thereafter, subject to the
non-employee director’s continued service as a director.
The exercise price of these options will equal the fair market
value of our common stock on the date of grant. In the event of
a change of control of us, the vesting schedule of these options
will accelerate in full.
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis is designed to provide
an understanding of how our compensation program is developed
with respect to our named executive officers. Our named
executive officers consist of Gail F. Goodman, our president and
chief executive officer, Steven R. Wasserman, our vice president
and chief financial officer, and the other executive officers
included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 77 of
this prospectus.
We have divided this Compensation Discussion and Analysis into
sections in order to help explain:
•
the role of the compensation committee;
•
the role of the independent compensation consultant;
•
the use of competitive benchmarking data provided by our
independent compensation consultant;
•
the objectives and philosophy of our executive compensation
program; and
•
the specific components of our executive compensation program.
The Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides detailed
information on the administration and results of our executive
compensation program in 2007. In addition, there is detailed
information regarding the compensation committee’s
determination of 2008 executive compensation, which was approved
by the compensation committee in December 2007 following a
series of compensation committee meetings held during the fall
of 2007.
Role of
the Compensation Committee
The compensation committee is specifically responsible for
establishing compensation and benefits programs for the
Company’s executive officers, including Ms. Goodman
and her executive management team. The compensation committee is
comprised solely of independent directors, and its membership
currently consists of John Campbell, who serves as chairman,
Michael T. Fitzgerald and Patrick Gallagher. The members of the
compensation committee are recommended by the nominating and
corporate governance committee and elected by the board of
directors annually. For more information regarding the
compensation committee, see page 62 of this prospectus.
The compensation committee establishes the overall objectives
and philosophy of our executive compensation program, determines
the specific components of executive compensation, sets and
reviews financial performance goals, and approves incentive
payouts. With regard to Ms. Goodman’s compensation,
the compensation committee performs these functions with input
from an independent compensation consultant (discussed below),
and with regard to the other named executive officers, the
compensation committee relies on Ms. Goodman’s
recommendations as well as input from the independent
compensation consultant. In all cases, the compensation
committee has responsibility for final executive compensation
decisions.
The compensation committee strives to maintain an effective
balance between short-term and long-term business objectives,
employing its understanding of our business, the industry and
the current and likely future business environment. Accordingly,
the compensation committee endeavors to structure short-term and
long-term incentive plans that reward performance based on
achievement of different, but complementary, strategic and
financial objectives. The compensation committee believes this
balanced approach motivates management’s efforts to drive
strong outcomes in both the current and future business
environment.
In establishing individual executive compensation, the
compensation committee considers analysis and recommendations
from its independent compensation consultant, competitive
practices, the president and chief executive officer’s
recommendations (for her subordinates), established plans,
compensation trends and internal practices. Ultimately, however,
the compensation committee applies its judgment in establishing
executive compensation.
In 2007, the compensation committee held nine meetings and acted
by written consent on five occasions.
Independent
Compensation Consultant
Beginning with 2007 executive compensation determinations, the
compensation committee engaged an independent compensation
consultant, DolmatConnell & Partners, to review and
evaluate our executive compensation program and its specific
components, including total cash compensation targets, base
salaries, target bonus percentages and equity ownership.
DolmatConnell is directly accountable to the compensation
committee for the performance of its services. In its role as an
advisor to the compensation committee, a senior representative
of DolmatConnell attends meetings of the compensation committee
when requested. DolmatConnell also provides assistance to the
compensation committee on financial performance goals and advice
on rules, regulations and general compensation trends regarding
executive compensation.
In the future, we expect that our compensation committee will
continue to engage an independent compensation consulting firm
to provide advice and data regarding executive compensation.
Competitive
Compensation Benchmarking
We operate in a competitive environment. As such, the
compensation committee believes that it is important to review
the executive compensation practices of companies that are
similar in business and size to us to ensure that our executive
compensation program is competitive and assist us in meeting our
overall executive compensation objectives.
In establishing executive compensation levels for 2007, which
were established in December 2006 and prior to the time we
became a public company, the compensation committee requested
that DolmatConnell review and evaluate the elements of our
executive compensation program, including total cash
compensation targets, base salaries, target bonus percentages
and equity ownership. As part of this review and evaluation,
DolmatConnell developed a specific peer group of private and
public software and technology companies with annual revenue
less than $60 million to provide a comparative basis for
our compensation practices and established base salary, bonus
and long-term equity guidelines for our executives.
In establishing executive compensation levels for 2008, the
compensation committee again engaged DolmatConnell to provide
analysis similar to that which it provided for 2007 executive
compensation determinations. As part of this engagement,
DolmatConnell developed two comparative data sources for
analytical purposes and to ensure that comparative market data
was available for all executives. First, given that we are now a
publicly traded company, they developed a peer group comprised
solely of U.S. based publicly traded companies from the
software and services industries of similar size to our company
based on revenue and market capitalization. This peer group,
which is referred to in this Compensation Discussion and
Analysis as the Original Peer Group, included: Art Technology
Group, Inc., Chordiant Software, Inc., LivePerson, Inc.,
Marchex, Inc., Pegasystems Inc., PeopleSupport, Inc., RightNow
Technologies, Inc., S1 Corp., Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.,
Unica Corporation, Visual Sciences, Inc. and Vocus, Inc. Second,
they reviewed compensation data from a composite of credible,
published executive compensation surveys scoped appropriately
based on the size and nature of our business. At the request of
the compensation committee, DolmatConnell developed a second
peer group for comparison purposes. This second peer group,
which consisted of U.S. based publicly traded companies
primarily in the software as a service business similar in
revenue and market capitalization to our company, included:
BlackBoard, Inc., DemandTec, Inc., LivePerson, Inc., Kenexa
Corporation, Omniture, Inc., RightNow Technologies, Inc.,
Salesforce.com, Taleo Corp., VistaPrint Limited and Vocus, Inc.
The compensation committee requested that DolmatConnell create
this second peer group, which is referred to in this
Compensation Discussion and Analysis as the Second Peer Group,
because investment analysts typically compare our company’s
financial performance to the performance of companies in this
group. The compensation committee determined that the data in
the Second Peer Group was substantially similar to the data in
the Original Peer Group. In addition, the compensation committee
noted that the compensation ranges in the Original Peer Group
and Second Peer Group were higher than the compensation ranges
reflected in the 2007 benchmarking data, which resulted from the
change to a peer group consisting of only public companies.
Objectives
and Philosophy of Our Executive Compensation Program
Our compensation committee’s primary objectives with
respect to executive compensation are to:
•
attract, retain and motivate the best possible executive talent;
•
ensure executive compensation is aligned with our corporate
strategies and business objectives;
•
promote the achievement of key financial and strategic
performance measures by linking short- and long-term cash and
equity incentives to the achievement of measurable corporate
and, in some cases, individual performance goals; and
•
align the incentives of our executives with the creation of
value for our stockholders.
Our compensation committee expects to continue to implement and
maintain compensation plans to achieve these objectives. Our
compensation plans and policies currently, and we expect will
continue to, compensate executive officers with a combination of
base salary, quarterly cash incentive bonuses, equity incentive
awards and customary employee benefits. Quarterly cash incentive
bonuses are tied to key financial metrics such as average gross
monthly revenue growth, or AMRG, adjusted earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or Adjusted
EBITDA, and Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenue, or
Adjusted EBITDA Margin, and, in the case of certain of our
executive officers, the achievement of individual quarterly
performance goals. We have provided, and expect to continue
providing, a portion of our executive compensation in the form
of equity incentive awards that vest over time, which we believe
helps to retain our executives and aligns their interests with
those of our stockholders by allowing them to participate in the
longer term success of our company as reflected in stock price
appreciation. We plan to continue to implement compensation
packages for our executive officers generally in line with the
median competitive levels of comparable public companies, with
potential upside for better than planned performance.
Components
of Our Executive Compensation Program
The primary elements of our executive compensation program are:
•
base salary;
•
quarterly cash incentive bonuses;
•
equity incentive awards; and
•
benefits and other compensation.
We do not have any formal or informal policy or target for
allocating compensation between long-term and short-term
compensation, between cash and non-cash compensation or among
the different forms of non-cash compensation. Instead, our
compensation committee establishes these allocations for each
executive officer on an annual basis. Our compensation committee
establishes total cash compensation targets based primarily upon
benchmarking data as well as the performance and importance to
the company of the individual executive and internal equity
considerations among all executive officers. Our compensation
committee establishes non-cash compensation based upon
benchmarking data, the performance of the individual executive,
the executives’ equity ownership percentage and the amount
of their equity ownership that is vested equity. In the future,
we expect that our compensation committee will continue to use
benchmarking data when determining cash compensation as well as
annual equity grants to executives. We believe that the
long-term performance of our business is improved through the
grant of stock-based awards so that the interests of our
executives are aligned with the creation of value for our
stockholders.
In establishing base salaries and cash incentive bonuses for our
executives, the compensation committee first establishes a total
cash compensation target for each executive. This is
accomplished by comparing the total cash compensation of the
applicable peer group in the 50th percentile to total cash
compensation of our positions that matched positions in the peer
group.
Based on this analysis for 2007 executive compensation
determinations, three of our named executive officers
(Ms. Goodman (−26%), Eric S. Groves, our Senior Vice
President, Worldwide Strategy & Market
Development, (−9%), and Mr. Wasserman (−26%)
were below the median for target total cash compensation of the
peer group for 2007. The compensation committee reviewed this
information and determined that the target total cash
compensation for the following executive officers be set as
follows: Ms. Goodman, $400,000, Mr. Groves, $280,000,
and Mr. Wasserman, $250,000. These increases represented an
increase in target total cash compensation to these executive
officers of approximately 16%. Ellen Brezniak’s target
total cash compensation for 2007 was established by the
compensation committee at the time of her hiring in September
2006 and was set slightly below the median based on the peer
group analysis. Ms. Brezniak serves as our Vice President,
Product Strategy. Robert P. Nault’s target total cash
compensation for 2007 was established by the compensation
committee at the time of his hiring in March 2007 and was set
slightly below the median based on the peer group analysis.
Mr. Nault serves as our Vice President and General Counsel.
Based on this analysis for 2008 executive compensation
determinations, all of our named executives were positioned
below the 25th percentile for total target cash
compensation for both the Original Peer Group and the Second
Peer Group. The compensation committee reviewed this information
and determined that the total target cash compensation for the
following executive officers for 2008 be set as follows:
Ms. Goodman, $525,000, Ms. Brezniak, $270,000,
Mr. Groves, $287,000, Mr. Nault, $294,000 and
Mr. Wasserman, $308,000.
Base Salaries. Base salaries are used to recognize the
experience, skills, knowledge and responsibilities required of
all our employees, including our executive officers. Base
salaries for our executives have sometimes been set in our offer
letter to the executive at the outset of employment, which is
the case with Ms. Goodman, Ms. Brezniak and
Messrs. Wasserman and Nault. None of our executives is
currently party to an employment agreement that provides for
automatic or scheduled increases in base salary. However, from
time to time in the discretion of our compensation committee,
and consistent with our incentive compensation program
objectives, base salaries for our executives, together with
other components of compensation, are evaluated for adjustment
based on an assessment of an executive’s performance and
general compensation trends in our industry.
2007
Base Salaries
In establishing base salaries for our named executive officers
for 2007, our compensation committee reviewed a number of
factors, including each named executive officer’s position
and functional role, seniority, job performance and overall
level of responsibility and the benchmarking data and other
information provided by DolmatConnell. In 2007, the base
salaries of Ms. Goodman and Mr. Wasserman were
increased by 10% and 17%, respectively, as compared to 2006. Our
compensation committee determined that Ms. Goodman had
performed well in 2006 as she continued to drive the strategy
that expanded the company’s market leadership position. Our
compensation committee determined to increase
Ms. Goodman’s base salary to $275,900, which placed
her 2% below the median base salary of the benchmarked group.
Our compensation committee determined that Mr. Wasserman
had performed well in his first year, building his organization,
raising capital on favorable terms and helping to prepare the
company, from a systems and processes perspective, for rapid
growth and a possible future initial public offering. Our
compensation committee increased Mr. Wasserman’s base
salary to $192,300, which placed him 6% below the median base
salary of the benchmarked group. Our compensation committee also
reviewed the performance of Mr. Groves. While our
compensation committee determined that Mr. Groves had
performed well in 2006, it did not increase his base salary, in
part, because his base salary was already 1% above the median
base salary of the benchmarked group. Our compensation
committee, however, increased Mr. Groves’ target
incentive percentage (as a percentage of base salary) from 30%
to 40%. The increase in Mr. Groves’ target incentive
provided Mr. Groves with cash compensation upside but only
if we achieved our financial targets. Our compensation committee
felt that this better aligned the interests of Mr. Groves
with those of our stockholders. Ms. Brezniak’s and
Mr. Nault’s base salaries were established by the
compensation committee at the time of their hiring in September
2006 and March 2007, respectively. These base salaries were
generally set slightly below the median base salary of the
relevant peer group.
In establishing base salaries for our named executive officers
for 2008, our compensation committee reviewed a number of
factors, including each named executive officer’s position
and functional role, seniority, job performance and overall
level of responsibility and the benchmarking data, including the
Original Peer Group and Second Peer Group, and other information
provided by DolmatConnell. In 2008, the base salaries of
Ms. Goodman, Ms. Brezniak, Mr. Groves,
Mr. Nault and Mr. Wasserman were increased by
approximately 27%, 8%, 3%, 5% and 14%, respectively. Our
compensation committee determined that Ms. Goodman had an
exceptional year in 2007. They noted that she continued to
successfully drive the strategy and growth of our company during
2007 while leading the team that completed our initial public
offering. As a result of this analysis, our compensation
committee determined to increase Ms. Goodman’s base
salary to $350,000, which placed her base salary 17% above the
median of the Original Peer Group and slightly above the median
of the Second Peer Group. Our compensation committee determined
that Ms. Brezniak had performed well in 2007. They noted
that she had developed a detailed product roadmap, extended the
planning horizon for product strategy and successfully helped to
implement the Agile software development methodology. As a
result of this analysis, our compensation committee determined
to increase Ms. Brezniak’s base salary to $200,000,
which placed her base salary at approximately the median for
both the Original Peer Group and the Second Peer Group. Our
compensation committee determined that Mr. Groves had
performed well in 2007. They noted that he successfully expanded
the regional development director program, reorganized the
partner program to drive growth and continued to be a
“thought leader” for the company’s strategy and
focus on small organizations. As a result of this analysis, our
compensation committee determined to increase
Mr. Groves’ base salary to $205,000, which placed his
base salary slightly above the median for the Original Peer
Group. Our compensation committee determined that
Mr. Wasserman had a very strong year. His primary
accomplishment was the completion of our initial public
offering. In addition, he continued to build the finance
organization, enhance our systems, processes and controls and
refine the financial metrics for the company, particularly as we
prepared to become a public company. As a result of this
analysis, our compensation committee increased
Mr. Wasserman’s base salary to $220,000, which placed
him slightly below the median base salary for the Original Peer
Group and 12% below the median base salary for the Second Peer
Group. Our compensation committee determined that Mr. Nault
had performed well in his first year, learning our business and
the legal issues relevant to our business and playing an
integral role in our initial public offering. Our compensation
committee increased Mr. Nault’s base salary to
$210,000, which placed him below the median of both the Original
Peer Group (−7%) and the Second Peer Group (−15%).
Cash Incentive Bonuses. Each year, including 2007 and
2008, we have established a cash incentive bonus plan for our
executives, which provides for quarterly cash incentive bonus
payments. The cash incentive bonuses are intended to compensate
for the achievement of both corporate financial targets and, in
the case of all executive officers except Ms. Goodman,
individual performance goals. The corporate financial targets
generally conform to the financial metrics contained in the
internal business plan developed by our management and reviewed
by our board of directors. Amounts payable under the cash
incentive bonus plan are calculated as a percentage of the
applicable executive’s base salary.
The compensation committee approves the corporate financial
targets, the weighting of various goals for each executive and
the formula for determining potential bonus amounts based on
achievement of those goals. The compensation committee works
with the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer
to develop corporate financial targets. Individual performance
objectives are necessarily tied to the particular area of
expertise of the executive and his or her performance in
attaining those objectives relative to external forces, internal
resources utilized and overall individual effort.
Ms. Goodman sets the individual quarterly performance
objectives. In establishing these objectives, Ms. Goodman
typically identifies areas that she believes require focus on
the part of the executive and are strategic or important to our
company as a whole. The financial targets and performance
objectives are generally designed to be difficult to fully
achieve and, as was the case in 2007, we do not expect that all
of the targets and objectives will be fully achieved in all
periods.
In 2007, the corporate financial targets were weighted 70% and
the individual performance goals were weighted 30% in the bonus
analysis, except that the corporate financial targets were
weighted 100% for Ms. Goodman. The corporate financial
targets were AMRG and Adjusted EBITDA. In 2007, 90% of the
portion of the bonus payout related to corporate financial
targets was based on the AMRG metric. Bonus payments based on
AMRG were paid based on achieving at least 80% or 90% of the
AMRG target, depending on the quarter, with accelerators for
over achievement beginning at 115% or 120%, depending on the
quarter. If actual AMRG as a percentage of target AMRG was
between the minimum threshold (80% or 90%) but less than the
point at which the accelerators were effective (115% or 120%),
the payout was equal to the percentage achievement multiplied by
the target AMRG incentive. If actual AMRG as a percentage of
target AMRG was equal to or greater than the point at which the
accelerators were effective (115% or 120%), the payout was equal
to the percentage achievement multiplied by the accelerators
(1.5x for achievement between 115% or 120% and 130% and 2.0x for
achievement above 130%) multiplied by the target AMRG incentive.
Bonus payments based on Adjusted EBITDA targets, which accounted
for 10% of the portion of the bonus payout related to corporate
financial targets, were paid out at 100% only if the target
metric was achieved. The actual AMRG targets for each quarter of
2007 were as follows: $126,000 for the first quarter of 2007,
$214,800 for the second quarter of 2007, $195,200 for the third
quarter of 2007 and $255,400 for the fourth quarter of 2007. The
actual Adjusted EBITDA quarterly targets for 2007 were as
follows: ($3,379,000) for the first quarter of 2007,
($2,075,300) for the second quarter of 2007, ($963,400) for the
third quarter of 2007 and $242,600 for the fourth quarter of
2007.
Ms. Brezniak’s individual performance goals in 2007
included continuing to make progress on customer research
initiatives and planning and scheduling from a product strategy
perspective two major product releases in the first quarter,
further developing and refining the product roadmap and
addressing matters related to website architecture in the second
quarter, continuing work on the product roadmap and future
release planning in the third quarter, planning the 2008 product
release schedule, hiring a web properties director and analyzing
the benefits of agile programming in the fourth quarter.
Mr. Groves’ individual performance goals in 2007
included establishing an enhanced methodology for measuring the
impact of our regional development directors and reviewing and
developing objectives around our strategic and partner
initiatives in the first quarter, reviewing and refining the
sales and channel partner initiatives relating to the launch of
our survey product and creating an
18-month
plan for sales and marketing in the second quarter, planning and
launching market expansion testing and implementing initiatives
to ensure the company met or beat customer quarterly acquisition
targets in the third quarter, and implementing initiatives to
ensure the company met or beat customer quarterly acquisition
targets and continuing to refine the analysis to measure the
organizational impact of our regional development directors in
the fourth quarter. Mr. Nault’s primary individual
performance goals in 2007 related to our initial public offering
and our operations as a public company after the offering.
Mr. Nault’s additional individual performance goals in
2007 included continuing to learn about the business by
developing relationships with his executive peers in the second
and third quarters, ensuring that our corporate governance
standards were in place prior to our initial public offering in
the third quarter and implementing public company controls and
processes and rolling out to our employees our employee stock
purchase plan in the fourth quarter. Mr. Wasserman’s
primary individual performance goals in 2007 related to our
initial public offering and our operations as a public company
after the offering. Mr. Wasserman’s additional
individual performance goals in 2007 included developing a
lifetime profit per customer analysis in the first quarter,
refining our expense forecasting methodology in the third
quarter and implementing public company controls and processes
and rolling out to our employees our new employee stock purchase
plan in the fourth quarter.
The target bonus awards, as a percentage of base salary, for
2007 were 45% for Ms. Goodman, 27% for Ms. Brezniak,
40% for Mr. Groves, 30% for Mr. Nault and 30% for
Mr. Wasserman. The actual target cash incentive bonuses
awarded with respect to 2007 and set forth in the Summary
Compensation Table that follows this Compensation Discussion and
Analysis were split 15%, 25%, 25% and 35% for each of the four
quarters respectively.
The performance based compensation elements for our named
executive officers for 2007 and a description of whether or not
they achieved or underachieved with respect to each element were
as follows:
2007 – First Quarter
2007 – Second Quarter
2007 – Third Quarter
2007 – Fourth Quarter
Company
Company
Company
Company
Strategic
Strategic
Strategic
Strategic
and Financial
Result for
and Financial
Result for
and Financial
Result for
and Financial
Result for
Goal
Quarter
Goal
Quarter
Goal
Quarter
Goal
Quarter
Ms. Goodman
Ms. Brezniak
Mr. Groves
Mr. Nault(1)
Mr. Wasserman
AMRG(2)
Exceeded
AMRG
Under-Achieved
AMRG
Exceeded
AMRG
Exceeded
Ms. Goodman
Ms. Brezniak
Mr. Groves
Mr. Nault(1)
Mr. Wasserman
Adjusted EBITDA
Achieved
Adjusted EBITDA
Achieved
Adjusted EBITDA
Achieved
Adjusted EBITDA
Achieved
Ms. Brezniak
Individual
Individual
Individual
Individual
Performance Goals
Achieved
Performance Goals
Under-
Achieved
Performance Goals
Achieved
Performance Goals
Achieved
Mr. Groves
Individual
Individual
Individual
Individual
Performance Goals
Achieved
Performance Goals
Achieved
Performance Goals
Under-
Achieved
Performance Goals
Achieved
Mr. Nault
Individual
Individual
Individual
Individual
Performance Goals
N/A(1)
Performance Goals
Under-
Achieved
Performance Goals
Under-
Achieved
Performance Goals
Under-
Achieved
Mr. Wasserman
Individual
Individual
Individual
Individual
Performance Goals
Achieved
Performance Goals
Achieved
Performance Goals
Achieved
Performance Goals
Under-
Achieved
(1)
Mr. Nault was not eligible for
a quarterly incentive payment in the first quarter of 2007 as he
joined our company in March 2007.
The table below reflects for each named executive officer
(i) the 2007 quarterly target incentive for each
performance based compensation element, (ii) the 2007 total
quarterly target incentives, (iii) the actual 2007
quarterly incentive payments for each performance based
compensation element based on achievement levels, and
(iv) the actual 2007 total quarterly incentive payments.
Actual
Target
Target
Target
Total
Actual
Adjusted
Actual
Total
AMRG(1)
Adjusted EBITDA
MBO(2)
Target
AMRG(1)
EBITDA
MBO(2)
Actual
Incentive
Incentive
Incentive
Incentive
Incentive
Incentive
Incentive
Incentive
Ms. Goodman
Q1 2007
$
16,754
$
1,861
$
–
$
18,615
$
18,094
$
1,861
$
–
$
19,955
Q2 2007
$
27,923
$
3,102
$
–
$
31,025
$
27,644
$
3,102
$
–
$
30,746
Q3 2007
$
27,923
$
3,102
$
–
$
31,025
$
31,832
$
3,102
$
–
$
34,934
Q4 2007
$
39,092
$
4,343
$
–
$
43,435
$
42,219
$
4,343
$
–
$
46,562
Ms. Brezniak
Q1 2007
$
4,725
$
525
$
2,250
$
7,500
$
5,103
$
525
$
2,250
$
7,878
Q2 2007
$
7,875
$
875
$
3,750
$
12,500
$
7,796
$
875
$
3,413
$
12,084
Q3 2007
$
7,875
$
875
$
3,750
$
12,500
$
8,978
$
875
$
3,750
$
13,603
Q4 2007
$
11,025
$
1,225
$
5,250
$
17,500
$
11,907
$
1,225
$
5,250
$
18,382
Mr. Groves
Q1 2007
$
7,560
$
840
$
3,600
$
12,000
$
8,165
$
840
$
3,600
$
12,605
Q2 2007
$
12,600
$
1,400
$
6,000
$
20,000
$
12,474
$
1,400
$
6,000
$
19,874
Q3 2007
$
12,600
$
1,400
$
6,000
$
20,000
$
14,364
$
1,400
$
5,940
$
21,704
Q4 2007
$
17,640
$
1,960
$
8,400
$
28,000
$
19,051
$
1,960
$
8,400
$
29,411
Mr. Nault
Q1 2007(3)
$
–
$
–
$
–
$
–
$
–
$
–
$
–
$
–
Q2 2007
$
9,450
$
1,050
$
4,500
$
15,000
$
9,356
$
1,050
$
4,118
$
14,524
Q3 2007
$
9,450
$
1,050
$
4,500
$
15,000
$
10,773
$
1,050
$
4,444
$
16,267
Q4 2007
$
13,230
$
1,470
$
6,300
$
21,000
$
14,288
$
1,470
$
6,111
$
21,869
Mr. Wasserman
Q1 2007
$
5,453
$
605
$
2,597
$
8,655
$
5,889
$
605
$
2,597
$
9,091
Q2 2007
$
9,088
$
1,009
$
4,328
$
14,425
$
8,997
$
1,009
$
4,328
$
14,334
Q3 2007
$
9,088
$
1,009
$
4,328
$
14,425
$
10,360
$
1,009
$
4,328
$
15,697
Q4 2007
$
12,723
$
1,413
$
6,059
$
20,195
$
13,741
$
1,413
$
5,877
$
21,031
(1)
AMRG = average gross monthly
revenue growth
(2)
MBOs = individual performance goals
(3)
Because Mr. Nault joined the
company in March 2007, he was not eligible for a quarterly
incentive payment in the first quarter of 2007.
In 2007, the total annual bonus payment as a percentage of the
total annual target bonus and the total annual bonus payment as
a percentage of annual salary for each named executive officer
were as follows: Ms. Goodman (107% and 48%);
Ms. Brezniak (104% and 28%); Mr. Groves (104% and
42%); Mr. Nault (103% and 26%); and Mr. Wasserman
(104% and 31%). In reviewing these results, the compensation
committee believed that these results were justified by the
strong company performance and individual performance in 2007
and the goal of using performance targets to reward over
achievement.
2008
Cash Incentive Bonuses
In December 2007, our compensation committee approved the target
bonus awards for 2008 for our named executive officers. The
target bonus awards, as a percentage of base salary, for 2008
are 50% for Ms. Goodman, 35% for Ms. Brezniak, 40% for
Mr. Groves, 40% for Mr. Nault and 40% for
Mr. Wasserman. As described above, the compensation
committee determined the target total cash compensation of each
named executive officer after reviewing and considering the
evaluation prepared by our independent compensation consultant,
DolmatConnell. Once the compensation committee established 2008
base salaries for
each named executive officer, the target bonus awards, as a
percentage of base salary, were generally set to bring each
named executive officer’s total target cash compensation to
the approved level. Target bonus awards for 2008 will be paid
out quarterly at the rate of 25% for each of the four quarters
respectively.
In 2008, corporate financial targets will be weighted 70% and
individual performance goals weighted 30% in the bonus analysis,
except that, in the case of Ms. Goodman, the corporate
financial targets are weighted 100%. The corporate financial
targets are based on AMRG and Adjusted EBITDA Margin. For all
named executive officers other than Ms. Goodman, of the
total corporate financial target bonus amount payable,
approximately 71% will be paid out based on the AMRG metric and
approximately 29% based on the Adjusted EBITDA Margin metric.
For Ms. Goodman, 70% of the entire bonus amount she is
eligible to receive is based on the quarterly AMRG metric and
the remaining 30% on the quarterly Adjusted EBITDA Margin
metric. No bonus payment will be made to any executive based on
the quarterly AMRG metric unless the quarterly AMRG we achieve
exceeds at least 85% of the target amount, in which event the
executive will be eligible to receive 50% of the bonus allocable
to the AMRG metric. In the event that this minimum quarterly
AMRG target amount is exceeded, the executive will be eligible
to receive an increase of 3.333% in the bonus allocable to the
AMRG metric for every 1% in excess of 85% of the target amount,
up to a maximum of 135% of the AMRG target amount. No bonus
payment will be made based on the quarterly Adjusted EBITDA
Margin metric unless the Adjusted EBITDA Margin we achieve
exceeds at least 95% of the target amount, in which event the
executive will be eligible to receive 95% of the bonus allocable
to Adjusted EBITDA Margin metric. In the event that this minimum
quarterly Adjusted EBITDA Margin target amount is exceeded, the
executive will be eligible to receive an increase of 1% in the
bonus allocable to Adjusted EBITDA Margin metric for every 1% by
which we exceed 95% of the target amount, up to a maximum of
105% of the Adjusted EBITDA Margin target. The compensation
committee believes that these financial targets are designed to
drive revenue growth and to ensure that we meet our Adjusted
EBITDA Margin projections while incenting executives to work
collaboratively to reinvest excess operating profit into the
business.
Equity Incentive Awards. Our equity award program is the
primary vehicle for offering long-term incentives to our
executives. Prior to our initial public offering in October
2007, our employees, including our executives, were eligible to
participate in our 1999 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan.
Following the completion of our initial public offering, we
grant to our employees, including our executives, stock-based
awards pursuant to the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan. Under the 2007
Stock Incentive Plan, our employees, including our executives,
are eligible to receive grants of stock options, restricted
stock awards, and other stock-based equity awards at the
discretion of our compensation committee. We believe that our
option program is critical to our efforts to hire and retain the
best people and to maintain a competitive advantage over our
current and future competitors.
Although we do not have any formal equity ownership guidelines
for our executives, we believe that equity grants provide our
executives with a strong link to our long-term performance,
create an ownership culture and help to align the interests of
our executives and our stockholders. In addition, we believe the
vesting feature of our equity grants furthers our goal of
executive retention because this feature provides an incentive
to our executives to remain in our employment during the vesting
period. In determining the size of equity grants to our
executives, our compensation committee considers comparative
share ownership of executives in our compensation peer group,
our company-level performance, the applicable executive’s
performance, the amount of equity previously awarded to the
executive, the vesting of such awards and the recommendations of
Ms. Goodman with respect to her executive team members. We
typically make an initial equity award of stock options or
restricted stock to new executives in connection with the start
of their employment. Grants of equity awards, including those to
executives, are approved by our compensation committee and are
granted based on the fair market value of our common stock on
the date of grant. Historically, the equity awards we have
granted to our executives have vested as to 25% of such awards
at the end of the first year and in equal quarterly installments
over the succeeding three years. This vesting schedule is
consistent with the vesting of stock options granted to other
employees.
In connection with the commencement of Mr. Nault’s
employment and based on the equity guidelines recommended by
DolmatConnell, the compensation committee granted to him an
option to purchase 110,500 shares of common stock. The
exercise price of this option was $4.12 per share, which was the
fair
market value of our common stock on the date of grant as
determined by our board of directors. In December 2007, the
compensation committee approved new equity awards for each of
our executives. In determining these equity awards for each of
the named executive officers set forth on the 2007 Grants of
Plan-Based Awards table below, our compensation committee took
into account company performance, which was very strong, the
fact that we completed our initial public offering, the
applicable executive’s performance and the equity
guidelines recommended by DolmatConnell. As a result, in
December 2007, our board of directors granted to
Ms. Goodman, Ms. Brezniak, Mr. Groves,
Mr. Nault and Mr. Wasserman options to purchase
65,000, 45,000, 30,000, 45,000 and 45,000 shares of common
stock, respectively. The exercise price of these options was
$22.27 per share, which was the closing, or last sale, price of
our shares of common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market on
December 6, 2007, the date of grant. Under a policy adopted
by the compensation committee, this price is equal to the fair
market value of our common stock on the date of grant. At the
discretion of our compensation committee, we expect to continue
to approve annually new equity awards to certain of our
employees and executives consistent with our overall incentive
compensation program objectives.
We do not currently have a program, plan or practice of
selecting grant dates for equity compensation to our executive
officers in coordination with the release of material non-public
information. The compensation committee has adopted a stock
option grant policy that applies to all stock option grants,
including grants to executives, but excluding automatic annual
grants to independent directors. The option grant policy adopted
by the compensation committee is as follows:
•
That we shall not, and shall not have any program, plan or
practice to, time or select the grant dates of any stock options
or stock-based awards in coordination with the release by us of
material non-public information.
•
That only the compensation committee, in its sole discretion,
shall be permitted to grant stock options and stock-based awards
under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.
•
That all grants of stock options and stock-based awards under
the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, including grants to new hires,
shall be made during the first business week of the third month
of the calendar quarter.
•
That the exercise price of all stock options and stock-based
awards shall equal the closing, or last sale, price of our
common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market on the grant date.
•
That the compensation committee will meet telephonically or in
person during the first business week of the third month of the
calendar quarter to approve grants of stock options and
stock-based awards.
•
That, to the extent practical, each quarterly meeting date will
be tentatively set at the prior quarter’s meeting.
•
That the compensation committee will not take action by written
consent with respect to the grant of stock options and
stock-based awards
Benefits and Other Compensation. We maintain broad-based
benefits that are provided to all employees, including health
and dental insurance, life and disability insurance, a 401(k)
plan, an employee assistance program, maternity and paternity
leave plans and standard company holidays. Our executive
officers are eligible to participate in all of our employee
benefit plans, in each case on the same basis as other
employees, except that we pay for parking for our executive
officers.
Severance
and Change in Control Benefits
We have severance arrangements with Ms. Goodman and
Messrs. Nault and Wasserman. These agreements provide, in
general, that in the event the executive is terminated without
cause (as defined in each agreement) or, in the case of
Messrs. Wasserman and Nault, there is a significant change
in his responsibilities or location, the executive will be
entitled to a severance benefit equal to six months salary plus
health insurance benefits. These arrangements were approved at
the time of hire by either the compensation committee or the
board of directors. See “Employment and Other
Agreements” below for additional information relating to
these agreements. In addition, each of the option agreements
entered into with our executive officers has a change in control
provision that provides that 50% of the unvested shares under
the option shall vest immediately prior to the change in control
and the balance will vest in the event the executive is
terminated within one year from the date of the change in
control.
We have provided more detailed information about these benefits,
along with estimates of their value under various circumstances,
under the caption “—Potential Payments Upon
Termination or Change of Control” below. Our compensation
committee believes that our severance and change of control
benefits are reasonable and generally consistent with severance
packages offered to executives at similarly situated companies.
Tax
Considerations
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, generally disallows a tax deduction for compensation in
excess of $1.0 million paid to our chief executive officer
and our four other most highly paid executive officers.
Qualifying performance-based compensation is not subject to the
deduction limitation if specified requirements are met. We
periodically review the potential consequences of
Section 162(m) and we generally intend to structure the
performance-based portion of our executive compensation, where
feasible, to comply with exemptions in Section 162(m) so
that the compensation remains tax deductible to us. However, the
compensation committee may, in its judgment, authorize
compensation payments that do not comply with the exemptions in
Section 162(m) when it believes that such payments are
appropriate to attract and retain executive talent.
The following table sets forth information regarding
compensation earned by our president and chief executive
officer, our vice president and chief financial officer and each
of our three other most highly compensated executive officers
during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. We refer
to these executive officers as our “named executive
officers” elsewhere in this prospectus.
Non-Equity
Option
Incentive Plan
All Other
Salary
Awards
Compensation
Compensation
Total
Name and Principal Position
Year
($)
($)(3)
($)(4)
($)(5)
($)
Gail F. Goodman
2007
$
275,900
$
78,221
$
132,197
$
840
$
487,158
President and Chief Executive Officer
2006
$
250,000
$
13,352
$
69,748
$
840
$
333,940
Steven R. Wasserman
2007
$
192,300
$
30,184
$
60,153
$
840
$
283,477
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
2006
$
165,000
$
1,295
$
38,161
$
840
$
205,296
Eric S. Groves
2007
$
200,000
$
21,316
$
83,594
$
840
$
305,750
Senior Vice President, Worldwide Strategy and Market
Development
2006
$
200,000
$
5,191
$
55,797
$
840
$
261,828
Ellen Brezniak(1)
2007
$
185,000
$
62,141
$
51,947
$
840
$
299,928
Vice President, Product Strategy
Robert P. Nault(2)
2007
$
153,269
$
70,950
$
52,660
$
630
$
277,509
Vice President and General Counsel
(1)
Ms. Brezniak joined our
company in September 2006.
Valuation of these stock and option
awards is based, in part, on the dollar amount of share based
compensation recognized for financial statement reporting
purposes in each of 2006 and 2007 computed in accordance with
SFAS 123R, excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures
related to service-based vesting conditions (which in our case
were none). We arrive at these amounts by taking the
compensation cost for these awards calculated under
SFAS 123R on the date of grant, and recognize this cost
over the period in which the named executive officer must
provide services in order to earn the award, typically four
years. The reported amounts include additional amounts that were
not recognized for financial statement reporting purposes in
each of 2006 and 2007, resulting from requirements of the SEC to
report in this summary compensation table awards made prior to
2006 using the modified prospective transition method pursuant
to SFAS 123R. Under the modified prospective transition
method, a portion of the grant date fair value determined under
SFAS 123R of equity awards that are outstanding on
January 1, 2006, the date we adopted SFAS 123R, is
recognized over those awards’ remaining vesting periods. In
2006, this additional amount was $7,445 for Ms. Goodman and
$2,522 for Mr. Groves. In 2007, this additional amount was
$1,970 for Ms. Goodman and $969 for Mr. Groves. These
amounts do not represent the actual amounts paid to or realized
by the named executive officer during 2006 and 2007. The
assumptions used by us with respect to the valuation of stock
and option awards are the same as those set forth in Note 6 to
our financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The individual awards reflected in the summary compensation
table for 2007 are further described below in the table
“2007 Grants of Plan-Based Awards.”
(4)
For 2007, the amounts shown were
paid during 2007 and in February 2008 to each of the named
executive officers for the achievement in 2007 of specified
performance objectives under our 2007 Executive Team Bonus Plan.
For 2006, the amounts shown were paid during 2006 and in January
2007 to each of the named executive officers for the achievement
in 2006 of specified performance objectives under our 2006
Executive Incentive Plan.
(5)
The amounts shown reflect life
insurance premiums and parking costs paid by us in each of 2006
and 2007 on behalf of each of the named executive officers.
The following table sets forth information regarding grants of
awards made to our named executive officers during or for the
year ended December 31, 2007.
All Other
Option
Awards:
Exercise or
Grant Date
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Number of
Base Price of
Fair Value
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
Securities
Option
of Option
Grant
Threshold
Target
Maximum
Underlying
Awards
Awards
Name
Date
($)
($)(1)
($)
Options (#)
($/share)(2)
($)(3)
Gail F. Goodman
–
–
$
124,100
–
–
–
–
12/6/07
–
–
–
65,000
$
22.27
$
865,800
Steven R. Wasserman
–
–
$
57,700
–
–
–
–
12/6/07
–
–
–
45,000
$
22.27
$
599,400
Eric S. Groves
–
–
$
80,000
–
–
–
–
12/6/07
–
–
–
30,000
$
22.27
$
399,600
Ellen Brezniak
–
–
$
50,000
–
–
–
–
12/6/07
–
–
–
45,000
$
22.27
$
599,400
Robert P. Nault
–
–
$
51,000
(4)
–
–
–
–
3/2/07
–
–
–
110,500
$
4.12
$
289,510
12/6/07
–
–
–
45,000
$
22.27
$
599,400
(1)
Our 2007 Executive Team Bonus Plan
was approved by the compensation committee of the board of
directors on December 7, 2006. Payouts under the 2007
Executive Team Bonus Plan were contingent upon the achievement
of certain quarterly financial performance goals, including AMRG
targets and adjusted EBITDA targets, and, with the exception of
Ms. Goodman, individual performance objectives. Thirty
percent of the potential payouts to Ms. Brezniak and
Messrs. Groves, Wasserman and Nault were contingent upon
their ability to achieve individual quarterly objectives
determined in advance by Ms. Goodman. There was no maximum
payout under the 2007 Executive Team Bonus Plan. The amounts
shown in the target column reflects the target amount payable
under the 2007 Executive Team Bonus Plan. The actual amounts
paid are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table above.
(2)
In determining the exercise price
for the option granted to Mr. Nault on March 2, 2007,
our compensation committee and board of directors utilized the
guideline public company method and the discounted future cash
flow method, which involved applying appropriate discount rates
to estimated cash flows that are based on our forecasts of
revenue, costs and capital. These methodologies are then used to
calculate four different valuation outcomes, which were then
probability weighted. The possible outcomes considered were a
sale of the company, an initial public offering, dissolution and
continuing operations as a private company. For option grants to
the named executive officers in December 2007, the compensation
committee determined that the fair value of our common stock was
equal to the last sale, or closing price, of our common stock on
the Nasdaq Global Market on December 6, 2007, the date of
grant. For additional discussion of our methodology for
determining the fair value of our common stock, see
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting
Policies.”
(3)
Valuation of these options is based
on the aggregate dollar amount of share based compensation
recognized for financial statement reporting purposes computed
in accordance with SFAS 123R over the term of these
options, excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures related
to service-based vesting conditions (which in our case were
none). The assumptions used by us with respect to the valuation
of stock and option awards are set forth in Note 6 to our
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
(4)
Mr. Nault joined our company
in March 2007 and, as a result, was not eligible to receive a
bonus in the first quarter of 2007.
The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding
option and stock awards held by our named executive officers at
December 31, 2007.
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Number of
Number of
Securities
Securities
Number of
Market Value
Underlying
Underlying
Shares or Units
of Shares or
Unexercised
Unexercised
Option
of Stock That
Units of Stock
Options
Options
Exercise
Option
Have Not
That Have Not
(#)
(#)
Price
Expiration
Vested
Vested
Name
Exercisable
Unexercisable
($)
Date
(#)
($)
Gail F. Goodman
5,200
(1)
–
$
36.15
6/7/2010
–
–
33,738
(2)
–
$
0.04
10/23/2013
–
–
57,728
(3)
48,106
$
0.06
2/10/2015
–
–
5,687
(4)
7,313
$
1.09
2/9/2016
–
–
29,250
(5)
87,750
$
3.05
12/7/2016
–
–
–
65,000
(6)
$
22.27
12/6/2017
–
–
Steven R. Wasserman
9,750
(7)
29,250
$
3.05
12/7/2016
–
–
–
45,000
(8)
$
22.27
12/6/2017
–
–
–
–
–
–
96,006
(9)
$
2,064,129
(10)
Eric S. Groves
2,925
(11)
–
$
41.54
2/7/2011
–
–
29,058
(12)
–
$
0.04
10/23/2013
–
–
19,448
(13)
16,205
$
0.06
2/10/2015
–
–
5,687
(14)
7,313
$
1.09
2/9/2016
–
–
4,875
(15)
14,625
$
3.05
12/6/2016
–
–
–
30,000
(16)
$
22.27
12/6/2017
–
–
Ellen Brezniak
37,559
(17)
82,632
$
2.68
9/20/2016
–
–
–
45,000
(18)
$
22.27
12/6/2017
–
–
Robert P. Nault
–
110,500
(19)
$
4.12
3/2/2017
–
–
–
45,000
(20)
$
22.27
12/6/2017
–
–
(1)
Our board of directors granted this
option to Ms. Goodman on June 7, 2000 and the shares
underlying such option were fully vested by June 7, 2004.
(2)
Our board of directors granted this
option to Ms. Goodman on October 23, 2003 and the
shares underlying such option were fully vested by
October 23, 2007. As of December 31, 2007,
Ms. Goodman had exercised a portion of this option to
purchase 56,228 shares of common stock.
(3)
Our board of directors granted this
option to Ms. Goodman on February 10, 2005.
Twenty-five percent of the shares underlying this option vested
on January 15, 2006 and the remaining 75% of the shares
underlying this option vest in 12 equal quarterly installments,
which vesting began on April 15, 2006, subject to continued
employment. As of December 31, 2007, Ms. Goodman had
exercised a portion of this option to purchase
48,105 shares of common stock.
(4)
Our board of directors granted this
option to Ms. Goodman on February 9, 2006. Twenty-five
percent of the shares underlying this option vested on
February 9, 2007 and the remaining 75% of the shares
underlying this option vest in 12 equal quarterly installments,
which vesting began on May 9, 2007, subject to continued
employment.
(5)
Our board of directors granted this
option to Ms. Goodman on December 7, 2006. Twenty-five
percent of the shares underlying this option vested on
December 7, 2007 and the remaining 75% of the shares
underlying this option vest in 12 equal quarterly installments,
which vesting began on March 7, 2008, subject to continued
employment.
(6)
Our compensation committee granted
this option to Ms. Goodman on December 6, 2007.
Twenty-five percent of the shares underlying this option vest on
December 6, 2008 and the remaining 75% of the shares
underlying this option vest in 12 equal quarterly installments
beginning on March 6, 2009, subject to continued employment.
(7)
Our board of directors granted this
option to Mr. Wasserman on December 7, 2006.
Twenty-five percent of the shares underlying this option vested
on December 7, 2007 and the remaining 75% of the shares
underlying this option vest in 12 equal quarterly
installments, which vesting began on March 7, 2008, subject
to continued employment.
Our compensation committee granted
this option to Mr. Wasserman on December 6, 2007.
Twenty-five percent of the shares underlying this option vest on
December 6, 2008 and the remaining 75% of the shares
underlying this option vest in 12 equal quarterly installments
beginning on March 6, 2009, subject to continued employment.
(9)
On December 8, 2005, our board
of directors granted to Mr. Wasserman the right to purchase
192,010 shares of restricted common stock for a purchase
price of $0.06 per share, which shares Mr. Wasserman
purchased. The restrictions on the shares lapsed as to 25% of
the shares on December 8, 2006 and the restrictions on the
remaining 75% of the shares lapse in 12 equal quarterly
installments, which lapsing began on March 8, 2007, subject
to continued employment.
(10)
This value was determined by
multiplying the number of restricted shares for which the
restrictions had not lapsed by the closing, or last sale price,
of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market on
December 31, 2007, or $21.50 per share.
(11)
Our board of directors granted this
option to Mr. Groves on February 7, 2001 and the
shares underlying such option were fully vested by
January 8, 2005.
(12)
Our board of directors granted this
option to Mr. Groves on October 23, 2003 and the
shares underlying such option were fully vested by
October 23, 2007. As of December 31, 2007,
Mr. Groves had exercised a portion of this option to
purchase 60,908 shares of common stock.
(13)
Our board of directors granted this
option to Mr. Groves on February 10, 2005. Twenty-five
percent of the shares underlying this option vested on
January 15, 2006 and the remaining 75% of the shares
underlying this option vest in 12 equal quarterly installments,
which vesting began on April 15, 2006, subject to continued
employment. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Groves had
exercised a portion of this option to purchase
16,204 shares of common stock.
(14)
Our board of directors granted this
option to Mr. Groves on February 9, 2006. Twenty-five
percent of the shares underlying this option vested on
February 9, 2007 and the remaining 75% of the shares
underlying this option vest in 12 equal quarterly
installments, which vesting began on May 9, 2007, subject
to continued employment.
(15)
Our board of directors granted this
option to Mr. Groves on December 7, 2006. Twenty-five
percent of the shares underlying this option vested on
December 7, 2007 and the remaining 75% of the shares
underlying this option vest in 12 equal quarterly installments,
which vesting began on March 7, 2008, subject to continued
employment.
(16)
Our compensation committee granted
this option to Mr. Groves on December 6, 2007.
Twenty-five percent of the shares underlying this option vest on
December 6, 2008 and the remaining 75% of the shares
underlying this option vest in 12 equal quarterly installments
beginning on March 6, 2009, subject to continued employment.
(17)
Our board of directors granted this
option to Ms. Brezniak on September 20, 2006.
Twenty-five percent of the shares underlying this option vested
on September 20, 2007 and the remaining 75% of the shares
underlying this option vest in 12 equal quarterly
installments, which vesting began on December 20, 2007,
subject to continued employment.
(18)
Our compensation committee granted
this option to Ms. Brezniak on December 6, 2007.
Twenty-five percent of the shares underlying this option vest on
December 6, 2008 and the remaining 75% of the shares
underlying this option vest in 12 equal quarterly
installments beginning on March 6, 2009, subject to
continued employment.
(19)
Our compensation committee granted
this option to Mr. Nault on March 2, 2007. Twenty-five
percent of the shares underlying this option vested on
March 19, 2008 and the remaining 75% of the shares
underlying this option vest in 12 equal quarterly installments
beginning on June 19, 2008, subject to continued employment.
(20)
Our compensation committee granted
this option to Mr. Nault on December 6, 2007.
Twenty-five percent of the shares underlying this option vest on
December 6, 2008 and the remaining 75% of the shares
underlying this option vest in 12 equal quarterly
installments beginning on March 6, 2009, subject to
continued employment.
The following table sets forth information regarding options
exercised by our named executive officers and shares subject to
stock awards held by our named executive officers that vested
during the year ended December 31, 2007.
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Number of
Shares
Number of Shares
Acquired on
Value Realized on
Acquired on Vesting
Value Realized on
Name
Exercise (#)
Exercise ($)
(#)
Vesting ($)
Gail F. Goodman
–
–
–
–
Steven R. Wasserman
–
–
48,002
(1)
$
494,067
(1)
Eric S. Groves
4,680
(2)
$
44,741
(2)
–
–
Ellen Brezniak
–
–
–
–
Robert P. Nault
–
–
–
–
(1)
These shares of restricted stock
vested during 2007 as follows: 12,000 shares on
March 12, 2007, 12,001 shares on June 12, 2007,
12,000 shares on September 12, 2007 and
12,001 shares on December 12, 2007. The value realized
has been calculated by taking the fair market value of our
common stock at each of the vesting dates and multiplying it by
the number of vesting shares, and then totaling these amounts.
Prior to our initial public offering in October 2007, there was
no public market for our common stock. Our board of directors
determined that the fair value of our common stock on
March 12, 2007, June 12, 2007 and September 12,2007 was $4.12 per share, $6.89 per share and
$9.60 per share, respectively. The fair value of our common
stock on December 12, 2007 was $20.56 per share, the
last sale, or closing price, of our common stock on the Nasdaq
Global Market on that day. For a description of our methodology
for determining the fair value of our common stock, see
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting
Policies.”
(2)
Mr. Groves exercised these
options in September 2007. At that time, there was no public
market for our common stock. The value realized has been
calculated by taking the fair market value of our common stock
in September 2007 as determined by our board of directors, or
$9.60 per share, less the per share exercise price
multiplied by the number of stock options exercised.
Employment
and Other Agreements
We do not have formal employment agreements with any of our
named executive officers. As a condition to their employment,
each named executive officer entered into a non-competition,
non-disclosure and non-solicitation agreement. Pursuant to these
agreements, each named executive officer has agreed not to
compete with us or to solicit our employees during their
employment and for a period of one year after their employment
ends, to protect our confidential and proprietary information
and to assign to us all intellectual property conceived of or
developed during the term of their employment.
We entered into an offer letter with Ms. Goodman on
April 14, 1999 that sets forth the terms of her employment
as our chief executive officer. Ms. Goodman’s initial
annual base salary was $100,000 and she was eligible to earn an
annual bonus of $30,000. Ms. Goodman’s base salary has
been adjusted by our compensation committee of directors and is
currently $350,000 and she is eligible to earn a target annual
bonus for 2008 of $175,000. Pursuant to the offer letter, our
board of directors granted Ms. Goodman the right to
purchase 7,150 shares of restricted common stock at a
purchase price of $20.77 per share. The restricted shares
vested as to 12.5% on October 5, 1999 and as to 6.25% each
quarter thereafter. In the event Ms. Goodman’s
employment is terminated by us without cause, the offer letter
provides that she will be entitled to receive six months’
base salary and health insurance benefits.
We entered into an offer letter with Mr. Wasserman on
December 1, 2005 that sets forth the terms of his
employment as our vice president and chief financial officer.
Mr. Wasserman’s initial annual base salary under the
offer letter was $165,000. Mr. Wasserman’s base salary
has been adjusted by our compensation committee and is currently
$220,000. Pursuant to the offer letter, our board of directors
granted Mr. Wasserman the right to
purchase 192,010 shares of restricted common stock at
a purchase price of $0.06 per share. The grant was
effective on December 8, 2005, with 25% of the restricted
shares vesting at the end of Mr. Wasserman’s first
year of employment, and 6.25% of the restricted shares vesting
each quarter thereafter. In the event of a
change of control of our company, 50% of the unvested restricted
shares will become vested. In addition, if Mr. Wasserman is
terminated within the first year after the change of control,
the offer letter provides that the remaining unvested restricted
shares will vest. If Mr. Wasserman’s employment is
terminated by us without cause, or if there is a significant
change in his responsibilities or location that is unacceptable
to him, he will be entitled to receive six months’ salary
and medical coverage for himself and his dependents for six
months from the date of his termination.
We entered into an offer letter with Mr. Nault on
March 7, 2007 that sets forth the terms of his employment
as our vice president and general counsel. Mr. Nault’s
initial annual base salary under the offer letter was $200,000.
Mr. Nault’s base salary has been adjusted by our
compensation committee and is currently $210,000. Pursuant to
the offer letter, our compensation committee granted
Mr. Nault an option to purchase 110,500 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $4.12 per share. The
grant was effective on March 19, 2007, with 25% of the
shares underlying the option vesting at the end of
Mr. Nault’s first year of employment, and 6.25% of the
shares underlying the option vesting each quarter thereafter. In
the event of a change of control of our company, 50% of the
unvested shares under the option will become vested. In
addition, if Mr. Nault is terminated within the first year
after the change of control, the offer letter provides that the
remaining unvested shares under the option will vest. If
Mr. Nault’s employment is terminated by us without
cause, or if there is a significant change in his
responsibilities or location that is unacceptable to him, he
will be entitled to receive six months’ salary and medical
coverage for himself and his dependents for six months from the
date of his termination.
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control
In addition to the offer letters with Ms. Goodman and
Messrs. Wasserman and Nault described above, the option
agreements with each of our executive officers and the
restricted stock agreement with Mr. Wasserman provide that
in the event of a change of control, 50% of then unvested shares
or options subject to such agreements shall become vested. In
addition, under these agreements, if the named executive
officer’s employment is terminated within 12 months
after the change of control, any remaining unvested shares or
options subject to these agreements shall become vested. For
these purposes, “change of control” generally means
the consummation of the following: (a) the sale, transfer
or other disposition of substantially all of our assets to a
third party entity, (b) a merger or consolidation of our
company with a third party entity, or (c) a transfer of
more than 50% of the outstanding voting equity of our company to
a third party entity (other than in a financing transaction
involving the additional issuance of our securities).
The table below shows the benefits potentially payable to each
of our named executive officers if he or she was terminated
without cause, if there was a change of control of our company,
and if he or she was terminated within 12 months after a
change of control. These amounts are calculated on the
assumption that the employment termination and change of control
both took place on December 31, 2007.
Benefits Payable
Additional Benefits Payable Upon
Benefits Payable Upon Termination Without Cause
Upon a Change
Termination Within 12 Months of
Severance
Medical/
of Control
a Change of Control
Name
Payments
Dental(1)
Equity Benefits(2)
Equity Benefits(2)
Gail F. Goodman
$
175,000
$
7,338
$
1,399,820
$
1,399,820
Steven R. Wasserman
$
110,000
$
7,338
$
1,301,886
$
1,301,886
Eric S. Groves
–
–
$
244,106
$
244,106
Ellen Brezniak
–
–
$
1,140,407
$
1,140,407
Robert P. Nault
$
105,000
$
7,338
$
960,245
$
960,245
(1)
Calculated based on the estimated
cost to us of providing these benefits.
(2)
This amount is equal to
(a) the number of option shares or restricted shares that
would vest, assuming a December 31, 2007 change of control
and employment termination, multiplied by (b) in the case
of options, the excess of $21.50 over the exercise price of the
option or, in the case of restricted stock, $21.50. $21.50 was
the last sale, or closing, price of our common stock on the
Nasdaq Global Market on December 31, 2007.
Our 1999 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan, as amended, which we
refer to as the 1999 stock plan, was adopted by our board of
directors and approved by our stockholders in March 1999.
The 1999 stock plan provided for the grant of incentive stock
options, nonstatutory stock options, restricted stock and other
stock-based awards. Our employees, officers, directors,
consultants and advisors were eligible to receive awards under
the 1999 stock plan; however, incentive stock options were only
granted to our employees. In accordance with the terms of the
1999 stock plan, our board of directors, or a committee
appointed by our board of directors, administered the 1999 stock
plan and, subject to any limitations in the 1999 stock plan,
selected the recipients of awards and determined:
•
the number of shares of common stock covered by options and the
dates upon which those options become exercisable;
•
the exercise price of options;
•
the duration of options;
•
the methods of payment of the exercise price of options; and
•
the number of shares of common stock subject to any restricted
stock or other stock-based awards and the terms and conditions
of those awards, including the conditions for vesting or
repurchase, issue price and repurchase price.
Unless otherwise provided in any individual option agreement, in
the event of our merger or consolidation with or into another
entity or the sale of all or substantially all of our assets as
a result of which our common stock is converted into the right
to receive securities, cash or other property, or in the event
of our liquidation, our board of directors or the board of
directors of any corporation assuming our obligations shall, in
its discretion, provide that all outstanding options under the
1999 stock plan be assumed or substituted for by the successor
corporation. Alternatively, our board of directors may provide
written notice to option holders that all unexercised options
will become exercisable in full prior to completion of the
reorganization event, and will terminate if not exercised prior
to that time. If under the terms of the reorganization event
holders of our common stock receive cash for their surrendered
shares, our board of directors may instead provide for a
cash-out of the value of any outstanding options based on the
surrender value less the applicable exercise price. Our board of
directors may also provide that each outstanding option shall
terminate in exchange for a cash payment equal to the fair
market value of our common stock less the applicable exercise
price.
Our board of directors may at any time modify or amend the 1999
stock plan in any respect, except that stockholder approval will
be required for any revision that is required to comply with
applicable law, and provided further that optionholder approval
will be required for any modification that affects the
optionholder’s rights under any outstanding options.
Since the effective date of the 2007 stock incentive plan
described below, we no longer grant stock options or other
stock-based awards under the 1999 stock plan.
2007
Stock Incentive Plan
Our 2007 stock incentive plan, which became effective on
October 9, 2007, was adopted by our board of directors and
approved by our stockholders in September 2007. The 2007 stock
incentive plan provides for the grant of incentive stock
options, non-statutory stock options, restricted stock,
restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights and other
stock-based awards. A maximum of 2,900,000 shares of common
stock are currently authorized for issuance under our 2007 stock
incentive plan.
In addition, our 2007 stock incentive plan contains an
“evergreen provision” that allows for an annual
increase in the number of shares available for issuance under
our 2007 stock incentive plan on the first day of each year
until the second day of 2017. The annual increase in the number
of shares shall be equal to the lowest of:
•
700,000 shares of common stock;
•
5% of the aggregate number of shares of common stock outstanding
on the first day of the applicable year; and
•
an amount determined by our board of directors.
Our employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors are
eligible to receive awards under our 2007 stock incentive plan;
however, incentive stock options may only be granted to our
employees. The maximum number of shares of common stock with
respect to which awards may be granted to any participant under
the plan is 500,000 per fiscal year.
Our 2007 stock incentive plan provides for the automatic grant
of options to members of our board of directors who are not our
employees. Each non-employee director will receive an option to
purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock upon his or her
initial appointment to our board of directors. Each non-employee
director will also receive an annual option grant to purchase
10,000 shares of our common stock at each annual meeting of
stockholders after which he or she continues to serve as a
director, provided each such non-employee director has served on
our board of directors for at least six months prior to such
annual meeting. All of these options will vest over a 3-year
period, with 33.33% of the shares underlying the option vesting
on the first anniversary of the date of grant, or in the case of
annual option grants one business day prior to the next annual
meeting, if earlier, and an additional 8.33% of the shares
underlying the option vesting each three months thereafter,
subject to the non-employee director’s continued service as
a director. The exercise price of these options will equal the
fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. In
the event of a change in control, the form of standard option
agreement for non-employee directors provides that the vesting
of these options will accelerate in full. Our board of directors
can increase or decrease the number of shares subject to options
granted to non-employee directors and can issue restricted stock
or other stock-based awards in addition to some or all of the
options otherwise issuable. In addition, our board of directors
may provide for accelerated vesting of any such options upon
death, disability, change in control, attainment of mandatory
retirement age or retirement following at least 10 years of
service and may include any such other terms and conditions as
our board of directors determines.
Our 2007 stock incentive plan is administered by our board of
directors. Pursuant to the terms of the 2007 stock incentive
plan and to the extent permitted by law, our board of directors
may delegate authority under the 2007 stock incentive plan to
one or more committees or subcommittees of our board of
directors or to our executive officers. Our board of directors
or any committee to whom our board of directors delegates
authority selects the recipients of awards and determines:
•
the number of shares of common stock covered by options and the
dates upon which the options become exercisable;
•
the exercise price of options;
•
the duration of the options;
•
the methods of payment of the exercise price of options; and
•
the number of shares of common stock subject to any restricted
stock or other stock-based awards and the terms and conditions
of such awards, including conditions for vesting or repurchase,
issue price and repurchase price.
If our board of directors delegates authority to an executive
officer to grant awards under the 2007 stock incentive plan, the
executive officer has the power to make awards to all of our
employees, except executive officers. Our board of directors
will fix the terms of the awards to be granted by such executive
officer, including the exercise price of such awards, and the
maximum number of shares subject to awards that such executive
officer may make.
Upon a merger or other reorganization event, our board of
directors may, in its sole discretion, take any one or more of
the following actions pursuant to our 2007 stock incentive plan,
as to some or all outstanding awards:
•
provide that all outstanding awards shall be assumed or
substituted by the acquiring or successor corporation;
•
upon written notice to a participant, provide that the
participant’s unexercised options or awards will terminate
immediately prior to the consummation of such transaction unless
exercised by the participant within a specific period following
such notice;
•
provide that outstanding awards will become exercisable,
realizable or deliverable, or restrictions applicable to an
award will lapse, in whole or in part, prior to or upon the
reorganization event;
•
in the event of a reorganization event pursuant to which holders
of our common stock will receive a cash payment for each share
surrendered in the reorganization event, make or provide for a
cash payment to the participants equal to the excess, if any, of
the acquisition price times the number of shares of our common
stock subject to such outstanding awards (to the extent then
exercisable at prices not in excess of the acquisition price),
over the aggregate exercise price of all such outstanding awards
and any applicable tax withholdings, in exchange for the
termination of such awards; and/or
•
provide that, in connection with our liquidation or dissolution,
awards convert into the right to receive liquidation proceeds
net of the exercise price thereof and any applicable tax
withholdings.
Upon the occurrence of a reorganization event other than our
liquidation or dissolution, the repurchase and other rights
under each outstanding restricted stock award will continue for
the benefit of the successor company and will, unless the board
of directors may otherwise determine, apply to the cash,
securities or other property into which our common stock is
converted pursuant to the reorganization event. Upon the
occurrence of a reorganization event involving our liquidation
or dissolution, all conditions on each outstanding restricted
stock award will automatically be deemed terminated or
satisfied, unless otherwise provided in the agreement evidencing
the restricted stock award.
No award may be granted under the 2007 stock incentive plan
after September 4, 2017, but the vesting and effectiveness
of awards granted before that date may extend beyond that date.
Our board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate the 2007
stock incentive plan at any time, except that stockholder
approval will be required for any revision that would materially
increase the number of shares reserved for issuance, expand the
types of awards available under the plan, materially modify plan
eligibility requirements, extend the term of the plan or
materially modify the method of determining the exercise price
of options granted under the plan, or otherwise as required to
comply with applicable law or stock market requirements.
As of December 31, 2007, there were options to purchase
2,200,622 shares of common stock outstanding under the 1999
and 2007 stock plans at a weighted average exercise price of
$6.32 per share. As of December 31, 2007,
2,983,834 shares of common stock had been issued pursuant
to awards under the 1999 stock plan.
2007
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Our 2007 employee stock purchase plan, which we refer to as
the purchase plan, was adopted by our board of directors and
approved by our stockholders in September 2007 and became
effective on October 9, 2007. We have reserved a total of
350,000 shares of our common stock for issuance to
participating employees under the purchase plan. The purchase
plan is administered by our board of directors or by a committee
appointed by our board of directors.
All of our employees, including our directors who are employees
and all employees of any of our participating subsidiaries, who
have been employed by us for at least three months prior to
enrolling in the purchase plan, who are employees on the first
day of the purchase plan period, and whose customary employment
is for more than 30 hours a week and more than five months
in any calendar year, are eligible to participate in the
purchase plan. Employees who would, immediately after being
granted an option to purchase shares under the
purchase plan, own 5% or more of the total combined voting power
or value of our common stock are not eligible to participate in
the purchase plan.
We make offerings to our employees to purchase stock under the
purchase plan. Offerings begin on each of January 1 and
July 1, or the first business day thereafter. Each offering
commencement date begins a six-month purchase plan period during
which payroll deductions are made and held for the purchase of
the common stock at the end of such purchase plan period. The
first offering under the purchase plan began on January 1,2008. Our board of directors or the committee may, at its
discretion, choose a different purchase plan period of
12 months or less.
On the first day of a designated payroll deduction period, or
offering period, we grant to each eligible employee who has
elected to participate in the purchase plan an option to
purchase shares of our common stock. The employee may authorize
up to 10% of his or her compensation to be deducted by us during
the offering period. On the last day of the offering period, the
employee will be deemed to have exercised the option, at the
option exercise price, to the extent of accumulated payroll
deductions. Under the terms of the purchase plan, the option
exercise price shall be determined by our board of directors or
the committee, based on the lesser of the closing price of our
common stock on the first business day of the plan period or the
exercise date, as defined in the purchase plan, or shall be
based solely on the closing price of our common stock on the
exercise date, provided that the option exercise price shall be
at least 85% of the applicable closing price. In the absence of
a determination by our board of directors or the committee, the
option exercise price will be 85% of the closing price of our
common stock on the exercise date. Our board of directors has
determined that the current option exercise price will be 85% of
the closing price of our common stock on the exercise date.
An employee who is not a participant on the last day of the
offering period will not be entitled to exercise any option, and
the employee’s accumulated payroll deductions will be
refunded. An employee’s rights under the purchase plan will
terminate upon voluntary withdrawal from the purchase plan at
any time, or when the employee ceases employment for any reason,
except that upon termination of employment because of death, the
balance in the employee’s account will be paid to the
employee’s beneficiary.
401(k)
Retirement Plan
We maintain a 401(k) retirement plan that is intended to be a
tax-qualified defined contribution plan under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. In general,
all of our employees are eligible to participate in the 401(k)
plan. The 401(k) plan includes a salary deferral arrangement
pursuant to which participants may elect to reduce their current
compensation on a pre-tax basis by up to the statutorily
prescribed limit, equal to $15,500 in 2008, and have the amount
of the reduction contributed to the 401(k) plan. We are
permitted to match employees’ 401(k) plan contributions;
however, we do not do so currently.
Limitations
on Officers’ and Directors’ Liability and
Indemnification Agreements
As permitted by Delaware law, our restated certificate of
incorporation contains provisions that limit or eliminate the
personal liability of our directors for breach of fiduciary duty
of care as a director. Our restated certificate of incorporation
limits the liability of directors to the maximum extent
permitted by Delaware law. Delaware law provides that directors
of a corporation will not be personally liable for monetary
damages for breaches of their fiduciary duties as directors,
except liability for:
•
any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to us or our
stockholders;
•
any act or omission not in good faith or that involves
intentional misconduct or knowing violation of law;
•
any unlawful payments of dividends or other
distributions; or
•
any transaction from which the director derived an improper
personal benefit.
These limitations do not apply to liabilities arising under
federal securities laws and do not affect the availability of
equitable remedies, including injunctive relief or rescission.
If Delaware law is amended to
authorize the further elimination or limitation of liability of
a director, then the liability of our directors will be
eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by
Delaware law as so amended.
As permitted by Delaware law, our restated certificate of
incorporation also provides that:
•
we will indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest
extent permitted by law;
•
we may indemnify our other employees and other agents to the
same extent that we indemnify our officers and directors, unless
otherwise determined by our board of directors; and
•
we will advance expenses to our directors and officers in
connection with a legal proceeding to the fullest extent
permitted by law.
In addition to the indemnification provided for in our restated
certificate of incorporation we have entered into
indemnification agreements with each of our directors and
officers. Each indemnification agreement provides that we will
indemnify the director or officer to the fullest extent
permitted by law for claims arising in his or her capacity as
our director, officer, employee or agent, provided that he or
she acted in good faith and in a manner that he or she
reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, our best
interests and, with respect to any criminal proceeding, had no
reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was
unlawful. In the event that we do not assume the defense of a
claim against a director or officer, we are required to advance
his or her expenses in connection with his or her defense,
provided that he or she undertakes to repay all amounts advanced
if it is ultimately determined that he or she is not entitled to
be indemnified by us.
We believe that these provisions and agreements are necessary to
attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted for directors, officers or
persons controlling our company pursuant to the foregoing
provisions, the opinion of the SEC is that such indemnification
is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and
is therefore unenforceable.
In addition, we maintain a general liability insurance policy
that covers certain liabilities of directors and officers of our
corporation arising out of claims based on acts or omissions in
their capacities as directors or officers.
Rule 10b5-1
Sales Plans
Our directors and executive officers may adopt written plans,
known as
Rule 10b5-1
plans, in which they will contract with a broker to buy or sell
shares of our common stock on a periodic basis. Under a
Rule 10b5-1
plan, a broker executes trades pursuant to parameters
established by the director or officer when entering into the
plan, without further direction from them. The director or
officer may amend or terminate the plan in some circumstances.
Our directors and executive officers may also buy or sell
additional shares outside of a
Rule 10b5-1
plan when they are not in possession of material, nonpublic
information.
The following table sets forth information regarding the
beneficial ownership of our common stock as of January 31,2008, except as noted below, by:
•
each of our directors;
•
each of our named executive officers;
•
each person, or group of affiliated persons, who is known by us
to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock;
•
all of our directors and executive officers as a group; and
•
each selling stockholder.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules
of the SEC. These rules generally attribute beneficial ownership
of securities to persons who possess sole or shared voting power
or investment power with respect to those securities and include
shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock
options that are immediately exercisable or exercisable within
60 days after January 31, 2008. Except as otherwise
indicated in the footnotes to the table below, all of the shares
reflected in the table are shares of common stock and all
persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with
respect to the shares beneficially owned by them, subject to
applicable community property laws. The information is not
necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other
purpose.
Percentage ownership calculations for beneficial ownership prior
to this offering are based on 27,619,842 shares outstanding
as of January 31, 2008. Percentage ownership calculations
for beneficial ownership after this offering also include the
shares we are offering hereby.
Hudson Venture Partners II, L.P., which we refer to as Hudson,
currently owns an aggregate of 2,795,677 shares of common
stock (approximately 10.12% of the outstanding shares of common
stock as of January 31, 2008). Immediately following the
effectiveness of the registration statement of which this
prospectus is a part, Hudson will effect a distribution of
2,795,677 shares of common stock to its partners in
accordance with the terms of its partnership agreement. An
aggregate of 2,259,072 shares of common stock to be sold in
this offering consists of shares received by certain partners in
this distribution from Hudson. The shares to be sold by partners
of Hudson holding collectively less than 1% of the outstanding
common stock as of January 31, 2008 are presented in the
following table on a group basis and are identified by the name
“Additional selling stockholders receiving shares in a
distribution from Hudson Venture Partners II, L.P.” All
other partners of Hudson are presented in the following table on
an individual basis. All shares distributed by Hudson to its
partners and not sold in this offering will be subject to
lock-up
agreements described in “Shares Eligible for Future
Sale —
Lock-up
Agreements.” Hudson will not be selling any shares in this
offering. Following the closing of this offering, Hudson will no
longer own any shares of our common stock.
In computing the number of shares of common stock beneficially
owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person,
we deemed outstanding shares of common stock subject to options
held by that person that are currently exercisable or
exercisable within 60 days of January 31, 2008. We did
not deem these shares outstanding, however, for the purpose of
computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
Beneficial ownership representing less than 1% is denoted with
an asterisk (*). Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes
to the table below, addresses of named beneficial owners are in
care of Constant Contact, Inc., Reservoir Place, 1601 Trapelo
Road, Suite 329, Waltham, Massachusetts02451.
Number of
Shares
Being
Shares Beneficially
Offered
Owned Assuming Full
Pursuant to
Exercise of an Option
Shares Beneficially Owned
Shares Beneficially Owned
an Option
Granted to the
Prior to Offering
Shares
After Offering
Granted to the
Underwriters
Name of Beneficial Owner
Number
Percentage
Offered
Number
Percentage
Underwriters
Number
Percentage
Named Executive Officers and Directors
Gail F. Goodman(1)
1,238,126
4.46
%
185,719
1,052,407
3.78
%
–
1,052,407
3.75
%
Ellen Brezniak(2)
45,072
*
–
45,072
*
–
45,072
*
Eric S. Groves(3)
411,354
1.49
%
60,000
351,354
1.27
%
–
351,354
1.25
%
Robert P. Nault(4)
27,625
*
–
27,625
*
–
27,625
*
Steven R. Wasserman(5)
204,198
*
–
204,198
*
–
204,198
*
Thomas Anderson(6)
19,500
*
–
19,500
*
–
19,500
*
Robert P. Badavas(7)
7,313
*
–
7,313
*
–
7,313
*
John Campbell(8)
176,160
*
–
176,160
*
–
176,160
*
Michael T. Fitzgerald(9)
3,267,205
11.83
%
104,944
3,162,261
11.41
%
104,944
3,057,317
10.94
%
Patrick Gallagher
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
William S. Kaiser(10)
2,189,019
7.93
%
110,000
2,079,019
7.50
%
110,000
1,969,019
7.05
%
All current executive officers and directors as a group
(14 persons)(11)
8,109,094
28.85
%
510,573
7,598,521
26.95
%
214,944
7,383,577
25.98
%
5% Stockholders
Entities affiliated with Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Venture
Partners(12)
4,653,883
16.85
%
870,000
3,783,883
13.66
%
130,000
3,653,883
13.08
%
Entities affiliated with Commonwealth Capital Ventures(9)
3,267,205
11.83
%
104,944
3,162,261
11.41
%
104,944
3,057,317
10.94
%
Hudson Venture Partners II, L.P.(13)
2,795,677
10.12
%
–
–
–
–
–
–
Entities affiliated with Greylock Partners(10)
2,189,019
7.93
%
110,000
2,079,019
7.50
%
110,000
1,969,019
7.05
%
Longworth Venture Partners, L.P(14).
1,667,148
6.04
%
700,000
967,148
3.49
%
105,000
862,148
3.09
%
Other Selling Stockholders
Thomas Howd(15)
231,051
*
10,000
221,051
*
–
221,051
*
Janet M. Muto(16)
277,215
1.00
%
100,000
177,215
*
–
177,215
*
Daniel Richards(17)
266,065
*
39,910
226,155
*
–
226,155
*
Certain non-executive employees of Constant Contact, Inc.
(6 persons)(18)
112,746
*
16,946
95,800
*
–
95,800
*
Ad-Venture Capital Partners, L.P.(19)(20)
31,950
*
20,000
11,950
*
–
11,950
*
Court Square Capital Limited(19)(21)
31,950
*
31,950
–
–
–
–
–
Kamran T. Elghanayan(19)
15,975
*
15,975
–
–
–
–
–
First Niagara Bank(19)(22)
15,975
*
15,975
–
–
–
–
–
Glen S. Lewy Associates L.P.(23)(24)
162,547
*
80,149
82,398
*
–
82,398
*
Jay N. Goldberg and Mary Cirillo-Goldberg, Joint with Rights of
Survivorship(23)
162,546
*
80,000
82,546
–
–
82,546
–
2000 Goldberg Family Limited Partnership(23)(25)
7,988
*
7,988
–
–
–
–
–
Kim P. Goh(23)
162,546
*
81,274
81,272
–
–
81,272
–
James and Nancy Grosfeld Jt Tenants(19)
31,950
*
15,975
15,975
*
–
15,975
*
Hilltop Holding Company, L.P.(19)(26)
15,976
*
7,988
7,988
*
–
7,988
*
Lawrence Howard(23)
162,546
*
110,000
52,546
*
–
52,546
*
Frank N. Newman(19)
9,585
*
9,585
–
–
–
–
–
Parkland Capital Fund II, L.P.(19)(27)
31,950
*
31,950
–
–
–
–
–
PNC Equities, LLC(19)(28)
15,975
*
15,975
–
–
–
–
–
Leonard S. Simon(19)
15,975
*
15,975
–
–
–
–
–
SK Private Investment Fund 1998 LLC(19)(29)
31,950
*
31,950
–
–
–
–
–
Glen A. Tobias(19)
7,988
*
7,988
–
–
–
–
–
U.S. Small Business Administration(30)
1,397,839
4.82
%
1,397,839
–
–
–
–
–
Valentis Investors LLC(19)(31)
31,950
*
31,950
–
–
–
–
–
Additional selling stockholders receiving shares in a
distribution from Hudson Venture Partners II, L.P.
(37 persons)(19)
269,195
*
248,586
20,609
*
–
20,609
*
(1)
Includes 149,350 shares
subject to options exercisable within 60 days of
January 31, 2008.
(2)
Includes 45,072 shares subject
to options exercisable within 60 days of January 31,2008.
Includes 67,266 shares subject
to options exercisable within 60 days of January 31,2008.
(4)
Includes 27,625 shares subject
to options exercisable within 60 days of January 31,2008.
(5)
Includes 12,188 shares subject
to options exercisable within 60 days of January 31,2008.
(6)
Includes 19,500 shares subject
to options exercisable within 60 days of January 31,2008.
(7)
Includes 7,313 shares subject
to options exercisable within 60 days of January 31,2008.
(8)
The shares reported as beneficially
owned include 176,160 shares held jointly with
Mr. Campbell’s wife, Mrs. Jean Campbell.
(9)
Consists of 3,113,289 shares
held by Commonwealth Capital Ventures II L.P. and
153,916 shares held by CCV II Associates L.P. The general
partner of Commonwealth Capital Ventures II L.P. and CCV II
Associates L.P. is Commonwealth Venture Partners II L.P.
Michael T. Fitzgerald, a member of our board of directors,
Jeffrey M. Hurst, R. Stephen McCormack and Justin J. Perreault
are the general partners of Commonwealth Venture
Partners II L.P. Accordingly, they may be deemed to share
beneficial ownership of the shares beneficially owned by
Commonwealth Capital Ventures II L.P. and CCV II Associates
L.P., although each of them disclaims beneficial ownership of
such shares, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest
therein. The address of Commonwealth Venture Partners II
L.P. is 950 Winter Street, Suite 4100, Waltham,
Massachusetts02451.
(10)
Consists of 1,871,613 shares
held by Greylock XII Limited Partnership, 207,956 shares
held by Greylock XII-A Limited Partnership and
109,450 shares held by Greylock XII Principals LLC. The
general partner of Greylock XII Limited Partnership and
Greylock XII-A Limited Partnership is Greylock XII GP LLC. The
members of Greylock XII GP LLC and Greylock XII Principals LLC
are: Aneel Bhusri, Thomas Bogan, Asheem Chandna, Charles Chi,
Roger Evans, William Helman, William Kaiser, a member of our
board of directors, Donald Sullivan and David Sze. Each of these
individuals exercises shared voting and investment power over
the shares held of record by Greylock XII Limited Partnership,
Greylock XII-A Limited Partnership and Greylock XII Principals
LLC and disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to
the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. The address of the
entities affiliated with Greylock Partners is 880 Winter Street,
Waltham, Massachusetts02451.
(11)
Includes 490,030 shares
subject to options exercisable within 60 days of
January 31, 2008.
(12)
Consists of 4,029,232 shares
held by Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Venture Partners IV, L.P.,
467,455 shares held by Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Venture
Investors IV, L.P. and 157,196 shares held by Morgan
Stanley Dean Witter Venture Offshore Investors IV, L.P. MSDW
Venture Partners IV, LLC is the general partner of each of
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Venture Partners IV, L.P., Morgan
Stanley Dean Witter Venture Investors IV, L.P. and Morgan
Stanley Dean Witter Venture Offshore Investors IV, L.P. MSDW
Venture Partners IV, Inc. is the member of the general partner
and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley. The address of
the entities affiliated with Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Venture
Partners is 1221 Avenue of the Americas, 39th Floor, New York,
New York10020.
(13)
The general partner of Hudson
Venture Partners II, L.P. is Hudson Ventures II, LLC. The
managing members of Hudson Ventures II, LLC are Glen Lewy, Jay
Goldberg, Kim Goh and Dr. Lawrence Howard. Each of these
individuals exercises shared voting and investment power over
the shares held of record by Hudson Venture Partners II, L.P.
and disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the
extent of his pecuniary interest therein. The address of Hudson
Venture Partners II, L.P. is 535 Fifth Avenue, 14th Floor,
New York, New York10021. Immediately prior to, and contingent
upon, the closing of this offering, Hudson Venture Partners II,
L.P. will effect a distribution of all shares to its partners.
(14)
The general partner of Longworth
Venture Partners, L.P. is Longworth Venture Management, LLC. The
managers of Longworth Venture Management, LLC are Paul Margolis
and James Savage, a former member of our board of directors.
Each of these individuals exercises shared voting and investment
power over the shares held of record by Longworth Venture
Partners, L.P. and disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares
except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. The
address of Longworth Venture Partners, L.P. is 1050 Winter
Street, Suite 2600, Waltham, Massachusetts02451.
(15)
Includes 69,872 shares subject
to options exercisable within 60 days of January 31,2008. Mr. Howd is Senior Vice President, Customer
Operations of Constant Contact, Inc.
(16)
Includes 44,444 shares subject
to options exercisable within 60 days of January 31,2008.
(17)
Includes 75,838 shares subject
to options exercisable within 60 days of January 31,2008. Mr. Richards is Vice President, Engineering of
Constant Contact, Inc.
(18)
Includes 39,118 shares subject
to options exercisable within 60 days of January 31,2008, 1,159 of which are being exercised and sold in connection
with this offering.
(19)
All shares being sold by this
partner of Hudson Venture Partners II, L.P. will be
received by such partner pursuant to a distribution effected by
Hudson Venture Partners II, L.P. immediately following the
effectiveness of the registration statement of which this
prospectus is a part.
(20)
Brian F. Addy exercises voting and
investment power with respect to these shares.
(21)
Adrian Millan, vice president
of Court Square Capital Limited, exercises voting and investment
power with respect to these shares.
(22)
Michael Harrington, chief financial
officer of First Niagara Bank, and Jeffrey Maddigan, treasurer
of First Niagara Bank, exercise voting and investment power with
respect to these shares.
(23)
These shares are being sold by a
managing member or a family entity associated with a managing
member of Hudson Ventures II, LLC, the general partner of
Hudson Venture Partners II, L.P., following a distribution
by Hudson Venture Partners II, L.P. effected immediately
following the effectiveness of the registration statement of
which this prospectus is a part.
(24)
Includes 82,398 shares owned
individually by Glen S. Lewy. Glen S. Lewy exercises voting and
investment power with respect to these shares.
(25)
Jay Goldberg, a partner of 2000
Goldberg Family Limited Partnership, exercises voting and
investment power with respect to these shares.
(26)
Jack Silver, the general partner of
Hilltop Holding Company, L.P., exercises voting and
investment power with respect to these shares.
(27)
Peter A. Kuhn, president and chief
executive officer of Parkland Management Co., the general
partner of Parkland Capital Fund II, L.P., exercises voting
and investment power with respect to these shares.
(28)
David M. Hillman,
Maria C. Schaffer, Bill Parsley, David J. Blair,
Peter M. Chiste, Bill S. Demchak and Michael J.
Hannon are the managers of PNC Equities, LLC. Each of
these individuals exercises shared voting and investment power
with respect to these shares.
(29)
Susan Dornfeld, administrator on
behalf of SK Private Investment Fund 1998 LLC, exercises
voting and investment power with respect to these shares.
(30)
The shares will be received in the
distribution and sold in the offering for the benefit of the
U.S. Small Business Administration by Hudson Management
Associates LLC, as escrow agent. The managing members of Hudson
Management Associates LLC are Glen Lewy, Jay Goldberg, Kim Goh
and Dr. Lawrence Howard, each of whom disclaims beneficial
ownership of such shares. The address of Hudson Management
Associates LLC is 535 Fifth Avenue,
14th
Floor, New York, New York10017.
(31)
Joseph M. Jacobs and Charles E.
Davidson, as managing members of Wexford Capital LLC, the
manager of Valentis Investors LLC, exercise voting and
investment power with respect to these shares.
Since January 1, 2005, we have engaged in the following
transactions with our directors, executive officers and holders
of more than 5% of our voting securities, and affiliates and
immediate family members of our directors, executive officers
and 5% stockholders. We believe that all of the transactions
described below were made on terms no less favorable to us than
could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties:
Logoworks
Mr. Groves, our Senior Vice President, Worldwide Strategy
and Market Development, served as a director of Logoworks from
December 2003 until Hewlett-Packard Company acquired
Logoworks’ corporate parent, Arteis, Inc., in May 2007.
Logoworks is one of our channel partners and we pay Logoworks
fees based on the volume of paying customers referred to us. We
have also used the design services of Logoworks in creating some
of the templates used in our email marketing product. In 2007,
2006 and 2005, our aggregate payments to Logoworks were
approximately $36,000, $164,000 and $107,000, respectively.
RightNow
Technologies
We utilize customer and marketing support software licensed to
us by RightNow Technologies, Inc., a publicly traded customer
relationship service provider. In 2007, 2006 and 2005 our
aggregate payments to RightNow Technologies were approximately
$508,000, $253,000 and $33,000, respectively. Investment
entities affiliated with Greylock Partners owned, as of
December 31, 2007, approximately 13% of the outstanding
common stock of RightNow Technologies. Roger L. Evans, a general
partner of Greylock Partners, served on the board of directors
of RightNow Technologies until December 2007. William S. Kaiser,
a member of our board of directors, is a general partner of
Greylock Partners.
Oppenheimer
& Co. Inc.
Mark Goodman, Managing Director, Head of Consumer and Business
Services Group of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., a co-managing
underwriter of this offering, is the brother of Gail F. Goodman.
Ms. Goodman is our Chairman, President, Chief Executive
Officer and the beneficial holder of more than 4.4% of our
voting securities prior to this offering. Mr. Goodman was
formerly Managing Director, Head of Consumer and Business
Services Group at CIBC World Markets Corp., a co-managing
underwriter of our initial public offering. In connection with
this offering and our initial public offering, we entered into
underwriting agreements with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. and
CIBC World Markets Corp., respectively, and the other
underwriters of the offerings. For more information with respect
to the terms of the underwriting agreement in connection with
this offering, see “Underwriting.”
Stock
Issuances
In May 2006 and July 2006, we issued and sold an aggregate of
2,521,432 shares of our Series C redeemable
convertible preferred stock at a price of $5.949 per share to
individual investors for an aggregate purchase price of
$14,999,998.98. These shares automatically converted into
3,277,851 shares of common stock upon completion of our
initial public offering. The table below sets forth the number
of shares of our Series C redeemable convertible preferred
stock sold to our directors and 5% stockholders and their
affiliates:
Number of Shares
of Series C Redeemable
Convertible
Aggregate
Name
Preferred Stock
Purchase Price ($)
Entities affiliated with Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Venture
Partners
272,532
1,621,292.87
Entities affiliated with Commonwealth Capital Ventures
The holders of our previously outstanding redeemable convertible
preferred stock and certain holders of our common stock have the
right to demand that we file a registration statement or request
that their shares be covered by a registration statement that we
are otherwise filing. These rights are provided under the terms
of amended and restated investor rights agreements we entered
into in 2001 and 2006 with these holders, which include some of
our directors, executive officers and holders of more than 5% of
our voting securities and their affiliates. For a more detailed
description of these registration rights, see “Description
of Capital Stock—Registration Rights.”
Indemnification
Agreements
Our restated certificate of incorporation provides that we will
indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent
permitted by Delaware law. In addition, we entered into
indemnification agreements with each of our directors and
officers that may be broader in scope than the specific
indemnification provisions contained in the Delaware General
Corporation Law. For more information regarding these
agreements, see “Management—Limitations on
Officers’ and Directors’ Liability and Indemnification
Agreements.”
Policies
and Procedures for Related Party Transactions
In August 2007, our board of directors adopted a written related
person transaction policy to set forth the policies and
procedures for the review and approval or ratification of
related person transactions. This policy covers any transaction,
arrangement or relationship, or any series of similar
transactions, arrangements or relationships in which we were or
are to be a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000,
and a related person had or will have a direct or indirect
material interest, including, without limitation, purchases of
goods or services by or from the related person or entities in
which the related person has a material interest, indebtedness,
guarantees of indebtedness, and employment by us of a related
person.
Any related person transaction proposed to be entered into by us
must be reported to our general counsel and will be reviewed and
approved by the audit committee in accordance with the terms of
the policy, prior to effectiveness or consummation of the
transaction, whenever practicable. If our general counsel
determines that advance approval of a related person transaction
is not practicable under the circumstances, the audit committee
will review and, in its discretion, may ratify the related
person transaction at the next meeting of the audit committee,
or at the next meeting following the date that the related
person transaction comes to the attention of our general
counsel. Our general counsel, however, may present a related
person transaction arising in the time period between meetings
of the audit committee to the chairman of the audit committee,
who will review and may approve the related person transaction,
subject to ratification by the audit committee at the next
meeting of the audit committee.
In addition, any related person transaction previously approved
by the audit committee or otherwise already existing that is
ongoing in nature will be reviewed by the audit committee
annually to ensure that such related person transaction has been
conducted in accordance with the previous approval granted by
the audit committee, if any, and that all required disclosures
regarding the related person transaction are made.
Transactions involving compensation of executive officers will
be reviewed and approved by the compensation committee in the
manner specified in the charter of the compensation committee.
A related person transaction reviewed under this policy will be
considered approved or ratified if it is authorized by the audit
committee in accordance with the standards set forth in this
policy after full disclosure of the related person’s
interests in the transaction. As appropriate for the
circumstances, the audit committee will review and consider:
•
the related person’s interest in the related person
transaction;
•
the approximate dollar value of the amount involved in the
related person transaction;
•
the approximate dollar value of the amount of the related
person’s interest in the transaction without regard to the
amount of any profit or loss;
•
whether the transaction was undertaken in the ordinary course of
business;
whether the transaction with the related person is proposed to
be, or was, entered into on terms no less favorable to us than
terms that could have been reached with an unrelated third party;
•
the purpose of, and the potential benefits to us of, the
transaction; and
•
any other information regarding the related person transaction
or the related person in the context of the proposed transaction
that would be material to investors in light of the
circumstances of the particular transaction.
The audit committee will review all relevant information
available to it about the related person transaction. The audit
committee may approve or ratify the related person transaction
only if the audit committee determines that, under all of the
circumstances, the transaction is in or is not inconsistent with
our best interests. The audit committee may, in its sole
discretion, impose conditions as it deems appropriate on us or
the related person in connection with approval of the related
person transaction.
John Arnold, our Director, Local Experts Program, is the
brother-in-law of Eric S. Groves, our Senior Vice President,
Worldwide Strategy and Market Development.
Our authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares
of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and
5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per
share, all of which preferred stock is undesignated.
The following description of our capital stock and provisions of
our restated certificate of incorporation and second amended and
restated bylaws are summaries and are qualified by reference to
such documents. Copies of these documents have been filed or
incorporated by reference as exhibits to our registration
statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
Common
Stock
As of December 31, 2007, there were 27,617,014 shares
of our common stock outstanding, held of record by
171 stockholders.
Under the terms of our restated certificate of incorporation,
the holders of our common stock are generally entitled to one
vote for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of
the stockholders and do not have any cumulative voting rights.
Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive
proportionally any dividends declared by our board of directors
out of funds legally available therefor, subject to any
preferential dividend or other rights of any then outstanding
preferred stock.
In the event of our liquidation or dissolution, holders of our
common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets
remaining after payment of all debts and other liabilities,
subject to the prior rights of any then outstanding preferred
stock. Holders of our common stock have no preemptive,
subscription, redemption or conversion rights. All outstanding
shares of our common stock are validly issued, fully paid and
nonassessable. The shares to be issued by us in this offering
will be, when issued and paid for, validly issued, fully paid
and nonassessable.
The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of our common
stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the
rights of holders of shares of any series of preferred stock
that we may designate and issue in the future.
Preferred
Stock
Under the terms of our restated certificate of incorporation,
our board of directors is authorized to designate and issue up
to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more
series without stockholder approval. Our board of directors has
the discretion to determine the rights, preferences, privileges
and restrictions, including voting rights, dividend rights,
conversion rights, redemption privileges and liquidation
preferences, of each series of preferred stock, any or all of
which may be greater than or senior to the rights of the common
stock. The issuance of preferred stock could adversely affect
the voting power of holders of common stock and reduce the
likelihood that such holders will receive dividend payments or
payments on liquidation. In certain circumstances, an issuance
of preferred stock could have the effect of decreasing the
market price of our common stock.
Authorizing our board of directors to issue preferred stock and
determine its rights and preferences has the effect of
eliminating delays associated with a stockholder vote on
specific issuances. The issuance of preferred stock, while
providing flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions,
future financings and other corporate purposes, could have the
effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire,
or could discourage a third party from seeking to acquire, a
majority of our outstanding voting stock. We currently have no
shares of preferred stock outstanding, and we have no present
plans to issue any shares of preferred stock.
As of December 31, 2007, options to purchase
2,200,622 shares of common stock at a weighted average
exercise price of $6.32 per share were outstanding.
Warrants
As of December 31, 2007, we had outstanding a warrant to
purchase 520 shares of common stock with an exercise price
of $0.38 per share, which expires in March 2014.
Registration
Rights
We are a party to an amended and restated investors’ rights
agreement, or the 2001 investors’ rights agreement, with
certain holders of our common stock, an amended and restated
preferred investors’ rights agreement, or the 2006
investors’ rights agreement, with certain holders of our
previously outstanding redeemable convertible preferred stock,
our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and our
senior vice president, sales and business development and a
registration rights agreement with the holder of a warrant to
purchase 520 shares of our common stock. After the
completion of this offering and the sale by the selling
stockholders of the shares offered by them hereby, holders of a
total of approximately 12,595,556 shares of our common
stock and 520 shares of our common stock issuable upon the
exercise of a warrant will have the right to require us to
register these shares under the Securities Act under specific
circumstances. After registration pursuant to these rights,
these shares will become freely tradable without restriction
under the Securities Act. The following description of the terms
of the 2001 investors’ rights agreement and the 2006
investors’ rights agreement is intended as a summary only
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the agreements
filed or incorporated by reference as exhibits to the
registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
Demand Registration Rights. Beginning March 31,2008, the holders of at least 50% of our shares of common stock
having registration rights under the 2001 investors’ rights
agreement may demand that we register under the Securities Act
all or a portion of their shares subject to certain limitations.
We are required to effect no more than two registration
statements pursuant to this agreement. In addition, the holders
will have the right to make up to four requests that we register
on
Form S-3
all or a portion of the registrable shares held by them having
an aggregate offering price of at least $1,000,000.
Beginning March 31, 2008, the holders of at least 50% of
our shares of common stock having registration rights under the
2006 investors’ rights agreement may demand that we
register under the Securities Act all or a portion of their
shares subject to certain limitations. We are required to effect
no more than two registration statements pursuant to this
agreement. In addition, the holders will have the right to make
up to four requests that we register on
Form S-3
all or a portion of the registrable shares held by them having
an aggregate offering price of at least $1,000,000.
Incidental Registration Rights. If at any time following
this offering we propose to register shares of our common stock
under the Securities Act, other than on a registration statement
on
Form S-4
or S-8, for
our own account or for the account of any other holder, the
holders of registrable shares under the 2001 investors’
rights agreement, the 2006 investors’ rights agreement or
the warrant holder’s registration rights agreement will be
entitled to notice of the registration and, subject to certain
exceptions, have the right to require us to register all or a
portion of the registrable shares then held by them.
Limitations and Exceptions. In the event that any
registration in which the holders of registrable shares
participate is an underwritten public offering, the number of
registrable shares to be included may, in specified
circumstances, be limited due to market conditions.
We are required to pay all registration expenses, including the
reasonable fees and expenses of one legal counsel to the
registering security holders, but excluding underwriting
discounts and commissions. We are also required to indemnify
each participating holder with respect to each registration of
registrable shares that is effected. We have agreed to indemnify
certain holders of our redeemable convertible preferred stock
and of
our common stock issued upon the conversion of our redeemable
convertible preferred stock who are selling shares in this
offering.
Anti-Takeover
Effects of Delaware Law and Our Restated Certificate of
Incorporation
Delaware law, our restated certificate of incorporation and our
second amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that could
have the effect of delaying, deferring or discouraging another
party from acquiring control of us. These provisions, which are
summarized below, are expected to discourage coercive takeover
practices and inadequate takeover bids. These provisions are
also designed to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of
us to first negotiate with our board of directors.
Staggered
Board; Removal of Directors
Our restated certificate of incorporation and our second amended
and restated bylaws divide our board of directors into three
classes with staggered three-year terms. In addition, a director
may be removed only for cause and only by the affirmative vote
of the holders of at least two-thirds of the voting power of our
outstanding common stock. Any vacancy on our board of directors,
including a vacancy resulting from an enlargement of our board
of directors, may be filled only by vote of a majority of our
directors then in office.
The classification of our board of directors and the limitations
on the removal of directors and filling of vacancies could make
it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or discourage a
third party from seeking to acquire, control of our company.
Stockholder
Action by Written Consent; Special Meetings
Our restated certificate of incorporation provides that any
action required or permitted to be taken by our stockholders
must be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting of
such holders and may not be effected by any consent in writing
by such holders. Our restated certificate of incorporation and
our second amended and restated bylaws also provide that, except
as otherwise required by law, special meetings of our
stockholders can only be called by our chairman of the board of
directors, our chief executive officer or our board of directors.
Advance
Notice Requirements for Stockholder Proposals
Our second amended and restated bylaws establish an advance
notice procedure for stockholder proposals to be brought before
an annual meeting of stockholders, including proposed
nominations of persons for election to the board of directors.
Stockholders at an annual meeting may only consider proposals or
nominations specified in the notice of meeting or brought before
the meeting by or at the direction of the board of directors or
by a stockholder, who is entitled to vote at the meeting, has
delivered timely written notice in proper form to our secretary
of the stockholder’s intention to bring such business
before the meeting and is a stockholder of record on both the
date such notice is given to the secretary and on the record
date for the meeting. These provisions could have the effect of
delaying until the next stockholder meeting stockholder actions
that are favored by the holders of a majority of our outstanding
voting securities.
Delaware
Business Combination Statute
We are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law. Subject to certain exceptions, Section 203
prevents a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in a
“business combination” with any “interested
stockholder” for three years following the date that the
person became an interested stockholder, unless the interested
stockholder attained such status with the approval of our board
of directors or unless the business combination is approved in a
prescribed manner. A “business combination” includes,
among other things, a merger or consolidation involving us and
the “interested stockholder” and the sale of more than
10% of our assets. In general, an “interested
stockholder” is any entity or person beneficially
The Delaware General Corporation Law provides generally that the
affirmative vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on
any matter is required to amend a corporation’s certificate
of incorporation or bylaws, unless a corporation’s
certificate of incorporation or bylaws, as the case may be,
requires a greater percentage. Our second amended and restated
bylaws may be amended or repealed by a majority vote of our
board of directors or by the affirmative vote of the holders of
at least two-thirds of the votes which all our stockholders
would be entitled to cast in any election of directors. In
addition, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least
two-thirds of the votes which all our stockholders would be
entitled to cast in any election of directors is required to
amend or repeal or to adopt any provisions inconsistent with any
of the provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation
described above under “—Staggered Board; Removal of
Directors” and “—Stockholder Action by Written
Consent; Special Meetings.”
Limitation
of Liability and Indemnification of Officers and
Directors
Our restated certificate of incorporation limits the personal
liability of directors for breach of fiduciary duty to the
maximum extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation
Law. Our restated certificate of incorporation provides that no
director will have personal liability to us or to our
stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty
as a director. However, these provisions do not eliminate or
limit the liability of any of our directors:
•
for any breach of their duty of loyalty to us or our
stockholders;
•
for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
•
for voting or assenting to unlawful payments of dividends or
other distributions; or
•
for any transaction from which the director derived an improper
personal benefit.
Any amendment to or repeal of these provisions will not
eliminate or reduce the effect of these provisions in respect of
any act or failure to act, or any cause of action, suit or claim
that would accrue or arise prior to any amendment or repeal or
adoption of an inconsistent provision. If the Delaware General
Corporation Law is amended to provide for further limitations on
the personal liability of directors of corporations, then the
personal liability of our directors will be further limited to
the greatest extent permitted by the Delaware General
Corporation Law.
In addition, our restated certificate of incorporation provides
that we must indemnify our directors and officers and we must
advance expenses, including attorneys’ fees, to our
directors and officers in connection with legal proceedings,
subject to limited exceptions.
Authorized
but Unissued Shares
The authorized but unissued shares of common stock and preferred
stock are available for future issuance without stockholder
approval, subject to any limitations imposed by the listing
standards of the Nasdaq Global Market. These additional shares
may be used for a variety of corporate finance transactions,
acquisitions and employee benefit plans. The existence of
authorized but unissued and unreserved common stock and
preferred stock could make it more difficult or discourage an
attempt to obtain control of us by means of a proxy contest,
tender offer, merger or otherwise.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company.
Nasdaq
Global Market
Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Market under the
symbol “CTCT.”
Future sales of significant amounts of our common stock,
including shares issued upon exercise of outstanding options or
in the public market, or the anticipation of those sales, could
adversely affect public market prices prevailing from time to
time and could impair our ability to raise capital through sales
of our equity securities. Our common stock is listed on the
Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “CTCT.”
Based on shares outstanding as of December 31, 2007, upon
completion of this offering, we will have outstanding
27,701,582 shares of common stock, assuming the acquisition
of 1,159 shares of common stock upon the exercise of stock
options by certain selling stockholders in connection with this
offering, no exercise of any other outstanding options or
warrant and no exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment
option. Of these shares, 19,908,471 will be “restricted
securities” as that term is defined in Rule 144 under
the Securities Act. Certain of these restricted securities will
be subject to the
lock-up
agreements described below. After the expiration of the
lock-up
agreements, these restricted securities may be sold in the
public market only if registered or if they qualify for an
exemption from registration under Rule 144 or 701 under the
Securities Act.
In addition, of the 2,199,463 shares of our common stock
that were subject to stock options outstanding as of
December 31, 2007, options to purchase 572,019 shares
of common stock were vested as of December 31, 2007 and
will be eligible for sale following this offering (both after
giving effect to the issuance by us of 1,159 shares of
common stock upon the exercise of options by certain selling
stockholders).
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144 under the Securities Act of
1933, as in effect on the date of this prospectus, a person who
is not one of our affiliates at any time during the three months
preceding a sale, and who has beneficially owned shares of our
common stock for at least six months, would be entitled to sell
an unlimited number of such shares of common stock beneficially
owned for at least six months provided current public
information about us is available and, for shares beneficially
owned at least one year, an unlimited number of such shares of
common stock beneficially owned at least one year without
restriction. Our affiliates who have beneficially owned shares
of our common stock for at least six months are entitled to sell
within any three-month period a number of shares that does not
exceed the greater of:
•
1% of the number of shares of our common stock then outstanding,
which will equal approximately 276,170 shares immediately
after this offering, based on the number of shares of our common
stock outstanding as of December 31, 2007; or
•
the average weekly trading volume of our common stock on the
Nasdaq Global Market during the four calendar weeks preceding
the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to the sale.
Sales under Rule 144 by our affiliates are also subject to
manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the
availability of current public information about us.
Rule 701
In general, under Rule 701 of the Securities Act, any of
our directors, employees, consultants or advisors who purchased
shares from us in connection with a qualified compensatory stock
plan or other written agreement is eligible to resell those
shares in reliance on Rule 144, but without compliance with
the various restrictions of Rule 144, including the holding
period contained in Rule 144, and, in the case of
non-affiliates, without the availability of current public
information.
Lock-up
Agreements
Our officers, directors and certain other stockholders
representing 12,586,739 shares of our common stock have
agreed that, subject to certain exceptions, without the prior
written consent of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.
and Thomas Weisel Partners LLC, as representatives of the
underwriters, they will not during the period ending
90 days after the date of this prospectus (subject to
extension in specified circumstances), directly or indirectly:
•
offer, pledge, assign, encumber, announce the intention to sell,
sell, contract to sell, sell any option or contract to purchase,
purchase any option or contract to sell, grant any option, right
or warrant to purchase, lend, or otherwise transfer or dispose
of, any shares of our common stock or any securities directly or
indirectly convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for
shares of our common stock, whether now owned or hereafter
acquired; or
•
enter into any swap or other agreement or arrangement that
transfers, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences
of ownership of shares of our common stock.
The 90-day
restricted period will be automatically extended in the
following circumstances: (1) during the last 17 days
of the
90-day
restricted period, if we issue an earnings release or material
news or a material event occurs, the restrictions described in
the preceding paragraph will continue to apply until the
expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the
occurrence of the material news or material event; or
(2) prior to the expiration of the
90-day
restricted period, if we announce that we will release earnings
results during the
16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
90-day
period, the restrictions described in the preceding paragraph
will continue to apply until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release.
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. and Thomas Weisel Partners LLC
currently do not anticipate shortening or waiving any of the
lock-up
agreements and do not have any pre-established conditions for
such modifications or waivers. Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. and
Thomas Weisel Partners LLC may, however, release for sale in the
public market all or any portion of the shares subject to the
lock-up
agreements.
Stock
Plans
As of December 31, 2007, we had outstanding options to
purchase 2,199,463 shares of common stock, of which options
to purchase 572,019 shares of common stock were exercisable
as of December 31, 2007 (both after giving effect to the
issuance by us of 1,159 shares of common stock upon the exercise
of options by certain selling stockholders). We have filed
registration statements on
Form S-8
under the Securities Act to register all of the shares of common
stock subject to outstanding options and options and other
awards issuable pursuant to our equity plans.
We and the selling stockholders have entered into an
underwriting agreement with the underwriters named below.
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. and Thomas Weisel Partners LLC are
acting as representatives of the underwriters.
The underwriting agreement provides for the purchase of a
specific number of shares of our common stock by each of the
underwriters. The underwriters’ obligations are several,
which means that each underwriter is required to purchase a
specified number of shares, but is not responsible for the
commitment of any other underwriter to purchase shares. Subject
to the terms and conditions of the underwriting agreement, each
underwriter has severally agreed to purchase the number of
shares of our common stock set forth opposite its name below:
Underwriter
Number of Shares
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.
Thomas Weisel Partners LLC
William Blair & Company, L.L.C.
Cowen and Company, LLC
Needham & Company, LLC
Total
The underwriters have agreed to purchase all of the shares of
our common stock offered by this prospectus (other than those
covered by the over-allotment option described below) if any are
purchased. Under the underwriting agreement, if an underwriter
defaults in its commitment to purchase shares of our common
stock, the commitments of non-defaulting underwriters may be
increased or the underwriting agreement may be terminated,
depending on the circumstances.
The shares of our common stock should be ready for delivery on
or
about ,
2008 against payment in immediately available funds. The
underwriters are offering the shares subject to various
conditions and may reject all or part of any order. The
representatives have advised us and the selling stockholders
that the underwriters propose to offer the shares directly to
the public at the public offering price that appears on the
cover page of this prospectus. In addition, the representatives
may offer some of the shares to other securities dealers at such
price less a concession of $ per
share. The underwriters may also allow, and such dealers may
reallow, a concession not in excess of
$ per share to other dealers.
After the shares are released for sale to the public, the
representatives may change the offering price and other selling
terms at various times.
We and the selling stockholders have granted the underwriters an
over-allotment option. This option, which is exercisable for up
to 30 days after the date of this prospectus, permits the
underwriters to purchase a maximum of 681,000 additional shares
of our common stock (231,056 from us and 449,944 from the
selling stockholders) to cover over-allotments. If the
underwriters exercise all or part of this option, they will
purchase shares covered by the option at the public offering
price that appears on the cover page of this prospectus, less
the underwriting discount. If this option is exercised in full,
the total price to the public will be
$ , the total proceeds to us will
be $ and the total proceeds to the
selling stockholders will be $ .
The underwriters have severally agreed that, to the extent the
over-allotment option is exercised, they will each purchase a
number of additional shares proportionate to the
underwriter’s initial amount reflected in the foregoing
table.
The following table provides information regarding the amount of
the discount to be paid to the underwriters by us and the
selling stockholders:
We estimate that our total expenses of this offering, excluding
the underwriting discount, will be approximately $625,000.
We and the selling stockholders have agreed to indemnify the
underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities
under the Securities Act of 1933; provided that Hudson has
agreed to provide an additional indemnity to the underwriters
with respect to the shares being sold by Hudson Management
Associates LLC as escrow agent for the benefit of the U.S. Small
Business Administration, one of the selling stockholders.
We, our officers and directors and certain other stockholders
have agreed to a
90-day
“lock up” with respect to shares of our common stock
and other of our securities that they beneficially own,
including securities that are convertible into shares of common
stock and securities that are exchangeable or exercisable for
shares of common stock. This means that (subject to certain
exceptions), without the prior written consent of Oppenheimer
& Co. Inc. and Thomas Weisel Partners LLC, for a period of
90 days following the date of this prospectus, we and such
persons may not (x) offer, pledge, assign, encumber,
announce the intention to sell, sell, contract to sell, sell any
option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract
to sell, grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, lend,
or otherwise transfer or dispose of these securities, or
(y) enter into any swap or other agreement or arrangement
that transfers, in whole or in part, any of the economic
consequences of ownership of shares of common stock, whether any
such transaction is to be settled by delivery of shares of our
common stock or such other securities. In addition, the
lock-up
period may be extended in the event that we issue an release
earnings or announce certain material news or a material event
with respect to us occurs during the last 17 days of the
lock-up
period, or prior to the expiration of the
lock-up
period, we announce that we will release earnings results during
the 16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
lock-up
period.
Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Market under the
symbol “CTCT.”
Rules of the SEC may limit the ability of the underwriters to
bid for or purchase shares before the distribution of the shares
is completed. However, the underwriters may engage in the
following activities in accordance with the rules:
•
Stabilizing transactions—The representatives may make bids
or purchases for the purpose of pegging, fixing or maintaining
the price of the shares, so long as stabilizing bids do not
exceed a specified maximum.
•
Over-allotments and syndicate covering transactions—The
underwriters may sell more shares of our common stock in
connection with this offering than the number of shares than
they have committed to purchase. This over-allotment creates a
short position for the underwriters. This short sales position
may involve either “covered” short sales or
“naked” short sales. Covered short sales are short
sales made in an amount not greater than the underwriters’
over-allotment option to purchase additional shares in this
offering described above. The underwriters may close out any
covered short position either by exercising their over-allotment
option or by purchasing shares in the open market. To determine
how they will close the covered short position, the underwriters
will consider, among other things, the price of shares available
for purchase in the open market, as compared to the price at
which they may purchase shares through the over-allotment
option. Naked short sales are short sales in excess of the
over-allotment option. The underwriters must close out any naked
short position by purchasing shares in the open market. A naked
short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters
are concerned that, in the open market after pricing, there may
be downward pressure on the price of the shares that could
adversely affect investors who purchase shares in this offering.
•
Penalty bids—If the representatives purchase shares in the
open market in a stabilizing transaction or syndicate covering
transaction, they may reclaim a selling concession from the
underwriters and selling group members who sold those shares as
part of this offering.
•
Passive market making—Market makers in the shares who are
underwriters or prospective underwriters may make bids for or
purchases of shares subject to limitation until the time, if
ever, at which a stabilizing bid is made.
Similar to other purchase transactions, the underwriters’
purchases to cover the syndicate short sales or to stabilize the
market price of our common stock may have the effect of raising
or maintaining the market price of our common stock or
preventing or mitigating a decline in the market price of our
common stock. As a result, the price of the shares of our common
stock may be higher than the price that might otherwise exist in
the open market. The imposition of a penalty bid might also have
an effect on the price of the shares if it discourages resales
of the shares.
Neither we nor the underwriters makes any representation or
prediction as to the effect that the transactions described
above may have on the price of the shares. These transactions
may occur on the Nasdaq Global Market or otherwise. If such
transactions are commenced, they may be discontinued without
notice at any time.
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on
websites or through other online services maintained by one or
more of the underwriters or by their affiliates. In those cases,
prospective investors may view offering terms online and,
depending upon the particular underwriter, prospective investors
may be allowed to place orders online. The underwriters may
agree to allocate a specific number of shares to online
brokerage account holders. Any such allocation for online
distributions will be made by the representative on the same
basis as other allocations.
Other than the prospectus in electronic format, the information
on any underwriter’s website and any information on any
other website maintained by an underwriter is not part of the
prospectus or the registration statement of which the prospectus
in electronic format forms a part, has not been approved
and/or
endorsed by us or any underwriter or selling stockholder in its
capacity as underwriter or selling stockholder and should not be
relied upon by investors.
Mark Goodman, Managing Director, Head of Consumer and Business
Services Group of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., a co-managing
underwriter of this offering, is the brother of Gail F. Goodman.
Ms. Goodman is our Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer
and the beneficial holder of more than 4.46% of our voting
securities.
Certain of the underwriters or their affiliates have, from time
to time, provided, and may in the future provide investment and
commercial banking and financial advisory services to us, for
which they received or may receive customary fees and
commissions. In particular, all of the underwriters acted as
lead-managers or co-managers in connection with our initial
public offering.
Belgium
In Belgium, the offering is exclusively conducted under
applicable private placement exemptions of the Belgium
securities laws and therefore it has not been and will not be
notified to, and this document or any other offering material
relating to the securities has not been and will not be approved
by, the Belgian Banking, Finance and Insurance Commission
(“Commission bancaire, financière et des
assurances/Commissie voor het Bank-Financie-en
Assurantiewezen”). Any representation to the contrary is
unlawful.
Each underwriter has undertaken not to offer sell, resell,
transfer or deliver directly or indirectly, any securities, or
to take any steps relating/ancillary thereto, and not to
distribute or publish this document or any other material
relating to the securities or to the offering in a manner which
would be construed as: (a) a public offering under the
Belgian Royal Decree of 7 July 1999 on the public character
of financial transactions; or (b) an offering of securities
to the public under Directive 2003/71/EC which triggers an
obligation to publish a prospectus in Belgium. Any action
contrary to these restrictions will cause the recipient and us
to be in violation of the Belgian securities laws.
France
Neither this prospectus nor any other offering material relating
to the securities has been submitted to the clearance procedures
of the Autorité des marchés financiers in
France. The securities have not been offered or sold and will
not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, to the public in
France. Neither this prospectus nor
any other offering material relating to the securities has been
or will be: (a) released, issued, distributed or caused to
be released, issued or distributed to the public in France; or
(b) used in connection with any offer for subscription or
sale of the securities to the public in France. Such offers,
sales and distributions will be made in France only: (i) to
qualified investors (investisseurs qualifiés)
and/or to a
restricted circle of investors (cercle restreint
d’investisseurs), in each case investing for their own
account, all as defined in and in accordance with
Articles L.411-2,
D.411-1, D.411-2, D.734-1, D.744-1, D.754-1 and D.764-1 of the
French Code monétaire et financier; (ii) to
investment services providers authorised to engage in portfolio
management on behalf of third parties; or (iii) in a
transaction that, in accordance with
article L.411-2-II-1°-or-2°-or
3° of the French Code monétaire et financier
and
article 211-2
of the General Regulations (Règlement
Général) of the Autorité des marchés
financiers, does not constitute a public offer (appel
public à l’épargne). Such securities may be
resold only in compliance with
Articles L.411-1,
L.411-2, L.412-1 and L.621-8 through L.621-8-3 of the French
Code monétaire et financier.
United
Kingdom/Germany/Norway/The Netherlands
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area
which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a
“Relevant Member State”) an offer to the public of any
securities which are the subject of the offering contemplated by
this prospectus may not be made in that Relevant Member State
other than the offers contemplated in this prospectus in the
United Kingdom, Germany, Norway and the Netherlands where
prospectus will be approved or passported for the purposes of a
non-exempt offer once this prospectus has been approved by the
competent authority in such Member State and published and
passported in accordance with the Prospectus Directive as
implemented in the United Kingdom, Germany, Norway and the
Netherlands except that an offer to the public in that Relevant
Member State of any securities may be made at any time under the
following exemptions under the Prospectus Directive, if they
have been implemented in that Relevant Member State:
•
to legal entities which are authorised or regulated to operate
in the financial markets or, if not so authorised or regulated,
whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in securities;
•
to any legal entity which has two or more of (1) an average
of at least 250 employees during the last financial year;
(2) a total balance sheet of more than €43,000,000 and
(3) an annual net turnover of more than €50,000,000,
as shown in its last annual or consolidated accounts;
•
by the managers to fewer than 100 natural or legal persons
(other than qualified investors as defined in the Prospectus
Directive) subject to obtaining the prior consent of Oppenheimer
Co. Inc. and Thomas Weisel Partners LLC for any such
offer; or
•
in any other circumstances falling within Article 3(2) of
the Prospectus Directive,
provided that no such offer of securities shall result in a
requirement for the publication by us or any manager of a
prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus
Directive.
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an
“offer to the public” in relation to any securities in
any Relevant Member State means the communication in any form
and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the
offer and any securities to be offered so as to enable an
investor to decide to purchase any securities, as the same may
be varied in that Member State by any measure implementing the
Prospectus Directive in that Member State and the expression
“Prospectus Directive” means Directive 2003/71/EC and
includes any relevant implementing measure in each Relevant
Member State.
Each underwriter has represented, warranted and agreed that:
•
it has only communicated or caused to be communicated and will
only communicate or cause to be communicated any invitation or
inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning
of Section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000 (the FSMA)) received by it in connection with the issue or
sale of any securities in circumstances in which
Section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply to us; and
it has complied with and will comply with all applicable
provisions of the FSMA with respect to anything done by it in
relation to the securities in, from or otherwise involving the
United Kingdom.
Israel
In the State of Israel, the securities offered hereby may not be
offered to any person or entity other than the following:
•
a fund for joint investments in trust (i.e., mutual fund), as
such term is defined in the Law for Joint Investments in Trust,
5754-1994, or a management company of such a fund;
•
a provident fund as defined in Section 47(a)(2) of the
Income Tax Ordinance of the State of Israel, or a management
company of such a fund;
•
an insurer, as defined in the Law for Oversight of Insurance
Transactions, 5741-1981, (d) a banking entity or satellite
entity, as such terms are defined in the Banking Law
(Licensing), 5741-1981, other than a joint services company,
acting for their own account or for the account of investors of
the type listed in Section 15A(b) of the Securities Law
1968;
•
a company that is licensed as a portfolio manager, as such term
is defined in Section 8(b) of the Law for the Regulation of
Investment Advisors and Portfolio Managers,
5755-1995,
acting on its own account or for the account of investors of the
type listed in Section 15A(b) of the Securities Law 1968;
•
a company that is licensed as an investment advisor, as such
term is defined in Section 7(c) of the Law for the
Regulation of Investment Advisors and Portfolio Managers,
5755-1995,
acting on its own account;
•
a company that is a member of the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange,
acting on its own account or for the account of investors of the
type listed in Section 15A(b) of the Securities Law 1968;
•
an underwriter fulfilling the conditions of Section 56(c)
of the Securities Law,
5728-1968;
•
a venture capital fund (defined as an entity primarily involved
in investments in companies which, at the time of investment,
(i) are primarily engaged in research and development or
manufacture of new technological products or processes and
(ii) involve above-average risk);
•
an entity primarily engaged in capital markets activities in
which all of the equity owners meet one or more of the above
criteria; and
•
an entity, other than an entity formed for the purpose of
purchasing securities in this offering, in which the
shareholders equity (including pursuant to foreign accounting
rules, international accounting regulations and
U.S. generally accepted accounting rules, as defined in the
Securities Law Regulations (Preparation of Annual Financial
Statements), 1993) is in excess of NIS 250 million.
Any offeree of the securities offered hereby in the State of
Israel shall be required to submit written confirmation that it
falls within the scope of one of the above criteria. This
prospectus will not be distributed or directed to investors in
the State of Israel who do not fall within one of the above
criteria.
Italy
The offering of the securities offered hereby in Italy has not
been registered with the Commissione Nazionale per la
Società e la Borsa (“CONSOB”) pursuant to Italian
securities legislation and, accordingly, the securities offered
hereby cannot be offered, sold or delivered in the Republic of
Italy (“Italy”) nor may any copy of this prospectus or
any other document relating to the securities offered hereby be
distributed in Italy other than to professional investors
(operatori qualificati) as defined in Article 31, second
paragraph, of CONSOB Regulation No. 11522 of
1 July, 1998 as subsequently amended. Any offer, sale or
delivery of the securities
offered hereby or distribution of copies of this prospectus or
any other document relating to the securities offered hereby in
Italy must be made:
•
by an investment firm, bank or intermediary permitted to conduct
such activities in Italy in accordance with Legislative Decree
No. 58 of 24 February 1998 and Legislative Decree
No. 385 of 1 September 1993 (the “Banking
Act”);
•
in compliance with Article 129 of the Banking Act and the
implementing guidelines of the Bank of Italy; and
•
in compliance with any other applicable laws and regulations and
other possible requirements or limitations which may be imposed
by Italian authorities.
Sweden
This prospectus has not been nor will it be registered with or
approved by Finansinspektionen (the Swedish Financial
Supervisory Authority). Accordingly, this prospectus may not be
made available, nor may the securities offered hereunder be
marketed and offered for sale in Sweden, other than under
circumstances which are deemed not to require a prospectus under
the Financial Instruments Trading Act (1991: 980). This offering
will only be made to qualified investors in Sweden. This
offering will be made to no more than 100 persons or
entities in Sweden.
Switzerland
The securities offered pursuant to this prospectus will not be
offered, directly or indirectly, to the public in Switzerland
and this prospectus does not constitute a public offering
prospectus as that term is understood pursuant to art. 652a or
art. 1156 of the Swiss Federal Code of Obligations. We have not
applied for a listing of the securities being offered pursuant
to this prospectus on the SWX Swiss Exchange or on any other
regulated securities market, and consequently, the information
presented in this prospectus does not necessarily comply with
the information standards set out in the relevant listing rules.
The securities being offered pursuant to this prospectus have
not been registered with the Swiss Federal Banking Commission as
foreign investment funds, and the investor protection afforded
to acquirers of investment fund certificates does not extend to
acquirers of securities.
Investors are advised to contact their legal, financial or tax
advisers to obtain an independent assessment of the financial
and tax consequences of an investment in securities.
The validity of the common stock we are offering will be passed
upon by Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston,
Massachusetts. Bingham McCutchen LLP, Boston, Massachusetts, is
counsel for the underwriters in connection with this offering.
The consolidated financial statements as of December 31,2006 and December 31, 2007 and for each of the two years
ended December 31, 2007 included in this prospectus have
been so included in reliance on the report of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts
in auditing and accounting.
The statements of operations, changes in redeemable convertible
preferred stock and stockholders’ equity (deficit) and
comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 2005 included herein, have been audited by
Vitale, Caturano & Company, Ltd., an independent
registered public accounting firm, as indicated in their report
with respect thereto, and are included herein in reliance upon
the authority of said firm as experts in giving said reports.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and
the related consolidated statements of operations, of changes in
redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholder’s
equity (deficit) and comprehensive loss and of cash flows
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of Constant Contact, Inc. and its subsidiary (the
“Company”) at December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
two years in the period ended December 31, 2007 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these
statements in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts
for uncertain tax positions in 2007.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts
for stock-based compensation in 2006.
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Constant Contact, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying statements of operations, of
changes in redeemable convertible preferred stock and
stockholders’ equity (deficit) and comprehensive loss, and
of cash flows of Constant Contact, Inc. (the Company) for the
year ended December 31, 2005. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal
controls over financial reporting. Our audit included
consideration of internal controls over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such
opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the results of
operations and cash flows of Constant Contact, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2005 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$3 and $11 as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively
41
62
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
411
1,701
Total current assets
13,242
103,298
Property and equipment, net
4,957
7,986
Restricted cash
266
308
Other assets
16
253
Total assets
$
18,481
$
111,845
LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities
Accounts payable
$
2,576
$
3,858
Accrued expenses
2,406
3,279
Deferred revenue
5,476
10,354
Redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant
628
–
Current portion of notes payable
449
–
Total current liabilities
11,535
17,491
Notes payable, net of current portion
253
–
Total liabilities
11,788
17,491
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Redeemable convertible preferred stock
Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock,
$0.01 par value; 1,026,680 shares authorized and
outstanding at December 31, 2006; 0 shares authorized
and outstanding at December 31, 2007
14,049
–
Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock,
$0.01 par value; 9,761,666 shares authorized and
9,641,666 shares outstanding at December 31, 2006;
0 shares authorized and outstanding at December 31,2007
6,376
–
Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock,
$0.01 par value; 2,521,432 shares authorized and
outstanding at December 31, 2006; 0 shares authorized
and outstanding at December 31, 2007
14,897
–
Total redeemable convertible preferred stock
35,322
–
Stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Preferred stock; $0.01 par value; 0 and
5,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2006 and
2007, respectively; no shares issued or outstanding
–
–
Common stock; $0.01 par value; 20,000,000 and
100,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2006 and
2007, respectively; 3,788,944 and 27,617,014 shares issued
and outstanding as of December 31, 2006 and 2007,
respectively
38
276
Additional paid-in capital
5,835
136,832
Accumulated other comprehensive income
–
2
Accumulated deficit
(34,502
)
(42,756
)
Total stockholders’ (deficit) equity
(28,629
)
94,354
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and
stockholders’ (deficit) equity
$
18,481
$
111,845
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
1.
Nature of
the Business
Constant Contact, Inc. (the “Company”) was
incorporated as a Massachusetts corporation on August 25,1995. The Company reincorporated in the State of Delaware in
2000. The Company is a leading provider of on-demand email
marketing and online survey products to small organizations,
including small businesses, associations and nonprofits located
primarily in the U.S. The Company’s email marketing
product allows customers to create, send and track email
marketing campaigns. The Company’s online survey product
enables customers to survey their customers, clients or members
and analyze the responses. These products are designed and
priced for small organizations and are marketed directly by the
Company and through a wide variety of channel partners. The
Company was originally incorporated under the name Roving
Software Incorporated and subsequently began doing business
under the trade name Constant Contact in 2004. In 2006, the
Company changed its name to Constant Contact, Inc.
2.
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis
of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include those
of the Company and its subsidiary, Constant Contact Securities
Corporation, after elimination of all intercompany accounts and
transactions. The accompanying consolidated financial statements
have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates
these estimates and judgments, including those related to
revenue recognition, stock-based compensation and income taxes.
The Company bases these estimates on historical and anticipated
results and trends and on various other assumptions that the
Company believes are reasonable under the circumstances,
including assumptions as to future events. These estimates form
the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities and recorded revenue and expenses that
are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results
could differ from these estimates.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with
original maturities of three months or less at the time of
acquisition to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated
at cost, which approximates fair value.
Marketable
Securities
The Company follows the guidance provided in Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities, in determining the classification of and
accounting for its marketable securities. The Company’s
marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and
are carried at fair value with the unrealized gains and losses,
net of tax, reported as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. Realized
gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other than
temporary are included as a component of interest income based
on the specific identification method. Fair value is determined
based on quoted market prices.
All marketable securities had remaining maturities of less than
one year as of December 31, 2007. At December 31,2006, marketable securities consisted of corporate notes and
obligations with an aggregate fair
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
value of $4,004, and $0 unrealized gains or losses. At
December 31, 2007, marketable securities consisted of
commercial paper and corporate notes and obligations with an
aggregate fair value of $4,484 and $2 of net unrealized gains.
Accounts
Receivable
Management reviews accounts receivable on a periodic basis to
determine if any receivables will potentially be uncollectible.
The Company reserves for receivables that are determined to be
uncollectible, if any, in its allowance for doubtful accounts.
After the Company has exhausted all collection efforts, the
outstanding receivable is written off against the allowance.
Concentration
of Credit Risk and Significant Customers
Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash
equivalents and short-term marketable securities. At
December 31, 2006 and 2007, the Company had substantially
all cash balances at certain financial institutions in excess of
federally insured limits. The Company maintains its cash
balances and custody of its marketable securities with
accredited financial institutions.
For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, there
were no customers that accounted for more than 10% of total
revenue.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated
using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of
the assets or, where applicable and if shorter, over the lease
term. Upon retirement or sale, the cost of assets disposed of
and the related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the
accounts and any resulting gain or loss is credited or charged
to other income. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as
incurred.
Estimated useful lives of assets are as follows:
Computer equipment
3 years
Software
3 years
Furniture and fixtures
5 years
Leasehold improvements
Shorter of life of lease or
estimated useful life
Long-Lived
Assets
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the Company
reviews the carrying values of its long-lived assets for
possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstance
indicate that the related carrying amount may not be
recoverable. Undiscounted cash flows are compared to the
carrying value and when required, impairment losses on assets to
be held and used are recognized based on the excess of the
asset’s carrying amount over the fair value of the asset.
Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of
carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.
Revenue
Recognition
The Company provides access to its products through
month-to-month subscription arrangements whereby the customer is
charged a fee. Subscription arrangements include access to use
the Company’s software via the internet and support
services such as telephone support. The Company follows the
guidance of Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting
Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 104, Revenue Recognition
in Financial
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Statements, and Emerging Issues Task Force
(“EITF”) Issue
No. 00-03,
Application of AICPA Statement of Position
97-2 to
Arrangements that include the Right to Use Software Stored on
Another Entity’s Hardware, which applies when customers
do not have the right to take possession of the software and use
it on another entity’s hardware. When there is evidence of
an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable and
collectibility is deemed probable, the Company recognizes
revenue on a daily basis over the subscription term as the
services are delivered.
The Company also offers professional services to its customers
primarily for the design of custom email templates and training.
Professional services revenue is accounted for separate from
subscription revenue based on the guidance of
EITF Issue No. 00-21,
Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple
Deliverables, as those services have value on a standalone
basis and do not involve a significant degree of risk or unique
acceptance criteria and as the fair value of the Company’s
subscription services is evidenced by their availability on a
standalone basis. Professional services revenue is recognized as
the services are performed.
Deferred
Revenue
Deferred revenue primarily consists of payments received in
advance of revenue recognition of the Company’s on-demand
products described above and is recognized as the revenue
recognition criteria are met. The Company’s customers pay
for services in advance on a monthly, semiannual or annual basis.
The Company follows the guidance of Statement of Position
(“SOP”)
No. 98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use and EITF Issue No.
00-02,
Accounting for Web Site Development Costs, in accounting
for the development costs of its on-demand products and website
development costs. The costs incurred in the preliminary stages
of development are expensed as incurred. Once an application has
reached the development stage, internal and external costs, if
direct and incremental, are capitalized until the software is
substantially complete and ready for its intended use.
Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant (including Change in
Accounting Principle)
On June 29, 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) issued Staff Position
150-5,
Issuer’s Accounting under FASB Statement No. 150
for Freestanding Warrants and Other Similar Instruments on
Shares that are Redeemable
(“FSP 150-5”).
FSP 150-5
affirms that warrants of this type are subject to the
requirements in SFAS No. 150, Accounting for
Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both
Liabilities and Equity (“SFAS 150”),
regardless of the redemption price or the timing of the
redemption feature. Therefore, under SFAS 150, the
freestanding warrant to purchase the Company’s redeemable
convertible preferred stock was a liability that was to be
recorded at fair value. The Company adopted
FSP 150-5
as of July 1, 2005. The effect of this adoption on the
financial statements between the date of adoption and
January 1, 2006 was immaterial. The warrant was subject to
remeasurement at each balance sheet date prior to exercise of
the warrant and the change in fair value (determined using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model) was recognized as other
expense.
Comprehensive
Loss
Comprehensive loss includes net loss, as well as other changes
in stockholders’ equity that result from transactions and
economic events other than those with stockholders. The
Company’s only element of other comprehensive income is
unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities.
The Company had no unrealized gains or losses as of
December 31, 2006 and gross unrealized gains and losses of
$3 and ($1),
The carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments,
including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair
value because of their short-term nature.
Segment
Data
The Company manages its operations as a single segment for
purposes of assessing performance and making operating
decisions. Revenue is generated predominately in the
U.S. and all significant assets are held in the U.S.
Net
Loss Attributable to Common Stockholders Per Share
Basic and diluted net loss attributable to common stockholders
per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to
common stockholders by the weighted average number of
nonrestricted common shares outstanding for the period.
The following common stock equivalents were excluded from the
computation of diluted net loss per share attributable to common
stockholders because they had an antidilutive impact:
Warrants to purchase common or redeemable convertible preferred
stock
414,262
282,223
520
Restricted shares
192,010
144,008
96,006
Redeemable convertible preferred stock
13,868,824
17,146,675
–
Total options, warrants, restricted shares and redeemable
convertible preferred stock exercisable or convertible into
common stock
15,692,862
19,274,913
2,297,148
Advertising
Expense
The Company expenses advertising as incurred. Advertising
expense was $2,618, $9,778 and $13,052 during the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation (including Change in Accounting
Principle)
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment
(“SFAS 123R”), a revision of
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (“SFAS 123”), and related
interpretations. SFAS 123R supersedes Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees (“APB 25”), and related
interpretations. SFAS 123R requires all share-based
compensation to employees, including grants of employee stock
options, to be valued at fair value on the date of grant, and to
be expensed over the applicable service period. The Company
adopted the prospective transition method which does not result
in restatement of previously issued financial statements and
requires only new awards or awards that are modified,
repurchased or canceled after the effective date to be accounted
for under the provisions of SFAS 123R. Prior to
January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
compensation arrangements according to the provisions of APB 25
and related interpretations. Pursuant to the income tax
provisions included in SFAS 123R, the Company has elected
the “short-cut method” of computing its hypothetical
pool of additional paid-in capital that is available to absorb
future tax benefit shortfalls.
Income
Taxes (including Change in Accounting Principle)
Income taxes are provided for tax effects of transactions
reported in the financial statements and consist of income taxes
currently due plus deferred income taxes related to timing
differences between the basis of certain assets and liabilities
for financial and income tax reporting. Deferred taxes are
determined based on the difference between the financial
statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted
tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are
expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided if, based
upon the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than
not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation
of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”).
FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income
taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in
accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a two-step process to
determine the amount of tax benefit to be recognized. First, the
tax position must be evaluated to determine the likelihood that
it will be sustained upon external examination. If the tax
position is deemed “more-likely-than-not” to be
sustained, the tax position is then assessed to determine the
amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The
amount of the benefit that may be recognized is the largest
amount that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized
upon ultimate settlement. The Company adopted FIN 48 on
January 1, 2007 and the adoption did not have an effect on
its results of operations and financial position.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R),
Business Combinations. SFAS 141(R) expands the
definition of a business combination and requires acquisitions
to be accounted for at fair value. These fair value provisions
will be applied to contingent consideration, in-process research
and development and acquisition contingencies. Purchase
accounting adjustments will be reflected during the period in
which an acquisition was originally recorded. Additionally, the
new standard requires transaction costs and restructuring
charges to be expensed. The guidance of SFAS 141(R) shall
be applied to the first reporting period beginning after
December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 141(R) is not
expected to have a material impact on the Company’s
financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
On February 15, 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115 (“SFAS 159”), which
permits companies to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective
of SFAS 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing
companies with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in
reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge
accounting provisions. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007. Management is
currently evaluating the effect that SFAS 159 may have on
the Company’s financial statements taken as a whole.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (“SFAS 157”), which defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. This statement does not require
any new fair value measurements; rather, it applies under other
accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements. The provisions of SFAS 157 are effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim
periods within those fiscal years. In February 2008, the FASB
issued FSP No. 157-2, Effective
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which permits delayed
application of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008,
and interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is
currently evaluating the effect that SFAS 157 may have on the
Company’s financial statements taken as a whole.
3.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment consisted of the following:
Depreciation and amortization expense was $591, $1,536 and
$2,631 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and
2007, respectively. During 2007, the Company retired and sold
assets that had a gross book value of $574 and a net book value
of $6, for proceeds of $12. The resulting gain of $6 was
recorded to other income.
The Company capitalized costs associated with the development of
internal use software of $516 and $382 and recorded related
amortization expense of $0 and $157 during the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. The remaining net
book value of capitalized software costs was $516 and $741 as of
December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
4.
Notes
Payable
In February 2003, the Company entered into a Loan and Security
Agreement (the “Agreement”) with a financial
institution, which provided for a $350 term loan for the
acquisition of property and equipment. From the period of August
2003 through September 2005, the Company amended the Agreement
five times in order to increase the amount available to borrow
to $2,175 and to add and amend various terms and covenants. In
March 2007, the Company amended the agreement a sixth time to
establish an additional borrowing availability of $5,000, which
amount could be drawn down through December 31, 2007, as
well as to amend and add various terms and covenants. Advances
under the Agreement were payable in thirty to thirty-six monthly
installments. The interest rate was variable based on prime plus
2%. Borrowings were collateralized by substantially all of the
assets of the Company. In October 2007, the Company used
approximately $2,600 of proceeds from its initial public
offering to repay all outstanding debt under the term loan
facility (Note 5). No amounts remained outstanding or
available for borrowing under the term loan at December 31,2007.
In connection with entering into the Agreement in 2003, the
Company issued a warrant to purchase 520 shares of the
Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.38 per
share. The warrant was due to expire in November 2007. The value
of the warrant, estimated using the Black-Scholes pricing model,
was not material. In connection with the Loan Modification
Agreement in March 2007, the Company agreed to extend the term
of the warrant for a period of seven years from the date of the
modification. The Company estimated the incremental fair value
related to the modification of the warrant using the
Black-Scholes pricing model and determined it to be immaterial.
This warrant remained outstanding at December 31, 2007.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
5.
Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Equity
(Deficit)
Initial
Public Offering
On October 9, 2007, the Company closed its initial public
offering of 7,705,000 shares of common stock at an offering
price of $16.00 per share, of which 6,199,845 shares were
sold by the Company and 1,505,155 shares were sold by
selling stockholders, raising proceeds to the Company of
$90,436, net of underwriting discounts and offering costs. At
the close of the initial public offering, the Company’s
outstanding shares of redeemable convertible preferred stock
were automatically converted into common stock and the
Company’s charter was amended and restated to provide for
100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.01 per share, all of which preferred stock is undesignated.
Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock
During 2002, the Company authorized 1,026,680 shares and
9,761,666 shares of Series A redeemable convertible
preferred stock (“Series A”) and Series B
redeemable convertible preferred stock
(“Series B”), respectively. Also during 2002, the
Company issued 1,026,680 and 9,641,666 shares of
Series A and Series B, respectively.
During 2006, the Company authorized 2,521,432 shares of
Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock
(“Series C”). In May and July 2006, the Company
issued 2,357,130 and 164,302 shares, respectively, of
Series C for an aggregate purchase price of $15,000 or
$5.949 per share.
The holders of the redeemable convertible preferred stock that
was authorized and outstanding prior to the Company’s
initial public offering had the following rights:
Voting
The holders of the preferred stock were entitled to vote,
together with the holders of common stock, on all matters
submitted to stockholders for a vote. Each preferred stockholder
was entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of
shares of common stock into which each preferred share was
convertible at the time of such vote. The holders of
Series B and Series C were entitled to other specific
voting rights with respect to the election of directors, as
defined.
Dividends
The holders of Series B shares were entitled to receive
cumulative dividends at the rate of 10% per annum through
May 12, 2006, payable in preference and priority to any
payment of any dividend on common stock, Series A or
Series C shares. No dividends accrued after May 12,2006. No dividends were to be made with respect to the common
stock unless the holders of Series B and Series C
first received, or simultaneously received, a dividend in an
amount equivalent to that of common stock on an as converted
basis. The holders of Series A shares were not entitled to
receive dividends.
Liquidation
Preference
In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up
of the affairs of the Company, the holders of Series C were
entitled to receive an amount, to be paid first out of the
assets of the Company available for distribution to holders of
all classes of capital stock, equal to $11.898 per share
(subject to adjustment), plus any declared but unpaid dividends,
in the case of a specified liquidation event (defined as an
event in which the proceeds legally available for distribution
to the stockholders have value equal to or less than $100,000),
or $5.949 per share (subject to adjustment) plus any declared
but unpaid dividends in the case of other than a specified
liquidation event. If the assets of the Company were
insufficient to pay the full amount entitled to
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
the holders of Series C, then the entire assets of the
Company were to be distributed ratably among the holders of
Series C.
After such payments had been made in full to the holders of
Series C, the holders of Series B were entitled to
receive an amount equal to $0.50 per share (subject to
adjustment), plus any accrued but unpaid dividends. If the
assets of the Company were insufficient to pay the full amount
entitled to the holders of Series B, then the remaining
assets of the Company were to be distributed ratably among the
holders of Series B.
After such payments were made in full to the holders of
Series C and Series B, the holders of Series A
were entitled to receive an amount equal to approximately $17.00
per share (subject to adjustment). If the assets of the Company
were insufficient to pay the full amount entitled to the holders
of Series A, then the remaining assets available for such
distribution were to be distributed ratably among the holders of
Series A.
Upon completion of the distribution as described above, all of
the remaining proceeds available for distribution to
stockholders were to be distributed among the holders of
Series B and Series C and Common stock pro rata based
on number of shares of Common stock held by each (assuming full
conversion of all such preferred stock) provided that holders of
Series C would receive no further distribution if such
holders were entitled to a distribution equal to twice the
original price as stated above.
Conversion
Each share of preferred stock, at the option of the holder, was
convertible into the number of fully paid shares of common stock
as determined by dividing the respective preferred stock issue
price by the conversion price in effect at the time. The initial
conversion prices of Series A, B and C shares were $17.00,
$0.50 and $5.949, respectively, subject to adjustment in
accordance with the antidilution provisions contained in the
Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended. After
giving effect to the stock split the conversion ratio of all
outstanding preferred stock was 1.3 shares of common stock
for each share of preferred stock. Conversion was automatic
immediately upon the closing of the first underwritten public
offering in which the aggregate proceeds raised exceed $25,000
and pursuant to which the initial price to the public was at
least $9.152 per share (after giving effect to the stock split).
At the close of the initial public offering, the Company’s
outstanding shares of redeemable convertible preferred stock
were automatically converted into 17,146,697 shares of
common stock and a warrant to purchase redeemable convertible
preferred stock was exercised and converted to
156,000 shares of common stock.
Redemption
The holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the
then outstanding Series B and Series C shares (voting
together as a single class), by written request at any time
after May 12, 2010 (the “Redemption Date”),
could have required the Company to redeem the preferred stock by
paying in cash a sum equal to 100% of the original purchase
price of the Series A, Series B and Series C
preferred stock plus accrued but unpaid dividends on
Series B and declared but unpaid dividends on
Series C, in three (3) annual installments. If the
Company did not have sufficient funds legally available to
redeem all shares of preferred stock to be redeemed at the
Redemption Date, then the Company was to redeem first the
maximum possible shares of Series C ratably among the
holders of Series C. Only after all Series C shares
that were to be redeemed at the Redemption Date were
redeemed, the Company was to redeem the maximum number of
Series B shares ratably among the holders of Series B.
Only after all Series C and B shares that were to be
redeemed at the Redemption Date were redeemed, the Company
was to redeem the maximum number of Series A shares ratably
among the holders of Series A. The Company recorded
dividends and accretion through a charge to
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
stockholders’ equity (deficit) of $5,743, $3,788 and $816
in 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, in connection with the
redemption rights.
Warrants
In connection with certain equity financings, the Company
granted warrants to purchase 257,743 shares of common stock
at exercise prices ranging from $1.21-$1.38 per share. The
common stock warrants were to expire on varying dates through
October 2008, or the effective date of a merger or consolidation
of the Company with another entity or the sale of all or
substantially all of the Company’s assets. Warrants to
purchase 132,039 shares of common stock were exercised
during 2006 and warrants to purchase 125,704 shares of
common stock were outstanding at December 31, 2006. The
remaining warrants for the purchase of 125,704 shares of
common stock were exercised during the year ended
December 31, 2007.
In connection with the Series B financing, the Company
granted to a consultant a warrant to purchase
120,000 shares of Series B at a price of $0.50 per
share. The warrant was due to expire on the earliest to occur of
November 27, 2007, or immediately prior to the closing of a
merger, sale of assets, or consolidation of the Company by
another entity, or immediately prior to the closing date of an
initial public offering of the Company’s common stock. The
Company accounted for the Series B warrant in accordance
with the guidance in
FSP 150-5.
The guidance provides that warrants for shares that are
redeemable are within the scope of SFAS 150 and should be
accounted for as a liability and reported at fair value each
reporting period until exercised. At December 31, 2006, the
Company used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate
the fair value of the Series B warrant to be $628. During
2005, 2006 and 2007, the Company recorded a charge to other
expense of $0, $588 and $3,918, respectively, relating to the
changes in carrying value of the Series B warrant. As of
the close of the Company’s initial public offering, the
warrant was exercised for 120,000 shares of redeemable
convertible preferred stock which automatically converted into
156,000 shares of common stock.
Common
Stock
In August 2007, the pricing committee of the Company’s
board of directors, pursuant to delegated authority, approved a
1.3-for-1 stock split of the Company’s common stock, which
became effective in September 2007. All references to share and
per share amounts have been adjusted retroactively to reflect
the stock split.
Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote. The holders
of common stock are also entitled to receive dividends whenever
funds are legally available and when declared by the board of
directors, subject to the prior rights of holders of all classes
of preferred stock outstanding.
6.
Stock-Based
Awards
In 1999, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 1999
Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan (the “Plan”).
The Plan provided for the granting of incentive and nonqualified
stock options with a maximum term of ten years, restricted stock
and other equity awards to employees, officers, directors,
consultants and advisors of the Company. Provisions such as
vesting, repurchase and exercise conditions and limitations were
determined by the Board of Directors on the grant date. The
maximum number of shares of common stock that could be issued
pursuant to the 1999 Stock Plan was 5,604,353. In conjunction
with the adoption of the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, the board of
directors voted that no further stock options or other
equity-based awards shall be granted under the 1999 plan.
In 2007, the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (“2007 Plan”),
was adopted by the board of directors and approved by its
stockholders. The 2007 Plan permits the Company to make grants
of incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options,
restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation
rights and other stock-based awards.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
These awards may be granted to the Company’s employees,
officers, directors, consultants, and advisors. The Company
reserved 1,500,000 shares of its common stock for the
issuance under the 2007 Plan. Additionally, per the terms of the
2007 Plan, 700,000 shares of common stock previously
reserved for issuance under the 1999 plan were added to the
number of shares available for issuance under the 2007 Plan. The
2007 Plan also contains an evergreen provision that allows for
an annual increase in the number of shares available for
issuance on the first day of each year beginning in 2008 and
ending on the second day of 2017. The increase is based on a
formula and cannot exceed 700,000 shares of common stock
per year. As of December 31, 2007, 1,807,450 shares of
common stock were available for issuance under the 2007 Plan.
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for its
stock-based compensation plans under the intrinsic value
recognition and measurement provisions of APB 25 and related
interpretations, and adopted the disclosure-only provisions of
SFAS 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair
value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R. SFAS 123R
requires nonpublic companies that used the minimum value method
in SFAS 123 for either recognition or pro forma disclosures
to apply SFAS 123R using the prospective transition method.
Under the prospective transition method, compensation cost
recognized in the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
included the pro rata compensation cost for all share-based
payments granted on or subsequent to January 1, 2006, based
on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS 123R. The Company recognizes the
compensation cost of employee stock-based awards in the
statement of operations using the straight-line method over the
requisite service period of the award. The Company will continue
to apply APB 25 in future periods to equity awards outstanding
at the date of SFAS 123R’s adoption that were measured
using the minimum value method. In accordance with the
requirements of SFAS 123R, the Company does not present pro
forma disclosures for periods prior to the adoption of
SFAS 123R, as the estimated fair value of the
Company’s stock options granted through December 31,2005 was determined using the minimum value method.
Stock
Options
During the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007,
the Company granted 737,091, 749,277, and 860,296 stock options,
respectively, to certain employees and directors. The vesting of
these awards is time-based and the restrictions typically lapse
25% after one year and quarterly thereafter for the next
36 months.
Stock options have historically been granted with exercise
prices equal to the estimated fair value of the Company’s
common stock on the date of grant. Commencing in the fourth
quarter 2007, the Company based fair value on the quoted market
price of the Company’s common stock. Because there was no
public market for the Company’s common stock prior to the
initial public offering (Note 5), the Company’s board
of directors determined the fair value of common stock taking
into account the Company’s most recently available
valuation of common stock.
For the year ended December 31, 2005, the fair value of
common stock was estimated by the Company on an annual basis.
The fair value was estimated by considering a number of
objective and subjective factors, including peer group trading
multiples, the amount of preferred stock liquidation
preferences, the illiquid nature of common stock and the size of
the Company and its lack of historical profitability.
Commencing in 2006, the Company began the process of quarterly
contemporaneous common stock valuations. In the first quarter of
2006, the fair value of common stock was estimated using the
guideline public company method. The valuation considered
numerous factors, including peer group trading multiples, the
amount of preferred stock liquidation preferences, the illiquid
nature of the Company’s common stock, the Company’s
small size, lack of historical profitability, short-term cash
requirements and the redemption rights of preferred stockholders.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Beginning in the second quarter of 2006, the quarterly common
stock valuations were prepared using the probability-weighted
expected return method. Under this methodology, the fair market
value of common stock was estimated based upon an analysis of
future values for the Company assuming various outcomes. The
share value was based on the probability-weighted present value
of expected future investment returns considering each of the
possible outcomes available to the Company as well as the rights
of each share class.
The fair value of each stock option grant was estimated on the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The
expected term assumption is based on the simplified method for
estimating expected term for awards that qualify as
“plain-vanilla” options under SAB 107, Share
Based Payment. Expected volatility is based on historical
volatility of the publicly traded stock of a peer group of
companies analyzed by the Company. The risk-free interest rate
is determined by reference to U.S. Treasury yields at or
near the time of grant for time periods similar to the expected
term of the award. The relevant data used to determine the value
of the stock option grants is as follows:
The aggregate intrinsic value was calculated based on the
positive difference between the estimated fair value of the
Company’s common stock on December 31, 2007 of $21.50
per share and the exercise price of the options.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The weighted average grant-date fair value of grants of stock
options was $1.50 and $8.06 per share for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $11,
$430 and $978 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006
and 2007, respectively.
Compensation cost of $17, $83 and $645 was recognized for
employee stock-based compensation for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Under the provisions of SFAS 123R, the Company recognized
stock-based compensation expense on all employee awards in the
following categories:
No stock-based compensation expense was capitalized during the
years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 or 2007. The
unrecognized compensation expense associated with outstanding
stock options at December 31, 2007 was $7,225 which is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
3.57 years as of December 31, 2007.
Stock
Purchase Plan
The Company’s 2007 employee stock purchase plan (the
“Purchase Plan”) was adopted by the board of directors
and approved by its stockholders in September 2007 and became
effective upon the completion of the initial public offering.
The Purchase Plan will be administered by the board of directors
or by a committee appointed by the board of directors. All
employees, including directors who are employees and all
employees of participating subsidiaries, who have been employed
for at least three months prior to enrolling in the Purchase
Plan, who are employees on the first day of the Purchase Plan
period, and whose customary employment is for more than
30 hours a week and more than five months in any calendar
year, will be eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan. The
Company will make one or more offerings to employees to purchase
stock under the Purchase Plan. Offerings will begin on each of
January 1 and July 1 at which date a six-month Purchase Plan
period will commence and payroll deductions will be made and
held for the purchase of the common stock at the end of such
Purchase Plan period. The first offering commencement date will
begin on January 1, 2008. The Company reserved a total of
350,000 shares of common stock for issuance to
participating employees under the Purchase Plan.
Restricted
Stock
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company sold
192,010 shares of restricted stock to a certain employee.
The vesting of this award is time-based and restrictions lapse
over four years. The Company did not record compensation expense
as the shares were sold at fair value. At December 31, 2006
and 2007, 144,008 and 96,006 shares, respectively, remained
unvested. No shares have been forfeited.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
7.
Income
Taxes
As a result of losses incurred, the Company did not provide for
any income taxes in the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006
and 2007. A reconciliation of the Company’s effective tax
rate to the statutory federal income tax rate is as follows:
The Company has provided a valuation allowance for the full
amount of its net deferred tax assets because at
December 31, 2006 and 2007 it is not more likely than not
that any future benefit from deductible temporary differences
and net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards would be
realized. The change in valuation allowance for the year ended
December 31, 2007 of $3,611 is attributable primarily to
the increase in the net operating loss and research and
development credit carryforwards.
At December 31, 2007, the Company has federal and state net
operating loss carryforwards of approximately $38,243 and
$24,862 respectively, which expire at varying dates through 2027
for federal income tax purposes and through 2012 for state
income tax purposes. At December 31, 2007, $1,396 of
federal and state net
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
operating loss carryforwards relate to deductions for stock
option compensation for which the associated tax benefit will be
credited to additional paid-in capital when realized. This
amount is tracked separately and not included in the
Company’s deferred tax assets.
At December 31, 2007, the Company had federal and state
research and development credit carryforwards of $1,188 and
$1,156 respectively, which will expire at varying dates through
2027 for federal income tax purposes and through 2022 for state
income tax purposes.
Adoption
of FIN 48
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation
of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”).
FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income
taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in
accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a two-step process to
determine the amount of tax benefit to be recognized. First, the
tax position must be evaluated to determine the likelihood that
it will be sustained upon external examination. If the tax
position is deemed “more-likely-than-not” to be
sustained, the tax position is then assessed to determine the
amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The
amount of the benefit that may be recognized is the largest
amount that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized
upon ultimate settlement. The Company adopted FIN 48 on
January 1, 2007 and its adoption did not have an effect on
its results of operations and financial condition.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $303 as of
January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007, all of which,
if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate prior to the
adjustment for the Company’s valuation allowance. As a
result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company did not
recognize an increase in tax liability for the unrecognized tax
benefits because the Company has significant deferred tax assets
comprised primarily of net operating loss carryforwards which
would mitigate the effect of any unrecognized tax benefits.
There were no increases or decreases to the amount of
unrecognized tax benefits during 2007. Additionally, it is not
possible to estimate the potential net increase or decrease to
the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits during the next
twelve months.
The Company’s policy is to record estimated interest and
penalties related to the underpayment of income taxes as a
component of its income tax provision. As of January 1,2007 and December 31, 2007, the Company had no accrued
interest or tax penalties recorded. The Company’s income
tax return reporting periods since December 31, 2003 are
open to income tax audit examination by the federal and state
tax authorities. In addition, because the Company has net
operating loss carryforwards, the Internal Revenue Service is
permitted to audit earlier years and propose adjustments up to
the amount of net operating loss generated in those years.
The Company has performed an analysis of its changes in
ownership under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 and has
determined that any ownership changes which have occurred do not
result in a permanent limitation of the Company’s federal
and state net operating losses.
The Company has a defined contribution savings plan under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. This plan
covers substantially all employees who meet minimum age and
service requirements and allows participants to defer a portion
of their annual compensation on a pre-tax basis. Company
contributions to the plan may be made at the discretion of the
Board of Directors. There were no contributions made to the plan
by the Company during the years ended December 31, 2005,
2006 and 2007.
10.
Commitments
and Contingencies
Capital
Leases
The Company leased equipment under capital leases that expired
in 2006 (Note 3). Amortization of assets under capital
leases was $19 and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2005
and 2006, respectively.
Operating
Leases
The Company leased its office space under a noncancelable
operating lease expiring in July 2005. In June 2005, the Company
and the landlord entered into the First Amendment to the
original lease agreement which effectively terminated the
original lease related to the existing office space and entered
into a new lease agreement for new office space with a lease
term of five years from the commencement of the First Amendment
in October 2005. In July 2006, the Company subleased an adjacent
office space within the same building. Simultaneous with the
execution of the sublease, the Company entered into the Second
Amendment of its primary office lease to incorporate the
additional space, upon the expiration of the sublease, into the
primary office lease for the period from May 1, 2008 to
September 2010. In 2007, the Company entered into the third and
fourth amendments of its office lease in order to expand its
existing premises. The modified lease arrangement required a $92
increase in the security deposit. To satisfy the increased
security deposit requirement, the Company increased the letter
of credit issued for the benefit of the holder of the lease and
the related restricted cash arrangement securing the letter of
credit. The modified lease arrangement includes certain lease
incentives, payment escalations and rent holidays, the net
effect of which has been deferred and is being amortized as an
adjustment to rent expense over the term of the lease. Total
rent expense under operating leases was $351, $745 and $1,091
for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007,
respectively.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
As of December 31, 2007, future minimum lease payments
under noncancelable operating leases are as follows:
2008
$
2,041
2009
2,264
2010
1,719
$
6,024
Hosting
Services
The Company has an agreement with a vendor to provide
specialized space and related services from which the Company
hosts its software application. The agreement includes payment
commitments that expire at various dates through October 2009.
As of December 31, 2007, the agreement requires future
minimum payments of $986 and $367 in 2008 and 2009, respectively.
In 2007, the Company entered into an agreement and first
amendment to the agreement with a different vendor to provide
space and related services in a second co-location hosting
facility. As of December 31, 2007, the amended agreement
requires future minimum payments of $770, $1,542, $1,581,
$1,621, $1,661 and $774 in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and
2013, respectively.
Letters
of Credit
As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, the Company maintained a
letter of credit totaling $216 and $308, respectively, for the
benefit of the holder of the Company’s facilities lease.
The holder can draw against the letter of credit in the event of
default by the Company. The Company was required to maintain a
cash balance of at least $266 as of December 31, 2006 to
secure the letter of credit and as collateral on customer credit
card deposits and $308 as of December 31, 2007 to secure
the letter of credit. These amounts were classified as
restricted cash in the balance sheet at December 31, 2006
and 2007.
Indemnification
Obligations
The Company enters into standard indemnification agreements with
its channel partners and certain other third parties in the
ordinary course of business. Pursuant to these agreements, the
Company indemnifies and agrees to reimburse the indemnified
party for losses incurred by the indemnified party in connection
with certain intellectual property infringement claims by any
third party with respect to the Company’s business and
technology. Based on historical information and information
known as of December 31, 2007, the Company does not expect
it will incur any significant liabilities under these
indemnification agreements.
11.
Related
Party
An executive of the Company served as a director of a channel
partner and vendor to the Company from December 2003 through May
2007. In the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007,
the Company’s aggregate payments to this channel partner
and vendor for customer referrals and template design services
were $107, $164 and $36, respectively.
One of the Company’s directors is a general partner of a
venture capital firm that owns, through affiliated investment
entities, approximately 7% of the outstanding common stock of
one of the Company’s vendors. Another of the general
partners of that venture capital firm was a former member of the
board of directors of that same vendor. In the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, the Company’s
aggregate payments to this vendor were $33, $253 and $508,
respectively.
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. No dealer, salesperson or other person is authorized
to give information that is not contained in this prospectus.
This prospectus is not an offer to sell nor is it seeking an
offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the
offer or sale is not permitted. The information contained in
this prospectus is correct only as of the date of this
prospectus, regardless of the time of the delivery of this
prospectus or any sale of these securities.
The following table indicates the expenses to be incurred in
connection with the offering described in this Registration
Statement, other than underwriting discounts and commissions,
all of which will be paid by the Registrant. All amounts are
estimated except the Securities and Exchange Commission
registration fee and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
filing fee.
Amount
Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee
$
3,546
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority fee
9,520
Accountants’ fees and expenses
175,000
Legal fees and expenses
250,000
Blue Sky fees and expenses
10,000
Transfer Agent’s fees and expenses
5,000
Printing and engraving expenses
100,000
Miscellaneous
71,935
Total Expenses
$
625,000
Item 14.
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers
Section 102 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware permits a corporation to eliminate the personal
liability of directors of a corporation to the corporation or
its stockholders for monetary damages for a breach of fiduciary
duty as a director, except where the director breached his duty
of loyalty, failed to act in good faith, engaged in intentional
misconduct or knowingly violated a law, authorized the payment
of a dividend or approved a stock repurchase in violation of
Delaware corporate law or obtained an improper personal benefit.
Our restated certificate of incorporation provides that no
director of the Registrant shall be personally liable to it or
its stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of
fiduciary duty as a director, notwithstanding any provision of
law imposing such liability, except to the extent that the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware prohibits the
elimination or limitation of liability of directors for breaches
of fiduciary duty.
Section 145 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware provides that a corporation has the power to indemnify
a director, officer, employee, or agent of the corporation, or a
person serving at the request of the corporation for another
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise in related capacities against expenses (including
attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in
settlements actually and reasonably incurred by the person in
connection with an action, suit or proceeding to which he was or
is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any
threatened, ending or completed action, suit or proceeding by
reason of such position, if such person acted in good faith and
in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to
the best interests of the corporation, and, in any criminal
action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his
conduct was unlawful, except that, in the case of actions
brought by or in the right of the corporation, no
indemnification shall be made with respect to any claim, issue
or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be
liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the
Court of Chancery or other adjudicating court determines that,
despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all of the
circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably
entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the Court of
Chancery or such other court shall deem proper.
Our restated certificate of incorporation provides that we will
indemnify each person who was or is a party or threatened to be
made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action,
suit or proceeding (other than an action by or in the right of
Constant Contact) by reason of the fact that he or she is or
was, or has agreed to become, a director or officer of Constant
Contact, or is or was serving, or has agreed to serve, at our
request as a director, officer, partner, employee or trustee of,
or in a similar capacity with, another corporation, partnership,
joint venture, trust or other enterprise (all such persons being
referred to as an “Indemnitee”), or by reason of any
action alleged to have been taken or omitted in such capacity,
against all expenses (including attorneys’ fees),
judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and
reasonably incurred in connection with such action, suit or
proceeding and any appeal therefrom, if such Indemnitee acted in
good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be
in, or not opposed to, our best interests, and, with respect to
any criminal action or proceeding, he or she had no reasonable
cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. Our restated
certificate of incorporation provides that we will indemnify any
Indemnitee who was or is a party to an action or suit by or in
the right of Constant Contact to procure a judgment in our favor
by reason of the fact that the Indemnitee is or was, or has
agreed to become, a director or officer of Constant Contact, or
is or was serving, or has agreed to serve, at our request as a
director, officer, partner, employee or trustee of, or in a
similar capacity with, another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust or other enterprise, or by reason of any action
alleged to have been taken or omitted in such capacity, against
all expenses (including attorneys’ fees) and, to the extent
permitted by law, amounts paid in settlement actually and
reasonably incurred in connection with such action, suit or
proceeding, and any appeal therefrom, if the Indemnitee acted in
good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be
in, or not opposed to, the best interests of Constant Contact,
except that no indemnification shall be made with respect to any
claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been
adjudged to be liable to us, unless a court determines that,
despite such adjudication but in view of all of the
circumstances, he or she is entitled to indemnification of such
expenses. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent that any
Indemnitee has been successful, on the merits or otherwise, he
or she will be indemnified by us against all expenses (including
attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred in
connection therewith. Expenses must be advanced to an Indemnitee
under certain circumstances.
We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our
directors and officers. These indemnification agreements may
require us, among other things, to indemnify our directors and
officers for some expenses, including attorneys’ fees,
judgments, fines and settlement amounts incurred by a director
or officer in any action or proceeding arising out of his or her
service as one of our directors or officers, or any of our
subsidiaries or any other company or enterprise to which the
person provides services at our request.
We maintain a general liability insurance policy that covers
certain liabilities of directors and officers of our corporation
arising out of claims based on acts or omissions in their
capacities as directors or officers.
In any underwriting agreement we enter into in connection with
the sale of common stock being registered hereby, the
underwriters will agree to indemnify, under certain conditions,
us, our directors, our officers and persons who control us
within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
against certain liabilities.
Item 15.
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
Set forth below is information regarding shares of common stock
issued, and options granted, by us within the past three years.
Also included is the consideration, if any, received by us for
such shares and options and information relating to the section
of the Securities Act, or rule of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, under which exemption from registration was claimed.
(a) Issuances
of Capital Stock
On May 12, 2006 and July 20, 2006, we issued and sold
an aggregate of 2,521,432 shares of our Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock to 10 venture capital funds and 15
other existing stockholders for an aggregate purchase price of
$14,999,998.98. These shares automatically converted into
3,277,851 shares of common stock in connection with the
closing of our initial public offering.
On June 20, 2006, a holder of two warrants to purchase
shares of our common stock exercised its warrants for an
aggregate of 7,921 shares for an aggregate purchase price
of $10,909.17.
On June 19, 2006, a holder of a warrant to purchase shares
of our common stock exercised its warrant for an aggregate of
59,718 shares for an aggregate purchase price of $82,230.21.
On August 7, 2006, a holder of a warrant to purchase shares
of our common stock exercised its warrant for an aggregate of
64,400 shares for an aggregate purchase price of $88,676.27.
On April 21, 2007, a holder of a warrant to purchase shares
of our common stock exercised its warrant for 29,380 shares
for an aggregate purchase price of $42,454.
On September 17, 2007, a holder of a warrant to purchase
shares of our common stock exercised its warrant for 96,324
shares for an aggregate purchase price of $116,094.
As of the closing of our initial public offering, a holder of a
warrant to purchase shares of our redeemable convertible
preferred stock exercised its warrant for 120,000 shares, which
automatically converted into 156,000 shares of our common
stock upon such closing, for an aggregate purchase price of
$60,000.
No underwriters were involved in the foregoing sales of
securities. The securities described in this paragraph
(a) of Item 15 were sold in reliance on the exemption
from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, as set
forth in Section 4(2) under the Securities Act and
Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder
relative to sales by an issuer not involving any public
offering, to the extent an exemption from such registration was
required.
(b) Stock
Options and Restricted Stock
From January 1, 2005 through March 26, 2008, we have
granted stock options to purchase an aggregate of
2,687,039 shares of our common stock with exercise prices
ranging from $0.04 to $22.27 per share, to employees,
directors, and consultants pursuant to our 1999 Stock
Option/Stock Issuance Plan. From January 1, 2005 through
March 26, 2008, an aggregate of 2,839,489 shares have
been issued upon the exercise of stock options for an aggregate
consideration of $213,699. The shares of common stock issued
upon exercise of options are deemed restricted securities for
the purposes of the Securities Act.
On December 12, 2005, we issued 192,010 shares of our
common stock to Mr. Wasserman pursuant to a restricted
stock agreement for an aggregate purchase price of $11,816.
The issuances of stock options and the shares of common stock
issuable upon the exercise of the options and the shares of
restricted stock as described in this paragraph (b) of
Item 15 were issued pursuant to written compensatory plans
or arrangements with our employees, directors and consultants,
in reliance on the exemption provided by Section 3(b) of
the Securities Act and Rule 701 promulgated thereunder. All
recipients either received adequate information about us or had
access, through employment or other relationships, to such
information.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the
underwriters at the closing specified in the underwriting
agreement, certificates in such denominations and registered in
such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt
delivery to each purchaser.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors,
officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to
the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
registrant of
expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling
person of the registrant in the successful defense of any
action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director,
officer or controlling person in connection with the securities
being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of
its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling
precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the
question whether such indemnification by it is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed
by the final adjudication of such issue.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under
the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the
form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement
in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in the form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities
Act shall be deemed to be part of the registration statement as
of the time it was declared effective.
(2) For purposes of determining any liability under
the Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains
a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(3) For the purpose of determining liability under
the Securities Act to any purchaser, each prospectus filed
pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement
relating to an offering, other than registration statements
relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in
reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and
included in the registration statement as of the date it is
first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no
statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is
part of the registration statement or made in a document
incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the
registration statement or prospectus that is part of the
registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of
contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify
any statement that was made in the registration statement or
prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made
in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.
(4) For the purpose of determining liability of the
registrant under the Securities Act to any purchaser in the
initial distribution of the securities, in a primary offering of
securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this
registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method
used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities
are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the
following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a
seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell
such securities to such purchaser:
(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the
undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be
filed pursuant to Rule 424;
(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the
offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant
or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;
(iii) The portion of any other free writing
prospectus relating to the offering containing material
information about the undersigned registrant or its securities
provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and
(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the
offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the
Registrant has duly caused this Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Waltham,
Commonwealth of Massachusetts on the
10th day
of April, 2008.
CONSTANT CONTACT, INC.
By:
/s/ Gail
F. Goodman
Gail F. Goodman
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, this
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement has been signed
by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
Signature
Title
Date
/s/ Gail
F.
Goodman
Gail
F. Goodman
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)
Financial Statement Schedules — No financial statement
schedules have been submitted because they are not required or
are not applicable or because the information required is
included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes
thereto.
Dates Referenced Herein and Documents Incorporated by Reference