SEC Info  
  Home     Search     My Interests     Help     Sign In     Please Sign In  

Compass Bancshares Inc · 424B3 · On 1/19/06

Filed On 1/19/06 11:57am ET   ·   SEC File 333-129940   ·   Accession Number 950129-6-405

  in   Show  and 
Help... Wildcards:  ? (any letter),  * (many).  Logic:  for Docs: (and), (or);  for Text: (anywhere),  "(&)" (near).
  As Of               Filer                 Filing     As/For/On Docs:Pgs              Issuer               Agent

 1/19/06  Compass Bancshares Inc            424B3                  1:179                                    950129

Prospectus   ·   Rule 424(b)(3)
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: 424B3       Compass Bancshares, Inc.- Registration              HTML  1,117K 
                          No.333-129940                                          


Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page
"Table of Contents
"Summary
"Who We Are
"For
"TexasBanc s Financial Advisors Have Provided an Opinion as to the Fairness of the Merger Consideration, from a Financial Point of View, to TexasBanc s Shareholders
"TexasBanc s Shareholders Will Receive Cash or Shares of Compass Common Stock in the Merger For Each Whole Share of TexasBanc Common Stock Depending on Their Election and any Adjustment
"Regardless of Whether You make a Cash Election or a Stock Election, You May Not Receive the Consideration You Elect
"In Order to Make an Election, TexasBanc s Shareholders Must Properly Complete and Deliver an Election Form Before the Election Deadline, which is 5:00 p.m. New York time on February 15, 2006
"What Will Happen to Outstanding TexasBanc Options
"Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
"Shareholder Approval of the 280G Payments
"TexasBanc Shareholder Vote Required to Approve the Merger and 280G Payments
"Dissenters Rights
"Certain TexasBanc Directors and Executive Officers May Have Interests in the Merger that are Different from, or in Addition to, Their Interests as Shareholders
"TexasBanc Has Agreed When and How TexasBanc and its Subsidiaries Can Consider Third-Party Acquisition Proposals
"Accounting Treatment
"The Completion of the Merger is Subject to Certain Conditions
"We Have Not Yet Obtained All Regulatory Approvals
"Termination of the Agreement and Plan of Merger
"Amended and Restated Shareholder Voting Agreement
"The Rights of TexasBanc s Shareholders After the Merger Will be Different
"Special Meeting of TexasBanc
"Selected Historical Financial Data
"Compass
"TexasBanc
"Questions and Answers About the Merger and the Special Meeting
"Risk Factors
"Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
"Special Meeting
"Time and Place of Special Meeting
"Matters to be Considered at the Special Meeting
"Record Date for the Special Meeting and Voting Rights
"Required Votes
"Quorum; Abstention and Broker Non-Votes
"Voting By Proxy
"Other Business, Adjournment and Postponements
"Proposal 1. Approval of the Agreement and Plan of Merger the Merger
"General
"Background of the Merger
"Recommendation of TexasBanc s Board and Its Reasons for the Merger
"Opinion of TexasBanc s Financial Advisor
"Governmental and Regulatory Approvals
"Procedures for Making Elections
"Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger
"Employment Agreements
"Treatment of TexasBanc Stock Options
"Change in Control Payments
"Special Bonus Payments
"Stay Pay Agreements
"Salary Continuation Agreement
"TexasBank Nonqualified Senior Management Deferred Compensation Plan
"Severance Pay
"Benefits Table
"License Agreement
"Director and Officers Indemnification and Insurance
"The Agreement and Plan of Merger
"Structure
"Effective Time
"Merger Consideration
"Conversion of Shares
"Dissenting Shares
"Conduct of TexasBanc Business Pending the Merger
"Conduct of Compass Business Pending the Merger
"Representations and Warranties
"Employee Benefits Matters
"Conditions to Completion of the Merger
"Shareholder Vote
"No Solicitation of Other Proposals
"Additional Agreements
"Waiver and Amendment of the Agreement and Plan of Merger
"Stock Exchange Listing
"Restrictions on Resales by Affiliates
"Registration Rights Agreement
"Selling Stockholders; Plan of Distribution
"Selling Stockholders
"Plan of Distribution
"Proposal 2. Approval of 280g Payments
"Price Range of Common Stock and Dividends
"Information About Compass
"Information About Texasbanc
"Supervision and Regulation
"Description of Compass Capital Stock
"Comparison of Shareholders Rights
"Other Matters
"Legal Matters
"Experts
"Where You Can Find More Information
"Appendix A
"Agreement and Plan of Merger (including amendment)
"Appendix B
"Sandler O Neil & Partners L.P. Fairness Opinion, dated September 17, 2005
"Appendix C
"Appendix D
"Provisions of Texas Law Relating to Dissenting Shareholders
"Appendix E
"Registration Rights Agreement (including amended and restated joinder agreement)

This is an EDGAR HTML document rendered as filed.  [ Alternative Formats ]


Sponsored Ads...

  e424b3  

Table of Contents

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-129940
Image -- (TEXASBANK HOLDING CO. LOGO)
Dear Fellow Shareholders:
      You are cordially invited to attend a special meeting of shareholders of TexasBanc Holding Co. to be held at The Fort Worth Club, located at 306 West 7th Street 12th Floor, Fort Worth, Texas 76102 at 2:00 p.m., local time on Thursday, February 16, 2006.
      At the special meeting, you will be asked to take certain action in connection with an Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended, among TexasBanc, Compass Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, XYZ Acquisition Corp. In the merger, XYZ Acquisition Corp. will merge with and into TexasBanc and subsequently TexasBanc will merge with and into Compass.
      Each TexasBanc shareholder will be entitled to elect to receive for each share of TexasBanc common stock either shares of Compass common stock or cash, subject to the amount of shares and cash available and the election and allocation procedures in the agreement and plan of merger. YOU MUST MAKE THIS ELECTION BY 5:00 P.M. NEW YORK TIME ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2006. Enclosed is a Form of Election and Letter of Transmittal, together with an envelope addressed to Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, which may be used for this purpose.
      Generally, to the extent that you receive Compass common stock, the merger will be tax-free to you, other than with respect to any cash consideration or cash you receive for fractional shares.
      If the merger is completed, you will receive, at your election (but subject to proration and adjustment as provided in the agreement and plan of merger), cash or shares of Compass common stock, in either case, having a value equal to $1,252.97 plus the product of 26.6987 multiplied by the average closing price of Compass common stock for the ten trading days immediately before completion of the merger, for each share of TexasBanc common stock you hold immediately before the completion date of the merger. On September 15, 2005, two days before the merger was publicly announced, the ten-day average closing per share price of Compass common stock was $46.93; if that were the average closing price of Compass common stock under the agreement and plan of merger, it would result in consideration per share of TexasBanc common stock of approximately $2,505.94 in cash or 53.3974 shares of Compass common stock. On January 12, 2006, the latest practicable date before the printing of this proxy statement/ prospectus, the ten-day average closing per share price of Compass common stock was $48.895; if that were the average closing price of Compass common stock under the agreement and plan of merger, it would result in consideration per share of TexasBanc common stock of approximately $2,558.40 in cash or 52.3244 shares of Compass common stock. These calculations of the merger consideration assume that approximately 2,264 shares of TexasBanc common stock will be issued on exercise of outstanding TexasBanc stock options. In no event will Compass issue more than 4,938,206 shares of Compass common stock or pay more than $231.75 million in cash in merger consideration, including if there are more than 2,264 shares of TexasBanc common stock issued as a result of the exercise of TexasBanc stock options, and the consideration payable to each shareholder will be proportionately reduced if necessary to give effect to these limits.
      The actual value of the merger consideration on the completion date of the merger that you will receive for each share of TexasBanc common stock will depend in part on the average closing price of Compass common stock for the ten trading days immediately before the completion date of the merger. If you receive Compass common stock as merger consideration, the price per share of Compass common stock on the date you receive the shares may be different than the average closing price of Compass common stock on the NASDAQ for the ten trading days immediately before the completion of the merger. These prices are impossible to know at this time and will not be known at the time of the special meeting. Therefore, the actual value of the merger consideration may be different than the estimated value based on the current price or the price at the time of the special meeting. Compass common stock is traded on the NASDAQ National Market under the trading symbol “CBSS.” You may obtain current market prices for Compass’ common stock through newspapers, from reputable internet sources or from your broker.
      As explained in more detail on pages 51 through 55 of this document, the dollar value of the consideration that you will receive upon completion of the merger will be approximately the same as of the completion of the merger regardless of whether you make a cash election or a stock election. Since elections


Table of Contents

are subject to potential proration as described on pages 54 and 55 of this document, there can be no assurance that you will receive the type of consideration you elect as to all your shares of TexasBanc common stock.
      Based on the estimated number of shares of TexasBanc common stock on the record date of the special meeting, Compass expects to issue 4,938,206 shares of Compass common stock to TexasBanc’s shareholders in connection with the merger. Immediately after the merger, former TexasBanc’s shareholders are currently expected to own approximately 4.0% of the then-outstanding shares of Compass common stock (without giving effect to shares of Compass common stock held by TexasBanc’s shareholders before the merger).
      Holders of approximately 82% of the outstanding TexasBanc common stock have agreed with Compass to vote in favor of the agreement and plan of merger.
      After careful consideration, TexasBanc’s board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” approval of the agreement and plan of merger.
      To complete the merger, holders of two-thirds of the outstanding shares of TexasBanc common stock must approve the agreement and plan of merger. Your vote is very important regardless of the number of shares of TexasBanc common stock you own. If you fail to vote your shares, either in person or by proxy, this will have the effect of a vote against the agreement and plan of merger and the transactions contemplated by the agreement and plan of merger, including the merger. Whether or not you expect to attend the special meeting, please vote as soon as possible to ensure that your shares are represented at the meeting. You may vote your shares by marking your votes on the proxy card, signing and dating it and mailing it with the envelope provided. If you sign and return your proxy card without specifying your choice, it will be understood that you wish to have your shares voted “FOR” the agreement and plan of merger and “FOR” approval of the payments to be made to certain executive officers of TexasBanc.
      This document provides you with detailed information about the merger. In addition to being a proxy statement of TexasBanc, this document is also the prospectus of Compass for Compass common stock that will be issued to you in connection with the merger. We encourage you to read the entire document carefully. Please pay particular attention to “Risk Factors” beginning on page 17 for a discussion of the risks related to the merger and owning Compass common stock after the merger.
      I hope to see you on February 16, 2006 in Fort Worth.
  Sincerely,
 
  Image -- -s- BILL F. KNIGHT
 
  Bill F. Knight
  Chairman of the Board
  TexasBanc Holding Co.
      Compass common stock is publicly traded through the NASDAQ National Market. Compass’ trading symbol is “CBSS”. There is no public trading market for TexasBanc’s common stock.
      NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES REGULATORS HAVE APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THE SECURITIES TO BE ISSUED IN THE MERGER OR DETERMINED IF THIS DOCUMENT IS TRUTHFUL OR COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
      THE SHARES OF COMPASS COMMON STOCK TO BE ISSUED IN THE MERGER ARE NOT DEPOSITS OR SAVINGS ACCOUNTS OR OTHER OBLIGATIONS OF ANY BANK OR SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, AND ARE NOT INSURED BY THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION OR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY.
      This proxy statement/ prospectus is dated January 18, 2006 and is first being mailed to TexasBanc’s shareholders on or about January 19, 2006.


Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION
      This proxy statement/ prospectus incorporates important business and financial information about Compass Bancshares, Inc. from other documents that are not included in or delivered with this proxy statement/ prospectus. This information is available to you without charge upon your written or oral request. You can obtain those documents incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus by accessing the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website maintained at www.sec.gov or by requesting copies in writing or by telephone from Compass at the following address:
Compass Bancshares, Inc.
Ed Bilek
15 South 20th Street
Birmingham, Alabama 35233
(205) 933-3331
      TexasBanc is not subject to the reporting and informational requirements maintained by the Securities and Exchange Commission and does not file reports or other information with Securities and Exchange Commission.
      If you would like to request documents, please do so by February 9, 2006 in order to receive them before the special meeting. If you request any documents incorporated by reference from Compass, Compass will mail them to you within one business day by first-class mail, or similar means.
      You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in this document in determining how to vote your shares at the special meeting. Compass and TexasBanc have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from what is contained in this document. This document is dated January 18, 2006. You should not assume that the information contained in this document is accurate as of any date other than that date, and neither the mailing of this document to shareholders nor the issuance of Compass’ common stock in the merger creates any implication to the contrary.
      See “Where You Can Find More Information” on page 94.


Table of Contents

TEXASBANC HOLDING CO.
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held On February 16, 2006
To the Shareholders of TexasBanc Holding Co.:
      TexasBanc Holding Co. will hold a special meeting of shareholders at The Fort Worth Club, located at 306 West 7th Street 12th Floor, Fort Worth, Texas 76102 on Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 2:00 p.m., local time, for the following purposes:
        1. To approve and adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated September 17, 2005, as amended, among Compass Bancshares, Inc., XYZ Acquisition Corp., Compass’ wholly-owned subsidiary, and TexasBanc Holding Co., as it may be amended from time to time, by which Compass will acquire TexasBanc through the merger of XYZ Acquisition Corp. with and into TexasBanc and the subsequent merger of TexasBanc into Compass. A copy of the agreement and plan of merger is attached as Appendix A to the accompanying proxy statement/ prospectus of which this notice is a part. This proposal is described more fully in the proxy statement/ prospectus of which this notice is a part.
 
        2. To approve payments to certain executive officers in connection with the merger that separately or in the aggregate could reasonably be expected to result in the payment of any “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. The payments are referred to as 280G Payments, and this proposal is described more fully in the proxy statement/ prospectus of which this notice is a part.
      No other business will be transacted at the special meeting. We have fixed the close of business on December 30, 2005 as the record date for determining those shareholders entitled to vote at the special meeting. Only TexasBanc shareholders of record at the close of business on that date are entitled to notice of the special meeting, and only the shareholders of record of TexasBanc common stock at the close of business on that date are entitled to vote at the special meeting. In order for the agreement and plan of merger to be approved by TexasBanc’s shareholders, the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding shares of TexasBanc common stock entitled to vote must vote for of approval of the agreement and plan of merger. Approval of the 280G Payments requires the affirmative vote of more than 75% of TexasBanc capital stock entitled to vote, excluding those shares held or constructively owned by the executive officers whose compensation is being considered. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as votes against each of the proposals being presented. If you wish to attend the special meeting and your shares are held in the name of a broker, trust, bank or other nominee, you must bring with you a proxy or letter from the broker, trustee, bank or nominee to confirm your beneficial ownership of the shares. In compliance with Article 2.27 of the Texas Business Corporation Act, a list of shareholders entitled to vote at the special meeting will be available for inspection by any shareholder at the offices of TexasBanc during usual business hours for a period of ten days before the special meeting. The list of shareholders will also be available for inspection at the special meeting from 1:00 p.m., local time, until adjournment of the special meeting.
      If you do not vote in favor of the agreement and plan of merger and you strictly comply with the procedures set forth in Article 5.11, 5.12 and 5.13 of the Texas Business Corporation Act, you will be entitled to obtain payment in cash of the fair market value of your shares of common stock as determined under these provisions. A copy of these provisions is included as Appendix D to this document, and a summary of these provisions can be found in the section titled “The Agreement and Plan of Merger — Dissenters’ Rights” beginning on page 63 of this document.
  By Order of the Board of Directors,
 
  Image -- -s- VERNON W. BRYANT, JR.
 
  Vernon W. Bryant, Jr.
  President
Fort Worth, Texas
January 18, 2006
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF SHARES YOU MAY OWN. TEXASBANC’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS SINCERELY DESIRES YOUR PRESENCE AT THE SPECIAL MEETING. HOWEVER, SO THAT TEXASBANC MAY BE SURE THAT YOUR VOTE WILL BE INCLUDED, PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD PROMPTLY. YOU MAY REVOKE YOUR PROXY AT ANY TIME BEFORE IT IS VOTED AT THE MEETING. IF YOU ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING, YOU MAY VOTE IN PERSON IF YOU WISH, EVEN IF YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY RETURNED YOUR PROXY CARD.
TEXASBANC’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, WITH VERNON BRYANT ABSTAINING, ALSO RECOMMENDS YOU VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE 280G PAYMENTS.


Table of Contents

 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
           
    1  
      1  
      1  
      2  
      2  
      2  
      4  
      4  
      5  
      5  
      5  
      6  
      6  
      6  
      7  
      7  
      7  
      7  
      8  
      8  
      8  
    9  
      9  
      12  
    13  
    17  
    21  
    23  
      23  
      23  
      23  
      23  
      23  
      24  
      25  



Table of Contents

           
    26  
      26  
      26  
      29  
      31  
      38  
      38  
      41  
      42  
    44  
      44  
      45  
      45  
      46  
      46  
      46  
      46  
      47  
      48  
      48  
      49  
      49  
    50  
      50  
      50  
      51  
      55  
      55  
      56  
      57  
      57  
      58  
      59  
      59  
      60  
      60  
      61  
      62  
      62  
      62  
      63  
      65  
      66  

ii



Table of Contents

           
      66  
      68  
    69  
      69  
      70  
    72  
    75  
    78  
    79  
    82  
    85  
    86  
    93  
    94  
    94  
    94  
     
   Agreement and Plan of Merger (including amendment)
   Sandler O’Neil & Partners L.P. Fairness Opinion, dated September 17, 2005
   Amended and Restated Shareholder Voting Agreement
   Provisions of Texas Law Relating to Dissenting Shareholders
   Registration Rights Agreement (including amended and restated joinder agreement)

iii



Table of Contents

 
SUMMARY
      This summary highlights selected information from this proxy statement/ prospectus and may not contain all of the information that is important to you. To understand the merger fully and for a more complete description of the legal terms of the merger, you should carefully read this entire document and the other documents to which Compass and TexasBanc have referred you, including the Appendices to this proxy statement/ prospectus. For more information about Compass and TexasBanc see “Where You Can Find More Information” on page 94.
 
Who We Are
  Compass Bancshares, Inc.
  15 South 20th Street
  Birmingham, Alabama 35233
  (205) 933-3000
      Compass is a Delaware corporation which was organized in 1970. It is a financial holding company registered with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System under the Bank Holding Company Act. Most of Compass’ revenues are from its bank subsidiaries located in Texas, Alabama, Florida, Arizona, Colorado and New Mexico.
      As of September 30, 2005, Compass and its subsidiaries had consolidated assets of $30.1 billion, consolidated deposits of $18.8 billion, and total shareholders’ equity of $2.2 billion. See “Where You Can Find More Information” on page 94; “Selected Historical Financial Data” beginning on page 9; and “Information About Compass” on page 78.
  TexasBanc Holding Co.
  102 North Main Street
  Weatherford, Texas 76086
  (817) 560-6400
      TexasBanc is a Texas corporation that was organized in 1986. It is a bank holding company registered with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System under the Bank Holding Company Act. Virtually all of TexasBanc’s revenues are from its sole bank subsidiary, TexasBank, with its home office in Fort Worth, Texas.
      As of September 30, 2005, TexasBanc had, on a consolidated basis, total assets of $1.686 billion, total deposits of $1.459 million, and total shareholders’ equity of $129.7 million. See “Information About TexasBanc” beginning on page 79.
 
TexasBanc’s Board Recommends that You Vote “For” the Agreement and Plan of Merger; TexasBanc’s Reasons for Merger (page 29)
      TexasBanc’s board of directors has determined that the merger is advisable and in your best interests and unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the agreement and plan of merger.
      In its deliberations and in making its determination, TexasBanc’s board of directors considered many factors including, without limitation, the following:
  •  TexasBanc’s board of directors’ familiarity with and review of information concerning the business, results of operations, financial condition, competitive position and future prospects of TexasBanc;
 
  •  the current and prospective environment in which TexasBanc operates, including national, regional and local economic conditions, the competitive environment for banks, thrifts and other financial institutions generally and the increased regulatory burdens on financial institutions generally and the trend toward consolidation in the banking industry and in the financial services industry;
 
  •  the financial presentation of Sandler O’Neill and the opinion of Sandler O’Neill dated as of September 17, 2005, that, as of September 17, 2005 (the date on which TexasBanc’s board of directors approved the agreement and plan of merger), and subject to the assumptions, limitations and qualifications set forth in the opinion, the total aggregate consideration to be received from Compass, which consisted of no more than $231.75 million in cash and 4.938 million shares of Compass common

1



Table of Contents

  stock, including a cashless exercise of all outstanding TexasBanc options, is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of TexasBanc’s common stock (see “— Opinion of TexasBanc’s Financial Adviser,” beginning on page 31);
 
  •  the results that could be expected to be obtained by TexasBanc if it continued to operate independently, and the likely benefits to shareholders of such course, as compared with the value of the merger consideration being offered by Compass;
 
  •  that holders of approximately 82% of the shares of TexasBanc common stock had indicated their willingness to sign the shareholder voting agreement, whereby they would agree to vote the shares of TexasBanc common stock beneficially owned by them in favor of the agreement and plan of merger;
 
  •  that some of TexasBanc’s directors and executive officers have other financial interests in the merger that are in addition to their interests as TexasBanc shareholders, including interests created as a result of employment and compensation arrangements with TexasBanc and the manner in which they would be affected by the merger, as well as the new employment agreements that certain of these persons entered into with Compass in connection with the merger;
 
TexasBanc’s Financial Advisors Have Provided an Opinion as to the Fairness of the Merger Consideration, from a Financial Point of View, to TexasBanc’s Shareholders (page 31)
      Sandler O’Neil & Partners, L.P. delivered its opinion to TexasBanc’s board of directors that, as of September 17, 2005 and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in the opinion, the aggregate merger consideration to be received by holders of the outstanding shares of common stock of TexasBanc under the agreement and plan of merger was fair from a financial point of view to such holders.
      The full text of the written opinion of Sandler O’Neil, dated September 17, 2005, which sets forth assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken in connection with the opinion, is attached as Appendix B to this proxy statement/ prospectus. TexasBanc’s shareholders should read the opinion in its entirety. Sandler O’Neil provided its opinion for the information and assistance of TexasBanc’s board of directors in connection with its consideration of the transaction. The Sandler O’Neil opinion is not a recommendation as to how any holder of TexasBanc common stock should vote or make any election with respect to the transaction.
 
TexasBanc’s Shareholders Will Receive Cash or Shares of Compass Common Stock in the Merger For Each Whole Share of TexasBanc Common Stock Depending on Their Election and any Adjustment (page 51)
      TexasBanc’s shareholders will have the right to elect to receive merger consideration for each of their shares of TexasBanc common stock in the form of cash or shares of Compass common stock, subject to proration and adjustment as described below. The election must be made with respect to a whole share and not any portion of a share. In the event of proration and adjustment, a TexasBanc shareholder may receive a portion of the merger consideration in a form other than that which the shareholder elected. The proration and adjustment will be made with respect to a whole shares and not any portion of a share.
 
Regardless of Whether You make a Cash Election or a Stock Election, You May Not Receive the Consideration You Elect (page 54)
      The aggregate number of shares of Compass common stock that will be issued and the aggregate amount of cash that will be paid to TexasBanc’s shareholders as consideration in the merger are fixed at 4,938,206 shares and $231.75 million in cash, respectively. As a result, depending on the number of shareholders who elect to receive Compass common stock or cash, shareholders electing the over-subscribed form of consideration will be proportionately cut back and will receive a portion of their consideration in the other form, despite their election. In addition, if there are more than 2,264 shares of TexasBanc common stock issued as a result of the exercise of TexasBanc’s stock options, the consideration payable to each shareholder will be proportionately reduced if necessary to give effect to the above limits.
      The value of the merger consideration to be received by TexasBanc’s shareholders will fluctuate with the market price of Compass common stock and will be determined in part based on the average closing price on

2



Table of Contents

the NASDAQ of Compass common stock for the ten trading days immediately before the completion date of the merger. As explained in more detail in “The Agreement and Plan of Merger — Merger Consideration” beginning on page 51, if you are TexasBanc shareholder, whether you make a cash election or a stock election, the value of the consideration (before tax) that you will receive as of the date of completion of the merger will be substantially the same based on the average Compass closing price used to calculate the merger consideration.
      TexasBanc’s shareholders may specify different elections with respect to different shares that they hold (if, for example, you own 100 shares of TexasBanc common stock, you could make a cash election with respect to 50 shares and a stock election with respect to the other 50 shares).
      Set forth below is a table showing a hypothetical range of ten-day average closing prices for a share of Compass common stock and the corresponding consideration that a TexasBanc shareholder would receive in a cash election, on the one hand, or in a stock election, on the other hand, under the merger consideration formula. As described below, regardless of whether you make a cash election or a stock election, you may nevertheless receive a mix of cash and stock due to proration and adjustment. The proration and adjustment will be made with respect to whole shares and not any portion of a share. Based on the closing price of Compass common stock on the NASDAQ for the ten trading days ending January 12, 2006, the last practicable date before the printing of this proxy statement/ prospectus, the ten-day average price for a share of Compass common stock was $48.895. The table does not reflect that cash will be paid instead of fractional shares and assumes that 2,264 shares of TexasBanc common stock will be issued on exercise of outstanding TexasBanc stock options. In no event will Compass issue more than 4,938,206 shares of Compass common stock or pay more than $231.75 million in cash in merger consideration, including if there are more than 2,264 shares issued as a result of the exercise of TexasBanc’s stock options, and the consideration payable to each shareholder will be proportionately reduced if necessary to give effect to these limits.
Total Merger Consideration
                             
        Number of Shares of    
Hypothetical Ten-Day   Cash Consideration   Compass Common   Market Value of
Average Closing Sales   per Share of   Stock per Share of   Stock Consideration
Price for Compass   TexasBanc   TexasBanc Common   of TexasBanc
Common Stock   Common Stock   Stock   Common Stock*
             
$ 35.00       2,187.42       62.4978       2,187.42  
   36.00       2,214.12       61.5034       2,214.12  
   37.00       2,240.82       60.5628       2,240.82  
   38.00       2,267.52       59.6716       2,267.52  
   39.00       2,294.22       58.8261       2,294.22  
   40.00       2,320.92       58.0230       2,320.92  
   41.00       2,347.62       57.2589       2,347.62  
   42.00       2,374.32       56.5313       2,374.32  
   43.00       2,401.01       55.8376       2,401.01  
   44.00       2,427.71       55.1753       2,427.71  
   45.00       2,454.41       54.5425       2,454.41  
   46.00       2,481.11       53.9372       2,481.11  
   47.00       2,507.81       53.3576       2,507.81  
   48.00       2,534.51       52.8022       2,534.51  
   49.00       2,561.21       52.2695       2,561.21  
   50.00       2,587.91       51.7581       2,587.91  
   51.00       2,614.60       51.2667       2,614.60  
   52.00       2,641.30       50.7943       2,641.30  
   53.00       2,668.00       50.3396       2,668.00  
   54.00       2,694.70       49.9018       2,694.70  
   55.00       2,721.40       49.4800       2,721.40  
 
Based on the hypothetical ten-day average closing price of Compass common stock.
      The examples above are illustrative only. If you are a TexasBanc shareholder, the value of the merger consideration that you actually receive will be based in part on the actual average closing price of Compass

3



Table of Contents

common stock on the NASDAQ for the ten trading days immediately before the completion date of the merger, as described below. If that average price is not set forth in the table above, including because the price is outside the range of the amounts set forth above, TexasBanc does not intend to re-solicit proxies from its shareholders in connection with the merger.
      The merger consideration to be received for each share of TexasBanc common stock will be based in part on the arithmetic average of the closing prices of Compass common stock reported on the NASDAQ for the ten consecutive trading days immediately before the completion date of the merger. Based on the average closing price of Compass common stock on the ten trading days ending January 12, 2006, which was $48.895, for each of your shares of TexasBanc common stock you would receive either approximately $2,558.40 in cash or 52.3244 shares of Compass common stock, subject to possible proration and adjustment. However, we will compute the actual amount of cash and number of shares of Compass common stock you will receive in the merger using the formula contained in the agreement and plan of merger. For a summary of the formula contained in the agreement and plan of merger, see “The Agreement and Plan of Merger — Merger Consideration” beginning on page 51.
      The consideration to be paid to shareholders cannot be determined until the close of trading on the trading day immediately before the completion date of the merger.
 
In Order to Make an Election, TexasBanc’s Shareholders Must Properly Complete and Deliver an Election Form Before the Election Deadline, which is 5:00 p.m. New York time on February 15, 2006 (page 42)
      At the time this proxy statement/ prospectus is mailed, an exchange agent will mail or deliver to holders of record a form of election and transmittal materials. You must properly complete and deliver to the exchange agent the election materials along with your stock certificates. Please do not send your stock certificates or form of election with your proxy card for the special meeting.
      Forms of election and stock certificates must be received by the exchange agent by the election deadline, which is 5:00 p.m., New York time, on February 15, 2006. Once you tender your stock certificates to the exchange agent you may not transfer your shares of TexasBanc common stock, unless you revoke your election by written notice to the exchange agent, which notice is received before the election deadline.
      If you fail to submit a properly completed form of election, together with your stock certificates, before the election deadline, you will be deemed not to have made an election. As a no election holder, you will be paid approximately equivalent value per share to the amount paid per share to the holders making elections, but you may be paid all in cash, all in Compass common stock, or in part cash and in part Compass common stock, depending on the remaining cash and Compass common stock available for paying the merger consideration after honoring the cash elections and stock elections that other shareholders have made.
      If the merger is not completed for any reason or if a shareholder revokes his or her election, any stock certificates submitted before that time will be returned by the exchange agent.
 
What Will Happen to Outstanding TexasBanc Options (page 45)
      In accordance with the 2002 Stock Option Plan for TexasBanc Holding Co., referred to in this proxy statement/ prospectus as the “TexasBanc stock option plan”, TexasBanc presently intends to accelerate the vesting of any unvested TexasBanc stock options prior to the stockholders meeting such that the holders of TexasBanc stock options will be able to exercise those options and make an election with respect to the shares of TexasBanc common stock that they receive. Holders of vested TexasBanc stock options (including previously unvested options which have been accelerated) can exercise those options at any time until the closing, including under the “cashless” exercise provisions of TexasBanc’s stock option plan, subject to the actual completion of the merger. To the extent that TexasBanc stock options have not been exercised before the closing of the merger they will be cancelled, and holders of unexercised options will have no further rights in those options.

4



Table of Contents

 
Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger (page 38)
      The merger is intended to qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, generally referred to in this proxy statement/prospectus as the Code. It is a condition to the closing of the merger that TexasBanc and Compass receive opinions from their respective tax counsel, dated as of the closing date of the merger, to the effect that the merger will be treated as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.
      Assuming the merger qualifies as a reorganization, in general:
  •  If you receive a combination of Compass common stock and cash in exchange for your TexasBanc common stock, you generally will recognize gain equal to the lesser of (1) the sum of the cash and the fair market value of the Compass common stock you receive, minus the tax basis of your TexasBanc common stock surrendered and (2) the amount of cash you receive in the merger. If your tax basis in the TexasBanc common stock surrendered in the merger is greater than the sum of the cash and the fair market value of the Compass common stock you receive, your loss will not be currently allowed or recognized for federal income tax purposes.
 
  •  If you receive solely Compass common stock in exchange for your TexasBanc common stock, then you generally will not recognize any gain or loss, except with respect to cash you receive in lieu of fractional shares of Compass common stock.
 
  •  If you receive solely cash in exchange for your TexasBanc common stock, then you generally will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount of cash you receive and the tax basis in your shares of TexasBanc common stock.
      You should read “The Merger — Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger” beginning on page 38 for a more complete discussion of the United States federal income tax consequences of the merger. We urge you to consult with your tax advisor for a full understanding of the tax consequences of the merger to you.
 
Shareholder Approval of the 280G Payments (page 72)
      Under the Code, certain payments that are contingent on a change in the ownership or control of a corporation are treated as “parachute payments.” The merger will result in certain officers of TexasBanc being entitled to payments and benefits that could be treated for federal tax purposes as “parachute payments” under Section 280G of the Code, generally referred to in this proxy statement/prospectus as “280G Payments”. Both the payor of parachute payments and the recipient of the payments can be subject to unfavorable tax consequences. These unfavorable tax consequences do not apply, however, to payments and benefits associated with a change in ownership or control of a private corporation if the corporation obtains shareholder approval of the payments and benefits after disclosure of the material terms thereof; provided that the right to receive the payments and benefits is conditioned upon receipt of such shareholder approval. TexasBanc is seeking shareholder approval of the executive benefits under Section 280G of the Code so that the unfavorable tax consequences would not apply.
 
TexasBanc Shareholder Vote Required to Approve the Merger and 280G Payments (page 72)
      Approval of the agreement and plan of merger requires the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the shares of TexasBanc common stock outstanding as of the close of business on December 30, 2005, the record date for the special meeting of TexasBanc shareholders. At the close of business on the record date, there were 182,696 shares of TexasBanc common stock outstanding held by 154 holders of record. Each holder of record of TexasBanc common stock on the record date is entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters to be voted upon at the special meeting.
      As of the record date, TexasBanc’s executive officers and directors and their affiliates, as a group, beneficially owned approximately 82% of the common stock of TexasBanc. Holders of approximately 82% of the common stock of TexasBanc have agreed to vote in favor of the agreement and plan of merger by means of an Amended and Restated Shareholder Voting Agreement, sometimes referred to in this proxy statement/

5



Table of Contents

prospectus as the Shareholder Voting Agreement, a copy of which is attached as Appendix C to this proxy statement/prospectus.
      Approval of the 280G Payments requires the affirmative vote of holders of more than 75% of the shares of TexasBanc capital stock outstanding immediately before the time the merger is made effective, excluding any shares held by the executive officers whose compensation is being considered. Under the Shareholder Voting Agreement, holders of approximately 82% of the common stock of TexasBanc entitled to vote on the 280G Payments have agreed to seek shareholder approval of the executive benefits.
 
Dissenters’ Rights (page 63)
      TexasBanc’s shareholders may elect to dissent from the merger and receive the fair value of their shares of TexasBanc common stock in cash by strictly following the procedures and requirements set forth in Articles 5.11, 5.12 and 5.13 of the Texas Business Corporation Act. In order to exercise appraisal rights, you must refrain from voting “FOR” the merger. For more information regarding your right to dissent from the merger and the procedures and requirements to exercise appraisal rights, please see “The Agreement and Plan of Merger — Dissenters’ Rights,” beginning on page 63. We also have attached Articles 5.11, 5.12 and 5.13 of the Texas Business Corporation Act as Appendix D to this proxy statement/ prospectus.
 
Certain TexasBanc Directors and Executive Officers May Have Interests in the Merger that are Different from, or in Addition to, Their Interests as Shareholders (page 44)
      You should be aware that certain of TexasBanc’s directors and executive officers may have interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition to, their interests as shareholders of TexasBanc. TexasBanc’s board of directors was aware of these interests and took them into account at the time they approved the agreement and plan of merger. These interests include, among other things, employment agreements entered into with TexasBanc’s executive officers that take effect upon completion of the merger, the potential accelerated vesting of stock options in connection with the merger, the payments in respect of certain taxes owed on the exercise of stock options, and certain change in control payments, including a special bonus payment.
      In addition, TexasBank, a Texas banking association with its home office in Fort Worth, Texas and a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of TexasBanc, and Texas Bank, a Texas banking association with its home office in Brownwood, Texas, referred to in this proxy statement/ prospectus as “Brownwood”, entered into a license agreement providing Brownwood with the limited, exclusive right to use the name “TexasBank” and certain related trademarks of TexasBank in a limited geographical area. Bill Knight, Chairman of the Board of TexasBanc, serves as a director of Brownwood, and Mr. Knight, together with Dorothy Doss, a director of TexasBanc, beneficially own approximately 68% of the outstanding common stock of Brownwood.
      These interests are more fully described in this proxy statement/ prospectus under the heading “Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger” beginning on page 44.
 
TexasBanc Has Agreed When and How TexasBanc and its Subsidiaries Can Consider Third-Party Acquisition Proposals (page 60)
      TexasBanc has agreed that neither it nor its subsidiaries will solicit, initiate, knowingly encourage, knowingly take any action to facilitate, or furnish or disclose nonpublic information in furtherance of, any inquiries or the making of any acquisition proposal, with a party other than Compass or participate in any discussions or negotiations with, or provide any information to, any person (other than Compass) concerning any acquisition proposal, or enter into any definitive agreement, arrangement or understanding for any acquisition proposal while the merger is pending; however, TexasBanc may furnish or disclose nonpublic information to any third party who has made a written bona fide unsolicited acquisition proposal and agrees to be subject to a confidentiality agreement, if TexasBanc’s board of directors, after consultation with (and based on the advice of) counsel, determines in good faith that the failure to do so would result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable law and TexasBanc has provided Compass with written notice of that determination and a copy of any information furnished or disclosed to the third party.

6



Table of Contents

      Even if the TexasBanc board of directors resolves to change its recommendations in favor of the agreement and plan of merger, TexasBanc must hold the special meeting of shareholders and, unless the agreement and plan of merger has been terminated, TexasBanc’s shareholders who are parties to the Shareholder Voting Agreement will be required to honor the Shareholder Voting Agreement, under which they have agreed to vote the shares of TexasBanc common stock held by them (aggregating approximately 82% of TexasBanc’s outstanding shares) in favor of the agreement and plan of merger and against any competing transaction.
 
Accounting Treatment (page 38)
      The combination of the two companies will be accounted for as an acquisition of TexasBanc by Compass using the purchase method of accounting.
 
The Completion of the Merger is Subject to Certain Conditions (page 59)
      Completion of the merger is subject to various conditions, including the approval of the agreement and plan of merger by TexasBanc’s shareholders, as well as receipt of all required regulatory approvals without the imposition of a condition that would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the company surviving the merger, the accuracy of the other parties’ representations and performance of their respective obligations and receipt of opinions of counsel as to the tax treatment of the merger. There can be no assurance as to whether or when all of the conditions will be satisfied or, where permissible, waived.
 
We Have Not Yet Obtained All Regulatory Approvals (page 41)
      We cannot complete the merger unless we receive the prior approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or Federal Reserve, or that approval is waived by the Federal Reserve. Compass also must give notice of the merger to the Texas Department of Banking. In addition, we need to make filings with various other U.S. federal or state regulatory or other authorities. Compass, TexasBanc and their relevant subsidiaries have either filed or intend to complete the filing promptly after the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus of all required applications and notices with applicable regulatory authorities in connection with the merger. There can be no assurance that all requisite approvals will be obtained or that such approvals will be received on a timely basis.
 
Termination of the Agreement and Plan of Merger (page 61)
      Compass and TexasBanc may agree in writing to terminate the agreement and plan of merger at any time without completing the merger, even after TexasBanc’s shareholders approve the agreement and plan of merger. Either of Compass or TexasBanc may also terminate the agreement and plan of merger if:
  •  the other party breaches any of its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements, the breach would result in the failure of the applicable merger condition and the terminating party is not itself in material breach of the agreement and plan of merger and that breach is not cured on 60 days notice;
 
  •  the merger is not completed on or before June 1, 2006, except that this right to terminate is not available to any party whose failure to comply with the agreement and plan of merger causes or results in the failure of the relevant condition by that date; or
 
  •  any governmental entity that must grant a required regulatory approval has denied approval of the merger and such denial has become final and nonappealable, except that this right to terminate will not be available to any party whose failure to comply with their obligations under the agreement and plan of merger causes or results in that action.
      Compass may terminate the agreement and plan of merger if TexasBanc’s board of directors fails to recommend approval of the agreement and plan of merger or submits the agreement and plan of merger to TexasBanc’s shareholders without a recommendation for its approval or with special and materially adverse conditions or withdraws or modifies or qualifies its recommendation for approval of the agreement and plan of merger in a manner which is adverse to Compass, or if any of the shareholders who are parties to the Shareholder Voting Agreement breaches that agreement.

7



Table of Contents

 
Amended and Restated Shareholder Voting Agreement (page 65)
      Certain shareholders of TexasBanc who collectively own approximately 82% of the outstanding TexasBanc’s common stock have entered into an amended and restated shareholder voting agreement with Compass, which is attached as Appendix C to this proxy statement/ prospectus, in which such shareholders agreed, among other things:
  •  to vote all of the shares they hold, in favor of the agreement and plan of merger at the special meeting;
 
  •  not to sell or transfer their shares before the effective time of the merger or the termination of the agreement and plan of merger; and
 
  •  not to solicit any competing transaction.
 
The Rights of TexasBanc’s Shareholders After the Merger Will be Different (page 86)
      The rights of TexasBanc’s shareholders are governed by Texas law and by TexasBanc’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. The rights of Compass’ shareholders are governed by Delaware law, and by Compass’ Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws. Upon our completion of the merger, the rights of both shareholder groups will be governed by Delaware law and Compass’ Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws.
 
Special Meeting of TexasBanc (page 23)
      TexasBanc plans to hold its special meeting of shareholders on Thursday, February 16, 2006, at 2:00 p.m., local time, at The Fort Worth Club, located at 306 West 7th Street 12th Floor, Fort Worth, Texas 76102. At the meeting you will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger and the 280G Payments.
      You can vote at the special meeting if you owned TexasBanc common stock at the close of business on December 30, 2005. As of that date, there were 182,696 shares of TexasBanc common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. You can cast one vote for each share of TexasBanc common stock that you own.

8



Table of Contents

 
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
 
Compass
      We are providing the following information to aid you in your analysis of the financial aspects of the merger. The following selected historical financial data is from Compass’ audited financial statements as of and for each of the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000 and from Compass’ unaudited quarterly financial statements as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, which in the opinion of management includes all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the unaudited periods. This information is only a summary and contains certain ratios derived from these financial statements. You should read it together with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus. See “Where to Find More Information” on page 94.
COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Income
                                                             
    Nine Months Ended    
    September 30,   For the Year Ended December 31,
         
    2005   2004   2004   2003   2002   2001   2000
                             
    (Unaudited)                    
    (In thousands except per share data)
Interest income:
                                                       
 
Interest and fees on loans
  $ 884,110     $ 693,530     $ 950,161     $ 983,522     $ 1,035,739     $ 1,067,484     $ 1,100,909  
 
Interest on investment securities available for sale
    139,911       137,820       181,075       223,574       308,841       390,030       301,133  
 
Interest on investment securities held to maturity
    91,805       107,780       141,024       69,217       41,025       57,784       105,314  
 
Interest on federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell
    1,020       599       801       485       508       686       6,145  
 
Interest on trading account assets
    577       367       465       489       810       1,737       2,068  
                                           
   
Total interest income
    1,117,423       940,096       1,273,526       1,277,287       1,386,923       1,517,721       1,515,569  
Interest expense:
                                                       
 
Interest on deposits
    177,193       116,058       159,778       174,752       248,221       417,188       543,342  
 
Interest on federal funds purchased and other short term borrowings
    95,808       36,246       58,930       31,091       39,885       107,112       100,505  
 
Interest on FHLB and other borrowings
    129,268       132,583       169,493       192,314       197,108       170,930       153,210  
                                           
   
Total interest expense
    402,269       284,887       388,201       398,157       485,214       695,230       797,057  
                                           
   
Net interest income
    715,154       655,209       885,325       879,130       901,709       822,491       718,512  
Provision for loan losses
    82,268       78,140       105,658       119,681       136,331       106,241       65,578  
                                           
   
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    632,886       577,069       779,667       759,449       765,378       716,250       652,934  

9



Table of Contents

                                                             
    Nine Months Ended    
    September 30,   For the Year Ended December 31,
         
    2005   2004   2004   2003   2002   2001   2000
                             
    (Unaudited)                    
    (In thousands except per share data)
Noninterest income:
                                                       
 
Service charges on deposit accounts
    220,024       210,723       282,808       241,419       191,642       155,008       127,476  
 
Card and merchant processing fees
    70,100       55,139       75,548       60,067       51,220       39,523       29,242  
 
Insurance commissions
    45,182       39,180       51,437       44,024       21,452       4,110        
 
Retail investment sales
    25,977       24,151       31,316       27,440       26,105       23,397       18,474  
 
Asset management fees
    21,093       16,898       22,666       21,994       20,149       20,614       20,117  
 
Corporate & correspondent investment sales
    16,391       15,220       20,457       28,957       25,997       22,263       8,097  
 
Bank owned life insurance
    12,852       12,427       17,169       16,928       18,839       18,564       8,356  
 
Trading gain (losses) and settlements on economic hedge swaps
    669       15,067       11,053       9,320       71,006       9,657        
 
Investment securities gains (losses), net
    79       27,336       27,336       (43 )     4,233       7,583       4  
 
Gain on sale of business
    4,791                                      
 
Other
    74,734       63,170       88,853       85,398       81,426       85,316       93,430  
                                           
   
Total noninterest income
    491,892       479,311       628,643       535,504       512,069       386,035       305,196  
Noninterest expense:
                                                       
 
Salaries, benefits and commissions
    363,085       340,528       458,356       429,486       391,056       346,275       304,921  
 
Equipment
    61,277       56,602       76,169       72,302       65,429       60,137       52,812  
 
Net occupancy
    50,521       49,623       65,791       61,607       57,137       53,294       46,199  
 
Professional services
    44,388       40,154       57,380       56,518       53,146       46,095       37,799  
 
Marketing
    33,866       28,885       33,249       31,946       28,290       19,634       13,231  
 
Communications
    16,323       16,607       21,859       24,548       22,140       19,402       16,791  
 
Amortization of intangibles
    4,656       4,871       6,543       7,302       9,175       24,709       23,802  
 
Merger and integration
    923       778       1,275       1,853       2,842       7,131       8,896  
 
Loss on prepayment of FHLB advances
          25,136       25,136                          
 
Other
    96,824       90,645       122,720       112,321       123,214       109,093       94,834  
                                           
   
Total noninterest expense
    671,863       653,829       868,478       797,883       752,429       685,770       599,285  
                                           
   
Net income before income tax expense
    452,915       402,551       539,832       497,070       525,018       416,515       358,845  
Income tax expense
    153,223       134,595       179,647       168,392       180,673       142,183       117,222  
                                           
   
Net income
  $ 299,692     $ 267,956     $ 360,185     $ 328,678     $ 344,345     $ 274,332     $ 241,623  
                                           
Basic earnings per share
  $ 2.42     $ 2.19     $ 2.95     $ 2.64     $ 2.70     $ 2.16     $ 1.91  
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
    123,619       122,153       122,254       124,656       127,575       127,617       126,514  
Diluted earnings per share
  $ 2.37     $ 2.14     $ 2.87     $ 2.58     $ 2.65     $ 2.14     $ 1.90  
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
    126,487       125,218       125,416       127,186       129,850       129,138       127,261  
Dividends per share
  $ 1.05     $ 0.94     $ 1.25     $ 1.12     $ 1.00     $ 0.92     $ 0.88  

10



Table of Contents

COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets and Other Information
                                                             
    As of and for the Nine    
    Months Ended September 30,   As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
         
    2005   2004   2004   2003   2002   2001   2000
                             
    (Unaudited)                    
    (In thousands except per share data)
Common Stock:
                                                       
 
Period end shares outstanding
    124,510       122,774       123,264       122,086       126,116       126,801       127,779  
 
Weighted-average shares basic
    123,619       122,153       122,254       124,656       127,575       127,617       126,514  
 
Dilutive effect of stock options
    2,868       3,065       3,162       2,530       2,275       1,521       747  
 
Weighted-average shares diluted
    126,487       125,218       125,416       127,186       129,850       129,138       127,261  
 
Book value per share (period end)
  $ 17.95     $ 16.31     $ 16.68     $ 15.50     $ 15.58     $ 13.56     $ 11.82  
Balance Sheet Data:
                                                       
 
Period End:
                                                       
   
Loans
    20,841,790       18,419,986       18,856,922       17,365,802       16,481,320       13,707,286       12,258,754  
   
Earning assets
    27,776,619       25,639,403       26,090,878       24,764,119       21,772,650       21,019,047       18,949,369  
   
Total assets
    30,133,835       27,783,239       28,181,916       26,963,113       23,925,589       23,015,000       20,877,160  
   
Non-interest bearing demand deposits
    6,085,377       5,319,272       5,476,140       4,627,153       3,964,471       3,576,289       3,188,969  
   
Interest-bearing deposits
    12,748,849       11,174,340       11,566,592       11,060,479       11,163,082       10,159,925       11,636,408  
   
Total deposits
    18,834,226       16,493,612       17,042,732       15,687,632       15,127,553       13,736,214       14,825,377  
   
Long-term debt
    4,119,969       4,125,065       4,119,771       4,794,935       4,853,816       3,830,192       2,585,185  
   
Shareholder’s equity
    2,234,577       2,002,791       2,056,345       1,842,574       1,965,383       1,719,576       1,510,004  
 
Average:
                                                       
   
Loans
    19,680,413       17,763,080       17,999,355       16,796,188       15,100,844       13,008,761       12,112,471  
   
Earning assets
    26,833,306       25,330,605       25,482,185       23,054,327       21,403,835       20,089,964       18,189,409  
   
Total assets
    29,138,273       27,490,389       27,660,628       25,142,719       23,354,327       21,992,587       19,800,819  
   
Non-interest bearing demand deposits
    5,632,093       4,861,393       4,999,763       4,185,527       3,527,777       3,142,164       2,889,724  
   
Interest-bearing deposits
    12,524,665       11,330,685       11,413,939       10,806,323       10,612,323       10,618,857       11,414,876  
   
Total deposits
    18,156,758       16,192,078       16,413,702       14,991,850       14,140,100       13,761,021       14,304,600  
   
Long-term debt and other borrowings
    4,159,890       4,793,760       4,625,224       4,819,274       4,557,026       3,334,731       2,375,524  
   
Shareholder’s equity
    2,152,890       1,944,971       1,968,948       1,965,710       1,910,148       1,661,779       1,353,387  
Asset Quality:
                                                       
 
Allowance for loan losses
    260,512       256,038       258,339       244,882       232,830       191,393       167,288  
 
Allowance for loan losses to period end loans
    1.25 %     1.39 %     1.37 %     1.41 %     1.41 %     1.40 %     1.36 %
 
Net loan charge-offs
    67,906       66,393       91,610       104,267       94,894       81,086       57,061  
 
Net loan charge-offs to average loans
    0.46 %     0.50 %     0.51 %     0.62 %     0.63 %     0.62 %     0.47 %
   
Nonperforming loans
    50,968       48,498       50,681       66,088       81,709       65,797       86,252  
   
Other real estate
    12,796       25,778       19,998       29,014       17,300       26,478       15,476  
 
Non-performing assets
    63,764       74,276       70,679       95,102       99,009       92,275       101,728  
 
Total nonperforming loans to loans
    0.24 %     0.26 %     0.27 %     0.38 %     0.50 %     0.48 %     0.70 %
 
Total nonperforming assets to loans and ORE
    0.31 %     0.40 %     0.37 %     0.55 %     0.60 %     0.67 %     0.83 %

11



Table of Contents

                                                           
    As of and for the Nine    
    Months Ended September 30,   As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
         
    2005   2004   2004   2003   2002   2001   2000
                             
    (Unaudited)                    
    (In thousands except per share data)
Consolidated Capital Ratios:
                                                       
 
Tier I risk-based capital ratio
    8.82 %     9.06 %     9.14 %     9.19 %     9.60 %     8.27 %     8.33 %
 
Total risk-based capital ratio
    11.59 %     11.14 %     11.17 %     11.62 %     12.49 %     10.94 %     11.24 %
 
Leverage ratio
    7.79 %     7.42 %     7.55 %     7.33 %     7.97 %     6.71 %     6.90 %
 
Average shareholder’s equity to average total assets
    7.39 %     7.08 %     7.12 %     7.82 %     8.18 %     7.56 %     6.84 %
Performance Ratios:
                                                       
 
Return on average assets
    1.38 %     1.30 %     1.30 %     1.31 %     1.47 %     1.25 %     1.22 %
 
Return on average equity
    18.61 %     18.40 %     18.29 %     16.72 %     18.03 %     16.51 %     17.85 %
 
Net yield on average earning assets
    3.57 %     3.47 %     3.49 %     3.85 %     4.26 %     4.13 %     3.95 %
 
Dividend payout ratio
    44.30 %     43.81 %     43.55 %     43.41 %     37.74 %     42.99 %     46.32 %
 
TexasBanc
      We are providing the following information to aid you in your analysis of the financial aspects of the merger. The following selected historical financial data is derived from TexasBanc’s audited financial statements as of and for the five years ended December 31, 2004 and TexasBanc’s unaudited quarterly financial statements as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004. This information is only a summary.
TexasBanc Holding Co.
                                                         
    Nine Months Ended    
    September 30,   For the Year Ended December 31,
         
    2005   2004   2004   2003   2002   2001   2000
                             
    (Unaudited)                    
Book value per share
  $ 709.69     $ 604.09     $ 627.13     $ 546.38     $ 485.25     $ 401.36     $ 337.51  
Dividends per share
  $     $     $     $     $     $     $  
Net income per share
  $ 88.26     $ 60.65     $ 85.86     $ 67.92     $ 65.60     $ 59.31     $ 48.39  

12



Table of Contents

 
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER AND THE SPECIAL MEETING
About the Merger
Q: What am I voting on?
 
A: Compass and TexasBanc have entered into an agreement and plan of merger by which Compass has agreed to acquire TexasBanc. You are being asked to vote to approve the agreement and plan of merger through which XYZ Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Compass, sometimes referred to as “Merger Sub.” will merge with and into TexasBanc and subsequently TexasBanc will merge with and into Compass.
 
Certain of you (generally all shareholders other than those who have payments or benefits that are subject to the shareholder vote) are also being asked to approve payments to certain executive officers that may be deemed “parachute payments” under Section 280G of the Code, referred to as “280G Payments,” in order to satisfy the shareholder approval exception provided under Section 280G of the Code.
 
Q: What will I receive in exchange for my shares of TexasBanc common stock?
 
A: If the merger is completed, you will receive, at your election (but subject to proration and adjustment as provided in the agreement and plan of merger), cash or shares of Compass common stock, in either case, having a value equal to $1,252.97 plus the product of 26.6987 multiplied by the average closing price of Compass common stock for the ten trading days immediately before completion of the merger, for each share of TexasBanc common stock you hold immediately before the completion date of the merger. These calculations of the merger consideration assume that 2,264 shares of TexasBanc common stock will be issued on exercise of outstanding TexasBanc stock options. In no event will Compass issue more than 4,938,206 shares of Compass common stock or pay more than $231.75 million in cash in merger consideration, including if there are more than 2,264 shares of TexasBanc common stock issued as a result of the exercise of TexasBanc stock options, and the consideration payable to each shareholder will be proportionately reduced if necessary to give effect to these limits. As explained in more detail in “The Agreement and Plan of Merger — Merger Consideration” beginning on page 51, if you are a TexasBanc shareholder, whether you make a cash election or a stock election, the value of the consideration that you will receive upon completion of the merger will be the same.
 
All cash elections and stock elections are subject to proration and adjustment as described in “The Agreement and Plan of Merger — Merger Consideration” beginning on page 51 of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
 
Q: Will I be able to trade the Compass common stock that I receive in the merger?
 
A: Yes. The Compass common stock issued in the merger will be traded on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol “CBSS.” You may sell the shares of Compass common stock you receive in the merger without restriction unless, under United States securities laws, you are considered an “affiliate” of TexasBanc at the time of the special meeting or become an “affiliate” of Compass as a result of the merger. Affiliates will need to comply with the restrictions described in the section titled “The Merger — Restrictions on Resale by Affiliates” beginning on page 62.
 
Q: What is the required vote to approve the agreement and plan of merger and the 280G Payments?
 
A: The holders of two-thirds of the outstanding shares of TexasBanc common stock as of December 30, 2005, the record date for the special meeting, must vote to approve the agreement and plan of merger in order for the merger to be completed. Abstentions from voting and “broker non-votes” are not considered affirmative votes and, therefore, will have the same practical effect as a vote against the merger. Holders of approximately 82% of the outstanding TexasBanc common stock have agreed with Compass to vote in favor of the agreement and plan of merger.

13



Table of Contents

Approval of the 280G Payments requires the affirmative vote of more than 75% of the voting power of all outstanding shares of TexasBanc capital stock, excluding those shares held or constructively owned by the executive officers whose compensation is being considered.
 
Q: Are Compass stockholders voting on the merger?
 
A: No vote of Compass stockholders is required to complete the merger.
 
Q: What does the TexasBanc board of directors recommend?
 
A: The board of directors of TexasBanc unanimously recommends that TexasBanc’s shareholders vote “FOR” the agreement and plan of merger.
 
The board of directors of TexasBanc (with Mr. Bryant abstaining) unanimously recommends that TexasBanc’s shareholders vote “FOR” the approval of the 280G Payments.
 
Q: Do I have dissenters’ or appraisal rights with respect to the merger?
 
A: Yes. Under Texas law, you have the right to dissent from the merger. To exercise dissenters’ rights of appraisal, or appraisal rights, you must strictly follow the procedures prescribed by the Texas Business Corporation Act, or TBCA. To review these procedures in more detail, see “The Agreement and Plan of Merger — Dissenters’ Rights” beginning on page 63 of this proxy statement/ prospectus and Appendix D.
 
Q: May I submit a form of election if I vote against the merger?
 
A: Yes. You may submit a form of election even if you vote against the agreement and plan of merger.
 
Q: What if I do not submit a properly completed form of election?
 
A: If you do not submit a properly completed form of election before the election deadline, you will be deemed not to have made an election. As a no election holder, you will be paid approximately equivalent per share to the amount paid per share to the holders making elections, but you may be paid in cash or Compass common stock, or a mix of cash or Compass common stock depending on the remaining cash and Compass common stock available for paying the merger consideration after honoring the cash elections and stock elections that other shareholders have made.
 
Q: When do you expect the merger to occur?
 
A: We expect to complete the merger promptly after TexasBanc’s shareholders approve the agreement and plan of merger at the special meeting and after the receipt of all requisite governmental and regulatory approvals, the expiration of applicable waiting periods and the satisfaction or waiver of all other conditions to the merger. We currently expect this to occur in the first quarter of 2006.
 
Q: Are there any risks I should consider in deciding whether I vote for the merger?
 
A: Yes. Set out under the heading of “Risk Factors,” beginning on page 17 of this document, a number of risk factors are listed that you should consider.
About the Special Meeting
Q: When and where is the TexasBanc special shareholders meeting?
 
A: The special meeting will be held at The Fort Worth Club, located at 306 West 7th Street 12th Floor, Fort Worth, Texas 76102 on Thursday, February 16, 2006, at 2:00 p.m., local time.
 
Q: Who is entitled to vote at the special meeting?
 
A: Holders of record of TexasBanc common stock at the close of business on December 30, 2005, which is the date TexasBanc’s board of directors has fixed as the record date for the special meeting, are entitled to vote at the special meeting.
 
Q: What do I need to do now?
 
A: Please mail your signed proxy card in the enclosed return envelope, as soon as possible, so your shares will be represented at the special meeting. In order to be sure that your vote is counted, please vote now even if you plan to attend the special meeting in person.

14



Table of Contents

Your proxy card will instruct the persons named on the proxy card to vote your shares at the special meeting as you direct. If you sign and send in your proxy card and do not indicate how you want to vote, your proxy will be voted “FOR” the approval of the agreement and plan of merger, and “FOR” the approval of the 280G Payments.
 
Q: May I change my vote after I have mailed my signed proxy card?
 
A: Yes. You may change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted at the special meeting. You may change your vote by submitting a new proxy with a later date or by voting in person at the special meeting. Alternatively, you may revoke your proxy altogether by notifying TexasBanc’s Secretary in writing before the special meeting that you have revoked your proxy.
 
Q: Why is it important for me to vote?
 
A: We cannot complete the merger without the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding shares of TexasBanc common stock as of the record date voting in favor of the agreement and plan of merger. If you do not vote or give instructions to your broker or bank to vote on your behalf, it will have the same effect as a vote against the merger.
 
Q: Should I send in my stock certificates with my proxy card?
 
A: No. Please do not send your stock certificates with your proxy card. At the time this proxy statement/ prospectus is mailed, an exchange agent will mail or deliver a form of election and transmittal materials. Before the election deadline, which is 5:00 p.m., New York time, on February 15, 2006, you should send your TexasBanc stock certificates to the exchange agent, together with a completed, signed election form provided to you.
About Electing the Merger Consideration
Q: How do I elect the type of the merger consideration that I prefer to receive?
 
A: Each TexasBanc shareholder is being sent an election form and transmittal materials at the time this proxy statement/ prospectus is being mailed. You must properly complete and deliver to the exchange agent the election materials, together with your TexasBanc stock certificates. A return envelope will be provided for submitting the election form and stock certificates to the exchange agent. This is different from the envelope that you will use to return your completed proxy card. Please do not send your TexasBanc stock certificates or form of election with your proxy card.
 
If your shares are held in a brokerage or other custodial account, you should receive instructions from the entity where your shares are held advising you of the procedures for making your election and delivering your shares. If you do not receive these instructions, you should contact the entity where your shares are held.
 
If the merger is not completed, any TexasBanc stock certificates that you previously sent to the exchange agent will be promptly returned to you without charge.
 
Q: Can I make one election for some of my shares and another election for the rest?
 
A: Yes. The election form permits you to specify, among the shares you are submitting, how many you are allocating to:
 
• a stock election,
 
• a cash election, or
 
• no election.

15



Table of Contents

Q: What if I do not make an election?
 
A: If you do not submit a properly completed and signed election form with your TexasBanc stock certificates to the exchange agent by the election deadline (or if you submit a properly completed election form indicating no election, together with the certificates representing all of your shares), then the consideration you will be entitled to receive in exchange for each of your shares of TexasBanc common stock will be determined by the proration and adjustment procedures described in “The Agreement and Plan of Merger — Merger Consideration” beginning on page 51 of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
 
If you do not properly submit your election form with your TexasBanc stock certificates by the election deadline, then, promptly after the closing date of the merger, the exchange agent will mail to you a letter of transmittal and instructions for surrendering your TexasBanc stock certificates for use in exchanging your TexasBanc stock certificates for the merger consideration.
 
Q: Can I change my election after I submit an election form?
 
A: Yes. You may revoke your election of merger consideration with respect to all or a portion of your shares of TexasBanc common stock by delivering written notice of your revocation to the exchange agent by the election deadline. If you instruct a broker to submit an election for your shares, you must follow your broker’s directions for changing those instructions.
 
If an election is properly revoked with respect to shares of TexasBanc common stock represented by stock certificates, the certificates representing such shares will be promptly returned upon written request of the holder who submitted them to the exchange agent.
 
You will not be entitled to revoke or change your election or sell your shares of TexasBanc common stock after the election deadline.
 
Q: Will I receive any fractional shares of Compass common stock as part of the merger consideration?
 
A: No. Compass will not issue fractional shares in the merger. As a result, the total number of shares of Compass common stock that you will receive in the merger will be rounded down to the nearest whole number. You will receive a cash payment for the value of any remaining fraction of a share of Compass common stock that you would otherwise have been entitled to receive.
 
Q: Will the 280G Payments affect the amount of merger consideration to be paid to TexasBanc shareholders?
 
A: No. TexasBanc shareholder action on this proposal, whether for or against, will not change the value or number of shares of Compass common stock or the amount of cash a TexasBanc shareholder will receive if the merger is completed.
How to Get More Information
Q: Who can help answer my questions?
 
A: If you have questions about the merger or about how to vote your shares, please call Charles Cox at TexasBanc at (817) 560-6481.
 
Q: Where can I find more information about Compass and TexasBanc?
 
A: You can find more information about Compass and TexasBanc from the various sources described under the heading “Where to Find More Information” beginning on page 94 of this proxy statement/ prospectus.

16



Table of Contents

 
RISK FACTORS
      In addition to the other information included or incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus, you should carefully read and consider the following factors in evaluating the proposals to be voted on at the special meeting and in deciding whether to elect to receive cash or shares of Compass common stock in the merger. Please also refer to the additional risk factors identified in the periodic reports and other documents of Compass incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus and listed in “Information About Compass — Incorporation of Documents by Reference” on page 78 and “Where You Can Find More Information” on page 94.
Because the market price of Compass common stock will fluctuate, TexasBanc’s shareholders cannot be sure of the value of the merger consideration they will receive.
      Upon completion of the merger, each share of TexasBanc common stock will be converted into Compass common stock or cash in accordance with the agreement and plan of merger. The value of the merger consideration to be received by TexasBanc’s shareholders will be based in part on the average closing prices of Compass common stock on the NASDAQ during the ten trading days ending on the day before the completion of the merger. This average price may vary from the closing price of Compass common stock on the date we announced the merger, on the date that this proxy statement/ prospectus is being mailed to TexasBanc’s shareholders, and on the date of the special meeting of TexasBanc’s shareholders. Any change in the market price of Compass common stock before completion of the merger will affect the value of the merger consideration that TexasBanc’s shareholders will receive upon completion of the merger. The price of Compass common stock may vary due to changes in the business, operations or prospects of Compass, any future issuances of debt or equity securities by Compass, market assessments of the merger, general market and economic conditions, regulatory considerations or other factors. Many of these factors are beyond our control.
      Accordingly, at the time of the special meeting, TexasBanc’s shareholders will not know or be able to calculate the amount of the cash consideration they would receive or the exchange ratio used to determine the number of any shares of Compass common stock they would receive upon completion of the merger. The merger may not be completed until a significant period of time has passed after the special meeting. The price of Compass common stock may decrease before the merger is completed.
      A decrease in the price of Compass common stock would reduce the amount of cash and value of Compass shares to be received with respect to each share of TexasBanc common stock. See “The Agreement and Plan of Merger — Merger Consideration” beginning on page 51 and the agreement and plan of merger attached to this document as Annex A for more detailed information regarding the merger consideration.
      Because the market price of Compass common stock may increase or decrease before the completion of the merger, Compass urges you to obtain current market quotations. Compass common stock is traded on the NASDAQ National Market under the trading symbol “CBSS.” No prediction can be made as to the market prices of Compass common stock at any time before or after the completion of the merger.
      In no event will Compass issue more than 4,938,206 shares of Compass common stock or pay more than $231.75 million in cash in merger consideration, including if there are more than 2,264 shares issued as a result of the exercise of TexasBanc stock options, and the consideration payable to each shareholder will be proportionately reduced if necessary to give effect to these limits. As of the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus, there were options to acquire 3,600 shares of TexasBanc common stock. All of the TexasBanc stock options had exercise prices below the value of the merger consideration as of the date of this proxy statement. Because TexasBanc option holders can pay the exercise price of their TexasBanc stock options either in cash or by surrendering shares of TexasBanc common stock, the exact number of shares to be issued as a result of the exercise of TexasBanc stock options will not be known until immediately before the closing of the merger.

17



Table of Contents

We may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the merger.
      The success of the merger will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated cost savings from combining certain aspects of the businesses of Compass and TexasBanc. However, to realize the anticipated benefits from the merger, we must successfully combine the businesses of Compass and TexasBanc in a manner that permits those cost savings to be realized. The anticipated benefits of the merger also depend on the continued operating performance of TexasBanc’s businesses after the merger. If we are not able to combine the businesses of Compass and TexasBanc in a manner that permits the anticipated cost savings to be realized, or if TexasBanc’s businesses do not perform as anticipated after the merger, the anticipated benefits of the merger may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected.
      Compass and TexasBanc have operated and, until the completion of the merger, will continue to operate, independently. It is possible that the integration process could result in the loss of key employees, the disruption of each company’s ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies that adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with clients, customers, depositors and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger.
TexasBanc shareholders may receive a form of consideration different from what they elect.
      Although each TexasBanc shareholder may elect to receive all cash or all Compass common stock in the merger, the cash available for all TexasBanc shareholders (including persons who receive their shares as a result of the exercise of options) is fixed at $231.75 million and the number of shares of Compass common stock is fixed at 4,938,206 shares. As a result, if either the aggregate cash or stock elections exceed the maximum available, and you choose the consideration election that exceeds the maximum available, you will receive a portion of your consideration in cash and a portion of your consideration in Compass common stock.
The opinion obtained by TexasBanc from its financial advisor will not reflect subsequent changes.
      Sandler O’Neill, the financial advisor to TexasBanc, has delivered a “fairness opinion” to the board of directors of TexasBanc. The opinion which is dated September 17, 2005, states that, based upon and subject to the assumptions and limitations on review set forth in the opinion, the merger consideration to be paid to TexasBanc shareholders is fair, from a financial point of view, to those shareholders. The opinion does not reflect changes that may occur or may have occurred after the date of this opinion, including changes to the operations and prospects of Compass or TexasBanc, changes in general market and economic conditions or regulatory or other factors. Any such changes, or other factors on which the opinion is based, may alter the relative value of Compass and TexasBanc.
TexasBanc will be subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the merger is pending.
      Uncertainty about the effect of the merger on employees and customers may have an adverse effect on TexasBanc and consequently on Compass. These uncertainties may impair TexasBanc’s ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel until the merger is consummated, and could cause customers and others that deal with TexasBanc to seek to change existing business relationships with TexasBanc. Retention of certain employees may be challenging while the merger is pending, as certain employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles with Compass. If key employees depart because of issues relating to the uncertainty and difficulty of integration or a desire not to remain with Compass, Compass’ business after the merger could be harmed. In addition, the agreement and plan of merger restricts TexasBanc from making certain acquisitions and taking other specified actions until the merger occurs. These restrictions may prevent TexasBanc from pursuing attractive business opportunities that may arise before the completion of the merger. Please see the section entitled “The Agreement and Plan of Merger — Conduct of TexasBanc Business Pending the Merger” beginning on page 56 of this proxy statement/ prospectus for a description of the restrictive covenants to which TexasBanc is subject.

18



Table of Contents

Some of the directors and executive officers of TexasBanc may have interests and arrangements that may have influenced their decisions to support or recommend that you approve the merger.
      The interests of some of the directors and executive officers of TexasBanc may be different from those of TexasBanc’s shareholders, and directors and officers of TexasBanc may be participants in arrangements that are different from, or in addition to, those of TexasBanc’s shareholders. These interests are described in more detail in the section of this proxy statement/ prospectus entitled “Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger” beginning on page 44.
The agreement and plan of merger limits TexasBanc’s ability to pursue alternatives to the merger.
      The agreement and plan of merger contains provisions that limit TexasBanc’s ability to discuss competing third-party proposals to acquire all or a significant part of TexasBanc. See “The Agreement and Plan of Merger — Conduct of TexasBanc Business Pending the Merger” beginning on page 56 of this proxy statement/ prospectus. These provisions might discourage a potential competing acquirer that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of TexasBanc from considering or proposing that acquisition even if it were prepared to pay consideration with a higher per share market price than that proposed in the merger, or might result in a potential competing acquirer proposing to pay a lower per share price to acquire TexasBanc than it might otherwise have proposed to pay.
The shares of Compass common stock to be received by TexasBanc’s shareholders as a result of the merger will have different rights from the shares of TexasBanc common stock.
      The rights associated with TexasBanc’s common stock are different from the rights associated with Compass common stock. See the section of this proxy statement/ prospectus entitled “Comparison of Shareholders Rights” on page 86 for a discussion of the different rights associated with Compass common stock.
If the merger is not completed by June 1, 2006, either Compass or TexasBanc may choose not to proceed with the merger.
      Either Compass or TexasBanc may terminate the agreement and plan of merger if the merger has not been completed by June 1, 2006, unless the failure of the merger to have been completed has resulted from the failure of the party seeking to terminate the agreement and plan of merger to have performed its obligations. See “The Agreement and Plan of Merger — Termination of the Agreement and Plan of Merger,” beginning on page 61 of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
The merger may fail to qualify as a reorganization for federal income tax purposes, resulting in your recognition of taxable gain or loss in respect of your shares of TexasBanc common stock and resulting in corporate tax liability for Compass.
      Compass and TexasBanc intend the merger to qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, although the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, will not provide a ruling on the matter. TexasBanc and Compass each will, as a condition to closing, obtain an opinion from counsel that the merger will constitute a reorganization for federal income tax purposes. These opinions do not bind the IRS or prevent the IRS from adopting a contrary position. If the merger fails to qualify as a reorganization, the merger will be treated for tax purposes as a taxable sale of TexasBanc’s assets to Compass followed by a liquidation of TexasBanc, with Compass as TexasBanc’s successor liable for the associated corporate tax from the sale of assets. In such circumstances, you generally would recognize gain or loss on each share of TexasBanc common stock surrendered in an amount equal to the difference between your adjusted tax basis in that share and the sum of the amount of cash and the fair market value of the Compass common stock received in exchange for that share in the liquidation.

19



Table of Contents

Regulatory approvals may not be received, may take longer than expected or may impose conditions which are not presently anticipated.
      The merger must be approved by the Federal Reserve (or that approval must be waived) and the Texas Department of Insurance. In addition, Compass must give notice of the merger to the Texas Department of Banking. The Federal Reserve will consider, among other factors, the competitive impact of the merger, the financial and managerial resources of our companies and their subsidiary banks and the convenience and needs of the communities to be served. As part of that consideration, we expect that the Federal Reserve will review capital position, safety and soundness, and legal and regulatory compliance, including compliance with anti-money laundering laws.
      There can be no assurance as to whether this and other regulatory approvals will be received, the timing of those approvals, or whether any conditions will be imposed.
      The agreement and plan of merger permits Compass to make acquisitions and dispositions and to issue capital stock in connection therewith if such transactions do not present a material risk that the completion of the merger will be materially delayed or that any required regulatory approvals will be materially more difficult to obtain.
TexasBanc’s shareholders will have less influence as a shareholder of Compass than as a shareholder of TexasBanc.
      You currently have the right to vote in the election of the board of directors of TexasBanc and on other matters affecting TexasBanc. The merger will transfer control of TexasBanc to Compass. If the merger occurs, you will become a stockholder of Compass with a percentage ownership of Compass that is much smaller than your percentage ownership of TexasBanc. Because of this, you will no longer be able to influence the management policies of TexasBanc’s operations (to the extent you were able to do so before the merger), and as a stockholder of Compass with a small ownership percentage you will not be able to influence the management policies of Compass.
Changes in the economy may negatively affect Compass’ business and stock price.
      General economic conditions impact the banking industry. The credit quality of Compass’ loan portfolio reflects the general economic conditions where it does business. The continued financial success of Compass and its subsidiaries depends on things beyond Compass’ control, like national and local economic conditions, the supply and demand for investable funds, interest rates and federal, state and local laws. Any deterioration in any of these conditions could have a material adverse effect on Compass’ financial condition and results of operations, which would probably negatively affect the market price of Compass common stock. See “Price Range of Common Stock and Dividends” on page 75.
Unanticipated costs relating to the merger could reduce Compass’ future earnings per share.
      Compass believes it has reasonably estimated the likely costs of integrating the operations of TexasBanc into Compass and the incremental costs of operating as a combined company. However, it is possible that unexpected transaction costs such as taxes, fees or professional expenses or unexpected future operating expenses such as increased personnel costs or increased taxes, as well as other types of unanticipated adverse developments, could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial condition of Compass after the merger. If unexpected costs are incurred, the merger could have a significant dilutive effect on Compass’ earnings per share. In other words, if the merger is completed and Compass incurs unexpected costs and expenses as a result of the merger, Compass believes that the earnings per share of Compass common stock could be less than they would have been if the merger had not been completed.

20



Table of Contents

 
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
      This proxy statement/ prospectus and the filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, that are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus contain or incorporate by reference forward-looking statements that have been made pursuant to the provisions of, and in reliance on the safe harbor under, the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “could,” “should,” “will,” “projects,” “estimates” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements. In that event, TexasBanc’s or Compass’ business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected, and investors in TexasBanc’s or Compass’ securities could lose part or all of their investment. Additional factors that could cause Compass’ results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements can be found in Compass’ Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the SEC. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus or, in the case of documents incorporated by reference, the date referenced in those documents. We are not obligated to update these statements or publicly release the result of any revision to them to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus or, in the case of documents incorporated by reference, the date referenced in those documents, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
      You should understand that the following important factors, in addition to those discussed elsewhere in this document and in the documents which are incorporated by reference, could affect the future results of Compass and TexasBanc, and of the combined company after the merger, and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements:
  •  the businesses of Compass and TexasBanc may not be combined successfully, or such combination may take longer, be more difficult, time-consuming or costly to accomplish than expected, in particular with respect to the integration of information technology systems;
 
  •  the expected growth opportunities and cost savings from the merger may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected;
 
  •  operating costs, customer losses and business disruption before or after the merger, including adverse effects on relationships with employees, may be greater than expected;
 
  •  governmental approvals of the merger may not be obtained, or adverse regulatory conditions may be imposed in connection with governmental approvals of the merger;
 
  •  the shareholders of TexasBanc may fail to approve the merger;
 
  •  Compass’ and TexasBanc’s ability to successfully execute their business plans and achieve their objectives;
 
  •  changes in political and general economic conditions, including the economic effects of terrorist attacks against the United States and elsewhere and related events;
 
  •  changes in financial market conditions, either nationally or locally in areas in which Compass or TexasBanc conduct their operations, including reduced rates of business formation and growth, commercial real estate development and real estate prices;
 
  •  fluctuations in the equity and fixed-income markets;
 
  •  changes in interest rates, the quality and composition of the loan or securities portfolios, demand for loan products, deposit flows and competition;
 
  •  acquisitions and integration of acquired businesses;

21



Table of Contents

  •  increases in the levels of losses, customer bankruptcies, claims and assessments;
 
  •  changes in fiscal, monetary, regulatory, trade and tax policies and laws, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve;
 
  •  continuing consolidation in the financial services industry; new litigation or changes in existing litigation;
 
  •  success in gaining regulatory approvals, when required;
 
  •  changes in consumer spending and savings habits;
 
  •  increased competitive challenges and expanding product and pricing pressures among financial institutions;
 
  •  demand for financial services in Compass’ or TexasBanc’s market areas;
 
  •  inflation and deflation;
 
  •  technological changes and Compass’ and TexasBanc’s implementation of new technologies;
 
  •  Compass’ and TexasBanc’s abilities to develop and maintain secure and reliable information technology systems;
 
  •  legislation or regulatory changes, which adversely affect the ability of Compass or TexasBanc to conduct the businesses in which they are engaged;
 
  •  Compass’ and TexasBanc’s ability to comply with applicable laws and regulations;
 
  •  and changes in accounting policies, procedures or guidelines as may be required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or regulatory agencies.

22



Table of Contents

 
SPECIAL MEETING
      This section contains information from TexasBanc for TexasBanc’s shareholders about the special meeting TexasBanc has called to consider and approve (1) the agreement and plan of merger, as it may be amended from time to time, and (2) the 280G Payments. We are mailing this proxy statement/ prospectus to you, as a TexasBanc shareholder, on or about January 19, 2006. Together with this proxy statement/ prospectus, we are also sending to you a notice of the special meeting and a form of proxy card that TexasBanc’s board of directors is soliciting for use at the special meeting. The special meeting will be held on Thursday, February 16, 2006, at 2:00 p.m., local time, at The Fort Worth Club, located at 306 West 7th Street 12th Floor, Fort Worth, Texas 76102.
      This proxy statement/ prospectus is also being furnished by Compass to TexasBanc’s shareholders as a prospectus in connection with the issuance by Compass of shares of Compass common stock upon completion of the merger.
 
Time and Place of Special Meeting
      The special meeting of TexasBanc shareholders is to be held on Thursday, February 16, 2006, at 2:00 p.m., local time, at The Fort Worth Club, located at 306 West 7th Street 12th Floor, Fort Worth, Texas 76102.
 
Matters to be Considered at the Special Meeting
      The purpose of the special meeting is to consider and approve (1) the agreement and plan of merger, as it may be amended from time to time, and (2) the 280G Payments. The merger cannot occur unless the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding shares of TexasBanc common stock as of the record date vote in favor of the agreement and plan of merger.
 
Record Date for the Special Meeting and Voting Rights
      Only holders of record of TexasBanc’s common stock at the close of business on the record date, December 30, 2005, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting. At the close of business on the record date, there were 182,696 shares of TexasBanc common stock outstanding held by 154 holders of record. Each holder of record of TexasBanc’s common stock on the record date will be entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters to be voted upon at the special meeting.
      As of the record date, holders of approximately 82% of the outstanding TexasBanc common stock have agreed with Compass to vote in favor of the agreement and plan of merger.
 
Required Votes
      Proposal 1. Approval of the agreement and plan of merger requires the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the shares of TexasBanc common stock outstanding as of the record date.
      Proposal 2. Approval of the 280G Payments requires the affirmative vote of more than 75% of the voting power of all outstanding shares of TexasBanc capital stock, excluding those shares held or constructively owned by the executive officers whose compensation is being considered.
 
Quorum; Abstention and Broker Non-Votes
      The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of TexasBanc common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes (which are signed proxies returned by a broker that indicate that the broker has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares and does not have discretionary authority to vote the shares) will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists.
      All properly completed and signed proxies delivered and not properly revoked will be voted at the special meeting in the manner specified in those proxies. If you do not specify a choice, your shares represented by an

23



Table of Contents

authorized proxy will be voted “FOR” the approval of the agreement and plan of merger and “FOR” the approval of 280G Payments. The failure to submit a vote by proxy or in person at the special meeting, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” each of the proposals presented.
 
Voting By Proxy
Voting Your Proxy
      You may vote in person at the special meeting or by proxy. We recommend you vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the special meeting. You can change your vote at the special meeting.
      You may vote by proxy by completing and mailing the enclosed proxy card. If you properly submit your proxy in time to vote, one of the individuals named as your proxy will vote your shares of common stock as you have directed. You may vote for or against the proposals submitted at the special meeting or you may abstain from voting.
      TEXASBANC’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER AND “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE 280G PAYMENTS (WITH VERNON BRYANT ABSTAINING).
How to Vote
      If you are a shareholder of record and you hold shares of TexasBanc common stock in your name, you may vote by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided.
      If you hold shares of TexasBanc common stock through a broker or other custodian, please follow the voting instructions that the applicable institution provides to you. If you do not return your proxy card those shares will not be voted at the special meeting.
      If you submit your proxy but do not make specific choices, your proxy will be voted “FOR” each of the proposals presented, and at the discretion of the proxy holders with respect to any other business properly brought before the meeting.
Revoking Your Proxy
      If you hold shares registered in your name and you wish to change any proxy granted on the proxy card, you may revoke your proxy before it is voted by:
  •  submitting a new proxy with a later date;
 
  •  notifying TexasBanc’s Secretary, Lisanne Davidson, 2525 Ridgmar Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas 76116, in writing before the special meeting that you have revoked your proxy; or
 
  •  voting in person at the special meeting.
Other Voting Matters
      Voting in Person. If you are a registered holder and plan to attend the special meeting to vote in person, you will be given a ballot at the special meeting.
      People with Disabilities. TexasBanc can provide reasonable assistance to help you participate in the special meeting if you tell us about your disability and how you plan to attend. Please call or write TexasBanc’s Secretary at least ten days before the special meeting at the number or address provided on the inside front cover page of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
      Expenses of Proxy Solicitation. TexasBanc will assume the cost of solicitation of proxies from you. In addition to solicitation by mail, TexasBanc’s directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies from shareholders by telephone, facsimile or in person; however, they will not be paid any additional compensation for such services.

24



Table of Contents

      DO NOT SEND IN ANY TEXASBANC STOCK CERTIFICATES WITH YOUR PROXY CARD. At the time of the mailing of this proxy statement/ prospectus you are also being mailed or delivered an election form and other materials relating to your right to elect the form of merger consideration under the agreement and plan of merger and will be requested to send in your TexasBanc stock certificates together with the properly completed election form.
 
Other Business, Adjournment and Postponements
      Under the TBCA and TexasBanc’s Bylaws, only the business that is specified in the “Notice of Special Meeting of Shareholders” may be presented at the special meeting, and no other matters may properly be brought before the special meeting.
      Any adjournment or postponement may be made from time to time by approval of the holders of common stock representing a majority of the votes present in person or by proxy at the special meeting, whether or not a quorum exists, without further notice other than by an announcement made at the special meeting. If a quorum is not present at the special meeting, TexasBanc’s shareholders may be asked to vote on a proposal to adjourn or postpone the special meeting to solicit additional proxies. If a quorum is present at the special meeting, but there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the agreement and plan of merger, TexasBanc’s shareholders may also be asked to vote on a proposal to approve the adjournment or postponement of the special meeting to permit further solicitation of proxies.

25



Table of Contents

 
PROPOSAL 1. APPROVAL OF THE AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER — THE MERGER
      The following description of the material information about the merger and the description of the opinion of TexasBanc’s financial advisor, is qualified in its entirety by reference to the more detailed appendices to this proxy statement/ prospectus. We urge you to read all of the appendices to this proxy statement/ prospectus in their entirety.
 
General
      TexasBanc’s board of directors has approved and adopted the agreement and plan of merger. The agreement and plan of merger provides for combining our companies through the merger of a newly formed, wholly-owned subsidiary of Compass with and into TexasBanc, and the subsequent merger of TexasBanc into Compass.
      TexasBanc’s shareholders will be entitled to elect to receive upon completion of the merger shares of Compass common stock or cash, subject to potential proration and adjustment, for each share of TexasBanc’s common stock. Shares of Compass common stock issued and outstanding at the time the merger is completed will remain outstanding and those stock certificates will be unaffected by the merger. Compass’ common stock will continue to trade on the NASDAQ National Market under the Compass Bancshares, Inc. name with the symbol “CBSS” after the merger.
      Please see “The Agreement and Plan of Merger beginning on page 50 for additional and more detailed information regarding the legal documents that govern the merger, including information about the conditions to the merger and the provisions for terminating or amending the agreement and plan of merger.
 
Background of the Merger
      During the last several years, there have been significant developments in the banking and financial services industry. These developments have included the increased emphasis and dependence on automation, specialization of products and services, increased competition from other financial institutions and a trend toward consolidation and geographic expansion, coupled with a relaxation of regulatory restrictions on interstate conduct of business of financial institutions. As short-term interest rates have risen since June 2004, financial institutions have been experiencing compressing net interest margins, while at the same time facing higher costs to attract and maintain quality officers and employees. In addition, in response to the attacks on September 11, 2001, financial institutions have been experiencing increased regulatory oversight and potential liability for failure to comply with legislative initiatives to prevent terrorism and money laundering.
      Mindful of these factors, the board of directors and management of TexasBanc have periodically reviewed and updated strategic plans for TexasBanc. As part of this ongoing process, TexasBanc has historically received inquiries regarding its willingness to consider an acquisition by, or affiliation with, larger financial institutions. Consistent with its fiduciary obligations to its shareholders, TexasBanc has considered such inquiries and evaluated them with respect to the level and form of consideration proposed, and the seriousness and specificity that has been conveyed to TexasBanc in terms of consideration, as well as the expected future operation of TexasBanc, and other considerations and factors deemed relevant by TexasBanc, in formulating its business plan with the intent to provide maximum value to its shareholders.
      As the nature of banking has become increasingly competitive, larger organizations have demonstrated a willingness to pay for a premium franchise in a high-growth market, such as Fort Worth. In considering the market conditions, TexasBanc felt it was appropriate to consult with investment banking firms experienced in the area of financial institution mergers and acquisitions to evaluate the prospects of potentially accomplishing a transaction that would both maximize shareholder value and continue to provide its customers with quality products and services.
      In the second quarter of 2005, Bill Knight, TexasBanc’s Chairman of the Board, began to consider seriously alternative transactions to maximizing the value of TexasBanc’s shareholders’ investment and concluded the most viable alternative was to seek a merger partner for TexasBanc. In April, 2005, after a number of informal discussions with members of TexasBanc’s board of directors, Mr. Knight invited

26



Table of Contents

representatives of Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P. to visit TexasBanc to discuss the role of Sandler O’Neill as TexasBanc’s potential financial adviser regarding the exploration of strategic options for TexasBanc, including a possible sale or strategic business combination involving TexasBanc.
      After this meeting, TexasBanc briefly considered a business combination with a financial institution that is smaller in size than Texas Banc. On May 19, 2005, Mr. Knight, Vernon Bryant, TexasBanc’s President, and Buzz Brightbill, a member of TexasBank’s board of directors, met with a representative of Sandler O’Neill to discuss this potential business combination. A confidentiality agreement between TexasBanc and that smaller institution was signed on June 1, 2005. In the three weeks that followed, representatives of TexasBanc and Sandler O’Neill analyzed the potential financial implications of such a combination and discussed the potential combination with members of the other institution’s management and its financial advisors. Ultimately, TexasBanc decided that a combination with the other financial institution would not maximize the value of Texas Banc’s shareholders’ investment and was not in the best interests of its shareholders.
      On June 30, 2005, Mr. Knight, Mr. Bryant, Charles Cox, TexasBanc’s Treasurer, and representatives of TexasBanc’s outside legal counsel, Jenkens & Gilchrist, a Professional Corporation, met with representatives of Sandler O’Neill to discuss the process by which Sandler would solicit indications of interest regarding a possible business combination with TexasBanc. Sandler O’Neill presented a proposed timeline, a preliminary list of potential interested parties, a financial summary of Texas commercial bank acquisitions since January 1, 2002, and a list of due diligence items needed by Sandler O’Neill to prepare confidential information materials to be presented to potential acquirers. Sandler O’Neill also circulated an initial draft of the confidential information memorandum to the persons present at that meeting. Over the subsequent four weeks, management of TexasBanc worked with Sandler O’Neill to revise the confidential information memorandum.
      On July 27, 2005, the TexasBanc board of directors met with representatives of Sandler O’Neill and Jenkens & Gilchrist. Sandler O’Neill made a presentation about the merger market for Texas banks and how TexasBanc’s franchise compared to other Texas banks. Sandler O’Neill then provided to TexasBanc’s board of directors its views on comparable mergers and acquisitions of financial institutions that had occurred and were occurring nationally and regionally, presented its perspective on potential bidders, and discussed the timing and mechanics of the proposed sale process along with a preliminary timetable for a possible sale or business combination involving TexasBanc. Thereafter, representatives from Jenkens & Gilchrist discussed with TexasBanc’s board of directors their responsibilities and fiduciary duties in the context of a merger.
      At that meeting, TexasBanc’s board of directors approved resolutions engaging Sandler O’Neill and Jenkens & Gilchrist to commence the sale process. TexasBanc and Sandler O’Neill signed an engagement letter later that day. TexasBanc selected Sandler O’Neill because of its expertise, reputation and familiarity with TexasBanc and the overall financial services industry and because its investment banking professionals have substantial experience in transactions comparable to the proposed merger.
      Beginning August 1, 2005, Sandler O’Neill contacted 32 financial institutions and other strategic investors who were, in Sandler O’Neill’s view, potential acquirers of TexasBanc. Of the parties contacted, 17 potential bidders signed confidentiality agreements that limited the use of the confidential information to an evaluation of a potential transaction with TexasBanc. These agreements further stipulated that a potential bidder neither attempt to acquire TexasBanc without negotiating the acquisition with TexasBanc’s board of directors nor solicit, hire, or divert any of TexasBanc’s employees for a period of time after the date thereof.
      Upon receipt of a signed confidentiality agreement from a potential acquirer, Sandler O’Neill sent the representatives of the interested party a confidential information memorandum containing certain public and non-public information regarding TexasBanc and instructions describing TexasBanc’s process to determine that party’s level of interest in acquiring TexasBanc. In those instructions, potential acquirers were asked to submit a non-binding indication of interest with respect to TexasBanc no later than August 19, 2005. Sandler O’Neill made clear to each potential acquirer that: (1) TexasBanc was in the process of exploring a number of alternatives to provide value to its shareholders, one of which could be its sale; (2) if they have an interest in pursuing such a transaction, they must participate in this process; (3) TexasBanc was not bound or obligated

27



Table of Contents

to continue discussions, enter into any agreement or continue the process; and (4) certain qualified bidders would be permitted to perform due diligence on TexasBanc to determine whether they wished to proceed in the process.
      From August 19, 2005 to August 22, 2005, TexasBanc received five bids from potential acquirors. On August 22, 2005, representatives of TexasBanc’s management met with Sandler O’Neill and Jenkens & Gilchrist to discuss the bids received and to select potential bidders who would be allowed to continue in the merger process. At that meeting, Sandler O’Neill was instructed to contact the two potential acquirers who submitted the most attractive offers (which included Compass) to inform them that they would be permitted to continue in the process.
      Sandler O’Neill was also instructed to contact a third potential acquirer, who had submitted a bid and indicated a range of prices to be paid as consideration and also requested an informal meeting with TexasBanc’s senior management before proceeding further in the process. Sandler O’Neill was instructed to inform the bidder that TexasBanc senior management would only meet with this third bidder, and the third bidder would only be permitted to continue the process, if the bidder confirmed that the consideration to be paid in the transaction would fall in the uppermost portion of the bidder’s range of proposed consideration. During their discussion with Sandler O’Neill, the third bidder’s advisor confirmed that its client would seriously consider proceeding with a bid in the uppermost portion of the proposed range of prices. Representatives of the third bidder and TexasBanc met on August 25, 2005, to discuss the third bidder’s continuing interest. On August 29, 2005, a representative of the third bidder contacted Mr. Bryant, to inform him that, due to a change in circumstances unrelated to TexasBanc, the third bidder did not wish to continue in the process.
      Sandler O’Neill was further instructed to contact a fourth bidder and inform the bidder that it would only be permitted to continue in the process if the bidder’s consideration to be paid in the transaction could be substantially increased and that the bidder would eliminate certain conditions outlined in its bid that were not required by any of the other bidders. Sandler O’Neill contacted the fourth bidder that same day, and the bidder submitted a revised offer in which it did increase its offer (although the revised offer was still less than the two highest offers) and eliminated the non-standard conditions. Subsequently, however, TexasBanc became concerned that this bidder would not be able to meet TexasBanc’s pricing expectations based on the two higher offers received and that this bidder would not be able to complete a transaction without raising a significant amount of additional capital, and TexasBanc ceased negotiations with this bidder before it conducted further due diligence.
      On August 28, 2005, TexasBanc opened an Internet-based data room, containing much of the information that the two bidders would require in connection with their due diligence. Additionally, during the week of August 29, 2005, the two interested parties, including Compass, conducting due diligence on TexasBanc at the offices of Jenkens & Gilchrist, including management interviews and a review of TexasBanc credit files.
      On September 6, 2005, Sandler O’Neill sent the remaining potential acquirers a letter requesting each to submit to Sandler O’Neill a final offer for TexasBanc. The letter instructed each potential acquirer that the final bid should be received by September 9, 2005 and the bids should include the following information: the final proposed amount of consideration, describing the form of consideration; whether further due diligence would be required, and if so, the extent necessary; a description of how the bid would be financed; and a description of the post-acquisition operations of TexasBanc, including a commitment to assume and honor employee benefit plans and agreements. Sandler O’Neill also subsequently requested that each remaining participant provide a proposed form of any agreement by which they would acquire TexasBanc.
      On September 9, 2005, TexasBanc received bids from the two interested parties, including Compass. On September 13, 2005, TexasBanc’s board of directors held a special meeting to analyze the two bids received. Mr. Knight gave TexasBanc’s board a summary of the events that had transpired over the past several weeks. Sandler O’Neill then discussed with TexasBanc’s board the two bids and the process that had led to these bids. Jenkens & Gilchrist then discussed the proposed form of agreement provided by Compass. After discussion of the two bids, TexasBanc’s board then agreed that Sandler O’Neill would contact Compass and

28



Table of Contents

discuss the terms of the agreement provided by Compass. Sandler O’Neill was authorized to tell Compass that if TexasBanc believed that a satisfactory agreement could be reached, TexasBanc would enter into a period of exclusivity with Compass.
      During the week of September 12, 2005, outside counsel for TexasBanc and for Compass finalized the agreement and plan of merger based on comments received from their respective clients. Compass representatives spent an additional day conducting confirmatory due diligence with TexasBanc’s outside public accounting firm, and on September 15, 2005, representatives of Sandler O’Neill and Jenkens & Gilchrist conducted reverse due diligence of Compass.
      TexasBanc’s management circulated to TexasBanc’s board of directors a draft definitive agreement and plan of merger on September 17, 2005, and scheduled a special meeting of TexasBanc’s board of directors later that day to review and consider the proposed transaction. At that meeting, Sandler O’Neill made a presentation concerning the merger consideration to TexasBanc’s board. At the conclusion of this discussion and after responding to questions from the directors, Sandler O’Neill rendered to TexasBanc’s board its oral opinion that, subject to the assumptions, limitations and qualifications set forth in their written opinion, that the total aggregate consideration to be received from Compass, which consisted of no more than $231.75 million in cash and 4.938 million shares of Compass common stock, including a cashless exercise of all outstanding TexasBanc options, was fair to holders of TexasBanc common stock from a financial point of view. Sandler O’Neill’s oral opinion was subsequently confirmed by delivery of its written opinion, dated as of September 17, 2005, to TexasBanc’s board of directors. Thereafter, legal counsel reviewed the terms and conditions of the proposed agreement and plan of merger and ancillary legal documents with TexasBanc’s board of directors, discussing in detail the business points, contingencies, timing issues and fiduciary concerns. Outside legal counsel also described the terms and conditions of the shareholder voting agreement that Compass asked to be signed by Mr. Knight and Mrs. Dorothy Doss, a director of TexasBanc, in their personal and representative capacities for certain entities that own a majority of TexasBanc stock. After asking a number of questions of Sandler O’Neill and outside counsel regarding the proposed transaction and discussing the transaction among TexasBanc’s board of directors, the board of directors unanimously adopted resolutions which, among other things, approved the proposed definitive agreement and plan of merger with Compass and the shareholder voting agreement, authorized Mr. Knight or Mr. Bryant to execute the agreement and plan of merger on behalf of TexasBanc, authorized TexasBanc to prepare and file all necessary regulatory applications and called a meeting of TexasBanc’s shareholders to consider and vote on the agreement.
      That evening, signature pages to the agreement and plan of merger, the shareholder voting agreement and related documents were exchanged by the parties. The companies issued a joint press release announcing the signing of the agreement and plan of merger, before the opening of the stock markets on the morning of September 19, 2005.
 
Recommendation of TexasBanc’s Board and Its Reasons for the Merger
      TexasBanc’s board of directors has unanimously approved the agreement and plan of merger and unanimously recommends that TexasBanc shareholders vote “FOR” approval of the agreement and plan of merger.
      TexasBanc’s board of directors has determined that the merger is fair to, and in the best interests of, TexasBanc’s shareholders. In approving the agreement and plan of merger, TexasBanc’s board consulted with Sandler O’Neill with respect to the financial aspects and fairness of the merger consideration, from a financial point of view, to the holders of TexasBanc common stock and with its outside legal counsel as to its legal duties and the terms of the agreement and plan of merger. In arriving at its determination, TexasBanc’s board also considered a number of factors, including the following:
  •  TexasBanc’s board of directors’ familiarity with and review of information concerning the business, results of operations, financial condition, competitive position and future prospects of TexasBanc;
 
  •  the current and prospective environment in which TexasBanc operates, including national, regional and local economic conditions, the competitive environment for banks, thrifts and other financial institu-

29



Table of Contents

  tions generally and the increased regulatory burdens on financial institutions generally and the trend toward consolidation in the banking industry and in the financial services industry;
 
  •  the financial presentation of Sandler O’Neill and the opinion of Sandler O’Neill dated as of September 17, 2005, that, as of September 17, 2005 (the date on which TexasBanc’s board of directors approved the agreement and plan of merger), and subject to the assumptions, limitations and qualifications set forth in the opinion, the total aggregate consideration to be received from Compass, which consisted of no more than $231.75 million in cash and 4.938 million shares of Compass common stock, including a cashless exercise of all outstanding TexasBanc options, is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of TexasBanc common stock (see “— Opinion of TexasBanc’s Financial Adviser,” beginning on page 31);
 
  •  that shareholders of TexasBanc will receive part of the merger consideration in shares of Compass common stock, which is publicly traded on the NASDAQ, contrasted to the absence of a public market for TexasBanc common stock;
 
  •  the treatment of the merger as a tax-free exchange for federal income tax purposes with respect to the TexasBanc common shares exchanged for Compass common shares;
 
  •  the results that could be expected to be obtained by TexasBanc if it continued to operate independently, and the likely benefits to shareholders of such course, as compared with the value of the merger consideration being offered by Compass;
 
  •  the ability of Compass to pay the aggregate merger consideration without a financing contingency and without the need to obtain financing to close the transaction;
 
  •  the ability of Compass to receive the requisite regulatory approvals in a timely manner;
 
  •  the process conducted by Sandler O’Neill to identify potential acquirers of TexasBanc and to assist TexasBanc’s board of directors in determining that it was the appropriate time to sell TexasBanc and in obtaining the highest value reasonably available to shareholders of TexasBanc at the time and under the circumstances;
 
  •  that holders of approximately 82% of the shares of TexasBanc common stock had indicated their willingness to sign the shareholder voting agreement, whereby they would agree to vote the shares of TexasBanc common stock beneficially owned by them in favor of the agreement and plan of merger;
 
  •  the terms and conditions of the agreement and plan of merger, including the parties’ respective representations, warranties, covenants and other agreements, the conditions to closing, a provision which permits TexasBanc’s board of directors, in the exercise of its fiduciary duties, under certain conditions, to furnish information to, a third party which has submitted an unsolicited proposal to acquire TexasBanc;
 
  •  merger with a larger holding company would provide the opportunity to realize economies of scale, increase efficiencies of operations, and enhance the development of new products and services;
 
  •  the effects of the merger on TexasBanc’s employees;
 
  •  the agreement of Compass to use its commercially reasonable efforts to maintain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, to continue to provide indemnification for TexasBanc’s directors and officers, and to honor existing employee benefits;
 
  •  that some of TexasBanc’s directors and executive officers have other financial interests in the merger that are in addition to their interests as TexasBanc shareholders, including as a result of employment and compensation arrangements with TexasBanc and the manner in which they would be affected by the merger, as well as the new employment agreements that certain of these persons entered into with Compass in connection with the merger;
 
  •  that the cash portion of the merger consideration will be taxable to TexasBanc’s shareholders upon completion of the merger;

30



Table of Contents

  •  the requirement that TexasBanc conduct its business in the ordinary course and the other restrictions on the conduct of the TexasBanc’s business before completion of the merger, which may delay or prevent TexasBanc from undertaking business opportunities that may arise pending completion of the merger;
 
  •  that the agreement and plan of merger would prohibit TexasBanc from paying dividends on the TexasBanc common stock between the date of the agreement and plan of merger and completion of the merger; and
 
  •  that under the agreement and plan of merger TexasBanc could not solicit competing proposals for the acquisition of TexasBanc.
      The reasons set out above for the merger are not intended to be exhaustive but include all material factors considered by TexasBanc’s board of directors in approving the merger. In reaching its determination, the TexasBanc board of directors did not assign any relative or specific weights to different factors, and individual directors may have given different weights to different factors. Based on the reasons stated, the board felt that the merger was in the best interest of TexasBanc’s shareholders, and therefore the board of directors of TexasBanc unanimously approved the merger. In addition, certain members of the TexasBanc board of directors have agreed to vote the stock of TexasBanc over which they have voting authority in favor of the agreement and plan of merger and the merger.
 
Opinion of TexasBanc’s Financial Advisor
      By letter agreement dated July 27, 2005, TexasBanc engaged Sandler O’Neill to provide financial advisory services to the TexasBanc board of directors in connection with the consideration of a possible business combination involving TexasBanc and a third party. Sandler O’Neill is a nationally recognized investment banking firm whose principal business specialty is financial institutions. In the ordinary course of its investment banking business, Sandler O’Neill is regularly engaged in the valuation of financial institutions and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions and other corporate transactions.
      Sandler O’Neill acted as financial advisor to TexasBanc in connection with the proposed merger and participated in certain of the negotiations leading to the agreement and plan of merger. At the September 17, 2005 meeting at which the TexasBanc board considered and approved the agreement and plan of merger, Sandler O’Neill delivered to the board its oral opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing that, as of such date, the merger consideration was fair to TexasBanc shareholders from a financial point of view. The full text of Sandler O’Neill’s opinion is attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement/ prospectus. The opinion outlines the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Sandler O’Neill in rendering its opinion. The description of the opinion set forth below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the opinion. We urge TexasBanc shareholders to read the entire opinion carefully in connection with their consideration of the proposed merger.
      Sandler O’Neill’s opinion speaks only as of the date of the opinion. The opinion was directed to the TexasBanc board and is directed only to the fairness of the merger consideration to TexasBanc’s shareholders from a financial point of view. It does not address the underlying business decision of TexasBanc to engage in the merger or any other aspect of the merger and is not a recommendation to any TexasBanc shareholder as to how the shareholder should vote at the special meeting with respect to the merger or any other matter or the form of consideration the shareholder should elect in the merger.
      In connection with rendering its opinion, Sandler O’Neill reviewed and considered, among other things:
        (1) the agreement and plan of merger;
 
        (2) certain financial statements and other historical financial information of TexasBanc that Sandler O’Neill deemed relevant and was provided by the management of TexasBanc;
 
        (3) certain publicly available financial statements and other historical financial information of Compass that Sandler O’Neill deemed relevant;

31



Table of Contents

        (4) internal financial projections for TexasBanc for the years ending December 31, 2005 and 2006 and reviewed with senior management of TexasBanc;
 
        (5) consensus earnings per share estimates for Compass for the years ending December 31, 2005 and 2006 published by I/B/E/S and reviewed with the senior management of Compass;
 
        (6) the pro forma financial impact of the merger on Compass, based on assumptions relating to transaction expenses, purchase accounting adjustments and cost savings determined by the senior management of Compass and TexasBanc;
 
        (7) the publicly reported historical price and trading activity for the Compass common stock, including a comparison of certain financial and stock market information for Compass with similar publicly available information for certain other publicly traded companies that Sandler O’Neill deemed relevant;
 
        (8) the financial terms of certain recent business combinations in the commercial banking industry, to the extent publicly available;
 
        (9) the relative pro forma ownership of the shareholders of TexasBanc and Compass in the combined company;
 
        (10) the current market environment generally and the banking environment in particular; and
 
        (11) such other information, financial studies, analyses and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria as Sandler O’Neill considered relevant.
      Sandler O’Neill also discussed with certain members of TexasBanc’s senior management their views of the business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects of TexasBanc, Sandler O’Neill discussed similar matters with certain members of senior management of Compass regarding the business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects of Compass.
      In performing its reviews and analyses and in rendering its opinion, Sandler O’Neill assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all the financial information and other information that was available from public sources, that was provided to it by TexasBanc or Compass or their respective representatives or that was otherwise reviewed by it, and further relied on the assurances of senior management of TexasBanc and Compass that they were not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make such information inaccurate or misleading. Sandler O’Neill was not asked to and did not independently verify any such information and it did not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy or completeness thereof. Sandler O’Neill did not make an independent evaluation or appraisal of the specific assets, the collateral securing assets or the liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of TexasBanc or Compass or any of their respective subsidiaries, or the ability to collect on any such assets, nor was it furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals. Sandler O’Neill is not an expert in the evaluation of allowances for loan losses, and it did not make an independent evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses of TexasBanc or Compass, nor did it review any individual credit files relating to TexasBanc or Compass. With TexasBanc’s consent, Sandler O’Neill assumed that the respective allowances for loan losses for both TexasBanc and Compass were adequate to cover such losses and will be adequate on a pro forma basis for the combined entity. Sandler O’Neill also assumed that there has been no material change in the assets, financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects of TexasBanc or Compass since the date of the most recent financial statements made available. In addition, Sandler O’Neill did not conduct any physical inspection of the properties or facilities of TexasBanc or Compass.
      Sandler O’Neill assumed, in all respects material to its analysis, that TexasBanc and Compass will remain as going concerns for all periods relevant to its analyses, that all of the representations and warranties contained in the agreement and plan of merger and all related agreements were true and correct, that each party to such agreements will perform all of the covenants required to be performed by it under such agreements, that the conditions precedent in such agreements are not waived and that the merger will qualify as a tax-free reorganization for federal income tax purposes with respect to the Compass common stock to be issued in the merger. With TexasBanc’s consent, Sandler O’Neill relied upon the advice TexasBanc received

32



Table of Contents

from its legal, accounting and tax advisors as to all legal, accounting and tax matters relating to the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the agreement and plan of merger.
      Sandler O’Neill’s opinion was necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other conditions as they existed on, and could be evaluated as of, the date of its opinion. Events occurring after the date of the opinion could materially affect the opinion. Sandler O’Neill has not undertaken to update, revise, reaffirm or withdraw its opinion or otherwise comment upon events occurring after the date thereof. Sandler O’Neill expressed no opinion as to the value of the Compass common stock when issued to TexasBanc’s shareholders or the prices at which the Compass common stock may trade at any time.
      In rendering its opinion, Sandler O’Neill performed a variety of financial analyses. The following is a summary of the material analyses performed by Sandler O’Neill, but is not a complete description of all the analyses underlying Sandler O’Neill’s opinion. The summary includes information presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand the financial analyses, these tables must be read together with the accompanying text. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process involving subjective judgments as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances. The process, therefore, is not necessarily susceptible to a partial analysis or summary description. Sandler O’Neill believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of the factors and analyses considered without considering all factors and analyses, or attempting to ascribe relative weights to some or all such factors and analyses, could create an incomplete view of the evaluation process underlying its opinion. Also, no company included in Sandler O’Neill’s comparative analyses described below is identical to TexasBanc or Compass and no transaction is identical to the merger. Accordingly, an analysis of comparable companies or transactions involves complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of the companies and other factors that could affect the public trading values or merger transaction values, as the case may be, of TexasBanc or Compass and the companies to which they are being compared.
      The earnings projections used and relied upon by Sandler O’Neill for TexasBanc in its analyses were based upon internal financial projections for TexasBanc prepared by and reviewed with the management of TexasBanc. The earnings projections for Compass were those published by I/B/E/S and were reviewed with the Compass management team. With respect to TexasBanc’s financial projections and all projections of transaction costs, purchase accounting adjustments and expected cost savings relating to the merger, management of the respective institutions confirmed to Sandler O’Neill that they reflected the best currently available estimates and judgments of management and Sandler O’Neill assumed for purposes of its analyses that such performances would be achieved. Sandler O’Neill expressed no opinion as to such financial projections or the assumptions on which they were based. The financial projections and estimates provided by management of TexasBanc were prepared for internal purposes only and not with a view towards public disclosure. These projections, as well as the other estimates used by Sandler O’Neill in its analyses, were based on numerous variables and assumptions that are inherently uncertain, and, accordingly, actual results could vary materially from those set forth in such projections.
      In performing its analyses, Sandler O’Neill also made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, business and economic conditions and various other matters, many of which cannot be predicted and are beyond the control of TexasBanc, Compass and Sandler O’Neill. The analyses performed by Sandler O’Neill are not necessarily indicative of actual values or future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by such analyses. Sandler O’Neill prepared its analyses solely for purposes of rendering its opinion and provided such analyses to the TexasBanc board at the board’s September 17, 2005 meeting. Estimates on the values of companies do not purport to be appraisals or necessarily reflect the prices at which companies or their securities may actually be sold. Such estimates are inherently subject to uncertainty and actual values may be materially different. Accordingly, Sandler O’Neill’s analyses do not necessarily reflect the value of the Compass common stock or the price at which the Compass common stock may be sold at any time.

33



Table of Contents

      Summary of Proposal. Sandler O’Neill reviewed the financial terms of the proposed transaction. Based upon the total consideration equal to $231.75 million in cash and 4.938 million shares of Compass common stock and upon 182,696 shares of TexasBanc common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2005 and 3,600 options outstanding with a weighted average strike price of $651.61 per option and the 10-day average for the closing stock price of Compass common stock of $46.93 on that date, Sandler O’Neill calculated a per share transaction value of $2,505.94 (excluding merger expenses and capitalized transaction costs).
      Based upon TexasBanc’s financial information as of and for the period ending June 30, 2005, Sandler O’Neill calculated the following ratios:
                         
    Transaction Ratios
     
    Compass/   Texas   Nationwide
    TexasBanc   Transactions(1)   Transactions(2)
             
Transaction price/ LTM EPS
    23.5 x     28.8 x     22.6 x
Transaction price/ Book value(3)
    366.1 %     314.9 %     223.5 %
Transaction price/ Tangible book value(3)
    384.0 %     323.4 %     311.3 %
Tangible book premium/ Core deposits(4)
    30.2 %     22.3 %     23.8 %
 
(1)  Represents the median transaction ratios for Texas commercial bank transactions greater than $25 million since January 1, 2004.
 
(2)  Represents the median transaction ratios for nationwide commercial bank transactions greater than $300 million and less than $600 million since January 1, 2004.
 
(3)  Reflects TexasBanc stated book value and tangible book value of $684.45 and $652.55 per share, respectively.
 
(4)  Core deposits defined as total deposits less jumbo and brokered certificates of deposit.
      Stock Trading History. Sandler O’Neill reviewed the reported closing per share market prices and volume of the Compass common stock for the one-year and three-year periods ended September 16, 2005 and the relationship between the movements in the closing prices of the Compass common stock during those periods to movements in certain stock indices, including the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, Standard & Poor’s Bank Index, and the NASDAQ Bank Index, and to the weighted average (by market capitalization) performance of a peer group of publicly-traded commercial banks selected by Sandler O’Neill. The institutions included in the peer group are identified in the section “Comparable Company Analysis” below.
      During the one-year period ended September 16, 2005, the Compass common stock outperformed the Standard & Poor’s Bank Index, the NASDAQ Bank Index, and the peer group to which it was compared while it generally underperformed the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. Over the three-year period ended September 16, 2005, the Compass common stock generally outperformed the indices and peer group to which it was compared.
Compass Stock Performance
                 
    Beginning Index Value   Ending Index Value
    September 15, 2004   September 16, 2005
         
Compass
    100.0       104.0  
Compass Peer Group
    100.0       102.7  
NASDAQ Bank Index
    100.0       102.1  
S&P Bank Index
    100.0       98.7  
S&P 500 Index
    100.0       109.6  

34



Table of Contents

                 
    Beginning Index Value   Ending Index Value
    September 13, 2002   September 16, 2005
         
Compass
    100.0       145.9  
Compass Peer Group
    100.0       126.6  
NASDAQ Bank Index
    100.0       133.7  
S&P Bank Index
    100.0       126.2  
S&P 500 Index
    100.0       138.0  
      Sandler O’Neill also noted that the total reported trading volume for Compass over the one-year and three-year periods ended September 16, 2005 was 125.5 million and 364.4 million shares.
      Comparable Company Analysis. Sandler O’Neill used publicly available information to compare selected financial and market trading information for Compass and a group of commercial banks selected by Sandler O’Neill. This peer group consisted of the following publicly traded commercial banks:
     
AmSouth Bancorp
  Mercantile Bankshares Corp.
City National Corp.
  Regions Financial Corp.
Colonial BancGroup, Inc.
  South Financial Group Inc.
Commerce Bancorp Inc.
  Zions Bancorp.
First Horizon National Corp.
   
      Sandler O’Neill used publicly available information to compare selected financial and market trading information for Compass and the median data for the commercial banks in the Peer Group as of and for the twelve months ending June 30, 2005. The table below sets forth the comparative data as of and for the twelve months ending June 30, 2005, with pricing data as of September 16, 2005:
Comparable Group Analysis
                 
        Peer Group
    Compass   Median
         
Total assets (in millions)
  $ 29,502.9     $ 32,875.3  
Tangible equity/ Tangible assets
    6.3 %     6.6 %
LTM Return on average assets
    1.38 %     1.33 %
LTM Return on average equity
    19.17 %     15.67 %
Price/ Tangible book value
    321.8 %     282.4 %
Price/ LTM earnings per share
    15.1 x     16.4 x
Price/ Estimated 2005 earnings per share
    14.5 x(1)     14.5 x(1)
Market Capitalization (in millions)
  $ 5,863.7     $ 4,844.3  
 
(1)  I/B/E/S median
      Analysis of Selected Merger Transactions. Sandler O’Neill reviewed 13 merger transactions announced from January 1, 2004 through September 16, 2005 involving commercial banks acquired in Texas (the “Regional Group”) with announced transaction values greater than $25 million. Sandler O’Neill also reviewed 8 merger transactions announced in the United States (the “Nationwide Group”) from January 1, 2004 through September 16, 2005 involving commercial banks with announced transaction values greater than $300 million and less than $600 million. Sandler O’Neill reviewed the following multiples: transaction price at announcement to last twelve months’ net income, transaction price to stated book value, transaction price to tangible book value, and tangible book premium to core deposits. Sandler O’Neill computed a high, low, mean, and median multiple and premium for the transactions. The median multiples from the Regional Group and the median multiples for the Nationwide Group were applied to TexasBanc’s financial information as of and for the twelve months ended June 30, 2005. As illustrated in the following table, Sandler O’Neill derived imputed ranges of values for TexasBanc of $562.1 million to $373.6 million based upon the median multiples

35



Table of Contents

for the commercial bank transactions in the Regional Group and $440.5 million to $279.5 million based upon the median multiples for commercial bank transactions in the Nationwide Group.
Comparable Transaction Multiples
                                 
            Median    
    Median       Nationwide    
    Regional Group   Implied   Group   Implied
    Multiple   Value   Multiple   Value
                 
        ($mm)       ($mm)
Transaction price/ LTM net income
    28.9 x   $ 562.1       22.6 x   $ 440.5  
Transaction price/ Book value
    314.9 %   $ 393.8       223.5 %   $ 279.5  
Transaction price/ Tangible book value
    323.4 %   $ 385.5       311.3 %   $ 371.2  
Tangible book premium/ Core deposits(1)
    22.3 %   $ 373.6 (2)     23.8 %   $ 390.6 (2)
 
(1)  Assumes 16.22% of total deposits are non-core deposits
 
(2)  Assumes TexasBanc’s total core deposits are $1,138.7 million. Tangible book premium/core deposits calculated by dividing the excess of the aggregate transaction value of $463.5 million over tangible book value by core deposits
      Discounted Dividend Stream and Terminal Value Analysis of TexasBanc. Sandler O’Neill performed an analysis that estimated the future stream of after-tax dividend flows of TexasBanc through December 31, 2008 under various circumstances, assuming TexasBanc’s projected dividend stream and assuming that TexasBanc performed in accordance with the earnings projections reviewed with TexasBanc’s management through 2006. For periods after 2006, Sandler O’Neill assumed an annual earnings per share growth rate of approximately 10%. To approximate the terminal value of TexasBanc common stock at December 31, 2008, Sandler O’Neill applied a 14.0x to 24.0x price/ LTM earnings multiple range. The dividend income streams and terminal values were then discounted to present values using different discount rates ranging from 9% to 14% chosen to reflect different assumptions regarding required rates of return of holders TexasBanc common stock. As illustrated in the following tables, this analysis indicated an imputed range of values per share of TexasBanc common stock of $1,500 to $2,976 when applying the price/ LTM earnings multiples. Sandler O’Neill also considered and discussed with the TexasBanc board how the present value analyses would be affected by changes in the underlying assumptions, including variations with respect to net income, dividend payout ratios, and share repurchases.
Earnings Per Share Multiples
                                                 
Discount Rate   14.0x   16.0x   18.0x   20.0x   22.0x   24.0x
                         
 9.00%
  $ 1,736     $ 1,984     $ 2,232     $ 2,480     $ 2,728     $ 2,976  
10.00%
  $ 1,685     $ 1,926     $ 2,166     $ 2,407     $ 2,648     $ 2,889  
10.25%
  $ 1,673     $ 1,912     $ 2,150     $ 2,389     $ 2,628     $ 2,867  
11.00%
  $ 1,636     $ 1,870     $ 2,104     $ 2,337     $ 2,571     $ 2,805  
12.00%
  $ 1,589     $ 1,816     $ 2,043     $ 2,270     $ 2,497     $ 2,724  
13.00%
  $ 1,544     $ 1,764     $ 1,985     $ 2,206     $ 2,426     $ 2,647  
14.00%
  $ 1,500     $ 1,715     $ 1,929     $ 2,143     $ 2,358     $ 2,572  
      Discounted Dividend Stream and Terminal Value Analysis of Compass. Sandler O’Neill performed an analysis that estimated the future stream of after-tax dividend flows of Compass through December 31, 2008 under various circumstances, assuming the projected dividend stream of Compass and that Compass performed in accordance with the earnings projections reviewed with Compass management through 2006. For periods after 2006, Sandler O’Neill assumed an annual earnings per share growth rate of approximately 10%. To approximate the terminal value of Compass common stock at December 31, 2008, Sandler O’Neill applied a 9.0x to 19.0x price/ LTM earnings multiple range. The dividend income streams and terminal values were then discounted to present values using different discount rates ranging from 9% to 14% chosen to reflect

36



Table of Contents

different assumptions regarding required rates of return of holders or prospective buyers of Compass common stock. As illustrated in the following tables, this analysis indicated an imputed range of values per share of Compass common stock of $32.18 to $69.25 when applying the price/ LTM earnings multiples. Sandler O’Neill also considered and discussed with the TexasBanc board how the present value analyses would be affected by changes in the underlying assumptions, including variations with respect to net income, dividend payout ratios and share repurchases. The 10-day average closing price of Compass common stock on September 16, 2004 was $46.93 per share.
Earnings Per Share Multiples
                                                 
Discount Rate   9.0x   11.0x   13.0x   15.0x   17.0x   19.0x
                         
 9.00%
  $ 36.71     $ 43.21     $ 49.72     $ 56.23     $ 62.74     $ 69.25  
10.00%
  $ 35.73     $ 42.05     $ 48.37     $ 54.68     $ 61.00     $ 67.32  
10.25%
  $ 35.49     $ 41.77     $ 48.04     $ 54.31     $ 60.58     $ 66.85  
11.00%
  $ 34.79     $ 40.93     $ 47.06     $ 53.20     $ 59.33     $ 65.47  
12.00%
  $ 33.89     $ 39.85     $ 45.81     $ 51.76     $ 57.72     $ 63.68  
13.00%
  $ 33.02     $ 38.81     $ 44.60     $ 50.38     $ 56.17     $ 61.96  
14.00%
  $ 32.18     $ 37.80     $ 43.43     $ 49.05     $ 54.68     $ 60.31  
Sandler O’Neill noted that the discounted dividend stream and terminal value analysis is a widely used valuation methodology, but the results of such methodology are highly dependent upon the numerous assumptions that must be made, and the results thereof are not necessarily indicative of actual values or future results.
      Pro Forma Merger Analysis. Sandler O’Neill analyzed certain potential pro forma effects of the merger, assuming the following: (1) the merger closes on December 31, 2005; (2) $231.75 million in cash and 4,938,206 shares of Compass common stock are issued in the merger; (3) earnings per share projections for TexasBanc are consistent with internal projections as discussed with management of TexasBanc and, with respect to Compass, earnings share projections are consistent with those published by I/B/E/S and reviewed with Compass’ management, and (4) purchase accounting adjustments, charges and transaction costs associated with the merger and cost savings determined by the senior management of Compass. The analysis indicated that for the year ending December 31, 2006, the merger would be slightly dilutive to the projected earnings per share of Compass and that at, December 31, 2005, the assumed closing date for the merger, dilutive to the tangible book value per share of Compass. Additionally, Sandler O’Neill noted that TexasBanc shareholders would own 3.7% of the combined company at closing.
      TexasBanc has agreed to pay Sandler O’Neill a transaction fee in connection with the merger of approximately $4.64 million (based on the closing price of Compass stock on September 17, 2005), 25% of which was payable upon signing of the definitive agreement and the balance of which is contingent and payable upon completion of the merger. TexasBanc has also agreed to pay Sandler O’Neill fees of $150,000 for rendering its opinion, which will be credited against the portion of the transaction fee payable upon completion of the merger. TexasBanc has also agreed to reimburse certain of Sandler O’Neill’s reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with its engagement and to indemnify Sandler O’Neill and its affiliates and their respective partners, directors, officers, employees, agents, and controlling persons against certain expenses and liabilities, including liabilities under securities laws.
      Sandler O’Neill has in the past provided certain other investment banking services to TexasBanc and has received compensation for such services. Sandler O’Neill also has provided certain investment banking services to Compass in the past and has received compensation for such services and may provide, and receive compensation for, such services in the future, including during the period before the closing of the merger. In the ordinary course of its business as a broker-dealer, Sandler O’Neill may purchase securities from and sell securities to TexasBanc and Compass and their respective affiliates and may actively trade the debt or equity securities of TexasBanc and Compass and their respective affiliates for its own account and for the accounts of customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.

37



Table of Contents

 
Accounting Treatment
      Compass will account for the merger as a purchase. Compass will make a determination of the fair value of TexasBanc’s assets and assumed liabilities in order to allocate the purchase price of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. To the extent that the total purchase price exceeds the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, Compass may record goodwill. After the merger, Compass will include the results of TexasBanc’s operations in its consolidated results of operations.
 
Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
      The following is a summary of the material anticipated United States federal income tax consequences of the merger to a U.S. holder of TexasBanc common stock that surrenders shares of TexasBanc common stock for shares of Compass common stock or cash in the merger. This summary does not address any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, local or foreign jurisdiction. The summary is based on the Code, United States Treasury regulations, administrative rulings and court decisions in effect as of the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus, all of which are subject to change or differing interpretations (possibly with retroactive effect), and any such change or differing interpretation could affect the continuing validity of this discussion.
      For purposes of this summary, the term “U.S. holder” means, a beneficial owner of TexasBanc common stock that is, for United States federal income tax purposes:
  •  a citizen or resident of the United States;
 
  •  a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes, created or organized under the laws of the United States or of any state or the District of Columbia;
 
  •  a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (2) was in existence on August 20, 1996 and has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury regulations to continue to be treated as a United States person; or
 
  •  an estate that is subject to United States federal income tax on its income regardless of its source.
      If a partnership (including for this purpose any other entity treated as a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes) holds TexasBanc common stock, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of the partners and the activities of the partnership. If a U.S. holder is a partner in a partnership holding TexasBanc common stock, such holder should consult its tax advisor.
      This discussion only addresses TexasBanc’s shareholders that hold their shares of TexasBanc common stock as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code. Further, this summary does not address all aspects of United States federal income taxation that may be relevant to a TexasBanc shareholder in light of such holder’s particular circumstances or that may be applicable to holders subject to special treatment under United States federal income tax laws (including, for example, tax-exempt organizations, mutual funds, a trader in securities who elects to apply a mark to market method of accounting, dealers in securities or foreign currencies, banks, insurance companies, financial institutions or persons that hold their TexasBanc common stock as part of a hedge, straddle, constructive sale or conversion transaction, an S corporation, partnership or other pass through entity (or an investor in an S corporation, partnership of other pass through entity), holders subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the Code, holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, holders that exercise appraisal rights, or holders who acquired their TexasBanc common stock through the exercise of an employee stock option, through a tax qualified retirement plan or otherwise as compensation). In addition, no information is provided in this proxy statement/ prospectus with respect to the tax consequences of the merger under applicable state, local or non-United States laws or United States tax laws other than United States federal income tax laws. No ruling has been requested from the IRS regarding the United States federal income tax consequences of the merger. No assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of the tax consequences set forth below.
      HOLDERS ARE URGED TO CONSULT WITH THEIR TAX ADVISORS REGARDING THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER TO THEM, INCLUDING THE EFFECTS OF

38



Table of Contents

UNITED STATES FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL, FOREIGN AND OTHER TAX LAWS AND OF CHANGES IN THOSE LAWS.
      The merger is intended to qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code for United States federal income tax purposes. It is a condition to each party’s obligation to consummate the merger that it receive an opinion from its tax counsel, dated as of the closing date of the merger, to the effect that the merger will be treated as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.
      These opinions will be based on representation letters provided by TexasBanc and Compass and on customary factual assumptions. If any of the representations or assumptions upon which the opinions are based are inconsistent with the actual facts, the tax consequences of the merger could be adversely affected. The determination by tax counsel as to whether the proposed merger will be treated as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code will depend upon the facts and law existing at the effective time of the proposed merger. The opinions are not binding on the IRS or any court and do not preclude the IRS from asserting, or a court from sustaining, a contrary conclusion.
      Assuming the merger qualifies as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, TexasBanc and Compass will not recognize any gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes as a result of the merger. Assuming the merger is treated as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, the material United States federal income tax consequences of the merger to U.S. holders of TexasBanc common stock are, in general, as follows:
Exchange of TexasBanc Common Stock Solely for Compass Common Stock.
      A TexasBanc shareholder that exchanges all of its shares of TexasBanc common stock solely for Compass common stock in the merger will not recognize any gain or loss (except with respect to cash received instead of fractional shares of Compass common stock, as discussed below). The aggregate tax basis of the shares of Compass common stock received in the merger (including any fractional shares deemed received and exchanged for cash as described below) will be equal to the aggregate tax basis in the shares of TexasBanc common stock surrendered in exchange for the Compass common stock, and an exchanging TexasBanc shareholder’s holding period in the Compass common stock received in the merger (including any fractional shares deemed received and exchanged for cash as described below) will include the holding period of the shares of TexasBanc common stock surrendered in exchange for the Compass common stock.
Exchange of TexasBanc Common Stock Solely for Cash.
      A TexasBanc shareholder that exchanges all of its shares of TexasBanc common stock solely for cash in the merger will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount of cash received and the holder’s tax basis in the TexasBanc common stock surrendered. The capital gain or loss recognized will be long-term capital gain or loss if, as of the effective date of the merger, the holder’s holding period for the TexasBanc common stock surrendered exceeds one year. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. In some cases, if a holder actually or constructively owns Compass common stock after the merger, the cash received could be treated as having the effect of the distribution of a dividend under the tests set forth in Section 302 of the Code (as described below), in which case such holder may have dividend income up to the amount of the cash received. In such cases, holders that are corporations should consult their tax advisors regarding the potential applicability of the “extraordinary dividend” provisions of the Code.
Exchange of TexasBanc Common Stock for Compass Common Stock and Cash.
      A TexasBanc shareholder that receives a combination of Compass common stock and cash in exchange for all of its shares of TexasBanc common stock will recognize gain (but not loss) in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the sum of the amount of cash and the fair market value of the Compass common stock received in the merger minus the shareholder’s aggregate tax basis in its TexasBanc common stock surrendered and (ii) the amount of cash the shareholder receives in the merger (other than cash received instead of fractional shares of Compass common stock).

39



Table of Contents

      A TexasBanc shareholder’s aggregate tax basis in the Compass common stock received in the merger (including any fractional shares deemed received and exchanged for cash as described below) will be equal to the shareholder’s aggregate tax basis in its TexasBanc common stock surrendered, decreased by the amount of any cash received (other than cash received instead of fractional shares of Compass common stock) and increased by the amount of any gain recognized (other than gain recognized with respect to cash received instead of fractional shares of Compass common stock). A TexasBanc shareholder’s holding period for Compass common stock received in the merger (including any fractional shares deemed received and exchanged for cash) will include the holding period of the TexasBanc common stock surrendered in the merger.
Possible Treatment of Cash as a Dividend.
      Any gain recognized in the exchange will be capital gain unless the TexasBanc shareholder’s receipt of cash has the effect of a distribution of a dividend, in which case the gain will be treated as dividends to the extent of the holder’s ratable share of accumulated earnings and profits, as calculated for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For purposes of determining whether an TexasBanc shareholder’s receipt of cash has the effect of a distribution of a dividend, the TexasBanc shareholder will be treated as if it first exchanged all of its TexasBanc common stock solely in exchange for Compass common stock and then Compass immediately redeemed a portion of that stock for the cash that the holder actually received in the merger. Receipt of cash will generally not have the effect of a distribution of a dividend of the TexasBanc shareholder if such receipt is, with respect to the TexasBanc shareholder, “not essentially equivalent to a dividend” or “substantially disproportionate,” each within the meaning of Section 302(b) of the Code. The IRS has indicated in rulings that any reduction in the interest of a minority shareholder that owns a small number of shares in a publicly and widely held corporation and that exercises no control over corporate affairs would result in capital gain (as opposed to dividend) treatment. In determining the interest of a shareholder in a corporation, certain constructive ownership rules must be taken into account. Any capital gain will be long-term if the TexasBanc shareholder’s holding period for its TexasBanc common stock is more than one year as of the date of the exchange.
Cash in Lieu of Fractional Shares.
      A holder of TexasBanc common stock who receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of Compass common stock generally will be treated as having received such fractional share in the merger and then as having received cash in exchange for such fractional share. As a result, assuming that the redemption of a fractional share of TexasBanc common stock is treated as a sale or exchange and not as a dividend, gain or loss generally will be recognized based on the difference between the amount of cash received in lieu of the fractional share and the tax basis allocated to such fractional share of Compass common stock and such gain or loss generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if, as of the effective date of the merger, the holding period for such share is greater than one year.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting.
      In general, a non-corporate TexasBanc shareholder receiving cash in the merger may be subject to information reporting to the IRS. In addition, backup withholding at the applicable rate (currently 28%) may apply to cash payments received unless the exchanging TexasBanc shareholder either provides an accurate taxpayer identification number and certifies that it is not subject to backup withholding (generally on a substitute IRS Form W-9) or otherwise establishes an exemption to the satisfaction of Compass and the exchange agent. Any amount withheld as backup withholding from payments to an exchanging TexasBanc shareholder will be allowed by the IRS as a refund or credit against the TexasBanc shareholder’s federal income tax liability if the shareholder timely furnishes the required information to the IRS. TexasBanc shareholders should consult their tax advisors as to their qualifications for exemption from backup withholding and the procedure for establishing an exemption.

40



Table of Contents

Reporting Requirements.
      A TexasBanc shareholder who receives Compass common stock as a result of the merger will generally be required to retain records pertaining to the merger and will be required to file with such shareholder’s United States federal income tax return for the year in which the merger takes place a statement setting forth certain facts relating to the merger.
      The preceding summary does not address tax consequences that may vary with, or are contingent on, individual circumstances. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisers as to the specific tax consequences to them of the merger, including tax return reporting requirements, the applicability and effect of federal, state, local, foreign and other applicable tax laws and the effect of any proposed changes in such tax laws.
 
Governmental and Regulatory Approvals
      Completion of the merger is subject to prior receipt of all required approvals and consents by all applicable federal and state regulatory authorities. Compass and TexasBanc have agreed to cooperate and use all reasonable best efforts to obtain all permits, consents, approvals and authorizations from any governmental or regulatory authority necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated by the agreement and plan of merger as promptly as practicable.
      The approval of the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding Company Act is generally required for the indirect acquisition of a bank under Section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act. Section 3 requires the Federal Reserve, when considering a transaction such as this one, to take into consideration the financial and managerial resources of the companies and the banks concerned, including the competence, experience and integrity of its officers, directors and principal shareholders, the future prospects of the companies and banks concerned, their compliance with laws intended to detect and combat money laundering, and the effect of the transaction on the convenience and needs of the communities to be served. In considering financial resources and future prospects, the Federal Reserve will, among other things, evaluate the adequacy of the capital levels of the parties to a proposed transaction and of the resulting institutions. The Federal Reserve, in turn, is required to provide notice to the Texas Department of Banking, the regulator of TexasBanc’s sole bank subsidiary, TexasBank.
      The Bank Holding Company Act prohibits the Federal Reserve from approving a merger if it would result in a monopoly or be in furtherance of any combination or conspiracy to monopolize or to attempt to monopolize the business of banking in any part of the United States or its effect in any section of the country would be substantially to lessen competition or to tend to create a monopoly, or if it would in any other respect result in a restraint of trade, unless the Federal Reserve finds that the anti-competitive effects of the merger are clearly outweighed by the probable effect of the transaction in meeting the convenience and needs of the communities to be served.
      In addition, under the Community Reinvestment Act, the Federal Reserve must take into account the record of performance of the depository institution subsidiaries of Compass and TexasBanc in meeting the credit needs of the communities served by such institutions, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.
      The merger may not be completed until the 30th day, or, with the consent of the relevant agencies, the 15th day, after the date of Federal Reserve approval, during which period the United States Department of Justice may comment adversely on the merger or challenge the merger on antitrust grounds. The commencement of an antitrust action would stay the effectiveness of the Federal Reserve approval unless a court specifically orders otherwise.
Status of Applications and Notices.
      Compass and TexasBanc have either filed or intend to complete the filing promptly after the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus of all required applications and notices with applicable regulatory authorities in connection with the merger by the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus. There can be no assurance that all

41



Table of Contents

requisite approvals will be obtained, that such approvals will be received on a timely basis or that such approvals will not impose conditions or requirements that, individually or in the aggregate, would or could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial conditions, results of operations or business of TexasBanc or Compass after completion of the merger. If any such condition or requirement is imposed, either Compass or TexasBanc may elect not to consummate the merger. See “The Agreement and Plan of Merger — Conditions to the Completion of the Merger” beginning on page 59.
 
Procedures for Making Elections
      Before the completion of the merger until one year after the effective time of the merger, Compass will make available on a timely basis or cause to made available to an exchange agent agreed upon by Compass and TexasBanc, which we refer to as the “exchange agent”, (1) certificates or, at Compass’ option, evidence of shares in book-entry form, representing the shares of Compass common stock to be issued under the agreement and plan of merger and (2) cash payable as part of the cash portion of the merger consideration and instead of any fractional shares of Compass common stock to be issued under the agreement and plan of merger. Promptly after the effective time of the merger, the exchange agent will exchange certificates representing shares of TexasBanc common stock for the merger consideration. No interest will accrue or be paid with respect to any property to be delivered upon surrender of TexasBanc stock certificates.
      If any Compass stock certificate is to be issued, or cash payment made, in a name other than that in which the TexasBanc stock certificate surrendered in exchange for the merger consideration is registered, the person requesting the exchange must pay any transfer or other taxes required by reason of the issuance of the new Compass certificate or the payment of the cash consideration in a name other than that of the registered holder of the TexasBanc stock certificate surrendered, or must establish to the satisfaction of Compass and the exchange agent that any such taxes have been paid or are not applicable.
Election Form.
      The agreement and plan of merger provides that the cash or stock elections will be made on a form mutually agreed upon by Compass and TexasBanc. The exchange agent will mail or deliver to each holder of record of TexasBanc common stock, at the same time TexasBanc shareholders are mailed this proxy statement/ prospectus, the election form and customary transmittal materials containing instructions for use in effecting the surrender of TexasBanc stock certificates in exchange for the merger consideration. TexasBanc and Compass have agreed to mail the election form and transmittal materials to each holder of record of TexasBanc common stock as of December 30, 2005, the record date.
Election Deadline; Submission of Election Materials.
      To be effective, election forms must be properly completed, signed and actually received by the exchange agent not later than 5:00 p.m., New York time, on February 15, 2006, the day immediately before the special meeting of TexasBanc shareholders.
      An election form will be properly completed only if accompanied by certificates representing all shares of TexasBanc common stock covered by the election form.
      Generally, an election may be revoked, but only by written notice received by the exchange agent before the election deadline. If an election is revoked and any certificates have been transmitted to the exchange agent, the exchange agent will, upon written request, return those certificates to the shareholder who submitted them.
      Shares of TexasBanc common stock as to which the holder has not made a valid election before the election deadline, including as a result of revocation, will be treated as no election shares.
Dividends and Distributions.
      No dividends or other distributions with a record date after the effective time will be paid. When duly surrendered, Compass will pay, without interest, any unpaid dividends or other distributions declared before

42



Table of Contents

the effective time but not paid. After the effective time, there will be no transfers on the stock transfer books of TexasBanc of any shares of TexasBanc common stock. If certificates representing shares of TexasBanc common stock are presented for transfer after the completion of the merger, they will be cancelled and exchanged for the merger consideration into which the shares of TexasBanc common stock represented by that certificate have been converted.
Withholding.
      The exchange agent will be entitled to deduct and withhold from the merger consideration payable to any TexasBanc shareholder the amounts it is required to deduct and withhold under any federal, state, local or foreign tax law. If the exchange agent withholds any amounts, these amounts will be treated for all purposes of the merger as having been paid to the shareholders from whom the amounts were withheld.
No Fractional Shares Will Be Issued.
      Compass will not issue fractional shares of Compass common stock in the merger. There will be no dividends or voting rights with respect to any fractional common shares. For each fractional share of common stock that would otherwise be issued, Compass will pay cash in an amount equal to the fraction of a whole share that would otherwise have been issued, multiplied by the average closing sale prices of one share of Compass common stock for the ten consecutive trading days on the NASDAQ immediately proceeding the completion of the merger. No interest will be paid or accrued on the cash paid for fractional shares.
Lost, Stolen or Destroyed TexasBanc Stock Certificates.
      If you have lost a certificate representing TexasBanc common stock, or it has been stolen or destroyed, Compass will issue to you the common stock or cash payable under the agreement and plan of merger if you submit an affidavit of that fact and post a bond in such reasonable amount as Compass or the exchange agent may direct to protect against any claim that may be made against Compass about ownership of the lost, stolen or destroyed certificate.

43



Table of Contents

 
INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER
      Certain of TexasBanc’s directors and executive officers may have interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition to, their interests as shareholders of TexasBanc. TexasBanc’s board of directors was aware of these interests and took them into account at the time they approved the agreement and plan of merger.
 
Employment Agreements
      As an inducement and condition to Compass’ willingness to enter into the agreement and plan of merger, each of Vernon W. Bryant, Jr. (who serves as President and a director of TexasBanc, and President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of TexasBank), William H. Adams, III (who serves as Fort Worth Regional President of TexasBank), Bruce H. McNeil (who serves as Ridgmar Regional President of TexasBank), Damon S. “Stan” O’Neil (who serves as Northeast Regional President of TexasBank), and Wayne W. “Wade” Wallace (who serves as Parker County and Denton Regional President of TexasBank) entered into employment agreements with Compass Bank, an Alabama banking corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Compass, which become effective at the effective time of the merger and continue in effect for two years thereafter (three years in the case of Mr. Bryant).
      Under the employment agreements, following completion of the merger, each of the executives will serve as a Regional President of a designated geographic area of Compass Bank. The minimum base salary under the respective employment agreements is $345,000 for Mr. Bryant, $190,000 for Mr. Adams, $180,000 for Mr. McNeil, $210,000 for Mr. O’Neil and $200,000 for Mr. Wallace. Each executive’s base salary is subject to annual review and may be increased. Additionally, each executive is entitled to an annual cash bonus based on the achievement of pre-established performance goals, with a target annual bonus of not less than 100% of his annual base salary for Mr. Bryant, 40% of their respective annual base salaries for Messrs. Adams and McNeil, and 50% of their respective annual base salaries for Messrs. O’Neil and Wallace. The executives are guaranteed an annual bonus in 2006 which will not be less than $285,000 for Mr. Bryant, $38,000 for Mr. Adams, $36,000 for Mr. McNeil, $52,500 for Mr. O’Neil and $85,000 for Mr. Wallace.
      Under the employment agreements, each executive also will receive an initial restricted stock award which will vest in full on the third anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the executive’s continued employment with Compass Bank through the vesting date, except that these awards will fully vest if the executive is terminated by Compass Bank without cause (as defined in the employment agreement) or upon the occurrence of a change of control of Compass. The value of each executive’s initial restricted stock award will be equal to his minimum annual base salary. Each executive will also be eligible for an annual stock option grant, at the time and on the terms and conditions as determined by Compass’ Compensation Committee.
      Further, subject to the executive’s continued employment on the date of grant of annual awards in respect to Compass Bank’s 2006 fiscal year, the executive will be granted a stock option to acquire the following number of shares of Compass common stock: Messrs. Bryant and O’Neil — 7,500 shares, Messrs. McNeil and Wallace — 7,000 shares and Mr. Adams — 6,500 shares. These options will vest in full on the third anniversary date of the date of grant, subject to the executive’s continued employment with Compass Bank through the vesting date, except that these awards will fully vest if the executive is terminated by Compass Bank without cause or upon the occurrence of a change of control of Compass.
      The executives will also receive the benefits that are generally made available to employees of equal grade and base salary on the same basis as Compass Bank makes the benefits available to its other employees, including participation in Compass Bancshares, Inc. SmartInvestor Retirement Plan and non-qualified deferred compensation plan. In addition, Compass Bank will pay country club membership fees and monthly dues for each executive as well as provide a $500 monthly automobile allowance.
      Each employment agreement also provides that upon termination of employment by Compass Bank other than for cause or disability or by the executive for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), such executive will receive his annual base salary for the longer of (1) the remainder of the employment period or (2) six months from the termination date. Each executive is also subject to certain non-competition

44



Table of Contents

and non-solicitation covenants while employed and for a specified period thereafter. The employment agreements provide that payments under the agreement will not be made if they could reasonably be expected to be parachute payments under Section 280G of the Code, and as such, TexasBanc is seeking shareholder approval for purposes of Section 280G of these employment agreements. See “Proposal 2 — Approval of 280G Payments” beginning on page 72 of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
 
Treatment of TexasBanc Stock Options
      Certain executive officers have options to purchase shares of TexasBanc common stock. The table under “— Benefits Table” sets forth each of the executive officers who have such options and the number of options each executive officer has been awarded. Under the TexasBanc stock option plan, TexasBanc may, in its discretion, accelerate the vesting of any unvested TexasBanc stock option, thus allowing the option holders (including the executives) to exercise stock options which would otherwise be unvested, as well as previously vested stock options, for shares of TexasBanc common stock. TexasBanc presently intends to accelerate the vesting of any unvested TexasBanc stock options prior to the shareholder meeting such that holders of TexasBanc options will be able to exercise those options and make an election with respect to the shares of TexasBanc common stock that they receive. The merger agreement permits TexasBanc to accelerate the vesting of the TexasBanc stock options 15 days before the closing of the merger, which TexasBanc believes will be prior to the shareholder meeting. If it is reasonably likely that prior to the shareholders meeting it appears that the closing of the merger will not be consummated within 15 days of the shareholder meeting, Compass intends to permit TexasBanc to accelerate the vesting of the unvested TexasBanc stock options on a sooner date such that in all cases the holders of the TexasBanc options will be able to exercise those options prior to the deadline for making an election.
      Under the agreement and plan of merger, before the effective time of the merger, TexasBanc must require that all such stock options that have been granted under the TexasBanc stock option plan (including previously unvested stock options which have had their vesting accelerated as described above) either be exercised or cancelled. An optionee may, to the extent permitted in his or her option award agreement, pay the exercise price of an option by surrendering the appropriate number of shares of TexasBanc common stock owned by the optionee (including shares of TexasBanc acquired upon the exercise of a vested option). Upon exercise of an option, TexasBanc will pay to each optionee a “capital gain gross up payment”. The amount of this capital gain gross up payment is intended to reimburse the optionee for any federal income taxes that the optionee has to pay in excess of the federal long-term capital gains tax rate as a result of exercising an option. The amount of a capital gain gross up payment will be credited first to the optionee’s withholding obligations on the option exercise, then to the exercise price of the acquired shares, and, finally, any remaining amount of the capital gain gross up payment that is left will be paid to the optionee in cash.
      Regardless of the number of shares issued as a result of the exercise of TexasBanc stock options, in no event will Compass issue more than 4,938,206 shares of Compass common stock or pay more than $231.75 million in cash in merger consideration. If there are more than 2,264 shares issued as a result of the exercise of TexasBanc stock options the consideration payable to each shareholder will be proportionately reduced if necessary to give effect to the foregoing limits. As of the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus, there were outstanding options to acquire 3,600 shares of TexasBanc common stock. All of the TexasBanc stock options had exercise prices below the value of the merger consideration as of the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus. Because TexasBanc option holders can pay the exercise price of their TexasBanc stock options either in cash or by surrendering shares of TexasBanc common stock, the exact number of shares of TexasBanc common stock to be issued as a result of the exercise of TexasBanc stock options will not be known until immediately before the closing of the merger.
 
Change in Control Payments
      TexasBanc and Compass have agreed that the completion of the merger will constitute a “change in control” under the change in control agreements with certain executive officers as set forth in the table under “— Benefits Table”. In full satisfaction of TexasBanc’s obligations under those agreements, immediately before the completion of the merger, each executive officer will receive their respective amounts, including

45



Table of Contents

those amounts set forth as “change in control payments” in the table under “— Benefits Table”. In connection with their receipt of such change in control payments, Messrs. Adams, Bryant, McNeil, O’Neil and Wallace, who are sometimes collectively referred to in this proxy statement/ prospectus as the “five executive officers”, will be required to sign and deliver to Compass a release of claims in favor of TexasBanc, Compass and their respective affiliates.
 
Special Bonus Payments
      At the time the merger is completed, each of Messrs. Adams, Bryant, McNeil, O’Neil and Wallace will receive a special bonus payment in the amount of $1,000,000, $2,500,000, $1,000,000, $1,250,000, and $750,000, respectively. In connection with their receipt of such special bonus payments, Messrs. Adams, Bryant, McNeil, O’Neil and Wallace will be required to sign and deliver to Compass a release of claims in favor of TexasBanc, Compass and their respective affiliates.
 
Stay Pay Agreements
      Each of the executive officers of TexasBanc have been provided stay pay agreements as an inducement for them to maintain their employment with TexasBank until the closing date of the merger or, in certain cases, until certain data conversion and implementation processes are complete after the merger. We refer to this period as the “stay period”. The table under “— Benefits Table” lists the amounts that each executive officer is entitled to receive under his or her respective stay pay agreement. Generally, the payment is to be made in a lump-sum at the end of the stay period, except Charles P. “Pat” Hamilton (who serves as Weatherford Banking Center President of TexasBank) and Lee Ann Capel (who serves as Chief Administration Officer and Executive Vice President of TexasBank) are to receive partial payments of $67,500 (25% of his stay pay amount) and $180,000 (50% of her stay pay amount), respectively, as of December 31, 2005, with the remaining balance to be paid when the merger is completed.
 
Salary Continuation Agreement
      Messrs. Bryant and Hamilton, and Roy Glenn Wright (who serves as Chief Lending Officer of TexasBank), previously entered into salary continuation agreements pursuant to which they each will receive payments of certain amounts upon the occurrence of certain events, including retirement, death, disability, termination of employment, or certain terminations of employment following a change of control of TexasBanc. The table under “— Benefits Table” lists the accelerated portion of the salary continuation pay that each of these executives will be entitled to receive under his respective salary continuation agreement upon termination of employment following a change of control as a result of the merger.
      The arrangements described above generally provide that the payments made under those arrangements will be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid the imposition of the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code and the loss of deductibility under Section 280G of the Code. However, by this proxy statement/ prospectus, TexasBanc is seeking shareholder approval under Section 280G of the Code of the payments to be made under these arrangements, and if such shareholder approval is obtained, the payments will not be reduced. See “Proposal 2 — Approval of 280G Payments” beginning on page 72 of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
 
TexasBank Nonqualified Senior Management Deferred Compensation Plan
      TexasBanc maintains the TexasBank Nonqualified Senior Management Deferred Compensation Plan, or Deferred Compensation Plan, which for tax purposes is an unfunded and nonqualified plan, for the benefit of certain employees of TexasBanc or its subsidiaries who are in management or who are highly compensated employees. The Deferred Compensation Plan provides the participating employees with the ability to defer the receipt of certain portions of their income received from TexasBanc (or the applicable participating subsidiary) and to receive credit for earnings on those amounts while deferred. TexasBanc (or the applicable participating subsidiary) may also make certain discretionary contributions, including a discretionary matching contribution, to the Deferred Compensation Plan on behalf of participating employees each year.

46



Table of Contents

Participants are 100% vested in their own contributions; however, discretionary contributions (and earnings thereon) made by TexasBanc (or the applicable participating subsidiary) are subject to a 5-year “cliff” vesting requirement (i.e., the employee is 0% vested in such amount and not entitled to such contributions or earnings on those amounts until 5 years after the contribution is made). However, upon a change of control, participants become vested in discretionary contributions and earnings on a 1 to 5 year “graded” vested schedule as follows:
         
Time Elapsed Following Crediting of Discretionary Contribution   Vested Percentage
     
Less Than 1 Year
    0%  
1 year or more, but less than 2 years
    20%  
2 year or more, but less than 3 years
    40%  
3 year or more, but less than 4 years
    60%  
4 year or more, but less than 5 years
    80%  
5 years or more
    100%  
      Therefore, to the extent that an employee participating in the Deferred Compensation Plan is not fully vested upon a change of control, the employee will receive accelerated vesting in the applicable percentage of his or her discretionary contributions and earnings with which the employee has been credited. Additionally, upon a change of control, TexasBanc’s Chairman of the Board immediately before the change of control has the right to appoint an independent third party to administer the Deferred Compensation Plan. The table under “— Benefits Table” below lists the directors and executive officers who have an interest in the Deferred Compensation Plan and the amount of the discretionary contribution that will vest as a result of the merger.
 
Severance Pay
      Under TexasBank’s severance pay policy, an employee of TexasBank (including employees of TexasBank who are executive officers of TexasBanc) will be eligible for severance pay if the employee’s employment is terminated, including a termination related to the merger, due to reduction in TexasBank’s work force or an elimination of the position. Two weeks severance pay will be granted for each year of service with TexasBank (severance pay will be prorated for partial years), up to a maximum of 26 weeks, in addition to all accrued and unused vacation. The table under “— Benefits Table” below lists the amounts of severance pay under this policy that the executive officers will receive in the event of a qualifying termination of employment, although the five executive officers waived their rights to severance under this policy pursuant to the terms of the new employment agreements with Compass.

47



Table of Contents

 
Benefits Table
      The table below provides the value of the indicated benefits* that may be received with respect to each applicable director or executive officer of TexasBanc.
                                                                 
                            Accelerated   Accelerated
                            Portion of   Portion of
    TexasBanc                   Change in   Deferred   Salary
    Stock   Option       Special Bonus   Severance   Control   Compensation   Continuation
Name   Options   Gross-Up   Stay Pay   Payment   Pay(1)   Payment   Plan Pay   Pay
                                 
William H. Adams, III
    250     $ 14,747     $ 360,000     $ 1,000,000     $ 32,548     $ 180,000     $ 20,000     $ 0  
Joe N. Barnhart
    0     $ 0     $ 65,000     $ 0     $ 47,562     $ 0     $ 1,000     $ 0  
    450     $ 29,493     $ 1,000,000     $ 2,500,000     $ 162,500     $ 510,000     $ 0     $ 139,511  
Lee Ann Capel
    300     $ 0     $ 360,000     $ 0     $ 69,231     $ 180,000     $ 20,000     $ 0  
Charles E. Cox
    200     $ 0     $ 174,000     $ 0     $ 39,952     $ 174,000     $ 11,000     $ 0  
William P. Cranz
    0     $ 0     $ 154,000     $ 0     $ 52,886     $ 0     $ 1,000     $ 0  
Lisanne Davidson
    0     $ 0     $ 152,000     $ 0     $ 21,126     $ 0     $ 1,000     $ 0  
William D. Gray
    0     $ 0     $ 300,000     $ 0     $ 11,349     $ 0     $ 1,000     $ 0  
Charles P. “Pat” Hamilton
    0     $ 0     $ 270,000     $ 0     $ 67,500     $ 0     $ 0     $ 27,590  
Robert R. Hampton
    0     $ 0     $ 65,775     $ 0     $ 32,123     $ 0     $ 0     $ 0  
    0     $ 0     $ 0     $ 0     $ 105,000     $ 0     $ 0     $ 0  
Bruce H. McNeil
    250     $ 14,747     $ 340,000     $ 1,000,000     $ 56,750     $ 170,000     $ 11,000     $ 0  
Glenn T. Monroe
    125     $ 36,572     $ 85,000     $ 0     $ 14,438     $ 255,000     $ 0     $ 0  
Damon S. “Stan” O’Neil
    400     $ 14,747     $ 400,000     $ 1,250,000     $ 64,215     $ 200,000     $ 20,000     $ 0  
James C. Parks, Jr. 
    250     $ 0     $ 131,250     $ 0     $ 30,058     $ 175,000     $ 0     $ 0  
Wayne W. “Wade” Wallace
    250     $ 66,383     $ 380,000     $ 750,000     $ 40,563     $ 190,000     $ 20,000     $ 0  
Roy Glenn Wright
    150     $ 0     $ 200,000     $ 0     $ 80,000     $ 0     $ 0     $ 24,677  
 
  * Benefit calculations are based on the assumption that the merger will become effective as of February 17, 2006 and the stock options will be exercised on that date.
(1)  Based on current salaries as of the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
 
(2)  Mr. Bryant’s change in control payment is payable pursuant to his salary continuation agreement and is in addition to his salary continuation pay.
      Compass and TexasBanc have agreed that, to the extent requested by Compass, certain of the arrangements described above, including the Deferred Compensation Plan and the Salary Continuation Agreements, will be terminated and the amounts payable thereunder distributed prior to the effective time of the merger and as early as December 31, 2005.
 
License Agreement
      TexasBank, a Texas banking association with its home office in Fort Worth, Texas and a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of TexasBanc, and Texas Bank, a Texas banking association with its home office in Brownwood, Texas, entered into a license agreement providing Brownwood with the limited, royalty-free, exclusive license to use the name TexasBank and certain related trademarks of TexasBank in a limited geographical area for a period of 10 years after the effective time of the merger. The geographic area includes the cities of Brownwood, Texas, Bangs, Texas, Dublin, Texas, Stephenville, Texas and within a 75 mile radius of each of those cities, but specifically excludes Bell County, Collin County, Dallas County, Denton County, Hood County, McLennan County, Parker County and Tarrant County. If during the term of the license agreement, TexasBank receives a stand alone offer by a third person to acquire the related trademarks, Brownwood will have the right of first and last refusal to acquire the same rights or assets on the same terms and conditions as offered by the third party.

48



Table of Contents

      Bill Knight, Chairman of the Board of TexasBanc, serves as a director of Brownwood, and Mr. Knight, together with Dorothy Doss, a director of TexasBanc, beneficially own approximately 68% of the outstanding common stock of Brownwood.
 
Director and Officers Indemnification and Insurance</