Filed On 1/19/06 11:57am ET · SEC File 333-129940 · Accession Number 950129-6-405
As Of Filer Filing As/For/On Docs:Pgs Issuer Agent
1/19/06 Compass Bancshares Inc 424B3 1:179 950129
Document/Exhibit Description Pages Size
1: 424B3 Compass Bancshares, Inc.- Registration HTML 1,117K
No.333-129940
| Page | (sequential) | | | | (alphabetic) | Top |
|---|
| | |
- Alternative Formats (RTF, XML, et al.)
- Accounting Treatment
- Additional Agreements
- Agreement and Plan of Merger (including amendment)
- Agreement and Plan of Merger, The
- Amended and Restated Shareholder Voting Agreement
- Appendix A
- Appendix B
- Appendix C
- Appendix D
- Appendix E
- Background of the Merger
- Benefits Table
- Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
- Certain TexasBanc Directors and Executive Officers May Have Interests in the Merger that are Different from, or in Addition to, Their Interests as Shareholders
- Change in Control Payments
- Comparison of Shareholders Rights
- Compass
- Completion of the Merger is Subject to Certain Conditions, The
- Conditions to Completion of the Merger
- Conduct of Compass Business Pending the Merger
- Conduct of TexasBanc Business Pending the Merger
- Conversion of Shares
- Description of Compass Capital Stock
- Director and Officers Indemnification and Insurance
- Dissenters Rights
- Dissenting Shares
- Effective Time
- Employee Benefits Matters
- Employment Agreements
- Experts
- For
- General
- Governmental and Regulatory Approvals
- Information About Compass
- Information About Texasbanc
- In Order to Make an Election, TexasBanc s Shareholders Must Properly Complete and Deliver an Election Form Before the Election Deadline, which is 5:00 p.m. New York time on February 15, 2006
- Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger
- Legal Matters
- License Agreement
- Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
- Matters to be Considered at the Special Meeting
- Merger Consideration
- No Solicitation of Other Proposals
- Opinion of TexasBanc s Financial Advisor
- Other Business, Adjournment and Postponements
- Other Matters
- Plan of Distribution
- Price Range of Common Stock and Dividends
- Procedures for Making Elections
- Proposal 1. Approval of the Agreement and Plan of Merger the Merger
- Proposal 2. Approval of 280g Payments
- Provisions of Texas Law Relating to Dissenting Shareholders
- Questions and Answers About the Merger and the Special Meeting
- Quorum; Abstention and Broker Non-Votes
- Recommendation of TexasBanc s Board and Its Reasons for the Merger
- Record Date for the Special Meeting and Voting Rights
- Regardless of Whether You make a Cash Election or a Stock Election, You May Not Receive the Consideration You Elect
- Registration Rights Agreement
- Registration Rights Agreement (including amended and restated joinder agreement)
- Representations and Warranties
- Required Votes
- Restrictions on Resales by Affiliates
- Rights of TexasBanc s Shareholders After the Merger Will be Different, The
- Risk Factors
- Salary Continuation Agreement
- Sandler O Neil & Partners L.P. Fairness Opinion, dated September 17, 2005
- Selected Historical Financial Data
- Selling Stockholders
- Selling Stockholders; Plan of Distribution
- Severance Pay
- Shareholder Approval of the 280G Payments
- Shareholder Vote
- Special Bonus Payments
- Special Meeting
- Special Meeting of TexasBanc
- Stay Pay Agreements
- Stock Exchange Listing
- Structure
- Summary
- Supervision and Regulation
- Table of Contents
- Termination of the Agreement and Plan of Merger
- TexasBanc
- TexasBanc Has Agreed When and How TexasBanc and its Subsidiaries Can Consider Third-Party Acquisition Proposals
- TexasBanc s Financial Advisors Have Provided an Opinion as to the Fairness of the Merger Consideration, from a Financial Point of View, to TexasBanc s Shareholders
- TexasBanc Shareholder Vote Required to Approve the Merger and 280G Payments
- TexasBanc s Shareholders Will Receive Cash or Shares of Compass Common Stock in the Merger For Each Whole Share of TexasBanc Common Stock Depending on Their Election and any Adjustment
- TexasBank Nonqualified Senior Management Deferred Compensation Plan
- The Agreement and Plan of Merger
- The Completion of the Merger is Subject to Certain Conditions
- The Rights of TexasBanc s Shareholders After the Merger Will be Different
- Time and Place of Special Meeting
- Treatment of TexasBanc Stock Options
- Voting By Proxy
- Waiver and Amendment of the Agreement and Plan of Merger
- We Have Not Yet Obtained All Regulatory Approvals
- What Will Happen to Outstanding TexasBanc Options
- Where You Can Find More Information
- Who We Are
|
| 1 | 1st Page
|
| " | Table of Contents
|
| " | Summary
|
| " | Who We Are
|
| " | For
|
| " | TexasBanc s Financial Advisors Have Provided an Opinion as to the Fairness of the Merger Consideration, from a Financial Point of View, to TexasBanc s Shareholders
|
| " | TexasBanc s Shareholders Will Receive Cash or Shares of Compass Common Stock in the Merger For Each Whole Share of TexasBanc Common Stock Depending on Their Election and any Adjustment
|
| " | Regardless of Whether You make a Cash Election or a Stock Election, You May Not Receive the Consideration You Elect
|
| " | In Order to Make an Election, TexasBanc s Shareholders Must Properly Complete and Deliver an Election Form Before the Election Deadline, which is 5:00 p.m. New York time on February 15, 2006
|
| " | What Will Happen to Outstanding TexasBanc Options
|
| " | Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
|
| " | Shareholder Approval of the 280G Payments
|
| " | TexasBanc Shareholder Vote Required to Approve the Merger and 280G Payments
|
| " | Dissenters Rights
|
| " | Certain TexasBanc Directors and Executive Officers May Have Interests in the Merger that are Different from, or in Addition to, Their Interests as Shareholders
|
| " | TexasBanc Has Agreed When and How TexasBanc and its Subsidiaries Can Consider Third-Party Acquisition Proposals
|
| " | Accounting Treatment
|
| " | The Completion of the Merger is Subject to Certain Conditions
|
| " | We Have Not Yet Obtained All Regulatory Approvals
|
| " | Termination of the Agreement and Plan of Merger
|
| " | Amended and Restated Shareholder Voting Agreement
|
| " | The Rights of TexasBanc s Shareholders After the Merger Will be Different
|
| " | Special Meeting of TexasBanc
|
| " | Selected Historical Financial Data
|
| " | Compass
|
| " | TexasBanc
|
| " | Questions and Answers About the Merger and the Special Meeting
|
| " | Risk Factors
|
| " | Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
|
| " | Special Meeting
|
| " | Time and Place of Special Meeting
|
| " | Matters to be Considered at the Special Meeting
|
| " | Record Date for the Special Meeting and Voting Rights
|
| " | Required Votes
|
| " | Quorum; Abstention and Broker Non-Votes
|
| " | Voting By Proxy
|
| " | Other Business, Adjournment and Postponements
|
| " | Proposal 1. Approval of the Agreement and Plan of Merger the Merger
|
| " | General
|
| " | Background of the Merger
|
| " | Recommendation of TexasBanc s Board and Its Reasons for the Merger
|
| " | Opinion of TexasBanc s Financial Advisor
|
| " | Governmental and Regulatory Approvals
|
| " | Procedures for Making Elections
|
| " | Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger
|
| " | Employment Agreements
|
| " | Treatment of TexasBanc Stock Options
|
| " | Change in Control Payments
|
| " | Special Bonus Payments
|
| " | Stay Pay Agreements
|
| " | Salary Continuation Agreement
|
| " | TexasBank Nonqualified Senior Management Deferred Compensation Plan
|
| " | Severance Pay
|
| " | Benefits Table
|
| " | License Agreement
|
| " | Director and Officers Indemnification and Insurance
|
| " | The Agreement and Plan of Merger
|
| " | Structure
|
| " | Effective Time
|
| " | Merger Consideration
|
| " | Conversion of Shares
|
| " | Dissenting Shares
|
| " | Conduct of TexasBanc Business Pending the Merger
|
| " | Conduct of Compass Business Pending the Merger
|
| " | Representations and Warranties
|
| " | Employee Benefits Matters
|
| " | Conditions to Completion of the Merger
|
| " | Shareholder Vote
|
| " | No Solicitation of Other Proposals
|
| " | Additional Agreements
|
| " | Waiver and Amendment of the Agreement and Plan of Merger
|
| " | Stock Exchange Listing
|
| " | Restrictions on Resales by Affiliates
|
| " | Registration Rights Agreement
|
| " | Selling Stockholders; Plan of Distribution
|
| " | Selling Stockholders
|
| " | Plan of Distribution
|
| " | Proposal 2. Approval of 280g Payments
|
| " | Price Range of Common Stock and Dividends
|
| " | Information About Compass
|
| " | Information About Texasbanc
|
| " | Supervision and Regulation
|
| " | Description of Compass Capital Stock
|
| " | Comparison of Shareholders Rights
|
| " | Other Matters
|
| " | Legal Matters
|
| " | Experts
|
| " | Where You Can Find More Information
|
| " | Appendix A
|
| " | Agreement and Plan of Merger (including amendment)
|
| " | Appendix B
|
| " | Sandler O Neil & Partners L.P. Fairness Opinion, dated September 17, 2005
|
| " | Appendix C
|
| " | Appendix D
|
| " | Provisions of Texas Law Relating to Dissenting Shareholders
|
| " | Appendix E
|
| " | Registration Rights Agreement (including amended and restated joinder agreement)
|
This is an EDGAR HTML document rendered as filed. [ Alternative Formats ]
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Dear Fellow Shareholders:
You are cordially invited to attend a special meeting of
shareholders of TexasBanc Holding Co. to be held at The
Fort Worth Club, located at 306 West
7
th Street
12
th Floor,
Fort Worth,
Texas 76102 at 2:00 p.m., local time on
Thursday,
February 16, 2006.
At the special meeting, you will be asked to take certain action
in connection with an Agreement and
Plan of Merger, as amended,
among TexasBanc, Compass Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly-owned
subsidiary, XYZ Acquisition Corp. In the merger, XYZ Acquisition
Corp. will merge with and into TexasBanc and subsequently
TexasBanc will merge with and into Compass.
Each TexasBanc shareholder will be entitled to elect to receive
for each share of TexasBanc common stock either shares of
Compass common stock or cash, subject to the amount of shares
and cash available and the election and allocation procedures in
the agreement and
plan of merger. YOU MUST MAKE THIS ELECTION BY
5:00 P.M. NEW YORK TIME ON WEDNESDAY,
FEBRUARY 15,
2006. Enclosed is a Form of Election and Letter of Transmittal,
together with an envelope addressed to Continental Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, which may be used for this
purpose.
Generally, to the extent that you receive Compass common stock,
the merger will be tax-free to you, other than with respect to
any cash consideration or cash you receive for fractional shares.
If the merger is completed, you will receive, at your
election (but subject to proration and adjustment as
provided in the agreement and
plan of merger), cash or shares of
Compass common stock, in either case, having a value equal to
$1,252.97 plus the product of 26.6987 multiplied by the average
closing price of Compass common stock for the ten trading days
immediately before completion of the merger, for each share of
TexasBanc common stock you hold immediately before the
completion date of the merger. On
September 15, 2005, two
days before the merger was publicly announced, the ten-day
average closing per share price of Compass common stock was
$46.93; if that were the average closing price of Compass common
stock under the agreement and
plan of merger, it would result in
consideration per share of TexasBanc common stock of
approximately $2,505.94 in cash or 53.3974 shares of
Compass common stock. On
January 12, 2006, the latest
practicable date before the printing of this proxy statement/
prospectus, the ten-day average closing per share price of
Compass common stock was $48.895; if that were the average
closing price of Compass common stock under the agreement and
plan of merger, it would result in consideration per share of
TexasBanc common stock of approximately $2,558.40 in cash or
52.3244 shares of Compass common stock. These calculations
of the merger consideration assume that approximately
2,264 shares of TexasBanc common stock will be issued on
exercise of outstanding TexasBanc stock options. In no event
will Compass issue more than 4,938,206 shares of Compass
common stock or pay more than $231.75 million in cash in
merger consideration, including if there are more than
2,264 shares of TexasBanc common stock issued as a result
of the exercise of TexasBanc stock options, and the
consideration payable to each shareholder will be
proportionately reduced if necessary to give effect to these
limits.
The actual value of the merger consideration on the completion
date of the merger that you will receive for each share of
TexasBanc common stock will depend in part on the average
closing price of Compass common stock for the ten trading days
immediately before the completion date of the merger. If you
receive Compass common stock as merger consideration, the price
per share of Compass common stock on the date you receive the
shares may be different than the average closing price of
Compass common stock on the NASDAQ for the ten trading days
immediately before the completion of the merger. These prices
are impossible to know at this time and will not be known at the
time of the special meeting. Therefore, the actual value of the
merger consideration may be different than the estimated value
based on the current price or the price at the time of the
special meeting. Compass common stock is traded on the NASDAQ
National Market under the trading symbol “CBSS.” You
may obtain current market prices for Compass’ common stock
through newspapers, from reputable internet sources or from your
broker.
As explained in more detail on pages 51 through 55 of this
document, the dollar value of the consideration that you will
receive upon completion of the merger will be approximately the
same as of the completion of the merger regardless of whether
you make a cash election or a stock election. Since elections
are subject to potential proration as described on pages 54
and 55 of this document, there can be no assurance that you will
receive the type of consideration you elect as to all your
shares of TexasBanc common stock.
Based on the estimated number of shares of TexasBanc common
stock on the record date of the special meeting, Compass expects
to issue 4,938,206 shares of Compass common stock to
TexasBanc’s shareholders in connection with the merger.
Immediately after the merger, former TexasBanc’s
shareholders are currently expected to own approximately 4.0% of
the then-outstanding shares of Compass common stock (without
giving effect to shares of Compass common stock held by
TexasBanc’s shareholders before the merger).
Holders of approximately 82% of the outstanding TexasBanc common
stock have agreed with Compass to vote in favor of the agreement
and
plan of merger.
After careful consideration, TexasBanc’s board of
directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR”
approval of the agreement and plan of merger.
To complete the merger, holders of two-thirds of the outstanding
shares of TexasBanc common stock must approve the agreement and
plan of merger.
Your vote is very important regardless of the
number of shares of TexasBanc common stock you own. If you fail
to vote your shares, either in person or by proxy, this will
have the effect of a vote against the agreement and plan of
merger and the transactions contemplated by the agreement and
plan of merger, including the merger. Whether or not you
expect to attend the special meeting, please vote as soon as
possible to ensure that your shares are represented at the
meeting. You may vote your shares by marking your votes on the
proxy card, signing and dating it and mailing it with the
envelope provided. If you sign and return your proxy card
without specifying your choice, it will be understood that you
wish to have your shares voted
“FOR” the agreement and
plan of merger and
“FOR” approval of the payments to
be made to certain executive officers of TexasBanc.
This document provides you with detailed information about the
merger. In addition to being a proxy statement of TexasBanc,
this document is also the prospectus of Compass for Compass
common stock that will be issued to you in connection with the
merger. We encourage you to read the entire document carefully.
Please pay particular attention to “Risk
Factors” beginning on page 17 for a discussion of
the risks related to the merger and owning Compass common stock
after the merger.
Compass common stock is publicly traded through the NASDAQ
National Market. Compass’ trading symbol is
“CBSS”. There is no public trading market for
TexasBanc’s common stock.
NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE
SECURITIES REGULATORS HAVE APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THE
SECURITIES TO BE ISSUED IN THE MERGER OR DETERMINED IF THIS
DOCUMENT IS TRUTHFUL OR COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE
CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
THE SHARES OF COMPASS COMMON STOCK TO BE ISSUED IN THE MERGER
ARE NOT DEPOSITS OR SAVINGS ACCOUNTS OR OTHER OBLIGATIONS OF ANY
BANK OR SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, AND ARE NOT INSURED BY THE FEDERAL
DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION OR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This proxy statement/ prospectus incorporates important business
and financial information about Compass Bancshares, Inc. from
other documents that are not included in or delivered with this
proxy statement/ prospectus. This information is available to
you without charge upon your written or oral request. You can
obtain those
documents incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/ prospectus by accessing the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s
website maintained at
www.sec.gov
or by requesting copies in writing or by telephone from
Compass at the following address:
Compass Bancshares, Inc.
Ed Bilek
15 South
20th Street
TexasBanc is not subject to the reporting and informational
requirements maintained by the Securities and Exchange
Commission and does not file reports or other information with
Securities and Exchange Commission.
If you would like to request documents, please do so by
February 9, 2006 in order to receive them before the
special meeting. If you request any documents incorporated
by reference from Compass, Compass will mail them to you within
one business day by first-class mail, or similar means.
You should rely only on the information contained or
incorporated by reference in this document in determining how to
vote your shares at the special meeting. Compass and TexasBanc
have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that
is different from what is contained in this document. This
document is dated
January 18, 2006. You should not assume
that the information contained in this document is accurate as
of any date other than that date, and neither the mailing of
this document to shareholders nor the issuance of Compass’
common stock in the merger creates any implication to the
contrary.
See “Where You Can Find More Information” on
page 94.
TEXASBANC HOLDING CO.
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To the Shareholders of TexasBanc Holding Co.:
TexasBanc Holding Co. will hold a special meeting of
shareholders at The Fort Worth Club, located at
306 West
7
th Street
12
th Floor,
Fort Worth,
Texas 76102 on Thursday,
February 16, 2006
at 2:00 p.m., local time, for the following purposes:
|
|
| |
1. To approve and adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated September 17, 2005, as amended, among Compass
Bancshares, Inc., XYZ Acquisition Corp., Compass’
wholly-owned subsidiary, and TexasBanc Holding Co., as it may be
amended from time to time, by which Compass will acquire
TexasBanc through the merger of XYZ Acquisition Corp. with and
into TexasBanc and the subsequent merger of TexasBanc into
Compass. A copy of the agreement and plan of merger is attached
as Appendix A to the accompanying proxy statement/
prospectus of which this notice is a part. This proposal is
described more fully in the proxy statement/ prospectus of which
this notice is a part. |
| |
| |
2. To approve payments to certain executive officers in
connection with the merger that separately or in the aggregate
could reasonably be expected to result in the payment of any
“parachute payments” within the meaning of
Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. The payments are
referred to as 280G Payments, and this proposal is described
more fully in the proxy statement/ prospectus of which this
notice is a part. |
No other business will be transacted at the special meeting. We
have fixed the close of business on
December 30, 2005 as
the record date for determining those shareholders entitled to
vote at the special meeting. Only TexasBanc shareholders of
record at the close of business on that date are entitled to
notice of the special meeting, and only the shareholders of
record of TexasBanc common stock at the close of business on
that date are entitled to vote at the special meeting. In order
for the agreement and
plan of merger to be approved by
TexasBanc’s shareholders, the holders of two-thirds of the
outstanding shares of TexasBanc common stock entitled to vote
must vote for of approval of the agreement and
plan of merger.
Approval of the 280G Payments requires the affirmative vote of
more than 75% of TexasBanc capital stock entitled to vote,
excluding those shares held or constructively owned by the
executive officers whose compensation is being considered.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as
votes against each of the proposals being presented. If you wish
to attend the special meeting and your shares are held in the
name of a broker, trust, bank or other nominee, you must bring
with you a proxy or letter from the broker, trustee, bank or
nominee to confirm your beneficial ownership of the shares. In
compliance with Article 2.27 of the Texas Business
Corporation Act, a list of shareholders entitled to vote at the
special meeting will be available for inspection by any
shareholder at the offices of TexasBanc during usual business
hours for a period of ten days before the special meeting. The
list of shareholders will also be available for inspection at
the special meeting from 1:00 p.m., local time, until
adjournment of the special meeting.
If you do not vote in favor of the agreement and
plan of merger
and you strictly comply with the procedures set forth in
Article 5.11, 5.12 and 5.13 of the Texas Business
Corporation Act, you will be entitled to obtain payment in cash
of the fair market value of your shares of common stock as
determined under these provisions. A copy of these provisions is
included as
Appendix D to this document, and a
summary of these provisions can be found in the section titled
“The Agreement and Plan of Merger —
Dissenters’ Rights” beginning on page 63 of this
document.
Fort Worth, Texas
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF SHARES YOU
MAY OWN. TEXASBANC’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS SINCERELY DESIRES
YOUR PRESENCE AT THE SPECIAL MEETING. HOWEVER, SO THAT TEXASBANC
MAY BE SURE THAT YOUR VOTE WILL BE INCLUDED, PLEASE COMPLETE,
DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD PROMPTLY. YOU MAY
REVOKE YOUR PROXY AT ANY TIME BEFORE IT IS VOTED AT THE MEETING.
IF YOU ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING, YOU MAY VOTE IN PERSON IF YOU
WISH, EVEN IF YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY RETURNED YOUR PROXY CARD.
TEXASBANC’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS
THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF
MERGER. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, WITH VERNON BRYANT ABSTAINING,
ALSO RECOMMENDS YOU VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE 280G
PAYMENTS.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
| |
|
|
|
1 |
|
| |
|
|
|
1 |
|
| |
|
|
|
2 |
|
| |
|
|
|
2 |
|
| |
|
|
|
2 |
|
| |
|
|
|
4 |
|
| |
|
|
|
4 |
|
| |
|
|
|
5 |
|
| |
|
|
|
5 |
|
| |
|
|
|
5 |
|
| |
|
|
|
6 |
|
| |
|
|
|
6 |
|
| |
|
|
|
6 |
|
| |
|
|
|
7 |
|
| |
|
|
|
7 |
|
| |
|
|
|
7 |
|
| |
|
|
|
7 |
|
| |
|
|
|
8 |
|
| |
|
|
|
8 |
|
| |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
| |
|
|
|
9 |
|
| |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
| |
|
|
|
23 |
|
| |
|
|
|
23 |
|
| |
|
|
|
23 |
|
| |
|
|
|
23 |
|
| |
|
|
|
23 |
|
| |
|
|
|
24 |
|
| |
|
|
|
25 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
| |
|
|
|
26 |
|
| |
|
|
|
26 |
|
| |
|
|
|
29 |
|
| |
|
|
|
31 |
|
| |
|
|
|
38 |
|
| |
|
|
|
38 |
|
| |
|
|
|
41 |
|
| |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
| |
|
|
|
44 |
|
| |
|
|
|
45 |
|
| |
|
|
|
45 |
|
| |
|
|
|
46 |
|
| |
|
|
|
46 |
|
| |
|
|
|
46 |
|
| |
|
|
|
46 |
|
| |
|
|
|
47 |
|
| |
|
|
|
48 |
|
| |
|
|
|
48 |
|
| |
|
|
|
49 |
|
| |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
| |
|
|
|
50 |
|
| |
|
|
|
50 |
|
| |
|
|
|
51 |
|
| |
|
|
|
55 |
|
| |
|
|
|
55 |
|
| |
|
|
|
56 |
|
| |
|
|
|
57 |
|
| |
|
|
|
57 |
|
| |
|
|
|
58 |
|
| |
|
|
|
59 |
|
| |
|
|
|
59 |
|
| |
|
|
|
60 |
|
| |
|
|
|
60 |
|
| |
|
|
|
61 |
|
| |
|
|
|
62 |
|
| |
|
|
|
62 |
|
| |
|
|
|
62 |
|
| |
|
|
|
63 |
|
| |
|
|
|
65 |
|
| |
|
|
|
66 |
|
ii
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
66 |
|
| |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
| |
|
|
|
69 |
|
| |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
iii
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information from this proxy
statement/ prospectus and may not contain all of the information
that is important to you. To understand the merger fully and for
a more complete description of the legal terms of the merger,
you should carefully read this entire document and the other
documents to which Compass and TexasBanc have referred you,
including the Appendices to this proxy statement/ prospectus.
For more information about Compass and TexasBanc see “Where
You Can Find More Information” on page 94.
Compass is a Delaware corporation which was organized in 1970.
It is a financial holding company registered with the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System under the Bank Holding
Company Act. Most of Compass’ revenues are from its bank
subsidiaries located in Texas, Alabama, Florida, Arizona,
Colorado and New Mexico.
As of
September 30, 2005, Compass and its
subsidiaries had
consolidated assets of $30.1 billion, consolidated deposits
of $18.8 billion, and total shareholders’ equity of
$2.2 billion. See
“Where You Can Find More
Information” on page 94;
“Selected Historical
Financial Data” beginning on page 9; and
“Information About Compass” on page 78.
TexasBanc is a Texas corporation that was organized in 1986. It
is a bank holding company registered with the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System under the Bank Holding Company
Act. Virtually all of TexasBanc’s revenues are from its
sole bank subsidiary, TexasBank, with its home office in
Fort Worth, Texas.
As of
September 30, 2005, TexasBanc had, on a consolidated
basis, total assets of $1.686 billion, total deposits of
$1.459 million, and total shareholders’ equity of
$129.7 million. See
“Information About TexasBanc”
beginning on page 79.
|
|
|
TexasBanc’s Board Recommends that You Vote
“For” the Agreement and Plan of Merger;
TexasBanc’s Reasons for Merger (page 29) |
TexasBanc’s board of directors has determined that the
merger is advisable and in your best interests and unanimously
recommends that you vote
“FOR” the agreement
and
plan of merger.
In its deliberations and in making its determination,
TexasBanc’s board of directors considered many factors
including, without limitation, the following:
|
|
|
| |
• |
TexasBanc’s board of directors’ familiarity with and
review of information concerning the business, results of
operations, financial condition, competitive position and future
prospects of TexasBanc; |
| |
| |
• |
the current and prospective environment in which TexasBanc
operates, including national, regional and local economic
conditions, the competitive environment for banks, thrifts and
other financial institutions generally and the increased
regulatory burdens on financial institutions generally and the
trend toward consolidation in the banking industry and in the
financial services industry; |
| |
| |
• |
the financial presentation of Sandler O’Neill and the
opinion of Sandler O’Neill dated as of September 17,
2005, that, as of September 17, 2005 (the date on which
TexasBanc’s board of directors approved the agreement and
plan of merger), and subject to the assumptions, limitations and
qualifications set forth in the opinion, the total aggregate
consideration to be received from Compass, which consisted of no
more than $231.75 million in cash and 4.938 million
shares of Compass common |
1
|
|
|
| |
|
stock, including a cashless exercise of all outstanding
TexasBanc options, is fair, from a financial point of view, to
the holders of TexasBanc’s common stock (see
“— Opinion of TexasBanc’s Financial
Adviser,” beginning on page 31); |
| |
| |
• |
the results that could be expected to be obtained by TexasBanc
if it continued to operate independently, and the likely
benefits to shareholders of such course, as compared with the
value of the merger consideration being offered by Compass; |
| |
| |
• |
that holders of approximately 82% of the shares of TexasBanc
common stock had indicated their willingness to sign the
shareholder voting agreement, whereby they would agree to vote
the shares of TexasBanc common stock beneficially owned by them
in favor of the agreement and plan of merger; |
| |
| |
• |
that some of TexasBanc’s directors and executive officers
have other financial interests in the merger that are in
addition to their interests as TexasBanc shareholders, including
interests created as a result of employment and compensation
arrangements with TexasBanc and the manner in which they would
be affected by the merger, as well as the new employment
agreements that certain of these persons entered into with
Compass in connection with the merger; |
|
|
|
TexasBanc’s Financial Advisors Have Provided an
Opinion as to the Fairness of the Merger Consideration, from a
Financial Point of View, to TexasBanc’s Shareholders
(page 31) |
Sandler O’Neil & Partners, L.P. delivered its
opinion to TexasBanc’s board of directors that, as of
September 17, 2005 and based upon and subject to the
factors and assumptions set forth in the opinion, the aggregate
merger consideration to be received by holders of the
outstanding shares of common stock of TexasBanc under the
agreement and
plan of merger was fair from a financial point of
view to such holders.
The full text of the written opinion of
Sandler O’Neil,
dated
September 17, 2005, which sets forth assumptions
made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on
the review undertaken in connection with the opinion, is
attached as Appendix B to this proxy statement/ prospectus.
TexasBanc’s shareholders should read the opinion in its
entirety.
Sandler O’Neil provided its opinion for the
information and assistance of TexasBanc’s board of
directors in connection with its consideration of the
transaction. The
Sandler O’Neil opinion is not a
recommendation as to how any holder of TexasBanc common stock
should vote or make any election with respect to the transaction.
|
|
|
TexasBanc’s Shareholders Will Receive Cash or Shares
of Compass Common Stock in the Merger For Each Whole Share of
TexasBanc Common Stock Depending on Their Election and any
Adjustment (page 51) |
TexasBanc’s shareholders will have the right to elect to
receive merger consideration for each of their shares of
TexasBanc common stock in the form of cash or shares of Compass
common stock, subject to proration and adjustment as described
below. The election must be made with respect to a whole share
and not any portion of a share. In the event of proration and
adjustment, a TexasBanc shareholder may receive a portion of the
merger consideration in a form other than that which the
shareholder elected. The proration and adjustment will be made
with respect to a whole shares and not any portion of a share.
|
|
|
Regardless of Whether You make a Cash Election or a Stock
Election, You May Not Receive the Consideration You Elect
(page 54) |
The aggregate number of shares of Compass common stock that will
be issued and the aggregate amount of cash that will be paid to
TexasBanc’s shareholders as consideration in the merger are
fixed at 4,938,206 shares and $231.75 million in cash,
respectively. As a result, depending on the number of
shareholders who elect to receive Compass common stock or cash,
shareholders electing the over-subscribed form of consideration
will be proportionately cut back and will receive a portion of
their consideration in the other form, despite their
election. In addition, if there are more than
2,264 shares of TexasBanc common stock issued as a result
of the exercise of TexasBanc’s stock options, the
consideration payable to each shareholder will be
proportionately reduced if necessary to give effect to the above
limits.
The value of the merger consideration to be received by
TexasBanc’s shareholders will fluctuate with the market
price of Compass common stock and will be determined in part
based on the average closing price on
2
the NASDAQ of Compass common stock for the ten trading days
immediately before the completion date of the merger. As
explained in more detail in “The Agreement and Plan of
Merger — Merger Consideration” beginning on
page 51, if you are TexasBanc shareholder, whether you make
a cash election or a stock election, the value of the
consideration (before tax) that you will receive as of the date
of completion of the merger will be substantially the same based
on the average Compass closing price used to calculate the
merger consideration.
TexasBanc’s shareholders may specify different elections
with respect to different shares that they hold (if, for
example, you own 100 shares of TexasBanc common stock, you
could make a cash election with respect to 50 shares and a
stock election with respect to the other 50 shares).
Set forth below is a table showing a hypothetical range of
ten-day average closing prices for a share of Compass common
stock and the corresponding consideration that a TexasBanc
shareholder would receive in a cash election, on the one hand,
or in a stock election, on the other hand, under the merger
consideration formula.
As described below, regardless of
whether you make a cash election or a stock election, you may
nevertheless receive a mix of cash and stock due to proration
and adjustment. The proration and adjustment will be made
with respect to whole shares and not any portion of a share.
Based on the closing price of Compass common stock on the NASDAQ
for the ten trading days ending
January 12, 2006, the last
practicable date before the printing of this proxy statement/
prospectus, the ten-day average price for a share of Compass
common stock was $48.895. The table does not reflect that cash
will be paid instead of fractional shares and assumes that
2,264 shares of TexasBanc common stock will be issued on
exercise of outstanding TexasBanc stock options. In no event
will Compass issue more than 4,938,206 shares of Compass
common stock or pay more than $231.75 million in cash in
merger consideration, including if there are more than
2,264 shares issued as a result of the exercise of
TexasBanc’s stock options, and the consideration payable to
each shareholder will be proportionately reduced if necessary to
give effect to these limits.
Total Merger Consideration
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Number of Shares of | |
|
|
| Hypothetical Ten-Day | |
|
Cash Consideration | |
|
Compass Common | |
|
Market Value of | |
| Average Closing Sales | |
|
per Share of | |
|
Stock per Share of | |
|
Stock Consideration | |
| Price for Compass | |
|
TexasBanc | |
|
TexasBanc Common | |
|
of TexasBanc | |
| Common Stock | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
Stock | |
|
Common Stock* | |
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| $ |
35.00 |
|
|
|
2,187.42 |
|
|
|
62.4978 |
|
|
|
2,187.42 |
|
| |
36.00 |
|
|
|
2,214.12 |
|
|
|
61.5034 |
|
|
|
2,214.12 |
|
| |
37.00 |
|
|
|
2,240.82 |
|
|
|
60.5628 |
|
|
|
2,240.82 |
|
| |
38.00 |
|
|
|
2,267.52 |
|
|
|
59.6716 |
|
|
|
2,267.52 |
|
| |
39.00 |
|
|
|
2,294.22 |
|
|
|
58.8261 |
|
|
|
2,294.22 |
|
| |
40.00 |
|
|
|
2,320.92 |
|
|
|
58.0230 |
|
|
|
2,320.92 |
|
| |
41.00 |
|
|
|
2,347.62 |
|
|
|
57.2589 |
|
|
|
2,347.62 |
|
| |
42.00 |
|
|
|
2,374.32 |
|
|
|
56.5313 |
|
|
|
2,374.32 |
|
| |
43.00 |
|
|
|
2,401.01 |
|
|
|
55.8376 |
|
|
|
2,401.01 |
|
| |
44.00 |
|
|
|
2,427.71 |
|
|
|
55.1753 |
|
|
|
2,427.71 |
|
| |
45.00 |
|
|
|
2,454.41 |
|
|
|
54.5425 |
|
|
|
2,454.41 |
|
| |
46.00 |
|
|
|
2,481.11 |
|
|
|
53.9372 |
|
|
|
2,481.11 |
|
| |
47.00 |
|
|
|
2,507.81 |
|
|
|
53.3576 |
|
|
|
2,507.81 |
|
| |
48.00 |
|
|
|
2,534.51 |
|
|
|
52.8022 |
|
|
|
2,534.51 |
|
| |
49.00 |
|
|
|
2,561.21 |
|
|
|
52.2695 |
|
|
|
2,561.21 |
|
| |
50.00 |
|
|
|
2,587.91 |
|
|
|
51.7581 |
|
|
|
2,587.91 |
|
| |
51.00 |
|
|
|
2,614.60 |
|
|
|
51.2667 |
|
|
|
2,614.60 |
|
| |
52.00 |
|
|
|
2,641.30 |
|
|
|
50.7943 |
|
|
|
2,641.30 |
|
| |
53.00 |
|
|
|
2,668.00 |
|
|
|
50.3396 |
|
|
|
2,668.00 |
|
| |
54.00 |
|
|
|
2,694.70 |
|
|
|
49.9018 |
|
|
|
2,694.70 |
|
| |
55.00 |
|
|
|
2,721.40 |
|
|
|
49.4800 |
|
|
|
2,721.40 |
|
|
|
| * |
Based on the hypothetical ten-day average closing price of
Compass common stock. |
The examples above are illustrative only. If you are a TexasBanc
shareholder, the value of the merger consideration that you
actually receive will be based in part on the actual average
closing price of Compass
3
common stock on the NASDAQ for the ten trading days immediately
before the completion date of the merger, as described below. If
that average price is not set forth in the table above,
including because the price is outside the range of the amounts
set forth above, TexasBanc does not intend to re-solicit proxies
from its shareholders in connection with the merger.
The merger consideration to be received for each share of
TexasBanc common stock will be based in part on the arithmetic
average of the closing prices of Compass common stock reported
on the NASDAQ for the ten consecutive trading days immediately
before the completion date of the merger. Based on the average
closing price of Compass common stock on the ten trading days
ending
January 12, 2006, which was $48.895, for each of
your shares of TexasBanc common stock you would receive either
approximately $2,558.40 in cash or 52.3244 shares of
Compass common stock, subject to possible proration and
adjustment. However, we will compute the actual amount of cash
and number of shares of Compass common stock you will receive in
the merger using the formula contained in the agreement and plan
of merger. For a summary of the formula contained in the
agreement and
plan of merger, see
“The Agreement and Plan
of Merger — Merger Consideration” beginning on
page 51.
The consideration to be paid to shareholders cannot be
determined until the close of trading on the trading day
immediately before the completion date of the merger.
|
|
|
In Order to Make an Election, TexasBanc’s
Shareholders Must Properly Complete and Deliver an Election
Form Before the Election Deadline, which is 5:00 p.m.
New York time on February 15, 2006 (page 42) |
At the time this proxy statement/ prospectus is mailed, an
exchange agent will mail or deliver to holders of record a
form of election and transmittal materials. You must
properly complete and deliver to the exchange agent the election
materials along with your stock certificates. Please do not
send your stock certificates or form of election with your
proxy card for the special meeting.
Forms of election and stock certificates must be received by the
exchange agent by the election deadline, which is
5:00 p.m., New York time, on
February 15, 2006.
Once you tender your stock certificates to the exchange agent
you may not transfer your shares of TexasBanc common stock,
unless you revoke your election by written notice to the
exchange agent, which notice is received before the election
deadline.
If you fail to submit a properly completed form of election,
together with your stock certificates, before the election
deadline, you will be deemed not to have made an election. As a
no election holder, you will be paid approximately equivalent
value per share to the amount paid per share to the holders
making elections, but you may be paid all in cash, all in
Compass common stock, or in part cash and in part Compass common
stock, depending on the remaining cash and Compass common stock
available for paying the merger consideration after honoring the
cash elections and stock elections that other shareholders have
made.
If the merger is not completed for any reason or if a
shareholder revokes his or her election, any stock certificates
submitted before that time will be returned by the exchange
agent.
|
|
|
What Will Happen to Outstanding TexasBanc Options
(page 45) |
In accordance with the 2002 Stock Option Plan for TexasBanc
Holding Co., referred to in this proxy statement/ prospectus as
the “TexasBanc stock option plan”, TexasBanc presently
intends to accelerate the vesting of any unvested TexasBanc
stock options prior to the stockholders meeting such that the
holders of TexasBanc stock options will be able to exercise
those options and make an election with respect to the shares of
TexasBanc common stock that they receive. Holders of vested
TexasBanc stock options (including previously unvested options
which have been accelerated) can exercise those options at any
time until the closing, including under the “cashless”
exercise provisions of TexasBanc’s stock option plan,
subject to the actual completion of the merger. To the extent
that TexasBanc stock options have not been exercised before the
closing of the merger they will be cancelled, and holders of
unexercised options will have no further rights in those options.
4
|
|
|
Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
(page 38) |
The merger is intended to qualify as a reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, generally referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as the Code. It is a condition to the
closing of the merger that TexasBanc and Compass receive
opinions from their respective tax counsel, dated as of the
closing date of the merger, to the effect that the merger will
be treated as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code.
Assuming the merger qualifies as a reorganization, in general:
|
|
|
| |
• |
If you receive a combination of Compass common stock and cash in
exchange for your TexasBanc common stock, you generally will
recognize gain equal to the lesser of (1) the sum of the
cash and the fair market value of the Compass common stock you
receive, minus the tax basis of your TexasBanc common stock
surrendered and (2) the amount of cash you receive in the
merger. If your tax basis in the TexasBanc common stock
surrendered in the merger is greater than the sum of the cash
and the fair market value of the Compass common stock you
receive, your loss will not be currently allowed or recognized
for federal income tax purposes. |
| |
| |
• |
If you receive solely Compass common stock in exchange for your
TexasBanc common stock, then you generally will not recognize
any gain or loss, except with respect to cash you receive in
lieu of fractional shares of Compass common stock. |
| |
| |
• |
If you receive solely cash in exchange for your TexasBanc common
stock, then you generally will recognize gain or loss equal to
the difference between the amount of cash you receive and the
tax basis in your shares of TexasBanc common stock. |
You should read “The Merger — Material Federal
Income Tax Consequences of the Merger” beginning on
page 38 for a more complete discussion of the United States
federal income tax consequences of the merger. We urge you to
consult with your tax advisor for a full understanding of the
tax consequences of the merger to you.
|
|
|
Shareholder Approval of the 280G Payments
(page 72) |
Under the Code, certain payments that are contingent on a change
in the ownership or control of a corporation are treated as
“parachute payments.” The merger will result in
certain officers of TexasBanc being entitled to payments and
benefits that could be treated for federal tax purposes as
“parachute payments” under Section 280G of the
Code, generally referred to in this proxy statement/prospectus
as “280G Payments”. Both the payor of parachute
payments and the recipient of the payments can be subject to
unfavorable tax consequences. These unfavorable tax consequences
do not apply, however, to payments and benefits associated with
a change in ownership or control of a private corporation if the
corporation obtains shareholder approval of the payments and
benefits after disclosure of the material terms thereof;
provided that the right to receive the payments and benefits is
conditioned upon receipt of such shareholder approval. TexasBanc
is seeking shareholder approval of the executive benefits under
Section 280G of the Code so that the unfavorable tax
consequences would not apply.
|
|
|
TexasBanc Shareholder Vote Required to Approve the Merger
and 280G Payments (page 72) |
Approval of the agreement and
plan of merger requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the shares of
TexasBanc common stock outstanding as of the close of business
on
December 30, 2005, the record date for the special
meeting of TexasBanc shareholders. At the close of business on
the record date, there were 182,696 shares of TexasBanc
common stock outstanding held by 154 holders of record. Each
holder of record of TexasBanc common stock on the record date is
entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters to be
voted upon at the special meeting.
As of the record date, TexasBanc’s executive officers and
directors and their affiliates, as a group, beneficially owned
approximately 82% of the common stock of TexasBanc. Holders of
approximately 82% of the common stock of TexasBanc have agreed
to vote in favor of the agreement and
plan of merger by means of
an Amended and Restated Shareholder Voting Agreement, sometimes
referred to in this proxy statement/
5
prospectus as the Shareholder Voting Agreement, a copy of which
is attached as Appendix C to this proxy
statement/prospectus.
Approval of the 280G Payments requires the affirmative vote of
holders of more than 75% of the shares of TexasBanc capital
stock outstanding immediately before the time the merger is made
effective, excluding any shares held by the executive officers
whose compensation is being considered. Under the Shareholder
Voting Agreement, holders of approximately 82% of the common
stock of TexasBanc entitled to vote on the 280G Payments have
agreed to seek shareholder approval of the executive benefits.
|
|
|
Dissenters’ Rights (page 63) |
TexasBanc’s shareholders may elect to dissent from the
merger and receive the fair value of their shares of TexasBanc
common stock in cash by strictly following the procedures and
requirements set forth in Articles 5.11, 5.12 and 5.13 of
the Texas Business Corporation Act. In order to exercise
appraisal rights, you must refrain from voting “FOR”
the merger. For more information regarding your right to dissent
from the merger and the procedures and requirements to exercise
appraisal rights, please see “The Agreement and Plan of
Merger — Dissenters’ Rights,” beginning on
page 63. We also have attached Articles 5.11, 5.12 and
5.13 of the Texas Business Corporation Act as Appendix D to
this proxy statement/ prospectus.
|
|
|
Certain TexasBanc Directors and Executive Officers May
Have Interests in the Merger that are Different from, or in
Addition to, Their Interests as Shareholders
(page 44) |
You should be aware that certain of TexasBanc’s directors
and executive officers may have interests in the merger that are
different from, or in addition to, their interests as
shareholders of TexasBanc. TexasBanc’s board of directors
was aware of these interests and took them into account at the
time they approved the agreement and
plan of merger. These
interests include, among other things, employment agreements
entered into with TexasBanc’s executive officers that take
effect upon completion of the merger, the potential accelerated
vesting of stock options in connection with the merger, the
payments in respect of certain taxes owed on the exercise of
stock options, and certain change in control payments, including
a special bonus payment.
In addition, TexasBank, a Texas banking association with its
home office in Fort Worth, Texas and a wholly-owned
indirect subsidiary of TexasBanc, and Texas Bank, a Texas
banking association with its home office in Brownwood, Texas,
referred to in this proxy statement/ prospectus as
“Brownwood”, entered into a license agreement
providing Brownwood with the limited, exclusive right to use the
name
“TexasBank” and certain related trademarks of
TexasBank in a limited geographical area.
Bill Knight, Chairman
of the Board of TexasBanc, serves as a director of Brownwood,
and Mr. Knight, together with
Dorothy Doss, a director of
TexasBanc, beneficially own approximately 68% of the outstanding
common stock of Brownwood.
These interests are more fully described in this proxy
statement/ prospectus under the heading “Interests of
Certain Persons in the Merger” beginning on page 44.
|
|
|
TexasBanc Has Agreed When and How TexasBanc and its
Subsidiaries Can Consider Third-Party Acquisition Proposals
(page 60) |
TexasBanc has agreed that neither it nor its
subsidiaries will
solicit, initiate, knowingly encourage, knowingly take any
action to facilitate, or furnish or disclose nonpublic
information in furtherance of, any inquiries or the making of
any acquisition proposal, with a party other than Compass or
participate in any discussions or negotiations with, or provide
any information to, any person (other than Compass) concerning
any acquisition proposal, or enter into any definitive
agreement, arrangement or understanding for any acquisition
proposal while the merger is pending; however, TexasBanc may
furnish or disclose nonpublic information to any third party who
has made a written bona fide unsolicited acquisition proposal
and agrees to be subject to a confidentiality agreement, if
TexasBanc’s board of directors, after consultation with
(and based on the advice of) counsel, determines in good faith
that the failure to do so would result in a violation of its
fiduciary duties under applicable law and TexasBanc has provided
Compass with written notice of that determination and a copy of
any information furnished or disclosed to the third party.
6
Even if the TexasBanc board of directors resolves to change its
recommendations in favor of the agreement and
plan of merger,
TexasBanc must hold the special meeting of shareholders and,
unless the agreement and
plan of merger has been terminated,
TexasBanc’s shareholders who are parties to the Shareholder
Voting Agreement will be required to honor the Shareholder
Voting Agreement, under which they have agreed to vote the
shares of TexasBanc common stock held by them (aggregating
approximately 82% of TexasBanc’s outstanding shares) in
favor of the agreement and
plan of merger and against any
competing transaction.
|
|
|
Accounting Treatment (page 38) |
The combination of the two companies will be accounted for as an
acquisition of TexasBanc by Compass using the purchase method of
accounting.
|
|
|
The Completion of the Merger is Subject to Certain
Conditions (page 59) |
Completion of the merger is subject to various conditions,
including the approval of the agreement and
plan of merger by
TexasBanc’s shareholders, as well as receipt of all
required regulatory approvals without the imposition of a
condition that would reasonably be expected to have a material
adverse effect on
the company surviving the merger, the accuracy
of the other parties’ representations and performance of
their respective obligations and receipt of opinions of counsel
as to the tax treatment of the merger. There can be no assurance
as to whether or when all of the conditions will be satisfied
or, where permissible, waived.
|
|
|
We Have Not Yet Obtained All Regulatory Approvals
(page 41) |
We cannot complete the merger unless we receive the prior
approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, or Federal Reserve, or that approval is waived by the
Federal Reserve. Compass also must give notice of the merger to
the Texas Department of Banking. In addition, we need to make
filings with various other U.S. federal or state regulatory
or other authorities. Compass, TexasBanc and their relevant
subsidiaries have either filed or intend to complete the filing
promptly after the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus of
all required applications and notices with applicable regulatory
authorities in connection with the merger. There can be no
assurance that all requisite approvals will be obtained or that
such approvals will be received on a timely basis.
Compass and TexasBanc may agree in writing to terminate the
agreement and
plan of merger at any time without completing the
merger, even after TexasBanc’s shareholders approve the
agreement and
plan of merger. Either of Compass or TexasBanc may
also terminate the agreement and
plan of merger if:
|
|
|
| |
• |
the other party breaches any of its representations, warranties,
covenants or agreements, the breach would result in the failure
of the applicable merger condition and the terminating party is
not itself in material breach of the agreement and plan of
merger and that breach is not cured on 60 days notice; |
| |
| |
• |
the merger is not completed on or before June 1, 2006,
except that this right to terminate is not available to any
party whose failure to comply with the agreement and plan of
merger causes or results in the failure of the relevant
condition by that date; or |
| |
| |
• |
any governmental entity that must grant a required regulatory
approval has denied approval of the merger and such denial has
become final and nonappealable, except that this right to
terminate will not be available to any party whose failure to
comply with their obligations under the agreement and plan of
merger causes or results in that action. |
Compass may terminate the agreement and
plan of merger if
TexasBanc’s board of directors fails to recommend approval
of the agreement and
plan of merger or submits the agreement and
plan of merger to TexasBanc’s shareholders without a
recommendation for its approval or with special and materially
adverse conditions or withdraws or modifies or qualifies its
recommendation for approval of the agreement and
plan of merger
in a manner which is adverse to Compass, or if any of the
shareholders who are parties to the Shareholder Voting Agreement
breaches that agreement.
7
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Shareholder Voting Agreement
(page 65) |
Certain shareholders of TexasBanc who collectively own
approximately 82% of the outstanding TexasBanc’s common
stock have entered into an amended and restated shareholder
voting agreement with Compass, which is attached as
Appendix C to this proxy statement/ prospectus, in which
such shareholders agreed, among other things:
|
|
|
| |
• |
to vote all of the shares they hold, in favor of the agreement
and plan of merger at the special meeting; |
| |
| |
• |
not to sell or transfer their shares before the effective time
of the merger or the termination of the agreement and plan of
merger; and |
| |
| |
• |
not to solicit any competing transaction. |
|
|
|
The Rights of TexasBanc’s Shareholders After the
Merger Will be Different (page 86) |
|
|
|
Special Meeting of TexasBanc (page 23) |
TexasBanc plans to hold its special meeting of shareholders on
Thursday,
February 16, 2006, at 2:00 p.m., local time, at
The Fort Worth Club, located at 306 West
7
th Street
12
th Floor,
Fort Worth,
Texas 76102. At the meeting you will be asked
to approve the agreement and
plan of merger and the 280G
Payments.
You can vote at the special meeting if you owned TexasBanc
common stock at the close of business on
December 30, 2005.
As of that date, there were 182,696 shares of TexasBanc
common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. You can cast one
vote for each share of TexasBanc common stock that you own.
8
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
Compass
We are providing the following information to aid you in your
analysis of the financial aspects of the merger. The following
selected historical financial data is from Compass’ audited
financial statements as of and for each of the years ended
December 31, 2004,
2003,
2002,
2001 and
2000 and from
Compass’ unaudited quarterly financial statements as of and
for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and
2004,
which in the opinion of management includes all adjustments
necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the
unaudited periods. This information is only a summary and
contains certain ratios derived from these financial statements.
You should read it together with Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus.
See
“Where to Find More Information” on page 94.
Consolidated Statements of Income
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
September 30, | |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(In thousands except per share data) | |
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Interest and fees on loans
|
|
$ |
884,110 |
|
|
$ |
693,530 |
|
|
$ |
950,161 |
|
|
$ |
983,522 |
|
|
$ |
1,035,739 |
|
|
$ |
1,067,484 |
|
|
$ |
1,100,909 |
|
| |
Interest on investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
139,911 |
|
|
|
137,820 |
|
|
|
181,075 |
|
|
|
223,574 |
|
|
|
308,841 |
|
|
|
390,030 |
|
|
|
301,133 |
|
| |
Interest on investment securities held to maturity
|
|
|
91,805 |
|
|
|
107,780 |
|
|
|
141,024 |
|
|
|
69,217 |
|
|
|
41,025 |
|
|
|
57,784 |
|
|
|
105,314 |
|
| |
Interest on federal funds sold and securities purchased under
agreements to resell
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
6,145 |
|
| |
Interest on trading account assets
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
1,737 |
|
|
|
2,068 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
1,117,423 |
|
|
|
940,096 |
|
|
|
1,273,526 |
|
|
|
1,277,287 |
|
|
|
1,386,923 |
|
|
|
1,517,721 |
|
|
|
1,515,569 |
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Interest on deposits
|
|
|
177,193 |
|
|
|
116,058 |
|
|
|
159,778 |
|
|
|
174,752 |
|
|
|
248,221 |
|
|
|
417,188 |
|
|
|
543,342 |
|
| |
Interest on federal funds purchased and other short term
borrowings
|
|
|
95,808 |
|
|
|
36,246 |
|
|
|
58,930 |
|
|
|
31,091 |
|
|
|
39,885 |
|
|
|
107,112 |
|
|
|
100,505 |
|
| |
Interest on FHLB and other borrowings
|
|
|
129,268 |
|
|
|
132,583 |
|
|
|
169,493 |
|
|
|
192,314 |
|
|
|
197,108 |
|
|
|
170,930 |
|
|
|
153,210 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
402,269 |
|
|
|
284,887 |
|
|
|
388,201 |
|
|
|
398,157 |
|
|
|
485,214 |
|
|
|
695,230 |
|
|
|
797,057 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
715,154 |
|
|
|
655,209 |
|
|
|
885,325 |
|
|
|
879,130 |
|
|
|
901,709 |
|
|
|
822,491 |
|
|
|
718,512 |
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
82,268 |
|
|
|
78,140 |
|
|
|
105,658 |
|
|
|
119,681 |
|
|
|
136,331 |
|
|
|
106,241 |
|
|
|
65,578 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
632,886 |
|
|
|
577,069 |
|
|
|
779,667 |
|
|
|
759,449 |
|
|
|
765,378 |
|
|
|
716,250 |
|
|
|
652,934 |
|
9
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
September 30, | |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(In thousands except per share data) | |
|
Noninterest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
220,024 |
|
|
|
210,723 |
|
|
|
282,808 |
|
|
|
241,419 |
|
|
|
191,642 |
|
|
|
155,008 |
|
|
|
127,476 |
|
| |
Card and merchant processing fees
|
|
|
70,100 |
|
|
|
55,139 |
|
|
|
75,548 |
|
|
|
60,067 |
|
|
|
51,220 |
|
|
|
39,523 |
|
|
|
29,242 |
|
| |
Insurance commissions
|
|
|
45,182 |
|
|
|
39,180 |
|
|
|
51,437 |
|
|
|
44,024 |
|
|
|
21,452 |
|
|
|
4,110 |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Retail investment sales
|
|
|
25,977 |
|
|
|
24,151 |
|
|
|
31,316 |
|
|
|
27,440 |
|
|
|
26,105 |
|
|
|
23,397 |
|
|
|
18,474 |
|
| |
Asset management fees
|
|
|
21,093 |
|
|
|
16,898 |
|
|
|
22,666 |
|
|
|
21,994 |
|
|
|
20,149 |
|
|
|
20,614 |
|
|
|
20,117 |
|
| |
Corporate & correspondent investment sales
|
|
|
16,391 |
|
|
|
15,220 |
|
|
|
20,457 |
|
|
|
28,957 |
|
|
|
25,997 |
|
|
|
22,263 |
|
|
|
8,097 |
|
| |
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
12,852 |
|
|
|
12,427 |
|
|
|
17,169 |
|
|
|
16,928 |
|
|
|
18,839 |
|
|
|
18,564 |
|
|
|
8,356 |
|
| |
Trading gain (losses) and settlements on economic hedge swaps
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
15,067 |
|
|
|
11,053 |
|
|
|
9,320 |
|
|
|
71,006 |
|
|
|
9,657 |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Investment securities gains (losses), net
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
27,336 |
|
|
|
27,336 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
4,233 |
|
|
|
7,583 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
| |
Gain on sale of business
|
|
|
4,791 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Other
|
|
|
74,734 |
|
|
|
63,170 |
|
|
|
88,853 |
|
|
|
85,398 |
|
|
|
81,426 |
|
|
|
85,316 |
|
|
|
93,430 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
491,892 |
|
|
|
479,311 |
|
|
|
628,643 |
|
|
|
535,504 |
|
|
|
512,069 |
|
|
|
386,035 |
|
|
|
305,196 |
|
|
Noninterest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Salaries, benefits and commissions
|
|
|
363,085 |
|
|
|
340,528 |
|
|
|
458,356 |
|
|
|
429,486 |
|
|
|
391,056 |
|
|
|
346,275 |
|
|
|
304,921 |
|
| |
Equipment
|
|
|
61,277 |
|
|
|
56,602 |
|
|
|
76,169 |
|
|
|
72,302 |
|
|
|
65,429 |
|
|
|
60,137 |
|
|
|
52,812 |
|
| |
Net occupancy
|
|
|
50,521 |
|
|
|
49,623 |
|
|
|
65,791 |
|
|
|
61,607 |
|
|
|
57,137 |
|
|
|
53,294 |
|
|
|
46,199 |
|
| |
Professional services
|
|
|
44,388 |
|
|
|
40,154 |
|
|
|
57,380 |
|
|
|
56,518 |
|
|
|
53,146 |
|
|
|
46,095 |
|
|
|
37,799 |
|
| |
Marketing
|
|
|
33,866 |
|
|
|
28,885 |
|
|
|
33,249 |
|
|
|
31,946 |
|
|
|
28,290 |
|
|
|
19,634 |
|
|
|
13,231 |
|
| |
Communications
|
|
|
16,323 |
|
|
|
16,607 |
|
|
|
21,859 |
|
|
|
24,548 |
|
|
|
22,140 |
|
|
|
19,402 |
|
|
|
16,791 |
|
| |
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
4,656 |
|
|
|
4,871 |
|
|
|
6,543 |
|
|
|
7,302 |
|
|
|
9,175 |
|
|
|
24,709 |
|
|
|
23,802 |
|
| |
Merger and integration
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
1,853 |
|
|
|
2,842 |
|
|
|
7,131 |
|
|
|
8,896 |
|
| |
Loss on prepayment of FHLB advances
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
25,136 |
|
|
|
25,136 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Other
|
|
|
96,824 |
|
|
|
90,645 |
|
|
|
122,720 |
|
|
|
112,321 |
|
|
|
123,214 |
|
|
|
109,093 |
|
|
|
94,834 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
|
671,863 |
|
|
|
653,829 |
|
|
|
868,478 |
|
|
|
797,883 |
|
|
|
752,429 |
|
|
|
685,770 |
|
|
|
599,285 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Net income before income tax expense
|
|
|
452,915 |
|
|
|
402,551 |
|
|
|
539,832 |
|
|
|
497,070 |
|
|
|
525,018 |
|
|
|
416,515 |
|
|
|
358,845 |
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
153,223 |
|
|
|
134,595 |
|
|
|
179,647 |
|
|
|
168,392 |
|
|
|
180,673 |
|
|
|
142,183 |
|
|
|
117,222 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
299,692 |
|
|
$ |
267,956 |
|
|
$ |
360,185 |
|
|
$ |
328,678 |
|
|
$ |
344,345 |
|
|
$ |
274,332 |
|
|
$ |
241,623 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$ |
2.42 |
|
|
$ |
2.19 |
|
|
$ |
2.95 |
|
|
$ |
2.64 |
|
|
$ |
2.70 |
|
|
$ |
2.16 |
|
|
$ |
1.91 |
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
123,619 |
|
|
|
122,153 |
|
|
|
122,254 |
|
|
|
124,656 |
|
|
|
127,575 |
|
|
|
127,617 |
|
|
|
126,514 |
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$ |
2.37 |
|
|
$ |
2.14 |
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
2.58 |
|
|
$ |
2.65 |
|
|
$ |
2.14 |
|
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
126,487 |
|
|
|
125,218 |
|
|
|
125,416 |
|
|
|
127,186 |
|
|
|
129,850 |
|
|
|
129,138 |
|
|
|
127,261 |
|
|
Dividends per share
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
10
Consolidated Balance Sheets and Other Information
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
As of and for the Nine | |
|
|
| |
|
Months Ended September 30, | |
|
As of and for the Year Ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(In thousands except per share data) | |
|
Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Period end shares outstanding
|
|
|
124,510 |
|
|
|
122,774 |
|
|
|
123,264 |
|
|
|
122,086 |
|
|
|
126,116 |
|
|
|
126,801 |
|
|
|
127,779 |
|
| |
Weighted-average shares basic
|
|
|
123,619 |
|
|
|
122,153 |
|
|
|
122,254 |
|
|
|
124,656 |
|
|
|
127,575 |
|
|
|
127,617 |
|
|
|
126,514 |
|
| |
Dilutive effect of stock options
|
|
|
2,868 |
|
|
|
3,065 |
|
|
|
3,162 |
|
|
|
2,530 |
|
|
|
2,275 |
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
747 |
|
| |
Weighted-average shares diluted
|
|
|
126,487 |
|
|
|
125,218 |
|
|
|
125,416 |
|
|
|
127,186 |
|
|
|
129,850 |
|
|
|
129,138 |
|
|
|
127,261 |
|
| |
Book value per share (period end)
|
|
$ |
17.95 |
|
|
$ |
16.31 |
|
|
$ |
16.68 |
|
|
$ |
15.50 |
|
|
$ |
15.58 |
|
|
$ |
13.56 |
|
|
$ |
11.82 |
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Period End:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Loans
|
|
|
20,841,790 |
|
|
|
18,419,986 |
|
|
|
18,856,922 |
|
|
|
17,365,802 |
|
|
|
16,481,320 |
|
|
|
13,707,286 |
|
|
|
12,258,754 |
|
| |
|
Earning assets
|
|
|
27,776,619 |
|
|
|
25,639,403 |
|
|
|
26,090,878 |
|
|
|
24,764,119 |
|
|
|
21,772,650 |
|
|
|
21,019,047 |
|
|
|
18,949,369 |
|
| |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
30,133,835 |
|
|
|
27,783,239 |
|
|
|
28,181,916 |
|
|
|
26,963,113 |
|
|
|
23,925,589 |
|
|
|
23,015,000 |
|
|
|
20,877,160 |
|
| |
|
Non-interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
6,085,377 |
|
|
|
5,319,272 |
|
|
|
5,476,140 |
|
|
|
4,627,153 |
|
|
|
3,964,471 |
|
|
|
3,576,289 |
|
|
|
3,188,969 |
|
| |
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
12,748,849 |
|
|
|
11,174,340 |
|
|
|
11,566,592 |
|
|
|
11,060,479 |
|
|
|
11,163,082 |
|
|
|
10,159,925 |
|
|
|
11,636,408 |
|
| |
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
18,834,226 |
|
|
|
16,493,612 |
|
|
|
17,042,732 |
|
|
|
15,687,632 |
|
|
|
15,127,553 |
|
|
|
13,736,214 |
|
|
|
14,825,377 |
|
| |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
4,119,969 |
|
|
|
4,125,065 |
|
|
|
4,119,771 |
|
|
|
4,794,935 |
|
|
|
4,853,816 |
|
|
|
3,830,192 |
|
|
|
2,585,185 |
|
| |
|
Shareholder’s equity
|
|
|
2,234,577 |
|
|
|
2,002,791 |
|
|
|
2,056,345 |
|
|
|
1,842,574 |
|
|
|
1,965,383 |
|
|
|
1,719,576 |
|
|
|
1,510,004 |
|
| |
Average:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Loans
|
|
|
19,680,413 |
|
|
|
17,763,080 |
|
|
|
17,999,355 |
|
|
|
16,796,188 |
|
|
|
15,100,844 |
|
|
|
13,008,761 |
|
|
|
12,112,471 |
|
| |
|
Earning assets
|
|
|
26,833,306 |
|
|
|
25,330,605 |
|
|
|
25,482,185 |
|
|
|
23,054,327 |
|
|
|
21,403,835 |
|
|
|
20,089,964 |
|
|
|
18,189,409 |
|
| |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
29,138,273 |
|
|
|
27,490,389 |
|
|
|
27,660,628 |
|
|
|
25,142,719 |
|
|
|
23,354,327 |
|
|
|
21,992,587 |
|
|
|
19,800,819 |
|
| |
|
Non-interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
5,632,093 |
|
|
|
4,861,393 |
|
|
|
4,999,763 |
|
|
|
4,185,527 |
|
|
|
3,527,777 |
|
|
|
3,142,164 |
|
|
|
2,889,724 |
|
| |
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
12,524,665 |
|
|
|
11,330,685 |
|
|
|
11,413,939 |
|
|
|
10,806,323 |
|
|
|
10,612,323 |
|
|
|
10,618,857 |
|
|
|
11,414,876 |
|
| |
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
18,156,758 |
|
|
|
16,192,078 |
|
|
|
16,413,702 |
|
|
|
14,991,850 |
|
|
|
14,140,100 |
|
|
|
13,761,021 |
|
|
|
14,304,600 |
|
| |
|
Long-term debt and other borrowings
|
|
|
4,159,890 |
|
|
|
4,793,760 |
|
|
|
4,625,224 |
|
|
|
4,819,274 |
|
|
|
4,557,026 |
|
|
|
3,334,731 |
|
|
|
2,375,524 |
|
| |
|
Shareholder’s equity
|
|
|
2,152,890 |
|
|
|
1,944,971 |
|
|
|
1,968,948 |
|
|
|
1,965,710 |
|
|
|
1,910,148 |
|
|
|
1,661,779 |
|
|
|
1,353,387 |
|
|
Asset Quality:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
260,512 |
|
|
|
256,038 |
|
|
|
258,339 |
|
|
|
244,882 |
|
|
|
232,830 |
|
|
|
191,393 |
|
|
|
167,288 |
|
| |
Allowance for loan losses to period end loans
|
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
1.39 |
% |
|
|
1.37 |
% |
|
|
1.41 |
% |
|
|
1.41 |
% |
|
|
1.40 |
% |
|
|
1.36 |
% |
| |
Net loan charge-offs
|
|
|
67,906 |
|
|
|
66,393 |
|
|
|
91,610 |
|
|
|
104,267 |
|
|
|
94,894 |
|
|
|
81,086 |
|
|
|
57,061 |
|
| |
Net loan charge-offs to average loans
|
|
|
0.46 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
|
0.51 |
% |
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
0.63 |
% |
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
0.47 |
% |
| |
|
Nonperforming loans
|
|
|
50,968 |
|
|
|
48,498 |
|
|
|
50,681 |
|
|
|
66,088 |
|
|
|
81,709 |
|
|
|
65,797 |
|
|
|
86,252 |
|
| |
|
Other real estate
|
|
|
12,796 |
|
|
|
25,778 |
|
|
|
19,998 |
|
|
|
29,014 |
|
|
|
17,300 |
|
|
|
26,478 |
|
|
|
15,476 |
|
| |
Non-performing assets
|
|
|
63,764 |
|
|
|
74,276 |
|
|
|
70,679 |
|
|
|
95,102 |
|
|
|
99,009 |
|
|
|
92,275 |
|
|
|
101,728 |
|
| |
Total nonperforming loans to loans
|
|
|
0.24 |
% |
|
|
0.26 |
% |
|
|
0.27 |
% |
|
|
0.38 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
|
0.48 |
% |
|
|
0.70 |
% |
| |
Total nonperforming assets to loans and ORE
|
|
|
0.31 |
% |
|
|
0.40 |
% |
|
|
0.37 |
% |
|
|
0.55 |
% |
|
|
0.60 |
% |
|
|
0.67 |
% |
|
|
0.83 |
% |
11
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
As of and for the Nine | |
|
|
| |
|
Months Ended September 30, | |
|
As of and for the Year Ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(In thousands except per share data) | |
|
Consolidated Capital Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Tier I risk-based capital ratio
|
|
|
8.82 |
% |
|
|
9.06 |
% |
|
|
9.14 |
% |
|
|
9.19 |
% |
|
|
9.60 |
% |
|
|
8.27 |
% |
|
|
8.33 |
% |
| |
Total risk-based capital ratio
|
|
|
11.59 |
% |
|
|
11.14 |
% |
|
|
11.17 |
% |
|
|
11.62 |
% |
|
|
12.49 |
% |
|
|
10.94 |
% |
|
|
11.24 |
% |
| |
Leverage ratio
|
|
|
7.79 |
% |
|
|
7.42 |
% |
|
|
7.55 |
% |
|
|
7.33 |
% |
|
|
7.97 |
% |
|
|
6.71 |
% |
|
|
6.90 |
% |
| |
Average shareholder’s equity to average total assets
|
|
|
7.39 |
% |
|
|
7.08 |
% |
|
|
7.12 |
% |
|
|
7.82 |
% |
|
|
8.18 |
% |
|
|
7.56 |
% |
|
|
6.84 |
% |
|
Performance Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Return on average assets
|
|
|
1.38 |
% |
|
|
1.30 |
% |
|
|
1.30 |
% |
|
|
1.31 |
% |
|
|
1.47 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
1.22 |
% |
| |
Return on average equity
|
|
|
18.61 |
% |
|
|
18.40 |
% |
|
|
18.29 |
% |
|
|
16.72 |
% |
|
|
18.03 |
% |
|
|
16.51 |
% |
|
|
17.85 |
% |
| |
Net yield on average earning assets
|
|
|
3.57 |
% |
|
|
3.47 |
% |
|
|
3.49 |
% |
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
4.26 |
% |
|
|
4.13 |
% |
|
|
3.95 |
% |
| |
Dividend payout ratio
|
|
|
44.30 |
% |
|
|
43.81 |
% |
|
|
43.55 |
% |
|
|
43.41 |
% |
|
|
37.74 |
% |
|
|
42.99 |
% |
|
|
46.32 |
% |
TexasBanc
We are providing the following information to aid you in your
analysis of the financial aspects of the merger. The following
selected historical financial data is derived from
TexasBanc’s audited financial statements as of and for the
five years ended
December 31, 2004 and TexasBanc’s
unaudited quarterly financial statements as of and for the nine
months ended
September 30, 2005 and
2004. This information
is only a summary.
TexasBanc Holding Co.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
September 30, | |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
$ |
709.69 |
|
|
$ |
604.09 |
|
|
$ |
627.13 |
|
|
$ |
546.38 |
|
|
$ |
485.25 |
|
|
$ |
401.36 |
|
|
$ |
337.51 |
|
|
Dividends per share
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
Net income per share
|
|
$ |
88.26 |
|
|
$ |
60.65 |
|
|
$ |
85.86 |
|
|
$ |
67.92 |
|
|
$ |
65.60 |
|
|
$ |
59.31 |
|
|
$ |
48.39 |
|
12
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER AND THE SPECIAL
MEETING
About the Merger
|
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What am I voting on? |
| |
|
A: |
|
Compass and TexasBanc have entered into an agreement and plan of
merger by which Compass has agreed to acquire TexasBanc. You are
being asked to vote to approve the agreement and plan of merger
through which XYZ Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Compass, sometimes referred to as “Merger Sub.”
will merge with and into TexasBanc and subsequently TexasBanc
will merge with and into Compass. |
| |
|
|
|
Certain of you (generally all shareholders other than those who
have payments or benefits that are subject to the shareholder
vote) are also being asked to approve payments to certain
executive officers that may be deemed “parachute
payments” under Section 280G of the Code, referred to
as “280G Payments,” in order to satisfy the
shareholder approval exception provided under Section 280G
of the Code. |
| |
|
Q: |
|
What will I receive in exchange for my shares of TexasBanc
common stock? |
| |
|
A: |
|
If the merger is completed, you will receive, at your
election (but subject to proration and adjustment as
provided in the agreement and plan of merger), cash or shares of
Compass common stock, in either case, having a value equal to
$1,252.97 plus the product of 26.6987 multiplied by the average
closing price of Compass common stock for the ten trading days
immediately before completion of the merger, for each share of
TexasBanc common stock you hold immediately before the
completion date of the merger. These calculations of the merger
consideration assume that 2,264 shares of TexasBanc common
stock will be issued on exercise of outstanding TexasBanc stock
options. In no event will Compass issue more than
4,938,206 shares of Compass common stock or pay more than
$231.75 million in cash in merger consideration, including
if there are more than 2,264 shares of TexasBanc common
stock issued as a result of the exercise of TexasBanc stock
options, and the consideration payable to each shareholder will
be proportionately reduced if necessary to give effect to these
limits. As explained in more detail in “The Agreement and
Plan of Merger — Merger Consideration” beginning
on page 51, if you are a TexasBanc shareholder, whether you
make a cash election or a stock election, the value of the
consideration that you will receive upon completion of the
merger will be the same. |
| |
|
|
|
All cash elections and stock elections are subject to proration
and adjustment as described in “The Agreement and Plan of
Merger — Merger Consideration” beginning on
page 51 of this proxy statement/ prospectus. |
| |
|
Q: |
|
Will I be able to trade the Compass common stock that I
receive in the merger? |
| |
|
A: |
|
Yes. The Compass common stock issued in the merger will be
traded on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol
“CBSS.” You may sell the shares of Compass common
stock you receive in the merger without restriction unless,
under United States securities laws, you are considered an
“affiliate” of TexasBanc at the time of the special
meeting or become an “affiliate” of Compass as a
result of the merger. Affiliates will need to comply with the
restrictions described in the section titled “The
Merger — Restrictions on Resale by Affiliates”
beginning on page 62. |
| |
|
Q: |
|
What is the required vote to approve the agreement and
plan of merger and the 280G Payments? |
| |
|
A: |
|
The holders of two-thirds of the outstanding shares of TexasBanc
common stock as of December 30, 2005, the record date for
the special meeting, must vote to approve the agreement and plan
of merger in order for the merger to be completed. Abstentions
from voting and “broker non-votes” are not considered
affirmative votes and, therefore, will have the same practical
effect as a vote against the merger. Holders of approximately
82% of the outstanding TexasBanc common stock have agreed with
Compass to vote in favor of the agreement and plan of merger. |
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approval of the 280G Payments requires the affirmative vote of
more than 75% of the voting power of all outstanding shares of
TexasBanc capital stock, excluding those shares held or
constructively owned by the executive officers whose
compensation is being considered. |
| |
|
Q: |
|
Are Compass stockholders voting on the merger? |
| |
|
A: |
|
No vote of Compass stockholders is required to complete the
merger. |
| |
|
Q: |
|
What does the TexasBanc board of directors
recommend? |
| |
|
A: |
|
The board of directors of TexasBanc unanimously recommends that
TexasBanc’s shareholders vote “FOR” the agreement
and plan of merger. |
| |
|
|
|
The board of directors of TexasBanc (with Mr. Bryant
abstaining) unanimously recommends that TexasBanc’s
shareholders vote “FOR” the approval of the 280G
Payments. |
| |
|
Q: |
|
Do I have dissenters’ or appraisal rights with
respect to the merger? |
| |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Under Texas law, you have the right to dissent from the
merger. To exercise dissenters’ rights of appraisal, or
appraisal rights, you must strictly follow the procedures
prescribed by the Texas Business Corporation Act, or TBCA. To
review these procedures in more detail, see “The Agreement
and Plan of Merger — Dissenters’ Rights”
beginning on page 63 of this proxy statement/ prospectus
and Appendix D. |
| |
|
Q: |
|
May I submit a form of election if I vote against the
merger? |
| |
|
A: |
|
Yes. You may submit a form of election even if you vote against
the agreement and plan of merger. |
| |
|
Q: |
|
What if I do not submit a properly completed form of
election? |
| |
|
A: |
|
If you do not submit a properly completed form of election
before the election deadline, you will be deemed not to have
made an election. As a no election holder, you will be paid
approximately equivalent per share to the amount paid per share
to the holders making elections, but you may be paid in cash or
Compass common stock, or a mix of cash or Compass common stock
depending on the remaining cash and Compass common stock
available for paying the merger consideration after honoring the
cash elections and stock elections that other shareholders have
made. |
| |
|
Q: |
|
When do you expect the merger to occur? |
| |
|
A: |
|
We expect to complete the merger promptly after TexasBanc’s
shareholders approve the agreement and plan of merger at the
special meeting and after the receipt of all requisite
governmental and regulatory approvals, the expiration of
applicable waiting periods and the satisfaction or waiver of all
other conditions to the merger. We currently expect this to
occur in the first quarter of 2006. |
| |
|
Q: |
|
Are there any risks I should consider in deciding whether
I vote for the merger? |
| |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Set out under the heading of “Risk Factors,”
beginning on page 17 of this document, a number of risk
factors are listed that you should consider. |
About the Special Meeting
|
|
|
|
Q: |
|
When and where is the TexasBanc special shareholders
meeting? |
| |
|
A: |
|
The special meeting will be held at The Fort Worth Club,
located at 306 West
7th Street
12th Floor,
Fort Worth, Texas 76102 on Thursday, February 16,
2006, at 2:00 p.m., local time. |
| |
|
Q: |
|
Who is entitled to vote at the special meeting? |
| |
|
A: |
|
Holders of record of TexasBanc common stock at the close of
business on December 30, 2005, which is the date
TexasBanc’s board of directors has fixed as the record date
for the special meeting, are entitled to vote at the special
meeting. |
| |
|
Q: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
| |
|
A: |
|
Please mail your signed proxy card in the enclosed return
envelope, as soon as possible, so your shares will be
represented at the special meeting. In order to be sure that
your vote is counted, please vote now even if you plan to attend
the special meeting in person. |
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your proxy card will instruct the persons named on the proxy
card to vote your shares at the special meeting as you direct.
If you sign and send in your proxy card and do not indicate how
you want to vote, your proxy will be voted “FOR” the
approval of the agreement and plan of merger, and
“FOR” the approval of the 280G Payments. |
| |
|
Q: |
|
May I change my vote after I have mailed my signed proxy
card? |
| |
|
A: |
|
Yes. You may change your vote at any time before your proxy is
voted at the special meeting. You may change your vote by
submitting a new proxy with a later date or by voting in person
at the special meeting. Alternatively, you may revoke your proxy
altogether by notifying TexasBanc’s Secretary in writing
before the special meeting that you have revoked your proxy. |
| |
|
Q: |
|
Why is it important for me to vote? |
| |
|
A: |
|
We cannot complete the merger without the holders of two-thirds
of the outstanding shares of TexasBanc common stock as of the
record date voting in favor of the agreement and plan of merger.
If you do not vote or give instructions to your broker or
bank to vote on your behalf, it will have the same effect as a
vote against the merger. |
| |
|
Q: |
|
Should I send in my stock certificates with my proxy
card? |
| |
|
A: |
|
No. Please do not send your stock
certificates with your proxy card. At the time this proxy
statement/ prospectus is mailed, an exchange agent will mail or
deliver a form of election and transmittal materials. Before the
election deadline, which is 5:00 p.m., New York time, on
February 15, 2006, you should send your TexasBanc stock
certificates to the exchange agent, together with a completed,
signed election form provided to you. |
About Electing the Merger Consideration
|
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How do I elect the type of the merger consideration that I
prefer to receive? |
| |
|
A: |
|
Each TexasBanc shareholder is being sent an election form and
transmittal materials at the time this proxy statement/
prospectus is being mailed. You must properly complete and
deliver to the exchange agent the election materials, together
with your TexasBanc stock certificates. A return envelope will
be provided for submitting the election form and stock
certificates to the exchange agent. This is different from the
envelope that you will use to return your completed proxy card.
Please do not send your TexasBanc stock certificates or form
of election with your proxy card. |
| |
|
|
|
If your shares are held in a brokerage or other custodial
account, you should receive instructions from the entity where
your shares are held advising you of the procedures for making
your election and delivering your shares. If you do not receive
these instructions, you should contact the entity where your
shares are held. |
| |
|
|
|
If the merger is not completed, any TexasBanc stock certificates
that you previously sent to the exchange agent will be promptly
returned to you without charge. |
| |
|
Q: |
|
Can I make one election for some of my shares and another
election for the rest? |
| |
|
A: |
|
Yes. The election form permits you to specify, among the shares
you are submitting, how many you are allocating to: |
| |
|
|
|
• a stock election, |
| |
|
|
|
• a cash election, or |
| |
|
|
|
• no election. |
15
|
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What if I do not make an election? |
| |
|
A: |
|
If you do not submit a properly completed and signed election
form with your TexasBanc stock certificates to the exchange
agent by the election deadline (or if you submit a properly
completed election form indicating no election, together with
the certificates representing all of your shares), then the
consideration you will be entitled to receive in exchange for
each of your shares of TexasBanc common stock will be determined
by the proration and adjustment procedures described in
“The Agreement and Plan of Merger — Merger
Consideration” beginning on page 51 of this proxy
statement/ prospectus. |
| |
|
|
|
If you do not properly submit your election form with your
TexasBanc stock certificates by the election deadline, then,
promptly after the closing date of the merger, the exchange
agent will mail to you a letter of transmittal and instructions
for surrendering your TexasBanc stock certificates for use in
exchanging your TexasBanc stock certificates for the merger
consideration. |
| |
|
Q: |
|
Can I change my election after I submit an election
form? |
| |
|
A: |
|
Yes. You may revoke your election of merger consideration with
respect to all or a portion of your shares of TexasBanc common
stock by delivering written notice of your revocation to the
exchange agent by the election deadline. If you instruct a
broker to submit an election for your shares, you must follow
your broker’s directions for changing those instructions. |
| |
|
|
|
If an election is properly revoked with respect to shares of
TexasBanc common stock represented by stock certificates, the
certificates representing such shares will be promptly returned
upon written request of the holder who submitted them to the
exchange agent. |
| |
|
|
|
You will not be entitled to revoke or change your election or
sell your shares of TexasBanc common stock after the election
deadline. |
| |
|
Q: |
|
Will I receive any fractional shares of Compass common
stock as part of the merger consideration? |
| |
|
A: |
|
No. Compass will not issue fractional shares in the merger.
As a result, the total number of shares of Compass common stock
that you will receive in the merger will be rounded down to the
nearest whole number. You will receive a cash payment for the
value of any remaining fraction of a share of Compass common
stock that you would otherwise have been entitled to receive. |
| |
|
Q: |
|
Will the 280G Payments affect the amount of merger
consideration to be paid to TexasBanc shareholders? |
| |
|
A: |
|
No. TexasBanc shareholder action on this proposal, whether
for or against, will not change the value or number of shares of
Compass common stock or the amount of cash a TexasBanc
shareholder will receive if the merger is completed. |
How to Get More Information
|
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Who can help answer my questions? |
| |
|
A: |
|
If you have questions about the merger or about how to vote your
shares, please call Charles Cox at TexasBanc at
(817) 560-6481. |
| |
|
Q: |
|
Where can I find more information about Compass and
TexasBanc? |
| |
|
A: |
|
You can find more information about Compass and TexasBanc from
the various sources described under the heading “Where to
Find More Information” beginning on page 94 of this
proxy statement/ prospectus. |
16
RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information included or incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus, you should
carefully read and consider the following factors in evaluating
the proposals to be voted on at the special meeting and in
deciding whether to elect to receive cash or shares of Compass
common stock in the merger. Please also refer to the additional
risk factors identified in the periodic reports and other
documents of Compass incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/ prospectus and listed in “Information About
Compass — Incorporation of Documents by
Reference” on page 78 and “Where You Can Find
More Information” on page 94.
|
|
|
Because the market price of Compass common stock will
fluctuate, TexasBanc’s shareholders cannot be sure of the
value of the merger consideration they will receive. |
Upon completion of the merger, each share of TexasBanc common
stock will be converted into Compass common stock or cash in
accordance with the agreement and
plan of merger. The value of
the merger consideration to be received by TexasBanc’s
shareholders will be based in part on the average closing prices
of Compass common stock on the NASDAQ during the ten trading
days ending on the day before the completion of the merger. This
average price may vary from the closing price of Compass common
stock on the date we announced the merger, on the date that this
proxy statement/ prospectus is being mailed to TexasBanc’s
shareholders, and on the date of the special meeting of
TexasBanc’s shareholders. Any change in the market price of
Compass common stock before completion of the merger will affect
the value of the merger consideration that TexasBanc’s
shareholders will receive upon completion of the merger. The
price of Compass common stock may vary due to changes in the
business, operations or prospects of Compass, any future
issuances of debt or equity securities by Compass, market
assessments of the merger, general market and economic
conditions, regulatory considerations or other factors. Many of
these factors are beyond our control.
Accordingly, at the time of the special meeting,
TexasBanc’s shareholders will not know or be able to
calculate the amount of the cash consideration they would
receive or the exchange ratio used to determine the number of
any shares of Compass common stock they would receive upon
completion of the merger. The merger may not be completed until
a significant period of time has passed after the special
meeting. The price of Compass common stock may decrease before
the merger is completed.
A decrease in the price of Compass common stock would reduce the
amount of cash and value of Compass shares to be received with
respect to each share of TexasBanc common stock. See
“The
Agreement and Plan of Merger — Merger
Consideration” beginning on page 51 and the agreement
and
plan of merger attached to this document as Annex A for
more detailed information regarding the merger consideration.
Because the market price of Compass common stock may increase or
decrease before the completion of the merger, Compass urges you
to obtain current market quotations. Compass common stock is
traded on the NASDAQ National Market under the trading symbol
“CBSS.” No prediction can be made as to the market
prices of Compass common stock at any time before or after the
completion of the merger.
In no event will Compass issue more than 4,938,206 shares
of Compass common stock or pay more than $231.75 million in
cash in merger consideration, including if there are more than
2,264 shares issued as a result of the exercise of
TexasBanc stock options, and the consideration payable to each
shareholder will be proportionately reduced if necessary to give
effect to these limits. As of the date of this proxy statement/
prospectus, there were options to acquire 3,600 shares of
TexasBanc common stock. All of the TexasBanc stock options had
exercise prices below the value of the merger consideration as
of the date of this proxy statement. Because TexasBanc option
holders can pay the exercise price of their TexasBanc stock
options either in cash or by surrendering shares of TexasBanc
common stock, the exact number of shares to be issued as a
result of the exercise of TexasBanc stock options will not be
known until immediately before the closing of the merger.
17
|
|
|
We may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the
merger. |
The success of the merger will depend, in part, on our ability
to realize the anticipated cost savings from combining certain
aspects of the businesses of Compass and TexasBanc. However, to
realize the anticipated benefits from the merger, we must
successfully combine the businesses of Compass and TexasBanc in
a manner that permits those cost savings to be realized. The
anticipated benefits of the merger also depend on the continued
operating performance of TexasBanc’s businesses after the
merger. If we are not able to combine the businesses of Compass
and TexasBanc in a manner that permits the anticipated cost
savings to be realized, or if TexasBanc’s businesses do not
perform as anticipated after the merger, the anticipated
benefits of the merger may not be realized fully or at all or
may take longer to realize than expected.
Compass and TexasBanc have operated and, until the completion of
the merger, will continue to operate, independently. It is
possible that the integration process could result in the loss
of key employees, the disruption of each company’s ongoing
businesses or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures
and policies that adversely affect our ability to maintain
relationships with clients, customers, depositors and employees
or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger.
|
|
|
TexasBanc shareholders may receive a form of consideration
different from what they elect. |
Although each TexasBanc shareholder may elect to receive all
cash or all Compass common stock in the merger, the cash
available for all TexasBanc shareholders (including persons who
receive their shares as a result of the exercise of options) is
fixed at $231.75 million and the number of shares of
Compass common stock is fixed at 4,938,206 shares. As a
result, if either the aggregate cash or stock elections exceed
the maximum available, and you choose the consideration election
that exceeds the maximum available, you will receive a portion
of your consideration in cash and a portion of your
consideration in Compass common stock.
|
|
|
The opinion obtained by TexasBanc from its financial
advisor will not reflect subsequent changes. |
Sandler O’Neill, the financial advisor to TexasBanc, has
delivered a
“fairness opinion” to the board of
directors of TexasBanc. The opinion which is dated
September 17, 2005, states that, based upon and subject to
the assumptions and limitations on review set forth in the
opinion, the merger consideration to be paid to TexasBanc
shareholders is fair, from a financial point of view, to those
shareholders. The opinion does not reflect changes that may
occur or may have occurred after the date of this opinion,
including changes to the operations and prospects of Compass or
TexasBanc, changes in general market and economic conditions or
regulatory or other factors. Any such changes, or other factors
on which the opinion is based, may alter the relative value of
Compass and TexasBanc.
|
|
|
TexasBanc will be subject to business uncertainties and
contractual restrictions while the merger is pending. |
Uncertainty about the effect of the merger on employees and
customers may have an adverse effect on TexasBanc and
consequently on Compass. These uncertainties may impair
TexasBanc’s ability to attract, retain and motivate key
personnel until the merger is consummated, and could cause
customers and others that deal with TexasBanc to seek to change
existing business relationships with TexasBanc. Retention of
certain employees may be challenging while the merger is
pending, as certain employees may experience uncertainty about
their future roles with Compass. If key employees depart because
of issues relating to the uncertainty and difficulty of
integration or a desire not to remain with Compass,
Compass’ business after the merger could be harmed. In
addition, the agreement and
plan of merger restricts TexasBanc
from making certain acquisitions and taking other specified
actions until the merger occurs. These restrictions may prevent
TexasBanc from pursuing attractive business opportunities that
may arise before the completion of the merger. Please see the
section entitled
“The Agreement and Plan of
Merger — Conduct of TexasBanc Business Pending the
Merger” beginning on page 56 of this proxy statement/
prospectus for a description of the restrictive covenants to
which TexasBanc is subject.
18
|
|
|
Some of the directors and executive officers of TexasBanc
may have interests and arrangements that may have influenced
their decisions to support or recommend that you approve the
merger. |
The interests of some of the directors and executive officers of
TexasBanc may be different from those of TexasBanc’s
shareholders, and directors and officers of TexasBanc may be
participants in arrangements that are different from, or in
addition to, those of TexasBanc’s shareholders. These
interests are described in more detail in the section of this
proxy statement/ prospectus entitled “Interests of Certain
Persons in the Merger” beginning on page 44.
|
|
|
The agreement and plan of merger limits TexasBanc’s
ability to pursue alternatives to the merger. |
The agreement and
plan of merger contains provisions that limit
TexasBanc’s ability to discuss competing third-party
proposals to acquire all or a significant part of TexasBanc. See
“The Agreement and Plan of Merger — Conduct of
TexasBanc Business Pending the Merger” beginning on
page 56 of this proxy statement/ prospectus. These
provisions might discourage a potential competing acquirer that
might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of
TexasBanc from considering or proposing that acquisition even if
it were prepared to pay consideration with a higher per share
market price than that proposed in the merger, or might result
in a potential competing acquirer proposing to pay a lower per
share price to acquire TexasBanc than it might otherwise have
proposed to pay.
|
|
|
The shares of Compass common stock to be received by
TexasBanc’s shareholders as a result of the merger will
have different rights from the shares of TexasBanc common
stock. |
The rights associated with TexasBanc’s common stock are
different from the rights associated with Compass common stock.
See the section of this proxy statement/ prospectus entitled
“Comparison of Shareholders Rights” on page 86
for a discussion of the different rights associated with Compass
common stock.
|
|
|
If the merger is not completed by June 1, 2006,
either Compass or TexasBanc may choose not to proceed with the
merger. |
Either Compass or TexasBanc may terminate the agreement and plan
of merger if the merger has not been completed by
June 1,
2006, unless the failure of the merger to have been completed
has resulted from the failure of the party seeking to terminate
the agreement and
plan of merger to have performed its
obligations. See
“The Agreement and Plan of
Merger — Termination of the Agreement and Plan of
Merger,” beginning on page 61 of this proxy statement/
prospectus.
|
|
|
The merger may fail to qualify as a reorganization for
federal income tax purposes, resulting in your recognition of
taxable gain or loss in respect of your shares of TexasBanc
common stock and resulting in corporate tax liability for
Compass. |
Compass and TexasBanc intend the merger to qualify as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code, although the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, will not
provide a ruling on the matter. TexasBanc and Compass each will,
as a condition to closing, obtain an opinion from counsel that
the merger will constitute a reorganization for federal income
tax purposes. These opinions do not bind the IRS or prevent the
IRS from adopting a contrary position. If the merger fails to
qualify as a reorganization, the merger will be treated for tax
purposes as a taxable sale of TexasBanc’s assets to Compass
followed by a liquidation of TexasBanc, with Compass as
TexasBanc’s successor liable for the associated corporate
tax from the sale of assets. In such circumstances, you
generally would recognize gain or loss on each share of
TexasBanc common stock surrendered in an amount equal to the
difference between your adjusted tax basis in that share and the
sum of the amount of cash and the fair market value of the
Compass common stock received in exchange for that share in the
liquidation.
19
|
|
|
Regulatory approvals may not be received, may take longer
than expected or may impose conditions which are not presently
anticipated. |
The merger must be approved by the Federal Reserve (or that
approval must be waived) and the Texas Department of Insurance.
In addition, Compass must give notice of the merger to the Texas
Department of Banking. The Federal Reserve will consider, among
other factors, the competitive impact of the merger, the
financial and managerial resources of our companies and their
subsidiary banks and the convenience and needs of the
communities to be served. As part of that consideration, we
expect that the Federal Reserve will review capital position,
safety and soundness, and legal and regulatory compliance,
including compliance with anti-money laundering laws.
There can be no assurance as to whether this and other
regulatory approvals will be received, the timing of those
approvals, or whether any conditions will be imposed.
The agreement and
plan of merger permits Compass to make
acquisitions and dispositions and to issue capital stock in
connection therewith if such transactions do not present a
material risk that the completion of the merger will be
materially delayed or that any required regulatory approvals
will be materially more difficult to obtain.
|
|
|
TexasBanc’s shareholders will have less influence as
a shareholder of Compass than as a shareholder of
TexasBanc. |
You currently have the right to vote in the election of the
board of directors of TexasBanc and on other matters affecting
TexasBanc. The merger will transfer control of TexasBanc to
Compass. If the merger occurs, you will become a stockholder of
Compass with a percentage ownership of Compass that is much
smaller than your percentage ownership of TexasBanc. Because of
this, you will no longer be able to influence the management
policies of TexasBanc’s operations (to the extent you were
able to do so before the merger), and as a stockholder of
Compass with a small ownership percentage you will not be able
to influence the management policies of Compass.
|
|
|
Changes in the economy may negatively affect Compass’
business and stock price. |
General economic conditions impact the banking industry. The
credit quality of Compass’ loan portfolio reflects the
general economic conditions where it does business. The
continued financial success of Compass and its
subsidiaries
depends on things beyond Compass’ control, like national
and local economic conditions, the supply and demand for
investable funds, interest rates and federal, state and local
laws. Any deterioration in any of these conditions could have a
material adverse effect on Compass’ financial condition and
results of operations, which would probably negatively affect
the market price of Compass common stock. See
“Price Range
of Common Stock and Dividends” on page 75.
|
|
|
Unanticipated costs relating to the merger could reduce
Compass’ future earnings per share. |
Compass believes it has reasonably estimated the likely costs of
integrating the operations of TexasBanc into Compass and the
incremental costs of operating as a combined company. However,
it is possible that unexpected transaction costs such as taxes,
fees or professional expenses or unexpected future operating
expenses such as increased personnel costs or increased taxes,
as well as other types of unanticipated adverse developments,
could have a material adverse effect on the results of
operations and financial condition of Compass after the merger.
If unexpected costs are incurred, the merger could have a
significant dilutive effect on Compass’ earnings per share.
In other words, if the merger is completed and Compass incurs
unexpected costs and expenses as a result of the merger, Compass
believes that the earnings per share of Compass common stock
could be less than they would have been if the merger had not
been completed.
20
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This proxy statement/ prospectus and the filings made with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, that are
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus
contain or
incorporate by reference forward-looking statements
that have been made pursuant to the provisions of, and in
reliance on the safe harbor under, the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements
are not historical facts, but rather are based on current
expectations, estimates and projections. Words such as
“anticipates,” “expects,”
“intends,” “plans,” “believes,”
“seeks,” “could,” “should,”
“will,” “projects,” “estimates”
and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. These statements are not guarantees of future
performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other
factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to
predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from
those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements.
In that event, TexasBanc’s or Compass’ business,
financial condition or results of operations could be materially
adversely affected, and investors in TexasBanc’s or
Compass’ securities could lose part or all of their
investment. Additional factors that could cause Compass’
results to differ materially from those described in the
forward-looking statements can be found in Compass’ Annual
Report on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q and
Current Reports on
Form 8-K filed
with the SEC. You should not place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of
this proxy statement/ prospectus or, in the case of documents
incorporated by reference, the date referenced in those
documents. We are not obligated to update these statements or
publicly release the result of any revision to them to reflect
events or circumstances after the date of this proxy statement/
prospectus or, in the case of documents incorporated by
reference, the date referenced in those documents, or to reflect
the occurrence of unanticipated events.
You should understand that the following important factors, in
addition to those discussed elsewhere in this document and in
the documents which are
incorporated by reference, could affect
the future results of Compass and TexasBanc, and of the combined
company after the merger, and could cause those results or other
outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in our
forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
| |
• |
the businesses of Compass and TexasBanc may not be combined
successfully, or such combination may take longer, be more
difficult, time-consuming or costly to accomplish than expected,
in particular with respect to the integration of information
technology systems; |
| |
| |
• |
the expected growth opportunities and cost savings from the
merger may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize
than expected; |
| |
| |
• |
operating costs, customer losses and business disruption before
or after the merger, including adverse effects on relationships
with employees, may be greater than expected; |
| |
| |
• |
governmental approvals of the merger may not be obtained, or
adverse regulatory conditions may be imposed in connection with
governmental approvals of the merger; |
| |
| |
• |
the shareholders of TexasBanc may fail to approve the merger; |
| |
| |
• |
Compass’ and TexasBanc’s ability to successfully
execute their business plans and achieve their objectives; |
| |
| |
• |
changes in political and general economic conditions, including
the economic effects of terrorist attacks against the United
States and elsewhere and related events; |
| |
| |
• |
changes in financial market conditions, either nationally or
locally in areas in which Compass or TexasBanc conduct their
operations, including reduced rates of business formation and
growth, commercial real estate development and real estate
prices; |
| |
| |
• |
fluctuations in the equity and fixed-income markets; |
| |
| |
• |
changes in interest rates, the quality and composition of the
loan or securities portfolios, demand for loan products, deposit
flows and competition; |
| |
| |
• |
acquisitions and integration of acquired businesses; |
21
|
|
|
| |
• |
increases in the levels of losses, customer bankruptcies, claims
and assessments; |
| |
| |
• |
changes in fiscal, monetary, regulatory, trade and tax policies
and laws, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the
Federal Reserve; |
| |
| |
• |
continuing consolidation in the financial services industry; new
litigation or changes in existing litigation; |
| |
| |
• |
success in gaining regulatory approvals, when required; |
| |
| |
• |
changes in consumer spending and savings habits; |
| |
| |
• |
increased competitive challenges and expanding product and
pricing pressures among financial institutions; |
| |
| |
• |
demand for financial services in Compass’ or
TexasBanc’s market areas; |
| |
| |
• |
inflation and deflation; |
| |
| |
• |
technological changes and Compass’ and TexasBanc’s
implementation of new technologies; |
| |
| |
• |
Compass’ and TexasBanc’s abilities to develop and
maintain secure and reliable information technology systems; |
| |
| |
• |
legislation or regulatory changes, which adversely affect the
ability of Compass or TexasBanc to conduct the businesses in
which they are engaged; |
| |
| |
• |
Compass’ and TexasBanc’s ability to comply with
applicable laws and regulations; |
| |
| |
• |
and changes in accounting policies, procedures or guidelines as
may be required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or
regulatory agencies. |
22
SPECIAL MEETING
This section contains information from TexasBanc for
TexasBanc’s shareholders about the special meeting
TexasBanc has called to consider and approve (1) the
agreement and
plan of merger, as it may be amended from time to
time, and (2) the 280G Payments. We are mailing this proxy
statement/ prospectus to you, as a TexasBanc shareholder, on or
about
January 19, 2006. Together with this proxy statement/
prospectus, we are also sending to you a notice of the special
meeting and a form of proxy card that TexasBanc’s board of
directors is soliciting for use at the special meeting. The
special meeting will be held on Thursday,
February 16,
2006, at 2:00 p.m., local time, at The Fort Worth Club,
located at 306 West
7
th Street
12
th Floor,
Fort Worth,
Texas 76102.
This proxy statement/ prospectus is also being furnished by
Compass to TexasBanc’s shareholders as a prospectus in
connection with the issuance by Compass of shares of Compass
common stock upon completion of the merger.
Time and Place of Special Meeting
The special meeting of TexasBanc shareholders is to be held on
Thursday,
February 16, 2006, at 2:00 p.m., local time,
at The Fort Worth Club, located at 306 West
7
th Street
12
th Floor,
Fort Worth,
Texas 76102.
Matters to be Considered at the Special Meeting
The purpose of the special meeting is to consider and approve
(1) the agreement and
plan of merger, as it may be amended
from time to time, and (2) the 280G Payments. The merger
cannot occur unless the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding
shares of TexasBanc common stock as of the record date vote in
favor of the agreement and
plan of merger.
Record Date for the Special Meeting and Voting Rights
Only holders of record of TexasBanc’s common stock at the
close of business on the record date,
December 30, 2005,
are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting.
At the close of business on the record date, there were
182,696 shares of TexasBanc common stock outstanding held
by 154 holders of record. Each holder of record of
TexasBanc’s common stock on the record date will be
entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters to be
voted upon at the special meeting.
As of the record date, holders of approximately 82% of the
outstanding TexasBanc common stock have agreed with Compass to
vote in favor of the agreement and
plan of merger.
Required Votes
Proposal 1. Approval of the agreement and plan of
merger requires the affirmative vote of the holders of
two-thirds of the shares of TexasBanc common stock outstanding
as of the record date.
Proposal 2. Approval of the 280G Payments requires
the affirmative vote of more than 75% of the voting power of all
outstanding shares of TexasBanc capital stock, excluding those
shares held or constructively owned by the executive officers
whose compensation is being considered.
Quorum; Abstention and Broker Non-Votes
The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of TexasBanc common stock
entitled to vote at the special meeting is necessary to
constitute a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes (which are
signed proxies returned by a broker that indicate that the
broker has not received voting instructions from the beneficial
owner of the shares and does not have discretionary authority to
vote the shares) will be counted for purposes of determining
whether a quorum exists.
All properly completed and signed proxies delivered and not
properly revoked will be voted at the special meeting in the
manner specified in those proxies. If you do not specify a
choice, your shares represented by an
23
authorized proxy will be voted
“FOR” the approval of
the agreement and
plan of merger and
“FOR” the
approval of 280G Payments. The failure to submit a vote by proxy
or in person at the special meeting, abstentions and broker
non-votes will have the same effect as a vote
“AGAINST” each of the proposals presented.
Voting By Proxy
You may vote in person at the special meeting or by proxy. We
recommend you vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the
special meeting. You can change your vote at the special meeting.
You may vote by proxy by completing and mailing the enclosed
proxy card. If you properly submit your proxy in time to vote,
one of the individuals named as your proxy will vote your shares
of common stock as you have directed. You may vote for or
against the proposals submitted at the special meeting or you
may abstain from voting.
TEXASBANC’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS
THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE AGREEMENT AND PLAN
OF MERGER AND “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE 280G PAYMENTS
(WITH VERNON BRYANT ABSTAINING).
If you are a shareholder of record and you hold shares of
TexasBanc common stock in your name, you may vote by signing,
dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid
envelope provided.
If you hold shares of TexasBanc common stock through a broker or
other custodian, please follow the voting instructions that the
applicable institution provides to you. If you do not return
your proxy card those shares will not be voted at the special
meeting.
If you submit your proxy but do not make specific choices, your
proxy will be voted “FOR” each of the proposals
presented, and at the discretion of the proxy holders with
respect to any other business properly brought before the
meeting.
If you hold shares registered in your name and you wish to
change any proxy granted on the proxy card, you may revoke your
proxy before it is voted by:
|
|
|
| |
• |
submitting a new proxy with a later date; |
| |
| |
• |
notifying TexasBanc’s Secretary, Lisanne Davidson, 2525
Ridgmar Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas 76116, in writing
before the special meeting that you have revoked your
proxy; or |
| |
| |
• |
voting in person at the special meeting. |
Voting in Person. If you are a registered holder and plan
to attend the special meeting to vote in person, you will be
given a ballot at the special meeting.
People with Disabilities. TexasBanc can provide
reasonable assistance to help you participate in the special
meeting if you tell us about your disability and how you plan to
attend. Please call or write TexasBanc’s Secretary at least
ten days before the special meeting at the number or address
provided on the inside front cover page of this proxy statement/
prospectus.
Expenses of Proxy Solicitation. TexasBanc will assume the
cost of solicitation of proxies from you. In addition to
solicitation by mail, TexasBanc’s directors, officers and
employees may solicit proxies from shareholders by telephone,
facsimile or in person; however, they will not be paid any
additional compensation for such services.
24
DO NOT SEND IN ANY TEXASBANC STOCK CERTIFICATES WITH YOUR
PROXY CARD. At the time of the mailing of this proxy
statement/ prospectus you are also being mailed or delivered an
election form and other materials relating to your right to
elect the form of merger consideration under the agreement and
plan of merger and will be requested to send in your TexasBanc
stock certificates together with the properly completed election
form.
Other Business, Adjournment and Postponements
Under the TBCA and TexasBanc’s
Bylaws, only the business
that is specified in the
“Notice of Special Meeting of
Shareholders” may be presented at the special meeting, and
no other matters may properly be brought before the special
meeting.
Any adjournment or postponement may be made from time to time by
approval of the holders of common stock representing a majority
of the votes present in person or by proxy at the special
meeting, whether or not a quorum exists, without further notice
other than by an announcement made at the special meeting. If a
quorum is not present at the special meeting, TexasBanc’s
shareholders may be asked to vote on a proposal to adjourn or
postpone the special meeting to solicit additional proxies. If a
quorum is present at the special meeting, but there are not
sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve
the agreement and
plan of merger, TexasBanc’s shareholders
may also be asked to vote on a proposal to approve the
adjournment or postponement of the special meeting to permit
further solicitation of proxies.
25
PROPOSAL 1. APPROVAL OF THE AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF
MERGER — THE MERGER
The following description of the material information about
the merger and the description of the opinion of
TexasBanc’s financial advisor, is qualified in its entirety
by reference to the more detailed appendices to this proxy
statement/ prospectus. We urge you to read all of the appendices
to this proxy statement/ prospectus in their entirety.
General
TexasBanc’s board of directors has approved and adopted the
agreement and
plan of merger. The agreement and
plan of merger
provides for combining our companies through the merger of a
newly formed, wholly-owned subsidiary of Compass with and into
TexasBanc, and the subsequent merger of TexasBanc into Compass.
TexasBanc’s shareholders will be entitled to elect to
receive upon completion of the merger shares of Compass common
stock or cash, subject to potential proration and adjustment,
for each share of TexasBanc’s common stock. Shares of
Compass common stock issued and outstanding at the time the
merger is completed will remain outstanding and those stock
certificates will be unaffected by the merger. Compass’
common stock will continue to trade on the NASDAQ National
Market under the Compass Bancshares, Inc. name with the symbol
“CBSS” after the merger.
Please see
“The Agreement and Plan of Merger”
beginning on page 50 for additional and more detailed
information regarding the legal documents that govern the
merger, including information about the conditions to the merger
and the provisions for terminating or amending the agreement and
plan of merger.
Background of the Merger
During the last several years, there have been significant
developments in the banking and financial services industry.
These developments have included the increased emphasis and
dependence on automation, specialization of products and
services, increased competition from other financial
institutions and a trend toward consolidation and geographic
expansion, coupled with a relaxation of regulatory restrictions
on interstate conduct of business of financial institutions. As
short-term interest rates have risen since June 2004, financial
institutions have been experiencing compressing net interest
margins, while at the same time facing higher costs to attract
and maintain quality officers and employees. In addition, in
response to the attacks on
September 11, 2001, financial
institutions have been experiencing increased regulatory
oversight and potential liability for failure to comply with
legislative initiatives to prevent terrorism and money
laundering.
Mindful of these factors, the board of directors and management
of TexasBanc have periodically reviewed and updated strategic
plans for TexasBanc. As part of this ongoing process, TexasBanc
has historically received inquiries regarding its willingness to
consider an acquisition by, or affiliation with, larger
financial institutions. Consistent with its fiduciary
obligations to its shareholders, TexasBanc has considered such
inquiries and evaluated them with respect to the level and form
of consideration proposed, and the seriousness and specificity
that has been conveyed to TexasBanc in terms of consideration,
as well as the expected future operation of TexasBanc, and other
considerations and factors deemed relevant by TexasBanc, in
formulating its business plan with the intent to provide maximum
value to its shareholders.
As the nature of banking has become increasingly competitive,
larger organizations have demonstrated a willingness to pay for
a premium franchise in a high-growth market, such as
Fort Worth. In considering the market conditions, TexasBanc
felt it was appropriate to consult with investment banking firms
experienced in the area of financial institution mergers and
acquisitions to evaluate the prospects of potentially
accomplishing a transaction that would both maximize shareholder
value and continue to provide its customers with quality
products and services.
In the second quarter of 2005,
Bill Knight, TexasBanc’s
Chairman of the Board, began to consider seriously alternative
transactions to maximizing the value of TexasBanc’s
shareholders’ investment and concluded the most viable
alternative was to seek a merger partner for TexasBanc. In
April, 2005, after a number of informal discussions with members
of TexasBanc’s board of directors, Mr. Knight invited
26
representatives of
Sandler O’Neill & Partners,
L.P. to visit TexasBanc to discuss the role of Sandler
O’Neill as TexasBanc’s potential financial adviser
regarding the exploration of strategic options for TexasBanc,
including a possible sale or strategic business combination
involving TexasBanc.
After this meeting, TexasBanc briefly considered a business
combination with a financial institution that is smaller in size
than Texas Banc. On
May 19, 2005, Mr. Knight, Vernon
Bryant, TexasBanc’s President, and Buzz Brightbill, a
member of TexasBank’s board of directors, met with a
representative of
Sandler O’Neill to discuss this potential
business combination. A confidentiality agreement between
TexasBanc and that smaller institution was signed on
June 1, 2005. In the three weeks that followed,
representatives of TexasBanc and
Sandler O’Neill analyzed
the potential financial implications of such a combination and
discussed the potential combination with members of the other
institution’s management and its financial advisors.
Ultimately, TexasBanc decided that a combination with the other
financial institution would not maximize the value of Texas
Banc’s shareholders’ investment and was not in the
best interests of its shareholders.
On
June 30, 2005, Mr. Knight, Mr. Bryant, Charles
Cox, TexasBanc’s Treasurer, and representatives of
TexasBanc’s outside legal counsel, Jenkens &
Gilchrist, a Professional Corporation, met with representatives
of
Sandler O’Neill to discuss the process by which Sandler
would solicit indications of interest regarding a possible
business combination with TexasBanc.
Sandler O’Neill
presented a proposed timeline, a preliminary list of potential
interested parties, a financial summary of Texas commercial bank
acquisitions since
January 1, 2002, and a list of due
diligence items needed by
Sandler O’Neill to prepare
confidential information materials to be presented to potential
acquirers.
Sandler O’Neill also circulated an initial draft
of the confidential information memorandum to the persons
present at that meeting. Over the subsequent four weeks,
management of TexasBanc worked with
Sandler O’Neill to
revise the confidential information memorandum.
On
July 27, 2005, the TexasBanc board of directors met with
representatives of
Sandler O’Neill and Jenkens &
Gilchrist.
Sandler O’Neill made a presentation about the
merger market for Texas banks and how TexasBanc’s franchise
compared to other Texas banks.
Sandler O’Neill then
provided to TexasBanc’s board of directors its views on
comparable mergers and acquisitions of financial institutions
that had occurred and were occurring nationally and regionally,
presented its perspective on potential bidders, and discussed
the timing and mechanics of the proposed sale process along with
a preliminary timetable for a possible sale or business
combination involving TexasBanc. Thereafter, representatives
from Jenkens & Gilchrist discussed with
TexasBanc’s board of directors their responsibilities and
fiduciary duties in the context of a merger.
At that meeting, TexasBanc’s board of directors approved
resolutions engaging
Sandler O’Neill and Jenkens &
Gilchrist to commence the sale process. TexasBanc and Sandler
O’Neill signed an engagement letter later that day.
TexasBanc selected
Sandler O’Neill because of its
expertise, reputation and familiarity with TexasBanc and the
overall financial services industry and because its investment
banking professionals have substantial experience in
transactions comparable to the proposed merger.
Beginning
August 1, 2005,
Sandler O’Neill contacted 32
financial institutions and other strategic investors who were,
in
Sandler O’Neill’s view, potential acquirers of
TexasBanc. Of the parties contacted, 17 potential bidders
signed confidentiality agreements that limited the use of the
confidential information to an evaluation of a potential
transaction with TexasBanc. These agreements further stipulated
that a potential bidder neither attempt to acquire TexasBanc
without negotiating the acquisition with TexasBanc’s board
of directors nor solicit, hire, or divert any of
TexasBanc’s employees for a period of time after the date
thereof.
Upon receipt of a signed confidentiality agreement from a
potential acquirer,
Sandler O’Neill sent the
representatives of the interested party a confidential
information memorandum containing certain public and non-public
information regarding TexasBanc and instructions describing
TexasBanc’s process to determine that party’s level of
interest in acquiring TexasBanc. In those instructions,
potential acquirers were asked to submit a non-binding
indication of interest with respect to TexasBanc no later than
August 19, 2005.
Sandler O’Neill made clear to each
potential acquirer that: (1) TexasBanc was in the process
of exploring a number of alternatives to provide value to its
shareholders, one of which could be its sale; (2) if they
have an interest in pursuing such a transaction, they must
participate in this process; (3) TexasBanc was not bound or
obligated
27
to continue discussions, enter into any agreement or continue
the process; and (4) certain qualified bidders would be
permitted to perform due diligence on TexasBanc to determine
whether they wished to proceed in the process.
From
August 19, 2005 to
August 22, 2005, TexasBanc
received five bids from potential acquirors. On
August 22,
2005, representatives of TexasBanc’s management met with
Sandler O’Neill and Jenkens & Gilchrist to discuss
the bids received and to select potential bidders who would be
allowed to continue in the merger process. At that meeting,
Sandler O’Neill was instructed to contact the two potential
acquirers who submitted the most attractive offers (which
included Compass) to inform them that they would be permitted to
continue in the process.
Sandler O’Neill was also instructed to contact a third
potential acquirer, who had submitted a bid and indicated a
range of prices to be paid as consideration and also requested
an informal meeting with TexasBanc’s senior management
before proceeding further in the process.
Sandler O’Neill
was instructed to inform the bidder that TexasBanc senior
management would only meet with this third bidder, and the third
bidder would only be permitted to continue the process, if the
bidder confirmed that the consideration to be paid in the
transaction would fall in the uppermost portion of the
bidder’s range of proposed consideration. During their
discussion with
Sandler O’Neill, the third bidder’s
advisor confirmed that its client would seriously consider
proceeding with a bid in the uppermost portion of the proposed
range of prices. Representatives of the third bidder and
TexasBanc met on
August 25, 2005, to discuss the third
bidder’s continuing interest. On
August 29, 2005, a
representative of the third bidder contacted Mr. Bryant, to
inform him that, due to a change in circumstances unrelated to
TexasBanc, the third bidder did not wish to continue in the
process.
Sandler O’Neill was further instructed to contact a fourth
bidder and inform the bidder that it would only be permitted to
continue in the process if the bidder’s consideration to be
paid in the transaction could be substantially increased and
that the bidder would eliminate certain conditions outlined in
its bid that were not required by any of the other bidders.
Sandler O’Neill contacted the fourth bidder that same day,
and the bidder submitted a revised offer in which it did
increase its offer (although the revised offer was still less
than the two highest offers) and eliminated the non-standard
conditions. Subsequently, however, TexasBanc became concerned
that this bidder would not be able to meet TexasBanc’s
pricing expectations based on the two higher offers received and
that this bidder would not be able to complete a transaction
without raising a significant amount of additional capital, and
TexasBanc ceased negotiations with this bidder before it
conducted further due diligence.
On
August 28, 2005, TexasBanc opened an Internet-based data
room, containing much of the information that the two bidders
would require in connection with their due diligence.
Additionally, during the week of
August 29, 2005, the two
interested parties, including Compass, conducting due diligence
on TexasBanc at the offices of Jenkens & Gilchrist,
including management interviews and a review of TexasBanc credit
files.
On
September 6, 2005,
Sandler O’Neill sent the
remaining potential acquirers a letter requesting each to submit
to
Sandler O’Neill a final offer for TexasBanc. The letter
instructed each potential acquirer that the final bid should be
received by
September 9, 2005 and the bids should include
the following information: the final proposed amount of
consideration, describing the form of consideration; whether
further due diligence would be required, and if so, the extent
necessary; a description of how the bid would be financed; and a
description of the post-acquisition operations of TexasBanc,
including a commitment to assume and honor employee benefit
plans and agreements.
Sandler O’Neill also subsequently
requested that each remaining participant provide a proposed
form of any agreement by which they would acquire TexasBanc.
On
September 9, 2005, TexasBanc received bids from the two
interested parties, including Compass. On
September 13,
2005, TexasBanc’s board of directors held a special meeting
to analyze the two bids received. Mr. Knight gave
TexasBanc’s board a summary of the events that had
transpired over the past several weeks.
Sandler O’Neill
then discussed with TexasBanc’s board the two bids and the
process that had led to these bids. Jenkens & Gilchrist
then discussed the proposed form of agreement provided by
Compass. After discussion of the two bids, TexasBanc’s
board then agreed that
Sandler O’Neill would contact
Compass and
28
discuss the terms of the agreement provided by Compass. Sandler
O’Neill was authorized to tell Compass that if TexasBanc
believed that a satisfactory agreement could be reached,
TexasBanc would enter into a period of exclusivity with Compass.
During the week of
September 12, 2005, outside counsel for
TexasBanc and for Compass finalized the agreement and plan of
merger based on comments received from their respective clients.
Compass representatives spent an additional day conducting
confirmatory due diligence with TexasBanc’s outside public
accounting firm, and on
September 15, 2005, representatives
of
Sandler O’Neill and Jenkens & Gilchrist
conducted reverse due diligence of Compass.
TexasBanc’s management circulated to TexasBanc’s board
of directors a draft definitive agreement and
plan of merger on
September 17, 2005, and scheduled a special meeting of
TexasBanc’s board of directors later that day to review and
consider the proposed transaction. At that meeting, Sandler
O’Neill made a presentation concerning the merger
consideration to TexasBanc’s board. At the conclusion of
this discussion and after responding to questions from the
directors,
Sandler O’Neill rendered to TexasBanc’s
board its oral opinion that, subject to the assumptions,
limitations and qualifications set forth in their written
opinion, that the total aggregate consideration to be received
from Compass, which consisted of no more than
$231.75 million in cash and 4.938 million shares of
Compass common stock, including a cashless exercise of all
outstanding TexasBanc options, was fair to holders of TexasBanc
common stock from a financial point of view. Sandler
O’Neill’s oral opinion was subsequently confirmed by
delivery of its written opinion, dated as of
September 17,
2005, to TexasBanc’s board of directors. Thereafter, legal
counsel reviewed the terms and conditions of the proposed
agreement and
plan of merger and ancillary legal documents with
TexasBanc’s board of directors, discussing in detail the
business points, contingencies, timing issues and fiduciary
concerns. Outside legal counsel also described the terms and
conditions of the shareholder voting agreement that Compass
asked to be signed by Mr. Knight and Mrs. Dorothy
Doss, a director of TexasBanc, in their personal and
representative capacities for certain entities that own a
majority of TexasBanc stock. After asking a number of questions
of
Sandler O’Neill and outside counsel regarding the
proposed transaction and discussing the transaction among
TexasBanc’s board of directors, the board of directors
unanimously adopted resolutions which, among other things,
approved the proposed definitive agreement and
plan of merger
with Compass and the shareholder voting agreement, authorized
Mr. Knight or Mr. Bryant to execute the agreement and
plan of merger on behalf of TexasBanc, authorized TexasBanc to
prepare and file all necessary regulatory applications and
called a meeting of TexasBanc’s shareholders to consider
and vote on the agreement.
That evening, signature pages to the agreement and plan of
merger, the shareholder voting agreement and related documents
were exchanged by the parties. The companies issued a joint
press release announcing the signing of the agreement and plan
of merger, before the opening of the stock markets on the
morning of
September 19, 2005.
Recommendation of TexasBanc’s Board and Its Reasons for
the Merger
TexasBanc’s board of directors has unanimously approved
the agreement and plan of merger and unanimously recommends that
TexasBanc shareholders vote “FOR” approval of the
agreement and plan of merger.
TexasBanc’s board of directors has determined that the
merger is fair to, and in the best interests of,
TexasBanc’s shareholders. In approving the agreement and
plan of merger, TexasBanc’s board consulted with Sandler
O’Neill with respect to the financial aspects and fairness
of the merger consideration, from a financial point of view, to
the holders of TexasBanc common stock and with its outside legal
counsel as to its legal duties and the terms of the agreement
and
plan of merger. In arriving at its determination,
TexasBanc’s board also considered a number of factors,
including the following:
|
|
|
| |
• |
TexasBanc’s board of directors’ familiarity with and
review of information concerning the business, results of
operations, financial condition, competitive position and future
prospects of TexasBanc; |
| |
| |
• |
the current and prospective environment in which TexasBanc
operates, including national, regional and local economic
conditions, the competitive environment for banks, thrifts and
other financial institu- |
29
|
|
|
| |
|
tions generally and the increased regulatory burdens on
financial institutions generally and the trend toward
consolidation in the banking industry and in the financial
services industry; |
| |
| |
• |
the financial presentation of Sandler O’Neill and the
opinion of Sandler O’Neill dated as of September 17,
2005, that, as of September 17, 2005 (the date on which
TexasBanc’s board of directors approved the agreement and
plan of merger), and subject to the assumptions, limitations and
qualifications set forth in the opinion, the total aggregate
consideration to be received from Compass, which consisted of no
more than $231.75 million in cash and 4.938 million
shares of Compass common stock, including a cashless exercise of
all outstanding TexasBanc options, is fair, from a financial
point of view, to the holders of TexasBanc common stock (see
“— Opinion of TexasBanc’s Financial
Adviser,” beginning on page 31); |
| |
| |
• |
that shareholders of TexasBanc will receive part of the merger
consideration in shares of Compass common stock, which is
publicly traded on the NASDAQ, contrasted to the absence of a
public market for TexasBanc common stock; |
| |
| |
• |
the treatment of the merger as a tax-free exchange for federal
income tax purposes with respect to the TexasBanc common shares
exchanged for Compass common shares; |
| |
| |
• |
the results that could be expected to be obtained by TexasBanc
if it continued to operate independently, and the likely
benefits to shareholders of such course, as compared with the
value of the merger consideration being offered by Compass; |
| |
| |
• |
the ability of Compass to pay the aggregate merger consideration
without a financing contingency and without the need to obtain
financing to close the transaction; |
| |
| |
• |
the ability of Compass to receive the requisite regulatory
approvals in a timely manner; |
| |
| |
• |
the process conducted by Sandler O’Neill to identify
potential acquirers of TexasBanc and to assist TexasBanc’s
board of directors in determining that it was the appropriate
time to sell TexasBanc and in obtaining the highest value
reasonably available to shareholders of TexasBanc at the time
and under the circumstances; |
| |
| |
• |
that holders of approximately 82% of the shares of TexasBanc
common stock had indicated their willingness to sign the
shareholder voting agreement, whereby they would agree to vote
the shares of TexasBanc common stock beneficially owned by them
in favor of the agreement and plan of merger; |
| |
| |
• |
the terms and conditions of the agreement and plan of merger,
including the parties’ respective representations,
warranties, covenants and other agreements, the conditions to
closing, a provision which permits TexasBanc’s board of
directors, in the exercise of its fiduciary duties, under
certain conditions, to furnish information to, a third party
which has submitted an unsolicited proposal to acquire TexasBanc; |
| |
| |
• |
merger with a larger holding company would provide the
opportunity to realize economies of scale, increase efficiencies
of operations, and enhance the development of new products and
services; |
| |
| |
• |
the effects of the merger on TexasBanc’s employees; |
| |
| |
• |
the agreement of Compass to use its commercially reasonable
efforts to maintain directors’ and officers’ liability
insurance, to continue to provide indemnification for
TexasBanc’s directors and officers, and to honor existing
employee benefits; |
| |
| |
• |
that some of TexasBanc’s directors and executive officers
have other financial interests in the merger that are in
addition to their interests as TexasBanc shareholders, including
as a result of employment and compensation arrangements with
TexasBanc and the manner in which they would be affected by the
merger, as well as the new employment agreements that certain of
these persons entered into with Compass in connection with the
merger; |
| |
| |
• |
that the cash portion of the merger consideration will be
taxable to TexasBanc’s shareholders upon completion of the
merger; |
30
|
|
|
| |
• |
the requirement that TexasBanc conduct its business in the
ordinary course and the other restrictions on the conduct of the
TexasBanc’s business before completion of the merger, which
may delay or prevent TexasBanc from undertaking business
opportunities that may arise pending completion of the merger; |
| |
| |
• |
that the agreement and plan of merger would prohibit TexasBanc
from paying dividends on the TexasBanc common stock between the
date of the agreement and plan of merger and completion of the
merger; and |
| |
| |
• |
that under the agreement and plan of merger TexasBanc could not
solicit competing proposals for the acquisition of TexasBanc. |
The reasons set out above for the merger are not intended to be
exhaustive but include all material factors considered by
TexasBanc’s board of directors in approving the merger. In
reaching its determination, the TexasBanc board of directors did
not assign any relative or specific weights to different
factors, and individual directors may have given different
weights to different factors. Based on the reasons stated, the
board felt that the merger was in the best interest of
TexasBanc’s shareholders, and therefore the board of
directors of TexasBanc unanimously approved the merger. In
addition, certain members of the TexasBanc board of directors
have agreed to vote the stock of TexasBanc over which they have
voting authority in favor of the agreement and
plan of merger
and the merger.
Opinion of TexasBanc’s Financial Advisor
By letter agreement dated
July 27, 2005, TexasBanc engaged
Sandler O’Neill to provide financial advisory services to
the TexasBanc board of directors in connection with the
consideration of a possible business combination involving
TexasBanc and a third party.
Sandler O’Neill is a
nationally recognized investment banking firm whose principal
business specialty is financial institutions. In the ordinary
course of its investment banking business,
Sandler O’Neill
is regularly engaged in the valuation of financial institutions
and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions
and other corporate transactions.
Sandler O’Neill acted as financial advisor to TexasBanc in
connection with the proposed merger and participated in certain
of the negotiations leading to the agreement and
plan of merger.
At the
September 17, 2005 meeting at which the TexasBanc
board considered and approved the agreement and
plan of merger,
Sandler O’Neill delivered to the board its oral opinion,
subsequently confirmed in writing that, as of such date, the
merger consideration was fair to TexasBanc shareholders from a
financial point of view.
The full text of Sandler
O’Neill’s opinion is attached as Appendix A to
this proxy statement/ prospectus. The opinion outlines the
procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and
qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by
Sandler O’Neill in rendering its opinion. The description
of the opinion set forth below is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the opinion. We urge TexasBanc shareholders to read
the entire opinion carefully in connection with their
consideration of the proposed merger.
Sandler O’Neill’s opinion speaks only as of the
date of the opinion. The opinion was directed to the TexasBanc
board and is directed only to the fairness of the merger
consideration to TexasBanc’s shareholders from a financial
point of view. It does not address the underlying business
decision of TexasBanc to engage in the merger or any other
aspect of the merger and is not a recommendation to any
TexasBanc shareholder as to how the shareholder should vote at
the special meeting with respect to the merger or any other
matter or the form of consideration the shareholder should elect
in the merger.
In connection with rendering its opinion,
Sandler O’Neill
reviewed and considered, among other things:
|
|
| |
(1) the agreement and plan of merger; |
| |
| |
(2) certain financial statements and other historical
financial information of TexasBanc that Sandler O’Neill
deemed relevant and was provided by the management of TexasBanc; |
| |
| |
(3) certain publicly available financial statements and
other historical financial information of Compass that Sandler
O’Neill deemed relevant; |
31
|
|
| |
(4) internal financial projections for TexasBanc for the
years ending December 31, 2005 and 2006 and reviewed with
senior management of TexasBanc; |
| |
| |
(5) consensus earnings per share estimates for Compass for
the years ending December 31, 2005 and 2006 published by
I/B/E/S and reviewed with the senior management of Compass; |
| |
| |
(6) the pro forma financial impact of the merger on
Compass, based on assumptions relating to transaction expenses,
purchase accounting adjustments and cost savings determined by
the senior management of Compass and TexasBanc; |
| |
| |
(7) the publicly reported historical price and trading
activity for the Compass common stock, including a comparison of
certain financial and stock market information for Compass with
similar publicly available information for certain other
publicly traded companies that Sandler O’Neill deemed
relevant; |
| |
| |
(8) the financial terms of certain recent business
combinations in the commercial banking industry, to the extent
publicly available; |
| |
| |
(9) the relative pro forma ownership of the shareholders of
TexasBanc and Compass in the combined company; |
| |
| |
(10) the current market environment generally and the
banking environment in particular; and |
| |
| |
(11) such other information, financial studies, analyses
and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria
as Sandler O’Neill considered relevant. |
Sandler O’Neill also discussed with certain members of
TexasBanc’s senior management their views of the business,
financial condition, results of operations and prospects of
TexasBanc,
Sandler O’Neill discussed similar matters with
certain members of senior management of Compass regarding the
business, financial condition, results of operations and
prospects of Compass.
In performing its reviews and analyses and in rendering its
opinion,
Sandler O’Neill assumed and relied upon the
accuracy and completeness of all the financial information and
other information that was available from public sources, that
was provided to it by TexasBanc or Compass or their respective
representatives or that was otherwise reviewed by it, and
further relied on the assurances of senior management of
TexasBanc and Compass that they were not aware of any facts or
circumstances that would make such information inaccurate or
misleading.
Sandler O’Neill was not asked to and did not
independently verify any such information and it did not assume
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy or completeness
thereof.
Sandler O’Neill did not make an independent
evaluation or appraisal of the specific assets, the collateral
securing assets or the liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of
TexasBanc or Compass or any of their respective
subsidiaries, or
the ability to collect on any such assets, nor was it furnished
with any such evaluations or appraisals.
Sandler O’Neill is
not an expert in the evaluation of allowances for loan losses,
and it did not make an independent evaluation of the adequacy of
the allowance for loan losses of TexasBanc or Compass, nor did
it review any individual credit files relating to TexasBanc or
Compass. With TexasBanc’s consent,
Sandler O’Neill
assumed that the respective allowances for loan losses for both
TexasBanc and Compass were adequate to cover such losses and
will be adequate on a pro forma basis for the combined entity.
Sandler O’Neill also assumed that there has been no
material change in the assets, financial condition, results of
operations, business or prospects of TexasBanc or Compass since
the date of the most recent financial statements made available.
In addition,
Sandler O’Neill did not conduct any physical
inspection of the properties or facilities of TexasBanc or
Compass.
Sandler O’Neill assumed, in all respects material to its
analysis, that TexasBanc and Compass will remain as going
concerns for all periods relevant to its analyses, that all of
the representations and warranties contained in the agreement
and
plan of merger and all related agreements were true and
correct, that each party to such agreements will perform all of
the covenants required to be performed by it under such
agreements, that the conditions precedent in such agreements are
not waived and that the merger will qualify as a tax-free
reorganization for federal income tax purposes with respect to
the Compass common stock to be issued in the merger. With
TexasBanc’s consent,
Sandler O’Neill relied upon the
advice TexasBanc received
32
from its legal, accounting and tax advisors as to all legal,
accounting and tax matters relating to the merger and the other
transactions contemplated by the agreement and
plan of merger.
Sandler O’Neill’s opinion was necessarily based on
financial, economic, market and other conditions as they existed
on, and could be evaluated as of, the date of its opinion.
Events occurring after the date of the opinion could materially
affect the opinion.
Sandler O’Neill has not undertaken to
update, revise, reaffirm or withdraw its opinion or otherwise
comment upon events occurring after the date thereof. Sandler
O’Neill expressed no opinion as to the value of the Compass
common stock when issued to TexasBanc’s shareholders or the
prices at which the Compass common stock may trade at any time.
In rendering its opinion,
Sandler O’Neill performed a
variety of financial analyses. The following is a summary of the
material analyses performed by
Sandler O’Neill, but is not
a complete description of all the analyses underlying Sandler
O’Neill’s opinion. The summary includes information
presented in tabular format.
In order to fully understand the
financial analyses, these tables must be read together with the
accompanying text. The tables alone do not constitute a complete
description of the financial analyses. The preparation of a
fairness opinion is a complex process involving subjective
judgments as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of
financial analysis and the application of those methods to the
particular circumstances. The process, therefore, is not
necessarily susceptible to a partial analysis or summary
description.
Sandler O’Neill believes that its analyses
must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of the
factors and analyses considered without considering all factors
and analyses, or attempting to ascribe relative weights to some
or all such factors and analyses, could create an incomplete
view of the evaluation process underlying its opinion. Also, no
company included in
Sandler O’Neill’s comparative
analyses described below is identical to TexasBanc or Compass
and no transaction is identical to the merger. Accordingly, an
analysis of comparable companies or transactions involves
complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in
financial and operating characteristics of the companies and
other factors that could affect the public trading values or
merger transaction values, as the case may be, of TexasBanc or
Compass and the companies to which they are being compared.
The earnings projections used and relied upon by Sandler
O’Neill for TexasBanc in its analyses were based upon
internal financial projections for TexasBanc prepared by and
reviewed with the management of TexasBanc. The earnings
projections for Compass were those published by I/B/E/S and were
reviewed with the Compass management team. With respect to
TexasBanc’s financial projections and all projections of
transaction costs, purchase accounting adjustments and expected
cost savings relating to the merger, management of the
respective institutions confirmed to
Sandler O’Neill that
they reflected the best currently available estimates and
judgments of management and
Sandler O’Neill assumed for
purposes of its analyses that such performances would be
achieved.
Sandler O’Neill expressed no opinion as to such
financial projections or the assumptions on which they were
based. The financial projections and estimates provided by
management of TexasBanc were prepared for internal purposes only
and not with a view towards public disclosure. These
projections, as well as the other estimates used by Sandler
O’Neill in its analyses, were based on numerous variables
and assumptions that are inherently uncertain, and, accordingly,
actual results could vary materially from those set forth in
such projections.
In performing its analyses,
Sandler O’Neill also made
numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance,
business and economic conditions and various other matters, many
of which cannot be predicted and are beyond the control of
TexasBanc, Compass and
Sandler O’Neill. The analyses
performed by
Sandler O’Neill are not necessarily indicative
of actual values or future results, which may be significantly
more or less favorable than suggested by such analyses. Sandler
O’Neill prepared its analyses solely for purposes of
rendering its opinion and provided such analyses to the
TexasBanc board at the board’s
September 17, 2005
meeting. Estimates on the values of companies do not purport to
be appraisals or necessarily reflect the prices at which
companies or their securities may actually be sold. Such
estimates are inherently subject to uncertainty and actual
values may be materially different. Accordingly, Sandler
O’Neill’s analyses do not necessarily reflect the
value of the Compass common stock or the price at which the
Compass common stock may be sold at any time.
33
Summary of Proposal. Sandler O’Neill reviewed the
financial terms of the proposed transaction. Based upon the
total consideration equal to $231.75 million in cash and
4.938 million shares of Compass common stock and upon
182,696 shares of TexasBanc common stock outstanding as of
June 30, 2005 and 3,600 options outstanding with a weighted
average strike price of $651.61 per option and the
10-day average for the
closing stock price of Compass common stock of $46.93 on that
date,
Sandler O’Neill calculated a per share transaction
value of $2,505.94 (excluding merger expenses and capitalized
transaction costs).
Based upon TexasBanc’s financial information as of and for
the period ending
June 30, 2005,
Sandler O’Neill
calculated the following ratios:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Transaction Ratios | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Compass/ | |
|
Texas | |
|
Nationwide | |
| |
|
TexasBanc | |
|
Transactions(1) | |
|
Transactions(2) | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Transaction price/ LTM EPS
|
|
|
23.5 |
x |
|
|
28.8 |
x |
|
|
22.6 |
x |
|
Transaction price/ Book value(3)
|
|
|
366.1 |
% |
|
|
314.9 |
% |
|
|
223.5 |
% |
|
Transaction price/ Tangible book value(3)
|
|
|
384.0 |
% |
|
|
323.4 |
% |
|
|
311.3 |
% |
|
Tangible book premium/ Core deposits(4)
|
|
|
30.2 |
% |
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
|
| (1) |
Represents the median transaction ratios for Texas commercial
bank transactions greater than $25 million since
January 1, 2004. |
| |
| (2) |
Represents the median transaction ratios for nationwide
commercial bank transactions greater than $300 million and
less than $600 million since January 1, 2004. |
| |
| (3) |
Reflects TexasBanc stated book value and tangible book value of
$684.45 and $652.55 per share, respectively. |
| |
| (4) |
Core deposits defined as total deposits less jumbo and brokered
certificates of deposit. |
Stock Trading History. Sandler O’Neill reviewed the
reported closing per share market prices and volume of the
Compass common stock for the one-year and three-year periods
ended
September 16, 2005 and the relationship between the
movements in the closing prices of the Compass common stock
during those periods to movements in certain stock indices,
including the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index,
Standard & Poor’s Bank Index, and the NASDAQ Bank
Index, and to the weighted average (by market capitalization)
performance of a peer group of publicly-traded commercial banks
selected by
Sandler O’Neill. The institutions included
in the peer group are identified in the section
“Comparable
Company Analysis” below.
During the one-year period ended
September 16, 2005, the
Compass common stock outperformed the Standard &
Poor’s Bank Index, the NASDAQ Bank Index, and the peer
group to which it was compared while it generally underperformed
the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. Over the
three-year period ended
September 16, 2005, the Compass
common stock generally outperformed the indices and peer group
to which it was compared.
|
|
|
Compass Stock Performance |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Beginning Index Value | |
|
Ending Index Value | |
| |
|
September 15, 2004 | |
|
September 16, 2005 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Compass
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
104.0 |
|
|
Compass Peer Group
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
102.7 |
|
|
NASDAQ Bank Index
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
102.1 |
|
|
S&P Bank Index
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
98.7 |
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
109.6 |
|
34
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Beginning Index Value | |
|
Ending Index Value | |
| |
|
September 13, 2002 | |
|
September 16, 2005 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Compass
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
145.9 |
|
|
Compass Peer Group
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
126.6 |
|
|
NASDAQ Bank Index
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
133.7 |
|
|
S&P Bank Index
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
126.2 |
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
138.0 |
|
Sandler O’Neill also noted that the total reported trading
volume for Compass over the one-year and three-year periods
ended
September 16, 2005 was 125.5 million and
364.4 million shares.
Comparable Company Analysis. Sandler O’Neill used
publicly available information to compare selected financial and
market trading information for Compass and a group of commercial
banks selected by
Sandler O’Neill. This peer group
consisted of the following publicly traded commercial banks:
| |
|
|
|
AmSouth Bancorp
|
|
Mercantile Bankshares Corp. |
|
City National Corp.
|
|
Regions Financial Corp. |
|
Colonial BancGroup, Inc.
|
|
South Financial Group Inc. |
|
Commerce Bancorp Inc.
|
|
Zions Bancorp. |
|
First Horizon National Corp.
|
|
|
Sandler O’Neill used publicly available information to
compare selected financial and market trading information for
Compass and the median data for the commercial banks in the Peer
Group as of and for the twelve months ending
June 30, 2005.
The table below sets forth the comparative data as of and for
the twelve months ending
June 30, 2005, with pricing data
as of
September 16, 2005:
Comparable Group Analysis
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Peer Group | |
| |
|
Compass | |
|
Median | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Total assets (in millions)
|
|
$ |
29,502.9 |
|
|
$ |
32,875.3 |
|
|
Tangible equity/ Tangible assets
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
LTM Return on average assets
|
|
|
1.38 |
% |
|
|
1.33 |
% |
|
LTM Return on average equity
|
|
|
19.17 |
% |
|
|
15.67 |
% |
|
Price/ Tangible book value
|
|
|
321.8 |
% |
|
|
282.4 |
% |
|
Price/ LTM earnings per share
|
|
|
15.1 |
x |
|
|
16.4 |
x |
|
Price/ Estimated 2005 earnings per share
|
|
|
14.5 |
x(1) |
|
|
14.5 |
x(1) |
|
Market Capitalization (in millions)
|
|
$ |
5,863.7 |
|
|
$ |
4,844.3 |
|
Analysis of Selected Merger Transactions. Sandler
O’Neill reviewed 13 merger transactions announced from
January 1, 2004 through
September 16, 2005 involving
commercial banks acquired in Texas (the
“Regional
Group”) with announced transaction values greater than
$25 million.
Sandler O’Neill also reviewed 8 merger
transactions announced in the United States (the
“Nationwide Group”) from
January 1, 2004 through
September 16, 2005 involving commercial banks with
announced transaction values greater than $300 million and
less than $600 million.
Sandler O’Neill reviewed the
following multiples: transaction price at announcement to last
twelve months’ net income, transaction price to stated book
value, transaction price to tangible book value, and tangible
book premium to core deposits.
Sandler O’Neill computed a
high, low, mean, and median multiple and premium for the
transactions. The median multiples from the Regional Group and
the median multiples for the Nationwide Group were applied to
TexasBanc’s financial information as of and for the twelve
months ended
June 30, 2005. As illustrated in the following
table,
Sandler O’Neill derived imputed ranges of values for
TexasBanc of $562.1 million to $373.6 million based
upon the median multiples
35
for the commercial bank transactions in the Regional Group and
$440.5 million to $279.5 million based upon the median
multiples for commercial bank transactions in the Nationwide
Group.
|
|
|
Comparable Transaction Multiples |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Median | |
|
|
| |
|
Median | |
|
|
|
Nationwide | |
|
|
| |
|
Regional Group | |
|
Implied | |
|
Group | |
|
Implied | |
| |
|
Multiple | |
|
Value | |
|
Multiple | |
|
Value | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
($mm) | |
|
|
|
($mm) | |
|
Transaction price/ LTM net income
|
|
|
28.9 |
x |
|
$ |
562.1 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
x |
|
$ |
440.5 |
|
|
Transaction price/ Book value
|
|
|
314.9 |
% |
|
$ |
393.8 |
|
|
|
223.5 |
% |
|
$ |
279.5 |
|
|
Transaction price/ Tangible book value
|
|
|
323.4 |
% |
|
$ |
385.5 |
|
|
|
311.3 |
% |
|
$ |
371.2 |
|
|
Tangible book premium/ Core deposits(1)
|
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
$ |
373.6 |
(2) |
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
$ |
390.6 |
(2) |
|
|
| (1) |
Assumes 16.22% of total deposits are non-core deposits |
| |
| (2) |
Assumes TexasBanc’s total core deposits are
$1,138.7 million. Tangible book premium/core deposits
calculated by dividing the excess of the aggregate transaction
value of $463.5 million over tangible book value by core
deposits |
Discounted Dividend Stream and Terminal Value Analysis of
TexasBanc. Sandler O’Neill performed an analysis that
estimated the future stream of after-tax dividend flows of
TexasBanc through
December 31, 2008 under various
circumstances, assuming TexasBanc’s projected dividend
stream and assuming that TexasBanc performed in accordance with
the earnings projections reviewed with TexasBanc’s
management through 2006. For periods after 2006, Sandler
O’Neill assumed an annual earnings per share growth rate of
approximately 10%. To approximate the terminal value of
TexasBanc common stock at
December 31, 2008, Sandler
O’Neill applied a 14.0x to 24.0x price/ LTM earnings
multiple range. The dividend income streams and terminal values
were then discounted to present values using different discount
rates ranging from 9% to 14% chosen to reflect different
assumptions regarding required rates of return of holders
TexasBanc common stock. As illustrated in the following tables,
this analysis indicated an imputed range of values per share of
TexasBanc common stock of $1,500 to $2,976 when applying the
price/ LTM earnings multiples.
Sandler O’Neill also
considered and discussed with the TexasBanc board how the
present value analyses would be affected by changes in the
underlying assumptions, including variations with respect to net
income, dividend payout ratios, and share repurchases.
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share Multiples |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discount Rate |
|
14.0x | |
|
16.0x | |
|
18.0x | |
|
20.0x | |
|
22.0x | |
|
24.0x | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
9.00%
|
|
$ |
1,736 |
|
|
$ |
1,984 |
|
|
$ |
2,232 |
|
|
$ |
2,480 |
|
|
$ |
2,728 |
|
|
$ |
2,976 |
|
|
10.00%
|
|
$ |
1,685 |
|
|
$ |
1,926 |
|
|
$ |
2,166 |
|
|
$ |
2,407 |
|
|
$ |
2,648 |
|
|
$ |
2,889 |
|
|
10.25%
|
|
$ |
1,673 |
|
|
$ |
1,912 |
|
|
$ |
2,150 |
|
|
$ |
2,389 |
|
|
$ |
2,628 |
|
|
$ |
2,867 |
|
|
11.00%
|
|
$ |
1,636 |
|
|
$ |
1,870 |
|
|
$ |
2,104 |
|
|
$ |
2,337 |
|
|
$ |
2,571 |
|
|
$ |
2,805 |
|
|
12.00%
|
|
$ |
1,589 |
|
|
$ |
1,816 |
|
|
$ |
2,043 |
|
|
$ |
2,270 |
|
|
$ |
2,497 |
|
|
$ |
2,724 |
|
|
13.00%
|
|
$ |
1,544 |
|
|
$ |
1,764 |
|
|
$ |
1,985 |
|
|
$ |
2,206 |
|
|
$ |
2,426 |
|
|
$ |
2,647 |
|
|
14.00%
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
1,715 |
|
|
$ |
1,929 |
|
|
$ |
2,143 |
|
|
$ |
2,358 |
|
|
$ |
2,572 |
|
Discounted Dividend Stream and Terminal Value Analysis of
Compass. Sandler O’Neill performed an analysis that
estimated the future stream of after-tax dividend flows of
Compass through
December 31, 2008 under various
circumstances, assuming the projected dividend stream of Compass
and that Compass performed in accordance with the earnings
projections reviewed with Compass management through 2006. For
periods after 2006,
Sandler O’Neill assumed an annual
earnings per share growth rate of approximately 10%. To
approximate the terminal value of Compass common stock at
December 31, 2008,
Sandler O’Neill applied a 9.0x to
19.0x price/ LTM earnings multiple range. The dividend income
streams and terminal values were then discounted to present
values using different discount rates ranging from 9% to 14%
chosen to reflect
36
different assumptions regarding required rates of return of
holders or prospective buyers of Compass common stock. As
illustrated in the following tables, this analysis indicated an
imputed range of values per share of Compass common stock of
$32.18 to $69.25 when applying the price/ LTM earnings
multiples.
Sandler O’Neill also considered and discussed
with the TexasBanc board how the present value analyses would be
affected by changes in the underlying assumptions, including
variations with respect to net income, dividend payout ratios
and share repurchases. The
10-day average closing
price of Compass common stock on
September 16, 2004 was
$46.93 per share.
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share Multiples |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discount Rate |
|
9.0x | |
|
11.0x | |
|
13.0x | |
|
15.0x | |
|
17.0x | |
|
19.0x | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
9.00%
|
|
$ |
36.71 |
|
|
$ |
43.21 |
|
|
$ |
49.72 |
|
|
$ |
56.23 |
|
|
$ |
62.74 |
|
|
$ |
69.25 |
|
|
10.00%
|
|
$ |
35.73 |
|
|
$ |
42.05 |
|
|
$ |
48.37 |
|
|
$ |
54.68 |
|
|
$ |
61.00 |
|
|
$ |
67.32 |
|
|
10.25%
|
|
$ |
35.49 |
|
|
$ |
41.77 |
|
|
$ |
48.04 |
|
|
$ |
54.31 |
|
|
$ |
60.58 |
|
|
$ |
66.85 |
|
|
11.00%
|
|
$ |
34.79 |
|
|
$ |
40.93 |
|
|
$ |
47.06 |
|
|
$ |
53.20 |
|
|
$ |
59.33 |
|
|
$ |
65.47 |
|
|
12.00%
|
|
$ |
33.89 |
|
|
$ |
39.85 |
|
|
$ |
45.81 |
|
|
$ |
51.76 |
|
|
$ |
57.72 |
|
|
$ |
63.68 |
|
|
13.00%
|
|
$ |
33.02 |
|
|
$ |
38.81 |
|
|
$ |
44.60 |
|
|
$ |
50.38 |
|
|
$ |
56.17 |
|
|
$ |
61.96 |
|
|
14.00%
|
|
$ |
32.18 |
|
|
$ |
37.80 |
|
|
$ |
43.43 |
|
|
$ |
49.05 |
|
|
$ |
54.68 |
|
|
$ |
60.31 |
|
Sandler O’Neill noted that the discounted dividend stream
and terminal value analysis is a widely used valuation
methodology, but the results of such methodology are highly
dependent upon the numerous assumptions that must be made, and
the results thereof are not necessarily indicative of actual
values or future results.
Pro Forma Merger Analysis. Sandler O’Neill analyzed
certain potential pro forma effects of the merger, assuming the
following: (1) the merger closes on
December 31, 2005;
(2) $231.75 million in cash and 4,938,206 shares
of Compass common stock are issued in the merger;
(3) earnings per share projections for TexasBanc are
consistent with internal projections as discussed with
management of TexasBanc and, with respect to Compass, earnings
share projections are consistent with those published by I/B/E/S
and reviewed with Compass’ management, and
(4) purchase accounting adjustments, charges and
transaction costs associated with the merger and cost savings
determined by the senior management of Compass. The analysis
indicated that for the year ending
December 31, 2006, the
merger would be slightly dilutive to the projected earnings per
share of Compass and that at,
December 31, 2005, the
assumed closing date for the merger, dilutive to the tangible
book value per share of Compass. Additionally, Sandler
O’Neill noted that TexasBanc shareholders would own 3.7% of
the combined company at closing.
TexasBanc has agreed to pay
Sandler O’Neill a transaction
fee in connection with the merger of approximately
$4.64 million (based on the closing price of Compass stock
on
September 17, 2005), 25% of which was payable upon
signing of the definitive agreement and the balance of which is
contingent and payable upon completion of the merger. TexasBanc
has also agreed to pay
Sandler O’Neill fees of $150,000 for
rendering its opinion, which will be credited against the
portion of the transaction fee payable upon completion of the
merger. TexasBanc has also agreed to reimburse certain of
Sandler O’Neill’s reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in connection with its engagement and to indemnify
Sandler O’Neill and its affiliates and their
respective partners, directors, officers, employees, agents, and
controlling persons against certain expenses and liabilities,
including liabilities under securities laws.
Sandler O’Neill has in the past provided certain other
investment banking services to TexasBanc and has received
compensation for such services.
Sandler O’Neill also has
provided certain investment banking services to Compass in the
past and has received compensation for such services and may
provide, and receive compensation for, such services in the
future, including during the period before the closing of the
merger. In the ordinary course of its business as a
broker-dealer,
Sandler O’Neill may purchase securities from
and sell securities to TexasBanc and Compass and their
respective affiliates and may actively trade the debt or equity
securities of TexasBanc and Compass and their respective
affiliates for its own account and for the accounts of customers
and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position
in such securities.
37
Accounting Treatment
Compass will account for the merger as a purchase. Compass will
make a determination of the fair value of TexasBanc’s
assets and assumed liabilities in order to allocate the purchase
price of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. To the
extent that the total purchase price exceeds the fair value of
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, Compass may record
goodwill. After the merger, Compass will include the results of
TexasBanc’s operations in its consolidated results of
operations.
Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
The following is a summary of the material anticipated United
States federal income tax consequences of the merger to a
U.S. holder of TexasBanc common stock that surrenders
shares of TexasBanc common stock for shares of Compass common
stock or cash in the merger. This summary does not address any
tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, local or
foreign jurisdiction. The summary is based on the Code, United
States Treasury regulations, administrative rulings and court
decisions in effect as of the date of this proxy statement/
prospectus, all of which are subject to change or differing
interpretations (possibly with retroactive effect), and any such
change or differing interpretation could affect the continuing
validity of this discussion.
For purposes of this summary, the term
“U.S. holder” means, a beneficial owner of
TexasBanc common stock that is, for United States federal income
tax purposes:
|
|
|
| |
• |
a citizen or resident of the United States; |
| |
| |
• |
a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation for
United States federal income tax purposes, created or organized
under the laws of the United States or of any state or the
District of Columbia; |
| |
| |
• |
a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of
a court within the United States and one or more United States
persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions
of the trust, or (2) was in existence on August 20,
1996 and has a valid election in effect under applicable
Treasury regulations to continue to be treated as a United
States person; or |
| |
| |
• |
an estate that is subject to United States federal income tax on
its income regardless of its source. |
If a partnership (including for this purpose any other entity
treated as a partnership for United States federal income
tax purposes) holds TexasBanc common stock, the tax treatment of
a partner will generally depend on the status of the partners
and the activities of the partnership. If a U.S. holder is
a partner in a partnership holding TexasBanc common stock, such
holder should consult its tax advisor.
This discussion only addresses TexasBanc’s shareholders
that hold their shares of TexasBanc common stock as a capital
asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code.
Further, this summary does not address all aspects of United
States federal income taxation that may be relevant to a
TexasBanc shareholder in light of such holder’s particular
circumstances or that may be applicable to holders subject to
special treatment under United States federal income tax laws
(including, for example, tax-exempt organizations, mutual funds,
a trader in securities who elects to apply a mark to market
method of accounting, dealers in securities or foreign
currencies, banks, insurance companies, financial institutions
or persons that hold their TexasBanc common stock as part of a
hedge, straddle, constructive sale or conversion transaction, an
S corporation, partnership or other pass through entity (or
an investor in an S corporation, partnership of other pass
through entity), holders subject to the alternative minimum tax
provisions of the Code, holders whose functional currency is not
the U.S. dollar, holders that exercise appraisal rights, or
holders who acquired their TexasBanc common stock through the
exercise of an employee stock option, through a tax qualified
retirement plan or otherwise as compensation). In addition, no
information is provided in this proxy statement/ prospectus with
respect to the tax consequences of the merger under applicable
state, local or non-United States laws or United States tax laws
other than United States federal income tax laws. No ruling has
been requested from the IRS regarding the United
States federal income tax consequences of the merger. No
assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a
court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of the tax
consequences set forth below.
HOLDERS ARE URGED TO CONSULT WITH THEIR TAX ADVISORS
REGARDING THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER TO THEM, INCLUDING
THE EFFECTS OF
38
UNITED STATES FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL, FOREIGN AND
OTHER TAX LAWS AND OF CHANGES IN THOSE LAWS.
The merger is intended to qualify as a reorganization under
Section 368(a) of the Code for United States federal
income tax purposes. It is a condition to each party’s
obligation to consummate the merger that it receive an opinion
from its tax counsel, dated as of the closing date of the
merger, to the effect that the merger will be treated as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code.
These opinions will be based on representation letters provided
by TexasBanc and Compass and on customary factual assumptions.
If any of the representations or assumptions upon which the
opinions are based are inconsistent with the actual facts, the
tax consequences of the merger could be adversely affected. The
determination by tax counsel as to whether the proposed merger
will be treated as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code will depend upon the facts and
law existing at the effective time of the proposed merger. The
opinions are not binding on the IRS or any court and do not
preclude the IRS from asserting, or a court from sustaining, a
contrary conclusion.
Assuming the merger qualifies as a reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, TexasBanc and
Compass will not recognize any gain or loss for United States
federal income tax purposes as a result of the merger. Assuming
the merger is treated as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, the material United States
federal income tax consequences of the merger to
U.S. holders of TexasBanc common stock are, in general, as
follows:
|
|
|
Exchange of TexasBanc Common Stock Solely for Compass
Common Stock. |
A TexasBanc shareholder that exchanges all of its shares of
TexasBanc common stock solely for Compass common stock in the
merger will not recognize any gain or loss (except with respect
to cash received instead of fractional shares of Compass common
stock, as discussed below). The aggregate tax basis of the
shares of Compass common stock received in the merger (including
any fractional shares deemed received and exchanged for cash as
described below) will be equal to the aggregate tax basis in the
shares of TexasBanc common stock surrendered in exchange for the
Compass common stock, and an exchanging TexasBanc
shareholder’s holding period in the Compass common stock
received in the merger (including any fractional shares deemed
received and exchanged for cash as described below) will include
the holding period of the shares of TexasBanc common stock
surrendered in exchange for the Compass common stock.
|
|
|
Exchange of TexasBanc Common Stock Solely for Cash. |
A TexasBanc shareholder that exchanges all of its shares of
TexasBanc common stock solely for cash in the merger will
recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the
difference between the amount of cash received and the
holder’s tax basis in the TexasBanc common stock
surrendered. The capital gain or loss recognized will be
long-term capital gain or loss if, as of the effective date of
the merger, the holder’s holding period for the TexasBanc
common stock surrendered exceeds one year. The deductibility of
capital losses is subject to limitations. In some cases, if a
holder actually or constructively owns Compass common stock
after the merger, the cash received could be treated as having
the effect of the distribution of a dividend under the tests set
forth in Section 302 of the Code (as described below), in
which case such holder may have dividend income up to the amount
of the cash received. In such cases, holders that are
corporations should consult their tax advisors regarding the
potential applicability of the “extraordinary
dividend” provisions of the Code.
|
|
|
Exchange of TexasBanc Common Stock for Compass Common
Stock and Cash. |
A TexasBanc shareholder that receives a combination of Compass
common stock and cash in exchange for all of its shares of
TexasBanc common stock will recognize gain (but not loss) in an
amount equal to the lesser of (i) the sum of the amount of
cash and the fair market value of the Compass common stock
received in the merger minus the shareholder’s aggregate
tax basis in its TexasBanc common stock surrendered and
(ii) the amount of cash the shareholder receives in the
merger (other than cash received instead of fractional shares of
Compass common stock).
39
A TexasBanc shareholder’s aggregate tax basis in the
Compass common stock received in the merger (including any
fractional shares deemed received and exchanged for cash as
described below) will be equal to the shareholder’s
aggregate tax basis in its TexasBanc common stock surrendered,
decreased by the amount of any cash received (other than cash
received instead of fractional shares of Compass common stock)
and increased by the amount of any gain recognized (other than
gain recognized with respect to cash received instead of
fractional shares of Compass common stock). A TexasBanc
shareholder’s holding period for Compass common stock
received in the merger (including any fractional shares deemed
received and exchanged for cash) will include the holding period
of the TexasBanc common stock surrendered in the merger.
|
|
|
Possible Treatment of Cash as a Dividend. |
Any gain recognized in the exchange will be capital gain unless
the TexasBanc shareholder’s receipt of cash has the effect
of a distribution of a dividend, in which case the gain will be
treated as dividends to the extent of the holder’s ratable
share of accumulated earnings and profits, as calculated for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. For purposes of
determining whether an TexasBanc shareholder’s receipt of
cash has the effect of a distribution of a dividend, the
TexasBanc shareholder will be treated as if it first exchanged
all of its TexasBanc common stock solely in exchange for Compass
common stock and then Compass immediately redeemed a portion of
that stock for the cash that the holder actually received in the
merger. Receipt of cash will generally not have the effect of a
distribution of a dividend of the TexasBanc shareholder if such
receipt is, with respect to the TexasBanc shareholder, “not
essentially equivalent to a dividend” or
“substantially disproportionate,” each within the
meaning of Section 302(b) of the Code. The IRS has
indicated in rulings that any reduction in the interest of a
minority shareholder that owns a small number of shares in a
publicly and widely held corporation and that exercises no
control over corporate affairs would result in capital gain (as
opposed to dividend) treatment. In determining the interest of a
shareholder in a corporation, certain constructive ownership
rules must be taken into account. Any capital gain will be
long-term if the TexasBanc shareholder’s holding period for
its TexasBanc common stock is more than one year as of the date
of the exchange.
|
|
|
Cash in Lieu of Fractional Shares. |
A holder of TexasBanc common stock who receives cash in lieu of
a fractional share of Compass common stock generally will be
treated as having received such fractional share in the merger
and then as having received cash in exchange for such fractional
share. As a result, assuming that the redemption of a fractional
share of TexasBanc common stock is treated as a sale or exchange
and not as a dividend, gain or loss generally will be recognized
based on the difference between the amount of cash received in
lieu of the fractional share and the tax basis allocated to such
fractional share of Compass common stock and such gain or loss
generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if, as of the
effective date of the merger, the holding period for such share
is greater than one year.
|
|
|
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting. |
In general, a non-corporate TexasBanc shareholder receiving cash
in the merger may be subject to information reporting to the
IRS. In addition, backup withholding at the applicable rate
(currently 28%) may apply to cash payments received unless the
exchanging TexasBanc shareholder either provides an accurate
taxpayer identification number and certifies that it is not
subject to backup withholding (generally on a substitute IRS
Form W-9) or
otherwise establishes an exemption to the satisfaction of
Compass and the exchange agent. Any amount withheld as backup
withholding from payments to an exchanging TexasBanc shareholder
will be allowed by the IRS as a refund or credit against the
TexasBanc shareholder’s federal income tax liability if the
shareholder timely furnishes the required information to the
IRS. TexasBanc shareholders should consult their tax advisors as
to their qualifications for exemption from backup withholding
and the procedure for establishing an exemption.
40
A TexasBanc shareholder who receives Compass common stock as a
result of the merger will generally be required to retain
records pertaining to the merger and will be required to file
with such shareholder’s United States federal income tax
return for the year in which the merger takes place a statement
setting forth certain facts relating to the merger.
The preceding summary does not address tax consequences that may
vary with, or are contingent on, individual circumstances.
Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisers as to the
specific tax consequences to them of the merger, including tax
return reporting requirements, the applicability and effect of
federal, state, local, foreign and other applicable tax laws and
the effect of any proposed changes in such tax laws.
Governmental and Regulatory Approvals
Completion of the merger is subject to prior receipt of all
required approvals and consents by all applicable federal and
state regulatory authorities. Compass and TexasBanc have agreed
to cooperate and use all reasonable best efforts to obtain all
permits, consents, approvals and authorizations from any
governmental or regulatory authority necessary to consummate the
transactions contemplated by the agreement and
plan of merger as
promptly as practicable.
The approval of the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding
Company Act is generally required for the indirect acquisition
of a bank under Section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act.
Section 3 requires the Federal Reserve, when considering a
transaction such as this one, to take into consideration the
financial and managerial resources of the companies and the
banks concerned, including the competence, experience and
integrity of its officers, directors and principal shareholders,
the future prospects of the companies and banks concerned, their
compliance with laws intended to detect and combat money
laundering, and the effect of the transaction on the convenience
and needs of the communities to be served. In considering
financial resources and future prospects, the Federal Reserve
will, among other things, evaluate the adequacy of the capital
levels of the parties to a proposed transaction and of the
resulting institutions. The Federal Reserve, in turn, is
required to provide notice to the Texas Department of Banking,
the regulator of TexasBanc’s sole bank subsidiary,
TexasBank.
The Bank Holding Company Act prohibits the Federal Reserve from
approving a merger if it would result in a monopoly or be in
furtherance of any combination or conspiracy to monopolize or to
attempt to monopolize the business of banking in any part of the
United States or its effect in any section of the country would
be substantially to lessen competition or to tend to create a
monopoly, or if it would in any other respect result in a
restraint of trade, unless the Federal Reserve finds that the
anti-competitive effects of the merger are clearly outweighed by
the probable effect of the transaction in meeting the
convenience and needs of the communities to be served.
In addition, under the Community Reinvestment Act, the Federal
Reserve must take into account the record of performance of the
depository institution
subsidiaries of Compass and TexasBanc in
meeting the credit needs of the communities served by such
institutions, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.
The merger may not be completed until the 30th day, or,
with the consent of the relevant agencies, the 15th day,
after the date of Federal Reserve approval, during which period
the United States Department of Justice may comment adversely on
the merger or challenge the merger on antitrust grounds. The
commencement of an antitrust action would stay the effectiveness
of the Federal Reserve approval unless a court specifically
orders otherwise.
|
|
|
Status of Applications and Notices. |
Compass and TexasBanc have either filed or intend to complete
the filing promptly after the date of this proxy statement/
prospectus of all required applications and notices with
applicable regulatory authorities in connection with the merger
by the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus. There can be no
assurance that all
41
requisite approvals will be obtained, that such approvals will
be received on a timely basis or that such approvals will not
impose conditions or requirements that, individually or in the
aggregate, would or could reasonably be expected to have a
material adverse effect on the financial conditions, results of
operations or business of TexasBanc or Compass after completion
of the merger. If any such condition or requirement is imposed,
either Compass or TexasBanc may elect not to consummate the
merger. See
“The Agreement and Plan of Merger —
Conditions to the Completion of the Merger” beginning on
page 59.
Procedures for Making Elections
Before the completion of the merger until one year after the
effective time of the merger, Compass will make available on a
timely basis or cause to made available to an exchange agent
agreed upon by Compass and TexasBanc, which we refer to as the
“exchange agent”, (1) certificates or, at
Compass’ option, evidence of shares in book-entry form,
representing the shares of Compass common stock to be issued
under the agreement and
plan of merger and (2) cash payable
as part of the cash portion of the merger consideration and
instead of any fractional shares of Compass common stock to be
issued under the agreement and
plan of merger. Promptly after
the effective time of the merger, the exchange agent will
exchange certificates representing shares of TexasBanc common
stock for the merger consideration. No interest will accrue or
be paid with respect to any property to be delivered upon
surrender of TexasBanc stock certificates.
If any Compass stock certificate is to be issued, or cash
payment made, in a name other than that in which the TexasBanc
stock certificate surrendered in exchange for the merger
consideration is registered, the person requesting the exchange
must pay any transfer or other taxes required by reason of the
issuance of the new Compass certificate or the payment of the
cash consideration in a name other than that of the registered
holder of the TexasBanc stock certificate surrendered, or must
establish to the satisfaction of Compass and the exchange agent
that any such taxes have been paid or are not applicable.
The agreement and
plan of merger provides that the cash or stock
elections will be made on a form mutually agreed upon by Compass
and TexasBanc. The exchange agent will mail or deliver to each
holder of record of TexasBanc common stock, at the same time
TexasBanc shareholders are mailed this proxy statement/
prospectus, the election form and customary transmittal
materials containing instructions for use in effecting the
surrender of TexasBanc stock certificates in exchange for the
merger consideration. TexasBanc and Compass have agreed to mail
the election form and transmittal materials to each holder of
record of TexasBanc common stock as of
December 30, 2005,
the record date.
|
|
|
Election Deadline; Submission of Election
Materials. |
To be effective, election forms must be properly completed,
signed and actually received by the exchange agent not later
than 5:00 p.m., New York time, on
February 15,
2006, the day immediately before the special meeting of
TexasBanc shareholders.
An election form will be properly completed only if accompanied
by certificates representing all shares of TexasBanc common
stock covered by the election form.
Generally, an election may be revoked, but only by written
notice received by the exchange agent before the election
deadline. If an election is revoked and any certificates have
been transmitted to the exchange agent, the exchange agent will,
upon written request, return those certificates to the
shareholder who submitted them.
Shares of TexasBanc common stock as to which the holder has not
made a valid election before the election deadline, including as
a result of revocation, will be treated as no election shares.
|
|
|
Dividends and Distributions. |
No dividends or other distributions with a record date after the
effective time will be paid. When duly surrendered, Compass will
pay, without interest, any unpaid dividends or other
distributions declared before
42
the effective time but not paid. After the effective time, there
will be no transfers on the stock transfer books of TexasBanc of
any shares of TexasBanc common stock. If certificates
representing shares of TexasBanc common stock are presented for
transfer after the completion of the merger, they will be
cancelled and exchanged for the merger consideration into which
the shares of TexasBanc common stock represented by that
certificate have been converted.
The exchange agent will be entitled to deduct and withhold from
the merger consideration payable to any TexasBanc shareholder
the amounts it is required to deduct and withhold under any
federal, state, local or foreign tax law. If the exchange agent
withholds any amounts, these amounts will be treated for all
purposes of the merger as having been paid to the shareholders
from whom the amounts were withheld.
|
|
|
No Fractional Shares Will Be Issued. |
Compass will not issue fractional shares of Compass common stock
in the merger. There will be no dividends or voting rights with
respect to any fractional common shares. For each fractional
share of common stock that would otherwise be issued, Compass
will pay cash in an amount equal to the fraction of a whole
share that would otherwise have been issued, multiplied by the
average closing sale prices of one share of Compass common stock
for the ten consecutive trading days on the NASDAQ immediately
proceeding the completion of the merger. No interest will be
paid or accrued on the cash paid for fractional shares.
|
|
|
Lost, Stolen or Destroyed TexasBanc Stock
Certificates. |
If you have lost a certificate representing TexasBanc common
stock, or it has been stolen or destroyed, Compass will issue to
you the common stock or cash payable under the agreement and
plan of merger if you submit an affidavit of that fact and post
a bond in such reasonable amount as Compass or the exchange
agent may direct to protect against any claim that may be made
against Compass about ownership of the lost, stolen or destroyed
certificate.
43
INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER
Certain of TexasBanc’s directors and executive officers may
have interests in the merger that are different from, or in
addition to, their interests as shareholders of TexasBanc.
TexasBanc’s board of directors was aware of these interests
and took them into account at the time they approved the
agreement and
plan of merger.
Employment Agreements
As an inducement and condition to Compass’ willingness to
enter into the agreement and
plan of merger, each of Vernon W.
Bryant, Jr. (who serves as President and a director of
TexasBanc, and President, Chief Executive Officer and a director
of TexasBank), William H. Adams, III (who serves as
Fort Worth Regional President of TexasBank), Bruce H.
McNeil (who serves as Ridgmar Regional President of TexasBank),
Damon S.
“Stan” O’Neil (who serves as Northeast
Regional President of TexasBank), and Wayne W.
“Wade”
Wallace (who serves as Parker County and Denton Regional
President of TexasBank) entered into employment agreements with
Compass Bank, an Alabama banking corporation and wholly-owned
subsidiary of Compass, which become effective at the effective
time of the merger and continue in effect for two years
thereafter (three years in the case of Mr. Bryant).
Under the employment agreements, following completion of the
merger, each of the executives will serve as a Regional
President of a designated geographic area of Compass Bank. The
minimum base salary under the respective employment agreements
is $345,000 for Mr. Bryant, $190,000 for Mr. Adams,
$180,000 for Mr. McNeil, $210,000 for Mr. O’Neil
and $200,000 for Mr. Wallace. Each executive’s base
salary is subject to annual review and may be increased.
Additionally, each executive is entitled to an annual cash bonus
based on the achievement of pre-established performance goals,
with a target annual bonus of not less than 100% of his annual
base salary for Mr. Bryant, 40% of their respective annual
base salaries for Messrs. Adams and McNeil, and 50% of
their respective annual base salaries for
Messrs. O’Neil and Wallace. The executives are
guaranteed an annual bonus in 2006 which will not be less than
$285,000 for Mr. Bryant, $38,000 for Mr. Adams,
$36,000 for Mr. McNeil, $52,500 for Mr. O’Neil
and $85,000 for Mr. Wallace.
Under the employment agreements, each executive also will
receive an initial restricted stock award which will vest in
full on the third anniversary of the date of grant, subject to
the executive’s continued employment with Compass Bank
through the vesting date, except that these awards will fully
vest if the executive is terminated by Compass Bank without
cause (as defined in the employment agreement) or upon the
occurrence of a change of control of Compass. The value of each
executive’s initial restricted stock award will be equal to
his minimum annual base salary. Each executive will also be
eligible for an annual stock option grant, at the time and on
the terms and conditions as determined by Compass’
Compensation Committee.
Further, subject to the executive’s continued employment on
the date of grant of annual awards in respect to Compass
Bank’s 2006 fiscal year, the executive will be granted a
stock option to acquire the following number of shares of
Compass common stock: Messrs. Bryant and
O’Neil — 7,500 shares, Messrs. McNeil
and Wallace — 7,000 shares and
Mr. Adams — 6,500 shares. These options will
vest in full on the third anniversary date of the date of grant,
subject to the executive’s continued employment with
Compass Bank through the vesting date, except that these awards
will fully vest if the executive is terminated by Compass Bank
without cause or upon the occurrence of a change of control of
Compass.
The executives will also receive the benefits that are generally
made available to employees of equal grade and base salary on
the same basis as Compass Bank makes the benefits available to
its other employees, including participation in Compass
Bancshares, Inc. SmartInvestor Retirement Plan and
non-qualified deferred
compensation plan. In addition, Compass Bank will pay country
club membership fees and monthly dues for each executive as well
as provide a $500 monthly automobile allowance.
Each employment agreement also provides that upon termination of
employment by Compass Bank other than for cause or disability or
by the executive for good reason (as defined in the employment
agreement), such executive will receive his annual base salary
for the longer of (1) the remainder of the employment
period or (2) six months from the termination date. Each
executive is also subject to certain non-competition
44
and non-solicitation covenants while employed and for a
specified period thereafter. The employment agreements provide
that payments under the agreement will not be made if they could
reasonably be expected to be parachute payments under
Section 280G of the Code, and as such, TexasBanc is seeking
shareholder approval for purposes of Section 280G of these
employment agreements. See “Proposal 2 —
Approval of 280G Payments” beginning on page 72 of
this proxy statement/ prospectus.
Treatment of TexasBanc Stock Options
Certain executive officers have options to purchase shares of
TexasBanc common stock. The table under
“— Benefits Table” sets forth each of the
executive officers who have such options and the number of
options each executive officer has been awarded. Under the
TexasBanc stock option plan, TexasBanc may, in its discretion,
accelerate the vesting of any unvested TexasBanc stock option,
thus allowing the option holders (including the executives) to
exercise stock options which would otherwise be unvested, as
well as previously vested stock options, for shares of TexasBanc
common stock. TexasBanc presently intends to accelerate the
vesting of any unvested TexasBanc stock options prior to the
shareholder meeting such that holders of TexasBanc options will
be able to exercise those options and make an election with
respect to the shares of TexasBanc common stock that they
receive. The merger agreement permits TexasBanc to accelerate
the vesting of the TexasBanc stock options 15 days before
the closing of the merger, which TexasBanc believes will be
prior to the shareholder meeting. If it is reasonably likely
that prior to the shareholders meeting it appears that the
closing of the merger will not be consummated within
15 days of the shareholder meeting, Compass intends to
permit TexasBanc to accelerate the vesting of the unvested
TexasBanc stock options on a sooner date such that in all cases
the holders of the TexasBanc options will be able to exercise
those options prior to the deadline for making an election.
Under the agreement and
plan of merger, before the effective
time of the merger, TexasBanc must require that all such stock
options that have been granted under the TexasBanc stock option
plan (including previously unvested stock options which have had
their vesting accelerated as described above) either be
exercised or cancelled. An optionee may, to the extent permitted
in his or her option award agreement, pay the exercise price of
an option by surrendering the appropriate number of shares of
TexasBanc common stock owned by the optionee (including shares
of TexasBanc acquired upon the exercise of a vested option).
Upon exercise of an option, TexasBanc will pay to each optionee
a
“capital gain gross up payment”. The amount of this
capital gain gross up payment is intended to reimburse the
optionee for any federal income taxes that the optionee has to
pay in excess of the federal long-term capital gains tax rate as
a result of exercising an option. The amount of a capital gain
gross up payment will be credited first to the optionee’s
withholding obligations on the option exercise, then to the
exercise price of the acquired shares, and, finally, any
remaining amount of the capital gain gross up payment that is
left will be paid to the optionee in cash.
Regardless of the number of shares issued as a result of the
exercise of TexasBanc stock options, in no event will Compass
issue more than 4,938,206 shares of Compass common stock or
pay more than $231.75 million in cash in merger
consideration. If there are more than 2,264 shares issued
as a result of the exercise of TexasBanc stock options the
consideration payable to each shareholder will be
proportionately reduced if necessary to give effect to the
foregoing limits. As of the date of this proxy statement/
prospectus, there were outstanding options to acquire
3,600 shares of TexasBanc common stock. All of the
TexasBanc stock options had exercise prices below the value of
the merger consideration as of the date of this proxy statement/
prospectus. Because TexasBanc option holders can pay the
exercise price of their TexasBanc stock options either in cash
or by surrendering shares of TexasBanc common stock, the exact
number of shares of TexasBanc common stock to be issued as a
result of the exercise of TexasBanc stock options will not be
known until immediately before the closing of the merger.
Change in Control Payments
TexasBanc and Compass have agreed that the completion of the
merger will constitute a “change in control” under the
change in control agreements with certain executive officers as
set forth in the table under “— Benefits
Table”. In full satisfaction of TexasBanc’s
obligations under those agreements, immediately before the
completion of the merger, each executive officer will receive
their respective amounts, including
45
those amounts set forth as “change in control
payments” in the table under “— Benefits
Table”. In connection with their receipt of such change in
control payments, Messrs. Adams, Bryant, McNeil,
O’Neil and Wallace, who are sometimes collectively referred
to in this proxy statement/ prospectus as the “five
executive officers”, will be required to sign and deliver
to Compass a release of claims in favor of TexasBanc, Compass
and their respective affiliates.
Special Bonus Payments
At the time the merger is completed, each of Messrs. Adams,
Bryant, McNeil, O’Neil and Wallace will receive a special
bonus payment in the amount of $1,000,000, $2,500,000,
$1,000,000, $1,250,000, and $750,000, respectively. In
connection with their receipt of such special bonus payments,
Messrs. Adams, Bryant, McNeil, O’Neil and Wallace will
be required to sign and deliver to Compass a release of claims
in favor of TexasBanc, Compass and their respective affiliates.
Stay Pay Agreements
Each of the executive officers of TexasBanc have been provided
stay pay agreements as an inducement for them to maintain their
employment with TexasBank until the closing date of the merger
or, in certain cases, until certain data conversion and
implementation processes are complete after the merger. We refer
to this period as the
“stay period”. The table under
“— Benefits Table” lists the amounts that
each executive officer is entitled to receive under his or her
respective stay pay agreement. Generally, the payment is to be
made in a lump-sum at the end of the stay period, except Charles
P.
“Pat” Hamilton (who serves as Weatherford Banking
Center President of TexasBank) and Lee Ann Capel (who serves as
Chief Administration Officer and Executive Vice President of
TexasBank) are to receive partial payments of $67,500 (25% of
his stay pay amount) and $180,000 (50% of her stay pay amount),
respectively, as of
December 31, 2005, with the remaining
balance to be paid when the merger is completed.
Salary Continuation Agreement
Messrs. Bryant and Hamilton, and Roy Glenn Wright (who
serves as Chief Lending Officer of TexasBank), previously
entered into salary continuation agreements pursuant to which
they each will receive payments of certain amounts upon the
occurrence of certain events, including retirement, death,
disability, termination of employment, or certain terminations
of employment following a change of control of TexasBanc. The
table under “— Benefits Table” lists the
accelerated portion of the salary continuation pay that each of
these executives will be entitled to receive under his
respective salary continuation agreement upon termination of
employment following a change of control as a result of the
merger.
The arrangements described above generally provide that the
payments made under those arrangements will be reduced to the
extent necessary to avoid the imposition of the excise tax under
Section 4999 of the Code and the loss of deductibility
under Section 280G of the Code. However, by this proxy
statement/ prospectus, TexasBanc is seeking shareholder approval
under Section 280G of the Code of the payments to be made
under these arrangements, and if such shareholder approval is
obtained, the payments will not be reduced. See
“Proposal 2 — Approval of 280G
Payments” beginning on page 72 of this proxy
statement/ prospectus.
TexasBank Nonqualified Senior Management Deferred
Compensation Plan
TexasBanc maintains the TexasBank Nonqualified Senior Management
Deferred Compensation Plan, or Deferred Compensation Plan, which
for tax purposes is an unfunded and nonqualified plan, for the
benefit of certain employees of TexasBanc or its
subsidiaries
who are in management or who are highly compensated employees.
The Deferred Compensation Plan provides the participating
employees with the ability to defer the receipt of certain
portions of their income received from TexasBanc (or the
applicable participating subsidiary) and to receive credit for
earnings on those amounts while deferred. TexasBanc (or the
applicable participating subsidiary) may also make certain
discretionary contributions, including a discretionary matching
contribution, to the Deferred Compensation Plan on behalf of
participating employees each year.
46
Participants are 100% vested in their own contributions;
however, discretionary contributions (and earnings thereon) made
by TexasBanc (or the applicable participating subsidiary) are
subject to a 5-year
“cliff” vesting requirement (i.e., the employee is 0%
vested in such amount and not entitled to such contributions or
earnings on those amounts until 5 years after the
contribution is made). However, upon a change of control,
participants become vested in discretionary contributions and
earnings on a 1 to 5 year “graded” vested
schedule as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
| Time Elapsed Following Crediting of Discretionary Contribution |
|
Vested Percentage | |
| |
|
| |
|
Less Than 1 Year
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
1 year or more, but less than 2 years
|
|
|
20% |
|
|
2 year or more, but less than 3 years
|
|
|
40% |
|
|
3 year or more, but less than 4 years
|
|
|
60% |
|
|
4 year or more, but less than 5 years
|
|
|
80% |
|
|
5 years or more
|
|
|
100% |
|
Therefore, to the extent that an employee participating in the
Deferred Compensation Plan is not fully vested upon a change of
control, the employee will receive accelerated vesting in the
applicable percentage of his or her discretionary contributions
and earnings with which the employee has been credited.
Additionally, upon a change of control, TexasBanc’s
Chairman of the Board immediately before the change of control
has the right to appoint an independent third party to
administer the Deferred Compensation Plan. The table under
“— Benefits Table” below lists the directors
and executive officers who have an interest in the Deferred
Compensation Plan and the amount of the discretionary
contribution that will vest as a result of the merger.
Severance Pay
Under TexasBank’s severance pay policy, an employee of
TexasBank (including employees of TexasBank who are executive
officers of TexasBanc) will be eligible for severance pay if the
employee’s employment is terminated, including a
termination related to the merger, due to reduction in
TexasBank’s work force or an elimination of the position.
Two weeks severance pay will be granted for each year of service
with TexasBank (severance pay will be prorated for partial
years), up to a maximum of 26 weeks, in addition to all
accrued and unused vacation. The table under
“— Benefits Table” below lists the amounts
of severance pay under this policy that the executive officers
will receive in the event of a qualifying termination of
employment, although the five executive officers waived their
rights to severance under this policy pursuant to the terms of
the new employment agreements with Compass.
47
Benefits Table
The table below provides the value of the indicated benefits*
that may be received with respect to each applicable director or
executive officer of TexasBanc.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated | |
|
Accelerated | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of | |
|
Portion of | |
| |
|
TexasBanc | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in | |
|
Deferred | |
|
Salary | |
| |
|
Stock | |
|
Option | |
|
|
|
Special Bonus | |
|
Severance | |
|
Control | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Continuation | |
| Name |
|
Options | |
|
Gross-Up | |
|
Stay Pay | |
|
Payment | |
|
Pay(1) | |
|
Payment | |
|
Plan Pay | |
|
Pay | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
William H. Adams, III
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
$ |
14,747 |
|
|
$ |
360,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
32,548 |
|
|
$ |
180,000 |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
Joe N. Barnhart
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
65,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
47,562 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
$ |
29,493 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
162,500 |
|
|
$ |
510,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
139,511 |
|
|
Lee Ann Capel
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
360,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
69,231 |
|
|
$ |
180,000 |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
Charles E. Cox
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
174,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
39,952 |
|
|
$ |
174,000 |
|
|
$ |
11,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
William P. Cranz
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
154,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
52,886 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
Lisanne Davidson
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
152,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
21,126 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
William D. Gray
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
11,349 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
Charles P. “Pat” Hamilton
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
270,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
67,500 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
27,590 |
|
|
Robert R. Hampton
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
65,775 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
32,123 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
105,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
Bruce H. McNeil
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
$ |
14,747 |
|
|
$ |
340,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
56,750 |
|
|
$ |
170,000 |
|
|
$ |
11,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
Glenn T. Monroe
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
$ |
36,572 |
|
|
$ |
85,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
14,438 |
|
|
$ |
255,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
Damon S. “Stan” O’Neil
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
$ |
14,747 |
|
|
$ |
400,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,250,000 |
|
|
$ |
64,215 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
James C. Parks, Jr.
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
131,250 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
30,058 |
|
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
Wayne W. “Wade” Wallace
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
$ |
66,383 |
|
|
$ |
380,000 |
|
|
$ |
750,000 |
|
|
$ |
40,563 |
|
|
$ |
190,000 |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
Roy Glenn Wright
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
80,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
24,677 |
|
|
|
|
| |
* |
Benefit calculations are based on the assumption that the merger
will become effective as of February 17, 2006 and the stock
options will be exercised on that date. |
|
|
| (1) |
Based on current salaries as of the date of this proxy
statement/ prospectus. |
| |
| (2) |
Mr. Bryant’s change in control payment is payable
pursuant to his salary continuation agreement and is in addition
to his salary continuation pay. |
Compass and TexasBanc have agreed that, to the extent requested
by Compass, certain of the arrangements described above,
including the Deferred Compensation Plan and the Salary
Continuation Agreements, will be terminated and the amounts
payable thereunder distributed prior to the effective time of
the merger and as early as
December 31, 2005.
License Agreement
TexasBank, a Texas banking association with its home office in
Fort Worth, Texas and a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of
TexasBanc, and Texas Bank, a Texas banking association with its
home office in Brownwood, Texas, entered into a license
agreement providing Brownwood with the limited, royalty-free,
exclusive license to use the name TexasBank and certain related
trademarks of TexasBank in a limited geographical area for a
period of 10 years after the effective time of the merger.
The geographic area includes the cities of Brownwood, Texas,
Bangs, Texas, Dublin, Texas, Stephenville, Texas and within a
75 mile radius of each of those cities, but specifically
excludes Bell County, Collin County, Dallas County, Denton
County, Hood County, McLennan County, Parker County and Tarrant
County. If during the term of the license agreement, TexasBank
receives a stand alone offer by a third person to acquire the
related trademarks, Brownwood will have the right of first and
last refusal to acquire the same rights or assets on the same
terms and conditions as offered by the third party.
48
Bill Knight, Chairman of the Board of TexasBanc, serves as a
director of Brownwood, and Mr. Knight, together with
Dorothy Doss, a director of TexasBanc, beneficially own
approximately 68% of the outstanding common stock of Brownwood.
Director and Officers Indemnification and Insurance