SEC Info  
  Home     Search     My Interests     Help     Sign In     Please Sign In  

Mastec Inc ˇ PRER14A ˇ On 1/24/94

Filed On 1/24/94   ˇ   SEC File 1-08106   ˇ   Accession Number 898432-94-1

  in   Show  and 
Help... Wildcards:  ? (any letter),  * (many).  Logic:  for Docs: (and), (or);  for Text: (anywhere),  "(&)" (near).
  As Of               Filer                 Filing     On/For/As Docs:Pgs              Issuer               Agent

 1/24/94  Mastec Inc                        PRER14A                3:173                                    898432

Revised Preliminary Proxy Solicitation Material   ˇ   Schedule 14A
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: PRER14A     Proxy Statement                                      166    640K 
 2: EX-2        Exhibit A                                              3     17K 
 3: EX-6        Exhibit B                                              4     22K 


PRER14A   ˇ   Proxy Statement
Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page
10Company
14Change of Control
15The Redemption
16Outstanding Stock Options
18Indemnification
"Accounting Treatment
20Operations Following the Acquisition
21Proposal to Approve Acquisition Agreement With Church & Tower, Inc. and Church & Tower of Florida, Inc
37Report and Opinion of Financial Advisor
44Terms of the Acquisition Agreement
45Conditions of the Acquisition
46Registration Rights
47Certain Effects of the Acquisition
49Federal Income Tax Considerations
51Interest of Certain Persons in Matters to be Acted Upon
53Restrictions on Resales of Burnup Shares to be Issued in the Acquisition
56Proposal to Approve Amendments to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation
67Proposal to Approve 1994 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors
71The Company
77Incentive Stock Options
80Change in Control
82Election of Director
"Management
84Proposed Directors and Executive Officers
89Executive Compensation
90Aggregate Fiscal Year-End Stock Option Value Table
95Certain Transactions and Litigation
103CT Group
124Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof
129Index to Financial Statements
PRER14A1st Page of 166TOCTopPreviousNextBottomJust 1st
 
Sponsored Ads...

BURNUP & SIMS INC. The undersigned hereby appoints ^ and , or either of them, each with the power to appoint his substitute, proxies to represent the undersigned and to vote as designated below all of the shares of Common Stock of Burnup & Sims Inc. (the "Company") held of record by the undersigned on ^, 1994 at the Annual and Special Meeting of Stockholders (the "Meeting") to be held on ^ March , 1994 and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1. ELECTION OF SAMUEL C. HATHORN, JR. AS DIRECTOR. /__/ FOR the nominee listed above /__/ WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for the nominee listed above ^ 2. TO APPROVE THE TERMS OF AN AGREEMENT DATED AS OF OCTOBER 15, 1993, AS AMENDED ^, PURSUANT TO WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, (i) THE COMPANY WILL ACQUIRE ALL OF THE OUTSTANDING CAPITAL STOCK OF CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. IN EXCHANGE FOR 10,250,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF THE COMPANY AND (ii) IMMEDIATELY THEREAFTER, THE COMPANY WILL REDEEM 3,153,847 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF THE COMPANY OWNED BY NATIONAL BEVERAGE CORP. ("NBC") IN CONSIDERATION FOR THE CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN INDEBTEDNESS OWED BY NBC TO THE COMPANY. /__/ FOR /__/ AGAINST /__/ ABSTAIN ^ 3. TO APPROVE ^ AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY'S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION ^(THE "CERTIFICATE") CHANGING THE NAME OF THE COMPANY TO MASTEC INC.
PRER14A2nd Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 2nd
/__/ FOR /__/ AGAINST /__/ ABSTAIN ^ 4. TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE CERTIFICATE INCREASING THE TOTAL NUMBER OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK WHICH THE COMPANY IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE FROM 25,000,000 TO 50,000,000. /__/ FOR /__/ AGAINST /__/ ABSTAIN ^ 5. TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE CERTIFICATE TO ELIMINATE ALL DESIGNATIONS, POWERS, PREFERENCES, RIGHTS, QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS PRESCRIBED IN THE CERTIFICATE RELATING TO THE 5,000,000 SHARES OF PREFERRED STOCK AUTHORIZED BY THE CERTIFICATE AND WHICH MAY IN THE FUTURE BE ISSUED BY THE COMPANY. /__/ FOR /__/ AGAINST /__/ ABSTAIN 6. TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE CERTIFICATE TO ADOPT THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 102(b)(7) OF THE DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW ("DGCL") RELATING TO THE LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS. /__/ FOR /__/ AGAINST /__/ ABSTAIN 7. TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE CERTIFICATE TO BROADEN THE CORPORATE POWERS OF THE COMPANY TO MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY THE DGCL AND MAKE CERTAIN OTHER CLARIFICATIONS TO THE CERTIFICATE. /__/ FOR /__/ AGAINST /__/ ABSTAIN 8. TO APPROVE THE COMPANY'S 1994 STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS.
PRER14A3rd Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 3rd
/__/ FOR /__/ AGAINST /__/ ABSTAIN 9. TO APPROVE THE COMPANY'S 1994 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN. /__/ FOR /__/ AGAINST /__/ ABSTAIN AS A CONDITION TO THE CONSUMMATION OF THE ACQUISITION, THE STOCKHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE APPROVED EACH OF THE FOREGOING AMENDMENTS TO THE CERTIFICATE, PROPOSED BY THE STOCKHOLDERS OF CT AND CTF. IF EACH OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE CERTIFICATE ARE NOT APPROVED BY THE REQUISITE NUMBER OF STOCKHOLDER VOTES, THE ACQUISITION MAY NOT BE EFFECTED EVEN IF THE TERMS OF THE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT ARE APPROVED BY THE STOCKHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY. ADDITIONALLY, THE PROPOSALS TO (i) APPROVE THE AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY'S CERTIFICATE, (ii) APPROVE THE COMPANY'S 1994 STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS AND (iii) APPROVE THE COMPANY'S 1994 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN ARE CONDITIONED UPON THE APPROVAL OF THE TERMS OF THE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT. ACCORDINGLY, IF THE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT IS NOT APPROVED, THESE PROPOSALS, EVEN IF APPROVED BY THE STOCKHOLDERS, WILL NOT BE EFFECTED. THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED, "FOR" PROPOSALS 1 THROUGH ^ 9, AND WILL BE VOTED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES ON ANY OTHER MATTER THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING. Dated ___________________________, 199^
PRER14A4th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 4th
___________________________________________ Signature _________________________________________^ Signature if held jointly Please sign exactly as name appears opposite. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by President or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person. PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY PROMPTLY USING ENCLOSED ENVELOPE^
PRER14A5th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 5th
^ NOTICE OF ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS - BURNUP & SIMS INC. TIME: _________ [a.m./p.m.] (___________) DATE: February ^, 1994 PLACE: _________________________________ _________________________________ At the Annual and Special Meeting of Stockholders of Burnup & Sims Inc. (the "Company"), and any adjournments or postponements thereof (the "Meeting"), the following proposals are on the agenda for action by the stockholders: . To elect one director to serve as a Class II director. .To approve the terms of an Agreement, dated as of October 15, 1993^, by and among the Company, and the stockholders of Church & Tower, Inc., a Florida corporation ("CT"), and Church & Tower of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation ("CTF"), as amended ^, pursuant to which, among other things, (i) the Company will acquire (the "Acquisition") all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of CT and CTF in exchange for 10,250,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock, par value $.10 per share ("Common Stock") ^ and (ii) immediately thereafter, the Company will redeem 3,153,847 shares of Common Stock owned by National Beverage Corp. ("NBC") in consideration for the cancellation of certain indebtedness owed by NBC to the Company. .To approve ^ an amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation (the "Certificate") changing the name of the Company to MasTec Inc. .To approve ^ an amendment to the Certificate increasing the total number of shares of Common Stock which the Company is authorized to issue from 25,000,000 to 50,000,000.
PRER14A6th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 6th
.To approve an amendment to the Certificate to eliminate all designations, powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions prescribed in the Certificate relating to the 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized by the Certificate and which may in the future be issued by the Company. .To approve an amendment to the Certificate to adopt the provisions of Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law ("DGCL") relating to the liability of directors. .To approve an amendment to the Certificate to broaden the corporate powers of the Company to the maximum extent permitted by the DGCL and make certain other clarifications to the Certificate. .To approve the Company's ^ 1994 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors. .To approve the Company's 1994 Stock Incentive Plan. .To transact such other business as may properly come before the Meeting. Upon consummation of the Acquisition and the transactions contemplated thereby, the former stockholders of CT and CTF will own approximately 65% of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company. Accordingly, to the extent they act in concert, the former stockholders of CT and CTF will have the ability to control the affairs of the Company and control the election of the Company's directors regardless of how the other stockholders may vote. Furthermore, such persons will have the ability to control other actions requiring stockholder approval, including certain fundamental corporate transactions such as a merger or sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company, regardless of how the other stockholder may vote. This ability may be enhanced by the adoption of the proposed amendments to the Certificate, including those which would (i) increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from twenty-five million (25,000,000) to fifty million (50,000,000) and (ii) eliminate all designations, powers,
PRER14A7th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 7th
preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions in the Certificate relating to the Company's preferred stock. These proposed amendments to the Certificate may be deemed to have the effect of making more difficult the acquisition of control of the Company after the consummation of the Acquisition by means of a hostile tender offer, open market purchases, a proxy contest or otherwise. On the one hand, these amendments may be seen as encouraging persons seeking to acquire control of the Company to initiate such an acquisition through arm's length negotiations with the Company; on the other hand, the amendments may have the effect of discouraging a third party from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of the Company, even though such an attempt may be economically beneficial to the Company and its stockholders. Furthermore, the proposed amendments to the Certificate and the fact that the CT and CTF stockholders will own approximately 65% of the Common Stock after the consummation of the Acquisition and the transactions contemplated thereby may have a negative effect on the market price and liquidity of the Common Stock. Only holders of record of Common Stock of the Company at the close of business on ^, 1994 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting. A complete list of the stockholders entitled to vote at the Meeting will be open to examination by any stockholder, for any proper purpose, during ordinary business hours for a period of ten days prior to the Meeting at the corporate offices of the Company at One North University Drive, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33324. This list will also be kept at the Meeting and may be inspected by any stockholder present. A Proxy Statement, setting forth certain additional information, and the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1933 ^ and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended ^ October 31, 1993, accompany this Notice of Annual and Special Meeting. ^ All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Meeting in person. Please complete and return the proxy in the enclosed envelope addressed to the Company, since a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at the Meeting must be represented at the Meeting in order to transact business. Stockholders have the power to revoke any such
PRER14A8th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 8th
proxy at any time before it is voted and the giving of such proxy will not affect the right to vote in person if the Meeting is attended. Your vote is important. By Order of the Board of Directors, Nick A. Caporella Chairman of the Board of Directors President and Chief Executive Officer __________________, ^ 1994 Fort Lauderdale, Florida
PRER14A9th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 9th
ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF BURNUP & SIMS INC. ____________________ PROXY STATEMENT ___________________ This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors (the "Board of Directors") of Burnup & Sims Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Burnup & Sims" or the "Company"), of proxies from the holders of the Company's Common Stock, par value $.10 per share (the "Common Stock"), for use at the 1993 Annual and Special Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held at the ________________, ______________ on ^, 1994 at ____ [a.m./p.m.], ______________ time and any adjournments or postponements thereof (the "Meeting"). The approximate date on which this Proxy Statement and the enclosed form of proxy are first being sent to stockholders is ____________, ^ 1994. Stockholders should review the information provided herein in conjunction with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1993 (the "Annual Report"), and the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the ^ six months ended ^ October 31, 1993 which accompany this Proxy Statement. INFORMATION CONCERNING PROXY The giving of a proxy does not preclude the right to vote in person should any stockholder giving the proxy so desire. The mailing address of the principal executive offices of the Company is P.O. Box 15070, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33318. A stockholder who gives a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is exercised, either in person at the Meeting or by filing with Ms. Margaret M. Madden, Vice President and Corporate Secretary of the Company, at the address of the executive offices set forth above, a written revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date than the date of the proxy being revoked. The cost of preparing, assembling and mailing this Proxy Statement, the Notice of Annual and Special Meeting of Stockholders and the enclosed proxy will be borne by the 1
PRER14A10th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 10th
Company. In addition to the use of mail, officers, directors and employees of the Company may solicit proxies personally and by telephone. The Company's officers, directors and employees will receive no compensation for soliciting proxies other than their regular salaries. The Company has ^ retained Hill & Knowlton to assist in soliciting proxies for use at the Meeting ^ for an aggregate fee of $8,000 plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. The Company may request banks, brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward copies of the proxy material to the beneficial owners on whose behalf they are holding shares of Common Stock and to request authority for the execution of proxies. The Company may reimburse such persons for their expenses in so doing. PURPOSES OF THE MEETING At the Meeting, the Company's stockholders will consider and vote upon the following matters: 1. The election of one member to the Company's Board of Directors to serve as a Class II director. 2. The approval of the terms of an Agreement, dated as of October 15, 1993 ^ by and among the Company and the stockholders of Church & Tower, Inc., a Florida corporation ("CT"), and Church & Tower of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation ("CTF"), as amended ^(the "Acquisition Agreement"), pursuant to which, among other things, (i) the Company will acquire all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of CT and CTF (collectively, the "CT and CTF Shares") in exchange for 10,250,000 shares of Common Stock (the "Burnup Shares"), and (ii) immediately thereafter, the Company will redeem 3,153,847 shares of Common Stock owed by National Beverage Corp. ("NBC") in consideration for the cancellation of certain indebtedness owed by NBC to the Company. The acquisition of CT and CTF by the Company pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition Agreement is sometimes herein referred to as the "Acquisition".^ 3. The approval of an amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation (the "Certificate") changing the name of the Company to MasTec Inc. 2
PRER14A11th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 11th
4. The approval of an amendment to the Certificate increasing the total number of shares of Common Stock which the Company is authorized to issue from 25,000,000 to 50,000,000. 5. The approval of an amendment to the Certificate to eliminate all designations, powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions prescribed in the Certificate relating to the 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized by the Certificate and which may in the future be issued by the Company. 6. The approval of an amendment to the Certificate to adopt the provisions of Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the "DGCL") relating to the liability of directors. 7. The approval of an amendment to the Certificate to broaden the corporate powers of the Company to the maximum extent permitted by the DGCL and make certain other clarifications to the Certificate. 8. The approval of the Company's ^ 1994 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors. 9. The approval of the Company's ^ 1994 Stock Incentive Plan. 10. The transaction of such other business as may properly come before the Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. As a condition to the consummation of the Acquisition, the stockholders of the Company are required to have approved ^ each of the foregoing amendments to ^ the Certificate, proposed by the stockholders of CT and CTF. If each of the proposed amendments to the Certificate are not approved by the requisite number of stockholder votes, the Acquisition may not be effected even if the terms of the Acquisition Agreement are approved by the 3
PRER14A12th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 12th
stockholders of the Company. Additionally, the proposals to (i) approve such amendments to the Company's Certificate, (ii) approve the Company's ^ 1994 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors and (iii) approve the Company's ^ 1994 Stock Incentive Plan are conditioned upon the approval of the terms of the Acquisition Agreement. Accordingly, if the Acquisition Agreement is not approved, these proposals, even if approved by the stockholders, will not be effected. Unless a stockholder otherwise specifies therein, all shares represented by valid proxies will be voted FOR the election as director of the Company of the person named under the caption "Election of Director," FOR the adoption of the Acquisition Agreement, FOR each of the amendments to the Company's Certificate, FOR approval of the Company's ^ 1994 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors and FOR approval of the Company's ^ 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, and will be voted at the discretion of the proxies on any other matter that may properly come before the Meeting. Where a stockholder has specified how a proxy is to be voted, it will be voted accordingly. The Board of Directors does not know of any action to be taken at the Meeting other than the foregoing. 4
PRER14A13th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 13th
SUMMARY OF THE ACQUISITION AND RELATED MATTERS The following is a summary of certain information contained in this Proxy Statement concerning the Acquisition and matters related thereto. This summary is provided for your convenience, should not be considered complete, and is qualified in its entirety by the detailed discussions contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, the Financial Statements and Notes thereto included herein or incorporated by reference herein and by reference to the Acquisition Agreement, ^ a copy of which is attached hereto as Appendix A. Certain terms which are used in this Proxy Statement are defined in the summary. THE COMPANY'S STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO READ THE ENTIRE PROXY STATEMENT CAREFULLY, INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES HERETO AND ALL DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. The Company. The Company is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware with its principal offices located at One North University Drive, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33324. Where appropriate, the term the Company shall mean and include Burnup & Sims Inc. and its subsidiaries. The Company's telephone number is (305) 587-4512. The Company was founded in 1929 and currently provides a wide range of cable design, installation and maintenance services to telephone, CATV and utility services throughout the United States. These services are rendered through various subsidiary companies located principally in California, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina and Texas. In addition, the Company is one of ^ three major manufacturers of power supplies for the CATV industry, operates a motion picture theater chain in the southeastern U.S. and also provides commercial printing and graphic arts services. CT and CTF. CT and CTF provide a broad range of services to the telecommunications industry and are engaged in ^ providing construction ^ and design ^ services to government and industry, in South Florida. CTF is principally involved in providing engineering, construction and maintenance services to local utility companies under master contracts. CT is a subcontractor of CTF and engages in selected construction projects in the public and private sectors. CT and CTF are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the "CT Group." See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. - Background on CT and CTF." 5
PRER14A14th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 14th
The Proposed Acquisition. Pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, the Company will acquire the CT and CTF Shares in exchange for 10,250,000 shares of Common Stock issued to the present stockholders of CT and CTF. As a result of the Acquisition, CT and CTF will become wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. The Acquisition will become effective on the business day immediately following receipt of stockholder approval and satisfaction or waiver of all other conditions set forth in the Acquisition Agreement (the "Closing Date" or the "Closing"). See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC - Terms of Acquisition Agreement." Change of Control. As a result of transactions contemplated by and in connection with the Acquisition, the present stockholders of CT and CTF will ^ own approximately ^ 65% of the Common Stock outstanding immediately after the Acquisition and ^ the transactions contemplated thereby. See "MANAGEMENT-Proposed Directors and Executive Officers". To the extent such persons act in concert, they will be controlling stockholders of the Company and will have the ability to control the election of the Company's directors and certain fundamental corporate transactions regardless of how the other stockholders may vote. See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. - Certain Effects of the Acquisition - Change of Control". Requirements for Stockholder Approval. The ^ listing requirements of The National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System ("NASDAQ") require stockholder approval of any ^ transaction, such as the Acquisition, in which the issuer proposes to issue new shares of a listed class of securities constituting 20% or more of the outstanding shares of such class prior to the date of issuance. The Burnup Shares will constitute ^ approximately 65% of the outstanding Common Stock following consummation of the Acquisition and the transactions contemplated thereby. Accordingly, it is a condition to the consummation of the Acquisition that holders of a majority of the outstanding Common Stock approve the terms of the Acquisition Agreement. The terms of the Acquisition Agreement were reviewed and approved by the ^ Special Transaction Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Special Transaction Committee") ^ on behalf of the stockholders of the Company (other than NBC and its affiliates). See "MANAGEMENT - Meetings and Committees of Board of Directors" for the names of the members of the Special Transaction Committee ^ and the functions of such committee. The vote of a majority of the unaffiliated stockholders of 6
PRER14A15th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 15th
the Company is not required to approve the Acquisition Agreement. NBC, which currently holds approximately 36% of the shares of outstanding Common Stock, will vote in connection with the proposal to approve the Acquisition Agreement. A vote in favor of the Acquisition ^ Agreement may preclude a stockholder of the Company from challenging the Acquisition and the other transactions described in this Proxy Statement and from participating in, and receiving damages, if any, as a result of any action which has been or may be filed on behalf of any or all of the stockholders with respect to such transactions. See "CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS AND LITIGATION" for a description of a class action and derivative complaint relating to, among other things, the Acquisition Agreement and certain other transactions described in this Proxy Statement. On November 16, 1993, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the Acquisition. ^ The Redemption. The Acquisition Agreement provides ^ as a condition to the consummation of the Acquisition by the stockholders of CT and CTF and the Company that (i) the Company shall have entered into a written agreement with NBC ^ pursuant to which the Company ^ shall have agreed to redeem 3,153,847 shares of Common Stock owned by NBC ^(the "Redemption", together with the Acquisition, the "Transaction"), (ii) all of the conditions to the consummation of the Redemption shall have been satisfied or waived, except the condition requiring consummation of the Acquisition, and (iii) the stockholders of CT and CTF shall have received a written certificate from the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company that all of the conditions to the consummation of the Redemption shall have been satisfied or waived, except the condition to the Redemption that the Acquisition shall have occurred, which certificate shall be supported by a certificate from the Chief Executive Officer of NBC, to the same effect. Accordingly, the Acquisition will be consummated prior to the Redemption. The Redemption was negotiated and approved by the Special Transaction Committee on behalf of the stockholders of the Company (other than NBC and its affiliates). The Redemption will not be consummated unless the Acquisition shall have occurred. Accordingly, assuming satisfaction of all other conditions to the consummation of the Acquisition, approval by stockholders of the Acquisition Agreement shall result in consummation of the Redemption. The consideration for the Redemption will be the cancellation of the outstanding principal of $17,500,000 of a 14% Subordinated Debenture (the "Subordinated Debenture") owed to the Company by NBC and ^ crediting the next succeeding principal payments in the amount of $592,313 of a promissory note with an outstanding principal amount of ^ $1,371,430 owed to the Company by NBC (the "Other Indebtedness"). Nick A. Caporella, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company is also the Chairman of the Board of Directors, 7
PRER14A16th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 16th
President, Chief Executive Officer and controlling stockholder of NBC. On November 16, 1993, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the Redemption. The Board of Directors of NBC has not yet met to consider the terms of the Redemption. See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. - Interest of Certain Persons in Matters to be Acted Upon^", and CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS AND LITIGATION." Fairness Opinion. The Special Transaction Committee has retained PaineWebber Incorporated ("PaineWebber") as a financial advisor in connection with the Acquisition and the transactions contemplated thereby to render an opinion to the Special Transaction Committee as to the fairness from a financial point of view of the Transaction. On November 16, 1993, representatives of PaineWebber advised the Special Transaction Committee of its valuation analysis and indicated that they were not aware of any facts on such date that would preclude such representatives from recommending to PaineWebber's fairness opinion committee that on such date, the Transaction is fair, from a financial point of view to the Company and the holders of Common Stock other than NBC and its affiliates. On January 18, 1994, PaineWebber delivered their written opinion which is attached hereto as Appendix B indicating that each of the Acquisition, Redemption and Transaction is fair, from a financial point of view to the Company and the holders of Common Stock, other than NBC and its affiliates. The opinion of PaineWebber sets forth the assumptions made, the matters considered and the scope of the review. PaineWebber will reaffirm its opinion immediately prior to the Meeting. See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. - Report and Opinion of Financial Advisor." Outstanding Stock Options. Pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, the Company is required to take all necessary action to cause the acceleration, in certain instances, of the vesting periods of options and rights to elect alternative settlement methods issued pursuant to the Company's 1976 Stock Option Plan and 1978 Stock Option Plan. See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. -Certain Effects of the Acquisition -- Outstanding Stock Options." Conditions to Acquisition. There are a number of conditions which must be satisfied prior to or simultaneous with the Acquisition, including certain matters relating to the Redemption. See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. -Terms of the Acquisition Agreement -- Conditions of the Acquisition." 8
PRER14A17th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 17th
Reasons for the Acquisition. ^ In determining to recommend the approval of the Acquisition Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby to the Board of Directors, and in approving the Acquisition Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and recommending that stockholders approve and adopt the Acquisition Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, the Special Transaction Committee and the Board, respectively, considered and based their opinion as to the fairness of the transactions contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement, on a number of factors, including the following: (i) the belief of the Board and Special Transaction Committee that the combination of the Company, CT and CTF is an attractive business opportunity because the Company's financial condition, business prospects and senior management will be strengthened through the consummation of the Acquisition and greater economies of scale and synergies will be created through the Acquisition; (ii) the ^ belief of the Board and Special Transaction Committee that significant favorable recent developments are taking place in the domestic and international telecommunications industry and the combined entity will be better able to compete in the global marketplace; and (iii) the oral and written presentations and the written opinion of PaineWebber as to the fairness from a financial point of view of the ^ Transaction to the Company and the holders of Common Stock other than NBC and its affiliates. See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. - ^"Background of Transaction and Reasons for Engaging in the Acquisition." Directors and Management of the Company Following the Acquisition. The Acquisition Agreement provides that upon consummation of the Acquisition and the ^ transactions contemplated thereby, the Board of Directors will hold a meeting at which (i) Jorge Mas will be elected as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Board will determine his compensation and (ii) the size of the Board will be expanded from five to seven members. The directors intend to appoint Jorge L. Mas Canosa as a Class II director and Jorge Mas as a Class I director. Prior to the conducting of any other business at such meeting, Nick A. Caporella (a Class I Director) and Leo J. Hussey (a Class III Director) will resign from the Board of Directors. The remaining directors will appoint Eliot C. Abbott as a Class II Director and Arthur B. Laffer as a Class III Director to fill the resulting vacancies. Messrs. Mas Canosa and Mas are controlling stockholders of ^ CTF and ^ CT, respectively. See "MANAGEMENT -Proposed Directors and Executive Officers" and EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION - Report of Compensation and Stock Option Committee." 9
PRER14A18th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 18th
Appraisal Rights. The holders of Common Stock are not entitled to appraisal rights under Delaware law with respect to the Acquisition or any transactions contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement. Restrictions on Resales of Burnup Shares. The Burnup Shares received by the stockholders of ^ CT and CTF in connection with the Acquisition will be subject to certain restrictions on transfer. Pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, however, the Company has agreed, under certain circumstances, to register the Burnup Shares. See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH AND TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. - Terms of the Acquisition Agreement -- Registration Rights" and "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. -Restrictions on Resales of Burnup Shares to be Issued in the Acquisition." Indemnification. The Acquisition Agreement provides that in certain circumstances (i) the Company will indemnify and hold harmless CT, CTF and their respective stockholders ^ and (ii) the CT and CTF stockholders will indemnify and hold ^ harmless the Company, its subsidiaries and their respective officers and directors. The aggregate liability of the CT and CTF stockholders is limited to the sum of $1,000,000 plus the aggregate fair market value of 350,000 Burnup Shares on the date of payment. The Company's aggregate liability is limited to the sum of $2,500,000. The Acquisition Agreement also provides that at Closing the Company will enter into an Indemnification Agreement with certain current and former directors and officers of the Company pursuant to which the Company will be obligated to indemnify and hold harmless such directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law, subject to certain limitations, for a period of six years after Closing for all damages and costs which they suffer or incur by reason of the fact that they were or are a director or officer of the Company. See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH AND TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. ^- Terms of the Acquisition Agreement - Indemnification." Accounting Treatment. The Acquisition will be accounted for as a "purchase", as such term is used under generally accepted accounting principles, for accounting and financial reporting purposes. Because of certain factors, including the fact that the ^ stockholders of the CT Group will hold a majority of the Common Stock subsequent to the ^ Closing and that they or their designees will constitute a majority of the Board of Directors, it is anticipated that the Acquisition will be treated as a "reverse acquisition", with the CT 10
PRER14A19th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 19th
Group considered to be the acquiring entity. See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. - Certain Effects of the Acquisition -- Accounting Treatment." Certain Federal Income Tax Considerations. The stockholders of CT and CTF have received an opinion from Price Waterhouse ^ substantially to the effect that, on the basis of the facts in existence at the Closing Date, the Acquisition constitutes a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. - Certain Effects of the Acquisition -- Federal Income Tax Considerations." Other Approvals. The Acquisition is subject to the requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the "HSR Act"), and the rules and regulations thereunder. ^ On January 21, 1994, the Company and the CT Group made the necessary filings under the HSR Act with the Federal Trade Commission and Justice Department. Under the provisions of the HSR Act, the Acquisition ^ may not be consummated until ^ the thirty day waiting period expires, unless the request for early termination of the waiting period by the Company and the CT Group is granted. Additionally, under certain of the loan documents between the Company and its senior bank lender, and between the CT Group and its bank lender (which is the same as the Company's lender), the written consent of such ^ lender is required to consummate the Acquisition. Such lender has orally indicated to each of the Company and the CT Group that it intends to provide its written consent for consummation of the Acquisition, subject to certain conditions. The Company and the CT Group are not currently aware of any other material permits, approvals, consents or similar actions that are required for consummation of the Acquisition. Approval by CT and CTF Stockholders. The stockholders of each of CT and CTF have unanimously approved the Acquisition Agreement^. Amendments to the Company's Certificate. As a condition to the consummation of the Acquisition, the Company is required to have approved certain amendments to ^ the Certificate proposed by the ^ CT Group. See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY'S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION." The affirmative votes of the holders of a majority 11
PRER14A20th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 20th
of the outstanding Common Stock will be required for approval of ^ each amendment to the Certificate. The proposed amendments to the Certificate are contingent upon the consummation of the Acquisition and, as such, will not be effected unless the terms of the Acquisition Agreement are approved at the Meeting. The Proposal to Approve the Company's ^ 1994 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors. The CT and CTF stockholders have proposed, subject to approval by the Board of Directors and the holders of the Common Stock, the ^ 1994 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the "Directors' Plan"). ^ There will be 400,000 shares of Common Stock ^ reserved for issuance pursuant to the Directors' Plan. The members of the Special Transaction Committee have agreed not to participate in the Directors' Plan. See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE 1994 STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS." The Proposal to Approve ^ 1994 Stock Incentive Plan. The CT and CTF stockholders have proposed, subject to approval by the Board of Directors and the holders of Common Stock ^, the ^ 1994 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Incentive Plan") for key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries to replace the existing 1976 Stock Option Plan (the "Current Plan"). ^ There will be 800,000 shares of Common Stock ^ reserved for issuance pursuant to the Incentive Plan. See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ^ 1994 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN." Operations Following the Acquisition. Following consummation of the Acquisition, each of CT and CTF will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Other than as described herein, it is the present intention of the CT and CTF stockholders to operate the Company under their present names and related trade names in substantially the same manner following consummation of the Acquisition as currently being operated. The proposed Board of Directors will, upon consummation of the Acquisition, review additional information about the Company and, upon completion of such review, may develop or propose plans which may result in changes in the operations of the Company. See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. - Operations Following the Acquisition." 12
PRER14A21st Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 21st
PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. General ^ A copy of the Acquisition Agreement ^ is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A and incorporated herein by reference. The following summary of the material terms of the Acquisition Agreement, and the potential consequences thereof does not purport to be complete. The discussion of the Acquisition Agreement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the Acquisition Agreement. The Company's stockholders are urged to read the entire proxy statement carefully, including all appendices hereto and all documents incorporated herein by reference. The Closing under the Acquisition Agreement will occur on the business day immediately following receipt of stockholder approval and satisfaction or waiver of all other conditions set forth in the Acquisition Agreement. As a result, each of CT and CTF will become wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company and the former stockholders of CT and CTF will own approximately ^ 65% of the outstanding Common Stock after giving effect to the Acquisition and the transactions contemplated thereby and, to the extent they act in concert, will be controlling stockholders of the Company. See " - Certain Effects of the Acquisition - Change in Control". The ^ listing requirements of NASDAQ require stockholder approval of any acquisition transaction in which the issuer proposes to issue new shares of a listed class of securities constituting 20% or more of the outstanding shares of such class prior to the date of issuance. The Burnup Shares will constitute 65% of the outstanding Common Stock following consummation of the Acquisition and the transactions contemplated thereby. Accordingly, it is a condition to the Acquisition that holders of a majority of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company approve the terms of the Acquisition Agreement. The terms of the Acquisition Agreement were reviewed and approved by the Special Transaction Committee on behalf of the stockholders of the Company (other than NBC and its affiliates). The vote of a majority of the unaffiliated stockholders of the Company is not 13
PRER14A22nd Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 22nd
required to approve the Acquisition Agreement. NBC, which currently holds approximately 36% of the shares of outstanding Common Stock, will vote in connection with the proposal to approve the Acquisition Agreement. A vote in favor of the Acquisition Agreement may preclude a stockholder of the Company from challenging the Acquisition and the other transactions described in this Proxy Statement and from participating in, and receiving damages, if any, as a result of any action which has been or may be filed on behalf of any or all of the stockholders with respect to such transactions. See "CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS AND LITIGATION" for a description of a class action and derivative complaint relating to, among other things, the Acquisition Agreement and certain other transactions described in this Proxy Statement. Background ^ of CT and CTF CTF was incorporated under the laws of Florida in 1968. Since 1969, CTF has performed engineering, construction and maintenance services on behalf of Southern Bell, an affiliate of BellSouth, pursuant to master contracts covering outside plant work. CTF currently holds three such master contracts, expiring at various times through 1996, for Dade County and south Broward County, Florida. The revenues generated under such contracts constitute approximately 70% of its total combined revenues. CTF also provides construction and maintenance services under individual contracts to local utilities, including the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department. CT was incorporated under the laws of Florida in 1990 to engage in selected construction projects in the public and private sectors. In 1990, a joint venture (the "9001 Joint Venture") of which CT is the majority partner was established for the purpose of constructing a detention facility in Dade County with a capacity of approximately 2,500 beds which was completed in 1993. In September, 1990, CT entered into a joint venture (the "OCT Joint Venture") of which CT is a 20% minority partner with ^ Constructora Norberto Odebrecht, an international construction contractor, to construct governmental projects. The OCT Joint Venture has completed the Brickell Extension Project of the City of Miami's Metro Mover, an elevated transportation system, and has begun construction of a landfill in south Dade County. In May 1992, CT merged with Communication Contractors, Inc., an affiliate of CTF engaged primarily in providing manpower and equipment to CTF. Since the merger, work under the Southern Bell master contracts has been subcontracted to CT. The principal offices of 14
PRER14A23rd Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 23rd
CT and CTF are located at 10441 S.W. 187th Street, Miami, Florida 33157 and their telephone number is (305) 233-6540. ^ Background of Transaction The acquisition by the Company of CT and CTF represents the culmination of the Company's efforts to implement a transactional solution to the operational and strategic challenges resulting from the impact of the recession on the Company's core operations. The recent recession resulted in the deferral or cancellation of construction projects and a general contraction in the market for the services comprising the Company's core business. The Company believed that while it had adequate resources to participate in renewed growth in the market expected to occur following the recession's anticipated end, its ability to participate in that growth would be enhanced if it combined with a strategic partner. It was the Company's view that an appropriate partner would be one which conducted substantial business in the telecommunications services industry, had strong operational management and a history of positive operating results. The Company's management and Board recognized that the search for a strategic partner would have to be conducted with sensitivity to the possible detrimental effects that such a search could have on the Company's core business. In February 1992, the Company announced that it had entered into an agreement with certain stockholders of Dycom Industries, Inc. ("Dycom"), a company engaged in the telecommunications industry, pursuant to which, among other things, ^ the Company acquired an option to purchase approximately 9.9% of the outstanding common stock of Dycom. At the time, the Company was seeking to effect a merger or business combination with Dycom. The Company believed that the combined entity would result in cost saving efficiencies that would enhance earnings. Over the course of the next few months, representatives of the Company unsuccessfully attempted to commence discussions with members of senior management of Dycom, as well as its Board of Directors. On December 3, 1992, the Company announced that the agreement had expired pursuant to its terms. 15
PRER14A24th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 24th
^ In August 1992, after numerous attempts to negotiate with Dycom had failed, a meeting of the Special Transaction Committee of the Board of Directors was held to consider alternatives in light of the decline in profitability. The members of the Special Transaction Committee are Messrs. Conlee, Morse and Hathorn. During the course of the meeting, representatives of PaineWebber discussed with members of the Committee a variety of alternatives to enhance shareholder value, including a merger, sale of all or substantially all of the assets or other business combination. In addition, the Committee discussed the lack of any expression of interest by third parties to engage in a business combination with the Company in spite of the Company's public announcements that it was seeking to effect such a transaction. The difficulty of managing the Company's business during any attempt to seek strategic partners was also discussed. Prior to conclusion of the meeting, the Special Transaction Committee requested PaineWebber to prepare a proposal for the Committee's review with respect to engaging PaineWebber as financial advisor in connection with the sale or merger of the Company. In October 1992, the Board of Directors of the Company ^ held a meeting to discuss the engagement of PaineWebber by the Special Transaction Committee to explore strategic alternatives for the Company, including the sale of part or all of the Company. Although PaineWebber was not formally engaged by the Special Transaction Committee, PaineWebber reflected upon strategic merger and acquisition alternatives and attempted to identify likely candidates for merger, joint ventures and/or partners for all or part of the Company. While PaineWebber considered certain companies as potential candidates, preliminary analysis and efforts by PaineWebber led it to conclude that there was a very low likelihood of effecting a transaction with any such candidates. In the course of its activities, PaineWebber noted that the impact of the economic recession on the industry of which the Company is a part substantially reduced the likelihood of successfully concluding a transaction, both because of effects of that recession on the Company's performance and the effects of the recession on potential other parties to a transaction. In addition, the interrelationship between the Company and NBC increased the difficulty of effecting a transaction. In April 1993, representatives of the Company were contacted by Jorge Mas, President of CT, who expressed an interest in meeting with the Company to discuss a possible business combination with the Company. From late April 1993 through July 1993, Nick A. Caporella, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, met with 16
PRER14A25th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 25th
representatives of the CT Group and discussed in conceptual terms the possibility of such a transaction. At these meetings, which were informal and general in nature, various structural possibilities pursuant to which the companies could be combined were explored. On July 10, 1993, a meeting of the Strategic Planning Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (which includes the members of the Special Transaction Committee) was held. The members of the Committee, who had been advised from time to time of the discussions with CT Group prior to the meeting, were informed of the nature of the business of CT and CTF, their management and financial results and the impact an acquisition would have on the operations of the Company. Mr. Caporella informed the members of the Strategic Planning Committee of the discussions he had held with representatives of the CT Group and explored with the members of the Committee the possibility of a business combination transaction. Mr. Caporella also advised the Committee that the CT Group indicated that it may require that the repurchase of the Company's stock held by NBC be a condition to any such acquisition. Mr. Caporella also noted that a likely result of the transaction would be that the stockholders of the CT Group would become significant stockholders of the Company. Mr. Caporella also indicated that in light of a condition requiring repurchase of Common Stock from NBC, the terms of any such transaction would require the review and approval of the Special Transaction Committee of the Board of Directors. Mr. Caporella further indicated that stockholder approval would be required for such an acquisition in accordance with the rules of NASDAQ. The Strategic Planning Committee then discussed the various alternatives available to the Company, including the lack of any viable alternatives which could maximize shareholder value, such as a recapitalization, extraordinary dividend, or sale of assets to other third parties. The Committee noted that previous attempts to find a buyer for the Company were unsuccessful and that a recapitalization or extraordinary dividend could not be effectuated in light of the losses being reported by the Company, the effect such a transaction would have on the Company's cash flow and the inability of the Company to obtain sufficient borrowings to fund such transactions. At the conclusion of the meeting, the Committee determined that Mr. Caporella should hold further meetings with the CT Group and report his progress to the Committee or the full Board at a later date. From late July through mid August 1993, the parties and their respective advisers negotiated the terms of a letter agreement (the "Letter Agreement"). On August 18, 1993, a meeting was held among representatives of the Company and the stockholders of the CT Group and their advisors at which time the Letter Agreement was executed. The Letter Agreement 17
PRER14A26th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 26th
provided a format to proceed forward with a possible transaction pursuant to which the stockholders of the CT Group would exchange the CT and CTF Shares for shares of Common Stock of the Company and contained a number of conditions, including satisfactory completion of due diligence, an agreement as to the number of shares of Common Stock to be issued in the Acquisition, the requirement by the CT Group that the ownership by NBC of Common Stock of the Company be reduced or eliminated on terms acceptable to the Company and the stockholders of the CT Group and approval of the transaction by the stockholders and Board of Directors of the Company. During the meeting, the parties also discussed the due diligence process, regulatory requirements and fiduciary obligations applicable to such a transaction. Effective August 1, 1993, PaineWebber was retained by the Special Transaction Committee for the purpose of acting as its financial adviser to render an opinion with respect to the terms of the Acquisition. See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. - Report and Opinion of Financial Advisor." In September 1993, representatives of the Company and the CT Group commenced negotiations of the terms of the Agreement. Various issues regarding the structure of the transaction, indemnification obligations, conditions to the transaction and other material terms of the Agreement were discussed and reviewed. In September 1993, representatives of PaineWebber met with management of the Company and management of the CT Group to review the respective businesses, operations and prospects of each of the Company, CT and CTF. Thereafter, numerous discussions were held among PaineWebber, the Company and CT Group with respect to the financial results of each company. On September 20, 1993, a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company was held to discuss the status of the negotiations with the CT Group as well as financial due diligence . During the meeting, representatives of PaineWebber, at the request of the Special Transaction Committee, provided an overview of the due diligence that had been conducted to date by PaineWebber. The Committee also held lengthy discussions concerning the negotiations that had taken place to date with respect to the terms of the transaction. The Board discussed the desire to promptly pursue negotiations with representatives of the CT 18
PRER14A27th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 27th
Group and the need to engage in negotiations which would result in the most favorable transaction for shareholders of the Company. The Board noted that the initial negotiations were held between management of each company and concluded that engaging outside advisors to negotiate the transaction would only increase the costs and length of time to complete the transaction and negatively impact the relationship which had been established between the managements of each Company. The Board authorized management of the Company, in consultation with the advisors to the Special Transaction Committee, to proceed forward with its negotiations based upon the matters discussed at the meeting and to review with the Board the final terms of the Acquisition Agreement prior to its execution. Subsequent to this meeting, the Special Transaction Committee engaged outside counsel to represent it in connection with the transaction. On September 23, 1993, the Company issued a press release announcing its negotiations with the CT Group. The high and low sales prices for the Common Stock as quoted on NASDAQ as of September 22, 1993 were $3.25 and $3.00, respectively. ^ On October 18, 1993, a meeting of the Board of Directors was held to discuss the terms of the Acquisition Agreement ^ and other related matters. During the meeting, the Board reviewed the terms of the Acquisition Agreement as well as the financial results of the CT Group. The Board also discussed the number of shares of Common Stock that would be issued by the Company to the stockholders of the CT Group, including the fact that the CT Group had made known its intentions to be a significant shareholder following consummation of the Acquisition and the transactions contemplated thereby. ^ Later that day, a meeting of the Special Transaction Committee was held for the purpose of reviewing the terms of the Acquisition ^ Agreement and for representatives of PaineWebber to present its preliminary valuation analysis. During the meeting, PaineWebber reviewed for the Committee its financial analysis, including background, operating and financial information of the Company and the CT Group, based upon various valuation analyses. PaineWebber advised the Committee that, subject to completion of its due diligence, the CT Group would have a preliminary range of value between approximately $45 million to $55 million, depending upon the amount of the distribution the CT Group makes to 19
PRER14A28th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 28th
its stockholders prior to closing the Acquisition for previously taxed earnings not distributed to such stockholders. In addition, the Committee was informed by PaineWebber that a preliminary range of value for the shares of the Company's Common Stock was between $4.50 to $6.00 per share. For information concerning the analysis undertaken by PaineWebber see "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. - Report and Opinion of Financial Advisor." It was also noted that since September 23, 1993, the date negotiations with the CT Group were publicly disclosed, no offers or expressions of interest had been received by the Company from other third parties with respect to a potential business combination or other significant transaction. The Committee also discussed the manner in which to negotiate the exchange ratio with the CT Group. The Committee indicated that the exchange ratio should be arrived at based upon an agreed upon valuation for the CT Group and the percentage of stock to be held by the stockholders of the CT Group following the Acquisition. PaineWebber advised the Committee that, based upon its preliminary analysis approximately 56% to 67% of the outstanding Common Stock could be held by the stockholders of the CT Group following the Acquisition and the transactions contemplated thereby. This analysis was based upon the relative values of the Company and the CT Group utilizing various valuation analyses. The Committee authorized Mr. Caporella to negotiate the terms of the exchange ratio with representatives of the CT Group within the parameters discussed by the Committee and in consultation with the members of the Special Transaction Committee and its legal and financial advisors. The Committee required that the exchange ratio for purposes of the Redemption would not be negotiated unless and until an agreement was reached with the CT Group. See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. - Report and Opinion of Financial Advisor." ^ The Committee also reviewed the terms of the Acquisition Agreement ^ with its special counsel. The Committee reviewed the overall structure of the transaction and certain material terms of the Acquisition Agreement, including: (i) the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding and the requirement that the memoranda to be executed prior to approval of the Acquisition Agreement, (ii) the provisions permitting the Board to review other proposals received by the Company with respect to an acquisition proposal, (iii) the right to terminate the Acquisition Agreement without the Company being liable for "break-up" fees in excess of $500,000, (iv) the requirement for stockholder approval and delivery of a 20
PRER14A29th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 29th
fairness opinion from PaineWebber, and (v) the fact that the Redemption would not occur unless and until the Acquisition was consummated. After conclusion of the meeting of the Special Transaction Committee, a reconvened meeting of the Board of Directors was held. During the meeting, the Special Transaction Committee updated the Board concerning the discussions held at the Special Transaction Committee meeting. After discussing the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, ^ the Board approved the execution of the Memorandum of Understanding and the Acquisition Agreement, subject to a number of conditions, including satisfactory conclusion of the negotiation of the valuation of the CT Group and the number of shares of Common Stock ^ to be issued by the Company, approval by the stockholders and Special Transaction Committee of the Company and receipt of a written fairness opinion from PaineWebber. ^ On October 19, 1993, the Company, CT and CTF issued a press release announcing the execution ^ of the Acquisition Agreement. The high and low sales price for the Common Stock as quoted on NASDAQ as of October 18, 1993, was $4.00 and $3.75^, respectively. ^ Pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, the parties completed their respective due diligence by November 1, 1993. ^ During the period from late October 1993 through November 4, 1993, representatives of the parties engaged in lengthy negotiations concerning the relative values of the Company and the CT Group for the purpose of determining the number of shares of Common Stock to be owned by the CT Group following consummation of the Acquisition and the transactions contemplated thereby. During this period, there were differing views regarding the proper relative valuations of the Company and the CT Group. On November 4, 1993, the Company and CT Group reached an agreement pursuant to which 10,250,000 shares of Common Stock would be exchanged for the CT and CTF Shares. In addition, in light of the fact that the CT Group would no longer be afforded Subchapter S status under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, an aggregate distribution of $11.5 million in the form of cash and notes would be made to the stockholders of the CT Group for undistributed earnings on which the stockholders of the CT Group had paid income taxes (a portion of which distribution was made during the period ended September 30, 1993). In a press release issued on November 5, 1993, the parties 21
PRER14A30th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 30th
announced that 10,250,000 shares of Common Stock would be issued to the stockholders of CT and CTF upon consummation of the Acquisition subject to,^ among other things, ^ receipt of financial advisory opinions, ratification by the Board of Directors of the Company, approval by the stockholders of the Company, and execution of an agreement with NBC regarding the Redemption. ^ In November, 1993, a purported class action and derivative suit was filed against the Company, the members of the Board of Directors, CT, CTF, Jorge Mas Canosa, Jorge Mas and Juan Carlos Mas with respect to the Acquisition Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. See "CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS AND LITIGATIONS". At a meeting of the Special Transaction Committee on November 9, 1993, the status of the Acquisition was reviewed by the Committee and the terms of the Redemption were discussed among the members of the Committee and their financial and legal advisers. It was indicated that a proposal had been received from NBC subsequent to November 4, 1993 pursuant to which (i) the Company would redeem the shares of Burnup Common Stock owned by NBC for $6.00 per share or a total redemption price of $18,923,082, and (ii) the Company would cancel (x) the Subordinated Debenture, having a book value of 17,291,000, at an amount equal to $17,250,000 and (y) the remaining balance outstanding under the Other Indebtedness. The Committee expressed the view that the per share redemption price should not exceed the value negotiated for the shares of Burnup Common Stock being issued in the Acquisition. On November 10, 1993, discussions were held between PaineWebber and representatives of NBC with respect to the terms of the Redemption. During these discussions, the relative values of the Company, the Subordinated Debenture and the Other Indebtedness were analyzed by the respective parties. Later that evening, a meeting of the Special Transaction Committee was held. PaineWebber indicated to the Committee that NBC was prepared to accept the per share value arrived at in the Acquisition, but was insistent on discounting the Subordinated Debenture, in light of the fact that the Subordinated Debenture could be prepaid at any time without penalty. In addition, NBC had requested that all interest cease accruing on the Subordinated Debenture commencing December 1, 1993. PaineWebber then answered numerous questions concerning the terms proposed by NBC, including an analysis of the valuation of the Subordinated Debenture and Other Indebtedness. A discussion also ensued concerning the preferred stock of NBC owned by the Company and whether all or a 22
PRER14A31st Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 31st
portion of such preferred stock should be utilized in the Redemption. The Committee's advisers stated that NBC indicated it would not accept any terms requiring NBC to retire its preferred stock. The Committee concluded that it would be inappropriate to discount the Subordinated Debenture in connection with the Redemption and directed PaineWebber to propose the following to NBC: (i) the Company would redeem the shares of Common Stock owned by NBC at $5.74 per share (the per share value in the Acquisition), (ii) the Company would cancel the Subordinated Debenture at its face value of $17,500,000 and (iii) the balance of $592,313 would be applied to reduce the Other Indebtedness. Discussions continued on November 11, 1993 between PaineWebber and representatives of NBC. At a meeting of the Special Transaction Committee later that day, PaineWebber advised the Committee that representatives of NBC were prepared to recommend to the Board of Directors ^ of NBC the Special Transaction Committee's proposal made by PaineWebber earlier in the day; provided all collateral underlying the Other Indebtedness was released by the Company. PaineWebber then reviewed for the Committee the terms of the Other Indebtedness and the security underlying the obligations. The Committee concluded that it would not agree to release any collateral and would not alter from its previous proposal and directed PaineWebber to communicate the Committee's position to representatives of NBC. On November 16, 1993, a meeting of the Special Transaction Committee was held. During the meeting, an overview of the negotiations was presented as well as the historical and pro forma financial results of the CT Group and the Company. Representatives from PaineWebber answered questions and discussed in detail the structure of the transaction and the valuations utilized to negotiate the Acquisition and Redemption. During the meeting, PaineWebber advised the Committee of its valuation analysis and indicated that they were not aware of any facts on such date that would preclude such representatives from recommending to PaineWebber's fairness opinion committee that on such date, the Transaction is fair, from a financial point of view, to the Company and the holders of Common Stock other than NBC and its affiliates. The Committee's counsel then discussed legal issues concerning the Transaction and answered the questions of members of the Special Transaction Committee. The Special Transaction Committee then adopted a resolution to unanimously recommend that the Board approve the Acquisition Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, subject to receipt of stockholder approval and an amendment to the Agreement described below. At a meeting held immediately thereafter, the Board, by the unanimous vote of all directors (other than, Mr. Caporella, who abstained with respect to the Redemption), concluded that the transactions contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement was in the best interest of the 23
PRER14A32nd Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 32nd
Company's stockholders, and approved the Acquisition Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (including the Redemption), subject to receipt of a written fairness opinion from PaineWebber, an executed Amendment to the Acquisition Agreement described below, waiver by the CT Group of its rights to terminate the Acquisition Agreement as a result of the filing of the 1993 Complaint (as defined herein) and the execution of the agreement between the Company and NBC with respect to the Redemption. The Board also resolved to recommend that the stockholders approve and adopt the Acquisition Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. On November 23, 1993, the stockholders of the CT Group and the Company executed the First Amendment to the Agreement (the "First Amendment") which provided for, among other things: (i) the exchange ratio of the CT and CTF Shares for the Burnup Shares, (ii) the waiver by the stockholders of the CT Group of their rights with respect to the 1993 Complaint and (iii) the amount and manner of payment of the distribution to the stockholders of the CT Group. In addition, a Second Amendment to the Agreement was executed by the parties, effective November 23, 1993, to clarify a mutual mistake in the First Amendment with respect to the calculation of the distribution to be made to the stockholders of the CT Group by CT and CTF. On January 18, 1993, PaineWebber delivered its written fairness opinion to the Special Transaction Committee that each of the Acquisition, Redemption and Transaction is fair, from a financial point of view, to the Company and the stockholders of the Company, other than NBC and its affiliates. Reasons for Engaging in the Acquisition In determining to recommend the approval of the Acquisition Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby to the full Board of Directors, and in approving the Acquisition Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and recommending that stockholders approve and adopt the Acquisition Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, the Special Transaction Committee and the Board, respectively, considered and based their opinion as to the fairness of the transactions contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement, on a number of factors, including the following: (i) the belief of Board and 24
PRER14A33rd Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 33rd
the Special Transaction Committee, that the combination of the Company and the CT Group is an attractive business opportunity because the Company's core business operations, business prospects and senior operating management will be strengthened through the consummation of the Acquisition and greater economies of scale and synergies will be created through the Acquisition; (ii) the belief of the Board and the Special Transaction Committee that significant favorable recent developments are taking place in the domestic and international telecommunications industry and that the combined entity will be better able to compete in the global marketplace; (iii) the fact that the transactions contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement require the approval of the stockholders of the Company; (iv) information with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, business and prospects of CT and CTF and the Company and current industry, economic and market conditions as well as the risks involved in achieving those prospects; (v) the possible alternatives to the Acquisition, including the prospects of the Company continuing to successfully operate as an independent entity, and in particular, the potential adverse consequences to the Company, including its business prospects and its ability to retain and attract talented operating management, in the event the Acquisition were not to occur; (vi) the fact that, notwithstanding the Company's objective to effect a business combination and the significant possibility of the Company being sold or a change in control of the Company occurring, no expressions of interest or proposals from third parties which might be interested in acquiring the Company were received by the Board of Directors; (vii) the fact that the Acquisition is not structured to preclude additional bona fide offers to acquire the Company and that the Acquisition Agreement permits the Board of Directors of the Company in the exercise of its fiduciary obligations under applicable law, to review and accept proposals from third parties relating to any acquisition of the Company; and (viii) the oral and written presentations of PaineWebber described under "Report and Opinion of Financial Advisor" and the written opinion of PaineWebber to the effect that, as of the date of its opinion, each of the Acquisition, Redemption, and the Transaction, is fair from a financial point of view to the Company and the stockholders of the Company other than NBC and its affiliates. In view of the wide variety of factors considered in connection with its evaluation of the transaction neither the Special Transaction Committee nor the Board found it practicable to and did not, quantify or otherwise attempt to assign relative weights to the specific factors in reaching its determination, although it viewed the matters set forth in (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) (v), (vi), (vii) and (viii) as favorable to its decision. Moreover, the Special Transaction Committee and the Board placed special emphasis on the financial terms 25
PRER14A34th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 34th
of the Acquisition and the transactions contemplated thereby (including the Redemption) and the absence of any other proposals from third parties to acquire the Company. The factors discussed above were considered by the Special Transaction Committee and the Board in the manner set below: (i) As noted above, the Special Transaction Committee and the Board considered favorable the matters set forth in item (i). The Special Transaction Committee and the Board reviewed the financial results of the Company, including a three-year revenue decline and losses incurred during that period, and compared such results to the historical financial results of the CT Group and proforma combined financial results of the Company and the CT Group. The Board and Special Transaction Committee noted that the CT Group results were obtained within a more contained geographic area. The Board and Special Transaction Committee also noted that recently the Company had been required to obtain waivers of certain violations of its loan documents. The Special Transaction Committee and the Board considered the synergies that would result from combining the companies, and concluded that increased economies of scale are attainable through the Acquisition, primarily due to the more efficient use of equipment and personnel and the elimination of certain administrative redundancies. In addition, the combination of the financial strength and operational capabilities of the CT Group along with the potential increased efficiencies that would result from the Acquisition were considered by the Special Transaction Committee and the Board as being favorable to the development of business prospects. The Special Transaction Committee and Board noted the closing stock price of the Common Stock on NASDAQ had increased approximately 44% since the initial announcement of the transaction through November 15, 1993 and interpreted the increase as a favorable perception of the combined entities by the investment community. The Board and the Special Transaction Committee also considered as favorable the potential strengthening of senior operating management through the consummation of the Acquisition. The attraction and retention of management personnel who are experienced within the telecommunications industry and have demonstrated knowledge of the business, the customer base, and operating efficiencies as demonstrated by the strong operating margins attained by the CT Group was considered important to the growth of the Company, particularly in view of anticipated capital spending programs expected to occur in the domestic and international telephone and cable industries. (ii) As noted above, the Special Transaction Committee and the Board considered as favorable the matters set forth in item (ii). The Special Transaction Committee and the Board 26
PRER14A35th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 35th
discussed the various opportunities which are available to the telecommunications industry in view of recent legislation allowing the formation of alliances between cable television and telephone companies and concluded that a business combination with the CT Group would result in the enhancement of earnings and shareholder value. Additionally, the Special Transaction Committee and the Board considered as favorable the combination of experience and customer contacts of management of the Company and the CT Group relative to international opportunities and the potential for further significant development of the Company's international telecommunications customer base resulting from the Acquisition, and concluded the combined entity would be better equipped and financially able to compete in the global marketplace. The Special Transaction Committee also noted the probable need for additional capital in order to take advantage of the projected expansion of telecommunications construction and the likelihood of the Company obtaining such capital as a stand alone entity. (iii) As noted above, the Special Transaction Committee and the Board considered as favorable the matters set forth in item (iii). Specifically, the Special Transaction Committee and the Board viewed as favorable the requirement that the transactions contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement required the approval of holders of a majority of the outstanding Common Stock. (iv) As noted above, the Special Transaction Committee and the Board considered as favorable the matters set forth in item (iv). The Special Transaction Committee and the Board reviewed the information provided in presentations by the Company's advisors and management, including summary historical financial information for both the Company and the CT Group and proforma financial information for the combined entity. The Special Transaction Committee and the Board also reviewed the historical volatility of the Company's financial performance and the demands placed on the Company and other large, telecommunications companies to compete effectively, particularly in view of the past prolonged economic pressures. On the basis of such review, the Special Transaction Committee and the Board reconfirmed their understanding of the Company's and the CT Group's historical financial and business results and prospects, the necessity to stabilize and strengthen the Company's financial performance, and to increase the Company's presence in the global telecommunications marketplace. The Special Transaction Committee also reviewed such risks as currency and political risks associated with international opportunities and the potential returns to be realized if global business development can be efficiently implemented. 27
PRER14A36th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 36th
(v) As noted above, the Special Transaction Committee and the Board considered as favorable the matters set forth in item (v). Possible alternatives to the transactions contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement were discussed at various meetings of the Special Transaction Committee and the Board. In that connection, members of the Special Transaction Committee were advised of alternative transaction structures which had been discussed and rejected or withdrawn during the period from 1990 through 1993. Alternative transactions included the Company's entering into an agreement to acquire beneficial ownership of certain shares and other interests in Dycom for the purpose of effecting a merger with Dycom. See "Background of Transaction". The members of the Special Transaction Committee and the Board also explored the alternatives which may or may not be available to the Company in the event that the transactions contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement were not consummated, including the possible further deterioration in the Company's financial results. Based on its understanding of the potentially adverse consequences to the Company, including the potential loss of certain business opportunities and the Company's current ability to retain and attract talented operating management, the Special Transaction Committee considered favorably the terms of the Acquisition and the transactions contemplated thereby and recommended that the stockholders of the Company approve and adopt the Acquisition Agreement. (vi) As noted above, the Special Transaction Committee and the Board considered as favorable the matters set forth in item (vi). In connection with their consideration of such matters, the Special Transaction Committee and the Board reviewed the fact that, notwithstanding the fact that several press releases and newspaper articles were disseminated to the public concerning the Company's desire to enhance shareholder value through a business combination as well as the announcement of the negotiations between the Company and the CT Group and the execution of the Acquisition Agreement, no proposals from third parties which might be interested in acquiring the Company have been received by the Board of Directors. (vii) As noted above, the Special Transaction Committee and the Board considered as favorable the matter set forth in item (vii). Specifically, the fact that the Acquisition is not structured to preclude consideration of additional bona fide offers by third parties to acquire the Company and the Acquisition Agreement permits the Special Transaction Committee to provide information and to accept, review and negotiate with such parties prior 28
PRER14A37th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 37th
to the Closing is fair to the stockholders of the Company. The Special Transaction Committee and the Board required that the terms of the Acquisition Agreement not preclude the Company from terminating the Acquisition Agreement if a more favorable transaction were to be proposed and noted that no "lock-up" arrangements were entered into in connection with the Acquisition nor would break-up fees in excess of $500,000 be payable in the event the Acquisition were terminated. (viii) As noted above, the Special Transaction Committee and the Board considered as favorable the matter set forth in Item (viii). In connection with their consideration of such matters, the Special Transaction Committee and the Board relied in part on the presentation of PaineWebber described under "Report and Opinion of Financial Advisor" and adopted as reasonable both PaineWebber's presentations and analysis of various factors described therein. Report and Opinion of Financial Advisor The Special Transaction Committee has retained PaineWebber as its financial advisor in connection with the Acquisition and to render a fairness opinion to the Special Transaction Committee with respect to the Company and the holders of Common Stock, other than NBC and its affiliates. ^ On November 16, 1993, in connection with the evaluation of the Acquisition and the transactions contemplated thereby by the Board of Directors ^ and the Special Transaction Committee, representatives of PaineWebber advised the Special Transaction Committee of its valuation analysis and indicated that they were not aware of any facts on such date that would preclude such representatives from recommending to PaineWebber's fairness opinion committee that on such date, the Transaction is fair from a financial point of view to the Company and holders of Common Stock other than NBC and its affiliates. On January 18, 1994, PaineWebber delivered its written opinion to the Special Transaction Committee indicating that each of the Acquisition, Redemption and Transaction is fair from a financial point of view to Company and the holders of Common Stock, other than NBC and its affiliates. Stockholders are urged to read such opinion in its entirety for a discussion of the assumptions made, the matters considered and the scope of the review undertaken in rendering 29
PRER14A38th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 38th
such opinion. The fairness opinion will be updated by PaineWebber immediately prior to the Meeting. A copy of the opinion letter of PaineWebber dated the date of this Proxy Statement is attached as Appendix B and should be read carefully and in its entirety by the holders of Common Stock. In rendering its written opinion to the Special Transaction Committee, PaineWebber: (i) reviewed the audited financial statements for CT and CTF for the three fiscal years ended December 31, 1992, and reviewed the unaudited financial statements for CT and CTF for the six months ended June 30, 1993; (ii) reviewed the combined audited financial statements for the CT Group for the three years ended December 31, 1992, and reviewed the unaudited financial statements for the CT Group for the nine months ended September 30, 1993; (iii) reviewed the Company's Annual Reports, Forms 10-K and related financial information for the three fiscal years ended April 30, 1993 and the Company's Form 10-Q and the related unaudited financial information for the six months ended October 31, 1993; (iv) reviewed an estimated income statement for the CT Group for the year ended December 31, 1993 and an estimated income statement for the Company for the year ended April 30, 1994; (v) conducted discussions with members of senior management of the CT Group and the Company concerning their respective businesses and prospects; (vi) reviewed the summary appraisal reports dated June and July of 1991 and an updated market analysis dated August 12, 1993 prepared by an outside appraisal firm with respect to certain of the Company's real estate assets; (vii) reviewed the historical market prices and trading activity of the Company's Common Stock and compared them with that of certain publicly traded companies which PaineWebber deemed to be reasonably similar to the Company; (viii) compared the results of operations of the CT Group and the Company and compared them with that of certain publicly traded companies which PaineWebber deemed to be reasonably similar to the CT Group and the Company, respectively; (ix) reviewed the terms of the Subordinated Debenture and Other Indebtedness; (x) reviewed the Acquisition Agreement; and (xi) reviewed such other financial studies and analyses and performed such other investigations and took into account such other matters as PaineWebber deemed necessary, including PaineWebber's assessment of general economic, market and monetary conditions. In preparing its opinion, PaineWebber relied on the accuracy and completeness of all information supplied or otherwise made available to PaineWebber by the Company, CT and CTF and assumed that estimates have been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available information and judgments of the managements of the Company, CT and CTF 30
PRER14A39th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 39th
as to the expected future financial performance of their respective companies. PaineWebber did not independently verify such information or assumptions, including estimates, or undertake an independent appraisal of the assets of the Company, CT or CTF. PaineWebber's opinion is based upon market, economic, financial and other conditions as they exist and can be evaluated as of the date of the opinion. PaineWebber's opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any holder of Common Stock of the Company as to how any such holder of Common Stock should vote on the Acquisition. The opinion does not address the relative merits of the Transaction and any other transactions or business strategies discussed by the Board of Directors of the Company as alternatives to the Transaction or the decision of ^ the Board of Directors ^ of the Company to proceed with the Transaction. Although various estimates of value were developed with respect to the combined entities, no opinion is expressed by PaineWebber as to the price at which the securities to be issued in the Transaction may trade at any time. PaineWebber assumed that there had been no material change in the Company's, CT's or CTF's assets, financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects since the date of the last financial statements made available to PaineWebber. PaineWebber relied upon the Company with respect to the accounting treatment to be accorded in the Acquisition. In addition, PaineWebber did not make an independent evaluation, appraisal or physical inspection of the assets or individual properties of the Company, CT or CTF. In rendering its opinion, PaineWebber has not been engaged to act as an agent or fiduciary of, and the Company has expressly waived any duties or liabilities PaineWebber may otherwise be deemed to have had to, the Company's equity holders or any other third party. The preparation of a fairness opinion involves various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant quantitative and qualitative methods of financial analyses and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances and, therefore, such an opinion is not readily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. Furthermore, in arriving at its fairness opinion, PaineWebber did not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor considered by it, but rather made qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of each analysis or factor. Accordingly, PaineWebber believes that its analysis must be considered as a whole and that considering any portion of such analysis and of the factors considered, without considering all analyses and factors, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying its opinion. In its analyses, PaineWebber made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, 31
PRER14A40th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 40th
general business and economic conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of the Company, CT and CTF. Any estimates contained in these analyses are not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of future results or values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than as set forth therein, and none of PaineWebber, the Company, CT or CTF assumes responsibility for the accuracy of such estimates. In addition, analyses relating to the value of such businesses do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which business may actually be sold. The following paragraphs summarize the significant analyses performed by PaineWebber in its presentations to the Special Transaction Committee of the Company and in delivering its written opinion dated January 18, 1994. ^ The ^ Acquisition Selected Comparable Public Company Analysis. Using publicly available information, PaineWebber compared selected historical and financial operating data of the Company and the CT Group and the stock market performance data of the Company to the corresponding data of certain publicly traded companies. These comparable companies consisted of Butler International, Inc., CRSS Services, Inc., Dycom Industries, Inc., L.E. Myers Co. Group and UTILX Corporation. Because of the inherent differences between the operations of the Company, CT Group and the selected comparable companies, PaineWebber believed that a purely quantitative comparable company analysis would not be particularly meaningful in the context of the Acquisition. As PaineWebber informed the Special Transaction Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, an appropriate use of comparable public company analysis in this instance would involve qualitative judgments concerning differences between the financial and operating characteristics which would affect the public trading values of the selected companies, the Company and CT Group. To determine a valuation range for the CT Group based upon comparable public company analysis but subject to the foregoing limitations, PaineWebber determined ranges of 32
PRER14A41st Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 41st
multiples of total value to revenues, total value to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"), total value to earnings before interest and taxes ("EBIT"), and equity value to net income. The comparable public company analysis resulted in a total value range for the CT Group of $50.0 million to $65.0 million, from which PaineWebber deducted the CT Group's pro forma total outstanding debt and added back its cash balance (after giving effect to the transactions contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement), resulting in an equity value range of $54.9 million to $69.9 million. PaineWebber noted that the negotiated equity value for the CT Group as disclosed in the Acquisition Agreement was $58.8 million. Implied Stock Price Analysis. PaineWebber noted that because the stockholders of the CT Group will hold approximately 65% of the outstanding common stock of the Company on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the Acquisition and the Redemption, the historical market prices of the Company's Common Stock are not necessarily indicative of the fair value of the Company's Common Stock being issued in the Acquisition. Using the range of equity values that resulted from the comparable public company analysis and dividing by the 10.25 million shares of Common Stock to be issued in the Acquisition, PaineWebber determined an implied stock price range of $5.36 to $6.82 per share at which the shares of Common Stock were being issued in the Acquisition. PaineWebber then compared the implied stock price to the price of ^ the Company's Common Stock ^ on September 23, 1993 (the announcement date of the Transaction), and for an average of the Company's stock price for one month prior to the announcement to determine the premiums of the implied stock price over the price of the Company's Common Stock. ^ This analysis indicated that the range of implied premiums to the September 23, 1993 stock market price is 64.8% to 109.9% and that the range to average stock market price is 96.2% to 149.8%. Multiples Paid Analysis. PaineWebber performed an analysis of the implied multiples of the Acquisition for various historical operating results for the CT Group's nine months ended September 30, 1993, and the estimated operating results for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993. PaineWebber utilized the same range of values derived from the comparable public company analysis to analyze the resulting multiples. Using the CT Group's historical operating results for the twelve months ended September 30, 1993 resulted in the following ranges: 0.9x to 1.2x sales; 3.6x to 4.7x EBITDA; 3.8x to 5.0x EBIT; and 6.8x to 8.6x net income. Using the CT Group's estimated operating results for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993 resulted in the following ranges: 1.1x to 1.5x sales; 4.3x to 5.7x EBITDA; 4.6x to 6.0x EBIT; and 8.2x to 10.4x net income. 33
PRER14A42nd Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 42nd
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. PaineWebber analyzed the CT Group based on an unlevered discounted cash flow analysis of the projected financial performance of the CT Group. Because the management of CT Group did not provide projections other than an estimate of the financial results for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993, PaineWebber performed several different discounted cash flow analyses utilizing a range of revenue growth rates and EBIT margins selected by PaineWebber based on discussions with the management of the Company and the CT Group. The discounted cash flow analysis determined the present value of the CT Group's unlevered after-tax cash flows generated over a five year period and then added to such discounted value the present value of the estimated residual valuation at the end of the five years for each scenario to provide a total value. "Unlevered after-tax cash flows" were calculated as tax-effected EBIT plus depreciation and amortization, plus (or minus) net changes in non-cash working capital, minus capital expenditures. The analysis utilized two methodologies for determining the terminal value. The first methodology calculated a terminal value based upon a range of multiples of EBIT from 6.0x to 7.5x. The second methodology calculated a terminal value based on a range of perpetual growth rates from 2.0% to 5.0% of the unlevered after-tax cash flows. The unlevered after-tax cash flows and the terminal values were discounted using a range of discount rates from 12.0% to 18.0% which were selected by PaineWebber based on PaineWebber's investment banking experience. This range also reflects the risk assumptions applied by PaineWebber to the financial forecasts. PaineWebber noted that because of the inherent uncertainties of the projections used in this analysis, the results of this analysis may not be considered particularly reliable. The Redemption Analysis of the Redemption. PaineWebber noted that, as set forth in the Acquisition Agreement, the satisfaction of all of the conditions to the Redemption (other than consummation of the Acquisition) was a condition to consummation of the Acquisition and its analysis of the Redemption was performed in that context. 34
PRER14A43rd Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 43rd
PaineWebber reviewed the terms of the 14% Subordinated Debenture in the principal amount of $17,500,000 and the Promissory Note in the then principal amount of $1,374,000 issued by NBC to the Company. PaineWebber noted that the terms of the 14% Subordinated Debenture included a provision which rendered the Subordinated Debenture callable at any time. PaineWebber also noted that the Company carried the Subordinated Debenture at a discount on its books, but in arriving at the terms of the Redemption , the Company valued the Subordinated Debenture at its face amount. Break-up Analysis. PaineWebber analyzed the net book value per share of the Company assuming the termination of the Company's operating activities and the liquidation of the Company's assets and liabilities. This analysis was based upon: (i) the Company's October 31, 1993 balance sheet; (ii) discussions with the Company's management, including their estimates of the realizable value of certain assets and liabilities; (iii) real estate appraisals prepared by an outside appraisal firm and provided by the Company to PaineWebber; and (iv) assumptions made by PaineWebber as to the liquidation value of certain assets and liabilities. To determine the net book value per share of the Company in a break-up scenario, PaineWebber determined the realizable value (net of taxes) of the Company's assets, deducted the book value of the Company's liabilities and an estimate of liquidation expenses, and then divided the result by approximately 8.8 million shares, the number of outstanding shares of the Company's Common Stock as of December 1, 1993. In performing this analysis, PaineWebber applied a range of discounts from 0.0% to 15.0% to the appraised/estimated value of the Company's plant, property and equipment. This analysis resulted in a range of net book value per share from $4.61 to $5.34. The negotiated stock price of $5.74 reflected in the Acquisition Agreement was used by PaineWebber to determine the implied premium to the range of net book values per share. This analysis indicated a range of premiums of 7.5% to 24.5% to the negotiated stock price of $5.74 per share as reflected in the Acquisition Agreement. In addition, PaineWebber applied a 27.1% premium, the average premium for the four week period prior to the announcement of selected transactions of between $30 to $400 million from January 1, 1992 to November 9, 1993, to the range of net book value per share determined by the break-up analysis. This analysis resulted in a range of stock prices for the Company from $5.86 to $6.79 per share. Post-Acquisition; Pre-Redemption Analysis. PaineWebber analyzed the equity value per share of the Company assuming consummation of the Acquisition but prior to the consummation of the Redemption. In this analysis, the range of equity values ($54.9 million to $69.9 35
PRER14A44th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 44th
million) for the CT Group derived from the comparable public company analysis was added to the range of equity values ($40.4 million to $46.8) for the Company derived from the break-up analysis resulting in a combined equity value from $95.3 million to $116.7 million. Dividing this result by the number of shares outstanding after the Acquisition and prior to the Redemption (19.02 million shares) resulted in an equity value per share range of $5.01 to $6.14. PaineWebber used the resulting net book values per share to analyze the implied premiums to the negotiated stock price of the Company. On the basis of, and subject to the foregoing, PaineWebber delivered a written opinion to the Special Transaction Committee that each of the Acquisition, Redemption, and Transaction is fair, from a financial point of view, to the Company and holders of Common Stock other than NBC and its affiliates. PaineWebber was selected by the Special Transaction Committee as its financial advisor in connection with the Acquisition because of its background, reputation and expertise as investment bankers and financial advisors. PaineWebber regularly provides a range of financial advisory and investment banking services, including providing financial advisory services to and valuations of companies involved in merger and acquisition transactions. PaineWebber has provided investment banking services to the Special Transaction Committee from time to time. During the past two years, PaineWebber was paid approximately $275,000 in connection with investment banking services provided. For financial advisory services in connection with the consummation of the Acquisition, including the rendering of its opinion, the Company has agreed to pay PaineWebber a fee of $10,000 per month for twelve months and $125,000 upon delivery of their written opinion. The Company has also agreed to reimburse PaineWebber for its reasonable fees and expenses of legal counsel, and to indemnify it against certain expenses and liabilities in connection with its services, including those arising under federal securities laws. Terms of the Acquisition Agreement 36
PRER14A45th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 45th
Sale and Purchase of Shares. The Acquisition Agreement provides that the Company shall acquire all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of CT and CTF in exchange for 10,250,000 shares of the Common Stock of the Company. Representations and Warranties. The Acquisition Agreement contains various representations and warranties made by each of the Company, CT and CTF and relating to, among other things, organization and similar corporate matters, financial statements, taxes, title to property and certain other matters. Conditions of the Acquisition. The respective obligations of the Company, CT and CTF to effect the Acquisition are conditioned upon, among other things, (i) approval of the Acquisition Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby by the Board of Directors of the Company and the holders of Common Stock; (ii) no action or proceeding having been instituted to restrain or prohibit any of the transactions contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement; (iii) expiration or termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act and receipt of all material consents and approvals required to permit the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement; (iv) the agreement effecting the Redemption having been duly executed and delivered and not having been terminated or amended, and all conditions to the consummation of the agreement between NBC and the Company dated , 1994 (the "NBC Agreement") contemplated thereby having been satisfied or waived to the satisfaction of CT and CTF, except the condition requiring the consummation of the Acquisition; (v) the receipt of a written fairness opinion from PaineWebber and (vi) the fulfillment or waiver of certain other conditions, including the receipt of the written consent of certain lenders to the Company and the CT Group. Under the terms and conditions of the First Amendment, the parties waived their rights under the Acquisition Agreement not to consummate the Acquisition pursuant to Article VII of the Acquisition Agreement as a result of the filing of the 1993 Complaint. Certain Covenants. Each of the Company, CT and CTF have agreed, among other things, that, during the period from the date of the Acquisition Agreement to the Closing Date, except as permitted by the Acquisition Agreement or as consented to in writing by the other party, each will conduct its operations in the ordinary course of business, use its best efforts to do all things necessary in order to consummate the Acquisition and refrain from entering into certain transactions in excess of certain specified amounts. 37
PRER14A46th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 46th
Directors and Management of The Company Following the Acquisition. The Acquisition Agreement provides that upon consummation of the Acquisition, the Board of Directors will hold a meeting at which (i) Jorge Mas will be elected as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Board will determine his compensation and (ii) the size of the Board will be expanded from five to seven members. The directors intend to appoint Jorge L. Mas Canosa as a Class II Director and Jorge Mas as a Class I Director. Prior to the conducting of any other business at such meeting, Nick A. Caporella (a Class I Director) and Leo J. Hussey (a Class III Director) will resign from the Board of Directors. The remaining directors will appoint Eliot C. Abbott as a Class II Director and Arthur B. Laffer as a Class III Director, to fill the resulting vacancies. Messrs. Canosa and Mas are controlling stockholders of CT and CTF, respectively. Registration Rights. The Acquisition Agreement provides that commencing six months after the Closing Date, the Company would register on two occasions such number of Burnup Shares as the CT and CTF stockholders requested (which would not be less than 1,000,000 Burnup Shares in any one request) provided that at the time of such request the CT and CTF stockholders shall have owned in the aggregate at least 20% of the shares of Common Stock then outstanding. Upon such request, the Company had agreed, subject to certain conditions, to promptly prepare and file, at its expense, a registration statement with the SEC. The Acquisition Agreement also provides that commencing six months following the Closing Date, if the Company shall conduct an offering of its securities, the Company will allow the CT and CTF stockholders, subject to certain conditions, to include a minimum of 50,000 shares in any such registration at the Company's expense. Indemnification. The Acquisition Agreement provides that (i) the Company shall indemnify and hold harmless CT, CTF and their respective stockholders and (ii) the CT and CTF stockholders shall indemnify and hold harmless the Company, its subsidiaries and their respective officers and directors from all damages arising out of a misrepresentation or breach of a warranty or covenant, agreement or obligation contained in the Acquisition Agreement. The CT and CTF stockholders shall be deemed to have made a misrepresentation or breached a warranty only if the damages suffered by the Company exceed $1,000,000 and the 38
PRER14A47th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 47th
aggregate liability of the CT and CTF stockholders is limited to the sum of $1,000,000 plus the aggregate fair market value of 350,000 Burnup Shares on the date of payment. The Company shall be deemed to have made a misrepresentation or have breached a warranty only if the damages suffered by the CT and CTF stockholders exceed $2,750,000 and the Company's aggregate liability is limited to the sum of $2,500,000. The Acquisition Agreement provides that at Closing, the Company will enter into an Indemnification Agreement with certain current and former directors and officers of the Company pursuant to which the Company is obligated to indemnify and hold harmless such directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law, subject to certain limitations, for a period of six years after Closing for all damages and costs which arise by reason of the fact that they were or are a director or officer of the Company. Termination; Expenses. The Acquisition Agreement will terminate if the Closing does not occur prior to February 28, 1994 unless extended by mutual agreement of the Company and the CT Group. The Acquisition Agreement also provides that in the event the Closing does not occur due to the failure of the Company or CT and CTF to fulfill certain conditions (other than approval of the Acquisition Agreement by the Company's stockholders) or due to a party's failure to close, the breaching/non-fulfilling party will pay the sum of $500,000 in damages. Government Approvals. The Acquisition is subject to the requirements of the HSR Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. On January 21, 1994, the Company and the CT Group made the necessary filings under the HSR Act with the Federal Trade Commission and Justice Department. Under the provisions of the HSR Act, the Acquisition may not be consummated until the thirty day waiting period expires, unless the request for early termination of the waiting period by the Company and the CT Group is granted. Certain Effects of the Acquisition General Effect. Upon consummation of the Acquisition, all the issued and outstanding capital stock of CT and CTF will be acquired by the Company and each of CT and CTF will be wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. 39
PRER14A48th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 48th
Change of Control. Upon consummation of the Acquisition and the transactions contemplated thereby, the former stockholders of CT and CTF will own approximately 65% of the outstanding Common Stock and to the extent they act in concert will be controlling stockholders of the Company. Accordingly, the former stockholders of CT and CTF will have the ability to control the affairs of the Company and control the election of the Company's directors regardless of how the other stockholders may vote. Furthermore, such persons will have the ability to control other actions requiring stockholder approval, including certain fundamental corporate transactions such as a merger or sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company, regardless of how the other stockholders may vote. This ability may be enhanced by the adoption of the proposed amendments to the Certificate, including those which would (i) increase the number of authorized shares of the Company's common stock from twenty-five million (25,000,000) to fifty million (50,000,000) and (ii) eliminate all designations, powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions in the Certificate of Incorporation relating to the Company's preferred stock. See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY'S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION". These proposed amendments to the Certificate may be deemed to have the effect of making more difficult the acquisition of control of the Company after the consummation of the Acquisition by means of a hostile tender offer, open market purchases, a proxy contest or otherwise. On the one hand, these amendments may be seen as encouraging persons seeking to acquire control of the Company to initiate such an acquisition through arms-length negotiations with the Company; on the other hand, the amendments may have the effect of discouraging a third party form making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of the Company, even though such an attempt may be economically beneficial to the Company and its stockholders. Furthermore, the proposed amendments to the Certificate and the fact that the CT and CTF stockholders will own approximately 65% of the Common Stock of the Company after the consummation of the Acquisition may have a negative effect on the market price and liquidity of the Common Stock ^ of the Company. ^ Dilution. The issuance, pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement of the Burnup Shares to the stockholders of CT and CTF, will dilute proportionately the aggregate voting power of present holders of Common Stock. The stockholders of CT and CTF will have the ability to elect the entire Board of Directors and to approve certain transactions at meetings of the Company's stockholders regardless of the vote of the minority stockholders. 40
PRER14A49th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 49th
^ Outstanding Stock Options. Pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, the Company is required to take such action as is necessary so that its 1976 Stock Option Plan and 1978 Stock Option Plan (the "Current Plans") provides that each option to purchase Common Stock (an "Option") and each right to elect an alternate settlement method ("SAR") held by (i) any employee of the Company who is terminated other than for just cause by the Company at any time during the twelve (12) month period subsequent to October 15, 1993 shall become immediately exercisable and vested, whether or not previously exercisable or vested, on the date of receipt by such employee of notice of termination of employment by the Company or receipt by the Company of notice of voluntary termination, as the case may be, and such employee shall, for a period of three months thereafter, have the right to exercise such Option or SAR, and (ii) any employee who is terminated for just cause, or who voluntarily terminates his employment subsequent to the Closing Date shall not become exercisable or vested except as currently provided under such plans. The Acquisition Agreement states that "termination for just cause" includes termination by reason of a material breach by the employee of his duties (after 10-day notice thereof and opportunity to cure), gross negligence, fraud or willful misconduct by the employee in the performance of his duties, excessive absences by the employee not related to illness, misappropriation by the employee of any assets of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, commission by the employee of any crime involving moral turpitude and conviction of a felony. On November 16, 1993, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee and Board of Directors ^ authorized amendments to the Current Plans to comply with the terms of the Acquisition Agreement. Federal Income Tax Considerations. The Company, CT and CTF do not intend to request a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") regarding the federal income tax consequences of the Acquisition. CT and CTF have received an opinion from Price Waterhouse to the effect that the Acquisition constitutes as a "reorganization" within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. This opinion (referred to herein as the "Tax Opinion") will neither bind the IRS nor preclude the IRS from successfully asserting a contrary position. In addition, the Tax Opinion will be subject to certain assumptions and qualifications and will be based on the truth and accuracy of representations made by CT and CTF and the CT and CTF stockholders. 41
PRER14A50th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 50th
A successful IRS challenge to the reorganization status of the Acquisition would result in each of the CT and CTF stockholders recognizing gain or loss with respect to each share of common stock of CT and CTF equal to the difference between such stockholder's basis in such share and the aggregate amount of consideration received in exchange therefor. Such stockholder's aggregate basis in the Common Stock so received would then equal its fair market value and his holding period for such stock would begin the day after the Acquisition. Accounting Treatment. The Acquisition will be accounted for as a "purchase", as such term is used under generally accepted accounting principles, for accounting and financial reporting purposes. Because of certain factors including the fact that the former stockholders of the CT Group will hold a majority of the Common Stock subsequent to the closing of the Acquisition and that they or their designees will constitute a majority of the Board of Directors, it is anticipated that the Acquisition will be treated as a "reverse acquisition," with the CT Group considered to be the acquiring entity. As a result, the Company will establish a new accounting basis for its assets and liabilities based upon the fair values thereof and the CT Group's purchase price (based on the market value of Common Stock immediately prior to Closing), including the costs of acquisition incurred by CT and CTF. A final determination of required purchase accounting adjustments and of the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the Company has not been made as of the date of this Proxy Statement. Accordingly, the purchase accounting adjustments made in connection with the development of the unaudited pro forma financial information appearing elsewhere in this Proxy Statement are preliminary and have been made solely for purposes of developing such pro forma financial information to comply with disclosure requirements of the SEC. The Company will undertake a study to determine the fair value of its assets and liabilities and will make appropriate purchase accounting adjustments upon completion of that study. For financial purposes, the Company will consolidate the results of operations of CT and CTF with those of the Company's operations beginning with the consummation of the Acquisition, and the Company's financial statements for prior periods will reflect the historical results of CT and CTF. See "THE COMPANY, CT AND CTF UNAUDITED COMBINED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS." Bonus Service Pool. At or prior to Closing, the Company may pay compensation in recognition of loyalty and past service in the aggregate amount of up to $1,000,000, to such executive officers and employees of the Company and in such amounts, as Nick A. Caporella 42
PRER14A51st Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 51st
shall determine in his sole discretion (after consultation with Jorge Mas). No bonuses will be awarded to Mr. Caporella. Interest of Certain Persons in Matters to be Acted Upon The Acquisition Agreement provides as a condition to the consummation of the Acquisition by the stockholders of CT and CTF and the Company that (i) the Company shall have entered into an agreement with NBC pursuant to which the Company shall have agreed to redeem and purchase 3,153,847 shares of Common Stock owned by NBC, (ii) all of the conditions to the consummation of the Redemption shall have been satisfied or waived, except the condition requiring consummation of the Acquisition, and (iii) the stockholders of CT and CTF shall have received a written certificate from the Chief Executive Officer and ^ Chief Financial Officer of the Company that all of the conditions to the consummation of the Redemption shall have been satisfied or waived, except the condition to the Redemption that the Acquisition shall have occurred, which certificate shall be supported by a certificate from the Chief Executive Officer ^ of NBC, to the same effect. Accordingly, the Acquisition will be consummated prior to the Redemption. ^ The Redemption was negotiated and approved by the Special Transaction Committee on behalf of the stockholders of the Company (other than NBC and its affiliates). The Redemption will not be consummated unless the Acquisition shall have occurred. Accordingly, assuming satisfaction of all other conditions to the consummation of the Acquisition, approval by stockholders of the Acquisition Agreement shall result in consummation of the Redemption. NBC, which currently holds approximately 36% of the Common Stock, will vote in connection with the proposal to approve the Acquisition Agreement. The consideration for the Redemption and purchase will be the cancellation of the outstanding principal of $17,500,000 under the Subordinated Debenture owed to the Company by NBC and crediting the next succeeding principal payments in the amount of $592,313 of Other Indebtedness with an outstanding principal amount of $1,371,430 owed to the Company by NBC. Nick A. Caporella, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company is also the Chairman of the Board of Directors, President, Chief Executive Officer and controlling stockholder of NBC. On November 16, 1993, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the Redemption. The Board of Directors of NBC has not yet met to consider the terms of the Redemption. See " PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & 43
PRER14A52nd Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 52nd
TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. - ^ Interest of Certain Persons in Matters to be Acted Upon." For a discussion of the negotiations relating to the Acquisition and Redemption and a description of the terms of the Acquisition Agreement^, see "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. - Background of Transaction" and "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. - Terms of the Acquisition Agreement." ^ Operations Following the Acquisition ^ Following consummation of the Acquisition, each of CT and CTF will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Other than as described below, it is the present intention of the Company to operate CT and CTF under their present names and related trade names in substantially the same manner following consummation of the Acquisition as currently being operated. ^ Following consummation of the Acquisition, it is anticipated that the Board of Directors will attempt to integrate the businesses of the Company, CT and CTF as promptly and cost efficiently as is practicable, to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the combined enterprise and, in light of the foregoing, to attempt to capitalize on emerging opportunities both in the United States and abroad. In the process, changes may be effected in the Company's capitalization, dividend policy, corporate structure, business or management as the Board of Directors may from time to time determine to be necessary or desirable. However, except as noted in this Proxy Statement, the proposed Board of Directors ^(after the Acquisition) has no present plans or proposals which would result in an extraordinary corporate transaction, such as a merger, reorganization, liquidation, relocation of operations, or sale or transfer of assets involving the Company, or any material changes in the Company's corporate structure, or business. Appraisal Rights 44
PRER14A53rd Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 53rd
Holders of Common Stock are not entitled to dissenters' rights of appraisal or other dissenters' rights under Delaware law with respect to the Acquisition or any transactions contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement. Restrictions on Resales of Burnup Shares to be Issued in the Acquisition The Burnup Shares to be issued in the Acquisition shall be restricted from transfer, subject to the resale limitations of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") or pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a person who has beneficially owned restricted shares for at least two years, including an "affiliate" as that term is defined under the Securities Act, is entitled to sell, within any three-month period, a number of such shares that does not exceed the greater of 1% of the then outstanding shares of common stock or the average weekly trading volume of the common stock during the four calendar weeks preceding such sale. Rule 144 also generally permits a person (other than an affiliate of the Company) who has owned restricted shares for at least three years to sell such shares without any volume limitation. For purposes of Rule 144, some or all of the ^ stockholders of CT and CTF prior to closing will be deemed to be affiliates of the Company following the consummation of the Acquisition. See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH ^ AND TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. - ^ Terms of the Acquisition Agreement - Registration Rights." Certain ^ Expenses of the Acquisition ^ It is estimated that the expenses to be incurred in connection with the Acquisition and Redemption will be approximately $900,000. Included in this amount are legal, accounting, printing, solicitation and other costs in connection with the preparation and dissemination of this Proxy Statement, and the fees for financial advisory services and fairness opinions. 45
PRER14A54th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 54th
^ Memorandum of Understanding ^ The Company's Certificate requires the affirmative vote or consent of the holders of four-fifths of all classes of the Company's stock entitled to vote in elections of directors of the Company (the "Voting Shares") in connection with certain transactions with any person, corporation or other entity ("Affiliated Entity") beneficially owning 10% or more of the outstanding Voting Shares. The Certificate provides, however, that the foregoing provision is not applicable to such transactions if the Board of Directors has approved by resolution a memorandum of understanding (a "Memorandum of Understanding") with such Affiliated Entity with respect to such transactions prior to the time such Affiliated Entity became an Affiliated Entity. In order to induce the stockholders of CT and CTF to enter into the Acquisition Agreement and by eliminating the effects of the foregoing provisions of the Certificate, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with each of Neff Machinery, Inc., Neff Rental, Inc. and Atlantic Real Estate Holding Corp. ("Neff Machinery," "Neff Rental" and "Atlantic," respectively) prior to the execution of the Acquisition Agreement . Each of Neff Machinery, Neff Rental and Atlantic is ^ controlled by ^ one or more stockholders of CT and CTF ^ and accordingly, following consummation of the Acquisition and by virtue of the ownership of the Burnup Shares by the CT Group, would be deemed affiliates of the Company. Although the stockholders of CT and CTF have no present intention of selling these companies to the Company, following consummation of the Acquisition, the Company ^ will ^ purchase and lease equipment and parts from, and obtain services from, these companies upon such terms and conditions as the Board of Directors shall approve, which terms and conditions will be no less favorable to the ^ Company than those that would be obtained in transactions of a similar type with unaffiliated third parties. ^ THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY, BY THE UNANIMOUS VOTE OF ALL DIRECTORS (OTHER THAN WITH RESPECT TO THE REDEMPTION, MR. CAPORELLA, WHO ABSTAINED) HAVE CONCLUDED THAT THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT ARE FAIR AND IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE COMPANY'S STOCKHOLDERS AND RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS APPROVE AND ADOPT THE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT. THE COMPANY'S DIRECTORS AND NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ARE 46
PRER14A55th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 55th
THE RECORD OWNERS OF 296,877 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK (APPROXIMATELY 3.3% OF THE OUTSTANDING SHARES) AND HAVE INDICATED THAT THEY INTEND TO VOTE THEIR SHARES FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT. 47
PRER14A56th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 56th
PROPOSAL TO APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY'S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION As a condition to the consummation of the Acquisition, the Company is required to have approved each of the amendments to its Certificate proposed by the CT and CTF stockholders. The Board of Directors has approved a resolution proposing to amend and restate the Certificate, as described below, subject to approval of the Acquisition by the Company's stockholders. The proposed amendments to the Certificate will not be effected unless a majority of the shares of outstanding Common Stock vote in favor of each amendment. The Board of Directors believes that it is advisable and in the best interest of the Company to approve each of the amendments to the Certificate in order to assure that, assuming the requisite stockholder vote is obtained and all other conditions to the Acquisition Agreement are fulfilled, the Acquisition can be consummated. The adoption of the amendments is contingent upon the consummation of the Acquisition ^ and, as such, will not be approved unless the Acquisition Agreement is approved by a vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock represented in person or by proxy at the Meeting. Upon consummation of the Acquisition, the former stockholders of CT and CTF will own approximately 65% of the issued and outstanding shares of voting common stock of the Company. Accordingly, the former stockholders of CT and CTF will have the ability to control the affairs of the Company and control the election of the Company's directors regardless of how the other stockholders may vote. Furthermore, such persons will have the ability to control other actions requiring stockholder approval, including certain fundamental corporate transactions such as a merger or sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company, regardless of how the other stockholders may vote. This ability may be enhanced by the adoption of the proposed amendments to the Certificate, including those which would (i) increase the number of authorized shares of the Company's common stock from twenty-five million (25,000,000) to fifty million (50,000,000) and (ii) eliminate all designations, powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions in the Certificate relating to the Company's preferred stock. These proposed amendments to the Certificate may be deemed to have the effect of making more difficult the acquisition of control of the Company after the consummation of 48
PRER14A57th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 57th
the acquisition by means of a hostile tender offer, open market purchases, a proxy contest or otherwise. On the one hand, these amendments may be seen as encouraging persons seeking to acquire control of the Company to initiate such an acquisition through arms-length negotiations with the Company; on the other hand, the amendments may have the effect of discouraging a third party form making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of the Company, even though such an attempt may be economically beneficial to the Company and its stockholders. Furthermore, the proposed amendments to the Certificate and the fact that the CT and CTF stockholders will own approximately 65% of the common stock of the Company after the consummation of the Acquisition may have a negative effect on the market price and liquidity of the common stock of the Company. The principal features of the proposed amendments are described below but this discussion is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the Company's Certificate as previously amended, and of the proposed Amended and Restated Certificate set forth in Appendices D and E hereto, respectively. Generally. The proposed amendment to the Certificate would: 1. Change the name of the Company to MasTec Inc.; 2. Increase the total number of shares of common stock which the Company is authorized to issue from 25,000,000 to 50,000,000; 3. Eliminate all designations, powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions prescribed in the Certificate relating to the 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized by the Certificate and which may in the future be issued by the Company; and 4. Approve the provisions of Section 102(b)(7) of Delaware General Corporation Law relating to the liability of directors (the "Delaware Law"). 49
PRER14A58th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 58th
In addition to the foregoing amendments, the Board of Directors has approved resolutions proposing to restate the Certificate in order to (i) clarify and/or shorten certain provisions of the Certificate, (ii) update the language of certain provisions of the Certificate to conform with applicable sections of the Delaware Law, (iii) incorporate into a single document various amendments made to the original Certificate since July 26, 1968, and (iv) renumber the various articles and paragraphs of the Certificate for ease of reference. Copies of the Company's Certificate, as previously amended, and of the proposed Amended and Restated Certificate are set forth in Appendices D and E hereto, respectively. Change of Corporate Name. The first of the proposed amendments to the Certificate would change the name of the Company to MasTec Inc. The CT and CTF stockholders have required this amendment to the Certificate because they believe that (i) the proposed name will make it easier for the financial community and others with whom the Company does business to associate the Company with its principal business, (ii) the proposed name, by indicating the Company's principal business, also indicates the technological and other resources of the Company, thus making it easier to attribute such resources to the Company's subsidiaries and affiliates and (iii) the founders of the Company, whose surnames form the current name of the Company, are no longer involved in its management. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE FOREGOING AMENDMENT TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE AMENDMENT. THE COMPANY'S DIRECTORS AND NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ARE THE RECORD OWNERS 296,877 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK (APPROXIMATELY 3.3% OF THE OUTSTANDING SHARES) AND HAVE INDICATED THAT THEY INTEND TO VOTE THEIR SHARES FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE FOREGOING AMENDMENT. 50
PRER14A59th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 59th
Increase In Authorized Capital Stock. The second of the proposed amendments to the Certificate would amend existing Article FIRST of the Certificate to increase the number of shares of Common Stock authorized to be issued by the Company from 25,000,000 to 50,000,000 shares. Such additional shares of Common Stock will be a part of the existing class of Common Stock of the Company and, if and when issued, will have the same rights and privileges as the shares of Common Stock of the Company presently outstanding. As of the Record Date, the Company had 8,768,339 shares of Common Stock outstanding, 1,459,000 shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance upon conversion of the Company's 12% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due November 15, 2000, and 547,000 shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Company's 1976 and 1978 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plans. See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH ^ & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. - ^"Certain Effects of the Acquisition - Outstanding Stock Options." ^ Set forth below are the number of shares of capital stock authorized, issued and outstanding, and unissued, as of the Record Date, and assuming the Certificate is amended as proposed and the Acquisition and the Redemption ^ are consummated: ˇ Download Table At January , 1994 If Acquisition is Consummated Authorized Authorized Issued and & Not Issued and & Not Class Authorized Outstanding Outstanding Authorized Outstanding Outstanding Common Stock 25,000,000 8,768,000 16,232,000 50,000,000 15,864,153 34,135,847 Preferred Stock 5,000,000 0 0 5,000,000 0 0 51
PRER14A60th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 60th
Once authorized, the additional shares of Common Stock will be issuable without further authorization of the stockholders and on such terms and for such consideration as may be determined by the Board of Directors provided that such consideration is at least equal to the par value thereof. No stockholder has preemptive rights. The proposed increase in the number of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock of the Company could have the effect of frustrating or discouraging an attempt to take over control of or merge with the Company because such shares could be issued to dilute the stock ownership of any person seeking to obtain control of or merge with the Company. CT ^ and CTF have required, as a condition of the Acquisition, that the Company increase the number of authorized and unissued shares of Common Stock of the Company. Such shares would be available for possible use in the future in connection with the ^ raising of additional capital, the acquisition of other companies or assets, the payment of stock dividends, the subdivision of outstanding shares through stock splits, the adoption and implementation of additional share incentive plans and other corporate purposes approved by the Board of Directors. Except as discussed elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, the CT and CTF stockholders have no present plan to utilize any of the additional shares of Common Stock for which authorization is sought. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE FOREGOING AMENDMENT TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE AMENDMENT. THE COMPANY'S DIRECTORS AND NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ARE THE RECORD OWNERS 296,877 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK (APPROXIMATELY 3.3% OF THE OUTSTANDING SHARES) AND HAVE INDICATED THAT THEY INTEND TO VOTE THEIR SHARES FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE FOREGOING AMENDMENT. Designations, Powers, Preferences, Rights, Qualifications, Limitations and Restrictions Relating to Preferred Stock. The third of the proposed amendments to the Certificate would delete paragraphs 3 through 14 from Section B of existing Article FOURTH of the Certificate. Paragraphs 3 through 14 prescribe certain powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions for all series of preferred stock issued by the Company, including, among other things, (i) the declaration and payment of dividends on preferred stock, (ii) the distribution of the assets of the Company with respect to the preferred stock upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, (iii) the 52
PRER14A61st Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 61st
status of shares of preferred stock upon redemption or purchase thereof by the Company, (iv) restrictions on the declaration and payment of dividends on, and the redemption or purchase of, any shares of common stock or other class of stock of the Company ranking junior to the preferred stock, (v) restrictions concerning the creation of other classes of preferred stock, (vi) restrictions concerning the ability of the Company to increase the authorized number of shares of preferred stock and (v) the automatic right of holders of preferred stock to elect, as a separate class, two additional directors to the Board of Directors under certain circumstances. No shares of preferred stock are currently issued and outstanding. By deleting 3 through 14 of Section B of existing Article FOURTH of the Certificate, the Board of Directors would have the authority to determine, among other things, with respect to each series of preferred stock which may be issued (i) the distinctive designation and number of shares constituting such series, (ii) the dividend rates, if any, on the shares of that series and whether dividends would be payable in cash, property, rights or securities, (iii) whether dividends would be non-cumulative, cumulative to the extent earned, partially cumulative or cumulative and, if cumulative, the date from which dividends on the series would accumulate, (iv) whether, and upon what terms and conditions, the shares of that series would be convertible into or exchangeable for other securities or cash or other property or rights, (v) whether, and upon what terms and conditions, the shares of that series would be redeemable, (vi) the rights and the preferences, if any, to which the shares of that series would be entitled in the event of voluntary or involuntary dissolution or liquidation of the corporation, (vii) whether a sinking fund would be provided for the redemption of the series and, if so, the terms of and amounts payable into such sinking fund, (viii) whether the holders of such securities would have voting rights and the extent of those voting rights, (ix) whether the issuance of any additional shares of such series, or any other series, would be subject to restrictions as to issuance or as to the powers, preferences or rights of any such other series and (x) any other preferences, privileges and relative rights of such series as the Board of Directors may deem advisable. It is not possible to state the precise effect of the deletion of paragraphs 3 through 14 of Section B of existing Article FOURTH upon the rights of holders of Common Stock until the Board of Directors determines the respective preferences, limitations and relative rights of the holders of one or more series of the preferred stock. Such effect might include, however, (i) reduction of the amount otherwise available for payment of dividends 53
PRER14A62nd Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 62nd
on Common Stock, (ii) restrictions on dividends on Common Stock if dividends on the preferred stock are in arrears, (iii) dilution of the voting power of the Common Stock to the extent that the preferred stock has voting rights and (iv) reduction in the interests of the holders of Common Stock in the Company's assets upon liquidation to the extent of any liquidation preference granted to the preferred stock. Deletion of paragraphs 3 through 14 of Section B of existing Article FOURTH may be viewed as having the effect of discouraging an unsolicited attempt by another person or entity to acquire control of the Company. Issuances of authorized preferred shares can be implemented with voting or conversion privileges which make acquisition of control of the Company more difficult or more costly. Such an issuance could discourage or limit the stockholders' participation in certain types of transactions that might be proposed (such as a tender offer), whether or not such transactions were favored by a majority of the stockholders, and could enhance the ability of officers and directors to retain their positions with the Company. The CT and CTF stockholders believe that paragraphs 3 through 14 of Section B of existing Article FOURTH of the Certificate overly restrict the ability of the Board of Directors to issue shares of preferred stock with such powers, preferences and rights as may be suitable for achieving a valid corporate purpose. The CT and CTF stockholders believe that the complexity of modern business financing and acquisition transactions requires greater flexibility in the corporation's capital structure than now exists. By deleting paragraphs 3 through 14 of Section B of Article FOURTH, the Board of Directors would have the authority to issue shares of preferred stock from time to time with such powers, preferences and rights as the Board of Directors may determine appropriate to achieve a valid corporate purpose, including, the raising of additional capital and the acquisition of other companies or assets. The CT and CTF stockholders do not presently have any plan to issue any shares of preferred stock. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE FOREGOING AMENDMENT TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE AMENDMENT. THE COMPANY'S DIRECTORS AND NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ARE THE RECORD OWNERS 296,877 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK (APPROXIMATELY 3.3% OF THE OUTSTANDING SHARES) AND HAVE INDICATED THAT THEY INTEND TO VOTE THEIR SHARES FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE FOREGOING AMENDMENT. 54
PRER14A63rd Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 63rd
Liability of Directors for Monetary Damages for Certain Breaches of Fiduciary Duty. Pursuant to Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware Law, the Company is permitted to include in its Certificate a provision limiting the liability of its directors for monetary damages for breaches of their fiduciary duty of care. In accordance with such statute, it is proposed that the Certificate be amended by adding thereto the following: No director of the Company shall have personal liability to the Company or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director except (i) for any breach of such director's duty of loyalty to the Company or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under Section 174 of Delaware Law relating to unlawful distributions and (iv) for any transaction from which such director derives an improper personal benefit. The proposed limitations on a director's liability to the Company and its stockholders (i) will have no effect on the availability of equitable remedies such as injunction or rescission in the event of a breach of a director's fiduciary duty of care and (ii) relates only to future conduct and will not eliminate liability, even monetary, for conduct which pre-dates the effectiveness of the proposed amendment. The Company is not aware of any pending or threatened claims which would be affected or covered by the proposed amendment. The proposed limitations will reduce the availability of remedies to the Company and its stockholders for negligent misconduct by directors in certain circumstances. However, the CT and CTF stockholders believe that it is in the best interests of the Company to approve such limitations for two reasons. First, although the CT and CTF stockholders have received no indications that qualified persons would be unwilling to serve as independent directors in the absence of such limitations, the CT and CTF stockholders believe, based on discussions with some of the proposed nominees, that the presence of such provisions makes it easier to attract qualified independent directors to serve on the Company's Board of 55
PRER14A64th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 64th
Directors, Second, the CT and CTF stockholders believe that such limitations may reduce the Company's cost to maintain directors' and officers' liability insurance coverage. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE FOREGOING AMENDMENT TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE AMENDMENT. THE COMPANY'S DIRECTORS AND NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ARE THE RECORD OWNERS 296,877 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK (APPROXIMATELY 3.3% OF THE OUTSTANDING SHARES) AND HAVE INDICATED THAT THEY INTEND TO VOTE THEIR SHARES FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE FOREGOING AMENDMENT. Restatement of Certificate. The Company, directly or through one or more of its subsidiaries, conducts a variety of businesses. The conduct of some of those businesses is specifically authorized under Paragraphs 1 through 9 of existing Article THIRD of the Certificate while others are conducted under Paragraph 10 of existing Article THIRD which authorizes the Company "to conduct any lawful business, to exercise any lawful purpose and power, and to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized." The authority granted under Paragraph 10 of existing Article THIRD of the Certificate is sufficiently broad to authorize the Company to conduct all businesses in which it is currently engaged or may in the future engage. Accordingly, the CT and CTF Stockholders believe that Paragraphs 1 through 9 of existing Article THIRD are unnecessary and have proposed that they be deleted from the Certificate and that the text of Article THIRD of the Certificate be restated to read in its entirety as follows: The purpose of the Company is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized under Delaware Law. The CT and CTF stockholders have proposed that the text of paragraph 3 of Section A of existing Article FOURTH of the Certificate be restated as follows in order to clarify its meaning and conform it with Sections 243 and 244 of Delaware Law: 56
PRER14A65th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 65th
The Board of Directors may retire any and all shares of Common Stock that are issued but are not outstanding, including shares of Common Stock purchased or otherwise reacquired by the Company, and may reduce the capital of the Company in connection with the retirement of such shares in the manner provided for under Delaware Law. The CT and CTF stockholders have proposed that the text of paragraph 4 of Section A of existing Article FOURTH of the Certificate be restated in order to clarify that upon liquidation of the Company each holder of Common Stock will be entitled, after payment or provision for payment of the debts and other liabilities of the Company and the amounts to which the holders of the Preferred Stock are entitled, to share in the remaining net assets of the Company on a pro-rata basis based on the number of shares of Common Stock held by such holder and the total number of shares of Common Stock then outstanding. Section 245 of Delaware Law permits the Company to omit from a restated certificate of incorporation any provision of the original certificate of incorporation which named the incorporator. Accordingly, the CT and CTF stockholders have proposed that Article FIFTH of the existing Certificate be deleted from the proposed Amended and Restated Certificate of the Company. In addition to the amendments and restatements described above, the CT and CTF stockholders have proposed that (i) certain other provisions of the Certificate be restated for the purpose of clarifying such provisions or making them consistent with the proposed amendments described above, without changing the substance of such provisions, (ii) the various amendments made to the original Certificate since July 26, 1968 to the extent not amended in the foregoing amendments be incorporated into a single document, and (iii) the various articles and paragraphs of the Certificate be renumbered for ease of reference. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE FOREGOING AMENDMENT TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE AMENDMENT. THE COMPANY'S DIRECTORS AND NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ARE THE RECORD OWNERS 296,877 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK (APPROXIMATELY 3.3% OF THE OUTSTANDING SHARES) AND HAVE INDICATED THAT THEY INTEND TO VOTE THEIR SHARES FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE FOREGOING AMENDMENT. 57
PRER14A66th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 66th
58
PRER14A67th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 67th
PROPOSAL TO APPROVE 1994 STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS The CT and CTF Stockholders have proposed, subject to approval by the Board of Directors and the holders of Common Stock, the Burnup & Sims Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the "Directors' Plan"). The Directors' Plan is designed to maintain the Company's ability to attract and retain the services of experienced and highly qualified non-employee or outside directors and to increase the proprietary interest of such directors in the Company's continued success. In the event the Directors Plan is approved by the Board of Directors, the Directors' Plan will have been approved if a majority of the shares present, or represented, and entitled to vote at the Meeting ^ are voted in favor of it. The adoption of the Directors' Plan is contingent upon consummation of the Acquisition and, as such, will not be approved unless the Acquisition Agreement is approved by a vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock represented in person or by proxy at the Meeting. The ^ principal features of the Directors' Plan are summarized below, but this summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the terms of the Directors' Plan, which is attached hereto as Appendix F. Summary of Directors' Plan If authorized at the Meeting, grants of stock options will automatically be made to each individual who is elected to the Board of Directors at a meeting of stockholders held at any time after the day on which the Directors' Plan is approved by the stockholders, provided the individual (i) is not and has not been an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries and (ii) is not otherwise eligible to participate in any plan of the Company or any of its subsidiaries which would entitle such director to acquire securities or derivative securities of the Company. Grants of stock options will also be automatically made to each director who is at any time after the Directors' Plan is approved by the stockholders appointed by the Board of Directors to fill a vacancy on the Board, subject to the same eligibility requirements stated above. 59
PRER14A68th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 68th
An aggregate of 400,000 shares of Common Stock (subject to adjustment as described below and provided in the Directors' Plan) will be subject to the Plan. Shares subject to options which terminate or expire unexercised will become available for future option grants. Subject to the maximum number of shares which are subject to the Plan, options will be granted to each then eligible director on the day after the day on which the Directors' Plan is approved by the stockholders and on the day after each annual meeting of stockholders held thereafter, until that held in the year 2004. Subject to certain restrictions and limitations set forth below, each option will permit the non-employee director, for a period of up to ten years from the date of grant (unless the period is shortened as indicated below), to purchase from the Company 30,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock (subject to adjustment as provided in the Directors' Plan) at the fair market value of such shares on the date the option is granted as reported on NASDAQ. Except as noted below, an option shall not be exercisable prior to the expiration of one year from the date of grant. One half of the total number of shares covered by the option shall become exercisable on the first anniversary date of the grant and an additional one-quarter of the total number of shares covered by the option shall become exercisable on each of the two succeeding anniversary dates of the grant date. Except as noted below, an option may be exercised, only if the optionee at the time of exercise is, and at all times since the grant of the option, has been a director of the Company. Each option is nonassignable and non-transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. In the event a non-employee director terminates service on the Board of Directors by reason of retirement, each unexpired option held by the optionee will, to the extent otherwise exercisable on such date, remain exercisable until the earlier of ten years from the date of grant or three years following such retirement. The term "retirement" means termination after at least six years of service as a director. 60
PRER14A69th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 69th
In the event a non-employee director terminates service on the Board of Directors by reason of death or disability, any then unexpired option that has been outstanding for at least one year (six months in the case of death) will become exercisable in its entirety and those and all other exercisable options will continue to be exercisable until the earlier of ten years from the date of grant or three years after such termination. In the event a non-employee director terminates service on the Board of Directors other than by reason of retirement, death or disability, all unexercised options shall terminate upon such termination of service. In the event of a "change in control" of the Company at any time on or after March 1, 1994, then all of the optionee's outstanding options become immediately exercisable ^. However, the provisions regarding termination of service as a director continue to apply and in no event may an option be exercised prior to the expiration of six months from the date of grant or after ten years from the date of grant. Change in control is generally defined to include (i) a merger or consolidation in which the Company is not the surviving corporation or pursuant to which any shares of the Company are to be converted into cash, securities or other property, or any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of all, or substantially all, of the assets of the Company, (ii) the approval by the shareholders of any plan for the liquidation or dissolution of the Company, (iii) the acquisition by a "person" or "group," as defined in the Directors' Plan, of 33% or more of the Company's Common Stock or (iv) if individuals constituting the "Incumbent Board," as defined in the Directors' Plan, cease to constitute a majority of the whole Board of Directors of the Company. Payment of the option price upon exercise may be made in cash, by the delivery of Common Stock already owned by the non-employee director, a combination of cash and shares, or in accordance with a cashless exercise program under which shares of Common Stock may be issued directly to the optionee's broker or dealer upon receipt of the purchase price in cash from the broker or dealer. No optionee shall have any rights to dividends or other rights of a stockholder with respect to his or her shares subject to the option until the optionee has given written notice of exercise and has paid in full for such shares. The optionee shall be required to pay to the Company, such amount as the Company may demand to satisfy any tax withholding obligation. Tax withholding obligations may be met by a withholding of stock otherwise deliverable to the optionee under procedures approved by the Board of Directors. 61
PRER14A70th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 70th
The Directors' Plan will be administered by the Board of Directors who will be authorized to interpret the Directors' Plan. However, the Board will have no authority in respect of the selection of directors to receive options, the number of shares subject to the Directors' Plan, the number of options to be granted, the number of shares in each grant, the option price for shares subject to options, the period during which options may be granted or exercised, or the class of persons eligible to receive options. The Board also may not materially increase the benefits under the Directors' Plan or, without further approval of the stockholders, amend the Plan in any of the foregoing respects provided, however, that the Directors' Plan provisions affecting the amount of Common Stock to be awarded to eligible directors, the timing of those awards or the determination of those eligible to receive such awards may not be amended more than once every six months, other than to comport with changes in the Code, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or the rules thereunder. No stockholder approval will be required, however, if the Board of Directors obtains a legal opinion stating that such approval is not required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in order for the options granted under the Plan to continue to be exempt from the operation of Section 16(b) of such Act. Adjustments shall be made in the number and class of shares available under the Directors' Plan and the number, class and price of shares subject to outstanding option grants, in each such case to reflect changes in the Company's Common Stock through changes in the Company's corporate structure or capitalization, such as through a merger or stock split. Federal Income Tax Consequences The following is a brief description of the federal income tax consequences, under existing law, of the Directors' Plan: The options under the Directors' Plan are nonstatutory options not intended to qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. The grant of options will not result in taxable income to the non-employee director or a tax deduction to 62
PRER14A71st Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 71st
the Company. The exercise of an option by a non-employee director will result in taxable ordinary income to the non-employee director and, if applicable withholding requirements are satisfied, a corresponding deduction for the Company, in each case equal to the difference between the fair market value of the acquired shares on the date the option was exercised and the fair market value of such shares on the date the option was granted (the option price). An optionee's tax basis for shares acquired upon exercise of an option will be equal to the fair market value of such shares on the date the option is exercised. The holding period for such shares will commence on such date and, accordingly, will not include the period during which the option was held. The payment of the option exercise price by delivery of Common Stock of the Company will constitute a non-taxable exchange by the optionee. Use of Common Stock in payment of the option price will result in the same tax consequences to the Company as if the exercise were effected by a cash payment. In the event of a sale of shares received upon exercise of an option, any gain or loss will generally be a capital gain or loss. The capital gain or loss will be a long-term capital gain or loss if the shares were held for more than one year after the date on which the option was exercised. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS NOT YET VOTED ON THE 1994 STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS. IN THE EVENT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS APPROVES THE COMPANY'S 1994 STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THE HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY'S 1994 STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS. THE COMPANY'S DIRECTORS AND NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ARE THE RECORD OWNERS OF 296,877 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK (APPROXIMATELY 3.3% OF OUTSTANDING SHARES) AND HAVE INDICATED THAT THEY INTEND TO VOTE THEIR SHARES FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE 1994 STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS. 63
PRER14A72nd Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 72nd
PROPOSAL TO APPROVE 1994 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN The CT and CTF Stockholders have proposed, subject to approval by the Board of Directors and the holders of Common Stock, the Burnup & Sims Inc. 1994 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Incentive Plan") for key employees, including officers, of the Company and its subsidiaries to replace the Current Plans. The Incentive Plan is more flexible than the Current Plans, containing provisions which the Company believes are similar to those presently approved by other large corporations. The Incentive Plan is designed to provide for the grant of options that qualify as "incentive stock options" under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), or options other than "incentive stock options," as well as provide for the award of restricted stock and bonuses payable in stock. In addition to the replacement of the Current Plan, the purpose of approving the Incentive Plan, consistent with the purposes of the Current Plans is to continue to have available a stock compensation plan that will encourage and enable participating employees of the Company to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company through stock ownership and will assist the Company in attracting and retaining key employees. In the event the Board of Directors approves the Incentive Plan, the Incentive Plan will have been approved if a majority of the shares present or represented, and entitled to vote at the Meeting are voted in favor of it. The adoption of the Incentive Plan is contingent upon consummation of the Acquisition and, as such, will not be approved unless the Acquisition Agreement is approved by a vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock represented in person or by proxy at the Meeting. The principal features of the Incentive Plan are summarized below, but this summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the terms of the Incentive Plan, which is attached hereto as Appendix G. Summary of Incentive Plan Subject to adjustment as noted below, the total number of shares that may be optioned or awarded under the Incentive Plan is 800,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock of which 64
PRER14A73rd Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 73rd
200,000 shares may be awarded as restricted stock. If the Incentive Plan is approved by stockholders, no further awards will be made under the Current Plans. However, approximately 252,000 shares will continue to be reserved with respect to the shares outstanding under Current Plans. No employee may receive, over the term of the Incentive Plan, awards in the form of options, whether incentive stock options or options other than incentive stock options, to purchase more than 200,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock. Any shares subject to an option under the Incentive Plan which for any reason expires, is relinquished or is terminated unexercised and any restricted stock which is forfeited may again be optioned or awarded under the Incentive Plan, provided, however, that forfeited shares shall not be available for further awards if the employee has realized any benefits of ownership from such shares. Key salaried employees, including officers, of the Company and its subsidiaries, shall be eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee") will administer the Incentive Plan and determine the recipients of options and awards, their terms and conditions within the parameters of the Incentive Plan and the number of shares covered by each option or award. The Committee may approve rules and regulations to carry out the Incentive Plan and its decision with regard to any question arising under the Plan shall be final and conclusive on all employees of the Company or its subsidiaries participating or eligible to participate in the Plan. The Committee shall consist of not less than three outside non-employee directors of the Company. Such directors are not eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan. No award or option may be granted under the Incentive Plan after January, 2004, but awards or options theretofore granted may extend beyond that date. The Board of Directors of the Company may amend, alter or discontinue the Incentive Plan, but no amendment, alteration or discontinuation may be made which would (i) impair the rights of any recipient of restricted stock or option or stock bonus already granted, without his or her written consent, or (ii) without the approval of the stockholders (A) increase the total number of shares reserved for the Incentive Plan, (B) decrease the option price of an incentive stock option to less than 100% of the fair market value of the stock on the date the option was granted, (C) change the class of persons eligible to receive an award of restricted stock or options under the Incentive Plan, or (D) extend the duration of the Incentive Plan. The Committee may, retroactively or prospectively, amend the terms of 65
PRER14A74th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 74th
any award of restricted stock or option already granted, provided no such amendment will impair the rights of any holder without his or her written consent. The option price per share shall be determined by the Committee, but shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of Common Stock at the time the option is granted as reported on NASDAQ. Options granted under the Incentive Plan will expire on a date fixed by the Committee, but not more than ten years from the date of grant in the case of incentive stock options or such later date as may be permitted under the Code. Each option will state whether it is immediately exercisable in full or when and to what extent it shall be exercisable. In the absence of any contrary provision, no option will be exercisable within six months from the date of grant. Payment of the option price upon exercise of an option may be made in cash, by the delivery of Common Stock already owned by the optionee, a combination of cash and shares, or in accordance with a cashless exercise program under which shares of Common Stock may be issued directly to the optionee's broker or dealer upon receipt of the purchase price in cash from the broker or dealer. No optionee shall have any rights to dividends or other rights of a stockholder with respect to his or her shares subject to the option until the optionee has given written notice of exercise and has paid in full for such shares. Tax withholding obligations may be met by a withholding of stock otherwise deliverable to the optionee under procedures approved by the Committee. Each option granted under the Incentive Plan may provide for stock appreciation rights, that is, the right to exercise such option in whole or in part without payment of the option price. If an option is exercised without payment, the optionee shall be entitled to receive the excess of the fair market value of the stock covered by the option on the date of exercise over the option exercise price. Such amount is payable in stock or in cash or in a combination of stock and cash at the discretion of the Committee. If an optionee's employment terminates by reason of his or her retirement under a retirement plan of the Company or a subsidiary or death, the optionee's option may thereafter be exercised by the optionee or by his or her estate or beneficiary within the period specified in the option (not to exceed 3 years from the date of termination) but not 66
PRER14A75th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 75th
beyond the termination date of the option. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, if an optionee's employment terminates for any reason other than death or retirement, the optionee's option shall thereupon terminate. During the optionee's lifetime, the option is exercisable only by the optionee and shall not be transferable except by will or the laws of descent and distribution. No incentive stock option will be granted to an employee who owns or would own immediately before the grant of such option, directly or indirectly, stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company. This restriction will not apply if, at the time such incentive stock option is granted, the option price is at least 110% of the fair market value of one share of Common Stock on the date of grant and the incentive stock option by its terms is not exercisable after the expiration of five years from the date of grant. Awards of restricted stock may be in addition to or in lieu of option grants. During the restriction period (as set by the Committee) the recipient of restricted stock is not permitted to sell, transfer, pledge, or assign the shares. Shares of restricted stock shall become free of all restrictions if the recipient dies or his or her employment is terminated by reason of permanent disability during the restriction period, and to the extent set by the Committee, if the recipient retires under a retirement plan of the Company or any subsidiary. In the event of a termination of employment during the restriction period for any reason other than death, disability or, to the extent determined by the Committee, retirement under a retirement plan of the Company or a subsidiary, shares of restricted stock will be forfeited and revert to the Company, except to the extent that the Committee determines that such forfeiture is not in the best interests of the Company and waives the forfeiture provision with respect to all or some of the restricted stock held by the employee. The recipient of restricted stock shall be entitled to vote the shares and receive all dividends paid thereon, except that dividends paid in Company Common Stock or other property shall also be subject to the same restrictions. Tax withholding obligations shall be paid in cash by the recipient or may be met by the withholding of Common Stock otherwise deliverable to the recipient pursuant to procedures approved by the Committee. 67
PRER14A76th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 76th
In lieu of cash bonuses otherwise payable to eligible employees under the Company's compensation practices, the Committee may determine that such bonuses shall be payable in Common Stock or partly in Common Stock and partly in cash. Any such shares of Common Stock shall be free of any restrictions imposed by the Plan. The Company shall withhold from any such cash bonuses an amount of cash sufficient to meet its tax withholding obligations. If the cash portion of the bonus is not sufficient, the tax withholding obligations shall be paid in cash by the recipient or may be met by the withholding of Common Stock otherwise deliverable to the recipient pursuant to procedures approved by the Committee. In the event of a "change in control" of the Company, in addition to any action required or authorized by the option or award, the Committee may in its discretion recommend that the Board of Directors take certain actions as a result of, or in anticipation, of the change in control, to assure fair and equitable treatment of the employees who hold options or restricted stock, including an offer to purchase any outstanding option or restricted stock granted or issued pursuant to the Incentive Plan for its cash value as determined by the Committee. However, in no event may an option be made exercisable prior to the expiration of six months from the date of grant or, in the case of an incentive stock option, after ten years from the date it was granted. Change in control is generally defined to include (i) a merger or consolidation in which the Company is not the surviving corporation ^ or pursuant to which any shares of the Company are to be converted into cash, securities or other property, or any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of all, or substantially all, of the assets of the Company, (ii) the approval by the stockholders of any plan for the liquidation or dissolution of the Company, (iii) the acquisition by a "person" or "group," as defined in the Incentive Plan, of 33% or more of the Company's Common Stock or (iv) if individuals constituting the "Incumbent Board," as defined in the Incentive Plan, cease to constitute a majority of the whole Board of Directors of the Company. Adjustments shall be made in the number and class of shares available under the Incentive Plan and the number, class and price of shares subject to outstanding option grants, in each such case to reflect changes in the Company's Common Stock through changes 68
PRER14A77th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 77th
in the Company's corporate structure or capitalization such as through a merger or stock split. Federal Income Tax Consequences ^ The following is a brief description of the federal income tax consequences, under existing law, of the Incentive Plan: Incentive Stock Options (a) Neither the grant nor the exercise (while the employee is employed or within three months after termination of employment, or twelve months in the case of termination on account of disability) of an incentive stock option will be treated as the receipt of taxable income by the employee or a deductible item by the Company. The amount by which the fair market value of the shares issued upon exercise exceeds the option price will constitute an item of "tax preference" to the employee for purposes of the alternative minimum tax. For alternative minimum tax purposes only the tax basis of the Common Stock acquired upon the exercise of such option, is increased by the amount of such excess. (b) If the employee holds shares acquired by him or her upon the exercise of an option for the two-year period from the date of grant of the option and the one-year period beginning on the day after such exercise, and if he or she has been an employee of the Company or its subsidiaries at all times from the date of grant to the day three months before exercise, or twelve months in the case of termination on account of disability, then any gain realized by the employee on a later sale or exchange of such shares will be a long-term capital gain and any loss sustained will be a long-term capital loss. The Company will realize no tax deduction with respect to any such sale or exchange of option shares. 69
PRER14A78th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 78th
(c) If the employee disposes of any shares acquired upon the exercise of an option during the two-year period from the date of grant of the option or the one-year period beginning on the day after such exercise, the employee will generally be obligated to report as ordinary income for the year in which the disposition occurred the amount by which the fair market value of such shares on the date of the exercise of the option (or, as noted in clause (d) below, in the case of certain sales or exchanges of such shares for less than such fair market value, the amount realized upon such sale or exchange) exceeds the option price, and the Company will be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of such ordinary income. Any such ordinary income will increase the employee's tax basis for the purpose of determining gain or loss. (d) If an option holder who has acquired stock upon the exercise of an incentive stock option makes a disposition within the two-year period described above, and the disposition is a sale or exchange with respect to which a loss (if sustained) would be recognized to the option holder, then the amount includible in the option holder's gross income, and the amount deductible by the Company, will not exceed the excess (if any) of the amount realized on the sale or exchange over the tax basis of the stock. Non-Qualified Stock Options In the case of an option granted under the Incentive Plan that is not an incentive stock option, the grant of the option will not result in taxable income to the option holder or a tax deduction to the Company. The option holder recognizes ordinary income at the time the option is exercised in the amount by which the fair market value of the shares acquired exceeds the option price. The Company is entitled to a corresponding ordinary income tax deduction at that time, if applicable withholding requirements are satisfied. The option holder's tax basis for purposes of determining gain or loss on a subsequent sale of the shares is the fair market value of the shares at the date of exercise of the option. The holding period for such shares will commence on such date and, accordingly, will not include the period during which the option was held. In the event of a sale of shares received upon exercise of the option, any gain or 70
PRER14A79th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 79th
loss will generally be a capital gain or loss. The capital gain or loss will be a long-term capital gain or loss if the shares were held for more than one year after the date on which the option was exercised. Use of Stock to Exercise Options The payment of the option exercise price by delivery of Common Stock of the Company will constitute a non-taxable exchange by the optionee and will not affect the incentive stock option status of the stock acquired in the case of an incentive stock option. However, if the Common Stock delivered in payment was previously acquired pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option and has not been held for the requisite one-year period, the exchange would constitute a premature disposition of such Common Stock for purposes of the incentive stock option holding requirements. Use of Common Stock in payment of the option price will result in the same tax consequences to the Company as if the exercise were effected by a cash payment. Stock Appreciation Rights The amount received by an optionee who exercises a stock appreciation right with respect to his or her option is taxable as ordinary income at the time of exercise and the Company is entitled to a corresponding ordinary income tax deduction. Bonus Stock The grantee will realize ordinary income during his or her taxable year in which the shares of Common Stock are issued pursuant to the award of Bonus Stock in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock at the date of issue. The Company is entitled to a corresponding ordinary income tax deduction. If the grantee thereafter disposes of such shares of Common Stock, 71
PRER14A80th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 80th
any amount received in excess of the market value of the shares on the date of issue will be treated as long-or short-term capital gain depending upon the holding period of the shares. Restricted Stock A grantee will not realize any taxable income upon the award of Restricted Stock unless a grantee elects under Section 83(b) of the Code to have the fair market value of the Common Stock (determined without regard to the possibility of forfeiture) included in his or her gross income in the year the Restricted Stock is issued. In the absence of such an election, the grantee will realize ordinary income during his or her taxable year in which the possibility of forfeiture lapses. If the grantee thereafter disposes of the Common Stock, any amount received in excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date the possibility of forfeiture lapsed will be treated as long- or short-term gain depending upon the holding period (measured from the date the possibility of forfeiture lapsed) of the shares. The Company will be entitled to an ordinary tax deduction in the same amount and at the same time the grantee is considered to have realized ordinary income. Change in Control Under certain circumstances, accelerated vesting or exercise of options or stock appreciation rights, or the accelerated lapse of restrictions on restricted stock, in connection with a "change in control" of the Company might be deemed an "excess parachute payment" for purposes of the golden parachute tax provisions of Section 280G of the Code. To the extent it is so considered, the optionee or grantee may be subject to a 20% excise tax and the Company may be denied a tax deduction. 72
PRER14A81st Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 81st
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS NOT YET ACTED ON THE 1994 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN. IN THE EVENT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS APPROVES THE COMPANY'S 1994 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THE HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY'S 1994 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN. THE COMPANY'S DIRECTORS AND NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ARE THE RECORD OWNERS OF 296,877 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK (APPROXIMATELY 3.3% OF THE OUTSTANDING SHARES) AND HAVE INDICATED THAT THEY INTEND TO VOTE THEIR SHARES FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE 1994 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN . 73
PRER14A82nd Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 82nd
ELECTION OF DIRECTOR The Board of Directors is currently comprised of five directors elected in three classes (the "Classes"), with two Class I, one Class II and two Class III directors. Directors in each Class hold office for three-year terms. The terms of the Classes are staggered so that the term of one Class terminates each year. The term of the current Class II Director expires at the Meeting and when his respective successor has been duly elected and qualified. Samuel C. Hathorn, Jr., the current Class II Director, has been nominated by the Board of Directors to be reelected as the Class II Director at the Meeting. The Company has no reason to believe that Mr. Hathorn will refuse or be unable to accept election; however, in the event he is unable to accept election or if any other unforeseen contingencies should arise, each proxy that does not direct otherwise will be voted for such other person as may be designated by the Board of Directors. MANAGEMENT Information as to Nominees and Other Directorships The following information concerning principal occupation or employment during the past five years, other directorships and age, has been furnished to the Company by the nominee for director in Class II, by the directors in Classes III and I whose terms expire at the Company's Annual Meetings of Stockholders in 1994 and 1995, respectively, and when their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified, all executive officers of the Company, and the individuals who will become additional executive officers and directors of the Company if the Acquisition is consummated. Nominee for Director 74
PRER14A83rd Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 83rd
Class II (Term, if elected, expires at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 1996) Principal Occupation or Employment Director Name Age During the Past Five Years Since Samuel C. Hathorn, Jr. 50 President of Trendmaker Homes, and 1981 since December 1, 1990, President of Centennial Homes, Inc., subsidiaries of Weyerhaeuser Co., Houston and Dallas, Texas, homebuilders and real estate developers Directors Whose Terms of Office will Continue After the Annual Meeting Class III (Terms expire at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 1994) Principal Occupation or Employment Director Name Age During the Past Five Years Since Cecil D. Conlee 57 Chairman, CGR Advisors, Atlanta, 1973 Georgia, real estate investment advisors Leo J. Hussey 54 Executive Vice President of the 1976 Company and President of Southeastern Printing Company, Inc., and The Deviney Company, wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company 75 Class I (Terms expire at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 1995) Principal Occupation or Employment Director Name Age During the Past Five Years Since Nick A. Caporella 57 Chairman of the Board of 1974 Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President of NBC William A. Morse 66 Attorney-at-Law, Danville, 1977 California President, Behring-Hofmann Educational Institute, Danville, California Mr. Caporella is a director of NBC. Mr. Conlee is a director of Cousins Properties, Inc. and Oxford Industries, Inc. Mr. Morse is a director of Behring-Hofmann Educational Institute, Inc. Executive Officers
PRER14A84th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 84th
Principal Occupation or Employment Name Age During the Past Five Years George R. Bracken 48 Vice President & Treasurer of the Company, since March 1992; Vice President Financial Planning of the Company since May 1985 Michael Brenner 45 General Counsel of the Company since June 1988 Gerald W. Hartman 53 Senior Vice President of the Company since September 1988 Margaret M. Madden 41 Vice President of the Company since September 1987; Corporate Secretary since August 1984 Linda L. Rine 46 Vice President - Insurance of the Company since September 1987 Proposed Directors and Executive Officers. The following individuals will be appointed as officers and directors of the Company, in the capacities indicated below, assuming consummation of the Acquisition. See "ELECTION OF DIRECTOR" and "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. - Terms of the Acquisition Agreement -- Directors and Management of the Company Following the Acquisition." Percentage Percentage Ownership Ownership of Principal Occupation of Common Common or Employment Proposed Stock Before Stock After Age During the Past Five Years Class Acquisition Acquisition Name 76
PRER14A85th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 85th
Jorge L. Mas Canosa 54 Proposed Director; during II -0- 33.6% the past five years has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of CTF Jorge Mas 30 Proposed Director, I -0- 24.8% President and Chief Executive Officer; during the past five years has served for part or all of such period as President and Chief Executive Officer of CT (and its predecessor company Communication Contractors, Inc.), Neff Rental, Inc., Neff Machinery, Inc., Atlantic Real Estate Holding Corp. and U.S. Development Corp., each a company controlled by the CT and CTF stockholders Eliot C. Abbott 44 Proposed Director; during II -0- -0- the past five years has been a shareholder in the law firm of Carlos & Abbott, P.A., Miami, Florida 77
PRER14A86th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 86th
Arthur B. Laffer 53 Proposed Director; III -0- -0- President, Canto Advisors Incorporated, an investment advisor, since May 1993; Chief Executive Officer, Calport Asset Management, a money management firm, since June 1992; Chairman, A.B. Laffer, V.A. Canto & Associates, an economic research and financial consulting firm (formerly known as A.B. Laffer Associates), since 1979; Chief Executive Officer, Laffer Advisors Incorporated, an investment advisor and broker-dealer, since 1975 Mr. Laffer is a director of U.S. Filter Corporation, Nicholas Applegate Growth Equity Fund and Nicholas Applegate Mutual Fund. Mr. Mas Canosa is a director of The Wackenhut Corporation and Landair Transport, Inc. Jorge L. Mas Canosa is the father of Jorge Mas. Directors Following Consummation of the Acquisition In the event Mr. Hathorn is elected and the Acquisition is consummated, the Company's Board of Directors will be comprised of the following individuals: 78
PRER14A87th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 87th
Name Class Term Expires Cecil D. Conlee III 1994 Arthur B. Laffer III 1994 Jorge Mas I 1995 William A. Morse I 1995 Eliot C. Abbott II 1996 Jorge L. Mas Canosa II 1996 Samuel C. Hathorn, Jr. II 1996 Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors During Fiscal 1993, (i) the Board of Directors held four meetings and all of the members of the Board of Directors attended each of such meetings and (ii) each member of the Board of Directors also attended all meetings of those committees of which he was a member. The Board of Directors has standing Audit, Compensation and Stock Option, Finance, Stock Purchase Plan, Nominating, Special Transaction and Executive Strategic Planning Committees. The members of the Company's Audit Committee are Messrs. Conlee, Hathorn and Morse. During Fiscal 1993, the Audit Committee met four times. The principal functions of the Audit Committee are to review with management and the Company's independent accountants the scope of proposed audits, the Company's annual financial statements, the results of audits and the Company's system of internal accounting controls and to be available to meet with the independent accountants to resolve matters, if any, that may arise in connection with audits or otherwise. The members of the Company's Compensation and Stock Option Committee are Messrs. Hathorn and Morse. During Fiscal 1993, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee met twice. The principal functions of the Compensation and Stock Option Committee are to recommend to and review with the Board of Directors the compensation arrangements for the executive officers of the Company, and to review with management grants under the Company's 79
PRER14A88th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 88th
non-qualified stock option plans, and overall compensation arrangements and employee benefits for the Company's employees. The members of the Company's Finance Committee are Messrs. Morse, Conlee, Hathorn and Hussey. The principal function of the Finance Committee, which met twice during Fiscal 1993, is to review the Company's long and short-term financial strategies with management and the Board of Directors. The members of the Company's Stock Purchase Plan Committee are Messrs. Morse, Hussey and Hathorn. During Fiscal 1993, the Stock Purchase Plan Committee, whose principal function is to monitor the administration of the Company's Employee Stock Purchase Plan, met once. The members of the Company's Nominating Committee are Messrs. Hathorn, Caporella and Hussey. The Nominating Committee, which met once during Fiscal 1993, recommends to the Board of Directors candidates for election to the Board of Directors. The Committee considers candidates recommended by the stockholders pursuant to written applications submitted to the Corporate Secretary. The members of the Company's Special Transaction Committee are Messrs. Conlee, Morse and Hathorn. The primary function of the Special Transaction Committee, which met twice during Fiscal 1993, is to review related party transactions between the Company and any officer, director or affiliate of the Company. The Committee was responsible for reviewing and approving the terms of the Acquisition and negotiating and approving the Redemption on behalf of stockholders of the Company (other than NBC and its affiliates). The members of the Executive Strategic Planning Committee are Messrs. Conlee, Morse, Hathorn, and Caporella. During Fiscal 1993, the Executive Strategic Planning Committee met twice. The principal function of the Executive Strategic Planning Committee is to review future strategic courses available to the Company. 80
PRER14A89th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 89th
If the Acquisition is consummated, the composition of some or all of the foregoing committees may change. Director Compensation The directors, except directors who are employees of the Company or of any subsidiary, are paid attendance fees at the rate of $600 for each meeting of the Board of Directors and $400 for each committee meeting attended ($1,000 for Executive Strategic Planning Committee meetings), regardless of the number of committees on which they serve. In addition, directors who are not employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries are paid retainer fees at the rate of $15,000 per annum and Chairmen of committees are paid an additional $200 for each meeting of their respective committees attended by them. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Summary Compensation Table The following table sets forth certain information for the last three fiscal years concerning the compensation earned by or awarded to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and each of the other three most highly compensated executive officers of the Company whose combined salary and bonus exceeded $100,000 in such fiscal year. The table does not set forth certain of the tabular formats set forth in the SEC's recently expanded rules on executive compensation disclosure in proxy statements dealing with other annual compensation and long-term compensation awards and pay-outs, since none of these executive officers received any such compensation during such three-year period. 81
PRER14A90th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 90th
Annual Compensation Name and Principal Position Year Salary ($) Bonus ($) Nick A. Caporella, Chairman of the 1993 0 0 Board, President and Chief 1992 0 0 Executive Officer 1991 600,000 375,000 Gerald W. Hartman, Senior Vice President of the Company and President of Burnup & Sims ComTec, Inc. 1993 211,870 60,000 and Burnup & Sims of California, Inc., 1992 200,922 40,000 wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company 1991 200,288 70,000 Leo J. Hussey, Executive Vice President, and Director of the Company, and President1993 193,694 30,000 of Southeastern Printing Company, Inc. 1992 155,000 25,000 and The Deviney Company, wholly- 1991 155,000 25,000 owned subsidiaries of the Company George R. Bracken, Vice President & 1993 105,945 28,000 Treasurer 1992 101,345 25,000 1991 101,474 20,000 Options Granted in Last Fiscal Year No stock options were granted during Fiscal 1993. Aggregate Fiscal Year-End Stock Option Value Table 82
PRER14A91st Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 91st
The following table summarizes the options held at April 30, 1993 by individuals named in the Summary Compensation Table; no stock options were exercised by such persons during Fiscal 1993. Number of Unexercised Value of Unexercised Options at In-the-Money Options April 30, 1993(#) at April 30, 1993 ($) Name Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable Nick A. Caporella 200,000 0 0 0 Leo J. Hussey 2,000 0 0 0 Gerald W. Hartman 2,800 0 0 0 George R. Bracken 500 0 0 0 Long-Term Incentive and Pension Plans The Company does not have any long-term incentive or pension plans. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of the Company's previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate future filings, including this Proxy Statement, in whole or in part, the following Compensation and Stock Option Committee Report and Performance Graph on page 38 shall not be incorporated by reference into any such filings. Report of the Compensation and Stock Option Committee The Compensation and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Compensation Committee" or the "Committee") is responsible for approving the compensation 83
PRER14A92nd Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 92nd
levels of the executive officers of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee also reviews with the Chief Executive Officer guidelines for salary adjustments and aggregate bonus awards applicable to management and employees other than executive officers. The Committee, which is composed of two non-employee directors of the Company, reviews its recommendations with the members of the Board. The following report is submitted by the Committee regarding compensation paid during fiscal year 1993: The compensation program of the Company is designed to enable the Company to attract, motivate, reasonably reward, and retain professional personnel who will effectively manage the assets of the Company and maximize corporate performance and stockholder value over time. Compensation packages include a mix of salary, incentive bonus awards, and stock options. Salaries of executive officers are established based on an individual's performance and general market conditions. Salary levels are determined based upon the challenge and responsibility of an individual's position with the Company and are dependent on subjective considerations. In addition to paying a base salary, the Company provides incentive bonus awards as a component of overall compensation. Bonus awards are measured based upon overall performance of the executive officer's area of responsibility or operating performance of the operation under control of the executive, if any. Due to the fact that the Company's financial results for the last three years reflect volume declines and net losses, salaries of executive officers during fiscal 1994 (with certain exceptions for outstanding merit) are frozen at previous levels. In addition, in light of these factors, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, Nick A. Caporella, declined to accept any salary or bonus compensation for either fiscal year 1992 and 1993. Long-term incentive compensation for executives consists of stock-based awards made under the Company's two non-qualified stock option plans (the "Option Plans"). The Option Plans provide for the granting of options to purchase Common Stock to key employees at prices equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. The Committee believes that the maximization of stockholder wealth through appreciation in the value of Common Stock is created through the use of stock options. At April 30, 1993, there were 205,300 stock options granted under the Option Plans held by executive officers. 84
PRER14A93rd Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 93rd
Compensation and Stock Option Committee Samuel C. Hathorn, Jr. William A. Morse 85
PRER14A94th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 94th
The proposed Board of Directors has no plans to materially change the Company's overall compensation structure after the Acquisition. The Board of Directors, however, will meet after the Acquisition to determine the compensation of Jorge Mas who will serve as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. It is anticipated that Mr. Mas' will be paid annual base compensation of $300,000 and bonus compensation as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. If the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan is approved, both Mr. Mas and other key salaried employees of the Company will be eligible to receive options and awards as determined from time to time by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, which shall consist of not less than three non-employee directors. If the Stock Option Plan for non-employee directors is approved, directors who have never been employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, and who are not otherwise eligible to participate in any plan of the Company or any of its subsidiaries which would entitle such directors to receive securities of the Company, would automatically receive stock options upon their election as directors. PERFORMANCE GRAPH The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on Common Stock from April 30, 1988 through April 30, 1993 with the cumulative total return of the S & P 500 Stock Index and a Company constructed index of two peer companies consisting of Dycom Industries, Inc. and the L.E. Myers Company. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in Common Stock was $100 on April 30, 1988 and that all dividends were reinvested. 86
PRER14A95th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 95th
Comparison of Five Year Cumulative Total Return Among Burnup & Sims Inc., S & P 500 Stock Index, and Peer Group Companies 210 DOLLARS 190 170 150 130 110 90 70 50 30 10 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 + Burnup & Sims * S & P 500 . (A) Peer Group CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS AND LITIGATION The Company has billed NBC approximately $662,000 for certain services rendered and expenses for the year ended April 30, 1993. NBC owns approximately 36% of the outstanding Common Stock. Nick A. Caporella, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the 87
PRER14A96th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 96th
Board of the Company is also the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and the controlling stockholder of NBC. As described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, it is a condition to the consummation of the Acquisition by the stockholders of CT and CTF and the Company that (i) the Company shall have entered into a written agreement with NBC, pursuant to which the Company will redeem and purchase 3,153,847 shares of Common Stock owned by NBC (which constitutes all of the Common Stock owned by NBC), (ii) all of the conditions to the consummation of the Redemption shall have been satisfied or waived, and (iii) the stockholders of CT and CTF shall have received a written certificate from the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company that all of the conditions to the consummation of the Redemption shall have been satisfied or waived, except the condition to the Redemption that the Acquisition shall have occurred, which certificate shall be supported by a certificate from the Chief Executive Officer of NBC, to the same effect. Accordingly, the Acquisition will be consummated prior to the Redemption. The Redemption was negotiated and approved by the Special Transaction Committee on behalf of the stockholders of the Company (other than NBC and its affiliates). The Redemption will not be consummated unless the Acquisition shall have occurred. Accordingly, assuming satisfaction of all other conditions to the consummation of the Acquisition, approval by stockholders of the Company of the Acquisition Agreement shall result in consummation of the Redemption. A vote in favor of the Acquisition Agreement may preclude a stockholder of the Company from challenging the Acquisition and the other transactions described in this Proxy Statement and from participating in, and receiving damages, if any, as a result of any action which has been or may be filed on behalf of any or all of the stockholders with respect to such transactions. See below for a description of a class action and derivative complaint relating to, among other things, the Agreement and certain other transactions described in this Proxy Statement. The consideration for the Redemption and purchase, will be the cancellation of the outstanding principal of $17,500,000 under the Subordinated Debenture owed to the Company by NBC and crediting the next succeeding principal payments in the amount of $592,313 of Other Indebtedness with an outstanding principal amount of $1,371,430 owed to the Company by NBC. On November 16, 1993, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the Redemption. The Board of Directors of NBC has not yet met to consider the terms of the Redemption. See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH & TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. - Interest of Certain Persons in Matters to be Acted Upon." 88
PRER14A97th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 97th
Albert H. Kahn v. Nick A. Caporella, et al., Civil Action No. 11890 was filed in December 1990 by a stockholder of the Company in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County against the Company, the members of the Board of Directors, and against NBC, as a purported class action and derivative lawsuit. In May 1993, plaintiff filed a motion to amend its class action and shareholder derivative complaint (the "Amended Complaint"). The class action claims allege, among other things, that the Board of Directors, and NBC as its largest stockholder, breached their respective fiduciary duties in approving (i) the distribution to the Company's stockholders of all of the common stock of NBC owned by it (the "Distribution") and (ii) the exchange by NBC of 3,846,153 shares of Common Stock for certain indebtedness of NBC held by the Company (the "Exchange") (the Distribution and the Exchange are hereinafter referred to as the "1991 Transaction"), in allegedly placing the interests of NBC ahead of the interests of the other stockholders of the Company. The derivative action claims allege, among other things, that the Board of Directors has breached its fiduciary duties by approving executive officer compensation arrangements, by financing NBC's operations on a current basis, and by permitting the interests of the Company to be subordinated to those of NBC. In the lawsuit, plaintiff seeks to rescind the 1991 Transaction and to recover damages in an unspecified amount. The Amended Complaint alleges that the Special Transaction Committee that approved the 1991 Transaction was not independent and that, therefore, the 1991 Transaction was not protected by the business judgment rule or in accordance with a settlement agreement (the "1990 Settlement") entered into in 1990 pertaining to certain prior litigation. The Amended Complaint also makes other allegations which involve (i) further violations of the 1990 Settlement by the Company's engaging in certain transactions not approved by the Special Transaction Committee; (ii) the sale of a subsidiary of the Company to a former officer of the Company; (iii) the timing of the 1991 Transaction and (iv) the treatment of executive stock options in the 1991 Transaction. In November 1993, plaintiff filed a class action and derivative complaint, Civil Action No. 13248 (the "1993 Complaint") against the Company, the members of the Board of Directors, CT, CTF, Jorge Mas Canosa, Jorge Mas and Juan Carlos Mas (CT, CTF, Jorge Mas Canosa, Jorge Mas and Juan Carlos Mas are referred to as the "CT Defendants"). In December 1993, plaintiff amended the 1993 Complaint ("1993 Amended Complaint"). The 1993 Amended Complaint alleges, among other things, that (i) the Board of Directors and NBC, as the 89
PRER14A98th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 98th
Company's largest stockholder, breached their respective fiduciary duties by approving the Acquisition Agreement and the Redemption which, according to the allegations of the 1993 Complaint, benefits Mr. Caporella at the expense of the Company's stockholders, (ii) the CT Defendants had knowledge of the fiduciary duties owed by NBC and the Board of Directors and knowingly and substantially participated in their breach thereof; (iii) the Special Transaction Committee of the Board of Directors which approved the Acquisition Agreement and the Redemption was not independent and, as such, was not in accordance with the 1990 Settlement; (iv) the Board of Directors breached its fiduciary duties by failing to take an active and direct role in the sale of the Company and failing to ensure the maximization of shareholder value in the sale of control of the Company; and (v) the Board of Directors and NBC, as the Company's largest stockholder, breached their respective fiduciary duties by failing to disclose completely all material information regarding the Acquisition Agreement and the Redemption. The 1993 Complaint also claims derivatively that each member of the Board of Directors engaged in mismanagement, waste and breach of their fiduciary duties in managing the Company's affairs. The 1993 Amended Complaint seeks, among other things, to enjoin the Acquisition and Redemption or in the alternative, rescission and damages in an unspecified amount. The Company believes that the allegations in the complaint, the Amended Complaint, the 1993 Complaint and the 1993 Amended Complaint are without merit, and intends to vigorously defend this action. CERTAIN CT AND CTF TRANSACTIONS CT currently leases equipment storage facilities from Jorge L. Mas Canosa and his spouse, Irma Mas. The term of the lease expires on October 31, 1998, and the annual rent under the lease is $48,000. The Company's Certificate requires the affirmative vote or consent of the holders of four-fifths of all classes of the Company's stock entitled to vote in elections of directors of the Company (the "Voting Shares") in connection with certain transactions with any person, corporation or other entity ("Affiliated Entity") beneficially owning 10% or more of 90
PRER14A99th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 99th
the outstanding Voting Shares. The Certificate provides, however, that the foregoing provision is not applicable to such transactions if the Board of Directors has approved by resolution a memorandum of understanding (a "Memorandum of Understanding") with such Affiliated Entity with respect to such transactions prior to the time such Affiliated Entity became an Affiliated Entity. In order to induce the stockholders of CT and CTF to enter into the Acquisition Agreement and by eliminating the effects of the foregoing provisions of the Certificate, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with each of Neff Machinery, Neff Rental and Atlantic prior to execution of the Acquisition Agreement. Each of Neff Machinery, Neff Rental and Atlantic is a Florida corporation controlled by the stockholders of CT and CTF and accordingly, following consummation of the Acquisition and by virtue of the ownership of the Burnup Shares by the CT Group, would be deemed affiliates of the Company. CT and CTF currently rent and purchase construction equipment from Neff Machinery and Neff Rental. The Company anticipates that, following the Acquisition, the Company and its subsidiaries, including CT and CTF, will from time to time purchase and lease equipment and parts, and obtain services from, these companies upon such terms and conditions as the Board of Directors shall approve, which terms and conditions will be no less favorable to the stockholders of the Company than those that would be obtained in transactions of a similar type with unaffiliated third parties. The stockholders of CT and CTF have no present intentions of selling Neff Machinery, Neff Rental or Atlantic to the Company following consummation of the Acquisition. See "PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH & TOWER, INC. AND CHURCH AND TOWER OF FLORIDA, INC. - Memorandum of Understanding." Carlos & Abbott, P.A. a law firm of which Eliot C. Abbott is a shareholder, has provided legal services to CT and CTF and their stockholders since 1983, and such representation will continue following the Acquisition. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 1993, such legal fees were approximately $52,000. It is anticipated that Carlos & Abbott, P.A. will also provide legal services to the Company if the Acquisition is consummated. 91
PRER14A100th Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 100th
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The following information sets forth selected consolidated historical data of the Company, the selected combined historical data of CT and CTF and the pro forma consolidated selected financial data giving effect to the Acquisition and the Redemption. This information should be read in conjunction with the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements and the separate historical consolidated financial statements of the Company incorporated by reference herein and combined financial statements of CT and CTF and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein. The financial information relating to the CT Group contained in this Proxy Statement was provided to the Company by the CT Group in connection with the Acquisition for the preparation of this Proxy Statement and the Company has relied upon such financial information in the preparation of this Proxy Statement. 92
PRER14A101st Page of 166TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 101st
ˇ Download Table The Company Selected Historical Financial Data (Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Amounts) Six Months Ended Oct. 31, Fiscal Years Ended April 30 1993 1992 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 Statement of Operations Data: Revenues $ 72,004 $ 73,834 $140,987 $ 153,521 $ 175,236 $ 192,712 $ 178,380 Costs and Expenses 74,023 73,439 151,917 157,114 174,155 192,007 174,695 Interest Expense 2,043 2,402 4,583 4,847 6,161 8,362 6,616 Interest and Other Income(1) (5,256) (2,781) (2,255) (6,833) (2,388) (10,411) (15,503) Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes and Equity in Net Income of NBC 1,194 774 (13,258) (1,607) (2,692) 2,754 12,572 Provisions (Credit) for 284 286 (3,950) (560) (1,082) 2,120 4,858 Income Taxes Income (Loss) Before Equity in Net Income of NBC 910 488 (9,308) (1,047) (1,610) 634 7,714 Equity in Net Income of NBC 0 0 0 0 828 151 1,525 Net Income (Loss) $910 $488 $ (9,308) $(1,047) $ (782) $ 785 $ 9,239 Average Shares Outstanding 8,815 8,768 8,768 8,768 9,460 9,662 10,304 (000) Earnings (Loss) Per Share $ 0.10 $ 0.06 $ (1.06) $ (.12) $ (.08) $ .08 $ .90 Balance Sheet Data (at end of period): Capital Expenditures $1,133 $ 4,338 $ 4,493 $ 4,395 $ 7,449 $ 9,533 93
PRER14A102nd Page of 166TOC