SEC Info℠ | Home | Search | My Interests | Help | Sign In | Please Sign In | ||||||||||||||||||||
As Of Filer Filing For·On·As Docs:Size Issuer Agent 5/13/05 Cardinal Financial Corp 424B1 1:2.0M Merrill Corp/New/FA |
Document/Exhibit Description Pages Size 1: 424B1 Prospectus HTML 1.92M
Filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1)
Registration Number 333-123511
PROSPECTUS
4,500,000 Shares
Common Stock
We are selling 4,500,000 shares of our common stock. Our common stock is currently traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "CFNL." On May 11, 2005, the last sale price of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market was $8.60 per share.
You should consider the risks that we have described in the "Risk Factors" section beginning on page 7 before buying shares of our common stock.
|
Per Share |
Total |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public offering price | $ | 8.250 | $ | 37,125,000 | ||
Underwriting discount | $ | 0.495 | $ | 2,227,500 | ||
Proceeds, before expenses, to Cardinal Financial Corporation | $ | 7.755 | $ | 34,897,500 |
This is a firm commitment underwriting. The underwriters may purchase up to an additional 675,000 shares from us at the public offering price, less the underwriting discount, within 30 days from the date of this prospectus, to cover over-allotments, if any.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed on the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
These securities are not savings accounts, deposits or obligations of any bank and are not insured by the Bank Insurance Fund or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency.
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares to purchasers on or about May 17, 2005.
RAYMOND JAMES | LEGG MASON WOOD WALKER Incorporated |
The date of this prospectus is May 11, 2005.
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. Because this is a summary, it may not contain all of the information that may be important to you. Therefore, you should read this entire prospectus carefully before making a decision to invest in our common stock, including the risks of purchasing common stock discussed under the "Risk Factors" section and our consolidated financial statements and related notes. Unless otherwise indicated, the information in this prospectus assumes that the underwriters will not exercise their over-allotment option.
In this prospectus, we frequently use the terms "we", "our" and "us" to refer to Cardinal Financial Corporation and our subsidiaries.
Cardinal Financial Corporation
Overview
We are a financial holding company formed in 1997 and headquartered in Tysons Corner, Virginia. We were formed principally in response to opportunities resulting from the consolidation of several Virginia-based banks. These bank consolidations were typically accompanied by the dissolution of local boards of directors and relocation or termination of management and customer service professionals and a general deterioration of personalized customer service.
We own Cardinal Bank, a Virginia state-chartered bank with 19 branches located in northern Virginia and the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. We offer a wide range of traditional banking products and services to both commercial and retail customers in our market areas. We focus on attracting small and medium-sized businesses as well as commercial real estate developers and builders in addition to professionals, such as physicians, accountants and attorneys.
On July 7, 2004, Cardinal Bank purchased George Mason Mortgage, LLC ("George Mason") for $17.0 million in cash. George Mason allows us to offer a broad array of mortgage loan products to our customers seeking to purchase a home or refinance a mortgage. George Mason also provides certain mortgage banking services to large local home builders. Headquartered in Fairfax, Virginia, George Mason currently has eight branches located throughout the metropolitan Washington, D.C. region and conducts business in eight states and the District of Columbia. George Mason is one of the largest residential mortgage originators in the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, originating and funding over $3.5 billion of residential mortgage loans in 2004.
We also own Cardinal Wealth Services, Inc., which further complements our core operations by offering a full range of investment products and services, including estate planning, qualified retirement plans, mutual funds, annuities, life insurance, fixed income and equity securities and equity research, to our customers through our third-party relationship with Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.
Growth Highlights
We have achieved significant growth in assets, loans and deposits over the past five years. Throughout our growth, we have emphasized the importance of a disciplined credit culture and have been successful in maintaining strong asset quality. Our financial highlights include the following:
1
Growth Strategy
We believe that both the strong demographic characteristics of our markets and the ongoing bank consolidation within the greater Washington, D.C. and Northern Virginia metropolitan areas provide a significant opportunity to continue building a successful community-focused banking franchise. We intend to continue to expand our business through internal growth as well as selective geographic expansion while maintaining strong asset quality and achieving sustained profitability. Our strategy for achieving these objectives includes the following:
Continue to expand our branch network. We intend to continue to expand our footprint by establishing new branches and potentially acquiring existing branches or other financial institutions in communities that present attractive growth opportunities within Northern Virginia and other markets in the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. During the 12 months ended March 31, 2005, we opened seven branch banking facilities, including our 19th branch which is located in Sterling, Virginia in January 2005. We have also submitted applications to banking regulators to open three additional branch banking offices, including one in the District of Columbia. We anticipate adding as many as five new branches by the end of 2005.
Further capitalize on the continued bank consolidation in our market. Recently announced or completed mergers of larger regional and national banks will result in further consolidation in our target market. We believe this consolidation creates opportunities for us to further expand our branch network to attractive retail sites, to increase our market share of bank deposits within our target market as well as to recruit dislocated customers seeking more personalized service from a local institution. As a local banking organization, we believe we can compete effectively by providing a high level of personalized customer service in a retail-oriented branch system.
Although we are not at this time engaged in negotiations with any specific bank acquisition targets, we will continue to explore the possibility of further growth through acquisition in Virginia and the metropolitan Washington, D.C. market.
Expand our lending activities. We have substantially increased our legal lending limit to $14.3 million as of March 31, 2005 as a result of retained earnings and the completion of our secondary common stock offering in December 2003. This has allowed us to further expand our commercial and real estate lending activities and improved our ability to serve larger residential homebuilders and government contractors in the greater Washington, D.C. area. Our goal is to aggressively grow our loan portfolio while maintaining superior asset quality through conservative underwriting practices.
Continue to recruit experienced bankers. We have been successful in recruiting senior bankers with experience in and knowledge of our markets who have been displaced or have grown dissatisfied
2
as a result of the bank consolidation in our market. We intend to continue our efforts to recruit experienced bankers, particularly experienced lenders within our market who can have an immediate impact on generating additional loan volume through existing relationships.
Focus on specialized lending services. We plan to continue to expand certain existing product lines that we believe provide unique opportunities for growth in our market, including government contract lending, SBA guaranteed lending, and retail lending.
Capitalize on cross-selling opportunities. We intend to further penetrate our expanding customer base through enhanced cross-selling initiatives and by offering additional financial products and services. The addition of George Mason allows us to offer our existing customer base a broader array of mortgage loan products. In addition, we will aggressively market our traditional banking and wealth management products to George Mason's customers. Our focus at George Mason is to build and maintain relationships with local and national homebuilders in an attempt to both reduce this business' reliance on the cyclical mortgage refinancing market and increase our commercial real estate lending activities. We also plan to further develop and expand the investment services we offer through our wealth management subsidiary. We believe we will better serve our growing customer base by expanding our current products and services and delivering them with personalized customer service.
Market Area
We consider our target market to be the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, which we define as the District of Columbia, the northern Virginia counties of Arlington, Fairfax, Fauquier, Loudoun, Prince William, Spotsylvania and Stafford, the Northern Virginia cities of Alexandria, Fairfax, Falls Church, Fredericksburg and Manassas, and the Maryland counties of Frederick, Montgomery and Prince George's.
According to 2000 U.S. census data, the population of the greater Washington metropolitan area was approximately 4.7 million people. The average of the median family income figures reported in the 2000 U.S. census for this market was approximately $64,000, compared to a national median household income of approximately $42,000. Based on estimates released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor for December 2004, the unemployment rate for the greater Washington metropolitan area was approximately 3.2%, compared to a national unemployment rate of 5.4%. According to 2000 U.S. census figures, approximately 44% of adults at least 25 years old in this area have a bachelor's degree or higher, compared to approximately 24% nationally. As of June 30, 2004, total deposits in this area were approximately $120 billion as reported by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Our headquarters is located approximately seven miles west of Washington, D.C. in Fairfax County, Virginia. The 2000 U.S. census data indicates that Fairfax County is the most populous county in Virginia with a population of approximately 1 million people and a median household income of over $81,000. Based on estimates released by the Bureau of Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor for December 2004, the unemployment rate in Fairfax County was 1.8%. The 2000 U.S. census data shows that over 54% of Fairfax county adults at least 25 years old have a bachelor's degree or higher.
* * * * *
Our principal executive offices are located at 8270 Greensboro Drive, Suite 500, McLean, Virginia 22102, and our telephone number is (703) 584-3400. Our Internet address is www.cardinalbank.com. The information contained on our web site is not part of this prospectus.
3
Recent Developments
On April 29, 2005, we signed a definitive agreement to acquire Wilson/Bennett Capital Management, Inc., an asset management firm based in Alexandria, Virginia. John W. Fisher, a member of our Board of Directors, is the founder and President and Chief Investment Officer of Wilson/Bennett and owns 90% of the firm. Under the terms of the agreement, we plan to acquire Wilson/Bennett for approximately $6.6 million in a combination of common stock and cash. The cash portion of the transaction will be approximately $1.1 million. We expect that, if the conditions to the closing of the transaction are satisfied, the transaction will close early in the third quarter of 2005. At that time, Wilson/Bennett will become a subsidiary of Cardinal Financial Corporation. Additional information on this transaction is included in "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" on page 79.
We believe that this acquisition advances our strategy of enhancing fee income and further diversifying our revenue stream. Wilson/Bennett has approximately 500 institutional and personal clients and approximately $227 million of assets under management. Wilson/Bennett utilizes a value-oriented investment approach that focuses on large capitalization stocks. Wilson/Bennett's 2004 revenues were approximately $1.4 million. We anticipate that the acquisition of Wilson/Bennett will not have a material impact on our 2005 earnings.
Common stock being offered | 4,500,000 shares | |
Common stock outstanding after the offering(1) |
23,030,894 shares |
|
Use of proceeds |
We will use the net proceeds from the offering to increase our capital to support our future growth and expansion and for general corporate purposes. |
|
Nasdaq market symbol |
CFNL |
4
SUMMARY HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
The table below presents a summary of our selected historical consolidated financial data for the periods and the dates indicated. Since the information contained in this table is a summary and does not provide all of the information contained in our consolidated financial statements, including the related notes, you should read "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected consolidated financial data has been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and from our audited consolidated financial statements for the years that ended December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000.
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
Years Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2004 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Income Statement Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 13,491 | $ | 7,415 | $ | 40,522 | $ | 24,602 | $ | 20,242 | $ | 16,577 | $ | 11,150 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | 5,669 | 2,582 | 15,969 | 9,429 | 9,586 | 7,500 | 4,740 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | 7,822 | 4,833 | 24,553 | 15,173 | 10,656 | 9,077 | 6,410 | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 549 | 74 | 1,626 | 1,001 | 444 | 1,202 | 753 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 7,273 | 4,759 | 22,927 | 14,172 | 10,212 | 7,875 | 5,657 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-interest income | 5,183 | 877 | 9,409 | 3,829 | 2,864 | 3,157 | 2,098 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expense | 10,095 | 4,555 | 27,154 | 15,355 | 13,605 | 23,756 | 11,726 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) before income taxes | 2,361 | 1,081 | 5,182 | 2,646 | (529 | ) | (12,724 | ) | (3,971 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 749 | 362 | 1,713 | (3,508 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 1,612 | 719 | 3,469 | 6,154 | (529 | ) | (12,724 | ) | (3,971 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Dividends to preferred shareholders | — | — | — | 495 | 495 | 503 | 171 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) to common shareholders(1) | $ | 1,612 | $ | 719 | $ | 3,469 | $ | 5,659 | $ | (1,024 | ) | $ | (13,227 | ) | $ | (4,142 | ) | |||||||
Balance Sheet Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,278,356 | $ | 693,451 | $ | 1,211,576 | $ | 636,248 | $ | 486,323 | $ | 279,584 | $ | 207,048 | ||||||||||
Loans receivable, net of deferred fees and costs | 535,704 | 334,476 | 489,896 | 336,002 | 249,106 | 200,911 | 154,271 | |||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | 6,432 | 4,347 | 5,878 | 4,344 | 3,372 | 3,104 | 1,900 | |||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market, net | 364,126 | 688 | 365,454 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Total investment securities | 296,812 | 322,121 | 289,507 | 273,614 | 163,665 | 34,147 | 6,935 | |||||||||||||||||
Total deposits | 894,871 | 525,931 | 824,210 | 474,129 | 423,479 | 246,024 | 163,371 | |||||||||||||||||
Other borrowed funds | 188,715 | 71,758 | 201,085 | 74,457 | 2,000 | 9,824 | 7,287 | |||||||||||||||||
Total shareholders' equity | 95,730 | 93,340 | 95,105 | 85,412 | 40,712 | 20,624 | 34,112 | |||||||||||||||||
Preferred shares outstanding | — | — | — | 1,364 | 1,365 | 1,365 | 1,411 | |||||||||||||||||
Common shares outstanding | 18,531 | 18,371 | 18,463 | 16,377 | 10,044 | 4,294 | 4,253 | |||||||||||||||||
Per Common Share Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic net income (loss) | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.55 | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (3.11 | ) | $ | (0.98 | ) | |||||||
Fully diluted net income (loss) | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.54 | (0.13 | ) | (3.11 | ) | (0.98 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Book value | 5.17 | 5.08 | 5.15 | 4.80 | 3.37 | 3.21 | 6.36 | |||||||||||||||||
Tangible book value | 4.38 | 5.08 | 4.36 | 4.80 | 3.31 | 3.06 | 4.11 | |||||||||||||||||
Performance Ratios: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on average assets | 0.57 | % | 0.43 | % | 0.37 | % | 1.18 | % | (0.14 | )% | (5.24 | )% | (2.72 | )% | ||||||||||
Return on average equity | 6.61 | 3.14 | 3.69 | 13.84 | (1.61 | ) | (39.14 | ) | (12.72 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net interest margin(2) | 2.84 | 3.00 | 2.72 | 3.00 | 2.92 | 4.17 | 4.82 | |||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio(3) | 77.62 | 79.77 | 79.95 | 80.81 | 100.63 | 194.18 | 137.82 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-interest income to average assets | 1.82 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 1.30 | 1.44 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expense to average assets | 3.55 | 2.74 | 2.90 | 2.94 | 3.50 | 9.79 | 8.03 | |||||||||||||||||
Loans receivable, net of fees to total deposits | 59.86 | 63.60 | 59.44 | 70.87 | 58.82 | 81.66 | 94.43 | |||||||||||||||||
5
Asset Quality Ratios: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs to average loans receivable, net of fees | — | 0.08 | % | 0.02 | % | 0.01 | % | 0.05 | % | — | — | |||||||||||||
Non-performing loans to loans receivable, net of fees | 0.11 | % | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.39 | 0.46 | % | 0.38 | % | ||||||||||||||
Non-performing loans to total assets | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.33 | 0.28 | |||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans | 1,064.90 | 1,834.20 | 1,074.60 | 1,102.54 | 345.49 | 334.84 | 323.68 | |||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to loan receivable, net of fees | 1.20 | 1.30 | 1.20 | 1.29 | 1.35 | 1.54 | 1.23 | |||||||||||||||||
Capital Ratios: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 risk-based capital | 12.06 | % | 19.91 | % | 12.65 | % | 19.66 | % | 12.25 | % | 9.04 | % | 18.89 | % | ||||||||||
Total risk-based capital | 12.83 | 20.84 | 13.40 | 20.66 | 13.35 | 10.42 | 19.94 | |||||||||||||||||
Leverage capital ratio | 9.23 | 14.65 | 8.83 | 15.45 | 8.97 | 8.57 | 17.39 | |||||||||||||||||
Other: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average shareholders' equity to average total assets | 8.58 | % | 13.80 | % | 10.05 | % | 7.84 | % | 8.45 | % | 13.39 | % | 21.37 | % | ||||||||||
Average loans receivable, net of fees to average total deposits | 59.67 | 67.74 | 59.97 | 63.02 | 59.36 | 91.69 | 98.15 | |||||||||||||||||
Average common shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | 18,525 | 17,461 | 18,448 | 10,218 | 7,949 | 4,258 | 4,246 | |||||||||||||||||
Diluted | 18,830 | 17,885 | 18,705 | 11,468 | 7,949 | 4,258 | 4,246 |
6
An investment in our common stock involves significant risks. You should carefully read and consider these risks and uncertainties before you decide to invest in our common stock. These risk factors may adversely affect our financial condition and future earnings. In that event, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you could lose all or a part of your investment. You should read this section together with the other information, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes to the consolidated financial statements, included in this prospectus.
Risks Factors
We have operated at a cumulative loss since our inception.
We have operated at a cumulative loss since our organization in 1997. While we reported net income of $3.5 million in 2004 and $5.7 million in 2003, we cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to operate at a profit as we continue to grow.
We may not be able to successfully manage our growth or implement our growth strategies, which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
During the last five years, we have experienced significant growth, and a key aspect of our business strategy is our continued growth and expansion. Our ability to continue to grow depends, in part, upon our ability to:
We may not be able to successfully implement our growth strategy if we are unable to identify attractive markets, locations or opportunities to expand in the future. Our ability to manage our growth successfully also will depend on whether we can maintain capital levels adequate to support our growth, maintain cost controls and asset quality and successfully integrate any businesses we acquire into our organization.
As we continue to implement our growth strategy by opening new branches or acquiring branches or other banks, we expect to incur increased personnel, occupancy and other operating expenses. In the case of new branches, we must absorb those higher expenses while we begin to generate new deposits, and there is a further time lag involved in redeploying new deposits into attractively priced loans and other higher yielding earning assets. Thus, our plans to branch aggressively could depress our earnings in the short run, even if we efficiently execute our branching strategy.
We rely heavily on our management team and the unexpected loss of any of those personnel could adversely affect our operations; we depend on our ability to attract and retain key personnel.
We are a customer-focused and relationship-driven organization. We expect our future growth to be driven in a large part by the relationships maintained with our customers by our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Bernard H. Clineburg, and our other executive and senior lending officers. We have entered into employment agreements with Mr. Clineburg and three other executive officers. The existence of such agreements, however, does not necessarily assure that we will be able to continue to retain their services. The unexpected loss of Mr. Clineburg or other key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business and possibly result in reduced revenues and earnings. We do not maintain key man life insurance policies on any of our executives.
7
The implementation of our business strategy will also require us to continue to attract, hire, motivate and retain skilled personnel to develop new customer relationships as well as new financial products and services. Many experienced banking professionals employed by our competitors are covered by agreements not to compete or solicit their existing customers if they were to leave their current employment. These agreements make the recruitment of these professionals more difficult. The market for these people is competitive, and we cannot assure you that we will be successful in attracting, hiring, motivating or retaining them.
We have identified a material weakness and significant deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that may adversely affect our ability to properly account for non-routine transactions.
As we have grown and expanded, we have acquired and added, and expect to continue to acquire and add, businesses and other activities that complement our core retail and commercial banking functions. Such acquisitions or additions frequently involve complex operational and financial reporting issues. While we make every effort to thoroughly understand any new activity or acquired entity's business and plan for proper integration into our company, we can give no assurance that we will not encounter operational and financial reporting difficulties.
For example, in February 2005, we restated our three- and nine-month financial statements for the periods ended September 30, 2004. The restatement resulted from our identification of certain errors relating to our acquisition of George Mason in 2004. Specifically, management and our independent registered accounting firm concluded that our accounting personnel lacked sufficient resources and expertise to properly account for certain non-routine transactions, our policies and procedures did not provide for timely review of significant non-routine transactions and related accounting entries, and we did not maintain sufficient documentation related to the application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles to significant non-routine transactions. Our management and our independent registered accounting firm concluded that such circumstances constituted a material weakness and that, as a result, our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 was not effective. Additional information on these issues is included in the "Controls and Procedures" section of Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations found later in this prospectus.
In response to the circumstances giving rise to such material weakness, we appointed a new chief financial officer and hired a new senior accountant in October 2004. Furthermore, during the first quarter of 2005, we implemented timely review and sign-off procedures that include the utilization of a disclosure checklist. Finally, we implemented procedures to ensure that we document the application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles to significant non-routine transactions. Although we believe that these efforts have strengthened our internal controls and addressed the concerns that gave rise to the material weakness, we are continuing to work to improve our internal control over financial reporting related to non-routine transactions. We cannot be certain, however, that these measures will ensure that we implement and maintain adequate controls over our financial processes and reporting in the future for such transactions. In addition, as permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have not yet completed an assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting at George Mason. Any failure to implement effective internal control over financial reporting, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, with respect to non-routine transactions or otherwise could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. Inadequate internal control over financial reporting could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our stock.
We may incur losses if we are unable to successfully manage interest rate risk.
Our profitability will depend in substantial part upon the spread between the interest rates earned on investments and loans and interest rates paid on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities. We
8
may pay above-market rates to attract deposits as we have done in some of our marketing promotions in the past. Changes in interest rates will affect our operating performance and financial condition in diverse ways including the pricing of securities, loans and deposits, the volume of loan originations in our mortgage banking business and the value we can recognize on the sale of mortgage and home equity loans in the secondary market. We attempt to minimize our exposure to interest rate risk, but we will be unable to eliminate it. Based on our asset/liability position at March 31, 2005, a rise in interest rates would benefit our net interest income in the short term. Our net interest spread will depend on many factors that are partly or entirely outside our control, including competition, federal economic, monetary and fiscal policies, and economic conditions generally.
We may be adversely affected by economic conditions in our market area.
We are headquartered in northern Virginia, and our market includes the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Because our lending is concentrated in this market, we will be affected by the general economic conditions in the greater Washington area. Changes in the economy may influence the growth rate of our loans and deposits, the quality of the loan portfolio and loan and deposit pricing and the performance of our mortgage subsidiary. A significant decline in general economic conditions caused by inflation, recession, unemployment or other factors beyond our control would impact these local economic conditions and the demand for banking products and services generally, which could negatively affect our financial condition and performance.
In recent years, there has been a proliferation of technology and communications businesses in our market area. The recent economic recession and the downturn in those industries have had a significant adverse impact on a number of those businesses. Although we do not have significant credit exposure to these businesses, the downturn in these industries could have a negative impact on local economic conditions and real estate collateral values generally, which could negatively affect our profitability.
Our concentration in loans secured by real estate may increase our credit losses, which would negatively affect our financial results.
We offer a variety of secured loans, including commercial lines of credit, commercial term loans, real estate, construction, home equity, consumer and other loans. Many of our loans are secured by real estate (both residential and commercial) in our market area. At March 31, 2005, substantially all of our $364.1 million portfolio of loans held for sale was secured by residential real estate. As of this same date, approximately 58% and 30% of our $535.7 million loans receivable portfolio were secured by commercial and residential real estate, respectively. A major change in the real estate market, such as a deterioration in the value of this collateral, or in the local or national economy, could adversely affect our customers' ability to pay these loans, which in turn could impact us. Risk of loan defaults and foreclosures are unavoidable in the banking industry, and we try to limit our exposure to this risk by monitoring our extensions of credit carefully. We cannot fully eliminate credit risk, and as a result credit losses may occur in the future.
If our allowance for loan losses becomes inadequate, our results of operations may be adversely affected.
We maintain an allowance for loan losses that we believe is a reasonable estimate of known and inherent losses in our loan portfolio. Through a periodic review and consideration of the loan portfolio, management determines the amount of the allowance for loan losses by considering general market conditions, credit quality of the loan portfolio, the collateral supporting the loans and performance of our customers relative to their financial obligations with us. The amount of future losses is susceptible to changes in economic, operating and other conditions, including changes in interest rates, that may be beyond our control, and these losses may exceed our current estimates. Rapidly growing loan portfolios are, by their nature, unseasoned. As a result, estimating loan loss allowances is more difficult, and may
9
be more susceptible to changes in estimates, and to losses exceeding estimates, than more seasoned portfolios. Although we believe the allowance for loan losses is a reasonable estimate of known and inherent losses in our loan portfolio, we cannot fully predict such losses or that our loan loss allowance will be adequate in the future. Excessive loan losses could have a material impact on our financial performance. Because of our growth strategy, we expect that our earnings will be negatively impacted by loan growth, which requires additions to our allowance for loan losses. Consistent with our loan loss reserve methodology, we expect to make additions to our loan loss reserve levels as a result of our growth strategy, which may affect our short-term earnings.
Federal and state regulators periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require us to increase our provision for loan losses or recognize further loan charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of our management. Any increase in the amount of our provision or loans charged-off as required by these regulatory agencies could have a negative effect on our operating results.
Our future success is dependent on our ability to compete effectively in the highly competitive banking industry.
We face vigorous competition from other banks and other financial institutions, including savings and loan associations, savings banks, finance companies and credit unions for deposits, loans and other financial services in our market area. A number of these banks and other financial institutions are significantly larger than we are and have substantially greater access to capital and other resources, as well as larger lending limits and branch systems, and offer a wider array of banking services. To a limited extent, we also compete with other providers of financial services, such as money market mutual funds, brokerage firms, consumer finance companies, insurance companies and governmental organizations which may offer more favorable financing than we can. Many of our non-bank competitors are not subject to the same extensive regulations that govern us. As a result, these non-bank competitors have advantages over us in providing certain services. This competition may reduce or limit our margins and our market share and may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Our profitability and the value of your investment may suffer because of rapid and unpredictable changes in the highly regulated environment in which we operate.
We are subject to extensive supervision by several governmental regulatory agencies at the federal and state levels. Recently enacted, proposed and future banking legislation and regulations have had, and will continue to have, or may have a significant impact on the financial services industry. These regulations, which are intended to protect depositors and not our shareholders, and the interpretation and application of them by federal and state regulators, are beyond our control, may change rapidly and unpredictably and can be expected to influence our earnings and growth. Our success depends on our continued ability to maintain compliance with these regulations. Some of these regulations may increase our costs and thus place other financial institutions that are not subject to similar regulation in stronger, more favorable competitive positions.
If we need additional capital in the future to continue our growth, we may not be able to obtain it on terms that are favorable. This could negatively affect our performance and the value of our common stock.
Our business strategy calls for continued growth. We anticipate that we will be able to support this growth through the generation of additional deposits at new branch locations as well as investment opportunities. However, we may need to raise additional capital in the future to support our continued growth and to maintain our capital levels. Our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional securities will depend primarily upon our financial condition and the condition of financial markets at
10
that time. We may not be able to obtain additional capital in the amounts or on terms satisfactory to us. Our growth may be constrained if we are unable to raise additional capital as needed.
Risks Related to the Securities Markets and Ownership of Our Common Stock
There is a limited trading market for our common stock; it may be difficult to sell our shares after you have purchased them.
Our common stock is currently listed on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "CFNL." The volume of trading activity in our stock is relatively limited. Even if a more active market develops, there can be no assurance that such market will continue, or that you will be able to sell your shares at or above the offering price. You should carefully consider the lack of liquidity of your investment in the common shares when making your investment decision.
Because we have no plans to pay cash dividends on our common stock, you may recognize a return on your investment only through selling your common shares.
We do not currently pay cash dividends on our common stock and have no plans to do so in the foreseeable future. Moreover, our ability to pay future dividends largely depends on our receipt of dividends from the bank and federal banking laws restrict the amount of dividends the bank can pay to us. You should not purchase our common stock if you are depending upon dividend income from this investment.
We may in the future issue additional stock, any or all of which will dilute your percentage ownership and, possibly, the value of your shares.
Our board of directors has the authority to issue all or part of any authorized but unissued common shares without prior shareholder approval and without allowing the shareholders the right to purchase their pro rata portion of such shares. This includes shares authorized to be issued under our stock option plans. The issuance of any new common shares will dilute your percentage ownership, and could dilute the value of your shares. Assuming 4,500,000 shares are sold in this offering, we will have 23,030,894 outstanding common shares. If the underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full, the number of common shares issued in this offering would increase from 4,500,000 to 5,175,000. At March 31, 2005, 1,661,055 common shares were issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options granted under our stock option plans, of which options to purchase 1,130,674 shares were currently exercisable.
11
CAUTION ABOUT FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
We make certain forward looking statements in this prospectus that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These forward looking statements include statements regarding our profitability, liquidity, allowance for loan losses, interest rate sensitivity, market risk, growth strategy, and financial and other goals. The words "believes," "expects," "may," "will," "should," "projects," "contemplates," "anticipates," "forecasts," "intends," or other similar words or terms are intended to identify forward looking statements.
These forward looking statements are subject to significant uncertainties because they are based upon or are affected by factors including:
Because of these uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements. In addition, our past results of operations do not necessarily indicate our future results.
12
We will receive net proceeds of approximately $34.64 million from the sale of 4,500,000 shares of our common stock in this offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses of approximately $261,000 payable by us. If the underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full, our net proceeds will be approximately $39.87 million.
We will use the net proceeds from this offering to increase our capital to support our future growth and expansion and for general corporate purposes. We have not otherwise made a specific allocation for the use of the net proceeds.
Effect of the Offering on Book Value
At March 31, 2005, we had a net tangible book value of approximately $81.1 million, or $4.38 per share of common stock. Net tangible book value per common share represents the amount of our common shareholders' equity, less intangible assets, divided by the number of shares of common stock that are outstanding. Dilution per share to new investors in this offering represents the difference between the amount per share that these investors paid and the pro forma net tangible book value per share of common stock immediately after completion of this offering.
After giving effect to the sale by us of all 4,500,000 shares of common stock in this offering at the public offering price of $8.25 per share, deducting estimated offering expenses, and giving effect to the application of the estimated net proceeds described in the "Use of Proceeds" above, our pro forma net tangible book value at March 31, 2005 would have been approximately $115.7 million, or $5.02 per share. This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $0.65 per share to existing shareholders and an immediate dilution of $3.23 per share to new investors.
Comparison of Prices Paid for Common Stock
The following table sets forth on a pro forma basis, as of March 31, 2005:
|
Shares Purchased |
Total Consideration |
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Average Price Per Share |
||||||||||||
|
Number |
Percent |
Amount |
Percent |
|||||||||
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||||
Existing shareholders (1) | 18,531 | 80.5 | % | $ | 115,791 | 75.7 | % | $ | 6.25 | ||||
New investors (2) | 4,500 | 19.5 | 37,125 | 24.3 | $ | 8.25 | |||||||
Total | 23,031 | 100.0 | % | $ | 152,916 | 100.0 | % | ||||||
13
MARKET FOR COMMON STOCK AND DIVIDENDS
Market for Common Stock
Our common stock is currently listed for quotation on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "CFNL." Prior to December 17, 2003, our common stock was listed for quotation on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market under the same symbol. As of May 11, 2005, our common stock was held by 699 shareholders of record. In addition, we estimate that there were 4,800 beneficial owners of our common stock who own their shares through brokers or banks.
The high and low sale prices per share for our common stock for each quarter of 2003 and 2004 and the first and second quarters of 2005 through May 11, 2005, as reported on the Nasdaq National Market and, prior to December 17, 2003, on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, were as follows:
Periods Ended |
High |
Low |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 | |||||||
Second Quarter (through May 11, 2005) | $ | 9.50 | $ | 7.75 | |||
First Quarter | 11.45 | 9.01 | |||||
2004 |
|||||||
Fourth Quarter | $ | 11.42 | $ | 9.21 | |||
Third Quarter | 9.64 | 8.40 | |||||
Second Quarter | 9.92 | 8.49 | |||||
First Quarter | 9.80 | 8.15 | |||||
2003 |
|||||||
Fourth Quarter | $ | 8.68 | $ | 6.40 | |||
Third Quarter | 7.08 | 6.10 | |||||
Second Quarter | 7.01 | 5.13 | |||||
First Quarter | 5.45 | 4.30 |
The closing sale price for our common stock on May 11, 2005 as reported on the Nasdaq National Market was $8.60 per share.
14
We have not declared or distributed any cash dividends to the holders of our common stock, and we have no current intentions to declare a cash dividend in the foreseeable future. Our board of directors intends to follow a policy of retaining any earnings to provide funds to operate and expand our business. Our future dividend policy is subject to the discretion of the board of directors and will depend upon a number of factors, including future earnings, financial condition, cash requirements, and general business conditions.
Our ability to distribute cash dividends will depend primarily on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to us. Cardinal Bank is subject to legal limitations on the amount of dividends it is permitted to pay. Furthermore, neither Cardinal Bank nor we may declare or pay a cash dividend on any of our capital stock if we are insolvent or if the payment of the dividend would render us insolvent or unable to pay our obligations as they become due in the ordinary course of business. For additional information on these limitations, see "Government Regulation and Supervision—Payment of Dividends."
15
The table below sets forth our historical consolidated capitalization at March 31, 2005, and our capitalization as of the same date on an adjusted basis, giving effect to this offering. For purposes of this table, our net proceeds from this offering are estimated to be approximately $34.64 million after deducting estimated offering expenses and underwriting discounts and commissions. If the underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full, 675,000 additional shares would be sold, resulting in aggregate net proceeds of approximately $39.87 million based on the public offering price after deducting estimated offering expenses and underwriting discounts and commissions.
The following data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial information and related notes.
|
March 31, 2005 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
As Adjusted |
||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|||||||
Common stock, $1 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 18,530,894 shares issued and outstanding; 23,030,894 shares issued and outstanding as adjusted (1) |
$ | 18,531 | $ | 23,031 | ||||
Additional paid-in capital | 93,260 | 123,397 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (13,533 | ) | (13,533 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) | (2,528 | ) | (2,528 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders' equity | $ | 95,730 | $ | 130,367 | ||||
Total capitalization | $ | 95,730 | $ | 130,367 | ||||
The following table sets forth our actual consolidated regulatory capital amounts and ratios as of March 31, 2005, and as adjusted as of March 31, 2005, after giving effect to the application of the net proceeds of this offering.
|
March 31, 2005 |
||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
As Adjusted |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Capital |
"Well- capitalized" Standard |
Excess/ (Deficit) Capital |
Capital |
"Well- capitalized" Standard |
Excess/ (Deficit) Capital |
|||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||
Dollar Basis | |||||||||||||||||||
Total risk based capital | $ | 110,157 | $ | 85,888 | $ | 24,269 | $ | 144,794 | $ | 85,888 | $ | 58,906 | |||||||
Tier 1 risk based capital | 103,613 | 51,533 | 52,080 | 138,250 | 51,533 | 86,717 | |||||||||||||
Leverage capital | 103,613 | 56,113 | 47,500 | 138,250 | 56,113 | 82,137 | |||||||||||||
Percentage Basis |
|||||||||||||||||||
Total risk based capital | 12.83 | % | 10.00 | % | 2.83 | % | 16.86 | % | 10.00 | % | 6.86 | % | |||||||
Tier 1 risk based capital | 12.06 | 6.00 | 6.06 | 16.10 | 6.00 | 10.10 | |||||||||||||
Leverage capital | 9.23 | 5.00 | 4.23 | 12.32 | 5.00 | 7.32 |
16
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
The table below presents a summary of our selected historical consolidated financial data for the periods and the dates indicated. Since the information contained in this table is a summary and does not provide all of the information contained in our consolidated financial statements, including the related notes, you should read "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected consolidated financial data has been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and from our audited consolidated financial statements for the years that ended December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000.
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
Years Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2004 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Income Statement Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 13,491 | $ | 7,415 | $ | 40,522 | $ | 24,602 | $ | 20,242 | $ | 16,577 | $ | 11,150 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | 5,669 | 2,582 | 15,969 | 9,429 | 9,586 | 7,500 | 4,740 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | 7,822 | 4,833 | 24,553 | 15,173 | 10,656 | 9,077 | 6,410 | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 549 | 74 | 1,626 | 1,001 | 444 | 1,202 | 753 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 7,273 | 4,759 | 22,927 | 14,172 | 10,212 | 7,875 | 5,657 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-interest income | 5,183 | 877 | 9,409 | 3,829 | 2,864 | 3,157 | 2,098 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expense | 10,095 | 4,555 | 27,154 | 15,355 | 13,605 | 23,756 | 11,726 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) before income taxes | 2,361 | 1,081 | 5,182 | 2,646 | (529 | ) | (12,724 | ) | (3,971 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 749 | 362 | 1,713 | (3,508 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 1,612 | 719 | 3,469 | 6,154 | (529 | ) | (12,724 | ) | (3,971 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Dividends to preferred shareholders | — | — | — | 495 | 495 | 503 | 171 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) to common shareholders(1) | $ | 1,612 | $ | 719 | $ | 3,469 | $ | 5,659 | $ | (1,024 | ) | $ | (13,227 | ) | $ | (4,142 | ) | |||||||
Balance Sheet Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,278,356 | $ | 693,451 | $ | 1,211,576 | $ | 636,248 | $ | 486,323 | $ | 279,584 | $ | 207,048 | ||||||||||
Loans receivable, net of deferred fees and costs | 535,704 | 334,476 | 489,896 | 336,002 | 249,106 | 200,911 | 154,271 | |||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | 6,432 | 4,347 | 5,878 | 4,344 | 3,372 | 3,104 | 1,900 | |||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market, net | 364,126 | 688 | 365,454 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Total investment securities | 296,812 | 322,121 | 289,507 | 273,614 | 163,665 | 34,147 | 6,935 | |||||||||||||||||
Total deposits | 894,871 | 525,931 | 824,210 | 474,129 | 423,479 | 246,024 | 163,371 | |||||||||||||||||
Other borrowed funds | 188,715 | 71,758 | 201,085 | 74,457 | 2,000 | 9,824 | 7,287 | |||||||||||||||||
Total shareholders' equity | 95,730 | 93,340 | 95,105 | 85,412 | 40,712 | 20,624 | 34,112 | |||||||||||||||||
Preferred shares outstanding | — | — | — | 1,364 | 1,365 | 1,365 | 1,411 | |||||||||||||||||
Common shares outstanding | 18,531 | 18,371 | 18,463 | 16,377 | 10,044 | 4,294 | 4,253 | |||||||||||||||||
Per Common Share Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic net income (loss) | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.55 | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (3.11 | ) | $ | (0.98 | ) | |||||||
Fully diluted net income (loss) | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.54 | (0.13 | ) | (3.11 | ) | (0.98 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Book value | 5.17 | 5.08 | 5.15 | 4.80 | 3.37 | 3.21 | 6.36 | |||||||||||||||||
Tangible book value | 4.38 | 5.08 | 4.36 | 4.80 | 3.31 | 3.06 | 4.11 | |||||||||||||||||
Performance Ratios: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on average assets | 0.57 | % | 0.43 | % | 0.37 | % | 1.18 | % | (0.14 | )% | (5.24 | )% | (2.72 | )% | ||||||||||
Return on average equity | 6.61 | 3.14 | 3.69 | 13.84 | (1.61 | ) | (39.14 | ) | (12.72 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net interest margin(2) | 2.84 | 3.00 | 2.72 | 3.00 | 2.92 | 4.17 | 4.82 | |||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio(3) | 77.62 | 79.77 | 79.95 | 80.81 | 100.63 | 194.18 | 137.82 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-interest income to average assets | 1.82 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 1.30 | 1.44 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expense to average assets | 3.55 | 2.74 | 2.90 | 2.94 | 3.50 | 9.79 | 8.03 | |||||||||||||||||
Loans receivable, net of fees to total deposits | 59.86 | 63.60 | 59.44 | 70.87 | 58.82 | 81.66 | 94.43 | |||||||||||||||||
17
Asset Quality Ratios: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs to average loans receivable, net of fees | — | 0.08 | % | 0.02 | % | 0.01 | % | 0.05 | % | — | — | |||||||||||||
Non-performing loans to loans receivable, net of fees | 0.11 | % | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.39 | 0.46 | % | 0.38 | % | ||||||||||||||
Non-performing loans to total assets | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.33 | 0.28 | |||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans | 1,064.90 | 1,834.20 | 1,074.60 | 1,102.54 | 345.49 | 334.84 | 323.68 | |||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to loan receivable, net of fees | 1.20 | 1.30 | 1.20 | 1.29 | 1.35 | 1.54 | 1.23 | |||||||||||||||||
Capital Ratios: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 risk-based capital | 12.06 | % | 19.91 | % | 12.65 | % | 19.66 | % | 12.25 | % | 9.04 | % | 18.89 | % | ||||||||||
Total risk-based capital | 12.83 | 20.84 | 13.40 | 20.66 | 13.35 | 10.42 | 19.94 | |||||||||||||||||
Leverage capital ratio | 9.23 | 14.65 | 8.83 | 15.45 | 8.97 | 8.57 | 17.39 | |||||||||||||||||
Other: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average shareholders' equity to average total assets | 8.58 | % | 13.80 | % | 10.05 | % | 7.84 | % | 8.45 | % | 13.39 | % | 21.37 | % | ||||||||||
Average loans receivable, net of fees to average total deposits | 59.67 | 67.74 | 59.97 | 63.02 | 59.36 | 91.69 | 98.15 | |||||||||||||||||
Average common shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | 18,525 | 17,461 | 18,448 | 10,218 | 7,949 | 4,258 | 4,246 | |||||||||||||||||
Diluted | 18,830 | 17,885 | 18,705 | 11,468 | 7,949 | 4,258 | 4,246 |
18
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following presents management's discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the results of our operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. The discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Overview
We are a financial holding company formed in 1997 and headquartered in Tysons Corner, Virginia. We own Cardinal Bank, a Virginia state-chartered bank with 19 branches located in northern Virginia and the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. We offer a wide range of traditional banking products and services to both commercial and retail customers in our market areas, focusing on attracting small and medium-sized businesses as well as commercial real estate developers and builders in addition to professionals, such as physicians, accountants and attorneys.
Through Cardinal Wealth Services, Inc., we complement our core banking operations by offering a full range of investment products and services, including estate planning, qualified retirement plans, mutual funds, annuities, life insurance, fixed income and equity securities and equity research, to our customers through our third-party relationship with Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.
On July 7, 2004, we acquired George Mason from United Bank—Virginia, a wholly owned subsidiary of United Bankshares, Inc., in a cash transaction for $17.0 million. This transaction resulted in the recognition of $12.9 million of goodwill. This transaction was accounted for as a purchase, and George Mason's assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value as of the purchase date. George Mason's operating results are included in our consolidated results since the date of the acquisition. George Mason, based in Fairfax, Virginia, engages primarily in the origination and acquisition of residential mortgages for sale into the secondary market on a best efforts basis through eight branches located throughout the metropolitan Washington, D.C. region. George Mason has approximately 200 employees and does business in eight states, including Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia. George Mason is one of the largest residential mortgage originators in the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, reporting originations and fundings of over $3.5 billion in 2004 and $4.5 billion in 2003. George Mason's primary sources of revenue include net interest income earned on loans held for sale, gain on the sale of loans held for sale and contractual management fees earned relating to the services provided to other mortgage companies owned by local home builders. Loans are made pursuant to purchase commitments and are sold servicing released.
In July 2004, the Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, Cardinal Statutory Trust I, for the purpose of issuing $20.0 million of floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures ("trust preferred securities"). These trust preferred securities are due in 2034 and pay interest at a rate equal to LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) plus 2.40%, which adjusts quarterly. These securities are redeemable at a premium through March 2008 and at par thereafter. The Company has guaranteed payment of these securities. The $20.6 million payable by the Company to Cardinal Statutory Trust I is included in other borrowed funds in the Consolidated Statements of Condition since Cardinal Statutory Trust I is an unconsolidated subsidiary as the Company is not the primary beneficiary of this entity. The Company utilized the proceeds from the issuance of the trust preferred securities to make a capital contribution into the Bank.
On April 29, 2005, we signed a definitive agreement to acquire Wilson/Bennett Capital Management, Inc., an asset management firm based in Alexandria, Virginia. John W. Fisher, a member of our Board of Directors, is the founder and President and Chief Investment Officer of Wilson/Bennett and owns 90% of the firm. Under the terms the agreement, we plan to acquire
19
Wilson/Bennett for approximately $6.6 million in a combination of common stock and cash. The cash portion of the transaction will be approximately $1.1 million. We expect that, if the conditions to the closing of the transaction are satisfied, the transaction will close early in the third quarter of 2005. At that time, Wilson/Bennett will become a subsidiary of Cardinal Financial Corporation.
We believe that the acquisition furthers our strategy of enhancing fee income and further diversifying our revenue stream. Wilson/Bennett has approximately 500 institutional and personal clients and approximately $227 million of assets under management. Wilson/Bennett utilizes a value-oriented investment approach that focuses on large capitalization stocks. Wilson/Bennett's 2004 revenues were approximately $1.4 million. We anticipate that the acquisition of Wilson/Bennett will not have a material impact on our 2005 earnings.
Net interest income is our primary source of revenue. We define revenue as net interest income plus non-interest income. As discussed further in the interest rate sensitivity section, we manage our balance sheet and interest rate risk to maximize, and concurrently stabilize, net interest income. We do this by monitoring the spread between the interest rates earned on interest earning assets and the interest rate paid on interest bearing liabilities. We attempt to minimize our exposure to interest rate risk, but are unable to eliminate it. In addition to management of interest rate risk, we analyze our loan portfolio for exposure to credit risk. Risk of loan defaults and foreclosures are unavoidable in the banking industry, and we try to limit our exposure to this risk by carefully underwriting and monitoring our extensions of credit. In addition to net interest income, non-interest income is an increasingly important source of income for us and includes service charges on deposits and loans, investment fee income, gains on sales on investment securities available-for-sale, gains on sales of loans held for sale and management fee income. Our acquisition of George Mason in July 2004 has resulted in non-interest income becoming a larger component of our total revenues.
Net interest income and non-interest income represented the following percentages of total revenue for the three years ended December 31, 2004:
|
Net Interest Income |
Non-Interest Income |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 72.3% | 27.7% | ||
2003 | 79.8% | 20.2% | ||
2002 | 78.8% | 21.2% |
We anticipate that non-interest income will be a larger percentage of our total revenue in 2005 than it was in 2004 since we will have owned George Mason for a full year in 2005 compared to a half year in 2004.
Our business strategy is to grow through geographic expansion while maintaining strong asset quality and achieving sustained profitability. We completed a secondary common stock offering that raised $41.7 million in capital in December 2003 and an additional $6.3 million in capital following the exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option in January 2004. This capital is being used to support the continuing expansion of our branch office network and balance sheet growth. As a result of this increased capital and retained earnings, we increased our legal lending limit to $14.3 million as of March 31, 2005, which has allowed us to expand our commercial and real estate lending loan portfolios. We expect to increase our loan-to-deposit ratio and shift the mix of our earning assets to higher yielding loans. We used $17.0 million of the cash that was raised in December 2003 and January 2004 to acquire George Mason. The acquisition of George Mason furthers our goal of broadening the financial products and services we offer and allows us to diversify our revenue base, increase fee income, and strengthen customer relationships.
20
Critical Accounting Policies
General
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles are complex and require management to apply significant judgment to various accounting, reporting, and disclosure matters. Management must use assumptions and estimates to apply these principles where actual measurements are not possible or practical. These policies are critical because they are highly dependent upon subjective or complex judgments, assumptions and estimates. Changes in such judgments, assumptions or estimates may have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The accounting policies we view as critical are those relating to judgments, assumptions and estimates regarding the accounting for business combinations, the determination of the allowance for loan losses, accounting for economic hedging activities, and the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.
Accounting for Business Combinations
We account for acquisitions of other businesses in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Statement No. 141, Business Combinations. This statement mandates the use of purchase accounting and, accordingly, assets and liabilities, including previously unrecorded assets and liabilities, are recorded at fair values as of the acquisition date. We utilize a variety of valuation methods to estimate fair value of acquired assets and liabilities. These methodologies are often based upon assumptions and estimates which may change at a future date and require that the carrying amount of assets and liabilities acquired be adjusted. To reduce the possibility of future adjustments, we have utilized independent consultants to identify and value identifiable purchased intangibles. The difference between the fair value of assets acquired less the fair value of liabilities acquired is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill and any other intangible assets are accounted for in accordance with FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. In accordance with this statement, goodwill will not be amortized but will be tested on at least an annual basis for impairment.
Allowance for Loan Losses
We maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level that represents management's best estimate of known and inherent losses in the loan portfolio. Both the amount of the provision expense and the level of the allowance for loan losses are impacted by many factors, including general economic conditions, actual and expected credit losses, historical trends and specific conditions of the individual borrowers. As a part of our analysis, we use comparative peer group data, duration factors and qualitative factors such as levels of and trends in delinquencies and non-accrual loans, national and local economic trends and conditions and concentrations of loans exhibiting similar risk profiles to support our estimates.
Credit losses are an inherent part of our business and, although we believe the methodologies for determining the allowance for loan losses and the current level of the allowance are adequate, it is possible that there may be unidentified losses in the portfolio that may become evident at a future date pursuant to additional analysis or regulatory comment. Additional provisions for such losses, if necessary, would be recorded in the commercial banking or mortgage banking segment, as appropriate, and would negatively impact earnings.
For purposes of our analysis, we categorize our loans into one of five categories: commercial and industrial, commercial real estate (including construction), home equity lines of credit, residential mortgages, and consumer loans. Peer group annual loss factors (in the absence of historical results) are applied to all categories and are adjusted by the projected duration of the loan category and by the
21
qualitative factors mentioned above. The indicated loss factors resulting from this analysis are applied to each of the loan categories to determine a reserve level for each of the five categories of loans. In addition, we individually assign loss factors to all loans that have been identified as having loss attributes, as indicated by deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower or a decline in underlying collateral values. Since we have limited historical data on which to base loss factors for classified loans, we apply, in accordance with regulatory guidelines, a 5% loss factor to all special mention loans, a 15% loss factor to all substandard loans and a 50% loss factor to all loans classified as doubtful. Loans classified as loss loans are fully reserved or charged off.
Hedging
We account for our derivatives and hedging activities in accordance with FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity ("SFAS No. 133"), as amended by FASB Statement No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, and FASB Statement No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
In the normal course of business, we enter into contractual commitments, including loan commitments and rate lock commitments to extend credit to finance residential mortgages. These commitments, which contain fixed expiration dates, offer the borrower an interest rate guarantee provided the loan meets underwriting guidelines and closes within the time frame established by us. Interest rate risk arises on these commitments and subsequently closed loans if interest rates move between the time of the interest rate lock and the delivery of the loan to the investor. Loan commitments related to mortgage loans that are intended to be sold are considered derivatives in accordance with the guidance of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105, Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments. Accordingly, the fair value of these derivatives at the end of the reporting period has been determined through an analysis of changes in market interest rates from the interest rate lock date and loan closing date.
To mitigate the effect of the interest rate risk inherent in providing rate lock commitments, we economically hedge our commitments by entering into best efforts delivery forward loan sale contracts. These forward contracts are marked to market through earnings and are not designated as accounting hedges under Statement No. 133. The change in the fair value of loan commitments and the change in the fair value of forward sales contracts generally move in opposite directions and, accordingly, impact of changes in these valuations on net income during the loan commitments period is generally inconsequential.
Although the forward loan sale contracts also serve as an economic hedge of loans held for sale, forward contracts have not been designated as accounting hedges under Statement No. 133 and, accordingly, loans held for sale are accounted for at the lower of cost or market in accordance with Statement No. 65, Accounting for Certain Mortgage Banking Activities.
Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets
We record a provision for income tax expense based on the amounts of current taxes payable (or refundable) and the change in net deferred tax assets or liabilities during the year. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the tax effects of differing carrying values of assets and liabilities for tax and financial statement purposes that will reverse in future periods. When substantial uncertainty exists concerning the recoverability of a deferred tax asset, the carrying value of the asset is reduced by a valuation allowance. The amount of any valuation allowance established is based upon an estimate of the deferred tax asset that is probable of recovery. The establishment of a valuation allowance increases the provision for income taxes.
22
New Financial Accounting Standards
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payments: an Amendment of FASB Statements 123 and 95. This statement requires that companies recognize to the income statement the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation. This statement requires that stock awards be classified as either an equity award or a liability award. Equity classified awards are valued as of the grant date using either an observable market price or a valuation methodology. Liability classified awards are valued at fair value as of each reporting date. We estimate that this new standard will result in an increase in pretax expense of approximately $72,000 quarterly and $288,000 annually beginning January 1, 2006, the effective date of the standard for us. These estimates are based on the fair values of the options granted as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for those options that have been granted through March 31, 2005. Any options that are granted after March 31, 2005, will impact the estimates we have disclosed above.
Financial Overview
At and for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
We recorded net income of $1.6 million or $0.09 per diluted share for the first quarter of 2005, an increase of 124.2%, compared to first quarter 2004 net income of $719,000 or $0.04 per diluted share. The current year quarterly earnings include the operating results of George Mason, which we purchased in July 2004. Weighted average diluted shares outstanding were 18.8 million and 17.9 million for the first quarter of 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Net interest income increased 61.9% or $3.0 million to $7.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, compared to $4.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, due primarily to increases in loans held for sale, net and loans receivable, net of fees. Non-interest income increased from $877,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 to $5.2 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, due primarily to a $3.6 million increase in net gain on sales of loans and a $524,000 increase in management fee income. The increases in net gain on sales of loans and management fee income were attributable to George Mason. Offsetting these revenue increases were a $475,000 increase in the provision for loan losses, a result of increases in loan volume, and a $5.5 million increase in non-interest expense, primarily attributable to George Mason and continued bank branch expansion.
At March 31, 2005, total assets were $1.28 billion, a $66.8 million or 5.5% increase from assets at December 31, 2004. Loans held for sale, net were $364.1 million at March 31, 2005, compared to $365.5 million at December 31, 2004. Loans receivable, net of fees were $535.7 million at March 31, 2005, an increase of 9.4% from December 31, 2004. The allowance for loan losses was 1.20% of loans receivable, net of fees at each of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. Total deposits at March 31, 2005 were $894.9 million, a $70.7 million or 8.6% increase from December 31, 2004. Demand deposits grew by 4.6% during the first quarter of 2005 and were $110.3 million at March 31, 2005.
At March 31, 2005, non-accrual loans were $604,000, compared to $547,000 at December 31, 2004. Non-accrual loans were 0.11% of total loans receivable at each of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
Return on average assets was 0.57% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, compared to 0.43% for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. Return on average equity was 6.61% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared to 3.14% for the same quarter of the prior year.
2004 Compared to 2003
At December 31, 2004, total assets were $1.21 billion, an increase of 90.4% or $575.3 million, compared to $636.2 million at December 31, 2003. Total loans receivable, net of deferred fees and
23
costs, increased 45.8% or $153.9 million, to $489.9 million at December 31, 2004, compared to $336.0 million at December 31, 2003. Total investment securities increased by $15.9 million or 5.8%, to $289.5 million at December 31, 2004, compared to $273.6 million at December 31, 2003. Total deposits increased 73.8% or $350.1 million, to $824.2 million at December 31, 2004, compared to $474.1 million at December 31, 2003. Other borrowed funds, which primarily include repurchase agreements, FHLB advances and our payable to Cardinal Statutory Trust I, increased $126.6 million to $201.1 million at December 31, 2004, compared to $74.5 million at December 31, 2003. During 2003, we introduced repurchase agreements to our customers, which totaled $25.5 million at December 31, 2003 and $30.4 million at December 31, 2004. Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta were $49.0 million at December 31, 2003, and $137.0 million at December 31, 2004.
Shareholders' equity at December 31, 2004 was $95.1 million, an increase of $9.7 million, compared to $85.4 million at December 31, 2003. The increase in shareholders' equity was primarily attributable to $6.3 million of additional equity raised as a result of the underwriters exercising in January 2004 their over-allotment option in connection with our 2003 stock offering and net income of $3.5 million. Total shareholders' equity to total assets at December 31, 2004 and 2003 were 7.9% and 13.4%, respectively. Book value per share at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $5.15 and $4.80, respectively. Total risk based capital to risk weighted assets was 13.40% at December 31, 2004 compared to 20.66% at December 31, 2003. Accordingly, the Company was considered "well capitalized" for regulatory purposes at December 31, 2004. Risk based capital to risk weighted assets declined from 2003 to 2004 despite our issuance of $20.0 million of trust preferred securities, which is included as a component of regulatory capital, because of our growth during 2004 and the fact that goodwill and intangibles, which increased by $14.7 million as a result of the George Mason acquisition, are excluded from regulatory capital.
We recorded net income of $3.5 million, or $0.19 per diluted common share, for the year ended December 31, 2004, compared to net income of $5.7 million or $0.54 per diluted common share, for the comparable period in 2003. Included in net income in 2003 was an income tax benefit of $3.5 million attributable to the recognition of deferred tax assets since we determined that it was more likely than not that these assets would be utilized. We recorded pretax income of $5.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, compared to $2.6 million for year ended December 31, 2003. The 2003 results included the effect of preferred stock dividends of $495,000. All outstanding shares of the preferred stock were converted into shares of our common stock in March 2004.
The return on average assets for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 was 0.37% and 1.18%, respectively. The return on average equity for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 was 3.69% and 13.84%, respectively.
2003 Compared to 2002
Our net income for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $5.7 million or $0.54 per diluted common share, compared with a loss of $1.0 million or $0.13 per diluted common share for the same period of 2002. The 2002 loss included an other than temporary impairment of $1.7 million of an investment in a WorldCom bond that we recorded in the second quarter of 2002. If the impact of the WorldCom impairment was excluded, we would have reported net income of $636,000, or $0.08 per diluted common share, for the year ended December 31, 2002. The table below shows a reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP financial measures, which we believe appropriately compares our operating results for 2004, 2003 and 2002 by excluding the other than temporary impairment. Results are presented after the effect of dividends paid to preferred shareholders of $495,000 during each of 2003 and 2002. The return on average assets for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 were 1.18% and (0.14)%, respectively. The return on average equity for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 were 13.84% and (1.61)%, respectively.
24
Total assets increased $149.9 million, or 30.8%, to $636.2 million at December 31, 2003, compared to $486.3 million at December 31, 2002. Asset growth was funded primarily by a $72.5 million increase in other borrowed funds to $74.5 million at December 31, 2003, a $44.7 million increase in equity capital which was primarily the result of our secondary stock offering in December 2003, and an increase in deposits of $50.7 million to $474.1 million at December 31, 2003. The strong growth experienced during 2003 is attributed to aggressive promotion of our products through advertising and direct mail in addition to the opening of three branches in 2003.
As noted above, total shareholders' equity increased $44.7 million to $85.4 million at December 31, 2003 compared to $40.7 million at December 31, 2002. This increase was primarily a result of the completion of our secondary common stock offering in December 2003, which raised $41.7 million of additional capital. Book value per common share increased to $4.80 at December 31, 2003 compared to $3.37 at December 31, 2002. The ratio of risk-based capital to risk-based assets increased to 20.66% at December 31, 2003 compared to 13.35% at December 31, 2002. Total shareholders' equity to total assets at December 31, 2003 and 2002 were 13.4% and 8.4%, respectively.
Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reported net income (loss) to common shareholders | $ | 3,469 | $ | 5,659 | $ | (1,024 | ) | ||||
Less impairments: | |||||||||||
Other than temporary impairment of WorldCom bond | — | — | 1,660 | ||||||||
Net income without impairments | $ | 3,469 | $ | 5,659 | $ | 636 | |||||
Reported net income (loss) per common share |
$ |
0.19 |
$ |
0.55 |
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
||||
Less impairments: | |||||||||||
Other than temporary impairment of WorldCom bond | — | — | 0.21 | ||||||||
Earnings per common share without impairments | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.08 | |||||
Statements of Operations
Net Interest Income/Margin
Net interest income is our primary source of revenue, representing the difference between interest and fees earned on interest-bearing assets and the interest paid on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities. The level of net interest income is affected primarily by variations in the volume and mix of these assets and liabilities, as well as changes in interest rates. During 2002 and continuing in 2003, we experienced a weakened economy that had entered into a recessionary phase early in 2001. During 2001, the Federal Reserve lowered rates eleven times in order to generate economic growth. During the fourth quarter of 2002, in response to this weakening economy and the lack of any inflationary pressures, the Federal Reserve lowered rates an additional 50 basis points. During the second quarter of 2003, the Federal Reserve again decreased interest rates another 25 basis points. At the end of 2003, the prime lending rate was at 4.00%, its lowest level in over forty years. During 2004 and into 2005 as economic activity has increased, the Federal Reserve raised the key federal funds rate six times to 2.50%. The prime lending rate increased from 4.00% at the end of 2003 to 5.75% at March 31, 2005. See "Interest Rate Sensitivity" for further information.
Net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was $7.8 million and $4.8 million, respectively, a period-to-period increase of $3.0 million, or 61.9%. The increase in net
25
interest income is primarily the result of the increase in the average volume of loans receivable and loans held for sale compared with the same period of 2004. These increases were funded through the increases in total deposits and other borrowed funds.
Our net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was 2.84% and 3.00%, respectively. This compares to a net interest margin of 2.72% for the year ended December 31, 2004. The decrease in the net interest margin for the period ended March 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, was a result of a higher volume of deposits and borrowings at an increased rate of interest paid than the interest rate received on the increased volume of loans receivable and loans held for sale primarily due to the addition of George Mason in the first quarter of 2005. We remain asset sensitive and therefore anticipate that net interest margin will improve in a rising rate environment. The following tables present an analysis of average earning assets, interest bearing liabilities and demand deposits with related components of interest income and interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
26
Average Balance Sheets and Interest Rates on Earning Assets and Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Average Balance |
Interest Income/ Expense |
Rate |
Average Balance |
Interest Income/ Expense |
Rate |
Average Balance |
Interest Income/ Expense |
Rate |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans (1): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 60,873 | $ | 856 | 5.62 | % | $ | 59,327 | $ | 796 | 5.37 | % | $ | 53,060 | $ | 833 | 6.28 | % | ||||||||||
Real estate—commercial | 223,879 | 3,380 | 6.04 | 137,776 | 2,223 | 6.45 | 115,685 | 2,064 | 7.14 | |||||||||||||||||||
Real estate—construction | 68,969 | 1,117 | 6.48 | 41,609 | 567 | 5.45 | 8,955 | 137 | 6.12 | |||||||||||||||||||
Real estate—residential | 84,962 | 1,143 | 5.38 | 42,871 | 617 | 5.76 | 34,284 | 577 | 6.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines | 61,268 | 684 | 4.53 | 44,829 | 363 | 3.24 | 28,352 | 241 | 3.40 | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 5,909 | 100 | 6.77 | 10,373 | 162 | 6.25 | 9,639 | 179 | 7.43 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total loans | 505,860 | 7,280 | 5.76 | 336,785 | 4,728 | 5.62 | 249,975 | 4,031 | 6.45 | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale, net | 289,024 | 3,358 | 4.65 | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale | 153,907 | 1,431 | 3.72 | 142,128 | 1,271 | 3.58 | 180,044 | 1,678 | 3.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity | 135,945 | 1,307 | 3.85 | 150,016 | 1,350 | 3.60 | — | — | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other investments | 5,172 | 54 | 4.19 | 3,634 | 38 | 4.18 | 1,853 | 24 | 5.18 | |||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold | 11,162 | 61 | 2.20 | 12,146 | 28 | 0.92 | 13,503 | 39 | 1.16 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets and interest income | 1,101,070 | $ | 13,491 | 4.90 | % | 644,709 | $ | 7,415 | 4.60 | % | 445,375 | $ | 5,772 | 5.18 | % | |||||||||||||
Non-interest earning assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks | 2,519 | 10,256 | 14,720 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Premises and equipment, net | 17,000 | 6,833 | 5,007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and other intangibles, net | 14,501 | 22 | 646 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued interest and other assets | 7,804 | 7,212 | 4,467 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (5,988 | ) | (4,408 | ) | (3,397 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,136,906 | $ | 664,624 | $ | 466,818 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest checking | $ | 139,160 | $ | 429 | 1.25 | % | $ | 155,523 | $ | 529 | 1.36 | % | $ | 139,080 | $ | 638 | 1.83 | % | ||||||||||
Money markets | 43,021 | 170 | 1.58 | 24,470 | 36 | 0.59 | 26,131 | 69 | 1.06 | |||||||||||||||||||
Statement savings | 8,688 | 22 | 1.01 | 7,191 | 9 | 0.50 | 4,493 | 9 | 0.80 | |||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit | 553,079 | 4,056 | 2.93 | 237,562 | 1,708 | 2.88 | 173,249 | 1,524 | 3.52 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits | 743,948 | 4,677 | 2.55 | 424,746 | 2,282 | 2.15 | 342,953 | 2,240 | 2.61 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowed funds | 153,580 | 992 | 2.59 | 73,545 | 300 | 1.63 | 14,957 | 73 | 1.95 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities and interest expense | 897,528 | $ | 5,669 | 2.56 | % | 498,291 | $ | 2,582 | 2.07 | % | 357,910 | $ | 2,313 | 2.59 | % | |||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits | 103,883 | 72,399 | 66,638 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 37,980 | 2,204 | 1,588 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred shareholders' equity | — | 6,391 | 6,825 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common shareholders' equity | 97,515 | 85,339 | 33,857 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 1,136,906 | $ | 664,624 | $ | 466,818 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income and net interest margin (2) | $ | 7,822 | 2.84 | % | $ | 4,833 | 3.00 | % | $ | 3,459 | 3.11 | % | ||||||||||||||||
27
Rate and Volume Analysis
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2005 Compared to 2004 |
2004 Compared to 2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change Due to |
|
Change Due to |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Average Volume |
Average Rate |
Increase (Decrease) |
Average Volume |
Average Rate |
Increase (Decrease) |
|||||||||||||||
Interest income: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loans (1): | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 21 | $ | 39 | $ | 60 | $ | 98 | $ | (135 | ) | $ | (37 | ) | |||||||
Real estate—commercial | 1,389 | (232 | ) | 1,157 | 394 | (235 | ) | 159 | |||||||||||||
Real estate—construction | 373 | 177 | 550 | 500 | (70 | ) | 430 | ||||||||||||||
Real estate—residential | 606 | (80 | ) | 526 | 145 | (105 | ) | 40 | |||||||||||||
Home equity lines | 128 | 193 | 321 | 140 | (18 | ) | 122 | ||||||||||||||
Consumer | (70 | ) | 8 | (62 | ) | 14 | (31 | ) | (17 | ) | |||||||||||
Total loans | 2,447 | 105 | 2,552 | 1,291 | (594 | ) | 697 | ||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale, net | 3,358 | — | 3,358 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale | 105 | 55 | 160 | (353 | ) | (54 | ) | (407 | ) | ||||||||||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity | (127 | ) | 84 | (43 | ) | 1,350 | — | 1,350 | |||||||||||||
Other investments | 16 | 0 | 16 | 23 | (9 | ) | 14 | ||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold | (2 | ) | 35 | 33 | (4 | ) | (7 | ) | (11 | ) | |||||||||||
Total interest income | 5,797 | 279 | 6,076 | 2,307 | (664 | ) | 1,643 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest checking | (59 | ) | (41 | ) | (100 | ) | 75 | (184 | ) | (109 | ) | ||||||||||
Money markets | 27 | 107 | 134 | (4 | ) | (29 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||||||||||
Statement savings | 2 | 11 | 13 | 5 | (5 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit | 2,252 | 96 | 2,348 | 565 | (381 | ) | 184 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits | 2,222 | 173 | 2,395 | 641 | (599 | ) | 42 | ||||||||||||||
Other borrowed funds | 318 | 374 | 692 | 286 | (59 | ) | 227 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest expense | 2,540 | 547 | 3,087 | 927 | (658 | ) | 269 | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income (2) | $ | 3,257 | $ | (268 | ) | $ | 2,989 | $ | 1,380 | $ | (6 | ) | $ | 1,374 | |||||||
Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $24.6 million, compared to $15.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $9.4 million, or 61.8%. The increase in net interest income is a result of increases in average volume of investment securities, loans held for sale and loans receivable, net of the impact of decreased yields during 2004, compared with the same period of 2003. These net increases were funded through the increases in total deposits and other borrowed funds.
Our net interest margin for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 was 2.72% and 3.00%, respectively, as a result of earning asset yields declining more quickly than the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The average yield on interest earning assets decreased to 4.49% in 2004 from 4.86% in 2003 and our cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased to 2.17% in 2004 from 2.31% in 2003. The yield on other borrowed funds, which generally are shorter term fundings and which we utilized to a greater extent in 2004 than 2003 as a result of the George Mason acquisition, increased 50 basis points to 2.18% for 2004 compared to 1.68% for 2003.
28
Total earning assets increased by 88.3% to $1.16 billion at December 31, 2004, compared to $616.7 million at December 31, 2003. This resulted primarily from a $365.5 million increase in loans held for sale as a result of our George Mason acquisition and a $153.9 million increase in loans receivable. These increases were funded by deposit growth of $350.1 million, or 73.8%, and other borrowed funds and warehouse financing growth of $156.9 million over December 31, 2003 balances. In addition, other borrowed funds increased by $126.6 million during 2004 to $201.1 million at December 31, 2004, compared to $74.5 million at December 31, 2003.
Average loans receivable increased $118.7 million to $391.4 million during 2004 from $272.8 million in 2003. Average balances of nonperforming assets, which consist of non-accrual loans, are included in the net interest margin calculation and did not have a material impact on our net interest margin in 2004 and 2003. Additional interest income of approximately $25,000 for 2004 and $39,000 for 2003 would have been realized had all nonperforming assets performed as originally expected. Nonperforming assets exclude loans that are both past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest due to an assessment of collectibility.
Average total deposits increased $219.9 million to $652.7 million in 2004 from $432.8 million in 2003. The largest increase in average deposit balances was experienced in certificates of deposit, an increase of $194.8 million compared to 2003, a result of our branch expansion and increased advertising of our rates on certificates of deposit. In addition, to assist in the funding of George Mason's loans held-for-sale, we began using the brokered certificates of deposit market during 2004. At December 31, 2004, we had $86.7 million of brokered certificates of deposit. Our utilization of the brokered certificates of deposit market averaged $52.3 million in 2004.
Net interest income was $15.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, up $4.5 million or 42.3% from 2002. The increase was primarily due to the increase in loans and investment securities available-for-sale during 2003, funded through the increase in total deposits and shareholders' equity. The increase in net interest income was tempered by a reduction in our net interest margin, due primarily to yields on earning assets continuing to decline at a faster pace than the decline in yields on interest bearing liabilities.
Our net interest margin for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 was 3.00% and 2.92%, respectively. The increase in the net interest margin was a result of the decrease in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities offset slightly by the decrease in the yield on average earning assets. The average yield on interest earning assets decreased to 4.86% in 2003 from 5.54% in 2002 and our cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased to 2.31% in 2003 from 3.27% in 2002. The decrease in our cost of interest-bearing deposits is primarily the result of our decreasing the rate on our President's Club relationship product to 1.51%, down from 2.00% at December 31, 2002. In addition, the cost of other borrowed funds decreased 231 basis points to 1.68% at December 31, 2003 compared to December 31, 2002.
Total earning assets increased by 37.0% to $616.7 million at December 31, 2003, compared to $450.3 million at December 31, 2002. This increase consisted mainly of a $86.9 million, or 34.9% increase in loans receivable, net of fees and a $109.9 million, or 67.2% increase in total investment securities. These increases were funded by deposit growth of $50.7 million, or 12.0%, and other borrowed funds growth of $72.5 million over December 31, 2002 balances. In addition, proceeds from our secondary common stock offering of $41.7 million funded our earning asset growth as of December 31, 2003.
Average total loans increased $66.1 million to $272.8 million during 2003 from $206.7 million in 2002. Average balances of non-performing assets, which consist of non-accrual loans, are included in the net interest margin calculation and did not have a material impact on our net interest margin in 2003 and 2002. Additional interest income of approximately $39,000 for 2003 and $37,000 for 2002 would have been realized had all non-performing assets performed as originally expected.
29
Non-performing assets exclude loans that are both past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest due to an assessment of collectibility.
Average total deposits increased $84.7 million to $432.8 million in 2003 from $348.1 million in 2002. The largest increase in average deposit balances was experienced in certificates of deposit, an increase of $42.9 million compared to 2002 and a result of our branch expansion and increased advertising of our rates on certificates of deposit.
The following is a summary of our average earning and non-earning assets and interest-bearing and non-interest-bearing liabilities for the three years ended December 31, 2004 and the resulting yields and cost of funding for those years.
30
Average Balance Sheets and Interest Rates on Earning Assets and Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Average Balance |
Interest Income/ Expense |
Rate |
Average Balance |
Interest Income/ Expense |
Rate |
Average Balance |
Interest Income/ Expense |
Rate |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans(1): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 58,293 | $ | 3,046 | 5.23 | % | $ | 50,188 | $ | 3,101 | 6.18 | % | $ | 52,960 | $ | 3,696 | 6.98 | % | ||||||||||
Real estate—commercial | 170,730 | 10,617 | 6.22 | 121,345 | 8,422 | 6.94 | 91,289 | 7,276 | 7.97 | |||||||||||||||||||
Real estate—construction | 52,459 | 3,024 | 5.76 | 20,427 | 1,131 | 5.54 | 6,156 | 375 | 6.09 | |||||||||||||||||||
Real estate—residential | 49,057 | 2,780 | 5.67 | 38,059 | 2,414 | 6.34 | 20,139 | 1,534 | 7.62 | |||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines | 52,221 | 1,856 | 3.55 | 33,720 | 1,121 | 3.32 | 23,711 | 993 | 4.19 | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 8,665 | 552 | 6.37 | 9,026 | 662 | 7.33 | 12,399 | 924 | 7.45 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total loans | 391,425 | 21,875 | 5.59 | 272,765 | 16,851 | 6.18 | 206,654 | 14,798 | 7.16 | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale, net | 181,700 | 6,814 | 3.75 | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale | 161,741 | 5,830 | 3.60 | 152,915 | 5,026 | 3.29 | 101,589 | 4,501 | 4.43 | |||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity | 151,286 | 5,622 | 3.72 | 67,685 | 2,483 | 3.67 | — | — | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other investments | 6,139 | 251 | 4.09 | 2,906 | 135 | 4.65 | 1,253 | 72 | 5.75 | |||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold | 10,473 | 130 | 1.24 | 9,753 | 107 | 1.10 | 55,773 | 871 | 1.56 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets and interest income | 902,764 | 40,522 | 4.49 | % | 506,024 | 24,602 | 4.86 | % | 365,269 | 20,242 | 5.54 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non-interest-earning assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks | 11,015 | 10,291 | 18,595 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Premises and equipment, net | 11,229 | 5,249 | 4,820 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and other intangibles | 7,515 | 646 | 651 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued interest and other assets | 8,533 | 3,265 | 2,551 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (4,759 | ) | (3,652 | ) | (3,060 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 936,297 | $ | 521,823 | $ | 388,826 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest checking | $ | 151,727 | $ | 2,016 | 1.33 | % | $ | 147,746 | $ | 2,375 | 1.61 | % | $ | 114,350 | $ | 3,073 | 2.69 | % | ||||||||||
Money markets | 26,304 | 155 | 0.59 | 26,722 | 208 | 0.78 | 28,667 | 525 | 1.83 | |||||||||||||||||||
Statement savings | 7,806 | 58 | 0.74 | 5,389 | 35 | 0.65 | 4,305 | 52 | 1.21 | |||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit | 377,770 | 10,465 | 2.77 | 182,922 | 6,038 | 3.30 | 140,033 | 5,714 | 4.08 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits | 563,607 | 12,694 | 2.25 | 362,779 | 8,656 | 2.39 | 287,355 | 9,364 | 3.26 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowed funds | 139,637 | 3,047 | 2.18 | 46,069 | 773 | 1.68 | 5,564 | 222 | 3.99 | |||||||||||||||||||
Warehouse financing | 31,981 | 228 | 0.71 | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities and interest expense | 735,225 | $ | 15,969 | 2.17 | % | 408,848 | $ | 9,429 | 2.31 | % | 292,919 | $ | 9,586 | 3.27 | % | |||||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits | 89,114 | 70,030 | 60,786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 17,847 | 2,043 | 2,282 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred shareholders' equity | 1,589 | 6,824 | 6,825 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common shareholders' equity | 92,522 | 34,078 | 26,014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 936,297 | $ | 521,823 | $ | 388,826 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income and net interest margin(2) |
$ | 24,553 | 2.72 | % | $ | 15,173 | 3.00 | % | $ | 10,656 | 2.92 | % | ||||||||||||||||
31
Rate and Volume Analysis
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2004 Compared to 2003 |
2003 Compared to 2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Average Volume |
Average Rate |
Increase (Decrease) |
Average Volume |
Average Rate |
Increase (Decrease) |
|||||||||||||||
Interest income: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loans (1): |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 501 | $ | (556 | ) | $ | (55 | ) | $ | (193 | ) | $ | (402 | ) | $ | (595 | ) | ||||
Real estate—commercial | 3,428 | (1,233 | ) | 2,195 | 2,396 | (1,250 | ) | 1,146 | |||||||||||||
Real estate—construction | 1,774 | 119 | 1,893 | 869 | (113 | ) | 756 | ||||||||||||||
Real estate—residential | 698 | (332 | ) | 366 | 1,365 | (485 | ) | 880 | |||||||||||||
Home equity lines | 615 | 120 | 735 | 419 | (291 | ) | 128 | ||||||||||||||
Consumer | (26 | ) | (84 | ) | (110 | ) | (251 | ) | (11 | ) | (262 | ) | |||||||||
Total loans | 6,990 | (1,966 | ) | 5,024 | 4,605 | (2,552 | ) | 2,053 | |||||||||||||
Loans held for sale, net | 6,814 | — | 6,814 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale | 290 | 514 | 804 | 2,274 | (1,749 | ) | 525 | ||||||||||||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity | 3,067 | 72 | 3,139 | 2,483 | — | 2,483 | |||||||||||||||
Other investments | 150 | (34 | ) | 116 | 95 | (32 | ) | 63 | |||||||||||||
Federal funds sold | 8 | 15 | 23 | (719 | ) | (45 | ) | (764 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total interest income | 17,319 | (1,399 | ) | 15,920 | 8,738 | (4,378 | ) | 4,360 | |||||||||||||
Interest expense: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Interest checking | 64 | (423 | ) | (359 | ) | 897 | (1,595 | ) | (698 | ) | |||||||||||
Money markets | (3 | ) | (50 | ) | (53 | ) | (36 | ) | (281 | ) | (317 | ) | |||||||||
Statement savings | 16 | 7 | 23 | 13 | (30 | ) | (17 | ) | |||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit | 6,432 | (2,005 | ) | 4,427 | 1,750 | (1,426 | ) | 324 | |||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits | 6,509 | (2,471 | ) | 4,038 | 2,624 | (3,332 | ) | (708 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other borrowed funds | 1,570 | 704 | 2,274 | 1,616 | (1,065 | ) | 551 | ||||||||||||||
Warehouse financing | 228 | — | 228 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total interest expense | 8,307 | (1,767 | ) | 6,540 | 4,240 | (4,397 | ) | (157 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net interest income(2) | $ | 9,012 | $ | 368 | $ | 9,380 | $ | 4,498 | $ | 19 | $ | 4,517 | |||||||||
32
Interest Rate Sensitivity
We are exposed to various business risks including interest rate risk. Our goal is to maximize net interest income without incurring excessive interest rate risk. Management of net interest income and interest rate risk must be consistent with the level of capital and liquidity that we maintain. We manage interest rate risk through an asset and liability committee ("ALCO"). ALCO is responsible for managing the interest rate risk for the company in conjunction with liquidity and capital management.
In managing interest rate sensitivity, the ALCO committee until the third quarter of 2004 primarily used gap analysis. Gap analysis attempts to examine the volume of interest sensitive assets less interest sensitive liabilities in various time intervals. The difference is the interest sensitivity gap which indicates how future changes in interest rates may affect net interest income. At December 31, 2003, we were liability sensitive within a one year time horizon, which means that rising rates had an adverse impact. A negative gap, or liability sensitive position exists when we have more interest sensitive liabilities maturing within a certain time frame than interest sensitive assets.
Based on gap analysis, we could then simulate how changes in interest rates would impact net interest income. We maintained guidelines on both the level of acceptable gaps as well as guidelines for negative variances of net interest income given certain interest rate changes.
Beginning with the interest rate sensitivity analysis for the third quarter of 2004, we hired an independent consulting firm to model the interest rate sensitivity of the company. Instead of gap analysis, we began using a net interest income simulation model as our primary tool to measure interest rate sensitivity. Many assumptions are developed based on expected activity in the balance sheet. For maturing assets, assumptions are created for the redeployment of these assets. For maturing liabilities, assumptions are developed for the replacement of these funding sources. Assumptions are also developed for assets and liabilities that could reprice during the modeled time period. These assumptions also cover how we expect rates to change on non-maturity deposits such as NOW, Money Market and savings accounts. Based on inputs that include the current balance sheet, the current level of interest rates and the developed assumptions, the model then produces an expected level of net interest income assuming that market rates remain unchanged. This is considered the base case. Next, the model determines what net interest income would be given changes in interest rates. The rate simulations performed include a ramped rate change of down 100 basis points and up 200 basis points over a two year time period. In the ramped rate change, the model moves rates gradually down 100 basis points over the first year and then rates remain flat in the second year. For the up 200 basis point scenario, rates are gradually moved up 200 basis points in the first year and then rates remain flat in the second year. In both the up and down scenarios, the model assumes a parallel shift in the yield curve. The results of these simulations are then compared to the base case.
At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we were asset sensitive. Asset sensitive means that we had more assets maturing and repricing than liabilities. We have a significant portion of our assets as floating rate assets and we have taken a significant amount of term funding through fixed rate, fixed term, certificates of deposit. In a rising rate environment, net interest income should grow for an asset sensitive bank. At March 31, 2005, in the up 200 basis point scenario for one year, net interest income would have improved by not more than 10% compared to the base case and by not more than 15% over the two year time horizon. Being asset sensitive, net interest income would have declined compared to the base case in the down 100 basis point scenario. At March 31, 2005, net interest income has a negative variance to the base case of less than 6% for the one year period and a negative variance of less than 9% over the cumulative two year period.
At December 31, 2004, in the up 200 basis point scenario for one year, net interest income would have improved by not more than 10% compared to the base case and by not more than 15% over the two year time horizon. Being asset sensitive, net interest income would have declined compared to the base case in the down 100 basis point scenario. At December 31, 2004, net interest income has a negative variance to the base case of less than 6% for the one year period and a negative variance of less than 10% over the cumulative two year period.
33
Provision Expense and Allowance for Loan Losses
Our policy is to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level that represents our best estimate of known and inherent losses in the loan portfolio. Both the amount of the provision and the level of the allowance for loan losses are impacted by many factors, including general economic conditions, actual and expected credit losses, historical trends and specific conditions of the individual borrower.
The provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was $549,000 and $74,000, respectively. The increase in provision expense is primarily a result of the net increase of $45.8 million in the loan portfolio during the first three months of 2005. The allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 was $6.4 million and $5.9 million, respectively. Our allowance for loan loss ratio was 1.20% at each of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. We continued to experience strong loan quality with annualized net charged-off loans equal to 0.00% of total loans for the three months ended March 31, 2005, compared to 0.08% for the same period of 2004. Non-performing loans were equal to 0.11% of total loans at each of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. Additional information on the allowance for loan losses and its allocation to the total loans receivable portfolio can be found in the tables that follow.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2005 |
2004 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beginning balance, January 1 | $ | 5,878 | $ | 4,344 | ||||
Provision for loan losses | 549 | 74 | ||||||
Loans charged off: | ||||||||
Commercial and industrial | — | (74 | ) | |||||
Consumer | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Total loans charged off | (1 | ) | (75 | ) | ||||
Recoveries: |
||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Consumer | 4 | 2 | ||||||
Total recoveries | 6 | 4 | ||||||
Net (charge offs) recoveries |
5 |
(71 |
) |
|||||
Ending balance, March 31, | $ | 6,432 | $ | 4,347 | ||||
March 31, 2005 |
December 31, 2004 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Loans: | ||||||||
Balance at period end | $ | 535,704 | $ | 489,896 | ||||
Allowance for loan losses to loans receivable, net of fees | 1.20 | % | 1.20 | % | ||||
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans receivable | 0.00 | % | 0.02 | % |
34
Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses
At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
|
March 31, 2005 |
December 31, 2004 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Allocation |
% of Total* |
Allocation |
% of Total* |
|||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 1,148 | 11.32 | % | $ | 963 | 11.53 | % | |||
Real estate—commercial | 2,838 | 43.53 | % | 2,732 | 44.88 | % | |||||
Real estate—construction | 838 | 14.22 | % | 768 | 14.18 | % | |||||
Real estate—residential | 936 | 18.61 | % | 692 | 15.69 | % | |||||
Home equity lines | 570 | 11.45 | % | 612 | 12.32 | % | |||||
Consumer | 102 | 0.87 | % | 111 | 1.40 | % | |||||
Total allowance for loan losses | $ | 6,432 | 100.00 | % | $ | 5,878 | 100.00 | % | |||
The provision for loan losses was $1.6 million and $1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2004 was $5.9 million compared to $4.3 million at December 31, 2003. Our allowance for loan loss ratio at December 31, 2004 was 1.20% compared to 1.29% at December 31, 2003. The decrease in the allowance for loan loss ratio is primarily reflective of the shift in the loan mix in our portfolio and a slight improvement in overall loan quality. Our growth in the loan portfolio was mostly comprised of increases in our residential and commercial real estate loans and home equity loan portfolios, which require lower reserve coverage than other portions of the loan portfolio. We continued to experience strong loan quality with annualized net charged-off loans equal to 0.02% to average loans receivable for the year ended December 31, 2004, and non-performing loans equal to 0.11% of total loans as of December 31, 2004.
Provision for loan losses was $444,000 for 2002. The growth in loans during 2002 was comprised primarily of increases in our residential and home equity loan portfolios, which require lower reserve amounts than the remainder of the loan portfolio.
See "Critical Accounting Policies" above for more information on our allowance for loan losses methodology.
The following tables contain additional information pertaining to the calculation and allocation of the allowance for loan losses by loan type and the percentage of the loan type to the total loan portfolio.
35
Allowance for Loan Losses
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beginning balance, January 1 | $ | 4,344 | $ | 3,372 | $ | 3,104 | $ | 1,900 | $ | 726 | |||||||
Provision for loan losses |
1,626 |
1,001 |
444 |
1,202 |
753 |
||||||||||||
Transfer to liability on unfunded commitments |
— |
— |
(74 |
) |
— |
— |
|||||||||||
Assumed allowance for loan losses from acquisition of Heritage Bancorp, Inc. |
— |
— |
— |
— |
421 |
||||||||||||
Loans charged off: |
|||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | (100 | ) | (74 | ) | (63 | ) | — | — | |||||||||
Consumer | (8 | ) | (6 | ) | (54 | ) | — | — | |||||||||
Total loans charged off | (108 | ) | (80 | ) | (117 | ) | — | — | |||||||||
Recoveries: |
|||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 14 | 43 | 12 | 2 | — | ||||||||||||
Consumer | 2 | 8 | 3 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Total recoveries | 16 | 51 | 15 | 2 | — | ||||||||||||
Net (charge offs) recoveries |
(92 |
) |
(29 |
) |
(102 |
) |
2 |
— |
|||||||||
Ending balance, December 31, |
$ |
5,878 |
$ |
4,344 |
$ |
3,372 |
$ |
3,104 |
$ |
1,900 |
|||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Loans: | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at year end | $ | 489,896 | $ | 336,002 | $ | 249,106 | $ | 200,911 | $ | 154,271 | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses to loans receivable, net of fees | 1.20 | % | 1.29 | % | 1.35 | % | 1.54 | % | 1.23 | % | |||||||
Net charge-offs to average loans receivable | 0.02 | % | 0.01 | % | 0.05 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % |
Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses
At December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Allocation |
% of Total* |
Allocation |
% of Total* |
Allocation |
% of Total* |
Allocation |
% of Total* |
Allocation |
% of Total* |
|||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 963 | 11.53 | % | $ | 1,046 | 17.21 | % | $ | 1,301 | 23.40 | % | $ | 1,149 | 28.71 | % | $ | 612 | 32.22 | % | |||||||
Real estate—commercial | 2,732 | 44.88 | 1,662 | 41.56 | 1,386 | 46.63 | 1,270 | 43.37 | 678 | 37.05 | |||||||||||||||||
Real estate—construction | 768 | 14.18 | 497 | 12.57 | 19 | 2.32 | 34 | 3.18 | 50 | 2.65 | |||||||||||||||||
Real estate—residential | 692 | 15.69 | 418 | 12.64 | 241 | 12.77 | 98 | 7.20 | 181 | 11.51 | |||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines | 612 | 12.32 | 486 | 12.84 | 201 | 10.77 | 176 | 10.60 | 126 | 9.65 | |||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 111 | 1.40 | 235 | 3.18 | 224 | 4.11 | 377 | 6.94 | 253 | 6.92 | |||||||||||||||||
Total allowance for loan losses | $ | 5,878 | 100.00 | % | $ | 4,344 | 100.00 | % | $ | 3,372 | 100.00 | % | $ | 3,104 | 100.00 | % | $ | 1,900 | 100.00 | % | |||||||
36
Non-Interest Income
Non-interest income includes service charges on deposits and loans, gains on the sale of loans held for sale, investment fee income, management fee income and gains on sales of investment securities available-for-sale and continues to be an important factor in our operating results. Non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was $5.2 million and $877,000, respectively, a period-to-period increase of $4.3 million. The increase in non-interest income is primarily attributable to the increase in net gains on sale of loans held for sale by George Mason of $3.6 million and an increase in management fee income of $524,000 attributable to George Mason. Management fee income represents the income earned for services provided to other mortgage banking companies owned by local home builders. Gains on the sale of loans held for sale include the gross gains on the sale of mortgage loans, net of origination costs. Included in the gross gains on sale of mortgage loans are any origination, underwriting, and discount points and other funding fees received and deferred at origination. Costs, which are originally capitalized when the loan closes and are deferred and subsequently recognized when the loan is sold, include direct costs associated with origination, such as commissions and direct salaries for funded loans.
Service charges on deposit accounts increased $39,000 to $280,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the same period of 2004. Loan service charge income increased $431,000 to $626,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005, compared to $195,000 for the same period of 2004, primarily related to the inclusion of George Mason in the 2005 period. Investment fee income decreased slightly to $159,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to $178,000 for the same three month period of 2004.
Non-interest income for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $9.4 million and $3.8 million, respectively. The increase in non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2004, compared to the same period of 2003, is primarily the result of increased gains on the sale of loans held for sale of $4.4 million as a result of our acquisition of George Mason in July 2004. Also contributing to the increase in non-interest income, and also as a direct result of the George Mason acquisition, management fee income rose by $1.7 million from 2003 to 2004. Offsetting these increases was a $1.1 million decrease in gains on sales of investment securities available-for-sale from 2003 to 2004. The 2003 gains on the sale of investment securities available-for-sale were recorded on sales of mortgage-backed securities with accelerated prepayment speeds, a result of the lower interest rate environment experienced during 2003. Service charges on deposit accounts increased and investment fees decreased slightly from 2003 levels. Deposit service charges increased primarily as a result of an increased number of transaction accounts and investment fees decreased primarily as a result of reduced finders fees earned by Cardinal Wealth Services. Loan service charges increased by $576,000 from 2003 to 2004.
Non-interest income increased by $965,000 from 2002 to 2003. As previously noted, due to the interest rate condition, we recorded gains on investment securities available-for-sale during 2003. In 2003, these gains were $840,000 greater than in 2002. In addition, gains on the sale of loans held for sale increased by $208,000 from 2002 to 2003. These gains, along with a $66,000 increase in service charges on deposit accounts, were partially offset by a $155,000 reduction in investment fee income.
37
The following table provides additional detail on non-interest income for the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, and for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002.
Non-Interest Income
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2004 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||||
Insufficient funds fee income | $ | 135 | $ | 113 | $ | 540 | $ | 400 | $ | 305 | |||||
Service charges on deposit accounts | 47 | 57 | 202 | 231 | 206 | ||||||||||
Other fee income on deposit accounts | 13 | 27 | 101 | 134 | 195 | ||||||||||
ATM transaction fees | 73 | 33 | 205 | 107 | 100 | ||||||||||
Loan service charges | 626 | 195 | 958 | 382 | 392 | ||||||||||
Investment fee income | 159 | 178 | 657 | 785 | 940 | ||||||||||
Net gain on sales of loans | 3,581 | 13 | 4,696 | 282 | 74 | ||||||||||
Management fee income | 524 | — | 1,749 | — | — | ||||||||||
Net realized gain on investment securities available-for-sale | — | 241 | 245 | 1,364 | 524 | ||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on sales of assets | 3 | — | (1 | ) | — | 39 | |||||||||
Credit card fees | 12 | 11 | 41 | 46 | 46 | ||||||||||
Other income | 10 | 9 | 16 | 98 | 43 | ||||||||||
Total non-interest income | $ | 5,183 | $ | 877 | $ | 9,409 | $ | 3,829 | $ | 2,864 | |||||
Non-Interest Expense
Non-interest expense includes salaries and benefits, occupancy, professional fees, depreciation, data processing, telecommunications and miscellaneous expenses. Non-interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $10.1 million, compared to $4.6 million for the same period of 2004, an increase of $5.5 million. The increase is attributable to the addition of George Mason and the branch expansion we have completed over the past twelve months. During the twelve months ended March 31, 2005, we opened seven branch banking facilities, including our nineteenth branch, which is located in Sterling, Virginia, in January 2005. Expenses related to the branch expansion are represented in the increases in our salaries and benefits expense, occupancy expense and depreciation expense. We expect non-interest expense to continue to increase going forward as we continue our branch expansion in 2005.
In January 2005, we began deferred compensation plans for our directors and certain employees. As of March 31, 2005, we had a deferred compensation liability of $281,000, and the deferred compensation expense during the quarter ended March 31, 2005 was $21,000.
Non-interest expense was $27.2 million and $15.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, an increase of $11.8 million, or 76.8%. The increase in non-interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2004, compared to 2003, is primarily the result of our George Mason acquisition and the branch expansion that has occurred over the past twelve months. Expenses related to the branch expansion are represented in the increases in our salaries and benefits expense and occupancy expense. Expenses have also increased in professional fees, marketing and advertising, and loan expenses to support our branch openings and strong asset growth over the past year.
38
Non-interest expense was $15.4 million and $13.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase in non-interest expense was $1.8 million, or 12.9% for 2003 compared to 2002. During the second quarter of 2002, we recorded an other than temporary impairment of $1.7 million on an investment in a WorldCom bond. Increases in substantially all components of non-interest expense from 2002 to 2003 more than offset the year-to-year decrease attributable to the WorldCom bond, with salaries and benefits increasing $1.1 million or 18.9%, a $587,000 or 60.4% increase in occupancy costs, and a $294,000 or 39.9% increase in depreciation.
The following table reflects the components of non-interest expense for the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, and for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.
Non-Interest Expense
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2004 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||||
Salary and benefits | $ | 4,870 | $ | 2,164 | $ | 13,354 | $ | 6,797 | $ | 5,715 | |||||
Occupancy | 1,046 | 496 | 2,897 | 1,559 | 972 | ||||||||||
Professional fees | 474 | 154 | 1,610 | 1,113 | 1,011 | ||||||||||
Depreciation | 680 | 310 | 1,838 | 1,030 | 736 | ||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles | 49 | — | 49 | — | 22 | ||||||||||
Writedown on corporate bond | — | — | — | — | 1,660 | ||||||||||
Data processing | 508 | 195 | 969 | 835 | 759 | ||||||||||
Stationary and supplies | 366 | 104 | 965 | 387 | 317 | ||||||||||
Advertising and marketing | 394 | 430 | 1,613 | 913 | 540 | ||||||||||
Telecommunications | 333 | 103 | 611 | 396 | 276 | ||||||||||
Other taxes | 345 | 109 | 548 | 390 | 248 | ||||||||||
Travel and entertainment | 131 | 47 | 427 | 138 | 127 | ||||||||||
Bank operations | 207 | 120 | 676 | 635 | 411 | ||||||||||
Premises and equipment | 315 | 112 | 800 | 351 | 365 | ||||||||||
Miscellaneous | 377 | 211 | 797 | 811 | 446 | ||||||||||
Total non-interest expense | $ | 10,095 | $ | 4,555 | $ | 27,154 | $ | 15,355 | $ | 13,605 | |||||
Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2005 was 31.7%, compared to 33.5% for the same period of 2004. The 2005 effective rate is based on the estimated annual effective tax rate. We recorded a provision for income tax expense of $749,000 and $362,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
We recorded a provision for income tax expense of $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. Our effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2004 was 33.0%
We recorded an income tax benefit of $3.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2003 attributable to the recognition of deferred tax assets related to the net operating loss carryforwards. The benefit of our deferred tax asset was recognized based on a detailed assessment indicating that it is more likely than not that the benefit of these net operating losses would be realized. Factors that were considered in our decision to record our income tax benefit were 2003 profitability, future projections of continued
39
profitability and the completion of our common stock offering in December 2003. For more information, see "Critical Accounting Policies" earlier in this discussion. In addition, note 12 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements provides additional information with respect to the deferred tax accounts and the net operating loss carryforward.
Statements of Condition
Loans Receivable, Net
Loans receivable, net of deferred fees and costs, increased by $45.8 million, or 9.4%, to $535.7 million at March 31, 2005 from $489.9 million at December 31, 2004 (see the following table for details on the loans receivable portfolio). We experienced growth in our commercial and industrial, commercial real estate, real estate construction, residential real estate and home equity loan portfolios. We expect continued growth within these loan categories over the next three quarters of 2005 due to our increased legal lending limit of $14.3 million and the volume of loans we have scheduled for funding. In addition, we had $364.1 million in loans held for sale at March 31, 2005, compared to $365.5 million at December 31, 2004, a decrease of $1.3 million. Loans that are held for sale are valued at the lower of cost or market value.
Total loans receivable, net of fees, were $489.9 million at December 31, 2004, an increase of $153.9 million, or 45.8%, compared to December 31, 2003. We achieved growth in all our loan categories with the exception of our commercial and industrial loans, and consumer loans. Commercial and industrial loans decreased $1.3 million as a result of experiencing more loan payoffs than fundings in this loan category. Consumer loans declined $3.9 million, or 36.2%, from December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2004, primarily as a result of repayments of boat loan participations that were purchased in 1999. As a result of our George Mason acquisition, we had $365.5 million of loans held for sale at December 31, 2004.
Loans receivable accounted for on a non-accrual basis at December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 were $547,000 and $390,000, respectively. Accruing loans, which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest payments as of December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, were $0 and $4,000, respectively. There are no loans as of December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 which are "troubled debt restructurings" as defined in FASB Statement No. 15, Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructurings.
Interest income on non-accrual loans, if recognized, is recorded using the cash basis method of accounting. When a loan is placed on non-accrual, unpaid interest is reversed against interest income if it was accrued in the current year and is charged to the allowance for loan losses if it was accrued in prior years. While on non-accrual, the collection of interest is recorded as interest income only after all principal has been collected. When all past contractual obligations are collected and, in our opinion, the borrower has demonstrated the ability to remain current, the loan is returned to an accruing status. Gross interest income that would have been recorded if the non-accrual loans had been current with their original terms and had been outstanding throughout the period or since origination if held for part of the period for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 were $25,000 and $39,000, respectively. The interest income realized prior to the loans being placed on non-accrual status for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 were $21,000 and $1,000, respectively.
Total loans receivable, net of fees, increased $86.9 million to $336.0 million at December 31, 2003, as compared to December 31, 2002. The strongest growth was in commercial real estate loans, residential real estate loans and real estate construction loans.
Loans receivable accounted for on a non-accrual basis at December 31, 2002 was $917,000. Accruing loans, which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest payments as of December 31, 2002 was $59,000. There are no loans as of December 31, 2002 which are "troubled
40
debt restructurings" as defined in FASB Statement No. 15, Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructurings. Gross interest income that would have been recorded if the non-accrual loans had been current with their original terms and had been outstanding throughout the period, or since origination if held for part of the period for 2002 was $37,000.
The ratio of non-performing loans to total loans was 0.11%, 0.12% and 0.39% at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
The following tables represent the composition of our loans receivable portfolio at March 31, 2005 and at the end of each of the five years ended December 31, 2004 with additional information on non-performing loans receivable.
Loans Receivable
At March 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000
(Dollars in thousands)
|
March 31, 2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Commercial and industrial | $ | 60,655 | 11.32 | % | $ | 56,512 | 11.53 | % | $ | 57,854 | 17.21 | % | $ | 58,292 | 23.40 | % | $ | 57,665 | 28.71 | % | $ | 49,646 | 32.22 | % | |||||||
Real estate—commercial | 233,324 | 43.53 | 220,012 | 44.88 | 139,725 | 41.56 | 116,135 | 46.63 | 87,116 | 43.37 | 57,083 | 37.05 | |||||||||||||||||||
Real estate—construction | 76,186 | 14.22 | 69,535 | 14.18 | 42,243 | 12.57 | 5,781 | 2.32 | 6,397 | 3.18 | 4,088 | 2.65 | |||||||||||||||||||
Real estate—residential | 99,763 | 18.61 | 76,932 | 15.69 | 42,495 | 12.64 | 31,808 | 12.77 | 14,469 | 7.20 | 17,729 | 11.51 | |||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines | 61,361 | 11.45 | 60,408 | 12.32 | 43,176 | 12.84 | 26,831 | 10.77 | 21,299 | 10.60 | 14,867 | 9.65 | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 4,667 | 0.87 | 6,816 | 1.40 | 10,690 | 3.18 | 10,235 | 4.11 | 13,941 | 6.94 | 10,665 | 6.92 | |||||||||||||||||||
Gross loans | $ | 535,956 | 100.00 | % | $ | 490,215 | 100.00 | % | $ | 336,183 | 100.00 | % | $ | 249,082 | 100.00 | % | $ | 200,887 | 100.00 | % | $ | 154,078 | 100.00 | % | |||||||
Add: net deferred (fees) costs |
(252 |
) |
(319 |
) |
(181 |
) |
24 |
24 |
193 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: allowance for loan losses | (6,432 | ) | (5,878 | ) | (4,344 | ) | (3,372 | ) | (3,104 | ) | (1,900 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans receivable, net | $ | 529,272 | $ | 484,018 | $ | 331,658 | $ | 245,734 | $ | 197,807 | $ | 152,371 | |||||||||||||||||||
Non-Performing Loans Receivable
At March 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, and 2000
(Dollars in thousands)
|
March 31, 2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonaccruing loans | $ | 604 | $ | 547 | $ | 390 | $ | 917 | $ | 361 | $ | 585 | ||||||
Loans contractually past-due 90 days or more |
— |
— |
4 |
59 |
566 |
2 |
||||||||||||
Total non-performing loans receivable |
$ |
604 |
$ |
547 |
$ |
394 |
$ |
976 |
$ |
927 |
$ |
587 |
||||||
41
The following table presents information on loan maturities and interest rate sensitivity.
Loan Maturities and Interest Rate Sensitivity
At December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
|
One Year or Less |
Between One and Five Years |
After Five Years |
Total |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Commercial and industrial | $ | 25,701 | $ | 21,280 | $ | 9,531 | $ | 56,512 | ||||
Real estate—commercial | 5,993 | 45,625 | 168,394 | 220,012 | ||||||||
Real estate—construction | 47,676 | 19,791 | 2,068 | 69,535 | ||||||||
Real estate—residential | 2,546 | 2,714 | 71,672 | 76,932 | ||||||||
Home equity lines | — | 3,298 | 57,110 | 60,408 | ||||||||
Consumer | 659 | 4,315 | 1,842 | 6,816 | ||||||||
Total loans receivable | $ | 82,575 | $ | 97,023 | $ | 310,617 | $ | 490,215 | ||||
Fixed—rate loans |
$ |
34,463 |
$ |
78,449 |
$ |
112,912 |
||||||
Floating—rate loans | 62,560 | 232,168 | 294,728 | |||||||||
Total loans receivable for loans maturing after one year | $ | 97,023 | $ | 310,617 | $ | 407,640 | ||||||
Investment Securities
Our investment securities portfolio is used as a source of income and liquidity. Investment securities were $296.8 million at March 31, 2005, compared to $289.5 million at December 31, 2004, an increase of $7.3 million. The investment portfolio consists of investment securities available-for-sale and investment securities held-to-maturity. Investment securities held-to-maturity are those securities that we have the intent and ability to hold to maturity and are carried at amortized cost. Investment securities available-for-sale are those securities that we intend to hold for an indefinite period of time, but not necessarily until maturity. These securities are carried at fair value and may be sold as part of an asset/liability strategy, liquidity management, regulatory capital management or similar factors. At March 31, 2005, investment securities available-for-sale were $163.4 million and investment securities held-to-maturity were $133.4 million. See the following table for additional information on our investment securities portfolio.
42
Investment Securities
At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
Available-for-sale at March 31, 2005 |
Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
Average Yield |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies and enterprises | |||||||||||
One to five years | $ | 15,965 | $ | 15,793 | 4.05 | % | |||||
Five to ten years | 3,000 | 2,977 | 4.48 | ||||||||
Total U.S. government-sponsored agencies | $ | 18,965 | $ | 18,770 | 4.12 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities* | |||||||||||
One to five years | $ | 2,025 | $ | 1,980 | 3.64 | ||||||
Five to ten years | 18,870 | 18,596 | 4.21 | ||||||||
After ten years | 125,442 | 122,038 | 4.08 | ||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | $ | 146,337 | $ | 142,614 | 4.09 | ||||||
Treasury bonds | |||||||||||
One to five years | $ | 2,027 | $ | 1,993 | 2.63 | ||||||
Total treasury bonds | $ | 2,027 | $ | 1,993 | 2.63 | ||||||
Total investment securities available-for-sale | $ | 167,329 | $ | 163,377 | 4.07 | % | |||||
Held-to-maturity at March 31, 2005 |
Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
Average Yield |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies and enterprises | |||||||||||
One to five years | $ | 6,500 | $ | 6,315 | 3.36 | % | |||||
Five to ten years | 16,019 | 15,607 | 4.26 | ||||||||
After ten years | 2,999 | 2,993 | 4.20 | ||||||||
Total U.S. government-sponsored agencies | $ | 25,518 | $ | 24,915 | 4.03 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities* | |||||||||||
Five to ten years | $ | 9,900 | $ | 9,776 | 4.07 | ||||||
After ten years | 90,012 | 88,166 | 4.16 | ||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | $ | 99,912 | $ | 97,942 | 4.15 | ||||||
Corporate bonds | |||||||||||
After ten years | $ | 8,005 | $ | 7,860 | 4.21 | ||||||
Total corporate bonds | $ | 8,005 | $ | 7,860 | 4.21 | ||||||
Total investment securities held-to-maturity | $ | 133,435 | $ | 130,717 | 4.13 | ||||||
Total investment securities | $ | 300,764 | $ | 294,094 | 4.10 | % | |||||
43
Available-for-sale at December 31, 2004 |
Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
Average Yield |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies and enterprises | |||||||||||
One to five years | $ | 3,000 | $ | 2,947 | 3.33 | % | |||||
Five to ten years | 3,000 | 3,009 | 4.46 | ||||||||
Total U.S. government-sponsored agencies | $ | 6,000 | $ | 5,956 | 3.89 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities* | |||||||||||
One to five years | $ | 2,161 | $ | 2,131 | 3.59 | ||||||
Five to ten years | 14,662 | 14,603 | 3.96 | ||||||||
After ten years | 128,477 | 126,846 | 3.97 | ||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | $ | 145,300 | $ | 143,580 | 3.96 | ||||||
Treasury bonds | |||||||||||
One to five years | $ | 2,031 | $ | 2,018 | 2.63 | ||||||
Total treasury bonds | $ | 2,031 | $ | 2,018 | 2.63 | ||||||
Total investment securities available-for-sale | $ | 153,331 | $ | 151,554 | 3.94 | % | |||||
Held-to-maturity at December 31, 2004 |
Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
Average Yield |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies and enterprises | |||||||||||
One to five years | $ | 6,500 | $ | 6,427 | 3.36 | % | |||||
Five to ten years | 16,018 | 15,901 | 4.28 | ||||||||
After ten years | 2,999 | 2,962 | 4.22 | ||||||||
Total U.S. government-sponsored agencies | $ | 25,517 | $ | 25,290 | 4.03 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities* | |||||||||||
Five to ten years | $ | 10,392 | $ | 10,406 | 3.83 | ||||||
After ten years | 94,039 | 92,990 | 4.04 | ||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | $ | 104,431 | $ | 103,396 | 4.02 | ||||||
Corporate bonds | |||||||||||
After ten years | $ | 8,005 | $ | 7,923 | 4.21 | ||||||
Total corporate bonds | $ | 8,005 | $ | 7,923 | 4.21 | ||||||
Total investment securities held-to-maturity | $ | 137,953 | $ | 136,609 | 4.03 | ||||||
Total investment securities | $ | 291,284 | $ | 288,163 | 3.98 | % | |||||
44
Investment securities were $289.5 million at December 31, 2004, an increase of $15.9 million or 5.8%, compared to investment securities at December 31, 2003.
During the third quarter of 2003, we transferred a portion of the available-for-sale investment securities portfolio to the held-to-maturity investment securities portfolio. Of the $289.5 million investment portfolio at December 31, 2004, $138.0 million were classified as held-to-maturity and $151.6 million were classified as available-for-sale. At December 31, 2004, the yield on the available-for-sale investment portfolio was 3.94% and the yield on the held-to-maturity portfolio was 3.98%.
Also, during the third quarter of 2003, we implemented a $25.0 million leverage strategy that allowed us to take advantage of the availability of low cost funds through advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and purchase mortgage-backed investment securities. The impact of this strategy is an increase of approximately $100,000 in net interest income on a quarterly basis.
Total investment securities increased to $273.6 million at December 31, 2003, compared to $163.7 million at December 31, 2002. Strong deposit growth during 2003 made more funds available for investments. The portfolio yield decreased from 4.33% as of December 31, 2002 to 3.96% as of December 31, 2003 due to higher yielding investments having matured, been called or sold for a net realized gain and purchases of additional investments during 2003 yielding lower rates. The amount of investment securities available-for-sale decreased from December 31, 2002 to December 31, 2003 as a result of the previously mentioned reclassification of securities available-for-sale into the securities held-to-maturity category during the third quarter of 2003.
45
The following table reflects the composition of the investment portfolio at December 31, 2003 and 2002.
Investment Securities
At December 31, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
Available-for-sale at December 31, 2003 |
Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
Average Yield |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies and enterprises | |||||||||||
One to five years | $ | 3,000 | $ | 3,016 | 3.92 | % | |||||
Five to ten years | 2,000 | 1,986 | 4.23 | ||||||||
After ten years | 1,000 | 1,027 | 5.79 | ||||||||
Total U.S. government-sponsored agencies | $ | 6,000 | $ | 6,029 | 4.33 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities* |
|||||||||||
Five to ten years | $ | 15,615 | $ | 15,630 | 3.92 | ||||||
After ten years | 97,865 | 97,041 | 4.02 | ||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | $ | 113,480 | $ | 112,671 | 4.00 | ||||||
Corporate bonds |
|||||||||||
After ten years | $ | 10,000 | $ | 9,995 | 2.41 | ||||||
Total corporate bonds | $ | 10,000 | $ | 9,995 | 2.41 | ||||||
Treasury bonds |
|||||||||||
One to five years | $ | 2,047 | $ | 2,067 | 2.64 | ||||||
Total treasury bonds | $ | 2,047 | $ | 2,067 | 2.64 | ||||||
Total investment securities available-for-sale | $ | 131,527 | $ | 130,762 | 3.87 | % | |||||
Held-to-maturity at December 31, 2003 |
Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
Average Yield |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies and enterprises | |||||||||||
One to five years | $ | 4,000 | $ | 3,951 | 3.39 | % | |||||
Five to ten years | 9,993 | 9,884 | 4.65 | ||||||||
After ten years | 2,999 | 2,950 | 4.20 | ||||||||
Total U.S. government-sponsored agencies | $ | 16,992 | $ | 16,785 | 4.27 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities* |
|||||||||||
Five to ten years | $ | 9,476 | $ | 9,450 | 3.70 | ||||||
After ten years | 108,384 | 107,547 | 4.01 | ||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | $ | 117,860 | $ | 116,997 | 3.98 | ||||||
Corporate bonds |
|||||||||||
After ten years | $ | 8,000 | $ | 7,848 | 4.21 | ||||||
Total corporate bonds | $ | 8,000 | $ | 7,848 | 4.21 | ||||||
Total investment securities held-to-maturity | $ | 142,852 | $ | 141,630 | 4.03 | ||||||
Total investment securities | $ | 274,379 | $ | 272,392 | 3.96 | % | |||||
46
Available-for-sale at December 31, 2002 |
Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
Average Yield |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies and enterprises | |||||||||||
One to five years | $ | 26,739 | $ | 26,988 | 3.47 | % | |||||
Five to ten years | 12,048 | 12,048 | 3.68 | ||||||||
Total U.S. government-sponsored agencies | $ | 38,787 | $ | 39,036 | 3.53 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities* |
|||||||||||
Within one year | $ | 15,478 | $ | 15,750 | 3.61 | ||||||
One to five years | 70,552 | 72,342 | 4.82 | ||||||||
Five to ten years | 13,695 | 13,686 | 4.43 | ||||||||
After ten years | 15,301 | 15,301 | 5.20 | ||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | $ | 115,026 | $ | 117,079 | 4.66 | ||||||
Corporate bonds |
|||||||||||
After ten years | $ | 5,000 | $ | 5,000 | 3.39 | ||||||
Total corporate bonds | $ | 5,000 | $ | 5,000 | 3.39 | ||||||
Treasury bonds |
|||||||||||
One to five years | $ | 2,507 | $ | 2,550 | 2.67 | ||||||
Total treasury bonds | $ | 2,507 | $ | 2,550 | 2.67 | ||||||
Total investment securities available-for-sale | $ | 161,320 | $ | 163,665 | 4.33 | % | |||||
Deposits and Other Borrowed Funds
Total deposits increased $70.7 million, or 8.6%, to $894.9 million at March 31, 2005, compared to $824.2 million at December 31, 2004 (see the following table for details on certificates of deposit with balances of $100,000 or more). We experienced increases in non-interest bearing demand deposits, money market and savings deposits and certificates of deposit. The increase in deposits is a result of new customers from our branch expansion, competitive deposit pricing and increased advertising efforts. Brokered certificates of deposit decreased $20.0 million to $66.7 million at March 31, 2005 compared to $86.7 million at December 31, 2004. Additional information on brokered certificates of deposit can be found in "Contractual Obligations" below.
Certificates of Deposit of $100,000 or More
At March 31, 2005
(Dollars in thousands)
Maturities: | |||
Three months or less | $ | 22,826 | |
Over three months through six months | 22,983 | ||
Over six months through twelve months | 16,316 | ||
Over twelve months | 163,226 | ||
$ | 225,351 | ||
Other borrowed funds decreased $12.4 million to $188.7 million at March 31, 2005, compared to $201.1 million at December 31, 2004. We had Federal Home Loan Bank advances that matured during
47
the first quarter of 2005 and were able to replace this funding source with other short term funding and through our increased deposit growth.
The following table reflects the short-term FHLB advances outstanding as of March 31, 2005.
Short-Term Borrowings and Other Borrowed Funds
At March 31, 2005
(Dollars in thousands)
Advance Date |
Original Term of Advance |
Date Amount Due |
Interest Rate |
Outstanding |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul-04 | 12 months | Jul-05 | 3.01 | % | $ | 25,000 | ||||
Jan-04 | 18 months | Jul-05 | 1.83 | 5,000 | ||||||
Mar-03 | 3 years | Mar-06 | 2.33 | 1,000 | ||||||
Total short-term FHLB advances and weighted average rate | 2.80 | % | $ | 31,000 | ||||||
All other borrowed funds | 2.55 | % | $ | 157,715 | ||||||
Total other borrowed funds | 2.59 | % | $ | 188,715 | ||||||
At March 31, 2005, mortgage check fundings increased by $27.9 million to $74.3 million, compared to $46.4 million at December 31, 2004. Warehouse financing decreased to zero at March 31, 2005 compared to $30.2 million at December 31, 2004. These liabilities are related to George Mason and are used to fund the loans in process of being sold. George Mason has credit facilities with the Bank and has a third party facility totaling $250 million, of which there were no borrowings outstanding at March 31, 2005. George Mason had a $60.0 million line of credit with an unaffiliated third party and, due to our limited use, we did not renew this line of credit after it matured on March 1, 2005.
Total deposits were $824.2 million at December 31, 2004, an increase of $350.1 million, or 73.8%, compared to December 31, 2003. This growth is primarily attributable to the opening of seven branch offices during 2004. In addition, to assist in the funding of George Mason's loans held-for-sale, we began using the brokered certificates of deposit market during 2004. At December 31, 2004, we had $86.7 million of brokered certificates of deposit at an average rate of 2.16%. Our utilization of the brokered certificates of deposit market averaged $52.3 million in 2004.
Other borrowed funds, which primarily include repurchase agreements, FHLB advances, and our payable to Cardinal Statutory Trust I, were $201.1 million at December 31, 2004, an increase of $126.6 million, compared to December 31, 2003. During the second quarter of 2003, we introduced a repurchase agreement program for those commercial customers that leave larger balances in their demand deposit accounts, allowing them to earn 0.75% on balances deposited in this program. Repurchase agreements at December 31, 2004 were $30.4 million compared to $25.5 million at December 31, 2003.
The primary reason for the increase in other borrowed funds at December 31, 2004 were advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. Due to interest rates on these advances being at their lowest levels in several years, we borrowed $47.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2003. We further utilized the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta during 2004 and ended that year with $137.0 million of advances that had a composite rate of 2.68%. Advances taken during 2004 were utilized primarily to leverage some of our larger commercial real estate fundings and to assist in financing the George Mason inventory of loans held-for-sale. In addition, included in other borrowed funds at December 31, 2004, was $20.6 million payable to Cardinal Statutory Trust I, the issuer of our trust preferred securities. This debt had an interest rate of 4.89% at December 31, 2004. In accordance
48
with FIN 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, Cardinal Statutory Trust I is an unconsolidated entity as we are not the primary beneficiary of the trust. At December 31, 2004, other borrowed funds also included $7.0 million of federal funds purchased and $6.2 million borrowed under the Federal Reserve TT&L note option.
The following table reflects the short-term FHLB advances outstanding as of December 31, 2004.
Short-Term Borrowings and Other Borrowed Funds
At December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
Advance Date |
Original Term of Advance |
Date Amount Due |
Interest Rate |
Outstanding |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan-04 | 12 months | Jan-05 | 1.56 | % | $ | 5,000 | |||
Jan-04 | 18 months | Jul-05 | 1.83 | 5,000 | |||||
Mar-03 | 24 months | Mar-05 | 1.82 | 1,000 | |||||
Jul-04 | 12 months | Jul-05 | 2.44 | 55,000 | |||||
Total short-term FHLB advances and weighted average rate | 2.32 | % | $ | 66,000 | |||||
All other borrowed funds |
2.18 |
% |
$ |
135,085 |
|||||
Total other borrowed funds | 2.23 | % | $ | 201,085 | |||||
Total deposits at December 31, 2003 were $474.1 million compared to $423.5 million at December 31, 2002, an increase of $50.7 million, or 12.0%. Other borrowed funds increased $72.5 million to $74.5 million at December 31, 2003, compared to $2.0 million at December 31, 2002.
The following table reflects the maturities of the certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.
Certificates of Deposit of $100,000 or More
At December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maturities: | |||||||||
Three months or less | $ | 7,283 | $ | 19,467 | $ | 10,759 | |||
Over three months through six months | 8,373 | 11,463 | 8,716 | ||||||
Over six months through twelve months | 34,150 | 38,107 | 15,523 | ||||||
Over twelve months | 175,496 | 34,563 | 45,214 | ||||||
$ | 225,302 | $ | 103,600 | $ | 80,212 | ||||
49
Business Segment Operations
We provide banking and non-banking financial services and products through our subsidiaries. Prior to July 7, 2004, we operated and reported in two business segments, commercial banking and investment services. As of July 7, 2004, we began operating in a third business segment, mortgage banking, with the completion of our acquisition of George Mason. The commercial banking segment includes both commercial and consumer lending and provides customers such products as commercial loans, real estate loans, and other business financing and consumer loans. In addition, this segment also provides customers with several choices of deposit products including demand deposit accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit. The mortgage banking segment engages primarily in the origination and acquisition of residential mortgages for sale into the secondary market on a best efforts basis. The investment services segment provides advisory services to businesses and individuals, including financial planning and retirement/estate planning.
Information about the reportable segments, and reconciliation of this information to the consolidated financial statements at and for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004 follows.
At and for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Commercial Banking |
Mortgage Banking |
Investment Services |
Intersegment Elimination |
Other |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net interest income | $ | 6,742 | $ | 1,311 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (231 | ) | $ | 7,822 | |||||
Provision for loan losses | 549 | — | — | — | — | 549 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest income | 374 | 4,642 | 159 | — | 8 | 5,183 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest expense | 5,593 | 3,952 | 221 | — | 329 | 10,095 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 379 | 579 | (21 | ) | — | (188 | ) | 749 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 595 | $ | 1,422 | $ | (41 | ) | $ | — | $ | (364 | ) | $ | 1,612 | ||||
Total assets | $ | 1,192,690 | $ | 379,403 | $ | 691 | $ | (411,226 | ) | $ | 116,798 | $ | 1,278,356 |
At and for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Commercial Banking |
Mortgage Banking |
Investment Services |
Intersegment Elimination |
Other |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net interest income | $ | 4,800 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 33 | $ | 4,833 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | 74 | — | — | — | — | 74 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest income | 699 | — | 178 | — | — | 877 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest expense | 4,050 | — | 239 | — | 266 | 4,555 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 462 | — | (21 | ) | — | (79 | ) | 362 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 913 | $ | — | $ | (40 | ) | $ | — | $ | (154 | ) | $ | 719 | ||||
Total assets | $ | 687,543 | $ | — | $ | 741 | $ | (88,338 | ) | $ | 93,505 | $ | 693,451 |
50
Information about the reportable segments, and reconciliation of this information to the consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 follows.
At and for the Year Ended December 31, 2004:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Commercial Banking |
Mortgage Banking |
Investment Services |
Intersegment Elimination |
Other |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net interest income | $ | 21,753 | $ | 3,057 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (257 | ) | $ | 24,553 | |||||
Provision for loan losses | 1,626 | — | — | — | — | 1,626 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest income | 1,804 | 6,953 | 645 | — | 7 | 9,409 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest expense | 17,065 | 7,889 | 800 | — | 1,400 | 27,154 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 1,628 | 698 | (52 | ) | — | (561 | ) | 1,713 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 3,238 | $ | 1,423 | $ | (103 | ) | $ | — | $ | (1,089 | ) | $ | 3,469 | ||||
Total assets | $ | 1,123,868 | $ | 392,241 | $ | 685 | $ | (421,203 | ) | $ | 115,985 | $ | 1,211,576 |
At and for the Year Ended December 31, 2003:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Commercial Banking |
Investment Services |
Intersegment Elimination |
Other |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net interest income | $ | 15,077 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 96 | $ | 15,173 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | 1,001 | — | — | — | 1,001 | |||||||||||
Non-interest income | 2,954 | 843 | — | 32 | 3,829 | |||||||||||
Non-interest expense | 13,265 | 820 | — | 1,270 | 15,355 | |||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | (464 | ) | (443 | ) | — | (2,601 | ) | (3,508 | ) | |||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 4,229 | $ | 466 | $ | — | $ | 1,459 | $ | 6,154 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 630,415 | $ | 776 | $ | (80,903 | ) | $ | 85,960 | $ | 636,248 |
At and for the Year Ended December 31, 2002:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Commercial Banking |
Investment Services |
Intersegment Elimination |
Other |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net interest income | $ | 10,575 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 81 | $ | 10,656 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | 444 | — | — | — | 444 | |||||||||||
Non-interest income | 1,848 | 942 | — | 74 | 2,864 | |||||||||||
Non-interest expense | 11,995 | 1,147 | — | 463 | 13,605 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (16 | ) | $ | (205 | ) | $ | — | $ | (308 | ) | $ | (529 | ) | ||
Total assets | $ | 483,135 | $ | 274 | $ | (38,245 | ) | $ | 41,159 | $ | 486,323 |
51
Capital Resources
Capital adequacy is an important measure of financial stability and performance. Our objectives are to maintain a level of capitalization that is sufficient to sustain asset growth and promote depositor and investor confidence.
Regulatory agencies measure capital adequacy utilizing a formula that takes into account the individual risk profile of a financial institution. The guidelines define capital as both Tier 1 (primarily common shareholders' equity, defined to include certain debt obligations) and Tier 2 (to include certain other debt obligations and a portion of the allowance for loan losses and 45% of unrealized gains in equity securities).
Shareholders' equity at March 31, 2005 was $95.7 million, an increase of $625,000, or 0.7%, compared to $95.1 million at December 31, 2004. The increase of $625,000 from the prior year end was primarily driven by net income of $1.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 offset by an unfavorable market value adjustment of $1.4 million on investment securities available-for-sale as of March 31, 2005. Book value per share at March 31, 2005 was $5.17, compared to $5.15 at December 31, 2004. Tangible book value per share at March 31, 2005 was $4.38 compared to $4.36 at December 31, 2004. At March 31, 2005, our Tier 1 and total (Tier 1 and Tier 2) risk-based capital ratios were 12.06% and 12.83%, respectively. At December 31, 2004, our Tier 1 and total risk-based capital ratios were 12.65% and 13.40%, respectively. Our regulatory capital levels for the Bank and bank holding company meet those established for well-capitalized institutions. The following table provides additional information pertaining to our capital ratios at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
Capital Components
At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Actual |
For Capital Adequacy Purposes |
To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Amount |
Ratio |
Amount |
|
Ratio |
Amount |
|
Ratio |
||||||||||||
At March 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total risk based capital/Total capital to risk-weighted assets | $ | 110,157 | 12.83 | % | $ | 68,711 | ³ | 8.00 | % | $ | 85,888 | ³ | 10.00 | % | ||||||
Tier 1 capital/Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | 103,613 | 12.06 | 34,355 | ³ | 4.00 | 51,533 | ³ | 6.00 | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital/Tier 1 to average assets | 103,613 | 9.23 | 44,890 | ³ | 4.00 | 56,113 | ³ | 5.00 | ||||||||||||
At December 31, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total risk based capital/Total capital to risk-weighted assets | $ | 107,660 | 13.40 | % | $ | 64,294 | ³ | 8.00 | % | $ | 80,368 | ³ | 10.00 | % | ||||||
Tier 1 capital/Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | 101,670 | 12.65 | 32,147 | ³ | 4.00 | 48,221 | ³ | 6.00 | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital/Tier 1 to average assets | 101,670 | 8.83 | 46,075 | ³ | 4.00 | 57,594 | ³ | 5.00 |
Shareholders' equity at December 31, 2004 was $95.1 million, an increase of $9.7 million, compared to $85.4 million at December 31, 2003. The increase in shareholders' equity was primarily attributable to $6.3 million of additional equity raised as a result of the underwriters exercising in January 2004 their over-allotment option in connection with our 2003 stock offering and net income of $3.5 million. Total shareholders' equity to total assets at December 31, 2004 and 2003 were 7.9% and 13.4%, respectively. Book value per share at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $5.15 and $4.80, respectively. Total risk based capital to risk weighted assets was 13.40% at December 31, 2004
52
compared to 20.66% at December 31, 2003. Accordingly, the Company was considered "well capitalized" for regulatory purposes at December 31, 2004. Risk based capital to risk weighted assets declined from 2003 to 2004 despite our issuance of $20.0 million of trust preferred securities, which is included as a component of regulatory capital, because of our growth during 2004 and the fact that goodwill and intangibles, which increased by $14.7 million as a result of the George Mason acquisition, are excluded from regulatory capital.
At December 31, 2003, shareholders' equity was $85.4 million compared to $40.7 million at December 31, 2002, an increase of $44.7 million. This increase in shareholders' equity was primarily driven by our completion of a secondary common stock offering that raised $41.7 million of equity capital in December 2003. In addition, we recorded net income to common shareholders of $5.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. These increases were offset by an unfavorable mark-to-market adjustment of $2.9 million in our investment securities available-for-sale portfolio. Book value per common share at December 31, 2003 was $4.80, compared to $3.37 at December 31, 2002. Tangible book value per common share at December 31, 2003 was $4.80, compared to $3.31 at December 31, 2002. At December 31, 2003, our tier 1 and total risk-based capital ratios were 19.66% and 20.66%, respectively. At December 31, 2002, our tier 1 and total risk-based capital ratios were 12.25% and 13.35%, respectively. Our regulatory capital levels for the bank and bank holding company exceeded the minimum ratios established for well-capitalized institutions.
Our regulatory capital levels for the bank and bank holding company meet those established for well-capitalized institutions. While we are currently considered well-capitalized, we may from time-to-time find it necessary to access the capital markets to meet our growth objectives or capitalize on specific business opportunities.
The following table shows the minimum capital requirement and our capital position at December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 for the consolidated bank holding company.
Capital Components
At December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Actual |
For Capital Adequacy Purposes |
To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Amount |
Ratio |
Amount |
|
Ratio |
Amount |
|
Ratio |
||||||||||||
At December 31, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total risk based capital/ Total capital to risk-weighted assets | $ | 107,660 | 13.40 | % | $ | 64,294 | ³ | 8.00 | % | $ | 80,368 | ³ | 10.00 | % | ||||||
Tier 1 capital/ Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | 101,670 | 12.65 | 32,147 | ³ | 4.00 | 48,221 | ³ | 6.00 | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital/ Tier 1 capital to average assets | 101,670 | 8.83 | 46,075 | ³ | 4.00 | 57,594 | ³ | 5.00 | ||||||||||||
At December 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total risk based capital/ Total capital to risk-weighted assets | $ | 90,239 | 20.66 | % | $ | 34,951 | ³ | 8.00 | % | $ | 43,688 | ³ | 10.00 | % | ||||||
Tier 1 capital/ Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | 85,896 | 19.66 | 17,475 | ³ | 4.00 | 26,213 | ³ | 6.00 | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital/ Tier 1 capital to average assets | 85,896 | 15.45 | 23,365 | ³ | 4.00 | 29,206 | ³ | 5.00 | ||||||||||||
At December 31, 2002 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total risk based capital/ Total capital to risk-weighted assets | $ | 41,093 | 13.35 | % | $ | 24,625 | ³ | 8.00 | % | $ | 30,781 | ³ | 10.00 | % | ||||||
Tier 1 capital/ Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | 37,721 | 12.25 | 12,313 | ³ | 4.00 | 18,469 | ³ | 6.00 | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital/ Tier 1 capital to average assets | 37,721 | 8.97 | 18,330 | ³ | 4.00 | 15,391 | ³ | 5.00 |
53
Liquidity
Liquidity in the banking industry is defined as the ability to meet the demand for funds of both depositors and borrowers. We must be able to meet these needs with cash on hand by obtaining funding from depositors or other lenders or by converting non-cash items to cash. The objective of our liquidity management program is to ensure that we always have sufficient liquid resources to meet the demands of our depositors and borrowers. Stable core deposits and a strong capital position provide the base for our liquidity position. In addition, we have demonstrated our ability to attract retail deposits because of our convenient branch locations, personal service and pricing.
In addition to retail deposits, we have access to the different wholesale funding markets. These markets include the brokered CD market, the repurchase agreement market and the federal funds market. In addition, we maintain secured lines of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. Having diverse funding alternatives reduces our reliance on any one source for funding.
Cash flow from amortizing assets or maturing assets can also provide funding to meet the needs of depositors and borrowers.
We have established a formal liquidity contingency plan which establishes a liquidity management team and provides guidelines for liquidity management. For our liquidity management program, we first determine our current liquidity position. Liquidity is then forecasted based on forecasted changes in the balance sheet for both earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. The bank expects to maintain a certain liquidity cushion throughout the forecast period. In addition to the forecast, we also stress test our liquidity position under several different stress scenarios. Guidelines for the forecasted liquidity cushion and for liquidity cushions for each stress scenario have been established. In addition, one stress test combines all other stress tests to see how liquidity would react to several negative scenarios occurring at the same time. We believe that we have sufficient resources to meet our liquidity needs.
In September 2004, George Mason and Bank entered into a one year $150 million floating rate revolving credit and security agreement with a third party. The purpose of this credit facility is to fund residential mortgage loans at George Mason prior to their sale into the secondary market. The credit facility requires, among other things, that George Mason and the Bank have positive quarterly net income and maintain specified minimum tangible and regulatory net worth requirements. The Company has guaranteed repayment of this debt. The interest rate on this credit facility is LIBOR plus between 1.50% and 1.875%. At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, $0 of this line was utilized.
In addition to this facility, this same lender has also provided a $100 million facility that is utilized by George Mason to warehouse residential mortgage loans held for sale to this lender. The terms of this facility are substantially the same as the above-referenced revolving credit and security agreement and the cost of this facility is netted against interest earned on the loans pending settlement with the lender. At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, $0 of this line was utilized.
George Mason had a $60.0 million line of credit with an unaffiliated party, which it used to warehouse loans pending sale. This line matured on March 1, 2005 and had an interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.50%. At December 31, 2004, $30.2 million of this line was utilized and the rate was 3.89%.
Liquid assets, which include cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and investment securities available for sale totaled $197.0 million at March 31, 2005 or 15.4% of total assets. We held investments that are classified as held-to-maturity in the amount of $133.4 million at March 31, 2005. To maintain ready access to the bank's secured lines of credit, the bank has pledged the majority of its securities to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta with additional securities pledged to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. Additional borrowing capacity at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta at March 31, 2005 was approximately $146.0 million. Borrowing capacity with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond was approximately $43.5 million at March 31, 2005.
54
At December 31, 2004, liquid assets totaled $175.0 million or 14.4% of total assets. We held investments that are classified as held-to-maturity in the amount of $138.0 million at December 31, 2004. Additional borrowing capacity at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta at December 31, 2004 was approximately $117 million. Borrowing capacity with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond was approximately $46.5 million at December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2004 George Mason had $310 million of lines of credit available to it. We are committed to maintaining liquidity at a level sufficient to protect depositors, provide for reasonable growth and fully comply with all regulatory requirements.
Contractual Obligations
We have entered into a number of long-term contractual obligations to support our ongoing activities. These contractual obligations will be funded through operating revenues and liquidity sources held or available to us. The required payments under such obligations at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 were as follows:
Contractual Obligations
At March 31, 2005
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Payments Due by Period |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Total |
Less than 1 Year |
1 – 2 Years |
3 – 5 Years |
More than 5 Years |
||||||||||
Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more | $ | 225,351 | $ | 62,125 | $ | 19,087 | $ | 142,752 | $ | 1,387 | |||||
Brokered certificates of deposit | 66,678 | 64,826 | 1,852 | — | — | ||||||||||
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta | 100,333 | 31,000 | 9,250 | 40,083 | 20,000 | ||||||||||
Trust preferred securities | 20,000 | — | — | — | 20,000 | ||||||||||
Operating lease obligations | 15,293 | 3,918 | 3,886 | 6,221 | 1,268 | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 427,655 | $ | 161,869 | $ | 34,075 | $ | 189,056 | $ | 42,655 | |||||
Contractual Obligations
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Payments Due by Period |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Total |
Less than 1 Year |
1 – 3 Years |
3 – 5 Years |
More than 5 Years |
||||||||||
Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more | $ | 225,302 | $ | 49,806 | $ | 9,939 | $ | 164,874 | $ | 683 | |||||
Brokered certificates of deposits | 86,708 | 84,858 | 1,850 | — | — | ||||||||||
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta | 136,958 | 66,000 | 9,250 | 41,708 | 20,000 | ||||||||||
Trust preferred securities | 20,000 | — | — | — | 20,000 | ||||||||||
Operating lease obligations | 16,256 | 3,888 | 3,889 | 7,013 | 1,466 | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 485,224 | $ | 204,552 | $ | 24,928 | $ | 213,595 | $ | 42,149 | |||||
In addition to the above contractual obligations, at March 31, 2005 we had commitments to extend credit of $371.6 million and standby letters of credit of $4.8 million. At December 31, 2004 we had issued $324.8 million of loan funding commitments and were contingently liable for $5.2 million in standby letters of credit. These amounts are not reflected in the consolidated statements of condition. We use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance-sheet instruments.
55
Quarterly Data
The following table provides quarterly data for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. Quarterly per share results may not calculate to the year-end per share results due to rounding.
Quarterly Data
Years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
2004 |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Fourth Quarter |
Third Quarter |
Second Quarter |
First Quarter |
|||||||||
Interest income | $ | 12,952 | $ | 12,189 | $ | 7,967 | $ | 7,414 | |||||
Interest expense | 5,424 | 4,995 | 2,969 | 2,581 | |||||||||
Net interest income | 7,528 | 7,194 | 4,998 | 4,833 | |||||||||
Provision for loan losses | (709 | ) | (529 | ) | (314 | ) | (74 | ) | |||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 6,819 | 6,665 | 4,684 | 4,759 | |||||||||
Non-interest income | 5,097 | 2,784 | 564 | 964 | |||||||||
Non-interest expense | 9,321 | 8,893 | 4,298 | 4,642 | |||||||||
Net income before income taxes | 2,595 | 556 | 950 | 1,081 | |||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 863 | 172 | 316 | 362 | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,732 | $ | 384 | $ | 634 | $ | 719 | |||||
Dividends to preferred shareholders | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Net income to common shareholders | $ | 1,732 | $ | 384 | $ | 634 | $ | 719 | |||||
Earnings per common share, basic | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.04 | |||||
Earnings per common share, diluted | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.04 | |||||
2003 |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Fourth Quarter |
Third Quarter |
Second Quarter |
First Quarter |
|||||||||
Interest income | $ | 6,864 | $ | 6,179 | $ | 5,787 | $ | 5,772 | |||||
Interest expense | 2,432 | 2,341 | 2,343 | 2,313 | |||||||||
Net interest income | 4,432 | 3,838 | 3,444 | 3,459 | |||||||||
Provision for loan losses | (399 | ) | (356 | ) | (166 | ) | (80 | ) | |||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 4,033 | 3,482 | 3,278 | 3,379 | |||||||||
Non-interest income | 833 | 971 | 1,049 | 976 | |||||||||
Non-interest expense | 4,148 | 3,684 | 3,658 | 3,865 | |||||||||
Net income before income taxes | 718 | 769 | 669 | 490 | |||||||||
Income tax benefit | (3,508 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 4,226 | $ | 769 | $ | 669 | $ | 490 | |||||
Dividends to preferred shareholders | 123 | 124 | 124 | 124 | |||||||||
Net income to common shareholders | $ | 4,103 | $ | 645 | $ | 545 | $ | 366 | |||||
Earnings per common share, basic | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.04 | |||||
Earnings per common share, diluted | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.04 | |||||
56
Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods required by the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, without limitation, those controls and procedures designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
At December 31, 2004, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer. Based on and as of the date of such evaluation, these officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to corrections or errors related to our accounting adjustments applied to the acquisition of George Mason in a cash transaction for $17.0 million on July 7, 2004, as described below. These officers believe that the corrections have been handled as contemplated by the requirement for disclosure controls and procedures under the Exchange Act.
As of March 31, 2005, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer. Based on and as of the date of such evaluation, these officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and identified the material weakness described below, which resulted in material misstatements that caused us to restate our consolidated financial statements included on our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as of and for the periods ended September 30, 2004. Subsequent to the initial filing of the aforementioned Form 10-Q, we identified these errors related to our accounting for the acquisition of George Mason. The errors were related to the fair value estimates associated with acquired loans held for sale and the acquired pipeline of unfunded loan commitments and various other adjustments primarily related to the George Mason acquisition. These material misstatements resulted in the overstatement of goodwill and the allowance for loan losses; the understatement of loans held for sale, net, loans receivable, net, accrued interest receivable and other assets, and accrued interest payable and other liabilities; and an overstatement of net income as of and for the periods ended September 30, 2004.
During the evaluation of these accounting errors, we concluded that they were the result of a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting with respect to the accounting for non-routine transactions. A material weakness is a significant deficiency (as defined in the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board's Auditing Standard No. 2), or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in there being more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement in the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by
57
employees in the normal course of their work. Specifically, our accounting personnel lacked sufficient resources and expertise to properly account for certain non-routine transactions; our policies and procedures did not provide for timely review of significant non-routine transactions and related accounting entries; and we did not maintain sufficient documentation related to the application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles to significant non-routine transactions.
In making the assessment set forth above, as of December 31, 2004, our management used the criteria established in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The scope of management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, however, did not include an assessment of the internal control over financial reporting at George Mason, which we acquired on July 7, 2004. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we had $5.2 million in income before income taxes, of which George Mason accounted for $2.1 million, and $3.5 million in net income, of which George Mason accounted for $1.4 million. In addition, at December 31, 2004, we had $1.21 billion in total assets, of which George Mason accounted for $392.2 million.
Because of the material weakness described above, management believes that, as of December 31, 2004, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective based on the aforementioned criteria.
Our independent registered public accountants have issued an audit report on our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. That report can be found on page 59 below.
Remediation Steps to Address Material Weakness
As a result of these corrections, we restated certain financial statements included in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004. The corrections occurred as a result of the miscalculations of accounting entries and misapplication of certain financial accounting standards and did not result from any fraudulent activities. The corrections related to purchase accounting were nonrecurring and noncash in nature. We appointed a new chief financial officer and hired a new senior accountant in October 2004. We believe these appointments have strengthened the internal control structure of the organization. During the first quarter of 2005, we implemented timely review and sign-off procedures that include the utilization of a disclosure checklist. Finally, we implemented procedures to ensure that we document the application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles to significant non-routine transaction. We believe that we have taken the necessary corrective actions to eliminate the material weakness.
Except as described above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with our evaluation of it that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
58
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cardinal Financial Corporation and subsidiaries:
We have audited management's assessment, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Cardinal Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, because of the effect of the material weakness identified in management's assessment with respect to the accounting for non-routine transactions, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management's assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The following material weakness has been identified and included in management's assessment: As of December 31, 2004, the Company's accounting personnel lacked sufficient resources and expertise to properly account for certain non-routine transactions; the Company's policies and procedures did not provide for timely review of significant non-routine transactions and related accounting entries; and the Company did not maintain sufficient documentation related to the application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles to significant non-routine transactions. As a result of this material weakness in internal control over financial reporting, Cardinal Financial Corporation and subsidiaries' consolidated financial statements were materially misstated as of and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004, due to the Company's incorrect accounting for certain non-routine transactions. These material misstatements resulted in the overstatement of goodwill and the allowance for loan losses, and the
59
understatement of loans held for sale, net, loans receivable, net, accrued interest receivable and other assets, and accrued interest payable and other liabilities, and an overstatement of net income as of and for the period ended September 30, 2004.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of condition of the Company as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004. The aforementioned material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2004 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 11, 2005, which expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
The Company acquired George Mason Mortgage, LLC (GMM) during 2004, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, GMM's internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of $392.2 million and pre-tax income of $2.1 million included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of George Mason Mortgage, LLC.
/s/ KPMG LLP
McLean,
Virginia
March 11, 2005
60
Overview
We are a financial holding company formed in 1997 and headquartered in Tysons Corner, Virginia. We were formed principally in response to opportunities resulting from the consolidation of several Virginia based banks. These bank consolidations had been typically accompanied by the dissolution of local boards of directors and relocation or termination of management and customer service professionals and a general deterioration of personalized customer service.
We own Cardinal Bank, a Virginia state-chartered bank with 19 branches located in northern Virginia and the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. We offer a wide range of traditional banking products and services to both commercial and retail customers in our market areas. We focus on attracting small and medium-sized businesses as well as commercial real estate developers and builders in addition to professionals, such as physicians, accountants and attorneys.
On July 7, 2004, Cardinal Bank purchased George Mason Mortgage, LLC for $17.0 million in cash. George Mason allows us to offer a broad array of mortgage loan products to our customers seeking to purchase a home or refinance a mortgage. George Mason also provides certain mortgage banking services to large local home builders. Headquartered in Fairfax, Virginia, George Mason currently has eight branches located throughout the metropolitan Washington, D.C. region and conducts business in eight states and the District of Columbia. George Mason is one of the largest residential mortgage originators in the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, originating and funding of over $3.5 billion of residential mortgage loans in 2004.
We also own Cardinal Wealth Services, Inc., which further complements our core banking operations by offering a full range of investment products and services, including estate planning, qualified retirement plans, mutual funds, annuities, life insurance, fixed income and equity securities and equity research, to our customers through our third-party relationship with Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.
On April 29, 2005, we signed a definitive agreement to acquire Wilson/Bennett Capital Management, Inc., an asset management firm based in Alexandria, Virginia. John W. Fisher, a member of our Board of Directors, is the founder and President and Chief Investment Officer of Wilson/Bennett and owns 90% of the firm. Under the terms of the agreement, we plan to acquire Wilson/Bennett for approximately $6.6 million in a combination of common stock and cash. The cash portion of the transaction will be approximately $1.1 million.
The closing of the transaction is subject to all necessary regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions. In addition, the closing of the transaction is also subject to the conditions that clients of Wilson/Bennett representing at least 75% of the assets under management have consented to the transaction, that we enter into an employment agreement with Mr. Fisher and that Wilson/Bennett obtain, at our expense, a term life insurance policy on the life of Mr. Fisher in an amount of no less than $3,000,000. We will be the beneficiary under that policy. We expect that, if the conditions are satisfied, the transaction will close early in the third quarter of 2005. At that time, Wilson/Bennett will become a subsidiary of Cardinal Financial Corporation. Additional information on this transaction is included in "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" on page 78.
We believe that this acquisition advances our strategy of enhancing fee income and further diversifying our revenue stream. Wilson/Bennett has approximately 500 institutional and personal clients and approximately $227 million of assets under management. Wilson/Bennett utilizes a value-oriented investment approach that focuses on large capitalization stocks. Wilson/Bennett's 2004 revenues were approximately $1.4 million. We anticipate that the acquisition of Wilson/Bennett will not have a material impact on our 2005 earnings.
61
History
Cardinal Financial Corporation was formed in late 1997. We organized Cardinal Bank, N.A. as a wholly owned subsidiary that commenced operations as a nationally chartered community bank on June 8, 1998. Subsequently, we organized two additional wholly-owned bank subsidiaries: Cardinal Bank—Manassas/Prince William, N.A., headquartered in Manassas, Virginia, that commenced operations on July 26, 1999; and Cardinal Bank—Dulles, N.A., headquartered in Reston, Virginia, that commenced operations on August 2, 1999. In addition to the banks that we organized de novo, in September 2000, we acquired The Heritage Bank through a merger with Heritage Bancorp, Inc. The Heritage Bank was renamed Cardinal Bank—Potomac as a result of the merger. Effective March 1, 2002, we reorganized these four banking subsidiaries into a single bank, Cardinal Bank, N.A. In December 2004, Cardinal Bank, N.A. converted to a state-chartered bank and changed its name to Cardinal Bank.
George Mason was incorporated in Virginia in 1990 as a subsidiary of George Mason Bank. Bernard H. Clineburg, then president of George Mason Bank, hired D. Gene Merrill in 1993. Mr. Merrill remains George Mason's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. In 1998, George Mason Bank, including its mortgage subsidiary, was sold to United Bankshares, Inc. When we acquired George Mason from United Bankshares, Inc., the senior management was substantially the same as that with which Mr. Clineburg had previously worked.
Growth Strategy
We believe that both the strong demographic characteristics of our markets and the ongoing bank consolidation within the greater Washington, D.C. and Northern Virginia metropolitan areas provide a significant opportunity to continue building a successful community-focused banking franchise. We intend to continue to expand our business through internal growth as well as selective geographic expansion while maintaining strong asset quality and achieving sustained profitability. Our strategy for achieving these objectives includes the following:
Continue to expand our branch network. We intend to continue to expand our footprint by establishing new branches and potentially acquiring existing branches or other financial institutions in communities that present attractive growth opportunities within Northern Virginia and other markets in the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. During the 12 months ended March 31, 2005, we opened seven branch banking facilities, including our 19th branch which is located in Sterling, Virginia in January 2005. We have also submitted applications to banking regulators to open three additional branch banking offices, including one in the District of Columbia. Our current plans, which are subject to change, contemplate that we will add as many as five new branches by the end of 2005.
As a result of the recent consolidation of banks in our market, we expect to continue to have opportunities to acquire or lease former branch sites from other financial institutions. As we have done in the past, we may acquire additional sites prior to planned branch openings when we believe the sites are attractive and are available on favorable terms. At the present time, we have a first right of refusal that gives us the option to purchase two branch facilities if the financial institution now operating these locations chooses to close or move its operations anytime before January 2010. We are also currently in negotiations to purchase or lease additional branch sites located in Northern Virginia, although there can be no assurance that we will be successful in acquiring any of them. We have purchased real estate in Woodbridge where, upon obtaining regulatory approval, we will construct a new branch. Because the opening of each new branch increases our operating expenses, we intend to stage new branch openings in an effort to take into account the impact of these expenses on our results of operations.
Further capitalize on the continued bank consolidation in our market. Recently announced or completed mergers of larger regional and national banks will result in further consolidation in our target market. We intend to continue to capitalize on the dislocation of customers resulting from this
62
continuing bank consolidation who are seeking more personalized service from a local institution. We believe this consolidation creates opportunities for us to further expand our branch network to attractive retail sites, as discussed above, as well as to increase our market share of bank deposits within our target market. As a local banking organization, we believe we can compete effectively by providing a high level of personalized service in a retail-oriented branch system.
Although we are not at this time engaged in negotiations with any specific bank acquisition targets, we will continue to explore the possibility of further growth through acquisition in Virginia and the metropolitan Washington, D.C. market.
Expand our lending activities. We have substantially increased our legal lending limit to $14.3 million as of March 31, 2005 as a result of retained earnings as well as the completion of our secondary common stock offering in December 2003. This has allowed us to further expand our commercial and real estate lending activities and improved our ability to serve larger residential homebuilders and government contractors in the greater Washington, D.C. area. Government procurement in the greater Washington region exceeded $42 billion in 2003, and we believe there are unique growth opportunities in this sector of our regional economy. Our goal is to aggressively grow our loan portfolio while maintaining superior asset quality through conservative underwriting practices. During significant periods of growth in our loan portfolio, our earnings could be impacted by additional provisions to our allowance for loan losses to reflect the resultant increase in loan balances.
Continue to recruit experienced bankers. We have been successful in recruiting senior bankers with experience in and knowledge of our markets who have been displaced or have grown dissatisfied as a result of the bank consolidation in our market. We intend to continue our efforts to recruit experienced bankers, particularly experienced lenders within our market who can have an immediate impact on generating additional loan volume through existing relationships.
Focus on specialized lending services. We plan to continue to expand certain existing product lines that we believe provide unique opportunities for growth in our market, including government contract lending, SBA guaranteed lending, and retail lending. Our goal is to create a diversified, community-focused banking franchise, balanced between retail, commercial and real estate transactions and services.
Capitalize on cross-selling opportunities. We intend to further penetrate our expanding customer base through enhanced cross-selling initiatives and by offering additional financial products and services. The addition of George Mason allows us to offer our existing customer base a broader array of mortgage loan products. In addition, we will aggressively market our traditional banking and wealth management products to George Mason's customers. Our focus at George Mason is to build and maintain relationships with local and national homebuilders in an attempt to both reduce this business' reliance on the cyclical mortgage refinancing market and increase our commercial real estate lending activities. We also plan to further develop and expand the investment services we offer through our wealth management subsidiary. We believe we will better serve our growing customer base by expanding our current products and services and delivering personalized customer service.
Market Area
We consider our target market to be the greater Washington metropolitan area, which includes the District of Columbia, the Northern Virginia counties of Arlington, Fairfax, Fauquier, Loudoun, Prince William, Spotsylvania and Stafford, the Northern Virginia cities of Alexandria, Fairfax, Falls Church, Fredericksburg, and Manassas, and the Maryland counties of Frederick, Montgomery and Prince Georges.
According to 2000 U.S. census data, the population of the greater Washington metropolitan area was approximately 4.7 million people. The average of the median family income figures reported in the
63
2000 U.S. census for our target market was approximately $64,000, compared to a national median household income of approximately $42,000. Based on estimates released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor for December 2004, the unemployment rate for the greater Washington metropolitan area was approximately 3.2%, compared to a national unemployment rate of 5.4%. According to 2000 U.S. census figures, approximately 44% of adults at least 25 years old in this area have a bachelor's degree or higher, compared to approximately 24% nationally. As of June 30, 2004, total deposits in this area were approximately $120 billion as reported by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC").
Our headquarters is located approximately seven miles west of Washington, D.C. in Fairfax County, Virginia. The 2000 U.S. census data indicates that Fairfax County is the most populous county in Virginia with a population of approximately one million people and a median household income of over $81,000. Based on estimates released by the Bureau of Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor for December 2004, the unemployment rate in Fairfax County was 1.8%. The 2000 U.S. census data shows that over 54% of Fairfax County adults at least 25 years old have a bachelor's degree or higher.
Competition
The greater Washington region is dominated by branches of large regional or national banks headquartered outside of the region. Our market area is a highly competitive, highly branched banking market. We compete as a financial intermediary with other commercial banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market mutual funds and other types of financial institutions. George Mason faces significant competition from both traditional financial institutions and other national and local mortgage banking companies.
Competition for deposits and in providing lending and mortgage banking products and services to small businesses and professionals in the market area is intense, and pricing is important. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources and lending limits than we do. In addition, many competitors offer more extensive branch networks than we currently have. Moreover, larger institutions operating in the greater Washington market have access to borrowed funds at lower costs than are available to us. However, we have succeeded in competing in this environment due to an emphasis on a high level of personalized customer service, localized and more responsive decision making, and community involvement.
With over 1,500 bank branches in the greater Washington region, deposit competition among institutions in the market area is also very strong. However, of the $120 billion in bank deposits in the greater Washington region at June 30, 2004, approximately 75% were held by banks that are either based outside of the greater Washington region or are operating wholesale banks drawing deposits nationally (E*TRADE Bank, Capital One Bank and Treasury Bank). In just over six years, we have grown to the seventh largest financial institution headquartered in the greater Washington region measured by total deposits. By providing competitive products and more personalized service, and being actively involved in our local communities, we believe we can continue to increase our share of this banking deposit market.
Customers
We believe that the recent and ongoing bank consolidation within Northern Virginia and the greater Washington region provides a significant opportunity to build a successful, locally-oriented banking franchise. We also believe that many of the larger financial institutions in our area do not emphasize a high level of personalized service to small and medium-sized commercial businesses and professional or individual retail customers. Our commercial relationship managers focus their marketing efforts on attracting small and medium-sized businesses as well as commercial real estate developers and builders and professionals, such as physicians, accountants and attorneys.
64
Although we expect to continue serving the business and professional market with experienced commercial relationship managers, we have increased our retail marketing efforts through the expansion of our branch network and development of additional retail products and services. We expanded our deposit market share through aggressive marketing of our President's Club relationship product and our Totally Free Checking product. In addition, during the second quarter of 2002, we organized our retail lending group which specializes in consumer lending products, and in 2003 we established a small business lending group and a government contract lending group.
Banking Products and Services
The principal business of the bank is to accept deposits from the public and to make loans and other investments. The principal sources of funds for the bank's loans and investments are demand, time, savings and other deposits, repayment of loans, and borrowings. The principal source of income for the bank is interest collected on loans and other investments. The principal expenses of the bank are interest paid on savings and other deposits, employee compensation, office expenses, and other overhead expenses. The bank does not currently offer trust or fiduciary services.
The principal business of George Mason, the bank's mortgage banking subsidiary, is to originate residential loans for sale into the secondary market on a best efforts basis. These loans are closed and serviced by George Mason on an interim basis pending their ultimate sale to permanent investors in the secondary market. The mortgage subsidiary funds these loans through a line of credit from Cardinal Bank, lines of credit through third party lenders and cash available to George Mason through its own operations. George Mason's income on these loans is generated from the upfront fees it charges its customers, the gain it recognizes upon the sale of the loans and the interest income it earns while the loans are being serviced by the company. Costs associated with these loans are primarily comprised of salaries and commissions paid to loan originators and support personnel, interest expense incurred while the loan is being serviced by George Mason, and operational expenses associated with the origination of the loans. In addition, George Mason generates management fee income by providing specific services to other mortgage banking companies owned by local home builders.
George Mason also offers a construction-to-permanent loan program. This program provides financing for customers to construct their residence. Once the home has been completed, the loan converts to permanent financing and is sold into the secondary market. These construction-to-permanent loans generate fee income as well as net interest income for George Mason.
Both Cardinal Bank and George Mason are committed to providing high quality products and services to their customers, and have made a significant investment in core informational technology systems. These systems provide the technology that fully automates the branches, processes bank transactions, mortgage originations and tracking, other loans and electronic banking, conducts database and direct response marketing, provides cash management solutions, streamlined reporting and reconciliation support as well as sales support.
With this investment in technology, the bank offers Internet-based delivery of products for both consumers and commercial customers. Customers can open accounts, apply for loans, check balances, check account history, transfer funds, pay bills, download account transactions into Quicken™ and Microsoft Money™, use interactive calculators and correspond via e-mail with the bank over the Internet. The Internet provides an inexpensive way for the bank to expand its geographic borders and branch activities while providing the kind of services one would expect from larger banks.
We offer a broad array of products and services to our customers. A description of these products and services is set forth below.
65
Lending
We offer a full range of short- to long-term commercial, real estate and consumer lending products and services, which are described in further detail below. We have established pre-determined target ranges for the diversification of our loan portfolio. Commercial and industrial loans, real estate-commercial loans, real estate-construction loans, real estate-residential loans, home equity loans, and consumer loans account for approximately 11%, 44%, 14%, 19%, 11%, 1%, respectively of our loan portfolio at March 31, 2005. We may adjust these levels from time to time as the credit demands of the community change and as our business evolves.
Commercial and Industrial Loans. We make commercial loans to qualified businesses in our market area. Our commercial lending portfolio consists primarily of commercial and industrial loans for the financing of accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment. Our government contract lending group provides secured lending to government contract firms and businesses based primarily on receivables from the federal government. We also offer Small Business Administration ("SBA") guaranteed loans and asset-based lending arrangements to certain of our customers. In 2003, we became certified as a preferred lender by the SBA, which provides us with much more flexibility in approving loans guaranteed under the SBA's various loan guaranty programs.
Commercial and industrial loans generally have a higher degree of risk than residential mortgage loans, but have commensurately higher yields. Residential mortgage loans generally are made on the basis of the borrower's ability to repay the loan from his or her salary and other income and are secured by residential real estate, the value of which generally is readily ascertainable. In contrast, commercial loans typically are made on the basis of the borrower's ability to repay the loan from the cash flow from its business and are secured by business assets, such as commercial real estate, accounts receivable, equipment and inventory. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial loans may be substantially dependent on the success of the business itself. Further, the collateral for commercial loans may depreciate over time and generally cannot be appraised with as much precision as residential real estate.
To manage these risks, our policy is to secure the commercial loans we make with both the assets of the borrowing business and other additional collateral and guarantees that may be available. In addition, we actively monitor certain measures of the borrower, including advance rate, cash flow, collateral value and other appropriate credit factors.
Commercial Mortgage Loans. We also originate commercial mortgage loans. These loans are primarily secured by various types of commercial real estate, including office, retail, warehouse, industrial and other non-residential types of properties and are made to the owners and/or occupants of such property. The majority of these loans have maturities generally ranging from one to ten years.
Commercial mortgage lending entails significant additional risk compared with residential mortgage lending. Commercial mortgage loans typically involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Additionally, the repayment of loans secured by income-producing properties is typically dependent on the successful operation of a business or a real estate project and thus may be subject, to a greater extent than is the case with residential mortgage loans, to adverse conditions in the commercial real estate market or in the general economy. Our commercial real estate loan underwriting criteria require an examination of debt service coverage ratios, the borrower's creditworthiness and prior credit history and reputation, and we generally require personal guarantees or endorsements with respect to these loans. In the loan underwriting process, we also carefully consider the location of the property that will be collateral for the loan.
Loan-to-value ratios for commercial mortgage loans generally do not exceed 75%. We permit loan-to-value ratios of up to 80% if the property is owner occupied and the borrower has unusually strong liquidity, net worth and cash flow.
66
Residential Mortgage Loans. Residential mortgage loans are originated by both Cardinal Bank and George Mason. Our residential mortgage loans consist of residential first and second mortgage loans, residential construction loans and home equity lines of credit and term loans secured by first and second mortgages on the residences of borrowers. Second mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit are used for home improvements, education and other personal expenditures. We make mortgage loans with a variety of terms, including fixed, floating and variable interest rates and a variety of loan maturities.
Residential mortgage loans generally are made on the basis of the borrower's ability to repay the loan from his or her salary and other income and are secured by residential real estate, the value of which is generally readily ascertainable. These loans are made consistent with our appraisal and real estate lending policies, which detail maximum loan-to-value ratios and maturities. Residential mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit secured by owner-occupied property generally are made with a loan-to-value ratio of up to 80%. Loan-to-value ratios of up to 90% may be allowed on residential owner-occupied property if the borrower exhibits unusually strong liquidity, net worth and cash flow.
Construction Loans. Our construction loan portfolio consists of single-family residential properties, multi-family properties and commercial projects. Construction lending entails significant additional risks compared with residential mortgage lending. Construction loans often involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Construction loans also involve additional risks since funds are advanced while the property is under construction, which property has uncertain value prior to the completion of construction. Thus, it is more difficult to evaluate accurately the total loan funds required to complete a project and related loan-to-value ratios. To minimize the risks associated with construction lending, we limit loan-to-value ratios for owner occupied residential or commercial properties to 80%, and for investor-owned residential or commercial properties to 75% of when-completed appraised values. We expect that the loan-to-value ratios will be sufficient to compensate for fluctuations in the real estate market to minimize the risk of loss. Maturities for construction loans generally range from six to 12 months for residential property and from 12 to 24 months for non-residential and multi-family properties.
Consumer Loans. Our consumer loans consist primarily of installment loans made to individuals for personal, family and household purposes. The specific types of consumer loans we make include home improvement loans, automobile loans, debt consolidation loans and general consumer lending.
Consumer loans may entail greater risk than residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans that are unsecured, such as lines of credit, or secured by rapidly depreciable assets, such as automobiles. In such cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance as a result of the greater likelihood of damage, loss or depreciation. The remaining deficiency often does not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower. In addition, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower's continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans. A loan may also give rise to claims and defenses by a consumer loan borrower against an assignee of such loan, such as the bank, and a borrower may be able to assert against such assignee claims and defenses that it has against the seller of the underlying collateral.
Our policy for consumer loans is to accept moderate risk while minimizing losses, primarily through a careful credit and financial analysis of the borrower. In evaluating consumer loans, we require our lending officers to review the borrower's level and stability of income, past credit history, amount of debt currently outstanding and the impact of these factors on the ability of the borrower to repay the loan in a timely manner. In addition, we require our banking officers to maintain an appropriate margin between the loan amount and collateral value.
67
We also issue credit cards to certain of our customers. In determining to whom we will issue credit cards, we evaluate the borrower's level and stability of income, past credit history and other factors. Finally, we make additional loans that are not classified in one of the above categories. In making such loans, we attempt to ensure that the borrower meets our loan underwriting standards.
Loan Participations
From time to time we purchase and sell commercial loan participations to or from other banks within our market area. All loan participations purchased have been underwritten using the bank's standard and customary underwriting criteria and are in good standing.
Deposits
We offer a broad range of interest-bearing and non-interest-bearing deposit accounts, including commercial and retail checking accounts, money market accounts, individual retirement accounts, regular interest-bearing savings accounts and certificates of deposit with a range of maturity date options. The primary sources of deposits are small and medium-sized businesses and individuals within our target market. Senior management has the authority to set rates within specified parameters in order to remain competitive with other financial institutions in our market area. All deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to the maximum amount permitted by law. We have a service charge fee schedule, which is competitive with other financial institutions in our market, covering such matters as maintenance fees on checking accounts, per item processing fees on checking accounts, returned check charges and other similar fees.
Courier Services
We offer courier services to our business customers. Courier services permit us to provide the convenience and personalized service that our customers require by scheduling pick-ups of deposits and other banking transactions.
Telephone and Internet Banking
We believe that there is a strong demand within our market for telephone banking and internet banking. These services allow both commercial and retail customers to access detailed account information and execute a wide variety of the banking transactions, including balance transfers and bill payment. We believe that these services are particularly attractive to our customers, as it enables them to conduct their banking business and monitor their bank accounts from remote locations and at anytime. Telephone and internet banking assist us in attracting and retaining customers and encourages our existing customers to consider Cardinal for all of their banking and financial needs.
Automatic Teller Machines
We have an ATM at each of our branch offices and we make other financial institutions' ATMs available to our customers.
Other Products and Services
We offer other banking-related specialized products and services to our customers, such as travelers' checks and safe deposit services. We issue letters of credit and standby letters of credit for some of our commercial customers, most of which are related to real estate construction loans. Neither the Bank nor George Mason has engaged in any securitizations of loans.
68
Credit Policies
Our senior lending officers and chief credit officer are primarily responsible for maintaining both a quality loan portfolio and a strong credit culture throughout the organization. The chief credit officer is responsible for developing and updating our credit policies and procedures, which are approved by the board of directors. Senior lending officers may make exceptions to these credit policies and procedures as appropriate, but any such exception must be approved by the chief credit officer, documented and made for sound business reasons.
Credit quality is controlled by the chief credit officer through compliance with our credit policies and procedures. Our risk-decision process is actively managed in a disciplined fashion to maintain an acceptable risk profile characterized by soundness, diversity, quality, prudence, balance and accountability. Our credit approval process consists of specific authorities granted to the lending officers and combinations of loan officers. Loans exceeding a particular lending officer's level of authority, or the combined limit of several officers, are reviewed and considered for approval by an officers' loan committee and, when above a specified amount, by a committee of the bank's board of directors. All loans of $500,000 or more require committee approval. In addition, the chief credit officer works closely with each lending officer at the bank level to ensure that the business being solicited is of the quality and structure that fits our desired risk profile.
Under our credit policies, we monitor our concentration of credit risk. We have established concentration guideline limits for any individual or entity, any group of borrowers related as to the source of repayment, or any specific industry. Furthermore, the bank has established limits on the total amount of the bank's outstanding loans to one borrower, all of which are set below legal lending limits.
Loans originated and funded by George Mason are underwritten in accordance with guidelines established by the various investors to whom George Mason sells its loans in the secondary market.
Brokerage and Investment Services
We provide brokerage and investment services through an arrangement with Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. Under this arrangement, financial advisors can offer our customers an extensive range of investment products and services, including estate planning, qualified retirement plans, mutual funds, annuities, life insurance, fixed income and equity securities and equity research and recommendations.
Employees
At March 31, 2005, we had 391 full-time equivalent employees. None of our employees are represented by any collective bargaining unit. We believe our relations with our employees are good.
Properties
Cardinal Bank, excluding its George Mason subsidiary, conducts its business from 19 branch banking offices. Seven of these facilities are owned and 12 are leased. Leased branch banking facilities range in size from 1,000 square feet to 11,182 square feet. Our leases on these facilities expire at various dates through 2014, but all our leases have renewal options. Thirteen of our branch banking locations have drive-up banking capabilities and all have ATMs.
Cardinal Wealth Services, Inc. conducts its business from three of Cardinal Bank's branch facilities.
George Mason conducts its business from eight leased facilities which range in size from 1,428 square feet to 22,056 square feet. The leases have various expiration dates through 2008 and generally do not have renewal options.
Our headquarters facility in Tysons Corner, Virginia comprises 31,880 square feet of leased office space. This lease expires in January 2010 but has renewal options. In addition to housing various
69
administrative functions—including accounting, data processing, compliance, treasury, marketing, deposit and loan operations—our commercial and industrial and commercial real estate lending functions are located there.
We believe that all of our properties are maintained in good operating condition and are suitable and adequate for our operational needs.
Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of our operations, we may become party to legal proceedings. Currently, we are not party to any material proceedings and no such proceedings are, to management's knowledge, threatened against us.
70
The Board of Directors
Our board of directors currently consists of 13 members. The board of directors is divided into three classes, two of which consist of four members and one of which consists of five members. These directors serve for the terms of their respective classes, which expire in 2006, 2007 and 2008. The following table sets forth the composition of the board of directors:
Class I (Term Expiring in 2006) |
Class II (Term Expiring in 2007) |
Class III (Term Expiring in 2008) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Wayne W. Broadwater Bernard H. Clineburg James D. Russo John H. Rust George P. Shafran |
B. G. Beck Michael A. Garcia J. Hamilton Lambert Alice M. Starr |
William G. Buck Sidney O. Dewberry John W. Fisher William E. Peterson |
The following information sets forth as of May 9, 2005 the names, ages, principal occupations and business experience for all 13 directors. Unless other wise indicated, the business experience and principal occupations shown for each director has extended five or more years.
B. G. Beck, 68, has been a director since 2000. He is Vice Chairman & director of Viisage Technologies, Inc. and was President & Chief Executive Officer of Trans Digital Technologies from 1997 to 2004. Mr. Beck was President & Chief Executive Officer of Thermo Digital Technologies, Thermo Electron Corporation from 1997 to 2000, President of Thermo Washington, Thermo Electron Corporation from 1996 to 1999, Corporate Vice President of Coleman Research Corporation from 1990 to 1996 and President & CEO of Atlantic Systems Research & Engineering from 1984 to 1989.
Wayne W. Broadwater, 81, has been a director since 1997. Mr. Broadwater served as a director of First Patriot Bankshares and Patriot National Bank from 1988 to 1997. He served as President and CEO of Shipmates, Ltd., which he founded in 1972, until its sale in 1997. He is presently the General Partner in Broadwater Investments, a Real Estate Investment and Management Partnership.
William G. Buck, 58, has been a director since 2002. Mr. Buck has been the President of William G. Buck & Associates, Inc., a real estate brokerage, development and property management firm in Arlington, Virginia, since 1976. He has over fifteen years of prior experience as a member of the board of directors of several local banks, including United Bank (formerly George Mason Bank) from 1992 to 2000.
Bernard H. Clineburg, 56, has been a director since 2001. Mr. Clineburg is our Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Clineburg, a local bank executive for more than 30 years, is the former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of United Bank (formerly George Mason Bank). While Mr. Clineburg held the position as President, and later Chief Executive Officer, George Mason Bank grew from $160 million to $1 billion in assets prior to its being acquired by United Bank. Mr. Clineburg serves on the boards of trustees of George Mason University Foundation and the Virginia Bankers Association School of Bank Management. He also is a member of the INOVA Health System Foundation Board and serves on the board of directors of the Virginia Bankers Association. He has held numerous positions in charitable and civic associations.
Sidney O. Dewberry, P.E., L.S., 77, has been a director since 2002. He is currently our lead director. Mr. Dewberry is Chairman and Founder of Dewberry, which includes Dewberry & Davis LLC, an architectural, engineering, planning, surveying and landscape architecture firm headquartered in Fairfax, Virginia. Mr. Dewberry serves on numerous boards and committees, including the George Mason University Board of Visitors, the George Mason University Foundation Board of Trustees, the Greater Washington Board of Trade Board of Directors, the Northern Virginia Roundtable, the
71
Washington Airports Task Force Board of Directors, the Northern Virginia Transportation Alliance, the Virginia Business-Higher Education Council, and the INOVA Health Systems Foundation Board. He is the chairman of the George Mason University Capital Campaign Committee.
John W. Fisher, 50, has been a director since 2002. Mr. Fisher founded the investment management firm of Wilson/Bennett Company in 1987 and Wilson/Bennett Capital Management, Inc. in 1994. He is the President and Chief Investment Officer of Wilson/Bennett Capital Management. Prior to founding the Wilson/Bennett Company, Mr. Fisher was a Vice President with the E. F. Hutton Company. On April 29, 2005, we signed a definitive agreement to acquire Wilson/Bennett in a stock and cash transaction. See "Summary—Recent Developments," and "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."
Michael A. Garcia, 45, has been a director since 2003. He is President and Owner of Mike Garcia Construction, Inc. in Manassas, Virginia. Over its 23 years in business, Mr. Garcia has been recognized for excellence in home design and commercial construction. Mr. Garcia was honored as Northern Virginia's Builder of the Year in 1995 and received Southern Living magazine's choice for exclusive builder in Northern Virginia in 1995. Mr. Garcia was a founding director of our subsidiary Cardinal Bank—Manassas/Prince William, N.A. in 1999 and became a director of Cardinal Bank when the two subsidiaries were merged in 2002.
J. Hamilton Lambert, 64, has been a director since 1999. Mr. Lambert is President of J. Hamilton Lambert and Associates, a consulting firm based in Fairfax, Virginia. He served as County Executive of Fairfax County from August 1980 to December 1990.
William E. Peterson, 43, has been a director since 2002. He has been Principal and Officer of The Peterson Companies for the past thirteen years. The Peterson Companies is a diversified real estate development and management company with over $120 million in annual revenues operating in 12 local jurisdictions in the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Mr. Peterson served as The Peterson Companies' Chief Financial Officer from 1992 until 2001. In October 2001, he assumed the position of Chief Operating Officer of Peterson Management Company, which manages a commercial office and retail real estate portfolio of over six million square feet. Mr. Peterson also has served on the boards of various charitable and community organizations including Leadership Fairfax, Northern Virginia Conservation Trust, and various United Methodist Church Boards.
James D. Russo, 58, has been a director since 1997. Mr. Russo has been the Managing Director of Potomac Consultants Group in Virginia since 2000, and the Executive Director of Finance of Advancis Pharmaceutical Corporation since 2001. He was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Shire Laboratories, Inc., a pharmaceutical research and development company in Rockville, Maryland, from 1994 to 2000. Mr. Russo has served on the board of directors and audit committee of the board of directors of Lion, Inc., a mortgage industry services provider, since August 2004 and serves on the board of trustees of TESST College of Technology.
John H. Rust, Jr., 57, has been a director since 1997. He is currently the Company's Vice Chairman. Mr. Rust has been an attorney with the law firm of Rust & Rust in Fairfax, Virginia since March 2001. He previously was of counsel in the law firm of Wilkes Artis from September 1998 to February 2001. From 1989 to 1997, Mr. Rust was Chairman of First Patriot Bankshares. Mr. Rust was a member of the Virginia House of Delegates from 1980-1982 and 1997-2001.
George P. Shafran, 78, has been a director since 2000. Mr. Shafran is President of Geo. P. Shafran & Associates, Inc., a real estate consulting firm in McLean, Virginia. He was a director of Heritage Bancorp, Inc. and its predecessor, The Heritage Bank, from 1997-2000. He currently serves on numerous boards and committees, including NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc, the National Capital Area Red Cross, High Performance Group and E-Lynxx Corp. He is Chairman of the AAA Mid-Atlantic advisory board and serves as a member of the advisory board of Base Technologies, Inc.
72
Alice M. Starr, 56, has been a director since 2001. She is President and CEO of Starr Strategies, a consulting firm which helps small companies and non-profit organizations strategize on public relations, marketing and fundraising goals. She was Vice President of WEST*GROUP, a commercial real estate firm headquartered in McLean, Virginia, from 1990 to 2004. Ms. Starr worked as director of Consumer Affairs for NVR, a large national homebuilder headquartered in McLean, and she served as Vice President for Business and Community Services at the Washington Airports Task Force. Ms. Starr serves as a director of EnviroSystems, Inc., a California-based privately held nano-technology firm. She also serves on the GreenSea Venture, Inc. and Preserve at Walnut Springs boards as well as the Advisory Board for Mount Vernon. She has served on numerous non-profit boards, including the American Red Cross, Safe Community Coalition, Claude Moore Colonial Farm, Virginians for the Arts, George Mason University Student Life Services, Committee for Dulles and Medical Care for Children Partnership.
Executive Officers and Significant Employees
The following information sets forth as of May 9, 2005 the names, ages, principal occupations and business experience for the past five years for all current executive officers. Such information with respect to Bernard H. Clineburg, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, is set forth above in "The Board of Directors" section.
Christopher W. Bergstrom, 45, has been President of Cardinal Bank since 2002. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of Cardinal Bank-Manassas/Prince William, N.A. from 1999 to 2002 when it merged with Cardinal Bank, N.A. Between 1982 and 1998, Mr. Bergstrom was employed with Crestar Bank where he served in a variety of retail and commercial functions including management of one of the organization's commercial banking divisions covering Northern Virginia, the District of Columbia and southern Maryland. Mr. Bergstrom will serve as our Interim Chief Credit Officer until we identify a replacement for Mr. Dodson.
Robert E. Bradecamp, 51, has been Executive Vice President, Corporate Treasurer for Cardinal Bank since November 2004. From 1994 to 2004, he was employed by Riggs Bank, N.A. serving as Treasurer from 1996 to 2004 with duties that included interest rate risk management, liquidity management and portfolio management. Prior to joining Riggs, he was employed by MNC Financial Corp. serving various functions in their treasury area.
Robert A. Cern, 54, has been our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since October 2004. From 2001 to 2004, he was Senior Vice President and Controller of Riggs Bank, N.A., and had similar functional responsibilities for Riggs National Corporation, both located in Washington, D.C. Prior to joining Riggs, he was Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Permanent Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary, Permanent Bank, of Evansville, Indiana from 1998 to 2000.
Carl E. Dodson, 50, has been our Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer since 1998 and our Chief Operating Officer since 2001. Mr. Dodson was the senior commercial lending officer of Palmer National Bank in Washington, D.C. from 1983 to 1996 and, following its sale to George Mason Bankshares in 1996, he was the Senior Vice President of Credit Administration of George Mason Bank (now United Bank). Mr. Dodson notified us on April 22, 2005 that he would be resigning from his position effective May 16, 2005.
Dennis M. Griffith, 56, has been the Executive Vice President of our Real Estate Lending Group since April 2002. From 1973 through 2001, Mr. Griffith was employed by Bank of America and its predecessor organizations. He held various real estate, lending and management positions including Manager of Commercial Real Estate for the metropolitan Washington, D.C. area.
Kim C. Liddell, 44, has been our Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer since March 2004. From 2001 to 2004, Mr. Liddell was employed by two community banks, SeqouiaBank in Bethesda, Maryland and Planters Bank in Staunton, Virginia, where he was Senior Vice President
73
responsible for the Retail Banking, Marketing, Small Business Lending, and Mortgage Banking divisions. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. Liddell was the retail sales manager for 87 branches of First Virginia Bank in Northern Virginia, and from 1984 to 1999, he worked his way up in that bank's Retail Banking Division from management trainee to regional sales manager for 23 branches in Northern Virginia.
F. Kevin Reynolds, 45, has been President of Cardinal Bank since 1999 and our Executive Vice President and Senior Lending Officer since 1998. Prior to 1998, Mr. Reynolds was the senior lending officer responsible for all facets of the commercial lending business of George Mason Bank and helped create George Mason Bank's commercial lending group. Mr. Reynolds is the current President of the Northern Virginia Bankers Association.
Eleanor D. Schmidt, 44, has been with us since 1998. Since November 2004, she has served as the Executive Vice President for Regulatory Compliance and Deposit Operations. From 1998 to 2004, she served as the Senior Vice President and then executive Vice President for Retail Banking, Marketing, Human Resources and Training. Prior to 1998, Ms. Schmidt was employed with NationsBank and its predecessor banks for over 17 years. Her responsibilities included Area Manager, training, lending and other positions of management in Northern Virginia.
The following information sets forth as of May 9, 2005 the names, ages, principal occupations and business experience for the past five years for our other significant employees.
D. Gene Merrill, 59, has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of George Mason since 2004. Prior to 2004, he was the President and Chief Executive Officer of George Mason since 1993.
H. Ed Dean, 36, has been President of George Mason since 2004. Prior to 2004, he was the Executive Vice President of George Mason since 1994.
74
Security Ownership of Management
The following table sets forth certain information, as of May 11, 2005, with respect to beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock by each of the members of the Board of Directors and by each of the executive officers named in the "Summary Compensation Table" below and by all directors and executive officers as a group. Beneficial ownership includes shares, if any, held in the name of the spouse, minor children or other relatives of the individual living in such person's home, as well as shares, if any, held in the name of another person under an arrangement whereby the director, nominee or executive officer can vest title in himself or herself at once or at some future time.
Name(1) |
Common Stock Beneficially Owned(2) |
Exercisable Options Included in Beneficially Owned Common Stock(3) |
Percentage of Class |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Directors | |||||||
B. G. Beck | 98,054 | — | * | ||||
Wayne W. Broadwater | 75,819 | 8,500 | * | ||||
William G. Buck | 90,100 | — | * | ||||
Bernard H. Clineburg(4) | 622,746 | 487,000 | 3.27 | % | |||
Sidney O. Dewberry | 95,100 | 1,000 | * | ||||
John W. Fisher | 48,000 | 1,000 | * | ||||
Michael A. Garcia | 30,218 | 1,950 | * | ||||
J. Hamilton Lambert | 67,128 | 4,500 | * | ||||
William E. Peterson | 99,000 | 1,000 | * | ||||
James D. Russo | 133,840 | 7,450 | * | ||||
John H. Rust, Jr. | 124,703 | 9,500 | * | ||||
George P. Shafran | 174,631 | 15,167 | * | ||||
Alice M. Starr | 41,700 | 450 | * | ||||
Named Executive Officers |
|||||||
Christopher W. Bergstrom | 65,937 | 41,485 | * | ||||
Carl E. Dodson | 56,691 | 34,334 | * | ||||
F. Kevin Reynolds | 66,906 | 41,931 | * | ||||
Dennis M. Griffith | 36,635 | 31,000 | * | ||||
Current Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (21 persons) |
2,014,456 |
753,567 |
10.45 |
% |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
As of May 11, 2005, we were not aware of any shareholders that beneficially owned five percent or more of the outstanding shares of common stock.
75
Director Compensation
Each director is entitled to receive cash compensation for his or her service on the Board of Directors. Each director is paid $200 for each Board meeting attended, $100 for each committee meeting attended, and $175 for each Executive Committee meeting attended. James D. Russo, in his capacity as Audit Committee Chairman, receives a retainer of $60,000 annually.
John H. Rust, Jr., the Vice Chairman of the Board, receives a salary of $52,000 annually. Mr. Rust participates in our group health insurance plan and his insurance is paid 100% by us. Health insurance paid by us for the benefit of Mr. Rust for 2004 was $8,400. In addition, Mr. Rust received $10,160 in 2004 as compensation for use and maintenance of his automobile and country club dues.
As of January 2005, each non-employee director is eligible to participate in a deferred income plan with respect to his meeting fees and/or retainer. We match in cash 50% of the deferred fees and retainers, up to a maximum of $10,000 per year per director.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member of the Compensation Committee is a current or former officer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. In addition, there are no compensation committee interlocks with other entities with respect to any such member.
Executive Officer Compensation
The following table shows, for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, the cash compensation paid by us, as well as certain other compensation paid or accrued for those years, to each of the named executive officers in all capacities in which they served:
|
|
Annual Compensation |
Long Term Compensation |
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name and Principal Position |
Year |
Salary ($) |
Bonus ($) |
Other Annual Compensation ($) |
Securities Underlying Options (#) |
All Other Compensation ($)(1) |
||||||
Bernard H. Clineburg Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cardinal Financial Corporation |
2004 2003 2002 |
249,043 203,758 200,000 |
250,000 50,000 50,000 |
(2) (2) (2) |
150,000 201,000 151,000 |
(3) (3) |
1,938 5,975 4,615 |
|||||
F. Kevin Reynolds President, Cardinal Bank |
2004 2003 2002 |
137,184 119,973 105,115 |
40,000 27,600 15,000 |
(2) (2) (2) |
10,000 10,000 10,000 |
3,126 3,020 3,179 |
||||||
Christopher W. Bergstrom President, Cardinal Bank |
2004 2003 2002 |
137,184 119,388 105,115 |
40,000 27,600 15,000 |
(2) (2) (2) |
10,000 10,000 10,000 |
2,821 3,009 3,091 |
||||||
Carl E. Dodson Chief Credit Officer, Cardinal Financial Corporation |
2004 2003 2002 |
141,366 123,407 108,500 |
10,000 28,400 17,000 |
(2) (2) (2) |
10,000 10,000 12,500 |
4,014 3,312 — |
||||||
Dennis M. Griffith Executive Vice President, Cardinal Bank |
2004 2003 2002 |
(4) |
136,974 118,990 70,962 |
40,000 27,500 — |
(2) (2) (2) |
10,000 10,000 10,000 |
2,650 2,212 1,455 |
76
Stock Options
The following table sets forth information regarding the grants of stock options to each of the named executive officers in 2004:
Option Grants in the Year ended December 31, 2004
Name |
Number of Securities Underlying Options Granted(1) |
Percent of Total Options Granted to Employees in 2004 (%)(2) |
Exercise or Base Price ($/Share)(3) |
Expiration Date |
Grant Date Present Value ($)(4) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bernard H. Clineburg | 150,000 | 27.9 | % | 8.28 | 1/14/2014 | 433,335 | ||||
F. Kevin Reynolds | 10,000 | 1.9 | % | 8.28 | 1/14/2014 | 28,889 | ||||
Christopher W. Bergstrom | 10,000 | 1.9 | % | 8.28 | 1/14/2014 | 28,889 | ||||
Carl E. Dodson | 10,000 | 1.9 | % | 8.28 | 1/14/2014 | 28,889 | ||||
Dennis M. Griffith | 10,000 | 1.9 | % | 8.28 | 1/14/2014 | 28,889 |
The following table sets forth information with respect to the exercise of stock options by the named executive officers in 2004 and the amount and value of stock options held by the named executive officers as of December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options at Fiscal Year End |
Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options at Fiscal Year End ($)(2) |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name |
Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) |
Value Realized ($)(1) |
||||||||||
Exercisable |
Unexercisable |
Exercisable |
Unexercisable |
|||||||||
Bernard H. Clineburg | 5,000 | 33,700 | 232,000 | 270,000 | 1,379,930 | 1,456,500 | ||||||
F. Kevin Reynolds | — | — | 22,931 | 18,000 | 132,776 | 103,620 | ||||||
Christopher W. Bergstrom | — | — | 22,485 | 18,000 | 130,260 | 103,620 | ||||||
Carl E. Dodson | — | — | 22,334 | 19,500 | 133,064 | 115,455 | ||||||
Dennis M. Griffith | — | — | 12,000 | 18,000 | 69,080 | 103,620 |
77
Employment Agreements
Bernard H. Clineburg has an employment agreement with us. Mr. Clineburg's agreement, which is dated as of February 12, 2002, provides for his services as our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. The agreement also provides that Mr. Clineburg will serve as our Chairman of the Executive Committee, a member or Chair of all of our Board Committees except the Audit Committee, and as a director or Chair of all our subsidiaries' boards of directors. Mr. Clineburg's employment agreement provides for a base salary of $200,000 and includes annual salary increases at the discretion of the Board of Directors and provides bonuses at the discretion of the Board of Directors, in cash or in stock, or both. Under Mr. Clineburg's employment agreement, he was granted an option to purchase 150,000 shares of Common Stock, of which 110,000 are currently vested. The option to purchase the remaining 40,000 shares will vest over a three-year period at 20,000 shares per year. All options vest immediately if Mr. Clineburg's employment is terminated for any reason except for cause. All options granted under the employment agreement were awarded with an option exercise price equal to the value of the shares on May 3, 2002. In the event we terminate Mr. Clineburg's agreement without cause, he will receive a lump-sum severance payment equal to one year's annual salary and bonus. In the event Mr. Clineburg's employment agreement is terminated after a change in control, he will receive a lump-sum severance payment equal to 2.99 times his average total compensation over the most recent five calendar year period of his employment with us prior to termination. If Mr. Clineburg's employment is terminated in 2005 following a change in control, his lump-sum severance could be equal to as much as $2.0 million. Mr. Clineburg's employment agreement includes a covenant not to compete with us for a period of one year from the date he is no longer employed by us. Mr. Clineburg is also able to participate in any employee benefit compensation plan offered by us.
Each of F. Kevin Reynolds, Christopher W. Bergstrom, and Carl E. Dodson, has an employment agreement with us, which is terminable at will by either party. Each of these employment agreements are effective as of February 12, 2002 and provide for the provision of a base salary, eligibility for annual performance bonus and stock option grants, and participation in our benefits plans, all of which may be adjusted by us in our discretion. In addition, each employment agreement is subject to certain restrictive covenants in the event the officer voluntarily terminates his employment or is terminated for cause. Specifically, each officer is prohibited from rendering competing banking services in the local area and from soliciting our clients, prospective clients or employees for a certain period (12 months for Mr. Reynolds and Mr. Bergstrom, and six months for Mr. Dodson) following the date of termination. Mr. Reynolds' and Mr. Bergstrom's employment agreements provide for severance payments equal to 12 months of their current base salary in the event of termination without cause and 18 months of their current base salary in the event of a change in control. Mr. Dodson's employment agreement provides for severance payments equal to six months of his current base salary in the event of termination without cause and 18 months of his current base salary in the event of a change in control. The lump-sum severance payment for each of Mr. Reynolds, Mr. Bergstrom and Mr. Dodson, if his employment is terminated in 2005 following a change in control, would equal $206,000, $206,000 and $212,000, respectively.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Some of our directors and officers are at present, as in the past, our banking customers. As such, we have, and expect to have in the future, banking transactions in the ordinary course of our business with directors, officers, principal shareholders and their associates, on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral on loans, as those prevailing at the same time for comparable transactions with others. These transactions do not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features. The aggregate outstanding balance of loans to directors, executive officers and their associates, as a group, at March 31, 2005 totaled approximately $22.3 million, or 22% of the bank's equity capital at that date.
78
William E. Peterson, a director, is the manager and a 3.1% owner of Fairfax Corner Mixed Use, L.C. Fairfax Corner Mixed Use, L.C. owns a building in the Fairfax Corner shopping center and leases office space to George Mason. The lease commenced on July 1, 2002 and will terminate on June 30, 2007 without any option to extend. The rent that George Mason pays to Fairfax Corner Mixed Use, L.C. ranges from $1.2 million to $1.5 million per year during the term of the lease. Rent payments totaled $1.4 million in 2004.
On April 29, 2005, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange with Wilson/Bennett Capital Management, Inc., an asset management firm based in Alexandria, Virginia. John W. Fisher, a member of our Board of Directors, is the founder and President and Chief Investment Officer of Wilson/Bennett and owns 90% of the firm. Under the terms of the Agreement, we plan to acquire Wilson/Bennett from Mr. Fisher and James Moloney, the other shareholder of Wilson/Bennett, for approximately $6.6 million in a combination of common stock and cash. The cash portion of the transaction will be approximately $1.1 million.
The closing of the transaction is subject to all necessary regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions. In addition, the closing of the transaction is also subject to the conditions that clients of Wilson/Bennett representing at least 75% of the assets under management have consented to the transaction, that we enter into an employment agreement with Mr. Fisher and that Wilson/Bennett obtain, at our expense, a term life insurance policy on the life of Mr. Fisher in an amount of no less than $3,000,000. We will be the beneficiary under that policy. We expect that, if the conditions are satisfied, the transaction will close early in the third quarter of 2005. At that time, Wilson/Bennett will become a subsidiary of Cardinal Financial Corporation.
Because Mr. Fisher is one of our directors, the transaction was negotiated primarily between us and Mr. Moloney, who acted on behalf of himself and as Mr. Fisher's representative. We believe that the terms of the transaction are substantially similar to the terms of similar transactions that are the result of "arms length" negotiations between unrelated parties. In addition, Mr. Fisher will no longer be considered one of our "independent" directors under applicable Nasdaq listing requirements, and his board responsibilities, including committee memberships, will be adjusted to reflect his new status.
79
Our authorized capital stock consists of 50,000,000 common shares, par value $1.00 per share, and 10,000,000 preferred shares, par value $1.00 per share, issuable in series. As of May 9, 2005 there were 18,530,894 common shares issued and outstanding held by 699 shareholders of record. The issued common shares represent non-withdrawable capital, are not accounts of an insurable type, and are not federally insured.
Common Stock
Voting Rights
Each holder of common shares is entitled to one vote per share held on any matter submitted to a vote of shareholders. There are no cumulative voting rights in the election of directors.
Dividends
Holders of common shares are entitled to receive dividends when and as declared by the board of directors out of funds legally available therefor, provided however, that the payment of dividends to holders of common shares is subject to the preferential dividend rights of the preferred stock. Cardinal Financial is a corporation separate and distinct from Cardinal Bank. Since most of Cardinal Financial revenues will be received by it in the form of dividends or interest paid by Cardinal Bank, our ability to pay dividends will be subject to regulatory restrictions as described in "Government Supervision and Regulation—Payment of Dividends" below.
No Preemptive or Conversion Rights
Holders of our common shares do not have preemptive rights to purchase additional shares of any class of our stock, and have no conversion or redemption rights.
Calls and Assessments
All of the issued and outstanding common shares are non-assessable.
Liquidation Rights
In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of common shares (and the holders of any class or series of stock entitled to participate with the common shares in the distribution of assets) shall be entitled to receive, in cash or in kind, our assets available for distribution remaining after payment or provision for payment of our debts and liabilities and distributions or provision for distributions to holders of the preferred stock having preference over the common shares.
Preferred Stock
Our Articles of Incorporation authorize the board of directors to determine the preferences, limitations and relative rights of any class or series of preferred stock before the issuance of any shares of that class or series. There are currently 10,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share, of which 1,412,000 have been designated as the 7.25% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A. 1,411,268 of the Series A preferred were issued, all of which have been converted into common stock.
80
Certain Provisions of Our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws and Virginia Law
General
Our articles of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could make more difficult an acquisition of us by means of a tender offer, a proxy contest or otherwise. These provisions are expected to discourage specific types of coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids as well as to encourage persons seeking to acquire control to first negotiate with us. Although these provisions may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control, we believe that the benefits of increased protection through the potential ability to negotiate with the proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited proposal to acquire or restructure the company outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging these proposals because, among other things, negotiation of such proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.
Classified Board of Directors
Our articles of incorporation and bylaws divide our board of directors into three classes as nearly equal in number as possible. The members of the board serve staggered three years terms so that at least two annual meetings of shareholders may be required for the shareholders to replace a majority of the board of directors. Under our articles of incorporation, our directors may be removed only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of shareholders holding at least two-thirds of the voting power of our common stock. The classification of our board of directors and the inability of shareholders to remove a director without cause and without at least a two-thirds shareholder vote make it more difficult and time consuming to gain control of our board.
Increasing the Number of Directors
Under Virginia law, a board of directors may amend or repeal bylaws unless articles of incorporation or other provisions of Virginia law reserve such power exclusively in the shareholders or the shareholders, in adopting or amending particular bylaws, expressly prohibit the board of directors from amending or repealing that bylaw. Our articles of incorporation do not reserve the power to amend the bylaws to increase or decrease the number of directors exclusively to the shareholders and no bylaw, an no amendment thereto, expressly prohibits the board of directors from amending the bylaws to increase or decrease the number of directors. According to Virginia law, our board of directors may amend our bylaws at any time to increase or decrease the number of directors by up to 30% of the number of directors of all classes immediately following the most recent election of directors by the shareholders. In addition, according to our articles of incorporation and bylaws, the newly created directorships resulting from an increase by not more than two in the number of authorized directors shall be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors then in office. As a result, if faced with an attempt to take control of our board, our directors may increase the size of the board and install directors opposed to the hostile takeover attempt.
Blank Check Preferred Stock
As permitted by the Virginia Stock Corporation Act, our board of directors may issue shares of preferred stock without shareholder approval. Our board of directors has the flexibility to deter attempts to gain control of us by including extraordinary voting, dividend, redemption or conversion rights in any preferred stock that it may deem appropriate to issue. We currently do not have plans to issue any shares of capital stock except as set forth in this prospectus or in the ordinary course of business under our equity compensation plans.
81
Inability of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings
Pursuant to our bylaws, special meetings of stockholders may be called only by our president, the chairman of our board of directors or by the board of directors. As a result, shareholders are not able to act on matters other than at annual shareholders meetings unless they are able to persuade the president, the chairman or a majority of the board of directors to call a special meeting.
Advance Notification Requirements
Our bylaws also require a shareholder who desires to nominate a candidate for election to the board of directors or to raise new business at annual shareholders meeting to provide us advance notice of at least 60 days and no more than 90 days before the scheduled date of the annual meeting. Our bylaws further condition the presentation of shareholder nominations for director or proposals for business on compliance with a number of conditions.
Effects of Virginia Anti-Takeover Statutes
The Virginia Stock Corporation Act contains provisions governing "Affiliated Transactions." Affiliated Transactions include certain mergers and share exchanges, material dispositions of corporate assets not in the ordinary course of business, any dissolution of the corporation proposed by or on behalf of an Interested Shareholder (as defined below), or reclassifications, including reverse stock splits, recapitalizations or mergers of the corporation with its subsidiaries which have the effect of increasing the percentage of voting shares beneficially owned by an Interested Shareholder by more than 5%. For purposes of the Virginia Act, an "Interested Shareholder" is defined as any beneficial owner of more than 10% of any class of the voting securities of a Virginia corporation.
Subject to certain exceptions discussed below, the provisions governing Affiliated Transactions require that, for three years following the date upon which any shareholder becomes an Interested Shareholder, a Virginia corporation cannot engage in an Affiliated Transaction with such Interested Shareholder unless approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the voting shares of the corporation, other than the shares beneficially owned by the Interested Shareholder, and by a majority (but not less than two) of the "Disinterested Directors." A Disinterested Director means, with respect to a particular Interested Shareholder, a member of a corporation's board of directors who (i) was a member before the later of January 1, 1988 and the date on which an Interested Shareholder became an Interested Shareholder and (ii) was recommended for election by, or was elected to fill a vacancy and received the affirmative vote of, a majority of the Disinterested Directors then on the board. At the expiration of the three-year period, these provisions require approval of Affiliated Transactions by the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the voting shares of the corporation, other than those beneficially owned by the Interested Shareholder.
The principal exceptions to the special voting requirement apply to Affiliated Transactions occurring after the three-year period has expired and require either that the transaction be approved by a majority of the Disinterested Directors or that the transaction satisfy certain fair price requirements. In general, the fair price requirements provide that the shareholders must receive the highest per share price for their shares as was paid by the Interested Shareholder for his shares or the fair market value of their shares, whichever is higher. They also require that, during the three years preceding the announcement of the proposed Affiliated Transaction, all required dividends have been paid and no special financial accommodations have been accorded the Interested Shareholder unless approved by a majority of the Disinterested Directors.
None of the foregoing limitations and special voting requirements applies to an Affiliated Transaction with an Interested Shareholder whose acquisition of shares making such person an Interested Shareholder was approved by a majority of the corporation's Disinterested Directors.
82
These provisions were designed to deter certain takeovers of Virginia corporations. In addition, the statute provides that, by affirmative vote of a majority of the voting shares other than shares owned by any Interested Shareholder, a corporation may adopt, by meeting certain voting requirements, an amendment to its articles of incorporation or bylaws providing that the Affiliated Transactions provisions shall not apply to the corporation. We have not adopted such an amendment.
The Virginia Stock Corporation Act also contains provisions regulating certain "control share acquisitions," which are transactions causing the voting strength of any person acquiring beneficial ownership of shares of a public corporation in Virginia to meet or exceed certain threshold percentages (20%, 331/3% or 50%) of the total votes entitled to be cast for the election of directors. Shares acquired in a control share acquisition have no voting rights unless: (i) the voting rights are granted by a majority vote of all outstanding shares other than those held by the acquiring person or any officer or employee director of the corporation, or (ii) the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the corporation provide that these Virginia law provisions do not apply to acquisitions of its shares. The acquiring person may require that a special meeting of the shareholders be held to consider the grant of voting rights to the shares acquired in the control share acquisition. These provisions were designed to deter certain takeovers of Virginia public corporations. However, our bylaws contain a provision that makes these provisions inapplicable to acquisitions of our stock.
Limitations on Liability of Officers and Directors
As permitted by the Virginia Stock Corporation Act, our Articles of Incorporation contain provisions that permit us to indemnify our directors and officers to the full extent permitted by Virginia law and eliminate the personal liability of our directors and officers for monetary damages to us or our shareholders for breach of their fiduciary duties, except to the extent that Virginia law prohibits indemnification or elimination of liability. These provisions do not limit or eliminate our rights or the rights of any shareholder to seek an injunction or any other non-monetary relief in the event of a breach of a director's or officer's fiduciary duty. In addition, these provisions apply only to claims against a director or officer arising out of his or her role as a director or officer and do not relieve a director or officer from liability if he or she engaged in willful misconduct or a knowing violation of the criminal law or any federal or state securities law.
The rights of indemnification provided in our Articles of Incorporation are not exclusive of any other rights that may be available under any insurance or other agreement, by vote of shareholders or disinterested directors or otherwise.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling us pursuant to the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission this type of indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
Shares Eligible for Future Sale
All of the shares that we will issue in this offering will be freely tradable without restriction or registration under the Securities Act, unless acquired by our affiliates or acquired by a person who is subject to the lock up agreements described in the "Underwriting" section below.
As of May 9, 2005, we had outstanding 18,530,894 shares of common stock. Of these amounts, approximately 1,260,886 shares of our common stock are held by persons who may be deemed to be our affiliates under the Securities Act. In addition, approximately 648,152 shares of our outstanding common stock may be deemed "restricted securities" within the meaning of Rule 144. Both shares held by our affiliates and shares that are "restricted securities" may be resold by the holders only in transactions registered under the Securities Act or permitted by the provisions of Rule 144.
83
Rule 144 under the Securities Act defines an affiliate of an issuer as a person that directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the issuer. Rule 405 under the Securities Act defines the term "control" to mean the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of the person whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract, or otherwise. All of our directors and executive officers will likely be deemed to be affiliates of us.
In general, under Rule 144, any person (or persons whose shares are aggregated) who has beneficially owned restricted securities for at least one year, including affiliates, and any affiliate who holds shares sold in a public offering, may sell, within any three-month period, a number of such shares that does not exceed the greater of 1% of the then outstanding shares or the average weekly trading volume of the shares during the four calendar weeks preceding the sale. Rule 144 also requires that the securities must be sold in "brokers' transactions," as defined in the Securities Act, and the person selling the securities may not solicit orders or make any payment in connection with the offer or sale of securities to any person other than the broker who executes the order to sell the securities. After restricted securities are held for two years, a person who is not deemed an affiliate of us may sell shares under Rule 144 without regard to the volume and manner of sale limitations described above. Sales of shares by our affiliates will continue to be subject to the volume and manner of sale limitations.
We cannot predict the effect, if any, that future sales of shares, or the availability of shares for future sales, will have on the market price prevailing from time to time. Sales of substantial amounts of shares, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the prevailing market price of the shares.
Reports to Shareholders
We furnish annual reports to shareholders which include audited financial statements reported on by our independent accountants. We will continue to comply with the periodic reporting requirements imposed by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as long as such requirements apply to us. In addition, we furnish quarterly reports to shareholders containing unaudited financial statements for each quarter of each fiscal year.
84
GOVERNMENT SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
General
As a financial holding company, we are subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and the examination and reporting requirements of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Other federal and state laws govern the activities of our bank subsidiary, including the activities in which it may engage, the investments that it makes, the aggregate amount of loans that it may grant to one borrower, and the dividends it may declare. Our bank subsidiary is also subject to various consumer and compliance laws. As a state chartered bank, Cardinal Bank is subject to primary regulation, supervision and examination by the Bureau of Financial Institutions of the Virginia State Corporation Commission. Our bank subsidiary also is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. As part of our bank subsidiary, George Mason is subject to the same regulations as the bank.
The following description summarizes the significant federal and state laws applicable to us. To the extent that statutory or regulatory provisions are described, the description is qualified in its entirety by reference to that particular statutory or regulatory provision.
The Bank Holding Company Act
Under the Bank Holding Company Act, we are subject to periodic examination by the Federal Reserve and required to file periodic reports regarding our operations and any additional information that the Federal Reserve may require. Our activities at the bank holding company level are limited to:
Some of the activities that the Federal Reserve Board has determined by regulation to be closely related to the business of a bank holding company include making or servicing loans and specific types of leases, performing specific data processing services and acting in some circumstances as a fiduciary or investment or financial adviser.
With some limited exceptions, the Bank Holding Company Act requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before:
In addition, and subject to some exceptions, the Bank Holding Company Act and the Change in Bank Control Act, together with their regulations, require Federal Reserve approval prior to any person or company acquiring "control" of a bank holding company. Control is conclusively presumed to exist if an individual or company acquires 25% or more of any class of voting securities of the bank holding company. Control is rebuttably presumed to exist if a person acquires 10% or more, but less than 25%, of any class of voting securities and if the institution has registered securities under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or no other person owns a greater percentage of that class of voting securities immediately after the transaction. The regulations provide a procedure for challenging this rebuttable control presumption.
85
In November 1999, Congress enacted the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ("GLBA"), which made substantial revisions to the statutory restrictions separating banking activities from other financial activities. Under the GLBA, bank holding companies that are well-capitalized and well-managed and meet other conditions can elect to become "financial holding companies." As financial holding companies, they and their subsidiaries are permitted to acquire or engage in previously impermissible activities such as insurance underwriting and distribution, and securities underwriting and distribution. In addition, financial holding companies may also acquire or engage in certain activities in which bank holding companies are not permitted to engage in, such as travel agency or insurance agency activities, merchant banking and other activities that the Federal Reserve determines to be financial in nature or complementary to these activities. Financial holding companies continue to be subject to the overall oversight and supervision of the Federal Reserve, but the GLBA applies the concept of functional regulation to the activities conducted by subsidiaries. For example, insurance activities would be subject to supervision and regulation by state insurance authorities. We became a financial holding company in 2004.
Payment of Dividends
We are a legal entity separate and distinct from Cardinal Bank, Cardinal Wealth Services, Inc., and Cardinal Statutory Trust I. Virtually all of our revenues will result from dividends paid to us by our bank subsidiary and interest earned on short term investments. Our bank subsidiary is subject to laws and regulations that limit the amount of dividends that it can pay. Under Virginia law, a bank may not declare a dividend in excess of its undivided profits, which means that our bank subsidiary must recover any start-up losses before it may pay a dividend to us. Additionally, our bank subsidiary may not declare a dividend if the total amount of all dividends, including the proposed dividend, declared by the bank in any calendar year exceeds the total of the bank's retained net income of that year to date, combined with its retained net income of the two preceding years, unless the dividend is approved by the FDIC. Our bank subsidiary may not declare or pay any dividend if, after making the dividend, the bank would be "undercapitalized," as defined in the banking regulations.
The FDIC and the state have the general authority to limit the dividends paid by insured banks if the payment is deemed an unsafe and unsound practice. Both the state and the FDIC have indicated that paying dividends that deplete a bank's capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsound and unsafe banking practice.
In addition, we are subject to certain regulatory requirements to maintain capital at or above regulatory minimums. These regulatory requirements regarding capital affect our dividend policies. Banking regulators have indicated that banking organizations should generally pay dividends only if the organization's net income available to common shareholders over the past year has been sufficient to fully fund the dividends, and the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with the organization's capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition.
Insurance of Accounts, Assessments and Regulation by the FDIC
The deposits of our bank subsidiary are insured by the FDIC up to the limits set forth under applicable law. The deposits of our bank subsidiary are subject to the deposit insurance assessments of the Bank Insurance Fund, or ("BIF"), of the FDIC.
The FDIC has implemented a risk-based deposit insurance assessment system under which the assessment rate for an insured institution may vary according to regulatory capital levels of the institution and other factors, including supervisory evaluations. For example, depository institutions insured by the BIF that are "well capitalized" and that present few or no supervisory concerns are required to pay only the statutory minimum assessment of $2,000 annually for deposit insurance, while all other banks are required to pay premiums ranging from 0.03% to 0.27% of domestic deposits.
86
These rate schedules are subject to future adjustments by the FDIC. In addition to being influenced by the risk profile of the particular depository institution, FDIC premiums are also influenced by the size of the FDIC insurance fund in relation to total deposits in FDIC insured banks. The FDIC has authority to impose special assessments from time to time.
The FDIC is authorized to prohibit any BIF-insured institution from engaging in any activity that the FDIC determines by regulation or order to pose a serious threat to the insurance fund. Also, the FDIC may initiate enforcement actions against banks, after first giving the institution's primary regulatory authority an opportunity to take such action. The FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any depository institution if it determines, after a hearing, that the institution has engaged or is engaging in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, order or any condition imposed in writing by the FDIC. It also may suspend deposit insurance temporarily during the hearing process for the permanent termination of insurance, if the institution has no tangible capital. If deposit insurance is terminated, the deposits at the institution at the time of termination, less subsequent withdrawals, shall continue to be insured for a period from six months to two years, as determined by the FDIC. We are unaware of any existing circumstances that could result in termination of any of our bank subsidiary's deposit insurance.
Capital Requirements
Each of the FDIC and the Federal Reserve Board has issued risk-based and leverage capital guidelines applicable to banking organizations that it supervises. Under the risk-based capital requirements, we and our bank subsidiary are each generally required to maintain a minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets (including specific off-balance sheet activities, such as standby letters of credit) of 8%. At least half of the total capital must be composed of "Tier 1 Capital", which is defined as common equity, retained earnings, qualifying perpetual preferred stock and minority interest in common equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less certain intangibles. The remainder may consist of "Tier 2 Capital", which is defined as specific subordinated debt, some hybrid capital instruments and other qualifying preferred stock and a limited amount of the loan loss allowance, and pretax unrealized holding gains on certain equity securities. In addition, each of the federal banking regulatory agencies has established minimum leverage capital requirements for banking organizations. Under these requirements, banking organizations must maintain a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to adjusted average quarterly assets equal to 3% to 5%, subject to federal bank regulatory evaluation of an organization's overall safety and soundness. In summary, the capital measures used by the federal banking regulators are:
Under these regulations, a bank will be:
87
The risk-based capital standards of each of the FDIC and the Federal Reserve Board explicitly identify concentrations of credit risk and the risk arising from non-traditional activities, as well as an institution's ability to manage these risks, as important factors to be taken into account by the agency in assessing an institution's overall capital adequacy. The capital guidelines also provide that an institution's exposure to a decline in the economic value of its capital due to changes in interest rates be considered by the agency as a factor in evaluating a banking organization's capital adequacy.
The FDIC may take various corrective actions against any undercapitalized bank and any bank that fails to submit an acceptable capital restoration plan or fails to implement a plan acceptable to the FDIC. These powers include, but are not limited to, requiring the institution to be recapitalized, prohibiting asset growth, restricting interest rates paid, requiring prior approval of capital distributions by any bank holding company that controls the institution, requiring divestiture by the institution of its subsidiaries or by the holding company of the institution itself, requiring new election of directors, and requiring the dismissal of directors and officers. Our bank subsidiary presently maintains sufficient capital to remain in compliance with these capital requirements.
Other Safety and Soundness Regulations
There are a number of obligations and restrictions imposed on bank holding companies and their depository institution subsidiaries by federal law and regulatory policy that are designed to reduce potential loss exposure to the depositors of such depository institutions and to the FDIC insurance fund in the event that the depository institution is insolvent or is in danger of becoming insolvent. These obligations and restrictions are not for the benefit of investors. Regulators may pursue an administrative action against any bank holding company or bank which violates the law, engages in an unsafe or unsound banking practice, or which is about to engage in an unsafe and unsound banking practice. The administrative action could take the form of a cease and desist proceeding, a removal action against the responsible individuals or, in the case of a violation of law or unsafe and unsound banking practice, a civil penalty action. A cease and desist order, in addition to prohibiting certain action, could also require that certain action be undertaken. Under the policies of the Federal Reserve Board, we are required to serve as a source of financial strength to our subsidiary depository institution and to commit resources to support the bank in circumstances where we might not do so otherwise.
Interstate Banking and Branching
Current federal law authorizes interstate acquisitions of banks and bank holding companies without geographic limitation. Effective June 1, 1997, a bank headquartered in one state is authorized to merge with a bank headquartered in another state, as long as neither of the states had opted out of such interstate merger authority prior to such date. After a bank has acquired a branch in a state through an interstate merger transaction, the bank may establish and acquire additional branches at any location in the state where a bank headquartered in that state could have established or acquired branches under applicable federal or state law.
88
The Bank Secrecy Act
Under the Bank Secrecy Act ("BSA"), a financial institution is required to have systems in place to detect certain transactions, based on the size and nature of the transaction. Financial institutions are generally required to report cash transactions involving more than $10,000 to the United States Treasury. In addition, financial institutions are required to file suspicious activity reports for transactions that involve more than $5,000 and which the financial institution knows, suspects or has reason to suspect, involves illegal funds, is designed to evade the requirements of the BSA, or has no lawful purpose. The USA PATRIOT act of 2001, enacted in response to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, requires bank regulators to consider a financial institution's compliance with the BSA when reviewing applications from a financial institution. As part of its BSA program, the USA PATRIOT Act also requires a financial institution to follow recently implemented customer identification procedures when opening accounts for new customers and to review lists of individuals and entities who are prohibited from opening accounts at financial institutions.
Monetary Policy
The commercial banking business is affected not only by general economic conditions but also by the monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board. The instruments of monetary policy employed by the Federal Reserve Board include open market operations in United States government securities, changes in the discount rate on member bank borrowing and changes in reserve requirements against deposits held by all federally insured banks. The Federal Reserve Board's monetary policies have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future. In view of changing conditions in the national and international economy and in the money markets, as well as the effect of actions by monetary fiscal authorities, including the Federal Reserve System, no prediction can be made as to possible future changes in interest rates, deposit levels, loan demand or the business and earnings of our bank subsidiary.
Federal Reserve System
In 1980, Congress enacted legislation that imposed reserve requirements on all depository institutions that maintain transaction accounts or non-personal time deposits. NOW accounts and demand deposit accounts that permit payments or transfers to third parties fall within the definition of transaction accounts and are subject to these reserve requirements. For net transaction accounts in 2005, the first $7.0 million will be exempt from reserve requirements. A 3% reserve ratio will be assessed on net transaction accounts over $7.0 million to and including $47.6 million. A 10% reserve ratio will be applied to net transaction accounts in excess of $47.6 million. These percentages are subject to adjustment by the Federal Reserve Board. Because required reserves must be maintained in the form of vault cash or in a non-interest-bearing account at, or on behalf of, a Federal Reserve Bank, the effect of the reserve requirement is to reduce the amount of the institution's interest-earning assets.
Transactions with Affiliates
Transactions between banks and their affiliates are governed by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. An affiliate of a bank is any bank or entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such bank. Generally, Sections 23A and 23B (i) limit the extent to which the bank or its subsidiaries may engage in "covered transactions" with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10% of such institution's capital stock and surplus, and maintain an aggregate limit on all such transactions with affiliates to an amount equal to 20% of such capital stock and surplus, and (ii) require that all such transactions be on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable, to the bank as those provided to a non-affiliate. The term "covered transaction" includes the making of loans, purchase of assets, issuance of a guarantee and similar other types of transactions. Section 23B applies to "covered transactions" as well as sales of assets and payments of money to an affiliate. These
89
transactions must also be conducted on terms substantially the same as, or at least favorable, to the bank as those provided to non-affiliates.
Loans to Insiders
The Federal Reserve Act and related regulations impose specific restrictions on loans to directors, executive officers and principal shareholders of banks. Under Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act, loans to a director, an executive officer and to a principal shareholder of a bank, and to entities controlled by any of the foregoing, may not exceed, together with all other outstanding loans to such person and entities controlled by such person, the bank's loan-to-one borrower limit. Loans in the aggregate to insiders and their related interests as a class may not exceed two times the bank's unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus until the bank's total assets equal or exceed $100,000,000, at which time the aggregate is limited to the bank's unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus. Section 22(h) also prohibits loans above amounts prescribed by the appropriate federal banking agency to directors, executive officers and principal shareholders of a bank or bank holding company, and to entities controlled by such persons, unless such loan is approved in advance by a majority of the board of directors of the bank with any "interested" director not participating in the voting. The FDIC has prescribed the loan amount, which includes all other outstanding loans to such person, as to which such prior board of director approval is required, as being the greater of $25,000 or 5% of capital and surplus (up to $500,000). Section 22(h) requires that loans to directors, executive officers and principal shareholders be made on terms and underwriting standards substantially the same as offered in comparable transactions to other persons.
Community Reinvestment Act
Under the Community Reinvestment Act and related regulations, depository institutions have an affirmative obligation to assist in meeting the credit needs of their market areas, including low and moderate-income areas, consistent with safe and sound banking practice. The Community Reinvestment Act requires the adoption by each institution of a Community Reinvestment Act statement for each of its market areas describing the depository institution's efforts to assist in its community's credit needs. Depository institutions are periodically examined for compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act and are periodically assigned ratings in this regard. Banking regulators consider a depository institution's Community Reinvestment Act rating when reviewing applications to establish new branches, undertake new lines of business, and/or acquire part or all of another depository institution. An unsatisfactory rating can significantly delay or even prohibit regulatory approval of a proposed transaction by a bank holding company or its depository institution subsidiaries.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and federal bank regulators have made various changes to the Community Reinvestment Act. Among other changes, Community Reinvestment Act agreements with private parties must be disclosed and annual reports must be made to a bank's primary federal regulator. A bank holding company will not be permitted to become a financial holding company and no new activities authorized under the GLBA may be commenced by an existing financial holding company or by its subsidiaries if any bank received less than a "satisfactory" rating in its latest Community Reinvestment Act examination.
Fair Lending, Consumer Laws
In addition to the Community Reinvestment Act, other federal and state laws regulate various lending and consumer aspects of the banking business. Governmental agencies, including the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice, have become concerned that prospective borrowers may experience discrimination in their efforts to obtain loans from depository and other lending institutions. These agencies have brought
90
litigation against depository institutions alleging discrimination against borrowers. Many of these suits have been settled, in some cases for material sums, short of a full trial.
These governmental agencies have clarified what they consider to be lending discrimination and have specified various factors that they will use to determine the existence of lending discrimination under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act, including evidence that a lender discriminated on a prohibited basis, evidence that a lender treated applicants differently based on prohibited factors in the absence of evidence that the treatment was the result of prejudice or a conscious intention to discriminate, and evidence that a lender applied an otherwise neutral non-discriminatory policy uniformly to all applicants, but the practice had a discriminatory effect, unless the practice could be justified as a business necessity.
Banks and other depository institutions also are subject to numerous consumer-oriented laws and regulations. These laws, which include the Truth in Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and the Fair Housing Act, require compliance by depository institutions with various disclosure requirements and requirements regulating the availability of funds after deposit or the making of some loans to customers.
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 was signed into law on November 12, 1999. The GLBA covers a broad range of issues, including a repeal of most of the restrictions on affiliations among depository institutions, securities firms and insurance companies. The following description summarizes some of its significant provisions.
The GLBA repeals sections 20 and 32 of the Glass-Steagall Act, thus permitting unrestricted affiliations between banks and securities firms. It also permits bank holding companies to elect to become financial holding companies. A financial holding company may engage in or acquire companies that engage in a broad range of financial services, including securities activities such as underwriting, dealing, investment, merchant banking, insurance underwriting, sales and brokerage activities. In order to become a financial holding company, the bank holding company and all of its affiliated depository institutions must be well-capitalized, well-managed and have at least a satisfactory Community Reinvestment Act rating. We became a financial holding company in 2004.
The GLBA provides that the states continue to have the authority to regulate insurance activities, but prohibits the states in most instances from preventing or significantly interfering with the ability of a bank, directly or through an affiliate, to engage in insurance sales, solicitations or cross-marketing activities. Although the states generally must regulate bank insurance activities in a nondiscriminatory manner, the states may continue to adopt and enforce rules that specifically regulate bank insurance activities in areas identified under the law. Under the new law, the federal bank regulatory agencies adopted insurance consumer protection regulations that apply to sales practices, solicitations, advertising and disclosures.
The GLBA adopts a system of functional regulation under which the Federal Reserve Board is designated as the umbrella regulator for financial holding companies, but financial holding company affiliates are principally regulated by functional regulators such as the FDIC for bank affiliates, the Securities and Exchange Commission for securities affiliates, and state insurance regulators for insurance affiliates. It repeals the broad exemption of banks from the definitions of "broker" and "dealer" for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. It also identifies a set of specific activities, including traditional bank trust and fiduciary activities, in which a bank may engage without being deemed a "broker," and a set of activities in which a bank may engage without being deemed a "dealer." Additionally, GLBA makes conforming changes in the definitions of "broker" and
91
"dealer" for purposes of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended.
The GLBA contains extensive customer privacy protection provisions. Under these provisions, a financial institution must provide to its customers, both at the inception of the customer relationship and on an annual basis, the institution's policies and procedures regarding the handling of customers' nonpublic personal financial information. The law provides that, except for specific limited exceptions, an institution may not provide such personal information to unaffiliated third parties unless the institution discloses to the customer that such information may be so provided and the customer is given the opportunity to opt out of such disclosure. An institution may not disclose to a non-affiliated third party, other than to a consumer reporting agency, customer account numbers or other similar account identifiers for marketing purposes. The GLBA also provides that the states may adopt customer privacy protections that are stricter than those contained in the act.
Future Regulatory Uncertainty
Because federal and state regulation of financial institutions changes regularly and is the subject of constant legislative debate, we cannot forecast how federal and state regulation of financial institutions may change in the future and impact our operations. Although Congress and the state legislature in recent years have sought to reduce the regulatory burden on financial institutions with respect to the approval of specific transactions, we fully expect that the financial institution industry will remain heavily regulated in the near future and that additional laws or regulations may be adopted further regulating specific banking practices.
92
Subject to the terms and conditions in the underwriting agreement dated May 11, 2005, the underwriters named below for whom Raymond James & Associates, Inc. and Legg Mason Wood Walker, Incorporated are acting as representative, have severally agreed to purchase from us the respective number of shares of our common stock set forth opposite their names below:
Underwriters |
Number of Shares |
||
---|---|---|---|
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. | 2,178,000 | ||
Legg Mason Wood Walker, Incorporated | 1,782,000 | ||
BB&T Capital Markets, a division of Scott & Stringfellow, Inc. | 90,000 | ||
Ferris, Baker Watts, Incorporated | 90,000 | ||
Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. | 90,000 | ||
McKinnon & Company, Inc. | 90,000 | ||
Ryan Beck & Co., Inc. | 90,000 | ||
Sandler O'Neill & Partners, L.P. | 90,000 | ||
Total | 4,500,000 | ||
The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the several underwriters to purchase and accept delivery of the common stock offered by this prospectus are subject to approval by their counsel of legal matters and to other conditions set forth in the underwriting agreement. The underwriters are obligated to purchase and accept delivery of all of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus, if any are purchased, other than those covered by the over-allotment option described below.
The underwriters propose to offer the common stock directly to the public at the public offering price indicated on the cover page of this prospectus and to various dealers at that price less a concession not to exceed $0.290 per share, of which $0.100 may be reallowed to other dealers. After this offering, the public offering price, concession and reallowance to dealers may be reduced by the underwriters. No reduction will change the amount of proceeds to be received by us as indicated on the cover page of this prospectus. The shares of common stock are offered by the underwriters as stated in this prospectus, subject to receipt and acceptance by them and subject to their right to reject any order in whole or in part.
We have granted to the underwriters an option, exercisable within 30 days after the date of this prospectus, to purchase from time to time up to an aggregate of 675,000 additional shares of common stock to cover over-allotments, if any, at the public offering price less the underwriting discount. If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option to purchase any of the additional 675,000 shares, each underwriter, subject to certain conditions, will become obligated to purchase its pro rata portion of these additional shares based on the underwriter's percentage purchase commitment in this offering as indicated in the table above. If purchased, these additional shares will be sold by the underwriters on the same terms as those on which the shares offered by this prospectus are being sold. The underwriters may exercise the over-allotment option only to cover over-allotments made in connection with the sale of the shares of common stock offered in this offering.
At our request, the underwriters have reserved up to 10% of the shares of our common stock offered by this prospectus for sale to our directors and employees at the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. These persons must commit to purchase from an underwriter or selected dealer at the same time as the general public. The number of shares available for sale to the general public will be reduced to the extent these persons purchase the reserved shares. Any reserved shares purchased by our directors or executive officers will be subject to the lock up agreements described on the following page. We are not making loans to these officers or directors to purchase such shares.
93
The following table summarizes the underwriting compensation to be paid to the underwriters by us. These amounts assume both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option to purchase additional shares. We estimate that the total expenses payable by us in connection with this offering, other than the underwriting discount referred to below, will be approximately $261,000.
|
Per Share |
Without Option |
With Option |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Underwriting discount payable by us | $ | 0.495 | $ | 2,227,500 | $ | 2,561,625 |
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against various liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, or to contribute to payments the underwriters may be required to make because of any of those liabilities.
Subject to specified exceptions, each of our directors and our executive officers has agreed for a period of 90 days after the date of this prospectus, without the prior written consent of Raymond James & Associates, Inc., not to offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge, grant any option to purchase or otherwise dispose of any shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for any shares of our common stock. This agreement also precludes any hedging collar or other transaction designed or reasonably expected to result in a disposition of our common stock or securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for our common stock.
In addition we have agreed that for 90 days after the date of this prospectus, we will not directly or indirectly without the prior written consent of Raymond James & Associates, Inc., issue, sell, contract to sell, or otherwise dispose of or transfer, any of our common stock or securities convertible into, exercisable for or exchangeable for our common stock, or enter into any swap or other agreement that transfers, in whole or in part, the economic consequences of ownership of our common stock or securities convertible into, exercisable for or exchangeable for our common stock, except for our sale of common stock in this offering, and the issuance of options or shares of common stock under our existing incentive stock plans, employee benefit plans or dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan.
Until this offering is completed, rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission may limit the ability of the underwriters and certain selling group members to bid for and purchase shares of our common stock. As an exception to these rules, the underwriters may engage in certain transactions that stabilize the price of our common stock. These transactions may include short sales, stabilizing transactions, purchases to cover positions created by short sales and passive market making. Short sales involve the sale by the underwriters of a greater number of shares of our common stock than they are required to purchase in this offering. Stabilizing transactions consist of certain bids or purchases made for the purpose of preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of our common stock while this offering is in progress. In passive market making, the underwriter in its capacity as market maker in the common stock may, subject to limitations, make bids for or purchases of our common stock until the time, if any, at which a stabilizing bid is made.
The underwriters also may impose a penalty bid. This occurs when a particular underwriter repays to the other underwriters a portion of the underwriting discount received by it because the representatives have repurchased shares sold by or for the account of such underwriter in stabilizing or short covering transactions.
These activities by the underwriters may stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the market price of our common stock. As a result the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that otherwise might exist in the open market. If these activities are commenced, they may be discontinued by the underwriters without notice at any time. These transactions may be effected on the Nasdaq National Market or otherwise.
94
Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "CFNL." Prior to December 17, 2003, our common stock was listed for quotation on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market under the same symbol.
Certain representatives of the underwriters or their affiliates may in the future perform investment banking and other financial services for us and our affiliates for which they may receive advisory or transaction fees, as applicable, plus out-of-pocket expenses of the nature and in amounts customary in the industry for these financial services.
Through its affiliate, Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., Raymond James & Associates, Inc. has agreed to pay a portion of its underwriting discount, up to approximately $50,000, to Cardinal Wealth Services, Inc. as a finder's fee. Rex Wagner, the President and CEO of Cardinal Wealth Services, Inc., introduced Raymond James & Associates, Inc. to the Company in 2003. Mr. Wagner is a registered representative of Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.
The validity of the shares of our common stock offered and certain other legal matters will be passed upon by Williams Mullen, Richmond, Virginia. Certain legal matters relating to this offering are being passed upon for the underwriters by Vedder, Price, Kaufman & Kammholz, P.C., Chicago, Illinois.
The consolidated financial statements of Cardinal Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 have been included herein and in the registration statement in reliance upon the reports of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The audit report on management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, expresses an opinion that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 because of the effect of a material weakness on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states that as of December 31, 2004, the Company's accounting personnel lacked sufficient resources and expertise to properly account for certain non-routine transactions; the Company's policies and procedures did not provide for timely review of significant non-routine transactions and related accounting entries; and the Company did not maintain sufficient documentation related to the application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles to significant non-routine transactions.
The aforementioned report on management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company acquired George Mason Mortgage, LLC (GMM) during 2004, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, GMM's internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of $392.2 million and pre-tax income of $2.1 million included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004. KPMG's audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of George Mason Mortgage, LLC.
95
The consolidated financial statements of George Mason Mortgage, LLC and subsidiary as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2003, have been included herein and in the registration statement in reliance upon the report of McQuade Brennan, LLP, independent certified public accountants, appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of that firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements, and other documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). The public may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room: 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Also, the SEC maintains an internet website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants, including us, that file electronically with the SEC. The public can obtain any documents that we file at http://www.sec.gov.
We also make available free of charge on or through our internet website (www.cardinalbank.com) our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and, if applicable, amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such materials with, or furnish them to, the SEC.
This prospectus is part of a registration statement filed by us with the SEC. Because the rules and regulations of the SEC allow us to omit certain portions of the registration statement from this prospectus, this prospectus does not contain all the information set forth in the registration statement. You may review the registration statement and the exhibits filed with such registration statement for further information regarding us and the shares of our common stock being sold by this prospectus. The registration statement and its exhibits may be inspected at the public reference facility of the SEC at the locations described above.
96
Cardinal Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries | ||
Consolidated Statements of Condition at March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and December 31, 2004 | F-2 | |
Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited) | F-3 | |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited) | F-4 | |
Consolidated Statements of Changes In Shareholders' Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited) | F-5 | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited) | F-6 | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for March 31, 2005 (unaudited) | F-7 | |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | F-12 | |
Consolidated Statements of Condition at December 31, 2004 and 2003 | F-13 | |
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 | F-14 | |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 | F-15 | |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 | F-16 | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 | F-17 | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | F-18 | |
George Mason Mortgage, LLC |
||
Consolidated Statements of Income for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (unaudited) | F-52 | |
Consolidated Statements of Shareholder's Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (unaudited) | F-53 | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (unaudited) | F-54 | |
Report of Independent Auditors | F-55 | |
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 | F-56 | |
Consolidated Statements of Shareholder's Equity for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 | F-57 | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 | F-58 | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | F-59 | |
Pro forma Financial Information |
F-64 |
|
Pro forma Combined Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2003 (unaudited) | F-65 | |
Pro forma Combined Statement of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2004 (unaudited) | F-66 | |
Notes to Pro forma Combined Condensed Financial Information (unaudited) | F-67 |
F-1
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004
(In thousands, except share data)
|
(Unaudited) March 31, 2005 |
December 31, 2004 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 15,979 | $ | 15,205 | ||||
Federal funds sold | 17,650 | 8,203 | ||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents | 33,629 | 23,408 | ||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale | 163,377 | 151,554 | ||||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity (market value of $130,717 and $136,609 at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively) | 133,435 | 137,953 | ||||||
Total investment securities | 296,812 | 289,507 | ||||||
Other investments | 7,621 | 8,110 | ||||||
Loans held for sale, net | 364,126 | 365,454 | ||||||
Loans receivable, net of deferred fees and costs | 535,704 | 489,896 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (6,432 | ) | (5,878 | ) | ||||
Loans receivable, net | 529,272 | 484,018 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net | 17,383 | 15,531 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset | 3,559 | 3,238 | ||||||
Goodwill and intangibles, net | 14,645 | 14,694 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable and other assets | 11,309 | 7,616 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,278,356 | $ | 1,211,576 | ||||
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | ||||||||
Deposits | $ | 894,871 | $ | 824,210 | ||||
Other borrowed funds | 188,715 | 201,085 | ||||||
Warehouse financing | — | 30,245 | ||||||
Mortgage funding checks | 74,263 | 46,392 | ||||||
Escrow liabilities | 8,549 | 3,020 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities | 16,228 | 11,519 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 1,182,626 | 1,116,471 |
2005 |
2004 |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Common stock, $1 par value | |||||||||||||
Authorized | 50,000,000 | 50,000,000 | |||||||||||
Issued and outstanding | 18,530,894 | 18,462,597 | 18,531 | 18,463 | |||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 93,260 | 92,868 | |||||||||||
Accumulated deficit | (13,533 | ) | (15,145 | ) | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (2,528 | ) | (1,081 | ) | |||||||||
Total shareholders' equity | 95,730 | 95,105 | |||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 1,278,356 | $ | 1,211,576 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-2
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
2005 |
2004 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interest income: | ||||||||
Loans receivable | $ | 7,280 | $ | 4,728 | ||||
Loans held for sale | 3,358 | — | ||||||
Federal funds sold | 61 | 28 | ||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale | 1,431 | 1,271 | ||||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity | 1,307 | 1,350 | ||||||
Other investments | 54 | 38 | ||||||
Total interest income | 13,491 | 7,415 | ||||||
Interest expense: | ||||||||
Deposits | 4,677 | 2,282 | ||||||
Other borrowed funds | 992 | 300 | ||||||
Total interest expense | 5,669 | 2,582 | ||||||
Net interest income | 7,822 | 4,833 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | 549 | 74 | ||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 7,273 | 4,759 | ||||||
Non-interest income: | ||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts | 280 | 241 | ||||||
Loan service charges | 626 | 195 | ||||||
Investment fee income | 159 | 178 | ||||||
Net gain on sales of loans | 3,581 | 13 | ||||||
Net realized gain on investment securities available-for-sale | — | 241 | ||||||
Management fee income | 524 | — | ||||||
Other income | 13 | 9 | ||||||
Total non-interest income | 5,183 | 877 | ||||||
Non-interest expense: | ||||||||
Salary and benefits | 4,870 | 2,164 | ||||||
Occupancy | 1,046 | 496 | ||||||
Professional fees | 474 | 154 | ||||||
Depreciation | 680 | 310 | ||||||
Data processing | 508 | 195 | ||||||
Telecommunications | 333 | 103 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles | 49 | — | ||||||
Other operating expenses | 2,135 | 1,133 | ||||||
Total non-interest expense | 10,095 | 4,555 | ||||||
Net income before income taxes | 2,361 | 1,081 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes | 749 | 362 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 1,612 | $ | 719 | ||||
Earnings per share—basic | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.04 | ||||
Earnings per share—diluted | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.04 | ||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding—basic | 18,525 | 17,461 | ||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding—diluted | 18,830 | 17,885 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
2005 |
2004 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net income | $ | 1,612 | $ | 719 | ||||
Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investment securities: | ||||||||
Unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the quarter, net of tax | (1,447 | ) | 976 | |||||
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of tax | — | 159 | ||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 165 | $ | 1,536 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
Preferred Shares |
Preferred Stock |
Common Shares |
Common Stock |
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Accumulated Deficit |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Total |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance, December 31, 2003 | 1,364 | $ | 1,364 | 16,377 | $ | 16,377 | $ | 86,790 | $ | (18,614 | ) | $ | (505 | ) | $ | 85,412 | |||||||
Stock options exercised | — | — | 23 | 23 | 66 | — | — | 89 | |||||||||||||||
Public offering shares issued | — | — | 945 | 945 | 5,358 | — | — | 6,303 | |||||||||||||||
Preferred stock converted to common stock | (1,364 | ) | (1,364 | ) | 1,026 | 1,026 | 338 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities available-for-sale | — | — | — | — | — | — | 817 | 817 | |||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | — | — | 719 | — | 719 | |||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2004 | — | $ | — | 18,371 | $ | 18,371 | $ | 92,552 | $ | (17,895 | ) | $ | 312 | $ | 93,340 | ||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2004 | — | $ | — | 18,463 | $ | 18,463 | $ | 92,868 | $ | (15,145 | ) | $ | (1,081 | ) | $ | 95,105 | |||||||
Stock options exercised | — | — | 68 | 68 | 392 | — | — | 460 | |||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities available-for-sale | — | — | — | — | — | — | (1,447 | ) | (1,447 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | — | — | 1,612 | — | 1,612 | |||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2005 | — | $ | — | 18,531 | $ | 18,531 | $ | 93,260 | $ | (13,533 | ) | $ | (2,528 | ) | $ | 95,730 | |||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
2005 |
2004 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,612 | $ | 719 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||
Depreciation | 680 | 310 | ||||||||
Amortization of premiums, discounts and intangibles | 450 | 503 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 549 | 74 | ||||||||
Loans held for sale, net originated and acquired | (883,678 | ) | (2,569 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from the sale of loans held for sale | 885,931 | 1,894 | ||||||||
Gain on sale of loans held for sale | (3,581 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||
Gain on sale of investment securities available-for-sale | — | (241 | ) | |||||||
Increase in accrued interest receivable, other assets, and deferred tax asset | (4,014 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||
Increase in accrued interest payable, escrow liabilities and other liabilities | 10,238 | 172 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 8,187 | 829 | ||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||
Purchase of premises and equipment | (2,532 | ) | (710 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale, maturity and call of investment securities available-for-sale | — | 4,000 | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale, maturity and call of mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale | — | 9,719 | ||||||||
Proceeds from maturity and call of investment securities held-to-maturity | — | 3,490 | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of other investments | 3,609 | 261 | ||||||||
Purchase of investment securities available-for-sale | (12,964 | ) | (4,000 | ) | ||||||
Purchase of mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale | (8,432 | ) | (51,485 | ) | ||||||
Purchase of investment securities held-to-maturity | — | (10,472 | ) | |||||||
Purchase of mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity | — | (8,015 | ) | |||||||
Purchase of other investments | (3,120 | ) | (729 | ) | ||||||
Redemptions of investment securities available-for-sale | 7,183 | 3,602 | ||||||||
Redemptions of investment securities held-to-maturity | 4,319 | 5,389 | ||||||||
Net (increase) decrease in loans receivable | (42,406 | ) | 1,274 | |||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (54,343 | ) | (47,676 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||
Net increase in deposits | 70,661 | 51,802 | ||||||||
Net decrease in other borrowed funds | (10,745 | ) | (7,074 | ) | ||||||
Net decrease in warehouse financing | (30,245 | ) | — | |||||||
Net increase in mortgage funding checks | 27,871 | — | ||||||||
Proceeds from FHLB advances — long term | — | 5,000 | ||||||||
Repayments of FHLB advances — long term | (1,625 | ) | (625 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from public offering | — | 6,303 | ||||||||
Stock options exercised | 460 | 89 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 56,377 | 55,495 | ||||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 10,221 | 8,648 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the quarter | 23,408 | 13,083 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the quarter | $ | 33,629 | $ | 21,731 | ||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | ||||||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest | $ | 5,659 | $ | 2,574 | ||||||
Cash paid for income taxes | 50 | — | ||||||||
Trade dated investment securities available-for-sale | 5,000 | — |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2005
(Unaudited)
Note 1
Organization
Cardinal Financial Corporation (the"Company") was incorporated on November 24, 1997 under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia as a holding company whose activities consist of investment in its wholly owned subsidiaries. The Company opened Cardinal Bank, N.A. (the "Bank") in 1998 and Cardinal Wealth Services, Inc., an investment services subsidiary, in 1999. In 1999, the Company opened two additional banking subsidiaries and, in late 2000, completed an acquisition of Heritage Bancorp, Inc. and its banking subsidiary, The Heritage Bank. These banking subsidiaries were consolidated into the Bank as of March 1, 2002. On April 15, 2004, the Company received approval from the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond to be a financial holding company. Effective July 7, 2004, the Bank acquired George Mason Mortgage, LLC ("GMM"). In December 2004, the Bank converted to a state chartered institution and changed its name to Cardinal Bank.
Basis of Presentation
In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Regulation S-X, Article 10. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. However, all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2005. The unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes to financial statements that are included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "2004 Form 10-K").
Stock-Based Compensation
At March 31, 2005, the Company had two stock-based employee compensation plans, the 1999 Stock Option Plan and the 2002 Equity Compensation Plan. These plans are described more fully in Footnote 18 of the 2004 Form 10-K.
As permitted under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure, which amended SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,the Company has elected to continue to follow the intrinsic value method in accounting for its stock-based employee compensation arrangements as defined by Accounting Principles Board Opinion ("APB") No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations including Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation, an interpretation of APB No. 25. The following
F-7
table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per common share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation.
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||
2005 |
2004 |
|||||||
Net income | $ | 1,612 | $ | 719 | ||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value- based method for all awards, net of tax | (2,212 | ) | (396 | ) | ||||
Pro forma net income (loss) | $ | (600 | ) | $ | 323 | |||
Earnings (loss) per share: | ||||||||
Basic—as reported | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.04 | ||||
Basic—pro forma | (0.03 | ) | 0.01 | |||||
Diluted—as reported | 0.09 | 0.04 | ||||||
Diluted—pro forma | (0.03 | ) | 0.01 |
The weighted average per share fair values of grants made for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 were $6.48 and $2.91, respectively. The fair values of the options granted were estimated as of the grant date using the Black- Scholes option-pricing model based on the following weighted average assumptions:
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2004 |
|||
Estimated option life | 10 years | 10 years | |||
Risk free interest rate | 4.29 | % | 3.99 | % | |
Expected volatility | 43.11 | % | 11.80 | % | |
Expected dividend yield | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % |
There were options to purchase 494,735 shares of common stock granted during the three months ended March 31, 2005. Of those grants, 486,735 immediately vested on the grant date.
Note 2
Segment Information
Prior to July 7, 2004, the Company operated and reported in two business segments, commercial banking and investment services. As of July 7, 2004, the Company began operating in a third business segment, mortgage banking, with the completion of its acquisition of GMM. The commercial banking segment includes both commercial and consumer lending and provides customers such products as commercial loans, real estate loans, and other business financing and consumer loans. In addition, this segment also provides customers with several choices of deposit products including demand deposit accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit. The mortgage banking segment engages primarily
F-8
in the origination and acquisition of residential mortgages for sale into the secondary market on a best efforts basis. The investment services segment provides advisory services to businesses and individuals, including financial planning and retirement/estate planning.
Information about the reportable segments, and reconciliation of this information to the consolidated financial statements at and for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
At and for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005:
|
Commercial Banking |
Mortgage Banking |
Investment Services |
Intersegment Elimination |
Other |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net interest income | $ | 6,742 | $ | 1,311 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (231 | ) | $ | 7,822 | |||||
Provision for loan losses | 549 | — | — | — | — | 549 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest income | 374 | 4,642 | 159 | — | 8 | 5,183 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest expense | 5,593 | 3,952 | 221 | — | 329 | 10,095 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 379 | 579 | (21 | ) | — | (188 | ) | 749 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 595 | $ | 1,422 | $ | (41 | ) | $ | — | $ | (364 | ) | $ | 1,612 | ||||
Total Assets | $ | 1,192,690 | $ | 379,403 | $ | 691 | $ | (411,226 | ) | $ | 116,798 | $ | 1,278,356 |
At and for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004:
|
Commercial Banking |
Mortgage Banking |
Investment Services |
Intersegment Elimination |
Other |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net interest income | $ | 4,800 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 33 | $ | 4,833 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | 74 | — | — | — | — | 74 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest income | 699 | — | 178 | — | — | 877 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest expense | 4,050 | — | 239 | — | 266 | 4,555 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 462 | — | (21 | ) | — | (79 | ) | 362 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 913 | $ | — | $ | (40 | ) | $ | — | $ | (154 | ) | $ | 719 | ||||
Total Assets | $ | 687,543 | $ | — | $ | 741 | $ | (88,338 | ) | $ | 93,505 | $ | 693,451 |
At March 31, 2005, the Company did not have any operating segments other than those reported. Parent company financial information is included in the "Other" category and represents an overhead function rather than an operating segment. The parent company's most significant assets are its net investments in its subsidiaries. The parent company's net interest income is comprised of interest income from short-term investments and interest expense on trust preferred securities.
F-9
Note 3
Earnings Per Share
The following is the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. Stock options outstanding at March 31, 2005 and 2004 were 1,661,055 and 1,108,835, respectively. Stock options issued that were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise prices were greater than the average market price were 7,094 and 10,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data) |
||||||
2005 |
2004 |
|||||
Net income to common shareholders | $ | 1,612 | $ | 719 | ||
Weighted average shares—basic | 18,524,847 | 17,460,989 | ||||
Weighted average shares—diluted | 18,830,265 | 17,884,580 | ||||
Earnings per share—basic | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.04 | ||
Earnings per share—diluted | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.04 |
Note 4
Derivatives
We account for our derivatives and hedging activities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity, as amended by SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, and SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
The Company utilizes forward sales commitments to economically hedge the interest rate risk inherent in entering into interest rate lock loan commitments and originating fixed-rate closed loans for sale through GMM. At March 31, 2005, the fair value of interest rate lock commitments with a notional value of $203 million was $(517,000), and the fair value of forward sale commitments with a notional value of $500 million was $2.4 million. These derivatives are recorded in other assets and other liabilities on the consolidated statements of condition at their fair values. In addition to these market adjustments for open interest rate lock loan commitments and forward sale commitments, at March 31, 2005, a basis adjustment of $(1.9 million) has been recorded related to the closed loans held for sale and is included in loans held for sale, net in the consolidated statements of condition.
Note 5
Subsequent Event
On April 29, 2005, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange with Wilson/Bennett Capital Management, Inc., an asset management firm based in Alexandria, Virginia. John W. Fisher, a member of the Company's Board of Directors, is the founder and President and Chief Investment Officer of Wilson/Bennett and owns 90% of Wilson/Bennett. Under the terms the Agreement, the Company plans to acquire Wilson/Bennett from Mr. Fisher and James Moloney, the
F-10
other shareholder of Wilson/Bennett, for approximately $6.6 million in a combination of common stock and cash. The cash portion of the transaction will be approximately $1.1 million.
The closing of the transaction is subject to all necessary regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions. In addition, the closing of the transaction is also subject to the conditions that clients of Wilson/Bennett representing at least 75% of the assets under management have consented to the transaction, that the Company enters into an employment agreement with Mr. Fisher and that Wilson/Bennett obtain, at the Company's expense, a term life insurance policy on the life of Mr. Fisher in an amount of no less than $3,000,000. The Company will be the beneficiary under that policy. The Company expects that, if the conditions are satisfied, the transaction will close early in the third quarter of 2005. At that time, Wilson/Bennett will become a subsidiary of the Company.
F-11
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cardinal Financial Corporation and subsidiaries:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of condition of Cardinal Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 11, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on management's assessment of, and an adverse opinion on the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting. The Company acquired George Mason Mortgage, LLC (GMM) during 2004, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, GMM's internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of $392.2 million and pre-tax income of $2.1 million included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of George Mason Mortgage, LLC.
/s/ KPMG LLP
McLean,
Virginia
March 11, 2005
F-12
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
December 31, 2004 and 2003
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
|
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 15,205 | $ | 9,555 | ||||
Federal funds sold | 8,203 | 3,528 | ||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents | 23,408 | 13,083 | ||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale | 151,554 | 130,762 | ||||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity (market value of $136,609 and $141,630 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively) |
137,953 | 142,852 | ||||||
Total investment securities | 289,507 | 273,614 | ||||||
Other investments | 8,110 | 3,517 | ||||||
Loans held for sale at lower of cost or market, net | 365,454 | — | ||||||
Loans receivable, net of deferred fees and costs | 489,896 | 336,002 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (5,878 | ) | (4,344 | ) | ||||
Loans receivable, net | 484,018 | 331,658 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net | 15,531 | 6,707 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset | 3,238 | 4,473 | ||||||
Goodwill and intangibles, net | 14,694 | 22 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable and other assets | 7,616 | 3,174 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,211,576 | $ | 636,248 | ||||
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | ||||||||
Deposits | $ | 824,210 | $ | 474,129 | ||||
Other borrowed funds | 201,085 | 74,457 | ||||||
Warehouse financing | 30,245 | — | ||||||
Mortgage funding checks | 46,392 | — | ||||||
Escrow liabilities | 3,020 | — | ||||||
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities | 11,519 | 2,250 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 1,116,471 | 550,836 | ||||||
Preferred stock, $1 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; Series A preferred stock, cumulative convertible, 0 and 1,364,062 shares outstanding in 2004 and 2003, respectively | — | 1,364 |
Common stock, $1 par value | 2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
Authorized | 50,000,000 | 50,000,000 | |||||||
Issued and outstanding | 18,462,597 | 16,377,337 | 18,463 | 16,377 |
Additional paid-in capital | 92,868 | 86,790 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (15,145 | ) | (18,614 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (1,081 | ) | (505 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders' equity | 95,105 | 85,412 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 1,211,576 | $ | 636,248 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-13
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands, except per
share data)
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interest income: | ||||||||||||
Loans receivable | $ | 21,875 | $ | 16,851 | $ | 14,798 | ||||||
Loans held for sale | 6,814 | — | — | |||||||||
Federal funds sold | 130 | 107 | 871 | |||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale | 5,830 | 5,026 | 4,501 | |||||||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity | 5,622 | 2,483 | — | |||||||||
Other investments | 251 | 135 | 72 | |||||||||
Total interest income | 40,522 | 24,602 | 20,242 | |||||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||||
Deposits | 12,694 | 8,656 | 9,364 | |||||||||
Other borrowed funds | 3,047 | 773 | 222 | |||||||||
Warehouse financing | 228 | — | — | |||||||||
Total interest expense | 15,969 | 9,429 | 9,586 | |||||||||
Net interest income | 24,553 | 15,173 | 10,656 | |||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 1,626 | 1,001 | 444 | |||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 22,927 | 14,172 | 10,212 | |||||||||
Non-interest income: |
||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts | 1,089 | 918 | 852 | |||||||||
Loan service charges | 958 | 382 | 392 | |||||||||
Investment fee income | 657 | 785 | 940 | |||||||||
Net gain (loss) on sales of loans | 4,696 | 282 | 74 | |||||||||
Net realized gain on investment securities available-for-sale | 245 | 1,364 | 524 | |||||||||
Net gain on sales of assets | (1 | ) | — | 39 | ||||||||
Management fee income | 1,749 | — | — | |||||||||
Other income | 16 | 98 | 43 | |||||||||
Total non-interest income | 9,409 | 3,829 | 2,864 | |||||||||
Non-interest expense: |
||||||||||||
Salary and benefits | 13,354 | 6,797 | 5,715 | |||||||||
Occupancy | 2,897 | 1,559 | 972 | |||||||||
Professional fees | 1,610 | 1,113 | 1,011 | |||||||||
Depreciation | 1,838 | 1,030 | 736 | |||||||||
Data Processing | 969 | 835 | 759 | |||||||||
Telecommunications | 611 | 396 | 276 | |||||||||
Writedown on corporate bond | — | — | 1,660 | |||||||||
Amortization of intangibles | 49 | — | 22 | |||||||||
Other operating expenses | 5,826 | 3,625 | 2,454 | |||||||||
Total non-interest expense | 27,154 | 15,355 | 13,605 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) before income taxes | 5,182 | 2,646 | (529 | ) | ||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 1,713 | (3,508 | ) | — | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 3,469 | $ | 6,154 | $ | (529 | ) | |||||
Dividends to preferred shareholders | — | 495 | 495 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) to common shareholders | $ | 3,469 | $ | 5,659 | $ | (1,024 | ) | |||||
Earnings (loss) per common share—basic | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.55 | $ | (0.13 | ) | |||||
Earnings (loss) per common share—diluted | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.54 | $ | (0.13 | ) | |||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding—basic | 18,448 | 10,218 | 7,949 | |||||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding—diluted | 18,705 | 11,468 | 7,949 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-14
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net income (loss) | $ | 3,469 | $ | 6,154 | $ | (529 | ) | |||||
Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale investment securities: | ||||||||||||
Unrealized holding loss arising during the year, net of tax | (412 | ) | (1,950 | ) | 3,143 | |||||||
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (loss), net of tax | 164 | 900 | 524 | |||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 2,893 | $ | 3,304 | $ | 2,090 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-15
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(In
thousands)
|
Preferred Shares |
Preferred Stock |
Common Shares |
Common Stock |
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Accumulated Deficit |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Total |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance, December 31, 2001 | 1,365 | $ | 1,365 | 4,294 | $ | 4,294 | $ | 38,488 | $ | (23,249 | ) | $ | (274 | ) | $ | 20,624 | |||||||
Rights offering shares issued | — | — | 2,437 | 2,437 | 5,462 | — | — | 7,899 | |||||||||||||||
Public offering shares issued | — | — | 3,313 | 3,313 | 7,281 | — | — | 10,594 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends on preferred stock | — | — | — | — | — | (495 | ) | — | (495 | ) | |||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities available-for-sale | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,619 | 2,619 | |||||||||||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | — | — | (529 | ) | — | (529 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2002 |
1,365 |
$ |
1,365 |
10,044 |
$ |
10,044 |
$ |
51,231 |
$ |
(24,273 |
) |
$ |
2,345 |
$ |
40,712 |
||||||||
Stock options exercised | — | — | 32 | 32 | 112 | — | — | 144 | |||||||||||||||
Preferred stock converted to common stock | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Public offering shares issued | — | — | 6,300 | 6,300 | 35,447 | — | — | 41,747 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends on preferred stock | — | — | — | — | — | (495 | ) | — | (495 | ) | |||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities available-for-sale, net of tax | — | — | — | — | — | — | (2,850 | ) | (2,850 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | — | — | 6,154 | — | 6,154 | |||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
1,364 |
$ |
1,364 |
16,377 |
$ |
16,377 |
$ |
86,790 |
$ |
(18,614 |
) |
$ |
(505 |
) |
$ |
85,412 |
|||||||
Stock options exercised | — | — | 115 | 115 | 383 | — | — | 498 | |||||||||||||||
Public offering shares issued | — | — | 945 | 945 | 5,357 | — | — | 6,302 | |||||||||||||||
Preferred stock converted to common stock | (1,364 | ) | (1,364 | ) | 1,026 | 1,026 | 338 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities available-for-sale, net of tax | — | — | — | — | — | — | (576 | ) | (576 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | — | — | 3,469 | — | 3,469 | |||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
— |
$ |
— |
18,463 |
$ |
18,463 |
$ |
92,868 |
$ |
(15,145 |
) |
$ |
(1,081 |
) |
$ |
95,105 |
|||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-16
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 3,469 | $ | 6,154 | $ | (529 | ) | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation | 1,838 | 1,030 | 736 | |||||||||||
Amortization of premiums, discounts and intangibles | 2,025 | 2,137 | 1,120 | |||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 1,626 | 1,001 | 444 | |||||||||||
Loans held for sale originated and acquired | (2,181,655 | ) | (32,697 | ) | (4,369 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of loans held for sale | 1,820,897 | 32,979 | 9,175 | |||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans held for sale | (4,696 | ) | (282 | ) | (74 | ) | ||||||||
Writedown on corporate bond | — | — | 1,660 | |||||||||||
Gain on sale of investment securities available-for-sale | (245 | ) | (1,364 | ) | (524 | ) | ||||||||
Gain on sale of other assets | (1 | ) | — | (39 | ) | |||||||||
(Increase) decrease in goodwill and intangibles, net | (14,672 | ) | 624 | — | ||||||||||
Increase in accrued interest receivable, other assets, and deferred tax asset | (3,207 | ) | (1,297 | ) | (4,924 | ) | ||||||||
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest payable, escrow liabilities and other liabilities | 12,289 | (17,882 | ) | 17,020 | ||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | (362,332 | ) | (9,597 | ) | 19,696 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||||
Purchase of premises and equipment | (10,666 | ) | (2,795 | ) | (601 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale, maturity and call of investment securities available-for-sale | 14,000 | 50,666 | 21,928 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sale, maturity and call of mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale | 9,719 | 46,948 | 20,106 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from maturity and call of investment securities held-to-maturity | 9,985 | — | — | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of other investments | 9,558 | 1,831 | 188 | |||||||||||
Purchase of investment securities available-for-sale | (6,000 | ) | (43,066 | ) | (58,087 | ) | ||||||||
Purchase of mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale | (72,959 | ) | (223,505 | ) | (139,168 | ) | ||||||||
Purchase of investment securities held-to-maturity | (16,472 | ) | (2,998 | ) | — | |||||||||
Purchase of mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity | (14,042 | ) | (5,023 | ) | — | |||||||||
Purchase of other investments | (13,528 | ) | (3,733 | ) | (535 | ) | ||||||||
Redemptions of investment securities available-for-sale | 30,525 | 41,805 | 25,564 | |||||||||||
Redemptions of investment securities held-to-maturity | 26,452 | 21,340 | — | |||||||||||
Net cash acquired in acquisition | 1,778 | — | — | |||||||||||
Net increase in loans receivable | (155,219 | ) | (86,664 | ) | (47,808 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (186,869 | ) | (205,194 | ) | (178,413 | ) | ||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||||
Net increase in deposits | 350,081 | 50,650 | 177,455 | |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in other borrowed funds | 62,008 | 25,499 | (24 | ) | ||||||||||
Net increase in warehouse financing | 30,245 | — | — | |||||||||||
Net increase in mortgage funding checks | 46,392 | — | — | |||||||||||
Proceeds from FHLB advances—long term | 52,500 | 59,000 | 1,000 | |||||||||||
Repayments of FHLB advances—long term | (8,500 | ) | (12,042 | ) | (8,800 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from rights offering | — | — | 7,899 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from public offering | 6,302 | 41,747 | 10,594 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from trust preferred issuance | 20,000 | — | — | |||||||||||
Stock options exercised | 498 | 144 | — | |||||||||||
Dividends on preferred stock | — | (495 | ) | (495 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 559,526 | 164,503 | 187,629 | |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 10,325 | (50,288 | ) | 28,912 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 13,083 | 63,371 | 34,459 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 23,408 | $ | 13,083 | $ | 63,371 | ||||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | ||||||||||||||
Cash paid during year for interest | $ | 15,124 | $ | 9,380 | $ | 9,491 | ||||||||
Cash paid for income taxes | 135 | 80 | — | |||||||||||
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities: | ||||||||||||||
The Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding membership interests of George Mason Mortgage, LLC for $17.0 million. In conjunction with the acquisition, liabilities were assumed as follows: |
||||||||||||||
Fair value of assets acquired | $ | 355,232 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill and intangibles | 14,703 | |||||||||||||
Cash paid | (17,000 | ) | ||||||||||||
Fair value of liabilities assumed | $ | 352,935 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-17
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Organization
Cardinal Financial Corporation (the "Company") was incorporated November 24, 1997 under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia as a holding company whose activities consist of investment in its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Company opened Cardinal Bank, N.A. (the "Bank") in 1998 and Cardinal Wealth Services, Inc., an investment services subsidiary, in 1999. In 1999, the Company opened two additional banking subsidiaries and, in late 2000, completed an acquisition of Heritage Bancorp, Inc. and its banking subsidiary, The Heritage Bank ("Heritage"). These banking subsidiaries were consolidated into the Bank as of March 1, 2002. On April 15, 2004, the Company received approval from the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond to be a financial holding company. Effective July 7, 2004, the Bank acquired George Mason Mortgage, LLC ("GMM") from United Bank—Virginia, a wholly owned subsidiary of United Bankshares, Inc. In December 2004, Cardinal Bank, N.A. converted to a state chartered institution and changed its name to Cardinal Bank.
On July 7, 2004, the Bank acquired George Mason Mortgage LLC ("George Mason" or "GMM") in a cash transaction for $17.0 million. This transaction resulted in the recognition of $12.9 million of goodwill and $1.7 million of other intangibles. This transaction was accounted for as a purchase, and GMM's assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value as of the purchase date. GMM's operating results are included in the consolidated results since the date of the acquisition. GMM, based in Fairfax, Virginia, engages primarily in the origination and acquisition of residential mortgages for sale into the secondary market on a best efforts basis through eight branches located throughout the metropolitan Washington region. GMM has approximately 200 employees and does business in eight states, including Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia. GMM's primary sources of revenue include net interest income earned on loans held for sale, gain on the sale of loans held for sale and contractual management fees earned relating to the management of other entities' activities. Loans are made pursuant to purchase commitments and are sold servicing released.
In July 2004, the Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, Cardinal Statutory Trust I, for the purpose of issuing $20.0 million of floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures ("trust preferred securities"). These trust preferred securities are due in 2034 and have an interest rate of LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) plus 2.40%, which adjusts quarterly. These securities are redeemable at a premium through March 2008 and at par thereafter. The Company has guaranteed payment of these securities. The $20.6 million payable by the Company to Cardinal Statutory Trust I is included in other borrowed funds in the Consolidated Statements of Condition since Cardinal Statutory Trust I is an unconsolidated subsidiary as the Company is not the primary beneficiary of this entity. The Company utilized the proceeds from the issuance of the trust preferred securities to make a capital contribution into the Bank.
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
U.S. generally-accepted accounting principles are complex and require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and contingent liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The accounting policies we view as critical are those relating to judgments, assumptions and estimates regarding the accounting
F-18
for business combinations, the determination of the allowance for loan losses, accounting for economic hedging activities, and the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The acquisition of GMM was accounted for as a purchase as required by SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. The purchase accounting method requires that the cost of an acquired entity be allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The difference between the fair values and the purchase price is recorded as goodwill. In addition, SFAS No. 141 requires that identified intangible assets acquired in a business combination must be separately valued and recognized on the balance sheet if they meet certain requirements.
For the purpose of presentation in the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company has defined cash and cash equivalents as those amounts included in cash, due from banks, and federal funds sold.
The Company classifies its debt and marketable equity securities in one of two categories: available-for-sale or held-to-maturity. Held-to-maturity securities are those securities for which the Company has the ability and intent to hold until maturity. All other securities are classified as available-for-sale.
Held to maturity securities are carried at amortized cost. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses, net of tax if applicable, on available-for-sale securities are reported in other comprehensive income (loss).
Gains and losses on the sale of securities are determined using the specific identification method. Declines in the fair value of individual held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed other than temporary are charged to earnings as realized losses, resulting in the establishment of a new cost basis for the security.
Premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the effective interest method over the period to maturity. Prepayment of the mortgages securing the mortgage-backed securities may affect the maturity date and yield to maturity. The Company uses actual principal prepayment experience and estimates of future principal prepayments in calculating the yield necessary to apply the effective interest method.
Loans originated and intended for sale into the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value on an aggregate loan basis as determined by outstanding commitments from investors and changes in fair value due to changes in interest rates. Net
F-19
unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to operations. Carrying amount includes unpaid principal balances, valuation allowances, origination premiums or discounts, and origination fees and direct costs that are deferred at the time of origination.
Loans receivable that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off are reported at their outstanding principal balance adjusted for any charge-offs, and net of the allowance for loan losses and any deferred fees or costs. Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are capitalized and amortized as an adjustment of the yield using the payment terms required by the loan contract.
Loans are placed in nonaccrual status when they are past-due 90 days as to either principal or interest or when, in the opinion of management, the collection of principal and interest is in doubt. A loan remains in nonaccrual status until the loan is current as to payment of both principal and interest or past-due less than 90 days, and the borrower demonstrates the ability to pay and remain current. Loans are charged-off when a loan or a portion thereof is considered uncollectible. When cash payments are received, they are applied to principal first, then to accrued interest. It is the Company's policy not to record interest income on nonaccrual loans until principal is current.
The Company determines and recognizes impairment of certain loans when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. A loan is not considered impaired during a period of delay in payment if the Company expects to collect all amounts due, including past-due interest. An impaired loan is measured at the present value of its expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's coupon rate, or at the loan's observable market price or fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
The allowance for loan losses is increased by provisions for loan losses and decreased by charge-offs (net of recoveries). Management's periodic determination of the allowance is based on the Company's past loan loss experience, adverse situations that may affect the borrower's ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, and current economic conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company's allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. Management believes that the current allowance for loan losses is a reasonable estimate of known and inherent losses in the current loan portfolio.
Land is carried at cost. Premises, furniture, equipment, and leasehold improvements are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation of premises, furniture and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives from 3 to 25 years. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the useful lives of the improvements or the lease term, whichever is shorter.
F-20
Goodwill, which represents the excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired, is not amortized but is evaluated at least annually for impairment by comparing its fair value with its recorded amount and is written-down when appropriate. In addition to goodwill, the Company has amortizable intangible assets as a result of the GMM acquisition. These intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated lives. Additional information on the Company's goodwill and intangible assets can be found in Note 23.
Gains or losses on the sale of loans are recognized at the date of settlement and are based on the difference between the selling price and the carrying value of the related loans sold. Fees and direct costs originally deferred that are associated with the origination of the loans held for sale are recognized as an adjustment to the gain on sale when the loans are sold.
Management fee income represents income earned for the management and operational support provided by GMM to other mortgage banking companies (the "managed companies"). The relationship of GMM to these managed companies is solely as a mortgage banking advisor. There are no fiduciary or other special relationships with regard to each of the managed companies. Fees earned by GMM are accrued based on contractual arrangements with each of the managed companies.
Investment fee income represents commissions paid by customers of Cardinal Wealth Services, Inc. for investment transactions. Fees are generally recognized in income as they are earned.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes.
Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the periods. Diluted earnings per share reflects the impact of dilutive potential common shares that would have been outstanding if common stock equivalents had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance. Common stock equivalents that may be issued by the Company relate solely to outstanding stock options, and the dilutive potential common shares resulting from outstanding stock options are determined using the treasury stock method. Common stock equivalents outstanding at December 31, 2002 were antidilutive and consequently, not included in the loss per common share calculation.
F-21
The Company accounts for its derivatives and hedging activities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity, as amended by SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities and SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into contractual commitments, including loan commitments and rate lock commitments to finance residential mortgages. These commitments, which contain fixed expiration dates, offer the borrower an interest rate guarantee provided the loan meets underwriting guidelines and closes within the timeframe established by the Company. Interest rate risk arises on these commitments and subsequently closed loans if interest rates move between the time of the interest rate lock and the delivery of the loan to the investor. Loan commitments related to mortgage loans that are intended to be sold are considered derivatives in accordance with the guidance of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105, Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments. Accordingly, the fair value of these derivatives at the end of the reporting period has been determined through an analysis of changes in market interest rates from the interest rate lock date and the loan closing date.
To mitigate the effect of the interest rate risk inherent in providing loan commitments, the Company economically hedges its commitments by entering into best efforts delivery forward loan sale contracts. These forward contracts are marked to market through earnings and are not designated as accounting hedges under SFAS No. 133. The change in the fair value of loan commitments and the change in the fair value of forward sales contracts generally move in opposite directions and, accordingly, the impact of changes in these valuations on net income during the loan commitment period is generally inconsequential.
Although the forward loan sale contracts also serve as an economic hedge of loans held for sale, forward contracts have not been designated as accounting hedges under SFAS No. 133 and, accordingly, loans held for sale are accounted for at the lower of cost or market in accordance with SFAS No. 65, Accounting for Certain Mortgage Banking Activities.
The Company applies the intrinsic value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations, in accounting for its fixed plan stock options. As such, compensation expense is recorded only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price on the date of grant.
At December 31, 2004, the Company had two stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in Footnote 16. As permitted under SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure, which amended SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the Company has elected to continue to follow the intrinsic value method in accounting for its stock-based employee compensation arrangement
F-22
as defined by Accounting Principles Board Opinion ("APB") No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations including Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation, an interpretation of APB No. 25. The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per common share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation.
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
||||||||||
Net income (loss) to common shareholders as reported |
$ | 3,469 | $ | 5,659 | $ | (1,024 | ) | |||||
Deduct: Total stock based employee compensation expense determined under fair value-based method for all awards | (1,427 | ) | (547 | ) | (265 | ) | ||||||
Pro forma net income (loss) |
$ |
2,042 |
$ |
5,112 |
$ |
(1,289 |
) |
|||||
Earnings (loss) per common share: | ||||||||||||
Basic—as reported | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.55 | $ | (0.13 | ) | |||||
Basic—pro forma | 0.11 | 0.50 | (0.16 | ) | ||||||||
Diluted—as reported | 0.19 | 0.54 | (0.13 | ) | ||||||||
Diluted—pro forma | 0.11 | 0.45 | (0.16 | ) | ||||||||
The weighted average per share fair values of grants made in 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $3.11, $2.13 and $2.12, respectively. The fair values of the options granted were estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the following weighted-average assumptions: |
|
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimated option life | 10 years | 10 years | 10 years | |||||
Risk free interest rate | 4.07% | 3.98% | 4.25% | |||||
Expected volatility | 11.8% | 11.8% | 20.4% | |||||
Expected dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Certain amounts for 2003 and 2002 have been reclassified to conform to the presentation for 2004.
(3) Business Combinations
Effective July 7, 2004, the Bank completed its acquisition of GMM from United Bank—Virginia, a wholly owned subsidiary of United Bankshares, Inc. GMM was acquired in a cash transaction for $17.0 million and is operating as a subsidiary of the Bank. This transaction was accounted for as a purchase and GMM's assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value as of the purchase date. GMM's
F-23
operating results are included in the consolidated results since the date of acquisition. This transaction resulted in the recognition of $12.9 million of goodwill and $1.7 million of other intangible assets. During the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company reallocated a part of goodwill as previously reported to other intangible assets as a result of a study by an independent valuation consultant. GMM's primary sources of revenue include net interest income earned on loans held for sale, gain on sale of loans and management fees earned. Loans are made pursuant to purchase commitments and are sold servicing released. The Bank purchased GMM primarily to diversify its sources of income, increase non-interest income and to be a source of residential loans for its portfolio.
The following presents the condensed statement of condition of George Mason Mortgage, LLC at July 7, 2004, the date of acquisition:
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CONDITION
(Dollars in thousands)
Assets | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
1,778 |
||
Loans held for sale, net | 339,643 | |||
Loans receivable, net | 429 | |||
Premises and equipment, net | 2,289 | |||
Other assets | 7,784 | |||
Total assets | $ | 351,923 | ||
Liabilities and Shareholder Equity |
||||
Warehouse financing |
$ |
335,584 |
||
Other liabilities | 16,339 | |||
Total liabilities | 351,923 | |||
Total shareholder equity |
— |
|||
Total liabilities and shareholder equity | $ | 351,923 | ||
F-24
The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information presents the results of operations of the Company as if GMM had been acquired on January 1, 2003.
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003 |
||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|||||
Net interest income | $ | 28,674 | $ | 27,506 | ||
Non-interest income | 28,254 | 33,275 | ||||
Provision for loan losses | 1,627 | 1,000 | ||||
Non-interest expense | 45,019 | 36,701 | ||||
Net income before income taxes | 10,282 | 23,080 | ||||
Provision for income taxes | 3,228 | 2,237 | ||||
Net income | $ | 7,054 | $ | 20,843 | ||
Earnings per common share — basic | $ | 0.38 | $ | 2.04 | ||
Earnings per common share — diluted | $ | 0.38 | $ | 1.82 | ||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding — basic | 18,448 | 10,218 | ||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding — diluted | 18,705 | 11,468 | ||||
The 2003 pro forma tax expense of $2.2 million includes the impact of a $3.5 million tax benefit associated with Cardinal Financial Corporation's recognition of deferred tax assets since the Company determined that it was more likely than not that these assets would be utilized.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the excess cost of the acquisition to the Company over the fair value of net assets acquired from GMM.
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cash paid by the Company | $ | 17,000 | ||
Identifiable intangible assets | (1,781 | ) | ||
Fair value of loans held for sale | (1,204 | ) | ||
Fair value of construction to permanent loans held for sale | (235 | ) | ||
Fair value of unfunded commitments | (455 | ) | ||
Fair value of reserve for loan losses | (397 | ) | ||
Fair value of management fee accrual | (130 | ) | ||
Merger costs | 143 | |||
Goodwill | $ | 12,941 | ||
Goodwill will be deductible for federal income tax purposes over a fifteen year period. The federal income tax deduction attributable to goodwill in each of the next five years will be $863,000.
F-25
(4) Investment Securities and Other Investments
The fair value and amortized cost of investment securities at December 31, 2004 and 2003 are shown below.
|
2004 |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Amortized cost |
Gross Unrealized Gains |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
Fair value |
|||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale | |||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies and enterprises |
$ | 6,000 | $ | 9 | $ | (53 | ) | $ | 5,956 | ||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 145,300 | 121 | (1,841 | ) | 143,580 | ||||||||
Treasury bonds | 2,031 | — | (13 | ) | 2,018 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 153,331 | $ | 130 | $ | (1,907 | ) | $ | 151,554 | ||||
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity | |||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies and enterprises |
$ | 25,517 | $ | 21 | $ | (248 | ) | $ | 25,290 | ||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 104,431 | 222 | (1,256 | ) | 103,397 | ||||||||
Corporate bonds | 8,005 | 5 | (88 | ) | 7,922 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 137,953 | $ | 248 | $ | (1,592 | ) | $ | 136,609 | ||||
|
2003 |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Amortized cost |
Gross Unrealized Gains |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
Fair value |
|||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale | |||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies and enterprises |
$ | 6,000 | $ | 66 | $ | (37 | ) | $ | 6,029 | ||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 113,480 | 304 | (1,113 | ) | 112,671 | ||||||||
Corporate bonds | 10,000 | — | (5 | ) | 9,995 | ||||||||
Treasury bonds | 2,047 | 20 | — | 2,067 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 131,527 | $ | 390 | $ | (1,155 | ) | $ | 130,762 | ||||
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity | |||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies and enterprises |
$ | 16,992 | $ | 9 | $ | (216 | ) | $ | 16,785 | ||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 117,860 | 266 | (1,129 | ) | 116,997 | ||||||||
Corporate bonds | 8,000 | — | (152 | ) | 7,848 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 142,852 | $ | 275 | $ | (1,497 | ) | $ | 141,630 | ||||
F-26
The fair value and amortized cost of available-for-sale securities by contractual maturity at December 31, 2004 is shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because many issuers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
Available-for-Sale |
Held-to-Maturity |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Amortized cost |
Fair Value |
Amortized cost |
Fair Value |
|||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||
After 1 year but within 5 years | $ | 5,031 | $ | 4,965 | $ | 6,500 | $ | 6,427 | |||||
After 5 years but within 10 years | 3,000 | 3,009 | 16,018 | 15,901 | |||||||||
After 10 years | — | — | 11,004 | 10,884 | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 145,300 | 143,580 | 104,431 | 103,397 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 153,331 | $ | 151,554 | $ | 137,953 | $ | 136,609 | |||||
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale amounted to approximately $25.0 million, $68.9 million, and $31.3 million, respectively. Gross realized gains in 2004, 2003 and 2002 amounted to approximately $250,000, $1.4 million and $544,000, respectively. Gross realized losses during 2004, 2003 and 2002 amounted to approximately $5,000, $0, and $20,000, respectively.
The table below shows the Company's investment securities' gross unrealized losses and their fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2004.
|
Less than 12 months |
12 months or more |
Total |
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale |
Fair Value |
Unrealized loss |
Fair Value |
Unrealized loss |
Fair Value |
Unrealized loss |
|||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government — sponsored agencies and enterprises | $ | 1,979 | $ | (21 | ) | $ | 967 | $ | (33 | ) | $ | 2,946 | $ | (54 | ) | ||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 87,862 | (1,024 | ) | 37,720 | (816 | ) | 125,582 | (1,840 | ) | ||||||||||
Treasury bonds | 2,018 | (13 | ) | — | — | 2,018 | (13 | ) | |||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired securities | $ | 91,859 | $ | (1,058 | ) | $ | 38,687 | $ | (849 | ) | $ | 130,546 | $ | (1,907 | ) | ||||
Less than 12 months |
12 months or more |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale |
Fair Value |
Unrealized loss |
Fair Value |
Unrealized loss |
Fair Value |
Unrealized loss |
|||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government—sponsored agencies and enterprises | $ | 14,844 | $ | (155 | ) | $ | 3,906 | $ | (93 | ) | $ | 18,750 | $ | (248 | ) | ||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 33,993 | (335 | ) | 38,236 | (922 | ) | 72,229 | (1,257 | ) | ||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 3,980 | (20 | ) | 1,933 | (67 | ) | 5,913 | (87 | ) | ||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired securities | $ | 52,817 | $ | (510 | ) | $ | 44,075 | $ | (1,082 | ) | $ | 96,892 | $ | (1,592 | ) | ||||
F-27
Investment securities with unrealized losses are all investment grade and the unrealized losses are a result of the economic environment of 2004. Investment securities with unrealized losses have interest rates that are less than the current interest rate environment and not a result of impairment. Mortgage-backed investment securities, which reflect most of the unrealized losses in the investment securities portfolio, are primarily comprised of bonds issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) and Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), and are supported by pools of residential mortgage loans.
Investment securities that were pledged to secure other borrowed funds at December 31, 2004 and 2003 had carrying value of $279.0 million and $177.5 million, respectively, and are used to secure the following:
|
2004 |
2003 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|||||
FHLB advances | $ | 169,133 | $ | 70,100 | ||
Repurchase agreements | 42,099 | 102,404 | ||||
Debtor in possession and public deposits | ||||||
and TT&L payments | 18,953 | 5,000 | ||||
FRB discount window and TT&L note option | 47,063 | — | ||||
$ | 277,248 | $ | 177,504 | |||
Other investments at December 31, 2004 include $7.4 million of Federal Home Loan Bank stock, and $63,000 of Community Bankers' Bank stock. As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, the Company's banking subsidiary is required to hold stock in this entity. Stock membership in Community Bankers' Bank allows the Company to participate in loan purchases or sales including participations. In addition, included in other investments is the Company's $619,000 investment in Cardinal Statutory Trust I. These investments are carried at cost since no active trading markets exist.
(5) Loans Receivable
The loan portfolio at December 31, 2004 and 2003 consisted of the following:
|
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 56,512 | $ | 57,854 | ||||
Real estate—commercial | 220,012 | 139,725 | ||||||
Real estate—construction | 69,535 | 42,243 | ||||||
Real estate—residential | 76,932 | 42,495 | ||||||
Home equity lines | 60,408 | 43,176 | ||||||
Consumer | 6,816 | 10,690 | ||||||
490,215 | 336,183 | |||||||
Net deferred fees | (319 | ) | (181 | ) | ||||
Loans receivable, net of fees | 489,896 | 336,002 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (5,878 | ) | (4,344 | ) | ||||
Loans receivable, net | $ | 484,018 | $ | 331,658 | ||||
F-28
Most of the Company's loans, commitments and standby letters of credit have been granted to customers located in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. The concentrations of credit by type of loan are set forth above. As a matter of regulatory restriction, the Company's banking subsidiary limits the amount of credit extended to any single borrower or group of related borrowers. Loans in process at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $423,000 and $172,000.
An analysis of the change in the allowance for loan losses follows:
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|||||||||
Balance, beginning of year | $ | 4,344 | $ | 3,372 | $ | 3,104 | ||||
Provision for loan losses | 1,626 | 1,001 | 444 | |||||||
Transfer to liability on unfunded commitments | — | — | (74 | ) | ||||||
Loans charged off | (108 | ) | (80 | ) | (117 | ) | ||||
Recoveries | 16 | 51 | 15 | |||||||
Balance, end of year | $ | 5,878 | $ | 4,344 | $ | 3,372 | ||||
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company had impaired loans of $547,000 and $390,000, respectively, which were on nonaccrual status. These impairments had valuation allowances of $207,000 and $166,000 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The average balance of impaired loans was $298,000, $654,000 and $568,000 for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Interest income that would have been recorded had these loans been performing was $25,000 for 2004, $39,000 for 2003 and $37,000 for 2002. The interest income realized prior to the loans being placed on non-accrual status for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $21,000, $1,000 and $28,000 respectively.
(6) Loans Held for Sale, Net
The loans held for sale portfolio at December 31, 2004 consists of the following:
|
2004 |
||
---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||
Residential | $ | 293,739 | |
Construction-to-permanent | 69,507 | ||
363,246 | |||
2,208 | |||
Net deferred costs | $ | 365,454 | |
There were no loans held for sale at December 31, 2003. The Company had a related recourse liability reserve of $75,000 at December 31, 2004 for loans that have been sold.
F-29
(7) Premises and Equipment
Components of premises and equipment at December 31, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:
|
2004 |
2003 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||
Land | $ | 2,748 | $ | 1,024 | |||
Building | 4,725 | 1,472 | |||||
Furniture and equipment | 9,648 | 5,322 | |||||
Leasehold improvements | 3,908 | 2,618 | |||||
Total cost | 21,029 | 10,436 | |||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | 5,498 | 3,729 | |||||
Premises and equipment, net | $ | 15,531 | $ | 6,707 | |||
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $1.8 million, $1.0 million, and $736,000, respectively.
The Company has entered into leases for office space over various terms. The leases are subject to annual increases as well as allocations of real estate taxes and certain operating expenses.
Minimum future rental payments under the non-cancelable operating leases, as of December 31, 2004 are as follows:
Year ending December 31, |
Amount |
||
---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||
2005 | $ | 3,887 | |
2006 | 3,889 | ||
2007 | 3,158 | ||
2008 | 2,201 | ||
2009 | 1,654 | ||
Thereafter | 1,467 | ||
$ | 16,256 | ||
The total rent expense was $3.2 million, $1.9 million and $1.3 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
F-30
The Company has entered into contracts as sublessor for excess office space. Future minimum lease payment receivables under non-cancellable leasing arrangements as of December 31, 2004 are as follows:
Year ending December 31, |
Amount |
||
---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||
2005 | $ | 635 | |
2006 | 551 | ||
2007 | 274 | ||
2008 | 142 | ||
2009 | 94 | ||
Thereafter | 486 | ||
$ | 2,182 | ||
The total rent income was $573,000, $453,000 and $409,000 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
(8) Deposits
Deposits consist of the following at December 31, 2004 and 2003:
|
2004 |
2003 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||
Non-interest-bearing deposits: | |||||||
Demand deposits | $ | 105,424 | $ | 70,998 | |||
Total non-interest-bearing deposits | 105,424 | 70,998 | |||||
Interest-bearing deposits: | |||||||
Interest checking | 150,112 | 152,656 | |||||
Money market and statement savings | 29,790 | 30,139 | |||||
Certificates of deposit | 538,884 | 220,336 | |||||
Total interest-bearing deposits | 718,786 | 403,131 | |||||
Total deposits | $ | 824,210 | $ | 474,129 | |||
Brokered certificates of deposit at December 31, 2004 were $86.7 million. We had no brokered certificates of deposit at December 31, 2003.
Interest expense by deposit categories were as follows for the years indicated:
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||
Interest checking | $ | 2,016 | $ | 2,375 | $ | 3,073 | |||
Money market and statement savings | 213 | 243 | 577 | ||||||
Certificates of deposit | 10,465 | 6,038 | 5,714 | ||||||
$ | 12,694 | $ | 8,656 | $ | 9,364 | ||||
F-31
The aggregate amount of time deposits, each with a minimum denomination of $100,000, was $225.3 million and $103.6 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
At December 31, 2004, the scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit are as follows:
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||
---|---|---|---|
2005 | $ | 202,068 | |
2006 | 30,376 | ||
2007 | 250,007 | ||
2008 | 45,587 | ||
2009 and thereafter | 10,846 | ||
$ | 538,884 | ||
(9) Other Borrowed Funds
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, other borrowed funds consist of the following:
|
2004 |
2003 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|||||
Fixed rate advances from the FHLB | $ | 81,958 | $ | 43,958 | ||
Variable rate advances from the FHLB | 55,000 | 5,000 | ||||
Repurchase agreements | 30,357 | 25,499 | ||||
Payable to Statutory Trust I | 20,619 | — | ||||
Fed funds purchased | 7,000 | — | ||||
TT&L note option | 6,151 | — | ||||
$ | 201,085 | $ | 74,457 | |||
The Company has fixed rate advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (FHLB) of $82.0 million at December 31, 2004. These advances mature through 2014 and have interest rates ranging from 1.56% to 3.59%. At December 31, 2003, the Company had $44.0 million in fixed advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta with maturities through 2008 and interest rates ranging from 1.31% to 2.81%.
The Company has also a variable rate advance from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta of $55.0 million at December 31, 2004, which matures in 2005. The variable rate is based on the federal funds purchased rate and reprices daily. At December 31, 2004, the variable interest rate was 2.44%. At December 31, 2003, the Company had an adjustable rate advance of $5.0 million which matured during 2004. The adjustable rate was based on the three month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR).
F-32
The contractual maturities of the fixed and variable rate advances are as follows:
At December 31, 2004 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type of Advance |
Interest Rate |
Advance Term |
Maturity Date |
Balance |
|||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 1.56 | % | 12 months | Jan-05 | $ | 5,000 | |||
Fixed Rate Credit | 1.82 | 24 months | Mar-05 | 1,000 | |||||
Daily Rate Credit | 2.44 | 12 months | Jul-05 | 55,000 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 1.83 | 18 months | Jul-05 | 5,000 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 2.33 | 36 months | Mar-06 | 1,000 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 2.58 | 24 months | May-06 | 2,000 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 2.07 | 36 months | Jul-06 | 6,250 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 2.81 | 48 months | Mar-07 | 1,000 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 3.15 | 36 months | Apr-07 | 3,000 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 2.63 | 48 months | Jul-07 | 6,250 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 3.59 | 36 months | Dec-07 | 7,500 | |||||
Principal Reducing Credit | 2.29 | 60 months | Jul-08 | 8,958 | |||||
Convertible | 2.91 | 60 months | May-09 | 5,000 | |||||
Convertible | 3.50 | 60 months | May-09 | 10,000 | |||||
Convertible | 3.33 | 10 years | Apr-14 | 10,000 | |||||
Convertible | 3.47 | 10 years | May-14 | 10,000 | |||||
Total FHLB Advances | 2.68 | % | $ | 136,958 | |||||
At December 31, 2003 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type of Advance |
Interest Rate |
Advance Term |
Maturity Date |
Balance |
|||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 1.31 | % | 5 months | Jan-04 | $ | 2,000 | |||
Fixed Rate Credit | 1.63 | 12 months | Jan-04 | 2,000 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 1.72 | 12 months | Jan-04 | 2,000 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 1.36 | 6 months | Feb-04 | 2,000 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 1.54 | 12 months | Mar-04 | 1,000 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 1.65 | 12 months | Mar-04 | 2,000 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 1.81 | 18 months | Jul-04 | 2,000 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 1.96 | 18 months | Jul-04 | 2,000 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 1.77 | 18 months | Sep-04 | 1,000 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 1.86 | 18 months | Sep-04 | 1,000 | |||||
Adjustable Rate Credit | 1.23 | 12 months | Dec-04 | 5,000 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 1.82 | 24 months | Mar-05 | 1,000 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 2.33 | 36 months | Mar-06 | 1,000 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 2.07 | 36 months | Jul-06 | 6,250 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 2.81 | 48 months | Mar-07 | 1,000 | |||||
Fixed Rate Credit | 2.63 | 48 months | Jul-07 | 6,250 | |||||
Principal Reducing Fixed Rate Credit | 2.29 | 60 months | Jul-08 | 11,458 | |||||
Total FHLB Advances | 1.98 | % | $ | 48,958 | |||||
F-33
The average balances of FHLB advances for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 were $94.8 million and $33.5 million, respectively. The maximum amount outstanding at any month-end during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $137.0 million and $56.8 million, respectively. Total interest expense on FHLB advances for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $2.3 million, $654,000, and $222,000, respectively.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, which are classified as other borrowed funds, generally mature within one to four days from the transaction date. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are reflected at the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction. The Company is required to provide collateral based on the fair value of the underlying securities.
At December 31, 2004 and 2003 the Company had repurchase agreements of $30.4 million and $25.5 million, respectively. The interest rate of the repurchase agreements was 0.75% at December 31, 2004 and 2003. The average balances of the repurchase agreements for 2004 and 2003 were $27.3 million and $9.2 million, respectively, and the maximum amount outstanding at any month-end during 2004 and 2003 were $45.1 million and $26.1 million, respectively. Interest expense on repurchase agreements for 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $180,000, $72,000, and $0, respectively.
Occasionally, the Company purchases fed funds. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company had outstanding purchases in fed funds of $7.0 million and $0, respectively. Interest expense related to fed funds purchased for 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $114,000, $47,000 and $0. The Company also has a TT&L Note Option with the Federal Reserve. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the outstanding balance in the TT&L Note Option was $6.2 million and $0, respectively. Interest expense related to the TT&L Note Option for 2004 was $23,000. There was no interest expense for the TT&L Note Option in 2003 and 2002. The Company has a line of credit at the Federal Reserve discount window. At December 31, 2004, the outstanding balance at the Federal Reserve discount window was $0. Interest expense related to the discount window for 2004 and 2003 was $28,000 and $0, respectively.
In July 2004, the Company formed a new wholly-owned subsidiary, Cardinal Statutory Trust I (the "Trust"), for the purpose of issuing $20.0 million of floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures ("trust preferred securities"). These trust preferred securities are due in 2034 and have an interest rate of LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) plus 2.40%, which adjusts quarterly. These securities are redeemable at a premium through March 2008 and at par thereafter. The Company has guaranteed payment of these securities. The $20.6 million payable by the Company to the Trust is included in other borrowed funds. The Trust is an unconsolidated subsidiary since the Company is not the primary beneficiary of this entity under FIN 46R. The additional $619,000 that is payable by the Company to the Trust relates to the capital of the Trust. The Company utilized the proceeds from the issuance of the trust preferred securities to make a capital contribution into the Bank. Interest expense on trust preferred securities was $382,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004.
F-34
The scheduled maturities of other borrowed funds at December 31, 2004 is as follows:
|
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 and thereafter |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||
FHLB advances | $ | 66,000 | $ | 9,250 | $ | 17,750 | $ | 8,958 | $ | 35,000 | |||||
Repurchase agreements | 30,357 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Statutory Trust I | — | — | — | — | 20,619 | ||||||||||
Fed funds purchased | 7,000 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
TT&L note option | 6,151 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
$ | 109,508 | $ | 9,250 | $ | 17,750 | $ | 8,958 | $ | 55,619 | ||||||
(10) Warehouse Financing
In September 2004, GMM and the Bank entered into a one year $150 million floating rate revolving credit and security agreement with a third party. The purpose of this credit facility is to fund residential mortgage loans at GMM prior to their sale into the secondary market. The credit facility requires, among other things, that GMM and the Bank have positive quarterly net income and maintain specified minimum tangible and regulatory net worth requirements. The Company has guaranteed repayment of this debt. The interest rate on this credit facility is LIBOR plus between 1.50% and 1.875%. At December 31, 2004, $0 of this line was utilized.
In addition to this facility, this same lender has also provided a $100 million facility that is utilized by GMM to warehouse residential mortgage loans held for sale to this lender. The terms of this facility are substantially the same as the above-referenced revolving credit and security agreement and the cost of this facility is netted against interest earned on the loans pending settlement with the lender. At December 31, 2004, $0 of this line was utilized.
GMM also has a $60.0 million line of credit with an unaffiliated party, which it uses to warehouse loans pending sale. This line matures on March 1, 2005 and has an interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.50%. At December 31, 2004, $30.2 million of this line was utilized and the rate was 3.89%.
Interest expense related to GMM's warehouse financing was $228,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004.
(11) Preferred Stock
In connection with the acquisition of Heritage Bancorp, Inc. on September 1, 2000, the Company issued 1,411,268 shares of 7.25% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A. Shares of the Preferred Stock outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002 were 1,364,062 and 1,364,684, respectively. The Series A Preferred Stock has a par value of $1.00 per share and a liquidation preference of $5.00 per share. The terms of the preferred stock call for automatic conversion into the Company's common stock if the common stock trades at a price above $8.65 for 20 consecutive trading days beginning at anytime on or after March 1, 2004. Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock are payable quarterly for a cumulative annual dividend of $0.3625 or 7.25% of the $5.00 liquidation amount, before any dividend is paid on any Cardinal common stock.
F-35
On March 29, 2004, these 1,364,062 preferred shares automatically converted into 1,025,997 shares of common stock and there are no preferred shares outstanding at December 31, 2004.
(12) Income Taxes
The Company and its subsidiaries file consolidated federal tax returns on a calendar-year basis. The Company recorded income tax expense of $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and a benefit of $3.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2003 and had no provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2002.
The provision for income tax expense (benefit) is reconciled to the amount computed by applying the federal corporate tax rate to income before taxes and were as follows for the years indicated:
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|||||||||
Income tax (benefit) at federal corporate rate | $ | 1,762 | $ | 900 | $ | (180 | ) | |||
Expected state tax benefit | (96 | ) | — | — | ||||||
Nondeductible expenses/ other expenses | (49 | ) | 7 | 7 | ||||||
Change in valuation allowance | 96 | (4,415 | ) | 173 | ||||||
$ | 1,713 | $ | (3,508 | ) | $ | — | ||||
The components of income tax expense follow:
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|||||||||||
Included in net income | ||||||||||||
Current | ||||||||||||
Federal | $ | 134 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
State | — | — | — | |||||||||
Total current | 134 | — | — | |||||||||
Deferred |
||||||||||||
Federal | 1,579 | (3,508 | ) | — | ||||||||
State | — | — | — | |||||||||
Total deferred | 1,579 | (3,508 | ) | — | ||||||||
Total included in net income | $ | 1,713 | $ | (3,508 | ) | $ | — | |||||
Included in shareholders' equity | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax expense related to the change in the net unrealized gain on securities | $ | (344 | ) | $ | 1,057 | $ | — | |||||
Total included in shareholders' equity | $ | (344 | ) | $ | 1,057 | $ | — | |||||
F-36
The tax benefits of temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and income tax basis of assets and liabilities relate to the following:
|
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||
Deferred tax assets: | |||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | $ | 1,944 | $ | 1,391 | |||||
Net operating loss carryforwards | 2,120 | 3,606 | |||||||
Unrealized losses on investment securities available-for-sale | 604 | 260 | |||||||
Other | 279 | 126 | |||||||
Total gross deferred assets | 4,947 | 5,383 | |||||||
Less valuation allowance | (765 | ) | (668 | ) | |||||
Net deferred tax assets | 4,182 | 4,715 | |||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|||||||||
Prepaid expenses | (86 | ) | (51 | ) | |||||
Depreciation | (650 | ) | (121 | ) | |||||
Loan origination costs | (208 | ) | (70 | ) | |||||
Total gross deferred tax liabilities | (944 | ) | (242 | ) | |||||
Net deferred tax asset | $ | 3,238 | $ | 4,473 | |||||
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the tax effects of differing carrying values of assets and liabilities for tax and financial statement purposes that will reverse in future periods. When substantial uncertainty exists concerning the recoverability of a deferred tax asset, the carrying value of the asset is reduced by a valuation allowance. A valuation allowance in the amount of $765,000 at December 31, 2004 has been established for deferred tax assets. This valuation allowance relates primarily to the state portion of the net operating losses for the Parent Company and Cardinal Wealth Services, Inc. as realization is dependent upon generating future taxable income within those entities.
The Company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $4.6 million at December 31, 2004, which are available to offset tax payments on future taxable income. The Company's net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows: $1.9 million in 2020 and $2.7 million in 2021.
(13) Derivatives
The Company utilizes forward sale commitments (derivatives) to economically hedge the interest rate risk inherent in entering into interest rate lock loan commitments (derivatives) and originating fixed-rate closed loans for sale. As of December 31, 2004, the fair value of interest rate lock loan commitments with a notional value of $119 million was $(63,000), and the fair value of forward sale commitments with a notional value of $438 million was $587,000. These derivatives are recorded in other assets and other liabilities on the consolidated statement of condition at their fair values. In addition to these market adjustments for open interest rate lock loan commitments and forward sale commitments, at December 31, 2004, a basis adjustment of ($351,000) has been recorded related to the closed loans held for sale which is included in mortgage loans held for sale, net in the consolidated statement of condition.
F-37
The Company had no derivative instruments at December 31, 2003.
(14) Regulatory Matters
The Company's banking subsidiary, Cardinal Bank, as a state-chartered bank, is subject to the dividend restrictions established by the State Corporation Commission of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Under such restrictions, the Bank may not, without the prior approval of the Bank's primary regulator, declare dividends in excess of the sum of the current year's earnings (as defined) plus the retained earnings (as defined) from the prior two years. At December 31, 2004, there were no earnings against which dividends could be paid.
The Bank is required to maintain a minimum average reserve balance with the Federal Reserve Bank. The average amount of the required reserve was $100,000 for 2004.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 ("FDICIA") requires the regulators to stratify institutions into five quality tiers based upon their relative capital strengths and to increase progressively the degree of regulation over the weaker institutions, limits the pass through deposit insurance treatment of certain types of accounts, adopts a "truth in savings" program, calls for the adoption of risk-based premiums on deposit insurance and requires the Bank to observe insider credit underwriting products no less strict than those applied to comparable noninsider transactions.
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company and the Bank met all regulatory capital requirements. The key measures of capital are: (1) total capital (Tier I capital plus the allowance for loan losses up to certain limitations) as a percent of total risk-weighted assets, (2) Tier I capital (as defined) as a percent of total risk-weighted assets (as defined), and (3) Tier I capital (as defined) as a percent of total assets (as defined).
|
Actual |
For Capital Adequacy Purposes |
To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Amount |
Ratio |
Amount |
|
Ratio |
Amount |
|
Ratio |
||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|||||||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital to risk weighted assets | $ | 107,660 | 13.40 | % | $ | 64,294 | ³ | 8.00 | % | $ | 80,368 | ³ | 10.00 | % | ||||||
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets | 101,670 | 12.65 | 32,147 | ³ | 4.00 | 48,221 | ³ | 6.00 | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital to average assets | 101,670 | 8.83 | 46,075 | ³ | 4.00 | 57,594 | ³ | 5.00 |
|
Actual |
For Capital Adequacy Purposes |
To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Amount |
Ratio |
Amount |
|
Ratio |
Amount |
|
Ratio |
||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|||||||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital to risk weighted assets | $ | 90,239 | 20.66 | % | $ | 34,951 | ³ | 8.00 | % | $ | 43,688 | ³ | 10.00 | % | ||||||
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets | 85,896 | 19.66 | 17,475 | ³ | 4.00 | 26,213 | ³ | 6.00 | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital to average assets | 85,896 | 15.45 | 23,365 | ³ | 4.00 | 29,206 | ³ | 5.00 |
F-38
George Mason is required to maintain defined capital levels under Department of Housing and Urban Development guidelines. At December 31, 2004, GMM maintained capital in excess of these required guidelines.
(15) Related-Party Transactions
Officers, directors, employees and their related business interests are loan customers in the ordinary course of business. In management's opinion, these loans are made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with other persons and do not involve more than normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features.
Analysis of activity for loans to related parties is as follows:
|
2004 |
2003 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||
Balance, beginning of year | $ | 4,491 | $ | 4,752 | |||
New loans | 20,000 | 2,242 | |||||
Loans paid off or paid down | (2,415 | ) | (2,503 | ) | |||
Balance, end of year | $ | 22,076 | $ | 4,491 | |||
(16) Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
The following is the calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share. Because the Company had a net loss in 2002, outstanding stock options had an anti-dilutive effect and, therefore, were excluded from the loss per common share calculation.
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the dilutive potential common shares resulting from outstanding stock options added to the weighted average shares for the diluted earnings per common share calculation were 257,000 and 227,000. At December 31, 2004, there were no outstanding stock options excluded from the weighted average shares outstanding for the diluted earnings per share calculation as these stock options have exercise prices that were greater than the average market price of the Company's common stock for the years ended December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2003, 9,000 outstanding stock options were excluded from the weighted average shares outstanding for the diluted
F-39
earnings per share calculation as these stock options have exercise prices that were greater than the average market price of the Company's common stock for the years ended December 31, 2003.
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars and shares in thousands) |
|||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 3,469 | $ | 6,154 | $ | (529 | ) | |||
Dividends to preferred shareholders | — | 495 | 495 | |||||||
Net income (loss) to common shareholders | $ | 3,469 | $ | 5,659 | $ | (1,024 | ) | |||
Weighted average shares for basic | 18,448 | 10,218 | 7,949 | |||||||
Weighted average shares for diluted | 18,705 | 11,468 | 7,949 | |||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per common share | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.55 | $ | (0.13 | ) | |||
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.54 | $ | (0.13 | ) | |||
(17) Employee Benefit Plan
The Company established a 401(k) plan in 1998 for all eligible employees. The Company began to match a portion of employee contributions beginning January 1, 1999. The Company's match for December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $286,000, $106,000, and $102,000, respectively.
(18) Director and Employee Stock Compensation Plans
In 1998, the Company adopted a stock option plan (the "Plan") pursuant to which the Company may grant stock options to employees and members of the Company's and its' subsidiaries' Boards of Directors. 625,000 options to purchase shares of the Company's common stock are authorized under this plan as of December 31, 2004.
During 2004, the shareholders approved the Company's Amended and Restated 2002 Equity Compensation Plan (the "Equity Plan"). The Equity Plan authorizes the granting of options, which may either be incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, phantom stock awards and performance share awards to directors, eligible officers and key employees of the Company. The Equity Plan authorizes the issuance of options and other equity instruments equivalent to 1,450,000 shares of common stock.
Stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the stock's fair market value at the date of grant. Director stock options have ten year terms and vest and become fully exercisable immediately. Certain employee stock options have ten year terms and vest and become fully exercisable after 3 years. Other employee stock options have ten year terms and vest and become fully exercisable in 20% increments beginning as of the grant date. In addition, the Company has granted stock options to employees of the Company that have ten year terms and vest and become fully exercisable in 20% increments beginning after their first year of vesting.
F-40
Stock option activity during the years indicated is as follows:
|
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at December 31, 2001 | 368,028 | $ | 5.23 | ||
Granted |
265,530 |
3.27 |
|||
Forfeited | (90,665 | ) | 5.48 | ||
Balance at December 31, 2002 | 542,893 | $ | 4.22 | ||
Granted |
376,000 |
5.07 |
|||
Exercised | (32,523 | ) | 4.44 | ||
Forfeited | (38,933 | ) | 4.90 | ||
Balance at December 31, 2003 | 847,437 | $ | 4.57 | ||
Granted |
537,018 |
8.71 |
|||
Exercised | (114,663 | ) | 4.36 | ||
Forfeited | (39,304 | ) | 6.29 | ||
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
1,230,488 |
$ |
6.34 |
||
Information pertaining to stock options outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003 is as follows:
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, additional shares available for grant under both stock option plans were 687,858 and 477,563, respectively.
|
Options Outstanding |
Options Exercisable |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Range of Exercise Prices |
Number Outstanding |
Remaining Contractual Life |
Weighed Average Exercise Price |
Number Exercisable |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|||||||
$2.41 – $3.56 | 247,756 | 7.1 years | $ | 3.26 | 143,888 | $ | 3.27 | |||||
$3.95 – $5.50 | 362,748 | 7.8 years | 4.91 | 178,562 | 4.88 | |||||||
$6.38 – $7.25 | 100,857 | 2.5 years | 6.84 | 87,657 | 6.84 | |||||||
$8.28 – $11.15 | 519,127 | 9.3 years | 8.72 | 303,556 | 8.63 | |||||||
Outstanding at year end | 1,230,488 | 7.9 years | $ | 6.34 | 713,663 | $ | 6.39 | |||||
F-41
|
Options Outstanding |
Options Exercisable |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Range of Exercise Prices |
Number Outstanding |
Remaining Contractual Life |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Number Exercisable |
Weighed Average Exercise Price |
|||||||
$2.41 – $3.56 | 305,999 | 7.8 years | $ | 3.27 | 163,455 | $ | 3.36 | |||||
$3.95 – $5.50 | 415,241 | 8.8 years | 4.86 | 128,211 | 4.83 | |||||||
$6.38 – $7.25 | 126,197 | 6.1 years | 6.79 | 103,447 | 6.77 | |||||||
Outstanding at year end | 847,437 | 8.0 years | $ | 4.57 | 395,113 | $ | 4.73 | |||||
(19) Segment Reporting
In 2002 and 2003, the Company operated and reported in two business segments, commercial banking and investment services. As of July 7, 2004, the Company began operating in a third business segment, mortgage banking, with the completion of its acquisition of GMM. The commercial banking segment includes both commercial and consumer lending and provides customers such products as commercial loans, real estate loans, and other business financing and consumer loans. In addition, this segment also provides customers with several choices of deposit products including demand deposit accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit. The mortgage banking segment engages primarily in the origination and acquisition of residential mortgages for sale into the secondary market on a best efforts basis. The investment services segment provides advisory services to businesses and individuals including financial planning and retirement/estate planning.
Information about reportable segments, and reconciliation of such information to the consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 follows:
At and for the Year Ended December 31, 2004:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Commercial Banking |
Mortgage Banking |
Investment Services |
Intersegment Elimination |
Other |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net interest income | $ | 21,753 | $ | 3,057 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (257 | ) | $ | 24,553 | |||||
Provision for loan losses | 1,626 | — | — | — | — | 1,626 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest income | 1,804 | 6,953 | 645 | — | 7 | 9,409 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest expense | 17,065 | 7,889 | 800 | — | 1,400 | 27,154 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 1,628 | 698 | (52 | ) | — | (561 | ) | 1,713 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 3,238 | $ | 1,423 | $ | (103 | ) | $ | — | $ | (1,089 | ) | $ | 3,469 | ||||
Total Assets | $ | 1,123,868 | $ | 392,241 | $ | 685 | $ | (421,203 | ) | $ | 115,985 | $ | 1,211,576 |
F-42
At and for the Year Ended December 31, 2003:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Commercial Banking |
Investment Services |
Intersegment Elimination |
Other |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net interest income | $ | 15,077 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 96 | $ | 15,173 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | 1,001 | — | — | — | 1,001 | |||||||||||
Non-interest income | 2,954 | 843 | — | 32 | 3,829 | |||||||||||
Non-interest expense | 13,265 | 820 | — | 1,270 | 15,355 | |||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | (464 | ) | (443 | ) | — | (2,601 | ) | (3,508 | ) | |||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 4,229 | $ | 466 | $ | — | $ | 1,459 | $ | 6,154 | ||||||
Total Assets | $ | 630,415 | $ | 776 | $ | (80,903 | ) | $ | 85,960 | $ | 636,248 |
At and for the Year Ended December 31, 2002:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Commercial Banking |
Investment Services |
Intersegment Elimination |
Other |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net interest income | $ | 10,575 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 81 | $ | 10,656 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | 444 | — | — | — | 444 | |||||||||||
Non-interest income | 1,848 | 942 | — | 74 | 2,864 | |||||||||||
Non-interest expense | 11,995 | 1,147 | — | 463 | 13,605 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (16 | ) | $ | (205 | ) | $ | — | $ | (308 | ) | $ | (529 | ) | ||
Total Assets | $ | 483,135 | $ | 274 | $ | (38,245 | ) | $ | 41,159 | $ | 486,323 |
The Company does not have operating segments other than those reported. Parent Company financial information is included in the "Other" category and represents an overhead function rather than an operating segment. The parent company's most significant assets are its net investments in its operating subsidiaries. The parent company's net interest income is comprised of interest income from short-term investments and interest expense on trust preferred securities.
(20) Financial Instruments with Off Balance Sheet Risk
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and financial guarantees. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer so long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments usually have fixed expiration dates up to one year or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of the contractual obligations by a customer to a third party. The majority of these guarantees extend until satisfactory completion of the customer's contractual obligations. All standby letters of credit outstanding at December 31, 2004 are collateralized.
F-43
These instruments represent obligations of the Company to extend credit or guarantee borrowings and are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition. The rates and terms of these instruments are competitive with others in the market in which the Company operates. Substantially all of these instruments as of December 31, 2004 have floating rates.
Those instruments may involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition. Credit risk is defined as the possibility of sustaining a loss because the other parties to a financial instrument fail to perform in accordance with the terms of the contract. The Company's maximum exposure to credit loss under standby letters of credit and commitments to extend credit is represented by the contractual amounts of those instruments.
|
2004 |
2003 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent potential credit risk: | |||||||
Commitments to extend credit | $ | 324,786 | $ | 111,182 | |||
Standby letters of credit | 5,159 | 3,330 |
The Company had recorded no liability associated with standby letters of credit at December 31, 2004 as such amounts were immaterial.
At December 31, 2004, GMM maintained a $75,000 reserve for loans sold that paid off within a contractual agreed upon period, thereby requiring that GMM refund part of the purchase price.
The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments. The Company evaluates each customer's creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis and requires collateral to support financial instruments when deemed necessary. The amount of collateral obtained upon extension of credit is based on management's evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include deposits held by the Company, marketable securities, accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.
The Company has guaranteed payment of the $20.0 million debt of Statutory Trust I and has also guaranteed repayment of any borrowing under GMM's $150 million line of credit.
(21) Disclosures of Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The assumptions used and the estimates disclosed represent management's best judgment of appropriate valuation methods. These estimates are based on pertinent information available to management at the valuation date. In certain cases, fair values are not subject to precise quantification or verification and may change as economic and market factors and management's evaluation of those factors change.
Although management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of these financial instruments, there are inherent limitations in any estimation technique. Therefore, these fair value estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company would realize in a market transaction. Because of the wide range of valuation techniques and the numerous estimates which must
F-44
be made, it may be difficult to make reasonable comparisons of the Company's fair value information to that of other financial institutions. It is important that the many uncertainties discussed above be considered when using the estimated fair value disclosures and that, because of these uncertainties, the aggregate fair value amount should not be construed as representative of the underlying value of the Company.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following summarizes the significant methodologies and assumptions used in estimating the fair values presented in the accompanying table.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents is used as a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Derivatives
Derivative assets and liabilities are valued at fair value as determined by changes in market interest rates.
Investment Securities and Other Investments
Fair values for investment securities are based on quoted market prices or prices quoted for similar financial instruments. Fair value for other investments is estimated at their cost since no active trading markets exist.
Loans Held for Sale, Net
Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or market. The estimated fair value is based upon the purchase price commitment the Company has.
Loans Receivable, Net
In order to determine the fair market value for loans receivable, the loan portfolio was segmented based on loan type, credit quality and maturities. For certain variable rate loans with no significant credit concerns and frequent repricings, estimated fair values are based on current carrying amounts. The fair values of other loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.
Deposits
The fair values disclosed for demand deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (that is, their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts of variable rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit (CDs) approximate their fair value at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate CDs are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on CDs to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.
F-45
Other Borrowed Funds
The fair value of other borrowed funds is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently available with similar terms.
Commitments to Extend Credit
The fair value of these financial instruments is based on the credit quality and relationship, fees, interest rates, probability of funding, compensating balance and other covenants or requirements. These commitments generally have fixed expiration dates expiring within one year. Many commitments are expected to, and typically do, expire without being drawn upon. The rates and terms of these instruments are competitive with others in the market in which the Company operates. The carrying amounts are reasonable estimates of the fair value of these financial instruments. The carrying amounts of these instruments are zero at December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Accrued Interest
The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate their fair values.
Fair value of financial instruments as of December 31, 2004 and 2003:
|
December 31, 2004 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Carrying Amount |
Estimated Fair Value |
|||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||
Financial assets: | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 23,408 | $ | 23,408 | |||
Investment securities and other investments | 297,617 | 296,273 | |||||
Loans held for sale at lower of cost or market, net | 365,454 | 367,824 | |||||
Loans receivable, net | 489,896 | 491,868 | |||||
Accrued interest receivable | 2,542 | 2,542 | |||||
Derivative asset | 587 | 587 | |||||
Financial liabilities: |
|||||||
Demand deposits | $ | 105,424 | $ | 105,424 | |||
Interest checking | 150,112 | 150,112 | |||||
Money market and statement savings | 29,790 | 29,790 | |||||
Certificates of deposit | 538,884 | 534,090 | |||||
Other borrowed funds | 201,085 | 197,532 | |||||
Warehouse financing | 30,245 | 30,245 | |||||
Mortgage funding checks | 46,392 | 46,392 | |||||
Accrued interest payable | 1,038 | 1,038 | |||||
Derivative liability | 64 | 64 | |||||
Other: Commitments to extend credit |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
F-46
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Carrying Amount |
Estimated Fair Value |
|||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||
Financial assets: | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 13,083 | $ | 13,083 | |||
Investment securities and other investments | 277,131 | 275,909 | |||||
Loans receivable, net | 331,658 | 327,087 | |||||
Accrued interest receivable | 2,082 | 2,082 | |||||
Financial liabilities: |
|||||||
Demand deposits | $ | 70,998 | $ | 70,998 | |||
Interest checking | 152,656 | 152,656 | |||||
Money market and statement savings | 30,139 | 30,139 | |||||
Certificates of deposit | 220,336 | 227,871 | |||||
Other borrowed funds | 74,457 | 73,967 | |||||
Accrued interest payable | 164 | 164 | |||||
Other: Commitments to extend credit |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
F-47
(22) Parent Company Only Financial Statements
The Cardinal Financial Corporation (parent company only) condensed financial statements are as follows:
PARENT COMPANY ONLY CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
December 31, 2004 and 2003
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2004 |
2003 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 10,557 | $ | 45,516 | |||
Other investments | 63 | 63 | |||||
Investment in subsidiaries | 99,905 | 35,318 | |||||
Premises and equipment, net | 1,308 | 1,552 | |||||
Goodwill | 22 | 22 | |||||
Other assets | 4,130 | 3,489 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 115,985 | $ | 85,960 | |||
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity |
|||||||
Debt to Cardinal Statutory Trust I | $ | 20,619 | $ | — | |||
Other liabilities | 261 | 548 | |||||
Total liabilities | 20,880 | 548 | |||||
Total shareholders' equity | $ | 95,105 | $ | 85,412 | |||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 115,985 | $ | 85,960 | |||
PARENT COMPANY ONLY CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Income: | |||||||||||
Net interest income | $ | (257 | ) | $ | 96 | $ | 81 | ||||
Other income | 7 | 32 | 74 | ||||||||
Total income | (250 | ) | 128 | 155 | |||||||
Expense—General and administrative |
1,400 |
1,270 |
463 |
||||||||
Net loss before income taxes and equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries |
(1,650 | ) | (1,142 | ) | (308 | ) | |||||
Income tax benefit | (561 | ) | (2,601 | ) | — | ||||||
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries | 4,558 | 4,695 | (221 | ) | |||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 3,469 | $ | 6,154 | $ | (529 | ) | ||||
F-48
PARENT COMPANY ONLY CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 3,469 | $ | 6,154 | $ | (529 | ) | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | ||||||||||||||
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries | (4,558 | ) | (4,695 | ) | 221 | |||||||||
Depreciation | 240 | 261 | 238 | |||||||||||
Increase in other assets, liabilities and goodwill | (914 | ) | (2,600 | ) | (2,413 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (1,763 | ) | (880 | ) | (2,483 | ) | ||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||||
Capital infusion into subsidiary | (60,000 | ) | (1,000 | ) | (12,275 | ) | ||||||||
Net change in premises and equipment | 4 | 11 | 161 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of other investments | — | — | 4 | |||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (59,996 | ) | (989 | ) | (12,110 | ) | ||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||||
Proceeds from rights and secondary offerings | 6,302 | 41,747 | 18,493 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from trust preferred issuance | 20,000 | — | — | |||||||||||
Dividends declared on preferred stock | — | (495 | ) | (495 | ) | |||||||||
Stock options exercised | 498 | 144 | — | |||||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | 26,800 | 41,396 | 17,998 | |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(34,959 |
) |
39,527 |
3,405 |
||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
45,516 |
5,989 |
2,584 |
|||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
$ |
10,557 |
$ |
45,516 |
$ |
5,989 |
||||||||
F-49
(23) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Effective July 7, 2004, the Bank completed its acquisition of GMM in a cash transaction of $17.0 million. This transaction was accounted for as a purchase and GMM's assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value as of the purchase date. This transaction resulted in the recognition of $12.9 million of goodwill and amortizable other intangible assets of $1.7 million.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 as of January 1, 2002, and, therefore, discontinued the amortization of goodwill on January 1, 2002. The Company has evaluated impairment of goodwill under SFAS No. 142. The evaluation of goodwill under this statement did not result in impairment of the Company's goodwill as of the annual evaluation date.
Information concerning amortizable intangibles at December 31, 2004 is as follows:
|
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|||||
Customer relationships | $ | 1,781 | $ | 49 |
The aggregate amortization expense for 2004 was $49,000 and the estimated amortization expense for the next five years is as follows:
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||
---|---|---|---|
2005 | $ | 198 | |
2006 | 198 | ||
2007 | 198 | ||
2008 | 198 | ||
2009 | 198 |
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2004 are as follows:
|
Commercial Banking |
Mortgage Banking |
Total |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2003 | $ | 22 | $ | — | $ | 22 | |||
Goodwill attributable to GMM acquisition | — | 12,941 | 12,941 | ||||||
Balance at December 31, 2004 | $ | 22 | $ | 12,941 | $ | 12,963 | |||
F-50
(24) Other Operating Expenses
The following shows the composition of other operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002:
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||
Stationary and supplies | $ | 965 | $ | 387 | $ | 317 | |||
Advertising and marketing | 1,613 | 913 | 540 | ||||||
Other taxes | 548 | 390 | 248 | ||||||
Travel and entertainment | 427 | 138 | 127 | ||||||
Bank operations | 676 | 608 | 505 | ||||||
Premises and equipment | 800 | 351 | 271 | ||||||
Miscellaneous | 797 | 838 | 446 | ||||||
Total other operating expenses | $ | 5,826 | $ | 3,625 | $ | 2,454 | |||
(25) Subsequent Events
In January 2005, the Company began deferred compensation plans for its directors and certain employees. Under the directors' plan, a director may elect to defer all or a portion of any director related fees including fees for serving on board committees. Under the employees' plan, certain employees may defer all or a portion of their compensation including any bonus or commission compensation. Director and employee deferrals, other than employees of George Mason, are matched 50% by the Company. Deferrals made by employees of George Mason are not eligible for the Company match. The amount of the Company match is deemed invested in Cardinal Financial Corporation common stock which vests immediately for the directors and after four years for employees. The maximum Company match per employee is $50,000 per year.
In February 2005, the Company awarded 457,235 stock options to its officers at an exercise price of $10.78, the market value on the grant date. These options fully vested on the award date.
F-51
GEORGE MASON MORTGAGE, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
Interest income: | ||||||||
Loans held for sale | $ | 4,434 | $ | 10,249 | ||||
Loans receivable | 1,116 | 1,527 | ||||||
Other | 2 | 3 | ||||||
Total interest income | 5,552 | 11,779 | ||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||
Warehouse financing | 1,544 | 5,096 | ||||||
Total interest expense | 1,544 | 5,096 | ||||||
Net interest income | 4,008 | 6,683 | ||||||
Non-interest income: |
||||||||
Gain on sale of loans held for sale | 7,260 | 11,804 | ||||||
Loan service charges | 565 | 1,123 | ||||||
Management fee income | 1,309 | 2,345 | ||||||
Total non-interest income | 9,134 | 15,272 | ||||||
Non-interest expense: |
||||||||
Salary and benefits | 5,895 | 6,965 | ||||||
Occupancy | 901 | 778 | ||||||
Other operating expenses | 2,659 | 2,977 | ||||||
Total non-interest expense | 9,455 | 10,720 | ||||||
Net income before income taxes | 3,687 | 11,235 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes |
1,034 |
3,164 |
||||||
Net income | $ | 2,653 | $ | 8,071 | ||||
F-52
GEORGE MASON MORTGAGE, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004, and 2003
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Retained Earnings |
|
||||||||||||
|
Shares |
Amount |
Total |
||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2002 | 9 | $ | 9 | $ | 891 | $ | 26,364 | $ | 27,264 | ||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 8,071 | 8,071 | ||||||||||
Dividends | — | — | — | (3,975 | ) | (3,975 | ) | ||||||||
Balance June 30, 2003 | 9 | $ | 9 | $ | 891 | $ | 30,460 | $ | 31,360 | ||||||
Balance December 31, 2003 | 9 | $ | 9 | $ | 891 | $ | 32,688 | $ | 33,588 | ||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 2,653 | 2,653 | ||||||||||
Dividends | — | — | — | (27,757 | ) | (27,757 | ) | ||||||||
Balance June 30, 2004 | 9 | $ | 9 | $ | 891 | $ | 7,584 | $ | 8,484 | ||||||
F-53
GEORGE MASON MORTGAGE, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||
Net income | $ | 2,653 | $ | 8,071 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 510 | 374 | ||||||||
Loans held for sale originated and acquired | (1,039,366 | ) | (1,162,498 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from the sale of loans held for sale | 1,012,080 | 1,204,918 | ||||||||
Gain on sale of loans held for sale | (7,260 | ) | (11,804 | ) | ||||||
Increase in accrued interest receivable and other assets | (2,673 | ) | (626 | ) | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable and other liabilities | 1,591 | (1,415 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | (32,465 | ) | 37,020 | |||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||
Purchase of premises and equipment | (547 | ) | (775 | ) | ||||||
Net (increase) decrease in loans receivable, net | (107 | ) | 305 | |||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (654 | ) | (470 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in warehouse financing | 60,740 | (30,649 | ) | |||||||
Dividends paid to Parent | (27,757 | ) | (3,975 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 32,983 | (34,624 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (136 | ) | 1,926 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period | 6,974 | 5,615 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period | $ | 6,838 | $ | 7,541 | ||||||
F-54
Report of Independent Auditors
Board
of Directors
George Mason Mortgage, LLC
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of income, shareholder's equity, and cash flows of George Mason Mortgage, LLC and Subsidiary (the Company) for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated results of operations and cash flows of George Mason Mortgage, LLC and Subsidiary for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
/s/ McQuade Brennan, LLP
Washington,
DC
November 12, 2004
F-55
GEORGE MASON MORTGAGE, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands)
|
2003 |
2002 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interest income: | ||||||||
Loans held for sale | $ | 18,131 | $ | 10,465 | ||||
Loans receivable | 2,844 | 2,296 | ||||||
Other | 5 | 4 | ||||||
Total interest income | 20,980 | 12,765 | ||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||
Warehouse financing | 8,647 | 3,382 | ||||||
Total interest expense | 8,647 | 3,382 | ||||||
Net interest income | 12,333 | 9,383 | ||||||
Non-interest income: |
||||||||
Gain on sale of loans held for sale | 23,524 | 16,034 | ||||||
Loan service charges | 1,896 | 1,277 | ||||||
Management fee income | 4,026 | 3,246 | ||||||
Total non-interest income | 29,446 | 20,557 | ||||||
Non-interest expense: |
||||||||
Salary and benefits | 13,351 | 9,236 | ||||||
Occupancy | 1,651 | 1,201 | ||||||
Other operating expenses | 6,344 | 4,600 | ||||||
Total non-interest expense | 21,346 | 15,037 | ||||||
Net income before income taxes | 20,433 | 14,903 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes | 5,745 | 4,189 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 14,688 | $ | 10,714 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-56
GEORGE MASON MORTGAGE, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands)
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Retained Earnings |
|
||||||||||||
|
Shares |
Amount |
Total |
||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2001 | 9 | $ | 9 | $ | 891 | $ | 19,874 | $ | 20,774 | ||||||
Net income |
— |
— |
— |
10,714 |
10,714 |
||||||||||
Accrued dividends | — | — | — | (4,224 | ) | (4,224 | ) | ||||||||
Balance December 31, 2002 | 9 | $ | 9 | $ | 891 | $ | 26,364 | $ | 27,264 | ||||||
Net income |
— |
— |
— |
14,688 |
14,688 |
||||||||||
Dividends | — | — | — | (8,364 | ) | (8,364 | ) | ||||||||
Balance December 31, 2003 | 9 | $ | 9 | $ | 891 | $ | 32,688 | $ | 33,588 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-57
GEORGE MASON MORTGAGE, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands)
|
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 14,688 | $ | 10,714 | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 831 | 497 | |||||||||
Loans held for sale originated and acquired | (491,869 | ) | (1,279,695 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from the sale of loans held for sale | 846,029 | 1,004,161 | |||||||||
Gain on sale of loans held for sale | (23,524 | ) | (16,034 | ) | |||||||
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets | 3,596 | (1,877 | ) | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable and other liabilities | (11,162 | ) | 8,076 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 338,589 | (274,158 | ) | ||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||||||
Purchase of premises and equipment | (1,479 | ) | (1,476 | ) | |||||||
Decrease in loans receivable, net | 156 | 364 | |||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (1,323 | ) | (1,112 | ) | |||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in warehouse financing | (327,543 | ) | 282,077 | ||||||||
Dividends paid to Parent | (8,364 | ) | (4,224 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (335,907 | ) | 277,853 | ||||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 1,359 | 2,583 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |
5,615 |
3,032 |
|||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period |
$ |
6,974 |
$ |
5,615 |
|||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-58
GEORGE MASON MORTGAGE, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2003 and 2002
NOTE A—Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization | George Mason Mortgage, LLC (the Company) is a wholly owned subsidiary of United Bank (the Parent), which is a wholly owned subsidiary of United Bankshares, Inc. (UBSI) a registered bank holding company. The Company is a mortgage banker and is predominantly engaged in originating residential and construction loans in Northern Virginia, Maryland and West Virginia. Loans originated are generally conventional loans and are collateralized by single family residences in this geographic area. | |
Basis of Presentation |
The consolidated financial statements and the notes to consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Excel Title Company. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United State requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
||
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
For purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, cash equivalents are defined as highly liquid investments not held for sale with maturities of three months or less when purchased. |
|
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale |
Mortgage loans held for sale to investors are carried at the lower of cost (net of discounts) or market. Market is determined by investor commitment prices or current auction rates at the date of the financial statements. Adjustments to carrying value of loans held for sale are made by charges to income. Differences between the carrying amount of mortgage loans held for sale and amounts received upon the sale are credited or charged to income. Mortgage loans held for sale are collateralized by single-family residences. All sales of mortgage loans are made on a servicing released basis. |
|
The Company has agreements with Intercoastal Mortgage Company, First Heritage Mortgage, LLC, Home Mortgage Resources, LLC, and Premier Mortgage Company LLC (collectively, the Mortgage Companies) to provide assistance and support services in the overall management of their mortgage banking businesses. For services provided to the Mortgage Companies, the Company receives a management fee as determined by the agreements. At December 31, 2003 and 2002 approximately $133,267,000 and $221,674,000 of mortgage loans held for sale have been purchased by the Company from the Mortgage Companies. |
||
Loan Origination Fees |
Loan origination fees, as well as discounts and certain direct origination costs, are initially recorded as an adjustment of the cost of the loan and are reflected in income when the loan is sold. Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs related to loans receivable are deferred and amortized to income as a yield adjustment over the estimated life of the loan. |
|
F-59
Allowance for Loan Losses |
The provision for loan losses represents management's judgment as to the amount necessary to bring the allowance for loan losses to a level considered adequate in relation to the risk of inherent losses in the loan portfolio. While it is the Company's policy to charge loans off in the current period in which a loss is considered probable, there continues to exist the risk of losses which cannot be quantified precisely or attributed to specific loans. In assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management relies on its ongoing review of the loan portfolio, historical collection experience, general economic conditions, and specific client composition within the loan portfolio. If the actual collection experience changes, revisions to the allowance may be necessary. Based on the information available to the Company, the allowance for loan losses is adequate. The allowance for loan losses remained unchanged at $122,767 in 2003 and 2002. |
|
Property and Equipment |
Furniture and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed principally on the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Gains and losses on disposition are reflected in current operations. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operating expenses and major alterations and renovations are capitalized. |
|
Income Taxes |
The Company is a limited liability company. Accordingly, the Company itself incurs no income tax liability. Rather, the Company's income is taxed at the consolidated level as its operations are included in the consolidated Federal income tax return of UBSI. In accordance with UBSI's corporate income tax allocation agreement, UBSI allocates an amount in lieu of income taxes to the Company based on the effective income tax rate of the consolidated corporate subsidiaries. The amount of this allocation is reported in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Income as Provision for Income Taxes. |
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
Due to the short-term nature and credit characteristics of the Company's financial instruments, the carrying values approximate the fair values as of December 31, 2003 and 2002. |
|
Derivative Financial Instruments |
The Company accounts for derivatives in accordance with FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 133), Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. The adoption of this standard did not materially affect reported financial position or results of operation of the Company. The provisions of this statement require that derivative instruments be carried at fair value on the balance sheet. The statement continues to allow derivative instruments to be used to hedge various risks and sets forth specific criteria to determine when hedge accounting can be used. |
|
F-60
In accordance with SFAS No. 133, the Company is required to recognize its commitments with borrowers (interest rate lock commitments) and investors (best efforts commitments) on loans originated for sale in its mortgage banking operations. These commitments are entered into with the borrower and investor to manage the inherent interest rate and pricing risk associated with selling loans in the secondary market. These derivatives are accounted for by recognizing the fair value of the contracts and commitments on the balance sheet as either a freestanding asset or liability, with a corresponding offset recorded in other comprehensive income within shareholder's equity, net of income tax. Amounts are reclassified from other comprehensive income into the income statement in the period or periods that the hedge transaction affects earnings. Unlike most derivative instruments, there is no active market for interest rate lock commitments that can be used to determine its fair value. The Company estimates the fair value of the interest rate lock commitments based on an estimate of the ultimate gain on sale of the underlying mortgage net of the cost to originate the loan, given the probability that the loan will fund within the terms of the commitment. The change in the fair value of the underlying mortgage loan is measured from the lock date. Therefore, at the time of issuance the fair value of the interest rate lock commitment is negligible. After issuance, the fair value of the commitment can be positive or negative depending on the change in value of the underlying mortgage loan. The probability that the loan will fund is driven primarily by the change, if any, in the mortgage interest rates after the lock date. The Company has developed funding ratio estimates using historical data which are used to estimate the amount of loans that will fund within the commitment terms. Similarly, the Company determines the fair value of the best efforts purchase commitments by investors by calculating the change in the fair value of the underlying mortgage loans. |
||
Revenue Recognition |
Gains on sale of loans represent the difference between the net sales proceeds and the carrying value of the mortgage loans sold, and are recognized at the time of sale. Loan origination fees, as well as discount points and certain direct origination costs, are recognized in income when the loans held for sale are sold. |
|
Interest income is accrued as earned. Interest on mortgage loans held for sale accrues on loans from the date of funding through the date of sale. Interest on loans is computed based on the contractual loan rate. |
||
Generally, the Company is not exposed to significant credit risk on its loans sold to investors. In the normal course of business, the Company is obligated to repurchase loans from investors consistent with the terms of its investor contracts. At the time of loan sale, the Company records a repurchase provision. Historically, the repurchase provision has been less than .10% of sold loans. The liability for potential losses applicable to sold loans is included in accrued expenses. |
||
Advertising |
Advertising costs, which include the costs of production and communication, are expensed as incurred. |
F-61
NOTE B—Income Tax Allocation
The provision for income taxes at December 31, 2003 and 2002 was as follows:
|
2003 |
2002 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allocation in lieu of income tax expense | $ | 5,744,547 | $ | 4,188,848 |
Income taxes paid to the Parent in 2003 and 2002 were $6,146,718 and $4,481,389, respectively.
NOTE C—Retirement Plans
Employees of the Company participate in UBSI's 401 (k) plan. All employees who complete at least 90 days of continuous service are eligible to participate in the plan. Each participant may contribute from 1% to 15% of pre-tax earnings to his or her account. The Company matches 100% of the first 2% of salary deferred and 25% of the next 2% of salary deferred with the common stock of UBSI. Vesting is 100% for employee deferrals, and the Company matches at the time the employee makes his/her deferral. The Company may contribute additional amounts to the plan at the discretion of the Board of Directors. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company contributed $267,788 and 213,256, respectively.
The Parent established a deferred compensation plan which covered two of the Company's key employees. Periodic charges are made to operations so that the present value of the liability due each employee is fully recorded as of the date of their retirement. The expense recognized for this deferred compensation plan was $106,041 and $79,358 for 2003 and 2002, respectively.
UBSI sponsors a defined benefit pension plan which covers substantially all employees. The plan provides pension benefits based on the average base salary for certain specified years of service prior to retirement. At December 31, 2003, the fair value of plan assets exceeded the projected benefit obligation. Separate financial data for the Company's allocation is not available with respect to such plan. Pension expense allocated by the Parent for the defined benefit plan was $341,866 and $26,011 for 2003 and 2002, respectively.
NOTE D—Related Party Transactions
In addition to the warehouse lines of credit discussed in Note F, the Company has other transactions with the Parent as follows:
|
2003 |
2002 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Other employee benefits and general and administrative expenses | $ | 609,654 | $ | 239,267 | ||
Loans sold | 144,833,899 | 90,207,865 | ||||
Accrued health insurance payable | 12,965 | — |
Loans committed to be sold to the Parent included in loans held for sale, were $20,391,500 at December 31, 2003.
As discussed in Note A, the Company provides administrative and overall management support for the Mortgage Companies. The Company recognized management fee income for these services of $4,026,000 and $3,246,000 in 2003 and 2002, respectively. The Company recognizes interest income related to borrowings under its warehouse line of credit used to fund mortgage loans originated by the
F-62
Mortgage Companies. Interest income recognized was $4,629,624 and $2,368,160 in 2003 and 2002, respectively.
NOTE E—Commitments
As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, substantially all mortgage loans held for sale and interest rate lock commitments with potential borrowers were identically matched with commitments from outside investors to purchase such loans. These investors are national and regional mortgage bankers and savings and loan institutions whose credit worthiness is evaluated annually. The terms of these commitments are generally 60 to 90 days and are entered into in an effort to minimize the Company's exposure to interest rate fluctuations. The commitments are not mandatory in nature, thus there is not a specific commitment that must be filled. The fair value of the derivative financial instruments related to the best efforts commitment with the investors was $221,614 and $1,255,279 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, while the fair value of the derivative financial instruments related to the interest rate lock commitments with potential borrowers was $408,066 and $4,570,957 at December 31, 2003 and 2002. The carrying value of loans held for sale was adjusted to market value by $186,452 and $3,315,678 at December 31, 2003 and 2002.
As of December 31, 2003, minimum rental payments under the noncancelable leases were as follows:
Years Ending December 31, |
Amount |
||
---|---|---|---|
2004 | $ | 1,701,547 | |
2005 | 1,623,670 | ||
2006 | 1,553,724 | ||
2007 | 912,446 | ||
2008 | 36,458 | ||
Total | $ | 5,827,845 | |
For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, rent expense totaled $1,651,434 and $1,201,322, respectively.
The Company is a HUD Title II Nonsupervised Mortgagee. As such, the Company is subject to certain minimum net worth requirements as established by HUD. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company's net worth is $31,860,288 and $25,000,023 in excess of HUD's minimum net worth requirement of $1,000,000.
NOTE F—Subsequent Event
In July 2004, UBSI sold all of the outstanding member units in the Company to Cardinal Bank NA in a cash transaction. The Company is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cardinal Bank NA which is headquartered in McLean, Virginia.
F-63
Pro Forma Financial Information
The following unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial statements have been prepared on a consolidated basis based upon the historical financial statements of the Company and George Mason Mortgage, LLC ("GMM") and present how the combined entity may have appeared had the businesses actually been combined at the beginning of the periods presented. The pro forma combined information gives effect to the acquisition of GMM by Cardinal Bank from United Bank (the "Merger"), accounted for as a purchase, and is based on the payment of $17.0 million in cash in the Merger. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of GMM have been recorded on the Company's books at their estimated fair market values as of July 7, 2004, the date the Merger was completed. The amount by which the purchase price paid by the Company in the Merger exceeds the net fair value of GMM's assets acquired and liabilities assumed has been allocated to goodwill.
The pro forma combined condensed statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and for the year ended December 31, 2003 combine the results of operations of the Company and GMM for the respective periods. The pro forma combined condensed statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2004 is based on unaudited financial statements, and the pro forma combined condensed statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2003 is based on the audited financial statements of the Company and GMM.
The pro forma combined condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the historical financial statements and the related notes of the Company, which have been included in this filing. There are no adjustments necessary to the historical results of operations as a result of these transactions. The pro forma combined results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results that would actually have been attained if the Merger had occurred in the past or that may be attained in the future.
The unaudited pro forma combined financial information is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not indicate the financial results of the combined companies had the companies actually been combined at the beginning of the periods presented.
F-64
CARDINAL AND GEORGE MASON MORTGAGE
PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
Cardinal |
George Mason |
Pro Forma Adjustments |
Combined |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
||||||||||||
Interest income: | |||||||||||||
Loans receivable | $ | 16,851 | $ | 2,844 | $ | — | $ | 19,695 | |||||
Loans held for sale | — | 18,131 | — | 18,131 | |||||||||
Federal funds sold | 107 | — | (107 | )(A) | — | ||||||||
Investment securities | 7,509 | — | — | 7,509 | |||||||||
Other investments | 135 | 5 | — | 140 | |||||||||
Total interest income | 24,602 | 20,980 | (107 | ) | 45,475 | ||||||||
Interest expense: |
|||||||||||||
Deposits | 8,656 | — | — | 8,656 | |||||||||
Other borrowed funds | 773 | 8,647 | — | 9,420 | |||||||||
Total interest expense | 9,429 | 8,647 | — | 18,076 | |||||||||
Net interest income | 15,173 | 12,333 | (107 | ) | 27,399 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 1,001 | — | — | 1,001 | |||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 14,172 | 12,333 | (107 | ) | 26,398 | ||||||||
Non-interest income: | |||||||||||||
Service charges | 918 | — | — | 918 | |||||||||
Loan service charges | 382 | 1,896 | — | 2,278 | |||||||||
Investment fee income | 785 | — | — | 785 | |||||||||
Net gain on sales of loans | 282 | 23,524 | — | 23,806 | |||||||||
Net realized gain on investment securities available-for-sale | 1,364 | — | — | 1,364 | |||||||||
Other income | 98 | 4,026 | — | 4,124 | |||||||||
Total non-interest income | 3,829 | 29,446 | — | 33,275 | |||||||||
Non-interest expense: |
|||||||||||||
Salary and benefits | 6,797 | 13,351 | — | 20,148 | |||||||||
Occupancy | 1,559 | 1,651 | — | 3,210 | |||||||||
Professional fees | 1,113 | 1,184 | — | 2,297 | |||||||||
Depreciation | 1,030 | 831 | — | 1,861 | |||||||||
Other operating expenses | 4,856 | 4,329 | — | 9,185 | |||||||||
Total non-interest expense | 15,355 | 21,346 | — | 36,701 | |||||||||
Net income before income taxes | 2,646 | 20,433 | (107 | ) | 22,972 | ||||||||
Provision for income taxes | (3,508 | ) | 5,745 | 1,166 | (A) | 3,403 | |||||||
Net income | 6,154 | 14,688 | (1,273 | ) | 19,569 | ||||||||
Dividend to preferred shareholders | 495 | — | — | 495 | |||||||||
Net income to common shareholders | $ | 5,659 | $ | 14,688 | — | $ | 19,074 | ||||||
Earnings per common share: | |||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.55 | (C) | $ | 1.87 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.54 | (C) | $ | 1.66 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: | |||||||||||||
Basic | 10,218 | 10,218 | |||||||||||
Diluted | 11,468 | 11,468 |
See accompanying notes to pro forma combined condensed financial information.
F-65
CARDINAL AND GEORGE MASON MORTGAGE
PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
Cardinal |
George Mason |
Pro Forma Adjustments |
Combined |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
||||||||||||
Interest income: | |||||||||||||
Loans receivable | $ | 9,599 | $ | 1,116 | $ | — | $ | 10,715 | |||||
Loans held for sale | — | 4,434 | — | 4,434 | |||||||||
Federal funds sold | 47 | — | (47 | )(B) | — | ||||||||
Investment securities | 5,652 | — | — | 5,652 | |||||||||
Other investments | 84 | 2 | — | 86 | |||||||||
Total interest income | 15,382 | 5,552 | (47 | ) | 20,887 | ||||||||
Interest expense: |
|||||||||||||
Deposits | 4,780 | — | — | 4,780 | |||||||||
Other borrowed funds | 771 | 1,544 | — | 2,315 | |||||||||
Total interest expense | 5,551 | 1,544 | — | 7,095 | |||||||||
Net interest income | 9,831 | 4,008 | (47 | ) | 13,792 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 388 | — | — | 388 | |||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 9,443 | 4,008 | (47 | ) | 13,404 | ||||||||
Non-interest income: | |||||||||||||
Service charges | 502 | — | — | 502 | |||||||||
Loan service charges | 285 | 565 | — | 850 | |||||||||
Investment fee income | 336 | — | — | 336 | |||||||||
Net gain on sales of loans | 62 | 7,260 | — | 7,322 | |||||||||
Net realized gain on investment securities available-for-sale | 241 | — | — | 241 | |||||||||
Other income | 16 | 1,309 | — | 1,325 | |||||||||
Total non-interest income | 1,442 | 9,134 | — | 10,576 | |||||||||
Non-interest expense: |
|||||||||||||
Salary and benefits | 4,064 | 5,895 | — | 9,959 | |||||||||
Occupancy | 961 | 901 | — | 1,862 | |||||||||
Professional fees | 344 | 338 | — | 682 | |||||||||
Depreciation | 632 | 510 | — | 1,142 | |||||||||
Other operating expenses | 2,853 | 1,811 | — | 4,664 | |||||||||
Total non-interest expense | 8,854 | 9,455 | — | 18,309 | |||||||||
Net income before income taxes | 2,031 | 3,687 | (47 | ) | 5,671 | ||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 678 | 1,034 | 204 | (B) | 1,916 | ||||||||
Net income | 1,353 | 2,653 | (251 | ) | 3,755 | ||||||||
Earnings per common share: | |||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.08 | (C) | $ | 0.21 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.07 | (C) | $ | 0.20 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: | |||||||||||||
Basic | 17,931 | 17,931 | |||||||||||
Diluted | 18,326 | 18,326 |
See accompanying notes to pro forma combined condensed financial information.
F-66
Notes to Pro Forma Combined Condensed Financial Information
(Unaudited)
F-67
|
Page |
|
---|---|---|
Prospectus Summary | 1 | |
Risk Factors | 7 | |
Caution About Forward Looking Statements | 12 | |
Use of Proceeds | 13 | |
Dilution | 13 | |
Market for Common Stock and Dividends | 14 | |
Dividend Policy | 15 | |
Capitalization | 16 | |
Selected Historical Financial Data | 17 | |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 19 | |
Business | 61 | |
Management | 71 | |
Description of Securities | 80 | |
Government Supervision and Regulation | 85 | |
Underwriting | 93 | |
Legal Matters | 95 | |
Experts | 95 | |
Where You Can Find More Information | 96 | |
Index to Financial Statements | F-1 |
4,500,000 Shares
Common Stock
PROSPECTUS
RAYMOND JAMES
LEGG MASON WOOD WALKER
Incorporated
This ‘424B1’ Filing | Date | Other Filings | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
6/30/07 | 10-Q | |||
1/1/06 | ||||
12/31/05 | 10-K, 11-K | |||
5/17/05 | ||||
5/16/05 | ||||
Filed on: | 5/13/05 | 4 | ||
5/11/05 | ||||
5/9/05 | ||||
4/30/05 | ||||
4/29/05 | 8-K | |||
4/22/05 | 8-K, DEF 14A | |||
3/31/05 | 10-Q | |||
3/11/05 | ||||
3/1/05 | 8-K/A | |||
12/31/04 | 10-K, 11-K | |||
11/12/04 | ||||
9/30/04 | 10-Q, 10-Q/A, NT 10-Q | |||
7/7/04 | 8-K, 8-K/A | |||
6/30/04 | 10-Q | |||
4/15/04 | ||||
3/31/04 | 10-Q | |||
3/29/04 | ||||
3/1/04 | 3 | |||
1/14/04 | 8-K | |||
12/31/03 | 10KSB, 11-K, S-8 | |||
12/17/03 | S-1MEF | |||
6/30/03 | 10QSB, 11-K | |||
3/31/03 | 10KSB, 10QSB, DEF 14A | |||
1/1/03 | ||||
12/31/02 | 10KSB, 11-K/A | |||
7/1/02 | ||||
5/3/02 | ||||
3/1/02 | ||||
2/12/02 | ||||
1/1/02 | ||||
12/31/01 | 10KSB40 | |||
9/11/01 | ||||
12/31/00 | 10KSB, 10KSB/A, NT 10-K | |||
9/1/00 | 8-K, 8-K/A | |||
12/31/99 | 10KSB | |||
11/12/99 | ||||
8/2/99 | ||||
7/26/99 | ||||
1/1/99 | ||||
6/8/98 | ||||
11/24/97 | ||||
6/1/97 | ||||
List all Filings |