SEC Info℠ | Home | Search | My Interests | Help | Sign In | Please Sign In | ||||||||||||||||||||
As Of Filer Filing For·On·As Docs:Size Issuer Agent 9/19/07 RiskMetrics Group Inc S-1 19:8.7M Merrill Corp/New/FA |
Document/Exhibit Description Pages Size 1: S-1 Registration Statement (General Form) HTML 2.00M 2: EX-10.1 Material Contract HTML 853K 11: EX-10.10 Material Contract HTML 108K 12: EX-10.11 Material Contract HTML 676K 13: EX-10.12 Material Contract HTML 401K 14: EX-10.13 Material Contract HTML 286K 15: EX-10.14 Material Contract HTML 30K 16: EX-10.15 Material Contract HTML 549K 3: EX-10.2 Material Contract HTML 96K 4: EX-10.3 Material Contract HTML 240K 5: EX-10.4 Material Contract HTML 681K 6: EX-10.5 Material Contract HTML 97K 7: EX-10.6 Material Contract HTML 278K 8: EX-10.7 Material Contract HTML 123K 9: EX-10.8 Material Contract HTML 137K 10: EX-10.9 Material Contract HTML 137K 17: EX-21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant HTML 18K 18: EX-23.1 Consent of Experts or Counsel HTML 10K 19: EX-23.2 Consent of Experts or Counsel HTML 9K
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 19, 2007
Registration No. 333-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
RiskMetrics Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 6331 | 20-8175809 | ||
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number) |
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
Steven E. Friedman, Esq.
General Counsel
One Chase Manhattan Plaza, 44th Floor
New York, New York 10005
(212) 981-7475
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant's principal executive offices)
Copies to:
Richard H. Gilden, Esq. Ernest S. Wechsler, Esq. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP 1177 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 (212) 715-9100 |
Richard B. Aftanas, Esq. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Four Times Square New York, New York (212) 735-3000 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale of securities to the public: As soon as practicable after the registration statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. / /
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box. o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered |
Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price(1) |
Amount of Registration Fee |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value | $200,000,000 | $6,140 | ||
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We and the selling stockholders may not sell the securities described in this document until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is declared effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and neither we nor the selling stockholders are soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED SEPTEMBER 19, 2007
PROSPECTUS
Shares
RiskMetrics Group, Inc.
Common Stock
We are offering shares of our common stock and the selling stockholders named in this prospectus are offering shares of our common stock held by them. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares by the selling stockholders.
This is our initial public offering and there is currently no established trading market for our shares. We currently estimate that the initial public offering price will be between $ and $ per share.
The underwriters have an option to purchase a maximum of additional shares of common stock from us and the selling stockholders to cover over-allotments. The underwriters can exercise this right at any time within 30 days from the date of this prospectus.
We intend to apply for a listing of our common stock on the under the symbol " ."
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See "Risk Factors" beginning on page 14.
|
Price to Public |
Underwriting Discounts and Commissions |
Proceeds to Us |
Proceeds to Selling Stockholders |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Per Share | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||
Total | $ | $ | $ | $ |
Delivery of the shares of common stock will be made on or about , 2007.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
Credit Suisse | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Banc of America Securities LLC |
The date of this prospectus is , 2007.
|
|
|
---|
|
Page |
|
---|---|---|
About This Prospectus | ii | |
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements | ii | |
Industry and Market Data | iii | |
Prospectus Summary | 1 | |
Risk Factors | 14 | |
Use of Proceeds | 24 | |
Dividend Policy | 25 | |
Capitalization | 26 | |
Dilution | 27 | |
Unaudited Pro Forma Statements of Operations | 28 | |
Selected Consolidated Financial Information | 38 | |
Selected Consolidated Financial Information of ISS | 41 | |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 43 | |
Industry Overview | 75 | |
Business | 78 | |
Management | 97 | |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 102 | |
Corporate Governance and Sustainability | 107 | |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions | 109 | |
Principal and Selling Stockholders | 111 | |
Description of Capital Stock | 113 | |
Description of Certain Indebtedness | 115 | |
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations | 117 | |
Underwriting | 120 | |
Shares Eligible for Future Sale | 125 | |
Legal Matters | 127 | |
Experts | 127 | |
Where You Can Find More Information | 127 | |
Index to Financial Statements | F-1 |
You should rely only on the information contained in this document or to which we have referred you. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different. This document may only be used where it is legal to sell these securities. The information in this document may only be accurate on the date of this document.
Unless the context otherwise indicates or requires, as used in this prospectus, references to "we," "us," "our" or the "company" refer to RiskMetrics Group, Inc., its subsidiaries and predecessors. References to "RiskMetrics" refer only to our subsidiary, RiskMetrics Solutions, Inc. and its subsidiaries, references to "ISS" refer only to Institutional Shareholder Services Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries, and references to "CFRA" refer only to RMG-CFRA, LLC, formerly CFRA Holdings, LLC, and its subsidiary. References to our "clients" include each business unit, division or wholly-owned subsidiary of a parent company which has entered into a separate customer contract with us. References to "pro forma" financial information refers to financial information that gives effect to the acquisition of ISS and related financing as if they had occurred on January 1, 2006. A full discussion of the adjustments made to our U.S. GAAP financial information to arrive at the pro forma information is provided in this prospectus under the heading "Unaudited Pro Forma Statements of Operations," beginning on page 28.
In this prospectus, amounts are expressed in U.S. dollars and the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, or U.S. GAAP, except as otherwise indicated.
We own or have rights to use trademarks, trade names and service marks that we use in conjunction with the operation of our business, including, but not limited to: CGQ, CreditManager, DataMetrics, Governance Analytics, HedgePlatform, RiskManager, RiskMetrics and WealthBench. All other trademarks, trade names and service marks included in this prospectus are the property of their respective owners.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward looking statements. These forward looking statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies and prospects under the headings "Prospectus Summary," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Business." These statements are based on our current expectations and projections about future events and are identified by terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "expect," "scheduled," "plan," "seek," "intend," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "aim," "potential," or "continue" or the negative of those terms or other comparable terminology. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations are reasonable, we may not achieve our plans, intentions or expectations.
These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward looking statements we make in this prospectus are set forth in "Risk Factors." We undertake no obligation to update any of the forward looking statements after the date of this prospectus to conform those statements to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by applicable law.
You should read this prospectus and the documents that we reference in this prospectus and have filed as exhibits to the registration statement on Form S-1, of which this prospectus is a part, that we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results, levels of activity, performance and achievements may be different from what we expect and that these differences may be material. We qualify all of our forward looking statements by these cautionary statements.
ii
The market data and other statistical information used throughout this prospectus are based on independent industry publications. Some data are also based on our good faith estimates, which are derived from our review of internal surveys, as well as independent industry publications, government publications, reports by market research firms or other published independent sources. Although we believe that these sources are reliable, we have not independently verified the information. None of the independent industry publications used in this prospectus was prepared on our or our affiliates' behalf or at our expense.
In particular, the Gartner Reports described in this prospectus represent data, research, opinions or viewpoints published, as part of a syndicated subscription service available only to clients, by Gartner, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, and its subsidiaries, collectively referred to as Gartner, and are not representations of fact. The Gartner Reports do not constitute a specific guide to action and the reader of this prospectus assumes sole responsibility for his or her selection of, or reliance on, the Gartner Reports, or any excerpts thereof, in making any decision, including any investment decision. Each Gartner Report speaks as of its original publication date (and not as of the date of this prospectus) and the opinions expressed in the Gartner Reports are subject to change without notice. Gartner is not responsible, nor shall it have any liability, to us or to any reader of this prospectus for errors, omissions or inadequacies in, or for any interpretations of, or for any calculations based upon data contained in, the Gartner Reports, or any excerpts thereof.
iii
The following summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. It is not complete and does not contain all of the information that you should consider before investing in our common stock. You should read the entire prospectus carefully, especially the risks of investing in our common stock discussed under "Risk Factors" and our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.
Company Overview
We are a leading provider of risk management and corporate governance products and services to participants in the global financial markets. Our solutions enable our clients to better understand and manage the risks associated with their financial holdings, provide greater transparency to their internal and external constituencies, satisfy regulatory and reporting requirements and make more informed investment decisions. We provide our solutions across multiple asset classes, markets and geographies to a diverse client base, including asset managers, hedge funds, pension funds, banks, insurance companies, financial advisors and corporations. As of June 30, 2007, we had approximately 3,300 clients located in 50 countries. Among our clients are 74 of the 100 largest investment managers, 31 of the 50 largest mutual fund companies, 34 of the 50 largest hedge funds, each of the 10 largest global investment banks and 17 of the 30 OECD central banks.
Our company consists of two industry leading businesses: RiskMetrics and ISS. Together, our products and services comprise what we believe is the most comprehensive suite of risk management and corporate governance solutions available in our industry. Our combined products and services cover the market, credit, portfolio, governance, accounting, legal and environmental risks associated with our clients' financial holdings.
RiskMetrics. RiskMetrics is a leading global provider of multi-asset, position-based risk and wealth management solutions. We provide our clients with comprehensive, interactive solutions that allow them to measure and quantify portfolio risk across security types, geographies and markets. Our flagship RiskManager market risk system integrates consistently-modeled market data with our widely adopted analytical models and robust processing capabilities into a comprehensive risk reporting solution. Our clients access RiskManager through our secure web-based application or engage us to provide fully-outsourced risk reporting services. The breadth, performance and scalability of our RiskManager system is the result of nearly a decade of investment in research and development, which we believe provides us with a significant competitive advantage. RiskMetrics serves a diverse group of approximately 650 clients worldwide.
ISS. ISS is a leading provider of corporate governance and specialized financial research and analysis services to institutional investors and corporations around the world. Through ISS, which we acquired on January 11, 2007, we facilitate the voting of proxies by institutional investors and provide in-depth research and analysis to help inform their voting decisions and assess issuer-specific risk. We offer both global security coverage and fully-integrated, end-to-end solutions, from policy creation to comprehensive research, vote recommendations, reliable vote execution, post-vote disclosure and reporting and analytical tools. Our financial research and analysis services provide our clients with insights into many investment criteria that have become increasingly important to investors, including companies' environmental, social and governance attributes and accounting and compensation polices. ISS serves approximately 2,750 clients. On August 1, 2007, in order to further increase our range of specialized financial research and analysis products and services, we acquired CFRA, a leading forensic accounting research firm.
We sell our products and services primarily on an annual subscription basis and generally receive upfront subscription payments from our clients. On a pro forma basis for the year ended December 31, 2006, we generated revenues of $204.5 million, Adjusted EBITDA of $56.9 million and a net loss of
1
$4.8 million. For a discussion of Adjusted EBITDA, see the section below entitled "Summary Consolidated Financial Information and Other Data."
Our Market Opportunity
Our target market is a cross-section of global financial services firms. We also target other market participants, such as third-party advisors and corporations. We believe that a number of key market trends are driving the growth of our business and increasing the value of our solutions to our clients:
Growing Global Financial Markets and Investment Portfolio Complexity. Over the past ten years, assets under management, or AUM, have increased steadily on a worldwide basis. Additionally, the variety, complexity and geographic diversity of financial assets held by investors have expanded significantly, resulting in multi-asset class, multi-national portfolios often including derivatives and other structured products.
Increasing Demand for Transparency. Investors increasingly need to document their risk profile on a regular basis for both internal audiences, such as risk committees, as well as external constituencies, such as limited partners and regulators. In order to satisfy these demands, comprehensive risk management and proxy voting have become essential services.
Increasing Regulatory Requirements. Regulatory bodies around the world continue to drive change and create opportunities in the markets we serve. Portfolio risk reporting and measurement regulations, such as the European Union's Undertakings for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities, or UCITS III, U.S. Department of Labor proxy voting requirements and corporate governance-related regulations, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, have increased regulatory compliance requirements and have further emphasized the need for comprehensive risk management tools.
Increased Focus on Corporate Governance. During the past several years, there has been significant growth in the visibility of corporate governance and recognition of the risks associated with poor governance practices. Furthermore, investors are increasingly focusing on companies' environmental and social attributes when making investment and proxy voting decisions.
Increasing Demand for Outsourced Solutions. Many financial services firms are increasingly utilizing outsourced solutions that enable them to focus on their core competencies and provide greater capabilities on a more cost effective basis than their in-house systems. In particular, an increasing number of firms are utilizing risk management solutions from external vendors. These vendors provide independent risk reporting services, which are often requested by the financial services firms' clients.
Our Competitive Strengths
We intend to continue to capitalize on our market opportunity by leveraging the competitive strengths outlined below. We believe these strengths provide us with significant advantages in our markets:
Industry Leading Brands. We believe that each of our brands is among the most established and trusted names in its respective market. Trust, reliability and confidence are of paramount importance to our clients, as they rely on our solutions to help make critical investment decisions. Our products and services are widely recognized and used throughout our industry, and we believe we are helping to establish common standards for risk management and corporate governance. We believe that the prominence of our brands, combined with our long track record, proven capabilities and well-known and thorough reporting capabilities, have helped us to create and maintain our market leadership positions.
2
Comprehensive Market Coverage. Our products and services incorporate what we believe to be among the broadest data sets of any provider in our industry. RiskMetrics' database includes over four million active global securities across 150,000 issuers, spanning 200 countries, 220 exchanges, 11,000 global benchmarks and over 750,000 market data time series updated every business day. In addition, our analytical models cover almost all of the equity, fixed income and derivative securities held in our clients' portfolios. Similarly, in 2006 ISS provided proxy research and vote recommendations for more than 38,000 shareholder meetings across 100 countries and voted approximately 7.6 million ballots on behalf of our clients, representing almost 700 million shares.
Leading Market Risk Methodology. We are a leader in the multi-asset class risk management market. Our transparent risk methodology was originally published in 1994 and has evolved through more than a decade of research and development, client input and collaboration with the world's foremost financial institutions and leading academics. We believe our commitment to transparency and collaboration has resulted in our methodologies being among the financial industry's most studied, trusted and implemented frameworks for risk management.
Fully-Outsourced Solution. Increasingly, many of our RiskMetrics clients rely on us for a fully-outsourced risk reporting solution, which typically includes automated importation of client positions, matching of client positions with security terms and conditions data and automatic production of risk reports. Our solutions leverage our technology and data infrastructure, which has the capacity to process millions of positions and thousands of reports each night. Similarly, we can provide our ISS clients with a fully-outsourced proxy research and voting service through our Governance Analytics platform. This service typically includes standard benchmark guidelines or custom voting policies, comprehensive research coverage, and high volume, integrated electronic proxy voting and regulatory reporting.
Global, Diversified Client Base. We have a global footprint, which allows us to support our highly- diversified client base across numerous geographies with in-depth analysis based on local knowledge. As of June 30, 2007, our client base included approximately 2,100 financial institutions and 1,200 corporations and professional service organizations located in 50 countries. Among our clients are 74 of the 100 largest investment managers, 31 of the 50 largest mutual fund companies, 34 of the 50 largest hedge funds, each of the 10 largest global investment banks and 17 of the 30 OECD central banks. No client or group of affiliated clients represented more than 2.1% of our pro forma revenues in 2006 and our top 20 clients and their affiliates represented less than 13.1%. Our client base is geographically diverse as well, with 34% of our pro forma revenues in 2006 generated from sales to clients located outside of the Americas.
Attractive Business Model. We sell our services primarily on an annual subscription basis and receive upfront annual payments from our clients. In addition, we typically experience high recurring revenues as a percentage of total revenues and high renewal rates. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, our recurring revenue as a percentage of our total revenues, and renewal rates, were approximately 91% and 89%, respectively. We do not price our products and services based on our clients' assets under management. As a result, we are not subject to revenue fluctuations resulting from changes in our clients' AUM. Since many of our costs benefit from economies of scale, we have historically been able to add new clients with less than pro rata incremental expense. These factors, combined with our low capital expenditure requirements, have historically resulted in significant cash flow generation.
Distinct Corporate Culture. Our ability to develop new products and services has been, and will continue to be, crucial to keeping pace with evolving financial markets. Consequently, we believe that our success will continue to depend on the strength of our intellectual capital, and that our employees and distinct corporate culture provide us with significant competitive advantages. We work hard to retain our employees by ensuring that they have a challenging, rewarding and fun work environment.
3
We also encourage our employees to follow their instincts and develop new ideas, which has resulted in the development of many of our most important solutions. At the same time, we strive to engender a team spirit and sense of common purpose that we believe enables us to attract and retain talented employees. Finally, we believe that all of our employees should hold an ownership stake in our company since a broad-based employee ownership structure closely-aligns the incentives of our employees and stockholders.
Our Growth Strategy
Our growth strategy is to increase sales to our existing clients, to expand our client base and to extend and enhance our portfolio of risk management and corporate governance products and services through a multi-pronged approach:
Increase Sales to Existing Clients. A significant portion of our growth has been driven by our success in increasing the value of the products and services which we provide to our clients. We plan to broaden our relationships with our clients in the following ways:
Expand our Client Base. We plan to continue to pursue the following initiatives to further expand our client base:
Enhance and Extend our Products and Services. We plan to continue to augment our suite of products and services in the following ways:
4
Corporate Governance and Sustainability
We believe that strong corporate governance and sustainability policies serve to help maximize long-term shareholder value. We are committed to adopting progressive practices in these areas. Our key principles are outlined in the "Corporate Governance and Sustainability" section of this prospectus, beginning on page 107.
Risk Factors
Our business is subject to numerous risks. We urge you to carefully consider all the information presented in the "Risk Factors" section of this prospectus, beginning on page 14.
Additional Information
Our principal executive offices are located at One Chase Manhattan Plaza, 44th Floor, New York, New York 10005, and our telephone number is (212) 981-7475. Our website address is www.riskmetrics.com. Information contained on our website is not part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which it forms a part and is not incorporated herein by reference, and any reference to our website is intended to be an inactive textual reference only and is not intended to create any hypertext link.
5
Shares of common stock offered by us | shares | |||
Shares of common stock offered by the selling stockholders | shares | |||
Total shares of common stock offered | shares | |||
Shares of common stock to be outstanding immediately after this offering | shares | |||
Over-allotment option offered by us | shares | |||
Over-allotment option offered by the selling stockholders | shares | |||
Use of proceeds | We estimate that we will receive net proceeds from this offering of approximately $ million, based on an assumed public offering price of $ , the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover of this prospectus. We intend to use our proceeds from this offering to repay: | |||
• | $ million of outstanding indebtedness under our first lien revolving credit facility; | |||
• | $ million of outstanding indebtedness under our first lien term loan facility; and | |||
• | $ million of outstanding indebtedness under our second lien term loan facility; and | |||
for general corporate purposes, including working capital. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares by our selling stockholders in this offering. | ||||
Dividend Policy | We do not presently intend to declare dividends on our shares of common stock. See "Dividend Policy." | |||
Trading | Our shares of common stock are not currently listed on any national securities exchange. However, we intend to apply to the to list our shares under the symbol " ." | |||
Risk Factors | Investing in our common stock involves risks. See "Risk Factors." |
Except as otherwise noted, all information in this prospectus:
The number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding immediately after this offering excludes:
On May 1, 2007, we effected a 2.5 to 1 stock split. Except where indicated otherwise, all share numbers included in this prospectus have been adjusted to reflect this stock split.
6
Summary Consolidated Financial Information and Other Data
The summary consolidated statements of operations data presented for each of the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and the summary consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 were derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 and the summary consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 were derived from our audited consolidated financial statements which are not included in this prospectus. The summary consolidated unaudited statements of operations data presented for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 and the summary consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2007 were derived from our unaudited consolidated interim financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2007. The as adjusted consolidated balance sheet data give effect to the sale by us of shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial offering price of $ per share, after applying the estimated net proceeds thereof, as if this offering was completed on June 30, 2007.
On January 11, 2007, we acquired ISS. The consolidated statement of operations data for the six months ended June 30, 2007 includes the impact of the acquisition of ISS beginning on January 12, 2007. The consolidated statement of operations data for the prior period does not include the impact of the acquisition of ISS. The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and "Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results Operations" included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data
|
Year ended December 31, |
Six months ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2006 |
2007 |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(1) | $ | 29,579 | $ | 50,446 | $ | 71,699 | $ | 93,637 | $ | 101,236 | $ | 50,919 | $ | 110,515 | |||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs of revenues | 7,019 | 12,359 | 18,909 | 23,704 | 25,618 | 12,381 | 34,682 | ||||||||||||||||
Research and development expenses | 7,477 | 10,158 | 14,095 | 16,099 | 21,202 | 10,903 | 15,045 | ||||||||||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses | 10,020 | 10,827 | 13,222 | 12,257 | 14,977 | 7,333 | 16,412 | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 6,959 | 9,716 | 9,328 | 11,492 | 12,852 | 5,818 | 14,031 | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 1,191 | 2,627 | 5,170 | 3,551 | 4,081 | 2,025 | 3,323 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | — | 659 | 1,079 | 2,713 | 770 | 770 | 8,624 | ||||||||||||||||
Impairment of goodwill | — | — | — | 361 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment | — | 119 | 1,659 | 1,577 | 15 | 11 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses(2) | 32,666 | 46,465 | 63,462 | 71,754 | 79,515 | 39,241 | 92,119 | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | (3,087 | ) | 3,981 | 8,237 | 21,883 | 21,721 | 11,678 | 18,396 | |||||||||||||||
Interest, dividend and investment income (loss), net | 593 | 432 | 597 | 1,438 | 2,500 | 966 | (16,839 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes | (2,494 | ) | 4,413 | 8,834 | 23,321 | 24,221 | 12,644 | 1,557 | |||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 94 | 252 | (1,048 | ) | 7,640 | 8,200 | 4,281 | 812 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (2,588 | ) | $ | 4,161 | $ | 9,882 | $ | 15,681 | $ | 16,021 | $ | 8,363 | $ | 745 | ||||||||
7
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
|
As of December 31, |
|
As Adjusted as of June 30, 2007 |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
As of June 30, 2007 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
|||||||||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 22,804 | $ | 7,634 | $ | 12,042 | $ | 10,966 | $ | 37,313 | $ | 21,460 | ||||||||
Short-term investments | 2,763 | 24,095 | 46,453 | 69,296 | 68,071 | 21,125 | ||||||||||||||
Goodwill and intangibles, net | — | 4,722 | 3,844 | 770 | — | 584,512 | ||||||||||||||
Total assets | 39,444 | 59,699 | 89,833 | 115,293 | 136,947 | 725,171 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred revenue | 17,782 | 31,322 | 45,996 | 53,744 | 58,842 | 101,408 | ||||||||||||||
Total debt, including current portion | — | — | — | — | — | 424,250 | ||||||||||||||
Stockholders' equity | 14,229 | 18,514 | 30,074 | 44,270 | 56,498 | 125,456 |
Other Financial and Operating Data
The financial and operating data below sets forth supplementary information that we believe is useful for investors in evaluating our underlying operations:
|
Year ended December 31, |
Six months ended June 30, |
||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2006 |
2007 |
|||||||||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands, except for percentages) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA(3) | $ | (1,896 | ) | $ | 7,542 | $ | 18,727 | $ | 30,085 | $ | 30,223 | $ | 16,409 | $ | 32,886 | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 6,496 | $ | 19,489 | $ | 31,115 | $ | 30,035 | $ | 36,082 | $ | 3,067 | $ | 1,134 | ||||||||
Capital expenditures | (1,268 | ) | (2,871 | ) | (4,237 | ) | (6,217 | ) | (3,724 | ) | (1,068 | ) | (3,587 | ) | ||||||||
Free cash flow(4) | $ | 5,228 | $ | 16,618 | $ | 26,878 | $ | 23,818 | $ | 32,358 | $ | 1,999 | $ | (2,453 | ) | |||||||
Operating Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Annualized contract value (at period end)(5) | $ | 29,821 | $ | 53,155 | $ | 76,884 | $ | 94,115 | $ | 98,916 | $ | 86,190 | $ | 209,230 | ||||||||
Recurring revenue as a percentage of total revenue(6) | 92.9 | % | 93.3 | % | 94.3 | % | 94.2 | % | 96.6 | % | 95.4 | % | 91.3 | % |
Notes to Summary Consolidated Financial Information and Other Data
8
recorded $3.6 million, $1.9 million and $2.5 million of stock-based compensation expense in the year ended December 31, 2006 and the six months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2007, respectively.
We present Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental performance measure because we believe that this measure provides our board of directors, management and investors with additional information to measure our performance, provide comparisons from period to period by excluding potential differences caused by variations in capital structure (affecting interest expense), tax position (such as the impact on periods of changes in effective tax rates or net operating losses), the age and book depreciation of fixed assets (affecting relative depreciation expense), acquisitions (affecting amortization expense) and compensation plans (affecting stock-based compensation expense).
Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of our financial performance under U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income, operating income or any other performance measures derived in accordance with U.S. GAAP or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of our profitability or liquidity.
We understand that, although Adjusted EBITDA is frequently used by securities analysts, lenders and others in their evaluation of companies, Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for an analysis of our results as reported under U.S. GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
9
The table below sets forth a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss) on our historical results:
|
Year ended December 31, |
Six months ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2006 |
2007 |
||||||||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (2,588 | ) | $ | 4,161 | $ | 9,882 | $ | 15,681 | $ | 16,021 | $ | 8,363 | $ | 745 | ||||||
Interest (income) expense, net | (593 | ) | (432 | ) | (597 | ) | (1,438 | ) | (2,500 | ) | (966 | ) | 16,839 | ||||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense | 94 | 252 | (1,048 | ) | 7,640 | 8,200 | 4,281 | 812 | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 1,191 | 2,627 | 5,170 | 3,551 | 4,081 | 2,025 | 3,323 | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | — | 659 | 1,079 | 2,713 | 770 | 770 | 8,624 | ||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation(a) | — | 156 | 2,582 | — | 3,636 | 1,925 | 2,541 | ||||||||||||||
Impairment of goodwill(b) | — | — | — | 361 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment(c) | — | 119 | 1,659 | 1,577 | 15 | 11 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | (1,896 | ) | $ | 7,542 | $ | 18,727 | $ | 30,085 | $ | 30,223 | $ | 16,409 | $ | 32,886 | ||||||
10
Summary Pro Forma Financial Information and Other Data
The pro forma financial information for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 was prepared as though ISS had been acquired on January 1, 2006. The pro forma as adjusted financial information for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 give further effect to the sale by us of shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial offering price of $ per share and the application of the estimated net proceeds thereof as if this offering was completed on January 1, 2006. See "Unaudited Pro Forma Statements of Operations." The pro forma financial information does not give effect to our acquisition of CFRA on August 1, 2007, since it is not considered a significant subsidiary under applicable SEC regulations.
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
Six months ended June 30, 2006 |
Six months ended June 30, 2007 |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pro Forma |
Pro Forma As Adjusted |
Pro Forma |
Pro Forma As Adjusted |
Pro Forma |
Pro Forma As Adjusted |
||||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 204,505 | $ | 101,339 | $ | 113,842 | ||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Costs of revenues | 65,551 | 33,879 | 37,032 | |||||||||||||
Research and development expenses | 27,272 | 14,050 | 15,642 | |||||||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses | 30,705 | 14,269 | 17,235 | |||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 29,530 | 14,220 | 26,061 | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 6,114 | 3,042 | 3,525 | |||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 19,101 | 9,935 | 9,165 | |||||||||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment | 15 | 11 | 2 | |||||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses(1) | 178,288 | 89,406 | 108,662 | (2c) | ||||||||||||
Income from operations | 26,217 | 11,933 | 5,180 | |||||||||||||
Interest, dividend and investment income (loss), net | (34,221 | ) | (17,058 | ) | (19,094 | )(2d) | ||||||||||
Loss before income taxes | (8,004 | ) | (5,125 | ) | (13,914 | ) | ||||||||||
Benefit for income taxes | (3,202 | ) | (2,050 | ) | (5,566 | ) | ||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (4,802 | ) | $ | (3,075 | ) | $ | (8,348 | ) | |||||||
11
Other Financial and Operating Data
The table below sets forth our pro forma Adjusted EBITDA, annualized contract value and recurring revenue as a percentage of total revenue (as defined in the notes below):
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
Six months ended June 30, 2006 |
Six months ended June 30, 2007 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pro Forma |
Pro Forma |
Pro Forma |
|||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands, except for percentages) |
|||||||||
Financial Data | ||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA(2) | $ | 56,898 | $ | 27,753 | $ | 33,767 | ||||
Operating Data |
||||||||||
Annualized contract value(3) | $ | 190,406 | $ | 173,040 | $ | 209,230 | ||||
Recurring revenue as a percentage of total revenue(4) | 91.0 | % | 89.7 | % | 91.3 | % |
Notes to Summary Pro Forma Financial Information and Other Data
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
Six months ended June 30, 2006 |
Six months ended June 30, 2007 |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pro Forma |
Pro Forma As Adjusted |
Pro Forma |
Pro Forma As Adjusted |
Pro Forma |
Pro Forma As Adjusted |
|||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
||||||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (4,802 | ) | $ | (3,075 | ) | $ | (8,348 | ) | ||||||
Interest (income) expense, net(d) | 34,221 | 17,058 | 19,094 | ||||||||||||
Income tax benefit | (3,202 | ) | (2,050 | ) | (5,566 | ) | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 6,114 | 3,042 | 3,525 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 19,101 | 9,935 | 9,165 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation(a) | 5,451 | 2,832 | 2,541 | ||||||||||||
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment(b) | 15 | 11 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition-related expenses(c) | — | — | 13,354 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 56,898 | $ | 27,753 | $ | 33,767 | |||||||||
12
|
Total Non- Recurring Expenses |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Operating costs and expenses: | ||||
Costs of revenues | $ | 867 | ||
Research and development expenses | 226 | |||
Selling and marketing expenses | 281 | |||
General and administrative expenses | 11,980 | |||
Total Non-recurring expenses |
$ |
13,354 |
Non-recurring expenses consists of: a transaction fee of $6.7 million, non-cash stock based compensation of $3.0 million, cash compensation and other charges of $5.4 million, partially offset by a deferred rent credit of $1.7 million.
13
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as well as the other information in this prospectus, before deciding whether to invest in our common stock. If any of the events highlighted in the following risks actually occurs, our business, results of operations or financial condition would likely suffer. In such an event, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risk Factors Related to our Business and Industry
We may experience difficulty in integrating our recent acquisitions of ISS and CFRA into our operations and we may not realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisitions.
Our acquisition of ISS, which was consummated on January 11, 2007, and our acquisition of CFRA, which was consummated on August 1, 2007, each involve a number of special risks, including some or all of the following:
The expansion of our business and operations resulting from the ISS and CFRA acquisitions may strain our administrative, operational and financial resources. The successful integration of ISS and CFRA into our company will require, among other things, the development of and coordination of their lines of proxy voting and research, financial research and analysis and corporate governance products and services; the adaptation of their technology, information systems and other processes; and the retention of their clients. The integration process could create a number of potential challenges and adverse consequences for us, including the possible unexpected loss of key employees. Since the consummation of the ISS acquisition, some members of the ISS management team, including its former chief executive officer, have left our company. Richard Leggett, the chief executive officer of CFRA prior to its acquisition, has recently become head of our ISS business, and we have filled other openings at ISS through internal promotion. These types of challenges and uncertainties could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we may acquire other businesses. In the event that we consummate such transactions, we may be subject to similar risks.
We have incurred significant indebtedness which could affect our ability to finance our operations, pursue desirable business opportunities or successfully run our businesses in the future.
We borrowed $425.0 million in connection with our acquisition of ISS. This indebtedness is secured and guaranteed by us and most of our subsidiaries. The annual cost to service this indebtedness is approximately $35.6 million of cash interest costs and approximately $3.0 million of
14
annual required principal repayments, plus an additional annual prepayment generally equal to fifty percent of our excess cash flow (as such term is defined in the credit facility agreements) for such year. We are also required to make certain prepayments of this indebtedness in the event that we issue or incur additional indebtedness or sell specified assets. This indebtedness has created substantial demands upon our available cash to pay principal and interest. In order to finance our CFRA acquisition, we also borrowed $15 million under our revolving credit facility on July 31, 2007. Our leverage and debt service obligations could have important consequences to you, including the following:
We must recruit and retain skilled management and other key employees to succeed in our business.
Our strategic direction and growth, as well as the development, maintenance and support of our products, are dependent upon the knowledge, experience and ability of our highly skilled, educated and trained employees. Accordingly, the success of our business depends to a significant extent upon the continued service of our executive officers and other key management, research, sales and marketing, information technology and other technical personnel. In particular, M. Ethan Berman, our chief executive officer and a key participant in the formulation of our growth strategy to date, has been instrumental to our success. The loss of Mr. Berman could have a serious negative effect on the future development of our business, particularly if we are not able to implement an effective succession plan. We do not have employment agreements with any of our executive officers.
We believe that success in our business will continue to be based upon the strength of our intellectual capital. Consequently, we must hire and retain employees with the technical expertise and industry knowledge necessary to continue to develop our services and effectively manage our growing sales and marketing organization to ensure the growth of our operations. The market for highly skilled employees remains very competitive and we compete for talent with some of the largest and best-capitalized financial institutions and corporations in the world.
If we are unable to retain and recruit a sufficient number of these employees at all levels, our ability to maintain and grow our business could be negatively impacted.
We face competition that may cause price reductions or loss of market share.
We are subject to competitive conditions in all aspects of our business. ISS competes with firms such as Broadridge (formerly ADP Proxy Services) (which provides proxy voting services), Glass, Lewis & Co. (which provides research, voting recommendation and voting execution services) and
15
Proxy Governance, Inc. (which provides research, voting recommendation and voting execution services). ISS also competes with local niche proxy voting and research providers in certain international markets. In addition, RiskMetrics competes with firms such as Bear Stearns' Bear Measurisk unit, BlackRock Inc.'s BlackRock Solutions unit, DST Systems Inc., Fimalac S.A.'s Algorithmics unit, Moody Corporation's KMV unit, MSCI Inc.'s Barra unit and SunGard Data Systems Inc. We also face competition from:
Intense competition could harm us by causing, among other things, price reductions, reduced margins and loss of market share. We could further be required to reduce the fees we charge clients as a result of competitive pressure, which could result in lower revenues and profitability.
Our ability to compete, succeed and generate profits will depend on our ability to obtain data from third-party vendors on commercially reasonable terms.
We currently obtain data for use in our products and services from a number of third-party vendors. Termination of one or more of our significant data agreements or exclusion from, or restricted use of a data provider's information could decrease the available information for us to use and offer our clients and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, ISS relies on our data feed agreement with Broadridge, formerly ADP Proxy Services, which allows for many ballots to be received and proxy votes to be made electronically, minimizing the manual aspects of the proxy voting process and limiting the risk of error inherent in the manual process. If our data feed agreement with Broadridge was terminated, we would have to incur significant expenses in order to input our clients' voting instructions directly into Broadridge's proprietary electronic voting systems and our business and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.
Some of our competitors could enter into exclusive contracts with our data suppliers. If our competitors enter into such exclusive contracts, we may be precluded from receiving certain data from these suppliers or restricted in our use of such data, which would give our competitors an advantage. Such exclusive contracts would hinder our ability to provide our clients with the data they prefer, which could lead to a decrease in our client base and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
In addition, some data suppliers may seek to increase licensing fees for providing their content to us. If we are unable to renegotiate acceptable licensing arrangements with these data suppliers or find alternative sources of equivalent content, we may be required to reduce our profit margins or experience a reduction in our market share.
Any perceived conflicts of interest in our business could harm our reputation and business.
ISS' institutional clients rely on us to provide them with informed vote recommendations, benchmark proxy voting guidelines and unbiased analyses of companies' environmental, social and governance attributes. The institutional clients of both our RiskMetrics and ISS businesses, particularly hedge funds and more active institutional investors, may have material economic and other interests in the corporations on which we provide proxy analyses and ratings or which are the subject of our financial research and analysis products and services. In some cases these institutional clients pay us a significant amount of money for our RiskMetrics or ISS solutions and, accordingly, there may be a perception that we might advocate a particular position or provide research that supports a particular conclusion with respect to a corporation in order to satisfy the unique economic or other interests of a
16
particular institutional client. As a result, institutional clients, competitors and other market participants could raise questions about our ability to provide unbiased services, which could harm our reputation.
Through our ISS Corporate Services subsidiary, we provide products and services to corporate clients who often use our services to learn about and improve their governance practices. Accordingly, there may be a perceived conflict of interest between the services we provide to institutional clients and the services provided to certain corporate clients. For example, when we provide corporate governance services to a corporate client and at the same time provide proxy vote recommendations to institutional clients regarding that corporation's proxy items, there may be a perception that we may treat that corporation more favorably due to its use of our services.
The safeguards that we have implemented may not be adequate to manage these apparent conflicts of interest, and clients or competitors may question the integrity of our services. In the event that we fail to adequately manage these perceived conflicts of interest, we could incur reputational damage, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Our businesses rely heavily on electronic delivery systems and the Internet and any failures, disruptions or slowdowns may adversely affect our ability to serve our clients.
Technological factors may affect our ability to deliver our products and services to our clients. We depend heavily on the capacity, reliability and security of our electronic delivery systems and the Internet. Access to our products and services, and to data for our products and services, via the Internet involves security, availability, architectural compatibility and reliability risks. Our ability to effectively use the Internet may be impaired due to infrastructure failures, service outages at third party Internet providers or increased government regulation. If failures, disruptions or slowdowns of our electronic delivery systems or the Internet occur, our ability to distribute our products and services effectively and to serve our clients may be adversely affected. If our products and/or the technology foundations upon which they are built and delivered, have design or implementation flaws, or otherwise malfunction and cause harm to clients or third parties, claims may be brought against us.
Our revenues and earnings depend substantially upon conditions in the financial services industry, and a significant or prolonged downturn in the financial services industry could decrease demand for our products and services.
Our revenues are principally derived from the provision of risk management and corporate governance products and services to the financial services industry. Any downturn in the financial services industry or the global financial markets could decrease demand for our products and services and negatively impact our financial condition. For example, a prolonged downturn in the global financial markets could cause a number of our clients and potential clients to go out of business or search for lower cost alternatives to our products and services.
Similarly, we are exposed to other market trends in the financial services industry. Consolidation in the financial services industry could reduce our existing client base and the number of potential clients. This may negatively impact our ability to generate future growth and may reduce demand for our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Changes in the legislative, regulatory and corporate environments in which our clients operate may adversely impact our financial results.
ISS' historical growth has been due, in large part, to increased regulatory requirements, highly visible corporate scandals, increased shareholder activism and corporate chief executive officers and boards of directors that are increasingly concerned about, and responsive to, shareholder concerns. To
17
the extent that any of these trends change, the demand for our products and services could be reduced, and this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operation. In addition, beginning with the 2004 publication of International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework, or Basel II, which created an international standard for risk management at banks, and continuing with the adoption of Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities, or the UCITS III directives, which require European Union member countries to adopt policies governing investment managers' risk practices, a portion of the growth of RiskMetrics has been due to regulatory requirements. To the extent these regulations change or are not extended to other markets, our business, financial condition and results of operation could be materially adversely affected.
Changes in government regulations relating to our business could materially adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
The financial services industry is subject to extensive regulation at the federal and state levels, as well as by foreign governments. It is very difficult to predict the future impact of the legislative and regulatory requirements affecting our business and our clients' businesses. In particular, as a registered investment advisor, our ISS subsidiary is subject to the requirements and regulations of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The Investment Advisers Act relates to, among other things, fiduciary duties, recordkeeping and reporting requirements, disclosure requirements, limitations on agency and principal transactions between an advisor and advisory clients, as well as general anti-fraud prohibitions. We may also be adversely affected as a result of new or revised legislation or regulations imposed by the SEC, other U.S. or foreign governmental regulatory authorities or self-regulatory organizations that supervise the financial markets around the world. In addition, we may be adversely affected by changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules by these governmental authorities and self-regulatory organizations. It is impossible to determine the extent of the impact of any new laws, regulations or initiatives that may be proposed, or whether any of the proposals will become law. The introduction of any new laws or regulations could make compliance more difficult and expensive and affect the manner in which we conduct business.
Our growth may place significant strain on our management and other resources.
We have experienced significant growth in the scope of our operations and the number of our employees. This growth has placed, and will continue to place, significant demands on our management, as well as our financial and operational resources. We must continue to improve our operational, financial, management, legal and compliance processes and information systems to keep pace with the growth of our business. Continued growth will likely increase our challenges involved in:
If we cannot scale and manage our business appropriately, we may not be able to timely execute our business strategies and our business and financial results may be adversely affected.
We are exposed to certain liabilities as a result of our products and services.
Our products and services support the investment or risk analysis processes of clients that collectively manage trillions of dollars in assets. Our subscription and consulting agreements have
18
provisions designed to limit our exposure to potential liability claims brought by our clients or other third parties based on the use of our products and services. However, these provisions could be invalidated by unfavorable judicial decisions or by federal, state, foreign or local laws. Use of our products and services for investment and/or risk management or research, recommendations, voting and other corporate governance processes creates the risk that our clients, the parties whose funds are managed by our clients or the companies to which our research or recommendations relate, may pursue claims against us for significant dollar amounts. Any such claim, even if the outcome were to be ultimately favorable to us, would involve a significant commitment of management, personnel, financial and other resources. In addition, these sorts of claims and lawsuits could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Any failure to ensure and protect the confidentiality of client data could adversely affect our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Many of our products and services involve the exchange of information with our clients through a variety of media, including the Internet. We rely on a complex network of process and software controls to protect the confidentiality of client data, such as client portfolio data that may be provided to us or hosted on our systems. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, including any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or if we experience difficulties in implementation of our internal controls, client data could be misappropriated. Such internal control inadequacies could damage our reputation, expose us to litigation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We have engaged in hedging transactions and may engage in other hedging transactions which involve risks that could have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
In February 2007, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements to reduce our interest rate risk and to manage interest expense, and we may engage in similar transactions in the future. As of June 30, 2007, the interest rate swaps had notional amounts of $318.2 million and a fair value of $2.5 million. Interest rate swaps effectively change variable-rate debt obligations either to fixed-rate debt obligations or to variable-rate debt obligations based on a different index. Interest rate caps effectively limit the maximum interest on variable-rate debt obligations. Developing an effective strategy for dealing with movements in interest rates is complex, and no strategy can completely insulate us from risks associated with such fluctuations. In addition, a counterparty to a derivative instrument could default on its obligation thereby exposing us to credit risk. Further, we may have to repay certain costs, such as transaction fees or brokerage costs, if a derivative instrument is terminated by us. Finally, our interest rate risk management activities could expose us to substantial losses if interest rates move materially differently from our expectations. As a result, our economic hedging activities may not effectively manage our interest rate sensitivity or have the desired beneficial impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights, our competitive position could be harmed.
Our success and ability to compete depend in large part upon our ability to protect our proprietary technology. We rely primarily on a combination of trade secret, copyright and trademark rights, as well as contractual protections and technical measures, to protect our products and processes. Existing trade secret, copyright and trademark laws offer only limited protection, and third parties may be able to successfully challenge, oppose, invalidate or circumvent our intellectual property rights.
We may fail or be unable to obtain or maintain adequate protections for certain of our intellectual property and we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken to protect our proprietary information will be sufficient. For example, when we enter a new geographic market or introduce a new product brand, our existing trademark or service mark of choice may not be available. Further, the fact that we
19
have registered trademarks is not an assurance that other companies may not use similar names. We also typically enter into non-disclosure agreements with our employees and consultants who are involved in our research and development activities or who have access to any of our confidential information. However, if an employee breaches his or her non-disclosure agreement and reveals a trade secret, we could lose the trade secret protection. It may be very difficult to ascertain if a former employee is inappropriately using or disclosing our proprietary information. Additionally, the enforceability of our license and non-disclosure agreements and the remedies available to us in the event of a breach vary due to the many different jurisdictions in which our clients and employees are located. Any such failure or inability to obtain or maintain adequate protection of our intellectual property rights for any reason could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Monitoring and protecting our intellectual property rights is difficult and costly. From time to time, we may be required to initiate litigation or other action to enforce our intellectual property rights, establish their validity or enforce non-compete clauses in our employment arrangements. Any action could result in substantial cost and diversion of resources and management attention, and we may not be successful in preventing unauthorized use of our technology or other proprietary rights, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as do the laws of the United States.
If third parties claim that we are in violation of their intellectual property rights, it could have a negative impact on our results of operations and ability to compete.
Third parties may claim we infringe upon their intellectual property rights. If any third parties were to obtain a patent on a risk analysis model or product service delivery mechanism, we could be sued for infringement. Furthermore, there is always a risk that third parties will sue us for infringement or misappropriation of other intellectual property rights, such as trademarks, copyrights or trade secrets.
Any such infringement claims, even those without merit, could:
Any royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. A successful claim of infringement against us in connection with a third party's use of our technology could result in our being required to pay significant damages, enter into costly license or royalty agreements or stop the sale of certain products or services, any of which could have a negative impact on our operating profits and harm our future prospects. Furthermore, if it is determined that our products or services infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, our clients could be enjoined from continuing to use our products, and we may be required to indemnify our clients for any damages they suffer.
Operations outside the United States involve certain risks which may adversely affect us.
A significant portion of our business is conducted outside the United States. For the year ended December 31, 2006, approximately 34% of our pro forma revenues were generated from sales to clients
20
outside of the Americas. In addition, 32% of our combined employee base was located in our offices outside of the United States, including approximately 150 employees located in our Manila, Philippines office. As a result, we are subject to certain risks inherent in doing business in some jurisdictions outside the United States, including the following:
These risks could affect our ability to continue to expand our business outside the United States, which may adversely affect our ability to increase our revenues and to service our non-U.S. clients.
Risk Factors Related to this Offering
There has been no prior public market for our common stock, and an active trading market in our stock may not develop or be sustained.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock. An active trading market in our common stock may not develop or be sustained after this offering. Although we intend to list our common stock on the , we do not know whether third parties will find our common stock to be attractive or whether firms will be interested in making a market for our stock. The initial public offering price of our common stock will be determined through negotiations between us and the representatives of the underwriters and thus may not be indicative of the market price for our common stock after this offering. Consequently, you may not be able to resell your shares above the initial public offering price and may suffer a loss on your investment.
Our stock price may be volatile and may be affected by market conditions beyond our control, and you may be unable to resell your shares at or above the offering price or at all.
The initial public offering price of the common stock offered hereby will be determined through our negotiations with the underwriters and may not be indicative of the market price of the common stock after this offering. The market price of our common stock after this offering will be subject to significant fluctuations in response to, among other factors:
21
In addition, if the market for stocks in our industry, or the stock market in general, experiences a loss of investor confidence, the trading price of our common stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, financial condition or results of operations. If any of the foregoing occurs, it could cause our stock price to fall and may expose us to lawsuits that, even if unsuccessful, could be costly to defend and a distraction to management.
Future sales of shares of our common stock by our affiliates and other stockholders or by us may adversely affect the price, and the future exercise of options may lower the price of shares of our common stock.
We cannot predict what effect, if any, future sales of shares of our common stock, or the availability of shares for future sale, may have on the trading price of our common stock. Future sales of shares of our common stock by our existing stockholders and other stockholders or by us, or the perception that such sales may occur, could adversely affect the market price of shares of our common stock and may make it more difficult for you to sell your shares of our common stock at a time and price that you determine appropriate.
We will incur additional costs as a result of becoming a public company.
As a result of our becoming a public company, we will be subjected to significant additional regulatory and reporting requirements, including under the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Sarbanes-Oxley, and listed company rules. We will incur additional costs on an ongoing basis in order to comply with these additional requirements. These costs include those related to expanding our internal control and compliance functions, recruiting and retaining additional staff, and engaging outside advisors. The historical consolidated financial information in this prospectus does not reflect the added costs that we expect to incur as a public company or the resulting changes that will have occurred in our capital structure and operations. For more information, see our historical consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud.
Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud. Any inability to provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud could harm our business. Sarbanes-Oxley requires management and our auditors to evaluate and assess the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. We will be required to adhere to these requirements by the end of the year following the one in which we become a public company. Sarbanes-Oxley requirements may be modified, supplemented or amended from time to time. Implementing these changes may take a significant amount of time and may require specific compliance training of our personnel. In the future, we may discover areas of our internal controls that need improvement. If our independent registered public accounting firm or we discover a material weakness, the disclosure of that fact, even if quickly remedied, could reduce the market's confidence in our financial statements and harm our stock price. We may not be able to effectively and timely implement necessary control changes and employee training to ensure continued compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley and other regulatory and reporting requirements. Our rapid growth in recent periods, and our possible future expansion through acquisitions, present challenges to maintain the internal control and disclosure control standards applicable to public companies. If we fail to maintain effective internal controls, we could be subject to regulatory scrutiny and sanctions and investors could lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports. We may not be able to fully comply with the requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley or that management or our independent registered public accounting firm will conclude that our internal controls are effective in future periods.
22
Purchasers in this offering will experience immediate and substantial dilution in the book value of their investment.
We expect the initial public offering price of our common stock in this offering will be substantially higher than the net tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately after this offering. Therefore, if you purchase our common stock in this offering, you will incur an immediate dilution of $ in net tangible book value per share from the price you paid, based on an assumed initial offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus). The exercise of outstanding options will result in further dilution. For a further description of the dilution you will experience immediately after this offering, see the section entitled "Dilution."
Upon closing of this offering, our principal stockholders will still have the ability to significantly influence our business, which may be disadvantageous to other shareholders and adversely affect the price of our shares of common stock.
Upon closing of this offering, M. Ethan Berman, our chief executive officer and a director, investment entities affiliated with General Atlantic LLC, investment entities affiliated with Spectrum Equity Investors IV, L.P. and investment entities affiliated with TCV V, L.P. will, collectively, beneficially own approximately % of our outstanding shares of common stock ( % if the underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full). As a result, these stockholders, if they act together, will have the ability to exert substantial influence over all matters requiring approval by our shareholders, including the election and removal of directors, any proposed merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets and other corporate transactions. These stockholders may have interests that are different from ours or other investors.
Our officers, directors and principal stockholders could delay or prevent an acquisition or merger of our company even if the transaction would benefit other stockholders. Moreover, this concentration of share ownership may make it difficult for shareholders to replace management. This concentration could be disadvantageous to other shareholders with interests different from those of our officers, directors and principal stockholders and the price of our shares of common stock could be adversely affected.
We may allocate the proceeds of this offering in ways with which you or other stockholders may not agree.
We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering to repay the certain indebtedness outstanding under our credit facilities and for general corporate purposes, including working capital. Consequently, other than those net proceeds which will be used to repay portions of our outstanding indebtedness, our management will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds from this offering and may apply them in ways with which you or other stockholders may not agree. Failure by our management to apply these funds effectively could adversely affect our ability to continue to maintain and expand our business.
23
We estimate that we will receive net proceeds from this offering of approximately $ million, based on an assumed public offering price of $ , the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover of this prospectus, after payment of underwriters' discounts and commissions and our payment of the expenses of this offering estimated to be $ . We intend to use our proceeds from this offering as follows:
In February 2007, we entered into two interest-rate swap agreements to reduce our interest rate risk and to manage interest expense. By entering into these agreements, we converted the LIBOR component of our annual interest rates with respect to 75.0% of our outstanding first lien term loan facility and second lien term loan facility to a fixed rate of 5.099% per annum. As of June 30, 2007, the interest rate swaps had notional amounts of $318.2 million and a fair value of $2.5 million.
Banc of America Securities LLC and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC acted as joint lead arrangers for our credit facilities. Bank of America, N.A. acted as administrative agent for our credit facilities. Affiliates of Banc of America Securities LLC and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC are lenders under our existing credit facilities and accordingly will receive part of the proceeds, which we intend to use to repay a portion of our outstanding indebtedness under those credit facilities.
We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of common stock by the selling stockholders.
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover of this prospectus, would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this offering by $ , assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
24
Our board of directors currently does not intend to declare dividends or make any other distributions to our stockholders. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will be dependent on then-existing conditions, including our financial condition and results of operations, contractual restrictions, including restrictive covenants contained in our credit facilities, capital requirements and other factors.
25
The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and capitalization as of June 30, 2007 on an actual basis and on an as adjusted basis giving effect to:
You should read this table in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
As of June 30, 2007 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
As Adjusted |
||||
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 21,460 | ||||
Debt: |
||||||
First lien revolving credit facility | $ | — | ||||
First lien term loan facility | 299,250 | |||||
Second lien term loan facility | 125,000 | |||||
Total debt | 424,250 | |||||
Stockholders' equity: |
||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized, 46,487,549 shares issued and outstanding on an actual basis: shares issued and shares outstanding on an as adjusted basis | 465 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 196,682 | |||||
Other comprehensive income | 2,113 | |||||
Accumulated deficit | (73,804 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders' equity | 125,456 | |||||
Total capitalization | $ | 549,706 | ||||
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover of this prospectus, would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this offering by $ , assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
26
If you invest in our shares of common stock in this offering, your ownership interest in us will be diluted to the extent of the differences between the initial public offering price per share and net tangible book value per share after this offering. Our net tangible book value as of June 30, 2007 is determined by subtracting the total amount of our liabilities as of June 30, 2007 from the total amount of our tangible assets as of June 30, 2007. Our net tangible book value per share as of June 30, 2007 is determined by dividing our net tangible book value as of June 30, 2007 by the number of shares of common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2007. Our net tangible book value as of June 30, 2007 was $ , or $ per share, calculated as described above.
After giving effect to the issuance in this offering of shares of common stock at an assumed initial price to the public of $ per share, which is the mid-point of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and the application of our estimated net proceeds therefrom, and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and our estimated offering expenses, our net tangible book value as of June 30, 2007 would have been an aggregate of $ million, or $ per common share. This amount represents an immediate increase of $ per share to our existing stockholders and an immediate dilution of $ per share from the assumed initial price to the public of $ per share to new investors purchasing shares in this offering. The table below illustrates this per share dilution:
Assumed initial price to the public per share | $ | ||||||
Net tangible book value per share as of June 30, 2007 | $ | ||||||
Increase in net tangible book value per share attributable to this offering | $ | ||||||
Net tangible book value per share after this offering | $ | ||||||
Dilution per share to new investors | $ | ||||||
A $1.00 increase (or decrease) in the assumed initial offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase (or decrease) the net tangible book value as of June 30, 2007 by $ million, or $ per share of common stock and the dilution per share to new investors by $ assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the assumed underwriting discounts and commissions.
The table below sets forth, as of June 30, 2007, the number of our shares of common stock issued, the total consideration paid and the average price per share paid by our existing stockholders and our new investors, after giving effect to the issuance of shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial price to the public of $ per share, which is the mid-point of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus:
|
Shares Issued |
Total Consideration |
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Average Price Per Share |
||||||||||||
|
Number |
Percent(1) |
Amount |
Percent |
|||||||||
Existing stockholders | % | $ | % | ||||||||||
New investors | |||||||||||||
Total | 100 | % | $ | 100 | % |
27
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
On January 11, 2007, we acquired ISS for a purchase price of approximately $542.6 million. The following unaudited pro forma statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 gives pro forma effect to the acquisition of ISS as if it had occurred on January 1, 2006. The pro forma as adjusted statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 give further effect to the sale by us of shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial offering price of $ per share and the application of the net proceeds thereof as if this offering was completed on January 1, 2006. The pro forma financial statements do not give effect to our acquisition of CFRA on August 1, 2007, since it is not considered a significant subsidiary under applicable SEC regulations.
The unaudited pro forma financial statements are based on estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions are preliminary and have been made solely for purposes of developing this pro forma information. Unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have been achieved if the acquisition of ISS had been consummated as of the date indicated, nor is it necessarily indicative of the results of future operations. The pro forma financial information does not give effect to any cost savings or restructuring and integration costs that may result from the integration of ISS' business.
In connection with the purchase of ISS, we incurred indebtedness of $425.0 million. The first lien term loan is for an aggregate principal amount of $300.0 million and currently bears an annual interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.25%. The second lien term loan is for an aggregate principal amount of $125.0 million and currently bears an annual interest rate of LIBOR plus 5.50%. As required by the credit facilities, we entered into interest-rate swap agreements to reduce our interest rate risk and to manage our interest expense. By entering into these agreements, we changed the fixed/variable interest-rate mix of our debt portfolio. At the date of the acquisition of ISS, ISS' existing indebtedness of approximately $44.9 million was paid in full.
The ISS purchase price has been allocated based on preliminary estimates of the fair market value of the acquired assets and liabilities. See Note 1 to the Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Statements of Operations. The pro forma adjustments are subject to change pending a final analysis of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The impact of these changes could be material.
28
RISKMETRICS GROUP, INC.
PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
|
RiskMetrics Group, Inc. (Historical) |
Institutional Shareholder Services Holdings, Inc. (Historical) |
Pro Forma Adjustments For ISS Acquisition (1)(3(a)) |
|
Pro Forma |
Adjustments for the Offering(4) |
Pro Forma, as Adjusted |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenues | $ | 101,236 | $ | 103,269 | $ | $ | 204,505 | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues | 25,618 | 39,933 | 65,551 | ||||||||||||||||||
Research and development expenses | 21,202 | 6,070 | 27,272 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses | 14,977 | 15,728 | 30,705 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 12,852 | 16,678 | 29,530 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 4,081 | 3,578 | (1,545 | ) | 3(b) | 6,114 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 770 | 2,520 | 15,811 | 3(c) | 19,101 | ||||||||||||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment | 15 | — | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 79,515 | 84,507 | 178,288 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income from operations | 21,721 | 18,762 | 26,217 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income and expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest, dividend and investment income | 2,549 | 419 | 2,968 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (49 | ) | (4,042 | ) | (31,902 | ) | 3(d) | (37,189 | ) | ||||||||||||
(1,196 | ) | 3(e) | |||||||||||||||||||
Total other income and expenses, net | 2,500 | (3,623 | ) | (34,221 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 24,221 | 15,139 | (8,004 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 8,200 | 6,236 | (17,638 | ) | 3(f) | (3,202 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 16,021 | $ | 8,903 | $ | (4,802 | ) | $ | |||||||||||||
Basic and diluted net loss per share |
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
$ |
|||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted | 45,429,420 | ||||||||||||||||||||
See notes to unaudited pro forma statements of operations.
29
PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
|
RiskMetrics Group, Inc. January 1 to June 30, 2007 (Historical) |
Institutional Shareholder Services Holdings, Inc. January 1 to January 11, 2007 (Historical) |
Pro Forma Adjustments for ISS Acquisition(1)(3(a)) |
Pro Forma |
Adjustments for the Offering(4) |
Pro Forma, as Adjusted |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenues | $ | 110,515 | $ | 3,327 | $ | $ | 113,842 | $ | $ | |||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues | 34,682 | 2,350 | 37,032 | |||||||||||||||||
Research and development expenses | 15,045 | 597 | 15,642 | |||||||||||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses | 16,412 | 823 | 17,235 | |||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 14,031 | 12,030 | 26,061 | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 3,323 | 132 | 70 | 3(b) | 3,525 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 8,624 | 84 | 457 | 3(c) | 9,165 | |||||||||||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 92,119 | 16,016 | (2) | 108,662 | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | 18,396 | (12,689 | ) | 5,180 | ||||||||||||||||
Other income and expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest, dividend and investment income | 1,154 | 20 | 1,174 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (17,993 | ) | (1,274) | (2) | (965) | 3(d) | ||||||||||||||
(36) | 3(e) | (20,268 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total other income and expenses, net | (16,839 | ) | (1,254 | ) | (19,094 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 1,557 | (13,943 | ) | (13,914 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 812 | (5,743 | ) | (635) | 3(f) | (5,566 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 745 | $ | (8,200 | ) | $ | (8,348 | ) | $ | |||||||||||
Basic and diluted net loss per share | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted | 45,463,149 | |||||||||||||||||||
See notes to unaudited pro forma statements of operations.
30
PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
|
RiskMetrics Group, Inc. (Historical) |
Institutional Shareholder Services Holdings, Inc. (Historical) |
Pro Forma Adjustments for ISS Acquisition(1)(3(a)) |
Pro Forma |
Adjustments for the Offering(4) |
Pro Forma, As Adjusted |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenues | $ | 50,919 | $ | 50,420 | $ | $ | 101,339 | $ | $ | |||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues | 12,381 | 21,498 | 33,879 | |||||||||||||||||
Research and development expenses | 10,903 | 3,147 | 14,050 | |||||||||||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses | 7,333 | 6,936 | 14,269 | |||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 5,818 | 8,402 | 14,220 | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 2,025 | 1,053 | (36 | ) 3(b) | 3,042 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 770 | 1,138 | 8,027 | 3(c) | 9,935 | |||||||||||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment | 11 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 39,241 | 42,174 | 89,406 | |||||||||||||||||
Income from operations | 11,678 | 8,246 | 11,933 | |||||||||||||||||
Other income and expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest, dividend and investment income | 993 | 184 | 1,177 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (27 | ) | (1,906 | ) | (15,704 | ) 3(d) | ||||||||||||||
(598 | ) 3(e) | (18,235 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total other income and expenses, net | 966 | (1,722 | ) | (17,058 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 12,644 | 6,524 | (5,125 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 4,281 | 2,687 | (9,018 | ) 3(f) | (2,050 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 8,363 | $ | 3,837 | $ | (3,075 | ) | $ | $ | |||||||||||
Basic and diluted net loss per share |
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted | 45,542,159 | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
See notes to unaudited pro forma statements of operations.
31
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006,
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2007
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND
PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
1. ALLOCATION OF PURCHASE PRICE
The allocation of the purchase price paid in connection with our acquisition of ISS among the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is based on preliminary estimates of the fair market value. These estimates of fair market value could change based on the completion of our evaluation of the assets and liabilities of ISS, including finalization of an independent appraisal of the assets acquired.
The following table sets forth the components of the purchase price:
Cash | $ | 482,718 | |
Fair market value of common stock issued (2,774,351 shares) | 42,426 | ||
Fair market value of stock options exchanged (1,396,000 shares underlying the options) | 16,331 | ||
Transaction costs | 1,163 | ||
Total purchase price | $ | 542,638 | |
The conversion of stock options held by ISS employees into options to acquire 1,396,000 shares of our common stock and the issuance of 2,774,351 shares of our common stock in exchange for ISS stock held by ISS employees and stockholders were based on the estimated fair market value of our common stock on the date of the acquisition.
The fair market value of converted stock options issued in connection with the merger was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model utilizing the following weighted-average assumptions:
Risk-free interest rate | 4.7% | |
Expected option term | 3 years | |
Expected stock price volatility | 31.0% | |
Expected dividend yield | None |
The derived fair market value of our common stock was determined based on an agreed upon exchange ratio which was implicitly equivalent to $15.29 per share (See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Significant Factors, Assumptions and Methodologies Used in Determining the Fair Value of our Capital Stock"). Subsequently, we hired an independent valuation firm which deemed the above fair market value reasonable. The determination of fair market value of our common stock requires us to make judgments that are complex and inherently subjective.
32
The following table provides the preliminary allocation of the purchase price based upon ISS' unaudited balance sheet as of January 11, 2007, the date of the acquisition:
Assets | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents and other current assets | $ | 47,405 | |||
Non-current assets | 13,300 | ||||
Property and equipment | 4,864 | ||||
Intangible assets | 172,600 | ||||
Goodwill | 423,597 | ||||
Total assets acquired | 661,766 | ||||
Liabilities |
|||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | (21,378 | ) | |||
Deferred revenue | (43,510 | ) | |||
Other non-current liabilities | (1,533 | ) | |||
Deferred tax liability | (52,707 | ) | |||
Net assets acquired | $ | 542,638 | |||
In accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, we have provided for deferred taxes for the difference between the book and tax basis of the net assets acquired which results in an increase in goodwill.
2. ISS TRANSACTION EXPENSES
Total operating costs and expenses for ISS for the period of January 1, 2007 through January 11, 2007 includes $13.4 million of non-recurring expenses associated with the ISS acquisition, which constitute non-recurring items as defined in our credit facilities. These costs were incurred by ISS prior to the acquisition and include the following:
|
Total Non- Recurring Expenses |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Operating costs and expenses: | ||||
Costs of revenues | $ | 867 | ||
Research and development expenses | 226 | |||
Selling and marketing expenses | 281 | |||
General and administrative expenses | 11,980 | |||
Total Non-recurring expenses | $ | 13,354 |
Non-recurring expenses consists of: a transaction fee of $6.7 million, non-cash stock based compensation of $3.0 million, cash compensation and other charges of $5.4 million, partially offset by a deferred rent credit of $1.7 million.
Interest expense for ISS for the period of January 1, 2007 through January 11, 2007 includes a $1.2 million non-recurring charge associated with the ISS acquisition, which constitutes a non-recurring
33
item as defined in our credit facilities. This cost represents the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs related to the pre-existing outstanding indebtedness of ISS.
3. PRO FORMA ISS ACQUISITION ADJUSTMENTS
Shares issued and options exchanged (see Note 1) | $ | 58,757 | |||
Cash | 482,718 | ||||
Transaction costs | 1,163 | ||||
Total purchase price | $ | 542,638 | |||
Excess of purchase price is allocated as follows: | |||||
Goodwill | $ | 423,597 | |||
Intangible assets | 172,600 | ||||
Deferred tax liability | (52,707 | ) | |||
Net liabilities assumed | (852 | ) | |||
Total purchase consideration | $ | 542,638 | |||
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Preliminary estimated remaining useful life |
|
||||||||||||
|
Preliminary purchase allocation |
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
|||||||||||||
|
2006 |
2007 |
|||||||||||||
Furniture and fixtures | $ | 1,073 | 3 years | $ | 358 | $ | 179 | $ | 179 | ||||||
Computer equipment | 2,739 | 2 years | 1,370 | 685 | 685 | ||||||||||
Leasehold improvements | 1,052 | 2-5 years | 305 | 153 | 153 | ||||||||||
$ | 4,864 | 2,033 | 1,017 | 1,017 | |||||||||||
Historical expense | (3,578 | ) | (1,053 | ) | (947 | ) | |||||||||
(Reduced) incremental pro forma expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 | $ | (1,545 | ) | $ | (36 | ) | $ | 70 | |||||||
34
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Preliminary estimated remaining useful life |
|
|||||||||||||
|
Preliminary purchase allocation |
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
||||||||||||||
|
2006 |
2007 |
||||||||||||||
Customer relationships | $ | 117,900 | 9-11 years | $ | 11,001 | $ | 5,500 | $ | 5,500 | |||||||
Acquired technology | 25,300 | 5 years | 5,060 | 2,530 | 2,530 | |||||||||||
Trade names | ||||||||||||||||
Definite-lives | 22,700 | 10 years | 2,270 | 1,135 | 1,135 | |||||||||||
Indefinite-lives | 6,700 | N/A | — | — | — | |||||||||||
$ | 172,600 | 18,331 | 9,165 | 9,165 | ||||||||||||
Historical expense | (2,520 | ) | (1,138 | ) | (8,708 | ) | ||||||||||
Incremental pro forma expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 | $ | 15,811 | $ | 8,027 | $ | 457 | ||||||||||
At this time, management is unable to determine whether the amounts allocated to the above intangible assets will change when it finalizes its valuation and if changes are made, the amount of such changes. A $1,000 fluctuation in the fair value amounts allocated to the identifiable definite lived intangible assets would cause the following increases or decreases in annual amortization expense:
|
Dollar Change |
||
---|---|---|---|
Customer relationships | $ | 93 | |
Acquired technology | $ | 200 | |
Trade names | $ | 100 |
35
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
||||||||||
|
|
2006 |
2007 |
|||||||||
(i) | $300 million first lien term loan, interest rate at 2.25% plus floating LIBOR rate | $ | 22,340 | $ | 10,769 | $ | 11,525 | |||||
(ii) |
$125 million second lien term loan, interest rate at 5.50% plus floating LIBOR rate |
13,371 |
6,502 |
6,819 |
||||||||
(iii) |
0.5% bank fee for unused portion of $25 million first lien revolving line of credit, interest at 2.25% plus floating LIBOR rate. No amounts outstanding as of June 30, 2007 |
125 |
62 |
62 |
||||||||
Total interest expense | 35,836 | 17,333 | 18,406 | |||||||||
Impact of interest rate swap agreement on interest expense |
(311 | ) | 174 | (395 | ) | |||||||
Adjusted interest expense | 35,525 | 17,507 | 18,011 | |||||||||
Historical expense | (3,623 | ) | (1,803 | ) | (17,046 | ) | ||||||
Incremental pro forma expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 |
$ | 31,902 | $ | 15,704 | $ | 965 | ||||||
As required by our credit facilities, we entered into interest-rate swap agreements to reduce our interest rate risk on a substantial majority of our indebtedness and to manage our interest expense. These agreements effectively limit the exposure on the variable rates reflected above by converting the LIBOR component of our annual interest rates with respect to 75% of our outstanding first lien term loan facility and second lien term loan facility to a fixed rate of 5.099% per annum.
36
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
|||||||||
|
2006 |
2007 |
||||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
$ |
1,439 |
$ |
720 |
$ |
720 |
||||
Historical expense |
(243 |
) |
(122 |
) |
(684 |
) |
||||
Incremental pro forma expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 |
$ |
1,196 |
$ |
598 |
$ |
36 |
||||
4. OFFERING ADJUSTMENTS
Shares issued at $.01 par value | $ | ||
Additional paid-in capital |
37
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Our selected consolidated financial information presented as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 and for each of the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 was derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. Our selected consolidated financial information presented as of December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 was derived from our audited consolidated financial statements, which are not included in this prospectus. Our selected unaudited consolidated historical financial information presented as of June 30, 2007 and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 was derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements have been prepared on a basis consistent with the audited financial statements and include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals, considered necessary for fair presentation. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2007. The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data
|
Year ended December 31, |
Six months ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2006 |
2007(8) |
||||||||||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands, except share data) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(1) | $ | 29,579 | $ | 50,446 | $ | 71,699 | $ | 93,637 | $ | 101,236 | $ | 50,919 | $ | 110,515 | |||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs of revenues | 7,019 | 12,359 | 18,909 | 23,704 | 25,618 | 12,381 | 34,682 | ||||||||||||||||
Research and development expenses | 7,477 | 10,158 | 14,095 | 16,099 | 21,202 | 10,903 | 15,045 | ||||||||||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses | 10,020 | 10,827 | 13,222 | 12,257 | 14,977 | 7,333 | 16,412 | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 6,959 | 9,716 | 9,328 | 11,492 | 12,852 | 5,818 | 14,031 | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment(2) | 1,191 | 2,627 | 5,170 | 3,551 | 4,081 | 2,025 | 3,323 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets(3) | — | 659 | 1,079 | 2,713 | 770 | 770 | 8,624 | ||||||||||||||||
Impairment of goodwill | — | — | — | 361 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment(2)(4) | — | 119 | 1,659 | 1,577 | 15 | 11 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses(5)(6) | 32,666 | 46,465 | 63,462 | 71,754 | 79,515 | 39,241 | 92,119 | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | (3,087 | ) | 3,981 | 8,237 | 21,883 | 21,721 | 11,678 | 18,396 | |||||||||||||||
Interest, dividend and investment income (expense), net: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest, dividend and investment income | 593 | 432 | 597 | 1,438 | 2,549 | 992 | 1,154 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | — | — | — | — | (49 | ) | (26 | ) | (17,993 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest, dividend and investment income (expense), net | 593 | 432 | 597 | 1,438 | 2,500 | 966 | (16,839 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes | (2,494 | ) | 4,413 | 8,834 | 23,321 | 24,221 | 12,644 | 1,557 | |||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(7) | 94 | 252 | (1,048 | ) | 7,640 | 8,200 | 4,281 | 812 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (2,588 | ) | $ | 4,161 | $ | 9,882 | $ | 15,681 | $ | 16,021 | $ | 8,363 | $ | 745 | ||||||||
38
Net income (loss) per share: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.02 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.01 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | 17,535 | 17,020 | 30,380 | 43,496 | 42,655 | 42,768 | 45,310 | ||||||||||||||||
Diluted | 17,535 | 18,070 | 49,814 | 48,413 | 47,964 | 47,930 | 53,589 |
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
|
As of December 31, |
|
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
As of June 30, 2007(8) |
|||||||||||||||||
|
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
|||||||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 22,804 | $ | 7,634 | $ | 12,042 | $ | 10,966 | $ | 37,313 | $ | 21,460 | ||||||
Short-term investments | 2,763 | 24,095 | 46,453 | 69,296 | 68,071 | 21,125 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill and intangibles, net | — | 4,722 | 3,844 | 770 | — | 584,512 | ||||||||||||
Total assets | 39,444 | 59,699 | 89,833 | 115,293 | 136,947 | 725,171 | ||||||||||||
Deferred revenue | 17,782 | 31,322 | 45,996 | 53,744 | 58,842 | 101,408 | ||||||||||||
Total debt, including current portion | — | — | — | — | — | 424,250 | ||||||||||||
Stockholders' equity | 14,229 | 18,514 | 30,074 | 44,270 | 56,498 | 125,456 |
Notes to Selected Consolidated Financial Information:
39
40
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF ISS
The selected consolidated historical financial information for ISS presented as of and for each of the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 was derived from ISS' audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected consolidated historical unaudited financial information for ISS presented for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was derived from ISS' unaudited consolidated interim financial statements which are not included in this prospectus. In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements have been prepared on a basis consistent with the audited financial statements and include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals, considered necessary for fair presentation.
The selected consolidated historical financial information set forth below should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of ISS and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" which are included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2006 |
|||||||||||||
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
|||||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 66,554 | $ | 82,972 | $ | 103,269 | $ | 50,420 | ||||||
Operating costs and expenses: | ||||||||||||||
Costs of revenues | 27,924 | 30,741 | 39,933 | 21,498 | ||||||||||
Research and development expenses | 5,234 | 5,416 | 6,070 | 3,147 | ||||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses | 10,954 | 14,537 | 15,728 | 6,936 | ||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 12,697 | 13,758 | 16,678 | 8,402 | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 1,395 | 2,057 | 3,578 | 1,053 | ||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 2,854 | 1,863 | 2,520 | 1,138 | ||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses(1) | 61,058 | 68,372 | 84,507 | 42,174 | ||||||||||
Income from operations | 5,496 | 14,600 | 18,762 | 8,246 | ||||||||||
Interest, dividend and investment income (expense), net: | ||||||||||||||
Interest, dividend and investment income | — | — | 419 | 184 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | (529 | ) | (1,426 | ) | (4,042 | ) | (1,906 | ) | ||||||
Interest, dividend and investment income, net | (529 | ) | (1,426 | ) | (3,623 | ) | (1,722 | ) | ||||||
Income before income taxes and minority interest | 4,967 | 13,174 | 15,139 | 6,524 | ||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(2) | (2,136 | ) | 5,248 | 6,236 | 2,687 | |||||||||
Income before minority interest | 7,103 | 7,926 | 8,903 | 3,837 | ||||||||||
Minority interest(3) |
(254 |
) |
(495 |
) |
— |
— |
||||||||
Net income | $ | 6,849 | $ | 7,431 | $ | 8,903 | $ | 3,837 | ||||||
41
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
|
As of December 31, |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
|||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 13,610 | $ | 13,984 | $ | 15,538 | ||||
Goodwill and intangibles, net | 22,169 | 38,083 | 40,099 | |||||||
Total assets | 61,748 | 87,836 | 101,827 | |||||||
Deferred revenue | 27,881 | 35,567 | 44,881 | |||||||
Total debt, including current portion |
7,854 |
51,949 |
44,927 |
|||||||
Stockholders' deficit | (14,224 | ) | (45,620 | ) | (35,504 | ) |
Notes to Selected Consolidated Financial Information of ISS:
42
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our historical financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Actual results and timing of events may differ significantly from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including those set forth in the section entitled "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this prospectus. The historical financial data do not give effect to the completion of this offering.
Overview
We are a leading provider of risk management and corporate governance products and services to participants in the global financial markets. Our solutions enable investors to measure and manage the market, credit, portfolio, governance, accounting, legal and environmental risks associated with their financial holdings. We provide our solutions across multiple asset classes, markets and geographies to a broad group of market participants, including asset managers, hedge funds, pension funds, banks, insurance companies, financial advisors and corporations. Clients rely on us to better understand and manage risk of their financial holdings, to provide greater transparency to both their internal and external constituencies, to satisfy regulatory and reporting requirements and to make better investment decisions.
As of June 30, 2007, we had approximately 3,300 clients located in 50 countries. Among our clients are 74 of the 100 largest investment managers, 31 of the 50 largest mutual fund companies, 34 of the 50 largest hedge funds, in each case as measured by assets under management, each of the 10 largest global investment banks, measured by revenues, and 17 of the 30 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, or OECD, central banks.
The RiskMetrics methodology was developed within JPMorgan in 1992 and was published publicly in 1994. In 1998, RiskMetrics was spun off and became an independent company providing risk management products and services. On January 11, 2007, we acquired ISS through a series of merger transactions. On August 1, 2007, we completed our acquisition of CFRA.
Our growth strategy is focused on the following:
We benefit from a number of favorable attributes of our business model. These attributes include:
43
In evaluating our results, we focus on several key financial and operating data including annualized contract value, renewal rates, sales to new customers, non-recurring revenues and Adjusted EBITDA. Our annualized contract value, which is described in detail below, is a leading indicator of our business and represents a large portion of our revenue in any given period. We track our performance across geographies and product and service lines.
We expect to invest in our business to continue to grow our revenues. Compensation, data acquisition and technology infrastructure costs represent significant components of our operating expense structure. While we expect to increase our operating expenses over time to take advantage of market opportunities, we believe that the economies of scale in our operating model will allow us to grow our operating expenses at a lower rate than revenues and thereby increase our operating margins.
Our Revenues
We generate a substantial majority of our revenues from annual subscriptions to our products and services, for which our clients generally pay us in advance. These contracts generally renew automatically on an annual basis. Our products and services are generally priced based on the number of users who have access to them, as well as the volume of data, research, voting or reports purchased. We do not price our products and services based on our clients' assets under management. As a result, we are not subject to revenue fluctuations resulting from changes in our clients' AUM. Our experience has been that, over time, our clients have often added users and purchased additional products and services from us, which has led to increases in our revenues per client.
Revenues from subscription contracts are referred to as recurring revenues. Recurring revenues are generated through the renewal of existing contracts and the signing of new subscription contracts. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, approximately 91% of our total revenues were generated from these subscription contracts. The subscription fees received from our clients are recorded as deferred revenues and recognized each month as our services are rendered. Our renewal rate, which was 89% for the six months ended June 30, 2007, combined with our level of new subscription contracts, determine our annualized contract value, which is a leading indicator of our recurring revenues. Our annualized contract value as of June 30, 2007 was $209.2 million.
We also generate non-recurring revenue from sales of products and services without a subscription contract. In the six months ended June 30, 2007, non-recurring revenue represented approximately 9% of total revenues.
Annualized Contract Value
As a result of our subscription-based model and high renewal rates, at the end of any period, we generally have subscription contracts in place for a high percentage of our total revenues for the next 12 months. We monitor the contracted revenues from these agreements and refer to them as annualized contract value. We define our annualized contract value as the aggregate value on an annualized basis of all recurring subscription contracts in effect on a reporting date. Any revenues associated with subscription contracts that are entered into during a reporting period will be reflected in the annualized contract value beginning at the end of that period. As a result, annualized contract value at the end of any period is the annualized contract value at the beginning of the period plus the
44
annualized contract revenue associated with new subscription contracts signed during that period minus the annualized contract revenues associated with subscription contracts not renewed. Annualized contract value does not include any fees associated with any non-recurring revenues.
Annualized contract value is an important metric for our business. However, annualized contract value may differ from our future reported revenues due to a number of factors, which include:
Our annualized contract value for the RiskMetrics business and ISS business as of December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and as of June 30, 2007, as well as the percentage growth period over period is set forth, separately for each business, in the table below. The annualized contract value for the RiskMetrics business for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 includes the JPMorgan online services agreement that was terminated as of April 2006. The annualized contract value associated with this agreement was $11.8 million. The growth of ISS' annualized contract value in 2005 was positively affected by the three acquisitions completed by ISS in 2005.
|
As of December 31, |
As of June 30, |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
|||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands, except for percentages) |
||||||||||||
RiskMetrics business annualized contract value | $ | 76,884 | $ | 94,115 | $ | 98,916 | $ | 111,680 | |||||
Percent growth | — | 22.4 | % | 5.1 | % | 29.6 | % | ||||||
ISS business annualized contract value |
$ |
60,172 |
$ |
79,383 |
$ |
91,490 |
$ |
97,551 |
|||||
Percent growth | — | 31.9 | % | 15.3 | % | 12.3 | % |
Renewal Rate
Because non-renewals of subscription contracts decrease our annualized contract value, which in turn decreases our revenues, a key operating metric is renewal rate. Our renewal rate for any period is defined as the amount of annualized contract value that renews in a period divided by the amount of annualized contract value with an expiration date during that period. If a client has a higher contract value upon renewal of its existing contract, the amount in excess of the prior period's contract is considered new contract revenue for purposes of this calculation.
The renewal rate for our RiskMetrics business and ISS business as of December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and as of June 30, 2007, is set forth separately for each business, in the table below. We have calculated the renewal rate for our RiskMetrics business for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 including the JPMorgan online services agreement that was terminated as of April 2006. The RiskMetrics renewal rate for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005 and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was in the 88-90% range. The lower 76% renewal rate for the fiscal year ended
45
December 31, 2006 was due largely to the termination of the JPMorgan online contract which accounted for 12% or half of the 24% non-renewal rate for that period.
|
Year ended December 31, |
Six months ended June 30, |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
|||||
RiskMetrics business renewal rate | 90 | % | 88 | % | 76 | % | 88 | % | |
ISS business renewal rate | 89 | % | 92 | % | 91 | % | 90 | % |
Non-Recurring Revenues
Non-recurring revenues result from sales on a non-subscription basis. Non-recurring revenues for the RiskMetrics business and ISS business for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and the six months ended June 30, 2007 are set forth in the table below. Our non-subscription services include implementation, compensation advisory services and similar services and overages related to ISS' proxy business. Revenues from implementation are recognized as the related subscription service is provided, some compensation advisory services revenues are recognized over a three month period and other non-recurring revenues are recognized once the service is provided. Although we classify overages related to proxy voting contracts as one-time, overages typically result in larger proxy voting contract renewals.
|
Year ended December 31, |
Six months ended June 30, |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
|||||
RiskMetrics business percent non-recurring revenue | 5.7 | % | 5.8 | % | 3.4 | % | 2.8 | % | |
ISS business percent non-recurring revenue | 17.8 | % | 15.6 | % | 14.5 | % | 14.6 | % |
Our Operating Costs and Expenses
Compensation expense represents a substantial majority of our expenses across all of our operating functions. Compensation expenses before stock-based compensation expense are comprised of base salary, bonuses, benefits, payroll taxes and sales commissions. While we expect to grow our headcount over time to take advantage of our market opportunity, we believe that the economies of scale in our operating model will allow us to grow our compensation expenses at a lower rate than revenues.
Other meaningful operating expenses are data, proxy voting fees, occupancy and telecommunications and web hosting costs. Since we deliver our products and services using a common data and technology infrastructure, we expect these expenses to generally increase at less than the rate of revenue growth. Overall, our goal is to keep the rate of growth of these operating expenses below the rate of growth of our revenues. However, in order to take advantage of growth opportunities, we may invest in our business in order to support increased revenue growth. This might result in variability in our operating margin in the short term.
We allocate compensation expenses, including stock-based compensation expense, to our cost of revenues, sales and marketing, research and development and general and administrative expense categories based on the actual costs associated with each employee. Other costs associated with the employees, such as occupancy, travel and telecommunications, are included in the same cost categories as the corresponding employees. The following summarizes certain of our significant operating expenses:
Costs of Revenues
Costs of revenues include costs related to production of proxy research and voting, web hosting, data, account management, implementation and systems operations. Costs in this area consist primarily
46
of staff compensation and related costs and payments to third party vendors, including third party web hosting and data providers.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses include costs related to application, technology infrastructure and analytics development. Costs in this area consist primarily of staff compensation costs and related expenses and consultant expenses.
Selling and Marketing
Selling and marketing expenses consist of costs related to our sales force and marketing professionals. These costs include staff compensation costs and related expenses, including commissions, and general marketing costs.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses consist of expenses for finance, accounting, human resources and information technology personnel. Costs in this area primarily consist of staff compensation and related expenses, legal costs, insurance costs, accounting fees and other professional services fees.
Depreciation and Amortization of Property and Equipment
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment includes depreciation of software, computer and related equipment, furniture and fixtures and telecommunications equipment, which is recorded over the respective useful lives of the related assets. Depreciation also includes the amortization of leasehold improvements which are amortized over the shorter of the term of the lease or the assets' useful life, and the amortization of capitalized software costs. While both leasehold improvements and capitalized software costs are amortized, they are included in the depreciation line item in order to segregate amortization of intangibles which have been acquired from business acquisitions.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization expense includes the amortization of definite life intangible assets such as technology, contracts, customer relationships, trade names, license agreements and non-compete agreements acquired from business acquisitions, which are amortized over their estimated useful lives.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Our critical accounting policies, including the assumptions and judgments underlying them, require the application of significant judgment in the preparation of our financial statements, and as a result they are subject to a greater degree of uncertainty. In applying these policies, we use our judgment to determine the appropriate assumptions to be used in calculating estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates. Our critical accounting policies include the following:
Revenue Recognition
The majority of our revenues are generated from contracted annual subscriptions, for which we receive fees from clients who utilize our products and services. We recognize the revenues on a straight
47
line basis over the term of the subscription which is typically one to three years. We recognize revenue from subscriptions in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin or SAB, No. 104, Revenue Recognition, since we provide our products as a service. Ongoing customer support and the right to unspecified upgrades are included as part of the subscription and are not separate components in the contract. We also recognize revenue on software sales in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position, or SOP, No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended by SOP No. 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions.
We recognize revenue when all of the following conditions are met:
In situations where contracts include client acceptance provisions, we do not recognize revenue until such time as the client has confirmed its acceptance.
We also recognize revenue from non-subscription services including implementation, compensation advisory and proxy business overages. Revenues from implementation are recognized on a deferred basis as the related subscription service is provided, some compensation advisory service revenues are recognized over a three-month period and other non-recurring revenues are recognized once the service is provided.
Goodwill and Intangibles
Goodwill, which consists of the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets of businesses acquired, is evaluated for impairment using a two-step process that is performed at least annually on October 1 of each year, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. The first step is a comparison of the fair value of an internal reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered impaired and the second step is unnecessary. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a second test is performed to measure the amount of impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the goodwill to a determination of the implied value of the goodwill. If the carrying amount of the goodwill is greater that the implied value, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference.
The implied value of goodwill is determined as of the test date by performing a purchase price allocation, as if the reporting unit had just been acquired, using currently estimated fair values of the individual assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, together with an estimate of the fair value of the reporting unit taken as a whole. The estimate of the fair value of the reporting unit is based upon information available regarding prices of similar groups of assets, or other valuation techniques including present value techniques based upon estimates of future cash flow.
Intangible assets, including technology, contracts, customer relationships, certain trade names, license agreements and non-compete agreements arising principally from acquisitions, are recorded at cost less accumulated amortization and our definite-lived intangibles are amortized using a method which reflects the pattern in which the economic benefit of the related intangible asset is utilized. Intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful lives, such as certain trade names, are not amortized and are subject to annual impairment tests or whenever events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. An impairment exists if the carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value. For other intangible assets subject to amortization, impairment is recognized if
48
the carrying amount is not recoverable and the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the intangible asset.
As of June 30, 2007, we had goodwill and intangible assets of $584.5 million. There are many assumptions and estimates used that directly impact the results of impairment testing, including an estimate of future expected revenues, earnings and cash flows, and discount rates applied to such expected cash flows in order to estimate fair value. We have the ability to influence the outcome and ultimate results based on the assumptions and estimates we choose for testing. To mitigate undue influence, we set criteria that are reviewed and approved by various levels of management. The determination of whether or not goodwill or indefinite-lived acquired intangible assets have become impaired involves a significant level of judgment in the assumptions underlying the approach used to determine the value of our reporting unit. Changes in our strategy or market conditions could significantly impact these judgments and require adjustments to recorded amounts of intangible assets.
Stock-Based Compensation
We adopted SFAS 123(R), as of January 1, 2006. SFAS 123(R) replaced the existing requirements under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation to Employees, or APB 25. According to SFAS 123(R), all forms of share-based payments to employees, including employee stock options and employee stock purchase plans, are treated the same as any other form of compensation by recognizing the related cost in the statement of income.
Under SFAS 123(R), stock-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award, and the expense is recognized ratably over the award's vesting period. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), we recognized compensation for unvested awards under the graded vesting method, and will continue to do so in all grants made prior to January 1, 2006. For all grants made subsequent to December 31, 2005, we recognize compensation cost under the straight-line method.
We measure the fair value of stock options on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model which requires the use of several estimates, including:
Prior to the completion of this offering, we were not a publicly traded company, and as a result we had limited historical information on the price of our stock as well as employees' stock option exercise behavior. As a result, we could not rely on historical experience alone to develop assumptions for stock price volatility and the expected life of options. As such, our stock price volatility was estimated with reference to a peer group of companies. Subsequent to the completion of this offering, we will utilize the closing prices of our publicly-traded stock to determine our volatility.
The expected life of options is based on internal studies of historical experience and projected exercise behavior. We estimate expected forfeitures of stock-based awards at the grant date and recognize compensation cost only for those awards expected to vest. The forfeiture assumption is ultimately adjusted to the actual forfeiture rate. Therefore, changes in the forfeiture assumptions may impact the total amount of expense ultimately recognized over the vesting period but do impact the timing of expense recognized over the vesting period. Estimated forfeitures are reassessed in subsequent periods and may change based on new facts and circumstances. We utilize a risk-free
49
interest rate, which is based on the yield of U.S. zero coupon securities with a maturity equal to the expected life of the options. We have not and do not expect to pay dividends on our common shares.
We recorded stock-based compensation expense of $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The use of different assumptions in the Black-Scholes model would result in different amounts of stock-based compensation expense. Furthermore, if different assumptions are used in future periods, stock-based compensation expense could be materially impacted in the future.
Significant Factors, Assumptions and Methodologies Used in Determining the Fair Value of our Capital Stock
Prior to 2007, members of our management possessing the requisite valuation experience estimated the fair value of our capital stock, with assistance from our board of directors. We did not obtain contemporaneous valuations prepared by an unrelated valuation specialist at the time of each stock option issuance because we believed our management possessed the requisite valuation expertise to prepare a reasonable estimate of the fair value of the interests at the time of each issuance since inception. Subsequent to determining the fair value of our common stock, we considered the guidance prescribed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants in its practice aid, "Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation," or the Practice Aid. We believe the methodology we applied was in compliance with the Practice Aid.
According to paragraph 11 of the Practice Aid, quoted market prices in active markets are the best evidence of fair value of a security and should be used as the basis for the measurement of fair value, if available. Since quoted market prices for our securities are not available, the estimate of fair value should be based on the best information available at the time of the valuation, including prices for similar securities and the results of using other valuation techniques. Privately held enterprises or shareholders sometimes engage in arm's-length cash transactions with unrelated parties for the issuance or sale of their equity securities, and the cash exchanged in such a transaction is, under certain conditions, an observable price that serves the same purpose as a quoted market price. Those conditions are (a) the equity securities in the transaction are the same securities as those with which the fair value determination is being made, and (b) the transaction is a current transaction between willing parties. To the extent that arm's-length cash transactions had occurred, we utilized those transactions to determine the fair value of our common stock. When arm's-length transactions as described above were not available, then we utilized other valuation techniques that are reflected within the Practice Aid. The methodologies and assumptions were applied consistently over the various grant dates. The determination of the fair value of our common stock requires us to make judgments that are complex and inherently subjective.
The derived fair value of our common stock underlying the options was determined at regular intervals based on an internal valuation prepared by management with the appropriate level of competency. The fair market value was used as the exercise price for new equity options issued subsequent to that valuation. Each fair market value was approved by our board of directors.
In determining the value of our common stock underlying the stock options, we considered the guidance within the Practice Aid and determined that we had applied generally accepted valuation methodologies, including the guideline company method, a variation of the market approach based on comparable company multiples. The guideline company method incorporates certain assumptions including the market performance of comparable listed companies as well as the financial results and growth trends of the company, to derive the total equity value of the company. The comparable companies were comprised of a combination of companies in the financial services information and technology businesses.
50
We believe using companies in this line of business provides a reasonable basis for estimating the fair value of our common stock because they are most comparable to our operations. We believe that using the guideline company method provides the nearest relative value that can be found in the market and is therefore the best indicator of our value. In determining the valuation of our common stock, we primarily used EBITDA which is a commonly used valuation metric for companies in our industry. We define EBITDA as net income (loss) before interest expense, interest income, income tax expense (benefit), depreciation and amortization of property and equipment and amortization of intangible assets.
Prior to the agreement to acquire ISS in November 2006, we employed the guideline company approach and utilized a multiple of EBITDA to determine the strike prices of our option grants. The multiple applied was based on a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the facts and circumstances at the time of the grants. Our value was established using a multiple of EBITDA of similar companies within a group of our publicly traded peers. The factors we considered when estimating our enterprise value included (i) general private company discounts, (ii) the impact of the greater risk and uncertainty inherent in our size and current stage and (iii) our relative growth rate and profitability relative to the comparables.
The other factors we examined when estimating the multiple of EBITDA to apply, were: (i) the time we believed it would take for us to issue stock in a public offering; (ii) the volatility of our stock; (iii) the risk of completing an initial public offering; and (iv) our smaller size relative to market comparables. Estimating the volatility of the share price of a privately held company is complex because there is no readily available market for the shares. We considered these and determined a multiple of EBITDA that would be appropriate based on the evidence available.
From December 31, 2005 until the execution of the agreement to acquire ISS on November 1, 2006, we do not believe that the fair market value of RiskMetrics changed given its financial performance relative to fiscal 2005.
On November 1, 2006, we agreed to acquire ISS for cash, stock and roll over of ISS options. As part of the transaction, ISS stock options held by ISS employees were converted into options to acquire our common stock and ISS shares held by ISS employees and other stockholders were converted into shares of our common stock. The exchange ratio used to convert these shares and options was a result of an arms length negotiation of the valuation of ISS and RiskMetrics. For purposes of calculating the exchange ratio, the valuation of our company was $15.29 per share of common stock. Our board of directors determined that the strike price for options issued subsequent to the agreement to acquire ISS should be at this per share value. In making this determination, our management and board of directors considered:
Subsequently, we received a report from an independent valuation firm which supported the per share value. The valuation analysis was performed as of December 31, 2006. All options issued subsequent to the agreement to acquire ISS and before June 30, 2007 were issued with a strike price of $15.29, using the approach described above. On June 29, 2007, we agreed to acquire CFRA for cash and stock. The exchange ratio used to convert the stock was the result of an arms length negotiation of the valuation of CFRA and our company. For purposes of calculating the exchange ratio, the valuation of our company was $16.50 per share of common stock. On July 26, 2007, we performed an internal valuation of our capital stock taking into account the progress of our company and the CFRA
51
acquisition, and established the fair market value per share of $16.50, using the approach described above. All employee stock grants made subsequent to such date were issued at such per share price.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes using the liability method in accordance with SFAS No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets or liabilities for the tax-effected temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of our assets and liabilities and for net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. The tax expense or benefit for unusual items, prior year tax exposure items or certain adjustments to valuation allowances are treated as discrete items in the interim period in which the events occur.
On January 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, or FIN 48. FIN 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under FIN 48, we may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we recognized an approximate $0.4 million increase in the current tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits and a decrease to the January 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings. As of the date of adoption and after the impact of recognizing the increase in liability noted above, our unrecognized tax benefits totaled $0.8 million of which $0.4 million would favorably impact our effective tax rate, if recognized. The remaining $0.4 million of liability for unrecognized tax benefits represents deferred tax liabilities established by ISS effective January 1, 2007. Since the liability was recognized prior to the date of acquisition, if the liability is reversed in the future it will be reflected as a reduction of goodwill.
In accordance with FIN 18, Accounting for Income Taxes in Interim Periods, we have developed an estimated annual effective tax rate which includes estimates and judgments about our future taxable income that are based on assumptions that are consistent with our plans and estimates. Our effective tax rate could be adversely impacted by changes in the mix of earnings and losses in countries with differing tax rates, certain non-deductible expenses arising from SFAS 123(R), uncertain tax positions and the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities. Should the actual amounts differ from our estimates, our effective tax rate could be materially impacted.
Results of Operations
Segments and Periods Presented
Prior to January 1, 2007, we operated as a single reportable segment. As a result of our acquisition of ISS and based on a review of SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, we have determined that we now operate in two segments, "the RiskMetrics business" and the "ISS business."
We have provided a discussion of our results of operations on a consolidated basis and have also provided certain detailed discussions for each of our segments. We have done so because the results of ISS are not included in our results of operations until January 12, 2007, but constitute a substantial portion of our business. As a result, in order to provide a meaningful discussion of our ongoing business, we have provided a discussion of the following:
Consolidated Results of Operations
52
ISS on January 11, 2007, our ISS business) compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006 (including the results of operations for only our RiskMetrics business);
Segment Results of Operations
Factors Affecting the Comparability of Results
As discussed above, our acquisition of ISS impacts the comparability of our results of operations. We have not included financial results for CFRA, which we acquired on August 1, 2007.
In March 2003, we acquired JPMorgan Advisory, Inc., an entity which primarily provided wealth management products and services to JPMorgan. In connection with the acquisition, we entered into a three year online services agreement under which we agreed to provide to JPMorgan a customer-specific set of products and services related to the acquired wealth management products and services which were unrelated to our WealthBench product. In 2005, we were notified by JPMorgan that our contract would not be renewed upon the termination of the three year agreement on March 31, 2006. The contract was subsequently extended through April 30, 2006. The results of operations of RiskMetrics reflect the revenues from the JPMorgan online services agreement through April 30, 2006.
Between May 2005 and August 2005, ISS completed the acquisitions of Deminor, Proxy Australia and IRRC, companies engaged in proxy services in Belgium, Australia and the United States, respectively. The results of operations of ISS during 2005 reflect the addition of the results of operations of these companies from the date of their respective acquisitions.
53
Risk Metrics Group, Inc.
Six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006
|
Six months ended June 30, |
Increase (decrease) six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to 2006 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2006 |
2007 |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages) |
||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 50,919 | $ | 110,515 | $ | 59,596 | 117.0 | % | |||||
Operating costs and expenses: | |||||||||||||
Cost of revenues(1) | 12,381 | 34,682 | 22,301 | 180.1 | % | ||||||||
Research and development expenses(1) | 10,903 | 15,045 | 4,142 | 38.0 | % | ||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses(1) | 7,333 | 16,412 | 9,079 | 123.8 | % | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses(1) | 5,818 | 14,031 | 8,213 | 141.2 | % | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 2,025 | 3,323 | 1,298 | 64.1 | % | ||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 770 | 8,624 | 7,854 | 1,020.0 | % | ||||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment | 11 | 2 | (9 | ) | (81.8) | % | |||||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 39,241 | 92,119 | 52,878 | 134.8 | % | ||||||||
Income from operations | 11,678 | 18,396 | 6,718 | 57.5 | % | ||||||||
Interest, dividend and investment income (expense), net | 966 | (16,839 | ) | (17,805 | ) | (1,843.2) | % | ||||||
Income before provision for income taxes | 12,644 | 1,557 | (11,087 | ) | (87.7) | % | |||||||
Provision for income taxes | 4,281 | 812 | (3,469 | ) | (81.0) | % | |||||||
Net income | $ | 8,363 | $ | 745 | $ | (7,618 | ) | (91.1 | )% | ||||
|
Six months ended June 30, |
Increase (decrease) six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to 2006 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2006 |
2007 |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages) |
||||||||||||
Cost of revenues | $ | 464 | $ | 575 | $ | 111 | 23.9 | % | |||||
Research and development expenses | 481 | 660 | 179 | 37.2 | % | ||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses | 259 | 553 | 294 | 113.5 | % | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 721 | 753 | 32 | 4.4 | % | ||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | 1,925 | $ | 2,541 | $ | 616 | 32.0 | % | |||||
The following table provides information with respect to our revenues in certain geographic regions:
|
Six months ended June 30, 2006 |
Six months ended June 30, 2007 |
Increase (decrease) six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to 2006 |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Region |
Revenue |
% of Total Revenue |
Revenue |
% of Total Revenue |
Amount |
% |
||||||||||
|
(Amounts in millions, except percentages) |
|||||||||||||||
Americas | $ | 28.5 | 56.0 | % | $ | 69.1 | 62.5 | % | $ | 40.6 | 142.5 | % | ||||
Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) | 18.0 | 35.4 | % | 34.2 | 31.0 | % | 16.2 | 90.0 | % | |||||||
Asia | 4.4 | 8.6 | % | 7.2 | 6.5 | % | 2.8 | 63.6 | % | |||||||
Total | $ | 50.9 | 100.0 | % | $ | 110.5 | 100.0 | % | $ | 59.6 | 117.0 | % | ||||
54
Set forth below is a discussion of the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007 for RiskMetrics Group, Inc. This discussion focuses primarily on the impact of our acquisition of ISS on January 11, 2007 and its effects on our results of operations. For a more detailed discussion of the results of operations of each of our RiskMetrics and ISS businesses, please see the separate discussions of the results of operations for RiskMetrics and ISS for these periods set forth below.
Revenues. Revenues increased from $50.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $110.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, or 117.0%. The increase consisted of revenues of $53.8 million attributable to ISS and included as a result of our acquisition of ISS on January 11, 2007 and revenue of $5.8 million relating to RiskMetrics.
Operating costs and expenses. Total operating expenses increased from $39.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $92.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, or 134.8%. The increase consisted of operating expenses of $48.7 million attributable to ISS and included as a result of our acquisition of ISS and an increase of $4.2 million relating to RiskMetrics, most of which was the result of a $2.4 million increase in cost of revenues.
Cost of revenues. Cost of revenues increased from $12.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $34.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, or 180.1%. The increase was primarily due to cost of revenues of $19.8 million attributable to ISS and included as a result of our acquisition of ISS and an increase of $2.5 million relating to RiskMetrics. The increase in cost of revenues for RiskMetrics resulted from an increase in client support, data and web hosting costs. As a percentage of revenues, cost of revenues increased from 24.3% to 31.4%. This increase in cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues reflects the acquisition of ISS, which has historically operated with cost of revenues as a higher percentage of revenues than RiskMetrics, as well as the increased costs at RiskMetrics as discussed above. We believe that going forward, our cost of revenue as a percentage of revenues will decrease due to the increased scalability of operations across our combined company resulting from our internal resources and third party vendor relationships.
Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses increased from $10.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $15.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, or 38.0%. The increase was primarily due to research and development expenses of $3.3 million attributable to ISS and included as a result of our acquisition of ISS, and an increase of $0.8 million relating to RiskMetrics. As a percentage of revenues, research and development expenses decreased from 21.4% to 13.6%. The decrease in research and development expenses as a percentage of revenues reflects the acquisition of ISS, which has historically operated with research and development expenses as a lower percentage of revenues than RiskMetrics.
Selling and marketing expenses. Selling and marketing expenses increased from $7.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $16.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, or 123.8%. The increase was primarily due to selling and marketing expenses of $8.3 million attributable to ISS and included as a result of our acquisition of ISS, and an increase of $0.8 million relating to RiskMetrics. As a percentage of revenues, selling and marketing expenses increased from 14.4% to 14.9%. Selling and marketing expenses as a percentage of revenues have historically been approximately the same for both RiskMetrics and ISS.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased from $5.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $14.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, or 141.2%. The increase was primarily due to general and administrative expenses of $7.5 million included as a result of our acquisition of ISS, and an increase of $0.7 million relating to RiskMetrics. As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses increased from 11.4% to 12.7%. The increase in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues reflected the acquisition of
55
ISS, which has historically operated with general and administrative expenses as a higher percentage of revenues than RiskMetrics as well as higher costs as a result of merger integration efforts.
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment increased from $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $3.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, or 64.1%. The increase was primarily due to depreciation of $1.2 million resulting from the acquisition of ISS and an increase of $0.1 million relating to RiskMetrics.
Amortization of intangible assets. Amortization of intangible assets increased from $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $8.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase was due to amortization of $8.6 million as a result of our acquisition of ISS.
Interest, dividend and investment income (expense), net. Net interest, dividend and investment income was $1.0 million of income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and $16.8 million of expense for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The change was due to interest expense incurred on the $425 million of debt incurred as a result of the ISS acquisition. We expect that interest expense will increase as a result of approximately $15.0 million of additional indebtedness under our first lien revolving credit facility incurred in connection with our acquisition of CFRA on August 1, 2007.
Provision for income taxes. Income taxes decreased from a provision of $4.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to a provision of $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, or 81.0%. The decrease was the result of a decline in pre-tax income in the six months ended June 30, 2007, as a result of the large amount of interest expense and amortization resulting from the acquisition of ISS.
The provision for income taxes represents an effective tax rate of 52.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to an effective rate of 33.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The effective rate changed from 2006 to 2007 mainly due to an increase in non-deductible stock-based compensation expense attributable to incentive stock options. Effective tax rates are subject to change based on the taxable income in all the jurisdictions in which we do business.
Net income. Net income decreased from $8.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, or 91.1%. The decrease was primarily due to additional amortization and interest expense related to the acquisition of ISS.
56
Segment results of operations
RiskMetrics Business
Six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006
|
Six months ended June 30, |
Increase (decrease) six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to 2006 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2006 |
2007 |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages) |
||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 50,919 | $ | 56,736 | $ | 5,817 | 11.4 | % | |||||
Operating costs and expenses: | |||||||||||||
Cost of revenues(1) | 12,381 | 14,879 | 2,498 | 20.2 | % | ||||||||
Research and development expenses(1) | 10,903 | 11,744 | 841 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses(1) | 7,333 | 8,103 | 770 | 10.5 | % | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses(1) | 5,818 | 6,542 | 724 | 12.4 | % | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 2,025 | 2,170 | 145 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 770 | — | (770 | ) | (100.0) | % | |||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment | 11 | 2 | (9 | ) | (81.8) | % | |||||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 39,241 | 43,440 | 4,199 | 10.7 | % | ||||||||
Income from operations | $ | 11,678 | $ | 13,296 | $ | 1,618 | 13.9 | % | |||||
|
Six months ended June 30, |
Increase (decrease) six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to 2006 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2006 |
2007 |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages) |
||||||||||||
Cost of revenues | $ | 464 | $ | 359 | $ | (105 | ) | (22.6) | % | ||||
Research and development expenses | 481 | 547 | 66 | 13.7 | % | ||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses | 259 | 248 | (11 | ) | (4.2) | % | |||||||
General and administrative expenses | 721 | 464 | (257 | ) | (35.6) | % | |||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | 1,925 | $ | 1,618 | $ | (307 | ) | (15.9) | % | ||||
The following table provides information with respect to our RiskMetrics business revenues in certain geographic regions:
|
Six months ended June 30, 2006 |
Six months ended June 30, 2007 |
Increase (decrease) six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to 2006 |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Region |
Revenue |
% of Total Revenue |
Revenue |
% of Total Revenue |
Amount |
% |
||||||||||
|
(Amounts in millions, except percentages) |
|||||||||||||||
Americas | $ | 28.5 | 56.0 | % | $ | 26.3 | 46.4 | % | $ | (2.2 | ) | (7.7) | % | |||
Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) | 18.0 | 35.4 | % | 25.7 | 45.3 | % | 7.7 | 42.8 | % | |||||||
Asia | 4.4 | 8.6 | % | 4.7 | 8.3 | % | 0.3 | 6.8 | % | |||||||
Total | $ | 50.9 | 100.0 | % | $ | 56.7 | 100.0 | % | $ | 5.8 | 11.4 | % | ||||
57
Revenues. Revenues increased from $50.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $56.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, or 11.4%. The $5.8 million increase in revenues was primarily due to a $9.3 million, or 23.9%, increase in revenues from our Market Risk products, offset by a $4.3 million reduction in revenues due to the loss of the JPMorgan online services agreement. The increase in revenues from our Market Risk products was due to strong sales of RiskManager to asset managers and hedge funds as they increased their outsourcing of risk reporting services. Increased revenues resulted from both increased sales to existing customers and sales to new customers. As a percentage of total revenues, revenues from our Market Risk products increased from 76.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to 85.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Revenue growth was also driven by our sales in the EMEA region as revenues increased 42.8% over the comparable period last year, driven by strong sales of RiskManager in this region due to, among other things, the need for financial services firms to comply with new regulatory requirements.
Operating costs and expenses. Operating expenses increased from $39.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $43.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, or 10.7%. The increase was mainly due to increased compensation costs related to higher headcount, bonus accrual and commissions of $4.3 million and higher data and web hosting costs, totaling $0.8 million. As a percentage of revenues, operating expenses decreased slightly from 77.1% to 76.6% due to increased economies of scale in delivering client solutions and the elimination of amortization expense resulting from the termination of the JPMorgan online contract.
Cost of revenues. Cost of revenues increased from $12.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $14.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, or 20.2%. The increase was primarily due to $1.0 million of increased compensation costs in our London office to support our revenue growth in Europe, a $0.4 million increase in third party data costs due to the increased breadth of asset classes covered by us, and an increase in web hosting costs associated with the opening of an additional data center in Geneva, Switzerland in April 2006. As a percentage of revenues, cost of revenues increased from 24.3% to 26.2%.
Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses increased from $10.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $11.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, or 7.7%. The increase was primarily due to increased employee compensation costs due to increased headcount in our New York office and increased employee compensation costs due to increased headcount in our Geneva, Switzerland office. As a percentage of revenues, research and development expenses decreased from 21.4% to 20.7%.
Selling and marketing expenses. Selling and marketing expenses increased from $7.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $8.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, or 10.5%. The increase was primarily due to increased sales commissions of $0.7 million based on a higher volume of new sales in the six months ended June 30, 2007. As a percentage of revenues, selling and marketing expenses decreased slightly from 14.4% to 14.3%.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased from $5.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $6.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, or 12.4%. The increase was primarily due to increased employee compensation costs, stock-based compensation expense and merger integration costs. As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses increased slightly from 11.4% to 11.5%.
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment increased from $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, or 7.2%.
58
Amortization of intangible assets. Amortization of intangible assets decreased from $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to zero for the six months ended June 30, 2007. During 2005, we were notified that our contract with JPMorgan for online services would not be renewed. As such, we accelerated the amortization of the intangible assets related to the agreement over their remaining useful lives. This acceleration resulted in $0.8 million of amortization expense in the six months ended June 30, 2006.
ISS Business
The period January 12, 2007 to June 30, 2007 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) for the period January 12, 2007 to June 30, 2007 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006 |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2006 |
January 12, 2007 to June 30, 2007 |
|||||||||||
|
Amount |
% |
|||||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages) |
||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 50,420 | $ | 53,779 | $ | 3,359 | 6.7 | % | |||||
Operating costs and expenses: | |||||||||||||
Cost of revenues(1) | 21,498 | 19,804 | (1,694 | ) | (7.9) | % | |||||||
Research and development expenses(1) | 3,147 | 3,301 | 154 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses(1) | 6,936 | 8,309 | 1,373 | 19.8 | % | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses(1) | 8,402 | 7,489 | (913 | ) | (10.9) | % | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 1,053 | 1,152 | 99 | 9.4 | % | ||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 1,138 | 8,624 | 7,486 | 657.8 | % | ||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 42,174 | 48,679 | 6,505 | 15.4 | % | ||||||||
Income from operations | $ | 8,246 | $ | 5,100 | $ | (3,146 | ) | (38.2) | % | ||||
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) for the period January 12, 2007 to June 30, 2007 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006 |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2006 |
January 12, 2007 to June 30, 2007 |
|||||||||||
|
Amount |
% |
|||||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages) |
||||||||||||
Cost of revenues | $ | 317 | $ | 215 | $ | (102 | ) | (32.2) | % | ||||
Research and development expenses | 38 | 114 | 76 | 200.0 | % | ||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses | 45 | 304 | 259 | 575.6 | % | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 507 | 290 | (217 | ) | (42.8) | % | |||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | 907 | $ | 923 | $ | 16 | 1.8 | % | |||||
59
The following table provides information with respect to our ISS business revenues in certain geographic regions:
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) for the period January 12, 2007 to June 30, 2007 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2006 |
January 12, 2007 to June 30, 2007 |
||||||||||||||
Region |
|
% of Total Revenue |
|
% of Total Revenue |
||||||||||||
Revenue |
Revenue |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||||||
|
(Amounts in millions, except percentages) |
|||||||||||||||
Americas | $ | 41.2 | 81.7 | % | $ | 42.6 | 79.3 | % | $ | 1.4 | 3.4 | % | ||||
Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) | 7.4 | 14.7 | % | 8.7 | 16.1 | % | 1.3 | 17.6 | % | |||||||
Asia | 1.8 | 3.6 | % | 2.5 | 4.6 | % | 0.7 | 38.9 | % | |||||||
Total | $ | 50.4 | 100.0 | % | $ | 53.8 | 100.0 | % | $ | 3.4 | 6.7 | % | ||||
Revenues. Revenues increased from $50.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $53.8 million for the period from January 12, 2007 to June 30, 2007, or 6.7%.
During the period from January 1 to January 11, 2007, ISS recognized revenues of $3.3 million. Had this revenue been included in the six months ended June 30, 2007, revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2007 would have been $57.1 million, an increase of 13.3% as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006. All the information provided in the remainder of this paragraph reflects the inclusion of the revenues for this 11-day period. The increase in revenues was primarily due to an increase in revenues from our proxy services products from $37.8 million to $43.0 million, or 13.8%. Revenue from our proxy services products accounted for 75.3% of total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Our revenue from our financial research and analysis products increased from $12.6 million to $14.1 million, or 11.9%, due to the growth of our revenues from our compensation advisory services and M&A Edge products. Revenues from the Americas accounted for 79.3% of ISS revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2007, down from 81.7% in the six months ended June 30, 2006, as ISS continued to diversify geographically.
Operating costs and expenses. Total operating expenses increased from $42.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $48.7 million for the period from January 12, 2007 to June 30, 2007, or 15.4%. The increase in operating expenses was primarily due to a $7.5 million increase in amortization of intangible assets that resulted from the acquisition of ISS by RiskMetrics, and a $1.4 million increase in selling and marketing expenses, offset by a $1.7 million decrease in cost of revenues. As a percentage of revenues, operating expenses increased from 83.6% to 90.5%.
Cost of revenues. Cost of revenues decreased from $21.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $19.8 million for the period from January 12, 2007 to June 30, 2007, or 7.9%. The decrease was primarily due to the elimination of a special bonus paid to option holders in the prior period in connection with a cash dividend paid by ISS to its stockholders, as well as fewer days in the period ended June 30, 2007. As a percentage of revenues, cost of revenues decreased from 42.6% to 36.8%.
Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses increased by $0.2 million from $3.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $3.3 million for the period from January 12, 2007 to June 30, 2007, or 4.9%. The increase was due to increased salaries and stock-based compensation expense, partially offset by the shortened period of comparison and reduced use of external consultants for application development. As a percentage of revenues, research and development expenses decreased from 6.2% to 6.1%.
60
Selling and marketing expenses. Selling and marketing expenses increased from $6.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $8.3 million for the period from January 12, 2007 to June 30, 2007, or 19.8%. The increase was primarily due to increases in commissions associated with the higher base of recurring revenues, increased salaries and increased stock-based compensation and travel expense associated with an expansion of our sales force, partially offset by a reduction in marketing expenses and a decrease in expenses resulting from the shortened period of comparison. As a percentage of revenues, selling and marketing expenses increased from 13.8% to 15.5%.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses decreased from $8.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $7.5 million for period from January 12, 2007 to June 30, 2007, or 10.9%. The decrease was primarily due to the elimination of the special bonus paid to option holders in the prior period in connection with a cash dividend paid by ISS to its stockholders, lower legal expenses and reduced stock-based compensation expense. As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses decreased from 16.7% to 13.9%.
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment increased from $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $1.2 million for the period from January 12, 2007 to June 30, 2007, or 9.4%.
Amortization of intangible assets. Amortization of intangible assets increased from $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $8.6 million for the period from January 12, 2007 to June 30, 2007, or 657.8%. The increase was due to $8.6 million of amortization of intangible assets related to the acquisition of ISS.
RiskMetrics Business
Year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the year ended December 31, 2005
|
Year ended December 31, |
Increase (decrease) for year ended December 31, 2006 compared to 2005 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2006 |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages) |
||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 93,637 | $ | 101,236 | $ | 7,599 | 8.1 | % | |||||
Operating costs and expenses: | |||||||||||||
Cost of revenues(1) | 23,704 | 25,618 | 1,914 | 8.1 | % | ||||||||
Research and development expenses(1) | 16,099 | 21,202 | 5,103 | 31.7 | % | ||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses(1) | 12,257 | 14,977 | 2,720 | 22.2 | % | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses(1) | 11,492 | 12,852 | 1,360 | 11.8 | % | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 3,551 | 4,081 | 530 | 14.9 | % | ||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 2,713 | 770 | (1,943 | ) | (71.6 | )% | |||||||
Impairment of goodwill | 361 | — | (361 | ) | (100.0 | )% | |||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment | 1,577 | 15 | (1,562 | ) | (99.0 | )% | |||||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 71,754 | 79,515 | 7,761 | 10.8 | % | ||||||||
Income from operations | 21,883 | 21,721 | (162 | ) | (0.7 | )% | |||||||
Interest, dividend and investment income |
1,438 |
2,549 |
1,111 |
77.3 |
% |
||||||||
Interest expense | — | (49 | ) | (49 | ) | — | |||||||
Interest, dividend and investment income, net | 1,438 | 2,500 | 1,062 | 73.9 | % | ||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes | 23,321 | 24,221 | 900 | 3.9 | % | ||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 7,640 | 8,200 | 560 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 15,681 | $ | 16,021 | $ | 340 | 2.2 | % | |||||
61
|
Year ended December 31, |
Increase (decrease) for year ended December 31, 2006 compared to 2005 |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2006 |
Amount |
% |
||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages) |
|||||||||||
Cost of revenues | $ | — | $ | 876 | $ | 876 | — | |||||
Research and development expenses | — | 909 | 909 | — | ||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses | — | 490 | 490 | — | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses | — | 1,361 | 1,361 | — | ||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | — | $ | 3,636 | $ | 3,636 | — | |||||
The following table provides information with respect to our RiskMetrics business revenues in certain geographic regions:
|
Year ended December 31, 2005 |
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
Increase (decrease) for year ended December 31, 2006 compared to 2005 |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Region |
|
% of Total Revenue |
|
% of Total Revenue |
||||||||||||
Revenue |
Revenue |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||||||
|
(Amounts in millions, except percentages) |
|||||||||||||||
Americas | $ | 55.6 | 59.4 | % | $ | 52.7 | 52.1 | % | $ | (2.9 | ) | (5.2 | )% | |||
Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) | 30.0 | 32.1 | % | 39.5 | 39.0 | % | 9.5 | 31.7 | % | |||||||
Asia | 8.0 | 8.5 | % | 9.0 | 8.9 | % | 1.0 | 12.5 | % | |||||||
Total | $ | 93.6 | 100.0 | % | $ | 101.2 | 100.0 | % | $ | 7.6 | 8.1 | % | ||||
Revenues. Revenues increased from $93.6 million in 2005 to $101.2 million in 2006, or 8.1%. The $7.6 million increase in revenues was primarily due to a $16.7 million, or 25.9%, increase in revenues from our Market Risk products, offset by an $8.4 million reduction in revenues due to the loss of the JPMorgan online services agreement. The increase in revenues from our Market Risk products was due to strong sales of our RiskManager web-based application and managed services offerings to asset managers and hedge funds as they increased their outsourcing of risk reporting services. Increased revenues resulted from both increased sales to existing customers and sales to new customers. As a percentage of revenues, revenues from our Market Risk products increased from 68.8% in 2005 to 80.1% in 2006.
Revenues from the EMEA region increased by 31.7% in 2006 compared to 2005, driven by strong sales of our RiskManager products in this region, primarily due to the need for financial services firms to comply with new regulatory requirements.
Operating costs and expenses. Total operating expenses increased from $71.8 million in 2005 to $79.5 million in 2006, or 10.8%. Stock-based compensation expense, which increased by $3.6 million, accounted for 46.8% of the increase in operating expenses due to our adoption of SFAS 123(R) on January 1, 2006. The remaining $4.1 million increase in operating expenses was primarily due to increased compensation expenses resulting from higher headcount and commissions, and higher data, web hosting and technology costs. The increases in operating expenses were partially offset by lower amortization expenses and professional services costs, and a loss on disposal of property. Most of the cost increases were in research and development and sales and marketing expenses. As a percentage of revenues, operating expenses increased from 76.6% to 78.5%.
Cost of revenues. Cost of revenues increased from $23.7 million in 2005 to $25.6 million in 2006, or 8.1%. The increase was primarily due to increased data costs of $1.1 million, stock-based compensation expense of $0.9 million and approximately $0.3 million of international web hosting fees,
62
offset by a decrease in allocated occupancy and telecommunication costs of approximately of $0.4 million. As a percentage of revenues, cost of revenues remained relatively constant at 25.3%.
Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses increased from $16.1 million in 2005 to $21.2 million in 2006, or 31.7%. The increase was primarily due to an increase in compensation expense of approximately $4.7 million, resulting from the hiring of new employees to support RiskMetrics' product development and investment in our RiskManager market risk system as well as increased stock-based compensation expense of $0.9 million. As a percentage of revenues, research and development expenses increased from 17.2% to 20.9%.
Selling and marketing expenses. Selling and marketing expenses increased from $12.3 million in 2005 to $15.0 million in 2006, or 22.2%. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in headcount as a result of the expansion of our sales force, increased sales commissions of $0.9 million resulting from our increased sales and $0.5 million of stock-based compensation expense. As a percentage of revenues, selling and marketing expenses increased from 13.1% to 14.8%.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased from $11.5 million in 2005 to $12.9 million in 2006, or 11.8%. The increase was primarily due to stock-based compensation expense of $1.4 million. As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses increased slightly from 12.3% to 12.7%.
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment increased from $3.6 million in 2005 to $4.1 million in 2006, or 14.9%. The increase was due to increased depreciation related to capital expenditures for our technology and data infrastructure to support the growth of our business.
Amortization of intangible assets. Amortization of intangible assets expense decreased to $0.8 million in 2006 from $2.7 million in 2005, or 71.6%. During 2005, we were notified that our contract with JPMorgan for online services would not be renewed on its termination date of March 31, 2006. The contract was subsequently extended through April 2006. As such, we accelerated the amortization of the related intangible assets over their remaining useful life through April 2006. This acceleration resulted in an additional $1.8 million of amortization during 2005.
Impairment of goodwill. Impairment of goodwill was $0.4 million in 2005. We did not realize an impairment of goodwill in 2006. The amount in 2005 was due to the write-off of the remaining goodwill of $0.4 million associated the JPMorgan online services agreement.
Loss on disposal of property and equipment. Loss on disposal of property and equipment was $1.6 million in 2005 and was nominal in 2006. During 2005, leases for two of our offices were terminated and we relocated and entered into new leases. With respect to these relocations, the remaining value of leasehold improvements associated with the terminated offices was written off. In addition, we disposed of certain furniture and hardware that had become obsolete during 2005.
Interest, dividend and investment income, net. Interest, dividend and investment income, net increased from $1.4 million in 2005 to $2.5 million in 2006, or 73.9%. The increase was primarily due to increased interest rates and higher cash balances during 2006.
Provision (benefit) for income tax. Provision for income taxes increased from $7.6 million in 2005 to $8.2 million in 2006, or 7.3%. Our effective tax rate increased from 32.8% in 2005 to 33.9% in 2006 due to the utilization of our remaining net operating loss carry forwards in 2005. Our effective rate is lower than our statutory rate primarily due to tax exempt interest and dividends earned on investments, and state and local income tax credits.
Net income. Net income increased from $15.7 million in 2005 to $16.0 million in 2006, or 2.2%.
63
Year ended December 31, 2005 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004
|
Year ended December 31, |
Increase (decrease) for year ended December 31, 2005 compared to 2004 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2005 |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages) |
||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 71,699 | $ | 93,637 | $ | 21,938 | 30.6 | % | |||||
Operating costs and expenses: | |||||||||||||
Cost of revenues(1) | 18,909 | 23,704 | 4,795 | 25.4 | % | ||||||||
Research and development expenses(1) | 14,095 | 16,099 | 2,004 | 14.2 | % | ||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses(1) | 13,222 | 12,257 | (965 | ) | (7.3 | )% | |||||||
General and administrative expenses(1) | 9,328 | 11,492 | 2,164 | 23.2 | % | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 5,170 | 3,551 | (1,619 | ) | (31.3 | )% | |||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 1,079 | 2,713 | 1,634 | 151.4 | % | ||||||||
Impairment of goodwill | — | 361 | 361 | — | % | ||||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment | 1,659 | 1,577 | (82 | ) | (4.9 | )% | |||||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 63,462 | 71,754 | 8,292 | 13.1 | % | ||||||||
Income from operations | 8,237 | 21,883 | 13,646 | 165.7 | % | ||||||||
Interest, dividend and investment income, net: |
|||||||||||||
Interest, dividend and investment income | 597 | 1,438 | 841 | 140.9 | % | ||||||||
Interest expense | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Interest, dividend and investment income, net | 597 | 1,438 | 841 | 140.9 | % | ||||||||
Income before provision (benefit) for income taxes | 8,834 | 23,321 | 14,487 | 164.0 | % | ||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | (1,048 | ) | 7,640 | 8,688 | 829.0 | % | |||||||
Net income |
$ |
9,882 |
$ |
15,681 |
$ |
5,799 |
58.7 |
% |
|||||
|
Year ended December 31, |
Increase (decrease) for year ended December 31, 2005 compared to 2004 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2005 |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages) |
||||||||||||
Cost of revenues | $ | 346 | $ | — | $ | (346 | ) | (100 | )% | ||||
Research and development expenses | 993 | — | (993 | ) | (100 | )% | |||||||
Selling and marketing expenses | 190 | — | (190 | ) | (100 | )% | |||||||
General and administrative expenses | 1,053 | — | (1,053 | ) | (100 | )% | |||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | 2,582 | $ | — | $ | (2,582 | ) | (100 | )% | ||||
64
The following table provides information with respect to our RiskMetrics business revenues in certain geographic regions:
|
Year ended December 31, 2004 |
Year ended December 31, 2005 |
Increase (decrease) for year ended December 31, 2005 compared to 2004 |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Region |
|
% of Total Revenue |
|
% of Total Revenue |
||||||||||||
Revenue |
Revenue |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||||||
|
(Amounts in millions, except percentages) |
|||||||||||||||
Americas | $ | 44.5 | 62.1 | % | $ | 55.6 | 59.4 | % | $ | 11.1 | 24.9 | % | ||||
Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) | 19.8 | 27.6 | % | 30.0 | 32.1 | % | 10.3 | 51.5 | % | |||||||
Asia | 7.4 | 10.3 | % | 8.0 | 8.5 | % | 0.6 | 8.1 | % | |||||||
Total | $ | 71.7 | 100.0 | % | $ | 93.6 | 100.0 | % | $ | 22.0 | 30.6 | % | ||||
Revenues. Revenues increased from $71.7 million in 2004 to $93.6 million in 2005, or 30.6%. The $21.9 million increase of revenues was primarily due to a $20.1 million or 45.3% increase in revenues from our Market Risk products and a $1.9 million increase in revenues from our Wealth Management products. The increase in revenues from our Market Risk products was due to strong sales of our RiskManager web-based application and managed services offerings to asset managers and hedge funds as they increased their outsourcing of risk reporting services. Increased revenues resulted from both increased sales to existing customers and sales to new customers. The increase in revenues from our Wealth Management products was due to the adoption of our WealthBench solution by private banks. As a percentage of total revenues, revenues from our Market Risk products increased from 61.9% in 2004 to 68.8% in 2005.
Revenue from our EMEA and Americas regions increased by 51.5% and 24.9%, respectively, over 2005, due in part to strong RiskManager sales.
Operating costs and expenses. Total operating expenses increased from $63.5 million in 2004 to $71.8 million in 2005, or 13.1%. The increase in operating expenses was related to increases in compensation expense due to higher headcount, higher data and occupancy costs and increased amortization, partially offset by lower stock-based compensation expense and lower depreciation and commission expenses. In 2004, we completed a private placement and repurchase, a transaction in which employees were permitted to exercise stock options and sell their underlying shares, which resulted in $2.6 million of stock-based compensation expense. As a percentage of revenues, operating expenses decreased from 88.5% to 76.6%.
Cost of revenues. Cost of revenues increased from $18.9 million in 2004 to $23.7 million in 2005, or 25.4%. The increase was primarily due to $1.6 million of costs to support the expansion of external vendor data to include new classes of derivative and structured products, headcount increases in Singapore to support a 24 hours / 7 days a week global operation and in our London account management team to support increased European business. This was partially offset by stock-based compensation expense in 2004 related to the private placement and repurchase, described above, with no corresponding expense in 2005. As a percentage of revenues, cost of revenues decreased from 26.4% to 25.3%.
Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses increased from $14.1 million in 2004 to $16.1 million in 2005, or 14.2%. The increase was due to increased compensation expense associated with the expansion of our operations in Oklahoma during 2005 to support the development of our technology infrastructure, delivery of new and enhanced product offerings and the opening of a new research and development office in Geneva, Switzerland. These costs were partially offset by the non-recurrence of $1.0 million of stock-based compensation expense in
65
2004 related to the private placement and repurchase described above. As a percentage of revenues, research and development expenses decreased from 19.7% to 17.2%.
Selling and marketing expenses. Selling and marketing expenses decreased from $13.2 million in 2004 to $12.3 million in 2005, or 7.3%. The decrease was primarily due to a decline in sales commissions of $0.8 million related to a change in our commission plan and $0.2 million of stock-based compensation expense recognized during 2004 related to the private placement and repurchase described above. As a percentage of revenues, selling and marketing expenses decreased from 18.4% to 13.1%.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased from $9.3 million in 2004 to $11.5 million in 2005, or 23.2%. The increase was primarily due to higher occupancy costs resulting from a one-time early lease termination fee of $1.2 million relating to our New York office, the opening of a new office in Geneva, Switzerland, larger office spaces in New York and Oklahoma and increased headcount for our in-house legal and management information systems teams. These costs were partially offset by $1.1 million of non-recurring stock-based compensation expense recognized during 2004 related to the private placement and repurchase described above. As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses decreased from 13.0% to 12.3%.
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment decreased from $5.2 million in 2004 to $3.6 million in 2005, or 31.3%. In 2004, we changed the estimated useful life of our computer hardware from five years to three years based on average usage rates, which resulted in additional depreciation expense of $1.2 million in 2004.
Amortization of intangible assets. Amortization of intangible assets expense increased from $1.1 million in 2004 to $2.7 million in 2005, or 151.4%. Upon notice of termination, we accelerated the amortization of the intangible asset relating to the JPMorgan online services agreement to fully amortize related intangible assets over the remaining useful life through April 2006. This acceleration resulted in an additional $1.8 million of amortization expense during 2005.
Loss on disposal of property and equipment. Loss on disposal of property and equipment decreased from $1.7 million in 2004 to $1.6 million in 2005, or 4.9%. During 2005, leases for two of our offices were terminated and we relocated and entered into new leases. As a result of these relocations, the remaining value of the leasehold improvements associated with the terminated offices was written off and we disposed of certain hardware, that had become obsolete and furniture, during 2005. During 2004, a lease for one of our offices expired and we entered into a new lease. As part of this relocation, we disposed of certain furniture and hardware that had become obsolete resulting in a loss on disposal of $1.6 million during 2004.
Interest, dividend and investment income, net. Interest, dividend and investment income increased from $0.6 million in 2004 to $1.4 million in 2005, or 140.9%. The increase was primarily due to increased interest rates and cash and investment balances during 2005.
Provisions (benefit) for income taxes. Income taxes increased from a benefit of $1.0 million in 2004 to a provision of $7.6 million in 2005.
Prior to 2004, we had historical income tax losses and therefore had not recorded any income tax benefit from net operating losses. During 2004, our sustained level of profitability, combined with our expectations of future profitability, generated a tax benefit from the utilization of net operating loss carry forwards. The effective tax rate for 2005 was 32.8% and is less than the statutory rate primarily due to tax exempt interest and dividends earned on investments and state and local income tax credits.
Net income. Net income increased from $9.9 million in 2004 to $15.7 million in 2005, or 58.7%.
66
ISS Business
We have included a separate discussion and analysis of the results of operations of our ISS business for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 because it comprises a substantial portion of our business and is expected to account for a substantial portion of our future results of operations and cash flow.
Year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the year ended December 31, 2005
|
Year ended December 31, |
Increase (decrease) for year ended December 31, 2006 compared to 2005 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2006 |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages) |
||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 82,972 | $ | 103,269 | $ | 20,297 | 24.5 | % | |||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
|||||||||||||
Cost of revenues(1) | 30,741 | 39,933 | 9,192 | 29.9 | % | ||||||||
Research and development expenses(1) | 5,416 | 6,070 | 654 | 12.1 | % | ||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses(1) | 14,537 | 15,728 | 1,191 | 8.2 | % | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses(1) | 13,758 | 16,678 | 2,920 | 21.2 | % | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 2,057 | 3,578 | 1,521 | 73.9 | % | ||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 1,863 | 2,520 | 657 | 35.3 | % | ||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 68,372 | 84,507 | 16,135 | 23.6 | % | ||||||||
Income from operations | $ | 14,600 | $ | 18,762 | $ | 4,162 | 28.5 | % | |||||
|
Year ended December 31, |
Increase (decrease) for year ended December 31, 2006 compared to 2005 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2006 |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages) |
||||||||||||
Cost of revenues | $ | 107 | $ | 635 | $ | 528 | 493.5 | % | |||||
Research and development expenses | 8 | 76 | 68 | 850.0 | % | ||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses | 6 | 89 | 83 | 1,383.3 | % | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 39 | 1,015 | 976 | 2,502.6 | % | ||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | 160 | $ | 1,815 | $ | 1,655 | 1,034.4 | % | |||||
The following table provides information with respect to our ISS business revenues in certain geographic regions:
|
Year ended December 31, 2005 |
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Increase (decrease) for year ended December 31, 2006 compared to 2005 |
|||||||||||||||
Region |
|
% of Total Revenue |
|
% of Total Revenue |
||||||||||||
Revenue |
Revenue |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||||||
|
(Amounts in millions, except percentages) |
|||||||||||||||
Americas | $ | 69.7 | 84.0 | % | $ | 83.0 | 80.3 | % | $ | 13.3 | 19.1 | % | ||||
Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) | 11.1 | 13.4 | % | 16.1 | 15.6 | % | 5.0 | 45.0 | % | |||||||
Asia | 2.2 | 2.6 | % | 4.2 | 4.1 | % | 2.0 | 90.9 | % | |||||||
Total | $ | 83.0 | 100.0 | % | $ | 103.3 | 100.0 | % | $ | 20.3 | 24.5 | % | ||||
67
Revenues. Revenues increased from $83.0 million in 2005 to $103.3 million in 2006, or 24.5%. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in revenue from our Proxy Services products from $65.1 million in 2005 to $79.3 million in 2006, or 21.8%. Increased revenues resulted from both increased sales to existing customers and sales to new customers, as well as the full-year impact of the 2005 acquisitions of Deminor, Proxy Australia and IRRC. As a percentage of total revenue, our revenue from our proxy services products decreased from 78.5% in 2005 to 76.7% in 2006. Our revenue from our Financial Research and Analysis products increased from $17.8 million in 2005 to $24.1 million in 2006, or 35.4%, due to growth in sales of our environmental, social and governance, or ES&G, solutions and the launch of our M&A Edge product. Revenues from the EMEA region grew from $11.1 million 2005 to $16.1 million in 2006 and revenues from Asia grew from $2.2 million in 2005 to $4.2 million in 2006, in both cases primarily as a result of the international acquisitions of Deminor and Proxy Australia. In 2006, 80.3% of ISS' revenues were from its Americas region, compared to 84.0% in 2005.
Operating costs and expenses. Total operating expenses increased from $68.4 million in 2005 to $84.5 million in 2006, or 23.6%. The increase was primarily driven by an $8.1 million increase in compensation expense due to the full year impact of the acquisitions, an increase in headcount and related increases in salary and bonus expenses, a $2.2 million increase in depreciation and amortization, a $1.7 million increase in stock-based compensation expense due to the adoption of SFAS 123(R) and increases in non-compensation costs of revenues and legal fees. As a percentage of revenues, operating expenses decreased from 82.4% to 81.8%.
Cost of revenues. Cost of revenues increased from $30.7 million in 2005 to $39.9 million in 2006, or 29.9%. The increase was primarily due to increased headcount related expenses and rent associated with the full-year impact of the acquisitions of Deminor, Proxy Australia and IRRC, as well as an increase in overall proxy research and account management headcount, an increase in temporary employees related to proxy season, an increase in transaction fees paid to Broadridge to transmit proxy vote instructions on behalf of our clients and a $0.5 million increase in stock-based compensation expense. As a percentage of revenues, cost of revenues increased from 37.0% to 38.7%.
Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses increased from $5.4 million in 2005 to $6.1 million in 2006, or 12.1%. The increase was driven by increased headcount related expenses for the expansion of the company's product and service development and testing capabilities. As a percentage of revenues, research and development expense decreased from 6.5% to 5.9%.
Selling and marketing expenses. Selling and marketing expenses increased from $14.5 million in 2005 to $15.7 million in 2006, or 8.2%. The increase was primarily due to an expansion of our sales force, primarily in international locations, offset by a $0.5 million reduction in marketing expenses. As a percentage of revenues, selling and marketing expenses decreased from 17.5% to 15.2%.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased from $13.8 million in 2005 to $16.7 million in 2006, or 21.2%. The increase was primarily due to increases in salary and bonus compensation expenses, increases in stock-based compensation expense of $1.0 million related to the adoption of SFAS 123(R) and an increase of $0.9 million in legal fees associated with the sale of ISS to RiskMetrics Group, Inc. As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses decreased from 16.6% to 16.2%.
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment increased from $2.1 million in 2005 to $3.6 million in 2006, or 73.9%. The increase was primarily due to increased depreciation of internal use software as a result of increased software capitalization in prior years.
68
Amortization of intangible assets. Amortization of intangible assets expense increased from $1.9 million in 2005 to $2.5 million in 2006, or 35.3%. The increase was primarily due to the amortization of intangible assets from the acquisitions of Deminor, Proxy Australia and IRRC between May and August of 2005, which resulted in $6.2 million of identifiable definite-lived intangible assets.
Year ended December 31, 2005 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004
|
Year ended December 31, |
Increase (decrease) for year ended December 31, 2005 compared to 2004 |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2005 |
Amount |
% |
||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages) |
|||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 66,554 | $ | 82,972 | $ | 16,418 | 24.7 | % | ||||
Operating costs and expenses: | ||||||||||||
Cost of revenues(1) | 27,924 | 30,741 | 2,817 | 10.1 | % | |||||||
Research and development expenses(1) | 5,234 | 5,416 | 182 | 3.5 | % | |||||||
Selling and marketing expenses(1) | 10,954 | 14,537 | 3,583 | 32.7 | % | |||||||
General and administrative expenses(1) | 12,697 | 13,758 | 1,061 | 8.4 | % | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 1,395 | 2,057 | 662 | 47.5 | % | |||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 2,854 | 1,863 | (991 | ) | (34.7 | )% | ||||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 61,058 | 68,372 | 7,314 | 12.0 | % | |||||||
Income from operations | $ | 5,496 | $ | 14,600 | $ | 9,104 | 165.6 | % | ||||
|
Year ended December 31, |
Increase (decrease) for year ended December 31, 2005 compared to 2004 |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2005 |
Amount |
% |
||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages) |
|||||||||||
Cost of revenues | $ | — | $ | 107 | $ | 107 | — | |||||
Research and development expenses | — | 8 | 8 | — | ||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses | — | 6 | 6 | — | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses | — | 39 | 39 | — | ||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | — | $ | 160 | $ | 160 | — | |||||
The following table provides information with respect to our ISS business revenues in certain geographic regions:
|
Year ended December 31, 2004 |
Year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Increase (decrease) for year ended December 31, 2005 compared to 2004 |
|||||||||||||||
Region |
|
% of Total Revenue |
|
% of Total Revenue |
||||||||||||
Revenue |
Revenue |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||||||
|
|
(Amounts in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
||||||||||||
Americas | $ | 57.2 | 85.9 | % | $ | 69.7 | 84.0 | % | $ | 12.5 | 21.9 | % | ||||
Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) | 8.0 | 12.0 | % | 11.1 | 13.4 | % | 3.1 | 38.8 | % | |||||||
Asia | 1.4 | 2.1 | % | 2.2 | 2.6 | % | 0.8 | 57.1 | % | |||||||
Total | $ | 66.6 | 100.0 | % | $ | 83.0 | 100.0 | % | $ | 16.4 | 24.7 | % | ||||
69
Revenues. Revenues increased from $66.6 million in 2004 to $83.0 million in 2005, or 24.7%. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in revenues from our Proxy Services from $50.0 million in 2004 to $65.1 million in 2005, or 30.2%. This increase resulted from sales to new and existing customers of proxy research and voting services, and $5.2 million from the mid-year acquisitions of Deminor, Proxy Australia and IRRC. Revenues from our Financial Research and Analysis products increased from $16.6 million in 2004 to $17.8 million in 2005, or 7.2%, due to increased sales of our ES&G products and Compensation Advisory Services. The percentage of revenues from the Americas decreased from 85.9% in 2004 to 84.0% in 2005, due to the international acquisitions.
Operating costs and expenses. Total operating expenses increased from $61.1 million in 2004 to $68.4 million in 2005, or 12.0%. The increase was due in part to $2.0 million of cash payments made to ISS option holders in 2005, as well as $5.8 million due to the acquisitions of Deminor, Proxy Australia and IRRC. As a percentage of revenues, operating expenses decreased from 91.7% to 82.4% due to the economies of scale associated with the proxy research and voting business.
Cost of revenues. Cost of revenues increased from $27.9 million in 2004 to $30.7 million in 2005, or 10.1%. The increase was primarily due to increased costs associated with the acquisitions of Deminor, Proxy Australia and IRRC, an increase of $0.7 million of compensation expense related to the hiring of temporary employees during the proxy season and $0.8 million related to payments to option holders in 2005. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in transaction fees paid to Broadridge due to a new rate schedule. As a percentage of revenues, cost of revenues decreased from 42.0% to 37.0%.
Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses increased by $0.2 million from $5.2 million in 2004 to $5.4 million in 2005, or 3.5%. The increase was primarily due to a slight increase in headcount. As a percentage of revenues, research and development expenses decreased from 7.9% to 6.5%.
Selling and marketing expenses. Selling and marketing expenses increased from $11.0 million in 2004 to $14.5 million in 2005, or 32.7%. The increase was primarily due to costs associated with the acquisitions of Deminor, Proxy Australia and IRRC, a $1.2 million increase in salaries for an expanded sales force and $1.2 million of increased commission expense associated with an overall increase in sales and renewals. Marketing expenses increased by $0.4 million due primarily to increased costs associated with our 25th anniversary conference. As a percentage of revenues, selling and marketing expenses increased from 16.5% to 17.5%.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased from $12.7 million in 2004 to $13.8 million in 2005, or 8.4%. The increase was primarily due to the $1.0 million of general and administrative expenses related to cash payments in 2005 to option holders, who were mostly general and administrative personnel. As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses decreased from 19.1% to 16.6%.
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment increased from $1.4 million in 2004 to $2.1 million in 2005, or 47.5% due to a $6.6 million increase in the fixed asset base caused by our acquisitions of Deminor, Proxy Australia and IRRC, and due to other capital expenditures.
Amortization of intangible assets. Amortization expense decreased from $2.9 million in 2004 to $1.9 million in 2005, or 34.7%. The decrease was primarily due to the run off of amortization of intangible assets resulting from the acquisition of ISS by its then-current owners. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in amortization of intangible assets associated with the acquisitions of Deminor, Proxy Australia and IRRC, which resulted in $6.2 million of identifiable definite-lived intangible assets.
70
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2007, we had $21.5 million in cash and $21.1 million of investments for a total of $42.6 million of cash and investments. We acquired CFRA on August 1, 2007, which resulted in the utilization of approximately $31.6 million of cash and investments, and borrowings under our revolving credit facility of approximately $15.0 million. We believe our existing cash and cash equivalents, our cash flow from operating activities and availability under our existing credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next 12 months, during which time we expect to make approximately $10.0 million to $11.0 million of capital expenditures. Our future working capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our revenue growth, debt service, possible acquisitions of businesses and investments in our own business. To the extent our liquidity sources are insufficient to fund our future activities, we may need to raise additional funding through a public or private equity or debt offering. No assurances can be given that additional financing will be available in the future or that if available, such financing will be on favorable terms.
Cash Flows
Operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2007 provided cash of $1.1 million reflecting primarily net income of $0.7 million plus depreciation and amortization of $11.9 million, offset by a reduction of $12.6 million in accrued expenses related to the payment of bonuses and commissions related to 2006 performance. Cash provided by operating activities decreased in the first six months of 2007 relative to the same period in 2006 mainly due to the $17.1 million increase in cash interest payments related to the debt acquired and $0.9 million of payroll taxes assumed and paid in connection with the ISS acquisition. Cash flow from operations for the 12 months ended December 31, 2006 was $36.1 million, reflecting primarily net income of $16.0 million plus depreciation and amortization of $4.9 million, stock-based compensation of $3.6 million, a $5.1 million increase in deferred revenue and a $3.9 million decrease in accounts receivable.
Our cash flow tends to be lower in the first half of each year due to bonuses and commissions paid during this period and due to the seasonality of contract renewals and corresponding up-front payments, which are somewhat concentrated in the fourth quarter of each year.
Investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2007 used cash of $435.9 million, primarily due to the acquisition of ISS, which included the liquidation of investments that provided us $46.9 million of cash, as well as capital expenditures of $3.6 million. Cash flows from investing activities for the 12 months ended December 31, 2006 used cash of $2.3 million, primarily due to capital expenditures, partially offset by the sale (net of purchases) of investments. The timing of investment sales or purchases fluctuates based upon the liquidity requirements of our business.
Financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2007 provided cash of $418.8 million as a result of proceeds received from the incurrence of $425.0 million of indebtedness in connection with the ISS acquisition, partially offset by the payment of debt, and debt issuance costs. Cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2006 used $7.5 million due primarily to the repurchase of stock, partially offset by proceeds received from stock option exercises.
Long Term Debt
In connection with the purchase of ISS, we incurred $425.0 million of indebtedness. The indebtedness is comprised of first lien and second lien term loans. We also entered into a first lien revolving credit facility. See "Description of Certain Indebtedness."
As of June 30, 2007 no amounts had been borrowed under the first lien revolving credit facility. On July 31, 2007, we borrowed $15.0 million under the revolving credit facility in connection with the acquisition of CFRA. As a result, there is $10.0 million of remaining availability under the revolving
71
credit facility. Amounts paid under the term loans may not be re-borrowed. The maturity dates of the first lien loan, second lien loan and revolving credit facility loans are January 2013, January 2014 and July 2014, respectively.
In February 2007, we entered into two interest-rate swap agreements to reduce interest rate risks and to manage interest expense. By entering into these agreements, we change the fixed/variable interest-rate mix of our debt portfolio. As of June 30, 2007, the interest rate swaps had notional amounts of $318.2 million and a fair value of $2.5 million. The agreements effectively convert our floating-rate debt into fixed-rate debt. This reduces our risk of incurring higher interest costs in periods of rising interest rates. Our interest-rate swap agreements hedge a significant portion of the interest rate risk exposure under our indebtedness. The interest rate swap agreements reduced our weighted average effective interest rate on the first lien term loan facility to 7.41% and on the second lien term loan facility to 10.67%. The variable benchmark interest rates on eurodollar based loans associated with these instruments ranged from 5.32% to 5.36%.
We were in compliance with all terms of our credit agreements as of June 30, 2007 and are not aware of any future events or transactions that will impact such compliance.
Commitments
In addition to the indebtedness discussed above, we enter into routine operating and capital lease obligations for our facilities and purchase obligations to operate our business. Our contractual commitments, including those related to our indebtedness, were comprised of the following as of June 30, 2007:
|
Payments Due by Period |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contractual Obligation |
Total |
Within 1 year |
1–3 years |
4–5 years |
After 5 years |
||||||||||
ISS acquisition debt including estimated interest(1) | $ | 593,855 | $ | 39,307 | $ | 77,892 | $ | 54,569 | $ | 422,087 | |||||
Operating leases | 23,231 | 5,322 | 8,898 | 7,635 | 1,376 | ||||||||||
Purchase obligation for data | 10,194 | 5,185 | 4,924 | 85 | — | ||||||||||
Deferred purchase price obligation(2) | 1,556 | 191 | 411 | 454 | 500 | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 628,836 | $ | 50,005 | $ | 92,125 | $ | 62,743 | $ | 423,963 | |||||
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not maintain any off-balance sheet arrangements, transactions, obligations or other relationships with unconsolidated entities that would be expected to have a material current or future impact upon our financial condition or results of operations.
Impact of Inflation
Our business may be significantly or adversely affected by inflation. Due to the high degree of competition in the marketplace, inflation rate increases might lead to an erosion of our profit margins.
Effects of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments, which amends SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and SFAS 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. SFAS 155 provides, among other things, that:
72
irrevocable election, on an instrument-by-instrument basis, to measure the hybrid financial instrument at fair value in its entirety, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings; and
The adoption of SFAS 155 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, or FIN 48. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainties in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This interpretation prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. Under FIN 48, the tax effects of a position should be recognized only if it is "more likely-than-not" to be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on its technical merits as of the reporting date. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, or SFAS 157. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS 157 are effective beginning after January 1, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, of SFAS 157 on our financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, or SFAS 159, providing companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. SFAS 159's objective is to reduce both complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. Accounting principles generally accepted within the United States have required different measurement attributes for different assets and liabilities that can create artificial volatility in earnings. SFAS 159 helps to mitigate this type of accounting-induced volatility by enabling companies to report related assets and liabilities at fair value, which would likely reduce the need for companies to comply with detailed rules for hedge accounting. SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of asset and liabilities. SFAS 159 requires companies to provide additional information that will help investors and other users of financial statements to more easily understand the effect of the company's choice to use fair value on its earnings. It also requires entities to display the fair value of these assets and liabilities for which the company has chosen to use fair value on the face of the balance sheet. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, of SFAS 159 on our financial statements.
In September 2006, the SEC issued SAB No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements. This bulletin summarizes the SEC staff's view regarding the process of quantifying financial statement misstatements. SAB No. 108 permits us to adjust for the cumulative effect of immaterial errors relating to prior years in the carrying amount of assets and liabilities as of the beginning of the current fiscal year, with an offsetting adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated deficit in the year of adoption. SAB No. 108 is effective for reporting periods ending after November 15, 2006. We adopted SAB No. 108 during the first quarter of 2007. The application of SAB 108 did not have an impact on our financial statements.
73
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Our primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk associated with short and long-term debt bearing variable interest rates. To manage this interest rate risk exposure, we enter into interest rate swap agreements. We are also exposed to foreign currency risk, which can adversely affect our sales and operating profits.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Note 2 of our audited consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, which provides further information on our derivative instruments.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
To reduce the exposure associated with our variable rate debt, we entered into two interest-rate swap agreements to reduce interest rate risks and to manage interest expense. By entering into these agreements, we change the fixed/variable interest-rate mix of our debt portfolio. As of June 30, 2007, the interest rate swaps had notional amounts of $318.2 million and a fair value of $2.5 million. The agreements effectively convert our floating-rate debt into fixed-rate debt. This reduces our risk of incurring higher interest costs in periods of rising interest rates. Our interest-rate swap agreements hedge a substantial majority of the interest rate risk exposure under our indebtedness. The variable benchmark interest rates on eurodollar based loans associated with these instruments ranged from 5.32% to 5.36%. Since not all of our outstanding indebtedness is covered by the interest rate swap agreements, a hypothetical, instantaneous increase of one percentage point in the interest rates applicable to the variable interest rate debt would have increased our interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2007 by approximately $2.1 million.
Exchange Rate Sensitivity
We have two separate exposures to currency fluctuation risk — subsidiaries outside the United States which use a foreign currency as their functional currency which are translated into U.S. dollars for consolidation and non-U.S. dollar invoiced revenues.
Changes in foreign exchange rates for our subsidiaries that use a foreign currency as their functional currency are translated into U.S. dollars and result in cumulative translation adjustments, which are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss. At June 30, 2007, we had translation exposure to various foreign countries including the Euro, Pounds Sterling, Canadian Dollar, and a limited number of other non-U.S. dollars currencies. The potential loss resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in quoted foreign currency exchange rates, as of June 30, 2007, amounts to $1.0 million.
We generally invoice our clients in U.S. dollars, however, we invoice a portion of clients in Euro, Canadian Dollar, Japanese Yen and a limited number of other non-U.S. dollar currencies.
Related Party Transactions
We have engaged in a number of related party transactions since 2004. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."
74
In the United States, assets managed by registered investment companies have grown at a compound annual rate of approximately 12% to over $11 trillion during the ten years ended December 31, 2006, according to the Investment Company Institute. During the same time period, worldwide hedge fund assets under management, or AUM, have grown at an 18% annual rate, and are now approaching $1.6 trillion, according to research by Hedge Fund Research. Additionally, the variety, complexity and geographic diversity of financial assets held by investors have expanded significantly, resulting in multi-asset class, multi-national portfolios often including derivatives. At the end of 2006, the notional amount of exchange traded and over-the-counter derivatives outstanding worldwide was approximately $485 trillion, a 37% increase over 2005. These derivatives typically include interest rate contracts, credit default swaps, foreign exchange contracts, equity-linked derivatives and commodities and futures contracts.
As a result of increasing complexity of investment strategies, governments and regulatory authorities are increasing the requirements on financial services firms and investment firms to track and report risk as part of their daily operations. For example, the European Union recently required its member countries to adopt policies governing investment managers' risk practices under the auspices of UCITS III. Investment firms managing collective assets for non-sophisticated investors (similar to U.S. mutual fund vehicles) must comply with individual member-states' standards regarding risk measurement and disclosure practices, regardless of where a firm is incorporated if it manages assets on behalf of a member-state's citizens.
To satisfy their risk management needs, firms across the financial services industry have significantly increased their expenditures on portfolio risk management technologies. Financial services firms have traditionally developed these products and services through in-house information technology, or IT, and research and development staffs. However, the increasing scale and specialization needed to support multi-asset class portfolios and complex securities and strategies have, in many cases, caused these firms to turn to more comprehensive products and services from dedicated providers who can furnish more effective solutions than internal development teams. In addition, an increasing number of firms are utilizing risk management solutions from external vendors in order to provide the third party independent risk reports often demanded by their clients. Recent research from CarbonBased Consulting forecasts that, over the next several years, financial institutions' spending on outsourced portfolio and risk management products and services will increase at a compound annual growth rate of 21%. Similarly, Gartner, Inc. forecasts that total financial services outsourced IT spending will reach $565 billion in the same time period.
75
Government regulation is also driving significant changes in governance practices. In the United States, proxy voting is both a legal requirement and a non-discretionary event for many institutional investors. Through its oversight of ERISA, the U.S. Department of Labor requires that pension funds treat their proxy, or right to vote, as an asset which must be exercised. At the same time, the SEC requires mutual funds to disclose to their customers how they voted the proxies of the securities they hold. In the United States, corporate governance-related regulation aimed at issuers, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, further strengthens the focus among investors on governance and related issues. While the United States remains at the forefront of regulation-mandated corporate governance practices, the rest of the world is increasingly adopting U.S.-style corporate governance requirements. This is illustrated by the adoption of the Company Reform Law in the United Kingdom and increased proxy voting requirements in countries such as Germany, Italy and Japan.
The visibility of corporate governance and recognition of the risks associated with poor governance practices have increased significantly during the past several years. Corporate governance has shifted from a compliance function to a business imperative. Whether driven by high-profile corporate scandals or increasing shareholder activism, both investors and issuers are far more cognizant of the consequences of governance practices on their businesses or portfolio returns. Public companies that ignore best practices increasingly risk shareholder dissent and reputation risk. As institutional equity ownership grows, the power of institutional investors to effect change in their portfolio companies has grown in tandem. According to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, institutional ownership in corporate equities has grown at a 13% compound annual rate since 1985. Further, based on Georgeson Inc.'s 2006 Annual Corporate Governance Review, the number of proposals that shareholders have voted on has grown at a 9% compound annual rate since 2002. The increased use of proxy voting power as a tool to motivate companies to demonstrate accountability and transparency has in turn increased demand for proxy voting and other corporate governance services.
Along with the focus on corporate governance, investors are increasingly focusing on environmental and social issues in making investment and proxy voting decisions. This has increased the need for in-depth proxy research as a tool for investors engaging in socially responsible investing. According to the Social Investment Forum, nearly $1 out of every $10 under professional management in the United States is involved in socially responsible investing, totaling $2.3 trillion in 2005. This represents a 358% increase in socially responsible investment AUM from 1995. In addition, a recent study by the Social Investment Research Analysts Network found that nearly 40% the companies in the S&P 100 Index issued annual corporate social responsibility reports in 2005 and nearly 60% of the S&P 100 companies dedicated special sections of their websites to sharing information about their environmental policies and performance.
76
Traditional research models are also undergoing significant change as market forces reshape both the supply of and demand for research products. While traditional Wall Street research retains an important role, investors are increasingly demanding specialized or targeted research that is free from any perceived conflicts of interest or satisfies specific needs. Participants in the financial services industry, including investors, underwriters and regulators, are increasingly demanding specialized research perspectives to better inform their decision-making processes. These specialized services are often used to help identify risk, generate investment opportunities or supplement internal due diligence efforts. As many of the large brokerage firms have reduced the size of their research staffs given new regulatory and economic realities, independent research firms have increased their capabilities. According to Integrity Research Associates, total independent research revenue is expected to increase from $1.8 billion in 2006 to $2.5 billion in 2011.
77
We are a leading provider of risk management and corporate governance products and services to participants in the global financial markets. Our solutions enable our clients to better understand and manage the risks associated with their financial holdings, to provide greater transparency to their internal and external constituencies, to satisfy regulatory and reporting requirements and to make more informed investment decisions. We provide our solutions across multiple asset classes, markets and geographies to a diverse client base including asset managers, hedge funds, pension funds, banks, insurance companies, financial advisors and corporations. As of June 30, 2007, we had approximately 3,300 clients located in 50 countries. Among our clients are 74 of the 100 largest investment managers, 31 of the 50 largest mutual fund companies, 34 of the 50 largest hedge funds, in each case measured by assets under management, each of the 10 largest global investment banks, measured by revenues, and 17 of the 30 OECD central banks.
Our company consists of two industry leading businesses: RiskMetrics and ISS. Together, our products and services comprise what we believe is the most comprehensive suite of risk management and corporate governance solutions available in our industry. Our combined products and services cover the market, credit, portfolio, governance, accounting, legal and environmental risks associated with our clients' financial holdings.
RiskMetrics. RiskMetrics is a leading global provider of multi-asset, position-based risk and wealth management solutions. We provide our clients with comprehensive, interactive solutions that allow them to measure and quantify portfolio risk across security types, geographies and markets. Our flagship RiskManager market risk system integrates consistently-modeled market data with our widely adopted analytical models and robust processing capabilities into a comprehensive risk reporting solution. Our clients access RiskManager through our secure web-based application or engage us to provide fully-outsourced risk reporting services. We deliver our products and services from a common technology and data infrastructure, allowing all of our clients to benefit from advances in our solutions. The breadth, performance and scalability of our RiskManager system is the result of nearly a decade of investment in research and development, which we believe provides us with a significant competitive advantage. RiskMetrics serves a diverse group of approximately 650 clients worldwide.
ISS. ISS is a leading provider of corporate governance and specialized financial research and analysis services to institutional investors and corporations around the world. Through ISS, which we acquired on January 11, 2007, we facilitate the voting of proxies by institutional investors and provide in-depth research and analysis to help inform their voting decisions and assess issuer-specific risk. We offer both global security coverage and fully-integrated, end-to-end solutions, from policy creation to comprehensive research, vote recommendations, reliable vote execution, post-vote disclosure and reporting and analytical tools. Our financial research and analysis services provide our clients with insights into many investment criteria that have become increasingly important to investors, including companies' environmental, social and governance attributes and accounting and compensation polices. On August 1, 2007, in order to further increase our range of specialized financial research and analysis products and services, we acquired CFRA, a leading forensic accounting research firm. ISS serves approximately 2,750 clients.
We sell our products and services primarily on an annual subscription basis and generally receive upfront subscription payments from our clients. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, we generated approximately 91% of our revenues from annual subscriptions to our products and services, for which our clients generally pay us in advance. In addition, during that period, we had a renewal rate of approximately 89%. Our products and services are generally priced based on the number of users who have access to them, as well as based on the volume of data, research, voting or reports purchased. Our
78
experience has been that, over time, our clients have often added users and purchased additional products and services from us, which has led to increases in our revenues per client.
RiskMetrics' hallmarks are significant collaboration with the world's foremost financial institutions, transparency of key analytics, broad academic feedback and client testing. Similarly, ISS actively works with institutional investors, members of the academic community and industry professionals around the world to formulate its recommended policies on key corporate governance and accounting issues. We believe that our collaborative business processes and the connectivity of our products and services will help establish common standards to quantify, assess and articulate many aspects of financial risk.
We serve our global client base through a network of 19 offices in 12 countries. In 2006, approximately 34% of our pro forma revenues were generated from sales to clients located outside the Americas.
Company History
RiskMetrics and ISS are both pioneers in their respective markets.
The RiskMetrics methodology was developed within JPMorgan in 1992 and was published publicly in 1994. In 1998, RiskMetrics was spun off and became an independent company providing risk management products and services.
On January 11, 2007, we acquired ISS in order to increase the scale and scope of our risk management solutions. ISS was founded in 1985 with the goal of promoting good corporate governance practices in the private sector. It was the pioneer in the development of policy-based proxy recommendations and today is a leader in corporate governance with the broadest research coverage in the market.
On August 1, 2007, we completed the acquisition of CFRA. CFRA was founded in 1994 and provides forensic accounting risk research, legal and regulatory risk assessment, due diligence and educational services. Our acquisition of CFRA further increased the range of specialized financial research and analysis products and services that we are able to offer to our clients.
Our Market Opportunity
Our target market is a cross-section of global financial services firms that includes asset managers, hedge funds, commercial and investment banks, pension funds and insurance companies. We also target other market participants, such as third-party advisors and corporations. We believe that a number of key market trends are driving the growth of our business and increasing the value of our solutions to our clients:
Growing Global Financial Markets and Investment Portfolio Complexity. In the United States, assets managed by registered investment companies have grown at a compound annual rate of approximately 12% to over $11 trillion during the ten years ended December 31, 2006, according to the Investment Company Institute. During the same time period, worldwide hedge fund AUM have grown at an 18% annual rate, and are now approaching $1.6 trillion, according to research by Hedge Fund Research. Additionally, the variety, complexity and geographic diversity of financial assets held by investors have expanded significantly, resulting in multi-asset class, multi-national portfolios often including derivatives and other structured products. We believe that this growth in the global financial markets and increasingly broad and diverse investment portfolios will continue to drive demand for our RiskMetrics products and services.
Increasing Demand for Transparency. Investors increasingly need to document their risk profile on a regular basis for both internal audiences, such as risk committees, as well as external constituencies, such as limited partners and regulators. In order to satisfy these demands, comprehensive risk
79
management has become an essential requirement. Furthermore, institutional investors have increasingly used their proxy voting power as a tool to motivate companies to demonstrate better accountability and transparency. We believe that as investors continue to demand greater transparency with respect to multiple dimensions of financial risk, demand for our comprehensive suite of risk management services will continue to grow.
Increasing Regulatory Requirements. Regulatory bodies around the world continue to drive change and create opportunities in the markets we serve. Portfolio risk reporting and measurement regulations, such as UCITS III, U.S. Department of Labor proxy voting requirements and corporate governance- related regulations, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, have increased regulatory compliance requirements and have further emphasized the need for comprehensive risk management tools. We believe the increased focus on regulatory requirements around the world will drive further demand for our products and services.
Increased Focus on Corporate Governance. During the past several years, there has been significant growth in the visibility of corporate governance and recognition of the risks associated with poor governance practices. Whether driven by high-profile corporate scandals or increasing shareholder activism, both investors and issuers are far more cognizant of the consequences of governance practices on their businesses or portfolio returns. Furthermore, investors are increasingly focusing on companies' environmental and social attributes when making investment and proxy voting decisions. We believe that these trends are driving the need for in-depth specialized research as a tool for investors engaging in socially responsible investing and will continue to fuel demand for ISS' products and services.
Increasing Demand for Outsourced Solutions. Many financial services firms are increasingly utilizing outsourced solutions that enable them to focus on their core competencies and provide greater capabilities and are more cost effective than their in-house systems. As third party solutions have improved in quality, reliability, efficiency and scalability, even the largest firms are recognizing the value of outsourcing. In particular, an increasing number of firms are utilizing risk management solutions from external vendors. These vendors provide independent risk reporting services which are often requested by the financial services firms' clients. As a provider of market leading, fully-outsourced risk and governance services, we believe that we will continue to be able to capitalize on this trend.
Our Competitive Strengths
We intend to continue to capitalize on our market opportunity by leveraging the competitive strengths outlined below. We believe these strengths provide us with significant advantages in our markets.
Industry Leading Brands. We believe that each of our brands is among the most established and trusted names in its respective market, providing our clients with widely-recognized products and services. Trust, reliability and confidence are of paramount importance to our clients, as they rely on our solutions to help make critical investment decisions. Our products and services are widely used throughout the industry, and we believe we are helping to establish common standards for risk management and corporate governance. We believe that the prominence of our brands combined with our long track record, proven capabilities and well-known and thorough reporting capabilities have helped us to create and maintain our market leadership positions.
Comprehensive Market Coverage. Our products and services incorporate what we believe to be among the broadest data sets of any provider in our industry. RiskMetrics' database includes over four million active global securities across 150,000 issuers, spanning 200 countries, 220 exchanges, 11,000 global benchmarks and over 750,000 market data time series updated every business day. In addition, our analytical models cover almost all of the equity, fixed income and derivative securities held in our clients' portfolios. This comprehensive coverage is critical to our business as most of our clients are
80
sophisticated multi-asset class investors who hold a variety of complex global positions. Similarly, in 2006 ISS provided proxy research and vote recommendations for more than 38,000 shareholder meetings across 100 countries and voted approximately 7.6 million ballots on behalf of our clients, representing almost 700 million shares. Importantly, both RiskMetrics and ISS have a presence in key financial centers around the world which allows us to combine our global data coverage with local market expertise. We believe that the breadth of our offering differentiates us from our competitors and provides us with a significant competitive advantage.
Leading Market Risk Methodology. We are a leader in the multi-asset class risk management market. Our transparent risk methodology was originally published in 1994 and has evolved through a decade of research and development, client input and collaboration with the world's foremost financial institutions and leading academics. We believe our commitment to transparency and collaboration has resulted in our methodologies being among the financial industry's most studied, trusted and implemented frameworks for risk management. We believe that our market risk methodology has become a widely accepted model for risk analysis and reporting and provides us with a significant competitive advantage.
Fully-Outsourced Solution. Increasingly, many of our RiskMetrics clients rely on us for a fully-outsourced risk reporting solution, which typically includes automated importation of client positions, matching of client positions with our security terms and conditions data and automatic production of risk reports. Our solutions leverage our technology and data infrastructure, which has the capacity to process millions of positions and thousands of reports each night. Since we deliver our services from a common technology and data infrastructure, all of our clients benefit from advances in our RiskManager market risk system. We believe that the ability to provide this level of processing capacity and service differentiates us from our competitors and provides us with a significant competitive advantage.
Similarly, we can provide our ISS clients with a scalable, fully-outsourced proxy research and voting service. This service typically includes standard benchmark guidelines or custom voting policies, comprehensive research coverage and high volume, reliable, integrated electronic proxy voting and regulatory reporting. These products and services are all delivered through our integrated Governance Analytics platform which allows clients to research and vote their shares. We believe that no competitor has the comprehensiveness of coverage, combined with the processing capacity and flexible client delivery platform that we offer to our clients.
Global, Diversified Client Base. We have a global footprint, which allows us to support our highly- diversified client base across numerous geographies with in-depth analysis based on local knowledge. As of June 30, 2007, our client base included approximately 2,100 financial institutions and 1,200 corporations and professional service organizations located in 50 countries. Among our clients are 74 of the 100 largest investment managers, 31 of the largest 50 mutual fund companies, 34 of the 50 largest hedge funds, in each case measured by assets under management, each of the 10 largest global investment banks and 17 of the 30 OECD central banks. No client or group of affiliated clients represented more than 2.1% of our pro forma revenues in 2006 and our top 20 clients and their affiliates represented less than 13.1%. Our client base is geographically diverse as well, with 34% of our pro forma revenues for 2006 generated from sales to clients located outside of the Americas. We believe the quality and diversity of our client base further enhances our position as a leader in our markets, provides significant revenue stability and insulates us from being negatively affected by the loss of any one, or group, of clients. Finally, we believe that the size, breadth and convergence of our customer base provides us with visibility into relevant market trends and evolving customer needs.
Attractive Business Model. We sell our services primarily on an annual subscription basis and receive upfront annual payments from our clients. In addition, we typically experience high recurring revenues as a percentage of total revenues and high renewal rates. For the six months ended June 30,
81
2007, our recurring revenue as a percentage of our total revenues, and renewal rates, were approximately 91% and 89%, respectively. We do not price our products and services based on our clients' assets under management. As a result, we are not subject to revenue fluctuations resulting from changes in our clients' AUM. Since many of our costs benefit from economies of scale, we are able to add new clients with less than pro rata incremental expense. These factors, combined with our low capital expenditure requirements, have historically resulted in significant cash flow generation. We expect that our business model will continue to provide us with the financial resources needed to reinvest in our existing businesses and pursue select acquisition opportunities.
Distinct Corporate Culture. Our ability to develop new products and services has been, and will continue to be, crucial to keeping pace with evolving financial markets. Consequently, we believe that our success will continue to depend on the strength of our intellectual capital, and that our employees and distinct corporate culture provide us with significant competitive advantages. We work hard to retain our employees by ensuring that they have a challenging, rewarding and fun environment in which to work. We also encourage our employees to follow their instincts and develop new ideas, which has resulted in the development of many of our most important solutions. At the same time, we strive to engender a team spirit and sense of common purpose, which we believe enables us to attract and retain talented employees.
We believe that all of our employees should hold an ownership stake in our company since a broad-based employee ownership structure closely aligns the incentives of our employees and stockholders. Through stock ownership and option grants, our employees currently own more than one-third of our common stock and options on a fully diluted basis (before giving effect to this offering) and have the opportunity to earn additional shares of common stock through incentive compensation.
Our Growth Strategy
Our growth strategy is to increase sales to our existing clients, to expand our client base and to extend and enhance our portfolio of risk management and corporate governance products and services. We intend to continue to develop and sell solutions that enable investors to make more informed investment decisions, monitor and comply with exposure and risk limits, provide greater transparency to both internal audiences and external constituencies and meet regulatory and reporting requirements. The major components of our growth strategy are as follows:
Increase Sales to Existing Clients. A significant portion of our historical growth has been driven by our success in increasing the value of the products and services which we provide to our clients. We plan to broaden our relationships with our clients in the following ways:
82
The success of this strategy is demonstrable. In the six months ended June 30, 2007, approximately 50% of our new subscription annualized contract value resulted from sales to existing customers. Further, our average contract value has significantly increased over the last five years.
Expand our Client Base. We plan to continue to pursue the following initiatives to further expand our client base:
We have evidenced a strong track record of adding new clients. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, we added over $13 million of new annualized contract value from new clients.
Enhance and Extend our Products and Services. We plan to continue to augment our suite of risk management and corporate governance products and services in the following ways:
83
RiskMetrics
Overview
RiskMetrics is a leading provider of multi-asset, position-based risk and wealth management solutions to global asset managers, hedge funds, banks, insurance companies, pension funds and wealth managers. Our methodologies are among the world's most broadly-accepted standards for risk measurement. Our philosophy is that portfolio risk management solutions and the methodologies and algorithms used to model positions and forecast risk should be transparent and accessible. Our transparent methodology was originally published in 1994. Since then, it has evolved based on continued innovation and advances made by our research and development team and collaboration with our clients and leading academics.
We provide our clients with access to customizable applications, interactive analytics and risk reports based on comprehensive and consistently-modeled market data that are fully-integrated with their holdings. We believe that our comprehensive approach to analyzing multi-asset portfolios and our ability to fully integrate with our clients' holdings enable us to provide products and services which are an integral and essential part of our clients' portfolio risk management systems. These products and services provide timely and actionable insights into the market and credit risks of clients' portfolios.
Our comprehensive suite of products and services covers a broad range of asset classes including equities, bonds, commodities, foreign exchange, futures, options, derivatives, structured products, interest-rate products and credit products and is designed to provide our clients with a transparent assessment of the risk in their portfolios, including solutions in the following three areas: Market Risk, Credit Risk and Wealth Management.
These products and services allow our clients to:
84
All of our RiskMetrics products and services include integrated access to our extensive set of market-related data. Embedded within our RiskMetrics offerings are over 750,000 market data time series spanning global interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices, implied volatilities, credit spreads, commodity prices and inflation rates. These data are systematically quality-controlled by our dedicated teams of analysts who examine the data for outliers, missing data points and other anomalies. These data are then transformed into a form suitable for use in risk management systems. We also collect and process international benchmark data for thousands of equity, fixed-income and commodity indices. These data are used by asset managers and pension plans who track standard or customized benchmarks as well as by clients to measure their risk and exposure relative to an index.
Depending upon the solution offering, our RiskMetrics products and services are available through a variety of delivery options, including hosted web-based applications, fully-outsourced managed services, local installation and on a component-by-component basis.
Market Risk
Managing the risk inherent in our clients' portfolios has become a difficult task for both asset and portfolio managers. Increasingly complex instruments, expanding asset classes, complex trading strategies and significant data requirements have created a complicated risk assessment task. Our approach is to combine all the analytics, technologies and data required into one comprehensive suite of solutions, accessible through a common portal. Through our solutions, risk managers at all levels of sophistication can receive accurate, timely and clear measures of risk.
During 2006, our Market Risk offerings accounted for approximately 80% of RiskMetrics' revenue. Our Market Risk products consist of RiskManager and its related services, HedgePlatform and DataMetrics. Although we sometimes sell our data on a stand alone basis, our data are usually embedded in our products and services.
RiskManager
RiskManager, our flagship market risk system, provides clients with a comprehensive solution for measuring risk in their portfolios and for running sensitivity and stress test analyses. RiskManager combines all the analytics, technologies and data required for risk analysis into one comprehensive suite of solutions. Underlying RiskManager is a service-oriented architecture which is flexible, scalable and extensible. Because we host our solutions and deliver our services from a scalable common technology and data infrastructure, all of our clients benefit from advances in our RiskManager market risk system.
85
RiskManager incorporates three primary components: delivery mechanisms, a services platform and the core risk elements, as shown in the following diagram:
Delivery Mechanisms
Our delivery mechanisms enable our clients to access risk analyses and reports in one of three methods: as an interactive web-based application operated in a self-directed fashion, as a fully-outsourced or managed service offering in which RiskMetrics utilizes the system on behalf of the client, or as a web service in which a client's systems access our core risk elements by connecting directly to our systems. Each of these methods involves varying degrees of interaction with the key components of our system.
When accessed as a web-based application, clients have complete control over when and how often they upload positions and holdings into the system application. They can create their own ad hoc analysis, build dynamic "what-if" scenarios, design custom reports for immediate use, run intra-day pre-trade tests and schedule their own overnight data processing and report generation.
As a fully-outsourced or managed service, we configure the services platform to create a customized risk reporting service for our clients. In doing so we take on the additional responsibility of uploading the client's positions and holdings from the client's internal systems, fund administrator, broker or custodian, schedule and direct the running of all risk analyses, and produce risk reports our clients use for their internal and external requirements. Clients subscribing to our managed services typically receive a detailed service level agreement outlining production requirements, run times and data coverage.
Web service clients bypass our other delivery mechanisms and instead have their own systems connect directly to our core risk elements. Clients typically use our web service solutions to seamlessly embed the functionality available in RiskManager directly into their own systems and interfaces.
86
Services Platform
Our proprietary platform is at the core of our scalable services-oriented architecture and allows us to manage many processes and solutions simultaneously. The platform orchestrates the flow of information between us and our clients as well as directs the internal operations of our risk elements. Using today's latest server technologies, our platform allows us to simultaneously process millions of positions for hundreds of clients per day. The platform is monitored 24 hours a day, seven days a week by a group of dedicated operations engineers to ensure peak performance of the entire system.
Core Risk Elements
The core risk elements underlying RiskManager represent our key intellectual property and consist of significant amounts of data, complex analytical models and proprietary software applications. These elements include:
HedgePlatform
HedgePlatform is a reporting service allowing clients that invest in hedge funds, including funds of funds, pension funds and endowments, to measure, evaluate and monitor the risk of their hedge fund investments across multiple hedge fund strategies. We collect position-level information from hedge funds on a monthly basis and provide our clients with a risk report for each individual hedge fund in which they invest as well as an aggregate risk report for their overall portfolio of hedge funds. HedgePlatform reports include statistics such as exposure (long, short, net and gross), sensitivities, scenario analysis, stress tests and VAR analysis.
DataMetrics
DataMetrics is a data service that allows clients to access the market data embedded in RiskManager for use in their own proprietary or other third-party systems. In addition to direct access to over 750,000 market data time series, DataMetrics can provide clients with customized data processing services.
Credit Risk
CreditManager. Our credit risk products and services allow our clients to consolidate multiple types of credit exposures across an institution. Our CreditManager product is a portfolio credit risk
87
management system used primarily by banks to calculate economic capital, facilitate risk-based pricing and measure risk concentrations. The application is designed to consolidate and compare risks and opportunities across multiple credit exposures including bonds, credit derivatives and traditional lending.
Wealth Management
WealthBench. WealthBench is an investment planning platform for private banks, financial advisors, brokerages and trust companies. WealthBench delivers fully-informed, tailored investment planning proposals for high net worth individuals reflecting their needs, goals and risk tolerances while remaining consistent with firm-driven investment and risk-based policies. WealthBench incorporates robust analytics, market-consistent inputs and transparent methodologies.
Risk Compliance. We provide portfolio risk statistics to the affluent and mass-affluent segments of consumer banks to allow their financial advisors to ensure compliance with clients' stated investment policies and risk tolerances at the point of sale and monitor compliance on an ongoing basis. The service was introduced in 2007.
Pricing
The pricing model for our RiskMetrics products and services is primarily subscription-based, typically for a period of one year. Our clients typically pay up front. RiskManager's fees are based on the number of users, the data sets required for the analysis, the volume of positions and the complexity of reports generated. Each contract consists of a product fee, which includes the use of RiskMetrics' data and analytics, while some contracts include managed service fees for additional processing and service, which is volume based. Many of our managed services clients receive Service Level Agreements, or SLAs, that explicitly define the level of service we are required to provide under the agreement. Our pricing structure is not linked to our clients' AUM levels.
Pricing for stand-alone DataMetrics data is based on the amount and specific data sets purchased. The fees for HedgePlatform are based on the number of hedge funds in the client's portfolio. Pricing for our WealthBench services is based upon the number of users.
Clients
Our approximately 650 clients worldwide rely on us for their portfolio risk management needs. Our RiskMetrics clients include leading asset managers, hedge funds, pension funds, commercial and investment banks, central banks, insurance companies, private banks and regulators.
RiskMetrics' client base is diversified by segment and geography with no one client, other than JPMorgan, accounting for greater than 2% of RiskMetrics' 2006 revenue. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, RiskMetrics' renewal rate was approximately 88%. As of June 30, 2007, RiskMetrics' annual contract value by segment was distributed approximately as follows: 40% asset management; 30% alternative investments; 27% commercial and investment banking and trading; and 3% corporate, professional services and other. As of June 30, 2007 our clients in the Americas, EMEA and Asia, comprised approximately 48%, 43% and 9% of RiskMetrics' annualized contract value, respectively.
Competition
We believe that we are the market leader in the multi-asset risk management category and have significant market share in this segment. Our largest source of competition is in-house IT and development staffs or legacy risk management systems. We believe that we can provide clients with a superior product and service offering at a lower cost to clients than internal departments. Also, the growing trend towards outsourcing IT functions will benefit us as we believe that there are few external providers who can provide the same scope of services that we provide to our clients. Our primary
88
competition includes Bear Stearns' Bear Measurisk unit, BlackRock Inc.'s BlackRock Solutions unit, DST Systems Inc., Fimalac S.A.'s Algorithmics unit, Moody Corporation's KMV unit, MSCI Inc.'s Barra unit and SunGard Data Systems Inc. Our RiskMetrics business competes primarily on the basis of product and service functionality and level of service provided.
ISS
Overview
ISS is a leading provider of corporate governance and financial research and analysis services to institutional investors and corporations around the world. We facilitate the voting of proxies by institutional investors and provide in-depth research and analysis to help inform their voting decisions and assess issuer-specific risk. ISS' products and services consist of: proxy services to institutional investors and financial research and analysis services to institutional investors, corporations and professional service firms. The majority of ISS' solutions are delivered through our Governance Analytics web-based platform.
We provide proxy services to institutional investors globally. We are the largest proxy advisory firm that offers a fully-integrated, end-to-end proxy voting solution, including policy creation, comprehensive research, vote recommendations, reliable vote execution and reporting and analytical tools. Although some of our proxy research and voting clients purchase our proxy research on a stand-alone basis, the vast majority purchase a comprehensive research and voting solution.
In 2006, we issued proxy research and vote recommendations for more than 38,000 shareholder meetings across 100 countries and voted, on behalf of our clients, 7.6 million ballots representing almost 700 million shares. We believe these amounts are substantially more than any of our competitors. As of June 30, 2007, we served approximately 1,150 financial institutions that together manage an estimated $20.0 trillion. During 2006, our Proxy Services products accounted for approximately 78% of ISS' revenues.
We also offer financial research and analysis solutions designed to assess the overall financial health of companies by analyzing the investment implications of companies' accounting policies, legal and regulatory exposure, environmental, social and governance practices, mergers and acquisitions initiatives and compensation plans. Our services and solutions are provided primarily to portfolio managers for investment analysis, to corporations to monitor compliance with corporate governance practices and to professional services organizations to support due diligence efforts. These offerings are either bundled with other services or sold on an individual basis and allow investors to add specialized, qualitative analysis to more traditional research used in the investment decision-making process.
Proxy Services
We categorize our Proxy Services products into three distinct product lines: Proxy Research and Voting, Global Proxy Distribution Services and Securities Class Action Services.
Proxy Research and Voting
Through our Governance Analytics platform, we provide our clients with vote recommendations, comprehensive analyses and online voting capabilities that enable users to make informed decisions about how to vote on all items with respect to each shareholder meeting agenda that we cover, execute their votes and monitor and track their votes for reporting purposes. Our proxy research and voting staff currently operates out of nine offices around the world, providing a global network of local expertise.
89
The following diagram illustrates our proxy research and voting services and how they integrate into the flow of the proxy process:
Proxy Research. We provide research coverage on over 7,400 U.S.-based companies and approximately 22,000 non-U.S. companies. Our standard global coverage includes Morgan Stanley EAFE stocks, FTSE All-Share and TSE 300 listings, selected Goldman Sachs/FTA securities, the first section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange, selected sponsored ADRs from a broad range of countries as well as securities in emerging markets. The size, breadth and experience of the research team allows ISS to maximize an in-depth understanding of local business practices, proxy voting requirements, language and culture across most developed corporate governance markets globally.
ISS' policy board works to ensure that ISS' voting policies are developed and applied within a framework of corporate governance best practices. ISS actively works with institutional clients, the academic community and industry professionals around the world to gather input on its proxy voting policies. Each year, through an annual policy survey of our institutional clients and other forums, institutional investors are invited to share their ideas on corporate governance issues including board structure, executive compensation, mergers and acquisitions and corporate accountability to ensure that our standard voting policies are aligned with the views of our institutional clients.
Our proxy research and voting recommendations are based on the application of ISS' voting policies to the particular voting items on an issuer's agenda. Our research and recommendations are produced based on benchmark, specialized and custom policies.
ISS develops separate benchmark policies for U.S. securities and non-U.S. securities. ISS' non-U.S. benchmark policies are adjusted to address in-country concerns. ISS' benchmark policies serve as an industry standard and best practice guide to corporate governance.
In addition to our benchmark policies, we recognize that the philosophies and policies used to make proxy voting decisions range widely among different types of investors. Understanding the diverse needs of our clients, we are able to create policies that meet their requirements through a number of specialized policies such as SRI policies based on environmentally and socially responsible guidelines and our Taft-Hartley policy which is based on AFL-CIO guidelines. For many institutional investors with highly specialized or unique needs for proxy research and policy, we also offer custom proxy advisory services in which we work with our clients to develop and refine governance policy guidelines that match their particular views and are unique to them.
In addition to the policy-based research resulting in recommendations, we also provide non-recommendation-based governance research services with comprehensive impartial proxy voting analyses currently on approximately 5,200 U.S. and over 5,900 non-U.S. companies in 70 markets.
Proxy Voting. Our proxy voting services include notifying clients of upcoming shareholder meetings, receiving proxy ballots from third-party proxy distributors, generating consolidated proxy ballots and instructions across our clients' portfolios, executing and tabulating our clients' votes in
90
accordance with their instructions, maintaining voting records and providing comprehensive vote reporting.
Utilizing our Governance Analytics platform, our integrated platform for proxy voting and research as well as our research and analytics products, proxy administrators and investment managers are able to access timely governance data and ensure efficient and reliable vote execution in a highly automated fashion. Our vote reporting lets our clients stay informed and empowered with accurate and timely information, including full vote audit trails and intra-day updates of all fund, meeting and agenda information. In addition to daily audits and detailed vote reconciliation, we conduct automated, end-of-day production checks to ensure all votes are executed accurately.
Our account representatives and voting operations professionals worldwide provide expert guidance and dedicated support to make sure all clients' votes are cast in accordance with their established proxy guidelines. In addition, we have a Straight Through Processing, or STP, arrangement with Broadridge (formerly ADP Proxy Services) with respect to U.S. and global ballots. This STP arrangement allows for ballots to be received and proxy votes to be made electronically, minimizing the manual aspects of the proxy voting process and limiting the risk of error inherent in manual processes. This STP arrangement and other arrangements with third party ballot distributors and custodians have allowed our number of ballots processed to increase from two million in 2000 to 7.6 million in 2006.
Vote Disclosure is a cost-effective proxy voting solution to help U.S. investment companies comply with the SEC disclosure rules and give shareholders easy access to institutional voting records. For users of this service, we collect, report and record the information required by the SEC in the Form N-PX and provide users with reports and a personalized, easily navigable web site for public vote and proxy policy disclosure.
Global Proxy Distribution Services ("GPD")
Our GPD service offers a complete global proxy distribution solution to custodian banks for non-U.S. securities through a single, independent platform. GPD provides for the efficient distribution and voting of proxies, giving clients the ability to review and download detailed meeting information and individualized account information. GPD also provides online access to customized record-keeping and reporting, across all custodians and sub-custodians.
Securities Class Action Services ("SCAS")
We deliver a complete, class action monitoring and claims filing service to institutional investors who have a stake in class action lawsuits. We provide a comprehensive securities litigation database, including up-to-date case information and 17 years of detailed historical class action data, and provide fully-outsourced notification, tracking and claims filing services to our institutional clients. Our arrangements with claims administrators and law firms around the world enable us to advise on new developments in global markets and streamline the filing process.
SCAS offers more detailed, portfolio specific views of cases and settlements, with an online report library that allows clients to keep track of the complete securities class action lifecycle, from when a case is first identified until payment is disbursed. Securities class action data provided to our clients include class periods, settlement dates, status reports, award amounts, claim deadline dates, claims administrator details and pertinent related data.
Financial Research and Analysis
We provide specialized financial research and analysis products and services to asset managers, hedge funds, corporations and professional services firms across many dimensions of risk, governance, accounting, environmental, social and legal issues. Most of our financial research and analysis products and services are delivered through our integrated Governance Analytics platform. We recently acquired
91
CFRA to broaden our financial research and analysis products and services suite. Throughout its history, CFRA has provided early warnings on numerous high profile accounting irregularities in North America and Europe, including many of the major accounting scandals and key issues such as options backdating and pension accounting reform.
Our financial research and analysis offerings fall into four general categories: CFRA Forensic Accounting Research, Environmental Social and Governance Services, M&A Edge and Compensation Services.
CFRA Forensic Accounting Research
Through a rigorous and proprietary research process, our global team of analysts assesses the reported financial results of over 10,000 companies worldwide. We focus on providing our clients with timely and actionable risk analysis regarding earnings and cash flow quality and sustainability, legal and regulatory risk and overall business health. Our clients rely on our continuous analysis and objective perspective.
CFRA's largest product is Accounting Lens, a leading forensic accounting risk research offering for investors, providing early warning signals for companies showing signs of operational or financial distress. The offering consists of in-depth company research, educational and industry research, access to our proprietary earnings quality database and research analyst contact. CFRA recently launched a new service, Legal Edge, which is focused on identifying and analyzing hidden legal and regulatory risks. CFRA also provides customized research services for client-defined projects.
Environmental, Social and Governance Services
Our ES&G Research and Analytics services include screening and modeling tools that allow institutional investors to apply socially responsible guidelines to portfolios, understand the implications of restrictions on portfolios, and examine company-specific profiles. These services also include our Corporate Governance Quotient, or CGQ, quantitative ratings of corporate securities based on relative attractiveness of their corporate governance profiles. Our services also help clients manage portfolio risk by incorporating an in-depth set of quantitative and qualitative ES&G information into their investment decision making processes.
Our ES&G Analytics provides sector-based research reports on over 5,000 companies across more than 80 social and environmental issues. These reports are designed to summarize key issues and to facilitate discussions on social and environmental policies between institutional investor clients and global companies. Relative scoring data for each company enable investors to compare performance and capabilities across industry sectors to assess a company's progress towards best practices.
Our CGQ ratings currently cover more than 7,400 companies across 34 countries, with underlying data for up to 70 individual corporate governance variables. Areas of particular focus include board of directors, audit, charter and bylaw provisions, anti-takeover provisions and executive and director compensation. We sell our CGQ ratings to both asset managers for portfolio construction and monitoring and corporations to help them assess the strength of their corporate governance practices.
92
M&A Edge
Our M&A Edge service provides an independent, in-depth analysis that focuses specifically on proposed merger and acquisition deals and proxy contests to inform institutional investors. This offering complements our traditional proxy research by providing the same foundational analysis and vote recommendation, but also delivers ongoing deal notes that keep users abreast of key events as the deal or contest evolves. Coverage continues as issues develop, from the date of announcement through the shareholder vote. The analysis covers key aspects of a transaction, including strategic rationale, corporate governance and shareholder rights issues.
Compensation Advisory Services
We provide a set of turnkey solutions and services that enable compensation professionals and committee members to optimize compensation plan design by modeling, analyzing and benchmarking executive compensation. Our Compensation Advisory Services provide access to experienced and dedicated compensation plan analysts and support to our client in modeling the cost of equity compensation plans and determining optimal compensation plan design. Alternatively, we provide a web-based compensation modeling tool, Compass, that measures the cost of equity-based incentive plans using a binomial option pricing model.
Pricing
The pricing model for ISS' products is primarily subscription-based and varies depending on the product or service purchased. Our proxy research and voting services are generally priced based on the number of research reports generated, the number of executed ballots and a base fee for access to our Governance Analytics platform. We charge a single database access fee for our SCAS service and fees based on the number of securities or accounts held in a customer's portfolio. Our Accounting Lens product is priced based on the number of sectors that a customer accesses. Our CGQ Institutional, ES&G Analytics and M&A Edge products are sold on an annual subscription basis. Our CGQ Corporate and Compensation and Advisory Services are generally priced based on a corporate customer's market capitalization. The vast majority of clients pay up front for contracted usage levels. Our pricing structure is not linked to our clients' AUM levels.
Clients
Approximately 1,550 financial institutions and 1,200 corporations and professional service organizations worldwide rely on ISS for their corporate governance, proxy voting and financial research and analysis needs. Clients of our financial research and analysis services generally include institutional investors, hedge funds, insurance underwriters and diversified financial institutions. We also provide our financial research and analytical services to corporations and regulatory bodies worldwide.
ISS' client base is diversified, with no one client accounting for greater than 2% of our 2006 ISS revenue. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, ISS' renewal rate was approximately 90%. As of June 30, 2007, ISS' annualized contract value by end market was distributed approximately as follows: 82% asset managers, 3% alternative investments and 15% corporate, professional services and other clients. As of June 30, 2007, ISS' clients in the Americas, EMEA and Asia comprised approximately 78%, 17% and 5% of ISS' annualized contract value, respectively.
Our ISS business serves both institutional and corporate clients and we recognize that there is a potential for conflict of interest with respect to the provision of products and services to corporate issuers and the products and services we provide to our institutional investor clients. We have instituted multiple safeguards to mitigate any real or perceived conflicts of interests. We have formed a subsidiary that provides governance services to corporations. This subsidiary, ISS Corporate Services, has distinct resources and a firewall that prevents the flow of information from ISS Corporate Services to ISS. Every ISS Corporate Services contract indicates that the purchase of corporate services will not result
93
in preferential treatment from ISS and does not influence ISS' proxy recommendations or CGQ scores. Recommendations and CGQ scores are based solely on the application of ISS' published policies and by an issuer's actual governance policies and practices.
Competition
We believe that the vast majority of the market which does not currently use our proxy services consists of institutional investors who vote their proxies themselves or do not vote at all. As the fiduciary and record keeping requirements related to proxies continue to grow, more institutional investors are choosing to outsource these functions.
For those clients who do outsource proxy research and voting, we compete with a limited number of providers. Glass, Lewis & Co., or Glass Lewis, and Proxy Governance, Inc. are our closest proxy voting and corporate governance competitors. Broadridge (formerly ADP Proxy Services) also provides a limited voting platform to institutional investors, which competes with our own proxy voting offerings. In addition, we compete with local niche proxy voting and research providers in certain international markets. Our research and analysis services compete with various participants in the market for research services, including sell-side research firms and niche providers, such as Gradient Analytics, Behind the Numbers and Glass Lewis. We believe that none of our competitors have the scale and scope to provide the breadth of our services across client segments and geographies. ISS competes primarily on the basis of product and service functionality and level of service provided.
Research and Development and Operations
Our research and development and operations teams consisted of approximately 400 individuals at June 30, 2007. These teams are responsible for both our product development efforts and the development and support of our operational infrastructure. For information relating to our level of research and development spending over the last three years, see our consolidated financial statements included in the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.
RiskMetrics
Research and Development
Our research and development team is responsible for our risk research, data and analytics engineering, infrastructure and application development, testing, implementation and deployment. The team's years of collaborative innovation and research with our clients, which include many of the world's leading financial institutions, has resulted in an institutional knowledge which we believe would require substantial time and investment to replicate. We seek to maintain this competitive advantage through significant ongoing investment in research and development.
Our products and services have evolved over more than a decade from a single desktop application to our current comprehensive product and service offerings. Our research and development group, combined with our technology and comprehensive solutions allow RiskMetrics' clients to outsource risk processes at the core of their businesses. Our research and development group consists of specialized teams including:
94
Operations
Our operations group manages the internal technical infrastructure of RiskMetrics (including data centers, networks and telecommunications) and the daily operational elements of our hosted applications which run all analytics, data and client processes. Daily functions include processing our market data time series, securities reference data and benchmarks from our global data providers, loading and processing millions of client positions and monitoring and ensuring peak performance. Our primary operations are hosted at two redundant data centers in New York City and Boston, connected together via a secure network. We also host two additional data centers in Switzerland. We maintain RiskMetrics' operations teams in New York, London, Oklahoma and Singapore.
ISS
Research, Development and Operations
ISS has invested in systems, processes and controls to handle an increase in transactions processed between 2000 (two million ballots) and 2006 (7.6 million ballots). We have a technology infrastructure and a proven track record in automating and scaling operationally complex and time critical tasks. ISS' proxy research and voting business is seasonal in nature with over 70% of transactions occurring in a three-month period. Our ISS development team has created integrated processing systems which have been developed in a scalable architecture linked to a centralized data warehouse.
ISS' clients outsource tasks to ISS over which they have a fiduciary responsibility. We have had success in meeting client requirements while also increasing our transactional volume through increased automation and by leveraging our operations center in Manila, Philippines, which has grown in the last five years to over 150 employees. This operations center reduces the operational cost per transaction and has been a key component of our success.
The ISS research and development team also supports ISS' Governance Analytics platform which provides our clients with complete transparency related to the outsource arrangement they have in place with ISS.
Our technology infrastructure is hosted at a primary data center in Virginia with a redundant backup data center in Arizona. Our main operations hubs are in Maryland, the Philippines and the United Kingdom.
Sales, Marketing and Client Support
We sell our products and services primarily through direct interaction with our clients. As of June 30, 2007, we had a sales force of 85 people in ten offices around the world. Sales employees are compensated on a salary and commission basis.
Our account management staff is composed of approximately 125 employees in 11 offices worldwide. Account managers are assigned to our clients based on geographic location and client type.
95
Our account management team works closely with our clients to optimize our clients' use of our products and services, and we believe that our account management team's product knowledge and local presence differentiates us from our competition.
Our marketing and communications team supports all of our business units with the aim of helping us increase sales, generate qualified sales leads, enhance our brand, increase our visibility, improve the client experience and educate the financial community about risk and governance. Key areas of focus include communications and industry outreach and event management. The team also proactively manages our relationship with the media, which frequently seeks our opinion on industry issues, particularly in the area of corporate governance.
Government Regulation
ISS is a registered investment advisor and must comply with the requirements of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and related SEC regulations. Such requirements relate to, among other things, disclosure obligations, recordkeeping and reporting requirements, marketing restrictions and general anti-fraud prohibitions.
Employees
Our employee base is comprised of talented people from diverse backgrounds. Our employees have extensive experience at prominent financial institutions and Fortune 500 companies. As of June 30, 2007, we had approximately 973 full time employees in 12 countries, including a highly-skilled proxy research, research and development and operations staff of nearly 660 professionals. During the proxy season (March to July), ISS typically retains approximately 150 temporary employees.
We believe that we maintain good working relationships with our employees. None of our employees is subject to a collective bargaining agreement.
Properties
Headquartered in New York City, we maintain a global presence with offices throughout the United States as well as in 11 other countries. Our New York City facility contains approximately 35,000 square feet and the lease relating to this facility expires in July 2012. ISS is headquartered in Rockville, Maryland. Our Rockville facility contains approximately 64,000 square feet, and the lease relating to this facility expires in July 2012. We recently entered into a lease on a property to serve as our London office for both RiskMetrics and ISS. Our new London facility contains approximately 26,000 square feet and our lease expires in August 2012. We intend to move into our new London facility at the end of 2007. In connection with our new lease, we do not intend to renew our two other London leases which expire in mid-2008.
We also have smaller offices which support our operations locally in: Amsterdam, Netherlands; Ann Arbor, Michigan; Brussels, Belgium; Cambridge, Massachusetts; Chicago, Illinois; Frankfurt, Germany; Geneva, Switzerland; Iselin, New Jersey; Manila, Philippines; Melbourne, Australia; Norman, Oklahoma; Paris, France; Singapore; Tokyo, Japan; Toronto, Canada; and Washington, District of Columbia.
Legal Proceedings
We are not presently involved in any material legal proceedings. However, during the ordinary course of business, we are, from time to time, threatened with, or may become a party to, legal actions and other proceedings.
96
Executive Officers and Directors
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our executive officers and directors, including their ages as of August 30, 2007:
Name |
Age |
Title |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
M. Ethan Berman | 45 | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman | ||
David Obstler | 47 | Chief Financial Officer | ||
Richard Leggett | 39 | Head of ISS Business | ||
Jorge Mina | 32 | Co-Head of RiskMetrics Business | ||
Gregg Berman | 41 | Co-Head of RiskMetrics Business | ||
Peter Bernard | 49 | Director | ||
Philip Duff | 50 | Director | ||
Rene Kern | 44 | Director | ||
Arthur Levitt | 76 | Director | ||
Christopher Mitchell | 35 | Director | ||
Stephen Thieke | 60 | Lead Independent Director | ||
Robert Trudeau | 38 | Director |
Executive Officers
M. Ethan Berman. M. Ethan Berman is our chief executive officer and serves as the chairman of our board of directors. Mr. Berman was one of our founding members at the time of our spin-off from JPMorgan in 1998 and has served as our chief executive officer since such time and as chairman of our board of directors since June 2004. Prior to our spin-off, Mr. Berman was a managing director at JPMorgan and was responsible for the firm's Risk Management Services Group. As head of that group, he led JPMorgan's risk advisory work, including the development of risk products such as RiskManager and CreditManager. Mr. Berman joined JPMorgan in 1987 as a bond trader. Mr. Berman has a B.A. from Williams College.
David Obstler. David Obstler is our chief financial officer and has served as such since January 2005. From 2000 to 2004, he was chief financial officer and executive vice president of corporate development for Pinnacor Inc., a NASDAQ publicly listed provider of software and services to the financial services industry. Prior to that, he was an investment banker at Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers and JPMorgan. He has a B.A. from Yale University and an M.B.A. from the Harvard School of Business.
Richard Leggett. Richard Leggett is head of our ISS business and has served as such since our acquisition of CFRA on August 1, 2007. Prior to that, he served as chief executive officer of CFRA since 2005. Before joining CFRA, he was a managing director at Goldman Sachs in New York and London, where he worked in the research division from 2000 until 2004 and the investment banking division from 2004 until 2005. Mr. Leggett has a B.S. from Georgetown University.
Jorge Mina. Jorge Mina has served as co-head of our RiskMetrics business since July 2005. Mr. Mina was one of our founding members at the time of our spin-off from JPMorgan and served as our head of research from 2003 to 2005, where he was responsible for analytics across RiskMetrics' products and services. Prior to our spin-off, he worked in Risk Management Services at JPMorgan. Mr. Mina has an M.S. from the University of Chicago and a B.S. from the Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México.
97
Gregg Berman. Gregg E. Berman has served as co-head of our RiskMetrics business since 2007. In 2006, Mr. Berman served as our head of strategic development. Mr. Berman was one of our founding members at the time of our spin-off from JPMorgan in 1998 and has served a number of roles, including product manager from 1999 to 2000, head of market risk from 2000 to 2004 and head of sales in 2005. Mr. Berman is a physicist by training and holds a Ph.D. and an M.S. from Princeton University and a B.S. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Directors
Peter Bernard. Peter Bernard has served as one of our directors since January 2000. Mr. Bernard served in a variety of executive roles at our company between January 2000 and January 2004, including service as our chief financial officer from January 2002 to June 2003. Mr. Bernard currently serves as a managing director at D.E. Shaw & Co., an investment and technology development firm, a position he has held since October 2006. From February 2005 to December 2005, he served as chief operating officer for Alpha Simplex Group, an investment management company. For the six years prior to his joining us, he was the co-founder and President of New Bond Trading, a Boston-based investment management firm. Mr. Bernard holds a B.A. from Bowdoin College. Mr. Bernard will resign shortly after we consummate our initial public offering.
Philip Duff. Phillip Duff has served as one of our directors since 2001. Mr. Duff has served as chairman and chief executive officer of Robson Ventures, LLC since January 2007. From January 2000 to 2006, he served as chairman and chief executive officer of FrontPoint Partners LLC, an investment management firm which he founded. Previous to that, Mr. Duff was the chief financial officer of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. Mr. Duff is currently a director of Ambac Financial Group, Inc. Mr. Duff holds a B.A. from Harvard University and an M.B.A. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Rene Kern. Rene Kern has served as one of our directors since June 2004. Mr. Kern is a managing director of General Atlantic LLC, a global growth equity firm that provides capital and strategic support for growth companies and has been with General Atlantic LLC since 1996. Mr. Kern is currently a director of Intec Telecoms Systems plc, a provider of business and operations support systems, and iSOFT Group plc, a supplier of healthcare software solutions. He has a B.S. from the University of California, Berkeley and both an M.B.A. and M.A. from the University of Pennsylvania.
Arthur Levitt. Arthur Levitt has served as one of our directors since April 2005. Mr. Levitt currently serves as a senior advisor to The Carlyle Group. Mr. Levitt served as the chairman of the SEC from 1993 to 2001. Prior to joining the SEC, Mr. Levitt owned Roll Call, the newspaper of Capitol Hill. From 1989 to 1993 he served as chairman of the NYC Economic Development Corporation and from 1978 to 1989 was chairman of the American Stock Exchange. Mr. Levitt is currently an advisory director of M&T Bank Corporation, a regional bank headquartered in western New York. He served two years in the United States Air Force and holds a B.A. degree from Williams College.
Christopher Mitchell. Christopher Mitchell has served as one of our directors since 2006. He is a managing director of Spectrum Equity Investors, L.P., a private equity firm that invests primarily in the information services, media, and communications industries and has held that position since December 2005. From 2001 to December 2005, Mr. Mitchell served as a principal at Spectrum Equity Investors, L.P. Mr. Mitchell has a B.A. from Princeton University.
Stephen Thieke. Stephen Thieke served as chairman of our board of directors from our inception in 1998 until June 2004 and was re-elected to serve as one of our directors in April 2007. From August 1989 to July 1999, Mr. Thieke worked for JPMorgan in a variety of senior management positions, including head of fixed income, business co-head of global markets, president and chairman
98
of JPMorgan Securities, Inc. and head of the corporate risk management group. Mr. Thieke served on the board of directors of the Financial Services Authority. Mr. Thieke is a member of the board of directors of PNC Financial Services Group Inc. Mr. Thieke holds a B.A. degree from Manhattan College.
Robert Trudeau. Robert Trudeau has served as one of our directors since September 2005. Mr. Trudeau is currently a general partner at Technology Crossover Ventures, a private equity and venture capital firm focused on information technology companies and has served as such since August 2005. From 2003 to 2005, he was a principal at General Atlantic Partners. Prior to General Atlantic, Mr. Trudeau served as a managing director at iFormation Group, a joint venture between General Atlantic, Goldman Sachs and Boston Consulting Group. He has a B.A.H. in Political Science from Queen's University and an M.B.A. from The University of Western Ontario.
Committees of the Board of Directors
Our board of directors currently consists of eight directors who have been nominated and elected pursuant to our Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement. Five of these directors qualify as "independent" according to the rules and regulations of the SEC and the .
Our board of directors has established an audit committee, a compensation and human resources committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee. The composition, duties and responsibilities of these committees are set forth below. Our committee members hold office for a term of one year.
As part of our evolution from being a privately-held company to a public one, we plan to add additional independent directors to our board of directors and change the composition of the committees of our board as those new members join to ensure that all members of all board committees are independent. Our nominating and corporate governance committee is currently engaged in an effort to identify and screen qualified director candidates. Within the next year, we intend to add up to four new independent directors. In addition, Peter Bernard will resign from our board shortly after we consummate our initial public offering.
Audit Committee. The current members of our audit committee are Messrs. , and . Mr. is our audit committee chair and is also our audit committee financial expert under the SEC rules implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Our audit committee's primary responsibilities, among others, include:
Compensation and Human Resources Committee. The current members of our compensation and human resources committee are Messrs. , , and , of which Messrs. and are deemed "independent" as defined under rules. Mr. is currently our compensation
99
and human resources committee chair. Our compensation and human resources committee's primary responsibilities, among others, include:
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The current members of our nominating and corporate governance committee are Messrs. , and , of which Messrs. and are "independent" as defined under applicable rules. Mr. is currently our nominating and corporate governance committee chair. Our nominating and corporate governance committee's primary responsibilities, among others, include:
100
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2006, none of our executive officers served, currently none of them serves and we anticipate that none will serve in the future, on the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity with executive officers who have served or will serve on our board of directors or Compensation and Human Resources Committee.
Director Compensation
Upon the consummation of this offering, our non-employee directors will receive an annual retainer fee of $40,000 in cash and 5,000 restricted shares of our common stock. We will issue to our lead independent director an additional 1,500 restricted shares of our common stock annually as compensation for service in that role. We will also pay our directors who serve on committees an additional cash stipend of $5,000 for the additional time required by committee service. The chairpersons of these committees will each receive $10,000 instead of $5,000. The restricted shares of our common stock granted to our non-employee directors will vest over a three year period, at a rate of one-third each year. Finally, we also reimburse our non-employee directors for any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses they may incur in connection with their service. We will review director compensation on an annual basis as market conditions and our share price fluctuate.
101
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Our compensation and human resources committee, or the committee, is empowered to review, approve and recommend for the approval of our board of directors, the annual compensation and compensation procedures for our chief executive officer. The committee also works with our chief executive officer on setting the compensation of our other executive officers.
Objectives of Compensation Program
We recognize that our employees are a critical asset and provide an important competitive advantage. Consequently, a key objective of our compensation program, including our executive compensation program, is to attract and retain qualified, talented and diverse professionals who are enthusiastic about our mission and culture. The most important part of compensation is providing our employees, including our executive officers, with a work environment, challenges, opportunities, clients and colleagues that are compelling. This is consistent with our overall corporate objective of becoming one of the world's most attractive employers, and the committee is committed to working to provide these opportunities to all employees. To that end, we intend to implement a progressive compensation program for our employees, including our executive officers, with a key objective being to provide fair and appropriate incentives and to reward our employees for their contribution to our business.
Compensation Guidelines
The Committee uses a number of guidelines in setting our chief executive officer's compensation and that of other executives, including the following:
102
appropriate risk profile for our company. This ratio may change from time to time as our circumstances and our risk profile change;
Equity Compensation
We provide our employees with equity compensation because we believe this closely aligns the incentives of our employees with our stockholders and is consistent with one of our key success factors, "ownership."
Each of our executive officers has received stock option grants under our stock option plans and all of our full-time employees are eligible for equity grants. Upon completion of our initial public offering we intend to provide a grant to each of our full-time employees of an option to acquire 500 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price equal to the initial public offering price. Approximately 80% of the stock options currently outstanding have been granted to employees who are not executive officers.
103
Summary Compensation Table for the year ended December 31, 2006
The following table provides information regarding the compensation of our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and each of the next two most highly compensation executive officers in the year ended December 31, 2006. We refer to these officers as our named executive officers.
Name and Principal Position |
Salary ($) (1) |
Bonus ($) (2) |
Stock Awards ($) (3) |
Option Awards ($) (4) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (5) |
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) (6) |
All Other Compensation ($) (7) |
Total ($) (8) |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M. Ethan Berman, Chief Executive Officer |
||||||||||||||||
David Obstler, Chief Financial Officer |
||||||||||||||||
Jorge Mina, Co-Head of RiskMetrics Business |
||||||||||||||||
Gregg Berman, Co-Head of RiskMetrics Business |
Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for the year ended December 31, 2006
The following table provides information regarding grants of plan-based awards to our named executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) |
|
|
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non- Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) |
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) |
|
||||||||||||||||
Name |
Grant Date |
Threshold ($) |
Target ($) |
Maximum ($) |
Threshold (#) |
Target (#) |
Maximum ($) |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards |
||||||||||||||
M. Ethan Berman, Chief Executive Officer |
||||||||||||||||||||||
David Obstler, Chief Financial Officer |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Jorge Mina, Co-Head of RiskMetrics Business |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Gregg Berman, Co-Head of RiskMetrics Business |
104
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End for the year ended December 31, 2006
The following table provides information regarding equity awards granted to our named executive officers that were outstanding as of December 31, 2006:
Name |
Option Awards Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) (Unexercisable) |
Option Exercise Price ($) |
Option Expiration Date |
Stock Awards Number of Shares or Stock That Have not Vested (#) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M. Ethan Berman, Chief Executive Officer |
||||||||||||||||||
David Obstler, Chief Financial Officer |
||||||||||||||||||
Jorge Mina, Co-Head of RiskMetrics Business |
||||||||||||||||||
Gregg Berman, Co-Head of RiskMetrics Business |
Option Exercises and Stock Vested for the year ended December 31, 2006
The following table provides information regarding options that were exercised and restricted stock that vested during the year ended December 31, 2006:
|
Option Awards |
Stock Awards |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name |
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) |
Value Realized on Exercise ($) |
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) |
Value Realized on Vesting ($) |
||||
M. Ethan Berman, Chief Executive Officer |
||||||||
David Obstler, Chief Financial Officer |
||||||||
Jorge Mina, Co-Head of RiskMetrics Business |
||||||||
Gregg Berman, Co-Head of RiskMetrics Business |
105
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
The following table provides information regarding each of our defined contribution or other plans that provide for the deferral of compensation of our named executive officers on a basis that is not qualified:
Name |
Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) |
Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) |
Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($) |
Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) |
Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M. Ethan Berman, Chief Executive Officer |
||||||||||
David Obstler, Chief Financial Officer |
||||||||||
Jorge Mina, Co-Head of RiskMetrics Business |
||||||||||
Gregg Berman, Co-Head of RiskMetrics Business |
Director Compensation
The following table provides information regarding the compensation of our directors in the year ended December 31, 2006:
Name |
Fee Earned or Paid in Cash ($) (1) |
Stock Awards ($) (2) |
Option Awards ($) (3) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (4) |
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings (5) |
All Other Compensation ($) (6) |
Total ($) (7) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M. Ethan Berman | ||||||||||||||
Peter Bernard | ||||||||||||||
Philip Duff | ||||||||||||||
Rene Kern | ||||||||||||||
Arthur Levitt | ||||||||||||||
Christopher Mitchell | ||||||||||||||
Stephen Thieke | ||||||||||||||
Robert Trudeau |
106
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABILITY
Corporate Governance
Corporate governance is the system by which companies are overseen and managed. These practices and structures revolve around fairness, transparency and accountability. We believe that strong governance structures will help to maximize shareholder value over the long-term by providing the appropriate level of accountability and oversight.
To that end, we have adopted a progressive set of Governance Principles and Board Guidelines which we believe are appropriate and in the best interest of our company and our stockholders. These guidelines will become effective at the time we complete our initial public offering and they will be posted on our website.
Some of the key elements of our principles will be:
107
Our Governance Principles and Board Guidelines and committee charters are reviewed periodically and updated as necessary to reflect changes in regulatory requirements and evolving oversight practices.
Sustainability
Our board of directors believes that social responsibility and the common good of the communities we serve align with building long-term shareholder value. Our board of directors expects that management will remain cognizant of issues involving equal employment opportunities, open channels of communication for employees, clients and suppliers, effective employee training and development, and other questions bearing on our social responsibility.
We are committed to operating in a way that retains the trust of our employees, clients, investors and communities and minimizes harm to the environment. Our board of directors has designated Philip Duff, one of our directors, to chair and oversee our sustainability efforts. Mr. Duff, along with a team of our employees, will set sustainability goals and measure our progress against them, paying particular attention to suggestions by a voluntary employee Sustainability Task Force in such areas as environmental impact, community involvement and employee programs.
108
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Registration Rights
The holders of 41,492,641 shares of our common stock are entitled to rights with respect to the registration of their shares under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Specifically, the holders of 32,531,466 shares are entitled to demand registration rights, and the holders of 41,492,641 shares are entitled to piggyback registration rights and S-3 registration rights. These registration rights are contained in our Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement and are described below. We refer to these holders as "entitled stockholders."
Demand Registration Rights. At any time after 180 days following the completion of this offering, the entitled stockholders have the right to require that we register their common stock, provided such registration relates to not less than 50% in the aggregate of our then outstanding shares of common stock having demand registration rights. We are only obligated to effect three registrations in response to these demand registration rights. The underwriters of any underwritten offering have the right to limit the number of shares to be included in a registration statement filed in response to the exercise of these demand registration rights.
Piggyback Registration Rights. If we register any securities for public sale, the entitled stockholders have the right to include their shares in the registration, subject to specified exemptions. The underwriters of any underwritten offering of shares of our common stock will be permitted to reduce the number of shares to be included in the registration statement for marketing reasons.
S-3 Registration Rights. If we are eligible to file a registration statement on Form S-3, the entitled stockholders may request that we register their shares, provided that the total price of the shares of common stock offered to the public is at least $5,000,000. We are not obliged to effect more than two such registrations in any 12-month period.
We may defer the filing of any registration statement for up to 120 days once in any 12-month period if we determine that the filing would adversely affect our business activities, including a registered public offering. We have also agreed to indemnify and hold harmless each entitled stockholder under certain circumstances against certain liabilities in connection with their registration rights granted under the Amended and Restated Investors Rights Agreement, including liabilities under the Securities Act, as amended. All expenses incurred in connection with these registrations will be payable by us.
Upon the closing of this offering, the Amended and Restated Investors Rights Agreement, other than with respect to the registration rights, terminates.
Right to Appoint Board and Committee Members
Our current board of directors consists of eight directors, each of whom were appointed by certain of our stockholders pursuant to the terms of the Amended and Restated Investors Rights Agreement discussed above.
109
All rights to make a binding nomination for the appointment of directors will terminate upon the closing of this offering, although currently-serving directors that were appointed prior to this offering will continue to serve pursuant to their appointment until the term of those directors will expire. We are not a party to, and are not aware of, any voting agreements among our stockholders that will be in effect after the offering is completed.
Indemnification of Directors
We have entered in to indemnification agreements with each of our directors, pursuant to which we have agreed to indemnify such director against all expenses and liabilities incurred or paid by the director (i) if he was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any pending or threatened claim, action or proceeding (other than an action by or in the right of the company) by reason of his service as a director of our company and (ii) to the extent permitted by applicable law if the director is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any pending or threatened claim, action proceeding by or in the right of the company to procure a judgment in our favor by reason of the director's service as a director of our company; provided that no indemnification shall be available if (i) the director failed to act in good faith and in a manner the director reasonably believed to be in our best interests, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, he had reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful or (ii) it has been adjudicated finally by a court of competent jurisdiction that, in connection with any pending or threatened claim, action or proceeding out of which the claim for indemnification has arisen, the director failed to act in good faith and in a manner the director reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to our best interests.
Consulting Agreement
In December 2004, we entered into a consulting agreement with one of our directors, Arthur Levitt. The consulting agreement provided that Mr. Levitt would provide certain strategic advice and marketing assistance to us in consideration for an annual payment of $125,000. Mr. Levitt was paid $125,000 for 2005, and accepted options to purchase 31,250 and 18,750 shares at exercise prices per share of $7.20 and $15.29, respectively, in lieu of payment, for 2006 and 2007, respectively. We do not expect this agreement to be renewed for 2008.
Share Repurchases
In June 2004, in connection with a private placement, we repurchased approximately 4,650,000 shares of junior convertible preferred stock, 1,700,000 shares of common stock and 234,840 options to shares of common stock from certain of our employees, directors and stockholders for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $24 million. Pursuant to the share repurchase, we purchased shares and options from certain of our directors and executive officers. Peter Bernard, Philip Duff, and Stephen Thieke, each of whom was one of our directors at the time, were paid $ , $ , and $ , respectively. Gregg Berman and Jorge Mina, each of whom is one of our executive officers, were paid $ , and $ , respectively. In addition, we repurchased shares of junior convertible preferred stock from Mr. Bernard, Mr. Thieke and M. Ethan Berman, who is a director and executive officer, for which they were paid $ , $ and $ , respectively.
Customer Agreements
From 2004 to 2006, we sold products and services to FrontPoint Partners LLC, an entity founded by one of our directors, Philip Duff. In the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, the revenues recognized from these sales were $149,000, $230,000 and $266,000, respectively. In December 2006, Mr. Duff sold his interests in FrontPoint Partners LLC.
During 2004, we provided products and services in the normal course of business to certain customers who were also our stockholders. During the period from January 1, 2004 to June 14, 2004, we recognized $8.1 million of revenues from such contracts. As of June 14, 2004, these customers ceased to be our stockholders as a result of a private placement and repurchase.
110
PRINCIPAL AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth the total number and percentage of our common stock beneficially owned both immediately before and immediately following the closing of this offering by:
Except as otherwise noted below, the address of each of the persons in the table is c/o RiskMetrics Group, Inc., One Chase Manhattan Plaza, 44th Floor, New York, New York 10005.
|
|
|
Shares Being Sold in Offering |
Shares Beneficially Owned Following Offering |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Assuming Underwriters Over- Allotment Option is Not Exercised |
|
Assuming Underwriters Over-Allotment Option is Not Exercised |
Assuming Underwriters Over Allotment Option is Exercised |
|||||||||||
|
Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to Offering |
Assuming Underwriters Over Allotment Option is Exercised |
|||||||||||||||
Beneficial Owner |
|||||||||||||||||
Number |
Percentage(a) |
Number |
Percentage |
Number |
Percentage |
||||||||||||
Entities affiliated with General Atlantic LLC(1) | 13,333,332 | 28.00 | % | ||||||||||||||
Entities affiliated with Spectrum Equity Investors IV, L.P.(2) | 13,333,332 | 28.00 | % | ||||||||||||||
Entities affiliated with TCV V, L.P.(3) | 5,864,802 | 12.32 | % | ||||||||||||||
M. Ethan Berman(4) | 7,531,250 | 15.33 | % | ||||||||||||||
Peter Bernard(5) | 697,917 | 1.46 | % | ||||||||||||||
Philip Duff(6) | 83,334 | * | |||||||||||||||
Rene Kern(1) | 13,333,332 | 28.00 | % | ||||||||||||||
Arthur Levitt(7) | 60,418 | * | |||||||||||||||
Christopher Mitchell(2) | 13,333,332 | 28.00 | % | ||||||||||||||
Stephen Thieke | — | * | |||||||||||||||
Robert Trudeau | — | * | |||||||||||||||
David Obstler(8) | 234,337 | * | |||||||||||||||
Jorge Mina(9) | 142,660 | * | |||||||||||||||
Gregg Berman(10) | 267,502 | * | |||||||||||||||
All directors and named executive officers as a group (11 persons) | 35,684,082 | 71.43 | % |
111
GmbH. The Managing Directors of General Atlantic LLC make the voting and investment decisions with respect to GAPCO Management GmbH and GAPCO GmbH & Co. KG. Rene Kern is a Managing Director of General Atlantic LLC and a Managing Member of GAP Coinvestments III, LLC and GAP Coinvestments IV, LLC. Mr. Kern disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of his individual pecuniary interest therein. The address for the General Atlantic entities, other than GAPCO GmbH & Co. KG and GAPCO Management GmbH, is c/o General Atlantic Service Company, LLC, Three Pickwick Plaza, Suite 200, Greenwich, Connecticut 06830. The address for GAPCO GmbH & Co. KG and GAPCO Management GmbH is Koenigsallee 62, 40212 Duesseldorf, Germany.
112
Set forth below is a summary of the terms of our capital stock. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and by-laws and to the applicable provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law.
Our authorized capital stock currently consists of 150,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share. In connection with this offering, we expect to file our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation so that, among other things, our authorized capital stock shall consist of 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share.
Common Stock
Each shareholder is entitled to cast one vote for each share of our common stock held. Dividends may be declared by the board of directors. We do not expect to pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of shares of our common stock would be entitled to receive all remaining assets of the company, distributed ratably on the basis of the number of shares of common stock held by each of them. The holders of our common stock have no preemptive or other subscription rights to purchase shares of our capital stock. All of the outstanding shares of our common stock are, and the shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options will be, when issued, fully paid and nonassessable.
As of June 30, 2007, 46,487,549 shares of our common stock were outstanding, exclusive of existing options and the shares to be issued in this offering. On May 1, 2007, we effected a 2.5 to 1 stock split. Except where indicated otherwise, all share numbers included in this prospectus have been adjusted to reflect this stock split.
Preferred Stock
Upon the filing of our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, we will be authorized to issue up to 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Our board of directors will be authorized, subject to the limitations prescribed by Delaware law and our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, to determine the terms and conditions of the preferred stock, including whether the shares of preferred stock will be issued in one or more series, the number of shares to be issued in each series and the rights, preferences and priorities of such shares; provided, however, that such preferred stock shall not be issued for anti-takeover purposes and shall not have super-majority voting rights. We have no current plan to issue any shares of preferred stock following the consummation of this offering.
Limitation of Liability and Indemnification of Directors and Authorized Representatives
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law provides that a corporation may indemnify directors and officers, as well as other employees and individuals, against expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by any such person in connection with any threatened, pending or completed actions, suits or proceedings in which such person is made a party by reason of such person being or having been a director, officer, employee or agent to the corporation. The Delaware General Corporation Law provides that Section 145 is not exclusive of other rights to which those seeking indemnification may be entitled under any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise.
Our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides for indemnification and advancement of expenses to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law to any person who was or is
113
a party to, or was or is threatened to be made a party to, or is otherwise involved in, any action, suit or proceeding by reason of the fact that such person was or is our authorized representative, or our director, officer, employee or agent, or was or is serving at our request as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, non-profit entity or other enterprise, against all liability and loss suffered and expenses, including attorney's fees, actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such proceeding.
Our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation further provides that our directors will not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) for unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases, redemptions or other distributions, or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
Indemnification Agreements
We have entered into indemnification agreements with certain of our directors which may, in certain cases, be broader than the specific indemnification provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation and by-laws. The indemnification agreements may require us, among other things, to indemnify such directors against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors, officers or employees of the company and to advance the expenses incurred by such parties as a result of any threatened claims or proceedings brought against them as to which they could be indemnified.
Delaware Anti-Takeover Statute
Our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, an anti-takeover law, will not apply to us. In general, Section 203 prohibits a publicly-held Delaware corporation from engaging under certain circumstances, in a business combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three years following the date the person became an interested stockholder.
Transfer Agent
The transfer agent for our common stock is .
Listing
We intend to apply to have our shares of common stock listed on the under the symbol .
114
DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN INDEBTEDNESS
General
In connection with our acquisition of ISS on January 11, 2007, we and our subsidiary, RiskMetrics Group Holdings, LLC, as borrower, entered into (i) first lien credit facilities consisting of a six year $25 million revolving credit facility and a seven year $300 million term loan facility and (ii) a seven and a half year $125 million second lien term loan facility. Bank of America, N.A. acted as administrative agent for the credit facilities. Banc of America Securities LLC and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC acted as joint lead arrangers for the credit facilities. The key terms of the credit facilities are described below. This description is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the related credit agreements and security agreements, copies of which have been filed as exhibits to this registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part.
Amortization and Prepayment
The first lien term loan facility provides for quarterly amortization payments totaling 1% of the original principal amount per annum, with the balance payable on the maturity date. The first lien revolving credit facility is not subject to amortization. The second lien term loan facility is not subject to amortization.
The credit facilities are subject to mandatory prepayment, generally, with (i) the excess (if any) of 50% of excess cash flow (with step-downs based upon our consolidated leverage ratio), (ii) 100% of net cash proceeds from certain permitted dispositions of property, subject to a 15 month reinvestment period and certain other exceptions, (iii) 100% of net cash proceeds from incurrence or issuance of certain debt, and (iv) 100% of net cash proceeds from certain insurance proceeds or condemnation awards, subject to a 15 month reinvestment period and certain other exceptions. The first lien credit facilities also permit optional prepayments without premium or penalty. The second lien term loan facility permits optional prepayments subject to prepayment premium of (i) if such prepayment is made during the first year of the credit facilities (A) with the proceeds of an IPO, 1% of the principal amount prepaid or (B) otherwise, 2% of the principal amount prepaid or (ii) if such prepayment is made during the second year of the facilities, 1% of the principal amount prepaid.
Interest
The interest rate with respect to the revolving credit facility is based on, at our option, (a) the LIBOR rate plus a margin of 1.75% to 2.25% based on our consolidated leverage ratio, or (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% and (ii) Bank of America's "prime rate," plus a margin of 0.75% or 1.25% based on our consolidated leverage ratio.
The interest rate with respect to the first lien term loan facility is based on, at our option, (a) the LIBOR rate plus a margin of 2.00% to 2.25% based on our consolidated leverage ratio, or (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% and (ii) Bank of America's "prime rate," plus a margin of 0.75% or 1.25% based on our consolidated leverage ratio.
The interest with respect to the second lien term loan facility is based on, at our option, (a) the LIBOR rate plus a margin of 5.50%, or (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Rate plus 5.0% and (ii) Bank of America's "prime rate," plus a margin of 4.50%.
Guarantees and Security
All amounts owed under the credit facilities are guaranteed by us and each of the existing and future direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiary of RiskMetrics Group Holdings, LLC,
115
including RiskMetrics and ISS, collectively referred to as the "Guarantors," subject to certain agreed upon exceptions.
The first lien term loan facility and the revolving credit facility are secured by a first-priority perfected security interest in (i) substantially all the tangible and intangible assets of the Guarantors, with certain agreed upon limitations, (ii) the capital stock of the existing and future subsidiaries of the Guarantors, provided that the pledge of the capital stock of non-U.S. subsidiaries shall be limited to 65% of the stock of the Guarantors' non-U.S. subsidiaries, (iii) all present and future inter-company debt of the Guarantors and (iv) all proceeds and products of the property and assets described above. The second lien term loan facility is secured by a second-priority security interest in all the assets pledged to the first lien term loan facility and the revolving credit facility, as described above.
The indebtedness was obtained by our wholly-owned subsidiary. We, as parent holding company, have no independent assets or operations, and any other subsidiaries, other than the borrower and its subsidiaries, are minor. We have guaranteed the indebtedness and such guarantee is full and unconditional. In addition, there are no restrictions on our ability to obtain funds from our subsidiaries by dividend or loan.
Covenants
The credit facilities contain a number of covenants that, among other things, include customary limitations (which are subject to certain exceptions) on the ability of RiskMetrics Group Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries to:
In addition, RiskMetrics Group Holdings LLC and its subsidiaries are required to comply with certain financial ratios and tests, including a maximum consolidated leverage ratio and maximum capital expenditures.
Events of Default
The credit facilities contain customary events of default, including, among others, non-payment, breach of covenants, other defaults, misrepresentations, cross-defaults, insolvency proceedings, bankruptcy, judgments, ERISA events, invalidity of loan documents, change of control and cessation of perfected liens.
116
CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following is a general discussion of certain U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our common stock as of the date hereof that may be relevant to you if you are a non-U.S. Holder.
As used in this discussion, the term "non-U.S. Holder" means any person that is not, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, any of the following:
This discussion is based on the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the "Code"), and regulations, rulings, and judicial decisions as of the date hereof. Those authorities may be changed, possibly with retroactive effect, or different interpretations. This discussion is limited to non-U.S. Holders who hold shares of our common stock as capital assets. Moreover, this discussion is for general information only and does not address all the U.S. federal income tax consequences and does not address foreign, state, local or other tax considerations that may be relevant to you in light of your personal circumstances, nor does it discuss special tax provisions that may apply to you if you relinquished U.S. citizenship or residence. In addition, it does not represent a detailed description of the U.S. federal income tax consequences to you if you are subject to special treatment under the U.S. federal income tax laws (including, for example, if you are an expatriate, "controlled foreign corporation," "passive foreign investment company," financial institution, insurance company, tax-exempt organization or a partnership or other pass-through entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes). If you are a partnership holding our common stock, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner in a partnership holding our common stock, you should consult your tax advisor.
EACH PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS ADVISED TO CONSULT A TAX ADVISOR REGARDING THE U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND FOREIGN INCOME, ESTATE AND OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES OF PURCHASING, OWNING AND DISPOSING OF OUR COMMON STOCK.
Dividends
If dividends are paid on our common stock, as a non-U.S. Holder, you will generally be subject to withholding of U.S. federal income tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty. To claim the benefit of a lower rate under an income tax treaty, you must properly file with the payor an Internal Revenue Service Form W-8BEN, or successor form, certifying under penalty of perjury that you are not a United States person (as defined under the Code) and claiming an exemption from or reduction in withholding under the applicable tax treaty. Special certification and other requirements apply to you if you are pass-through entity rather than a corporation or individual or if our common stock is held through certain foreign intermediaries.
117
If dividends are considered effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business by you within the United States and, where a tax treaty applies, are attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment of yours, those dividends will not be subject to withholding tax, but instead will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net basis at applicable graduated individual or corporate rates as if you were a United States person (as defined under the Code), unless an applicable income tax treaty provides otherwise, provided an Internal Revenue Service Form W-8ECI, or successor form, is filed with the payor. In addition, if you are required to provide an Internal Revenue Service Form W-8ECI or successor form, as discussed above, you must also provide your tax identification number. If you are a foreign corporation, any effectively connected dividends may, under certain circumstances, be subject to an additional "branch profits tax" at a rate of 30% or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.
If you are eligible for a reduced rate of U.S. withholding tax pursuant to an income tax treaty, you may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld by filing an appropriate claim for refund with the Internal Revenue Service.
Gain on Disposition of Common Stock
As a non-U.S. Holder, you generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any gain recognized on the sale or other disposition of our common stock unless:
Federal Estate Tax
If you are an individual, our common stock held at the time of your death will be included in your gross estate for U.S. federal estate tax purposes and may be subject to U.S. federal estate tax, unless an applicable estate tax treaty provides otherwise.
Current U.S. federal tax law provides for reductions in U.S. federal estate tax through 2009 and the elimination of such estate tax entirely in 2010. Under this law, such estate tax would be fully reinstated, as in effect prior to the reductions, in 2011, unless further legislation is enacted.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding Tax
We must report annually to the Internal Revenue Service and to each of you the amount of dividends paid to you and the tax withheld with respect to those dividends, regardless of whether withholding was required. Copies of the information returns reporting those dividends and withholding
118
may also be made available by the Internal Revenue Service to the tax authorities in the country in which you reside under the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty or other applicable agreements.
Backup withholding tax may also apply to dividend payments made to you on or with respect to our common stock unless you certify under penalty of perjury that you are a non-U.S. Holder (and we do not have actual knowledge or reason to know that you are a United States person (as defined under the Code)) or you otherwise establish an exemption.
Information reporting and, depending on the circumstances, backup withholding will apply to the proceeds of a sale of our common stock within the United States or conducted through United States-related financial intermediaries unless the beneficial owner certifies under penalty of perjury that it is a non-U.S. Holder (and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the beneficial owner is a United States person (as defined under the Code)) or the holder otherwise establishes an exemption.
Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules generally will be allowed as a refund or a credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability provided that the required procedures are followed.
You should consult your tax advisor regarding the application of the information reporting and backup withholding rules to you.
119
We, the selling stockholders and the underwriters named below have entered into an underwriting agreement with respect to the shares being offered. Subject to certain conditions, each underwriter has severally agreed to purchase the number of shares indicated in the following table. are the representatives of the underwriters.
Underwriter |
Number of shares |
||
---|---|---|---|
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC | |||
Goldman, Sachs & Co. | |||
Banc of America Securities LLC | |||
Total | |||
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters are obligated to purchase all the shares of common stock in the offering if any are purchased, other than those shares covered by the option described below. The underwriting agreement also provides that if an underwriter defaults, the purchase commitments of non-defaulting underwriters may be increased or the offering may be terminated.
We and the selling stockholders have granted to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase on a pro rata basis up to additional shares from us and an aggregate of up to additional outstanding shares from the selling stockholders at the initial public offering price less the underwriting discounts and commissions.
The following tables show the per share and total underwriting discounts and commissions to be paid to the underwriters by us and the selling stockholders. Such amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters' option to purchase additional shares.
|
No Exercise |
Full Exercise |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Per Share | $ | $ | ||||
Total | $ | $ |
Paid by the Selling Stockholders
|
No Exercise |
Full Exercise |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Per Share | $ | $ | ||||
Total | $ | $ |
Shares sold by the underwriters to the public will initially be offered at the initial public offering price set forth on the cover of this prospectus. Any shares sold by the underwriters to securities dealers may be sold at a discount of up to $ per share from the initial public offering price. If all the shares are not sold at the initial public offering price, the representatives may change the offering price and the other selling terms. The offering of the shares by the underwriters is subject to receipt and acceptance and subject to the underwriters' right to reject any order in whole or in part.
We and our officers, directors and holders of substantially all of our common stock, including the selling stockholders, have agreed with the underwriters, subject to certain exceptions, not to dispose of or hedge any of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of common stock during the period from the date of this prospectus continuing through the date days after the date of this prospectus, except with the prior written consent of the representatives. This agreement
120
does not apply to any existing employee benefit plans. See "Shares Eligible for Future Sale" for a discussion of certain transfer restrictions.
The -day restricted period described in the preceding paragraph will be automatically extended if: (1) during the last 17 days of the -day restricted period we issue an earnings release or announce material news or a material event; or (2) prior to the expiration of the -day restricted period, we announce that we will release earnings results during the 16-day period following the last day of the -day period, in which case the restrictions described in the preceding paragraph will continue to apply until the expiration of the 18-day period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release of the announcement of the material news or material event.
Prior to the offering, there has been no public market for the shares. The initial public offering price has been negotiated among us and the representatives. Among the factors to be considered in determining the initial public offering price of the shares, in addition to prevailing market conditions, will be our historical performance, estimates of our business potential and earnings prospects, an assessment of our management and the consideration of the above factors in relation to market valuation of companies in related businesses.
We intend to apply to list the common stock on the under the symbol " ."
In connection with the offering, the underwriters may purchase and sell shares of common stock in the open market. These transactions may include short sales, stabilizing transactions and purchases to cover positions created by short sales. Shorts sales involve the sale by the underwriters of a greater number of shares than they are required to purchase in the offering. "Covered" short sales are sales made in an amount not greater than the underwriters' option to purchase additional shares from the company and selling stockholders in the offering. The underwriters may close out any covered short position by either exercising their option to purchase additional shares or purchasing shares in the open market. In determining the source of shares to close out the covered short position, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as compared to the price at which they may purchase additional shares pursuant to the option granted to them. "Naked" short sales are any sales in excess of such option. The underwriters must close out any naked short position by purchasing shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of the common stock in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in the offering. Stabilizing transactions consist of various bids for or purchases of common stock made by the underwriters in the open market prior to the completion of the offering.
The underwriters may also impose a penalty bid. This occurs when a particular underwriter repays to the underwriters a portion of the underwriting discount received by it because the representatives have repurchased shares sold by or for the account of such underwriter in stabilizing or short covering transactions.
Purchases to cover a short position and stabilizing transactions, as well as other purchases by the underwriters for their own accounts, may have the effect of preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of the company's stock, and together with the imposition of the penalty bid, may stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the market price of the common stock. As a result, the price of the common stock may be higher than the price that otherwise might exist in the open market. If these activities are commenced, they may be discontinued at any time. These transactions may be effected on , in the over-the-counter market or otherwise.
Certain of the underwriters and their affiliates have provided in the past to us and may provide from time to time in the future certain commercial banking, financial advisory, investment banking and other services for us in the ordinary course of business, for which they have received and may continue to receive customary fees and commissions. In particular, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC or one of
121
its affiliates acted as ISS' financial advisor with respect to its acquisition by us and was paid a fee of $6.4 million, plus $0.3 million in expenses, in connection therewith. Furthermore, in connection with our acquisition of ISS on January 11, 2007, we and our subsidiary, RiskMetrics Group Holdings, LLC, as borrower, entered into (i) first lien credit facilities consisting of a $25 million revolving credit facility and a $300 million term loan facility and (ii) a $125 million second lien term loan facility. Affiliates of Banc of America Securities LLC and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC are lenders under those credit facilities, and accordingly will receive part of the proceeds which we intend to use to repay a portion of our outstanding indebtedness under those credit facilities. See "Description of Certain Indebtedness" and "Use of Proceeds."
Since Banc of America Securities LLC and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC are each an underwriter and may receive more than 10% of the entire net proceeds in this offering, the underwriters may be deemed to have a "conflict of interest" under Rule 2710(h) of the Conduct Rules of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., or FINRA. Accordingly, this offering will be made in compliance with the applicable provisions of Rule 2720 of the conduct rules. Rule 2720 requires that the initial public offering price can be no higher than that recommended by a "qualified independent underwriter", as defined by FINRA. Goldman, Sachs & Co. has served in that capacity and performed due diligence investigations and reviewed and participated in the preparation of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. Goldman, Sachs & Co. has received $10,000 from us as compensation for such role.
The underwriters do not expect sales to discretionary accounts to exceed five percent of the total number of shares offered.
We and the selling stockholders estimate that our share of the total expenses of the offering, excluding underwriting discounts and commissions, will be approximately $ .
We and the selling stockholders have agreed to indemnify the several underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933.
At our request, the underwriters have reserved for sale, at the initial offering price, up to of the shares offered by this prospectus for sale to our directors and employees. If these persons purchase reserved shares, this will reduce the number of shares available to the general public. Any reserved shares that are not orally confirmed for purchase within one day of the pricing of this offering will be offered by the underwriters to the general public on the same terms as the other shares offered by this prospectus.
European Economic Area
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a Relevant Member State), each underwriter has represented and agreed that with effect from and including the date on which the Prospectus Directive is implemented in that Relevant Member State (the Relevant Implementation Date) it has not made and will not make an offer of shares to the public in that Relevant Member State prior to the publication of a prospectus in relation to the shares which has been approved by the competent authority in that Relevant Member State or, where appropriate, approved in another Relevant Member State and notified to the competent authority in that Relevant Member State, all in accordance with the Prospectus Directive, except that it may, with effect from and including the Relevant Implementation Date, make an offer of shares to the public in that Relevant Member State at any time:
122
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an "offer of shares to the public" in relation to any shares in any Relevant Member State means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the shares to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the shares, as the same may be varied in that Relevant Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Relevant Member State and the expression Prospectus Directive means Directive 2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing measure in each Relevant Member State.
Notice to Investors in the United Kingdom
Each underwriter has represented and agreed that:
Notice to Residents of Hong Kong
The shares may not be offered or sold by means of any document other than (i) in circumstances which do not constitute an offer to the public within the meaning of the Companies Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong), or (ii) to "professional investors" within the meaning of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571, Laws of Hong Kong) and any rules made thereunder, or (iii) in other circumstances which do not result in the document being a "prospectus" within the meaning of the Companies Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong), and no advertisement, invitation or document relating to the shares may be issued or may be in the possession of any person for the purpose of issue (in each case whether in Hong Kong or elsewhere), which is directed at, or the contents of which are likely to be accessed or read by, the public in Hong Kong (except if permitted to do so under the laws of Hong Kong) other than with respect to shares which are or are intended to be disposed of only to persons outside Hong Kong or only to "professional investors" within the meaning of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571, Laws of Hong Kong) and any rules made thereunder.
Notice to Residents of Singapore
This prospectus has not been registered as a prospectus with the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Accordingly, this prospectus and any other document or material in connection with the offer or sale, or invitation for subscription or purchase, of the shares may not be circulated or distributed, nor may the shares be offered or sold, or be made the subject of an invitation for subscription or purchase, whether directly or indirectly, to persons in Singapore other than (i) to an institutional investor under Section 274 of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore (the "SFA"), (ii) to a relevant
123
person, or any person pursuant to Section 275(1A), and in accordance with the conditions, specified in Section 275 of the SFA or (iii) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the conditions of, any other applicable provision of the SFA.
Where the shares are subscribed or purchased under Section 275 by a relevant person which is: (a) a corporation (which is not an accredited investor) the sole business of which is to hold investments and the entire share capital of which is owned by one or more individuals, each of whom is an accredited investor; or (b) a trust (where the trustee is not an accredited investor) whose sole purpose is to hold investments and each beneficiary is an accredited investor, shares, debentures and units of shares and debentures of that corporation or the beneficiaries' rights and interest in that trust shall not be transferable for 6 months after that corporation or that trust has acquired the shares under Section 275 except: (1) to an institutional investor under Section 274 of the SFA or to a relevant person, or any person pursuant to Section 275(1A), and in accordance with the conditions, specified in Section 275 of the SFA; (2) where no consideration is given for the transfer; or (3) by operation of law.
Notice to Residents of Japan
The securities have not been and will not be registered under the Securities and Exchange Law of Japan (the Securities and Exchange Law) and each underwriter has agreed that it will not offer or sell any securities, directly or indirectly, in Japan or to, or for the benefit of, any resident of Japan (which term as used herein means any person resident in Japan, including any corporation or other entity organized under the laws of Japan), or to others for re-offering or resale, directly or indirectly, in Japan or to a resident of Japan, except pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of, and otherwise in compliance with, the Securities and Exchange Law and any other applicable laws, regulations and ministerial guidelines of Japan.
124
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Prior to our initial public offering, there has been no public market for our stock. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that market sales of shares or the availability of shares for sale will have on the market price prevailing from time to time. Sales of our common stock in the public market after the restrictions lapse as described below, or the perception that those sales may occur, could cause the prevailing market price to decrease or to be lower than it might be in the absence of those sales or perceptions.
Sale of Restricted Shares
Upon completion of this public offering, we will have outstanding shares of common stock. The shares of common stock being sold in this offering will be freely tradable, other than by any of our "affiliates" as defined in Rule 144(a) under the Securities Act of 1933, without restriction or registration under the Securities Act of 1933. All remaining shares, and all shares subject to outstanding options, were issued and sold by us in private transactions and are eligible for public sale if registered under the Securities Act of 1933 or sold in accordance with Rule 144 or Rule 701 under the Securities Act of 1933. These remaining shares are "restricted securities" within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933.
As a result of the selling restriction agreements, the provisions of Rules 144, 144(k) and 701, the restricted securities will first become available for sale in the public market as follows (in all cases subject to the requirement that no unvested shares may be sold before they vest):
Days After the Date of this Prospectus |
Additional Shares Eligible for Public Sale |
Comments |
---|
Lock-Up Arrangements
Pursuant to the terms of a Second Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement, certain of our stockholders have agreed to limit the sales of shares of any of our common stock owned by them following this offering as follows: a stockholder who is an employee or member of our board of directors (i) may only sell up to 50% of his or her shares during the year after this offering and (ii) may only sell his or her shares commencing six months after the date of this offering if such stockholder holds in excess of one percent of the outstanding shares of our common stock (on a fully diluted basis). This lock-up arrangement is subject to certain exceptions for transfers of shares by the stockholder to family members.
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144, as currently in effect, a person who owns shares that were acquired from us or an affiliate of us at least one year prior to the proposed sale is entitled to sell upon expiration of the selling restrictions described above, within any three-month period beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus, a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of:
Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to certain manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about us. Rule 144 also provides that our affiliates
125
who sell shares of our common stock that are not restricted shares must nonetheless comply with the same restrictions applicable to restricted shares with the exception of the holding period requirement.
Rule 144(k)
Under Rule 144(k), a person who is not deemed to have been one of our affiliates for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933 at any time during the 90 days preceding a sale and who has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least two years, including the holding period of any prior owner other than our affiliates, is entitled to sell such shares without complying with the manner of sale, public information, volume limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144. Therefore, unless otherwise restricted, "144(k) shares" may be sold immediately upon the completion of our initial public offering.
Registration Rights
The holders of 41,492,641 shares of our common stock may demand that we register their shares under the Securities Act of 1933 or, if we file another registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, may elect to include their shares in such registration. If these shares are registered, they will be freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act of 1933. For additional information, see "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions — Registration Rights."
126
Certain legal matters relating to this offering will be passed upon for us by Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York, New York, in connection with this offering. The underwriters are being represented by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, New York.
The consolidated financial statements of RiskMetrics Group Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 and for the three years ended December 31, 2006 included in this prospectus and the related financial statement schedule included elsewhere in the registration statement have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein (which report expresses an unqualified opinion on the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule and includes an explanatory paragraph referring to our adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, effective January 1, 2006) and have been so included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, has audited the consolidated financial statements of Institutional Shareholder Services Holdings, Inc. at December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, as set forth in their report. We have included the financial statements of Institutional Shareholder Services Holdings, Inc. in the prospectus and elsewhere in the registration statement in reliance on Ernst & Young LLP's report, given their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with respect to the shares of common stock that are being offered by this prospectus. This prospectus, which is a part of the registration statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules to the registration statement. Refer to the registration statement, exhibits and schedules for further information with respect to the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus. Statements contained in this prospectus regarding the contents of any contract or other documents are only summaries. With respect to any contract or document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, you should refer to the exhibit for a copy of the contract or document, and each statement in this prospectus regarding that contract or document is qualified by reference to the exhibit. The registration statement, including all exhibits, may be inspected without charge at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Our SEC filings also are available to the public from the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.
Website Access to our Periodic SEC Reports
The Internet address of our corporate website is www.riskmetrics.com. We intend to make our periodic SEC reports (on Forms 10-K and 10-Q) and current reports (on Form 8-K), as well as the beneficial ownership reports filed by our directors, officers and 10% stockholders (on Forms 3, 4 and 5) available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed electronically with the SEC. We may from time to time provide important disclosures to investors by posting them in the investor relations section of our website, as allowed by SEC rules. The information on our website is not a part of this prospectus and will not be part of any of our periodic or current reports to the SEC.
127
RISKMETRICS GROUP, INC.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
Page |
|
---|---|---|
RiskMetrics Group, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2007 and for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 (unaudited) | ||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet |
F-2 |
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income | F-3 | |
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity | F-4 | |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | F-5 | |
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | F-6 | |
RiskMetrics Group, Inc. Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 and for the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 |
||
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
F-28 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets | F-29 | |
Consolidated Statements of Income | F-30 | |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity | F-31 | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | F-32 | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | F-33 | |
Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts | F-55 | |
Institutional Shareholder Services Holdings, Inc. Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 and for the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 |
||
Report of Independent Auditors |
F-56 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets | F-57 | |
Consolidated Statements of Income | F-58 | |
Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Preferred Stock and Stockholders' Deficit | F-59 | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | F-60 | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | F-61 |
F-1
RISKMETRICS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
JUNE 30, 2007
|
June 30, 2007 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASSETS | |||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 21,460,099 | |||||
Investments, at fair value (cost of $21,125,188) | 21,125,000 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $397,396 | 42,614,413 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable | 5,741,398 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset | 1,485,194 | ||||||
Other receivables and prepaid expenses | 7,701,345 | ||||||
Total current assets | 100,127,449 | ||||||
Property and equipment — net | 13,221,707 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset — noncurrent portion | 13,784,541 | ||||||
Intangibles — net | 163,976,541 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs, net | 9,396,955 | ||||||
Goodwill | 420,535,542 | ||||||
Other assets | 4,127,916 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 725,170,651 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | |||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | |||||||
Trade accounts payable | $ | 2,135,858 | |||||
Accrued expenses | 18,291,993 | ||||||
Debt, current portion | 3,000,000 | ||||||
Deferred revenue | 100,959,318 | ||||||
Other current liabilities | 220,693 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 124,607,862 | ||||||
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: | |||||||
Debt | 421,250,000 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities | 50,367,133 | ||||||
Deferred revenue-noncurrent portion | 448,625 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 3,040,572 | ||||||
Total long-term liabilities | 475,106,330 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 599,714,192 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | |||||||
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY: |
|||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value — 150,000,000 authorized; 46,487,549 issued and outstanding | 464,876 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 196,682,216 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 2,113,843 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (73,804,476 | ) | |||||
Total stockholders' equity | 125,456,459 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | $ | 725,170,651 | |||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-2
RISKMETRICS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2007
|
2006 |
2007 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REVENUES | $ | 50,918,913 | $ | 110,515,026 | |||||
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES: |
|||||||||
Cost of revenues (including stock-based compensation of $463,867 and $574,992 in 2006 and 2007, respectively) | 12,381,154 | 34,682,448 | |||||||
Research and development expenses (including stock-based compensation of $481,278 and $660,330 in 2006 and 2007, respectively) | 10,902,605 | 15,044,510 | |||||||
Selling and marketing expenses (including stock-based compensation of $259,231 and $552,654 in 2006 and 2007, respectively) | 7,333,098 | 16,412,530 | |||||||
General and administrative expenses (including stock-based compensation of $720,622 and $753,149 in 2006 and 2007, respectively) | 5,818,277 | 14,030,870 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 2,024,563 | 3,322,883 | |||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 769,906 | 8,623,459 | |||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment | 11,278 | 2,165 | |||||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 39,240,881 | 92,118,865 | |||||||
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS | 11,678,032 | 18,396,161 | |||||||
INTEREST, DIVIDEND AND INVESTMENT INCOME, NET: |
|||||||||
Interest, dividend and investment income | 992,709 | 1,154,741 | |||||||
Interest expense | (26,727 | ) | (17,993,573 | ) | |||||
Total interest, dividend and investment (expense) income, net | 965,982 | (16,838,832 | ) | ||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 12,644,014 | 1,557,329 | |||||||
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
4,280,614 |
812,303 |
|||||||
NET INCOME | $ | 8,363,400 | $ | 745,026 | |||||
INCOME PER SHARE: |
|||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.02 | |||||
Diluted | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.01 | |||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING: |
|||||||||
Basic | 42,767,808 | 45,309,870 | |||||||
Diluted | 47,929,746 | 53,589,319 |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-3
RISKMETRICS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 (UNAUDITED)
|
Common Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Number of Shares |
Amount |
Treasury Stock |
Additional Paid-In Capital |
Accumulated Deficit |
Total Stockholders' Equity |
||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE — January 1, 2007 | 42,530,053 | $ | 528,595 | $ | (103,294 | ) | $ | 130,764,921 | $ | (508,185 | ) | $ | (74,184,502 | ) | $ | 56,497,535 | ||||||||
Comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | — | — | 745,026 | 745,026 | |||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | — | — | — | — | 68,240 | — | 68,240 | |||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedge | — | — | — | — | 2,549,516 | — | 2,549,516 | |||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized loss on investments | — | — | — | — | 4,272 | — | 4,272 | |||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | 3,367,054 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement of outstanding treasury stock |
— |
(103,294 |
) |
103,294 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
||||||||||||||||
Common shares issued upon exercise of options | 1,183,145 | 11,831 | — | 4,647,559 | — | — | 4,659,390 | |||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | — | — | — | 2,541,125 | — | — | 2,541,125 | |||||||||||||||||
Common shares issued in connection with acquisition of ISS (see Note 3) | 2,774,351 | 27,744 | — | 42,397,807 | — | — | 42,425,551 | |||||||||||||||||
Options exchanged in connection with acquisition of ISS (see Note 3) | — | — | — | 16,330,804 | — | — | 16,330,804 | |||||||||||||||||
Adoption of FIN 48 (see Note 11) | — | — | — | — | — | (365,000 | ) | (365,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||
BALANCE — June 30, 2007 | 46,487,549 | $ | 464,876 | $ | — | $ | 196,682,216 | $ | 2,113,843 | $ | (73,804,476 | ) | $ | 125,456,459 | ||||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-4
RISKMETRICS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2007 (UNAUDITED)
|
2006 |
2007 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 8,363,400 | $ | 745,026 | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||||||
Provision for bad debts | 1,461 | 132,396 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 2,024,563 | 3,322,883 | |||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 769,906 | 8,623,459 | |||||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs | — | 677,013 | |||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 1,924,998 | 2,541,125 | |||||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment | 11,279 | 2,165 | |||||||||
Excess tax benefit associated with exercise of stock options | (1,118,158 | ) | — | ||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities (net of assets and liabilities acquired): | |||||||||||
Decrease in accounts receivable | 3,101,386 | 1,463,348 | |||||||||
(Decrease) increase in income tax receivable | (357,617 | ) | 412,405 | ||||||||
Increase in other receivables and prepaid expenses | (1,267,561 | ) | (1,640,524 | ) | |||||||
Decrease (increase) in other assets | 354,093 | (402,381 | ) | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in trade accounts payable | 237,942 | (1,321,038 | ) | ||||||||
Decrease in accrued expenses | (5,842,343 | ) | (12,620,264 | ) | |||||||
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities | (81,841 | ) | 142,130 | ||||||||
Decrease in deferred revenue | (5,054,461 | ) | (943,842 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 3,067,047 | 1,133,901 | |||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||
Cash paid to acquire Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. ("ISS") (net of cash acquired of $12,088,520) | — | (470,629,182 | ) | ||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment | (1,067,858 | ) | (3,587,318 | ) | |||||||
ISS acquisition related costs | — | (1,163,431 | ) | ||||||||
Payment of acquired ISS acquisition related costs | — | (7,413,478 | ) | ||||||||
Payment of deferred purchase price | — | (89,963 | ) | ||||||||
Purchase of investments | (39,718,056 | ) | (21,285,506 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from sale of investments | 40,987,183 | 68,235,389 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 201,269 | (435,933,489 | ) | ||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||
Proceeds from debt agreements | — | 425,000,000 | |||||||||
Repayment of debt | — | (750,000 | ) | ||||||||
Payment of debt issuance costs | — | (10,073,968 | ) | ||||||||
Principal payments on capital lease obligations | — | (10,874 | ) | ||||||||
Excess tax benefit associated with exercise of stock options | 1,118,158 | — | |||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 140,738 | 4,659,390 | |||||||||
Repurchase of stock | (8,657,220 | ) | — | ||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (7,398,324 | ) | 418,824,548 | ||||||||
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH | 207,872 | 121,951 | |||||||||
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | (3,922,136 | ) | (15,853,089 | ) | |||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — Beginning of period | 10,966,074 | 37,313,188 | |||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — End of period | $ | 7,043,938 | $ | 21,460,099 | |||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|||||||||||
NON CASH OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | — | $ | 17,136,247 | |||||||
Cash paid for taxes | $ | 5,636,726 | $ | 579,562 | |||||||
NON CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|||||||||||
Issuance of common stock to purchase ISS | $ | — | $ | 42,425,551 | |||||||
Issuance of stock options to purchase ISS | $ | — | $ | 16,330,804 | |||||||
Retirement of treasury stock | $ | — | $ | 103,294 | |||||||
Tax benefit associated with exercise of ISS stock options | $ | — | $ | 3,061,251 | |||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-5
RISKMETRICS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2007 (UNAUDITED)
1. OVERVIEW AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
RiskMetrics Group, Inc, ("the Company or RMG") is a leading provider of risk management and corporate governance products and services to participants in the global financial markets. The Company's solutions enable its clients to better understand and manage the risks associated with their financial holdings, provide greater transparency to their internal and external constituencies, satisfy regulatory and reporting requirements and make more informed investment decisions. The Company provides its solutions across multiple asset classes, markets and geographies to a diverse client base including asset managers, hedge funds, pension funds, banks, insurance companies, financial advisors and corporations. The Company operates in two business segments, the "RiskMetrics business" and the "ISS business".
Reorganization — RiskMetrics Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was formed in June 1998. In January 2007, the Company, which was formed by RiskMetrics Solutions, Inc., (i) completed a corporate reorganization in which all of RiskMetrics Solutions, Inc.'s then-outstanding capital stock automatically was converted into and exchanged for capital stock of the Company and (ii) acquired Institutional Shareholder Services Holdings, Inc. ("ISS") for approximately $542.6 million in order to increase the scale and scope of the Company's risk management solutions. ISS provides proxy research, voting recommendations, and governance advisory services to financial institutions and corporations worldwide. ISS institutional and corporate clients are located throughout North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. ISS analyzes proxy issues, issues research, and provides vote recommendations for companies across markets worldwide. Additionally, ISS provides services in the areas of Taft-Hartley proxy research and voting, social investment proxy research, voting and portfolio screening, global proxy distribution, and securities class action services.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation — The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of RMG and its wholly owned-subsidiaries: RiskMetrics (UK) Limited; RiskMetrics (Singapore) Pte Ltd; RiskMetrics Group, KK (Japan); and Arrakis, Inc., Institutional Shareholder Services Holdings, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries: Institutional Shareholder Services Inc; Securities Class Action Services, LLC; Institutional Shareholder Services Canada Corp.; ISS Europe Limited; ISS RREV, Inc.; Institutional Shareholder Services Japan, KK; Institutional Shareholder Services Europe S.A.; ISS France; 1 Corporate Governance Pty Ltd./Proxy Australia Pty Ltd. (Proxy Australia); Investor Responsibility Research Center, Inc. (IRRC); IRRC UK Ltd; ISS Corporate Services, Inc.; and Research, Recommendations and Electronic Voting Limited (RREV) and are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2007 and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 have not been audited, but in the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, have been made to present fairly the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The financial statements and related notes for the six months ended June 30, 2007 have been prepared on the same basis as and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 and for each of the three years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, included elsewhere within this registration statement. Certain information
F-6
and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules. However, the Company believes the disclosures made are adequate to keep the information presented from being misleading.
Stock split — In May 2007, the Company completed a 2.5 for 1 stock split. All share amounts reflected herein have been adjusted to reflect the impact of such split.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted within the United States of America require management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company considers the following accounting policies to be significant as a result of transactions that occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2007:
Goodwill and Intangibles — Goodwill consists of the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets of businesses acquired. The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142), under which goodwill is no longer amortized. Instead, goodwill is evaluated for impairment using a two-step process that is performed at least annually on October 1 of each year, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. The first step is a comparison of the fair value of an internal reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered impaired and the second step is unnecessary. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a second test is performed to measure the amount of impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the goodwill to a determination of the implied fair value of the goodwill. If the carrying amount of the goodwill is greater than the implied value, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference. The implied value of the goodwill is determined as of the test date by performing a purchase price allocation, as if the reporting unit had just been acquired, using currently estimated fair values of the individual assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, together with an estimate of the fair value of the reporting unit taken as a whole. The estimate of the fair value of the reporting unit is based upon information available regarding prices of similar groups of assets, or other valuation techniques including present value techniques based upon estimates of future cash flow.
Intangible assets, including technology, contracts, customer relationships, certain trade names, license agreements and non-compete agreements arising principally from acquisitions, are recorded at cost less accumulated amortization and the definite-lived intangibles are amortized using a method which reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the related intangible asset are consumed or utilized. Intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful lives, such as certain trade names, are not amortized and are subject to annual impairment tests or are tested whenever events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. An impairment exists if the carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value.
On January 11, 2007, the Company acquired ISS (See Note 3) which generated significant goodwill and intangibles. The goodwill acquired in the business acquisition is subject to the provisions of
F-7
SFAS 142, and, accordingly, is not being amortized. Acquired intangibles are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. The Company has not completed its valuation of tangible and intangible assets acquired in the ISS transaction or made a final determination as to the estimated useful lives of the assets. At June 30, 2007, intangible assets are amortized using the straight -line method over the following estimated useful lives:
Acquired technology | 5 years | |
Customer relationships | 9–11 years | |
Trade names — Definite lived | 10 years | |
— Indefinite lived | N/A |
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets — The Company follows SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Long-lived assets of the Company (other than deferred tax assets) including equipment, software development and leasehold improvements, trade names and furniture and fixtures are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the net carrying amount may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.
Property and Equipment and Related Depreciation and Amortization — Property and equipment are stated at cost at the date of acquisition. Depreciation is calculated using the straight line method over the estimated useful lives of the depreciable assets. Amortization of leasehold improvements is calculated using the straight line method over the shorter of the life of the asset or the term of the related lease. Improvements are capitalized, while repair and maintenance costs are charged to operations as incurred.
The Company follows the provisions of American Institute of Certified Public Accountants ("AICPA") Statement of Position ("SOP") No. 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use, for the capitalization of certain acquisition and development costs related to its internal use software. Capitalization begins when the preliminary project state is complete. Capitalization ceases when the internal project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. Once the project is complete and available for intended use, the Company amortizes these costs over a three year period.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007, $0 and $1,281,310 of internal software development costs have been capitalized, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007, amortization expense of $0 and $108,546 was recorded for internally developed software, respectively.
Depreciation and Amortization of Property and Equipment. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment includes depreciation of software, computer and related equipment, furniture and fixtures and telecommunications equipment, which is recorded over the respective useful life of the related asset. Depreciation also includes the amortization of leasehold improvements which are amortized over the shorter of the term of the lease or the assets' useful life and the amortization of capitalized software costs. While both leasehold improvements and
F-8
capitalized software costs are amortized, they are included in the depreciation line item in order to segregate amortization of intangibles which have been acquired from business acquisitions.
Amortization of Intangible Assets. Amortization of intangible assets includes the amortization of definite life intangibles such as acquired technology, contracts, customer relationships, certain trade names, license agreements and non-compete agreements acquired during business acquisitions and are amortized over their estimated useful lives.
Derivative Instruments — The Company's derivative instruments are subject to the guidance in SFAS No. 133 ("SFAS 133"), "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," and are recorded at fair value (the "Fair Value Derivatives"). Changes in fair value of the Fair Value Derivatives that have been designated as cash flow hedging instruments are included in the "Unrealized gains on cash flow hedges" as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of stockholders' equity to the extent of the effectiveness of such hedging instruments. Any ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the designated hedging instruments is included in the condensed consolidated statements of income. Changes in fair value of the Fair Value Derivatives that have not been designated as hedging instruments are included in the condensed consolidated statements of income.
Revenue Recognition — The majority of the Company's revenues are generated from contracted annual subscriptions, for which the Company receives licensing fees from clients who utilize the Company's products and services. Revenues are recognized on a straight line basis over the term of the licensed service subscription which is typically one to three years.
Subscription revenue is recognized in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 104, Revenue Recognition, since the Company provides its application as a service. The Company also recognizes revenue on software sales in accordance with the AICPA SOP No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended by SOP No. 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions.
Revenue is recognized when all of the following conditions are met:
In situations where contracts include client acceptance provisions, the Company does not recognize revenue until such time as the client has confirmed its acceptance. Amounts that have been invoiced are recorded in accounts receivable and in deferred revenue or revenue, depending on whether the revenue recognition criteria have been met. Some of the Company's subscription contracts include automatic renewal provisions under existing contract terms. Reserves for possible losses on subscription service, if any, are recognized when determined.
A portion of the Company's revenues are derived from non-subscription services including implementation, compensation advisory and overages related to proxy services. Revenues from implementation are recognized on a deferred basis as the services are provided and other
F-9
non-recurring revenues are recognized once the service is provided or upon delivery of the required service.
Deferred Revenue — Deferred revenue primarily consists of payments received in advance of revenue recognition from the Company's subscription service described above and is recognized as revenue recognition criteria are met. The Company generally invoices its customers in annual or quarterly installments. Accordingly, the deferred revenue balance does not represent the total contract value of annual or multi-year, non-cancelable subscription agreements.
Concentration of Risk — The Company's customers are primarily commercial organizations headquartered in the United States, Canada, Europe, Asia, Middle East, and Africa.
Accounts receivable are generally unsecured. Accounts receivable are due in accordance with payment terms included in contracts negotiated with customers. Amounts due from customers are stated net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts that are outstanding longer than the contracted payment terms are considered past due. The Company determines its allowance for doubtful accounts by considering a number of factors, including the length of time accounts are past due, the customer's current ability to pay its obligations to the Company, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. The Company writes-off accounts receivable when they are deemed uncollectible.
The carrying amount of current assets and liabilities approximates their fair values due to their short-term maturities. The fair value of long term debt approximates its carrying amount as of June 30, 2007 based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company.
Cost of Revenues — Cost of revenues is comprised of all direct costs associated with the production of revenues including compensation and compensation-related costs, employee benefit expense, employee hiring costs, third-party contract services related to production of revenues, an allocation of occupancy and telecommunication costs which is determined on a head count basis, web-hosting expense and data.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — The Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment,("SFAS 123(R)") as of January 1, 2006. The new pronouncement replaces the existing requirements under SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation to Employees ("APB 25"). According to SFAS 123 (R), all forms of share-based payments to employees, including employee stock options and employee stock purchase plans, would be treated the same as any other form of compensation by recognizing the related cost in the statement of income. This pronouncement eliminates the ability to account for stock-based compensation transactions using APB 25 and generally would require that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value method.
Under SFAS 123(R), stock-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award, and the cost is recognized as expense ratably over the award's vesting period. The Company measures the fair value of stock options on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
Determining the fair value of stock options required the Company to make several estimates, including the volatility of its stock price, the expected life of the option, and interest rates. Since
F-10
the Company is not currently a publicly traded company, it has limited historical information on the price of its stock as well as employees' stock option exercise behavior. Because of this limitation, the Company cannot rely on its historical experience alone to develop assumptions for stock price volatility and the expected life of its options. The Company estimated stock-price volatility with reference to a peer group of companies. Determining the companies to include in this peer group involves judgment. The use of different assumptions in the Black-Scholes model would result in different amounts of stock-based compensation expense. The expected life of the options is based on internal studies of historical experience and projected exercise behavior of employees based on the Company's future prospects. The Company utilizes a risk-free interest rate, which is based on the yield of U.S. zero coupon securities with a maturity equal to the expected life of the options. The Company has not and does not expect to pay dividends on its common shares.
Under SFAS 123(R), the Company is required to estimate expected forfeitures of stock-based awards at the grant date and recognize compensation cost only for those awards expected to vest. The forfeiture assumption is ultimately adjusted to the actual forfeiture rate. Therefore, changes in the forfeiture assumptions may impact the total amount of expense ultimately recognized over the vesting period. Estimated forfeitures will be reassessed in subsequent periods and may change based on new facts and circumstances. The adoption of SFAS 123(R) did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company recognized compensation for unvested awards under the graded vesting method, and the Company will continue to do so in all grants made prior to January 1, 2006. For all grants made subsequent to January 1, 2006, the Company will recognize compensation cost under the straight-line method.
Income Taxes — The Company follows SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes ("SFAS 109"), and as such records income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 ("FIN 48"). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainties in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with SFAS 109. FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. Under FIN 48, the tax effects of a position should be recognized only if it is "more likely-than-not" to be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on its technical merits as of the reporting date. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company has adopted the provisions of FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007 (see Note 10).
Effects of Recently Issued Accounting Standards — In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, or SFAS 157. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
F-11
measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS 157 are effective beginning after January 1, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, of SFAS 157 on the condensed consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, or SFAS 159, providing companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. SFAS 159's objective is to reduce both complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. Accounting principles generally accepted within the United States have required different measurement attributes for different assets and liabilities that can create artificial volatility in earnings. SFAS 159 helps to mitigate this type of accounting-induced volatility by enabling companies to report related assets and liabilities at fair value, which would likely reduce the need for companies to comply with detailed rules for hedge accounting. SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of asset and liabilities. SFAS 159 requires companies to provide additional information that will help investors and other users of financial statements to more easily understand the effect of the Company's choice to use fair value on its earnings. It also requires entities to display the fair value of these assets and liabilities for which the Company has chosen to use fair value on the face of the balance sheet. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, of SFAS 159 on the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3. ACQUISITION
On January 11, 2007, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of ISS for approximately $542.6 million. The purpose of the acquisition was to broaden the types of services the Company could offer its clients. The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase and the operating results of ISS have been included in the condensed financial statements since the date of acquisition.
F-12
The aggregate consideration paid for the acquisition is as follows:
|
(in thousands) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Cash paid | $ | 482,718 | |
Fair value of 2,774,351 common shares issued | 42,426 | ||
Fair value of stock options exchanged (1,396,000 shares underlying the stock options) |
16,331 | ||
Transaction costs | 1,163 | ||
Total purchase consideration | $ | 542,638 | |
The Company valued the common shares issued in exchange for stock options held by employees and those issued to ISS shareholders at $15.29 per share (see Note 13).
The fair value of converted stock options issued in connection with the acquisition was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model utilizing the following weighted-average assumptions:
Risk-free interest rate | 4.7 | % | |
Expected term (in years) | 3.0 | ||
Expected stock price volatility | 31 | % | |
Expected dividend yield | None |
The initial purchase price allocations are preliminary and may be adjusted for changes in estimates of the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The Company expects that the purchase price allocations will be finalized by December 31, 2007. The significant assumptions used in the valuation included factors affecting the duration, growth rates and amounts of future cash flows for each income stream, specifically: the future economic outlook for the industry, risks involved in the business, and the input of competition and technological changes. The following table summarizes the preliminary amounts allocated to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based upon management's estimates, with assistance from an independent valuation firm:
|
(in thousands) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cash and cash equivalents and other current assets | $ | 47,405 | ||
Property and equipment | 4,864 | |||
Non-current assets | 13,300 | |||
Intangible assets | 172,600 | |||
Goodwill | 423,597 | |||
Total assets acquired | 661,766 | |||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(21,378 |
) |
||
Deferred revenue | (43,510 | ) | ||
Other non-current liabilities | (1,533 | ) | ||
Deferred tax liability | (52,707 | ) | ||
Net assets acquired | $ | 542,638 | ||
Goodwill |
$ |
423,597 |
||
Identifiable intangible assets | 172,600 | |||
Deferred tax liability | (52,707 | ) | ||
Net liabilities assumed | (852 | ) | ||
Total purchase consideration | $ | 542,638 | ||
F-13
In accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, the Company has provided for deferred taxes of $52.7 million representing the difference between the currently estimated book and tax basis of the net assets acquired. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed was allocated to goodwill, which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The Company did not recognize a deferred tax asset relating to the future tax distribution that will arise when the ISS employee rollover options are exercised. When such exercises occur and a tax deduction is ultimately realized, the Company will recognize such benefit as a reduction of goodwill.
The purchase price for ISS was determined based on an auction whereby several companies arrived at a market price for the purchase of ISS. The Company believes the purchase price reflects the financial prospects of the existing business as well as the significant opportunities for revenue growth, cost savings and other synergies, including the ability to cross-sell to one anothers clients, and offer more comprehensive and diverse services. The value reflected in these elements of the purchase price does not meet the definition of an intangible asset under SFAS 141 and is therefore reflected as goodwill. The preliminary amounts allocated to intangible assets and acquired technology were attributed to the following categories and estimated useful lives:
|
(in thousands) |
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acquired technology | $ | 25,300 | 5 years | ||
Customer relationships | 117,900 | 9–11 years | |||
Trade names | 29,400 | 10 years–indefinite | |||
$ | 172,600 | ||||
Certain of the trade names have indefinite lives and are accounted for in a similar manner as to goodwill. As a result, no amortization expense has been recorded on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 relating to these trade names.
The following table summarizes unaudited pro forma financial information for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 assuming the acquisition of ISS had occurred on January 1 of each period.
|
June 30, 2006 |
June 30, 2007 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|||||||
Revenues | $ | 101,339 | $ | 113,842 | ||||
Income from operations | 11,933 | 5,180 | ||||||
Net loss | (3,075 | ) | (8,348 | ) | ||||
Net loss per share: | ||||||||
Basic and diluted | (0.07 | ) | (0.18 | ) |
Included in pro forma loss from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2007 are $13.4 million of non-recurring expenses, incurred by ISS in connection with its acquisition by RMG, which were for prior services rendered and a $1.2 million non-recurring charge associated with the pre-existing indebtedness of ISS, all of which will have no continuing impact on the Company's financial statements. The pro forma net loss for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 includes $17.5 million and $18.0 million of interest expense associated with debt incurred to acquire ISS. In addition, pro forma net loss for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 includes $9.2 million of amortization of intangibles resulting from the Company's preliminary allocation of fair value.
F-14
These unaudited pro forma results are intended for informational purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred had the ISS acquisition been in effect at the beginning of the periods presented, or of future results of the combined operations.
4. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Unbilled accounts receivable represents revenue that has been earned based on services performed; however, billing has yet to commence under contractual terms of the arrangement. Accounts receivable consisted of the following:
|
June 30, 2007 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Billed | $ | 41,839,128 | |
Unbilled | 1,172,681 | ||
Total | 43,011,809 | ||
Less allowance for doubtful accounts | 397,396 | ||
Accounts receivable, net | $ | 42,614,413 | |
5. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment as of June 30, 2007 consisted of the following:
|
Estimated Useful Life |
June 30, 2007 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cost: | |||||||
Hardware | 3 years | $ | 15,541,126 | ||||
Software | 4 years | 5,200,101 | |||||
Capitalized software | 3 years | 1,281,310 | |||||
Telecommunications equipment | 5 years | 569,648 | |||||
Furniture and fixtures | 7 years | 1,943,111 | |||||
Leasehold improvements | Shorter of the term of the lease or life of the asset | 4,594,110 | |||||
29,129,406 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (15,907,699 | ) | |||||
Property and equipment — net |
$ | 13,221,707 | |||||
As a result of the ISS acquisition, the Company acquired approximately $4,864,000 of property and equipment representing its estimated fair value, particularly furniture and fixtures, computer hardware and leasehold improvements. These assets will be depreciated in accordance with the estimated remaining useful lives of the assets or amortized over the remaining life of the lease, which lives range from 2 to 5.5 years. In total, RMG recognized $2,024,563 and $3,322,883 of depreciation and amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
F-15
6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL
Intangible assets as of June 30, 2007 consist of the following:
|
June 30, 2007 |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lives |
Gross |
Amortization |
Net |
|||||||
Customer relationships | 9–11 yrs. | $ | 117,900,000 | $ | (5,175,206 | ) | $ | 112,724,794 | |||
Acquired technology | 5 yrs | 25,300,000 | (2,380,376 | ) | 22,919,624 | ||||||
Trade names | 10 yrs | 22,700,000 | (1,067,877 | ) | 21,632,123 | ||||||
Trade names | Indefinite | 6,700,000 | — | 6,700,000 | |||||||
Total | $ | 172,600,000 | $ | (8,623,459 | ) | $ | 163,976,541 | ||||
Amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007, was $769,906 and $8,623,459, respectively, and is included in amortization on the condensed consolidated statements of income. Annual amortization expense, which is based on preliminary estimates of the values of ISS intangibles and their useful lives, for the next five years, is expected to be as follows:
Remainder of year ending December 31, 2007 | $ | 9,165,505 | |
Years ending December 31, | |||
2008 | $ | 18,331,010 | |
2009 | $ | 18,331,010 | |
2010 | $ | 18,331,010 | |
2011 | $ | 18,331,010 |
Goodwill changed during the six months ended June 30, 2007 as follows:
|
(in thousands) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Balance at January 1, 2007 | $ | — | |
Goodwill from ISS acquisition | 423,597 | ||
Less: Tax benefit on exercise of stock options granted to ISS employees on acquisition | 3,061 | ||
Balance at June 30, 2007 | $ | 420,536 | |
7. DEBT
In conjunction with the purchase of ISS on January 11, 2007, a subsidiary of the Company obtained $450 million of debt of which $425 million was borrowed to complete the acquisition. The debt is comprised of two term loan facilities and a revolving credit facility:
The first lien credit facilities consists of a $25 million revolving credit facility and $300 million of first lien term loan facility and accumulates interest, at the option of the Company at: (a) the LIBOR rate plus a margin of 1.75% to 2.25% depending on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio, or (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% and (ii) Bank of America's "prime rate," plus a margin of 0.75% or 1.25% depending on the consolidated leverage ratio. As of June 30, 2007, no amounts have been borrowed under the revolving credit facility. Amounts paid under the first lien term loan facility may not be re-borrowed. The maturity date for the revolving credit facility and first lien term loan facility is January 2013 and January 2014, respectively.
F-16
The second lien term loan facility is for $125 million and accumulates interest based on, at the option of the Company at: (a) the LIBOR rate plus a margin of 5.50%, or (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 5.0% and (ii) Bank of America's "prime rate," plus a margin of 4.50%. The maturity date for the second credit lien is July 2014.
The interest rate on the first lien term loan facility, first lien revolving credit facility, and second lien term loan facility was 7.61%, 7.61% and 10.86%, respectively, as of June 30, 2007.
In addition to quarterly interest payments due on the credit facilities, the Company is required to repay the principal amounts of the first lien credit facilities in quarterly installments of $750,000 starting on June 30, 2007, which was paid by the Company. Furthermore, starting after the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, the Company is required to make a mandatory payment equal to 50% of each year's excess cash flow, as defined in the first lien term loan facility, within five days of delivery of audited financial statements. The Company is required to repay the aggregate principal remaining on the first lien term loan facility and all amounts outstanding under the second lien credit facility on the maturity date. The Company may voluntarily prepay the first lien credit facilities in whole or in part without penalty. Prepayment of the second lien term loan facility, incurs a penalty of up to 2.0% of the principal amount in the first year of the term (except in the event of an IPO, in which case the prepayment penalty is 1.0%) and 1.0% in the second year of the term, after which, there is no penalty.
Scheduled repayments of balances outstanding as of June 30, 2007 are as follows:
For the twelve months ending June 30, | |||
2008 | $ | 3,000,000 | |
2009 | 3,000,000 | ||
2010 | 3,000,000 | ||
2011 | 3,000,000 | ||
2012 | 3,000,000 | ||
Thereafter | 409,250,000 | ||
$ | 424,250,000 | ||
The Company has guaranteed the payment and performance of the credit facilities. The restrictive covenants set forth in the first and second lien credit facilities restrict the Company from, among other things: permitting liens on their assets; incurring additional indebtedness (as defined per the debt agreement); making investments exceeding specific dollar amounts; making dispositions; making restricted payments; making fundamental changes to the business; changes in nature of business; restricting ability to pay dividends; entering into transactions with affiliates not in the ordinary course of business; use of proceeds to purchase margin stock; making amendments to the organization documents which are materially adverse to the lenders; making changes in accounting polices except as required by generally accepted accounting principles; prepayments of indebtedness (subject to amounts defined in the credit facilities); making amendments to second lien documents and indebtedness; and becoming legally obligated to make capital expenditures except in the ordinary course of business.
The indebtedness was obtained by a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the "Borrower"). The Company, as parent holding company, has no independent assets or operations, and any other subsidiaries, other than the Borrower and its subsidiaries, are minor. The Company has guaranteed the indebtedness and such guarantee is full and unconditional. In addition, there are no restrictions on the ability of the Company to obtain funds from its subsidiaries by dividend or loan.
F-17
The credit facilities include certain covenants related to the delivery of financial results, maintenance of properties and insurance, consolidated leverage ratio limitations and limitations of capital expenditures.
Upon the occurrence of an event of default under the credit facilities, the lenders may require that all amounts outstanding be repaid immediately and terminate the Company's ability to make further borrowings and foreclose on the collateral. Events relating to non-payment of amounts due under the credit facilities; breach of covenants; misrepresentation; insolvency of the Company; certain ERISA events; inability to pay the debts; change of control; invalidity of loan documents; certain judgments against any parties; cross-default; and failure of collateral agreements to be in effect are considered to be events of default after the passage of time or notice or both. The Company is currently in compliance with such debt covenants and expects to remain in compliance for the foreseeable future.
The Company incurred debt issuance costs of $10,073,968, which have been recorded on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. Such amount is being amortized over the life of the remaining debt and is reflected as a component of interest expense on the accompanying statement of operations. Amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was $677,013.
8. FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
In February 2007, the Company entered into two interest-rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional principal amount of approximately $318.2 million to reduce interest rate risks and to manage interest expense. By entering into these agreements, the Company changed the fixed/variable interest-rate mix of its debt portfolio. The agreements effectively convert floating-rate debt into fixed-rate debt. This reduces the Company's risk of incurring higher interest costs in periods of rising interest rates. The interest rate swap agreements reduced the Company's weighted average effective interest rate on the first lien term loan facility to 7.41% and on the second lien term loan facility to 10.67%, which resulted in investment income of $302,431 being recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The Company's interest-rate swap agreements hedge a substantial portion of the interest rate risk exposure under the Company's debt (see Note 7). As of June 30, 2007, the swap agreements had a fair value of $2,549,516, which is included in other assets on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.
These hedges of interest rate risk relating to the Company's debt have been designated as effective cash flow hedges at inception and on an ongoing quarterly basis. The Company estimates the effectiveness of the interest rate swap agreement utilizing the hypothetical derivative method. Under this method, the fair value of the actual interest rate swap agreement is compared to the fair value of a hypothetical swap agreement that has the same critical terms as the portion of the loan being hedged. The critical terms of the interest rate swap agreement are identical to the portion of the loan being hedged as of June 30, 2007. To the extent that the agreement is not considered to be highly effective in offsetting the change in the value of the interest payments being hedged, the fair value relating to the ineffective portion of such agreement and any subsequent changes in such fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings. To the extent that the agreement is considered highly effective but not completely effective in offsetting the change in the value of the interest payments being hedged, any changes in fair value relating to the ineffective portion of such agreement will be immediately recognized in earnings. There was no ineffectiveness from these hedges through June 30, 2007. As such, the gains and losses have been
F-18
included in the unrealized gain on cash flow hedges as a component of other comprehensive income (loss).
9. ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued expenses as of June 30, 2007 consist of the following:
|
June 30, 2007 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Accrued compensation and related benefits | $ | 13,851,772 | |
Accrued data expense | 1,850,229 | ||
Accrued travel and entertainment | 191,253 | ||
Accrued professional fees | 464,004 | ||
Current portion of deferred rent | 221,550 | ||
Other accrued expenses | 1,713,185 | ||
Total | $ | 18,291,993 | |
10. INCOME TAXES
As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized a $365,000 increase in the current tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits and a corresponding increase to the January 1, 2007 balance of accumulated deficit. As of the date of adoption and after the impact of recognizing the increase in liability noted above, the Company's unrecognized tax benefits totaled $775,000, of which $365,000 would favorably impact the Company's effective tax rate, if recognized. The remaining $410,000 of liability for unrecognized tax benefits represents deferred tax liabilities established by ISS effective January 1, 2007. Since the liability was recognized prior to the date of acquisition, if such liability is reversed in the future it will be reflected as a reduction of goodwill.
The Company's tax returns for 2003-2005 remain open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service in their entirety. They also remain open with respect to state taxing jurisdictions. The Company recognizes potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. As of January 1, 2007, the Company recorded a liability of approximately $79,000 for the payment of interest and $100,000 for potential penalties. The change to the uncertain tax positions or interest and penalty accruals for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was not material. The change in the unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months is not expected to be material to the financial statements.
The components of the provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 are as follows:
|
2006 |
2007 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Federal | $ | 2,776,001 | $ | 309,564 | |||
State | 1,036,253 | (79,531 | ) | ||||
Foreign | 468,360 | 582,270 | |||||
Total | $ | 4,280,614 | $ | 812,303 | |||
F-19
The expected tax provision calculated at the statutory federal rate differs from the actual (benefit) provision for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 as follows:
|
2006 |
2007 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tax provision, at U.S. Federal statutory tax rate | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | |
State and local income taxes, net of U.S. federal benefit | 5.3 | % | (3.3 | )% | |
Stock-based compensation and other non-deductible expenses | 3.4 | % | 31.3 | % | |
Other | (9.8 | )% | (10.8 | )% | |
Net tax provision | 33.9 | % | 52.2 | % | |
Non-deductible expenses is primarily comprised of non-deductible stock based compensation expense and other is primarily comprised of foreign tax credits, R&D credits and foreign income tax rate differentials. As a result of the exercise of stock options, the Company generated approximately $1.1 million and $3.1 million of tax benefits during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007, respectively. The amount recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2007 was recognized as a reduction of goodwill (see Note 3). At June 30, 2007, the Company has an income tax receivable of $5.7 million which arose primarily from a receivable that ISS had generated prior to the date of its acquisition by the Company.
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company is committed to unrelated parties for the rental of office space under operating leases. ISS leases office space and equipment under various capital and operating lease agreements. Certain of the leases contain a requirement for the Company to pay its share of any increases in operating expenses and real estate taxes. The lease agreements for RMG's and ISS' primary office space terminate in August 2012 and July 2012, respectively.
As of June 30, 2007, minimum future rental payments under operating and capital leases are as follows:
Twelve months ending June 30, | |||
2008 | $ | 5,321,859 | |
2009 | 4,522,755 | ||
2010 | 4,375,400 | ||
2011 | 3,891,839 | ||
2012 | 3,743,065 | ||
Thereafter | 1,375,956 | ||
Total minimum lease payments | $ | 23,230,874 | |
Rent expense on leases was $946,155 and $2,946,365 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Data Agreements — The Company has entered into agreements with other vendors to supply the Company with data, which have terms that extend through 2011. The aggregate minimum payments with respect to these data agreements as of June 30, 2007, are as follows:
Twelve months ending June 30, | |||
2008 | $ | 5,185,152 | |
2009 | 3,148,544 | ||
2010 | 1,775,425 | ||
2011 | 84,500 | ||
Total | $ | 10,193,621 | |
F-20
Contingencies — The Company has no lawsuits against it nor has the Company initiated any against any others. The Company believes that any potential liability arising from unknown actions or claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's condensed consolidated results of income, financial condition, or liquidity.
12. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
In January 2007, the Company acquired ISS. As part of the consideration paid to ISS, 2,774,351 shares of the Company's common stock with a value of approximately $42.4 million were issued. As well, former ISS employee options held were exchanged for 1,396,000 options of the Company with an estimated fair market value of approximately $16.3 million.
In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2007, $4.7 million of proceeds were received from the exercise of stock options which resulted in the issuance of 1,183,145 shares of the Company's common stock.
Prior to the reorganization described in Note 1, the authorized capital stock of the Company consisted of 87,500,000 shares of common stock, which have a stated par value of $.01 per share and was increased to 150,000,000 shares on January 11, 2007. In connection with the reorganization, the Company retired the 10,329,407 shares held as treasury stock.
Effective in 2000, the Company began repurchasing shares of its common stock from employees and holds these repurchased shares as treasury stock. During the six months ended June 30, 2006 1,382,288 shares were repurchased for a total cost of $8,657,220.
13. STOCK OPTION PLANS
During 2000, the Company's Board of Directors adopted a Stock Option Plan (the "2000 Plan") that provided for the grant of options to employees, consultants, and non-employee directors to purchase common stock, which vest over a one to four year period and have a ten-year contractual term. The maximum number of shares of the Company's common stock available for issuance under the 2000 Plan was 12,500,000, and no more than 4,000,000 were allowed to be issued in any calendar year. Subsequent to the 2004 private placement, the Company retired the 2000 Plan and adopted a new option plan (the "2004 Plan"). As of June 30, 2007, 6,748,392 of options issued under the 2000 Plan remain outstanding.
The 2004 Plan provides for the grant of options to employees, consultants, and non-employee directors to purchase common stock, which vest over a three to four year period and have a ten-year contractual term. To satisfy options granted under the Plan, the Company may make common stock available from authorized but unissued shares or shares held in treasury by the Company. The maximum number of shares of the Company's common stock available for issuance under the 2004 Plan is 7,500,000. Subsequent to the acquisition of ISS, the Company retired the 2004 plan and adopted a new option plan (the "2007 plan"). As of June 30, 2007, 4,955,589 options issued under the 2004 Plan remain outstanding.
In January 2007, the Company's Board of Directors adopted a stock option plan covering the employees from ISS (the "ISS Plan"), which resulted in the rollover of 1,396,000 fully-vested options from ISS. Under the adoption of this ISS Plan, no additional options are to be issued. As of June 30, 2007, 485,309 options issued under the ISS Plan remain outstanding.
F-21
In January 2007 the Company's Board of Directors adopted a Stock Option Plan (the "2007 Plan") that provides for the grant of options to employees, consultants, and non-employee directors to purchase common stock, which vest over a four year period and have a ten-year contractual term. The maximum number of shares of the Company's common stock available for issuance under the 2007 Plan is 6,500,000. As of June 30, 2007, 1,733,250 options issued under the 2007 Plan remain outstanding.
Summarized information relative to the Company's stock option plans is as follows:
|
Number of Options |
Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outstanding — January 1, 2006 | 11,295,101 | $ | 3.20 | |||
Granted |
278,750 |
7.20 |
||||
Exercised | (576,750 | ) | 1.78 | |||
Forfeited | (106,801 | ) | 4.96 | |||
Outstanding — June 30, 2006 | 10,890,300 | 3.36 | ||||
Outstanding — January 1, 2007 |
12,035,192 |
4.49 |
||||
Granted |
1,733,250 |
15.29 |
||||
ISS roll-over options | 1,396,000 | 4.15 | ||||
Exercised | (1,183,145 | ) | 3.94 | |||
Forfeited | (58,757 | ) | 5.91 | |||
Outstanding — June 30, 2007 | 13,922,540 | $ | 5.84 | |||
F-22
The Company's stock options outstanding at June 30, 2007 were as follows:
|
Outstanding Options |
Options Exercisable |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exercise Prices |
Number of Options |
Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (In Years) |
Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
Number of Options |
Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
||||||||
$ | 1.20 | 1,185,449 | 3.57 | $ | 1.20 | 1,185,449 | $ | 1.20 | |||||
1.48 | 169,141 | 9.53 | 1.48 | 169,141 | 1.48 | ||||||||
2.00 | 3,464,695 | 5.26 | 2.00 | 3,444,385 | 2.00 | ||||||||
2.33 | 9,505 | 9.53 | 2.33 | 9,505 | 2.33 | ||||||||
2.40 | 2,098,248 | 6.51 | 2.40 | 1,807,419 | 2.40 | ||||||||
3.42 | 20,365 | 9.53 | 3.42 | 20,365 | 3.42 | ||||||||
3.75 | 352,500 | 7.26 | 3.75 | 232,085 | 3.75 | ||||||||
4.46 | 205,660 | 9.53 | 4.46 | 205,660 | 4.46 | ||||||||
4.80 | 1,359,998 | 7.54 | 4.80 | 676,878 | 4.80 | ||||||||
5.05 | 35,503 | 9.53 | 5.05 | 35,503 | 5.05 | ||||||||
5.94 | 32,615 | 9.53 | 5.94 | 32,615 | 5.94 | ||||||||
6.00 | 325,000 | 8.09 | 6.00 | 120,315 | 6.00 | ||||||||
7.13 | 12,520 | 9.53 | 7.13 | 12,520 | 7.13 | ||||||||
7.20 | 1,823,736 | 8.58 | 7.20 | 412,099 | 7.20 | ||||||||
15.29 | 2,827,605 | 9.88 | 15.29 | — | — | ||||||||
13,922,540 | 7.14 | $ | 5.84 | 8,363,939 | $ | 2.65 | |||||||
As of June 30, 2007, 8,363,939 of the outstanding options are vested and exercisable at the weighted-average exercisable price of $2.65. Of the unvested options as of June 30, 2007, 5,002,741 are expected to vest in the future.
During the twelve months ended June 30, 2007, the Company granted the following stock options with exercise prices as follows:
Grant Dates |
Number of Stock Options Granted |
Fair Value of Common Stock |
Exercise Price |
Intrinsic Value |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
July 20, 2006 | 55,000 | $ | 7.20 | * | $ | 7.20 | $ | — | |||
October 19, 2006 | 102,500 | 7.20 | * | 7.20 | — | ||||||
December 14, 2006 | 41,250 | 15.29 | ** | 15.29 | — | ||||||
December 31, 2006 | 1,053,105 | 15.29 | ** | 15.29 | — | ||||||
May 17, 2007 | 1,733,250 | 15.29 | ** | 15.29 | — |
F-23
The derived fair value of the common shares underlying the options was determined based on an internal valuation prepared by management, with the appropriate level of competency and reviews by the Board of Directors, using generally accepted valuation methodologies. Management applies the guideline companies approach which incorporates certain assumptions, including multiples of EBITDA and the market performance of comparable listed companies, as well as the financial results and growth trends of the Company, to derive the total equity value of the Company. The Company has granted options to employees at the estimated fair value without ascribing any discount.
The options granted in conjunction with the ISS acquisition were rolled over from ISS on January 11, 2007. Since the employee stock option compensation expense related to these 1,396,000 fully vested options under SFAS 123(R) is included within purchase price consideration (see Note 3), no additional SFAS 123(R) expense was or will be recorded prospectively by the Company.
The fair value of stock options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model utilizing the following weighted average assumptions:
|
Six months ended June 30, 2006 |
Six months ended June 30, 2007 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Risk-free interest rate | 4.7 | % | 4.7 | % | |
Expected term (in years) | 5.0 | 4.5 | |||
Expected stock price volatility | 31 | % | 29 | % | |
Expected dividend yield | None | None |
Expected volatilities are based on certain publicly traded companied that are comparable to the Company. The Company uses as estimated average turnover for the industry within the valuation model to estimate the expected life of the options. The interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the United States Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. As required by SFAS 123(R), management made an estimate of expected forfeitures for all unvested awards and is recognizing compensation costs only for those equity awards expected to vest.
As of June 30, 2007, there was $15,029,358 of unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested share-based compensation awards granted under all stock option plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a period of four years. Share-based compensation was $1,924,998 and $2,541,125 during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
14. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The Company follows SFAS 128, Earnings per Share, in calculating earnings per share. Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income attributable to common shareholders by a diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share reflects the potential dilution that would occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock, unless they are anti-dilutive.
F-24
In computing earnings per share for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007, the difference between basic and diluted number of common shares outstanding is as follows:
|
2006 |
2007 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Basic number of weighted average common shares outstanding | 42,767,808 | 45,309,870 | ||
Effect of dilutive securities — employee stock options | 5,161,938 | 8,279,449 | ||
Diluted number of weighted average common shares oustanding | 47,929,746 | 53,589,319 | ||
Options to purchase 1,882,196 and 1,525,273 common shares for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007, respectively, were anti-dilutive and were therefore excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share.
15. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Company sponsors two 401(k) plans, one for RiskMetrics employees and one plan for ISS employees. The participants may elect to defer eligible compensation up to governmental limitations. The Company, at the discretion of the Board of Directors, may make contributions to the plan. Expense related to all 401(k) plans was approximately $375,000 and $1,106,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
16. SEGMENT INFORMATION
As of June 30, 2007, the Company has two reportable segments, the RiskMetrics business and the ISS business. These designations have been made as the discrete operating results of these segments are reviewed by the Company's chief operating decision maker to assess performance and make operating and asset allocation decisions. All intersegment transactions have been eliminated in the condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company allocates corporate and other shared services to each segment based on the employees geographic location and headcount.
The RiskMetrics business is a leading provider of multi-asset, position-based risk and wealth management solutions. The business provides clients with comprehensive, interactive solutions that allow them to measure and quantify portfolio risk across security types, geographies and markets. The solutions enable the clients to make more informed investment decisions, monitor and comply with exposure and risk limits, provide greater transparency to both internal audiences and external constituencies and meet regulatory and reporting requirements.
The ISS business is a leading provider of corporate governance services to institutional shareholders and corporations around the world. The business facilitates the voting of proxies by institutional investors and provides in-depth research and analysis to help inform their voting decisions and assess issuer-specific risk. It offers both global security coverage and fully-integrated, end-to-end solutions, from policy creation to comprehensive research, vote recommendations, reliable vote execution, post-vote disclosure and reporting and analytical tools.
F-25
Results of operations by segment for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 is as follows:
|
RiskMetrics Business |
ISS Business |
Total |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Six months ended June 30, 2006: | |||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 50,918,913 | — | $ | 50,918,913 | ||||||
Depreciation | 2,024,563 | — | 2,024,563 | ||||||||
Amortization | 769,906 | — | 769,906 | ||||||||
Other operating expenses | 36,446,412 | — | 36,446,412 | ||||||||
Income from operations | $ | 11,678,032 | — | 11,678,032 | |||||||
Interest income | — | — | 992,709 | ||||||||
Interest expense | — | — | (26,727 | ) | |||||||
Income before income taxes | — | — | 12,644,014 | ||||||||
Provision for income taxes | — | — | 4,280,614 | ||||||||
Net income | — | — | $ | 8,363,400 | |||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2007: | |||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 56,736,264 | $ | 53,778,762 | $ | 110,515,026 | |||||
Depreciation | 2,170,431 | 1,152,452 | 3,322,883 | ||||||||
Amortization | — | 8,623,459 | 8,623,459 | ||||||||
Other operating expenses | 41,269,334 | 38,903,189 | 80,172,523 | ||||||||
Income from operations | $ | 13,296,499 | $ | 5,099,662 | 18,396,161 | ||||||
Interest, dividend and investment income | — | — | 1,154,741 | ||||||||
Interest expense | — | — | (17,993,573 | ) | |||||||
Income before income taxes | — | — | 1,557,329 | ||||||||
Provision for income taxes | — | — | 812,303 | ||||||||
Net income | — | — | $ | 745,026 | |||||||
Asset information: |
|||||||||||
Segment assets at June 30, 2007 | $ | 75,875,625 | $ | 649,295,026 | $ | 725,170,651 |
Prior to the acquisition of ISS on January 11, 2007, RMG operated within one segment, Risk Analysis, with various product offerings made available to our customers.
The following table summarizes revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 on a percentage basis by geographic region, based on the country in which the customer is located:
|
2006 |
2007 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Americas | 56 | % | 63 | % | |
EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) | 36 | % | 31 | % | |
Asia | 8 | % | 6 | % | |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
F-26
The Company has wholly owned subsidiaries in the United Kingdom, Singapore, Japan, Canada, Australia, France and Belgium and a branch in the Philippines, Switzerland and Germany. The Company's total assets located outside of the United States of America are as follows:
|
June 30, 2007 |
||
---|---|---|---|
United Kingdom | $ | 5,267,758 | |
Singapore | 239,626 | ||
Japan | 629,177 | ||
Switzerland | 273,999 | ||
Germany | 260,901 | ||
Philippines | 1,199,467 | ||
Canada | 1,234,187 | ||
Australia | 935,665 | ||
France | 98,214 | ||
Belgium | 3,501,590 | ||
$ | 13,640,584 | ||
At June 30, 2007, the Company had approximately $5,498,024 in receivables from customers of these subsidiaries. All other financial instruments or assets located in foreign countries or denominated in foreign currencies were insignificant at June 30, 2007.
17. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On August 1, 2007, the Company acquired all outstanding capital stock of CFRA (Center for Financial Research & Analysis) for a purchase price of approximately $64.1 million to increase the range of specialized research products and services that the Company can offer its clients. CFRA is a leading provider of forensic accounting research, legal/regulatory risk assessment, due diligence, and educational services. The addition of CFRA will allow the ISS segment to offer institutional investors a deeper qualitative view into portfolio companies. The acquisition is in line with the Company's plan to continually expand its services to offer a broad range of premium quality data, analytics, advice and services to investors. The purchase price included approximately $46.6 million of cash (including liquidation of investments held by the Company) and a draw-down on the available revolving line of credit for the remainder of the purchase price. CFRA had revenue and net loss of approximately $15.9 million and $0.1 million, respectively, for its last fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and $8.1 million and $0.2 million of revenue and net income, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
F-27
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To
the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
RiskMetrics Group, Inc. and subsidiaries
New York, New York
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of RiskMetrics Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2005 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. Our audits also included the information included in the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at page F-1. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2005 and 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
As discussed in note 2 to the financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for stock-based compensation upon adoption of the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, effective January 1, 2006.
/s/ Deloitte Touche LLP
May 4,
2007 (September 17, 2007 as to effect of stock split
described in Note 2 and Note 16)
F-28
RISKMETRICS GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 2005 AND 2006
|
2005 |
2006 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASSETS | |||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 10,966,074 | $ | 37,313,188 | |||||
Investments, at fair market value (cost of $69,489,106 and $68,075,000 at December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively) | 69,295,823 | 68,070,611 | |||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $318,000 and $265,000 at December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively | 20,086,189 | 16,216,483 | |||||||
Deferred tax asset | 50,469 | 78,811 | |||||||
Income taxes receivable | 287,230 | 938,279 | |||||||
Other receivables and prepaid expenses | 2,660,728 | 3,868,775 | |||||||
Total current assets | 103,346,513 | 126,486,147 | |||||||
DEFERRED TAX ASSET — Noncurrent portion |
2,004,669 |
1,167,909 |
|||||||
INTANGIBLES — Net |
769,906 |
— |
|||||||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT — Net |
8,355,185 |
8,047,273 |
|||||||
OTHER ASSETS |
816,855 |
1,245,275 |
|||||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 115,293,128 | $ | 136,946,604 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|||||||||
Trade accounts payable | $ | 1,052,844 | $ | 2,841,084 | |||||
Accrued expenses | 15,095,738 | 17,795,158 | |||||||
Deferred revenue | 53,040,078 | 58,308,330 | |||||||
Total current liabilities | 69,188,660 | 78,944,572 | |||||||
DEFERRED REVENUE — Noncurrent portion |
703,452 |
533,322 |
|||||||
DEFERRED RENT — Noncurrent portion |
1,131,194 |
971,175 |
|||||||
Total liabilities | 71,023,306 | 80,449,069 | |||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | |||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY: |
|||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value — 87,500,000 authorized; 52,717,068 and 52,859,460 issued and 43,342,270 and 42,530,053 outstanding at December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively | 527,171 | 528,595 | |||||||
Treasury stock — 9,374,798 and 10,329,405 shares at December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively | (93,748 | ) | (103,294 | ) | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 126,333,486 | 130,764,921 | |||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (606,861 | ) | (508,185 | ) | |||||
Accumulated deficit | (81,890,226 | ) | (74,184,502 | ) | |||||
Total stockholders' equity | 44,269,822 | 56,497,535 | |||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | $ | 115,293,128 | $ | 136,946,604 | |||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-29
RISKMETRICS GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2005 AND 2006
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REVENUES | $ | 71,698,607 | $ | 93,637,389 | $ | 101,235,954 | ||||||
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES: | ||||||||||||
Cost of revenues (including stock-based compensation of $345,591, $0 and $875,963 in 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively) | 18,909,372 | 23,704,646 | 25,617,521 | |||||||||
Research and development expenses (including stock-based compensation of $993,187, $0 and $908,841 in 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively) | 14,094,479 | 16,098,667 | 21,201,458 | |||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses (including stock-based compensation of $190,414, $0 and $489,529 in 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively) | 13,222,277 | 12,256,874 | 14,976,840 | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses (including stock-based compensation of $1,053,231, $0 and $1,360,816 in 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively) | 9,327,556 | 11,492,185 | 12,852,358 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 5,170,259 | 3,551,288 | 4,081,310 | |||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 1,078,444 | 2,712,762 | 769,906 | |||||||||
Impairment of goodwill | — | 361,264 | — | |||||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment | 1,659,351 | 1,577,363 | 15,335 | |||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 63,461,738 | 71,755,049 | 79,514,728 | |||||||||
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS | 8,236,869 | 21,882,340 | 21,721,226 | |||||||||
INTEREST, DIVIDEND AND INVESTMENT INCOME, NET: |
||||||||||||
Interest, dividend and investment income | 597,198 | 1,438,122 | 2,549,286 | |||||||||
Interest expense | — | — | (49,635 | ) | ||||||||
Total interest, dividend and investment income, net | 597,198 | 1,438,122 | 2,499,651 | |||||||||
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES | 8,834,067 | 23,320,462 | 24,220,877 | |||||||||
PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES |
(1,048,366 |
) |
7,639,771 |
8,199,945 |
||||||||
NET INCOME | $ | 9,882,433 | $ | 15,680,691 | $ | 16,020,932 | ||||||
INCOME PER SHARE: | ||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.38 | ||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.33 | ||||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING: | ||||||||||||
Basic | 30,379,564 | 43,496,221 | 42,655,069 | |||||||||
Diluted | 49,813,540 | 48,412,751 | 47,963,666 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements
F-30
RISKMETRICS GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006, 2005, AND 2004
|
Senior Convertible Preferred Stock |
Junior Convertible Preferred Stock |
Common Stock |
Treasury Stock |
Additional Paid-In Capital |
Accumulated Other Compre- hensive Loss |
Accumulated Deficit |
Total Stockholders' Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BALANCE — January 1, 2004 (as adjusted for stock split — see note 2) |
$ | 309,000 | $ | 46,500 | $ | 166,955 | $ | (16,900 | ) | $ | 25,725,763 | $ | (236,209 | ) | $ | (7,480,734 | ) | $ | 18,514,375 | |||||||||
Comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 9,882,433 | 9,882,433 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | 45,441 | 45,441 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized loss on investments, net of tax | (39,601 | ) | (39,601 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
9,888,273 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued in private placement | 325,313 | 121,667,690 | 121,993,003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs associated with private placement | (727,493 | ) | (727,493 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit associated with exercise of stock options | 49,752 | 49,752 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued upon exercise of options | 12,293 | 1,845,144 | 1,857,437 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reuters transaction, net of tax | (78,125 | ) | 1,524,047 | (2,443,750 | ) | (997,828 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation expense from option exercise | 2,582,423 | 2,582,423 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior preferred stock converted to common stock | (18,000 | ) | 18,000 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock repurchased | (212,875 | ) | (46,500 | ) | (71,645 | ) | (27,041,764 | ) | (95,713,045 | ) | (123,085,829 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
BALANCE — December 31, 2004 |
— |
— |
522,561 |
(88,545 |
) |
125,625,562 |
(230,369 |
) |
(95,755,096 |
) |
30,074,113 |
|||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 15,680,691 | 15,680,691 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | (286,915 | ) | (286,915 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain on investments | (89,577 | ) | (89,577 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
15,304,199 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit associated with exercise of stock options | 561,476 | 561,476 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued upon exercise of options | 4,610 | 828,510 | 833,120 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock repurchased | (5,203 | ) | (682,062 | ) | (1,815,821 | ) | (2,503,086 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE — December 31, 2005 |
— |
— |
527,171 |
(93,748 |
) |
126,333,486 |
(606,861 |
) |
(81,890,226 |
) |
44,269,822 |
|||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 16,020,932 | 16,020,932 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | (90,218 | ) | (90,218 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized loss on investments | 188,894 | 188,894 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
16,119,608 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit associated with exercise of stock options | 1,236,069 | 1,236,069 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation | 3,635,149 | 3,635,149 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued upon exercise of options | 1,424 | 253,257 | 254,681 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock repurchased | (9,546 | ) | (693,040 | ) | (8,315,208 | ) | (9,017,794 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE — December 31, 2006 |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
528,595 |
$ |
(103,294 |
) |
$ |
130,764,921 |
$ |
(508,185 |
) |
$ |
(74,184,502 |
) |
$ |
56,497,535 |
|||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-31
RISKMETRICS GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2005, AND 2006
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 9,882,433 | $ | 15,680,691 | $ | 16,020,932 | ||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 5,170,259 | 3,551,288 | 4,081,310 | |||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 1,078,444 | 2,712,762 | 769,906 | |||||||||||
Impairment of goodwill | — | 361,264 | — | |||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 2,582,423 | — | 3,635,149 | |||||||||||
Tax benefit associated with exercise of stock options | 49,752 | 561,476 | (1,236,069 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment | 1,659,351 | 1,577,363 | 15,335 | |||||||||||
Decrease (increase) in deferred tax benefit | (1,683,615 | ) | (371,523 | ) | 811,616 | |||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable | (4,554,478 | ) | (4,797,889 | ) | 3,869,706 | |||||||||
Increase in other receivables and prepaid expenses | (428,234 | ) | (339,760 | ) | (1,170,752 | ) | ||||||||
Increase in other assets | (408 | ) | (77,927 | ) | (419,460 | ) | ||||||||
Increase in deferred revenue | 14,673,483 | 7,747,875 | 5,098,122 | |||||||||||
(Decrease) increase in deferred rent | (24,918 | ) | 894,492 | (157,412 | ) | |||||||||
(Increase) decrease in income taxes receivable | 1,301,587 | (1,717,215 | ) | 531,657 | ||||||||||
Increase in trade accounts payable | 197,999 | 843,273 | 1,771,081 | |||||||||||
Increase in other accrued expenses | 1,211,221 | 3,408,705 | 2,460,798 | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 31,115,299 | 30,034,875 | 36,081,919 | |||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment | (4,236,741 | ) | (6,217,097 | ) | (3,724,295 | ) | ||||||||
Acquisitions | (200,000 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Purchase of investments | (89,046,870 | ) | (86,466,014 | ) | (70,755,131 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of investments | 66,648,674 | 63,534,082 | 72,169,237 | |||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (26,834,937 | ) | (29,149,029 | ) | (2,310,189 | ) | ||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 121,993,003 | — | — | |||||||||||
Costs associated with issuance of common stock | (727,493 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Excess tax benefit associated with exercise of stock options | — | — | 1,236,069 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 1,857,437 | 833,120 | 254,681 | |||||||||||
Repurchase of stock | (123,085,829 | ) | (2,503,086 | ) | (9,017,794 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | 37,118 | (1,669,966 | ) | (7,527,044 | ) | |||||||||
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH |
89,716 |
(291,426 |
) |
102,428 |
||||||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
4,407,196 |
(1,075,546 |
) |
26,347,114 |
||||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — Beginning of year |
7,634,424 |
12,041,620 |
10,966,074 |
|||||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — End of year |
$ |
12,041,620 |
$ |
10,966,074 |
$ |
37,313,188 |
||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Cash paid for taxes | $ | 161,500 | $ | 10,136,316 | $ | 8,236,225 | ||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-32
RISKMETRICS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2005, AND 2006
1. BUSINESS DESCRIPTION
RiskMetrics Group, Inc. (the "Company"), incorporated in Delaware, is a leading provider of multi-asset, position-based risk and wealth management solutions. The Company's solutions enable its clients to provide greater transparency to their internal and external constituencies, satisfy regulatory and reporting requirements and make more informed investment decisions.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation — The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned-subsidiaries, RiskMetrics (UK) Limited, RiskMetrics (Singapore) Pte Ltd, RiskMetrics Group, KK (Japan), and Arrakis, Inc. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Management Estimates and Assumptions — The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted within the United States of America require management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Stock Split — In May 2007, the Company completed a 2.5 to 1 stock split. All share amounts reflected herein have been adjusted to reflect the impact of such split.
Foreign Currency Translation — Assets and liabilities of foreign entities have been translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Results of operations of foreign entities are translated using the exchange rates prevailing throughout the year. Local currencies are considered the functional currencies of the Company's foreign operating entities. Assets and liabilities are translated using end of period exchange rates; revenues, expenses, and cash flows are translated using average rates of exchange. These currency translation effects are accumulated as part of the other comprehensive loss account in the stockholders' equity section of the balance sheet. Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions are included in the consolidated statements of income. Translation gains and losses related to long-term and permanently invested intercompany balances are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company does not engage in foreign currency hedging or other derivative financial instruments.
Cash and Cash Equivalents — The Company considers all highly liquid securities with original maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Investments — The Company classifies all of its short-term investments as "available-for-sale" and has reported the portfolio at fair value, with net unrealized gains and losses included as part of the other comprehensive loss account in the stockholders' equity section of the balance sheet. Gross realized gains and losses are calculated based upon the specific cost of the investments sold and are recognized in other income in the consolidated statements of income.
Management periodically reviews securities in its portfolio to determine whether any have become other-than-temporarily impaired. Securities are screened to identify those whose market value has
F-33
declined, as measured against criteria established by the Company. The Company considers relevant facts and circumstances surrounding individual securities, such as:
Based on assessment, management has concluded that none of the investments have been other than temporarily impaired
Other Receivables and Prepaid Expenses — Other receivables and prepaid expenses consist principally of prepaid operating and administrative expenses. These amounts are expected to be discharged within one year.
Property and Equipment and Related Depreciation and Amortization — Property and equipment are stated at cost at the date of acquisition. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the depreciable assets. Amortization of leasehold improvements is calculated using the straight-line method over the shorter of the life of the asset or the term of the related lease. Improvements are capitalized, while repair and maintenance costs are charged to operations as incurred.
Comprehensive Income — Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for reporting and displaying of comprehensive income and its components (revenue, expenses, gains and losses) in a full set of general-purpose financial statements. The components of other comprehensive loss consist of foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on investments classified as available-for-sale.
The following table is a reconciliation of the Company's net income to comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006, respectively:
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net Income | $ | 9,882,433 | $ | 15,680,691 | $ | 16,020,932 | ||||
Other Comprehensive Income: | ||||||||||
Change in unrealized loss on investments | (39,601 | ) | (89,577 | ) | 188,894 | |||||
Foreign currency translation | 45,441 | (286,915 | ) | (90,218 | ) | |||||
Comprehensive income | 9,888,273 | 15,304,199 | 16,119,608 | |||||||
Revenue Recognition — The majority of the Company's revenues are generated from contracted annual subscriptions, for which the Company receives licensing fees from clients who utilize the Company's products and services. Revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the licensed service subscription, which is typically one to three years.
Subscription revenue is recognized in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 104, Revenue Recognition, since the Company provides its
F-34
application as a service. Ongoing customer support and the right to unspecified upgrades in analytics, on a when-and-if needed basis are included as part of the subscription and are not separate components in the contract. The Company also recognizes revenue on software sales in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position ("SOP") No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended by SOP No. 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions.
Revenue is recognized when all of the following conditions are met:
In situations where contracts include client acceptance provisions, the Company does not recognize revenue until such time as the client has confirmed its acceptance. Amounts that have been invoiced are recorded in accounts receivable and in deferred revenue or revenue, depending on whether the revenue recognition criteria have been met. Some of the Company's subscription contracts include automatic renewal provisions under existing contract terms. These amounts are accumulated in unbilled receivables until invoiced. Reserves for possible losses on subscription services, if any, are recognized when determined.
Deferred Revenue — Deferred revenue primarily consists of payments received in advance of revenue recognition from the Company's subscription service described above and is recognized as revenue recognition criteria are met. The Company generally invoices its customers in annual or quarterly installments. Accordingly, the deferred revenue balance does not represent the total contract value of annual or multi-year, non-cancelable subscription agreements.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments — The carrying value of the Company's short-term instruments, including cash, accounts receivable, short-term investments, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximates their fair value due to the short-term nature of these items.
Concentration of Risk — The Company's customers are primarily commercial organizations headquartered in the United States, Europe, and Asia.
Accounts receivable are generally unsecured. Accounts receivable are due in accordance with payment terms included in contracts negotiated with customers. Amounts due from customers are stated net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts that are outstanding longer than the contracted payment terms are considered past due. The Company determines its allowance for doubtful accounts by considering a number of factors, including the length of time accounts are past due, the customer's current ability to pay its obligations to the Company, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. The Company writes-off accounts receivable when they are deemed uncollectible.
During the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006, one customer comprised 18.1%, 13.9%, 4.0% and of revenues, respectively.
F-35
Treasury Stock — The Company accounts for treasury stock under the par value method. The excess of the repurchase price over cost is charged to accumulated deficit, with the difference charged to treasury stock, at par, and additional paid-in capital.
Cost of Revenues — Cost of revenues is comprised of all direct costs associated with the production of revenues including compensation and compensation related costs, employee benefit expenses, employee hiring costs, third-party contract services related to production of revenues, an allocation of occupancy and telecommunication costs which is determined on a head-count basis, web hosting expense and data.
Research and Development — Research and development expenditures are charged to operations as incurred and include costs related to application, infrastructure, analytics, and database and product development. Costs in this area consist primarily of staff compensation costs and related expenses and consultant expenses.
Software Development Costs — In accordance with SFAS No. 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed, the Company capitalizes certain software development costs once technological feasibility is established. To date, the establishment of technological feasibility of the Company's products and general release has substantially coincided. As a result, the Company has not capitalized any internal software development costs since costs qualifying for such capitalization have not been significant.
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment — Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment includes depreciation of software, computer and related equipment, furniture and fixtures and telecommunications equipment, which is recorded over the respective useful life of the related asset. Depreciation also includes the amortization of leasehold improvements which are amortized over the shorter of the terms of the lease or the assets' useful life and amortization of capitalized software costs. While both leasehold improvements and capitalized software costs are amortized, they are included in the depreciation line item in order to segregate amortization of intangibles which have been acquired from business acquisitions.
Amortization of intangible assets — Amortization of intangible assets includes the amortization of definite life intangibles such as acquired technology, contracts, customer relationships, certain trade names, license agreements and non-compete agreements acquired during business acquisitions and are amortized over their estimated useful lives.
Income Taxes — The Company follows SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The Company records income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. To the extent needed, the Company records valuation allowances against its deferred tax assets, if it determines it is not more likely than not that the assets will be utilized in the future.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — The Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment,("SFAS 123(R)") as of January 1, 2006. The new pronouncement replaces the existing requirements under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation to Employees ("APB 25"). According to SFAS 123(R), all forms of share-based payments to employees, including employee stock options and employee stock purchase plans, would be treated the same as any other form of compensation by recognizing the related cost in the statement of income. This
F-36
pronouncement eliminates the ability to account for stock-based compensation transactions using APB 25, and generally would require that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value method. For privately held companies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") has determined that SFAS 123(R) is effective for awards and stock options granted, modified or settled in cash in interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) utilizing the modified prospective transition method which would necessitate the Company to recognize compensation cost for the fair value of new awards granted, modified or settled after the effective date of SFAS 123(R). In addition, the measurement of compensation cost for awards that are not fully vested as of the effective date of the SFAS 123(R) would be based on the same estimate that the Company used to previously value its grants under SFAS 123.
Under SFAS 123(R), stock-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award, and the cost is recognized as expense ratably over the award's vesting period. The Company measures the fair value of stock options on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
Determining the fair value of stock options required the Company to make several estimates, including the volatility of its stock price, the expected life of the option, and interest rates. Since the Company is not currently a publicly traded company, the Company has limited historical information on the price of its stock as well as employees' stock option exercise behavior. Because of this limitation, the Company cannot rely on its historical experience alone to develop assumptions for stock price volatility and the expected life of its options. The Company estimated stock-price volatility with reference to a peer group of companies. Determining the companies to include in this peer group involves judgment. The use of different assumptions in the Black-Scholes model would result in different amounts of stock-based compensation expense. The expected life of the options is based on internal studies of historical experience and projected exercise behavior of employees based on the Company's future prospects. The Company utilizes a risk-free interest rate, which is based on the yield of U.S. zero coupon securities with a maturity equal to the expected life of the options. The Company has not and does not expect to pay dividends on its common shares.
Under SFAS 123(R), the Company is required to estimate expected forfeitures of stock-based awards at the grant date and recognize compensation cost only for those awards expected to vest. The forfeiture assumption is ultimately adjusted to the actual forfeiture rate. Therefore, changes in the forfeiture assumptions may impact the total amount of expense ultimately recognized over the vesting period. Estimated forfeitures will be reassessed in subsequent periods and may change based on new facts and circumstances. The adoption of SFAS 123(R) did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company recognized compensation for unvested awards under the graded vesting method, and the Company will continue to do so in all grants made prior to January 1, 2006. For all grants made subsequent to January 1, 2006, the Company will recognize compensation cost under the straight-line method.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company accounted for its employee stock-based transactions under APB 25 and followed the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure. The following table illustrates the effect on net
F-37
income had the Company applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to stock-based employee compensation prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R):
|
2004 |
2005 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net income, as reported | $ | 9,882,433 | $ | 15,680,691 | |||
Add: stock-based compensation expense, net of tax effect, included in reported net income | 2,275,115 | — | |||||
Deduct: total stock-based compensation expense, net of tax effect, determined under fair value based method for all awards | (4,500,212 | ) | (1,864,770 | ) | |||
Pro forma net income | $ | 7,657,336 | $ | 13,815,921 | |||
The actual income tax benefit recorded relating to the exercise of stock options was $1,236,069 for the year ended December 31, 2006 and is classified as a financing cash inflow in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company presented all tax benefits related to stock based compensation as operating cash inflow. The actual income tax benefit recorded relating to the exercise of stock options was $49,752 and $561,476 for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively.
Goodwill and Intangibles — Goodwill consists of the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets of businesses acquired. The Company follows SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, under which goodwill is no longer amortized. Instead, goodwill is evaluated for impairment using a two-step process that is performed at least annually on October 1 of each year, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. The first step is a comparison of the fair value of an internal reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered impaired and the second step is unnecessary. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a second test is performed to measure the amount of impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the goodwill to a determination of the implied value of the goodwill. If the carrying amount of the goodwill is greater that the implied value, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference. The implied value of the goodwill is determined as of the test date by performing a purchase price allocation, as if the reporting unit had just been acquired, using currently estimated fair values of the individual assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, together with an estimate of the fair value of the reporting unit taken as a whole. The estimate of the fair value of the reporting unit is based upon information available regarding prices of similar groups of assets, or other valuation techniques including present value techniques based upon estimates of future cash flow.
Intangible assets, including contracts and technology, are amortized using a method which reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the related intangible asset are consumed or used up. Upon the adoption of SFAS 142, intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful lives, such as trade names, are not amortized and are subject to annual impairment tests or whenever events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. An impairment exists if the carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value. For other intangible assets subject to amortization, an impairment is recognized if the carrying amount is not recoverable and the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the intangible asset.
F-38
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets — The Company follows SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Long-lived assets of the Company (other than deferred tax assets) including equipment, software development and leasehold improvement, trademarks, and furniture and fixtures are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the net carrying amount may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.
Effects of Recently Issued Accounting Standards — In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments, which amends SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and SFAS 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. SFAS 155 provides, among other things, that (i) for embedded derivatives which would otherwise be required to be bifurcated from their host contracts and accounted for at fair value in accordance with SFAS 133, an entity may make an irrevocable election, on an instrument-by-instrument basis, to measure the hybrid financial instrument at fair value in its entirety, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings and (ii) concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not considered embedded derivatives. SFAS 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired, issued, or subject to remeasurement after January 1, 2007. The adoption of SFAS 155 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes ("FIN 48"). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures, and transitions. The Company will adopt FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007 and is currently evaluating the impact that adopting FIN 48 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS 157 are effective for the Company beginning after January 1, 2008. The Company has not completed its assessment of the impact of SFAS 157 on its financial statements following adoption.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 ("SFAS 159"), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, providing companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. SFAS 159's objective is to reduce both complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. Accounting principles generally accepted within the United States have required different measurement attributes for different assets and liabilities that can create artificial volatility in earnings. SFAS 159 helps to mitigate this type of accounting-induced volatility by enabling companies to report related assets and liabilities at fair value, which would likely reduce the need for companies to comply with detailed rules for hedge accounting. SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of asset and liabilities.
F-39
SFAS 159 requires companies to provide additional information that will help investors and other users of financial statements to more easily understand the effect of the Company's choice to use fair value on its earnings. It also requires entities to display the fair value of these assets and liabilities for which the Company has chosen to use fair value on the face of the balance sheet. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 159 on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulleting No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements ("SAB 108"). SAB 108 addresses how the effects of prior year uncorrected misstatements should be considered when quantifying misstatements in current year financial statements. SAB 108 requires companies to quantify misstatements using both an income statement (rollover) approach and a balance sheet (iron curtain) approach in assessing materiality in light of quantitative and qualitative factors. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending on or after November 15, 2006. Since the Company does not have any unrecognized prior years or current year misstatements SAB 108 had no impact with the Company.
3. INVESTMENTS
Investments as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized Holding |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 |
Market Value |
|
|||||||||||
Cost |
Gains |
Losses |
|||||||||||
Fixed income mutual funds | $ | 4,444,807 | $ | 4,609,083 | $ | — | $ | (164,276 | ) | ||||
Auction securities | 13,300,000 | 13,300,000 | — | — | |||||||||
Corporate bonds | 2,476,016 | 2,505,023 | — | (29,007 | ) | ||||||||
Municipal bonds | 49,075,000 | 49,075,000 | — | — | |||||||||
$ | 69,295,823 | $ | 69,489,106 | $ | — | $ | (193,283 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized Holding |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006 |
Market Value |
|
|||||||||||
Cost |
Gains |
Losses |
|||||||||||
Fixed income mutual funds | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
Auction securities | 26,800,000 | 26,800,000 | — | — | |||||||||
Corporate bonds | 745,611 | 750,000 | — | (4,389 | ) | ||||||||
Municipal bonds | 40,525,000 | 40,525,000 | — | — | |||||||||
$ | 68,070,611 | $ | 68,075,000 | $ | — | $ | (4,389 | ) | |||||
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006, the Company recognized long-term losses on investments of $74,854, $0, and $178,705, respectively and short-term losses on investments of $3,470, $0, and $0, respectively which are included within interest, dividend and investment income on the statement of income. No long-term or short-term gains on investments occurred in either 2004, 2005, or 2006. The net unrealized holding loss on investments, reported as a component of other comprehensive loss in the stockholders' equity section of the balance sheet, was a loss of $103,706, $193,283 and $4,389 at December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
F-40
4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 consist of the following:
|
Estimated Useful Life |
2005 |
2006 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cost: | ||||||||||
Hardware | 3 years | $ | 9,300,626 | $ | 12,232,462 | |||||
Software | 4 years | 3,657,344 | 4,048,422 | |||||||
Telecommunications equipment | 5 years | 554,344 | 555,638 | |||||||
Furniture and fixtures | 7 years | 584,887 | 752,024 | |||||||
Leasehold improvements | Shorter of the term of the lease or life of the asset |
3,037,401 | 3,365,644 | |||||||
17,134,602 | 20,954,190 | |||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (8,779,417 | ) | (12,906,917 | ) | ||||||
Property and equipment — net | $ | 8,355,185 | $ | 8,047,273 | ||||||
Depreciation expense recorded for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006 was $3,995,356, $3,194,676 and $3,646,725, respectively. Amortization expense of leasehold improvements for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 was $1,174,903, $356,612 and $434,585, respectively.
During 2004, a lease for one of the Company's offices expired and the Company entered into a lease and moved to a new space. In relation to this move, the Company disposed of certain hardware and furniture that had become obsolete. This resulted in a loss on disposal of approximately $1.5 million. Throughout 2004, certain other assets were disposed of which resulted in losses of approximately $160 thousand.
In 2004, as part of its ongoing evaluation of fixed assets, the Company changed the estimated useful life of its hardware from five years to three years. This resulted in additional depreciation expense of $1.2 million in 2004.
During 2005, leases for two of the Company's offices were terminated and the Company relocated and entered into new leases. In relation to these moves, the remaining value of leasehold improvements from the terminated offices was written off and the Company disposed of certain hardware and furniture that had become obsolete. The assets written off had an original cost of $5.7 million and this resulted in loss on disposal of approximately $1.6 million.
F-41
5. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL
Intangible assets as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 consist of the following:
|
|
2005 |
2006 |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Useful Lives |
Gross |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net |
Gross |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net |
|||||||||||||
Technology | 3 yrs. | $ | 2,397,052 | $ | (2,028,865 | ) | $ | 368,187 | $ | 2,397,052 | $ | (2,397,052 | ) | $ | — | |||||
Contracts | 3 yrs. | 2,822,892 | (2,421,173 | ) | 401,719 | 2,822,892 | (2,822,892 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 5,219,944 | $ | (4,450,038 | ) | $ | 769,906 | $ | 5,219,944 | $ | (5,219,944 | ) | $ | — | ||||||
Amortization expense of intangibles assets for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006, was $1,078,444, $2,712,762, and $769,906, respectively, and is included in amortization on the consolidated statements of income.
Pursuant to an acquisition of JP Morgan Advisory, Inc. on March 31, 2003, the Company agreed to provide wealth management services to JP Morgan Chase under a 3-year MSPA, which contained a renewal for an additional 2-year period. The fair value of the service provider agreement was determined by management based on internal analysis, which was reviewed by an independent appraiser, was $2.8 million, with an estimated useful life of five years. During February 2005, the Company was notified that a 3-year Master Service Provider Agreement that was executed as part of the acquisition of JP Morgan Advisory, Inc. on March 31, 2003, would not be renewed upon its termination date of March 31, 2006. The contract was subsequently extended through April, 30 2006. Based upon the revised downward revenue forecast, and no intention to attract other customers or derive cash flows from assets acquired, the Company determined that the carrying value of goodwill was impaired and wrote off the goodwill of $361,264. As a result, beginning in March 2005, the Company accelerated the amortization of the agreement to fully amortize the intangible asset relating to contracts over its remaining useful life through March 2006. As part of the same acquisition, the Company acquired technology necessary to deliver services set forth under the MSPA. The fair value of the related technology, which was determined by management with support from an independent appraiser, was $2.2 million, with an estimated useful life of 7 years. The use of this technology was not redeployed by the Company in any other lines of business and was limited to delivering services under the MSPA. Accordingly, the Company also accelerated the amortization of the technology to amortize this intangible over its remaining useful life through April 2006. The impact of the revised useful lives of these two intangible assets resulted in an increase in amortization expense and a decrease in net income of approximately $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
F-42
6. ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued expenses as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 consist of the following:
|
2005 |
2006 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accrued compensation and related tax | $ | 12,005,784 | $ | 15,336,021 | ||
Accrued data expense | 742,918 | 861,241 | ||||
Accrued travel and entertainment | 127,897 | 155,658 | ||||
Accrued professional fees | 250,225 | 191,280 | ||||
Current portion of deferred rent | 216,484 | 222,771 | ||||
Other accrued expenses | 1,752,430 | 1,028,187 | ||||
$ | 15,095,738 | $ | 17,795,158 | |||
7. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
The following table summarizes revenue for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006 on a percentage basis by geographic region, based on the country in which the customer is located:
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Americas | 62 | % | 59 | % | 52 | % | |
EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) | 28 | 32 | 39 | ||||
Asia | 10 | 9 | 9 | ||||
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||
The Company operates in one reportable segment, Risk. Risk provides financial risk management expertise to the financial community through research, analytics, data and other products and services. Products offered at Risk generally have similar economic characteristics and are of similar product nature for the most part. Wealth Management, a small product line within Risk, is the only one that is dissimilar to the other financial risk management software products made by the Company in that Wealth Management involves significant customization and targets at the retail industry. Nevertheless, Wealth Management is an integral part of Risk. Management has always evaluated business performance of Risk as a whole, and intends to continue to do so in the future. Given the current business and financial information available about Risk (including Wealth Management) for the chief operating decision maker to evaluate business performance and allocate resources, and the way the business is managed, information about all Risk products is disclosed altogether as a separate, reportable segment. Long-lived assets outside the United States are not significant.
F-43
8. INCOME TAXES
The components of the tax (benefit) provision for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006 are as follows:
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Federal: | |||||||||||
Current | $ | (301,227 | ) | $ | 4,965,934 | $ | 4,976,392 | ||||
Deferred | (1,487,751 | ) | 284,480 | 341,316 | |||||||
(1,788,978 | ) | 5,250,414 | 5,317,708 | ||||||||
State: |
|||||||||||
Current | 936,477 | 2,673,269 | 1,856,851 | ||||||||
Deferred | (195,865 | ) | (402,613 | ) | 128,196 | ||||||
740,612 | 2,270,656 | 1,985,047 | |||||||||
Foreign: |
|||||||||||
Current | — | 119,751 | 959,088 | ||||||||
Deferred | — | (1,050 | ) | (61,898 | ) | ||||||
— | 118,701 | 897,190 | |||||||||
Total | $ | (1,048,366 | ) | $ | 7,639,771 | $ | 8,199,945 | ||||
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 consist of the following:
|
2005 |
2006 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current: | |||||||||
Accounts receivable | $ | 132,716 | $ | 111,479 | |||||
Prepaid expenses | (82,247 | ) | (14,095 | ) | |||||
Domestic production activity deduction | — | (18,573 | ) | ||||||
Net current deferred tax asset | 50,469 | 78,811 | |||||||
Long-term: |
|||||||||
Intangibles | 164,600 | — | |||||||
Property and equipment | 984,366 | (275,689 | ) | ||||||
Deferred rent | 562,059 | 485,296 | |||||||
Deferred revenue | 293,644 | 349,494 | |||||||
Capital loss | — | 75,388 | |||||||
Stock option deduction | — | 533,420 | |||||||
Net long-term deferred tax asset | 2,004,669 | 1,167,909 | |||||||
Net deferred tax asset | $ | 2,055,138 | $ | 1,246,720 | |||||
F-44
The expected tax benefit calculated at the statutory federal rate differs from the actual (benefit) provision for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006 is as follows:
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tax provision, at U.S. Federal statutory tax rate | $ | 3,003,583 | $ | 7,928,957 | $ | 8,477,307 | ||||
State and local income taxes, net of U.S. federal benefit | 488,804 | 1,498,633 | 1,290,281 | |||||||
Meals and entertainment | 97,288 | 49,152 | 71,071 | |||||||
Nontaxable interest and dividends | — | (173,674 | ) | (732,619 | ) | |||||
Non-deductible stock option expense under SFAS 123(R) | — | — | 831,933 | |||||||
AMT credit | (109,127 | ) | — | — | ||||||
Foreign tax credit | (725,439 | ) | (296,608 | ) | (88,440 | ) | ||||
Research and development credit | (1,781,798 | ) | (450,000 | ) | (685,104 | ) | ||||
State and local credits | — | — | (370,000 | ) | ||||||
U.K. unrealized translation gain | — | 328,964 | (236,948 | ) | ||||||
Rate differential on foreign earnings | — | (112,394 | ) | (102,433 | ) | |||||
Section 199 deduction | — | — | (398,384 | ) | ||||||
Other | (33,156 | ) | (52,660 | ) | 143,281 | |||||
Change in valuation allowance | (1,988,521 | ) | (1,080,599 | ) | — | |||||
Net tax provision (benefit) | $ | (1,048,366 | ) | $ | 7,639,771 | $ | 8,199,945 | |||
At December 31, 2004, the Company recorded a valuation allowance of approximately $1,081,000 against net deferred tax assets since the Company could not be assured, that more likely than not, such amounts would be realized. The Company also had foreign net operating losses of approximately $3,632,000, which were available for carryforward indefinitely and business credit carryforwards of approximately $831,000 available through 2024 at December 31, 2004. In 2004, the Company was able to utilize approximately $2 million of net operating losses and thus reduced its valuation allowance by such amount in 2004.
In 2005, the Company was able to utilize all net operating loss and business credit carryforwards. As a result, no such carryforwards remained as of December 31, 2005. As a result, the valuation allowance against such carryforwards has been eliminated as of December 31, 2005.
F-45
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company is committed to unrelated parties for the rental of office space under operating leases. Minimum annual lease payments with respect to the leases are as follows:
Years Ending December 31, |
|
||
---|---|---|---|
2007 | $ | 2,089,992 | |
2008 | 1,866,789 | ||
2009 | 1,647,152 | ||
2010 | 1,286,474 | ||
2011 | 950,312 | ||
Thereafter | 581,850 | ||
Total | $ | 8,422,569 | |
On March 16, 2005, the Company and the landlord of its primary operating facility agreed to an early termination of the existing lease agreement. As a result, the Company paid the landlord $1,650,000. Under the terms of the Company's lease for its primary operating facility, it was not obligated to pay rent for two years from January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2000. The free rent period resulted in a deferred rent payable balance of $440,578 at the date of the early termination of the lease. The net of $1,209,422 has been recorded as additional rent expense at the date of the early termination.
On March 1, 2005, the Company entered into a new lease for its primary operating facility that expires in August 2012. Under the terms of this lease, the Company was not obligated to pay rent for a period of six months and was paid a sum of $1,034,400 as an inducement to sign the lease. These two factors resulted in a deferred rent balance of $1,332,296 and $1,131,194 as of December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively, of which the current portion of $201,102 is included within accrued expenses on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet for both years. As of December 31, 2005 and 2006, the deferred rent balance from all other locations was $15,382 and $62,752, respectively, of which $15,382 and $21,669, respectively, was current. Such deferred rent balance will be recognized as additional rent expense over the life of the lease.
Rent expense on leases was $2,366,244, $4,199,217 and $1,804,923 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively. The Company had collateralized its obligations to a lessor by pledging $347,834 and $425,937 in cash deposits classified as deposits on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
Data Agreements — In 1998, the Company entered into a data licensing agreement with Reuters America, Inc. ("Reuters"), whereby, it received a perpetual license to use and/or modify the Reuters data content for its own internal use. In consideration of this license, the Company was obligated to pay to Reuters a sum equal to 25% of its revenue over $50,000,000 in respect of the RMG Data Service (as defined in the agreement) in any year (or pro rata per part year) it achieved such amount. In accordance with the provisions of the licensing agreement, the Company did not pay a licensing fee for data for the year ended December 31, 2004.
On January 6, 2004, the Company and Reuters agreed that in exchange for the current data license which gave the Company unrestricted use of most of Reuters data for both internal use and redistribution at no cost to the Company, it would replace it with an arms-length, negotiated,
F-46
commercial data license with data rates comparable to that which the Company currently pays to unrelated parties. In addition, Reuters returned to the Company 7,812,500 shares of the Company's Senior Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A-2, par value $.01. Simultaneously with the return of shares, the Company entered into a Master Services Agreement ("MSA") with Reuters. The MSA is for a term of 36 months from the date signed, with automatic annual renewals unless either party gives cancellation notice within one year of expiration. The Company signed order forms aggregating to fees of approximately $1.75 million per year for each of the three years in the MSA term. Under the MSA and order forms, Reuters will provide technology, infrastructure, datasets, and the associated internal usage and redistribution rights for the entire spectrum of data and technology offered by Reuters. In January 2007, the Company reached an agreement with Reuters to extend this arrangement until December 31, 2009.
Since Reuters was a shareholder of the Company, the Company has accounted for these transactions with Reuters as a treasury stock transaction. A value of $2.5 million has been estimated by the Company as the present value of the future costs associated with the MSA. Such amount, net of related tax of $997,828, has been recorded as a component of stockholders' equity.
In addition, the Company has entered into agreements with other vendors to supply the Company with data, which have terms that extend through 2010. The aggregate minimum payments with respect to these data agreements as of December 31, 2006, are as follows:
Years Ending December 31, |
|
||
---|---|---|---|
2007 | $ | 6,181,273 | |
2008 | 3,562,086 | ||
2009 | 2,985,937 | ||
2010 | 780,000 | ||
Total | $ | 13,509,296 | |
Contingencies — The Company has no lawsuits against it nor has the Company initiated any against any others. It is believed that any potential liability arising from unknown actions or claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity.
10. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
The authorized capital stock of the Company consists of 87,500,000 shares of common stock, which have a stated par value of $.01 per share. Prior to June 2004, the Company also had authorized 42,500,000 shares of senior convertible preferred stock and 7,500,000 shares of junior convertible preferred stock, each with a stated par value of $.01 per share. Each series of preferred stock maintained certain preferential voting rights unique to its series or class and not shared by common stockholders, including, but not limited to, the right of appointing board designees and approving certain extraordinary corporate transactions. In addition, preferred stockholders maintained customary preemptive rights and antidilution protection.
F-47
The senior convertible preferred had a priority claim to the junior convertible preferred in the event of a liquidation event. They also had certain priority rights to purchase new and existing stock. There are no rights to any dividends by any class of stock.
The senior convertible preferred stock and junior convertible preferred stock were convertible at the option of the holder, in whole or in part, at any time after the date of issuance into common stock by dividing the original price in effect at issuance by the Conversion Price. The Conversion Price per share was the original convertible preferred stock issue price, subject to adjustment in the event of certain diluting issues as further described in the agreement relating to the purchase of the senior and junior convertible preferred stock.
Effective in 2000, the Company began repurchasing shares of its common stock from employees and holds these repurchased shares as treasury stock. During 2005, 555,455 shares were repurchased for a total cost of $2,503,086, and during 2006, 1,432,610 shares were repurchased for a total cost of $9,017,794, which is included in stockholders' equity on the consolidated balance sheets.
On June 14, 2004, the Company raised $121,993,003 in a private placement through the sale of 32,531,467 shares of common stock, for a purchase price of $3.75 per share, to a primarily new investor group. As a result of the private placement, the new investor group now controls three out of seven of the Company's board of director seats. Immediately following the closing of the private placement, the Company repurchased 6,593,968 shares of issued and outstanding shares of common stock, 4,650,000 shares of junior convertible preferred stock, and 21,287,500 shares of senior convertible preferred stock for an aggregate of $121,993,003. Through the ordinary course of business and the repurchase that occurred subsequent to the private placement, the Company repurchased shares and options for a combined total cost of $123,208,164 of which $123,085,829 is included in stockholders' equity on the balance sheet, with the difference of $122,335, a component of stock compensation expense. In addition, two holders of senior convertible preferred stock exchanged their 18,000 shares held for an equivalent number of common shares. As a result of and immediately following the consummation of the private placement and buyback, the Company has only one class of capital stock issued and outstanding, its common stock.
Included in the 2004 common stock repurchase noted above, 1,151,055 shares were obtained by employees through an exercise of options they owned. Since the shares were not held for at least six months, the Company recorded a compensation charge of $2,582,423 which represents the difference between the $3.75 fair value of the shares and the amount received from the employee immediately prior to the repurchase.
11. STOCK OPTION PLANS
During 2000, the Company's Board of Directors adopted a Stock Option Plan (the "2000 Plan") that provided for the grant of options to employees, consultants, and non-employee directors to purchase common stock, which vest over a one to four year period and have a ten-year contractual term. The maximum number of shares of the Company's common stock available for issuance under the 2000 Plan was 12,500,000 and no more than 4,000,000 shares were allowed to be issued in any calendar year. Subsequent to the 2004 private placement, the Company retired the 2000 Plan and adopted a new option plan (the "2004 Plan"). As of December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively, 7,660,145 and 7,003,978 of options issued under the 2000 Plan remain outstanding.
F-48
The 2004 Plan provides for the grant of options to employees, consultants, and non-employee directors to purchase common stock, which vest over a three to four year period and have a ten-year contractual term. To satisfy options granted under the Plan, the Company may make common stock available from authorized but unissued shares or shares held in treasury by the Company. The maximum number of shares of the Company's common stock available for issuance under the 2004 Plan is 7,500,000. Shares available for future grants under the 2004 Plan totaled 3,865,000 and 2,468,750 as of December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
Summarized information relative to the Company's stock option plans is as follows:
|
Number of Shares |
Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outstanding — January 1, 2004 | 10,352,837 | $ | 1.91 | |||
Granted |
1,521,250 |
4.28 |
||||
Exercised | (1,229,258 | ) | 1.51 | |||
Forfeited | (900,715 | ) | 2.02 | |||
Outstanding — December 31, 2004 |
9,744,114 |
2.32 |
||||
Granted |
2,423,750 |
6.45 |
||||
Exercised | (460,950 | ) | 1.81 | |||
Forfeited | (411,813 | ) | 3.00 | |||
Outstanding — December 31, 2005 |
11,295,101 |
3.20 |
||||
Granted |
1,530,625 |
12.98 |
||||
Exercised | (142,390 | ) | 1.79 | |||
Forfeited | (648,144 | ) | 2.69 | |||
Outstanding — December 31, 2006 |
12,035,192 |
$ |
4.49 |
|||
F-49
The Company's stock options outstanding at December 31, 2006 were as follows:
|
Outstanding Options |
Options Exercisable |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exercise Prices |
Number of Options |
Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (In Years) |
Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
Number of Options |
Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
||||||||
$ | 1.20 | 1,196,699 | 4.07 | $ | 1.20 | 1,196,699 | $ | 1.20 | |||||
2.00 | 3,691,531 | 5.79 | 2.00 | 3,587,787 | 2.00 | ||||||||
2.40 | 2,115,748 | 7.01 | 2.40 | 1,805,960 | 2.40 | ||||||||
3.75 | 375,000 | 7.76 | 3.75 | 211,461 | 3.75 | ||||||||
4.80 | 1,374,373 | 8.04 | 4.80 | 551,564 | 4.80 | ||||||||
6.00 | 332,500 | 8.59 | 6.00 | 90,940 | 6.00 | ||||||||
7.20 | 1,854,986 | 9.08 | 7.20 | 358,034 | 7.20 | ||||||||
15.29 | 1,094,355 | 10.00 | 15.29 | — | 15.29 | ||||||||
12,035,192 | 7.12 | $ | 4.49 | 7,802,445 | $ | 2.50 | |||||||
The derived fair value of the common shares underlying the options was determined based on an internal valuation prepared by management, with the appropriate level of competency, and reviewed by the Board of Directors, using generally accepted valuation methodologies. Management applied the guideline companies approach which incorporates certain assumptions, including multiples of EBITDA and the market performance of comparable listed companies, as well as the financial results and growth trends of the Company, to derive the total equity value of the Company. The Company has granted options to employees at the estimated fair value without ascribing any discount.
As of December 31, 2005 and 2006, 6,436,053 and 7,802,450 of the outstanding options are vested and exercisable at the weighted-average exercisable price of $2.03 and $2.50, respectively. Of the unvested options as of December 31, 2006, 3,809,522 are expected to vest in the future.
The fair value of stock options at date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model utilizing the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
||||
Risk-free interest rate | 4.8 | % | 4.4 | % | 4.7 | % | |
Expected term (in years) | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | ||||
Expected stock price volatility | 35 | % | 31 | % | 31 | % | |
Expected dividend yield | None | None | None |
Expected volatilities are based on certain publicly traded companies that are comparable to the Company. The Company uses as estimated-average turnover for the industry within the valuation model to estimate the expected life of the options. The interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the United States Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. As required by SFAS 123(R), management made an estimate of expected forfeitures for all unvested awards and is recognizing compensation costs only for those equity awards expected to vest.
F-50
The weighted-average fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, was $1.68, $2.30 and $4.72, respectively.
As of December 31, 2006 there was approximately $8.5 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested share-based compensation awards granted under the stock option plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a period of four years. Share-based compensation was $2,582,423, $0 and $3,635,149 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 respectively. As a result of the exercise of stock options, the Company generated approximately $50,000, $561,000 and $1,236,000 of tax benefits in 2004, 2005, and 2006, respectively.
12. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The Company follows FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings per Share, in calculating earnings per share. Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income attributable to common shareholders by a diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share reflects the potential dilution that would occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock, unless they are anti-dilutive.
In computing earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, the difference between basic and diluted number of shares outstanding is as follows:
|
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
||||
Basic number of weighted-average shares outstanding | 30,379,564 | 43,496,221 | 42,655,069 | ||||
Effect of dilutive securities — | |||||||
Employee stock options | 3,363,428 | 4,916,530 | 5,308,597 | ||||
Convertible preferred shares | 16,070,548 | — | — | ||||
Diluted number of weighted-average shares outstanding |
49,813,540 | 48,412,751 | 47,963,666 | ||||
Options to purchase 45,219, 145,904 and 1,714,586 common shares during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006, respectively, were anti-dilutive and were therefore excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share.
13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In December 2004, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with one of its directors. The consulting agreement stated that the director would provide certain strategic advice and marketing assistance to the Company in consideration for an annual payment of $125,000. The director was paid $125,000 of cash in for 2004 and accepted options to purchase 31,250 and 18,750 shares at exercise prices per share of $7.20 and $15.29, respectively, in lieu of payment for 2006 and 2007, respectively. The Company recognized the fair value of such options of $125,000 as consulting expense in its statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006.
F-51
During 2004, the Company provided products and services in the normal course of business to certain customers who were also stockholders of the Company. During the period from January 1, 2004 to June 14, 2004, the Company recognized $8.1 million from such contracts. As of June 14, 2004, the customers ceased to be stockholders of the Company.
From 2004 to 2006, the Company had sales of its products and services to an entity founded by one of its directors, aggregating $149,000, $230,000 and $266,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
14. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Company sponsors a 401(k) plan and similar plans outside the United States where participants may elect to defer eligible compensation up to governmental limitations. The plans do not include an automatic Company contribution but the Company may contribute profit sharing amounts at its discretion. Expense related to the 401(k) and other plans was approximately $296,000, $781,000 and $680,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
15. ISS ACQUISITION
In January 2007, the Company acquired Institutional Shareholder Services Holdings, Inc. ("ISS"), for a purchase price of approximately $542.6 million in an effort to broaden the types of services it could offer its clients. Consideration paid to ISS included approximately $482.7 million in cash, 2,774,351 shares of the Company's common stock with a value of approximately $42.4 million, and 1,396,000 stock options with a value of approximately $16.3 million. ISS provides proxy research, voting recommendations, and governance advisory services to financial institutions and corporations worldwide. ISS analyzes proxy issues, issues research, and provides services in the areas of Taft-Hartley proxy research and voting, social investment proxy research, voting and portfolio screening, global proxy distribution, and securities class action services.
In conjunction with the purchase of ISS, the Company incurred debt of $425 million. The debt is comprised of a first lien term loan facility and revolving credit facility and a second lien term loan facility:
The first lien credit facility consists of a $25 million first lien revolving credit facility and a $300 million first lien term loan facility and accumulates interest, at the Company's option of: (a) the LIBOR rate plus a margin of 1.75% to 2.25% depending on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio, or (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% and (ii) Bank of America's "prime rate," plus a margin of 0.75% or 1.25% depending on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio. As of June 30, 2007, no amounts have been borrowed under the revolving credit facility. Amounts paid under the first lien term loan facility may not be re-borrowed. The maturity date for the first lien revolving credit facility and first lien term loan facility is January 2013 and January 2014, respectively.
The second lien term loan facility is for $125 million and accumulates interest based on, at the Company's option of: (a) the LIBOR rate plus a margin of 5.50%, or (b) the higher of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 5.0% and (ii) Bank of America's "prime rate," plus a margin of 4.50%. The maturity date for the second lien term loan facility is July 2014.
F-52
In addition to quarterly interest payments due the credit facilities, the Company is required to repay the principal amounts of the first lien credit facility in quarterly installments of $750,000 starting on June 30, 2007. Furthermore, starting after the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, the Company is required to make mandatory repayments equal to 50% of each year's excess cash flow, as defined in the first lien credit facility, within five days of delivery of audited financial statements. The Company is required to repay the aggregate principal remaining on the first lien term loan facility and all amounts outstanding under the second lien credit agreement on the maturity date.
The Company has guaranteed the payment and performance of the credit facilities. The credit agreements includes certain covenants related to the delivery of financial results, maintenance of properties and insurance, consolidated leverage ratio limitations and limitations of capital expenditures.
In February 2007, the Company entered into two interest-rate swap agreements to reduce interest rate risks and to manage interest expense. By entering into these agreements, the Company changes the fixed/variable interest-rate mix of its debt portfolio. The Company is party to interest-rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional principal amount of $319 million related to its existing debt. The agreements effectively convert floating-rate debt into fixed-rate debt. This reduces the Company's risk of incurring higher interest costs in periods of rising interest rates. The Company is subject to loss if the counterparties to these agreements fail to perform.
16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
CFRA Acquisition—On August 1, 2007, the Company acquired all outstanding capital stock of CFRA (Center for Financial Research & Analysis) for a purchase price of approximately $64.1 million to increase the range of specialized research products and services that the Company can offer its clients. CFRA is a leading provider of forensic accounting research, legal/regulatory risk assessment, due diligence, and educational services. The purchase price included approximately $46.6 million of cash (including liquidation of investments held by the Company) and a draw-down on the revolving line of credit for the remainder of the purchase price. CFRA had revenue and net loss of approximately $15.9 million and $0.1 million, respectively, for its last fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
Other Matter—Subsequent to the issuance of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company determined its accounting for the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) in 2006 and the related change in accounting attributable to estimated forfeitures at grant date rather than as incurred should not have resulted in the recognition of a cumulative effect change in accounting of $229,813 to its income statement, as previously reported. As a result, the Company has corrected its accounting for the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) in the accompanying 2006 consolidated financial statements. The impact on the 2006 consolidated financial statements of this correction is as follows: (a) net income decreased to $16,020,932 from $16,250,745, (b) accumulated deficit increased to $74,184,502 from $73,954,689, and (c) additional paid-in capital increased to $130,764,921 from 130,535,108. This correction had no impact on total equity, total assets or liabilities, or total cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities.
F-53
In addition, the Company determined that its presentation of the excess tax benefit associated with the exercise of stock options was incorrectly reflected within the statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006. As a result, the Company corrected its statement of cash flows for this item and for errors in the accounting for the effect of exchange rate changes on cash. The impact of these corrections to the consolidated statements of cash flows is as follows:
|
(As Previously Reported) |
(As Corrected) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year ended December 31, 2006: | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 37,555,728 | $ | 36,081,919 | ||||
Net cash (used) in investing activities | $ | (2,563,521 | ) | $ | (2,310,189 | ) | ||
Net cash (used) in financing activities | $ | (8,554,875 | ) | $ | (7,527,044 | ) | ||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | $ | (90,218 | ) | $ | 102,428 | |||
Year ended December 31, 2005: |
||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 29,896,508 | $ | 30,034,875 | ||||
Net cash (used) in investing activities | $ | (29,015,173 | ) | $ | (29,149,029 | ) | ||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | $ | (286,915 | ) | $ | (291,426 | ) | ||
Year ended December 31, 2004: |
||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 31,155,537 | $ | 31,115,299 | ||||
Net cash (used) in investing activities | $ | (26,830,600 | ) | $ | (26,834,937 | ) | ||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | $ | 45,441 | $ | 89,716 |
******
F-54
RISKMETRICS GROUP, INC.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2005, AND 2006
Schedule II — Valuation and qualifying accounts
|
December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Col. A |
Col. B |
Col. C |
Col. D |
Col. E |
|||||||||||
Description |
Balance at beginning of the period |
Charged to costs and expenses |
Charged to other accounts |
Deductions |
Balance at end of the period |
||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | |||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful receivables | $ | 233,000 | $ | 21,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 254,000 | |||||
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance | 2,975,000 | (1,894,000 | ) | — | — | 1,081,000 | |||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful receivables | 254,000 | 64,000 | — | — | 318,000 | ||||||||||
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance | 1,081,000 | (1,081,000 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
|||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful receivables | 318,000 | (48,000 | ) | (5,000 | ) | — | 265,000 | ||||||||
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance | — | — | — | — | — |
F-55
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Board
of Directors and Shareholders
Institutional Shareholder Services Holdings, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Institutional Shareholder Services Holdings, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in redeemable preferred stock and stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Institutional Shareholder Services Holdings, Inc. at December 31, 2005 and 2006, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for stock-based compensation in 2006 upon adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123(R), Shared-Based Payment.
/s/ Ernst and Young, LLP McLean, Virginia May 4, 2007 |
F-56
INSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDER SERVICES HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
December 31 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2006 |
||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 13,984,072 | $ | 15,538,410 | ||||
Restricted cash equivalents | 582,734 | 472,740 | ||||||
Trade accounts receivable, net | 21,901,013 | 30,883,386 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets | 773,770 | 1,404,503 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 676,794 | 818,141 | ||||||
Total current assets | 37,918,383 | 49,117,180 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
7,994,516 |
10,155,586 |
||||||
Intangible assets, net | 9,432,953 | 8,080,351 | ||||||
Goodwill | 28,649,850 | 32,018,788 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets | 1,991,024 | 653,700 | ||||||
Other assets | 1,848,851 | 1,801,596 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 87,835,577 | $ | 101,827,201 | ||||
Liabilities and stockholders' deficit |
||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 2,685,693 | $ | 857,193 | ||||
Accrued expenses | 10,494,022 | 12,470,910 | ||||||
Deferred revenues | 35,566,604 | 44,880,659 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations, current portion | 21,247 | 23,741 | ||||||
Deferred purchase obligation, current portion | — | 101,000 | ||||||
Notes payable under credit facility, current portion | 520,000 | 5,200,000 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 49,287,566 | 63,533,503 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations, less current portion |
57,374 |
33,633 |
||||||
Deferred purchase obligation, less current portion | — | 1,090,550 | ||||||
Notes payable under credit facility, less current portion | 51,350,000 | 39,670,000 | ||||||
Deferred rent | 1,655,423 | 1,678,187 | ||||||
Minority interest | 519,489 | — | ||||||
Redeemable Convertible Series A Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value; 35,000 shares authorized; 31,656 shares issued and outstanding; aggregate liquidation preference of $33,537,625 and $32,919,303 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively |
30,586,062 |
31,325,680 |
||||||
Stockholders' deficit: |
||||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 55,000 shares authorized; 10,322 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005 | 103 | 103 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | — | 722,968 | ||||||
Deferred stock compensation | (351,999 | ) | — | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (222,850 | ) | (84,802 | ) | ||||
Accumulated deficit | (45,045,591 | ) | (36,142,621 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders' deficit | (45,620,337 | ) | (35,504,352 | ) | ||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit | $ | 87,835,577 | $ | 101,827,201 | ||||
See accompanying notes.
F-57
INSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDER SERVICES HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
Years ended December 31 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
|||||||||
Revenues | $ | 66,554,431 | $ | 82,972,324 | $ | 103,268,886 | ||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||
Cost of revenues(1) | 27,923,952 | 30,739,738 | 39,933,467 | |||||||||
Research and development(1) | 5,233,830 | 5,415,852 | 6,069,536 | |||||||||
Sales and marketing(1) | 10,954,325 | 14,537,159 | 15,728,352 | |||||||||
General and administrative(1) | 12,696,778 | 13,758,279 | 16,677,651 | |||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 2,854,146 | 1,863,452 | 2,519,211 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 1,394,843 | 2,056,609 | 3,578,340 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | 61,057,874 | 68,371,089 | 84,506,557 | |||||||||
Income from operations | 5,496,557 | 14,601,235 | 18,762,329 | |||||||||
Other expense: |
||||||||||||
Interest expense, net | (529,000 | ) | (1,427,055 | ) | (4,042,000 | ) | ||||||
Other income | — | — | 419,000 | |||||||||
Total other expense | (529,000 | ) | (1,427,055 | ) | (3,623,000 | ) | ||||||
Income before income taxes and minority interest | 4,967,557 | 13,174,180 | 15,139,329 | |||||||||
(Provision) benefit for income taxes |
2,135,951 |
(5,248,294 |
) |
(6,236,359 |
) |
|||||||
Net income before minority interest | 7,103,508 | 7,925,886 | 8,902,970 | |||||||||
Minority interest |
(254,150 |
) |
(495,303 |
) |
— |
|||||||
Net income | $ | 6,849,358 | $ | 7,430,583 | $ | 8,902,970 | ||||||
(1) Includes the following amounts related to stock-based compensation: | ||||||||||||
Cost of revenues |
$ |
— |
$ |
107,250 |
$ |
634,814 |
||||||
Research and development | — | 7,750 | 75,765 | |||||||||
Sales and marketing | — | 6,250 | 89,416 | |||||||||
General and administrative | — | 38,751 | 1,014,590 | |||||||||
$ | — | $ | 160,001 | $ | 1,814,585 | |||||||
See accompanying notes.
F-58
INSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDER SERVICES HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Additional Paid-In Capital |
Deferred Stock Compensation |
Accumulated Deficit |
Total Stockholders' Deficit |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares |
Amount |
Shares |
Amount |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2003 | 31,656 | $ | 29,080,165 | 7,066 | $ | 71 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 35,297 | $ | (18,783,822 | ) | $ | (18,748,454 | ) | |||||||||
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock issuance costs | — | 121,297 | — | — | (121,297 | ) | — | — | — | (121,297 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends on redeemable convertible preferred stock | — | 2,400,000 | — | — | (607,906 | ) | — | — | (1,792,094 | ) | (2,400,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Dividends paid on redeemable convertible preferred stock | — | (1,796,721 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Exercise of outstanding options to purchase common stock | — | — | 131 | 1 | 130,999 | — | — | — | 131,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit of nonqualified stock options exercised to purchase common stock | — | — | — | — | 86,204 | — | — | — | 86,204 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation related to stock option grants | — | — | — | — | 512,000 | (512,000 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6,849,358 | 6,849,358 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation | — | — | — | — | — | — | (21,243 | ) | — | (21,243 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6,828,115 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2004 | 31,656 | 29,804,741 | 7,197 | 72 | — | (512,000 | ) | 14,054 | (13,726,558 | ) | (14,224,432 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Accretion of deferred stock compensation | — | — | — | — | — | 160,001 | — | — | 160,001 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock issuance costs | — | 121,297 | — | — | (121,297 | ) | — | — | — | (121,297 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends on redeemable convertible preferred stock | — | 1,853,467 | — | — | (1,243,863 | ) | — | — | (609,604 | ) | (1,853,467 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Dividends paid on redeemable convertible preferred stock | — | (1,193,443 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Exercise of outstanding options to purchase common stock | — | — | 494 | 5 | 1,165,395 | — | — | — | 1,165,400 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of outstanding warrants to purchase common stock | — | — | 2,631 | 26 | 3,369 | — | — | — | 3,395 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit of nonqualified stock options exercised to purchase common stock | — | — | — | — | 196,396 | — | — | — | 196,396 | ||||||||||||||||||
Special dividend distribution to preferred and common stockholders | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (38,140,012 | ) | (38,140,012 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7,430,583 | 7,430,583 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation | — | — | — | — | — | — | (236,904 | ) | — | (236,904 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7,193,679 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2005 | 31,656 | 30,586,062 | 10,322 | 103 | — | (351,999 | ) | (222,850 | ) | (45,045,591 | ) | (45,620,337 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Reclassification of deferred stock compensation upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) | — | — | — | — | (351,999 | ) | 351,999 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock issuance costs | — | 121,296 | — | — | (121,296 | ) | — | — | — | (121,296 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends on redeemable convertible preferred stock | — | 618,322 | — | — | (618,322 | ) | — | — | — | (618,322 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | — | — | — | — | 1,814,585 | — | — | — | 1,814,585 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8,902,970 | 8,902,970 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation | — | — | — | — | — | — | 138,048 | — | 138,048 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9,041,018 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2006 | 31,656 | $ | 31,325,680 | 10,322 | $ | 103 | $ | 722,968 | $ | — | $ | (84,802 | ) | $ | (36,142,621 | ) | $ | (35,504,352 | ) | ||||||||
See accompanying notes.
F-59
INSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDER SERVICES HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
Years ended December 31 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
|||||||||
Operating activities | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 6,849,358 | $ | 7,430,583 | $ | 8,902,970 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 4,248,989 | 3,920,061 | 6,097,551 | |||||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discount | 184,843 | 490,273 | 349,713 | |||||||||
Minority interest | 262,624 | 495,303 | — | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes | (4,661,924 | ) | 1,897,130 | 706,591 | ||||||||
Non-cash stock compensation | — | 160,001 | 1,814,585 | |||||||||
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options | 86,204 | 196,396 | — | |||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of the effect of acquisitions of businesses: | ||||||||||||
Trade accounts receivable | (3,853,745 | ) | (3,634,786 | ) | (8,982,373 | ) | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 766,984 | 433,183 | (141,348 | ) | ||||||||
Other assets | (243,498 | ) | (76,003 | ) | (361,041 | ) | ||||||
Accounts payable | 243,140 | 738,808 | (1,828,500 | ) | ||||||||
Accrued expenses | 2,665,605 | 1,900,245 | 2,532,644 | |||||||||
Deferred revenues | 6,010,451 | 3,756,766 | 9,314,055 | |||||||||
Deferred rent | 186,803 | 41,934 | (27,290 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 12,745,834 | 17,749,894 | 18,377,557 | |||||||||
Investing activities |
||||||||||||
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired | — | (15,527,987 | ) | — | ||||||||
Acquisition of minority interest | — | — | (4,215,166 | ) | ||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment | (2,051,096 | ) | (5,354,902 | ) | (5,479,256 | ) | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (2,051,096 | ) | (20,882,889 | ) | (9,694,422 | ) | ||||||
Financing activities |
||||||||||||
Reduction in restricted cash equivalents | — | 219,988 | 109,994 | |||||||||
Repayment of credit facility | (2,000,000 | ) | (17,980,000 | ) | (7,000,000 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from credit facility | — | 62,000,000 | — | |||||||||
Deferred debt issuance costs | — | (1,145,804 | ) | — | ||||||||
Dividends paid to stockholders | (1,796,721 | ) | (39,333,455 | ) | — | |||||||
Dividend paid to joint venture partner | — | (238,438 | ) | (557,022 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants | 131,000 | 1,168,795 | — | |||||||||
Payments on capital lease obligations | (40,879 | ) | (12,470 | ) | (21,248 | ) | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (3,706,600 | ) | 4,678,616 | (7,468,276 | ) | |||||||
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents |
226,041 |
(368,917 |
) |
339,479 |
||||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 7,214,179 | 1,176,704 | 1,554,338 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 5,593,189 | 12,807,368 | 13,984,072 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 12,807,368 | $ | 13,984,072 | $ | 15,538,410 | ||||||
Supplemental schedule of cash flow activities |
||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 445,345 | $ | 1,262,584 | $ | 3,133,724 | ||||||
Cash paid for taxes | $ | 1,844,522 | $ | 3,751,337 | $ | 4,206,511 | ||||||
See accompanying notes.
F-60
INSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDER SERVICES HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
1. Organization
Institutional Shareholder Services Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), through its operating subsidiaries, is the leading provider of proxy voting and corporate governance services. The Company provides proxy research, voting recommendations, and governance advisory services to financial institutions and corporations worldwide. With more than 2,400 institutional and corporate clients throughout North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia, the Company analyzes proxy issues, issues research, and provides vote recommendations for more than 35,000 companies across 115 markets worldwide. Additionally, the Company provides services in the areas of Taft-Hartley proxy research and voting, social investment proxy research, voting and portfolio screening, global proxy distribution, and securities class action services. For corporate issuers, the Company provides a variety of corporate governance web-based tools, advisory services and publications that assist issuers with executive and director compensation modeling, capital structure planning, and understanding corporate governance best practices.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries: Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.; Securities Class Action Services, LLC; Institutional Shareholder Services Canada Corp.; ISS Europe Limited; ISS RREV, Inc.; Institutional Shareholder Services Japan, KK; Institutional Shareholder Services Europe S.A.; ISS France; 1 Corporate Governance Pty Ltd./Proxy Australia Pty Ltd. ("Proxy Australia"); Investor Responsibility Research Center, Inc. ("IRRC"); ISS Corporate Services, Inc.; and Research, Recommendations and Electronic Voting Limited ("RREV"). From its inception on January 1, 2004 until June 29, 2006, RREV was treated as a variable interest entity for which the Company was the primary beneficiary as discussed in Note 5. On June 29, 2006, the Company acquired the outstanding minority ownership of RREV. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consist of cash in banks and insured money market accounts. Certificates of deposit that serve as security deposits for certain of the Company's office leases have been classified as restricted cash equivalents in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
F-61
Revenue Recognition and Deferred Revenues
The Company derives a majority of its revenues from subscription contracts, which typically have terms ranging from one to three years. Multiyear contracts are typically invoiced annually in advance. Payments received in advance are recorded as deferred revenues and recognized ratably over the contract term provided persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been performed, the fee is fixed and determinable, and collectibility is probable. Reserves for possible losses on contracts, if any, are recognized when determined.
The majority of the Company's subscription contracts include automatic renewal provisions under existing contract terms. The Company continues to provide the contractual services and accordingly accrues revenues until the contract is formally renewed. These amounts are accumulated in unbilled receivables until invoiced.
A portion of the Company's revenues are derived from non-subscription services including advisory, database, and similar services. Non-subscription services are recognized as the respective services are performed or upon delivery of required elements.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues includes all direct costs associated with the production of revenues including compensation and compensation-related expenses; employee benefit plan and employee hiring costs; data; and third-party contract services. Cost of revenues also includes allocations of certain other expenses including occupancy, telephony, and hosting costs.
Research and Development Costs
Research and development expenditures are expensed as incurred and consist primarily of compensation and compensation-related expenses, third-party consulting and contract services, and allocations of overhead costs including occupancy and telephony expenses.
The Company capitalizes certain development and acquisition costs related to internal use software under the provisions of American Institute of Certified Public Accountants ("AICPA") Statement of Position (SOP) No. 98-1, Accounting for Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. Amortization of these capitalized development costs is included in depreciation and amortization expense.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are reported in the consolidated balance sheets at net realizable value, which approximates outstanding amounts, less the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company writes off uncollectible receivables when the likelihood of collection is remote. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts, which is based on historical experience and management's expectations of future losses. Credit losses have historically been within management's expectations.
The Company's policy is to record the full amount of the subscription contract receivable as an asset and related deferred revenues as a liability when a customer agrees to the terms of the contract and the customer has been invoiced. Advance payments are recorded as deferred revenues until the services are delivered or obligations are met. Deferred revenues represent the difference between amounts invoiced and amounts recognized as revenues.
F-62
Unbilled accounts receivable represent revenue that has been earned based on services performed; however, billing has yet to commence under the contractual terms of the arrangement. Accounts receivable consisted of the following:
|
December 31 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2006 |
|||||
Billed | $ | 22,346,400 | $ | 31,061,283 | |||
Unbilled | 105,388 | 443,359 | |||||
Total | 22,451,788 | 31,504,642 | |||||
Less allowance for doubtful accounts | (550,775 | ) | (621,256 | ) | |||
Accounts receivable, net | $ | 21,901,013 | $ | 30,883,386 | |||
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the assets' estimated useful lives that range from three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the assets or the term of the related lease. Costs to repair and maintain property and equipment are expensed as incurred.
The Company follows the provisions of AICPA SOP No. 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use, for the capitalization of certain acquisition and development costs related to its internal use software. Capitalization begins when the preliminary project state is complete.
Capitalization ceases when the internal project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, $3,850,216 and $3,049,342 of internal software development costs have been capitalized, respectively. Once the project is complete and available for its intended use, the Company amortizes these costs over a three year period. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006, the Company recorded amortization of $0, $145,788, and $907,817, respectively, related to internally developed software.
Major classes of property and equipment consisted of the following:
|
December 31 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2006 |
|||||
Computer equipment | $ | 7,290,971 | $ | 9,348,444 | |||
Internally developed software | 3,982,216 | 7,031,558 | |||||
Furniture and fixtures | 1,198,326 | 2,038,358 | |||||
Leasehold improvements | 1,874,713 | 1,479,823 | |||||
14,346,226 | 19,898,183 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (6,351,710 | ) | (9,742,597 | ) | |||
Property and equipment, net | $ | 7,994,516 | $ | 10,155,586 | |||
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006, the Company recorded depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment of approximately $1.3 million, $2.0 million, and $3.6 million, respectively.
F-63
Acquired Intangibles and Goodwill
Acquired intangibles are carried at cost less accumulated amortization and consist of intangible assets acquired by the Company. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, requires acquired intangibles other than goodwill to be amortized over their useful lives unless these lives are determined to be indefinite.
Goodwill represents the difference between the purchase price and the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired arising from business combinations. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, goodwill is subject to impairment tests annually or earlier if indicators of potential impairment exist, using a fair value-based approach.
The Company performed the required annual impairment test on the carrying amount of its goodwill, which indicated the Company's estimated fair value of goodwill exceeded its carrying value; therefore, no impairment was identified at December 31, 2005 and 2006.
The Company recorded goodwill and acquired intangibles in its acquisition of Deminor Rating S.A. ("Deminor") (now known as Institutional Shareholder Services Europe S.A.), Proxy Australia, IRRC during 2005, and the outstanding minority ownership of RREV in 2006 (see Notes 3 and 5). The goodwill acquired in the business acquisitions is subject to the provisions of SFAS No. 142, and, accordingly, is not being amortized. Furthermore, SFAS No. 142 requires acquired intangibles other than goodwill to be amortized over their useful lives unless these lives are determined to be indefinite. Acquired intangibles are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives of the assets:
Customer relationships | 7 years | |
Trade names | 7 years | |
License agreement | 7 years | |
Non-compete agreements | 1–6 years |
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company periodically evaluates the recoverability of the carrying value of its long-lived assets, other than goodwill and intangible assets, based on the criteria established in SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment on Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. The Company considers historical performance and anticipated future results in its evaluation of potential impairment. Accordingly, when indicators of impairment are present, the Company evaluates the carrying value of these assets in relation to the operating performance of the business and the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of these assets. Impairment losses are recognized when the sum of the expected future cash flows are less than the assets' carrying value. No such impairment losses have been recognized to date.
Debt Issuance Costs
Costs incurred to secure debt financing are capitalized and amortized to interest expense over the term of the related borrowings using the effective interest method.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
F-64
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss carryforward. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in operations in the period that includes the enactment date.
Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense is the tax payable for the period, and the change during the period, in deferred tax assets and liabilities.
Stock-Based Compensation
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for its equity-based compensation plans under the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations, as permitted by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) ("SFAS 123(R)"), Share-Based Payment, and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 107, Share-Based Payment, using modified prospective transition method. Under the modified prospective transition method, compensation cost recognized in 2006 includes compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123 and compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R). Results for prior periods have not been restated.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized during year ended December 31, 2006 is based on the value of the portion of stock-based awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the period.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Company's consolidated statement of income includes compensation expense for stock-based awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, December 31, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the pro forma provisions of SFAS No. 123 and compensation expense for stock-based payment awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with SFAS 123(R).
For stock-based awards granted prior to and in 2006, expenses are amortized under the straight-line attribution method. As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2006 is based on stock-based awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Pre-vesting forfeitures on the options granted during the year ended December 31, 2006 have been estimated to be less than 1% based on the Company's historical experience. In the pro forma information required under SFAS No. 123 for the periods prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for forfeitures as they occurred. The cumulative effect adjustment of adopting the change in estimating forfeitures was not considered material to the Company's financial statements for periods prior to January 1, 2006 upon implementation of SFAS 123(R).
F-65
As a result of adopting SFAS 123(R) on January 1, 2006, the Company's net income for the year ended December 31, 2006 is approximately $1.7 million lower than if it had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income had the Company applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123(R) to stock-based employee compensation for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005. The reported and pro forma net income for the year ended December 31, 2006 are the same because stock-based compensation is calculated under the provisions of SFAS 123(R). The amounts included in the table for the year-ended December 31, 2006 are for comparison purposes. The pro forma disclosure for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005 utilized Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of the respective options with such value recognized as expense over the options' vesting periods:
|
Years ended December 31 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
||||||
Net income, as reported | $ | 6,849,358 | $ | 7,430,583 | $ | 8,902,970 | |||
Add: stock-based employee compensation in reported net income | 3,642,442 | 160,001 | — | ||||||
Deduct: total stock-based employee expense determined under fair value-based method for all awards | (4,410,076 | ) | (1,614,816 | ) | — | ||||
Pro forma net income | $ | 6,081,724 | $ | 5,975,768 | $ | 8,902,970 | |||
Foreign Currency Translation
The functional currency for the Company's foreign operations is predominantly the applicable local currency. Translation of currencies for foreign subsidiary financial information is computed pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation, which provides that balance sheet amounts are translated at the year-end exchange rate and statements of income amounts are translated at the average-period exchange rate. Adjustments resulting from translation are included in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, a separate component of stockholders' deficit. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are charged to operations.
Comprehensive (Loss) Income
SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for reporting comprehensive (loss) income and its components in the financial statements. Comprehensive (loss) income includes foreign currency translation adjustments and is disclosed in the accompanying consolidated statements of redeemable preferred stock and stockholders' deficit.
Concentration of Credit Risk and Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions. Management believes that the financial risks associated with its cash and cash equivalents are minimal. The Company grants credit to customers based on evaluations of customers' financial condition, generally without requiring collateral.
F-66
The Company has wholly owned subsidiaries in the United Kingdom, Japan, Canada, Belgium, and Australia, and a branch in the Philippines. The Company's total assets located outside of the United States are as follows:
|
December 31 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2006 |
||||
United Kingdom | $ | 4,839,000 | $ | 4,162,000 | ||
Japan | 315,000 | 455,000 | ||||
Philippines | 636,000 | 802,000 | ||||
Canada | 1,709,000 | 2,811,000 | ||||
Belgium | 1,949,000 | 4,246,000 | ||||
Australia | 901,000 | 1,696,000 | ||||
France | — | 83,000 | ||||
$ | 10,349,000 | $ | 14,255,000 | |||
At December 31, 2005 and 2006, the Company had approximately $1,674,000 and $5,100,000, respectively, in receivables from customers of these subsidiaries. All other financial instruments or assets located in foreign countries or denominated in foreign currencies were insignificant at December 31, 2005 and 2006.
The carrying amount of current assets and liabilities approximates their fair values due to their short-term maturities. The fair value of notes payable approximated its carrying amount as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 based on rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 ("FIN 48"). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. It prescribes that a company should use a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold based on the technical merits of the tax position taken. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be measured as the largest amount of the tax benefits, determined on a cumulative probability basis, which is more likely than not to be realized upon ultimate settlement in the consolidated financial statements. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of FIN 48 on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements ("SFAS 157"). SFAS No. 157 provides enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. It clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability and establishes fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157 on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
F-67
3. Business Combinations
During 2005, the Company acquired all the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the following entities (collectively "Acquired Companies") as of the dates shown below.
Acquired Companies |
Date of Acquisition |
Purchase Price |
Location |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deminor Rating S.A. (Deminor) | May 25, 2005 | $ | 1.0 million | Belgium | |||
1 Corporate Governance Pty Ltd./Proxy Australia Pty Ltd. (Proxy Australia) | June 21, 2005 | $ | 0.7 million | Australia | |||
Investor Responsibility Research Center, Inc. (IRRC) | August 2, 2005 | $ | 14.3 million | United States |
Each of the Acquired Companies provides proxy voting, advisory and corporate governance services in their respective markets and was acquired to capitalize on business synergies and market opportunities in the industry. The results of operations of the Acquired Companies have been included in the consolidated financial statements since their respective acquisition dates. The aggregate purchase price of approximately $16.0 million, which is net of cash balances acquired of approximately $1.3 million, was paid in cash of $15.5 million and assumed long-term liabilities of $0.5 million. Goodwill of approximately $10.0 million is expected to be deductible for tax reporting purposes.
The Company obtained an appraisal from an independent third party to estimate the fair market value of identifiable intangible assets related to the acquisition of IRRC. The Company has estimated the fair value of identifiable intangible assets without independent appraisal for the Deminor and Proxy Australia acquisitions. The following table summarizes the aggregate estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed for the Acquired Companies.
Current assets | $ | 2,500,908 | |||
Property and equipment | 1,232,964 | ||||
Other noncurrent assets | 18,028 | ||||
Intangible assets subject to amortization: | |||||
Customer relationships | 3,655,658 | ||||
Non-compete agreements | 2,508,496 | ||||
Goodwill | 11,612,323 | ||||
Total assets acquired | 21,528,377 | ||||
Total liabilities assumed | (6,000,390 | ) | |||
Net assets acquired | $ | 15,527,987 | |||
As a result of the Company's planned integration of one of the acquired businesses, including the closure of an acquired facility as approved by the Board of Directors, certain employees of the acquired company were terminated and relocation to the Company's other sites was offered to the remaining employees. Accordingly, severance charges of approximately $143,000 and lease and related exit costs of approximately $1.1 million were accrued in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as part of the preliminary purchase price allocation as of December 31, 2005 included in the amounts above. During 2006, the Company incurred final lease and related exit costs of approximately $538,000. The remaining accrual of approximately $556,000 was reversed
F-68
during 2006 with an offset against goodwill recorded in connection with the acquired business. The results of operations for the Acquired Companies are included in the consolidated statements of income from the date of acquisition.
An unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005 is included below. This statement gives effect to the acquisitions of Deminor, Proxy Australia, and IRRC as if the transactions had occurred on January 1, 2004 and 2005, respectively, and includes the results of operations of Deminor, Proxy Australia, and IRRC for the periods presented.
|
Historical |
|
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ISS |
Acquired Companies |
Pro Forma Adjustments |
Pro Forma Combined |
||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2004 | ||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 66,554,431 | $ | 12,165,696 | $ | — | $ | 78,720,127 | ||||
Income (loss) from operations | 5,496,411 | 397,701 | (987,400 | ) | 4,906,712 | |||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interest | 4,967,557 | 431,367 | (1,595,400 | ) | 3,803,524 | |||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 6,849,358 | $ | 342,766 | $ | (1,129,787 | ) | $ | 6,062,338 | |||
Year ended December 31, 2005 |
||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 82,972,324 | $ | 6,085,479 | $ | — | $ | 89,057,803 | ||||
Income (loss) from operations | 14,599,588 | (1,888,283 | ) | (554,597 | ) | 12,156,708 | ||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interest | 13,174,180 | (1,885,270 | ) | (909,264 | ) | 10,379,646 | ||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 7,430,583 | $ | (1,922,187 | ) | $ | 217,557 | $ | 5,725,953 | |||
The pro forma adjustments increase amortization expense to provide for a full year of amortization on the identifiable intangible assets acquired in the business combinations. Further, interest expense has been adjusted to reflect borrowings under the Company's Amended Credit Facility (see Note 6) used to finance a portion of the aggregate purchase price. The provision for income taxes has been adjusted to reflect the impact of the aggregate pre-acquisition net losses of the Acquired Companies and the income tax impact of the pro forma adjustments related to intangible amortization and interest expense. These unaudited pro forma results are intended for informational purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred had the acquisitions been in effect at the beginning of the periods presented, or of future results of the combined operations.
F-69
4. Goodwill and Acquired Intangibles
The Company's intangible assets and related accumulated amortization consisted of the following:
|
December 31, 2005 |
December 31, 2006 |
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gross |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net |
Gross |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net |
||||||||||||
Customer relationships | $ | 11,457,658 | $ | (5,152,259 | ) | $ | 6,305,399 | $ | 11,457,658 | $ | (6,822,023 | ) | $ | 4,635,635 | ||||
Tradename | 2,223,000 | (1,402,607 | ) | 820,393 | 2,233,000 | (1,726,011 | ) | 506,989 | ||||||||||
Non-compete agreements | 4,390,496 | (2,083,335 | ) | 2,307,161 | 4,390,496 | (2,517,440 | ) | 1,873,056 | ||||||||||
Licenses | — | — | — | 1,146,569 | (81,898 | ) | 1,064,671 | |||||||||||
Goodwill | 28,979,258 | (329,408 | ) | 28,649,850 | 32,348,196 | (329,408 | ) | 32,018,788 | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 47,050,412 | $ | (8,967,609 | ) | $ | 38,082,803 | $ | 51,575,919 | $ | (11,476,780 | ) | $ | 40,099,139 | ||||
During the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, the Company recorded amortization expense of approximately $2.9 million, $2.0 million and $2.5 million, respectively. Annual amortization expense for the next five years is expected to be as follows:
2007 | $ | 2,531,000 | |
2008 | 1,930,000 | ||
2009 | 1,095,000 | ||
2010 | 1,095,000 | ||
2011 | 919,000 | ||
$ | 7,570,000 | ||
5. Joint Venture Investment
On June 11, 2003, through its wholly owned subsidiary, ISS RREV, Inc., the Company executed a joint venture agreement with the National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF). The joint venture, RREV, provides corporate governance analysis and electronic voting services to institutional investors and fund managers in the United Kingdom. The RREV service offering was first introduced January 1, 2004 and was equally owned by the Company and the NAPF.
In December 2003, the FASB issued a revised Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, replacing the original interpretation issued in January 2003. This interpretation requires a company to consolidate a variable-interest entity if it is designated as the primary beneficiary of that entity even if the company does not have a majority of voting interests. Historically, entities were generally consolidated by an enterprise when it had a controlling financial interest through ownership of a majority voting interest in the entity. A variable-interest entity is generally defined as an entity where its equity is unable to finance its activities or where the owners of the entity lack the risk and rewards of ownership.
The Company was deemed to be the primary beneficiary within the provisions of FIN 46. Thus, the Company consolidated the balance sheets and statements of income of RREV as of and for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005 in accordance with the provisions of FIN 46.
The Company invested $8,474 to acquire a 50% ownership in RREV. The Company's joint venture partner also contributed an equal amount of funding. The results of this joint venture are included in the consolidated financial statements. The noncontrolling interest attributable to the joint
F-70
venture as of December 31, 2005 was $519,489 and is reflected as minority interest in the consolidated balance sheets. The income attributable to the non-controlling interest in the joint venture for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005 was $254,150 and $495,303, respectively, and is reflected as minority interest in the consolidated statements of income. The Company recorded minority interest, which reflected the portion of earnings of RREV that was attributable to the joint venture partner. In 2005 and 2006, the Board of Directors of the joint venture approved aggregate dividend payments to the joint venture partners of $476,876 and $1,114,043, respectively. The Company's share of these dividends, $238,438 and $557,022, respectively, was recorded as a return of investment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2006.
On June 29, 2006, the Company acquired the outstanding minority interest in RREV from the joint venture partner for approximately $5.8 million, of which $1.6 million will be paid over the license agreement of seven years.
In connection with the RREV acquisition, the Company entered into an agreement with the former joint venture partner to license certain proprietary corporate governance policies and other rights for a period of seven years. Further, under the terms of the license agreement, the Company agreed to pay royalties to the former joint venture partner of 10% of all new sales as defined under the license agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2006, total royalties were not significant.
As the remaining payments were contingent solely on the passage of time, the Company discounted the amounts at the Company's incremental borrowing rate and recorded the net present value as a license intangible asset.
Of the total purchase price, $1.1 million (the present value of the deferred consideration) has been allocated to the license agreement. The license agreement is being amortized over a period of seven years. No incremental fair value was allocated to other acquired tangible assets. After elimination of minority interest, the remainder of $4.2 million has been allocated to goodwill.
The following is a summary of RREV's financial position at December 31, 2004 and 2005 and the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005:
|
2004 |
2005 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Financial position: | |||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,893,655 | $ | 3,259,237 | |||
Total liabilities | 2,340,064 | 2,272,022 | |||||
Net assets | $ | 553,591 | $ | 987,215 | |||
Results of operations: |
|||||||
Revenue | $ | 3,761,509 | $ | 4,696,589 | |||
Net income | $ | 508,300 | $ | 990,605 | |||
F-71
6. Debt
Credit Facility
On July 17, 2002, the Company entered into a credit agreement with a lender consisting of (i) term loans of $19,900,000 and (ii) revolving loans of $2,000,000 (collectively, the Credit Facility).
At the Company's option, borrowings under the Credit Facility bore interest at a floating base rate, as defined in the Agreement, or the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR"), plus a specified margin ranging from 2.00% to 4.25%. On October 7, 2005, the Company refinanced balances outstanding under the Credit Facility under the Amended Credit Facility discussed below. In connection with this refinancing, the Company wrote off approximately $306,000 of deferred financing costs.
Amended and Restated Credit Facility
On October 7, 2005, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the "Agreement") with a lender for a $67,000,000 senior secured credit facility (the "Amended Credit Facility") comprised of a (i) term loan of $52,000,000 and (ii) revolving loan of $15,000,000. At closing, the Company drew fully the term loan of $52,000,000. The balance available under the revolving loan was undrawn at December 31, 2006. All balances outstanding under the Company's Credit Facility were refinanced with the proceeds from the Amended Credit Facility. The amount outstanding under the Amended Credit Facility at December 31, 2005 and 2006 was $51,870,000 and $44,870,000, respectively. Under the terms of the Agreement, the term loan matures September 30, 2011 and the revolving loan, which may be repaid and borrowed, is available through September 30, 2010. The revolving loan is available to finance working capital needs, permitted acquisitions, as defined, and for general corporate purposes.
The interest rate under the facility is a floating rate based, at the Company's option, on an index rate or LIBOR, plus a specified margin ranging from 1.50% to 2.50%. Additionally, unused balances under the revolving loan portion of the facility incur unused facility fees of 0.5% per year. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, unused facility fees incurred were approximately $18,000 and $75,000, respectively.
Advances under the agreement as of December 31, 2006 bear interest at an annual rate of 7.86%. Interest expense incurred under the Credit Facility and the Amended Credit Facility for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006 was $1,235,000 and $3,558,000, respectively.
The Company's Amended Credit Facility is subject to certain financial covenants, measured quarterly, including (i) minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, (ii) maximum leverage ratio, and (iv) maximum capital expenditures, each as defined under the Agreement. The Company was in compliance with these covenants as of December 31, 2006. Amounts outstanding under the Amended Credit Facility are secured by substantially all of the Company's assets including pledges of the capital stock of the Company's United States-based operating subsidiaries.
In connection with the Amended Credit Facility, the Company incurred fees and other placement costs of approximately $1.1 million. These costs are amortized as interest expense over the term of the Agreement.
F-72
Scheduled repayments of balances outstanding under the Credit Facility at December 31, 2006 are as follows:
Years ending December 31: |
|
||
---|---|---|---|
2007 | $ | 5,200,000 | |
2008 | 5,200,000 | ||
2009 | 5,200,000 | ||
2010 | 5,200,000 | ||
2011 | 24,070,000 | ||
$ | 44,870,000 | ||
7. Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
In July 2001, the Company completed the issuance of 31,656 shares of preferred stock for gross proceeds of $30.0 million. The holders of the preferred stock are entitled to the greater of (i) a cumulative dividend of 8.0% per annum, compounded annually, on the initial per share purchase price, subject to adjustment for certain dilutive events, as defined, or (ii) the pro rata portion of any dividend paid on the common stock as if the preferred stock had been converted immediately prior to the dividend. The preferred stock has a liquidation preference senior to all other classes of stock. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, the Company accreted dividends of approximately $1.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
On September 29, 2005, the Board of Directors approved the payment of a special dividend of approximately $38.1 million to the holders of preferred stock and common stock. The special dividend was paid on October 7, 2005. Of the total special dividend, the holders of preferred stock and common stock received approximately $28.8 million and $9.3 million, respectively. Since the holders of preferred stock elected to participate in the special dividend, cumulative dividends of 8% per annum are neither accrued or paid for a 12-month period from the date of the distribution.
Each share of preferred stock may be converted, at any time, into shares of common stock at the then applicable conversion rate, as defined. The initial conversion rate is one common share for each preferred share, subsequently adjusted for dilutive events, as defined.
The preferred stock will automatically convert into common stock at the then applicable conversion rate upon (i) a majority vote of the holders, (ii) a majority of the shares of preferred stock being converted, or (iii) a public offering of the Company's common stock resulting in aggregate proceeds of at least $50.0 million and a pre-money valuation of at least $150.0 million. The Company has reserved 31,656 shares of common stock for the potential conversion of preferred stock.
The Company is required to redeem the preferred stock at a per share price of $1,000 plus all accrued and unpaid dividends upon a change in control, as defined, or at any time after July 2011, if requested by the holders of the preferred stock. The preferred stockholders are entitled to the number of votes into which each share of preferred stock may be converted, as defined.
The relative fair value of the warrants assigned to the preferred stock approximated $689,000. This value, as well as incremental costs of $523,600 directly related to the issuance of the preferred
F-73
stock, has been recorded as a reduction of the preferred stock carrying amount and is being accreted on a straight-line basis over the 10-year period from the date of issuance to the mandatory redemption date.
8. Stockholders' Deficit
Common Stock
On September 29, 2005, the Board of Directors approved the payment of a special dividend of approximately $38.1 million to the holders of preferred stock and common stock. The special dividend was paid on October 7, 2005. Of the total special dividend, the holders of preferred stock and common stock received approximately $28.8 million and $9.3 million, respectively.
Warrants
In October 2000 and July 2001, the Company issued warrants to purchase 3,070 and 1,214 shares of common stock, respectively, to certain holders of prior notes payable and preferred stock. The Series A warrants provided for a per share exercise price of $3.65 and expired on October 18, 2007. The Series B warrants provided for an exercise price of $10.00 per share and expired on July 25, 2011. In 2002, warrants to purchase 1,649 shares of common stock were exercised. All remaining warrants were exercised in 2005.
Stock Options
On October 1, 2002, the Company's stockholders approved and amended the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan (the Plan) originally adopted in October 2001. The Plan was adopted to advance the interests of the Company in attracting and retaining key employees through ownership of shares of common stock through various forms including options (incentive and non-incentive), stock appreciation rights, restricted or unrestricted stock, deferred stock awards, performance awards, loans or supplemental grants or various combinations.
The Plan is administered by the Company's Board of Directors and terminates on October 1, 2012. In 2005, the Board of Directors increased the aggregate number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the Plan from 8,453 to 8,859. Eligible participants include all employees of the Company including non-employee directors. Each option granted under the Plan terminates no later than 10 years from the date the option was granted. Options granted under the Plan become exercisable based on vesting schedules determined by the Plan administrator. At its discretion, the Plan administrator may accelerate the time at which all or part of the options granted under the Plan may be exercised. For incentive stock options, the option price will not be less than the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date the option is granted. For non-incentive options, the option price will not be less than the par value of common stock. The Plan administrator may reduce the exercise price of an option at any time subsequent to the grant date but in the case of incentive options, only with the consent of the option holder.
F-74
Given the absence of an active market for the Company's common stock, the exercise price of the stock options on the date of grant was determined and approved by the Board of Directors using several factors, including progress and milestones achieved in the Company's business development and performance, the price per share of its convertible preferred stock offerings, and general industry and economic trends. In establishing the estimated fair value of the common stock, the Company considered the guidance set forth in AICPA Practice Guide, Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation, and made a retrospective determination of its fair value.
At December 31, 2006, the number of shares subject to options granted under the Plan was 8,147 with exercise prices ranging from $1,000 to $4,800 per share.
A summary of all stock-option plan activity during the year ended December 31, 2006 is as follows:
|
Shares |
Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 | 7,775 | $ | 2,376 | |||||
Granted | 372 | 4,667 | ||||||
Exercised | — | — | ||||||
Canceled | — | — | ||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 | 8,147 | 2,462 | 7.0 | |||||
Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2006 |
8,147 |
2,462 |
7.0 |
|||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2006 | 5,093 | 2,174 | 6.6 | |||||
The total fair value of stock options that vested during the year ended December 31, 2006 was approximately $1,815,000.
The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted with an exercise price that equaled fair market value at the date of grant during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 was $1,022, $1,362 and $1,850, respectively. The fair value of awards was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
Years ended December 31 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
||||
Dividend yield | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | |
Expected volatility | 31.6 | % | 39.2 | % | 42.0 | % | |
Weighted-average risk-free interest rate | 3.20 | % | 3.75 | % | 4.45 | % | |
Expected term | 5 years | 5 years | 5 years |
A discussion of management's methodology for developing each of the assumptions used in the valuation model is described below.
The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model ("Black-Scholes model") for estimating fair value of its stock options granted. Option valuation models, including the Black-Scholes model, require the input of highly subjective assumptions, and changes in the assumptions used can materially affect the grant date fair value of an award.
F-75
These assumptions include the risk-free rate of interest, expected dividend yield, expected volatility, and the expected life of the award.
Expected volatility rates are based on historical volatility of the common stock of comparable publicly traded entities and other factors due to the lack of historic information of the Company's common stock. The expected term of options granted is based on the transition approach provided by SAB No. 107 as the options meet the "plain vanilla" criteria required by this method.
The risk-free interest rates are based on the U.S. Treasury yield for a period consistent with the expected term of the option in effect at the time of the grant. The Company paid a special dividend to preferred and common stockholders during 2005; however, the Company does not expect to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.
As of December 31, 2006, there was approximately $3.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested options under the Company' stock compensation plan. The expenses are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years.
On September 24, 2004, option holders with options to purchase 1,873 shares of common stock with exercise prices ranging from $1,000 to $1,569 per common share had those options canceled in exchange for payment by the Company of the difference between the aggregate exercise price and the fair market value of the common stock on the date of cancellation of $3,000 per share. The aggregate payment upon cancellation, being the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value on the date of exercise, approximated $3,642,000 and was expensed in the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2004 as follows:
Cost of revenues | $ | 2,956,000 | |
Sales and marketing | 200,000 | ||
General and administrative | 486,000 | ||
$ | 3,642,000 | ||
In October and December 2004, the Company issued options to purchase 2,560 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $2,800 per common share. At the grant dates, the fair market value of the underlying common stock was $3,000 per common share. As such, the Company recorded deferred stock compensation related to these options of $512,000 representing the aggregate difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the common stock at the grant dates. Through December 31, 2005, $160,001 was recognized as expense over the expected service period. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006, amortization of the deferred stock compensation ceased and the balance of deferred stock compensation, $351,999, was reclassified to additional paid-in capital.
In October 2005, the Board of Directors approved an aggregate cash distribution to option holders with grants completed on or before May 1, 2005 of approximately $6.9 million to be paid in four annual installments. The first installment of $1.6 million was paid on or about October 7, 2005. The balance of the distribution vests over three years and will be paid in three equal annual installments of approximately $1.8 million on October 7, 2006, 2007, and 2008. Option holder
F-76
distributions are expensed as earned. Option holder distributions recognized during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006 were comprised of the following:
|
Years ended December 31 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2006 |
||||
Cost of revenues | $ | 763,000 | $ | 610,000 | ||
Research and development | 104,000 | 83,000 | ||||
Sales and marketing | 208,000 | 166,000 | ||||
General and administrative | 965,000 | 893,000 | ||||
$ | 2,040,000 | $ | 1,752,000 | |||
9. Income Taxes
As of December 31, 2004, the Company had generated three years of cumulative operating profits. As a result of this positive earnings trend and projected future taxable income, the Company reversed approximately $4.7 million of its deferred tax asset valuation allowance in 2004 having then determined that it is more likely than not that this portion of the deferred tax asset will be realized.
Significant components of the (provision for) benefit from income taxes consisted of the following:
|
Years ended December 31 |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
||||||||
Current: | |||||||||||
Federal | $ | (1,919,000 | ) | $ | (2,592,000 | ) | $ | (4,270,000 | ) | ||
State | (371,000 | ) | (561,000 | ) | (1,028,000 | ) | |||||
Foreign | (236,000 | ) | (438,000 | ) | (456,000 | ) | |||||
Total current | (2,526,000 | ) | (3,591,000 | ) | (5,754,000 | ) | |||||
Deferred: |
|||||||||||
Federal | 3,633,000 | (1,418,000 | ) | (358,000 | ) | ||||||
State | 786,000 | (307,000 | ) | (78,000 | ) | ||||||
Foreign | 243,000 | 68,000 | (46,000 | ) | |||||||
Total deferred | 4,662,000 | (1,657,000 | ) | (482,000 | ) | ||||||
Total (provision for) benefit from income taxes | $ | 2,136,000 | $ | (5,248,000 | ) | $ | (6,236,000 | ) | |||
F-77
Significant components of the Company's net deferred tax were as follows:
|
December 31 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2006 |
||||||
Deferred tax assets (liabilities): | ||||||||
Amortization of intangibles | $ | 2,833,000 | $ | 2,241,000 | ||||
Internally developed software | (1,576,000 | ) | (2,366,000 | ) | ||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | 159,000 | 203,000 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | — | 607,000 | ||||||
Foreign net operating losses | 346,000 | 577,000 | ||||||
Accrued expenses | 825,000 | 789,000 | ||||||
Depreciation | 418,000 | 430,000 | ||||||
3,005,000 | 2,481,000 | |||||||
Valuation allowance | (240,000 | ) | (423,000 | ) | ||||
Net deferred tax asset | $ | 2,765,000 | $ | 2,058,000 | ||||
The (provision) benefit for income taxes differs from the amount of taxes determined by applying the U.S. Federal statutory rate to income before income taxes and minority interest as a result of the following for the years ended December 31:
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Federal tax at statutory rates | (35.0 | )% | (35.0 | )% | (35.0 | )% | |
State taxes, net of federal benefit | (4.8 | ) | (4.8 | ) | (4.8 | ) | |
Change in valuation allowance | 85.6 | — | (0.1 | ) | |||
Permanent differences | (1.4 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (1.5 | ) | |
Other | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 | ||||
(Provision) benefit for income taxes | 45.3 | % | (39.8 | )% | (41.2 | )% | |
The Company has $389,000 of net operating losses in Japan. These net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in the year 2007 if unused.
10. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company leases office space and equipment under various capital and operating lease agreements. Some of the office space leases contain escalation clauses and require the Company to pay its share of any increases in operating expenses and real estate taxes. The Company records deferred rent for the difference between cash payments and the calculated straight-line rent expense over the term of the lease. The lease agreement for the primary office space terminates in July 2012. Rent expense was $2,492,000, $3,062,000, and $4,099,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006, respectively.
F-78
As of December 31, 2006, minimum future rental payments under operating and capital leases are as follows:
|
Operating |
Capital |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Years ending December 31: | ||||||||
2007 | $ | 3,465,000 | $ | 28,949 | ||||
2008 | 3,025,000 | 28,949 | ||||||
2009 | 2,691,000 | 7,237 | ||||||
2010 | 2,535,000 | — | ||||||
2011 | 2,535,000 | — | ||||||
Thereafter | 2,166,000 | — | ||||||
Total minimum lease payments | $ | 16,417,000 | 65,135 | |||||
Less amount representing interest | (7,761 | ) | ||||||
Present value of minimum lease payments | 57,374 | |||||||
Less current portion of capital lease obligations | (23,741 | ) | ||||||
Long-term portion | $ | 33,633 | ||||||
Although the Company is not currently involved in any legal proceedings expected to have a material adverse impact, legal actions may arise in the normal course of business, some of which may seek substantial monetary damages.
11. Related Party Transactions
The managing director of Institutional Shareholder Services Europe S.A. is a non-executive partner of Deminor International SCRL ("International"). In 2005, the operations of Institutional Shareholder Services Europe S.A. were acquired from International for approximately $1.0 million. Additionally, the Company entered into a transition services agreement with International to provide certain post-acquisition personnel and general and administrative support services for which the Company paid International approximately $294,000. The transition services agreement was terminated effective December 31, 2005.
12. Employee Benefit Plan
The Company has a defined contribution plan covering substantially all employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. Participants may elect to contribute a specified portion of their compensation to the plan on a tax-deferred basis. The Company, at the discretion of the Board of Directors, may make contributions to the plan. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006, the Company recorded matching contributions of approximately $661,000, $749,000, and $955,000, respectively. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company made contributions of approximately $84,000 to a defined contribution plan sponsored by IRRC ("IRRC Plan") which was acquired in August 2005. The IRRC Plan was terminated effective December 31, 2005 and all IRRC Plan assets were consolidated with the Company's plan.
13. Subsequent Events
On January 11, 2007, Risk Metrics Group, Inc. ("RMG") acquired the outstanding equity of the Company for a total purchase price of approximately $542.6 million including cash and assumption of substantially all liabilities. The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of RMG.
F-79
Shares
RiskMetrics Group, Inc.
Common Stock
Credit Suisse
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
Banc of America Securities LLC
Dealer Prospectus Delivery Obligation
Until , 2007, all dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealer's obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with respect to unsold allotments or subscriptions.
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance.
The expenses in connection with the registration of the shares of common stock covered by this prospectus are set forth in the following table. All amounts except the registration and FINRA filing fee are estimated:
Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee | $ | 6,140 | ||
FINRA filing fee | 20,500 | |||
Printing and engraving expenses | * | |||
Accounting fees and expenses | * | |||
Legal fees and expenses | * | |||
Miscellaneous | * | |||
Total | $ | * | ||
All expenses in connection with the issuance and distribution of the securities being offered shall be borne by the registrant, other than underwriting discounts and selling commissions, if any.
Item 14. Indemnification of Directors and Officers.
Delaware General Corporation Law
We are incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware. Under Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL, a corporation may indemnify its directors, officers, employees and agents and its former directors, officers, employees and agents and those who serve, at the corporation's request, in such capacities with another enterprise, against expenses, including attorneys' fees, as well as judgments, fines and settlements in nonderivative lawsuits, actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the defense of any action, suit or proceeding in which they or any of them were or are made parties or are threatened to be made parties by reason of their serving or having served in such capacity. The DGCL provides, however, that such person must have acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation and, in the case of a criminal action, such person must have had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. In addition, the DGCL does not permit indemnification in an action or suit by or in the right of the corporation, where such person has been adjudged liable to the corporation, unless, and only to the extent that, a court determines that such person fairly and reasonably is entitled to indemnity for costs the court deems proper in light of liability adjudication. Indemnity is mandatory to the extent a claim, issue or matter has been successfully defended.
Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws
Our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that none of our directors shall be personally liable for breach of fiduciary duty as a director. Any repeal or modification of that provision shall not adversely affect any right or protection, or any limitation of the liability of, any of our directors existing at, or arising out of facts or incidents occurring prior to, the effective date of such repeal or modification. Our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides for the indemnification of our directors, officers, employees and agents to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL.
II-1
Indemnification Agreements
We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors which may, in certain cases, be broader than the specific indemnification provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation and by-laws. The indemnification agreements may require us, among other things, to indemnify such directors against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors, officers or employees of the company and to advance the expenses incurred by such parties as a result of any threatened claims or proceedings brought against them as to which they could be indemnified.
Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.
Since August 1, 2004, the registrant has issued to directors, officers and employees options to purchase 8,436,575 shares of common stock with per share exercise prices ranging from $1.48 to $16.50, and has issued 1,021,527 shares of common stock upon exercise of such options.
On January 11, 2007, the registrant acquired Institutional Shareholder Services Holdings, Inc. and issued 2,774,351 shares of common stock and options to purchase 1,396,000 shares of common stock in connection therewith.
On August 1, 2007, the registrant acquired CFRA Holdings, LLC and issued 1,128,661 shares of common stock in connection therewith.
Other than the issuances of options to purchase shares of common stock to directors, officers and employees, the issuance of securities described above were deemed to be exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on Rule 506 as promulgated under the Securities Act. The issuances of options to purchase common stock to directors, officers and employees were deemed to be exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on Rule 701 as promulgated under the Securities Act.
Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
Exhibit Number |
Description |
|
---|---|---|
1.1 | Form of Underwriting Agreement* | |
3.1 |
Form of Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation* |
|
3.2 |
Form of Second Amended and Restated By-laws* |
|
4.1 |
Specimen Common Stock Certificate* |
|
5.1 |
Opinion of Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP* |
|
10.1 |
First Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2007, among RiskMetrics Group Holdings, LLC, RiskMetrics Group, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and the other lenders party thereto |
|
10.2 |
First Lien Guaranty, dated as of January 11, 2007, among each of the subsidiaries of RiskMetrics Group Holdings, LLC listed on the schedules thereto and Bank of America, N.A. |
|
10.3 |
First Lien Security Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2007, among RiskMetrics Group Holdings, LLC, the guarantors party thereto and Bank of America, N.A. |
|
II-2
10.4 |
Second Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2007, among RiskMetrics Group Holdings, LLC, RiskMetrics Group, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and the other lenders party thereto |
|
10.5 |
Second Lien Guaranty, dated as of January 11, 2007, among each of the subsidiaries of RiskMetrics Group Holdings, LLC listed on the schedules thereto and Bank of America, N.A. |
|
10.6 |
Second Lien Security Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2007, among RiskMetrics Group Holdings, LLC, the guarantors party thereto and Bank of America, N.A. |
|
10.7 |
Registrant's 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan |
|
10.8 |
Registrant's 2004 Stock Option Plan |
|
10.9 |
Registrant's 2000 Stock Option Plan |
|
10.10 |
ISS Equity Incentive Plan |
|
10.11 |
Second Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2007, between Registrant and the stockholders party thereto |
|
10.12 |
Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2007, between Registrant and the stockholders party thereto |
|
10.13 |
Datafeed License Agreement, dated October 27, 2003, between ISS and ADP Investor Communications Services, Inc.** |
|
10.14 |
First Amendment to Datafeed License Agreement, dated as of January 3, 2005, between ISS and ADP Investor Communications Services, Inc.** |
|
10.15 |
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among RiskMetrics Group, Inc., RMG Holdco, Inc., RMG Merger Sub, Inc., ISS Merger Sub, Inc., and Institutional Shareholder Services Holdings, Inc., dated as of October 31, 2006 |
|
21.1 |
Subsidiaries of RiskMetrics Group, Inc. |
|
23.1 |
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP |
|
23.2 |
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP |
|
23.3 |
Consent of Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1)* |
|
24.1 |
Power of Attorney (included in signature page to the Registration Statement) |
Item 17. Undertakings.
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriters at the closing specified in the Underwriting Agreement certificates in such denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.
II-3
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
The Registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this Registration Statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this Registration Statement as of the time it was declared effective.
(2) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-4
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of New York, State of New York, on this 19th day of September, 2007.
RiskMetrics Group, Inc. | |||
/s/ M. ETHAN BERMAN M. Ethan Berman Chief Executive Officer |
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below does hereby constitute and appoint M. Ethan Berman, with full power of substitution and full power to act, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent to act for him in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this registration statement, any and all registration statements filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 (including post-effective amendments) to register additional securities and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done in order to effectuate the same as fully, to all intents and purposes, as they or he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature |
Title |
Date |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
/s/ M. ETHAN BERMAN M. Ethan Berman |
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
September 19, 2007 | ||
/s/ DAVID M. OBSTLER David M. Obstler |
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
September 19, 2007 |
||
/s/ BETH GASPICH Beth Gaspich |
Director of Finance (Principal Accounting Officer) |
September 19, 2007 |
||
/s/ PETER BERNARD Peter Bernard |
Director |
September 19, 2007 |
||
/s/ PHILIP DUFF Philip Duff |
Director |
September 19, 2007 |
||
II-5
/s/ RENE M. KERN Rene M. Kern |
Director |
September 19, 2007 |
||
/s/ ARTHUR LEVITT Arthur Levitt |
Director |
September 19, 2007 |
||
/s/ CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL Christopher Mitchell |
Director |
September 19, 2007 |
||
/s/ STEPHEN THIEKE Stephen Thieke |
Director |
September 19, 2007 |
||
/s/ ROBERT TRUDEAU Robert Trudeau |
Director |
September 19, 2007 |
II-6
Exhibit Number |
Description |
|
---|---|---|
1.1 |
Form of Underwriting Agreement* |
|
3.1 | Form of Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation* | |
3.2 | Form of Second Amended and Restated By-laws* | |
4.1 | Specimen Common Stock Certificate* | |
5.1 | Opinion of Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP* | |
10.1 | First Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2007, among RiskMetrics Group Holdings, LLC, RiskMetrics Group, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and the other lenders party thereto | |
10.2 | First Lien Guaranty, dated as of January 11, 2007, among each of the subsidiaries of RiskMetrics Group Holdings, LLC listed on the schedules thereto and Bank of America, N.A. | |
10.3 | First Lien Security Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2007, among RiskMetrics Group Holdings, LLC, the guarantors party thereto and Bank of America, N.A. | |
10.4 | Second Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2007, among RiskMetrics Group Holdings, LLC, RiskMetrics Group, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and the other lenders party thereto | |
10.5 | Second Lien Guaranty, dated as of January 11, 2007, among each of the subsidiaries of RiskMetrics Group Holdings, LLC listed on the schedules thereto and Bank of America, N.A. | |
10.6 | Second Lien Security Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2007, among RiskMetrics Group Holdings, LLC, the guarantors party thereto and Bank of America, N.A. | |
10.7 | Registrant's 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan | |
10.8 | Registrant's 2004 Stock Option Plan | |
10.9 | Registrant's 2000 Stock Option Plan | |
10.10 | ISS Equity Incentive Plan | |
10.11 | Second Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2007, between Registrant and the stockholders party thereto | |
10.12 | Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2007, between Registrant and the stockholders party thereto | |
10.13 | Datafeed License Agreement, dated October 27, 2003, between ISS and ADP Investor Communications Services, Inc.** | |
10.14 | First Amendment to Datafeed License Agreement, dated as of January 3, 2005, between ISS and ADP Investor Communications Services, Inc.** | |
10.15 | Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among RiskMetrics Group, Inc., RMG Holdco, Inc., RMG Merger Sub, Inc., ISS Merger Sub, Inc., and Institutional Shareholder Services Holdings, Inc., dated as of October 31, 2006 | |
21.1 | Subsidiaries of RiskMetrics Group, Inc. | |
23.1 | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP | |
23.2 | Consent of Ernst & Young LLP | |
23.3 | Consent of Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1)* | |
24.1 | Power of Attorney (included in signature page to the Registration Statement) |
II-7
This ‘S-1’ Filing | Date | Other Filings | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
7/11/14 | ||||
1/11/14 | ||||
1/11/13 | ||||
10/1/12 | ||||
9/30/11 | ||||
7/25/11 | ||||
9/30/10 | ||||
12/31/09 | 10-K, 10-K/A | |||
12/31/08 | 10-K, 5 | |||
10/7/08 | 4 | |||
6/30/08 | 10-Q | |||
1/1/08 | ||||
12/31/07 | 10-K | |||
11/15/07 | ||||
10/18/07 | ||||
10/7/07 | ||||
Filed on: | 9/19/07 | |||
9/17/07 | ||||
8/30/07 | ||||
8/1/07 | ||||
7/31/07 | ||||
7/26/07 | ||||
6/30/07 | ||||
6/29/07 | ||||
5/17/07 | ||||
5/4/07 | ||||
5/1/07 | ||||
1/12/07 | ||||
1/11/07 | ||||
1/1/07 | ||||
12/31/06 | ||||
12/15/06 | ||||
12/14/06 | ||||
11/15/06 | ||||
11/1/06 | ||||
10/31/06 | ||||
10/19/06 | ||||
10/7/06 | ||||
7/20/06 | ||||
6/30/06 | ||||
6/29/06 | ||||
4/30/06 | ||||
3/31/06 | ||||
1/1/06 | ||||
12/31/05 | ||||
12/15/05 | ||||
10/7/05 | ||||
9/29/05 | ||||
8/2/05 | ||||
6/21/05 | ||||
5/25/05 | ||||
5/1/05 | ||||
3/16/05 | ||||
3/1/05 | ||||
1/3/05 | ||||
1/1/05 | ||||
12/31/04 | ||||
9/24/04 | ||||
8/1/04 | ||||
6/30/04 | ||||
6/14/04 | ||||
1/6/04 | ||||
1/1/04 | ||||
12/31/03 | ||||
10/27/03 | ||||
6/11/03 | ||||
3/31/03 | ||||
12/31/02 | ||||
10/1/02 | ||||
7/17/02 | ||||
6/30/02 | ||||
12/31/00 | ||||
8/18/00 | ||||
1/1/99 | ||||
List all Filings |
As Of Filer Filing For·On·As Docs:Size Issuer Filing Agent 1/23/08 SEC UPLOAD¶ 10/11/17 1:69K RiskMetrics Group Inc. |