SEC Info  
    Home      Search      My Interests      Help      Sign In      Please Sign In

Cloud Peak Energy Inc. – IPO: ‘S-1/A’ on 10/17/08

On:  Friday, 10/17/08, at 4:30pm ET   ·   Accession #:  1047469-8-11034   ·   File #:  333-152870

Previous ‘S-1’:  ‘S-1’ on 10/1/08   ·   Next:  ‘S-1’ on 8/12/09   ·   Latest:  ‘S-1/A’ on 12/13/10

Find Words in Filings emoji
 
  in    Show  and   Hints

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size              Issuer               Agent

10/17/08  Cloud Peak Energy Inc.            S-1/A                  5:2.9M                                   Merrill Corp/New/FA

Initial Public Offering (IPO):  Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration Statement (General Form)   —   Form S-1
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: S-1/A       Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration Statement   HTML   2.02M 
                          (General Form)                                         
 2: EX-23.1     Consent of Experts or Counsel                       HTML      7K 
 3: EX-23.2     Consent of Experts or Counsel                       HTML      8K 
 4: EX-24.1     Power of Attorney                                   HTML      8K 
 5: EX-99.2     Miscellaneous Exhibit                               HTML      8K 


S-1/A   —   Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration Statement (General Form)
Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page   -   Filing Submission
"Table of Contents
"Prospectus Summary
"Risk Factors
"Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
"Use of Proceeds
"Dividend Policy
"Separation Transactions and Related Agreements
"Capitalization
"Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information
"Selected Consolidated Financial and Operating Data
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
"The Coal Industry
"Business
"Environmental and Other Regulatory Matters
"Management
"Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
"Principal and Selling Shareholders
"Description of Capital Stock
"Shares Eligible for Future Sale
"Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
"Underwriting
"Legal Matters
"Experts
"Experts -- Coal Reserves
"Where You Can Find Additional Information
"Glossary of Selected Terms
"Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements
"Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2008 (Restated)
"Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and 2008 (Restated)
"Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholder's Equity for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 (Restated)
"Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and 2008
"Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
"Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008
"Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2008
"Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholder's Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
"Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2008
"Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
"Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2007
"Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
"Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
"Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
"Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

This is an HTML Document rendered as filed.  [ Alternative Formats ]




Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 17, 2008

Registration No. 333-152870

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933


CLOUD PEAK ENERGY INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation)
  1221
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
  26-3088162
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)


505 S. Gillette Ave.
Gillette, WY 82718
(307) 687-6000
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant's principal executive offices)


Colin Marshall
Chief Executive Officer
Cloud Peak Energy Inc.
505 S. Gillette Ave.
Gillette, WY 82718
(307) 687-6000
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)


Copies to:

Stuart H. Gelfond, Esq.
Vasiliki B. Tsaganos, Esq.
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver &
Jacobson LLP
One New York Plaza
New York, NY 10004
Tel: (212) 859-8000
Fax: (212) 859-4000
  Craig Johnson, Esq.
Rio Tinto Services Inc.
4700 Daybreak Parkway
South Jordan, UT 84095
Tel: (801) 204-2801
Fax: (801) 204-2892
  Richard A. Drucker, Esq.
Davis Polk & Wardwell
450 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10017
Tel : (212) 450-4000
Fax: (212) 450-3800


         Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:    As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.


         If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box.    o

         If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o

         If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o

         If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer ý
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company o

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

 
Title of each class of
securities to be registered

  Proposed maximum
aggregate
offering price(1)

  Amount of
registration fee

 

Common stock, par value $0.01 per share

  $1,000,000,000   $39,300(2)

 

(1)
Estimated solely for the purpose of computing the amount of the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933.
(2)
Previously paid.

         The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.


Table of Contents

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These securities may not be sold until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED OCTOBER 17, 2008

             Shares

CLOUD PEAK ENERGY INC.

GRAPHIC

Common Stock


        Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock. The initial public offering price of our common stock is expected to be between $             and $             per share. We have applied to list our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "CLD."

        Prior to the completion of this offering and the concurrent offering of our             % Series A Mandatory Convertible Preferred Voting Stock by means of a separate prospectus, we will effect a series of transactions with Rio Tinto America Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc. Rio Tinto America Inc. is the selling shareholder in this offering and the concurrent offering. Upon completion of these transactions and prior to this offering, the selling shareholder will own all of our issued and outstanding common stock and preferred stock, and we will own Rio Tinto America Inc.'s western U.S. coal business, other than the Colowyo mine. See "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements."

        The selling shareholder is selling             shares of common stock, representing             % of the selling shareholder's shares of common stock in this offering, and              shares of our             % Series A Mandatory Convertible Preferred Voting Stock in the concurrent offering, representing all of its    % Series A Mandatory Convertible Preferred Voting Stock. The selling shareholder will retain approximately             % of our shares of common stock, all of which will be subject to a Registration Rights Agreement between us and the selling shareholder.

        We will not receive any of the proceeds from the shares of common stock sold by the selling shareholder in this offering or from the shares of the             % Series A Mandatory Convertible Preferred Voting Stock sold in the concurrent offering.

        The underwriters have an option to purchase a maximum of             additional shares of common stock from the selling shareholder to cover over-allotments of shares of common stock.

        Investing in our common stock involves risks. See "Risk Factors" on page 18.

 
  Price to
Public
  Underwriting
Discounts and
Commissions
  Proceeds to
the Selling
Shareholder
 
Per Share   $     $     $    
Total   $     $     $    

        Delivery of the shares of common stock will be made on or about                           , 2008.

        Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Credit Suisse

The date of this prospectus is                           , 2008.


GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
  Page

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

  1

RISK FACTORS

  18

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

  47

USE OF PROCEEDS

  49

DIVIDEND POLICY

  49

SEPARATION TRANSACTIONS AND RELATED AGREEMENTS

  50

CAPITALIZATION

  59

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

  61

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA

  72

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

  77

THE COAL INDUSTRY

  101

BUSINESS

  109

ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER REGULATORY MATTERS

  127

MANAGEMENT

  137

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

  156

PRINCIPAL AND SELLING SHAREHOLDERS

  159

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

  160

SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE

  169

MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

  171

UNDERWRITING

  175

LEGAL MATTERS

  179

EXPERTS

  179

EXPERTS – COAL RESERVES

  179

WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

  179

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED TERMS

  180

INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  F-1


        You should rely only on the information contained in this document or any free writing prospectus prepared by or on behalf of us or to which we have referred you. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from the information contained in this document or any free writing prospectus prepared by or on behalf of us or to which we have referred you. This document may only be used where it is legal to sell these securities. The information in this document may only be accurate on the date of this document.

Dealer Prospectus Delivery Obligation

        Until                        , 2008 (25 days after the commencement of this offering), all dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealer's obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with respect to unsold allotments or subscriptions.


i


Table of Contents


PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

        This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider before investing in our common stock. You should read the entire prospectus carefully, including the section describing the risks of investing in our common stock under "Risk Factors" and the consolidated financial statements of our predecessor, Rio Tinto Energy America Inc. contained elsewhere in this prospectus before making an investment decision. Some of the statements in this summary constitute forward-looking statements. See "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements." For a reconciliation of our pro forma financial information to our historical financial information, see "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information."

        In this prospectus, unless the context otherwise requires, references to "Cloud Peak Energy," "we," "us," "our" or the "company" refer to Cloud Peak Energy Inc. and its subsidiaries, as in effect assuming that the separation transactions described in this prospectus have occurred.

        We are concurrently offering shares of our common stock and our Series A Preferred Stock. The initial public offering of our common stock is conditioned upon the offering of our Series A Preferred Stock, and the offering of our Series A Preferred Stock is conditioned upon the initial public offering of our common stock. Unless the context requires otherwise, in this prospectus the term "offering" refers to both our offering of common stock and our offering of Series A Preferred Stock.

        Certain industry and other technical terms used throughout this prospectus relating primarily to our business, including terms related to the coal industry, coal reserves, mining equipment and coal regions in the U.S. are defined under "Glossary of Selected Terms" beginning on page 180 of this prospectus.

Cloud Peak Energy Inc.

        We are the second largest producer of coal in the U.S. and in the Powder River Basin, or PRB, based on 2007 coal production. We operate some of the safest mines in the industry. According to data from the Mine Safety and Health Administration, or MSHA, in 2007 we had the lowest employee all injury incident rate among the 5 largest U.S. coal producing companies. We operate solely in the PRB, the lowest cost coal producing region of the major coal producing regions in the U.S., and operate three of the five largest coal mines in the region and in the U.S. Our operations include four wholly-owned surface coal mines, three of which are in Wyoming and one in Montana, and we own a 50.0% interest in another surface coal mine in Montana. We produce sub-bituminous steam coal with low sulfur content and sell our coal primarily to electric utilities. Steam coal is primarily consumed by electric utilities and industrial customers as fuel for electricity generation. In 2007, the coal we produced generated approximately 6.0% of the electricity produced in the U.S.

        Prior to the completion of this offering and the concurrent offering of our    % Series A Mandatory Convertible Preferred Voting Stock, or our Series A Preferred Stock, a series of transactions will be taken to separate certain Colorado-based coal, certain non-coal and other U.S. assets from Rio Tinto America Inc.'s, or Rio Tinto America's, western U.S. coal business. We will own Rio Tinto America's western U.S. coal business except for the Colowyo coal mine in Colorado. Due to the terms, conditions and other restrictions contained in the existing financing arrangements with respect to the Colowyo mine, the Colowyo mine will not be transferred to Cloud Peak Energy. Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited, collectively, Rio Tinto, is one of the largest mining companies in the world.

        For the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, excluding Colowyo and other non-coal business, we:

1


Table of Contents

        The tables below summarize the tons of coal produced and proven and probable coal reserves by mine as of December 31, 2007 and other data regarding our controlled coal:

Mine
  Tons Produced in 2007   Proven and Probable
Coal Reserves
 
 
  (in millions)
  (nearest million)
 

Antelope

    34.5     358  

Cordero Rojo

    40.5     266  

Jacobs Ranch

    38.1     423  

Spring Creek

    15.7     325  

Decker(1)

    3.5     7  
           

Total

    132.3     1,378  
           

Non-reserve Coal Deposits
  Million Tons  

Additional Acquired LBA Tonnage in April 2008 (according to BLM estimates)(1)

    288  

Other Non-reserve Coal Deposits (as of December 31, 2007)

    104  

        Our business and operations, including our strengths and strategy listed below, are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including risks related to coal prices and mining operations, coal consumption, including electricity demand, and economic and financial conditions, among others, any or all of which could materially and adversely affect our business and market position. See "Risk Factors" beginning on page 18 of this prospectus.

Our Strengths

        We believe that the following strengths enhance our market position:

         We are the second largest coal producer in the U.S. and in the PRB and have a significant reserve base.    Based on 2007 production of 132.3 million tons, we are the second largest coal producer in the U.S. and in the PRB. As of September 30, 2008, we controlled approximately 1.7 billion tons of coal, consisting of approximately 1.4 billion tons of proven and probable coal reserves and 104 million tons of non-reserve coal deposits as of December 31, 2007, and approximately 288 million tons of additional non-reserve coal deposits, according to Bureau of Land Management, or BLM, estimates, that we acquired in April 2008. Our future success and growth will depend on our ability to acquire additional coal that is economically recoverable.

         We operate highly productive mines in the PRB, the lowest cost coal producing region of the major coal producing regions in the U.S.    All of our mines are located in the PRB, which is the lowest cost coal producing region of the major coal producing regions in the U.S. We believe that our large PRB mines provide us with significant economies of scale. We benefit from the fact that our mines are among the lowest cost and highest producing mines in the U.S. However, our coal mining operations are subject to numerous operating risks that are beyond our control which could result in materially increased operating expenses or decreased production levels.

         Our acquisition of additional LBAs and surface rights and our substantial capital investments in our mines in recent years have positioned us well for the future.    We have focused on strategic acquisitions and subsequent expansions of large, low operating cost, low sulfur operations in the PRB

2


Table of Contents


and replacement of, and additions to, our reserves through the federal coal leasing process, also known as the Lease by Application, or LBA, process and the acquisition of related surface rights. From January 1, 2005 to October 1, 2008, we acquired an additional 283 million tons of reserves as well as the recently acquired the South Maysdorf tract that the BLM estimates to contain 288 million tons of non-reserve coal deposits for a total commitment of $417.0 million, of which we have already made cash installment payments of $146.1 million. From January 1, 2005 to June 30, 2008, we have also made significant investments in our mining facilities and equipment, including significant capital expenditures in our plant facilities and equipment of approximately $552.5 million. These investments have increased our existing mines' capacity and productivity. We have also nominated as LBAs tracts of land that we believe contain, as applied for, approximately 1.8 billon tons of non-reserve coal deposits according to our estimates and subject to final determination by the BLM of the final boundaries and tonnage for these LBA tracts. Accordingly, we believe we are well-positioned for the future through the strategic acquisition of additional LBAs and surface rights. If we are unable to acquire additional LBAs or surface rights, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.

         We are well-positioned to take advantage of strong industry trends in the U.S. and in the PRB region.    Recent increases in U.S. coal consumption have been driven primarily by increased use of existing electricity generation capacity and the construction of new coal-fired power plants. We expect to the extent that the capabilities for shipping large volumes of western U.S. coal to eastern U.S. markets continue to improve, PRB coal may increasingly be substituted for eastern U.S. coal, which is currently in short supply due to increased export demand and production constraints. In addition, increasingly stringent air quality laws and the related cost of scrubbers may favor low sulfur PRB coal over other types of coal, creating additional domestic demand for PRB coal. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, or EIA, annual U.S. coal demand is projected to reach 1.33 billion tons by 2020, compared to demand of 1.13 billion tons in 2007 (which assumes no future federal or state carbon emissions legislation is enacted). The western U.S. is expected to represent approximately 56% of the U.S. coal demand in 2020. This increased demand for coal is driven by an increased demand for electricity. If the increased demand for electricity is met by new power plants fueled by alternative energy sources, such as natural gas, or if state or federal mandates are implemented to support or mandate the use of alternative energy sources, these strong industry trends may not continue.

         Our employee-related liabilities are low for our industry.    We only operate surface mines. As a result, while we are exposed to certain health claims and post-retirement liabilities, such as black-lung disease, this exposure is lower relative to some of our publicly traded competitors that operate underground mines. Our pension obligations were fully funded at the end of 2007. As part of our separation from Rio Tinto America, obligations for pension and post-retirement welfare for active employees will be retained by us, and obligations for employees who have retired as of the date of our separation from Rio Tinto America will be retained by Rio Tinto America.

         We have a strong safety and environmental record.    We operate some of the industry's safest mines. According to data from MSHA in 2007 we had the lowest employee all injury incident rate among the 5 largest U.S. coal producing companies. All of the mines we operate are ISO 14001 certified, and we are committed to maintaining a system that controls and reduces the environmental impacts of mining operations. We have also won numerous state and federal awards for our strong safety and environmental record.

         Our senior management team has extensive industry experience.    Our senior management team has significant work experience in the mining and energy industries, with on average    years of relevant mining experience. Most members of our senior management team gained this experience through various positions held within Rio Tinto and its subsidiaries, collectively, the Rio Tinto Group.

3


Table of Contents

Our Strategy

        Our business strategy is to:

         Capitalize on favorable U.S. and worldwide coal industry market conditions.    Growth in domestic coal consumption and a sharp rise in U.S. coal exports, particularly from the eastern U.S., have resulted in coal prices in recent periods significantly above the historical averages. As higher Btu eastern U.S. coal is shipped to international markets for steam and metallurgical use, and to the extent that the capabilities for shipping large volumes of western U.S. coal to eastern U.S. markets continue to improve, PRB coal may increasingly be substituted for eastern U.S. coal, which is currently in short supply due to increased export demand and production constraints. While only a small percentage of PRB coal is currently exported, recent interest from foreign buyers is increasing, including for higher Btu coal from our Spring Creek mine in Montana. No assurance can be given that these recent trends in the coal industry will continue.

         Continue to build our reserves.    We have focused on strategic acquisitions and subsequent expansions of large, low cost, low sulfur operations in the PRB and replacement of, and additions to, our reserves through the acquisition of companies, mines and reserves. We will continue to seek to increase our reserve position by acquiring federal coal through the LBA process and by purchasing surface rights for land adjoining our current operations in Wyoming and Montana. We have applications outstanding for four LBAs to be bid over the next three years, that cover, as applied for, approximately 1.8 billion tons of non-reserve coal deposits according to our estimates and subject to final determination by the BLM of the final boundaries and tonnage for these LBA tracts. We will continue to explore additional opportunities to increase our reserve base, however, if we are unable to do so our market share will decline.

         Focus on operating efficiency and leverage our economies of scale.    We will seek to control our costs by continuing to improve our operating efficiency. Following this offering and our separation from Rio Tinto America, we will remain the second largest producer of coal in the U.S. based on 2007 production statistics. We believe we will continue to benefit from significant economies of scale through the integrated management and operation of our four wholly-owned mines, although our results as a separate stand-alone company could be significantly different from our historical financial results as part of the Rio Tinto Group. We have historically improved our existing operations and evaluated and implemented new mining equipment and technologies to improve our efficiency. Our large fleet of mining equipment, information technology systems and coordinated equipment utilization and maintenance management functions allows us to enhance our efficiency. Our experienced and well-trained workforce is key in identifying and implementing business improvement initiatives.

         Leverage our excellence in safety and environmental compliance.    We operate some of the safest coal mines in the U.S. We have also achieved recognized standards of environmental stewardship. We continue to implement safety measures and environmental initiatives to promote safe operating practices and improved environmental stewardship. We believe the ability to minimize injuries and maintain our focus on environmental compliance improves our productivity, lowers our costs and helps us attract and retain our employees.

         Opportunistically pursue acquisitions that will create value and expand our core business.    We intend to pursue acquisition opportunities that are consistent with our business strategy and that we believe will create value for our shareholders. We may be unable to successfully integrate these acquired companies or realize the benefits we anticipate from an acquisition.

Coal Market Outlook

        Coal markets and coal prices are influenced by a number of factors and can vary significantly by region. Coal consumption in the U.S. and particularly from the PRB has been at historic highs, driven

4


Table of Contents


in recent periods by several market dynamics and trends, which may or may not continue, including the following:

         Continued strong demand in the U.S. steam coal market.    Domestic demand for steam coal continues to be strong, driven primarily by growth in electricity demand, which is expected to increase at an average annual rate of 1.1% from 2007 through 2020, according to the EIA (which assumes no future federal or state carbon emissions legislation is enacted and assumes a significant number of additional coal-fired power plants will be built during the period). In recent months, there has been a slow down in electricity demand due to recent market conditions. An increase in the number of new power plants plus increased utilization rates by existing power plants are projected by the EIA to be the key drivers of demand. However, a smaller number of plants than projected may be built and existing plants may not be able to significantly increase capacity or utilization rates.

         Increased international demand, growing export market and increased demand from U.S. steel market.    International demand for coal continues to be driven by rapid growth in electrical power generation capacity in Asia, particularly in China and India. China and India represented approximately 44% of total world coal consumption in 2005 and are expected to account for approximately 50% by 2030, according to the EIA. During the first half of 2008, there was also a surge in demand for U.S. coal in Europe. Additionally, demand for metallurgical coal needed to produce steel has continued to increase. This demand is diverting coal that could be sold as steam coal into the metallurgical coal market. We expect to the extent that the capabilities for shipping large volumes of western U.S. coal to eastern U.S. markets continue to improve, PRB coal may increasingly be substituted for eastern U.S. coal, which is currently in short supply due to increased export demand and production constraints. Decreased international demand for coal or, alternatively, increased international supply of coal could adversely affect the U.S. export market and the potential use of PRB coal as a substitute in other U.S. markets.

         Changes in U.S. regional production.    Coal production in the eastern U.S., other than the Illinois Basin, has declined in recent years because of production difficulties, reserve degradation and difficulties acquiring permits needed to conduct mining operations. Shortages and decreases in supply in the eastern U.S., including due to increasing demand in the foreign markets, continue to affect pricing in the eastern U.S.

         Coal remains a cost-competitive energy source relative to alternative fossil fuels and other alternative energy sources.    Coal continues to be a low cost source of energy relative to its substitutes because of the high prices for alternative fossil fuels. Coal also has a lower all-in cost relative to other alternative energy sources, such as nuclear, hydroelectric, wind and solar power. PRB coal in particular remains a cost-competitive energy source because it exists in greater abundance and is easier and cheaper to mine than coal produced in other regions. Changes in the prices for other fossil fuels or alternative energy sources in the future could affect the price of, and demand for, coal.

         Increased prices for PRB coal.    Although U.S. coal markets have recently experienced significant volatility, spot prices for PRB coal have more than doubled from $6.15 to $14.65 per ton for 8,800 Btu coal from January 2005 to September 2008. However, prices in September 2008 are down from a high of $15.75 in June 2008. Market prices for 8,800 Btu coal we have received recently reached more than $20/ton for deliveries in 2010. The prices for alternative fossil fuels, such as oil and natural gas, have been at historic highs in recent periods, and future changes in the prices for these fossil fuels may affect the price of coal. For example, recent declines in oil prices from historic highs may impact the price of coal. See "Risk Factors—Coal prices are subject to change and a substantial or extended decline in prices could materially and adversely affect our revenues and results of operations, as well as the value of our coal reserves."

         Increasingly Stringent Air Quality Regulations.    A series of more stringent requirements relating to particulate matter, ozone, haze, mercury, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and other air pollutants have

5


Table of Contents


been proposed and/or enacted by federal and/or state regulatory authorities in recent years. As a result of some of these regulations, increased demand for western U.S. coal has occurred as coal-fired electricity producers have switched from bituminous coal to lower sulfur sub-bituminous coal. The PRB has benefited from this switching and its market share has increased accordingly. However, increasingly stringent air regulations may lead some coal-fired plants to install additional pollution control equipment, such as scrubbers, thereby reducing the need for low sulfur coal. Considerable uncertainty is associated with these air emission regulations, a few of which, including the Clean Air Interstate Rule, or CAIR, and the Clean Air Mercury Rule, or CAMR, have been vacated by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. As a result, it is not possible to determine the impact of such regulatory initiatives on coal demand nationwide but they could be material. See "Risk Factors—Extensive environmental regulations, including existing and potential future regulatory requirements relating to air emissions, affect our customers and could reduce the demand for coal as a fuel source and cause coal prices and sales of our coal to materially decline," "—Because we produce and sell coal with a low sulfur content, a reduction in the price of sulfur dioxide emission allowances or increased use of technologies to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions could materially and adversely affect the demand for our coal and our results of operations" and "Environmental and Other Regulatory Matters."

        See "The Coal Industry" and "The Coal Industry—Special Note Regarding EIA Market Data and Projections."

Our Corporate History

        Rio Tinto Energy America Inc., or RTEA, is considered to be our predecessor for accounting purposes and its consolidated financial statements are our historical consolidated financial statements. The Rio Tinto Group initially formed RTEA in 1993 as Kennecott Coal Company in connection with the acquisitions of Northern Energy Resource Company, Inc., or NERCO and the Spring Creek coal mine, the Antelope coal mine and a 50% interest in the Decker coal mine operated by a third-party mine operator. In 1993, Kennecott Coal Company also acquired the Cordero coal mine from Elk River Resources, Inc., and in 1997, it acquired the Caballo Rojo coal mine from the Drummond Company. These mines are currently operated together as the Cordero Rojo coal mine. In 1994, Kennecott Coal Company was renamed Kennecott Energy and Coal Company. Also in 1994, Kennecott Energy and Coal Company acquired the Colowyo coal mine in Colorado from the W.R. Grace Company. The Colowyo coal mine will not be transferred to Cloud Peak Energy in connection with this offering. In 1998, Kennecott Energy and Coal Company acquired the Jacobs Ranch coal mine from the Kerr-McGee Corporation. In 2006, Kennecott Energy and Coal Company was renamed Rio Tinto Energy America Inc., as part of Rio Tinto's global branding initiative.

        Through a series of transactions, Rio Tinto America has separated certain Colorado-based coal, certain non-coal and other U.S. assets from its western U.S. coal business. RTEA and Rio Tinto Energy America Services Company, or RTEASC, currently own and operate Rio Tinto America's western U.S. coal business except for the Colowyo coal mine in Colorado. Due to the terms, conditions and other restrictions contained in the existing financing arrangements with respect to the Colowyo mine, the Colowyo mine will not be transferred to Cloud Peak Energy.

        See "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements" for additional information regarding these transactions.

Company Information

        Our principal executive office is currently located at 505 S. Gillette Avenue, Gillette, Wyoming 82718, and our telephone number at that address is (307) 687-6000. Following the completion of this offering, we intend to maintain a website at www.cloudpeakenergy.com. The information that will be contained on, or that will be accessible through, our website is not part of this prospectus.

6


Table of Contents


        Cloud Peak Energy and the Cloud Peak Energy logo are trademarks and service marks of Cloud Peak Energy Inc. All other trademarks, service marks or trade names appearing in this prospectus are owned by their respective holders.

Presentation of Our Coal Data and Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information and Coal Market Data

Our Historical Financial Information

        Unless otherwise indicated, historical references contained in this prospectus in "—Summary Actual and Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Data," "Selected Consolidated Financial and Operating Data," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations," and our historical consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this prospectus, relate to RTEA and include results from the Colowyo mine and the uranium mining venture, which will not be transferred to Cloud Peak Energy in connection with this offering.

Pro Forma Financial Information

        When we refer to our pro forma financial information we are giving effect to:

Our Coal Data

        References to our coal production, sales and purchases and our reserves, contained in this prospectus in "Prospectus Summary," "The Coal Industry" and "Business," unless otherwise indicated, exclude the Colowyo mine and the uranium mining venture which will not be transferred to Cloud Peak Energy in connection with this offering.

        References contained in this prospectus to tons of coal controlled by us as of September 30, 2008 give effect to our coal sales since December 31, 2007.

        References to BLM estimates are given as of the date we acquired the lease for the related LBA tract.

        Through our indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary, we currently hold a 50% interest in the Decker mine in Montana through a joint-venture agreement with an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Level 3 Communications, Inc., or Level 3. The Decker mine is managed by a third-party mine operator. Information related to our coal production, reserves, purchases and revenues, contained in this prospectus and information in our consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this prospectus, unless otherwise indicated, includes amounts reflecting our 50% interest in the Decker mine.

7


Table of Contents

Coal Market Data

        Market data used in this prospectus has been obtained from governmental and independent industry sources and publications, such as the U.S. Energy Information Administration, or EIA, the National Mining Association, or NMA, and the Mine Safety and Health Administration, or MSHA, and, unless otherwise indicated, is based on data and reports published in 2007 or 2008 but may relate to prior years. We have not independently verified the data obtained from these sources and we cannot assure you of the accuracy or completeness of the data. In addition, industry projections of the EIA are subject to numerous assumptions and methodologies chosen by the EIA, including that laws and regulations in effect at the time of the projections remain unchanged and that future federal or state carbon emissions legislation has not been enacted. Forward-looking information obtained from these sources is subject to the same qualifications and the additional uncertainties regarding the other forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus. See "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" and "The Coal Industry—Special Note Regarding EIA Market Data and Projections."

8


Table of Contents


The Offering

Common stock offered by Rio Tinto America

                          shares

Common stock to be outstanding after this offering

                          shares

Common stock to be held by Rio Tinto America after the offering

                          shares

Use of proceeds

  We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale by Rio Tinto America of our common stock in this offering or the Series A Preferred Stock in the concurrent offering. See "Use of Proceeds."

Dividend policy

  We currently do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock. See "Dividend Policy."

Risk factors

  See "Risk Factors" on page 18 of this prospectus for a discussion of factors you should carefully consider before deciding to invest in our common stock.

New York Stock Exchange symbol

  "CLD"

Concurrent offering of Series A Preferred Stock

         shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, which, unless previously converted, will automatically convert on                        , 2011 into between            and            shares of our common stock, subject to anti-dilution adjustments.

Conditions

  The offering of the Series A Preferred Stock is conditioned upon the completion of this offering.

  This offering is conditioned upon the completion of the offering of the Series A Preferred Stock.

        Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus:



        Depending on market conditions at the time of pricing of this offering and other considerations, Rio Tinto America may sell fewer or more shares than the number set forth on the cover page of this prospectus and may sell fewer or more shares in the concurrent offering.

9


Table of Contents


SUMMARY ACTUAL AND PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

        The following table provides a summary of our actual and pro forma consolidated financial data for the periods indicated. This information should be read in conjunction with the sections of this prospectus entitled "Selected Consolidated Financial and Operating Data," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results from Operations," and our historical consolidated and unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.

        RTEA is considered to be our predecessor for accounting purposes and its consolidated financial statements are our historical consolidated financial statements. Our historical consolidated financial statements include financial information for certain operations that will not be transferred to Cloud Peak Energy in connection with this offering, including the Colowyo coal mine which represented 8.9% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007. As a result, our historical consolidated financial statements are not comparable to the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information included elsewhere in this prospectus or to the results investors should expect after the offering. To date, Cloud Peak Energy Inc. has had no operations. As described in "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements," through a merger transaction RTEA, our predecessor, and RTEASC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto, will become our wholly owned subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements of RTEA are provided elsewhere in this prospectus.

        We have derived the actual consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 from the audited consolidated financial statements of RTEA, included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the actual consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2005 from the unaudited consolidated financial data of RTEA, not included in this prospectus. We have derived the actual consolidated financial data as of June 30, 2008 and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 from the unaudited consolidated financial statements of RTEA, included elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited consolidated financial information was prepared on a basis consistent with that used in preparing our audited consolidated financial statements and includes all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring items, that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the unaudited periods. The interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of operations for a full fiscal year.

        Prior to the consummation of the offering, our consolidated financial statements were prepared on a carve-out basis from our ultimate parent company, Rio Tinto and its subsidiaries. The carve-out consolidated financial statements include allocations of corporate, general and administrative expenses and Rio Tinto headquarters overhead expenses. We do not expect to continue to incur some of these charges as a stand-alone public company. These allocations were based upon various assumptions and estimates and actual results may differ from these allocations, assumptions and estimates. However, the carve-out consolidated financial statements do not reflect additional expenses we expect to incur as a stand-alone public company. Accordingly, the carve-out consolidated financial statements should not be relied upon as being representative of our financial position or operating results had we operated on a stand-alone basis, nor are they representative of our financial position or operating results following the offering.

        We have derived the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial data as of June 30, 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2007 and for the six months ended June 30, 2008, from the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information, included elsewhere in this prospectus. See "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information." The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information is based on our actual consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited pro forma adjustments are based on available information and certain assumptions that we believe are reasonable and are described below in the accompanying notes. The

10


Table of Contents


unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2008 and the unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 are presented on a pro forma basis to give effect, in each case, to the following adjustments as if they occurred on June 30, 2008 for balance sheet adjustments and January 1, 2007 for statement of operations adjustments:

        The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial data is for informational purposes only, and is not intended to represent what our results of operations would be after giving effect to the offering, or to indicate our results of operations for any future period. Therefore, investors should not place undue reliance on the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial data.

11


Table of Contents

Summary Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Data
(dollars in thousands, except share amounts)

 
  For the Year Ended
December 31,
  For the Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
  2007   2008  
 
  Pro Forma
  Pro Forma
 

Statement of Operations Data

             

Revenues

  $ 1,419,802   $ 789,739  

Costs and expenses

             
 

Cost of product sold (exclusive of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion, shown separately below)

    1,078,304     606,909  
 

Depreciation and depletion

    134,017     71,302  
 

Amortization(2)

    42,312     28,403  
 

Accretion

    15,174     7,171  
 

Exploration costs

    3,530     1,404  
 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

    51,931     32,473  
           

Total costs and expenses

    1,325,268     747,662  
           
   

Total other expense

             
           

Income before income tax provision, earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates and minority interest

             
 

Income tax provision

             
 

Earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

    2,462     2,210  
           

Net income (loss)

             
           
 

Less: Series A Preferred Stock dividends

             
           

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

  $     $    
           

Net income (loss) per share:

             
 

Net income (loss) per share

             
   

Basic

  $     $    
           
   

Diluted

  $     $    
           

Weighted average shares outstanding

             
   

Basic

             
           
   

Diluted

             
           

 

 
  As of
June 30,
 
 
  2008  
 
  Pro Forma
 

Balance Sheet Data

       

Cash and cash equivalents

  $    

Accounts receivable, net

    88,486  

Inventories, net

    71,513  

Property, plant and equipment, net

    1,246,489  

Intangible assets, net

    66,530  

Total long term debt(5)

       

Total assets

       

Total liabilities

       

Shareholders' equity

       

12


Table of Contents

 
  For the Years Ended
December 31,
  For the Six
Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
  2007   2008  
 
  Pro Forma
  Pro Forma
 

Other Data

             
 

EBITDA(6)

             
 

Adjusted EBITDA(7)

             
 

Tons of coal produced (millions)(12)

    132.3     65.4  
 

Tons of coal purchased for resale (millions)(12)

    6.3     3.0  
 

Tons of coal sold (millions)(8)(12)

    138.6     68.4  

Summary Actual Consolidated Financial Data
(dollars in thousands, except share amounts)

 
  For the Years Ended December 31,   For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
 
  2005   2006   2007   2007   2008  
 
  Actual
  Actual
  Actual
  Actual
  Actual
 

Statement of Operations Data

                               

Revenues(1)

  $ 1,179,643   $ 1,424,244   $ 1,558,721   $ 726,713   $ 845,140  

Costs and expenses

                               
 

Cost of product sold (exclusive of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion, shown separately below)

    878,847     1,081,160     1,191,787     567,666     670,671  
 

Depreciation and depletion

    91,849     122,254     139,167     67,183     73,465  
 

Amortization(2)

    45,279     44,577     42,312     16,871     28,403  
 

Accretion

    11,485     14,334     15,665     7,244     8,294  
 

Exploration costs

    7,037     5,890     10,130     2,943     1,404  
 

Selling, general and administrative expenses(3)

    48,130     56,873     61,906     27,653     39,976  
 

Asset impairment charges(4)

            18,297          
                       

Total costs and expenses

    1,082,627     1,325,088     1,479,264     689,560     822,213  
                       
   

Total other expense

    (48,269 )   (52,849 )   (46,586 )   (23,487 )   (16,668 )
                       

Income before income tax provision and earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates

    48,747     46,307     32,871     13,666     6,259  
 

Income tax provision

    (11,194 )   (6,894 )   (2,489 )   (1,043 )   (1,596 )
 

Earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

    2,209     (1,435 )   2,462     863     2,210  
                       

Net income

  $ 39,762   $ 37,978   $ 32,844   $ 13,486   $ 6,873  
                       

Net income per share—basic and diluted:

                               
 

Net income per share

  $ 39,762   $ 37,978   $ 32,844   $ 13,486   $ 6,873  
                       

Weighted average shares outstanding

    1     1     1     1     1  
                       

13


Table of Contents

 
  As of December 31,   As of
June 30,
 
 
  2005   2006   2007   2008  
 
  Actual
  Actual
  Actual
  Actual
 

Balance Sheet Data

                         

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 11,366   $ 19,597   $ 23,632   $ 16,507  

Accounts receivable, net

    90,780     107,618     121,754     94,717  

Inventories, net

    89,141     64,192     76,023     83,235  

Property, plant and equipment, net

    1,223,322     1,295,388     1,344,246     1,325,536  

Intangible assets, net

    186,467     137,245     94,933     66,530  

Total assets

    1,673,483     1,708,231     1,765,012     1,726,647  

Total long-term debt(5)

    823,620     812,258     720,389     731,777  

Total liabilities

    1,450,262     1,474,092     1,477,413     1,431,045  

Shareholder's equity

    223,221     234,139     287,599     295,602  

 

 
  For the Years Ended December 31,   For the Six
Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
  2005   2006   2007   2007   2008  
 
  Actual
  Actual
  Actual
  Actual
  Actual
 

Other Data

                               
 

EBITDA(9)

  $ 247,480   $ 278,776   $ 279,162   $ 129,360   $ 135,008  
 

Adjusted EBITDA(10)

                               
 

Tons of coal produced (millions)(11)

    127.5     138.1     137.9     66.9     67.7  
 

Tons of coal purchased for resale (millions)(11)

    4.9     5.3     6.3     2.4     3.0  
 

Tons of coal sold (millions)(8)(11)

    132.4     143.4     144.2     69.3     70.7  

(1)
Freight revenues accounted for 4.9%, 3.9% and 4.0% of our total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and 4.0% and 5.5% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively. As a general matter, our customers pay their own freight costs. We pay the freight costs, however, for shipping coal to some of our customers and in these cases the customers pay us in respect of these freight costs and the payments are included in our revenues. See Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2)
Primarily reflects amortization under our brokerage contract related to the Spring Creek mine.

(3)
Includes corporate allocations of general and administrative costs from Rio Tinto and its subsidiaries of $8.1 million, $11.4 million and $13.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and $5.6 million and $6.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively, and allocations of Rio Tinto headquarters overhead costs of $7.9 million, $6.9 million and $10.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and $5.2 million and $5.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively. The amounts for the six months ended June 30, 2008 also include $10.2 million of costs associated with an initiative to prepare for our initial public offering.

(4)
Asset impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2007 reflects non-recurring capitalized cost of an abandoned enterprise resource planning, or ERP, systems implementation. The ERP systems implementation was a worldwide Rio Tinto initiative designed to align processes, procedures, practices and reporting across all Rio Tinto business units. The implementation would have taken our stand-alone ERP system and moved it to a shared Rio Tinto platform, which could not be transferred to a new stand-alone company. We do not currently use, and will not use following this offering, this ERP system.

14


Table of Contents

(5)
Total long-term debt includes the current and long-term portions of the long-term debt-bonds, long-term debt-related party and long-term debt-other.

(6)
Pro forma EBITDA is derived from the Unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 and six months ended June 30, 2008, included elsewhere in this prospectus. A reconciliation of pro forma EBITDA to pro forma net income for the periods presented, is as follows:

Pro forma
(dollars in thousands)
  For the Year
Ended
December 31,
2007
  For the Six
Months Ended
June 30,
2008
 

Pro forma net income

             

Pro forma depreciation and depletion

    134,017     71,302  

Pro forma accretion

    15,174     7,171  

Pro forma amortization

    42,312     28,403  

Pro forma interest expense

             

Pro forma interest income

    7,303     2,524  

Pro forma income tax provision

             
           

Pro forma EBITDA

  $     $    
           

    See Note 9 below for a discussion of our use of EBITDA.

(7)
Pro forma adjusted EBITDA is defined as pro forma EBITDA as adjusted for the impact of             .

    A reconciliation of pro forma adjusted EBITDA to pro forma EBITDA for the periods presented, is as follows:

Pro forma
(dollars in thousands)
  For the Year
Ended
December 31,
2007
  For the Six
Months Ended
June 30,
2008
 

Pro forma EBITDA

             

  

             

  

             

  

             

  

             
           

Pro forma adjusted EBITDA

  $     $    
           
(8)
Tons of coal sold includes amounts sold under our brokerage contract relating to the Spring Creek mine.

(9)
EBITDA, a performance measure used by management, is defined as net income (loss) plus: interest expense (net of interest income), income tax provision, depreciation and depletion, amortization and accretion as shown in the table below. EBITDA, as presented for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, is not defined under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or U.S. GAAP, and does not purport to be an alternative to net income as a measure of operating performance. Because not all companies use identical calculations, this presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly-titled measures of other companies. We use, and we believe investors benefit from the presentation of, EBITDA in evaluating our operating performance because it provides us and our investors with an additional tool to compare our operating performance on a consistent basis by removing the impact of certain items that

15


Table of Contents

 
  For the Years Ended December 31,   For the Six
Months Ended
June 30,
 
(dollars in thousands)
  2005   2006   2007   2007   2008  

Net income

  $ 39,762   $ 37,978   $ 32,844   $ 13,486   $ 6,873  

Depreciation and depletion

    91,849     122,254     139,167     67,183     73,465  

Amortization

    45,279     44,577     42,312     16,871     28,403  

Accretion

    11,485     14,334     15,665     7,244     8,294  

Interest expense

    49,570     56,568     54,262     27,941     18,991  

Interest income

    (1,659 )   (3,829 )   (7,577 )   (4,408 )   (2,614 )

Income tax provision

    11,194     6,894     2,489     1,043     1,596  
                       

EBITDA

  $ 247,480   $ 278,776   $ 279,162   $ 129,360   $ 135,008  
                       

16


Table of Contents

(10)
Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA plus:            as shown in the table below:

 
  For the Years Ended December 31,   For the Six
Months Ended
June 30,
 
(dollars in thousands)
  2005   2006   2007   2007   2008  

EBITDA

  $ 247,480   $ 278,776   $ 279,162   $ 129,360   $ 135,008  

  

                               

  

                               

  

                               
                       

Adjusted EBITDA

  $     $     $     $     $    
                       
(11)
For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, tons of coal produced, tons of coal purchased for resale and tons of coal sold, includes the Colowyo coal mine, as it was consolidated into our historical consolidated financial statements, as explained above.

(12)
Tons of coal produced, tons of coal purchased for resale and tons of coal sold, on a pro forma basis, exclude activities from the Colowyo mine.

17


Table of Contents


RISK FACTORS

        You should carefully consider the risk factors described below and all other information contained in this prospectus before you decide to invest in our common stock. If any of the following risk factors, as well as other risks and uncertainties that are not currently known to us or that we currently believe are not material, actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Accordingly, the trading price of our securities could decline, and you may lose part or all of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Business

Coal prices are subject to change and a substantial or extended decline in prices could materially and adversely affect our revenues and results of operations, as well as the value of our coal reserves.

        Our revenues and results of operations and the value of our coal reserves are dependent in large measure upon the prices we receive for our coal. Because coal is a commodity, the prices we receive are set by the marketplace. Prices for coal generally tend to be cyclical, and U.S. prices are currently near highs relative to historical prices. The contract prices we may receive in the future for coal depend upon numerous factors beyond our control, including:

        A substantial or extended decline in the prices we receive for our future coal sales contracts could materially and adversely affect us by decreasing our revenues thereby materially and adversely affecting our results of operations.

Our coal mining operations are subject to operating risks that are beyond our control, which could result in materially increased operating expenses and decreased production levels and could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

        We mine coal at surface mining operations located in Wyoming and Montana. Our coal mining operations are subject to conditions or events beyond our control. Because we maintain very little produced coal inventory, these conditions or events could disrupt operations, adversely affect production and shipments and increase the cost of mining at particular mines for varying lengths of

18


Table of Contents


time, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. These conditions and events include, among others:

        These changes, conditions and events may materially increase our cost of mining and delay or halt production at particular mines either permanently or for varying lengths of time.

Competition within the coal production industry and with producers of competing energy sources may materially and adversely affect our ability to sell coal at a favorable price.

        We compete with numerous other coal producers in various regions of the U.S. for domestic sales. International demand for U.S. coal also affects competition within our industry. The demand for U.S. coal exports depends upon a number of factors outside of our control, including the overall demand for electricity in foreign markets, currency exchange rates, ocean freight rates, port and shipping capacity, the demand for foreign-produced steel, both in foreign markets and in the U.S. market, general economic conditions in foreign countries, technological developments and environmental and other governmental regulations. Foreign demand for eastern U.S. coal has increased in recent periods. If foreign demand for U.S. coal were to decline, this decline could cause competition among coal

19


Table of Contents


producers for sales in the U.S. to intensify, potentially resulting in significant downward pressure on domestic coal prices, including in the PRB.

        In addition to competing with other coal producers, we compete generally with producers of other fuels, such as natural gas and oil. Prices for competing fuels are currently at historically high levels. A decline in price for these fuels, could cause demand for coal to decrease and adversely affect the price of our coal. If alternative energy sources, such as wind or solar, become more cost-competitive on an overall basis, including capital expenditures, and conversion, storage and transmission costs, demand for coal could decrease and the price of coal could be materially and adversely affected, including in the PRB.

Excess production and production capacity in the coal production industry could put downward pressure on coal prices and, as a result, materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability.

        During the mid-1970s and early 1980s, increased demand for coal attracted new investors to the coal industry in the PRB, spurred the development of new mines and resulted in additional production capacity throughout the industry, all of which led to increased competition and lower coal prices. Recent increases in coal prices have encouraged the development of expanded capacity by coal producers and may continue to do so. Any resulting overcapacity and increased production could materially reduce coal prices and therefore materially reduce our revenues and profitability.

Decreases in demand for electricity resulting from economic, weather changes or other conditions could adversely affect coal prices and materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

        Our coal is primarily used as fuel for electricity generation. Overall economic activity and the associated demands for power by industrial users can have significant effects on overall electricity demand. An economic slowdown can significantly slow the growth of electrical demand and could result in contraction of demand for coal. Declines in international prices for coal generally will impact U.S. prices for coal. Current international demand for coal is being driven, in significant part, by increased demand due to economic growth in China and India as well as other developing countries. We cannot assure you that this growth will continue.

        Weather patterns can also greatly affect electricity demand. Extreme temperatures, both hot and cold, cause increased power usage and, therefore, increased generating requirements from all sources. Mild temperatures, on the other hand, result in lower electrical demand, which allows generators to choose the sources of power generation when deciding which generation sources to dispatch. Any downward pressure on coal prices, due to decreases in overall demand or otherwise, including changes in weather patterns, would materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

The use of alternative energy sources for power generation could reduce coal consumption by U.S. electric power generators, which could result in lower prices for our coal, which could reduce our revenues and materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

        In 2007, approximately 94% of our coal sales were to domestic electric power generators. Domestic electric power generation accounted for approximately 93% of all U.S. coal consumption in 2007, according to the EIA. The amount of coal consumed for U.S. electric power generation is affected by, among other things:


        Gas-fired generation has the potential to displace coal-fired generation, particularly from older, less efficient coal-powered generators. We expect that many of the new power plants needed to meet

20


Table of Contents

increasing demand for electricity generation will be fired by natural gas because gas-fired plants are cheaper to construct and permits to construct these plants are easier to obtain as natural gas is seen as having a lower environmental impact than coal-fired generators. In addition, state and federal mandates for increased use of electricity from renewable energy sources could have an impact on the market for our coal. More than twenty states have enacted legislative mandates requiring electricity suppliers to use renewable energy sources to generate a certain percentage of power. There have been numerous proposals to establish a similar uniform, national standard although none of these proposals have been enacted to date. Possible advances in technologies and incentives, such as tax credits, to enhance the economics of renewable energy sources could make these sources more competitive with coal. Any reduction in the amount of coal consumed by North American electric power generators could reduce the price of coal that we mine and sell, thereby reducing our revenues and materially and adversely affecting our business and results of operations.

If we are unable to acquire or develop additional coal reserves that are economically recoverable, our profitability and future success and growth may be materially and adversely affected.

        Our profitability depends substantially on our ability to mine, in a cost-effective manner, coal reserves that possess the quality characteristics desired by our customers. Because our reserves decline as we mine our coal, our future success and growth depend upon our ability to acquire additional coal that is economically recoverable. If we fail to acquire or develop additional reserves, our existing reserves will eventually be depleted. For example, due to certain of Decker's identified non-reserve coal deposits being currently uneconomical to develop, the Decker management committee has approved plans to reduce mining rates and close the Decker mine at the end of 2012. As a result, to maintain market share and our competitive position, we will need to acquire significant additional coal through the federal competitive leasing process that can be mined on an economically recoverable basis. We also lease a smaller portion of our reserves from the states of Montana and Wyoming and from private third parties. See "—Because most of the coal in the vicinity of our mines is owned by the U.S. federal government, our future success and growth could be materially and adversely affected if we are unable to acquire additional reserves through the federal competitive leasing process" and "—We may be unable to acquire state leases for coal reserves in the State of Wyoming, or to do so on a cost-effective basis, which could materially and adversely affect our business strategy and growth plans."

        Our ability to obtain additional coal reserves in the future could also be limited by the availability of cash we generate from our operations or available financing, restrictions under our credit arrangements, competition from other coal companies for properties, the lack of suitable acquisition or LBA opportunities or the inability to acquire coal properties or LBAs on commercially reasonable terms. In addition, we may not be able to mine future reserves as profitably as we do at our current operations.

Because most of the coal in the vicinity of our mines is owned by the U.S. federal government, our future success and growth could be materially and adversely affected if we are unable to acquire additional reserves through the federal competitive leasing process.

        Most of the coal in the vicinity of our mines is owned by the U.S. federal government. Accordingly, the LBA process is the most significant means of acquiring additional reserves. There is no requirement that the federal government lease coal subject to an LBA, lease its coal at all or give preference to any LBA applicant. In the current coal pricing environment, LBAs are becoming increasingly more competitive and expensive to obtain, and the review process to submit an LBA for bid continues to lengthen. We expect that this trend may continue. The increasing size of potential LBA tracts may make it easier for new mining operators to enter the market on economical terms and may, therefore, increase competition for LBAs. Increased opposition from non-governmental organizations and other third parties may also lengthen, delay, or complicate the LBA process. In order

21


Table of Contents


to win a lease in the LBA process and acquire additional coal, our bid for a coal tract must meet or exceed the fair market value of the coal based on the internal estimates of the Bureau of Land Management, or BLM, which they do not publish. We have maintained a history of timely payments related to our LBAs. If we are unable to maintain our "good payor" status, we would be required to seek bonding for any remaining payments. If we are required to purchase bonding for lease obligations this would significantly increase our costs and materially and adversely affect our profitability. See "Business—Coal Reserves" for a more detailed description of the LBA process.

        The LBA process also requires us to acquire rights to mine from surface owners overlying the coal, and these rights are becoming increasingly more difficult and costly to acquire. Certain federal regulations provide a specific class of surface owners, also known as qualified surface owners, or QSOs, with the ability to prohibit the BLM from leasing its coal. If the land overlying a coal tract is owned by a QSO, federal laws prohibit us from leasing the coal tract without first securing surface rights to the land, or purchasing the surface rights from the QSO, which would allow us to conduct our mining operations. This right of QSOs allows them to exercise significant influence over negotiations to acquire surface rights and can delay the LBA process or ultimately prevent the acquisition of an LBA. If we are unable to successfully negotiate access rights with QSOs at a price and on terms acceptable to us, we may be unable to acquire LBAs for coal on land owned by the QSO. If the prices to acquire land owned by QSOs increase, it could materially and adversely affect our profitability.

We may be unable to acquire state leases for coal reserves in the State of Wyoming, or to do so on a cost-effective basis, which could materially and adversely affect our business strategy and growth plans.

        We acquire a small percentage of our reserves through state leasing processes. Not including the Decker mine, we typically lease approximately 10-12% of our reserves from state leases, the majority of which involve our Spring Creek mine. Nearly all of the state leases in Wyoming have already been acquired by various mining operations in the PRB, including ours. If, as part of our growth strategy, we desire to expand our operations into areas requiring state leases, we may be required to negotiate with competing Wyoming mining operations to acquire these reserves. If we are unable to do so on a cost-effective basis, our business strategy could be adversely affected. We do not typically acquire state leases in Montana significantly in advance of mining operations due to the complexity of the leasing process in Montana.

Conflicts of interest with competing holders of mineral rights could materially and adversely affect our ability to mine coal or do so on a cost-effective basis.

        In addition to federal coal leases through the competitive leasing process, the federal government also leases rights to other minerals such as coalbed methane, natural gas and oil reserves in the western U.S., including in the PRB. Some of these minerals are located on, or are adjacent to, some of our coal reserves and LBA areas, potentially creating conflicting interests between us and the lessees of those interests. In addition, from time to time we acquire these minerals ourselves to prevent conflicting interests from arising. If, however, conflicting interests arise and we do not acquire the competing mineral rights, we may be required to negotiate our ability to mine with the holder of the competing mineral rights. If we are unable to reach an agreement with these holders, or do so on a cost-effective basis, we may incur increased costs, our ability to mine could be impaired and our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Inaccuracies in our estimates of our coal reserves could result in decreased profitability from lower than expected revenues or higher than expected costs.

        Our future performance depends on, among other things, the accuracy of our estimates of our proven and probable coal reserves. We base our estimates of reserves on engineering, economic and

22


Table of Contents


geological data assembled and analyzed by our internal engineers. In connection with this offering, these estimates were reviewed by John T. Boyd Company, mining and geological consultants, for the year ended December 31, 2007. Non-reserve coal deposit estimates related to our April 2008 LBA were estimated by the BLM and have not been independently reviewed or verified. The amount of non-reserve coal deposits on this LBA, and additional LBAs we may acquire, or contained in our non-reserve coal deposits may be less than the stated estimates. Coal acquired through the LBA process is not included as proven or probable coal reserves unless assessed by our staff of geologists and engineers to verify that such classification is appropriate. Our estimates of proven and probable coal reserves as to both quantity and quality are updated annually to reflect the production of coal from the reserves, updated geological models and mining recovery data, the tonnage contained in new lease areas acquired and estimated costs of production and sales prices. There are numerous factors and assumptions inherent in estimating the quantities and qualities of, and costs to mine, coal reserves, including many factors beyond our control, any one of which may vary considerably from actual results. These factors and assumptions include:

        As a result, estimates of the quantities and qualities of economically recoverable coal attributable to any particular group of properties, classifications of reserves based on risk of recovery, estimated cost of production, and estimates of future net cash flows expected from these properties as prepared by different engineers, or by the same engineers at different times, may vary materially due to changes in the above factors and assumptions. Actual production recovered from identified reserve areas and properties, and revenues and expenditures associated with our mining operations, may vary materially from estimates. Any inaccuracy in our estimates related to our reserves could result in decreased profitability from lower than expected revenues and/or higher than expected costs.

Our business requires substantial capital investment and maintenance expenditures, which we may be unable to provide, and our cost of capital will be higher as a stand-alone company.

        Our business plan and strategy are dependent upon our acquisitions of additional reserves, which require substantial capital expenditures. We also require capital for, among other purposes, acquisition of surface rights, equipment and the development of our mining operations, capital renovations, maintenance and expansions of plants and equipment and compliance with environmental laws and regulations. As part of the Rio Tinto Group, our operations and growth have been funded in large part through capital investments by Rio Tinto America. Upon completion of this offering, we will be an independent company and we will no longer have access to capital from Rio Tinto America or be able to take advantage of the borrowing capacity, assets and consolidated investment grade credit rating of Rio Tinto.

        We will need to develop and maintain our own sources of capital and establish and maintain our own credit rating. On a stand-alone basis, our credit rating will not be investment grade and we will

23


Table of Contents


have a higher cost of capital. To the extent that cash generated internally and cash available under our future credit arrangements are not sufficient to fund capital requirements, we will require additional debt and/or equity financing. Debt or equity financing may not be available or, if available, may not be available on satisfactory terms. If we are unable to obtain additional capital, we will not be able to maintain or increase our existing production rates and we could be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures or change our business strategy, sell assets or restructure or refinance our indebtedness, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.

Our ability to collect payments from our customers could be impaired if their creditworthiness deteriorates.

        We have contracts to supply coal to energy trading and brokering companies under which they purchase the coal for their own account or resell the coal to end users. Our ability to receive payment for coal sold and delivered depends on the continued creditworthiness of our customers. If we determine that a customer is not creditworthy, we may not be required to deliver coal under the customer's coal sales contract. If this occurs, we may decide to sell the customer's coal on the spot market, which may be at prices lower than the contracted price, or we may be unable to sell the coal at all. Furthermore, the bankruptcy of any of our customers could materially and adversely affect our financial position. In addition, our customer base may change with deregulation as utilities sell their power plants to their non-regulated affiliates or third parties that may be less creditworthy, thereby increasing the risk we bear for customer payment default. These new power plant owners may have credit ratings that are below investment grade, or may become below investment grade after we enter into contracts with them. In addition, competition with other coal suppliers could force us to extend credit to customers and on terms that could increase the risk of payment default.

Our indebtedness could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition and prevent us from fulfilling our financial obligations.

        As of June 30, 2008, we had approximately $647.9 million of outstanding amounts owed to the Rio Tinto Group including $541.9 million under our revolving credit facility with Rio Tinto America. The debt owed under the revolving credit facility with Rio Tinto America was contributed to the capital of RTEA on September 24, 2008. Any remaining amounts will be contributed to the capital of RTEA immediately prior to this offering. In connection with this offering, we intend to enter into a new credit agreement and/or undertake other financing transactions with one or more lenders for approximately $                 million. Any outstanding indebtedness could have important consequences to us, such as:

24


Table of Contents

        If we further increase our indebtedness, the related risks that we now face, including those described above, could intensify. In addition to the principal repayments on our outstanding debt, we have other demands on our cash resources, including capital expenditures and operating expenses. Our ability to pay our debt depends upon our operating performance. In particular, economic conditions could cause our revenues to decline, and hamper our ability to repay our indebtedness. If we do not have enough cash to satisfy our debt service obligations, we may be required to refinance all or part of our debt, sell assets or reduce our spending. We may not be able to, at any given time, refinance our debt or sell assets on terms acceptable to us or at all.

If we are unable to comply with the covenants or restrictions contained in our debt instruments, our lenders could declare all amounts outstanding under those instruments to be due and payable, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition.

        Under our credit arrangements with Rio Tinto America we were not subject to covenants or other restrictions on our ability to operate our business. However, we expect our credit arrangements after this offering will contain covenants that, among other things, will restrict our ability to dispose of assets, incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends, create liens on assets, make investments, loans or advances, make acquisitions, engage in mergers or consolidations, and engage in certain transactions with affiliates. We also expect that our credit arrangements may require us to comply with various financial covenants that may be quite restrictive. As a cyclical business it may be difficult to comply with these financial covenants. These restrictions could limit our ability to plan for or react to market conditions or meet extraordinary capital needs or otherwise restrict corporate activities. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources After this Offering" for additional information regarding our credit arrangements.

        The breach of any of the covenants or restrictions unless cured within the applicable grace period, could result in a default under the debt instruments that would permit the lenders to declare all amounts outstanding to be due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest. In such an event, we may not have sufficient assets to repay such indebtedness. As a result, any default could have serious consequences to our financial condition.

Our ability to mine and ship coal is affected by adverse weather conditions, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues.

        Adverse weather conditions can impact our ability to mine and ship our coal and our customers' ability to take delivery of our coal. Lower than expected shipments by us during any period could have an adverse effect on our revenues. For example, in 2005, our volume of coal shipments was impacted by severe heavy rain, which reduced the capacity of the railroads by which our customers contract to transport coal from our mines. In addition, severe weather, including droughts and dust, may affect our ability to conduct our mining operations.

If our highwalls or spoil-piles fail, our mining operations and ability to ship our coal could be impaired and our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

        Our operations could be adversely affected and we may be unable to produce coal if our highwalls fail due to conditions which may include geological abnormalities, poor ground conditions, water or blasting shocks, among others. In addition to making it difficult and more costly to recover coal, a highwall failure could also damage adjacent infrastructure such as roads, power lines, railways and gas pipelines. Further, in-pit spoil failure due to conditions such as material type, water ingress, floor angle, floor roughness, spoil volume or otherwise, can impact coal removal, reduce coal recovery, increase our costs, or interrupt our production and shipments. Highwall and spoil-pile failures could materially and adversely affect our operations thereby reducing our profitability.

25


Table of Contents

Major equipment and plant failures could reduce our ability to produce and ship coal and materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

        We depend on several major pieces of equipment and plant to produce and ship our coal, including draglines, shovels, coal crushing plant, critical conveyors, major transformers and coal silos. If any of these pieces of equipment or plant suffered major damage or were destroyed by fire, abnormal wear, flooding, incorrect operation, damage from highwall or spoil-pile failures, or otherwise, we may be unable to replace or repair them in a timely manner or at a reasonable cost which would impact our ability to produce and ship coal and materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

Significant increases in the royalty and production taxes we pay on the coal we produce could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

        We pay federal, state and private royalties and federal, state and county production taxes on the coal we produce. A substantial portion of our royalties and production taxes are levied as a percentage of gross revenues with the remaining levied on a per ton basis. For example, we pay production royalties of 12.5% of gross revenues to the federal government. In 2007, we incurred royalties and production taxes which represented 29.0% of revenues from the coal we produced (including Colowyo). If the royalty and production tax rates were to significantly increase, our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

        In addition, the Wyoming state severance tax is significantly less than the state severance tax in Montana. Because a substantial portion of our operations are in Wyoming and therefore subject to the more favorable Wyoming severance tax rate, if Wyoming were to increase this tax or any other tax applicable solely to our Wyoming operations, we may be significantly impacted and our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Increases in the cost of raw materials and other industrial supplies, or the inability to obtain a sufficient quantity of those supplies, could increase our operating expenses, disrupt or delay our production and materially and adversely affect profitability.

        We use considerable quantities of explosives, petroleum-based fuels, tires, steel and other raw materials, as well as spare parts and other consumables in the mining process. If the prices of steel, explosives, tires, petroleum products or other materials continue to increase or if the value of the U.S. dollar continues to decline relative to foreign currencies with respect to certain imported supplies or other products, our operating expenses will increase, which could materially and adversely impact our profitability. Additionally, there are a limited number of suppliers for certain supplies, such as explosives and tires as well as certain mining equipment, and any of our suppliers may divert their products to buyers in other mines or industries or divert their raw materials to produce other products that have a higher profit margin. Shortages in raw materials used in the manufacturing of supplies and mining equipment, which, in some cases, do not have ready substitutes, or the cancellation of our supply contracts under which we obtain these raw materials and other consumables, could limit our ability to obtain these supplies or equipment. As a stand-alone company, we may experience more difficulty in acquiring supplies, particularly where there are shortages, than we otherwise would have experienced as part of the Rio Tinto Group. As a consequence, we may not be able to acquire adequate replacements for these supplies or equipment on a cost-effective basis or at all, which could also materially increase our operating expenses or halt, disrupt or delay our production. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Cost of Product Sold."

26


Table of Contents

Significant increases in the price of diesel fuel could materially and adversely affect our earnings.

        Operating expenses at our mining locations are sensitive to changes in diesel fuel prices. Since December 2007, our weighted average price for diesel fuel increased from $2.57 per gallon in December 2007 to $3.62 per gallon in September 2008. Diesel fuel expenses represented 10.4% of our cost of product sold for the year ended December 31, 2007, and 12.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2008. We have not entered into any hedge or other arrangements to reduce the volatility in the price of diesel fuel for our operations, although we may do so in the future. In addition, the supply contract under which we purchase all of our diesel fuel expires at the end of 2008. As a result, if we are unable to enter into a new supply contract on the same or similar terms or if the price of diesel fuel continues to increase, we will incur higher expenses for diesel fuel and, therefore, potentially materially lower earnings. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Cost of Product Sold."

As a stand-alone company, we will need to enter into new supply contracts for the raw materials and other mining consumables used in our mining operations. If we are unable to do so, or to do so on a cost-effective basis, our operating expenses could materially increase and our ability to conduct our business could be materially and adversely affected.

        As part of the Rio Tinto Group, we historically obtained explosives, petroleum-based fuels, tires, steel and other raw materials, as well as spare parts and other mining consumables used in the mining process through various Rio Tinto Group global and regional supply contracts. Upon completion of this offering, we will no longer be a party to these Rio Tinto Group supply contracts. Although some of our supplies and equipment will be obtained under purchase orders or other arrangements entered into prior to termination, we expect to enter into new supply contracts prior to the completion of this offering to replace the Rio Tinto Group supply contracts. We cannot assure you that we will be able to enter into new contracts on the same or similar terms to those contracts that currently exist or at all. The prices for those supplies and equipment may be more expensive because we will not be part of the Rio Tinto Group or have access to their supply arrangements. If we are unable to enter into new supply contracts or if the new supply contracts contain materially different terms relative to the Rio Tinto Group supply contracts, including with respect to costs, our operating expenses could materially increase and our mining operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Substantially all of our coal sales contracts are forward sales contracts. If the production costs underlying these contracts increases, our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

        Substantially all of our coal sales contracts are forward sales contracts under which customers agree to pay a specified price under their contracts for coal to be delivered in future years. The profitability of these contracts depends on our ability to adequately control the costs of the coal production underlying the contracts. These production costs are subject to variability due to a number of factors, including increases in the cost of labor, supplies or other raw materials, such as diesel fuel. As part of the Rio Tinto Group, we did not enter into hedge or other arrangements to offset the cost variability underlying these forward sale contracts. In the future, we may enter into these types of arrangements but we may not be successful in hedging the volatility of our costs. To the extent our costs increase but pricing under these coal sales contracts remains fixed, we will be unable to pass increasing costs on to our customers. If we are unable to control our costs, our profitability under our forward sales contracts may be impaired and our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our ability to operate our business effectively could be impaired if we fail to attract and retain key personnel.

        Our ability to operate our business and implement our strategies depends, in part, on the continued contributions of our executive officers and other key employees. The loss of any of our key

27


Table of Contents


senior executives could have a material adverse effect on our business unless and until we find a replacement. A limited number of persons exist with the requisite experience and skills to serve in our senior management positions. We may not be able to locate or employ qualified executives on acceptable terms. In addition, we believe that our future success will depend on our continued ability to attract and retain highly skilled personnel with coal industry experience. Competition for these persons in the coal industry is intense and we may not be able to successfully recruit, train or retain qualified managerial personnel. As a public company, our future success also will depend on our ability to hire and retain management with public company experience. We may not be able to continue to employ key personnel or attract and retain qualified personnel in the future. Our failure to retain or attract key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our ability to effectively operate our business.

Our management team does not have experience managing our business as a stand-alone public company and if they are unable to manage our business as a stand-alone public company, our business may be harmed.

        We have historically operated as part of the Rio Tinto Group. Following the completion of this offering, we will operate as a stand-alone public company. Our management team does not have experience managing our business on a stand-alone basis or as a public company. If we are unable to manage and operate our company as an independent public entity, our business and results of operations will be adversely affected.

As a stand-alone U.S. public company, we will be required to comply with certain financial reporting and other requirements on a basis that is different than our reporting requirements as a subsidiary of Rio Tinto. If we are unable to comply with these requirements, our business could be materially and adversely affected.

        Prior to this offering, we operated as an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto, which requires us to provide them financial information for inclusion in their consolidated financial reports. We provided this information in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, at a level of materiality commensurate with their consolidated financial statements and necessary to meet their regulatory financial reporting requirements. As a stand-alone public company, we will be required to comply with the record keeping, financial reporting, corporate governance and other rules and regulations of the SEC, including the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Public Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, and other regulatory bodies. These entities generally require that financial information be reported in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or U.S. GAAP, which differs from IFRS. We will also be required to report at a level of materiality commensurate with our stand-alone consolidated financial statements and necessary to meet our regulatory financial reporting requirements, which is lower than that of Rio Tinto.

        As an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto, we were not required and did not have personnel with SEC, Sarbanes-Oxley Act, PCAOB and U.S. GAAP financial reporting expertise. In addition, we were not required to comply with the internal control design, documentation and testing requirements imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on a stand-alone basis, but rather only complied to the extent required as a part of the Rio Tinto Group. In connection with this offering as a publicly-held, stand-alone company, we will become directly subject to these requirements. If we fail to comply with these requirements, our business and stock price could be materially and adversely affected, including, among other things, through the loss of investor confidence, adverse publicity, investigations and sanctions imposed by regulatory authorities.

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting that, if not properly corrected, could result in material misstatements in our financial reporting.

        During the preparation of our carve-out consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, through our own

28


Table of Contents


assessment we determined that we have, and our independent registered public accounting firm informed our management of, material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting as a stand-alone company that, if not properly corrected, could result in material misstatements in our financial reporting. Specifically, we have not been required to have, and as a result did not maintain a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting and financial reporting knowledge, experience and training in the application of U.S. GAAP commensurate with our financial reporting requirements and the complexity of our operations and transactions. We also did not maintain an adequate system of processes and internal controls as a stand-alone public company sufficient to support our financial reporting requirements and produce timely and accurate U.S. GAAP consolidated financial statements consistent with being a stand-alone public company. In addition, during the preparation of our consolidated financial statements as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2008, we identified an error in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Specifically, we had not recorded an accrual at March 31, 2008 for certain charges from an affiliated entity, totaling $2.0 million, thereby understating selling, general and administrative expenses and amounts due to related parties by this amount in our March 31, 2008 consolidated financial statements. These amounts have been appropriately reflected in our consolidated financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2008, appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, and we have revised the financial statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2008 as appropriate, which appear elsewhere in this prospectus.

        A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. A deficiency in internal control over financial reporting exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis.

        We will need to undertake various remedial actions before we can be reasonably assured that our internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures will be effective. If we continue to experience material weaknesses in our internal controls or conclude that we have ineffective disclosure controls and procedures, investors could lose confidence in our financial reporting, particularly if such weaknesses result in a restatement of our financial results, and our stock price could decline. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Internal Controls."

We will be required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls. If we are unable to achieve and maintain effective internal controls, our operating results and financial condition could be harmed.

        We will be required to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act beginning with the year ending December 31, 2009. Section 404 will require that we evaluate our internal control over financial reporting to enable management to report on, and our independent registered public accounting firm to audit, the effectiveness of those controls. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. While we have begun the lengthy process of evaluating our internal controls, we are in the early phases of our review and will not complete our review until well after this offering is completed. We cannot predict the outcome of our review at this time. During the course of the review, we may identify additional control deficiencies of varying degrees of severity, in addition to the material weaknesses discussed above.

29


Table of Contents

        Management has taken steps to improve and continues to improve our internal control over financial reporting, including identification of the gaps in skills base and expertise of staff required in the finance group to operate as a public company. We will incur significant costs to remediate our material weaknesses and deficiencies and improve our internal controls. To comply with these requirements, we may need to upgrade our systems, including information technology, implement additional financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures and hire additional accounting, finance and legal staff. If we are unable to upgrade our systems and procedures in a timely and effective fashion, we may not be able to comply with our financial reporting requirements and other rules that apply to public companies.

        As a public company, we will be required to report control deficiencies that constitute a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Internal Controls." We will also be required to obtain an audit report from our independent registered public accounting firm regarding the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. If we fail to implement the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, if we or our independent registered public accounting firm are unable to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting are effective or if we fail to comply with our financial reporting requirements, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports. In addition, we or members of our management could be the subject of adverse publicity, investigations and sanctions by regulatory authorities, including the SEC and the NYSE, and be subject to shareholder lawsuits. Any of the above consequences could cause our stock price to decline materially and could impose significant unanticipated costs on us.

We will incur higher costs as a result of being a public company, which may be significant. If we fail to accurately predict or effectively manage these costs, our operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

        As a public company, we will incur higher accounting, purchasing, treasury, legal, risk management, corporate governance and other support expenses than we did as a part of the Rio Tinto Group, which may be significant. The SEC and the New York Stock Exchange have imposed substantial requirements on public companies, including requirements for corporate governance practices and for internal controls over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our accounting, legal and other costs and to make some activities more time-consuming. We also will need to hire additional accounting, legal and administrative staff with experience working for public companies. Initially, we may enter into short-term arrangements with third-party service providers for certain services, such as legal, external financial reporting, external communications and investors relations. These arrangements may not be available on favorable terms. In addition, these service providers may not provide these services at levels sufficient to comply with regulatory requirements. We also may not be able to successfully transition away from these third-party service providers. Moreover, the rules that will be applicable to us as a public company after this offering could make it more difficult and expensive for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors and qualified executive officers. We also anticipate that these rules will make it difficult and expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance. While our pro forma consolidated financial statements reflect certain of our estimates of the expected costs as a public company, these estimates may not be accurate and our costs may be greater than reflected in our pro forma consolidated financial statements. If we fail to predict these costs accurately or to manage these costs effectively, our operating results could be adversely affected. See "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information."

30


Table of Contents

Extensive environmental regulations, including existing and potential future regulatory requirements relating to air emissions, affect our customers and could reduce the demand for coal as a fuel source and cause coal prices and sales of our coal to materially decline.

        The operations of our customers are subject to extensive environmental regulation particularly with respect to air emissions. For example, the federal Clean Air Act and similar state and local laws extensively regulate the amount of sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, and other compounds emitted into the air from electric power plants, which are the largest end-users of our coal. A series of more stringent requirements relating to particulate matter, ozone, haze, mercury, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and other air pollutants are expected to be proposed or become effective in coming years. In addition, concerted conservation efforts that result in reduced electricity consumption could cause coal prices and sales of our coal to materially decline.

        Considerable uncertainty is associated with these air emissions initiatives. The content of regulatory requirements in the U.S. is in the process of being developed, and many new regulatory initiatives remain subject to review by federal or state agencies or the courts. Stringent air emissions limitations are either in place or are likely to be imposed in the short to medium term, and these limitations will likely require significant emissions control expenditures for many coal-fired power plants. As a result, these power plants may switch to other fuels that generate fewer of these emissions or may install more effective pollution control equipment that reduces the need for low sulfur coal, possibly reducing future demand for coal and a reduced need to construct new coal-fired power plants. The EIA's expectations for the coal industry assume there will be a significant number of as yet unplanned coal-fired plants built in the future which may not occur. Any switching of fuel sources away from coal, closure of existing coal-fired plants, or reduced construction of new plants could have a material adverse effect on demand for and prices received for our coal. Alternatively, less stringent air emissions limitations, particularly related to sulfur, to the extent enacted could make low sulfur coal less attactive, which could also have a material adverse effect on the demand for and prices received for our coal. See "Environmental and Other Regulatory Matters."

New and potential future regulatory requirements relating to greenhouse gas emissions could affect our customers and could reduce the demand for coal as a fuel source and cause coal prices and sales of our coal to materially decline.

        One major by-product of burning coal is carbon dioxide, which is considered a greenhouse gas and is a major source of concern with respect to global warming. Future regulation of greenhouse gases in the U.S. could occur pursuant to future U.S. treaty commitments, if any, pursuant to the Kyoto Protocol or otherwise, new domestic legislation that, for example, may establish a carbon tax or cap-and-trade program, regulation by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or the EPA, in response to the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Massachusetts v. EPA that the EPA has authority to regulate carbon dioxide emissions under the Clean Air Act, or otherwise. State and regional climate change initiatives, such as the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative of certain northeastern and mid-atlantic states, the Western Climate Initiative, the Midwestern Greenhouse Gas Reduction Accord, and the California Global Warming Solutions Act, either have already taken effect or may take effect before federal action. The permitting of new coal-fired power plants has also recently been contested by state regulators and environmental organizations for concerns related to greenhouse gas emissions from the new plants.

        Climate change initiatives and other efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions may require additional controls on coal-fired power plants and industrial boilers, may even cause some users of coal to switch from coal to a lower carbon fuel and may result in the closure of coal-fired power plants or in reduced construction of new plants. Any switching of fuel sources away from coal, closure of existing coal-fired plants, or reduced construction of new plants could have a material adverse effect on demand for and prices received for our coal. See "Environmental and Other Regulatory Matters."

31


Table of Contents

Because we produce and sell coal with low sulfur content, a reduction in the price of sulfur dioxide emission allowances or increased use of technologies to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions could materially and adversely affect the demand for our coal and our results of operations.

        Our customers' demand for our low sulfur coal, and the prices that we can obtain for it, are affected by, among other things, the price of sulfur dioxide emissions allowances. The Clean Air Act places limits on the amounts of sulfur dioxide that can be emitted by an electric power plant in any given year. If a plant exceeds its allowable limits, it must purchase allowances, which are tradeable in the open market. Low prices of these emissions allowances could make our low sulfur coal less attractive to our customers. In addition, more widespread installation by electric utilities of technology that reduces sulfur emissions, which could be accelerated by increases in the prices of sulfur dioxide emissions allowances, may make high sulfur coal more competitive with our low sulfur coal. This competition could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Extensive environmental regulations impose significant costs on our mining operations, and future regulations could materially increase those costs or limit our ability to produce and sell coal.

        The coal mining industry is subject to increasingly strict regulation by federal, state and local authorities with respect to environmental matters such as:

        The costs, liabilities and requirements associated with the laws and regulations related to these and other environmental matters may be costly and time-consuming and may delay commencement or continuation of exploration or production operations. We cannot assure you that we have been or will be at all times in compliance with the applicable laws and regulations. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of cleanup and site restoration costs and liens, the issuance of injunctions to limit or cease operations, the suspension or revocation of permits and other enforcement measures that could have the effect of limiting production from our operations. We may incur material costs and liabilities resulting from claims for damages to property or injury to persons arising from our operations. If we are pursued for sanctions, costs and liabilities in respect of these matters, our mining operations and, as a result, our profitability could be materially and adversely affected.

32


Table of Contents

        New legislation or administrative regulations or new judicial interpretations or administrative enforcement of existing laws and regulations, including proposals related to the protection of the environment that would further regulate and tax the coal industry, may also require us to change operations significantly or incur increased costs. Such changes could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. See "Environmental and Other Regulatory Matters."

Our operations may affect the environment or cause exposure to hazardous substances, and our properties may have environmental contamination, any of which could result in material liabilities to us.

        Our operations currently use, and in the past have used, hazardous materials and generate, and in the past have generated, hazardous wastes. In addition, many of the locations that we own or operate were used for coal mining and/or involved hazardous materials either before or after we were involved with these locations. We may be subject to claims under federal and state statutes and/or common law doctrines for toxic torts, natural resource damages and other damages, as well as for the investigation and clean up of soil, surface water, groundwater, and other media. These claims may arise, for example, out of current or former conditions at sites that we own or operate currently, as well as at sites that we or predecessor entities owned or operated in the past, and at contaminated third-party sites at which we have disposed of waste. As a matter of law, and despite any contractual indemnity or allocation arrangements or acquisition agreements to the contrary, our liability for these claims may be joint and several, so that we may be held responsible for more than our share of any contamination, or even for the entire share.

        These and similar unforeseen impacts that our operations may have on the environment, as well as human exposure to hazardous substances or wastes associated with our operations, could result in costs and liabilities that could materially and adversely affect us.

Extensive governmental regulations pertaining to employee safety and health impose significant costs on our mining operations, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

        Federal and state safety and health regulations in the coal mining industry are among the most comprehensive and pervasive systems for protection of employee safety and health affecting any segment of U.S. industry. Compliance with these requirements imposes significant costs on us and can result in reduced productivity. Moreover, the possibility exists that new health and safety legislation and/or regulations and orders may be adopted that may materially and adversely affect our mining operations.

        We must compensate employees for work-related injuries. If we do not make adequate provisions for our workers' compensation liabilities, it could harm our future operating results. In addition, the erosion through tort liability of the protections we are currently provided by workers' compensation laws could increase our liability for work-related injuries and materially and adversely affect our operating results. Under federal law, each coal mine operator must secure payment of federal black lung benefits to claimants who are current and former employees and contribute to a trust fund for the payment of benefits and medical expenses to claimants who last worked in the coal industry before January 1, 1970. The trust fund is funded by an excise tax on coal production. If this tax increases, or if we could no longer pass it on to the purchasers of our coal under our coal sales agreements, our operating costs could be increased and our results could be materially and adversely harmed. If new laws or regulations increase the number and award size of claims, it could materially and adversely harm our business. See "Environmental and Other Regulatory Matters."

33


Table of Contents

Federal or state regulatory agencies have the authority to order certain of our mines to be temporarily or permanently closed under certain circumstances, which could materially and adversely affect our ability to meet our customers' demands.

        Federal or state regulatory agencies have the authority under certain circumstances following significant health and safety incidents, such as fatalities, to order a mine to be temporarily or permanently closed. If this occurred, we may be required to incur capital expenditures to re-open the mine. In the event that these agencies order the closing of our mines, our coal sales contracts generally permit us to issue force majeure notices which suspend our obligations to deliver coal under these contracts. However, our customers may challenge our issuances of force majeure notices. If these challenges are successful, we may have to purchase coal from third-party sources, if it is available, to fulfill these obligations, incur capital expenditures to re-open the mines and/or negotiate settlements with the customers, which may include price reductions, the reduction of commitments or the extension of time for delivery or terminate customers' contracts. Any of these actions could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We may be unable to obtain, maintain or renew permits necessary for our operations, which would materially reduce our production, cash flow and profitability.

        Mining companies must obtain a number of permits that impose strict regulations on various environmental and operational matters in connection with coal mining. These include permits issued by various federal, state and local agencies and regulatory bodies. The permitting rules, and the interpretations of these rules, are complex, change frequently, and are often subject to discretionary interpretations by the regulators, all of which may make compliance more difficult or impractical, and may possibly preclude the continuance of ongoing operations or the development of future mining operations. The public, including non-governmental organizations, anti-mining groups and individuals, have certain statutory rights to comment upon and submit objections to requested permits and environmental impact statements prepared in connection with applicable regulatory processes, and otherwise engage in the permitting process, including bringing citizens' lawsuits to challenge the issuance of permits, the validity of environmental impact statements or performance of mining activities. Accordingly, required permits may not be issued or renewed in a timely fashion or at all, or permits issued or renewed may be conditioned in a manner that may restrict our ability to efficiently and economically conduct our mining activities, any of which would materially reduce our production, cash flow, and profitability.

The availability and reliability of transportation and increases in transportation costs, particularly for rail systems, could materially and adversely affect the demand for our coal or impair our ability to supply coal to our customers.

        Transportation costs, particularly rail transportation costs, represent a significant portion of the total cost of coal for our customers, and the cost of transportation is a key factor in a customer's purchasing decision. Increases in transportation costs or the lack of sufficient rail capacity or availability could make coal a less competitive source of energy or could make the coal produced by us less competitive than coal produced from other regions, either of which could lead to reduced coal sales and/or reduced prices we receive for the coal.

        Our ability to sell coal to our customers depends primarily upon third-party rail systems. If our customers are unable to obtain rail or other transportation services, or to do so on a cost-effective basis, our business and growth strategy could be adversely affected. Alternative transportation and delivery systems are generally inadequate and not suitable to handle the quantity of our shipments or to ensure timely delivery to our customers. In particular, much of the PRB is served by two rail carriers and two of our mines in the Northern PRB are only serviced by one rail carrier. The loss of access to rail capacity in the PRB could create temporary disruption until this access was restored, significantly

34


Table of Contents


impairing our ability to supply coal and resulting in materially decreased revenues. Our ability to open new mines or expand existing mines may also be affected by the availability and cost of rail or other transportation systems available for servicing these mines.

        While we are a party to some transportation contracts, our coal customers typically contract for, and pay directly for transportation of coal from the mine or port to the point of use. Disruption of these transportation services because of weather-related problems, mechanical difficulties, train derailment, bridge or structural concerns, infrastructure damage, whether caused by ground instability, accidents or otherwise, strikes, lock-outs, lack of fuel or maintenance items, fuel costs, transportation delays, accidents, terrorism or domestic catastrophe or other events could temporarily or over the long term impair our ability to supply coal to our customers and our customers' ability to take our coal and, therefore, could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

A shortage of skilled labor in the mining industry could reduce labor productivity and increase costs, which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

        Efficient coal mining using modern techniques and equipment requires skilled laborers in multiple disciplines such as electricians, equipment operators, mechanics, engineers and welders, among others. Current shortages for these types of skilled labor exist. If the shortage of skilled labor continues or worsens, our labor and overall productivity or costs could be materially and adversely affected.

        As a result of current favorable market conditions and the high demand for skilled labor in the region in which we operate, we are experiencing a record level of labor costs. Our labor costs were approximately 19.0% of our cost of product sold for the year ended December 31, 2007. We also utilize external contractors for portions of our operations, and the costs of these contractors has increased as well. As of October 1, 2008, we had 477 external contractors on a full time equivalent basis. This number fluctuates from time to time. If coal prices decrease in the future and labor and contractor prices are not reduced commensurately, or if we experience materially increased health and benefit costs with respect to our employees, our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Due to the long-term nature of our coal sales agreements, the prices we receive for our coal at any given time may be lower than then-existing current market prices for coal.

        We sell most of our coal under long-term coal sales agreements, which we generally define as contracts with a term of one to five years. The remaining amount not subject to long-term coal sales agreements is sold as spot sales in term allotments of less than 12 months. For the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, approximately 92.3% and 97.3%, respectively, of our revenues was derived from coal sales that were made under long-term coal sales agreements. The prices for coal shipped under these agreements are typically fixed for an agreed amount of time. Pricing in some of these contracts is subject to certain adjustments in later years or under certain circumstances, and may be below the current market price for similar type coal at any given time, depending on the timeframe of the contract. As a consequence of the substantial volume of our forward sales, we have less coal available to sell under short-term contracts with which to immediately capitalize on higher coal prices, if and when they arise. In addition, in some cases, our ability to realize the higher prices that may be available in the spot market may be restricted when customers elect to purchase additional volumes allowable under some contracts at contract prices that are lower than current spot prices.

35


Table of Contents

Changes in purchasing patterns in the coal industry may make it difficult for us to enter into new contracts with customers, or do so on favorable terms, which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

        Although we currently sell the majority of our coal under long-term coal sales contracts, as electric utilities customers continue to adjust to increased price volatility, increased fungibility of coal products, frequently changing regulations and the increasing deregulation of their industry, they are becoming less willing to enter into long-term coal sales contracts. When our current contracts with customers expire or are otherwise renegotiated, our customers may decide not to extend or enter into new long-term coal sales contracts or our customers may decide to purchase fewer tons of coal than in the past or on different terms, including under different pricing terms. We have one significant broker sales contract which in 2007 contributed $116.6 million of revenue and income before tax of $38.3 million after an amortization charge for the related contract rights of $34.2 million. Final deliveries are expected to be made under this contract in the first quarter of 2010 at which time we expect the contract to expire. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Revenues."

        These trends in purchasing patterns in the coal industry could continue in the future and, to the extent our customers shift away from long-term supply contracts, it will be more difficult to predict our future sales, and we cannot be certain that we will have a market for our future production at acceptable prices. The prices we receive in the spot market may be less than the contractual price an electric utility is willing to pay for a committed supply. Furthermore, spot market prices tend to be more volatile than contractual prices, which could result in decreased revenues.

Failure to obtain, maintain or renew our security arrangements, such as surety bonds or letters of credit, in a timely manner and on acceptable terms could affect our ability to secure reclamation and coal lease obligations, and materially and adversely affect our ability to mine or lease coal.

        Federal and state laws require us to secure the performance of certain long-term obligations, such as mine closure or reclamation costs and federal and state workers' compensation costs, including black lung. A significant portion of our obligations are secured by surety bonds and at December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, there were $395.4 million and $416.4 million, respectively, of surety bonds in place (including our obligations with respect to the Decker mine and $96.7 million at both December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, with respect to Colowyo and other non-coal businesses). Certain business transactions, such as coal leases and other obligations, may also require bonding. We may have difficulty procuring or maintaining our surety bonds. Our bond issuers may demand higher fees, additional collateral, including putting up letters of credit, or other terms less favorable to us upon those renewals. While we were a part of the Rio Tinto Group, Rio Tinto typically served as guarantor of our surety bonds. Surety bond issuers may demand terms that are less favorable to us and there may be fewer companies willing to issue these bonds. Because we are required by state and federal law to have these bonds in place before mining can commence, or continue, our failure to maintain surety bonds, letters of credit or other guarantees or security arrangements would materially and adversely affect our ability to mine or lease coal. That failure could result from a variety of factors including lack of availability, our lack of affiliation with the Rio Tinto Group, higher expense or unfavorable market terms, the exercise by third-party surety bond issuers of their right to refuse to renew the surety and restrictions on availability of collateral for current and future third-party surety bond issuers under the terms of any credit facility then in place. In addition, because we will not be an investment grade company upon the completion of this offering, surety bond issuers will likely require significantly more collateral than prior to the offering while we were a part of the Rio Tinto Group.

        We have also historically used letters of credit issued under Rio Tinto's pre-existing credit facilities to secure our obligations or, occasionally, serve as collateral for reclamation surety bonds. At December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, there were $328.1 million and $328.2 million, respectively, of letters of credit in place under Rio Tinto's credit facilities and other arrangements between RTEA and

36


Table of Contents


various counterparties (including our obligations with respect to the Decker mine and $8.6 million at both December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, with respect to Colowyo and other non-coal businesses). These letters of credit are typically renewable annually at various times throughout a given year. We expect that any future credit facility will provide for a revolving credit facility of $             million, of which up to $             million may be used for letters of credit. If we do not maintain sufficient borrowing capacity under our expected credit facility for additional letters of credit, we may be unable to obtain or renew surety bonds required for our mining operations.

If the assumptions underlying our reclamation and mine closure obligations are materially inaccurate, our costs could be greater than anticipated.

        All of our mines are surface mining operations. The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, or SMCRA, and counterpart state laws and regulations establish operational, reclamation and closure standards for all aspects of surface mining. We estimate our total reclamation and mine-closing liabilities based on permit requirements, engineering studies and our engineering expertise related to these requirements. The estimate of ultimate reclamation liability is reviewed periodically by our management and engineers. The estimated liability can change significantly if actual costs vary from our original assumptions or if governmental regulations change significantly. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, requires that asset retirement obligations be recorded as a liability based on fair value, which is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows. In estimating future cash flows, we consider the estimated current cost of reclamation and apply inflation rates and a third-party profit, as necessary. The third-party profit is an estimate of the approximate markup that would be charged by contractors for work performed on behalf of us. The resulting estimated reclamation and mine closure obligations could change significantly if actual amounts change significantly from our assumptions, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operation and financial condition. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources After this Offering"—Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements" for a description of our estimated costs of these liabilities.

If the third-party sources we use to supply coal are unable to fulfill the delivery terms of their contracts, our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

        To fulfill deliveries under our coal sales agreements, we may from time to time purchase coal through third-party sources. For the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, we purchased 6.3 million tons and 3.0 million tons, respectively, from third-party sources for delivery during those periods. We also from time to time use third-party sources to sell our coal. Our profitability and exposure to loss on these transactions or relationships is dependent upon the reliability, including the financial viability, of the third-party coal producer, and on the price of the coal supplied by the third-party or sold by us. Operational difficulties, changes in demand and other factors beyond our control could affect the availability, pricing and quality of coal purchased by us. Disruptions in the quantities or qualities of coal purchased by us could affect our ability to fill our customer orders or require us to purchase coal, including at higher prices, from other sources in order to satisfy those orders. If we are unable to fill a customer order or if we are required to purchase coal from other sources in order to satisfy a customer order, we could lose existing customers, and our results of operations could be adversely affected.

Certain provisions in our coal sales contracts may provide limited protection during adverse economic conditions or may result in economic penalties upon a failure to meet specifications, any of which may cause our revenues and profits to suffer.

        Most of our sales contracts contain provisions that allow for the base price of our coal in these contracts to be adjusted due to new statutes, ordinances or regulations that affect our costs related to performance. Because these provisions only apply to the base price of coal these terms may provide

37


Table of Contents


only limited protection due to changes in regulations. A few of our sales contracts also contain provisions that allow for the purchase price to be renegotiated at periodic intervals. Index-based pricing, "price re-opener" and other similar provisions in sales contracts may reduce the protection available under long-term contracts from short-term coal price volatility. Price re-opener and index provisions, which can permit renegotiation by either party, including at pre-determined times, or based on a fixed formula, are present in contracts covering approximately 25% of our tonnage commitments in 2008 and beyond. Price re-opener provisions may automatically set a new price based on the prevailing market price or, in some instances, require the parties to negotiate a new price, sometimes between a specified range of prices. In some circumstances, a significant adjustment in base price or the failure of the parties to agree on a price under a price re-opener provision can lead to termination of the contract. Any adjustment or renegotiations leading to a significantly lower contract price could result in decreased revenues.

        Quality and volumes for the coal are stipulated in coal sales agreements. In most cases, the annual pricing and volume obligations are fixed although in some cases the volume specified may vary depending on the quality of the coal. In a relatively small number of contracts customers are allowed to vary the amount of coal taken under the contract. Most of our coal sales agreements contain provisions requiring us to deliver coal within certain ranges for specific coal characteristics such as heat content, sulfur, ash and ash fusion temperature. Failure to meet these specifications can result in economic penalties, including price adjustments, suspension, rejection or cancellation of deliveries or termination of the contracts. Many of our contracts contain clauses which in some cases may allow customers to terminate the contract in the event of certain changes in environmental laws and regulations.

Upon the occurrence of a force majeure, we or our customers may be permitted to temporarily suspend performance under our coal sales contracts which could cause our revenues and profits to suffer.

        Our coal sales agreements typically contain force majeure provisions allowing temporary suspension of performance by us, or our customers during the duration of specified events beyond the control of the affected party, including events such as strikes, adverse mining conditions, mine closures, serious transportation problems that affect us or the buyer or unanticipated plant outages that may affect the buyer. Some contracts stipulate that this tonnage can be made up by mutual agreement or at the discretion of the buyer. Agreements between our customers and the railroads servicing our mines may also contain force majeure provisions. Generally, our coal sales agreements allow our customer to suspend performance in the event that the railroad fails to provide its services due to circumstances that would constitute a force majeure. In the event that we are required to suspend performance under any of our coal sales contracts, or we are required to purchase additional tonnage during the period in which performance under the contract is suspended, our revenues and profits could be materially and adversely affected.

Acquisitions that we may undertake in the future involve a number of risks, any of which could cause us not to realize the anticipated benefits.

        We have focused on strategic acquisitions and subsequent expansions of large, low cost, low sulfur operations in the PRB and replacement of, and additions to, our reserves through the acquisition of companies, mines and reserves. We intend to pursue acquisition opportunities in the future. If we are unable to successfully integrate the businesses or properties we acquire, or reserves that we lease or otherwise acquire, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be negatively affected. Acquisition transactions involve various risks, including:

38


Table of Contents

        Any one or more of these factors could cause us not to realize the benefits we might anticipate from an acquisition. Moreover, any acquisition opportunities we pursue could materially increase our liquidity and capital resource needs and may require us to incur indebtedness, seek equity capital or both. In addition, future acquisitions could result in our assuming significant long-term liabilities relative to the value of the acquisitions.

We do not currently operate the Decker mine, in which we hold a 50% interest, and our results of operation could be adversely affected if the third-party mine operator fails to effectively operate the mine. In addition, our future credit arrangements may limit our ability to contribute cash to the Decker mine.

        Through our indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary, we hold a 50% interest in the Decker mine in Montana through a joint venture agreement with an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Level 3. The Decker mine is managed by a third-party mine operator. While we participate in the management committee of the Decker mine under the terms of the joint venture agreement, we do not control the daily management of the Decker mine and our employees do not participate in the day-to-day operations of the mine. If the third-party mine operator fails to manage the Decker mine effectively, our results of operation could be adversely affected.

        While capital contributions to the Decker joint venture have historically been made at the discretion of the management committee, under the terms of the joint venture agreement we may be required to contribute our proportional share of funds to carry on the business of the joint venture or to cover liabilities. In the event that either joint venture partner does not contribute its share of operating expenses or other liabilities, the other partner is not required to assume their obligation, but may have joint and several liability as a matter of law. In addition, if we do not provide our proportional share or our joint venture partner does provide its proportional share, our interest in the Decker mine will be adjusted proportionally. Our future credit arrangements may include provisions limiting our ability to make contributions to the Decker joint venture.

Our work force could become unionized in the future, which could adversely affect the stability of our production and materially reduce our profitability.

        All of our mines, other than the Decker mine, which we do not operate, are operated by non-union employees. Our employees have the right at any time under the National Labor Relations Act to form or affiliate with a union, and in the past unions have conducted limited organizing activities in this regard. If our employees choose to form or affiliate with a union and the terms of a union collective bargaining agreement are significantly different from our current compensation and job assignment arrangements with our employees, these arrangements could adversely affect the stability of our production and materially reduce our profitability. In addition, even if we remain a non-union operation, our business may still be adversely affected by work stoppages at unionized companies or unionized transportation and service providers.

39


Table of Contents

        We hold a 50% interest in the Decker mine, which is a union-based operation. These union-represented employees could strike, which could adversely affect production at the Decker mine, increase Decker's costs and disrupt shipments of coal from the Decker mine to its customers, all of which could materially and adversely affect Decker's profitability and the value of our investment in Decker.

Provisions in our federal and state lease agreements, or defects in title or the loss of a leasehold interest in certain property or reserves or related surface rights, could limit our ability to mine our coal reserves.

        We conduct a significant part of our coal mining operations on federal coal that is leased through the LBA process. We also conduct a portion of our operations on coal that is leased from the states of Montana or Wyoming, as applicable. Under these federal and state leases, if the leased coal reserves are not diligently developed during the initial 10 years of the leases or if certain other terms of the leases are not complied with, including the requirement to produce a minimum quantity of coal or pay a minimum production royalty, if applicable, the BLM or the applicable state regulatory agency can terminate the lease prior to the expiration of its term. If any of our leases are terminated, we would be unable to mine the affected coal and our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

        We also lease from private third parties or own outright a smaller portion of our reserves. A title defect or the loss of any of these private leases or the surface rights related to any of our reserves, including reserves acquired through the LBA process, could adversely affect our ability to mine the associated coal reserves. Consistent with industry practice, we conduct only limited investigations of title to our coal properties prior to leasing. Title to properties leased from private third parties is not usually fully verified until we make a commitment to develop a property, which may not occur until we have obtained the necessary permits and completed exploration of the property. In addition, these leasehold interests may be subject to superior property rights of other third parties. Title or other defects in surface rights held by us or other third parties could impair our ability to mine the associated coal reserves or cause us to incur unanticipated costs.

Terrorist attacks and threats, escalation of military activity in response to these attacks or acts of war may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

        Terrorist attacks and threats, escalation of military activity or acts of war may have significant effects on general economic conditions, fluctuations in consumer confidence and spending and market liquidity, each of which could materially and adversely affect our business. Future terrorist attacks, rumors or threats of war, actual conflicts involving the U.S. or its allies, or military or trade disruptions affecting our customers may significantly affect our operations and those of our customers. Strategic targets such as energy-related assets and transportation assets may be at greater risk of future terrorist attacks than other targets in the U.S. Disruption or significant increases in energy prices could result in government-imposed price controls. It is possible that any of these occurrences, or a combination of them, could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations, including from delays or losses in transportation, decreased sales of our coal or extended collections from customers that are unable to timely pay us in accordance with the terms of their supply agreement.

Risks Related to Our Separation from Rio Tinto America and Our Relationship with Rio Tinto

We will rely on an affiliate of Rio Tinto America to provide us with certain key services for our business pursuant to the terms of a transition services agreement for a limited transition period. If this Rio Tinto America affiliate fails to perform its obligations under the agreement or if we do not find equivalent replacement services, we may be unable to provide these services or implement substitute arrangements on a timely and cost-effective basis on terms favorable to us.

        As part of the Rio Tinto Group certain key services are currently provided by various members of the Rio Tinto Group, including services related to treasury, accounting, procurement, legal services,

40


Table of Contents


information technology, employee benefit and welfare plans. Prior to the completion of this offering, we will enter into a Transition Services Agreement, whereby an affiliate of Rio Tinto America will provide us with certain of these key services for a transition period of approximately nine months, although in some cases, such services will be provided on a more limited basis than we have received previously. We believe it is necessary for the Rio Tinto America affiliate to provide these services for us to facilitate the efficient operation of our business as we transition to becoming a public company. See "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements." Once the nine-month transition period specified in the Transition Services Agreement has expired, or if the Rio Tinto America affiliate fails to perform its obligations under the Transition Services Agreement, we will be required to provide these services ourselves or to obtain substitute arrangements with third parties. After the transition period, we may be unable to provide these services internally because of financial or other constraints or be unable to implement substitute arrangements on a timely and cost-effective basis on terms that are favorable to us, or at all.

Our results as a separate, stand-alone company could be significantly different from those portrayed in our historical financial results.

        The historical financial information included in this prospectus has been derived from the consolidated financial statements of Rio Tinto and does not necessarily reflect what our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, costs or expenses would have been had we been a separate, stand-alone company during the periods presented. Rio Tinto did not account for us, and we were not operated, as a separate, stand-alone company for the historical periods presented. In addition, the historical consolidated financial information includes financial information for certain other operations, including with respect to the Colowyo mine. Due to the terms, conditions and other restrictions contained in the existing financing arrangements with respect to the Colowyo mine, the Colowyo mine will not be transferred to Cloud Peak Energy in connection with this offering and the concurrent offering. The historical costs and expenses reflected in our consolidated financial statements also include allocations of general and administrative costs and Rio Tinto headquarters overhead costs from Rio Tinto and its subsidiaries. These expenses are estimates and were based on what we and Rio Tinto considered to be reasonable allocations of the historical costs incurred by Rio Tinto to provide these services required in support of our business.

        Accordingly, our historical consolidated financial information may not be reflective of our financial position, results of operations or cash flows or costs had we been a separate, stand-alone company during the periods presented, and the historical financial information may not be a reliable indicator of what our financial position, results of operations or cash flows will be in the future.

The pro forma consolidated financial information in this prospectus is based on estimates and assumptions that may prove to be materially different from our actual experience as a separate, stand-alone public company.

        In preparing the pro forma consolidated financial information included elsewhere in this prospectus, we have made certain adjustments to the historical consolidated financial information based upon currently available information and upon estimates and assumptions that our management believes are reasonable in order to reflect, on a pro forma basis, the impact of the transactions related to our separation from Rio Tinto America. However, these estimates are predicated on assumptions, judgments and other information which are inherently uncertain.

        These estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the pro forma consolidated financial information in this prospectus may be materially different from our actual experience as a separate, independent company. The pro forma consolidated financial information included elsewhere in this prospectus does not purport to represent what our results of operations would actually have been had we operated as a separate, independent company during the periods presented, nor do the pro forma data give effect to any events other than those discussed in the unaudited pro forma consolidated

41


Table of Contents


financial information and related notes. See "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information."

We will be required to pay Rio Tinto America for most of the benefits we may claim as a result of the tax basis step-up we receive in connection with this offering and related transactions.

        We intend to enter into a Tax Receivable Agreement with Rio Tinto America or its affiliate that will provide for the payment by us to Rio Tinto America or its affiliate of 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state, local and foreign income tax or franchise tax that we will actually realize as a result of the increases in tax basis that we expect to obtain in connection with this offering and related transactions, and of certain other tax benefits related to entering into the Tax Receivable Agreement. Due to the size of the increases in our subsidiaries' tax bases in their tangible and intangible assets, as well as the increase in our basis in the equity of our subsidiaries, we expect to make substantial payments to Rio Tinto America or its affiliate under the Tax Receivable Agreement. Assuming no material changes in the relevant tax law and that we earn sufficient taxable income to realize the full tax benefit of the increased depreciation, amortization and cost depletion deductions, we expect that future payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement in respect of the purchase will range from approximately $             million to $             million in the aggregate over the term of the agreement (assuming an initial public offering price of         , the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), and will be payable over the next            years. The payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement will not be conditioned upon Rio Tinto America's or its affiliate's continued ownership of our stock. Our obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement may affect our available cash, and we may need to incur debt to finance payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement to the extent that our cash resources are insufficient to meet our obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement as a result of timing discrepancies or otherwise.

        Our ability to achieve benefits from any tax basis increase, and the payments expected to be made under the Tax Receivable Agreement, will depend upon a number of factors, as discussed above, including the timing and amount of our future income. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service may challenge all or part of that tax basis increase, and a court could sustain such a challenge.

Rio Tinto America or its affiliates may have interests that differ from your interests as shareholders, and they may be able to influence our business and affairs.

        Upon the completion of this offering, our largest shareholder, Rio Tinto America, will own, in the aggregate, approximately             % of our outstanding common stock, or approximately            % if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full. As a result, Rio Tinto America would be our largest shareholder and, while it continues to own a large amount of our stock, it will be able to influence any matters requiring approval by our shareholders, including the election of directors and the approval of mergers or other significant corporate transactions. Rio Tinto America or its affiliates may have interests that differ from your interests, and they may vote in a way with which you disagree and that may be materially adverse to your interests. The concentration of ownership of our common stock may have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change of control of our company, could deprive our shareholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common stock as part of a sale of our company and may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Rio Tinto may benefit from corporate opportunities that might otherwise be available to us.

        Rio Tinto will continue to hold certain coal assets in the U.S. and abroad following the completion of this offering. The Colowyo mine in Colorado will not be transferred to Cloud Peak Energy but has been included in our historical business and may compete with our continuing business. Rio Tinto may expand, through development of its remaining coal business, acquisitions or otherwise, its operations that directly or indirectly compete with us. For one year following the completion of this offering, Rio Tinto America and its affiliates will not pursue any competitive activity or acquisition in the coal industry within the PRB. Rio Tinto America and its affiliates will not be prohibited from pursuing any

42


Table of Contents


competitive activity or acquisition outside of the PRB, whether during or after this one-year period. Following the completion of this offering, if a corporate opportunity is offered to Rio Tinto America or its affiliates or one or more of Rio Tinto America's or its affiliates' executive officers or directors that relates to any competitive activity or acquisition in the coal industry:

no such person shall be liable to us or any of our shareholders (or any affiliate thereof) for breach of any fiduciary or other duty by reason of the fact that the person, including Rio Tinto America and its affiliates, pursues or acquires the business opportunity, directs the business opportunity to another person or fails to present the business opportunity, or information regarding the business opportunity, to us, unless, in the case of any person who is a director or executive officer of us, the business opportunity is expressly offered to the director or executive officer in his or her capacity as an executive officer or director of our company.

        In addition, Rio Tinto may have other business interests and may engage in any other businesses not specifically prohibited which could compete with us, and these potential conflicts of interest could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects if attractive corporate opportunities are allocated by Rio Tinto to itself or other members of the Rio Tinto Group. See "Description of Capital Stock."

Our directors and executive officers have potential conflicts of interest with us and your interests as shareholders.

        We expect that, following this offering, one of our directors will also be an executive officer of Rio Tinto or its affiliates. This director owes fiduciary duties to our shareholders, which may conflict with the director's role as an executive officer of Rio Tinto or its affiliates. As a result, in connection with any transaction or other relationship involving both companies, this director may, but is not required to, recuse himself and would therefore not participate in any board action relating to these transactions or relationships.

        Our chief executive officer and some of our directors own shares of Rio Tinto or options to purchase Rio Tinto common stock, which may be of greater value than their ownership of our common stock. Ownership of Rio Tinto shares by our directors and executive officers could create, or appear to create, potential conflicts of interest when directors and executive officers are faced with decisions that could have different implications for Rio Tinto or its affiliates than they do us.

Our agreements with Rio Tinto America and its affiliates related to this offering and our separation from Rio Tinto America may be less favorable to us than similar agreements between unaffiliated third parties.

        We will enter into various agreements with Rio Tinto America and its affiliates in connection with the separation while we are a part of the Rio Tinto Group. These agreements may be less favorable to us than similar agreements negotiated between unaffiliated third parties. Pursuant to our agreements with Rio Tinto America and its affiliates, we have agreed to indemnify Rio Tinto America and its affiliates for liabilities related to our business and certain liabilities related to this offering. See "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements" for a description of these indemnification obligations, as well as the other terms and obligations of our agreements with Rio Tinto America and its affiliates. The allocation of assets and liabilities between Rio Tinto America and us may not reflect the allocation that would have been reached by two unaffiliated parties.

Third parties may seek to hold us responsible for liabilities of Rio Tinto America that we did not assume in our separation.

        Third parties may seek to hold us responsible for liabilities of Rio Tinto America related to the Colowyo mine and the uranium business, which will not be transferred to Cloud Peak Energy in

43


Table of Contents


connection with this offering. Under the Master Separation Agreement, Rio Tinto America will agree to indemnify us for claims and losses relating to these liabilities. If those liabilities are significant and we are ultimately held liable for them, we cannot assure you that we will be able to recover the full amount of our losses from Rio Tinto America.

Risks Related to This Offering and Ownership of Our Common Stock

Our stock price could be volatile and could decline for a variety of reasons following this offering, resulting in a substantial loss on your investment.

        Currently, there is no public trading market for our common stock. We cannot predict the extent to which investor interest will lead to an active trading market for our common stock or the prices at which our common stock will trade following this offering. If an active trading market does not develop, you may have difficulty selling any common stock that you buy and the value of your shares may be impaired.

        The initial public offering price for our shares of common stock will be determined by negotiations between the representatives of the underwriters and us and the selling shareholder. This price may not reflect the market price of our common stock following this offering. You may be unable to resell the common stock you purchase at or above the initial public offering price.

        The stock markets generally have experienced extreme volatility, often unrelated to the operating performance of the individual companies whose securities are traded publicly. Broad market fluctuations and general economic conditions may materially adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

        Significant price fluctuations in our common stock could result from a variety of other factors, including, among other things, actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results or financial condition, new laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations applicable to our business, sales of our common stock by our shareholders and any other factors described in this "Risk Factors" section of this prospectus.

If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our company and our industry, or if they issue unfavorable commentary about us or our industry or downgrade our common stock, the price of our common stock could decline.

        The trading market for our common stock will depend in part on the research and reports that securities analysts publish about our company and our industry. We do not control these analysts. One or more analysts could downgrade our stock or issue other negative commentary about our company or our industry. In addition, we may be unable or slow to attract research coverage, and the analysts who publish information about our common stock will have had relatively little recent experience with our company, which could affect their ability to accurately forecast our results or make it more likely that we fail to meet their estimates. Alternatively, if one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company, we could lose visibility in the market. As a result of one or more of these factors, the trading price for our stock could decline.

Future sales of our common stock or other securities convertible into our common stock could cause our stock price to decline.

        Upon completion of this offering, we will have                        shares of unregistered common stock outstanding. Sales of substantial amounts of our unregistered common stock in the public market, including by Rio Tinto America, or the perception that these sales may occur, could cause the market price of our common stock to decrease significantly. Rio Tinto America intends to sell its remaining shares of our common stock as soon as practicable depending on market conditions and any applicable contractual or legal restrictions. In addition, we have issued                        shares of our Series A Preferred Stock to Rio Tinto America, which it will sell in a concurrent offering. Unless previously converted, each share of our Series A Preferred Stock will automatically convert on approximately the

44


Table of Contents


third anniversary of the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock, into between a minimum of                        shares and a maximum of                                    shares of our common stock, depending on the average of the closing prices of our common stock over the 20 consecutive trading day period ending on, and including, the third trading day immediately preceding approximately the third anniversary of the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock. The minimum and maximum conversion rates will be subject to anti-dilution adjustments in certain circumstances. At any time prior to approximately the third anniversary of the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock, holders may elect to convert their shares of Series A Preferred Stock at the minimum conversion rate of                                    shares of common stock for each share of Series A Preferred Stock. Prior to approximately the third anniversary of the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock, we may, upon the occurrence of certain circumstances described under "Description of Capital Stock—Preferred Stock—Series A Preferred Stock," elect to cause the conversion of all, but not less than all, of the Series A Preferred Stock then outstanding into shares of our common stock. Upon a conversion at our option, in addition to the shares of common stock due upon conversion, holders will be entitled to a provisional conversion dividend make-whole amount, which may be paid by increasing the number of shares of common stock to be issued on conversion. If holders elect to convert any shares of Series A Preferred Stock during a specified period beginning on the effective date of a cash acquisition of us, the conversion rate will be adjusted under certain circumstances and holders will also be entitled to a cash acquisition dividend make-whole amount, which may be paid by increasing the number of shares of common stock to be issued on conversion. Dividends on our Series A Preferred Stock are payable quarterly in arrears in cash, shares of our common stock or a combination thereof at our election when declared by our board of directors. Under certain circumstances, we may not be allowed to pay dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock in cash, including pursuant to debt financing arrangements we may have in place or because we do not have legally available funds. If this were to occur and such dividend was not otherwise declared prior to approximately the third anniversary of the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock, any such accumulated and unpaid dividend would be payable in shares of our common stock on approximately the third anniversary of the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock. The conversion of a substantial amount of our Series A Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock or the issuance of substantial amounts of common stock to pay dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock could cause the market price of our common stock to decrease significantly. In addition, the price of our common stock could also be affected by possible sales of our common stock by investors who view the Series A Preferred Stock as a more attractive means of equity participation in our company and by hedging or arbitrage trading activity that may develop involving our common stock. In connection with this offering, Rio Tinto America has entered into a lock-up agreement that prevents the sale of its shares of our common stock for up to 180 days after the date of this prospectus, subject to carve-outs and an extension in certain circumstances as set forth in "Underwriting."

        Following the expiration of the lock-up, Rio Tinto America will have the right, subject to certain conditions, to require us to register the sale of any shares held by them under the federal securities laws. See "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements—Separation-Related Agreements—Registration Rights Agreement." Any such filing or the perception that such a filing may occur, could cause the prevailing market price of our common stock to decline and may impact our ability to sell equity to finance our operations or make strategic acquisitions.

        We intend to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission covering securities which may be issued under our stock incentive plans. A decline in the trading price of our common stock due to the occurrence of any future sales might impede our ability to raise capital through the issuance of additional shares of our common stock or other equity securities and may cause you to lose part or all of your investment in our shares of common stock.

45


Table of Contents

The rights of our common shareholders are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock, including voting and preference rights.

        The holders of our Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to vote on all matters submitted to a vote of the holders of our common stock, as a single class with holders of common stock, on an as converted basis, as though such shares of Series A Preferred Stock had been converted into common stock at the minimum conversion rate of shares of common stock for each share of Series A Preferred Stock. The interests of the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock may differ from those of our holders of our common stock, and accordingly these voting rights may lead to adverse consequences for holders of our common stock. The Series A Preferred Stock also has separate class voting rights that require the consent or approval of holders of 662/3% of the Series A Preferred Stock as to any amendment of our restated certificate of incorporation that authorizes any class or series of stock ranking senior to the Series A Preferred Stock or that materially and adversely affects the rights, preferences, privileges and voting powers of the Series A Preferred Stock. In addition, the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock have the right to appoint two persons to our board of directors if dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock are in arrears for six or more quarterly periods (whether or not consecutive); provided that at any time the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock have such right, such holders shall not be entitled to vote for directors with holders of our common stock. This voting right and the terms of the two directors so elected will continue until such time as the dividend arrearage on the Series A Preferred Stock has been paid in full. As a result of these separate class voting rights, it is possible for the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock to exercise a disproportionate control in voting rights.

        The Series A Preferred Stock will rank senior to all of our common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon our liquidation, winding-up or dissolution. As a result, holders of our Series A Preferred Stock have the right to receive dividends before holders of our common stock receive their dividend and, in the event of our liquidation, winding-up or dissolution, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock would be entitled to receive distributions in preference to the holders of our common stock.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents could discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company and may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

        Certain provisions that will be included in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a change in our management or a change in control over us that shareholders may consider favorable. Among other things, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws will:

        See "Description of Capital Stock—Anti-Takeover Effects of Certain Provisions of Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and Delaware Law."

46


Table of Contents


SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as "anticipate," "believe," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "plan," "potential," "should," "will," "would" or similar words. You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they discuss our plans, strategies, prospects and expectations concerning our business, operating results, financial condition and other similar matters. We believe that it is important to communicate our future expectations to our investors. Our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, information in this prospectus regarding our reserves, the LBA acquisition process, our business and growth strategy, expectations for pricing conditions and demand in the U.S. and foreign coal industries and in the PRB, our ability to operate our business as a stand-alone company and market data related to the domestic and foreign coal industry. In particular, there are forward-looking statements under "The Coal Industry," "Business—Business Strategy" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." There may be events in the future, however, that we are not able to predict accurately or control. The factors listed under "Risk Factors," as well as any cautionary language in this prospectus, provide examples of risks, uncertainties and events that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements. Before you invest in our common stock, you should be aware that the occurrence of the events described in these risk factors and elsewhere in this prospectus could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operation and financial position. Any forward-looking statement made by us in this prospectus speaks only as of the date on which we make it. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

        The following factors are among those that may cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements:

47


Table of Contents

48


Table of Contents


USE OF PROCEEDS

        We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares by Rio Tinto America in this offering or if the underwriters exercise their overallotment option. We will also not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the Series A Preferred Stock in the concurrent offering.


DIVIDEND POLICY

        Our board of directors does not anticipate authorizing the payment of cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any determination to pay dividends to holders of our common stock in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on many factors, including our financial condition, results of operations, general business conditions, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects, restrictions on the payment of dividends under Delaware Law, and any other factors our board of directors deems relevant. We have not historically paid dividends to Rio Tinto.

        Our Series A Preferred Stock will pay on a cumulative basis when, as and if declared by our board of directors, dividends at a rate of        % of the liquidation preference of $50 per share, payable quarterly in arrears in cash, shares of our common stock or a combination thereof at our election when declared by our board of directors. Any determination to pay dividends on our Series A Preferred Stock, and whether to pay in cash or common stock, will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on many factors, including financial condition, results of operations, general business conditions, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects, restrictions on the payment of dividends under Delaware law, and any other factors our board of directors deems relevant.

49


Table of Contents


SEPARATION TRANSACTIONS AND RELATED AGREEMENTS

        Prior to the completion of this offering and the concurrent offering our business was conducted by RTEA, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto America. RTEA owned Rio Tinto America's western U.S. coal business consisting of five coal mines, including the interest in the Decker mine, as well as certain other businesses, including the Colowyo mine and the uranium property. In connection with this offering, Rio Tinto America:

Corporate History

        The Rio Tinto Group initially formed RTEA in 1993 as Kennecott Coal Company which was subsequently renamed Kennecott Energy and Coal Company. Between 1993 and 1998, RTEA acquired the Antelope, Colowyo, Jacobs Ranch and Spring Creek coal mines, the Cordero coal mine and the Caballo Rojo coal mine, which are currently operated together as the Cordero Rojo coal mine, and a 50% interest in the Decker coal mine, which is managed by a third-party mine operator. In 2006, Kennecott Energy and Coal Company was renamed Rio Tinto Energy America Inc., as part of Rio Tinto's global branding initiative.

Formation of Cloud Peak

        Cloud Peak Energy Inc. was incorporated in Delaware on July 31, 2008 in preparation for this offering. Prior to this offering, it did not engage in any activities, except in preparation for this offering, and has had no operations. Rio Tinto America currently owns all of the issued and outstanding

50


Table of Contents


common stock of Cloud Peak Energy Inc. The diagram below depicts our summarized organizational structure prior to this offering:

GRAPHIC

Separation of Certain Businesses from Us

        In order to separate certain businesses from us, on October 7, 2008, Rio Tinto America distributed out the Colowyo coal mine entities and the uranium property entities from RTEA to Rio Tinto America. As a result, RTEA and RTEASC, a subsidiary of Rio Tinto America that provides services and other support to RTEA, own and operate Rio Tinto America's western U.S. coal business, except for the Colowyo mine in Colorado. Due to the terms, conditions and other restrictions contained in the existing financing arrangements with respect to the Colowyo mine, the Colowyo mine will not be transferred to Cloud Peak Energy.

Separation of Our Business from Rio Tinto America

        Immediately prior to the closing of this offering and the concurrent offering, in order to separate RTEA and RTEASC from Rio Tinto America, we will engage in a merger transaction, after which

51


Table of Contents


RTEA and RTEASC, as the surviving entities of the merger, will become wholly owned subsidiaries of Cloud Peak Energy Inc. As consideration for the stock of RTEA and RTEASC, Rio Tinto America will receive:

        In addition, in connection with the merger transaction, we will assume certain liabilities of Rio Tinto and enter into the Tax Receivable Agreement and the Registration Rights Agreement with Rio Tinto America, among other separation-related agreements.

        We will issue our common stock and Series A Preferred Stock to Rio Tinto America in a private offering in reliance on the exemption from registration requirements provided by Section 4(2) under the Securities Act.

        Prior to the completion of this offering and the concurrent offering, Rio Tinto America will own 100% of our common stock and our Series A Preferred Stock. Upon completion of this offering and the concurrent offering, Rio Tinto America will beneficially own approximately            % of our outstanding common stock, assuming the underwriters' over-allotment option is not exercised (            % if the underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full), and no shares of our outstanding Series A Preferred Stock. Rio Tinto America has informed us that, after the completion of this offering, it intends, subject to market conditions, to divest its remaining interest in us. The diagram

52


Table of Contents


below depicts our summarized organizational structure immediately after the separation and the completion of this offering and the concurrent offering:

GRAPHIC

Separation-Related Agreements

        In connection with our separation from Rio Tinto America, we are entering into various agreements governing our relationship with Rio Tinto America and its affiliates as a stand-alone public company.

53


Table of Contents

        We summarize these agreements below, which summaries are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of the agreements which are filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.

Master Separation Agreement

        Prior to the completion of this offering, we will enter into a Master Separation Agreement with Rio Tinto America. The Master Separation Agreement will set forth our agreements with Rio Tinto America regarding the principal arrangements required to transfer to us Rio Tinto America's western U.S. coal business, other than the Colowyo mine entities and the uranium property entities. It also will set forth other agreements governing our relationship after the separation.

        Except as expressly set forth in the Master Separation Agreement or in any other transaction document, neither we nor Rio Tinto America will make any representation or warranty as to the assets, businesses or liabilities transferred, assumed or acquired as part of the separation. Except as expressly set forth in any transaction document, all assets will be transferred on an "as is," "where is" basis, and we and our subsidiaries will agree to bear the economic and legal risks that any conveyance was insufficient to vest in us good title, free and clear of any security interest or other encumbrance, and that any necessary consents or approvals are not obtained or that any requirements of laws or judgments are not complied with.

        We will agree to provide certain financial information related to our business on an IFRS basis and information regarding our reserves to Rio Tinto America or its affiliates for so long as Rio Tinto America or its affiliates are required to account for their investment in us on a consolidated basis or under the equity method of accounting. The agreement will also contain covenants requiring us to disclose on a timely basis information about us to, or otherwise cooperate with, Rio Tinto or its affiliates in connection with any information needed by Rio Tinto or any of its affiliates for preparation of their filings or reports with any governmental authority, national securities exchange or otherwise made publicly available, among other covenants.

        The Master Separation Agreement will also provide for other arrangements with respect to the mutual sharing of information between us and Rio Tinto America and its affiliates in order to comply with reporting, filing, audit or tax requirements, for use in judicial proceedings, and in order to comply with our respective obligations after the completion of this offering. We will also agree to provide mutual access to historical records relating to our businesses.

        Except for each party's obligations under the Master Separation Agreement, the other transaction documents and certain other specified liabilities, we and Rio Tinto America will release and discharge each other and each of our affiliates from all liabilities existing or arising between us on or before the separation, including in connection with the separation and this offering. The release does not include obligations or liabilities under any agreements between us and Rio Tinto America or its affiliates that remain in effect following the separation.

        We will indemnify Rio Tinto America for claims and liabilities related to our business whether arising before, on, or after the separation, and liabilities relating to any untrue statement of, or omission to state a material fact in any registration statement or prospectus or offering document related to this offering or the concurrent offering or offering of debt securities, except for statements or omissions relating exclusively to Rio Tinto plc or information relating to and provided by any

54


Table of Contents


underwriter expressly for use in the registration statement or prospectus. In addition, Rio Tinto America will agree to indemnify us for claims and liabilities related to the Colowyo mine and the uranium business, which will not be transferred to Cloud Peak Energy in connection with this offering. Rio Tinto America will also indemnify us for liabilities relating to any untrue statement of, or omission to state a material fact in any registration statement or prospectus related to this offering or the concurrent offering or offering of debt securities relating exclusively to Rio Tinto plc.

        Rio Tinto America or an affiliate of Rio Tinto America will pay for our benefit all out-of pocket costs and expenses (including all underwriting fees, discounts and commissions and other direct costs) incurred in connection with our separation from Rio Tinto America, this offering, the concurrent offering or offering of debt securities and in connection with the other debt and credit facilities described in this prospectus or that we have entered into or intend to incur or enter into concurrently with or shortly after the completion of this offering.

        Rio Tinto will continue to hold certain coal assets in the U.S. and abroad following the completion of this offering. The Colowyo mine in Colorado will not be transferred to Cloud Peak Energy but has been included in our historical business and may compete with our continuing business. Rio Tinto may expand, through development of its remaining coal business, acquisitions or otherwise, its operations that directly or indirectly compete with us. The Master Separation Agreement will provide that for one year following the completion of this offering, Rio Tinto America or its affiliates will not pursue any competitive activity or acquisition in the coal industry within the PRB. Rio Tinto America and its affiliates will not be prohibited from pursuing any competitive activity or acquisition outside of the PRB, whether during or after this one-year period. Following the completion of this offering, if a corporate opportunity is offered to Rio Tinto America or its affiliates or one or more of Rio Tinto America's or its affiliates' executive officers or directors that relates to any competitive activity or acquisition in the coal industry:

no such person shall be liable to us or any of our shareholders (or any affiliate thereof) for breach of any fiduciary or other duty by reason of the fact that the person, including Rio Tinto and its affiliates, pursues or acquires the business opportunity, directs the business opportunity to another person or fails to present the business opportunity, or information regarding the business opportunity, to us, unless, in the case of any person who is a director or officer of us, the business opportunity is expressly offered to the director or executive officer in his or her capacity as an executive officer or director of our company. See "Description of Capital Stock—Corporate Opportunities."

        We will agree with Rio Tinto America and its affiliates that for a period of 12 months following the completion of this offering and the concurrent offering, neither we nor Rio Tinto America nor its affiliates will solicit any employee of the other company, subject to certain exceptions.

        The Master Separation Agreement also will contain covenants between us and Rio Tinto America and its affiliates with respect to, among other covenants:

55


Table of Contents

Merger Agreement

        We intend to enter into a Merger Agreement whereby two of our wholly owned subsidiaries will merge with and into RTEA and RTEASC, after which RTEA and RTEASC, as the surviving entities, will be our wholly owned subsidiaries.

Transition Services Agreement

        Historically, members of the Rio Tinto Group have provided key services to us, including services related to treasury, accounting, procurement, legal services, information technology, employee benefit and welfare plans, among other services. Prior to the completion of this offering, we will enter into a Transition Services Agreement with an affiliate of Rio Tinto pursuant to which this Rio Tinto affiliate will agree to continue to provide us with certain of these key services for a transition period of approximately nine months.

        Pursuant to the Transition Services Agreement, the Rio Tinto affiliate will provide services to us, including:

We also will agree with the Rio Tinto affiliate that, if any additional transition services are needed to comply with applicable laws or to satisfy accounting standards, upon our mutual agreement, these additional services will be provided at the cost of the party requesting these additional services.

        We have agreed to pay the Rio Tinto affiliate for such services as set forth in the Transition Services Agreement. We expect that the total amounts paid to the Rio Tinto affiliate under the Transition Services Agreement will be approximately $                        per month. However, if the term of any service provided under the agreement is extended or if there is a material change in the assumptions used by us and the Rio Tinto affiliate in determining the costs to be charged for the service, the amounts payable to the Rio Tinto affiliate may be adjusted accordingly as mutually agreed to by us and the Rio Tinto affiliate.

        The services provided under the Transition Services Agreement will terminate at various times specified in the agreement (generally ranging from three months to nine months). However, we may elect to terminate the provision of any or all of the transition services upon 60 days notice to the Rio Tinto affiliate. In addition, the Rio Tinto affiliate may immediately terminate the Transition Services Agreement if we fail to make any payment due to the Rio Tinto affiliate within 30 days after receipt of written notice of this failure, except with respect to amounts in issue that are subject to a bona fide dispute between us and the Rio Tinto affiliate.

Tax Receivable Agreement

        This offering and related transactions are expected to increase our subsidiaries' tax bases in their tangible and intangible assets, as well as our basis in the equity of our subsidiaries. These increases in tax basis are expected to increase depreciation, amortization and cost depletion deductions and therefore reduce the amount of tax that we would otherwise be required to pay in the future, although

56


Table of Contents


the U.S. Internal Revenue Service or state authorities may challenge all or part of that basis increase, and a court could sustain such a challenge.

        We intend to enter into a Tax Receivable Agreement with Rio Tinto America or its affiliate that will provide for the payment by us to Rio Tinto America or its affiliate of 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax or franchise tax that we will actually realize (or are deemed to realize in the case of an early termination payment by us or a change in control, as discussed below) as a result of these increases in tax basis and of certain other tax benefits related to our entering into the Tax Receivable Agreement, including tax benefits attributable to payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement. We expect to benefit from the remaining 15% of cash savings, if any, in income or franchise tax that we realize. For purposes of the Tax Receivable Agreement, it is intended that cash savings in income and franchise tax will be computed by comparing our actual income and franchise tax liability to the amount of such taxes that we would have been required to pay had our subsidiaries not increased their tax bases in their tangible and intangible assets, had we not increased our tax basis in the equity of our subsidiaries, as a result of the section 338 elections and had we not entered into the Tax Receivable Agreement. The term of the Tax Receivable Agreement will commence upon consummation of this offering and will continue until all such tax benefits have been utilized or expired, unless we exercise our right to terminate the Tax Receivable Agreement for an amount based on the agreed payments remaining to be made under the agreement. Estimating the amount of payments that may be made under the Tax Receivable Agreement is, by its nature, imprecise, because the amount and timing of payments due under the Tax Receivable Agreement will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the amount and timing of our income. If we do not have taxable income in a taxable year, we are not required to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement for that taxable year because we will not have actually realized tax savings for that year.

        Due to the size of the increases in our subsidiaries' tax bases in their tangible and intangible assets, as well as the increase in our basis in the equity of our subsidiaries, we expect to make substantial payments to Rio Tinto America or its affiliate under the Tax Receivable Agreement. Assuming no material changes in the relevant tax law and that we earn sufficient taxable income to realize the full tax benefit of the increased depreciation, amortization and cost depletion deductions, we expect that future payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement in respect of the purchase will range from approximately $             million to $             million in the aggregate over the term of the agreement (assuming an initial public offering price of             , the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), and will be payable over the next            years. The payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement will not be conditioned upon Rio Tinto America's or its affiliate's continued ownership of our common stock.

        In addition, we expect that the Tax Receivable Agreement will provide that, upon certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control, our (or our successors') obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement would be based on certain assumptions, including that we would have sufficient taxable income to fully utilize the deductions arising from the increased tax deductions and tax basis and other benefits related to entering into the Tax Receivable Agreement.

        Decisions we make in the course of running our business, such as with respect to mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes in control, may influence the timing and amount of payments that we may be required to make to Rio Tinto America or its affiliate under the Tax Receivable Agreement. For example, a disposition of assets that takes place soon after this offering could accelerate payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement and increase the present value of such payments relative to the present value of the payments that would have been made under the Tax Receivable Agreement if there had been no such disposition of assets.

57


Table of Contents

Registration Rights

        In connection with this offering, Rio Tinto America will enter into a Registration Rights Agreement with us relating to the shares of common stock they will hold after this offering. Subject to several exceptions, Rio Tinto America will have the right to require us to register for public resale under the Securities Act all shares of common stock that Rio Tinto America requests be registered at any time after the expiration or waiver of the lock-up period following this offering. Rio Tinto America will have the right to demand several such registrations. In addition, Rio Tinto America has been granted piggyback rights on any registration for our account or the account of another shareholder, subject to customary cutback provisions. We would be responsible for the expenses of any such registration (other than underwriters discounts or commissions) and will indemnify Rio Tinto America for certain securities law liabilities arising out of any such registration.

Trademark Licence Agreement

        Prior to the completion of this offering and the concurrent offering, we will enter into a Trademark Licence Agreement with an affiliate of Rio Tinto. Pursuant to the Trademark Licence Agreement, an affiliate of Rio Tinto will grant us a limited license, for a      -day transition period following the completion of this offering and the concurrent offering, to use the "RIO TINTO" trademarks in any materials, advertising, domain names and web pages that were existing prior to the completion of this offering and the concurrent offering.

58


Table of Contents


CAPITALIZATION

        The following table sets forth our capitalization as of June 30, 2008:


        RTEA is considered to be our predecessor for accounting purposes and its consolidated financial statements are our historical consolidated financial statements.

        This table should be read in conjunction with "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements," "Use of Proceeds," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information," and the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in this prospectus.

 
  As of June 30, 2008  
 
  Actual   Pro Forma  
 
  (dollars in thousands,
except share and
per share amounts)

 

Cash and cash equivalents(1)

  $ 16,507   $    
           

Long-term debt-related party(2)

  $ 541,879   $  

Long-term debt-bonds(3)(4)

    136,175      

Long-term debt-other(3)

    53,723     44,898  

Revolving credit facility(5)

           

Term loan(6)

           

Senior notes(7)

           

Shareholders' equity

             
 

Common stock ($0.01 par value,             shares authorized; 1 share issued and outstanding on an actual basis; and             shares issued and outstanding on a pro forma basis)

           
 

Series A Preferred Stock ($0.01 par value,             shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding on an actual basis; and          shares issued and outstanding on a pro forma basis)(8)

           
 

Additional paid-in capital

    171,117        
 

Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)

    126,223        
 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

    (1,738 )   9,372  
           

Total shareholders' equity

    295,602        
           

Total capitalization

  $ 1,027,379   $    
           

59


Table of Contents

60


Table of Contents


UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

        The following table sets forth our unaudited pro forma and actual consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 and for the six months ended June 30, 2008, and the unaudited pro forma and actual consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2008. We have derived the actual consolidated statement of operations data for the year ended December 31, 2007 from the audited consolidated financial statements of Rio Tinto Energy America Inc., as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the actual consolidated statement of operations data for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and the actual consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2008 from the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Rio Tinto Energy America Inc. as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2008, included elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited financial information was prepared on a basis consistent with that used in preparing our audited consolidated financial statements and includes all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring items, that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the unaudited periods.

        RTEA is considered to be our predecessor for accounting purposes and its consolidated financial statements are our historical consolidated financial statements.

        The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information is based on our actual consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this prospectus, which, prior to the consummation of the offering were prepared on a carve-out basis from our ultimate parent company, Rio Tinto and its subsidiaries; such carve-out information is not intended to be a complete presentation of the operating results or financial position of our company on a stand-alone basis. The carve-out consolidated financial statements include allocations of corporate, general and administrative expenses and Rio Tinto headquarters overhead expenses. We do not expect to continue to incur some of these charges as a stand-alone public company. These allocations were based upon various assumptions and estimates and actual results may differ from these allocations, assumptions and estimates. Accordingly, the carve-out consolidated financial statements should not be relied upon as being representative of our financial position or operating results had we operated on a stand-alone basis, nor are they representative of our financial position or operating results following the offering.

        The unaudited pro forma adjustments are based on available information and certain assumptions that we believe are reasonable, which are described below in the accompanying notes.

        The accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2008 is presented:

        The accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 are presented:

        The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with the sections of this prospectus entitled "Selected Consolidated Financial and Operating Data,"

61


Table of Contents


"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements" and our historical consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information is for informational purposes only, and are not intended to represent what our results of operations would be after giving effect to the offering, or to indicate our results of operations for any future period. Therefore, investors should not place undue reliance on the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information.

62


Table of Contents


Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 2008

 
  Actual   Elimination of
Non-contributed
Entities(a)
  Adjustments
for the
Separation
  Subtotal   Adjustments
for the
Series A
Preferred Stock,
the offering and
Debt Financing
  Pro Forma  
 
  (dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
 

ASSETS

                                     

Current assets

                                     
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 16,507   $ (17 ) $     $ 16,490   $              (j) $    
 

Restricted cash

    1,037     (1,037 )                    
 

Accounts receivable, net

    94,717     (6,231 )         88,486           88,486  
 

Due from related parties

        83,789     (82,615 )(e)   1,174           1,174  
 

Restricted accounts receivable

    1,354     (1,354 )                    
 

Inventories, net

    83,235     (11,722 )         71,513           71,513  
 

Deferred income taxes

    30,447     (37 )                (f)                  
 

Refundable deposit

    53,207               53,207           53,207  
 

Other assets

    6,412     (1,231 )         5,181                  (j)      
                           

Total current assets

    286,916     62,160                          
 

Property, plant and equipment, net

    1,325,536     (79,047 )         1,246,489           1,246,489  
 

Intangible assets, net

    66,530               66,530           66,530  
 

Deferred income taxes

                (f)                  
 

Goodwill

    35,634               35,634           35,634  
 

Other assets

    12,031     (983 )         11,048                  (j)      
                           

Total assets

  $ 1,726,647   $ (17,870 ) $     $     $     $    
                           

LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

                                     

Current liabilities

                                     
 

Accounts payable

  $ 72,815   $ (10,194 ) $     $ 62,621   $     $ 62,621  
 

Royalties and production taxes

    126,204     (7,174 )         119,030           119,030  
 

Accrued expenses

    49,872         (4,812 )(e)   45,060           45,060  
 

Due to related parties

    106,053         (106,053
          
)(e)
  (f)
               
 

Current portion of long-term debt—bonds

    8,653     (8,653 )                      
 

Current portion of long-term debt—other

    36,144     (1,980 )         34,164                  (j)      
                           

Total current liabilities

    399,741     (28,001 )                        
 

Long-term debt—related party

    541,879         (541,879 )(e)                
 

Long-term debt—bonds

    127,522     (127,522 )                          (j)      
 

Long-term debt—term loan

                                         (j)      
 

Long-term debt—other

    17,579     (6,845 )         10,734           10,734  
 

Tax agreement liability—related party

                         (f)                  
 

Asset retirement obligations

    226,780     (25,117 )         201,663           201,663  
 

Deferred income taxes

    112,061     9,553                  (f)                  
 

Other liabilities

    5,483     (582 )   (2,285
45,092
)(g)
 (h)
  2,616
45,092
          47,708  
                           

Total liabilities

    1,431,045     (178,514 )                        
                           

Shareholders' equity

                                     
 

Series A Preferred Stock (at liquidation value; $0.01 par value,             shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding on an actual basis; and             shares outstanding on a pro forma basis)

                                   (d)      
 

Common stock ($0.01 par value;            shares authorized; 1 share issued and outstanding on an actual basis; and            shares outstanding on a pro forma basis)

                                   (c)      
 

Additional paid-in capital

    171,117
    (136,896
)
  570,129
4,132
          
  (e)
  (g)
  (f)
                
          
  (c)
  (d)
     
 

Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)

    126,223     297,540     (1,847
(56,202
)(g)
)(h)
  365,714                  (j)      
 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

    (1,738 )         11,110   (h)   9,372           9,372  
                           

Total shareholders' equity

    295,602     160,644                          
                           

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

  $ 1,726,647   $ (17,870 ) $     $     $     $    
                           

See notes to unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information.

63


Table of Contents


Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

 
  Actual   Elimination of
Non-contributed
Entities(a)
  Adjustments
for the
Separation(b)
  Subtotal   Adjustments
for the
Series A
Preferred Stock,
the offering and
Debt Financing
  Pro Forma  
 
  (dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
 

Revenues

  $ 845,140   $ (55,401 ) $     $ 789,739   $     $ 789,739  

Costs and expenses

                                     
 

Cost of product sold (exclusive of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion, shown separately below)

    670,671     (63,762 )         606,909           606,909  
 

Depreciation and depletion

    73,465     (2,163 )         71,302           71,302  
 

Amortization

    28,403               28,403           28,403  
 

Accretion

    8,294     (1,123 )         7,171           7,171  
 

Exploration costs

    1,404               1,404           1,404  
 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

    39,976     (5,292 )       34,684     (2,211 )(b)   32,473  
                           
   

Total costs and expenses

    822,213     (72,340 )       749,873     (2,211 )   747,662  
                           

Operating income

   
22,927
   
16,939
   
   
39,866
   
2,211
   
42,077
 
                           

Other income (expense)

                                     
 

Interest income

    2,614     (90 )         2,524           2,524  
 

Interest expense

    (18,991 )   7,281     9,895 (e)   (1,815 )       (j)      
 

Other, net

    (291 )   47           (244 )         (244 )
                           

Total other income (expense)

    (16,668 )   7,238     9,895     465              
                           

Income before income tax provision and earnings from unconsolidated affiliates

    6,259     24,177     9,895     40,331              
 

Income tax provision

    (1,596 )   (9,428 )   (3,496 )(f)   (14,520 )       (f)      
 

Earnings from unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

    2,210               2,210           2,210  
                           

Net income

   
6,873
   
14,749
   
6,399
   
28,021
             
 

Less: Series A Preferred Stock dividends

                                 (d)      
                           

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

  $ 6,873   $ 14,749   $ 6,399   $ 28,021   $     $    
                           

Net income per share:

                                     
 

Basic

  $ 6,873                                
                                     
 

Diluted

  $ 6,873                                
                                     

Pro forma net income (loss) per share:

                                     
 

Basic(k)

                                $    
                                     
 

Diluted(k)

                                $    
                                     

Weighted average shares outstanding:

                                     
 

Basic(k)

    1                                
                                   
 

Diluted(k)

    1                                
                                   

See notes to unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information.

64


Table of Contents


Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2007

 
  Actual   Elimination of
Non-contributed
Entities(a)
  Adjustments
for the
Separation(b)
  Subtotal   Adjustments
for the
Series A
Preferred Stock,
the offering and
Debt Financing
  Pro Forma  
 
  (dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
 

Revenues

  $ 1,558,721   $ (138,919 ) $     $ 1,419,802   $     $ 1,419,802  

Costs and expenses

                                     
 

Cost of product sold (exclusive of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion, shown separately below)

    1,191,787     (113,483 )         1,078,304           1,078,304  
 

Depreciation and depletion

    139,167     (5,150 )         134,017           134,017  
 

Amortization

    42,312               42,312           42,312  
 

Accretion

    15,665     (491 )         15,174           15,174  
 

Exploration costs

    10,130     (6,600 )         3,530           3,530  
 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

    61,906     (9,975 )         51,931           51,931  
 

Asset impairment charges

    18,297         (18,297 )(i)              
                           
   

Total costs and expenses

    1,479,264     (135,699 )   (18,297 )   1,325,268         1,325,268  
                           
 

Operating income

    79,457     (3,220 )   18,297     94,534         94,534  
                           

Other income (expense)

                                     
 

Interest income

    7,577     (274 )         7,303           7,303  
 

Interest expense

    (54,262 )   14,624     33,816 (e)   (5,822 )     (j)      
 

Other, net

    99     175           274           274  
                           
 

Total other income (expense)

    (46,586 )   14,525     33,816     1,755              
                           

Income before income tax provision and earnings from unconsolidated affiliates

   
32,871
   
11,305
   
52,113
   
96,289
             
 

Income tax provision

    (2,489 )   (6,143 )   (26,032 )(f)   (34,664 )     (f)      
 

Earnings from unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

    2,462               2,462           2,462  
                           

Net income

   
32,844
   
5,162
   
26,081
   
64,087
             
 

Less: Series A Preferred Stock dividends

                      (d)      
                           

Net income (loss) available to common stockholders

  $ 32,844   $ 5,162   $ 26,081   $ 64,087   $     $    
                           

Net income per share:

                                     
 

Basic

  $ 32,844                                
                                     
 

Diluted

  $ 32,844                                
                                     

Pro forma net income (loss) per share:

                                     
 

Basic(k)

                                $    
                                     
 

Diluted(k)

                                $    
                                     

Weighted average shares outstanding:

                                     
 

Basic(k)

    1                                
                                   
 

Diluted(k)

    1                                
                                   

See notes to unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information.

65


Table of Contents


Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information

        (a)   Reflects the elimination of the accounts of certain mining entities which will remain with Rio Tinto America after the separation. RTEA transferred its interests in such entities to Rio Tinto America on October 7, 2008, and those interests will not be contributed to Cloud Peak Energy Inc. The eliminated amounts are as follows:

Year Ended December 31, 2007

 
  Colowyo   Uranium
Property
  Total
Non-contributed
Entities
 
 
  (dollars in thousands)
 

Revenues

  $ 138,919   $   $ 138,919  

Costs and expenses

                   
 

Cost of product sold

    113,467     16     113,483  
 

Depreciation and depletion

    5,150         5,150  
 

Accretion

    893     (402 )   491  
 

Selling, general and administrative

    8,427     1,548     9,975  
 

Exploration costs

        6,600     6,600  
               
   

Total costs and expenses

    127,937     7,762     135,699  
               

Operating income

    10,982     (7,762 )   3,220  
               

Other income (expense)

                   
 

Interest income

    274         274  
 

Interest expense

    (14,624 )       (14,624 )
 

Other, net

    (175 )       (175 )
               
   

Total other income (expense)

    (14,525 )       (14,525 )
               

Loss before income tax benefit

    (3,543 )   (7,762 )   (11,305 )
 

Income tax benefit

    3,368     2,775     6,143  
               

Net income (loss)

  $ (175 ) $ (4,987 ) $ (5,162 )
               

Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

 
  Colowyo   Uranium
Property
  Total
Non-contributed
Entities
 
 
  (dollars in thousands)
 

Revenues

  $ 55,401   $   $ 55,401  

Costs and expenses

                   
 

Cost of product sold

    63,757     5     63,762  
 

Depreciation and depletion

    2,163         2,163  
 

Accretion

    442     681     1,123  
 

Selling, general and administrative

    4,255     1,037     5,292  
               
   

Total costs and expenses

    70,617     1,723     72,340  
               

Operating income

    (15,216 )   (1,723 )   (16,939 )
               

Other income (expense)

                   
 

Interest income

    90         90  
 

Interest expense

    (7,281 )       (7,281 )
 

Other, net

    (47 )       (47 )
               
   

Total other income (expense)

    (7,238 )       (7,238 )
               

Loss before income tax benefit

    (22,454 )   (1,723 )   (24,177 )
 

Income tax benefit

    627     8,801     9,428  
               

Net income (loss)

  $ (21,827 ) $ 7,078   $ (14,749 )
               

66


Table of Contents

As of June 30, 2008

 
  Colowyo   Uranium
Property
  Total
Non-contributed
Entities
 
 
  (dollars in thousands)
 

ASSETS

                   

Current assets

                   
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 17   $   $ 17  
 

Restricted cash

    1,037         1,037  
 

Accounts receivable, net

    6,231         6,231  
 

Due from related parties

    (71,569 )   (12,220 )   (83,789 )
 

Restricted accounts receivable

    1,354         1,354  
 

Inventories

    11,722         11,722  
 

Deferred income taxes

        37     37  
 

Other assets

    1,194     37     1,231  
               
   

Total current assets

    (50,014 )   (12,146 )   (62,160 )
 

Property, plant and equipment, net

    78,953     94     79,047  
 

Intangible assets, net

                   
 

Other assets

    883     100     983  
               
     

Total assets

  $ 29,822   $ (11,952 ) $ 17,870  
               

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

                   

Current liabilities

                   
 

Accounts payable

  $ 9,921   $ 273   $ 10,194  
 

Accrued expenses

    7,135     39     7,174  
 

Current portion of long-term debt, bonds

    8,653         8,653  
 

Current portion of long-term debt

    1,980         1,980  
               
   

Total current liabilities

    27,689     312     28,001  
 

Long-term debt—bonds

    127,522         127,522  
 

Long-term debt—other

    6,845         6,845  
 

Asset retirement obligations

    11,209     13,908     25,117  
 

Deferred income taxes

    (2,339 )   (7,214 )   (9,553 )
 

Other liabilities

    555     27     582  
               
     

Total liabilities

    171,481     7,033     178,514  
               

Shareholders' equity

                   

Additional paid-in capital

    60,803     76,093     136,896  

Retained earnings

    (202,462 )   (95,078 )   (297,540 )
               
   

Total shareholders' equity

    (141,659 )   (18,985 )   (160,644 )
               
     

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

  $ 29,822   $ (11,952 ) $ 17,870  
               

        (b)   Our carve-out historical consolidated financial statements include allocations of corporate, general and administrative expenses and Rio Tinto headquarters overhead costs. Many of the allocations of corporate, general and administrative expenses relate to services provided to us under the shared services agreement with an affiliate of Rio Tinto America, which will continue for a transition period of approximately nine months under a Transition Services Agreement (see "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements"). The allocations of Rio Tinto headquarters overhead costs will not continue when we are a stand-alone public company. However, we will incur additional costs for financial reporting and compliance, corporate governance, treasury and investor relations activities, which includes additional compensation to current and future employees and professional fees to

67


Table of Contents


external service providers, that are in addition to our historical costs. Based on our preliminary analysis, we estimate that our annual general and administrative expenses as a stand-alone public company will exceed the general and administrative expenses reported in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007, by approximately $            to $              . This amount is preliminary and the actual amount incurred may be materially different. However, no pro forma adjustments have been made for these additional expenses in our unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of operations, as an estimate is not objectively determinable and factually supportable.

        Our general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008, includes $10.2 million in costs associated with an initiative by Rio Tinto to prepare for Cloud Peak Energy Inc.'s initial public offering. We have determined that $2.2 million of such costs are non-recurring expenses directly attributable to the initial public offering, and have recorded an adjustment to eliminate those costs from our unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The remaining $8.0 million of costs relate to financial statement preparation and audit fees, which we have incurred to prepare for this offering, a portion of which we do not expect to incur on an annual basis.

        (c)   Reflects the issuance of                    shares of our common stock, $0.01 par value to Rio Tinto America as part of our separation, in partial consideration for causing RTEA and RTEASC to enter into merger transactions, after which, RTEA and RTEASC will become our wholly owned subsidiaries (see "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements"). We have recorded an adjustment in our unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet to increase common stock and decrease additional paid-in capital by $          , representing the par value of the shares being issued.

        (d)   Reflects the concurrent and contingent issuance of                shares of our  % Series A Mandatory Convertible Preferred Voting Stock, $0.01 par value, to RTA as part of our separation, in partial consideration for causing RTEA and RTEASC to enter into merger transactions, after which, RTEA and RTEASC will become our wholly owned subsidiaries (see "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements"). The Series A Preferred Stock has a $50.00 per share liquidation value and, unless previously converted, will automatically convert to shares of common stock in 2011 (See "Description of Capital Stock—Preferred Stock"). We have recorded an adjustment in our unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet to increase preferred stock and decrease additional paid-in capital by $              , representing the value of the shares being issued.

        We also have recorded adjustments in our unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of operations to reflect dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock of $            and $            for the year ended December 31, 2007, and the six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.

        (e)   Reflects the conversion of the current and long-term portions of our long-term debt—related party, and amounts due from/to related parties to equity. The conversion of the long-term debt portions was completed on September 24, 2008. We have recorded a $570.1 million credit to additional paid-in capital and other adjustments in our unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet to reflect the conversion to equity and anticipated conversion to equity of the following amounts due from (due to) related parties at June 30, 2008, excluding amounts for the non-contributed entities:

 
  June 30, 2008  
 
  (dollars in thousands)
 

Due from related parties—current

  $ 82,615  

Accrued expenses

    (4,812 )

Due to related parties—current

    (106,053 )

Long term debt—related party

    (541,879 )
       

Total

  $ (570,129 )
       

68


Table of Contents

        Accordingly, interest expense (net of amounts capitalized) incurred on related party debt of $33.8 million and $9.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, and the six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, have been eliminated from our unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of operations.

        (f)    We intend to make an election under Section 338(h)(10) of the Internal Revenue Code to treat the transactions contemplated in our separation as an asset sale. See "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements." As a result of this election, the tax basis of certain of our assets will be increased to reflect their current fair market values based on the offering prices for our common stock and Series A Preferred Stock. This increase in the tax basis of our assets, together with certain other changes in our tax attributes caused by our separation, will result in adjustments to deferred income taxes recorded on our consolidated balance sheet. Accordingly, we have recorded adjustments in our unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2008, to eliminate the $121.6 million deferred tax liability, record noncurrent deferred tax assets of $              , and reduce current deferred tax assets by $          .

        Concurrent and contingent with this offering, we also will enter into a Tax Receivable Agreement with Rio Tinto America, or its affiliate, that will provide for the payment by us to Rio Tinto America, or its affiliate, of 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax or franchise tax that we realize as a result of the increase in tax basis and of certain other tax benefits related to our entering into the Tax Receivable Agreement, including tax benefits attributable to payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement. See "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements—Separation-related Agreements—Tax Receivable Agreement." In the unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2008, we have recorded a current liability of $            and a noncurrent liability of $              , representing our estimate, using assumptions consistent with those used in evaluating whether a deferred tax asset valuation allowance is required, of the undiscounted amounts that we expect to pay to Rio Tinto America under this agreement. The aggregate liability recorded for the Tax Receivable Agreement is lower than 85% of the recorded increase in deferred tax assets resulting from our separation, primarily due to the effects of percentage depletion, which is calculated independent of the tax basis of the underlying coal reserves. The increase in the tax basis of our reserves results in tax savings only to a limited extent where the increased tax basis provides depletion deductions in excess of percentage depletion. This limitation on tax savings reduces the liability under the Tax Receivable Agreement, but does not affect the calculation of the deferred tax asset.

        As the pro forma adjustments to adjust deferred income taxes and record the liability under the Tax Receivable Agreement are the result of transactions with our parent company, we have recorded corresponding adjustments to additional paid-in capital. The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2008 reflects a net increase in additional paid-in capital of $              , which consists of a $                  increase to reflect the deferred tax adjustments resulting from the tax basis increase and other effects of our separation, offset by a $              decrease to reflect the liability for the Tax Receivable Agreement with Rio Tinto America or its affiliates.

        The amount of the increase in the tax basis of our assets is preliminary and is subject to final tax appraisal. Changes from our preliminary estimates may occur and may be significant to the presentation of our consolidated financial statements.

        The adjustments to the tax basis of our assets resulting from our election under Section 338(h)(10) will increase our effective income tax rate. We have recorded pro forma adjustments to our income tax provision to reflect a pro forma effective tax rate of 36.0%. The increased rate is primarily attributable to the effects of depletion. Percentage depletion in excess of basis, which reduced the effective tax rate in historical periods, is not expected to occur in the near term as a result of the increase in tax basis of our depleting assets.

69


Table of Contents

        (g)   As a result of our separation from Rio Tinto America, the vesting of awards under certain of Rio Tinto's existing share-based compensation arrangements will accelerate as provided in the original terms of those awards. We will record additional compensation expense of $1.8 million to reflect the accelerated vesting; however, no pro forma adjustment for this amount is included in the unaudited pro forma consolidated income statements because it does not have a continuing impact on our operations. Pursuant to the Employee Matters Agreement, Rio Tinto will retain the obligation to settle existing awards that are expected to be settled in cash and which are recorded as liabilities. We have recorded adjustments in our unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2008 to reflect a $1.8 million charge to retained earnings resulting from acceleration of vesting, a $2.3 million decrease in other liabilities resulting from Rio Tinto's retention of cash-settled awards, with a corresponding $4.1 million credit to additional paid-in capital.

        (h)   In connection with our separation, we will sponsor new defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. Through those plans we will assume benefit obligations related to certain of our employees who currently participate in similar plans sponsored by Rio Tinto. A trust for our new pension plan will receive a transfer of assets from the existing Rio Tinto pension trust. We have recorded adjustments in our unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2008 to reflect a $45.1 million increase in other liabilities, representing the assumption of pension and other postretirement benefit obligations of $54.5 million and $26.0 million, respectively, less $35.5 million for the fair value of funded pension assets. We have recorded a $11.1 million credit to accumulated other comprehensive income for unrecognized components of our historical pension and postretirement benefit cost and a $56.2 million charge to retained earnings to reflect the aggregate effect of these transactions with Rio Tinto.

        (i)    We have recorded a pro forma adjustment of $18.3 million to eliminate our asset impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2007, which relates to the abandonment of an ERP systems implementation. The ERP systems implementation was a worldwide Rio Tinto initiative designed to align processes, procedures, practices and reporting across all Rio Tinto business units. The implementation would have taken RTEA's stand-alone ERP system and moved it to a shared Rio Tinto platform, which could not be transferred to a new standalone company. It also would have enforced Rio Tinto specific processes, procedures, practices and reporting which were specific to Rio Tinto.

        (j)    Concurrent and contingent with this offering, we will enter into debt agreements that provide for borrowings under senior notes, a term loan and a revolving credit facility. The senior notes and term loan will be funded concurrent with the offering. The senior notes have a principal amount of $              , are assumed to bear fixed interest at           % and have a term to maturity of          years. The term loan has a principal amount of $              , bears variable interest based on LIBOR, and requires $              of annual principal amortization with a term to maturity of       years. The revolving credit facility provides for maximum borrowings of $              which bear variable interest based on LIBOR, and has a term to maturity of       years. We do not expect to draw on the revolving credit facility concurrent with the offering although we will have outstanding letters of credit. We will incur lender fees and other financing costs totaling approximately $            in connection with these debt agreements at the time of the offering. We expect to retain $            of the net proceeds from these financing transactions and pay the remaining amounts to Rio Tinto America, which will be accounted for as a dividend, concurrent with the offering. We have recorded adjustments in our unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2008 to reflect the effects of these transactions.

        We have recorded interest expense related to this debt financing of $            and $            in the unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007, and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. For our LIBOR-based borrowings, pro forma interest expense is based on the applicable LIBOR rate as of June 30, 2008. Pro forma interest expense reflects periodic commitment fees, the amortization of up-front lender fees and other financing costs over the terms of the related debt, and is net of amounts required to be capitalized. A 1/8th% variance in the

70


Table of Contents


interest rates that apply to our debt financing would result in a change in pro forma net income (loss) of $      and $      for the year ended December 31, 2007, and the six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.

        (k)   Pro forma basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the year ended December 31, 2007, and the six months ended June 30, 2008, reflect                       weighted average shares that will be issued in the offering. Restricted shares and options that are expected to be granted concurrent with the offering have been excluded from the calculation of pro forma diluted net income (loss) per share because they are not dilutive. In determining whether restricted shares and options are dilutive, we have assumed that the weighted average share price during the period is equal to the offering price. We have not assumed the conversion of our Series A Preferred Stock in the calculation of pro forma diluted net income per share because the assumed conversion is antidilutive.

71


Table of Contents


SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA

        The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial and other data on a historical basis. The information below should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in this prospectus.

        RTEA is considered to be our predecessor for accounting purposes and its consolidated financial statements are our historical consolidated financial statements. Our historical consolidated financial statements include financial information for certain operations that will not be transferred to Cloud Peak Energy in connection with this offering, including with respect to the Colowyo coal mine which represented 8.9% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007. As a result, our historical consolidated financial statements are not comparable to the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information included elsewhere in this prospectus or to the results investors should expect after the offering. To date, Cloud Peak Energy has had no operations. As described in "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements," through a merger transaction RTEA, our predecessor, and RTEASC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto, will become our wholly owned subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements of RTEA are provided elsewhere in this prospectus.

        We have derived the actual consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 from the audited consolidated financial statements of RTEA included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the actual consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2004 from the unaudited consolidated financial data of RTEA not included in this prospectus. We have derived the actual consolidated financial data as of June 30, 2008 and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 from the unaudited consolidated financial statements of RTEA included elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and results of operations for the periods presented. The interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of operations for a full fiscal year.

        Prior to the consummation of the offering, our consolidated financial statements were prepared on a carve-out basis from our ultimate parent company, Rio Tinto and its subsidiaries. The carve-out consolidated financial statements include allocations of corporate, general and administrative expenses and Rio Tinto headquarters overhead expenses. We do not expect to continue to incur some of these charges as a stand-alone public company. These allocations were based upon various assumptions and estimates and actual results may differ from these allocations, assumptions and estimates. Accordingly, the carve-out consolidated financial statements should not be relied upon as being representative of our financial position or operating results had we operated on a stand-alone basis, nor are they representative of our financial position or operating results following the offering.

72


Table of Contents


Selected Consolidated Financial and Other Data

 
  For the Years Ended December 31,   For the Six
Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
  2003(1)   2004   2005   2006   2007   2007   2008  
 
  (dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
 

Statement of Operations Data

                                           

Revenues(2)

  $ 856,013   $ 1,101,421   $ 1,179,643   $ 1,424,244   $ 1,558,721   $ 726,713   $ 845,140  

Costs and expenses

                                           
 

Cost of product sold (exclusive of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion, shown exclusively below)

    599,528     785,290     878,847     1,081,160     1,191,787     567,666     670,671  
 

Depreciation and depletion

    73,855     89,946     91,849     122,254     139,167     67,183     73,465  
 

Amortization(3)

    50,769     53,311     45,279     44,577     42,312     16,871     28,403  
 

Accretion

    8,809     9,811     11,485     14,334     15,665     7,244     8,294  
 

Exploration costs

        3,150     7,037     5,890     10,130     2,943     1,404  
 

Selling, general and administrative expenses(4)

    35,226     41,815     48,130     56,873     61,906     27,653     39,976  
 

Asset impairment charges(5)

        133,267             18,297          
                               

Total costs and expenses

    768,187     1,116,590     1,082,627     1,325,088     1,479,264     689,560     822,213  
                               

Total other expense

    (19,074 )   (47,771 )   (48,269 )   (52,849 )   (46,586 )   (23,487 )   (16,668 )
                               

Income (loss) before income tax benefit (provision), earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates and minority interest income

    68,752     (62,940 )   48,747     46,307     32,871     13,666     6,259  

Income tax benefit (provision)

    (21,493 )   21,327     (11,194 )   (6,894 )   (2,489 )   (1,043 )   (1,596 )

Earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

    (4,895 )   1,717     2,209     (1,435 )   2,462     863     2,210  

Minority interest income, net of tax

        1,001                      
                               

Income (loss) from continuing operations

    42,364     (38,895 )   39,762     37,978     32,844     13,486     6,873  

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax(9)

    39,589     (77,341 )                    
                               

Net income (loss)

  $ 81,953   $ (116,236 ) $ 39,762   $ 37,978   $ 32,844   $ 13,486   $ 6,873  
                               

Income (loss) from continuing operations per share—basic and diluted:

                                           
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations per share

  $ 42,364   $ (38,895 ) $ 39,762   $ 37,978   $ 32,844   $ 13,486   $ 6,873  
                               

Net income (loss) per share—basic and diluted:

                                           
 

Net income (loss) per share

  $ 81,953   $ (116,236 ) $ 39,762   $ 37,978   $ 32,844   $ 13,486   $ 6,873  
                               

Weighted-average shares outstanding—basic and diluted

    1     1     1     1     1     1     1  
                               

73


Table of Contents

 

 
  As of December 31,   As of June 30,  
 
  2003(1)   2004   2005   2006   2007   2008  
 
  (dollars in thousands)
 

Balance Sheet Data

                                     

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 3,392   $ 2,750   $ 11,366   $ 19,597   $ 23,632   $ 16,507  

Accounts receivable, net

    74,779     83,609     90,780     107,618     121,754     94,717  

Inventories, net

    47,075     65,906     89,141     64,192     76,023     83,235  

Property, plant and equipment, net

    1,038,921     1,023,056     1,223,322     1,295,388     1,344,246     1,325,536  

Intangible assets, net

    265,938     232,883     186,467     137,245     94,933     66,530  

Total assets

    1,553,828     1,497,742     1,673,483     1,708,231     1,765,012     1,726,647  

Total long-term debt(6)

    785,388     777,477     823,620     812,258     720,389     731,777  

Total liabilities

    1,251,776     1,311,645     1,450,262     1,474,092     1,477,413     1,431,045  

Shareholder's equity

    300,487     186,097     223,221     234,139     287,599     295,602  

 

 
  For the Years Ended December 31,   For the Six
Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
  2003(1)   2004   2005   2006   2007   2007   2008  
 
  (dollars in thousands)
 

Other Data

                                           
 

EBITDA(7)

  $ 272,106   $ 70,872   $ 247,480   $ 278,776   $ 279,162   $ 129,360   $ 135,008  
 

Adjusted EBITDA(8)

                                           
 

Tons of coal produced (millions)(11)

    114.2     129.8     127.5     138.1     137.9     66.9     67.7  
 

Tons of coal purchased for resale (millions)(11)

    5.1     5.0     4.9     5.3     6.3     2.4     3.0  
 

Tons of coal sold (millions)(10)(11)

    119.3     134.8     132.4     143.4     144.2     69.3     70.7  

(1)
Effective January 1, 2004, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Interpretation ("FIN") No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (revised December 2003)—an interpretation of ARB No. 51 ("FIN 46R"). FIN 46R. As part of our adoption of FIN 46R, we determined that the Colowyo mine was a variable interest entity and we were the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, Colowyo was consolidated with our historical consolidated financial data as of January 1, 2004 and for all periods subsequent to January 1, 2004. Prior to the adoption of FIN No. 46(R), we were not required to consolidate the operations of the Colowyo mine, and therefore the selected consolidated financial data for the year ended December 31, 2003, does not include the operations of the Colowyo mine.

(2)
Freight revenues accounted for 2.5%, 2.5%, 4.9%, 3.9% and 4.0% of our total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and 4.0% and 5.5% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively.

(3)
Primarily reflects amortization under our brokerage contract related to the Spring Creek mine.

(4)
Includes corporate allocations of general and administrative costs from Rio Tinto and its subsidiaries of $0.9 million, $4.5 million, $8.1 million, $11.4 million and $13.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and $5.6 million and $6.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively, and allocations of Rio Tinto headquarters overhead costs of $11.0 million, $8.7 million, $7.9 million, $6.9 million and $10.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and $5.2 million and $5.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively.

74


Table of Contents

(5)
Asset impairment charges of $18.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 reflects non-recurring capitalized cost of an abandoned enterprise resource planning, or ERP, systems implementation. The ERP systems implementation was a worldwide Rio Tinto initiative designed to align processes, procedures, practices and reporting across all Rio Tinto business units. The implementation would have taken our standalone ERP system and moved it to a shared Rio Tinto platform, which could not be transferred to a new standalone company. It also would have supported certain specific Rio Tinto processes, procedures, practices and reporting which were specific to Rio Tinto. Asset impairment charges of $133.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 include an impairment of long lived assets at Colowyo of $118.1 million under SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, due to a change in expectations of the mine plan, which significantly reduced its value.

(6)
Total long-term debt includes the current and long-term portions of the long-term debt-bonds, long-term debt-related party and long-term debt-other.

(7)
EBITDA, a performance measure used by management, is defined as net income (loss) plus: interest expense (net of interest income), income tax provision, depreciation and depletion, accretion and amortization as shown in the table below. EBITDA, as presented for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007 and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, is not defined under U.S. GAAP, and does not purport to be an alternative to net income as a measure of operating performance. Because not all companies use identical calculations, this presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly-titled measures of other companies. We use, and we believe investors benefit from the presentation of, EBITDA in evaluating our operating performance because it provides us and our investors with an additional tool to compare our operating performance on a consistent basis by removing the impact of certain items that management believes do not directly reflect our core operations. We believe that EBITDA is useful to investors and other external users of our consolidated financial statements in evaluating our operating performance because EBITDA is widely used by investors to measure a company's operating performance without regard to items such as interest expense, taxes, depreciation and depletion, amortization and accretion, which can vary substantially from company to company depending upon accounting methods and book value of assets, capital structure and the method by which assets were acquired.

However, using EBITDA as a performance measure has material limitations as compared to net income, or other financial measures as defined under U.S. GAAP, as it excludes certain recurring items which may be meaningful to investors. EBITDA excludes interest expense or interest income; however, as we have historically borrowed money from our parent in order to finance transactions and operations, or invested available cash to generate interest income, interest expense and interest income are elements of our cost structure and ability to generate revenue and returns for shareholders. Further, EBITDA excludes depreciation and depletion and amortization; however, as we use capital and intangible assets to generate revenues, depreciation and depletion, as well as amortization are a necessary element of our costs and ability to generate revenue. EBITDA also excludes accretion expense; however, as we are legally obligated to pay for costs associated with the reclamation and closure of our mine sites, the periodic accretion expense relating to these reclamation costs is a necessary element of our costs and ability to generate revenue. Finally, EBITDA excludes income taxes; however, as we are organized as a corporation, the payment of taxes is a necessary element of our operations. As a result of these exclusions from EBITDA, any measure that excludes interest expense, interest income, depreciation and depletion, accretion, amortization and income taxes has material limitations as compared to net income. When using EBITDA as a performance measure, management compensates for these limitations by comparing EBITDA to net income in each period, so as to allow for the comparison of the performance of the underlying core operations with the overall performance of the company on a full-cost, after

75


Table of Contents

 
  For the Years Ended December 31,   For the Six
Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
  2003   2004   2005   2006   2007   2007   2008  
 
  (dollars in thousands)
 

Net income (loss)

  $ 81,953   $ (116,236 ) $ 39,762   $ 37,978   $ 32,844   $ 13,486   $ 6,873  

Depreciation and depletion

    73,855     89,946     91,849     122,254     139,167     67,183     73,465  

Amortization

    50,769     53,311     45,279     44,577     42,312     16,871     28,403  

Accretion

    8,809     9,811     11,485     14,334     15,665     7,244     8,294  

Interest expense

    36,285     59,619     49,570     56,568     54,262     27,941     18,991  

Interest income

    (1,058 )   (4,252 )   (1,659 )   (3,829 )   (7,577 )   (4,408 )   (2,614 )

Income tax (benefit) provision

    21,493     (21,327 )   11,194     6,894     2,489     1,043     1,596  
                               

EBITDA

  $ 272,106   $ 70,872   $ 247,480   $ 278,776   $ 279,162   $ 129,360   $ 135,008  
                               
(8)
Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA plus:            as shown in the table below:

 
  For the Years Ended December 31,   For the Six
Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
  2003   2004   2005   2006   2007   2007   2008  
 
  (dollars in thousands)
 

EBITDA

  $ 272,106   $ 70,872   $ 247,480   $ 278,776   $ 279,162   $ 129,360   $ 135,008  

                                           

                                           

                                           

                                           
                               

Adjusted EBITDA

  $     $     $     $     $     $     $    
                               
(9)
The cumulative effect of accounting changes related to the January 1, 2003 adoption of SFAS No. 143 resulting in net income of $39.6 million (net of tax of $22.3 million) and the January 1, 2004 adoption of FIN 46R resulting in a charge of $77.3 million (net of tax of $25.5 million).

(10)
Tons of coal sold includes amounts sold under our brokerage contract related to the Spring Creek mine.

(11)
For the year ended December 31, 2003, tons of coal produced, tons of coal purchased for resale and tons of coal sold, excludes Colowyo, as it was not consolidated into our historical consolidated financial statements. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007 and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, tons of coal produced, tons of coal purchased for resale and tons of coal sold, includes Colowyo, as it was consolidated into our historical consolidated financial statements under FIN 46, as explained in Note 1 above.

76


Table of Contents


MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        You should read the following discussion together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes to those consolidated financial statements beginning on page F-1 of this prospectus. Certain information contained in this discussion and analysis and presented elsewhere in this document, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those listed in this prospectus under "Risk Factors" and "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements."

Overview

        We are the second largest producer of coal in the U.S. and in the Powder River Basin, or PRB, based on 2007 coal production. We operate some of the safest mines in the coal industry. For 2007, MSHA data for employee injuries showed our mines had the lowest employee all injury incident rate of the 5 largest U.S. coal producing companies. Following this offering, we will operate solely in the PRB, the lowest cost coal producing region of the major coal producing regions in the U.S., and operate three of the five largest coal mines in the region and in the U.S. Our operations include four wholly-owned surface coal mines, three of which are in Wyoming and one in Montana, and we own a 50% interest in another surface coal mine in Montana. We produce sub-bituminous steam coal with a low sulfur content and sell our coal primarily to electricity generating utilities.

        As of September 30, 2008, excluding the Colowyo coal mine, we controlled approximately 1.7 billion tons of coal, consisting of approximately 1.4 billion tons of proven and probable coal reserves and approximately 104 million tons of non-reserve coal deposits as of December 31, 2007, and approximately 288 million tons of non-reserve coal deposits, according to BLM estimates, that we acquired in April 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, excluding the Colowyo coal mine, we produced 132.3 million and 65.4 million tons of coal, respectively, and sold 138.6 million tons and 68.4 million tons, respectively.

        Our key business drivers include the following:

        In the longer term, we expect that our costs per ton may rise as our mines progress into naturally deepening coal seams. We expect that this trend would similarly be experienced by other operators in the PRB. In addition, LBAs have become increasingly more competitive and expensive to obtain, resulting in higher depletion expense as we increase our mining activities at more recently acquired LBAs.

Background

        In 2005, our volume of coal shipments was impacted by severe heavy rain, which reduced the capacity of the railroads by which our customers contract to transport coal from our mines. This disruption lasted from May to December of 2005, significantly depleting the PRB coal inventories held by our customers. At the start of 2006, the railroads returned to full capacity and demand for our coal increased as utilities sought to rebuild their depleted inventories. We, and other PRB coal producers, increased our 2006 production in order to meet this demand. We took advantage of recently installed capacity expansions at our mines and also supplemented our workforce by hiring additional contractors, which increased our costs. In 2007, as customers' inventories normalized, demand for our coal stabilized and we focused on controlling costs, including reducing the number of contractors.

77


Table of Contents


Nonetheless, prices increased for many of our supplies, such as diesel fuel and steel. Because we sell our coal primarily under long-term contracts and the majority of our prices are therefore fixed as we start each year, we experienced a limited immediate benefit from the increased spot prices in 2006. However, as long-term contracts from earlier years expired, they have been replaced by contracts signed during periods of higher prices and consequently we have realized higher prices per ton since 2005. In 2008, the supply and demand balance for PRB coal has been and continues to be strong, increasing prices for our coal and enabling us to enter into long-term contracts at higher prices.

Basis of Presentation

        Upon the completion of this offering, we will own the western U.S. coal business (other than the Colowyo mine in Colorado) of Rio Tinto America. Rio Tinto Energy America Inc., or RTEA, is considered to be our predecessor for accounting purposes and its consolidated financial statements became our historical consolidated financial statements. The information discussed below primarily relates to the consolidated historical results of RTEA (which includes Colowyo) and may not necessarily reflect what our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows will be in the future or would have been as a stand-alone company during the periods presented. Our capital structure will be changed significantly upon our completion of this offering and we will enter into certain ongoing transition arrangements with an affiliate of Rio Tinto America. We encourage you to read our "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information" and "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements" provided within this prospectus to better understand how our results could potentially be affected by our separation from Rio Tinto America and the execution of the various agreements governing our relationship as a stand-alone company with Rio Tinto America and its affiliates.

Excluded Businesses

        Our historical consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the Colowyo mine, a coal mine in Colorado, as well as the uranium mining venture which is not currently operating, or the uranium property. These entities will not be part of our company after completion of this offering. Consequently, the discussion of our results of operations below includes a discussion of the financial results reported in our historical consolidated financial statements that include the Colowyo mine and the uranium property, but any forward-looking statements exclude the results of the Colowyo mine and the uranium property. The Colowyo mine accounted for 8.9% and 6.6% of our total revenues in 2007 and the first half of 2008, respectively. Due to the terms, conditions and other restrictions contained in the existing financing arrangements with respect to the Colowyo mine, the Colowyo mine will not be transferred to Cloud Peak Energy in connection with this offering. The results of the uranium property were not material.

Decker Mine

        We hold a 50% interest in the Decker mine in Montana through a joint-venture agreement. Under the terms of our joint-venture agreement, a third-party mine operator manages the operations of the Decker mine. We account for our pro-rata share of assets and liabilities in our undivided interest in the joint venture using the proportionate consolidation method, whereby our share of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses are included in the appropriate classification in our consolidated financial statements.

Revenues

        Substantially all of our historical revenues comprise sales of coal from our coal mines (including Colowyo) and from our 50% interest in the Decker coal mine. Coal produced from these mines accounted for 85.4% and 85.3% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. Coal produced from the Colowyo mine accounted for 8.9%

78


Table of Contents


and 6.7% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. Remaining coal and other revenues are primarily comprised of (i) purchases and re-sales of coal, known as "broker" coal sales or purchases; and (ii) freight charged to customers. Substantially all of our customers contract directly with the third party railroad operators to transport coal purchased from us, but in limited circumstances we arrange freight.

        Our revenues depend on the price at which we are able to sell our coal. As we make most of our coal sales under contracts with a term of one to five years, the price of coal at the time we enter into the contracts determines the price we receive when we deliver the coal under the contracts. Spot prices for PRB coal have more than doubled from $6.15 to $14.65 per ton for 8,800 Btu coal from January 2005 to September 2008. However, prices in September 2008 are down from a high of $15.75 in June 2008.

        The current strong coal pricing environment has contributed to the growth in our revenues, but there is uncertainty as to whether, and for how long, this strong coal pricing environment will continue. The global supply and demand balance for coal as well as the overall increase in prices for energy-based commodities, such as natural gas and crude oil, has resulted in rising prices for the coal we produce. In recent years, the U.S. coal market has been characterized by increasing prices with significant volatility. We believe that recent high prices for the coal we produce are the result of many factors including:

        These current trends may be offset in the future as a result of changes in regulatory and environmental standards (particularly with respect to air emission standards), which may reduce the demand for, or increase the costs of using, our coal, as well as declines in the demand dynamics described above. See "Risk Factors" and "The Coal Industry."

        We sell coal primarily to electricity generating utilities and industrial customers in the U.S.

        We sell most of our coal under long-term contracts having a term of one year or greater, supplemented by short-term contracts having a term of less than one year. We have agreed to sell all of our estimated production for 2008. As of June 30, 2008, we had agreed to sell approximately 91% of our estimated 2009 production (excluding the Colowyo mine) and approximately 70% of our estimated 2010 production (excluding the Colowyo mine). See "Business—Customers and Coal Contracts" for a description of the terms of our long-term coal supply contracts.

79


Table of Contents

        We have one significant broker sales contract under which Spring Creek has agreed to sell purchased coal to a wholesale power generation company. In 1978, Spring Creek Coal Company entered into a long-term coal sale contract to underpin the establishment of the Spring Creek coal mine. When we acquired the Spring Creek coal mine in 1993, the contract had been amended allowing Spring Creek to supply approximately 6.8 million tons of coal per year from long-term purchase contracts entered into with two separate mines, one of which we subsequently acquired in 1998 (the Jacobs Ranch coal mine). Due to the nature of the broker sales contract and the market conditions at the time Spring Creek executed the purchase contracts, our selling price for the coal is higher than our purchase price.

        In 2007, this broker sales contract contributed $116.6 million of revenues and $38.3 million of income before tax after an amortization charge for the related contract rights of $34.2 million. Final deliveries are expected to be made under the contract in the first quarter of 2010, at which time we expect the contract to expire and the intangible asset to be fully amortized.

Cost of Product Sold

        The largest component of cost of product sold is royalties and production taxes incurred in selling the coal we produce. Royalties and production taxes are comprised of federal and state royalties and approximately seven other federal, state and county taxes. A substantial portion of our royalties and taxes are levied as a percentage of gross revenues, with the remaining levied on a per ton basis. Because such a large portion of our royalties and production taxes are levied on a percentage of gross revenues, as our revenues increase, our royalty and production tax expenses similarly increase. In 2007, we incurred royalties and production taxes which represented 29.0% of revenues from coal we produced and 32.5% of our cost of product sold (including Colowyo).

        Cost of product sold is sensitive to changes in diesel fuel prices. Since December 31, 2007, our weighted average price for diesel fuel increased from $2.57 per gallon in December 2007 to $3.62 per gallon in September 2008. Diesel fuel and lubricant expenses represented 10.4% of our cost of product sold for the year ended December 31, 2007 and 12.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Other major elements of cost of product sold include labor costs for our employees, repair and maintenance expenditures and external contractors. In line with the worldwide mining industry, we are experiencing increased operating costs for mining equipment, diesel fuel and supplies and employee wages and salaries. Other costs include purchases of coal for re-sale, tires, power, and other consumables.

        The chart below shows the major components of our cost of product sold for the year ended December 31, 2007 (including Colowyo):

GRAPHIC

80


Table of Contents

Depreciation and Depletion

        We depreciate our plant and equipment on a straight line basis over its useful life or on a units of production basis. We also incur depletion charges as we mine coal from purchased coal leases. We acquire the right to mine coal from the Bureau of Land Management, or BLM, under the Lease by Application process, or LBA. See "Business—Reserve Acquisition Process." We pay the BLM in five annual installments to acquire the coal lease. We recognize this asset on our balance sheet in property plant and equipment, and recognize depletion charges in the income statement based on the tons of coal mined from the coal lease each year. LBAs are becoming increasingly more competitive and expensive to obtain, resulting in higher depletion expense as we increase our mining activities at more recently acquired LBAs.

Amortization

        We amortize acquired contract rights. The primary contract right held on our balance sheet relates to Spring Creek, which is explained above. The intangible contract right asset is amortized as deliveries are made. Final deliveries are expected to be made under the contract in the first quarter of 2010, at which time we expect the contract to expire and the intangible asset to be fully amortized.

Accretion

        We have an obligation to complete final reclamation and mine closure activities, including earthwork, revegetation and demolition, which will be performed when our mines eventually exhaust their reserves and close. We record this future liability based on the net present value of the estimated costs to perform the work. Each year we get closer to the end of the mine life and hence the net present value of the liability increases. We record this increase in the liability, and any changes in the estimates calculating the liability, as accretion expense.

Exploration Costs

        We incur exploration costs to survey, map, drill and evaluate deposits surrounding our mining areas. Exploration costs include personnel costs of those employees directly involved in exploration activities. Exploration costs are expensed as incurred.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

        Our historical selling, general and administrative expenses comprise the costs of our marketing group based in Denver, and the selling, general and administrative type expenses incurred in our corporate headquarters in Gillette. This category also includes corporate allocations of general and administrative expenses. The Rio Tinto Group has historically provided various services and other general corporate support to the Company, including, tax, treasury, corporate secretary, procurement, information systems and technology, human resources, accounting services and insurance/risk management in the ordinary course of business under preexisting contractual arrangements. We were charged for services provided under the preexisting contractual arrangements on a unit cost or cost allocation basis, such as per invoice processed, proportion of information technology users, share of time, calculated on a combination of factors, including percentage of operating expenditures, head count and revenues.

        In addition, we were allocated Rio Tinto headquarters overhead costs including technology and innovation, board, community and external relations, investor relations, human resources and the Energy Product Group. The allocations were based on a percentage of operating expenses or revenues.

        Included within selling, general and administrative costs for the year ended December 31, 2007 is our share of corporate allocation and shared administrative costs of $23.6 million.

81


Table of Contents

        In addition, our carve-out historical consolidated financial statements include allocations of corporate, general and administrative expenses and Rio Tinto headquarters overhead expenses. Many of the allocations of corporate, general administrative expenses relate to services provided to us under the shared services agreement with an affiliate of Rio Tinto America, which will continue for a transition period of approximately nine months under a Transition Services Agreement (see "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements"). The allocations of Rio Tinto headquarters overhead costs will not continue when we are a stand-alone public company. However, we will incur additional costs for financial reporting and compliance, corporate governance, treasury and investor relations activities, which includes additional compensation to current and future employees and professional fees to external service providers, that are in addition to our historical costs. Based on our preliminary analysis, we estimate that our annual general and administrative expenses as a stand-alone public company will exceed the general and administrative expenses reported in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007, by approximately $         million to $         million. This amount is preliminary and the actual amount incurred may be materially different. However, no pro forma adjustments have been made for these additional expenses in our "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations," as an estimate is not objectively determinable and factually supportable.

Interest Expense

        Our historical interest expense relates to our historical credit facility with Rio Tinto America, or the RTA facility; interest expense on the bonds issued by the Colowyo coal mine; and to a lesser extent, interest imputed on our annual installment payments due under our LBA acquisitions; and fees for letters of credit and surety bonds used to guarantee our reclamation and other obligations. The RTA facility had an interest rate which was variable and which, as of June 30, 2008, was 4.27% compared to 6.50% as of December 31, 2007. We had outstanding borrowings under the RTA facility of $500.6 million as of December 31, 2007. The debt owed under the RTA facility was contributed to the capital of RTEA on September 24, 2008. See "—Liquidity and Capital Resources After This Offering" below. We will no longer incur interest expense on the Colowyo bonds as Colowyo will not be transferred to Cloud Peak Energy in connection with this offering.

Income Tax

        The provision for income taxes is determined using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated based upon the temporary differences between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using currently enacted rates. We are a member of a consolidated federal tax group. However, for the purposes of the accompanying consolidated financial statements, which are prepared on a carve-out basis, the Company's current and deferred benefit (provision) was calculated on a stand-alone basis. Historical changes in the amount of the depletion deductions, relative to respective changes in income before income tax provision and earnings from unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax, have been the primary drivers of changes to our effective tax rate. Percentage depletion on a mine by mine basis can vary from year to year because of net income from mining and other limitations. Future differences in our income before income tax provision and earnings from unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax, and taxable income from mining activities are expected to cause changes to our effective tax rate as compared to our prior years. Because our prior tax positions have been managed for the benefit of Rio Tinto's entire consolidated federal tax group, the tax strategies used were not necessarily reflective of tax strategies we would have followed or will follow, as a stand-alone company. As a result, our effective tax rate as a stand-alone entity may differ significantly from those in historical periods.

Balance Sheet Overview

        As of December 31, 2007, our total assets were $1.77 billion. Included in our total assets as of December 31, 2007 was $92.4 million, being Colowyo's total assets.

82


Table of Contents

        Our primary asset is property, plant and equipment, which includes our coal reserves. Other significant asset categories include accounts receivable; intangible assets, which include contract rights; and supplies and inventories, which include parts, supplies and coal inventories.

        The largest component of our liabilities structure was long-term debt owed to Rio Tinto America under the RTA facility. The debt owed under the RTA facility was contributed to the capital of RTEA on September 24, 2008. Other liabilities include asset retirement obligations which comprise expected costs associated with mine reclamation and closure activities, the bond debt used to finance the Colowyo acquisition, and obligations for future LBA installment payments. Any outstanding short-term intercompany obligations will be contributed to the capital of RTEA immediately prior to this offering.

Results of Operations

        The following table presents our operating results for the three years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007; and the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 (in millions):

 
  Year Ended December 31,   Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
 
  2005   2006   2007   2007   2008  

Revenues

  $ 1,179.6   $ 1,424.2   $ 1,558.7   $ 726.7   $ 845.1  

Costs and expenses

                               
 

Cost of product sold

    878.8     1,081.1     1,191.8     567.7     670.7  
 

Depreciation and depletion

    91.8     122.3     139.2     67.2     73.4  
 

Amortization

    45.3     44.6     42.3     16.9     28.4  
 

Accretion

    11.5     14.3     15.6     7.2     8.3  
 

Exploration costs

    7.1     5.9     10.1     2.9     1.4  
 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

    48.1     56.9     61.9     27.7     40.0  
 

Asset impairment charges

            18.3          
                       

Total costs and expenses

    1,082.6     1,325.1     1,479.2     689.6     822.2  
                       

Operating income

   
97.0
   
99.1
   
79.5
   
37.1
   
22.9
 

Other income (expense)

                               
 

Interest income

    1.7     3.8     7.6     4.4     2.6  
 

Interest expense

    (49.6 )   (56.5 )   (54.3 )   (27.9 )   (19.0 )
 

Other, net

    (0.2 )   (0.1 )   0.1         (0.2 )
                       

Total other expense

    (48.2 )   (52.8 )   (46.6 )   (23.5 )   (16.6 )
                       

Income before income tax provision and earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates

   
48.8
   
46.3
   
32.9
   
13.6
   
6.3
 
 

Income tax provision

    (11.2 )   (6.9 )   (2.5 )   (1.0 )   (1.6 )
 

Earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

    2.2     (1.4 )   2.4     0.9     2.2  
                       

Net income

  $ 39.8   $ 38.0   $ 32.8   $ 13.5   $ 6.9  
                       

Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2007

Revenues

        Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were $845.1 million, or $118.4 million greater than revenues of $726.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, a 16.3% increase. This increase in revenues was driven by a 14.0% increase in the revenue per ton of coal sold compared to the first six months of 2007 and the sale of 70.7 million tons of coal in the six months ended June 30,

83


Table of Contents


2008, a 2.0% increase from the same period of 2007. The growth in revenue per ton sold and tonnage sales reflects the continuing strong demand for PRB coal due to prevailing economic and industry conditions at the time we entered into our coal supply contracts. Included in our revenues are $55.4 million and $70.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, which are attributable to the Colowyo mine, and represented 6.6% and 9.6% of our consolidated revenues for those periods, respectively.

Cost of Product Sold

        Cost of product sold was $670.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $567.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, a $103.0 million, or 18.1% increase. The cost of product sold was 79.4% and 78.1% of revenues for those same periods.

        Royalties and production taxes increased by approximately 12.2% for the first six months of 2008 compared to the 2007 period and are largely a function of our increased revenues over the same period. While royalties and production taxes generally increase at a consistent rate with revenues, production taxes increased by 10.3% for the first six months of 2008 compared to the 2007 period compared to a 16.3% increase in revenue due to a decrease in the federal reclamation fee in the fourth quarter of 2007. The increase in our cost of product sold was also driven by a 49.4% increase in fuel and lubricant costs as a result of the recent increases in the cost of petroleum-based products and increased usage of diesel fuel as a result of our increased mining activity. In addition, freight costs increased 54.5%, primarily due to an increase in tonnage sold where we pay freight and subsequently invoice the freight charges to the customers. Included in our consolidated cost of product sold for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 is $63.8 million and $55.1 million, respectively, related to the Colowyo mine sales.

Depreciation and Depletion

        Depreciation and depletion expense was $73.4 million and $67.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. $3.2 million of the increase is attributable to increased depreciation resulting from recent purchases of mining equipment and $3.0 million is attributable to our increased mining activities, primarily from more recently acquired, higher cost coal reserves, thereby resulting in higher depletion costs.

Amortization

        Amortization expense was $28.4 million and $16.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The $11.5 million increase is attributable to the buy out of a long-term contract at the Decker mine in the first quarter of 2008, which, by effectively accelerating deliveries under the contract, resulted in accelerated amortization of the intangible asset associated with the contract.

Accretion

        Accretion expense was $8.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and $7.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase was primarily attributable to revised estimates of the future costs of our closure obligations as a result of recent increases in costs associated with fulfilling these obligations.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

        Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $12.3 million, or 44.4%, to $40.0 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to $27.7 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2007. The increase is primarily attributable to $10.2 million of legal, accounting and other costs incurred in the six months ended June 30, 2008 associated with the preparation for this offering.

84


Table of Contents

Other Income (Expense)

        Interest income, which represents the interest earned on short-term investments made through a Rio Tinto America cash management program, decreased from $4.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 to $2.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 as a result of a decrease of $11.8 million in average invested funds and a 2.3% decrease in the average rate earned.

        Interest expense, the largest component of which is our variable rate debt with Rio Tinto America, declined from $27.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 to $19.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease primarily resulted from a $67.5 million decrease in the average borrowings under the RTA facility and a 2.3% decrease in the average interest rate incurred on our RTA facility borrowings.

        Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 includes $7.3 million and $7.2 million, respectively, attributable to the Colowyo mine.

Income Tax Benefit (Provision)

        Income tax expense increased to $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase was due to an increase in the effective income tax rate from 7.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 to 25.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 due to the benefit of a larger excess tax depletion deduction in 2007, partially offset by a decrease in income before income taxes and earnings from unconsolidated affiliates. Percentage depletion in excess of basis (the permanent portion) for 2008 is expected to be less than percentage depletion in excess of basis in 2007, in part due to the net income limitation on depletion at certain of our mines. For the year ended December 31, 2008, it is anticipated that this limitation will reduce the amount of the depletion deduction relative to the amount of depletion deducted in 2007. This has resulted in an increase in our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007.

Net Income

        As a result of the factors discussed above, net income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $6.9 million compared to net income of $13.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007.

Year Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2006

        Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 were $1.56 billion or 9.9% greater than revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 of $1.42 billion. Of the 9.9% increase in revenues, 8.8% was due to an increase in the average revenues per ton of coal and the remainder was due to an increase in the volume of tons sold. Increased revenues per ton for our coal in 2007 as compared to 2006 continued to be driven by growing demand for PRB coal at the time our long term sales contracts were executed. Tons of coal sold of 143.4 million tons for the year ended December 31, 2006 increased to 144.2 million tons in 2007. Revenues for the Colowyo mine were $138.9 million and $158.6 million in the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, or 8.9% and 11.2%, of our 2007 and 2006 total revenues, respectively, which is included in the foregoing numbers.

        Cost of product sold increased by 10.2% from $1.08 billion for the year ended December 31, 2006 to $1.19 billion for the year ended December 31, 2007. Our cost of product sold was 76.5% and 75.9% of revenues for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

85


Table of Contents

        Increases in royalties and production taxes, freight, fuel and lubricants and repair parts and supplies accounted for substantially all of the increase in cost of product sold from 2006 to 2007. Royalties and production taxes, which are largely a function of our increased revenues, increased by approximately 9.1% in 2007 compared to 2006, which is in line with our 9.9% revenues increase from 2006 compared to 2007. The freight component of our cost of product sold increased by 76.9% from 2006 to 2007, as we increased the percentage of tons sold where we arranged transportation on behalf of our customers from 1.4% to 2.2%, respectively. The cost of fuel and lubricants increased 14.9%, of which 62% was attributable to diesel market price increases and the balance was primarily attributable to increased overburden removal as coal seams naturally deepened. Repairs and supplies increased 18.6% over 2006 due to a combination of increasing costs for components, driven by rising steel prices, and increased overburden removal. Offsetting these increases was a decrease in 2007 from 2006 for external contractors of 18.3%. In 2007, we reduced the level of external contractors that were needed in 2006 when we increased production significantly to replace the weather-related production disruption which occurred in 2005. Cost of product sold includes $113.4 million and $119.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, related to the Colowyo mine.

        Depreciation and depletion increased by 13.8% from $122.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 to $139.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase was attributable to increased production from more recently acquired, higher cost coal deposits, resulting in a higher depletion cost; and a higher capital base following increased investment and capital expenditures in recent years resulting in higher depreciation.

        Contract amortization expense was $42.3 million and $44.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

        Accretion expense was $15.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $14.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase was primarily attributable to revised estimates of future costs of our closure obligations, following expansion of mining areas and increases in key cost drivers such as the price of diesel fuel and the cost of heavy mining equipment.

        Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by 8.8% from $56.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 to $61.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase was primarily attributable to increases in costs allocated to us by Rio Tinto of $5.3 million.

        For the year ended December 31, 2007, we recorded asset impairment charges of $18.3 million for capitalized costs relating to Rio Tinto's implementation of a new, company-wide integrated information system. We wrote off our costs related to this implementation when we determined that we were unable to continue to develop the system as a stand-alone company. We recorded no comparable impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2006.

86


Table of Contents

        Interest income, which represents the interest income earned on short-term investments made through a Rio Tinto America cash management program, increased from $3.8 million in 2006 to $7.6 million 2007, as the average amount invested through this program increased by $49.5 million in 2007 compared to 2006.

        Interest expense on our debt declined from $56.5 million in 2006 to $54.3 million in 2007 due principally to lower LBA balances which were entered into in prior years.

        Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 includes $14.6 million and $15.0 million, respectively, attributable to the Colowyo coal mine.

        The effective income tax rate in 2007 was 7.6% compared to 14.9% for the year ended December 31, 2006. The decrease was primarily attributable to a larger excess tax depletion deduction in 2007 compared to 2006. Percentage depletion in excess of basis (the permanent portion) for 2007 was greater than percentage depletion in excess of basis in 2006, in part due to the net income at certain of our mines. Further, the relationship of permanent percentage depletion as compared to book income results in a more significant decrease in the effective rate for 2007 as compared to 2006.

        We recorded an other than temporary impairment of $5.0 million ($3.2 million, net of tax) related to an equity method investment for the year ended December 31, 2006 and, primarily as a result of this charge, earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax was $(1.4) million for the year ended 2006 compared to $2.4 million for the year ended 2007.

        As a result of the factors discussed above net income for 2007 was $32.8 million compared to $38.0 million in 2006.

Year Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2005

        Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 were $1.42 billion, or 20.3% greater than revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005 of $1.18 billion. Of the increase, 11.3% was due to an increase in the price per ton of coal sold and 8.4% was due to an increase in the volume of coal sold. Shipments increased from 132.4 million tons in 2005 to 143.4 million tons in 2006. The increases in 2006 compared to 2005 in terms of both tons shipped and revenues per ton sold were attributable to electric utilities rebuilding depleted coal inventories as a result of weather-related rail delivery disruptions which began in May 2005 and lasted throughout the second half of 2005. Despite the year-over-year increase in revenues per ton of coal sold, market prices for coal declined in the second half of 2006 as the rebuilding of the customers' coal inventories was substantially completed, natural gas prices declined and weather remained mild, which reduced demand for coal-fired electricity generation. Revenues from the Colowyo mine were $158.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and $122.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, or 11.2% and 10.4% of total revenues, respectively.

87


Table of Contents

        Cost of product sold increased to $1.08 billion for the year ended December 31, 2006, or 22.9%, over the cost of product sold for the year ended December 31, 2005 of $878.8 million. Our cost of product sold was 76.1% of revenues in 2006 compared to 74.5% of our revenues in 2005.

        Royalties and production taxes increased 19.6%, in line with the 20.3% increase in revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to 2005. The labor component of the cost of product sold increased by 30.2% from 2005, primarily due to increased production volumes in 2006 and an adjustment in our hourly labor rates to re-align them with then current market rates. Fuel and lubricant component costs increased by 40.4% primarily caused by the rise in worldwide crude oil prices, an increase in overburden removal and increased production. Repair parts and supplies increased 21.8% in line with increasing steel prices and higher contractor rates due to tight supply and high demand for skilled labor. The cost of explosives increased by 29.6% in 2006 from 2005 as a result of increased mining activity and increases in the costs of natural gas products, to which the cost of explosives is closely tied. External contract labor expenses increased by 14.4% in 2006 from 2005 due to the expanded utilization of contracted service providers to facilitate our efforts to increase production to meet increased demand. Included in our cost of product sold for 2006 and 2005 is $119.7 million and $90.3 million, respectively, from the Colowyo mine sales.

        Depreciation and depletion increased to $122.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, or 33.2%, from $91.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. We made significant capital expenditures in recent years for property, plant and equipment, resulting in increased depreciation charges. Production increased from recently acquired, higher cost coal deposits, resulting in a higher depletion cost.

        Contract amortization expense was $44.6 million and $45.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

        Accretion expense was $14.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $11.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The increase was primarily attributable to revised estimates of the future costs of our closure obligations, following expansion of mining areas and increases in key cost drivers such as the price of diesel fuel and the cost of heavy mining equipment.

        Selling, general and administrative costs increased from $48.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 by $8.8 million, or 18.3%, to $56.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase was primarily due to $1.6 million of higher consultant costs, $1.7 million of higher employee compensation costs following a compensation review to re-align with then current market rates and $1.5 million for the rebranding of the company to RTEA.

        Interest income increased from $1.7 million in 2005 to $3.8 million in 2006 as the average amount invested through this program in 2006 increased by $20.9 million from 2005.

        Interest expense increased from $49.6 million in 2005 to $56.5 million in 2006 primarily due to higher average balances outstanding on our Rio Tinto America debt at a higher rate than 2005.

88


Table of Contents

        Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 includes $15.0 million and $15.4 million, respectively, attributable to the Colowyo mine.

        Our effective tax rate was 14.9% and 23.0% for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The decrease is primarily attributable to an increase, relative to pretax income, in the benefit arising from the difference between the book and tax basis on a joint venture that was disposed of for the year ended December 31, 2006, which did not occur for the year ended December 31, 2005.

        We recorded an other than temporary impairment of $5.0 million ($3.2 million, net of tax) related to an equity method investment for the year ended December 31, 2006 and, primarily as a result of this charge, earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax, was $(1.4) million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.

        As a result of the factors discussed above net income for 2006 was $38.0 million compared to $39.8 million in 2005.

Liquidity and Capital Resources Prior to this Offering

        Historically, our primary source of liquidity has been cash from sales of our coal production to customers and borrowings from Rio Tinto America. In addition, the acquisition of the Colowyo mine was financed by the issue of bonds. These bond liabilities will not be transferred to Cloud Peak Energy in connection with this offering. Our primary uses of cash include our production costs, capital expenditures and principal and interest payments.

        Total cash on hand as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and June 30, 2008 was $25.7 million, $25.5 million and $17.5 million, respectively. These are primarily balances held by the Decker mine, which we do not manage. Also included in cash was $2.1 million, $5.9 million and $1.0 million of restricted cash as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and June 30, 2008, respectively, which are required to be set aside to fund payments in respect of the Colowyo bond obligations. Other than Decker and Colowyo restricted cash, our cash balances are included in Rio Tinto America treasury overnight cash sweep arrangements. The balance of cash invested in these sweep arrangements was $82.7 million, $105.6 million and $0.3 million as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and June 30, 2008, respectively.

        Net cash provided by operating activities was $19.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $137.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Contributing to the $117.9 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities was largely a result of a $130.3 million payment to related parties for overhead costs, offset, in part, by a $22.2 million increase in accounts receivable.

        Net cash provided by operating activities increased from $304.1 for the year ended December 31, 2006 to $320.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Increased revenues contributed to the growth in operating cash flows. While net income decreased by $5.1 million this included increases in non-cash charges of an $18.3 million asset impairment charge for the abandoned systems implementation, a $16.9 million increase in depreciation and depletion reflecting significant purchases of property, plant and equipment in recent years and a $17.8 million increase in expenses paid by the Parent on the Company's behalf which were not required to be reimbursed. These increases were partially offset by a $28.2 million use of cash for decreases in amounts due to related parties and other current liabilities.

89


Table of Contents

        Net cash provided by operating activities increased from $252.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 to $304.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Increased revenues contributed to the growth in operating cash flows. While net income decreased by $1.8 million, this included increases in non-cash charges of a $30.4 million increase in depreciation and depletion reflecting significant purchases of property, plant and equipment in recent years, and a $9.9 million increase in interest expense converted to principal as interest expense increased in 2006 from higher average balances on the related party long-term debt.

        Net cash used in investing activities increased from $16.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 to $24.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The $7.7 million increase in cash used in investing activities is the result of a $11.1 million increase in purchases of property, plant and equipment and $53.2 million of refundable deposits for reserve acquisitions, $50.2 million of which related to our Cordero Rojo mine. See Note 8 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. Offsetting these uses of cash was the receipt of a $24.4 million refundable deposit related to an unsuccessful coal reserve acquisition bid and a $31.1 million decrease in advances to affiliates. In April 2008, we entered into an agreement to purchase land pursuant to which the seller may require us to pay a purchase price of $23.7 million between April 2013 and April 2018. In addition, on August 1, 2008, we were awarded the $250.8 million lease for the South Maysdorf LBA tract, adjacent to our Cordero Rojo mine, of which we paid $50 million on April 22, 2008.

        Net cash used in investing activities was $163.5 million in 2007 compared to $250.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The primary reasons for the decrease in net cash used in investing activities was the high level of capital expenditure for the year ended December 31, 2006 on specific projects which were not repeated in 2007 and a decrease in the cash invested with Rio Tinto America treasury, on an overnight sweep.

        Net cash used in investing activities increased to $250.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $154.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 primarily due to increases in our purchases of property, plant and equipment compared to the prior year for specific projects in 2006 and an increase in the amount of cash invested with Rio Tinto America treasury.

        Net cash used in financing activities decreased from $118.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 to $2.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. This $116.2 million reduction in cash used in financing activities is primarily the result of a $77.2 million decrease in repayments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations and a $40.0 million increase in our borrowings through the RTA facility.

        Net cash used in financing activities increased to $153.3 million in 2007 from $45.5 million in 2006. This increase primarily related to payments on the RTA facility of $116.4 million during 2007 compared to a borrowing under the facility in 2006 of $55.2 million. The 2006 period also included a $75.9 million LBA payment which did not recur in 2007.

        Net cash used in financing activities decreased from $89.7 million in 2005 to $45.5 million in 2006. The decrease is primarily due to the borrowing under the RTA facility of $55.2 million in 2006.

Liquidity and Capital Resources After this Offering

        After this offering, we expect our primary source of liquidity to be cash from sales of our coal production to customers, borrowings from banks under our revolving line of credit or other future debt and the issuances of debt or equity securities in the capital markets. We will use the proceeds of our debt offering, in whole or in part, to pay Rio Tinto America as consideration for the stock of RTEA and RTEASC as described in "Separation Transactions and Related Arrangements." Therefore, we will need to obtain additional funding to the extent that we need to supplement cash generated from operations and our revolving line of credit to pay for acquisitions of mining leases, land rights, reserves

90


Table of Contents


or other assets or businesses and capital expenditures. In addition, our Series A Preferred Stock will pay on a cumulative basis when, as and if declared by our board of directors, dividends at a rate of            % of the liquidation preference of $50 per share, payable quarterly in arrears in cash, shares of our common stock or a combination thereof at our election when declared by our board of directors.

        We intend to seek to increase our reserve position by acquiring federal coal and surface rights adjoining our current operations in Wyoming and Montana. We are well-positioned to make these acquisitions due to the availability of unleased coal adjacent to our mines. We have also nominated as LBAs tracts of land that we believe contain, as applied for, approximately 1.8 billion tons of non-reserve coal deposits, according to our estimates and subject to final determination by the BLM of the final boundaries and tonnage for these LBA tracts to be bid over the next three years. We will continue to explore additional opportunities to increase our reserve base. In addition, our capital expenditure plans include our estimates of expenditures necessary to develop new LBAs, including the addition of sufficient fleets of heavy mining equipment needed to mine the coal. Our capital expenditure plans also include our estimates of the necessary expenditures to keep our current fleets updated to maintain our mining productivity and competitive position. We intend to use cash generated from operations to fund future acquisitions of reserves and capital expenditures, and, if needed, we intend to utilize our borrowing capacity or issue debt or equity securities. We do not expect to receive additional funding from Rio Tinto America in the future. Cash flows generated are dependent on a number of factors beyond our control, such as the market price for our coal, and the market price we pay for costs such as diesel and other expenses of our business. If our cash flows are lower than expected we may not be able to pursue certain capital expenditures that we had planned.

        We intend to enter into a credit agreement with one or more lenders at or around the time of this offering and/or other financing transactions. We anticipate having $             million in term debt outstanding, up to         million available under a revolving credit facility and $             million in senior notes. We will also enter into letters of credit and bonding facilities. The net cash proceeds from this third-party debt incurred at the time of closing of this offering will be paid to Rio Tinto America as consideration for the stock of RTEA and RTEASC as described in "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements."

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

        In the normal course of business, we are party to a number of off-balance sheet arrangements. These arrangements include letters of credit typically provided by a bank; and surety bonds, typically provided by an insurance company. Federal and state laws require us to secure the performance of certain long-term obligations, such as mine closure or reclamation costs and federal and state workers' compensation costs, including black lung. Certain business transactions, such as coal leases and other obligations, may also require bonding. These bonds are typically renewable annually.

        Liabilities related to these arrangements are not reflected in our consolidated balance sheets. We use a combination of surety bonds (including our obligations with respect to the Decker mine) and letters of credit to secure our off-balance sheet financial obligations, such as reclamation, coal lease obligations as well as certain exploration and black lung liabilities. While we were a part of the Rio Tinto Group, Rio Tinto typically served as guarantor of our surety bonds. Our letters of credit were generally issued under Rio Tinto's pre-existing credit facilities on our behalf, though we have in some instances entered into separate letter of credit arrangements with banks, such as arrangements with

91


Table of Contents


respect to the reclamation obligations of the Decker mine. As of December 31, 2007, the outstanding obligations were as follows (in millions):

 
  Surety
Bonds
  Letters of
Credit
  Total  

Reclamation obligations(1)

  $ 386.2   $ 327.6   $ 713.8  

Lease obligations(2)

    7.2         7.2  

Other obligations(3)

    2.0     0.5     2.5  
               

  $ 395.4   $ 328.1   $ 723.5  
               

        Because we are required by state and federal law to have these bonds or letters of credit in place before mining can commence, or continue, our failure to maintain surety bonds, letters of credit or other guarantees or security arrangements would materially and adversely affect our ability to mine or lease coal. That failure could result from a variety of factors including lack of availability, our lack of affiliation with the Rio Tinto Group, higher expense or unfavorable market terms, the exercise by third-party surety bond issuers of their right to refuse to renew the surety and restrictions on availability of collateral for current and future third-party surety bond issuers under the terms of any credit facility then in place.

        We do not currently anticipate any material adverse impact on operations, financial condition or cash flows as a result of these off-balance sheet arrangements. See Note 5 and Note 13 to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Contractual Obligations

        As of December 31, 2007, we had the following contractual obligations (in millions):

 
  Total   2008   2009 -
2010
  2011 -
2012
  2013 and
Thereafter
 

Long-term debt—related party(1)(2)

  $ 500.6   $   $ 500.6   $   $  

Long-term debt—bonds(4)

    140.0     7.9     20.6     28.1     83.4  

Long-term debt—other

    79.8     34.7     38.9     6.2      

Operating lease obligations

    9.7     0.6     1.0     1.0     7.1  

Coal purchase obligations(3)

    101.7     46.1     55.6          

Capital expenditure obligations

    50.1     50.1              
                       
 

Total

  $ 881.9   $ 139.4   $ 616.7   $ 35.3   $ 90.5  
                       

(1)
In connection with this offering, we expect to enter into $             million in senior notes, a $         million term loan and $         million revolving credit facility.

(2)
Included in long-term debt is $500.6 million that was due to Rio Tinto America under our RTA facility. The debt owed under the RTA facility was contributed to the capital of RTEA on

92


Table of Contents

(3)
As of December 31, 2007, the Company had outstanding coal purchase commitments of $101.7 million for coal purchases which are not included on the consolidated balance sheet.

(4)
Included in long term debt is $140.0 million of bonds issued by Colowyo in 1994 in two simultaneous tranches. The first tranche of the original principal amount of $92.8 million bears interest at 9.56% and matures in November 2011. The second tranche of the original principal amount of $100.0 million bears interest at 10.19% and matures in November 2016.

        This table does not include our estimated asset retirement obligations. As discussed in the "Critical Accounting Policies" section below, the estimate of the net present value of our asset retirement obligations involves a number of estimates, including the timing of the payments to satisfy these obligations. The timing of payments is based on numerous factors, including projected mine closing dates. We believe that substantially all the payments required under our asset retirement obligations as of December 31, 2007 will be made subsequent to December 31, 2012. Based on our assumptions, we estimate the current net present value of our obligation is $224.9 million. See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. This table also does not include our contractual obligations related to:

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

        We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. These accounting principles require us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, and revenues and expenses, as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our judgments, estimates and assumptions on historical information and other known factors that we deem relevant. Estimates are inherently subjective as significant management judgment is required regarding the assumptions utilized to calculate accounting estimates in our consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. This section describes those accounting policies and estimates which we believe are critical to understanding our historical consolidated financial statements and which we additionally believe will be critical to understanding our consolidated financial statements subsequent to this offering.

Revenue Recognition

        Revenues from coal sales are recognized when a customer takes delivery of our coal, which usually occurs at the time of shipment from our mine. Some coal supply agreements provide for price adjustments based on variations in quality characteristics of the coal shipped. In certain cases, a customer's analysis of the coal quality is binding and the results of the analysis are received on a delayed basis. In these cases, we estimate the amount of the quality adjustment and adjust the estimate

93


Table of Contents


to actual when the information is provided by the customer. Historically such adjustments have not been material.

Asset Retirement Obligations

        Our asset retirement obligations, or ARO, arise from the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act, or SMCRA and similar state statutes. These regulations require that we, upon closure of a mine, restore the mine property in accordance with an approved reclamation plan issued in conjunction with our mining permit.

        Our asset retirement obligations are recorded at fair value, or the amount at which we could currently settle our future reclamation obligations with informed and willing third parties. We use estimates of future third party costs to arrive at the ARO since such costs contain a profit component. We use this measure since, if we were to default on our ARO, the state or federal government would be required to hire a third party to complete the reclamation work. It has been our practice, and we anticipate it will continue to be our practice to perform a substantial portion of the reclamation work using internal resources. Hence, the ARO recorded may overstate the ARO liability if the reclamation work were performed using internal resources. Any such excess accrual will be restored to income when the ARO is satisfied.

        To determine our ARO, we calculate on a mine-by-mine basis the present value of estimated future reclamation cash flows based upon each mine's permit requirements, estimates of the acreage subject to reclamation, which is based upon approved mining plans, estimates of future reclamation costs and assumptions regarding the mine's productivity, which are based on engineering estimates which include estimates of volumes of earth and topsoil to be moved, the use of particular pieces of large mining equipment to move the earth and the running costs of those pieces of equipment. These cash flow estimates are discounted at the credit-adjusted, risk-free interest rate of U.S. Treasury bonds with a maturity similar to the expected life of the mine.

        The amount initially recorded as an ARO for a mine may change as a result of mining permit changes granted by mining regulators, changes in the timing of mining activities and the mine's productivity from original estimates and changes in the estimated costs or the timing of reclamation activities. We periodically update cash expenditures to meet each mine's reclamation requirements and we record an increase or decrease to the ARO to reflect the present value of the revised cash flow, which is determined using the current credit-adjusted, risk-free interest rate of U.S. Treasury bonds with a maturity similar to the expected remaining life of the mine. Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, or FAS 157, accordingly, any decrease in an ARO subsequent to its initial recognition will be calculated based using credit-adjusted, risk-free interest rate as of the date of the initial recognition of the ARO. We annually analyze the ARO on a mine-by-mine basis and, if necessary, adjust the balance to take into account any changes in estimates.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

        We evaluate the recorded amounts of our long-lived assets, other than goodwill, whenever events or circumstance indicate that a particular asset may be impaired. An impairment condition exists when the undiscounted cash flow attributable to an asset is less than the carrying value of the asset. Goodwill is evaluated annually for impairment during the fourth quarter of the year, or more frequently if circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred.

        When an impairment condition exists, the asset is written down to its fair value, which is generally determined using probability weighted, discounted cash flow scenarios. This process involves estimating both the amount and timing of the cash flows and judgment as to the probability weighting assigned to each scenario. Probability-weighted cash flows are discounted using the credit-adjusted, tax-free interest rate of U.S. Treasury bonds with a maturity similar to the impaired asset's remaining life.

94


Table of Contents

        Significant adverse changes to our business environment, interest rates and future cash flows could lead to the recognition of an impairment charge in future periods which could be material.

Share-Based Compensation

        Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, or FAS 123R, which requires public companies to measure the cost of any employee share-based awards issued at fair value. This cost is expensed over the time period that the option recipient is required to provide service to earn the granted options, typically the vesting period. We adopted the provisions of the statement using the modified retrospective transition method and estimate the fair value of certain share-based payment awards as of the grant date using a lattice-based option valuation model. Under the lattice-based option valuation model, inputs to the model, such as the expected volatility of the underlying share price over the expected term of the option, the expected dividends to be paid on the underlying share over the expected term of the option, the risk-free interest rate, the distribution of Rio Tinto's Total Shareholder Return, or TSR, relative to the HSBC Global Mining Index, or Index, the average return on the Index, the volatility of Index returns, the correlation between the return on the Index and weighted average TSR for Rio Tinto and the volatility of the uncorrelated returns must be estimated. Changing any of the model inputs could significantly change the calculation of the options grant date fair-value. Upon our adoption of FAS 123R, we were required to estimate the awards that we ultimately expect to vest and to reduce stock-based compensation expense for the effects of estimated forfeitures of awards over the expense recognition period. Although we estimated forfeitures based on historical experience, forfeitures in the future may differ. Under FAS 123R, the forfeiture rate must be revised if actual forfeitures differ from our original estimates. See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Income Taxes

        We provide for deferred income taxes for temporary differences arising from the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities at each balance sheet date, using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when the related taxes are expected to be paid or recovered. A deferred tax asset may be reduced by a valuation allowance when we, after assessing the probability of projected future taxable income and evaluating alternative tax planning strategies, believe that the future tax benefit may not be realized. Our consolidated deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2007 were $135.6 million, against which we had not established a valuation allowance. If future taxable income is lower than expected or if expected tax planning strategies are not available as anticipated, a valuation allowance may be needed.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

        We define market risk as the risk of economic loss as a consequence of the adverse movement of market rates and prices. We believe our principal market risks are commodity price risk and interest rate risk.

Commodity Price Risks

        Market risk includes the potential for changes in the market value of our coal portfolio. Due to the lack of quoted market prices and the long-term nature of the position, we have not quantified the market risk related to our coal supply agreements. As of June 30, 2008, we had agreed to sell 100% of our planned 2008 production. As of June 30, 2008, we have agreed to sell approximately 91% of our estimated 2009 production (excluding the Colowyo mine). In 2009, if we assume that the average selling price of coal increases by 10% from our 2007 average price per ton, we would recognize additional revenues on our remaining 2009 estimated production of approximately $13.9 million compared to 2007. Historically, we have managed the commodity price risk for our coal contract portfolio through

95


Table of Contents


the use of long-term coal supply agreements of varying terms and durations, rather than through the use of derivative instruments.

        We also face price risk involving other commodities used in our production process. We believe that price risks associated with diesel fuel and explosives are significant because of the recent price increases for these commodities. If we assume that we use the same quantities of these commodities in 2008 as we did in 2007 and further assume that the average costs of diesel fuel and explosives increase by 30% (which amount is indicative of average historical price increases we have experienced), we would incur additional fuel and explosive costs of approximately $40.6 million and $11.4 million in 2008 compared to $135.4 million and $38.0 million in 2007, respectively.

        Historically, we have not hedged commodities such as diesel fuel. We may enter into hedging arrangements in the future.

Interest Rate Risk

        If our new credit facility or other financing arrangements that we enter into require us to borrow money at an adjustable interest rate, then we may be subject to increased sensitivity to interest rate movements as they relate to our ability to repay our debt. As of December 31, 2007, we had $720.4 million of total debt, of which $500.6 million of intercompany debt had an adjustable interest rate that adjusted monthly, and was 4.27% as of June 30, 2008, compared to 6.50% as of December 31, 2007. This intercompany debt was contributed to capital on September 24, 2008. If we assume that we have the same debt outstanding in 2008 as we did as of December 31, 2007 and further assume that the average interest rate increases by 1%, we would recognize additional interest expense of approximately $5.0 million in 2008 as compared to 2007.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued FAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, or FAS 157, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 clarifies how to measure fair value as permitted under other accounting pronouncements but does not require any new fair value measurements. FAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. On February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 157-2, or FSP 157-2, which delayed the effective date of FAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis or at least once a year, to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The provisions of FSP 157-2 are effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009. The Company adopted the provisions of FAS 157 on January 1, 2008, except for those items deferred under FSP 157-2. The adoption of FAS 157 did not have a material effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, or FAS 159. FAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. FAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. FAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company did not elect the fair value option under FAS 159 for any of its financial assets or liabilities that are not already required to be presented at fair value and therefore the adoption of FAS 159 had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

96


Table of Contents

        In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, or FAS 141R, and FAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51, or FAS 160. FAS 141R and FAS 160 will significantly change the accounting for and reporting of business combination transactions and noncontrolling (minority) interests in consolidated financial statements. FAS 141R retains the fundamental requirements in FAS No. 141, "Business Combinations" while providing additional definitions, such as the definition of the acquirer in a purchase and improvements in the application of how the acquisition method is applied. FAS 160 will change the accounting and reporting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests, and classified as a component of equity. Both pronouncements become simultaneously effective January 1, 2009. Early adoption is not permitted. FAS 160 shall be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which it is initially applied, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements. The presentation and disclosure requirements shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that these pronouncements may have on its consolidated financial statements.

        In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, or FAS 161. This statement amends SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, or FAS 133, to require enhanced disclosures about an entity's derivative and hedging activities, including disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FAS 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. FAS 161 encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this pronouncement may have on its consolidated financial statements.

        In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets, or FSP 142-3, which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and early adoption is prohibited. The guidance for determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset will be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The disclosure requirements will be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of, and subsequent to, the effective date. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this FSP may have on its consolidated financial statements.

        In May 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or FAS 162. This statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. FAS 162 applies to financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP and shall be effective sixty days following the Securities and Exchange Commission's approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this pronouncement may have on its consolidated financial statements.

Seasonality

        Our business has historically experienced only limited variability in its results due to the effect of seasons. Demand for coal-fired power can increase due to unusually hot or cold weather as power

97


Table of Contents


consumers use more air conditioning or heating. Conversely, mild weather can result in softer demand for our coal. Adverse weather conditions, such as blizzards or floods, can impact our ability to mine and ship our coal, and our customers' ability to take delivery of coal.

Internal Controls

        Prior to this offering, we operated as an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto, which requires us to provide them financial information for inclusion in their consolidated financial reports. We provided this information in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, at a level of materiality commensurate with their consolidated financial statements and necessary to meet their regulatory financial reporting requirements.

        As a stand-alone public company, we will be required to comply with the record keeping, financial reporting, corporate governance and other rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, including the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, and other regulatory bodies. These entities generally require that financial information be reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which differs from IFRS. We will be required to report at a level of materiality commensurate with our stand-alone consolidated financial statements and necessary to meet our regulatory financial reporting requirements, which is lower than that of Rio Tinto.

        As an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto, we were not required to and did not have personnel with SEC, Sarbanes-Oxley, PCAOB and U.S. GAAP financial reporting expertise. In addition, we were not required to comply with the internal control design, documentation and testing requirements imposed by Sarbanes-Oxley on a stand-alone basis, but rather only complied to the extent required as a part of the Rio Tinto Group. In connection with this offering as a publicly-held, stand-alone company, we will become directly subject to these requirements.

        Effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary for us to provide reliable annual and interim financial reports and to prevent fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our operating results and financial condition could be materially misstated and our reputation could be significantly harmed. A material weakness in internal control over financial reporting is defined as a single deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the company's financial reporting. A deficiency in internal control over financial reporting exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis.

        For the years for which our consolidated financial statements are presented in this prospectus, we were not required to have, nor was our independent registered public accounting firm engaged to perform, an audit of our internal control over financial reporting. Our independent registered public accounting firm's audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, no such opinion was expressed. During the preparation of our carve-out consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, through our own assessment we determined that we have, and our independent registered public accounting firm informed our management of, material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting as a stand-alone company that, if not properly corrected, could result in material misstatements in our financial reporting. Specifically, we did not maintain a sufficient

98


Table of Contents


complement of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting and financial reporting knowledge, experience and training in the application of U.S. GAAP commensurate with our financial reporting requirements and complexity of our operation and transactions. In addition, we did not maintain an adequate system of processes and internal controls as a stand-alone public company sufficient to support our financial reporting requirements and produce timely and accurate U.S. GAAP consolidated financial statements consistent with being a stand-alone public company. In addition, during the preparation of our consolidated financial statements as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2008, we identified an error in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Specifically, we had not recorded an accrual at March 31, 2008 for certain charges from an affiliated entity, totaling $2.0 million, thereby understating selling, general and administrative expenses and amounts due to related parties by this amount in our March 31, 2008 consolidated financial statements. These amounts have been appropriately reflected in our consolidated financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2008, appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, and we have revised the financial statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2008 as appropriate, which appear elsewhere in this prospectus.

        In connection with our separation from Rio Tinto America and this offering, we have been engaged in a program to evaluate our system of internal control over financial reporting. This program has consisted of a review of current processes and controls; identification of deficiencies; and evaluation of the deficiencies' effect on our consolidated financial statements. We are continuing to work on our remediation plan to improve the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as an independent public company. The plan includes:

Financial Reporting Function

Controls Documentation/Testing Process

        We have taken several important steps in progressing our remediation plan. These steps include hiring a director of financial reporting, contracting with an outside firm to provide investor and public relations support, and continuing to interview candidates for other key positions we intend to fill. In addition, in connection with this offering, we will be entering into a Transition Services Agreement with an affiliate of Rio Tinto America to transition other essential services.

        Under current requirements, our independent registered public accounting firm is not required to evaluate and assess our internal control over financial reporting until its audit of our 2009 consolidated financial statements. Consequently, we will not be evaluated independently in respect of our controls

99


Table of Contents


for a substantial period of time after this offering is completed. As a result, we may not become aware of other material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal controls that may be later identified by our independent registered public accounting firm as part of the evaluation.

        The measures or activities we have taken to date, or any future measures or activities we will take, may not remediate the material weaknesses we have identified. See "Risk Factors—We have identified material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting that, if not properly corrected, could result in material misstatements in our financial reporting" and "Risk Factors—We will be required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls. If we are unable to achieve and maintain effective internal controls, our operating results and financial condition could be harmed" included elsewhere in this prospectus.

100


Table of Contents


THE COAL INDUSTRY

        Coal is an abundant and affordable natural resource used primarily to provide fuel for the generation of electric power. World-wide recoverable coal reserves are estimated to be approximately 1.0 trillion tons based on the EIA's International Energy Annual 2005. Based on 2006 EIA data, the U.S. is one of the world's largest producers of coal, with coal reserves representing approximately 230 years of U.S. supply based on current usage rates. Coal is the most abundant fossil fuel in the U.S., representing the vast majority of the nation's total fossil fuel reserves.

Industry Trends

        Coal markets and coal prices are influenced by a number of factors and can vary significantly by region. The global supply and demand balance for coal as well as the overall increase in prices for energy-based commodities such as natural gas and crude oil, has resulted in rising prices for the coal we produce. In recent years, the U.S. coal market has been characterized by increasing prices with some pricing volatility. Coal consumption in the U.S. and particularly from the PRB has been at historic highs, driven in recent periods by several market dynamics and trends, which may or may not continue, including the following:

         Continued strong demand in the U.S. steam coal market.    Domestic demand for steam coal continues to be strong, driven primarily by growth in electricity demand, which is expected to increase at an average annual rate of 1.1% from 2007 through 2020, according to the EIA (which assumes no future federal or state carbon emissions legislation is enacted and assumes a significant number of additional coal-fired power plants will be built during the period). In recent months, however, there has been a slow down in electricity demand due to recent market conditions. Increased utilization rates by existing power plants are projected by the EIA to be a driver of coal demand. According to the EIA, the average capacity factor for coal-fired plants in 2007 was 73%. This capacity factor was relatively flat compared with 2006, but prior to that, plants had been averaging about 1% capacity factor increase per year over the prior five years. We believe that increases in the capacity factor may significantly increase coal demand in upcoming years.

         Increased international demand, growing export market and increased demand from U.S. steel market.    International demand for coal continues to be driven by rapid growth in electrical power generation capacity in Asia, particularly in China and India. China and India represented approximately 44% of total world coal consumption in 2005 and are expected to account for approximately 50% by 2030, according to the EIA. The increase in international demand has led to increased demand for coal exports from the U.S. During the first half of 2008, coal exports for both steam and metallurgical coal have increased. This is attributable to increased demand for U.S. coal in Europe. The decreasing value of the U.S. dollar in recent periods relative to foreign currencies has also increased the demand for U.S. coal in the export market. Additionally, demand for metallurgical coal needed to produce steel has continued to increase. While we do not produce any metallurgical coal, this demand is diverting coal that could be sold as steam coal into the metallurgical coal market. We expect to the extent that the capabilities for shipping large volumes of western U.S. coal to eastern U.S. markets continue to improve, PRB coal may increasingly be substituted for eastern U.S. coal, which is currently in short supply due to increased export demand and production constraints.

         Changes in U.S. regional production.    Coal production in the eastern U.S., other than the Illinois Basin, has declined in recent years because of production difficulties, reserve degradation and difficulties acquiring permits needed to conduct mining operations. Shortages and decreases in supply in the eastern U.S., including due to increasing demand in the foreign markets, continue to affect pricing in the eastern U.S. Production in the eastern U.S. has recently increased due to a surge in foreign demand. However, this trend is unlikely to continue indefinitely according to the EIA. We believe that many eastern utilities are considering blending coals as an option to offset increasing eastern U.S. coal prices and meet more stringent environmental requirements, as discussed below.

101


Table of Contents

         Coal remains a cost-competitive energy source relative to alternative fossil fuels and other alternative energy sources.    Coal continues to be a low cost source of energy relative to its substitutes because of the high prices for alternative fossil fuels. Coal also has a lower all-in cost relative to other alternative energy sources, such as nuclear, hydroelectric, wind and solar power. PRB coal in particular remains a cost-competitive energy source because it exists in greater abundance and is easier and cheaper to mine than coal produced in other regions. Changes in the prices for other fossil fuels or alternative energy sources in the future could impact the price of coal.

         Increased Prices for PRB Coal.    Although U.S. coal markets have recently experienced significant volatility, spot prices for PRB coal have more than doubled from $6.15 to $14.65 per ton for 8,800 Btu coal from January 2005 to September 2008. However, prices in September 2008 are down from a high of $15.75 in June 2008. Market prices for 8,800 Btu coal we have received recently reached more than $20/ton for deliveries in 2010. The prices for alternative fossil fuels, such as oil and natural gas, have been at historic highs in recent periods, and future changes in the prices for these fossil fuels may impact the price of coal. See "Risk Factors—Coal prices are subject to change and a substantial or extended decline in prices could materially and adversely affect our revenues and results of operations, as well as the value of our coal reserves."

         Increasingly Stringent Air Quality Regulations.    A series of more stringent requirements relating to particulate matter, ozone, haze, mercury, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and other air pollutants have been proposed and/or enacted by federal and/or state regulatory authorities in recent years. As a result of some of these regulations, increased demand for western U.S. coal has occurred as coal-fired electricity producers have switched from bituminous coal to lower sulfur sub-bituminous coal. The PRB has benefited from this switching and its market share has increased accordingly. However, increasingly stringent air regulations may lead some coal-fired plants to install additional pollution control equipment, such as scrubbers, thereby reducing the need for low sulfur coal. Considerable uncertainty is associated with these air emission regulations, a few of which, including the Clean Air Interstate Rule, or CAIR, and the Clean Air Mercury Rule, or CAMR, have been vacated by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. As a result, it is not possible to determine the impact of such regulatory initiatives on coal demand nationwide but they could be material. See "Risk Factors—Extensive environmental regulations, including existing and potential future regulatory requirements relating to air emissions, affect our customers and could reduce the demand for coal as a fuel source and cause coal prices and sales of our coal to materially decline" and "Because we produce and sell coal with a low sulfur content, a reduction in the price of sulfur dioxide emission allowances or increased use of technologies to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions could materially and adversely affect the demand for our coal and our results of operations" and "Environmental and Other Regulatory Matters."

Demand for U.S. Coal Production

U.S. Coal Market Demand

        Coal is used primarily by utilities to generate electricity, commonly referred to as "steam coal," by steel companies to produce coke for use in blast furnaces, commonly referred to as "metallurgical coal," and by a variety of industrial users to heat and power foundries, cement plants, paper mills, chemical plants and other manufacturing and processing facilities. Based on preliminary EIA data for 2007, 97% of coal consumed in the U.S. in 2007 was from domestic production sources. Coal produced in the U.S. is also exported to Canada, Europe and other locations, primarily from eastern coal supply sources and east or gulf coast terminals. The following table sets forth historical and projected demand trends for U.S. coal by consuming sector for the periods indicated, according to the EIA.

102


Table of Contents

US coal consumption by sector
(in millions)

 
   
   
   
   
   
  Annual Growth  
 
  Actual
2001
  Actual
2004
  Actual
2007
  Forecast
2010
  Forecast
2020
 
 
  2001-2010   2010-2020  

Electric power

    964     1,016     1,046     1,054     1,202     1.0 %   1.3 %

Other Industrial

    65     62     57     64     59     (0.3 )%   (0.8 )%

Coke plants

    26     24     23     23     20     (1.5 )%   (1.1 )%

Residential/Commercial

    4     5     3     4     4     (0.9 )%   (0.1 )%

Coal to liquids

    0     0     0     0     42              
                                   

Total US Consumption

    1,060     1,107     1,129     1,145     1,327     0.9 %   1.5 %
                                   

Source: EIA Annual Energy Review 2007 and Annual Energy Outlook 2008

        The nation's power generation infrastructure is largely coal-fired, principally because of the relatively low cost and abundance of coal. As a result, coal has consistently supplied 49% to 52% of U.S. electricity power generation production during the past 10 years, according to the EIA. Coal is generally the lowest cost fossil-fuel used for base-load electric power generation and, historically, has been considerably less expensive than natural gas or oil. According to EIA projections, for a new coal-fired plant built today, fuel and associated operating and maintenance costs would represent about 30% of total costs, whereas the fuel and associated operating and maintenance costs for a new natural gas-fired plant would be about 70%. Coal-fired generation is also competitive with nuclear power generation, especially on a total cost per megawatt-hour basis. The production of electricity from existing hydroelectric facilities is inexpensive, but new sources are scarce and its application is limited both by geography and susceptibility to seasonal and climatic conditions. In 2007, non-hydropower renewable power generation, such as wind power, accounted for only 2.5% of all the electricity generated in the U.S. and is currently not economically competitive with existing technologies. Coal consumption patterns are also influenced by the demand for electricity, governmental regulation affecting power generation, technological developments and the location, availability and cost of other energy sources such as nuclear and hydroelectric power. For example, recent declines in electricity demand due to the slowing economy have led to decreased demand for coal. The following chart sets forth the breakdown of U.S. electricity generation by energy source from February 2007 to February 2008, according to the EIA.

GRAPHIC


Source: EIA Electric Power Monthly (May 2008)

103


Table of Contents

        The EIA projects that generators of electricity will increase their demand for coal as demand for electricity increases. The EIA estimates that total U.S. electricity use will increase at an average annual rate of 0.9% from 2007 to 2020, despite projected efforts throughout the U.S. for industrial, residential and other consumers to become more energy efficient. Coal consumption has generally grown at the pace of electricity growth because coal-fueled electricity generation is used in most cases to meet "base-load" requirements, which are the minimum amounts of electric power delivered or required over a given period of time at a steady rate. Based on estimates compiled by EIA, U.S. coal consumption for electric generation is expected to grow 1.1% per year until 2020. These amounts assume no future federal or state carbon emissions legislation is enacted and do not take into account recent market conditions.

        Based on EIA projections, current capacity for electricity generation may not be enough to support projected electricity demand. The EIA projected that 106 GW of new electricity capacity will be needed between 2006 and 2020, with approximately 35% of the new capacity estimated to come from coal-fired generation. Because the EIA projections are based on factors and assumptions contained in its forecasts, actual amounts of new capacity may differ significantly from those estimates and if they differ negatively, the amount of new electricity capacity needed may not grow as the EIA projects.

        The proposed plants or expansions are utilizing the full spectrum of technologies from pulverized coal and circulating fluidized bed, which permit coal to be more easily burned, and integrated coal gasification cycle units, which permit coal to be turned into a gasified product for the easier capture of carbon in the future. Many projects that are moving forward are being developed by municipals and regulated utilities due to their ability to recover costs, prior experience with coal and availability of low cost capital.

Western U.S. Coal Market Demand

        According to the EIA, annual U.S. coal demand is projected to reach 1.327 billion tons by 2020, with approximately 56% of the demand supplied by the western U.S. This is due to several factors, including utilities switching from higher cost, depleting eastern U.S. coals to more abundant, lower cost and lower sulfur western U.S. coal. Demand for clean-burning, low sulfur coal has also grown significantly since the adoption of the Clean Air Act. In addition, as higher Btu eastern U.S. coal is shipped to international markets for both steam and metallurgical use and to the extent that the capabilities for shipping large volumes of western U.S. coal to eastern U.S. markets continues to improve, PRB coal may increasingly be substituted for eastern U.S. coal, which is currently in short supply due to increased export demand and production constraints.

        According to EIA estimates, the PRB produced approximately 480 million tons of coal in 2007. The EIA is further projecting PRB production to reach 554 million tons by 2020. As of October 1, 2008, approximately 11 LBAs, including LBAs for us and our competitors, are pending, totaling approximately 4.7 billion tons of federal coal in Wyoming. There can be no assurances that any of these LBAs will be granted. In addition, railroads servicing the PRB are increasing capacity to meet the anticipated increase in coal shipping volumes.

        In order to meet the expected increased demand for coal-fired generation, the EIA has forecasted that 37 GW of coal-fired generation (planned and unplanned) will come online between 2007 and 2020, of which 11 GW will come online in the next four years. This new capacity could accommodate an increase in coal production of up to approximately 159 million tons. Some of these new coal-fired plants will offset retirements of existing units, but overall GWs of coal-fired generation would grow if these plants are built. Based on EIA data, the PRB is expected to supply significantly more of the new electricity generation needs than any other coal-producing region. There can be no assurances that this additional capacity will actually come online as projected by the EIA. See "Risk Factors—The use of alternative energy sources for power generation could reduce coal consumption by U.S. electric power generators, which could result in lower prices for our coal, which could reduce our revenues and materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations."

104


Table of Contents

U.S. Coal Production and Distribution

        U.S. coal production was approximately 1.146 billion tons in 2007 based on information from the EIA. The following table sets forth production statistics in each of the major U.S. coal producing regions for the period indicated based on EIA data and projections. Forecast amounts in the table below assume no future federal or state carbon emissions legislation is enacted, assume a significant number of additional coal-fired power plants will be built during the forecast period and do not take into account recent market conditions. See "—Special Note Regarding EIA Market Data and Projections" below.

Tonnages from major coal producing regions

 
   
   
   
   
   
  Annual Growth  
 
  Actual
2001
  Actual
2004
  Actual
2007
  Forecast
2010
  Forecast
2020
 
Tons (million)
  2001-2010   2010-2020  

Powder River Basin

    393     421     480 (2)   481     554     2.3 %   1.4 %

Central Appalachia

    269     232     226     206     131     (3.0 )%   (4.4 )%

Northern Appalachia

    142     135     132     153     174     0.8 %   1.3 %

Illinois Basin

    95     90     96     107     120     1.3 %   1.2 %

Other(1)

    228     233     212     219     291     (0.4 )%   2.9 %
                                   

Total

    1,127     1,112     1,146     1,166     1,270     0.4 %   0.9 %
                                   

Percentage of tons

                                           

Powder River Basin

    35 %   38 %   42 %   41 %   44 %            

Central Appalachia

    24 %   21 %   20 %   18 %   10 %            

Northern Appalachia

    13 %   12 %   12 %   13 %   14 %            

Illinois Basin

    8 %   8 %   8 %   9 %   9 %            

Other

    20 %   21 %   18 %   19 %   23 %            

(1)
Includes production from other coal producing regions in the U.S., including the Uinta Basin, Southern Appalachia and the Interior region, other than the Illinois Basin.

(2)
PRB production amounts for 2007 based on 2007 projected production amounts published by the EIA.

Source: EIA Annual Coal Reports (2001 and 2004), Annual Energy Outlook 2008 and Supplemental Tables to the Annual Energy Outlook 2008

Coal Regions

        Coal is mined from coal fields throughout the U.S., with the major production centers located in the western U.S., Northern and Central Appalachia and the Illinois Basin. The quality of coal varies by region. Heat value, sulfur content and suitability for production of metallurgical coke are important quality characteristics and are used to determine the best end use for the particular coal types. All of our coal production comes from the PRB in the Western region.

        The Western region includes, among other areas, the PRB and the Uinta Basin region. According to the EIA, coal produced in the western U.S. increased from 408.3 million tons in 1994 to 621.0 million tons in 2007 as regulations limiting sulfur dioxide emissions have increased demand for low sulfur coal over this period.

         Powder River Basin.    The PRB is located in northeastern Wyoming and southeastern Montana. Coal from the PRB is sub-bituminous coal with low sulfur content ranging from 0.2% to 0.9% and heating values ranging from 8,000 to 9,500 Btu.

105


Table of Contents

        The portion of the PRB located in the state of Wyoming is typically referred to as the Southern PRB. In the early 1970s, utilities began turning to western low sulfur coal to meet new air quality standards. PRB coal is also a low cost energy source for utilities. Coal produced from the Southern PRB has a heat value in the range of 8,000 to 8,900 Btu and sulfur content ranging from 0.2% to 0.9%. Four major coal producers in addition to us, Arch Coal, Inc., Foundation Coal Corporation, Kiewit Mining Group, Inc. and Peabody Energy Corporation, operate in the Southern PRB region.

        The portion of the PRB that is located in the state of Montana is typically referred to as the Northern PRB. The coal mined in the Northern PRB comes from two areas: the Colstrip area, which is characterized by a lower Btu (<8,800 Btu) and higher sulfur content (>0.6%), and the area around our Spring Creek and Decker mines, which is characterized by Btu in the range of 9,300 to 9,500 and sulfur content around 0.3% to 0.4%. The Spring Creek/Decker area also typically has higher sodium content of approximately 1.0% to 9.0%. Our company, Kiewit Mining Group, Inc. and Westmoreland Coal Company operate in the Northern PRB region.

         Uinta Basin.    The Uinta Basin includes western Colorado and eastern Utah. The coal from this region typically has a sulfur content of 0.4% to 0.8% and a heat value of between 10,000 and 12,500 Btu. The major producers in this region include Arch Coal, Inc., CONSOL Energy Inc. and Peabody Energy Corporation. The Colowyo mine, which will not be transferred to Cloud Peak Energy in connection with this offering, is located in the Uinta Basin.

Eastern United States

         Appalachian Region.    The Appalachian Region, located in the eastern U.S., is divided into the north, central and southern Appalachian regions. According to the EIA, coal produced in the Appalachian Region decreased from 445.4 million tons in 1994 to 377.1 million tons in 2007, primarily as a result of the depletion of economically attractive reserves, permitting issues and increasing costs of production. Coal mined from this region generally has a high heat value of 12,000 to 14,000 Btu and sulfur content from 1% to 3.5%.

         Interior Region.    The Interior Region is comprised of the Illinois Basin and other coal-producing states in the interior of the U.S. According to the EIA, coal produced in the interior region decreased from 179.9 million tons in 1994 to 146.6 million tons in 2007. Coal from this region generally has a heat value of 10,500 to 12,000 Btu and sulfur content from 1% to 3.5%.

Largest U.S. Coal Producers

        The following table sets forth the largest coal producers based on tons produced in the U.S. in 2007.

Company
  Tonnage   Total U.S.  
 
  (in millions)
   
 

Peabody Energy Corporation(1)

    192.3     16.8 %

Cloud Peak Energy Inc.(2)

    132.3     11.5 %

Arch Coal, Inc.(3)

    128.1     11.2 %

Foundation Coal Corporation

    71.8     6.3 %

CONSOL Energy Inc. 

    64.6     5.6 %

Massey Energy Company

    39.0     3.4 %

Kiewit Mining Group, Inc. 

    37.5     3.3 %

North American Coal Corporation

    34.0     3.0 %

Westmoreland Coal Company

    30.0     2.6 %

Murray Energy Corporation

    27.1     2.4 %

106


Table of Contents

Transportation

        Coal used for domestic consumption is generally sold free on board at the mine or nearest loading facility. The purchaser normally bears the transportation costs whether by rail or barge. Export coal, however, is usually sold at the export shipment port, and coal producers are responsible for shipment to the coal-loading facility at the port of exit, with the buyer paying the ocean freight.

        Historically, most electricity generators arranged long-term shipping contracts with rail or barge companies to assure stable delivery costs. Transportation can be a large component of a purchaser's total cost. Although the purchaser pays the freight, transportation costs still are important to coal mining companies because the purchaser may choose a supplier largely based on cost of transportation. Rail costs can constitute up to 70% of the delivered cost of PRB coal, depending on then-current coal prices, with the relative transportation component increasing with increasing distance from the mine and where switching between different transport providers is required. According to the National Mining Association, in 2006 railroads accounted for approximately three-fourths of total U.S. coal shipments, while river barge and lake movements account for an additional 10%. Trucks and overland conveyors haul coal over shorter distances, while barges, Great Lake carriers and ocean vessels move coal to export markets and domestic markets requiring shipment over the Great Lakes and the Mississippi and Missouri rivers.

        Most coal mines are served by a single rail company, but much of the PRB is served by two rail carriers, the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway, or BNSF, and the Union Pacific Railroad, or UP. In the eastern U.S. there are two primary railroads, the Norfolk Southern Railway, or NS, and Chessie Seaboard Multiplier Transportation Inc., or CSX. Besides rail deliveries, eastern customers typically rely on a river barge system. Current railway capabilities are not generally sufficient for the shipping of large volumes of western U.S. coal into eastern U.S. markets. Greater co-operation and equipment standardization between the BNSF, UP, NS and CSX railroads and further development of railway infrastructure will be needed, for large volumes of western U.S. coal to be shipped to the east.

        The Southern PRB is currently served by the BNSF and UP railroads, which provide access to many western and midwestern utilities and to interchange points where NS and CSX could provide access to eastern utilities. The BNSF serves all mines in the Southern PRB while the UP only serves the mines south of Gillette, Wyoming on what is known as the Joint Line of the BNSF/UP railroads. The Joint Line is a 103-mile long corridor with more than 295 miles of double, triple and quadruple track segments. Over the last several years, BNSF and UP have invested heavily into the Joint Line to make sure capacity on the railway meets future demand. In 2007, the Joint Line portion of the Southern PRB shipped approximately 360 million tons of coal and based on the railroads' estimates the Joint Line is expected to transport approximately 390 million tons in 2008. Announced expansion plans by the two railroads could increase capacity on the Joint Line to approximately 500 million tons by 2012.

        The number of railroads serving the Southern PRB could increase in the future if the Dakota, Minnesota and Eastern, or DM&E, PRB railroad expansion project is constructed. A railroad spur proposed by DM&E may provide additional access to upper Midwest and Great Lakes markets, and, if constructed, will compete with BNSF and UP. In the fall of 2007, the Canadian Pacific railroad announced it would purchase DM&E for $1.5 billion. The Surface Transportation Board needs to approve the purchase of DM&E by the Canadian Pacific railroad, and the approval process is expected to be completed by the end of 2008. We cannot assure you that the expansion project will be completed as expected.

107


Table of Contents

        The Northern PRB is served solely by the BNSF railroad, which provides access to utility and industrial markets in the Midwestern Upper Great Lakes region and northern tier states. BNSF also provides access to export markets through Western U.S. and Canada ports. The addition of new railroad facilities including, for example, the Tongue River Railroad, or the upgrade of existing facilities in Montana could result in increased production in Montana and competition for available coal located in Montana. In 2007, the Northern PRB produced 43 million tons of coal, of which 31 million tons were railed to customers by BNSF. The remaining Northern PRB production served local markets. BNSF is projected to transport approximately 33 million tons of Northern PRB production in 2008.

Special Note Regarding EIA Market Data and Projections

        Coal industry market data and projections referred to in this section and prepared by the EIA reflect statements of what might happen in the coal industry given the assumptions and methodologies used by the EIA. Industry projections of the EIA are subject to numerous assumptions and methodologies chosen by the EIA. For example, these projections assume that the laws and regulations in effect at the time of the projections remain unchanged and do not reflect any assumed pricing for carbon emissions in the forecast period or assume that any future federal or state carbon emissions legislation has been enacted. In addition, these projections may assume certain general economic conditions or industry conditions and commodity prices for alternative energy sources at the time of the projection that may or may not reflect actual economic or industry conditions during the forecast period, including with respect to planned and unplanned additional electricity generating capacity. Actual results may differ from those results projected by the EIA, including projections related to the demand for additional electricity generating capacity, because of changes in economic conditions, laws or regulations, pricing for other energy sources or because of other factors not anticipated in the EIA projection.

108


Table of Contents


BUSINESS

Overview

        We are the second largest producer of coal in the U.S. and in the PRB based on 2007 coal production. We operate some of the safest mines in the industry. According to MSHA data, in 2007 we had the lowest employee all injury incident rate among the 5 largest U.S. coal producing companies. We operate solely in the PRB, the lowest cost coal producing region of the major coal producing regions in the U.S., and operate three of the five largest coal mines in the region and in the U.S. Our operations include four wholly-owned surface coal mines, three of which are in Wyoming and one in Montana, and we own a 50% interest in another surface coal mine in Montana. We produce sub-bituminous steam coal with low sulfur content and sell our coal primarily to electric utilities, supplying approximately 75 customers with over 140 domestic plants. We do not produce any metallurgical coal. Steam coal is primarily consumed by electric utilities and industrial consumers as fuel for electricity generation. In 2007, the coal we produced generated approximately 6.0% of the electricity produced in the U.S. As of September 30, 2008, we controlled approximately 1.7 billion tons of coal, consisting of approximately 1.4 billion tons of proven and probable coal reserves and approximately 104 million tons of non-reserve coal deposits as of December 31, 2007, and approximately 288 million tons of additional non-reserve coal deposits, according to BLM estimates, that we acquired in April 2008.

        We continue to experience favorable market conditions in the coal industry. Growth in domestic consumption and a sharp rise in U.S. coal exports, particularly from the eastern U.S., have resulted in coal prices significantly above the historical averages. As higher Btu eastern U.S. coal is shipped to international markets for steam and metallurgical use, and to the extent that the capabilities for shipping large volumes of western U.S. coal to eastern U.S. coal markets continue to improve, PRB coal may increasingly be substituted for eastern U.S. coal, which is currently in short supply due to increased export demand and production constraints. In addition, while PRB coal generally has not been exported, recent interest from foreign buyers is increasing, including for higher Btu coal from our Spring Creek mine. Because we operate solely in the PRB, the lowest cost coal producing region of the major coal producing regions in the U.S., we benefit from the fact that our mines are among the lowest cost and highest producing mines in the U.S. We sell our production under contracts of varying lengths, including spot sales, to mitigate our exposure to potential fluctuations in coal prices. We have agreed to sell all of our estimated production for 2008. As of June 30, 2008, approximately 9% and 30% of our estimated production of approximately 137.6 million tons and 140.6 million tons for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively, remain unsold.

        For the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, excluding Colowyo and other non-coal business, we:


Our Strengths

        We believe that the following strengths enhance our market position:

         We are the second largest coal producer in the U.S. and in the PRB and have a significant reserve base.    Based on 2007 production of 132.3 million tons, we are the second largest coal producer in the U.S. and in the PRB. As of September 30, 2008, we controlled approximately 1.7 billion tons of coal, consisting of approximately 1.4 billion tons of proven and probable coal reserves and approximately 104 million tons of non-reserve coal deposits as of December 31, 2007, and approximately 288 million

109


Table of Contents


tons of additional non-reserve coal deposits, according to BLM estimates, that we acquired in April 2008.

         We operate highly productive mines in the PRB, the lowest cost coal producing region of the major coal producing regions in the U.S.    All of our mines are located in the PRB, which is the lowest cost coal producing region of the major coal producing regions in the U.S. We operate three of the five largest mines in the PRB and the U.S. We believe that our large PRB mines provide us with significant economies of scale. We benefit from the fact that our mines are among the lowest cost and highest producing mines in the U.S.

         Our acquisition of additional LBAs and surface rights and our substantial capital investments in our mines in recent years have positioned us well for the future.    We have focused on strategic acquisitions and subsequent expansions of large, low operating cost, low sulfur operations in the PRB and replacement of, and additions to, our reserves through the LBA process and the acquisition of related surface rights. From January 1, 2005 to October 1, 2008, we acquired an additional 283 million tons of reserves as well as the recently acquired South Maysdorf tract that the BLM estimates to contain 288 million tons of non-reserve coal deposits for a total commitment of $417.0 million, of which we have already made cash installment payments of $146.1 million. From January 1, 2005 to September 30, 2008, we have also made significant capital expenditures in our mining facilities and equipment, investing $552.5 million. Over the last few years we have:

These investments have increased our existing mines' capacity and productivity. We have also nominated as LBAs tracts of land that we believe contain, as applied for, approximately 1.8 billion tons of non-reserve coal deposits according to our estimates and subject to final determination by the BLM of the final boundaries and tonnage for these tracts. Accordingly, we believe we are well-positioned for the future through the strategic acquisition of additional LBAs and surface rights. We continue to analyze ways to upgrade our equipment and facilities in order to maintain a high quality and cost-effective platform for the mining and processing of our coal resources.

         We are well-positioned to take advantage of strong industry trends in the U.S. and in the PRB region.    Recent increases in U.S. coal consumption have been driven primarily by increased use of existing electricity generation capacity and the construction of new coal-fired power plants. We expect to the extent that the capabilities for shipping large volumes of western U.S. coal to eastern U.S. markets continue to improve, PRB coal may increasingly be substituted for eastern U.S. coal, which is currently in short supply due to increased export demand and production constraints. In addition, increasingly stringent air quality laws and the related cost of scrubbers may favor low sulfur PRB coal over other types of coal, creating additional domestic demand for PRB coal. According to the EIA, annual U.S. coal demand is projected to reach 1.33 billion tons by 2020, compared to demand of 1.13 billion tons in 2007 (which assumes no future federal or state carbon emissions legislation is enacted). The western U.S. is expected to represent approximately 56% of U.S. coal demand in 2020.

         Our employee-related liabilities are low for our industry.    We only operate surface mines. As a result, our exposure to certain health claims and post-retirement liabilities, such as black-lung disease, is lower relative to some of our publicly traded competitors that operate underground mines. Our

110


Table of Contents


pension obligations were fully funded at the end of 2007. As part of our separation from Rio Tinto America, obligations for pension and post-retirement welfare for active employees will be retained by us, and obligations for employees who have retired as of the date of our separation from Rio Tinto America will be retained by Rio Tinto America.

         We have a strong safety and environmental record.    We operate some of the industry's safest mines. According to data from MSHA, in 2007 we had the lowest employee all injury incident rate among the 5 largest U.S. coal producing companies. All of the mines we operate are ISO 14001 certified, and we are committed to maintaining a system that controls and reduces the environmental impacts of mining operations. We maintain a well-documented management system to help ensure that laws, regulations, objectives and targets applicable to our operations are known and implemented. We have also won numerous state and federal awards for our strong safety and environmental record. As a result of our safety and environmental records, we believe we have positive relationships with industry regulators.

         Our senior management team has extensive industry experience.    Our senior management team has significant work experience in the mining and energy industries, with on average            years of relevant mining experience. Most members of our senior management team gained this experience through various positions held within the Rio Tinto Group, one of the largest mining companies in the world.

Business Strategy

        Our business strategy is to:

         Capitalize on favorable U.S. and worldwide coal industry market conditions.    Growth in domestic coal consumption and a sharp rise in U.S. coal exports, particularly from the eastern U.S., have resulted in coal prices in recent periods significantly above the historical averages. As higher Btu eastern U.S. coal is shipped to international markets for steam and metallurgical use, and to the extent that the capabilities for shipping large volumes of western U.S. coal to eastern U.S. markets continue to improve, PRB coal may increasingly be substituted for eastern U.S. coal, which is currently in short supply due to increased export demand and production constraints. While only a small percentage of PRB coal is currently exported, recent interest from foreign buyers is increasing, including for higher Btu coal from our Spring Creek mine in Montana.

         Continue to build our reserves.    We have focused on strategic acquisitions and subsequent expansions of large, low cost, low sulfur operations in the PRB and replacement of, and additions to, our reserves through the acquisition of companies, mines and reserves. We will continue to seek to increase our reserve position by acquiring federal coal through the LBA process and by purchasing surface rights for land adjoining our current operations in Wyoming and Montana. For example, in 2005 we added 175.4 million tons of reserves in an LBA for our Antelope mine, in 2007 we acquired 107.5 million tons of reserves in an LBA for our Spring Creek mine, and in April 2008, we acquired the South Maysdorf LBA tract, adjacent to our Cordero Rojo mine, containing approximately 288 million tons of non-reserve coal deposits, as estimated by the BLM. We have applications outstanding for four LBAs to be bid over the next three years, that cover, as applied for, approximately 1.8 billion tons of non-reserve coal deposits according to our estimates and subject to final determination by the BLM of the final boundaries and tonnage for these LBA tracts. We will continue to explore additional opportunities to increase our reserve base.

         Focus on operating efficiency and leverage our economies of scale.    We will seek to control our costs by continuing to improve on our operating efficiency. Following this offering and our separation from Rio Tinto America, we will remain the second largest producer of coal in the U.S. based on 2007 production statistics. We believe we will continue to benefit from significant economies of scale through the integrated management and operation of our four wholly-owned mines. We have historically

111


Table of Contents


improved our existing operations and evaluated and implemented new mining equipment and technologies to improve our efficiency. Our large fleet of mining equipment, information technology systems and coordinated equipment utilization and maintenance management functions allows us to enhance our efficiency. Our experienced and well-trained workforce is key in identifying and implementing business improvement initiatives.

         Leverage our excellence in safety and environmental compliance.    We operate some of the safest coal mines in the U.S. We have also achieved recognized standards of environmental stewardship. We continue to implement safety measures and environmental initiatives to promote safe operating practices and improved environmental stewardship. We believe the ability to minimize injuries and maintain our focus on environmental compliance improves our productivity, lowers our costs and helps us attract and retain our employees.

         Opportunistically pursue acquisitions that will create value and expand our core business.    We intend to pursue acquisition opportunities that are consistent with our business strategy and that we believe will create value for our shareholders.

Mining Operations

        We operate solely in the PRB. Three of our mines are located in Wyoming, and two of our mines are located in Montana, including our 50% interest in the Decker mine. We currently own almost all of the equipment utilized in our mining operations, excluding the Decker mine. We employ sophisticated preventative maintenance and rebuild programs and upgrade our equipment to ensure that it is productive, well-maintained and cost-competitive. Our maintenance programs also utilize procedures designed to enhance the efficiencies of our operations. The following table provides summary information regarding our mines as of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008 and the following sections describe in more detail our mining operations, the coal mining methods used, certain characteristics of our coal and the process by which we acquire our reserves. All of our coal is classified as steam coal and we produce no metallurgical coal.

Mine
  Mining Technology   Transportation   Tons Sold
in 2005
  Tons Sold
in 2006
  Tons Sold
in 2007
  Tons Sold as of
June 30, 2008
 
 
   
   
  (in millions)
  (in millions)
  (in millions)
  (in millions)
 

Antelope

  Dragline
Truck-and-Shovel
  BNSF, UP     30.0     33.9     34.5     17.6  

Cordero Rojo

  Dragline
Truck-and-Shovel
  BNSF, UP     37.7     39.8     40.5     19.0  

Jacobs Ranch

  Dragline
Truck-and-Shovel
  BNSF, UP     37.3     40.0     38.1     18.9  

Spring Creek

  Dragline
Truck-and-Shovel
  BNSF     13.1     14.5     15.7     8.3  

Decker(*)

  Dragline
Truck-and-Shovel
  BNSF     3.5     3.6     3.5     1.6  

Other(**)

            4.9     5.3     6.3     3.0  
                           

Total

            126.5     137.1     138.6     68.4  
                           

BNSF = Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
UP = Union Pacific Railroad

*
Based on our 50% interest in our Decker mine.

**
The tonnage shown for Other represents our purchases from third party sources that we have resold.

112


Table of Contents

        The Antelope mine, located in the southern end of the PRB approximately 60 miles south of Gillette, Wyoming, extracts steam coal from the Anderson and Canyon Seams, with up to 44 and 36 feet, respectively, in thickness, using the dragline and truck-and-shovel methods. The Antelope mine shipped 34.5 million tons in 2007 with an as delivered estimated average heat value of approximately 8,850 Btu, ash content of 5.5% and sulfur content of 0.25% (0.6 lbs SO2/mmBtu). We estimate it will produce approximately 36 million tons of coal in 2008. The mine's air quality permit allows for the mining of up to 42 million tons per year. The Antelope mine had approximately 358 million tons of proven and probable reserves at December 31, 2007. Without the addition of more coal reserves, the current reserves will sustain current production levels until 2016 before annual output starts to significantly decrease. In 2008, we acquired control over surface rights over land covering an estimated 1 billion tons of coal near the Antelope mine, although we have not yet determined the amount of coal that can be economically mined on this land. Having control over surface rights over this land will assist us in adding federal coal tonnage in areas adjacent to the mine's existing operations. As a result, if we are successful in acquiring LBAs to mine this land, we could be in a position to extend Antelope's mine life at a lower operational cost compared to developing coal reserves in areas that are not in close proximity to the mine's existing operations. We have nominated as an LBA, subject to authorization by the BLM, a large coal tract adjacent to our existing operation. As applied for, we estimated that this tract contains approximately 464 million tons of non-reserve coal deposits, and we currently anticipate that the BLM will hold a lease sale of this LBA tract in late 2009. The final boundaries of, and the coal tonnage for, these tracts will be determined by the BLM. Acquisition of this tract would also facilitate access to approximately 81 million tons of non-reserve coal deposits that we control. Other potential large areas of unleased coal are available for nomination by us or other mining operations or persons north and west of the mine. We ship coal from the Antelope mine on the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad and the Union Pacific Railroad.

        The Cordero Rojo mine, located approximately 25 miles south of Gillette, Wyoming, extracts steam coal from the Wyodak Seam, which ranges from approximately 60 to 90 feet in thickness, using the dragline and truck-and-shovel methods. The Cordero Rojo mine shipped 40.5 million tons of coal in 2007 with an as delivered estimated average heat value of approximately 8,435 Btu, ash content of 5.5% and sulfur content of 0.3% (0.7 lbs SO2/mmBtu). We estimate it will produce approximately 40 million tons of coal in 2008. The Cordero Rojo mine had approximately 266 million tons of proven and probable reserves at December 31, 2007, and in April 2008, we acquired the South Maysdorf LBA tract, adjacent to the Cordero Rojo mine, which the BLM estimates to contain approximately 288 million tons of non-reserve coal deposits. The BLM issued the lease for this coal on August 1, 2008. Based on our reserve estimates as of December 31, 2007, the mine could sustain current production levels until 2013 before annual output starts to significantly decrease. If the South Maysdorf LBA tract is added to our mining permit, however, we expect that the operation can sustain current production levels until 2019 before annual output starts to significantly decrease. The mine's air quality permit allows for the mining of coal at a rate of up to 65 million tons per year. We have nominated two additional LBAs adjacent to Cordero Rojo leases. The North Maysdorf tract is estimated to contain approximately 55 million tons of non-reserve coal deposits, as estimated by the BLM, and the South Maysdorf II tract is estimated to contain approximately 483 million tons of non-reserve coal deposits, as applied for based on our estimates. The final boundaries of, and the coal tonnage for, these tracts will be determined by the BLM. We expect that the BLM will offer the North Maysdorf tract for lease sale in early 2009. Significant areas of unleased coal are potentially available for nomination by us or other mining operations or persons adjacent to our current operations. We ship coal from the Cordero Rojo mine on the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad and the Union Pacific Railroad.

113


Table of Contents

        The Jacobs Ranch mine, located approximately 55 miles south of Gillette, Wyoming, extracts steam coal from the Upper Wyodak, Middle Wyodak and Lower Wyodak Seams, using the dragline and truck-and-shovel methods. Two products are produced from the Jacobs Ranch mine, a higher sulfur product (2.1 lbs SO2/mmBtu) and a lower sulfur product (0.9 lbs SO2/mmBtu). The sulfur dioxide content of the overall reserves and shipped products from the mine, however, average less than 1.2 pounds of sulfur dioxide/mmBtu. The Upper Wyodak Seam ranges in thickness from 6 to 14 feet. The Middle Wyodak Seam ranges in thickness from 30 to 65 feet in areas where the Lower Wyodak Seam combines with the Middle Wyodak. The Jacobs Ranch mine shipped 38.1 million tons of coal in 2007 with an estimated average as delivered heat value of approximately 8,745 Btu, ash content of 5.4% and sulfur content of 0.45% (1.0 lbs SO2/mmBtu). We estimate it will produce approximately 42 million tons of coal in 2008. The mine's air quality permit allows for the mining of coal at a rate of 55 million tons per year. Coal from Jacobs Ranch can be stored in seven separate loading silos, and the differing coals from the two seams can be blended to meet individual customer requirements. The Jacobs Ranch mine had approximately 423 million tons of proven and probable reserves at December 31, 2007. Without the addition of more coal reserves, the current reserves will sustain current production levels until 2017 before annual output starts to significantly decrease. Four large coal tracts have been nominated as LBAs by us and another coal company for leasing near the mine. We have applied for the West Jacobs LBA and estimate that it contains approximately 844 million tons of non-reserve coal. The final boundaries of, and the coal tonnage for, these tracts will be determined by the BLM. Other large areas of unleased coal are available for nomination by us or other mining operations or persons to the north and west of the mine. We ship coal from the Jacobs Ranch mine on the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad and the Union Pacific Railroad.

        The Spring Creek mine, located in Montana approximately 35 miles north of Sheridan, Wyoming, extracts steam coal from the Anderson-Dietz Seam, which averages approximately 80 feet in thickness, using the dragline and truck-and-shovel methods. Spring Creek shipped 15.7 million tons of coal in 2007 with an estimated average as delivered heat value of approximately 9,100 Btu, ash content of 6.0% and sulfur content of 0.3% (0.7 lbs SO2/mmBtu). We estimate it will produce approximately 17 million tons of coal in 2008. Ash from Spring Creek coal contains an average of approximately 8% sodium oxide. Earthen materials are selectively blended with Spring Creek coal within the crushing facility to reduce the post-combustion sodium level and enable the production of a range of products tailored for customers requiring lower sodium levels. Recent interest from foreign buyers in coal from our Spring Creek mine is increasing. The mine's air quality permit allows for the mining of coal at a rate of up to 20 million tons per year. Spring Creek mine had approximately 325 million tons of proven and probable reserves at December 31, 2007. Without the addition of more coal reserves, the current reserves will sustain current production levels until 2026 before annual output starts to significantly decrease. The BLM is currently reviewing a lease modification proposal by us containing approximately 36 million tons of non-reserve coal deposits according to our estimates. We are in the process of expanding Spring Creek's permitted mining capacity to above 20 million tons per year. We ship coal from the Spring Creek mine on the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad. The location of the mine relative to the Great Lakes is attractive to our customers in the northeast because of lower transportation costs. The location of the Spring Creek mine also provides access to the Westshore terminal near Vancouver, Canada, which is the main export terminal from the western U.S., providing an advantage relative to other PRB mines.

        The Decker mine is located immediately to the southeast of Spring Creek in Big Horn County, Montana. We acquired a 50% interest in the Decker mine in connection with the NERCO acquisition

114


Table of Contents

in 1993. A third-party mine operator manages the Decker mine for us and our joint venture partner and markets the steam coal out of the Decker mine. There are two principal seams at West Decker, Dietz 1 and Dietz 2, with typical thicknesses of 51 and 16 feet, respectively, and two seams at East Decker, Dietz 1 Upper and Dietz 1 Lower, with typical thicknesses of 27 and 17 feet, respectively. Mining is by dragline and truck-and-shovel methods. Decker shipped approximately 7 million tons of coal in 2007 with an estimated average as delivered heat value of approximately 9,500 Btu, ash content of 4.25% and sulfur content of 0.3% (0.7 lbs SO2/mmBtu). We estimate it will produce approximately 3.1 million tons of coal in 2008, based on our 50% interest. Decker had approximately 13.2 million tons of proven and probable reserves as of December 31, 2007, of which approximately 6.6 million reflects our 50% interest. The mine's air quality permit allows for the mining of coal at a rate of up to 16 million tons per year. Without the addition of more coal reserves, the current reserves will sustain current production levels until 2010 before annual output starts to significantly decrease. Currently, the Decker management committee has approved plans to reduce mining rates and close the Decker mine at the end of 2012. However, Decker is currently reviewing the possibility of extending its operations by mining a portion of its 23.8 million tons of non-reserve coal deposits, based on our 50% interest, including in the eastern area of the operation. Coal from the Decker mine is shipped on the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad and, like Spring Creek, is also well positioned for access to the export markets.

        Under the terms of our joint-venture agreement, a third-party mine operator manages the day-to-day operations of the Decker mine. The Decker mine is a unionized operation. None of our employees work at the Decker mine. Although we do not manage day-to-day operations at the Decker mine, we are a member and have equal representation with Level 3 on the management committee that is responsible for the executive supervision, control and management of the business. The management committee approves decisions regarding the further development of the mine, construction of improvements, mining operations, reclamation plans, acquisition of equipment or property or sales or other dispositions of coal and establishes guidelines and procedures for the third-party mine operator to operate the Decker mine.

        Through our wholly-owned subsidiary, we have a 50% interest in the assets and liabilities of the Decker mine. We share the profits, operating expenses, reclamation obligations and liabilities and assets associated with the Decker mine equally with Level 3. Through our participation in the management committee, we approve the budget for the Decker mine. Under the terms of the joint venture agreement we are required to contribute cash or other property and equipment as may be necessary to operate the business. While capital contributions to the Decker joint venture have historically been made at the discretion of the management committee, under the terms of the joint venture agreement we may be required to contribute our proportional share of funds to carry on the business of the joint venture or to cover liabilities. In the event that either joint venture partner does not contribute its share of operating expenses, including reclamation expenses when due, or other liabilities, the other partner is not required to assume their obligation, but may have joint and several liability as a matter of law. In addition, if we do not provide our proportional share or our joint venturer does provide its proportional share, our interest in the profits from the Decker mine will be adjusted proportionally until such time as the contributions among us and our joint venture partner become equal. Each joint venture partner has a first right of refusal to purchase the other partner's interest in the mine prior to a sale for cash by that partner to an unaffiliated third party.

Reclamation

        Pursuant to the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act, or SMCRA, mine operators must reclaim and restore all mining properties, whether federally, state or privately leased, after mining has been completed. Before a SMCRA permit is issued, a mine operator must submit a bond or otherwise secure the performance of all reclamation obligations. We typically secure our obligations through surety bonds and/or letters of credit issued for the benefit of the relevant government agency. While we

115


Table of Contents


were a part of the Rio Tinto Group, Rio Tinto typically served as guarantor of our surety bonds. Our letters of credit were generally issued under Rio Tinto's pre-existing credit facilities on our behalf, though we have in some instances entered into separate letter of credit arrangements with banks, such as arrangements with respect to the reclamation obligations of the Decker mine. As of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, there were approximately $713.8 million and $721.4 million, respectively, in surety bonds (including our obligations with respect to the Decker mine) and letters of credit pledged to secure the performance of our reclamation obligations (including $103.6 million as of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, with respect to Colowyo and other non-coal businesses). In connection with this offering, we intend to refinance these outstanding surety bonds and letters of credit. We also intend to complete the required reclamation activities in a timely and professional manner to cause the bonds to be released and to minimize our environmental impact. As of October 1, 2008, a total of 535 acres of final reclamation has been released from reclamation bonding requirements at the Cordero Rojo and Jacobs Ranch mines and approximately 8,400 acres are in various phases of reclamation bond release. Excluding Decker, we had 30,838 acres covered by bonds, including approximately 2,100 acres for which we have applied for final reclamation bond release. See "Environmental and Other Regulatory Matters."

Coal Reserves

        Our reserve estimates as of December 31, 2007 were prepared by our staff of geologists and engineers, who have extensive experience in PRB coal. These individuals are responsible for collecting and analyzing geologic data within and adjacent to leases controlled by us.

        While we were a part of the Rio Tinto Group, our coal reserve reporting process was reviewed by Rio Tinto. A review of our 2007 resources and reserves assessments was completed in April and August 2008 by John T. Boyd Company, mining and geological consultants, and covered our reserves as of December 31, 2007. The results verified our reserve estimates, with minor adjustments. Our reserve base of approximately 1.4 billion tons for the year ended December 31, 2007 was confirmed by John T. Boyd Company, including approximately 104 million tons of non-reserve coal deposits we held as of December 31, 2007. This does not include the recently acquired LBA tonnage of 288 million tons of non-reserve coal deposits.

        Our coal reserve estimates are based on data obtained from our drilling activities and other available geologic data. All of our reserves are assigned, associated with our active coal properties, and incorporated in detailed mine plans. Estimates of our reserves are based on an excess of 10,500 drill holes. Our proven reserves have a typical drill hole spacing of 1,500 feet or less, and our probable reserves have a typical drill hole spacing of 2,500 feet or less.

        Along with the geological data we assemble for our coal reserve estimates, our staff of geologists and engineers also analyzes the economic data such as cost of production, projected sales price as well as other data concerning permitting and advances in mining technology. Various factors and assumptions are utilized in estimating coal reserves, including assumptions concerning future coal prices and operating costs, including for critical supplies. See "Risk Factors—Inaccuracies in our estimates of our coal reserves could result in decreased profitability from lower than expected revenues or higher than expected costs." These estimates are periodically updated to reflect past coal production and other geologic or mining data. Acquisitions or sales of coal properties will also change these estimates. Changes in mining methods or the utilization of new technologies may increase or decrease the recovery basis for a coal seam. We maintain reserve information in secure computerized databases, as well as in hard copy.

        As of September 30, 2008, we controlled approximately 1.7 billion tons of coal, consisting of approximately 1.4 billion tons of proven and probable coal reserves and approximately 104 million tons

116


Table of Contents

of non-reserve coal deposits as of December 31, 2007, and approximately 288 million tons of non-reserve coal deposits, according to BLM estimates, that we acquired in April 2008. All of our proven and probable reserves are classified as steam coal. The following tables show certain reserve and non-reserve information as of December 31, 2007, unless otherwise indicated:

 
  Proven &
Probable
Reserves as of
December 31,
2007(1)(2)(3)
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
   
   
   
   
  Reserves
Leased—
Federal(9)(10)
  Reserves
Leased—
State(9)(10)
   
   
 
 
  Assigned
Reserves(4)
  Average
Btu per
Lb(5)
  Average
Sulfur
Content
  Average
Sulfur
Content(6)
  Other(9)(10)  
Mine
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
  (nearest
million)

  (%)
   
  (%)
  (lbs
SO2/mmBtu)

  (%)
  Acreage
  (%)
  Acreage
  (%)
  Acreage
 

Antelope

    358     100     8,850     0.24     0.54     99     10,171     1     640     0     0  

Cordero Rojo

    266     100     8,400     0.30     0.71     77     10,629     18     640     5     1,480  

Decker(8)

    7     100     9,500     0.39     0.82     87     *(7 )   *(7 )   *(7 )   *(7 )   *(7 )

Jacobs Ranch

    423     100     8,750     0.43     0.98     100     6,691     0     0     0     0  

Spring Creek

    325     100     9,350     0.33     0.71     62     3,773     37     1,120     1     320  
                                                       

Total

    1,378                             87     31,264     12     2,400     1     1,800  
                                                       

(1)
Reserves—That part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. We market our product on a raw (unwashed) basis and the recoverable tonnage we report is equivalent to the saleable tonnage.

(2)
Proven Reserves—Reserves for which (i) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed samplings and (ii) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well-established.

(3)
Probable Reserves—Reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling, and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.

(4)
Assigned Reserves—Reserves that are committed to our surface mine operations with operating mining equipment and plant facilities. All our reported reserves are considered to be assigned.

(5)
Average Btu per pound includes weight of moisture in the coal on an as-sold basis.

(6)
Compliance coal is coal which, when combusted, emits no greater than 1.2 pounds of sulfur dioxide/mmBtu in accordance with the standards established by the Clean Air Act. The average sulfur content of the reserve for each our operations is less than 1.2 lbs of sulfur dioxide per million Btu and is considered to be compliance coal. However, approximately 17% of the reserves for the Jacobs Ranch Mine mined from the Upper Wyodak seam produce sulfur emissions above the limits for compliance coal.

(7)
Decker reports its reserves to us based on the following breakout between leased and private reserves: 87% of the reserves are leased from the federal government, with the remaining reserves leased by the State of Montana or under private ownership.

(8)
Based on our 50% interest in our Decker mine.

(9)
Antelope contains the following leases: Federal Coal Lease WYW-151643, Federal Coal Lease WYW-141435, Federal Coal Lease WYW-0321780, Federal Coal Lease WYW 0322255, State of Wyoming Coal Lease No. 0-22695

Cordero Rojo contains the following leases: Federal Coal Lease WYW-8385, Federal Coal Lease WYW-23929, State of Wyoming Lease No. 0-26936-A.

Jacobs Ranch contains the following leases: Federal Coal Lease WYW-117924, Federal Coal Lease WYW-146744.

Spring Creek contains the following leases: Federal Coal Lease MTM-88405, Federal Coal Lease MTM 069782, Federal Coal Lease MTM-94378, State of Montana Coal Lease No. C-1101-00, State of Montana Coal Lease No. C-1099-00, State of Montana Coal Lease No. C-1100-00, State of Montana Coal Lease No. C-1088-05, and one private lease.

(10)
The calculation of the percentages shown is based on our reserve estimates as of October 31, 2007 and is adjusted to reflect the percentages as of December 31, 2007 by subtracting estimated production from October 31, 2007 to December 31, 2007.

117


Table of Contents

Non-Reserve Coal Deposits(1)
  Million Tons   Average
Btu per lb(2)
  Average
Sulfur
Content
  Average
Sulfur
Content(3)
  Ownership
 
   
   
  (%)
  (lbs SO2/mmBtu)
   

Cordero Rojo-South Maysdorf LBA acquired in April 2008 (tons according to BLM estimates)

    288     8,404     0.29     0.69   Federal lease

Antelope (as of December 31, 2007)

    81     8,987     0.23     0.51   State lease

Decker (as of December 31, 2007)(4)

    24     9,436     0.54     1.14   Federal lease

(1)
Non-reserve Coal Deposits—Coal bearing bodies that have been sufficiently sampled and analyzed in trenches, outcrops, drilling, and underground workings to assume continuity between sample points, and therefore warrant further exploration work. However, this coal does not qualify as proven or probable coal reserves as prescribed by SEC standards until a final comprehensive evaluation based on unit cost per ton, recoverability, and other material factors concludes legal and economic feasibility. Non-reserve coal deposits may be classified as such by either limited property control or geologic limitation, or both.

(2)
Average Btu per pound includes weight of moisture in the coal on an as-sold basis.

(3)
The average sulfur content for these non-reserve coal deposits is less than 1.2 lbs of sulfur dioxide per million Btu and is considered to be compliance coal. Although the average sulfur content of our non-reserve coal deposits at the Decker mine is less than 1.2 lbs. of sulfur dioxide per million Btu, some of our non-reserve coal deposits at the Decker mine may not be considered compliance coal.

(4)
Based on our 50% interest in our Decker mine.

        Since our inception, we have focused on growth through, among other things, the federal competitive leasing process, including the LBA process, and we continue to identify federal coal leasing opportunities. For example, in 2007 we acquired 107.5 million tons of reserves in an LBA for our Spring Creek mine. In addition, in April 2008 we acquired the South Maysdorf LBA tract, adjacent to the Cordero Rojo mine and were subsequently awarded the lease on August 1, 2008. The BLM estimates that this tract contains about 288 million tons of non-reserve coal deposits, with a heat value of 8,404 Btu and sulfur content of 0.29%. As part of our reserve report process we will assess the nature of these non-reserve coal deposits.

Coal Mining Methods

Surface Mining

        All of our mines are surface mining operations utilizing both dragline and truck/shovel mining methods. Surface mining is used when coal is found relatively close to the surface. Surface mining typically involves the removal of topsoil, and drilling and blasting the overburden (earth and rock covering the coal) with explosives. The overburden is then removed with draglines. Trucks, shovels and dozers then remove the coal. The final step involves replacing the overburden and topsoil after the coal has been excavated, reestablishing vegetation and plant life into the natural habitat and making other changes designed to provide local community benefits. We typically recover 90% or more of the coal seam through surface mining.

118


Table of Contents

Coal Preparation and Blending

        Depending on coal quality and customer requirements, in almost all cases the coal from our mines is crushed and shipped directly from our mines to the customer. Typically, no other preparation is needed for a saleable product. However, depending on the specific quality characteristics of the coal and the needs of the customer, blending different types of coals may be required at the customer's plant. Coals of various sulfur and ash contents can be mixed or "blended" to meet the specific combustion and environmental needs of customers.

        All of our coal can be blended with coal from other coal producers. Spring Creek's location and the high Btu content of its coal make its coal better suited than our other products, for export and transportation to the eastern U.S. coal markets for blending by the customer with coal sourced from other markets to achieve a suitable overall product. At our Jacobs Ranch mine, we continue to segregate and sell separately a small volume of higher sulfur coals produced to lower the sulfur content in the main product we sell.

Coal Characteristics

        In general, coal of all geological compositions is characterized by end use. Heat value and sulfur content are the most important variables in the profitable marketing and transportation of steam coal. We mine, process and market low sulfur content, sub-bituminous steam coal, the characteristics of which are described below. Because we operate in the PRB, which does not have metallurgical coal, we only produce steam coal.

        The heat value of coal is commonly measured in British thermal units, or "Btus." A Btu is the amount of heat needed to raise the temperature of one pound of water by one degree Fahrenheit. Sub-bituminous coal from the PRB has a typical heat value that ranges from 8,000 to 9,500 Btus. Sub-bituminous coal from the PRB is used primarily by electric utilities and by some industrial customers for steam generation. Coal found in other regions in the U.S., including the eastern and midwestern regions, tends to have a higher heat value than coal found in the PRB.

        Federal and state environmental regulations, including regulations that limit the amount of sulfur dioxide that may be emitted as a result of combustion, have affected and may continue to affect the demand for certain types of coal. The sulfur content of coal can vary from seam to seam and within a single seam. The chemical composition and concentration of sulfur in coal affects the amount of sulfur dioxide produced in combustion. Coal-fired power plants can comply with sulfur dioxide emissions regulations by burning coal with low sulfur content, blending coals with various sulfur contents, purchasing emission allowances on the open market and/or using sulfur-reduction technology.

        "Compliance coal" is coal that when combusted emits no greater than 1.2 pounds of sulfur dioxide per million Btus and requires no blending or sulfur-reduction technology to comply with current sulfur dioxide emissions standards of the Clean Air Act. PRB coal typically has a lower sulfur content than eastern U.S. coal and generally emits no greater than 0.8 pounds of sulfur dioxide per million Btus. Almost all of our reserves are compliance coal.

        Higher sulfur noncompliance coal can be burned in plants equipped with sulfur-reduction technology, such as scrubbers, which can reduce sulfur dioxide emissions by up to 90%, and in facilities that blend compliance and noncompliance coal. In 2007, out of utilities with a coal generating capacity of approximately 310 GW, utilities accounting for a capacity of over 99 GW had been retrofitted with scrubbers. Furthermore, all new coal-fired generation plants built in the U.S. are expected to use some

119


Table of Contents


type of sulfur-reduction technology. The market for the higher sulfur coal product at our Jacobs Ranch Mine may improve as the implementation of sulfur-reduction technology becomes more prevalent. However, the demand for lower sulfur coal may decrease with widespread implementation of sulfur-reduction technology.

        Ash is the inorganic residue remaining after the combustion of coal. As with sulfur content, ash content varies from seam to seam. Ash content is an important characteristic of coal because it impacts boiler performance and electric generating plants must handle and dispose of ash following combustion. The ash content of PRB coals is generally low, representing approximately 5% to 10% by weight. The composition of the ash, including the proportion of sodium oxide, as well as the ash and fusion temperatures are important characteristics of coal and help determine the suitability of the coal to end users. In limited cases, customer requirements at the Spring Creek mine have required, and may continue to require, addition of earthen materials to dilute the sodium oxide and ash of the coal.

        Moisture content of coal varies by the type of coal and the region where it is mined. In general, high moisture content is associated with lower heat values and generally makes the coal more expensive to transport. Moisture content in coal, on an as-sold basis, can range from approximately 2% to over 30% of the coal's weight. PRB coals have typical moisture content of 25% to 35%.

        Trace elements within coal that are of primary concern are mercury, for health and environmental reasons, and chlorine, for utility plant performance. Trace elements of mercury and chlorine in PRB coal are relatively low compared to other coal regions. However, the low chlorine content of PRB coal is associated with the emission of elemental mercury, which is difficult to remove with conventional pollution control devices.

Reserve Acquisition Process

        We acquire a significant portion of our coal through the LBA process and as a result substantially all of our coal is held under federal leases. Under this process, before a mining company can obtain new federal coal, the company must nominate a coal tract for lease and then win the lease through a competitive bidding process. The LBA process can last anywhere from two to five years from the time the coal tract is nominated to the time a final bid is accepted by the BLM. After the LBA is awarded, the company then conducts the necessary testing to determine what amount can be classified as reserves.

        To initiate the LBA process, companies wanting to acquire additional coal must file an application with the BLM's state office indicating interest in a specific coal tract. The BLM reviews the initial application to determine whether the application conforms to existing land-use plans for that particular tract of land and that the application would provide for maximum coal recovery. The application is further reviewed by a regional coal team at a public meeting. Based on a review of the available information and public comment, the regional coal team will make a recommendation to the BLM whether to continue, modify or reject the application.

        If the BLM determines to continue the application, the company that submitted the application will pay for a BLM-directed environmental analysis or an environmental impact statement to be completed. This analysis or impact statement is subject to publication and public comment. The BLM may consult with other government agencies during this process, including state and federal agencies, surface management agencies, Native American tribes or bands, the U.S. Department of Justice, or others as needed. The public comment period for an analysis or impact statement typically occurs over a 60-day period.

120


Table of Contents

        After the environmental analysis or environmental impact statement has been issued and a recommendation has been published that supports the lease sale of the LBA tract, the BLM schedules a public competitive lease sale. The BLM prepares an internal estimate of the fair market value of the coal that is based on its economic analysis and comparable sales analysis. Prior to the lease sale, companies interested in acquiring the lease must send sealed bids to the BLM. The bid amounts for the lease are payable in five annual installments, with the first 20% installment due when the mining operator submits its initial bid for an LBA. Before the lease is approved by the BLM, the company must first furnish to the BLM an initial rental payment for the first year of rent along with either a bond for the next 20% annual installment payment for the bid amount, or an application for history of timely payment, in which case the BLM may waive the bond requirement if the company successfully meets all the qualifications of a timely payor. The bids are opened at the lease sale. If the BLM decides to grant a lease, the lease is awarded to the company that submitted the highest total bid meeting or exceeding the BLM's fair market value estimate, which is not published. The BLM, however, is not required to grant a lease even if it determines that a bid meeting or exceeding the fair market value of the coal has been submitted. The winning bidder must also submit a report setting forth the nature and extent of its coal holdings to the U.S. Department of Justice for a 30-day antitrust review of the lease. If the successful bidder was not the initial applicant, the BLM will refund the initial applicant certain fees it paid in connection with the application process, for example the fees associated with the environmental analysis or environmental impact statement, and the winning bidder will bear those costs. Coal won through the LBA process and subject to federal leases are administered by the U.S. Department of Interior under the Federal Coal Leasing Amendment Act of 1976. In addition, we occasionally add small coal tracts adjacent to our existing LBAs through an agreed upon lease modification with the BLM. Once the BLM has issued a lease, the company must also complete the permitting process before it can mine the coal. See "Environmental and Other Regulatory Matters."

        Each of our federal coal leases has an initial term of 20 years, renewable for subsequent 10-year periods and for so long thereafter as coal is produced in commercial quantities. The lease requires diligent development within the first ten years of the lease award with a required coal extraction of 1.0% of the total coal under the lease by the end of that 10-year period. At the end of the 10-year development period, the lessee is required to maintain continuous operations, as defined in the applicable leasing regulations. In certain cases a lessee may combine contiguous leases into a logical mining unit, or LMU. This allows the production of coal from any of the leases within the LMU to be used to meet the continuous operation requirements for the entire LMU. We currently have LMUs for our Antelope and Jacobs Ranch mines. We pay to the federal government an annual rent of $3.00 per acre and production royalties of 12.5% of gross revenues on surface mined coal. The federal government remits approximately 50% of the production royalty payments to the state after deducting administrative expenses. Some of our mines are also subject to coal leases with the states of Montana or Wyoming, as applicable, and have different terms and conditions that we must adhere to in a similar way to our federal leases. Under these federal and state leases, if the leased coal is not diligently developed during the initial 10-year development period or if certain other terms of the leases are not complied with, including the requirement to produce a minimum quantity of coal or pay a minimum production royalty, if applicable, the BLM or the applicable state regulatory agency can terminate the lease prior to the expiration of its term.

        Most of the coal we lease from the United States comes from "split estate" lands in which the federal government owns the coal and a private party owns the surface. In order to mine the coal we acquire through the LBA process, we must also acquire rights to mine from the owners of the surface lands overlying the coal. Certain federal regulations provide a specific class of surface owners, Qualified Surface Owners, or QSOs, with the ability to prohibit the BLM from leasing its coal. If the land overlying a coal tract is owned by a QSO, federal laws prohibit us from leasing the coal tract without first securing surface rights to the land, or purchasing the surface rights from the QSO, which would allow us to conduct our mining operations. This right of QSOs allows them to exercise significant

121


Table of Contents


influence over negotiations and prices to acquire surface rights and can delay the LBA process or ultimately prevent the acquisition of the LBA over that land entirely. There are QSOs that own land adjacent to or near our existing mines that may be attractive acquisition candidates for us. Typically, we seek to purchase the land overlying our coal or enter into option agreements granting us an option to purchase the land upon acquiring an LBA. In some instances, however, we enter into separate lease arrangements with surface owners allowing us to conduct our mining operations on the land. We own substantially all of the land over our reserves.

        We also enter into leases with other third parties from time to time. The majority of these third party leases have a term that continues until the exhaustion of the "mineable and merchantable" coal in the lease area. Some of our leases extend for a specific number of years rather than to the exhaustion of the particular mine's reserves, but in all these cases, we believe that the term of years will allow the recoverable reserve to be fully extracted in accordance with our projected mine plan. Consistent with industry practice, we conduct only limited investigations of title to our coal properties prior to leasing. Title to properties leased from private third parties is not usually fully verified until we make a commitment to develop a property, which may not occur until we have obtained the necessary permits and completed exploration of the property. See "Risk Factors—If we were unable to acquire or develop additional coal reserves that are economically recoverable, our profitability and future success and growth may be materially adversely affected."

Customers and Coal Contracts

        Our primary customers are domestic utility companies with over 140 domestic plants primarily located in the mid-west and south central U.S. Our coal supplies fuel approximately 6% of the electricity generated in the U.S. As of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, approximately 44% and 49% of our revenues, respectively, were derived from our top ten customers during those periods. No customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenues in 2007. The following map shows the percentage of our shipped coal by state of destination during 2007, excluding Decker.

GRAPHIC

122


Table of Contents

        See Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this prospectus for additional information related to our revenues derived from foreign customers.

Long-term Coal Sales Agreements

        As is customary in the coal industry, we enter into fixed price, fixed volume supply contracts of one- to five-year term with many of our customers. Multiple year contracts usually have specific and possibly different volume and pricing arrangements for each year of the contract. As of December 31, 2007, approximately 61% of our committed tons were associated with contracts that had three years or more remaining on their term. Most of our supply contracts include a fixed price for the term of the agreement or a pre-determined escalation in price for each year. Some of our agreements that extend for a four- or five-year term or longer may include a variable pricing system. These contracts allow customers to secure a supply for their future needs and provides us with greater predictability of sales volume and sales price. For the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, approximately 92.3% and 97.3%, respectively, of our revenues were derived from long-term supply contracts with a term of one year or greater. While most of our sales contracts are for terms of one to five years, some are as short as one to six months and other contracts have terms longer than ten years.

        As of June 30, 2008, we had sales commitments of 362.3 million tons through 2010. We have agreed to sell all of our planned 2008 production. As of June 30, 2008, approximately 9% and 30% of our estimated production of approximately 137.6 million tons and 140.6 million tons for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively, remain unsold.

        Our coal is primarily sold on a mine-specific basis to utility customers through the Request-for-Proposal process. The terms of our coal sales agreements result from competitive bidding and extensive negotiations with customers. Consequently, the terms of these contracts vary by customer, including base price adjustment features, price reopener terms, coal quality requirements, quantity parameters, permitted sources of supply, future regulatory changes, extension options, force majeure, termination and assignment provisions.

        Our supply contracts contain provisions to adjust the base price due to new statutes, ordinances or regulations that affect our costs related to performance of the agreement. Additionally, some of our contracts contain provisions that allow for the recovery of costs affected by modifications or changes in the interpretations or application of any applicable statute by local, state or federal government authorities. These provisions only apply to the base price of coal contained in these supply contracts. In some circumstances, a significant adjustment in base price can lead to termination of the contract.

        Price re-opener and index provisions, which can be either renegotiated or based on a fixed formula, are present in contracts covering approximately 25% of our tonnage commitments in 2008 and beyond. These provisions may allow either party to commence a renegotiation of the contract price at a pre-determined time. Price re-opener provisions may automatically set a new price based on prevailing market price or, in some instances, require us to negotiate a new price, sometimes between a specified range of prices. In a limited number of agreements, if the parties do not agree on a new price, either party has an option to terminate the contract. Under some of our contracts, we have the right to match lower prices offered to our customers by other suppliers. In addition, many of our contracts contain clauses which in some cases may allow customers to terminate the contract in the event of certain changes in environmental laws and regulations.

        Quality and volumes for the coal are stipulated in coal sales agreements. In most cases, the annual pricing and volume obligations are fixed although in some cases the volume specified may vary depending on the quality of the coal. In a relatively small number of contracts, customers are allowed to vary the amount of coal taken under the contract. Most of our coal sales agreements contain provisions requiring us to deliver coal within certain ranges for specific coal characteristics such as heat

123


Table of Contents


content, sulfur, ash and ash fusion temperature. Failure to meet these specifications can result in economic penalties, suspension or cancellation of shipments or termination of the contracts.

        Our coal sales agreements also typically contain force majeure provisions allowing temporary suspension of performance by us, or our customers during the duration of specified events beyond the control of the affected party, including events such as strikes, adverse mining conditions, mine closures or serious transportation problems that affect us or unanticipated plant outages that may affect the buyer. Our contracts generally provide that in the event a force majeure circumstance exceeds a certain time period (e.g., 60-90 days) the unaffected party may have the option to terminate the sale in whole or in part. Some contracts stipulate that this tonnage can be made up by mutual agreement or at the discretion of the buyer. Agreements between our customers and the railroads servicing our mines may also contain force majeure provisions. Generally, our coal sales agreements allow our customer to suspend performance in the event that the railroad fails to provide its services due to circumstances that would constitute a force majeure.

        In some of our contracts, we have a right of substitution, allowing us to provide coal from different mines, including third-party mines, as long as the replacement coal meets quality specifications and will be sold at the same delivered cost.

        Generally, under the terms of our coal supply contracts, we agree to indemnify or reimburse our customers for damage to their or their rail carrier's equipment while on our property, other than from their own negligence, and for damage to our customer's equipment due to non-coal materials being included with our coal before leaving our property.

        From time to time, we purchase coal through brokers to cover any shortfalls under our supply agreements and sell to brokers any excess produced coal.

        Our Spring Creek mine is a party to a broker sales contract under which Spring Creek has agreed to sell purchased coal to a wholesale power generation company. Under this contract we sell approximately 6.8 million tons per year. Final deliveries are expected to be made under the contract in the first quarter of 2010, at which time we expect the contract to expire.

        For delivery for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, we purchased 6.3 million tons and 3.0 million tons, respectively, through brokers. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

Sales and Marketing

        Our sales and marketing department is divided into three teams:

As of October 1, 2008, we had 15 employees in our sales and marketing department.

Transportation

        Transportation can be a large component of a purchaser's total cost. Coal used for domestic consumption is generally sold free on board (fob) at the mine or nearest loading facility and the purchaser of the coal normally bears the transportation costs and risk of loss in the event of a problem.

124


Table of Contents


Most electric generators arrange long-term shipping contracts with rail or barge companies to assure stable delivery costs. Our mines are served by the BNSF and UP rails. See "The Coal Industry—Transportation" for a more detailed discussion of the railroads that service our mines.

Suppliers

        Principal supplies used in our business include petroleum-based fuels, explosives, tires, steel and other raw materials as well as spare parts and other consumables used in the mining process. We use third-party suppliers for a significant portion of our equipment rebuilds and repairs, drilling services and construction. We use sole source suppliers for certain parts of our business such as dragline shovel parts and services and tires. We believe adequate substitute suppliers are available. For further discussion of our suppliers, see "Risk Factors—Increases in the costs of raw materials and other industrial supplies, or the inability to obtain a sufficient quantity of those supplies, could increase our operating expenses, disrupt or delay our production and materially and adversely affect our profitability."

        We have historically relied on various Rio Tinto Group supply contracts to obtain some of our raw materials and consumables. Upon completion of this offering, we will no longer be a party to the Rio Tinto Group supply contracts. While some of our supplies and equipment will be delivered under purchase orders entered into prior to termination, including certain heavy mobile equipment and tires, we expect to enter into new supply contracts prior to the completion of this offering to replace the Rio Tinto Group supply contracts.

Competition

        The coal industry is highly competitive. We compete directly with all coal producers and indirectly with other energy producers throughout the U.S. The most important factors on which we compete with other coal producers are coal price, coal quality and characteristics, transportation costs, customer service and the reliability of supply. Demand for coal and the prices that we will be able to obtain for our coal are closely linked to coal consumption patterns of the domestic electric generation industry and international consumers. These coal consumption patterns are influenced by factors beyond our control, including the supply and demand for domestic and foreign electricity, domestic and foreign governmental regulations and taxes, environmental and other regulatory changes, technological developments and the price and availability of alternative fuels, such as natural gas and oil, and alternative energy sources, including hydroelectric, nuclear, wind and solar power.

        Because most of the coal in the vicinity of our mines is owned by the U.S. federal government, we compete with other coal producers operating in the PRB for additional coal through the LBA process. This process is competitive and we expect the competition for LBAs to remain strong.

Office Facilities

        Our corporate headquarters is currently located in Gillette, Wyoming, where we own approximately 70,000 square feet of office space. In addition, we lease approximately 7,285 square feet of additional office space in Gillette, Wyoming, under two annual leases expiring in June 30, 2009 and May 31, 2009. After this offering, our primary operating office will remain in Gillette, Wyoming, close to our mining operations, and we intend to establish a small corporate office to house certain corporate and marketing functions in the Denver, Colorado area. As of December 31, 2007, all of our long-lived assets were located in the U.S. See Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this prospectus.

125


Table of Contents

Employees

        As of October 1, 2008, we had 2,091 employees. None of our employees are currently parties to collective bargaining agreements. We hold a 50% interest in the Decker mine in Montana, which is a union-based operation operated by a third-party mine operator. However, we do not have any employees working at the Decker mine. We believe that we have good relations with our employees and since RTEA's inception we have had no history of work stoppages or successful union organizing campaigns. As of October 1, 2008, we had 477 external contractors, on a full time equivalent basis. Certain employees of an affiliate of Rio Tinto America will be providing services to us, pursuant to a Transition Services Agreement that we will enter into in connection with this offering.

Legal Proceedings

        The Minerals Management Service, or MMS, a federal agency with responsibility for collecting royalties on coal produced from federal coal leases, issued two disputed assessments against Decker Coal Company: one for coal produced from 1986-1992, and the other for coal produced from 1993-2001. Both assessments concern coal sold by Decker to Big Horn Coal Company, or Big Horn, and Black Butte Coal Company, or Black Butte, and in turn resold by those entities to Commonwealth Edison Company to satisfy requirements under long-term contracts between those entities and Commonwealth Edison. The MMS maintains that Decker's royalties should not be based on the prices at which Decker actually sold coal to Big Horn and Black Butte because MMS does not believe those prices represent the results of arm's length negotiation. MMS bases this conclusion on the facts that those entities are both affiliates of Kiewit Mining Group, Inc., which is also a 50% owner of Decker, and that the sales were contingent on Big Horn's and Black Butte's ability to resell the coal to Commonwealth Edison, which did not leave Big Horn and Black Butte at market risk. Instead, the MMS assessed Decker's royalties based on the higher prices set under Big Horn's and Black Butte's separate long-term contracts with Commonwealth Edison. With respect to the period 1986-1992, Decker appealed the assessment through the administrative process with the MMS and that appeal was unsuccessful. A further appeal is now pending before the United States District Court for the District of Montana. With respect to the period 1993-2001, the MMS has not issued a final decision concerning Decker's challenge to the assessment. As of December 31, 2007, the estimated additional assessed royalties (inclusive of interest) for the period 1986-1992 are approximately $30 million and the estimated additional assessed royalties (inclusive of interest) for the period 1993-2001 are approximately $10 million. Decker estimates that even if the assessments were to be upheld, MMS's eventual recovery would be between $0 and $40 million.

        Decker believes that it is indemnified by and/or has contractual price escalation protection from Big Horn and Black Butte with respect to any increased assessments for 1986-1992; that it has contractual price escalation protection from any increased assessments for 1993-2001; that, in addition, Commonwealth Edison has indemnified Black Butte with respect to the 1993-2001 assessments, and that in furtherance of that obligation, Commonwealth Edison or its parent company, Exelon Generation, Inc., has therefore agreed to indemnify Decker directly for such matters. If the assessments were upheld and the indemnities and/or price protections were ultimately not available to Decker, the resulting Decker liability could be material. As a result of our 50% ownership interest in Decker, our financial results could in turn be materially adversely affected.

        From time to time, we are involved in other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, certain of which are also covered by insurance. We believe that there are no other legal proceedings pending that are likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

126


Table of Contents


ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER REGULATORY MATTERS

        Federal, state and local authorities regulate the U.S. coal mining industry with respect to matters such as employee health and safety, permitting and licensing requirements, air quality standards, water pollution, plant and wildlife protection, the reclamation and restoration of mining properties after mining has been completed, the discharge of materials into the environment and the effects of mining on surface and groundwater quality and availability. These laws and regulations have had, and will continue to have, a significant effect on our production costs and our competitive position. Future laws, regulations or orders, as well as future interpretations and more rigorous enforcement of existing laws, regulations or orders, may require substantial increases in equipment and operating costs and delays, interruptions, or a termination of operations, the extent of which we cannot predict. Future laws, regulations or orders may also cause coal to become a less attractive fuel source, thereby reducing coal's share of the market for fuels and other energy sources used to generate electricity. As a result, future laws, regulations or orders may adversely affect our mining operations, cost structure or our customers' demand for coal.

        We endeavor to conduct our mining operations in compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. However, due in part to the extensive and comprehensive regulatory requirements, violations during mining operations occur from time to time. We cannot assure you that we have been or will be at all times in complete compliance with such laws and regulations.

Mining Permits and Approval

        Numerous governmental permits or approvals are required for mining operations. When we apply for these permits and approvals, we may be required to prepare and present data to federal, state or local authorities pertaining to the effect or impact that any proposed production or processing of coal may have upon the environment. For example, in order to obtain a federal coal lease, an environmental impact statement must be prepared to assist the BLM in determining the potential environmental impact of lease issuance, including any collateral effects from the mining, transportation and burning of coal. The authorization, permitting and implementation requirements imposed by federal, state and local authorities may be costly and time consuming and may delay commencement or continuation of mining operations. In the states where we operate, the applicable laws and regulations also provide that a mining permit or modification can be delayed, refused or revoked if officers, directors, shareholders with specified interests or certain other affiliated entities with specified interests in the applicant or permittee have, or are affiliated with another entity that has, outstanding permit violations. Thus, past or ongoing violations of applicable laws and regulations could provide a basis to revoke existing permits and to deny the issuance of additional permits.

        In order to obtain mining permits and approvals from federal and state regulatory authorities, mine operators must submit a reclamation plan for restoring, upon the completion of mining operations, the mined property to its prior condition, productive use or other permitted condition. Typically, we submit the necessary permit applications several months or even years before we plan to begin mining a new area. Some of our required permits are becoming increasingly difficult and expensive to obtain, and the application review processes are taking longer to complete and becoming increasingly subject to challenge.

        Under some circumstances, substantial fines and penalties, including revocation or suspension of mining permits, may be imposed under the laws described above. Monetary sanctions and, in severe circumstances, criminal sanctions may be imposed for failure to comply with these laws.

Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act

        The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act, or SMCRA, establishes mining, environmental protection, reclamation and closure standards for all aspects of surface mining. Mining operators must

127


Table of Contents


obtain SMCRA permits and permit renewals from the Office of Surface Mining, or the OSM, or from the applicable state agency if the state agency has obtained regulatory primacy. A state agency may achieve primacy if the state regulatory agency develops a mining regulatory program that is no less stringent than the federal mining regulatory program under SMCRA. Both Wyoming and Montana, where our mines are located, have achieved primacy to administer the SMCRA program.

        SMCRA permit provisions include a complex set of requirements, which include, among other things, coal prospecting, mine plan development, topsoil or growth medium removal and replacement, selective handling of overburden materials, mine pit backfilling and grading, disposal of excess spoil, protection of the hydrologic balance, surface runoff and drainage control, establishment of suitable post mining land uses and re-vegetation. We begin the process of preparing a mining permit application by collecting baseline data to adequately characterize the pre-mining environmental conditions of the permit area. This work is typically conducted by third-party consultants with specialized expertise and typically includes surveys and/or assessments of the following: cultural and historical resources, geology, soils, vegetation, aquatic organisms, wildlife, potential for threatened, endangered or other special status species, surface and ground water hydrology, climatology, riverine and riparian habitat and wetlands. The geologic data and information derived from the other surveys and/or assessments are used to develop the mining and reclamation plans presented in the permit application. The mining and reclamation plans address the provisions and performance standards of the state's equivalent SMCRA regulatory program, and are also used to support applications for other authorizations and/or permits required to conduct coal mining activities. Also included in the permit application is information used for documenting surface and mineral ownership, variance requests, access roads, bonding information, mining methods, mining phases, other agreements that may relate to coal, other minerals, oil and gas rights, water rights, permitted areas, and ownership and control information required to determine compliance with OSM's Applicant Violator System, including the mining and compliance history of officers, directors and principal owners of the entity.

        Once a permit application is prepared and submitted to the regulatory agency, it goes through an administrative completeness review and a thorough technical review. Also, before a SMCRA permit is issued, a mine operator must submit a bond or otherwise secure the performance of all reclamation obligations. After the application is submitted, a public notice or advertisement of the proposed permit is required to be given, which begins a notice period that is followed by a public comment period before a permit can be issued. It is not uncommon for a SMCRA mine permit application to take over two years to prepare and review, depending on the size and complexity of the mine, and another two years or even longer for the permit to be issued. The variability in time frame required to prepare the application and issue the permit can be attributed primarily to the various regulatory authorities' discretion in the handling of comments and objections relating to the project received from the general public and other agencies. Also, it is not uncommon for a permit to be delayed as a result of litigation related to the specific permit or another related company's permit.

        In addition to the bond requirement for an active or proposed permit, the Abandoned Mine Land Fund, which was created by SMCRA, imposes a fee on all coal produced. The proceeds of the fee are used to restore mines closed or abandoned prior to SMCRA's adoption in 1977. The current fee is $0.315 per ton of coal produced from surface mines. In 2007, we recorded $44.6 million of expense related to these reclamation fees.

Surety Bonds

        As noted above, pursuant to SMCRA, mine operators must reclaim and restore mining properties after mining has been completed. Before a SMCRA permit is issued, a mine operator must submit a bond or otherwise secure the performance of all reclamation obligations. Mine operators usually secure the performance of reclamation obligations through the use of surety bonds. The costs of these bonds have fluctuated in recent years, and the market terms of these bonds have generally become more

128


Table of Contents


unfavorable to mine operators. These changes in the terms of the bonds have been accompanied at times by a decrease in the number of companies willing to issue surety bonds. Some mine operators, including us, have therefore used letters of credit to secure the performance of a portion of our reclamation obligations. Historically, Rio Tinto served as guarantor of our surety bonds and our letters of credit were issued under Rio Tinto's pre-existing credit facilities.

        As of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, there were approximately $713.8 million and $721.4 million, respectively, in surety bonds and letters of credit outstanding to secure the performance of our reclamation obligations (including our obligations with respect to the Decker mine and $103.6 million as of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, with respect to Colowyo and other non-coal businesses).

Mine Safety and Health

        Stringent health and safety standards have been in effect since Congress enacted the Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969. The Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 significantly expanded the enforcement of safety and health standards and imposed safety and health standards on all aspects of mining operations. In addition to federal regulatory programs, all of the states in which we operate also have state programs for mine safety and health regulation and enforcement. Collectively, federal and state safety and health regulation in the coal mining industry is among the most comprehensive and pervasive systems for protection of employee health and safety affecting any segment of U.S. industry. In reaction to recent underground mine accidents, state and federal legislatures and regulatory authorities have increased scrutiny of mine safety matters and passed more stringent laws governing mining. For example, in 2006, Congress enacted the Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act, or MINER Act, which imposed additional burdens on coal operators, including, among other matters, (i) obligations related to (a) the development of new emergency response plans that address post-accident communications, tracking of miners, breathable air, lifelines, training and communication with local emergency response personnel, (b) establishing additional requirements for mine rescue teams, and (c) promptly notifying federal authorities of incidents that pose a reasonable risk of death and (ii) increased penalties for violations of the applicable federal laws and regulations. The outlook for 2008 includes a possibility that additional new federal legislation known as the S-MINER Act could be passed. Although primarily directed towards underground mining, the S-MINER Act would impose more stringent health and safety requirements and could adversely affect our mining operations. Various states also have enacted their own new laws and regulations addressing many of these same subjects. Our compliance with these or any new mine health and safety regulations could increase our mining costs.

        We have implemented various internal standards to promote employee health and safety. In addition to these internal standards, we are also Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series 18001 certified and have voluntarily implemented policies and standards in addition to those required by state or federal regulations that we consider important to the health and safety of our employees. According to MSHA, in 2007 we had the lowest employee all injury incident rate among the 5 largest U.S. coal producing companies.

        Under the Black Lung Benefits Revenue Act of 1977 and the Black Lung Benefits Reform Act of 1977, as amended in 1981, each coal mine operator must pay federal black lung benefits to claimants who are current and former employees and also make payments to a trust fund for the payment of benefits and medical expenses to claimants who last worked in the coal industry prior to January 1, 1970. The trust fund is funded by an excise tax on production of up to $1.10 per ton for deep-mined coal and up to $0.55 per ton for surface-mined coal, neither amount to exceed 4.4% of the gross sales price. The excise tax does not apply to coal shipped outside the U.S. In 2007, we recorded $48.1 million of expense (excluding Colowyo) related to this excise tax.

129


Table of Contents

Clean Air Act

        The federal Clean Air Act and comparable state laws that regulate air emissions affect coal mining operations both directly and indirectly. Direct impacts on coal mining and processing operations include Clean Air Act permitting requirements and emission control requirements relating to particulate matter, which may include controlling fugitive dust. The Clean Air Act indirectly affects coal mining operations by extensively regulating the emissions of particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury and other compounds emitted by coal-fired power plants. In addition to greenhouse gas issues discussed below, the air emissions programs that may affect our operations, directly or indirectly, include, but are not limited to, the following:

130


Table of Contents

131


Table of Contents

Climate Change

        One by-product of burning coal is carbon dioxide, which is considered a greenhouse gas and is a major source of concern with respect to climate change and global warming. In 2005, the Kyoto Protocol to the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which establishes a binding set of emission targets for greenhouse gases, became binding on all those countries that had ratified it. To date, the U.S. has refused to ratify the Kyoto Protocol. Emission targets under the Kyoto Protocol vary from country to country. If the U.S. were to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, the U.S. would be required to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 93% of 1990 levels from 2008 to 2012.

        Future regulation of greenhouse gases in the U.S. could occur pursuant to future U.S. treaty obligations, statutory or regulatory changes under the Clean Air Act, federal or state adoption of a greenhouse gas regulatory scheme, or otherwise. The U.S. Congress has considered various proposals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but to date, none have become law. In April 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Massachusetts v. EPA that the EPA has authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from automobiles and can decide against regulation only if the EPA determines that carbon dioxide does not significantly contribute to climate change and does not endanger public health or the environment. Although Massachusetts v. EPA did not involve the EPA's authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from stationary sources, such as coal-fired plants, the decision is likely to impact regulation of stationary sources. For example, a challenge in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit with respect to the EPA's decision not to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants and other stationary sources under the Clean Air Act's new source performance standards was remanded to the EPA for further consideration in light of Massachusetts v. EPA. In June 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in a public nuisance action filed by eight states (Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, and Vermont) and New York City to curb carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. The parties have filed post-argument briefs on the impact of the Massachusetts v. EPA decision, and a decision is currently pending. In response to Massachusetts v. EPA, in July 2008, the EPA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking requesting public comment on the regulation of greenhouse gases. If as a result of these actions the EPA were to set emission limits for carbon dioxide from electric utilities, the amount of coal our customers purchase from us could decrease.

        In the absence of federal legislation or regulation, many states and regions have adopted greenhouse gas initiatives. In December 2005, seven northeastern states (Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, and Vermont) signed the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative agreement, or RGGI, calling for implementation of a cap and trade program by 2009 aimed at reducing carbon dioxide emissions from power plants in the participating states. Since its inception, several additional northeastern states and Canadian provinces have joined as participants or observers. RGGI held its first carbon dioxide allowance auction in September 2008 and will hold quarterly auctions during the initial three-year compliance period from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2011 to allow utilities to buy allowances to cover their carbon dioxide emissions.

        Climate change initiatives are also being considered or enacted in some western states. In September 2006, California enacted the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, which establishes a statewide greenhouse gas emissions cap of 1990 levels by 2020 and sets a framework for further reductions after 2020. In September 2006, California also adopted greenhouse gas legislation that prohibits long-term baseload generators from having a greenhouse gas emissions rate greater than that of combined cycle natural gas generator. In February 2007, the governors of Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon and Washington launched the Western Climate Initiative in an effort to develop a

132


Table of Contents


regional strategy for addressing climate change. The goal of the Western Climate Initiative is to identify, evaluate and implement collective and cooperative methods of reducing greenhouse gases in the region to 15% below 2005 levels by 2020. Since its initial launching, a number of additional western states and provinces have joined the initiative or have agreed to participate as observers, including Montana, which has joined the initiatives and Wyoming, which has signed on as an observer. The proposed scope of the cap and trade program pursuant to the Western Climate Initiative include fossil fuels (such as coal) production and processing. Thus, our coal mines could incur direct costs if the proposals are implemented by Montana and Wyoming, although currently we do not believe that any such direct costs on our operations would be material.

        Midwestern states have also adopted initiatives to reduce and monitor greenhouse gas emissions. In November 2007, the governors of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, South Dakota and Wisconsin and the premier of Manitoba signed the Midwestern Greenhouse Gas Reduction Accord to develop and implement steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

        These and other state and regional climate change rules will likely require additional controls on coal-fired power plants and industrial boilers and may even cause some users of coal to switch from coal to a lower carbon fuel. There can be no assurance at this time that a carbon dioxide cap and trade program, a carbon tax or other regulatory regime, if implemented by the states in which our customers operate or at the federal level, will not affect the future market for coal in those regions. The permitting of new coal-fired power plants has also recently been contested by state regulators and environmental organizations based on concerns relating to greenhouse gas emissions. Increased efforts to control greenhouse gas emissions could result in reduced demand for coal.

        Even in the absence of comprehensive federal or state legislation on greenhouse gas emissions, climate change has increasingly become an issue that must be addressed in connection with the preparation of environmental impact statements, or EIS's, necessary to obtain additional federal coal leases. We have recently received extensive comments from several environmental groups pertaining to the extent of climate change discussion that should be included within the EIS document for the federal coal lease application pending for one of our mines. We have been working in cooperation with the BLM's consultant to adequately address these concerns for the final EIS document and subsequent record of decision. Although we do not expect these comments to prevent us from obtaining approval for federal coal leases, it is possible that they could delay the leasing process.

Clean Water Act

        The federal Clean Water Act, or CWA, and corresponding state and local laws and regulations affect coal mining operations by restricting the discharge of pollutants, including dredged or fill materials, into waters of the U.S. The CWA provisions and associated state and federal regulations are complex and subject to amendments, legal challenges and changes in implementation. Recent court decisions and regulatory actions have created uncertainty over CWA jurisdiction and permitting requirements that could variously increase or decrease the cost and time we expend on CWA compliance.

        CWA requirements that may directly or indirectly affect our operations include the following:

133


Table of Contents

134


Table of Contents

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

        The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA, may affect coal mining operations by establishing requirements for the proper management, handling, transportation and disposal of hazardous wastes. Currently, certain coal mine wastes, such as overburden and coal cleaning wastes, are exempted from hazardous waste management under RCRA. Any change in this exemption could significantly increase our costs. Most state hazardous waste laws also exempt wastes generated from coal combustion, such as coal ash, and instead treat them as either solid wastes or special wastes. The EPA has proposed national non-hazardous waste regulations for certain wastes generated from coal combustion, such as coal ash, when the wastes are disposed of in surface impoundments or landfills or used as mine-fill. Any reclassification of coal combustion products as hazardous wastes could increase our customers' operating costs and potentially reduce their ability to purchase coal.

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

        The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, or CERCLA, and similar state laws affect coal mining operations by, among other things, imposing cleanup requirements for threatened or actual releases of hazardous substances. Under CERCLA and similar state laws, joint and several liability may be imposed on waste generators, site owners, lessees and others regardless of fault or the legality of the original disposal activity. Although the EPA excludes most wastes generated by coal mining and processing operations from the hazardous waste laws, such wastes can, in certain circumstances, constitute hazardous substances for the purposes of CERCLA. In addition, the disposal, release or spilling of some products used by coal companies in operations, such as chemicals, could trigger the liability provisions of CERCLA or similar state laws. Thus, we may be subject to liability under CERCLA and similar state laws for coal mines that we currently own, lease or operate or that we or our predecessors have previously owned, leased or operated, and sites to which we or our predecessors sent waste materials. We may be liable under CERCLA or similar state laws for the cleanup of hazardous substance contamination and natural resource damages at sites where we own surface rights.

Endangered Species Act

        The federal Endangered Species Act, or ESA, and counterpart state legislation protect species threatened with possible extinction. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, or USFWS, works closely with the OSM and state regulatory agencies to ensure that species subject to the ESA are protected from mining-related impacts. A number of species indigenous to the areas in which we operate are protected under the ESA, and compliance with ESA requirements could have the effect of prohibiting or delaying us from obtaining mining permits. These requirements may also include restrictions on timber harvesting, road building and other mining or agricultural activities in areas containing the affected species or their habitats. For example, our Spring Creek mine recently applied for lease modification under the BLM leasing regulations, and the area we were proposing to include was declared critical sage grouse habitat by the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks department. This requires a certain degree of mitigation of the impacts on the habitat in order for us to obtain approval of this lease modification. Should more stringent protective measures be applied, or if the USFWS lists the sage grouse as threatened or endangered, this could result in increased operating costs, heightened difficulty in obtaining future mining permits, or the need to implement additional mitigation measures.

135


Table of Contents

Use of Explosives

        Our surface mining operations are subject to numerous regulations relating to blasting activities. Pursuant to these regulations, we incur costs to design and implement blast schedules and to conduct pre-blast surveys and blast monitoring. In addition, the storage of explosives is subject to regulatory requirements. For example, pursuant to a rule issued by the Department of Homeland Security in 2007, facilities in possession of chemicals of interest (including ammonium nitrate at certain threshold levels) must complete a screening review in order to help determine whether there is a high level of security risk such that a security vulnerability assessment and a site security plan will be required. It is possible that our use of explosives in connection with blasting operations may subject us to the Department of Homeland Security's new chemical facility security regulatory program.

Other Environmental Laws

        We are required to comply with numerous other federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations in addition to those previously discussed. These additional laws include, for example, the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Toxic Substance Control Act and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act.

136


Table of Contents


MANAGEMENT

Executive Officers, Directors and Director Nominees

        Set forth below is information concerning our executive officers and directors as of October 5, 2008. Prior to the offering, we will appoint our remaining executive officers. Once we appoint our remaining executive officers, we will provide the required compensation-related information in a subsequent filing.

Name
  Age   Position(s)

Colin Marshall

    44   Chief Executive Officer and Director

Michael Barrett

    39   Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer

James Orchard

    48   Vice President of Marketing & Government Affairs

Gary Rivenes

    38   Vice President of Operations

A. Nick Taylor

    57   Vice President of Technical Services & Business Improvement Process

Preston Chiaro

    54   Director

David Hager

    52   Director Nominee

Wayne Murdy

    64   Chairman

        Colin Marshall has served as our Chief Executive Officer and a director since July 2008 and has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of RTEA since June 2006. From March 2004 to May 2006, Mr. Marshall served as General Manager of Rio Tinto's Pilbara Iron's west Pilbara iron ore operations in Tom Price, West Australia, and as General Manager of RTEA's Cordero Rojo Mine in Wyoming from August 2000 to March 2004. Mr. Marshall worked for Rio Tinto plc in London as an analyst in the Business Evaluation Department from 1991 to 1996. From 1996 to 2000, he was Finance Director of Pacific Coal. Mr. Marshall received his bachelor's degree and his master's degree in mechanical engineering from Brunel University and his MBA from the London Business School.

        Michael Barrett has served as our Chief Financial Officer since September 2008 and has served as the Chief Financial Officer of RTEA since April 2007. From November 2004 to April 2007, Mr. Barrett served as Director, Finance & Commercial Analysis of RTEA, and as Principal Business Analyst of Rio Tinto Iron Ore's new business development group from December 2001 to November 2004. From May 1997 to May 2000, Mr. Barrett worked as a Senior Business Analyst for WMC Resources Ltd, a mining company, and was Chief Financial Officer and Finance Director of Medtech Ltd. and Auxcis Ltd., two technology companies listed on the Australian stock exchange, from May 2000 to December 2001. From August 1991 to May 1997, he held positions with PricewaterhouseCoopers in England and Australia. Mr. Barrett received his bachelor's degree with joint honors in economics and accounting from Southampton University and is a Chartered Accountant.

        James Orchard is expected to be appointed as our Vice President of Marketing & Government Affairs prior to the completion of this offering and has served as Vice President, Marketing and Sustainable Development for RTEA since March 2008. From January 2005 to March 2008 Mr. Orchard was director of customer service for RTEA. Prior to that he worked for Rio Tinto's Aluminum division in Australia and New Zealand for over 17 years, where he held a number of technical, operating, process improvement and marketing positions. Mr. Orchard graduated from the University of New South Wales with a BSc and a PhD in industrial chemistry.

        Gary Rivenes is expected to be appointed as our Vice President of Operations prior to the completion of this offering and has served as Vice President, Operations of RTEA since January 2008. From September 2007 to December 2007, Mr. Rivenes was General Manager for RTEA's Jacobs Ranch mine and RTEA's Antelope mine from November 2004 to August 2007. Prior to that he worked for

137


Table of Contents


RTEA in a variety of operational and technical positions for RTEA's Antelope, Colowyo and Jacobs Ranch mines for nearly 16 years. Mr. Rivenes holds a bachelor of science in mining engineering from Montana College of Mineral, Science & Technology.

        A. Nick Taylor is expected to be appointed as our Vice President of Technical Services & Business Improvement Process prior to the completion of this offering and has served as RTEA's Vice President of Technical Services & Business Improvement Process since October 2005. Prior to that, Mr. Taylor worked for Rio Tinto Technical Services in Sydney providing advice to Rio Tinto mining operations worldwide from 1992 to 2005, at its Bougainville Copper operations in New Guinea from 1980 to 1981, and at its Rossing Uranium operations in Namibia from 1976 to 1980. Additionally, he worked for Nchanga Consolidated Copper Mines in Zambia from 1973 to 1976, and as a mining consultant in Australia between 1981 and 1992. Mr. Taylor graduated from the University of Wales with a bachelor of science degree in mining engineering.

        Preston Chiaro has served as a director since July 2008. Mr. Chiaro has served since September 2003 as the Chief Executive Officer of Rio Tinto's Energy group, which includes Rio Tinto's coal operations in Australia, Rio Tinto Coal Australia and Coal & Allied, our predecessor, RTEA, and certain uranium interests in Energy Resources of Australia and the Rössing mine in Namibia. From September 1995 to September 2003, Mr. Chiaro was employed by Rio Tinto Borax, a leading producer of borate deposits, and served as its Chief Executive Officer and President from 1999 to September 2003. Mr. Chiaro is a Chairman of the World Coal Institute and also serves as a member of the board of directors of Rössing Uranium Limited. Mr. Chiaro received his B.S. in Environmental Engineering and his Masters in Engineering in Environmental Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechic Institute.

        David Hager is expected to be elected as a director prior to the completion of this offering. Mr. Hager served as the Chief Operating Officer of Kerr-McGee Corporation, an oil and gas company acquired by Anadarko Petroleum, from May 2005 to August 2006. Prior to March 2005 Mr. Hager held various positions at Kerr-McGee, including as Senior Vice President, Oil and Gas Exploration and Production from March 2003 to May 2005, Vice President, Exploration and Production from June 2002 to March 2003 and Vice President, Gulf of Mexico and Worldwide Deepwater E&P from April 2000 to June 2002. Mr. Hager is a member of the board of directors of Pride International and Devon Energy Corporation. Mr. Hager received his B.S. in Geophysics from Purdue University and his MBA from Southern Methodist University.

        Wayne W. Murdy has served as a director and as Chairman of our board of directors since October 2008. Mr. Murdy served as the Chairman of Newmont Mining Corporation, a leading gold producer with operations on five continents, from January 2002 to December 2007 when he retired. From January 2001 to June 2007, Mr. Murdy served as the Chief Executive Officer of Newmont Mining Corporation. Prior to that, Mr. Murdy held various other executive positions at Newmont Mining Corporation, including as President from July 1999 to February 2002. Mr. Murdy is a member of the board of directors of Qwest Communications International Inc., a trustee of the Denver Art Museum and a past Chairman of the International Council on Mining and Metals. Mr. Murdy received his B.S. in Business Administration from California State University at Long Beach and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Composition of the Board of Directors

        Our board of directors currently consists of 3 members. We intend to elect additional directors prior to this offering and the required number of directors will meet the independence requirements under the applicable listing standards of the NYSE. In accordance with the transition periods provided to newly public companies under the applicable rules of the NYSE, our board of directors will be required to be comprised of a majority of "independent directors" within 12 months of our listing on the NYSE. Prior to the completion of this offering, our board of directors will consist of 5 members.

138


Table of Contents


Each director will hold office until the election and qualification of his or her successor, or his or her earlier death, resignation or removal.

Committees of the Board of Directors

        Our board of directors will establish an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating/corporate governance committee. The members of each committee will be appointed by the board of directors and serve until their successor is elected and qualified, unless they are earlier removed or resign.

Audit Committee

        Upon completion of this offering, our board of directors will establish an audit committee to assist the board of directors in the oversight of the financial reporting process. Upon completion of this offering, our committee will comply with the applicable listing standards of the NYSE related to audit committees and the requirements for an "audit committee financial expert," as required under applicable rules of the SEC. In accordance with these listing standards, each member of our audit committee will be independent within one year from the date of this prospectus.

        The audit committee will assist our board of directors in fulfilling its responsibility to shareholders, the investment community and governmental agencies that regulate our activities in its oversight of:

        The audit committee may study or investigate any matter of interest or concern that the committee determines is appropriate and may retain outside legal, accounting or other advisors for this purpose.

Compensation Committee

        Upon completion of this offering, our board of directors will establish a compensation committee to assist the board of directors in the oversight of our compensation and benefits programs for our officers and employees. Upon completion of this offering our committee will comply with the applicable listing standards of the NYSE related to compensation committees. In accordance with these listing standards, each member of our compensation committee will be independent within one year from the date of this prospectus.

        We expect that our compensation committee will establish a subcommittee for purposes of complying with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code and Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

        In 2008, Rio Tinto retained Mercer (US) Inc., or Mercer, to provide information, analyses, and advice regarding compensation for our named executive officers and non-employee directors. For a detailed description of the role of the committee and the committee's use of independent advice in establishing our compensation programs, see "—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Administration and Process" below.

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee

        Upon completion of this offering, our board of directors will establish a nominating/corporate governance committee to assist the board of directors in identifying qualified director nominees and establishing and implementing our corporate governance guidelines. Upon completion of this offering

139


Table of Contents


our committee will comply with the independence requirements under the applicable listing standards of the NYSE related to nominating/governance committees. In accordance with these listing standards, each member of our nominating/corporate governance committee will be independent within one year from the date of this prospectus.

Compensation of Directors

        We are newly formed and have paid no amounts to our directors to date.

Pre-Offering Director Compensation

        Prior to the initial public offering of our common shares, the chairperson will receive $30,000 in cash per month (up to a maximum of $120,000) as well as reimbursement of all reasonable business expenses including first class travel upon submission of appropriate receipts. This per-month fee will terminate upon our initial public offering.

Post-Offering Director Compensation

        In developing the compensation package for our non-employee board members, we took into account the role we expect each director will have on our board, as well as our desire to align directors' and shareholders' interests, which is consistent with our overall compensation philosophy.

        Following our initial public offering, the non-executive chairperson of our board of directors will be paid an annual cash retainer of $150,000. Each of our other non-employee directors will be paid an annual cash retainer of $75,000. Additionally, we will pay an annual fee to each of our committee chairpersons, $15,000 in the case of the Audit Committee chairman and $7,500 for each other chairperson. Each non-employee director will receive an annual grant of restricted stock which will be valued at $75,000 and will be subject to a three-year vesting period so long as the director remains on our board. These awards will vest pro rata in the event of a director's death or disability, in the event of a non-reelection, in the event of resignation with the prior consent of the nominating and corporate governance committee or under certain specified circumstances, or if he or she is otherwise removed for reasons that do not constitute "cause". The award will also vest on a pro-rata basis at the compensation committee's discretion, in the event of a resignation without the prior consent of the nominating and corporate governance committee of other cessation of service. In addition to the annual grants, all non-employee directors will receive an initial award of restricted stock valued at $150,000 (based upon the initial public offering price) following our initial public offering. Our chairperson will receive an additional grant of restricted stock valued at $150,000 in each of his first two years as chairperson. These additional restricted stock grants will be subject to the same terms as the annual restricted stock grants described above. We will reimburse all directors for reasonable and customary out-of-pocket business expenses incurred in connection with their services as a director, including first class travel, upon submission of appropriate receipts.

        Finally, our directors will be subject to stock ownership guidelines mandating they each hold an amount of equity equal to three times their respective annual retainer within five years of joining the board.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Introduction

        Before our separation from Rio Tinto America and this offering, our employees, including our executives, were compensated by various entities within the Rio Tinto Group. Accordingly, such entities determined the compensation of our employees within the parameters set by Rio Tinto. To ease our transition to a stand-alone company, and to the extent it supports our compensation philosophy, we intend to retain those aspects of Rio Tinto's compensation program design that we determine

140


Table of Contents


appropriate for us as an independently-traded U.S.-based public entity. Pay levels and certain pay practices will be determined relative to our U.S. peers, taking into account the local labor markets we operate in, as described below. Following our initial public offering, the compensation committee of our board of directors will be responsible for overseeing the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers and for overseeing our general compensation philosophy as a public company. In preparation for our separation from Rio Tinto America and our initial public offering, we will implement a new compensation framework and, together with Rio Tinto America, also take the appropriate transition steps to give effect to our separation and to position us for continued profitability and growth.

        We expect that we will continue to develop our compensation programs during fiscal years 2008 and 2009 for our executives and other employees to refine the alignment of our compensation programs with our business strategy and shareholder interests.

Objectives of the New Compensation Framework

        We believe that highly talented, dedicated and results-oriented executives and other employees are critical to our profitability and long-term success. Accordingly, in designing the framework of our new compensation program, we focused on the following as our primary objectives:

        We intend to use equity-based compensation to align management's interests with our shareholders, as well as motivate and retain our key employees.

        As a stand-alone company, our executive compensation program will be administered by the compensation committee. In this capacity, the compensation committee will use its judgment and seek advice, as appropriate, from independent external compensation consultants in establishing base salary, target award and performance levels for incentive plan purposes based on a number of factors. These factors include compensation received by similar executive officers at peer group companies, the conditions of the markets in which we operate, and the relative earnings performance of peer group companies. Mercer, a compensation consulting firm, has provided the following services during 2008 to assist us as we continue to develop our compensation program:

141


Table of Contents

        Future decisions with respect to determining the amount or form of executive and director compensation will be made by the compensation committee alone and the compensation committee may take into account factors and considerations other than the information and advice provided by Mercer.

        As more fully described herein, we expect that, among the factors considered by the compensation committee will be the relative performance and the compensation of executives in other public companies in the coal industry of comparable size, revenues and asset holdings. For purposes of determining compensation levels following our initial public offering, the following companies will comprise the initial peer group:

        The composition of the peer group will be reviewed annually by the compensation committee and will be modified as circumstances warrant to maintain a relevant peer group.

        The compensation committee may also use data of companies in comparable industries such as energy, oil and gas, and mining from the following surveys:

Components of Our New Executive Compensation Program

        Our new executive compensation program will be comprised of:

142


Table of Contents

        We intend to minimize the use of perquisites, but will implement appropriate policies regarding perquisites in the year following our initial public offering. In addition, we will enter into employment agreements with some of our executive officers that are intended to promote the continued availability of their services following our initial public offering. These employment agreements are described below under "—Components of our New Executive Compensation Program—Employment Agreements."

Base Salary

        We will provide our senior management with a level of base salary in the form of cash compensation which we intend to be appropriate in light of their roles and responsibilities within our organization. At the completion of this offering, annual base salaries for our named executive officers will be $            ,             ,             ,            ,             for Mr. Marshall, Mr. Barrett, Mr. Rivenes, Mr. Taylor and Mr. Orchard, respectively. Our compensation committee will review and approve subsequent adjustments.

Short-Term Incentives

        We expect to adopt a Short-Term Incentive Plan, or STIP, to provide rewards for achieving annual operating and financial performance objectives. We expect the STIP will have a one-year performance period and awards under the plan will be paid based on actual performance against pre-established performance targets that are approved in advance by our compensation committee.

        We expect to determine annual incentive compensation under the STIP after the completion of each fiscal year and we intend for it to be based on mine site operational performance and company-wide operational and financial performance.

Long-Term Equity-Based Awards

        We believe that long-term performance is enhanced through an "ownership culture." Accordingly, we expect that a significant part of our executive compensation program will consist of equity-based compensation.

        We expect to establish a Long-Term Incentive Plan, or LTIP, that will provide for the grant of share-based compensation including share based awards and options. We will make awards under the LTIP as part of the annual LTIP granting process to eligible participants or on an ad hoc basis outside this process under exceptional circumstances. As determined by the compensation committee, stock options will have a fixed term after which they will not be exercisable and will vest on the basis of time or performance at the end of the vesting period. In the case of performance contingent awards, the performance conditions will be established by the compensation committee at the time of grant. Awards can vest at an enhanced percentage of the target award in the case of performance above targeted levels. Likewise, no award will be earned if performance falls below a "threshold" level.

        Other than with respect to awards granted in connection with our initial public offering, no awards will be granted under this plan prior to the pricing of our initial public offering. The amounts of awards under the LTIP to be made to our executives in connection with our initial public offering and the terms of the awards are described below under "—Transition Policies—LTIP Awards at the IPO."

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code

        The provisions of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallow a tax deduction to a publicly-traded company that pays compensation in excess of $1,000,000 to any of its named executive officers in any fiscal year, unless the compensation plan and awards meet certain requirements. Certain exceptions apply in the case of plans adopted by a private company before becoming publicly traded. We expect that the LTIP and STIP will each be designed to provide for the

143


Table of Contents


granting of certain awards that qualify as performance based compensation under Section 162(m), for which the deductibility limits under Section 162(m) do not apply during the applicable transition period.

        In general, the transition period ends upon the earliest of:

Benefits

        We expect to offer a competitive level of benefits to our named executive officers, as well as our other senior management, as part of our total executive compensation package. These benefits are intended to help recruit and retain senior executives. We will review our benefit programs on a periodic basis by comparing against the relevant peer group companies, reviewing published survey information, and obtaining advice from various independent benefit consultants.

        We expect to make the following programs generally available to all of our employees, including our named executive officers:


Employment Agreements

         New Employment Agreements.    The following paragraphs describe the terms of our new employment agreements with each of Mr. Marshall and Mr. Barrett. Prior to the closing of our initial public offering we intend to enter into employment agreements with our other named executive officers.

        The new employment agreements are based on a similar form and provide assurances as to position, responsibility, location of employment and certain compensation terms, which, if breached, would constitute "good reason" to terminate employment with us. Each agreement is structured to have a term of three years that will extend automatically for one year unless advance written notice by either party is provided. In addition, the agreements provide for:

144


Table of Contents

Transition Policies

        We will also take transition steps to give effect to our separation from Rio Tinto America and to position us for profitability and growth as an independent organization. These steps include providing offering-related equity awards and addressing outstanding Rio Tinto equity awards.

Cloud Peak LTIP Awards at the IPO

        At the time of our separation from Rio Tinto America, under the terms of the Rio Tinto share plans, employees in divested entities are treated as "good leavers." Outstanding Rio Tinto equity awards will not be converted into our shares and therefore our senior executives will not have an initial equity position in Cloud Peak. Given this, we will be granting LTIP awards in the year of our initial public offering of a reasonable multiple of each executive's base salary ("IPO Awards"). The purpose of these awards is to establish a significant ownership stake by the executives which is intended to increase alignment between our executives and shareholders. Further, for retention reasons, it is intended that the awards granted in the year of our initial public offering will vest solely on the basis of time.

         Terms.    We will be granting IPO Awards in two forms. Half of the IPO Awards will be in the form of restricted stock that vest in full on the third anniversary of the pricing of the initial public offering, subject to the employee's continued employment with us. Dividends and distributions, if any, will be reinvested in shares of restricted stock based on the fair market value of such shares on the date such dividend or distribution is paid or made. The remainder of the IPO Awards will be in the form of stock options. These options will have an exercise price equal to the initial public offering price and will ultimately be valuable to our executives only if our share price appreciates after the initial public offering. These awards will vest on the third anniversary of the pricing of our initial public offering, subject to the employee's continued employment with us. Upon a termination of employment by us with cause or by the executive without good reason unvested outstanding stock options shall be forfeited and all shares of restricted stock for which the restrictions have not lapsed shall be forfeited. Outstanding options which are vested will expire if not exercised within thirty days (extended to account for any blackout periods) of termination by us for cause or by the executive without good reason. For all other terminations, the executive will receive a pro rata portion of the award based on the number of days worked over the three year vesting period and shall have to up to one year to exercise vested options. The general retirement and termination provisions applicable to these IPO Awards, are described below under "—Potential Payments on Termination and Change in Control". Other terms applicable to restricted stock and stock options granted under our LTIP are described below under "—2008 Long Term Incentive Plan—". IPO Awards granted to employees outside of the United States are subject to any applicable requirements of local law.

         Amounts.    IPO Awards will be issued to our named executive officers in respect of a total of            common shares, with            in the form of restricted stock and            in the form of share options. Grants of restricted shares to the other members of our senior management will total            shares. In determining the aggregate amounts and material terms and conditions of the IPO Awards, we engaged the services of Mercer, who advised as to these items.

145


Table of Contents

        The number of restricted shares to be granted is            ,            ,             ,            and            for Mr. Marshall, Mr. Barrett, Mr. Rivenes, Mr. Taylor and Mr. Orchard, respectively, and the number of shares to be granted subject to options is            ,             ,            ,             and            for Mr. Marshall, Mr. Barrett, Mr. Rivenes, Mr. Taylor and Mr. Orchard, respectively.

        At or near our initial pubic offering, we intend to grant to each of our employees a founder's grant of a certain specified number of shares of our restricted stock. The objective of the founder's grant is to enable each employee to participate in the success of the company by sharing in the value they help create. The founder's grant also helps align the broader employee group with the interests of the shareholders through the creation of an ownership interest and a minimum holding period. These restricted shares vest in full on the third anniversary of their date of grant, subject to continued employment with us through that date. We expect to grant an aggregate of            shares of restricted stock pursuant to these founder's grants.

        Certain of our employees, including each of our named executive officers, hold existing awards under the Rio Tinto share-based incentive plans. As a result of the completion of this offering, our employees will be deemed to have terminated employment with Rio Tinto as "good leavers" for purposes of the applicable plan rules. Treatment of outstanding Rio Tinto awards for our employees, including our named executive officers, is expected to be in accordance with the normal terms of the applicable Rio Tinto plans and award agreements. We will not assume or convert any Rio Tinto awards into awards in respect of our common shares. The treatment of these awards is discussed in more detail in the following paragraphs. For grants made prior to 2004, all vested options expire if not exercised within five years after separation from Rio Tinto and all options granted in 2004 and later expire if not exercised within one year of termination or the date of vesting, whichever is later.

         Short-Term Incentive Plan.    Rio Tinto provides annual cash incentive awards under its Short Term Incentive Plan ("RIO STIP"). Upon the separation from Rio Tinto America, these awards will become payable by Rio Tinto based on the satisfaction of the performance goals set for the 2008 fiscal year and assuming a participant is still employed by us at the end of the performance period.

         Rio Tinto Share Option Plan.    Rio Tinto provides part of its long term compensation through performance vested option grants under its Share Option Plan (the "SOP"). Upon the separation from Rio Tinto America, the number of shares under each grant of share options that were held less than a year will be reduced by a pro rata amount based on the amount of time worked during the first 12 months of the performance period and will vest upon the normal vesting date subject to performance as measured against the performance conditions. After the separation from Rio Tinto America, remaining outstanding share options will continue to vest in full upon the normal vesting date subject to performance as measured against Rio Tinto performance conditions.

         Mining Companies Comparative Plan.    Rio Tinto provides part of its long-term compensation through conditional share awards under its Mining Companies Comparative Plan ("MCCP") payable in shares upon achievement of performance objectives. Upon the separation from Rio Tinto America, the number of shares under each grant of conditional share awards that are held less than a year will be reduced by a pro rata amount based on the amount of time worked during the performance period and will vest upon the normal vesting date subject to performance as measured against the performance conditions. After the separation from Rio Tinto America, the remaining outstanding conditional share awards will vest in full upon the normal vesting date subject to performance as measured against the Rio Tinto performance conditions.

146


         Management Share Plan.    Rio Tinto provides part of its long term compensation through time-vesting conditional share awards under its Management Share Plan ("MSP"). Upon the separation from Rio Tinto America, a pro rata amount of these conditional share awards will immediately vest based on the amount of time that has elapsed since the grant was made over the total vesting period.

         Share Savings Plan.    Rio Tinto provides part of its long term compensation by allowing its employees to invest in its common stock at a 15% discount under its Share Savings Plan ("SSP"). Pursuant to the plan, each pay period a salary deduction will be used to purchase company shares at the end of a two year period or, for the UK participants, 5 years. Upon the separation from Rio Tinto America, Rio Tinto shares will be purchased based on the amount already saved and any future salary deductions will terminate.

Future Cloud Peak Arrangements

Potential Payments on Termination and Change in Control

        Our named executive officers will be entitled to payments and benefits upon a termination of employment under certain circumstances and upon a future change in control. These potential payments and benefits may be provided pursuant to the terms of their employment arrangements with us and/or the award agreements applicable to the IPO Awards granted in connection with our initial public offering.

        The following paragraphs describe the termination entitlements under the expected terms of our employment agreements with each of Mr. Marshall and Mr. Barrett. Prior to our initial public offering, we intend to enter into employment agreements with our other named executive officers.

        If Mr. Marshall resigns for "good reason" or is terminated "without cause", he will be entitled to receive as severance, in addition to any amounts earned and unpaid through the date of termination (x) a lump sum payment equal to              times the sum of (A) his base salary and (B) his target annual bonus under the STIP for the year of termination and (y) a pro rata annual bonus to be calculated based on the Company's actual performance at the end of the performance year and reduced by an amount equal to the number of days actually worked, divided by 365. Mr. Marshall will also be entitled to the continuation of medical benefits on the same terms as active employees for             months (or until such time as Mr. Marshall becomes eligible for medical benefits from a subsequent employer that are at least equal to those provided by us) and such payments will be lieu of our COBRA obligations. As a condition to receiving the salary continuation and continuation of medical benefits, Mr. Marshall must (a) execute, deliver and not revoke a general release of claims and (b) abide by restrictive covenants as detailed below. If Mr. Marshall's employment terminates due to death or disability, other than amounts earned and unpaid through the date of termination, he or his estate will only be entitled to the pro rata bonus for the year of such termination.

        The agreement will require Mr. Marshall to abide by a perpetual restrictive covenant relating to non-disclosure. The agreement will also include covenants relating to non-solicitation and non-competition during Mr. Marshall's employment term and until the one year period following the termination of his employment.

        If Mr. Barrett resigns for "good reason" or is terminated without "cause", he will be entitled to receive as severance, in addition to any amounts earned and unpaid through the date of termination (x) a lump sum payment equal to            times the sum of (A) base salary and (B) his target annual bonus under the STIP for the year of termination and (y) a pro rata annual bonus to be calculated based on the Company's actual performance at the end of the performance year and reduced by an amount equal to the number of days actually worked, divided by 365. Mr. Barrett will also be entitled

147



to the continuation of medical benefits on the same terms as active employees for            months (or until such time as Mr. Barrett becomes eligible for medical benefits from a subsequent employer) that are at least equal to those provided by us and such payments will be lieu of our COBRA obligations. As a condition to receiving the salary continuation and continuation of medical benefits, Mr. Barrett must (a) execute, deliver and not revoke a general release of claims and (b) abide by restrictive covenants as detailed below. If Mr. Barrett's employment terminates due to death or disability, other than amounts earned and unpaid through the date of termination, he or his estate will only be entitled to the pro rata bonus for the year of such termination.

        The agreement will require Mr. Barrett to abide by a perpetual restrictive covenant relating to non-disclosure. The agreement will also include covenants relating to non-solicitation and non-competition during the employment term until the one year period following the termination of employment.

IPO Awards

        No IPO Awards were granted or outstanding in fiscal 2007. We will grant IPO Awards under our LTIP as part of the initial public offering of our common shares. The termination and change in control provisions of these awards are described in the following paragraphs. A description of other terms applicable to the IPO Awards is found above under "—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Transition Policies".

         Stock Options.    If a named executive officer's employment is terminated by the Company or any of its subsidiaries (i) without "cause", (ii) by the grantee for "good reason" (each as defined in such named executive officer's employment agreement), (iii) as a result of the grantee's retirement or (iv) due to death or disability, in each case if such termination occurs on or after the date of grant, the vesting schedule for the options will be accelerated on a pro rata basis as follows: the total number of shares underlying the options granted multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days between (A) the grant date and (B) the date of the employee's termination of employment, and the denominator of which is 1,095.

         Restricted Shares.    If a named executive officer's employment is terminated by the Company or any of its subsidiaries (i) without "cause", (ii) by the grantee for "good reason" (each as defined in such named executive officer's employment agreement), (iii) by the grantee's retirement or (iv) due to death or disability, in each case if such termination occurs on or after the date of grant, the restrictions on the awards will be lifted on a pro rated basis as follows: the total number of restricted shares granted multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days between (A) the grant date and (B) the date of the employee's termination of employment, and the denominator of which is 1,095.

         Change in Control Provisions.    All of the IPO Awards will become fully vested and exercisable, as applicable, in the event of a future change in control of us (as defined in the LTIP). We believe this protection is appropriate for the incentive and retention purposes of these initial IPO Awards. However, our compensation committee has full discretion to provide additional conditions to vesting or restrictions for any future awards under the LTIP, as described below under "—2008 Long Term Incentive Plan."

Short Term Incentive Plan

        The Cloud Peak Energy Inc. short term incentive plan, or the STIP, is intended to provide a means of annually rewarding certain employees based on our performance including the operating performance of our mine. The STIP is expected to be designed to qualify the compensation payable to an executive officer under the STIP as "qualified performance-based compensation" eligible for exclusion from the tax deduction limitation of Section 162(m) of the Code. The STIP will contain

148



features designed to comply with this exemption for "qualified performance-based compensation." Under the STIP, executive officer means any employee who, as of the beginning of the performance period is an officer subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

        The following is a description of the anticipated material terms of the STIP. Prior to the offering, no bonuses will have been granted under the STIP.

        The STIP will be administered by the compensation committee with respect to participants who are executive officers; provided, however, that with respect to employees who are not executive officers, the compensation committee may delegate to the chief executive officer the authority and responsibility to administer the STIP to the same extent as the compensation committee (or to such lesser extent as the compensation committee may provide). The compensation committee shall have full authority to establish the rules and regulations relating to the STIP, to interpret the STIP and those rules and regulations, to select participants in the STIP, to determine our and, if applicable, our operating units' financial target(s) and each participant's target award percentage for each performance period, to approve all the awards, to decide the facts in any case arising under the STIP and to make all other determinations and to take all other actions necessary or appropriate for the proper administration of the STIP, including the delegation of such authority or power, where appropriate.

        Prior to, or as soon as practicable following, the commencement of each performance period, the compensation committee or chief executive officer, as applicable, shall determine the employees who will participate in the STIP during that performance period and determine each such participant's target award percentage and the financial target(s) for that performance period.

        Generally, a participant will earn an award for a performance period based on the company's achievement of the applicable financial target(s) and in some cases a combination of company and mine-site performance. In addition, awards for any participant (other than the executive officers) may be adjusted based on the participants' personal performance.

         Business Criteria.    To determine the payments of cash bonuses subject to performance goals, the compensation committee will set performance goals, target award percentages and financial targets with respect to the executive officers of the company and the chief executive officer will set performance goals, target award percentages and financial targets with respect to all other employees. These goals, percentages and targets will be used to determine awards for specified performance periods, generally one-year in duration unless otherwise designated by the compensation committee. Financial targets, for any performance period, may be expressed in terms of (i) stock price; (ii) earnings per share; (iii) operating income; (iv) return on equity or assets; (v) cash flow; (vi) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA; (vii) revenues; (viii) overall revenue or sales growth; (ix) expense reduction or management; (x) market position; (xi) total stockholder return; (xii) return on investment; (xiii) earnings before interest and taxes, or EBIT; (xiv) net income; (xv) return on net assets; (xvi) economic value added; (xvii) stockholder value added; (xviii) cash flow return on investment; (xix) net operating profit; (xx) net operating profit after tax; (xxi) return on capital; (xxii) return on invested capital; (xxiii) cost per ton or cost per unit; (xxiv) total material moved; (xxv) tons shipped; (xxvi) tire life improvement; (xxvii) increased truck, dragline or shovel OEE; (xxviii) effective equipment utilization; (xxix) achievement of savings from business improvement projects; (xxviii) capital project deliverables; (xxix) performance against environmental targets; (xxx) safety performance and/or incident rate; (xxxi) coal pricing targets; (xxxii) coal sale targets; (xxxiii) human resources management targets, including medical cost reductions and time to hire; (xxxiv) achievement of warehouse and purchasing performance measures or (xxxv) any combination, including one or more ratios, of the foregoing.

149


        Such performance goals may be absolute or relative (to prior performance or to the performance of one or more other entities or external indices) and may be expressed in terms of a progression within a specified range. To the extent permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code without adversely affecting the treatment of the cash bonus award as "qualified performance-based compensation," the compensation committee may provide for the manner in which performance will be measured against the performance goals (or may adjust the performance goals) to reflect the impact of specified corporate transactions, special charges, foreign currency effects, accounting or tax law changes and other extraordinary or nonrecurring events that have been publicly disclosed, whether or not by us, and all as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

         Maximum Amounts.    The maximum award an executive officer may receive for any performance period is $            . There is no maximum award for participants other than the executive officers.

        Generally, each award to the extent earned will be paid in a single lump sum cash payment following the performance period. The compensation committee will certify the amount of the executive officers' awards prior to payment thereof.

        If a change of control (as defined in the STIP) occurs, we, within 60 days thereafter, will pay to each participant an award that is calculated assuming that all performance percentages are 100%, prorated to the date of the change of control based on the number of days that have elapsed during the performance period through the date of the change of control.

        No participant shall have any right to receive payment of an award under the STIP for a performance period unless the participant remains employed by us through the payment date of the award for such performance period. However, if the participant has active service with us for at least 3 months during any performance period, but, prior to payment of the award for such performance period, such participant's employment with us terminates due to the participant's death, disability or, except in the case of an executive officer, retirement or such other special circumstances as determined by the compensation committee on a case by case basis, the participant (or, in the event of the participant's death, the participant's estate or beneficiary) shall remain eligible to receive a prorated portion of any earned award.

        The compensation committee may at any time amend or terminate (in whole or in part) the STIP. No such amendment may adversely affects a participant's rights to, or interest in, an award earned prior to the date of the amendment, unless the participant shall have agreed thereto.

        Except in connection with the death of a participant, a participant's right and interest under the STIP may not be assigned or transferred. Any attempted assignment or transfer will be null and void and will extinguish, in our sole discretion, our obligation under the STIP to pay awards with respect to the participant.

        The Plan will be unfunded. We will not be required to establish any special or separate fund, or to make any other segregation of assets, to assure payment of awards.

150


2008 Long Term Incentive Plan

        In connection with this offering we will adopt The Cloud Peak Energy Inc. 2008 Long Term Incentive Plan, or the LTIP, which permits the grant of options, stock appreciation rights, or SARs, restricted stock, restricted stock units, dividend equivalent rights, share awards and performance awards (including performance share units, performance units and performance-based restricted stock). Individuals who are eligible to receive awards and grants under the LTIP include our and our subsidiaries' employees, officers, consultants, advisors and directors. A summary of the principal features of the LTIP is provided below. Prior to the offering, no awards had been made under the LTIP.

        The following is a description of the anticipated materials terms of the LTIP, which is qualified in its entirety by reference to the form of LTIP that will be filed as an exhibit to, and incorporated by reference into, the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.

         Shares Available for Issuance.    The LTIP authorizes a share pool of            shares of our common stock,             of which may be issued in respect of incentive stock options. Whenever any outstanding award granted under the LTIP expires, is canceled, is settled in cash or is otherwise terminated for any reason without having been exercised or payment having been made in respect of the entire award, the number of shares available for issuance under the LTIP shall be increased by the number of shares previously allocable to the expired, canceled, settled or otherwise terminated portion of the award.

         Administration and Eligibility.    The LTIP will be administered by a committee, which is currently intended to be the compensation committee. The committee determines who is eligible to participate in the LTIP, determines the types of awards to be granted, prescribes the terms and conditions of all awards, and construes and interprets the terms of the LTIP. All decisions made by the committee are final, binding and conclusive.

         Award Limits.    In any three calendar year period, no participant may be granted awards in respect of more than            shares in the form of (i) stock options, (ii) SARs, (iii) performance-based restricted stock and (iv) performance share units, with the above limit subject to the adjustment provisions discussed below.

         Type of Awards.    Below is a description of the types of awards available for grant pursuant to the LTIP.

         Stock Options.    The committee may grant stock options to eligible participants. The stock options may be either nonqualified stock options or incentive stock options. The exercise price of any stock option must be equal to or greater than the fair market value of our common stock on the date the stock option is granted. The term of a stock option cannot exceed 10 years (except with respect to nonqualified options that may be exercised for up to 1 year following the death of a participant even if such period extends beyond the 10 year term). Subject to the terms of the LTIP, the option's terms and conditions, which include but are not limited to, exercise price, vesting, treatment of the award upon termination of employment, and expiration of the option, are determined by the committee and will be set forth in an award agreement. Payment for shares purchased upon exercise of an option must be made in full at the time of purchase. The exercise price may be paid (i) in cash or its equivalent, (ii) in shares of our common stock already owned by the participant, on terms determined by the committee, (iii) in the form of other property as determined by the committee, (iv) through participation in a "cashless exercise" procedure involving a broker or (v) by a combination of the foregoing.

         SARs.    The committee may, in its discretion, either alone or in connection with the grant of an option, grant a SAR to a participant. The terms and conditions of the award will be set forth in an award agreement; however, the exercise price will never be less than the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date. SARs may be exercised at such times and be subject to such other

151



terms, conditions, and provisions as the committee may impose. SARs that are granted in tandem with an option may only be exercised upon the surrender of the right to purchase an equivalent number of shares of our common stock under the related option and may be exercised only with respect to the shares of our common stock for which the related option is then exercisable. The committee may establish a maximum amount per share that would be payable upon exercise of a SAR. A SAR entitles the participant to receive, on exercise of the SAR, an amount equal to the product of (i) the excess of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date preceding the date of surrender over the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date the SAR was granted, or, if the SAR is related to an option, the per-share exercise price of the option and (ii) the number of shares of our common stock subject to the SAR or portion thereof being exercised. Subject to the discretion of the committee, payment for a SAR may be made (i) in cash, (ii) in shares of our common stock or (iii) in a combination of both (i) and (ii).

         Dividend Equivalent Rights.    The committee may grant dividend equivalent rights either in tandem with an award or as a separate award. The terms and conditions applicable to each dividend equivalent right would be specified in an award agreement. Amounts payable in respect of dividend equivalent rights may be payable currently or, if applicable, deferred until the lapsing of restrictions on the dividend equivalent rights or until the vesting, exercise, payment, settlement or other lapse of restrictions on the award to which the dividend equivalent rights relate.

         Service Based Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units.    The committee may grant awards of time-based restricted stock and restricted stock units. Restricted stock and restricted stock units may not be sold, transferred, pledged or otherwise transferred until the time, or until the satisfaction of such other terms, conditions and provisions, as the committee may determine. When the period of restriction on restricted stock terminates, unrestricted shares of our common stock will be delivered to the award holder. Unless the committee otherwise determines at the time of grant, restricted stock carries with it full voting rights and other rights as a stockholder, including rights to receive dividends and other distributions, if any. At the time an award of restricted stock is granted, the committee may determine that the payment to the participant of dividends (if any) be deferred until the lapsing of the restrictions imposed upon the shares and whether deferred dividends are to be converted into additional shares of restricted stock or held in cash. The deferred dividends would be subject to the same forfeiture restrictions and restrictions on transferability as the restricted stock with respect to which they were paid. Each restricted stock unit represents the right of the participant to receive a payment upon vesting of the restricted stock unit or on any later date specified by the committee. The payment will equal the fair market value of a share of common stock as of the date the restricted stock unit was granted, the vesting date or such other date as determined by the committee at the time the restricted stock unit was granted. At the time of grant, the committee may provide a limitation on the amount payable in respect of each restricted stock unit. The committee may provide for a payment in respect of restricted stock unit awards (i) in cash or (ii) in shares of our common stock having a fair market value equal to the payment to which the participant has become entitled.

         Share Awards.    The committee may award shares to participants as additional compensation for service to us or a subsidiary or in lieu of cash or other compensation to which participants have become entitled. Share awards may be subject to other terms and conditions, which may vary from time to time and among participants, as the compensation committee determines to be appropriate.

         Performance Share Units and Performance Units.    Performance share unit awards and performance unit awards may be granted by the compensation committee under the LTIP. Performance share units are denominated in shares and represent the right to receive a payment in an amount based on the number of shares multiplied by the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date the performance share units were granted, become vested or any other date specified by the committee, or a percentage of such amount depending on the level of performance goals attained. Performance units

152



are denominated in a specified dollar amount and represent the right to receive a payment of the specified dollar amount or a percentage of the specified dollar amount, depending on the level of performance goals attained. Such awards would be earned only if performance goals established for performance periods are met. A minimum one-year performance period is required. At the time of grant the compensation committee may establish a maximum amount payable in respect of a vested performance share or performance unit. The compensation committee may provide for payment (i) in cash, (ii) in shares of our common stock having a fair market value equal to the payment to which the participant has become entitled or (iii) by a combination of both (i) and (ii).

         Performance-Based Restricted Stock.    The compensation committee may grant awards of performance-based restricted stock. The terms and conditions of such award will be set forth in an award agreement. Such awards would be earned only if performance goals established for performance periods are met. Upon the lapse of the restrictions, the committee will deliver a stock certificate or evidence of book entry shares to the participant. Awards of performance-based restricted stock will be subject to a minimum one-year performance cycle. At the time an award of performance-based restricted stock is granted, the compensation committee may determine that the payment to the participant of dividends will be deferred until the lapsing of the restrictions imposed upon the performance-based restricted stock and whether deferred dividends are to be converted into additional shares of performance-based restricted stock or held in cash.

         Performance Objectives.    Performance share units, performance units and performance-based restricted stock awards under the LTIP may be made subject to the attainment of performance goals based on one or more of the following business criteria: (i) stock price; (ii) earnings per share; (iii) operating income; (iv) return on equity or assets; (v) cash flow; (vi) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA; (vii) revenues; (viii) overall revenue or sales growth; (ix) expense reduction or management; (x) market position; (xi) total stockholder return; (xii) return on investment; (xiii) earnings before interest and taxes, or EBIT; (xiv) net income; (xv) return on net assets; (xvi) economic value added; (xvii) stockholder value added; (xviii) cash flow return on investment; (xix) net operating profit; (xx) net operating profit after tax; (xxi) return on capital; (xxii) return on invested capital; (xxiii) cost per ton or cost per unit; (xxiv) total material moved; (xxv) tons shipped; (xxvi) tire life improvement; (xxvii) increased truck, dragline or shovel OEE; (xxviii) effective equipment utilization; (xxix) achievement of savings from business improvement projects; (xxviii) capital project deliverables; (xxix) performance against environmental targets; (xxx) safety performance and/or incident rate; (xxxi) coal pricing targets; (xxxii) coal sale targets; (xxxiii) human resources management targets, including medical cost reductions and time to hire; (xxxiv) achievement of ware house and purchasing performance measures or (xxxv) any combination, including one or more ratios, of the foregoing.

        Performance criteria may be in respect of our performance, that of any of our subsidiaries, that of any of our divisions or any combination of the foregoing. Performance criteria may be absolute or relative (to our prior performance or to the performance of one or more other entities or external indices) and may be expressed in terms of a progression within a specified range. The compensation committee may, at the time performance criteria in respect of a performance award are established, provide for the manner in which performance will be measured against the performance criteria to reflect the effects of extraordinary items, gain or loss on the disposal of a business operation, unusual or infrequently occurring events and transactions that have been publicly disclosed, changes in accounting principles, the impact of specified corporate transactions (such as a stock split or stock dividend), special charges and tax law changes, all as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (to the extent applicable).

         Amendment and Termination of the LTIP.    Our board of directors has the right to amend the LTIP except that our board of directors may not amend the LTIP in a manner that would impair or adversely

153



affect the rights of the holder of an award without the award holder's consent. In addition, our board of directors may not amend the LTIP absent stockholder approval to the extent such approval is required by applicable law, regulation or exchange requirement. The LTIP will terminate on the tenth anniversary of the date of stockholder approval. The board of directors may terminate the LTIP at any earlier time except that termination cannot in any manner impair or adversely affect the rights of the holder of an award without the award holder's consent.

         Repricing of Options or SARs.    Unless our stockholders approve such adjustment, the compensation committee will not have authority to make any adjustments to options or SARs that would reduce or would have the effect of reducing the exercise price of an option or SAR previously granted under the LTIP.

         Change in Control.    The effect, if any, of a change in control on each of the awards granted under the LTIP may be set forth in the applicable award agreement.

         Adjustments.    In the event of a reclassification, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, reorganization, spin-off, split-up, stock dividend, stock split or reverse stock split, or similar transaction or other change in corporate structure affecting our common stock, adjustments and other substitutions will be made to the LTIP, including adjustments in the maximum number of shares subject to the LTIP and other numerical limitations. Adjustments will also be made to awards under the LTIP as the compensation committee determines appropriate. In the event of our merger or consolidation, liquidation or dissolution, outstanding options and awards will either be treated as provided for in the agreement entered into in connection with the transaction (which may include the accelerated vesting and cancellation of the options and SARs or the cancellation of options and SARs for payment of the excess, if any, of the consideration paid to stockholders in the transaction over the exercise price of the options or SARs), or converted into options or awards in respect of the same securities, cash, property or other consideration that stockholders received in connection with the transaction.

2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

        Our board of directors adopted our 2008 Employee Share Purchase Plan ("2008 ESPP"). Our 2008 ESPP is intended to qualify under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. Our 2008 ESPP enables our eligible employees to purchase our common shares at a discount through payroll deductions and both plans are administered by a committee of at least three of our employees, officers and/or directors as designated by our board.

        We have reserved a total of              common shares for issuance under the 2008 ESPP. The plan will become effective as of the completion of the initial public offering of our common shares, subject to any required approvals.

2008 ESPP

         Eligibility.    All of our U.S. employees, including our named executive officers, who are scheduled to work for more than 5 months each year and have been working with us on a continuous basis for more than six months are eligible to participate in the 2008 ESPP.

         Offering Periods.    Eligible employees may begin participating in the 2008 ESPP at the start of any offering period. Offering periods will generally start on January 1 each year and will last one year.

         Amount of Contributions and Exercise.    Under the 2008 ESPP, participants are able to purchase our common shares through after-tax payroll deductions from 1% to 5% of base salary each month. At the end of the offering, participants may elect to withdraw some or all of their savings in cash or to exercise their option to purchase up to             of our common shares (or any other maximum number of shares determined by the plan committee from time to time). Purchases of our common shares will

154



occur on the last day in the offering period. However, the value of the shares purchased in any calendar year (measured as of the beginning of the applicable offering period) may not exceed $25,000 and share purchases are limited if a participant, as a result of such purchase, would possess more than 5% of our parent's or any of our subsidiaries' total combined voting power.

         Purchase Price.    The purchase price for common shares under our 2008 ESPP will be the lower of the closing price of our common shares on (1) the trading day on or immediately before the first day of the offering period or (2) on the trading day on or immediately before the last day of the offering period, in each case less a discount of 5%.

         Other Provisions.    Employees may end their participation in the 2008 ESPP at any time. Participation ends automatically upon any termination of employment including death, in which case the amounts credited are returned to the participant's successors in interest. If a change in control occurs, the current offering period will end and shares will be purchased with the payroll deductions accumulated by participants through the day prior to the effective time of the change in control, unless the 2008 ESPP is assumed by our successor or the participant elects to withdraw his or her savings in cash. Our board of directors (or the compensation committee) may amend or terminate the 2008 ESPP at any time. Any increase to the number of common shares reserved for issuance under the 2008 ESPP will require the approval of our shareholders. Our 2008 ESPP will terminate on the tenth anniversary of the date it is approved by our shareholders unless terminated earlier by the board.

155


Table of Contents


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Historical Relationship with Rio Tinto

Credit Facility and Short-Term Intercompany Obligations

        We were party to an $800 million revolving credit facility with Rio Tinto America. We could make borrowings under the facility upon at least one day's prior written notice and paid interest on a quarterly basis calculated on the daily average borrowings outstanding during the quarter at a rate equal to the average three-month U.S. dollar LIBOR plus a margin of 1.5%, which, at December 31, 2007, was 6.5%. Borrowings made under the facility were required to be repaid in whole or in part on such date or dates as were agreed between us. We had outstanding borrowings of $492.8 million, $583.2 million and $500.6 million as of December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and $541.9 million as of June 30, 2008. This intercompany debt was contributed to capital of RTEA on September 24, 2008. As of                        , 2008 the only amounts owed by us to Rio Tinto America and its affiliates are short-term intercompany obligations for $                  that arose in the ordinary course of our business. This amount may increase or decrease in the ordinary course of our business and all of our outstanding short-term intercompany obligations will be contributed to the capital of RTEA immediately prior to this offering. We had outstanding short-term intercompany obligations owed to the Rio Tinto Group totaling $76.9 million, $74.7 million, $159.8 million and $107.2 million as of December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 and June 30, 2008, respectively, including our obligations with respect to the Colowyo mine and other non-coal businesses.

Rio Tinto America Cash Management

        In October 2006, we and Rio Tinto America, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Kennecott Holdings Corporation, or KHC, entered into a cash management arrangement whereby the cash of our company is transferred to and from KHC and combined into a singular pool of funds with certain other Rio Tinto Group companies in the U.S. This arrangement, administered by the Rio Tinto Services Inc. treasury services department, was put in place to allow Rio Tinto America to maximize the most efficient use of cash for its U.S. companies. Under this arrangement, funds paid into the primary relationship bank are swept out of the consolidated account or brought in to cover presented items each day. Any money swept out is invested overnight, earning interest, and returned the next morning. Prior to July 1, 2008, balances resulting from these transactions bore interest at the same rate as our revolving credit facility, which was 6.5% as of December 31, 2007. Since July 1, 2008, balances resulting from these transactions bear interest at the same rate as interest earned on the overnight investment account at the bank. Interest income related to transactions with KHC totaled $1.1 million, $2.9 million and $6.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and $2.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. This arrangement will be terminated in connection with our separation from Rio Tinto America.

General and Administrative Costs

        KHC and Rio Tinto Services Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto America, have historically provided various services and other general corporate support to us, including tax, treasury, corporate secretary, procurement, information systems and technology, human resources, accounting services and insurance/risk management in the ordinary course of business under preexisting contractual arrangements. We were charged for these services provided under our preexisting contractual arrangements on a unit cost or cost allocation basis, such as per invoice processed, proportion of information technology users, share of time, calculated on a combination of factors, including percentage of operating expenditures, head count and revenue. During the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, and for the six months ended June 30, 2008, we incurred approximately $8.1 million, $11.4 million, $13.2 million and $6.9 million respectively, for these services. Under the

156


Table of Contents


Transition Services Agreement that we will enter into with an affiliate of Rio Tinto America, they will continue to provide certain of those services to us following this offering. See "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements."

Rio Tinto Headquarters Overhead Costs

        We have been allocated Rio Tinto headquarters overhead costs, including technology and innovation, board, community and external relations, investor relations, human resources and, the Energy Product Group. The allocations were based on a percentage of operating expenses or revenue. During the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, and for the six months ended June 30, 2008, we incurred approximately $7.9 million, $6.9 million, $10.4 million and $5.2 million, respectively, for our allocated costs under this arrangement. Following the completion of this offering, we will no longer pay this charge to Rio Tinto.

Guarantees

        In the normal course of business we are required to secure certain operational obligations such as reclamation or coal lease obligations. These obligations have normally been secured through surety bonds and letters of credit. While we were a part of the Rio Tinto Group, Rio Tinto typically served as guarantor of our surety bonds. Our letters of credit were generally issued under Rio Tinto's pre-existing credit facilities on our behalf. During the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 we incurred interest expense of approximately $2.1 million, $2.5 million, $1.3 million and $0.4 million respectively for guarantee fees paid to Rio Tinto associated with the outstanding standby letters of credit and performance bonds. These guarantees and financial instruments will terminate upon completion of this offering.

Tax Sharing Arrangement

        We are currently an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto America Holdings Inc., which files consolidated federal income tax returns on behalf of itself and certain of its subsidiaries, including us. In January 2005, we entered into a tax sharing agreement with Rio Tinto America Holdings Inc. whereby we agreed to pay periodically throughout the year the amount of estimated federal income taxes we would otherwise be required to pay were we to file a separate consolidated federal income tax return. The amounts we pay are determined by Rio Tinto America Holdings Inc. Once the consolidated federal income tax return has been filed by Rio Tinto America Holdings Inc. for a given tax period, we are then obligated to pay for the difference between any hypothetical liability and the actual payments we have made throughout the year under this agreement. If our actual payments exceed our estimated liability, under the terms of the agreement we receive a payment for this excess amount from Rio Tinto America Holdings Inc. Our payments in 2005 and 2006 were based on alternative minimum taxable income rather than regular taxable income. As of January 2007, Rio Tinto adopted a new methodology whereby we pay or receive a refund based on regular taxable income, offset by any alternative minimum tax credits belonging to our business that are used by the members of the Rio Tinto Group party to this agreement during the year.

        During the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, we made payments to Rio Tinto America Holdings Inc. totaling $6.3 million, $20.0 million and $2.4 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, we have received $13.6 million in payments from Rio Tinto America Holdings Inc. due to the use of certain of our alternative minimum tax credits. We will no longer make payments under this agreement following the completion of this offering, but we will be obligated to make certain tax-related payments to Rio Tinto America or its affiliates as provided in the Tax Receivable Agreement. See "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements—Separation-Related Agreements—Tax Receivable Agreement."

157


Table of Contents

Payment of Transaction Expenses

        Rio Tinto America or an affiliate of Rio Tinto America has agreed to pay for our benefit all out-of-pocket costs and expenses (including all underwriting fees, discounts and commissions and other direct costs incurred in connection with our separation from Rio Tinto America, this offering, the concurrent offering and in connection with other debt and credit facilities described in this prospectus or that we have entered into or intend to incur or enter into concurrently with or shortly after the completion of this offering). As of June 30, 2008, Rio Tinto America or its affiliate paid $                to, or for the benefit of, us.

Other Transactions with Rio Tinto America

        In 2007, we began leasing office space from Rio Tinto America, and we included in rental expense $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 and $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 for rent paid by us to Rio Tinto America. In addition, in 2006 and 2007 we purchased land and equipment from Rio Tinto America for $1.1 million and $5.1 million, respectively. We also sold equipment to Rio Tinto America in 2006 at its net book value of $0.7 million.

Policies and Procedures for Review and Approval of Related Person Transactions

        Prior to completion of this offering, we expect that our board of directors will adopt a policy providing that the board review and approve or ratify transactions in excess of $100,000 of value in which we participate and in which a director, executive officer or 5% shareholder has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. Under this policy, the board of directors is to obtain all information it believes to be relevant to a review and approval or ratification of these transactions. After consideration of the relevant information, the board of directors is to approve only those related party transactions that they determine are not inconsistent with the best interests of the company. We expect this policy to include categorical standards providing that specified types of transactions will be deemed not to be inconsistent with the best interests of the company. This policy will not apply to agreements entered into with Rio Tinto and its affiliates that are in existence at the time of the consummation of this offering, including the agreements described under "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements."

Future Arrangements Between Rio Tinto America and Us

        See "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements" for a description of the agreements we will enter into with Rio Tinto America and its affiliates in connection with our separation from Rio Tinto America and this offering and the concurrent offering.

158


Table of Contents


PRINCIPAL AND SELLING SHAREHOLDERS

        The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock and Series A Preferred Stock as of October 1, 2008 by:

        Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and includes voting or investment power with respect to the shares. Common stock subject to options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of                        , 2008 are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding the options. These shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

        Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on                        shares of common stock outstanding as of                        and                          shares of common stock to be outstanding after this offering. None of the beneficial owners listed in the table below will own any shares of our Series A Preferred Stock after this offering.

        Unless otherwise indicated to our knowledge, all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to their shares of common stock, except to the extent authority is shared by spouses under applicable law. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each listed shareholder is 505 S. Gillette Ave., Gillette, WY 82718.

 
   
   
   
  Shares Beneficially
Owned After this
Offering without
Exercise of Option
Granted to the
Underwriters
   
 
 
  Shares Beneficially
Owned Prior to this
Offering
  Number
of
Shares
Being
Offered
  Number of Shares
Being Offered
Pursuant to an
Option Granted to
the Underwriters
 
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
  Number   Percentage   Number   Percentage(3)  

Rio Tinto America Inc.(1)

      (2)                              

Michael Barrett

                                     

Preston Chiaro

                                     

David Hager

                                     

Colin Marshall

                                     

Wayne Murdy

                                     

James Orchard

                                     

Gary Rivenes

                                     

A. Nick Taylor

                                     

All directors and executive officers as a group (     persons)

                                     

(1)
Rio Tinto America Inc. is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc. Rio Tinto plc may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares held by Rio Tinto America Inc. Rio Tinto America owns            shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, representing 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of our Series A Preferred Stock immediately prior to the consummation of this offering and the concurrent offering. Rio Tinto America will sell all of its shares of Series A Preferred Stock in the concurrent offering.

(2)
The number of shares beneficially owned by Rio Tinto America prior to this offering includes            shares of common stock beneficially owned by Rio Tinto America that are issuable upon the conversion of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock.

(3)
The percentage of shares beneficially owned after this offering does not reflect the Series A Preferred Stock.

159


Table of Contents


DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

General

        After this offering and the concurrent offering, our authorized capital stock will consist of            shares of our common stock, $0.01 par value and            shares of our preferred stock, $0.01 par value. As of            , 2008, there were            shares of common stock outstanding held of record by approximately            shareholders. Immediately following the completion of this offering there will be                         shares of common stock outstanding (                         shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full).                        shares of our authorized preferred stock have been designated Series A Preferred Stock and will be outstanding immediately after the completion of this offering.

        The following description does not purport to be complete and is subject to the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, forms of which will be filed as exhibits to this registration statement. The descriptions are qualified in their entirety by reference to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and to applicable law.

Common Stock

        The holders of our common stock will be entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the shareholders. Our shareholders will not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors. Subject to preferences that may be granted to any then-outstanding preferred stock, holders of our common stock will be entitled to receive ratably only those dividends that the board of directors may from time to time declare, and we may pay, on our outstanding shares in the manner and upon the terms and conditions provided by law. See "Dividend Policy." In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, holders of our common stock will be entitled to share ratably in all of our assets remaining after we pay our liabilities and distribute the liquidation preference of any then-outstanding preferred stock. Holders of our common stock will have no preemptive or other subscription or conversion rights. There will be no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to our common stock.

Preferred Stock

        Our board of directors will have the authority, without further action by the shareholders, to issue our preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of each series. These rights, preferences and privileges may include dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, liquidation preferences, sinking fund terms and the number of shares constituting any series or the designation of this series, any or all of which may be greater than the rights of our common stock. The issuance of our preferred stock could adversely affect the voting power of our holders of common stock and the likelihood that these holders will receive dividend payments and payments upon liquidation.

        Prior to the completion of this offering and the concurrent offering, our board of directors will authorize the issuance of our Series A Preferred Stock, the terms of which are generally described below. Unless required by applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange or automated quotation system on which our securities may be listed or traded, our authorized shares of preferred stock and shares of our common stock will be available for issuance without further action by our shareholders. If the approval of our shareholders is not required for the issuance of shares of our preferred stock or our common stock, our board of directors may determine not to seek shareholder approval. In some instances, the NYSE requires shareholder approval prior to listing shares, including where the present or potential issuance of shares could result in an increase in the number of shares of common stock, or in the amount of voting securities outstanding, of at least 20%.

160


Table of Contents

        As part of our separation from Rio Tinto America, we will issue            shares of our Series A Preferred Stock to Rio Tinto America. Rio Tinto America will offer the Series A Preferred Stock by means of a separate prospectus concurrently with this offering. The offering of our Series A Preferred Stock is conditioned upon the completion of this offering, and this offering is conditioned upon the completion of the offering of our Series A Preferred Stock.

General

        The Series A Preferred Stock initially will be limited to            shares. When issued and sold, the Series A Preferred Stock will have a liquidation preference per share equal to $50 per share and will be fully paid and non-assessable. The Series A Preferred Stock will rank junior to all of our indebtedness and other liabilities and will rank senior to our common stock, unless otherwise specified. Unless previously converted, the Series A Preferred Stock will automatically convert into shares of our common stock on            , 2011, referred to herein as the mandatory conversion date.

Dividends

        Dividends on our Series A Preferred Stock will be paid quarterly to, and including, the mandatory conversion date (as described below) at the rate per annum of            % of the liquidation preference of $50 per share of our Series A Preferred Stock.

        To the extent that we are legally permitted to pay dividends and our board of directors, or an authorized committee of our board of directors, declares a dividend payable with respect to our Series A Preferred Stock, we will pay such dividends in cash or, subject to certain limitations, in common stock or any combination of cash and common stock, as determined by us in our sole discretion, on each dividend payment date. No dividends shall be paid unless and until our board of directors, or an authorized committee of our board of directors, declares a dividend payable with respect to our Series A Preferred Stock. Any unpaid dividends will continue to accumulate.

Redemption

        Our Series A Preferred Stock will not be redeemable.

Liquidation Preference

        In the event of our voluntary or involuntary liquidation, winding-up or dissolution, subject to the rights of our creditors and holders of any shares of our capital stock then outstanding ranking senior to or on a parity with our Series A Preferred Stock, holders of our Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive a liquidation preference in the amount of $50 per share of the Series A Preferred Stock, plus an amount equal to accumulated and unpaid dividends on the shares to, but excluding, the date fixed for liquidation, winding-up or dissolution to be paid out of our assets available for distribution to our shareholders. If, upon our voluntary or involuntary liquidation, winding-up or dissolution, the amounts payable with respect to the liquidation preference plus an amount equal to accumulated and unpaid dividends of the Series A Preferred Stock and all shares of capital stock then outstanding ranking on a parity with the Series A Preferred Stock are not paid in full, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock and any parity stock will share equally and ratably in any distribution of our assets in proportion to the liquidation preference and an amount equal to accumulated and unpaid dividends to which they are entitled. After payment of the full amount of the liquidation preference and an amount equal to accumulated and unpaid dividends to which they are entitled, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock will have no right or claim to any of our remaining assets.

Voting Rights

        The holders of our Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to vote on all matters submitted to a vote of the holders of our common stock, as a single class with holders of our common stock, on an as

161


Table of Contents


converted basis assuming a conversion rate equal to the minimum conversion rate of                   shares of common stock for each share of Series A Preferred Stock; provided that if the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to elect two additional directors as described in the next paragraph, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock shall not be entitled to vote for directors with holders of our common stock at such regular or special meeting of our shareholders.

        If dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock are in arrears for six or more quarterly periods (whether or not consecutive), the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock, voting as a single class with any other class of capital stock or series of preferred stock, the terms of which expressly provide that such capital stock or preferred stock will rank on a parity with the Series A Preferred Stock, will be entitled to elect two directors and the number of directors that comprise our board will be increased by the number of directors so elected. These voting rights and the terms of the directors so elected will continue until such time as the dividend arrearage on the Series A Preferred Stock has been paid in full.

        In addition, the affirmative consent of holders of at least 662/3% of the outstanding Series A Preferred Stock, voting as a class, will be required:

        provided, however, that none of;

will be deemed to materially and adversely affect the special rights, preferences, privileges or voting powers of the Series A Preferred Stock.

Mandatory Conversion

        On the mandatory conversion date, each share of our Series A Preferred Stock, unless previously converted, will automatically convert into shares of our common stock, based on the conversion rate as described below. If, prior to the mandatory conversion date, we have not declared all or any portion of the accumulated and unpaid dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock, the conversion rate will be adjusted so that holders receive additional shares of our common stock.

        The conversion rate for each share of our Series A Preferred Stock will be not more than            shares of common stock and not less than                        shares of common stock, depending on the applicable market value of our shares of common stock. The "applicable market value" of our common stock is the average of the closing prices of our common stock over the 20 consecutive trading day period ending on, and including, the third trading day immediately preceding the mandatory conversion date.

162


Table of Contents

        The minimum and maximum conversion rates are subject to certain adjustments. The following table illustrates the conversion rate per share of Series A Preferred Stock subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments:

Applicable Market Value on Conversion Date
  Conversion Rate

less than or equal to $            

   

between $            and $            

  to

equal to or greater than $            

   

Conversion at the option of the holder

        At any time prior to the mandatory conversion date, holders may elect to convert their shares of our Series A Preferred Stock in whole or in part at the minimum conversion rate of                        shares of common stock for each share of Series A Preferred Stock. If, as of the effective date of any early conversion as described above, we have not declared all or any portion of the accumulated and unpaid dividends for all dividend periods ending prior to such early conversion date, the conversion rate will be adjusted so that holders receive an additional number of shares of common stock.

Provisional conversion at our option

        If, at any time prior to the mandatory conversion date, the closing price per share of common stock exceeds $                        (150% of the threshold appreciation price of $                        ), subject to anti-dilution adjustments, for at least 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days, we may elect, within five business days of the end of such period, to cause the conversion of all, but not less than all, of the Series A Preferred Stock then outstanding at the minimum conversion rate of                        shares of common stock for each share of Series A Preferred Stock. In addition, if prior to the mandatory conversion date we are party to a merger or consolidation transaction, in each case, that is not a cash acquisition as described below, then we may elect to cause the conversion of all, but not less than all, of the Series A Preferred Stock then outstanding at the maximum conversion rate of                        shares of common stock for each share of Series A Preferred Stock, effective immediately prior to the closing of such transaction. However, if the closing price per share of our common stock exceeds $                        (150% of the threshold appreciation price of $            ), subject to anti-dilution adjustments, for at least 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending with the trading day immediately preceding the closing date of such merger or consolidation transaction, then we shall be permitted to cause conversion at the minimum conversion rate of shares of common stock for each share of Series A Preferred Stock. The threshold appreciation price and conversion rates specified above are subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments. We will be permitted to cause conversion as described above only if, in addition to issuing to the holders the applicable number of shares of common stock, at the time of such conversion we are then legally permitted to pay and do pay the holders in cash or as an increase in the number of shares of common stock to be issued upon conversion, accumulated and unpaid dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock plus the present value of all the remaining dividend payments on the Series A Preferred Stock through, but excluding, the mandatory conversion date.

Conversion at the option of the holder upon cash acquisition; cash acquisition dividend make-whole amount

        Prior to the mandatory conversion date, if we are involved in a transaction or event in which 90% or more of our common stock is exchanged for, converted into, acquired for or constitutes solely the right to receive, consideration 10% or more of which is not common stock that is listed on, or immediately after the transaction or event will be listed on, a United States national securities exchange, which we refer to as a "cash acquisition," then each holder of our Series A Preferred Stock will have the right to convert its shares of our Series A Preferred Stock at a conversion rate determined

163


Table of Contents


based on the effective date of the transaction and the price paid (or deemed paid) per share of our common stock in such transaction.

        Holders who convert shares of our Series A Preferred Stock upon a cash acquisition will also receive (1) cash or as an increase in the number of shares of our common stock to be issued upon conversion, the present value of all the remaining dividend payments on the Series A Preferred Stock through, but excluding, the mandatory conversion date and (2) as an increase in the number of shares of common stock to be issued upon conversion, accumulated and unpaid dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock.

Anti-Dilution Adjustments

        The minimum and maximum conversion rates may be adjusted in the event of, among other things:

Listing

        We do not intend to list the Series A Preferred Stock on any stock exchange, automated quotation system or other market.

Board of Directors

        Our board of directors is currently composed of 3 members. Upon completion of this offering, our board of directors will be composed of       members. Under our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, we will not be able to have less than three nor more than 15 board members. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will authorize our board to fix the number of its members. A vacancy or a newly created board position will be filled by our board of directors. A nominee for director will be elected, as a general matter, if the votes cast for the nominee's election exceed the votes cast against the nominee's election. In the event of a director nomination by a shareholder in accordance with our amended and restated bylaws, directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast. Under our board's policy, and absent a shareholder nomination, a director who fails to receive the required number of votes for re-election will be expected to tender his resignation for board consideration and any board nominee, or any board appointee filling a director vacancy or newly created directorship, will be required to agree, prior to nomination, to tender his resignation for board consideration in the event of his failing to receive the requisite number of votes for re-election.

Corporate Opportunities

        Except as we have otherwise agreed to with Rio Tinto America under the Master Separation Agreement with respect to corporate opportunities during the first year, Rio Tinto America or any of the officers, directors, employees, advisory board members, agents, stockholders, members, partners, affiliates or subsidiaries ("Sponsor Stockholder") shall not: (i) have the duty to refrain from (a) engaging in the same or similar lines of business as us, (b) doing business with our customers or vendors, or (c) entering into or performing agreements with us; or (ii) be liable to us or any of our stockholders for breach of any fiduciary duty or other duty by reason of the fact that the Sponsor

164


Table of Contents


Stockholder engaged in any such activity or entered into such transactions, including corporate opportunities. We specifically renounce any interest or expectancy in such activities or transactions.

        In addition, if any Sponsor Stockholder acquires knowledge of a transaction which may be a corporate opportunity, we renounce any interest or expectancy in such corporate opportunity so that the Sponsor Stockholder has the right to hold and utilize the corporate opportunity for its own account or to direct, sell, assign or transfer the corporate opportunity to any person without the obligation to communicate or offer it to us. The Sponsor Stockholder will not be liable to us or any of our stockholders for breach of any fiduciary or other duty by reason of the fact that the Sponsor Stockholder acquires or utilizes the corporate opportunity, directs the corporate opportunity to another person or fails to communicate the business opportunity to us, unless, in the case of any Sponsor Stockholder who is a director or officer of us, the business opportunity is expressly offered in writing to the director or officer solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of our company.

        See "Master Separation Agreement" for additional information regarding these transactions.

Anti-Takeover Effects of Certain Provisions of Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and Delaware Law

        Certain provisions that will be included in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, which are summarized in the following paragraphs, and applicable provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL, may make it more difficult for or prevent an unsolicited third party from acquiring control of us or changing our board of directors and management. These provisions may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers or delaying changes in our control or in our management. These provisions are intended to enhance the likelihood of continued stability in the composition of our board of directors and in the policies furnished by them and to discourage certain types of transactions that may involve an actual or threatened change in our control. The provisions also are intended to discourage certain tactics that may be used in proxy fights. These provisions, however, could have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for our shares and, as a consequence, they also may inhibit fluctuations in the market price of our shares that could result from actual or rumored takeover attempts.

        Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that the number of directors on our board of directors is fixed by our board of directors. Newly created directorships resulting from any increase in our authorized number of directors will be filled solely by the vote of our remaining directors in office. Any vacancies in our board of directors resulting from death, resignation or removal from office will be filled solely by the vote of our remaining directors in office.

        The DGCL provides that shareholders are not entitled to the right to cumulate votes in the election of directors unless our certificate of incorporation provides otherwise. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will not expressly provide for cumulative voting.

        Our certificate of incorporation will provide that any director may be removed with or without cause by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the voting power of shares of our capital stock.

        Our amended and restated bylaws will provide that it may only be amended by our board of directors or upon the vote of holders of at least two-thirds of the voting power of shares of our capital stock.

165


Table of Contents

        Our amended and restated bylaws will provide that special meetings of our shareholders may be called at any time by the board or our chairman of our board. The holders of at least 20% of the outstanding shares of our common stock will also be able to call special meetings.

        The DGCL permits shareholder action by written consent unless otherwise provided by certificate of incorporation. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that our shareholders may not act by written consent.

        Our amended and restated bylaws will establish advance notice procedures with respect to shareholder proposals and nomination of candidates for election as directors other than nominations made by or at the direction of our board of directors or a committee of our board of directors. Shareholders will only be able to consider proposals or nominations specified in the notice of meeting or brought before the meeting by or at the direction of our board of directors or by a shareholder who was a shareholder of record on the record date for the meeting, who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has given to our secretary timely written notice, in proper form, of the shareholder's intention to bring that business before the meeting.

        The DGCL provides generally that the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote is required to amend a corporation's certificate of incorporation, unless the certificate of incorporation requires a greater percentage. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that the following provisions in the amended and restated certificate of incorporation may be amended only by a vote of at least two-thirds of the voting power of all of the outstanding shares of our stock entitled to vote:

        The authorization of our undesignated preferred stock will make it possible for our board of directors to issue our preferred stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the success of any attempt to change control of us.

        We will not be governed by Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law regulates corporate acquisitions and provides that specified persons who, together with affiliates and associates, own, or within three years did own, 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of a corporation may not engage in business combinations with the

166


Table of Contents

corporation for a period of three years after the date on which the person became an interested shareholder unless:

        The term "business combination" is defined to include mergers, asset sales and other transactions in which the interested shareholder receives or could receive a financial benefit on other than a pro rata basis with other shareholders.

Limitations on Liability and Indemnification of Officers and Directors

        The DGCL authorizes corporations to limit or eliminate the personal liability of directors to corporations and their shareholders for monetary damages for breaches of directors' fiduciary duties. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will include a provision that eliminates the personal liability of directors for monetary damages for actions taken as a director, except for liability:

        Our amended and restated bylaws will provide that we must indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent authorized by the DGCL. We will also be expressly authorized to carry directors' and officers' insurance providing indemnification for our directors, officers and certain employees for some liabilities. We believe that these indemnification provisions and insurance are useful to attract and retain qualified directors and executive officers.

        The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions that will be included in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may discourage shareholders from bringing a lawsuit against directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions may also have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against directors and officers, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our shareholders. In addition, your investment may be adversely affected to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and officers pursuant to these indemnification provisions.

        There is currently no pending material litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors, officers or employees for which indemnification is sought.

Registration Rights

        In connection with the completion of this offering, we will enter into a registration rights agreement with Rio Tinto America. See "Separation Transactions and Related Agreements—Separation-Related Agreements—Registration Rights."

167


Table of Contents

Listing

        We have applied to have our stock listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "CLD."

Transfer Agent and Registrar

        We expect to appoint ComputerShare Trust Company, N.A. as the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock and our Series A Preferred Stock.

168


Table of Contents


SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE

        Immediately prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common stock. Furthermore, since some shares of our common stock will not be available for sale for a certain period of time after this offering because of the contractual and legal restrictions on resale described below, sales of substantial amounts of common stock in the public market after these restrictions lapse including shares of our common stock issued upon exercise of options in exchange for our common stock, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock and our future ability to raise capital through the sale of our equity securities.

        Upon completion of this offering, and as described in "Prospectus Summary—The Offering," we will have                        shares of our common stock outstanding. Of these shares, the                        shares sold in this offering will be freely tradable without restrictions or further registration under the Securities Act, unless those shares are purchased by "affiliates" as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. The remaining                        shares of our common stock held by Rio Tinto America are "restricted securities" as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act and are subject to the contractual restrictions on resale described below and could be sold in the public market on subsequent dates after the expiration of those contractual restrictions. Restricted securities may be sold in the public market only if registered or if they qualify for an exemption from registration under Rule 144 or 701 under the Securities Act.

        In addition, we have issued                        shares of our Series A Preferred Stock to Rio Tinto America, which it will sell in a concurrent offering. Unless previously converted, each share of our Series A Preferred Stock will automatically convert on approximately the third anniversary of the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock into between a minimum of                         shares and a maximum of                        shares of our common stock, depending on the average of the closing prices of our common stock over the 20 consecutive trading day period ending on, and including, the third trading day immediately preceding approximately the third anniversary of the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock. The minimum and maximum conversion rates will be subject to anti-dilution adjustments in certain circumstances. At any time prior to the mandatory conversion date, holders may elect to convert their shares of Series A Preferred Stock at the minimum conversion rate of                                    shares of common stock for each share of Series A Preferred Stock. Prior to approximately the third anniversary of the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock, we may, upon the occurrence of certain circumstances elect to cause the conversion of all, but not less than all, of the Series A Preferred Stock then outstanding into a number of shares of common stock as described under "Description of Capital Stock—Preferred Stock—Series A Preferred Stock." Upon a conversion at our option, in addition to the shares of common stock due upon conversion, holders will be entitled to a provisional conversion dividend make-whole amount, which may be paid by increasing the number of shares of common stock to be issued on conversion as described under "Description of Capital Stock—Preferred Stock—Series A Preferred Stock." If holders elect to convert any shares of Series A Preferred Stock during a specified period beginning on the effective date of a cash acquisition of us, the conversion rate will be adjusted under certain circumstances and holders will also be entitled to a cash acquisition dividend make-whole amount, which may be paid by increasing the number of shares of common stock to be issued on conversion as described under "Description of Capital Stock—Preferred Stock—Series A Preferred Stock." Dividends on our Series A Preferred Stock are payable quarterly in arrears in cash, shares of our common stock or a combination thereof at our election when declared by our board of directors. Under certain circumstances, we may not be allowed to pay dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock in cash, including pursuant to debt financing arrangements we may have in place or because we do not have legally available funds. If this were to occur and such dividend was not otherwise declared prior to approximately the third anniversary of the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock, any such accumulated and unpaid dividend would be payable in shares of our

169


Table of Contents


common stock on approximately the third anniversary of the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock. All of such shares of common stock will be available for immediate resale in the public market upon conversion of or as a dividend on the Series A Preferred Stock, except for any such shares acquired by our affiliates or by persons who are subject to the lock-up agreements described below, which shares will be subject to the terms of such lock-up agreements.

Rule 144

        Under Rule 144, beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus, if Rio Tinto America will have beneficially owned shares of our common stock for at least six months, it would be entitled to sell within any three-month period a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of:

        Sales under Rule 144 by Rio Tinto America are also subject to specific manner of sale provisions, holding period requirements, notice requirements and the availability of current public information about us. If Rio Tinto America were deemed not to have been an affiliate of ours at any time during the three months preceding a sale, and it had beneficially owned common stock for at least six months, Rio Tinto America would be entitled to sell common stock under Rule 144 without regard to the volume, manner of sale and notice requirements of Rule 144 so long as we comply with the current public information requirement for the next six months after the six-month holding period expires.

Registration Rights

        In connection with this offering, Rio Tinto America will enter into a Registration Rights Agreement with us relating to the shares of common stock they will hold at the time of our initial public offering. Under this agreement, Rio Tinto America will have the right to require us to register for public resale under the Securities Act its shares of our common stock that it owns.

Lock-up Agreements

        Our officers and directors and Rio Tinto America have or will have signed lock-up agreements under which they agreed not to offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge, or otherwise dispose of, or to enter into any hedging transaction with respect to, any shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of our common stock for a period ending            days after the date of this prospectus, subject to extension for an additional            days upon the occurrence of certain events. These shareholders will together beneficially own an aggregate of                        shares of our common stock upon completion of this offering and the concurrent offering of our Series A Preferred Stock. The foregoing does not prohibit open market purchases and sales of our common stock by such holders after the completion of this offering or of common stock acquired in this offering or the sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to this offering. Other transfers or dispositions by our officers, directors and shareholders may be made pursuant to certain exceptions to the lock-up.

        For more information regarding the lock-up agreements, see "Underwriting."

Stock Options and Incentive and Benefit Plan Awards

        We intend to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission covering shares subject to options outstanding under our equity incentive plans but not exercised, as of the closing of this offering.

170


Table of Contents


MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

        The following is a summary of the material U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common shares by a non-U.S. holder. As used in this summary, the term "non-U.S. holder" means a beneficial owner of our common shares that is not, for United States federal income tax purposes:

        An individual may be treated as a resident of the United States in any calendar year for United States federal income tax purposes, instead of a nonresident, by, among other ways, being present in the United States on at least 31 days in that calendar year and for an aggregate of at least 183 days during a three-year period ending in the current calendar year. For purposes of this calculation, an individual would count all of the days present in the current year, one-third of the days present in the immediately preceding year and one-sixth of the days present in the second preceding year. Residents are taxed for U.S. federal income tax purposes as if they were U.S. citizens.

        If a partnership or other pass-through entity (including an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership or other type of pass-through entity for U.S federal income tax purposes) owns our common shares, the tax treatment of a partner or beneficial owner of the partnership or other pass-through entity may depend upon the status of the partner or beneficial owner and the activities of the partnership or entity and by certain determinations made at the partner or beneficial owner level. Partners and beneficial owners in partnerships or other pass-through entities that own our common shares should consult their own tax advisors as to the particular U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences applicable to them.

        This summary does not discuss all of the aspects of U.S. federal income and estate taxation that may be relevant to a non-U.S. holder in light of the non-U.S. holder's particular investment or other circumstances. In particular, this summary only addresses a non-U.S. holder that holds our common shares as a capital asset (generally, investment property) and does not address:

171


Table of Contents

        This summary is based on provisions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, applicable U.S. Treasury regulations and administrative and judicial interpretations, all as in effect or in existence on the date of this prospectus. Subsequent developments in U.S. federal income or estate tax law, including changes in law or differing interpretations, which may be applied retroactively, could have a material effect on the U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of our common shares as set forth in this summary. Each non-U.S. holder should consider consulting a tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. income and other tax consequences of acquiring, holding and disposing of our common shares.

Dividends

        We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common shares in the foreseeable future. See "Dividend Policy." In the event, however, that we pay dividends on our common shares that are not effectively connected with a non-U.S. holder's conduct of a trade or business in the United States, a U.S. federal withholding tax at a rate of 30%, or a lower rate under an applicable income tax treaty, will be withheld from the gross amount of the dividends paid to such non-U.S. holder. Non-U.S. holders should consider consulting their own tax advisors regarding their entitlement to benefits under a relevant income tax treaty.

        In order to claim the benefit of an applicable income tax treaty, a non-U.S. holder will be required to provide a properly executed U.S. Internal Revenue Service Form W-8BEN (or other applicable form) in accordance with the applicable certification and disclosure requirements. Special rules apply to partnerships and other pass-through entities and these certification and disclosure requirements also may apply to beneficial owners of partnerships and other pass-through entities that hold our common shares. A non-U.S. holder that is eligible for a reduced rate of U.S. federal withholding tax under an income tax treaty may obtain a refund or credit of any excess amounts withheld by filing an appropriate claim for a refund with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. Non-U.S. holders should consider consulting their own tax advisors regarding their entitlement to benefits under a relevant income tax treaty and the manner of claiming the benefits.

        Dividends that are effectively connected with a non-U.S. holder's conduct of a trade or business in the United States and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, are attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by the non-U.S. holder in the United States, will be taxed on a net income basis at the regular graduated rates and in the manner applicable to United States persons. In that case, the U.S. federal withholding tax discussed above will not apply if the non-U.S. holder provides a properly executed U.S. Internal Revenue Service Form W-8ECI (or other applicable form) in accordance with the applicable certification and disclosure requirements. In addition, a "branch profits tax" may be imposed at a 30% rate, or a lower rate under an applicable income tax treaty, on dividends received by a foreign corporation that are effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States.

Gain on disposition of our common shares

        A non-U.S. holder generally will not be taxed by the United States on any gain recognized on a disposition of our common shares unless:

172


Table of Contents

        In general, we will be treated as a "U.S. real property holding corporation" if the fair market value of our "U.S. real property interests" equals or exceeds 50% of the sum of the fair market value of our worldwide real property interests and our other assets used or held for use in a trade or business. The determination of the fair market value of our assets and, therefore, whether we are a U.S. real property holding corporation at any given time, will depend on the particular facts and circumstances applicable at the time.

        Currently, we believe that we are a U.S. real property holding corporation and will remain a U.S. real property holding corporation for the foreseeable future.

        However, even if we are or have been a U.S. real property holding corporation, a non-U.S. holder which did not beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 5% of the total fair market value of our common stock at any time during the shorter of the five-year period ending on the date of disposition or the period that our common stock was held by such holder (a "Non-5% Holder"), and which is not otherwise taxed under any other circumstances described above, generally will not be taxed on any gain realized on the disposition of our common stock if, at any time during the calendar year of the disposition, our common stock was "regularly traded on an established securities market" within the meaning of the applicable U.S. Treasury regulations.

        We have applied to have our common stock listed on the NYSE. However, if our common stock were not considered to be "regularly traded on an established securities market" within the meaning of the applicable U.S. Treasury regulations, then a non-U.S. holder (whether or not a Non-5% Holder) would be taxed for U.S. federal income tax purposes on any gain realized on the disposition of our common stock on a net income basis as if the gain were effectively connected with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business by such non-U.S. holder during the taxable year and, in such case, the person acquiring our common stock from such non-U.S. holder generally would have to withhold 10% of the amount of the proceeds of the disposition. Such withholding may be reduced or eliminated pursuant to a withholding certificate issued by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service in accordance with applicable U.S. Treasury regulations. We urge all non-U.S. holders to consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of these rules to them.

Federal estate tax

        Our common shares that are owned or treated as owned by an individual who is not a U.S. citizen or resident of the United States (as specially defined for U.S. federal estate tax purposes) at the time of death will be included in the individual's gross estate for U.S. federal estate tax purposes, unless an applicable estate tax or other treaty provides otherwise and, therefore, may be subject to U.S. federal estate tax.

173


Table of Contents

Information reporting and backup withholding tax

        Dividends paid to a non-U.S. holder may be subject to U.S. information reporting and backup withholding. A non-U.S. holder will be exempt from backup withholding if the non-U.S. holder provides a properly executed U.S. Internal Revenue Service Form W-8BEN or otherwise meets documentary evidence requirements for establishing its status as a non-U.S. holder or otherwise establishes an exemption.

        The gross proceeds from the disposition of our common shares may be subject to U.S. information reporting and backup withholding. If a non-U.S. holder sells our common shares outside the United States through a non-U.S. office of a non-U.S. broker and the sales proceeds are paid to the non-U.S. holder outside the United States, then the U.S. backup withholding and information reporting requirements generally will not apply to that payment. However, U.S. information reporting, but not U.S. backup withholding, will apply to a payment of sales proceeds, even if that payment is made outside the United States, if a non-U.S. holder sells our common shares through a non-U.S. office of a broker that:


unless the broker has documentary evidence in its files that the non-U.S. holder is not a United States person and certain other conditions are met or the non-U.S. holder otherwise establishes an exemption.

        If a non-U.S. holder receives payments of the proceeds of a sale of our common shares to or through a U.S. office of a broker, the payment is subject to both U.S. backup withholding and information reporting unless the non-U.S. holder provides a properly executed U.S. Internal Revenue Service Form W-8BEN certifying that the non-U.S. Holder is not a "United States person" or the non-U.S. holder otherwise establishes an exemption.

        A non-U.S. holder generally may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules that exceed the non-U.S. holder's U.S. federal income tax liability by filing a refund claim with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.

174


Table of Contents


UNDERWRITING

        Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an underwriting agreement dated                        , 2008, Rio Tinto America has agreed to sell to the underwriters named below, for whom Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC is acting as representative, the following respective numbers of shares of common stock:

Underwriter
  Number of Shares  

Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC

       
       
 

Total

       
       

        The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters are obligated to purchase all the shares of common stock in this offering if any are purchased, other than those shares covered by the over-allotment option described below. This obligation is subject to the condition that the offering of our Series A Preferred Stock be consummated concurrently with this offering. The underwriting agreement also provides that if an underwriter defaults the purchase commitments of non-defaulting underwriters may be increased or this offering may be terminated.

        Rio Tinto America has granted to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase on a pro rata basis up to                        additional shares from Rio Tinto America at the initial public offering price less the underwriting discounts and commissions. The option may be exercised only to cover any over-allotments of common stock.

        The underwriters propose to offer the shares of common stock initially at the public offering price on the cover page of this prospectus and to selling group members at that price less a selling concession of $                        per share. The underwriters and selling group members may allow a discount of $                        per share on sales to other broker/dealers. After the initial public offering, the representative may change the public offering price and concession and discount to broker/dealers.

        The following table shows the public offering price, underwriting discount and proceeds before expenses to the selling shareholder. The information assumes either no exercise or full exercise by the underwriters of their overallotment option.

 
  Per Share   Without Option   With Option  

Public offering price

  $                

Underwriting discount

                   

Proceeds, before expenses, to the selling shareholder

                   

        The expenses of this offering are estimated to be approximately $                         million.

        The underwriters have informed us that they do not expect sales to accounts over which the underwriters have discretionary authority to exceed 5% of the share of common stock being offered.

        We have agreed that we will not offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, or file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement under the Securities Act relating to, any shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any shares of our common stock, or publicly disclose the intention to make any offer, sale, pledge, disposition or filing, without the prior written consent of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC for a period of            days after the date of this prospectus, subject to certain exceptions.

        However, in the event that either (1) during the last            days of the "lock-up" period, we release earnings results or material news or a material event relating to us occurs or (2) prior to the expiration of the "lock-up" period, we announce that we will release earnings results during the            

175


Table of Contents


-day period beginning on the last day of the "lock-up" period, then in either case the expiration of the "lock-up" will be extended until the expiration of the             -day period beginning on the date of the release of the earnings results or the occurrence of the material news or event, as applicable, unless Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC waives, in writing, such an extension.

        Our officers and directors and Rio Tinto America (collectively, the restricted shareholders) have agreed that they will not offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any shares of our common stock, enter into a transaction that would have the same effect, or enter into any swap, hedge or other arrangement that transfers, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of our common stock, whether any of these transactions are to be settled by delivery of our common stock or other securities, in cash or otherwise, or publicly disclose the intention to make any offer, sale, pledge or disposition, or to enter into any transaction, swap, hedge or other arrangement, without, in each case, the prior written consent of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC for a period of            days after the date of this prospectus, subject to certain exceptions.

        In addition, our restricted shareholders have agreed that, without the prior written consent of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, they will not, during the "lock-up" period, make any demand for or exercise any right with respect to, the registration of any common stock or any security convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for the common stock. However, in the event that either (1) during the last             days of the "lock-up" period, we release earnings results or material news or a material event relating to us occurs or (2) prior to the expiration of the "lock-up" period, we announce that we will release earnings results during the            -day period beginning on the last day of the initial "lock-up" period, then in each case the expiration of the "lock-up" will be extended until the expiration of the            -day period beginning on the date of the release of the earnings results or the occurrence of the material news or event, as applicable, unless Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC waives, in writing, such an extension.

        The underwriters have reserved for sale at the initial public offering price up to                        shares of the common stock for employees and directors who have expressed an interest in purchasing common stock in the offering. The number of shares available for sale to the general public in the offering will be reduced to the extent these persons purchase the reserved shares. Any reserved shares not so purchased will be offered by the underwriters to the general public on the same terms as the other shares.

        We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against liabilities under the Securities Act, or contribute to payments that the underwriters may be required to make in that respect.

        We have applied to list the shares of common stock on the NYSE under the symbol "CLD."

        Certain of the underwriters and their respective affiliates have from time to time performed, and may in the future perform, various financial advisory, commercial banking and investment banking services for us and for our affiliates in the ordinary course of business for which they have received and would receive customary compensation. Certain underwriters in this offering will participate in the concurrent offering of our Series A Preferred Stock.

        Immediately prior to this offering, there has been no market for our common stock. The initial public offering price will be determined by negotiation between us and the underwriters and will not necessarily reflect the market price of the common stock following this offering. The principal factors that will be considered in determining the public offering price will include:

176


Table of Contents

        We offer no assurances that the initial public offering price will correspond to the price at which the common stock will trade in the public market subsequent to this offering or that an active trading market for the common stock will develop and continue after this offering.

        In connection with this offering, the underwriters may engage in stabilizing transactions, over-allotment transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids in accordance with Regulation M under the Exchange Act.

        These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining the market price of our common stock or preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of the common stock. As a result the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that might otherwise exist in the open market. These transactions may be effected on the New York Stock Exchange or otherwise and, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time.

        A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the web sites maintained by one or more of the underwriters, or selling group members, if any, participating in this offering and one or more of the underwriters participating in this offering may distribute prospectuses electronically. The representatives may agree to allocate a number of shares to underwriters and selling group members for sale to their online brokerage account holders. Internet distributions will be allocated by the

177


Table of Contents


underwriters and selling group members that will make internet distributions on the same basis as other allocations.

European Economic Area

        In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a Relevant Member State), each underwriter represents and agrees that with effect from and including the date on which the Prospectus Directive is implemented in that Relevant Member State (the Relevant Implementation Date) it has not made and will not make an offer of shares of common stock to the public in that Relevant Member State except that it may, with effect from and including the Relevant Implementation Date, make an offer of shares of common stock to the public in that Relevant Member State at any time,

        For the purposes of this provision, the expression an "offer of Shares to the public" in relation to any shares of common stock in any Relevant Member State means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the shares of common stock to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the shares of common stock, as the same may be varied in that Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Member State and the expression Prospectus Directive means Directive 2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing measure in each Relevant Member State.

178


Table of Contents


LEGAL MATTERS

        The validity of the shares of common stock being offered in this prospectus and other legal matters concerning this offering will be passed upon for us by Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, New York, New York. Certain legal matters related to the sale of the common stock issued in this offering will be passed upon for the underwriters by Davis Polk & Wardwell, New York, New York.


EXPERTS

        The audited financial statements of Rio Tinto Energy America Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 included in this Prospectus, except as they relate to Decker Coal Company, have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, and, insofar as they relate to Decker Coal Company, by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, whose report thereon appears herein. Such financial statements have been so included in reliance on the reports of such independent registered public accounting firms given on the authority of such firms as experts in auditing and accounting.


EXPERTS – COAL RESERVES

        The estimates of our proven and probable coal reserves referred to in this prospectus have been prepared by us and reviewed by John T. Boyd Company and have been included herein upon the authority of this firm as an expert.


WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

        We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the common stock we propose to sell in this offering. This prospectus, which constitutes part of the registration statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement. For further information about us and the common stock we propose to sell in this offering, we refer you to the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules filed as a part of the registration statement. Statements contained in this prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement are not necessarily complete. If a contract or document has been filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, we refer you to the copy of the contract or document that has been filed as an exhibit to the registration statement. When we complete this offering, we will also be required to file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

        You can read our Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including the registration statement, over the Internet at the Securities and Exchange Commission's website at www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy any document we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission at its public reference facility at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may also obtain copies of the documents at prescribed rates by writing to the Public Reference Section of the Securities and Exchange Commission at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference facilities.

179


Table of Contents


GLOSSARY OF SELECTED TERMS

         Appalachian Region.    Coal producing area in Alabama, eastern Kentucky, Maryland, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia. The Appalachian Region is divided into the northern, central and southern Appalachian regions.

         Ash.    Inorganic material consisting of iron, alumina, sodium and other incombustible matter that are contained in coal. The composition of the ash can affect the burning characteristics of coal.

         Bituminous coal.    The most common type of coal that is between sub-bituminous and anthracite in rank. Bituminous coals produced from the central and eastern U.S. coal fields typically have moisture content less than 20% by weight and heating value of 10,500 to 14,000 Btus.

         British thermal unit, or "Btu."    A measure of the thermal energy required to raise the temperature of one pound of pure liquid water one degree Fahrenheit at the temperature at which water has its greatest density (39 degrees Fahrenheit).

         BNSF.    Burlington Northern Santa Fe

         Central Appalachia.    Coal producing area in eastern Kentucky, Virginia and southern West Virginia.

         Coal seam.    Coal deposits occur in layers typically separated by layers of rock. Each layer is called a "seam." A seam can vary in thickness from inches to a hundred feet or more.

         Coalbed methane.    Also referred to as CBM or coalbed natural gas (CBNG). Coalbed methane is methane gas formed during the coalification process and stored within the coal seam.

         Coke.    A hard, dry carbon substance produced by heating coal to a very high temperature in the absence of air. Coke is used in the manufacture of iron and steel.

         Compliance coal.    Coal that when combusted emits no greater than 1.2 pounds of sulfur dioxide per million Btus and requires no blending or sulfur-reduction technology to comply with current sulfur dioxide emissions under the Clean Air Act.

         Dragline.    A large excavating machine used in the surface mining process to remove overburden. The dragline has a large bucket suspended from the end of a boom, which may be 275 feet long or larger. The bucket is suspended by cables and capable of scooping up significant amounts of overburden as it is pulled across the excavation area. The dragline, which can "walk" on large pontoon-like "feet," is one of the largest land-based machines in the world.

         EIA.    Energy Information Administration

         Fossil fuel.    A hydrocarbon such as coal, petroleum or natural gas that may be used as a fuel.

         GW.    Gigawatts

         Highwalls.    The unexcavated face of exposed overburden and coal in a surface mine.

         ISO 14001.    Management tool enabling an organization of any size or type to identify and control the environmental impact of its activities, products or services, improve its environmental performance continually, and implement a systematic approach to setting environmental objectives and targets, to achieving these and to demonstrating that they have been achieved.

         Illinois Basin.    Coal producing area in Illinois, Indiana and western Kentucky.

180


Table of Contents

         Incident Rate.    The rate of injury occurrence, as determined by MSHA, based on 200,000 hours of employee exposure and calculated as follows:

IR = (number of cases × 200,000) / hours of employee exposure.

         Interior Region.    Coal producing area consisting of the Illinois Basin, Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.

         LBA.    Lease by Application. Before a mining company can obtain new coal leases on federal land, the company must nominate lands for lease. The Bureau of Land Management, or BLM, then reviews the proposed tract to ensure maximum coal recovery. It also requires completion of a detailed environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement, and then schedules a competitive lease sale. Lease sales must meet fair market value. The process is known as Lease By Application. After a lease is awarded, the BLM also has the responsibility to assure development of the resource is conducted in a fashion that achieves maximum economic recovery. For a more complete description of the LBA process, see "Business—Reserve Acquisition Process."

         Lbs SO2/mmBtu.    Pounds of SO2 emitted per million Btu of heat generated.

         Lignite.    The lowest rank of coal. It is brownish-black with a high moisture content commonly above 35% by weight and heating value commonly less than 8,000 Btu.

         Metallurgical coal.    The various grades of coal suitable for carbonization to make coke for steel manufacture. Also known as "met" coal, it possesses four important qualities: volatility, which affects coke yield; the level of impurities, which affects coke quality; composition, which affects coke strength; and basic characteristics, which affect coke oven safety. Met coal has a particularly high Btu, but low ash content.

         MSHA.    Mine Safety and Health Administration

         NOx.    Nitrogen oxides. NOx represents both NO2 and NO3 which are gases formed in high temperature environments such as coal combustion. It is a harmful pollutant that contributes to acid rain and is a precursor of ozone.

         NMA.    National Mining Association

         Non-reserve coal deposits.    Non-reserve coal deposits are coal bearing bodies that have been sufficiently sampled and analyzed in trenches, outcrops, drilling and underground workings to assume continuity between sample points, and therefore warrant further exploration work. However, this coal does not qualify as commercially viable coal reserves as prescribed by SEC standards until a final comprehensive evaluation based on unit cost per ton, recoverability, and other material factors concludes legal and economic feasibility. Non-reserve coal deposits may be classified as such by either limited property control or geologic limitation, or both.

         Northern Appalachia.    Coal producing area in Maryland, Ohio, Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia.

         Overburden.    Layers of earth and rock covering a coal seam. In surface mining operations, overburden is removed prior to coal extraction.

         PRB.    Powder River Basin. Coal producing area in northeastern Wyoming and southeastern Montana.

         Preparation plant.    Usually located on a mine site, although one plant may serve several mines. A preparation plant is a facility for crushing, sizing and washing coal to prepare it for use by a particular

181


Table of Contents


customer. The washing process separates higher ash coal and may also remove some of the coal's sulfur content.

         Probable reserves.    Reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.

         Proven reserves.    Reserves for which: (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling; and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well-established.

         Reclamation.    The process of restoring land to its prior condition, productive use or other permitted condition following mining activities. The process commonly includes "recontouring" or reshaping the land to its approximate original appearance, restoring topsoil and planting native grass and shrubs. Reclamation operations are typically conducted concurrently with mining operations. Reclamation is closely regulated by both state and federal laws.

         Reserve.    That part of a mineral deposit that could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination.

         Riparian habitat.    Areas adjacent to rivers and streams with a differing density, diversity, and productivity of plant and animal species relative to nearby uplands.

         Riverine habitat.    A habitat occurring along a river.

         Scrubber.    Any of several forms of chemical physical devices which operate to control sulfur compounds formed during coal combustion. An example of a scrubber is a flue gas desulfurization unit.

         Spoil-piles.    Pile used for any dumping of waste material or overburden material, particularly used during the dragline method of mining.

         Steam coal.    Coal used by power plants and industrial steam boilers to produce electricity or process steam. It generally is lower in Btu heat content and higher in volatile matter than metallurgical coal.

         Sub-bituminous coal.    Black coal that ranks between lignite and bituminous coal. Sub-bituminous coal produced from the PRB has a moisture content between 20% to over 30% by weight, and its heat content ranges from 8,000 to 9,500 Btus of coal.

         Sulfur.    One of the elements present in varying quantities in coal that contributes to environmental degradation when coal is burned. Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is produced as a gaseous by-product of coal combustion.

         Sulfur dioxide emission allowance.    A tradeable authorization to emit sulfur dioxide. Under Title IV of the Clean Air Act, one allowance permits the emission of one ton of sulfur dioxide.

         Surface mine.    A mine in which the coal lies near the surface and can be extracted by removing the covering layer of soil overburden. Surface mines are also known as open-pit mines.

         Tons.    A "short" or net ton is equal to 2,000 pounds. A "long" or British ton is 2,240 pounds. A "metric" tonne is approximately 2,205 pounds. The short ton is the unit of measure referred to in this prospectus.

         Truck and shovel mining and Truck and Front-End Loader Mining.    Similar forms of mining where large shovels or front-end loaders are used to remove overburden, which is used to backfill pits after the coal is removed. Smaller shovels load coal in haul trucks for transportation to the preparation plant or rail loadout.

         Uinta Basin.    Coal producing area in western Colorado and eastern Utah.

182



CLOUD PEAK ENERGY INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
  Page

Rio Tinto Energy America Inc. and subsidiaries:

   
 

Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2008 (Restated)

  F-2
 

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and 2008 (Restated)

  F-3
 

Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholder's Equity for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 (Restated)

  F-4
 

Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and 2008

  F-5
 

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

  F-6
 

Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008

  F-13
 

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2008

  F-14
 

Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholder's Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

  F-15
 

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2008

  F-16
 

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

  F-17
 

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms

  F-24
 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2007

  F-26
 

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007

  F-27
 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007

  F-28
 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007

  F-29
 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

  F-30

F-1


RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2007 and MARCH 31, 2008

(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

 
  December 31,
2007
  March 31, 2008
(Restated)
 

ASSETS

             

Current assets

             

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 23,632   $ 23,864  

Restricted cash

    2,077     5,431  

Accounts receivable, net

    121,754     129,522  

Restricted accounts receivable

    1,424     1,262  

Inventories, net

    76,023     78,760  

Deferred income taxes

    30,072     30,447  

Refundable deposit

    24,397     8,759  

Other assets

    1,747     12,000  
           
 

Total current assets

    281,126     290,045  

Property, plant and equipment, net

    1,344,246     1,328,880  

Intangible assets, net

    94,933     75,819  

Goodwill, net

    35,634     35,634  

Other assets

    9,073     9,737  
           
 

Total assets

  $ 1,765,012   $ 1,740,115  
           

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY

             

Current liabilities

             

Accounts payable

  $ 90,380   $ 76,030  

Royalties and production taxes

    123,053     134,465  

Accrued expenses

    41,220     52,244  

Due to related parties

    159,025     147,999  

Current portion of long-term debt—bonds

    7,918     7,918  

Current portion of long-term debt—other

    34,689     36,122  
           
 

Total current liabilities

    456,285     454,778  

Long-term debt—related party

    500,627     496,540  

Long-term debt—bonds

    132,038     132,038  

Long-term debt—other

    45,117     17,365  

Asset retirement obligations

    224,938     224,883  

Deferred income taxes

    110,968     111,741  

Other liabilities

    7,440     6,352  
           
 

Total liabilities

    1,477,413     1,443,697  
           

Contingencies (Note 5)

             

Shareholder's equity

             

Common stock ($0.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized; 1 share issued and outstanding at December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2008)

         

Additional paid-in capital

    166,654     168,666  

Retained earnings

    122,683     129,490  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

    (1,738 )   (1,738 )
           
 

Total shareholder's equity

    287,599     296,418  
           
 

Total liabilities and shareholder's equity

  $ 1,765,012   $ 1,740,115  
           

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-2


RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 and 2008

(dollars in thousands)

 
  2007   2008
(Restated)
 

Revenues

  $ 364,375   $ 423,481  

Costs and expenses

             
 

Cost of product sold (exclusive of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion shown separately below)

    284,033     328,011  
 

Depreciation and depletion

    33,289     34,930  
 

Amortization

    8,262     19,114  
 

Accretion

    3,649     4,148  
 

Exploration costs

    1,601     294  
 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

    14,902     18,257  
           

Total costs and expenses

    345,736     404,754  
           

Operating income

    18,639     18,727  

Other income (expense)

             
 

Interest income

    2,471     1,331  
 

Interest expense

    (15,420 )   (10,294 )
 

Other, net

    3     (187 )
           

Total other expense

    (12,946 )   (9,150 )
           

Income before income tax provision and earnings from unconsolidated affiliates

    5,693     9,577  
 

Income tax provision

    (425 )   (2,442 )
 

Earnings from unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

    48     1,272  
           

Net income

  $ 5,316   $ 8,407  
           

Net income per share—basic and diluted

             
 

Net income per share

  $ 5,316   $ 8,407  
           
 

Weighted-average shares outstanding

    1     1  
           

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3


RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2008 (Restated)

(dollars in thousands)

 
  Additional
Paid-In Capital
  Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
  Total  

Balance, December 31, 2007

  $ 166,654   $ 122,683   $ (1,738 ) $ 287,599  
 

Other comprehensive income

                         
   

Net income (restated)

        8,407         8,407  
                         
 

Total comprehensive income

                      8,407  
   

Stock compensation, net of tax

    932             932  
   

Dividend to Parent

        (1,600 )       (1,600 )
   

Expenses incurred by Parent

    1,080                 1,080  
                   

Balance, March 31, 2008

  $ 168,666   $ 129,490   $ (1,738 ) $ 296,418  
                   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4


RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 and 2008

(dollars in thousands)

 
  2007   2008  

Cash flows from operating activities

             

Net income (restated in 2008)

  $ 5,316   $ 8,407  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities

             
 

Earnings from unconsolidated affiliates

    (48 )   (1,272 )
 

Depreciation and depletion

    33,289     34,930  
 

Amortization

    8,262     19,114  
 

Accretion

    3,649     4,148  
 

Gain on sale of assets and transfer of liabilities

    (38 )   (122 )
 

Deferred income taxes

    (267 )   (693 )
 

Expenses incurred on the Company's behalf and paid by Parent

    3,300     1,080  
 

Stock option expense

    144     128  
 

Interest expense converted to principal

    9,278     5,886  
 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

             
   

Receivables

    19,727     (7,768 )
   

Inventories, net

    (6,783 )   (2,737 )
   

Due to related parties (restated in 2008)

    8,276     15,503  
   

Other assets

    (7,935 )   (10,050 )
   

Accounts payable, royalties and production taxes and accrued expenses

    9,762     22,586  
   

Asset retirement obligations

    (1,174 )   (1,558 )
           

Net cash provided by operating activities

    84,758     87,582  
           

Cash flows from investing activities

             
 

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

    (20,300 )   (41,742 )
 

Proceeds from sale of assets

    115     459  
 

Increase in restricted cash

    (3,735 )   (3,354 )
 

Proceeds from refundable deposit

        15,638  
 

Distributions from equity investments

    975     1,283  
 

Increase in advances to affiliates

    (39,527 )   (21,423 )
           

Net cash used in investing activities

    (62,472 )   (49,139 )
           

Cash flows from financing activities

             
 

Repayments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations

    (25,098 )   (36,319 )
 

Dividend to Parent

    (95 )   (1,600 )
 

Other

    (12 )   (292 )
           

Net cash used in financing activities

    (25,205 )   (38,211 )
           

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

    (2,919 )   232  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

    19,597     23,632  
           

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $ 16,678   $ 23,864  
           

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5


RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in Thousands)

1. Basis of Presentation

        The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2008 and for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2008, and the notes thereto, have been prepared in accordance with Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting regarding interim financial information, and, accordingly, do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and reflect all adjustments (consisting solely of normal, recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of results for this interim period. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for future periods or for the year ending December 31, 2008.

        As the accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared using the same accounting principles as those used to prepare the annual consolidated financial statements, the accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, included herein.

Restatement

        The accompanying financial statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2008 have been restated to accrue $1,991 of selling, general and administrative expenses from an affiliated entity, which was omitted in the original financial statements as reported. Accordingly, the previously reported net income and net income per share for the three months ended March 31, 2008 were overstated by $1,482. The effects on the statement of operations for this correction resulted in an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses of $1,991, reduction in operating income of $1,991, a decrease in the income tax provision of $509 and a reduction in net income and net income per share of $1,482. The impact of this correction on the balance sheet increased the amounts due to related parties by $1,482 and reduced retained earnings and shareholder's equity by $1,482. The correction had no impact on total operating cash flows for the period. The notes to these unaudited financial statements have been restated to reflect correction of the period-specific effects of this error.

Variable Interest Entities

        Rio Tinto Energy America Inc. and its subsidiaries ("RTEA" or the "Company") includes two variable interest entities in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, Colowyo Coal Company ("Colowyo") and Rio Tinto Energy America Service Company ("RTEASC"). Colowyo is a producer of low, sulfur coal from a surface coal mine in Colorado. As of March 31, 2008, our carrying value of Colowyo total assets were $100,554 and total liabilities were $234,050 including non-recourse bonds (the "Bonds"). RTEASC employs certain RTEA employees and provides management services to RTEA. As of March 31, 2008, RTEASC's total assets and total liabilities were $1,050 and $3,460, respectively.

F-6


RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars in Thousands)

1. Basis of Presentation (Continued)

Allocated Expenses

        The accompanying consolidated financial statements include, on a carve out basis, the accounts of RTEA and its subsidiaries, reflecting the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and changes in cash flows that were directly applicable to the Company. Included within selling, general and administrative costs in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2008 are the Company's share of RTA's general and administrative costs and Rio Tinto headquarters overhead costs of $5,414 and $9,099 respectively. The amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2008 also include $2,447 of costs associated with an initiative by Rio Tinto plc ("Parent") to prepare for the Company's initial public offering.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements ("FAS 157") which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 clarifies how to measure fair value as permitted under other accounting pronouncements, but does not require any new fair value measurements. FAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. On February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 157-2 ("FSP 157-2"), which delayed the effective date of FAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis or at least once a year, to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The provisions of FSP 157-2 are effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009. The Company adopted the provisions of FAS 157 on January 1, 2008, except for those items deferred under FSP 157-2. The adoption of FAS 157 did not have a material effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (FAS 159). FAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. FAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. FAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company did not elect the fair value option under FAS 159 for any of its financial assets or liabilities that are not already required to be presented at fair value and therefore the adoption of FAS 159 had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations ("FAS 141R") and FAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51 ("FAS 160"). FAS 141R and FAS 160 will significantly change the accounting for and reporting of business combination transactions and noncontrolling (minority) interests in consolidated financial statements. FAS 141R retains the fundamental requirements in FAS No. 141, Business Combinations while providing additional definitions, such as the definition of the acquirer in a purchase and improvements in the application of how the acquisition method is applied.

F-7


RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars in Thousands)

1. Basis of Presentation (Continued)


FAS 160 will change the accounting and reporting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests, and classified as a component of equity. Both pronouncements become simultaneously effective January 1, 2009. Early adoption is not permitted. FAS 160 shall be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which it is initially applied, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements. The presentation and disclosure requirements shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that these pronouncements may have on its consolidated financial statements.

        In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 ("FAS 161"). This statement amends SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities ("FAS 133") to require enhanced disclosures about an entity's derivative and hedging activities, including disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FAS 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. FAS 161 encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this pronouncement may have on its consolidated financial statements.

        In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position ("FSP") No. FAS 142-3 Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets, which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and early adoption is prohibited. The guidance for determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset will be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The disclosure requirements will be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of, and subsequent to, the effective date. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this FSP may have on its consolidated financial statements.

        In May 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("FAS 162"). This statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("U.S. GAAP"). FAS 162 applies to financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP and shall be effective sixty days following the Securities and Exchange Commission's approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this pronouncement may have on its consolidated financial statements.

F-8


RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars in Thousands)

2. Inventories, net

        Inventories, net consisted of the following at December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2008:

 
  2007   2008  

Materials and supplies, net

  $ 73,308   $ 75,688  

Coal stockpile and finished product

    2,715     3,072  
           

  $ 76,023   $ 78,760  
           

        Materials and supplies are stated net of an obsolescence allowance of $2,040 and $1,798 at December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2008, respectively. The Company increased (decreased) the provision for obsolescence by $339 and $(226) and utilized $7 and $15, for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively.

3. Intangible Assets

        In March 2008, an unincorporated joint venture of the Company executed a buyout agreement on an existing long-term coal supply contract. The buyout agreement resulted in termination of the remaining contract. As a result of the buyout, the Company recorded $6,336 of revenue representing its 50% interest and $9,224 representing the corresponding accelerated amortization of intangible assets related to consolidated contract rights.

4. Income Taxes

        The Company's effective tax rate differs from the United States federal statutory income tax rate for the periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2008, as follows:

 
  2007   2008  

United States federal statutory income tax rate

    35.0 %   35.0 %

State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit

    0.2     0.7  

Depletion

    (24.0 )   (9.9 )

Other

    (3.7 )   (0.3 )
           

Effective tax rate

    7.5 %   25.5 %
           

        Percentage depletion can be limited by a net income limit and other limitations. In 2008, it is anticipated that these limitations will reduce the amount of the depletion deduction relative to the amount of depletion deducted in 2007, which has resulted in an increase in our effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007.

5. Contingencies

Litigation

        The Minerals Management Service ("MMS"), a federal agency with responsibility for collecting royalties on coal produced from federal coal leases, issued two disputed assessments against Decker Coal Company ("Decker"): one for coal produced from 1986-1992, and the other for coal produced from 1993-2001. Both assessments concern coal sold by Decker, and in turn resold under long-term

F-9


RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars in Thousands)

5. Contingencies (Continued)


contracts. The MMS maintains that Decker's royalties should not be based on the prices at which Decker actually sold coal because the MMS does not believe those prices represent the results of arm's length negotiation. With respect to the period 1986-1992, Decker appealed the assessment through the administrative process with the MMS and that appeal was unsuccessful. A further appeal is now pending before the United States District Court for the District of Montana. With respect to the period 1993-2001, the MMS has not issued a final decision concerning Decker's challenge to the assessment. As of December 31, 2007, the estimated additional assessed royalties (inclusive of interest) for the 1986-1992 assessment are approximately $30,000 and estimated additional assessed royalties (inclusive of interest) for the 1993-2001 assessment are approximately $10,000. Decker estimates that even if the assessments were to be upheld, MMS's eventual recovery would be between $0 and $40,000. As a result of RTEA's 50% ownership interest in Decker, the Company's financial results could be materially affected, should Decker be unsuccessful in its appeal. RTEA has not accrued a liability in its consolidated financial statements with respect to this matter as any potential losses are not considered to be probable and reasonably estimable. In addition to its substantive challenges to the assessments, Decker believes that it is indemnified by and/or has contractual price escalation protection with respect to any increased assessments. RTEA considers those conclusions to be reasonable, however has not relied upon this indemnification in reaching its decision that any potential losses are not considered probable and reasonably estimable.

        RTEA currently is party to various other legal proceedings. While management currently believes that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or overall trends in results of operations, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties. If an unfavorable ruling were to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the results of operations, cash flows and financial position of RTEA. The estimate of the potential impact on the Company's financial position or overall results of operations or cash flows for the legal proceedings could change in the future. The Company has accrued for all losses related to litigation that the Company considers probable and for which the loss can be reasonably estimated.

Income Tax Contingencies

        The Company has various tax audits in progress. The Company has provided its best estimate of taxes and related interest and penalties due for potential adjustments that may result from the resolution of various tax audits, and examinations of open United States federal and state tax years.

        The Company's income tax calculations are based on application of the respective United States federal or state tax law. The Company's tax filings, however, are subject to audit by the respective tax authorities. Accordingly, the Company recognizes tax benefits when it is more likely than not a position will be upheld by the tax authorities. To the extent the final tax liabilities are different from the amounts originally accrued, the increases or decreases are recorded as income tax expense.

Guarantees and Off-Balance Sheet Risk

        United States federal and state laws require the Company to secure certain of its obligations to reclaim lands used for mining and to secure coal lease obligations. The primary method used by the Company to meet its reclamation obligations and to secure coal lease obligations is to provide a third-

F-10


RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars in Thousands)

5. Contingencies (Continued)


party surety bond, typically through an insurance company, or provide a letter of credit, typically through a bank. Specific bond and or letter of credit amounts may change over time, depending on the activity at the respective site and any specific requirements by federal or state laws. The changes may be for required increases or decreases to a respective bond or letter of credit amount. The Company considers its surety bonds and letters of credit issued to meet its reclamation obligations and to secure coal lease obligations at the respective mine site to be performance guarantees. At March 31, 2008, the Company had $316,504 of standby of letters of credit and $395,408 of performance bonds outstanding (including the Company's proportional share of Decker) to secure certain of its obligations to reclaim lands used for mining and to secure coal lease obligations. The letters of credit and performance bonds, except for Decker, are executed by RTEA's Parent on RTEA's behalf.

6. Related Party Transactions

Guarantee Fees

        Included in interest expense was $632 and $409 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively, for guarantee fees paid to Rio Tinto plc associated with the outstanding standby letters of credit and performance bonds. The letters of credit and performance bonds are executed by RTEA's Parent on RTEA's behalf.

Cash Management Arrangement and Reimbursed Overhead

        Under a cash management arrangement with Kennecott Holdings Corporation ("KHC"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of RTA, cash is transferred to and from KHC on a regular basis for investment purposes. Balances resulting from these transactions bear interest at the same rate as the RTA Facility (4.3% as of March 31, 2008). Amounts due from related parties resulting from these transactions are included in the table below. Interest income related to transactions with KHC totaled $2,185 and $1,127 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively.

        KHC and Rio Tinto Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of RTA, also fund certain Company overhead expenses which are reimbursed by the Company. Amounts due to related parties resulting from these transactions are non-interest bearing and are included in the table below.

        Due from (to) related parties consisted of the following at December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2008:

 
  2007   2008
(restated)
 

Kennecott Holdings Corporation:

             
 

Cash management arrangement

  $ 82,728   $ 104,151  
 

Reimbursed overhead

    (238,097 )   (250,766 )

Rio Tinto America:

             
 

Income tax sharing agreement

    (2,968 )   (4,555 )

Other

    (688 )   3,171  
           

  $ (159,025 ) $ (147,999 )
           

F-11


RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars in Thousands)

6. Related Party Transactions (Continued)

        The Company paid cash in excess of expense of $95 and $1,600 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively, to RTA related to Rio Tinto stock option plans and its federal tax sharing agreement. These amounts have been reflected as dividends to the Parent in the accompanying financial statements.

7. Segment Information

        The Company reviews, manages and operates its business as a single operating segment, coal production. The following table presents a summary of total revenues from external customers by their geographic location for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2008, as follows:

 
  2007   2008  

United States

  $ 360,809   $ 419,726  

Foreign

    3,566     3,755  
           
 

Total revenues from external customers

  $ 364,375   $ 423,481  
           

        All of the Company's revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2008 originated in the United States.

        The following table presents a reconciliation of Internal reporting EBITDA to net income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2008, as follows:

 
  2007   2008
(restated)
 

Internal reporting EBITDA

  $ 67,962   $ 90,299  

Adjustments

    (4,072 )   (12,295 )
           

EBITDA

    63,890     78,004  

Depreciation and depletion

    (33,289 )   (34,930 )

Amortization

    (8,262 )   (19,114 )

Accretion

    (3,649 )   (4,148 )

Interest income

    2,471     1,331  

Interest expense

    (15,420 )   (10,294 )

Income tax provision

    (425 )   (2,442 )
           

Net income

  $ 5,316   $ 8,407  
           

8. Subsequent Event

        Effective August 1, 2008, RTEA's Cordero Rojo Mine was awarded a $250 million federal coal lease in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming payable over 5 years. The initial payment of $50 million was made in April 2008. On the effective date, the lease will be recognized at present value as an asset in property, plant and equipment, and the remaining present value of the installment payments will be recognized in current and long term liabilities.

F-12


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2007 and JUNE 30, 2008

(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

 
  December 31,
2007
  June 30, 2008  

ASSETS

       

Current assets

             
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 23,632   $ 16,507  
 

Restricted cash

    2,077     1,037  
 

Accounts receivable, net

    121,754     94,717  
 

Restricted accounts receivable

    1,424     1,354  
 

Inventories, net

    76,023     83,235  
 

Deferred income taxes

    30,072     30,447  
 

Refundable deposit

    24,397     53,207  
 

Other assets

    1,747     6,412  
           
   

Total current assets

    281,126     286,916  

Property, plant and equipment, net

    1,344,246     1,325,536  

Intangible assets, net

    94,933     66,530  

Goodwill

    35,634     35,634  

Other assets

    9,073     12,031  
           
 

Total assets

  $ 1,765,012   $ 1,726,647  
           

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY

       

Current liabilities

             
 

Accounts payable

  $ 90,380   $ 72,815  
 

Royalties and production taxes

    123,053     126,204  
 

Accrued expenses

    41,220     49,872  
 

Due to related parties

    159,025     106,053  
 

Current portion of long-term debt—bonds

    7,918     8,653  
 

Current portion of long-term debt—other

    34,689     36,144  
           
   

Total current liabilities

    456,285     399,741  

Long-term debt—related party

    500,627     541,879  

Long-term debt—bonds

    132,038     127,522  

Long-term debt—other

    45,117     17,579  

Asset retirement obligations

    224,938     226,780  

Deferred income taxes

    110,968     112,061  

Other liabilities

    7,440     5,483  
           
 

Total liabilities

    1,477,413     1,431,045  
           

Contingencies (Note 5)

             

Shareholder's equity

             
 

Common stock ($0.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized; 1 share issued and outstanding at December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008)

         
 

Additional paid-in capital

    166,654     171,117  
 

Retained earnings

    122,683     126,223  
 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

    (1,738 )   (1,738 )
           
   

Total shareholder's equity

    287,599     295,602  
           
   

Total liabilities and shareholder's equity

  $ 1,765,012   $ 1,726,647  
           

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-13


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 and 2008

(dollars in thousands)

 
  2007   2008  

Revenues

  $ 726,713   $ 845,140  

Costs and expenses

             
 

Cost of product sold (exclusive of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion shown separately below)

    567,666     670,671  
 

Depreciation and depletion

    67,183     73,465  
 

Amortization

    16,871     28,403  
 

Accretion

    7,244     8,294  
 

Exploration costs

    2,943     1,404  
 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

    27,653     39,976  
           

Total costs and expenses

    689,560     822,213  
           

Operating income

    37,153     22,927  

Other income (expense)

             
 

Interest income

    4,408     2,614  
 

Interest expense

    (27,941 )   (18,991 )
 

Other, net

    46     (291 )
           

Total other expense

    (23,487 )   (16,668 )
           

Income before income tax provision and earnings from unconsolidated affiliates

    13,666     6,259  
 

Income tax provision

    (1,043 )   (1,596 )
 

Earnings from unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

    863     2,210  
           

Net income

  $ 13,486   $ 6,873  
           

Net income per share—basic and diluted

             
 

Net income per share

  $ 13,486   $ 6,873  
           
 

Weighted-average shares outstanding

    1     1  
           

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-14


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2008

(dollars in thousands)

 
  Additional
Paid-In Capital
  Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
  Total  

Balance, December 31, 2007

  $ 166,654   $ 122,683   $ (1,738 ) $ 287,599  
 

Other comprehensive income

                         
   

Net income

        6,873         6,873  
                         
 

Total comprehensive income

                      6,873  
   

Stock compensation, net of tax

    1,233             1,233  
   

Dividend to Parent

        (3,333 )       (3,333 )
   

Expenses incurred by Parent

    1,080             1,080  
   

Contribution from partners

    2,150             2,150  
                   

Balance, June 30, 2008

  $ 171,117   $ 126,223   $ (1,738 ) $ 295,602  
                   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-15


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 and 2008

(dollars in thousands)

 
  2007   2008  

Cash flows from operating activities

             

Net income

  $ 13,486   $ 6,873  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities

             
 

Earnings from unconsolidated affiliates

    (863 )   (2,210 )
 

Depreciation and depletion

    67,183     73,465  
 

Amortization

    16,871     28,403  
 

Accretion

    7,244     8,294  
 

(Gain) loss on sale of assets and transfer of liabilities

    (114 )   889  
 

Deferred income taxes

    (1,238 )   (899 )
 

Expenses incurred on the Company's behalf and paid by Parent

    6,599     1,080  
 

Stock option expense

    338     425  
 

Interest expense converted to principal

    17,721     9,894  
 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

             
   

Receivables

    4,766     27,037  
   

Inventories, net

    (7,259 )   (7,212 )
   

Due to related parties

    24,406     (130,254 )
   

Other assets

    (8,926 )   (5,382 )
   

Accounts payable, royalties and production taxes and accrued expenses

    318     12,864  
   

Asset retirement obligations

    (2,983 )   (3,620 )
           

Net cash provided by operating activities

    137,549     19,647  
           

Cash flows from investing activities

             
 

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

    (69,744 )   (80,795 )
 

Proceeds from sale of assets

    151     464  
 

Increase in restricted cash

    549     1,040  
 

Payment on refundable deposit

        (53,207 )
 

Receipt on refundable deposit

        24,397  
 

Distributions from equity investments

    975     1,283  
 

Change in cash advances to affiliates

    51,339     82,387  
           

Net cash used in investing activities

    (16,730 )   (24,431 )
           

Cash flows from financing activities

             
 

Borrowings on long-term debt and capital lease obligations

        40,000  
 

Repayments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations

    (117,086 )   (39,864 )
 

Dividend to Parent

    (1,533 )   (3,333 )
 

Other

    103     856  
           

Net cash used in financing activities

    (118,516 )   (2,341 )
           

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

    2,303     (7,125 )

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

    19,597     23,632  
           

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $ 21,900   $ 16,507  
           

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-16


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in Thousands)

1. Basis of Presentation

        The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2008 and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, and the notes thereto, have been prepared in accordance with Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting regarding interim financial information, and, accordingly, do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and reflect all adjustments (consisting solely of normal, recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of results for this interim period. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for future periods or for the year ending December 31, 2008.

        As the accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared using the same accounting principles as those used to prepare the annual consolidated financial statements, the accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, included herein.

Variable Interest Entities

        Rio Tinto Energy America Inc. and its subsidiaries ("RTEA" or the "Company") includes two variable interest entities in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, Colowyo Coal Company ("Colowyo") and Rio Tinto Energy America Service Company ("RTEASC"). Colowyo is a producer of low, sulfur coal from a surface coal mine in Colorado. As of June 30, 2008, our carrying value of Colowyo total assets were $101,391 and total liabilities were $247,045 including non-recourse bonds (the "Bonds"). RTEASC employs certain RTEA employees and provides management services to RTEA. As of June 30, 2008, RTEASC's total assets and total liabilities were $534 and $1,890, respectively.

Allocated Expenses

        The accompanying consolidated financial statements include, on a carve out basis, the accounts of RTEA and its subsidiaries, reflecting the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and changes in cash flows that were directly applicable to the Company. Included within selling, general and administrative costs in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 are the Company's share of RTA's general and administrative costs and Rio Tinto headquarters overhead costs of $10,861 and $22,389, respectively. The amounts for the six months ended June 30, 2008 also include $10,226 of costs associated with an initiative by Rio Tinto plc ("Parent") to prepare for the Company's initial public offering.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements ("FAS 157") which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 clarifies how to measure fair value as

F-17


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars in Thousands)

1. Basis of Presentation (Continued)


permitted under other accounting pronouncements, but does not require any new fair value measurements. FAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. On February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 157-2 ("FSP 157-2"), which delayed the effective date of FAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis or at least once a year, to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The provisions of FSP 157-2 are effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009. The Company adopted the provisions of FAS 157 on January 1, 2008, except for those items deferred under FSP 157-2. The adoption of FAS 157 did not have a material effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (FAS 159). FAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. FAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. FAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company did not elect the fair value option under FAS 159 for any of its financial assets or liabilities that are not already required to be presented at fair value and therefore the adoption of FAS 159 had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations ("FAS 141R") and FAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51 ("FAS 160"). FAS 141R and FAS 160 will significantly change the accounting for and reporting of business combination transactions and noncontrolling (minority) interests in consolidated financial statements. FAS 141R retains the fundamental requirements in FAS No. 141, Business Combinations while providing additional definitions, such as the definition of the acquirer in a purchase and improvements in the application of how the acquisition method is applied. FAS 160 will change the accounting and reporting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests, and classified as a component of equity. Both pronouncements become simultaneously effective January 1, 2009. Early adoption is not permitted. FAS 160 shall be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which it is initially applied, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements. The presentation and disclosure requirements shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that these pronouncements may have on its consolidated financial statements.

        In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 ("FAS 161"). This statement amends SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities ("FAS 133") to require enhanced disclosures about an entity's derivative and hedging activities, including disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FAS 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after

F-18


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars in Thousands)

1. Basis of Presentation (Continued)


November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. FAS 161 encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this pronouncement may have on its consolidated financial statements.

        In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position ("FSP") No. FAS 142-3 Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets, which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and early adoption is prohibited. The guidance for determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset will be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The disclosure requirements will be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of, and subsequent to, the effective date. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this FSP may have on its consolidated financial statements.

        In May 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("FAS 162"). This statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("U.S. GAAP"). FAS 162 applies to financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP and shall be effective sixty days following the Securities and Exchange Commission's approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this pronouncement may have on its consolidated financial statements.

2. Inventories, net

        Inventories, net consisted of the following at December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008:

 
  2007   2008  

Materials and supplies, net

  $ 73,308   $ 81,323  

Coal stockpile and finished product

    2,715     1,912  
           

  $ 76,023   $ 83,235  
           

        Materials and supplies are stated net of an obsolescence allowance of $2,040 and $1,858 at December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, respectively. The Company increased (decreased) the provision for obsolescence by $684 and $(31) and utilized $24 and $151, for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively.

3. Intangible Assets

        In March 2008, an unincorporated joint venture of the Company executed a buyout agreement on an existing long-term coal supply contract. The buyout agreement resulted in termination of the remaining contract. As a result of the buyout, the Company recorded $6,336 of revenue representing its

F-19


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars in Thousands)

3. Intangible Assets (Continued)


50% interest and $9,224 representing the corresponding accelerated amortization of intangible assets related to consolidated contract rights.

4. Income Taxes

        The Company's effective tax rate differs from the United States federal statutory income tax rate for the periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, as follows:

 
  2007   2008  

United States federal statutory income tax rate

    35.0 %   35.0 %

State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit

    0.2     0.7  

Depletion

    (24.0 )   (9.9 )

Other

    (3.6 )   (0.3 )
           

Effective tax rate

    7.6 %   25.5 %
           

        Percentage depletion can be limited by a net income limit and other limitations. In 2008, it is anticipated that these limitations will reduce the amount of the depletion deduction relative to the amount of depletion deducted in 2007, which has resulted in an increase in our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007.

5. Contingencies

Litigation

        The Minerals Management Service ("MMS"), a federal agency with responsibility for collecting royalties on coal produced from federal coal leases, issued two disputed assessments against Decker Coal Company ("Decker"): one for coal produced from 1986-1992, and the other for coal produced from 1993-2001. Both assessments concern coal sold by Decker, and in turn resold under long-term contracts. The MMS maintains that Decker's royalties should not be based on the prices at which Decker actually sold coal because the MMS does not believe those prices represent the results of arm's length negotiation. With respect to the period 1986-1992, Decker appealed the assessment through the administrative process with the MMS and that appeal was unsuccessful. A further appeal is now pending before the United States District Court for the District of Montana. With respect to the period 1993-2001, the MMS has not issued a final decision concerning Decker's challenge to the assessment. As of December 31, 2007, the estimated additional assessed royalties (inclusive of interest) for the 1986-1992 assessment are approximately $30,000 and estimated additional assessed royalties (inclusive of interest) for the 1993-2001 assessment are approximately $10,000. Decker estimates that even if the assessments were to be upheld, MMS's eventual recovery would be between $0 and $40,000. As a result of RTEA's 50% ownership interest in Decker, the Company's financial results could be materially affected, should Decker be unsuccessful in its appeal. RTEA has not accrued a liability in its consolidated financial statements with respect to this matter as any potential losses are not considered to be probable and reasonably estimable. In addition to its substantive challenges to the assessments, Decker believes that it is indemnified by and/or has contractual price escalation protection with respect to any increased assessments. RTEA considers those conclusions to be reasonable, however has not

F-20


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars in Thousands)

5. Contingencies (Continued)


relied upon this indemnification in reaching its decision that any potential losses are not considered probable and reasonably estimable.

        RTEA currently is party to various other legal proceedings. While management currently believes that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or overall trends in results of operations, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties. If an unfavorable ruling were to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the results of operations, cash flows and financial position of RTEA. The estimate of the potential impact on the Company's financial position or overall results of operations or cash flows for the legal proceedings could change in the future. The Company has accrued for all losses related to litigation that the Company considers probable and for which the loss can be reasonably estimated.

Income Tax Contingencies

        The Company has various tax audits in progress. The Company has provided its best estimate of taxes and related interest and penalties due for potential adjustments that may result from the resolution of various tax audits, and examinations of open United States federal and state tax years.

        The Company's income tax calculations are based on application of the respective United States federal or state tax law. The Company's tax filings, however, are subject to audit by the respective tax authorities. Accordingly, the Company recognizes tax benefits when it is more likely than not a position will be upheld by the tax authorities. To the extent the final tax liabilities are different from the amounts originally accrued, the increases or decreases are recorded as income tax expense.

Guarantees and Off-Balance Sheet Risk

        United States federal and state laws require the Company to secure certain of its obligations to reclaim lands used for mining and to secure coal lease obligations. The primary method used by the Company to meet its reclamation obligations and to secure coal lease obligations is to provide a third-party surety bond, typically through an insurance company, or provide a letter of credit, typically through a bank. Specific bond and or letter of credit amounts may change over time, depending on the activity at the respective site and any specific requirements by federal or state laws. The changes may be for required increases or decreases to a respective bond or letter of credit amount. The Company considers its surety bonds and letters of credit issued to meet its reclamation obligations and to secure coal lease obligations at the respective mine site to be performance guarantees. At June 30, 2008, the Company had $328,203 of standby of letters of credit and $416,408 of performance bonds outstanding (including the Company's proportional share of Decker) to secure certain of its obligations to reclaim lands used for mining and to secure coal lease obligations. The letters of credit and performance bonds, except for Decker, are executed by RTEA's Parent on RTEA's behalf.

6. Related Party Transactions

Guarantee Fees

        Included in interest expense was $1,281 and $409 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively, for guarantee fees paid to Rio Tinto plc associated with the outstanding standby

F-21


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars in Thousands)

6. Related Party Transactions (Continued)


letters of credit and performance bonds. The letters of credit and performance bonds are executed by RTEA's Parent on RTEA's behalf.

Cash Management Arrangement and Reimbursed Overhead

        Under a cash management arrangement with Kennecott Holdings Corporation ("KHC"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of RTA, cash is transferred to and from KHC on a regular basis for investment purposes. Balances resulting from these transactions bear interest at the same rate as the RTA Facility (4.3% as of June 30, 2008). Amounts due from related parties resulting from these transactions are included in the table below. Interest income related to transactions with KHC totaled $3,615 and $2,119 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively.

        KHC and Rio Tinto Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of RTA, also fund certain Company overhead expenses which are reimbursed by the Company. Amounts due to related parties resulting from these transactions are non-interest bearing and are included in the table below.

        Due from (to) related parties consisted of the following at December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008:

 
  2007   2008  

Kennecott Holdings Corporation:

             
 

Cash management arrangement

  $ 82,728   $ 341  
 

Reimbursed overhead

    (238,097 )   (83,106 )

Rio Tinto America:

             
 

Income tax sharing agreement

    (2,968 )   (18,067 )

Other

    (688 )   (5,221 )
           

  $ (159,025 ) $ (106,053 )
           

        The Company paid cash in excess of expense of $1,533 and $3,333 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively, to RTA related to Rio Tinto stock option plans and its federal tax sharing agreement. These amounts have been reflected as dividends to the Parent in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

7. Segment Information

        The Company reviews, manages and operates its business as a single operating segment, coal production. The following table presents a summary of total revenues from external customers by their geographic location for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, as follows:

 
  2007   2008  

United States

  $ 717,423   $ 837,017  

Foreign

    9,290     8,123  
           
 

Total revenues from external customers

  $ 726,713   $ 845,140  
           

        All of the Company's revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 originated in the United States.

F-22


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Dollars in Thousands)

7. Segment Information (Continued)

        The following table presents a reconciliation of Internal reporting EBITDA to net income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, as follows:

 
  2007   2008  

Internal reporting EBITDA

  $ 139,250   $ 176,440  

Adjustments

    (9,890 )   (41,432 )
           

EBITDA

    129,360     135,008  

Depreciation and depletion

    (67,183 )   (73,465 )

Amortization

    (16,871 )   (28,403 )

Accretion

    (7,244 )   (8,294 )

Interest income

    4,408     2,614  

Interest expense

    (27,941 )   (18,991 )

Income tax provision

    (1,043 )   (1,596 )
           

Net income

  $ 13,486   $ 6,873  
           

8. Commitments

        In April 2008, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase land whereby the seller may require the Company to pay a purchase price of $23,678 between April 2013 and April 2018. The Company will record a liability in the accompanying consolidated financial statements upon execution of the land sale.

9. Subsequent Events

        Effective August 1, 2008, RTEA's Cordero Rojo Mine was awarded a $250,800 federal coal lease in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming payable over 5 years. The initial payment of $50,160 was made in April 2008 and is reflected as a deposit within current assets on the accompanying balance sheet at June 30, 2008. On the effective date, the lease will be recognized at present value as an asset in property, plant and equipment, and the remaining present value of the installment payments will be recognized in current and long-term liabilities.

F-23


Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Rio Tinto Energy America Inc.:

        In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholder's equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Rio Tinto Energy America Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") at December 31, 2006 and 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of Decker Coal Company, a 50% joint venture, to which the Company applies proportional consolidation, which statements reflect total assets of $87,050,519 and $94,296,268 as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and total revenues of $87,295,432, $76,559,886 and $76,232,415 for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 (of which the Company reflects its 50% proportionate share of the joint venture in the accompanying consolidated financial statements). Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report thereon has been furnished to us, and our opinion expressed herein, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for the Decker Coal Company, is based solely on the report of the other auditors. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for uncertain tax positions effective January 1, 2007 and changed its methods of accounting for share-based payments and stripping costs incurred during the production phase effective January 1, 2006.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Denver, Colorado
August 7, 2008

F-24


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Mine Management Committee
Decker Coal Company

        We have audited the balance sheets of Decker Coal Company (A Joint Venture) (the Company) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statements of earnings and comprehensive income, joint venture deficit, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Decker Coal Company as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

        The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, as of December 31, 2006.

        The Company adopted Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 04-6, Accounting for Stripping Costs Incurred During Production in the Mining Industry, as of January 1, 2006.

KPMG LLP    

Omaha, Nebraska
August 7, 2008

 

 

F-25


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2006 and 2007

(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

 
  2006   2007  

ASSETS

             

Current assets

             
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 19,597   $ 23,632  
 

Restricted cash

    5,855     2,077  
 

Accounts receivable, net

    107,618     121,754  
 

Restricted accounts receivable

    668     1,424  
 

Inventories, net

    64,192     76,023  
 

Deferred income taxes

    29,943     30,072  
 

Refundable deposit

    2,220     24,397  
 

Other assets

    2,967     1,747  
           
   

Total current assets

    233,060     281,126  

Property, plant and equipment, net

    1,295,388     1,344,246  

Intangible assets, net

    137,245     94,933  

Goodwill

    35,634     35,634  

Other assets

    6,904     9,073  
           
   

Total assets

  $ 1,708,231   $ 1,765,012  
           

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY

             

Current liabilities

             
 

Accounts payable

  $ 73,459   $ 90,380  
 

Royalties and production taxes

    106,403     123,053  
 

Accrued expenses

    51,374     41,220  
 

Due to related parties

    74,697     159,025  
 

Current portion of long-term debt—bonds

    6,567     7,918  
 

Current portion of long-term debt—other

    28,452     34,689  
           
   

Total current liabilities

    340,952     456,285  

Long-term debt—related party

    583,181     500,627  

Long-term debt—bonds

    139,956     132,038  

Long-term debt—other

    54,102     45,117  

Asset retirement obligations

    228,958     224,938  

Deferred income taxes

    121,168     110,968  

Other liabilities

    5,775     7,440  
           
   

Total liabilities

    1,474,092     1,477,413  
           

Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)

             

Shareholder's equity

             
 

Common stock ($0.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized; 1 share issued and outstanding at both 2006 and 2007)

         
 

Additional paid-in capital

    143,405     166,654  
 

Retained earnings

    92,585     122,683  
 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

    (1,851 )   (1,738 )
           
   

Total shareholder's equity

    234,139     287,599  
           
   

Total liabilities and shareholder's equity

  $ 1,708,231   $ 1,765,012  
           

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-26


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007

(dollars in thousands)

 
  2005   2006   2007  

Revenues

  $ 1,179,643   $ 1,424,244   $ 1,558,721  

Costs and expenses

                   
 

Cost of product sold (exclusive of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion, shown separately below)

    878,847     1,081,160     1,191,787  
 

Depreciation and depletion

    91,849     122,254     139,167  
 

Amortization

    45,279     44,577     42,312  
 

Accretion

    11,485     14,334     15,665  
 

Exploration costs

    7,037     5,890     10,130  
 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

    48,130     56,873     61,906  
 

Asset impairment charges

            18,297  
               

Total costs and expenses

    1,082,627     1,325,088     1,479,264  
               

Operating income

   
97,016
   
99,156
   
79,457
 

Other income (expense)

                   
 

Interest income

    1,659     3,829     7,577  
 

Interest expense

    (49,570 )   (56,568 )   (54,262 )
 

Other, net

    (358 )   (110 )   99  
               

Total other expense

    (48,269 )   (52,849 )   (46,586 )
               

Income before income tax provision and earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates

   
48,747
   
46,307
   
32,871
 
 

Income tax provision

    (11,194 )   (6,894 )   (2,489 )
 

Earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates,

                   
   

net of tax

    2,209     (1,435 )   2,462  
               

Net income

  $ 39,762   $ 37,978   $ 32,844  
               

Net income per share—basic and diluted

                   
 

Net income per share

  $ 39,762   $ 37,978   $ 32,844  
               
 

Weighted-average shares outstanding

    1     1     1  
               

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-27


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007

(dollars in thousands)

 
  Additional
Paid-In
Capital
  Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Total  

Balance at December 31, 2004

  $ 133,150   $ 55,358   $ (2,410 ) $ 186,098  
 

Other comprehensive income

                         
   

Net income

        39,762         39,762  
   

Other, net of tax

            (44 )   (44 )
                         
 

Total comprehensive income

                      39,718  
   

Stock compensation, net of tax

    700             700  
   

Dividend to Parent

        (8,192 )       (8,192 )
   

Expenses incurred by Parent

    4,897             4,897  
                   

Balance at December 31, 2005

    138,747     86,928     (2,454 )   223,221  
 

Other comprehensive income

                         
   

Net income

        37,978         37,978  
   

Other, net of tax

            603     603  
                         
 

Total comprehensive income

                      38,581  
   

Stock compensation, net of tax

    1,275             1,275  
   

Effect of adoption of EITF 04-6, net of tax benefit of $17,651

        (31,380 )       (31,380 )
   

Dividend to Parent

        (941 )       (941 )
   

Expenses incurred by Parent

    2,783             2,783  
   

Contribution from partners

    600             600  
                   

Balance at December 31, 2006

    143,405     92,585     (1,851 )   234,139  
 

Other comprehensive income

                         
   

Net income

        32,844         32,844  
   

Other, net of tax

            113     113  
                         
 

Total comprehensive income

                      32,957  
   

Stock compensation, net of tax

    1,796             1,796  
   

Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007

        (280 )       (280 )
   

Dividend to Parent

        (2,466 )       (2,466 )
   

Expenses incurred by Parent

    20,600             20,600  
   

Contribution from partners

    853             853  
                   

Balance at December 31, 2007

  $ 166,654   $ 122,683   $ (1,738 ) $ 287,599  
                   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-28


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007

(dollars in thousands)

 
  2005   2006   2007  

Cash flows from operating activities

                   
 

Net income

  $ 39,762   $ 37,978   $ 32,844  
 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
    (Earnings) losses from unconsolidated affiliates

    (2,209 )   1,435     (2,462 )
     

Asset impairment charges

            18,297  
     

Depreciation and depletion

    91,849     122,254     139,167  
     

Amortization

    45,279     44,577     42,312  
     

Accretion

    11,485     14,334     15,665  
     

Decrease in deferred stripping costs

    505          
     

(Gain) loss on sale of assets and transfer of liabilities

    (151 )   (719 )   (364 )
     

Deferred income taxes

    3,777     (4,301 )   (9,345 )
     

Expenses incurred on the Company's behalf and paid by Parent

    4,897     2,783     20,600  
     

Stock option expense

    513     429     794  
     

Interest expense converted to principal

    23,764     33,651     33,816  
     

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

                   
       

Receivables

    (7,171 )   (19,041 )   (14,136 )
       

Inventories, net

    (23,235 )   (17,666 )   (11,831 )
       

Due to related parties

    47,936     61,962     56,372  
       

Other assets

    (1,350 )   5,053     861  
       

Accounts payable, royalties and production taxes

                   
         

and accrued expenses

    20,613     27,139     4,577  
       

Asset retirement obligations

    (3,318 )   (5,779 )   (6,280 )
               

Net cash provided by operating activities

    252,946     304,089     320,887  
               

Cash flows from investing activities

                   
 

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

    (122,451 )   (186,044 )   (170,508 )
 

Proceeds from sale of assets

    1,132     2,119     1,279  
 

Decrease in restricted cash

    244     70     3,778  
 

Payment on refundable deposit

        (2,220 )   (24,397 )
 

Receipt on refundable deposit

            2,220  
 

Capital contributions to equity investments

    (2,150 )   (1,988 )    
 

Distributions from equity investments

    5,100     3,150     1,281  
 

Change in cash advances to affiliate

    (36,511 )   (64,066 )   22,850  
 

Other

        (1,366 )    
               

Net cash used in investing activities

    (154,636 )   (250,345 )   (163,497 )
               

Cash flows from financing activities

                   
 

Borrowings on long-term debt and capital lease obligations

    288     55,157      
 

Repayments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations

    (81,790 )   (100,329 )   (151,742 )
 

Dividend to Parent

    (8,192 )   (941 )   (2,466 )
 

Other

        600     853  
               

Net cash used in financing activities

    (89,694 )   (45,513 )   (153,355 )
               

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

    8,616     8,231     4,035  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

    2,750     11,366     19,597  
               

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  $ 11,366   $ 19,597   $ 23,632  
               

Supplemental cash flow disclosures:

                   
 

Cash payments for:

                   
   

Interest

  $ 28,981   $ 29,736   $ 20,554  
   

Income taxes

    6,417     20,110     2,437  

Supplemental noncash investing and financing activities:

                   
 

Long-term debt incurred for purchase of federal coal leases

  $ 102,699   $   $ 22,427  
 

Accounts payable incurred (paid) for purchase of property, plant and equipment

    13,974     (15,025 )   18,971  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-29


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in thousands)

1. Organization and Nature of Operations

        Effective May 11, 2006, Kennecott Energy and Coal Company, a Delaware corporation incorporated in March 1993, changed its name to Rio Tinto Energy America Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company" or "RTEA"). RTEA is the second largest producer of coal in the U.S. and in the Powder River Basin ("PRB") based on 2007 coal production. RTEA operates in the PRB, the lowest cost coal producing region in the U.S., and operates three of the five largest coal mines in the region and in the U.S. RTEA's operations include five wholly-owned surface coal mines, three of which are in Wyoming, one in Colorado and one in Montana, and RTEA owns a 50% interest in another surface coal mine in Montana. RTEA produces sub-bituminous steam coal with low sulfur content and sells its coal primarily to electric utilities. Steam coal is primarily consumed by electric utilities as fuel for electricity generation.

2. Basis of Presentation

        The accompanying consolidated financial statements include, on a carve-out basis, the accounts of RTEA and its subsidiaries that it has a controlling financial interest under the voting control model, as required by Accounting Research Bulletin ("ARB") No. 51 Consolidated Financial Statements (and its related interpretations) and Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") No. 04-5 Determining Whether A General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights or the risks and rewards model as required by the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Interpretation ("FIN") No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (revised December 2003)—an interpretation of ARB No. 51 ("FIN 46R"). The Company accounts for its pro-rata share of assets and liabilities in its undivided interest in a joint venture with Decker Coal Company ("Decker") using the proportionate consolidation method pursuant to Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-1, Investor Balance Sheet and Income Statement Display under the Equity Method for Investments in Certain Partnerships and Other Ventures, ("EITF 00-1") whereby its share of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses are included in the appropriate classification in the consolidated financial statements. Investments in unconsolidated companies in which RTEA does not have control and does not account for in accordance with EITF 00-1, but has the ability to exercise significant influence over the investee's operating and financial policies, are accounted for under the equity method. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. All intercompany balances and transactions which have occurred within the entities comprising the Company have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.

Variable Interest Entities

        The Company has interests in two variable interest entities ("VIE") for which it is the primary beneficiary. A VIE is a legal structure whose equity investors do not have all the characteristics of a controlling financial interest in the entity. The Company is required to consolidate such entities if the Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The Company adopted FIN 46R effective January 1, 2004. As part of its adoption of FIN 46R, the Company determined that Colowyo Coal Company ("Colowyo") was a VIE and that the Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Kennecott Colorado Coal Company ("Kennecott Colorado") was the primary beneficiary. Kennecott Colorado owns a 20% general partner interest in Colowyo. As a result, Colowyo was consolidated as of January 1, 2004. Prior to January 1, 2004, Colowyo was accounted for under the equity method. Colowyo is a producer of low

F-30


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

2. Basis of Presentation (Continued)


sulfur, steam coal from a surface coal mine in Colorado. As of December 31, 2007, the Company's carrying value of Colowyo's total assets was $71,174 and total liabilities was $227,336, including $139,956 in non-recourse bonds (the "Bonds").

        Rio Tinto Energy America Services Company ("RTEASC") is a wholly-owned subsidiary of RTEA's domestic parent company, Rio Tinto America Inc. ("RTA"), through Kennecott Management Services Company. RTEASC was formed on RTEA's behalf and employs certain RTEA employees and provides management services to RTEA, and RTEASC does not provide any services to other RTA business units. RTEA has no legal ownership interest in RTEASC. The Company completed its evaluation and determined that RTEASC qualified as a variable interest entity under the provisions of FIN 46R, and that the Company was the primary beneficiary. As a result, RTEASC was consolidated as of January 1, 2004. As of December 31, 2007, RTEASC had total assets of $1,859 and total liabilities of $11,268.

Allocated Expenses

        The accompanying carve-out consolidated financial statements reflect the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, changes in shareholder's equity and cash flows that were directly applicable to the Company. These consolidated financial statements also include corporate allocations of general and administrative costs. RTA has historically provided various services and other general corporate support to the Company, including, tax, treasury, corporate secretary, procurement, information systems and technology, human resources, accounting services and insurance/risk management in the ordinary course of business under preexisting contractual arrangements. The Company was charged for services provided under the preexisting contractual arrangements on a unit cost or cost allocation basis, such as per invoice processed, proportion of information technology users, share of time, calculated on a combination of factors, including percentage of operating expenditures, head count and revenue.

        In addition, the Company was allocated Rio Tinto headquarters overhead costs, including technology and innovation, board, community and external relations, investor relations, human resources and the Energy Product Group. The allocations were based on a percentage of operating expenses or revenue.

        Management believes that the allocation methodologies, as described above, were reasonable, however, the expenses allocated to the Company for these items are not necessarily indicative of the expenses that would have been incurred if the Company had been a separate independent entity.

        Included within selling, general and administrative costs in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007, are the Company's share of RTA's general and administrative costs and Rio Tinto headquarters overhead costs of $15,972, $18,345 and $23,643, respectively. Of these amounts, $4,897, $1,559, and $13,196 have been presented as a capital contribution within shareholder's equity as the amounts were incurred by Rio Tinto plc and its subsidiaries (the "Parent") and will not be paid by the Company.

F-31


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates in these consolidated financial statements include reserves for inventory obsolescence, share-based compensation expense, estimates for useful lives associated with long-lived assets, cash flow assumptions used in testing long-lived assets and goodwill for impairment, reclamation costs and income taxes and tax valuation allowances. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

        All highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

        Restricted cash consists of cash which is restricted for use in payment of the current portion of bond debt at December 31, 2006 and 2007 and money market funds which were restricted for use in payment of workers' compensation and occupational disease (e.g. black lung) at December 31, 2006. The Company was released from regulatory requirements to maintain the restricted cash for use in payment of workers' compensation and occupational disease during 2007.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable

        An allowance for doubtful accounts is calculated based on the aging of RTEA's accounts receivable, historical experience, and management judgment. RTEA writes-off accounts receivable against the allowance when RTEA determines a balance is uncollectible and no longer actively pursues collection of the receivable.

Inventories, net

Materials and Supplies

        Materials and supplies are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Obsolescence reserves are established for excess or obsolete materials and supplies inventory based on estimates made by Company personnel and management using prior experience and estimates of future usage.

Stockpiles and Finished Product ("Coal Inventory")

        Coal inventory is stated at the lower of average cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value represents the estimated future sales price based on spot coal prices and prices under long-term contracts; less the estimated costs to complete production and bring the product to sale. Raw coal represents coal stockpiles that may be sold in current condition or may be further processed prior to shipment to a customer. Coal inventory includes mining costs and advance stripping costs incurred up

F-32


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


to the point of stockpiling the coal and includes labor, supplies, equipment, applicable operating overhead and depreciation, depletion and amortization related to mining operations.

        In March 2005, the FASB issued EITF Issue No. 04-6, Accounting for Stripping Costs Incurred during Production in the Mining Industry ("EITF 04-6"). Prior to the adoption of EITF 04-6, the Company classified advance stripping costs associated with the removal of overburden above an unmined coal seam during the surface mining process as coal inventory. As a result of the adoption of EITF 04-6 on January 1, 2006, advance stripping costs incurred during the production phase of a mine are considered variable production costs and are included in the cost of inventory extracted during the period the stripping costs are incurred. The cumulative effect of adopting EITF 04-6 on January 1, 2006 was a reduction of $42,615 and $6,416 of inventory and deferred development costs, respectively, with a corresponding decrease to retained earnings, net of tax, of $31,380.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Plant and Equipment

        Plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of plant and equipment (excluding life of mine assets) is computed using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:

Buildings and improvements

  5 to 25 years

Machinery and equipment

  3 to 20 years

Furniture and fixtures

  3 years

        In addition, certain plant and equipment assets associated with mining are depreciated using the units-of-production method over the estimated recoverable reserves (based on proven and probable reserves which exclude non-recoverable reserves and anticipated processing losses).

Capitalization of Interest

        The Company's policy is to capitalize interest costs to property, plant and equipment on accumulated expenditures incurred as a result of preparing capital projects for their intended use.

Mine Development Costs

        Costs of developing new mines are capitalized where proven and probable reserves exist. Mine development costs are amortized using the units-of-production method over the estimated recoverable reserves (based on proven and probable reserves which exclude non-recoverable reserves and anticipated processing losses) that are associated with the property being benefited. Costs may include construction permits and licenses; mine design; construction of access roads, slopes and main entries; and removing overburden to access reserves in a new pit. The costs of removing overburden and waste materials to access the coal ore body prior to the production phase are capitalized during the development of the mine. Where multiple pits exist at a mining operation, overburden removal costs will be capitalized if such costs are for the development of a new area separate and distinct from the existing production phase mines. Such costs are capitalized until the point at which the production phase from each pit commences. Overburden removal costs incurred that relate to the enlargement of an existing pit are expensed. The production phase of a mine commences when saleable coal, beyond a

F-33


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


de minimus amount, is produced. Overburden removal costs incurred during the production phase are included as a cost of inventory to be recognized in cost of product sold in the same period as the revenue from the sale of inventory. Additionally, deferred mine development includes the costs associated with asset retirement obligations. Mine development costs are included in land, improvements and mineral rights in property, plant and equipment, net on the December 31, 2006 and 2007 consolidated balance sheets.

Coal Reserves and Mineral Rights

        Coal reserves are recorded at cost. Depletion of coal reserves and amortization of advance royalties is computed using the units-of-production method based on proven and probable reserves which exclude non-recoverable reserves and anticipated processing losses. Coal reserves and mineral rights are included in land, improvements and mineral rights in property, plant and equipment, net on the December 31, 2006 and 2007 consolidated balance sheets.

Repairs and Maintenance

        Major renewals and improvements are capitalized. During the ordinary course of business, the Company incurs costs associated with planned major maintenance activities. Expenditures to replace or completely rebuild major components of major equipment, which are required at predictable intervals to maintain asset life or performance, are capitalized. These major components are capitalized separately from the major equipment and depreciated according to their own expected estimated useful life rather than the estimated useful life of the major equipment. Costs of repairs and maintenance of major components associated with planned major maintenance activities are charged to expense as incurred.

Exploration Costs

        Exploration costs are expensed as incurred and include the cost of maps, aerial photographs and surveying, core drilling, depreciation, repair and maintenance of equipment used in exploration, core analysis and testing, fuel and supplies, purchased services directly attributable to exploration, damages and exploration permits. Wages and salaries, employee benefits, payroll taxes, workers' compensation and travel expenses of personnel assigned directly to exploration activities are also included in exploration costs.

        At existing development and production stage projects, drilling and related costs incurred to convert resources to reserves and identify new resources are expensed as incurred and included in exploration costs.

Impairment

        The Company periodically evaluates the recoverability of its long-lived assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("FAS") No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets ("FAS 144"). The Company reviews its assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the net book value of property, plant, equipment and mine development may not be recovered over its remaining service life. Provisions for asset impairment are charged to income when the sum of estimated future cash flows, on an undiscounted basis, is less than

F-34


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


the asset's net book value. Impairment charges are recorded using discounted cash flows which requires the use of estimates, and such estimates can change based on market conditions, technological advances in the industry or changes in regulations governing the industry.

Asset Retirement Obligations and Remediation Liabilities

        The Company accounts for its asset retirement obligations ("ARO") in accordance with SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations ("FAS 143"). FAS 143 requires legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets to be recognized at fair value at the time the obligations are incurred. The Company's ARO consists of costs associated with mine reclamation and closure activities, including earthwork, revegetation and demolition. ARO liabilities for final reclamation and mine closure are estimated based upon detailed engineering calculations of the amount and timing of the future cash spending for a third party to perform the required work. Spending estimates are escalated for inflation and then discounted at the credit-adjusted, risk-free rate. RTEA records an ARO asset associated with the discounted liability for final reclamation and mine closure. The obligation and corresponding asset are recognized in the period in which the liability is incurred. Upon initial recognition of a liability, the costs are capitalized as part of the related mining property and are included in depreciation and depletion expense in the consolidated statements of operations based on units of production over proven and probable reserves. As changes in estimates occur (such as mine plan revisions, changes in estimated costs or changes in timing of the performance of reclamation activities), the revisions to the obligation and asset are recognized at the credit-adjusted, risk-free rate. Costs related to environmental remediation are charged to expense as incurred.

Intangible Assets

        Intangible assets consist of the fair value assigned to favorable long-term coal supply contracts obtained through Company acquisitions in 1993 and 1998. The Company has three long-term coal supply contracts acquired during this period, two of which were acquired in 1993 and one which was acquired in 1998. The long-term supply contracts acquired in 1993 expire in 2010 and 2012. The long-term supply contract acquired in 1998 expires in 2011. These long-term coal supply contracts are amortized based on contract deliveries over terms ranging from 14 to 19 years. The remaining weighted-average amortization period for these long-term supply contracts as of December 31, 2007 is four years. Intangible assets are also subject to evaluation for potential impairment if an event occurs or a change in circumstances indicates the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

Goodwill

        As required by SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets ("FAS 142") the Company assesses the carrying value of goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter, or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The Company assesses goodwill for possible impairment using a two-step method in which the carrying value of each reporting unit is compared to its fair value. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the Company performs an analysis to determine the fair values of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit to determine whether the implied goodwill of that reporting unit has been impaired. The Company determines the fair value of its reporting units utilizing estimated future discounted cash flows based on estimates of

F-35


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


proven and probable reserves, coal prices and operating costs consistent with assumptions that it believes marketplace participants would use in their estimates of fair value. At both December 31, 2006 and 2007, the balance of goodwill included in other assets is $35,634.

Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits

        The Company's employees participate in a defined benefit retirement plan (the "Plan") sponsored by RTA and accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 87, Employers' Accounting for Pensions ("FAS 87"). Annual contributions to the Plan are made as determined by consulting actuaries based upon the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) minimum funding standard and are allocated to the Company by RTA. Periodic costs pertaining to the RTA plans are allocated to the Company on a basis of projected benefit obligation with respect to financing costs and on the basis of actuarial determinations for current and prior service costs. A liability is only recognized for any contributions due and unpaid. Plan benefit obligations and plan assets for the Company have not been recorded on the consolidated financial statements in accordance with the FAS 87 Implementation Guide, which addresses separate financial statements of a subsidiary that participates in a parent's pension plan.

        The Company's employees participate in a defined benefit postretirement welfare plan (the "Welfare Plan") sponsored by RTA and accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 106, Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions ("FAS 106"). Postretirement medical, dental and life insurance benefits are provided to employees and their beneficiaries and dependents that meet eligibility requirements. Net postretirement cost for the Company is the required contribution to the Welfare Plan based on actuarial cost data and an allocation from RTA. The Welfare Plan contains certain cost sharing features such as deductibles and coinsurance. The Company and RTA can amend or terminate the Welfare Plan at any time.

Accrued Liabilities and Other Reserves

Litigation

        The Company estimates its reserves related to litigation based on the facts and circumstances specific to the litigation and its past experience with similar claims. The Company estimates the range of its liability related to pending litigation when it believes the amount and range of loss can be estimated. The Company records its best estimate of a loss when the loss is considered probable and estimable. When a liability is probable and there is a range of estimated loss with no best estimate in the range, the Company records the minimum estimated liability related to the lawsuits or claims. As additional information becomes available, the Company assesses the potential liability related to its pending litigation and claims and revises its estimates.

Workers' Compensation

        For Company employees of Wyoming, workers' compensation insurance is provided through a state fund program. The Company contributes to the state fund program through its payroll function by applying the assessed state rate to gross payroll. The rate the Company pays is assessed by the state and is adjusted prospectively based on the Company's workers' compensation historical incident rating.

F-36


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        For Company employees of Colorado and Montana, workers' compensation insurance is provided under a self-insured worker's compensation program. The Company maintains actuarially-determined accruals on its consolidated balance sheets to cover self-insurance retentions for workers' compensation. These accruals are based on certain assumptions developed utilizing historical data to project future losses. Loss estimates in the calculation of these accruals are adjusted based upon actual claim settlements and reported claims. These loss estimates and accruals recorded in the Company's consolidated financial statements for claims have historically been reasonable in comparison to the actual amount of claims paid. The Company's insurance coverage generally provides that it assume a portion of the risk in the form of a deductible. Accruals for workers' compensation costs are included in other noncurrent liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

Share-Based Compensation

        Effective January 1, 2006, RTEA adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment ("FAS 123R"). For equity awards, FAS 123R requires companies to measure the cost of employee stock options based on the grant-date fair value and recognize that cost over the period during which a recipient is required to provide services in exchange for the share-based payment, typically the vesting period. For cash settled awards, FAS 123R requires companies to measure the cost of employee stock options based on the fair value as of the date of the balance sheet and recognize that cost over the period during which a recipient is required to provide services in exchange for the share-based payment, typically the vesting period. RTEA adopted the provisions of FAS 123R using the modified-retrospective transition method. The fair value of certain share-based payment awards are estimated at the date of grant using a lattice-based option valuation model. For other market based awards, the fair value is assumed to be 50% of the grant date share price to adjust for the likelihood of meeting the market condition. For cash settled awards, the fair values are subsequently remeasured at the balance sheet date to reflect the number of awards expected to vest based on the current and anticipated total shareholder return performance. All stock awards pertaining to RTEA are granted by the Parent under the Parent award plans.

        Because employee share-based awards have characteristics significantly different from those of traded stock and options, and because changes in the input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, the existing models may not provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of the employee stock options or other stock awards. Management will continue to assess the assumptions and methodologies used to calculate estimated fair value of share-based compensation. Circumstances may change and additional data may become available over time, which could result in changes to these assumptions and methodologies and thereby materially impact the fair value determination. If factors change and the Company employs different assumptions in the application of FAS 123R in future periods, the compensation expense that was recorded under FAS 123R may differ significantly from what was recorded in the current period.

        The Company has elected to adopt FASB Staff Position No. FAS 123(R)-3, Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards, to calculate the Company's pool of windfall tax benefits.

        Additionally, under FAS 123R, beginning January 1, 2006, excess income tax benefits from the exercise of share-based compensation awards are recognized in cash flows from financing activities in

F-37


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


the consolidated statements of cash flows. The Company's excess income tax benefits recorded for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 were not material.

Income Taxes

        RTEA accounts for income taxes pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences arising from differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities existing at each balance sheet date using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when the related taxes are expected to be paid or recovered. A valuation allowance is established if it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized. In determining the appropriate valuation allowance, the Company considers projected realization of tax benefits based on expected levels of future taxable income, available tax planning strategies and its overall deferred tax position. RTEA has no foreign subsidiaries.

        RTEA's income tax calculations are based on application of the respective United States Federal or state tax law. The Company's tax filings, however, are subject to audit by the respective tax authorities. Accordingly, the Company recognizes tax liabilities based upon its estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due when such estimates are probable and reasonably estimable. To the extent the final tax liabilities are different than the amounts originally accrued, the increases or decreases are recorded as income tax expense or benefit in the consolidated statements of operations.

        Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FIN No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes ("FIN 48"). In connection with the adoption of FIN 48, the Company recognized increases to its tax reserves for uncertain tax positions and interest and penalties which was accounted for as an increase to other long-term liabilities and as a reduction to retained earnings at January 1, 2007.

        The Company is a member of a consolidated federal tax group and is party to a federal tax sharing agreement with the other members of the consolidated federal tax group. However, for the purposes of the accompanying consolidated financial statements, which are prepared on a carve-out basis, the Company's current and deferred tax benefit (provision) was calculated on a stand alone income tax return basis.

Revenue Recognition

        Revenue is recognized from a sale when pervasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is determinable, the product has been delivered, the title has transferred to the customer and collection of the sales price is reasonably assured.

        Coal sales revenues include sales to customers of coal produced at Company operations and coal purchased from other companies. Coal sales are made to the Company's customers under the terms of coal supply agreements, most of which are long-term (greater than one year). Under the typical terms of these coal supply agreements, title and risk of loss transfer to the customer at the time the coal is shipped which is the point at which revenue is recognized. Certain contracts provide for title and risk of loss transfer at the point of destination in which case revenue is recognized at destination.

        Coal sales contracts typically contain coal quality specifications. With coal quality specifications in place, the raw coal sold by the Company to the customer at the delivery point must be substantially

F-38


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


free of magnetic material and other foreign material impurities, and crushed to a maximum size as set forth in the respective coal sales contract. Prior to billing the customer, quality price adjustments are made relative to an average quality that is specified in a coal sales contract, such as British thermal unit factor, moisture, ash and sodium content, and can result in either increases or decreases in the value of the coal shipped.

        Transportation costs are included in cost of coal sales and amounts billed by the Company to its customers for transportation are included at gross amounts in coal sales.

Segment Information

        The Company reviews, manages and operates its business as a single operating segment, coal production. The Company produces low sulfur, steam coal from surface mines, located in the Northwest region of the United States within the Powder River and Uinta Basins, which it sells to electric utilities and industrial customers. In accordance with SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information ("FAS 131"), the Company has determined it has one reportable segment primarily based on its chief operating decision maker assessing the Company's performance and allocating resources based on the Company's consolidated financial information.

Net Income Per Share

        RTEA accounts for net income per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share ("FAS 128"). Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common and potential dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Potential dilutive common shares consist of incremental common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options. Because stock options issued to RTEA employees are options on the Parent's stock, RTEA has no potential dilutive common shares as of December 31, 2007.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements ("FAS 157") which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 clarifies how to measure fair value as permitted under other accounting pronouncements but does not require any new fair value measurements. FAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. On February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 157-2 ("FSP 157-2"), which delayed the effective date of FAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis or at least once a year, to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The provisions of FSP 157-2 are effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009. The Company adopted the provisions of FAS 157 on January 1, 2008, except for those items deferred under FSP 157-2. The adoption of FAS 157 did not have a material effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

F-39


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 ("FAS 159"). FAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. FAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. FAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company did not elect the fair value option under FAS 159 for any of its financial assets or liabilities that are not already required to be presented at fair value under generally accepted accounting principles and therefore the adoption of FAS 159 had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations ("FAS 141R") and SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51 ("FAS 160"). FAS 141R and FAS 160 will significantly change the accounting for and reporting of business combination transactions and noncontrolling (minority) interests in consolidated financial statements. FAS 141R retains the fundamental requirements in FAS No. 141, Business Combinations while providing additional definitions, such as the definition of the acquirer in a purchase and improvements in the application of how the acquisition method is applied. FAS 160 will change the accounting and reporting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests, and classified as a component of equity. Both pronouncements become simultaneously effective January 1, 2009. Early adoption is not permitted. FAS 160 shall be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which it is initially applied, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements. The presentation and disclosure requirements shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that these pronouncements may have on its consolidated financial statements.

        In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 ("FAS 161"). This statement amends SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities ("FAS 133") to require enhanced disclosures about an entity's derivative and hedging activities, including disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FAS 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. FAS 161 encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this pronouncement may have on its consolidated financial statements.

        In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position ("FSP") No. FAS 142-3 Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets, which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and early adoption is prohibited. The guidance for determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset will be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective

F-40


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


date. The disclosure requirements will be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of, and subsequent to, the effective date. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this FSP may have on its consolidated financial statements.

        In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("FAS 162"). This statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("US GAAP"). FAS 162 applies to financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with US GAAP and shall be effective sixty days following the Securities and Exchange Commission's approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this pronouncement may have on its consolidated financial statements.

4. Inventories, net

        Inventories, net consisted of the following at December 31:

 
  2006   2007  

Materials and supplies, net

  $ 61,283   $ 73,308  

Coal stockpile and finished product

    2,909     2,715  
           

  $ 64,192   $ 76,023  
           

        Materials and supplies are stated net of an obsolescence allowance of $1,326 and $2,040 as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. The Company increased the provision for obsolescence by $184, $277 and $915 and utilized $63, $61, and $201, respectively, during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

5. Property, Plant and Equipment

        Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following at December 31:

 
  2006   2007  

Land, improvements and mineral rights

  $ 983,189   $ 1,162,159  

Mining equipment

    821,886     854,635  

Construction in progress

    172,238     138,513  

Other equipment

    125,179     125,357  

Buildings and improvements

    85,535     86,843  
           

    2,188,027     2,367,507  

Less: accumulated depreciation and depletion

    (892,639 )   (1,023,261 )
           

  $ 1,295,388   $ 1,344,246  
           

F-41


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

5. Property, Plant and Equipment (Continued)

        As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, the net book value of coal reserves, included in land, improvements and mineral rights above, totaled $603,108 and $591,886, respectively. These amounts included mineral rights of $146,066 and $35,481 at December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively, attributable to properties where the Company was not currently engaged in mining operations or leasing to third parties and, therefore, the coal reserves are not currently being depleted.

        Depreciation and depletion expense on property, plant and equipment for the years ended December 31 2005, 2006 and 2007, was $91,849, $122,254 and $139,167, respectively. Interest costs capitalized during the construction period were $5,841, $4,091 and $3,629 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

        During the year ended December 31, 2007, upon the announcement that the Company's Parent was exploring options to sell the Company, the Company abandoned its involvement in its Parent's aligning business systems project, which included implementation of an information technology software and hardware system, and recorded an impairment charge of $18,297 which is included in asset impairment charges in the consolidated statements of operations.

6. Intangible Assets

        Intangible assets consisted of the following at December 31:

 
  2006   2007  

Acquired long-term coal supply contracts

  $ 554,195   $ 491,843  

Less: accumulated amortization

    (416,950 )   (396,910 )
           

  $ 137,245   $ 94,933  
           

        Of the Company's long-term coal supply contracts, two were acquired in 1993 and one was acquired in 1998. The long-term supply contracts acquired in 1993 expire in 2010 and 2012. The long-term supply contract acquired in 1998 expires in 2011.

        Aggregate amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 was $45,279, $44,577 and $42,312, respectively.

        Amortization expense is estimated to be $50,334 in 2008, $35,713 in 2009, $6,580 in 2010, $1,153 in 2011 and $1,153 in 2012.

7. Investments

        During the three years ended December 31, 2007, the Company had a 50% interest in both Venture Fuels and Venture Energy, LLC, a 33% interest in Gateway Terminal, LLC and a 26.5% interest in NeuCo Inc.

F-42


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

7. Investments (Continued)

        Investments are included in other noncurrent assets on the December 31, 2006 and 2007 consolidated balance sheets. The following is condensed financial information for these equity method investments as of and for the years ended December 31:

 
  2005   2006   2007  

Revenues

  $ 62,573   $ 66,503   $ 66,105  

Net income

    6,958     4,815     6,363  

Total Current Assets

          18,963     22,289  

Total Noncurrent Assets

          7,844     7,880  

Total Current Liabilities

          11,927     12,689  

Total Noncurrent Liabilities

          946     746  

        The Company's share of earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax was $2,209, $(1,435) and $2,462 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, which includes an impairment charge for an other than temporary decline in the value of the Company's investment in NeuCo Inc. of $3,226, net of tax for the year ended December 31, 2006. There were no capital contributions made to equity investees for the year ended December 31, 2007. The Company made capital contributions to equity investees of $1,988 for the year ended December 31, 2006 and received distributions from equity investees of $3,150 and $1,281 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

8. Long-Term Debt

        Long-term debt consisted of the following at December 31:

 
  2006   2007  

RTA facility—related party

  $ 583,181   $ 500,627  
           

Bonds

 
$

146,523
 
$

139,956
 

Less: current portion of long-term debt—bonds

    (6,567 )   (7,918 )
           

Long-term debt—bonds

  $ 139,956   $ 132,038  
           

Federal coal leases

 
$

79,028
 
$

76,496
 

Other

    3,526     3,310  
           
 

Total

    82,554     79,806  

Less: current portion of long-term debt—other

    (28,452 )   (34,689 )
           

Long-term debt—other

  $ 54,102   $ 45,117  
           

RTA Facility

        The RTA facility (the "Facility") allows the Company to borrow up to $800,000 from RTA with no specified maturity date. The Company has classified the amounts due as long-term in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2007 because RTA agreed that the amounts would not be due prior to January 1, 2009, and would not be demanded without twelve months notice, unless there

F-43


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

8. Long-Term Debt (Continued)


was a change in control of the Company. Accordingly, the Company has presented the amount as repayable in 2009 in the future maturities table below. The amounts bear interest, payable quarterly, calculated on the daily average borrowings outstanding during the quarter at a rate equal to the average 3 month U.S. dollar LIBOR plus a margin of 1.5%, and was 6.9% and 6.5% at December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, $35,376 and $37,446, respectively, of accrued interest on the Facility were converted to principal. The approximate fair value of the Facility was $503,725 at December 31, 2007, estimated based upon the present value of the estimated future cash flows of repayment utilizing the interest rate noted above.

Federal Coal Leases

        On March 1, 2005, the United States Department of the Interior: Bureau of Land Management ("BLM") in the state of Wyoming ("WBLM") issued a federal coal lease ("Federal Lease 1") to the Company for mining purposes. The terms of Federal Lease 1 require the Company to remit to the WBLM $146,311 over a five-year period in equal annual installments of $29,262 commencing March 1, 2005 through March 1, 2009. There is no stated interest; however, within the accompanying consolidated financial statements, interest expense has been imputed on Federal Lease 1 at an annual rate of 5.5%. The Company recorded interest expense of $2,152 and $3,171, net of interest amounts capitalized, for Federal Lease 1 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. Imputed interest of $4,660 for Federal Lease 1 for the year ended December 31, 2005 was capitalized. The accompanying consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2006 and 2007, include only the principal amounts of $79,028 and $54,069, respectively, under Federal Lease 1.

        On December 1, 2007, the BLM in the state of Montana ("MBLM") issued a federal coal lease ("Federal Lease 2") to the Company for mining purposes. The terms of Federal Lease 2 require the Company to remit to the MBLM $19,902 over a five-year period in equal annual installments of $3,980 commencing December 1, 2007 through December 1, 2011. There is no stated interest; however, within the accompanying consolidated financial statements, interest expense has been imputed on Federal Lease 2 at an annual rate of 6.6%. The Company recorded interest expense of $525, net of capitalized interest of zero, for Federal Lease 2 for the year ended December 31, 2007. The accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2007, includes only the principal amount of $13,602 under Federal Lease 2.

        On July 1, 2007, the BLM issued a federal coal lease ("Federal Lease 3") to the Company for mining purposes. The terms of Federal Lease 3 require the Company to remit to the BLM $13,107 over a five-year period in equal annual installments of $2,621 commencing July 1, 2007 through July 1, 2011. There is no stated interest; however, within the accompanying consolidated financial statements, interest expense has been imputed on Federal Lease 3 at an annual rate of 7.3%. The Company recorded interest expense of $214, net of capitalized interest of zero, for Federal Lease 3 for the year ended December 31, 2007. The accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2007, includes only the principal amount of $8,825 under Federal Lease 3. The rate utilized to impute interest on the respective federal coal lease purchase note payable was a credit adjusted risk-free rate based upon the term of the note and the Company's estimated credit rating. The approximate fair value of the total federal coal leases was $79,291 at December 31, 2007. The fair value of the total federal coal leases for disclosure purposes was estimated based upon the present value of the estimated

F-44


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

8. Long-Term Debt (Continued)


cash flows at credit adjusted risk-free rates based upon the terms of the notes and the Company's estimated credit rating.

Bonds

        The Bonds were issued by Colowyo in 1994 in two simultaneous tranches. The first tranche for $92,800 bears interest at 9.56% and matures in November 2011. The second tranche for $100,000 bears interest at 10.19% and matures in November 2016. The Bonds are collateralized by the revenues from certain contracts (contract revenues) for the sale of coal from the Colowyo mine. The Bonds are administered under a Trust Indenture (the Indenture) and a Depositary Agreement with the Bank of New York Mellon acting as the Trustee and Depositary Agent, respectively. Under these agreements, Colowyo must make certain transfer payments to the manager of the mine as consideration for managing the mine. All contract revenues are received by the Depositary Agent, and the Company is obligated to direct the Depositary Agent to disburse the funds relating to the transfer payment and the payment of principal and interest to the bondholders in accordance with the priorities set forth in the Indenture. The Indenture requires a debt service reserve to be maintained by the Trustee (reflected as restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheets). Contract revenues receivable, which are collected by the Trustee, are classified as restricted accounts receivables on the consolidated balance sheets. The minority interest partners in Colowyo are obligated to pay any remaining unpaid principal and interest in excess of contract revenues and the debt service reserve up to a maximum of $25,000. This obligation is guaranteed by a letter of credit put in place by the limited partners in Colowyo and was $20,842 at December 31, 2007. These and other agreements related to the Bonds contain certain restrictive covenants and require Colowyo to use excess contract revenues to the extent available to maintain a debt service coverage ratio with respect to the contract revenues. The approximate fair value of the Bonds was $165,671 at December 31, 2007. The fair value of the Bonds for disclosure purposes was estimated based upon the present value of the estimated cash flows utilizing the interest rates noted above.

Other

        On June 30, 1998, the Company purchased 1,891.81 acres of land for $2,310 from a private landowner for mining purposes and entered into a loan agreement with the private landowner for the purchase price. The loan agreement bears interest at 8% until the private landowner demands payment from the Company. The demand for payment by the private landowner may be made at any time from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2013, dependent on certain milestones under the loan agreement, and as a result, the amounts outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2007 are included in current portion of long-term debt on the consolidated balance sheets.

F-45


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

8. Long-Term Debt (Continued)

        Future maturities of long-term debt as of December 31, 2007 are as follows:

2008

  $ 42,607  

2009

    543,216  

2010

    16,898  

2011

    19,168  

2012

    15,123  

Thereafter

    83,377  
       

  $ 720,389  
       

        Interest expense under financing arrangements totaled $49,570, $56,568 and $54,262 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

9. Asset Retirement Obligations

        Changes in the carrying amount of the Company's asset retirement obligations are as follows as of December 31:

 
  2006   2007  

Balance at January 1

  $ 191,437   $ 228,958  
 

Accretion expense

    14,334     15,665  
 

Revisions to estimated cash flows

    28,966     (13,405 )
 

Payments

    (5,779 )   (6,280 )
           

Balance at December 31

  $ 228,958   $ 224,938  
           

        The revisions to estimated cash flows pertain to revisions in the timing of cash flows throughout the lives of the respective mines and are due to changes in estimates of closure volumes, disturbed acreages and estimated third party unit costs as of December 31, 2006 and 2007.

10. Employee Benefit Plans

Pension Plan

        The Company's employees participate in a defined benefit retirement plan sponsored by RTA, accounted for in accordance with FAS 87. Annual contributions to the Plan are made as determined by consulting actuaries based upon the ERISA minimum funding standard and are allocated to the Company by RTA. Assets and liabilities related to the Plan are not reflected in the Company's consolidated financial statements. The Company recorded expense and a corresponding increase in due to related parties of $5,350, $6,464, and $6,680 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (payable to the plan sponsor), respectively, as a result of its participation in the plan, reflecting the Company's proportional share of the RTA expense based on the number of plan participants.

F-46


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

10. Employee Benefit Plans (Continued)

Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions

        The Company's employees participate in a defined benefit postretirement welfare plan sponsored by RTA, accounted for in accordance with SFAS 106. Postretirement medical, dental and life insurance benefits are provided to employees and their beneficiaries and dependents that meet eligibility requirements. Net postretirement cost for the Company is the required contribution to the Welfare Plan based on actuarial cost data and an allocation from RTA. The Welfare Plan contains certain cost sharing features such as deductibles and coinsurance. The Company and RTA can amend or terminate the Welfare Plan at any time. The Company recorded expense and a corresponding increase in due to related parties of $3,593, $2,721 and $2,823 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, under the Welfare Plan.

        The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the "Act") was signed into law on December 8, 2003. The Company has elected to not seek the subsidy provisions of the Act; instead it modified the prescription drug benefit provided to Medicare Eligible retirees to coordinate with the Medicare Part D benefit. This resulted in an actuarial gain due to the expected reduction in claim costs. This reduction in accumulated projected benefit obligation in turn reduces the net periodic postretirement benefit cost due to corresponding reductions in the service cost, interest cost and the amortization of the net accumulated gain.

Savings Plan and Investment Partnership Plans

        The Company is a participating employer in two defined contribution plans sponsored by RTA. The two plans are covered in The Summary Plan Description ("SPD") dated April 1, 2007. The SPD includes the Savings Plan ("401k Plan") document which became effective as of January 1, 2003, and is amended by the SPD, as well as provisions relating to the Investment Partnership Plan ("IPP"). The IPP was established in April 2007 for the benefit of qualified employees. For regulatory purposes the 401k Plan and IPP are considered one plan. The SPD is a summary of the official plan documents that set forth the terms, conditions and administrative operations of a benefit plan that is subject to ERISA. Employees are eligible to participate in the 401k Plan on date of hire if considered full-time and must enroll in the plan to receive the Company matching contributions. Employee salary contribution amounts are subject to federal income tax limitations, and the Company matches employee salary contributions up to six percent. The Company matching contributions for the 401k Plan were $4,417, $5,566 and $5,686 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. Employees are eligible to participate in the IPP on date of hire subsequent to March 31, 2007 if considered full-time. Full-time employees hired prior to April 1, 2007 must elect to participate in the IPP. Employees are 100% vested in their contributions and vest in Company contributions ratably over a three year period. Company contributions are 6% of eligible base pay below the social security wage base plus 11.7% of eligible base pay above the social security wage base. The Company contribution for the IPP Plan was $734 for the year ended December 31, 2007.

11. Income Taxes

        The Company's income before income tax provision and earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates is solely earned in the United States.

F-47


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

11. Income Taxes (Continued)

        The provision for income taxes consisted of the following for the years ended December 31:

 
  2005   2006   2007  

Current:

                   
 

Federal

  $ (5,804 ) $ (12,397 ) $ (10,648 )
 

State

    (185 )   (357 )   (263 )
               
 

Total current

    (5,989 )   (12,754 )   (10,911 )
               

Deferred:

                   
 

Federal

    (5,061 )   5,697     8,188  
 

State

    (144 )   163     234  
               
 

Total deferred

    (5,205 )   5,860     8,422  
               

Total income tax provision

  $ (11,194 ) $ (6,894 ) $ (2,489 )
               

        The tax effects of temporary differences that constitute the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities consisted of the following at December 31:

 
  2006   2007  

Deferred income tax assets:

             
 

Accrued expenses and liabilities

  $ 36,553   $ 41,896  
 

Goodwill and other intangibles

    8,353     6,944  
 

Accrued reclamation and mine closure costs

    57,873     56,590  
 

Alternative minimum tax credits

    29,114     30,208  
           

Total deferred income tax assets

    131,893     135,638  

Deferred income tax liabilities:

             
 

Inventories

    (6,468 )   (7,969 )
 

Property, plant, equipment and contract rights

    (190,983 )   (182,829 )
 

Investment in joint venture partnerships

    (25,667 )   (25,736 )
           

Total deferred income tax liabilities

    (223,118 )   (216,534 )
           

Net deferred income tax liabilities

  $ (91,225 ) $ (80,896 )
           

        Deferred income taxes are classified in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at December 31 as follows:

 
  2006   2007  

Current deferred income tax assets

  $ 29,943   $ 30,072  

Noncurrent deferred income tax liabilities

    (121,168 )   (110,968 )
           

Net deferred income tax liabilities

  $ (91,225 ) $ (80,896 )
           

        The Company evaluated and assessed the book and taxable income trends, available tax strategies and the overall deferred tax position and determined it was more likely than not that the deferred income tax assets would be recovered, therefore, a valuation allowance is not recorded at December 31,

F-48


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

11. Income Taxes (Continued)


2006 and 2007. At December 31, 2007, the Company has $30,208 of Alternative Minimum Tax credit carryforwards which are available indefinitely to offset future Federal regular income taxes payable.

        The Company's effective tax rate differs from the United States federal statutory income tax rate for the years ended December 31 as follows:

 
  2005   2006   2007  

United States federal statutory income tax rate

    35.0 %   35.0 %   35.0 %

State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit

    0.6     0.4     0.2  

Depletion

    (11.8 )   (12.6 )   (24.0 )

Partnership earnings of unconsolidated partners/recognition of outside basis difference

        (6.7 )    

Other

    (0.8 )   (1.2 )   (3.6 )
               

Effective tax rate

    23.0 %   14.9 %   7.6 %
               

        Percentage depletion is limited by a portion of net income and other rules. These limitations reduced the amount of the depletion deducted in 2005 and 2006 relative to the amount of depletion deducted in 2007 has resulted in a decrease in our effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006.

        Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes," ("FIN 48") an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 "Accounting for Income Taxes." In connection with the adoption of FIN 48, the Company recognized $1,608 of tax reserves for uncertain tax positions and $280 of interest. These increases were accounted for as an increase to other long-term liabilities, an increase to net deferred tax assets, and as a reduction to retained earnings at January 1, 2007. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had approximately $1,906 of total gross unrecognized tax benefits, and $307 of interest recorded as other long-term liabilities. The amount if recognized, would not have a material impact on the effective income tax rate in future periods. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

Total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits at January 1, 2007

  $ 1,608  

Additions for tax positions of previous years

    298  
       

Total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2007

  $ 1,906  
       

        The Company is subject to income taxes in the United States and certain state jurisdictions. United States federal income tax returns for 2000 through 2005 are currently under examination and the Company is no longer subject to examination for periods prior to 2000. The Company is also subject to income tax examinations by state taxing authorities, none of which is individually significant. The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the relevant adjustments that were agreed to as a result of prior examinations by taxing authorities. The reduction to unrecognized tax benefits that is reasonably possible to occur in the next 12 months is not significant.

        The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters in the income tax expense line item in the consolidated statements of operations.

F-49


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

11. Income Taxes (Continued)

        The Company is a member of a consolidated federal tax group and is party to a federal tax sharing agreement with the other members of the consolidated federal tax group. However, for the purposes of the accompanying consolidated financial statements, which are prepared on a carve-out basis, the Company's current and deferred tax benefit (provision) was calculated on a stand alone separate return basis.

12. Share-Based Compensation

        The compensation cost that has been recognized as selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations for RTEA's share-based compensation plans, and related liability (for cash settled plans), are presented in the following table:

 
  Expense for the years ended
December 31,
  Liability as of
December 31,
 
 
  2005   2006   2007   2006   2007  

Equity-settled plans

  $ 513   $ 429   $ 794   $   $  

Cash settled plans

    510     125     2,098     520     2,495  
                       

Total

  $ 1,023   $ 554   $ 2,892   $ 520   $ 2,495  
                       

Tax effects

    63     34     98     (37 )   (766 )
                       

        As of December 31, 2007, total share-based compensation related to remaining accumulated non-vested awards with a fair value of $3,200 will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.

Lattice-based option valuation model

        The fair value of share awards under the Share Option plan and Share Savings plan are estimated as at the date of grant using a lattice-based option valuation model. The significant assumptions used in the valuation model are disclosed below. Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Parent's share returns under the United Kingdom and Australian listings. The dividend yield is calculated at the date of grant based on the prospective dividend payable and share price at date of grant. The prospective dividend is estimated as two times the most recent half-yearly dividend. Historical data was used to estimate employee forfeiture and cancellation rates within the valuation model. Under the Share Option Plan, it is assumed that after options have vested, 20 percent per annum of participants will exercise their options when the market price is at least 20 percent above the exercise price of the option. Participants in the Share Savings Plan are assumed to exercise their options immediately after vesting. The expected term of options granted is derived from the output of the option valuation model and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate used in the valuation model is equal to the yield available on United Kingdom and Australian zero-coupon government bonds (for Parent and Rio Tinto Limited ("RTL") options, respectively) at the date of grant with a term equal to the expected term of the options.

F-50


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

12. Share-Based Compensation (Continued)

Share authorization information

        The rules of the Parent's share option plans contain various restrictions on the number of shares that may be authorized for awards of share options. In particular, the number of shares that may be allocated for share option awards when added to shares allocated in the previous 10 years may not exceed 10% of the Parent's ordinary share capital.

Summary of options outstanding

        A summary of the status of the Company's share-based award plans for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, is presented below:

Options outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2005
  Number   Weighted-
average
exercise
price per
option
  Weighted-
average
remaining
contractual
life—Years
  Aggregate
intrinsic
value
 

Rio Tinto Share Option Plan and Share Savings Plan

    233,904   $ 23.73     4.9   $ 5,220  

Rio Tinto Mining Companies Comparative Plan

    59,486         2.5     2,754  
                       

Total

    293,390               $ 7,974  
                       

Options outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2006

 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

Rio Tinto Share Option Plan and Share Savings Plan

    213,501   $ 32.30     4.2   $ 4,556  

Rio Tinto Mining Companies Comparative Plan and Phantom Share Option Plan

    61,039     2.49     2.4     3,189  
                       

Total

    274,540               $ 7,745  
                       

Options outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2007

 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

Rio Tinto Share Option Plan and Share Savings Plan

    178,961   $ 42.50     3.8   $ 11,448  

Rio Tinto Mining Companies Comparative Plan and Phantom Share Option Plan

    61,236     2.76     2.1     6,434  

Rio Tinto Management Share Plan

    14,750         2.0     1,599  
                       

Total

    254,947               $ 19,481  
                       

Options exercisable for the year ended December 31, 2006

 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

Rio Tinto Share Option Plan and Share Savings Plan

    72,609   $ 23.08     4.5   $ 2,200  
                       

Options exercisable for the year ended December 31, 2007

 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

Rio Tinto Share Option Plan and Share Savings Plan

    37,486   $ 23.97     3.8   $ 3,084  
                       

F-51


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

12. Share-Based Compensation (Continued)

        Weighted-average exercise price and aggregate intrinsic value converted to U.S. dollars using the balance sheet date foreign exchange rate.

Options exercised for the year ended December 31
  Number
2005
  Aggregate
instrinsic
value
2005
  Number
2006
  Aggregate
instrinsic
value
2006
 

Rio Tinto Share Option Plan and Share Savings Plan

    65,790   $ 634     62,220   $ 1,765  

Rio Tinto Mining Companies Comparative Plan and Phantom Share Option Plan

    2,225     12          
                   

Total

    68,015   $ 646     62,220   $ 1,765  
                   

 

Options exercised for the year ended December 31, 2007
  Number   Weighted-
average
exercise
price per
option
  Aggregate
intrinsic
value
 

Rio Tinto Share Option Plan and Share Savings Plan

    28,917   $ 24.06   $ 952  
               

        Aggregate intrinsic value converted to U.S. dollars using the average annual foreign exchange rate.

Options vested for the year ended December 31,
  Number
2005
  Total fair
value
2005
  Number
2006
  Total fair
value
2006
  Number
2007
  Total fair
value
2007
 

Rio Tinto Share Option Plan and Share Savings Plan

    97,101   $ 712     91,677   $ 539     20,958   $ 173  

Phantom Share Option Plan

    2,225     23                  
                           

Total

    99,326   $ 735     91,677   $ 539     20,958   $ 173  
                           

Share Savings Plan

        The Rio Tinto Share Savings Plan is open to all employees eligible to participate in the Parent's Share Savings Plan. Employees who participate save a fixed amount from pay to a savings account for a two year term. At the end of the savings term, the employees have a choice of using the money to buy shares in the Company, withdrawing the money, or a combination of both. The option to buy shares is based on a fixed exercise price which is equal to the market price of the Company's shares on the day of grant less a 15% discount. Employees may exercise the options within six months of the expiration date. The awards under these plans are settled in equity and accounted for accordingly. The shares may be satisfied by the issuance of new shares or the purchase of shares in the market. The fair value of each award on the day of grant was estimated using a lattice-based option valuation model, including allowance for the exercise price being at a discount to market price.

Share Option Plan

        The Company grants selected executive and other key employees share option awards. For awards prior to fiscal 2004, vesting is contingent upon achieving increases in the Parent's total shareholder

F-52


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

12. Share-Based Compensation (Continued)


return above certain predetermined target levels over a three year performance period. There is an annual retest on a three year rolling basis until options fully vest or lapse at the end of the option period. All option grants made prior to 2004 under the rules approved by shareholders in 1998 have now vested in full. For awards granted commencing in fiscal 2005 vesting is contingent on the Parent's Total Shareholder Return ("TSR") equaling or outperforming that of the HSBC Global Mining Index over a three year period. Vesting is based on a sliding scale with zero vesting for performance below the index up to full vesting for performance of five percent per annum above the index. For grants made from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2006, a single fixed base retest will be made five years after the date of the grant. The grant made in 2004 was tested against the performance condition in 2007. The performance condition was not achieved and these options, therefore, did not vest at that time. The 2004 Share Option Plan grant will, in accordance with the Share Option Plan rules, be retested in 2009. The option grants made in 2005 were tested against the performance condition in 2008. The performance condition was achieved and these options will vest in full. No retest will be made for grants made after fiscal 2006. The performance conditions in relation to TSR have been incorporated in the measurement of fair value for these awards by modeling the correlation between Rio Tinto plc's TSR and that of the index. The relationship between Parent's TSR and the index was simulated many thousands of times to derive a distribution which, in conjunction with the lattice-based option valuation model, was used to determine the fair value of the options.

        Options may, upon exercise, be satisfied by treasury shares, the issue of new shares or the purchase of shares in the market. Currently, it is Parent's intention to satisfy exercises by transferring shares from treasury and RTL's intention to satisfy exercises by the transfer of existing shares. Parent has a policy of settling these awards in equity, although the directors at their discretion can offer a cash alternative. The Company does not have a history of settling these awards in cash. The exercise price of each option, which has a 10-year life, is equal to the average market price of the relevant Company's shares over a five working day period prior to the date of grant. The awards are accounted for in accordance with the requirements applying to equity-settled, share-based payment transactions. The key assumptions used in the valuation of Share option plan and Share Savings plan awards are noted in the following table.

 
  Risk-free
interest rate
%
  Expected
volatility
%
  Dividend
yield
%
  Forfeiture
rates
%
  Expected
term—
Years
 

Awards made in 2005

    4.2 - 5.6     26.0 - 32.0     1.9 - 2.2     3.0 - 10.0     2.0 - 6.2  

Awards made in 2006

    4.3 - 5.4     26.0 - 34.0     1.5 - 1.7     3.0 - 10.0     2.0 - 6.8  

Awards made in 2007

    5.0 - 5.8     27.0 - 35.0     1.5 - 2.4     3.0 - 10.0     2.2 - 5.9  

F-53


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

12. Share-Based Compensation (Continued)

        A summary of the status of the Company's share-based award plans at December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, and changes during the year are presented below.

 
  Number
2005
  Weighted-
average
exercise
price per
option
2005
  Number
2006
  Weighted-
average
exercise
price per
option
2006
  Number
2007
  Weighted-
average
exercise
price per
option
2007
 

Options outstanding at January 1

    285,284   $ 23.20     233,904   $ 23.73     213,501   $ 32.30  

Granted

    58,429     34.62     70,462     42.47     45,773     64.30  

Forfeited

    (3,461 )   24.99     (8,871 )   38.84     (615 )   42.42  

Intra-group transfers in/(out)

    (24,543 )   25.71     (15,115 )   40.31     (48,550 )   32.68  

Exercised

    (65,790 )   21.03     (62,220 )   22.48     (28,917 )   24.06  

Cancellations

    (9,864 )   21.57     (2,095 )   34.08     (1,926 )   39.47  

Expired

    (6,151 )   15.99     (2,564 )   21.17     (305 )   25.57  
                           

Options outstanding at December 31

    233,904   $ 23.73     213,501   $ 32.30     178,961   $ 42.50  
                           

Exercisable

    45,716   $ 19.42     72,609   $ 23.08     37,486   $ 23.97  
                           

Non-vested options at January 1

    264,728   $ 6.86     188,188   $ 6.53     140,892   $ 10.64  

Granted

    58,429     9.08     70,462     12.78     45,773     16.83  

Forfeited

    (3,461 )   6.97     (8,871 )   10.62     (615 )   13.48  

Intra-group transfers in/(out)

    (24,543 )   5.95     (15,115 )   10.50     (21,691 )   10.66  

Cancellations

    (9,864 )   6.93     (2,095 )   10.37     (1,926 )   12.06  

Vested

    (97,101 )   7.33     (91,677 )   5.87     (20,958 )   8.25  
                           

Non-vested options at December 31

    188,188   $ 6.53     140,892   $ 10.64     141,475   $ 13.19  
                           

Mining Companies Comparative Plan

        The Mining Companies Comparative Plan ("MCCP") is a long-term performance share incentive plan which was approved by Parent shareholders at the 1998 and 2004 annual general meetings. Under the MCCP, eligible senior executives and other key employees are annually awarded a conditional right to receive shares. These rights only vest if the performance conditions approved by the Parent Remuneration Committee are satisfied. The performance condition compares Parent's TSR with the TSR of a comparator group of other international mining companies over the same four year period. Awards may, upon vesting, be satisfied by treasury shares, the issue of new shares or the purchase of shares in the market. Awards under this plan are being accounted for in accordance with the requirements applying to cash settled, share-based payment transactions. If any awards are ultimately settled in shares, the liability is transferred directly to equity as the consideration for the equity instruments issued. The grant-date fair value of the awards is taken to be the market value of the shares at the date of award, reduced by fifty percent for anticipated relative TSR performance. In addition, for the valuations after fiscal 2005, the market value is reduced for non-receipt of dividends between measurement date and date of vesting (excluding post fiscal 2003 awards for executive directors and product group chief executive officers). Forfeitures are assumed prior to vesting at three percent per annum of outstanding awards. In accordance with the method of accounting for cash

F-54


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

12. Share-Based Compensation (Continued)


settled awards, fair values are subsequently remeasured each year to reflect the number of awards expected to vest based on the current and anticipated TSR performance. This is achieved by gradually moving, over the life of each award, from the initially assumed fair value of 50% of the market value to the actual percentage of shares ultimately vesting. There were no payments under the plan in 2005 and 2006 payments totaled $60 for the year ended December 31, 2007. The key assumptions used in the valuation are noted in the following table.

 
  Risk-free
interest rate
%
  Expected
volatility
%
  Dividend
yield
%
  Forfeiture
rates
%
  Expected
term—
Years
 

Awards made in 2005

    n/a     n/a     nil     nil     4.0  

Awards made in 2006

    5.4     26.0     1.4 - 1.6     3.0     4.0 - 6.8  

Awards made in 2007

    5.8     27.0     1.1 - 2.2     3.0     3.4 - 5.6  

        A summary of the status of the Company's performance-based share plans at December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, and changes during the year, are presented below.

 
  Number
2005
  Weighted-
average
fair value
at grant
date
2005
  Number
2006
  Weighted-
average
fair value
at grant
date
2006
  Number
2007
  Weighted-
average
fair value
at grant
date
2007
 

Shares outstanding at January 1

    40,674   $ 12.41     59,486   $ 11.64     58,329   $ 14.87  

Granted

    31,034     13.58     30,529     15.75     20,414     24.25  

Intra-group transfers in/(out)

    (12,222 )   12.24     (31,686 )   13.46     (20,217 )   16.10  
                           

Shares outstanding at December 31

    59,486   $ 11.64     58,329   $ 14.87     58,526   $ 18.60  
                           

        During 2005, 2,225 cash settled share options were exercised at a weighted-average exercise price per option of $30.41. There were 2,710 cash settled options granted in 2006 with a weighted-average fair value at grant date of $12.78. The total liability for these awards at December 31, 2006 and 2007 was $10,000 and $90,000, respectively. All outstanding options under the MCCP at December 31, 2007 were unvested.

Management Share Plan

        The Management Share Plan ("MSP") became effective during 2007 to support the Company's ability to attract and retain key staff in an increasingly tight and competitive labor market. Under the MSP, certain members of senior management may receive a conditional award of shares which is subject to a time-based vesting condition. Shares to satisfy the awards will be purchased in the open market. Directors are not eligible to participate and no new shares will be issued to satisfy awards under the MSP. The awards will be settled in equity including the dividends accumulated from date of award to vesting. The awards are accounted for in accordance with the requirements applying to equity-settled, share-based payment transactions. The fair value of each award on the date of grant is set equal to share price on the date of grant. Forfeitures are assumed prior to vesting at three percent per annum of outstanding awards.

F-55


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

12. Share-Based Compensation (Continued)

        During the year ended December 31, 2007, 14,750 shares were granted with a weighted-average fair value of $57.93 at date of grant under the MSP.

13. Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

Operating Leases

        The Company occupies various facilities and leases certain equipment under various lease agreements. The minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases, with lease terms in excess of one year subsequent to December 31, 2007, are as follows:

2008

  $ 554  

2009

    534  

2010

    530  

2011

    512  

2012

    499  

Thereafter

    7,107  
       

  $ 9,736  
       

        Rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 was $3,588, $3,062 and $3,008, respectively.

Heavy Mining Equipment Purchase Commitments

        As of December 31, 2007, the Company had outstanding capital purchase commitments of $50,091 for heavy mining equipment which were not included on the consolidated balance sheet.

Coal Purchase Commitments

        As of December 31, 2007, the Company had outstanding coal purchase commitments of $101,692 for coal purchases which were not included on the consolidated balance sheet. The coal purchase commitments will be utilized for coal sales made to a customer under the terms of a three-year term coal supply agreement.

Contingencies

Litigation

        The Minerals Management Service ("MMS"), a federal agency with responsibility for collecting royalties on coal produced from federal coal leases, issued two disputed assessments against Decker Coal Company ("Decker"): one for coal produced from 1986-1992, and the other for coal produced from 1993-2001. Both assessments concern coal sold by Decker, and in turn resold under long-term contracts. The MMS maintains that Decker's royalties should not be based on the prices at which Decker actually sold coal because the MMS does not believe those prices represent the results of arm's length negotiation. Instead, the MMS seeks to assess royalties based upon a higher price negotiated by

F-56


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

13. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)


the ultimate buyer of the coal in the 1970's. With respect to the period 1986-1992, Decker appealed the assessment through the administrative process with the MMS and that appeal was unsuccessful. A further appeal is now pending before the United States District Court for the District of Montana. With respect to the period 1993-2001, the MMS has not issued a final decision concerning Decker's challenge to the assessment. As of December 31, 2007, the estimated additional assessed royalties (inclusive of interest) for the 1986-1992 assessment are approximately $30,000 and the estimated additional assessed royalties (inclusive of interest) for the 1993-2001 assessment are approximately $10,000. Decker estimates that even if the assessments were to be upheld, MMS's eventual recovery would be between $0 and $40,000. As a result of RTEA's 50% ownership interest in Decker, the Company's financial results could be materially affected, should Decker be unsuccessful in its appeal. RTEA has not accrued a liability in its consolidated financial statements with respect to this matter as any potential losses are not considered to be probable and reasonably estimable. In addition to its substantive challenges to the assessments, Decker believes that it is indemnified by and/or has contractual price escalation protection with respect to any increased assessments. RTEA considers those conclusions to be reasonable, however has not relied upon this indemnification in reaching its decision that any potential losses are not considered probable and reasonably estimable.

        RTEA currently is party to various other legal proceedings. While management currently believes that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or overall trends in results of operations, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties. If an unfavorable ruling were to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the results of operations, cash flows and financial position of RTEA. The estimate of the potential impact on the Company's financial position or overall results of operations or cash flows for the legal proceedings could change in the future. The Company has accrued for all losses related to litigation that the Company considers probable and for which the loss can be reasonably estimated.

Income Tax Contingencies

        The Company has various tax audits in progress. The Company has provided its best estimate of taxes and related interest and penalties due for potential adjustments that may result from the resolution of various tax audits, and examinations of open United States federal and state tax years.

        The Company's income tax calculations are based on application of the respective United States federal or state tax law. The Company's tax filings, however, are subject to audit by the respective tax authorities. Accordingly, the Company recognizes tax benefits when it is more likely than not a position will be upheld by the tax authorities. To the extent the final tax liabilities are different from the amounts originally accrued, the increases or decreases are recorded as income tax expense. Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes."

Concentrations of Risk and Major Customer

        Approximately 90%, 83% and 83% of the Company's revenues for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, were under multi-year contracts which specify pricing terms and expire through 2017. While the majority of the contracts are fixed-price contracts, certain contracts

F-57


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

13. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)


have escalation provisions for determining periodic price changes. One customer represented more than 10% of total consolidated revenues which were $129,944 and $143,742 for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively. Accounts receivable from this customer was $17,822 at December 31, 2006 which was paid in full in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. There were no customers that represented more than 10% of total consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007. The Company generally does not require collateral or other security on accounts receivable because the Company's customers are comprised primarily of investment grade electric utilities. The credit risk is controlled through credit approvals and monitoring procedures.

Guarantees and Off-Balance Sheet Risk

        In the normal course of business, the Company is a party to guarantees and financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, such as bank letters of credit, performance or surety bonds and indemnities, which are not reflected on the consolidated balance sheet. Such guarantees and financial instruments are valued based on the amount of exposure under the respective instrument and the likelihood of required performance. In the Company's past experience, virtually no claims have been made against these financial instruments. Management does not expect any material losses to result from these guarantees or off-balance-sheet instruments.

        United States federal and state laws require the Company to secure certain of its obligations to reclaim lands used for mining and to secure coal lease obligations. The primary method used by the Company to meet its reclamation obligations and to secure coal lease obligations is to provide a third-party surety bond, typically through an insurance company, or provide a letter of credit, typically through a bank. Specific bond and or letter of credit amounts may change over time, depending on the activity at the respective site and any specific requirements by federal or state laws. The changes may be for required increases or decreases to a respective bond or letter of credit amount. The Company considers its surety bonds and letters of credit issued to meet its reclamation obligations and to secure coal lease obligations at the respective mine site to be performance guarantees. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had $328,179 of standby of letters of credit and $395,408 of performance bonds outstanding (including the Company's proportional share of Decker) to secure certain of its obligations to reclaim lands used for mining and to secure coal lease obligations.

        Pursuant to a management agreement, the Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Kennecott Colorado is the general partner and manager of one of the Company's VIE's, Colowyo. The Company's affiliate has guaranteed Kennecott Colorado's performance under the management agreement. In consideration for these performance guarantees, the Company's affiliate received a lien on substantially all of Colowyo's assets, including a second lien on certain long-term coal contracts (the first lien is to the trustee of the bonds).

Black Lung

        In the United States, under the Black Lung Benefits Revenue Act of 1977 and the Black Lung Benefits Reform Act of 1977, as amended in 1981 (the "Black Lung Acts"), each United States coal mine operator must pay federal black lung benefits and medical expenses to claimants who are current and former employees and last worked for the operator before January 1, 1970. Coal mine operators must also make payments to a trust fund for the payment of benefits and medical expenses to claimants

F-58


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

13. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)


who last worked in the coal industry prior to January 1, 1970. The trust fund is funded by an excise tax on United States production of up to $0.55 per ton for surface-mined coal, the amount not to exceed 4.4% of the gross sales price. The Company has established two black lung trusts, the Kennecott Energy and Coal Company Black Lung Benefits Trust and the Spring Creek Coal Company Black Lung Benefits Trust. The trust funds are maintained exclusively to satisfy in whole or in part the liability of the Company for black lung claims, to pay premiums for insurance exclusively covering liability of the Company under the Black Lung Acts and to pay fees and administrative expenses of the plan and the trust. An actuarial valuation for black lung benefits is performed every four years, the most recent of which was performed in 2006. As of December 31, 2007, the trusts were in an overfunded position.

14. Related Party Transactions

Guarantee Fees

        Included in interest expense was $2,119, $2,546 and $1,281 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, for guarantee fees paid to the Parent associated with the outstanding standby letters of credit and performance bonds.

Cash Management Arrangement and Reimbursed Overhead

        The Company has entered into a cash management arrangement with Kennecott Holdings Corporation (KHC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of RTA. Under this arrangement, cash is transferred to and from KHC on a regular basis for investment purposes. Balances resulting from these transactions bear interest at the same rate as the RTA Facility, which was 6.5% as of December 31, 2007. Amounts due from related parties resulting from these transactions are included in the table below. Interest income related to transactions with KHC totaled $1,105, $2,865 and $6,308 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

        KHC and Rio Tinto Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of RTA, also fund certain Company overhead expenses which are reimbursed by the Company. Amounts due to related parties resulting from these transactions are non-interest bearing and are included in the table below.

        Due from (to) related parties consisted of the following at December 31:

 
  2006   2007  

Kennecott Holdings Corporation:

             
 

Cash management arrangement

  $ 105,578   $ 82,728  
 

Reimbursed overhead

    (178,735 )   (238,097 )

Rio Tinto America:

             
 

Income tax sharing agreement

    (1,302 )   (2,968 )

Other

    (238 )   (688 )
           

  $ (74,697 ) $ (159,025 )
           

F-59


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

14. Related Party Transactions (Continued)

Other RTA Transactions

        The Company began leasing office space from RTA during 2007. Included in rental expense was $690 for the year ended December 31, 2007 for rent paid to RTA. Additionally, the Company purchased land and equipment from RTA for $1,099 and $5,100, respectively, during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. The Company sold equipment to RTA at its net book value of $660 during the year ended December 31, 2006.

        The Company paid cash in excess of expense of $8,192, $941 and $2,466 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, to RTA related to Rio Tinto stock option plans and its federal tax sharing agreement. These amounts have been reflected as dividends to Parent in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

15. Segment Information

        The Company reviews, manages and operates its business as a single operating segment, coal production. The Company produces low sulfur, steam coal from surface mines, located in the Western region of the United States within the Powder River and Uinta Basins, which it sells to electric utilities and industrial customers. Under the guidance in FAS 131, management has determined it has one reportable segment primarily based on its chief operating decision maker assessing the Company's performance and allocating resources based on a measure derived from the Company's consolidated EBITDA ("Internal reporting EBITDA") financial measurement. Management defines EBITDA as net income; plus interest expense, depreciation and depletion, accretion, amortization and income tax provision, less interest income. The primary differences between Internal reporting EBITDA and EBITDA are that Internal reporting EBITDA excludes asset impairment charges, environmental liability expenses, overburden stripping costs, pension and postretirement healthcare costs and certain costs allocated from other Parent companies.

        The following table presents a summary of total revenues from external customers by geographic location for the years ended December 31:

 
  2005   2006   2007  

United States

  $ 1,160,916   $ 1,396,707   $ 1,533,628  

Foreign

    18,727     27,537     25,093  
               
 

Total revenues from external customers

  $ 1,179,643   $ 1,424,244   $ 1,558,721  
               

        The Company attributes revenue to individual countries based on the location of the customer.

        As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, all of the Company's long-lived assets were located in the United States. All of the Company's revenues for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 originated in the United States. The Company's segment revenue and segment total assets equal the consolidated amounts in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

F-60


Table of Contents

RIO TINTO ENERGY AMERICA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

15. Segment Information (Continued)

        The following table presents a reconciliation of Internal reporting EBITDA to net income for the years ended December 31:

 
  2005   2006   2007  

Internal reporting EBITDA

  $ 257,884   $ 301,100   $ 329,424  

Adjustments

    (10,404 )   (22,324 )   (50,262 )
               

EBITDA

    247,480     278,776     279,162  

Depreciation and depletion

    (91,849 )   (122,254 )   (139,167 )

Amortization

    (45,279 )   (44,577 )   (42,312 )

Accretion

    (11,485 )   (14,334 )   (15,665 )

Interest income

    1,659     3,829     7,577  

Interest expense

    (49,570 )   (56,568 )   (54,262 )

Income tax provision

    (11,194 )   (6,894 )   (2,489 )
               

Net income

  $ 39,762   $ 37,978   $ 32,844  
               

F-61


GRAPHIC



PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUS

Item 13.    Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.

        Other expenses in connection with the issuance and distribution of the securities to be registered hereunder will be substantially as follows (all amounts are estimated except the Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority filing fee):

Item
  Amount  

Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee

  $ 39,300  

FINRA filing fee

  $ 75,500  

NYSE fee

    *  

Blue Sky filing fees and expenses

    *  

Accounting fees and expenses

    *  

Legal fees and expenses

    *  

Transfer agent fees and expenses

    *  

Printing and engraving expenses

    *  

Miscellaneous expenses

    *  
       
 

Total

  $ *  

*
To be filed by amendment.

        The Registrant will bear all expenses shown above.

Item 14.    Indemnification of Directors and Officers.

        Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law permits a Delaware corporation to indemnify its officers, directors and other corporate agents to the extent and under the circumstances set forth therein. Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that we will indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that he is or was our director or officer, or is or was serving at our request as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, in accordance with provisions corresponding to Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. These indemnification provisions may be sufficiently broad to permit indemnification of the registrant's executive officers and directors for liabilities, including reimbursement of expenses incurred, arising under the Securities Act.

        Pursuant to Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, our certificate of incorporation eliminates the personal liability of a director to us or our shareholders for monetary damages for a breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liabilities arising:


        The above discussion of Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law and of our amended certificate of incorporation and bylaws is not intended to be exhaustive and is respectively qualified in its entirety by Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws.

II-1


        As permitted by Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, we will carry primary and excess insurance policies insuring our directors and officers against certain liabilities they may incur in their capacity as directors and officers. Under the policies, the insurer, on our behalf, may also pay amounts for which we granted indemnification to our directors and officers.

        In addition, the underwriting agreement to be filed as Exhibit 1.1 to this Registration Statement provides that the underwriters will indemnify us and our executive officers and directors for certain liabilities, including liabilities arising under the Securities Act, or otherwise.

Item 15.    Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.

        We were incorporated on July 31, 2008 under the laws of the State of Delaware. In connection with our formation, we issued one share of our common stock to Rio Tinto America Inc., a subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc, for an aggregate purchase price of $1.00. This security was offered and sold by us in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

Item 16.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

        (a)   Exhibits.


INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit
Number
  Description of Documents
 

1.1*

 

Form of Underwriting Agreement

 

3.1**

 

Certificate of Incorporation of Cloud Peak Energy Inc.

 

3.2*

 

Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cloud Peak Energy Inc. to be effective upon the closing of the offering being made pursuant to this Registration Statement

 

3.3**

 

Bylaws of Cloud Peak Energy Inc.

 

3.4*

 

Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of Cloud Peak Energy Inc. to be effective upon the closing of the offering being made pursuant to this Registration Statement

 

3.5*

 

Form of Certificate of Designations relating to the Series A Preferred Stock

 

4.1*

 

Form of stock certificate of Cloud Peak Energy Inc.

 

5.1**

 

Opinion of Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP as to the legality of the securities being registered

 

10.1**

 

Federal Coal Lease WYW-151643: Antelope Coal Mine.

 

10.2**

 

Federal Coal Lease WYW-141435: Antelope Coal Mine.

 

10.3**

 

Federal Coal Lease WYW-0321780: Antelope Coal Mine.

 

10.4**

 

Federal Coal Lease WYW-0322255: Antelope Coal Mine.

 

10.5**

 

State of Wyoming Coal Lease No. 0-22695: Antelope Coal Mine.

 

10.6**

 

Federal Coal Lease WYW-8385: Cordero-Rojo Mine.

 

10.7**

 

Federal Coal Lease WYW-23929: Cordero-Rojo Mine.

 

10.8**

 

State of Wyoming Coal Lease No. 0-26935-A: Cordero-Rojo Mine.

 

10.9**

 

State of Wyoming Coal Lease No. 0-26936-A: Cordero-Rojo Mine.

 

10.10**

 

Federal Coal Lease WYW-117924: Jacobs Ranch Mine.

 

10.11**

 

Federal Coal Lease WYW-146744: Jacobs Ranch Mine; Lease Modification, dated June 19, 2006.

 

10.12**

 

Letter from United States Department of the Interior to Jacobs Ranch Coal Company, dated June 19, 2006, regarding Federal Coal Lease WYW-146744.

 

10.13**

 

Federal Coal Lease MTM-88405: Spring Creek Mine.

 

10.14**

 

Federal Coal Lease MTM-069782: Spring Creek Mine.

 

10.15**

 

Federal Coal Lease MTM-94378: Spring Creek Mine.

II-2


Exhibit
Number
  Description of Documents
 

10.16**

 

State of Montana Coal Lease No. C-1101-00: Spring Creek Mine.

 

10.17**

 

State of Montana Coal Lease No. C-1099-00: Spring Creek Mine.

 

10.18**

 

State of Montana Coal Lease No. C-1100-00: Spring Creek Mine.

 

10.19**

 

State of Montana Coal Lease No. C-1088-05: Spring Creek Mine.

 

10.20**

 

Agreement by and among Western Minerals, Inc., Wytana, Inc., Montana Royalty Company, Ltd. and Peter Kiewit Sons' Inc., dated September 1, 1970, as amended by supplement dated as of January 1, 1974, amendment No. 2 dated as of December 1, 1977, amendment No. 3, dated as of August 24, 1978, amendment No. 4, dated as of January 1, 1982, amendment No. 5, dated as of July 9, 1983, amendment No. 6, dated as of May 7, 1985, amendment No. 7, dated as of January 1, 1989, amendment No. 8, dated as of January 1, 1989, amendment No. 9, dated as of December 13, 1990 (sic), amendment No. 10, dated as of January 1, 1999, and amendment No. 11, dated as of April 9, 2002.

 

10.21**

 

Intercompany Loan Agreement by and among Kennecott Energy and Coal Company and Rio Tinto America Inc., dated June 24, 1998, as amended on June 14, 1999 and February 28, 2003.

 

10.22*

 

Form of Master Separation Agreement between Rio Tinto America Inc. and Cloud Peak Energy Inc.

 

10.23*

 

Form of Transition Services Agreements between Rio Tinto Shared Services Inc. and Cloud Peak Energy Inc.

 

10.24*

 

Form of Tax Receivable Agreement between Rio Tinto America Inc. and Cloud Peak Energy Inc.

 

10.25*

 

Form of Registration Rights Agreement between Rio Tinto America Inc. and Cloud Peak Energy Inc.

 

10.26*

 

Form of Employee Matters Agreement

 

10.27**

 

Federal Coal Lease WYW174407: Cordero-Rojo Mine.

 

10.28*

 

Cloud Peak Energy Inc. 2008 Long Term Incentive Plan

 

10.29*

 

Form of IPO Stock Option Agreement under the Cloud Peak Energy Inc. 2008 Long Term Incentive Plan

 

10.30*

 

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Cloud Peak Energy Inc. 2008 Long Term Incentive Plan

 

10.31*

 

Form of Annual Stock Option Agreement under the Cloud Peak Energy Inc. 2008 Long Term Incentive Plan

 

10.32*

 

Form of IPO Restricted Stock Agreement under the Cloud Peak Energy Inc. 2008 Long Term Incentive Plan

 

10.33*

 

Form of Short Term Incentive Plan

 

10.34*

 

Cloud Peak Energy Inc. 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

10.35*

 

Employment Agreement between Cloud Peak Energy Inc. and Colin Marshall dated as of            , 2008

 

10.36*

 

Employment Agreement between Cloud Peak Energy Inc. and Michael Barrett dated as of            , 2008

 

10.37*

 

Form of Trademark Licence Agreement between Rio Tinto London Limited and Cloud Peak Energy Inc.

 

21.1*

 

List of subsidiaries of Cloud Peak Energy Inc.

 

23.1

 

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

23.2

 

Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

II-3


Exhibit
Number
  Description of Documents
 

23.3**

 

Consent of Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1)

 

23.4**

 

Consent of John T. Boyd Company

 

24.1

 

Power of Attorney

 

99.1**

 

Consent of Director Nominee

 

99.2

 

Consent of Director Nominee


*
To be filed by amendment.

**
Previously filed.

        (b)   Financial Statement Schedules.

Item 17.    Undertakings.

        Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

        The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:

II-4



SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized, in the City of Gillette, State of Wyoming, on October 17, 2008.

    Cloud Peak Energy Inc.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ 
COLIN MARSHALL 

Colin Marshall
Principal Executive Officer

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Name and Signatures
 
Title
 
Date

 

 

 

 

 
/s/ COLIN MARSHALL 

Colin Marshall
  (Principal Executive Officer and Director)   October 17, 2008


/s/ 
MICHAEL BARRETT 

Michael Barrett


 


(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)


 


October 17, 2008

*

Preston Chiaro

 

(Director)

 

October 17, 2008

*

Wayne W. Murdy

 

(Chairman of the Board of Directors)

 

October 17, 2008

*By:

 

/s/ 
COLIN MARSHALL 

Attorney-in-Fact

 

 

II-5



INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit
Number
  Description of Documents
 

1.1*

 

Form of Underwriting Agreement

 

3.1**

 

Certificate of Incorporation of Cloud Peak Energy Inc.

 

3.2*

 

Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cloud Peak Energy Inc. to be effective upon the closing of the offering being made pursuant to this Registration Statement

 

3.3**

 

Bylaws of Cloud Peak Energy Inc.

 

3.4*

 

Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of Cloud Peak Energy Inc. to be effective upon the closing of the offering being made pursuant to this Registration Statement

 

3.5*

 

Form of Certificate of Designations relating to the Series A Preferred Stock

 

4.1*

 

Form of stock certificate of Cloud Peak Energy Inc.

 

5.1**

 

Opinion of Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP as to the legality of the securities being registered

 

10.1**

 

Federal Coal Lease WYW-151643: Antelope Coal Mine.

 

10.2**

 

Federal Coal Lease WYW-141435: Antelope Coal Mine.

 

10.3**

 

Federal Coal Lease WYW-0321780: Antelope Coal Mine.

 

10.4**

 

Federal Coal Lease WYW-0322255: Antelope Coal Mine.

 

10.5**

 

State of Wyoming Coal Lease No. 0-22695: Antelope Coal Mine.

 

10.6**

 

Federal Coal Lease WYW-8385: Cordero-Rojo Mine.

 

10.7**

 

Federal Coal Lease WYW-23929: Cordero-Rojo Mine.

 

10.8**

 

State of Wyoming Coal Lease No. 0-26935-A: Cordero-Rojo Mine.

 

10.9**

 

State of Wyoming Coal Lease No. 0-26936-A: Cordero-Rojo Mine.

 

10.10**

 

Federal Coal Lease WYW-117924: Jacobs Ranch Mine.

 

10.11**

 

Federal Coal Lease WYW-146744: Jacobs Ranch Mine; Lease Modification, dated June 19, 2006.

 

10.12**

 

Letter from United States Department of the Interior to Jacobs Ranch Coal Company, dated June 19, 2006, regarding Federal Coal Lease WYW-146744.

 

10.13**

 

Federal Coal Lease MTM-88405: Spring Creek Mine.

 

10.14**

 

Federal Coal Lease MTM-069782: Spring Creek Mine.

 

10.15**

 

Federal Coal Lease MTM-94378: Spring Creek Mine.

 

10.16**

 

State of Montana Coal Lease No. C-1101-00: Spring Creek Mine.

 

10.17**

 

State of Montana Coal Lease No. C-1099-00: Spring Creek Mine.

 

10.18**

 

State of Montana Coal Lease No. C-1100-00: Spring Creek Mine.

 

10.19**

 

State of Montana Coal Lease No. C-1088-05: Spring Creek Mine.

 

10.20**

 

Agreement by and among Western Minerals, Inc., Wytana, Inc., Montana Royalty Company, Ltd. and Peter Kiewit Sons' Inc., dated September 1, 1970, as amended by supplement dated as of January 1, 1974, amendment No. 2 dated as of December 1, 1977, amendment No. 3, dated as of August 24, 1978, amendment No. 4, dated as of January 1, 1982, amendment No. 5, dated as of July 9, 1983, amendment No. 6, dated as of May 7, 1985, amendment No. 7, dated as of January 1, 1989, amendment No. 8, dated as of January 1, 1989, amendment No. 9, dated as of December 13, 1990 (sic), amendment No. 10, dated as of January 1, 1999, and amendment No. 11, dated as of April 9, 2002.

 

10.21**

 

Intercompany Loan Agreement by and among Kennecott Energy and Coal Company and Rio Tinto America Inc., dated June 24, 1998, as amended on June 14, 1999 and February 28, 2003.

 

10.22*

 

Form of Master Separation Agreement between Rio Tinto America Inc. and Cloud Peak Energy Inc.

 

10.23*

 

Form of Transition Services Agreements between Rio Tinto Shared Services Inc. and Cloud Peak Energy Inc.

 

10.24*

 

Form of Tax Receivable Agreement between Rio Tinto America Inc. and Cloud Peak Energy Inc.

 

10.25*

 

Form of Registration Rights Agreement between Rio Tinto America Inc. and Cloud Peak Energy Inc.


Exhibit
Number
  Description of Documents
 

10.26*

 

Form of Employee Matters Agreement

 

10.27**

 

Federal Coal Lease WYW174407: Cordero-Rojo Mine.

 

10.28*

 

Cloud Peak Energy Inc. 2008 Long Term Incentive Plan

 

10.29*

 

Form of IPO Stock Option Agreement under the Cloud Peak Energy Inc. 2008 Long Term Incentive Plan

 

10.30*

 

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Cloud Peak Energy Inc. 2008 Long Term Incentive Plan

 

10.31*

 

Form of Annual Stock Option Agreement under the Cloud Peak Energy Inc. 2008 Long Term Incentive Plan

 

10.32*

 

Form of IPO Restricted Stock Agreement under the Cloud Peak Energy Inc. 2008 Long Term Incentive Plan

 

10.33*

 

Form of Short Term Incentive Plan

 

10.34*

 

Cloud Peak Energy Inc. 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

10.35*

 

Employment Agreement between Cloud Peak Energy Inc. and Colin Marshall dated as of            , 2008

 

10.36*

 

Employment Agreement between Cloud Peak Energy Inc. and Michael Barrett dated as of            , 2008

 

10.37*

 

Form of Trademark Licence Agreement between Rio Tinto London Limited and Cloud Peak Energy Inc.

 

21.1*

 

List of subsidiaries of Cloud Peak Energy Inc.

 

23.1

 

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

23.2

 

Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

23.3**

 

Consent of Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1)

 

23.4**

 

Consent of John T. Boyd Company

 

24.1

 

Power of Attorney

 

99.1**

 

Consent of Director Nominee

 

99.2

 

Consent of Director Nominee


*
To be filed by amendment.

**
Previously filed.



Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated by Reference

This ‘S-1/A’ Filing    Date    Other Filings
12/31/1310-K
12/31/1210-K
12/31/1110-K
12/1/11
7/1/118-K,  S-8
12/31/1010-K
12/31/0910-K,  5
6/30/09
5/31/09
3/1/09
1/1/09
12/31/08
12/15/08
11/15/08
Filed on:10/17/08
10/7/08
10/5/08
10/1/08S-1
9/30/08
9/24/08
8/7/08
8/1/08
7/31/08
7/1/08
6/30/08
4/28/08
4/22/08
3/31/08
2/12/08
1/1/08
12/31/07
12/1/07
11/15/07
10/31/07
7/1/07
6/30/07
6/5/07
4/1/07
3/31/07
1/1/07
12/31/06
6/19/06
5/11/06
1/1/06
12/31/05
6/30/05
3/1/05
1/1/05
12/31/04
1/1/04
12/31/03
12/8/03
6/30/03
2/28/03
1/1/03
4/9/02
1/1/00
6/14/99
1/1/99
6/30/98
6/24/98
 List all Filings 
Top
Filing Submission 0001047469-08-011034   –   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)

Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Wed., Apr. 24, 2:59:16.3am ET