SEC Info℠

Home

Search

My Interests

Help

Sign In

Please Sign In

Teletech Holdings Inc – ‘10-Q’ for 6/30/03

On:  Thursday, 8/14/03, at 3:13pm ET   ·   For:  6/30/03   ·   Accession #:  1047469-3-27709   ·   File #:  1-11919

Previous ‘10-Q’:  ‘10-Q’ on 5/13/03 for 3/31/03   ·   Next:  ‘10-Q’ on 11/5/03 for 9/30/03   ·   Latest:  ‘10-Q’ on 11/8/23 for 9/30/23

in

this entire Filing. an “Entity” Search.

Show

Documents searched

and

each “hit”. the 1st “hit”.

↓↑Hints

 Text Wildcards:  ? (any letter/digit),  * (many).  Search Logic:  for Documents:  & (and),  | (or);  for Text:  | (anywhere),  "(&)" (near).  Details... 

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size              Issuer               Agent

 8/14/03  Teletech Holdings Inc             10-Q        6/30/03    3:430K                                   Merrill Corp/New/FA

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: 10-Q        Quarterly Report                                    HTML    436K 
 2: EX-31       Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 302)  HTML     16K 
 3: EX-32       Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)  HTML      9K 

Use these links to rapidly review the document
TELETECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FORM 10-Q INDEX

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

Commission File Number 0-21055

TeleTech Holdings, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

9197 South Peoria Street
Englewood, Colorado 80112
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (303) 397-8100

        Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past (90) days. YES ý    NO o

        Indicate by check mark if an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES ý    NO o

        Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

TELETECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

2

Item 1.

TELETECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Amounts in thousands except share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

TELETECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Amounts in thousands except per share data)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

TELETECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Amounts in thousands)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

TELETECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2003

(1) OVERVIEW AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Overview

        TeleTech Holdings, Inc. ("TeleTech" or the "Company") is a global provider of customer management services for multi-national companies in the United States, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Mexico, New Zealand, Northern Ireland, the Philippines, Scotland, Singapore and Spain. Customer management encompasses a wide range of customer acquisition, retention and satisfaction programs designed to maximize the value of the relationship between the Company's clients and their customers.

Basis of Presentation

        The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared without audit pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring entries) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the financial position at June 30, 2003, and the results of operations and cash flows of the Company and its subsidiaries for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002. Operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2003.

        The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Footnotes thereto included in the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. Certain 2002 amounts have been reclassified to conform to 2003 presentation.

(2) EFFECTS OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

        On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement on Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." SFAS No. 142 provides guidance on the accounting for goodwill and other intangibles, specifically relating to identifying and allocating the purchase price in business combinations to specific identifiable intangible assets. Additionally, SFAS No. 142 provides guidance for the amortization of identifiable intangible assets and states that goodwill shall not be amortized, but rather tested for impairment, at least annually, using a fair value approach. In connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 142 in the first quarter of 2002, the Company recorded a transitional impairment of approximately $11.5 million related to the goodwill of its Latin American reporting unit. The impairment is reflected as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2002. The Company has restated the six months ended June 30, 2002 to properly reflect no tax effect on the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle as further discussed in Note 14 to the Company's Financial Statements included in its Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

        On January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations," which establishes accounting standards for recognition and measurement of a liability for an asset retirement obligation and the associated asset retirement cost. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company.

6

        On January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS No. 145, "Recission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections," which eliminated inconsistency between required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company.

        On January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities," which specifies that a liability for the cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized at the date of an entity's commitment to an exit plan. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company.

        In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure." SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. SFAS No. 148 also required that disclosures of the pro forma effect of using the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation be displayed more prominently and in a tabular format. The Company has implemented all required disclosures of SFAS No. 148. The Company has not transitioned to a fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation.

        In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51" ("FIN 46"). FIN 46 requires the consolidation of entities in which an enterprise absorbs a majority of an entity's expected losses, receives a majority of an entity's expected residual returns, or both, as a result of ownership, contractual or other financial interest in an entity. Currently, entities are generally consolidated by an enterprise when it has a controlling financial interest through ownership of a majority voting interest in the entity. The Company did not have any material variable interest entities as of June 30, 2003.

        In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company.

        In April 2003, the FASB decided to require all companies to expense the fair value of employee stock options by no later than 2005. While the FASB has decided in principle to measure compensation at the date of grant, no guidance has been given as to how the cost of employee stock options should be measured. SFAS No. 123 requires use of an option-pricing model to determine fair value, such as Black-Scholes. The FASB plans to issue an exposure draft later this year that will provide more guidance.

(3) SEGMENT INFORMATION

        The Company classifies its business activities into three fundamental segments: North American Outsourcing, International Outsourcing, and Database Marketing and Consulting. These segments are consistent with the Company's management of the business and reflect its internal financial reporting structure and operating focus. North American and International Outsourcing provide comprehensive customer management services. North American Outsourcing consists of customer management services provided to United States' and Canadian clients while International Outsourcing consists of all other

7

countries. Database Marketing and Consulting provide outsourced database management, direct marketing and related customer retention services for automobile dealerships and manufacturers. All intercompany transactions between the reported segments for the periods presented have been eliminated.

        As discussed further in Management's Discussion and Analysis, it is a significant Company strategy to leverage the lower cost opportunities offered by certain international countries. Accordingly, the Company provides services to certain U.S. clients from customer management centers in Canada, Latin America and the Philippines. Under this arrangement, while the U.S. subsidiary bills and collects from the end client, the U.S. subsidiary also enters into a contract with the foreign subsidiary to reimburse the foreign subsidiary for their costs plus a reasonable profit. As a result, a portion of the profits from these client contracts are recorded in the U.S. while a portion are recorded in the foreign location. For U.S. clients being fulfilled from Canadian locations or the Philippines, which represents the majority of these arrangements, the profits all remain within the North American Outsourcing segment. For U.S. clients being fulfilled from other countries, a portion of the profits are reflected in the International Outsourcing segment. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, approximately $0.9 million of operating income in the International Outsourcing segment was generated from these arrangements. There are also situations where certain foreign subsidiaries will contract with other foreign subsidiaries to fulfill client contracts. In these situations, while the profits are partially recorded in each country, on a segment basis they are all reflected in the International Outsourcing segment.

        In January 2003, the Company adopted the practice of allocating corporate operating expenses to segments based upon the segments' respective pro rata percentage of consolidated revenues. Prior to January 1, 2003, corporate operating expenses were shown as a separate segment. The information as of December 31, 2002 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 has been restated to reflect this change.

8

        The following table includes revenues based on the geographic location in which the services are provided:

9

(4) COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

        The Company's comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 was as follows:

        At June 30, 2003, accumulated comprehensive loss consists of $11.2 million and $1.0 million of foreign currency translation adjustments and derivative valuation, respectively.

(5) EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

        Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing the Company's net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The impact of any potentially dilutive securities is excluded. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing the Company's net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares and dilutive potential shares outstanding during the period. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods indicated:

        For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, 10.2 million and 9.6 million options, respectively, to purchase shares of common stock were outstanding but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive. For the

10

three and six months ended June 30, 2002, 4.2 million and 3.9 million options, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the impact would have been anti-dilutive. The Company has also excluded the impact of outstanding warrants as the impact was anti-dilutive for all periods presented.

(6) DEBT

        The Company has a revolving line of credit with a syndicate of five banks (the "Revolver"). Under the terms of the Revolver, the Company may borrow up to $85.0 million with the ability to increase the borrowing limit by an additional $50.0 million (subject to bank approval) within three years from the closing date of the Revolver (October 2002). The Revolver matures on December 28, 2006 at which time a balloon payment for the principal amount is due, however, there is no penalty for early prepayment. The Revolver bears interest at a variable rate based on LIBOR. The interest rate will also vary based on the Company leverage ratios (as defined in the agreement). At June 30, 2003 the interest rate was 2.5% per annum. The Revolver is unsecured but is guaranteed by all of the Company's domestic subsidiaries. At June 30, 2003, $39.0 million was drawn under the Revolver. A significant restrictive covenant under the Revolver requires the Company to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio as defined in the agreement.

        The Company also has $75.0 million of Senior Notes which bear interest at rates ranging from 7.0% to 7.4% per annum. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually and principal payments commence in October 2004 with final maturity in October 2011. A significant restrictive covenant under the Senior Notes requires the Company to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. Additionally, in the event the Senior Notes were to be repaid in full prior to maturity, the Company would have to remit a "make whole" payment to the holders of the Senior Notes. As of June 30, 2003, the make whole payment is approximately $11.9 million.

        During the second quarter of 2003, the Company was not in compliance with the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and minimum consolidated net worth covenants under the Revolver and the fixed charge coverage ratio and consolidated adjusted net worth covenants under the Senior Notes. The Company has worked with the lenders to successfully amend both agreements bringing the Company back into compliance. While the Revolver and Senior Notes had subsidiary guarantees, they were not secured by the Company assets. In connection with obtaining the amendments, the Company has agreed to securitize the Revolver and Senior Notes with a majority of the Company's domestic assets. As part of the securitization process, the two lending groups need to execute an intercreditor agreement. If an intercreditor agreement is not in place by September 30, 2003, the lenders could declare the Revolver and Senior Notes in default. The lenders and the Company believe they will be able to execute the intercreditor agreement by September 30, 2003. However, no assurance can be given that the parties will be successful in these efforts. Additionally, the interest rates that the Company pays under the Revolver and Senior Notes will increase as well under the amended agreements. The Company believes that annual interest expense will increase by approximately $2.0 million a year from current levels under the Revolver and Senior Notes as amended. The Company believes that based on the amended agreements it will be able to maintain compliance with the financial covenants. However, there is no assurance that the Company will maintain compliance

11

with financial covenants in the future and, in the event of a default, no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining waivers or future amendments.

(7) INCOME TAXES

        The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future income tax consequences of transactions that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. When circumstances warrant, the Company assesses the likelihood that its net deferred tax assets will more likely than not be recovered from future projected taxable income. Management judgment has been used in forecasting future taxable income.

        During the second quarter of 2003, the Company updated its analysis of the recoverability of its deferred tax asset due to a change in facts and circumstances. While the Company had reported net losses during 2002 and 2001, management believed they were primarily due to site closures, restructurings and adjusting assets to their net realizable value, and that operating results were profitable without such charges. Further, management expected 2003 and future operations to return to profitability. During the second quarter of 2003, the Company again incurred a net loss. The net loss was the result of both core operating results along with charges for site closures, restructurings and asset recoverability. These represent a different set of facts and circumstances from year-end and, accordingly, the Company determined that it was appropriate under current circumstances to record a valuation allowance for its deferred tax asset.

        SFAS 109 provides for the weighing of positive and negative evidence in determining whether it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset is recoverable. The Company also prepared a forecast of future taxable income, including domestic and international operating results and the reversal of existing temporary differences between income recognized under generally accepted accounting principles and income for federal income tax reporting purposes. Relevant accounting guidance suggests that a recent history of cumulative losses constitutes significant negative evidence, and that future expectations about taxable income are overshadowed by such recent losses. Accordingly, the expectations of future taxable income would generally be limited to no more than two or three years for generating sufficient income to recover deferred tax assets. Based on the Company's evaluation of positive and negative evidence, along with forecasted taxable income (loss) over the next two to three years, management determined to establish a valuation allowance of $31.9 million.

        As of June 30, 2003, after recording the valuation allowance, the Company has approximately $4.9 million of unreserved deferred tax assets related to its consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. That balance represents the amount of taxes recoverable from an available operating loss carryback. Management believes that the unreserved deferred tax asset should not exceed the amount of available carryback until facts and circumstances change and support a different position. Accordingly, for those entities that are part of the consolidated U.S. federal income tax return, the tax expense or benefit that would be derived from multiplying their effective tax rate by the book income or loss before taxes will

12

be offset by an equal amount of increase or decrease in the deferred tax valuation allowance. As a result, income tax expense or benefit will be $0 for those entities.

        The Company has approximately $6.0 million of net deferred tax assets related to certain international countries that could become impaired if future profitability does not improve.

        An analysis of tax expense is as follows:

(8) STOCK OPTION ACCOUNTING

        The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB 25"), and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. Under APB 25, because the exercise price of the company's employee stock options is generally equal to the market price of the underlying stock on the date of the grant, no compensation expense is recognized. SFAS No. 123, "Accounting and Disclosure of Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS 123"), establishes an alternative method of expense recognition for stock-based compensation awards to employees based on fair values. The Company elected not to adopt SFAS 123 for expense recognition purposes.

        The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation (in thousands except per share data):

13

(9) DERIVATIVES

        The Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS 133"). SFAS No. 133 requires every derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) to be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value, with changes in the fair value of qualifying hedges recorded in other comprehensive income. SFAS 133 requires that changes in a derivative's fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Special accounting for qualifying hedges allows a derivative's gains and losses to offset the related results of the hedged item and requires that a Company must formally document, designate and assess the effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting treatment. Based on the criteria established by SFAS No. 133, all of the Company's hedges consisting of an interest rate swap and foreign currency options and exchange contracts are deemed effective. While the Company expects that its derivative instruments will continue to meet the conditions for hedge accounting, if the hedges did not qualify as highly effective or if the Company did not believe that forecasted transactions would occur, the changes in the fair value of the derivatives used as hedges would be reflected in earnings. The Company does not believe it is exposed to more than a nominal amount of credit risk in its hedging activities, as the counterparties are established, well-capitalized financial institutions.

        At June 30, 2003, the Company has an interest rate swap designated as a cash flow hedge. The Company had a synthetic lease for its headquarters building for which the required lease payments were variable based on LIBOR. In February 2003, the synthetic lease was terminated when the Company purchased the corporate headquarters building for the contractual price in the synthetic lease of $38.2 million using proceeds from the revolving line of credit ("Revolver"). The repayment terms under the Revolver are identical to that of the synthetic lease. On December 12, 2000, the Company entered into an interest rate swap in which the Company receives LIBOR and pays fixed rate interest of 6.12%. The swap agreement has a notional amount of approximately $38.2 million and has a six-year term. The purchase of the corporate headquarters building did not cause a termination of the designation of the interest rate swap as a hedge because at inception the Company designated the swap as a hedge of the floating LIBOR which it continues to pay under the Revolver. As of June 30, 2003, the Company has a derivative liability associated with this swap of approximately $5.4 million, which is reflected in other liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. In the event that the Company wanted to terminate the swap, the above mentioned liability would have to be settled with cash and a charge to operations recorded over the remaining life of the debt. Likewise, if the Company repaid the associated Revolver balance, the hedge would no longer be effective and a corresponding charge to operations would be recorded.

        The Company's Canadian subsidiary's functional currency is the Canadian dollar which is used to pay labor and other operating costs in Canada. However, the subsidiary has customer contracts where it is paid in U.S. dollars and the Company has contracted with several commercial banks at no material cost, to acquire, under forward exchange contracts and options, a total of $117.1 million Canadian dollars through May 2005 at a fixed price in U.S. dollars of $76.4 million to hedge its foreign currency risk. During the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Company recorded a $3.2 million gain and a $0.1 million gain, respectively, for settled forward contracts in its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations relating to Canadian dollar forward contracts. As of June 30, 2003, the Company has derivative assets of $8.9 million associated with foreign exchange contracts consisting of the fair market value of forward exchange contracts and options outstanding.

14

        During 2003, the Company determined to settle the intercompany receivable and payable balances that result from these arrangements periodically and, accordingly, the transaction gains and losses from fluctuations in exchange rates are included in determining net income (loss). For the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company recorded transaction losses of $2.1 million in Other Income (Expense) related to the intercompany receivables/payable balances generated from labor arbitrage activities. In the future, management intends to settle these intercompany balances monthly and, accordingly, expects to mitigate the exposure caused by changes in foreign exchange rates.

        During the three months ended June 30, 2003, the Company determined to record the gains/losses from settled Canadian dollar hedges in Costs of Services in order to better match the hedging transactions with the labor costs being hedged. Such amounts were previously recorded in Other Income (Expense). Operating results for 2003 have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation. Operating results for 2002 have not been reclassified as the amounts were immaterial.

(10) RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

        During the three months ended June 30, 2003, the North American Outsourcing segment recorded restructuring charges of approximately $0.9 million related to the closure of its Kansas City, Kansas facility being used to serve the United States Postal Service ("USPS"). These charges consist of a fee paid to the landlord for the early termination of the lease along with an accrual for a grant from the State of Kansas that will have to be repaid. The grant repayment amount is currently under negotiation and the amount accrued represents management's best estimate of what will be paid. The charges for the closure of Kansas City were partially offset by the reversal of approximately $0.2 million which represents an excess accrual related to a 2002 restructuring. Further, the International Outsourcing segment recorded restructuring charges of approximately $1.0 million for severance and other termination benefits related to a reduction in force of approximately 120 administrative employees in Mexico. Additionally, during the three months ended March 31, 2003, the Company's North American Outsourcing segment paid $0.4 million of termination benefits for 591 employees at a managed center in Atlanta, Georgia that was shut down in March 2003. Further, during the first quarter of 2003, the Company reversed approximately $1.0 million of excess accruals related to 2002 restructuring events. The reversal of excess accruals has been offset against the restructuring expense in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

        Upon abandoning the Kansas City facility during the third quarter, the Company will incur a charge of $0.3 million to impair the associated lease for the remaining lease liability which it will record during the month it ceases using the facility.

        During 2002, the Company recorded restructuring charges associated with the termination of approximately 400 administrative employees throughout the world, the impairment of a property lease in the U.S. and the closure of customer management centers ("CMCs") in Spain totaling approximately $9.5 million.

15

        A rollforward of the activity in the above-mentioned restructuring accruals is as follows:

        The restructuring accrual is included in Other Accrued Expenses in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(11) ASSET IMPAIRMENTS

        During the year, the Company evaluates the carrying value of its individual customer management centers in accordance with SFAS No. 144 to evaluate whether future operating results are sufficient to recover the carrying costs of the long-lived assets. When the operating results of a center have reasonably progressed to a point making it likely that the site will continue to sustain losses in the future, or there is a current expectation that a customer management center will be closed or otherwise disposed of before the end of its previously estimated useful life, the Company selects the center for further review.

        For customer management centers selected for further review, the Company estimates the future estimated cash flows from operating the center over its useful life. Significant judgment is involved in projecting future capacity utilization, pricing, labor costs and the estimated useful life. Additionally, the Company does not test customer management centers that have been operated for less than two years or those centers that have been impaired within the past two years. The Company believes a sufficient time to establish market presence and build a customer base is required for new centers in order to determine recoverability. For recently impaired centers, the Company has written the assets down to fair market value.

        During the second quarter of 2003, the Company determined that two of its customer management centers would not generate sufficient undiscounted cash flows to recover the net book value of its assets. During the second quarter of 2003, management determined to close the Kansas City center upon expiration of the work being performed for the USPS. Accordingly, the projection for that location indicated that an impairment exists. Additionally, the Company determined that an impairment existed for its Mexico City location. As a result, the Company's North American and International

16

Outsourcing segments recorded charges of approximately $4.0 million and $3.0 million, respectively to reduce the net book value of their long-lived assets to net realizable value.

(12) EQUITY INVESTMENT

        The Company had a preferred stock investment in enhansiv holdings, inc. ("EHI"), a company developing a centralized, open architecture, customer management solution. The Company's Chairman and CEO, Kenneth D. Tuchman, along with four outside investors, owned 100% of the common stock of EHI. During the second quarter of 2002, Mr. Tuchman transferred his 55% common stock interest to the Company for no consideration and during the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company purchased the remaining common shares from the outside shareholders for $2.3 million which was recorded as a loss based on a third party appraisal.

        As a preferred stockholder, the Company accounted for its investment in EHI under the equity method of accounting. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, the Company recorded $3.6 million of EHI losses, which are reflected as a separate line item in Other Income (Expense) in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company began consolidating the results of EHI upon receiving Mr. Tuchman's common shares on May 31, 2002.

(13) CONTINGENCIES

        Legal Proceedings.    From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation, most of which is incidental to its business. In the Company's opinion, no litigation to which the Company currently is a party is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

        Sales and Use Taxes.    The Company has received inquiries from several states regarding the applicability of sales or use taxes on the services primarily provided by its Database Marketing and Consulting segment. The Company is working with the inquiring states to determine what liability exists, if any, in each respective state. In addition to the inquiring states, the Company has initiated a self-assessment to determine whether sales or use taxes are applicable in each state in which it does business. Sales and use tax laws are complex and vary by state. The Company has determined that sales or use tax applies in certain states to its products and services of its Database Marketing and Consulting segment. While management cannot quantify the ultimate liability that will be owed, it has recorded approximately $3.3 million of use tax expense during the three months ended June 30, 2003 for what it believes to be the minimum liability that will be owed for services provided since 1996. As the Company progresses in its assessment and dealings with the various states, it will update this estimated liability and record charges to operations, if any, when such amounts become both probable and reasonably estimable. At this time, the Company does not expect the outcome to have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition or cash flows. The outcome may have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations in the period such future charges, if any, are recorded.

        Guarantees.    The Company's Revolver is guaranteed by all of the Company's domestic subsidiaries. The Senior Notes are guaranteed by all of the Company's subsidiaries. A subsidiary operating lease agreement with $2.8 million remaining to be paid to a bank as of June 30, 2003 is guaranteed by another subsidiary.

17

Item 2.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

INTRODUCTION

        This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company has set forth in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 a detailed discussion of risks and uncertainties relating to the Company's business. The projections and statements contained in these forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company's actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. The Company's future results of operations and performance are subject to numerous factors including: economic or political changes affecting the countries in which the Company operates; greater than anticipated competition in the customer care market, causing increased price competition or loss of clients; the reliance on a few major clients; the risks associated with losing one or more significant client relationships; the renewal of client or vendor relationships on favorable terms; the risks associated with the Verizon program (see Client Concentrations); the ability to transition work from higher cost centers to lower cost markets; the Company's ability to develop and successfully manage new technology or Database Marketing and Consulting sales; the Company's ability to collect monies owed from clients per contract terms and conditions in a timely manner; higher than anticipated start-up costs associated with new business opportunities and ventures; the Company's ability to find cost effective locations, obtain favorable lease terms and build or retrofit facilities in a timely and economic manner; lower than anticipated customer management center capacity utilization; consumers' concerns or adverse publicity regarding the products of the Company's clients; the Company's ability to close new business in 2003 and fill excess capacity; execution risks associated with achieving the targeted $40.0 million in annualized cost savings; the possibility of additional asset impairments and restructuring charges; the ability to successfully execute an intercreditor agreement related to the Company's recently amended debt agreements; the ultimate liability associated with the amount of past sales or use tax obligations for its Database Marketing and Consulting and North American Outsourcing segments; changes in workers' compensation and general liability premiums; increases in health care costs; risks associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates; changes in accounting policies and practices pronounced by standard setting bodies; and, new legislation or government regulation that impacts the customer care industry. Readers should review this quarterly report in combination with the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and other documents filed with the SEC, which describe in greater detail these and other important factors that may impact the Company's business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. The Company assumes no obligation to update its forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors affecting such forward-looking statements.

Business Strategy

        Restoring the Company to profitability is the primary focus of the management team for the remainder of 2003 and beyond. Management's success will depend on successful execution of a comprehensive business plan, including the following steps:

•

selling new business to existing customers and absorbing unused capacity in existing domestic and international CMCs;



•

continuing to focus sales efforts on large, complex, multi-center opportunities;

18

•

cutting costs and continued focus on cost controls;



•

increasing the profitability of existing client contracts through more efficient operations;



•

placing new business in and effectively managing operations in domestic and international CMCs; and



•

differentiating the Company's products and services by developing and offering new value added solutions to clients.

Critical Accounting Policies

        The Company has identified the policies below as critical to its business and results of operations. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. The Company's reported results are impacted by the application of the following accounting policies, certain of which require management to make subjective or complex judgments. These judgments involve making estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may significantly impact quarterly or annual results of operations. Specific risks associated with these critical accounting policies are described in the following paragraphs.

        For all of these policies, management cautions that future events rarely develop exactly as expected, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment. The Company believes that its most significant accounting policies require:

•

estimation of future cash flows used to assess the recoverability of long-lived assets, goodwill, deferred tax assets, and establishing estimated liabilities for closing customer management centers; and



•

determination of appropriate allowances associated with accounts receivable.

        Descriptions of these critical accounting policies follow:

        Revenue Recognition.    The revenue recognition policy is significant because revenue is a key component of operating results. The Company carefully evaluates the terms of each contract. The Company recognizes revenue at the time services are performed. In certain circumstances, the Company receives payment in advance of providing service. Accordingly, amounts billed but not earned under these contracts are excluded from revenue and included in customer advances and deferred income.

        Foreign Currency Translation.    A substantial amount of the Company's operations are conducted outside of the United States. The assets and liabilities of the Company's foreign subsidiaries, whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar, are translated at the exchange rates in effect on the reporting date, and income and expenses are translated at the weighted average exchange rate during the period. The net effect of translation gains and losses is not included in determining net income, but is accumulated as a separate component of stockholders' equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in determining net income. Intercompany loans are generally treated as permanently invested as settlement is not planned or anticipated in the foreseeable future. If the Company were to revise its plans for the repayment of intercompany loans, the net effect of the related foreign currency translations would be included in the determination of net income. As a result, the Company's earnings could become more volatile as the intercompany loan balance is approximately $40.6 million.

        It is a significant Company strategy to leverage low cost opportunities afforded by countries outside the United States. Accordingly, in certain situations the Company provides services primarily to U.S. based customers from customer management centers in other countries. During 2003, the Company determined to settle the intercompany receivable and payable balances that result from these

19

arrangements periodically and, accordingly, the transaction gains and losses from fluctuations in exchange rates are included in determining net income (loss). For the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company recorded transaction losses of $2.1 million as Other Expense related to the intercompany receivables/payable balances generated from labor arbitrage activities. In the future, management intends to settle these intercompany balances monthly and, accordingly, expects to mitigate the exposure caused by changes in foreign exchange rates.

        Contract Acquisition Costs.    Amounts paid to or on behalf of clients to obtain long-term contracts are capitalized (if incurred within 12 months of commencement of operations) and amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the contracts as a reduction to revenue commencing with the date of the first revenues from the contract. In certain circumstances, costs may be estimated at the inception of operations and subsequently revised based on actual costs incurred. The Company's accounting policy is to generally limit the amount of initial capitalized costs for a given contract to the lesser of the estimated ongoing future cash flows from the contract or the termination fees the Company would receive in the event of early termination of the contract by the customer. The Company's entitlement to termination fees may, however, be subject to challenge if a customer were to allege that the Company was in breach of contract.

        In connection with obtaining the large North American Outsourcing program discussed in Results of Operations below, the Company recorded contract acquisition costs primarily for assumed severance liabilities. As of June 30, 2003, the unamortized balance was approximately $9.8 million. While management's projections for this program currently show sufficient cash flows to recover the unamortized balance, the profitability of this program must improve from current levels.

        Income Taxes.    The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future income tax consequences of transactions that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. When circumstances warrant, the Company assesses the likelihood that its net deferred tax assets will more likely than not be recovered from future projected taxable income. Management judgment has been used in forecasting future taxable income.

        During the second quarter of 2003, the Company updated its analysis of the recoverability of its deferred tax asset due to a change in facts and circumstances. While the Company had reported net losses during 2002 and 2001, management believed they were primarily due to site closures, restructurings and adjusting assets to their net realizable value, and that operating results were profitable without such charges. Further, management expected 2003 and future operations to return to profitability. During the second quarter of 2003, the Company again incurred a net loss. The net loss was the result of both core operating results along with charges for site closures, restructurings and asset recoverability. These represent a different set of facts and circumstances from year-end and, accordingly, the Company determined that it was appropriate under current circumstances to record a valuation allowance for its deferred tax asset.

        SFAS 109 provides for the weighing of positive and negative evidence in determining whether it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset is recoverable. The Company also prepared a forecast of future taxable income, including domestic and international operating results and the reversal of existing temporary differences between income recognized under generally accepted accounting principles and income for federal income tax reporting purposes. Relevant accounting guidance suggests that a recent history of cumulative losses constitutes significant negative evidence, and that future expectations about taxable income are overshadowed by such recent losses. Accordingly, the expectations of future taxable income would generally be limited to no more than two or three years

20

for generating sufficient income to recover deferred tax assets. Based on the Company's evaluation of positive and negative evidence, along with forecasted taxable income (loss) over the next two to three years, management determined to establish a valuation allowance of $31.9 million.

        Goodwill.    Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level which is the strategic business unit level for the Company. The impairment, if any, is measured based on the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. Fair value can be determined based on discounted cash flows, comparable sales or valuations of other similar businesses. Impairment occurs when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its estimated fair value. The Company's policy is to test goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter unless an indicator of impairment arises prior to the fourth quarter.

        The most significant assumptions used by the Company in this analysis are those made in estimating future cash flows. In estimating future cash flows, the Company generally uses the financial assumptions in its internal forecasting model such as projected capacity utilization, projected changes in the prices the Company charges for its services and projected labor costs. The Company then uses a discount rate it considers appropriate for the country where the business unit is providing services.

        If the assumptions used in performing the impairment test prove insufficient, the fair value of the reporting units may be significantly lower, causing the carrying value to exceed the fair value and indicating an impairment has occurred. During the first quarter of 2002, the Company engaged an outside party to perform a valuation of its reporting units. The valuation concluded that the current value of the goodwill associated with its Latin America reporting unit was $0 and, accordingly, a transitional impairment charge of approximately $11.5 million was recorded to write-off goodwill (see Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). The Company currently has approximately $30.0 million of goodwill recorded on the June 30, 2003 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet related to its North American, Asia Pacific and Newgen reporting units.

        Restructuring Liability.    The Company periodically assesses the profitability and utilization of its customer management centers along with the overall profitability of the Company. As a result, the Company has historically chosen to close under-performing centers and make reductions in force to enhance future profitability. Under the previous accounting guidance, the Company recorded the anticipated charges at the time a plan was approved by management or the Board of Directors and various other criteria. On January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities," which specifies that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred instead of upon commitment to a plan. Additionally, SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," contains a broadened definition of discontinued operations. The Company adopted SFAS No. 144 effective January 1, 2002.

        A significant assumption used in determining the amount of estimated liability for closing customer management centers is the amount of the estimated liability for future lease payments on vacant centers, which management determines based on a third party broker's assessment of the Company's ability to successfully negotiate early termination agreements with landlords and/or the Company's ability to sublease the premises. If management's assumptions regarding early termination and the timing and amounts of sublease payments prove to be inaccurate, the Company may be required to record additional losses, or conversely, future gain, in its consolidated statements of operations. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company reversed $1.2 million of previously recorded restructuring charges in its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations related to truing up estimated restructuring liabilities. As of June 30, 2003, the Company has recorded $5.1 million of estimated restructuring liabilities on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 10 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a rollforward of activity in the restructuring liability reserve.

21

        Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.    During the year, the Company evaluates the carrying value of its individual customer management centers in accordance with SFAS No. 144 to evaluate whether future operating results are sufficient to recover the carrying costs of the long-lived assets. When the operating results of a center have reasonably progressed to a point making it likely that the site will continue to sustain losses in the future, or there is a current expectation that a customer management center will be closed or otherwise disposed of before the end of its previously estimated useful life, the Company selects the center for further review.

        For customer management centers selected for further review, the Company estimates the future estimated cash flows from operating the center over its useful life. Significant judgment is involved in projecting future capacity utilization, pricing, labor costs and the estimated useful life. Additionally, the Company does not test customer management centers that have been operated for less than two years or those centers that have been impaired within the past two years (the "Two Year Rule"). The Company believes a sufficient time to establish market presence and build a customer base is required for new centers in order to determine recoverability. For recently impaired centers, the Company has written the assets down to fair market value. If the assumptions used in performing the impairment test prove insufficient, the fair value estimate of the customer management centers may be significantly lower, thereby causing the carrying value to exceed fair value and indicating an impairment has occurred.

        During the second quarter of 2003, the Company determined that two of its customer management centers would not generate sufficient undiscounted cash flows to recover the net book value of its assets. During the second quarter of 2003, management determined to close the Kansas City center upon expiration of the work being performed for the USPS. Accordingly, the projection for that location indicated that an impairment exists. Additionally, the Company determined that an impairment existed for its Mexico City location. As a result, the Company's North American and International Outsourcing segments recorded charges of approximately $4.0 million and $3.0 million, respectively to reduce the net book value of their long-lived assets to net realizable value.

        To provide a sensitivity analysis of the impairment that could arise were the projection scenarios (that had annual revenue growth rates of 0% to 35% based on management expectations and available capacity) not to prove accurate, assuming revenues were 10% less than projected (holding the margin constant), the impairment loss would have been approximately $11.9 million greater.

        The following table summarizes the sensitivity analysis performed by the Company during the second quarter of 2003 (dollars in thousands):

        Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.    The Company has established an allowance for doubtful accounts to reserve for uncollectible accounts receivable. Each quarter the Company reviews its receivables on an account by account basis and assigns a probability of collection. Management judgment is used in assigning a probability of collection. Factors considered in making this judgment are the age of the identified receivable, client financial wherewithal, previous client history and any recent communications with the client.

22

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Operating Review

        The following tables are presented to facilitate Management's Discussion and Analysis (dollars in thousands):