| SEC Info | Home | Search | My Interests | Help | Sign In | Please Sign In | ||||||||||||||||||||
As Of Filer Filing As/For/On Docs:Pgs Issuer Agent 5/03/05 Signet Group PLC 20-F 1/29/05 8:375 1021231
Document/Exhibit Description Pages Size 1: 20-F Annual Report of a Foreign Private Issuer HTML 2,032K 2: EX-4 Instrument Defining the Rights of Security Holders HTML 683K 3: EX-4 Instrument Defining the Rights of Security Holders HTML 94K 4: EX-12 Statement re: Computation of Ratios HTML 14K 5: EX-12 Statement re: Computation of Ratios HTML 14K 6: EX-13 Annual or Quarterly Report to Security Holders HTML 9K 7: EX-13 Annual or Quarterly Report to Security Holders HTML 9K 8: EX-14 Material Foreign Patent HTML 8K
| 20-F | 1st "Page" of 144 | TOC | Top | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 1st |
|---|
|
SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
| Registration statement pursuant to Section 12(b) or (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
| Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
| For the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005 | |
| Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from ________ to ________.
Commission file number 0-16945
SIGNET GROUP plc
(Exact name of Registrant as specified
in its charter)
ENGLAND
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Zenith House
The Hyde
London NW9 6EW
England
(Address of principal executive offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| Ordinary Shares, nominal value £0.005 each | New York Stock Exchange* |
| American Depositary Shares, | New York Stock Exchange |
| each representing 10 ordinary shares |
| * | Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of the ADSs pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Securities for which there is a
reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:
| Ordinary Shares of 0.5 pence each | 1,735,615,152 |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
No
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
Item
17
Item
18
Explanatory Note
This document comprises the annual report on Form 20-F and the annual report to shareholders for the year ended 29 January 2005 of Signet Group plc (the “2004/05 Form 20-F”). Reference is made to the Cross Reference to Form 20-F table beginning on page 137 hereof (the “Cross Reference to Form 20-F Table”). Only (i) the information in this document that is referenced in the Cross Reference to Form 20-F Table, (ii) the cautionary statement concerning forward-looking statements on page 1 and (iii) the Exhibits, shall be deemed to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for any purpose, including incorporation by reference into the Registration Statements on Form S-8 of Signet Group plc (No. 333-12304, 333-9634, 333-8764 and 033-42119), and any other documents, including documents filed by Signet Group plc pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which purport to incorporate by reference the 2004/05 Form 20-F. Any information herein which is not referenced in the Cross Reference to Form 20-F Table, or the Exhibits themselves, shall not be deemed to be so incorporated by reference.
| 20-F | 2nd "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 2nd |
|---|

| 2004/05 | |||
Group highlights |
| Reported | At constant | |||||
| basis | exchange rates(1)(2) | |||||
| Like for like sales: | up 5.0% | |||||
| Sales: | £1,614.4m | up 0.6%(2) | up 7.8% | |||
| Operating profit: | £218.9m | up 4.1%(2) | up 11.3% | |||
| Profit before tax: | £210.3m | up 5.3%(2) | up 12.1% | |||
| Earnings per share(3): | 8.2p | up 9.3%(2) | up 15.5% | |||
| Dividend per share: | 3.0p | up 20.0% | ||||
| Return on capital employed(3) | 26.5% | up from 25.9%(2) | ||||
| Gearing(3) | 11.3% | down from11.8%(2) | ||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| (1) | See page 29 for reconciliation to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) figures. | ||
| (2) | 2000/01 to 2003/04 restated for the implementation in 2004/05 of the amendment to FRS 5, ‘Application Note G – Revenue Recognition’. | ||
| (3) | Earnings per share, return on capital employed and gearing are defined on page 130. | ||
| (4) | 53 week year. | ||
| 20-F | 3rd "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 3rd |
|---|
| Annual Report & Accounts | ||
| Year ended 29 January 2005 |
Signet Group plc is an English public limited company, whose shares are listed on the London Stock Exchange (under the symbol “SIG”) and whose American Depositary Shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (under the symbol “SIG”). |
This
Annual Report contains translations of certain pound sterling amounts
into US dollars at a rate of $1.89 = £1, which was the Noon Buying
Rate in New York City for cable transfers in pounds sterling as certified
for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “Noon
Buying Rate”) on 29 January 2005. These translations should not
be construed as representations that the pound sterling amounts actually
represent such US dollar amounts or could be converted into US dollars
at the rate indicated. On 6 April 2005 the Noon Buying Rate was $1.88
= £1. Cautionary statement regarding forward-looking statements |
|||
This document comprises the Annual Report & Accounts of the Group in accordance with United Kingdom requirements. |
||||
In
this Annual Report, “2000/01”, “2001/02”, “2002/03”, “2003/04”, “2004/05” and “2005/06”,
refer to, as appropriate, the 52 weeks ended 27 January 2001, the 53
weeks ended 2 February 2002, the 52 weeks ended 1 February 2003, the
52 weeks ended 31 January 2004, the 52 weeks ended 29 January
2005 and the 52 weeks ending |
The Company desires to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to the forward-looking statements about its financial performance and objectives in this Annual Report. Readers are referred to “Risk and other factors” on pages 35 to 40. |
|||
| Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 | 1 |
| 20-F | 4th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 4th |
|---|
Chairman’s statement
Group results
In the year to 29 January
2005 the Group further extended its growth record. On a reported basis profit
before tax rose by 5.3% to £210.3 million (2003/04: £199.8 million
restated, see note 17) reflecting an underlying increase of 12.1% at constant
exchange rates. Like for like sales advanced by 5.0%. Total sales rose by
7.8% at constant exchange rates: reported sales were broadly unchanged at
£1,614.4 million (2003/04: £1,604.9 million restated). The tax
rate fell to 32.9% from 35.1%. Earnings per share were 8.2p (2003/04: 7.5p
restated), up by 9.3% on a reported basis and 15.5% at constant exchange rates.
These results reflect the continuing successful implementation of the Group’s strategies on both sides of the Atlantic. However the full extent of the Group’s progress has not been reflected in the reported results due to further weakening of the average US dollar exchange rate from $1.68/£1 to $1.86/£1. This had a significant adverse impact on the translation of the US division’s sales and operating profit into sterling, thereby affecting Group profit before tax by some £12 million. The results also included a restructuring charge in the UK of £1.7 million.
The US division had a very strong start to 2004/05 with an excellent performance during the Valentine’s Day period. Although the retail environment became less predictable as the year progressed, the business had a strong fourth quarter with like for like sales up by 4.7%. For the year as a whole the division again out-performed its main competition and gained further market share. 2004 saw the Group’s nationwide Kay chain become the largest speciality retail jewellery brand by sales in the US.
The UK division also had a particularly strong first quarter but faced a softening trend in the trading environment during the rest of the year. Annual like for like sales increased by 3.0%; a good performance in an increasingly difficult marketplace. The Christmas period proved to be particularly challenging and both H.Samuel and Ernest Jones did well to out-perform the general retail market.
The Group continued to utilise its cash flow and strong balance sheet to invest in the growth of the business. £159.1 million was invested in fixed and working capital during the year. There was an acceleration in new store space growth in the US and a major store refurbishment programme in the UK. Gearing (net debt to shareholders’ funds) at 29 January 2005 was 11.3% (31 January 2004: 11.8% restated).
Accounting standards developments
A period of significant and rapid change in accounting is currently taking place with UK Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (“GAAP”) being replaced by International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), and both converging with US GAAP. The process this year has resulted in a restatement relating to the revenue recognition of extended service agreements in the US (see note 17, page 85) and the replacement in 2005/06 of UK GAAP by IFRS as explained in more detail in the Financial review (page 33).
Dividend
The Board is pleased
to recommend a 21.5% increase in the final dividend to 2.625p per share (2003/04:
2.160p), the total for the year being 3.000p per share (2003/04: 2.501p).
The dividend cover is 2.7 times (2003/04: 3.0 times restated). The Board will
continue to review regularly its distribution policy taking into account earnings,
cash flow, gearing and the needs of the business. See note 8 regarding dividends
to US holders of ordinary shares and ADSs.
People
I would like to thank
our staff and management for their invaluable contribution to the continued
success of the Group.
Robert Walker joined the Board as a non-executive director in November 2004. I am confident that his broad experience of international business will enable him to make a significant contribution to the Group.
Rob Anderson, Chief Executive of Signet’s UK division, joined the Board as an executive director in April 2005 and I am sure will make a valuable contribution at Group level.
I have also recently announced my intention to retire from the Board no later than at the Company’s annual general meeting in June 2006.
Current trading
In the year to date
Group like for like sales growth has been in low single digits after taking
account of the change in the timing of Easter. This reflects a US like for
like increase a little ahead of the fourth quarter last year partly offset
by negative mid single digit like for like sales in the UK following a marked
deterioration in the general trading environment. Both businesses were up
against particularly strong prior year comparatives.

James McAdam
Chairman
6 April 2005
| 2 | Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 |
| 20-F | 5th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 5th |
|---|
Group Chief Executive’s review
Introduction
Group operating profit
rose to £218.9 million from £210.2 million (restated), an increase
of 11.3% at constant exchange rates or 4.1% on a reported basis. The operating
margin increased to 13.6% (2003/04: 13.1% restated), and the return on capital
employed (“ROCE”) was 26.5% (2003/04: 25.9% restated).
The Group’s medium term objectives are to set leading performance standards in its sector of the jewellery market on both sides of the Atlantic, to increase new store space in the US and store productivity in the UK, and to be broadly cash flow neutral after funding the needs of the business and dividend payments.
US division
In 2004/05 the business
continued to build on its competitive strengths. It again out-performed its
main competition and gained further market share. Operating profit rose by
17.1% at constant exchange rates and by 5.7% on a reported basis to £147.3
million (2003/04: £139.3 million restated). The five year annual compound
growth was 12.2% at constant exchange rates.
Like for like sales rose by 5.9% and total dollar sales by 10.3%. The mall stores reported solid growth and Jared, the off-mall destination concept, performed particularly strongly. Over the last five years the US division’s like for like sales have grown at an annual compound rate of 4.5% and total dollar sales by 11.0%. During the same period, the US division’s share of the speciality jewellery market has increased from 5.1% to 7.2%.
New store space rose by 8% during 2004/05 further leveraging both central overhead costs and marketing expenditure. In the last five years new store selling space has increased by some 60%, with the number of Kay stores up by over a third to 742. Over the same period the number of Jared stores has more than tripled to 93.
Growth in new store space and further development of the division’s competitive strengths in the critical areas of merchandising, store operations and marketing have contributed significantly to the out-performance of the business and remain key elements of future strategy. Given the continuing consolidation in the speciality jewellery sector, there should be opportunities to gain further market share both organically and, if appropriate, by acquisition. The US division is now targeting organic space growth of 7% - 9% in future years (previously 6% - 8%).
UK division
Against the background
of an increasingly difficult trading environment UK operating profit advanced
by 2.1% to £78.2 million (2003/04: £76.6 million), the compound
five year annual growth rate being 15.8%. There was a restructuring charge
of £1.7 million reflecting the relocation and consolidation of central
administration functions to enhance efficiency that should generate future
cost savings of about £0.6 million per annum. Like for like sales rose
by 3.0%, the compound annual growth rate during the last five years being
6.3%. The business continues to be strongly cash generative and enjoyed a
ROCE of over 40% in 2004/05.
The drive to increase diamond sales as a proportion of total sales showed further success and remains central to the future strategy of both H.Samuel and Ernest Jones. Diamonds now account for 28% of the division’s product mix compared with 22% five years ago. The objective is to leverage both chains’ strong market positions by increasing average transaction values which have risen by 42% in H.Samuel and by 29% in Ernest Jones in the last five years.
Central to selling diamonds is the interaction between the customer and the salesperson. The roll-out of the new store format, which facilitates such interaction, was implemented as part of the store refurbishment cycle in 2004/05. The focus on customer service was also evident in the priority given to staff training. The significant changes taking place in the UK business are being supported by increased marketing expenditure. In implementing these initiatives the UK business is able to draw on the US division’s best practices.
US (68% of Group
sales)
Details of the US division’s
performance are set out below:
| Change | |||||||||||
| At constant | Like | ||||||||||
| exchange | for like | ||||||||||
| 2004/05 | 2003/04 | (1) | Reported | rates | (2) | change | |||||
| £m | £m | % | % | % | |||||||
| Sales | 1,100.0 | 1,103.9 | –0.4 | +10.3 | +5.9 | ||||||
| Operating profit | 147.3 | 139.3 | +5.7 | +17.1 | |||||||
| Operating margin | 13.4 | % | 12.6 | % | |||||||
| ROCE | 22.4 | % | 21.3 | % | |||||||
| (1) | Restated for amendment to FRS 5, ‘Application Note G – Revenue Recognition’. | |
| (2) | See page 29 for reconciliation. |
The operating margin improved on last year, reflecting leverage of like for like sales growth partly offset by the adverse impact of immature store space. Gross margin was maintained at last year’s level, as a range of supply chain initiatives and pricing actions counter-balanced commodity cost increases. Commodity costs continue to rise and further initiatives are being implemented in
| Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 | 3 |
| 20-F | 6th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 6th |
|---|
Group Chief Executive’s review (continued)
the current year to help again offset the impact. The bad debt charge was towards the bottom of the range of the last five years at 2.9% of total sales (2003/04: 2.8%). The proportion of sales through the in-house credit card was 50.1% (2003/04: 49.3%).
In the jewellery sector superior customer service and product knowledge are important competitive advantages readily identified by the consumer, and the division now has at least one certified diamontologist in every store. Also during 2004/05 all sales staff were coached using the “Ultimate Diamond Presentation” training course. Procedures for recruitment were strengthened and staff retention was also improved. The multi-year initiative to enhance store systems saw the introduction of improved repair and special order services.
In mall stores the upper end of the diamond selection was enhanced and the Leo Diamond range was successfully expanded. The gold category was reinvigorated by the development of fashion gold merchandise in conjunction with the World Gold Council. In Jared sales of loose diamonds, the Leo Diamond range, luxury watches such as Rolex, Tag Heuer and Raymond Weil all performed well. Cartier watches will be tested in certain Jared stores in 2005/06. Average unit selling prices in both the mall stores and Jared increased by some 10% reflecting not only consumer movement to higher value merchandise such as the Leo Diamond range, but also the changes in retail prices implemented during the year. The division’s competitive advantage obtained by sourcing loose stones for about 55% of diamond merchandise proved to be particularly beneficial during a period of higher rough diamond costs.
Strong marketing programmes again contributed to the sales growth out-performance. Kay television advertising impressions were increased by 11% over the Christmas period and national radio advertising was successfully introduced. Some 90% of Jared stores benefited from television advertising compared with around 75% in the prior year. The annual gross marketing spend amounted to 6.6% of sales (2003/04: 6.5%) and dollar marketing expenditure has doubled over the last five years.
Kay, with a turnover of $1,155.5 million, became the number one speciality jewellery brand by sales during 2004/05 having consistently out-performed its major competitors. Over the last five years the number of Kay stores has increased by almost 200 to a total of 742 and average sales per store have grown to $1.584 million from $1.355 million. Brand name recognition has risen very significantly since the introduction of the “Every kiss begins with Kay” advertising campaign in 2000/01. It is planned to increase Kay’s representation in malls by between 20 and 30 new stores in 2005/06. In addition to mall locations, stores under
the Kay brand are currently being opened in lifestyle and power strip centres. Ten such stores were opened in 2004/05 and a similar number are planned in 2005/06. In the current year it is anticipated that up to four stores will be trialled in metropolitan areas.
Currently 321 mall stores trade under strong regional brand names. Sales in the year were over $450 million, reflecting average sales per store of $1.533 million. The regional stores could provide the potential to develop a second mall brand of sufficient size to justify the cost of national television advertising. This would require about 550 stores which could be achieved in the medium term by a mixture of store openings and acquisitions. In 2005/06 it is planned that 20-30 new stores will be opened under the regional brand names.
Jared now has sales of just over $400 million and a portfolio of 93 stores, equivalent in space terms to about 400 mall stores. The Jared concept is the primary vehicle for US space growth and in 2004/05 a further 14 stores were opened. The chain is still relatively immature with some 70% of stores not yet having traded for five full years. Excluding the three prototype stores the 25 Jared stores that have reached maturity achieved, in aggregate, the target level of sales and store contribution (set at the time of investment) in their fifth year of trading. During 2005/06 it is intended to increase the number of Jared openings to 15 - 20 per annum, from the 12 - 15 per annum opened in the last six years.
The change in store numbers by chain is shown in the following table:
| Total | Kay | Regional | Jared | ||||||
| 31 January 2004 | 1,103 | 717 | 307 | 79 | |||||
| Store openings | 68 | 34 | 20 | 14 | |||||
| Store closures | (15 | ) | (9 | ) | (6 | ) | – | ||
| 29 January 2005 | 1,156 | 742 | 321 | 93 | |||||
In 2004/05 total fixed and working capital investment in the US business was $228.3 million (2003/04: $138.3 million) and new store space increased by a net 8% as planned.
Recent investment in the store portfolio is set out below:
| Number of stores | 2004/05 | 2003/04 | 2002/03 | 2001/02 | 2000/01 | ||||||
| Store refurbishment | |||||||||||
| and relocations | 76 | 61 | 71 | 91 | 99 | ||||||
| New mall stores | 44 | 47 | 36 | 41 | 40 | ||||||
| New off-mall Kay stores | 10 | 10 | – | – | – | ||||||
| New Jared stores | 14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 15 | ||||||
| Store fixed capital | |||||||||||
| investment | $53m | $42m | $38m | $51m | $60m | ||||||
| Store total investment(1) | $140m | $98m | $92m | $96m | $107m | ||||||
| (1) Fixed and working capital investment in new space and refurbishments/relocations. | |||||||||||
| 4 | Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 |
| 20-F | 7th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 7th |
|---|
In 2005/06 net new store space growth of 7% - 9% is planned reflecting the increased rate of Jared store openings, an acceleration in the expansion of stores under regional brand names, the continued growth of Kay stores and the closure of some 15 mall stores. Total US fixed capital expenditure is expected to be some $90-$100 million in 2005/06 (2004/05: $77.6 million), including the refurbishment or relocation of approximately 90 stores. Total store investment, including working capital, is planned to be some $155 million in 2005/06.
UK (32% of Group sales)
Details of the UK division’s
performance are set out below:
| Like | |||||||||
| for like | |||||||||
| 2004/05 | 2003/04 | Change | change | ||||||
| £m | £m | % | % | ||||||
| Sales | |||||||||
| H.Samuel | 285.5 | 285.8 | –0.1 | +1.9 | |||||
| Ernest Jones | 223.4 | 209.4 | +6.7 | +4.5 | |||||
| Other | 5.5 | 5.8 | |||||||
| Total | 514.4 | 501.0 | +2.7 | +3.0 | |||||
| Operating profit | 78.2 | (1) | 76.6 | +2.1 | |||||
| Operating margin | 15.2 | %(1) | 15.3 | % | |||||
| ROCE | 44.7 | % | 47.1 | % | |||||
| (1) After charging a restructuring expense of £1.7 million. | |||||||||
The division’s gross margin benefited from the effect of the lower dollar exchange rate on dollar denominated commodity costs. The operating margin at 15.2% was little changed after absorbing a restructuring charge of £1.7 million. Like for like sales were up by 1.9% in H.Samuel, while total sales were similar to last year due to nine net store closures and a significant increase in the number of temporary closures for refurbishment. H.Samuel’s sales per store increased to £0.723 million (2003/04: £0.707 million). Ernest Jones had another strong performance with like for like sales up by 4.5%, total sales increasing by 6.7% and sales per store reaching £1.150 million (2003/04: £1.101 million).
Diamond jewellery assortments were enhanced during the year and continued to perform strongly, accounting for 20% of sales in H.Samuel and 38% in Ernest Jones. The Leo Diamond range was expanded in Ernest Jones and the Forever Diamond selection is now in all H.Samuel stores. White metal jewellery also proved popular. In H.Samuel the fashion watch range was increased whilst the gift and collectibles selection continued to be rationalised. The average selling price in H.Samuel was £37 (2003/04: £35) and in Ernest Jones £141 (2003/04: £139).
The focus on diamonds requires a higher level of customer service and greater product knowledge by the store staff. New training practices continued to be enhanced in 2004/05 involving a weekly programme of centrally prepared material, regular feedback from supervisors and emphasis on measurable
outcomes. Particular benefit from improved staff training was gained in the diamond category. During the year a new incentive scheme, which drew on the Group’s US experience, was tested and will be expanded further in 2005/06.
Catalogues remain the main marketing tool, with design and distribution being strengthened during the period. The television advertising test was extended during Christmas 2004 with H.Samuel national coverage increasing to about 65% from around 40% in the prior year. Ernest Jones’ coverage was doubled to some 60%. It is planned to continue the trial in 2005/06. Ernest Jones successfully launched a customer relationship marketing programme during 2004/05. Over the last five years marketing expenditure has increased at an annual compound rate of 20% and represented 3.0% of sales in 2004/05 (2003/04: 2.5%).
In 2004/05 total fixed and working capital investment in the UK business was £36.3 million (2003/04: £27.5 million), a significant increase reflecting the roll-out of the new store format. At the year end, 142 stores, mostly H.Samuel, traded in the new format, accounting for about 30% of the UK division’s sales over the Christmas period. There were seven Ernest Jones and two H.Samuel new store openings. 11 H.Samuel stores were closed. At the year end there were 602 stores (398 H.Samuel and 204 Ernest Jones).
Recent investment in the store portfolio is set out below:
| Number of stores | 2004/05 | 2003/04 | 2002/03 | 2001/02 | 2000/01 | ||||||
| Store refurbishments | |||||||||||
| and relocations | 81 | 32 | 42 | 93 | 24 | ||||||
| New H.Samuel stores | 2 | – | 4 | 10 | 9 | ||||||
| New Ernest Jones stores | 7 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 3 | ||||||
| Store fixed capital | |||||||||||
| investment | £23m | £13m | £14m | £15m | £6m | ||||||
A similar pattern of store investment is planned for 2005/06 with total capital expenditure expected to be some £30-£35 million in 2005/06 (2004/05: £28.8 million). This reflects the continued roll-out of the new store format with about 90 stores planned to be refurbished or relocated during 2005/06, again predominantly H.Samuel.

Terry Burman
Group Chief Executive
6 April 2005
| Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 | 5 |
| 20-F | 8th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 8th |
|---|
Five year financial summary
| 2004/05 | 2004/05 | (1) | 2003/04 | 2002/03 | 2001/02 | 2000/01 | ||||||
| as restated | (2) | as restated | (2) | as restated | (2)(3) | as restated | (2) | |||||
| £m | $m | £m | £m | £m | £m | |||||||
| Sales | 1,614.4 | 3,051.2 | 1,604.9 | 1,593.6 | 1,562.4 | 1,373.3 | ||||||
| Operating profit | 218.9 | 413.7 | 210.2 | 199.9 | 183.4 | 163.8 | ||||||
| Net interest payable | (8.6 | ) | (16.3 | ) | (10.4 | ) | (14.0 | ) | (15.0 | ) | (12.7 | ) |
| Profit before tax | 210.3 | 397.4 | 199.8 | 185.9 | 168.4 | 151.1 | ||||||
| Taxation | (69.1 | ) | (130.5 | ) | (70.2 | ) | (65.7 | ) | (57.9 | ) | (48.4 | ) |
| Profit for the period | 141.2 | 266.9 | 129.6 | 120.2 | 110.5 | 102.7 | ||||||
| Earnings per share(4) | 8.2p | $0.15 | 7.5p | 7.0p | 6.5p | 6.1p | ||||||
| Dividend per share (£) | 3.000p | 2.501p | 2.110p | 1.789p | 1.625p | |||||||
| Dividend per share ($) | $0.0558 | $0.0420 | $0.0323 | $0.0258 | $0.0242 | |||||||
| Capital expenditure | 70.5 | 133.2 | 50.9 | 49.5 | 59.8 | 56.2 | ||||||
| Investment in fixed and working capital | 159.1 | 300.7 | 97.7 | 105.0 | 113.2 | 137.2 | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortisation | 42.3 | 79.9 | 40.4 | 37.8 | 34.7 | 30.6 | ||||||
| Net debt | 83.5 | 157.8 | 79.9 | 140.1 | 201.7 | 229.1 | ||||||
| Shareholders’ funds | 739.1 | 1,396.9 | 674.9 | 627.6 | 634.4 | 544.5 | ||||||
| Shares in issue (million) | 1,735.6 | 1,726.2 | 1,713.8 | 1,706.0 | 1,685.7 | |||||||
| Gearing(4) | 11.3% | 11.8% | 22.3% | 31.8% | 42.1% | |||||||
| Return on capital employed(4) | 26.5% | 25.9% | 25.0% | 23.7% | 25.8% | |||||||
| Store numbers (at end of period): | ||||||||||||
| US | 1,156 | 1,103 | 1,050 | 1,025 | 999 | |||||||
| UK | 602 | 604 | 610 | 606 | 605 | |||||||
| Percentage increase in like for like sales: | ||||||||||||
| US | 6% | 5% | 5% | 1% | 6% | |||||||
| UK | 3% | 6% | 5% | 9% | 9% | |||||||
| Average sales per store (£’000s)(5): | ||||||||||||
| US | 976 | 1,028 | 1,074 | 1,095 | 1,078 | |||||||
| UK | 866 | 824 | 747 | 735 | 665 | |||||||
| Number of employees | ||||||||||||
| (full-time equivalents) | 15,145 | 14,502 | 14,160 | 13,525 | 12,520 | |||||||
| (1) | Amounts in pounds sterling are translated into US dollars solely for the convenience of the reader, at a rate of £1.00 to $1.89, the Noon Buying Rate on 28 January 2005. |
| (2) | Restated for the implementation in 2004/05 of the amendment to FRS 5, ‘Application Note G – Revenue Recognition’. The adoption of the standard resulted in a prior year adjustment (see note 17 on page 85). |
| (3) | 53 week year. The impact of the additional week on sales was £22.4 million, operating profit £4.0 million, net interest payable £0.4 million and profit before tax £3.6 million. |
| (4) | Earnings per share, gearing and return on capital employed are defined on page 130. |
| (5) | Including only stores operated for the full financial period. |
The financial data included in the Five year financial summary above has been derived, in part, from the consolidated accounts for such periods included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The financial data should be read in conjunction with the accounts, including the notes thereto, and the Financial review included on pages 24 to 34.
Further selected financial data is shown on pages 127 and 128. The accounts of the Group have been prepared in accordance with UK GAAP, which differ in certain respects from US GAAP. See pages 103 to 114 for information on the material differences between UK GAAP and US GAAP that affect the Group’s profit and shareholders’ funds.
| 6 | Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 |
| 20-F | 9th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 9th |
|---|
US operating review


Overview
Signet’s US division
is the second largest speciality retail jeweller in the United States with an
approximate market share of 7.2% of the speciality jewellery market. Total US
sales in the
year to 29 January
2005 were $2,046 million (2003/04: $1,855 million restated). At the year end
the division had 1,156 stores comprising 1,043 mall jewellery stores as well
as 93 off-mall category killer destination superstores (equivalent in space terms
to about 400 mall stores) and 20 stores being trialled in off-mall shopping centres.
The division’s mall stores target the middle market while the off-mall superstores
target the upper middle market. Its mall stores trade nationwide as Kay Jewelers
(“Kay”), and regionally under a number of well established and recognised
names. Kay Jewelers is the largest speciality retail jewellery brand in the US
by sales. The destination superstores trade as Jared The Galleria Of Jewelry
(“Jared”), and are the nation’s
largest and fastest growing chain of off-mall category killer destination jewellery
stores. A category
killer store offers a wider selection of merchandise at highly competitive prices.
Over the longer term the division’s aim is to gain further profitable market share through like for like sales growth, and by focusing on proven competitive strengths. It aims also to increase US new store space by about 7% – 9% per annum, with Jared accounting for the majority of the planned space growth.
Competitive advantages
Management attributes the
division’s success in the US speciality retail jewellery market to a range
of competitive advantages in store operations, real estate, merchandising and
marketing. These advantages are reflected in the above average sales per store
and operating profit margin. The principal competitive advantages are summarised
below, and all are explained in greater detail on pages 9 to 15.
• Store operations and personnel
The sales associate’s
ability to communicate and explain the value and quality of the merchandise
plays a significant part in a retail jewellery purchase. Therefore, the US
division has developed specialised training for its retail personnel, and its
size provides leverage of training resources and
systems. The division now has at least one certified diamontologist in each of its stores.
• Real estate
Strict criteria are followed when evaluating real estate investment, and management believes that the quality of the store portfolio is superior to that of its competitors. The trading record and
the strength of the Group balance sheet make Signet an attractive tenant.
• Merchandising
Management believes that
in comparison to its competitors Signet has greater experience and capacity to
direct source diamonds (i.e. to purchase loose polished diamonds from diamond
cutters and supply them to contract manufacturers who produce finished merchandise).
This sourcing strategy allows the Group to provide superior value and quality
to the consumer. Diamond jewellery accounts for approximately 70% of total annual
merchandise
sales. The division’s sophisticated merchandising systems test, track, forecast
and respond to consumer preferences and provide competitive advantage by helping
to ensure high in-stock positions of key merchandise assortments and faster moving
items.
• Marketing
Kay is one of a very limited number of US speciality retail jewellery brands with a presence large enough to justify national television advertising, which is the most cost effective way to
attract customers, enter new markets and increase brand recognition.
It is anticipated that Jared will have sufficient scale to use national television advertising for Christmas 2006.
Initiatives in 2004/05
Specific initiatives taken
during 2004/05 to strengthen the Group’s competitive position included:
| Store operations and personnel | |
| • | strengthened field recruitment organisation |
| • | enhanced diamond selling skills of store personnel |
| • | developed systems for greater operational efficiency in special orders and repairs |
| Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 | 7 |
| 20-F | 10th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 10th |
|---|
US operating review (continued)
| Real estate | |
| • | increased number of Jared openings and testing of new locations |
| • | expanded testing of Kay off-mall store format by opening ten additional stores |
| Merchandising | |
| • | improved supply chain efficiency and pricing changes |
| • | further developed the diamond ranges, including expansion of the Leo Diamond, diamond right-hand rings and solitaire diamonds |
| • | introduced new programmes to reinvigorate the gold category |
| • | further expanded the Jared luxury watch range |
| Marketing | |
| • | further increased national TV advertising for Kay |
| • | expansion of Jared TV advertising programme |
Marketplace
Total US jewellery sales,
including watches and fashion jewellery, are estimated by the US Department
of Commerce to have been $57 billion in 2004 (2003: $54 billion) and are believed
to account for about 50% of worldwide diamond jewellery sales according to Rapaport
Research. In the US market diamond jewellery sales account for just over 50%
of total jewellery sales. The US jewellery market has grown at a compound annual
growth rate of 5.5% over the last 20 years. In the last ten years the growth
in diamond jewellery sales has been more than twice that of the total jewellery
market. In 2004 the total jewellery market grew by about 6.9%. Signet has an
approximate 3.6% share of the total US jewellery market. Speciality retailers
accounted for about 50% of the total jewellery market over the last ten years
and the US division has an approximate 7.2% market share of the speciality sector.
Jewellery sector sales have, over the longer term, grown faster than retail sales (source: US Department of Commerce and US Census Bureau) and the rate of growth accelerates and slows in line with retail sales in general (see graph below). Management believes that a major contributor to the relationship with other retail categories is that the majority of jewellery sales are made in the middle mass market for bridal related or annual gift giving events. Retail jewellery sales have risen at a compound annual growth rate of 4.9% from 1997 to 2004 (see graph below), outperforming other comparable sectors in the more buoyant late 1990’s, and over the last four more challenging years performing in line with the general retail sector. Over the same period
Signet’s total US dollar sales rose (excluding the acquisition of Marks & Morgan) at a compound annual growth rate of 11.6%.
Management believes that the longer term outlook for jewellery sales is encouraging given the growth in disposable incomes and the increasing number of women in the work force.
The US division competes on the basis of the quality of its personalised customer service, merchandise selection, availability, quality and value. Brand recognition, trust and store locations are also competitive advantages as is the ability to offer private label credit card programmes to customers. The US division holds no material patents, licenses, franchises or concessions but has a range of trading agreements with suppliers, the most important being in regard of the Leo Diamond. The established trademarks and trade names of the division are essential to maintaining its competitive position in the retail jewellery industry.
The US retail jewellery industry is very competitive and highly fragmented. The broader total US retail jewellery market includes formats such as department stores, discount outlets, television home shopping, internet shopping, other general merchandise stores, apparel stores and accessory stores. The largest jewellery
| 8 | Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 |
| 20-F | 11th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 11th |
|---|
retailer is believed to be Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., which includes a wide assortment of costume jewellery. Management believes that the business also competes with non-jewellery retailers for consumers’ discretionary spending.
The US division’s largest speciality jewellery competitor is Zale Corporation, which has a speciality market share of about 7.5%. Competition is also encountered from a limited number of large regional retail jewellery chains, and smaller regional chains and independent retail jewellery stores (those operating fewer than 100 stores), which account for over 75% of the speciality market. In 2003 the Jewelers Board of Trade estimated that there were 24,888 speciality jewellery stores in the US, compared to 27,156 in 1998, a decrease of 2,268 stores. The number of stores operated by the five largest speciality jewellery retailers increased by about 900 over the same period and reflects the continuing consolidation taking place in the sector. Management believes that the five largest speciality jewellery retailers have increased their market share from about 15% to about 22% of speciality jewellery sales over the last five years. This trend provides significant opportunity for those businesses with competitive strengths in the sector, and it is believed that Signet is well positioned to gain further market share.
Store operations
and personnel
A retail jewellery sale
normally requires face-to-face interaction between the customer and the sales
associate, during which the items being considered for purchase are removed
from the display cases and presented one at a time while their respective qualities
are explained to the customer. Consumer surveys indicate that a key factor in
the retail purchase of jewellery is the customer’s confidence in the sales
associate.
Providing knowledgeable and responsive customer service is a priority, and is regarded by management as a key point of differentiation. It is believed that highly trained store sales staff with the necessary product knowledge to communicate the competitive value of the merchandise are critical to the success of the business. The US division’s substantial training and incentive programmes for all levels of store staff are designed to play an important role in recruiting, educating and retaining qualified store staff. The preferred practice is to promote managers of all levels from within the organisation in order to maintain continuity and familiarity with the division’s practice.
Retail sales personnel are encouraged to become certified diamontologists by graduating from a comprehensive diamond correspondence course provided by the Diamond Council of
America. Over 50% of full time sales staff who have completed their probationary period are certified diamontologists or are training to become certified. Employees often continue their professional development through completion of correspondence courses on gemstones. For Christmas 2004 there was at least one certified diamontologist in each store. In addition, during 2004/05, a major four-month training programme to improve the knowledge and selling skills of sales personnel called “The Ultimate Diamond Presentation” was implemented across all stores ahead of the important fourth quarter.
All store personnel are required to meet daily performance standards and commit to goals. After completion of basic training, sales staff are paid a commission based on their individual sales performance and on meeting monthly store sales targets. Sales contests and incentive programmes also reward the achievement of specific goals with travel or additional cash awards. In addition to sales based incentives, bonuses are paid to store managers and district managers based on the achievement of key performance objectives. In 2004/05 approximately 23% (2003/04: 23%) of store personnel remuneration was commission and incentive-based.
Each store is led by a store manager who is responsible for various store level operations including overall store sales and branch level variable costs; certain personnel matters such as recruitment and training; and customer service. Administrative matters, including purchasing, merchandising, payroll, preparation of training materials, credit operations and divisional operating procedures are consolidated at divisional level. This allows the store manager to focus on those tasks that can be best executed at the store level while enabling the business to benefit from economies of scale in administrative matters and to help ensure consistency of execution across all the stores.
Staff recruitment is primarily the responsibility of store and district managers. In 2004/05 the division began to develop a central recruitment facility that supplies field recruiters from the home office, and uses methods such as internet recruitment to provide stores with a larger number of better qualified candidates from which to select new staff.
Management believes that the retention and recruitment of highly qualified and well-trained staff in the US head office in Akron, Ohio is essential to supporting the stores. A comprehensive in-house curriculum supplements specific job training and emphasises the importance of the working partnership between stores and the head office.
| Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 | 9 |
| 20-F | 12th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 12th |
|---|
US operating review (continued)
US head office bonuses are mainly based on the performance of the division against predetermined annual profit targets. Promotion decisions for all non-management head office personnel are based on performance against service level and production goals; for managers they are based on annual objectives and performance against individual job requirements.
Real estate
The vast majority of Signet
US stores are located in suburban areas. Kay and the regional chains are predominantly
located in regional and super-regional enclosed malls, with approximately 50%
of the stores being in prime centre court locations. The average mall store
contains approximately 1,160 square feet of selling space and 1,460 square feet
of total space. The design and appearance of stores is standardised within each
chain.
Jared locations are typically free-standing sites in shopping complexes with high visibility and traffic flow, and positioned close to major roads. The retail centres in which Jared stores operate normally contain strong retail co-tenants, including other category killer destination stores such as Borders Books, Best Buy, Home Depot and Bed, Bath & Beyond.
Details of recent investment in the store portfolio are set out below:
| Number of stores | 2004/05 | 2003/04 | 2002/03 | ||||
| Store refurbishments | |||||||
| and relocations | 76 | 61 | 71 | ||||
| New mall stores | 44 | 47 | 36 | ||||
| New off-mall stores | |||||||
| – Jared stores | 14 | 12 | 12 | ||||
| – Kay off-mall stores | 10 | 10 | – | ||||
| Store fixed capital investment | $53m | $42m | $38m | ||||
| Store total investment(1) | $140m | $98m | $92m | ||||
| (1) Fixed and working capital investment in new space and refurbishments/relocations. | |||||||
Management believes that the US division’s prime real estate portfolio, together with its regular investment in mall store refurbishments and relocations, are competitive advantages that help build store traffic. Superior like for like sales growth is normally achieved for a number of years following such investment. The typical benefits from mall store refurbishments, which normally occur on a ten year cycle, include an increase in linear footage of display cases positioned on the store frontage, improved lighting and better access to the store. When relocating a store to a better location in a mall, such as a centre court corner site from an in-line location, an increase in like for like sales is expected due to improved visibility to the customers, improved lighting and more display cases being positioned on the lease line between the store and the mall common areas.
Criteria for investment in mall real estate remain stringent. Signet seeks sites in superior malls, in particular units located on busy centre court locations.
In 2004/05 there was a net increase in the US division’s new store selling space of approximately 8%, at the top end of the target range.
In 2005/06 it is planned to open approximately 15-20 Jared stores. 40-50 mall stores, up to ten additional off-mall Kay and up to four metropolitan stores will also be opened. Around 20 mall stores are planned for closure. The programme should result in a net increase in new store space of about 8% by the end of 2005/06.
Signet may consider selective purchases of mall stores that meet its acquisition criteria regarding location, quality of real estate, customer base and return on investment for both the Kay and regional brands.
Kay
The expansion of Kay as
a nationwide chain is an important element of the US growth strategy. Kay, with
742 primarily mall stores in 50 states at 29 January 2005 (31 January 2004:
717 stores), is targeted at the middle income consumer. During 2004/05 Kay became
the largest speciality retail jewellery brand in the US based on sales. It is
believed that in the longer term there is potential to expand the Kay chain
to some 1,400 stores, including off-mall locations.
The development of Kay stores in suburban off-mall shopping centres, such as “lifestyle” and “power strip” centres, commenced in 2003/04 with the opening of ten stores. A further ten were opened in 2004/05, and it is intended that ten will be opened in 2005/06. A lifestyle centre is an open air shopping centre where the retail mix is biased toward fashion and leisure stores and is also likely to have a large number of restaurants. A power strip centre is also an open air shopping centre but the retail mix is predominantly category killer superstores with some smaller speciality units. Kay stores in these suburban centres are expected to have a lower capital expenditure, lower rents and lower sales per store at maturity than that of the Kay chain average. In 2005/06 up to four Kay stores are planned to be opened in traditional metropolitan locations in cities such as Boston, Chicago, San Francisco and New York. Kay stores in large metropolitan locations are anticipated to have higher capital expenditure, higher rents and higher sales per store at maturity than those of the Kay chain average. Management believes that the expansion of Kay in these new locations
| 10 | Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 |
| 20-F | 13th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 13th |
|---|
The following table sets out information concerning the US stores operated by Signet during the period indicated:
| 2004/05 | 2003/04 | 2002/03 | |||||
| Number of stores: | |||||||
| Total opened during the year(1) | 68 | 69 | 48 | ||||
| Kay(2) | 34 | 49 | 22 | ||||
| Regional chains | 20 | 8 | 14 | ||||
| Jared | 14 | 12 | 12 | ||||
| Total closed during the year | (15 | ) | (16 | ) | (23 | ) | |
| Kay | (9 | ) | (8 | ) | (13 | ) | |
| Regional chains | (6 | ) | (8 | ) | (10 | ) | |
| Jared | – | – | – | ||||
| Total open at the end of the year | 1,156 | 1,103 | 1,050 | ||||
| Kay(2) | 742 | 717 | 676 | ||||
| Regional chains | 321 | 307 | 307 | ||||
| Jared | 93 | 79 | 67 | ||||
| Average retail price of merchandise sold | $320 | $288 | $267 | ||||
| Kay | $282 | $257 | $242 | ||||
| Regional chains | $304 | $281 | $265 | ||||
| Jared | $644 | $586 | $558 | ||||
| Average sales per store in thousands(3)(4) | $1,816 | $1,727 | $1,643 | ||||
| Kay | $1,584 | $1,528 | $1,470 | ||||
| Regional chains | $1,533 | $1,532 | $1,536 | ||||
| Jared | $4,975 | $4,573 | $4,277 | ||||
| Increase in net new store space | 8% | 7% | 6% | ||||
| Percentage increase in like for like sales | 5.9% | 4.6% | 5.4% | ||||
| (1) | Figures for stores opened during the year are adjusted for the impact of conversions of format between Kay and regional chains. |
| (2) | Includes test of Kay stores in off-mall shopping centres. |
| (3) | Based upon stores operated for the full financial year. |
| (4) | Restated for the implementation of the amendment to FRS 5, ‘Application Note G – Revenue Recognition’. |
presents a potential opportunity to reach new customers currently not served, and gain further leverage from its marketing expenditure and the US division’s central overhead.
Regional chains
Signet also
operates US mall stores under a variety of established regional trade names
(see Description of property, page 23). The leading brands include JB Robinson
Jewelers, Marks & Morgan Jewelers and Belden Jewelers. At 29 January 2005
321 regional stores operated in 31 states (31 January 2004: 307 stores).
In recent years, new regional chain stores have been opened if real estate satisfying the investment criteria becomes available in their respective trading areas or in adjacent areas where marketing support can be cost effective. Areas in which the scale
to support cost-effective marketing can be built over a reasonable time span are now also considered for store openings. This is part of a strategy to potentially develop a second mall-based brand of sufficient size to take advantage of national television advertising. This strategy may also include the acquisition of small or large regional chains of speciality jewellery stores that meet the Group’s strict operational and financial criteria.
Jared
Jared is
the leading off-mall destination speciality retail jewellery chain in its
sector of the market. Its main competitors are independent operators, with
the next largest chain having about 25 stores. If Jared was a stand-alone
operation it would be the sixth largest US speciality jewellery retail brand
by sales.
| Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 | 11 |
| 20-F | 14th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 14th |
|---|
US operating review (continued)
The following map shows the number and locations of Kay, Regional and Jared stores at 29 January 2005.
Jared targets an under-served sector at the upper end of the middle market. The customer profile is of a more mature, higher income customer than that of Signet’s US mall stores. An important advantage of a destination store is that the potential customer visits the store with the intention of making a jewellery purchase, whereas in a mall there is a greater possibility of the intended spend being diverted to non-jewellery purchases. The typical Jared store has about 4,700 square feet of selling space and 5,900 square feet of total space. Its size permits significantly expanded product ranges and enhanced customer services, including in-store repair and custom design facilities.
A private viewing room is available for customers when required. There are also complimentary refreshments and a children’s play area.
There were 93 Jared stores at 29 January 2005 (31 January 2004: 79 stores). The average retail price of merchandise sold in Jared stores during 2004/05 was $644 (2003/04: $586), which was more than double that of a Signet US mall store.
In the first five years of trading a Jared store is projected to have a faster rate of like for like sales growth than that of a mall store
| 12 | Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 |
| 20-F | 15th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 15th |
|---|
during the same period. At the end of this period the projected operating margin is expected to have risen to around that of the mall store at maturity, with a greater return on capital employed. Excluding the three prototype stores the average sales of the 25 Jared stores that have reached maturity is $5.6 million in their fifth full year. At 29 January 2005 some 70% of the Jared stores had been open for less than five years. The average sales per Jared store opened for the whole of the 2004/05 financial year were $4,975,000 (2003/04: $4,573,000) and reflects the immaturity of Jared.
Since the first Jared store opened in 1993, the concept has been continually evaluated, developed and refined. Management believes that in addition to the competitive advantages possessed by the division as a whole, Jared also benefits from leveraging the division’s established infrastructure, access to a pool of experienced store management, and availability of capital required to develop and grow the brand.
Management believes that the Jared concept has considerable growth potential and over 100 suitable markets have been identified, with many of these markets able to support multiple locations. Accordingly, in the longer term, the chain has the potential to expand nationwide to over 225 stores, generating annual sales of over $1 billion based on the current performance of existing Jared stores. Some Jared stores are being opened to test new real estate selection criteria that may increase the potential number of sites suitable for a Jared store. These include opening Jared stores nearer to each other in established markets with above-average population density (such as Atlanta, Georgia); entering smaller markets where national television advertising would make marketing support cost-effective (such as Tulsa, Oklahoma); and locating stores attached to the exterior of covered malls (such as Des Moines, Iowa).
Merchandising
and purchasing
It is believed
that selection, availability and value for money of merchandise are all factors
that are critical to success. In the US business the range of merchandise offered
and the high level of stock availability are supported centrally by extensive
and continuous research and testing. Best-selling products are identified and
their rapid replenishment ensured through analysis of sales by stock keeping
unit. This approach enables the division to deliver a focused assortment of
merchandise to maximise sales, minimise the need for discounting and accelerate
inventory turn. The US division is able to offer superior value and consistency
of merchandise due to its industry leading direct sourcing capability.
Sophisticated inventory management systems for merchandise testing, assortment planning, allocation and replenishment have been developed and implemented. Approximately two-thirds of the merchandise is common to all US division mall stores, with the remainder allocated to reflect demand in particular markets. It is believed that the merchandising and inventory management systems, as well as improvements in the productivity of the centralised distribution centre, have allowed the division to achieve inventory turns comparable to those of most of its quoted competitors although it has a less mature store base and undertakes more direct sourcing of merchandise.
Programmes have been developed in conjunction with certain vendors for the provision of branded jewellery merchandise. For example, the Leo Diamond range is sold exclusively by Signet in the US and the UK. Management believes that the US division’s merchandising process, market share and relationship with suppliers position the business as an ideal partner to launch branding initiatives.
Other merchandising initiatives offer a distinctive product selection. For example, a major continuing initiative is being undertaken to increase the number of Jared stores that stock premium watch brands, including Rolex, Tag Heuer and Omega. Cartier will be introduced in 2005/06. Another example is the promotion of “right-hand rings”, diamond fashion rings intended to be worn on the right-hand rather than as bridal jewellery, which is traditionally worn on the left-hand ring finger. De Beers marketed this product in its nationwide print and television advertising throughout 2004/05.
In 2004/05 the bridal category accounted for over 40% of merchandise sold and continued its steady growth of the past five years.
The table below sets out Signet’s US merchandise sales mix as a percentage of sales:
| Merchandise mix | |||||||
| Merchandise mix | Percentage of sales | ||||||
| 2004/05 | 2003/04 | 2002/03 | |||||
| % | % | % | |||||
| |
|||||||
| Diamonds and diamond jewellery | 70 | 70 | 69 | ||||
| Gold jewellery | 7 | 8 | 8 | ||||
| Gemstone jewellery | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||||
| Watches | 7 | 6 | 6 | ||||
| Repairs | 6 | 6 | 7 | ||||
| |
|||||||
| Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 | 13 |
| 20-F | 16th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 16th |
|---|
US operating review (continued)
It is believed that the US division has a competitive cost and quality advantage as approximately 55% of its diamond merchandise sold is sourced through contract manufacturing; Signet purchases loose polished diamonds on the world market and outsources the casting, assembly and finishing operations to third parties. By using this approach the cost of merchandise is reduced and this cost advantage is largely used to provide superior quality to the consumer which helps to increase market share. Contract manufacturing is generally utilised on basic items with proven non-volatile historical sales patterns that represent lower risk of over or under purchasing. This purchasing strategy also allows the buyers to gain a detailed understanding of the manufacturing cost structure and improves the prospects of negotiating better pricing for the supply of finished products.
Merchandise is purchased complete as a finished product where the manufacturer’s price is more competitive than using direct sourcing, or the complexity of the product is great or the merchandise is considered likely to have a less predictable sales pattern. This strategy provides the opportunity to reserve stock held by vendors and to make supplier returns or exchanges, thereby reducing the risk of over or under purchasing.
Merchandise held on consignment is used to enhance product selection and test new designs. This minimises exposure to changes in fashion trends and obsolescence and provides the flexibility to return non-performing merchandise. At 29 January 2005 the US division held approximately $158 million (31 January 2004: $144 million) of merchandise on consignment (see note 12 on page 83).
In 2004/05 the five largest suppliers collectively accounted for approximately 25% (2003/04: 26%) of the total US division’s purchases, with the largest supplier accounting for approximately 12% (2003/04: 10%).
Marketing
and advertising
Store brand name
recognition by consumers is believed to be an important factor in jewellery
retailing, as the products themselves are predominantly unbranded. Signet
continues to strengthen and promote its US brands and build store brand
name recognition through an integrated marketing campaign. The marketing
channels used include television, radio, print, catalogues, direct mail,
telephone marketing, customer relationship marketing, point of sale signage,
in-store displays and the internet. Gross advertising and marketing expenditure
was increased by 13.0% to $135.5 million in 2004/05 (2003/04: $119.9 million),
primarily to support total mall sales growth and the continued expansion
of the Jared concept. Gross expenditure as a
percentage of sales was 6.6% (2003/04: 6.5%) reflecting the increasing proportion of sales from Jared which has a higher percentage of sales spent on marketing than the mall stores. This ratio was little changed in the mall and Jared stores.
Advertising activities are concentrated on periods when customers are expected to be most receptive to the marketing message. During the 2004 Christmas trading period the number of Kay television impressions increased by 11%. The proportion of television advertising expenditure to sales continues to grow, and the cost of network television advertising is leveraged as the number of stores increases. The romance and appreciation based theme of its advertising programme continues to utilise the tag line “Every kiss begins with Kay”, which has improved name recognition of the chain. In addition advertising in USA Today was again utilised. National radio advertising was used for the first time in 2004/05.
Seasonal promotion campaigns for the regional chains use local radio advertising as the primary medium to support and enhance name recognition. Direct mail and telephone marketing are also used to encourage repeat purchases by current customers. The regional brands’ marketing support is a similar proportion of sales as for Kay.
Jared advertising on local radio takes place for most of the year and is complemented by advertising on regional television in nearly all markets. Management believes that when the Jared chain reaches the critical mass to justify national television advertising, which is considered to be the most efficient and cost-effective form of marketing, brand name recognition will be enhanced nationwide, thus providing increased marketing leverage and improved access to prime store real estate sites in large, high cost advertising markets. This is expected to occur in 2006/07. Jared has a higher advertising to sales ratio than the division’s mall stores because it is a destination store and is still at an early stage of development. The objective in Jared advertising is to build name recognition and visit intent through an emphasis on selection and service.
In 2004/05 the US division produced 12 mall store catalogues that featured a wide selection of merchandise and were prominently displayed in stores and are also mailed directly to targeted customers. Statistical and technology based systems are employed to support a direct marketing programme that uses a proprietary database of over 22 million names to strengthen the relationship with customers. The programme targets current customers with special savings and merchandise offers during the
| 14 | Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 |
| 20-F | 17th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 17th |
|---|
key trading periods. In addition, invitations to special promotional in-store events are extended throughout the year. Special catalogues featuring ranges such as luxury watches are produced for Jared.
There are informational web sites for Kay, JB Robinson and Jared that display a selection of merchandise assortments, provide store locations, and allow for on-line customer registration and credit application. The division continues to research and monitor the development and execution of e-commerce as a channel for distribution in conjunction with the marketing and advertising programmes. When it is anticipated that there is sufficient customer demand to financially justify the necessary investment, an e-commerce facility will be added to each web site.
Credit operations
Management regards
the provision of an in-house credit programme as a competitive advantage
for a number of reasons. It allows management to establish and implement
customer service standards appropriate for the business, and also provides
a database of regular customers and their spending patterns. Investment in
systems and management of credit offerings appropriate for the business can
also be facilitated in a more cost-efficient manner than if managed by a
third party provider. Furthermore it is believed that the various credit
programmes help to establish long-term relationships with customers and complement
the marketing strategy by encouraging additional purchases and higher unit
sales.
The table below presents data related to the in-house credit business for the past three financial years. Since credit authorisation and collection systems were centralised in 1994 the credit offer and performance have been relatively consistent over the economic cycle. The average outstanding balance at the year end was $792 (2003/04: $729).
The credit portfolio turns approximately every seven months and the monthly collection rate in 2004/05 was 14.8%. The bad debt charge for the year, at 5.7% of credit sales, was near the bottom
end of the range over the last eight years. In-house credit sales represented 50.1% of total US sales in 2004/05 (2003/04: 49.3%). A number of programmes offer interest-free financing, subject to certain conditions. In most states customers are offered optional third party credit insurance.
Authorisation and collections are all performed centrally at the US headquarters on an automated basis, rather than by store staff. The majority of credit applications can be processed and approved in less than two minutes; they can be made via in-store terminals, through a toll-free phone number or on-line through the marketing web sites. All applications are evaluated by the scoring of credit data and data obtained through third party credit bureaux. In 2004/05 collection information systems were enhanced, and collection productivity was improved through work flow automation. During the year the ability to test alternative authorisation strategies was expanded and new applicant scorecards were updated. In addition to the in-house credit card, the US stores accept major credit cards. Third-party credit card sales are treated as cash sales and accounted for approximately 36% of total US sales during the year.
Investment in staff, training and systems to maintain or improve the quality of the credit portfolio continued throughout 2004/05. A new customised, collection system using the latest available technology began to be implemented in 2004/05, replacing a system that was initially installed when credit operations were centralised. It is planned that the new system will be fully implemented during 2005/06.
The new system will provide management with increased flexibility to implement and/or modify collection strategies, and a more user-friendly platform. Collection strategies and efforts continued to include increased emphasis on risk-based calling and first call resolution. In authorisations, new applicant scorecards were updated to provide improved separation in evaluating high and low-risk applicants.
| 2004/05 | 2003/04 | 2002/03 | ||||
| Credit sales ($m) | 1,035.8 | 924.3 | 859.6 | |||
| Credit sales as % of total sales | 50.1% | 49.3% | 49.5% | |||
| Number of active credit accounts at year end | 838,916 | 807,272 | 798,761 | |||
| Average outstanding account balance ($) | 792 | 729 | 688 | |||
| Average monthly collection rates | 14.8% | 14.8% | 14.5% | |||
| Bad debt as % of total sales | 2.9% | 2.8% | 3.0% | (1) | ||
| Bad debt as % of credit sales | 5.7% | 5.7% | 6.0% | (1) | ||
| (1) | Before a $2.2 million benefit from the better than anticipated performance of the residue of the acquired Marks & Morgan receivables portfolio. |
| Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 | 15 |
| 20-F | 18th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 18th |
|---|
US operating review (continued)
Management
tools and communications
The US division’s
highly integrated and comprehensive information systems provide detailed, timely
information to monitor and evaluate virtually every aspect of the business
and are designed to decrease the time sales staff spend on administrative tasks
and increase time spent on sales activities. They also support merchandise
testing,
loss prevention and inventory control.
All stores are supported by the internally developed Store Information System, which includes electronic point of sale (“EPOS”) processing, in-house credit authorisation and support, a district manager information system and a satellite-based communications system that supports data transmissions and company-wide e-mail. The EPOS system updates sales, in-house credit and perpetual inventory replenishment systems from data captured throughout the day for each store.
In order to allow staff more time for selling and customer service, further steps in the “World Class Store Systems” initiatives were taken. These have resulted in improvements in special orders and repair services procedures.
Regulation
While there are many
regulations within which Signet US operates, the speciality jewellery sector
is generally a lightly regulated business. Signet US is required to comply
with numerous US federal and state laws and regulations covering areas such
as consumer protection, consumer privacy, consumer credit, consumer credit
insurance, truth in advertising and employment legislation. Management endeavours
to monitor changes in these laws to ensure that its practices comply with
applicable requirements.
| 16 | Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 |
| 20-F | 19th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 19th |
|---|
UK operating review


Overview
Signet is the
largest speciality retailer of fine jewellery in the UK, with 602 stores and
a total market share of approximately 17%. It trades as H.Samuel (17.6% of Group
sales), targeting the middle market, and Ernest Jones (13.8% of Group sales),
positioned at the upper end of the middle market. Total sales during 2004/05
were £514.4 million (2003/04: £501.0 million).
At 29 January 2005 there were 398 H.Samuel stores and 204 Ernest Jones stores (including 16 Leslie Davis stores). Approximately 48% of these are located in prime “High Streets” (main shopping streets with high pedestrian traffic) and 52% are in covered or enclosed shopping malls. High Street stores accounted for 40% of total UK division sales and shopping mall stores for 60%. H.Samuel is the largest chain of speciality retail jewellers in the UK and its stores are located in virtually every medium and large retail centre. Ernest Jones, the second largest speciality retail jewellery chain, is represented in most large retail centres.
The UK strategy is to increase the average transaction value by focusing on fast growing product categories, particularly diamond jewellery, thereby improving store productivity and achieving operational leverage. To achieve this the division has a series of initiatives in the key areas of retail execution that are designed to grow the sales of diamonds.
Competitive
advantages
Signet has
a range of advantages in store operations and personnel, real estate, merchandising,
marketing and access to US expertise compared to competitors within the UK speciality
jewellery retail market. The principal competitive advantages are summarised
below and explained in greater detail on pages 18 to 21.
• Store
operations and personnel
The division’s
scale enables it to develop and invest in training procedures tailored to its
own requirements. This is particularly important, as the sale of diamond jewellery
requires increased standards of product knowledge and customer service from
sales associates. The division also enjoys economies of scale in recruitment
and store administration.
• Real
estate
Strict criteria
are followed when evaluating real estate investment, and management believes
that the quality of its store portfolio is superior to that of many of its competitors.
The strength of the Group’s balance sheet and the division’s trading
record makes it an attractive tenant. The well tested revised store format,
which is more suited to selling diamonds, enables the division to take better
advantage of one of the fastest growing major categories within the UK jewellery
market.
• Merchandising
Management believes
that the division’s leading position in the UK jewellery sector is a commercial
advantage when sourcing merchandise and enables delivery of better value to
the customer. An example of this is its capacity to contract with jewellery
manufacturers to assemble products, utilising directly sourced gold and loose
polished diamonds. In addition the division has the scale to utilise sophisticated
merchandising systems to test, track, forecast and respond to consumer preferences.
• Marketing
The UK division
has strong and well established brands and leverages them with advertising (both
print and television), catalogues and the development of customer relationship
marketing techniques. Few of its competitors have sufficient scale to utilise
these marketing methods successfully.
• Access
to US expertise
The UK business
also benefits from its close relationship with Signet’s US operations.
Synergies are gained by sharing knowledge in merchandising, marketing, operations,
systems and best practice procedures. None of the UK division’s competitors
has similar access to a leading operator in the world’s largest jewellery
market.
Initiatives
in 2004/05
Specific initiatives
taken to strengthen the division’s competitive position included:
Store operations and personnel
• enhanced recruitment processes
| Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 | 17 |
| 20-F | 20th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 20th |
|---|
UK operating review (continued)
| • | increased by over 10% the proportion of store managers and assistant store managers with externally accredited jewellers qualifications |
| • | tested new sales commission system |
| Real estate | |
| • | rolled-out revised store design to an additional 90 stores |
| • | opened three retail park locations |
| Merchandising | |
| • | increased the size, quality and range of settings of diamond jewellery |
| • | further widened the Leo Diamond range in Ernest Jones |
| • | expanded the Forever Diamond range from 120 stores to all H.Samuel stores |
| Marketing | |
| • | expanded the television advertising for H.Samuel and Ernest Jones |
| • | introduced customer relationship marketing by Ernest Jones |
| • | continued the development of catalogue design and distribution |
Marketplace
Although reliable figures
on the size of the UK jewellery market are difficult to obtain, management estimates
that in calendar year 2004 the size of the total UK market for fine jewellery,
costume jewellery and watches was approximately £3.6 billion ($6.7 billion)
(including VAT of 17.5%). The market includes speciality retail jewellers and
non-speciality jewellery retailers such as mail order catalogues, catalogue
showrooms and jewellery departments in department stores. In the UK the value
of diamond sales are estimated by De Beers to have increased by a compound annual
rate of 7.1% over the last 5 years (2004 growth is a management estimate).
The UK retail jewellery market is very fragmented and competitive, with a substantial number of independent speciality jewellery retailers. Management believes there are approximately 7,000 speciality retail jewellery stores in the UK.
In the middle market H.Samuel competes with a large number of independent jewellers, the only competitor of significant size being F Hinds (108 stores). Competition at the lower end of the H.Samuel product range also comes from catalogue showroom outlets such as Argos and discount jewellery retailers such as Warren James (119 stores).
In the upper middle market Ernest Jones’ competition is from independent speciality retailers and a limited number of other upper middle market jewellery groups such as Goldsmiths Group
(169 stores); Beaverbrooks (57 stores); and MW Group (33 stores).
Based on surveys, management believes that customers are attracted to H.Samuel because they have confidence in the brand and its staff is perceived to be friendly, helpful and knowledgeable. Ernest Jones is perceived to offer high quality merchandise and premium service from a professional and knowledgeable staff.
Store operations
and personnel
Management
regards customer service as an essential element in the success of its business.
During 2003/04 the “Signet Jewellery Academy,” a multi-year training
programme and framework for measuring standards of capability, was introduced
for all store staff. As part of this programme just over two-thirds of all store
managers and assistant store managers have now passed the National Association
of Goldsmiths accredited Jewellery Education & Training Level 1 qualification.
Upon completion of each of the five levels of the Academy, the staff member
normally takes on increasing responsibilities. Training programmes have contributed
to the improvement in the quality, performance and retention of UK staff.
The new recruitment procedures continue to improve the suitability of new store personnel helping to ensure that they meet key basic requirements and are motivated to work within the jewellery store environment. Field and human resources management are responsible for the recruitment, performance review, training and development of sales staff, thereby ensuring consistency in operating standards and procedures throughout the business. All new store personnel must complete a “selling skills” learning programme during their probationary period and thereafter undertake additional training in selling, product knowledge and customer care.
All store personnel have daily performance targets. They are given training and weekly feedback on their performance from store and field management to help them achieve these targets.
In conjunction with the Signet Jewellery Academy, training for all tiers of store operations management was developed further last year to support the initiative to improve customer service. In 2004/05 the number of training courses completed nearly doubled. The preferred policy is to promote store managers from within the business; approximately 70% of store management appointed in 2004/05 were promoted from within the organisation. At any given time each chain has a number of sales staff who are qualified to advance to store management level, thus assuring the availability of newly trained managers familiar with operating standards and procedures.
| 18 | Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 |
| 20-F | 21st "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 21st |
|---|
In order to increase staff selling time and to improve efficiency, operating procedures are routinely reviewed to identify opportunities to enhance customer service and reduce in-store administrative tasks. The Signet intranet, introduced in all stores in 2003, provides a computer-based platform for improved communication between stores and head office, with sales floor and back office administrative functions being simplified and standardised through this medium.
Various incentive schemes are operated to motivate and reward performance in the stores including bonuses based on key performance targets. In 2004/05 a commission-based remuneration test was carried out designed to increase the proportion of performance-related payments over time. The level of commission paid is dependent on the sales achieved by the individual and the overall sales of the store. During 2005/06 this commission system will be introduced more widely across the division.
Management also believes that successful recruitment, training and retention of head office staff is essential. Comprehensive recruitment, training and incentive programmes for head office staff are in place in the Colindale and Birmingham offices. Programmes to provide employees with structured development plans, training and career paths have been implemented. Internal career advancement is encouraged and is supported by a succession planning process. Teamwork and service to the stores are encouraged through a performance bonus plan for head office staff, which is based on the division’s results.
Opportunities for improving employment practices were identified through a “Staff Opinion Survey”. It is believed that the results provide a basis for further improvement in the motivation and retention of staff.
Real estate
In 2001/02
a revised store design better suited to the sale of diamonds and fine jewellery
was developed as part of the programme to increase sales and store productivity
by focusing on the fast growing diamond category. The design allows greater
interaction between sales associates and customers and better presentation
of merchandise. The design was tested during 2002/03 and 2003/04 and a roll-out
programme commenced in 2004/05.
The performance of the new format has continued to be encouraging. The increase in sales from the additional investment meets the well established Group investment criteria. The reformatted stores achieved a rise in both diamond sales and average retail price. An additional 90 stores, primarily H.Samuel, were trading in the new format at 29 January 2005, bringing the
total to 142, accounting for about 30% of the UK division’s sales. A multi-year rollout plan for the new format is being implemented as part of the normal refurbishment cycle; it is planned to refurbish or relocate 80 to 90 stores in 2005/06, the majority again being H.Samuel.
The new format features open frontages which are intended to make the store more accessible and inviting to the customer, as well as improved presentation of the merchandise. The design draws on the Group’s mall store experience in the US, and for mall locations include display cases on the frontage with the concourse, rather than the traditional window presentation. The High Street stores have wide floor-to-ceiling windows that provide views directly into the store.
Much of the merchandise is presented in low level display units that also serve as service counters and allow the sales associate to present an assortment of merchandise to the customer without having to break away to select additional merchandise from the window displays, as in the traditionally designed store.
Details of recent investment in the store portfolio are set out below:
| Number of stores | 2004/05 | 2003/04 | 2002/03 | ||||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
||
| Store refurbishments and relocations | 81 | 32 | 42 | ||||
| New H.Samuel stores | 2 | – | 4 | ||||
| New Ernest Jones stores | 7 | 5 | 8 | ||||
| Store fixed capital investment | £23m | £13m | £14m | ||||
| |
H.Samuel
H.Samuel,
accounting for 17.6% of Group sales in 2004/05 (2003/04: 17.8%), offers a
range of jewellery, gold, watches and gifts (see page 20, Merchandise mix).
At 29 January 2005 average selling space was 1,113 square feet per store.
| H.Samuel store data | |||||||
| 2004/05 | 2003/04 | 2002/03 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| Number of stores: | |||||||
| Opened during year | 2 | – | 4 | ||||
| Closed during year | (11 | ) | (11 | ) | (8 | ) | |
| Open at end of year | 398 | 407 | 418 | ||||
| Percentage increase in like for like sales | 1.9 | % | 3.5 | % | 2.6 | % | |
| Average retail price of items sold(1) | £37 | £35 | £33 | ||||
| Average sales per store | |||||||
| in thousands (exc. VAT)(2) | £723 | £707 | £677 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) | Excluding accessories, repairs and warranties. | |
| (2) | Including only stores operated for the full financial year. |
The average retail price of items sold has increased at a compound annual growth rate of 7.3% over the last five years. This upward trend is expected to continue as the sales mix of diamonds is anticipated to rise and that of gifts to decline as a percentage of sales. Average sales per store have increased at a compound annual growth rate of 4.7% over the same period.
| Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 | 19 |
| 20-F | 22nd "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 22nd |
|---|
UK operating review (continued)
Ernest Jones (including Leslie Davis)
Ernest Jones sales accounted for 13.8% of Group sales in 2004/05 (2003/04: 13.0%). Where local market size and the availability of suitable watch agencies permit, the Ernest Jones chain follows a
two-site strategy, using the trade names Ernest Jones and Leslie Davis.
The principal product categories are diamonds, branded watches and gold jewellery, which are all merchandised and marketed to appeal to the more affluent upper middle market customer (see Merchandise mix table). Ernest Jones retails an extensive range of diamond and gold jewellery as well as prestige watches such as Cartier, Omega, Rado, Raymond Weil, Rolex, and Tag Heuer. It also sells contemporary fashion watches such as Calvin Klein, DKNY, Emporio Armani, Gucci, Hugo Boss and a range of traditional watches including Rotary, Seiko and Tissot.
At 29 January 2005 the chain had average selling space of 852 square feet per store. The average retail price of items sold has increased at a compound annual growth rate of 5.3% over the last five years. Over the same period average sales per store increased at an annual compound growth rate of 10.4% and were the most productive mall stores in the Group. Management considers that there is potential to increase the number of Ernest Jones stores to approximately 225 as suitable sites and watch agencies become available.
| Ernest Jones store data(1) | |||||||
| 2004/05 | 2003/04 | 2002/03 | |||||
| Number of stores: | |||||||
| Opened during year | 7 | 5 | 8 | ||||
| Closed during year | – | – | – | ||||
| Open at end of year | 204 | 197 | 192 | ||||
| Percentage increase in like for like sales | 4.5% | 8.4% | 9.4% | ||||
| Average retail price of items sold(2) | £141 | £139 | £130 | ||||
| Average sales per store in | |||||||
| thousands (exc. VAT)(3) | £1,150 | £1,101 | £1,030 | ||||
| (1) | Including Leslie Davis stores. |
| (2) | Excluding accessories, repairs and warranties. |
| (3) | Including only stores operated for the full financial year. |
Merchandising and purchasing
The division retails an extensive range of merchandise including gold and silver jewellery, watches, diamond and gemstone set jewellery and gifts. As with other UK speciality retail jewellers,
most gold jewellery sold is 9 carat. However, sales of 18 carat gold jewellery, particularly white gold, have been increasing.
The merchandise mix of the UK division is given below. In 2004/05 diamond jewellery sales accounted for 28% of total Signet UK sales versus 20% five years ago. In line with the strategy of the UK division to increase the percentage of diamonds in the merchandise sales mix, the compound annual growth rate of
Signet UK diamond sales was 13.9% over the period, nearly double that of the UK diamond market.
| Merchandise mix | |||||||
| Percentage of sales | |||||||
| 2004/05 | 2003/04 | 2002/03 | |||||
| Gold and silver jewellery | |||||||
| H.Samuel | 37 | 37 | 36 | ||||
| Ernest Jones | 27 | 26 | 26 | ||||
| Signet UK | 32 | 33 | 32 | ||||
| Watches | |||||||
| H.Samuel | 23 | 23 | 24 | ||||
| Ernest Jones | 29 | 31 | 32 | ||||
| Signet UK | 26 | 26 | 27 | ||||
| Diamond jewellery | |||||||
| H.Samuel | 20 | 19 | 18 | ||||
| Ernest Jones | 38 | 36 | 35 | ||||
| Signet UK | 28 | 26 | 25 | ||||
| Gifts | |||||||
| H.Samuel | 13 | 14 | 14 | ||||
| Ernest Jones | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| Signet UK | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||||
| Repairs and accessories | |||||||
| H.Samuel | 7 | 7 | 8 | ||||
| Ernest Jones | 4 | 4 | 4 | ||||
| Signet UK | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||
Merchandise is purchased from a range of suppliers and manufacturers. In 2004/05 the five largest of these all watch suppliers together accounted for approximately 21% of total UK division purchases, with the largest accounting for approximately 6%. Only a small percentage of merchandise is purchased on consignment (see note 12 on page 83).
Economies of scale continued to be achieved by combining the volume of purchases for H.Samuel and Ernest Jones. Some 23% of the UK business’ gold jewellery is manufactured on a contract basis in Italy through a buying office in Vicenza, Italy, thereby eliminating the costs associated with intermediaries.
Signet UK also employs contract manufacturers for approximately 31% of the diamond merchandise sold, thereby achieving cost savings. Both H.Samuel and Ernest Jones employ experienced buyers who concentrate on product development, sourcing and supplier management appropriate to their particular needs. Overseas direct sourcing capability in most product areas has been increased. Such purchases have grown by 175% in value since 1999/00, and now account for 30% of the merchandise mix.
Merchandising teams work in conjunction with the buyers and focus on assortment planning, branch grading, repeat orders, inventory levels and margin management. Product category reviews are regularly carried out with a focus on increasing potential gross margin return on investment. Rigorous test marketing procedures are used to trial products, and their
| 20 | Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 |
| 20-F | 23rd "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 23rd |
|---|
subsequent distribution is made strictly against rates of sale. The merchandise ranges have been rationalised, with greater focus on key items, and a wider choice in the most popular categories is offered whilst peripheral merchandising is reduced.
The size and quality of diamond jewellery available to customers was enhanced during the year, with a greater proportion of precious white metals. Branded diamonds exclusive to Signet have been developed in recent years, an example of which is the Leo Diamond available in all Ernest Jones stores with an increased range offered in 2004/05. The Forever Diamonds range is now sold in all H.Samuel stores; it was available in 50 stores in 2002/03 and 120 in 2003/04. Both the Leo Diamond and the Forever Diamond have unique cuts that provide greater sparkle and brilliance than an ordinarily cut diamond of similar size, colour and clarity. The Leo Diamond utilises a higher quality diamond and therefore retails at a higher price than the Forever Diamond.
Each store is assigned a range of merchandise that reflects local buying patterns. Display equipment and layouts are constantly reviewed and updated, and new display formats that draw upon the US division’s experience have been implemented.
Marketing and advertising
Gross expenditure on marketing and advertising amounted to 3.0% of sales in 2004/05 (2003/04: 2.5% and 2002/03: 2.2%), reflecting the increased trialling of television advertising. Marketing
campaigns have been tailored to reinforce and develop further the distinct brand identities of H.Samuel as a middle market jewellery chain and Ernest Jones as a more upmarket diamond and watch specialist. Both campaigns aim to expand the overall
customer base and improve customer loyalty.
The primary marketing and advertising medium employed in 2004/05 consisted of a series of catalogues for each brand, distributed as inserts in newspapers and magazines and available in all stores. The quality of catalogues was improved and their distribution was better targeted.
The trial of television advertising was further expanded for both chains during Christmas 2004. It was the second year of a large-scale test and took place in regions representing about 65% of the H.Samuel store base and 60% of the Ernest Jones store base. It is planned to continue the development of television advertising in 2005/06.
Public relations initiatives resulted in greater coverage by national and consumer lifestyle media titles. Targeted marketing was increased to publicise special promotional events in the run-
up to Valentine’s Day and Christmas. During 2004/05 customer relationship marketing was successfully trialled for Ernest Jones and will be developed further in 2005/06.
During 2004/05 the content and interactivity of the UK marketing web sites (www.hsamuel.co.uk, www.ernestjones.co.uk and www.lesliedavis.co.uk) continued to be developed. The sites have again seen a substantial increase in visitor traffic. The division continues to monitor the development and execution of e-commerce as a distribution channel and to investigate the economic feasibility of introducing an e-commerce capability to the division’s web sites. There is an increasing use of e-commerce by consumers in the UK. When it is anticipated that there is sufficient customer demand to financially justify the necessary investment, an e-commerce facility will be added to each web site as appropriate.
Insurance loss replacement business
Management believes that Signet is the leading UK jewellery retailer in the insurance loss replacement business, which involves the settlement of insurance claims by product replacement through
jewellery stores rather than by cash settlements from the insurance company. This allows the division to benefit from the resulting higher customer traffic in the stores and the opportunity to create and build relationships with new customers. Given
its nationwide store portfolio, breadth of product range and ability to invest in systems to support the business, the division is well positioned to benefit from insurance companies settling claims in this manner.
Credit operations
Whilst the division does not have an in-house credit operation, it does accept major credit cards. Credit card sales are treated as cash transactions and accounted for approximately 31% of sales
during 2004/05 (2003/04: 31%). During the period approximately 3% (2003/04: 3%) of sales in the UK were made pursuant to interest-free programmes available for purchases above a particular price. The receivables for the interest-free programmes are
sold at a discount on a limited recourse basis and administered by an unaffiliated company.
Management tools and communications
EPOS equipment, retail
management systems, purchase order management systems and merchandise planning
processes are in place to support financial management, inventory planning and
control, purchasing, merchandising, replenishment and distribution and can ensure
replacement within 24 hours of any merchandise sold. These systems have been
upgraded to enable the implementation of “chip and pin” technology
to reduce
credit
| Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 | 21 |
| 20-F | 24th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 24th |
|---|
UK operating review (continued)
and debit card fraud. The first phase of an electronic “Business To Business” communications project, developed to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of dealing with suppliers, was implemented.
A perpetual inventory process allows store managers to check stock by product category. These systems are designed to assist control of shrinkage, fraud prevention, financial analysis of retail operations, merchandising and inventory control.
New systems have been introduced to enhance control over cash banking to support financial management. Major computer hardware upgrades have taken place to improve resilience and capacity, particularly during the peak Christmas season.
The administration centre at Colindale in North London is the head office for UK store operations and houses the division’s senior management, financial planning, marketing, and buying and merchandising functions. The facilities for payroll, human resources, information technology, certain finance functions, distribution and customer services, as well as the insurance replacement business and call centre, are located in Birmingham.
During 2004/05 various central administrative functions were relocated from Colindale and consolidated in Birmingham to enhance efficiency and should result in future cost savings.
Regulation
While there are many regulations
within which the UK division operates it is generally a lightly regulated business.
Various laws and regulations affect Signet’s UK operations. These cover
areas such as consumer protection, consumer credit, data protection, health
and safety, waste disposal, employment legislation and planning and development
standards. Management monitors changes in these laws with a view to ensuring
that its
practices comply with legal requirements.
| 22 | Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 |
| 20-F | 25th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 25th |
|---|
Description of property & Group employees
Signet attributes great importance to the location and appearance of its stores. Accordingly, in both Signet’s US and UK operations, investment decisions on selecting sites and refurbishing stores are made centrally, and strict real estate criteria are applied.
The Group has sufficient distribution capacity to meet its current requirements and plans to increase capacity in 2005/06 to support future sales growth.
US
Substantially all of Signet’s
US stores are leased. In addition to a minimum annual rental, a significant number
of stores will also pay turnover related rent based on sales above a specified
base level. Under the terms of the typical lease, the US business is required
to conform and maintain its usage to agreed standards, including meeting required
advertising expenditure as a percentage of sales, and is responsible for its
proportionate share of expenses associated with common area maintenance, utilities
and taxes of the mall. The initial term of a mall store lease is generally ten
years. At 29 January 2005 the average unexpired lease term of US leased premises
was six years and some 47.6% of leases had terms expiring within five years.
The Jared stores are normally on 20 year leases with options to extend the lease
and their rents are not turnover related.
The US division leases 17% of its store locations from Simon Property Group and 15% from General Growth Management, Inc. Otherwise, the division has no relationship with any lessor relating to 10% or more of its store locations.
During the past five financial years the US business has been generally successful in renewing its store leases as they expire and has not experienced difficulty in securing suitable locations for its stores. It is not believed that any of the store leases are individually material to the Group’s US operations.
A 340,000 square foot head office facility is leased in Akron, Ohio. In addition a 19,000 square foot repair centre is being established in Akron. This facility is leased and is expected to open in 2005/06. The relocation of the US division central repair facility from the head office premises will enable the further expansion of the distribution capacity during 2005/06.
UK
At
29 January 2005 Signet UK held seven freehold premises, five premises where the
lease had a remaining
term in excess of 25 years and 590 other leasehold premises. As is typically
the case in
retailing in the UK, the division’s stores are leased for terms of up
to 25 years, generally under full repairing and insuring leases (equivalent
to triple
net leases in the US).
Wherever possible Signet is shortening the length of new leases
that it enters into in order to improve the flexibility of its lease commitments. Rents are usually subject to upward review every five years if market conditions so warrant. An increasing proportion of rents are related to sales of the store, subject to a minimum annual value. At the end of the lease period, subject to certain limited exceptions, leaseholders generally have statutory rights to enter into a new lease of the premises on negotiated terms. At 29 January 2005 the average unexpired lease term of Signet’s leased premises in the UK was 12 years. As current leases expire, Signet believes that it will be able to renew leases, if desired, for present store locations or to obtain leases in equivalent or improved locations in the same general areas. Signet has not experienced difficulty in securing leases for suitable locations for its UK stores. It is not believed that any of the store leases are individually material to the Group’s UK operations.
Signet owns a 255,000 square foot warehouse and distribution centre in Birmingham. Following the relocation and consolidation of certain of the UK division’s central administration functions to Birmingham to enhance efficiency, a contract to sell the 120,000 square foot administration centre at Colindale in North London has been entered into and is expected to be completed in August 2005.
Trademarks and trade names
Signet is not dependent
on any material patents or licenses in either the US or the UK; however, it does
have several well established trademarks and trade names which are significant
in maintaining its reputation and competitive position in the jewellery retailing
industry in both the US and the UK. These registered trademarks and trade names
include the following in Signet’s US operations: Kay Jewelers; Jared The Galleria Of
Jewelry; JB Robinson Jewelers; Marks & Morgan Jewelers; Belden Jewelers; Weisfield Jewelers; Osterman Jewelers; Shaw’s Jewelers; Rogers Jewelers; LeRoy’s Jewelers; Goodman Jewelers; Friedlander’s Jewelers; Every kiss begins with
Kay; and Perfect Partner. Trademarks and trade names include the following in Signet’s
UK operations: H.Samuel; Ernest Jones; Leslie Davis; and Forever Diamonds.
Group employees
In 2004/05 the average number of full-time equivalent persons employed (including directors) was 15,145 (UK: 4,477; US: 10,668). The Company usually employs a limited number of temporary
employees during each Christmas season.
None of Signet’s employees in the UK and less than 1% of Signet’s employees in the US are covered by collective bargaining agreements. Signet considers its relationship with its employees to be excellent.
| Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 | 23 |
| 20-F | 26th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 26th |
|---|
Financial review
for
the 52 weeks ended 29 January 2005
| 2004/05 | 2003/04 | (1) | 2002/03 | (1) | ||||||||
| £m | % | £m | % | £m | % | |||||||
| Sales | ||||||||||||
| US | 1,100.0 | 68.1 | 1,103.9 | 68.8 | 1,120.0 | 70.3 | ||||||
| UK | 514.4 | 31.9 | 501.0 | 31.2 | 473.6 | 29.7 | ||||||
| Total | 1,614.4 | 100.0 | 1,604.9 | 100.0 | 1,593.6 | 100.0 | ||||||
| Operating profit: | ||||||||||||
| US | 147.3 | 70.0 | 139.3 | 69.7 | 141.2 | 76.0 | ||||||
| UK | 78.2 | 37.2 | 76.6 | 38.3 | 64.7 | 34.8 | ||||||
| Group central costs | (6.6 | ) | (3.1 | ) | (5.7 | ) | (2.9 | ) | (6.0 | ) | (3.2 | ) |
| 218.9 | 104.1 | 210.2 | 105.1 | 199.9 | 107.6 | |||||||
| Net interest payable | (8.6 | ) | (4.1 | ) | (10.4 | ) | (5.1 | ) | (14.0 | ) | (7.6 | ) |
| Profit before tax | 210.3 | 100.0 | 199.8 | 100.0 | 185.9 | 100.0 | ||||||
| (1) | Restated for the implementation in 2004/05 of the amendment to FRS 5, ‘Application Note G – Revenue Recognition’. |
Introduction
The key drivers of operating profitability are the:
| • | rate of sales growth, |
| • | balance between like for like sales growth and sales from new store space, |
| • | achieved gross margin, |
| • | level of cost increases experienced by the Group, |
| • | level of net bad debt charge relating to the in-house credit card in the US, and |
| • | movements in the US dollar to pound sterling exchange rate, since the majority of the Group’s profits are generated in the US and the Group reports in pounds sterling. |
The gross margin percentage in retail jewellery is above the average for speciality retailers reflecting the slow inventory turn. The trend in gross margin depends on Signet’s pricing policy and movements in the cost of merchandise sold and the direct cost of providing services such as repairs. The cost of goods sold that is used to arrive at gross profit takes into account all costs incurred in the purchase, processing and distribution of the merchandise and all costs directly incurred in the operation and support of the retail outlets. The classification of distribution and selling costs under UK GAAP varies from company to company and therefore the gross profit percentage may not be comparable from one company to another.
In general, gross margin on gold jewellery is above the Group’s average, while that of diamond jewellery is broadly in line with the Group’s average. The gross margin on watches and gift products is normally below that of diamond jewellery. Within the diamond jewellery category the gross margin varies depending
on the proportion of the merchandise cost accounted for by the value of the diamonds, and the greater the proportion, the lower the gross margin. In addition, the gross margin in a Jared store is slightly below that of a mall store, although at maturity the store contribution percentage of a Jared store is similar to that of a mall store. A change in merchandise mix will therefore impact the Group’s UK and US division’s gross margin and a change in the proportion of sales from Jared will impact the gross margin of both the US division and Group.
To maintain the operating profit margin the Group needs to achieve like for like sales growth sufficient to offset any adverse movement in gross margin, the increase in operating costs and the impact of immature selling space. There are not any known trends or uncertainties in future rent or amortisation expenses that could materially affect operating results or cash flows. Like for like sales growth above the level required to offset the factors outlined above, allows the Group to achieve leverage of its fixed cost base and improve operating margin; slower sales growth results in reduced operating margin.
Signet’s longer term strategy of 7% – 9% new store space growth in the US, with minimal net new space in the UK, means lower like for like sales growth is required in the UK than in the US to maintain operating margin.
The impact on operating profits of sales variances (either adverse or favourable) is less in the US division than the UK, as certain expense items are more related to sales volumes in the US.
A key factor in driving operating margin is the level of average sales per store, with higher productivity allowing leverage of expenses both in store and in central functions.
| 24 | Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 |
| 20-F | 27th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 27th |
|---|
Movements in the US dollar to pound sterling exchange rate impact the reported results of the Group as the US division’s results are translated into pounds sterling. The Board believes it is inappropriate to hedge this exposure as the US division’s sales and costs are dollar denominated and the cash flow from the US division is largely reinvested in the US space expansion or used to pay down US dollar denominated borrowings. The Group therefore would be putting in place a cash exposure to hedge a translation risk.
52 weeks ended 29 January 2005
Total Group sales rose
to £1,614.4 million (2003/04: £1,604.9 million restated), up by 0.6%
on a reported basis and 7.8% at constant exchange rates. Group like for like
sales were up
by 5.0% and new space contributed 2.7% (see table below).
Group operating margin increased to 13.6% (2003/04: 13.1% restated), with leverage from like for like sales growth more than offsetting the impact of immature space growth with gross margin little changed. The growth in total sales and the increased operating margin resulted in Group operating profit advancing to £218.9 million (2003/04: £210.2 million restated), up by 4.1% on a reported basis and 11.3% at constant exchange rates.
Net interest payable and similar charges decreased to £8.6 million (2003/04: £10.4 million). The reduction was principally due to exchange translation and an increase in net interest credit on the UK defined benefits pension scheme.
Group profit before tax increased to £210.3 million (2003/04: £199.8 million restated), up by 5.3% on a reported basis and 12.1% at constant exchange rates. After a tax charge of 32.9% (2003/04: 35.1% restated) profit for the financial period rose by 9.0% to £141.2 million (2003/04: £129.6 million restated), an increase of 16.0% at constant exchange rates. It is anticipated that the tax charge for 2005/06 will be approximately 34.0%. Earnings per share was 8.2p (2003/04: 7.5p restated), up by 9.3% on a reported basis and 15.5% at constant exchange rates.
| Sales | ||||||
| 2004/05 sales growth | ||||||
| US % | UK % | Group % | ||||
| Like for like | 5.9 | 3.0 | 5.0 | |||
| New store space | 4.4 | (0.3 | ) | 2.7 | ||
| Exchange translation | (10.7 | ) | – | (7.2 | ) | |
| Total sales growth | (0.4 | ) | 2.7 | 0.5 | ||
US
Like
for like sales for the US division increased by 5.9% and total US dollar
sales by 10.3%. The US division had a very strong start
to 2004/05 with an excellent performance during the Valentine’s Day period. Although the retail environment became less predictable as the year progressed the business had a strong fourth quarter with like for like sales up by 4.7%. The contribution from new store space and the impact of exchange rate movements is shown in the table above.
UK
In the UK the rate of growth in retail sales slowed as the year progressed. This was reflected by the performance of the UK division with like for like sales growth slowing from 6.7% in the first
quarter to 1.4% in the fourth quarter. For the year as a whole like for like sales increased by 3.0% and total sales by 2.7%.
Operating profit
| Operating margin movement | ||||||
| US % | UK % | Group % | ||||
| 2003/04 margin | 12.6 | (1) | 15.3 | 13.1 | (1) | |
| Gross margin | – | 0.6 | 0.2 | |||
| Expenses | 1.2 | (0.4 | ) | 0.7 | ||
| New store space | (0.4 | ) | – | (0.3 | ) | |
| Restructuring charge | – | (0.3 | ) | (0.1 | ) | |
| 2004/05 margin | 13.4 | 15.2 | 13.6 | |||
| (1) | Restated for the implementation in 2004/05 of the amendment to FRS 5, ‘Application Note G – Revenue Recognition’. |
US
The operating margin in
the US division increased to 13.4% (2003/04: 12.6% restated), with the leverage
from like for like sales growth more than offsetting the impact of immature store
space (see table above). The ratio of net bad debt to sales was little changed
at 2.9%. Operating profit was £147.3 million (2003/04: £139.3 million
restated), up by 5.7% on a reported basis and 17.1% at constant exchange rates.
UK
The division’s gross margin benefited from lower sterling commodity costs. The operating margin at 15.2% was little changed after absorbing a restructuring expense of £1.7 million and
higher advertising, depreciation and training costs. These increases reflect the execution of the UK growth strategy and may be repeated in future years. Operating profit grew by 2.1% to £78.2 million (2003/04: £76.6
million).
Group costs
Group central costs amounted
to £6.6 million (2003/04: £5.7 million), the increase primarily reflecting costs associated with new corporate governance practices and a net property
provision of £0.4 million (2003/04: £nil). In 2005/06 a further increase
in Group costs is anticipated.
| Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 | 25 |
| 20-F | 28th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 28th |
|---|
Financial review (continued)
Prior year adjustment
The accounting policy
in respect of extended service agreements in the US was changed following an
amendment to FRS 5 ‘Reporting the Substance of Transactions’ in the
form of ‘Application Note G – Revenue Recognition’. The Group
now spreads the revenue arising, net of incremental costs arising, from the
initial sale, in proportion to anticipated claims arising. Previously the Group
recognised the revenue from such plans at the date of sale with provision being
made for the estimated cost of future claims arising.
As a result of this change the Group has restated prior years. Therefore the previously reported 2003/04 results now reflect a decrease in sales of £12.3 million and a reduction in profit before tax of £12.1 million. The difference of £0.2 million represents the movement in the incremental cost provision applied under the previous accounting policy. Consequently, restated profit before tax for the 52 weeks ended 31 January 2004 is £199.8 million. The effect on brought forward reserves at 31 January 2004 is a reduction of £52.7 million net of deferred tax, with shareholders’ funds at 31 January 2004 therefore restated to £674.9 million. The adjustment does not affect cash flows from operations.
Return on capital
employed
The Group’s ROCE
was 26.5% (2003/04: 25.9% restated). In the US the ROCE was 22.4% (2003/04:
21.3% restated) reflecting the impact of an increased proportion of immature
space largely from new Jared stores partially offsetting the improved operating
profit. In the UK there was a slight decrease to 44.7% (2003/04: 47.1%) reflecting
the roll-out of the revised store format and increased investment in diamond
jewellery inventory. US capital employed included in-house credit card debtors
of £319.0 million at 29 January 2005 (2003/04: £292.6 million at
31 January
2004).
Depreciation
and capital expenditure
Depreciation charges were
£41.3 million (2003/04: £39.3 million): £23.9 million (2003/04:
£23.6 million) in the US and £17.4 million (2003/04: £15.7
million) in the UK. Capital expenditure in the US was £41.7 million (2003/04:
£33.1 million) and in the UK was £28.8 million (2003/04: £17.8
million). The additional capital expenditure in the US is primarily due to the
increase in the rate of new store space growth. The increase in the depreciation
charge and capital expenditure in the UK reflected the roll-out of the revised
store format.
Dividends
In November 2004 an interim
dividend of 0.375p per share was paid (2003/04: 0.341p). The Board is recommending
to shareholders a final dividend of 2.625p (2003/04: 2.160p) per
share for 2004/05, which, subject to shareholder approval, is to be paid on 8 July 2005 to those shareholders on the register of members at close of business on 10 June 2005. Future distribution policy will continue to take account of earnings, cash flow, gearing and the needs of the business.
Liquidity and
capital resources
It is the objective of
the Group to be broadly cash flow neutral annually, subject to timing differences
and dividend payments, after implementing its 7% – 9% new store space growth
strategy in the US together with the continuing programme of store refurbishments
and relocations on both sides of the Atlantic. Factors which could affect this
objective would be if a business was acquired or the Group’s distribution
policy to shareholders changed.
The cash flow performance of the Group depends on a number of factors such as the:
| • | operating performance of the business, |
| • | rate of space expansion, which influences both fixed and working capital investment, |
| • | level of store refurbishment and relocations, |
| • | level of inventory investment, and |
| • | proportion of sales made on the in-house credit card and the average monthly collection rate of the credit balances. |
Investment in new space requires significant investment in working capital, as well as fixed capital investment, due to the slow inventory turn, and the additional investment required to fund sales in the US utilising the in-house credit card.
In years when the rate of new store space expansion in the US is towards the lower end of the planned 7% – 9% range, or the level of store refurbishment and relocation is below normal, the Group will have reduced levels of investment in fixed and working capital. In 2004/05 a faster rate of new store space growth in the US and an increased level of refurbishment in the UK, together with increased dividend payments and the purchase of shares to satisfy the exercise of share options, meant that cash flow was broadly neutral.
The Group’s working capital requirements fluctuate during the year as a result of the seasonal nature of its business. As inventory is purchased for the Christmas season there is a working capital outflow which reaches its highest levels in the late autumn. This position then reverses over the key selling period of November and December. The working capital needs of the business are then relatively stable from January to August. The timing of the payment of the final dividend, normally in July, is also material.
| 26 | Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 |
| 20-F | 29th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 29th |
|---|
The Board considers that the capital resources currently available are sufficient for both its present and near term requirements. The primary borrowing facilities are a $251 million securitisation against the US customer receivables which amortises between December 2005 and October 2006 and a $390 million unsecured multi-currency revolving credit facility which expires in September 2009. Further details of these and other facilities are given below.
In 2004/05 cash generated from operating activities amounted to £172.6 million (2003/04: £203.8 million), reflecting the funding of working capital investment. It is anticipated that in 2005/06 there will be a further increase in working capital due to planned store openings. Net financing costs of £9.8 million (2003/04: £11.0 million) and tax of £56.5 million (2003/04: £69.0 million) were paid. Cash flow before investing activities was £106.3 million (2003/04: £123.8 million).
Group capital expenditure was £70.5 million (2003/04: £50.9 million, £47.7 million at constant exchange rates). The level of capital expenditure was some 1.7 times the depreciation charge. Capital expenditure in 2005/06 is expected to be between £80 million and £90 million, most of which will be store related. Equity dividends of £43.8 million (2003/04: £36.7 million) were paid.
Net debt
Net debt at 29 January
2005 was £83.5 million (31 January 2004: £79.9 million, £73.9
million at constant exchange rates). Group gearing (net debt to shareholders’
funds) at the year end was 11.3% (31 January 2004: 11.8% restated). Under UK
GAAP, bank loans and overdrafts at 29 January 2005 include a $251.0 million
borrowing secured against the Group’s US customer receivables (31 January
2004: $251.0 million). Excluding this $251.0 million facility net cash was £49.3
million (31 January 2004: net cash £58.0 million).
The Company funds part of its private label credit card receivables programme through a privately placed receivables securitisation. Under this securitisation, interests in the US receivables portfolio, held by a trust were sold principally to institutional investors in the form of fixed-rate Class A, Class B and Class C investor certificates. The aggregate outstanding principal amount of the certificates totalled $251.0 million at 29 January 2005 and 6 April 2005. The certificates have a weighted average interest rate of 5.42% and interest is paid monthly in arrears from the finance charges collections generated by the receivables portfolio. The revolving period of the securitisation ends in December 2005, with a final expected principal payment date in November 2006.
In April 2004 the Group terminated its $70 million Conduit securitisation facility as it was no longer required.
On 28 September 2004 Signet entered into a $390 million unsecured multi-currency five year revolving credit facility agreement (the “Facility Agreement”). This replaced the $410 million facility that was due to expire in August 2006. The terms of the new facility are broadly similar to those of the facility being replaced, but with a reduction in loan margin pricing. Under the Facility Agreement, a syndicate of banks made facilities available to the Group in the form of multi-currency cash advances and sterling acceptance credits on, inter alia, the following terms:
| • | the Facility Agreement bears a maximum margin of 0.55% above LIBOR, though the margin may be lower dependent upon the performance of the Group. Since the commencement of the facility the margin has been 0.40% above LIBOR; and |
| • | the Facility Agreement is guaranteed by the Group’s principal holding and operating subsidiaries. |
The continued availability of the Facility Agreement is conditional upon the Group achieving certain financial performance criteria (see note 16 on page 84). It also has certain provisions which are customary for this type of agreement, including standard “negative pledge” and “pari passu” clauses. At 29 January 2005 and 6 April 2005 the amount outstanding under the Facility Agreement was $nil.
In July 1998 the Group entered into a $60 million unsecured seven year senior note issue (“Loan Note”), bearing a 7.25% fixed coupon. The Loan Note is also guaranteed by the Group’s principal holding and operating subsidiaries. The continued availability of the Loan Note is conditional upon the Group achieving certain financial performance criteria (see note 16 on page 84). The Loan Note also has certain provisions which are customary to this type of agreement, including standard “negative pledge” and “pari passu” clauses. At 29 January 2005 and 6 April 2005 the amount outstanding under the Loan Note was $15 million (31 January 2004: $30 million). It is anticipated that the outstanding balance of the Loan Note will be repaid in July 2005.
The principal financial covenants on each of these facilities are set out in note 16 on page 84.
It is the policy of the Group to enter into interest rate protection agreements in respect of at least 75% of its forecast US dollar borrowings. At 29 January 2005 the interest rate of forecast US dollar borrowings for 2005/06 was capped effectively at 5.5%.
| Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 | 27 |
| 20-F | 30th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 30th |
|---|
Financial review (continued)
Pensions
An actuarial valuation
of the UK defined benefit pension scheme the (“Group Scheme”) was
carried out at 5 April 2003. The market value of the Group Scheme’s assets
at that date was £82.2 million, a deficit of £6.7 million on the
Group Scheme’s accrued liabilities. As a result of the valuation the Group
has recommenced contributions to the Group Scheme which in 2004/05 amounted
to £3.7 million (2003/04: £1.2 million). It is anticipated that
the Group’s contribution in 2005/06 will be some £3.8 million. The
Group adopted FRS 17 – ‘Retirement Benefits’ in 2003/04 and the
FRS 17 valuation at 29 January 2005 showed a deficit in the Group Scheme of
£1.9 million (gross of deferred tax).
Contingent property
liabilities
Approximately 145 UK property
leases had been assigned by the Group up to 29 January 2005 (and remained unexpired
and occupied by assignees at that date) and approximately 35
additional properties were sub-let at that date. Should the assignees or sub-tenants fail to fulfil any obligations in respect of those leases or any other leases which have at any other time been assigned or sub-let, the Group or one of its UK subsidiaries may be liable for those defaults. The number of such claims arising to date has been small, and the liability, which is charged to the profit and loss account as it arises, has not been material.
Contractual
obligations
Long term debt comprises
borrowings with an original maturity of greater than one year. Purchase obligations
comprise contracts entered into for the forward purchase of gold and US dollars
with an original maturity of greater than one year. These contracts are taken
out to manage market risks. It is expected that operating commitments will be
funded from future operating cash flows and no additional facilities will be
required to meet these obligations.
| As at 29 January 2005 | ||||||||||
| Less than | Between one | Between three | More than | |||||||
| one year | and three years | and five years | five years | Total | ||||||
| £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | ||||||
| Long term debt obligations | 7.9 | 132.8 | – | – | 140.7 | |||||
| Operating lease obligations | 127.9 | 239.0 | 213.9 | 565.0 | 1,145.8 | |||||
| Purchase obligations | 9.8 | – | – | – | 9.8 | |||||
| Fixed interest and commitment fee payments | 7.8 | 6.1 | 0.2 | – | 14.1 | |||||
| Creditors falling due after one year | – | – | – | 12.3 | 12.3 | |||||
| |
||||||||||
| Total | 153.4 | 377.9 | 214.1 | 577.3 | 1,322.7 | |||||
| (1) | As at 29 January 2005 the Group has no outstanding floating rate indebtedness. |
| (2) | The Group expects to make pension contributions of some £3.8m to the Group Scheme in 2005/06. This has been excluded from the table as have obligations for subsequent years, as the level of future pensionable salaries and the future funding rate are yet to be determined. |
| 28 | Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 |
| 20-F | 31st "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 31st |
|---|
Impact of constant
exchange rates
The Group has historically
used constant exchange rates to compare period to period changes in certain
financial data. This is referred to as “at constant exchange rates”
throughout these accounts. The Group considers this to be a useful measure for
analysing and explaining changes and trends in the Group’s results. The impact of the recalculation of sales, operating profit, profit before tax, profit for the financial period, earnings per share and net debt at constant exchange rates, including a reconciliation to the Group’s GAAP results, is analysed below.
| Growth | 2003/04 at | Growth at | ||||||||||
| at actual | Impact of | constant | constant | |||||||||
| 2003/04 | exchange | exchange rate | exchange rates | exchange rates | ||||||||
| 2004/05 | as restated | (1) | rates | movement | (non-GAAP) | (non-GAAP) | ||||||
| £m | £m | % | £m | £m | % | |||||||
| Sales by origin and destination: | ||||||||||||
| UK | 514.4 | 501.0 | 2.7 | – | 501.0 | 2.7 | ||||||
| US | 1,100.0 | 1,103.9 | (0.4 | ) | (106.8 | ) | 997.1 | 10.3 | ||||
| |
|
|||||||||||
| 1,614.4 | 1,604.9 | 0.6 | (106.8 | ) | 1,498.1 | 7.8 | ||||||
| |
|
|||||||||||
| Operating profit: | ||||||||||||
| UK – Trading | 78.2 | 76.6 | 2.1 | – | 76.6 | 2.1 | ||||||
| – Group central costs | (6.6 | ) | (5.7 | ) | n/a | – | (5.7 | ) | n/a | |||
| |
|
|||||||||||
| 71.6 | 70.9 | 1.0 | – | 70.9 | 1.0 | |||||||
| US | 147.3 | 139.3 | 5.7 | (13.5 | ) | 125.8 | 17.1 | |||||
| |
|
|||||||||||
| 218.9 | 210.2 | 4.1 | (13.5 | ) | 196.7 | 11.3 | ||||||
| |
|
|||||||||||
| Profit before tax | 210.3 | 199.8 | 5.3 | (12.2 | ) | 187.6 | 12.1 | |||||
| |
|
|||||||||||
| Profit for the financial period | 141.2 | 129.6 | 9.0 | (7.8 | ) | 121.8 | 16.0 | |||||
| |
|
|||||||||||
| Earnings per share | 8.2p | 7.5p | 9.3 | (0.4p | ) | 7.1 | p | 15.5 | ||||
| |
|
|||||||||||
| Impact of | At constant | |||||||||||
| 29 January | 31 January | exchange rate | exchange rates | |||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | movement | (non-GAAP) | |||||||||
| £m | £m | £m | £m | |||||||||
| |
|
|||||||||||
| Net debt | (83.5 | ) | (79.9 | ) | 6.0 | (73.9 | ) | |||||
| |
|
|||||||||||
| (1) Restated for the implementation in 2004/05 of the amendment to FRS 5, ‘Application Note G – Revenue Recognition’ (see note 17). | ||||||||||||
| Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 | 29 |
| 20-F | 32nd "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 32nd |
|---|
Financial review (continued)
Prior
year review of the 52 weeks ended 31 January 2004
The results
for 2003/04 and 2002/03 have been restated for the amendment to FRS 5 in the
form of ‘Application Note G – Revenue Recognition‘ (see note
17). Total Group sales rose to £1,604.9 million (2002/03: £1,593.6
million), up 0.7% on a reported basis and 7.5% at constant exchange rates.
Group like
for like sales were up 4.9% and new space contributed 2.6%.
Group operating margin increased to 13.1% (2002/03: 12.5%), with leverage from like for like sales growth more than offsetting the impact of immature space growth with gross margin little changed. The growth in total sales and the increased operating margin resulted in Group operating profit advancing to £210.2 million (2002/03: £199.9 million), up 5.2% on a reported basis and 12.2% at constant exchange rates.
Net interest payable decreased to £10.4 million (2002/03: £14.0 million). £1.5 million of the reduction was due to exchange translation, the balance attributable to lower levels of net debt which more than offset the decrease in net interest credit on the UK defined benefit pension scheme.
Group profit before tax increased to £199.8 million (2002/03: £185.9 million), up 7.5% on a reported basis and 14.3% at constant exchange rates. After a tax charge of 35.1% (2002/03: 35.3%) profit for the financial period rose to £129.6 million (2002/03: £120.2 million). Earnings per share was 7.5p (2002/03: 7.0p), up 7.1% on a reported basis and 13.6% at constant exchange rates.
| 2003/04 sales growth | |||||||
| US % | UK % | Group % | |||||
| Like for like | 4.6 | 5.5 | 4.9 | ||||
| New space | 3.6 | 0.3 | 2.6 | ||||
| Exchange translation | (9.6 | ) | – | (6.8 | ) | ||
| Total sales growth | (1.4 | ) | 5.8 | 0.7 | |||
Sales
US
Like for like sales for
the US division increased by 4.6% and total US dollar sales by 8.2%. Trading
in the first half was adversely affected by the geo-political situation, however
the second half saw a marked improvement in the retail environment culminating
in a particularly strong fourth quarter when like for like sales rose by 7.2%.
The contribution from new space and the impact of exchange rate movements is
shown in the table above.
UK
As in the US, trading
in the first half of the year in the UK was also affected by geo-political factors,
but the second half saw improved trading with a strong Christmas season when
like for
like sales rose by 6.7%. For the year as a whole like for like sales increased by 5.5% and total sales by 5.8%.
Operating profit
US
The operating margin in
the US division was unchanged at 12.6% (2002/03: 12.6%), with the leverage from
like for like sales growth offsetting the impact of slightly lower gross margins
and immature store space. The ratio of net bad debt to sales decreased to 2.8%
(2002/03: 3.0%). Operating profit was £139.3 million (2002/03: £141.2
million), down 1.3% on a reported basis but up 8.3% at constant exchange rates
reflecting the movement in sales.
UK
An increase in gross margin
and leverage from improved store productivity meant that the UK operating margin
increased to 15.3% (2002/03: 13.7%). Operating profit grew by 18.4% to £76.6
million (2002/03: £64.7 million).
| Operating margin movement | ||||||||
| US % | UK % | Group % | ||||||
| 2002/03 margin | 12.6 | 13.7 | (1) | 12.5 | (1) | |||
| Gross margin | (0.7 | ) | 1.0 | (0.1 | ) | |||
| Expenses | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.9 | |||||
| New space | (0.3 | ) | – | (0.2 | ) | |||
| 2003/04 margin | 12.6 | 15.3 | 13.1 | |||||
| (1) Restated for the implementation of FRS 17 – ‘Retirement Benefits’. | ||||||||
Group costs
Group costs amounted to
£5.7 million (2002/03: £6.0 million which included a property provision
of £0.5 million).
Prior year adjustment
The Group adopted FRS
17 – ‘Retirement Benefits’ in 2003/04. Under the market-based
approach of FRS 17 there was a £6.7 million Group Scheme deficit at 1
February 2003 in comparison to a balance sheet asset of £19.1 million
under SSAP 24. Consequently a non-cash charge of £18.1 million, net of
deferred tax, was accounted for by way of a prior year adjustment charged directly
to reserves to reflect this change, representing 2.7% of shareholders’
funds at 1 February 2003.
Return on capital
employed
The Group’s ROCE
increased to 25.9% (2002/03: 25.0%). In the US the ROCE was 21.3% (2002/03:
21.9%) reflecting the impact of an increased proportion of immature space largely
from new Jared stores. In the UK there was an increase to 47.1% (2002/03: 41.2%)
due to improved store productivity. US capital employed included in-house credit
card debtors of £292.6 million at 31 January 2004 (2002/03: £299.2
million at 1 February 2003).
| 30 | Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 |
| 20-F | 33rd "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 33rd |
|---|
Depreciation
and capital expenditure
Depreciation charges
were £39.3 million (2002/03: £36.6 million): £23.6 million (2002/03: £24.1 million) in the US and £15.7 million (2002/03: £12.5 million) in the UK. Capital expenditure in the US was £33.1
million (2002/03: £33.1 million) and in the UK was £17.8 million (2002/03: £16.4 million).
Dividends
In November 2003 an interim
dividend of 0.341p per share was paid (2002/03: 0.310p). Additionally, a final
dividend of 2.160p (2002/03: 1.800p) per share for 2003/04 was paid on 2 July
2004 to those shareholders on the register of members at close of business on
4 June 2004.
Impact
of constant exchange rates
The Group has historically
used constant exchange rates to compare
period to period changes in certain financial data. This is referred
to as “at
constant exchange rates” throughout these accounts. The Group considers
this a useful measure for analysing and explaining changes and trends in the
Group’s results. The impact of the recalculation of sales, operating profit,
profit before tax and net income at constant exchange rates, including a reconciliation
to the Group’s GAAP results, is analysed below.
| Growth | 2002/03 at | Growth at | ||||||||||
| at actual | Impact of | constant | constant | |||||||||
| 2003/04 | 2002/03 | exchange | exchange rate | exchange rates | exchange rates | |||||||
| as restated | (1) | as restated | (1) | rates | movement | (non-GAAP | ) | (non-GAAP | ) | |||
| £m | £m | % | £m | £m | % | |||||||
| Sales by origin and destination: | ||||||||||||
| UK | 501.0 | 473.6 | 5.8 | – | 473.6 | 5.8 | ||||||
| US | 1,103.9 | 1,120.0 | (1.4 | ) | (100.0 | ) | 1,020.0 | 8.2 | ||||
| 1,604.9 | 1,593.6 | 0.7 | (100.0 | ) | 1,493.6 | 7.5 | ||||||
| Operating profit: | ||||||||||||
| UK – Trading | 76.6 | 64.7 | 18.4 | – | 64.7 | 18.4 | ||||||
| – Group central costs | (5.7 | ) | (6.0 | ) | n/a | – | (6.0 | ) | n/a | |||
| 70.9 | 58.7 | 20.8 | – | 58.7 | 20.8 | |||||||
| US | 139.3 | 141.2 | (1.3 | ) | (12.6 | ) | 128.6 | 8.3 | ||||
| 210.2 | 199.9 | 5.2 | (12.6 | ) | 187.3 | 12.2 | ||||||
| Profit before tax | 199.8 | 185.9 | 7.5 | (11.1 | ) | 174.8 | 14.3 | |||||
| Earnings per share | 7.5p | 7.0p | 7.1 | (0.4p | ) | 6.6p | 13.6 | |||||
| 31 January | Impact of | At constant | ||||||||||
| 1 February | exchange rate | exchange rates | ||||||||||
| 2004 | 2003 | movement | (non-GAAP) | |||||||||
| £m | £m | £m | £m | |||||||||
| Net debt | (79.9 | ) | (140.1 | ) | 17.5 | (122.6 | ) | |||||
| (1) Restated for the implementation in 2004/05 of the amendment to FRS 5, ‘Application Note G – Revenue Recognition’ (see note 17). | ||||||||||||
Critical accounting
policies
Critical accounting policies
covering areas of greater complexity or those particularly subject to the exercise
of judgement are listed below. There are no material off-balance sheet structures
under UK GAAP. The principal accounting policies are set out in note 1 on pages
72 to 75.
Revenue recognition
Following the adoption
in 2004/05 of the amendment to FRS 5, ’Reporting the substance of transactions’
in the form of ‘Application Note G – Revenue Recognition’, revenue
from the sale of extended service agreements in the US is now deferred and recognised,
net of incremental costs arising from the initial
| Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 | 31 |
| 20-F | 34th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 34th |
|---|
Financial review (continued)
sale in proportion to anticipated claims arising. This period is based on the historical claims experience of the US business, which has been consistent since these products were launched. The Group reviews the pattern of claims at the end of each year to determine any significant trends that may require changes to revenue recognition rates. The treatment of US extended service agreements is now the same under UK and US GAAP.
Stock valuation
Stock is valued on
a first-in, first-out basis and includes appropriate overheads. Overheads
allocated to inventory cost are only those directly related to bringing inventory
to its present location and condition. These include relevant warehousing,
distribution and certain buying, security and data processing costs.
Where necessary provision is made for obsolete, slow-moving and damaged stock. This provision represents the difference between the cost of the stock and its estimated market value, based upon stock turn rates, market conditions and trends in consumer demand. For further detail on the provisions for inventory and the amount of reserves recorded each year, refer to note 12 on page 83 in the notes to the accounts.
In the US stock losses are recognised at the mid-year and fiscal year end based on complete physical inventories. In the UK stock losses are recorded as identified on a perpetual inventory system and an estimate is made of losses for the period from the last stock count date to the end of the financial year on a store by store basis. These estimates are based on the overall divisional stock loss experience since the last stock count.
Foreign currency
translation
The results of overseas
subsidiary undertakings are translated into pounds sterling at the weighted
average rates of exchange, based on US sales, during the period and their
balance sheets and attributable goodwill at the rates at the balance sheet
date. Exchange differences arising from the translation of the net assets
and attributable goodwill of overseas subsidiary undertakings are charged
or credited to reserves. Other exchange differences arising from foreign
currency transactions are included in profit before taxation.
Depreciation
and impairment
Depreciation is provided
on freehold and long leasehold premises over a useful life not exceeding
50 years. Freehold land is not depreciated. Depreciation is provided on other
fixed assets at rates between 10% and 331 /3 %.
Shopfit depreciation rates have been set based on the refit cycle for each
store fascia and the useful lives of each individual element of the shopfit.
Tills and other IT equipment have separately determined depreciation rates.
In the UK, there are circumstances where scheduled refurbishments are carried out close to the end of the lease term, such that the expected life of the newly installed leasehold improvements will exceed the lease term. Where the renewal of the lease is reasonably assured, such shopfronts, fixtures and fittings are depreciated over a period equal to the lesser of their economic useful life, or the remaining lease term plus the period of reasonably assured renewal. Reasonable assurance is gained through evaluation of the right to enter into a new lease, the peformance of the store and potential availability of alternative sites.
Where appropriate, provision is made on assets that have a lower economic value than net book value. Additionally, potentially impaired assets are identified by reviewing the cash contribution of individual stores where trading since the initial opening of the store has reached a mature stage. Where such stores deliver a low or a negative cash contribution, the related store assets are considered for impairment by reference to the higher of net realisable value and value in use. The Group’s policy is only to reverse through the profit and loss account impairment losses arising because of changes in economic conditions or a change in the expected use of the asset. To date these have been immaterial.
Lease costs
and incentives
Operating lease costs
are charged to the profit and loss account as incurred. Predetermined rent
increases are recognised when they fall due, reflecting that these are generally
intended to compensate for the expected cost of inflation. Amounts payable
in respect of turnover leases are charged in the period to which the turnover
relates. Premiums paid to acquire short leasehold properties are amortised
over their lease period and incentives received relating to leased properties
are amortised over the period to the next rent review.
In accordance with FRS 12, where the Group has onerous lease obligations, provision is made for the discounted cash outflow that is expected to arise under the lease. Account is taken of any sublet income received or reasonably expected, incentives to be received or paid and the time to lease expiry or reversal of the net cash outflow, whichever is the later.
The Group policy is to recognise a provision for onerous leases when the leased property ceases to be used by the Group.
Receivables
Full provision is made
for debts that are 90 days past their due date on a recency basis. A provision
is also made based on the historic performance of the receivables portfolio.
The bad debt experience of the US division has been relatively stable over
the past five years at between 2.8% and 3.4% of sales.
| 32 | Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 |
| 20-F | 35th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 35th |
|---|
UK retirement
benefits
The surplus or deficit
on the Group Scheme that is charged to shareholders’ funds through the
Statement of Recognised Gains and Losses is subject to a number of assumptions
and uncertainties. A qualified actuary is engaged to calculate the expected
liabilities of the Group Scheme based on assumptions regarding salary and pension
increases, inflation rates, discount rates and the long term rate of return
expected on the
Group Scheme’s assets. Details of these assumptions are given in note 20
on page 88. The value of the assets of the Group Scheme is measured as at the
balance sheet date, this being particularly dependent on the value of equity
investments held by the Group Scheme at that date. However the impact on the
Group balance sheet is significantly mitigated as the members of the Group Scheme
are only in the UK and account for less than 12% of UK employees. The Group Scheme
closed to new members in
2004/05.
Advertising
and promotional costs
Advertising costs are
expensed as incurred. In accordance with the guidance issued in the US under
EITF 02-16, where vendor contributions are received in respect of identifiable
promotional events, these are matched against the costs of these promotions.
Vendor contributions that are received as general contributions and not against
specific promotional events are allocated against stock.
International
Financial Reporting Standards
Signet currently prepares
its primary financial statements under UK GAAP. For financial years commencing
on or after 1 January 2005 the Group is required to report in accordance
with International Accounting Standards (“IAS”) and IFRS as adopted
by the European Union. Therefore Signet will in future prepare its results
under IFRS, commencing with the 13 weeks to 30 April 2005. That announcement
will contain comparative information for the year ended 29 January 2005 prepared
under IFRS, which may continue to be revised and be subject to new interpretations.
Based on current expectations of the standards that the Group will need to
adopt, an overview of the principal changes from UK GAAP to IFRS to the accounts
for the year ended 29 January 2005 is set out below.
| Overview of impact in 2004/05 | |||||
| UK GAAP | IFRS | ||||
| £m | £m | ||||
| Sales | 1,614.4 | 1,606.1 | |||
| Operating profit | 218.9 | 212.5 | |||
| Profit on ordinary activities before tax | 210.3 | 203.9 | |||
| Profit for the financial period | 141.2 | 134.8 | |||
| Earnings per share | 8.2p | 7.8p | |||
| Net assets | 739.1 | 769.2 | |||
The most significant elements contributing to the change in financial information are:
| • | the inclusion of a charge for share-based payments, |
| • | the cessation of goodwill amortisation, |
| • | the timing of dividend recognition, |
| • | the disclosures relating to taxation, |
| • | the treatment of leases, and |
| • | revenue recognition. |
These changes have no impact on the Group’s historical or future net cash flow, the timing of cash received or the timing of payments.
Transitional
arrangements
The rules for the first
time adoption of IFRS are set out in IFRS 1 “First-time Adoption of
International Financial Reporting Standards”. In general a company is
required to determine its IFRS accounting policies and apply these retrospectively
to determine its opening balance sheet under IFRS. A number of exceptions
from retrospective application are allowed to assist companies in their transition
to reporting under IFRS. Where Signet has taken advantage of the exemptions
they are noted below.
Changes in
accounting policies
IFRS 2 Share-based
payments
In accordance with
IFRS 2, Signet has recognised a charge to income in respect of the fair value
of outstanding employee share options. The fair value has been calculated
using the binomial options valuation model and is charged to income over
the relevant option vesting period. The optional transitional arrangements,
which allow companies to apply IFRS 2 fully retrospectively to all options
granted but not fully vested at the relevant reporting date, have been used.
The operating profit impact in 2004/05 is a charge of £3.9 million.
IFRS 3 Business
combinations
IFRS 3 requires goodwill
to be carried at cost with impairment reviews both annually and when there
are indications that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Under the
transitional arrangements Signet will apply IFRS 3 prospectively from the
transition date. As a result, all prior business combination accounting is
frozen at the transition date of 31 January 2004, and the value of goodwill
is frozen, subject to exchange rate movements, at £16.8 million with
amortisation previously reported under UK GAAP for 2004/05 of £1.0
million not charged for the IFRS presentation.
| Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 | 33 |
| 20-F | 36th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st | Previous | Next | Bottom | Just 36th |
|---|
Financial review (continued)
IAS 10
Proposed dividend
Under IAS 10 a dividend
is not provided for until it is approved. As a result net assets are increased
by the amount of the final proposed dividend of £45.5 million.
IAS 12 Income
tax
The application of
IAS 12 results in the separate disclosure of deferred tax assets and liabilities
on the Group’s balance sheet. Opening balance sheet adjustments will
be made to reclassify these assets and liabilities.
IAS 17 leasing
IAS 17 requires that
where operating leases include clauses in respect of predetermined rent increases,
those rents are charged to the profit and loss account on a straight line
basis over the lease term, including any construction period or other rental
holiday. Such lease clauses are commonly found in the US and will result
in an acceleration of lease charges for accounting purposes from the later
to the earlier years of the lease term. In addition, Standard Interpretations
Committee (“SIC”) 15 requires inducements to enter into a lease
to be recognised over the lease term rather than over the period to the next
rent review as under UK GAAP.
These result in an additional charge to the profit and loss account of £3.5 million and a decrease in net assets of £17.9 million before deferred tax. There is no impact on cash flows.
| Reconciliation
of UK GAAP sales and profit before tax to IFRS sales and profit before tax for the 52 weeks ended 29 January 2005 |
|||||
| Profit | |||||
| before | |||||
| Sales | tax | ||||
| £m | £m | ||||
| As reported in accordance with UK GAAP | 1,614.4 | 210.3 | |||
| Principal accounting adjustments: | |||||
| Share-based payments | – | (3.9 | ) | ||
| Goodwill amortisation | – | 1.0 | |||
| Leases | – | (3.5 | ) | ||
| Principal presentational adjustments: | |||||
| US insurance income | 10.4 | – | |||
| Voucher promotions | (12.0 | ) | – | ||
| UK warranty sales | (6.7 | ) | – | ||
| Proposed reporting in accordance with IFRS | 1,606.1 | 203.9 | |||
IAS
18 Revenue
recognition
IAS
18 requires that revenue is only recognised when all significant risks of ownership
have been transferred to the buyer. There is no impact on profit before tax
for
2004/05 although net assets
are reduced by £6.0 million before deferred tax.
There are a number of other presentational changes that do not have an impact on the profit or net assets of the Group. Insurance income and voucher promotions in the US and only the commission element of warranty sales in the UK, will be recognised in sales. Interest receivable from the US in-house credit programme will be classified as other operating income.
IAS 32 and
IAS 39 Financial instruments
The Group has taken
the exemption not to restate comparatives for IAS 32 ‘Financial Instruments:
Disclosure and Presentation’ and IAS 39 ‘Financial Instruments:
Recognition and Measurement’. As a result, the comparative information
in the 2005/06 accounts will be presented on the existing UK GAAP basis.
IAS 32 and IAS 39 will apply from the start of the financial year ending
28 January 2006. The Group intends to apply the hedge accounting provisions
of IAS 39 as they relate to forward currency and commodity contracts to the
extent practically and economically appropriate in order to minimise future
volatility arising from its implementation.
| Reconciliation
of UK GAAP net assets to IFRS net assets at 29 January 2005 |
|||
| Net | |||
| assets | |||
| £m | |||
| As reported in accordance with UK GAAP | 739.1 | ||
| Principal adjustments: | |||
| Share-based payments | – | ||
| Goodwill amortisation | 1.0 | ||
| Leases | (17.9 | ) | |
| Revenue recognition | (6.0 | ) | |
| Deferred taxation | 7.5 | ||
| Dividend recognition | 45.5 | ||
| Proposed reporting in accordance with IFRS | 769.2 | ||
| 34 | Signet Group plc Annual Report & Accounts year ended 29 January 2005 |
| 20-F | 37th "Page" of 144 | TOC | 1st |
|---|