SEC Info  
  Home     Search     My Interests     Help     Sign In     Please Sign In  

Performance Technologies Inc/DE · 10-K · For 12/31/02

Filed On 3/28/03 5:20pm ET   ·   SEC File 0-27460   ·   Accession Number 1003950-3-5

  in   Show  and 
  As Of               Filer                 Filing     As/For/On Docs:Pgs

 3/28/03  Performance Technologies Inc/DE   10-K       12/31/02    1:67

Annual Report   ·   Form 10-K
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: 10-K        Annual Report                                         67±   343K 


Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page
3Item 1. Business
"Risk Factors
"Design Wins
"Item 2 -. Properties
"Item 3 -. Legal Proceedings
"Item 4 -. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
"Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
4Equity Plan Information
"Item 6 -. Selected Financial Data
5Item 7 -. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
"Equity in loss of unconsolidated company, net of tax
"Item 7A -. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
"Item 8 -. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
14Item 9 -. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
"Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
"Item 11. Executive Compensation
"Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
"Item 13 -. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
"Item 14 -. Controls and Procedures
"Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
10-K1st "Page" of 25TOCTopPreviousNextBottomJust 1st
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 ------------------- FORM 10-K (Mark One) [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (No Fee Required) For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2002 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (No Fee Required) For the transition period from to Commission File Number 0-27460 PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) ------------------ Delaware 16-1158413 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation of (I.R.S. Employer organization) Identification No.) 205 Indigo Creek Drive, Rochester, New York 14626 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (585) 256-0200 --------------------------- Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act: NONE ------------------------ Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: COMMON STOCK, par value $.01 per share (Title of Class) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]. Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [ X ] The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the close of business on June 28, 2002 was approximately $64,916,000. The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's Common Stock, $.01 par value, was approximately 12,230,000 as of February 28, 2003. Documents Incorporated by Reference The information called for by Item 10-13 of Part III is incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held June 3, 2003, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after December 31, 2002.
10-K2nd "Page" of 25TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 2nd
Performance Technologies, Incorporated Index to Annual Report on Form 10-K PART I Page ITEM 1 Business 1 ITEM 2 Properties 11 ITEM 3 Legal Proceedings 11 ITEM 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 11 PART II ITEM 5 Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters 11 ITEM 6 Selected Financial Data 12 ITEM 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 13 ITEM 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 20 ITEM 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 20 ITEM 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 34 PART III ITEM 10 Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 34 ITEM 11 Executive Compensation 34 ITEM 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management 35 ITEM 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 35 ITEM 14 Controls and Procedures 35 PART IV ITEM 15 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K 35
10-K3rd "Page" of 25TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 3rd
PART 1 ITEM 1 - Business Overview Performance Technologies (the "Company") is a supplier of embedded computing products and system-level solutions that can be used in a broad range of applications and end markets. Since its founding in 1981 as a Delaware corporation, the Company has consistently designed innovative embedded products and system solutions that focus on attributes such as reduced time-to-market for our customers, enhanced performance, high availability and cost advantages for a user base that includes communications, military and commercial applications. The Company has a proven history of successfully adapting its products and services to a constantly changing, technology-driven marketplace through the course of several business cycles that have occurred since its founding. The Company's annual operating performance is subject to various risks and uncertainties. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere herein, as well as the section appearing in ITEM 1 of this Form 10-K under the heading "Risk Factors." The Company's future operating results may be affected by various trends and factors which are beyond the Company's control. These risks and uncertainties include, among other factors, general business and economic conditions, rapid or unexpected changes in technologies, cancellations or delays of customer orders including those associated with "design wins," changes in the product or customer mix of sales, delays in new product development, customer acceptance of new products and customer delays in qualification of products. Important Year 2002 Milestones 2002 was a challenging year with continuing erosion in the general business environment, as well as the Company's target markets. Management responded to these demanding market conditions through a series of initiatives that allowed the Company to maintain profitability. As the organization entered 2002, it was clear that the traditional users of the Company's products, primarily telecommunication equipment manufacturing organizations, were continuing to suffer from a drastic reduction in capital equipment spending by operators in North America and Europe. It was also clear that many of the market's forward-looking initiatives related to next-generation network infrastructure deployment, both in the wireline and wireless areas, had stalled due to a lack of visibility of an economic recovery. Ongoing expenditures in the telecommunications industry were generally being limited to maintenance items, with little attention being paid to network expansion and the use of new technologies similar to those offered by the Company. Other end markets for embedded systems also experienced slowdowns in business during 2002. However, an encouraging perspective is that certain industries that use the Company's embedded products and systems appear to have shown signs of stabilization by year-end. Throughout 2002, most equipment providers that are customers for the Company's products responded to the economic conditions by implementing cost controls, reducing workforces and realigning their business models. This restructuring, which occurred in both 2001 and 2002, has dramatically reduced the engineering capabilities of many of these companies and is expected to result in a greater reliance on organizations such as Performance Technologies for "standards-based" platforms and components to be integrated with their next-generation products. It is expected that outsourcing of equipment and services, such as those provided by the Company will result in these companies establishing strategic relationships with fewer vendors who can supply larger parts of their embedded system platform requirements. During 2002, many of the Company's peers that sell products into the embedded systems marketplace experienced significant revenue declines and operating losses. Almost all have undergone the same kinds of restructuring as their customers by consolidating operations and shedding unprofitable operations. In the face of such a demanding economic climate, management targeted a number of initiatives and objectives to reposition the Company to operate more successfully in these conditions and emerge as a strong leader in its markets as conditions improve. These initiatives included: 1) Selective Reductions in the Company's Cost Structure: This action was carried out at two different times during 2002 in response to deteriorating conditions by reducing its workforce by approximately 20% and by consolidating the Raleigh, North Carolina engineering operations into the Ottawa, Canada Signaling Group. These reductions allowed the Company to remain viable and profitable. While the Company's financial performance for 2002 relative to prior years was disappointing, the Company performed very well compared to its peer group. It remained profitable and ended the year with a positive revenue growth trend and a noteworthy improvement in the year-end backlog. 2) Aggressive Use of the Company's Balance Sheet Strength for Acquisitions and Investments: In the current environment, valuations have been substantially reduced in comparison to several years ago. This offers the Company an ongoing opportunity to acquire products, technologies and organizations that were unavailable during that period. In 2002, the Company successfully carried out one major acquisition and concluded a strategic minority investment in an early stage company. These two events were: Ziatech Acquisition: In October 2002, the Company completed its acquisition of Intel Corporation's Embedded Communications Platform Division (formerly Ziatech Corporation). The acquisition more than doubled the Company's total available market in the embedded systems space through the addition of highly complementary computing and systems products. Due to overall industry downsizing, as noted above, equipment manufacturers and integrators are looking to establish strategic relationships with fewer vendors. This acquisition allows the Company to immediately offer a broader range of products to a wider set of embedded applications in the data communications, tele- communications, military, industrial automation and transportation markets. (Details are set forth in the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission). Momentum Computer Investment: In September 2002, the Company completed an agreement to invest $1.5 million for a 47% interest in Momentum Computer, Inc., a developer of specialized single board computer solutions for the data communications, telecommunications, military and aerospace markets. The Company also loaned Momentum $1.0 million to be used for working capital requirements. Management believes Momentum fills an important need in the embedded platform market by offering a "quick turn" design and delivery capability for custom processor and high performance I/O embedded products. Momentum's product line is closely aligned, but does not compete with the Company's existing embedded switch, access, signaling and Intel-based single board computer products. In late 2002, the Board of Directors initiated a review of the specific alternatives to improve stockholder value in the current business and market conditions. An area that offered opportunities was a more dedicated effort in searching for technologies and acquisitions that could be added to the Company to enhance future growth. In early 2003, the Chairman of the Board of Directors joined the management staff as Chief Strategic Officer to pursue these initiatives on a dedicated full-time basis. 3) Broaden Market and Product Focus: In the recent past, the Company targeted its component and software products at the data communications market. With the expansion of telecommunications in the late 1990's, many Performance Technologies products were optimized for use in embedded telecommunications platforms. As the Company entered 2002, management initiated efforts to broaden the market and product focus of the organization to become less dependent on near-term growth in the telecommunications arena. In many instances, this required minimal product modification, in both hardware and software, and a redirection of the sales and marketing programs. In addition to redirecting efforts related to existing products, the acquisition of Ziatech and the investment in Momentum accomplished an immediate broadening of the Company's product offering and effective market coverage into end application areas such as military, industrial automation and transportation. 4) Continued New Product Development: The Company continued an aggressive posture with respect to funding new product development during 2002, relative to the soft business conditions. As the business cycle runs its course and in anticipation of improved conditions, it is management's objective for the Company to be well positioned with a strong and contemporary product portfolio that will provide opportunities for accelerated growth. In carrying out this initiative, the Company continued to develop new and innovative products during the year, including: Gigabit Embedded Ethernet Switch: In March 2002, the Company extended its IPnexus(TM) switching product line to include the first embedded gigabit Ethernet switch. This product began shipping in the third quarter and there was a noteworthy backlog of orders for gigabit switches at year-end. In early 2003, the Company began taking evaluation orders for a beta version of a new product that offers network routing capabilities important to enhanced speed and security in data networks. Network Processing Modules: In late 2002, the Company introduced the first in a family of network processor modules as an extension to Performance Technologies' industry leading IPnexus embedded switching products. Trade named FlexNAT(TM), (Flexible Network Address Translation), it is the first and only embedded Ethernet solution to enable integrated high-speed network data packet processing and gigabit Ethernet switching. Management expects the network processing products and the associated software development investment made by the organization during 2002, will form the base technology for a variety of products the Company will introduce throughout 2003 and 2004. Expanded Network Access Products: During 2002, the Company continued to expand its line of network access products by moving existing designs to a broader set of standards often found in a variety of enterprise servers for applications beyond the typical embedded markets. During 2002, the Company focused on expanding its communications software family marketed under the trade name NexusWare(TM) to improve product coverage and ease of use. This software family is based on the Linux operating system, which is rapidly growing in popularity. Management believes the features provided by NexusWare offer distinct user advantages unmatched by competitive offerings. This continued enhancement of the Company's broad and recognized communications and network software capability generates higher margins than similar competitive products offered for embedded market applications. 3000 Series Signaling Gateway: Early in 2002, the Company introduced the 3000 Series Signaling Gateway, a small, full-featured SS7/IP inter-networking device for use in current telephony applications. The 3000 Gateway is specifically targeted at telecommunications operators who can use IP networks to reduce the cost of existing wireline and wireless networks without extensive investments in overhauling the existing network infrastructure. Industry Overview As the economic downturn continued throughout 2002, equipment suppliers that utilize "standards based" embedded technology (the Company's customer base) responded by implementing cost controls, cutting engineering workforces and realigning their business models. Such restructuring has created a more concentrated supplier landscape for 2003 that is better able to adapt to a fluctuating market. It is not just the equipment vendors who are readjusting. Across the technology sector, equipment developers and integrators who have recently downsized are looking to do more outsourcing of equipment and services and ultimately establish more strategic relationships with fewer vendors. The Company supplies technology products that are incorporated into open standards-based embedded systems. These systems are specifically configured using various hardware and software, often from multiple suppliers, to meet a variety of end applications found in market segments such as telecommunications infrastructure, data communications infrastructure, military, or industrial systems. The embedded systems market is estimated to be over $3.0 billion in size, worldwide. Traditionally, a large segment of this market has used proprietary, purpose-built embedded systems and products. Embedded systems built on "open standard designs" comprise a smaller segment of this market. While proprietary systems are expected to continue to dominate this market in the future, a noteworthy growing share of embedded systems being implemented are expected to use "open standards." The driving factors behind this changing paradigm are twofold. First, systems are becoming increasingly more complex, requiring larger investments and longer lead times to design. Second, as organizations have downsized, they simply do not have the necessary staff to carry out extensive new product development while successfully meeting the competitive pressures of "time to market" found in most technology businesses. Due to these changes, equipment suppliers are relying on companies such as Performance Technologies to deliver major building blocks or complete platforms, allowing the supplier to "layer on" their "value add." This can be software and/or additional hardware elements directed at specific applications. In addition, the current environment, which has forced the downsizing of many engineering and development resources, has also forced reductions in purchasing, logistics and supply groups. Under these circumstances, many customers are anxious to limit the number of suppliers, forming more strategic relationships with organizations that have broader capabilities. Management believes that the added capability resulting from the acquisition of Ziatech in late 2002 ideally positions the Company to service these evolving market needs and opportunities. The acquisition more than doubled the Company's total available market in the embedded systems space through the addition of key computing and systems products. This allows the Company to offer a broader range of products and embedded systems platforms to a customer base that is seeking fewer suppliers and a higher level of integrated solutions. During 2002, the Company continued its involvement in promoting and supplying embedded products based on the contemporary use of networking technology as an integral element of the system design. This new and forward looking approach to building embedded systems was created by Performance Technologies engineers and has earned the Company a leading position in the industry when this innovative concept was standardized and widely adopted as the next-generation benchmark. This standard is known in the industry as the PICMG 2.16 specification and applies the concepts developed for enterprise Ethernet networks to embedded system design. While the sluggish economy has slowed the deployment of equipment built to this standard, there is widespread adoption of the concept, and many embedded system suppliers have incorporated this standard into their next-generation products. Central to this new system architecture is the use of an embedded Ethernet switch and Ethernet technology for communication between the blades in a system, rather than older technologies such as PCI. In support of this new system concept, the Company has aggressively developed a comprehensive line of embedded Ethernet switches over the past three years. If the economic environment had been more stable, management believes that the demand for these products would have been significantly stronger. Nevertheless, in the current environment, while most product revenues have been flat or declining, the Company's Ethernet switches have had noteworthy adoption among major customers and have actually shown continuing quarter-over-quarter growth. However, throughout 2002, there were only limited signs that any of the numerous "design wins" that management attributes to this product have actually reached full-scale deployment. There are customer indications that this may start to change over the course of 2003. There is also growing market evidence that some early competitors have relinquished the space to the Company based on our comprehensive product offering and aggressive development program in this area. It is management's belief that the Company is in a leading market position with its embedded switching technology and that this product family will provide substantial growth when the economic cycle improves. Market intelligence organizations, such as the Dell'Oro Group, suggest that revenues in 2003, in networking switches and routers throughout the industry are projected to be down 7.5% and 25%, respectively. However, the Ethernet switch market, which is aligned with the Company's products, is expected to grow 3.0% this year. According to Dataquest, Ethernet switch revenue totaled $2.9 billion in the third quarter of 2002, a 1.3% increase from the same period in 2001. While the use of Ethernet switches in embedded systems is a specialized market segment, the forecasted growth in this market area validates the viability of the new embedded system architecture developed by the Company. On a broader but related market observation, management expects the telecommunications sector to continue to struggle in 2003 and has responded by adjusting its focus on healthier markets in the near term such as selected commercial, military and industrial applications. However, there are indications that certain regions/sectors in the telecommunications market will continue to be acquiring next-generation equipment this year. For example, the wireless market is expected to be a sustaining factor in the industry, and Aberdeen is predicting wireless data services in the form of wireless LAN (WLAN) will be among the most successful applications for telecommunications in 2003, addressing three distinct markets: enterprises, residences and public hot spots, such as airports. Also, telecommunications as a whole is demonstrating impressive growth in the Asia-Pacific region. While telecommunications equipment manufacturers and operators in the United States and Europe continue to report declining revenue and losses, Asian operators and equipment manufacturers, such as NTT, Huawei, Samsung, LG and UTStarcom, are continuing to show strength. According to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the number of telephone subscribers in the Asia-Pacific region in 2002 (both fixed and mobile) accounted for 36 percent of the worldwide total. Ten years earlier, the region accounted for less than 22 percent. This region has added more than one telephone user every second for the last decade. Mobile phone growth in the Asia-Pacific region is also continuing to grow, and future networks in this region will no doubt be IP-based because of its low price point and ease of implementation. The Company's focus on products that support IP networks suggests that this is a geographic area where there will be new opportunities, while the telecommunications markets in North America and Europe slowly move through a more lengthy recovery process. Strategy The Company has a proven history of successfully adapting its products, services and organization to a constantly changing technology-driven marketplace. This adaptation has been demonstrated through the course of several business cycles that have occurred since its founding in 1981. With the Ziatech acquisition in October 2002, the Company substantially broadened both its product offering and market coverage to include additional computing and system products that can be effectively supplied to a market that is twice the size of that which was available to the Company prior to the acquisition. Following the acquisition, a new corporate strategy was defined that integrates the Company's technological innovation and product breadth. The organization's new business strategy emphasizes its expanded capability to offer a "unified" solution to the customer base including software, hardware and system platforms through a single Performance Technologies offering. This new strategy broadens the Company's market focus to more effectively address embedded system requirements for communications, military and commercial applications. The Company's product strategies for 2003 are to effectively expand the Company's traditional focus of supplying embedded technology components, such as access and switching products, to supplying "comprehensive" embedded system platforms incorporating multiple components from the Company's product portfolio. Four initiatives have been identified to carry out the 2003 strategy: Target the Company's Products to a Wider Set of Embedded System Applications: Appropriate investments are being made to assure the necessary product features and services that will be required to broaden the customer base in a variety of promising market segments outside of the Company's traditional telecommunication focus. Continue Development of Innovative, Packet-based IP Technology for Use in Embedded Systems: It is management's intent to leverage the demonstrated technical innovation of both the traditional Performance Technologies engineering staff and the newly acquired engineering talent of the former Ziatech organization. Both have impressive histories of embedded product and systems innovation. Extend the Company's Significant Suite of Value-add Software: Performance Technologies has comprehensive software capability in a variety of areas. Management's objective during 2003 is to make the necessary investments to extend this umbrella to include the Ziatech computing and systems products which traditionally have had lower margins than the Company's other products. Increase Market Awareness of the Company's New Capabilities: Leveraging the Ziatech acquisition, management believes the combined organization has the fundamental elements to become a premier embedded systems provider. An aggressive 2003 sales and marketing program is being carried out to assure awareness of this in the marketplace. Certainly, there are identifiable risks associated with carrying out the Company's new corporate and product strategies in the current economic climate. Since many of the Company's end markets are forecast to show little or no growth, in order to realize growth in this environment, the Company will have to take market share from competitors. However, management believes that based on its review and analysis of the marketplace and the Company's product portfolio that has numerous strengths, this investment and its associated risk are worthwhile. If successful, management believes these initiatives will effectively reposition the organization as an important strategic partner with many of its customers, thereby increasing their utilization of the Company's broadened product capabilities. When the business cycle starts to show improvement, it is further expected that these 2003 initiatives can yield significant rewards by accelerating revenue growth and profitability. To effectively implement this growth strategy, management expects to selectively add to investments in marketing and sales, while sustaining aggressive engineering development programs during 2003. The Company has a proven track record of profitable operations, however in the near term, these initiatives could result in a loss posture for 2003 if revenues do not grow sufficiently during the year. The acquisition and initial integration of the Ziatech organization during 2002 has changed the fundamental landscape of opportunity for the Company. In order to continue this momentum, in January 2003, the Board of Directors expanded the executive management team by adding a Chief Strategic Officer to identify and facilitate additional acquisition opportunities, business and technology investments that can accelerate the Company's growth and associated shareholder value. Products The Company's products and solutions are based on open-system architectures that include individual system elements, system platforms, single board computers and software. With embedded solutions for both existing and emerging networks, the Company serves as a single source vendor for companies involved with industrial, military, commercial, data communications and telecommunications applications. The Company markets it embedded products under four general groups. These are: IPnexus Switching Products IPnexus Access Products and NexusWare(TM) Software Ziatech Single Board Computer and Chassis Products SEGway(TM) SS7/IP Signaling Products IPnexus Switching Products. The Company's IPnexus Switching products operate in the new CompactPCI systems architecture referred to as PICMG 2.16. This is an embedded systems architecture that was developed by the Company and allows the many techniques, features and advantages that were developed for enterprise "client-server networks," to be applied to embedded system platforms. This innovative approach to building these systems uses a specialized Ethernet switch as the "keystone" of the architecture. This architecture has distinct cost advantages allowing developers of next-generation systems to reduce design complexity while increasing overall system reliability and performance. Based on these clear-cut attributes, the adoption of this standard has occurred at a record rate among embedded system suppliers and manufacturers to a wide variety of industries. As part of the Company's initiative in creating the PICMG 2.16 standard, engineering undertook an aggressive development program aimed at becoming the premier supplier of embedded Ethernet switches. The Company's IPnexus switching products offer a comprehensive family that ranges from low cost, limited speed to unique higher-end gigabit switches, the latter introduced in 2002. Management believes that there is substantial pent-up demand for the Company's switching products based on the number of "design wins" that the Company has realized over the past twenty-four months. In general, there has been a delay in "design wins" moving to a production/deployment status based on the soft business conditions. However, management expects a number of these "design wins" to ultimately achieve volume order rates as the economy improves and capital spending rebounds. Based on this scenario, the embedded Ethernet switching product family could be an important growth driver for the Company. IPnexus Access Products. The Company's IPnexus Access products are available in a number of formats that operate in a broad range of data communications and telecommunications applications. Performance Technologies' access products provide a connection between a variety of network interfaces and embedded systems platforms that are used to control the network and/or process information being transported over networks. This product family includes stand-alone communication servers and embedded access products that operate as part of systems based on the PCIbus standard, the CompactPCI (cPCI) standard and the new PICMG 2.16 standard. An important element in the Company's access product group is the extensive communications software products that can be licensed to customers for a variety of applications. This capability includes: standard communication packages such as X.25 and Frame Relay, specialized software that supports such applications as radar protocols used in weather tracking and air traffic control, and SS7 signaling software. During 2002, the Company introduced its NexusWare software suite. This software package includes a comprehensive Linux-based development environment and fully functional runtime software that is supplied with each system. NexusWare is intended for system engineers using IPnexus Access products to facilitate rapid integration and development of packet-based embedded systems. NexusWare is designed to raise the level at which system integration is performed, giving developers a simplified path to designing comprehensive IPnexus system solutions. This software package is continually being enhanced and will be extended to include the newly acquired Ziatech computing products. Management believes these software tools and products are an important element in assisting customers to do product integration. This software also generates additional software license revenue for the Company. The Company's IPnexus products include embedded Ethernet switches, network access products and SS7 signaling blades. Announced customers for IPnexus products include: ADC Telecommunications, Inc., ADLINK Technology, Inc., Agilent Technologies, Alcatel SA, APW/Electronic Solutions, AudioCodes, Boeing Australia Limited, Cognitronics Corporation, HP/Compaq Corporation, General Dynamics, Kaparel, Lucent Technologies, Motorola Corporation, net.com, Nortel Networks, Northrup Grumman Information Technology, Optibase, Ltd., Raytheon, Siemens AG, Siemens Carrier Networks LLC, Soma Networks and Sun Microsystems. Ziatech Computing and Platform Products. The addition of the Ziatech products to the product line in October 2002 significantly expanded the Company's target markets, enabling it to offer a more comprehensive solution to an array of companies in the data communications, telecommunications, industrial automation, medical and homeland defense. As the original developer of the widely deployed CompactPCI system standard, Ziatech has always been a market leader and a driving force behind standards-based innovation for the embedded market sector. In addition, Ziatech had developed a range of PICMG 2.16 products that complement the product offerings already being sold by the Company. The Ziatech computing products provide a complete range of Intel-based single board computers that can be applied to a broad range of applications. In addition to the range of single board computers, the Company now offers a variety of embedded system chassis and associated chassis management products. This expanded capability allows Performance Technologies to provide comprehensive embedded system platforms incorporating multiple components from the Company's portfolio. Announced customers for the Ziatech Products include: Analogic, Copper Mountain Networks, Laurel Networks, Lucent Technologies, Marconi, Nortel Networks and Soma Networks. SEGway SS7 IP Signaling Products. The Company's SEGway products are used to interconnect traditional telephone networks with the growing packet-switched (IP) network architectures of today. Performance Technologies SEGway signaling products also reliably transport, concentrate and route SS7 messages between SS7 and IP entities. In 2001, the Company introduced a product that allowed traditional SS7 messages to be reliably transported over IP networks. One of the first applications for this technology was the transport of SS7 signals over the Internet, allowing secondary GSM cellular/mobile markets to be added to the roaming footprint of a group of European wireless operators. The Company has since expanded that capability to allow economical replacement/expansion of traditional SS7 networks over IP networks, at a substantially reduced cost in a variety of applications. While the reduced capital equipment spending in the telecommunications markets has slowed deployment of these products, there are continued market indications that the concept is attractive to telecommunications operators and will grow as the spending rebounds in this market. The Company also provides carrier-grade SS7 and SS7/IP networking solutions for GSM wireless roaming applications with deployments in over 35 countries worldwide. The Company's SEGway products include SS7 network replacement products, SS7/IP products and the GSM SS7 signaling platform. Announced customers for the SEGway products include: Alcatel SA, Comfone AG, Ericsson Telecommunications, iBasis Inc., Motorola Corporation, Nortel Networks, Swisscom AG, Telefonica Moviles Espana, Teleglobe and TSI Telecommunications Services. Sales, Marketing and Distribution The Company markets its products worldwide to a spectrum of customers through its direct sales force and various channels including Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), Value Added Resellers (VARs), distributors and systems integrators. Almost all of the Company's North American business is sold through the Company's direct sales force. Due to the highly technical nature of the Company's products, it is essential that the Company's salespeople are technically oriented and are knowledgeable in the embedded systems, networking and communications fields. To supplement its sales force, the Company has field application engineers who assist prospective customers in determining if the Company's products will meet their requirements. Currently, 32 sales, marketing and sales support personnel are located in the Company's Rochester, New York, Connecticut, California (2), Ottawa, Canada and the United Kingdom offices. In addition, independent sales representatives and agents cover selected geographic areas nationally and internationally; and distributors or integrators, handling selected products, supplement the Company's direct sales team on a worldwide basis. The Company executes various ongoing marketing strategies designed to attract new OEM and end-user customers and to stimulate additional purchases from existing customers. These strategies include direct mail and email campaigns, direct telemarketing, special pricing programs, active participation in technical standards groups, participation in national, international and regional trade shows, selected trade press advertisements and technical articles, and an active campaign to direct potential customers to the Company's Web site. Sales to customers outside of North America represented 25%, 27% and 30% of the Company's revenue in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The Company's products are currently sold by the Company's direct sales force and by international distributors throughout the more industrialized countries in Europe and in Asia. International sales are subject to import and export controls, transportation delays and interruptions, foreign currency exchange rates, and foreign governmental regulations. Payments for shipments from the United States to outside the United States are generally made in U.S. dollars and payments for shipments from Canada to Canada are generally made in Canadian dollars. Customers The Company has over 50 active customers worldwide, primarily in the telecommunications and embedded systems markets. Many of the Company's major customers are Fortune 500 companies in the United States or of similar stature in Europe and Asia. In 2002, the largest single customer (Lucent Technologies) represented 9% of revenue, and the four largest customers (Lucent Technologies, Teleglobe, HP/Compaq Computer and UTStarcom) represented 28% of the Company's revenue. At year-end 2002, approximately 70% of the Company's customers are in the telecommunications industry and the Company's products are generally integrated into products for wireline, wireless and next-generation IP network infrastructure. These products are targeted at customers in the following sectors: telecommunication equipment manufacturers, telecommunications service providers and operators, international wireless carriers and platform manufacturers. The Company's other customers represent a range of industries utilizing open-architecture embedded systems. Due to the addition of the Ziatech product line and the current weakness in the telecommunications industry, the Company is focusing more marketing and sales emphasis on the overall embedded systems market than in recent years. Backlog At January 31, 2003, the scheduled backlog of orders was $8.4 million, compared to $3.2 million at February 10, 2002. A substantial portion of the Company's revenue in each quarter results from orders placed within the quarter and shipped in the final month of the quarter. Orders are subject to cancellation in the normal course of business; however, historically, the Company has filled most of its firm orders. (See Management's Discussion & Analysis included elsewhere in this report). Seasonality The Company's business is not generally subject to large seasonal swings. Much of the Company's business is project-related, driven by customer demand, which can cause quarterly fluctuations in revenue. Environmental Matters The Company does not believe that compliance with federal, state or local laws or regulations relating to the protection of the environment have any material effect on its capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position. Competition The acquisition of the Ziatech product line in 2002 enabled the Company to reposition itself from being an embedded components supplier to supplying comprehensive embedded systems, incorporating these components. This added product capability increased the Company's addressable markets and altered the Company's competitive landscape. The embedded systems market continues to be characterized by rapid technological innovations resulting in new product introductions and frequent advances in price/performance ratios. Competitive factors in this market include product performance, functionality, product quality and reliability, customer service and support, marketing capability, corporate reputation and brand recognition, and changes in relative price/performance ratios. For computing and platform products, the Company faces a group of competitors including Motorola Computer Group, Force Computers, Radisys Corporation and SBS Technologies. These competitors are split into two categories: the full systems suppliers noted above, and technology component suppliers offering either computing components or platforms. Management believes that computing products is the cornerstone of the embedded systems market, and product functionality and quality, time-to-market and price/performance are key factors to winning new accounts. The Company's first embedded IP Ethernet switch products were introduced to the embedded systems market in 2000 and the first PICMG 2.16 compliant models were introduced in the fall of 2001. Initially, there were several small and large competitors offering one or two different models of IP switches to the market. Today, some of these competitors are withdrawing products from the market, without introducing new products. Management believes this has occurred because the technological requirements, both hardware and software, were underestimated. Current competitors include Zynx and Ramix, small private companies. The size of this market is small compared to the enterprise switch market and larger companies in that market are not expected to enter this segment due to the customization requirements and relatively low volumes, as compared to the enterprise market. In the network access market, the Company believes its key differentiations from its competitors are its depth of market experience and suite of communication software, known as NexusWare. The Company's products compete with products from Adax Incorporated, Audiocodes Ltd., Artesyn Technologies, Interphase Corporation and NMS Communications. In the signaling market, the Company generally focuses its engineering on products that use Internet Protocol (IP) to carry signaling traffic. Since this is a newer area in the signaling market, the Company believes it has an advantage over competitors' products. Companies such as Ulticom, Inc., Tekelec, NMS Communications and several larger companies that have proprietary SS7 technology or products could develop and sell products more directly competitive with the Company's signaling products. Research and Development The Company's research and development expenses were approximately $6.9 million, $7.9 million and $8.9 million for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. These expenses consist primarily of employee costs, material consumed in developing and designing new products, and amounts expended for software license/tools. The Company expects to continue to invest heavily in research and development in order to create innovative new products for the embedded systems market. The Company has developed significant core competencies applicable to computing platforms, single board computers, voice and data communications, high availability, hot swap, redundant technologies and signaling communications. The Company also has significant software expertise that it expects to apply to embedded systems and platforms. Proprietary Technology The Company's success depends upon retaining and maximizing the Company's proprietary technologies. To date, the Company has relied principally upon trademark, copyright and trade secret laws to protect its proprietary technology. The Company generally enters into confidentiality or license agreements with its customers, distributors and potential customers that contain confidentiality provisions, and limits access to, and distribution of, the source code to its software and other proprietary information. All of the Company's employees are subject to the Company's employment policy regarding confidentiality. The Company's software products are provided to customers under license, generally in the form of object code, which provides a high degree of confidentiality with respect to the intellectual property value. Suppliers In the fast paced technology environment, manufacturers frequently "obsolete" electronic components. Furthermore, more situations are arising where the Company is utilizing sole or limited source components on its products. The Company has generally been able to obtain adequate supplies of components or has redesigned specific products when adequate components are not available. The Company obtains components on a purchase order basis and does not generally have long-term contracts with any of its suppliers. Manufacturing The Company maintains a state-of-the-art manufacturing facility in Rochester, New York where it manufactures its network access, switching and signaling products. The Computing Products Group (formerly Ziatech) manufactures its products under contract and performs system level manufacturing and integration in-house. Management intends to transition the higher volume, contemporary computing products to its Rochester manufacturing operation during 2003. Rochester manufacturing operates under an integrated MRP system that assists in managing inventory levels and facilitates demand forecast. The Rochester surface mount manufacturing facility and quality management systems are currently certified to ISO 9002 standards. Many of the Company's products have high software content and are generally produced in low volumes. By utilizing an in-house manufacturing capability, management believes that the Company has achieved some safety from the risks inherent in utilizing contract manufacturing. These risks typically include the sub-contractor's inability to meet flexible manufacturing requirements, inventory control and cost containment. In addition, use of in-house manufacturing enables the Company to maintain a high quality level for its products and greater responsiveness to customer's delivery requirements. Management expects these attributes to be applied to the Ziatech products as selected products are transitioned from contract manufacturing to the Company's in-house facility. The Company has limited alternative capabilities through third parties, however, to perform such manufacturing activities. In the event of an interruption of production at its manufacturing facility, the Company's ability to deliver products in a timely fashion would be compromised, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. Employees During 2002, the Company improved its cost structure primarily through reductions in the Company's staff and by consolidating the engineering operations from its Raleigh, North Carolina facility into its Ottawa, Canada Signaling Group. The programs were performed during the first and third quarters of 2002 as the continuing decline in capital spending in the Company's target markets resulted in lower demand for the Company's products and lower than anticipated Company revenue. These reductions involved approximately forty employees and were initiated throughout the organization. In October 2002, the Company added approximately seventy employees with the acquisition of the new Computing Products Group (formerly Ziatech Corporation). As of January 31, 2003, the Company had 220 full-time employees, five part-time and contract employees and five Engineering Cooperative student employees. Management believes its relations with its employees are good. The Company's employees are not subject to collective bargaining agreements. The Company's fulltime employees work in the following areas: Research and Development 95 Marketing and Sales 32 Manufacturing 67 General and Administrative 26 Management believes that the Company's future success will depend on its ability to continue to attract and retain qualified personnel. Risk Factors Technological Change and New Product Introductions. The market for the Company's products is characterized by rapid technological change and frequent introduction of products based on new technologies. As new products are introduced, the industry standards change. Additionally, the overall embedded systems market, particularly the telecommunications industry, is volatile as the effects of new technologies, new standards, new products and short life cycles contribute to changes in the market and the performance of industry participants. The Company's future revenue will depend upon the Company's ability to anticipate technological changes and to develop and introduce enhanced products of its own on a timely basis that comply with new industry standards. New product introductions, or the delays thereof, could contribute to quarterly fluctuations in operating results as orders for new products commence and orders for existing products decline. Moreover, significant delays can occur between a product introduction and commencement of volume production. The inability to develop and manufacture new products in a timely manner, the existence of reliability, quality or availability problems in its products or their component parts, or the failure to achieve market acceptance for its products would have a material adverse effect on the Company's revenue and operating results. Further, in a poor economic climate, such as today, current technologies may become obsolete before being replaced by new technologies. Competition. The embedded systems market, particularly the telecommunications industry, is extremely competitive and the Company faces a number of large and small competitors. Many of the Company's principal competitors have established brand name recognition and market positions and have substantially greater experience and financial resources to deploy on promotion, advertising, research and product development than the Company. In addition, as the Company broadens its product offerings, it expects to face competition from new competitors. Companies in related markets could offer products with functionality similar or superior to that offered by the Company's products. Increased competition could result in price reductions, reduced margins and loss of market share, all of which would materially and adversely affect the Company's revenue and operating results. Large companies have recently acquired several of the Company's competitors. These acquisitions are likely to permit the Company's competition to devote significantly greater resources to the development and marketing of new competitive products and the marketing of existing competitive products to their larger installed bases. The Company expects that competition will increase substantially as a result of these and other industry consolidations and alliances, as well as the emergence of new competitors. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully with its existing or new competitors or that competitive pressures faced by the Company will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's revenue and operating results. Dependence on Key Customers. There can be no assurance that the Company's principal customers will continue to purchase products from the Company at current levels. Customers typically do not enter into long-term volume purchase contracts with the Company, and customers have certain rights to extend or delay the shipment of their orders. The loss of one or more of the Company's major customers, and the reduction, delay or cancellation of orders, or a delay in shipment of the Company's products to such customers, would have a material adverse effect on the Company's revenue and operating results. (See Management's Discussion and Analysis included elsewhere in this report). Design Wins. A design win is when a customer or prospective customer notifies the Company that its product has been selected to be integrated with their product. Ordinarily, there are a number of steps between the design win and when customers initiate production shipments. Typically, design wins reach production volumes at varying rates. Historically, this gestation period prior to volume orders has been twelve to eighteen months or more after the design win occurs. A variety of risks such as schedule delays, cancellations, and changes in customer markets and economic conditions can adversely affect a design win before production is reached or during deployment. While management still believes that design wins continue to be an important metric in evaluating the market acceptance of the Company's products, unfortunately in the current economic climate, fewer customers are doing new design activity and a smaller number of these design wins are moving into production than in the past. Potential Fluctuations in Annual and Quarterly Results. The Company's future annual and quarterly operating results can vary significantly depending on factors such as the timing and shipment of significant orders, new product introductions by the Company and its competitors, market acceptance of new and enhanced versions of the Company's products, changes in pricing policies by the Company and its competitors, the mix of distribution channels through which the Company's products are sold, inability to obtain sufficient supplies of sole or limited source components for the Company's products, and seasonal and general economic conditions. The Company's expense levels are based, in part, on the Company's expectations as to future revenue. Since a substantial portion of the Company's revenue in each quarter results from orders placed within the quarter and often shipped in the final weeks of that quarter, revenue levels are extremely difficult to predict. If revenue levels are below expectations, revenue and operating results will be adversely affected. Net income would be disproportionately affected by a reduction in revenue because only a small portion of the Company's net expenses varies with its revenue. (See Management's Discussion and Analysis included elsewhere in this report). Dependence on Third Party Component Suppliers. Certain components used in the Company's products are currently available to the Company from one or a limited number of sources. There can be no assurance that future supplies will be adequate for the Company's needs or will be available on prices and terms acceptable to the Company. The Company's inability in the future to obtain sufficient limited-source components, or to develop alternative sources, could result in delays in product introduction or shipments, and increased component prices could negatively affect the Company's gross margins, either of which will have a material adverse effect on the Company's revenue and operating results. Dependence on Internal Manufacturing. In order to avoid relying on outside contract manufacturers, the Company manufactures its network access, switch and signaling products at its Rochester, New York facility. The Company's newly acquired Ziatech computing and platform products have been manufactured at contract manufacturers. The Company does not have alternative manufacturing capabilities, either internally or through third parties, to perform its manufacturing functions except it expects to begin manufacturing certain of the Ziatech computing products in its Rochester manufacturing facility during 2003. Even if the Company were able to identify alternative third-party contract manufacturers, there can be no assurance that the Company would be able to retain their services on terms and conditions acceptable to the Company. In the event of an interruption in production, the Company would not be able to deliver products on a timely basis, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company's revenue and operating results. Although the Company currently has business interruption insurance, no assurances can be given that such insurance will adequately cover the Company's lost business as a result of such an interruption. Dependence on Proprietary Technology. The Company's success depends upon the Company's proprietary technologies. To date, the Company has relied principally upon trademark, copyright and trade secret laws to protect its proprietary technologies. The Company generally enters into confidentiality or license agreements with its customers, distributors and potential customers and limits access to and distribution of the source code to its software and other proprietary information. The Company's employees are subject to the Company's employment policy regarding confidentiality. There can be no assurance that the steps taken by the Company in this regard will be adequate to prevent misappropriation of its technologies or to provide an effective remedy in the event of a misappropriation by others. Although management believes that the Company's products do not infringe on the proprietary rights of third parties, there can be no assurance that infringement claims will not be asserted, resulting in costly litigation in which the Company may not ultimately prevail. Adverse determinations in such litigation could result in the loss of the Company's proprietary rights, subject the Company to significant liabilities, require the Company to seek licenses from third parties or prevent the Company from manufacturing or selling its products, any of which will have a material adverse effect on the Company's revenue and operating results. Because of the existence of a large number of patents in the computer networking industry and the rapid rate of new patents granted or new standards developed, or new technology, it may be necessary for the Company to enter into technology licenses from others. There can be no assurance that these third party technology licenses will be available to the Company on commercially reasonable terms. The loss of, or inability to obtain, any of these technology licenses could result in delays or reductions in product shipments. Any such delays or reductions in product shipments will have a material adverse effect on the Company's revenue and operating results. Dependence on Personnel. The Company's success depends on the continued contributions of its personnel, many of whom would be difficult to replace. Over the past several years, one of the incentives used to retain key personnel has been the issuance of stock options. Unfortunately, in the current market, the Company's stock price has declined such that almost all of those stock options are below the grant price, thereby negating the retention attributes of those instruments. Through mid-2001, competition for engineering personnel in the Company's marketplace was intense. Since mid-2001, engineering personnel seem to be more readily available. Although the Company's employees are subject to the Company's employment policy regarding confidentiality and ownership of inventions, employees are generally not subject to employment agreements or non-competition covenants. Changes in personnel could adversely affect the Company's operating results. Notes: IPnexus, NexusWare, FlexNat, Ziatech, and SEGway are trademarks of Performance Technologies, Inc. ITEM 2 - Properties The Company's corporate headquarters are located in 57,000 square feet of office and manufacturing space in Rochester, New York. Corporate headquarters include the executive offices, along with sales, marketing, engineering and manufacturing operations. The Company relocated these operations to this leased facility in April 2002. This lease expires in 2012. There is sufficient room for growth in the intermediate term in this facility and it is capable of accommodating a variety of expansion options. In 2001, the Company purchased land adjacent to this facility to accommodate future expansion. The Company's Computing Products Group (formerly Ziatech Corporation) is located in 61,000 square feet of office and manufacturing space leased in San Luis Obispo, California. This lease expires in 2008. This facility includes sales and marketing personnel, and engineering and manufacturing operations for the computing products. Approximately 12,000 square feet of this facility is currently sublet to a tenant and there is sufficient room for this group's intermediate-term growth in this facility. The Company has sales and marketing personnel, and signaling engineering staff located in 13,000 square feet of office space leased in a building located in downtown Ottawa, Canada. The office lease agreements in this building expire in May 2003. The Company has the option to renew these leases for a future period of one or two years. The Company expects to exercise its renewal options under these leases. The Signaling Group also had 7,000 square feet of office space in downtown Raleigh, North Carolina. In September 2002, the engineering functions at this facility were consolidated into the Ottawa, Canada signaling operations. The Company is attempting to sublet this space, however, the commercial office space market in downtown Raleigh is very soft. This office lease expires in February 2005. The Company also leases sales and engineering offices in San Diego, California and sales offices in Connecticut and the United Kingdom. ITEM 3 - Legal Proceedings From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of its operations in the normal course of business. With the exception of the following items, the Company is not a party to any such legal proceedings, the adverse outcome of which, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. Following the Company's announcement on May 19, 2000 regarding its preliminary results of operations for the second quarter, several class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York against the Company, as well as several of its officers and directors, alleging violations of federal securities laws. On September 25, 2002, the Company announced it had signed a Memorandum of Understanding for the settlement of the class action litigation. The Company recorded a charge of $143,000 in the third quarter of 2002 in connection with the settlement of the litigation. The terms of the settlement outlined in the memorandum between the Company and the class action plaintiffs have been submitted to the Court in the form of a settlement agreement. This proposed settlement will be subject to Court acceptance and approval. ITEM 4 - Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter 2002. PART II ITEM 5 - Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters The Company's common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market System under the trading symbol "PTIX." The following table sets forth the high and the low quarterly closing prices of the common stock during the two most recent years, as reported on the Nasdaq National Market System. These prices represent quotations among securities dealers without adjustments for retail markups, markdowns or commissions and may not represent actual transactions. 2002 High Low ----------------------------------------------------------------------- First Quarter $13.57 $ 7.65 Second Quarter 8.60 6.25 Third Quarter 6.31 3.43 Fourth Quarter $ 4.74 $ 3.20
10-K4th "Page" of 25TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 4th
2001 High Low ----------------------------------------------------------------------- First Quarter $15.75 $10.06 Second Quarter 16.49 10.00 Third Quarter 17.40 8.22 Fourth Quarter $13.55 $ 8.00 As of February 28, 2003, there were 189 stockholders of record of the Company's common stock. To date, the Company has not paid cash dividends on its common stock and has no intention to do so for the foreseeable future. Equity Plan Information: The Performance Technologies, Incorporated 2001 Stock Option Plan was approved by the Company's stockholders at the 2001 Annual Meeting. The following table provides certain information regarding the Company's equity compensation plan. [Enlarge/Download Table] (a) (b) (c) Number of securities to be issued upon Weighted average Number of Plan Category exercise of exercise price of securities outstanding outstanding remaining options, warrants options, warrants available for and rights and rights future issuance ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 2,146,680 $10.46 875,050 Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Total 2,146,680 $10.46 875,050 =================== =================== ==================== The Company has no equity compensation plans that have not been approved by its stockholders. ITEM 6 - Selected Financial Data ----------------------- (in thousands, except per share amounts) [Enlarge/Download Table] For the Years Ended December 31: 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 ----------------------------------------------- ----------- -- ----------- --- ----------- -- ----------- -- ------------ Sales $27,014 $36,517 $38,963 $44,494 $34,118 Income from operations 326 5,186 7,050 6,226 6,047 Basic earnings per share: Net income from operations (1) $ .03 $ .42 $ .54 $ .47 $ .46 Weighted average common shares 12,263 12,282 13,106 13,165 13,077 Diluted earnings per share: Net income from operations (1) $ .03 $ .41 $ .51 $ .45 $ .45 Weight average common and common equivalent shares 12,373 12,708 13,769 13,789 13,517 Excluding non-recurring expenses (2) (3) Income from operations $ 1,186 $ 5,186 $ 7,050 $ 7,970 $ 6,047 Basic earnings per share $ .10 $ .42 $ .54 $ .61 $ .46 Diluted earnings per share $ .10 $ .41 $ .51 $ .58 $ .45 At December 31: 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 ----------------------------------------------- ----------- -- ----------- --- ----------- -- ----------- -- ------------ Working capital $32,130 $34,728 $36,975 $39,009 $32,221 Total assets 45,204 42,954 44,758 49,142 40,122 Long-term debt, less current portion 6 Total stockholders' equity $38,809 $38,342 $39,468 $40,828 $34,180
10-K5th "Page" of 25TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 5th
(1) All per share amounts have been adjusted where appropriate, for the three-for-two stock split effected in September 1999. (2) In 2002, using an effective tax rate of 31%, amounts exclude non-recurring expenses amounting to $.9 million, or $.07 per share. In 1999, amounts exclude a $1.7 million charge for acquisition expenses. (3) This data is a non-GAAP measure that should be read in conjunction with GAAP disclosures herein. ITEM 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations The Company's annual operating performance is subject to various risks and uncertainties. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes, included elsewhere herein, as well as the section appearing in ITEM 1 of this Form 10-K under the heading "Risk Factors." The Company's future operating results may be affected by various trends and factors which are beyond the Company's control. These include, among other factors, general business and economic conditions, rapid or unexpected changes in technologies, cancellation or delay of customer orders including those relating to design wins, changes in the product or customer mix of sales, delays in new product development, customer acceptance of new products and customer delays in qualification of products. In addition, during difficult economic periods, customer's visibility deteriorates causing delays in their placement of orders. These factors often result in a substantial portion of the Company's revenue being derived from orders placed within the quarter and shipped in the final month of the quarter. Matters discussed in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and elsewhere in this Form 10-K include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are subject to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company's actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Overview Industry: 2002 was a challenging year with continuing erosion in the general business environment, as well as the Company's target markets. In these markets, the telecommunications industry is the largest sector which was burdened with overcapacity and a slowing economy that resulted in reduced prices, stifled competition and severely limited capital expenditures. Other end markets for embedded systems also experienced business slowdowns during 2002, but not as severe as the telecommunications industry. Management responded to these demanding market conditions through a series of initiatives that allowed the Company to maintain profitability while many comparable organizations suffered large financial losses that, in some cases, threatened their continued operations. Please refer to PART 1, Item 1, under the caption "Business", for a discussion of the industry, economic environment and the Company's initiatives during 2002. Traditionally, "design wins" have been an important metric for management to judge the Company's product acceptance in its marketplace. Typically, design wins reach production volumes at varying rates, generally beginning twelve-to-eighteen months after the design win occurs. A variety of risks such as schedule delays, cancellations, and changes in customer markets and economic conditions can adversely affect a design win before production is reached or during deployment. While management still believes that design wins continue to be an important metric in evaluating the market acceptance of the Company's products, unfortunately in the current economic climate, fewer customers are doing new design activity and a smaller number of these design wins are moving into production than in the past. During 2002, the Company received notification for twenty-four new design wins for its IPnexus Switching (8), IPnexus Access (12), Ziatech Computing and Platform (2), and SEGway SS7 IP Signaling products (2), compared to thirty-five new design wins during 2001. Not all design wins are expected to result in production orders. Financial: On October 2, 2002, the Company acquired a portion of Intel Corporation's Embedded Communications Platform Division (formerly Ziatech Corporation). Beginning in the fourth quarter, the Company's revenue and expenses reflect the Ziatech operations. In 2002, the following non-recurring items affected the comparability of income between years: o restructuring charges ($.6 million pre-tax, or $.03 per share); o in-process research and development expense ($.4 million after-tax, or $.03 per share); and o class action settlement costs ($.1 million pre-tax, or $.01 per share). Revenue for 2002 amounted to $27.0 million, compared to $36.5 million in 2001. The continuing decline in capital spending in the communications and telecommunications markets dramatically impacted the Company's network access and signaling product revenue in 2002. The newly acquired Ziatech operations contributed $5.0 million to revenue in 2002. Sales outside of North America amounted to $6.9 million and $9.7 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively. Net income in 2002 amounted to $.3 million, or $.03 per share, including non-recurring expenses, and amounted to $1.2 million, or $.10 per share, excluding non-recurring expenses, based on 12.4 million shares outstanding. Using an effective income tax rate of 31%, non-recurring expenses during 2002 amounted to $.9 million after tax, or $.07 per share. Net income in 2001 amounted to $5.2 million, or $.41 per share, based on 12.7 million shares outstanding. Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities amounted to $24.1 million and $26.9 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and no long-term debt existed at either date. During 2002 and 2001, the Company generated $5.5 million and $9.0 million of cash from operating activities, respectively. During 2002 and 2001, the Company expended $.1 million and $6.9 million, respectively, to buy back its shares in the open market. In September 2002, the Company invested $1.5 million for a 47% minority interest in Momentum Computer, Inc. and loaned Momentum an additional $1.0 million to be used for working capital. In October 2002, the Company acquired a portion of Intel Corporation's Embedded Communications Platform Division (formerly Ziatech Corporation) for $3.0 million in cash. Results of Operations The following table sets forth for the years indicated certain consolidated financial data expressed as a percentage of sales and is included as an aid to understanding the Company's results and should be read in conjunction with the selected financial data and Consolidated Financial Statements (including the notes there