SEC Info  
  Home     Search     My Interests     Help     Sign In     Please Sign In  

Icts International NV ˇ 20-F ˇ For 12/31/02

Filed On 7/1/03 3:04pm ET   ˇ   SEC File 0-28542   ˇ   Accession Number 1012118-3-36

  in   Show  and 
  As Of               Filer                 Filing     As/For/On Docs:Pgs              Issuer               Agent

 7/01/03  Icts International NV             20-F       12/31/02    1:116                                    McLaughlin & Ste..LLP/FA

Annual Report of a Foreign Private Issuer   ˇ   Form 20-F
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: 20-F        Annual Report of a Foreign Private Issuer            116    673K 


Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page
2Item 17 [ ]. Item 18 [X]
4Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
"Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
"Item 3. Key information
5Risk Factors
12Item 4. Information on the Company
22Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
35Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees
41Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
42Related Party Transactions
44Item 8
45Item 9. The Offer and Listing
46Item 10. Additional Information Memorandum and Articles of Association
59Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk Foreign Currency Exchange Risk - See Item 3 - Risk Factors;
"Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities
"Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
"Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
"Item 15. Controls and Procedures
60Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
"Item 17. Financial Statements
61Item 19. Exhibits
20-F1st Page of 116TOCTopPreviousNextBottomJust 1st
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F [ ] REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED] FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-28542 ICTS INTERNATIONAL N.V. (Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Not Applicable (Translation of Registrant's name into English) The Netherlands (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) Biesbosch 225, 1181 JC Amstelveen, The Netherlands (Address of principal executive offices) Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each Class: Name of each exchange on which registered: None None Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Shares, par value .45 Euro per share Title of Class
20-F2nd Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 2nd
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None Title of Class Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or common stock as of December 31, 2002: 6,513,100 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] NO [ ] Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17 [ ] Item 18 [X] 2 When used in this Form 20-F, the words Amay@, Awill@, Aexpect@, Aanticipate@, Acontinue@, Aestimates@, Aproject@, Aintend@ and similar expressions are intended to identify Forward-Looking Statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regarding events, conditions and financial trends that may affect the Company=s future plans of operations, business strategy, operating results and financial position. Prospective investors are cautioned that any Forward-Looking Statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties and that actual results may differ materially from those included within the Forward-Looking Statements as a result of various factors. [Enlarge/Download Table]
20-F3rd Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 3rd
Table of Contents Part I Item 1 Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers Item 2 Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable Item 3 Key Information Item 4 Information on the Company Item 5 Operating and Financial Review and Prospects Item 6 Directors, Officers and Employees Item 7 Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions Item 8 Financial Information Item 9 The Offering and Listing Item 10 Additional Information Item 11 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk Item 12 Description of Securities other than Equity Securities Part II Item 13 Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies Item 14 Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and the Use of Proceed Item 15 Controls and Procedures Part III Item 17 Financial Statements Item 18 Financial Statements Item 19 Exhibits Exhibits Exhibit 8 Subsidiaries (included herein) Exhibit 10.1 Consolidated Financial Statements (included herein) Exhibit 10.2 Certification by the Registrant's Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (included herein) Exhibit 10.3 Certification by the Registrant's Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (included herein) 4
20-F4th Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 4th
PART I Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers Not Applicable Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable Not Applicable Item 3. Key information. 5
20-F5th Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 5th
Selected Financial Data The following table summarizes certain statement of operations data for ICTS for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002: Year ended December 31, 2002 2001 2000 REVENUES $279,931 $212,137 $147,364 --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- --------------------- COST OF REVENUES 214,054 189,925 131,540 --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- --------------------- GROSS PROFIT 65,877 22,212 15,824 --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- --------------------- AMORTIZATION OF GOODWILL 820 759 --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- --------------------- IMPAIRMENT OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS 9,156 392 --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- --------------------- SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE 25,636 18,641 11,631 EXPENSES --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- --------------------- OPERATING INCOME 31,085 2,751 3,042 --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- --------------------- INTEREST EXPENSE (2,463) (1,637) (1,927) --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- --------------------- EXCHANGE DIFFERENCES 2,356 1,965 851 --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- --------------------- OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES) 41,229 29,520 (1,145) --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- --------------------- INCOME BEFORE TAXES ON INCOME 75,064 34,248 1,554 --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- --------------------- TAXES ON INCOME 16,442 4,919 737 --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- --------------------- INCOME FROM OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY AND ITS SUBSIDIAIRIES 58,622 29,329 817 --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- --------------------- SHARE IN PROFITS (LOSSES) OF ASSOCIATED COMPANIES (1,807) (395) 25 --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- --------------------- MINORITY INTERESTS IN LOSSES (PROFITS) OF SUBSIDIARIES _______ (2,736) 28 --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- --------------------- NET INCOME FOR THE YEAR $56,815 $26,198 $870 --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- --------------------- OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS): --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- --------------------- Translation adjustments 710 (1,811) (2,516) Unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities 731 (345) (7,747) Reclassification adjustment for losses for available for sale securities included in net income (771) 368 7,627 670 (1,788) (2,637) --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- --------------------- TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) FOR $57,485 $24,410 $(1,767) THE YEAR ====== ====== ====== --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- --------------------- EARNINGS PER SHARE: Basic $8.85 $4.18 $0.14 ===== ==== ==== $8.80 $4.09 $0.14 Diluted ==== ==== ===== --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- --------------------- Risk Factors. 6
20-F6th Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 6th
You should carefully consider the risks described below regarding the business and the ownership of our shares. If any of the risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected, and the price of our common stock could decline significantly. Recent developments have had a significant impact on our operations. Two major events in 2001 and early 2002 significantly changed our business operations: (i) the sale of substantially all of our European operations and (ii) the passage of the Aviation and Transportation Security Act (the "Security Act") by the United States Congress in response to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 pursuant to which the Federal government through the Transportation Security Administration (the "TSA) took over aviation security services in the U.S. in November 2002. As a result of these events, we have limited aviation security operations in Europe and in the U.S. We previously derived most of our revenues from the provision of aviation security services and we have developed substantial experience and expertise in that field. If we are unable to increase revenues from aviation security services, our financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected. If we are unsuccessful in resolving our disagreements with the TSA there may be a significant material adverse effect on our financial condition. In February 2002, we entered into an aviation security services contract with the TSA to continue to provide aviation security services in all of its current airport locations until the earlier of either the completed transition of these security services on an airport by airport basis to the U.S. Federal Government or November 2002. In the process of definitizing the Contract, the TSA has expressed its view, that the definitization process should be on a Acost plus basis@. Accordingly, with respect to the TSA=s interpretation of the Contract as well as its calculation of payments made to Huntleigh for services provided under the Contract, the TSA has made to Huntleigh an overpayment of approximately US$ 32,000,000 in the aggregate. The TSA derives this amount from various items, consisting primarily actual costs incurred in the contract plus allowing a ten (10%) percent profit. Since the contract clearly states that it is a firm fixed price contract the Company has taken the position that the definitization can not be calculated on a cost plus basis and that the only issue for validation is the number of hours worked. In addition, the Company claims unpaid invoices of $11.5 million, corporate bonus of 5% equaling $10.5 million and claims in the amount of $21 million due to notice not being given on time, as specified in the contract. On primary billings, the Company has been paid by the TSA $14.3 million more than initial invoices. When this is taken into account, according to the Company=s calculations, the balance due it from the TSA is $28.7 million. These claims have been challenged by the TSA. We have not recorded our claim against the TSA on our financial statements. In the event that we are not successful in resolving our disagreement with the TSA, then there may be a material adverse effect on our financial condition, by an expense of up t approximately $32 million. 7
20-F7th Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 7th
Claim for Loss of Business Huntleigh=s main business was providing airport security services to airlines and airports as a result of the creation of the TSA and the requirement that the TSA take over airport security Huntleigh has lost its principal business. Huntleigh is currently exploring the legal effect of this ATaking@ and its rights under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Huntleigh=s present plans are to pursue its claim for a ATaking@ to recover the goin concern value of the lost business but there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of such claim and whether or not Huntleigh will be successful in prosecuting the same. We face significant potential liability claims. As a result of the September 11th terrorists attacks numerous lawsuits have been commenced against us and our U.S. subsidiary. The cases arise out of airport security services provided for United Flight 175 out of Logan Airport in Boston, Massachusetts which crashed into the World Trade Center. In addition, to the present claims additional claims may be asserted. The outcome of these or additional cases is uncertain. If there is an adverse outcome with respect to any of these claims which is not covered by insurance, then there may be a significant adverse impact on us. Our operations in the United States will be dependent on our ability to do business with the TSA. The Security Act provides that all aviation security services in the U.S. will be handled by the federal government through the TSA. As a result of the passage of the Security Act the TSA took over aviation security in the U.S. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the TSA accounted for 73% of our revenues. Our failure to be able to meet the TSA's requirements or to secure contracts from the TSA will have a material adverse affect on our business. We are dependent on our key personnel. Our success will largely depend on the services of our senior management and executive personnel. The loss of the services of one or more of such key personnel could have a material adverse impact on our operations. Our success will also be dependent upon our ability to hire and retain additional qualified executive personnel. We cannot assure you that we will be able to attract, assimilate and retain personnel with the attributes necessary to execute our strategy. We cannot assure you that one or more of our executives will not leave our employment and either work for a competitor or otherwise compete with us. We will be dependent on major customers. 8
20-F8th Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 8th
In light of recent developments, customers that were not considered our major customers in 2002 are anticipated to become our major customers. If our relationship with our major customers is impaired, then there may be a material adverse affect on our results of operations and financial condition. Our success will be dependent upon our ability to change our business strategy. Under our new business strategy we intend to develop technological solutions and systems for the aviation security industry, develop or acquire security activities other than aviation security, invest in security related and non-security related businesses, such as entertainment projects and seek other revenue producing businesses and business opportunities. We cannot assure you that we will be able to develop new systems or develop systems that are commercially viable. Our success in developing and marketing our systems will also depend on our ability to adapt to rapid technology changes in the industry and to integrate such changes into our systems. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in our attempts to change or implement our business strategy. We may not have the expertise to be successful in developing our business in areas that are not related to the security industry. Our failure to change our business strategy or implement it successfully will have a material adverse affect on our financial condition and results of operations. We compete in a highly competitive industry and our competitors, who may have many more resources than us, may be more successful in developing new technology and achieving market acceptance of their products. Competition in the aviation security industry as well as in the non-security related aviation services industry is intense. Many of our competitors have greater financial, technical and marketing resources. We expect that our competitors will develop and market alternative systems and technologies that may have greater functionality or be more cost effective than the services we provide or the systems that we may develop. If our competitors develop such systems we may not be able to successfully market our systems. Even if we are able to develop systems with greater functionality which are more cost effective than those developed by our competitors, we may not be able to achieve market acceptance of our systems because our competitors have greater financial and marketing resources. The aviation security industry is subject to extensive government regulation, the impact of which is difficult to predict. The Security Act has had a significant negative impact on our aviation security business. In addition, our ability to successfully market new systems will be dependent upon government regulations over which we have no control. Any existing or new regulation may cause us to incur 9
20-F9th Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 9th
increased expenses or impose substantial liability upon us. The likelihood of such new legislation is difficult to predict. The markets for our products and services may be adversely affected by legislation designed to protect privacy rights. From time to time, personal identity data bases and technologies utilizing such data bases have been the focus of organizations and individuals seeking to curtail or eliminate the use of personal identity information technologies on the grounds that personal information and these technologies may be used to diminish personal privacy rights. In the event that such initiatives result in restrictive legislation, the market for our products may be adversely affected. Our operations are dependent upon obtaining required licenses. A license to operate is required from the airport authority in the airports in which we currently operate. Our licenses are usually issued for a period of 12 months and are renewable. The loss of, or failure to obtain, a license to operate in one or more of such airports could result in the loss of or the inability to compete for contracts in the airports in which we have licenses. Our contracts with airports or airlines may be canceled. Our services are typically provided pursuant to contracts, which are cancelable on short notice at any time, with or without cause. We cannot assure you that an existing client will decide not to terminate us or fail to renew a contract. Any such termination or failure to renew a contract with us could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Our financial condition is subject to currency risk. Part of our income is derived in foreign countries. We generally retain our income in local currency at the location the funds are received. Since our financial statements are presented in United States dollars, any significant fluctuation in the currency exchange rate between such currency and the United States dollar would affect our results of operations and our financial condition. The market price of our common stock may be volatile, which may make it more difficult for you to resell your shares when you want at prices you find attractive. The market price of our common stock may from time to time be significantly affected by a large number of factors, including, among others, variations in our operating results, the depth and liquidity of the trading market for our shares, and differences between actual results of operations and the results anticipated by investors and securities analysts. Many of the factors which affect the market price of our common stock are outside of our control and may not even be directly related to us. 10
20-F10th Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 10th
Management beneficially owns approximately 65% of our shares; their interests could conflict with yours; significant sales of shares held by them could have a negative effect on our stock price. Ezra Harel and Menachem Atzmon collectively beneficially own 65% of our issued and outstanding common stock. Mr. Harel is the Chairman of our Supervisory Board and Mr. Atzmon is a member of the Supervisory Board. As a result of their ownership and position, Mr. Harel and Mr. Atzmon are able to significantly influence all matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. Such concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control. In addition, sales of significant amounts of shares held by Mr. Harel or Mr. Atzmon or the prospect of these sales, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. We cannot assure you that we will continue to pay dividends. Although we have paid cash dividends in the past, we cannot assure you that any future dividends will be declared or paid. We are subject to the laws of the Netherlands. As a Netherlands "Naamloze Vennootschap" (N.V.) public limited company, we are subject to certain requirements not generally applicable to corporations organized under the laws of jurisdictions within the United States. Among other things, the authority to issue shares is vested in the general meeting of shareholders, except to the extent such authority to issue shares has been delegated by the shareholders or by the Articles of Association to another corporate body for a period not exceeding five years. The issuance of the common shares is generally subject to shareholder preemptive rights, except to the extent that such preemptive rights have been excluded or limited by the general meeting of shareholders (subject to a qualified majority of two-thirds of the votes if less than 50% of the outstanding share capital is present or represented) or by the corporate body designated to do so by the general meeting of shareholders or the Articles of Association. Such a designation may only take place if such corporate body has also been designated to issue shares. In this regard, the general meeting of shareholders has authorized our Supervisory Board to issue any authorized and unissued shares at any time up to five years from June 26, 2001 the date of such authorization and has authorized the Supervisory Board to exclude or limit shareholder preemptive rights with respect to any issuance of common shares prior to such date. Such authorizations may be renewed by the general meeting of shareholders from time to time, for up to five years at a time. This authorization would also permit the issuance of shares in an acquisition, provided that shareholder approval is required in connection with a statutory merger (except that, in certain limited circumstances, the board of directors of a surviving company may resolve to legally merge the company). Shareholders do not have preemptive rights with respect to shares which are issued against payment other than in cash. 11
20-F11th Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 11th
Our corporate affairs are governed by our Articles of Association and by the laws governing corporations incorporated in The Netherlands. Our public shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions by the Supervisory Board or the Management Board, or their members, or controlling shareholders, than they would as shareholders of a company incorporated in the United States. Under our Articles of Association, adoption of our annual accounts by the shareholders discharges the Supervisory Board, the Management Board and their members from liability in respect of the exercise of their duties for the particular financial year, unless an explicit reservation is made by the shareholders and without prejudice to the provisions of Netherlands law, including provisions relating to liability of members of supervisory boards and management boards upon the bankruptcy of a company pursuant to the relevant provisions of The Netherlands Civil Code. However, the discharge of the Supervisory Board and the Management Board and their members by the shareholders is not absolute and will not be effective as to matters misrepresented or not disclosed to the shareholders. An individual member of the Supervisory Board or the Management Board who can prove that he is not at fault for such an omission or misrepresentation would not be liable. A U.S. judgment may not be enforceable in The Netherlands. A significant number of our assets are located outside the United States. In addition, members of the Management and Supervisory Boards[ and certain experts named herein are residents of countries other than the United States ]. As a result, it may not be possible for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon such persons or to enforce against such persons judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon civil liabilities under the United States federal securities laws. There is no treaty between the United States and The Netherlands for the mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments (other than arbitration awards) in civil and commercial matters. Therefore, a final judgment for the payment of money rendered by any federal or state court in the United States based on civil liability, whether or not predicated solely upon the federal securities laws, would not be directly enforceable in The Netherlands. In order to enforce any United States judgment obtained against us, proceedings must be initiated before a court of competent jurisdiction in The Netherlands. A court in The Netherlands will, under current practice, normally issue a judgment incorporating the judgment rendered by the United States court if it finds that (i) the United States court had jurisdiction over the original proceeding, (ii) the judgment was obtained in compliance with principles of due process, (iii) the judgment is final and conclusive and (iv) the judgment does not contravene the public policy or public order of The Netherlands. We cannot assure you that that United States investors will be able to enforce any judgments in civil and commercial matters, including judgments under the federal securities laws against us or members of the Management or Supervisory Board [or certain experts named herein] who are residents of The Netherlands or countries other than the United States. In addition, a court in The Netherlands might not impose civil liability on us or on the members of the Management or Supervisory Boards in an original action predicated solely upon the federal securities laws of the United States brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in The Netherlands. 12
20-F12th Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 12th
We may be a passive foreign investment company under U.S. Federal income tax law. Under certain circumstances, we may be a passive foreign investment company ("PFIC") for the calendar year 2002, depending on events for calendar 2003 and 2004. The determination as to whether or not we are depends on part on two mechanical tests relating to passive income and passive assets and are dependent upon IRS proposed regulations which are not yet in effect. If we are a PFIC U.S. shareholders on the sale or receipt of distributions on their stock would have adverse tax consequences as the distributions would be treated as ordinary income and maybe subject to an interest charge. See Taxation-United States Income Tax Consequences - Passive Foreign Investment Companies. Item 4. Information on the Company History and Development of the Company. Unless the context indicates otherwise, all references herein to the "Company" include ICTS International N.V. ("ICTS" or the "Company"), its consolidated subsidiaries, Demco Consultants, Ltd. ("Demco"), an Israeli affiliate, Procheck International B.V. ("PI", an affiliate in The Netherlands) and Ramasso Holdings B.V. ("Ramasso", an affiliate in The Netherlands) and Huntleigh USA Corp. ("Huntleigh"). ICTS is a public limited liability company organized under the laws of The Netherlands in 1992. ICTS's offices are located at Biesboch 225, 1181 JC Amstelveen, The Netherlands and its telephone number is +31-20-347-1077. The Company's predecessor, International Consultants on Targeted Security Holland B.V. ("ICTS Holland"), was founded in The Netherlands in 1987. Until 1994, subsidiaries and affiliates of ICTS Holland conducted similar business in which the Company is currently engaged. In connection with the acquisition of the Company by Leedan as of January 1, 1994, ICTS Holland's interest in its subsidiaries (other than three minor subsidiaries) was transferred to ICTS International B.V. ("ICTS International") which became an indirect wholly- owned subsidiary of Leedan. Thereafter, ICTS International purchased from a third party all of the outstanding shares of ICTS, incorporated in The Netherlands in 1992 without any operations prior to its acquisition by ICTS International. As of January 1, 1996, the Company acquired all of the assets and assumed all of the liabilities of ICTS International. In August 1997, the Company acquired 37% of the outstanding shares of Demco for approximately $1.2 million. As of December 31, 2002 the Company owned 67% of Demco. In addition, there are put and call agreements in effect which enable the Company to acquire the balance of the shares. Demco, a privately-held firm based in Israel, is engaged in design, planning and implementation of emergency systems and contingency procedures for government agencies and large organizations. 13
20-F13th Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 13th
As a result of a series of transactions in 1997 and 1998, the Company acquired a 51% interest in Advanced Maintenance Systems Ltd. ("AMS"). From 1997 through 2001, the Company through its affiliate, PI, acquired all the outstanding shares of APS Data Screening Systems B.V. ("APS"). In 2001, the Company sold its interest in AMS in exchange for shares of APS and Trainsoft Ltd. As of January 1, 1999 the Company acquired 80% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Huntleigh and in January 2001 the Company exercised its option to acquire the remaining 20% at an agreed upon price formula making Huntleigh a wholly owned subsidiary. Huntleigh is a provider of aviation services in the United States. In 2001 and 2002 ICTS sold substantially all of its European operations in two stages, for an aggregate purchase price of $103 million. As a result of the sale, ICTS has fully divested itself from its European operations, except for its operations in The Netherlands and Russia. In the wake of the events which occurred on September 11, 2001, the federal government of the United States, in November, 2001, enacted the Aviation and Transportation Security Act (the "Security Act") Public Law 107-71. Under the Security Act, entities may provide aviation security services in the United States only if they are owned and controlled at least 75% by U.S. citizens. As a company organized under the laws of The Netherlands ICTS may be unable to comply with the ownership requirements under the Security Act. The Security Act is administered through the Transportation Security Administration (the "TSA"). In the fourth quarter of 2002, pursuant to the Security Act the Federal government through the TSA took over substantially all of the aviation security operations in U.S. airports. As a result, ICTS through its wholly-owned subsidiary Huntleigh, provides limited aviation security services in the United States. Business Overview General ICTS specializes primarily in the provision of aviation security services. In addition, ICTS provides non-security related aviation services and develops technological systems and solutions for the security market. ICTS also engages in certain other activities, including constructing and developing entertainment related projects. Business Strategy ICTS is currently pursuing the following business strategy. Developing Security Related Technology. ICTS plans to focus on developing security systems and technology for the 14
20-F14th Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 14th
aviation security and non-aviation security markets. ICTS intends to use the know-how and expertise it has acquired in the provision of enhanced aviation security services to develop such security systems and technology. Developing Entertainment Projects. ICTS plans to develop entertainment projects. During 2002 ICTS began the construction and development of its "Time Elevator" project in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Baltimore, Maryland. Time Elevators are educational tourist attractions which combine motion based platforms with synchronized movies and sound effects. Expanding Aviation Security Operations in The Netherlands. ICTS intends to expand its aviation security operations in The Netherlands. In 2002 ICTS increased its stake in its Dutch affiliate, ProCheck International to 100%. ICTS also formed a partnership with ICTS Europe through which it further expanded its aviation security operations in The Netherlands. ICTS Europe was sold by ICTS in 2002 to an unaffiliated third party. U.S. Operations. ICTS intends to continue to provide non-security aviation services in the U.S. and intends to offer security technology to the U.S. government for the aviation industry. Other Investments. ICTS intends to make investments in companies and properties which management believes have long term benefits. It is anticipated that such investments will be in diverse industries and instruments. Services Services Offered in Europe. Prior to the sale of its European operations, ICTS primarily provided aviation security services, operated airport checkpoints, verified travel documents, provided baggage reconciliation services, operated electronic equipment, such as x- ray screening devices, and operated manual devices. Following the sale, ICTS primarily provides advanced passenger screening services in The Netherlands and Russia. Services Offered in the United States. Prior to the enactment of the Security Act, Huntleigh was one of the leading providers of non-security aviation services in the United States. Immediately following the enactment of the Security Act, but prior to the TSA taking over aviation security services in the United States, in November 2002, Huntleigh experienced a substantial increase in its aviation security services. 15
20-F15th Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 15th
Huntleigh currently provides limited aviation security services and nine other separate services at approximately 37 airports in 29 states which were not affected by the enactment of the Security Act. Each of the non-aviation security services involves one of the following specific job classifications. Agent Services. Agent services include: Priority Passenger, Service Representative, Baggage Service, Priority Parcel, and Cargo. Although an agent is a Huntleigh employee, the employee is considered a representative of specific airlines. Guard Services. Guard services involve guarding secured areas, including aircraft. Janitorial Services. Huntleigh provides cleaning services for aircraft cabins and portions of airports. Maintenance. Huntleigh provides workers to maintain equipment in one airport. Ramp Services. Ramp services include: . . directing aircraft into the arrival gate and from the departure gate . cleaning the aircraft . conducting cabin searches . stocking supplies . de-icing the aircraft and . moving luggage from one airplane to another. Shuttle Service. Huntleigh shuttles airline crews from their hotels to the aircraft in one airport. Skycap Services Provider. A skycap assists passengers with their luggage. Located at the curbside of the check-in at airports, a skycap checks in passengers' luggage and meets security requirements established by the FAA to screen passengers. A skycap also assists arriving passengers with transporting luggage from the baggage carousel to ground transportation or other designated areas. A skycap also may operate electric carts for transporting passengers through the airport and transport checked baggage from the curbside check-in to the airline counter. 16
20-F16th Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 16th
Concierge Service involves a skycap monitoring the baggage carousel to ensure that passengers do not remove luggage not belonging to them. In many airports, a skycap at the baggage claim area checks to see if the passengers' luggage tags match those on the specific luggage to ensure that a passenger is only removing his or her own luggage from the claim area. Wheelchair attendants. Wheelchair attendants transport passengers through the airport in airline-owned wheelchairs. Working closely with the attendants are dispatch agents who monitor requests and assignments for wheelchairs and dispatch the attendants as needed. Aviation Security Services ICTS provides pre-departure screening services at airports in The Netherlands and Russia. Prior to the enactment of the Security Act, Huntleigh provided such services in the U.S. Such services are designed to prevent or deter the carriage of any explosive, incendiary device, weapon or other dangerous objects into the sterile area of an airport concourse and aboard the aircraft. In 2002 Huntleigh provided such services exclusively to the TSA. Technological Systems and Solutions Advanced Passenger Screening. A principal service that ICTS had provided to its clients prior to the sale of its European operations, had been the Risk Analysis through Profiling System ("RAPS"). RAPS is a set of sophisticated procedures which seek to identify a potential threat before it materializes, through a methodology of risk evaluation and classification of passengers. The risk evaluation and classification techniques include comparing characteristics of a specific passenger to a preset standard of characteristics of a potential aggressor through interviewing, document verification and behavior analysis. The vast majority of passengers fall into the low risk category. Therefore more scrutiny can be focused on higher risk passengers. Since RAPS entails the identification of potential threats through recognizable patterns, ICTS believes that it provides a better response to such threats than other alternatives. Other methods include, simple guard positioning or a complete body and baggage search of each passenger. In addition, by focusing on the primary risks, ICTS considers RAPS to be more cost- effective and passenger-friendly than other alternatives available or in development. The concept of risk analysis through passenger screening utilizing a set of criteria has been in use in various forms by certain U.S. carriers since 1986. In 1995, the FAA mandated that all U.S. carriers adopt a uniform methodology of risk analysis through advanced passenger screening at all of the "high-risk" airports in Europe. Previously, security authorities in the Netherlands had adopted such methodology as the standard for enhanced flight-related security for airlines. In April 1996, the United States enacted an anti-terrorism law which mandates that foreign airlines flying to and from airports in the United States adhere to security measures identical to those required of U.S. airlines serving the same airports. In July 1996, as an initial response to the explosion of TWA Flight 800, the FAA issued a "security directive," applicable to all International flights originating in the United States, which requires the implementation of 17
20-F17th Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 17th
certain passenger and cargo classification and verification procedures similar to some of the RAPS procedures. The accumulated know-how and expertise of ICTS in the implementation of RAPS enabled ICTS to develop its APS technology and system. The APS system is an automated computerized system that enables the pre-departure analysis of passenger information and is designed to screen airline passengers in a faster and more efficient manner. The APS system is currently being operated by ICTS under contract for services provided by ICTS Europe, an unaffiliated third party, to major United States airlines on flights from Europe to the United States. Computer Based Training. ICTS provides computer-based software utilized to train X-ray operators to better perform security-related luggage screening. New Technology Initiatives. IP@SS. ICTS has recently launched a trial phase of its IP@SS project. IP@SS consists of a computerized platform integrating various technologies, including document readers, biometrics identification systems and a smart-card. The system is modular and may be used on a stand alone basis or integrated into an existing check-in system. The system has been designed to protect passenger privacy. The system is designed to speed up and simplify the processes of identification and security checks of passengers at airports. The system enhances customer service provided by airlines and airports to outbound passengers. The project is being developed by ICTS and is performed in cooperation with various partners. The pilot program is being tested at Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Buenos Aires Airport, Argentina and at Newark Liberty International Airport, New Jersey in the United States and is planned to be expanded in the near term to other European airports as well as other North American airports. TravelDoc ICTS has designed and developed the TravelDoc system for airlines to quickly scan travel documents, to verify their accuracy and authenticity and to ensure that they fulfill the requirements of the country of destination. The TravelDoc system utilizes a full page scanner, a small computer and an operator screen or can be installed on an existing workstation to meet immigration requirements and reduce fines imposed on the carrier. APIS ICTS has designed and developed a system to assist airlines to meet the requirements of the U.S. Customs Advance Passenger Information System Program. The Security Act requires that all international carriers transmit data to U.S. Customs about passengers and crew members on inbound flights prior to their arrival in the U.S. at high levels of accuracy. ICTS has developed advanced algorithms for scanning passports and visas that 18
20-F18th Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 18th
extracts the information required by U.S. Customs. The system utilizes a full page scanner, a small computer and an operator screen or can be installed on an existing workstation. Consulting, Auditing and Training ICTS provides consulting services to airlines and airports. ICTS recommends the adoption of specified security procedures, develops recruitment and training programs for clients to hire necessary security personnel and works with airport authorities to ensure that they comply with applicable local requirements. ICTS trains airline employees to screen passengers and to perform other security measures through extensive courses and written training manuals. ICTS provides these services in The Netherlands and Russia, but does not expect to derive significant revenues from these services. Airline and Airport Customers In 2002, the TSA accounted for 73% of ICTS's total revenues. In 2002 ICTS had over 400 clients of which eight clients accounted for over 75% of ICTS's revenue, in over 50 locations world-wide. Entertainment Projects ICTS develops tourist attractions combining motion based platforms and synchronized movies and sound effects ("Time Elevators"). ICTS owns a 10% interest in ICTS International Tourist Attractions, Ltd. ("ITA"). ITA is an Israeli based private company established in 1994 which has developed the technology and know how associated with the Time Elevator concept. Ezra Harel and Menachem Atzmon, principal shareholders and the Chairman and a member of the Supervisory Board of ICTS were principal shareholders of ITA until May 2003. See "Related Party Transactions." In connection with its investment in ITA, ICTS was granted the right of first refusal to market and develop the Time Elevator concept in the U.S. and Europe. ICTS is constructing and developing Time Elevator sites in Atlantic City, New Jersey, Baltimore and Maryland and intends to develop on a site in Niagara Falls, New York. ICTS has a 40% interest in Ramasso Holdings BV ("Ramasso"). Ramasso owns and operates a Time Elevator site in Rome, Italy. The other shareholders in Ramasso are ITA (40%) and Ortan (20%) (a company owned and controlled by Mr. Harel and Mr. Atzmon). Marketing and Sales Marketing and Sales in the U.S. In 2002, substantially all of the revenues of ICTS were derived in the U.S. ICTS derived most of its revenues through contracts which were secured by ICTS as a result of competitive bidding. 19
20-F19th Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 19th
Marketing and Sales in The Netherlands. Contracts for aviation security services in The Netherlands are obtained through competitive bids that are issued by the applicable airport authorities or agencies. Marketing of Security Systems and Technology. ICTS intends to market its new technology systems and technologies by establishing pilot projects with airports and airlines. Upon the demonstration of the viability of the systems or technology ICTS intends to develop a marketing plan to distribute the systems and technology. Marketing of Entertainment Activities. ICTS seeks to locate its entertainment sites in areas that enjoy concentrated flows of tourists. It intends to market its sites through advertising and establishing long term relationships with tour and bus operators. Leasing Operation In June 2002 ICTS purchased equipment for an aggregate purchase price of $23.5 million. The purchase price was payable $14.5 million in cash and the balance subject to an $8.5 million self amortizing non-recourse promissory note payable over five years. Pursuant to an operating lease, the equipment was leased to a private Dutch company. The lease provides for annual lease payments in the amount of $2.6 million and an option to purchase the equipment after five or seven years based upon the then fair market value. In the event that the lessee does not exercise the option to purchase the equipment upon the expiration of the lease term, then ICTS will be obligated to pay license fees in connection with intellectual property associated with the equipment in an amount equal to 5% of the revenue derived from the use of the equipment if ICTS exercises its option to operate the equipment. The Company leases premises under long-term operating leases, in most cases with renewal options. Lease expenses for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 were $928, $1,739 and $1,177 respectively. Future minimum lease payments under long-term leases are as follows: December 31, 2002 2003 603 2004 285 2005 205 2006 157 2007 93 1,343 ==== 20
20-F20th Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 20th
Competition Competition in the aviation security industry as well as in the non-security related aviation services industry is intense. Many of our competitors have greater financial, technical and marketing resources. We expect that our competitors will develop and market alternative systems and technologies that may have greater functionality or be more cost effective than the services we provide or the systems that we may develop. If our competitors develop such systems we may not be able to successfully market our systems. Even if we are able to develop systems with greater functionality which are more cost effective than those developed by our competitors, we may not be able to achieve market acceptance of our systems because our competitors have greater financial and marketing resources. Restrictions on Competition In connection with the sale of the European operations ICTS is restricted from conducting business in Europe, (except for The Netherlands and Russia) any of the activities in which ICTS Europe was engaged prior to the sale. This restriction is effective through February 2005. Pursuant to an agreement dated as of July 1, 1995 with ICTS Global Security (1995) Ltd. ICTS may not provide non-aviation security services in Latin America, Turkey or Russia. ICTS Global Security is partially owned by Lior Zouker and Ezra Harel, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman of Supervisory Board of ICTS and a principal shareholder, respectively. Aviation Security Regulatory Matters ICTS aviation security activities are subject to various regulations imposed by authorities and various local and federal agencies having jurisdiction in the serviced area. ICTS on behalf of its clients was responsible for adherence to such regulations relating to certain security aspects of their activities. ICTS is also responsible to prevent passengers without proper travel documentation from boarding a flight, thereby avoiding fines otherwise imposed on its clients by immigration authorities. ICTS is subject to random periodic tests by government authorities with regard to the professional level of its services and training. Any failure to pass such a test may result in the loss of a contract or a license to perform services or a fine or both. In the airports in which ICTS operates in The Netherlands and Russia, a license to operate is required from the respective airport authority. ICTS currently holds the licenses required to operate in such locations. 21
20-F21st Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 21st
Prior to the enactment of the Security Act, the FAA regulated the activities of Huntleigh with respect to security services offered at U.S. airports. Presently such activities are regulated by the FAA and the TSA. In order for ICTS to engage in aviation activities in the U.S. it may be necessary for ICTS to demonstrate that it meets the TSA requirement of being at least 75% owned and controlled by U.S. citizens. Organizational Structure. The following are the significant subsidiaries of ICTS: ICTS USA, Inc., New York - 100% (a) Huntleigh USA Corporation. (Missouri - 100%) (b) Explore USA, Inc. (Delaware - 100%) (i) Explore Atlantic City, LLC (Delaware - 100%) (ii) Explore Baltimore, LLC (Delaware - 100%) (iii) Explore Niagara, LLC (New York - 100%) ICTS Technologies B.V. (The Netherlands - 100%) (a) ICTS Technologies USA, Inc. (Delaware - 100%) ICTS Investment B.V. (The Netherlands - 100%) ICTS Leasing BV (The Netherlands - 100%) Procheck International B.V. (The Netherlands - 100%) Property, Plant and Equipment. The Company leases premises under long-term operating leases, in most cases with renewal options. Lease expenses for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 were $928, $1,739 and $1,177 respectively. Future minimum lease payments under long-term leases are as follows: December 31, 2002 2003 603 2004 285 2005 205 2006 157 2007 93 1,343 ==== 22
20-F22nd Page of 116TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 22nd
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects Operating Results General This section contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 concerning ICTS's business, operations and financial condition. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this annual report on Form 20-F regarding ICTS's strategy, future operations, financial position, costs, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. When used in this annual report on Form 20-F the words "expect", "anticipate", "intend", "plan", "believe", "seek", "estimate", and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements for a number of important reasons, including those discussed under "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F. ICTS cannot guarantee any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. The forward-looking statements contained in this annual report on Form 20-F represent management's expectations as of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F and should not be relied upon as representing ICTS's expectations as of any other date. Subsequent events and developments will cause management's expectations to change. However, while ICTS may elect to update these forward-looking statements, ICTS specifically disclaims any obligation to do so, even if its expectations change. ICTS specializes primarily in the provision of aviation security services. In addition, ICTS provides non-security related aviation services and develops technological systems and solutions for the security market. ICTS also engages in certain other activities, including constructing and developing entertainment related projects. In 2001 and 2002 ICTS sold substantially all of its European operations in two stages, for an aggregate purchase price of $103 million. As a result of the sale, ICTS has fully divested itself from its European operations, except for its operations in The Netherlands and Russia. In the fourth quarter of 2002, pursuant to the Security Act the Federal government through the TSA took over substantially all of the aviation security operations in U.S. airports. As a result, ICTS through its wholly-owned subsidiary Huntleigh USA Corp. ("Huntleigh"), provides limited aviation security services in the United States. 23
20-F23rd Page of