SEC Info  
  Home     Search     My Interests     Help     Sign In     Please Sign In  

Aarp Managed Investment Portfolios ˇ N-30D ˇ For 3/31/00

Filed On 5/26/00 2:57pm ET   ˇ   SEC File 811-07933   ˇ   Accession Number 88053-0-560

  in   Show  and 
Help... Wildcards:  ? (any letter),  * (many).  Logic:  for Docs: (and), (or);  for Text: (anywhere),  "(&)" (near).
  As Of               Filer                 Filing     As/For/On Docs:Pgs              Issuer               Agent

 5/26/00  Aarp Managed Investme..Portfolios N-30D       3/31/00    1:179                                    DWS Int'l Fund/Inc

Annual or Semi-Annual Report Mailed to Shareholders   ˇ   Rule 30d-1
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: N-30D       Semiannual Report - Aarp Managed Investment Port.    179    708K 


Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page
4Mid-Year Review
19AARP High Quality Money Fund
20AARP High Quality Tax Free Money Fund
21AARP Premium Money Fund
22AARP High Quality Short Term Bond Fund
"Total Return
24AARP GNMA and U.S. Treasury Fund
26AARP Insured Tax Free General Bond Fund
28AARP Bond Fund for Income
30AARP Balanced Stock and Bond Fund
32AARP Growth and Income Fund
36AARP U.S. Stock Index Fund
38AARP Capital Growth Fund
40AARP Small Company Stock Fund
42AARP Global Growth Fund
44AARP International Stock Fund
49Investment Portfolios
82Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
"Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc
"American Home Products Corp
83AT&T Corp
"Chase Manhattan Corp
"American International Group, Inc
"American Express Co
"Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc
"Walt Disney Co
"Electronic Data Systems Corp
84McGraw-Hill, Inc
"Rockwell International Corp
"Ford Motor Co
"Deere & Co
"General Electric Co
"Corning, Inc
"Parker-Hannifin Corp
"Compaq Computer Corp
"Exxon Mobil Corp
85Chevron Corp
"Schlumberger Ltd
"Alcoa, Inc
"FPL Group, Inc
86PepsiCo, Inc
"Becton, Dickinson & Co
128AARP Diversified Growth Portfolio
129Financial Statements
147Financial Highlights
157Notes to Financial Statements
166Net unrealized appreciation
169Officers and Trustees
173Investor Services
177Glossary
N-30D1st Page of 179TOCTopPreviousNextBottomJust 1st
 
Sponsored Ads...

[logo] AARP Investment Program from SCUDDER Our Commitment To AARP Members Keeps Growing. 2 0 0 0 Mid-Year Report to Shareholders --------------------------------------------------- VISIT OUR FINANCIAL LIBRARY AT AARP.SCUDDER.COM --------------------------------------------------- be ready
N-30D2nd Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 2nd
How to Contact the AARP Investment Program WebSite aarp.scudder.com ----------------------------------------------------------------- Visit us at our Internet Web site for the latest updates and information from the AARP Investment Program from Scudder. Visitors have access to a broad range of investment information, including performance of AARP Mutual Funds, which is updated daily, and the complete prospectus. Easy-Access Line 1-800-631-4636 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Shareholders with a touch-tone telephone may call this automated line to obtain AARP fund performance and account information, or to exchange or sell (redeem) AARP fund shares. This service is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Shareholder Service Line 1-800-253-2277 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Our knowledgeable AARP Mutual Fund Representatives are available to answer your questions regarding the AARP Investment Program, or your account, Monday through Friday, between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Eastern time. Transactions can be made Monday through Friday, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern time. Transactions by Fax 1-800-821-6234 ----------------------------------------------------------------- You can fax your confidential transaction requests to us. Please note that any exchange or redemption request received after 4:00 p.m. Eastern time on business days or on weekends will be processed on the next business day. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf and Speech Impaired (TDD) Line 1-800-634-9454 ----------------------------------------------------------------- AARP members with hearing or speech impairments and access to TDD equipment can communicate with the AARP Investment Program Monday through Friday, between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Eastern time. Transactions can be made between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern time on business days. Mailing Address ----------------------------------------------------------------- AARP Investment Program from Scudder P.O. Box 2540 Boston, MA 02208-2540 Certified, Registered, and Overnight Delivery Address ----------------------------------------------------------------- AARP Investment Program from Scudder 66 Brooks Drive Braintree, MA 02184 E-mail Address ----------------------------------------------------------------- AARP_Funds@scudder.com
N-30D3rd Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 3rd
Table of Contents Mid-Year Review -- A Message from Linda C. Coughlin ........ 2 /1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Investment Performance and Individual Portfolio Reviews .... 7 /2/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Investment Performance for the six-month period ...... 8 MONEY MARKET FUNDS AARP High Quality Money Fund ......................... 17 AARP High Quality Tax Free Money Fund ................ 18 AARP Premium Money Fund .............................. 19 INC0ME FUNDS AARP High Quality Short Term Bond Fund ............... 20 AARP GNMA and U.S. Treasury Fund ..................... 22 AARP Insured Tax Free General Bond Fund .............. 24 AARP Bond Fund for Income ............................ 26 GROWTH AND INCOME FUNDS AARP Balanced Stock and Bond Fund .................... 28 AARP Growth and Income Fund .......................... 30 AARP U.S. Stock Index Fund ........................... 34 GROWTH FUNDS AARP Capital Growth Fund ............................. 36 AARP Small Company Stock Fund ........................ 38 GLOBAL FUNDS AARP Global Growth Fund .............................. 40 AARP International Stock Fund (formerly AARP International Growth and Income Fund) 42 MANAGED INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS AARP Diversified Income with Growth Portfolio ........ 44 AARP Diversified Growth Portfolio .................... 44 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS ...................................... 47 /3/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ....................................... 127 /4/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS ....................................... 145 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS .............................. 155 OFFICERS AND TRUSTEES ...................................... 167 /5/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ INVESTOR SERVICES .......................................... 172 /6/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ GLOSSARY ................................................... 175 /7/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------
N-30D4th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 4th
/1/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [logo] AARP Investment Program from SCUDDER Mid-Year Review THE PRINTED DOCUMENT A Message from Linda C. Coughlin, Chairperson CONTAINS A PHOTOGRAPH AARP Investment Program from Scudder OF LINDA C. COUGHLIN HERE Dear Fellow Shareholder, In this letter I would like to address three important issues that affect the AARP Investment Program from Scudder: fund performance, an Linda C. Coughlin expansion of the Investment Program, and the high Chairperson volume of calls we've received this spring. The last six months rewarded some investments that focused on a few sectors with exceptional returns. Technology and biotechnology stocks were among these leaders. While many of these high-fliers have fallen sharply since the close of the fiscal period, many investors pursuing diversified, conservative, and lower-risk investment strategies -- such as the AARP Investment Program funds -- experienced disappointing returns. These conditions proved especially challenging for value-oriented funds. In the case of the AARP Growth and Income Fund, we are pleased to report that an enhanced investment strategy and a change in the market environment helped the fund significantly narrow the gap versus its benchmark index during the first three months of this year. The story was similar for the AARP Small Company Stock Fund: Small-cap stocks outperformed large-cap stocks for the six months, but the sector was driven by the exceptional gains of a few small growth stocks. The fund's discipline, which emphasizes small-cap stocks with solid fundamentals selling at attractive prices, was severely out of favor during this period. While the six months proved challenging for these funds, it rewarded others, especially AARP Capital Growth Fund, AARP U.S. Stock Index Fund, and AARP International Stock Fund. These funds turned in solid performances for the period ended March 31, 2000. We know that fund performance is important to you and that we must consistently meet or exceed your expectations. We believe that we can meet those expectations over the long-term, especially given recent enhancements to selected funds and the changed market environment since the end of the period. WIDER SELECTION OF FUNDS This year we are taking another step with the AARP Investment Program by dramatically expanding the products and services available to shareholders. Part of expanding the Investment Program's fund choices requires a special shareholder meeting, which will take place in July 2000. As a shareholder in the AARP Investment Program funds you are being asked 2
N-30D5th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 5th
to vote on several proposals relating to this expansion. By now you should have received shareholder meeting ("proxy") materials describing the proposals along with a proxy card to cast your vote. The Investment Program's Board of Trustees has approved these proposals and recommends that you vote in favor of them. Under the proposals, AARP members will be offered a wider range of funds to meet a broader range of investment goals (see summary on page 8). The current offering of 16 mutual funds will expand to include 43 funds, including six that will maintain a risk-managed focus. We will accomplish this by making funds from the Scudder family of funds available to AARP members. In addition and subject to shareholder approval, AARP and Scudder funds with similar objectives will be combined. The resulting funds will be called Scudder funds, with AARP Investment Program shareholders' shares designated "Class AARP" at the end of the fund name, e.g., "Scudder Growth and Income Fund -- Class AARP." The renaming denotes Scudder's distinct role in managing the funds and your special privileges as an investor in the AARP Investment Program. While you may receive more than one account statement during the transition period this summer, investment activity on all of your fund holdings will be reported on a single consolidated AARP Investment Program statement when the expansion is completed. In addition, we will continue to offer all funds available through the Investment Program on a no-load basis. AARP'S CONTINUING COMMITMENT TO YOU The involvement and level of participation from AARP in the AARP Investment Program is not changing. AARP, through a subsidiary, will continue to oversee the Investment Program's service quality and communications. This subsidiary will provide insight and direction based on what it believes will best serve the interests and concerns of AARP members. Part of the ongoing involvement of AARP includes their continued representation on the funds' Board of Trustees. MID-YEAR AND ANNUAL REPORTS After these changes are approved by shareholders, fund specific information -- such as performance, portfolio manager discussions, portfolio holdings, and financial statement information -- will be provided through individual Scudder fund reports. These existing reports focus on one or a few related funds and are mailed at different times throughout the year. The individual fund reports provide detailed information about your fund(s) and will replace the 200-page AARP Mid-Year and Annual Reports, such as this report. We will continue to keep you updated on products, services, and topics of interest through a number of publications, including newsletters and the AARP Investment Program Web site -- aarp.scudder.com. We will also publish periodic reviews that will update you on Investment Program developments. As before the expansion, we will continue to provide you with education on investment topics affecting your life -- an approach we believe is one of the cornerstones of the AARP Investment Program. We are excited about the expansion of the AARP Investment Program, a development that will provide you with more investment choices. In addition, we will be introducing other 3
N-30D6th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 6th
services this year that should help you better manage your financial affairs. Our commitment to shareholders is stronger than ever, and we hope that you will find the expanded choices useful. As with any change of this type, you may have questions. For answers, I encourage you to review the contact list on the inside front cover of this report, or visit our Internet Web site at aarp.scudder.com (click on "News"). There you'll find the most up-to-date information about the proposed changes. Of course, you can also call one of our representatives to discuss any of these issues. CALLING US In closing, I would like to thank you for your patience and support if you have tried to contact us by telephone recently and have experienced an unusually long delay. We know that some of you have had an unacceptable experience, and we offer our sincerest apologies. The situation is the result of an unprecedented number of calls during concentrated periods and job market conditions that have challenged our ability to hire additional representatives swiftly. Let me assure you that we have taken significant steps to restore our responsiveness, including the hiring of more AARP Investment Program representatives. In addition, our existing AARP Investment Program representatives have agreed to take shorter lunch breaks, work overtime each business day, and work weekends. Our representatives from other Scudder phone groups also have offered their assistance in answering calls. Even with these best efforts, some of you have had to wait longer than you are accustomed. To assist you with reaching a representative, you may want to avoid calling during our busiest times. Our representatives are busiest on Mondays and Tuesdays between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern time. In order to reach a representative sooner, we suggest that you call during the following periods: o Wednesday through Friday between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Eastern time o Saturdays between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. Eastern time o Monday and Tuesday between 4:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. Eastern time Thank you again for your understanding during this extraordinary period. Our hope is that you have begun to experience an improvement in our responsiveness by the time you receive this letter. For other ways to contact us, please turn to the inside front cover of this report. Please know that we value your relationship and that my colleagues and I are extremely committed to providing you with the highest quality service possible in keeping with your expectations and our standards. Sincerely, /s/Lin Coughlin Linda C. Coughlin Chairperson 4
N-30D7th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 7th
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPOSED CHANGES o Expand the current offering from 16 to 43 no-load funds o Combine AARP Investment Program funds and Scudder funds that have similar investment objectives (except for AARP Capital Growth Fund, which will not be combined with another fund) o Rename funds to denote Scudder's distinct role in managing the funds and the special privileges for AARP shareholders (e.g., "Scudder Growth and Income Fund -- Class AARP") o Consolidate the multiple fund Boards of Trustees that exist across the AARP and Scudder funds into one consolidated Board with broad business experience, specific expertise in mutual fund matters, and representation from AARP AARP INVESTMENT PROGRAM BENEFITS o Continuing commitment to education through efforts such as our Financial Library, Legacy ServiceSM, and national seminar program o A dedicated Internet Web site -- aarp.scudder.com -- providing up-to-date news and information pertaining specifically to the AARP Investment Program o AARP, through its subsidiary, will continue to oversee service levels and communications for AARP Investment Program shareholders and AARP members o Continued availability of a series of six risk-managed funds o Through our ongoing relationship with AARP, Scudder will introduce new products and services that help meet the needs of AARP members o Pay no sales charges or commissions on Scudder funds while enjoying low investment minimums and our No-Fee IRA -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5
N-30D8th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 8th
This page intentionally left blank. 6
N-30D9th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 9th
/2/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I N V E S T M E N T P E R F O R M A N C E Cornelia Small, President and Investment Director of the AARP Investment Program from Scudder, begins this section with an overview of the financial markets and fund performance for the six-month period ended March 31, 2000. Some of the investment terms used in various reviews require additional explanation. We have highlighted in bold italics certain words which appear in the Glossary which begins on page 175. We hope this helps you to better understand the commentary. 7
N-30D10th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 10th
Investment Performance For the six-month period ended March 31, 2000 Cornelia Small, President and Investment Director AARP Investment Program from Scudder Dear Fellow Shareholder: After dominating the U.S. market returns for THE PRINTED DOCUMENT more than two years, a select group of high growth CONTAINS A PHOTOGRAPH stocks began to lose favor in March. While OF CORNELIA SMALL investor sentiment shifted to companies with HERE demonstrated earnings and solid fundamentals, growth stocks still outdistanced most other asset classes by a wide margin for the six-month period. Over the last couple of years growth stocks (stocks with accelerating earnings, revenues, or sales) have provided investors with outstanding Cornelia Small gains. During the six months, investors flocked to President and growth stocks of all sizes, causing prices to rise Investment Director to unprecedented heights. Technology and biotechnology companies were among the best performing growth stocks, as these companies have been among the fastest growing. This helped technology-related indices to gain more than 60% for the six-month period. However, most professional money managers believed that these levels defied traditional methods of valuing a company and, ultimately, were unsupportable. In sharp contrast, the majority of stocks have actually fallen during this period. Among the weakest performing segments were value stocks (stocks that are selling at attractive levels). These have trailed growth stocks and the broad market averages such as the unmanaged S&P 500 Index. This situation has confounded investors with diversified portfolios as their returns have trailed the staggering gains of tech and biotech stocks. Yet, hidden in the temptation to invest in these sectors are the greater risks associated with high growth stocks. Shortly after the close of the period, some of those risks were realized as many of these high fliers experienced devastating losses. In our view, the realignment comes as a welcome relief for the overall market. While the level of the U.S. stock market remained above-average given our current earnings projections, the price declines since the end of the period have removed a substantial amount of risk from some of the most highly-valued stocks. With stock prices at more reasonable levels and the economy still healthy, our longer-term outlook for the stock markets has actually improved. 8
N-30D11th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 11th
THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A BAR CHART HERE BAR CHART TITLE: THE STOCK MARKETS CHART PERIOD: As of March 31, 2000 CHART DATA: Index Six-month total return ----- ---------------------- Technology Stocks (price only) 85.15% Nasdaq Composite (price only) 66.52% Small-cap growth stocks 45.77% MSCI Latin America 37.10% Large-cap growth stocks 34.06% MSCI World (excl. U.S.) 18.06% S&P 500 17.52% MSCI Europe 17.48% MSCI Japan 16.52% MSCI Pacific Free (excl. Japan) 15.11% Large-cap value stocks 5.94% Small-cap value stocks 5.41% CAPTION TO PRECEDING CHART: All indices are unmanaged, market-capitalization-weighted, and in U.S. dollars for the six-month period. Unlike mutual funds, index returns do not reflect management fees and expenses. The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based index of large U.S. stocks; large-cap growth stocks are represented by the Russell 1000 Growth Index; large-cap value stocks are represented by the Russell 1000 Value Index; small-cap growth stocks are represented by the Russell 2000 Growth Index; small-cap value stocks are represented by the Russell 2000 Value Index; and technology stocks are represented by the Pacific Stock Exchange Technology Index. The MSCI (Morgan Stanley Capital International) World (excluding U.S.) Index is a broad-based index of international stocks. ----- However, the market environment is still likely to be filled with price volatility. The powerful growth of the U.S. economy has raised fears that tight labor markets and high levels of consumer confidence will cause the demand for goods and services to outstrip the available supply. This could result in accelerating inflation. To counteract the threat of inflation, the Federal Reserve has raised short-term interest rates five times since June of 1999. To date, the increases have had little effect on slowing the economy, raising expectations that several more increases will be necessary to dampen potential inflation pressures. Higher interest rates simply have reduced the attractiveness of stocks. As a result, investors have focused on stocks that were believed least affected by rate increases, mainly stocks with the highest growth rates. Until recently, these fast growing companies have been among the best performers, but all investments have their limits. After the close of the fiscal period on March 31, high growth stocks -- which had the furthest to fall -- continued to decline sharply as investors seemed to prefer companies with solid financial statements and relatively lower prices for their stocks. While the booming U.S. economy has provided an excellent backdrop for growth stocks, it has been a distinct negative for bonds. In an environment where confidence is high, energy prices are rising, and gross domestic product is strong, it is natural that bond prices -- 9
N-30D12th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 12th
THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A BAR CHART HERE BAR CHART TITLE: THE BOND MARKETS CHART PERIOD: As of March 31, 2000 CHART DATA: Index Six-month total return ----- ---------------------- Merrill Lynch 3-Month Treasury Bill 2.66% Lehman Bros. Municipal Bond 2.12% Lehman Bros. Aggregate 2.08% Merrill Lynch Mortgage 1.74% Lehman Bros. Government Bond (Intermediate) 1.59% Lehman Bros. Corporate Bond (Intermediate) 1.51% Lehman Bros. High Yield Bond -0.74% CAPTION TO PRECEDING CHART: Unlike mutual funds, indices are unmanaged and returns do not reflect management fees and expenses. The Lehman Brothers High Yield Bond Index is a broad-based index of below investment grade bonds. The Lehman Brothers GNMA Index is a broad-based index of GNMA securities. The Lehman Brothers Corporate Bond Index is a broad-based index of intermediate-term corporate bonds. The Lehman Brothers Aggregate Index is a broad-based index of U.S. investment grade bonds. The Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index is a broad-based index of municipal bonds. The Lehman Brothers Government Bond Index is a broad-based index of intermediate-term U.S. government debt obligations. ----- which tend to thrive when the economy is slowing -- would experience weakness. These factors were reflected in the performance of the 30-year Treasury bond yield, which rose from 6.05% at the beginning of the six-month period to a high of 6.75% by January 18, 2000.(Bond yields typically move in the opposite direction of bond prices.) The upward climb in bond yields was interrupted in early February when the U.S. Treasury announced plans to buy back existing bonds and curtail its issuance of new bonds in order to reduce the national debt. Believing that the Treasury would focus its efforts on longer-term bonds, investors rushed into that sector of the market to capitalize on the shrinking supply. This drove up bond prices and caused the yield on the 30-year bond to plunge to 5.83% by the end of the period. Other sectors of the bond market -- such as corporates and mortgage-backed securities -- were disrupted by the volatility in government bonds, but still managed to outperform over the full six months. The overseas markets have tracked the U.S. fairly closely in the sense that technology, media, and telecommunications shares ("TMT stocks") have produced the best returns while other industry sectors have lagged. This trend has held true in both the major markets as well as the developing countries, and underscores the fact that the explosive growth of technology is a global phenomenon. The major European markets staged a powerful rally beginning in 10
N-30D13th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 13th
mid-October that extended into the new year, driving the German equity market to a gain of 33% and the market in France to an advance of 25%. In Japan, stocks continued to grind higher behind strength in the country's tech sector, but the ongoing questions surrounding the state of the country's economy limited gains to 17% for the six months. Most of the emerging markets performed very well on the strength of a sharp run-up in the final two months of 1999. Despite the strong gains in the international markets, we are continuing to find plentiful opportunities there that take advantage of important long-term trends, such as restructuring on the corporate level and industry consolidations. We expect that the wealth of positive changes emerging on the corporate level will continue to provide excellent stockpicking opportunities. OVERVIEW OF AARP FUND PERFORMANCE AARP Capital Growth Fund and AARP U.S. Stock Index Fund continued to provide strong performance in the domestic equity area, due in part to their significant exposure to the best performing areas, specifically growth and technology stocks. AARP Capital Growth Fund's 28.25% six-month return reflects our "growth at a reasonable price" investment discipline and the fund's investment in many dominant, well-run companies. This approach contributed to the fund's ranking among the top 6% of 424 large-cap core funds for the one-year period according to Lipper.^1 AARP U.S. Stock Index Fund, which seeks to mirror the performance of the S&P 500 with less risk than other index funds by emphasizing dividend-paying stocks, essentially matched the performance of its benchmark with a 17.45% six-month return. In addition, both funds earned overall 4-star Morningstar Ratings(TM) among 3,571 domestic equity funds as of March 31, 2000.^2 Reflecting a resurgence of value stocks toward the end of the period and the implementation of a broadened investment strategy last year, AARP Growth and Income Fund significantly narrowed the gap on its benchmark, especially during the final three months of the period. AARP Balanced Stock and Bond Fund, which pursues the same investment strategy as AARP Growth and Income Fund in the equity portion of its portfolio, also benefited. While these two funds do not invest in many of the high-priced and high-risk stocks that dominated market performance during the first five months of the period, we are encouraged by the funds' improving performance. Among small-cap stocks, the gulf between the performance of growth and value stocks continued to widen. Small growth stocks returned 45.77%, while small value stocks returned ---------- ^1 Source: Lipper Analytical Services, Inc., an independent analyst of investment performance. Performance includes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. As of 3/31/00, AARP Capital Growth Fund ranked in the top 6% of 424 funds for the one-year period, in the top 9% of 231 funds for the five-year period, and in the top 40% of 54 funds for the ten-year period. ^2 Morningstar proprietary ratings reflect historical risk-adjusted performance through 3/31/00. The ratings are subject to change every month. Morningstar ratings are calculated from the fund's three-, five-, and ten-year returns (with fee adjustments) in excess of 90-day Treasury bill returns, and a risk factor that reflects fund performance below 90-day T-bill returns. AARP Capital Growth Fund received four stars for the three- and five-year periods. AARP U.S. Stock Index Fund received four stars for the three-year period. In their broad asset class these funds were ranked among 3571, 2283, and 786 domestic equity funds, for the three-, five-, and ten-year periods, respectively. The top 10% of funds in this broad asset class receive five stars and the next 22.5% receive four stars. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. 11
N-30D14th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 14th
just 5.41%. AARP Small Company Stock Fund's emphasis on attractively valued stocks with smaller market capitalizations than its benchmark was a significant limitation to its short-term performance. Recently the fund has broadened its exposure to include more growth stocks in addition to its traditional value stock holdings, which has helped performance. However, substantial gains were concentrated among a few of the largest growth stocks in the fund's investment universe -- a significant disadvantage to the fund's diversified approach. Despite this recent performance, we continue to believe that this fund can offer shareholders competitive returns and important exposure to one of the more attractively valued asset classes over the long term. The Investment Program's global and international funds provided some of the best returns, as many overseas markets outperformed the U.S. market for the six-month period. Reflecting this strong performance, AARP Global Growth Fund returned 19.58% and AARP International Stock Fund (formerly AARP International Growth and Income Fund) returned 27.24%, putting the latter ahead of the average international fund according to Lipper.^3 Overall, interest rates continued to climb during the period causing price declines for most fixed income investors. However, fixed income securities with the shortest durations -- such as money market funds and short-term bond funds -- weathered this period better than other sectors. While all of our money market funds adhere to strict quality guidelines, AARP Premium Money Market Fund earned high honors by ranking among the top 9% of 368 taxable money market funds for the one-year period according to Lipper.^4 Despite the headwind of rising rates for funds with longer durations, AARP High Quality Short Term Bond Fund and AARP GNMA and U.S. Treasury Fund continued to add to their long-term performance records with overall 4-star Morningstar Ratings(TM) for their risk-adjusted returns (among 1,680 taxable bond funds as of March 31, 2000).^5 Reflecting an improving performance trend for AARP GNMA and U.S. Treasury Fund, which is generally more exposed to the rising rate environment than AARP High Quality Short Term Bond Fund, the fund ranked among the top 23% of 56 GNMA funds according to Lipper.^6 IN PERSPECTIVE With the U.S. stock market pulling back sharply in the first few weeks of the second quarter, it appears that the signs of a shift in investor sentiment are continuing to work their way through the market. Given these conditions and the Federal Reserve's continuing bias ---------- ^3 As of 3/31/00, AARP International Stock Fund ranked in the top 37% of 643 funds for the one-year period and in the top 44% of 423 funds for the three-year period. See footnote 1 for additional information. ^4 As of 3/31/00, AARP Premium Money Market Fund ranked in the top 9% of 368 funds for the one-year period. See footnote 1 for additional information. ^5 AARP High Quality Short Term Bond Fund and AARP GNMA & U.S. Treasury Fund both received four stars for the three- and five-year periods and three stars for the ten-year period among 1680, 1279, and 389 taxable bond funds in its broad asset class, respectively. See footnote 2 for additional information. ^6 As of 3/31/00, AARP GNMA and U.S. Treasury Fund ranked in the top 23% of 56 funds for the one-year period, in the top 75% of funds for the five-year period, and in the top 76% of 24 funds for the ten-year period. See footnote 1 for additional information. 12
N-30D15th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 15th
toward raising interest rates to slow growth and head off inflation, we believe shareholders should expect increased market volatility in the near term. On the plus side, we think lower stock prices help to reduce the market's overall risk, and may contribute to improved market stability over the long term. While the daily ups and downs of the stock and bond markets may continue to make headlines in the next few months, we continue to believe that there are many attractive opportunities for investors, especially in selected overseas markets. Our portfolio managers strive to capitalize on the best opportunities, whether they are found at home or abroad, or in stocks or in bonds. In the months ahead they will continue to seek out the most promising securities that meet the goals and risk requirements of their respective funds. Thank you for your continued support of the AARP Investment Program from Scudder. Sincerely, /s/Cornelia Small Cornelia Small President and Investment Director -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The mention of individual securities in this report should not be deemed a recommendation. 13
N-30D16th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 16th
This page intentionally left blank. 14
N-30D17th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 17th
I N D I V I D U A L P O R T F O L I O R E V I E W S Individual Portfolio Reviews for each AARP fund detail the individual fund objective, performance, portfolio composition, asset allocation, and sector diversification. In addition, each portfolio management team comments on how its fund performed during the period in relation to the market. Some investment terms require additional explanation. These terms are highlighted in bold italics throughout the report and appear in the Glossary beginning on page 175. We hope this helps you to better understand the Individual Portfolio Reviews. 15
N-30D18th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 18th
This page intentionally left blank. 16
N-30D19th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 19th
AARP HIGH QUALITY MONEY FUND ---------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: GOAL The fund seeks to provide current income and liquidity, consistent with stability and safety of principal, while maintaining a constant share price of $1. The fund pursues its goal by investing principally in short-term debt securities issued by U.S. corporations and financial institutions, and the U.S. government and its agencies. FOR WHOM THE FUND IS DESIGNED This fund may be appropriate for investors who have short-term needs or who do not want the risks associated with investing in stocks or bonds. These investors include those seeking income to help meet regular day-to-day needs, those who need immediate access to their assets through free checkwriting, those who want to diversify their investments with an investment designed to provide a degree of safety and stability, and those seeking a short-term investment prior to making longer-term investment choices. PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT TEAM Frank J. Rachwalski, Jr. Lead Portfolio Manager Jerri I. Cohen Portfolio Manager * It is the policy of the fund not to invest in taxable issues. However, the fund's income may be subject to state and local taxes. Capital gains may be subject to taxes as well. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INVESTMENT STRATEGY The performance of the AARP High Quality Money Fund reflected the movement of short-term interest rates over the six-month period ended March 31, 2000. After permitting short-term interest rates to subside at the close of 1999 to ensure adequate liquidity during the Y2K date changeover, the Federal Reserve resumed raising the federal funds rate in February and March 2000 (to 6.00%) to try to temper the U.S. economic boom and restrain inflation. Excepting a brief period at year-end 1999 when we extended maturity to capture attractive yields for maturities beyond January 2000, we have maintained a conservative stance (a relatively short portfolio maturity) in order to be able to take advantage of the higher yields we expect later this year. All securities purchased during the period were rated within the two highest quality ranges of at least one of the three leading national independent rating firms: Fitch Investors Service, Inc., Moody's Investors Service, Inc., or Standard & Poor's Corporation (S&P). We also complied with the guidelines to maintain a AAAm rating from S&P, the highest rating available (approximately 5% of money funds are rated, which provides an added degree of assurance for discriminating investors).^1 Within the universe of securities that meet S&P criteria, Scudder Kemper credit analysts adhere to even stricter guidelines, approving only a small percentage. Thus, the universe of securities from which we construct the fund's portfolio is smaller and generally of better quality than most other money market funds. OUTLOOK Until we feel that the Fed has completed its most recent round of interest rate increases, we expect to maintain an average maturity of between 20 and 30 days. In the current economic environment, the fund is expected to meet its goal of current income and liquidity with a high degree of safety. PORTFOLIO STATISTICS Number of Issues .............23 7-Day Current Yield .......5.01% Average Maturity ........18 Days Average Quality ............AAAm PORTFOLIO RETURNS One-Year Cumulative Total Return ..............4.69% Five-Year Average Annual Total Return .......4.73% Ten-Year Average Annual Total Return .......4.51% Five-Year Cumulative Total Return .............26.02% Ten-Year Cumulative Total Return .............55.40% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ^1 The rating for the fund is historical and is based on an analysis of the Portfolio's credit quality, market price exposure, and management. The adviser has agreed to maintain expenses until 1/31/01. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The fund's yield will fluctuate with market conditions. An investment in this fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Although the fund strives to maintain a $1 share price, it is possible that you could lose money by investing in the fund. 17
N-30D20th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 20th
AARP HIGH QUALITY TAX FREE MONEY FUND ------------------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: GOAL The fund seeks to provide liquidity and current income that is free from federal income tax,* consistent with stability and safety of principal, while maintaining a constant share price of $1. The fund pursues its goal by investing at least 80% of assets in tax-exempt, short-term municipal securities. FOR WHOM THE FUND IS DESIGNED This fund may be appropriate for investors seeking tax-free income or those who do not want the risks associated with investing in stocks or bonds. These investors include those seeking tax-free money market income to meet regular day-to-day expenses, those needing immediate access to their assets through free checkwriting, those creating a diversified portfolio who want a portion of their assets in a conservative investment designed to offer stability, and those seeking a short-term investment prior to making longer-term investment choices. PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT TEAM Frank J. Rachwalski, Jr. Lead Portfolio Manager Jerri I. Cohen Portfolio Manager -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INVESTMENT STRATEGY The performance of the AARP High Quality Tax Free Money Fund reflected the movement of short-term interest rates over the six-month period ended March 31, 2000. After permitting short-term interest rates to subside at the end of 1999 to ensure adequate liquidity during the Y2K date changeover, the Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate two times through the close of the period (to 6.00%) to try to temper the U.S. economic boom and restrain inflation. Excepting a brief period at year-end 1999 when we extended maturity to capture attractive yields for maturities beyond January 2000, we have maintained a conservative stance (a relatively short portfolio maturity) in order to be able to take advantage of the higher yields we expect will be available later this year. All securities purchased during the period were rated within the two highest quality ranges of at least one of the three leading national independent rating firms: Fitch Investors Service, Inc., Moody's Investors Service, Inc., or Standard & Poor's Corporation (S&P). We also complied with the guidelines to maintain a AAAm rating from S&P, the highest rating available (approximately 5% of money funds are rated AAAm, which provides an added degree of assurance for discriminating investors).^1 Within the universe of securities that meet S&P criteria, Scudder Kemper credit analysts adhere to even stricter guidelines, approving only a small percentage. Thus, the universe of securities from which we construct the fund's portfolio is smaller and generally of better quality than most other tax-free money market funds. OUTLOOK Until we feel that the Fed has completed its most recent round of interest rate increases, we expect to maintain an average maturity of between 20 and 30 days. In the current economic environment, the fund is expected to meet its goal of liquidity and current income with a high degree of safety. PORTFOLIO STATISTICS Number of Issues .......... 53 7-Day Current Yield .....2.96% Average Maturity ......20 Days Average Quality ..........AAAm PORTFOLIO RETURNS One-Year Cumulative Total Return ............2.68% Five-Year Average Annual Total Return .....2.76% Ten-Year Average Annual Total Return .....3.01% Five-Year Cumulative Total Return ...........14.59% Ten-Year Cumulative Total Return ...........34.58% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ^1 The rating for the fund is historical and is based on an analysis of the portfolio's credit quality, market price exposure, and management. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The fund's yield will fluctuate with market conditions. An investment in this fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Although the fund strives to maintain a $1 share price, it is possible that you could lose money by investing in the fund. 18
N-30D21st Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 21st
AARP PREMIUM MONEY FUND ----------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: GOAL The fund seeks to provide high current income and liquidity, consistent with stability and safety of principal, while maintaining a constant share price of $1. The fund pursues its goal by investing in short-term debt securities issued by U.S. corporations and financial institutions, and the U.S. government and its agencies. FOR WHOM THE FUND IS DESIGNED This fund may be appropriate for investors who have short-term needs or who do not want the risks associated with investing in stocks or bonds. These investors include those seeking income to help meet regular day-to-day needs, those who need immediate access to their assets through free checkwriting, those who want to diversify their investments with an investment designed to provide a degree of safety and stability, and those seeking a short-term investment prior to making longer-term investment choices. PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT TEAM Frank J. Rachwalski, Jr. Lead Portfolio Manager Jerri I. Cohen Portfolio Manager -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The AARP Premium Money Fund seeks higher yields than the AARP High Quality Money Fund primarily through a lower expense structure, made possible by a higher investment minimum. FUND PERFORMANCE The performance of the AARP Premium Money Fund reflected the movement of short-term interest rates over the six-month period ended March 31, 2000. After permitting short-term interest rates to subside at the close of 1999 to ensure adequate liquidity during the Y2K date changeover, the Federal Reserve resumed raising the federal funds rate in February and March 2000 (to 6.00%) to try to temper the U.S. economic boom and restrain inflation. Excepting a brief period at year-end 1999 when we extended maturity to capture attractive yields for maturities beyond January 2000, we have maintained a conservative stance (a relatively short portfolio maturity) in order to be able to take advantage of the higher yields we expect will be available later this year. While the fund has slightly more flexibility to invest in a broader range of money market securities than the AARP High Quality Money Fund, we purchased only securities rated within the highest rating categories of at least one of the three leading national statistical rating organizations: Fitch Investors Service, Inc., Moody's Investors Service, Inc., or Standard & Poor's Corporation (S&P). Within the universe of securities that meet the fund's eligibility requirements for purchase, we adhered to even stricter guidelines, approving only a small percentage. Thus, the universe of securities from which the fund's portfolio is constructed is limited to highly creditworthy issues with a proven ability to repay their debt. OUTLOOK Until we feel that the Fed has completed its most recent round of interest rate increases, we expect to maintain an average maturity of between 20 and 30 days. In the current economic environment, the fund is expected to meet its goal of high current income and liquidity with a high degree of safety. PORTFOLIO STATISTICS Number of Issues ...........34 7-Day Current Yield .....5.65%^1 Average Maturity ......30 Days -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ^1 Fund expenses are being maintained until 1/31/01. Without such maintenance, the yield for the AARP Premium Money Fund would have been 5.47%. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The fund's yield will fluctuate with market conditions. An investment in this fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Although the fund strives to maintain a $1 share price, it is possible that you could lose money by investing in the fund. 19
N-30D22nd Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 22nd
AARP HIGH QUALITY SHORT TERM BOND FUND -------------------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: GOAL The fund seeks to produce a high level of current income while actively seeking to reduce downside risk as compared with other short-term bond mutual funds. The fund pursues its goal by investing principally in short-term debt securities and by maintaining a weighted average portfolio duration of less than three years. The fund modified its investment objective on February 1, 1998 and changed its name from the AARP High Quality Bond Fund. The previous objective was to invest in high quality securities regardless of maturity length. PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT TEAM Robert S. Cessine John E. Dugenske Co-Lead Portfolio Managers -------------------------- TOTAL RETURN As of March 31, 2000 CUMULATIVE FUND INDEX++ -------------------------- 1 yr. 2.79% 3.28% 5 yr. 35.89% 33.98% 10 yr. 100.23% 90.28% AVERAGE ANNUAL FUND INDEX++ -------------------------- 1 yr. 2.79% 3.28% 5 yr. 6.33% 6.02% 10 yr. 7.19% 6.64% -------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The past six months has been a difficult period for the bond market, as strong growth, tight labor markets, and higher energy prices have forced the Federal Reserve to raise short-term interest rates five times since June of 1999. In the Treasury market, short-term issues were battered by these trends, while long-term bonds were boosted by the government's announcement of a plan to cut the supply of outstanding debt. Outside of the Treasury sector, this relationship was reversed -- short-term bonds provided more stable performance than longer-term issues. Since we invest the vast majority of the portfolio outside of the Treasury sector, the fund was relatively well-positioned for the unfavorable environment. THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A LINE CHART HERE LINE CHART TITLE: Growth of a $10,000 Investment CHART PERIOD: Yearly Periods ended March 31, 2000 CHART DATA: SALOMON BROTHERS INC. AARP HIGH QUALITY LEHMAN BROTHERS TREASURY/GOVERNMENT SHORT TERM BOND AGGREGATE BOND SPONSORED CORPORATE FUND INDEX+ INDEX (1-3 YEARS)++ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1990 $10000 $10000 $10000 1991 11124 11288 11113 1992 12297 12577 12179 1993 13896 14249 13226 1994 14286 14585 13600 1995 14734 15313 14202 1996 16241 16963 15310 1997 16918 17796 16142 1998 18503 19930 17352 1999 19480 21221 18424 2000 20023 21617 19028 FUND PERFORMANCE For the six months ended March 31, 2000, the fund returned 2.16%, which consisted of 2.80% in income distributions and -0.64% in capital change. During the same time frame, the fund's unmanaged benchmark, the Salomon Brothers Inc. Treasury/Government Sponsored Corporate Index (1-3 Years), returned 1.67%. Reflecting the higher interest rate environment, the fund's 30-day SEC yield rose from 5.78% six months ago to 5.91% as of the end of the period. THE FUND'S INVESTMENT STRATEGY The fund remains well-diversified among corporate bonds, mortgage-backed securities (also known as agency pass-throughs), and asset-backed securities. The shifts we make in the portfolio are designed to take advantage of values that exist among these different sectors. In the last six months, we have reduced the fund's position in corporates and raised its weighting in both mortgage and asset-backed securities, which we believe offer better relative value. Specifically, we have taken positions in securities -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + The unmanaged Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index is a market-value-weighted measure of Treasury issues, agency issues, corporate bond issues, and mortgage securities. ++ Salomon Brothers Inc. Treasury/Government Sponsored Corporate Index (1-3 years) is composed of Treasury, Government Sponsored Agency, and Corporate securities with maturities of one to three years. Index returns are calculated monthly and assume reinvestment of dividends. Unlike fund returns, index returns do not reflect any fees or expenses. All performance is historical and assumes reinvestment of all dividends and capital gains and is not indicative of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than when purchased. 20
N-30D23rd Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 23rd
that offer greater yields than corporates with the same quality rating. We intend to maintain our positions in these areas as long as we are able to pick up more yield without having to take on a greater level of risk. In terms of duration (which measures interest rate sensitivity), we have maintained a range of 1.6 to 1.9 years, which is slightly shorter than the fund's benchmark. We felt that this conservative positioning was warranted given that the economy is showing no signs of slowing down. The fund's average credit quality stands at AA, which helped performance in a period when higher quality securities tended to perform well. OUTLOOK We continue to believe that the bond market will have difficulty mounting a strong, sustainable rally until it becomes clear that growth has slowed enough to allow the Federal Reserve to take a less aggressive stance with regard to raising interest rates. In the meantime, we will continue to take advantage of volatility to build positions in bonds that have fallen to attractive valuation levels. While slumps in the bond market are always uncomfortable for investors, we view them as an opportunity to buy securities that we feel are mispriced by the market. From a long-term standpoint, we continue to believe that investing in high-quality, short-term bonds will continue to be an effective way for conservative investors to gain a monthly income with a relatively high level of principal stability. PORTFOLIO DIVERSIFICATION As of March 31, 2000 Corporate Bonds 37% U.S. Government-Backed Mortgages 23% Asset-Backed Securities 21% Cash Equivalents 9% Government National Mortgage Association 5% U.S. Treasury Obligations 3% U.S. Government Agency Pass-Throughs 2% ---- 100% ==== -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: FOR WHOM THE FUND IS DESIGNED The fund is designed for investors who: o Want a source of regular monthly income o Desire an income component for diversification o Can invest for at least three years o Can handle some ups and downs in investment performance ------------------------------ MATURITY STRUCTURE As of March 31, 2000 Under 2 Years ...........47.2% 2 to 3 Years ............25.9% 3 to 4 Years ............ 6.0% 4 to 5 Years ............ 9.1% 5 to 8 Years ............ 4.6% Over 8 Years ............ 7.2% ---- 100% ==== ------------------------------ PORTFOLIO STATISTICS Number of Issues ...........70 30-Day SEC Yield ........5.91% Average Coupon ..........6.50% Average Maturity ....3.0 Years Average Duration ....1.7 Years Average Quality ............AA ------------------------------ 21
N-30D24th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 24th
AARP GNMA AND U.S. TREASURY FUND -------------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: GOAL The fund seeks to produce a high level of income while actively seeking to reduce downside risk as compared with other GNMA mutual funds. The fund pursues its goal by investing primarily in high quality GNMA and U.S. Treasury securities. While GNMAs and Treasuries are guaranteed as to timely payment of principal and interest, the guarantee does not apply to the fund's yield or share price, both of which will fluctuate daily. PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT TEAM Richard L. Vandenberg Lead Portfolio Manager Scott E. Dolan John E. Dugenske Portfolio Managers ------------------------- TOTAL RETURN As of March 31, 2000 CUMULATIVE FUND INDEX+ ------------------------ 1 yr. 2.04% 2.89% 5 yr. 34.54% 42.79% 10 yr. 93.61% 117.54% AVERAGE ANNUAL FUND INDEX+ ------------------------ 1 yr. 2.04% 2.89% 5 yr. 6.11% 7.38% 10 yr. 6.83% 8.08% ------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A strong economy and the Federal Reserve's bias toward raising short-term interest rates over the six months contributed to an overall rising interest rate environment for mortgage-backed securities. Despite this adverse environment for fixed income securities, GNMAs performed better than other mortgage-backed securities and intermediate-term Treasuries. In this environment, investors preferred government backing and high quality over lower quality fixed income securities. THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A LINE CHART HERE LINE CHART TITLE: GROWTH OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT CHART PERIOD: Yearly Periods ended March 31, 2000 CHART DATA: AARP GNMA AND LEHMAN BROTHERS U.S. TREASURY FUND GNMA INDEX+ -------------------------------------------------- 1990 $10000 $10000 1991 11227 11393 1992 12412 12734 1993 13743 14178 1994 13794 14337 1995 14390 15235 1996 15631 16888 1997 16406 17901 1998 17951 19897 1999 18975 21144 2000 19361 21754 FUND PERFORMANCE The fund's 2.00% six-month return compares to the 2.39% return of its benchmark, the Lehman Brothers GNMA Index, for the same period. The fund's total return consisted of 3.23% in income distributions and -1.23% in capital change. Reflecting the higher interest rate environment, the fund's 30-day standardized SEC yield rose from 6.10% six months ago to 6.28% as of the end of the period. THE FUND'S INVESTMENT STRATEGY In pursuing the fund's objectives we employ a "top-down" approach that focuses on four key factors: the portfolio's sensitivity to changes in interest rates (duration), the allocation between GNMA and Treasury THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A MATRIX CHART HERE, SHOWING A THREE-YEAR RISK/RETURN PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND LINE CHART TITLE: AARP GNMA and U.S. Treasury Fund Three-Year Risk/Return Performance CHART DATA: (AARP Fund noted by XXXX) [Download Table] ----------------------------------- Lipper GNMA Return Peer Group Risk ----------------------------------- Highest Lowest Over the three years, this Return Best 25% XXXX Risk fund is in the bottom 25% of ------------ ----------- similar funds for total return and among the best 25% of Next 25% similar funds for monthly ------------ ----------- downside risk. Next 25% The monthly averages for risk ------------ ----------- and return are for 19 similar Lowest Highest funds for the period April 1, Return XXXX Worst 25% Risk 1997 through March 31, 2000. ------------ ----------- Lipper Analytical Services, Inc. is the source for the peer group information of similar funds. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + The unmanaged Lehman Brothers GNMA Index is a market-value-weighted measure of all fixed-rate securities backed by mortgage pools of the Government National Mortgage Association. Index returns are calculated monthly and assume reinvestment of dividends. Unlike fund returns, index returns do not reflect any fees or expenses. All performance is historical and assumes reinvestment of all dividends and capital gains and is not indicative of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than when purchased. 22
N-30D25th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 25th
securities, the vintage and "seasoning" of issues, and the fund's positioning with respect to the yield curve. In the fourth quarter the overall fixed income market was awash with liquidity as the Federal Reserve pumped money into the economy by dramatically expanding reserves in advance of Y2K concerns. As the new year came and went without any major crisis, the economy continued to display some of the strongest numbers in years, including buoyant consumer confidence, strong housing starts, and a healthy rate of new mortgage applications. Meanwhile, interest rates have continued to climb as rising commodity prices and record low unemployment accelerated inflation fears. Over the six months, we attempted to maintain a lower sensitivity to changes in interest rates by keeping the fund's duration shorter than our peers. We began the period with a duration of 4.2 years and closed the period at 4.0 years. By comparison, the Lehman Brothers GNMA Index's duration was 4.1 years on March 31, 2000. During the last six months of the period we reduced the fund's holdings of GNMAs to 76% of assets (down from 88% six months ago) in an effort to take advantage of the rally in Treasuries. In the portfolio, we increased our exposure to seasoned GNMA issues with 6.5% and 7% coupons. We believe that these bonds are attractively priced given their predictable prepayment characteristics. Positions in seasoned GNMAs with 8% coupons were sold in favor of new GNMAs with 8% and 7.5% coupons. Additionally, new GNMAs with 8.5% coupons were added given their attractive valuation. OUTLOOK Looking forward, we remain concerned that interest rates may continue to move higher (and prices may decline) unless economic activity slows. GNMAs continue to look attractive as prepayment risk remains low and supply remains minimal. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: FOR WHOM THE FUND IS DESIGNED The fund is designed for investors who: o Want a source of regular monthly income o Desire an income component for diversification o Can invest for at least three years o Can handle some ups and downs in investment performance ------------------------------ PORTFOLIO DIVERSIFICATION As of March 31, 2000 Government National Mortgage Association 76% Cash Equivalents 18% U.S. Treasury Obligations 6% ---- 100% ==== ------------------------------ PORTFOLIO STATISTICS Number of Issues ........2,222 30-Day Yield ............6.28% Average Coupon ..........8.79% Average Maturity...11.50 Years Average Duration ...4.04 Years Average Quality ...........AAA ------------------------------ 23
N-30D26th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 26th
AARP INSURED TAX FREE GENERAL BOND FUND SIDEBAR TEXT: GOAL The fund seeks to produce a high level of income that is free from federal income taxes^1 while actively seeking to reduce downside risk as compared with other insured tax-free bond mutual funds. The fund pursues its goal by investing at least 80% of its assets in high quality, tax-exempt municipal securities, most of which carry insurance that would pay the principal and interest in the event of default. This insurance does not apply to the fund's yield or share price, both of which will fluctuate daily. PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT TEAM Philip G. Condon Ashton P. Goodfield Co-Lead Portfolio Managers ------------------------ TOTAL RETURN As of March 31, 2000 CUMULATIVE FUND INDEX+ ------------------------ 1 yr. -.41% -.10% 5 yr. 29.32% 34.27% 10 yr. 90.51% 99.54% AVERAGE ANNUAL FUND INDEX+ ------------------------ 1 yr. -.41% -.10% 5 yr. 5.28% 6.06% 10 yr. 6.66% 7.15% ------------------------ ^1 It is the policy of the fund not to invest in taxable issues. However, the fund's income may be subject to state and local taxes. Gains on sales of fund shares and distributions of capital gains generally will be subject to federal, state, and local taxes. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FUND PERFORMANCE During the six-month period, yields of intermediate- and long-term municipal bonds rose, and their prices generally declined. In this challenging environment, AARP Insured Tax Free General Bond Fund managed to post a positive total return of 1.82% for the semiannual period ended March 31, 2000. The fund's 30-day SEC yield as of March 31 was 4.58%, equivalent to a 7.58% taxable yield for investors in the 39.6% tax bracket. THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A LINE CHART HERE LINE CHART TITLE: Growth of a $10,000 Investment CHART PERIOD: Yearly Periods ended March 31 CHART DATA: AARP INSURED TAX FREE LEHMAN BROTHERS GENERAL BOND FUND MUNICIPAL BOND INDEX+ --------------------------------------------------------- 1990 $10000 $10000 1991 10885 10922 1992 11896 12015 1993 13561 13520 1994 13805 13833 1995 14732 14861 1996 15797 16107 1997 16551 16985 1998 18194 18808 1999 19130 19974 2000 19051 19954 The fund outperformed the 1.73% average total return of its peers during the period, and ranked in the top 9% among 48 insured municipal debt funds for the one-year period ended March 31 according to Lipper Analytical Services, Inc. Longer term, the fund continues to display strong competitive performance: It ranked in the top 18% of 40 funds for the five-year period, and in the top 22% of 18 funds for the ten-year period. In light of its conservative strategy aimed at limiting losses during market declines, the fund may at times lag its benchmark, the unmanaged Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index. THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A MATRIX CHART HERE, SHOWING A THREE-YEAR RISK/RETURN PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND LINE CHART TITLE: AARP Insured Tax Free General Bond Fund Three-Year Risk/Return Performance CHART DATA: (AARP Fund noted by XXXX) [Download Table] ----------------------------------- Lipper Return Insured Muni Risk Debt Peer Group ----------------------------------- Highest Lowest Over the three years, this Return XXXX Best 25% XXXX Risk fund is among the best 25% of ------------ ----------- similar funds for total return and among the best 25% of Next 25% similar funds for monthly ------------ ----------- downside risk. Next 25% The monthly averages for risk ------------ ----------- and return are for 16 similar Lowest Highest funds for the period April 1, Return Worst 25% Risk 1997 through March 31, 2000. ------------ ----------- Lipper Analytical Services, Inc. is the source for the peer group information of similar funds. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + The unmanaged Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index is a market-value-weighted measure of municipal bonds with a maturity of at least two years. Index returns are calculated monthly and assume reinvestment of dividends. Unlike fund returns, index returns do not reflect any fees or expenses. All performance is historical and assumes reinvestment of all dividends and capital gains and is not indicative of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than when purchased. 24
N-30D27th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 27th
THE FUND'S INVESTMENT STRATEGY During the fund's most recent semiannual period, the Federal Reserve continued to raise interest rates to head off inflationary pressures as commodity prices rebounded, the nation's unemployment index reached 30-year lows, and consumer spending proceeded at a brisk pace. The Fed's action in March raised its short-term interest rate target to 6%. As a consequence, yields on 10-year Treasury bonds rose by 0.18 percentage point and their prices declined 1.24% over the six-month period. While municipal bond yields rose by 0.13 percentage point during this period, their prices declined only 0.86%. In light of these market conditions, our strategy has been to maintain a slightly shorter portfolio duration compared with other insured municipal bond funds. Over the period, the fund's duration rose from 6.7 years to 7.0 years. Within the fund's portfolio we maintained exposure to a broad range of geographically diversified high quality insured municipal securities. We continued to focus on intermediate-maturity AAA-rated municipal bonds (7-13 year maturities), but also increased our allocations toward the end of the period in 20-25 year bonds selling at a discount. We believe this strategy may help the fund capture additional income and total return potential over the coming months. During the six-month period, we maintained a two-part strategy: First, (in addition to our purchases of long-term discount bonds) we focused on premium "cushion" bonds -- high coupon bonds trading at a premium to face value. The premium dollar price provided protection from the market discount tax and provided reduced price volatility. At the same time, we continued the fund's strong emphasis on call protection. (Generally a bond is "called" or redeemed by its issuer so that it can be refinanced at a lower prevailing interest rate.) Our call-protection strategy provides a more reliable income stream for the fund than would exist if the portfolio held a significant proportion of bonds that could be called before their stated maturities. OUTLOOK In terms of the fund's day-to-day strategy, we will continue to seek competitive returns by purchasing bonds with the most attractive combination of maturity, coupon, and call protection. Rather than attempting to make investment decisions based on short-term market movements, we will search for attractively valued bonds. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOR WHOM THE FUND IS DESIGNED The fund is designed for investors who: o Want a source of regular monthly income o Desire tax-free income^1 o Can invest for at least three years o Can handle some ups and downs in investment performance ---------------------------- MUNICIPAL BOND EFFECTIVE MATURITIES ALLOCATION As of March 31, 2000 Less than 1 year .......... 3% 1 to less than 5 years ....13% 5 to less than 10 years ...43% 10 to less than 15 years ..28% Greater than 15 years .....13% ---- 100% ==== ------------------------------ PORTFOLIO STATISTICS Number of Issues ...........330 30-Day SEC Yield .........4.58% Average Coupon ...........4.43% Average Maturity .....9.6 Years Effective Duration ..6.97 Years Average Quality ........... AAA ------------------------------- 25
N-30D28th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 28th
AARP BOND FUND FOR INCOME ------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: GOAL The fund seeks to produce a high level of current income while actively seeking to reduce downside risk as compared with other long-term bond mutual funds. The fund pursues its goal by investing at least 65% of its assets in high quality bonds of any maturity with credit ratings of investment grade. The fund may also invest up to 35% in high yield, low quality bonds. PORTFOLIO MANAGER Robert S. Cessine Lead Portfolio Manager ------------------------- TOTAL RETURN As of March 31, 2000 CUMULATIVE FUND INDEX+ ------------------------- 1 yr. .34% 1.87% Life of Fund* 16.23% 20.42% AVERAGE ANNUAL FUND INDEX+ ------------------------- 1 yr. .34% 1.87% Life of Fund* 4.87% 6.05% ------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- During the six-month period, the bond market suffered as continued strength in the U.S. economy prompted the Federal Reserve to raise short-term interest rates on five separate occasions. Government issues were the best performing segment of the bond market, due largely to the Treasury's announcement that it would be reducing the supply of government debt by curtailing new issuance and buying back existing bonds. Since the Treasury is focusing its efforts on reducing the supply of longer-term bonds, that sector of the market performed extremely well even as shorter-term bonds were pressured by rising rates. As a result, longer-term Treasuries actually offered lower yields than their short-term counterparts for the final two months of the period. This anomaly, which is particularly unusual during a time of prosperity, roiled other sectors of the bond market and caused longer-term corporates and mortgage-backed securities to slump even as Treasuries rallied. THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A LINE CHART HERE LINE CHART TITLE: Growth of a $10,000 Investment CHART PERIOD: Semiannual Periods from February 1, 1997* to March 31, 2000 CHART DATA: AARP BOND FUND LEHMAN BROTHERS FOR INCOME AGGREGATE BOND INDEX+ ---------------------------------------------------------- 2/1/97* $10000 $10000 3/97 9882 9914 9/97 10565 10621 3/98 10992 11102 9/98 11460 11842 3/99 11584 11821 9/99 11408 11796 3/00 11578 12042 FUND PERFORMANCE This environment was a distinct negative for the fund, which holds a large position in corporate bonds and a relatively small weighting in Treasuries. For the six months ended March 31, 2000, the fund returned 1.49% compared to a return of 2.08% for its unmanaged benchmark, the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index. The fund's return consisted of 3.54% in income distributions and -2.05 % in capital change, and its SEC yield was 7.45% as of the close of the period versus 7.22% on September 30, 1999.^1 THE FUND'S INVESTMENT STRATEGY Although the fund is widely diversified among a variety of sectors within the bond market, the aspect of our strategy that had the greatest impact on fund performance was our focus on corporate bonds, particularly those in the below investment grade (or high yield) sector. During the latter -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + The unmanaged Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index is a market-value-weighted measure of Treasury issues, agency issues, corporate bond issues, and mortgage securities. Index returns are calculated monthly and assume reinvestment of dividends. Unlike fund returns, index returns do not reflect any fees or expenses. All performance is historical and assumes reinvestment of all dividends and capital gains and is not indicative of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than when purchased. ^1 Fund expenses are being maintained until 1/31/01. Without such maintenance, the total return would have been lower and the yield on the AARP Bond Fund for Income would have been 7.25%. * The fund commenced operations on February 1, 1997. 26
N-30D29th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 29th
part of 1999, we increased the fund's position in high yield bonds based on what we believed were their attractive valuations. However, the sector has been hurt by the volatility in Treasuries, and our high yield position has detracted from fund performance. Our holdings in high grade corporates also produced weak performance, although these securities generally outperformed high yield issues. Looking ahead, we believe that the worst is now behind us with respect to the performance of corporates. We intend to maintain a substantial position in the sector, which we believe is an essential component of a fund that is focused on producing a high monthly income. In addition, the sector has fallen to levels that, in our view, are very compelling. We kept the fund's duration, or interest rate sensitivity, in a range of 4.9 to 5.2 years, which is roughly in line with the benchmark. We intend to maintain this neutral approach until the interest rate outlook stabilizes. The average credit rating of the portfolio's holdings is A. OUTLOOK We believe that the bond market will remain unsettled until it becomes clear that the Fed is approaching the end of its series of rate hikes. In the interim, we intend to position the portfolio to withstand the effects of further bond market volatility. We have increased the level of liquidity and diversification in the portfolio, and are confident that our mix of corporate bonds, government issues, and mortgage-backed securities will enable the fund to offer high monthly income and strong risk-adjusted returns over the long term. PORTFOLIO ALLOCATION As of March 31, 2000 Corporate Bonds 55% U.S. Treasury Obligations 21% U.S. Government-Backed Mortgages 9% Government National Mortgage Association 3% Asset-Backed Securities 3% Foreign Bonds -- U.S. $ Denominated 2% Cash Equivalents 5% Collateralized Mortgage Obligations 2% ---- 100% ==== -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: FOR WHOM THE FUND IS DESIGNED The fund is designed for investors who: o Want a source of regular monthly income o Desire an income component for diversification o Can invest for at least three years o Can handle some ups and downs in investment performance ------------------------------ MATURITY STRUCTURE As of March 31, 2000 Under One Year ............ 5% 1 to 5 Years ..............25% 5 to 8 Years ..............30% Over 8 Years ..............40% ---- 100% ==== ------------------------------ PORTFOLIO STATISTICS Number of Issues ..........85 30-Day SEC Yield .......7.45% Average Coupon .........7.28% Average Maturity ...8.9 Years Average Duration ...5.1 Years Average Quality ............A ------------------------------ 27
N-30D30th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 30th
AARP BALANCED STOCK AND BOND FUND --------------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: GOAL The fund seeks to provide long-term capital growth and income while actively seeking to reduce downside risk as compared with other balanced mutual funds. The fund pursues its goal by investing primarily in a diversified mix of stocks with above-average dividend yields, high quality bonds, and cash reserves. PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT TEAM Kathleen T. Millard Lead Portfolio Manager Robert S. Cessine Gregory S. Adams Portfolio Managers ------------------------- TOTAL RETURN As of March 31, 2000 CUMULATIVE FUND INDEX+ --------------------------- 1 yr. 4.25% 10.29% 5 yr. 81.82% 116.04% Life of Fund* 87.90% 126.01% AVERAGE ANNUAL FUND INDEX+ --------------------------- 1 yr. 4.25% 10.29% 5 yr. 12.70% 16.64% Life of Fund* 10.77% 14.14% --------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- During the first five months of the period, the U.S. stock market was led by a small group of technology stocks. However, the stocks of companies in other industries began to move upward again in March. Rising interest rates, strong economic growth, and relatively high prices for some stocks drove this change in the market. THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A LINE CHART HERE LINE CHART TITLE: Growth of a $10,000 Investment CHART PERIOD: Annual Periods from February 1, 1994* to March 31, 2000 CHART DATA: AARP BALANCED LEHMAN BROTHERS STOCK AND BOND STANDARD & POOR'S AGGREGATE BOND BLENDED FUND 500 INDEX INDEX INDEX+ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2/94* $10000 $10000 $10000 $10000 3/94 9642 9305 9583 9490 3/95 10467 10752 10062 10461 3/96 12669 14203 11146 12602 3/97 14250 17019 11694 14157 3/98 18575 25191 13095 18168 3/99 18256 29841 13944 20493 3/00 19031 35199 14204 22601 FUND PERFORMANCE The dominance of growth stocks and the rising interest rate environment have been a distinct disadvantage to the fund's diversified approach to investing in value-oriented equities and fixed income securities. However, we continued to narrow the performance gap between the fund and its benchmark -- a blended index of the S&P 500, Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond, and Merrill Lynch 3-Month Treasury Bill indices. Reflecting this environment, the fund trailed the blended index with a return of 5.06% versus 9.83% for the index over the six months. THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A MATRIX CHART HERE, SHOWING A THREE-YEAR RISK/RETURN PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND LINE CHART TITLE: AARP Balanced Stock and Bond Fund Three-Year Risk/Return Performance CHART DATA: (AARP Fund noted by XXXX) [Download Table] ----------------------------------- Lipper Return Balanced Risk Peer Group ----------------------------------- Highest Lowest Over the three years, this Return Best 25% Risk fund is in the bottom 25% of ------------ ----------- similar funds for total return and among the best 50% of Next 25% XXXX similar funds for monthly ------------ ----------- downside risk. Next 25% The monthly averages for risk ------------ ----------- and return are for 171 similar Lowest Highest funds for the period April 1, Return XXXX Worst 25% Risk 1997 through March 31, 2000. ------------ ----------- Lipper Analytical Services, Inc. is the source for the peer group information of similar funds. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + The performance of the blended benchmark is a weighting comprised of 50% Standard & Poor's 500 Index (S&P), 40% Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index (LBAB), and 10% the Merrill Lynch 3-Month Treasury Bill Index. The 50/40/10 measure is meant to reflect the anticipated long-range asset mix of the fund, which may change over time. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks. The index is designed to measure performance of domestic stocks through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. The unmanaged Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index is a market-value-weighted measure of Treasury issues, agency issues, corporate bond issues, and mortgage securities. Index returns are calculated monthly and assume reinvestment of dividends. Unlike fund returns, index returns do not reflect any fees or expenses. All performance is historical and assumes reinvestment of all dividends and capital gains and is not indicative of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than when purchased. * The fund commenced operations on February 1, 1994. 28
N-30D31st Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 31st
THE FUND'S INVESTMENT STRATEGY The equity portion of the portfolio follows the same investment approach as AARP Growth and Income Fund (see pages 30-33). In this part of the portfolio, we continued to focus on three important criteria: valuation, fundamentals, and risk management. The fund's recently broadened investment universe allowed us to significantly increase technology stocks to 12.5% of total assets from 2.0% last fall. In this area, our holdings of Oracle, Corning, and Intel made important contributions to performance. In the financial sector, we have a favorable outlook for multinational financial conglomerates like American International Group and Citigroup, which should prosper despite rising interest rates. We believe that global economic growth should benefit low cost commodity producers like the major oil companies and chemical producer Dow Chemical. Stocks in the consumer and health care areas are very compelling values, in our opinion, because many have been beaten down by concerns about slowing economic growth. The fund has exposure in these areas through its holdings in PepsiCo and Merck. In the fixed income portion of the portfolio, we kept the fund's overall duration roughly in line with that of the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index. The fund's average duration ranged from 4.9 to 5.2 years, reflecting our neutral approach. Although the fund's fixed income holdings are diversified among a variety of sectors, our focus on corporate bonds held back performance. Looking ahead, we intend to maintain a substantial position in corporates, believing that the worst is now behind us and that corporates remain an essential component of the fund's balanced approach. OUTLOOK We strongly believe that our philosophy, enhanced investment disciplines, and current holdings in the equity portion of the portfolio will position the fund well in striving to achieve its long-term investment goals. While the daily gyrations of the markets will likely continue for the near term, the overall U.S. economy remains healthy. In this environment, we believe that the fund's diversified approach can provide investors with exposure to the stock market's opportunities with less risk than comparable investments. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: FOR WHOM THE FUND IS DESIGNED The fund is designed for investors who: o Want long-term growth with less risk than a purely growth-oriented investment o Can invest for at least three to five years o Can handle some ups and downs in investment performance o Are building a diversified portfolio with a few core investments ---------------------------- ASSET ALLOCATION As of March 31, 2000 Stock Holdings 65% Bond Holdings 33% Cash Equivalents 2% ---- 100% ==== ---------------------------- STOCK ALLOCATION As of March 31, 2000 Technology 19% Financial 18% Manufacturing 12% Communications 11% Energy 10% Health 9% Consumer Staples 5% Service Industries 5% Media 4% Other 7% ---- 100% ==== ---------------------------- 29
N-30D32nd Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 32nd
AARP GROWTH AND INCOME FUND --------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: GOAL The fund seeks to provide long-term capital growth and income while actively seeking to reduce downside risk as compared with other growth and income mutual funds. The fund pursues its goal by investing primarily in common stocks and securities convertible into common stocks. PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT TEAM Kathleen T. Millard Lead Portfolio Manager Gregory S. Adams Portfolio Manager ------------------------- TOTAL RETURN As of March 30, 2000 CUMULATIVE FUND INDEX+ ------------------------- 1 yr. 8.48% 17.96% 5 yr. 128.67% 227.36% 10 yr. 314.30% 462.08% AVERAGE ANNUAL FUND INDEX+ ------------------------- 1 yr. 8.48% 17.96% 5 yr. 17.99% 26.73% 10 yr. 15.27% 18.83% ------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Over the six-month period AARP Growth and Income Fund was affected by three factors: overall market conditions, our long-term investment strategy, and the stocks currently held in the portfolio. The U.S. stock market, as defined by the unmanaged S&P 500 Index, was led by a small group of technology stocks for most of the period. However, the stocks of companies in other industries began to move upward again in March. Rising interest rates, strong economic growth, and relatively high prices for some stocks drove this change in the market. THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A LINE CHART HERE LINE CHART TITLE: Growth of a $10,000 Investment CHART PERIOD: Yearly Periods ended March 31 CHART DATA: AARP GROWTH AND STANDARD & POOR'S INCOME FUND 500 INDEX+ ------------------------------------------------------- 1990 $10000 $10000 1991 11435 11441 1992 13120 12706 1993 15176 14644 1994 16006 14858 1995 18118 17710 1996 23900 22681 1997 28159 27176 1998 40928 40226 1999 38192 47652 2000 41430 56208 FUND PERFORMANCE The fund significantly narrowed the performance gap versus the S&P 500 Index during the six-month period (see table on page 3). We believe the fund's improving performance reflects the recent enhancements to our stock selection disciplines, which include a broadening of the fund's investment universe. This helped the fund perform well versus the S&P 500 Index during market declines in January and March. However, the strategy also caused the fund to lag the index during the rally in February. As a result, the fund's 8.20% six-month return reflects its weaker performance during the first half THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A MATRIX CHART HERE, SHOWING A THREE-YEAR RISK/RETURN PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND LINE CHART TITLE: AARP Growth and Income Fund Three-Year Risk/Return Performance CHART DATA: (AARP Fund noted by XXXX) [Download Table] ----------------------------------- Large Blend Return and Value Risk Peer Group ----------------------------------- Highest Lowest Over the three years, this Return Best 25% XXXX Risk fund is in the bottom 25% of ------------ ----------- similar funds for total return and among the best 25% of Next 25% similar funds for monthly ------------ ----------- downside risk. Next 25% The monthy averages for risk ------------ ----------- and return are for 200 similar Lowest Highest funds for the period April 1, Return XXXX Worst 25% Risk 1997 through March 31, 2000. ------------ ----------- Morningstar is the source for the peer group information of similar funds. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks. The index is designed to measure performance of domestic stocks through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. Index returns are calculated monthly and assume reinvestment of dividends. Unlike fund returns, index returns do not reflect any fees or expenses. All performance is historical and assumes reinvestment of all dividends and capital gains and is not indicative of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than when purchased. 30
N-30D33rd Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 33rd
THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A TABLE HERE: IMPROVING TREND AN ENHANCED INVESTMENT STRATEGY HELPED NARROW THE GAP BETWEEN THE FUND AND ITS BENCHMARK IN THE FIRST CALENDAR QUARTER OF 2000. TOTAL RETURNS FUND S&P 500 INDEX DIFFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fourth quarter 1999 6.60% 14.88% -8.28% First quarter 2000 1.50% 2.30% -0.80% --------------------------------------------------------------------------- of the period. The S&P 500 Index returned 17.52% for the same six-month period. Over the long term (a 3-5 year market cycle), we seek to outperform the market averages with less risk than similar growth and income funds while maintaining a disciplined, value-oriented investment philosophy. We began to implement our enhanced investment disciplines in the second half of 1999, which we believe is one of the key reasons why the fund has begun to narrow the performance gap versus the S&P 500 during the first calendar quarter of 2000. We believe this is an indication that we are making progress toward our longer-term investment goals. Given that the market environment did not favor value investing during most of the six-month period, we are pleased with the fund's progress. However, we believe that longer-term time frames will be a more accurate measure of our strategy's success. Over the short-term, we expect the fund to outperform the S&P 500 when value-oriented investments are in favor and lag when growth-oriented investments are in favor. Shareholders should be mindful that the difference between the returns of growth and value stocks can be very wide at times. THE FUND'S INVESTMENT STRATEGY The fund's current portfolio holdings reflect our long-term investment strategy of building a diversified portfolio with a value orientation. Within this framework our stock selection is based on three important criteria: valuation, fundamentals, and risk management. First, we analyze stock valuations. We seek to identify the most attractive stocks given their potential upside and their possible risks versus other investments. Because there are several ways of determining a stock's valuation, we use a number of traditional yardsticks, including yield, price, and earnings ratios to determine a stock's intrinsic worth. Second, we assess the company's prospects. Does the company have a viable earnings growth path? Does management possess credible tools that can be used to achieve this growth? Our research analysts help us find (Continued on next page) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: FOR WHOM THE FUND IS DESIGNED The fund is designed for investors who: o Want long-term growth with less risk than a purely growth-oriented investment o Can invest for at least five years o Can handle some ups and downs in investment performance o Are building a diversified portfolio with a few core investments 31
N-30D34th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 34th
AARP GROWTH AND INCOME FUND (CONTINUED) answers to these questions. Finally, we manage risk by analyzing how each individual stock we buy or sell interacts with the other stocks in the portfolio. We consider how these transactions affect the fund's diversification and its exposure to certain industries. We also look at the fund's exposure to economic events, such as changes in interest rates or economic growth indicators. THREE FACTORS There were three factors contributing to the fund's performance over the six months: strong performance by top fund holdings, an increased technology weighting, and good stock selection. Among the fund's top performing holdings were Intel, Corning, Oracle, and American Home Products. These stocks, along with several other large portfolio holdings, reflect our investment disciplines and have had a positive impact on the portfolio. During October and November 1999 we took advantage of market weakness to add key technology stocks that met our investment criteria. The fund's increased weighting in technology had an important and positive impact on returns, especially considering that technology was the only sector that surpassed the S&P 500. Investors should be aware that the index now contains a significant weighting in technology stocks, with the sector comprising about 30% of the S&P 500 benchmark. In this sector, there are some very speculative stocks, some of which at March 31 valuations were not appropriate for the fund's portfolio. We intend to maintain our emphasis on high quality technology companies, which will likely cause the fund to remain underweighted in this sector. However, a significant decline in technology stock prices might bring a number of stocks into our "buy" range. In that case, we would carefully weigh each individual stock's potential against the risks. Some of our technology holdings include Corning, a major supplier of fiberoptic cable -- a key building block for the growth of the Internet, and Intel -- the computer chip maker.^1 The fund also benefited from good stock selection over the six months. A good example of our investment disciplines at work is Disney, which outperformed the market. The stock was temporarily depressed by poor earnings in 1999, making it a very attractive value at the time of purchase. Our assessment of the company's earnings and cash flow outlook suggested that management's plans to improve returns on invested capital would begin to show results in 2000. The stock also provided good diversification for the fund because, at the time it was added to the portfolio, we had no investments in the media area. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: ----------------------------- SECTOR DIVERSIFICATION -- EXCLUDES CASH EQUIVALENTS As of March 31, 2000 Technology 19% Financial 18% Manufacturing 11% Communications 11% Energy 10% Health 9% Consumer Staples 5% Service Industries 5% Media 4% Other 8% ---- 100% ==== ----------------------------- ASSET ALLOCATION As of March 31, 2000 Stock Holdings 98% Cash Equivalents 2% ---- 100% ==== ----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ^1 Management considers Corning a technology company, although its standard industry classification remains under the Manufacturing category in the Investment Portfolios section on page 86. 32
N-30D35th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 35th
The fund is diversified across many sectors and industries, with holdings in companies that have reasonable stock valuations and strong earnings outlooks. In the financial sector, we have a favorable outlook for multinational financial conglomerates such as American International Group and Citigroup, which should prosper despite rising interest rates. We believe that global economic growth should benefit low cost commodity producers such as the major oil companies and chemical producer Dow Chemical. Stocks in the consumer and health care areas are very compelling values, in our opinion, because many have been beaten down by concerns about slowing economic growth. The fund has exposure in these two areas through its holdings in PepsiCo and Merck. OUTLOOK We strongly believe that our philosophy, enhanced investment disciplines, and current holdings position the fund well in striving to achieve its long-term investment goals. While the daily gyrations of the markets will likely continue for the near term, the overall U.S. economy remains healthy. In this environment, we believe that the fund's approach can provide investors with exposure to the stock market's opportunities with less risk than comparable investments. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10 LARGEST EQUITY HOLDINGS (31% OF PORTFOLIO AS OF MARCH 31, 2000) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. Intel Corp. 6. General Electric Co. 2. Corning, Inc. 7. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. 3. Oracle Corp. 8. Microsoft Corp. 4. Exxon Mobil Corp. 9. Citigroup, Inc. 5. American Home Products Corp. 10. American International Group, Inc. 33
N-30D36th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 36th
AARP U.S. STOCK INDEX FUND -------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: GOAL The fund seeks to provide long-term capital growth while actively seeking to reduce downside risk as compared with other S&P 500 Index mutual funds. The fund pursues its goal by investing at least 95% of its assets in stocks of companies in the S&P 500 Index, as well as futures contracts and options based on the index. PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT TEAM Bankers Trust Company Subadviser James M. Eysenbach Scudder Liaison ------------------------- TOTAL RETURN As of March 31, 2000 CUMULATIVE FUND INDEX+ ------------------------- 1 yr. 18.74% 17.96% Life of Fund* 99.37% 99.87% AVERAGE ANNUAL FUND INDEX+ ------------------------- 1 yr. 18.74% 17.96% Life of Fund* 24.39% 24.46% ------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The strong performance of growth and technology stocks continued to drive the S&P 500 Index over most of the six-month period. However, market sentiment shifted in March, as investors retreated from many of these high-priced stocks to those of solid, blue chip companies. THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A LINE CHART HERE LINE CHART TITLE: Growth of a $10,000 Investment CHART PERIOD: Semiannual Periods from February 1, 1997* to March 31, 2000 CHART DATA: AARP U.S. STOCK STANDARD & POOR'S INDEX FUND 500 INDEX+ ------------------------------------------------- 2/1/97* $10000 $10000 3/97 9658 9664 9/97 12122 12202 3/98 14223 14304 9/98 13260 13306 3/99 16790 16945 9/99 16975 17008 3/00 19937 19987 FUND PERFORMANCE The fund performed well, despite an environment of significantly increased market volatility and a continued concentration of performance almost exclusively in a small group of high growth stocks. For the six-month period ended March 31, 2000, the fund returned 17.45%, essentially matching the 17.52% return of the unmanaged S&P 500 Index for the same period. In addition, the fund earned its first Morningstar Rating(TM) -- 4 stars -- among 3,571 domestic equity funds for its risk-adjusted performance as of March 31, 2000.^1 After solid performance for the S&P 500 in the fourth quarter of 1999, the first quarter of 2000 was disappointing for almost every industry sector except technology. However, tech stocks eased in March on fears of accelerating inflation and an apparent acknowledgement that the relatively high prices of some technology stocks were not sustainable. Overall, market volatility increased significantly, but the fund continued to benefit as performance broadened into other sectors in March. The dominance of growth and technology stocks over most of the six months continued to benefit the fund. While consumer cyclicals, capital goods, basic materials, and communications sectors performed strongly in the fourth quarter of 1999, all reported negative returns for the first quarter of this year. Financial stocks, which are the second largest weighting in the S&P 500 after technology, were buffeted by rising interest rates during the first five months of the period. However, the sector rose more than 18% in -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks. The index is designed to measure performance of domestic stocks through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. Index returns are calculated monthly and assume reinvestment of dividends. Unlike fund returns, index returns do not reflect any fees or expenses. All performance is historical and assumes reinvestment of all dividends and capital gains and is not indicative of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than when purchased. The adviser has agreed to maintain expenses until 1/31/01. If the adviser had not maintained expenses, total returns would have been lower. * The fund commenced operations on February 1, 1997. ^1 Morningstar proprietary ratings reflect historical risk-adjusted performance as of 3/31/00. Ratings are subject to change every month and are calculated from the fund's three-, five-, and ten-year average annual returns in excess of 90-day Treasury bill returns with appropriate fee adjustments, and a risk factor that reflects fund performance below 90-day T-bill returns. In its broad asset class, the top 10% of funds receive 5 stars and the next 22.5% receive 4 stars. In the domestic equity category, the fund received a 4-star rating for the three-year period among 3571 funds in its broad asset class. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. 34
N-30D37th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 37th
March, besting all other sectors of the S&P 500, including technology. This activity highlights the shifting nature of the industry sectors over the six-month period. THE FUND'S INVESTMENT STRATEGY The fund's benchmark -- the S&P 500 Index -- is widely regarded as the standard for measuring large-cap U.S. stock market performance. This popular index includes a representative sample of leading companies in leading industries and is used by the majority of U.S. money managers and pension plan sponsors to evaluate large-cap portfolios. The fund is designed to track the performance of the S&P 500 Index (typically within 1% per year), while offering slightly less downside risk. The fund seeks to reduce downside risk by adhering to a "yield tilt strategy." This strategy entails investing in a large majority of the S&P 500 stocks, but gives more weight to stocks paying higher dividends. Dividend-paying stocks historically have been more stable, especially in periods of market decline. The fund's other investment characteristics, such as sector weightings and average market capitalization, are kept roughly in line with the index. Similar to the S&P 500 Index, the fund gives greater weight to the largest companies. The fund benefited directly from its significant weighting in technology stocks, as this sector provided the best performance for the six months. OUTLOOK The fund's passive approach is well suited to periods when specific industry sectors are shifting in and out of favor. Because the fund basically seeks to reflect the industry weights and characteristics of the index, it does not run the risk of underperforming the index due to subjective weightings in specific stocks or industry sectors. While a rising interest rate environment generally works against stocks, the U.S. economy is healthy and many companies that comprise the S&P 500 Index are among the largest and most financially sound in the world. In the months ahead we expect the environment of increased market volatility to continue. Nevertheless, we believe the fund's approach will remain an attractive core portfolio component for long-term investors. 10 LARGEST EQUITY HOLDINGS (25% OF PORTFOLIO AS OF MARCH 31, 2000) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. Microsoft Corp. 6. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 2. Cisco Systems, Inc. 7. Exxon Mobil Corp. 3. General Electric Co. 8. Nortel Networks Corp. 4. Intel Corp. 9. International Business Machines Corp. 5. Oracle Corp. 10. Lucent Technologies, Inc. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: FOR WHOM THE FUND IS DESIGNED The fund is designed for investors who: o Want long-term growth with less risk than a purely growth-oriented investment o Can invest for at least five years o Can handle some ups and downs in investment performance o Are building a diversified portfolio with a few core investments -------------------------- SECTOR DIVERSIFICATION As of March 31, 2000 Technology 27% Financial 12% Manufacturing 9% Communications 9% Health 9% Consumer Discretionary 7% Energy 6% Consumer Staples 6% Durables 4% Other 11% ---- 100% ==== -------------------------- ASSET ALLOCATION As of March 31, 2000 Stock Holdings 100% ---- 100% ==== -------------------------- 35
N-30D38th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 38th
AARP CAPITAL GROWTH FUND ------------------------ SIDEBAR TEXT: GOAL The fund seeks to provide long-term capital growth while actively seeking to reduce downside risk as compared with other growth mutual funds. The fund pursues its goal by utilizing individual stock selection to invest primarily in the common stocks and securities convertible into common stocks of established medium- to large-sized companies. PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT TEAM Bruce F. Beaty William F. Gadsden Co-Lead Portfolio Managers ------------------------- TOTAL RETURN As of March 31, 2000 CUMULATIVE FUND INDEX+ ------------------------- 1 yr. 33.74% 17.96% 5 yr. 245.16% 227.36% 10 yr. 414.67% 462.08% AVERAGE ANNUAL FUND INDEX+ ------------------------- 1 yr. 33.74% 17.96% 5 yr. 28.12% 26.73% 10 yr. 17.80% 18.83% ------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- After falling in the first two months of the year, the S&P 500 surged to new highs in March on a strong rebound in depressed financial and cyclical stocks. A combination of strong economic growth, moderate core inflation, and an improving outlook for corporate profits helped alleviate investors' concerns earlier in the year about the impact of rising energy and labor prices. While the Federal Reserve Board raised short-term interest rates three times during the six months, stock investors were not deterred by the rising rate environment. THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A LINE CHART HERE LINE CHART TITLE: Growth of a $10,000 Investment CHART PERIOD: Yearly Periods ended March 31 CHART DATA: AARP CAPITAL STANDARD & POOR'S GROWTH FUND 500 INDEX+ ---------------------------------------------- 1990 10000 10000 1991 10888 11441 1992 12545 12706 1993 14077 14644 1994 14327 14858 1995 14911 17170 1996 19496 22681 1997 22642 27176 1998 33838 40226 1999 38483 47652 2000 51467 56208 FUND PERFORMANCE AARP Capital Growth Fund returned 28.25% for the period, beating the 17.52% return of its unmanaged benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The fund also performed well against its peers: according to Lipper Analytical Services, it finished in the top 6% of its peer group for the one-year period ended March 31, 2000.1 We believe that the fund's strong performance is a result of our disciplined stock selection methodology, as well as the fact that the market climate was favorable for the stocks in our investment universe. THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A MATRIX CHART HERE, SHOWING A THREE-YEAR RISK/RETURN PEFORMANCE OF THE FUND LINE CHART TITLE: AARP Capital Growth Fund Three-Year Risk/Return Performance CHART DATA: (AARP Fund noted by XXXX) [Download Table] ----------------------------------- Morningstar Over the three years, this Return Large Growth Risk fund is among the top 75% of Peer Group similar funds for total return ----------------------------------- and in the top 50% of similar Highest Lowest funds for monthly downside Return Best 25% Risk risk. ------------ ----------- The monthly averages for risk Next 25% XXXX and return are for 217 similar ------------ ----------- funds for the period April 1, 1997 through March 31, 2000. XXXX Next 25% ------------ ----------- Morningstar is the source for Lowest Highest the peer group information of Return Worst 25% Risk similar funds. ------------ ----------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks. The index is designed to measure performance of domestic stocks through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. Index returns are calculated monthly and assume reinvestment of dividends. Unlike fund returns, index returns do not reflect any fees or expenses. All performance is historical and assumes reinvestment of all dividends and capital gains and is not indicative of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than when purchased. ^1 Source: Lipper Analytical Services, Inc., an independent analyst of investment performance. The fund's returns placed it in the top 6% of 424 Large Cap Core Funds for the one-year period, in the top 9% of 213 funds for the three-year period, in the top 5% of 141 funds for the five-year period, and in the top 40% of 54 funds for the ten-year period. Performance includes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. 36
N-30D39th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 39th
THE FUND'S INVESTMENT STRATEGY In managing the fund, we use a method known as GARP, which stands for "Growth at a Reasonable Price." We use this technique to identify what we believe are relatively attractive growth companies, and to gauge when a stock has reached a price that appears to be excessive in light of its long-term growth prospects. We believe that good companies that offer superior long-term growth characteristics are worth more than less reliable companies that are often "cheap" for a reason. This disciplined methodology has allowed us to participate in some of the market's biggest winners, and avoid an inordinate amount of negative surprises. The fund's strategy within the technology sector continued to be a key driver of strong performance. While the fund has not aggressively overweighted this sector (in order to maintain balance and diversification), our holdings have added significant value. We continued to focus on high-quality, proven companies which are capitalizing on the enormous growth in demand for Internet and telecommunications capacity, as well as companies creating the tools to facilitate the explosive growth in business- to-business electronic commerce. Outside of technology, we continued to favor the media sector, where the strong economy continues to drive healthy growth in advertising revenues. We trimmed our pharmaceutical holdings further as growth rates are moderating, and several of our technology holdings where valuations had exceeded our targets. OUTLOOK Over the past few years, many investors have underestimated the resilience of the U.S. economy and the ability of the monetary authorities to keep the economy on an even keel. Instead, it has proven worthwhile to keep a long-term view and to avoid the temptation to sell when market conditions deteriorate. While we feel that caution is warranted as long as the threat of higher interest rates is an issue, we remain optimistic about the companies we hold in the portfolio, and believe that our disciplined investment style will continue to position the fund for outperformance over time. 10 LARGEST EQUITY HOLDINGS (31% OF PORTFOLIO AS OF MARCH 31, 2000) ------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. Intel Corp. 6. AT&T Corp.-Liberty Media Group 2. Microsoft Corp. 7. American International Group, Inc. 3. General Electric Co. 8. Home Depot, Inc. 4. Cisco Systems, Inc. 9. American Express Co. 5. Warner-Lambert Co. 10. EMC Corp. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: FOR WHOM THE FUND IS DESIGNED The fund is designed for investors who: o Want long-term growth of principal o Are not looking for a source of regular income o Can invest for at least five years o Can handle potentially large ups and downs in investment performance o Are looking for a fund to invest for the growth portion of their portfolio -------------------------- SECTOR DIVERSIFICATION -- EXCLUDES CASH EQUIVALENTS As of March 31, 2000 Technology 29% Health 12% Financial 9% Manufacturing 9% Consumer Discretionary 8% Communications 8% Media 7% Consumer Staples 6% Energy 6% Other 6% ---- 100% ==== -------------------------- ASSET ALLOCATION As of March 31, 2000 Stock Holdings 98% Cash Equivalents 2% ---- 100% ==== -------------------------- 37
N-30D40th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 40th
AARP SMALL COMPANY STOCK FUND ----------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: GOAL The fund seeks to provide long-term capital growth while actively seeking to reduce downside risk as compared with other small company stock funds. The fund pursues its goal by investing primarily in stocks of small U.S. companies with potential for above-average long-term capital growth. PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT TEAM James M. Eysenbach Lead Portfolio Manager Calvin S. Young Portfolio Manager ------------------------- TOTAL RETURN As of March 31, 2000 CUMULATIVE FUND INDEX+ ------------------------- 1 yr. 9.04% 37.28% Life of Fund* 19.83% 51.77% AVERAGE ANNUAL FUND INDEX+ ------------------------- 1 yr. 9.04% 37.28% Life of Fund* 5.89% 14.09% ------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The fund's emphasis on small-cap stocks with attractive valuations and solid earnings continued to be out of favor over the six months as stocks rose to record highs. On the surface small-cap stocks appeared to perform well, with a 26.82% total return as measured by the unmanaged Russell 2000 Index. This performance surpassed the return of large-cap stocks for the same six-month period. However, the period is best described as a tale of two divergent markets: A select group of the largest growth stocks in the Russell 2000 Index provided exceptional returns, while the median stock in the index was actually down 0.80%. THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A LINE CHART HERE LINE CHART TITLE: Growth of a $10,000 Investment CHART PERIOD: Semiannual Periods from February 1, 1997* to March 31, 2000 CHART DATA: AARP SMALL COMPANY RUSSELL 2000 STOCK FUND INDEX+ -------------------------------------------------------- 2/1/97* 10000 10000 3/97 9940 9297 9/97 13353 12413 3/98 14387 13202 9/98 11362 10050 3/99 10989 11055 9/99 12009 11967 3/00 11983 15177 FUND PERFORMANCE The fund's -0.22% six-month return as of March 31, 2000 trailed the performance of its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The fund's performance reflects our ongoing emphasis on companies with strong fundamentals and attractive valuations. By contrast, the index leaders were trading at astonishingly high prices relative to sales and earnings ratios. These stocks continued to climb dramatically in the first quarter of 2000, doubling in value from the end of 1999. Towards the end of the period, we witnessed a dramatic reversal. From their peaks, these market leaders shed half of their market value on average -- some in only a few days. While the fund benefited from the shift in investor sentiment that occurred late in the period, it was insufficient to offset the earlier shortfall. Even after pulling back from their highs, technology and biotechnology stocks still posted the strongest results for the six-month period. Due to high prices for many of these stocks, the fund was underweighted relative to the Russell 2000 Index, limiting the fund's gains. On the other hand, the fund's underweighting in financial stocks was beneficial as this sector lagged all others. Within the energy sector, our stock selection worked well. However, the positive impact was muted by its small -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + The Russell 2000 Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted measure of approximately 2000 small U.S. stocks. Index returns are calculated monthly and assume reinvestment of dividends. Unlike fund returns, index returns do not reflect any fees or expenses. All performance is historical and assumes reinvestment of all dividends and capital gains and is not indicative of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than when purchased. The adviser has agreed to maintain expenses until 1/31/01. If the adviser had not maintained expenses, total returns would have been lower. * The fund commenced operations on February 1, 1997. 38
N-30D41st Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 41st
size at about 3% of the index. In contrast, the technology and health care sectors represent 29% and 10% of the index, respectively. THE FUND'S INVESTMENT STRATEGY In the small-cap stock universe, we seek to add value through comprehensive stock research, disciplined portfolio construction, and efficient trading. Our intent is to capture the long-term opportunities of small-cap stocks through a systematic evaluation of risk and return. Ultimately, we expect this will result in competitive returns with less risk. Our strategy does not focus on picking a few big winners or sectors, but on building a portfolio with attractive overall characteristics. As a result, we have diversified the fund's portfolio among more than 200 stocks, with individual positions representing less than 2% of assets. Furthermore, the fund's holdings have strong fundamentals, such as above-average profitability and earnings growth. With a price/earnings ratio of less than 18x, the fund's overall portfolio is cheaper than the index. OUTLOOK The market's reversal at the end of the period can be attributed, in part, to the extremely high valuations of technology, biotech, and Internet stocks and a growing recognition of the risks of these stocks. Such a shift in the market is welcome news, given the fund's diversified approach to small-cap investing. While this change may be accompanied by increased volatility in the short run, management believes that it is likely to lead to more favorable performance over time. LARGEST EQUITY HOLDINGS BY SECTOR (EXCLUDES CASH EQUIVALENTS) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Technology (24%) 6. Health (8%) Titan Corp. ChiRex Inc. 2. Manufacturing (13%) 7. Financial (7%) Insight Enterprise, Inc. Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. 3. Consumer Discretionary (11%) 8. Utilities (4%) Thor Industries, Inc. NUI Corp. 4. Durables (9%) 9. Construction (4%) Aeroflex, Inc. Florida Rock Industries, Inc. 5. Service Industries (8%) 10. Consumer Staples (3%) ABM Industries, Inc. Michael Foods, Inc. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: FOR WHOM THE FUND IS DESIGNED The fund is designed for investors who: o Want long-term growth of principal o Are not looking for a source of regular income o Can invest for at least five years o Can handle potentially large ups and downs in investment performance o Are looking for a fund to invest in for the growth portion of one's portfolio --------------------------- ASSET ALLOCATION As of March 31, 2000 Stock Holdings 99% Cash Equivalents 1% ---- 100% ==== --------------------------- 39
N-30D42nd Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 42nd
AARP GLOBAL GROWTH FUND ----------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: GOAL The fund seeks to provide long-term capital growth while actively seeking to reduce downside risk as compared with other global growth funds. The fund pursues its goal by investing primarily in stocks issued by established companies in countries around the world including the United States. PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT TEAM William E. Holzer Lead Portfolio Manager Nicholas Bratt Diego Espinosa Portfolio Managers ------------------------- TOTAL RETURN As of March 31, 2000 CUMULATIVE FUND INDEX+ ------------------------- 1 yr. 28.12% 21.87% Life of Fund* 78.23% 102.53% AVERAGE ANNUAL FUND INDEX+ ------------------------- 1 yr. 28.12% 21.87% Life of Fund* 14.89% 18.45% ------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Major stock indices performed well during the six-month period, but their performance obscured a bear market in many sectors of the global equity universe. Across the globe, many stocks in the rapidly growing technology, telecommunications, and media sectors provided triple-digit returns, while "old economy" stocks, such as those in the manufacturing, food, energy, and banking industries, generally produced poor returns over the full period. THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A LINE CHART HERE LINE CHART TITLE: Growth of a $10,000 Investment CHART PERIOD: Semiannual Periods from February 1, 1996* to March 31, 2000 CHART DATA: AARP GLOBAL MSCI WORLD GROWTH FUND INDEX+ --------------------------------------------------- 2/1/96* $10000 $10000 3/96 10180 10224 9/96 10327 10661 3/97 11141 11181 9/97 12874 13231 3/98 14010 14754 9/98 12592 13248 3/99 13910 16619 9/99 14905 17155 3/00 17823 20253 FUND PERFORMANCE For the six-month period ended March 31, 2000, AARP Global Growth Fund returned 19.58%, which beat the 18.06% total return of its unmanaged benchmark, the MSCI World Index. Performance was helped by our holdings in new economy stocks, while holdings in defensive issues and commodities producers dampened returns. THE FUND'S INVESTMENT STRATEGY In managing the portfolio, we employ a theme-based approach that identifies long-term developments in the global economy, and seeks to invest in the companies best-positioned to capitalize on these trends. The fund is THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A MATRIX CHART HERE, SHOWING A THREE-YEAR RISK/RETURN PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND LINE CHART TITLE: AARP Global Growth Fund Three-Year Risk/Return Performance CHART DATA: (AARP Fund noted by XXXX) [Download Table] ----------------------------------- Morningstar Return Global Risk Peer Group ----------------------------------- Over the three years, this Highest Lowest fund is in the top 75% of Return Best 25% XXXX Risk similar funds for total return ------------ ----------- and among the top 25% of similar funds for monthly Next 25% downside risk. ------------ ----------- The monthly averages for risk XXXX Next 25% and return are for 77 similar ------------ ----------- funds for the period April 1, Lowest Highest 1997 through March 31, 2000. Return Worst 25% Risk ------------ ----------- Morningstar is the source for the peer group information of similar funds. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + The MSCI (Morgan Stanley Capital International) World Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted measure of global stock markets, including the U.S., Canada, Europe, Australia, and the Far East. Index returns assume dividends reinvested net of withholding tax and, unlike fund returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. All performance is historical and assumes reinvestment of all dividends and capital gains and is not indicative of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than when purchased. If the Adviser had not maintained expenses, the total return for the life of fund period would have been lower. * The fund commenced operations on February 1, 1996. 40
N-30D43rd Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 43rd
diversified along two major poles. On one pole are companies that are enabling consumers and businesses to take advantage of the Internet. Included in this category are makers of consumer devices, providers of Internet access, and content producers. In these areas we focus on companies whose business strategies are moving to Internet-based models, as well as existing companies that are successfully restructuring to adopt and combine Internet-driven business models for their suppliers and customers. These segments of the portfolio, which include companies such as Oracle, AT&T-Liberty Media Group, and Sony, produced strong performance over the period. On the other pole are holdings in old economy stocks, such as cyclicals, commodity producers, and defensive issues. In this part of the global economy, many companies are acting in a disciplined manner in consolidating, reducing capacity, and planning capital expenditures for a much more competitive world. In addition, there are signs that companies in these areas are gaining improved pricing power. Although the poor recent performance of these stocks has hampered fund returns, we find their value to be extremely compelling and believe that they remain crucial to portfolio diversification amid an increasingly volatile market environment. We are avoiding companies in between these two poles; namely, those with traditional business models that are being squeezed in the pincers of technology-driven price deflation on one hand and higher prices for commodities on the other. OUTLOOK While we are encouraged by the changes that are unfolding in the global economy -- such as reform, restructuring, and consolidation -- we are concerned about the euphoria that has lifted the technology sector worldwide. Although the fundamentals are strong for many of the top companies in this area, there are just as many companies whose stock prices are not supported by tangible earnings. For that reason, we will seek to participate in the tremendous growth of the industry by investing only in the tech stocks that we believe are positioned for strong earnings over the long-term. In addition, we will continue to diversify the portfolio by capitalizing on the value opportunities in areas of the market that are out of favor. [Enlarge/Download Table] 10 LARGEST EQUITY HOLDINGS (16% OF PORTFOLIO AS OF MARCH 31, 2000) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Oracle Corp. (U.S.) 6. Sony Corp. (Japan) 2. Daiwa Securities Group Inc. (Japan) 7. Canal Plus S.A. (France) 3. Reuters Group PLC (U.K.) 8. Enron Corp. (U.S.) 4. AT&T Corp.-Liberty Media Group (U.S.) 9. Carlton Communications PLC (U.K.) 5. Sharp Corp. (Japan) 10. Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Japan) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: FOR WHOM THE FUND IS DESIGNED The fund is designed for investors who: o Have a well-balanced portfolio of domestic investments and would like to gain some exposure to foreign markets o Do not need a source of regular income o Can invest for at least five years o Can handle potentially large ups and downs in investment performance ----------------------------- SECTOR DIVERSIFICATION -- EXCLUDES CASH EQUIVALENTs As of March 31, 2000 Financial 14% Manufacturing 13% Technology 12% Metals & Minerals 9% Communications 9% Energy 8% Utilities 6% Health 6% Media 5% Other 18% ---- 100% ==== ----------------------------- GEOGRAPHICAL DIVERSIFICATION -- EXCLUDES 3% CASH EQUIVALENTS As of March 31, 2000 U.S. & Canada 43% Europe 31% Japan 21% Pacific Basin 3% Africa 1% Latin America 1% ---- 100% ==== ----------------------------- 41
N-30D44th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 44th
AARP INTERNATIONAL STOCK FUND ----------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: GOAL The fund seeks to provide long-term capital growth while actively seeking to reduce downside risk as compared with other international mutual funds. The fund pursues its goal by investing primarily in common stocks of companies from developed countries outside the United States. The fund changed its name from the AARP International Growth and Income Fund on June 30, 1999. PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT TEAM Irene T. Cheng Lead Portfolio Manager Nicholas Bratt Carol L. Franklin Marc J. Slendebroek Portfolio Managers ------------------------- TOTAL RETURN As of March 31, 2000 CUMULATIVE FUND INDEX+ ------------------------- 1 yr. 39.45% 25.11% Life of Fund* 66.16% 60.48% AVERAGE ANNUAL FUND INDEX+ ------------------------- 1 yr. 39.45% 25.11% Life of Fund* 17.42% 16.12% ------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Boosted by a powerful rally in high-growth sectors such as technology, media, and telecommunications (known as "TMT" stocks), the international stock markets produced strong gains during the period. The sharp jump in the major global indices overshadowed dramatic declines in other sectors such as retailers, food producers, and heavy industries. Despite the negative impact of this trend on the portfolio's investments in metal, chemical, and steel companies, the downdraft was more than offset by significant weightings and solid stockpicking in the TMT area. THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A LINE CHART HERE LINE CHART TITLE: Growth of a $10,000 Investment CHART PERIOD: Semiannual Periods from February 1, 1997* to March 31, 2000 CHART DATA: AARP INTERNATIONAL MSCI EAFE STOCK FUND INDEX+ -------------------------------------------------- 2/1/97* $10000 $10000 3/97 10086 10201 9/97 11512 11443 3/98 12872 12097 9/98 11148 10487 3/99 11852 12827 9/99 12990 13731 3/00 16528 16048 FUND PERFORMANCE For the six months ended March 31, 2000, the fund returned 27.24%, beating the 16.87% return of its unmanaged benchmark, the MSCI EAFE Index. Our position in TMT stocks was the most important factor in the fund's strong performance. The fund's successful investments in this segment include Seat Pagine Gialle, the Italian business publisher and Internet portal operator; Vivendi, the French media and communications conglomerate; and LM Ericsson Telephone, the global leader in infrastructure for cellular telephony based in Sweden. THE FUND'S INVESTMENT STRATEGY Although we have benefited significantly from strong gains in TMT stocks during the past 18 months, we believe that expectations for the prospects of many companies in the group have moved to unsustainable levels. We have therefore reduced the fund's exposure to those areas where valuations have become less fundamentally grounded. As part of this process, we reduced or eliminated our exposure to stocks where a substantial part of the value could be attributed to businesses at a very early stage of development, and where valuations required more conceptual than tangible -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + All indices are unmanaged, capitalization-weighted, and in U.S. dollar terms. The MSCI (Morgan Stanley Capital International) EAFE Index is a measure of global stock markets, including Europe, Australia, and the Far East. The MSCI Europe Index represents the European market return; the MSCI Japan Index represents the Japanese market return. Index returns assume dividends are reinvested net of withholding tax and, unlike fund returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. All performance is historical and assumes reinvestment of all dividends and capital gains and is not indicative of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than when purchased. The adviser has agreed to maintain expenses until 1/31/01. If the adviser had not maintained expenses, total returns would have been lower. * The fund commenced operations on February 1, 1997. 42
N-30D45th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 45th
evidence. As part of the same process, we boosted positions in blue chip companies with strong market positions, sustainable long-term cashflows, and solid management teams. These additions were made in TMT companies as well as in other areas. We also hold a large position in companies that are undergoing significant change. The fund holds a number of companies that are in the process of restructuring, in order to take advantage of the potential gains in their earnings growth. The most important benefit of investing in these companies is their positive fundamentals. As a result, their relative performance tends to be strong in both up and down markets. Siemens, the largest German industrial company, provides an excellent illustration of this trend. During the last 24 months, the company has successfully restructured its business portfolio, reduced its operating costs, and drastically cut its product portfolio. Helped by an improving economic environment, this process has led to a sharp improvement in the company's earnings per share and stock price performance. OUTLOOK Despite the turbulence that has characterized the investment environment in recent months, we believe that the overseas markets continue to offer a wealth of opportunities. Tremendous changes are taking place on both the overall economic and the corporate levels. With a combination of strong fundamental research capabilities and a broad vision of the global economy, we believe that we will be able to position the fund in companies that are best able to take advantage of these changes. We have little doubt that the markets will continue to experience significant volatility in the months ahead, but we don't think it's productive to focus on the daily movements of the markets. Instead, we will continue to look for companies whose fundamentals are steadily improving, since over time their stock prices are likely to follow suit. 10 LARGEST EQUITY HOLDINGS (22% OF PORTFOLIO AS OF MARCH 31, 2000) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Vodafone AirTouch PLC (U.K.) 6. Vivendi (France) 2. Seat Pagine Gialle SpA (Italy) 7. Nokia Oyj (Finland) 3. Reuters Group PLC (U.K.) 8. Nomura Securities Co., Ltd. (Japan) 4. Total Fina ELF (France) 9. Epcos AG (Germany) 5. NTT Mobile Communications 10. Daiwa Securities Group Inc. (Japan) Network, Inc. (Japan) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIDEBAR TEXT: FOR WHOM THE FUND IS DESIGNED The fund is designed for investors who: o Have a well-balanced portfolio of domestic investments and would like to gain some exposure to foreign markets o Are not looking for a source of regular income o Can invest for at least five years o Can handle potentially large ups and downs in investment performance ---------------------------- SECTOR DIVERSIFICATION -- EXCLUDES CASH EQUIVALENTS As of March 31, 2000 Technology 18% Financial 15% Manufacturing 15% Communications 14% Service Industries 9% Energy 5% Consumer Staples 4% Metals & Minerals 4% Durables 3% Other 13% ---- 100% ==== ---------------------------- ASSET ALLOCATION As of March 31, 2000 Stock Holdings 97% Cash Equivalents 3% ---- 100% ==== ---------------------------- 43
N-30D46th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 46th
AARP MANAGED INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS: ----------------------------------- AARP DIVERSIFIED INCOME WITH GROWTH PORTFOLIO AARP DIVERSIFIED GROWTH PORTFOLIO SIDEBAR TEXT: GOAL The AARP Diversified Income with Growth Portfolio seeks current income with modest long-term appreciation. The portfolio pursues its goal by investing in at least five underlying AARP mutual funds, with an emphasis on income funds. The AARP Diversified Growth Portfolio seeks to provide long-term growth of capital. The portfolio pursues its goal by investing in at least five underlying AARP mutual funds, with an emphasis on the growth funds. In managing allocations among the underlying funds, each portfolio will generally make incremental adjustments. PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT TEAM Shahram Tajbakhsh Lead Portfolio Manager Salvatore J. Bruno Josephine W.K. Chu Portfolio Managers ------------------------- TOTAL RETURN DIVERSIFIED INCOME WITH GROWTH PORTFOLIO As of March 31, 2000 CUMULATIVE FUND INDEX+ ------------------------- 1 yr. 6.30% 6.72% Life of Fund* 27.59% 41.61% --------------------------- TOTAL RETURN DIVERSIFIED GROWTH PORTFOLIO As of March 31, 2000 CUMULATIVE FUND INDEX+ ------------------------- 1 yr. 14.85% 13.17% Life of Fund* 46.68% 73.44% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE For the six months ended March 31, 2000, AARP Diversified Income with Growth Portfolio returned 6.26%, representing 2.74% in distributions of income and 3.52% in capital change. The portfolio's blended benchmark index, which is comprised of the unmanaged Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index (70%) and the S&P 500 Index (30%), returned 4.43% for this period. THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A LINE CHART HERE LINE CHART TITLE: GROWTH OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT AARP DIVERSIFIED INCOME WITH GROWTH PORTFOLIO CHART PERIOD: Semiannual Periods from February 1, 1997* to March 31, 2000 CHART DATA: AARP DIVERSIFIED LEHMAN BROTHERS INCOME WITH STANDARD & POOR'S AGGREGATE BOND BLENDED GROWTH PORTFOLIO 500 INDEX INDEX INDEX+ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2/97* $10000 $10000 $10000 $10000 3/97 9987 9664 9914 9839 9/97 10935 12202 10621 11087 3/98 11574 14304 11102 12009 9/98 11522 13306 11842 12336 3/99 12003 16945 11821 13269 9/99 12007 17008 11796 13274 3/00 12759 19987 12042 14161 For the six months ended March 31, 2000, AARP Diversified Growth Portfolio returned 12.46%, representing 3.24% in distributions of income and 9.22% in capital change. The portfolio's blended benchmark index, which is comprised of the unmanaged S&P 500 Index (70%) and the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index (30%), returned 7.96% for this period. THE PRINTED DOCUMENT CONTAINS A LINE CHART HERE LINE CHART TITLE: GROWTH OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT AARP DIVERSIFIED GROWTH PORTFOLIO CHART PERIOD: Semiannual Periods from February 1, 1997* to March 31, 2000 CHART DATA: AARP DIVERSIFIED LEHMAN BROTHERS GROWTH STANDARD & POOR'S AGGREGATE BOND BLENDED PORTFOLIO 500 INDEX INDEX INDEX+ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2/97* $10000 $10000 $10000 $10000 3/97 9973 9664 9914 9739 9/97 11600 12202 10621 11720 3/98 12691 14304 11102 13290 9/98 11742 13306 11842 12926 3/99 12772 16945 11821 15326 9/99 13043 17008 11796 15367 3/00 14668 19987 12042 17344 INVESTMENT STRATEGIES The concentration of performance among a small group of high growth stocks proved challenging for the portfolios' conservatively managed asset allocation strategies, which focus on broad diversification across several asset classes. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + The performance of the blended benchmark is a weighting comprised of the Standard & Poor's 500 Index (S&P), and the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index. The 30/70 measure of the Diversified Income with Growth Portfolio and 70/30 measure of the Diversified Growth Portfolio is meant to reflect the anticipated long-range asset mix of each portfolio, which may change over time. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks. The index is designed to measure performance of the domestic stocks through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. The unmanaged Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index is a market-value-weighted measure of Treasury issues, agency issues, corporate bond issues, and mortgage securities. Index returns are calculated monthly and assume reinvestment of dividends. Unlike fund returns, index returns do not reflect any fees or expenses. All performance is historical and assumes reinvestment of all dividends and capital gains and is not indicative of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than when purchased. For certain underlying funds the adviser has agreed to maintain expenses until 1/31/01. If the adviser had not maintained expenses, total returns would have been lower. * These portfolios commenced operations on February 1, 1997. 44
N-30D47th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 47th
AARP Diversified Income with Growth Portfolio's exposure to equity funds made a significant contribution to performance during a period when fixed income funds struggled against the negative effects of rising interest rates. In the portfolio, we maintained our exposure to fixed income and equity funds at 68% and 31%, respectively. In the fixed income area, we continued to emphasize Bond Fund for Income and GNMA & U.S. Treasury Fund, with a smaller weighting in High Quality Short Term Bond Fund. In the equity portion of the portfolio, we made a minor shift out of Growth and Income Fund and into U.S. Stock Index Fund. AARP Diversified Growth Portfolio's exposure to a number of equity funds emphasizing growth stocks was an important contributor to performance. In the portfolio, we slightly increased our exposure to stock funds from 71% to 73% of assets over the period by reducing our fixed income fund holdings. Within the stock fund area, we increased exposure to U.S. Stock Index Fund and Capital Growth Fund. These two funds, which together constitute 48% of assets, benefited significantly from the strong performance of growth stocks over the six months. In particular, Capital Growth exceeded the performance of the S&P 500 by a wide margin with a 28.25% return, versus 17.52% for the index. DIVERSIFIED INCOME WITH GROWTH PORTFOLIO ALLOCATION As of March 31, 2000 ---------------------------------------- AARP GNMA and U.S. Treasury Fund 32% AARP Bond Fund for Income 30% AARP U.S. Stock Index Fund 24% AARP High Quality Short Term Bond Fund 7% AARP Growth and Income Fund 4% AARP Capital Growth Fund 2% AARP High Quality Money Fund 1% AARP Small Company Stock Fund 0% ----- 100% ===== DIVERSIFIED GROWTH PORTFOLIO ALLOCATION As of March 31, 2000 ---------------------------------------- AARP U.S. Stock Index Fund 37% AARP Bond Fund for Income 18% AARP Capital Growth Fund 11% AARP Growth and Income Fund 11% AARP GNMA and U.S. Treasury Fund 8% AARP Global Growth Fund 5% AARP Small Company Stock Fund 4% AARP International Stock Fund 4% AARP High Quality Money Fund 2% ----- 100% ===== OUTLOOK Market volatility increased significantly over the period, with the major market indices rising and falling by record amounts. In such an environment, the portfolios' diversified approaches and professional management can help to smooth out short-term swings over the long term. This approach can relieve investors of the need to manage asset allocations in changing market conditions. While the concentration of performance among a few growth stocks recently has not favored this approach, we are beginning to see signs of a shift in market sentiment that should bode well for the portfolios. SIDEBAR TEXT: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOR WHOM THE PORTFOLIOS ARE DESIGNED The Managed Investment Portfolios are designed for investors who: o Would like to build an overall portfolio with only one or a few investments o Can invest for at least three years in the AARP Diversified Income with Growth Portfolio, or for at least five years in the AARP Diversified Growth Portfolio o Can handle some ups and downs in investment performance ---------------------------- ASSET ALLOCATION AARP DIVERSIFIED INCOME WITH GROWTH PORTFOLIO As of March 31, 2000 Stock Fund Holdings 30% Bond Fund Holdings 69% Money Fund 1% ---- 100% ==== ---------------------------- ASSET ALLOCATION AARP DIVERSIFIED GROWTH PORTFOLIO As of March 31, 2000 Stock Fund Holdings 73% Bond Fund Holdings 26% Money Fund 1% ---- 100% ==== ---------------------------- 45
N-30D48th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 48th
This page intentionally left blank. 46
N-30D49th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 49th
I N V E S T M E N T P O R T F O L I O S List of investments as of March 31: A detailed breakdown of the investments in each fund portfolio at the close of the reporting period. Principal amount/shares: The face value of a bond or the shares held by the fund. Cost: The amount the fund actually paid for the listed securities. This section also shows the coupon rates and maturity dates of the funds' bond holdings. The coupon rate is the interest rate on a debt security the bond issuer promises to pay to the bond holder until maturity. The maturity date is the date on which a bond issuer is scheduled to repay the principal to the bond holder. Market value: The current value of the securities held in a fund's portfolio. 47
N-30D50th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 50th
This page intentionally left blank. 48
N-30D51st Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 51st
AARP HIGH QUALITY MONEY FUND [Enlarge/Download Table] LIST OF INVESTMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 (UNAUDITED) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS 0.2% ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State Street Bank and Trust Company, 6.05%, to be repurchased at $962,486 on 4/3/2000** (Cost $962,000) ........................................ 962,000 962,000 ----------- COMMERCIAL PAPER 65.6% ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Asset Portfolio Funding, 5.91%, 4/3/2000 ................................ 20,000,000 19,993,489 Barton Capital Corp., 5.92%, 4/14/2000 .................................. 20,000,000 19,957,678 Bavaria Universal Funding, 6%, 4/12/2000 ................................ 16,000,000 15,970,764 CXC Inc., 5.92%, 4/3/2000 ............................................... 20,000,000 19,993,478 Delaware Funding Corp., 5.91%, 4/20/2000 ................................ 20,000,000 19,938,250 Enterprise Funding Corp., 6.16%, 5/31/2000 .............................. 10,000,000 9,898,333 GIRO Funding Corp., 5.95%, 4/20/2000 .................................... 20,000,000 19,937,828 GMAC Mortgage Corp., 5.99%, 4/3/2000 .................................... 10,000,000 9,996,689 Moat Funding LLC, 5.92%, 4/10/2000 ...................................... 20,000,000 19,970,600 Monte Rosa Capital Corp., 5.9%, 4/11/2000 ............................... 20,000,000 19,967,500 Receivables Capital Corp., 5.93%, 4/12/2000 ............................. 20,000,000 19,964,158 Salomon Smith Barney Holdings, 5.92%, 4/18/2000 ......................... 15,000,000 14,958,492 Sigma Finance Inc., 5.91%, 4/13/2000 .................................... 20,000,000 19,960,933 Thunder Bay Funding Corp., 6.01%, 5/12/2000 ............................. 19,425,000 19,294,032 WCP Funding Inc., 5.96% 4/20/2000 ....................................... 10,000,000 9,968,914 ----------- Total Commercial Paper (Cost $259,771,138) .............................. 259,771,138 ----------- CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 19.0% ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Allfirst Bank, 6.18%, 9/7/2000* ......................................... 20,000,000 19,996,600 First Union National Bank, 6.14%, 7/26/2000* ............................ 20,000,000 20,000,000 Fleet National Bank, 6.28%, 8/14/2000* .................................. 15,000,000 14,995,622 Harris Trust & Savings Bank, 6.35%, 8/10/2000* .......................... 20,000,000 20,000,000 ----------- Total Certificates of Deposit (Cost $74,992,222) ........................ 74,992,222 ----------- SHORT-TERM AND MEDIUM-TERM NOTES 15.2% ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ford Motor Credit Corp., 6.104%, 11/24/2000* ............................ 20,000,000 20,002,473 Goldman Sachs Group, 5.99%, 4/17/2000* .................................. 20,000,000 20,000,000 Royal Bank of Scotland, 5.916%, 3/6/2001* ............................... 20,000,000 20,000,000 ----------- Total Short-Term and Medium-Term Notes (Cost $60,002,473) ............... 60,002,473 ----------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Investment Portfolio -- 100% (Cost $395,727,833) (a) ............... 395,727,833 =========== ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements 49
N-30D52nd Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 52nd
AARP HIGH QUALITY MONEY FUND -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Floating rate notes are securities whose interest rates vary with a designated market index or market rate, such as the coupon equivalent of the U.S. Treasury bill rate. These securities are shown at their rate as of March 31, 2000. ** Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Government agency securities. (a) At March 31, 2000, the cost for federal income tax purposes was $395,727,833. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At September 30, 1999, the Fund had a net tax basis capital loss carryforward of approximately $120,500, which may be applied against any net taxable capital gains of each succeeding year until fully utilized or until September 30, 2004 ($63,000) and September 30, 2005 ($57,500), the respective expiration dates. The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements 50
N-30D53rd Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 53rd
AARP HIGH QUALITY TAX FREE MONEY FUND [Enlarge/Download Table] LIST OF INVESTMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 (UNAUDITED) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ MUNICIPAL INVESTMENTS 100.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Alabama Alabama Special Care Facilities Financing Authority, Ascension Health Credit, Weekly Demand Note, Series B, 3.85%, 11/15/2039* ............................... 1,000,000 1,000,000 Arizona Pima County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, Tucson Electric Power Co., Series 1982, Weekly Demand Note, 3.9%, 10/1/2022* .............................. 3,900,000 3,900,000 Salt River, AZ, Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Tax Exempt Commercial Paper: 3.65%, 4/12/2000 ............................................................ 1,100,000 1,100,000 3.9%, 5/12/2000 ............................................................. 1,500,000 1,500,000 California Los Angeles, CA,, Regional Airport Improvement Lease, Series 1985, Daily Demand Note, 4.1%, 12/1/2025* ............................................ 1,800,000 1,800,000 Colorado Colorado Health Facilities Authority Revenue, Frasier Meadows Manor Project, Weekly Demand Note, 3.97%, 6/1/2021* ........................................... 990,000 990,000 District Of Columbia District of Columbia, General Obligation, Series B1, Daily Demand Note, 4.1%, 6/1/2003* ................................................................ 800,000 800,000 Florida Florida Housing Finance Agency, Multi-Family Housing, Weekly Demand Note, 4%, 7/1/2008* .............................................. 1,200,000 1,200,000 Indian River County, FL, District Hospital Revenue, Weekly Demand Note, 4%, 10/1/2015* ................................................................. 1,000,000 1,000,000 Orange City, FL, Health Facilities Authority Revenue, Tax Exempt Commercial Paper, 4.1%, 5/11/2000 (b) ..................................................... 2,000,000 2,000,000 Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority Revenue, Presbyterian Retirement, Weekly Demand Note, 4.05%, 11/1/2028* .......................................... 900,000 900,000 Pinellas City, FL, Educational Facilities, Tax Exempt Commercial Paper: 4.1%, 5/9/2000 (b) ............................................................. 1,000,000 1,000,000 4.05%, 5/15/2000 (b) ........................................................... 1,000,000 1,000,000 Putnam County, FL, Pollution Control Revenue, Seminole Electric Cooperative Finance Corp., 1984 Series H-1, Weekly Demand Note, 3.95%, 3/15/2014* .......... 3,850,000 3,850,000 Sarasota, FL, County Hospital, Tax Exempt Commercial Paper, 3.95%, 5/12/2000 ...... 1,500,000 1,500,000 University of Northern Florida, Capital Improvement Revenue, Weekly Demand Note, 3.95%, 11/1/2024* .......................................... 1,000,000 1,000,000 Georgia Fayette County, GA, Educational Facilities Revenue, Catholic School Properties Inc. Project, Weekly Demand Note, 3.95%, 4/1/2024* .................................. 2,000,000 2,000,000 Fulton County, GA, Development Authority Revenue, United Way of Metro Atlanta, Weekly Demand Note, 3.9%, 6/1/2024* ............................................ 3,000,000 3,000,000 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements 51
N-30D54th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 54th
AARP HIGH QUALITY TAX FREE MONEY FUND [Enlarge/Download Table] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gainsville, GA, Redevelopment Authority, Riverside Military Project, Weekly Demand Note, 3.95%, 7/1/2024* ........................................ 1,000,000 1,000,000 Illinois Alsip, IL, Industrial Development Revenue, Keeble Co. Project, Weekly Demand Note, 4%, 10/1/2004* .......................................... 3,750,000 3,750,000 Illinois Health Facilities Authority Revenue, Tax Exempt Commercial Paper, 3.75%, 4/11/2000 ............................................................ 2,000,000 2,000,000 Indiana Fort Wayne, IN, Pollution Control Revenue, Weekly Demand Note, 4%, 11/1/2005* .. 1,000,000 1,000,000 Indiana Health Financing Authority Revenue, Ascension Health Credit, Series B, 3.85%, 11/15/2039 ................................................. 1,500,000 1,500,000 Jasper County, IN, Pollution Control Revenue, Northern Indiana Public Services, Series C, Daily Demand Note, 4%, 4/1/2019* .................................. 600,000 600,000 Kentucky Danville County, KY, Tax Exempt Commercial Paper, 3.75%, 4/12/2000 ............. 1,000,000 1,000,000 Mayfield, KY, Multi-City Lease Revenue, Kentucky League of Cities Funding Trust, Weekly Demand Note, Series 1996, 3.95%, 7/1/2026* ........................... 755,000 755,000 Pendleton, KY, City Lease Revenue, Tax Exempt Commercial Paper: 3.65%, 4/7/2000 ............................................................. 1,000,000 1,000,000 3.65%, 4/10/2000 ............................................................ 1,000,000 1,000,000 Louisiana Louisiana Public Finance Authority, Tax Exempt Commercial Paper, 3.85%, 4/12/2000 (b) ........................................................ 1,535,000 1,535,000 Michigan Michigan State Strategic Fund Pollution, Control Revenue, General Motors Corp., Weekly Demand Note, 4%, 4/1/2008* ........................................... 1,300,000 1,300,000 University of Michigan, University Revenue, Series 1995A, Daily Demand Note, 4%, 12/1/2027* .............................................................. 1,100,000 1,100,000 Minnesota Cottage Grove, MN, Environmental Control Revenue, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Series 1982, Weekly Demand Note, 4.017%, 8/1/2012* ....... 300,000 300,000 Missouri Missouri Environmental Improvement & Energy Authority, Tax Exempt Commercial Paper, 3.95%, 4/24/2000 .......................................... 1,100,000 1,100,000 Nevada Las Vegas, NV, Valley Water Authority District, Tax Exempt Commercial Paper, 3.6%, 4/10/2000 ............................................................. 2,000,000 2,000,000 New Hampshire New Hampshire General Obligation, Tax Exempt Commercial Paper, 3.95%, 5/9/2000 ............................................................. 2,000,000 2,000,000 New York Nassau County, NY, Tax Anticipation Note, Series B, 4.75%, 8/31/2000 ........... 1,000,000 1,003,027 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements 52
N-30D55th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 55th
[Enlarge/Download Table] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- North Carolina North Carolina Medical Care Community, Retirement Community Revenue, Weekly Demand Note, 3.95%, 11/15/2009* ...................................... 4,000,000 4,000,000 Ohio Medina County, OH, Health Care Facilities Revenue, Weekly Demand Note, 3.97%, 12/1/2023* ........................................................... 3,000,000 3,000,000 Oklahoma Oklahoma City, OK, General Obligation, Tax Exempt Commercial Paper, 3.95%, 5/8/2000 (b) ......................................................... 1,500,000 1,500,000 Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, University of Pennsylvania Health Services, Series B, Weekly Demand Note, 3.9%, 1/1/2026* (b) .......... 1,000,000 1,000,000 Philadelphia, PA, Tax and Revenue Anticipation Note, Series A, 4.25%, 6/30/2000 700,000 701,250 Texas Harris City, TX, General Obligation, Tax Exempt Commercial Paper: 3.8%, 4/14/2000 ............................................................. 1,500,000 1,500,000 3.9%, 5/11/2000 ............................................................. 1,500,000 1,500,000 Harris County, TX, Health Facilities Authority Revenue, Saint Lukes Episcopal Hospital, Series A, Daily Demand Note, 4.1%, 2/15/2027* ........... 1,000,000 1,000,000 Houston, TX, Water and Sewer Authority, Tax Exempt Commercial Paper, 3.85%, 4/7/2000 ............................................................. 1,000,000 1,000,000 San Antonio, TX, Electric and Gas, Tax Exempt Commercial Paper, 3.65%, 4/11/2000 ............................................................ 2,100,000 2,100,000 State of Texas, Tax and Revenue Anticipation Note, 4.5%, 8/31/2000 ............. 2,800,000 2,808,833 Tarrant County, TX, Health Facility Authority Revenue, Adventist Health Systems, Weekly Demand Note, 3.95%, 11/15/2027* ...................................... 2,000,000 2,000,000 Texas Small Business Industrial Development Corp., Industrial Development Revenue, Weekly Demand Note, 3.95%, 7/1/2026* ............................... 3,400,000 3,400,000 University of Texas, TX, Higher Education Authority, Series A, Tax Exempt Commercial Paper, 3.95%, 5/11/2000 ............................... 1,500,000 1,500,000 Virginia Albemarle County, VA, Industrial Development Authority, University of Virginia Health Services, 3.9%, 10/1/2022 ............................................ 1,000,000 1,000,000 Tennessee Clarksville, TN, Public Building Authority, Pooled Financings, Series 1994, Weekly Demand Note, 4%, 6/1/2024* ........................................... 1,900,000 1,900,000 Vermont Vermont Educational & Health Buildings Finance Agency Revenue, Weekly Demand Note, 3.95%, 12/1/2030* ....................................... 1,000,000 1,000,000 ----------- Total Municipal Investments (Cost $84,393,110) ................................. 84,393,110 ----------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Investment Portfolio-- 100% (Cost $84,393,110) (a) ....................... 84,393,110 =========== ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements 53
N-30D56th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 56th
AARP HIGH QUALITY TAX FREE MONEY FUND -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Floating rate and monthly, weekly, or daily demand notes are securities whose interest rates vary with a designated market index or market rate, such as the coupon-equivalent of the U.S. Treasury bill rate. Variable rate demand notes are securities whose interest rates are reset periodically at levels that are generally comparable to tax exempt commercial paper. These securities are payable on demand within seven calendar days and normally incorporate an irrevocable letter of credit or line of credit from a major bank. These notes are carried, for purposes of calculating average weighted maturity, at the longer of the period remaining until the next rate change or to the extent of the demand period. These securities are shown at their current rate as of March 31, 2000. (a) At March 31, 2000, the cost for federal income tax purposes was $84,393,110. (b) Bond is insured by one of these companies: AMBAC, FGIC, FSA, BIG, or MBIA. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At September 30, 1999, the Fund had a net tax basis capital loss carryforward of approximately $739,600, which may be applied against any realized net taxable capital gains of each succeeding year until fully utilized or until September 30, 2000 ($324,000), September 30, 2001 ($400), September 30, 2003 ($89,000), September 30, 2004 ($5,000), September 30, 2005 ($218,000), September 30, 2006 ($103,000), and September 30, 2007 ($200), the respective expiration dates. The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements 54
N-30D57th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 57th
AARP PREMIUM MONEY FUND [Enlarge/Download Table] LIST OF INVESTMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 (UNAUDITED) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS 1.8% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State Street Bank and Trust Company, 6.05%, to be repurchased at $4,397,217 on 4/3/2000** (Cost $4,395,000) ........................................ 4,395,000 4,395,000 ------------ COMMERCIAL PAPER 65.1% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alpine Securitization Corp., 6.15%, 6/15/2000 ............................. 9,049,000 8,933,061 American Home Products Corp., 5.9%, 4/28/2000 ............................. 9,000,000 8,960,175 Barton Capital Corp., 5.85%, 4/6/2000 ..................................... 10,000,000 9,991,875 Bavaria Finance Funding, 6.03%, 4/4/2000 .................................. 10,000,000 9,994,975 Bavaria Universal Funding, 5.91%, 4/11/2000 ............................... 10,000,000 9,983,583 CXC Inc., 5.87%, 4/3/2000 ................................................. 7,450,000 7,447,570 GIRO Funding Corp., 5.87%, 4/3/2000 ....................................... 11,000,000 10,996,413 GMAC Mortgage Corp., 5.96%, 4/3/2000 ...................................... 1,000,000 999,669 Knight-Ridder Inc., 5.87%, 4/12/2000 ...................................... 10,000,000 9,982,064 MCI Worldcom Inc., 5.98%, 5/5/2000 ........................................ 11,000,000 10,937,874 Moat Funding LLC, 6.05%, 4/5/2000 ......................................... 5,000,000 4,996,639 Monte Rosa Capital Corp., 5.85%, 4/6/2000 ................................. 10,000,000 9,991,875 Pemex Capital Inc., 6.07%, 4/7/2000 ....................................... 9,000,000 8,990,895 Pemex Capital Inc., 6.29%, 9/21/2000 ...................................... 12,000,000 11,637,277 Quincy Capital Corp., 6.19%, 7/12/2000 .................................... 11,230,000 11,032,885 Stellar Funding Group, 5.87%, 4/7/2000 .................................... 8,000,000 7,992,173 Superior Funding Capital, 5.87%, 4/6/2000 ................................. 9,289,000 9,281,427 Thunder Bay Funding Corp., 5.86%, 4/14/2000 ............................... 10,000,000 9,978,839 ------------ Total Commercial Paper (Cost $162,129,269) ................................ 162,129,269 ------------ CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 14.8% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- American Express Centurian Bank, 6.23%, 6/19/2000* ........................ 6,500,000 6,497,541 Credit Suisse First Boston Corp., 6.22%, 6/9/2000* ........................ 5,000,000 5,000,000 Deutsche Bank AG, 6.14%, 4/17/2000* ....................................... 2,000,000 1,999,949 Finova Capital Corp., 6.19%, 6/12/2000* ................................... 5,000,000 5,000,000 First National Bank of Maryland, 6.09%, 8/7/2000* ......................... 5,000,000 4,999,040 First Union National Bank, 6.14%, 7/26/2000* .............................. 5,000,000 5,000,000 Old Kent Bank, 6.19%, 6/16/2000* .......................................... 4,000,000 3,999,673 Royal Bank of Scotland, 5.89%, 12/11/2000* ................................ 4,500,000 4,497,548 ------------ Total Certificates Of Deposit (Cost $36,993,751) .......................... 36,993,751 ------------ The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements 55
N-30D58th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 58th
AARP PREMIUM MONEY FUND [Enlarge/Download Table] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SHORT-TERM AND MEDIUM-TERM NOTES 18.3% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beneficial Corp., 6.22%, 9/5/2000* ...................... 1,000,000 1,000,090 Comerica Bank, 5.94%, 1/12/2001* ........................ 7,500,000 7,497,692 Goldman Sachs Group, 5.99%, 4/17/2000* .................. 11,000,000 11,000,000 GTE Corp., 6.16%, 6/12/2000* ............................ 6,000,000 5,999,088 Heller Financial Inc., 6.32%, 6/1/2000* ................. 3,000,000 3,000,648 Heller Financial Inc., 6.42%, 9/25/2000* ................ 1,000,000 1,000,341 PNC Bank Corp., 5.84%, 7/12/2000* ....................... 10,000,000 9,997,765 U.S. Bank NA, 6.05%, 7/19/2000* ......................... 6,000,000 5,998,715 ------------ Total Short-Term and Medium-Term Notes (Cost $45,494,339) 45,494,339 ------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Investment Portfolio -- 100% (Cost $249,012,359) (a) 249,012,359 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Floating rate notes are securities whose interest rates vary with a designated market index or market rate, such as the coupon equivalent of the U.S. Treasury bill rate. The securities are shown at their rate as of March 31, 2000. ** Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Government agency securities. (a) At March 31, 2000, the cost for federal income tax purposes was $249,012,359. The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements 56
N-30D59th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 59th
[Enlarge/Download Table] AARP HIGH QUALITY SHORT TERM BOND FUND LIST OF INVESTMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 (UNAUDITED) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS 5.7% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State Street Bank and Trust Company, 6.05%, to be repurchased at $20,966,565 on 4/3/2000** (Cost $20,956,000) .............................................. 20,956,000 20,956,000 ----------- SHORT-TERM INVESTMENT 3.3% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 6.05%, 4/3/2000 (Cost $11,993,950) .......... 12,000,000 11,993,950 ----------- U.S. TREASURY OBLIGATIONS 3.2% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- U.S. Treasury Note, 7%, 7/15/2006 (Cost $11,790,091) .......................... 11,500,000 11,884,560 ----------- GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION* 4.6% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Government National Mortgage Association REMIC, 6.37%, 9/20/2024 .............. 5,119,033 5,130,193 Government National Mortgage Association, 7%, 4/1/2015 (b) .................... 5,000,000 4,931,250 Government National Mortgage Association, 7.5% with various maturities to 11/1/2014 ............................................................... 2,289,263 2,292,125 Government National Mortgage Association, 8% with various maturities to 8/15/2012 ............................................................... 3,416,194 3,464,226 Government National Mortgage Association, 8.5%, 11/15/2009 .................... 3,473,797 3,536,568 ----------- Total Government National Mortgage Association (Cost $19,477,663) ............. 19,354,362 ----------- U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY PASS-THRUS* 2.1% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Student Loan Marketing Association, 6.24%, 1/25/2013 (Cost $7,600,000) ........ 7,600,000 7,600,000 ----------- U.S. GOVERNMENT BACKED MORTGAGES* 23.4% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Association, 6%, 2/15/2017 ......................... 9,000,000 8,738,370 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. 5.75%, 3/15/2009 ............................. 3,150,000 2,853,711 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 6%, 11/15/2017 .............................. 7,000,000 6,818,420 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 7.06%, 6/25/2016 ............................ 4,100,000 4,048,750 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 6.75%, 8/15/2016 ............................ 4,500,000 4,457,109 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 6.15%, 3/15/2021 ............................ 3,000,000 2,936,250 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 6.275%, 11/25/2029 .......................... 19,063,611 19,081,484 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 5.96% to 5/25/2030 .......................... 8,990,805 8,997,829 Federal National Mortgage Association, 6%, 1/18/2014 .......................... 3,100,000 3,038,961 Federal National Mortgage Association, 6.5%, 3/25/2014 ........................ 5,300,000 5,218,844 Federal National Mortgage Association, 6.5%, 4/25/2014 ........................ 6,000,000 5,906,250 Federal National Mortgage Association, 6%, 7/25/2017 .......................... 7,700,000 7,517,125 Federal National Mortgage Association, 7.5% with various maturities to 10/1/2015 ............................................................... 4,451,588 4,457,150 Federal National Mortgage Association 8% with various maturities to 12/1/2009 ............................................................... 4,956,803 5,012,567 Residential Funding Mortgage Security, 7.82%, 4/28/2022 ....................... 813,452 811,923 ----------- Total U.S. Government Backed Mortgages (Cost $90,686,688) ..................... 89,894,743 ----------- The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements 57
N-30D60th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 60th
AARP HIGH QUALITY SHORT TERM BOND FUND --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ASSET BACKED* 20.9% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Miscellaneous Receivables 1.2% Coast-Plymouth Tax Lien Capital, LLC, Series 1999-A A, 6.76%, 11/15/2004 .... 4,303,348 4,276,452 ----------- Automobile Receivables 3.9% Capital Automobile Receivable Asset Trust, Series 1999-1 A2, 5.58%, 6/15/2002 4,758,000 4,708,933 Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust, Series 1998-C A5, 5.86%, 10/15/2002 ........... 4,500,000 4,431,094 Premier Auto Trust, Series 1999-2 A4, 5.59%, 2/9/2004 ....................... 5,400,000 5,197,500 ----------- 14,337,527 ----------- Credit Card Receivables 6.2% CNL Funding, Series 1999-1 A1, 7.295%, 3/18/2010 ............................ 2,546,015 2,484,752 Discover Card Master Trust I, Series 2000-2 A, 6.18%, 9/18/2007 ............. 7,500,000 7,495,313 Discover Card Master Trust I, Series 1996-4 A, 6.38%, 10/16/2013 ............ 4,000,000 4,036,250 MBNA Master Credit Card Trust, Series 1996-C B, 6.28%, 8/15/2003 ............ 5,000,000 5,000,000 Sears Credit Account Master Trust, Series 1999-3, 6.45%, 11/15/2005 ......... 4,000,000 3,863,750 ----------- 22,880,065 ----------- Home Equity Loans 5.4% EQCC Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 1996-4 A6, 6.88%, 7/15/2004 ............. 3,000,000 2,981,250 Greenpoint Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 1999-2 A2, 6.38%, 12/15/2025 ...... 4,892,542 4,897,129 HFC Home Equity Loan, Asset Backed Certificate, Series 1999-1 A2, 6.95%, 10/20/2023 ............................................................... 2,700,000 2,678,063 Residential Asset Securities Corp., Series 1999-K53 AF3, 7.18%, 1/25/2025 ... 4,500,000 4,391,719 Residential Funding Mortgage Securities, Inc. Series 2000-HI1 A12, 7.58%, 9/25/2010 ................................................................ 5,000,000 4,999,219 ----------- 19,947,380 ----------- Manufactured Housing Receivables 4.2% GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc., Series 1999-HE3 A2, 7%, 8/25/2013 ....... 4,500,000 4,452,891 Green Tree Financial Corp. Series 1993-4 B1, 7.2%, 1/15/2019 ................ 3,113,361 2,962,071 Green Tree Financial Corp. Series 1997-1 B1, 7.23%, 3/15/2028 ............... 4,000,000 3,380,000 Green Tree Financial Corp. Series 1997-2 B2, 8.05%, 6/15/2028 ............... 1,478,760 1,150,198 Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Inc., "B", Series 1991-D 9.85%, 7/15/2011 .. 3,389,649 3,447,883 ----------- 15,393,043 ----------- Total Asset Backed (Cost $78,332,808) ....................................... 76,834,467 ----------- CORPORATE BONDS 36.8% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Consumer Discretionary 2.2% Wal-Mart Stores Inc., 5.85%, 6/1/2000 (c) ................................... 8,000,000 7,989,280 ----------- Consumer Staples 2.7% Gillette Company, 5.75%, 8/3/2001 ........................................... 5,000,000 4,906,000 Safeway Inc., 7%, 9/15/2002 ................................................. 5,000,000 4,936,050 ----------- 9,842,050 ----------- Communications 3.9% Sprint Capital Corp., 5.875%, 5/1/2004 ...................................... 5,000,000 4,740,750 US West Communications, 6.375%, 10/15/2002 .................................. 5,000,000 4,880,700 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements 58
N-30D61st Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 61st
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WorldCom, Inc., 6.125%, 8/15/2001 ....................... 5,000,000 4,923,850 ------------ 14,545,300 ------------ Financial 17.9% Associates Corp of North America, 6.21%, 2/22/2002 ...... 5,000,000 4,998,431 Bank One Milwaukee N.A., 6.625%, 4/15/2003 .............. 5,000,000 4,913,650 Bank of America Corp., 6.625%, 6/15/2004 ................ 5,000,000 4,858,350 CIT Group, Inc., 7.375%, 3/15/2003 ...................... 3,500,000 3,502,065 Capital One Bank, 6.57%, 1/27/2003 ...................... 4,000,000 3,890,000 Chase Manhattan Corp., 5.75%, 4/15/2004 ................. 5,000,000 4,715,800 EOP Operating L.P., 6.375%, 2/15/2003 ................... 6,000,000 5,773,560 FleetBoston Financial Group, 6.458%, 3/27/2003 .......... 5,000,000 5,000,550 General Electric Capital Corp., 6.02%, 5/4/2001 ......... 5,000,000 4,965,625 Heller Financial Inc., 5.48%, 2/5/2001 .................. 500,000 492,480 NBD Bank NA Michigan, 6.25%, 8/15/2003 .................. 3,000,000 2,901,480 Prudential Funding Corp, 6.19%, 2/15/2002 ............... 10,000,000 9,977,100 Transamerica Finance Corp., 7.25%, 8/15/2002 ............ 5,000,000 4,963,600 Wells Fargo Co., 6.5%, 9/3/2002 ......................... 5,000,000 4,917,950 ------------ 65,870,641 ------------ Media 1.3% Cox Communications, Inc., 7.5%, 8/15/2004 ............... 5,000,000 4,992,900 ------------ Service Industries 1.3% USA Waste Services, Inc., 6.125%, 7/15/2001 ............. 5,000,000 4,775,000 ------------ Durables 2.7% DaimlerChrysler NA Holdings, 6.84%, 10/15/2002 .......... 5,000,000 4,954,250 General Motors Acceptance Corp., 6.75%, 12/10/2002 ...... 5,000,000 4,937,000 ------------ 9,891,250 ------------ Technology 2.4% International Business Machines Corp., 7.25%, 11/1/2002 . 4,000,000 4,019,800 Raytheon Co., 6.45%, 8/15/2002 .......................... 5,000,000 4,855,050 ------------ 8,874,850 ------------ Energy 1.3% Atlantic Richfield Co., 5.55%, 4/15/2003 ................ 5,000,000 4,761,250 ------------ Utilities 1.1% Detroit Edison Co., 5.93%, 2/1/2001 ..................... 4,000,000 3,963,360 ------------ Total Corporate Bonds (Cost $137,432,986) ............... 135,505,881 ------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Investment Portfolio -- 100% (Cost $378,270,186) (a) .............................. 374,023,963 ============ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements 59
N-30D62nd Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 62nd
AARP HIGH QUALITY SHORT TERM BOND FUND -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Effective maturities may be shorter due to prepayments. ** Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Government agency securities. (a) At March 31, 2000, the net unrealized depreciation on investments based on cost for federal income tax purposes of $378,270,500 was as follows: Aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all investments in which there is an excess of value over tax cost ............................................ $ 327,863 Aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all investments in which there is an excess of tax cost over value ............................................... (4,574,400) -------------- Net unrealized depreciation .............................. $ (4,246,537) ============== (b) When issued or forward delivery pools included. (c) At March 31, 2000, this security, in part or in whole, has been segregated to cover when issued or forward delivery securities. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Purchases and sales of investment securities (excluding short-term investments and direct obligations of the U.S. Government) for the six months ended March 31, 2000 aggregated $427,423,441 and $487,497,024, respectively. Purchases and sales of direct obligations of the U.S. Government aggregated $217,227,415 and $214,444,648, respectively. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At September 30, 1999, the Fund had a net tax basis capital loss carryforward of approximately $1,293,000, which may be applied against any realized net taxable capital gains of each succeeding year until fully realized, or until September 30, 2005 ($1,182,000) and September 30, 2007 ($111,000), the respective expiration dates. In addition, from November 1, 1998 through September 30, 1999, the Fund incurred approximately $2,650,000 of net realized capital losses. As permitted by tax regulations, the Fund intends to elect to defer these losses and treat them as arising in the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000. The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements 60
N-30D63rd Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 63rd
[Enlarge/Download Table] AARP GNMA AND U.S. TREASURY FUND LIST OF INVESTMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 (UNAUDITED) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS** 17.5% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Goldman Sachs, 6%, to be repurchased at $180,090,000 on 4/3/2000** ....... 180,000,000 180,000,000 Merrill Lynch, 6%, to be repurchased at $170,141,667 on 4/5/2000** ....... 170,000,000 170,000,000 Morgan Stanley, 6.01%, to be repurchased at $198,165,275 on 4/5/2000 ..... 198,000,000 198,000,000 Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette, 6.06%, to be repurchased at $100,050,500 on 4/3/2000 ........................................................... 100,000,000 100,000,000 Salomon Smith Barney, 6.11%, to be repurchased at $100,067,889 on 4/4/2000 100,000,000 100,000,000 State Street Bank and Trust Company, 6.05%, to be repurchased at $118,185,555 on 4/3/2000 .............................................. 118,126,000 118,126,000 ------------- Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost $866,126,000) .......................... 866,126,000 ------------- U.S. GOVERNMENT & AGENCIES 6.0% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- U.S. Treasury Bond, 10.625%, 8/15/2015 ................................... 149,100,000 212,980,404 U.S. Treasury Bond, 6.625%, 2/15/2027 .................................... 60,500,000 64,905,005 U.S. Treasury Note, 7%, 7/15/2006 ........................................ 15,300,000 15,811,632 ------------- Total U.S. Government & Agencies (Cost $287,900,782) ..................... 293,697,041 ------------- GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION* 76.5% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6% with various maturities to 2/15/2029 (c) .............................. 34,593,387 31,620,517 6.5% with various maturities to 5/15/2029 (c) ............................ 1,146,319,822 1,085,632,911 7% with various maturities to 3/15/2030 (b)(c) ........................... 1,209,099,949 1,172,016,823 7.5% with various maturities to 4/1/2030 (b)(c) .......................... 758,788,705 753,081,559 8% with various maturities to 5/1/2030 (b)(c) ............................ 357,258,559 361,263,388 8.5% with various maturities to 4/1/2030 (b)(c) .......................... 242,118,611 248,268,705 9% with various maturities to 3/15/2030 (c) .............................. 113,526,182 117,664,467 9.5% with various maturities to 1/15/2021 (c) ............................ 39,817 41,756 10.5% with various maturities to 1/20/2021 (c) ........................... 5,382,075 5,843,584 11.5% with various maturities to 2/15/2016 (c) ........................... 1,398,800 1,554,731 12% with various maturities to 7/15/2015 (c) ............................. 2,727,677 3,058,510 12.5% with various maturities to 8/15/2015 (c) ........................... 2,205,828 2,500,005 13% with various maturities to 7/15/2015 (c) ............................. 245,175 280,751 13.5% with various maturities to 10/15/2014 (c) .......................... 355,739 412,512 14% with various maturities to 12/15/2014 (c) ............................ 212,263 245,942 14.5% with various maturities to 10/15/2014 (c) .......................... 64,218 75,677 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements 61
N-30D64th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 64th
AARP GNMA AND U.S. TREASURY FUND ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15% with various maturities to 10/15/2012 (c) ...................... 168,725 199,632 16% with various maturities to 2/15/2012 (c) ....................... 50,095 59,385 ----------------- Total Government National Mortgage Association (Cost $3,841,900,840) 3,783,820,855 ----------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Investment Portfolio-- 100% (Cost $4,995,927,622) (a) ........ 4,943,643,896 ================= -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Effective maturities may be shorter due to prepayments. ** Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Government agency securities. (a) At March 31, 2000, the net unrealized depreciation on investments based on cost for federal income tax purposes of $4,995,927,622 was as follows: Aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all investments in which there is an excess of value over tax cost .......................................... $ 7,439,739 Aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all investments in which there is an excess of tax cost over value ............................................. (59,723,465) --------------- Net unrealized depreciation ............................ $ (52,283,726) =============== (b) When issued or forward delivery pools included. (c) At March 31, 2000, these securities, in part or in whole, has been segregated to cover when issued or forward delivery pools. At March 31, 2000, open futures contracts sold short were as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Unrealized Number of Aggregate Appreciation/ Futures Expiration Date Contracts Face Value ($) Value ($) (Depreciation) ------- --------------- --------- -------------- --------- -------------- U.S. Treasury Note June, 2000 936 91,378,874 91,801,125 $ (422,251) U.S. Treasury Note June, 2000 1,729 167,841,368 170,306,500 (2,465,132) U.S. Treasury Bond June, 2000 696 67,625,854 67,990,500 (364,646) ----------- Total net unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts .......................................... $(3,252,029) ============ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Purchases and sales of investment securities (excluding short-term investments and direct obligations of the U.S. Government) for the six months ended March 31, 2000 aggregated $5,342,476,518 and $5,646,765,213, respectively. Purchases and sales of direct obligations of the U.S. Government aggregated $1,302,873,076 and $1,280,867,719, respectively. Purchases and sales of mortgage dollar roll transactions aggregated $1,173,317,644 and $1,174,899,928, respectively. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At September 30, 1999, the Fund had a net tax basis capital loss carryforward of approximately $243,324,000 which may be applied against any realized net taxable capital gains of each succeeding year until fully utilized or until September 30, 2003, the expiration date. In addition, from November 1, 1998 through September 30, 1999, the Fund incurred approximately $88,000,000 of net realized capital losses. As permitted by tax regulations, the Fund intends to elect to defer these losses and treat them as arising in the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000. The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements 62
N-30D65th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 65th
[Enlarge/Download Table] AARP INSURED TAX FREE GENERAL BOND FUND LIST OF INVESTMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 (UNAUDITED) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SHORT-TERM MUNICIPAL INVESTMENTS 0.7% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Indiana Jasper County, IN, Pollution Control Revenue, Northern Indiana Public Services, Series C, Daily Demand Note, 4%, 4/1/2019* .................................... 7,400,000 7,400,000 Texas Harris County, TX, Health Facilities Authority Revenue, Saint Lukes Episcopal Hospital, Series A, Daily Demand Note, 4.1%, 2/15/2027* ....................... 2,255,000 2,255,000 -------------- Total Short-Term Municipal Investments (Cost $9,655,000) ......................... 9,655,000 -------------- LONG-TERM MUNICIPAL INVESTMENTS 99.3% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alaska North Slope Borough, AK, General Obligation, Series 1997A, Zero Coupon, 6/30/2008 (b) ................................................................. 7,000,000 4,506,460 North Slope Borough, AK, General Obligation, Capital Appreciation: Series A, Zero Coupon, 6/30/2006 (b) .......................................... 4,000,000 2,879,240 Series A, Zero Coupon, 6/30/2007 (b) .......................................... 5,000,000 3,405,000 Series B, Zero Coupon, 6/30/2004 (b) .......................................... 15,500,000 12,456,575 Series B, Zero Coupon, 6/30/2005 (b) .......................................... 25,600,000 19,472,128 Arizona Arizona Municipal Finance Program, Certificate of Participation, Series 25, 7.875%, 8/1/2014 (b) .......................................................... 3,500,000 4,333,174 Maricopa County, AZ: School District #6, Washington Elementary, Series B, 4.1%, 7/1/2013 (b) ....... 2,950,000 2,554,730 School District #28, Kyrene Elementary, Series B, Zero Coupon, 1/1/2004 (b) ... 4,000,000 3,314,040 Unified School District #41, Gilbert School, Zero Coupon, 1/1/2005 (b) ........ 5,280,000 4,150,872 California Alameda County, CA, Certificate of Participation, Santa Rita Jail Project, 5.375%, 6/1/2009 (b) .......................................................... 5,000,000 5,199,551 Banning, CA, Wastewater, Certificate of Participation: 8%, 1/1/2019 (b) .............................................................. 960,000 1,204,079 8%, 1/1/2019 (b) .............................................................. 1,080,000 1,331,509 Big Bear Lake, CA, Series 1996, 6%, 4/1/2011 (b) ................................. 3,800,000 4,142,075 California Housing Finance Agency, 5.3%, 8/1/2014 (b) ............................ 1,660,000 1,661,526 California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue, Series A, 6.3%, 12/1/2006 (b) ................................................................. 8,095,000 8,870,986 Los Angeles County, CA, Capital Asset Leasing, 6%, 12/1/2006 (b) ................. 9,000,000 9,667,620 Los Angeles County, CA, Public Works Finance Authority, Lease Revenue, Multiple Projects IV, 4.75%, 12/1/2010 (b) .................................... 11,140,000 10,983,594 Madera County, CA, Certificate of Participation, Valley Childrens Hospital, 6.5%, 3/15/2010 (b) ........................................................... 2,840,000 3,199,317 Oakland, CA, Redevelopment Agency, Tax Allocations, 6%, 2/1/2007 (b) ............. 2,000,000 2,152,740 San Diego County, CA, Water Authority Revenue, Certificate of Participation: 5.63%, 4/25/2007 (b) .......................................................... 6,300,000 6,556,473 5.68%, 4/22/2009 (b) .......................................................... 4,500,000 4,700,925 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements 63
N-30D66th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 66th
AARP INSURED TAX FREE GENERAL BOND FUND ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ San Francisco, CA, Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Sales Tax Revenue Refunding, 6.75%, 7/1/2010 (b) ......................................................... 2,000,000 2,295,160 San Joaquin Hills, CA, Transportation Corridor Agency, Toll Road Revenue, Capital Appreciation, Revenue Refunding, Series 1997A, Zero Coupon, 1/15/2012 (b) ............................................................... 3,000,000 1,615,500 Colorado Mesa County, CO, Residual Revenue, Single Family Housing, Series 1992, Zero Coupon, ETM, 12/1/2011 (b)** ........................................... 6,435,000 3,436,419 Connecticut Connecticut Resource Recovery Authority, Series 1996, 6.25%, 11/15/2005 (b) .............................................................. 2,000,000 2,129,140 Connecticut State Health Facility Authority, Series 1992B, 6.15%, 11/15/2004 ... 5,000,000 5,138,250 District Of Columbia District of Columbia, General Obligation: 6.5%, 6/1/2010 (b) .......................................................... 110,000 121,447 Prerefunded 6/1/02 at 102, Series B, 6.125%, 6/1/2003 (b)*** ................ 95,000 99,362 Series A, 5.875%, ETM, 6/1/2005 (b)** ....................................... 2,335,000 2,431,155 Series B, 5.4%, 6/1/2006 (b) ................................................ 18,905,000 19,190,466 Series B, 5.5%, 6/1/2007 (b) ................................................ 25,000,000 25,517,000 Series B, 5.5%, 6/1/2008 (b) ................................................ 21,300,000 21,747,513 Series B, 5.5%, 6/1/2009 (b) ................................................ 16,150,000 16,463,149 Series B, 5.5%, 6/1/2009 (b) ................................................ 2,840,000 2,895,068 Series B, 5.5%, 6/1/2012 (b) ................................................ 1,050,000 1,062,926 Series B, Zero Coupon, 6/1/2000 (b) ......................................... 3,500,000 3,475,395 Series B3, 5.4%, 6/1/2006 (b) ............................................... 10,000,000 10,151,000 District of Columbia, General Obligation, Unrefunded Balance: 6.5%, 6/1/2010 (b) .......................................................... 2,160,000 2,359,735 Series A, 5.875%, 6/1/2005 (b) .............................................. 2,415,000 2,503,317 Series B, 6.125%, 6/1/2003 (b) .............................................. 3,905,000 4,039,957 Washington D.C. Convention Center Authority, Dedicated Tax Revenue, 5.25%, 10/1/2012 ................................................................... 4,000,000 3,985,520 Georgia Cobb County, GA, Kennestone Hospital Authority, Series A, 5.625%, 4/1/2011 (b) ................................................................ 2,305,000 2,373,620 Macon-Bibb County, GA, Hospital Authority, Medical Center of Central Georgia, Series C, 5.25%, 8/1/2011 (b) ............................................... 3,000,000 2,992,170 Municipal Electric Authority Power Revenue, Series Y, 6.4%, 1/1/2013 (b) ....... 3,500,000 3,872,400 State of Georgia, General Obligation, Series C, 5.5%, 9/1/2014 (b) ............. 2,000,000 2,058,200 Hawaii State of Hawaii, General Obligation, Series CT, 5.7%, 9/1/2013 (b) ............. 18,095,000 18,629,888 Illinois Central Lake County, IL, Joint Action Water Agency, Refunding Revenue, Zero Coupon, 5/1/2002 (b) ................................................... 2,245,000 2,025,910 Chicago, IL, General Obligation: 6.25%, 1/1/2011 (b) ......................................................... 3,000,000 3,261,780 Series A, 5.375%, 1/1/2013 (b) .............................................. 15,410,000 15,373,478 Series B, 5%, 1/1/2010 (b) .................................................. 5,200,000 5,097,456 Series B, 5%, 1/1/2011 (b) .................................................. 1,620,000 1,575,256
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements 64
N-30D67th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 67th
[Enlarge/Download Table] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Series B, 5.125%, 1/1/2015 (b) ............................................ 9,550,000 9,144,030 Chicago, IL, General Obligation Lease, Board of Education: Certificates of Participation, Series A, 6%, 1/1/2020 (b) ................. 36,625,000 38,090,733 Series 1996, 6.25%, 12/1/2011 (b) ......................................... 1,600,000 1,748,368 Series A, 6.25%, 1/1/2010 (b) ............................................. 11,550,000 12,522,395 Series A, 6.25%, 1/1/2015 (b) ............................................. 26,000,000 28,169,700 Series A, 6%, 1/1/2016 (b) ................................................ 11,025,000 11,647,472 Chicago, IL, O'Hare International Airport, Revenue Refunding, Series C, 5%, 1/1/2011 (b) .......................................................... 6,500,000 6,320,470 Chicago, IL, Public Building Commission, Building Revenue: Board of Education, Series A, Zero Coupon, ETM, 1/1/2006 (b)** ............ 2,430,000 1,807,871 Series A, 5.25%, 12/1/2007 (b) ............................................ 3,500,000 3,537,135 Series A, 5.25%, 12/1/2009 (b) ............................................ 10,420,000 10,489,918 Series A, 5.25%, 12/1/2011 (b) ............................................ 9,705,000 9,654,049 Chicago, IL, Wastewater Transmission Revenue: 5.5%, 1/1/2009 (b) ........................................................ 11,990,000 12,281,597 5.5%, 1/1/2010 (b) ........................................................ 7,220,000 7,383,389 Cook & Dupage Counties, IL, Housing Development Authority: Zero Coupon, 12/1/2007 (b) ................................................ 2,550,000 1,703,706 Zero Coupon, 12/1/2008 (b) ................................................ 2,625,000 1,658,344 Zero Coupon, 12/1/2009 (b) ................................................ 2,860,000 1,705,504 Cook County, IL, Community High School District #233, Capital Appreciation Series 1993B, Zero Coupon, 12/1/2008 (b) .................................. 1,700,000 1,057,791 Cook County, IL, General Obligation: Series C, 6%, 11/15/2007 (b) .............................................. 5,000,000 5,300,350 Zero Coupon, ETM, 11/1/2004 (b)** ......................................... 3,205,000 2,543,264 Decatur, IL, General Obligation: Series 1991, Zero Coupon, 10/1/2003 (b) ................................... 1,455,000 1,220,279 Series 1991, Zero Coupon, 10/1/2004 (b) ................................... 1,415,000 1,124,118 Decatur, IL, Public Building Commission, General Obligation, Certificate of Participation: 6.5%, 1/1/2003 (b) ..................................................... 1,725,000 1,796,846 6.5%, 1/1/2006 (b) ..................................................... 1,500,000 1,608,765 Hoffman Estates, IL, Tax Increment Revenue, Capital Appreciation, Junior Lien, Series 1991, Zero Coupon, 5/15/2007 ....................................... 17,460,000 11,863,721 Illinois, Dedicated Tax Revenue, Civic Center Project: 6.25%, 12/15/2011 (b) ..................................................... 3,000,000 3,254,130 6.25%, 12/15/2020 (b) ..................................................... 6,975,000 7,406,055 Series A, 6.5%, 12/15/2007 (b) ............................................ 4,765,000 5,207,430 Series A, 6.5%, 12/15/2008 (b) ............................................ 5,255,000 5,778,135 Illinois Educational Facilities Authority, Loyola University: Series A, Zero Coupon, ETM, 7/1/2004 (b)** ................................ 2,860,000 2,307,991 Zero Coupon, ETM, 7/1/2005** .............................................. 4,000,000 3,061,280 Illinois Health Facilities Authority: Brokaw-Mennonite Healthcare: 6%, 8/15/2006 (b) ...................................................... 1,380,000 1,442,169 6%, 8/15/2007 (b) ...................................................... 1,460,000 1,530,664 6%, 8/15/2008 (b) ...................................................... 1,550,000 1,628,895 6%, 8/15/2009 (b) ...................................................... 1,640,000 1,726,297 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements 65
N-30D68th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 68th
AARP INSURED TAX FREE GENERAL BOND FUND [Enlarge/Download Table] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Children's Memorial Hospital, 6.25%, 8/15/2013 (b) ........................... 3,400,000 3,665,710 Felician Healthcare Inc., Series A, 6.25%, 12/1/2015 (b) ..................... 17,000,000 18,292,850 Memorial Medical Center, Prerefunded 10/1/2000 at 102, 6.75%, 10/1/2011 (b)*** .......................................................... 2,135,000 2,204,131 SSM Healthcare System, 6.4%, 6/1/2008 (b) .................................... 1,350,000 1,451,912 Sherman Hospital, Prerefunded at 8/1/2001 at 102, 6.75%, 8/1/2011 (b)*** ..... 2,700,000 2,828,655 Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, Toll Highway Priority Revenue Bond, Series A, 5.5%, 1/1/2013 (b) ................................................. 3,665,000 3,728,588 Joliet, IL, Junior College Assistance Corp., Lease Revenue, North Campus Extension Center, 6.7%, 9/1/2012 (b) ......................................... 2,500,000 2,767,925 Kane County, IL,Series 1996A, 6.5%, 2/1/2010 (b) ................................ 1,775,000 1,937,874 Kane, Cook and Dupage Counties, IL, School District #46 Elgin: Series 1996B, Zero Coupon, 1/1/2011 (b) ...................................... 1,040,000 581,610 Series 1996B, Zero Coupon, 1/1/2012 (b) ...................................... 1,300,000 684,047 Series 1996B, Zero Coupon, 1/1/2013 (b) ...................................... 2,095,000 1,035,998 Kendall, Kane and Will Counties, IL, Community Unit School District #308, Oswego: Zero Coupon, 3/1/2002 (b) ................................................. 1,055,000 959,902 Zero Coupon, 3/1/2005 (b) ................................................. 1,540,000 1,194,763 Zero Coupon, 3/1/2006 (b) ................................................. 1,595,000 1,171,783 Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, IL, McCormick Place Expansion Project: Series 1994, Zero Coupon, 6/15/2013 (b) ...................................... 5,625,000 2,712,488 Zero Coupon, 12/15/2003 (b) .................................................. 3,200,000 2,656,192 Zero Coupon, 6/15/2004 (b) ................................................... 10,300,000 8,306,744 Northwest Suburban Municipal Joint Action Water Agency, IL, Supply System Revenue, 6.45%, 5/1/2007 (b) ................................................. 2,575,000 2,786,047 Rosemont, IL, Tax Increment: Series C, Zero Coupon, 12/1/2005 (b) ......................................... 4,455,000 3,324,989 Series C, Zero Coupon, 12/1/2007 (b) ......................................... 2,655,000 1,773,859 Skokie, IL, Park District, Series 1994B, Zero Coupon, 12/1/2011 (b) ............. 3,000,000 1,596,600 State University Retirement System, IL, Special Revenue, Zero Coupon, 10/1/2003 (b) ................................................................ 2,750,000 2,306,370 University of Illinois, Board of Trustees: Series 1991, Zero Coupon, 4/1/2003 (b) ....................................... 3,890,000 3,348,434 Series 1991, Zero Coupon, 4/1/2005 (b) ....................................... 3,830,000 2,962,965 Will County, IL, Community Unit School District #201-U, Crete-Monee, Capital Appreciation: Zero Coupon, 12/15/2000 (b) ............................................... 1,325,000 1,285,687 Zero Coupon, 12/15/2001 (b) ............................................... 1,730,000 1,595,181 Indiana Indiana Health Facilities Finance Authority: Charity Obligation Group, Series D, 5.75%, 11/15/2012 (b) .................... 4,660,000 4,698,958 Community Hospitals Project, 6.4%, 5/1/2012 (b) .............................. 5,000,000 5,199,550 Series 1990A, 6%, 7/1/2003 (b) ............................................... 1,570,000 1,620,209 Series 1990A, 6%, 7/1/2004 (b) ............................................... 1,665,000 1,727,254 Series 1990A, 6%, 7/1/2005 (b) ............................................... 1,765,000 1,840,489 Series 1990A, 6%, 7/1/2006 (b) ............................................... 1,875,000 1,963,144 Series 1990A, 6%, 7/1/2007 (b) ............................................... 1,985,000 2,085,818 Series 1990A, 6%, 7/1/2008 (b) ............................................... 1,085,000 1,143,275 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 66
N-30D69th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 69th
[Enlarge/Download Table] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Series 1990A, 6%, 7/1/2009 (b) ............................................. 1,125,000 1,187,786 Series 1990A, 6%, 7/1/2010 (b) ............................................. 1,185,000 1,246,004 Series 1990A, 6%, 7/1/2011 (b) ............................................. 1,260,000 1,328,431 Series 1990A, 6%, 7/1/2012 (b) ............................................. 1,345,000 1,418,975 Series 1990A, 6%, 7/1/2013 (b) ............................................. 1,420,000 1,492,874 Series 1990A, 6%, 7/1/2014 (b) ............................................. 1,505,000 1,576,999 Series 1990A, 6%, 7/1/2015 (b) ............................................. 1,600,000 1,671,584 Series 1990A, 6%, 7/1/2016 (b) ............................................. 1,700,000 1,775,463 Series 1990A, 6%, 7/1/2017 (b) ............................................. 1,800,000 1,880,838 Series 1990A, 6%, 7/1/2018 (b) ............................................. 1,910,000 1,991,977 Tax Exempt Custodian Receipts Refund, Series 1997A, 6%, 7/1/2002 (b) ....... 1,480,000 1,517,962 Indiana University, Revenue Refunding: Series H, Zero Coupon, 8/1/2006 (b) ........................................ 8,500,000 6,110,480 Student Fee Revenue, Series H, Zero Coupon, 8/1/2008 (b) ................... 10,000,000 6,430,100 Merrillville, IN, Multiple School Building Corp., First Mortgage, Zero Coupon, 1/15/2011 (b) .............................................................. 4,000,000 2,232,280 Iowa Polk County, IA, Mercy Hospital, Prerefunded 11/1/2001 at 101, 6.75%, 11/1/2005 (b)*** ........................................................... 5,000,000 5,213,550 Kansas Kansas City, KS, Utility System Revenue: Zero Coupon, 9/1/2004 (b) .................................................. 2,640,000 2,113,505 Zero Coupon, 9/1/2005 (b) .................................................. 3,950,000 2,999,038 Zero Coupon, 9/1/2006 (b) .................................................. 1,375,000 989,106 Zero Coupon, ETM, 9/1/2004 (b)** ........................................... 3,575,000 2,865,756 Zero Coupon, ETM, 9/1/2005 (b)** ........................................... 5,300,000 4,030,385 Zero Coupon, ETM, 9/1/2006 (b)** ........................................... 1,875,000 1,351,313 Louisiana Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, Prerefunded 2/15/2008 at 100, 4.75%, 5/1/2016*** ................................................................ 5,765,000 5,657,137 New Orleans, LA, General Obligation: Zero Coupon, 9/1/2007 (b) .................................................. 10,000,000 6,804,000 Zero Coupon, ETM, 7/15/2006** .............................................. 4,850,000 3,297,855 Orleans, LA, Levee District, Levee Improvement Bonds, Series 1986, 5.95%, 11/1/2014 (b) .............................................................. 1,765,000 1,829,599 Maryland Baltimore, MD, Revenue Exchanged, Auto Parking Revenue, Series 1996A, 5.9%, 7/1/2012 (b) ......................................................... 3,100,000 3,310,768 Massachusetts Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Boston Medical Center, Series A, 5.25%, 7/1/2012 (b) .............................................. 2,920,000 2,857,833 Michigan Detroit, MI, General Obligation: 6%, 4/1/2016 (b) ........................................................... 2,865,000 2,981,978 City School District, Series 1998C, 5.25%, 5/1/2014 ........................ 1,000,000 987,230 Southgate, MI, Community School District, General Obligation, 5%, 5/1/2025 (b). 5,500,000 4,868,985 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 67
N-30D70th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 70th
AARP INSURED TAX FREE GENERAL BOND FUND [Enlarge/Download Table] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Missouri Missouri Health & Educational Facilities Authority, SSM Healthcare: 1992 Series AA, 6.35%, 6/1/2008 (b) ................................... 8,125,000 8,767,606 1992 Series AA, 6.4%, 6/1/2009 (b) .................................... 8,640,000 9,395,482 Nevada Clark County, NV, School District: General Obligation, Series B, Zero Coupon, 3/1/2005 (b) ............... 8,070,000 6,266,839 Series 1991B, Zero Coupon, 3/1/2009 (b) ............................... 4,350,000 2,704,874 New Jersey New Jersey Highway Authority, 6.5%, ETM, 1/1/2011 (b)** .................. 4,111,000 4,391,411 New Jersey Turnpike Authority, Series 1991A, 6.3%, 1/1/2001 (b) .......... 1,250,000 1,269,600 New York New York City, NY, General Obligation: Prerefunded 8/1/2002 at 101.50, Series C, 6.4%, 8/1/2004 (b)*** ....... 275,000 289,097 Prerefunded 8/1/2002 at 101.50, Series C, 6.4%, 8/1/2005 (b)*** ....... 10,235,000 10,759,646 Series A, 8%, ETM, 11/1/2001 (b)** .................................... 740,000 742,353 Series A, 3%, 8/15/2002 (b) ........................................... 9,000,000 8,549,640 Series C, 6.4%, 8/1/2004 (b) .......................................... 225,000 235,301 Series C, 6.4%, 8/1/2005 (b) .......................................... 195,000 203,621 Series D, 8%, 8/1/2005 (b) ............................................ 5,000 5,085 Series E, 7%, ETM, 12/1/2007 (b)** .................................... 1,385,000 1,391,537 Unrefunded Balance, Series D, 1997, 6%, 8/1/2006 (b) .................. 20,000 20,110 Unrefunded Balance, Series D, 1998, 6%, 8/1/2008 (b) .................. 55,000 55,304 New York State Dormitory Authority Revenue: City University, Series C, 7.5%, 7/1/2010 (b) ......................... 5,750,000 6,623,253 City University, Series D, 7%, 7/1/2009 (b) ........................... 4,000,000 4,397,480 City University System, Series I, 5.125%, 7/1/2027 (b) ................ 19,100,000 17,020,965 College and University Pooled Capital Program, 7.8%, 12/1/2005 (b) .... 1,605,000 1,637,341 Mental Health Services, Series C, 5.25%, 8/15/2024 (b) ................ 10,250,000 9,430,923 New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Pollution Control Revenue, Electric and Gas, 5.9%, 12/1/2006 (b) ................ 5,300,000 5,570,247 New York State Urban Development Authority, Correctional Facilities, 6.5%, 1/1/2011 (b) .................................................... 4,500,000 5,004,135 New York, NY, Series C, 5.375%, 11/15/2017 (b) ........................... 5,000,000 4,896,600 Suffolk County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Southwest Sewer System, 6%, 2/1/2007 (b) ...................................................... 8,000,000 8,434,000 Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, NY, General Purpose Revenue: Series A, 5.125%, 1/1/2018 (b) ........................................ 6,500,000 6,078,605 Series Y, 5.5%, 1/1/2017 (b) .......................................... 5,050,000 5,064,746 North Carolina North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency: 5.5%, 1/1/2007 (b) .................................................... 2,000,000 2,041,600 Power System Revenue, Series B, 6%, 1/1/2018 (b) ...................... 8,775,000 9,216,295 North Carolina Municipal Power Agency No. 1, Catawba Electric Revenue: 5.25%, 1/1/2008 (b) ................................................... 2,500,000 2,515,600 6%, 1/1/2011 (b) ...................................................... 8,235,000 8,708,924 Series 1992, 7.25%, 1/1/2007 (b) ...................................... 5,000,000 5,575,150 Series 1997, 6%, 1/1/2008 (b) ......................................... 2,585,000 2,723,711 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 68
N-30D71st Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 71st
[Enlarge/Download Table] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ North Dakota Bismarck, ND, Hospital Revenue, St. Alexius Medical Center, Series 1991, Zero Coupon, ETM, 5/1/2002 (b)** ..................................... 2,850,000 2,572,409 Ohio Cleveland, OH, Water Works Revenue, Series 1993G, 5.5%, 1/1/2013 (b) ......................................................... 10,000,000 10,248,100 Oklahoma Tulsa, OK, Industrial Development Authority, Hospital Revenue, St. John's Medical Center: Zero Coupon, 12/1/2002 (b) ........................................ 3,930,000 3,450,461 Zero Coupon, 12/1/2004 (b) ........................................ 5,430,000 4,288,831 Zero Coupon, 12/1/2006 (b) ........................................ 6,430,000 4,560,542 Pennsylvania Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Industrial Development Authority, Economic Development Revenue: 5.8%, 1/1/2008 (b) ................................................ 4,250,000 4,446,435 5.8%, 7/1/2008 (b) ................................................ 4,875,000 5,112,071 Commonwealth of Philadelphia, PA, Water & Wastewater Refunding Revenue, 5.5%, 6/15/2007 (b) .................................................. 5,000,000 5,131,050 Philadelphia, PA, Water and Wastewater Revenue, 5.25%, 12/15/2012 (b) ... 5,500,000 5,509,680 Westmoreland County, PA, Industrial Development Revenue, Westmoreland Health System, 5.375%, 7/1/2011 (b) .................................. 7,300,000 7,345,333 Rhode Island Rhode Island Clean Water Protection Agency, Pollution Control Revenue, Revolving Fund, Series A, 5.4%, 10/1/2015 (b) ........................ 2,000,000 1,977,260 Rhode Island Convention Center Authority, Refunding Revenue: Series 1993 B, 5%, 5/15/2010 (b) ..................................... 5,000,000 4,929,500 Series 1993 B, 5.25%, 5/15/2015 (b) .................................. 22,000,000 21,505,000 Rhode Island Depositors Economic Protection Corp., Special Obligation: Series B, 5.8%, ETM, 8/1/2010 (b)** .................................. 6,200,000 6,539,636 Series B, 5.8%, ETM, 8/1/2011 (b)** .................................. 4,525,000 4,770,798 Series B, 5.8%, ETM, 8/1/2012 (b)** .................................. 2,500,000 2,632,775 Series B, 5.8%, ETM, 8/1/2013 (b)** .................................. 7,340,000 7,715,808 South Carolina Piedmont, SC, Municipal Power Agency, Electric Revenue: Series 1993, 5.5%, ETM, 1/1/2008 (b)** ............................... 840,000 866,099 Series 1993, 5.5%, ETM, 1/1/2012 (b)** ............................... 2,190,000 2,247,028 Series 1993, 5.5%, 1/1/2012 (b) ...................................... 2,810,000 2,853,527 Series 1991A, 6.5%, ETM, 1/1/2016 (b)** .............................. 430,000 477,760 Tennessee Knox County, TN, Health & Educational Hospital Facilities Board, Hospital Facilities Revenue, Fort Sanders Alliance: 7.25%, 1/1/2009 (b) ............................................... 3,750,000 4,272,638 5.75%, 1/1/2011 (b) ............................................... 15,405,000 15,902,427 5.75%, 1/1/2012 (b) ............................................... 17,880,000 18,448,942 6.25%, 1/1/2013 (b) ............................................... 4,000,000 4,302,360 5.75%, 1/1/2014 (b) ............................................... 2,000,000 2,034,060 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 69
N-30D72nd Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 72nd
AARP INSURED TAX FREE GENERAL BOND FUND [Enlarge/Download Table] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Texas Austin, TX, Combined Utility System Revenue, Zero Coupon, 11/15/2009 (b) ...... 5,020,000 3,009,138 Austin, TX, Utility Systems Revenue Refunding, Series A, Zero Coupon, 11/15/2008 (b) ............................................................. 3,460,000 2,196,545 Bexar County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Baptist Health System: Series 1997, 6%, 11/15/2012 (b) ............................................ 3,000,000 3,171,419 Series 1997A, 6%, 11/15/2011 (b) ........................................... 2,000,000 2,113,059 Brownsville, TX, Utility System Revenue, 6.25%, 9/1/2010 (b) .................. 4,085,000 4,426,423 Cedar Hill, TX, Zero Coupon: Series 1996, 8/15/2009 ..................................................... 1,500,000 900,434 Series 1996, 8/15/2010 ..................................................... 3,130,000 1,772,174 Dallas, TX, Civic Center, 5%, 8/15/2028 (b) ................................... 10,000,000 8,719,900 Dallas, TX, Housing Finance Corp., Single Family Mortgage Revenue, Zero Coupon, 10/1/2016 (b) ................................................. 5,990,000 1,109,648 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX, Airport Revenue: 7.75%, 11/1/2003 (b) ....................................................... 1,000,000 1,091,710 7.8%, 11/1/2005 (b) ........................................................ 2,000,000 2,236,780 7.8%, 11/1/2006 (b) ........................................................ 2,025,000 2,262,674 7.375%, 11/1/2008 (b) ...................................................... 4,500,000 4,967,145 7.375%, 11/1/2010 (b) ...................................................... 3,500,000 3,849,685 Fort Worth, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp., Texas Christian University Project, 5%, 3/15/2020 ..................................................... 3,500,000 3,156,090 Harris County, TX, General Obligation: Capital Appreciation Bond, Zero Coupon, 10/1/2006 (b) ...................... 9,035,000 6,438,883 Flood Control District, Zero Coupon, 10/1/2000 (b) ......................... 1,000,000 978,900 Toll Road Authority, Subordinate Lien: Series A, Zero Coupon, 8/15/2005 (b) .................................... 4,025,000 3,054,895 Toll Road Revenue, Series A, Zero Coupon, 8/15/2006 (b) ................. 4,010,000 2,882,228 Unlimited Tax, Series A, Zero Coupon, 8/15/2004 (b) ..................... 2,050,000 1,641,353 Harris County, TX, Health Facilities Development, Texas Medical Center Project: 6.25%, 5/15/2008 (b) ....................................................... 2,785,000 2,972,737 6.25%, 5/15/2009 (b) ....................................................... 2,965,000 3,175,307 Houston, TX, Water & Sewer System Authority: Series C, Zero Coupon, 12/1/2006 (b) ....................................... 14,575,000 10,317,351 Series C, Zero Coupon, 12/1/2008 (b) ....................................... 19,000,000 12,033,650 Series C, Zero Coupon, 12/1/2009 (b) ....................................... 14,750,000 8,820,795 Series 1991C, Zero Coupon, 12/1/2012 (b) ................................... 3,350,000 1,676,608 Zero Coupon, 12/1/2010 (b) ................................................. 5,000,000 2,823,450 Hurst Euless Bedford, TX, Independent School District, Capital Appreciation Refunding, Series 1994, Zero Coupon, 8/15/2009 ............................. 4,925,000 2,991,741 Laredo TX, Independent School District, 6%, 8/1/2011 .......................... 2,465,000 2,612,900 Lubbock, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Methodist Hospital: Series B, 5.5%, ETM, 12/1/2006 (b)** ....................................... 3,945,000 4,059,878 Series B, 5.6%, ETM, 12/1/2007 (b)** ....................................... 2,415,000 2,503,051 Series B, 5.625%, ETM, 12/1/2008 (b)** ..................................... 4,400,000 4,569,224 Series B, 5.625%, ETM, 12/1/2009 (b)** ..................................... 4,640,000 4,820,125 Mesquite, TX, Independent School District, General Obligation, 5.125%, 8/15/2019 (b) .............................................................. 2,640,000 2,443,320 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 70
N-30D73rd Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 73rd
[Enlarge/Download Table] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Montgomery County, TX, Capital Appreciation: Zero Coupon, ETM, 9/1/2003 (b)** ........................................ 800,000 675,112 Zero Coupon, ETM, 9/1/2004** ............................................ 795,000 636,453 Zero Coupon, ETM, 9/1/2005** ............................................ 685,000 520,086 Unrefunded Balance: Zero Coupon, 9/1/2003 (b) ............................................... 2,675,000 2,255,159 Zero Coupon, 9/1/2004 (b) ............................................... 2,680,000 2,140,918 Zero Coupon, 9/1/2005 (b) ............................................... 2,790,000 2,112,728 Northeast, TX, Hospital Authority, Revenue Refunding, Northeast Medical Center, Series 1997, 6%, 5/15/2010 (b) ............................................. 2,180,000 2,292,968 Northwest Texas Independent School District, Capital Appreciation Bonds, Series 1991, Zero Coupon, 8/15/2010 (b) .................................... 3,690,000 2,116,842 San Antonio, TX, Electric & Gas, Revenue Refunding: Series A, Zero Coupon, 2/1/2005 (b) ........................................ 2,500,000 1,950,675 Series A, Zero Coupon, 2/1/2006 (b) ........................................ 17,900,000 13,267,838 Series B, Zero Coupon, ETM, 2/1/2005 (b)** ................................. 8,000,000 6,242,160 Series B, Zero Coupon, ETM, 2/1/2009 (b)** ................................. 4,400,000 2,757,612 San Antonio, TX, Electric & Gas, Revenue, Series A, 5.25%, 2/1/2012 ........... 3,000,000 2,986,710 San Antonio, TX, Hotel Revenue, Series 1996, 6%, 8/15/2006 (b) ................ 2,000,000 2,107,860 State of Texas, General Obligation, Capital Appreciation Bond: Series C, Zero Coupon, ETM, 4/1/2005 (b)** ................................. 7,540,000 5,847,345 Series C, Zero Coupon, 4/1/2005 (b) ........................................ 850,000 659,184 Super Collider, Series C, Zero Coupon, 4/1/2006 (b) ........................ 7,385,000 5,430,486 Tarrant County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Hospital Refunding Revenue, Fort Worth Osteopathic Hospital: 6%, 5/15/2011 (b) ....................................................... 4,615,000 4,846,350 6%, 5/15/2021 (b) ....................................................... 6,235,000 6,400,602 Texas Municipal Power Agency: 6.1%, 9/1/2007 (b) ......................................................... 9,250,000 9,844,128 6.1%, ETM, 9/1/2009 (b)** .................................................. 4,435,000 4,773,479 Texas Public Finance Authority, Building Authority: Series B, 6.25%, 2/1/2008 (b) .............................................. 5,190,000 5,584,907 Zero Coupon, 2/1/2006 (b) .................................................. 13,915,000 10,284,855 Trinity River, TX, Wastewater Systems Revenue, Series B, 5.25%, 8/1/2012 ...... 5,540,000 5,524,654 Utah Associated Municipal Power System, UT, Hunter Project, Refunding Revenue: Zero Coupon, 7/1/2000 (b) .................................................. 2,755,000 2,725,825 Zero Coupon, 7/1/2002 (b) .................................................. 5,200,000 4,657,224 Zero Coupon, 7/1/2004 (b) .................................................. 5,895,000 4,749,307 Zero Coupon, 7/1/2005 (b) .................................................. 5,900,000 4,506,125 Zero Coupon, 7/1/2006 (b) .................................................. 5,895,000 4,264,030 Zero Coupon, 7/1/2007 (b) .................................................. 3,750,000 2,566,425 Intermountain Power Agency, UT, Power Supply Revenue: 5%, 7/1/2012 (b) ........................................................... 1,000,000 965,280 Series 1993, 5.46%, 7/1/2011 (b) ........................................... 7,000,000 7,027,790 Series A, Zero Coupon, 7/1/2003 (b) ........................................ 1,000,000 849,290 Series A, Zero Coupon, 7/1/2004 (b) ........................................ 1,730,000 1,392,045 Series A, 6.5%, 7/1/2008 (b) ............................................... 4,000,000 4,364,440 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 71
N-30D74th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 74th
AARP INSURED TAX FREE GENERAL BOND FUND [Enlarge/Download Table] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Series A, Zero Coupon, 7/1/2002 (b) ........................................ 1,655,000 1,481,275 Series B, Zero Coupon, 7/1/2002 (b) ........................................ 8,230,000 7,366,097 Provo, UT, Electric System Revenue, 10.375%, ETM, 9/15/2015 (b)** ............. 1,800,000 2,459,790 Virginia Roanoke, VA, Industrial Development Authority, Roanoke Memorial Hospital, Series B, 6.125%, 7/1/2017 (b) ............................................. 5,500,000 5,872,955 Southeastern Public Service Authority, VA, Refunding Revenue, Series A, 5.25%, 7/1/2010 (b) .............................................. 7,380,000 7,425,904 Winchester County, VA, Industrial Development Authority, Hospital Revenue, 6%, 1/1/2015 (b) ........................................................... 5,700,000 5,705,187 Washington Clark County, WA, Public Utility District, Series 1995, 6%, 1/1/2008 (b) ...... 2,200,000 2,326,698 King & Snohomish Counties, WA, General Obligation, School District #417, 5.6%, 12/1/2010 (b) ........................................................ 1,650,000 1,712,964 King County, WA, Public Hospital District #1, Valley Medical Center, Series 1992, 5.5%, 9/1/2017 (b) ............................................ 3,500,000 3,415,615 Snohomish County, WA: School District #6, 6.5%, 12/1/2007 (b) .................................... 3,325,000 3,619,229 School District #015, General Obligation, Series 1998, 5.75%, 12/1/2011 (b) 3,485,000 3,647,680 State of Washington, General Obligation, Series AT-5, Zero Coupon, 8/1/2010 (b) 2,625,000 1,509,034 Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, Empire Health Services-- Spokane: 5.65%, 11/1/2005 (b) ....................................................... 2,155,000 2,213,961 5.7%, 11/1/2006 (b) ........................................................ 3,440,000 3,548,222 5.75%, 11/1/2007 (b) ....................................................... 7,350,000 7,609,602 5.8%, 11/1/2009 (b) ........................................................ 4,595,000 4,779,673 5.8%, 11/1/2010 (b) ........................................................ 2,100,000 2,185,848 Washington Public Power Supply System, Revenue Refunding Nuclear Project #1: Series A, Prerefunded 7/1/2000 at 102, 7%, 7/1/2011 (b)*** .............. 3,830,000 3,932,529 Series B, 7.25%, 7/1/2012 (b) ........................................... 10,895,000 11,193,305 Nuclear Project #2: Series 1992A, Zero Coupon, 7/1/2011 (b) ................................. 4,200,000 2,293,704 Series A, 5.7%, 7/1/2008 (b) ............................................ 5,000,000 5,168,900 Series A, Prerefunded 7/1/2000 at 102, 7.25%, 7/1/2003 (b)*** ........... 2,000,000 2,054,760 Series C, 7%, 7/1/2001 (b) .............................................. 10,000,000 10,277,500 Series C, Prerefunded 7/1/2000 at 102, 7.375%, 7/1/2011 (b)*** .......... 1,370,000 1,428,061 Nuclear Project #3: Series 1989A, Zero Coupon, 7/1/2010 (b) ................................. 5,860,000 3,373,661 Series A, Zero Coupon, 7/1/2004 (b) ..................................... 3,625,000 2,916,856 Series A, Zero Coupon, 7/1/2005 (b) ..................................... 4,125,000 3,145,643 Series C, 7.5%, 7/1/2008 (b) ............................................ 2,000,000 2,293,620 Wisconsin Kenosha, WI, General Obligation, Series C, Zero Coupon, 6/1/2004 (b) .......... 3,475,000 2,811,518 Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority: 6.1%, 8/15/2009 (b) ........................................................ 2,000,000 2,117,140 Aurora Medical: 5.75%, 11/15/2006 (b) ................................................... 2,000,000 2,064,220 5.75%, 11/15/2007 (b) ................................................... 1,500,000 1,550,220 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 72
N-30D75th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 75th
[Enlarge/Download Table] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6%, 11/15/2008 (b) ................................................ 4,085,000 4,295,010 6%, 11/15/2009 (b) ................................................ 4,330,000 4,559,187 Felician Healthcare Inc., Series B, 6.25%, 1/1/2022 (b) .............. 5,285,000 5,616,845 Hospital Sisters Services Inc.-- Obligated Group, 5.375%, 6/1/2018 (b) 4,800,000 4,546,560 SSM Healthcare: Series 1992 AA, 6.4%, 6/1/2008 (b) ................................ 2,335,000 2,509,681 Series 1992 AA, 6.45%, 6/1/2009 (b) ............................... 2,485,000 2,691,280 Series 1992 AA, 6.45%, 6/1/2010 (b) ............................... 2,650,000 2,880,391 Series 1992 AA, 6.5%, 6/1/2011 (b) ................................ 2,820,000 3,109,727 Series 1992 AA, 6.5%, 6/1/2012 (b) ................................ 3,000,000 3,319,530 St. Luke's Medical Center, Prerefunded 8/15/2001 at 102, 7.1%, 8/15/2011 (b)*** .................................................. 2,000,000 2,106,100 Villa St. Francis Inc., Series C, 6.25%, 1/1/2022 (b) ................ 9,230,000 9,809,553 Wheaton Franciscan Services, 6.1%, 8/15/2008 (b) ..................... 4,580,000 4,838,129 -------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Long-Term Municipal Investments (Cost $1,382,211,098) ............. 1,456,879,991 -------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Investment Portfolio-- 100% (Cost $1,391,866,098) (a) ............. 1,466,534,991 -------------- -------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Floating rate demand notes are securities whose interest rates vary with a designated market index or market rate, such as the coupon-equivalent of the U.S. Treasury bill rate. Variable rate demand notes are securities whose interest rates are reset periodically at levels that are generally comparable to tax-exempt commercial paper. These securities are payable on demand within seven calendar days and normally incorporate an irrevocable letter of credit or line of credit from a major bank. These notes are carried, for purposes of calculating average weighted maturity, at the longer of the period remaining until the next rate change or to the extent of the demand period. These securities are shown at their current rate as of March 31, 2000. ** ETM: Bonds bearing the description ETM (escrowed to maturity) are collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities which are held in escrow by a trustee and used to pay principal and interest on bonds so designated. *** Prerefunded: Bonds which are prerefunded are collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities which are held in escrow and are used to pay principal and interest on tax-exempt issues and to retire the bonds in full at the earliest refunding date. (a) At March 31, 2000, the net unrealized appreciation on investments based on cost for federal income tax purposes of was as follows: $1,392,162,757 Aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all investments in which there is an excess of value over tax cost $ 75,740,096 Aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all investments in which there is an excess of tax cost over value (1,367,862) ------------ Net unrealized appreciation $ 74,372,234 ============ (b) (Unaudited) Bond is insured by one of these companies: AMBAC, Capital Guaranty, FGIC, FSA, or MBIA/BIG. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Purchases and sales of investment securities (excluding short-term investments) for the six months ended March 31, 2000 aggregated $67,444,767 and $175,516,044, respectively. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From November 1, 1998 through September 30, 1999, the Fund incurred approximately $700,000 of net realized capital losses. As permitted by tax regulations, the Fund intends to elect to defer these losses and treat them as arising in the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000. The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 73
N-30D76th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 76th
AARP BOND FUND FOR INCOME [Enlarge/Download Table] LIST OF INVESTMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 (UNAUDITED) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS 4.8% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State Street Bank and Trust Company, 6.05%, to be repurchased at $8,799,434 on 4/3/2000** (Cost $8,795,000) ........................................ 8,795,000 8,795,000 ---------- U.S. GOVERNMENT & AGENCIES 21.5% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- U.S. Treasury Note, 5.875%, 11/15/2004 .................................... 4,750,000 4,663,883 U.S. Treasury Note, Inflationary Index, 3.927%, 1/15/2009 ................. 4,000,000 4,069,962 U.S. Treasury Bond, 10.75%, 8/15/2005 ..................................... 9,000,000 10,735,290 U.S. Treasury Bond Inflationary Index, 3.684%, 4/15/2028 .................. 3,500,000 3,466,668 U.S. Treasury Bond, 5.25%, 2/15/2029 ...................................... 1,650,000 1,479,588 U.S. Treasury Bond, 6.125%, 8/15/2029 ..................................... 8,800,000 8,969,136 U.S. Treasury Bond, 6.25%, 5/15/2030 ...................................... 5,950,000 6,290,281 ----------- Total U.S. Government & Agencies (Cost $40,841,956) ....................... 39,674,808 ----------- GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION* 3.4% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Government National Mortgage Association 7.5% with various maturities to 4/15/2027 ........................................ 779,217 772,399 Government National Mortgage Association 7% with various maturities to 4/15/2029 ........................................ 5,706,293 5,530,647 ---------- Total Government National Mortgage Association (Cost $6,559,045) .......... 6,303,046 ---------- U.S. GOVERNMENT BACKED MORTGAGES* 9.1% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 5.75%, 7/15/2003 ........................ 3,000,000 2,890,320 Federal National Mortgage Association 6.5% with various maturities to 3/1/2028 ............................................................ 9,047,415 8,498,912 Federal National Mortgage Association 7.25% with various maturities to 1/15/2010 ........................................................... 2,800,000 2,818,816 Federal National Mortgage Association 8% with various maturities to 12/1/2012 ........................................................... 2,505,257 2,534,036 ---------- Total U.S. Government Backed Mortgages (Cost $17,563,663) ................. 16,742,084 ---------- COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS* 1.5% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., Series 1997Q512-A7, 7.25%, 11/25/2027 (Cost $2,966,919) ...................................................... 2,917,683 2,837,447 ---------- FOREIGN BONDS -- U.S. $ DENOMINATED 2.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PacifiCorp Australia LLC, 6.15%, 1/15/2008 ................................ 2,000,000 1,868,780 ---------- Petroleum Geo-Services, 6.625%, 3/30/2008 ................................. 2,000,000 1,836,740 ---------- Total Foreign Bonds-- U.S.$ Denominated (Cost $3,936,200) ................. 3,705,520 ---------- The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 74
N-30D77th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 77th
[Enlarge/Download Table] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ASSET BACKED 3.4% ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Automobile Receivables 1.1% First Security Auto Owner Trust, Series 1999-2 A3, 6%, 10/15/2003 2,000,000 1,979,688 ---------- Credit Card Receivables 1.8% Citibank Credit Card Master Trust I, 6%, 4/10/2003 .............. 1,500,000 1,481,250 ---------- MBNA Master Credit Card Trust, 5.8%, 12/15/2005 ................. 2,000,000 1,928,120 ---------- 3,409,370 ---------- Home Equity Loans 0.3% First Plus Residential Trust Series 1998A, 8.5%, 5/15/2023 ...... 1,368,056 547,222 ---------- Manufactured Housing Receivables 0.2% Green Tree Financial Corp., Series 1997-2 B2, 8.05%, 6/15/2028 .. 492,920 383,399 ---------- Total Asset Backed (Cost $7,347,861) ............................ 6,319,679 ---------- CORPORATE BONDS 54.3% ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Consumer Discretionary 3.0% Federated Department Stores, Inc., 8.5%, 6/15/2003 .............. 1,000,000 1,024,440 Harrah's Operating Co., Inc., 7.875%, 12/15/2005 ................ 2,000,000 1,845,000 Park Place Entertainment, Inc., 9.375%, 2/15/2007 ............... 1,350,000 1,319,625 Tricon Global Restaurants Inc., 7.65%, 5/15/2008 ................ 1,500,000 1,416,000 ---------- 5,605,065 ---------- Consumer Staples 3.6% Aurora Foods, Inc., 8.75%, 7/1/2008 ............................. 1,000,000 380,000 Bass America Inc., 6.625%, 3/1/2003 ............................. 1,500,000 1,468,770 Safeway Inc., 7.25%, 9/15/2004 .................................. 1,900,000 1,888,334 The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc., 7.7%, 1/15/2004 ..... 3,000,000 2,888,400 ---------- 6,625,504 ---------- Communications 11.0% Call-Net Enterprises Inc., 8%, 8/15/2008 ........................ 1,800,000 1,260,000 Intermedia Communications, Inc., 8.875%, 11/1/2007 .............. 2,000,000 1,870,000 Level 3 Communications, Inc., 9.125%, 5/1/2008 .................. 2,000,000 1,725,000 McLeodUSA, Inc., 8.125%, 2/15/2009 .............................. 1,500,000 1,323,750 McLeodUSA, Inc., Exchange Shares, 8.375%, 3/15/2008 ............. 500,000 445,000 Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc., 10%, 12/15/2009 ................. 925,000 888,000 Nextel Communications, Inc., 9.375%, 11/15/2009 ................. 1,200,000 1,107,000 Qwest Communications International, 7.5%, 11/1/2008 ............. 3,000,000 2,917,500 Sprint Capital Corp., 6.375%, 5/1/2009 .......................... 4,150,000 3,807,625 Vodafone Airtouch PLC, 6.25%, 2/15/2010 ......................... 2,050,000 2,064,145 WorldCom, Inc., 6.4%, 8/15/2005 ................................. 3,000,000 2,879,850 ---------- 20,287,870 ---------- Financial 13.1% Bell Atlantic Financial Services, 7.6%, 3/15/2007 ............... 1,400,000 1,409,660 Boeing Capital Corp., 6.75%, 12/23/2003 ......................... 1,500,000 1,482,525 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 75
N-30D78th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 78th
AARP BOND FUND FOR INCOME -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Capital One Bank, 6.57%, 1/27/2003 ................... 2,500,000 2,431,250 Chase Manhattan Corp., 5.75%, 4/15/2004 .............. 2,000,000 1,886,320 Firststar Bank, 7.125%, 12/1/2009 .................... 1,100,000 1,045,000 Fleet Boston Corp, 6.375%, 4/15/2008 ................. 1,050,000 963,218 Ford Motor Credit Co., 7.375%, 10/28/2009 ............ 1,300,000 1,274,910 GS Escrow Corp., 7%, 8/1/2003 ........................ 2,000,000 1,841,900 General Electric Capital Corp., 7%, 2/3/2003 ......... 2,100,000 2,100,714 General Motors Acceptance Corp., 7.75%, 1/19/2010 .... 1,150,000 1,160,615 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 7.8%, 1/28/2010 ........... 1,350,000 1,339,875 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 6%, 2/17/2009 ............. 500,000 446,235 National Westminster Bank PLC, 7.375%, 10/1/2009 ..... 1,850,000 1,804,213 PNC Funding Corp., 7%, 9/1/2004 ...................... 1,200,000 1,181,544 Prudential Insurance Co., 6.375%, 7/23/2006 .......... 2,000,000 1,882,260 Salomon Inc., 7.3%, 5/15/2002 ........................ 2,000,000 1,996,200 ----------- 24,246,439 ----------- Media 9.9% AMFM, Inc., 10.5%, 1/15/2007 ......................... 1,000,000 1,062,500 AMFM, Inc., 8%, 11/1/2008 ............................ 2,500,000 2,468,750 British Sky Broadcasting Group PLC, 6.875%, 2/23/2009 2,150,000 1,925,282 Cablevision Systems Corp., 7.875%, 2/15/2018 ......... 1,500,000 1,443,600 Charter Communication Holdings LLC, 8.25%, 4/1/2007 .. 2,500,000 2,237,500 Liberty Media Group, 7.875%, 7/15/2009 ............... 1,650,000 1,633,385 News America Holdings Inc., 9.25%, 2/1/2013 .......... 2,500,000 2,738,075 Outdoor Systems, Inc., 8.875%, 6/15/2007 ............. 1,000,000 1,013,750 TCI-Communications, Inc., 8%, 8/1/2005 ............... 2,500,000 2,566,825 Time Warner Inc., 9.125%, 1/15/2013 .................. 1,000,000 1,111,320 ----------- 18,200,987 ----------- Service Industries 1.3% Allied Waste North America, 7.375%, 1/1/2004 ......... 1,250,000 1,087,500 Primedia, Inc., 7.625%, 4/1/2008 ..................... 1,500,000 1,342,500 ----------- 2,430,000 ----------- Durables 2.1% Daimler-Benz NA Holdings, 7.375%, 9/15/2006 .......... 1,500,000 1,466,160 Lear Corp, 7.96%, 5/15/2005 .......................... 2,500,000 2,398,000 ----------- 3,864,160 ----------- Energy 4.5% Barrett Resources Corp., 7.55%, 2/1/2007 ............. 1,500,000 1,413,750 Duke Energy Corp., 10%, 8/15/2001 .................... 2,000,000 2,059,960 Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas Corp., 6.875%, 12/1/2007 ... 2,500,000 2,324,325 Pioneer Natural Resources Co., 6.5%, 1/15/2008 ....... 1,950,000 1,693,166 Williams Gas Pipeline Center, 7.375%, 11/15/2006 ..... 900,000 884,952 ----------- 8,376,153 ----------- Construction 0.8% American Standard Companies Inc., 7.625%, 2/15/2010 .. 1,500,000 1,335,000 Nortek, Inc., 9.125%, 9/1/2007 ....................... 250,000 228,750 ----------- 1,563,750 ----------- The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 76
N-30D79th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 79th
[Enlarge/Download Table] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Transportation 1.8% Delta Airlines, Inc., 7.9%, 12/15/2009 .................. 550,000 522,830 Newport News Shipbuilding Co., 8.625%, 12/1/2006 ........ 1,500,000 1,466,250 Northwest Airlines Corp., 7.875%, 3/15/2008 ............. 1,500,000 1,300,680 ----------- 3,289,760 ----------- Utilities 3.2% Cleveland Electric Illumination Co., 7.67%, 7/1/2004 .... 2,000,000 1,981,960 Detroit Edison Co., 7.5%, 2/1/2005 ...................... 2,000,000 1,989,280 Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 6.625%, 7/1/2005 ............ 2,000,000 1,878,440 ----------- 5,849,680 ----------- Total Corporate Bonds (Cost $105,436,419) ............... 100,339,368 ----------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Investment Portfolio-- 100% (Cost $193,447,063) (a) 184,716,952 ----------- ----------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Effective maturities may be shorter due to prepayments. ** Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Government agency securities. (a) At March 31, 2000, the net unrealized depreciation on investments based on cost for federal income tax purposes of $193,447,063 was as follows: Aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all investments in which there is an excess of value over tax cost ................ $ 1,022,144 Aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all investments in which there is an excess of tax cost over value ................ (9,752,255) ------------ Net unrealized depreciation $(8,730,111) ------------ ------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Purchases and sales of investment securities (excluding short-term investments and direct obligations of the U.S. Government) for the six months ended March 31, 2000 aggregated $75,662,380 and $100,169,190, respectively. Purchases and sales of direct obligations of the U.S. Government aggregated $76,764,945, and $74,416,920, respectively. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At September 30, 1999, the Fund had a net tax basis capital loss carryforward of approximately $39,000, which may be applied against any realized net taxable capital gains of each succeeding year until fully utilized or until September 30, 2007, the expiration date. In addition, from November 1, 1998 through September 30, 1999, the Fund incurred approximately $2,634,000 of net realized capital losses. As permitted by tax regulations, the Fund intends to elect to defer these losses and treat them as arising in the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000. The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 77
N-30D80th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 80th
AARP BALANCED STOCK AND BOND FUND [Enlarge/Download Table] LIST OF INVESTMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 (UNAUDITED) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS 1.7% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ State Street Bank and Trust Company, 6.05%, to be repurchased at $10,108,094 on 4/3/2000** (Cost $10,103,000) .............................................. 10,103,000 10,103,000 -------------- U.S. GOVERNMENT & AGENCIES 9.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ U.S. Treasury Note, 5.5%, 8/31/2001 ........................................... 800,000 789,376 U.S. Treasury Note, 6%, 8/15/2004 ............................................. 1,950,000 1,923,500 U.S. Treasury Note, 6.5%, 10/15/2006 .......................................... 4,000,000 4,033,760 U.S. Treasury Note, 6%, 8/15/2009 ............................................. 4,500,000 4,443,030 U.S. Treasury Note Inflationary Index, 3.875%, 1/15/2009 ...................... 4,000,000 4,069,962 U.S. Treasury Bond, 6.5%, 2/15/2010 ........................................... 3,000,000 3,105,000 U.S. Treasury Bond, 7.25%, 5/15/2016 .......................................... 20,000,000 22,100,000 U.S. Treasury Bond, 5.25%, 2/15/2029 .......................................... 6,050,000 5,425,156 U.S. Treasury Bond, 6.125%, 8/15/2029 ......................................... 1,500,000 1,528,830 U.S. Treasury Bond Inflationary Index, 3.625%, 4/15/2028 ...................... 5,750,000 5,695,240 -------------- Total U.S. Government & Agencies (Cost $53,959,611) ........................... 53,113,854 -------------- GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION*** 1.2% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Government National Mortgage Association, 7% with various maturities to 5/1/2029 (Cost $7,330,717) ...................... 7,234,632 7,011,867 -------------- U.S. GOVERNMENT BACKED MORTGAGES*** 4.1% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Federal National Mortgage Association, 8%, 2/1/2013 ........................... 3,451,437 3,491,335 Federal National Mortgage Association 6.50% with various maturities to 3/1/2028 21,669,493 20,386,189 -------------- Total U.S. Government Backed Mortgages (Cost $24,926,551) ..................... 23,877,524 -------------- COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS*** 1.3% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., Series 1997-A7, 7.25%, 11/25/2027 ........... 3,886,955 3,780,064 Residential Funding Mortgage Securities, Series 1993-A2, 6.83%, 9/25/2023 ..... 2,174,515 2,137,140 Ryland Mortgage Securities Corp., 8%, 8/25/2025 ............................... 1,989,549 1,967,687 -------------- Total Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (Cost $8,163,067) ................... 7,884,891 -------------- FOREIGN BONDS -- U.S. $ DENOMINATED 1.6% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PacifiCorp Australia LLC, 6.15%, 1/15/2008 .................................... 6,000,000 5,606,340 Petroleum Geo-Services, 6.625%, 3/30/2008 ..................................... 4,000,000 3,673,480 -------------- Total Foreign Bonds-- U.S. $ Denominated (Cost $10,037,380) ................... 9,279,820 -------------- The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 78
N-30D81st Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 81st
[Enlarge/Download Table] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Principal Amount ($) Value ($) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Asset Backed*** 1.9% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Automobile Receivables 0.5% First Security Auto Owner Trust, Series 1999-2 A3, 6%, 1/15/2003 3,000,000 2,969,531 ----------- Credit Card Receivables 1.4% Citibank Credit Card Master Trust I, 6%, 4/10/2003 ............. 3,500,000 3,456,250 MBNA Master Credit Card Trust, 5.8%, 12/15/2005 ................ 5,000,000 4,820,300 ----------- 8,276,550 ----------- Total Asset Backed (Cost $11,488,015) .......................... 11,246,081 ----------- Corporate Bonds 14.4% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Consumer Staples 1.3% Bass America Inc., 6.625%, 3/1/2003 ............................ 5,000,000 4,895,900 Pepsi Bottling Holdings, Inc., 5.625%, 2/17/2009 ............... 3,500,000 3,118,290 ----------- 8,014,190 ----------- Communications 1.7% Sprint Capital Corp., 6.125%, 11/15/2008 ....................... 3,000,000 2,731,170 Vodafone Airtouch PLC, 7.75%, 2/15/2010 ........................ 2,300,000 2,315,870 WorldCom, Inc., 6.4%, 8/15/2005 ................................ 5,000,000 4,799,750 ----------- 9,846,790 ----------- Financial 6.9% Boeing Capital Corp., Medium Term Note, 6.75%, 12/23/2003 ...... 3,000,000 2,965,050 Capital One Bank, Medium Term Note, 5.95%, 2/15/2001 ........... 4,000,000 3,936,640 First Union National Bank, 6.18%, 2/15/2036 .................... 2,500,000 2,336,975 Ford Motor Credit Corp., 5.75%, 2/23/2004 ...................... 10,000,000 9,427,300 Ford Motor Credit Corp., 7.375%, 10/28/2009 .................... 2,450,000 2,402,715 General Electric Capital Corp., 7%, 2/3/2003 ................... 2,350,000 2,350,799 General Motors Acceptance Corporation, 7.75%, 1/19/2010 ........ 550,000 555,077 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 7.8%, 1/28/2010 ..................... 1,450,000 1,439,125 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 6%, 2/17/2009 ....................... 550,000 490,859 PNC Funding Corp., 7%, 9/1/2004 ................................ 1,400,000 1,378,468 PNC Funding Corp., 7.5%, 11/1/2009 ............................. 2,200,000 2,159,102 Prudential Insurance Co., 6.375%, 7/23/2006 .................... 3,000,000 2,823,390 Salomon Inc., 7.3%, 5/15/2002 .................................. 2,300,000 2,295,630 Southern National Corp., 7.05%, 5/23/2003 ...................... 4,000,000 3,921,040 Wells Fargo & Co., 6.875%, 4/1/2006 ............................ 2,000,000 1,938,120 ----------- 40,420,290 ----------- Media 2.1% News America Holdings, Inc., 9.25%, 2/1/2013 ................... 3,000,000 3,285,690 TCI-Communications, Inc., 8%, 8/1/2005 ......................... 4,000,000 4,106,920 Time Warner, Inc., 9.125%, 1/15/2013 ........................... 4,500,000 5,000,940 ----------- 12,393,550 ----------- The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 79
N-30D82nd Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 82nd
AARP Balanced Stock and Bond Fund -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Manufacturing 0.5% Fort James Corp., 6.625%, 9/15/2004 .............. 3,000,000 2,878,950 ------------ Energy 0.8% Anadarko Petroleum Corp., 5.875%, 10/15/2003 ..... 5,000,000 4,735,200 ------------ Transportation 0.1% Delta Airlines, Inc., 7.9%, 12/15/2009 ........... 600,000 570,360 ------------ Utilities 1.0% Alabama Power Co., 7.125%, 8/15/2004 ............. 2,700,000 2,681,397 Detroit Edison Co., 7.5%, 2/1/2005 ............... 3,500,000 3,481,240 ------------ 6,162,637 ------------ Total Corporate Bonds (Cost $ 87,313,785) ........ 85,021,967 Common Stocks 64.8% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shares -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Consumer Discretionary 1.0% Department & Chain Stores Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ............................ 108,300 6,010,650 ------------ Consumer Staples 3.1% Alcohol & Tobacco 1.0% Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. ................... 94,500 5,882,625 ------------ Food & Beverage 1.2% PepsiCo, Inc. .................................... 212,500 7,344,531 ------------ Package Goods/Cosmetics 0.9% Avon Products, Inc. .............................. 177,700 5,164,406 ------------ Health 5.7% Biotechnology 0.3% Amgen Inc.* ...................................... 33,500 2,056,063 ------------ Medical Supply & Specialty 1.4% Becton, Dickinson & Co. .......................... 69,400 1,826,088 Medtronic, Inc. .................................. 120,500 6,198,219 ------------ 8,024,307 ------------ Pharmaceuticals 4.0% American Home Products Corp. ..................... 201,300 10,794,713 Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. ......................... 85,000 4,908,750 Johnson & Johnson, Inc. .......................... 46,800 3,278,925 Merck & Co., Inc. ................................ 71,500 4,441,938 ------------ 23,424,326 ------------ Communications 7.0% Cellular Telephone 0.6% Vodafone AirTouch PLC (ADR) ...................... 67,000 3,722,688 ------------ The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 80
N-30D83rd Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 83rd
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shares Value ($) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Telephone/Communications 6.4% AT&T Corp. ..................................... 75,400 4,241,250 Bell Atlantic Corp. ............................ 103,864 6,348,687 BellSouth Corp. ................................ 156,100 7,336,700 GTE Corp. ...................................... 97,100 6,894,100 Global Crossing Ltd.* .......................... 99,230 4,062,228 SBC Communications, Inc. ....................... 82,325 3,457,650 Sprint Corp. ................................... 85,400 5,380,200 ------------ 37,720,815 ------------ Financial 11.8% Banks 3.8% Chase Manhattan Corp. .......................... 92,800 8,091,000 First Union Corp. .............................. 120,166 4,476,184 FleetBoston Financial Corp. .................... 121,700 4,442,050 J.P. Morgan & Co., Inc. ........................ 14,900 1,963,075 US Bancorp ..................................... 140,300 3,069,063 ------------ 22,041,372 ------------ Insurance 1.5% American International Group, Inc. ............. 79,500 8,705,250 ------------ Consumer Finance 2.0% American Express Co. ........................... 17,600 2,621,300 Citigroup, Inc. ................................ 154,000 9,134,125 ------------ 11,755,425 ------------ Other Financial Companies 4.3% Federal National Mortgage Association .......... 150,300 8,482,556 Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. ............... 87,400 9,641,313 Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. ............... 89,200 7,275,375 ------------ 25,399,244 ------------ Real Estate 0.2% General Growth Properties, Inc. (REIT) ......... 44,800 1,363,600 ------------ Media 2.4% Advertising 0.5% Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. ........... 61,000 2,882,250 ------------ Broadcasting & Entertainment 1.5% Walt Disney Co. ................................ 208,100 8,610,138 ------------ Cable Television 0.4% Comcast Corp. "A" ............................. 57,800 2,507,075 ------------ Service Industries 3.0% EDP Services 1.7% Electronic Data Systems Corp. .................. 95,700 6,142,744 First Data Corp. ............................... 85,600 3,787,800 ------------ 9,930,544 ------------ Miscellaneous Commercial Services 0.3% Sabre Group Holdings, Inc. "A" ................. 54,606 2,017,009 ------------ The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 81
N-30D84th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 84th
AARP Balanced Stock and Bond Fund -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shares Value ($) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Printing/Publishing 1.0% McGraw-Hill, Inc. ................................ 124,000 5,642,000 ------------ Durables 2.2% Aerospace 0.9% Rockwell International Corp. ..................... 125,500 5,247,469 ------------ Automobiles 0.9% Ford Motor Co. ................................... 107,900 4,956,656 ------------ Construction/Agricultural Equipment 0.4% Deere & Co. ...................................... 67,800 2,576,400 ------------ Manufacturing 7.5% Chemicals 1.6% Dow Chemical Co. ................................. 65,600 7,478,400 E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. .................... 41,100 2,173,163 ------------ 9,651,563 ------------ Diversified Manufacturing 1.7% General Electric Co. ............................. 66,800 10,366,525 ------------ Industrial Specialty 3.2% Corning, Inc. .................................... 96,200 18,662,800 ------------ Machinery/Components/Controls 1.0% Parker-Hannifin Corp. ............................ 138,400 5,717,650 ------------ Technology 12.5% Computer Software 5.2% America Online, Inc.* ............................ 60,500 4,068,625 Computer Associates International, Inc. .......... 76,100 4,504,169 Microsoft Corp.* ................................. 81,800 8,691,250 Oracle Corp.* .................................... 174,700 13,637,519 ------------ 30,901,563 ------------ Electronic Components/Distributors 1.1% Cisco Systems, Inc.* ............................. 86,100 6,656,606 ------------ Electronic Data Processing 2.5% Compaq Computer Corp. ............................ 169,000 4,499,625 Hewlett-Packard Co. .............................. 31,700 4,202,231 International Business Machines Corp. ............ 48,000 5,664,000 ------------ 14,365,856 ------------ Semiconductors 3.7% Conexant Systems, Inc.* .......................... 36,400 2,584,400 Intel Corp. ...................................... 146,800 19,368,425 ------------ 21,952,825 ------------ Energy 6.5% Oil & Gas Production 5.2% Exxon Mobil Corp. ................................ 145,323 11,307,946 Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. (New York shares) ...... 115,800 6,665,738 Texaco, Inc. ..................................... 108,400 5,812,950 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 82
N-30D85th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 85th
[Enlarge/Download Table] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shares Value ($) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Fina SA (ADR) ..................................... 94,574 6,963,011 ------------ 30,749,645 ------------ Oil Companies 0.5% Chevron Corp. ........................................... 30,100 2,782,369 ------------ Oilfield Services/Equipment 0.8% Schlumberger Ltd. ....................................... 61,800 4,727,700 ------------ Metals & Minerals 0.5% Steel & Metals Alcoa, Inc. ............................................. 39,500 2,774,875 ------------ Transportation 0.2% Airlines AMR Corp.* .............................................. 41,800 1,332,375 ------------ Utilities 1.4% Electric Utilities FPL Group, Inc. ......................................... 66,800 3,076,970 Unicom Corp. ............................................ 145,000 5,292,500 ------------ 8,369,470 ------------ Total Common Stocks (Cost $292,862,847) ................. 381,996,665 ------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Investment Portfolio -- 100% (Cost $506,184,973) (a) 589,535,669 ============ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Non income producing security. ** Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Government agency securities. *** Effective maturities may be shorter due to prepayments. (a) At March 31, 2000, the net unrealized appreciation on investments based on cost for federal income tax purposes of $507,165,330 was as follows: Aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all investments in which there is an excess of value over tax cost............................. $ 99,816,981 Aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all investments in which there is an excess of tax cost over value................................ (17,446,642) ------------- Net unrealized appreciation $ 82,370,339 ============= -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Purchases and sales of investment securities (excluding short-term investments and direct obligations of the U.S. Government) for the six months ended March 31, 2000 aggregated $262,262,037 and $379,288,921, respectively. Purchases and sales of direct obligations of the U.S. Government aggregated $48,936,266 and $45,332,547, respectively. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 83
N-30D86th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 86th
AARP GROWTH AND INCOME FUND LIST OF INVESTMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 (UNAUDITED) [Enlarge/Download Table] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Amount ($) Value ($) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS 1.1% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State Street Bank and Trust Company, 6.05%, to be repurchased at $59,963,216 on 4/3/2000** (Cost $59,933,000) ............................................ 59,933,000 59,933,000 ------------- Commercial Paper 1.1% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bell Atlantic Network Funding Corp., 5.9%***, 4/20/2000 ........................ 20,000,000 19,937,722 Bell Atlantic Network Funding Corp., 5.9%***, 4/24/2000 ........................ 15,000,000 14,943,458 Finova Capital Corp., 5.93%***, 5/18/2000 ...................................... 30,000,000 29,767,742 ------------- Total Commercial Paper (Cost $64,648,922) ...................................... 64,648,922 ------------- Common Stocks 97.8% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shares -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Consumer Discretionary 1.6% Department & Chain Stores Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. .......................................................... 1,613,200 89,532,600 ------------- Consumer Staples 4.9% Alcohol & Tobacco 1.5% Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. ................................................. 1,402,200 87,286,950 ------------- Food & Beverage 1.9% PepsiCo, Inc. .................................................................. 3,154,300 109,020,494 ------------- Package Goods/Cosmetics 1.5% Avon Products, Inc. ............................................................ 2,888,400 83,944,125 ------------- Health 8.6% Biotechnology 0.5% Amgen Inc.* .................................................................... 496,200 30,454,275 Medical Supply & Specialty 2.1% Becton, Dickinson & Co. ........................................................ 1,027,800 27,043,988 Medtronic, Inc. ................................................................ 1,787,700 91,954,819 ------------- 118,998,807 ------------- Pharmaceuticals 6.0% American Home Products Corp. ................................................... 2,989,000 160,285,125 Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. ....................................................... 1,239,900 71,604,225 Johnson & Johnson, Inc. ........................................................ 704,400 49,352,025 Merck & Co., Inc. .............................................................. 1,059,000 65,790,375 ------------- 347,031,750 ------------- The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 84
N-30D87th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 87th
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shares Value ($) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Communications 10.6% Cellular Telephone 1.0% Vodafone AirTouch PLC (ADR)* ............. 993,100 55,179,119 ------------ Telephone/Communications 9.6% AT&T Corp. ............................... 1,086,200 61,098,753 Bell Atlantic Corp. ...................... 1,533,380 93,727,852 BellSouth Corp. .......................... 2,304,400 108,306,800 GTE Corp. ................................ 1,440,200 102,254,200 Global Crossing Ltd.* .................... 1,495,150 61,207,703 SBC Communications, Inc. ................. 1,199,767 50,390,214 Sprint Corp. ............................. 1,220,800 76,910,400 ------------ 553,895,922 ------------ Financial 17.6% Banks 5.6% Chase Manhattan Corp. .................... 1,359,700 118,548,844 First Union Corp. ........................ 1,737,174 64,709,732 FleetBoston Financial Corp. .............. 1,716,300 62,644,950 J.P. Morgan & Co., Inc. .................. 250,300 32,977,025 US Bancorp ............................... 2,107,900 46,110,313 ------------ 324,990,864 ------------ Insurance 2.2% American International Group, Inc. ....... 1,173,300 128,476,350 ------------ Consumer Finance 2.9% American Express Co. ..................... 246,900 36,772,662 Citigroup, Inc. .......................... 2,171,600 128,803,025 ------------ 165,575,687 ------------ Other Financial Companies 6.5% Federal National Mortgage Association .... 2,230,600 125,889,488 Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. ......... 1,298,700 143,262,844 Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. ......... 1,255,000 102,360,937 ------------ 371,513,269 ------------ Real Estate 0.4% General Growth Properties, Inc. (REIT) (b) 772,600 23,516,013 ------------ Media 3.4% Advertising 0.7% Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. ..... 901,900 42,614,775 ------------ Broadcasting & Entertainment 2.1% Walt Disney Co. .......................... 2,964,700 122,664,463 ------------ Cable Television 0.6% Comcast Corp. "A" ........................ 827,100 35,875,463 ------------ Service Industries 4.5% EDP Services 2.5% Electronic Data Systems Corp. ............ 1,426,700 91,576,306 First Data Corp. ......................... 1,270,800 56,232,900 ------------ 147,809,206 ------------ The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. 85
N-30D88th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 88th
AARP GROWTH AND INCOME FUND ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Shares Value ($) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Miscellaneous Commercial Services 0.5% Sabre Group Holdings, Inc. "A" ............ 785,234 29,004,581 ------------- Printing/Publishing 1.5% McGraw-Hill, Inc. ......................... 1,845,400 83,965,700 ------------- Durables 3.3% Aerospace 1.4% Rockwell International Corp. .............. 1,871,000 78,231,187 ------------- Automobiles 1.3% Ford Motor Co. ............................ 1,597,900 73,403,531 ------------- Construction/Agricultural Equipment 0.6% Deere & Co. ............................... 1,003,500 38,133,000 ------------- Manufacturing 11.0% Chemicals 2.5% Dow Chemical Co. .......................... 974,200 111,058,800 E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. ............. 577,700 30,545,888 ------------- 141,604,688 ------------- Diversified Manufacturing 2.6% General Electric Co. ...................... 979,600 152,021,675 ------------- Industrial Specialty 4.8% Corning, Inc. ............................. 1,428,800 277,187,200 ------------- Machinery/Components/Controls 1.1% Parker-Hannifin Corp. ..................... 1,578,300 65,203,519 ------------- Technology 19.0% Computer Software 7.9% America Online, Inc.* ..................... 898,000 60,390,500 Computer Associates International, Inc. ... 1,067,300 63,170,819 Microsoft Corp.* .......................... 1,213,900 128,976,875 Oracle Corp.* ............................. 2,589,200 202,119,425 ------------- 454,657,619 ------------- Electronic Components/Distributors 1.7% Cisco Systems, Inc.* ...................... 1,275,600 98,619,825 ------------- Electronic Data Processing 3.7% Compaq Computer Corp. ..................... 2,506,700 66,740,888 Hewlett-Packard Co. ....................... 490,100 64,968,881 International Business Machines Corp. ..... 679,300 80,157,400 ------------- 211,867,169 ------------- Semiconductors 5.7% Conexant Systems, Inc.* ................... 540,200 38,354,200 Intel Corp. ............................... 2,182,300 287,927,206 ------------- 326,281,406 ------------- Energy 10.1% Oil & Gas Production 6.3% Exxon Mobil Corp. ......................... 2,167,867 168,687,151 Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. (New York shares) 1,658,400 95,461,650 Texaco, Inc. .............................. 1,875,400 100,568,325 ------------- 364,717,126 ------------- The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements 86
N-30D89th Page of 179TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 89th
[Enlarge/Download Table] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shares Value ($) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Oil Companies 2.6% Chevron Corp. ............................................. 440,400 40,709,475 Total Fina S.A. "B" ....................................... 710,543 106,279,352 ------------- 146,988,827 ------------- Oilfield Services/Equipment 1.2% Schlumberger Ltd. ......................................... 880,900 67,388,850 ------------- Metals & Minerals 0.7% Steel & Metals Alcoa, Inc. ............................................... 585,700 41,145,425 ------------- Transportation 0.3% Airlines AMR Corp.* ................................................ 584,700 18,637,313 ------------- Utilities 2.2% Electric Utilities FPL Group, Inc. ........................................... 992,100 45,698,606 Unicom Corp. .............................................. 2,153,800 78,613,700 ------------- 124,312,306 ------------- Total Common Stocks (Cost $4,167,448,960) ................. 5,631,751,079 ------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Investment Portfolio -- 100% (Cost $4,292,030,882) (a) 5,756,333,001 ============= ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Non income producing. ** Repurchase agreements are fully collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Government agency securities. *** Annualized yield at time of purchase; not a coupon rate. (a) At March 31, 2000, the net unrealized appreciation on investments based on cost for federal income tax purposes of $4,290,931,712 was as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all investments in which there is an excess of value over tax cost ............................. $ 1,588,453,690 Aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all investments in which there is an excess of tax cost over value ............................. (123,052,401) --------------- Net unrealized appreciation .......