|
CNL
RETIREMENT PROPERTIES, INC.
|
This
Supplement is part of, and should be read in conjunction with, the Prospectus
dated March 21, 2005. Capitalized
terms used in this Supplement have the same meaning as in the Prospectus
unless
otherwise stated herein.
Information
as to proposed Properties for which the Company has entered into initial
commitments to acquire and the number and types of Properties acquired
by the
Company are presented as of May 25, 2005, and all references to commitments
and
Property acquisitions should be read in that context. Proposed Properties
for
which the Company enters into initial commitments to acquire, as well as
Property acquisitions that occur after May 25, 2005, will be reported in
a
subsequent Supplement.
RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS
|
Type
and Location
|
|
Date
Acquired
|
| |
|
|
|
Retirement
Communities
|
|
|
|
Encore
Senior Living
|
|
|
|
Anaheim
Hills, CA
|
|
3/31/05
|
|
Apple
Valley, CA
|
|
3/31/05
|
|
Clearwater,
FL
|
|
3/31/05
|
|
Fort
Myers, FL
|
|
3/31/05
|
|
Greenacres,
FL
|
|
3/31/05
|
|
Naples,
FL
|
|
3/31/05
|
|
Pensacola,
FL (Carpenter's Creek)
|
|
3/31/05
|
|
Pensacola,
FL (Encore Senior Village-Pensacola)
|
|
3/31/05
|
|
Peoria,
AZ
|
|
3/31/05
|
|
Phoenix,
AZ
|
|
3/31/05
|
|
Portland,
OR (Calaroga Terrace)
|
|
3/31/05
|
|
Portland,
OR (Encore Senior Village at Portland)
|
|
3/31/05
|
|
Riverside,
CA
|
|
3/31/05
|
|
Salt
Lake City, UT
|
|
3/31/05
|
|
Tallahassee,
FL
|
|
3/31/05
|
|
Tucson,
AZ
|
|
3/31/05
|
| |
|
|
|
Medical
Office Building
|
|
|
|
Petersburg,
VA (1)
|
|
4/28/05
|
|
(1)
|
This
Property is being developed.
|
The
Encore Properties are independent living/assisted living Properties, which
opened between 1968 and 1999. The 16 Properties include 417 independent
living
units, 340 assisted living units and 638 units for residents with Alzheimer's
and related memory disorders.
The
medical office building represents approximately 39,000 square
feet.
As
of May
25, 2005, we owned interests in 245 Properties consisting of 187 seniors'
housing Properties, 57 medical office buildings and one undeveloped tract
of
land, and a 55% ownership interest in a development and property management
company that either manages or is developing 35 of our medical office buildings.
In addition, we have commitments to acquire one seniors' housing Property,
four
medical office buildings and ownership interests in entities that own two
additional medical office buildings. The seniors' housing Properties are
or are
expected to be leased on a long-term, triple-net basis and are managed
by
Operators of seniors' housing facilities. The medical office buildings
are or
are expected to be leased on either a gross basis or a triple-net basis
for a
period of five to 20 years.
As
of May
25, 2005, 108 of our 187 seniors' housing Properties are operated by Sunrise
Senior Living Services, Inc. Additionally, two of the Properties we owned
as of
May 25, 2005 are being developed by Sunrise Development, Inc., a wholly
owned
subsidiary of Sunrise Senior Living Services, Inc. Upon completion of each
development, the Property will be operated by Sunrise Senior Living Services,
Inc. Seven additional Operators manage our remaining 77 seniors' housing
Properties as of May 25, 2005.
The
Board
of Directors declared Distributions of $0.0592 to stockholders of record
on
April 1, May 1 and June 1, 2005, payable by June 30, 2005.
THE
OFFERINGS
GENERAL
As
of May
25, 2005, the Company had received subscriptions from this offering for
32.2
million Shares totaling $322.3 million in Gross Proceeds. As of May 25,
2005,
the Company had received aggregate subscriptions for 251 million Shares
totaling
$2.51 billion in gross proceeds, including 7.0 million Shares ($70.4 million)
issued pursuant to the Reinvestment Plan from its Prior Offerings and this
offering. As of May 25, 2005, net proceeds to the Company from its offerings
of
Shares and capital contributions from the Advisor, after deduction of selling
commissions, the marketing support fee, due diligence expense reimbursements
and
offering expenses, totaled $2.3 billion. As of May 25, 2005, the Company
has
used $1.9 billion of net offering proceeds, $71.4 million in advances relating
to its line of credit and $1.2 billion in Permanent Financing, as well
as the
assumption of $88.5 million in bonds payable, to invest $3.2 billion in
245
Properties. As of May 25, 2005, the Company had repaid $51.4 million in
advances
relating to its line of credit, had paid $160.7 million in Acquisition
Fees and
Acquisition Expenses, including Acquisition Fees on Permanent Financing,
and had
used $16.2 million to redeem 1.7 million Shares of Common Stock, leaving
$141.2
million available to invest in Properties, Mortgage Loans and other Permitted
Investments. For a discussion regarding our management strategy with respect
to
this offering for the remainder of 2005, see "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and
Capital Resources."
ESTIMATED
USE OF PROCEEDS
FOOTNOTES:
The
following footnote paragraph updates and replaces footnote paragraph (3)
on page
30 of the Prospectus.
|
(3)
|
Acquisition
Fees include all fees and commissions paid by us to any person
or entity
in connection with the selection or acquisition of any Property
or other
Permitted Investments or the making of any Mortgage Loan, including
to
Affiliates or non-Affiliates. Acquisition Fees do not include
Acquisition
Expenses. See "The Offering - Plan of Distribution" for a description
of
the circumstances under which Acquisition Fees will be reduced
and an
applicable discount will be available to purchasers. In connection
with
making investments, if we make an investment subject to existing
debt, we
will not be able to pay Acquisition Fees with respect to such
debt out of
debt proceeds and may need to use Net Offering Proceeds (defined
in
footnote paragraph (5) on page 31 of the Prospectus) to pay
such
Acquisition Fees. In that event, the cash available to make
investments
will decrease. For example, assuming we raise the maximum offering
amount
of $3,954,000,000, use all of the $3,469,713,750 available
to make
investments, and such investments are subject to 25% assumed
debt, then
the estimated Acquisition Fees payable from offering proceeds
will
increase by approximately $34,697,000, or 0.88%. Assuming we
sell
100,000,000 Shares and therefore raise $984,000,000, use all
of the
$861,690,750 available to make investments, and such investments
are
subject to 25% assumed debt, then the estimated Acquisition
Fees payable
from offering proceeds will increase by approximately $8,617,000,
or
0.88%.
|
MANAGEMENT
COMPENSATION
For
information concerning compensation paid to the Advisor and Affiliates,
see
"Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."
BUSINESS
INDUSTRY
PERFORMANCE
The
following paragraph updates and replaces the fourth full paragraph on page
49 of
the Prospectus and the two tables below are inserted following such
paragraph.
According
to Health,
United States, 2003, the
health care industry represented over $1.4 trillion in annual expenditures
in
the United States in 2001. This number is expected to reach $3.1 trillion
in
2012, growing at an average annual rate of 7.3% during the forecast period
of
2002 through 2012. According to the Centers
for Medicare & Medicaid Services, in
2003,
national health care expenditures represented approximately 15% of GDP,
as
compared to 8.8% in 1980, as illustrated below.
National
Health Expenditures
as
a
Percentage of GDP
1980
—
2003
|
Year
|
Percentage
of GDP
|
|
1980
|
8.8%
|
|
1981
|
9.1%
|
|
1982
|
9.9%
|
|
1983
|
10.0%
|
|
1984
|
9.9%
|
|
1985
|
10.1%
|
|
1986
|
10.2%
|
|
1987
|
10.5%
|
|
1988
|
10.9%
|
|
1989
|
11.4%
|
|
1990
|
12.0%
|
|
1991
|
12.7%
|
|
1992
|
13.0%
|
|
1993
|
13.3%
|
|
1994
|
13.3%
|
|
1995
|
13.4%
|
|
1996
|
13.3%
|
|
1997
|
13.2%
|
|
1998
|
13.2%
|
|
1999
|
13.2%
|
|
2000
|
13.3%
|
|
2001
|
14.1%
|
|
2002
|
14.9%
|
|
2003
|
15.3%
|
Source:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid, 2003 data
As
reported by the American
Hospital Association, the
demand for quality outpatient care is increasing. As illustrated below,
total
hospital outpatient visits increased 64% from 1980 to 2003.
Total
Hospital Outpatient Visits
in
Community Hospitals
1980
—
2003
|
Year
|
Hospital
Outpatient
Visits
|
|
1980
|
202
|
|
1981
|
203
|
|
1982
|
206
|
|
1983
|
210
|
|
1984
|
212
|
|
1985
|
219
|
|
1986
|
232
|
|
1987
|
244
|
|
1988
|
268
|
|
1989
|
285
|
|
1990
|
301
|
|
1991
|
321
|
|
1992
|
348
|
|
1993
|
367
|
|
1994
|
383
|
|
1995
|
414
|
|
1996
|
440
|
|
1997
|
450
|
|
1998
|
474
|
|
1999
|
495
|
|
2000
|
521
|
|
2001
|
538
|
|
2002
|
556
|
|
2003
|
563
|
Source:
American Hospital Association, 2003 data
PROPERTY
ACQUISITIONS
The
following information should be read in conjunction with the "Business
—
Property Acquisitions" section beginning on page 53 of the
Prospectus.
Between
March 1, 2005 and May 25, 2005, we acquired interests in 16 seniors' housing
Properties. The seniors' housing Properties are leased on a long-term,
triple-net basis and are managed by Encore. In addition, we acquired one
medical
office building that is being developed and is expected to be leased on
a
triple-net basis for a period of 15 years. The general terms of the lease
agreements are described in the section of the Prospectus entitled "Business
—
Description of Property Leases."
The
following table sets forth the facility type, location, date acquired,
capacity
(stated in units or square feet), year built and our ownership percentage
of
each of the Properties we acquired between March 1, 2005 and May 25, 2005.
Seniors' housing facilities are apartment-like facilities and are therefore
stated in units. Medical office buildings are measured in square
feet.
|
Facility
and Location (1)
|
|
Date
Acquired
|
|
Capacity
(2)
|
|
Year
Built
|
|
Percentage
Owned
|
|
Independent
Living Facilities:
|
|
|
|
(Units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Encore
Senior Living
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anaheim
Hills, CA
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
212
|
|
1989
|
|
100%
|
|
Portland,
OR (Calaroga Terrace)
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
265
|
|
1968
|
|
100%
|
|
Salt
Lake City, UT
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
75
|
|
1996
|
|
100%
|
|
Assisted
Living Facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Encore
Senior Living
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apple
Valley, CA
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
12
|
|
1986
|
|
100%
|
|
Clearwater,
FL
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
60
|
|
1999
|
|
100%
|
|
Fort
Myers, FL
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
60
|
|
1998
|
|
100%
|
|
Greenacres,
FL
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
60
|
|
1998
|
|
100%
|
|
Naples,
FL
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
60
|
|
1999
|
|
100%
|
|
Pensacola,
FL (Carpenter's Creek)
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
94
|
|
1988
|
|
100%
|
|
Pensacola,
FL (Encore Senior Village-Pensacola)
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
60
|
|
1997
|
|
100%
|
|
Peoria,
AZ
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
72
|
|
1997
|
|
100%
|
|
Phoenix,
AZ
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
48
|
|
1998
|
|
100%
|
|
Portland,
OR (Encore Senior Village at Portland)
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
96
|
|
1997
|
|
100%
|
|
Riverside,
CA
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
40
|
|
1997
|
|
100%
|
|
Tallahassee,
FL
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
99
|
|
1986
|
|
100%
|
|
Tucson,
AZ
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
60
|
|
1999
|
|
100%
|
|
Medical
Office Building:
|
|
|
|
(Square
Feet)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petersburg,
VA
|
|
4/28/2005
|
|
(3)
|
|
(3)
|
|
70%
|
|
(1)
|
Certain
seniors' housing facilities consist of both independent living
units and
assisted living units in which case the Property is listed under
the
facility type representing the majority of the units and reflects
the
total of all units combined.
|
|
(2)
|
Independent
living facilities and assisted living facilities are stated in
units and
the medical office building is measured in square
feet.
|
|
(3)
|
Property
is under construction and is expected to be completed in April
2006. Upon
completion, the Property is expected to consist of approximately
39,000
square feet.
|
SENIORS'
HOUSING COMMUNIY BRANDS
Encore
Brand.
According to www.encoresl.com,
Encore
Senior Living ("Encore") operates 35 senior housing communities located
in
Arizona, California, Florida, Oklahoma, Oregon, Utah and Wisconsin. Encore
offers several types of communities, including assisted living and independent
living. Encore is recognized for their progressive approach to Alzheimer's
care;
known as the Rediscovery™ program. With Rediscovery, Encore replaces the
clinical setting of a skilled nursing facility with the comforts of home,
providing warmth and familiarity needed to help residents feel at ease.
The
specialized Rediscovery program encourages the use of residents' remaining
skills, which ensures each individual is able to function as independently
as
possible. As of July 1, 2004, the American Seniors Housing Association
ranked
Encore as the nation's 45th
largest
manager of seniors' housing.
PENDING
INVESTMENTS
As
of May
25, 2005, we had initial commitments to acquire one seniors' housing Property,
four medical office buildings and ownership interests in entities which
own two
additional medical office buildings for an aggregate purchase price of
$41.8
million. The Properties include one Encore Property (in Victorville, California)
and six medical office buildings (two in each of Little Rock, Arkansas
and
Chattanooga, Tennessee, and one in each of Westminster, Colorado and Towson,
Maryland).
The
seniors' housing Property is expected to be acquired from Encore Senior
Living
IV, LLC. Four of the medical office buildings are expected to be acquired
from
Catholic Health Initiatives. One of the medical office buildings is expected
to
be developed on the campus of St. Joseph Medical Center in Towson, Maryland,
and
the remaining medical office building is expected to be developed on the
campus
of St. Anthony North Hospital in Westminster, Colorado. We do not expect
to own
the land for either of the medical office buildings to be developed; however,
we
expect to sign a ground lease with St. Joseph Medical Center and St. Anthony
North Hospital, respectively.
The
acquisition of each of these investments is subject to the fulfillment
of
certain conditions. There can be no assurance that any or all of the conditions
will be satisfied or, if satisfied, that one or more of these investments
will
be acquired by us. If acquired, the lease for the seniors' housing Property
is
expected to be entered into on substantially the same terms described in
"Business — Description of Property Leases." The medical office buildings are
expected to be leased on either a triple-net or a gross basis with lease
terms
expected to range from five to 20 years. The medical office buildings are
expected to have multiple tenants and are expected to be managed by DASCO,
in
which we own a 55% interest.
The
following table sets forth the facility type, location, capacity (stated
in
units or square feet), year built and our expected ownership percentage
for each
of the investments.
|
Facility
and Location
|
|
Capacity
(1)
|
|
Year
Built
|
|
Expected
Ownership
|
|
Assisted
Living Facility:
|
|
(Units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Encore
Senior Living
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Victorville,
CA
|
|
49
|
|
1988
|
|
100%
|
|
Medical
Office Buildings:
|
|
(Square
Feet)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Little
Rock, AR
|
|
31,380
|
|
1985
|
|
100%
|
|
Little
Rock, AR
|
|
7,280
|
|
1972
|
|
100%
|
|
Westminster,
CO
|
|
(2)
|
|
(2)
|
|
70%
|
|
Towson,
MD
|
|
(3)
|
|
(3)
|
|
70%
|
|
Chattanooga,
TN
|
|
44,979
|
|
2003
|
|
100%
|
|
Chattanooga,
TN
|
|
63,338
|
|
1995
|
|
100%
|
|
(1)
|
Assisted
living facilities are stated in units and medical office buildings
are
measured in square feet.
|
|
(2)
|
Property
is expected to begin construction in September 2005 with completion
scheduled for June 2006. Upon completion, the building is expected
to
consist of 61,750 square feet.
|
|
(3)
|
Property
is expected to begin construction in July 2005 with completion
scheduled
for June 2006. Upon completion, the building is expected to consist
of
61,373 square feet.
|
BORROWING
The
following information should be read in conjunction with the "Business
—
Borrowing" section beginning on page 73 of the Prospectus.
In
May
2005, we entered into preliminary negotiations with the administrative
agent of
our existing line of credit to increase the facility to $250.0 million.
We are
seeking modifications of certain terms and conditions, including more favorable
pricing and a two-year term with two one-year renewal options. We expect
to
close the new line of credit in the third quarter of 2005; however, there
can be
no assurance that this transaction will be consummated. In the event that
the
line of credit is not extended or renegotiated, we intend to repay the
existing
outstanding balance on the line of credit from available cash.
On
May 5,
2005, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements effective June
1, 2005
with Wachovia Bank, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A., and one interest rate
swap
agreement effective July 1, 2005 with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., for an
aggregate notional amount of $233.8 million to hedge against unfavorable
fluctuations in the LIBOR and Freddie Mac Reference Bill rates of our variable
interest rate mortgage notes payable. The hedges have a 4.19% weighted
average
fixed rate plus a 1.20% weighted average spread resulting in an all-in
fixed
interest rate of 5.39% until 2010.
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
The
following table sets forth certain financial information for the Company,
and
should be read in conjunction with the section entitled "Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the
Financial
Information commencing on page F-1 of this Prospectus Supplement and the
Prospectus (amounts in thousands except per Share data and footnotes).
This
table updates and replaces the "Selected Financial Data" section beginning
on
page 77 of the Prospectus.
| |
|
Quarter
Ended
March
31,
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
|
2000
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
91,693
|
|
$
|
50,718
|
|
$
|
264,541
|
|
$
|
95,594
|
|
$
|
18,852
|
|
$
|
1,900
|
|
$
|
1,085
|
|
|
Income
from continuing operations
|
|
|
32,556
|
|
|
27,723
|
|
|
119,506
|
|
|
58,435
|
|
|
11,372
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
(1,588
|
)
|
|
25
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Net
income (1)
|
|
|
32,635
|
|
|
27,801
|
|
|
117,918
|
|
|
58,460
|
|
|
11,372
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
|
|
52,814
|
|
|
23,329
|
|
|
139,398
|
|
|
60,658
|
|
|
16,785
|
|
|
2,173
|
|
|
1,096
|
|
|
Cash
flows used in investing activities
|
|
|
(201,492
|
)
|
|
(397,651
|
)
|
|
(1,309,694
|
)
|
|
(1,012,600
|
)
|
|
(358,090
|
)
|
|
(22,931
|
)
|
|
(14,429
|
)
|
|
Cash
flows provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
198,607
|
|
|
483,140
|
|
|
1,054,987
|
|
|
1,078,232
|
|
|
355,384
|
|
|
47,301
|
|
|
8,766
|
|
|
Cash
distributions declared
and paid (2)
|
|
|
42,593
|
|
|
28,841
|
|
|
147,156
|
|
|
59,784
|
|
|
14,379
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
Income
from continuing operations per Share
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
Loss
from discontinued operations per
Share
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Net
income per Share (Basic
and Diluted)
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
Funds
from operations (3)
|
|
|
55,446
|
|
|
37,294
|
|
|
181,186
|
|
|
76,256
|
|
|
14,610
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
Cash
distributions declared and
paid per Share
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of Shares
outstanding:
(Basic
and Diluted)
|
|
|
240,699
|
|
|
169,112
|
|
|
210,343
|
|
|
88,840
|
|
|
22,035
|
|
|
2,391
|
|
|
846
|
|
| |
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
|
2000
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate investment properties
|
|
$
|
3,394,553
|
|
$
|
2,136,318
|
|
$
|
3,174,345
|
|
$
|
1,528,497
|
|
$
|
380,367
|
|
$
|
35,233
|
|
$
|
14,418
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
3,649,781
|
|
|
2,569,164
|
|
|
3,369,641
|
|
|
1,761,899
|
|
|
441,765
|
|
|
64,447
|
|
|
14,689
|
|
|
Debt
obligations
|
|
|
1,409,416
|
|
|
785,752
|
|
|
1,193,548
|
|
|
392,583
|
|
|
45,327
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,795
|
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
1,481,731
|
|
|
821,400
|
|
|
1,263,923
|
|
|
415,958
|
|
|
51,970
|
|
|
3,537
|
|
|
5,485
|
|
|
Minority
interests
|
|
|
3,360
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Total
stockholders' equity
|
|
|
2,164,690
|
|
|
1,747,764
|
|
|
2,103,357
|
|
|
1,345,941
|
|
|
389,795
|
|
|
60,910
|
|
|
9,204
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties
owned at end of
period
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Properties
acquired during
period
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
|
| (1) |
To
the extent that Operating Expenses payable or reimbursable by
us in any
Expense Year exceed the 2%/25% Guidelines (the "Expense Cap"),
the Advisor
shall reimburse us within 60 days after the end of the Expense
Year the
amount by which the total Operating Expenses paid or incurred
by us exceed
the Expense Cap. During the Expense Year ended March 31, 2005,
Operating
Expenses did not exceed the Expense Cap. During the Expense Years
ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000, the Advisor reimbursed us $0.1 million
and $0.2
million, respectively, in Operating Expenses. No such amounts
were
reimbursed in 2004, 2003 or 2002.
|
| (2) |
Cash
distributions are declared by the Board of Directors and generally
are
based on various factors, including cash available from operations.
For
the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, and the years ended
December
31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000, approximately 23%, 4%, 20%,
2%, 21%,
39% and 55% of cash Distributions, respectively, represented
a return of
capital in accordance with GAAP. Cash Distributions treated as
a return of
capital on a GAAP basis represent the amount of cash distributions
in
excess of net earnings on a GAAP basis, including deductions
for
depreciation expense. We have not treated such amounts as a return
of
capital for purposes of calculating Invested Capital and the
Stockholders'
8% Return.
|
| (3) |
We
consider funds from operations ("FFO") to be an indicative measure
of
operating performance due to the significant effect of depreciation
of
real estate assets on net income. FFO, based on the revised definition
adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association
of Real
Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") and as used herein, means
net income
determined in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses
from sales
of property, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate
assets and
after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
(Net
income determined in accordance with GAAP includes the non-cash
effect of
straight-lining rent increases throughout the lease terms. This
straight-lining is a GAAP convention requiring real estate companies
to
report rental revenue based on the average rent per year over
the life of
the leases. During the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004,
and the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000, net
income
included approximately $11.9 million, $7.9 million, $40.6 million,
$10.4
million, $1.2 million, $77,000 and $21,000, respectively, of
these
amounts.) We believe that by excluding the effect of depreciation,
amortization and gains or losses from sales of real estate, all
of which
are based on historical costs and which may be of limited relevance
in
evaluating current performance, FFO can facilitate comparisons
of
operating performance between periods and between other equity
REITs. FFO
was developed by NAREIT as a relative measure of performance
and liquidity
of an equity REIT in order to recognize that income-producing
real estate
historically has not depreciated on the basis determined under
GAAP.
However, FFO (i) does not represent cash generated from operating
activities determined in accordance with GAAP (which, unlike
FFO,
generally reflects all cash effects of transactions and other
events that
enter into the determination of net income), (ii) is not necessarily
indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and (iii)
should not
be considered as an alternative to net income determined in accordance
with GAAP as an indication of our operating performance, or to
cash flow
from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP
as a measure
of either liquidity or our ability to make Distributions. FFO
as presented
may not be comparable to amounts calculated by other companies.
Accordingly, we believe that in order to facilitate a clear understanding
of the consolidated historical operating results, FFO should
be considered
in conjunction with net income and cash flows as reported
in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
See the
Financial Information commencing on page F-1 of this Prospectus
Supplement
and the Prospectus.
|
| |
|
Quarter
Ended
March
31,
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
|
2000
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$
|
32,635
|
|
$
|
27,801
|
|
$
|
117,918
|
|
$
|
58,460
|
|
$
|
11,372
|
|
$
|
916
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
of real estate assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
operations
|
|
|
19,502
|
|
|
8,706
|
|
|
54,262
|
|
|
16,354
|
|
|
3,068
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
Discontinued
operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of lease intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
operations
|
|
|
3,328
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
8,606
|
|
|
1,167
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Discontinued
operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of deferred leasing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
operations
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Discontinued
operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of unconsolidated entity
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of minority interests
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
| |
|
$
|
55,446
|
|
$
|
37,294
|
|
$
|
181,186
|
|
$
|
76,256
|
|
$
|
14,610
|
|
$
|
1,440
|
|
$
|
528
|
|
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
following information should be read in conjunction with the "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"
section beginning on page 79 of the Prospectus.
OVERVIEW
Our
primary focus during the first quarter of 2005 was stabilizing the operating
performance of our Properties and developing and strengthening relationships
with our tenants, operators, managers and lenders. In addition, we raised
capital through our equity offering, placed permanent or construction financing
on new or unencumbered Properties and invested these proceeds in Properties
and
other Permitted Investments. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, we
received gross offering proceeds of $87.5 million, obtained or assumed
$260.4
million of Permanent Financing, drew $16.7 million under our construction
loan
facilities and repaid $60.0 million under a term loan. We also invested
$231.8
million in 22 Properties, including 17 seniors' housing facilities, four
medical
office buildings and a parcel of land.
As
of
March 31, 2005, we held real estate assets located in 33 states consisting
of
(dollars in thousands):
| |
|
Number
of Properties
|
|
|
|
|
Seniors’
housing facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
183
|
|
$
|
2,775,502
|
|
|
Under
development
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
88,394
|
|
|
Medical
office buildings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
497,509
|
|
|
Under
development
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
33,148
|
|
| |
|
|
242
|
|
$
|
3,394,553
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate held for sale
|
|
|
2
|
|
$
|
4,820
|
|
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We
primarily acquire or develop Properties. We may also provide Mortgage Loans
to
operators of seniors' housing or other health care-related facilities,
however,
we have not entered into any Mortgage Loans as of March 31, 2005. We have
relied
on the sale of our Common Stock to fund a significant portion of our Property
acquisitions and other Permitted Investments. We also obtain funds through
borrowings under permanent or construction financing, operating activities
and
draws on our revolving line of credit. We are required to distribute at
least
90% of our taxable income to stockholders in order to maintain our REIT
qualifications. During the remainder of 2005, we expect to take measures
to
manage the amount of proceeds raised through our public offering in order
to
more closely align offering proceeds with our actual capital requirements.
We
plan to monitor and manage the amount of proceeds raised through our public
offering in order to avoid amassing additional capital that greatly exceeds
our
capital requirements. Excess offering proceeds would need to be placed
in short
term accounts which would likely earn interest at lower rates than the
return
which would be expected if such capital had been invested in Properties
or other
Permitted Investments. Due to this management strategy, we do not anticipate
raising significant additional proceeds through our public offering in
the near
term. We believe that borrowings under permanent or construction financing,
operating activities, draws on our revolving line of credit and offering
proceeds, to the extent available, will be sufficient to meet our capital
requirements.
Common
Stock Offerings
As
of
March 31, 2005, we have made five best efforts public offerings and received
aggregate subscriptions of $2.5 billion representing 247.0 million Shares.
The
price per Share of all of our equity offerings has been $10 per Share with
the
exception of Shares purchased through our Reinvestment Plan which are currently
priced at $9.50 per Share. Selling Commissions, marketing support fees,
due
diligence expense reimbursements and other offering expenses will not exceed
13%
of gross proceeds.
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2005, net proceeds received from our offering
of
shares, after deduction of selling commissions, marketing support fees,
due
diligence expense reimbursements, offering expenses and redemptions, totaled
approximately $71.3 million.
During
the period April 1, 2005 through May 25, 2005, we received additional net
offering proceeds of $30.9 million, and incurred acquisition fees and costs
of
$1.3 million. We also used $1.3 million in connection with the acquisition
of a
70% equity interest in an entity that owns land on which a 39,000 square
foot
medical office building is expected to be developed commencing in June
2005.
The
number of Properties to be acquired and Mortgage Loans and other Permitted
Investments in which we may invest will depend on the amount of net offering
proceeds and loan proceeds available to us and the availability of reasonably
priced Properties. During 2005, we expect to have access to capital through
the
proceeds that have already been raised from our 2004 Offering and the leveraging
of our unencumbered or newly acquired Properties that will be sufficient
to take
advantage of acquisition opportunities.
Under
our
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, if we do not list our shares
on
a national securities exchange or over-the-counter market by December 31,
2008,
we will commence an orderly liquidation of our assets and the distribution
of
net proceeds to our stockholders.
Redemptions
We
have a
redemption plan under which we may elect to redeem Shares, subject to certain
conditions and limitations. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, 847,143
Shares were redeemed and retired at $9.50 per Share for approximately $8.0
million.
Property
Acquisitions
At
March
31, 2005, our investment portfolio consisted of 244 Properties located
in 33
states with an aggregate investment amount of approximately $3.4 billion
compared to 222 Properties located in 32 states with an aggregate investment
amount of approximately $3.2 billion at December 31, 2004. During the quarter
ended March 31, 2005, we invested $231.8 million in 22 Properties. The
Properties acquired were 17 seniors' housing facilities, consisting primarily
of
assisted living and independent living facilities, three medical office
buildings consisting of approximately 162,000 square feet, one medical
office
building under construction and a 10.4 acre parcel of land which we intend
to
sell. We, as lessor, have entered into long-term, triple-net lease agreements
relating to the seniors' housing Properties and have entered or expect
to enter
into shorter term, gross or triple-net lease agreements relating to the
medical
office buildings. As of March 31, 2005, one of our seniors' housing facilities
and a parcel of land were held for sale.
Twenty
Properties acquired during the quarter ended March 31, 2005, are subject
to
operating leases. Operating leases related to our seniors' housing facilities
generally provide for initial terms of 15 years with options that allow
the
tenants to renew the leases for 5 to 20 successive years subject to the
same
terms and conditions as the initial leases. In addition to minimum annual
base
rent, substantially all of the seniors' housing leases require contingent
rent
if operating performance or occupancy rate thresholds, as defined in the
lease
agreements, are achieved. The leases also provide for the tenant to fund,
in
addition to minimum rent payments, an FF&E Reserve fund. The tenant deposits
funds into the FF&E Reserve account and periodically uses these funds to
cover the cost of the replacement, renewal and additions to furniture,
fixtures
and equipment. Operating leases related to our medical office buildings
include
both triple-net and gross basis leases and have initial terms of 5 to 15
years,
provide for minimum rent and are generally subject to renewal options.
The gross
basis leases allow us to recover a portion of the medical office buildings
operating expenses from the tenants, as specified in the lease agreements.
Substantially all Property leases require minimum annual base rent to be
paid in
monthly installments and increase at predetermined intervals (typically
on an
annual basis) during the terms of the leases.
One
of
the medical office buildings that we acquired during the quarter ended
March 31,
2005 is under construction and is subject to a ground lease that will commence
upon the completion of the medical office building.
In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 141, Business
Combinations ("SFAS 141"), we allocate the value associated with having
in-place
operating leases at the date of acquisition to an intangible lease asset
or
liability considering factors associated with lease origination costs,
customer
relationships and above or below market leases. During the quarter ended
March
31, 2005, we allocated $8.3 million of acquired real estate value to in-place
lease origination costs and customer relationships which are amortized
over the
remaining terms of the leases acquired with each Property, $0.7 million
to an
intangible lease asset related to above market lease values and $0.4 million
to
an intangible lease liability related to below market lease values which
are
amortized to rental income from operating leases over the remaining terms
of the
leases acquired with each Property.
At
March
31, 2005, our restricted cash balance included $0.3 million being held
in escrow
to fund the acquisition of two Properties that we had entered into commitments
to acquire.
Other
Investments
We
own a
10% interest in a limited partnership that owns an office building located
in
Orlando, Florida in which the Advisor and its Affiliates lease office space.
Our
equity investment in the partnership was $300,000. Our share in the limited
partnership's distributions is equivalent to our equity interest in the
limited
partnership. The remaining interest in the limited partnership is owned
by
several Affiliates of the Advisor. In connection with this acquisition,
we have
severally guaranteed a 16.67% share of a $15.5 million unsecured promissory
note
of the limited partnership that matures August 28, 2005. At March 31, 2005,
the
note had an outstanding balance of $14.1 million. The limited partnership
intends to extend the term of the note, however, there can be no assurance
that
this objective will be met. If the note is not extended, it is likely that
we
will be required to contribute $2.3 million to the limited partnership
to fund
our 16.67% share of the outstanding note balance at maturity.
In
August
2004, we acquired a 55% interest in DASCO for $6.0 million including closing
costs. We allocated $5.8 million to goodwill which represents the excess
of the
purchase price paid plus closing costs over the fair market value of the
tangible assets (office furniture and equipment) acquired in the business
acquisition. The purchase of the 55% interest in DASCO has provided and
may
continue to provide opportunities for us to participate in new medical
office
building development and acquisition opportunities as well as enter the
business
of managing medical office buildings. DASCO operated 30 and was developing
four
of our medical office buildings at March 31, 2005.
Investments
Subsequent to March 31, 2005. On
April
28, 2005, we acquired, for $1.3 million, a 70% equity interest in an entity
that
owns land located in Virginia on which a 39,000 square foot medical office
building will be developed by DASCO commencing in June 2005 with an estimated
completion date of April 2006. We expect to obtain $6.0 million in construction
financing, and total project costs are estimated to be $9.9
million.
Pending
Investments.
As of
May 25, 2005, we had commitments to acquire one seniors’ housing facility, four
medical office buildings and ownership interests in entities that own two
additional medical office buildings, both of which are expected to be developed,
for an aggregate purchase price of $41.8, million, including development
costs,
subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions. We plan to obtain or
assume
financing of approximately $11.6 million in connection with the acquisition
of
two of these Properties. It is expected that Encore will operate the seniors'
housing facility, and DASCO will manage four and develop two of the medical
office buildings. There can be no assurance that these transactions will
be
consummated.
Borrowings
Line
of Credit. We
have
an $85.0 million revolving line of credit that expires in September 2005.
Eleven
Properties with an aggregate real estate value of $122.4 million collateralize
the $85.0 million revolving line of credit; however, the collateral provided
by
these 11 Properties only allows us to draw up to $71.4 million. This credit
facility requires payments of interest only at LIBOR plus a percentage
that
fluctuates until maturity (5.35% at March 31, 2005), depending on our aggregate
amount of debt outstanding in relation to our total assets. The line has
some
covenants typically found in revolving loan facilities, including covenants
to
maintain a minimum net worth and minimum collateral value. We may use the
revolving line of credit to fund acquisitions, pay fees, make Distributions,
repay Permanent Financing and fund working capital for general business
purposes. We have in the past and, we expect to continue to repay amounts
drawn
under the revolving line of credit with proceeds received from equity offerings
(to the extent available), Permanent Financing, the sale of assets or working
capital. As of March 31, 2005, we had an outstanding balance on our line
of
credit of $20.0 million.
In
May
2005, we entered into preliminary negotiations with the administrative
agent of
our existing line of credit to increase the facility to $250.0 million.
We are
seeking modifications of certain terms and conditions, including more favorable
pricing and a two-year term with two one-year renewal options. We expect
to
close the new line of credit in the third quarter of 2005; however, there
can be
no assurance that this transaction will be consummated. In the event that
the
line of credit is not extended or renegotiated, we intend to repay the
existing
outstanding balance on the line of credit from available cash.
Term
Loan.
On
January 13, 2005, we repaid and terminated a $60.0 million, 14-day term
loan
used for the acquisition of certain Properties until Permanent Financing
was
obtained in January 2005.
Permanent
Financing. During
the quarter ended March 31, 2005, we obtained $260.4 million in Permanent
Financing by assuming existing debt on various Properties acquired during
the
quarter and by encumbering certain existing Properties with new debt. As
of
March 31, 2005, our aggregate Permanent Financing was $1.2 billion and
was
collateralized by Properties with an aggregate net book value of $2.2 billion.
We have approximately $146.6 million in mortgage note maturities and principal
amortization due during the remainder of 2005. A $140.4 million loan that
matures in October 2005, contains an extension option that we expect to
exercise. We also expect to refinance certain loans and, to the extent
available, use offering proceeds to repay the maturing loans.
Approximately
51% of our mortgage notes payable at March 31, 2005, were subject to variable
interest rates; therefore, we are exposed to market changes in interest
rates as
explained in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and
Results of Operations — Market Risk" below. Some of our variable rate loans
contain provisions that allow us to convert the variable interest rates
to fixed
interest rates based on U.S. Treasury rates plus a premium at the time
the
conversion option is exercised. Fixed interest rates range from 4.85% to
8.42%
with a weighted average rate of 6.27%. Certain fixed rate loans assumed
by us
contain substantial prepayment penalties and/or defeasance provisions that
may
preclude repayment of the loans prior to their maturity dates. Many of
the loans
have financial covenants which are typically found in commercial loans
and which
are primarily based on the operations of the Properties. Certain loans
contain
extension options with terms similar to the initial loan terms.
On
May 5,
2005, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements effective June
1, 2005
with Wachovia Bank, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A., and one interest rate
swap
agreement effective July 1, 2005 with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., for an
aggregate notional amount of $233.8 million to hedge against unfavorable
fluctuations in the LIBOR and Freddie Mac Reference Bill rates of our variable
interest rate mortgage notes payable. The hedges have a 4.19% weighted
average
fixed rate plus a 1.20% weighted average spread resulting in an all-in
fixed
interest rate of 5.39% until 2010.
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2005, we incurred $2.0 million in loan costs
in
connection with the placement and assumption of Permanent Financing
facilities.
The
table
below summarizes Permanent Financing that we obtained during the quarter
ended
March 31, 2005 (dollars in thousands):
|
Date
Funded /Assumed
|
|
Mortgage
Payable
|
|
Maturity
Date
|
|
Interest
Rate
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
Rate Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January
2005
|
|
$
|
7,108
|
|
|
June
2010
|
|
|
8.41%
(1
|
)
|
|
March
2005
|
|
|
39,010
|
|
|
April
2012
|
|
|
4.85
|
%
|
|
March
2005
|
|
|
34,299
|
|
|
January
2011-April 2013
|
|
|
5.69%
- 7.15
|
%
|
| |
|
|
80,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable
Rate Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January
2005
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
January
2010
|
|
|
LIBOR
+ 1.25
|
%
|
|
February
2005
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
October
2005
|
|
|
Fannie
Mae Discount MBS rate
plus .90
|
%
|
|
March
2005
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
March
2010
|
|
|
LIBOR
+ 1.50
|
%
|
| |
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$
|
260,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The
stated interest rate of 8.41% on this loan was greater than that
available
to us in the open capital market for comparable debt at the time
of
assumption. Consequently, we recognized $0.7 million in debt
premium that
will be amortized over the period of the loan which reduces the
effective
interest rate to 5.67%. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005,
we
recognized $31,000 in debt premium amortization that is included
in
interest and loan cost amortization expense in the accompanying
financial
statements.
|
Construction
Financing. During
the quarter ended March 31, 2005, we entered into a new $6.6 million
construction facility and collectively drew $16.7 million under all of
our
construction loans related to certain Properties under various stages of
development. Total construction loans outstanding at March 31, 2005 were
$98.2
million, and total liquidity remaining was $53.8 million. The loans are
variable
interest rate loans and mature from November 2006 through December 2013.
We
anticipate that we will obtain Permanent Financing or use proceeds from
our
offerings (to the extent available) to pay the construction loans as they
become
due.
Bonds
Payable.
We have
non-interest bearing life care bonds payable to certain residents of our
two
CCRCs. Generally, the bonds are refundable to a resident upon the resident
moving out of the CCRC or to a resident's estate upon the resident's death.
In
some instances, the bonds are not refunded until the unit has been successfully
remarketed to a new resident. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005,
we issued
new bonds to new residents of these retirement facilities totaling $2.4
million,
and used the proceeds from the bonds issued in the current and prior periods
to
retire $2.5 million of the existing bonds. As of March 31, 2005, the bonds
payable had an outstanding balance of $94.4 million.
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
The
following table presents our contractual cash obligations and related payment
periods as of March 31, 2005 (in thousands):
| |
|
Less
than 1 Year
|
|
2-3
Years
|
|
4-5
Years
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Mortgages
payable
|
|
$
|
149,222
|
|
$
|
131,083
|
|
$
|
566,749
|
|
$
|
348,459
|
|
$
|
1,195,513
|
|
|
Revolving
line of credit
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
Bonds
payable (1)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
94,419
|
|
|
94,419
|
|
|
Construction
loans payable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
91,400
|
|
|
4,283
|
|
|
2,510
|
|
|
98,193
|
|
|
Security
deposits and rent support
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
29,125
|
|
|
29,125
|
|
| |
|
$
|
169,222
|
|
$
|
222,483
|
|
$
|
571,032
|
|
$
|
474,513
|
|
$
|
1,437,250
|
|
| |
(1)
|
It
is expected that the proceeds from the issuance of new refundable
life
care bonds will be used to retire the existing bonds; therefore,
bond
redemptions are not expected to create a current net cash
obligation.
|
The
following table presents our commitments, contingencies and guarantees,
and
related expiration periods as of March 31, 2005 (in thousands):
| |
|
Less
than 1 Year
|
|
2-3
Years
|
|
4-5
Years
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Guarantee
of uncollateralized promissory note of unconsolidated entity
(1)
|
|
$
|
2,346
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,346
|
|
|
Earnout
provisions (2)
|
|
|
33,479
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
35,479
|
|
|
Capital
improvements to investment Properties (3)
|
|
|
53,392
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
53,392
|
|
|
Ground
leases
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
19,128
|
|
|
21,001
|
|
|
Pending
investments (4)
|
|
|
28,178
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
28,178
|
|
| |
|
$
|
117,730
|
|
$
|
2,766
|
|
$
|
772
|
|
$
|
19,128
|
|
$
|
140,396
|
|
| |
(1)
|
In
connection with the acquisition of a 10% limited partnership
interest in
CNL Plaza, Ltd., we severally guaranteed 16.67%, or $2.6 million,
of a
$15.5 million uncollateralized promissory note of the limited
partnership
that matures August 28, 2005. As of March 31, 2005, the uncollateralized
promissory note had an outstanding balance of $14.1 million.
We have not
been required to fund any amounts under this guarantee. In the
event we
are required to fund amounts under the guarantee, we believe
that such
amounts would be recoverable either from operations of the related
asset
or proceeds upon liquidation. The limited partnership intends
to extend
the note's maturity date, however, there can be no assurance
that this
objective will be met. If the note is not extended, it is likely
that we
will be required to contribute $2.3 million to the limited partnership
to
fund our 16.67% share of the outstanding note balance at
maturity.
|
| |
(2)
|
In
connection with the acquisition of 41 Properties, we may be required
to
make additional payments if earnout provisions are achieved by
the earnout
date for each Property. The calculation generally considers the
net
operating income for the Property, our initial investment in
the Property
and the fair value of the Property. In the event an amount is
due, the
applicable lease will be amended and annual minimum rent will
increase
accordingly. Amounts presented represent maximum exposure to
additional
payments. Earnout amounts related to six additional Properties
are subject
to future values and events which are not quantifiable at March
31, 2005,
and are not included in the table
above.
|
| |
(3)
|
Commitments
for the funding of Properties under development are expected
to be funded
with draws from construction loan
facilities.
|
| |
(4)
|
As
of March 31, 2005, we had commitments to acquire four Properties,
subject
to the fulfillment of certain conditions.
|
Market
Risk
Approximately
51% of our mortgage notes payable and all of our construction loans payable
at
March 31, 2005 were subject to variable interest rates; therefore, we are
exposed to market changes in interest rates. During the quarter ended March
31,
2005, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in the U.S. Treasury and
LIBOR
rates would have resulted in additional interest costs of approximately
$1.5
million. This sensitivity analysis contains certain simplifying assumptions
(for
example, it does not consider the impact of changes in prepayment risk
or credit
spread risk). Therefore, although it gives an indication of our exposure
to
interest rate change, it is not intended to predict future results and
our
actual results will likely vary.
We
are
also subject to interest rate risk through outstanding balances on our
variable
rate line of credit. We had $20.0 million outstanding at March 31,
2005.
To
mitigate interest rate risk, we may pay down the mortgages or the line
of credit
prior to their maturity dates with offering proceeds (to the extent available)
should interest rates rise substantially. To further mitigate interest
rate
risk, in May 2005 we implemented a policy to protect against interest rate
risk.
Our primary strategy is to protect against this risk by using derivative
transactions as appropriate to minimize the variability that variable interest
rate fluctuations could have on cash flow. In May 2005, we entered into
two
interest rate swap agreements effective June 1, 2005 with Wachovia Bank,
N.A.
and Bank of America, N.A., and one interest rate swap agreement effective
July
1, 2005 with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., for an aggregate notional amount
of
$233.8 million to hedge against unfavorable fluctuations in the LIBOR and
Freddie Mac Reference Bill rates of our variable interest rate mortgage
notes
payable. The hedges have a 4.19% weighted average fixed rate plus a 1.20%
weighted average spread resulting in an all-in fixed interest rate of 5.39%
until 2010.
Certain
loans contain substantial prepayment penalties and/or defeasance provisions
that
could preclude the repayment of the loans prior to their maturity
dates.
Following
is a summary of our Permanent Financing, construction loans and line of
credit
obligations at March 31, 2005 (in thousands):
| |
|
Permanent
Financing Expected Maturities
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Fixed
Rate Debt:
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
10,512
|
|
$
|
49,467
|
|
$
|
143,445
|
|
$
|
382,037
|
|
$
|
585,461
|
|
$
|
586,752
|
|
|
Average
Interest Rate
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7.42
|
%
|
|
6.20
|
%
|
|
6.02
|
%
|
|
5.77
|
%
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
|
6.27
|
%
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable
Rate Debt:
|
|
$
|
160,445
|
|
$
|
99,997
|
|
$
|
90,618
|
|
$
|
130,393
|
|
$
|
4,282
|
|
$
|
242,510
|
|
$
|
728,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
Interest Rate
|
|
|
3.93
|
%
|
|
5.20
|
%
|
|
6.62
|
%
|
|
4.78
|
%
|
|
4.60
|
%
|
|
3.96
|
%
|
|
4.60
|
%
|
|
|
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Until
Properties are acquired or Mortgage Loans are entered into, we may accumulate
significant amounts of cash from offering proceeds or Permanent Financings.
The
cash is held in short-term (defined as investments with a maturity of three
months or less), highly liquid investments which we believe to have appropriate
safety of principal. This investment strategy provides high liquidity in
order
to facilitate our use of these funds to acquire Properties at such time
as
Properties suitable for acquisition are identified or to fund Mortgage
Loans and
take advantage of favorable capital market conditions. At March 31, 2005,
we had
$101.7 million invested in short-term investments as compared to $51.8
million
at December 31, 2004. The increase was primarily attributable to offering
proceeds received from the sale of Shares of Common Stock and proceeds
received
from the placement of new Permanent Financing during the quarter ended
March 31,
2005, offset by cash used to purchase 22 Properties.
Accounts
and Other Receivables
Our
accounts and other receivables balance was $20.4 million at March 31, 2005
and
$20.5 million at December 31, 2004. The change was primarily due to an
increase
in rental revenues receivable to $23.4 million at March 31, 2005 from $21.8
million at December 31, 2004, offset by a $0.8 million increase in the
reserve
for doubtful accounts and a $0.9 million decrease in other receivables.
Past due
amounts aggregated $12.3 million and $10.7 million at March 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively. We are experiencing delays in receiving
current
rent amounts due on certain seniors' housing facilities as a result of
adverse
market or operating conditions. These tenants are thinly capitalized and
rely on
the net operating income generated from the seniors' housing facilities
to fund
rent obligations under their leases.
Based
on
our analysis of estimated future cash flows to be generated by the facilities,
we anticipate that certain delinquent amounts will be collected in 2005.
We have
been and will continue to work with these tenants and the operators of
the
respective Properties to implement a plan to increase operating efficiencies
in
order to enhance cash flow generated from the Properties to fund current
and
past due rent obligations under the leases. In addition, we are evaluating
strategic alternatives for certain facilities. The results of actual facility
operations or implementation of one or more of these alternatives could
result
in additional reserves for doubtful accounts or impairment losses that
may
impact our results of operations in future periods.
Distributions
During
the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we generated cash from operations
of
$52.8 million and $23.3 million, respectively, which included unrestricted
security deposits received from tenants of $3.4 million for the quarter
ended
March 31, 2005. We declared and paid Distributions to our stockholders
of $42.6
million and $28.8 million during the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and
2004,
respectively. In addition, on April 1, May 1 and June 1, 2005, our Board
of
Directors declared distributions to stockholders of record on those dates,
of
$0.0592 per Share of Common Stock which are payable by June 30,
2005.
Our
distribution policy is based on a balanced analysis of value creation reflective
of both current and long-term stabilized cash flows of our Properties,
our
objective of continuing to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes,
the actual operating results of each quarter and anticipated operating
results
for the coming year, economic conditions, other operating trends, our financial
condition, loan restrictions, capital requirements and avoidance of volatility
of Distributions. Our acquisition strategy is focused on opportunistically
investing in larger portfolios, which allows us to obtain increased efficiencies
as we invest the proceeds received from the sale of Shares of Common Stock,
to
the extent available, and proceeds available from the placement of Permanent
Financing. As a result, larger cash outlays are required at the time of
purchase
which causes equity proceeds to accumulate for longer periods of time in
cash
and short-term investments at lower returns prior to making these purchases.
Therefore, Distributions paid to stockholders may periodically be greater
than
cash flows generated from operations. We expect to continue a large portfolio
investment strategy during 2005, and may borrow funds from our revolving
line of
credit to make Distributions to stockholders in future quarters.
For
the
quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, approximately 80% and 67%, respectively,
of the Distributions received by stockholders were considered to be ordinary
income and approximately 20% and 33%, respectively, were considered a return
of
capital for federal income tax purposes. No amounts distributed to stockholders
for the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, were required to be or
have been
treated by us as a return of capital for purposes of calculating the
Stockholders' 8% Return on Invested Capital. We intend to continue to declare
Distributions of cash available for such purpose to the stockholders on
a
monthly basis, payable quarterly.
Liquidity
Requirements
We
believe that cash flow provided by operating activities will be sufficient
to
fund normal recurring operating expenses, regular debt service requirements
and
a significant portion of the Distributions to stockholders. To the extent
that
cash flow provided by operating activities is not sufficient to meet such
short-term liquidity requirements as a result, for example, of our portfolio
investment strategy or expenses due to the tenants defaulting under the
terms of
their lease agreements, we will use borrowings under our revolving line
of
credit. We expect to meet our other short-term liquidity requirements,
including
payment of Offering Expenses, the acquisition and development of Properties,
the
investment in Mortgage Loans and other Permitted Investments, and the scheduled
maturities of Permanent Financings, with proceeds from our offerings (to
the
extent available), advances under our revolving line of credit and new
Permanent
Financing. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements through
short-
or long-term, collateralized or uncollateralized financing or equity
financing.
Seniors'
housing facilities are generally leased on a long-term, triple-net basis,
meaning the tenants are required to pay repairs and maintenance, property
taxes,
insurance and utilities. Generally, these tenants are also required to
maintain
an FF&E Reserve account which is used to fund expenditures to refurbish
buildings, premises and equipment to maintain the leasehold in a manner
that
allows operation for its intended purpose. In the event that the
FF&E Reserve is not sufficient, we may make fixed asset expenditures, in
which case the annual minimum rent will be increased. We believe that current
tenant reserves are sufficient to meet foreseen FF&E repairs. The medical
office buildings are leased on either a triple-net or gross basis. With
respect
to the gross leases, we generally recover increases in building operating
expenses (including real estate taxes, insurance, repairs, maintenance
and
utilities) over a specified base amount from the tenants, as specified
in the
lease agreement.
Advisory
Services
On
May 2,
2005, we entered into a renewal agreement (the "Renewal Agreement") with
the
Advisor with respect to the Advisory Agreement, pursuant to which
the
Advisory Agreement was renewed for an additional one-year term commencing
on May
3, 2005, and ending on May 3, 2006. The Renewal Agreement provides
that we
will negotiate in good faith with the Advisor with respect to whether a
reduction in the percentage rate(s) of Total Proceeds to be used in determining
Acquisition Fees payable to the Advisor under the Advisory Agreement should
be
effected. Pursuant to the terms of the Renewal Agreement, we and the
Advisor will use commercially reasonable efforts to agree on any
such
reduction within sixty days of the date of the Renewal Agreement. In the
event
that we and the Advisor agree to any such reduction, the
reduction will be deemed to be effective as of May 3, 2005.
Acquisition Fees will be as agreed by us and the Advisor on a case-by-case
basis as contemplated by the Advisory Agreement and our Articles of Amendment
and Restatement until we and the Advisor have agreed on the percentage
rate(s)
of Total Proceeds to be used in determining Acquisition Fees payable to
the
Advisor under the Advisory Agreement.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Net
income for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 totaled $32.6 million or $0.14
per
Share of Common Stock, as compared to net income of $27.8 million or $0.16
per
Share of Common Stock for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. The increase
in net
income was primarily due to an increase in rental income from the Properties
that we acquired during the latter part of 2004 and in the first quarter
of 2005
offset by increases in operating expenses related to the acquired Properties,
the recognition of a provision for doubtful accounts and an impairment
charge.
These changes are discussed in further detail below. Although net income
increased significantly for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, it decreased
on a
per Share basis primarily due to a larger average accumulated amount of
cash
during 2004 and the first quarter of 2005. This cash was invested in short-term,
highly liquid investments that earned a lower return than if the cash had
been
invested in Properties.
Revenues
At
March
31, 2005, we owned 244 Properties, including 22 Properties that were acquired
in
2005, compared to 141 Properties at March 31, 2004. As a result of the
increase
in the number of Properties, we earned rental and earned income from our
leases
of $84.4 million, including $11.9 million as a result of straight-lining
rent
escalations throughout the lease terms, for the quarter ended March 31,
2005,
compared to $49.2 million, including $7.9 million of straight-line rent
revenue,
for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. We also earned $1.6 million and $1.4
million in FF&E Reserve income during the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and
2004, respectively. Because 22 Properties were owned for only a portion
of the
first quarter of 2005 and we expect to acquire additional Properties during
the
remainder of 2005, results of operations are not expected to be indicative
of
future periods. Rental income from operating leases, earned income from
direct
financing leases and FF&E Reserve income are expected to increase in
subsequent periods.
During
each of the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, rental income included
draws
on operator rent guarantees of $0.8 million and $2.6 million, respectively.
To
mitigate credit risk, certain seniors' housing leases are combined into
portfolios that contain cross-default and pooling terms. In addition, as
of
March 31, 2005, we held $29.1 million in security deposits and rent support
related to certain Properties. We also have limited guarantees from certain
tenants and operators that aggregate $18.0 million as of March 31, 2005,
related
to 13 of our Properties.
In
connection with three and 19 of our Properties, Sunrise has guaranteed
rent
payments until the earlier of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2005, respectively,
or the Properties achieving certain specified performance thresholds. Based
on
our review of the 2005 projected, pooled net operating cash flow generated
from
these Properties, we do not believe that the performance thresholds will
be
achieved prior to the expiration of the Sunrise guarantees. We identified
one
Property within the 22-Property portfolio that we determined to hold for
sale.
We
are
working with the tenant and operator of the 22-Property portfolio to implement
a
plan to enhance cash flow generated from the Properties. Failure of these
Properties to enhance cash flow from operations may result in the non-payment
of
a portion of our rent after the guarantees expire, and as a result, the
recognition of additional provisions for doubtful accounts beginning in
the
third quarter of 2005.
In
connection with eight Properties leased to wholly owned subsidiaries of
ARC, ARC
has unconditionally guaranteed all of the tenants' obligations under the
terms
of the leases, including the payment of minimum rent.
In
connection with 16 Properties leased by Encore, Encore has unconditionally
guaranteed all the tenants' obligations under the terms of the leases,
including
the payment of minimum rent.
In
connection with the purchase of five seniors' housing facilities that are
in
various stages of development and are being developed by Sunrise Development,
Inc., Sunrise has guaranteed the tenants' obligations to pay minimum rent
and
the FF&E Reserve due under the leases from the date of acquisition until the
later of (i) 30 months (March 2006) or (ii) 18 months after the final
development date, as defined in the lease agreement. During 2004, three
of these
five Properties commenced operations. In addition, Sunrise has guaranteed
the
tenants' rent obligations related to three additional seniors' housing
facilities for which construction was completed in 2004, until such time
the
operating performance of the Properties achieves predetermined rent coverage
thresholds.
There
are
five seniors' housing Properties that are experiencing operating performance
deficiencies. These Properties are included in various portfolios that
contain
cross-default and pooling terms. Some of these portfolios do not have tenant
guarantees or security deposits. We are evaluating strategic alternatives
for
these facilities. These alternatives include the transition of the facility's
management to another operator, lease restructure and sale. Based on our
evaluation, which included the analysis of undiscounted cash flows related
to
these Properties, we determined impairment of one of the facilities primarily
due to adverse market conditions. Accordingly, we have recognized a $6.2
million
impairment charge for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, to reduce the Property's
carrying value to its estimated fair value. We will continue to evaluate
the
operating performance of these Properties. Upon the occurrence of significant
changes in their operations or if it is determined that any of these Properties
should be sold, we may incur additional impairment losses. In addition,
the
failure of these Properties to generate cash flow sufficient to pay all
or a
portion of our rent may result in additional provisions for doubtful accounts
during 2005.
Although
we acquire Properties located in various states and regions and screen
our
tenants in order to reduce risks of default, failure of certain lessees,
their
guarantors, or the Sunrise or Horizon Bay brands would significantly impact
the
results of our operations.
In
addition to minimum base rent, certain leases require the payment of contingent
rent if certain operating performance or occupancy rate thresholds, as
defined
in the lease agreements, are achieved by the Properties. During the quarters
ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we recognized $1.7 million and $49,000,
respectively, of contingent rent.
During
the quarter ended March 31,
2005, we recorded $2.7 million in tenant expense reimbursement revenue,
representing contractual recoveries from tenants of 49% of our medical
office
building operating expenses.
During
each of the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we earned $0.6 million
in
interest income from investments in money market accounts and other short-term,
highly liquid investments. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, we
also
earned $0.1 million in other income.
Expenses
General
and administrative expenses and Asset Management Fees were $8.4 million
and $4.5
million for the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively,
representing 9.1% and 9.0% of revenues, respectively. The increase in expenses
is directly related to the increased number of Properties owned as well
as the
general and administrative expenses related to DASCO. The dollar amount
of
general and administrative expenses and Asset Management Fees is expected
to
increase as we acquire additional Properties and invest in Mortgage Loans;
however, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues
are
expected to decrease as we acquire additional Properties and invest in
Mortgage
Loans.
Total
property-related operating expenses for the quarters ended March 31, 2005
and
2004, were $5.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The increase was
primarily due to the acquisition of the medical office buildings in the
second
and third quarters of 2004, where we are generally responsible for property
operating expenses; however, under the terms of the leases, we recover
a portion
of the expenses from the tenants. Property operating expenses related to
medical
office buildings were $5.5 million for the quarter ended March 31,
2005.
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2005, we recognized a provision for doubtful
accounts of $0.8 million as discussed in the "Accounts and Other Receivables"
section above.
Depreciation
and amortization expense increased to $22.9 million for the quarter ended
March
31, 2005, compared to $9.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2004,
as a
result of our owning 101 additional operating Properties subject to operating
leases during the first quarter of 2005.
Interest
and loan cost amortization expense was $15.5 million and $8.0 million for
the
quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase was
a result
of our increasing the average amount of debt outstanding from $636.9 million
for
the quarter ended March 31, 2004, to $1.1 billion for the quarter ended
March
31, 2005. The weighted average interest rate was approximately 5.1% for
the
quarter ended March 31, 2005 and 5.2% for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
OTHER
Inflation
and Trends
Our
seniors' housing leases are triple-net leases and contain provisions that
we
believe will mitigate the effect of inflation. These provisions include
clauses
requiring automatic increases in base rent at specified times during the
term of
the lease (generally on an annual basis) and the payment of contingent
rent if
Properties achieve specified operating thresholds (based on factors such
as a
percentage of gross revenue above a specified level). We have also invested
in
medical office buildings, which include both triple-net and gross basis
leases.
These leases also contain provisions that mitigate the effect of inflation,
such
as scheduled base rent increases during the lease terms and with respect
to
gross leases, and the reimbursement of future increases in operating expenses
(including real estate taxes, insurance, repairs, maintenance and utilities)
over a specified base amount. Inflation and changing prices may have an
adverse
impact on the potential disposition of the Properties and on appreciation
of the
Properties.
We
believe that changes and trends in the health care industry will continue
to
create opportunities for growth of seniors' housing and other health care
facilities, including (i) the growth of operators serving specific health
care
niches, (ii) the consolidation of providers and facilities through mergers,
integration of physician practices, and elimination of duplicative services,
(iii) the pressures to reduce the cost of providing quality health care,
(iv)
more dual-income and single-parent households leaving fewer family members
available for in-home care of aging parents and necessitating more senior
care
facilities, and (v) an anticipated increase in the number of insurance
companies
and health care networks offering privately funded long-term care insurance.
Additionally, we believe that demographic trends are significant when looking
at
the potential for future growth in the health care industry. Today's baby
boomers (those born between 1946 and 1964) will begin reaching age 65 as
early
as 2011. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the age 65 plus population
is
projected to more than double between now and the year 2050, to 82 million.
Most
of this growth is expected to occur between 2010 and 2030 when the number
of
older adults is projected to grow by an average of 2.8% annually.
We
believe that during 2004, the seniors' housing industry experienced increased
occupancies and average daily rates, and generally the facilities operated
at a
higher level of efficiency. The success of the future operations of our
Properties will depend largely on each tenant's and operator's ability
to adapt
to dominant trends in the industry in each specific region, including,
among
others, greater competitive pressures, increased consolidation and changing
demographics.
We
are
not aware of any material trends, favorable or unfavorable, in either capital
resources or the outlook for long-term cash generation, nor do we expect
any
material changes in the availability and relative cost of such capital
resources. Assuming the inflation rate remains low and long-term interest
rates
do not increase significantly, we believe that inflation will not impact
the
availability of equity and debt financings.
Related
Party Transactions
Certain
of our Directors and officers hold similar positions with the Advisor,
the
parent company of the Advisor and the Managing Dealer of our public offerings,
CNL Securities Corp. Our Chairman of the Board indirectly owns a controlling
interest in the parent company of the Advisor. These Affiliates receive
fees and
compensation in connection with the offerings, Permanent Financing and
the
acquisition, management and sale of our assets.
Pursuant
to the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor and its Affiliates earn certain
fees and
are entitled to receive reimbursement of certain expenses. During the quarters
ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, the Advisor and its Affiliates earned fees
and
incurred reimbursable expenses as follows (in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Acquisition
fees (1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
fees from offering proceeds
|
|
$
|
3,067
|
|
$
|
21,866
|
|
|
Acquisition
fees from debt proceeds
|
|
|
10,451
|
|
|
21,312
|
|
| |
|
|
13,518
|
|
|
43,178
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
management fees (2)
|
|
|
4,499
|
|
|
2,264
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
of expenses (3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
expenses
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
General
and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,994
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
| |
|
|
2,040
|
|
|
1,195
|
|
| |
|
$
|
20,057
|
|
$
|
46,637
|
|
|
(1)
|
Through
the quarter ended March 31, 2005, Acquisition Fees for identifying
Properties and structuring the terms of the leases and Mortgage
Loans
equal to 4.0% of gross offering proceeds under the 2004 Offering
and loan
proceeds from Permanent Financing (4.5% of gross offering proceeds
and
loan proceeds under the Prior Offerings), excluding that portion
of the
Permanent Financing used to finance Secured Equipment Leases.
|
|
|
If we
List, the Advisor
will receive an Acquisition Fee equal to 4.0% of amounts outstanding
on
the line of credit, if any, at the time of Listing. Certain fees
payable
to the Advisor upon Listing, orderly liquidation or other sales
of
Properties are subordinate to the return of 100% of the stockholders'
invested capital plus the achievement of a cumulative, noncompounded
annual Stockholders' 8% Return on Invested
Capital. |
|
(2)
|
Monthly
Asset Management Fee of 0.05% of our real estate asset value,
as defined
in the Advisory Agreement dated May 3, 2004, and the outstanding
principal
balance of any Mortgage Loan as of the end of the preceding
month.
|
|
(3)
|
Reimbursement
of administrative services, including services related
to accounting;
financial, tax and regulatory compliance reporting; stockholder
Distributions and reporting; due diligence and marketing;
and investor
relations.
|
|
|
Pursuant
to the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is required to reimburse
us the
amount by which the total Operating Expenses paid or incurred
by us exceed
the Expense Cap in any Expense Year. Operating Expenses for
the Expense
Years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, did not exceed the Expense
Cap.
|
CNL
Securities Corp. received fees based on the amounts raised from our offerings
equal to: (i) selling commissions of 6.5% of gross proceeds under the 2004
Offering and 7.5% under the Prior Offerings, (ii) a marketing support fee
of
2.0% of gross proceeds under the 2004 Offering and 0.5% under the Prior
Offerings and (iii) beginning on December 31, 2003, an annual soliciting
dealer
servicing fee equal to 0.2% of the aggregate proceeds raised in the Company's
second public offering. The majority of these fees were reallowed to other
broker dealers. Affiliates
of the Advisor are reimbursed for certain offering expenses incurred on
our
behalf. Offering expenses paid by us, together with Selling Commissions,
the
marketing support fee and due diligence expense
reimbursements incurred by the Advisor and its Affiliates on our
behalf will
not
exceed 13% of the proceeds raised in connection with the offerings.
During
the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we incurred the following fees
and
costs (in thousands):
| |
|
Quarter
Ended
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2004
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling
Commissions
|
|
$
|
5,003
|
|
$
|
33,396
|
|
|
Marketing
support fee
|
|
|
1,529
|
|
|
2,226
|
|
|
Offering
and due diligence costs
|
|
|
1,663
|
|
|
6,387
|
|
| |
|
$
|
8,195
|
|
$
|
42,009
|
|
Amounts
due to related parties consisted of the following (in thousands):
| |
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Due
to the Advisor and its Affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures
incurred for offering expenses
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
Accounting
and administrative services
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
Acquisition
fees and expenses
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
656
|
|
| |
|
|
4,712
|
|
|
1,438
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due
to CNL Securities Corp.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling
Commissions
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
Marketing
support fees and due diligence
expense
reimbursements
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
45
|
|
| |
|
|
848
|
|
|
194
|
|
| |
|
$
|
5,560
|
|
$
|
1,632
|
|
CNL
Capital Corp., an Affiliate of the Advisor, is a non-voting Class C member
of
Century Capital Markets, LLC ("CCM"). CCM made the arrangements for the
two
commercial paper loans totaling $43.9 million described in Note 10 to the
Notes
to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in
the
Financial Information commencing on page F-1. The monthly interest payments
due
under these commercial paper loans include an annual margin of either 40
or 30
basis points, payable to CCM for the monthly services it provides related
to the
administration of the commercial paper loans. For the quarters ended March
31,
2005 and 2004, $38,000 and $0, respectively, was paid to CCM related to
these
services.
We
maintain bank accounts in a bank in which certain of our officers and Directors
serve as directors and are majority stockholders. The amount deposited
with this
bank was $8.7 million at March 31, 2005.
We
own a
10% interest in a limited partnership that owns an office building located
in
Orlando, Florida, in which the Advisor and its Affiliates lease office
space.
The remaining interest in the limited partnership is owned by several Affiliates
of the Advisor. We severally guarantee 16.67%, or $2.6 million, of a $15.5
million uncollateralized promissory note of the limited partnership that
matures
on August 28, 2005. The limited partnership intends to extend the note;
however,
there can be no assurance that this objective will be met. If the note
is not
extended, it is likely that we will be required to contribute $2.3 million
to
the limited partnership to fund our 16.67% share of the outstanding note
balance
at maturity. We periodically receive distributions from the limited partnership,
however, no distributions were received during the quarters ended March
31, 2005
and 2004.
In
September 2004, a company which is owned by our Chairman of the Board sold
its
30% voting membership interest in a limited liability company which is
affiliated with the HRA Tenants to the remaining members of the limited
liability company. The HRA Tenants contributed 36% of our total revenues
for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004.
Our
Chairman of the Board is also a director in a hospital that leases office
space
in seven of our medical office buildings that were acquired in August 2004.
Additionally, one of our Independent Directors is a director in a health
system
that leases office space in one of our medical office buildings that was
acquired in April 2004. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, these
tenants
contributed less than 1% of our total revenues.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Allocation
of Purchase Price for Acquisition of Properties.
We
allocate the purchase costs of Properties to the tangible and intangible
assets
acquired and the liabilities assumed as provided by SFAS 141. For each
acquisition, we assess the value of the land, the as-if vacant building,
equipment and intangible assets, including in-place lease origination costs,
the
above or below market lease values and the value of customer relationships
based
on their estimated fair values. The values determined are based on independent
appraisals, discounted cash flow models and our estimates reflecting the
facts
and circumstances of each acquisition.
Acquisition
Fees and Costs.
Acquisition Fees and miscellaneous acquisition costs that are directly
identifiable with Properties that are probable of being acquired are capitalized
and included in other assets. Upon the purchase of a Property, the fees
and
costs directly identifiable with that Property are reclassified to land,
building, equipment and lease intangibles or to investment in direct financing
leases. In the event a Property is not acquired or no longer is expected
to be
acquired, costs directly related to the Property are charged to expense.
Leases.
Our
leases are accounted for under the provisions of Statement of Accounting
Standard No. 13, "Accounting for Leases," and have been accounted for as
either
operating leases or direct financing leases. This statement requires management
to estimate the economic life of the leased property, the residual value
of the
leased property and the present value of minimum lease payments to be received
from the tenant. In addition, we assume that all payments to be received
under
our leases are collectible. Changes in our estimates or assumptions regarding
collectibility of lease payments could result in a change in accounting
for the
lease.
Impairments.
We
evaluate our Properties and other long-lived assets on a quarterly basis,
or
upon the occurrence of significant changes in operations, to assess whether
any
impairment indications are present that affect the recovery of the carrying
amount of an individual asset by comparing the sum of expected undiscounted
cash
flows from the asset over its anticipated holding period, including the
asset's
estimated residual value, to the carrying value. If impairment is indicated,
a
loss is provided to reduce the carrying value of the property to its estimated
fair value.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts.
We
maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting
from
the inability of our tenants to make required rent payments. We base our
estimates on historical experience, projected cash flows generated from
the
tenants' operations of the Properties and various other assumptions that
we
believe to be reasonable under the circumstances of a specific Property
or
portfolio of Properties. If the financial condition of any of our tenants
deteriorates, resulting in the impairment of their ability to make required
rent
payments, additional allowances may be required.
Goodwill.
We
allocate the excess of the aggregate purchase price paid over the fair
market
value of the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in a
business
combination accounted for as a purchase to goodwill. Goodwill is not subject
to
amortization but is subject to quarterly impairment analysis. If quoted
market
prices are not available for our impairment analysis, we use other valuation
techniques that involve measurement based on projected net earnings of
the
underlying reporting unit.
STATEMENT
REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION
The
preceding information contains forward-looking statements within the meaning
of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E
of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are generally
characterized by the use of terms such as "believe," "intend," "expect"
and
"may." Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such
forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, our actual
results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking
statements. Certain factors that might cause such a difference include
the
following: changes in general economic conditions, changes in local and
national
real estate conditions, availability of capital from borrowings under our
line
of credit and availability of an on-going line of credit, continued availability
of proceeds from our equity offerings, our ability to obtain Permanent
Financing
on satisfactory terms, our ability to continue to locate suitable Properties,
and borrowers for our Mortgage Loans and Secured Equipment Leases, and
the
ability of tenants and borrowers to make payments under their respective
leases,
Mortgage Loans or Secured Equipment Leases. Given these uncertainties,
readers
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements.
MANAGEMENT
DIRECTORS
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The
following information updates and replaces the corresponding information
beginning on page 95 of the Prospectus.
The
following biography replaces the biography of Kimberly P. Ross on page
99 of the
Prospectus.
Lynn
Gutierrez,
age 52,
serves as Secretary of the Company. In addition, Ms.
Gutierrez serves
as
the Director of Regulatory Reporting for CNL Retirement Corp., the Advisor
to
the Company. Prior to joining CNL Retirement Corp., Ms. Gutierrez was the
manager of SEC reporting for CNL Investment Company, where she was responsible
for facilitating the preparation and filing of the Securities Act filings
for
CNL Retirement Properties, Inc. and other entities. Before joining CNL
in
November 1990, Ms. Gutierrez was a staff accountant for Coopers & Lybrand,
Certified Public Accountants. Ms. Gutierrez holds a B.S. in Accounting
from the
University of Central Florida and is a Certified Public Accountant in the
State
of Florida. In addition, she is a member of the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants and the Florida Institute of Certified Public
Accountants.
The
Company has entered into indemnification agreements with Clark Hettinga
and Lynn
Gutierrez effective as of December 31, 2004 and May 13, 2005,
respectively.
COMPENSATION
OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The
following paragraph updates and replaces the corresponding paragraph on
page 99
of the Prospectus.
Each
Director is entitled to receive $35,000 annually for serving on our Board
of
Directors, as well as a fee of $1,500 per board meeting attended (including
any
telephonic meeting) of the Board of Directors, or any committee of our
Board of
Directors at which such Director is present or in which the Director
participates by telephone. In addition, the Chairman of the Audit Committee
is
entitled to receive a retainer in the amount of $5,000 annually for serving
as
Chair, as well as a fee of $1,500 per meeting at which such Chairman is
present
or in which such Chairman participates by telephone with our independent
accountants as a representative of the Audit Committee. Directors that
are
members of a committee of our Board of Directors are entitled to receive
fees of
$1,500 per day for service as representatives of such committee in lieu
of the
above per meeting compensation (to the extent that such Directors devote
in
excess of three hours on such day to matters relating to such committee).
Our
Board of Directors, from time to time, may change the compensation to be
paid to
Directors in connection with service on our Board of Directors and any
committee
of our Board of Directors. We will not pay any compensation to our officers
and
Directors who also serve as officers and directors of our Advisor.
THE
ADVISOR AND THE ADVISORY AGREEMENT
THE
ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The
following paragraph is inserted following the third full paragraph on page
102
of the Prospectus.
On
May 2,
2005, we entered into the Renewal Agreement with the Advisor with respect
to
the Advisory Agreement, pursuant to which the Advisory Agreement
was
renewed for an additional one-year term commencing on May 3, 2005, and
ending
on May 3, 2006. The Renewal Agreement provides that we will negotiate
in
good faith with the Advisor with respect to whether a reduction in the
percentage rate(s) of Total Proceeds to be used in determining Acquisition
Fees
payable to the Advisor under the Advisory Agreement should be effected.
Pursuant
to the terms of the Renewal Agreement, we and the Advisor will use
commercially reasonable efforts to agree on any such reduction within sixty
days
of the date of the Renewal Agreement. In the event that we and the Advisor
agree
to any such reduction, the reduction will be deemed to be
effective as
of May 3, 2005. Acquisition Fees will be as agreed by us
and the
Advisor on a case-by-case basis as contemplated by the Advisory Agreement
and
our Articles of Amendment and Restatement until we and the Advisor have
agreed
on the percentage rate(s) of Total Proceeds to be used in determining
Acquisition Fees payable to the Advisor under the Advisory
Agreement.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The
following information should be read in conjunction with the "Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions" section beginning on page 103 of
the
Prospectus.
The
Managing Dealer is entitled to receive Selling Commissions amounting to
6.5% of
the total amount raised from the sale of Shares from this offering, up
to 6.0%
of which may be paid as commissions to other broker-dealers. However, Soliciting
Dealers that sell more than $50 million in Gross Proceeds in any fiscal
year may
be reallowed up to 6.2% with respect to Selling Commissions on the Shares
they
sell. During the period January 1, 2005 through May 25, 2005, we incurred
approximately $7.1 million of such fees in connection with this offering,
the
majority of which has been or will be paid by CNL Securities Corp. as
commissions to other broker-dealers.
The
Managing Dealer is entitled to receive a marketing support fee of 2.0%
of the
total amount raised from the sale of Shares from this offering, all or
a portion
of which may be reallowed to other broker-dealers who enter into an addendum
to
the Participating Broker Agreement with the Managing Dealer. During the
period
January 1, 2005 through May 25, 2005, we incurred approximately $2.4
million of
such
fees in connection with this offering, the majority of which has been or
will be
reallowed to other broker-dealers.
Pursuant
to the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is entitled to receive Acquisition
Fees
for services in making or investing in Mortgage Loans, or the purchase,
development, or construction of a Property or other Permitted Investment.
For
the period May 3, 2004 through May 3, 2005 the Advisor was entitled to
4.0% of
Gross Proceeds, loan proceeds from Permanent Financing and amounts outstanding
on the Line of Credit, if any, at the time of Listing, but excluding loan
proceeds used to finance Secured Equipment Leases. Pursuant to the Renewal
Agreement described above, we and the Advisor are currently in negotiations
with
respect to whether an Acquisition Fee reduction should be effected. Acquisition
Fees will be as agreed by us and the Advisor on a case-by-case basis as
contemplated by the Advisory Agreement and our Articles of Amendment and
Restatement until we and the Advisor have agreed on the percentage rate(s)
of
Total Proceeds to be used in determining Acquisition Fees payable to the
Advisor
under the Advisory Agreement. During the period January 1, 2005 through
May 25,
2005, we incurred approximately $4.8 million of such fees in connection
with
this offering. For the period January 1, 2005 through May 25, 2005, we
incurred
Acquisition Fees totaling approximately $10.8 million as a result of Permanent
Financing used to acquire certain Properties.
The
Company and the Advisor have entered into an Advisory Agreement pursuant
to
which the Advisor receives a monthly Asset Management Fee of 0.05% of the
Company's Real Estate Asset Value and the outstanding principal balance
of any
Mortgage Loans as of the end of the preceding month. The Asset Management
Fee,
which will not exceed fees which are competitive for similar services in
the
same geographic area, may or may not be taken, in whole or in part as to
any
year, in the sole discretion of the Advisor. All or any portion of the
Asset
Management Fee not taken as to any fiscal year shall be deferred without
interest and may be taken in such other fiscal year as the Advisor shall
determine. For the period January 1, 2005 through April 30, 2005, we incurred
approximately $6.1 million of such fees.
We
incur
operating expenses which, in general, are those expenses relating to
administration of the Company on an ongoing basis. Pursuant to the Advisory
Agreement described above, the Advisor is required to reimburse us the
amount by
which the total Operating Expenses paid or incurred by us exceed, in any
Expense
Year, the greater of 2% of Average Invested Assets or 25% of Net Income.
During
the Expense Year ended March 31, 2005, our Operating Expenses did not exceed
the
Expense Cap.
The
Advisor and its Affiliates provide various administrative services to us,
including services related to accounting; financial, tax and regulatory
compliance reporting; stockholder distributions and reporting; due diligence
and
marketing; and investor relations (including administrative services in
connection with the offering of Shares) on a day-to-day basis. For the
quarter
ended March 31, 2005, we incurred approximately $2.6 for these services,
approximately $0.6 representing stock issuance costs and approximately
$2.0
million in general operating and administrative expenses, including costs
related to preparing and distributing reports required by the Securities
and
Exchange Commission.
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2005, Affiliates of the Advisor incurred on
our
behalf $1.7 million for certain Offering Expenses.
We
maintain bank accounts in a bank in which certain officers and Directors
of ours
serve as directors and are majority stockholders. The amount deposited
with this
bank at March 31, 2005 was approximately $8.7 million. The terms and conditions
offered by this bank are similar and competitive with terms offered by
unrelated
banks.
CNL
Capital Corp., an affiliate of the Advisor, is a non-voting Class C member
of
Century Capital Markets, LLC ("CCM"). CCM made the arrangements for the
two
commercial paper loans totaling $43.9 million described in Note 10 to the
Notes
to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements commencing on page F-1.
The
monthly interest payments due under these commercial paper loans include
an
annual margin of either 40 or 30 basis points, payable to CCM for the monthly
services it provides related to the administration of the commercial paper
loans. For the quarter ended March 31, 2005, $38,000 was paid to CCM related
to
these services.
We
own a
10% interest in a limited partnership that owns an office building located
in
Orlando, Florida, in which the Advisor and its Affiliates lease office
space.
The remaining interest in the limited partnership is owned by several Affiliates
of the Advisor. We have severally guaranteed our 16.67% share, or $2.6
million,
of a $15.5 million unsecured promissory note of the limited partnership
that
matures on August 28, 2005. At March 31, 2005, the note had an outstanding
balance of $14.1 million. The limited partnership intends to extend the
term of
the note; however, there can be no assurance that this objective will be
met. If
the note is not extended it is likely that we will be required to contribute
$2.3 million to the limited partnership to fund our 16.67% share of the
outstanding note balance at maturity. We periodically receive distributions
from
the partnership; however, no distributions were received during the quarter
ended March 31, 2005.
In
September 2004, a company which is owned by our Chairman of the Board sold
its
30% voting membership interest in a limited liability company which is
affiliated with the HRA Tenants to the remaining members of the limited
liability company. The HRA Tenants contributed 36% of our total revenues
for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005.
Our
Chairman of the Board is a director in a hospital that leases office space
in
seven of our medical office buildings that were acquired in August 2004.
Additionally, one of our Independent Directors is a director in a health
system
that leases office space in one of our medical office buildings that was
acquired in April 2004. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, these
tenants
contributed less than 1% of our total revenues.
DISTRIBUTION
POLICY
DISTRIBUTIONS
The
following information updates and replaces the table and footnotes on page
114
of the Prospectus.
The
following table presents total Distributions declared (in thousands) and
Distributions per Share:
| |
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
| |
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
|
Year
|
|
|
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Distributions declared
|
|
$
|
42,593
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions
per Share
|
|
|
0.1776
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Distributions declared
|
|
$
|
28,841
|
|
$
|
37,344
|
|
$
|
39,755
|
|
$
|
41,216
|
|
$
|
147,156
|
|
|
Distributions
per Share
|
|
|
0.1776
|
|
|
0.1776
|
|
|
0.1776
|
|
|
0.1776
|
|
|
0.7104
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Distributions declared
|
|
$
|
8,689
|
|
$
|
12,031
|
|
$
|
16,591
|
|
$
|
22,473
|
|
$
|
59,784
|
|
|
Distributions
per Share
|
|
|
0.1767
|
|
|
0.1767
|
|
|
0.1767
|
|
|
0.1770
|
|
|
0.7071
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Distributions declared
|
|
$
|
1,552
|
|
$
|
2,587
|
|
$
|
4,097
|
|
$
|
6,143
|
|
$
|
14,379
|
|
|
Distributions
per Share
|
|
|
0.1749
|
|
|
0.1749
|
|
|
0.1749
|
|
|
0.1755
|
|
|
0.7002
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Distributions declared
|
|
$
|
220
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
$
|
727
|
|
$
|
1,507
|
|
|
Distributions
per Share
|
|
|
0.1749
|
|
|
0.1749
|
|
|
0.1749
|
|
|
0.1749
|
|
|
0.6996
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Distributions declared
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
$
|
502
|
|
|
Distributions
per Share
|
|
|
0.0750
|
|
|
0.1537
|
|
|
0.1749
|
|
|
0.1749
|
|
|
0.5785
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1999:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Distributions declared
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
Distributions
per Share
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
0.0500
|
|
|
0.0750
|
|
|
0.1250
|
|
| (1) |
In
April, May and June 2005, we declared Distributions totaling
$14.5
million, $14.7 million and $14.7 million, respectively (representing
$0.0592 per Share), payable by June 30,
2005.
|
| (2) |
For
the period December 22, 1997 (date of inception) through July
13, 1999, we
did not make any cash Distributions because operations had not
commenced.
|
| (3) |
For
the quarter ended March 31, 2005, the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003,
2002, 2001 and 2000, and the period July 13, 1999 (the
date our
operations commenced) through December 31, 1999, approximately
80%, 60%,
71%, 65%, 65%, 54% and 100%, respectively, of the Distributions
declared
and paid were considered to be ordinary income and approximately
20%, 40%,
29%, 35%, 35% , 46% and 0%, respectively, were considered a return
of
capital for federal income tax purposes. No amounts distributed
to
stockholders for the periods presented are required to be or
have been
treated by us as return of capital for purposes of calculating
the
Stockholders' 8% Return on Invested Capital. Due to the fact
that we had
not yet acquired all of our Properties and were still in the
offering
stage as of March 31, 2005, the characterization of Distributions
for
federal income tax purposes is not necessarily considered by
management to
be representative of the characterization of Distributions in
future
periods. In addition, the characterization for federal income
tax purposes
of Distributions declared for the quarter ended March 31, 2005,
may not be
indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended
December
31, 2005.
|
| (4) |
Cash
distributions are declared by the Board of Directors and generally
are
based on various factors, including cash available from operations.
For
the quarter ended March 31, 2005, and the years ended December
31, 2004,
2003, 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999, approximately 23%, 20%, 2%,
21%, 39%, 55%
and 100%, respectively, of cash distributions represent a return
of
capital in accordance with GAAP. Cash distributions treated as
a return of
capital on a GAAP basis represent the amount of cash distributions
in
excess of net earnings on a GAAP basis. The Company has not treated
such
amounts as a return of capital for purposes of calculating Invested
Capital and the Stockholders' 8%
Return.
|
| (5) |
Distributions declared and paid for the years
ended
December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000, represent a distribution
rate of 7.104%, 7.071%, 7%, 7% and 5.785%, respectively, of Invested
Capital. |
The
following paragraph updates and replaces the paragraph following footnote
paragraph (5) on page 115 of the Prospectus.
We
intend
to continue to make regular Distributions to stockholders. Distributions
will be
made to those stockholders who are stockholders as of the record date selected
by our Directors. Our Board of Directors currently declares Distributions
on a
monthly basis using the first day of the month as the record date. In order
for
an investor to receive a Distribution, they must be a stockholder of record
as
of the record date. Therefore, newly admitted investors, or investors redeeming
or transferring Shares, will not receive a Distribution for a record date
that
they are not considered a stockholder of record. Currently, Distributions
are
declared monthly and paid quarterly during the offering period. In addition,
Distributions are expected to be declared monthly and paid quarterly during
any
subsequent offering, and declared and paid quarterly thereafter. However,
in the
future, our Board of Directors, in its discretion, may determine to declare
Distributions on another basis. During the year ended December 31, 2004,
$7.7
million of Distributions paid to stockholders was supported by borrowings
on our
line of credit.
The
second, third and fourth paragraphs following footnote paragraph (5) on
page 115
of the Prospectus are deleted in their entirety.
EXPERTS
The
combined financial statements of Horizon Bay Senior Communities Twenty
Communities as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for each of the three
years in
the period ended December 31, 2003 included in the Prospectus have been
so
included in reliance on the reports of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent
registered certified public accounting firm, given on the authority of
said firm
as experts in auditing and accounting.