SEC Info - BGC Partners, Inc. - ‘10-Q’ for 9/30/17

Page	(sequential)		(alphabetic)	↑Top
		Alternative Formats (Word, et al.) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows-For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity-For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity-For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)-For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition-At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations-For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 Controls and Procedures Defaults Upon Senior Securities Exhibits Financial Statements (unaudited) Legal Proceedings Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Mine Safety Disclosures Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Other Information Part I-Financial Information Part Ii-Other Information Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Risk Factors Signatures Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
1	1st Page – Filing Submission
"	Part I-Financial Information
"	Financial Statements (unaudited)
"	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition-At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
"	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations-For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016
"	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)-For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016
"	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows-For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016
"	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity-For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
"	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity-For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
"	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
"	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
"	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
"	Controls and Procedures
"	Part Ii-Other Information
"	Legal Proceedings
"	Risk Factors
"	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
"	Defaults Upon Senior Securities
"	Mine Safety Disclosures
"	Other Information
"	Exhibits
"	Signatures

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ☒ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an “emerging growth company”. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No

On November 7, 2017, the registrant had 254,009,341 shares of Class A common stock, $0.01 par value, and 34,848,107 shares of Class B common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Form 10-Q”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which we refer to as the “Securities Act,” and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which we refer to as the “Exchange Act.” Such statements are based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. For example, words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “possible,” “potential,” “continue,” “strategy,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “intends,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

Our actual results and the outcome and timing of certain events may differ significantly from the expectations discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause or contribute to such a discrepancy include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth below and may impact either or both of our operating segments:

The foregoing risks and uncertainties, as well as those risks and uncertainties set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, may cause actual results and events to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. The information included herein is given as of the filing date of this Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and future results or events could differ significantly from these forward-looking statements. The Company does not undertake to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). You may read and copy any document we file at the SEC’s Public Reference Room located at One Station Place, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You can also request copies of the documents, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the Public Reference Room. These filings are also available to the public from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Our website address is www.bgcpartners.com. Through our website, we make available, free of charge, the following documents as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC: our Annual Reports on Form 10-K; our proxy statements for our annual and special stockholder meetings; our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q; our Current Reports on Form 8-K; Forms 3, 4 and 5 and Schedules 13D filed on behalf of Cantor, CF Group Management, Inc. (“CFGM”), our directors and our executive officers; and amendments to those documents. Our website also contains additional information with respect to our industry and business. The information contained on, or that may be accessed through, our website is not part of, and is not incorporated into, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

	September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	545,981		$	535,613
Cash segregated under regulatory requirements		139,962			57,822
Reverse repurchase agreements		—			54,659
Securities owned		32,121			35,357
Marketable securities		259,442			164,820
Loans held for sale		660,332			1,071,836
Receivables from broker-dealers, clearing organizations, customers and related broker-dealers		2,310,113			517,481
Mortgage servicing rights, net		386,135			339,816
Accrued commissions and other receivables, net		621,942			385,810
Loans, forgivable loans and other receivables from employees and partners, net		311,040			269,773
Fixed assets, net		185,604			167,239
Investments		137,993			33,439
Goodwill		926,784			863,881
Other intangible assets, net		312,861			253,163
Receivables from related parties		7,410			6,956
Other assets		415,649			289,921
Total assets	$	7,253,369		$	5,047,586
Liabilities, Redeemable Partnership Interest, and Equity
Short-term borrowings	$	6,313		$	—
Repurchase agreements		1,803			—
Securities loaned		135,070			—
Warehouse notes payable		659,732			257,969
Accrued compensation		424,255			383,407
Payables to broker-dealers, clearing organizations, customers and related broker-dealers		2,120,091			384,822
Payables to related parties		40,629			30,475
Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities		976,789			649,029
Long-term debt and collateralized borrowings		1,955,807			965,767
Notes payable to related parties		—			690,000
Total liabilities		6,320,489			3,361,469
Commitments and contingencies (Note 23)
Redeemable partnership interest		52,008			52,577
Equity
Stockholders’ equity:
Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 750,000 shares authorized; 301,294 and 292,549 shares issued at September 30, 2017 and December 31,2016, respectively; and 252,261 and 244,870 shares outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively		3,013			2,925
Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 150,000 shares authorized; 34,848 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, convertible into Class A common stock		348			348
Additional paid-in capital		1,634,890			1,662,615
Contingent Class A common stock		41,737			42,472
Treasury stock, at cost: 49,033 and 47,679 shares of Class A common stock at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively		(301,236	)		(288,743	)
Retained deficit		(686,130	)		(212,858	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(8,236	)		(23,199	)
Total stockholders’ equity		684,386			1,183,560
Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries		196,486			449,980
Total equity		880,872			1,633,540
Total liabilities, redeemable partnership interest, and equity	$	7,253,369		$	5,047,586

The accompanying Notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Revenues:
Commissions	$	582,106	$	492,808	$	1,704,998	$	1,465,293
Principal transactions		75,766		76,332		241,869		255,219
Gains from mortgage banking activities, net		45,455		65,377		164,263		139,009
Real estate management and other services		60,798		49,373		163,017		140,960
Servicing fees		29,057		22,502		80,729		62,199
Fees from related parties		7,173		6,354		20,129		19,086
Data, software and post-trade		13,776		13,266		40,185		41,360
Interest income		11,726		8,012		40,909		24,332
Other revenues		1,171		796		3,023		4,880
Total revenues		827,028		734,820		2,459,122		2,152,338
Expenses:
Compensation and employee benefits		495,145		439,384		1,438,129		1,306,749
Allocations of net income and grant of exchangeability to limited partnership units and FPUs		48,446		58,771		161,876		132,670
Total compensation and employee benefits		543,591		498,155		1,600,005		1,439,419
Occupancy and equipment		51,962		49,032		153,102		153,692
Fees to related parties		4,380		5,323		16,389		15,460
Professional and consulting fees		24,486		17,624		69,047		50,032
Communications		33,290		31,562		97,816		94,857
Selling and promotion		26,828		23,139		81,503		75,613
Commissions and floor brokerage		10,410		8,645		31,316		28,010
Interest expense		24,425		18,831		69,678		53,770
Other expenses		55,600		37,428		148,262		116,075
Total expenses		774,972		689,739		2,267,118		2,026,928
Other income (losses) , net:
Gain (loss) on divestiture and sale of investments		4		7,044		561		7,044
Gains (losses) on equity method investments		2,147		796		3,986		2,547
Other income (loss)		88,195		91,655		97,928		98,192
Total other income (losses), net		90,346		99,495		102,475		107,783
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes		142,402		144,576		294,479		233,193
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		31,854		30,273		55,084		45,718
Consolidated net income (loss)	$	110,548	$	114,303	$	239,395	$	187,475
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries		29,019		27,092		68,121		46,892
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	81,529	$	87,211	$	171,274	$	140,583
Per share data:
Basic earnings (loss) per share
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	81,529	$	87,211	$	171,274	$	140,583
Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	0.28	$	0.31	$	0.60	$	0.51
Basic weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding		288,308		278,601		286,200		276,144
Fully diluted earnings (loss) per share
Net income (loss) for fully diluted shares	$	127,495	$	132,157	$	266,001	$	216,027
Fully diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.28	$	0.31	$	0.59	$	0.50
Fully diluted weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding		457,341		429,761		451,348		434,713
Dividends declared per share of common stock	$	0.18	$	0.16	$	0.52	$	0.46
Dividends declared and paid per share of common stock	$	0.18	$	0.16	$	0.52	$	0.46

The accompanying Notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Consolidated net income (loss)	$	239,395		$	187,475
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Fixed asset depreciation and intangible asset amortization		61,201			58,121
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights, net		53,001			48,334
Employee loan amortization and reserves on employee loans		43,227			46,003
Equity-based compensation and allocations of net income to limited partnership units and FPUs		185,135			150,023
Deferred compensation expense		7,265			14,318
Gain on originated mortgage servicing rights		(98,814	)		(92,555	)
Unrealized losses (gains) on loans held for sale		(507	)		(2,277	)
Losses (gains) on equity method investments		(3,986	)		(2,547	)
Amortization of discount (premium) on notes payable		(1,912	)		(1,465	)
Unrealized (gain) loss on marketable securities		(23,038	)		(973	)
Impairment of fixed assets, intangible assets and equity method investments		8,499			3,738
Deferred tax provision (benefit)		2,263			(57,915	)
Sublease provision adjustment		—			(807	)
Recognition of earn-out		(76,969	)		(67,016	)
Realized losses (gains) on marketable securities		(1,222	)		(11,792	)
Change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables		5,946			(15,822	)
Loss (gains) on sale of cost method investment		—			(7,051	)
Forfeitures of Class A common stock		(672	)		(374	)
Other		(557	)		(453	)
Consolidated net income (loss), adjusted for non-cash and non-operating items		398,255			246,965
Decrease (increase) in operating assets:
Cash segregated under regulatory requirements		3,106			(7,017	)
Reverse repurchase agreements		54,659			—
Securities owned		3,236			(179,695	)
Loans held for sale, net		412,011			(235,811	)
Receivables from broker-dealers, clearing organizations, customers and related broker-dealers		(1,789,576	)		(950,964	)
Mortgage servicing rights, net		(506	)		(5,844	)
Accrued commissions and other receivables, net		(99,138	)		(19,632	)
Loans, forgivable loans and other receivables from employees and partners, net		(82,549	)		(142,409	)
Receivables from related parties		(3,566	)		7,136
Other assets		(17,586	)		8,200
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
Securities loaned		135,070			(117,967	)
Repurchase agreements		1,803		—
Accrued compensation		(37,275	)		(32,716	)
Payables to broker-dealers, clearing organizations, customers and related broker-dealers		1,731,395			900,528
Payables to related parties		(6,493	)		(991	)
Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities		81,660			81,260
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	784,506		$	(448,957	)

The accompanying Notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of fixed assets	$	(28,998	)	$	(37,646	)
Capitalization of software development costs		(27,841	)		(17,595	)
Purchase of equity method investments		(101,623	)		(1,112	)
Proceeds from equity method investments		243			—
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired		(99,999	)		(119,212	)
Advances to related party		(375,000	)		(175,000	)
Repayments from related party		375,000			175,000
Proceeds from divestitures, net		—			150
Purchase of marketable securities		—			(68,396	)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities		7,849			618,090
Proceeds from sale of cost method investments		—			7,106
Capitalization of trademarks, patent defense and registration costs		(295	)		(420	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	$	(250,664	)	$	380,965

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayments of collateralized borrowings	$	(7,060	)	$	(5,121	)
Repayments of convertible notes	—				(159,932	)
Issuance of senior notes, net of deferred issuance costs		—			295,768
Issuance of long-term debt and collateralized borrowings, net of deferred issuance costs		998,817			(1,066	)
Proceeds from warehouse notes payable		7,314,793			5,503,899
Repayments on warehouse notes payable		(6,913,030	)		(5,673,614	)
Advances from related party		291,000			770,000
Repayments to related party		(981,000	)		(449,000	)
Earnings distributions		(89,537	)		(60,629	)
Redemption and repurchase of limited partnership interests		(34,113	)		(27,664	)
Dividends to stockholders		(148,094	)		(126,318	)
Repurchase of Class A common stock		(14,557	)		(72,700	)
Cancellation of restricted stock units in satisfaction of withholding tax requirements		(52	)		(1,542	)
Proceeds from issuance of Class A common stock, net of costs		—			15,280
Deemed contribution due to acquisition of Lucera		—			10,145
Acquisition of Berkeley Point		(871,814	)	—
Pre-acquisition distribution from Berkeley Point to CCRE		(66,782	)	—
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		—			86
Proceeds from short-term borrowings		6,313			—
Payments on acquisitions earn-outs		(12,211	)		(6,151	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(527,327	)		11,441
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		3,853			2,954
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		10,368			(53,597	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		535,613			563,028
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	545,981		$	509,431
Supplemental cash information:
Cash paid during the period for taxes		32,136			55,263
Cash paid during the period for interest		68,331			54,146
Supplemental non-cash information:
Issuance of Class A common stock upon exchange of limited partnership interests	$	74,013		$	53,754
Issuance of Class A and contingent Class A common stock and limited partnership interests for acquisitions		14,232			5,857
Issuance of Class A common stock upon conversion of convertible notes		—			68
Distribution from Berkeley Point to CCRE	$	2,993		$	—

The accompanying Notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

	BGC Partners, Inc. Stockholders
	Class A Common Stock		Class B Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Contingent Class A Common Stock			Treasury Stock			Retained Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Noncontrolling Interest in Subsidiaries			Total
Balance, January 1, 2016	$	2,559	$	348	$	1,305,029		$	50,095		$	(212,331	)	$	(226,672	)	$	(25,056	)	$	692,563		$	1,586,535
Consolidated net income (loss)		—		—		—			—			—			185,022			—			68,816			253,838
Other comprehensive gain, net of tax		—		—		—			—			—			—			1,857			(733	)		1,124
Equity-based compensation, 637,719 shares		6		—		2,999			—			—			—			—			1,563			4,568
Dividends to common stockholders		—		—		—			—			—			(170,795	)		—			—			(170,795	)
Earnings distributions to limited partnership interests and other noncontrolling interests		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(62,258	)		(62,258	)
Grant of exchangeability and redemption of limited partnership interests, issuance of 8,705,906 shares		87		—		58,751			—			—			—			—			36,844			95,682
Issuance of Class A common stock (net of costs), 2,004,533 shares		20		—		14,216			—			—			—			—			3,542			17,778
Redemption of FPUs, 460,690 units		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(2,307	)		(2,307	)
Repurchase of Class A common stock, 10,823,942 shares		—		—		—			—			(75,984	)		—			—			(20,194	)		(96,178	)
Forfeitures of restricted Class A common stock, 59,317 shares		—		—		132			—			(428	)		—			—			(78	)		(374	)
Cantor purchase of Cantor units from BGC Holdings upon redemption of founding/working partners units, 624,762 units		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			2,357			2,357
Issuance of Class A common stock for acquisitions, 1,853,259 shares		18		—		15,683			(9,301	)		—			—			—			1,728			8,128
Issuance of contingent shares and limited partnership interests in connection with acquisitions		—		—		8,425			1,678			—			—			—			2,699			12,802
Acquisition of Lucera		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(29,037	)		(29,037	)
Deemed contribution due to acquisition of Lucera		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			15,005			15,005
Conversion of 4.50% Convertible Notes to Class A common stock, 6,909 shares		—		—		54			—			—			—			—			14			68
Completion of GFI Back-End Mergers and Issuance of Class A common stock, 23,481,192 shares		235		—		258,440			—			—			—			—			(258,691	)		(16	)
Purchase of Newmark noncontrolling interest		—		—		(451	)		—			—			—			—			(1,608	)		(2,059	)
Purchase of ELX noncontrolling interest		—		—		(11	)		—			—			—			—			(3	)		(14	)
Other		—		—		(652	)		—			—			(413	)		—			(242	)		(1,307	)
Balance, December 31, 2016	$	2,925	$	348	$	1,662,615		$	42,472		$	(288,743	)	$	(212,858	)	$	(23,199	)	$	449,980		$	1,633,540

The accompanying Notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

	BGC Partners, Inc. Stockholders
	Class A Common Stock		Class B Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Contingent Class A Common Stock			Treasury Stock			Retained Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Noncontrolling Interest in Subsidiaries			Total
Balance, January 1, 2017	$	2,925	$	348	$	1,662,615		$	42,472		$	(288,743	)	$	(212,858	)	$	(23,199	)	$	449,980		$	1,633,540
Consolidated net income (loss)	—			—		—			—			—			171,274			—			68,121			239,395
Other comprehensive gain, net of tax		—		—		—			—			—			—			14,963			2,371			17,334
Equity-based compensation, 479,313 shares		5		—		2,667			—			—			—			—			1,517			4,189
Dividends to common stockholders		—		—		—			—			—			(148,094	)		—			—			(148,094	)
Earnings distributions to limited partnership interests and other noncontrolling interests		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(100,365	)		(100,365	)
Grant of exchangeability and redemption of limited partnership interests, issuance of 6,795,187 shares		68		—		53,848			—			—			—			—			33,111			87,027
Issuance of Class A common stock (net of costs), 45,490 shares		—		—		430			—			—			—			—			118			548
Redemption of FPUs, 715,094 units		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(5,820	)		(5,820	)
Repurchase of Class A common stock, 1,246,365 shares		—		—		—			—			(11,432	)		—			—			(3,125	)		(14,557	)
Forfeitures of restricted Class A common stock, 106,849 shares		—		—		534			—			(1,061	)		—			—			(145	)		(672	)
Issuance of Class A common stock for acquisitions, 1,424,690 shares		15		—		6,776			(4,696	)		—			—			—			567			2,662
Issuance of contingent shares and limited partnership interests in connection with acquisitions		—		—		5,121			3,961			—			—			—			2,488			11,570
Pre-acquisition distribution from Berkeley Point to CCRE															(54,758	)					(15,017	)		(69,775	)
Acquisition of Berkeley Point	—		—			(96,927	)	—			—				(441,386	)	—				(237,586	)		(775,899	)
Purchase of Newmark noncontrolling interest		—		—		(175	)		—			—			—			—			(1,140	)		(1,315	)
Other		—		—		1			—			—			(308	)		—			1,411			1,104
Balance, September 30, 2017	$	3,013	$	348	$	1,634,890		$	41,737		$	(301,236	)	$	(686,130	)	$	(8,236	)	$	196,486		$	880,872

The accompanying Notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

BGC Partners, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “BGC Partners,” “BGC” or the “Company”) is a leading global brokerage company servicing the financial and real estate markets through its two segments, Financial Services and Real Estate Services. Through the Company’s financial service brands, including BGC, GFI, Sunrise, Besso and R.P. Martin among others, the Company’s Financial Services segment specializes in the brokerage of a broad range of products, including fixed income (rates and credit), foreign exchange, equities, energy and commodities, insurance, and futures. It also provides a wide range of services, including trade execution, broker-dealer services, clearing, trade compression, post trade, information, and other back-office services to a broad range of financial and non-financial institutions. BGC Partners’ integrated platform is designed to provide flexibility to customers with regard to price discovery, execution and processing of transactions, and enables them to use voice, hybrid, or in many markets, fully electronic brokerage services in connection with transactions executed either over-the-counter (“OTC”) or through an exchange. Through the Company’s electronic brands including FENICS, BGC Trader, BGC Market Data, Capitalab and Lucera, BGC Partners offers fully electronic brokerage, financial technology solutions, market data, post-trade services and analytics related to financial instruments and markets.

Newmark Knight Frank (which may be referred to as “Newmark” or “NKF”) is a leading commercial real estate services firm. Newmark offers a full suite of services and products for both owners and occupiers across the entire commercial real estate industry. Our investor/owner services and products include capital markets, which consists of investment sales, debt and structured finance and loan sales, agency leasing, property management, valuation and advisory, diligence and underwriting and government sponsored entity (“GSE”) lending and loan servicing. Newmark’s occupier services and products include tenant representation, real estate management technology systems, workplace and occupancy strategy, global corporate consulting, project management, lease administration and facilities management. Newmark enhances these services and products through innovative real estate technology solutions and data analytics that enable our clients to increase their efficiency and profits. Newmark has relationships with many of the world’s largest commercial property owners, real estate developers and investors, as well as Fortune 500 and Forbes Global 2000 companies.

On January 12, 2016, the Company, Jersey Partners, Inc. (“JPI”), New JP Inc. (“New JPI”), Michael A. Gooch, Colin Heffron, and certain subsidiaries of JPI and the Company closed on a previously agreed upon merger. This merger provided for the acquisition of JPI by BGC (the “JPI Merger”) as provided for by a merger agreement dated December 22, 2015. Shortly following the completion of the JPI Merger, a subsidiary of the Company merged with and into GFI Group Inc. (“GFI”) pursuant to a short-form merger under Delaware law, with GFI continuing as the surviving entity (the “GFI Merger” and, together with the JPI Merger, the “Back-End Mergers”). The Back-End Mergers allowed the Company to acquire the remaining approximately 33% of the outstanding shares of GFI common stock that it did not already own. Following the closing of the Back-End Mergers, the Company and its affiliates now own 100% of the outstanding shares of GFI’s common stock.

On September 8, 2017, the Company and one of our operating partnerships, BGC Partners, L.P., closed (the “Closing”) on the acquisition of Berkeley Point Financial LLC (“Berkeley Point”) pursuant to a Transaction Agreement, dated as of July 17, 2017, with Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. (“Cantor”) and certain of Cantor’s affiliates, including Cantor Commercial Real Estate Company, L.P. (“CCRE”) and Cantor Commercial Real Estate Sponsor, L.P., the general partner of CCRE. Berkeley Point is a leading commercial real estate finance company focused on the origination and sale of multifamily and other commercial real estate loans through government-sponsored and government-funded loan programs, as well as the servicing of commercial real estate loans. At the Closing, the Company purchased and acquired from CCRE all of the outstanding membership interests of Berkeley Point, a wholly owned subsidiary of CCRE, for an acquisition price of $875.0 million, subject to a post-closing upward or downward adjustment to the extent that the net assets of Berkeley Point as of the Closing were greater than or less than $508.6 million, (the “Berkeley Point Acquisition”). BGC paid $3.2 million of the $875.0 million acquisition price with 247,099 limited partnership units of BGC Holdings, L.P. (“BGC Holdings”), which may be exchanged over time for shares of Class A common stock of the Company, with each BGC Holdings unit valued for these purposes at the volume weighted-average price of a share of Class A common stock for the three trading days prior to the Closing. The Berkeley Point Acquisition did not include the Special Asset Servicing Group of Berkeley Point; however, Berkeley Point will continue to hold the Special Asset Servicing Group’s assets until the servicing group is transferred to CCRE at a later date in a separate transaction. Accordingly, CCRE will continue to bear the benefits and burdens of the Special Asset Servicing Group from and after the Closing (the “Special Asset Servicing Arrangement”).

Also, on September 8, 2017, the Company invested $100 million in a newly formed commercial real estate-related financial and investment business, CF Real Estate Finance Holdings, L.P. (“Real Estate LP”), which is controlled and managed by Cantor. Real Estate LP may conduct activities in any real estate related business or asset backed securities-related business or any extensions thereof and ancillary activities thereto. As of September 30, 2017, the Company’s investment is accounted for under the equity method.

The Company’s customers include many of the world’s largest banks, broker-dealers, investment banks, trading firms, hedge funds, governments, corporations, property owners, real estate developers and investment firms. BGC Partners has more than 100 offices globally in major markets including New York and London, as well as in Atlanta, Beijing, Bogotá, Boston, Buenos Aires, Charlotte, Chicago, Copenhagen, Dallas, Denver, Dubai, Dublin, Geneva, Hong Kong, Houston, Istanbul, Johannesburg, Los Angeles, Madrid, Mexico City, Miami, Moscow, Nyon, Paris, Philadelphia, Rio de Janeiro, San Francisco, Santa Clara, Santiago, São Paulo, Seoul, Shanghai, Singapore, Sydney, Tel Aviv, Tokyo, Toronto, and Washington, D.C.

The Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”). The Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the Company’s accounts and all subsidiaries in which the Company has a controlling interest. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications have been made to previously reported amounts to conform to the current presentation.

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company changed the line item formerly known as “Market data and software solutions” to “Data, software and post-trade” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. In addition, as of December 31, 2016, the Company changed the line item formerly known as “Accrued commissions receivable, net” to “Accrued commissions and other receivables, net” in the Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition. Reclassifications have been made to previously reported amounts to conform to the current presentation.

On November 4, 2016, the Company acquired from Cantor the 80% of the Lucera business (also known as “LFI Holdings, LLC” or “LFI”) not already owned by the Company. Lucera is a technology infrastructure provider tailored to the financial sector headquartered in New York. This transaction has been determined to be a combination of entities under common control that resulted in a change in the reporting entity. Accordingly, the financial results of the Company have been recast to include the financial results of Lucera in the current and prior periods as if Lucera had always been consolidated. The updated financial results of the Company are reflected in Part II, Items 7 and 8 of our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In addition, the Berkeley Point Acquisition has been determined to be a combination of entities under common control that resulted in a change in the reporting entity. Accordingly, the financial results of the Company have been recast to include the financial results of Berkeley Point in the current and prior periods as if Berkeley Point had always been consolidated.

The following tables summarize the impact of the Berkeley Point Acquisition to the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statement of financial condition as of December 31, 2016, and to the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Additionally, the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows and unaudited condensed consolidated statements of changes in equity have been adjusted to reflect these retrospective adjustments.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all normal and recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition, the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations, the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows and the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of changes in equity of the Company for the periods presented.

In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern, which relates to disclosure of uncertainties about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. This ASU provides additional guidance on management’s responsibility to evaluate the condition of an entity and the required disclosures based on this assessment. This guidance was effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not impact the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. The amendment eliminates the deferral of certain consolidation standards for entities considered to be investment companies and modifies the consolidation analysis performed on certain types of legal entities. The guidance was effective beginning January 1, 2016 and early adoption was permitted. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest, which relates to simplifying the presentation of debt issuance costs. This ASU requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The amendments in this update were effective for the Company for the annual period beginning January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments. This ASU requires adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period of a business combination to be recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. Acquirers are no longer required to revise comparative information for prior periods as if the accounting for the business combination had been completed as of the acquisition date. The guidance was effective beginning January 1, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification of related amounts within the statement of cash flows. The new standard was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2017, and early adoption was permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which relates to how an entity recognizes the revenue it expects to be entitled to for the transfer of promised goods and services to customers. The ASU will replace certain existing revenue recognition guidance. The guidance, as stated in ASU No. 2014-09, was initially effective beginning on January 1, 2017. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers—Deferral of Effective Date, which defers the effective date by one year, with early adoption permitted on the original effective date. The guidance in ASU 2014-09 permits the use of either the full retrospective or modified retrospective transition method. The FASB has subsequently issued several additional amendments to the standard, including ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), which clarifies the guidance on principal versus agent analysis based on the notion of control and affects recognition of revenue on a gross or net basis. The amendment has the same effective date and transition requirements as the new standard. Management continues to evaluate the overall impact the guidance will have on the Company’s financial statements and related disclosures, as well as the method of adoption. The Company currently believes that the most significant impact of this standard on its accounting will be in its Real Estate Services segment, where revenue recognition is currently deferred when future contingencies exist. Based on the Company’s ongoing assessment, the adoption of the new revenue recognition guidance will likely result in an acceleration of certain Real Estate segment revenues that are based, in part, on future contingent events. For example, certain brokerage revenues from leasing commissions will be recognized earlier. Under current U.S. GAAP, a portion of these commissions is deferred until a future contingency is resolved (e.g., tenant move-in or payment of first month’s rent). Under the new revenue recognition model, the Company’s performance obligation will be typically satisfied at lease signing and, therefore, the portion of the commission that is contingent on a future event will likely be recognized earlier, if deemed not subject to significant reversal.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This ASU requires entities to measure equity investments that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted for under the equity method at fair value and recognize any changes in fair value in net income (loss) unless the investments qualify for the new measurement alternative. Entities will also have to record changes in instrument-specific credit risk for financial liabilities measured under the fair value option in other comprehensive income (loss). In addition, entities will be required to present enhanced disclosures of financial assets and financial liabilities. The guidance is effective beginning January 1, 2018, with early adoption of certain provisions of the ASU permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This standard requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for all leases with terms of more than 12 months. Recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses will depend on classification as a finance or operating lease. The amendments also require certain quantitative and qualitative disclosures. Accounting guidance for lessors is largely unchanged. The guidance is effective beginning January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326)—Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which requires financial assets that are measured at amortized cost to be presented, net of an allowance for credit losses, at the amount expected to be collected over their estimated life. Expected credit losses for newly recognized financial assets, as well as changes to credit losses during the period, are recognized in earnings. For certain purchased financial assets with deterioration in credit quality since origination, the initial allowance for expected credit losses will be recorded as an increase to the purchase price. Expected credit losses, including losses on off-balance-sheet exposures such as lending commitments, will be measured based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. The new standard will become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020, under a

modified retrospective approach, and early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)—Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which makes changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The new standard will become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018 and will require adoption on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)—Restricted Cash, which requires that the statement of cash flows present the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. The new standard will become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018 and will require adoption on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of providing additional guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The new standard will become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018 and will be applied on a prospective basis. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which eliminates the requirement to determine the fair value of individual assets and liabilities of a reporting unit to measure goodwill impairment. Under the amendments in the new ASU, goodwill impairment testing will be performed by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognizing an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The new standard will become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020 and will be applied on a prospective basis, and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this FASB guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05, Other Income—Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets, which clarifies the scope and application of Accounting Standards Codification 610-20, Other Income—Gains and Losses from Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets and defines in substance nonfinancial assets. The ASU will also impact the accounting for partial sales of nonfinancial assets (including in substance real estate). Under this guidance, when an entity transfers its controlling interest in a nonfinancial asset but retains a noncontrolling ownership interest, the entity will measure the retained interest at fair value, which will result in a full gain or loss recognition upon the sale of a controlling interest in a nonfinancial asset. The standard has the same effective date as the new revenue guidance, which is January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted beginning January 1, 2017. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting, which amends the scope of modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements and provides guidance on the types of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards to which an entity would be required to apply modification accounting. Under this guidance, an entity would not apply modification accounting if the fair value, the vesting conditions, and the classification of the awards (as equity or liability) are the same immediately before and after the modification. The new standard will become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and will be applied on a prospective basis for awards modified on or after the adoption date. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The guidance intends to better align an entity’s risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results. To meet that objective, the amendments expand and refine hedge accounting for both nonfinancial and financial risk components and align the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item in the financial statements. The new standard will become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted, and will be applied on a prospective basis and modified retrospective basis. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

The Company is a holding company with no direct operations and conducts substantially all of its operations through its operating subsidiaries. Virtually all of the Company’s consolidated net assets and net income are those of consolidated variable interest entities. BGC Holdings, L.P. (“BGC Holdings”) is a consolidated subsidiary of the Company for which the Company is the general partner. The Company and BGC Holdings jointly own BGC Partners, L.P. (“BGC US”) and BGC Global Holdings L.P. (“BGC Global”), the two operating partnerships. Listed below are the limited partnership interests in BGC Holdings. The founding/working partner units, limited partnership units and limited partnership interests held by Cantor (“Cantor units”), each as described below, collectively represent all of the “limited partnership interests” in BGC Holdings.

Founding/working partners have a limited partnership interest in BGC Holdings. The Company accounts for founding/working partner units (“FPUs”) outside of permanent capital, as “Redeemable partnership interest,” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. This classification is applicable to founding/working partner units because these units are redeemable upon termination of a partner, including a termination of employment, which can be at the option of the partner and not within the control of the issuer.

Founding/working partner units are held by limited partners who are employees and generally receive quarterly allocations of net income. Upon termination of employment or otherwise ceasing to provide substantive services, the founding/working partner units are generally redeemed, and the unit holders are no longer entitled to participate in the quarterly allocations of net income. Since these allocations of net income are cash distributed on a quarterly basis and are contingent upon services being provided by the unit holder, they are reflected as a component of compensation expense under “Allocations of net income and grant of exchangeability to limited partnership units and FPUs” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Certain employees hold limited partnership interests in BGC Holdings (e.g., REUs, RPUs, PSUs, PSIs and LPUs, collectively the “limited partnership units”). Generally, such units receive quarterly allocations of net income, which are cash distributed and generally are contingent upon services being provided by the unit holders. As prescribed in FASB guidance, the quarterly allocations of net income on such limited partnership units are reflected as a component of compensation expense under “Allocations of net income and grant of exchangeability to limited partnership units and FPUs” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. From time to time, the Company issues limited partnership units as part of the consideration for acquisitions.

Certain of these limited partnership units entitle the holders to receive post-termination payments equal to the notional amount of the units in four equal yearly installments after the holder’s termination. These limited partnership units are accounted for as post-termination liability awards, and in accordance with FASB guidance, the Company records compensation expense for the awards based on the change in value at each reporting date in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations as part of “Compensation and employee benefits.”

The Company has also awarded certain preferred partnership units (“Preferred Units”). Each quarter, the net profits of BGC Holdings are allocated to such units at a rate of either 0.6875% (which is 2.75% per calendar year) or such other amount as set forth in the award documentation (the “Preferred Distribution”). These allocations are deducted before the calculation and distribution of the quarterly partnership distribution for the remaining partnership units and are generally contingent upon services being provided by the unit holder. The Preferred Units are not entitled to participate in partnership distributions other than with respect to the Preferred Distribution. Preferred Units may not be made exchangeable into the Company’s Class A common stock and are only entitled to the Preferred Distribution, and accordingly they are not included in the Company’s fully diluted share count. The quarterly allocations of net income on Preferred Units are reflected in compensation expense under “Allocations of net income and grant of exchangeability to limited partnership units and FPUs” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. After deduction of the Preferred Distribution, the remaining partnership units generally receive quarterly allocations of net income based on their weighted-average pro rata share of economic ownership of the operating subsidiaries.

Cantor units are reflected as a component of “Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. Cantor receives allocations of net income (loss), which are cash distributed on a quarterly basis and are reflected as a component of “Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Certain of the limited partnership interests, described above, have been granted exchangeability into Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis (subject to adjustment); additional limited partnership interests may become exchangeable for Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis (subject to adjustment). Because they are included in the Company’s fully diluted share count, if dilutive, any exchange of limited partnership interests into Class A common shares would not impact the fully diluted number of shares and units outstanding. Because these limited partnership interests generally receive quarterly allocations of net income, such exchange would have no significant impact on the cash flows or equity of the Company. Each quarter, net income (loss) is allocated between the limited partnership interests and the common stockholders. In quarterly periods in which the Company has a net loss, the loss allocation for FPUs, limited partnership units and Cantor units is allocated to Cantor and reflected as a component of “Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. In subsequent quarters in which the Company has net income, the initial allocation of income to the limited partnership interests is to “Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries,” to recover any losses taken in earlier quarters, with the remaining income allocated to the limited partnership interests. This income (loss) allocation process has no impact on the net income (loss) allocated to common stockholders.

In connection with the Berkeley Point Acquisition, the Company has adopted and made additions to the following significant accounting policies.

BGC Partners derives its revenues primarily through commissions from brokerage services, the spread between the buy and sell prices on matched principal transactions, gains from mortgage banking activities, revenues from real estate management and other services, servicing fees, fees from related parties, data, software and post-trade services, and other revenues. The following revenues are related to the Berkeley Point Acquisition:

Gains from mortgage banking activities, net are recognized when a derivative asset or liability is recorded upon the commitment to originate a loan with a borrower and sell the loan to an investor. The derivative is recorded at fair value and includes loan origination fees, sales premiums and the estimated fair value of the expected net servicing cash flows. Gains from mortgage banking activities, net are recognized net of related fees and commissions to affiliates or third party brokers. For loans the Company brokers, gains from mortgage banking activities are recognized when the loan is closed.

Servicing fees are earned for servicing mortgage loans and are recognized on an accrual basis over the lives of the related mortgage loans. Also included in servicing fees, are the fees earned on borrower prepayments, interest and placement fees on borrowers’ escrow accounts and other ancillary fees.

Cash segregated under regulatory requirements represents funds received in connection with customer activities that the Company is obligated to segregate or set aside to comply with regulations mandated by authorities such as the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority in the U.S. (“FINRA”) and the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) in the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) that have been promulgated to protect customer assets. In addition, this item includes cash set aside for amounts pledged for the benefit of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to secure the Company’s financial guarantee liability.

U.S. GAAP defines fair value as the price received to transfer an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and further expands disclosures about such fair value measurements.

The guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1

measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 measurements – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2 measurements – Quoted prices in markets that are not active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 measurements – Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

In determining fair value, the Company separates financial instruments owned and financial instruments sold, but not yet purchased into two categories: cash instruments and derivative contracts.

Cash Instruments – Cash instruments are generally classified within Level 1 or Level 2. The types of instruments generally classified within Level 1 include most U.S. government securities, certain sovereign government obligations, and actively traded listed equities. The Company does not adjust the quoted price for such instruments. The types of instruments generally classified within Level 2 include agency securities, most investment-grade and high-yield corporate bonds, certain sovereign government obligations, money market securities, and less liquid listed equities, state, municipal and provincial obligations.

Derivative Contracts – Derivative contracts can be exchange-traded or OTC. Exchange-traded derivatives typically fall within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether they are deemed to be actively traded or not. The Company generally values exchange-traded derivatives using the closing price of the exchange-traded derivatives. OTC derivatives are valued using market transactions and other market evidence whenever possible, including market-based inputs to models, broker or dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. For OTC derivatives that trade in liquid markets, such as generic forwards, swaps and options, model inputs can generally be verified and model selection does not involve significant management judgment. Such instruments are typically classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into contractual commitments to originate and sell loans at fixed prices with fixed expiration dates. The commitments become effective when the borrowers lock their interest rate within frames established by the Company (rate lock commitments). Borrowers are evaluated for creditworthiness prior to this commitment. Market risk arises if interest rates move adversely between the time of the rate lock by the borrower and the date the loan is sold to an investor.

To mitigate the effect of the interest rate risk inherent in providing rate lock commitments to borrowers, the Company enters into a sale commitment with an investor simultaneously with the rate lock commitment entered into with the borrower (forward sale contracts). The sale contract with the investor locks in an interest rate and price for the sale of the loan. The terms of the contract with the investor and the rate lock with the borrower are matched in substantially all respects, with the objective of eliminating interest rate risk to the extent practical. Sale commitments with the investors have an expiration date that is longer than our related commitments to the borrower to allow, among other things, for the closing of the loan and processing of paperwork to deliver the loan into the sale commitment.

Both the rate lock commitments to borrowers and the forward sale contracts to investors are derivatives and, accordingly, are marked to fair value through our consolidated statements of operations. These derivative contracts are valued by the Company using pricing models which entail unobservable inputs, which are significant to the fair value measurement of the derivative contracts. Accordingly, the rate lock commitments and forward sale contracts are generally classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of these derivative contracts and the related inputs include:

The fair value of the Company’s forward sale contracts to investors considers the effects of interest rate movements and the market price movement of the same type of security, between the trade date and the balance sheet date. The market price changes are multiplied by the notional amount of the forward sales contracts to measure the fair value.

The gain/loss of the expected loan sale to the investor, considers the amount that the Company has discounted the price to the borrower from par for competitive reasons, if at all, and the expected net cash flows from servicing to be received upon sale of the loan. The fair value of the expected net future cash flows associated with servicing the loan is calculated pursuant to the valuation techniques described in Note 16— “Mortgage servicing rights, net.”

To calculate the effects of interest rate movements, the Company uses applicable U.S. Treasury prices, and multiplies the price movement between the rate lock date and the balance sheet date by the notional loan commitment amount.

The fair value of the Company’s rate lock commitments and forward sale contracts is adjusted to reflect the risk that the agreement will not be fulfilled. The Company’s exposure to nonperformance in rate lock and forward sale contracts is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. Given the credit quality of our counterparties, the short duration of rate lock commitments and forward sale contracts, and the Company’s historical experience with the agreements, management does not believe the risk of nonperformance by the Company’s counterparties to be significant.

Loans held for sale – Loans held for sale are included in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Loans are classified as Level 2 when the Company enters into an agreement to sell funded loans to third party investors at an observable price. The loans are collateralized by a single commercial real estate property or a portfolio of properties. The fair value of the Company’s Loans held for sale include the gain/loss for pricing discounts, the expected net future cash flows, and the effect of interest rate movements, as described above under Derivative contracts for rate lock commitments and forward sale contracts.

See Note 13— “Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities,” for more information on the fair value of financial assets and liabilities.

The Company distributes its commercial mortgage loans primarily through the government sponsored enterprises’ (“GSEs”) distribution channel which generally involves (a) Freddie Mac purchasing the Company’s loan for cash, (b) Fannie Mae securitizing the Company’s loan into a mortgage-backed security (“MBS”) guaranteed by Fannie Mae and the Company selling the MBS to a third party for cash, or (c) Federal Housing Authority (“FHA”) guaranteeing the credit risk of the Company’s loan, the Company issuing a Ginnie Mae MBS collateralized by the loan, and the Company selling the MBS for cash.

As part of its distribution activities, the Company accounts for the transfer of financial assets in accordance with U.S. GAAP guidance for Transfers and Servicing. In accordance with this guidance, the transfer of financial assets between two entities must meet the following criteria for derecognition and sale accounting:

The Company determined that all loans sold during the periods presented met these specific conditions and accounted for all transfers of loans held for sale as completed sales.

The Company maintains commercial mortgage loans for the purpose of sale to GSEs. Prior to funding, the Company enters into an agreement to sell the loans to third party investors at a fixed price. During the period prior to sale, interest income is calculated and recognized in accordance with the terms of the individual loan. LHFS are recorded at fair value, as the Company has elected the fair value option. The primary reasons the Company has elected to account for loans backed by commercial real estate under the fair value option, are to better offset the change in fair value of the loan and the change in fair value of the derivative instruments used as economic hedges.

The Company initially recognizes and measures the rights to service mortgage loans at fair value and subsequently measures them using the amortization method. The Company recognizes rights to service mortgage loans as separate assets at the time the underlying originated mortgage loan is sold and the value of those rights is included in the determination of the gain on loans held for sale.

Purchased MSRs, including MSRs purchased from CCRE, are initially recorded at fair value and subsequently measured using the amortization method.

The Company receives up to a 3 basis point servicing fee and/or up to a 1 basis point surveillance fee on certain Freddie Mac loans after the loan is securitized in a Freddie Mac pool (the “Freddie Mac Strip”). The Freddie Mac Strip is also recognized at fair value and subsequently measured using the amortization method, but is recognized as an MSR at the securitization date.

MSRs are assessed for impairment, at least on an annual basis, based upon the fair value of those rights as compared to the amortized cost. Fair values are estimated using a valuation model that calculates the present value of the future net servicing cash flows. In using this valuation method, the Company incorporates assumptions that management believes market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income. It is reasonably possible such estimates may change. The Company amortizes the MSRs in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated net servicing income. For purposes of impairment evaluation and measurement, the Company stratifies MSRs based on predominant risk characteristics of the underlying loans, primarily by investor type (Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac, FHA/GNMA, CMBS, and other). To the extent that the carrying value exceeds fair value of a specific MSR strata, a valuation allowance is established, which is adjusted in the future as the fair value of MSRs increases or decreases. Reversals of valuation allowances cannot exceed the amortized cost.

Warehouse notes payable are borrowings under warehouse line agreements. The carrying amounts approximate fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. Outstanding borrowings against these lines are collateralized by an assignment of the underlying mortgages and third party purchase commitments. The borrowing rates on the warehouse lines are based on short-term LIBOR plus applicable margins. Accordingly, warehouse notes payable are typically classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Company recognizes a liability in connection with the guarantee provided to Fannie Mae under the Delegated Underwriting and Servicing Program (“DUS”) and Freddie Mac under the Targeted Affordable Housing Program (“TAH”). The financial guarantee liability requires the Company to make payments to the guaranteed party based on the borrower’s failure to meet its obligations. The liability is adjusted through provisions charged or reversed through operations.

Derivative contracts are instruments, such as futures, forwards, options or swaps contracts that derive their value from underlying assets, indices, reference rates or a combination of these factors. Derivative instruments may be listed and traded on an exchange, or they may be privately negotiated contracts, which are often referred to as OTC derivatives. Derivatives may involve future commitments to purchase or sell financial instruments or commodities, or to exchange currency or interest payment streams. The amounts exchanged are based on the specific terms of the contract with reference to specified rates, securities, commodities, currencies or indices.

In addition, the Company has loan commitments to extend credit to third parties. The commitments to extend credit are for mortgage loans at a specific rate (rate lock commitments). These commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require a fee. The Company is committed to extend credit to the counterparty as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the commitment contracts. For certain of these loan commitments, the Company simultaneously enters into an agreement to deliver such mortgages to third party investors at a fixed price (forward sale contracts). Both the origination and delivery commitment qualify as derivative financial instruments.

U.S. GAAP requires that an entity recognize all derivative contracts as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition and measure those instruments at fair value. The fair value of all derivative contracts is recorded on a net-by-counterparty basis where a legal right of offset exists under an enforceable netting agreement. Derivative contracts are recorded as part of receivables from or payables to broker-dealers, clearing organizations, customers and related broker-dealers in the Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition.

On September 8, 2017, the Company completed the Berkeley Point Acquisition for an acquisition price of $875.0 million, with $3.2 million of the acquisition price paid in units of BGC Holdings. As the Company purchased and acquired Berkeley Point from CCRE, an affiliate of Cantor, this transaction has been determined to be a combination of entities under common control that resulted

in a change in the reporting entity. Accordingly, the financial results of the Company have been recast to include the financial results of Berkeley Point in the current and prior periods presented.

The assets and liabilities of Berkeley Point have been recorded in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition at the seller’s historical carrying value. The excess of the purchase price over Berkeley Point’s net assets was accounted for as an equity transaction for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 (the period in which the transaction occurred). For additional information, see Note 1—“Organization and Basis of Presentation.”

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to basis differences between the carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Accordingly, a deferred tax asset of $99.1 million has been recorded against equity for the period ended September 30, 2017, for the basis difference between Berkeley Point’s net assets and its tax basis.

On February 28, 2017, the Company announced that it had completed the acquisition of Besso Insurance Group Limited (“Besso”). Besso, based out of London is an independent insurance broker with a number of divisions including Property, Casualty, Marine, Aviation, Professional and Financial Risks and Reinsurance.

On December 15, 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of the business of Sunrise Brokers Group (“Sunrise Brokers”). Sunrise Brokers, based in London with offices in New York and Hong Kong, is an independent financial brokerage specializing in worldwide equity derivatives.

On November 4, 2016, the Company acquired from Cantor the 80% of the Lucera business (also known as “LFI Holdings, LLC” or “LFI”) not already owned by the Company. This transaction has been determined to be a combination of entities under common control that resulted in a change in the reporting entity. Accordingly, the financial results of the Company have been recast to include the financial results of Lucera in the current and prior periods.

The assets and liabilities of Lucera have been recorded in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition at the seller’s historical carrying value. The excess of the purchase price over Lucera’s net assets was accounted for as an equity transaction for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the period in which the transaction occurred). For additional information, see Note 1—“Organization and Basis of Presentation.”

On September 7, 2017, the Company announced that it had completed the acquisition of six Integra Realty Resources (“IRR”) offices (Washington DC, Baltimore, Wilmington DE, New York/New Jersey, Philadelphia and Atlanta). IRR provides commercial real estate valuation and advisory services.

On July 26, 2017, the Company acquired an approximately 50% controlling interest, and Cantor owns a 25% noncontrolling interest, in a commercial real estate consulting and advisory services firm which services a variety of commercial real estate clients, including lenders, investment banks, and investors and is headquarters in New York, NY. Their core competencies include: underwriting, modeling, structuring, due diligence and asset management.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, and the year ended December 31, 2016, there were several smaller acquisitions in both the Financial Services and Real Estate Services segments. The aggregate consideration paid for these acquisitions was not material.

The total consideration for all acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was approximately $1.0 billion in total fair value, comprised of cash, shares of BGC Class A common stock and BGC Holdings limited partnership units, of which $13.7 million may be issued contingent on certain targets being met through 2022. Excluding the Berkeley Point Acquisition, the excess of the consideration over the fair value of the net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill of approximately $74.3 million.

The total consideration for acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2016 was approximately $139.0 million in total fair value, comprised of cash, shares of the Company’s Class A common stock and BGC Holdings limited partnership units, of which $28.1 million may be issued contingent on certain targets being met through 2022. Excluding the acquisition of Lucera, the excess of the consideration over the fair value of the net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill of approximately $37.1 million. The goodwill figure includes measurement period adjustments of approximately $16.3 million recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

Except for Berkeley Point and Lucera, the results of operations of the Company’s acquisitions have been included in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements subsequent to their respective dates of acquisition. The Company has made a preliminary allocation of the consideration to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date, and expects to finalize its analysis with respect to acquisitions within the first year after the completion of the transaction. Therefore, adjustments to preliminary allocations may occur.

FASB guidance on Earnings Per Share (“EPS”) establishes standards for computing and presenting EPS. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding and contingent shares for which all necessary conditions have been satisfied except for the passage of time. Net income (loss) is allocated to the Company’s outstanding common stock, FPUs, limited partnership units and Cantor units (see Note 2—“Limited Partnership Interests in BGC Holdings”).

The following is the calculation of the Company’s basic EPS (in thousands, except per share data):

Fully diluted EPS is calculated utilizing net income (loss) available to common stockholders plus net income allocations to the limited partnership interests in BGC Holdings, as well as adjustments related to the interest expense on convertible notes, if applicable (see Note 21—“Long-term Debt, Collateralized and Short-term Borrowings”), as the numerator. The denominator is comprised of the Company’s weighted-average number of outstanding shares of common stock and, if dilutive, the weighted-average number of limited partnership interests and other contracts to issue shares of common stock, including convertible notes, stock options and RSUs. The limited partnership interests generally are potentially exchangeable into shares of Class A common stock and are entitled to remaining earnings after the deduction for the Preferred Distribution; as a result, they are included in the fully diluted EPS computation to the extent that the effect would be dilutive.

The following is the calculation of the Company’s fully diluted EPS (in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Fully diluted (loss) earnings per share
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	81,529	$	87,211	$	171,274	$	140,583
Allocations of net income (loss) to limited partnership interests in BGC Holdings, net of tax		45,966		44,693		94,727		72,147
Interest expense on convertible notes, net of tax		—		253		—		3,297
Net income (loss) for fully diluted shares	$	127,495	$	132,157	$	266,001	$	216,027
Weighted-average shares:
Common stock outstanding		288,308		278,601		286,200		276,144
Partnership units¹		167,287		147,222		163,325		144,341
Convertible notes		—		2,121		—		11,495
RSUs (Treasury stock method)		539		423		505		425
Other		1,207		1,394		1,318		2,308
Fully diluted weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding		457,341		429,761		451,348		434,713
Fully diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.28	$	0.31	$	0.59	$	0.50

For the three months ended September 30, 2017, there were no potentially dilutive securities excluded from the computation of fully diluted EPS, for being anti-dilutive. For the three months ended September 30, 2016, approximately 1.0 million potentially dilutive securities were not included in the computation of fully diluted EPS because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, approximately 0.2 million and 1.2 million potentially dilutive securities were not included in the computation of fully diluted EPS because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. In both periods, these were securities or other contracts (RSUs and/or stock options) to issue shares of common stock.

Additionally, as of September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, approximately 3.1 million and 3.9 million shares of contingent Class A common stock and limited partnership units were excluded from the fully diluted EPS computations because the conditions for issuance had not been met by the end of the respective periods.

On June 22, 2016, at the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the stockholders approved an amendment to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Class A common stock from 500 million shares to 750 million shares. The Company filed the certificate of amendment on June 23, 2016, and the amendment was effective on that date.

Changes in shares of the Company’s Class A common stock outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:

On June 22, 2016, at the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the stockholders approved an amendment to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Class B common stock from 100 million shares to 150 million shares and to provide that Class B common stock shall be issued only to certain affiliated entities or related persons. The Company filed the certificate of amendment on June 23, 2016, and the amendment was effective on that date.

The Company has entered into a controlled equity offering (“CEO”) sales agreement with CF&Co (“November 2014 Sales Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company may offer and sell up to an aggregate of 20 million shares of Class A common stock. Shares of the Company’s Class A common stock sold under its CEO sales agreements are used primarily for redemptions and exchanges of limited partnership interests in BGC Holdings. CF&Co is a wholly owned subsidiary of Cantor and an affiliate of the Company. Under this agreement, the Company has agreed to pay CF&Co 2% of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares. As of September 30, 2017, the Company has sold 19,457,181 shares of Class A common stock under the November 2014 Sales Agreement. For additional information, see Note 17—“Related Party Transactions.”

On April 12, 2017, the Company entered into a CEO sales agreement with CF&Co (“April 2017 Sales Agreement”) on the same terms as above, pursuant to which the Company may offer and sell up to an aggregate of 20 million shares of Class A common stock. As of September 30, 2017, the Company has not sold any shares of Class A common stock under the April 2017 Sales Agreement.

The Company’s Board of Directors and Audit Committee have authorized repurchases of the Company’s Class A common stock and redemptions of BGC Holdings limited partnership interests or other equity interests in the Company’s subsidiaries. On February 7, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors and Audit Committee increased the BGC Partners share repurchase and unit redemption authorization to $300 million, which may include purchases from Cantor, its partners or employees or other affiliated persons or entities. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had approximately $228.6 million remaining from its share repurchase and unit redemption authorization. From time to time, the Company may actively continue to repurchase shares and/or redeem units. The table below represents unit redemption and share repurchase activity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017:

The table above represents the gross unit redemptions and share repurchases of the Company’s Class A common stock during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Approximately 5.4 million of the 6.5 million units above were redeemed using cash from the Company’s CEO program, and therefore did not impact the fully diluted number of shares and units outstanding. The remaining redemptions along with the Class A common stock repurchases resulted in a 2.3 million reduction in the fully diluted share count. This net reduction cost the Company approximately $27.0 million (or $11.52 per share/unit) during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. This reduction partially offset the overall growth in the fully diluted share count which resulted from shares issued for equity-based compensation, front office hires and acquisitions.

The changes in the carrying amount of redeemable partnership interest for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (in thousands):

Securities owned primarily consist of unencumbered U.S. Treasury bills held for liquidity purposes. Total Securities owned were $32.1 million as of September 30, 2017 and $35.4 million as of December 31, 2016. For additional information, see Note 13—“Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities.”

Securities purchased under agreements to resell (“Reverse Repurchase Agreements”) and Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (“Repurchase Agreements”) are accounted for as collateralized financing transactions and are recorded at the contractual amount for which the securities will be repurchased or resold, including accrued interest. It is the Company’s policy to obtain possession of collateral with a market value equal to or in excess of the principal amount loaned under Reverse Repurchase Agreements. Collateral is valued daily and the Company may require counterparties to deposit additional collateral or return collateral pledged when appropriate.

As of September 30, 2017, the Company had no reverse repurchase agreements. As of December 31, 2016, Cantor facilitated Reverse Repurchase Agreements between the Company and Cantor in the amount of $54.7 million as part of the Company’s cash management strategy. U.S. Treasury or other fixed income securities were received from Cantor as collateral for the fair value of the Reverse Repurchase Agreement.

As of September 30, 2017, Cantor facilitated Repurchase Agreements between the Company and Cantor in the amount of $1.8 million for the purpose of financing fails. U.S. Treasury or other fixed income securities were provided to Cantor as collateral for the fair value of the Repurchase Agreement. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had no Repurchase Agreements.

The Company uses its warehouse lines and a repurchase agreement to fund mortgage loans originated under its various lending programs. Outstanding borrowings against these lines are collateralized by an assignment of the underlying mortgages and third party purchase commitments. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had the following lines available and borrowings outstanding (in thousands):

¹ On October 18, 2017, the stated spread to One Month LIBOR was reduced to 130 bps.

² On October 11, 2017, the maturity date was extended until October 11, 2018 and the stated spread to One Month LIBOR was reduced by 130 bps.

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had the following lines available and borrowings outstanding (in thousands):

In connection with these warehouse notes payable, the Company is required to meet a number of financial covenants, including maintaining a minimum of $15.0 million of cash and cash equivalents. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and for three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

As of September 30, 2017, the Company had Securities loaned transactions of $135.1 million with Cantor. The market value of the securities lent was $135.9 million. As of September 30, 2017, the cash collateral received from Cantor bore interest rates ranging from 1.3% to 2.0%. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had no Securities loaned transactions.

Marketable securities consist of the Company’s ownership of various investments. The investments had a fair value of $259.4 million and $164.8 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company held marketable securities classified as trading securities with a market value of $248.2 million and $154.8 million, respectively. These securities are measured at fair value, with any changes in fair value recognized currently in earnings and included in “Other income (loss)” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. During the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized realized and unrealized net gains of $12.8 million and $6.1 million, respectively, related to the mark-to-market on these shares and any related hedging transactions when applicable. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized a realized and unrealized net gain of $24.3 million and $12.8 million, respectively, related to the mark-to-market on these shares and any related hedging transaction when applicable.

In connection with the Company’s sale of its on-the-run, electronic benchmark U.S. Treasury platform (“eSpeed”) to Nasdaq, on June 28, 2013, the Company will receive a remaining earn-out of up to 9,922,470 shares of Nasdaq common stock ratably over the next approximately 10 years, provided that Nasdaq, as a whole, produces at least $25.0 million in gross revenues for each fiscal year beginning July 1. During the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, in connection with the Nasdaq earn-out, the Company recognized gains of $77.0 million and $67.0 million, respectively, in “Other income (loss)” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company held marketable securities classified as available-for-sale with a market value of $11.3 million and $10.0 million, respectively. These securities are measured at fair value, with unrealized gains or losses included as part of “Other comprehensive income (loss)” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). During the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized a gain of $0.5 million related to these marketable securities classified as available-for-sale. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized a gain of $1.2 million and a loss of $0.7 million, respectively, related to these marketable securities classified as available-for-sale.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company sold marketable securities with a market value of $7.8 million at the time of sale. The Company did not purchase any marketable securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company sold marketable securities with a market value of $618.1 million at the time of sale and purchased marketable securities with a market value of $68.4 million.

Loans held for sale represent originated loans that are typically sold within 45 days from the date that the mortgage loan is funded. The Company initially and subsequently measures all loans held for sale at fair value on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statement of financial condition. This fair value measurement falls within the definition of a Level 2 measurement (significant other observable inputs) within the fair value hierarchy. For additional information, see Note 13 – “Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities.” Electing to use fair value allows a better offset of the change in fair value of the loan and the change in fair value of the derivative instruments used as economic hedges. Loans held for sale had a cost basis and fair value as follows (in thousands):

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, there were no loans held for sale that were 90 days or more past due or in nonaccrual status.

During the period prior to its sale, interest income on a loan held for sale is calculated in accordance with the terms of the individual loan. Interest income on Loans held for sale was $5.7 million and $5.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and was $24.9 million and $15.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Interest income on Loans held for sale is included as part of “Interest income” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Receivables from and payables to broker-dealers, clearing organizations, customers and related broker-dealers primarily represent amounts due for undelivered securities, cash held at clearing organizations and exchanges to facilitate settlement and clearance of matched principal transactions, spreads on matched principal transactions that have not yet been remitted from/to clearing organizations and exchanges and amounts related to open derivative contracts, including derivative contracts into which the Company may enter to minimize the effect of price changes of the Company’s marketable securities (see Note 12—“Derivatives”). As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, Receivables from and payables to broker-dealers, clearing organizations, customers and related broker-dealers consisted of the following (in thousands):

A portion of these receivables and payables are with Cantor. See Note 17—“Related Party Transactions,” for additional information related to these receivables and payables.

Substantially all open fails to deliver, open fails to receive and pending trade transactions as of September 30, 2017 have subsequently settled at the contracted amounts.

The Company also enters into commitments to extend credit for mortgage loans at a specific rate (“Rate lock commitments”) and commitments to deliver these loans to third party investors at a fixed price (which are included in forwards in the below disclosure). In the normal course of operations, the Company also enters into other derivative contracts. These derivative contracts primarily consist of foreign exchange swaps, foreign exchange/commodities options, and interest rate swaps. The Company enters into derivative contracts to facilitate client transactions, hedge principal positions and facilitate hedging activities of affiliated companies.

Derivative contracts can be exchange-traded or OTC. Exchange-traded derivatives typically fall within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether they are deemed to be actively traded or not. The Company generally values exchange-traded derivatives using their closing prices. OTC derivatives are valued using market transactions and other market evidence whenever possible, including market-based inputs to models, broker or dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. For OTC derivatives that trade in liquid markets, such as generic forwards, swaps and options, model inputs can generally be verified and model selection does not involve significant management judgment. Such instruments are typically classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. However, some derivative contracts held by the Company, such as rate lock commitments and forwards related to mortgage loans, are valued by the Company using pricing models that entail unobservable inputs, which are significant to the fair value measurement of the derivative contracts. Accordingly, such derivative contracts are generally classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Company does not designate any derivative contracts as hedges for accounting purposes. FASB guidance requires that an entity recognize all derivative contracts as either assets or liabilities in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition and measure those instruments at fair value. The fair value of all derivative contracts is recorded on a net-by-counterparty basis where a legal right to offset exists under an enforceable netting agreement. Derivative contracts are recorded as part of “Receivables from broker-dealers, clearing organizations, customers and related broker-dealers” and “Payables to broker-dealers, clearing organizations, customers and related broker-dealers” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. The fair value of derivative contracts, computed in accordance with the Company’s netting policy, is set forth below (in thousands):

The notional amounts of these derivative contracts at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were $16.7 billion and $13.6 billion, respectively. At September 30, 2017, the notional amounts primarily consisted of long futures of $7.1 billion and short futures of $7.2 billion. As of September 30, 2017, these notional values of long and short futures contracts were primarily related to fixed income futures in a consolidated VIE acquired in the acquisition of GFI, of which the Company’s exposure to economic loss is approximately $2.6 million. The remaining notional amounts as of September 30, 2017 consisted of foreign exchange swaps of $1.1 billion, forwards related to mortgage loans of $0.9 billion, and rate lock commitments of $0.2 billion.

The interest rate swaps represent matched customer transactions settled through and guaranteed by a central clearing organization. Certain of the Company’s foreign exchange swaps are with Cantor. See Note 17—“Related Party Transactions,” for additional information related to these transactions.

The change in fair value of interest rate swaps, futures, foreign exchange/commodities options, foreign exchange swaps, and generic forwards is reported as part of “Principal transactions” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. The change in fair value of equity options related to marketable securities is included as part of “Other income (loss)” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. The change in fair value of rate lock commitments and forwards related to mortgage loans are reported as part of “Gains from mortgage banking activities, net” in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The change in fair value of rate lock commitments are disclosed net of $1.8 million of expenses, which are reported as part of “Compensation and employee benefits” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated

statements of operations. The table below summarizes gains and losses on derivative contracts for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):

FASB guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 measurements—Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2 measurements—Quoted prices in markets that are not active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 measurements—Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

As required by FASB guidance, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy financial assets and liabilities accounted for at fair value under FASB guidance at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):

	Assets at Fair Value at September 30, 2017
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Netting and Collateral			Total
Loans held for sale	$	—	$	660,332	$	—	$	—		$	660,332
Marketable securities		259,442		—		—		—			259,442
Government debt		32,019		—		—		—			32,019
Securities owned—Equities		102		—		—		—			102
Forwards		—		16		6,422		(2	)		6,436
Rate lock commitments		—		—		4,678		—			4,678
Foreign exchange swaps		—		4,078		—		(949	)		3,129
Foreign exchange/commodities options		1,013		—		—		—			1,013
Interest rate swaps		—		245		—		—			245
Futures		—		67		—		—			67
Total	$	292,576	$	664,738	$	11,100	$	(951	)	$	967,463

Changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the three months ended September 30, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):

Changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the three months ended September 30, 2016 are as follows (in thousands):

Changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):

Changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 are as follows (in thousands):

¹ Realized and unrealized gains (losses) are reported in “Other expenses” and “Other income (loss),” as applicable, in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The following tables present information about the offsetting of derivative instruments and collateralized transactions as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):

	September 30, 2017
						Net Amounts Presented in the		Gross Amounts Not Offset
	Gross Amounts		Gross Amounts Offset			Statements of Financial Condition		Financial Instruments		Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount
Assets
Forwards	$	6,438	$	(2	)	$	6,436	$	—	$	—	$	6,436
Rate lock commitments		4,678		—			4,678		—		—		4,678
Foreign exchange swaps		4,078		(949	)		3,129		—		—		3,129
Foreign exchange/commodities options		1,013		—			1,013		—		—		1,013
Interest rate swaps		245		—			245		—		—		245
Futures		67		—			67		—		—		67
Total	$	16,519	$	(951	)	$	15,568	$	—	$	—	$	15,568
Liabilities
Foreign exchange swaps	$	2,689	$	(949	)	$	1,740	$	—	$	—	$	1,740
Rate lock commitments		863		—			863		—		—		863
Forwards		596		(2	)		594		—		—		594
Futures		442		—			442		—		—		442
Foreign exchange/commodities options		313		—			313		—		—		313
Total	$	4,903	$	(951	)	$	3,952	$	—	$	—	$	3,952

	December 31, 2016
						Net Amounts Presented in the		Gross Amounts Not Offset
	Gross Amounts		Gross Amounts Offset			Statements of Financial Condition		Financial Instruments		Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount
Assets
Forwards	$	17,881	$	(22	)	$	17,859	$	—	$	—	$	17,859
Foreign exchange swaps		3,441		(495	)		2,946		—		—		2,946
Rate lock commitments		2,100	—				2,100		—		—		2,100
Foreign exchange/commodities options		244		—			244		—		—		244
Interest rate swaps		202		—			202		—		—		202
Total	$	23,868	$	(517	)	$	23,351	$	—	$	—	$	23,351
Liabilities
Rate lock commitments	$	9,670	$	—		$	9,670	$	—	$	—	$	9,670
Foreign exchange swaps		1,472		(495	)		977		—		—		977
Futures		512		—			512		—		—		512
Foreign exchange/commodities options		41		—			41		—		—		41
Forwards		58		(22	)		36		—		—		36
Total	$	11,753	$	(517	)	$	11,236	$	—	$	—	$	11,236

Certain of the Company’s foreign exchange swaps are with Cantor. See Note 17—“Related Party Transactions,” for additional information related to these transactions.

The following tables present quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs utilized by the Company in the fair value measurement of Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):

Valuations for rate lock commitments, forwards, and contingent consideration are conducted by the Company. Each reporting period, the Company updates unobservable inputs. The Company has a formal process to review the material accuracy of changes in fair value.

The significant unobservable input used in the fair value of the Company’s rate lock commitments and forwards is the counterparty credit risk. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value of the Company’s contingent consideration are the discount rate and forecasted financial information. Significant increases (decreases) in the discount rate would have resulted in a lower (higher) fair value measurement. Significant increases (decreases) in the forecasted financial information would have resulted in a higher (lower) fair value measurement. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the present value of expected payments

related to the Company’s contingent consideration was $71.4 million and $66.0 million, respectively. The undiscounted value of the payments, assuming that all contingencies are met, would be $88.8 million and $81.3 million, respectively.

The Company is a party to a Credit Enhancement Agreement (“CEA”) dated March 9, 2012, with German American Capital Corporation and Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corporation (together, “DB Entities”). On October 20, 2016, the DB Entities assigned the CEA to Deutsche Bank AG Cayman Island Branch, a Cayman Island Branch of Deutsche Bank AG (“DB Cayman”). Under the terms of these agreements, DB Cayman provides the Company with varying levels of ongoing credit protection, subject to certain limits, for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans subject to loss sharing (see Note 25—“Financial Guarantee Liability”) in the Company’s servicing portfolio as of March 9, 2012. DB Cayman will also reimburse the Company for any losses incurred due to violation of underwriting and serving agreements that occurred prior to March 9, 2012. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, there were no reimbursements under this agreement.

As of September 30, 2017, the Company had $18.3 billion of credit risk loans in its servicing portfolio with a maximum pre-credit enhancement loss exposure of $5.2 billion. The Company had a form of credit protection from DB Cayman on $4.4 billion of credit risk loans with a maximum loss exposure coverage of $1.3 billion. The amount of the maximum loss exposure without any form of credit protection from DB Cayman is $3.9 billion.

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had $16.9 billion of credit risk loans in its servicing portfolio with a maximum pre-credit enhancement loss exposure of $4.7 billion. The Company had a form of credit protection from DB Cayman on $5.5 billion of credit risk loans with a maximum loss exposure coverage of $1.6 billion. The amount of the maximum loss exposure without any form of credit protection from DB Cayman is $3.1 billion.

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the credit enhancement receivable was $11 thousand and $156 thousand, respectively, and is included as part of “Other assets” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.

The CEA required the DB Entities to deposit $25 million into the Company’s Fannie Mae restricted liquidity account (see Note 28—“Regulatory Requirements”), which the Company is required to return to DB Cayman, less any outstanding claims, on March 9, 2021. The $25 million deposit is included in “Cash segregated under regulatory requirements” and the offsetting liability in “Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities” in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the contingent liability was $10.7 million and $10.4 million, respectively, and is included as part of “Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.

Gains from mortgage banking activities, net consist of the following activity (in thousands):

The changes in the carrying amount of mortgage servicing rights for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (in thousands):

On July 21, 2016, the Company purchased the mortgage servicing rights to a portfolio of FHA/GNMA construction loans from an unaffiliated third party for $3.8 million.

The amount of contractually specified servicing fees (including primary and special servicing fees) and ancillary fees (including yield maintenance fees) earned by the Company were as follows:

The estimated fair value of Mortgage servicing rights, net as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $403.5 million and $344.9 million, respectively.

Fair values are estimated using a valuation model that calculates the present value of the future net servicing cash flows. The cash flows assumptions used are based on assumptions the Company believes market participants would use to value the portfolio. Significant assumptions include estimates of the cost of servicing per loan, discount rate, earnings rate on escrow deposits and prepayment speeds. An increase in discount rate of 100 bps or 200 bps would result in a decrease in fair value by $11.5 million and $22.4 million, respectively, as of September 30, 2017 and by $9.9 million and $19.3 million, respectively, at December 31, 2016.

Throughout Europe and Asia, the Company provides Cantor with administrative services, technology services and other support for which it charges Cantor based on the cost of providing such services plus a mark-up, generally 7.5%. In the U.K., the Company provides these services to Cantor through Tower Bridge. The Company owns 52% of Tower Bridge and consolidates it, and Cantor owns 48%. Cantor’s interest in Tower Bridge is reflected as a component of “Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition, and the portion of Tower Bridge’s income attributable to Cantor is included as part of “Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. In the U.S., the Company provides Cantor with technology services for which it charges Cantor based on the cost of providing such services.

For the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Cantor’s share of the net income in Tower Bridge was $0.9 million and $1.4 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Cantor’s share of the net income in Tower Bridge was $1.0 million and $1.9 million, respectively. Cantor’s noncontrolling interest is included as part of “Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.

The administrative services agreement provides that direct costs incurred are charged back to the service recipient. Additionally, the service recipient generally indemnifies the service provider for liabilities that it incurs arising from the provision of services other than liabilities arising from fraud or willful misconduct of the service provider. In accordance with the administrative service agreement, the Company has not recognized any liabilities related to services provided to affiliates.

For the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized related party revenues of $7.2 million and $6.4 million, respectively, for the services provided to Cantor, including fees related to the Special Asset Servicing Arrangement between Berkeley Point and CCRE. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized related party revenues of $20.1 million and $19.1 million, respectively, for the services provided to Cantor, including fees related to the Special Asset Servicing Arrangement between Berkeley Point and CCRE. These revenues are included as part of “Fees from related parties” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

In the U.S., Cantor and its affiliates provide the Company with administrative services and other support for which Cantor charges the Company based on the cost of providing such services. In connection with the services Cantor provides, the Company and Cantor entered into an employee lease agreement whereby certain employees of Cantor are deemed leased employees of the Company. For the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company was charged $13.9 million and $12.8 million, respectively, for the services provided by Cantor and its affiliates, of which $9.5 million and $7.5 million, respectively, were to cover compensation to leased employees for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company was charged $42.8 million and $35.8 million, respectively, for the services provided by Cantor and its affiliates, of which $26.4 million and $20.4 million, respectively, were to cover compensation to leased employees for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.The fees paid to Cantor for administrative and support services, other than those to cover the compensation costs of leased employees, are included as part of “Fees to related parties” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. The fees paid to Cantor to cover the compensation costs of leased employees are included as part of “Compensation and employee benefits” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Contemporaneously with the Berkeley Point Acquisition, on September 8, 2017, the Company invested $100 million in a newly formed commercial real estate-related financial and investment business, Real Estate LP, which is controlled and managed by Cantor. Real Estate LP may conduct activities in any real estate related business or asset backed securities-related business or any extensions thereof and ancillary activities thereto. As of September 30, 2017, the Company’s investment is accounted for under the equity method.

On October 25, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors and Audit Committee authorized the purchase of 9,000 Class B Units of Lucera, representing all of the issued and outstanding Class B Units of Lucera not already owned by the Company. On November 4, 2016, the Company completed this transaction. As a result of this transaction, the Company owns 100% of the ownership interests in Lucera. The Company previously had a 20% ownership interest in Lucera and accounted for its investment using the equity method.

In the purchase agreement, Cantor agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to solicit certain senior executives of Lucera’s business and was granted the right to be a customer of Lucera’s businesses on the best terms made available to any other customer. The aggregate purchase price paid by the Company to Cantor consisted of approximately $24.2 million in cash plus a $4.8 million post-closing adjustment determined after closing based on netting Lucera’s expenses paid by Cantor after May 1, 2016 against accounts receivable owed to Lucera by Cantor for access to Lucera’s business from May 1, 2016 through the closing date. The purchase has been accounted for as a transaction between entities under common control.

During the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, Lucera had $0.3 million and $0.6 million in related party revenues from Cantor. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, Lucera had $1.0 million and $2.4 million in related party revenues from Cantor. These revenues are included in “Data, software and post-trade” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The Company receives certain clearing services from Cantor pursuant to its clearing agreement. These clearing services are provided in exchange for payment by the Company of third-party clearing costs and allocated costs. The costs associated with these payments are included as part of “Fees to related parties” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. The costs for these services were immaterial for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

The Company is authorized to enter into short-term arrangements with Cantor to cover any failed U.S. Treasury securities transactions and to share equally in any net income resulting from such transactions, as well as any similar clearing and settlement issues. As of September 30, 2017, Cantor facilitated Repurchase Agreements between the Company and Cantor in the amount of $1.8 million for the purpose of financing fails. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had not entered into any arrangements to cover any failed U.S. Treasury transactions.

To more effectively manage the Company’s exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates, the Company and Cantor have agreed to jointly manage the exposure. As a result, the Company is authorized to divide the quarterly allocation of any profit or loss relating to foreign exchange currency hedging between Cantor and the Company. The amount allocated to each party is based on the total net exposure for the Company and Cantor. The ratio of gross exposures of Cantor and the Company is utilized to determine the shares of profit or loss allocated to each for the period. During the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized its share of foreign exchange gains of $46 thousand and $684 thousand, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized its share of foreign exchange losses of $2.8 million and $106 thousand, respectively. These gains and losses are included as part of “Other expenses” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Pursuant to the separation agreement relating to the Company’s acquisition of certain BGC businesses from Cantor in 2008, Cantor has a right, subject to certain conditions, to be the Company’s customer and to pay the lowest commissions paid by any other customer, whether by volume, dollar or other applicable measure. In addition, Cantor has an unlimited right to internally use market data from the Company without any cost. Any future related-party transactions or arrangements between the Company and Cantor are subject to the prior approval by the Company’s Audit Committee. During the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded revenues from Cantor entities of $67 thousand and $36 thousand, respectively, related to commissions paid to the Company by Cantor. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded revenues from Cantor entities of $198 thousand and $116 thousand, respectively, related to commissions paid to the Company by Cantor. These revenues are included as part of “Commissions” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

In March 2009, the Company and Cantor were authorized to utilize each other’s brokers to provide brokerage services for securities not brokered by such entity, so long as, unless otherwise agreed, such brokerage services were provided in the ordinary course and on terms no less favorable to the receiving party than such services are provided to typical third-party customers.

In August 2013, the Audit Committee authorized the Company to invest up to $350 million in an asset-backed commercial paper program for which certain Cantor entities serve as placement agent and referral agent. The program issues short-term notes to money market investors and is expected to be used by the Company from time to time as a liquidity management vehicle. The notes are backed by assets of highly rated banks. The Company is entitled to invest in the program so long as the program meets investment policy guidelines, including policies related to ratings. Cantor will earn a spread between the rate it receives from the short-term note issuer and the rate it pays to the Company on any investments in this program. This spread will be no greater than the spread earned by Cantor for placement of any other commercial paper note in the program. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company did not have any investments in the program.

On June 5, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with Cantor providing Cantor, CF Group Management, Inc. (“CFGM”) and other Cantor affiliates entitled to hold Class B common stock the right to exchange from time to time, on a one-to-one basis, subject to adjustment, up to an aggregate of 34,649,693 shares of Class A common stock now owned or subsequently acquired by such Cantor entities for up to an aggregate of 34,649,693 shares of Class B common stock. Such shares of Class B common stock, which currently can be acquired upon the exchange of exchangeable limited partnership units owned in BGC Holdings, are already included in the Company’s fully diluted share count and will not increase Cantor’s current maximum potential voting power in the common equity. The exchange agreement will enable the Cantor entities to acquire the same number of shares of Class B common stock that they are already entitled to acquire without having to exchange its exchangeable limited partnership units in BGC Holdings. The Company’s Audit Committee and full Board of Directors determined that it was in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to approve the exchange agreement because it will help ensure that Cantor retains its exchangeable limited partnership units in BGC Holdings, which is the same partnership in which the Company’s partner employees participate, thus continuing to align the interests of Cantor with those of the partner employees.

Under the exchange agreement, Cantor and CFGM have the right to exchange 14,676,743 shares of Class A common stock owned by them as of September 30, 2017 for the same number of shares of Class B common stock. Cantor would also have the right to exchange any shares of Class A common stock subsequently acquired by it for shares of Class B common stock, up to 34,649,693 shares of Class B common stock.

The Company and Cantor have agreed that any shares of Class B common stock issued in connection with the exchange agreement would be deducted from the aggregate number of shares of Class B common stock that may be issued to the Cantor entities upon exchange of exchangeable limited partnership units in BGC Holdings. Accordingly, the Cantor entities will not be entitled to receive any more shares of Class B common stock under this agreement than they were previously eligible to receive upon exchange of exchangeable limited partnership units.

On June 23, 2015, the Audit Committee of the Company authorized management to enter into a revolving credit facility with Cantor of up to $150.0 million in aggregate principal amount pursuant to which Cantor or BGC would be entitled to borrow funds from each other from time to time. The outstanding balances would bear interest at the higher of the borrower’s or the lender’s short-term borrowing rate then in effect, plus 1%.

On April 21, 2017, pursuant to the authorization, the Company entered into a $150.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with an affiliate of Cantor. BGC agreed to lend $150.0 million under the Credit Facility to such affiliate (the “Loan”). On September 8, 2017, the outstanding balance of $150.0 million was repaid in its entirety. As of September 30, 2017, there were no borrowings outstanding under the facility. The Credit Facility has a maturity date of April 20, 2018, which may be extended from time to time on the terms set forth in the Credit Facility. The Company recorded interest income related to the Loan of $1.3 million and $2.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

As part of the Company’s cash management process, the Company may enter into tri-party repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements and other short-term investments, some of which may be with Cantor. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had no reverse repurchase agreements. As of December 31, 2016, Cantor facilitated reverse repurchase agreements on the Company’s behalf, and consequently the Company had $54.7 million of reverse repurchase agreements outstanding with Cantor.

On February 9, 2016, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors authorized the Company to enter into an arrangement with Cantor in which the Company would provide dedicated development services to Cantor at a cost to the Company not to exceed $1.4 million per year for the purpose of Cantor developing the capacity to provide quotations in certain securities from time to time. The services are terminable by either party at any time and will be provided on the terms and conditions set forth in the existing Administrative Services Agreement. The Company did not provide development services to Cantor in the three or nine months ended September 30, 2017 under this arrangement. The cost of development services provided to date is approximately $1.2 million.

In July 2016, the Audit Committee of the Company authorized the Company to provide real estate and related services, including real estate advice, brokerage, property or facilities management, appraisals and valuations and other services, to Cantor on rates and terms no less favorable to the Company than those charged to third-party customers. The Company and Cantor expect to enter into these arrangements from time to time. The Company did not provide any such real estate and related services in the three months ended September 30, 2017.

Amounts due to or from Cantor and Freedom International Brokerage, one of the Company’s equity method investments, are for transactional revenues under a technology and services agreement with Freedom International Brokerage as well as for open derivative contracts. These are included as part of “Receivables from broker-dealers, clearing organizations, customers and related broker-dealers” or “Payables to broker-dealers, clearing organizations, customers and related broker-dealers” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had receivables from Freedom International Brokerage of $1.3 million. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had $3.1 million and $3.0 million, respectively, in receivables from Cantor related to open derivative contracts. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had $1.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively, in payables to Cantor related to open derivative contracts.

The Company has entered into various agreements with certain employees and partners whereby these individuals receive loans which may be either wholly or in part repaid from the distribution earnings that the individuals receive on some or all of their limited partnership interests or may be forgiven over a period of time. The forgivable portion of these loans is recognized as compensation expense over the life of the loan. From time to time, the Company may also enter into agreements with employees and partners to

grant bonus and salary advances or other types of loans. These advances and loans are repayable in the timeframes outlined in the underlying agreements.

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the aggregate balance of employee loans, net, was $311.0 million and $269.8 million, respectively, and is included as “Loans, forgivable loans and other receivables from employees and partners, net” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. Compensation expense for the above-mentioned employee loans for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $26.0 million and $24.2 million, respectively. Compensation expense for the above-mentioned employee loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $43.2 million and $46.0 million, respectively. The compensation expense related to these employee loans is included as part of “Compensation and employee benefits” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Interest income on the above-mentioned employee loans for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $1.7 million and $1.6 million, respectively. Interest income on the above-mentioned employee loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $4.8 million and $4.3 million, respectively. The interest income related to these employee loans is included as part of “Interest income” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

On February 23, 2016, the Company purchased from Cantor 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock at a price of $8.72 per share, the closing price on the date of the transaction. This transaction was included in the Company’s stock repurchase authorization and was approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

As discussed in Note 6—“Stock Transactions and Unit Redemptions,” the Company has entered into the November 2014 Sales Agreement and the April 2017 Sales Agreement with CF&Co, as the Company’s sales agent. During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company sold 1.1 million shares under its sales agreement for aggregate proceeds of $15.1million, at a weighted-average price of $13.24 per share. During the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company sold 2.3 million shares under its sales agreement for aggregate proceeds of $20.7 million, at a weighted-average price of $9.05 per share. For the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company was charged approximately $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively, for services related to the Company’s sales agreement. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company sold 5.4 million shares under its sales agreement for aggregate proceeds of $62.9 million, at a weighted-average price of $11.62 per share. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company sold 6.0 million shares under its sales agreement for aggregate proceeds of $54.4 million, at a weighted-average price of $9.12 per share. As of September 30, 2017, the Company has not sold any shares of Class A common stock under the April 2017 Sales Agreement. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company was charged approximately $1.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, for services related to the November 2014 Sales Agreement. The net proceeds of the shares sold are included as part of “Additional paid-in capital” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The Company has engaged CF&Co and its affiliates to act as financial advisor in connection with one or more third-party business combination transactions as requested by the Company on behalf of its affiliates from time to time on specified terms, conditions and fees. The Company may pay finders’, investment banking or financial advisory fees to broker-dealers, including, but not limited to, CF&Co and its affiliates, from time to time in connection with certain business combination transactions, and, in some cases, the Company may issue shares of the Company’s Class A common stock in full or partial payment of such fees.

On October 3, 2014, management was granted approval by the Company’s Board of Directors and Audit Committee to enter into stock loan transactions with CF&Co utilizing shares of Marketable securities. Such stock loan transactions will bear market terms and rates. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had Securities loaned transactions of $135.1 million with CF&Co. The market value of the securities lent was $135.9 million. As of September 30, 2017, the cash collateral received from CF&Co bore interest rates ranging from 1.3% to 2.0%. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had no Securities loaned transactions with CF&Co. Securities loaned transactions are included in “Securities loaned” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.

On May 27, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of $300.0 million principal amount of 5.125% Senior Notes due 2021 (the “5.125% Senior Notes”). In connection with this issuance of 5.125% Senior Notes, the Company recorded approximately $0.5 million in underwriting fees payable to CF&Co and $18 thousand to CastleOak Securities, L.P. These fees were recorded as a deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability, which is amortized as interest expense over the term of the notes. Cantor purchased $15.0 million of such senior notes and still holds such notes as of September 30, 2017.

Under rules adopted by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”), all foreign introducing brokers engaging in transactions with U.S. persons are required to register with the National Futures Association and either meet financial reporting and net capital requirements on an individual basis or obtain a guarantee agreement from a registered Futures Commission Merchant. From time to time, the Company’s foreign-based brokers engage in interest rate swap transactions with U.S.-based counterparties, and therefore the Company is subject to the CFTC requirements. CF&Co has entered into guarantees on behalf of the Company, and the Company is required to indemnify CF&Co for the amounts, if any, paid by CF&Co on behalf of the Company pursuant to this arrangement. During the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded fees of $31.3 thousand, with respect to these guarantees. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded fees of $93.8 thousand, with respect to these guarantees. These fees were included in “Fees to related parties” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

On October 29, 2013, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors authorized the Company to enter into agreements from time to time with Cantor and/or its affiliates, including Cantor Commercial Real Estate Company, L.P. (“CCRE”), to provide services, including finding and reviewing suitable acquisition or partner candidates, structuring transactions, negotiating and due diligence services, in connection with the Company’s acquisition and other business strategies in commercial real estate and other businesses. Such services are provided at fees not to exceed the fully-allocated cost of such services, plus 10%. In connection with this agreement, the Company did not recognize any expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

The Company also has a referral agreement in place with CCRE, in which the Company’s brokers are incentivized to refer business to CCRE through a revenue-share agreement. In connection with this revenue-share agreement, the Company recognized revenues of $14 thousand and $0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company recognized revenues of $0.1 million and $0.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. This revenue was recorded as part of “Commissions” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The Company also has a revenue-share agreement with CCRE, in which the Company pays CCRE for referrals for leasing or other services. The Company did not make any payments under this agreement to CCRE for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

In addition, the Company has a loan referral agreement in place with CCRE, in which either party can refer a loan to the other. Revenue from these referrals was $2.8 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $3.3 million and $5.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and was recognized in Gains from mortgage banking activities, net in our unconsolidated condensed consolidated statements of operations. These referrals fees are net of the broker fees and commissions to CCRE of $0.3 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $0.7 million and $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

On September 8, 2017, the Company completed the Berkeley Point Acquisition, for an acquisition price of $875.0 million, with $3.2 million of the acquisition price paid in units of BGC Holdings, pursuant to a Transaction Agreement, dated as of July 17, 2017, with Cantor and certain of Cantor’s affiliates, including CCRE and Cantor Commercial Real Estate Sponsor, L.P., the general partner of CCRE. In accordance with this Transaction Agreement, Berkeley Point made a distribution of $69.8 million to CCRE prior to the Berkeley Point Acquisition, for the amount that Berkeley Point’s net assets exceeded $508.6 million.

On March 11, 2015, the Company and CCRE entered into a note receivable/payable that allows for advances to or from CCRE at an interest rate of 1 month LIBOR plus 1.0%. On September 8, 2017, the note receivable/payable was terminated and all outstanding advances due were paid off. As of December 31, 2016, there was $690.0 million of outstanding advances due to CCRE on the note, and this balance is included in Notes payable to related parties in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. The Company recognized interest income of $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017, and $0.7 million and $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. There was no interest income recognized for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The Company recognized interest expense of $25 thousand and $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $2.5 million and $1.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company purchased the primary servicing rights for $0.3 billion of loans originated by CCRE for $0.6 million. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company purchased the primary servicing rights for $2.8 billion of loans originated by CCRE for $3.9 million. The Company also services loans for CCRE on a “fee for service” basis, generally prior to a loan’s sale or securitization, and for which no mortgage servicing right is recognized. The Company recognized $0.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, and $2.8 million and $2.7 million for the

nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, of servicing revenue from loans purchased from CCRE on a “fee for service” basis, which was included as part of Servicing fees in our unconsolidated condensed consolidated statements of operations.

For information with respect to the Company’s $100 million investment in a newly formed joint venture with Cantor, see “CF Real Estate Finance Holdings, L.P.” above.

Cantor has the right to purchase limited partnership interests (Cantor units) from BGC Holdings upon redemption of non-exchangeable FPUs redeemed by BGC Holdings upon termination or bankruptcy of the founding/working partner. In addition, pursuant to the Sixth Amendment to the BGC Holdings Limited Partnership Agreement (the “Sixth Amendment”), where either current, terminating, or terminated partners are permitted by the Company to exchange any portion of their FPUs and Cantor consents to such exchangeability, the Company shall offer to Cantor the opportunity for Cantor to purchase the same number of new exchangeable limited partnership interests (Cantor units) in BGC Holdings at the price that Cantor would have paid for the FPUs had the Company redeemed them. Any such Cantor units purchased by Cantor are currently exchangeable for up to 34,649,693 shares of Class B common stock or, at Cantor’s election or if there are no such additional shares of Class B common stock, shares of Class A common stock, in each case on a one-for-one basis (subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments).

On November 7, 2016, the Company issued exchange rights with respect to, and Cantor purchased, in transactions exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, an aggregate of 624,762 exchangeable limited partnership units in BGC Holdings, as follows: In connection with the redemption by BGC Holdings of an aggregate of 141,523 non-exchangeable founding partner units from founding partners of BGC Holdings for an aggregate consideration of $560,190, Cantor purchased 141,523 exchangeable limited partnership units from BGC Holdings for an aggregate of $560,190. In addition, pursuant to the Sixth Amendment, on November 7, 2016, Cantor purchased 483,239 exchangeable limited partnership units from BGC Holdings for an aggregate consideration of $1,796,367 in connection with the grant of exchangeability and exchange for 483,239 founding partner units. Subsequent to these transactions, there were 548,259 FPUs remaining which BGC Holdings had the right to redeem or exchange and with respect to which Cantor had the right to purchase an equivalent number of Cantor units.

As of September 30, 2017, there were 991,182 FPUs remaining which BGC Holdings had the right to redeem or exchange and with respect to which Cantor had the right to purchase an equivalent number of Cantor units.

On May 9, 2014, partners of BGC Holdings approved the Tenth Amendment to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of BGC Holdings (the “Tenth Amendment”) effective as of May 9, 2014. In order to facilitate partner compensation and for other corporate purposes, the Tenth Amendment created a new class of partnership units (“NPSUs”).

On December 14, 2016, the Company entered into the Twelfth Amendment to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Partnership, effective as of October 1, 2016 (the “Twelfth Amendment”), which was entered into to amend certain terms and conditions of the Partnership’s N Units in order to provide flexibility to the Company and the Partnership in using such N Units in connection with compensation arrangements and practices. The Twelfth Amendment provides for a minimum $5 million gross revenue requirement in a given quarter as a condition for an N Unit to be replaced by another type of Partnership unit in accordance with the Partnership Agreement and the grant documentation. The Twelfth Amendment was approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.

NPSUs granted to Executive Officers are not entitled to participate in partnership distributions, will not be allocated any items of profit or loss, may not be made exchangeable into shares of the Company’s Class A common stock and will not be included in the fully diluted share count. Subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee or its designee, such N Units may be converted into the underlying unit type (i.e. an NREU will be converted into an REU) and will then participate in partnership distributions, subject to terms and conditions determined by the general partner of BGC Holdings in its sole discretion, including that the recipient continue to provide substantial services to the Company and comply with his or her partnership obligations. The Tenth Amendment was approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and by the full Board of Directors.

On February 24, 2016, the Compensation Committee granted 1,500,000 NPSUs to Mr. Lutnick, 2,000,000 NPSUs to Mr. Lynn, 1,000,000 NPSUs to Mr. Merkel and 75,000 NPSUs to Mr. Windeatt. Conversion of NPSUs into PSUs/PPSUs for Messrs. Lutnick and Merkel and into LPUs/PLPUs for Messrs. Lynn and Windeatt may be (i) 25% per year with respect to NPSUs granted in 2016; (ii) 25% of the previously awarded NPSUs currently held by Messrs. Lutnick and Lynn based upon the original issuance date (the first 25% having already been converted); and (iii) 25% per year of the current balance of NPSUs previously awarded to Mr. Merkel, provided that, with respect to all of the foregoing, such future conversions are subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee each year. The grant of exchange rights with respect to such PSUs/PPSUs and LPUs/PLPUs will be determined in accordance with the

Company’s practices when determining discretionary bonuses or awards, and any grants of exchangeability shall be subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee.

On February 24, 2016, the Compensation Committee granted 750,000 non-exchangeable PSUs and 291,667 PPSUs (which may not be made exchangeable) to Mr. Lutnick; 621,429 non-exchangeable LPUs and 241,667 PLPUs (which may not be made exchangeable) to Mr. Lynn; 114,583 non-exchangeable PSUs and 93,750 PPSUs (which may not be made exchangeable) to Mr. Merkel; 105,188 non-exchangeable LPUs and 40,906 non-exchangeable PLPUs (which may not be made exchangeable) to Mr. Windeatt; and 55,688 non-exchangeable LPUs and 21,656 non-exchangeable PLPUs (which may not be made exchangeable) to Mr. Sadler.

On February 24, 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the acceleration of the lapse of restrictions on transferability with respect to 612,958 shares of restricted stock held by the Company’s executive officers as follows: Mr. Lynn, 431,782 shares; Mr. Merkel, 150,382 shares; and Mr. Sadler, 30,794 shares. On February 24, 2016, Messrs. Lynn and Sadler sold these shares to the Company at $8.40 per share, and Mr. Merkel sold 120,000 of such shares to the Company at $8.40 per share. In connection with such transaction, 64,787 of Mr. Lynn’s and 4,621 of Mr. Sadler’s partnership units were redeemed for zero.

In February 2016, the Company granted exchange rights and/or released transfer restrictions with respect to 2,127,648 rights available to Mr. Lutnick with respect to some of his non-exchangeable limited partnership units (which amount included the lapse of restrictions with respect to 235,357 shares of restricted stock held by him), which were all of such rights available to him at such time. Mr. Lutnick has not transferred or exchanged such shares or units as of the date hereof.

On March 9, 2016, Mr. Lutnick exercised an employee stock option with respect to 250,000 shares of Class A common stock at an exercise price of $8.42 per share. The net exercise of the option resulted in 17,403 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock being issued to Mr. Lutnick. On November 11, 2016, Mr. Lutnick exercised an employee stock option with respect to 800,000 shares of Class A common stock at an exercise price of $8.80 per share. The net exercise of the option resulted in 51,064 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock being issued to Mr. Lutnick.

In July 2016, the Audit Committee authorized the purchase by Mr. Lutnick’s retirement plan of up to $350,000 in Class A common stock at the closing price on the date of purchase. 36,405 shares of Class A common stock were purchased by the plan on August 16, 2016, at $8.77 per share, the closing price on the date of purchase.

On September 30, 2016, Mr. Merkel elected to sell, and the Company agreed to purchase, an aggregate of 16,634 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock at a price of $8.75 per share, the closing price of the Company’s Class A common stock on such date. On September 30, 2016, certain trusts for the benefit of Mr. Merkel’s immediate family, of which Mr. Merkel is the sole trustee of each trust, elected to sell, and the Company agreed to purchase, an aggregate of 4,131 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock on the same terms. These transactions were included in the Company’s stock repurchase authorization and authorized by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

On November 10, 2016, Mr. Dalton exercised a stock option with respect to 7,534 shares of Class A common stock at an exercise price of $8.87 per share.

On November 7, 2016, the Compensation Committee approved a grant of 200,000 non-exchangeable PSUs/PPSUs to Mr. Merkel in replacement of 200,000 NPSUs previously granted to him on or about each of the following dates, provided that the Company and its affiliates earn, in aggregate, at least $25 million in gross revenues in the calendar quarter in which the PSUs/PPSUs are to be granted: (i) December 1, 2016 and (ii) each March 31 of 2017 through 2020 (for an aggregate total of 1,000,000 non-exchangeable PSUs/PPSUs). In connection with the foregoing, Mr. Merkel agreed to surrender a total of 1,714,826 previously granted NPSUs.

Each grant of such non-exchangeable PSUs/PPSUs is subject to Mr. Merkel’s continued employment and compliance with the Partnership Agreement as of the applicable grant date. The number of PSUs and PPSUs issuable on each grant date shall be determined by reference to the then-applicable practices for U.S.-based partners when determining the proportionality of PSUs/PPSUs (currently 55% in PSUs and 45% in PPSUs). The determination price of the PPSUs upon grant shall be the closing price of our Class A common stock on the applicable grant dates. In addition to the foregoing grants of PSUs/PPSUs in replacement of NPSUs, the Compensation Committee granted: (i) effective November 7, 2016, exchange rights with respect to 110,000 of Mr. Merkel’s previously issued non-exchangeable PSUs and 90,000 of Mr. Merkel’s previously issued non-exchangeable PPSUs, and (ii) effective on or about each February 28 of 2017 through 2020, exchange rights for 200,000 of Mr. Merkel’s then non-exchangeable PSU/PPSUs (the proportion of PSUs to PPSUs shall be in accordance with their issuance), subject to Mr. Merkel’s continued employment and compliance with the Partnership Agreement as of the applicable exchangeability date (for an aggregate total of 1 million exchangeable PSUs/PPSUs).

The Compensation Committee also agreed to the repurchase by the Company of (i) the 110,000 exchangeable PSUs for an aggregate of $952,600, based on the closing price of the Company’s Class A common stock on November 7, 2016, and (ii) the 90,000 exchangeable PPSUs for an aggregate of $773,599, at the weighted-average determination price for such PPSUs at the time of grant, which was $8.60 per unit.

As a result of the foregoing schedule, Mr. Merkel did not receive additional grants of exchange rights as part of his 2016 year-end compensation. Consistent with the previously approved schedule, effective February 28, 2017, the Compensation Committee approved (i) the grant of exchange rights with respect to 110,000 PSUs and 90,000 PPSUs held by Mr. Merkel; and (ii) the Company’s redemption for cash of such 110,000 PSUs at the average price that the Company received for sales of Class A common stock sold under the Controlled Equity Offering sales program on the date of approval, less 2%, for an aggregate of $1,216,911, and such 90,000 PPSUs at the applicable determination price of $9.41 per PPSU, for an aggregate of $847,033.

On December 14, 2016, in connection with his execution of a new amended and restated deed of adherence to the U.K. Partnership and a related letter agreement, the Compensation Committee granted 1,000,000 NPSUs and 3,500,000 non-exchangeable LPUs to Mr. Lynn effective as of October 1, 2016. The 1,000,000 NPSUs shall be replaced by non-exchangeable LPUs ratably (in installments of 250,000 each) effective October 1 of 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020, subject to the terms of the letter agreement, including the Revenue Requirement (as defined below).

In January 2017, the requirement of further approval of the Compensation Committee to replace the NPSUs as described above was amended and changed into the requirement that the Company, inclusive of affiliates thereof, earn, in aggregate, at least $5 million in gross revenues in the calendar quarter in which the applicable award of non-exchangeable PSUs/PPSUs/LPUs/PLPUs is to be granted, and such executive remaining an employee or member of an affiliate of BGC and having complied at all times with his applicable employment or membership agreement and the Partnership Agreement as of the applicable grant date (collectively, the “Revenue Requirement”).

On January 31, 2017, in connection with 2016 year-end compensation, certain previous awards of NPSUs vesting on January 1, 2017 were replaced with non-exchangeable PSUs/PPSUs (for Mr. Lutnick) and non-exchangeable LPUs/PLPUs (for Messrs. Lynn and Windeatt), all effective January 1, 2017, with the determination price of each PPSU and PLPU based on the closing price of our Class A common stock on December 30, 2016, which was $10.23. As a result, effective as of January 1, 2017, (a) 2,375,000 of Mr. Lutnick’s NPSUs were replaced with 1,710,000 non-exchangeable PSUs and 665,000 non-exchangeable PPSUs; (b) 750,000 of Mr. Lynn’s NPSUs were replaced with 540,000 non-exchangeable LPUs and 210,000 non-exchangeable PLPUs; and (c) 18,750 of Mr. Windeatt’s NPSUs were replaced with 13,500 non-exchangeable LPUs and 5,250 non-exchangeable PLPUs.

On January 31, 2017, in connection with his execution of an amendment to his amended and restated deed of adherence to the U.K. Partnership and a related letter agreement, the Compensation Committee granted 400,000 NPSUs and 100,000 LPSUs to Mr. Windeatt effective as of February 24, 2017. The 400,000 NPSUs shall be replaced by LPUs ratably (in installments of 100,000 each) on or about each April 1 of 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, subject to the terms of the letter agreement, including the Revenue Requirement.

On January 31, 2017, under the Company’s policy, the Compensation Committee granted exchange rights with respect to rights available to Mr. Lutnick with respect to some of his of his non-exchangeable PSUs/PPSUs. Mr. Lutnick elected to waive such rights as a one-time waiver that is not cumulative. Also pursuant to the policy, the Compensation Committee further approved a grant of 325,000 non-exchangeable PSUs to Mr. Lutnick, in replacement of 325,000 of his NPSUs, and a grant of 1,661,600 non-exchangeable PSUs in replacement of his 1,661,600 non-exchangeable PPSUs, for an aggregate total of 1,986,600 non-exchangeable PSUs, effective as of January 1, 2017, which were all of the rights available to him at such time.

In connection with such transaction, 25,156 of Mr. Lynn’s non-exchangeable LPUs were redeemed for zero. In addition, on January 31, 2017, the Compensation Committee redeemed for cash 180,115 of Mr. Lynn’s non-exchangeable LPUs at the average price that the Company received for sales of Class A common stock sold under the Controlled Equity Offering sales program on the date of approval, less 2%, for an aggregate of $1,958,641, and 70,045 non-exchangeable PLPUs at a determination price of $6.51, for an aggregate of $455,993. In connection with such redemptions from Mr. Lynn, 9,480 of his non-exchangeable LPUs and 3,687 of his non-exchangeable PLPUs at a determination price of $6.51 were redeemed for zero.

aggregate of $96,778, and 3,206 non-exchangeable PLPUs were redeemed at a determination price of $7.83 per unit, for an aggregate of $25,103. In connection with these transactions, 2,902 non-exchangeable LPUs, 782 non-exchangeable PLPUs with a determination price of $6.51, and 347 non-exchangeable PLPUs with a determination price of $7.38 were redeemed for zero.

On the same date, the Compensation Committee approved the redemption for cash of certain of Mr. McMurray’s non-exchangeable LPUs and non-exchangeable PLPUs effective April 1, 2017. On April 1, 2017, the Company redeemed 17,115 of Mr. McMurray’s non-exchangeable LPUs for an aggregate of $188,634, based on the average price that the Company received for sales of Class A common stock sold under the Controlled Equity Offering sales program on such date, less 2%. The Company also redeemed 6,656 non-exchangeable PLPUs at a determination price of $11.07 per unit, for an aggregate of $73,682. In connection with the redemption from Mr. McMurray, 1,849 of his non-exchangeable LPUs and 719 of his non-exchangeable PLPUs with a determination price of $11.07 were redeemed for zero.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company made an interest-free loan to the Cantor Fitzgerald Relief Fund (the “Relief Fund”) for $1.0 million in connection with the Company’s annual Charity Day. As a result of the loan, the Relief Fund issued a promissory note to the Company in the aggregate principal amount of $1.0 million due on August 4, 2016. On March 2, 2016, the promissory note was canceled in connection with charitable contribution commitments related to the Company’s annual Charity Day.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company committed to make charitable contributions to the Relief Fund in the amount of $40.0 million, which the Company recorded in “Other expenses” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the remaining liability associated with this commitment was $30.7 million and $30.7 million, respectively, which is included in “Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.

On February 23, 2016, the Company purchased from the Relief Fund 970,639 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock at a price of $8.72 per share, the closing price on the date of the transaction. On November 16, 2016, the Company purchased from the Relief Fund 166,238 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock at a price of $9.74 per share, the closing price on the date of the transaction.

The Company is authorized to enter into loans, investments or other credit support arrangements for Aqua Securities L.P. (“Aqua”), an alternative electronic trading platform that offers new pools of block liquidity to the global equities markets; such arrangements are proportionally and on the same terms as similar arrangements between Aqua and Cantor. On October 27, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors and Audit Committee increased the authorized amount by an additional $4.0 million, to $16.2 million. The Company has been further authorized to provide counterparty or similar guarantees on behalf of Aqua from time to time, provided that liability for any such guarantees, as well as similar guarantees provided by Cantor, would be shared proportionally with Cantor. Aqua is 51% owned by Cantor and 49% owned by the Company. Aqua is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company made $0.7 million in cash contributions to Aqua. During the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company did not make any cash contributions to Aqua. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company made $1.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, in cash contributions to Aqua. These contributions are recorded as part of “Investments” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.

The Company has also entered into a Subordinated Loan Agreement with Aqua, whereby the Company loaned Aqua the principal sum of $980 thousand. The scheduled maturity date on the subordinated loan is September 1, 2018, and the current rate of interest on the loan is three month LIBOR plus 600 basis points. The loan to Aqua is recorded as part of “Receivables from related parties” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.

The Company recognized a gain of $2.1 million and $0.8 million related to its equity method investments for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company recognized gains of $4.0 million and $2.5 million related to its equity method investments for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company’s share of the gains or losses is reflected in “Gains (losses) on equity method investments” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

On September 8, 2017 the Company invested $100 million in Real Estate LP, which is controlled and managed by Cantor. As of September 30, 2017, the Company’s investment is accounted for under the equity method, and the related gain recognized was $0.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

On November 4, 2016, the Company acquired the remaining interest in Lucera, which had previously been accounted for using the equity method. This transaction resulted in the consolidation of the entity in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements (see Note 17—“Related Party Transactions” for more information).

See Note 17—“Related Party Transactions,” for information regarding related party transactions with unconsolidated entities included in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

The Company had previously acquired investments for which it did not have the ability to exert significant influence over operating and financial policies. The investments are generally accounted for using the cost method of accounting in accordance with FASB guidance, Investments—Other. The carrying value of the cost method investments was $3.1 million as of September 30, 2017 and $2.6 million as of December 31, 2016, and is included in “Investments” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.

Certain of the Company’s equity method investments included in the tables above are considered Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”), as defined under the accounting guidance for consolidation. The Company is not considered the primary beneficiary of and therefore does not consolidate these VIEs. The Company’s involvement with such entities is in the form of direct equity interests and related agreements. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss with respect to the VIEs is its investment in such entities as well as a credit facility and a subordinated loan.

The following table sets forth the Company’s investment in its unconsolidated VIEs and the maximum exposure to loss with respect to such entities as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The amounts presented in the “Investment” column below are included in, and not in addition to, the equity method investment table above (in thousands):

Through the acquisition of GFI, the Company is invested in a limited liability company that is focused on developing a proprietary trading technology. The limited liability company is a VIE and it was determined that the Company is the primary

beneficiary of this VIE because the Company, through GFI, was the provider of the majority of this VIE’s start-up capital and has the power to direct the activities of this VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance, primarily through its voting percentage and consent rights on the activities that would most significantly influence the entity. The consolidated VIE had total assets of $6.3 million as of September 30, 2017, which primarily consisted of clearing margin. There were no material restrictions on the consolidated VIE’s assets. The consolidated VIE had total liabilities of $2.0 million as of September 30, 2017. The Company’s exposure to economic loss on this VIE is approximately $2.6 million.

Depreciation expense was $7.5 million and $7.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Depreciation expense was $22.9 million and $22.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Depreciation is included as part of “Occupancy and equipment” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The Company has approximately $6.5 million of asset retirement obligations related to certain of its leasehold improvements. The associated asset retirement cost is capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. The liability is discounted and accretion expense is recognized using the credit adjusted risk-free interest rate in effect when the liability was initially recognized.

For the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, software development costs totaling $13.5 million and $7.3 million, respectively, were capitalized. Amortization of software development costs totaled $4.7 million and $6.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, software development costs totaling $27.8 million and $17.6 million, respectively, were capitalized. Amortization of software development costs totaled $15.3 million and $20.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Amortization of software development costs is included as part of “Occupancy and equipment” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Impairment charges of $0.5 million and $0.6 million were recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to the evaluation of capitalized software projects for future benefit and for fixed assets no longer in service. Impairment charges of $1.2 million and $3.7 million were recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to the evaluation of the centralized software project for future benefit and fixed assets no longer in service. The impairment charges for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were related to the Financial Services segment. Impairment charges related to capitalized software and fixed assets are reflected in “Occupancy and equipment” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were as follows (in thousands):

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recognized additional goodwill of approximately $29.0 million which was allocated to the Company’s Financial Services segment, and $45.3 million which was allocated to the Company’s Real Estate Services segment. See Note 4—“Acquisitions” for more information.

Goodwill is not amortized and is reviewed annually for impairment or more frequently if impairment indicators arise, in accordance with FASB guidance on Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.

Other intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands, except weighted-average remaining life):

Intangible amortization expense was $8.0 million and $4.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Intangible amortization expense was $23.0 million and $15.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Intangible amortization is included as part of “Other expenses” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

There was a $6.3 million impairment charge for the Company’s indefinite life intangibles for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. There were no impairment charges for the Company’s definite and indefinite life intangibles for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.

The estimated future amortization expense of definite life intangible assets as of September 30, 2017 is as follows (in millions):

Long-term debt, collateralized and short-term borrowings consisted of the following (in thousands):

On September 8, 2017, the Company entered into a committed unsecured senior revolving credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and a syndicate of lenders. The revolving credit agreement provides for revolving loans of up to $400.0 million. The maturity date of the facility is September 8, 2019. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at either LIBOR or a defined base rate plus an additional margin which ranges from 50 basis points to 325 basis points depending on the Company’s debt rating as determined by S&P and Fitch and whether such loan is a LIBOR loan or a base rate loan. As of September 30, 2017, there were $400.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the facility. The carrying value of the facility as of September 30, 2017 was $396.9 million, net of deferred financing costs of $3.1 million. As of September 30, 2017, the interest rate on this facility was 3.49%. The Company recorded interest expense related to the credit facility of $1.1 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

On September 8, 2017, the Company entered into a committed unsecured senior term loan credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and a syndicate of lenders. The term loan credit agreement provides for loans of up to $575.0 million. The maturity date of the agreement is September 8, 2019. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at either LIBOR or a defined base rate plus an additional margin which ranges from 50 basis points to 325 basis points depending on the Company’s debt rating as determined by S&P and Fitch and whether such loan is a LIBOR loan or a base rate loan. The term loan credit agreement is also subject to mandatory prepayment from 100% of net cash proceeds of all material asset sales and debt and equity issuances (subject to certain customary exceptions, including sales under the Company’s CEO sales program). As of September 30, 2017, there were $575.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the facility. The carrying value of the facility as of September 30, 2017 was $572.2 million, net of deferred financing costs of $2.8 million. As of September 30, 2017, the interest rate on this facility was 3.49%. The Company recorded interest expense related to the facility of $1.5 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

The fair values of the Senior Notes were determined using observable market prices as these securities are traded and are considered Level 1 and Level 2, respectively, within the fair value hierarchy, based on whether they are deemed to be actively traded.

On June 26, 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of $112.5 million principal amount of 8.125% Senior Notes due 2042 (the “8.125% Senior Notes”). The 8.125% Senior Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company. The 8.125% Senior Notes may be redeemed for cash, in whole or in part, on or after June 26, 2017, at the Company’s option, at any time and from time to time, until maturity at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount to be redeemed, plus accrued but unpaid interest on the principal amount being redeemed to, but not including, the redemption date. The 8.125% Senior Notes are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “BGCA.” The Company used the proceeds to repay short-term borrowings under its unsecured revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions.

The initial carrying value of the 8.125% Senior Notes was $108.7 million, net of debt issuance costs of $3.8 million. The issuance costs are amortized as interest cost, and the carrying value of the 8.125% Senior Notes will accrete up to the face amount over the term of the 8.125% Senior Notes. The Company recorded interest expense related to the 8.125% Senior Notes of $2.3 million for each of the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. The Company recorded interest expense related to the 8.125% Senior Notes of $6.9 million for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

On December 9, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of $300.0 million principal amount of 5.375% Senior Notes due 2019 (the “5.375% Senior Notes”). The 5.375% Senior Notes are general senior unsecured obligations of the Company. These Senior Notes bear interest at a rate of 5.375% per year, payable in cash on June 9 and December 9 of each year, commencing June 9, 2015. The interest rate payable on the notes will be subject to adjustments from time to time based on the debt rating assigned by specified rating agencies to the notes, as set forth in the Indenture. The 5.375% Senior Notes will mature on December 9, 2019. The Company may redeem some or all of the notes at any time or from time to time for cash at certain “make-whole” redemption prices (as set forth in the Indenture). If a “Change of Control Triggering Event” (as defined in the Indenture) occurs, holders may require the Company to purchase all or a portion of their notes for cash at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the purchase date.

The initial carrying value of the 5.375% Senior Notes was $295.1 million, net of the discount and debt issuance costs of $4.9 million. The issuance costs are amortized as interest cost, and the carrying value of the 5.375% Senior Notes will accrete up to the face amount over the term of the notes. The Company recorded interest expense related to the 5.375% Senior Notes of $4.3 million

As part of the GFI acquisition, the Company assumed $240.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.375% Senior Notes due July 2018 (the “8.375% Senior Notes”). The carrying value of these notes as of September 30, 2017 was $243.6 million. Interest on these notes is payable, semi-annually in arrears on the 19th of January and July. Due to the cumulative effect of downgrades to the credit rating of GFI’s 8.375% Senior Notes, the 8.375% Senior Notes were subjected to 200 basis points penalty interest. On April 28, 2015, a subsidiary of the Company purchased from GFI approximately 43.0 million new shares of GFI common stock. This increased BGC’s ownership to approximately 67% of GFI’s outstanding common stock and gave the Company the ability to control the timing and process with respect to a full merger which was completed on January 12, 2016. Also on July 10, 2015, the Company guaranteed the obligations of GFI under the 8.375% Senior Notes. These actions resulted in upgrades of the credit ratings of GFI’s 8.375% Senior Notes by Moody’s Investors Service, Fitch Ratings Inc. and Standard & Poor’s, which reduced the penalty interest to 25 basis points effective July 19, 2015. In addition, on January 13, 2016, Moody’s further upgraded the credit rating on GFI’s 8.375% Senior Notes, eliminating the penalty interest. The Company recorded interest expense related to the 8.375% Senior Notes of $5.0 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. The Company recorded interest expense related to the 8.375% Senior Notes of $15.1 million for both the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

On May 27, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of $300.0 million principal amount of 5.125% Senior Notes due 2021 (the “5.125% Senior Notes”). The 5.125% Senior Notes are general senior unsecured obligations of the Company. These Senior Notes bear interest at a rate of 5.125% per year, payable in cash on May 27 and November 27 of each year, commencing November 27, 2016. The 5.125% Senior Notes will mature on May 27, 2021. The Company may redeem some or all of the notes at any time or from time to time for cash at certain “make-whole” redemption prices (as set forth in the Indenture). If a “Change of Control Triggering Event” (as defined in the Indenture) occurs, holders may require the Company to purchase all or a portion of their notes for cash at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the purchase date.

The initial carrying value of the 5.125% Senior Notes was $295.8 million, net of the discount and debt issuance costs of $4.2 million. The issuance costs are amortized as interest expense and the carrying value of the 5.125% Senior Notes will accrete up to the face amount over the term of the notes. The Company recorded interest expense related to the 5.125% Senior Notes of $4.0 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. The Company recorded interest expense related to the 5.125% Senior Notes of $12.1 million and $5.6 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

On July 29, 2011, the Company issued an aggregate of $160.0 million principal amount of 4.50% Convertible Notes due July 15, 2016. The Company recorded interest expense related to the 4.50% Convertible Notes of $0.5 million and $6.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. The Company did not record any interest expense related to the 4.50% Convertible Notes for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. On July 13, 2016, certain holders of the 4.50% Convertible Notes converted $68,000 in principal amount of notes, and, upon conversion, the Company delivered 6,909 shares of its Class A common stock to such holders. On July 15, 2016, the Company repaid the remaining approximately $159.9 million principal amount of its 4.50% Convertible Notes at maturity.

On March 13, 2015, the Company entered into a secured loan arrangement of $28.2 million under which it pledged certain fixed assets as security for a loan. This arrangement incurs interest at a fixed rate of 3.70% and matures on March 13, 2019. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had $10.9 million outstanding related to this secured loan arrangement, which includes $0.1 million of deferred financing costs. The value of the fixed assets pledged as of September 30, 2017 was $1.1 million. The Company recorded interest expense related to this secured loan arrangement of $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company recorded interest expense related to this secured loan arrangement of $0.4 million and $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

On May 31, 2017, the Company entered into a secured loan arrangement of $29.9 million under which it pledged certain fixed assets as security for a loan. This arrangement incurs interest at a fixed rate of 3.44% and matures on May 31, 2021. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had $28.2 million outstanding related to this secured loan arrangement. The value of the fixed assets pledged

as of September 30, 2017 was $21.6 million. The Company recorded interest expense related to this secured loan arrangement of $0.2 million and $0.3 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively.

On February 25, 2016, the Company entered into a committed unsecured credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and a syndicate of lenders. Several of the Company’s domestic non-regulated subsidiaries are parties to the credit agreement as guarantors. The credit agreement provides for revolving loans of $150.0 million, with the option to increase the aggregate loans to $200.0 million. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at either LIBOR or a defined base rate plus an additional margin which ranges from 50 basis points to 250 basis points depending on the Company’s debt rating as determined by S&P and Fitch and whether such loan is a LIBOR loan or a base rate loan. This facility was terminated on September 8, 2017, at which point the outstanding balance of $150.0 million was repaid. There were no borrowings outstanding under the facility as of September 30, 2017 and as of December 31, 2016. For the three months ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, the Company recorded interest expense related to the credit facility of $1.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded interest expense related to the credit facility of $2.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

On August 22, 2017, the Company entered into a committed unsecured loan agreement with Itau Unibanco S.A. The credit agreement provides for short term loans of up to $6.3 million (BRL 20.0 million). The maturity date of the agreement is February 19, 2018. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at the Brazilian Interbank offering rate plus 3.30%. As of September 30, 2017, there were $6.3 million of borrowings outstanding under the facility. As of September 30, 2017, the interest rate was 12.92%. The Company recorded interest expense related to the loan of $0.1 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

On August 23, 2017, the Company entered into a committed unsecured credit agreement with Itau Unibanco S.A. The credit agreement provides for an intra-day overdraft credit line up to $15.8 million (BRL 50.0 million). The maturity date of the agreement is December 14, 2017. This facility bears a fee of 1.00% per year. As of September 30, 2017, there were no borrowings outstanding under this facility. The Company recorded bank fees related to the agreement of $0.1 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

The Company’s Compensation Committee may grant various equity-based and partnership awards, including restricted stock units, restricted stock, stock options, limited partnership units and exchange rights for shares of the Company’s Class A common stock upon exchange of limited partnership units. On June 22, 2016, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company, the stockholders approved the Seventh Amended and Restated Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”) to increase from 350 million to 400 million the aggregate number of shares of Class A common stock of the Company that may be delivered or cash-settled pursuant to awards granted during the life of the Equity Plan. As of September 30, 2017, the limit on the aggregate number of shares authorized to be delivered allowed for the grant of future awards relating to 199.2 million shares. Upon vesting of RSUs, issuance of restricted stock, exercise of employee stock options and exchange of limited partnership units, the Company generally issues new shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. On June 6, 2017, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company, the Company’s stockholders approved the Company’s Second Amended and Restated Incentive Bonus Compensation Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) to approve the material terms of the performance goals under the Incentive Plan for compliance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, including an amendment to those performance goals in order to broaden the stock price performance goal to include dividends and/or total stockholder return.

A summary of the activity associated with limited partnership units is as follows:

During the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company granted exchangeability on 1.8 million and 4.6 million limited partnership units for which the Company incurred non-cash compensation expense of $19.8 million and $34.3

million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company granted exchangeability on 10.7 million and 11.1 million limited partnership units for which the Company incurred non-cash compensation expense of $111.9 million and $92.7 million, respectively. This expense is included within “Allocations of net income and grant of exchangeability to limited partnership units and FPUs” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the number of limited partnership units exchangeable into shares of Class A common stock at the discretion of the unit holder was 16.5 million and 13.9 million, respectively.

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the notional value of the limited partnership units with a post-termination pay-out amount held by executives and non-executive employees, awarded in lieu of cash compensation for salaries, commissions and/or discretionary or guaranteed bonuses, was approximately $225.7 million and $155.6 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the aggregate estimated fair value of these limited partnership units was approximately $42.6 million and $26.2 million, respectively. The number of outstanding limited partnership units with a post-termination pay-out as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was approximately 23.2 million and 17.0 million, respectively, of which approximately 13.5 million and 11.2 million were unvested. The liability for limited partnership units with a post-termination payout is included in “Accrued compensation” on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.

Certain of the limited partnership units with a post-termination pay-out have been granted in connection with the Company’s acquisitions. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the aggregate estimated fair value of these acquisition-related limited partnership units was $23.4 million and $20.3 million, respectively. The liability for such acquisition-related limited partnership units is included in “Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities” on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.

Compensation expense related to limited partnership units with a post-termination pay-out amount or a stated vesting schedule is recognized over the stated service period or stated vesting schedule. These units generally vest between three and five years from the date of grant. The Company recognized compensation expense related to these limited partnership units of $6.6 million and $6.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company recognized compensation expense related to these limited partnership units of $19.0 million and $13.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These are included in “Compensation and employee benefits” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Certain limited partnership units generally receive quarterly allocations of net income, which are cash distributed on a quarterly basis and generally contingent upon services being provided by the unit holders. The allocation of income to limited partnership units and FPUs was $28.6 million and $24.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The allocation of income to limited partnership units and FPUs was $50.0 million and $40.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. This expense is included within “Allocations of net income and grant of exchangeability to limited partnership units and FPUs” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The fair value of RSUs awarded to employees and directors is determined on the date of grant based on the market value of Class A common stock (adjusted if appropriate based upon the award’s eligibility to receive dividends), and is recognized, net of the effect of estimated forfeitures, ratably over the vesting period. The Company uses historical data, including historical forfeitures and turnover rates, to estimate expected forfeiture rates for both employee and director RSUs. Each RSU is settled in one share of Class A common stock upon completion of the vesting period.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company granted 0.8 million and 0.8 million, respectively, of RSUs with aggregate estimated grant date fair values of approximately $7.8 million and $6.2 million, respectively, to employees and directors. These RSUs were awarded in lieu of cash compensation for salaries, commissions and/or discretionary or guaranteed bonuses. RSUs granted to these individuals generally vest over a two- to four-year period.

For RSUs that vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company withheld shares valued at $2.3 million and $1.3 million to pay taxes due at the time of vesting.

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the aggregate estimated grant date fair value of outstanding RSUs was approximately $12.5 million and $10.6 million, respectively.

Compensation expense related to RSUs was approximately $1.6 million and $1.2 million, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. Compensation expense related to RSUs was approximately $4.3 million and $4.0 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. As of September 30, 2017, there was approximately $11.3 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested RSUs.

The Company has granted restricted shares under its Equity Plan. Such restricted shares are generally saleable by partners in five to ten years. Partners who agree to extend the length of their employment agreements and/or other contractual modifications sought by the Company are expected to be able to sell their restricted shares over a shorter time period. Transferability of the shares of restricted stock is not subject to continued employment or service with the Company or any affiliate or subsidiary of the Company; however, transferability is subject to compliance with BGC Partners’ and its affiliates’ customary noncompete obligations. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, approximately 107 thousand shares and 59 thousand shares, respectively, were forfeited in connection with this clause. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company released the restrictions with respect to approximately 2.1 million and 4.4 million of such shares, respectively. As of September 30, 2017, there were 10.0 million of such restricted shares outstanding.

During the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company granted approximately 0.2 million restricted shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. In connection with those grants, an equivalent number of limited partnership units were surrendered. Such restricted shares are saleable ratably over a period of four years. Transferability of the shares is subject to compliance with BGC Partners’ and its affiliates’ customary noncompete obligations. For the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recognized compensation expense of approximately $1.6 million related to the grant of these restricted shares.

The Company maintains a Deferred Cash Award Program which provides for the grant of deferred cash incentive compensation to eligible employees. The Company may pay certain bonuses in the form of deferred cash compensation awards, which generally vest over a future service period. In addition, prior to the completion of the tender offer, GFI’s outstanding RSUs were converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to $6.10 per unit, with such cash payable on and subject to the terms and conditions of the original vesting schedule of each RSU. The total compensation expense, net of forfeitures, recognized in relation to the deferred cash compensation awards for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $1.0 million and $3.5 million, respectively. The total compensation expense, net of forfeitures, recognized in relation to the deferred cash compensation awards for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $7.2 million and $13.3 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2017, the total liability for the deferred cash compensation awards was $12.0 million, which is included in “Accrued compensation” on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. Total unrecognized compensation cost related to deferred cash compensation, prior to the consideration of forfeitures, was approximately $7.7 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.98 years. The Company also maintains a similar deferred cash award program for Berkeley Point, in which it pays certain bonuses in the form of deferred cash compensation awards, which also generally vest over a future service period. The total compensation expense recognized in relation to Berkeley Point’s deferred cash compensation awards was ($0.3) million and $0.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and $0.3 million and $1.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the total liability for the deferred cash compensation awards was $1.8 million and $2.6 million, respectively, which is included in “Accrued compensation” on the Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition.

There were no stock options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 250 thousand stock options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. The Company did not grant any stock options during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

The Company did not record any compensation expense related to stock options for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2017 or 2016, as all of these options had vested in prior years. As of September 30, 2017, all of the compensation expense related to stock options was fully recognized

In the ordinary course of business, various legal actions are brought and are pending against the Company and its subsidiaries in the U.S. and internationally. In some of these actions, substantial amounts are claimed. The Company is also involved, from time to time, in reviews, examinations, investigations and proceedings by governmental and self-regulatory agencies (both formal and informal) regarding the Company’s businesses, which may result in judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other relief. The following generally does not include matters that the Company has pending against other parties which, if successful, would result in awards in favor of the Company or its subsidiaries.

From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries are involved in litigation, claims and arbitrations in the U.S. and internationally, relating to, inter alia, various employment matters, including with respect to termination of employment, hiring of employees currently or previously employed by competitors, terms and conditions of employment and other matters. In light of the competitive nature of the brokerage industry, litigation, claims and arbitration between competitors regarding employee hiring are not uncommon. The Company is also involved, from time to time, in other reviews, investigations and proceedings by governmental and self-regulatory agencies (both formal and informal) regarding the Company’s business. Any such actions may result in judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other relief.

Legal reserves are established in accordance with FASB guidance on Accounting for Contingencies, when a material legal liability is both probable and reasonably estimable. Once established, reserves are adjusted when there is more information available or when an event occurs requiring a change. The outcome of such items cannot be determined with certainty. The Company is unable to estimate a possible loss or range of loss in connection with specific matters beyond its current accrual and any other amounts disclosed. Management believes that, based on currently available information, the final outcome of these current pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosures taken as a whole.

The Company has irrevocable uncollateralized letters of credit with various banks, where the beneficiaries are clearing organizations through which it transacted, that are used in lieu of margin and deposits with those clearing organizations. As of September 30, 2017, the Company was contingently liable for $1.3 million under these letters of credit.

The Company generates revenues by providing financial intermediary, securities trading and brokerage activities, and commercial real estate services to institutional customers and by executing and, in some cases, clearing transactions for institutional counterparties. Revenues for these services are transaction-based. As a result, revenues could vary based on the transaction volume of global financial and real estate markets. Additionally, financing is sensitive to interest rate fluctuations, which could have an impact on the Company’s overall profitability.

The Company is self-insured for health care claims, up to a stop-loss amount for eligible participating employees and qualified dependents in the United States, subject to deductibles and limitations. The Company’s liability for claims incurred but not reported is determined based on an estimate of the ultimate aggregate liability for claims incurred. The estimate is calculated from actual claim rates and adjusted periodically as necessary. The Company has accrued $4.7 million in health care claims as of September 30, 2017. The Company does not expect the impact of the health care claims to have a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

The Company provides guarantees to securities clearinghouses and exchanges which meet the definition of a guarantee under FASB interpretations. Under these standard securities clearinghouse and exchange membership agreements, members are required to guarantee, collectively, the performance of other members and, accordingly, if another member becomes unable to satisfy its obligations to the clearinghouse or exchange, all other members would be required to meet the shortfall. In the opinion of management, the Company’s liability under these agreements is not quantifiable and could exceed the cash and securities it has posted as collateral. However, the potential of being required to make payments under these arrangements is remote. Accordingly, no contingent liability has been recorded in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition for these agreements.

In connection with the sale of eSpeed, the Company has indemnified Nasdaq for amounts over a defined threshold against damages arising from breaches of representations, warranties and covenants. In addition, in connection with the acquisition of GFI, the Company has indemnified the directors and officers of GFI. As of September 30, 2017, no contingent liability has been recorded in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition for these indemnifications, as the potential for being required to make payments under these indemnifications is remote.

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company was committed to fund approximately $286 million and $207 million, respectively, which is the total remaining draws on construction loans originated by the Company under the HUD 221(d)4, 220 and 232 programs, rate locked loans that have not been funded, forward commitments, as well as the funding for credit facilities. In addition, the Company has corresponding commitments to sell these loans to various investors as they are funded.

The Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include U.S. federal, state and local income taxes on the Company’s allocable share of the U.S. results of operations, as well as taxes payable to jurisdictions outside the U.S. In addition, certain of the Company’s entities are taxed as U.S. partnerships and are subject to the Unincorporated Business Tax (“UBT”) in New York City. Therefore, the tax liability or benefit related to the partnership income or loss, except for UBT, rests with the partners (see Note 2—“Limited Partnership Interests in BGC Holdings” for discussion of partnership interests), rather than the partnership entity. Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method, as prescribed in FASB guidance on Accounting for Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if it is deemed more likely than not that those assets will not be realized.

As of September 30, 2017, the Company had $519.8 million of undistributed foreign pre-tax earnings, which excludes the cash proceeds from the sale of Trayport. Except for the cash proceeds from the sale of Trayport, it is the Company’s intention to

permanently reinvest these undistributed foreign pre-tax earnings in the Company’s foreign operations. It is not practicable to determine the amount of additional tax that may be payable in the event these earnings are repatriated due to the fluctuation of the relative ownership percentages of the foreign subsidiaries between the Company and BGC Holdings, L.P. For the cash proceeds which are not permanently reinvested, the accrued tax liability is $135.5 million, net of foreign tax credits. In addition, certain GFI net operating loss carryforwards are expected to be utilized to reduce cash taxes. Taking these items together, we therefore expect to pay effective cash taxes of no more than $64 million related to the Trayport transaction

Pursuant to FASB guidance on Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, the Company provides for uncertain tax positions based upon management’s assessment of whether a tax benefit is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had $3.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits, all of which would affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized. As of December 31, 2016, the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits, excluding related interest and penalties, were $3.1 million, all of which, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters in “Interest expense” and “Other expenses,” respectively, in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had approximately $0.3 million of accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions. As of December 31, 2016, there were $0.3 million of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

The Company shares risk of loss for loans originated under the Fannie Mae DUS and Freddie Mac TAH programs and could incur losses in the event of defaults under or foreclosure of these loans. Under the guarantee, the Company’s maximum contingent liability to the extent of actual losses incurred is approximately 33% of the outstanding principal balance on Fannie Mae DUS or Freddie TAH loans. Risk sharing percentages are established on a loan by loan basis when originated with most loans at 33% and “modified” loans at lower percentages. Under certain circumstances, risk sharing percentages can be revised subsequent to origination or the Company could be required to repurchase the loan. In the event of a loss resulting from a catastrophic event that is not required to be covered by borrowers’ insurance policies, the Company can recover the loss under its mortgage impairment insurance policy. Any potential recovery is subject to the policy’s deductibles and limits.

As of September 30, 2017, the credit risk loans being serviced by the Company on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had outstanding principal balances of approximately $18.3 billion with a maximum potential loss of approximately $5.2 billion, of which $1.3 billion is covered by the Credit Enhancement Agreement (see Note 14—“Credit Enhancement Receivable, Contingent Liability and Credit Enhancement Deposit”).

As of December 31, 2016, the credit risk loans being serviced by the Company on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had outstanding principal balances of approximately $16.9 billion with a maximum potential loss of approximately $4.7 billion, of which $1.6 billion is covered by the Credit Enhancement Agreement (see Note 14—“Credit Enhancement Receivable, Contingent Liability and Credit Enhancement Deposit”).

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the estimated liability under the guarantee liability, included as part of “Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities” in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition, was as follows (in thousands):

In order to monitor and mitigate potential losses, the Company uses an internally developed loan rating scorecard for determining which loans meet the Company’s criteria to be placed on a watch list. The Company also calculates default probabilities based on internal ratings and expected losses on a loan by loan basis. This methodology uses a number of factors including, but not limited to, debt service coverage ratios, collateral valuation, the condition of the underlying assets, borrower strength and market conditions.

See Note 14—“Credit Enhancement Receivable, Contingent Liability and Credit Enhancement Deposit” for further explanation of credit protection provided by DB Cayman. The provisions for risk sharing, included in “Other expenses” in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations, was as follows (in thousands):

The lending activities of the Company create credit risk in the event that counterparties do not fulfill their contractual payment obligations. In particular, the Company is exposed to credit risk related to the Fannie Mae DUS and Freddie Mac TAH loans. As of September 30, 2017, 27% of $5.2 billion of the maximum loss was for properties located in California. As of December 31, 2016, 29% of $4.7 billion of the maximum loss was for properties located in California. See Note 25—“Financial Guarantee Liability” for additional information.

In conjunction with the servicing of multi-family and commercial loans, the Company holds escrow and other custodial funds. Escrow funds are held at unaffiliated financial institutions generally in the form of cash and cash equivalents. These funds amounted to approximately $1.1 billion, as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. These funds are held for the benefit of the Company’s borrowers and are segregated in custodial bank accounts. These amounts are excluded from the assets and liabilities of the Company.

Many of the Company’s businesses are subject to regulatory restrictions and minimum capital requirements. These regulatory restrictions and capital requirements may restrict the Company’s ability to withdraw capital from its subsidiaries.

Certain U.S. subsidiaries of the Company are registered as U.S. broker-dealers or Futures Commissions Merchants subject to Rule 15c3-1 of the SEC and Rule 1.17 of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which specify uniform minimum net capital requirements, as defined, for their registrants, and also require a significant part of the registrants’ assets be kept in relatively liquid form. As of September 30, 2017, the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries had net capital in excess of their minimum capital requirements.

Certain European subsidiaries of the Company are regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”) and must maintain financial resources (as defined by the FCA) in excess of the total financial resources requirement of the FCA. As of September 30, 2017, the European subsidiaries had financial resources in excess of their requirements.

Certain other subsidiaries of the Company are subject to regulatory and other requirements of the jurisdictions in which they operate.

In addition, the Company’s Swap Execution Facilities (“SEFs”), BGC Derivative Markets and GFI Swaps Exchange, are required to maintain financial resources to cover operating costs for at least one year, keeping at least enough cash or highly liquid securities to cover six months’ operating costs.

The regulatory requirements referred to above may restrict the Company’s ability to withdraw capital from its regulated subsidiaries. As of September 30, 2017, $547.7 million of net assets were held by regulated subsidiaries. These subsidiaries had aggregate regulatory net capital, as defined, in excess of the aggregate regulatory requirements, as defined, of $296.2 million.

As a result of the Berkeley Point Acquisition, the Company is now subject to various capital requirements in connection with seller/servicer agreements that the Company has entered into with the various GSEs. Failure to maintain minimum capital requirements could result in the Company’s inability to originate and service loans for the respective GSEs and could have a direct material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Management believes that as of September 30, 2017, that the Company met all capital requirements. As of September 30, 2017, the most restrictive capital requirement was Fannie Mae’s net worth requirement. The Company exceeded the minimum requirement by $368.0 million.

Certain of the Company’s agreements with Fannie Mae allow the Company to originate and service loans under Fannie Mae’s DUS Program. These agreements require the Company to maintain sufficient collateral to meet Fannie Mae’s restricted and operational liquidity requirements based on a pre-established formula. Certain of the Company’s agreements with Freddie Mac allow the Company to service loans under Freddie Mac’s TAH Program. These agreements require the Company to pledge sufficient collateral to meet Freddie Mac’s liquidity requirement of 8% of the outstanding principal of TAH loans serviced by the Company. Management believes that as of September 30, 2017 that the Company met all liquidity requirements.

In addition, as a servicer for Fannie Mae, GNMA and FHA, the Company is required to advance to investors any uncollected principal and interest due from borrowers. As of December 31, 2016, outstanding borrower advances were approximately $106 thousand, and are included in “Other assets” in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition. There were no outstanding advances as of September 30, 2017.

The Company’s business segments are determined based on the products and services provided and reflect the manner in which financial information is evaluated by management. The Company’s operations consist of two reportable segments, Financial Services and Real Estate Services.

The Company’s Financial Services segment specializes in the brokerage of a broad range of products, including fixed income (rates and credit), foreign exchange, equities, insurance, energy and commodities, and futures. It also provides a wide range of services, including trade execution, broker-dealer services, clearing, trade compression, post trade, information, and other back-office services to a broad range of financial and non-financial institutions. The Company’s Real Estate Services segment offers commercial real estate tenants, owners, investors and developers a wide range of services, including leasing and corporate advisory, investment sales and real estate finance, consulting, project and development management, property and facilities management, and multifamily lending through government-sponsored and government-funded loan programs, as well as the servicing of the loans that it originates and other commercial real estate loans.

The Company evaluates the performance and reviews the results of the segments based on each segment’s “Income (loss) from operations before income taxes.”

The amounts shown below for the Financial Services and Real Estate Services segments reflect the amounts that are used by management to allocate resources and assess performance, which is based on each segment’s “Income (loss) from operations before income taxes.” In addition to the two business segments, the tables below include a “Corporate Items” category. Corporate revenues include fees from related parties and interest income. Corporate expenses include non-cash compensation expenses (such as the grant of exchangeability to limited partnership units; redemption/exchange of partnership units, issuance of restricted shares and a reserve on compensation-related partnership loans; and allocations of net income to limited partnership units and FPUs), as well as unallocated expenses, such as certain professional and consulting fees, executive compensation and interest expense, which are managed separately at the corporate level. Corporate other income (losses), net includes gains that are not considered part of the Company’s ordinary, ongoing business, and the adjustment of future earn-out payments.

During the third quarter of 2017, the Company transferred the right to receive earn-out payments from Nasdaq from the Financial Services segment to the Real Estate Services segment. As a result, the Nasdaq payment for the third quarter of 2017 was recorded as “Other income (loss)” in the Real Estate Services segment.

Certain financial information for the Company’s segments is presented below. Certain reclassifications have been made to previously reported amounts to conform to the current presentation (see Note 1—“Organization and Basis of Presentation”). See Note 20—“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, Net,” for goodwill by reportable segment.

	Financial Services		Real Estate Services		Corporate Items			Total
Brokerage revenues:
Rates	$	123,041	$	—	$	—		$	123,041
Credit		66,133		—		—			66,133
Foreign exchange		83,899		—		—			83,899
Energy and commodities		48,231		—		—			48,231
Equities, insurance, and other asset classes		79,657		—		—			79,657
Leasing and other services		—		158,604		—			158,604
Real estate capital markets		—		98,307		—			98,307
Gains from mortgage banking activities, net		—		45,455		—			45,455
Real estate management and other services		—		60,798		—			60,798
Servicing fees		—		29,057		—			29,057
Fees from related parties		—		240		6,933			7,173
Data, software and post-trade		13,776		—		—			13,776
Other revenues		1,096		40		35			1,171
Total non-interest revenues		415,833		392,501		6,968			815,302
Interest income		824		6,915		3,987			11,726
Total revenues		416,657		399,416		10,955			827,028
Interest expense		—		4,437		19,988			24,425
Non-interest expenses		338,440		322,929		89,178			750,547
Total expenses		338,440		327,366		109,166			774,972
Other income (losses), net:
Gain (loss) on divestiture and sale of investments		—		—		4			4
Gains (losses) on equity investments		—		—		2,147			2,147
Other income (losses)		12,128		76,968		(901	)		88,195
Total other income (losses), net		12,128		76,968		1,250			90,346
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes	$	90,345	$	149,018	$	(96,961	)	$	142,402

	Financial Services		Real Estate Services		Corporate Items			Total
Brokerage revenues:
Rates	$	112,384	$	—	$	—		$	112,384
Credit		67,221		—		—			67,221
Foreign exchange		73,191		—		—			73,191
Energy and commodities		47,061		—		—			47,061
Equities, insurance, and other asset classes		39,076		—		—			39,076
Leasing and other services		—		139,109		—			139,109
Real estate capital markets		—		91,098		—			91,098
Gains from mortgage banking activities, net		—		65,377		—			65,377
Real estate management and other services		—		49,373		—			49,373
Servicing fees		—		22,502		—			22,502
Fees from related parties		—		228		6,126			6,354
Data, software and post-trade		13,266		—		—			13,266
Other revenues		645		13		138			796
Total non-interest revenues		352,844		367,700		6,264			726,808
Interest income		743		6,151		1,118			8,012
Total revenues		353,587		373,851		7,382			734,820
Interest expense		—		2,230		16,601			18,831
Non-interest expenses		294,763		290,606		85,539			670,908
Total expenses		294,763		292,836		102,140			689,739
Other income (losses), net:
Gain (loss) on divestiture and sale of investments		—		—		7,044			7,044
Gains (losses) on equity investments		—		—		796			796
Other income (losses)		69,893		—		21,762			91,655
Total other income (losses), net		69,893		—		29,602			99,495
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes	$	128,717	$	81,015	$	(65,156	)	$	144,576

	Financial Services		Real Estate Services		Corporate Items			Total
Brokerage revenues:
Rates	$	392,262	$	—	$	—		$	392,262
Credit		218,733		—		—			218,733
Foreign exchange		243,606		—		—			243,606
Energy and commodities		149,855		—		—			149,855
Equities, insurance, and other asset classes		240,687		—		—			240,687
Leasing and other services		—		430,859		—			430,859
Real estate capital markets		—		270,865		—			270,865
Gains from mortgage banking activities, net		—		164,263		—			164,263
Real estate management and other services		—		163,017		—			163,017
Servicing fees		—		80,729		—			80,729
Fees from related parties		—		1,055		19,074			20,129
Data, software and post-trade		40,185		—		—			40,185
Other revenues		2,693		172		158			3,023
Total non-interest revenues		1,288,021		1,110,960		19,232			2,418,213
Interest income		2,131		28,419		10,359			40,909
Total revenues		1,290,152		1,139,379		29,591			2,459,122
Interest expense		—		15,765		53,913			69,678
Non-interest expenses		1,043,925		915,983		237,532			2,197,440
Total expenses		1,043,925		931,748		291,445			2,267,118
Other income (losses), net:
Gain (loss) on divestiture and sale of investments		—		—		561			561
Gains (losses) on equity investments		—		—		3,986			3,986
Other income (losses)		20,845		76,968		115			97,928
Total other income (losses), net		20,845		76,968		4,662			102,475
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes	$	267,072	$	284,599	$	(257,192	)	$	294,479

	Financial Services		Real Estate Services		Corporate Items			Total
Brokerage revenues:
Rates	$	352,681	$	—	$	—		$	352,681
Credit		229,466		—		—			229,466
Foreign exchange		232,494		—		—			232,494
Energy and commodities		168,765		—		—			168,765
Equities, insurance, and other asset classes		133,035		—		—			133,035
Leasing and other services	—			369,291		—			369,291
Real estate capital markets	—			234,780		—			234,780
Gains from mortgage banking activities, net		—		139,009		—			139,009
Real estate management and other services	—			140,960		—			140,960
Servicing fees		—		62,199		—			62,199
Fees from related parties	—			1,025		18,061			19,086
Data, software and post-trade		41,360		—		—			41,360
Other revenues		4,238		89		553			4,880
Total non-interest revenues		1,162,039		947,353		18,614			2,128,006
Interest income		1,895		17,761		4,676			24,332
Total revenues		1,163,934		965,114		23,290			2,152,338
Interest expense		—		8,937		44,833			53,770
Non-interest expenses		980,635		794,099		198,424			1,973,158
Total expenses		980,635		803,036		243,257			2,026,928
Other income (losses), net:
Gain (loss) on divestiture and sale of investments		—		—		7,044			7,044
Gains (losses) on equity investments		—		—		2,547			2,547
Other income (losses)		79,539		—		18,653			98,192
Total other income (losses), net		79,539		—		28,244			107,783
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes	$	262,838	$	162,078	$	(191,723	)	$	233,193

The Company offers products and services in the U.S., U.K., Asia (including Australia), Other Europe, the Middle East and Africa region (defined as the “MEA” region), France, and Other Americas. Information regarding revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, is as follows (in thousands):

Information regarding long-lived assets (defined as loans, forgivable loans and other receivables from employees and partners, net; fixed assets, net; certain other investments; goodwill; other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization; and rent and other deposits) in the geographic areas as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, is as follows (in thousands):

On October 25, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.18 per share for the third quarter of 2017, payable on November 29, 2017 to Class A and Class B common stockholders of record as of November 14, 2017.

Since September 30, 2017, the Company has sold, pursuant to the November 2014 Sales Agreement and the April 2017 Sales Agreement, 1.1 million shares of Class A common stock related to redemptions and exchanges of limited partnership interests in BGC Holdings.

On November 7, 2017, the Company issued exchange rights with respect to, and Cantor purchased, in transactions exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, an aggregate of 1,179,788 exchangeable limited partnership units in BGC Holdings, as follows: In connection with the redemption by BGC Holdings of an aggregate of 823,178 non-exchangeable founding partner units from founding partners of BGC Holdings for an aggregate consideration of $2,828,629, Cantor purchased 823,178 exchangeable limited partnership units from BGC Holdings for an aggregate of $2,828,629. In addition, pursuant to the Sixth Amendment, on November 7, 2017, Cantor purchased 356,610 exchangeable limited partnership units from BGC Holdings for an aggregate consideration of $1,091,175 in connection with the grant of exchangeability and exchange for 356,610 founding partner units.

The following discussion of BGC Partners, Inc.’s financial condition and results of operations should be read together with BGC Partners, Inc.’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes to those statements, as well as the cautionary statements relating to forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), included in this report. When used herein, the terms “BGC Partners,” “BGC,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to BGC Partners, Inc., including consolidated subsidiaries.

This discussion summarizes the significant factors affecting our results of operations and financial condition during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. This discussion is provided to increase the understanding of, and should be read in conjunction with, our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.

We are a leading global brokerage company servicing the financial and real estate markets through our Financial Services and Real Estate Services businesses. Through our financial service brands, including BGC, GFI, Sunrise, Besso, and R.P. Martin, among others, our Financial Services business specializes in the brokerage of a broad range of products, including fixed income (rates and credit), foreign exchange, equities, energy and commodities, insurance, and futures. Our Financial Services business also provides a wide range of services, including trade execution, broker-dealer services, clearing, trade compression, post trade, information, and other back-office services to a broad range of financial and non-financial institutions. Our integrated platform is designed to provide flexibility to customers with regard to price discovery, execution and processing of transactions, and enables them to use voice, hybrid, or in many markets, fully electronic brokerage services in connection with transactions executed either over-the-counter (“OTC”) or through an exchange. Through our electronic brands including FENICS, BGC Trader, FENICS Market Data, Capitalab and Lucera, we offer fully electronic brokerage, financial technology solutions, market data, post-trade services and analytics related to financial instruments and markets.

Newmark is our leading commercial real estate services business. Newmark operates through brands including Newmark Knight Frank, Newmark Cornish & Carey, Berkeley Point, ARA, Computerized Facility Integration, NKF Valuation & Advisory, and Excess Space. Under these names and others, Newmark provides a wide range of commercial real estate services, including leasing and corporate advisory, investment sales, commercial mortgage and finance brokerage, consulting, project and development management, property and facilities management, and multifamily lending through government-sponsored and government-funded loan programs, as well as the servicing of the loans that it originates and other commercial real estate loans.

Newmark is a rapidly growing, high margin, full-service commercial real estate services business that offers a full suite of services and products for both owners and occupiers across the entire commercial real estate industry. Our investor/owner services and products include capital markets, which consists of investment sales, debt and structured finance and loan sales, agency leasing, property management, valuation and advisory, diligence and underwriting and government sponsored entity (which we refer to as “GSE”) lending and loan servicing. Our occupier services and products include tenant representation, real estate management technology systems, workplace and occupancy strategy, global corporate consulting, project management, lease administration and facilities management. We enhance these services and products through innovative real estate technology solutions and data analytics that enable our clients to increase their efficiency and profits. We have relationships with many of the world’s largest commercial property owners, real estate developers and investors, as well as Fortune 500 and Forbes Global 2000 companies.

Our customers include many of the world’s largest banks, broker-dealers, investment banks, trading firms, hedge funds, governments, corporations, property owners, real estate developers, and investment firms. We have more than 100 offices globally in major markets including New York and London, as well as in Atlanta, Beijing, Bogotá, Boston, Buenos Aires, Charlotte, Chicago, Copenhagen, Dallas, Denver, Dubai, Dublin, Geneva, Hong Kong, Houston, Istanbul, Johannesburg, Los Angeles, Madrid, Mexico City, Miami, Moscow, Nyon, Paris, Philadelphia, Rio de Janeiro, San Francisco, Santa Clara, Santiago, São Paulo, Seoul, Shanghai, Singapore, Sydney, Tel Aviv, Tokyo, Toronto, and Washington, D.C.

We remain confident in our future growth prospects as we continue to increase the scale and depth of our Financial Services and Real Estate Services platforms and continue to seek market-driven opportunities to expand our business in numerous financial asset classes and other products and services. This was exemplified by our acquisition of GFI Group, Inc. (“GFI”). Beginning in the first quarter of 2015, BGC began consolidating the results of GFI, which continues to operate as a separately branded division of BGC. On January 12, 2016, we completed the merger with GFI by acquiring 100% of GFI’s outstanding shares (see “Acquisition of GFI Group, Inc.”). During 2016, we also completed the purchase of Sunrise Brokers Group (“Sunrise Brokers”) and several smaller companies. In the first quarter of 2017 we also acquired Besso Insurance Group Limited ("Besso"). By adding these and other leading companies to our platform, we have greatly broadened the scope and depth of services we can provide to our clients across our consolidated

business. We have also continued to make key hires around the world and integrate our recent acquisitions onto our global platform. We expect these additions to increase our revenues and earnings per share going forward. These investments underscore BGC’s ongoing commitment to make accretive acquisitions and profitable hires.

BGC, BGC Trader, GFI, FENICS, FENICS. COM, Capitalab, R.P. Martin, Sunrise, Besso, Swaptioniser, ColleX, Newmark, Grubb & Ellis, ARA, Computerized Facility Integration, Landauer, Lucera, Excess Space, Excess Space Retail Services, Inc., Berkeley Point, and Grubb are trademarks/service marks, and/or registered trademarks/service marks and/or service marks of BGC Partners, Inc. and/or its affiliates. Knight Frank is a service mark of Knight Frank (Nominees) Limited.

On July 18, 2017 the Company announced that it has agreed to acquire Berkeley Point Financial LLC and its subsidiary (together referred to as “Berkeley Point” or “BPF”) from an affiliate of Cantor. This affiliate of Cantor had acquired Berkeley Point on April 10, 2014. Berkeley Point is a leading commercial real estate finance company focused on the origination and sale of multifamily and other commercial real estate loans through government-sponsored and government-funded loan programs, as well as the servicing of commercial real estate loans, including those it originates. The Company’s Board of Directors, upon the unanimous recommendation of a Special Committee consisting of all four independent directors, assisted by independent advisors, unanimously approved the acquisition of Berkeley Point and the related transactions. The total consideration for the acquisition of Berkeley Point is $875 million, subject to certain adjustments at closing. We believe that the addition of Berkeley Point will significantly increase the scale and scope of our Real Estate Services business and generate substantial revenue synergies.

This transaction has been determined to be a combination of entities under common control that resulted in a change in the reporting entity. Accordingly, our financial results have been recast to include the financial results of Berkeley Point in the current and prior periods as of Berkeley Point had always been consolidated.

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2016						Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
	As Previously Reported		Retrospective Adjustments		As Adjusted		As Previously Reported		Retrospective Adjustments			As Adjusted
Total revenues	$	644,951	$	89,869	$	734,820	$	1,939,375	$	212,963		$	2,152,338
Total expenses		642,130		47,609		689,739		1,896,806		130,122			2,026,928
Total other income (losses), net		99,493		2		99,495		108,339		(556	)		107,783
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes		102,314		42,262		144,576		150,908		82,285			233,193
Consolidated net income (loss)		72,051		42,252		114,303		105,257		82,218			187,475
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries		12,626		14,466		27,092		18,860		28,032			46,892
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders		59,425		27,786		87,211		86,397		54,186			140,583
Basic earnings (loss) per share		0.21		0.10		0.31		0.31		0.20			0.51
Diluted earnings (loss) per share		0.21		0.10		0.31		0.31		0.19			0.50

In the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition, “Total assets” included $1,245.0 million as of September 30, 2017 related to Berkeley Point. In the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations, the

three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 included “Total revenues” of $78.7 million and $265.9 million, respectively, and “Income (loss) from operations before income taxes” of $27.8 million and $105.7 million, respectively, related to Berkeley Point.

Contemporaneously with the Berkeley Point Acquisition, on September 8, 2017, the Company invested $100 million in a newly formed commercial real estate-related financial and investment business, CF Real Estate Finance Holdings, L.P. (“Real Estate LP”), which is controlled and managed by Cantor. Real Estate LP may conduct activities in any real estate related business or asset backed securities-related business or any extensions thereof and ancillary activities thereto. As of September 30, 2017, the Company’s investment is accounted for under the equity method. An affiliate of Cantor will continue to bear the benefits and burdens of the special asset servicing portfolio of Berkeley Point; however, Berkeley Point will continue to hold the special servicing assets on its balance sheet until these assets are transferred to the Cantor affiliate at a later date in a future expected transaction. As of September 30, 2017, BPF’s special asset servicing business represented less than 10 percent of the notional value of Berkeley Point’s overall $58 billion servicing portfolio and an immaterial amount of BPF’s servicing fees.

On October 23, 2017, Newmark Group, Inc. filed a registration statement on Form S-1 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) relating to the proposed initial public offering of the Class A common stock of Newmark Group, Inc., a newly formed subsidiary that will hold our Real Estate Services business, which operates as “Newmark,” “Newmark Knight Frank,” or “NKF.”

The number of Class A shares to be offered and the price range for the proposed offering have not yet been determined. The initial public offering is part of our plan to separate our Real Estate Services business into a separate public company. Following some period after the expected offering, we may, subject to market and other conditions, distribute the shares that we will hold of the newly formed subsidiary pro rata to our stockholders in a manner intended to qualify as tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

On November 4, 2016, we acquired from Cantor the 80% of the Lucera business (also known as “LFI Holdings, LLC” or “LFI”) not already owned by us. Lucera is a technology infrastructure provider tailored to the financial sector headquartered in New York. The acquisition was determined to be a combination of entities under common control that resulted in a change in the reporting entity. Accordingly, our financial results have been recast to include those of Lucera from its formation in 2013 as if it had always been consolidated.

On January 12, 2016, we completed our acquisition (the “JPI Merger”) of Jersey Partners, Inc. (“JPI”). The JPI Merger occurred pursuant to a merger agreement, dated as of December 22, 2015. Shortly following the completion of the JPI Merger, a subsidiary of BGC merged with and into GFI pursuant to a short-form merger under Delaware law, with GFI continuing as the surviving entity. The back-end mergers, (the “Back-End Mergers”) pursuant to the tender offer agreement allowed BGC to acquire the remaining approximately 33% of the outstanding shares of GFI common stock that BGC did not already own. Following the closing of the Back-End Mergers, BGC and its affiliates now own 100% of the outstanding shares of GFI’s common stock. In total, approximately 23.5 million shares of BGC Class A common stock were issued and $111.2 million in cash will be paid with respect to the closing of the Back-End Mergers, inclusive of adjustments ($89.9 million has been paid as of September 30, 2017).

We believe the combination of BGC and GFI creates a strong and diversified Financial Services business, well-positioned to capture future growth opportunities. Through this combination, we expect to deliver substantial benefits to customers of the combined company, and we expect to become the largest and most profitable wholesale financial brokerage company. We also believe this is a highly complementary combination, which has resulted, and will continue to result, in meaningful economies of scale. While the front-office operations will remain separately branded divisions, the back office, technology, and infrastructure of these two companies are being integrated in a smart and deliberate way.

As we continue to focus our efforts on converting voice and hybrid desks to electronic execution, our higher margin fully electronic businesses, which generated $218.5 million of net revenues during the most recent trailing twelve-month period ended September 30, 2017, an increase of 4.3% from a year ago. These fully electronic revenues are more than double the annualized revenues of eSpeed, which generated $48.6 million in revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and was sold in the second quarter of 2013 for $1.2 billion (based on the value of Nasdaq stock at the time the deal was announced). In addition, as part of the sale of eSpeed to Nasdaq, we expect to receive an earn out of up to 14,883,705 shares of Nasdaq common stock to be paid ratably in each of the fifteen years following the closing in which the consolidated gross revenue of Nasdaq is equal to or greater than

$25 million. Through September 30, 2017, we have received 4,961,235 shares of Nasdaq common stock in accordance with the agreement. The contingent future issuances of Nasdaq common stock are also subject to acceleration upon the occurrence of certain events.

For the purposes of this document and subsequent Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings, all of our fully electronic businesses are referred to as “FENICS.” These offerings include Financial Services segment fully electronic brokerage products, as well as offerings in market data, software solutions, and post-trade services across both BGC and GFI. FENICS historical results do not include the results of eSpeed or those of Trayport, either before or after the completed sale to Intercontinental Exchange (“ICE”).

The financial intermediary sector has been a competitive area that grew over the period between 1998 and 2007 due to several factors. One factor was the increasing use of derivatives to manage risk or to take advantage of the anticipated direction of a market by allowing users to protect gains and/or guard against losses in the price of underlying assets without having to buy or sell the underlying assets. Derivatives are often used to mitigate the risks associated with interest rates, equity ownership, changes in the value of foreign currency, credit defaults by corporate and sovereign debtors and changes in the prices of commodity products. Over this same timeframe, demand from financial institutions, financial services intermediaries and large corporations had increased volumes in the wholesale derivatives market, thereby increasing the business opportunity for financial intermediaries.

Another key factor in the growth of the financial intermediary sector between 1998 and 2007 was the increase in the number of new financial products. As market participants and their customers strive to mitigate risk, new types of equity and fixed income securities, futures, options and other financial instruments have been developed. Most of these new securities and derivatives were not immediately ready for more liquid and standardized electronic markets, and generally increased the need for trading and required broker-assisted execution.

Due largely to the impacts of the global financial crises of 2008-2009, our Financial Services businesses had faced more challenging market conditions from 2009 until the second half of 2016, Accommodative monetary policies were enacted by several major central banks including the Federal Reserve, Bank of England, Bank of Japan and the European Central Bank in response to the global financial crises. These policies have resulted in historically low levels of volatility and interest rates across many of the financial markets in which we operate. The global credit markets also faced structural issues such as increased bank capital requirements under Basel III. Consequently, these factors contributed to lower trading volumes in our rates and credit asset classes across most geographies in which we operated.

On June 23, 2016, the U.K. held a referendum regarding continued membership in the European Union (the “EU”). The exit from the EU is commonly referred to as the “Brexit.” The Brexit vote passed by 51.9% to 48.1%. The referendum was non-binding. However, the Prime Minister of the U.K. had previously announced that negotiations would commence under Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty in March 2017. Negotiations have now started in earnest following the parliamentary elections held on June 8, 2017. These negotiations under Article 50 are to determine the future terms of the U.K.’s relationship with the EU, including the terms of trade, also known as “passporting rights” between the U.K. and the EU. The effects of the Brexit will depend on any agreements the U.K. makes to retain access to EU markets – including for financial services – either during a transitional period or more permanently.

The results of the Brexit referendum contributed to short-term volatility in most of the global financial markets in which we broker, and also led to currency exchange rate fluctuations that resulted in significant weakening of the British pound against most major foreign currencies. Although we generate a significant amount of revenue in the U.K., most of it is denominated in other currencies. However, a majority of our U.K. expenses are denominated in pounds. As a result, we expect the decrease in the value of the pound to have a minimal effect on our consolidated earnings.

Since the negotiations for completing Brexit could take two years or more, we anticipate higher than average global financial market volatility to occur periodically for the foreseeable future, all else equal. Historically, elevated volatility has often led to increased volumes in the Financial Services markets in which we broker, which could be beneficial for our business. However, the outcome of any negotiations between the U.K. and the EU could prove disruptive for our Financial Services business and/or its customers for a period of time.

Regulators in the U.S. have finalized most of the new rules across a range of financial marketplaces, including OTC derivatives, as mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”). Many of these rules became effective in prior years, while ongoing phase-ins are anticipated over coming years. We believe that the November 2016 election results in the U.S. make it possible that some of the Dodd-Frank rules may be modified or repealed, which could be a net positive for our Financial Services business and its largest customers. Along these lines, the U.S. Treasury, in a report released in June, called for streamlining of rules and easing regulatory burdens on banks. However, there can be no assurance that these rules will be amended,

and we continue to expect the industry to be more heavily regulated than it was prior to the financial crisis of 2008/2009, and we are prepared to operate under a variety of regulatory regimes.

In addition to regulations in the U.S., legislators and regulators in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region have crafted similar rules, some of which have already been implemented, while the vast majority are expected to be implemented in the future. For example, on September 29, 2017, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) issued its final draft Regulatory Technical Standard (RTS) implementing the trading obligation for derivatives under the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR). ESMA’s draft RTS provides the implementing details for on-venue trading of interest rate swaps and credit default swaps. This RTS is part of a larger set of more sweeping market regulatory reforms in the E.U. known as MiFID II (Markets in Financial Instruments Directive), and are set to go live at the start of 2018.

These OTC-related regulations and proposed rules call for, among other actions, additional pre- and post-trade market transparency, heightened collateral and capital standards, the transacting of certain derivatives using authorized venues, central clearing of most standardized derivatives, specific business conduct standards and the delivery of transaction data to newly designated trade repositories for public dissemination. The various markets in which we operate have at times been, and in the future may temporarily be disrupted as these rules are implemented.

BGC Derivative Markets and GFI Swaps Exchange, our subsidiaries, began operating as Swap Execution Facilities (“SEFs”) on October 2, 2013. Both BGC Derivative Markets and GFI Swaps Exchange received permanent registration approval from the Commodity Future Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) as SEFs on January 22, 2016. Mandatory Dodd-Frank Act compliant execution on SEFs by eligible U.S. persons commenced in February 2014 for “made available to trade” products, and a wide range of other rules relating to the execution and clearing of derivative products were finalized with implementation periods in 2016 and beyond. We also own ELX, which became a dormant contract market on July 1, 2017. ELX intends on taking the necessary steps to reinstate its trading permissions. As these rules require authorized execution facilities to maintain robust front-end and back-office IT capabilities and to make large and ongoing technology investments, and because these execution facilities may be supported by a variety of voice and auction-based execution methodologies, we expect our hybrid and fully electronic trading capability to perform strongly in such an environment.

In recent years, there has been significant consolidation among the interdealer-brokers and wholesale brokers with which we compete. In addition to our 2015 acquisition of GFI, Tullett Prebon plc (“Tullett”) and ICAP plc (“ICAP”) announced in November 2015 an agreement whereby Tullett would purchase the vast majority of ICAP’s global hybrid/voice broking, as well as portions of its information businesses. Following the completion of their proposed deal in December of 2016, ICAP changed its corporate name to “NEX Group plc” (“NEX”), while Tullett changed its name to “TP ICAP plc.” We expect to continue to compete with the remaining electronic markets, post-trade and information businesses of NEX through the various offerings on our FENICS platform. We will also continue to compete with TP ICAP across various voice/hybrid brokerage marketplaces. There has also been significant consolidation among smaller non-public wholesale brokers, including our acquisitions of R.P. Martin, Heat Energy Group, Remate Lince and Sunrise Brokers Group. We view the recent consolidation in the industry favorably, as we expect it to provide additional operating leverage to our Financial Services businesses in the future.

As a wholesale intermediary, our business is driven primarily by overall industry volumes in the markets in which we broker, the size and productivity of our front-office headcount (including brokers, salespeople, managers and other front-office personnel), regulatory issues, and the percentage of our revenues we are able to generate by fully electronic means.

Below is a brief analysis of the market and industry volumes for some of our financial services products including our overall hybrid and fully electronic trading activities.

Volume is driven by a number of items, including the level of issuance for financial instruments, the price volatility of financial instruments, macro-economic conditions, the creation and adoption of new products, the regulatory environment, and the introduction and adoption of new trading technologies. Historically, increased price volatility has typically increased the demand for hedging instruments, including many of the cash and derivative products that we broker.

Rates volumes in particular are influenced by market volumes and volatility. Historically low and negative interest rates across the globe have significantly reduced the overall trading appetite for rates products. The ECB and Bank of Japan are among a number of central banks that have set key interest rates to near or below zero, while many sovereign bonds continue to trade at negative yields. The U.K.’s referendum vote to exit the European Union drove historically low yields even lower in 2016 compared with the two prior years, as a subsequent flight to high quality and deeply liquid asset classes ensued. Although the election results in the U.S. resulted in

yields rising above long-term lows during the fourth quarter of 2016 in many major markets, rates volumes were tempered industry-wide by this continuing period of exceptionally low interest rates for the full year 2016 and the first 9 months of 2017. These historically low yields have driven many traditional investor classes to other investible asset classes in search of higher yields.

Also weighing on yields and rates volumes are global central bank quantitative easing programs. The programs depress rates volumes because they entail the central banks buying government securities or other securities in the open market — particularly longer-dated instruments — in an effort to promote increased lending and liquidity and bring down long-term interest rates. When central banks hold these instruments, they tend not to trade or hedge, thus lowering rates volumes across cash and derivatives markets industry-wide. Despite the conclusion of its quantitative easing program in the fourth quarter of 2014, the U.S. Federal Reserve still had approximately $3.5 trillion worth of long-dated U.S. Treasury and Federal Agency securities as of September 27, 2017, compared with $1.7 trillion at the beginning of 2011 and zero prior to September 2008. Additionally, the U.S. Federal Reserve has continued to roll over its existing positions and has thus kept its balance sheet at elevated levels since the fourth quarter of 2014. However, the Fed published a plan to unwind its balance sheet at its meeting in June 2017. According to the Federal Open Market Committee statement dated September 20, 2017, the Federal Reserve will reduce the size of its balance sheet (or “unwind”) over time. As part of this plan, the Federal Reserve will not reinvest some of the proceeds from securities as they mature.

Other major central banks have also greatly increased the amount of longer-dated debt on their balance sheets over the past few years and have indicated that they may continue to do so until economic conditions allow for a tapering or an unwinding of their quantitative easing programs. As of the filing of this document, no other major central banks have publicly disclosed plans to taper or unwind their programs, although the ECB has discussed dropping its pledge to boost its bond purchase program, if necessary. Economists from J.P. Morgan estimate that even with the Fed unwind, the overall dollar value of balance sheets of the G-4 (the U.S., Eurozone, Japan, and U.K.) might continue to rise as a percentage of G-4 GDP over the near term. According to Bloomberg, from December 31, 2006 through September 30, 2017, this amount has increased from 10.3% of G-4 GDP to an all-time high of 37.1%. The latter figure also represented an increase of approximately 330 basis points year-on-year and 10 basis points quarter-on-quarter, even with the Fed unwind having begun.

Additional factors have weighed down market volumes in the products we broker. For example, the G-20 central banks have agreed to implement the Basel III accord. Basel III was drafted with the intention of making banks more stable in the wake of the financial crisis. The accord, which will continue to be phased in over the coming years, will force most large banks in G-20 nations to hold approximately three times as much Tier 1 capital as is required under the previous set of rules. These capital rules make it more expensive for banks to hold non-sovereign debt assets on their balance sheets, and as a result, analysts say that banks have reduced or will reduce their trading activity in corporate and asset-backed fixed income securities as well as in various other OTC cash and derivative instruments. We believe that this has further reduced overall industry volumes in many of the products we broker, particularly in credit.

On September 1, 2016, the U.S. and Japan implemented “Phase I” of the Basel Committee’s edict for initial margin and variation margins to be exchanged bilaterally between participants transacting in non-centrally cleared derivatives. “Phase I” adversely impacted trading activity at our large sell-side institutional clients during the third quarter of 2016 as they worked through arranging documentation to support the exchange of margins with each other. Some clients remain unable to deal with major counterparties. In addition, uncertainty around compliance globally has affected derivatives pricing. Although regulators in Europe, Hong Kong, Singapore and Australia previously announced delays to the “Phase I” implementation date, most uncleared bilateral rates, FX and credit derivatives trading with U.S. counterparties has necessarily included initial margin, resulting in a general widening of bid-offer spreads with subsequent reduced turnover. While there has been some substitution with trades in nearly similar products being submitted for central clearing so as to be out of scope for the new rule, these transactions did not replace the withdrawn volumes. The first tranche of this rule application in the EU occurred in the middle of the first quarter of 2017, and similar disruption may occur when similar rules are effective in the EU and in other jurisdictions as the aftermath may be spread across a wider set of participants. “Phases II and III,” which cover midsize and smaller institutions, are expected to be implemented over the next four years.

During the three months ended September 30, 2017, industry volumes were generally slightly higher year-over-year for the equity-related products we broker, but generally mixed across fixed income, currencies, and commodities (“FICC”). For example, according to Trax, the reporting platform owned by MarketAxess, third quarter of 2017 volumes for European fixed income, which includes government, agency, and corporate bonds, were 11.5% below the same period last year. Below is an expanded discussion of the volume and growth drivers of our various financial services brokerage product categories.

Our rates business is influenced by a number of factors, including global sovereign issuances, secondary trading and the hedging of these sovereign debt instruments. The amount of global sovereign debt outstanding remains high by historical standards, and the level of secondary trading and related hedging activity was generally up year-on-year for the third quarter of 2017. According to Bloomberg and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the average daily volume of various U.S. Treasuries, excluding Treasury

bills, among primary dealers was down 6% in the third quarter as compared with a year earlier. U.S. Treasury volumes traded on BrokerTec were down 3% over the same timeframe. Additionally, notional OTC interest rate derivative volumes were up by approximately 9% according to the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) over the same timeframe. Quarterly exchange-traded interest rate derivative volumes were up by 12% year-on-year at Eurex, 9% for the CME Group Inc. (“CME”), and up 36% for ICE, all according to company press releases. In comparison, our overall rates revenues were $123.0 million, up approximately 9.5% as compared to a year earlier.

Our rates revenues, like the revenues for most of our Financial Services products, are not totally dependent on market volumes and therefore do not always fluctuate consistently with industry metrics. This is largely because our voice, hybrid, and fully electronic desks in rates often have volume discounts built into their price structure, which results in our rates revenues being less volatile than the overall industry volumes.

Overall, analysts and economists expect the absolute level of sovereign debt outstanding to remain at elevated levels for the foreseeable future as governments finance their future deficits and roll over their sizable existing debt. For example, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (the “OECD”), which includes almost all of the advanced and developed economies of the world, reported that general government debt (defined as general government net financial liabilities) as a percentage of nominal GDP is estimated to be 70% for the entire OECD in 2018. This would represent a slight increase from 69% in 2016, but up considerably from the 38% figure in 2007. Meanwhile, economists expect that the effects of various forms of quantitative easing undertaken by the various major central banks will continue to negatively impact financial markets volumes, as economic growth remains weak in most OECD countries. As a result, we expect long-term tailwinds in our rates business from continuing high levels of government debt, but continued near-term headwinds due to the current low interest rate environment and continued accommodative monetary policies globally.

Global FX volumes were generally higher during the third quarter of 2017 year-over-year, likely due to market anticipation of the Fed unwinding quantitative easing coupled with the EU signaling that it is exploring a reduction in similar bond purchases as the Eurozone economy improves. Thus, overall FX volumes at Thomson Reuters were up 9% during the quarter, overall FX volumes were up 18% for NEX, while average daily FX futures volumes at CME were up 26%, all when compared with the prior year period. In comparison, our overall FX revenues increased by 14.6% to $83.9 million.

The cash portion of our credit business is impacted by the level of global corporate bond issuance, while both the cash and credit derivatives sides of this business are impacted by sovereign and corporate issuance. The global credit derivative market turnover has declined over the last few years due to the introduction of rules and regulations around the clearing of credit derivatives in the U.S. and elsewhere, along with non-uniform regulation across different geographies. In addition, many of our large bank customers continue to reduce their inventory of bonds and other credit products in order to comply with Basel III and other international financial regulations. During the third quarter, primary dealer average daily volume for corporate bonds, excluding commercial paper, was up by 6% according to Bloomberg and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Also, during the quarter, the notional amount of credit derivatives traded and the number of credit derivatives transactions were up by 14% and down by 6%, respectively, from a year earlier as reported by the ISDA. In comparison, our overall credit revenues were lower by 1.6% to $66.1 million.

Energy and commodities volumes were generally mixed during the third quarter of 2017 compared with a year earlier. For example, according to the Futures Industry Association, the number of global futures contracts in agriculture, energy, non-precious metals, and metals were down by 32%, up 10%, up 23%, and down 3%, respectively, year-over-year in the third quarter of 2017. For the same timeframe and same products, global listed options contracts were up 14%, down 3%, up 36%, and up 45%, respectively. In comparison, BGC’s energy and commodities revenues were up 2.5% to $48.2 million.

Global equity volumes were generally down during the third quarter of 2017 compared with a year earlier. According to Goldman Sachs Research, the average daily volumes of U.S. and European shares were down 8% (measured in number of shares) and up 4% (in notional terms), respectively year-on-year. Additionally, average daily volumes of U.S. equity options were down by approximately 6% for ICE. Over the same timeframe, European equity indices derivatives average daily volumes declined by 17% for ICE and were down by 13% at Eurex. Our overall revenues from equities, insurance, and other asset classes more than doubled to $79.7 million, led by the additions of Sunrise Brokers and Besso.

Historically, technology-based product growth has led to higher margins and greater profits over time for exchanges and wholesale financial intermediaries alike, even if overall company revenues remain consistent. This is largely because fewer employees are needed to process the same volume of trades as trading becomes more automated. Over time, the conversion of exchange-traded and OTC markets to electronic trading has also led, on average, to volumes increasing by enough to offset commissions declines, and thus often to similar or higher overall revenues. We have been a pioneer in creating and encouraging hybrid and fully electronic trading, and we continually work with our customers to expand such trading across more asset classes and geographies.

Outside of U.S. Treasuries and spot FX, the banks and broker-dealers that dominate the OTC markets had, until recent years, generally been hesitant in adopting electronically traded products. However, the banks, broker-dealers, and professional trading firms are now much more active in hybrid and fully electronically traded markets across various OTC products, including credit derivative indices, FX derivatives, non-U.S. sovereign bonds, corporate bonds, and interest rate derivatives. These electronic markets have grown as percentage of overall industry volumes for the past few years as firms like BGC have invested in the kinds of technology favored by our customers. Recently enacted and pending regulation in Asia, Europe and the U.S. regarding banking, capital markets, and OTC derivatives has accelerated the adoption of fully electronic trading, and we expect to benefit from the rules and regulations surrounding OTC derivatives. Our understanding is that the rules that have been adopted or are being finalized will continue to allow for trading through a variety of means, including voice, and we believe the net impact of these rules and additional bank capital requirements will encourage the growth of fully electronic trading for a number of products we broker. We also believe that new clients, beyond our large bank customer base, will primarily transact electronically across our FENICS platform.

The combination of more market acceptance of hybrid and fully electronic trading and our competitive advantage in terms of technology and experience has contributed to our strong gains in electronically traded products. We continue to invest in hybrid and fully electronic technology broadly across our financial services product categories. FENICS has exhibited strong growth over the past several years, and we believe that this growth has outpaced the financial technology and wholesale brokerage industry as a whole. We expect this trend to continue as we convert more of our voice and hybrid brokerage into fully electronic brokerage across our FENICS platform.

FENICS net revenues increased by 9.4% to $53.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017, as compared with $48.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The increase in overall FENICS net revenues for the period was primarily driven by strong growth from fully electronic rates. We offer electronically traded products on a significant portion of our Financial Services segment’s hundreds of brokerage desks. The annualized revenues and profits of these products have been significantly higher than those of eSpeed and Trayport combined. eSpeed was sold to Nasdaq in the second quarter of 2013 for over $1.2 billion, and Trayport was sold to ICE in the fourth quarter of 2015 for $650 million, which was adjusted at closing. We expect the proportion of desks offering electronically traded products to continue to increase as we invest in technology to drive electronic trading over our platform. Over time, we expect the growth of FENICS to further improve this segment’s profitability and market share.

Our discussion of financial results for Newmark or “Real Estate Services” reflects only those businesses owned by us and does not include the results for Knight Frank or for the independently owned offices that use some variation of the Newmark name in their branding or marketing.

Our Real Estate Services segment continued to show strong growth and generated approximately 48.3% of our consolidated revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2017. Real Estate brokerage revenues were $256.9 million, up 11.6% year-over-year, which included revenue growth of 14.0% and 7.9% from leasing and other services and real estate capital markets brokerage, respectively. Our Real Estate management services were up by 23.1%, servicing fees increased by 29.1%, and overall Newmark revenues improved by 6.8%. As we continue to invest in our business, we expect our Real Estate Services growth to outpace the industry over time.

We continued to invest in the Real Estate Services segment by adding dozens of high profile and talented brokers and other revenue-generating professionals. Historically, newly hired commercial real estate brokers tend to achieve dramatically higher productivity in their second and third years with the Company, although we incur related expenses immediately. As our newly-hired brokers increase their production, we expect Newmark’s revenue and earnings growth to improve, thus demonstrating our operating leverage.

Newmark offers a diverse array of integrated services and products designed to meet the full needs of both real estate investors/owners and occupiers. Our technology advantages, industry-leading talent, deep and diverse client relationships and suite of complementary services and products allow us to actively cross-sell our services and drive industry-leading margins.

We offer innovative real estate technology solutions for both investors/owners and occupiers that enable our clients to increase efficiency and realize additional profits. Our differentiated, value-added and client-facing technology platforms have been utilized by clients that occupy over 3.5 billion square feet of commercial real estate space globally. For real estate investors and owners, our N360 platform is a powerful tool that provides instant access and comprehensive commercial real estate data in one place via mobile or desktop. This technology platform makes information, such as listings, historical leasing, tenant/owner information, investment sales, procurement, research, and debt on commercial real estate properties, accessible to investors and owners. N360 also integrates a Geographic Information Systems (which we refer to as “GIS”) platform with 3D mapping powered by Newmark’s Real Estate Data Warehouse. For our occupier clients, the Newmark VISION platform provides integrated business intelligence, reporting and analytics. Our clients use VISION to reduce cost, improve speed and supplement decision making in applications such as real estate transactions and asset administration, project management, building operations and facilities management, environmental and energy management, and workplace management. Our deep and growing real estate database and commitment to providing innovative technological solutions empower us to provide our clients with value-adding technology products and data-driven advice and analytics.

We offer a broad range of real estate capital markets services, including investment sales and facilitating access to providers of capital. We provide access to a wide range of services, including asset sales, sale leasebacks, mortgage and entity-level financing, equity-raising, underwriting and due diligence. Through our mortgage bankers and brokers, we are able to offer multiple debt and equity alternatives to fund capital markets transactions through third party banks, insurance companies and other capital providers, as well as through our government sponsored entity lending platform, Berkeley Point. Although preliminary figures suggest U.S. commercial real estate sales volumes across the industry declined 7% year-over-year in the first nine months of 2017 according to Real Capital Analytics (which we refer to as “RCA”), our capital markets revenues increased by 15% year-over-year in the first nine months of 2017. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we completed approximately $32 billion in capital market transactions, representing an increase of approximately 36% year-over-year. This $32 billion in transactions includes approximately $9 billion in financing and note sales.

We execute marketing and leasing programs on behalf of owners of real estate to secure tenants and negotiate leases. We understand the value of a creditworthy tenant to landlords and work to maximize the financing value of any leasing opportunity. As of September 30, 2017, we represent buildings that total approximately 350 million square feet of commercial real estate on behalf of owners in the U.S.

We operate a national valuation and advisory business, which has grown expansively in 2017 by approximately 160 professionals. Our appraisal team executes projects of nearly every size and type, from single properties to large portfolios, existing and proposed facilities and mixed-use developments across the spectrum of asset values. Clients include banks, pension funds, insurance companies, developers, corporations, equity funds, REITs and institutional capital sources. These institutions utilize the advisory services we provide in their loan underwriting, construction financing, portfolio analytics, feasibility determination, acquisition structures, litigation support and financial reporting.

We provide property management services on a contractual basis to owners and investors in office, industrial and retail properties. Property management services include building operations and maintenance, vendor and contract negotiation, project oversight and value engineering, labor relations, property inspection/quality control, property accounting and financial reporting, cash flow analysis, financial modeling, lease administration, due diligence and exit strategies. We have an opportunity to grow our property or facilities management contracts in connection with other high margin leasing or other contracts. These businesses also give us better insight into our clients’ overall real estate needs.

Through Berkeley Point, we are one of 25 approved lenders that participate in Fannie Mae’s Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (“DUS”) program and one of 22 lenders approved as a Freddie Mac seller/servicer. For the first nine months of 2017, Berkeley Point’s loan originations increased by 33% year-on-year to $7.4 billion. As a low-risk intermediary, Berkeley Point originates loans guaranteed by government agencies or entities and pre-sells such loans prior to transaction closing.

In conjunction with our origination services, we sell the loans that we originate under GSE programs and retain the servicing of those loans. The servicing portfolio provides a stable, predictable recurring stream of revenue to us over the life of each loan. As of September 30, 2017, Berkeley Point’s servicing portfolio was $58.4 billion and average remaining servicing term per loan was approximately eight years. The combination of Berkeley Point and ARA brings together, respectively, a leading multifamily debt origination platform with a top-three multifamily investment sales business, which we believe will provide substantial cross-selling opportunities. In particular, we expect revenues to increase as Berkeley Point begins to capture a greater portion of the financings on ARA’s investment sales transactions.

We provide commercial real estate due diligence consulting and advisory services to a variety of clients, including lenders, investment banks and investors. Our core competencies include underwriting, modeling, structuring, due diligence and asset management. We also offer clients cost-effective and flexible staffing solutions through both on-site and off-site teams. We believe that this business line gives us another way to cross-sell services to our clients.

We represent commercial tenants in all aspects of the leasing process, including space acquisition and disposition, strategic planning, site selection, financial and market analysis, economic incentives analysis, lease negotiations, lease auditing and project management. We use innovative technology and data to provide tenants with an advantage in negotiating leases, which has contributed to our market share gains.

We provide services to help organizations understand their current workplace standards and develop plans and policies to optimize their real estate footprint. We offer a multifaceted consulting service underpinned by robust data and technology.

GCS is our consulting and services business that focuses on reducing occupancy expense and improving efficiency for corporate real estate occupiers, with large, often multi-national presence. We provide beginning-to-end corporate real estate solutions for clients. GCS makes its clients more profitable by optimizing real estate usage, reducing overall corporate footprint, and improving work flow and human capital efficiency through large scale data analysis and our industry-leading technology. We offer global enterprise optimization, asset strategy, transaction services, information management, an operational technology product and transactional and operational consulting. Our consultants provide expertise in financial integration, portfolio strategy, location strategy and optimization, workplace strategies, workflow and business process improvement, merger and acquisition integration, and industrial consulting.

We provide a variety of services to tenants and owners of self-occupied spaces. These include conversion management, move management, construction management and strategic occupancy planning services.

We manage leases for our clients for a fee. We also perform lease audits and certain accounting functions related to the leases. For large occupier clients, our real estate technology enables them to access and manage their complete portfolio of real estate assets. We offer clients a fully integrated user-focused technology product designed to help them efficiently manage their real estate costs and assets.

We manage a broad range of properties on behalf of users of commercial real estate, including headquarters, facilities and office space, for a broad cross section of companies, including Fortune 500 and Forbes Global 2000 companies. We manage the day-to-day operations and maintenance for urban and suburban commercial properties of most types, including office, industrial, data centers, healthcare, retail, call centers, urban towers, suburban campuses, and landmark buildings. Facilities management services may also include facility audits and reviews, energy management services, janitorial services, mechanical services, bill payment, maintenance, project management, and moving management.

The key drivers of revenue growth for U.S. commercial real estate services companies include the overall health of the U.S. economy, including gross domestic product and employment trends in the U.S., which drives demand for various types of commercial leases, financing, and purchases, the institutional ownership of commercial real estate as an investible asset class; and the ability to attract and retain talent to our real estate services platform. In addition, in real estate sales, also known as real estate capital markets, growth is driven by the availability of credit to purchasers of and investors in commercial real estate.

Berkeley Point’s origination business is impacted by the lending caps imposed by the FHFA. As of September 30, 2017, the industry wide caps are set at $73 billion, excluding loans exempt from the caps, such as loans in the affordable and underserved market segments, or that finance water and energy efficiency improvements.

The U.S. economy expanded by a seasonally adjusted annualized rate of 3.0% during the third quarter of 2017, according to preliminary figures from the U.S. Department of Commerce. This growth compares with an increase of 3.5% during the third quarter of 2016. The consensus is for U.S. GDP to expand by 2.2% and 2.1% in 2017 and 2018, respectively, according to a recent Bloomberg survey of economists. We expect that this moderate pace of growth should help keep interest rates and inflation low by historical standards. The Federal Reserve expects inflation to remain stable at around its desired target of 2.0% over through the end of 2018. Moderate economic growth combined with low and steady inflation gives the Federal Reserve the practical ability to raise the short-term federal funds rate from the low levels of the post-recession years. Officials raised rates by a quarter point in June for the second time this year and have indicated one more increase this year, followed by three increases in 2018. Officials expect rates to settle at the equilibrium level of 2.9% by the end of 2019, a level below prior business cycles and below the Federal Reserve’s projections from just a few years ago.

Employers added a monthly average of 91,333 new jobs in the third quarter, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics report lower than last year’s monthly average of 238,667 and above the 80,000 jobs necessary to absorb new graduates and other first-time entrants to the labor force. During the quarter, office-using jobs (for example, finance, information, and professional and business services) increased by a monthly average of 18,000. Over the past 12 months, the number of office jobs rose by 1.9%, above the overall employment growth rate of 1.2%. The solid level of hiring has helped absorb some of the long-term unemployed sidelined by the recession – called “slack” by economists. The U-6 rate, which includes labor market slack not picked up in the unemployment rate, was 8.3% in September its lowest level since before the most recent recession began in December 2007.

The 10-year Treasury yield ended the third quarter at 2.33%, up 73 basis points from the year-earlier figure of 1.60%. However, 10-year Treasury yields have remained well below their historical average of approximately 6.50%, in large part due to market expectations that the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) will only moderately raise the federal funds rate over the next few years. Interest rates are also low due to even lower or negative benchmark government interest rates in much of the rest of the developed world, which makes U.S. government bonds relatively more attractive.

The combination of moderate economic growth and low interest rates prevailing since the recession has been a powerful stimulus for commercial real estate, delivering steady absorption of space and strong investor demand for the yields available through

both direct ownership of assets and publicly traded funds. Construction activity has been slow to ramp up, with the exception of apartments, and has generally remained in line with demand despite temporary overbuilding in isolated locations. Vacancy rates are at or near their cyclical lows, but are trending in different directions. Apartment vacancies are edging higher due to elevated deliveries of new product in some areas; office vacancies are broadly level; industrial vacancies continue to move lower thanks to voracious demand for e-commerce facilities; and retail vacancies are trending lower due to very low construction levels, even as retailers struggle with the migration of sales online. Asking rental rates posted moderate gains across most property types during the third quarter, fueled by sustained demand for space, tight vacancies and the delivery of new product with top-of-market asking rents.

The following key trends drove the commercial real estate market during the first nine months of 2017:

Although overall industry metrics are not necessarily as correlated to our revenues, they do provide some indication of the industry taken as a whole. The U.S. commercial property market continues to display strength, despite slowing growth of commercial property prices, as per CoStar. U.S. commercial real estate activity and prices were impacted during the first nine months of the year primarily related to limited properties available for sale as well as moderating volume in major metros. However, spreads of U.S. commercial real estate capitalization rates over 10-year U.S. Treasuries were 369 basis points on average during the third quarter of 2017, well above the pre-recession low of 126 basis points and slightly below the trailing 10-year average spread of 364 basis points. If the U.S. economy continues to expand at the moderate pace envisioned by many economists, we would expect this to fuel the continued demand for commercial real estate. The spread between local 10-year benchmark government bonds and U.S. cap rates was even wider with respect to major countries including Japan, Canada, Germany, Italy, the U.K. and France during the quarter. This should continue to make U.S. commercial real estate a relatively attractive investment for non-U.S. investors.

During the first nine months of 2017, the dollar volume of U.S. commercial real estate sales totaled approximately $331.4 billion in the U.S., down by 7% from the same period in 2016 according to RCA. In comparison, our real estate capital markets businesses, which includes investment sales and commercial mortgage brokerage, increased its revenues by 15% period-over-period for the first nine months of 2017, primarily due to organic growth.

According to Newmark Research, the combined average vacancy rate for office, industrial, and retail properties ended the third quarter of 2017 at 8.3%, versus 8.2% a year earlier. Rents for virtually all property types in the U.S. continued to improve modestly. However, Newmark Research estimates that overall U.S. leasing activity during the year was flat to down slightly from the year ago period.

In comparison, revenues from our leasing and other services business increased by 17% in the first nine months of 2016 to $430.9 million.

See “Regulation” in Part I, Item 1 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for information related to our regulatory environment.

See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” herein for information related to our liquidity and capital resources.

Key drivers of our revenue are front-office producer headcount and average revenue per producer. We believe that our strong technology platform and unique partnership structure have enabled us to use both acquisitions and recruiting to profitably increase our front-office staff at a faster rate than our largest competitors.

We have invested significantly to capitalize on the current business environment through acquisitions, technology spending and the hiring of new brokers, salespeople, managers and other front-office personnel. The business climate for these acquisitions has been competitive, and it is expected that these conditions will persist for the foreseeable future. We have been able to attract businesses and brokers, salespeople, managers and other front-office personnel to our platform as we believe they recognize that we have the scale, technology, experience and expertise to succeed in the current business environment.

As of September 30, 2017, our front-office headcount was up 5.0% year-over-year at over 4,000 brokers, salespeople, managers and other front-office personnel. For the quarter ended September 30, 2017, average revenue generated per front-office employee increased by 6.0% from a year ago to approximately $178 thousand. By segment, front office headcount increased by approximately 6.9% for the third quarter of 2017 compared with a year earlier in Financial Services, while revenue per front office employee increased by 10.7%. For Real Estate Services, front office headcount increased by approximately 2.1% for the third quarter of 2017 compared with a year earlier, while revenue per front office employee was unchanged. Our average revenue per front-office employee has historically grown more slowly, or declined, year-over-year for periods following significant headcount increases. The additional brokers and salespeople generally achieve significantly higher productivity levels in their second or third year with the Company.

The Real Estate Services productivity figures are based on segment revenues from leasing and capital markets brokers and originators in GSE lending business, and exclude appraisers and both revenues and staff in management services and “other.” The Financial Services calculations include segment revenues from brokerage, data, software and post-trade. The average revenues for all producers are approximate and based on the total revenues divided by the weighted-average number of salespeople and brokers for the period.

Our largest Financial Services customers have indicated that they are likely to increase the adoption of both hybrid and fully electronic trading. We believe this will favor the larger inter-dealer brokers over smaller, non-public local competitors, as the smaller players generally do not have the financial resources to invest the necessary amounts in technology. We believe this will lead to further consolidation across the wholesale financial brokerage industry, and thus allow us to profitably grow our front-office headcount and broker productivity.

Since early 2016, our Financial Services acquisitions have included Lucera, Sunrise Brokers, Besso, and several smaller acquisitions.

On November 4, 2016, the Company acquired the 80% of the Lucera business (also known as “LFI Holdings, LLC” or “LFI”) not already owned by the Company. Lucera, a technology infrastructure provider tailored to the financial sector, is a limited liability company headquartered in New York.

On December 15, 2016, we completed the acquisition of the businesses of Sunrise Brokers, an independent financial brokerage specializing in worldwide equity derivatives. Based in London, and with offices in New York and Hong Kong, Sunrise Brokers was voted overall “Number One Equity Products Broker of the Year” by Risk Magazine for the past nine years, and the top broker in “Equity Exotic Derivatives” for 13 years running. Sunrise Brokers has approximately 135 brokers, generated approximately $90 million in revenues in 2015, and has grown its revenues and profits for each of the previous three years.

On February 28, 2017, we completed the acquisition of Besso, an independent Lloyd’s of London insurance broker with a strong reputation across Property, Casualty, Marine, Aviation, Professional and Financial Risks and Reinsurance. Besso generated revenue of approximately £44 million in the financial year ended December 31, 2016.

Since early 2016, our Real Estate Services business has completed several smaller acquisitions.

Berkeley Point was acquired by a controlled affiliate of Cantor on April 10, 2014 and was sold by this affiliate to BGC on September 8, 2017.

For the three months ended September 30, 2017, we had income from operations before income taxes of $142.4 million compared to $144.6 million in the year earlier period. Total revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2017 increased approximately $92.2 million to $827.0 million led by Newmark and our Rates and Foreign Exchange businesses. Our more than 12% year-on-year top line improvement was also driven by solid growth from fully electronic brokerage revenue from our FENICS platform. Revenues from Equities, insurance, and other asset classes more than doubled, due mainly to the additions of Sunrise and Besso, both of which are performing well. Total expenses increased approximately $85.2 million to $775.0 million, due to a $55.8 million increase in compensation expenses, a $39.8 million increase in non-compensation expenses, partially offset by a $10.4 million decrease in allocations of net income and grant of exchangeability to limited partnership units and founding/working partner units (“FPUs”). Our expenses reflect the impact of higher revenues on variable compensation, recent acquisitions, and new hires. We expect our revenues and earnings to grow over time as we continue to invest our $700.7 million of liquidity and continue to reap the benefits from our recent acquisitions and front-office hires. As we continue to invest in the Company, we expect our revenues and earnings to strongly outperform our competitors over time.

Our Real Estate Services segment generated strong year-on-year growth in leasing, capital markets, and management and servicing fees. Newmark’s overall revenues for the quarter were up 7% to $399 million, while our top-line revenues increased by 18% to $1,139 million for the first nine months of 2017, both when compared with the year-earlier periods. We believe that the addition of Berkeley Point will significantly increase the scale and scope of our Real Estate Services business, and that the combination of mortgage broking, multifamily investment sales, and agency multifamily lending will over time generate substantial revenue synergies. As we continue to invest in our business, we expect our Real Estate Services growth to outpace the industry over time.

We anticipate receiving over time, more than $720 million of additional Nasdaq shares (based on the October 25, 2017 closing price), which are not reflected on our balance sheet. We also expect our earnings to continue to grow as we continue to add revenues from our highly profitable fully electronic products, and benefit from the strength of our Real Estate Services business. On October 25, 2017 our Board declared an 18 cent dividend for the third quarter, which is up 12.5% year-on-year. We anticipate having substantial resources with which to pay dividends, repurchase shares and/or units, profitably hire, and make accretive acquisitions, all while maintaining or improving our investment grade rating.

The following table sets forth our consolidated statements of operations data, which has been recast to include the financial results of Berkeley Point, expressed as a percentage of total revenues for the periods indicated (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,										Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017					2016					2017					2016
	Actual Results		Percentage of Total Revenues			Actual Results		Percentage of Total Revenues			Actual Results		Percentage of Total Revenues			Actual Results		Percentage of Total Revenues
Revenues:
Commissions	$	582,106		70.4	%	$	492,808		67.1	%	$	1,704,998		69.3	%	$	1,465,293		68.1	%
Principal transactions		75,766		9.1			76,332		10.4			241,869		9.9			255,219		11.8
Total brokerage revenues		657,872		79.5			569,140		77.5			1,946,867		79.2			1,720,512		79.9
Gains from mortgage banking activities, net		45,455		5.5			65,377		8.9			164,263		6.7			139,009		6.5
Real estate management and other services		60,798		7.4			49,373		6.7			163,017		6.6			140,960		6.6
Servicing fees		29,057		3.5			22,502		3.1			80,729		3.3			62,199		2.9
Fees from related parties		7,173		0.9			6,354		0.9			20,129		0.8			19,086		0.9
Data, software and post-trade		13,776		1.7			13,266		1.8			40,185		1.6			41,360		1.9
Interest income		11,726		1.4			8,012		1.1			40,909		1.7			24,332		1.1
Other revenues		1,171		0.1			796	—				3,023		0.1			4,880		0.2
Total revenues		827,028		100.0			734,820		100.0			2,459,122		100.0			2,152,338		100.0
Expenses:
Compensation and employee benefits		495,145		59.9			439,384		59.8			1,438,129		58.5			1,306,749		60.7
Allocations of net income and grant of exchangeability to limited partnership units and FPUs		48,446		5.8			58,771		8.0			161,876		6.6			132,670		6.2
Total compensation and employee benefits		543,591		65.7			498,155		67.8			1,600,005		65.1			1,439,419		69.9
Occupancy and equipment		51,962		6.3			49,032		6.7			153,102		6.2			153,692		7.2
Fees to related parties		4,380		0.5			5,323		0.7			16,389		0.7			15,460		0.7
Professional and consulting fees		24,486		3.0			17,624		2.4			69,047		2.8			50,032		2.3
Communications		33,290		4.0			31,562		4.3			97,816		4.0			94,857		4.4
Selling and promotion		26,828		3.2			23,139		3.1			81,503		3.3			75,613		3.5
Commissions and floor brokerage		10,410		1.3			8,645		1.2			31,316		1.3			28,010		1.3
Interest expense		24,425		3.0			18,831		2.6			69,678		2.8			53,770		2.5
Other expenses		55,600		6.7			37,428		5.1			148,262		6.0			116,075		5.4
Total expenses		774,972		93.7			689,739		93.9			2,267,118		92.2			2,026,928		94.2
Other income (losses), net:
Gain (loss) on divestiture and sale of investments		4	—				7,044		1.0			561		—			7,044		0.3
Gains (losses) on equity method investments		2,147		0.2			796		0.1			3,986		0.2			2,547		0.1
Other income (loss)		88,195		10.7			91,655		12.5			97,928		4.0			98,192		4.6
Total other income (losses), net		90,346		10.9			99,495		13.6			102,475		4.2			107,783		5.0
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes		142,402		17.2			144,576		19.7			294,479		12.0			233,193		10.8
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		31,854		3.8			30,273		4.1			55,084		2.3			45,718		2.1
Consolidated net income (loss)		110,548		13.4			114,303		15.6			239,395		9.7			187,475		8.7
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries		29,019		3.5			27,092		3.7			68,121		2.7			46,892		2.2
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	81,529		9.9	%	$	87,211		11.9	%	$	171,274		7.0	%	$	140,583		6.5	%

Total brokerage revenues increased by $88.7 million, or 15.6%, to $657.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. Commission revenues increased by $89.3 million, or 18.1%, to $582.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. Principal transactions revenues decreased by $0.6 million, or 0.7%, to $75.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016.

The increase in brokerage revenues was primarily driven by increases in revenues from Equities, insurance, and other asset classes (following the acquisitions of Sunrise Brokers and Besso), leasing and other services, real estate capital markets brokerage, and growth in our rates and foreign exchange businesses.

Our rates revenues increased by $10.7 million, or 9.5%, to $123.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The increase in rates revenues was primarily due to strong improvement in our fully electronic rates business.

Our credit revenues decreased by $1.1 million, or 1.6%, to $66.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017.

Our FX revenues increased by $10.7 million, or 14.6%, to $83.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. This increase was primarily driven by improved global volumes.

Our brokerage revenues from energy and commodities increased by $1.2 million, or 2.5%, to $48.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017.

Our brokerage revenues from equities, insurance, and other asset classes increased by $40.6 million, or 103.9%, to $79.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. This increase was primarily driven by our acquisitions of Sunrise Brokers in December 2016 and Besso in February 2017.

Leasing and other services revenues increased by $19.5 million, or 14.0%, to $158.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the prior year period, primarily due to organic growth.

Real estate capital markets revenues increased by $7.2 million, or 7.9%, to $98.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the prior year period. Growth across leasing and real estate capital markets was primarily due to organic growth as recent investments began to pay off.

Gains from mortgage banking activities, net, revenue decreased by $19.9 million, or 30.5%, to $45.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 primarily due to a decline from record loan originations in the overall government multifamily agency lending industry in the third quarter of 2016, as well as large transactions in the three months ended September 30, 2016.

Real estate management and other services revenue increased by $11.4 million, or 23.1%, to $60.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 primarily due to organic growth and acquisitions.

Servicing fees increased by $6.6 million, or 29.1%, to $29.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 primarily due to growth in Berkeley Point’s primary servicing portfolio.

Fees from related parties increased by $0.8 million, or 12.9%, to $7.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016.

Data, software and post-trade revenues increased by $0.5 million, or 3.8%, to $13.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016.

Interest income increased by $3.7 million, or 46.4%, to $11.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. This increase was primarily due to interest income on the $150.0 million Credit Facility loan with an affiliate of Cantor, dividends received, and interest income on deposits.

Other revenues increased by $0.4 million, or 47.1%, to $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016.

Compensation and employee benefits expense increased by $55.8 million, or 12.7%, to $495.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. The main driver of this increase was the increased level of brokerage revenues particularly related to the acquisitions of Sunrise Brokers Group and Besso Insurance Group Limited and growth in our Real Estate Services business.

Allocations of Net Income and Grant of Exchangeability to Limited Partnership Units and FPUs

Allocations of net income and grant of exchangeability to limited partnership units and FPUs decreased by $10.3 million, or 17.6%, to $48.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. This was primarily driven by a decrease in charges related to grants of exchangeability to limited partnership units during the three months ended September 30, 2017.

Occupancy and equipment expense increased by $2.9 million, or 6.0%, to $52.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. This increase was primarily driven by increases in rent, occupancy, and maintenance contracts.

Fees to related parties decreased by $0.9 million, or 17.7%, to $4.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. Fees to related parties are allocations paid to Cantor for administrative and support services.

Professional and consulting fees increased by $6.9 million, or 38.9%, to $24.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. This increase was primarily driven by increased legal and consulting fees.

Communications expense increased by $1.7 million, or 5.5%, to $33.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. As a percentage of total revenues, communications slightly decreased from the prior year period.

Selling and promotion expense increased by $3.7 million, or 15.9%, to $26.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. The increase was primarily due to increased advertising, marketing,

and other related expenses in our Real Estate Services segment, as well as our acquisition of Besso. As a percentage of total revenues, selling and promotion remained relatively unchanged across the two periods.

Commissions and floor brokerage expense increased by $1.8 million, or 20.4%, to $10.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. Commissions and floor brokerage tends to move in line with Financial Services brokerage revenues (excluding Insurance related revenue).

Interest expense increased by $5.6 million, or 29.7%, to $24.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. The increase was primarily driven by the interest expense on the new $575.0 million senior term loan borrowing, the new $400.0 million senior revolving credit facility, and the interest expense on the $150.0 million credit facility.

Other expenses increased by $18.2 million, or 48.6%, to $55.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016, primarily related to an impairment of intangible assets and an increase in amortization expense on acquired intangibles, amortization expense related to mortgage servicing rights, and other provisions.

We had a gain on divestiture of $4.0 thousand related to the sale of certain marketable securities in the three months ended September 30, 2017. For the three months ended September 30, 2016, there was a gain of $7.0 million related to the sale of certain cost method investments.

Gains (losses) on equity method investments increased by $1.4 million, or 169.7%, to a gain of $2.1 million, for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to a gain of $0.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016. Gains (losses) on equity method investments represent our pro rata share of the net gains or losses on investments over which we have significant influence but which we do not control.

Other income (loss) decreased by $3.5 million, or 3.8%, to $88.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. The $3.5 million decrease was primarily due to a gain of $18.3 million related to an adjustment of future earn-out payments that will no longer be required which was recognized in the third quarter of 2016, partially offset by an increase in net realized and unrealized gains related to marketable securities.

Provision (benefit) for income taxes increased by $1.6 million, or 5.2%, to $31.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. This increase was primarily driven by the change in the overall geographic mix of our earnings for the period. In general, our consolidated effective tax rate can vary from period to period depending on, among other factors, the geographic and business mix of our earnings.

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries increased by $1.9 million, or 7.1%, to $29.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016.

Total brokerage revenues increased by $226.4 million, or 13.2%, to $1,946.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Commission revenues increased by $239.7 million, or 16.4%, to $1,705.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Principal transactions revenues decreased by $13.4 million, or 5.2%, to $241.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

The increase in brokerage revenues was primarily driven by increases in revenues from Equities, insurance, and other asset classes (due to the acquisitions of Sunrise Brokers and Besso), leasing and other services, real estate capital markets brokerage, and growth in our rates and foreign exchange businesses, partially offset by lower revenues in energy & commodities and credit related products.

Our rates revenues increased by $39.6 million, or 11.2%, to $392.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase in rates revenues was primarily due to strong improvement in our fully electronic rates business.

Our credit revenues decreased by $10.7 million, or 4.7%, to $218.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. This decrease was primarily driven by lower volumes and a decrease in fully electronic credit brokerage.

Our FX revenues increased by $11.1 million, or 4.8%, to $243.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. This increase was primarily driven by improved global volumes.

Our brokerage revenues from energy and commodities decreased by $18.9 million, or 11.2%, to $149.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. This decrease was primarily driven by lower global volumes.

Our brokerage revenues from equities, insurance, and other asset classes increased by $107.7 million, or 80.9%, to $240.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. This increase was primarily driven by our acquisitions of Sunrise Brokers in December 2016 and Besso in February 2017.

Leasing and other services revenues increased by $61.6 million, or 16.7%, to $430.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the prior year period, primarily due to organic growth.

Real estate capital markets revenues increased by $36.1 million, or 15.4%, to $270.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the prior year period. Growth across leasing and real estate capital markets was primarily due to organic growth and increased front office broker productivity as recent investments began to pay off.

Gains from mortgage banking activities, net, revenue increased by $25.3 million, or 18.2%, to $164.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily due to stronger production in Berkeley Point’s multifamily agency loan originations business.

Real estate management and other services revenue increased by $22.1 million, or 15.6%, to $163.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 due to organic growth and acquisitions.

Servicing fees increased by $18.5 million, or 29.8%, to $80.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily due to growth in Berkeley Point’s primary servicing portfolio.

Fees from related parties increased by $1.0 million, or 5.5%, to $20.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Data, software and post-trade revenues decreased by $1.2 million, or 2.8%, to $40.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Interest income increased by $16.6 million, or 68.1%, to $40.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. This increase was primarily due to interest income on the $150.0 million Credit Facility loan with an affiliate of Cantor, dividends received, and interest income on deposits.

Other revenues decreased by $1.9 million, or 38.1%, to $3.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to insurance recoveries related to Hurricane Sandy recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Compensation and employee benefits expense increased by $131.4 million, or 10.1%, to $1,438.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The main driver was the compensation expense related to the increased level of brokerage revenues particularly related to the acquisitions of Sunrise Brokers Group and Besso Insurance Group Limited and growth in our Real Estate Services business.

Allocations of Net Income and Grant of Exchangeability to Limited Partnership Units and FPUs

Allocations of net income and grant of exchangeability to limited partnership units and FPUs increased by $29.2 million, or 22.0%, to $161.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. This increase was primarily driven by an increase in charges related to grants of exchangeability to limited partnership units during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

Occupancy and equipment expense decreased by $0.6 million, or 0.4%, to $153.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. This decrease was primarily driven by lower amortization expense and a decrease in fixed asset impairment charges.

Fees to related parties increased by $0.9 million, or 6.0%, to $16.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Fees to related parties are allocations paid to Cantor for administrative and support services.

Professional and consulting fees increased by $19.0 million, or 38.0%, to $69.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. This increase was primarily driven by increased legal and consulting fees.

Communications expense increased by $3.0 million, or 3.1%, to $97.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. As a percentage of total revenues, communications slightly decreased as compared to the prior year period.

Selling and promotion expense increased by $5.9 million, or 7.8%, to $81.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The increase was primarily due to increased advertising, marketing and other related expenses in our Real Estate Services segment, as well as our acquisitions of Besso and Sunrise. As a percentage of total revenues, selling and promotion remained relatively unchanged across the two periods.

Commissions and floor brokerage expense increased by $3.3 million, or 11.8%, to $31.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Commissions and floor brokerage tends to move in line with Financial Services brokerage revenues (excluding Insurance related revenue).

Interest expense increased by $15.9 million, or 29.6%, to $69.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The increase was primarily driven by the interest expense on the new $575.0 million senior term loan borrowing, the new $400.0 million senior revolving credit facility, and the interest expense on the $150.0 million credit facility.

Other expenses increased by $32.2 million, or 27.7%, to $148.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016, primarily related to impairment charges on intangible assets as well as costs associated with acquisitions, amortization expense on acquired intangibles, amortization expense related to mortgage servicing rights, and other tax expenses.

We had a gain on divestiture of $0.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2017. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we had a gain on divestiture of $7.0 million related to the sale of certain cost method investments.

Gains (losses) on equity method investments increased by $1.4 million, or 56.5%, to a gain of $4.0 million, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to a gain of $2.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Gains (losses) on equity method investments represent our pro rata share of the net gains or losses on investments over which we have significant influence but which we do not control.

Other income (loss) decreased by $0.3 million, or 0.3%, to $97.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The $0.3 million decrease was primarily due to a gain of $18.3 million related to an adjustment of future earn-out payments that will no longer be required which was recognized in the third quarter of 2016, partially offset by an increase in net realized and unrealized gains related to marketable securities.

Provision (benefit) for income taxes increased by $9.4 million, or 20.5%, to $55.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. This increase was primarily driven by an increase in pre-tax earnings. In general, our consolidated effective tax rate can vary from period to period depending on, among other factors, the geographic and business mix of our earnings.

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries increased by $21.2 million, or 45.3%, to $68.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. This increase was primarily driven by an increase in earnings.

The business segments are determined based on the products and services provided and reflect the manner in which financial information is evaluated by management. We evaluate the performance and review the results of the segments based on each segment’s “Income (loss) from operations before income taxes.”

Certain financial information for our segments is presented below. The amounts shown below for the Financial Services and Real Estate Services segments reflect the amounts that are used by management to allocate resources and assess performance, which is based on each segment’s “Income (loss) from operations before income taxes.” In addition to the two business segments, the tables below include a “Corporate Items” category. Corporate revenues include fees from related parties and interest income. Corporate expenses include non-cash compensation expenses (such as the grant of exchangeability to limited partnership units, redemption/exchange of partnership units, issuance of restricted shares and allocations of net income to founding/working partner units and limited partnership units), as well as unallocated expenses, such as certain professional and consulting fees, executive compensation and interest expense, which are managed separately at the corporate level. Corporate other income (losses), net includes gains that are not considered part of the Company’s ordinary, ongoing business, such as the adjustment of future earn-out payments.

The following table sets forth our unaudited quarterly results of operations for the indicated periods (in thousands). Results of any period are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year and may, in certain periods, be affected by seasonal fluctuations in our business. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the current period’s presentation.

	September 30, 2017		June 30, 2017		March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016			September 30, 2016^1,2		June 30, 2016¹		March 31, 2016¹			December 31, 2015^1,3
Revenues:
Commissions	$	582,106	$	577,172	$	545,720	$	520,374		$	492,808	$	497,652	$	474,833		$	506,538
Principal transactions		75,766		80,360		85,743		70,262			76,332		86,448		92,439			74,184
Gains from mortgage banking activities, net		45,455		73,547		45,261		54,378			65,377		43,599		30,033			38,301
Real estate management and other services		60,798		51,589		50,630		55,841			49,373		45,529		46,058			51,121
Servicing fees		29,057		26,840		24,832		25,472			22,502		20,725		18,972			19,395
Fees from related parties		7,173		6,018		6,938		6,484			6,354		5,262		7,470			6,251
Data, software and post-trade		13,776		13,322		13,087		12,949			13,266		14,160		13,934			30,505
Interest income		11,726		19,177		10,006		9,544			8,012		7,168		9,152			7,424
Other revenues		1,171		876		976		454			796		402		3,682			1,183
Total revenues		827,028		848,901		783,193		755,758			734,820		720,945		696,573			734,902
Expenses:
Compensation and employee benefits		495,145		482,353		460,631		426,458			439,384		439,101		428,264			495,648
Allocations of net income and grants of exchangeability to limited partnership units and FPUs		48,446		50,237		63,193		60,264			58,771		40,975		32,924			145,718
Total compensation and employee benefits		543,591		532,590		523,824		486,722			498,155		480,076		461,188			641,366
Occupancy and equipment		51,962		50,311		50,829		50,255			49,032		51,999		52,661			57,630
Fees to related parties		4,380		5,519		6,490		8,683			5,323		3,692		6,445			5,100
Professional and consulting fees		24,486		22,891		21,670		17,176			17,624		15,741		16,667			15,835
Communications		33,290		32,353		32,173		30,735			31,562		31,628		31,667			31,237
Selling and promotion		26,828		30,034		24,641		24,989			23,139		26,175		26,299			27,496
Commissions and floor brokerage		10,410		10,476		10,430		10,505			8,645		10,210		9,155			9,598
Interest expense		24,425		26,490		18,763		17,595			18,831		16,622		18,317			19,957
Other expenses		55,600		50,269		42,393		28,138			37,428		38,292		40,355			77,930
Total expenses		774,972		760,933		731,213		674,798			689,739		674,435		662,754			886,149
Other income (losses), net:
Gain (loss) on divestiture and sale of investments		4	—			557	—				7,044		—	—				390,951
Gains (losses) on equity method investments		2,147		1,602		237		996			796		863		888			(687	)
Other income (loss)		88,195		4,713		5,020		(979	)		91,655		9,831		(3,294	)		30,903
Total other income (losses), net		90,346		6,315		5,814		17			99,495		10,694		(2,406	)		421,167
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes		142,402		94,283		57,794		80,977			144,576		57,204		31,413			269,920
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		31,854		16,552		6,678		14,614			30,273		10,571		4,874			79,486
Consolidated net income (loss)		110,548		77,731		51,116		66,363			114,303		46,633		26,539			190,434
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries		29,019		24,811		14,291		21,924			27,092		13,713		6,087			113,569
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	81,529	$	52,920	$	36,825	$	44,439		$	87,211	$	32,920	$	20,452		$	76,865

The table below details our brokerage revenues by product category for the indicated periods (in thousands):

	September 30, 2017			June 30, 2017			March 31, 2017			December 31, 2016			September 30, 2016			June 30, 2016			March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
Brokerage revenue by product:
Rates	$	123,041		$	133,469		$	135,752		$	116,117		$	112,384		$	120,678		$	119,619		$	108,060
Credit		66,133			70,730			81,870			62,294			67,221			77,330			84,915			63,399
Foreign exchange		83,899			79,681			80,026			70,816			73,191			76,835			82,468			75,167
Energy and commodities		48,231			48,479			53,145			54,111			47,061			57,306			64,398			57,061
Equities, insurance, and other asset classes		79,657			85,324			75,706			41,950			39,076			45,593			48,366			42,594
Leasing and other services		158,604			144,681			127,574			144,521			139,109			124,555			105,627			162,263
Real estate capital markets		98,307			95,168			77,390			100,827			91,098			81,803			61,879			72,178
Total brokerage revenues	$	657,872		$	657,532		$	631,463		$	590,636		$	569,140		$	584,100		$	567,272		$	580,722
Brokerage revenue by product (percentage):
Rates		18.7	%		20.3	%		21.5	%		19.7	%		19.7	%		20.7	%		21.1	%		18.6	%
Credit		10.1			10.8			13.0			10.5			11.8			13.2			15.0			10.9
Foreign exchange		12.8			12.1			12.7			12.0			12.9			13.2			14.5			12.9
Energy and commodities		7.3			7.4			8.4			9.2			8.3			9.8			11.4			9.8
Equities, insurance, and other asset classes		12.1			13.0			12.0			7.1			6.9			7.8			8.5			7.3
Leasing and other services		24.1			22.0			20.2			24.5			24.4			21.3			18.6			27.9
Real estate capital markets		14.9			14.4			12.2			17.0			16.0			14.0			10.9			12.6
Total brokerage revenues		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Brokerage revenue by type:
Real Estate	$	256,911		$	239,849		$	204,964		$	245,348		$	230,207		$	206,358		$	167,506		$	234,441
Financial Services voice/hybrid		361,312			373,161			380,260			310,313			303,364			336,658			357,071			312,076
Financial Services fully electronic		39,649			44,522			46,239			34,975			35,569			41,084			42,695			34,205
Total brokerage revenues	$	657,872		$	657,532		$	631,463		$	590,636		$	569,140		$	584,100		$	567,272		$	580,722
Brokerage revenue by type (percentage):
Real Estate		39.1	%		36.5	%		32.5	%		41.5	%		40.4	%		35.3	%		29.5	%		40.4	%
Financial Services voice/hybrid		54.9			56.7			60.2			52.5			53.3			57.6			63.0			53.7
Financial Services fully electronic		6.0			6.8			7.3			6.0			6.3			7.1			7.5			5.9
Total brokerage revenues		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

Our balance sheet and business model are not capital intensive. Our assets consist largely of cash, marketable securities, mortgage servicing rights, collateralized multi-family and commercial mortgage loans to be included in future sales, which are included in loans held for sale, collateralized and uncollateralized short-dated receivables and less liquid assets needed to support our business. Longer-term capital (equity and notes payable) is held to support the less liquid assets and potential capital intensive opportunities. Total assets at September 30, 2017 were $7.3 billion, an increase of 43.7% as compared to December 31, 2016. The increase in total assets was driven primarily by increases in Receivables from broker-dealers, clearing organizations, customers and related broker-dealers, Accrued commissions receivable, net, Marketable securities, Investments, and Cash segregated under regulatory requirements, which were partially offset by a reduction in Loans held for sale. We maintain a significant portion of our assets in cash and marketable securities, with our liquidity (which we define as Cash and cash equivalents, Reverse repurchase agreements, Marketable securities and Securities owned, less Securities loaned and Repurchase agreements) at September 30, 2017 of

$700.7 million. See “Liquidity Analysis” below for a further discussion of our liquidity. Our Securities owned decreased to $32.1 million at September 30, 2017, compared to $35.4 million at December 31, 2016. Our Marketable securities increased to $259.4 million at September 30, 2017, compared to $164.8 million at December 31, 2016. The increase in marketable securities in the nine months ending September 30, 2017, was primarily due to the recognition of $77 million in gains in connections with the Nasdaq earn-out and $20.8 million of mark-to-market movements and/or hedging associated with previously earned Nasdaq shares (as discussed in Note 9—Marketable Securities.”) We did not have any Reverse repurchase agreements as of September 30, 2017, which was a decrease of $54.7 million from December 31, 2016. We had Securities loaned of $135.1 million and Repurchase agreements of $1.8 million at September 30, 2017. There were no Securities loaned or Repurchase agreements as of December 31, 2016.

On April 21, 2017, pursuant to a previously disclosed authorization by the Audit Committee of BGC’s Board of Directors, the Company entered into a $150.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with an affiliate of Cantor. BGC agreed to lend $150.0 million under the Credit Facility to such affiliate (the “Loan”). On September 8, 2017, the outstanding balance of $150 million was repaid in its entirety. As of the date hereof, there were no borrowings outstanding under the credit facility. The Credit Facility has a maturity date of April 20, 2018, which may be extended from time to time on the terms set forth in the Credit Facility.

As part of our cash management process, we may enter into tri-party reverse repurchase agreements and other short-term investments, some of which may be with Cantor. As of December 31, 2016, Cantor facilitated reverse repurchase agreements on our behalf, and consequently we had $54.7 million of reverse repurchase agreements outstanding with Cantor. As of September 30, 2017, we had no reverse purchase agreements outstanding with Cantor.

Additionally, in August 2013, the Audit Committee authorized us to invest up to $350 million in an asset-backed commercial paper program for which certain Cantor entities serve as placement agent and referral agent. The program issues short-term notes to money market investors and is expected to be used from time to time as a liquidity management vehicle. The notes are backed by assets of highly rated banks. We are entitled to invest in the program so long as the program meets investment policy guidelines, including policies relating to ratings. Cantor will earn a spread between the rate it receives from the short-term note issuer and the rate it pays to us on any investments in this program. This spread will be no greater than the spread earned by Cantor for placement of any other commercial paper note in the program. As of September 30, 2017, we had no investments in the program.

Our funding base consists of longer-term capital (equity and notes payable), collateralized financings, shorter-term liabilities and accruals that are a natural outgrowth of specific assets and/or our business model, such as matched fails and accrued compensation. We have limited need for short-term unsecured funding in our regulated entities for their brokerage business. Our Real Estate Services business has the following ongoing cash needs: (i) ongoing short-term collateralized financing needs to fund loans held for sale; (ii) working capital to support daily operations, including servicing advances consisting of principal and interest advances for Fannie Mae loans that become delinquent, and advances on insurance and tax payments if escrow funds are insufficient; and (iii) working capital to satisfy collateral requirements for our Fannie Mae DUS risk-sharing obligations and to meet the operational liquidity requirements of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, Ginnie Mae, and our warehouse facility lenders. Contingent liquidity needs are largely limited to potential cash collateral that may be needed to meet clearing bank, clearinghouse, and exchange margins and/or to fund fails. Capital expenditures tend to be cash neutral and approximately in line with depreciation. Current cash balances significantly exceed our potential contingent liquidity needs. We believe that cash in and available to our largest regulated entities, inclusive of financing provided by clearing banks and cash segregated under regulatory requirements, is adequate for potential cash demands of normal operations, such as margin or fail financing. We expect our operating activities going forward to generate adequate cash flows to fund normal operations, including any dividends paid pursuant to our dividend policy. However, we believe that there are a significant number of capital intensive opportunities for us to maximize our growth and strategic position, including, among other things, acquisitions, strategic alliances and joint ventures potentially involving all types and combinations of equity, debt and acquisition alternatives. As a result, we may need to raise additional funds to:

Acquisitions and financial reporting obligations related thereto may impact our ability to access capital markets on a timely basis and may necessitate greater short-term borrowings in the interim. This may impact our credit rating or the interest rates on our debt. We may need to access short-term capital sources to meet business needs from time to time, including, but not limited to, conducting operations; hiring or retaining brokers, salespeople, managers and other front-office personnel; financing acquisitions; and providing liquidity, including in situations where we may not be able to access the capital markets in a timely manner when desired by us. Accordingly, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain additional financing when needed on terms that are acceptable to us, if at all.

On September 8, 2017, BGC completed the acquisition of Berkeley Point (the “Berkeley Point Acquisition”), a leading commercial real estate finance company focused on the origination and sale of multifamily and other commercial real estate loans through government-sponsored and government-funded loan programs, as well as the servicing of commercial real estate loans, including those it originates. BGC acquired all of the outstanding membership interests of Berkeley Point Financial LLC for an acquisition price equal to $875 million, subject to a post-closing upward or downward adjustment to the extent that the net assets of BPF as of the closing of the Berkeley Point Acquisition were greater than or less than $508.6 million. BGC paid $3.2 million of the acquisition price with 247,099 partnership units in BGC Holdings, L.P. Contemporaneously with the Berkeley Point Acquisition, on September 8, 2017, the Company invested $100 million in a newly formed commercial real estate-related financial and investment business, Real Estate LP, which is controlled and managed by Cantor. Real Estate LP may conduct activities in any real estate related business or asset backed securities-related business or any extensions thereof and ancillary activities thereto. As of September 30, 2017, the Company’s investment is accounted for under the equity method. Berkeley Point and Real Estate LP are part of Newmark Knight Frank, the Company’s Real Estate Services segment. In connection with these aforementioned transactions, BGC entered into a $400 million two-year unsecured senior revolving credit facility and a $575 million unsecured senior term loan maturing on the second anniversary of the BPF acquisition closing date.

On October 23, 2017 Newmark Group, Inc. filed a registration statement on Form S-1 with the SEC relating to the proposed initial public offering (“IPO”) of the Class A common stock of BGC’s recently formed subsidiary, which will hold Newmark Knight Frank, the Company’s Real Estate Services business. The number of Class A shares to be offered and the price range for the proposed offering have not yet been determined. The initial public offering is part of the Company’s plan to separate its Real Estate Services business into a separate public company. Following some period after the expected offering, the Company may, subject to market and other conditions, distribute the shares that the Company will hold of the newly formed subsidiary pro rata to the Company’s stockholders in a manner intended to qualify as tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The proceeds of the Newmark IPO are expected to be used to repay the term loan.

On June 28, 2013, upon completion of the Nasdaq transaction, we received cash consideration of $750 million paid at closing, plus an earn-out of up to 14,883,705 shares of Nasdaq common stock to be paid ratably in each of the fifteen years following the closing. As a result of the earn-out, we expect to receive over $720 million in additional Nasdaq stock over time (stock value based on the October 26, 2017 closing price), which is not reflected on our balance sheet.

On January 12, 2016, we completed our acquisition (the “JPI Merger”) of Jersey Partners, Inc. (“JPI”). The JPI Merger occurred pursuant to a merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”), dated as of December 22, 2015. Shortly following the completion of the JPI Merger, a subsidiary of BGC merged with and into GFI pursuant to a short-form merger under Delaware law, with GFI continuing as the surviving entity. The Back-End Mergers allowed BGC to acquire the remaining approximately 33% of the outstanding shares of GFI common stock that BGC did not already own. Following the closing of the Back-End Mergers, BGC and its affiliates now own 100% of the outstanding shares of GFI’s common stock. In total, approximately 23.5 million shares of our Class A common stock and $89.9 million in cash were issued or paid with respect to the closing of the Back-End Mergers, inclusive of adjustments (we still expect to pay a total of $111.2 million in connection to the Back-End Mergers).

As of September 30, 2017, our liquidity, which we define as cash and cash equivalents, reverse repurchase agreements, marketable securities and securities owned, less securities loaned and repurchase agreements, was approximately $700.7 million. This does not include the over $720 million in additional Nasdaq stock (stock value based on the October 26, 2017 closing price) that we expect to receive over time. We expect to use our considerable financial resources to repay debt, profitably hire, make accretive acquisitions, pay dividends, and/or repurchase shares and units of BGC, all while maintaining or improving our investment grade rating.

On September 8, 2017, the Company entered into a committed unsecured senior term loan credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and a syndicate of lenders. The term loan credit agreement provides for loans of up to $575.0 million. The maturity date of the agreement is September 8, 2019. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at either LIBOR or a defined base rate plus an additional margin, which ranges from 50 basis points to 325 basis points depending on the Company’s debt rating as determined by S&P and Fitch and whether such loan is a LIBOR loan or a base rate loan. The term loan credit agreement is also subject to mandatory prepayment from 100% of net cash proceeds of all material asset sales and debt and equity issuances (subject to certain customary exceptions, including sales under the Company’s CEO sales program). As of September 30, 2017, there were $575.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the facility. The carrying value of the facility as of September 30, 2017 was $572.2 million, net of deferred financing costs of $2.8 million. As of September 30, 2017, the interest rate on this facility was 3.49%.

On June 26, 2012, we issued an aggregate of $112.5 million principal amount of 8.125% Senior Notes due 2042 (the “8.125% Senior Notes”). The 8.125% Senior Notes are our senior unsecured obligations. The 8.125% Senior Notes may be redeemed for cash, in whole or in part, on or after June 26, 2017, at our option, at any time and from time to time, until maturity at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount to be redeemed, plus accrued but unpaid interest on the principal amount being redeemed to, but not including, the redemption date. The 8.125% Senior Notes are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “BGCA.” The initial carrying value of the 8.125% Senior Notes was $108.7 million, net of debt issuance costs of $3.8 million. The carrying value of the 8.125% Senior Notes as of September 30, 2017 was $109.4 million.

On December 9, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of $300.0 million principal amount of 5.375% Senior Notes due 2019 (the “5.375% Senior Notes”). The 5.375% Senior Notes are general senior unsecured obligations of the Company. These 5.375% Senior Notes bear interest at a rate of 5.375% per year, payable in cash on June 9 and December 9 of each year, commencing June 9, 2015. The interest rate payable on the notes will be subject to adjustments from time to time based on the debt rating assigned by specified rating agencies to the notes, as set forth in the indenture. The 5.375% Senior Notes will mature on December 9, 2019. The Company may redeem some or all of the notes at any time or from time to time for cash at certain “make-whole” redemption prices (as set forth in the indenture). If a “Change of Control Triggering Event” (as defined in the indenture) occurs, holders may require the Company to purchase all or a portion of their notes for cash at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the purchase date. The initial carrying value of the 5.375% Senior Notes was $295.1 million, net of the discount and debt issuance costs of $4.9 million. The carrying value of the 5.375% Senior Notes as of September 30, 2017 was $297.8 million.

guaranteed the obligations of GFI under these 8.375% Senior Notes. These actions resulted in upgrades of the credit ratings of the 8.375% Senior Notes by Moody’s Investors Service, Fitch Ratings Inc. and Standard & Poor’s, which reduced the penalty interest to 25 basis points effective July 19, 2015. On November 4, 2015, GFI, BGC and the Trustee entered into the First Supplemental Indenture supplementing the Indenture and incorporating BGC’s guarantee of the Notes (the “First Supplemental Indenture”). On January 13, 2016, Moody’s Investors Service further upgraded the credit rating on the 8.375% Senior Notes, eliminating the penalty interest.

On January 12, 2016, BGC Partners, Inc. entered into a second supplemental indenture, dated as of January 12, 2016 (the “Second Supplemental Indenture”), among GFI, BGC and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (the “Trustee”), supplementing the indenture, dated as of July 19, 2011, as supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture thereto, dated as of November 4, 2015 (the “Indenture”), among GFI, BGC and the Trustee, which governs the 8.375% Senior Notes, issued by GFI and fully and unconditionally guaranteed by BGC. The Second Supplemental Indenture modifies the reporting covenant in the Indenture to provide that, for so long as BGC (or another publicly reporting company controlling GFI) guarantees the 8.375% Senior Notes, the reports that BGC (or such other publicly reporting company controlling GFI) files with the SEC will be furnished to the Trustee in lieu of any GFI SEC reports. The amendments contained in the Second Supplemental Indenture became operative on January 12, 2016, upon GFI’s payment of the consent fee described therein. The final amount of the consent fee was approximately $8.00 per $1,000 principal amount. As a result, effective January 15, 2016, GFI ceased filing annual, quarterly and other reports with the SEC.

On May 27, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of $300.0 million principal amount of 5.125% Senior Notes due 2021 (the “5.125% Senior Notes”). The 5.125% Senior Notes are general senior unsecured obligations of the Company. These 5.125% Senior Notes bear interest at a rate of 5.125% per year, payable in cash on May 27 and November 27 of each year, commencing November 27, 2016. The 5.125% Senior Notes will mature on May 27, 2021. The Company may redeem some or all of the notes at any time or from time to time for cash at certain “make-whole” redemption prices (as set forth in the indenture). If a “Change of Control Triggering Event” (as defined in the indenture) occurs, holders may require the Company to purchase all or a portion of its notes for cash at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the purchase date. Cantor purchased $15.0 million of such senior notes and still holds such notes as of September 30, 2017. The initial carrying value of the 5.125% Senior Notes was $295.8 million, net of the discount and debt issuance costs of $4.2 million. The carrying value of the 5.125% Senior Notes as of September 30, 2017 was $296.8 million.

On July 29, 2011, the Company issued an aggregate of $160.0 million principal amount of 4.50% Convertible Notes due July 15, 2016 (the “4.50% Convertible Notes”). On July 13, 2016, certain holders of the 4.50% Convertible Notes converted $68,000 in principal amount of notes, and, upon conversion, the Company delivered 6,909 shares of its Class A common stock to such holders. On July 15, 2016, the Company repaid the remaining approximately $159.9 million principal amount of its 4.50% Convertible Notes at maturity.

On May 31, 2017, the Company entered into a secured loan arrangement of $29.9 million under which it pledged certain fixed assets as security for a loan. This arrangement occurs interest at a fixed rate of 3.44% and matures on May 31, 2021. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had $28.2 million outstanding related to this secured loan arrangement. The value of the fixed assets pledged as of September 30, 2017 was $21.6 million.

The Company uses its warehouse lines and a repurchase agreement to fund mortgage loans originated under its various lending programs. Outstanding borrowings against these lines are collateralized by an assignment of the underlying mortgages and third party purchase commitments. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had $950.0 million of warehouse lines and $325.0 million of uncommitted repurchase agreements (collectively, the “Agency Warehouse Facilities”). As of September 30, 2017, $659.7 million of the Agency Warehouse Facilities was drawn down.

On March 11, 2015, the Company and CCRE entered into a note receivable/payable that allows for advances to or from CCRE at an interest rate of 1 month LIBOR plus 1.0%. As of December 31, 2016, there was $690.0 million of outstanding advances due to CCRE on the note. On September 8, 2017, the note receivable/payable was terminated and all outstanding advances due were paid off.

On February 25, 2016, the Company entered into a committed unsecured revolving credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and a syndicate of lenders. Several of our domestic non-regulated subsidiaries are parties to the credit agreement as guarantors. The credit agreement provides for revolving loans of $150.0 million, with the option to increase the aggregate loans to $200.0 million. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at either LIBOR or a defined base rate plus an additional margin which ranges from 50 basis points to 250 basis points depending on our debt rating as determined by S&P and Fitch and whether such loan is a LIBOR loan or a base rate loan. This facility was terminated on September 8, 2017, at which point the outstanding balance of $150.0 million was repaid. There were no borrowings outstanding under this $150.0 million facility as of September 30, 2017 and as of December 31, 2016.

On August 23, 2017, the Company entered into a committed unsecured credit agreement with Itau Unibanco S.A. The credit agreement provides for an intra-day overdraft credit line of up to $15.8 million (BRL 50.0 million). The maturity date of the agreement is December 14, 2017. This facility bears a fee of 1.00% per year. As of September 30, 2017, there were no borrowings outstanding under this facility.

We may raise additional funds from time to time through equity or debt financing, including public and private sales of debt securities, to finance our business, operations and possible acquisitions.

Credit ratings and associated outlooks are influenced by a number of factors, including but not limited to: operating environment, earnings and profitability trends, the prudence of funding and liquidity management practices, balance sheet size/composition and resulting leverage, cash flow coverage of interest, composition and size of the capital base, available liquidity, outstanding borrowing levels and the firm’s competitive position in the industry. A credit rating and/or the associated outlook can be revised upward or downward at any time by a rating agency if such rating agency decides that circumstances warrant such a change. Any reduction in our credit ratings and/or the associated outlook could adversely affect the availability of debt financing on terms acceptable to us, as well as the cost and other terms upon which we are able to obtain any such financing. In addition, credit ratings and associated outlooks may be important to customers or counterparties when we compete in certain markets and when we seek to engage in certain transactions. In connection with certain agreements, we may be required to provide additional collateral in the event of a credit ratings downgrade.

We consider our liquidity to be comprised of the sum of Cash and cash equivalents, Reverse repurchase agreements, Marketable securities, and Securities owned, less Securities loaned and Repurchase agreements. The discussion below describes the key components of our liquidity analysis, including earnings, dividends and distributions, net investing and funding activities, including

repurchases and redemptions of Class A common stock and partnership units, security settlements, changes in securities held and marketable securities, and changes in our working capital.

Our liquidity analysis includes a comparison of our Consolidated net income (loss) adjusted for certain non-cash items (e.g., grants of exchangeability) as presented on the cash flow statement. Dividends and distributions are payments made to our holders of common shares and limited partnership interests and are related to earnings from prior periods. These timing differences will impact our cash flows in a given period.

Our investing and funding activities represent a combination of our capital raising activities, including short-term borrowings and repayments, warehouse notes payable borrowings and repayments, issuances of shares under our controlled equity offerings (net), Class A common stock repurchases and partnership unit redemptions, purchases and sales of securities, dispositions, and other investments (e.g. acquisitions, forgivable loans to new brokers and capital expenditures—all net of depreciation and amortization).

Our securities settlement activities primarily represent deposits with clearing organizations. In addition, when advantageous, we may elect to facilitate the settlement of matched principal transactions by funding failed trades, which results in a temporary secured use of cash and is economically beneficial to us.

Other changes in working capital represent changes primarily in loans held for sale, receivables and payables and accrued liabilities that impact our liquidity.

Changes in Reverse repurchase agreements, Securities owned and Marketable securities may result from additional cash investments or sales, which will be offset by a corresponding change in Cash and cash equivalents and accordingly will not result in a change in our liquidity. Conversely, changes in the market value of such securities and the receipt of the Nasdaq earn-out in the form of additional Nasdaq shares are reflected in our earnings or other comprehensive income (loss) and will result in changes in our liquidity.

As of September 30, 2017, the Company had $546.0 million of Cash and cash equivalents, and included in this amount was $282.8 million of Cash and cash equivalents held by foreign subsidiaries. With the exception of the cash proceeds from the sale of Trayport, it is our intention to permanently reinvest undistributed foreign pre-tax earnings in the Company’s foreign operations. It is not practicable to determine the amount of additional tax that may be payable in the event these earnings are repatriated due to the fluctuation of the relative ownership percentages of the foreign subsidiaries between the Company and BGC Holdings, L.P. For these proceeds which are not permanently reinvested, the accrued tax liability is $135.5 million, net of foreign tax credits. In addition, certain GFI net operating loss carryforwards are expected to be utilized to reduce cash taxes. Taking these items together, we therefore expect to pay effective cash taxes of no more than $64.0 million related to the Trayport transaction.

The $89.7 million decrease in our liquidity position from $790.4 million as of December 31, 2016 to $700.7 million as of September 30, 2017 was primarily related to the acquisition of Berkeley Point for $875 million and the investment of $100 million in Real Estate LP, which was offset by the proceeds from the $400 million unsecured senior revolving credit facility and the $575 million unsecured senior term loan; cash paid with respect to various acquisitions; the previously described redemption and/or repurchase of shares and/or units; and ordinary movements in working capital. The Company also continued to invest in new revenue-generating hires.

The $226.5 million decrease in our liquidity position from $1,127.9 million as of December 31, 2015 to $901.4 million as of September 30, 2016 was primarily related to repayment of $159.9 million used to retire BGC’s 4.5% Convertible senior notes; $111.2 million used with respect to the GFI Back-End Mergers and related transactions; the redemption and/or repurchase of 10.0 million shares and/or units, net, at a cost to BGC of $87.8 million; ordinary charges in working capital; and cash paid with respect to various acquisitions. The Company also continued to invest with regards to new front-office hires in Real Estate Services. These items were partially offset by net proceeds from BGC’s offering of $300 million aggregate principle amount of 5.125% Senior Notes due May 27, 2021 issued in May 2016.

In November 2008, we entered into a clearing capital agreement with Cantor to clear U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agency securities transactions on our behalf. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, so long as Cantor is providing clearing services to us, Cantor shall be entitled to request from us, and we shall post as soon as practicable, cash or other property acceptable to Cantor in the amount reasonably requested by Cantor under the clearing capital agreement. Cantor had not requested any cash or other property from us as collateral as of September 30, 2017.

Our liquidity and available cash resources are restricted by regulatory requirements of our Financial Services operating subsidiaries. Many of these regulators, including U.S. and non-U.S. government agencies and self-regulatory organizations, as well as state securities commissions in the U.S., are empowered to conduct administrative proceedings that can result in censure, fine, the issuance of cease-and-desist orders or the suspension or expulsion of a broker-dealer. In addition, self-regulatory organizations, such as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and the National Futures Association (“NFA”), along with statutory bodies such as the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”), the SEC, and the CFTC require strict compliance with their rules and regulations. The requirements imposed by regulators are designed to ensure the integrity of the financial markets and to protect customers and other third parties who deal with broker-dealers and are not designed to specifically protect stockholders. These regulations often serve to limit our activities, including through net capital, customer protection and market conduct requirements.

The FCA is the relevant statutory regulator in the United Kingdom. The FCA’s objectives are to protect customers, maintain the stability of the financial services industry and promote competition between financial services providers. It has broad rule-making, investigative and enforcement powers derived from the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and subsequent and derivative legislation and regulations.

In addition, the majority of our other foreign subsidiaries are subject to similar regulation by the relevant authorities in the countries in which they do business. Additionally, certain other of our foreign subsidiaries are required to maintain non-U.S. net capital requirements. In Hong Kong, BGC Securities (Hong Kong), LLC and GFI (HK) Securities LLC are regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission. BGC Capital Markets (Hong Kong), Limited and GFI (HK) Brokers Ltd are regulated by The Hong Kong Monetary Authority. All are subject to Hong Kong net capital requirements. In France, Aurel BGC and BGC France Holdings; in Australia, BGC Partners (Australia) Pty Limited, BGC (Securities) Pty Limited and GFI Australia Pty Ltd.; in Japan, BGC Shoken Kaisha Limited’s Japanese branch; in Singapore, BGC Partners (Singapore) Limited, BGC Securities (Singapore) Ltd and GFI Group PTE Ltd; in Korea, BGC Capital Markets & Foreign Exchange Broker (Korea) Limited and GFI Korea Money Brokerage Limited; and in Turkey, BGC Partners Menkul Degerler AS, all have net capital requirements imposed upon them by local regulators. In addition, the LCH (LIFFE/LME) clearing organization, of which BGC L.P. is a member, also imposes minimum capital requirements. In Latin America, BGC Liquidez Distribuidora De Titulos E Valores Mobiliarios Ltda. (Brazil) has net capital requirements imposed upon it by local regulators.

In addition, these subsidiaries may be prohibited from repaying the borrowings of their parents or affiliates, paying cash dividends, making loans to their parent or affiliates or otherwise entering into transactions, in each case, that result in a significant reduction in their regulatory capital position without prior notification or approval from their principal regulator. See Note 28—“Regulatory Requirements,” to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further details on our regulatory requirements.

As of September 30, 2017, $547.7 million of net assets were held by regulated subsidiaries. As of September 30, 2017, these subsidiaries had aggregate regulatory net capital, as defined, in excess of the aggregate regulatory requirements, as defined, of $296.2 million.

Certain of the Company’s agreements with Fannie Mae allow the Company to originate and service loans under Fannie Mae’s DUS Program. These agreements require the Company to maintain sufficient collateral to meet Fannie Mae’s restricted and operational liquidity requirements based on a pre-established formula. Certain of the Company’s agreements with Freddie Mac allow the Company to service loans under Freddie Mac’s Targeted Affordable Housing Program (“TAH”). These agreements require the Company to pledge sufficient collateral to meet Freddie Mac’s liquidity requirement of 8% of the outstanding principal of TAH loans serviced by the Company. Management believes that as of September 30, 2017 that the Company met all liquidity requirements.

In April 2013, our Board of Directors and Audit Committee authorized management to enter into indemnification agreements with Cantor and its affiliates with respect to the provision of any guarantees provided by Cantor and its affiliates from time to time as required by regulators. These services may be provided from time to time at a reasonable and customary fee.

BGC Derivative Markets and GFI Swaps Exchange, our subsidiaries, began operating as SEFs on October 2, 2013. Both BGC Derivative Markets and GFI Swaps Exchange received permanent registration approval from the CFTC as SEFs on January 22, 2016. Mandatory Dodd-Frank Act compliant execution on SEFs by eligible U.S. persons commenced in February 2014 for “made available to trade” products, and a wide range of other rules relating to the execution and clearing of derivative products have been finalized with implementation periods in 2016 and beyond. We also own ELX, which became a dormant contract market on July 1, 2017. ELX intends on taking the necessary steps to reinstate its trading permissions.

Much of our global derivatives volumes continue to be executed by non-U.S. based clients outside the U.S. and subject to local prudential regulations. As such, we will continue to operate a number of EU regulated venues in accordance with EU directives and licensed by the FCA and other EU based national Competent Authorities. The second Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (“MiFID II”) was published by the European Securities and Markets Authority (“ESMA”) in September 2015, and implementation is expected to commence in January 2018.

MiFID II will require a significant part of the market in these instruments to trade on trading venues subject to transparency regimes, not only in pre-and post-trade prices, but also in fee structures and access. In addition, it will have a particularly significant impact in a number of key areas, including corporate governance, transaction reporting, pre- and post-trade transparency, technology synchronization, best execution and investor protection. As was the case with the introduction of Dodd-Frank Act, including the ramification of Title VII across the financial markets, it is expected there will be a lengthy time period before all of the Regulatory Technical Standards are completely operative.

MiFID II is intended to help improve the functioning of the EU single market by achieving a greater consistency of regulatory standards. By design, therefore, it is intended that Member States should have very similar regulatory regimes in relation to the matters addressed to MiFID. MiFID II will also introduce a new regulated execution venue category known as the Organized Trading Facility (“OTF”) that will capture much of the voices and hybrid oriented trading in EU. Much of our existing EU derivatives and fixed income execution business will in the future take place on OTFs. Rules on public and non-discriminatory pricing structures of venues, and the related uncertainty of retaining traditional forms of revenue under the new regime, are expected to be a focus of our UK regulated entities. We currently anticiapate operating one OTF for each such UK regulated entity. In addition, the June 23, 2016

U.K. referendum vote to leave the EU and the UK Government triggering Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty (thereby setting in motion the timetable for the U.K. to leave the EU) may impact future market structure and MiFID II rulemaking and implementation due to potential changes in mutual passporting between the U.K. and EU Member States.

See “Regulation” in Part I, Item 1 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information related to our regulatory environment.

On June 22, 2016, at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company, the stockholders approved an amendment to the BGC Partners, Inc. amended and restated certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Class A common stock from 500 million shares to 750 million shares.

Changes in shares of the Company’s Class A common stock outstanding for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:

On June 22, 2016, at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company, the stockholders approved an amendment to the BGC Partners, Inc. amended and restated certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Class B common stock from 100 million shares to 150 million shares and to provide that Class B common stock shall be issued only to certain affiliated entities or related persons.

Our Board of Directors and Audit Committee have authorized repurchases of our Class A common stock and redemptions of BGC Holdings limited partnership interests or other equity interests in our subsidiaries. On February 7, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors and Audit Committee increased the Company’s share repurchase and unit redemption authorization to $300 million. From time to time, we may actively continue to repurchase shares or redeem units.

On February 23, 2016, we purchased from Cantor 5,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock at a price of $8.72 per share, the closing price on the date of the transaction. The transaction was included in our stock repurchase authorization. The transaction

was approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. On February 23, 2016, we purchased from The Cantor Fitzgerald Relief Fund (the “Relief Fund”) 970,639 shares of our Class A common stock at a price of $8.72 per share, the closing price on the date of the transaction. On November 16, 2016, we purchased from the Relief Fund 166,238 shares of our Class A common stock at a price of $9.74 per share, the closing price on the date of the transaction.

The table below represents unit redemption and share repurchase activity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

The table above represents the gross unit redemptions and share repurchases of our Class A common stock during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Approximately 5.4 million of the 6.5 million units above were redeemed using cash from our CEO program, and therefore did not impact the fully diluted number of shares and units outstanding or our liquidity position. The remaining redemptions along with the Class A common stock repurchases resulted in a 2.3 million reduction in the fully diluted share count. This net reduction cost the Company approximately $27.0 million (or $11.52 per share/unit) during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. This reduction partially offset the overall growth in the fully diluted share count which resulted from shares issued for general corporate purposes, acquisitions, equity-based compensation and front-office hires.

The fully diluted weighted-average share count for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was as follows (in thousands):

In November 2013, we entered into the Ninth Amendment to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Partnership, which created new preferred partnership units that may not be made exchangeable into our Class A common stock and are only entitled to a distribution each quarter at a rate of either 0.6875% (which is 2.75% per calendar year) or such other amount as set forth in the award documentation, and accordingly they will not be included in the fully diluted share count. Going forward, we intend to continue to reduce our overall rate of fully diluted share count growth by utilizing these new preferred partnership units.

Similarly, in May 2014 we entered into the Tenth Amendment to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of BGC Holdings. Pursuant to this amendment, NPSUs may not be made exchangeable into shares of the Company’s Class A common stock and will not be allocated any items of profit or loss.

Subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee or its designee, certain N Units may be converted into the underlying unit type (i.e. an NREU will be converted into an REU) and will then participate in Partnership distributions, subject to terms and conditions determined by the general partner of BGC Holdings in its sole discretion, including that the recipient continue to provide substantial services to the Company and comply with his or her partnership obligations. Such N Units are not included in the fully diluted share count.

On December 14, 2016, we entered into the Twelfth Amendment to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Partnership, effective as of October 1, 2016 (the “Twelfth Amendment”), which was entered into to amend certain terms and conditions of the Partnership’s N Units in order to provide flexibility to the Company and the Partnership in using such N Units in connection with compensation arrangements and practices. The Twelfth Amendment provides for a minimum $5 million gross revenue requirement in a given quarter as a condition for an N Unit to be replaced by another type of Partnership unit in accordance with the Partnership Agreement and the grant documentation. The Twelfth Amendment was approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.

On June 5, 2015, we entered into an agreement with Cantor providing Cantor, CF Group Management, Inc. (“CFGM”) and other Cantor affiliates entitled to hold Class B common stock the right to exchange from time to time, on a one-to-one basis, subject to adjustment, up to an aggregate of 34,649,693 shares of Class A common stock now owned or subsequently acquired by such Cantor entities for up to an aggregate of 34,649,693 shares of Class B common stock. Such shares of Class B common stock, which currently can be acquired upon the exchange of exchangeable limited partnership units owned in BGC Holdings, are already included in our fully diluted share count and will not increase Cantor’s current maximum potential voting power in the common equity. The exchange

agreement will enable the Cantor entities to acquire the same number of shares of Class B common stock that they are already entitled to acquire without having to exchange its exchangeable limited partnership units in BGC Holdings. Our Audit Committee and full Board of Directors determined that it was in the best interests of us and our stockholders to approve the exchange agreement because it will help ensure that Cantor retains its exchangeable limited partnership units in BGC Holdings, which is the same partnership in which our partner employees participate, thus continuing to align the interests of Cantor with those of the partner employees.

Under the exchange agreement, Cantor and CFGM have the right to exchange the 14,676,743 shares of Class A common stock owned by them as of September 30, 2017 for the same number of shares of Class B common stock. Cantor would also have the right to exchange any shares of Class A common stock subsequently acquired by it for shares of Class B common stock, up to 34,649,693 shares of Class B common stock.

We and Cantor have agreed that any shares of Class B common stock issued in connection with the exchange agreement would be deducted from the aggregate number of shares of Class B common stock that may be issued to the Cantor entities upon exchange of exchangeable limited partnership units in BGC Holdings. Accordingly, the Cantor entities will not be entitled to receive any more shares of Class B Stock under this agreement than they were previously eligible to receive upon exchange of exchangeable limited partnership units.

No shares of our Class A common stock related to the exercise of stock options were issued during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. We issued 17,403 shares of our Class A common stock related to the exercise of stock options during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

We currently have in place an effective equity shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 (the “Form S-3 Registration Statement”) with respect to the issuance and sale of up to 20 million shares of our Class A common stock from time to time on a delayed or continuous basis. On November 20, 2014, we entered into a controlled equity offering sales agreement with CF&Co (the “November 2014 Sales Agreement”), pursuant to which we may offer and sell up to an aggregate of 20 million shares of our Class A common stock. On April 12, 2017, we entered into a controlled equity offering sales agreement with CF&Co (the “April 2017 Sales Agreement), pursuant to which we may offer and sell up to an aggregate of 20 million shares of our Class A common stock. Shares of our Class A common stock sold under our controlled equity offering sales agreement are used primarily for redemptions and exchanges of limited partnership interests in BGC Holdings. CF&Co is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cantor and an affiliate of us. Under the November 2014 Sales Agreement and April 2017 Sales Agreement, we have agreed to pay CF&Co 2% of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares.

As of September 30, 2017, we have issued and sold an aggregate of 19.5 million shares of Class A common stock under the Form S-3 Registration Statement pursuant to the November 2014 Sales Agreement, with 0.5 million shares of Class A common stock remaining to be sold under this agreement. As of September 30, 2017, we have not sold any shares of Class A common stock under the April 2017 Sales Agreement. We intend to use the net proceeds of any shares of Class A common stock sold for general corporate purposes, including potential acquisitions, redemptions of limited partnership units and founding/working partner units in BGC Holdings and repurchases of shares of Class A common stock from partners, executive officers and other employees of ours or our subsidiaries and of Cantor and its affiliates. Certain of such partners will be expected to use the proceeds from such sales to repay outstanding loans issued by, or credit enhanced by, Cantor or BGC Holdings. In addition to general corporate purposes, these sales along with our share buy-back authorization are designed as a planning device in order to facilitate the redemption process. Going forward, we may redeem units and reduce our fully diluted share count under our repurchase authorization or later sell Class A shares under this agreement.

Further, we have an effective registration statement on Form S-4 (the “Form S-4 Registration Statement”), with respect to the offer and sale of up to 20 million shares of Class A common stock from time to time in connection with business combination transactions, including acquisitions of other businesses, assets, properties or securities. As of September 30, 2017, we have issued an aggregate of 10.5 million shares of Class A common stock under the Form S-4 Registration Statement, all in connection with acquisitions in the real estate brokerage industry. We also have an effective shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 pursuant to which we can offer and sell up to 10 million shares of our Class A common stock under the BGC Partners, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan. As of September 30, 2017, we have issued approximately 328.3 thousand shares of our Class A common stock under the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan.

On June 15, 2015, we filed a resale registration statement on Form S-3 with respect to 24,042,599 shares of our Class A common stock that Cantor received on April 13, 2015 in the conversion of the 8.75% Convertible Notes. These shares may be sold from time to time by Cantor or by certain of its pledgees, donees, distributees, counterparties, transferees or other successors in

interest of the shares, including banks or other financial institutions which may enter into stock pledge, stock loan or other financing transactions with Cantor or its affiliates, as well as by their respective pledgees, donees, distributees, counterparties, transferees or other successors in interest.

Our Compensation Committee may grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, deferred stock such as RSUs, bonus stock, performance awards, dividend equivalents and other equity-based awards, including to provide exchange rights for shares of our Class A common stock upon exchange of limited partnership units and founding/working partner units. On June 22, 2016, at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders approved our Seventh Amended and Restated Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”) to increase from 350 million to 400 million the aggregate number of shares of our Class A common stock that may be delivered or cash-settled pursuant to awards granted during the life of the Equity Plan. As of September 30, 2017, the limit on the aggregate number of shares authorized to be delivered allowed for the grant of future awards relating to 199.2 million shares.

On October 9, 2015, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 pursuant to which CF&Co may make offers and sales of our 8.125% Senior Notes and 5.375% Senior Notes in connection with ongoing market-making transactions which may occur from time to time. Such market-making transactions in these securities may occur in the open market or may be privately negotiated at prevailing market prices at a time of resale or at related or negotiated prices. Neither CF&Co, nor any other of our affiliates, has any obligation to make a market in our securities, and CF&Co or any such other affiliate may discontinue market-making activities at any time without notice.

On January 12, 2016, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 with respect to the 23,481,192 shares of our Class A common stock that we issued to the stockholders of JPI in the Back-End Mergers on January 12, 2016. These shares may be offered and sold from time to time by the JPI stockholders for their own account or by certain pledgees, donees, transferees, or other successors in interest of the shares, including banks or other financial institutions which may enter into stock pledge or other financing transactions with the JPI stockholders.

On August 17, 2017, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 pursuant to which CF&Co may make offers and sales of our 5.125% Senior Notes in connection with ongoing market-making transactions which may occur from time to time. Such market-making transactions in these securities may occur in the open market or may be privately negotiated at prevailing market prices at a time of resale or at related or negotiated prices. Neither CF&Co, nor any other of our affiliates, has any obligation to make a market in our securities, and CF&Co or any such other affiliate may discontinue market-making activities at any time without notice.

Since 2012, the Company has completed acquisitions whose purchase price included an aggregate of approximately 10.9 million shares of the Company’s Class A common stock (with an acquisition date fair value of approximately $64.1 million), 10.6 million limited partnership units (with an acquisition date fair value of approximately $69.5 million) and $82.8 million in cash that may be issued contingent on certain targets being met through 2022.

As of September 30, 2017, the Company has issued 7.8 million shares of its Class A common stock, 6.7 million limited partnership units and $33.2 million in cash related to such contingent payments.

As of September 30, 2017, 3.0 million shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, 3.2 million limited partnership units and $31.4 million in cash remain to be issued if the targets are met.

Cantor has the right to purchase limited partnership interests (Cantor units) from BGC Holdings upon redemption of non-exchangeable founding/working partner units redeemed by BGC Holdings upon termination or bankruptcy of the founding/working partner. In addition, pursuant to the Sixth Amendment to the BGC Holdings Limited Partnership Agreement (the “Sixth Amendment”), where either current, terminating, or terminated partners are permitted by the Company to exchange any portion of their FPUs and Cantor consents to such exchangeability, the Company shall offer to Cantor the opportunity for Cantor to purchase the same number of new exchangeable limited partnership interests (Cantor units) in BGC Holdings at the price that Cantor would have paid for the FPUs had the Company redeemed them. Any such Cantor units purchased by Cantor are currently exchangeable for up to 34,649,693 shares of Class B common stock or, at Cantor’s election or if there are no such additional shares of Class B common stock, shares of Class A common stock, in each case on a one-for-one basis (subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments).

On November 4, 2015, the Company issued exchange rights with respect to, and Cantor purchased, in transactions exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, an aggregate of 1,775,481 exchangeable limited partnership units in BGC Holdings, as follows: In connection with the redemption by BGC Holdings of an aggregate of 588,356 non-exchangeable founding partner units from founding partners of BGC Holdings for an aggregate consideration of $2,296,801, Cantor purchased 554,196

exchangeable limited partnership units from BGC Holdings for an aggregate of $2,115,306 (after offset of a founding partner’s $46,289 debt due to Cantor). In addition, pursuant to the Sixth Amendment, on November 4, 2015, Cantor purchased 1,221,285 exchangeable limited partnership units from BGC Holdings for an aggregate consideration of $4,457,436 in connection with the grant of exchangeability and exchange of 1,221,285 founding partner units. Exchangeable limited partnership units held by Cantor are exchangeable by Cantor at any time on a one-for-one basis (subject to adjustment) for shares of Class A common stock of the Company.

Under rules adopted by the CFTC, all foreign introducing brokers engaging in transactions with U.S. persons are required to register with the NFA and either meet financial reporting and net capital requirements on an individual basis or obtain a guarantee agreement from a registered Futures Commission Merchant. Our European-based brokers engage from time to time in interest rate swap transactions with U.S.-based counterparties, and therefore we are subject to the CFTC requirements. CF&Co has entered into guarantees on our behalf (and on behalf of GFI), and we are required to indemnify CF&Co for the amounts, if any, paid by CF&Co on our behalf pursuant to this arrangement. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded fees of $31.3 thousand and $93.8 thousand with respect to these guarantees.

The Company was authorized to enter into loans, investments or other credit support arrangements for Aqua (see Note 17— “Related Party Transactions,” to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q); such arrangements are proportionally and on the same terms as similar arrangements between Aqua and Cantor. On October 27, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors and Audit Committee increased the authorized amount by an additional $4.0 million. The Company has been further authorized to provide counterparty or similar guarantees on behalf of Aqua from time to time, provided that liability for any such guarantees, as well as similar guarantees provided by Cantor, would be shared proportionally with Cantor.

During 2013, our executive officers participated in the Global Partnership Restructuring Program. In connection with the program, Messrs. Lynn, Windeatt and Sadler received an aggregate of 283,206 newly-issued BGC Holdings limited partnership units (equivalent to 9.75% of their non-exchangeable units that were redeemed in the above transactions). Upon any sale or other transfer by such executive officers of shares of restricted stock, a proportional number of these units will be redeemed for zero by BGC Holdings. These units are not expected to be made exchangeable into shares of Class A common stock. In connection with the sale of certain shares of restricted stock, an aggregate of 91,703 of such units held by Messrs. Lynn, Windeatt and Sadler were redeemed for zero on February 5, 2014, 6,377 of such units were redeemed for zero on December 5, 2014, 87,410 of such units were redeemed for zero on January 30, 2015, 69,408 of such units were redeemed for zero on February 24, 2016, and 3,152 of such units were redeemed for zero on September 30, 2016.

On February 24, 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the acceleration of the lapse of restrictions on transferability with respect to 612,958 shares of restricted stock held by our executive officers as follows: Mr. Lynn, 431,782 shares; Mr. Merkel, 150,382 shares; and Mr. Sadler, 30,794 shares. On February 24, 2016, Messrs. Lynn and Sadler sold these shares to the Company at $8.40 per share, and Mr. Merkel sold 120,000 of such shares to the Company at $8.40 per share. In connection with such transaction, 64,787 of Mr. Lynn’s and 4,621 of Mr. Sadler’s partnership units were redeemed for zero.

of Class A common stock at an exercise price of $8.80 per share. The net exercise of the option resulted in 51,064 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock being issued to Mr. Lutnick.

On April 4, 2016, Mr. McMurray commenced his employment with the Company as our Chief Financial Officer, and he executed a deed of adherence as a member of our U.K. Partnership, which we refer to as the “McMurray Deed.” Under the McMurray Deed, Mr. McMurray’s membership in the U.K. Partnership is terminable on six-months’ notice. Pursuant to the McMurray Deed, he is entitled to receive a base draw of £325,000 ($464,444 as of April 4, 2016). He is also entitled to an upfront payment of up to £100,000 ($142,905 as of April 4, 2016) in cash, which is subject to repayment under certain circumstances. Mr. McMurray will also be entitled to receive a bonus allocation of the U.K. Partnership’s profits payable in April 2017, absent his earlier termination for cause or resignation, in the amount of £425,000 ($607,346 as of April 4, 2016), which will be payable in the form of cash, non-cash (e.g., partnership units) or a combination thereof. Mr. McMurray will be eligible for a discretionary profit allocation, subject to the satisfactory achievement by Mr. McMurray of such performance goals as may be established by the Company’s Compensation Committee. Pursuant to the McMurray Deed, Mr. McMurray may (i) not compete with the U.K. Partnership or any affiliates or solicit clients or counterparties of the U.K. Partnership or any affiliate for 12 months after his termination, and (ii) not solicit members or employees of the U.K. Partnership or any affiliate to leave their employment with, or to discontinue the supply of their services to, the U.K. Partnership or any affiliate for 24 months after his termination.

On April 27, 2016, Mr. McMurray entered into an agreement with the Company providing for four future awards of partnership units in BGC Holdings L.P. having an aggregate notional value of £500,000 ($758,800 on April 27, 2016). Units having a notional value of £83,333 ($126,541 on April 27, 2016) will be granted on each of January 1, 2017, 2018 and 2019, and units having a notional value of £250,000 ($379,625 on April 27, 2016) will be granted on January 1, 2020, in each case in accordance with customary grant documentation, subject to applicable termination and other provisions of the U.K Partnership Agreement, and adjustments set forth in the applicable agreement. All such units will be immediately exchangeable into the Company’s Class A common stock on the date of grant and cash may be paid by the Company in lieu of the grant of such units. The number of units granted will be determined based on the closing price of the Company’s Class A common stock on the trading day prior to each of the foregoing grant dates.

On November 10, 2016, Mr. Dalton exercised a stock option with respect to 7,534 shares of Class A common stock at an exercise price of $8.87 per share.

On January 31, 2017, under our policy, the Compensation Committee granted exchange rights with respect to rights available to Mr. Lutnick with respect to some of his of his non-exchangeable PSUs/PPSUs. Mr. Lutnick elected to waive such rights as a one-time waiver that is not cumulative. Also pursuant to the policy, the Compensation Committee further approved a grant of 325,000 non-exchangeable PSUs to Mr. Lutnick, in replacement of 325,000 of his NPSUs, and a grant of 1,661,600 non-exchangeable PSUs in replacement of his 1,661,600 non-exchangeable PPSUs, for an aggregate total of 1,986,600 non-exchangeable PSUs, effective as of January 1, 2017, which were all of the rights available to him at such time.

On the same date, the Compensation Committee approved the redemption for cash of 46,469 of Mr. Windeatt’s non-exchangeable LPUs at $10.87 per unit based on the average proceeds of the sale of shares under our Controlled Equity Offering less 2%, for an aggregate of $505,322, 14,866 non-exchangeable PLPUs were redeemed at a determination price of $6.51 per PLPU, for an aggregate of $96,778, and 3,206 non-exchangeable PLPUs were redeemed at a determination price of $7.83 per unit, for an aggregate of $25,103. In connection with these transactions, 2,902 non-exchangeable LPUs, 782 non-exchangeable PLPUs with a determination price of $6.51, and 347 non-exchangeable PLPUs with a determination price of $7.38 were redeemed for zero.

On December 14, 2016, Mr. Lynn entered into an amended and restated deed of adherence (the “New Lynn Deed”) with BGC Services (Holdings) LLP (the “U.K. Partnership”). The Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors approved the New Lynn Deed and a related letter agreement, dated December 14, 2016 (the “Letter Agreement”), providing for a grant to Mr. Lynn of 1,000,000 NPSUs and 3,500,000 LPUs in BGC Holdings, L.P. (the “Partnership”), effective as of October 1, 2016.

The New Lynn Deed provides for substantially similar terms to the amended and restated deed of adherence to the limited liability partnership agreement (the “LLP Agreement”) of the U.K. Partnership entered into by Mr. Lynn effective as of January 7, 2013 (as then amended and restated, the “Old Lynn Deed”), except that (i) the 52-week rolling notice period has been replaced with a fixed term contract expiring March 31, 2023, with a 24-month advance rolling notice period; (ii) the term of the restrictive covenants in the Old Lynn Deed has been extended from 18 months to two years; (iii) the profit allocation payable to Mr. Lynn in the event of a termination due to illness or injury will be based on a pro rata portion of the profit allocation for the prior year; and (iv) the profit allocation payable in the event of the death of Mr. Lynn will be payable to his estate all in cash, with the Compensation Committee taking into consideration the portion of the year served and the profit allocation which might have paid to Mr. Lynn in the event that he had survived.

Further, on or about each October 1 of 2017 through 2020, pursuant to the Letter Agreement, the Partnership shall grant an aggregate award of 250,000 non-exchangeable LPUs in replacement of 250,000 of the above-referenced NPSUs, provided that (i) the Company, inclusive of all affiliates thereof, earns, in the aggregate, at least $5 million in gross revenues in the calendar quarter in respect of which the applicable award of LPUs is to be granted, and (ii) except in the event of Mr. Lynn’s death prior to the applicable grant date, Mr. Lynn remains a member in the U.K. Partnership and has complied at all times with the New Lynn Deed and the Agreement of Limited Partnership of BGC Holdings, L.P., Amended and Restated as of March 31, 2008 (as further amended from time to time, the “Partnership Agreement”), as of the applicable grant date. The LPUs shall be subject to customary adjustments due to membership in the U.K. Partnership upon their exchange or redemption (e.g., 9.75% cancellation/forfeiture upon exchange).

In the event of a change of control of the U.K. Partnership at any time while Mr. Lynn is providing substantial services to the Company or an affiliate thereof (the date such event takes effect, the “Change in Control”), then the Partnership shall grant exchangeable LPUs in replacement of any of the above NPSUs then held by Mr. Lynn, and any of the above non-exchangeable LPUs then held by Mr. Lynn shall become exchangeable for shares of the Company’s Class A common stock as follows: (a) in a lump sum following (i) the third anniversary of the Change of Control if Mr. Lynn continuously provides substantial services (as an employee, member, partner, consultant, or otherwise) to the Company, any of the individual(s) or entity(ies) which acquire(s) control of the Company (the “Controller”), or any affiliate thereof for the three years after the Change of Control, or (ii) the date the Controller permanently terminates Mr. Lynn’s services in all capacities to the Company, the Controller, and all affiliates thereof prior to the third anniversary of the Change of Control if the circumstances amount to a fundamental breach of contract by the Controller as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, or (b) ratably on or about the first through third anniversaries following the Change of Control if the Controller permanently terminates Mr. Lynn’s services in all capacities to the Company, the Controller, and all affiliates thereof prior to the third anniversary of the Change of Control unless (a)(ii) above applies. These rights are subject to compliance by Mr. Lynn with certain terms and conditions set forth in the applicable agreements, including not engaging in Competitive Activity (as such term is defined under the Partnership Agreement) at any time prior to the applicable grant of exchangeability. The grant of exchangeability with respect to such LPUs will be determined in accordance with the Company’s practices when determining discretionary bonuses or awards, and any grants of exchangeability shall be subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee.

In addition, the Compensation Committee approved a separate consultancy agreement between Mr. Lynn and the U.K. Partnership dated December 14, 2016, under which Mr. Lynn will be paid a fee of $20,833.33 per month ($250,000 per year) for his services, commencing upon the termination of his membership in the U.K. Partnership until the earlier of five years following such termination or such time as the U.K. Partnership chooses to terminate the engagement (the “Consultancy Agreement”). The Consultancy Agreement subjects Mr. Lynn to substantially the same two-year restrictive covenants as in the New Lynn Deed subsequent to his consultancy termination.

On January 31, 2017, the Compensation Committee approved the acceleration of the lapse of restrictions on transferability with respect to 167,654 shares of restricted stock held by Mr. Lynn and the Company repurchased the shares from Mr. Lynn at $11.07 per share, the closing price of the Company’s Class A common stock on such date. In connection with such transaction, 25,156 of Mr. Lynn’s LPUs were redeemed for zero. In addition, the Company redeemed for cash 180,115 of Mr. Lynn’s LPUs at $10.87 per share

based on the net proceeds of the sale of shares under our Controlled Equity Offering less 2%, or $1,958,641, and 70,045 PLPUs redeemed at the grant price of $6.51 per PLPU. In connection with the transactions, 9,480 LPUs and 3,687 PLPUs issued at the grant price of $6.51 were redeemed for zero. These transactions were included in the Company’s stock and unit repurchase authorization and were approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

On January 31, 2017, the Compensation Committee approved the redemption for cash of 46,469 of Mr. Windeatt’s LPUs at $10.87 per share based on the net proceeds of the sale of shares under our Controlled Equity Offering less 2%, or $505,322, 14,866 PLPUs were redeemed at the grant price of $6.51 per PLPU and 3,206 PLPUs were redeemed at the grant price of $7.83 per PLPU. In connection with the transactions, 2,902 LPUs, 782 PLPUs issued at the grant price of $6.51 and 347 PLPUs issued at the grant price of $7.38 were redeemed for zero. These transactions were included in the Company’s stock and unit repurchase authorization and were approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

On February 24, 2017, Sean A. Windeatt, the Chief Operating Officer of BGC Partners, Inc. (the “Company”), entered into a deed of an amendment (the “Windeatt Amendment”) with BGC Services (Holdings) LLP (the “U.K. Partnership”). The Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Windeatt Amendment and a related letter agreement, dated February 24, 2017 (the “Letter Agreement”), providing for a grant to Mr. Windeatt of 400,000 NPSUs and 100,000 LPUs in BGC Holdings, L.P. (the “Partnership”), effective as of January 1, 2017.

The Windeatt Amendment provides for substantially similar terms to the amended and restated deed of adherence to the limited liability partnership agreement (the “LLP Agreement”) of the U.K. Partnership entered into by Mr. Windeatt effective as of January 22, 2014 (as then amended and restated, the “Windeatt Deed”), except that (i) the current term of the Windeatt Deed has been extended from December 31, 2018 to March 31, 2024, with a 12-month advance rolling notice period; and (ii) the term of the restrictive covenants in the Windeatt Deed has been replaced with a two year period.

Further, on or about each April 1 of 2018 through 2021, pursuant to the Letter Agreement, the Partnership shall grant an aggregate award of 100,000 non-exchangeable LPUs in replacement of 100,000 of the above-referenced NPSUs, provided that (i) the Company, inclusive of all affiliates thereof, earns, in aggregate, at least $5 million in gross revenues in the calendar quarter in respect of which the applicable award of LPUs is to be granted, and (ii) except in the event of Mr. Windeatt’s death prior to the applicable grant date, Mr. Windeatt remains a member in the U.K. Partnership and has complied at all times with the Windeatt Deed (as amended) and the Agreement of Limited Partnership of BGC Holdings, L.P. Amended and Restated as of March 31, 2008 (as further amended from time to time, the “Partnership Agreement”), as of the applicable grant date. The LPUs shall be subject to customary adjustments due to membership in the U.K. Partnership upon their exchange or redemption (e.g., 9.75% cancellation/forfeiture upon exchange).

In the event of a change of control of the U.K. Partnership at any time while Mr. Windeatt is providing substantial services to the Company or an affiliate thereof (the date such event takes effect, the “Change in Control”), then the Partnership shall grant exchangeable LPUs in replacement of any of the above NPSUs then held by Mr. Windeatt, and any of the above non-exchangeable LPUs then held by Mr. Windeatt shall become exchangeable for shares of the Company’s Class A common stock as follows: (a) in a lump sum following the third anniversary of the Change of Control if Mr. Windeatt continuously provides substantial services (as an employee, member, partner, consultant or otherwise) to the Company, any of the individual(s) or entity(ies) which acquire(s) control of the Company (the “Controller”), or any affiliate thereof for the three years after the Change of Control, or (b) ratably on or about the first through third anniversaries following the Change of Control if the Controller permanently terminates Mr. Windeatt’s services in all capacities to the Company, the Controller, and all affiliates thereof prior to the third anniversary of the Change of Control (provided that, in the event of a termination between the first and third anniversaries of the Change of Control, the portion of the payment attributed to the anniversary(ies) that passed prior to such termination shall be delivered in a lump sum following such termination, with the outstanding portion to be delivered in accordance with the remaining anniversary(ies)). These rights are subject to compliance by Mr. Windeatt of certain terms and conditions set forth in the applicable agreements, including not engaging in Competitive Activity (as such term is defined under the Partnership Agreement) at any time prior to the applicable grant of exchangeability. The grant of exchangeability with respect to such LPUs will be determined in accordance with the Company’s practices when determining discretionary bonuses or awards, and any grants of exchangeability shall be subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee.

In addition, the Compensation Committee approved a separate consultancy agreement between Mr. Windeatt and the U.K. Partnership dated February 24, 2017, under which Mr. Windeatt will be paid a fee of £8,333.33 per month (£100,000 per year) for his services, commencing upon the termination of his membership in the U.K. Partnership until the earlier of two years following such termination or such time as the U.K. Partnership chooses to terminate the engagement (the “Consultancy Agreement”). The Consultancy Agreement subjects Mr. Windeatt to substantially the same two-year restrictive covenants as in the Windeatt Deed subsequent to his consultancy termination.

On June 6, 2017, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company, the Company’s stockholders approved the Company’s Second Amended and Restated Incentive Bonus Compensation Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) to approve the material terms of the

performance goals under the Incentive Plan for compliance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, including an amendment to those performance goals in order to broaden the stock price performance goal to include dividends and/or total stockholder return.

The following table provides certain volume and transaction count information for the quarterly periods indicated:

Fully electronic volume, including new products, was $4.6 trillion for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to $4.2 trillion for the three months ended September 30, 2016. Our hybrid volume for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was $61.9 trillion, compared to $53.2 trillion for the three months ended September 30, 2016.

The following table summarizes certain of our contractual obligations at September 30, 2017 (in thousands):

⁵ Short-term borrowings reflects approximately $6.3 million (BRL 20.0 million) of borrowings under the Company’s committed unsecured loan agreement. See Note 21— “Long-term Debt, Collateralized and Short-term Borrowings,” for more information regarding this obligation.

In the ordinary course of business, we enter into arrangements with unconsolidated entities, including variable interest entities. See Note 18—“Investments” to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information related to our investments in unconsolidated entities.

The preparation of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of the assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. We believe that of our significant accounting policies (see Note 3—“Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K and Note 3— “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q), the following policies involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.

We derive our revenues primarily through commissions from brokerage services; the spread between the buy and sell prices on matched principal transactions; gains from mortgage banking activities; revenues from real estate management and other services; servicing fees; fees from related parties; data, software and post-trade services; and other revenues.

The judgments involved in revenue recognition include determining the appropriate time to recognize revenue. In particular within our Real Estate Services segment, we evaluate our transactions to determine whether contingencies exist that may impact the timing of revenue recognition.

Discretionary Bonus: A portion of our compensation and employee benefits expense is comprised of discretionary bonuses, which may be paid in cash, equity, partnership awards or a combination thereof. We accrue expense in a period based on revenues in that period and on the expected combination of cash, equity and partnership units. Given the assumptions used in estimating discretionary bonuses, actual results may differ.

Restricted Stock Units: We account for equity-based compensation under the fair value recognition provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance. Restricted stock units (“RSUs”) provided to certain employees are accounted for as equity awards, and as per FASB guidance, we are required to record an expense for the portion of the RSUs that is ultimately expected to vest. FASB guidance requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Because significant assumptions are used in estimating employee turnover and associated forfeiture rates, actual results may differ from our estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The fair value of RSU awards to employees is determined on the date of grant, based on the market value of our Class A common stock. Generally, RSUs granted by us as employee compensation do not receive dividend equivalents; as such, we adjust the fair value of the RSUs for the present value of expected forgone dividends, which requires us to include an estimate of expected dividends as a valuation input. This grant-date fair value is amortized to expense ratably over the awards’ vesting periods. For RSUs with graded vesting features, we have made an accounting policy election to recognize compensation cost on a straight-line basis. The amortization is reflected as non-cash equity-based compensation expense in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Restricted Stock: Restricted stock provided to certain employees is accounted for as an equity award, and as per FASB guidance, we are required to record an expense for the portion of the restricted stock that is ultimately expected to vest. We have granted restricted stock that is not subject to continued employment or service; however, transferability is subject to compliance with our and our affiliates’ customary noncompete obligations. Such shares of restricted stock are generally saleable by partners in five to ten years. Because the restricted stock is not subject to continued employment or service, the grant-date fair value of the restricted stock is expensed on the date of grant. The expense is reflected as non-cash equity-based compensation expense in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Limited Partnership Units: Limited partnership units in BGC Holdings are generally held by employees. Generally, such units receive quarterly allocations of net income, which are cash distributed on a quarterly basis and generally contingent upon services being provided by the unit holders. Our Preferred Units are not entitled to participate in partnership distributions other than with respect to a distribution at a rate of either 0.6875% (which is 2.75% per calendar year) or such other amount as set forth in the award documentation. As prescribed in FASB guidance, the quarterly allocations of net income to such limited partnership units are reflected as a component of compensation expense under “Allocations of net income and grants of exchangeability to limited partnership units and FPUs” in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Certain of these limited partnership units entitle the holders to receive post-termination payments equal to the notional amount in four equal yearly installments after the holder’s termination. These limited partnership units are accounted for as post-termination liability awards under FASB guidance. Accordingly, we recognize a liability for these units on our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition as part of “Accrued compensation” for the amortized portion of the post-termination payment amount, based on the current fair value of the expected future cash payout. We amortize the post-termination payment amount, less an expected forfeiture rate, over the vesting period, and record an expense for such awards based on the change in value at each reporting period in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations as part of “Compensation and employee benefits.”

Certain limited partnership units are granted exchangeability into Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis (subject to adjustment). At the time exchangeability is granted, we recognize an expense based on the fair value of the award on that date, which is included in “Allocations of net income and grants of exchangeability to limited partnership units and FPUs” in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. During the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, we incurred compensation expense of $19.8 million and $34.3 million, respectively, related to the grant of exchangeability on partnership units. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, we incurred compensation expense of $111.9 million and $92.7 million, respectively, related to the grant of exchangeability on partnership units.

Employee Loans: We have entered into various agreements with certain of our employees and partners whereby these individuals receive loans that may be either wholly or in part repaid from distributions that the individuals receive on some or all of their limited partnership interests or may be forgiven over a period of time. Cash advance distribution loans are documented in formal agreements and are repayable in timeframes outlined in the underlying agreements. We intend for these advances to be repaid in full from the future distributions on existing and future awards granted. The distributions are treated as compensation expense when made and the proceeds are used to repay the loan. The forgivable portion of any loans is recognized as compensation expense in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations over the life of the loan. We review the loan balances each reporting period for collectability. If we determine that the collectability of a portion of the loan balances is not expected, we recognize a reserve against the loan balances. Actual collectability of loan balances may differ from our estimates.

loans for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $26.0 million and $24.2 million, respectively. Compensation expense for the above-mentioned employee loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $43.2 million and $46.0 million, respectively. The compensation expense related to these loans was included as part of “Compensation and employee benefits” in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in a business combination. As prescribed in FASB guidance, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is not amortized, but instead is periodically tested for impairment. We review goodwill for impairment on an annual basis during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year or whenever an event occurs or circumstances change that could reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.

When reviewing goodwill for impairment, we first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the results of the qualitative assessment are not conclusive, or if we choose to bypass the qualitative assessment, we perform a goodwill impairment analysis using a two-step process.

The first step involves comparing each reporting unit’s estimated fair value with its carrying value, including goodwill. To estimate the fair value of the reporting units, we use a discounted cash flow model and data regarding market comparables. The valuation process requires significant judgment and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. These assumptions include cash flow projections, estimated cost of capital and the selection of peer companies and relevant multiples. Because significant assumptions and estimates are used in projecting future cash flows, choosing peer companies and selecting relevant multiples, actual results may differ from our estimates under different assumptions or conditions. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is deemed not to be impaired. If the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value, there is an indication of potential impairment and the second step is performed to measure the amount of potential impairment.

The second step of the process involves the calculation of an implied fair value of goodwill for each reporting unit for which step one indicated a potential impairment may exist. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by measuring the excess of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit as calculated in step one, over the estimated fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and identified intangibles. Events such as economic weakness, significant declines in operating results of reporting units, or significant changes to critical inputs of the goodwill impairment test (e.g., estimates of cash flows or cost of capital) could cause the estimated fair value of our reporting units to decline, which could result in an impairment of goodwill in the future.

We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method as prescribed in FASB guidance on Accounting for Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to basis differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Certain of our entities are taxed as U.S. partnerships and are subject to the Unincorporated Business Tax (“UBT”) in the City of New York. Therefore, the tax liability or benefit related to the partnership income or loss except for UBT rests with the partners (see Note 2—“Limited Partnership Interests in BGC Holdings” for a discussion of partnership interests), rather than the partnership entity. As such, the partners’ tax liability or benefit is not reflected in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The tax-related assets, liabilities, provisions or benefits included in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements also reflect the results of the entities that are taxed as corporations, either in the U.S. or in foreign jurisdictions. Pursuant to FASB guidance on Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement on Accounting for Income Taxes, we provide for uncertain tax positions based upon management’s assessment of whether a tax benefit is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. Management is required to determine whether a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. Because significant assumptions are used in determining whether a tax benefit is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities, actual results may differ from our estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in “Interest expense” and “Other expenses,” respectively, in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if it is deemed more likely than not that those assets will not be realized. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we consider all available evidence, including past operating results, the existence of cumulative losses in the most recent fiscal years, estimates of future taxable income and the feasibility of tax planning strategies.

The measurement of current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities is based on provisions of enacted tax laws and involves uncertainties in the application of tax regulations in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions. Because our interpretation of

complex tax law may impact the measurement of current and deferred income taxes, actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions regarding the application of tax law.

See Note 3—“Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding our significant accounting policies.

See Note 1—“Organization and Basis of Presentation,” to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for information regarding recent accounting pronouncements.

As of September 30, 2017, there were 252,261,090 shares of our Class A common stock outstanding, of which 14,676,743 shares were held by Cantor and CFGM, Cantor’s managing general partner. On June 21, 2017, Cantor pledged 10,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock in connection with a partner loan program. Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote on matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders.

In addition, as of September 30, 2017, Cantor and CFGM held 34,848,107 shares of our Class B common stock (which represents all of the outstanding shares of our Class B common stock), representing, together with our Class A common stock held by Cantor and CFGM, approximately 60.5% of our voting power on such date. Each share of Class B common stock is generally entitled to the same rights as a share of Class A common stock, except that, on matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders, each share of Class B common stock is entitled to ten votes. The Class B common stock generally votes together with the Class A common stock on all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders.

Through September 30, 2017, Cantor has distributed to its current and former partners an aggregate of 20,793,939 shares of Class A common stock, consisting of (i) 19,338,660 shares to satisfy certain of Cantor’s deferred stock distribution obligations provided to such partners on April 1, 2008 (the “April 2008 distribution rights shares”), and (ii) 1,455,279 shares to satisfy certain of Cantor’s deferred stock distribution obligations provided to such partners on February 14, 2012 in connection with Cantor’s payment of previous quarterly partnership distributions (the “February 2012 distribution rights shares”). As of September 30, 2017, Cantor is still obligated to distribute to its current and former partners an aggregate of 15,813,032 shares of Class A common stock, consisting of 14,033,084 April 2008 distribution rights shares and 1,779,948 February 2012 distribution rights shares.

From time to time, we may actively continue to repurchase shares of our Class A common stock, including from Cantor, our executive officers, other employees, partners and others.

We are a holding company, and our business is operated through two operating partnerships, BGC U.S., which holds our U.S. businesses, and BGC Global, which holds our non-U.S. businesses. The limited partnership interests of the two operating partnerships are held by us and BGC Holdings, and the limited partnership interests of BGC Holdings are currently held by limited partnership unit holders, founding partners, and Cantor. We hold the BGC Holdings general partnership interest and the BGC Holdings special voting limited partnership interest, which entitle us to remove and appoint the general partner of BGC Holdings, and serve as the general partner of BGC Holdings, which entitles us to control BGC Holdings. BGC Holdings, in turn, holds the BGC U.S. general partnership interest and the BGC U.S. special voting limited partnership interest, which entitle the holder thereof to remove and appoint the general partner of BGC U.S., and the BGC Global general partnership interest and the BGC Global special voting limited partnership interest, which entitle the holder thereof to remove and appoint the general partner of BGC Global, and serves as the general partner of BGC U.S. and BGC Global, all of which entitle BGC Holdings (and thereby us) to control each of BGC U.S. and BGC Global. BGC Holdings holds its BGC Global general partnership interest through a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands, BGC Global Holdings GP Limited.

As of September 30, 2017, we held directly and indirectly, through wholly owned subsidiaries, BGC U.S. limited partnership interests and BGC Global limited partnership interests consisting of 287,109,197 units and 287,109,197 units, representing approximately 63.6% and 63.6% of the outstanding BGC U.S. limited partnership interests and BGC Global limited partnership interests, respectively. As of that date, BGC Holdings held BGC U.S. limited partnership interests and BGC Global limited partnership interests consisting of 164,587,301 units and 164,587,301 units, representing approximately 36.4% and 36.4% of the outstanding BGC U.S. limited partnership interests and BGC Global limited partnership interests, respectively.

Limited partnership unit holders, founding partners, and Cantor directly hold BGC Holdings limited partnership interests. Since BGC Holdings in turn holds BGC U.S. limited partnership interests and BGC Global limited partnership interests, limited partnership unit holders, founding partners, and Cantor indirectly have interests in BGC U.S. limited partnership interests and BGC Global limited partnership interests.

As of September 30, 2017, excluding Preferred Units and NPSUs described below, outstanding BGC Holdings partnership interests included 99,919,001 limited partnership units, 13,485,124 founding partner units and 51,183,176 Cantor units.

We may in the future effect additional redemptions of BGC Holdings limited partnership units and founding partner units for shares of our Class A common stock. We may also continue our earlier partnership restructuring programs, whereby we redeemed or repurchased certain limited partnership units and founding partner units in exchange for new units, grants of exchangeability for Class A common stock or cash and, in many cases, obtained modifications or extensions of partners’ employment arrangements. We also generally expect to continue to grant exchange rights with respect to outstanding non-exchangeable limited partnership units and founding partner units, and to repurchase BGC Holdings partnership interests from time to time, including from Cantor, our executive officers, and other employees and partners, unrelated to our partnership restructuring programs.

Cantor units are generally exchangeable with us for up to 34,649,693 shares of our Class B common stock (or, at Cantor’s option or if there are no such additional authorized but unissued shares of our Class B common stock, our Class A common stock) on a one-for-one basis (subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments). Upon certain circumstances, Cantor may have the right to acquire additional Cantor units in connection with the redemption of or grant of exchangeability to certain non-exchangeable founding partner units owned by persons who were previously Cantor partners prior to the separation. On November 4, 2015, the Company issued exchange rights with respect to, and Cantor purchased, in transactions exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, an aggregate of 1,775,481 exchangeable limited partnership units in BGC Holdings, as follows: In connection with the redemption by BGC Holdings of an aggregate of 588,356 non-exchangeable founding partner units from founding partners of BGC Holdings for an aggregate consideration of $2,296,801, Cantor purchased 554,196 exchangeable limited partnership units from BGC Holdings for an aggregate of $2,115,306 (after offset of a founding partner’s $46,289 debt due to Cantor). In addition, pursuant to the Sixth Amendment, on November 4, 2015, Cantor purchased 1,221,285 exchangeable limited partnership units from BGC Holdings for an aggregate consideration of $4,457,436 in connection with the grant of exchangeability and exchange of 1,221,285 founding partner units. Exchangeable limited partnership units held by Cantor are exchangeable by Cantor at any time on a one-for-one basis (subject to adjustment) for shares of Class A common stock of the Company.

On November 6, 2013, BGC GP, LLC, a subsidiary of the Company and the General Partner of the Company’s majority-owned subsidiary, BGC Holdings, and Cantor, the Majority in Interest Exchangeable Limited Partner of the Partnership, entered into the Ninth Amendment to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Partnership (the “Ninth Amendment”) effective as of July 1, 2013.

In order to facilitate partner compensation and for other corporate purposes, the Ninth Amendment created new preferred partnership units (“Preferred Units”), which are working partner units that may be awarded to holders of, or contemporaneous with the grant of, PSUs, PSIs, PSEs, LPUs, APSUs, APSIs, APSEs, REUs, RPUs, AREUs, and ARPUs. These new Preferred Units carry the same name as the underlying unit, with the insertion of an additional “P” to designate them as Preferred Units.

Such Preferred Units may not be made exchangeable into our Class A common stock and accordingly will not be included in the fully diluted share count. Each quarter, the net profits of BGC Holdings are allocated to such Units at a rate of either 0.6875% (which is 2.75% per calendar year) of the allocation amount assigned to them based on their award price, or such other amount as set forth in the award documentation (the “Preferred Distribution”), before calculation and distribution of the quarterly Partnership distribution for the remaining Partnership units. The Preferred Units will not be entitled to participate in Partnership distributions other than with respect to the Preferred Distribution. As of September 30, 2017, there were 17,260,676 such units granted and outstanding. The Ninth Amendment was approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and by the full Board.

On May 9, 2014, partners of BGC Holdings approved the Tenth Amendment to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of BGC Holdings effective as of May 9, 2014. In order to facilitate partner compensation and for other corporate purposes the Tenth Amendment created a new class of partnership units (NPSUs), which are working partner units. For more information, see Note 17—“Related Party Transactions” to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

On June 5, 2015, we entered into an agreement with Cantor providing Cantor, CFGM and other Cantor affiliates entitled to hold Class B common stock the right to exchange from time to time, on a one-to-one basis, subject to adjustment, up to an aggregate of 34,649,693 shares of Class A common stock now owned or subsequently acquired by such Cantor entities for up to an aggregate of

34,649,693 shares of Class B common stock. Such shares of Class B common stock, which currently can be acquired upon the exchange of exchangeable limited partnership units owned in BGC Holdings, are already included in the Company’s fully diluted share count and will not increase Cantor’s current maximum potential voting power in the common equity. The exchange agreement will enable the Cantor entities to acquire the same number of shares of Class B common stock that they are already entitled to acquire without having to exchange their exchangeable limited partnership units in BGC Holdings. The Company’s Audit Committee and full Board of Directors determined that it was in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to approve the exchange agreement because it will help ensure that Cantor retains its exchangeable limited partnership units in BGC Holdings, which is the same partnership in which the Company’s partner employees participate, thus continuing to align the interests of Cantor with those of the partner employees.

We and Cantor have agreed that any shares of Class B common stock issued in connection with the exchange agreement would be deducted from the aggregate number of shares of Class B common stock that may be issued to the Cantor entities upon exchange of exchangeable limited partnership units in BGC Holdings. Accordingly, the Cantor entities will not be entitled to receive any more shares of Class B common stock under this agreement than they were previously eligible to receive upon exchange of exchangeable limited partnership units.

On November 4, 2015, partners of BGC Holdings approved the Eleventh Amendment to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of BGC Holdings (the “Eleventh Amendment”) effective as of October 1, 2015. In order to facilitate partner compensation and for other corporate purposes, the Eleventh Amendment created five new classes of non-distributing partnership units. These new N Units carry the same name as the underlying unit with the insertion of an additional “N” to designate them as the N Unit type and are designated as NREUs, NPREUs, NLPUs, NPLPUs and NPPSUs. The N Units are not entitled to participate in Partnership distributions, will not be allocated any items of profit or loss and may not be made exchangeable into shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. Subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee or its designee, certain N Units may be converted into the underlying unit type (i.e. an NREU will be converted into an REU) and will then participate in Partnership distributions, subject to terms and conditions determined by the general partner of BGC Holdings in its sole discretion, including that the recipient continue to provide substantial services to the Company and comply with his or her partnership obligations. The Eleventh Amendment was approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and by the full Board of Directors.

On December 14, 2016, partners of BGC Holdings approved the Twelfth Amendment to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of BGC Holdings (the “Twelfth Amendment”), effective as of October 1, 2016. The Twelfth Amendment was entered into to amend certain terms and conditions of the N Units in order to provide flexibility to the Company and the Partnership in using such N Units in connection with compensation arrangements and practices. The Twelfth Amendment provides for a minimum $5 million gross revenue requirement in a given quarter as a condition for an N Unit to be replaced by another type of Partnership unit in accordance with the Partnership Agreement and the award documentation. The Amendment was approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.

The following diagram illustrates our organizational structure as of September 30, 2017. The diagram does not reflect the various subsidiaries of BGC, BGC U.S., BGC Global, BGC Holdings or Cantor, or the noncontrolling interests in our consolidated subsidiaries other than Cantor’s units in BGC Holdings.*

The diagram reflects Class A common stock and BGC Holdings partnership unit activity from January 1, 2017 through September 30, 2017 as follows: (a) an aggregate of 23,829,606 limited partnership units granted by BGC Holdings; (b) 5,414,160 shares of Class A common stock sold by us under the November 2014 Sales Agreement pursuant to our Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-200415), but not the 542,819 shares remaining for sale by us under such sales agreement; (c) 1,246,365 shares of Class A common stock repurchased by us; (d) 2,066,724 forfeited limited partnership units; (e) 479,313 shares of Class A common stock issued for vested restricted stock units; (f) 947,301 shares issued by us under our acquisition shelf Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-169232), but not the 9,451,384 shares remaining available for issuance by us under such Registration Statement; (g) 1,097,795 limited partnership and founding partner units redeemed or repurchased by us for cash; (h) 45,490 shares issued by us under our Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-173109), but not the 9,671,693 shares remaining available for issuance by us under shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-196999); (i) 152,117 shares sold by selling stockholders under our resale shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-175034), but not the 994,573 shares remaining available for sale by selling stockholders under such Registration Statement; and (j) 25,327 shares sold by selling stockholders under our resale shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-167953), but not the 144,945 shares remaining available for sale by selling stockholders under such Registration Statement.

Credit risk arises from potential non-performance by counterparties and customers. BGC Partners has established policies and procedures to manage its exposure to credit risk. BGC Partners maintains a thorough credit approval process to limit exposure to counterparty risk and employs stringent monitoring to control the counterparty risk from its matched principal and agency businesses. BGC Partners’ account opening and counterparty approval process includes verification of key customer identification, anti-money laundering verification checks and a credit review of financial and operating data. The credit review process includes establishing an internal credit rating and any other information deemed necessary to make an informed credit decision, which may include correspondence, due diligence calls and a visit to the entity’s premises, as necessary.

Credit approval is granted subject to certain trading limits and may be subject to additional conditions, such as the receipt of collateral or other credit support. Ongoing credit monitoring procedures include reviewing periodic financial statements and publicly available information on the client and collecting data from credit rating agencies, where available, to assess the ongoing financial condition of the client.

Through its subsidiaries, BGC Partners executes matched principal transactions in which it acts as a “middleman” by serving as counterparty to both a buyer and a seller in matching back-to-back trades. These transactions are then settled through a recognized settlement system or third-party clearing organization. Settlement typically occurs within one to three business days after the trade date. Cash settlement of the transaction occurs upon receipt or delivery of the underlying instrument that was traded. BGC Partners generally avoids settlement of principal transactions on a free-of-payment basis or by physical delivery of the underlying instrument. However, free-of-payment transactions may occur on a very limited basis.

The number of matched principal trades BGC Partners executes has continued to grow as compared to prior years. Receivables from broker-dealers, clearing organizations, customers and related broker-dealers and Payables to broker-dealers, clearing organizations, customers and related broker-dealers on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition primarily represent the simultaneous purchase and sale of the securities associated with those matched principal transactions that have not settled as of their stated settlement dates. BGC Partners’ experience has been that substantially all of these transactions ultimately settle at the contracted amounts.

In addition, BGC Partners incurs limited credit risk related to certain brokerage activities. The counterparty risk relates to the collectability of the outstanding brokerage fee receivables. The review process includes monitoring both the clients and the related

brokerage receivables. The review includes an evaluation of the ongoing collection process and an aging analysis of the brokerage receivables.

Berkeley Point, under the Fannie Mae DUS program, originates and services multifamily loans for Fannie Mae without having to obtain Fannie Mae’s prior approval for certain loans, as long as the loans meet the underwriting guidelines set forth by Fannie Mae. In return for the delegated authority to make loans and the commitment to purchase loans by Fannie Mae, we must maintain minimum collateral and generally are required to share risk of loss on loans sold through Fannie Mae. With respect to most loans, we are generally required to absorb approximately one-third of any losses on the unpaid principal balance of a loan at the time of loss settlement. Some of the loans that we originate under the Fannie Mae DUS program are subject to reduced levels or no risk-sharing. However, we generally receive lower servicing fees with respect to such loans. Although our Berkeley Point business’s average annual losses from such risk-sharing programs have been a minimal percentage of the aggregate principal amount of such loans, if loan defaults increase, actual risk-sharing obligation payments under the Fannie Mae DUS program could increase, and such defaults could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, a material failure to pay its share of losses under the Fannie Mae DUS program could result in the revocation of Berkeley Point’s license from Fannie Mae and the exercise of various remedies available to Fannie Mae under the Fannie Mae DUS program.

Effective July 17, 2017, BGC entered into a joint venture with Cantor Commercial Real Estate Investor, L.P., an affiliate of Cantor Fitzgerald. Investments under this agreement will be real estate related, including investments in debt and equity securities as well as financing of loans for related parties. These activities may expose the firm to credit risk.

Market risk refers to the risk that a change in the level of one or more market prices, rates, indices or other factors will result in losses for a specified position. BGC Partners may allow certain of its desks to enter into unmatched principal transactions in the ordinary course of business and hold long and short inventory positions. These transactions are primarily for the purpose of facilitating clients’ execution needs, adding liquidity to a market or attracting additional order flow. As a result, BGC Partners may have market risk exposure on these transactions. BGC Partners’ exposure varies based on the size of its overall positions, the risk characteristics of the instruments held and the amount of time the positions are held before they are disposed of. BGC Partners has limited ability to track its exposure to market risk and unmatched positions on an intra-day basis; however, it attempts to mitigate its market risk on these positions by strict risk limits, extremely limited holding periods and hedging its exposure. These positions are intended to be held short term to facilitate customer transactions. However, due to a number of factors, including the nature of the position and access to the market on which it trades, BGC Partners may not be able to unwind the position and it may be forced to hold the position for a longer period than anticipated. All positions held longer than intra-day are marked to market.

We also have investments in marketable equity securities, which are publicly-traded, and which had a fair value of $259.4 million as of September 30, 2017. Investments in marketable securities carry a degree of risk, as there can be no assurance that the marketable securities will not lose value and, in general, securities markets can be volatile and unpredictable. As a result of these different market risks, our holdings of marketable securities could be materially and adversely affected. We may seek to minimize the effect of price changes on a portion of our investments in marketable securities through the use of derivative contracts. However, there can be no assurance that our hedging activities will be adequate to protect us against price risks associated with our investments in marketable securities. See Note 9—“Marketable Securities” and Note 12—“Derivatives” to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further information regarding these investments and related hedging activities.

Our risk management procedures and strict limits are designed to monitor and limit the risk of unintended loss and have been effective in the past. However, there is no assurance that these procedures and limits will be effective at limiting unanticipated losses in the future. Adverse movements in the securities positions or a downturn or disruption in the markets for these positions could result in a substantial loss. In addition, principal gains and losses resulting from these positions could on occasion have a disproportionate effect, positive or negative, on BGC Partners’ consolidated financial condition and results of operations for any particular reporting period.

Our businesses are highly dependent on our ability to process a large number of transactions across numerous and diverse markets in many currencies on a daily basis. If any of our data processing systems do not operate properly or are disabled or if there are other shortcomings or failures in our internal processes, people or systems, we could suffer impairment to our liquidity, financial loss, a disruption of our businesses, liability to clients, regulatory intervention or reputational damage. These systems may fail to operate properly or become disabled as a result of events that are wholly or partially beyond our control, including cybersecurity incidents, a disruption of electrical or communications services or our inability to occupy one or more of our buildings. The inability of our systems to accommodate an increasing volume of transactions could also constrain our ability to expand our businesses.

In addition, despite our contingency plans, our ability to conduct business may be adversely impacted by a disruption in the infrastructure that supports our businesses and the communities in which they are located. This may include a disruption involving electrical, communications, transportation or other services used by us or third parties with whom we conduct business.

BGC Partners is exposed to risks associated with changes in foreign exchange rates. Changes in foreign exchange rates create volatility in the U.S. Dollar equivalent of the Company’s revenues and expenses. In addition, changes in the remeasurement of BGC Partners’ foreign currency denominated financial assets and liabilities are recorded as part of its results of operations and fluctuate with changes in foreign currency rates. BGC monitors the net exposure in foreign currencies on a daily basis and hedges its exposure as deemed appropriate with highly rated major financial institutions.

The majority of the Company’s foreign currency exposure is related to the U.S. Dollar versus the British Pound and the Euro. While our international results of operations, as measured in U.S. Dollars, are subject to foreign exchange fluctuations, we do not consider the related risk to be material to our results of operations. For the financial assets and liabilities denominated in the British Pound and Euro, including foreign currency hedge positions related to these currencies, we evaluated the effects of a 10% shift in exchange rates between those currencies and the U.S. Dollar, holding all other assumptions constant. The analysis identified the worst case scenario as the U.S. Dollar weakening against the British Pound and strengthened against the Euro. If as of September 30, 2017, the U.S. Dollar had weakened against the British Pound and strengthened against the Euro by 10%, the currency movements would have had an aggregate negative impact on our net income of approximately $0.4 million.

BGC Partners had $986.7 million in fixed-rate debt outstanding as of September 30, 2017. These debt obligations are not currently subject to fluctuations in interest rates, although in the event of refinancing or issuance of new debt, such debt could be subject to changes in interest rates.

BGC Partners maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by BGC Partners is recorded, processed, accumulated, summarized and communicated to its management, including its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of BGC Partners disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2017. Based on that evaluation, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that BGC Partners’ disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2017.

During the three months ending September 30, 2017, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affect, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

See Note 23—“Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees” to the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which is incorporated by reference herein.

We have debt, which could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations and activities, limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industries, expose us to interest rate risk and prevent us from meeting our obligations under our indebtedness.

Our indebtedness, which at September 30, 2017 was $1,955.8 million, has important consequences, including:

In our Financial Services businesses, we are dependent upon the availability of adequate funding and sufficient regulatory capital and clearing margin. Clearing margin is the amount of cash, guarantees or similar collateral that we must provide or deposit with our third-party clearing organizations in support of our obligations under contractual clearing arrangements with these organizations. Historically, these needs have been satisfied from internally generated funds and proceeds from debt and equity financings. We have also relied on Cantor’s support to clear our transactions in U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agency products under the clearing agreement we entered into with Cantor in November 2008. Although we have historically been able to raise debt on acceptable terms, if for any reason we need to raise additional funds, including in order to meet regulatory capital requirements and/or clearing margin requirements arising from growth in our brokerage businesses, to complete acquisitions or otherwise, we may not be able to obtain additional financing when needed. If we cannot raise additional funds on acceptable terms, we may not be able to develop or enhance our businesses, take advantage of future growth opportunities or respond to competitive pressure or unanticipated requirements.

In our Real Estate Services business, we require a significant amount of short-term funding capacity for loans we originate through Berkeley Point. As of September 30, 2017, Berkeley Point had $950 million of committed loan funding available through three commercial banks and an uncommitted $325 million Fannie Mae loan repurchase facility. Consistent with industry practice, Berkeley Point’s existing warehouse facilities are short-term, requiring annual renewal. If any of the committed facilities are terminated or are not renewed or the uncommitted facility is not honored, we would be required to obtain replacement financing, which we may be unable to find on favorable terms, or at all, and, in such event, we might not be able to originate loans, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

In addition, following the announcement of the Berkeley Point Acquisition, one of our two credit rating outlooks was amended to “negative watch,” which is subject to the successful completion of various capital raising activities. The additional indebtedness that we incur, as well as any changes to our credit ratings and associated outlooks, may restrict our ability to raise additional capital on favorable terms, and such leverage, and any resulting liquidity or credit issues, could have a material adverse effect on our businesses, financial condition, results of operation and prospects.

The loss of relationships with the GSEs and HUD would, and changes in such relationships could, adversely affect our ability to originate commercial real estate loans through such programs. Compliance with the minimum collateral and risk-sharing requirements of such programs, as well as applicable state and local licensing agencies, could reduce our liquidity.

Currently, through Berkeley Point, our Real Estate Services business originates a significant percentage of its loans for sale through the GSEs and HUD programs. Berkeley Point is approved as a Fannie Mae DUS lender, a Freddie Mac Program Plus seller/servicer in 12 states and the District of Columbia, a Freddie Mac Targeted Affordable Housing Seller, a HUD MAP lender nationwide, and a Ginnie Mae issuer. Our status as an approved lender affords us a number of advantages, which may be terminated by the applicable GSE or HUD at any time. Although we intend to take all actions to remain in compliance with the requirements of

these programs, as well as applicable state and local licensing agencies, the loss of such status would, or changes in our relationships with the GSEs and HUD could, prevent us from being able to originate commercial real estate loans for sale through the particular GSE or HUD, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. It could also result in a loss of similar approvals from the GSEs or HUD. As of September 30, 2017, we exceeded the most restrictive applicable net worth requirement of these programs by $368.0 million. In addition, over the last 10 years, Berkeley Point has achieved better than industry average 60 day+ delinquency rates.

We are subject to risk of loss in connection with defaults on loans sold under the Fannie Mae DUS program that could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and liquidity.

Under the Fannie Mae DUS program, our Real Estate Services business originates and services multifamily loans for Fannie Mae without having to obtain Fannie Mae’s prior approval for certain loans, as long as the loans meet the underwriting guidelines set forth by Fannie Mae. In return for the delegated authority to make loans and the commitment to purchase loans by Fannie Mae, we must maintain minimum collateral and generally are required to share risk of loss on loans sold through Fannie Mae. With respect to most loans, we are generally required to absorb approximately one-third of any losses on the unpaid principal balance of a loan at the time of loss settlement. Some of the loans that we originate under the Fannie Mae DUS program are subject to reduced levels or no risk-sharing. However, we generally receive lower servicing fees with respect to such loans. Although our Berkeley Point business’s average annual losses from such risk-sharing programs have been a minimal percentage of the aggregate principal amount of such loans to date, if loan defaults increase, actual risk-sharing obligation payments under the Fannie Mae DUS program could increase, and such defaults could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, a material failure to pay our share of losses under the Fannie Mae DUS program could result in the revocation of Berkeley Point’s license from Fannie Mae and the exercise of various remedies available to Fannie Mae under the Fannie Mae DUS program.

A change to the conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and related actions, along with any changes in laws and regulations affecting the relationship between Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the U.S. federal government or the existence of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Each GSE has been created under a conservatorship established by its regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, since 2008. The conservatorship is a statutory process designed to preserve and conserve the GSEs’ assets and property and put them in a sound and solvent condition. The conservatorships have no specified termination dates. There has been significant uncertainty regarding the future of the GSEs, including how long they will continue to exist in their current forms. Changes in such forms could eliminate or substantially reduce the number of loans we originate with the GSEs. Policymakers and others have focused significant attention in recent years on how to reform the nation’s housing finance system, including what role, if any, the GSEs should play. Such reforms could significantly limit the role of the GSEs in the nation’s housing finance system. Any such reduction in the loans we originate with the GSEs could lead to a reduction in fees related to the loans we originate or service. These effects could cause our Berkeley Point business to realize significantly lower revenues from its loan originations and servicing fees, and ultimately could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Declines in or terminations of servicing engagements or breaches of servicing agreements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We expect that loan servicing fees will continue to constitute a significant portion of our Real Estate Services business’s revenues from the Berkeley Point business for the foreseeable future. Nearly all of these fees are derived from loans that Berkeley Point originates and sells through the agencies’ programs or places with institutional investors. A decline in the number or value of loans that we originate for these investors or terminations of our servicing engagements will decrease these fees. HUD has the right to terminate Berkeley Point’s current servicing engagements for cause. In addition to termination for cause, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac may terminate Berkeley Point’s servicing engagements without cause by paying a termination fee. Institutional investors typically may terminate servicing engagements with Berkeley Point at any time with or without cause, without paying a termination fee. We are also subject to losses that may arise from servicing errors, such as a failure to maintain insurance, pay taxes, or provide notices. If we breach our servicing obligations to the agencies or institutional investors, including as a result of a failure to perform by any third parties to which we have contracted certain routine back-office aspects of loan servicing, the servicing engagements may be terminated. Significant declines or terminations of servicing engagements or breaches of such obligations, in the absence of replacement revenue sources, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Reductions in loan servicing fees as a result of defaults or prepayments by borrowers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

In addition to exposure to potential loss sharing, our Real Estate Services business’s loan servicing business is also subject to potential reductions in loan servicing fees if the borrower defaults on a loan originated thereby, as the generation of loan servicing fees

depends upon the continued receipt and processing of periodic installments of principal, interest and other payments such as amounts held in escrow to pay property taxes and other required expenses. The loss of such loan servicing fees would reduce the amount of cash actually generated from loan servicing and from interest on amounts held in escrow. The expected loss of future loan servicing fees would also result in non-cash impairment charges to earnings. Such cash and non-cash charges could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our Real Estate Services business is subject to the risk of failed loan deliveries, and even after a successful closing and delivery, may be required to repurchase the loan or to indemnify the investor if there is a breach of a representation or warranty made by us in connection with the sale of loans, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

In our Real Estate Services business, we bear the risk that a borrower will not close on a loan that has been pre-sold to an investor and the amount of such borrower’s rate lock deposit and any amounts recoverable from such borrower for breach of its obligations are insufficient to cover the investor’s losses. In addition, the investor may choose not to take delivery of the loan if a catastrophic change in the condition of a property occurs after we fund the loan and prior to the investor purchase date. We also have the risk of errors in loan documentation which prevent timely delivery of the loan prior to the investor purchase date. A complete failure to deliver a loan could be a default under the warehouse line used to finance the loan. No assurance can be given that we will not experience failed deliveries in the future or that any losses will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

We must make certain representations and warranties concerning each loan we originate for the GSEs’ and HUD’s programs or securitizations. The representations and warranties relate to our practices in the origination and servicing of the loans and the accuracy of the information being provided by it. In the event of a material breach of representations or warranties concerning a loan, even if the loan is not in default, investors could, among other things, require us to repurchase the full amount of the loan and seek indemnification for losses from it, or, for Fannie Mae DUS loans, increase the level of risk-sharing on the loan. Our obligation to repurchase the loan is independent of our risk-sharing obligations. Our ability to recover on a claim against the borrower or any other party may be contractually limited and would also be dependent, in part, upon the financial condition and liquidity of such party. Although these obligations have not had a significant impact on our results to date, significant repurchase or indemnification obligations imposed on us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

The information required by this Item is set forth in Note 6— “Stock Transactions and Unit Redemptions” to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Item 2 of Part I) and is incorporated by reference herein.

The information required by this item is set forth in Note 30 — “Subsequent Events,” to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q under the heading “Cantor Purchasing Limited Partnership Interests from BGC Holdings” and in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Item 2 of Part I) under the same heading is incorporated by reference herein.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Delaware	13-4063515
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

499 Park Avenue, New York, NY	10022
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Large accelerated filer	☒		Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☐	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	☐
Emerging growth company	☐

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Consolidated net income (loss)	$	110,548	$	114,303	$	239,395	$	187,475
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		5,134		417		16,186		4,534
Available for sale securities		457		511		1,148		543
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		5,591		928		17,334		5,077
Comprehensive income (loss)		116,139		115,231		256,729		192,552
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries, net of tax		29,845		27,253		70,492		46,889
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	86,294	$	87,978	$	186,237	$	145,663

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Shares outstanding at beginning of period		251,057,086			241,292,033			244,869,624			219,063,365
Share issuances:
Exchanges of limited partnership interests¹		1,434,050			2,947,876			6,795,187			6,269,630
Issuance of Class A common stock for general corporate purposes		—			—			—			1,648,000
Vesting of restricted stock units (RSUs)		42,295			81,873			479,313			569,344
Acquisitions		82,907			125,111			1,424,690			24,854,144
Other issuances of Class A common stock		11,874			250,219			45,490			292,524
Treasury stock repurchases		(295,871	)		(1,341,947	)		(1,246,365	)		(9,326,182	)
Forfeitures of restricted Class A common stock		(71,251	)		(43,657	)		(106,849	)		(59,317	)
Shares outstanding at end of period		252,261,090			243,311,508			252,261,090			243,311,508

Period	Total Number of Units Redeemed or Shares Repurchased		Average Price Paid per Unit or Share		Approximate Dollar Value of Units and Shares That May Yet Be Redeemed/ Purchased Under the Plan
Redemptions^1,2
January 1, 2017—March 31, 2017		2,927,758	$	10.84
April 1, 2017—June 30, 2017		1,908,867	$	11.14
July 1, 2017—September 30, 2017		1,675,330	$	12.58
Total Redemptions		6,511,955	$	11.38
Repurchases^3,4
January 1, 2017—March 31, 2017		552,955	$	11.07
April 1, 2017—June 30, 2017		397,539		11.25
July 1, 2017—July 31, 2017		19,806		12.99
August 1, 2017—August 31, 2017		56,827		12.95
September 1, 2017—September 30, 2017		219,238		13.56
Total Repurchases		1,246,365	$	11.68
Total Redemptions and Repurchases		7,758,320	$	11.43	$	228,572,015

BGC Partners, Inc. – ‘10-Q’ for 9/30/17

On: Wednesday, 11/8/17, at 4:03pm ET · For: 9/30/17 · Accession #: 1564590-17-22716 · File #: 1-35591

Previous ‘10-Q’: ‘10-Q’ on 8/8/17 for 6/30/17 · Next: ‘10-Q’ on 5/10/18 for 3/31/18 · Latest: ‘10-Q’ on 11/9/23 for 9/30/23

Quarterly Report — Form 10-Q — Sect. 13 / 15(d) – SEA’34
Filing Table of Contents

‘10-Q’ — Quarterly Report
Document Table of Contents

This is an HTML Document rendered as filed. [ Alternative Formats ]

Dates Referenced Herein and Documents Incorporated by Reference

		Page
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1	Financial Statements (unaudited)	6

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition—At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016	6

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations—For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016	7

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)—For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016	8

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016	9

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity—For the Year Ended December 31, 2016	12

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity—For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017	13

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	14

ITEM 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	68

ITEM 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	121

ITEM 4	Controls and Procedures	123

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1	Legal Proceedings	124

ITEM 1A	Risk Factors	124

ITEM 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	126

ITEM 3	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	126

ITEM 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	126

ITEM 5	Other Information	126

ITEM 6	Exhibits	127

SIGNATURES		128

			September 30, 2017
	Committed Lines		Uncommitted Lines		Total		Stated Spread to One Month LIBOR	Rate Type
Warehouse line due June 20, 2018¹	$	450,000	$	-	$	241,764	135 bps	Variable
Warehouse line due September 25, 2018		200,000		-		119,779	130 bps	Variable
Warehouse line due October 12, 2017²		300,000		-		274,789	135 bps	Variable
Fannie Mae repurchase agreement, open maturity		-		325,000		23,400	120 bps	Variable
	$	950,000	$	325,000	$	659,732

	September 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
Derivative contract	Assets		Liabilities		Assets		Liabilities
Forwards	$	6,436	$	594	$	17,859	$	36
Rate lock commitments		4,678		863		2,100		9,670
Foreign exchange swaps		3,129		1,740		2,946		977
Foreign exchange/commodities options		1,013		313		244		41
Interest rate swaps		245		—		202		—
Futures		67		442		—		512
Total	$	15,568	$	3,952	$	23,351	$	11,236

	Liabilities at Fair Value at September 30, 2017
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Netting and Collateral			Total
Foreign exchange swaps	$	—	$	2,689	$	—	$	(949	)	$	1,740
Rate lock commitments		—		—		863	—				863
Forwards		—		429		167		(2	)		594
Futures		—		442		—		—			442
Foreign exchange/commodities options		313		—		—		—			313
Contingent consideration		—		—		71,406		—			71,406
Total	$	313	$	3,560	$	72,436	$	(951	)	$	75,358

	Assets at Fair Value at December 31, 2016
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Netting and Collateral			Total
Loans held for sale	$	—	$	1,071,836	$	—	$	—		$	1,071,836
Marketable securities		164,820	—		—		—				164,820
Government debt		35,190		—		—		—			35,190
Securities owned—Equities		167		—		—		—			167
Forwards		—		57		17,824		(22	)		17,859
Foreign exchange swaps		—		3,441		—		(495	)		2,946
Rate lock commitments		—	—			2,100	—				2,100
Foreign exchange/commodities options		244	—		—		—				244
Interest rate swaps		—		202		—		—			202
Total	$	200,421	$	1,075,536	$	19,924	$	(517	)	$	1,295,364

	Liabilities at Fair Value at December 31, 2016
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Netting and Collateral			Total
Rate lock commitments	$	—	$	—	$	9,670	$	—		$	9,670
Foreign exchange swaps		—		1,472		—		(495	)		977
Futures		—		512		—		—			512
Foreign exchange/commodities options		41		—		—		—			41
Forwards		—		58	—			(22	)		36
Contingent consideration		—		—		66,004		—			66,004
Total	$	41	$	2,042	$	75,674	$	(517	)	$	77,240

	Opening Balance as of July 1, 2017		Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in Net income (loss)			Unrealized gains (losses) included in Other comprehensive income (loss)			Issuances		Settlements			Closing Balance at September 30, 2017		Unrealized gains (losses) for Level 3 Assets / Liabilities Outstanding at September 30, 2017
Assets
Rate lock commitments and forwards, net	$	10,566	$	10,070		$	—		$	—	$	(10,566	)	$	10,070	$	10,070
Liabilities
Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities:
Contingent consideration¹	$	69,003	$	(1,959	)	$	(884	)	$	1,262	$	(1,702	)	$	71,406	$	(2,844	)

	Opening Balance as of July 1, 2016		Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in Net income (loss)		Unrealized gains (losses) included in Other comprehensive income (loss)		Issuances		Settlements			Closing Balance at September 30, 2016		Unrealized gains (losses) for Level 3 Assets / Liabilities Outstanding at September 30, 2016
Assets
Rate lock commitments and forwards, net	$	5,115	$	5,182	$	-	$	-	$	(5,115	)	$	5,182	$	5,182
Liabilities
Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities:
Contingent consideration¹	$	72,854	$	16,571	$	53	$	5,631	$	(1,299	)	$	60,562	$	(643	)

	Opening Balance as of January 1, 2017		Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in Net income (loss)			Unrealized gains (losses) included in Other comprehensive income (loss)			Issuances		Settlements			Closing Balance at September 30, 2017		Unrealized gains (losses) for Level 3 Assets / Liabilities Outstanding at September 30, 2017
Assets
Rate lock commitments and forwards, net	$	10,254	$	10,070		$	-		$	-	$	(10,254	)	$	10,070	$	10,070
Liabilities
Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities:
Contingent consideration¹	$	66,004	$	(5,946	)	$	(2,043	)	$	9,624	$	(12,211	)	$	71,406	$	(7,990	)

(in thousands)	September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Equity method investments	$	134,905	$	30,844
Cost method investments		3,088		2,595
Investments	$	137,993	$	33,439

	September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Computer and communications equipment	$	149,896		$	133,470
Software, including software development costs		155,752			130,397
Leasehold improvements and other fixed assets		174,756			154,602
		480,404			418,469
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		(294,800	)		(251,230	)
Fixed assets, net	$	185,604		$	167,239

	Financial Services			Real Estate Services		Total
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	451,035		$	412,846	$	863,881
Acquisitions		29,049			45,273		74,322
Measurement period adjustments		(17,057	)		781		(16,276	)
Cumulative translation adjustment		4,857			—		4,857
Balance at September 30, 2017	$	467,884		$	458,900	$	926,784

	September 30, 2017
	Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Amount		Weighted- Average Remaining Life (Years)
Definite life intangible assets:
Customer-related	$	200,273	$	24,326	$	175,947		14.1
Technology		24,024		8,874		15,150		4.4
Noncompete agreements		31,584		13,817		17,767		2.4
Patents		10,596		9,785		811		3.1
All other		20,360		9,063		11,297		8.6
Total definite life intangible assets		286,837		65,865		220,972		12.2
Indefinite life intangible assets:
Trade names		83,960		—		83,960	N/A
Licenses		7,929		—		7,929	N/A
Total indefinite life intangible assets		91,889		—		91,889	N/A
Total	$	378,726	$	65,865	$	312,861		12.2

2017	$	7.3
2018		27.4
2019		25.8
2020		19.5
2021		17.9
2022 and thereafter		123.1
Total	$	221.0

	September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Unsecured senior revolving credit agreement	$	396,911	$	—
Unsecured senior term loan credit agreement		572,194	—
8.125% Senior Notes		109,365		109,271
5.375% Senior Notes		297,819		297,083
8.375% Senior Notes		243,611		246,988
5.125% Senior Notes		296,797		296,215
Collateralized borrowings		39,110		16,210
Total Long-term debt and collateralized borrowings		1,955,807		965,767
Short-term borrowings		6,313		—
Total Long-term debt, collateralized and short-term borrowings	$	1,962,120	$	965,767

	September 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
8.125% Senior Notes	$	109,365	$	117,000	$	109,271	$	115,650
5.375% Senior Notes		297,819		315,750		297,083		312,000
8.375% Senior Notes		243,611		250,800		246,988		256,650
5.125% Senior Notes		296,797		318,000		296,215		309,300
Total	$	947,592	$	1,001,550	$	949,557	$	993,600

	Number of Units
Balance at December 31, 2016		104,564,656
Granted		30,353,299
Redeemed/exchanged units		(7,484,608	)
Forfeited units		(6,374,750	)
Balance at September 30, 2017		121,058,597

	Restricted Stock Units			Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)
Balance at December 31, 2016		1,547,402		$	6.86		1.63
Granted		755,263			10.37
Delivered units		(706,468	)		6.81
Forfeited units		(136,376	)		8.28
Balance at September 30, 2017		1,459,821		$	8.57		1.81

	Options		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Balance at December 31, 2016		1,007,085	$	10.82		1.0	$	—
Granted		—		—
Exercised options		—		—
Forfeited options		—		—
Balance at September 30, 2017		1,007,085	$	10.82		0.2	$	3,680,040
Options exercisable at September 30, 2017		1,007,085	$	10.82		0.2	$	3,680,040


Balance at December 31, 2015	$	(288	)
Increase to provision		(125	)
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	(413	)
Reversal of provision		347
Balance at September 30, 2017	$	(66	)

BGC Partners, Inc. – ‘10-Q’ for 9/30/17

On: Wednesday, 11/8/17, at 4:03pm ET · For: 9/30/17 · Accession #: 1564590-17-22716 · File #: 1-35591

Previous ‘10-Q’: ‘10-Q’ on 8/8/17 for 6/30/17 · Next: ‘10-Q’ on 5/10/18 for 3/31/18 · Latest: ‘10-Q’ on 11/9/23 for 9/30/23

Quarterly Report — Form 10-Q — Sect. 13 / 15(d) – SEA’34Filing Table of Contents

‘10-Q’ — Quarterly ReportDocument Table of Contents

This is an HTML Document rendered as filed. [ Alternative Formats ]

Dates Referenced Herein and Documents Incorporated by Reference

Quarterly Report — Form 10-Q — Sect. 13 / 15(d) – SEA’34
Filing Table of Contents

‘10-Q’ — Quarterly Report
Document Table of Contents

	September 30		December 31
	2017		2016
Long-lived assets:
United States	$	1,341,119	$	1,284,732
United Kingdom		355,096		229,815
Asia		25,410		22,894
Other Europe/MEA		8,300		4,952
France		7,650		5,540
Other Americas		26,909		22,246
Total long-lived assets	$	1,764,484	$	1,570,179

	Rating	Outlook
Fitch Ratings Inc.¹	BBB-	Stable
Standard & Poor’s²	BBB-	CreditWatch Negative

	September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
(in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	546.0		$	535.6
Reverse repurchase agreements		—			54.7
Repurchase agreements		(1.8	)	—
Securities owned		32.1			35.3
Marketable securities ¹		124.4			164.8
Total	$	700.7		$	790.4

Period	Total Number of Units Redeemed or Shares Repurchased		Average Price Paid per Unit or Share		Approximate Dollar Value of Units and Shares That May Yet Be Redeemed/Purchased Under the Plan
Redemptions^1,2
January 1, 2017—March 31, 2017		2,927,758	$	10.84
April 1, 2017—June 30, 2017		1,908,867		11.14
July 1, 2017—September 30, 2017		1,675,330		12.58
Total Redemptions		6,511,955		11.38
Repurchases^3,4
January 1, 2017—March 31, 2017		552,955	$	11.07
April 1, 2017—June 30, 2017		397,539		11.25
July 1, 2017—July 31, 2017		19,806		12.99
August 1, 2017—August 31, 2017		56,827		12.95
September 1, 2017—September 30, 2017		219,238
Total Repurchases		1,246,365	$	11.68
Total Redemptions and Repurchases		7,758,320	$	11.43	$	228,572,015

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
Common stock outstanding¹		288,308
Partnership units²		167,287
RSUs (Treasury stock method)		539
Other		1,207
Total³		457,341

	Total		Less Than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More Than 5 Years
Long-term debt and collateralized borrowings¹	$	1,966,130	$	254,489	$	1,293,870	$	305,271	$	112,500
Warehouse notes payable		659,732		659,732		—		—		—
Operating leases²		517,200		69,326		114,922		91,164		241,788
Interest on long-term debt and collateralized borrowings³ ⁴		401,346		91,654		101,100		28,471		180,121
Short-term borrowings⁵		6,313		6,313	—		—		—
Interest on Short-term borrowings		315		315	—		—		—
Other ⁶		30,709		8,000		16,000		6,709	—
Total contractual obligations	$	3,581,745	$	1,089,829	$	1,525,892	$	431,615	$	534,409

Exhibit Number		Exhibit Title

2.1		Transaction Agreement, dated as of July 17, 2017, by and among BGC Partners, Inc., BGC Partners, L.P., Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P., Cantor Commercial Real Estate Company, L.P., Cantor Sponsor, L.P., CF Real Estate Finance Holdings, L.P. and CF Real Estate Finance Holdings GP, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 21, 2017)

10.1		Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of CF Real Estate Finance Holdings, L.P., dated as of September 8, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 8, 2017)

10.2		Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of September 8, 2017, by and among BGC Partners, Inc., as the Borrower, certain subsidiaries of the Borrower, as Guarantors, the several financial institutions from time to time as parties thereto, as Lenders, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 8, 2017)

10.3		Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of September 8, 2017, by and among BGC Partners, Inc., as the Borrower, certain subsidiaries of the Borrower, as Guarantors, the several financial institutions from time to time party thereto, as Lenders, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 8, 2017)

12.1		Computation of Ratio of Earning to Fixed Charges.

31.1		Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification by the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32		Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101		The following materials from BGC Partners’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2017 are formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, (ii) the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity, and (vi) Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

BGC Partners, Inc.

		/ S / HOWARD W. LUTNICK
Name:		Howard W. Lutnick
Title:		Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

		/ S / Steven R. McMurray
Name:		Steven R. McMurray
Title:		Chief Financial Officer

This ‘10-Q’ Filing	Date	Other Filings

	3/31/24
	3/31/23
	5/31/21
	5/27/21
	3/9/21
	1/1/20	3
	12/9/19
	9/8/19
	3/13/19
	1/1/19
	12/31/18	10-K, 11-K, 4
	10/11/18
	9/25/18	8-K
	9/1/18
	7/19/18
	6/20/18	4, 8-K, DEF 14A
	4/20/18
	2/19/18
	1/1/18
	12/14/17	3, 8-K
	11/29/17	4
	11/14/17
Filed on:	11/8/17
	11/7/17	4
	10/26/17	8-K
	10/25/17
	10/23/17
	10/18/17
	10/12/17
	10/11/17
For Period end:	9/30/17
	9/29/17	8-K
	9/27/17
	9/25/17
	9/20/17
	9/8/17	8-K
	9/7/17
	9/1/17
	8/31/17
	8/23/17
	8/22/17
	8/17/17	S-3ASR
	8/1/17
	7/31/17
	7/26/17	8-K
	7/20/17
	7/19/17
	7/18/17
	7/17/17	8-K
	7/1/17
	6/30/17	10-Q
	6/26/17
	6/21/17
	6/8/17	4
	6/6/17	4, 8-K, DEF 14A
	5/31/17
	4/21/17
	4/12/17	8-K
	4/1/17
	3/31/17	10-Q
	2/28/17	10-K
	2/24/17
	2/7/17
	1/31/17
	1/1/17
	12/31/16	10-K, 11-K
	12/30/16
	12/15/16
	12/14/16	8-K
	12/1/16
	11/27/16
	11/16/16
	11/11/16	4
	11/10/16	4
	11/7/16	4
	11/4/16
	10/25/16
	10/20/16
	10/1/16
	9/30/16	10-Q, 4, 8-K
	9/1/16
	8/16/16	4, S-4, S-8
	8/4/16
	7/21/16
	7/15/16
	7/13/16
	7/1/16
	6/30/16	10-Q, 8-K
	6/23/16
	6/22/16	4, 8-K, DEF 14A, PRE 14A
	5/27/16	8-K
	5/1/16
	4/27/16	8-K
	4/4/16
	3/31/16	10-Q, 8-K
	3/9/16	4
	3/2/16	4
	2/25/16	4
	2/24/16	4
	2/23/16	4
	2/9/16
	1/22/16
	1/15/16	8-K
	1/13/16
	1/12/16	8-K, S-3ASR
	1/1/16
	12/31/15	10-K, 10-K/A, 11-K, 8-K
	12/22/15	8-K
	12/11/15	8-K, 8-K/A
	11/4/15	4
	10/27/15
	10/9/15	S-3ASR
	10/1/15	8-K
	7/19/15
	7/10/15	8-K
	6/23/15
	6/15/15	S-3ASR
	6/9/15	4
	6/5/15	4, 8-K
	4/28/15
	4/13/15	4, 8-K
	3/13/15
	3/11/15
	1/30/15	4, 8-K
	12/9/14	4, 8-K
	12/5/14	4, 8-K
	11/20/14	424B5, 8-K, S-3ASR, SC 13D/A, SC TO-T/A
	10/3/14
	5/9/14	10-Q
	4/10/14
	2/5/14	4
	1/22/14	8-K
	11/6/13
	10/29/13
	10/2/13
	7/1/13	11-K, 8-K
	6/30/13	10-Q
	6/28/13	8-K
	1/7/13
	6/26/12
	3/9/12
	2/14/12	4, SC 13G/A
	7/29/11
	7/19/11	4, UPLOAD
	4/1/08	3/A, 4, 4/A, 8-K, 8-K/A
	3/31/08	10-Q
	12/31/06	10-K, 10-K/A, 11-K, ARS, NT 11-K
		List all Filings