SEC Info  
  Home     Search     My Interests     Help     Sign In     Please Sign In  

International Test Systems Inc · SB-1/A · On 4/7/03

Filed On 4/7/03 1:45pm ET   ·   SEC File 333-88179   ·   Accession Number 1214782-3-93

  in   Show  and 
Help... Wildcards:  ? (any letter),  * (many).  Logic:  for Docs: (and), (or);  for Text: (anywhere),  "(&)" (near).
  As Of               Filer                 Filing     As/For/On Docs:Pgs              Issuer               Agent

 4/07/03  International Test Systems Inc    SB-1/A                 4:80                                     Loev Corporate F..Inc/FA

Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration of Securities by a Small-Business Issuer   ·   Form SB-1
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: SB-1/A      Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration of            71    364K 
                          Securities by a Small-Business Issuer                  
 2: EX-4.5      Escrow Agreement                                       6     36K 
 3: EX-5.1      Legal Opinion                                          2±     9K 
 4: EX-23.1     Auditors Consent                                       1      6K 


SB-1/A   ·   Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration of Securities by a Small-Business Issuer
Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page
2Calculation of Registration Fee
4The Offering
"Risk Factors
28Unifund
49Pensar Technologies, LLC
SB-1/A1st Page of 71TOCTopPreviousNextBottomJust 1st
 
Sponsored Ads...

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 7, 2003 Registration No. 333-88179 Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, DC 20549 ------------------------------------------- Amendment No. 6 to FORM SB-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 International Test Systems, Inc. -------------------------------- (Name of small business issuer in its charter) Delaware 4214 74-29581956 -------- ---- ----------- (State or other jurisdiction of Primary North American (IRS Employer incorporation or organization) Industry Classification Identification No.) System Code Number) 16161 College Oak, Suite 101, San Antonio, Texas 78249; (210) 408-6019 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (Address and telephone number of principal executive offices) Carey Birmingham, President With Copies to: 16161 College Oak, Suite 101 David M. Loev, Attorney at Law San Antonio, TX 78249 2777 Allen Parkway, Suite 1000 (210) 408-6019 Houston, TX 77019; (713) 524-4110 (Name, address and telephone number of agent for service) Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this registration statement. If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act Registration statement of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. | | If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. |X| If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. | | If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box. | |
SB-1/A2nd Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 2nd
[Enlarge/Download Table] CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE Title of Each Class Amount to be Proposed Proposed Amount of of Registered Maximum Maximum Registration Shares to be Registered Offering Price Aggregate Fee Per Share Offering Price Common Shares 1,250,000 .40(1) 500,000 46.00 Class A Warrants 1,250,000 .10 125,000 11.50 Class B Warrants 1,250,000 .10 125,000 11.50 Common Stock underlying Class A warrants Common Stock underlying 1,250,000 2.50 3,125,000 287.50 Class B warrants 1,250,000 4.50 5,625,000 517.50 -------------- ----------- ---------- ------------ Total 6,250,000 $9,500,000 $ 874.00 <FN> (1) There is no current market value for the securities. (2) Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee based on Rule 457(f)(2). The Registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to Section 8(a), may determine. Disclosure alternate used (check one): Alternate 1 [X] Alternate 2 [ ]
SB-1/A3rd Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 3rd
Prospectus Initial Public Offering International Test Systems, Inc. This registration statement relates to the offer and sale of up to 1,250,000 shares of common stock @ $.40 per share, 1,250,000 class A warrants @ $.10 per warrant with an exercise price of $2.50 per share and 1,250,000 class B warrants @ $.10 per warrant with an exercise price of $4.50 per share of International Test Systems, Inc. The registration statement also relates to the resale of up to 2,500,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the class A warrants and the class B warrants. This is a "best efforts, no minimum offering." There is a maximum gross offering of $750,000 prior to warrant exercises. There is a minimum purchase requirement of 1,000 shares or 4,000 warrants, but the company may in its discretion accept subscriptions for less shares or warrants. We are offering these shares through Public Securities, Inc. on a "best efforts" basis. We will pay Public Securities, Inc. 10% commissions on all stock and warrant sales that they make. In addition, we have an arrangement with Public Securities, Inc. providing them the option to purchase an amount equal to 10% of the shares of our common stock sold in this offering. Prior to the offering of the shares and warrants as described herein, there has been no public market for the common stock of International Test Systems and there are no assurances that a public market will develop following completion of this offering or that, if any such market does develop, it will be sustained. [Download Table] Underwriting Discounts and Proceeds to Price to Public (1) Commissions (2) Issuer (3) -------------------- ---------------- ----------- Per Share $ .40 $ .04 $ .36 Per Class A Warrant $ .10 $ .01 $ .09 Per Class B Warrant $ .10 $ .01 $ .09 Total Maximum $ 750,000(4) $ 75,000 $ 675,000 <FN> (1) Maximum of 250,000 shares may be sold on a best efforts basis. (2) Public Securities, Inc. serves as the underwriter in this offering. (3) The net proceeds to International Test Systems is before the payment of certain expenses in connection with this offering estimated at $12,500 in the event we sell 312,500 shares and a maximum of $75,000. (4) Does not reflect the exercise of any warrants. An investor may purchase either shares of our common stock, class A redeemable warrants, or class B redeemable warrants. This is a "best efforts, no minimum offering." Amounts received will be distributed to the company. This offering will extend for a period of one year from the date of this prospectus. Information contained herein is subject to completion or amendment. The registration statement relating to the securities has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted prior to the time the registration statement becomes effective. This prospectus shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any State in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state. THIS OFFERING INVOLVES A SIGNIFICANT DEGREE OF RISK AND PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS NEED TO READ THE SECTION CALLED "RISK FACTORS" IN THIS PROSPECTUS WHICH BEGINS ON PAGE 9. NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION, HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED THESE SECURITIES OR PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. International Test Systems, Inc. Table Of Contents Prospectus Summary 6 Risk Factors 9 Plan Of Distribution 10 Use Of Proceeds 15 Dilution 18 Capitalization 20 Business Of The Company 21 Management's Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations For The Period 34 Directors, Officers And Key Personnel Of The Company 38 Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners And Management 40 Selling Shareholders 42 Certain Transactions 42 Description Of The Securities 44 Interests Of Named Experts And Counsel 48 Legal Proceedings 48 Federal Tax Aspects 48 Certain Provisions Of Our Articles And By Laws 49
SB-1/A4th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 4th
Prospectus Summary The Company International Test Systems, Inc. was originally incorporated in Texas in September 1996. This Texas corporation was dissolved in September 1999 and reincorporated in Delaware on September 20, 1999 with all of the same assets and liabilities and substantially identical ownership. Pensar Technologies, LLC was formed as a Texas Limited Liability Company on May 5, 1995. On May 7, 2002, International Test Systems, Inc. entered into an asset purchase agreement with Pensar whereby International Test Systems acquired all of the assets and certain of the liabilities of Pensar. Both International Test Systems and Pensar are entities under partial common control and the financial statements are presented separately until International Test Systems and Pensar entered into an asset purchase agreement in May 2002. References in this document to "International Test Systems", "Pensar Technologies, LLC", "company", "we", "our" and "us" refer to International Test Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation. Our operations have been restricted to only a few sales to date. We market, sell and distribute a family of hardware and software products used to test and troubleshoot components on printed circuit boards. Our telephone number is (210) 408-6019 and our e-mail address is its@itestsystems.com. The Offering ------------- Securities offered 1,250,000,000 shares of common stock, 1,250,000 Class A Warrants, and 1,250,000 Class B Warrants Shares of common stock Outstanding Before Offering 2,116,000 Shares of common stock Outstanding after offering (assuming sale Of all shares offered) 3,366,000 Summary Financial Information The summary financial information presented below is derived from our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001. Statement of Operation Data: Years Ended December 31, 2002 December 31, 2001 Revenues $ 9,534 5,675 Cost of Sales 236 - General and Administrative Expenses Paid in Cash 52,023 15,507 Paid in Stock 108,800 139,400 Net Loss $(291,905) (149,232) BALANCE SHEET DATA: December 31, 2002 December 31, 2001 Working Capital $(101,720) $(667) Long-Term Debt $868 - Additional Paid in Capital 1,539,441 1,263,866 Accumulated Deficit (1,457,092) (1,165,187) Total Stockholders' Equity (deficit) 84,499 $100,704 RISK FACTORS You should carefully consider the following risk factors and other information in this prospectus before deciding to become a holder of our common stock. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business and financial results could be negatively affected to a significant extent. RISK THAT CAPITAL WILL NOT BE RAISED TO FINANCE OUR OPERATIONS. We anticipate that proceeds from this offering, assuming we raise a minimum of $125,000, will satisfy our working capital requirements for at least the next twelve months. In the event we do not raise at least the minimum offering, it is unlikely that we will continue our business plan and we may be forced to curtail or cease our operations. Risk that additional capital will not be raised to finance our ongoing operations as current funds are insufficient and we expect future losses. Even if we are successful in raising capital in this offering, we will likely need to raise additional capital to continue and/or expand our operations. If we do not raise the additional capital, the value of your investment in our company may become worthless. AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001 AND DECEMBER 31, 2002, OUR COMPANY HAD LOSSES OF $149,232 AND $291,905, RESPECTIVELY. As of December 31, 2001, and December 31, 2002, our company had negative working capital of $667 and $101,720, respectively. We expect negative cash flow and operating losses to continue for the foreseeable future until we can successfully market and distribute products, develop new technologies and produce commercially viable future products and/or enter into successful strategic ventures with other entities. We expect our operating costs to increase. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that we will ever achieve or sustain profitability. Therefore, we may not be able to continue our business in the future. In this event, it can be anticipated that investors will lose all or part of their investment. WE HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO GENERATE A PROFIT SINCE OUR INCEPTION AND IT IS UNLIKELY THAT WE WILL GENERATE A PROFIT IN THE NEAR FUTURE,IF AT ALL. As we have been unable to generate sufficient revenues to cover our overhead since we were incorporated, and it is not likely that we will be profitable in the near future, our future success will be materially dependent upon our raising capital to fund our ongoing operations. In the event we are unsuccessful raising additional capital, it is likely that we will curtail our operations and investors will lose all or part of their investment. Even if we are successful in raising additional capital, if we are unable to generate profits from our business, it is likely that we will run out of capital and that you will lose all or part of your investment. RISK THAT OUR TECHNOLOGY IS NOT ACCEPTED IN THE MARKETPLACE Our success depends on continued growth in the need for testing and troubleshooting components on printed circuit boards. The success of our business will ultimately depend on acceptance of hardware and software products to test and troubleshoot components on printed circuit boards. Our technology is substantially untested in the marketplace; which could result in unanticipated capital expenditures and delays in achieving marketing success in the event product improvements or upgrades are required. Even if our product is successful, if we do not market our technology effectively, it will not be accepted in the marketplace. WE DEPEND ON CAREY BIRMINGHAM TO EXECUTE OUR BUSINESS PLAN. Our potential for success depends significantly on our Chief Executive Officer, Carey Birmingham. We are heavily dependent upon Mr. Birmingham to implement our business plan. We have entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Birmingham which provides for compensation to Mr. Birmingham contingent upon our raising funds in this offering. In the event we are unsuccessful raising capital in this offering sufficient to compensate Mr. Birmingham there is no assurance that he will continue to manage our affairs in the future. Further, we have not obtained a "key person" life insurance policy on Mr. Birmingham. The loss of his services could have a significant adverse effect on our business. BEST EFFORTS, NO MINIMUM OFFERING; YOU MAY LOSE YOUR ENTIRE INVESTMENT.
SB-1/A5th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 5th
The shares offered hereby will be sold on a "best efforts" basis. We cannot assure that all or any of the shares or warrants offered will be sold. We are not required to receive any minimum amount of subscriptions before accepting such subscriptions for investment in International Test Systems, Inc. Accordingly, investors whose subscriptions are accepted first run the additional risk that we may not raise all of the funds we are seeking in this offering which could materially and adversely affect our ability to finance our business plan. THERE IS CURRENTLY NO MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK. We intend to apply to have our common stock quoted on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board, a NASD sponsored and operated quotation system for equity securities as soon as practicable upon our registration statement being declared effective by the SEC. It is a more limited trading market than the NASDAQ SmallCap Market, and timely, accurate quotations of the price of our common stock may not always be available. You may expect trading volume to be low in such a market. Consequently, the activity of only a few shares may affect the market and may result in wide swings in price and in volume. It is likely that trading in our stock, if any, will be limited and sporadic. INVESTORS MAY FACE SIGNIFICANT RESTRICTIONS ON THE RESALE OF INTERNATIONAL TEST SYSTEMS, INC. STOCK DUE TO FEDERAL REGULATIONS OF PENNY STOCK. Once our common stock is listed on the OTC Bulletin Board, it will be subject to the requirements of Rule 15(g)9, promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act as long as the price of our common stock is below $5.00 per share. Under such rule, broker-dealers who recommend low-priced securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors must satisfy special sales practice requirements, including a requirement that they make an individualized written suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's consent prior to the transaction. The Securities Enforcement Remedies and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990 also requires additional disclosure in connection with any trades involving a stock defined as a penny stock. Generally, the Commission defines a penny stock as any equity security not traded on an exchange or quoted on NASDAQ that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share. The required penny stock disclosures include the delivery, prior to any transaction, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated with it. Such requirements could severely limit the market liquidity of the securities and the ability of purchasers to sell their securities in the secondary market. Note: In addition to the above risks, businesses are often subject to risks not foreseen or fully appreciated by management. In reviewing this prospectus potential investors should keep in mind other possible risks that could be important. This prospectus contains all of the representations by our company concerning this offering, and no person shall make different or broader statements than those contained herein, investors are cautioned not to rely upon any information not expressly set forth in this offering. Plan Of Distribution We are seeking to raise a maximum offering amount of $750,000, without the exercise of any warrants, through the sale of up to 1,250,000 shares of common stock @ $.40 per share, 1,250,000 class A warrants @ $.10 per warrant with an exercise price of $2.50 per share and 1,250,000 class B warrants @ $.10 per warrant with an exercise price of $4.00 per share. The public offering price of our securities will not change until completion of the public offering distribution. No public market currently exists for shares for International Test Systems common stock. We intend to apply to have our shares traded on the OTC Bulletin Board as soon as practicable and upon our registration statement becoming effective.
SB-1/A6th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 6th
Our offering will be sold on a first come, first served basis by Public Securities, Inc., as well as through our officers and directors. Our officers and directors may participate in the distribution of the offering and will meet the safe harbor provisions of SEC Rule 3a4-1 with respect to exemption from registration as a broker/dealer. We have entered into an underwriting agreement with Public Securities setting forth the terms of our agreement with them. Pursuant to this agreement, we will pay them commissions of 10% of shares and warrants sold for a total of $75,000 for the maximum offering. In addition, we will pay Public Securities, Inc. an unaccountable expense not to exceed $5,000. We have agreed to sell Public Securities an option to purchase up to an aggregate of 125,000 shares and up to 125,000 warrants at 140% of the offering price of the share or warrant or $.56 per share and $.14 per warrant, as the case may be, commencing one year from the date of this prospectus and expiring five years from the date of this prospectus. The options will be issued for the shares and warrants at the rate of one underwriter's purchase option for every ten of the respective securities sold in this offering. The securities issuable upon exercise of the purchase option are identical to those offered by this prospectus except that the securities issued pursuant to the purchase option expire five years from the date of this prospectus. The securities purchase option may not be transferred, sold, assigned or hypothecated during the one-year period following the date of this prospectus, except to underwriters and selected dealers and to officers and partners of the underwriters or the selected dealers. The securities purchase option grants to holders demand and "piggy back" registration rights for periods of five years from the date of this prospectus with respect to the registration under the Securities Act of the securities directly and indirectly issuable upon exercise of the purchase option. The exercise price and amounts issuable upon exercise of the securities purchase option may be adjusted in certain circumstances including in the event of a stock dividend, or our recapitalization, reorganization, merger or consolidation. However, the purchase option will not be adjusted for issuances of common stock at a price below its exercise price. Our company has agreed to indemnify Public Securities against liabilities under the securities laws. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act") may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the small business issuer pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the company has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. No commissions or other compensation will be paid to our officers and directors in connection with this offering. Public Securities, Inc., located at 300 North Argonne Road, Suite 202, Spokane, Washington 99212, (509) 892-5590, was established in 1986. It operates as a full service broker-dealer and is a member of the NASD and SIPC. Public Securities specializes in market making and initiating quotations on untraded companies. There is no assurance that Public Securities will make a market in the Company's securities. There is no material relationship between Public Securities and the company or its management. If additional information is desired regarding Public Securities, Inc., please feel free to inquire through the NASD Regulation website, www.nasdr.com. Information regarding the disciplinary history of securities firms and their registered representatives is available through this site. This registration statement relates to the offer and sale of up to 1,250,000 shares of common stock @ $.40 per share, 1,250,000 class A warrants @ $.10 per warrant with an exercise price of $2.50 per share and 1,250,000 class B warrants @ $.10 per warrant with an exercise price of $4.50 per share of International Test Systems, Inc. The registration statement also relates to the resale of up to 2,500,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the class A warrants and the class B warrants. This is a "best efforts" offering. We will promptly deposit all investor money into an escrow account with our escrow agent, David M. Loev, Esq., 2777 Allen Parkway, Suite 1000, Houston, Texas 77019, (713) 524-4110. We may reject a subscriber's subscription for any reason. If a subscription is rejected, in whole or in part, the subscription funds, or portion thereof, will be promptly returned to the prospective investor without interest by depositing a check (payable to said investor) in the amount of said funds in the United States mail, certified returned-receipt requested. Subscriptions may not be revoked, cancelled, or terminated by the subscriber, except as provided herein. Each subscription for securities in this offering that is accepted by us will be credited immediately to our company cash accounts, and such funds may be spent by us at our discretion, without any waiting period or other contingency. We intend to sell our securities in the following states: Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Florida Illinois Maine Maryland Michigan Minnesota New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania South Carolina Tennessee Texas Virginia Washington D.C. Wisconsin Wyoming No person or group has made any commitment to purchase any or all of the securities. We cannot state at this point how many of the securities will be sold. Insiders and affiliates will not purchase securities in order to reach the minimum but anticipate purchasing our securities after we raise the minimum offering amount.
SB-1/A7th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 7th
We reserve the right to reject any subscription in full or in part, and to terminate the offering at any time. No person, individual or group has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations in connection with this offering other than those contained in this prospectus and, if given or made, such information or representation must not be relied on as having been authorized by us or our officers. This prospectus is not an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any of the securities it offers to any person in any jurisdiction in which that offer or solicitation is unlawful. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor any sale hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that the information in this prospectus is correct as of any date later than the date of this prospectus. The securities may only be offered, sold or traded in those states where the offering and/or securities have been registered, or where there is an exemption from registration. Purchasers of securities, either in this offering or in any subsequent trading market which may develop, must be residents of states in which the securities are registered or exempt from registration. Some of the exemptions are self-executing, that is to say that there are no notice or filing requirements, and compliance with the conditions of the exemption render the exemption applicable. If all of the securities we are offering are sold, we will have outstanding 3,366,000 shares of common stock prior to exercise of any of the warrants we are offering. The shares of common stock sold in this offering will be freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act, except for any shares purchased by one of our "affiliates", which may be sold only while this registration statement or another registration statement covering resales by those affiliates is effective, or in accordance with Rule 144 or private sales exemptions. An affiliate is a person controlling, controlled by or under common control with our company. There are no lockup agreements or resale restrictions on any of our outstanding shares, other than those governed by Rule 144. Note: After reviewing the amount of compensation to the selling agents or finders for selling the securities, and the nature of any relationship between the selling agents or finders and the company, a potential investor should assess the extent to which it may be inappropriate to rely upon any recommendation by the selling agents or finders to buy the securities. Note: Equity investors should be aware that unless the company is able to complete a further public offering or the company is able to be sold for cash or merged with a public company that their investment in the company may be illiquid indefinitely. Determination Of The Offering Price Prior to this offering, there has been no market for the common stock and/or warrants of the company, and we have essentially had no substantial business operations to date. The offering price has been determined arbitrarily by our board of directors. For the year ended December 31, 2001 and for the year ended December 31, 2002, losses were ($149,232) and ($291,905), respectively with a net loss per share of $(0.08) and $(0.14), respectively. Our proforma net tangible book value as of December 31, 2001 was $100,704 or $.05 per share. Our proforma net tangible book value as of December 31, 2002 was $84,499 or $.04 per share. Our proforma net tangible book value as of December 31, 2002 based upon the number of shares outstanding after this maximum offering if all securities are sold will be $687,374 or $.20 per share. The percentage of outstanding shares the investors in the offering will have if the maximum is sold and if 312,500 shares are sold as well as if the warrants are exercised is set forth as follows: % if 312,500 Shares if Maximum Offering % if Maximum Offering are Sold and No Amount Sold and all Sold Warrants Exercised Warrants Exercised 13% 37% 64% Management is implicitly attributing a value of $124,874 to our company in the event 312,500 shares are sold and $687,374 if the maximum is sold.
SB-1/A8th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 8th
After reviewing the above, potential investors should consider whether or not the offering price or exercise price for the securities is appropriate at the present stage of the company's development. Use Of Proceeds The gross proceeds of the offering, excluding warrant exercises, assuming the sale of $125,000, $500,000 and $750,000 of securities in the event the maximum offering is sold is provided below. We expect all of our organizational expenses will be paid prior to the effective date of this prospectus, as well as the majority of offering expenses, including legal, accounting and other professional fees. We are offering the securities through Public Securities, Inc., as well as our officers and directors. We will pay Public Securities, Inc. a commission of 10% on all stock and warrant sales made via Public Securities. No commissions or other compensation will be paid to our officers and directors in connection with this offering. We will receive proceeds from the exercise of the warrants, if any warrants are exercised. We intend to use the gross proceeds as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Maximum Offering $125,000 (1) Percent $500,000 Percent $750,000 (2) Percent Gross Aggregate Proceeds $ 125,000 100% $500,000 100% $ 750,000 100% Less Offering Expenses and Commissions: Offering Costs(3) 72,125 58% 72,125 14% 72,125 10% Commissions 12,500 10% 50,000 10% 75,000 10% Net offering expenses 84,625 68% 122,125 24% 147,125 20% Net Offering Proceeds 40,375 32% 377,875 76% 602,875 80% Advertising and Direct Marketing: Corporate - - 25,000 5% 46,500 6% Product 5,000 4% 80,125 16% 167,250 22% Consulting and Outsourcing Fees, Wages and Salaries: Portion of President's salary 25,000 20% 45,000 9% 45,000 6% Marketing Executive - - 48,000 10% 60,000 8% Marketing and Sales Support - - 37,500 8% 60,000 8% Administrative Support - - 21,500 4% 24,000 3% Benefits and Insurance - - 20,250 4% 33,000 4% General Corporate & Working Capital: Secondary Market Program 1,125 1% 26,000 5% 39,075 5% Investor Relations 2,000 2% 24,000 5% 25,000 3% New Product R&D - - 5,000 1% 16,000 2% Inventory Purchases - - 3,000 1% 8,000 1% Office Expenses & Rental 2,750 2% 12,500 3% 22,500 3% Personnel Retention and Training - - 10,000 2% 32,250 4% Debt Reduction(4) 5,000 4% 20,000 4% 25,000 3% 125,000 100% 500,000 100% 750,000 100% Total Gross Offering Proceeds <FN> (1) Assumes sale of 312,500 shares, but may result from sale of less shares with the sale of warrants. (2) Assumes the sale of 1,250,000 shares, 1,250,000 Class A warrants, and 1,250,000 Class B warrants. (3) Incurred by BFP Texas on behalf of the company and will be reimbursed to BFP Texas, Ltd., a limited partnership controlled by our president, Carey Birmingham, upon raising a minimum of $125,000. (4) The indebtedness which will be discharged includes accounts payable. During the last fiscal year, approximately $6,000 was incurred for various general business purposes, including travel, office supplies and general expenses. Interest rates on theses credit cards ranges from 10.99% to 20.99%. Certain indebtedness was incurred in fiscal year 2002 in the amount of approximately $2,500. In the event we raise a minimum of $125,000 from this offering, we expect these proceeds to satisfy our cash requirements for the next 12 months. However, if only the minimum is raised, this will result in slower development and introduction of new products, as well as a more limited sales plan. We cannot assure you that we will be able to raise additional funds on favorable terms, if at all. Some expenses, such as marketing expenses and salaries, contemplate spending with and without a third party distributor. We are not in default on, nor in breach of, any loan, note, lease or any other obligation or indebtedness. We are not subject to any unsatisfied judgments, liens or settlement obligations. We have no significant amount of trade payables that have not been paid within the stated trade term. While we do anticipate cash flow problems in the event this offering is unsuccessful, we have scaled back operations and have deferred growth until we receive a capital infusion. The foregoing represents our present intentions and best estimate of the allocation of the net proceeds of the sale of the securities offered in this offering based on our contemplated operations, our business plan, and current industry conditions. Until we use the net proceeds for a particular purpose, we will invest them in short-term interest bearing securities, which may be investment grade securities, money market funds, certificates of deposit, or direct or guaranteed obligations of the United States government. Note: After reviewing the portion of the offering allocated to the payment of offering expenses, and to the immediate payment to management and promoters of any fees, reimbursements, past salaries or similar payments, a potential investor should consider whether the remaining portion of his investment, which would be that part available for future development of the company's business and operations, would be adequate. Dilution The following table shows, on a pro forma basis determined as of April 1, 2003, the difference between existing stockholders and new investors purchasing securities in this offering. Raise of $125,000 Assuming 312,500 Shares Purchased [Download Table] Percent of Percent Number Total Amount Amount Raised Total ------------ -------------- ------------- ----- Present stockholders 2,116,000 87.1% $206,469 62.3% New stockholders 312,500 12.9% 125,000 37.7% ------------ -------------- ------------- ----- Total 2,428,500 100.0% $331,469 100.0% ============ ============== ============== ======
SB-1/A9th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 9th
[Download Table] Raise of Maximum Offering Amount of $750,000 Assuming 1,250,000 Shares Purchased Percent of Percent Number Total Amount Amount Raised Total ------------ -------------- ------------- ----- Present stockholders 2,116,000 62.9% $206,469 21.6% New stockholders 1,250,000 37.1% 750,000 78.4% ------------ -------------- ------------- ----- Total 3,366,000 100.0% $923,469 100.0% ============ ============== ============== ====== [Download Table] Raise of Maximum Offering Amount and Exercise of All Warrants $9,500,000 raised and 3,750,000 purchased and converted Percent of Percent Number Total Amount Amount Raised Total ------------ -------------- ------------- ----- Present stockholders 2,116,000 36.1% $206,469 2.1% New stockholders 3,750,000 63.9% 9,500,000 97.9% ------------ -------------- ------------- ----- Total 5,866,000 100.0% 9,706,469 100.0% ============ ============== ============== ====== On December 31, 2002, we had net tangible book value of $84,499, OR $.04 per share, based on the proforma 2,150,000 shares outstanding stock owned by our shareholders. The net tangible book value per share is equal to the company's total tangible assets, less our total liabilities, and divided by our total number of shares of common stock outstanding. After giving effect to the maximum sale of the common stock and associated warrants at the public offering price of $0.40 per share and $0.10 per warrant less the associated offering costs, the application of the estimated net offering proceeds including commissions, our pro forma net tangible book value, as of December 31, 2002, would have been $687,374 or $.20 per share. This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $.16 per share to existing stockholders, and an immediate dilution of $.24 per share to new investors purchasing shares in this offering. Without the purchase of the warrants and assuming the sale of 312,500 shares of common stock in this offering, our pro forma net tangible book value, as of December 31, 2002, would have been $124,874 or $.05 per share. This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $.01 per share to existing stockholders and an immediate dilution of $.35 per share to new investors purchasing shares in this offering. Without the purchase of the warrants and assuming completion of the maximum offering, our pro forma net tangible book value, as of December 31, 2002, would have been $462,374 or $.14 per share. This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $.10 per share to existing stockholders and an immediate dilution of $.26 per share to new investors purchasing shares in this offering. Based on the above, the following table illustrates the per share dilution in net tangible book value per share to new investors: Minimum Maximum ------------ ----------- Public offering price per share $0.40 $0.40 of common stock Net tangible book value per share as of December 31, 2002 $.04 $.04 Increase per share attributed to investors in this offering $.01 $.10 Pro forma Net tangible book value per share after the offering $.05 $.14 Net tangible book value dilution per share to new investors $.35 $.26
SB-1/A10th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 10th
Capitalization We amended our articles of incorporation in July 2002 to authorize the issuance of fifty million shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share. [Enlarge/Download Table] Capitalization Table December 31, 2002 Actual As Adjusted for Sale of 312,500 Shares Debt: Short term debt $105,567 $105,567 Long term debt $868 $868 Total debt $106,435 $106,435 Stockholders equity (deficit): Preferred stock authorized 10,000,000 Shares, $.001 par value each. At December 31, 2002 there are 0 shares outstanding 0 0 Common stock authorized 50,000,000 shares, $.001 par value each. At December 31, 2002, there were 2,150,000 shares outstanding 2,150 2,463 Additional paid in capital: 1,539,441 1,664,128 Deficit accumulated during development stage (1,457,092) (1,457,092) Total Stockholders' Equity 84,499 209,499 ----------- ---------- Total capitalization $190,934 $315,934 Forward Looking Statements Some of the information in this prospectus may contain forward-looking statements. Such statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may", "expect", "anticipate", "continue", or other similar words. These statements discuss future expectations, contain projections of results of operations or of financial condition or state other "Forward-Looking" information. When considering such forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors and other cautionary statements included in this prospectus. The risk factors noted in the "Risk Factors" section and the other factors noted throughout this prospectus, including certain risks and uncertainties, could cause the actual results of the company to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Business Of The Company Our Business. We manufacture, market, sell and distribute a family of hardware and software products used to test and troubleshoot components on printed circuit boards.
SB-1/A11th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 11th
We have designed and sold printed circuit board test products since Pensar was formed on April 20, 1995. Our company had a ten-year exclusive distribution agreement with Pensar Technologies, dated June 19, 1999 amended April 15, 2000 and June 1, 2001, granting us the exclusive, worldwide right to market, sell and distribute these test products. We had the right to purchase products from Pensar at a 40% discount off the price to the consumer. We had no obligation to prepurchase any products or parts for our inventory. In consideration for our distributorship, we were required to pay Pensar a one-time $5,000 distributorship fee upon execution of the agreement and a monthly $1,500 distributorship fee until July 31, 2000. In addition, the agreement contained a right of first refusal to purchase the existing technology. We had the option to renew the distribution agreement for an additional five (5) year term by delivering written notice to Pensar 90 days prior to the expiration of the initial term. By amendments executed in April 2000 and June 2001 by both our company and Pensar, we were granted both a first right of refusal to purchase the CircuiTest Technology from Pensar as well as an option to purchase the technology at any time during the term of the distribution agreement and any extensions. The option to purchase allowed us to purchase the technology for the lesser of $375,000 or 75% of the fair market value as determined by an independent third party appraiser. On May 1, 2002, International Test Systems, Inc. entered into an asset purchase agreement with Pensar whereby International Test Systems acquired all of the assets and certain of the liabilities of Pensar in consideration for 300,000 shares of International Test Systems' common stock, and the assumption by International Test Systems of Pensar liabilities in the amount of $30,835. The Products we own and market. The products we own and market are known collectively at the CircuiTest In-Circuit Component Test System and include the 2000S In-Circuit Component Test System, the CircuiTest 2100 Scanner Expansion and the recently developed 2100 S/OAI (Shorts/Opens Adapter Interface) Shorts and Opens Tester. The CircuiTest 2000S In-Circuit Component System is a personal computer-based product which will troubleshoot, test and allow for the repair of components on assembled printed circuit boards. This system connects with any standard personal computer via a serial communications port and contains its own external power supply. The CircuiTest 2000S tests both analog and digital circuits. Electronic printed circuit boards are now used throughout the electronics industry and will continue to be used in the foreseeable future. Despite the growth of digital technology, we believe the real world to be analog in nature. Digital circuits can only operate on very specialized or "restricted" kinds of electrical signals. All other types of signals are, and must be, translated by analog circuits if digital circuits are to process them. Furthermore, digital circuits require highly stable power sources, and these power supplies themselves must be created from analog components. The CircuiTest 2100 Scanner Expansion, when connected to the CircuiTest 2000S, increases the number of tests the software can automatically perform from 64 to a range of between 256 and 1024. The newly developed 2100 S/OAI can be used by printed circuit board manufacturers and assemblers for located shorts and opens between points on a component, a common problem in the manufacturing process. Attached to the 2100 Scanner Expansion, the S/OAI also has test-point capability of up to 1024 points. Specific electronics components that might use our printed circuit board testing equipment for manufacturing, repair and maintenance include: o Network switching cards; o Computer and peripheral circuit boards in such products as computers, mother boards, monitors, laser printers, matrix printers, scanners, modems, optical disk drives; o Avionics circuit boards, found, for example, in aircraft, navigational and communications electronics; o Medical circuit boards; military and government electronics; telecommunication circuit boards; telephone equipment, answering machines and fax machines; cash registers, scanners, credit card verification equipment; electronic equipment power supplies; and TV and monitor circuit boards. We believe these systems are low-cost, easy-to-use and have numerous attributes that we believe separate them from the competition. Some of these attributes include: o Knowledge-Based Data: A database feature within the product software allows it to locate failed components faster. o Power-Off Testing: Testing of components is performed without applying electrical power to the board. Power-off testing eliminates the risks of damaging the components of the printed circuit boards. o Family of Adaptive Products: Our core testing product, the CircuiTest 2000S System, is designed to facilitate rapid adaptation to meet the unique, complex testing requirements that our customers identify. We believe the CircuiTest 2000S System and its family of flexible, adaptive products can test and troubleshoot the majority of problems that exist in a variety of products or can be readily adapted to do so.
SB-1/A12th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 12th
AMT, Inc., Southwest Test, Inc., and Camtech Electronics each accounted for 1/3 of 2001 sales. Two different customers accounted for 42% and 18% of 2000 sales. No other customer and no vendors accounted for as much as 10% of sales or purchases. We are seeking a capital infusion from this offering: (i) to further develop a market and support our products, (ii) to develop and/or acquire new technologies, and (iii)to seek and form strategic alliances in order to strengthen our company and maximize our future value. Production of Products We Market. Since our inception in 1995, we have continually outsourced all the manufacturing and production of products to various companies around Texas and the Southwest. We intend to continue to subcontract the production and assembly of products to local and regional sheet metal fabricators, manufacturers and assemblers. Numerous back-up outsourcing firms exist in the area, and we believe that we will not be reliant on any single provider. We expect that we would experience a maximum two-week delay if we had to change suppliers or manufacturers. This delay should not have a material effect on sales. Most parts and components are readily available off-the-shelf through wholesalers. Less than 5% of the final product is composed of long-lead-delivery-time components, and we normally carry these in inventory. In addition, to achieve certain discounts, we may, from time to time, warehouse bulk quantities of off-the-shelf components. As of April 1, 2003, the company does not have any backlog of firm orders for products. Future Products We believe that as more and more products are manufactured with printed circuit boards, the demand for manufacturer's defect-testing and troubleshooting systems, such as ours, increases. We anticipate the introduction of new variants to the existing core product line. We believe that there will be a market for enhancements to our core test products. An example of such an enhancement is the autoprober. At present, our testing systems are attached to the circuit board by hand. An autoprober is a robotic chassis into which the circuit board is inserted for hands-free testing. We are very satisfied with our product without the enhancement of the autoprober, as it is less expensive than products with this feature, thereby providing us a price advantage over our competitors. However, providing this enhancement as an alternative for our customers could enlarge our market share. While we do not presently manufacture autoprobers, other companies, such as Probotech, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc., do. We intend to seek the addition of new products to our product line, as well as new ways to maximize the relationships we build with our customers. As recent evidence of this, we provided Probotech a copy of our software in August, 2001 to determine the best way to interface their autoprober technology with our hardware/software CircuiTest technology. Probotech is continuing to examine the likelihood of merging the 2000S technology with their autoprober.
SB-1/A13th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 13th
We further intend to accomplish these goals by seeking distributorships or other strategic relationships, such as joint ventures, mergers, or acquisitions, with companies in our related sphere of influence and industry . We believe that by establishing a superior marketing network and staying abreast of the needs of our customers, as well as current technological advances, we should be able to continually expand our product line and maximize the value of our company. Our Market Strategy 1. Sales Our sales approach will be based on maximizing contact with potential customers by demonstrating that our products have a wider range of capabilities and a lower price point than our competitors' products. Our current internal sales force consists of our president, Carey Birmingham. Our approach includes establishing new additional worldwide distributor relationships and implementing direct marketing campaigns to specific segments of the market. Our direct marketing and sales efforts include increasing our internal direct sales force, trade publication advertising, Internet web site promotion, public relations, trade shows/conferences and database marketing culminating in demonstrations. This method is based upon our own internal experience of selling to this market and does not rely on any specific outside sales study or model. 2. Distribution Our research indicates that, increasingly, companies are creating sales distribution channels composed of non-company employees, and that companies are reducing their dependence on their own direct field sales force. We are building our distribution channels to reflect this industry trend. We may engage additional regional and international distributors as well as value-added resellers ("VAR") and we may engage independent sales representatives, licensing partners and joint venture partners to market and sell products to prospective customers. 3. Direct Mail We are considering the use of direct mail as the first phase of our database marketing campaign to generate more leads and inquiries that lead to sales. In addition, we expect to continue generating prospect lists from trade shows, trade publications, associations, and other sources. We have produced marketing materials describing our products that we can mail to potential customers who respond to our print ads, who attend the trade shows and conferences and who are trade magazine subscribers. We can receive these mailing lists as an advertiser. In order to enhance the success of the direct mail campaign, a portion of the marketing budget may be designated for follow-up phone calls to potential customers and lead management. 4. Advertising and Trade Shows We plan to allocate a portion of our marketing budget to print advertisements. In conjunction with paid advertisements, most trade publications offer complimentary editorials and feature stories on new product releases. We are developing an editorial calendar and will increase our public relations efforts to write articles about the technology. In addition, numerous trade shows exist for electronics manufacturing and testing. We plan to participate at both large, national trade shows and smaller, regional trade shows. Our Industry and Our Competition
SB-1/A14th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 14th
Estimates targeted the 2000 world-wide annual market for personal computer-based testing equipment to be in excess of $400 million. We have obtained this information from Frost & Sullivan, an international marketing and consulting firm. Further, based on management's market experience and knowledge of its customer base, it concurs with this estimate. As described below, other competitors are substantially larger in size and market share or market coverage. However, we anticipate that the CircuiTest Systems will be priced lower than the competition, be easier to use and include a wider range of features. Existing Competition For The CircuiTest Systems Competitive testers to ours are marketed by Huntron Instruments, Inc., a US-based company, Polar, PLC, and DiagnoSYS, Ltd., both UK-based companies. The systems these companies manufacture and sell rely on a graphic voltage/current plot of the component tested on a personal computer, similar to our systems. However, we believe our systems, the CircuiTest 2000S and 2100 scanner expansion, are less expensive, easier to use and when compared to Huntron, can test a much wider range of components. Huntron Our CircuiTest system is most often compared to the Huntron series of testers. Huntron Corporation, a privately held company based in Mill Creek, Washington, has several systems ranging in price from $1,995 for a rudimentary system to $40,000 and more for its advanced auto-prober system. Huntron is privately owned and little detailed financial information is a available. However, Huntron is recognized in the voltage/current curve analysis market and, based upon most recent Dun & Bradstreet reports available, has estimated annual sales of $4.8 million. It is our estimation that Huntron occupies approximately 2-3% of the total US-based Automated Test Equipment Market. Huntron was formed in 1976 and sold to its officers and directors in 1993 for an estimated $4 million. Huntron currently offers a 1-year warranty on its equipment with subsequent one-year extensions for $950, as well as fees for software upgrades. Most often, the CircuiTest 2000S is compared to Huntron's Model 5100DS, priced at $7,495, and more recently the Huntron ProTrack Model 20, priced at $6,995, compared to our CircuiTest 2000S priced at $5,995. After using both the Huntron 5100DS and our CircuiTest 2000S system, a focus group comprised of eight potential customers reported that the Company's CircuiTest system had numerous advantages over its competitor. Polar, PLC Polar is another closely held, private company based out of the United Kingdom. According to recent Dun & Bradstreet reports, the US office of the UK-based company had estimated sales of $1.5 million in fiscal 2001. The products Polar manufactures and markets compete primarily with our products overseas and in the middle east. It is our estimation that Polar occupies less than 1% of the US-Based ATE market and up to 5% of the international ATE Market. DiagnoSYS, Ltd. DiagnoSYS is also closely held, with the parent company based out of the United Kingdom. DiagnoSYS also competes significantly with our equipment in the international markets overseas. It is our estimate that DiagnoSYS occupies approximately a 5% niche in the US-ATE market and up to 10% of the international ATE market. Others The balance of ATE in the US is spread among various large companies with substantially more expensive test equipment, and therefore overlapping customers, as our company. These companies include such household names as Hewlett-Packard subsidiary Agilent, Teradyne and GenRad. More often, we are seen as adjuncts to these manufacturers rather than competitors. In general, the CircuiTest systems compete in circuit board repair and troubleshooting for companies around the world. Although 85% of our historical sales have been in the domestic United States, we have had sales to companies in Brazil, Japan, Egypt, Turkey, Mexico, Canada and Germany, to the US Army. Although these sales represented a small percentage of overall sales, we believe the potential for future business is strong overseas and in Mexico and Canada. Trends In The Company's Historical Operating Results. We foresee two significant issues which will favorably affect our operations in the future: 1. Low Cost/PC-Based Automated Test Equipment
SB-1/A15th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 15th
2. The price point of the CircuiTest 2000S, our core product, is considerably lower than our competitors' comparable automated test equipment. Most often, the CircuiTest 2000S is compared to Huntron's Model 5100DS, priced at $7,495, and more recently the Huntron ProTrack Model 20, priced at $6,995. Our CircuiTest 2000S is priced at $5,995. We believe that current economic conditions, including the PC market, will have a significant impact on the company's business as companies will seek products to test and troubleshoot circuit boards at the best possible price. In the event that a competitor offers a product similar to the one offered by the company at a competitive or reduced price than that offered by the company, we may be forced to reduce our price. Power-Off Testing Our core product, the CircuiTest 2000S, tests and troubleshoots populated, printed circuit boards without applying power to the board. Management believes, and has had confirmation from the marketplace, that power-off testing will increase dramatically in the future due to this feature. As components get smaller and smaller, the trend in the industry will be to test and repair components at the board level with no power supplied to the populated, printed circuit board. When power is supplied to the board to test components, there is a risk of damaging the component or the entire board if the technician incorrectly connects the test equipment. Our "power-free" circuit board testing technology uses known and trusted methods of troubleshooting and virtually eliminates the possibility of damaging the board or its components. Sampling of Features Found in the CircuiTest 2000S & 2100: SymSortTM - A copyrighted database feature which allows technicians to automatically accumulate information on failed components on a printed circuit board. This feature directs the technician to the most likely component to causing a particular problem. TurboScanning - Accelerated software feature allows up to 10 tests/second, or test-by-test discharge of individual points. Digital Image Importing - Software feature allowing the user to view a digital image of the printed circuit board under test, making locating components under test fast and easy. The image can be in photographic format, schematics, or user-designated format. Warranty & Software Upgrades - We offer, through our manufacturer, Pensar, a 3-year repair or replace warranty on its products as well as 3-year free software upgrades for customers. This compares to competitors that offer only 1-year warranties and 1-year free upgrades. Ease of Use - The Windows-based software is icon-driven, and training time averages three hours per customer. Quick Ramp-Up - One of the product's software features is "Scope Mode." Scope Mode allows technicians to begin trouble-shooting boards immediately, without using all the product features and with virtually no training. Low Cost - Based on market comparisons of similar testing systems, the Company's products are inexpensive. Payback typically averages four to six months, but in the case of one customer, was as fast as one day. Family of Adaptive Products - Our core testing product, the CircuiTest 2000S Base System, is designed to facilitate rapid adaptation to meet the unique, complex testing requirements that our customers identify. As more and more products are manufactured with printed circuit boards, the demand for manufacturer's defect-testing and troubleshooting systems, such as ours, increases. The CircuiTest 2000S Base System and its family of flexible, adaptive products can test and troubleshoot the majority of problems that exist in a variety of products with PCBs. Past foreign sales represented units sent to companies in Turkey, India, Japan, China, Egypt, Singapore, Jamaica, Mexico and Canada. The company intends to increase international sales by signing international distribution agreements. Foreign sales as a percent of total sales for the year ended December 31, 2001 were 0%. Past domestic government sales represented sales to the US Air Force, the INS and the US Army. We intend to market aggressively to US government agencies. We had no domestic government sales during the last fiscal year.
SB-1/A16th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 16th
Government Regulation We are not currently subject to direct regulation by any government agency, other than regulations applicable by businesses generally. In the event we become subject to regulation, this may have an effect on our results of operations. Our Significant Employee We have one employee, Carey Birmingham, our president and a director. We plan to maintain lean operations in order to minimize operating expenses while seeking a capital infusion. Depending upon the success of this offering, during the next 12 months we intend to hire between one and three staff members as well as enter into consulting relationships as needed in order to market our products, exploit new technologies and products, and seek and exploit strategic alliances with persons and/or businesses that we believe will strengthen our company and maximize our future value. Initially, we will rely on the expertise of our president, Carey Birmingham to begin marketing efforts. In addition, we anticipate hiring a marketing and sales support person to provide marketing support as well as to conduct "in-house" marketing efforts, such as phone solicitations and direct mailings. We also anticipate hiring an administrative support staff member to provide office support services to the president and the marketing support person. Depending on the success of the foreign marketing efforts, we anticipate employing a marketing and sales executive to aid in the overseas marketing effort. We do not anticipate that any of the employees engaged by us will be subject to any collective bargaining agreements nor do we anticipate the possibility of any strike or work stoppage. Description Of Our Property We currently sublease approximately 200 square feet of office and warehouse space at 16161 College Oak, Suite 101, San Antonio, Texas, which we use for our corporate offices. We entered into a three year sublease with an entity controlled by our president and largest shareholder, BFP Texas Limited, Ltd. and the sub lease expires on December 31, 2004. Our lease payment is $150 per month. In addition to rent, we pay a proportionate share of normal office expenses for the maintenance of the premises. Our president, Carey Birmingham, owns a 4.02% limited partnership interest in BFP Texas, Limited, our landlord. We believe that the existing premises will satisfy our needs in the foreseeable future with only moderate changes needed to be made to the premises to accommodate additional staff. Ample small office space is available to us, and we are not real estate dependent. Intellectual Property On May 1, 2002 we acquired all ownership rights, including copyrights, to the software, hardware and intellectual property associated with the product known as CircuiTest 2000S from Pensar. The hardware is protected from outside duplication by a Programmable Array Logic chip, or "PAL" on the main system motherboard. This chip is installed and programmed in the final phase of quality control at its main office by developers of the system. Immediately after programming, a small fuse is "blown" in the PAL, making the hardware and its functions virtually impossible to duplicate. Pensar is considering upgrading its hardware security by including a modified Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory chip, or EPROM, which also has a fuse "blowing" feature. The inclusion of a chip is expected to increase the cost of the base system by $10-$15. Research and Development We have not spent any funds on research and development of products during the last fiscal year.
SB-1/A17th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 17th
The Development Of Our Company International Test Systems, Inc. ("ITS Texas"), a Texas corporation, was formed in September 1996. In January, 1997 ITS Texas purchased all of the assets and liabilities of Pensar Technologies LLC ("Pensar"), which ceased operations in December 1995. These assets consisted of the technology underlying a device then know as the A-2000 Universal Analog Tester for component level testing of printed circuit boards as well as inventory and furniture and fixtures. As consideration, ITS Texas issued to Pensar 730,000 shares of ITS Texas stock, representing 45.625% of its total shares. As a result of this transaction, ITS Texas embarked on an effort to sell its shares to the public under Rule 504, a Small Corporate Offering Registration (SCOR) exemption. Unfortunately the efforts to sell stock in ITS during 1998 and early 1999 were unsuccessful and ITS Texas abandoned the effort in April 1999. Carey Birmingham, our chairman of the board and chief executive officer, was chairman of the board of ITS Texas and Pensar LLC at this time. Youval Krigel, our director and consultant, is the co-designer of the test system and served as vice president of Pensar and vice president of research and development for ITS Texas at this time. Subsequent to its failed efforts to raise capital in the SCOR, ITS Texas experienced continued difficulties in growing its operations, became overburdened with debt and sought the assistance of outside consultants as well as strategic relationships to boost the company. In May, 1999, ITS Texas and Unifund America, Inc., a New York merchant banking firm specializing in strategic planning for companies such as ITS, agreed to form a strategic relationship. Unifund believed that a leaner company devoted to marketing and distribution might be a more successful venture. It also believed that it could help grow such a company by identifying and evaluating sensible business solutions as well as forming complementary strategic relationships. Unifund was only interested in a marketing company. On June 16, 1999, ITS Texas and Unifund America, Inc. formalized their relationship. ITS Texas would issue a marketing agreement to a newly formed entity, which would become our company. In consideration of being granted the exclusive marketing agreement, the parties agreed that the new company would issue 210,000 of our shares of common stock to ITS Texas as follows: 17,000 shares of our common stock to the holders of ITS Texas and 193,000 shares of our common stock to Carey Birmingham. It was also agreed that Carey Birmingham would be our president and director. The parties agreed that Unifund America's chief executive officer, Scott Barter, would be appointed to our board of directors and that Unifund would own a controlling block of the shares. As additional consideration for the exclusive marketing agreement, Unifund agreed that it would provide management, business and marketing advice to the newly formed entity and to fund legal, accounting and operating expenses in connection with the establishment of our business. Unifund paid $25,000 to the law firm of Kaplan Gottbetter & Levenson, LLP for legal services in connection with the preparation of our registration statement and received 250,000 shares of common stock from the company. In addition, Unifund has paid the company approximately $80,000 as of the date of this registration statement which was utilized for operations. Management of the to-be-formed entity wanted only to be a marketing company and not a company involved in the development or manufacture of the circuit board products. In light of this, ITS Texas was reorganized its operations. On June 16, 1999, it transferred all of its technology back to Pensar Technologies, LLC, which had been dormant but in good standing since the transfer of assets in 1997. In exchange for the technology, Pensar assumed all of the assets and liabilities of ITS Texas. Assets of Pensar at the time of transfer included completed inventory, comprised of un assembled kits for approximately 14 2000S, 2100 and 1000S units as well as miscellaneous parts. Simultaneously with the transfer of assets and liabilities between Pensar and ITS Texas in 1999, the two companies agreed to execute a distributorship agreement that allowed ITS Texas the exclusive worldwide right to market and distribute Pensar test systems for a period of 10 years, with options to renew. On May 1, 2002, this distributorship agreement was cancelled and an asset purchase agreement was entered into between International Tests Systems, Inc. and Pensar whereby International Test Systems acquired all of the assets and certain and of the liabilities of Pensar in consideration for 300,000 shares of International Test Systems' common stock valued at $.40 per share or $120,000 And the assumption by International Test Systems of Pensar liabilities in the Amount of $30,835. Therefore, the transaction was valued at $120,000. During the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002 we sold a total of 4 Units, consisting of a blend of 2000S base Systems and 2100 Scanner Expansions. From the date the first test system was sold in October 1994 through December 31, 2002, a total of 151 units have been sold to a total of 60 customers in the U.S., Japan, China, Egypt, Singapore, Jamaica, Mexico, Brazil, Turkey, India and Canada. A partial list of end-use customer list includes: ========================================================================= ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Company Location No. of Systems ========================================================================= NCR Corporation Bethlehem, PA 1 IBM Corporation San Jose, CA 2 Sony Microelectronics San Antonio, TX 2 Cisco Systems San Jose, CA 2 Solectron Corp. Austin, TX 4 SMT Centre Austin, TX 6 Harris corporation San Antonio, TX 6 US Air Force San Antonio 10 US Army Mannheim, Germany 1 ICL/Fujitsu Dallas, TX 3 Immigration Naturalization Service Various Location in Texas 3 Radian Corporation Austin, TX 2 Paradigm Corp. San Antonio, TX 2 Finetest San Jose, CA 2 Vanco PTE Singapore 1 Fastar, Ltd. Dallas, TX 1 Primetech Electronics Quebec, Canada 1 Colin Medical Instruments San Antonio, TX 1 Matrix Components Austin, TX 2 Tanisys Corporation Austin, TX 2 EMSCO Cairo, Egypt 1 Electronic Resources, Int'l Des Moines, IA 2 Digital Repair Corp. San Antonio 1 Note: Because this offering focuses on details concerning the company rather than the industry in which the company operates or will operate, potential investors may wish to conduct their own separate investigation of the company's industry to obtain broader insight in assessing the company's prospects.
SB-1/A18th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 18th
Recent Events Messrs. Birmingham and Barter each received $7,500 in February 2003 as non-refundable fees for the execution of a Letter of Intent with a third party to purchase shares from Messrs. Birmingham and Barter for $.26 per share. The Letter of Intent expired by its terms and the fees were retained by both of Messrs. Birmingham and Barter as liquidated damages. In March 2003, each of Messrs. Birmingham and Barter received approximately $30,000 from the same third party as mentioned above, via their agent in connection with continued negotiations between the parties. In addition to negotiations to acquire shares of company common stock from each of Messrs. Birmingham and Barter, the third party was negotiating to acquire a controlling interest in the company. As of April 4, 2003, the company is still in negotiations to sell a controlling interest and Messrs. Birmingham and Barter believe they have reached an agreement to sell an aggregate of 626,000 shares under the terms of the Letter of Intent. In the event that Messrs. Birmingham and Barter are unable to reach an agreement to sell their shares, it is likely that the third party will seek the return of advances of approximately $30,000 made to each of Messrs. Birmingham and Barter. Management's Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements. This prospectus contains forward looking statements relating to our company's future economic performance, plans and objectives of management for future operations, projections of revenue mix and other financial items that are based on the beliefs of, as well as assumptions made by and information currently known to, our management. The words "expects, intends, believes, anticipates, may, could, should" and similar expressions and variations thereof are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The cautionary statements set forth in this section are intended to emphasize that actual results may differ materially from those contained in any forward looking statement. Development Activities. Our company has been an early growth stage enterprise since 1995. We are an early growth stage company that was organized to exclusively market and sell a component-level printed circuit board tester whose principal customers use the tester to analyze, repair, and service printed circuit boards with components attached. During our development, our management devoted the majority of their efforts to creating and initiating the marketing program, and sourcing working capital to engage in any profitable business activity and provided the initial working capital through the sale of shares of common stock. Our company has not yet generated sufficient revenues during its operating history to fund its ongoing operating expenses, or entirely fund its marketing activities. There can be no assurance that the manufacturer's products will be accepted in the marketplace or that our company's sales efforts will provide a profitable path for us. Results of Operations Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2001 Revenue from equipment sales and sales commissions increased $3,859 to $9,534 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002 compared to sales of $5,675 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2001. Management believes that the small amount of sales is largely attributable to management's efforts to complete the company's public offering which has resulted in less time spent by management marketing the company's products. In addition, the Company's lack of funds has contributed to its inability to market and sell the company's products.
SB-1/A19th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 19th
General and administrative expenses increased $5,916 or 4% from $154,907 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2001 to $160,823 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. The increase in general and administrative expenses is largely due to professional fees paid to accountants and lawyers in connection with the company's efforts to become a publicly-traded entity. Another significant general and administrative expense included consulting expenses. Net loss increased $142,673, or 96% from $(149,232) for the twelve months ended December 31, 2001 to $(291,905) for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. The increase in net loss was largely due to the impairment loss of $135,169 on goodwill recorded in the purchase of Pensar. Effects of Pensar Acquisition on Company's Future Operations To the extent that the company has acquired 100% of Pensar, this may have a positive effect through the sale of certain inventory that currently exists and was acquired from Pensar. We do not believe that the acquisition of Pensar will have a significant impact on our future operations, cash flow, and liquidity.
SB-1/A20th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 20th
The PC market and its related electronics are a small part of our business. Nevertheless, our business has been adversely impacted by the slowdown in economies worldwide. We have also been adversely affected by the cyclical nature of the electronics and semiconductor industries, which experience recurring periods of oversupply of products and equipment of the type our equipment can test and repair. These factors have resulted in a downturn in the demand for our products. During the first and second quarters of 2002, orders declined significantly. Our experience in previous downturns has been that orders improve as our customers' capital expenditures increase. At present, however, we cannot say how long the current downturn will last or when the situation will improve. In the absence of significant improvement, orders could remain low or decline further. Liquidity And Capital Resources. Overview The Company's cash position was $0 at December 31, 2002. Working capital at December 31, 2002 was negative at $(101,720). To date, we have not generated significant revenues as we have generated revenues of $5,675 for the year ended December 31, 2001 and $9,534 for the year ended December 31, 2002. We have not been profitable since inception, we may incur additional operating losses in the future, and may require additional financing to continue the development and commercialization of our technology. While we expect to generate revenues from the sale of products in the near future, we may enter into licensing or other agreements with marketing and distribution partners that may result in license fees, revenues from contract research, or other related revenue. As of April 4, 2003 our principal commitments consist of our agreement with Public Securities to raise funds in connection with this offering on a "best efforts" basis as well as a $75,000 revolving line of credit with BFP Texas, of which we have $8,000 available for borrowing. However, there is no assurance that Public Securities will be successful in raising us any capital. Although we have no material commitments for capital expenditures, other than those mentioned above, we expect our capital requirements to increase significantly over the next several years as we increase advertising and direct marketing, increase sales and administration infrastructure and embark on developing in-house business capabilities and facilities. Our future liquidity and capital funding requirements will depend on numerous factors, including, but not limited to, the levels and costs of our research and development initiatives and the cost and timing of the expansion of our sales and marketing efforts. Our current cash forecasts indicate that there will be negative cash flow from operations for the foreseeable future. We believe that proceeds from this offering, assuming we raise at least $125,000, will be sufficient to meet our anticipated needs for working capital, capital expenditures and business development for the next twelve months. We expect to utilize cash at an average rate of approximately $10,000 per month, or $120,000 for the next twelve months. Moreover, if we are successful in raising at least $125,000, Mr. Birmingham's 5- year employment contract will become effective and he will receive an annual salary of $25,000 for the first year, $55,000 for year two, $65,000 for year three, $75,000 for year four and $100,000 for year five. If we are unable to raise a minimum of $125,000 from this offering, we may be forced to curtail or cease our operations. Even if we are able to continue our operations, the failure to obtain financing could have a substantial adverse effect on our business and financial results. Although we have historically relied upon financing provided by our officers and directors to supplement our operations, they are not legally obligated to provide us with any additional funding in the future. We currently maintain a revolving line of credit with BFP Texas which bears interest at an annual rate of 8%. As of April 1, 2003, we owed BFP Texas approximately $67,000. Other than BFP Texas, we do not have any agreements for additional sources of financing. In the future, we may be required to seek additional capital by selling debt or equity securities, curtailing operations, selling assets, or otherwise be required to bring cash flows in balance when it approaches a condition of cash insufficiency. The sale of additional equity securities, if accomplished, may result in dilution to our shareholders. We cannot assure you, however, that financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, or at all. As of December 31, 2002, we had a tax loss carry-forward of approximately $85,000 to off-set future taxable income. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to take advantage of any or all of such tax loss carry-forward, if at all, in future fiscal years. Year Ended December 31, 2002 Net cash used in operating activities was $(17,758) for the year ended December 31, 2002, which reflected a net loss of $(291,905), stock issued for services of $108,800, and an impairment of goodwill associated with the purchase of Pensar of $135,169. Net cash provided by financing activities was $61,107 for the year ended December 31, 2002, which reflected shareholder contributions of $6,900 and proceeds from a note payable to a related party of $54,750. Cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2002 was $(43,520) from an increase in deferred offering costs of ($43,673) and $153 cash received in the purchase of Pensar.
SB-1/A21st Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 21st
Year Ended December 31, 2001 Net cash used in operating activities was $(3,242) for the year ended December 31, 2001, reflecting a net loss of $(149,232) and stock issued for services of $139,400. Cash used in investing activities was ($17,005) for the year ended December 31, 2001 due to an increase in deferred offering costs. Cash provided by financing activities was $15,073 for the year ended December 31, 2001 reflecting shareholder contributions of 15,073. Events Or Milestones EVENTS OR MILESTONES Printed circuits boards are found virtually every type of electronic instrument and product manufactured today. Every new product and every existing product that contains a printed circuit board represents an application or product opportunity for our test systems. While no assurance can be given, we believe that printed circuit boards will remain a mainstay in the electronics industry. Our products test the individual components on a printed circuit board based on voltage and current (V/I) signature analysis. This technology is time-tested and is a recognized generic means of testing throughout the electronics industry. While the CircuiTest 2000S and associated software uses new and innovative interpretations of the V/I, we believe that this basic method of testing will continue to be a standard far into the foreseeable future. We do not believe that this industry is as time sensitive as other high-technology industries, and, thus, we believe we have the time to plan, fund and scale up our business without losing a place in the market. Of course, the foothold that competitors have in the industry will be a barrier that we must pass.
SB-1/A22nd Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 22nd
[Enlarge/Download Table] EVENT METHOD OF DATE OR NUMBER OF MONTHS ACHIEVEMENT ESTIMATED AFTER RECEIPT OF PROCEEDS CASH WHEN EVENT SHOULD BE REQUIRED ACCOMPLISHED FOR SUCH EVENT Fund minimal operations Conduct this Immediately offering and sell $125,0000 after escrowed funds a minimum of 312,500 are released. shares Market products based Conduct this offering to Ongoing process which should upon obtain needed funds to pay commence within one month after existing technology. for direct mailings and $5,000 based receipt of funds in excess of other marketing efforts. Hire on sale of 125,000. Direct offering amount is marketing support and 312,500 received. Other forms of marketing establish relationships with shares and the retainment of marketing independent sales support staff can commence when contractors to market $235,625 - amounts in excess of $125,000 are products. Target $378,750 received. In addition, the president governmental and foreign based on and the directors will be compensated markets. raising from the offering proceeds to the between extent they engage in developing our $500,000 and business, which may include $750,000 marketing advice or activities. Seek product and Conduct this offering to Ongoing process which can technology opportunities obtain needed funds to hire $0 based on commence immediately after receipt which expand our a product developer and sale of of $125,000. Upon receipt of the business in both the area establish relationships with 312,500 maximum offering amount, we can of testing and trouble independent technology shares hire a product developer. The receipt shooting as well as other companies and developers. of amounts between these areas that will maximize $8,000 to breakpoints will enable us to pay our our value. $24,000 based president and on raising directors who shall engage in the between development of relationships with $ 500,000 and individuals and companies which can $750,000 provide us with improved and different technologies and products. Seek to establish strategic Conduct this offering to Ongoing process which can alliances that will maximize obtain needed funds to pay $2,000 based commence immediately after receipt our value. for the services of the on raising of $125,000. Upon receipt of president, the directors and $125,000 125,000, and upon the receipt of consultants to conduct due amounts between $500,000 and diligence on market needs $75,000 to 750,000, we can pay our president and opportunities for our $110,0000 and our directors who intend to company to increase its based on engage in the development of our value. raising business. The ability to complete between strategic alliances cannot be $500,000 and definitively timed and will depend on $750,000 opportunities which these individuals will continue to explore. Seek liquidity and growth Become listed on the over- $ 3,125 based Six months to one year initially and in the market place. the-counter bulletin board on raising then a continuing effort thereafter. and continue marketing $125,000 efforts. $50,000 to $65,000 based on raising between $500,000 and $750,000
SB-1/A23rd Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 23rd
Note: After reviewing the nature and timing of each event or milestone, potential investors should reflect upon whether achievement of each within the estimated time frame is realistic and should assess the consequences of delays or failure of achievement in making an investment decision. We cannot assure you that any, or all, of the events previously outlined can, or will, occur within the expected time frame. We have scaled back operating costs and will continue to do so until we receive an infusion of cash. If this offering is successful we will be able to market and sell our products and to develop and/or license new technology. We do not currently have any strategic alliances. In the past we were unable to generate enough capital from revenues to fully develop and retain the proper staff to market and support our products as well as to seek and exploit other market opportunities. While no assurances can be given, we believe that with proper funding, we will have the support to achieve our objectives. However, we believe that the achievement of these goals involves a process cannot necessarily be defined by a list of separately identifiable date-certain milestones. To make our company profitable, we estimate we will require a minimum of $125,000 in capital to be used over a 12-18 month period for such costs as marketing and sales staff salaries and support, as well as advertising, trade show participation and reimbursement of costs to subcontracted distributors, if any. In the event we encounter delays in the successful marketing of our products, we can expect consequences which include reduction in advertising expenditures, participation in tradeshows and possibly layoff of marketing and sales staff and support, in that order. Directors, Officers And Key Personnel Of The Company. The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each director and executive officer of International Test Systems as follows: Name Age Title ---- --- ----- Carey Birmingham 47 President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director Henrik Youval Krigel 48 Director Alex H. Yount 49 Director The directors have been elected by the present shareholders and shall serve for terms of one year, or until their successors are elected and have qualified. Officers are appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of, the board of directors, absent any employment agreement. There are no family relationships among the company's officers and directors.
SB-1/A24th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 24th
Carey Birmingham has served as our President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer And Director since the Company was reincorporated in Delaware in 1999. Since 1996, Mr. Birmingham has served as chairman and president of ITS Texas, as well as Pensar Technologies LLC. Mr. Birmingham was responsible for the formation and management of ITS Texas in September 1996, which was a development stage company. Prior to the formation of ITS Texas, Mr. Birmingham was also responsible for the formation of Pensar Technologies LLC in 1995, a start-up company created to design and market the technology known as the 2000S In-Circuit Test System. Mr. Birmingham is responsible for long-term strategic planning and all day-to-day administrative activities, including marketing, finance, profit and loss responsibility, building strategic alliances and developing sales. During the past 14 years, in addition to his work in venture capital and individual investments, Mr. Birmingham had served in various capacities. From March 1982 through April 1984, Mr. Birmingham served as Asset Manager and Sr. Asset Manager for New York Life Insurance. Mr. Birmingham served as a Vice President for Unicorp American Corporation and Executive Vice President for Unicorp Property Management, a company subsidiary, from May 1984 through November 1989. Mr. Birmingham served as a Portfolio Director for United Services Automobile Association (USAA) from 1990 through part of 1992. In addition, Mr. Birmingham served as a consultant for Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance and Mutual Benefit Life from 1992 through 1994. Mr. Birmingham has been responsible for the asset and property management of real estate portfolios valued in excess of $250 Million at New York Life, $300-$400 Million at Unicorp American, $200-$300 Million at USAA and approximately $300 -$400 million at Fidelity and Mutual Benefit Life. During his tenure with these companies, Mr. Birmingham generated gross sales proceeds of over $700 million from the sale of properties. Mr. Birmingham received a BA degree from New York University in 1980. Henrik Youval Krigel has served as our Director since June 1999. Since joining our company as a director in June 1999, Mr. Krigel has worked full time for Ktest International, LLC, a company unrelated to our company. Ktest designs and sells test equipment for the avionics wire harness repair market. Since June 1999, Mr. Krigel has spent less than 10 hours a month on ITS matters, although we share office space with his company and he is available to our company at any time for consultation or advice. Mr. Krigel, has spent over 25 years in electronics and 20 years in automated test equipment design, most recently as one of the founders of Protech, Inc., a company formed for the design and manufacture of large-scale functional testers, a technology Mr. Krigel developed. As co-designer of the CircuiTest systems, Mr. Krigel served as vice president of Pensar Technologies LLC from its inception in 1995 until the formation of ITS Texas in September 1996, at which time he resigned to become vice president of research and development for ITS Texas until June 1999. As vice president of ITS Texas, Mr. Krigel was responsible for creation, design and planning of new products for both Pensar Inc. and International Test Systems. In 1982, he attended the University of Texas at San Antonio, and from 1982 to 1983, San Antonio Community College, but has not yet received a formal degree in the United States. From 1967 to 1969, Mr. Krigel studied electronics at the Israeli Air Force Academy. Mr. Krigel then served for 10 and one-half years in the Israeli Air Force, achieving the rank of Chief Master Sergeant. Alex H. Yount has served as our Director since 2000. Mr. Yount spends approximately 8 hours per month on company business. Since January 2002, Mr. Yount has worked for Koontz McCombs Realty Services, Inc. as vice president of commercial real estate. From May 1994 through December 2001, Mr. Yount served as vice president of Cavender & Hill Properties, Inc. of San Antonio Texas. Cavender & Hill is a commercial real estate sales and leasing company. Between May 1994 and December 1998, Mr. Yount served as Cavender & Hill's vice president of property management where he was in charge of all property management activities for the company and headed a staff of six employees. From January 1999 to the present, Mr. Yount has served as Cavender & Hill's vice president of office buildings division. He has assumed a newly created position with Cavender & Hill where he is in charge of office building leasing and investment sales. In 1976, Mr. Yount received his bachelor's degree in design from the University of Florida, School of Design. In July 1980, Mr. Yount attended courses for the Institute of Real Estate Management in attainment of Certified Property Manager (CPM(C)) designation. In July 1997, he attended courses with the Institute of Real Estate Management in Chicago Illinois in attainment of a certified commercial investment member (CCIM) designation. Mr. Yount is a national and local member of the Institute of Real Estate Management, a national and local member of the CCIM Institute, a member of the San Antonio Board of Realtors and a national and local member of the Building Owners & Managers Association.
SB-1/A25th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 25th
None of the company's officers or directors has ever worked for or managed a company in the same business as the company. None of the officers, directors, key personnel or principal stockholders are related by blood or marriage. The board of directors has authority to authorize and approve company transactions involving stock purchase agreements, stock options, and warrants without shareholder approval. Therefore, shareholders are very reliant on the board of directors to make good business decisions as the shareholders have no control over such matters. Director compensation will be allocated in accordance with a director's level of engagement with the company and at the discretion of the board of directors. Note: After reviewing the information concerning the background of the company's Officers, Directors and other key personnel, potential investors should consider whether or not these persons have adequate background and experience to develop and operate this company and to make it successful. In this regard, the experience and ability of management are often considered the most significant factors in the success of a business. Employment Agreements In May 2002, we entered into a five year employment agreement with Carey Birmingham to serve as our President and Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Birmingham receives an annual salary upon the company raising a minimum of $125,000 of $25,000 and an annual salary of $45,000 in the event the company raises a minimum of $500,000. Thereafter, Mr. Birmingham's salary will be as follows: Year 2-$55,000, Year 3-$65,000, Year 4-$75,000 and Year 5-$100,000. In the near future, the company plans to maintain a $250,000 life insurance policy on the life of Mr. Birmingham which is anticipated to remain in effect as long as he is employed by the company. In the event Mr. Birmingham's employment is terminated with or without cause, Mr. Birmingham shall be entitled to receive as severance pay, an amount equal to 12 months of salary, rights to any options received whether vested or not, and health and life insurance under the same terms as if the agreement had not been terminated. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners And Management The following tables set forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock prior to the offering, and after the offering of such shares assuming the sale of 312,500 shares and 1,250,000 shares, respectively by our officers, directors, principal owners of five percent (5%) or more of our common stock, and all officers and directors as a group. [Download Table] Name and address Beneficially Owned Beneficially Owned Of Beneficial Owner(1) Prior to Offering After Offering 312,500 Shares 1,250,000 Shares Shares Percent Percent Percent Unifund Financial Group, Inc. 571,500 27.0% 23.5% 17.0% R. Scott Barter (2) 846,500 40.0% 34.9% 25.1% Carey Birmingham (3)(4)(5)1,074,500 50.8% 44.2% 31.9% Alex H. Yount (3) 70,000 3.3% 2.9% 2.1% H. Youval Krigel (3) 70,000 3.3% 2.9% 2.1% Pensar 300,000 14.2% 12.4% 8.9% BFP Texas(5) 300,000 14.2% 12.4% 8.9% All officers and directors as a group (3 persons) 1,214,500 57.4% 50.0% 36.1% Assumes that none of the warrants are exercised.
SB-1/A26th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 26th
<FN> (1) Each person or entity has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown. (2) Includes 571,500 shares owned of record by Unifund Financial Group which is controlled by Mr. Barter, and 275,000 shares individually owned by Mr. Barter . (3) The business address of such individual is the same as International Test Systems address. (4) Includes 300,000 shares held of record by Pensar, of which Mr. Birmingham is an affiliate, 25,000 shares held of record by Frances M. Birmingham, Mr. Birmingham's wife, and 5,000 shares held of record by Caitlin Birmingham, Mr. Birmingham's daughter. (5) Includes 300,000 held of record by Pensar through BFP Texas and Mr. Birmingham which are affiliates of Pensar and Mr. Birmingham acts as co-trustee of the general partner of BFP Texas.
Management Compensation Carey Birmingham, our Chief Executive Officer and President received $0 during the year ended December 31, 2001, and $0 during the year ended December 31, 2002. During the year ended December 31, 2000, Youval Krigel received 25,000 shares of our common stock in consideration for services rendered as a director which the company valued at $10,000. During the year ended December 31, 2001, Alex Yount received 70,000 shares of common stock which were valued at $28,000 and Youval Krigel received 34,200 shares which were valued at $13,680. In addition, Carey Birmingham received 228,500 shares during the year ended December 31, 2001which were valued at $91,400. In May 2002, we entered into a five year employment agreement with Carey Birmingham to serve as our President and Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Birmingham receives an annual salary upon the company raising a minimum of $125,000 of $25,000 and $45,000 in the event the company raises a minimum of $500,000 in this offering. Thereafter, Mr. Birmingham's salary will be as follows: Year 2-$55,000, Year 3-$65,000, Year 4-$75,000 and Year 5-$100,000. The company is highly dependent on the services of Mr. Birmingham who has entered into an employment agreement with the company which provides that Mr. Birmingham will not compete with the company for twelve months upon termination of the agreement. Note: after reviewing the above, potential investors should consider whether or not the compensation to Mr. Birmingham and other key personnel directly or indirectly, is reasonable in view of the present stage of the company's development. Selling Shareholders Not applicable Certain Transactions Carey Birmingham, Youval Krigel and Raphael Sonsino were founding shareholders of International Test Systems, (Texas) prior to our reorganization in Delaware in September 1999.
SB-1/A27th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 27th
During the first quarter of 1997 in a private sale pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, Stephen G. Birmingham, Dr. Ed Lahniers and Andree Sonsino purchased shares in ITS Texas for a capital investment of $50,000, $5,000 and $2,000, respectively. Upon formation of our company, all holders exchanged all of their shares in ITS Texas for shares in our company. Stephen G. Birmingham is the father of Carey Birmingham, the president of our company. Carey Birmingham is chairman and president of our company as well as President of Pensar LLC. On June 16, 1999, ITS Texas transferred all of its technology to Pensar LLC in exchange for which Pensar LLC assumed all of the liabilities of ITS Texas. On June 19, 1999, Pensar LLC and ITS Texas entered into a renewable, ten-year distribution agreement granting ITS Texas the exclusive, worldwide right to market, sell and distribute products based on Pensar technology. Pensar owned 45.625% of the total shares of ITS Texas on June 16, 1999. Mr. Carey Birmingham was president and a director of both Pensar and ITS Texas during the negotiation of the distributor agreement with Pensar. He was at such time owner of 1,262,156 units, or 50.49% of Pensar and the majority shareholder in Pensar. Our company was re-organized in Delaware in September 1999 in anticipation of completing a public offering of our stock. On that same date, ITS Texas assigned us the distribution agreement with Pensar LLC, and ITS Texas ceased all day-to-day business. On April 15, 2000, we amended the compensation section of our distribution agreement with Pensar. Although Mr. Birmingham was president and a director of ITS Texas and Pensar during 1999, ITS Texas, Pensar and ITS Delaware, had different third party directors who gave final approval of the distribution agreement and our efforts to obtain additional capital in the public markets. In addition to Mr. Birmingham, the other majority shareholder approving the Pensar exchange and distribution agreements was the Birmingham Family Partnership, Ltd., (re-named BFP Texas, Ltd. in 2001). Mr. Birmingham served (and continues to serve) as co-trustee of the General Partner of BFP, Texas, Ltd., and has general authority over the investment business of BFP Texas, Ltd. By virtue of a Trust Agreement, Mr. Birmingham was, at the time, the beneficiary of less than a 5% Limited Partnership interest in BFP, Texas, Ltd. As of June 30, 2002, Mr. Birmingham is the beneficiary of a 5.2286% Limited Partnership interest in BFP Texas, Ltd. We entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Pensar in May 2002, which superceded the distribution agreement. Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, we acquired all of the assets of Pensar in consideration for 300,000 shares of our stock and the assumption of liabilities of Pensar in the amount of $30,835. At the time of the Asset Purchase Agreement between Pensar and our company, Mr. Birmingham owned 1,262,156 units in Pensar, or 50.49% of Pensar. BFP Texas, Ltd., (formerly Birmingham Family Partnership, Ltd.), owned 737,844 units of Pensar, or 29.51%. By virtue of a Trust Agreement, Mr. Birmingham is the beneficiary of a 5.2286% Limited Partnership interest in BFP, Texas, Ltd. Mr. Birmingham also serves as co-trustee of the General Partner of BFP Texas, Ltd., and has general authority over the investment business of BFP Texas, Ltd. In August 2002 Mr. Birmingham gifted 162,156 of his units in Pensar to his wife for no consideration. This left Mr. Birmingham with 1,100,000 units, or a 44% interest, in Pensar. Also in August 2002, Mr. Birmingham transferred a total of 127,000 shares of his stock in our company in a series of transactions described in more detail below. Mr. Birmingham transferred 25,000 shares to Frances M. Birmingham, his wife, and 5,000 shares to Caitlin Birmingham, his daughter. Mr. Birmingham is the beneficial owner of the 30,000 shares discussed in the sentence above. In October 2002, Mr. Birmingham gifted 500 shares of his stock to each of Francis W. White, Christopher Ullman, Hans Hodell and Brian Harris.
SB-1/A28th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 28th
In December 2002, Mr. Birmingham transferred a total of 75,000 shares of his stock to R. Scott Barter in consideration for consulting services rendered to the company. Following the transfers by Mr. Birmingham, his direct ownership in our company as of December 31, 2002 is 419,500 shares of common stock. As a result of his ownership in Pensar as well as his status as an affiliate, Mr. Birmingham is the beneficial owner of all 300,000 shares of our company owned by Pensar, in addition to the shares he already owns directly in our company. Except for its ownership interest in Pensar, BFP Texas, Ltd. owns no shares directly in our company. By nature of its ownership in Pensar, BFP Texas, Ltd. is the beneficial owner of all 300,000 shares of our company. Therefore, by virtue of his role as co-trustee of the General Partners of BFP Texas, Mr. Birmingham owns a beneficial interest in our company of 300,000 shares through BFP Texas. Therefore, by virtue of his direct ownership of shares and shares held by wife and daughter, his ownership in Pensar, and his Limited Partnership interest in BFP Texas, Mr. Birmingham held a total beneficial interest of 1,049,500 shares of our company as of December 31, 2002. The following is a description of individual stock transactions from September 1999 through March 2003: Unifund Financial Group, Inc. UNIFUND Unifund Financial Group, Inc. purchased 574,000 newly issued shares of our company from June through November 1999 for $57,400, or $.10 per share. Unifund's chief executive officer, Scott Barter, was appointed to our board of directors. Mr. Barter resigned from our board of directors on April 30, 2001. Unifund was awarded an additional 196,000 newly issued shares in September 1999, valued at $78,400, or $.40 per share, in consideration for providing management, business and marketing advice and to fund certain legal and accounting expenses in connection with the reorganization of our business. Unifund purchased 250,000 newly issued shares on February 2, 2000 for $25,000, or $.10 per share. Unifund transferred 70,000 of its own shares, valued at $28,000, or $.40 per share, in July 2001 to Alex Yount in consideration for Mr. Yount becoming a company director of our company. Alex Yount became our director on May 1, 2001. Unifund transferred 228,500 of its own shares, valued at $91,400, or $.40 per share, in July 2001 to Carey Birmingham in consideration for contributions to our company as an officer and director and to entice Mr. Birmingham to continue as an officer and director. Unifund returned for cancellation 100,000 of its own shares, valued at $40,000, or $.40 per share, in May 2002 in connection with the Asset Purchase Agreement between the company and Pensar. Unifund transferred 25,000 of its own shares, valued at $10,000, or $. 40 per share, in June 2002 to Warren Kirshenbaum in consideration for future legal services to be provided upon our becoming a publicly traded company. Subsequently, in March 2003, these shares were returned to Unifund by Mr. Kirshenbaum. Unifund transferred 25,000 of its own shares, valued at $10,000, or $.40 per share, in June 2002 to Richard Cohen in anticipation of providing future management and financial consulting services upon our becoming a publicly traded company. Unifund transferred 25,000 of its own shares, valued at $10,000, or $.40 per share, in June 2002 to Wayne Brannan in consideration for providing future management and financial consulting services upon our becoming a publicly traded company. These transactions leave Unifund with total shares of 571,500 shares of our company as of March 31, 2003. Carey Birmingham, Our President and Director CAREY G. BIRMINGHAM, DIRECTOR, PRESIDENT AND CEO Carey Birmingham was awarded 193,000 newly issued shares, valued at $77,200, or $.40 per share, in December 1999 in lieu of payment for his services as a chief executive officer and director for the year ended 1999. Mr. Birmingham purchased an additional 250,000 newly issued shares of our company for $25,000, or $.10 per share in February 2000. Mr. Birmingham was awarded an additional 50,000 newly issued shares of our company valued at $20,000, or $.40 per share in December 2000 in lieu of payment for his services as a chief executive officer and director for the year ended 2000. Mr. Birmingham received 228,500 transferred shares, valued at $91,400, or $.40 per share from Unifund Financial Group in July 2001 in lieu of payment for his services as a chief executive officer and director and to entice him to remain as CEO of our company. Mr. Birmingham returned for cancellation 100,000 of his own shares, valued at $40,000, or $.40 per share, in May 2002 in connection with the Asset Purchase Agreement between the company and Pensar Technologies. Mr. Birmingham transferred 25,000 of his own shares, valued at $10,000, or $.40 per share, in June 2002 to Warren Kirshenbaum in consideration for providing future legal services upon our becoming a publicly traded company. Subsequently, in March 2003, these shares were returned to Mr. Birmingham by Mr. Kirshenbaum. Mr. Birmingham transferred 25,000 of his own shares, valued at $10,000, or $.40 per share, in June 2002 to Richard Cohen in consideration for providing future management and financial consulting services upon our becoming a publicly traded company. Mr. Birmingham transferred 25,000 of his own shares, valued at $10,000, or $.40 per share, in June 2002 to Wayne Brannan in consideration for providing future management and financial consulting services upon our becoming a publicly traded company. In August 2002, Mr. Birmingham gifted 50,000 of his own shares to the following individuals: Frances M. Birmingham received 25,000 shares. David W. Mooney received 10,000 shares. Jay Alkire received 10,000 shares. Caitlin Birmingham received 5,000 shares.
SB-1/A29th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 29th
In October 2002, Mr. Birmingham gifted 2,000 of his own shares to the following individuals: Frank W. White received 500 shares Christopher Ullman received 500 shares Hans Hodell received 500 shares Brian Harris received 500 shares In December 2002, Mr. Birmingham transferred a total of 75,000 shares of his stock to R. Scott Barter in consideration for consulting services rendered to the company. These transactions leave Mr. Birmingham owning 444,500 shares directly, and 30,000 shares through family members as of December 31, 2002. However, by virtue of his direct ownership of shares in our company, his ownership through family members, his ownership in Pensar, and his Limited Partnership interest in BFP, Texas, Mr. Birmingham holds a total beneficial interest of 1,049,500 shares of our company as of March 31, 2003 Directors of the Company. H. YOUVAL KRIGEL, DIRECTOR H. Youval Krigel was awarded 803 shares of our common stock in exchange for his shares of ITS Texas and 9,997 newly issued shares, valued at $3,999 or $.40 per share, in December 1999 in lieu of payment for consulting and directorial services for the year ended 1999. Mr. Krigel was awarded an additional 25,000 newly issued shares of our company valued at $10,000, or $.40 per share, in December 2000 in lieu of payment for his services as director for the year ended 2000. Mr. Krigel was awarded 34,200 newly issued shares, valued at $13,680, or $.40 per share, in July 2001 in lieu of payment for his services as a director and to entice him to remain a director of our company. These transactions leave Mr. Krigel with total shares of 70,000 shares of our company as of October 1, 2002. H. ALEX YOUNT, DIRECTOR H. Alex Yount received 70,000 shares, valued at $28,000, or $.40 per share, transferred from Unifund Financial Group in July 2001 in lieu of payment for his services as a director of our company. Mr. Yount became a Director in May 2001 and remains on our board. Mr. Yount personally, therefore, owns 70,000 shares of our company. Individual Shareholders and companies other than Directors: Scott Barter received 150,000 shares in remuneration for his directorial function and consulting services at the end of 1999. These shares were valued at $.40 per share, or $60,000. In July 2001, Mr. Barter received an additional 50,000 shares for directorial and consulting services valued at $20,000 or $.40 per share. In December 2002 Mr. Barter received an additional 75,000 shares from Carey Birmingham in recognition of his consulting services during 2002 which were valued at $30,000 or $.40 per share. Mr. Barter personally, therefore, owns 275,000 shares of our company. Sheila Corvino was awarded 50,000 newly issued shares valued at $20,000, or $.40 per share, in September 1999 for legal services provided to our company. Services anticipated by the delivery of these shares were deemed never received by the company and the shares were cancelled in March 2003.
SB-1/A30th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 30th
Brad Smith was awarded 50,000 newly issued shares valued at $20,000, or $.40 share, in September 1999 for consulting services. Elizabeth Acton was awarded 5,000 newly issued shares, valued at $2,000, or $.40 per share, in September 1999 for providing administrative services to the company. Ms. Acton was also awarded an 15,800 shares, valued at $6,320, or $.40 per share, in July 2001 for providing additional administrative services to our company. Ms. Acton therefore owns a total of 20,800 shares of our company. Harris Schiff was awarded 10,000 newly issued shares, valued at $4,000, or $.40 per share, in September 1999 for providing word processing and management information services to the company. Alan Scott was awarded 5,000 newly issued shares, valued at $2,000 or $.40 per share, in September 1999 for providing legal services to the company. Stephen Birmingham received 146 shares in exchange for his shares of ITS Texas and was awarded 4,854 newly issued shares, valued at $1,942, in September 1999 in consideration for services rendered. Mr. S. Birmingham was awarded an additional 7,200 newly issued shares valued at $2,880, or $.40 per share, in May 2002 in consideration for services rendered. Mr. S. Birmingham, therefore, owns a total of 12,200 shares of our company. Stephen Birmingham is the father of Carey Birmingham, our President and CEO. Dr. Ed Lahniers received 15 shares in exchange for his shares of ITS Texas and was awarded 485 newly issued shares, valued at $194, in September 1999 in consideration for services rendered. Dr. Lahniers was awarded an additional 7,200 newly issued shares valued at $2,880, or $.40 per share, in May 2002 in consideration for services rendered. Dr. Lahniers, therefore, owns a total of 7,700 shares of our company. B. Raphael Sonsino received 300 newly issued shares in exchange for his shares of ITS Texas. Mr. Sonsino was awarded an additional 5,300 newly issued shares valued at $2,120, or $.40 per share, in May 2002 in consideration for services rendered. Mr. Sonsino, therefore, owns a total of 5,600 shares of our company. Andree Sonsino received 6 shares of company common stock in consideration for his shares of ITS Texas and Mr. Sonsino was awarded 394 newly issued shares, valued at $158, in September 1999 in consideration for services rendered. Ms. Sonsino was awarded an additional 5,300 newly issued shares valued at $2,120, or $.40 per share, in May 2002 in consideration for services rendered. Ms. Sonsino, therefore, owns a total of 5,700 shares of our company. Pensar Technologies, LLC received 300,000 shares of our company valued at $120,000, OR $.40 per share in May 2002 as part consideration for the Asset Purchase Agreement described above. David M. Loev, Attorney at Law formerly of Vanderkam & Sanders, was awarded 100,000 newly issued shares valued at $40,000, or $.40 per share, in May 2002, in consideration for legal services rendered. Warren Kirshenbaum received 50,000 transferred shares valued at $20,000, or $.40 per share, equally from Unifund and Carey Birmingham in June 2002 in anticipation of providing future legal services upon our becoming a publicly traded company. These shares were returned to Unifund and Mr. Birmingham in March 2003. Richard Cohen received 50,000 transferred shares valued at $20,000, or $.40 per share, equally from Unifund and Carey Birmingham in June 2002 in anticipation of providing future management and financial consulting services upon our becoming a publicly traded company.
SB-1/A31st Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 31st
Wayne Brannan received 50,000 shares valued at $20,000, or $.40 per share, equally from Unifund and Carey Birmingham in June 2002 in anticipation of providing future management and financial consulting services upon our becoming a publicly traded company. Wayne Brannan received an additional 16,000 shares of newly issued stock in March 2003, valued at $6,400, or $.40 per share, for consulting services. This leaves Mr. Brannan with 66,000 shares of our company as of March 30, 2003. Other Financial Relationships between parties: From March 2002 through March 2003, BFP Texas, Ltd., (formerly the Birmingham Family Partnership, Ltd.) loaned the company $60,500 for legal and accounting services in connection with the preparation of this registration statement. These funds were received from BFP Texas, Ltd. under the terms of a revolving line of credit in the amount of $25,000. The line of credit was increased to $40,000 in August 2002,and again to $75,000 in December 2002 and matures on December 31, 2003, unless otherwise extended, and accrues interest at 8%. Mr. Birmingham serves as co-trustee of the General Partner of BFP, Texas, Ltd., and has general authority over the investment business of BFP Texas, Ltd. In addition, by virtue of a Trust Agreement, Mr. Birmingham is the beneficiary of a 5.2286% Limited Partnership interest in BFP, Texas, Ltd. In March 2003, Carey G. Birmingham loaned the company $20,000 for legal and accounting services in connection with the preparation of this registration statement. These funds were received from Mr. Birmingham under the terms of a revolving line of credit in the amount of $25,000 which matures on December 31, 2003, unless otherwise extended, and accrues interest at 8%. Stephen Birmingham, a shareholder in both Pensar and our company, is not affiliated with and holds no interest in BFP Texas, Ltd. Description of the Securities The securities offered for sale consist of: 1,250,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, which can be purchased for $0.40 per share, 1,250,000 class A redeemable warrants, which can be purchased for $0.10 per warrant, and which may be exercised for one share of common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share, and 1,250,000 class B redeemable warrants, which can be purchased for $0.10 per warrant and which may be exercised for one share of common stock at an exercise price of $4.50 per share. Our shares of common stock, our class A warrants and our class B warrants can be purchased separately in any amounts. We have reserved (1) 1,250,000 shares for issuance upon the exercise of our Class A redeemable warrants, and (2) 1,250,000 shares for issuance upon the exercise of our Class B redeemable warrants. Prior to this offering, there are no shares subject to issuance under presently outstanding stock purchase agreements, stock options, warrants or rights. Upon completion of this offering, a maximum of 1,250,000 shares will be issuable upon the exercise of Class A redeemable warrants and a maximum of 1,250,000 shares will be issuable upon the exercise of Class B redeemable warrants. In addition, up to 125,000 shares of common stock will be issuable to Public Securities, our underwriters, at $.56 per share and up to 125,000 warrants will be issued to Public Securities at an exercise price of $.14 per share, at the rate of one share and warrant for every 10 shares sold by Public Securities in this offering. There are no shares of common stock subject to issuance under existing stock purchase or option plans but not yet covered by outstanding purchase agreements, options or warrants. Stock purchase agreements, stock options, warrants, or rights may be approved by the company's Board of Directors without shareholder approval.
SB-1/A32nd Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 32nd
Common Stock Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of 50,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share, of which 2,380,000 shares are outstanding on the date hereof. Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on each matter submitted to a vote of stockholders. There is no cumulative voting for election of directors. Subject to the prior rights of any series of preferred stock which may be outstanding, if and when the board of directors declares dividends, holders of common stock are entitled to ratably receive, such dividends. Upon the liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the company, holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of liabilities and payment of accrued dividends and liquidation preferences on the preferred stock, if any. Common stock is not convertible, nor does it have any preemptive rights. The outstanding common stock is validly authorized and issued, fully paid, and nonassessable. FUTURE ISSUANCES OF OUR COMMON STOCK COULD DILUTE CURRENT SHAREHOLDERS AND ADVERSELY AFFECT THE MARKET IF IT DEVELOPS. We have the authority to issue up to 50,000,000 shares of common stock and to issue options and warrants to purchase shares of our common stock without stockholder approval. These future issuances could be at values substantially below the price paid for our common stock by our current shareholders. We will, at all times, reserve a sufficient number of authorized but unissued shares to accommodate the exercise of warrants. There is no assurance that any such exercise will take place and therefore no assurance that we will have available to us proceeds from an exercise. Preferred Stock Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $.001 per share. We have no present plans for the issuance of such preferred stock. The issuance of such preferred stock could adversely affect the rights of the holders of common stock and, therefore, reduce the value of the common stock. It is not possible to state the actual effect of the issuance of any shares of preferred stock on the rights of holders of the common stock until the board of directors determines the specific rights of the holders of the preferred stock. However, these effects might include: - restricting dividends on the common stock; - diluting the voting power of the common stock; - impairing the liquidation rights of the common stock; and - delaying or preventing a change in control of International Test Systems without further action by the stockholders. Warrants The company will offer class A redeemable warrants and class B redeemable warrants. The following discussion of certain terms and provisions of the warrants is qualified in its entirety by reference to the detailed provisions of each warrant and its related warrant agreement, the forms of which have been filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. Both the class A redeemable warrant and the class B redeemable warrant and the class A redeemable warrant agreement and class B redeemable warrant agreement can be inspected and copied by the public at the office of the SEC in Washington, D. C.
SB-1/A33rd Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 33rd
The Class A Redeemable Warrants The class A redeemable warrants will be issued in registered form pursuant to an agreement dated the date of this prospectus between the company and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company . One class A redeemable warrant represents the right of the registered holder to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share, subject to adjustment . The class A redeemable warrants are subject to adjustment in the purchase price and in the number of shares of common stock and/or other securities deliverable upon the exercise of the class A redeemable warrants in the event of certain stock dividends, stock splits, or similar transactions. The class A redeemable warrants may be exercised at any time after issuance, until the close of business on the third anniversary of the effective date of the offering. After the expiration date, the class A redeemable warrants become void and of no value. A holder of the class A redeemable warrants may exercise them at the office of the class A redeemable warrant agent, American Stock Transfer, by surrendering his or her warrant, and paying the exercise price for each warrant being exercised. No holder of the class A redeemable warrants will be entitled to vote or to receive dividends or be deemed the holder of shares of common stock for any purpose whatsoever until the class A redeemable warrants have been duly exercised and the exercise price paid in full. The class A redeemable warrants are subject to redemption by the company anytime on 30 days written notice at a redemption price of $.01 per warrant, provided that the trading price of the underlying common stock is at least 150% of the then current per share exercise price for 20 or more consecutive trading days. Upon notice of redemption, holders of the class A redeemable warrants will forfeit all rights there under except the rights to receive the $0.01 per share redemption price and to exercise them during the relevant 30-day notice period. If required, the company will file a post-effective amendment to the registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the common stock underlying the class A redeemable warrants prior to the exercise of the class A redeemable warrants and deliver a prospectus with respect to such common stock to all class A redeemable warrant holders as required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933. The Class B Redeemable Warrants The class B redeemable warrants will be issued in registered form pursuant to an agreement dated the date of this prospectus between the company and American Stock Transfer. One class B redeemable warrant represents the right of the registered holder to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, subject to adjustment. The class B redeemable warrants are subject to adjustment in the exercise price and in the number of shares of common stock and/or other securities deliverable upon the exercise of the class B redeemable warrants in the event of certain stock dividends, stock splits, or similar transactions. The class B redeemable warrants may be exercised at any time after issuance, until the close of business on the fifth anniversary of the effective date of this offering. After the expiration date, the class B redeemable warrants become void and of no value. A holder of the class B redeemable warrants may exercise them at the office of the class B redeemable warrant agent and, by surrendering his or her warrant, and paying the class B exercise price for each class B redeemable warrant being exercised. No holder of the class B redeemable warrants will be entitled to vote or to receive dividends or be deemed the holder of shares of common stock for any purpose whatsoever until the class B redeemable warrants have been duly exercised and the exercise price paid in full.
SB-1/A34th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 34th
The class B redeemable warrants are subject to redemption by the company anytime on 30 days written notice at a redemption price of $.01 per warrant, provided that the trading price of the underlying common stock is at least 150% of the then current per share exercise price for 20 or more consecutive trading days. Upon notice of redemption, holders of the class B redeemable warrants will forfeit all rights there under except the rights to receive the $0.01 per share redemption price and to exercise them during the relevant 30-day notice period. If required, the company will file a post-effective amendment to the registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the common stock underlying the class B redeemable warrants prior to the exercise of the class B redeemable warrants and deliver a prospectus with respect to such common stock to all class B redeemable warrant holders as required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933. TRANSFER AGENT American Stock Transfer serves as the transfer agent for our shares of common stock, class A warrants and our class B warrants. Dividend Policy We have not paid any cash dividends to date, there are no assets available to pay dividends, and we do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. We intend, in the short term at least, to use all available funds to develop our business. Legal Proceedings None EXPERTS The financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002 and the year ended December 31, 2001 included in this registration statement have been included herein in reliance upon the report of Malone & Bailey, PLLC, independent certified public accountants given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting. Legal Matters Certain legal matters in connection with the registration of the securities were passed upon by David M. Loev, Attorney at Law, counsel to the Company. David M. Loev was awarded 100,000 shares of our common stock in consideration of services rendered. Changes In And Disagreements With Accountants On Accounting And Financial Disclosure On January 8, 2002, the client-auditor relationship between International Test Systems, Inc., (ITS) and Thomas P. Monahan, CPA ("Monahan") ceased as Monahan was dismissed as the Company's auditor.
SB-1/A35th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 35th
To ITS's current Board of Directors, Monahan's report on his audit of ITS for the period from inception (May 13, 1999) through December 31, 1999 and the year ended December 31, 2000 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the audits of ITS's financial statements for the period from inception (May 13, 1999) through December 31, 1999 and the year ended December 31, 2000 and the interim period from December 31, 2000 to the date Monahan was dismissed, Monahan did not have any disagreements with ITS on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure which disagreement(s) if not resolved to the satisfaction of Monahan, would have caused Monahan to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement(s) in connection with its reports. The decision to change accountants was approved by ITS's Board of Directors. On March 18, 2002, ITS engaged Malone & Bailey, PLLC as its independent accountants for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001. During 2000, 2001 and the subsequent interim period in 2002 prior to engaging Malone & Bailey, ITS did not consult with Malone & Bailey regarding either (i) the application of accounting principals to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on ITS's financial statements; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject matter of a disagreement or a reportable event. Malone & Bailey, PLLC has reviewed the disclosure required by Item 304(a) before it was filed with the Commission and has been provided an opportunity to furnish ITS with a letter addressed to the Commission containing any new information, clarification of ITS's expression of its views, or the respects in which it does not agree with the statements made by ITS in response to Item 304(a). Malone & Bailey, PLLC did not furnish a letter to the Commission. ITS has requested that Monahan review the disclosure and to furnish ITS with a letter addressed to the Commission containing any new information, clarification of ITS's expression of its views, or the respect in which it does not agree with the statements made by ITS herein. Such letter has not been received from Monahan as of the date of this filing.
SB-1/A36th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 36th
Financial Statements INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT To the Board of Directors and Stockholders International Test Systems, Inc. San Antonio, Texas We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of International Test Systems, Inc., as of December 31, 2002 and the related consolidated statements of expenses, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the two years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of ITS's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of International Test Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 2002 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that ITS will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, ITS has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. MALONE & BAILEY, PLLC Houston, Texas www.malone-bailey.com February 11, 2003
SB-1/A37th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 37th
INTERNATIONAL TEST SYSTEMS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET As of December 31, 2002 ASSET Current Assets Accounts receivable, net of $0 allowance for doubtful accounts $ 273 Due from related parties 776 Inventory 2,798 ----------- Total Current Assets 3,847 Fixed assets, net of $26,308 accumulated depreciation 3,377 Deferred offering costs 183,710 ----------- Total Assets $ 190,934 =========== LIABILITIES Current Liabilities Accounts payable $ 48,422 Accrued expenses 1,589 Current portion of note payable 806 Note payable to a related party 54,750 ----------- Total Current Liabilities 105,567 Long term portion of note payable 868 ----------- Total Liabilities 106,435 ----------- Commitments STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Preferred stock, $.001 par, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding Common stock, $.001 par, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 2,150,000 shares outstanding 2,150 Additional paid in capital 1,539,441 Retained deficit (1,457,092) ----------- Total Stockholders' Equity 84,499 ----------- Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $ 190,934 =========== See accompanying summary of accounting policies and notes to financial statements.
SB-1/A38th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 38th
[Enlarge/Download Table] INTERNATIONAL TEST SYSTEMS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS For the Years Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 2002 2001 --------- --------- Revenue from equipment sales and sales commissions $9,534 $5,675 Selling expenses 236 General & administrative - paid in cash 52,023 15,507 - paid in stock 108,800 139,400 Depreciation 3,576 Impairment of goodwill 135,169 --------- --------- Loss From Operations (290,270) (149,232) Other Expense Interest expense ( 1,635) --------- --------- Net loss $(291,905) $(149,232) ========= ========= Basic and diluted net loss per common share $(.14) $(.08) Weighted average common shares outstanding 2,108,333 1,966,667 See accompanying summary of accounting policies and notes to financial statements.
SB-1/A39th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 39th
[Enlarge/Download Table] INTERNATIONAL TEST SYSTEMS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY For the Years Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 Common Stock Net Shares Amount Loss Totals ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- Balances, December 31, 2000 1,925,000 1,091,418 (1,015,955) 75,463 Shares returned to ITS (298,500) Shares issued for: - services 348,500 139,400 139,400 - deferred offering costs 50,000 20,000 20,000 Contribution to capital by shareholders 15,073 15,073 Net loss ( 149,232) (149,232) ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- Balances, December 31, 2001 2,025,000 1,265,891 (1,165,187) 100,704 Shares cancelled (100,000) Shares returned to ITS (447,000) Shares issued for: - purchase of Pensar 300,000 120,000 120,000 - services 272,000 108,800 108,800 - deferred offering costs 100,000 40,000 40,000 Contribution to capital by shareholder 6,900 6,900 Net loss ( 291,905) (291,905) ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- Balances, December 31, 2002 2,150,000 1,541,591 $(1,457,092) $84,499 ========== ========== ========= less: par value (2,150) ------------ Additional paid in capital $1,539,441 ============ See accompanying summary of accounting policies and notes to financial statements.
SB-1/A40th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 40th
[Enlarge/Download Table] INTERNATIONAL TEST SYSTEMS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS For the Years Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 2002 2001 --------- --------- CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net loss $(291,905) $(149,232) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities: Stock issued for services 108,800 139,400 Depreciation 3,576 Impairment of goodwill 135,169 Changes in: Accounts receivable 3,333 ( 30) Due from related parties 568 7,060 Inventory 1,308 Accounts payable 20,002 ( 440) Accrued expenses 1,391 --------- --------- NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES ( 17,758) ( 3,242) --------- --------- NET CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Cash received in purchase of Pensar 153 --------- NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES 153 --------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Shareholder contributions 6,900 15,073 Proceeds from note payable to a related party 54,750 Payments on note payable ( 543) Increase in deferred offering costs ( 43,673) (17,005) --------- --------- NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES 17,434 (1,932) --------- --------- NET CHANGE IN CASH ( 171) ( 5,174) CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD 171 5,345 --------- --------- CASH AT END OF PERIOD $0 $171 ========= ========= SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES: Interest paid $46 $0 Income taxes paid 0 0 NONCASH ACTIVITIES: Deferred offering costs paid with stock $40,000 $20,000 Purchase of Pensar Cash received 153 Accounts receivable 3,575 Due from related party 878 Inventory 4,107 Fixed assets, net 6,953 Accounts payable 28,420 Accrued expenses 198 Note payable 2,217 See accompanying summary of accounting policies and notes to financial statements.
SB-1/A41st Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 41st
INTERNATIONAL TEST SYSTEMS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Nature of Business. International Test Systems, Inc. ("ITS") was originally formed in Texas on September 20, 1996 to manufacture, market, sell and distribute a family of hardware and software products used to test and troubleshoot components on printed circuit boards. . This Texas corporation was dissolved in Texas in September 1999 and separately incorporated in Delaware with substantially identical ownership on September 20, 1999. See Note 3. ITS received commissions from the sale of equipment assembled by a sister company, Pensar, that is used for testing printed circuit boards used in personal computers until May 2002. In May 2002, ITS purchased all the assets and operations of Pensar. See Note 13. Principles of consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ITS and its subsidiary, Pensar Technologies, LLC ("Pensar"). All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Use of estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, as well as certain financial statement disclosures. While management believes that the estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the financial statements are appropriate, actual results could differ from these estimates. Cash Equivalents. Highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered cash equivalents. There was no cash or cash equivalents as of December 31, 2002. Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recognized when the earning process is complete and the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred to the customer, which is generally considered to have occurred upon shipment of the finished circuit board testing equipment. Software included in the circuit board testing equipment is considered part of the equipment and the related sale. At the point of sale, the software does not require significant modification, customization or subsequent customer support. Product pricing includes the relevant software. A standard 3-year commercial warranty applies, and warranty claims on the limited sales to date are non-existent. Management does not believe significant warranty claims will arise in the future. No upgrades or enhancements are considered likely to sold equipment. Inventories. Inventories are valued at the lower of first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost or market. Long-Lived Assets. Property and equipment are stated on the basis of historical cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. ITS reviews the carrying value of its long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the historical cost-carrying value of an asset may no longer be appropriate, or at least annually. ITS assesses recoverability of the carrying value of the asset by first estimating the future net cash flows expected to result from the reporting unit and comparing such with the asset carrying value. If the future net cash flows are less than the carrying value of the reporting unit, then the implied value of the goodwill is compared with its individual carrying value. If the implied value is less, an impairment loss is recorded equal to the difference between the asset's carrying value and fair value. An impairment loss of $135,169 was recognized in 2002 on goodwill recorded in the purchase of Pensar. See Note 13.
SB-1/A42nd Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 42nd
Income taxes. ITS recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to be recovered. ITS provides a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which it does not consider realization of such assets to be more likely than not. Basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share equals net earnings divided by weighted average shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share include the impact of common stock equivalents using the treasury stock method when the effect is dilutive. There were no common stock equivalents during 2002 or 2001. Recently issued accounting pronouncements. In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") released its Statement No. 141 "Business Combinations" which eliminated the pooling of interests method and further clarified the criteria to recognize intangible assets separately from goodwill. This statement is effective for any business purchased after June 30, 2001, and these provisions apply to the purchase of Pensar (see Note 13) in May 2002. In June 2001, FASB issued its Statement No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" which specified how identifiable intangible assets should be separated from goodwill, that goodwill will no longer be amortized, and how asset impairment should be accounted for. Following FASB 142, ITS recognized an impairment loss in 2002 of $135,169 on goodwill recorded in the purchase of Pensar. See Note 12. ITS does not expect the adoption of any other recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on ITS results of operations, financial position or cash flow. NOTE 2 - GOING CONCERN As shown in the accompanying financial statements, ITS has incurred recurring net losses, and has a working capital deficiency of $101,720 as of December 31, 2002. These conditions create an uncertainty as to ITS's ability to continue as a going concern. Management is trying to raise additional capital through sales of its common stock as well as seeking financing from third parties. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if ITS is unable to continue as a going concern. NOTE 3 - 1999 CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING On June 24, 1999, ITS Texas agreed with Unifund America, Inc. and Unifund Financial Group, Inc. (both referred to as "Unifund"), and Pensar to dissolve ITS Texas, create a new corporation in Delaware, and also simultaneously transfer all of the assets and liabilities of ITS Texas to Pensar. Pensar was formed as a Texas LLC in 1995 and was owned by 5 entities, two of which were Unifund and the president of ITS Texas ("Birmingham"). Immediately prior to this restructuring, Pensar owned 45% of ITS Texas. The agreement was consummated when ITS Delaware was created on September 20, 1999. Under this agreement, all of the shareholders in ITS Texas except Pensar exchanged their ITS Texas shares for shares in ITS Delaware. Pensar gave up all of its shares in ITS Texas for the assets and liabilities of ITS Texas. ITS Texas transferred its net assets of $7,274 to Pensar and ITS Texas was dissolved. Because the ITS Delaware shares were not issued pro-rata with the original ownership in ITS Texas, additional shares have been recorded as compensation expense of $6,292 based on the offering price of $.40 per share.
SB-1/A43rd Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 43rd
This agreement also called for the issuance of 770,000 shares and 193,000 shares of ITS stock to both Unifund and Birmingham, respectively, for compensation upon the formation of ITS. On September 20, 1999, in lieu of accepting these shares for compensation, Unifund purchased 574,000 shares of ITS Delaware for $31,200 cash and direct payment of third party vendor bills of $26,200. These payments were recorded as expenses. Since the price paid was below the offering price of $.40 per share, the $.30 difference has been recorded as a deemed dividend. Additional shares were issued in September 1999, as follows: - Unifund received 196,000 shares of ITS Delaware for consulting services valued at $.40 per share, or $78,400. - Unifund's CEO received 150,000 shares of ITS Delaware for director services valued at $.40 per share, or $60,000. - Birmingham received 193,000 shares of ITS Delaware for compensation valued at $.40 per share, or $77,200. - five third parties received 165,000 shares of ITS for services valued at $.40 per share, or $66,000. - two third parties received 55,000 shares of ITS for deferred offering costs valued at $.40 per share, or $22,000. Stock transactions concerning and around the June 1999 agreement that was consummated in September 1999 are as follows: [Download Table] Common Stock Shares Amount ---------- ---------- ITS Texas pre-dissolution balances 1,600,000 $651,400 ITS Texas is dissolved (1,600,000) Net assets to Pensar ( 7,274) ITS Delaware shares are issued to former ITS Texas shareholders 1,270 0 Compensation expense due to disproportionate issue of ITS Delaware shares 15,730 6,292 Shares sold to Unifund for $31,200 cash and direct payment of third party expenses of $26,200 574,000 229,600 - less deemed dividend of $.30 per share (172,200) Shares issued for services at $.40 per share: - Unifund 196,000 78,400 - Birmingham 193,000 77,200 - Unifund's CEO 150,000 60,000 - Five third parties 165,000 66,000 - Two third parties (deferred offering costs) 55,000 22,000 ---------- ---------- ITS Delaware Balances, December 31, 1999 1,350,000 $1,011,418 ========== ========== NOTE 4 - DUE FROM RELATED PARTY ITS advanced the president $1,626 during 2002 and the president repaid $850, leaving a balance of $776 as of December 31, 2002.
SB-1/A44th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 44th
NOTE 5 - DEFERRED OFFERING COSTS Legal costs associated with the public offering are being deferred until such time the offering is effective or is aborted. When effective, the deferred offering costs will be charged to equity against the proceeds raised. Deferred offering costs as of December 31, 2002 totaled $183,710. NOTE 6 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Estimated Useful Lives 2002 ------- -------- Furniture and fixtures 5 years $ 25,937 Computers 3 years 3,748 -------- 29,685 Less: accumulated depreciation (26,308) -------- $ 3,377 ======== NOTE 7 - NOTE PAYABLE In the purchase of Pensar (see note 13), ITS purchased a note payable. In August 2000, Pensar purchased computer equipment and financed the purchase over a 48-month term bearing interest of 22.99% with monthly payments of $106. The note is collateralized by the computer equipment. The balance as of December 31, 2002 was $1,674, of which $806 is due in 2003, and $868 in 2004. NOTE 8 - NOTE PAYABLE TO A RELATED PARTY In March 2002 ITS entered into a line of credit agreement with a major shareholder. The agreement provide d for a $25,000 line of credit available to ITS as needed. The limit was increased to $40,000 in August 2002 and increased again to $75,000 in December 2002. Unpaid principal and interest bear an interest rate of 8%, with interest due on the fifteenth of each month which is being accrued. Approximately $20,000 was available for borrowing as of December 31, 2002. The entire unpaid principal and interest is due on December 31, 2003. NOTE 9 - EQUITY In July 2002, ITS increased the authorized common stock outstanding from 20,000,000 to 50,000,000 and the preferred stock from 5,000,000 to 10,000,000. 2001 ---- Birmingham contributed $73 to ITS to fund ongoing operations. Unifund contributed $15,000 to ITS to fund ongoing operations.
SB-1/A45th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 45th
Unifund returned 298,500 shares of ITS common stock to ITS for no consideration. These shares were cancelled. ITS issued 348,500 shares of common stock to several individuals for services provided at $.40 per share, or $139,400. ITS issued 50,000 shares at $.40 per share for deferred offering costs of $20,000. 2002 ---- Birmingham Family Partnership contributed $6,900 to ITS to fund ongoing operations. ITS cancelled 100,000 shares previously issued in 1999 to lawyers for legal services determined in 2002 to be unfulfilled. The cancellation has no effect on the current statement of operations. Unifund and Birmingham transferred 447,000 shares to several individuals for services for ITS. These shares were deemed (a) returned to ITS for no consideration and cancelled, and (b) issued on behalf of ITS, as follows. ITS issued 300,000 shares of common stock for the purchase of Pensar at $.40 per share. See Note 13. ITS issued another 272,000 shares of common stock to several individuals for services provided at $.40 per share, or $108,800. The $108,800 has been recorded as a 2002 expense. ITS issued 100,000 shares at $.40 per share for deferred offering costs of $40,000. NOTE 10 - INCOME TAXES ITS has net a operating loss carryforward of approximately $85,000, which expires in the years 2011 - 2022. Deferred tax assets $ 29,000 Less: valuation allowance (29,000) -------- Net deferred taxes $ 0 ======== NOTE 11 - COMMITMENTS In January 2002, ITS and Pensar both entered into a 3 year office lease with the same related party for $100 per month and $200 per month, respectively, which both expire on December 31, 2004. After the purchase of Pensar by ITS, ITS renegotiated both leases for new terms of $150 per month, expiring on December 31, 2004. ITS incurred rent expense of $1,550 and $4,521 in 2002 and 2001, respectively. Future minimum lease payments are $1,800 per year in 2003 and 2004. In May 2002, ITS entered into a 5-year employment agreement with Carey Birmingham, as President and CEO. The agreement is contingent upon ITS raising a minimum of $125,000. When $125,000 is raised, the 5-year agreement begins. The salary in year one will be $25,000 with a $30,000 increase in year two and a $10,000 per year increase in years three through four and a $25,000 increase in year five. If $500,000 is raised, the salary in year one will be $45,000 with a $10,000 per year increase in years two through four and a $25,000 increase in year five.
SB-1/A46th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 46th
NOTE 12 - MAJOR CUSTOMERS One customer accounted for 90 percent of 2002 sales. ITS sold units for Pensar for a 40 percent commission until May 2002. ITS had no other source of revenue for 2001. No other customer and no vendors accounted for as much as 10 percent of sales or purchases in 2002 or 2001. NOTE 13 - PURCHASE OF PENSAR OPERATIONS On May 1, 2002, ITS merged with Pensar by issuing Pensar 300,000 shares of ITS common stock for all of Pensar's assets and liabilities. The 300,000 shares were valued at $.40 per share, or $120,000. The goodwill of $135,169 was recorded as of May 1, 2002. An impairment review of goodwill was performed as of December 31, 2002, and because the estimated future net cash flows were less than the carrying value of the goodwill, an impairment loss of $135,169 was recorded. Goodwill in the purchase of Pensar represents the excess of the purchase price paid (300,000 shares valued at $.40 per share, or $120,000) over the fair value of the assets acquired ($15,666) net of the liabilities assumed ($30,835). The purchase price was negotiated as a private contract between the two major stockholders of both entities, Birmingham and Unifund. There were no other bidders. The two major shareholders Birmingham and Unifund each returned 100,000 shares of ITS stock to ITS as part of the Pensar purchase. Also, certain ITS shareholders were issued 25,000 shares for services valued at $.40 per share, or $10,000. The primary reason for the merger: ITS was originally formed as the public marketing arm of Pensar products. As planning of the public stock offering progressed, management decided that the legal, accounting and reporting problems created by maintaining two separate entities, one public and one private, were unreasonable and not needed. A summary of the allocation of the purchase price is as follows: Assets acquired Cash $ 153 Other current assets 8,560 Property and equipment 6,953 Liabilities acquired (30,835) Goodwill recorded 135,169 Pensar's results of operations for May 2002 through December 2002 are included in the 2002 Consolidated Statement of Operations. A pro forma summary of results of operations for 2002 and 2001 as if the combination had occurred on January 1, 2001 is as follows: 2002 2001 --------- --------- Sales $ 10,691 $ 14,186 Cost of goods sold 1,206 7,709 Selling expenses 236 General and administrative 166,966 213,680 Depreciation 4,955 3,867 Impairment of goodwill 135,169 Interest expense 3,020 5,157 --------- --------- Net loss $(300,861) $(216,227) ========= =========
SB-1/A47th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 47th
NOTE 14 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT In February 2003, ITS and the two majority shareholders entered into a non-binding letter of intent with a third party to sell 626,000 ITS common shares from the shareholder's personal holdings for $150,000 and for ITS to issue 14,093,000 shares of ITS common stock for $1,000,000. The third party paid a $15,000 non-refundable deposit to the shareholders for their 626,000 shares in February 2003.
SB-1/A48th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 48th
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT To the Members Pensar Technologies, LLC San Antonio, Texas We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Pensar Technologies, LLC, as of December 31, 2001 and the related statements of operations, members' deficit, and cash flows for each of the two years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pensar Technologies, LLC as of December 31, 2001 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. MALONE & BAILEY, PLLC Houston, Texas www.malone-bailey.com April 2, 2002
SB-1/A49th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 49th
PENSAR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC BALANCE SHEET As of April 30, 2002 (Unaudited) ASSETS Current Assets Cash $ 153 Accounts receivable 3,575 Due from related party 878 Inventory 4,107 --------- Total Current Assets 8,713 Property & equipment, net of $22,732 accumulated depreciation 6,953 --------- Total Assets $ 15,666 ========= LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' DEFICIT Current Liabilities Accounts payable $ 28,420 Accrued expenses 198 Due to related party 46 Current portion of note payable 840 --------- Total Current Liabilities 29,504 Long term portion of note payable 1,377 --------- Total Liabilities 30,881 Members' Deficit (15,215) --------- Total Liabilities and Members' Deficit $ 15,666 =========
SB-1/A50th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 50th
PENSAR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS For the Four Months Ended April 30, 2002 (Unaudited) 2002 --------- Sales $ 1,157 Cost of sales 1,206 General & administrative 7,528 Depreciation 1,379 --------- Net loss $ (8,956) =========
SB-1/A51st Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 51st
PENSAR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS For the Four Months Ended April 30, 2002 (Unaudited) 2002 --------- CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net loss $ (8,956) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used by operating activities: Depreciation 1,379 Changes in: Accounts receivable (2,755) Due from related party (25) Inventory (902) Accounts payable (519) Accrued expenses 198 Due to related party (420) --------- NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES (12,000) --------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Capital contributions 10,500 Payments on note payable (300) --------- NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES 10,200 --------- NET CHANGE IN CASH (1,800) CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD 1,953 --------- CASH AT END OF PERIOD $ 153 =========
SB-1/A52nd Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 52nd
PENSAR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements of Pensar Technologies, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company ("Pensar"), have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in Pensar's latest Annual Report filed with the SEC on Form SB-1. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the interim periods presented have been reflected herein. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Notes to the financial statements which would substantially duplicate the disclosure contained in the audited financial statements for the most recent fiscal year 2001 as reported in Form SB-1, have been omitted.
SB-1/A53rd Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 53rd
PENSAR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC BALANCE SHEET As of December 31, 2001 ASSETS Current Assets Cash $ 1,953 Accounts receivable 820 Due from related party 853 Inventory 3,204 --------- Total Current Assets 6,830 Property & equipment, net of $21,353 accumulated depreciation 8,332 --------- Total Assets $ 15,162 ========= LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' DEFICIT Current Liabilities Accounts payable $ 28,937 Due to related party 466 Current portion of note payable 699 --------- Total Current Liabilities 30,102 Long term portion of note payable 1,818 --------- Total Liabilities 31,920 Commitments Members' Deficit (16,758) --------- Total Liabilities and Members' Deficit $ 15,162 =========
SB-1/A54th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 54th
PENSAR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS For the Years Ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 2001 2000 --------- --------- Sales $ 14,186 $ 41,587 Cost of sales 7,709 36,381 Selling expenses 5,675 10,494 General & administrative 63,930 30,427 Depreciation 3,867 3,092 --------- --------- Net loss $ (66,995) $ (38,807) ========= =========
SB-1/A55th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 55th
PENSAR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC STATEMENT OF MEMBERS' DEFICIT For the Years Ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 Balance, December 31, 1999 $ 44 Contributions to capital 21,250 Net loss (38,807) -------- Balance, December 31, 2000 (17,513) Contributions to capital 67,750 Net loss (66,995) -------- Balance, December 31, 2001 $(16,758) ======== See accompanying summary of accounting policies and notes to financial statements.
SB-1/A56th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 56th
PENSAR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS For the Years Ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 2001 2000 --------- --------- CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net loss $ (66,995) $ (38,807) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used by operating activities: Depreciation 3,867 3,092 Changes in: Accounts receivable 1,102 ( 673) Due from related party ( 853) 518 Inventory 2,757 6,114 Accounts payable 1,270 ( 2,101) Due to related party ( 7,060) 10,482 --------- --------- NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES (65,912) (21,375) --------- --------- CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Purchase of property and equipment ( 649) --------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Capital contributions 67,750 21,250 Payments on note payable ( 659) ( 130) --------- --------- NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES 67,091 21,120 --------- --------- NET CHANGE IN CASH 530 ( 255) CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD 1,421 1,676 --------- --------- CASH AT END OF PERIOD $ 1,953 $ 1,421 ========= ========= NONCASH ACTIVITIES: Purchase of seller-financed property and equipment $ 3,306
SB-1/A57th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 57th
PENSAR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Nature of Business. Pensar Technologies, LLC ("Pensar") is a Texas Limited Liability Company formed on April 20, 1995. Pensar assembles equipment used for testing printed circuit boards used in personal computers. The equipment is sold by a sister company, International Test Systems, Inc. These two companies merged on May 5, 2002. See Note 10. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, as well as certain financial statement disclosures. While management believes that the estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the financial statements are appropriate, actual results could differ from these estimates. Cash Equivalents. Highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered cash equivalents. Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recognized when the earning process is complete and the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred to the customer, which is generally considered to have occurred upon shipment of the finished circuit board testing equipment. Software included in the circuit board testing equipment is considered part of the equipment and the related sale. At the point of sale, the software does not require significant modification, customization or subsequent customer support. Product pricing includes the relevant software. A standard 3-year commercial warranty applies, and warranty claims on the limited sales to date are non-existent. Management does not believe significant warranty claims will arise in the future. No upgrades or enhancements are considered likely to sold equipment. Inventories. Inventories are valued at the lower of first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost or market. Long-Lived Assets. Property and equipment are stated on the basis of historical cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Impairment losses are recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets' carrying value. There were no impairment losses in 2001 or 2000. Income taxes. ITS recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to be recovered. ITS provides a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which it does not consider realization of such assets to be more likely than not. Recently issued accounting pronouncements. ITS does not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on ITS results of operations, financial position or cash flow.
SB-1/A58th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 58th
NOTE 2 - DUE FROM RELATED PARTY In 2001, Pensar purchased two computers for one of it's members. The total price was $853, which that shareholder has agreed to reimburse. [Download Table] NOTE 3 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Estimated Useful Lives 2001 ------- -------- Furniture and fixtures 5 years $ 25,730 Computers 3 years 3,995 -------- 29,685 Less: accumulated depreciation (21,353) -------- $ 8,332 ======== NOTE 4 - DUE TO RELATED PARTY By agreement, Pensar pays a 40 percent commission on sales of Pensar products by International Test Systems, Inc. ("ITS"). Both companies have had similar ownership since inception. In addition to commissions and ownership, both companies share management and expenses and at times owe one another money. As of December 31, 2001, Pensar owed ITS $466. NOTE 5 - NOTE PAYABLE In August 2000, Pensar purchased computer equipment and financed the purchase over a 48-month term bearing interest of 22.99% with monthly payments of $106. The note is collateralized by the computer equipment. The balance as of December 31, 2001 was $2,517, of which $699 is due in 2002, $950 in 2003, and $868 in 2004. NOTE 6 - CAPITAL ACCOUNTS Capital contributions of $67,750 and $21,250 have been made for the 2001 and 2000, respectively, by a member to fund ongoing operations. NOTE 7 - INCOME TAXES Pensar is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, its earnings are exempt from federal income taxes. Income or loss is reported on the members' federal income tax returns. NOTE 8 - COMMITMENTS Pensar's previous office lease expired in 2001. In January 2002, Pensar entered into a new three year office lease with a related party for $200 per month which expires on December 31, 2004. Pensar incurred rent expense of $3,535 and $4,325 in 2001 and 2000, respectively. Future minimum lease payments are $2,400 per year in each of 2002, 2003, and 2004.
SB-1/A59th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 59th
NOTE 9 - MAJOR CUSTOMERS Three customers each accounted for 1/3 of 2001 sales. Two different customers accounted for 55 percent and 24 percent of 2000 sales. No other customer and no vendors accounted for as much as 10 percent of sales or purchases. NOTE 10 - SALE OF PENSAR On May 5, 2002, ITS merged with Pensar by issuing Pensar 300,000 shares of ITS common stock for all of Pensar's assets and liabilities. The two major shareholders of both entities Birmingham and Unifund each returned 100,000 shares of ITS stock to ITS as part of the Pensar purchase. Also, certain ITS shareholders were issued 25,000 shares for services valued at $.40 per share, or $10,000. The primary reason for the merger: ITS was originally formed as the public marketing arm of Pensar products. As planning of the public stock offering progressed, management decided that the legal, accounting and reporting problems created by maintaining two separate entities, one public and one private, were unreasonable and not needed. See the separate financial statements of ITS for additional information on the ITS accounting treatment.
SB-1/A60th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 60th
MAY 2002 MERGER WITH PENSAR PRO FORMA DISCLOSURES On May 1, 2002, ITS merged with Pensar by issuing Pensar 300,000 shares of ITS common stock for all of Pensar's assets and liabilities. The 300,000 shares were valued at $.40 per share, or $120,000. The goodwill of $135,169 was recorded and written off to operations as of December 31, 2002. Goodwill in the purchase of Pensar represents the excess of the purchase price paid (300,000 shares valued at $.40 per share, or $120,000) over the fair value of the assets acquired ($15,666) net of the liabilities assumed ($30,835). The purchase price was negotiated as a private contract between the two major stockholders of both entities, Birmingham and Unifund. There were no other bidders. While Pensar has had gross revenues in each of the last two years, the amounts ($14,186 and $41,587 in 2001 and 2000, respectively) are not large. Because Pensar has never made money and significant revenue growth has not occurred in 2002 to date, management concluded that all goodwill associated with the purchase should be written off as of December 31, 2002. Had the merger taken place on January 1, 2001, goodwill would have been the excess of the purchase price paid (300,000 shares valued at $.40 per share, or $120,000) over the fair value as of January 1, 2001 of the assets acquired ($20,854) net of the liabilities assumed ($30,841), which would have resulted in goodwill of $129,987, which is the figure used in the following schedules. The two major shareholders, Birmingham and Unifund, each returned 100,000 shares of ITS stock to ITS as part of the Pensar purchase. Also, certain ITS shareholders were issued 25,000 shares for services valued at $.40 per share, or $10,000. The primary reason for the merger: ITS was originally formed to be the publicly-owned marketing arm of Pensar products. As planning of the public stock offering progressed, management decided that the legal, accounting and reporting problems created by maintaining two separate entities, one public and one private, were unreasonable and not needed. A summary of the allocation of the $120,000 purchase price is as follows: Assets acquired Cash $ 153 Other current assets 8,560 Property and equipment 6,953 Liabilities acquired (30,835) Goodwill recorded 135,169 The following unaudited pro forma balance sheets and statements of operations have been derived from the balance sheets of ITS and Pensar as of April 30, 2002 (unaudited) and December 31, 2001 (audited) and the statements of operations of ITS and Pensar for the four months ended April 30, 2002 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31, 2001 (audited) and adjust such information to give effect to the merger with Pensar as if it had occurred on January 1, 2001. The pro forma statements of operations are presented for informational purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of the results of operations that actually would have resulted if the merger had been consummated on January 1, 2001 nor which may result from future operations. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
SB-1/A61st Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 61st
[Enlarge/Download Table] Unaudited Pro forma results as of April 30, 2002 and for the four months then ended are as follows: Pro Forma ITS Pensar Adj. Combined ----------- --------- --------- ----------- Cash $22 $153 $175 Accounts receivable 30 3,575 3,605 Due from related party 46 878 $ ( 46) 878 Inventory 4,107 4,107 Fixed assets, net 6,953 6,953 Deferred offering costs 105,037 105,037 Goodwill 129,987 129,987 ----------- --------- --------- ----------- $105,135 $15,666 $129,941 $250,742 =========== ========== ========= =========== Accounts payable $565 $28,420 $28,985 Accrued expenses 198 198 Due to related party 500 46 $ (46) 500 Note payable 2,217 2,217 Capital 1,270,891 585,881 (395,157) 1,461,615 Retained deficit (1,166,821) (601,096) 525,144 (1,242,773) ----------- --------- --------- ----------- $105,135 $15,666 $129,941 $250,742 =========== =========== ========== =========== Sales $700 $1,157 $1,857 Cost of goods sold 1,206 1,206 General and administrative 2,334 7,528 9,862 Depreciation 1,379 1,379 ----------- --------- ----------- Net loss $(1,634) $(8,956) $(10,590) =========== =========== ========== ===========
SB-1/A62nd Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 62nd
[Enlarge/Download Table] Unaudited Pro forma results as of December 31, 2001 and for the year then ended are as follows: Pro Forma ITS Pensar Adj. Combined ----------- --------- --------- ----------- Cash $171 $1,953 $2,124 Accounts receivable 30 820 850 Due from related party 466 853 $ ( 466) 853 Inventory 3,204 3,204 Fixed assets, net 8,332 8,332 Deferred offering costs 100,037 100,037 Goodwill 129,987 129,987 ----------- --------- --------- ----------- 100,704 $15,162 $129,521 $245,387 =========== =========== ========== =========== Accounts payable $28,937 $28,937 Due to related party 466 $( 466) Note payable 2,517 2,517 Capital $1,265,891 575,382 (395,158) 1,446,115 Retained deficit (1,165,187) (592,140) 525,145 (1,232,182) ----------- --------- --------- ----------- 100,704 $15,162 $129,521 $245,387 =========== =========== ========== =========== Sales $5,675 $14,186 $( 5,675) $14,186 Cost of goods sold 7,709 7,709 Selling expenses 5,675 ( 5,675) General and administrative 154,907 63,930 218,837 Depreciation 3,867 3,867 ----------- --------- --------- ----------- Net loss $(149,232) $(66,995) $0 $(216,227) =========== =========== ========== ===========
SB-1/A63rd Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 63rd
Certain Provisions Of Our Articles And By-Laws And Disclosure Of Commission Position On Indemnification For Securities Act Liabilities Our Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws contain provisions eliminating the personal liability of a director to the company and its stockholders for certain breaches of his or her fiduciary duty of care as a director. This provision does not, however, eliminate or limit the personal liability of a director for any breach of such director's duty of loyalty to the company or its stockholders, for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, under Delaware statutory provisions making directors personally liable, under a negligence standard, for unlawful dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions, or for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. This provision offers persons who serve on the board of directors of the company protection against awards of monetary damages resulting from breaches of their duty of care, except as indicated above, including grossly negligent business decisions made in connection with takeover proposals for the company. As a result of this provision, the ability of the company or a stockholder thereof to successfully prosecute an action against a director for a breach of his duty of care has been limited. However, the provision does not affect the availability of equitable remedies such as an injunction or rescission based upon a director's breach of his duty of care. The SEC has taken the position that the provision will have no effect on claims arising under the federal securities laws. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of our company pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.
SB-1/A64th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 64th
In addition, the amended certificate and by-laws provide mandatory indemnification rights, subject to limited exceptions, to any person who was or is party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of our company, or is or was serving at the request of our company as a director or officer of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise. Such indemnification rights include reimbursement for expenses incurred by such person in advance of the final disposition of such proceeding in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Where Can Investors Find Additional Information A registration statement on Form SB-1, including amendments thereto, relating to the shares offered hereby has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules thereto. Statements contained in this prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other document referred to are not necessarily complete and in each instance reference is made to the copy of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, each such statement being qualified in all respects by such reference. For further information with respect to us and the securities offered hereby, reference is made to such registration statement, exhibits and schedules. A copy of the registration statement may be inspected by anyone without charge at the Securities and Exchange Commission's principal office located at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, The SEC also maintains a site on the World Wide Web at http://www.sec.gov that contains information regarding registrants that file electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission. As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 4, 2003 Significant Parties The full names and business and residential addresses, as applicable, for the following persons are: (1) the issuer's directors; Carey Birmingham Business Address: International Test Systems, Inc. 16161 College Oak, Suite 101 San Antonio, TX 78249 Residence: 21303 Encino Commons Blvd. #408 San Antonio, Texas 78259 Alex H. Yount Business Address: Koontz McCombs Realty Services 755 East Mulberry Avenue Suite 150 San Antonio, Texas 78212 Residence: 206 East Roosevelt Avenue Boerne, Texas 78006 H. Youval Krigel Business Address: Ktest International, LLC 16161 College Oak, Suite 101 San Antonio, TX 78249 Residence: 14326 Citation San Antonio, Texas 78248
SB-1/A65th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 65th
(2) the issuer's officers; Carey Birmingham, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Business Address: International Test Systems, Inc. 16161 College Oak, Suite 101 San Antonio, TX 78249 Residence: 21303 Encino Commons Blvd. #408 San Antonio, Texas 78259 (3) The issuers general partners; none (4) and (5) record and beneficial owners of 5 percent or more of any class of the issuer's equity securities; Carey Birmingham Business Address: International Test Systems, Inc. 16161 College Oak, Suite 101 San Antonio, TX 78249 Residence: 21303 Encino Commons Blvd. #408 San Antonio, Texas 78259 Unifund Financial Group Business Address 575 Madison Avenue, Suite 1006 New York, NY 10022 Scott Barter Business Address 575 Madison Avenue, Suite 1006 New York, NY 10022 Residential Address 140 East 56th Street Apt. 7D New York, NY 10022 Pensar Technologies, LLC Business Address 16161 College Oak, Suite 101 San Antonio, TX 78249 BFP Texas Business Address 16161 College Oak, Suite 101 San Antonio, TX 78249 (6) promoters of the issuer; Carey Birmingham Business Address: International Test Systems, Inc. 16161 College Oak, Suite 101 San Antonio, TX 78249
SB-1/A66th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 66th
Residence: 21303 Encino Commons Blvd. #408 San Antonio, Texas 78259 H. Youval Krigel Business Address: Ktest International, LLC 16161 College Oak, Suite 101 San Antonio, TX 78249 Residence: 14326 Citation San Antonio, Texas 78248 (7) affiliates of the issuer; Carey Birmingham Business Address: International Test Systems, Inc. 16161 College Oak, Suite 101 San Antonio, TX 78249 Residence: 21303 Encino Commons Blvd. #408 San Antonio, Texas 78259 Alex H. Yount Business Address: Koontz McCombs Realty Services 755 East Mulberry Avenue Suite 150 San Antonio, Texas 78212 Residence: 206 East Roosevelt Avenue Boerne, Texas 78006 H. Youval Krigel Business Address: Ktest International, LLC 16161 College Oak, Suite 101 San Antonio, TX 78249 Residence: 14326 Citation San Antonio, Texas 78248 (8) counsel to the issuer with respect to the proposed offering; David M. Loev, Attorney at Law, 2777 Allen Parkway, Suite 1000, Houston, TX 77019 David Loev Residence 4712 Bellview Bellaire, Texas 77401 (9) each underwriter with respect to the proposed offering; Public Securities, Inc., 300 North Argonne Road, Suite 202, Spokane, Washington 99212. (10)the underwriters directors; William F. Ross 10430 N. Judkins Lane Spokane, WA 99217
SB-1/A67th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 67th
(11)the underwriters officers; William F. Ross 10430 N. Judkins Lane Spokane, WA 99217 (12)the underwriters general partner; and None. (13)counsel to the underwriter. Business Address Charles A. Cleveland, PS 1212 N. Washington St. Spokane, WA 99201 Residential Address Charles A. Cleveland 1212 N. Washington St. Spokane, WA 99201 INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS Our Certificate of Incorporation contains provisions to (i) eliminate the personal liability of our directors for monetary damages resulting from breaches of their fiduciary duty (other than breaches of the duty of loyalty, acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, violations under Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the "DGCL") or for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit) and (ii) indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Section 145 of the DGCL, including circumstances in which indemnification is otherwise discretionary. We believe that these provisions are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers. As a result of this provision, the ability of the Company or a stockholder thereof to successfully prosecute an action against a director for a breach of his duty of care has been limited. However, the provision does not affect the availability of equitable remedies such as an injunction or rescission based upon a director's breach of his duty of care. The Securities and Exchange Commission has taken the position that the provision will have no effect on claims arising under the federal securities laws. In addition, the Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws provide mandatory indemnification rights, subject to limited exceptions, to any person who was or is party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of the Company, or is or was serving at the request of the Company as a director or officer of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise. Such indemnification rights include reimbursement for expenses incurred by such person in advance of the final disposition of such proceeding in accordance with the applicable provisions of the DGCL. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION The estimated expenses of this offering are: Registration Fees $875 Blue Sky Filing Fees $7,500 Attorney's Fees $45,000 Accountant's Fees $18,000 Printing and Copying $1,750 TOTAL $72,125
SB-1/A68th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 68th
UNDERTAKINGS. The registrant hereby undertakes that it will: 1) File, during any period in which it offers or sells securities, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement a) Include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act; b) Reflect in the prospectus any facts or events which, individually or together, represent a fundamental change in the information in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the "Calculation of Registration Fee" table in the effective registration statement; and c) Include any additional or changed material information on the plan of distribution. 2) For determining liability under the Securities Act, treat each post-effective amendment as a new registration statement of the securities offered, and the offering of the securities at that time to be the initial bona fide offering. 3) File a post-effective amendment to remove from registration any of the securities that remain unsold at the end of the offering. 4) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the small business issuer pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the small business issuer has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. 5) In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the small business issuer of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the small business issuer in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the small business issuer will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. UNREGISTERED SECURITIES ISSUED OR SOLD The following shares of common stock were issued to the persons identified below by our company. In September 1999, Carey Birmingham and Youval Krigel received an aggregate of 203,800 shares of stock in consideration for services rendered in connection with the company's formation which were valued at $81,119. The company believes that the transaction was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as transactions by an Issuer not involving a public offering as the individuals had enough knowledge and experience in finance and business matters to be able to bear an economic risk in the company and they had access to the kind of information normally provided in a prospectus. No general solicitation or advertising was used to market the securities. In September 1999, our company issued 50,000 shares to Sheila Corvino, Esq. in partial remuneration for legal services rendered in connection with this offering which were valued at $20,000. The company believes that the transaction was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an Issuer not involving a public offering as the individual has enough knowledge and experience in finance and business matters to evaluate the risks and merits of an investment in the company and the individual has access to the type of information normally provided in a prospectus. From June 1999 through September 1999, Unifund Financial Group, Inc. purchased 574,000 shares of our stock in consideration for $57,400. The company believes that the transaction was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as transactions by an Issuer not involving a public offering as the entity had enough knowledge and experience in finance and business matters to be able to bear an economic risk in the company and it had access to the kind of information normally provided in a prospectus. In addition, no general solicitation or general advertising was used to market the securities. In September 1999, Unifund Financial Group received 196,000 of our shares in consideration for business management financial consulting services which were valued at $78,400. We believe that this transaction was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as the recipient had sufficient knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that it was able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the company, and since the transaction was non-recurring and privately negotiated. The recipient had access to that kind of information normally provided in a prospectus. No general solicitation or advertising was used to market the securities. In September 1999, R. Scott Barter received 150,000 of our shares in consideration for directorial services which were valued at $60,000. The company believes that the transactions were exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as transactions by an Issuer not involving a public offering as the recipient had sufficient knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that he was able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the company, and since the transaction was non-recurring and privately negotiated. The recipient had access to that kind of information normally provided in a prospectus. No general solicitation or advertising was used to market the securities. In September 1999, Brad Smith received 50,000 shares of our stock in consideration for drafting and consulting services which the company valued at $20,000. The company believes that the transaction was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as transactions by an Issuer not involving a public offering as the recipient had sufficient knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that he was able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the company, and since the transaction was non-recurring and privately negotiated. The recipient had access to that kind of information normally provided in a prospectus. No general solicitation or advertising was used to market the securities. In September 1999, Harris Schiff received 10,000 of our shares in consideration for word processing services. The company valued these shares at $4,000. The company believes that the transaction was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as transactions by an Issuer not involving a public offering as the recipient had sufficient knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that he was able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the company, and since the transaction was non-recurring and privately negotiated. The recipient had access to that kind of information normally provided in a prospectus. No general solicitation or advertising was used to market the securities. In September 1999, Alan Scott received 5,000 of our shares in consideration for legal services which the company valued at $2,000. The company believes that the transaction was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an Issuer not involving a public offering as the recipient had sufficient knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that he was able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the company, and since the transaction was non-recurring and privately negotiated. The recipient had access to that kind of information normally provided in a prospectus. No general solicitation or advertising was used to market the securities. In September 1999, we issued Elizabeth Acton, Stephen Birmingham, Dr. Ed Lahniers, B. Raphael Sonsino, and Andree Sonsino an aggregate of 11,200 shares in consideration for various consulting services valued at $4,294. The company believes that the transactions were exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as transactions by an Issuer not involving a public offering as the recipients had sufficient knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that they were able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the company, and since the transaction was non-recurring and privately negotiated. The recipients had access to that kind of information normally provided in a prospectus. No general solicitation or advertising was used to market the securities. In February 2000, Carey Birmingham and Unifund Financial Group each received 250,000 shares of our stock in consideration for an aggregate capital contribution of $50,000. The company believes that these transactions were exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as transactions by an Issuer not involving a public offering as the recipients had sufficient knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that they were able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the company, and since the transaction was non-recurring and privately negotiated. In addition, they had access to the type of information normally provided in a prospectus. In December 2000, Carey Birmingham received 50,000 shares of our stock in lieu of payment for his services as an officer and director for the year ended December 31, 2000 which the company valued at $20,000. The company believes that the transaction was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as transactions by an Issuer not involving a public offering as the recipient had sufficient knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that he was able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the company, he had access to the type of information normally provided in a prospectus, and since the transaction was non-recurring and privately negotiated. In December 2000, H. Youval Krigel received 25,000 of our shares in consideration for services rendered as a director which the company valued at $10,000. The company believes that the transaction was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an Issuer not involving a public offering as the recipient had sufficient knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that he was able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the company, he had access to the type of information normally provided in a prospectus, and since the transaction was non-recurring and privately negotiated. In July 2001, H. Youval Krigel received 34,200 of our shares in consideration for services rendered as a director which the company valued at $13,680. The company believes that the transaction was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an Issuer not involving a public offering as the recipient had sufficient knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that he was able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the company, he had access to the type of information normally provided in a prospectus, and since the transaction was non-recurring and privately negotiated. In July 2001, Elizabeth Acton received 15,800 shares of common stock valued at $6,320 for secretarial services. The company believes that the transaction was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an Issuer not involving a public offering as the recipient had sufficient knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that she was able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the company, and since the transaction was non-recurring and privately negotiated. In May 2002, David M. Loev, Attorney at Law received 100,000 shares of our common stock in consideration for legal services rendered. The company valued these shares at $40,000. The company believes that the transaction was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an Issuer not involving a public offering as the recipient had sufficient knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that it was able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the company, it had access to the type of information normally provided in a prospectus, and since the transaction was non-recurring and privately negotiated.
SB-1/A69th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 69th
In May 2002, Pensar received 300,000 shares in connection with the Asset Purchase Agreement with the company. The company valued these shares at $120,000. The company believes that the transaction was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an Issuer not involving a public offering as the recipient had sufficient knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that it was able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the company, it had access to the type of information normally provided in a prospectus, and since the transaction was non-recurring and privately negotiated In May 2002, Stephen Birmingham, Dr. Ed Lahniers, B. Raphael Sonsino, and Andree Sonsino were issued an aggregate of 25,000 shares of company common stock in consideration for various consulting services which were valued at $10,000. The company believes that the transactions were exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as transactions by an Issuer not involving a public offering as the recipients had sufficient knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that they were able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the company, they had access to the type of information normally provided in a prospectus, and since the transactions were non-recurring and privately negotiated. In March 2003, Wayne Brannan received 16,000 shares from the company in consideration for consulting services rendered valued at $6,400. The company believes that the transaction was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an Issuer not involving a public offering as the recipient had sufficient knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that it was able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the company, it had access to the type of information normally provided in a prospectus, and since the transaction was non-recurring and privately negotiated
SB-1/A70th Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 70th
Index to Exhibits EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION ----------- ----------- 1.1(1) *Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant 1.2(1) By-laws of Registrant 1.3(5) Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation 4.1(3) Form of Share Certificate 4.2(3) Form of Warrant 4.3(3) Form of Warrant Agreement 4.4(4) Form of Subscription Agreement 4.5(6) Form of Escrow Agreement 5.1(6) Opinion of David M. Loev, Attorney at Law, counsel to registrant 10.1(1) Letter of Intent dated June 4, 1999 with Unifund America, Inc. 10.2(2) Reorganization and Stock Subscription Agreement Dated June 16, 1999. 10.3(2) Stock Exchange Agreement dated September 20, 1999 among certain shareholders of International Test Systems, Inc., a Texas corporation and International Test Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation. 10.4(1) Distributorship Agreement dated June 19, 1999 between Pensar, Inc. and International Test Systems, Inc. 10.5(2) Amended and Restated Distributorship Agreement dated April 15, 2000 between Pensar, Inc. and International Test Systems, Inc. 10.6(3) Second Amendment to Distributorship Agreement 10.7(2) *Distributorship Agreement dated April 15, 2000 between Comware Technical Services and International Test Systems, Inc. 10.8(4) Third Amendment to Distributorship Agreement 10.9(4) Employment Agreement with Carey Birmingham 10.10(4) Asset Purchase Agreement between International Test Systems, Inc. and Pensar Technologies, LLC 10.11(4) Underwriting Agreement with Public Securities 23.1(6) Consent of Malone & Bailey, PLLC, Certified Public Accountants. 23.2(6) Consent of David M. Loev, Attorney at Law (1) Filed as an exhibit to our registration statement filed on September 30, 1999 (File No. 333-88179) herein incorporated by reference. (2) Filed as an exhibit to our registration statement filed on July 26, 2000 (File No. 333-88179) herein incorporated by reference. (3) Filed as an exhibit to our registration statement filed on October 30, 2001 (File No. 333-88179) herein incorporated by reference. (4) Filed as an exhibit to our registration statement filed on July 1, 2002 (File No. 333-88179) herein incorporated by reference. (5) Filed as an exhibit to our registration statement filed on January 2, 2003 2002 (File No. 333-88179) herein incorporated by reference. (6) Filed herein.
SB-1/ALast Page of 71TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 71st
SIGNATURES In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements of filing and authorizes this amendment number two to its registration statement on Form SB-1 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, on April 7, 2003. International Test Systems, Inc. /s/ Carey Birmingham ------------------------------------ Carey Birmingham, Chief Executive Officer, President, Principal Financial Officer, Controller, and Director In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement was signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates stated. /s/ Carey Birmingham ------------------------------------ Carey Birmingham, Chief Executive Officer, President, Principal Financial Officer, Controller, And Director Dated: April 7, 2003 -------------------- /s/ H. Youval Krigel ----------------------- H. Youval Krigel, Director Dated: April 7, 2003 /s/ Alex H. Yount ---------------------------- Alex H. Yount, Director Dated: April 7, 2003

Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated By Reference

Referenced-On Page
This SB-1/A Filing   Date First   Last      Other Filings
4/20/951157
5/5/954
9/20/9641
5/13/9935
6/4/9970
6/16/991770
6/19/991170
6/24/9942
9/20/99470
9/30/9970SB-1
12/31/993555
2/2/0028
4/15/001170
7/26/0070SB-1/A
7/31/0011
12/31/002668
1/1/014660
4/30/0128
5/1/0128
6/1/0111
6/30/0142
10/30/0170SB-1/A
12/31/01462
1/8/0234
3/18/0235
4/2/0248
4/30/024961
5/1/021160
5/5/025759
5/7/024
6/30/0227
7/1/0270SB-1/A
10/1/0229
12/31/02460SB-1/A
2/11/0336
3/30/0331
3/31/032829
4/1/03820
4/4/031864
Filed On / Filed As Of4/7/03171
12/31/033144
12/31/041658
 
TopList All Filings


Filing Submission   -   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, SGML, XML, et al.)
Sponsored Ads...

Copyright © 2010 Fran Finnegan & Company.  All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Tue, 9 Feb 21:48:33.2 GMT