SEC Info  
    Home      Search      My Interests      Help      Sign In      Please Sign In

Spongetech Delivery Systems Inc – ‘SB-2/A’ on 1/13/03

On:  Monday, 1/13/03, at 5:18pm ET   ·   Accession #:  1201251-3-7   ·   File #:  333-100925

Previous ‘SB-2’:  ‘SB-2’ on 11/1/02   ·   Next:  ‘SB-2/A’ on 4/11/03   ·   Latest:  ‘SB-2/A’ on 4/11/06

Find Words in Filings emoji
 
  in    Show  and   Hints

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size

 1/13/03  Spongetech Delivery Systems Inc   SB-2/A                14:289K

Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration of Securities by a Small-Business Issuer   —   Form SB-2
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: SB-2/A      First Amendment to Registration Statement             59    239K 
 3: EX-2        Merger Certificate International Into Sub              2      9K 
 2: EX-2        Merger of Spongetech Delivery Into Spongetech Sub      2      9K 
 6: EX-3        Certificate of Amendment Rsi to International          1      7K 
 8: EX-3        Certificate of Amendment Sub to Delvery                1      7K 
 4: EX-3        Certificate of Incorporation                           2±     9K 
 5: EX-3        Certificate of Incorporation of Merger Sub             4     20K 
 7: EX-3.(I)    Certificate of Amendment of Romantic                   1      7K 
 9: EX-5        Revised Opinion of Counsel                             2±    10K 
11: EX-10       License Agreement                                      9     22K 
10: EX-10       Manufacturers Representative Agreement                12     31K 
14: EX-10       Put Agreement                                         20     90K 
12: EX-10       Supply Agreement                                      12     48K 
13: EX-23       Accountants' Consent                                   1      6K 


SB-2/A   —   First Amendment to Registration Statement
Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page   -   Filing Submission
2Calculation of Registration Fee
5Prospectus Summary
6The Offering
7Summary Financial Information
"Risk Factors
11Use of Proceeds
"Capitalization
"Dividend Policy
12Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
14Business
18Management
"Executive Officers and Directors
19Director Compensation
"Executive Compensation
21Indemnification of directors and executive officers and limitation of liability
"Certain Related Party Transactions
22Principal Stockholders
24Description of Securities
"Common Stock
"Preferred Stock
25Reports to Stockholders
"Transfer Agent
"Selling Stockholders
26Stock Purchase Agreement
29Plan of Distribution
31Shares Eligible for Future Sale
"Where You Can Find More Information
32Legal Proceedings
"Legal Matters
"Experts
33Index to Financial Statements
51Item 24. Indemnification of Directors and Officers
55Item 25. Expenses of Issuance and Distribution
56Item 26. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
"Item 28. Undertakings
SB-2/A1st Page of 59TOCTopPreviousNextBottomJust 1st
 

Registration Number: 333-100925 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM SB-2 FIRST AMENDMENT TO REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. --------------------------------- (Name of small business issuer in its charter) Delaware 2840 54-2077231 ----------------------- ---------------------------- ------------------- (State of incorporation (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer or jurisdiction Classification Code Number) Identification No.) of organization) Sunset Industrial Park, 50 20th Street, Brooklyn, New York 11232 (718) 788-4798 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Address and telephone number of principal executive offices) Sunset Industrial Park, 50 20th Street, Brooklyn, New York 11232 (718) 788-4798 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Address of principal place of business or intended principal place of business) Michael L. Metter, Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. Sunset Industrial Park, 50 20th Street, Brooklyn, New York 11232 (718) 788-4798 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Name, address, and telephone number of agent for service) Copies to: Joel Pensley, Esq. 211 Schoolhouse Road Norfolk, Connecticut 06058 Phone: (860) 542-1122 Fax: (626) 608-3076 APPROXIMATE DATE OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC: From time to time after the effective date of the registration statement until such time that all of the shares of common stock registered hereunder have been sold.
SB-2/A2nd Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 2nd
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, other than securities offered only in connection with dividend or interest reinvestment plans, check the following box. /x/ If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. / / If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. / / If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. / / If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, check the following box. / / ------------------------ CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE Proposed Proposed Title of Maximum Maximum Each Class of Amount Offering Aggregate Amount of Securities Being Being Price Per Offering Registration Registered Registered Share (1) Price(1) Fee ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shares of common stock 4,485,000 $ 0.70 $ 3,139,500 $ 288.83 Shares of common stock underlying stock purchase agreement 4,000,000 $ 0.50 $ 2,000,000 184.00 ------------- ---------- TOTAL $ 5,139,500 $ 472.83 (1) Estimated solely for the purposes of computing the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457. The registrant hereby amends the registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that the registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine. ii
SB-2/A3rd Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 3rd
THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE CHANGED. THESE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE SOLD UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IS EFFECTIVE. THE PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL, NOR DOES IT SEEK AN OFFER TO BUY, THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED. Subject to completion: Dated January --, 2003 PROSPECTUS SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. 4,485,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK UP TO 4,000,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK This prospectus relates to the resale by the selling stockholders of 4,485,000 shares of our common stock. None of our securities trades on any securities market. Selling stockholders may sell their shares at $.70 per share until a securities market quotes the shares. Thereafter, selling stockholders, who are not affiliates, may sell their shares at market prices or at privately negotiated prices. Selling stockholders who are affiliates may sell their shares at $.70 per share for the duration of the offering. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the shares presently owned by the selling stockholders We have not retained any underwriter in connection with the sale of our securities. Colebrook, Inc. may use this prospectus in connection with sales of up to 4,000,000 shares of our common stock. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the shares by the selling stockholders. AS YOU REVIEW THE PROSPECTUS, YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE MATTERS DESCRIBED IN "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 5. THE INFORMATION IN THE PROSPECTUS IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE CHANGED. THESE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE SOLD UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IS EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL, NOR DOES IT SEEK AN OFFER TO BUY, THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED. NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THESE SECURITIES OR PASSED ON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. The date of the prospectus is , 2003.
SB-2/A4th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 4th
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ---- Prospectus Summary..................................................... 3 The Offering........................................................... 4 Summary Financial Information.......................................... 5 Risk Factors........................................................... 6 Use of Proceeds........................................................ 9 Capitalization......................................................... 9 Dividend Policy........................................................ 9 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations............................................. 10 Business............................................................... 12 Management............................................................. 15 Executive Officers and Directors...................................... 15 Director Compensation................................................. 16 Executive Compensation................................................ 16 Indemnification of directors and executive officers and limitation of liability......................................... 18 Certain Related Party Transactions..................................... 18 Principal Stockholders................................................. 19 Description of Securities.............................................. 21 Common Stock.......................................................... 21 Preferred Stock....................................................... 21 Reports to Stockholders............................................... 22 Transfer Agent........................................................ 22 Selling Stockholders................................................... 22 Plan of Distribution................................................... 22 Stock Purchase Agreement............................................. 23 Shares Eligible for Future Sale........................................ 26 Where You Can Find More Information.................................... 28 Legal Proceedings...................................................... 29 Legal Matters.......................................................... 29 Experts................................................................ 29 Index to Financial Statements.......................................... F-1 Financial Statements................................................... F-2 ------------------------ You may rely only on the information contained in the prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide information different from that contained in this prospectus. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor sale of common stock means that information contained in the prospectus is correct after the date of the prospectus. This prospectus is not an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy these shares of common stock in any circumstances under which the offer or solicitation is unlawful. 2
SB-2/A5th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 5th
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY We design, produce, market and distribute cleaning products for vehicular use utilizing patented technology relating to sponges containing hydrophilic, which are liquid absorbing, foam polyurethane matrices. Our products can be pre-loaded with detergents and waxes which are absorbed in the core of the sponge then released gradually during use. We have also designed and have started to test market, but have not yet produced or sold, products using the same hydrophilic technology for bath and home use. We were incorporated in New York State on July 18, 1999. As part of a plan of recapitalization and funding, we undertook a series of steps: o On July 15, 2002, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with Nexgen Acquisitions VIII, Inc. (which changed its name to Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc.) under which our sole stockholder, RM Enterprises International, received 12,000,000 shares of the holding company and became its majority stockholder. o On December 16, 2002, we changed our domicile to Delaware. o On December 16, 2002, Nexgen Acquisitions VIII, Inc. (renamed Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc.) merged with and into us so that we became the surviving company. Immediately subsequent to the merger, we changed our name to Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. o On December 26, 2002, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with Colebrook, Inc. The agreement entitles us to issue up to $2 million of our common stock to Colebrook from from time to time, of between $25,000 to $50,000 each time, at our choice, at 70% of the market price of our stock, over a two year period following the effective date of the registration statement of which the prospectus is a part. Proceeds of stock sales will be used for working capital. Our executive officers are located at: Sunset Industrial Park, 50 20th Street, Brooklyn, New York 11232; and our telephone number at that address is (718) 788-4798. 3
SB-2/A6th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 6th
THE OFFERING Common stock outstanding.......... 18,985,000 shares Shares offered by the selling stockholders who are holders of their shares as of the date of the prospectus.............. 4,485,000 shares of common stock Selling stockholder under stock purchase agreement....... Colebrook, Inc. Shares offered pursuant to stock purchase agreement....... A maximum of 4,000,000 shares of common stock Offering Price of Shares......... The shares underlying the stock purchase agreement, being registered hereunder, are being offered to Colebrook from time to time at 70% of the then current market price. Common stock to be outstanding after the offering pursuant to the stock purchase agreement.................... 22,985,000 shares of common stock. Pursuant to the terms of the stock purchase agreement with Colebrook, we are not obli- gated to sell any of our shares, unless it is beneficial to us. Use of proceeds................. The selling stockholders will receive the net proceeds and we will receive none of the pro- ceeds from the sale of the shares offered by the prospectus. The proceeds of shares sold to the investor pursuant to the securities purchase agreement shall be used for working capital. 4
SB-2/A7th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 7th
SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION The following table sets forth our summary consolidated financial data as of May 31, 2002 and August 31, 2002 (unaudited) and for the periods ended May 31, 2002 and 2001, and August 31, 2002 and 2001, which are derived from our financial statements. Statement of Operations Three Months Ended August 31, Year Ended May 31, 2002 2001 2002 2001 ----------- ----------- ----------- -------------- (unaudited) (unaudited) ----------- ----------- Sales $ 8,797 $ 15,669 $ 89,973 $ 11,790 Cost of goods sold 1,337 14,804 121,643 31,683 ---------- ---------- ------------ ----------- Gross profit (loss) 7,460 865 (31,670) (19,893) Operating expenses 18,540 26,342 70,407 177,997 ---------- ---------- ------------ ----------- Loss before income taxes (11,080) (25,477) (102,077) (197,890) Income taxes 400 373 400 428 ---------- ---------- ------------ ----------- Net loss $ (11,480) $ (25,850) $ (102,477) $ (198,318) ========== ========== ============ =========== Net loss per share Basic and diluted NIL NIL $ (.01) $ (.02) ========== =========== ============ =========== Weighted average common shares outstanding 15,644,348 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 ========== ========== ========== ========== Balance sheet data: Total assets $ 99,598 $ 89,633 Total liabilities 254,640 238,585 Shareholders' equity (deficiency) (155,042) (148,952) RISK FACTORS You should carefully consider the following factors in addition to the other information in this prospectus, including the financial statements and related notes, before investing in the common stock. These risk factors are all those which we believe are material to our business. Risks and uncertainties that we do not presently know about or that we currently believe are immaterial may also impair our business. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations will most likely suffer. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline; and you could lose all or part of your investment. 5
SB-2/A8th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 8th
If we do not raise additional financing, there is a high risk that our business will fail. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We have suffered losses since our inception, have a significant stockholders' equity deficiency, have minimal cash, have a working capital deficiency and have only recently concluded our first material purchase orders. If financing is not available or obtainable, our investors may lose a substantial portion or all of their investment and our business may fail. We have entered into a stock purchase agreement with an investor. However, we can offer no assurance that we will be able to sell any stock pursuant to that agreement to solve our financing needs. Consequently, we can provide no assurance that additional financing, when necessary, will be available at all, or if available, on acceptable terms. We have arranged for purchase order financing for our orders with Turtle Wax. However, there is no assurance that the finance company will advance funds for future purchase orders with Turtle Wax or any other purchaser of our products. If we fail to raise additional funds, we will may unable to fulfill orders, market our products, or make molds for new products; and as a result our business may fail. Our auditors have questioned our ability to continue as a going concern. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Our independent auditor's report letter which accompanies our financial statements states that our recurring net losses, working capital deficiency and stockholders' equity deficiency raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. If we are unable to increase our revenues while containing costs, or decreasing costs while maintaining revenues or raising substantial funds from third parties, we will be unable to continue as a going concern and will be forced to suspend operations. We experience competition from many companies and methodologies. ---------------------------------------------------------------- We experience competition from many companies which manufacture soap products, car care products, sponges and related applicators, as well as manufacturers of power spray and other car wash products. Our bath and home care products, if and when launched, will compete with major international soap and detergent manufacturers as well as less well-know brands. Many of these suppliers offer broader product lines and have substantially greater financial, technical, marketing, distribution and other resources than we do. As a result, we may not be able to market our products successfully and thus will not be able to grow or even maintain our business. The market place may be indifferent to our products. ---------------------------------------------------- Our hydrophilic sponge, and products based on it, feature an internal structure which holds detergents and waxes which are released only in use. Potential users may be satisfied with the cleaners, waxes and applicators they are presently using. Thus, we may expend our financial and personnel resources on design, marketing and advertising without generating concomitant revenues. 6
SB-2/A9th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 9th
Price competition may undercut our marketing efforts. ----------------------------------------------------- Although we believe that our automobile products offer features and benefits not found in other car care products, other products, such as kitchen detergent and cloths, are less expensive. Thus, vehicle owners may prefer to save money and forgo the convenience of our hydrophylic sponges and choose not to purchase them, jeopardizing our revenues and profitability. We presently depend on one customer for almost all of our sales. ---------------------------------------------------------------- We have received two purchase orders for the supply of our automobile wash and wax product to Turtle Wax. Although we are exploring and marketing our product in other marketing channels for our automobile cleanser and wax product and our child's bath and our home cleaning products, these channels have generated little revenues to date for our automobile product and no revenues for our other products and we can offer no assurance that they will ever be commercially viable. In the event we cannot deliver or orders to Turtle Wax in the quantity or of the quality desired or Turtle Wax does not enter into new purchase orders after the completion of the existing orders, we may have no existing business nor prospects for new business. We depend on products made using one technology. ------------------------------------------------ Our automobile cleaning and waxing product, our child's bath product and the household cleaning products depend on the use of licensed technology relating to sponges incorporating a hydrophilic (liquid absorbing) polyurethane matrix. A number of factors could limit our sales of these products, or the profitability of such sales, including competitive efforts by other manufacturers of similar products, shifts in consumer preferences or introduction and acceptance of alternative product offerings. We have developed no other products using other technologies and thus if our existing products or others based on the same technology fail in the marketplace, our business would fail. The patents on our licensed technology may not be able to be defended against infringement. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the event a competitor uses our licensed technology, our licensor may not be able successfully to assert patent infringement claims. In that event, we may encounter direct competition using the same technology on which our products are based and may not be able to compete. We depend on one manufacturer for all our products. --------------------------------------------------- Our licensor is also our manufacturer. Our reliance on a sole supplier involves several risks, including our potential inability to obtain adequate supplies and reduced control over pricing and timely delivery. Although the timeliness, quality and pricing of deliveries from our licensor has been acceptable to date there can be no assurance that supplies will be available on an acceptable basis or that delays in obtaining new suppliers will not have an adverse effect. Our inability to obtain adequate supplies of hydrophilic sponges, chemicals, packaging materials, or finished products would prevent us from fulfilling orders. 7
SB-2/A10th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 10th
Our stock may not be able to trade on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board or, when and if established, the Bulletin Board Exchange. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We intend that our securities trade on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board. However, we can offer no assurance that our securities will so trade and, if they do trade on the OTCBB, whether an active trading market will be established or, if established, whether it can be maintained. The National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. has announced the formation of a new automated marketplace, the Bulletin Board Exchange, and the eventual dissolution of the OTCBB. We can offer no assurance that our securities will be accepted on the BBX, if established, and, if they do not, our securities may trade on the Pink Sheets, a non-automated market with a consequential lack of liquidity. An active market for our common stock may not develop, making it difficult for you to sell your stock and preventing us from raising money through our stock purchase agreement. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prior to the date of the prospectus, there has been no public market for our common stock. It is uncertain the extent to which a trading market will develop or how liquid that market might become. An illiquid market for our stock may result in price volatility and poor execution of buy and sell orders for investors. Historically, stock prices and trading volumes for newly public companies fluctuate widely for a number of reasons, including some reasons that may be unrelated to their business or results of operations. The price of our common stock may be low and our volume below that which we need to sell our stock to the investor pursuant to the stock purchase agreement stock. Thus, the possibility of funding our ongoing operations will ceease in the event an active trading market does not develop. The exercise of our put rights may substantially dilute the interests of other security holders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We will issue shares to the investor upon exercise of our put rights at a price equal to 70% of the average closing bid price for the five days preceding the date we give notice of our intention to exercise a put. Accordingly, the exercise of our put rights may result in substantial dilution to other holders of our common stock. Depending on the price per share of our common stock during the valuation periods of our puts, we may need to register additional shares for resale to access the full amount of financing available. Registering additional shares could have a further dilutive effect on the value of our common stock. If we are unable to register the additional shares of common stock, we may experience delays in, or be unable to, access some of the $2 million available under our put rights. The sale of material amounts of our common stock could reduce the price of our common stock and encourage short sales. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If and when we exercise our put rights and sell shares of our common stock to the investor and if and to the extent that the investor sells the common stock, our common stock price may decrease due to the additional shares in the market. If the price of our common stock decreases, and if we decide to exercise our right to put shares to Colebrook, we must issue more shares of our common stock for any given dollar amount received. Stock issuances may encourage short sales, which could place further downward pressure on the price of our common stock. 8
SB-2/A11th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 11th
USE OF PROCEEDS We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the stockholders' shares offered by this prospectus. All proceeds from the sale of the stockholders' shares will be for the accounts of the selling stockholders. Proceeds, if any, from the sale of stock pursuant to the stock purchase agreement will be used for working capital. CAPITALIZATION The following table sets forth our capitalization as of August 31, 2002. August 31, 2002 ----------- (Unaudited) Long-term debt $ 51,930 Stockholders' equity: Common stock $.001 par value per share; authorized 50,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 18,985,000 shares 18,985 Preferred stock, $.001 par value; authorized 5,000,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding Additional paid-in capital 190,448 Accumulated deficit (364,475) Total stockholders' equity (deficiency) $ (155,042) Total capitalization $ (103,112) Dividend Policy --------------- We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. 9
SB-2/A12th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 12th
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED MAY 31, 2002 AND MAY 31, 2001 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The following discussion includes forward-looking statements with respect to our future financial performance. These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including the factors described in the section titled Risk factors and elsewhere in this prospectus, that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those currently anticipated. You should read the following discussion together with the consolidated financial statements and their accompanying notes, included elsewhere in the prospectus. General We were incorporated in New York State on July 18, 1999. On July 15, 2002, we entered into a stock purchase agreement under which we became a wholly-owned subsidiary. Our sole stockholder, received 12,000,000 shares of the holding company or approximately 63% of the outstanding common stock and became its majority stockholder. On December 16, 2002, we changed our domicile to Delaware and our parent company merged with and into us so that we became the surviving company. As part of the merger, we changed our name to Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. We distribute a line of automobile cleaning products featuring hydrophilic polyurethane sponge technology and have developed bath and home applications using the same technology. Sponges of hydrophilic polyurethane are constructed in a matrix pattern which can absorb liquids such as soaps, cleaning fluids and waxes which are released only when the sponge is squeezed in use. Results of Operations Three Months Ended August 31, 2002 (unaudited) and 2001 (unaudited) ------------------------------------------------------------------- Results of operations reflect total operating revenues of $8,797 and $15,669 for the three months ended August 31, 2002 (unaudited) and 2001 (unaudited), respectively. This decrease of $6,872 is primarily attributed to cash flow constraints, which interrupted our marketing efforts. Gross profit increased from $865 for the three months ended August 31, 2001 to $7,460 for the three months ended August 31, 2002. This increase is primarily attributed to certain manufacturing charges paid in 2001, which did not occur in 2002. Operating expenses decreased from $26,342 for the three months ended August 31, 2001 to $18,540 for the three months ended August 31, 2002. This decrease is attributed to the significant reduction in marketing efforts, which include customer samples and attendance at trade shows. Net loss was $11,480 and $25,850 for the three months ended August 31, 2002 (unaudited) and 2001 (unaudited), respectively. 10
SB-2/A13th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 13th
Because of the requirement that certain minimums must be manufactured per order, our inventory as of August 31, 2002 was higher than needed for immediate sales. Sales from the radio program, independent automotive parts stores and promotional sales have increased but as of August 31, 2002 totaled only $8,797. In addition, the purchase orders with Turtle Wax are drop-shipped directly to the customer from the manufacturer and never constitute inventory. Thus the ratio of sales to inventory is low. No sales have been or are contemplated to be made to related parties. Years Ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 --------------------------------- Operating revenues increased by $78,183 from $11,790 for the year ended May 31, 2001 as compared to $89,973 for the year ended May 31, 2002. This increase is primarily attributed to the establishment of additional products and the marketing efforts of the prior year. We posted gross losses of $31,670 and $19,893 for the years ended May 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. These gross losses were attributed to manufacturing costs incurred in the development of new sponge products. Operating expenses decreased from $177,997 for the year ended May 31, 2001 to $70,407 for the year ended May 31, 2002. This decrease is attributed to a significant decrease in marketing expenditures and consulting services. Net loss was $102,477 and $198,318 for the years ended May 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. This decrease in the net loss of $95,841 is the result of the items mentioned above. Liquidity and Capital Resources ------------------------------- We had cash of $90 at August 31, 2002 and $100 at December 31, 2002. During the three months ended August 31, 2002, net cash used in operating activities aggregated $78. There were no investing or financing activities during the three months ended August 31, 2002. Cash required for our operations has been provided by our major stockholder as an additional capital contribution. During the year ended May 31, 2002, net cash used in operating activities aggregated $43,285 as compared to $115,896 used in the year ended May 31, 2001. This decrease in the amount of cash used in operating activities is primarily attributed to the decrease in net loss for the year ended May 31, 2002 as compared to the net loss for the year ended May 31, 2001. Cash required for our operations has been provided by our major stockholder as an additional capital contribution. Net cash used in investing activities during the year ended May 31, 2002 aggregated $33,540, as compared to $14,900 used in the year ended May 31, 2001. This increase is attributed to the purchasing of office equipment of approximately $10,000 and additional purchases of product molds aggregating approximately $23,000. Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended May 31, 2002 was $76,943 as compared to $130,100 during the year ended May 31, 2001. This decrease is primarily attributed to a reduction in the support from Spongetech International's prior parent and no additional notes payable incurred during the year ended May 31, 2002. The working capital (deficiency) at August 31, 2002 was approximately ($144,000) as compared to the working capital (deficiency) of approximately ($137,000) at May 31, 2002. Total liabilities exceed total assets by approximately $155,000 and $149,000 as of August 31, 2002 and May 31, 2002, respectively. These factors create substantial doubt our ability to continue as a going concern. The recovery of assets and the continuation of future operations are dependent upon our ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing and its ability to generate revenues sufficient to continue pursuing its business purpose. We cannot guarantee that the results from operations will be sufficient to support our liquidity requirements through August 31, 2003 and beyond. There can be no assurances that the above actions will be accomplished or whether they will be adequate. We have received purchase order financing for two Turtle Wax orders aggregating $93,849. The finance company also guarantees the solvency of the purchaser. The purchaser pays for the orders directly to the finance company; and we receive the balance of the order after deduction of principal and interest. The loans were guaranteed personally by Steven Moskowitz, our Secretary. 11
SB-2/A14th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 14th
BUSINESS Our Company ----------- We design, produce, market and distribute cleaning products for vehicular and home use utilizing patented technology relating to hydrophilic (liquid absorbent) foam polyurethane matrices. The Technology -------------- We entered into a license agreement on July 1, 2001 on patented technology relating to hydrophilic polyurethane matrices on an exclusive basis from H. H. Brown Shoe Technologies, Inc., Greenwich, CT., (dba Dicon Technologies), a majority-owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. Our license is co-extensive with a patent on technology jointly developed by one of our former employees which covers the design, manufacture and use of a liquid-absorbent layer in a "molded sponge design." Pursuant to the license agreement, Dicon retained title to the technology and paid all expenses in connection with the filing and maintaining of the patent. Dicon granted a personal, exclusive, royalty-free worldwide right and license to use and sell sponge of indefinite duration products incorporating the technology. Certain minimum quantities of production, as set forth in a requirements agreement with Dicon are needed to continue the license. Dicon has the right, without restriction, to license its technology in areas other than sponges. The license is a continuing one for the full life of the design patent. The technology is also used to draw fluids out of a human body, such as body odors, and store them in the polyurethane matrix. Shoe liners, incontinent pads and nursing pads were originally contemplated as product embodiments of the technology. Companies such as Payless Shoes and H. H. Brown Shoe Company (the licensor) use the technology for inner soles to absorb sweat and odors. Revlon is a licensee of the technology which it uses in a cosmetic make-up removal product. Our license is based on the discovery that if a sponge incorporating the hydrophilic matrix is be filled with detergents and waxes, the matrix would retain these cleaning and polishing agents which would only be released when the sponge was squeezed. Thus, soap or wax could be retained for many uses and the sponge could be rinsed after use without losing the cleaning agent or wax. Supply and Requirements Agreement ---------------------------------- Also on July 1, 2002, we entered into an exclusive worldwide supply and requirements agreement with Dicon under which we must purchase from Dicon certain minimum quantities of our sponges containing the Dicon hydrophilic matrix as follows: Annual Period Number of Sponge Products ------------- ------------------------- 1st annual period 250,000 2nd annual period 500,000 and each succeeding annual period 1,000,000 at the following prices: Aggregate Purchases Price per spong product ------------------- ---------------------- 50,000 to 100,000 $.817 sponge only 100,000 to 250,000 $.795 sponge only Over 250,000 $.778 sponge only 12
SB-2/A15th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 15th
In the event the minimum quantities are not ordered, we must pay Dicon liquidated damages of $.20 per sponge for the deficiency. If we fail to pay the damages promptly, our license becomes non-exclusive for subsequent periods. Dicon may after the first annual period raise the prices it charges only if such increase is based bona fide increases for material and labor plus an appropriate markup for overhead. The agreement expires at the end of the third annual period with options to renew for two additional successive periods. Dicon has designed and installed specialized equipment for producing molded foam products containing this superabsorbent polymer infused with detergents, soaps and waxes used as an absorbing and cleaning sponge product. The agreement sets forth minimum purchase requirements and pricing for the basic sponge product. Using its patented processes, Dicon manufactures products derives from "Hydrophilic Urethane Chemistry." The hydrophilic system has two parts, a hydrophilic pre-polymer phase and a water phase. During this water phase, various water soluble active ingredients are introduced into the products. We are the assignee of a manufacturers representative agreement with Dicon which was originally entered into by R M Enterprises our majority stockholder. Pursuant to this agreement, we may introduce customers for additional hydrophilic foam products directly on a commission basis. Products -------- We have designed specially configured sponges containing an outer contact layer and an inner matrix. We load the inner matrix of the sponge with especially formulated soaps and, in our automotive product, soap and wax. When the sponge is applied to a surface with minimal pressure, the soap or soap and wax are simultaneously applied to the surface. When the sponge is not in use, the hydrophilic matrix holds the soap so that it does not leech out of the sponge. We believe that our use of the patent has great marketing potential. We can choose any variety of cleansers, including anti-bacterial and abrasive soaps. Thus, we may fine-tune our products for use on different kinds of vehicles. New vehicles or those prepared for classic car shows require a gentle cleaner, whereas older cars which have developed a film over the paint or where the paint has faded may require a cleanser containing a compounding substance, a gentle abrasive. Depending on the use of our vehicular sponge, we may include a wax, or may only include the cleanser. Sales and Marketing ------------------- On September 17, 2002, we were issued a purchase order from Turtle Wax for our private label auto applicator and appropriate packaging containing the words "Turtle Wax Zip Wax" and the Turtle Wax logo imprint as part of the sponge itself. The total amount of the first purchase order is $62,475 with shipments scheduled beginning January, 2003. Subsequently, we have received an additional purchase order from Turtle Wax in the amount of $60,921 with shipping dates beginning February, 2003. We have already delivered a test order of 600 units and have placed orders for the product pursuant to our supply agreement with Dicon. We have ordered the packaging from unaffiliated suppliers. The product will be drop shipped to the Turtle Wax warehouse in Chicago, Illinois. We have also recently inaugurated an advertising program on the radio program "Business Talk Radio" on the Jeff Brooks Show "On the Road." This is a call-in nationally syndicated radio program on automobiles and related products. Advertising is directed to our website (www.spongetech.com) and to our toll-free number. We have retained a telemarketing company to take orders and use a fulfillment house to pack and ship orders to customers. We pay the radio station on a per item sold basis. We have not received significant orders from this radio program and can give no assurances that it will become a successful marketing channel. 13
SB-2/A16th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 16th
We have entered into agreements with two distributors, one in the midwest and one on the west coast. Their representatives visit and resell our automobile sponge products to auto accessories stores - both independently-owned and chains under the "Spongetech" brand name. We ship periodically to them. We have not received significant orders from these distributors. We have started selling our automotive sponge to a product marketer - a logo and special message product company - which places unique promotional advertising messages on our products for its customers. We have received purchase orders which have aggregated, as of the date of this prospectus, 300 units containing the logo of businesses including a local bank and an automobile dealership. 13
SB-2/A17th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 17th
We have developed a children's bath foam sponge, with a "safe mesh" coating which prevents tearing, in the shape of animals in various colors. The sponges, which float, are infused with a gentle no-tear, non-irritating anti-bacterial soap. The bath foam sponge does not lose its soap while it is floating in the bath tub as the soap is retained by the inner hydrophilic matrix until the child squeezes the sponge in use. We are developing retail outlets to sell this product, ranging from pharmacies to department stores. We intend to market directly. Dicon will manufacture this product for us. We have not yet made sales and cannot offer any assurances that sales will result from our proposed marketing campaign. We have developed household cleaning sponges infused with anti-bacterial bath and kitchen soaps. The products are being testing by a national detergent manufacturer for possible use under its logo and brand. We cannot predict whether or not the manufacturer will purchase our sponges and, if it does, whether the product will succeed in the marketplace. Research and Development ------------------------ Our research and development program consists principally of devising or testing new products, improving the efficiency of existing ones, evaluating the environmental compatibility of products and market testing. We estimate that our management devoted 2,000 man hours to developing the product, packaging and marketing. We did not pay cash compensation for research and development activities. Facilities ---------- Our corporate headquarters are located in an industrial park in Brooklyn, New York where we share 2,000 square feet of equipped office space and 10,000 square feet of warehouse space with other companies affiliated with our major shareholder. Expenses incurred in the operations of the facility, including rent, telephone, and other office expenses, are allocated to us based on our usage. Employees --------- We currently employ five people of whom three are business and sales management, and the remainder staff. Competition ----------- We compete with international, national and local manufacturers and distributors of soaps, detergents, waxes, sponges, cloths and other automotive, household and bath products. Indirectly, in the automotive product area, we compete with drive-through auto washes. Our competition, for the most part, has brand recognition and large marketing and advertising budgets. Many competing products are less expensive than ours to the consumer. We face major multinational competition in our proposed household and children's bath product. Although our product is unique and patented, we cannot predict its acceptance in any of the marketplace for which they are designed. 14
SB-2/A18th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 18th
MANAGEMENT Executive Officers and Directors -------------------------------- The following table sets forth certain information regarding our executive officers and directors: Name Age Position Since ------------------------ --- ------------- --------- Michael Metter 51 President One Tinker Lane Chief Executive Officer Greenwich, CT 06830 and a Director 5/2001 Steven Moskowitz 38 Secretary 50 20th Street and a Director 6/1999 Brooklyn, New York 11232 Jerome Schlanger 46 Treasurer 50 20th Street and a Director 6/1999 Brooklyn, New York 11232 Frank Lazauskas 42 A Director 7/2001 51 Niagara Street Newark, New Jersey 07105 Roger Eichenholtz 59 Chief Financial Officer 50 20th Street Chief Accounting Officer 8/2000 Brooklyn, New York 11232 ---------------- Michael Metter was was a principal of Security Capital Trading, a business and marketing consultancy from 1998 to April, 2001. From April, 2001 to the present, he has been president of RM Enterprises, Inc., our majority stockholder, a holding company which also is the sole shareholder of Flo Weinberg Originals, a designer and distributor of women's clothing. From 1994 to 1998, he was President of First Cambridge Securities, a broker/dealer. From 1991 to 1994, Mr. Metter was a Vice-President of the following broker/dealers: Royce Investment Group; Gruntal & Company from 1990 to 1991; Commonwealth Associates from 1989 to 1990; Prudential-Bache Securities from 1988 to 1989; of D.H. Blair & Company, 1981 to 1989. Prior to 1981, Mr. Metter served as an independent consultant and buyer for retail department stores. From 1983 to 1985, he was the owner of Metter Broadcasting which operated four radio stations. Mr. Metter received his MBA in Finance in 1975 and his B.A. in Marketing and Accounting in 1973 from Adelphi University. Steven Moskowitz served as Vice President Marketing and Business Development for H. W. Carter & Sons, a distributor of children's clothing, from 1997 to 2002. He was President of the H. W. Carter & Sons division of Evolutions, Inc. from 1996 to 1997. Mr. Moskowitz served in various capacities at Smart Style Industries, a manufacturer and distributor of ladies' apparel, from 1986 to 1996 from sales assistant to Vice President Sales and Marketing. He received his B.S. in Management from Touro College in 1986. Jerome Schlanger has been Vice-President, Consulting, for NEMA Consulting since 1987 a business management consultant. From 1977 to 1987, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of B.T. Inc. a developer of residential real estate. He received his B.S. in Business Administration from Villanova University in 1978. 15
SB-2/A19th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 19th
Roger Eichenholtz served as an Independent Principal, International Communications Management, Inc., a provider of accounting, management and financial services, from April 1996 to August, 2002. He served as Vice President Finance, Viva Optique, Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of opthalmics, from March, 1993 to April, 1996. From February, 1992 to March, 1993, he was principal of Eichenholtz Associates, a financial consultant to medium and small businesses. Mr. Eichenholzt was Vice President-Finance & Chief Operating Officer of Mitchell Apparel Group, a clothing manufacturer and distributor, from June, 1986 to February, 1992. From May, 1985 to June, 1986, he served as Vice President - Finance, MBW Advertising Network, Inc., an advertising agency. He was Chief Financial Officer, Intermaritime Forwarding Company, Inc. from January, 1979 to April, 1985, an international freight forwarder and custom house broker. From November, 1972 to December, 1978, Mr. Eichenholtz was Controller and Chief Financial Officer of CBA Industries, Inc./Today Newspapers, Inc., a publisher of a weekly shopping newspaper and a distributor of advertising inserts, from November, 1972 to December, 1978 and from April, 1970 to November, 1972, Controller of Botany Industries, Inc., a cloting manufacturer and retailer. He was Senior Accountant at Coopers & Lybrand, certifed public accountants, from October, 1966 to March, 1970. Mr. Eichenholtz received his BBA in Accounting & Finance from Pace University in 1966; his MBA in Finance from Pace University in 1969. Frank Lazauskas is the founder and President of FJL Enterpreises, Inc., and TNJ Enterprises, Inc., formed in 1999 and 1997 respectively, which own and operate eight Dominos Pizza Stores. From 1986 to 1997, Mr. Lazauskas was the founder and President of FJL Pizza, Inc. which operated the stores. From 1983 to 1986, Mr. Lazauskas was employed by RPM Pizza, Inc., the franchisee of 300 Dominoes Pizza stores, in positions progressively as area superviser, regional operations manager, regional vice president and regional president. He received his B.A. in Mathematics from Central Connecticut State University in 1983. Director Compensation --------------------- Our directors do not receive cash compensation for their services as directors but are reimbursed for their reasonable expenses for attending board and board committee meetings. Our board of directors has not established any committees. Executive Compensation ---------------------- The following table sets forth for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2002 and 2001, the compensation we paid to our Chief Executive Officer(s) and any other executive officers who earned in excess of $100,000 based on salary and bonus. Summary Compensation Table [Enlarge/Download Table] Long Term Compensation Annual Compensation Awards ==================================================================================================================== Other Annual Securities Name and Principal Compensation Underlying Position Year(1) Salary ($) Bonus ($) ($) Options/SARs (#) ==================================================================================================================== Michael Metter 05/31/02 -0- -0- -0- -0- Chief Executive Officer 05/31/01 -0- -0- -0- -0- 16
SB-2/A20th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 20th
Option Grants for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 -------------------------------------------------------------- The following table sets forth information concerning the grant of stock options to the named executive officer during the fiscal years ended May 31, 2002 and 2001. [Enlarge/Download Table] Individual Grants ====================================================================================================================== Potential Realizable Value at Assumed Number of % of Total Annual Rates of Shares Options Stock Price Underlying Granted to Exercise Appreciation Options Employees Price Per Expiration for Option Term Name Granted in Year Share Date 5% 10% ====================================================================================================================== Michael Metter -0- -0-% - - - - Aggregated Option Exercise for the fiscal years Ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 and Fiscal Year-End Option Values The following table sets forth information concerning the exercise of stock options during the fiscal years ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 by the named executive officer, and his options outstanding at the end of the transition period. [Enlarge/Download Table] ====================================================================================================================== Aggregate Option/SAR Exercises in Transition Period and TP-End Option/SAR Values ====================================================================================================================== Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options/SARs at TPY-End Value of Unexercised In- Shares (#) the Money Options/SARs Acquired on Value =========================== at TP-End ($) Name Exercise (#) Realized ($) Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable ====================================================================================================================== Michael Metter -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- ====================================================================================================================== 17
SB-2/A21st Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 21st
Indemnification of directors and executive officers and limitation of liability ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law authorizes a court to award, or a corporation's board of directors to grant, indemnity to directors and officers in terms sufficiently broad to permit such indemnification under certain circumstances for liabilities (including reimbursement for expenses incurred) arising under the Securities Act. As permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended certificate of incorporation includes a provision that eliminates the personal liability of our directors for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability (1) for any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to our company or our stockholders, (2) for acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (3) under section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (regarding unlawful dividends and stock purchases) or (4) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. As permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, our Bylaws provide that we are required to indemnify our directors and officers, consultants and employees to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law. Subject to certain very limited exceptions, we are required to advance expenses, as incurred, in connection with a legal proceeding to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, subject to certain very limited exceptions. The rights conferred in our bylaws are not exclusive. We have not obtained directors' and officers' liability insurance. CERTAIN RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS We were incorporated in New York State on July 18, 1999 by RM Enterprises International, Inc. which was issued 5,000 shares representing all our issued and outstanding capital stock. On July 15, 2002, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with Nexgen Acquisitions VIII, Inc. (which changed its name to Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc.) under which we became a wholly-owned subsidiary. Our sole stockholder, RM Enterprises International, received 12,000,000 shares of the holding company and became its majority stockholder. In September, 2002, the major stockholder of Nexgen Acquisitions VIII transferred 2,000,000 shares to Robert Rubin, a beneficial owner of stock of RM Enterprises. On December 16, 2002, we changed our domicile to Delaware. On December 16, 2002, our parent company merged with and into us so that we becamse the surviving company. Immediately subsequent to the merger, we changed our name to Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. We believe that these transactions were on terms as favorable as could have been obtained from an unaffiliated third party. All future transactions we enter into with our directors, executive officers and other affiliated persons will be on terms no less favorable to us than can be obtained from an unaffiliated party and will be approved by a majority of independent, disinterested members of our board of directors, and who had access, at our expense, to our or independent legal counsel. 18
SB-2/A22nd Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 22nd
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS The following table sets forth certain information with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock as of the date of the prospectus by each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock, each of our directors and executive officers and all executive officers and directors as a group. Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned(1)(2) ----------------------------------------------- Name Title Number Percent ------------------ --------------- ----------- ------- RM Enterprises International, Ltd. (3) 12,000,000 63.2% 50 20th Street Brooklyn, New York 11232 Nexgen Holdings, Inc. (4) 2,791,000 14.7% 410 Park Avenue Ndw York, New York 10022 Rubin Family Irrevocable Stock Trust (5) 2,555,568 13.5% 25 Highland Boulevard Dix Hills, New York 11746 Michael Metter (6) President -0- -0-% One Tinker Lane Greenwich, CT 06830 Steven Moskowitz (7) Secretary -0- -0-% 50 20th Street Brooklyn, New York 11232 Jerome Schlanger (8) Treasurer 985,314 5.2% 50 20th Street Brooklyn, New York 11232 Frank Lazauskas (9) A Director 883,654 4.4% 51 Niagara Street Newark, New Jersey 07105 Kenneth Hubbard (10) 985,314 5.2% 19 Booth Court Millbrook, New York 12545 Carole Klein (11) 985,314 5.2% 18 Aspen Way Morristown, New Jersey 07960 Roger Eichenholtz (12) 135,260 0.7% 50 20th Street Brooklyn, New York 11232 Officers and Directors 2,004,228 10.5% (5 persons) -------------------- 19
SB-2/A23rd Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 23rd
(1) Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Unless otherwise indicated below, the persons and entity named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable. (2) The percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 18,985,000 shares of our common stock outstanding as of the date of the prospectus. (3) The control persons of RM Enterprises International, Ltd. are as follows: Deborah Metter, The Mindy Moskowitz and Steven Moskowitz Trust, The Rubin Family Irrevocable Stock Trust, Jerome and Madeline Schlanger, Frank Lazauskas, Kenneth Hubbard and Carole Klein. (4) The control person of Nexgen Holdings, Inc. is Guy Cohen. (5) The beneficiaries of The Rubin Family Irrevocable Stock Trust are Linda Rubin, Andrew Rubin and Lisa Rubin. The trust owns 2,000,000 shares of our common stock and 4.623% of the capital stock of RM Enterprises. (6) Deborah Metter, wife of Michael Metter, our President, is the beneficial owner of 169,447 shares of our common stock representing 0.8% of our issued and outstanding stock through her ownership of 1.41% of the capital stock RM Enterprises. Michael Metter disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. (7) The Mindy Moskowitz and Steven Moskowitz Trust for Mindy Moskowitz, Daniel Moskowitz, Ilana Moskowits and Gitty Moskowitz is the beneficial owner of 1,591,598 shares of our common stock representing 6.7% of our issued and outstanding stock through its ownership of 13.244% of the capital stock of RM Enterprises. Steven Moskowitz, our Secretary, disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. (8) Jerome and Madeline Schlanger, husband and wife, as joint tenants, own 8.2% of the capital stock of RM Enterprises. (9) Frank Lazauskas, a Director, owns 6.94% of the capital stock of RM Enterprises. (10) Kenneth Hubbard owns 8.2% of the capital stock of RM Enterprises. (11) Carole Klein owns 8.2% of the capital stock of RM Enterprises. (12) Roger Eichenholtz, an officer, owns 11.7% of the capital stock of RM Enterprises. 20
SB-2/A24th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 24th
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES Common Stock We are authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of common stock, $.001 par value per share, of which 18,985,000 shares are issued and outstanding as of the date of the prospectus. Each outstanding share of common stock is entitled to one vote, either in person or by proxy, on all matters that may be voted upon by their holders at meetings of the stockholders. Holders of our common stock (i) have equal ratable rights to dividends from funds legally available therefore, if declared by our board of directors; (ii) are entitled to share ratably in all of our assets available for distribution to holders of common stock upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up; (iii) do not have preemptive, subscription or conversion rights, or redemption or sinking fund provisions; and (iv) are entitled to one noncumulative vote per share on all matters on which stockholders may vote at all meetings of our stockholders. Cumulative voting for the election of directors is not provided for in our amended certificate of incorporation, which means that the holders of a majority of the shares voted can elect all of the directors then standing for election. Our certificate of incorporation provides that specified provisions may not be repealed or amended except upon the affirmative vote of the holders of not less than 2/3 of the outstanding stock entitled to vote. This provision would enable the holders of more than 1/3 of our voting stock to prevent amendments to the certificate of incorporation if they were favored by the holders of a majority of the voting stock. Preferred Stock --------------- We may, subject to limitations prescribed by Delaware law, provide for the issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of our preferred stock in one or more series, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each such series, to fix the rights, preferences and privileges of the shares of each wholly unissued series and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereon, and to increase or decrease the number of shares of any such series (but not below the number of shares of such series then outstanding) without any further vote or action by the stockholders. Our board of directors may authorize the issuance of preferred stock with voting or conversion rights that could adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the holders of our common stock. The issuance of preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could, among other things, have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control and may adversely affect the market price of the common stock and the voting and other rights of the holders of common stock. We have no current plans to issue any shares of preferred stock. 21
SB-2/A25th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 25th
Reports to Stockholders ----------------------- We intend to furnish our stockholders with annual reports containing audited financial statements as soon as practicable after the end of each fiscal year. Our fiscal year ends on May 31st. Transfer Agent -------------- We have appointed Olde Monmouth Stock Transfer Co. Inc., Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey as transfer agent for our shares of common stock. SELLING STOCKHOLDERS We are registering 4,485,000 of the shares, which were owned by our stockholders prior to the acquisition of the capital stock of Spongetech International, Ltd. We will not receive any of the proceeds from sales of shares offered under this prospectus. All costs, expenses and fees in connection with the registration of the selling stockholders' shares will be borne by us. All brokerage commissions, if any, attributable to the sale of shares by selling stockholders will be borne by selling stockholders. The following table sets forth as of the date of the prospectus: o the name of each selling stockholder; o the number of selling stockholders; o the aggregate number of shares owned by each selling stockholder; and o the number of shares each member will own after the completion of the offering made pursuant to the prospectus. Shares Owned Prior Shares Owned After Number of to the Offering the Offering Shares --------------------- ------------------ Selling Stockholder Offered Number Percent Number Percent -------------------- ----------- --------- ------- ------ ------- Shinya Araki 5,000 5,000 - -0- -0-% Neil Foley 5,000 5,000 - -0- -0-% Jean Geyer 10,000 10,000 - -0- -0-% Emma Hass 8,000 8,000 - -0- -0-% Melvin Koeller 5,000 5,000 - -0- -0-% Malcom McGuire 10,000 10,000 - -0- -0-% Sue Neil 8,000 8,000 - -0- -0-% Kevin O'Hara 8,000 8,000 - -0- -0-% Olson Jeweler 5,000 5,000 - -0- -0-% Bettye Oustz 8,000 8,000 - -0- -0-% Angelo Palmisano 5,000 5,000 - -0- -0-% Linda Chadwick 5,000 5,000 - -0- -0-% Carol Polevoy 8,000 8,000 - -0- -0-% Philip Wong 8,000 8,000 - -0- -0-% Neil Cox 8,000 8,000 - -0- -0-% Richard Blundell 10,000 10,000 - -0- -0-% 22
SB-2/A26th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 26th
Ken Heng 10,000 10,000 - -0- -0-% Donna Lutsky 5,000 5,000 - -0- -0-% Jay Lutsky 5,000 5,000 - -0- -0-% Tanna Sessions 5,000 5,000 - -0- -0-% Dean Sessions 5,000 5,000 - -0- -0-% Patsy Sessions 5,000 5,000 - -0- -0-% Michelle Brown 5,000 5,000 - -0- -0-% James John 8,000 8,000 - -0- -0-% Arden Amos 10,000 10,000 - -0- -0-% Robert Sessions 5,000 5,000 - -0- -0-% Robert Sonfield 10,000 10,000 - -0- -0-% Margot Krimmel 10,000 10,000 - -0- -0-% Bonnie Carol 10,000 10,000 - -0- -0-% Max Krimmel 10,000 10,000 - -0- -0-% Renegade Consulting 100,000 100,000 0.6% -0- -0-% Sunburst Partners 100,000 100,000 0.6% -0- -0-% Joel Pensley 775,000 775,000 4.1% -0- -0-% Falcon Crest Capital, Inc. 500,000 500,000 2.6% -0- -0-% Nexgen Holdings, Inc. 2,791,000 2,791,000 14.7% -0- -0-% 410 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 Number of stockholders: 33 Stock Purchase Agreement ------------------------ This prospectus covers 4,000,000 shares of common stock issuable to Colebrook under the stock purchase agreement. Colebrook is engaged in the business of investing in publicly-traded equity securities for its own account. Colebrook does not own any shares of our common stock. It is obligated to purchase common stock under the stock purchase agreement; it has no other commitments or arrangements to purchase or sell any of our securities. On December 16, 2002, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with Colebrook. The stock purchase agreement entitles us to issue and sell up to $2 million of our common stock to Colebrook following the effective date of this registration statement, in tranches not to exceed $50,000. We refer to each election by us to sell stock under the stock purchase agreement as a "put." We may begin exercising puts on the date of effectiveness of this prospectus and continue for a two year period. To exercise a put, we must have an effective registration statement on file with the SEC covering the resale to the public by Colebrook of any shares that it acquires under the stock purchase agreement. Also, we must give Colebrook a one trading day advance notice of the date on which we intend to exercise a particular put. The notice must indicate the number of shares of common stock we intend to sell to Colebrook and the aggregate price of the shares covered by the put. We cannot issue additional shares to Colebrook that, when added to the shares Colebrook owns will result in Colebrook holding over 9.9% of our outstanding shares upon completion of the put. Colebrook will pay us 70% of the market price for each share of our common stock under each put. Market price is defined as the average closing bid price of our common stock during the five trading days preceding the date of the notice. 23
SB-2/A27th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 27th
Limitations and Conditions to our Put Rights --------------------------------------------- Our ability to put shares of our common stock, and Colebrook's obligation to purchase the shares, is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. These conditions, among others, include: o we have satisfied all obligations under the stock purchase agreement; o our common stock is quoted and traded on the O.T.C. Bulletin Board, or listed on Nasdaq or the American Stock Exchange or an exchange; o our representations and warranties in the stock purchase agreement are accurate as of the date of each put; o we have reserved for issuance a sufficient number of shares of our common stock to satisfy our obligations to issue shares under any put; o the registration statement for the shares we will be issuing to Colebrook is effective as of the put date and no stop order with respect to the registration statement is in effect; o a minimum of seven trading days from the date of a prior put before exercising a subsequent put has passed;.and o our trading volume averages at least 25,000 shares per day during the five trading days preceding the put notice; Colebrook is not required to acquire and pay for any additional shares of our common stock once it has acquired $2 million worth of put shares. Additionally, Colebrooks is not required to acquire and pay for any shares of common stock with respect to any particular put for which, between the date we give advance notice of an intended put and the date the particular put closes: o we announce or implemente a stock split or combination of our common stock; o we pay a dividend on our common stock; o we make a distribution of all or any portion of our assets or evidences of indebtedness to the holders of our common stock; or o we consummate a major transaction, such as a sale of all or substantially all of our assets or a merger or tender or exchange offer that results in a change in control. 24
SB-2/A28th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 28th
We may not require Colebrook to purchase any put shares if: o we, or any of our directors or executive officers, have engaged in a transaction or conduct related to us that resulted in: o an SEC enforcement action, administrative proceeding or civil lawsuit; or o a civil judgment or criminal conviction or for any other offense that, if prosecuted criminally, would constitute a felony under applicable law; o we file for bankruptcy or any other proceeding for the relief of debtors; o we breach covenants contained in the stock purchase agreement. Termination ----------- We may terminate our right to initiate further puts or terminate the stock purchase agreement at any time by providing Colebrook with written notice of our intention to terminate. However, any termination will not affect any other rights or obligations we have concerning the stock purchased. Right of Indemnification ------------------------ We have agreed to indemnify Colebrook including its owners, employees, investors and agents, from all liability and losses resulting from any misrepresentations or breaches we make in connection with the stock purchase agreement or the registration statement. Effect on our Outstanding Common Stock -------------------------------------- The issuance of common stock under the stock purchase agreement will not affect the rights or privileges of existing holders of common stock except that the issuance of shares will dilute the economic and voting interests of each shareholder. We cannot determine the exact number of shares of our common stock issuable under the stock purchase agreement and the resulting dilution to our existing shareholders, which will vary with the extent to which we utilize the stock purchase agreement and the market price of our common stock. The potential effects of any dilution on our existing shareholders include the significant dilution of the current shareholders' economic and voting interests in us. The table below includes information regarding ownership of our common stock by Colebrook as of the date of the prospectus and the number of shares that it may sell under the prospectus. The actual number of shares of our common stock issuable to Colebrook under our Put rights is subject to adjustment and could be materially less or more than the amount contained in the table below, depending on factors which we cannot predict at this time, including, among other factors, the future price of our common stock. 25
SB-2/A29th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 29th
Shares Shares Percent Beneficially Beneficially of Class Owned Prior Owned After Owned to the Shares the After the Offering Offered(1) Offering Offering ------------ ---------- ------------- ---------- Colebrook, Inc. -0- 4,000,000(2) 4,000,000 -0- (1) Assumes that Colebrook will sell all of the shares of common stock it owns and will purchase all the stock offered under the securities purchase agreement. We cannot assure you that Colebrook will sell all or any of these shares. (2) Represents up to 4,000,000 shares of common stock issuable to Colebrook under the stock purchase agreement; however, we are not obligated to sell any put shares to Colebrook nor do we intend to sell any put shares to Colebrook unless it is beneficial to us. The put shares would not be deemed beneficially owned within the meaning of Sections 13(d) and 13(g) of the Exchange Act before their acquisition by Colebrook It is expected that Colebrook will not beneficially own more than 9.9% of our outstanding stock at any one time. PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION The shares covered by this prospectus may be offered and sold from time to time by the selling stockholders. The term "selling stockholders" includes donees, pledgees, transferees or other successors-in-interest selling shares received after the date of the prospectus from a selling stockholder as a gift, pledge, partnership distribution or other non-sale related transfer. Selling stockholders will act independently of us in making decisions with respect to the timing, manner and size of each sale. Sales may be made on one or more exchanges or in the over-the-counter market or otherwise, at prices and under terms then prevailing or at prices related to the then current market price or in negotiated transactions. Selling stockholders may sell their shares by one or more of, or a combination of, the following methods: o purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by such broker-dealer for its own account pursuant to the prospectus; o ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker solicits purchasers; o block trades in which the broker-dealer so engaged will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction; and o in privately negotiated transactions. In addition, any shares that qualify for sale pursuant to Rule 144 may be sold under Rule 144 rather than pursuant to the prospectus. 26
SB-2/A30th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 30th
To the extent required, the prospectus may be amended or supplemented from time to time to describe a specific plan of distribution. In connection with distributions of the shares or otherwise, the selling stockholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions. In connection with such transactions, broker-dealers or other financial institutions may engage in short sales of the common stock in the course of hedging the positions they assume with the selling stockholders. The selling stockholders may also sell their common stock short and redeliver the shares to close out such short positions. Selling stockholders may also enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions which require the delivery to such broker-dealer or other financial institution of shares offered by this prospectus, which shares such broker-dealer or other financial institution may resell pursuant to the prospectus (as supplemented or amended to reflect such transaction). Selling stockholders may also pledge shares to a broker-dealer or other financial institution, and, upon a default, such broker-dealer or other financial institution, may effect sales of the pledged shares pursuant to this prospectus (as supplemented or amended to reflect such transaction). In effecting sales, broker-dealers or agents engaged by selling stockholders may arrange for other broker-dealers to participate. Broker-dealers or agents may receive commissions, discounts or concessions from the selling stockholders in amount to be negotiated immediately prior to the sale. In offering the shares covered by the prospectus, selling stockholders and any broker-dealers who execute sales for the selling stockholders may be deemed to be "underwriters" within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with such sales. Any profits realized by selling stockholders and the compensation of any broker-dealer may be deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions. In order to comply with the securities laws of certain states, shares must be sold in such jurisdictions only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in certain states, shares may not be sold unless they have been registered or qualified for sale in the applicable state or an exemption from the registration or qualification requirement is available and is complied with. We have advised the selling stockholders that the anti-manipulation rules of Regulation M under the Exchange Act may apply to sales of shares in the market and to the activities of the selling stockholders and their affiliates. In addition, we will make copies of this prospectus available to the selling stockholders for the purpose of satisfying the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act. Selling stockholders may indemnify any broker-dealer participating in transactions involving the sale of the shares against certain liabilities, including liabilities arising under the Securities Act. At the time a particular offer of shares is made, if required, a prospectus supplement will be distributed that will set forth the number of shares being offered and the terms of the offering, including the name of any underwriter, dealer or agent, the purchase price paid by any underwriter, any discount, commission and other item constituting compensation, any discount, commission or concession allowed or reallowed or paid to any dealer, and the proposed selling price to the public. We have agreed to indemnify the selling stockholders against certain liabilities, including certain liabilities under the Securities Act. 27
SB-2/A31st Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 31st
We have agreed with the selling stockholders to keep the registration statement of which this prospectus constitutes a part effective until the earlier of: o such time as all of the shares covered by this prospectus have been disposed of pursuant to and in accordance with the Registration Statement or o two years from the effective date of the registration statement. SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE Upon the effectiveness of the registration statement, 4,485,000 shares of common stock owned by our stockholders, will be freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act. None of these shares are held by our "affiliates" as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. We have outstanding 18,985,000 shares of our common stock. Shares of our common stock held by affiliates will be eligible for sale in the public market, subject to certain volume limitations and the expiration of applicable holding periods under Rule 144 under the Securities Act. In general, under Rule 144, persons who have beneficially owned restricted shares for at least one year are entitled to sell within any three-month period a number of shares which does not exceed the greater of 1% of the number of shares of common stock then outstanding (which will equal approximately 189,850 shares) or the average weekly trading volume of the common stock during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a Form 144 with the SEC relating to sales of common stock. Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about us. Under Rule 144(k), a person who has not been one of our affiliates at any time during the three months preceding a sale, and who has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least two years, is entitled to sell such shares without complying with the manner of sale, public information, volume limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144. We can offer no assurance that an active public market in our shares will develop. Future sales of substantial amounts of our shares (including shares issued upon exercise of outstanding options) in the public market could adversely affect market prices prevailing from time to time and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of our equity securities. WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION We have not previously been required to comply with the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act. We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form SB-2 to register the securities offered by the prospectus. The prospectus is part of the registration statement, and, as permitted by the SEC's rules, does not contain all of the information in the registration statement. For further information about us and the securities offered under the prospectus, you may refer to the registration statement and to the exhibits and schedules filed as a part of the registration statement. You can review the registration statement and its exhibits at the public reference facility maintained by the SEC at Judiciary Plaza, Room 1024, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference facility. The registration statement is also available electronically on the World Wide Web at http://www.sec.gov. 28
SB-2/A32nd Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 32nd
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS We are not a party to nor are we aware of any existing, pending or threatened lawsuits or other legal actions. LEGAL MATTERS Certain legal matters, including the legality of the issuance of the shares of common stock offered herein, are being passed upon for us by our counsel, Joel Pensley, Esq., 211 Schoolhouse Road, Norfolk, Connecticut 06058. Mr. Pensley is the beneficial owner of 775,000 shares of our common stock; he is also the beneficial owner of Renegade Consulting, Inc., the holder of 100,000 shares. EXPERTS Our financial statements for the years ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 have been included herein and in the registration statement in reliance upon the report of DDK & Company LLP, New York, New York, independent certified public accountants, appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of DDK & Company LLP as experts in accounting and auditing. 29
SB-2/A33rd Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 33rd
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT THREE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2002 (unaudited) AND 2001 (unaudited) AND YEARs ENDED MAY 31, 2002 AND 2001 PAGE ---- INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT F 2 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BALANCE SHEETS AS OF AUGUST 31, 2002 (unaudited) AND MAY 31, 2002 3 STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS - THREE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2002 (unaudited) AND 2001 (unaudited) AND YEARS ENDED MAY 31, 2002 AND 2001 4 STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICEINCY) - THREE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2002 (unaudited) and YEARS ENDED MAY 31, 2002 AND 2001 5 STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - THREE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2002 (unaudited) AND 2001 (unaudited) AND YEARS ENDED MAY 31, 2002 AND 2001 6 - 7 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 8 -17 F-1
SB-2/A34th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 34th
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Board of Directors Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. and Subsidiary We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. and Subsidiary as of May 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity (deficiency), and cash flows for the years ended May 31, 2002 and 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. and Subsidiary as of May 31, 2002, and the consolidated results of its operations and its consolidated cash flows for the years ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred net losses of approximately $102,000 and $198,000 for the years ended May 31, 2002 and 2001. At May 31, 2002, current liabilities exceed current assets by approximately $137,000, and total liabilities exceed total assets by approximately $149,000. These factors create substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The recovery of assets and continuation of future operations are dependent upon the Company's ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing and its ability to generate revenues sufficient to continue pursuing its business purposes. (See note 9). August 15, 2002 /s/DDK & Company LLP DDK & Company LLP F-2
SB-2/A35th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 35th
SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS August 31, May 31, 2002 2002 ----------- --------- (unaudited) ASSETS Current Assets Cash $ 97 $ 175 Accounts receivable 545 - Inventories 48,020 49,357 Due from related parties 10,384 118 ---------- --------- Total current assets 59,046 49,650 Property and equipment, at cost, less accumulated depreciation of $12,649 and $9,218 as of August 31, 2002 and May 31, 2002, respectively 36,552 39,983 Deferred offering costs 4,000 - ---------- ---------- Total assets $ 99,598 $ 89,633 ========== ========== LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY) Current Liabilities Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 168,355 $ 158,865 Note payable - related party 28,015 27,390 Income taxes payable 1,600 400 Due to related parties 4,740 - ------- ------- Total current liabilities 202,710 186,655 Due to related party 51,930 51,930 -------- -------- Total liabilities 254,640 238,585 -------- -------- Shareholders' Equity (Deficiency) Common stock, $.001 par value; authorized 50,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 18,985,000 and 12,000,000 shares as of August 31, 2002 and May 31, 2002, respectively 18,985 12,000 Preferred stock $.001 par value; authorized 5,000,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding - - Additional paid-in capital 190,448 192,043 Deficit (364,475) (352,995) --------- --------- Total shareholders' equity (deficiency) (155,042) (148,952) --------- --------- Total liabilities and shareholders' equity (deficiency) $ 99,598 $ 89,633 ========= ======== See notes to consolidated financial statements. F-3
SB-2/A36th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 36th
SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS Three Months Ended August 31, Year Ended May 31, --------------------- --------------------- 2002 2001 2002 2001 --------- ---------- -------- -------- (unaudited)(unaudited) Sales $ 8,797 $ 15,669 $ 89,973 $ 11,790 Cost of goods sold 1,337 14,804 121,643 31,683 -------- --------- --------- --------- Gross profit (loss) 7,460 865 (31,670) (19,893) -------- --------- ---------- ---------- Operating expenses Selling 176 13,601 15,982 50,416 General and administrative 17,238 12,006 51,711 127,034 Interest 1,126 735 2,714 547 ------ ------ ------ -------- 18,540 26,342 70,407 177,997 -------- --------- ---------- ---------- Loss before provision for income taxes (11,080) (25,477) (102,077) (197,890) Income taxes 400 373 400 428 -------- -------- ---------- --------- Net loss $ (11,480) $ (25,850) $ (102,477) $ (198,318) ========= ======== ========= ========== Basic and diluted (loss) per common stock Net loss per share - basic and diluted NIL NIL $ (.01) $ (.02) ========= ======== ========= ========== Weighted average common shares outstanding 15,644,348 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 ========== ========== ========== ========== See notes to consolidated financial statements. F-4
SB-2/A37th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 37th
SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY) Three Months Ended August 31, 2002 (Unaudited) and Years Ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 [Enlarge/Download Table] Total Additional Shareholder's Number of Capital Paid-In Equity Shares Stock Capital Deficit (Deficiency) --------- ------- ---------- ------- -------------- Balance - June 1, 2000 12,000,000 $ 12,000 $ - $ (52,200) $ (40,200) Net loss for year ended May 31, 2001 - - - (198,318) (198,318) ---------- ------- ------- --------- --------- 12,000,000 12,000 - (250,518) (238,518) Contributions - - 105,100 - 105,100 ---------- ------- ------- --------- --------- Balance - May 31, 2001 12,000,000 12,000 105,100 (250,518) (133,418) Net loss for year ended May 31, 2002 - - - (102,477) (102,477) ---------- ------- ------- --------- --------- 12,000,000 12,000 105,100 (352,995) (235,895) Contributions - - 86,943 - 86,943 ---------- ------ ------- -------- --------- Balance - May 31, 2002 12,000,000 12,000 192,043 (352,995) (148,952) Issuance of common stock 6,985,000 6,985 (1,595) - 5,390 Net loss for three months ended August 31, 2002 - - - (11,480) (11,480) ---------- --------- --------- ---------- ----------- Balance - August 31, 2002 18,985,000 $ 18,985 $ 190,448 $(364,475) $ (155,042) ========== ======== ========= ========== =========== See notes to consolidated financial statements. F-5
SB-2/A38th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 38th
SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS [Enlarge/Download Table] Three Months Ended Year Ended August 31, May 31, ------------------ -------------- 2002 2001 2002 2001 ---------- ----------- --------- ---------- (unaudited) (unaudited) ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Operating Activities Net loss $ (11,480) $ (25,850) $ (102,477) $ (198,318) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities Bad debts - - 13,909 - Depreciation 3,431 2,076 8,308 1,241 Interest expense added to loan principal 625 625 2,390 - Changes in operating assets and liabilities Accounts receivable (545) - (13,909) 894 Inventories 1,337 (26,867) (47,164) 19,861 Prepaid expense and other current assets - 259 259 (259) Accounts payable and accrued expenses 9,490 56,994 95,399 47,714 Income tax payable 400 400 - - Due to related parties (3,336) - - 12,971 --------- --------- --------- --------- Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (78) 7,637 (43,285) (115,896) --------- --------- --------- --------- Investing Activities Acquisition of property and equipment - (33,540) (33,540) (14,900) --------- --------- --------- --------- Net cash used in investing activities - (33,540) (33,540) (14,900) --------- --------- --------- --------- See notes to consolidated financial statements. F-6
SB-2/A39th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 39th
SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued) [Enlarge/Download Table] Three Months Ended Year Ended August 31, May 31, ------------------- ------------------- 2002 2001 2002 2001 --------- --------- ------- --------- (unaudited) (unaudited) ---------- ----------- -------- ---------- Financing Activities Proceeds of note payable - related party - - - 25,000 Proceeds from additional paid-in capital - 26,850 76,943 105,100 --------- --------- -------- --------- Net cash provided by financing activities - 26,850 76,943 130,100 --------- --------- -------- --------- Net increase (decrease) in cash (78) 947 118 (696) Cash - beginning 175 57 57 753 --------- --------- -------- --------- Cash - end $ 97 $ 1,004 $ 175 $ 57 ========= ========= ======== ========== Supplemental Information Interest paid $ 500 $ - $ 110 $ 547 Income taxes paid $ - $ - $ - $ - Noncash Transactions Assets abandoned $ - $ - $ - $ 1,991 Parent company debt contributed to additional paid-in capital $ - $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ - Issuance of common stock $ 5,390 $ - $ - $ - See notes to consolidated financial statements. F-7
SB-2/A40th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 40th
SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years Ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 and Three Months Ended August 31, 2002 (Unaudited) 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Nature of Operations Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. ("SDS"), formerly known as Nexgen Acquisitions VIII, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was incorporated on February 5, 2002. At May 31, 2002, SDS was inactive. On July 15, 2002, SDS acquired all the outstanding shares of Spongetech International, Ltd. ("SIL") (formerly RSI Enterprises, Inc. and Romantic Scents, Inc.), a New York corporation, incorporated on July 18, 1999. SIL has developed a line of hydrophilic polyurethane auto, bath, beauty and home applicators and has commenced distribution of its automotive product. Basis of Presentation / Going Concern The consolidated financial statements have been prepared for purposes of registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SDS, the registrant, and its wholly-owned subsidiary SIL (collectively, the "Company") with all significant intercompany accounts and transactions eliminated, and have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern. However, the Company has sustained substantial operating losses in recent years, current liabilities exceed current assets, and total liabilities exceed total assets. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The recovery of assets and continuation of future operations are dependent upon the Company's ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing and its ability to generate revenues sufficient to continue pursuing its business purposes. The Company is actively pursuing financing to fund future operations. Interim Financial Information (Unaudited) The interim financial statements of the Company as of August 31, 2002 and for the three months ended August 31, 2002 and 2001, included herein, have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. The unaudited interim financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations relating to interim financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited statements reflect all adjustments necessary to present fairly the results of its operations and its cash flows for the three months ended August 31, 2002 and 2001. F-8
SB-2/A41st Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 41st
SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years Ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 and Three Months Ended August 31, 2002 (Unaudited) 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Accounts Receivable Accounts receivable have been adjusted for all known uncollectible accounts. Inventories Finished products inventories are carried at cost, principally first-in, first-out, but not in excess of market. Property and Equipment Property and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation has been provided using straight-line and accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred, and renewals and betterments are capitalized. Deferred Income Taxes The Company recognizes deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the expected future income tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the income tax bases of assets and liabilities and the effect of future income tax planning strategies to reduce any deferred income tax liability. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates. Deferred Offering Costs Deferred offering costs incurred by the Company in connection with the proposed registration statement will be offset against additional paid-in capital upon the completion of the registration, if successful, or charged to operations if abandoned. Advertising Costs Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. For the years ended May 31, 2002 and 2001, advertising costs totaled $3,700 and $26,900, respectively. For the three months ended August 31, 2002 and 2001, no advertising costs were incurred. F-9
SB-2/A42nd Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 42nd
SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years Ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 and Three Months Ended August 31, 2002 (Unaudited) 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Shipping and Handling Costs Shipping costs are included in selling expenses. For the years ended May 31, 2002 and 2001, shipping costs totaled $2,726 and $644, respectively. For the three months ended August 31, 2002 and 2001, shipping costs totaled $- and $56, respectively. Net Income (Loss) Per Share Per share data has been computed and presented pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 128, earnings per share. Net income (loss) per common share - basic is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Net income (loss) per common share - diluted is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares and common equivalent shares for stock options outstanding during the period. Recent Accounting Pronouncements New accounting statements issued, and adopted by the Company, include the following: In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement No. 141, "Business Combinations" ("SFAS 141"), which requires all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. As a result, use of the pooling-of-interests method is prohibited for business combinations initiated thereafter. SFAS 141 also establishes criteria for the separate recognition of intangible assets acquired in a business combination. The adoption of SFAS 141 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows In July 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS 142"), which requires that goodwill and certain other intangible assets having indefinite lives no longer be amortized to earnings, but instead be subject to periodic testing for impairment. Intangible assets determined to have definitive lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. This Statement is effective for the Company's 2003 fiscal year. However, goodwill and intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001 are subject immediately to the non-amortization and amortization provisions of this Statement. The adoption of SFAS 142 did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. F-10
SB-2/A43rd Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 43rd
SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years Ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 and Three Months Ended August 31, 2002 (Unaudited) 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Continued) In August 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" ("SFAS 143"), which provides the accounting requirements for retirement obligations associated with tangible long-lived assets. This Statement requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred. This Statement is effective for the Company's 2003 fiscal year, and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of SFAS 143 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. In October 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" ("SFAS 144"), which excludes from the definition of long-lived assets goodwill and other intangibles that are not amortized in accordance with SFAS 142. SFAS 144 requires that long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale be measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell, whether reported in continuing operations or in discontinued operations. SFAS 144 also expands the reporting of discontinued operations to include components of an entity that have been or will be disposed of rather than limiting such discontinuance to a segment of a business. This Statement is effective for the Company's 2003 fiscal year, and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of SFAS 144 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. 2 - Property and Equipment Property and equipment is summarized as follows: Estimated Useful Lives - August 31, May 31, Years 2002 2002 ------------ ---------- --------- (unaudited) Furniture and fixtures 5 - 7 $ 761 $ 761 Machinery and equipment 5 - 7 10,128 10,128 Molds 5 38,312 38,31 -------- -------- 49,201 49,201 Less: Accumulated depreciation 12,649 9,218 --------- -------- $ 36,552 $ 39,983 ========= ======== Depreciation expense for the years ended May 31, 2002 and 20001 was $8,308 and $1,241, respectively. Depreciation expense for the three months ended August 31, 2002 and 2001 was $3,431 and $2,077, respectively. F-11
SB-2/A44th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 44th
SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years Ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 and Three Months Ended August 31, 2002 (Unaudited) 3 - Stock Purchase Agreement On July 15, 2002, SDS entered into an agreement with RM Enterprises International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, to acquire its wholly-owned subsidiary SIL. On that date, SDS acquired all of the common stock of SIL for 12,000,000 shares of its $.001 par value common stock. The transaction was structured as a tax free exchange and was accounted for as a reverse acquisition, using the purchase method of accounting. The following are the proforma financial statements as of May 31, 2002 and for the year then ended, and the income statement for the three months ended August 31, 2002: [Enlarge/Download Table] May 31, 2002 RSI Nexgen Enterprises, Acquisitions Proforma Proforma Inc. VIII, Inc. Adjustments Combined ------------ ------------ ----------- ---------- ASSETS Current Assets Cash $ 175 $ - $ - $ 175 Inventories 49,357 - - 49,357 Due from affiliate - 2,190 - 2,190 Due from related parties 118 - - 118 ------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total current assets 49,650 2,190 - 51,840 Property, plant, and equipment, net 39,983 - - 39,983 ------------- --------- ----------- ------------ Total assets $ 89,633 $ 2,190 $ - $ 91,823 ============= ========= =========== ============ LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY (DEFICIENCY) Current Liabilities Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 158,865 $ - $ - $ 158,865 Note payable - related party 27,390 - - 27,390 Income taxes payable 400 400 - 800 ------------ ---------- ---------- ----------- Total current liabilities 186,655 400 - 187,055 Due to related party 51,930 - - 51,930 ------------ --------- --------- ---------- Total liabilities 238,585 400 - 238,985 ============ ========= ========= =========== F-12
SB-2/A45th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 45th
SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years Ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 and Three Months Ended August 31, 2002 (Unaudited) [Enlarge/Download Table] 3 - Stock Purchase Agreement (Continued) Shareholders' Equity (Deficiency) Common stock, stated at par value 12,000 6,010 - 18,010 Additional paid-in capital 192,043 1,971 (6,191) 187,823 Deficit (352,995) (6,191) 6,191 (352,995) ------------ --------- ---------- ----------- Total shareholders' equity (deficiency) (148,952) 1,790 - (147,162) ------------ --------- --------- ---------- Total liabilities and shareholders' equity (deficiency) $ 89,633 $ 2,190 $ - $ 91,823 ============ ========== ========= =========== Year Ended May 31, 2002 RSI Nexgen Enterprises, Acquisitions Proforma Proforma Inc. VIII, Inc. Adjustments Combined ------------- ------------- ----------- -------- Sales $ 89,973 $ - $ - $ 89,973 Cost of goods sold 121,643 - - 121,643 ---------- -------- ------ ---------- Gross profit (loss) (31,670) - - (31,670) ---------- -------- ------ ---------- Operating expenses Selling 15,982 - - 15,982 General and administrative 51,711 5,791 - 57,502 Interest 2,714 - - 2,714 ---------- -------- ------ ---------- 70,407 5,791 - 76,198 ---------- -------- ------ ---------- Loss before provision for income taxes (102,077) (5,791) - (107,868) Income taxes 400 400 - 800 ---------- -------- ------ ---------- Net loss $ (102,477) $ (6,191) $ - $ (108,668) ========== ========= ====== =========== F-13
SB-2/A46th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 46th
SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years Ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 and Three Months Ended August 31, 2002 (Unaudited) 3 - Stock Purchase Agreement (Continued) Three Months Ended August 31, 2002 (Unaudited) RSI Nexgen Enterprises, Acquisitions Proforma Proforma Inc. VIII, Inc. Adjustments Combined ------------ ------------ ----------- -------- Sales $ 8,797 $ - $ - $ 8,797 Cost of goods sold 1,337 - - 1,337 -------- ------ ------ ---------- Gross profit (loss) 7,460 - - 7,460 -------- ------ ------ ---------- Operating expenses Selling 176 - - 176 General and administrative 17,238 5,775 - 23,013 Interest 1,126 - - 1,126 -------- ------ ------ ---------- 18,540 5,775 - 24,315 -------- ------ ------ ---------- Loss before provision for income taxes (11,080) (5,775) - (16,855) Income taxes 400 400 - 800 --------- -------- ------ ---------- Net loss $ (11,480) $(6,175) $ - $ (17,655) ======== ======== ====== ========== 4 - Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following: August 31, May 31, 2002 2002 (unaudited) ----------- --------- Purchases $ 112,018 $ 112,018 American Express - charge card 17,882 19,622 Professional fees 33,978 22,748 Freight charges 3,394 3,394 Other 1,083 1,083 --------- ---------- $ 168,355 $ 158,865 ========= ========== F-14
SB-2/A47th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 47th
SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years Ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 and Three Months Ended August 31, 2002 (Unaudited) 5 - Note Payable - Related Party During the year ended May 31, 2001, a relative of one of the parent company's shareholders loaned $25,000 to the Company. The note bears interest at 10% per annum and is payable upon demand. Related interest expense for the years ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 was $2,500 and $547, respectively, and for the three months ended August 31, 2002 and 2001 was $625 and $625, respectively. At August 31, 2002 and May 31, 2002, unpaid interest of $625 and $2,390, respectively, has been added to the loan principal. 6 - Related Party Transactions The Company shares its facility with other related businesses. Expenses incurred in the operations of the facility, including rent, telephone, and other office expenses, were allocated to the various businesses. The allocations were based on usage. Management believes these allocations are reasonable. At August 31, 2002 and May 31, 2002, the Company has a non-interest bearing liability, aggregating $51,930, payable to one of these related parties. At May 31, 2002, the related party agreed to extend the maturity date to January 2004. Accordingly, this liability has been reclassified as long-term debt. At May 31, 2001, the Company has a non-interest bearing liability to its parent of $10,000, which was contributed to additional paid-in capital during the year ended May 31, 2002. 7 - Additional Paid-in Capital During the years ended May 31, 2002 and 2001, SIL's former parent contributed $86,943 and $105,100, respectively, as additional paid-in capital. F-15
SB-2/A48th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 48th
SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years Ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 and Three Months Ended August 31, 2002 (Unaudited) 8 - Deferred Income Taxes At August 31, 2002 and May 31, 2002, the Company has approximately $363,000 and $351,000, respectively, of net operating loss carryforwards available, which expire in various years through May 31, 2022. The significant component of the Company's deferred tax asset as of August 31, 2002 and May 31, 2002 is as follows: August 31, May 31, 2002 2002 ----------- --------- (unaudited) Non-Current Net operating loss carryforwards $ 163,000 $ 158,000 Valuation allowance for deferred tax asset 163,000 158,000 ---------- ---------- $ - $ - ========== ========== SFAS No. 109 requires a valuation allowance to be recorded when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. At August 31, 2002 and May 31, 2002, a valuation allowance for the full amount of the net deferred tax asset was recorded. The reconciliation of reported income tax expense (benefit) to the amount of income tax expense that would result from applying domestic federal income taxes at the statutory rate is as follows: August 31, May 31, 2002 2002 ----------- ---------- (unaudited) Statutory federal income tax (benefit) $ (4,000) $ (35,000) State and local income tax (benefit) - net of federal benefit (1,000) (12,000) Valuation allowance 5,000 47,000 ---------- ----------- $ - $ - ========== =========== F-16
SB-2/A49th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 49th
SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years Ended May 31, 2002 and 2001 and Three Months Ended August 31, 2002 (Unaudited) 9 - Supply and License Agreements In July 2001, the Company entered into a supply and requirement agreement with Dicon Technologies ("Dicon"), a manufacturing company that has technological know-how and patented and proprietary information relating to hydrophilic foam materials (sponges) and their applications. The agreement, which expires after three years provides for two renewal periods, requires the Company to purchase all of their requirement from Dicon, and Dicon grants exclusive worldwide rights to distribute the products. Minimum annual purchase requirements are set forth in the agreement. The Company has satisfied the minimum purchase requirement for the first year. The Company and Dicon have also entered into an exclusive license agreement for certain molded hydrophilic foam products which the Company helped develop, with super absorbent polymer and detergent soaps and waxes used for the cleaning and polishing of land, sea and transportation vehicles. The term of the agreement is for the full life of any design patent, which may be issued on the molded sponge design. 10 - Subsequent Events As part of a plan of recapitilization and funding, the Company undertook a series of steps as follows: In December 2002, the SDS and its subsidiary each merged into a newly formed Delaware corporation. The surviving corporation changed its name to Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc.("Spongetech"). On December 26, 2002, Spongetech entered into a securities purchase agreement. The agreement entitles Spongetech to issue up to $2 million of its common stock from time to time, in blocks of between $25,000 to $50,000 each, at a price per share calculated by a formula based on Spongetech's stock price. The securities purchase agreement terminates two years following the effective date of the registration of the shares. Proceeds of stock sales will be used for working capital. 9 - Supply and License Agreements In July 2001, the Company entered into a supply and requirement agreement with Dicon Technologies ("Dicon"), a manufacturing company that has technological know-how and patented and proprietary information relating to hydrophilic foam materials (sponges) and their applications. The agreement, which renews annually, requires the Company to purchase all of its requirement from Dicon, and Dicon grants exclusive worldwide rights to distribute the products. Minimum annual purchase requirements are set forth in the agreement. The Company has satisfied the minimum purchase requirement for the first year. The Company and Dicon have also entered into an exclusive license agreement for certain molded hydrophilic foam products which the Company helped develop, with super absorbent polymer and detergent soaps and waxes used for the cleaning and polishing of land, sea and transportation vehicles. The term of the agreement is for the full life of any design patent which may be issued on the molded sponge design. 10 - Subsequent Events As part of a plan of recapitilization and funding, the Company undertook a series of steps as follows: In December 2002, the Company and its subsidiary each merged into a newly formed Delaware corporation. The surviving corporation charged its name to Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. On December 26, 2002, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement. The agreement entitles the Company to issue up to $2 million of its common stock from time to time, in blocks of between $25,000 to $50,000 each, at a price per share calculated by a formula based on the Company's stock price. The securities purchase agreement terminates two years following the effective date of the registration of the shares. Proceeds will be used for working capital. F-17
SB-2/A50th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 50th
WE HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED ANYONE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION DIFFERENT FROM THAT CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS. THE SELLING STOCKHOLDERS LISTED IN THIS PROSPECTUS ARE OFFERING TO SELL, SHARES OF COMMON STOCK ONLY IN JURISDICTIONS WHERE OFFERS AND SALES ARE PERMITTED. Until --------, all dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers' obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions. SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. 4,485,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK UP TO 4,000,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK ____________________ PROSPECTUS ____________________ -------- ----, 2003
SB-2/A51st Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 51st
PART II INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS ITEM 24. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS. The Delaware General Corporation Law provides for the indemnification of the officers, directors and corporate employees and agents of Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. (the "Registrant") under certain circumstances as follows: INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS; INSURANCE. (a) A corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful. (b) A corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against expenses (including attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation and except that no indemnification shall be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the Court of Chancery or the court in which such action or suit was brought shall determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all the circumstance of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the Court of Chancery or such court shall deem proper. (c) To the extent that a director, officer, employee or agent of a corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to in subsections (a) and (b) of this section, or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, he shall be indemnified against expenses (including attorney's fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection therewith. II-1
SB-2/A52nd Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 52nd
(d) Any indemnification under subsections (a) and (b) of this section (unless ordered by a court) shall be made by the corporation only as authorized in the specific case upon a determination that indemnification of the director, officer, employee or agent is proper in the circumstances because he has met the applicable standard of conduct set forth in subsections (a) and (b) of this section. Such determination shall be made (1) by the board of directors by a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to such action, suit or proceeding, or (2) if such a quorum is not obtainable, or, even if obtainable a quorum of disinterested directors so directs, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion, or (3) by the stockholders. (e) Expenses incurred by an officer or director in defending any civil, criminal, administrative or investigative action, suit or proceeding may be paid by the corporation in advance of the final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such director to repay such amount if it shall ultimately be determined that he is not entitled to be indemnified by the corporation as authorized in this section. Such expenses including attorneys' fees incurred by other employees and agents may be so paid upon such terms and conditions, if any, as the board of directors deems appropriate. (f) The indemnification and advancement expenses provided by, or granted pursuant to, the other subsections of this section shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those seeking indemnification or advancement expenses may be entitled under any by-law, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, both as to action in his official capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such office. (g) A corporation shall have power to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against any liability asserted against him and incurred by him in any such capacity or arising out of his status as such, whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify him against such liability under this section. (h) For purposes of this Section, references to "the corporation" shall include, in addition to the resulting corporation, any constituent corporation (including any constituent of a constituent) absorbed in a consolidation or merger which, if its separate existence had continued, would have had power and authority to indemnify its directors, officers and employees or agents so that any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of such constituent corporation, or is or was serving at the request of such constituent corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, shall stand in the same position under this section with respect to the resulting or surviving corporation as he would have with respect to such constituent corporation as he would have with respect to such constituent corporation if its separate existence had continued. II-2
SB-2/A53rd Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 53rd
(i) For purposes of this section, references to "other enterprises" shall include employee benefit plans; references to "fines" shall include any excise taxes assessed on a person with respect to an employee benefit plan; and references to "serving at the request of the corporation" shall include any service as a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation which imposes duties on, or involves services by, such director, officer, employee, or agent with respect to an employee benefit plan, its participants, or beneficiaries; and a person who acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries of an employee benefit plan shall be deemed to have acted in a manner "not opposed to the best interests of the corporation" as referred to in this section. (j) The indemnification and advancement of expenses provided by, or granted pursuant to, this section shall, unless otherwise provided when authorized or ratified, continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee or agent and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, and administrators of such person. Articles Eighth and Ninth of the Registrant's certificate of incorporation provide as follows: EIGHTH The personal liability of the directors of the Corporation is hereby eliminated to the fullest extent permitted by the provisions of paragraph (7) of subsection (b) of Section 102 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, as the same may be amended and supplemented. NINTH The Corporation shall, to the fullest extent permitted by the provisions of Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, as the same may be amended and supplemented, indemnify any and all persons whom it shall have power to indemnify under said section from and against any and all of the expenses, liabilities or other matters referred to in or covered by said section, and the indemnification provided for herein shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those indemnified may be entitled under any by-law, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, both as to action in his official capacity and as to action In another capacity while holding such office, and shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee or agent and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of such a person. The foregoing right of indemnification shall in no way be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which such person may be entitled under any by-law, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors, or otherwise. Article XII of the Registrant's by-laws provides as follows: ARTICLE XII--INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS 1. Indemnification. The corporation shall indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, trustee, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, trustee, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines II-3
SB-2/A54th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 54th
and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe such person's conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, by itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner which the person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interest of the corporation, and with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had reasonable cause to believe that such person's conduct was lawful. 2. Derivative Action. The corporation shall indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in the corporation's favor by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, trustee, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, trustee, officer, employee or agent of any other corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation; provided, however, that no indemnification shall be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable for gross negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of such person's duty to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the court in which such action or suit was brought shall determine upon application that, despite circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses as such court shall deem proper. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, by itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner which the person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interest of the corporation. 3. Successful Defense. To the extent that a director, trustee, officer, employee or agent of the corporation has been successful, on the merits or otherwise, in whole or in part, in defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, such person shall be indemnified against expenses (including attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection therewith. 4. Authorization. Any indemnification under paragraph 1 and 2 above (unless ordered by a court) shall be made by the corporation only as authorized in the specific case upon a determination that indemnification of the director, trustee, officer, employee or agent is proper in the circumstances because such person has met the applicable standard of conduct set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above. Such determination shall be made (a) by the board of directors by a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to such action, suit or proceeding, (b) by independent legal counsel (selected by one or more of the directors, whether or not a quorum and whether or not disinterested) in a written opinion, or (c) by the stockholders. Anyone making such a determination under this paragraph 4 may determine that a person has met the standards therein set forth as to some claims, issues or matters but not as to others, and may reasonably prorate amounts to be paid as indemnification. II-4
SB-2/A55th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 55th
5. Advances. Expenses incurred in defending civil or criminal actions, suits or proceedings shall be paid by the corporation, at any time or from time to time in advance of the final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding as authorized in the manner provided in paragraph 4 above upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director, trustee, officer, employee or agent to repay such amount unless it shall ultimately be determined by the corporation that the payment of expenses is authorized in this Section. 6. Nonexclusivity. The indemnification provided in this Section shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those indemnified may be entitled under any law, by-law, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested director or otherwise, both as to action in such person's official capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such office, and shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director, trustee, officer, employee or agent and shall insure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, and administrators of such a person. 7. Insurance. The Corporation shall have the power to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, trustee, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, trustee, officer, employee or agent of any corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against any liability assessed against such person in any such capacity or arising out of such person's status as such, whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify such person against such liability. 8. "Corporation" Defined. For purpose of this action, references to the "corporation" shall include, in addition to the corporation, any constituent corporation (including any constituent of a constituent) absorbed in a consolidation or merger which, if its separate existence had continued, would have had the power and authority to indemnify its directors, trustees, officers, employees or agents, so that any person who is or was a director, trustee, officer, employee or agent of such of constituent corporation will be considered as if such person was a director, trustee, officer, employee or agent of the corporation. ITEM 25. EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION. The other expenses paid or payable by the Registrant in connection with the issuance and distribution of the securities being registered are estimated as follows: Securities and Exchange Commission Registration Fee............. $ 300 Legal Fees...................................................... 7,750* Accounting Fees................................................. 20,000 Printing and Engraving.......................................... 1,000 Blue Sky Qualification Fees and Expenses........................ 1,000 Transfer Agent Fee.............................................. 1,000 Miscellaneous................................................... 1,000 -------- Total.................................................... $ 32,050 -------- * Counsel was issued 775,000 shares of common stock for legal services in connection with the registration statement related legal matters. =========== II-5
SB-2/A56th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 56th
ITEM 26. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES. We were incorporated in New York State on July 18, 1999. On July 15, 2002, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with Nexgen Acquisitions VIII, Inc. under which our sole stockholder, RM Enterprises International, received 12,000,000 shares of the holding company and became its majority stockholder. Nexgen Acquisitions VIII, Inc. was formed on February 5, 2002. On April 24, 2002, it issued 5,791,000 shares of its common stock to Nexgen Holdings, Inc., in consideration of expense reimbursement and provision of office space. In June, 2002, it issued 775,000 shares to Joel Pensley, Esq. for legal services, 100,000 shares to Sunburst Partners, Inc. for consulting services and 100,000 shares to Renegade Consulting, Inc., benefically owned by Joel Pensley, for consulting services. In June, 2002, it accepted subscriptions from 30 people at $.01 per share of an aggregate of 219,000 shares. On December 16, 2002, we changed our domicile to Delaware. On December 16, 2002, Nexgen Acquisitions VIII, Inc. (renamed Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc.) merged with and into us so that we becamse the surviving company. Immediately subsequent to the merger, we changed our name to Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. These securities were sold under the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. Neither the Registrant nor any person acting on its behalf offered or sold the securities by means of any form of general solicitation or general advertising. All purchasers represented in writing that they acquired the securities for their own accounts. A legend was placed on the stock certificates stating that the securities have not been registered under the Securities Act and cannot be sold or otherwise transferred without an effective registration or an exemption therefrom. ITEM 28. UNDERTAKINGS. The Registrant undertakes: (1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, post-effective amendment to this registration statement (the "Registration Statement"): (i) To include any prospectus required by Section 10 (a) (3) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"); (ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the Effective Date of the Registration Statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the Registration Statement; (iii)To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the Registration Statement or any material change to such information in this registration statement, including (but not limited to) the addition of an underwriter. To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the "Calculation of Registration Fee" table in the effective registration statement. II-6
SB-2/A57th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 57th
To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement; (2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be treated as a new registration statement of the securities offered, and the offering of the securities at that time to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. (3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to any provisions contained in its Certificate of Incorporation, or by-laws, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. II-7
SB-2/A58th Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 58th
SIGNATURES In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant certified that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements of the filing on Form SB-2 and authorized the registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, in Brooklyn, New York. SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. January 13, 2003 By: /s/ Michael Metter ---------------------------- Michael Metter President, Chief Executive Officer January 13, 2003 By: /s/ Roger Eichenholtz --------------------------- Roger Eichenholtz Chief Financial Officer Chief Accounting Officer In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registration statement was signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates stated. SIGNATURE TITLE DATED ------------------------- --------------------------- ------------------ /s/Michael Metter --------------------- Michael Metter President January 13, 2003 Chief Executive Officer and a Director /s/Steven Moskowitz --------------------- Steven Moskowitz Secretary and a Director January 13, 2003 /s/ Jerome Schlanger --------------------- Jerome Schlanger Treasurer and a Director January 13, 2003 /s/Frank Lazauskas --------------------- Frank Lazauskas A Director January 13, 2003 II-8
SB-2/ALast Page of 59TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 59th
EXHIBIT INDEX EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ------- ----------- 3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Nexgen VIII, Inc.* 3.2 Certificate of Amendment of Nexgen VIII, Inc. changing name to Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc.* 3.3 By-Laws of Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc.* 3.4 Certificate of Incorporation of Romantic Scents, Inc. 3.5 Certificate of Amendment changing name of Romantic Scents, Inc. to RSI Enterprises, Inc. 3.7 Certificate of Amendment change name of RSI Enterprises, Inc. to Spongetech Enterprises Internatioal, Inc. 3.6 Certificate of Incorporation of Merger Sub, Inc. 3.7 Merger Certificate between Spongetech Delivery Systems and Merger Sub, Inc. 3.8 Merger Certificate between Spongetech Enterprises International, Inc. and Merger Sub, Inc. 3.9 Certificate of Amendment Changing name of Merger Sub, Inc. to Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. 4.1 Specimen Certificate of Common Stock* 5.1 Opinion of Counsel 10.1 Stock Purchase Agreement by and among Nexgen Acquisitions VIII, Inc., RM Enterprises International, Inc. and RSI Enterprises, Inc.* 10.2 Stock Purchase Agreement by and between Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. and Colebrook, Inc. 10.3 License Agreement dated July 1, 2001 with Dicon Technologies 10.4 Supply and Requirements Agreement dated July 1, 2001 with Dicon Technologies 10.5 Manufacturer's Representative Agreement dated July 1, 2001 with Dicon Technologies 23.1 Accountant's Consent 23.2 Counsel's Consent to Use Opinion* ------------------ * Previously filed as an exhibit to registration statement on Form SB-2 filed November 1, 2002 II-9

Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated by Reference

Referenced-On Page
This ‘SB-2/A’ Filing    Date First  Last      Other Filings
5/31/2248
8/31/0313
Filed on:1/13/0358
12/31/0213
12/26/02549
12/16/02556
11/1/0259SB-2
9/17/0215
8/31/02749
8/15/0234
7/15/02556
7/1/0214
5/31/02749
4/24/0256
2/5/024056
8/31/01747
7/1/011459
6/30/0142
5/31/01749
7/18/99556
 List all Filings 
Top
Filing Submission 0001201251-03-000007   –   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)

Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Fri., Mar. 29, 10:24:09.2am ET