SEC Info  
  Home     Search     My Interests     Help     Sign In     Please Sign In  

Preferred Home Mortgage Co, et al. · S-4 · On 7/16/03

Filed On 7/16/03 4:50pm ET   ·   SEC Files 333-107091, -01, -02, -03, -04, -05, -06, -07, -08, -09, -10, -11, -12, -13, -14, -15, -16, -17, -18, -19, -20, -21, -22, -23, -24, -25, -26, -27, -28, -29, -30, -31, -32   ·   Accession Number 1212405-3-6

  in   Show  and 
  As Of               Filer                 Filing     As/For/On Docs:Pgs              Issuer               Agent

 7/16/03  Preferred Home Mortgage Co        S-4                   16:331                                    Bowne of Atlanta/FA
          Newmark Homes Purchasing LP
          Engle Homes Delaware Inc
          Universal Land Title Investment No 4 LLC
          Universal Land Title of the Palm Beaches Ltd
          Newmark Homes Business Trust
          Pacific United LP
          Newmark Homes LP
          Tousa Associates Services Co
          Tousa Homes Inc
          Tousa Financing Inc
          Tousa Shared Services LLC
          Alliance Insurance & Information Services LLC
          McKay Landing LLC
          Engle James LLC
          DP Nh Investments LP
          DP Nh Management LLC
          Century Title Agency Ltd
          Engle Homes Virginia Inc
          Preferred Builders Realty Inc
          Universal Land Title Inc
          Technical Olympic USA Inc
          Universal Land Title of South Florida Ltd
          Prestige Abstract & Title LLC
          Universal Land Title Investment 1 LLC
          Silverlake Interests L C
          Professional Advantage Title Ltd
          Universal Land Title Investment 3 LLC
          Universal Land Title Investment 2 LLC
          Universal Land Title of Texas Inc
          Tousa Ventures LLC
          Newmark Homes LLC
          Engle Homes Residential Construction LLC

Registration of Securities Issued in a Business-Combination Transaction   ·   Form S-4
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: S-4         Technical Olympic Usa, Inc.                         HTML  2,100K 
 2: EX-5.1      EX-5.1 Opinion of Akerman Senterfitt                   2±    19K 
 3: EX-10.31    EX-10.31 Employment Agreement With Mark Upton         20     98K 
 4: EX-10.32    EX-10.32 First Amendment to Employment Agreement       4     31K 
 5: EX-10.34    Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement                   7     35K 
 6: EX-12       Statement Re: Computation of Earnings                  1     17K 
 7: EX-21       Subsidiaries                                           2±    20K 
 8: EX-23.1     EX-23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young Llp                   1     14K 
 9: EX-23.2     EX-23.2 Consent of Bdo Seidman Llp                     1     15K 
10: EX-23.3     EX-23.3 Consent of Bdo Seidman Llp                     1     14K 
11: EX-25.1     EX-25.1 Statement of Eligibility of Trustee            7     40K 
12: EX-99.1     EX-99.1 Letter of Transmittal                       HTML     79K 
13: EX-99.2     EX-99.2 Notice of Guaranteed Delivery               HTML     24K 
14: EX-99.3     EX-99.3 Letter to Brokers                           HTML     20K 
15: EX-99.4     EX-99.4 Letter to Clients                           HTML     22K 
16: EX-99.5     EX-99.5 Guidelines for Certification                HTML     33K 


S-4   ·   Technical Olympic Usa, Inc.
Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page
"Table of Contents
"Prospectus Summary
"Summary Financial and Operating Data
"Risk Factors
"Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
"Use of Proceeds
"Capitalization
"Selected Historical Financial Information
"Management S Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
"Business
"Board of Directors
"Management
"Executive Compensation
"Security Ownership
"Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
"Description of Material Indebtedness
"The Exchange Offer
"Description of the Notes
"Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
"Plan of Distribution
"Legal Matters
"Experts
"Where You Can Find More Information
"Signatures

This is an EDGAR HTML document rendered as filed.  [ Alternative Formats ]


Sponsored Ads...
  Technical Olympic USA, Inc.  

Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 16, 2003
Registration No. 333-                              


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


Form S-4

REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933


Technical Olympic USA, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
         
Delaware
  1520   76-0460831
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

4000 Hollywood Boulevard

Suite 500 N
Hollywood, Florida 33021
(954) 364-4000
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)


Patricia M. Petersen, Esq.

4000 Hollywood Boulevard
Suite 500 N
Hollywood, Florida 33021
Phone: (954) 364-4000
Fax: (954) 364-4037
(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Agent For Service)

Copy To:

Kara L. MacCullough, Esq.
Akerman Senterfitt
One S.E. Third Avenue, 28th Floor
Miami, Florida 33131
Phone: (305) 374-5600
Fax: (305) 374-5095


     Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale of the securities to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this registration statement.

     If the securities being registered on this form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box:    o

     If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o

     If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o


Calculation of Registration Fee

                 
Proposed Maximum Proposed Maximum
Title of Each Class of Amount to be Offering Price Per Aggregate Offering Amount of
Securities to be Registered Registered Note(1) Price(1) Registration Fee
10% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2012
  $35,000,000   100%   $35,000,000   $2,831.50
Guarantees of 10 3/8% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2012(2)
  (3)       (3)

(1)  Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(f) under the Securities Act of 1933 as the market value of the securities to be cancelled in the exchange.
(2)  See the following pages for a list of the guarantors, which are direct and indirect subsidiaries of Technical Olympic USA, Inc.
(3)  Not applicable, as provided in Rule 457(n) under the Securities Act of 1933.


     The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.





Table of Contents

                         
State or other
Jurisdiction of Primary Standard
Incorporation Industrial Classification IRS Employer
Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter or Organization Code Number Identification Number




Alliance Insurance and Information Services, LLC
    Florida       1520       59-3596268  
DP-NH Investments, LP
    Texas       1520       43-2012134  
DP-NH Management, LLC
    Texas       1520       43-2011985  
Engle Homes Delaware, Inc. 
    Delaware       1520       51-0394120  
Engle Homes Residential Construction, LLC
    Arizona       1520       32-0067156  
Engle Homes/ Virginia, Inc. 
    Florida       1520       65-0482565  
Engle/ James, LLC
    Colorado       1520       84-1442544  
McKay Landing, L.L.C. 
    Colorado       1520       84-1488307  
Newmark Homes Business Trust
    Delaware       1520       76-6166146  
Newmark Homes, LLC
    Delaware       1520       51-0461118  
Newmark Homes, L.P. 
    Texas       1520       76-0515833  
Newmark Homes Purchasing, L.P. 
    Texas       1520       76-0660771  
Pacific United, L.P. 
    Texas       1520       75-2677699  
Preferred Builders Realty, Inc. 
    Florida       1520       59-2552841  
Preferred Home Mortgage Company
    Florida       6162       65-0325930  
Prestige Abstract & Title, LLC
    Florida       1520       65-0883517  
Professional Advantage Title, Ltd. 
    Florida       1520       65-0883517  
Silverlake Interests, L.C. 
    Texas       1520       74-2900725  
The Century Title Agency, Ltd. 
    Florida       1520       65-0795019  
TOUSA Associates Services Company
    Delaware       1520       37-1448116  
TOUSA Financing, Inc. 
    Delaware       1520       75-3097711  
TOUSA Homes, Inc. (f/k/a Engle
Homes, Inc.)
    Florida       1531       59-2214791  
TOUSA Shared Services, LLC
    Florida       1520       54-2107260  
TOUSA Ventures, LLC
    Florida       1520       14-1876949  
Universal Land Title, Inc. 
    Florida       1520       65-2630287  
Universal Land Title Investment #1, LLC
    Florida       1520       01-0587412  
Universal Land Title Investment #2, LLC
    Florida       1520       01-0587430  
Universal Land Title Investment #3, LLC
    Florida       1520       01-0587451  
Universal Land Title Investment #4, LLC
    Florida       1520       01-0587464  
Universal Land Title of South Florida, Ltd. 
    Florida       1520       65-1079806  
Universal Land Title of Texas, Inc. 
    Texas       1520       65-0866344  
Universal Land Title of The Palm Beaches, Ltd. 
    Florida       1520       65-0796917  


Table of Contents

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not exchange these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to exchange these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to exchange these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

Subject to Completion, Dated July 16, 2003

PROSPECTUS

Image -- (TOUSA LOGO)

Technical Olympic USA, Inc.

Exchange Offer for $35,000,000 10 3/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012 that are

guaranteed on a senior subordinated unsecured basis by our material
domestic subsidiaries


Exchange Offer

    We will exchange new notes that are registered under the Securities Act for old notes that were sold on April 22, 2003. All old notes that are validly tendered and not validly withdrawn will be exchanged. We will receive no proceeds from the exchange offer.


Exchange Offer Expiration

    The exchange offer will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City time on [21 business days after commencement of offer], or a later date and time to which it may be extended.


Old Notes

    On April 22, 2003, we issued and sold $35,000,000 of 10 3/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012. If you tender your old notes in the exchange offer, interest will cease to accrue when your new notes are issued. If you do not tender your old notes in the exchange offer, your old notes will continue to be subject to the same terms and restrictions except that we will not be required to register your old notes under the Securities Act.


New Notes

    The new notes are identical to the old notes except that the new notes will be registered under the Securities Act. The new notes are expected to trade in the Private Offerings, Resales and Trading through Automatic Linkages Market referred to as the PORTAL Market.

•  Maturity: July 1, 2012.
 
•  Change of Control: You can require us to purchase all or part of your notes at 101% of the aggregate principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of repurchase.
 
•  Interest: Paid semi-annually on January 1 and July 1 of each year, beginning on July 1, 2003.
 
•  Guarantors: Our material domestic subsidiaries.
 
•  Redemption by us: We may redeem all or part of the notes on or after July 1, 2007. Prior to July 1, 2005, we may redeem up to 35% of the notes from the proceeds of certain sales of our equity securities. Redemption prices are specified in this prospectus under “Description of the Notes — Optional Redemption.”
 
•  Ranking: The new notes will be senior subordinated unsecured obligations of Technical Olympic USA, Inc. The notes will rank equal in right of payment with our currently outstanding 10?% senior subordinated notes and future unsecured senior subordinated debt, will rank senior in right of payment to all of our existing and future subordinated debt, and will be junior in right of payment to all of our existing and future senior debt, including our 9% senior notes and our revolving credit facility.


      Investment in the notes to be issued in the exchange offer involves risks. See the risk factors section beginning on page 14.


    This prospectus and the accompanying letter of transmittal are first being mailed to holders of outstanding notes on or about                    , 2003.

    Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the notes or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The date of this prospectus is                     , 2003.



Table of Contents

      Each broker-dealer that receives new notes for its own account pursuant to the exchange offer must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of the new notes. The letter of transmittal states that by so acknowledging and by delivering a prospectus, a broker will not be deemed to admit that it is an “underwriter” within the meaning of the Securities Act. This prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, may be used by a broker-dealer in connection with the resales of new notes received in exchange for old notes where such old notes were acquired by such broker-dealer as a result of market making activities or other trading activities. We have agreed that for a period ending upon the earlier of (1) 180 days after the exchange offer has been completed or (2) the date on which broker-dealers no longer own any new notes, we will make this prospectus available to any broker-dealer for use in connection with any such resale. See “Plan of Distribution.”



 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
SUMMARY FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
RISK FACTORS
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
USE OF PROCEEDS
CAPITALIZATION
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
BUSINESS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
MANAGEMENT
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SECURITY OWNERSHIP
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL INDEBTEDNESS
THE EXCHANGE OFFER
DESCRIPTION OF THE NOTES
CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
LEGAL MATTERS
EXPERTS
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
SIGNATURES
SIGNATURES
SIGNATURES
SIGNATURES
EX-5.1 Opinion of Akerman Senterfitt
EX-10.31 Employment Agreement with Mark Upton
Ex-10.32 First Amendment to Employment Agreement
Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement
Statement Re: Computation of Earnings
Subsidiaries
Ex-23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
Ex-23.2 Consent of BDO Seidman LLP
EX-23.3 Consent of BDO Seidman LLP
EX-25.1 Statement of Eligibility of Trustee
EX-99.1 Letter of Transmittal
EX-99.2 Notice of Guaranteed Delivery
EX-99.3 Letter to Brokers
EX-99.4 Letter to Clients
EX-99.5 Guidelines for Certification


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

         
Prospectus Summary
    1  
Summary Financial and Operating Data
    12  
Risk Factors
    14  
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
    23  
Use of Proceeds
    25  
Capitalization
    26  
Selected Historical Financial Information
    27  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
    30  
Business
    47  
Board of Directors
    59  
Management
    62  
Executive Compensation
    63  
Security Ownership
    67  
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
    69  
Description of Material Indebtedness
    71  
The Exchange Offer
    74  
Description of the Notes
    83  
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
    130  
Plan of Distribution
    134  
Legal Matters
    134  
Experts
    134  
Where You Can Find More Information
    135  


Table of Contents

 

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

      This prospectus summary highlights selected information about us. In addition to reading this summary, you should carefully review the entire prospectus, especially the “Risk Factors” section of this document beginning on page 14. In addition certain statements include forward-looking information which involves risks and uncertainties.

      Unless this prospectus otherwise indicates or the context otherwise requires, the terms “we,” “our,” or “us,” as used in this prospectus refer to Technical Olympic USA, Inc. and its subsidiaries and the term Technical Olympic refers to Technical Olympic, Inc. our majority stockholder.

Overview

      We design, build and market high quality detached single-family residences, town homes and condominiums. We operate in markets characterized by strong population and income growth. Currently, we conduct homebuilding operations in 14 metropolitan markets, located in four major geographic regions: Florida, the Mid-Atlantic, Texas and the West.

      For the twelve months ended December 31, 2002, we delivered 5,085 homes, with an average sales price of $265,000, and generated approximately $1.3 billion in revenues from home sales and $67.0 million in income from continuing operations. For the three months ended March 31, 2003, we delivered 1,234 homes, with an average sales price of $254,000, and generated approximately $313.8 million in revenues from home sales and $17.7 million in income from continuing operations. Our backlog of homes at March 31, 2003 was 2,826 homes under contract, representing $764.0 million in expected revenues.

      We market our homes to a diverse group of homebuyers, including “first-time” homebuyers, “move-up” homebuyers, homebuyers who are relocating to a new city or state, buyers of second or vacation homes, active-adult homebuyers and homebuyers with grown children who want a smaller home (“empty-nesters”). Our homes are marketed under various brand names, including Engle Homes, Newmark Homes, Fedrick, Harris Estate Homes, Marksman Homes, D.S. Ware Homes, Masonry Homes, Trophy Homes and James Company. As of March 31, 2003, we either owned or had options to acquire 31,651 homesites, and we were actively marketing in 176 communities.

      As part of our objective to provide homebuyers a seamless home purchasing experience, we have developed, and are expanding, our complementary financial services business. As part of this business, we provide mortgage financing and closing services and offer title, homeowners’ and other insurance products. Our mortgage financing operation derives most of its revenues from origination and brokerage fees, as we sell substantially all of our mortgages to third parties. Our mortgage financing services are used primarily by buyers of our homes, although we also offer these services to existing homeowners refinancing their mortgages. By comparison, our closing services and our insurance agency operations are used by our homebuyers as well as a broad range of other clients purchasing or refinancing residential or commercial real estate.

Competitive Strengths

      High Growth Markets. We believe that by focusing our homebuilding operations in high growth markets, we are well positioned to expand our business and maximize our financial returns. We operate in five of the eight fastest growing states in the United States, based on population growth from 1990 to 2000. The average median population growth in the eight states where we operate was 28.1% from 1990 to 2000, as compared to the U.S. average of 13.1%. In addition, each of the states in which we operate has demonstrated a history of solid economic growth. These eight states had an average median income growth of 13.3%, as compared to the U.S. average of 4.0%, from 1989 to 1999. We expect that these growth trends will increase future housing demand in our markets. Additionally, based on our relative position in each of these markets, we believe we have the opportunity to expand our operations.

1



Table of Contents

      Geographic and Customer Diversification. We operate in 14 geographically diverse markets. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2002, none of our metropolitan markets represented more than 18% of our total revenues. Within our markets, we target a diverse customer base including first-time, move-up, relocating, active-adult and empty-nester homebuyer segments. In 2002, we generated 42% of our revenues from home sales from homes in the $200,000 to $300,000 price range, 26% of our revenues from home sales from homes in the $300,000 to $400,000 price range, 16% of our revenues from home sales from homes in the under $200,000 price range, and 16% of our revenues from home sales from homes in the over $400,000 price range. We believe that this diversification protects us from downturns in any one market or price segment and provides us with additional growth opportunities.

      Experienced Management Team. We balance our local expertise and focus with a seasoned and professional senior management team. Our regional and divisional managers have an average of more than 20 years of homebuilding experience in their local markets. As a result, they have developed in-depth market expertise and familiarity with their customers and subcontractors. In addition, as a result of their long-standing relationships with local land sellers and developers, our regional and divisional managers are well-positioned to acquire premium land and homesites. Our senior corporate managers have an average of more than 18 years of experience in the homebuilding business and have a successful track record of delivering strong results in varying homebuilding cycles. The experience and depth of our management team provides us the capability to quickly evaluate and successfully capitalize on market opportunities and adjust to changing national, regional and local business conditions.

      Strong Land Positions and Disciplined Acquisition Strategy. Land is our key raw material and one of our most valuable assets. We believe that by acquiring land and homesites in premier locations, we enhance our competitive standing and reduce our exposure to economic downturns. We believe that homes in premier locations continue to attract homebuyers in both strong and weak economic conditions. We consider that our disciplined acquisition strategy of balancing homesites and land we own and those we can acquire under option contracts provides us access to a substantial supply of quality homesites and land while conserving our invested capital and optimizing our returns. Generally, we acquire only homesites and entitled land suitable for homesite development and residential construction.

      Strong Brand Recognition and Customer Service. We market our homes under various brand names, including Engle Homes, Newmark Homes, Fedrick, Harris Estate Homes, Marksman Homes, D.S. Ware Homes, Masonry Homes, Trophy Homes and James Company. We believe our brands are widely recognized in the markets in which we operate for providing quality homes in desirable locations and enjoy a solid reputation among potential homebuyers. We believe that customer satisfaction enhances our reputation for quality and service and leads to significant repeat and referral business. In our industry, customer satisfaction is based in large part on our ability to respond promptly and courteously to homebuyers before, during and after the sale of our homes. As part of our customer service program, we conduct pre-delivery inspections to promptly address any outstanding construction issues and contract independent third parties to conduct periodic post-delivery evaluations of the customer’s satisfaction with their home, as well as the customer’s experience with our sales personnel, construction department and title and mortgage services.

Business Strategies

      Capitalize on Growth Potential in Our Current Markets. We believe that a significant portion of our future growth will stem from our ability to increase our homes sales and capture additional market share within our current markets. Currently, we conduct homebuilding operations in 14 metropolitan markets, each of which is highly fragmented with numerous smaller homebuilders. Our reputation as a high quality homebuilder combined with our financial resources gives us an advantage over many smaller homebuilders with whom we compete. Based on management estimates, we are positioned as a top-five homebuilder in three of our current markets. Consequently, we have an opportunity to significantly strengthen our market position by expanding our product offerings and increasing the number of our active selling communities. Our current markets have demonstrated solid income and population growth trends. As a result, we expect that strong demand for new housing in our current markets will also contribute to our growth. By

2



Table of Contents

leveraging our current operations, we believe that we will, over time, maximize our financial returns, strengthen our margins and increase our revenues and profitability.

      Implement Performance Improvement and Best Practices Initiatives. As part of our goal of strengthening our financial returns, we continuously monitor and evaluate our systems, practices and procedures in order to improve our operations. We recently adopted a detailed “Performance Improvement Plan” that focuses on techniques to enhance operating efficiencies. We have, and will continue to, implement best practices across our operating divisions and believe that this operating strategy has allowed, and will continue to allow, us to:

  •  implement innovative information systems to, among other things, monitor homebuilding production, scheduling and budgeting and facilitate communication among our divisions with respect to the design and construction of our homes;
 
  •  reduce the time necessary to complete each stage in the homebuilding process;
 
  •  effectively manage our inventory of homes;
 
  •  use our purchasing power to achieve volume discounts and the best possible service from our vendors; and
 
  •  achieve more favorable pricing of homesite premiums and options.

      Grow Our Financial Services Business. Our financial services operations require minimal capital investment and are highly profitable because of the high margins we obtain from our mortgage financing operation and the high volume of transactions generated from our title insurance and closing services operations. We believe that these financial services complement our homebuilding operations and provide homebuyers a seamless home purchasing experience. For the three months ended March 31, 2003, approximately 53% of our homebuyers utilized the services of our mortgage business, while 80% of our homebuyers used our title and closing services and 25% used our insurance agencies to obtain insurance. We believe that we have an opportunity to grow our financial services business by:

  •  increasing the percentage of our homebuyers who use our financial services;
 
  •  marketing our financial services more actively to buyers of homes built by other homebuilders, including smaller homebuilders that do not provide their own financial services; and
 
  •  offering additional services that complement our existing financial services in all our markets.

      Selectively Expand Into New Markets. We intend to supplement our primary growth strategy of expansion in our current markets with a disciplined, financial return oriented approach to entering new markets. We will focus on entering metropolitan areas that have favorable homebuilding characteristics, including availability of strong management with local market expertise as well as solid income and population growth trends, significant single-family home permit activity, a diversified economy and an adequate supply of obtainable homesites. We believe this long-term emphasis on geographic diversification across a range of growing markets with strong fundamentals will enable us to minimize our exposure to adverse economic conditions, seasonality and housing cycles in individual local markets. We will enter new markets through strategic acquisitions of other homebuilders and, to the extent we enter new markets that complement and/or are in close proximity to our current markets, we will utilize our existing management expertise and resources to establish operations.

Recent Developments

      On June 26, 2003, we filed a registration statement relating to the proposed sale by Technical Olympic, our principal stockholder, of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock held by them. The underwriters named in the registration statement have an option to purchase up to an additional 300,000 shares of our common stock from Technical Olympic. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of common stock by Technical Olympic. Technical Olympic currently owns 90.73% of our common stock and will own approximately 83.56% after consummation of the proposed offering, or 82.48% if the

3



Table of Contents

underwriters exercise the over-allotment option in full. The registration statement has not yet been declared effective by the Commission.

Principal Executive Offices

      Our executive offices are located at 4000 Hollywood Blvd., Suite 500 North, Hollywood, Florida 33021. Our telephone number is (954) 364-4000. Our Web address is www.tousa.com. We do not intend the information on our Website to constitute part of this prospectus.

4



Table of Contents

The Exchange Offer

 
Securities Offered $35.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 10 3/8% senior subordinated notes due 2012 that are guaranteed on a senior subordinated unsecured basis by our material domestic subsidiaries. The terms of the new notes and the old notes are identical except for the transfer restrictions and registration rights. The new notes and the old notes are collectively referred to as the “notes.”
 
Issuer Technical Olympic USA, Inc.
 
Issue Date April 22, 2003.
 
Maturity Date July 1, 2012.
 
Issuance of Old Notes The old notes were, and the new notes will be, issued as additional notes under the indenture, dated as of June 25, 2002 among us, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association. On June 25, 2002 we had previously issued $150.0 million of 10 3/8% senior subordinated unsecured notes due 2012 under the same indenture, which we refer to as the “June 2002 Senior Subordinated Notes.” The old notes have, and the new notes will have substantially the same terms as the June 2002 Senior Subordinated Notes.
 
The Exchange Offer We are offering to exchange $1,000 principal amount of new notes for each $1,000 principal amount of old notes. Old notes may only be exchanged in $1,000 principal amount increments. There is $35.0 million in aggregate principal amount of old notes outstanding.
 
Conditions to the Exchange Offer The exchange offer is not conditioned upon any minimum principal amount of old notes being tendered for exchange. However, the exchange offer is subject to customary conditions, which may be waived by us.
 
Procedures For Tendering If you wish to tender your old notes in the exchange offer, you must complete and sign the letter of transmittal for the notes according to the instructions contained in this prospectus. You must then mail, fax, or hand deliver the letter of transmittal, together with any other required documents, to the exchange agent, either with the old notes to be tendered or in compliance with the specified procedures for guaranteed delivery of old notes. You should allow sufficient time to ensure timely delivery. Some brokers, dealers, commercial banks, trust companies and other nominees may also effect tenders by book-entry transfer. If you own old notes registered in the name of a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company, or other nominee, you are urged to contact that person promptly if you wish to tender old notes in the exchange offer. Letters of transmittal and certificates representing the old notes should not be sent to us. These documents should be sent only to the exchange agent. Questions regarding how to tender and requests for information should also be directed to the exchange agent. If you hold old notes through The Depository Trust Company and wish to accept the exchange

5



Table of Contents

offer, you must do so pursuant to the book-entry transfer facility’s procedures for book entry transfer (or other applicable procedures), contained in this prospectus and the letter of transmittal.
 
Expiration Date; Withdrawal The exchange offer will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City time on [21 business days after commencement of offer] or a later date and time to which it may be extended. However, it may not be extended beyond                     , 2003. We will accept for exchange any and all old notes that are validly tendered in the exchange offer prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date. The tender of old notes may be withdrawn at any time prior to the expiration date. Any old note not accepted for exchange for any reason will be returned without expense to the tendering holder as promptly as practicable after the expiration or termination of the exchange offer. The new notes issued in the exchange offer will be delivered promptly following the expiration date.
 
Guaranteed Delivery Procedures If you wish to tender your old notes and (1) your old notes are not immediately available or (2) you cannot deliver your old notes together with the letter of transmittal to the exchange agent prior to the expiration date, you may tender your old notes according to the guaranteed delivery procedures contained in the letter of transmittal.
 
Tax Considerations For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the exchange of old notes for new notes should not be considered a sale or exchange or otherwise a taxable event to the holders of notes.
 
Use of Proceeds We will not receive any proceeds from the exchange offer.
 
Appraisal Rights Holders of old notes will not have dissenters’ rights or appraisal rights in connection with the exchange offer.
 
Exchange Agent Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association is serving as exchange agent in connection with the exchange offer for the notes.
 
Resales of new notes Based on an interpretation by the Commission set forth in no-action letters issued to third parties, we believe that you may resell or otherwise transfer new notes issued in the exchange offer in exchange for old notes without restrictions under the federal securities laws. However, there are exceptions to this general statement.
 
You may not freely transfer the new notes if:
 
• you are an affiliate of ours;
 
• you did not acquire the new notes in the ordinary course of your business;
 
• you intend to participate in the exchange offer for the purpose of distributing new notes; or
 
• you are a broker-dealer who acquired the old notes directly from us.

6



Table of Contents

 
Any holder subject to any of the exceptions above will not be able to rely on the interpretations of the Commission staff set forth in the above-mentioned interpretive letters; will not be permitted or entitled to tender old notes in the exchange offer; and must comply with the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any sale or other transfer of old notes unless the sale is made pursuant to an exemption from those requirements.
 
In addition, each participating broker-dealer that receives new notes for its own account in the exchange offer in exchange for old notes that were acquired as a result of market making activities or other trading activities and not directly from us, must comply with the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act in connection with the resale of the new notes.
 
Consequences of Not Exchanging the Old Notes If you do not tender your old notes or your old notes are not properly tendered, the existing transfer restrictions will continue to apply. The old notes are currently eligible for sale pursuant to Rule 144A through the PORTAL Market. Because we anticipate that most holders will elect to exchange old notes for new notes due to the absence of restrictions on the resale of new notes under the Securities Act, we anticipate that the liquidity of the market for any old notes remaining after the consummation of the exchange offer will be substantially limited.

Summary Description of the New Notes

      The terms of the new notes and the old notes are identical in all respects, except that the terms of the new notes do not include the transfer restrictions and registration rights relating to the old notes.

 
Notes Offered $35.0 million aggregate principal amount of 10 3/8% senior subordinated notes due 2012.
 
Maturity Date July 1, 2012.
 
Interest Payment Dates January 1 and July 1 of each year, commencing July 1, 2003.
 
Interest The new notes will bear interest from the later of January 1, 2003 or the most recent date to which interest has been paid on the old notes. Accordingly, registered holders of new notes on the relevant record date for the first interest payment date following the completion of the exchange offer will receive interest accruing from the later of January 1, 2003 or the most recent date on which interest has been paid. Old notes accepted for exchange will cease to accrue interest from and after the date of completion of the exchange offer. Holders of old notes whose old notes are accepted for exchange will not receive any payment in respect of interest on the old notes otherwise payable on any interest payment date that occurs on or after completion of the exchange offer.

7



Table of Contents

 
Ranking The notes are:
 
• our senior subordinated, unsecured obligations;
 
• junior in right of payment to all of our existing and future senior debt, including our 9% senior notes and outstandings under our revolving credit facility;
 
• equal in right of payment (“pari passu”) with all our existing and future senior subordinated debt (including our existing senior subordinated notes issued in June 2002);
 
• senior in right of payment to all our existing and future subordinated debt; and
 
• guaranteed on a senior subordinated, unsecured basis by the guarantors.
 
As of March 31, 2003, as adjusted for the offering of the old notes and the application of the net proceeds, the new notes would have been:
 
• junior in right of payment to $355.4 million of senior debt; and
 
• equal in right of payment to $150.0 million of the June 2002 Senior Subordinated Notes.
 
As of March 31, 2003, as adjusted for the offering of the old notes and the application of the net proceeds, and the recent amendment to our revolving credit facility, we could have incurred an additional $251.5 million of senior debt, which would be senior in right of payment to the notes.
 
Guarantees The notes are fully guaranteed on a senior subordinated, unsecured basis, jointly and severally, by all of our material domestic subsidiaries.
 
The guarantees will be:
 
• junior in right of payment to all of the future and existing senior debt of the guarantors;
 
• equal in right of payment with all of the future and existing senior subordinated debt of the guarantors; and
 
• senior in right of payment to all of the existing and future subordinated debt of the guarantors.
 
As of March 31, 2003, our consolidated subsidiaries that were not guarantors of the old notes had assets of $14.0 million.
 
As of March 31, 2003, as adjusted for the offering of the old notes and the application of the net proceeds:
 
• the guarantees issued by each of the guarantors are equal in right of payment to $150.0 million of the June 2002 Senior Subordinated Notes;
 
• the guarantees issued by each of the guarantors, other than Preferred Home Mortgage Company and Pacific United L.P., are junior in right of payment to $316.0 million of senior debt;

8



Table of Contents

 
• the guarantee issued by Preferred Home Mortgage Company is junior in right of payment to $350.6 million of senior debt; and
 
• the guarantee issued by Pacific United L.P. is junior in right of payment to $320.8 million of senior debt.
 
As of March 31, 2003, as adjusted for the offering of the old notes and the application of the net proceeds, and the amendment of our revolving credit facility, the guarantors could have incurred an additional $221.1 million of debt under our revolving credit facility to which the guarantees on the notes would be junior in right of payment and Preferred Home Mortgage Company could have incurred an additional $30.4 million of senior debt under our warehouse line of credit, to which the guarantees of Preferred Home Mortgage Company would be junior in right of payment.
 
Optional Redemption Prior to July 1, 2007, we may redeem all or part of the notes by paying a “make-whole” premium based on U.S. Treasury rates as specified in this prospectus under “Description of the Notes — Optional Redemption.”
 
We may redeem all or a part of the notes at any time on or after July 1, 2007, at the redemption prices listed in “Description of the Notes — Optional Redemption” plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.
 
At any time prior to July 1, 2005, we may use the proceeds of certain equity offerings and/or equity investments to redeem up to 35% of the original principal amount of the notes (plus all other notes issued under the indenture for the notes) at a redemption price of 110.375% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date; provided that at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes (plus all other notes issued under the indenture for the notes) remain outstanding after such redemption and that such redemption shall occur within 75 days of the date of the closing of such equity offering and/or equity investment.
 
Mandatory Offer to Purchase If we experience a change of control, we must offer to repurchase all or a part of the notes (plus all other notes issued under the indenture for the notes) at a purchase price of 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of repurchase.
 
Covenants The notes are issued under the indenture, dated June 25, 2002 among us, the guarantors and the trustee. The indenture contains covenants that limit our ability to, among other things:
 
• incur additional indebtedness;
 
• pay dividends or make other restricted payments;
 
• create or permit certain liens;
 
• sell assets;

9



Table of Contents

 
• create or permit restrictions on the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends or other distributions to us;
 
• engage in transactions with affiliates; and
 
• consolidate or merge with or into other companies or sell all or substantially all of our assets.
 
The indenture also includes a covenant that requires us to maintain a certain consolidated net worth.
 
The covenants in the indenture are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications.
 
If after the date of this offering, the notes receive an Investment Grade rating (as defined under “Description of the Notes — Certain Definitions”), then for so long as such rating is maintained and no default or event of default shall have occurred and be continuing, certain of the covenants will cease to apply as described under “Description of the Notes — Certain Covenants — Covenant Suspension.”
 
Events of Default Each of the following constitutes an event of default:
 
• default for 30 days in the payment when due of interest on the notes;
 
• default in payment when due of the principal of or premium, if any, on the notes;
 
• failure by us or any of our subsidiaries to comply with the provisions described under the captions “Description of the Notes — Certain Covenants,” “Description of the Notes — Merger, Consolidation or Sale of Property;”
 
• failure by us or any of our subsidiaries for 30 days after notice to comply with any of our other covenants or agreements in the indenture or the notes;
 
• default under any debt (other than non-recourse debt) by us or any restricted subsidiary that results in the acceleration of the maturity of such debt, or failure to pay any such debt at maturity, in an aggregate amount greater than $10.0 million;
 
• failure by us or any of our restricted subsidiaries to pay final judgments aggregating in excess of $10.0 million, which judgments are not waived, satisfied or discharged for any period of 30 consecutive days during which a stay of enforcement shall not be in effect;
 
• certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency with respect to us or any of our restricted subsidiaries that is a significant subsidiaries; or
 
• if any guarantee ceases to be in full force and effect, or any guarantor denies or disaffirms its obligations under any guarantee.
 
Rights of Holders If any event of default occurs and is continuing, the trustee or the holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the notes

10



Table of Contents

outstanding, including the June 2002 Senior Subordinated Notes, may declare all of the notes to be due and payable immediately. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of an event of default arising from the bankruptcy provisions, all outstanding notes will become due and payable without further action or notice. Holders of the notes may not enforce the indenture or the notes except as provided in the indenture. Subject to certain limitations, holders of a majority in principal amount of the then outstanding notes may direct the trustee in its exercise of any trust or power.
 
The holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the notes then outstanding by notice to the trustee may on behalf of the holders of all of the notes waive any existing default or event of default and its consequences under the indenture except a continuing default or event of default in the payment of interest on, or the principal of, the notes.
 
No Prior Market The new notes will be new securities for which there is currently no market. Although the initial purchaser has informed us of its intention to make a market in the new notes, it is not obligated to do so and it may discontinue any market-making at any time without notice. Accordingly we cannot assure you as to the development or liquidity of any market for the new notes.
 
Trustee Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association

      For additional information concerning the notes, see “Description of the Notes.”

11



Table of Contents

 

SUMMARY FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA

      The following table sets forth our summary financial and operating data. The summary financial data in the table for the three years ended December 31, 2002 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The summary financial data in the table for the three month periods ended March 31, 2002 and 2003 have been derived from unaudited financial statements. The unaudited financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, which we consider necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations for these periods. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year ending December 31, 2003. The data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, related notes and other financial information included herein.

                                             
Year Ended December 31, Three Months Ended March 31,


2000(1)(2) 2001(1)(2) 2002(1)(2) 2002(1)(2) 2003





(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Statement of Income Data:
                                       
Homebuilding:
                                       
 
Revenues from home sales
  $ 540,323     $ 1,374,551     $ 1,349,713     $ 302,155     $ 313,820  
 
Revenues from land sales
    6,343       18,361       27,379       383       2,060  
     
     
     
     
     
 
   
Total revenues
    546,666       1,392,912       1,377,092       302,538       315,880  
 
Cost of sales from home sales
    434,736       1,091,626       1,075,875       239,645       246,280  
 
Cost of sales from land sales
    6,203       16,660       24,430       430       1,841  
     
     
     
     
     
 
   
Total cost of sales
    440,939       1,108,286       1,100,305       240,075       248,121  
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Gross profit
    105,727       284,626       276,787       62,463       67,759  
 
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
    63,832       152,063       163,726       37,704       43,790  
 
Depreciation and amortization
    3,112       8,849       5,952       1,631       1,646  
 
Severance and merger related expenses
          2,643       19,963       13,828        
 
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
                5,411              
 
Other (income) expense
    2,264       (3,941 )     (5,838 )     (222 )     (1,019 )
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Homebuilding pretax income
    36,519       125,012       87,573       9,522       23,342  
Financial Services:
                                       
 
Revenues
    2,562       32,659       40,214       7,954       10,645  
 
Expenses
    1,635       17,688       20,846       3,780       6,160  
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Financial Services pretax income
    927       14,971       19,368       4,174       4,485  
 
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    37,446       139,983       106,941       13,696       27,827  
 
Income tax expense
    13,672       52,218       39,900       4,767       10,171  
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Income from continuing operations
  $ 23,774     $ 87,765     $ 67,041     $ 8,929     $ 17,656  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Per Share Data:
                                       
Income from continuing operations (basic and diluted)
  $ 1.79     $ 3.15     $ 2.40     $ 0.32     $ 0.63  
Income from discontinued operations (basic and diluted)
  $ 0.48     $ 0.22     $ 0.18     $ 0.02     $  
Book value based on shares outstanding at end of period
  $ 12.74     $ 4.83     $ 14.53     $     $ 15.17  
Cash dividends(3)
  $     $ 0.22     $     $     $  
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (basic and diluted)
    13,250,062       27,878,787       27,878,787       27,878,787       27,882,090  
Other Financial Data:
                                       
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(4)
    3.2 x     6.8 x     4.6 x     4.6 x     3.1 x

12



Table of Contents

         
At March 31, 2003

(Dollars in
thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:
       
Inventory
  $ 853,841  
Total assets
  $ 1,148,923  
Homebuilding borrowings
  $ 505,642  
Total borrowings(5)
  $ 540,246  
Stockholders’ equity
  $ 422,961  


(1)  On June 25, 2002, we completed the merger with Engle Holdings, Inc. As both entities were under the common control of Technical Olympic, the merger was accounted for as a reorganization of entities under common control. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141, “Business Combinations,” we recognized the acquired assets and liabilities of Engle Holdings at their historical carrying amounts. As both entities came under common control of Technical Olympic on November 22, 2000, our financial statements and other operating data have been restated to include the operations of Engle Holdings from November 22, 2000. See note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
 
(2)  On April 15, 2002, we completed the sale of Westbrooke Acquisition Corp., formerly one of our Florida homebuilding subsidiaries. In accordance with SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the results of Westbrooke’s operations have been classified as discontinued operations, and prior periods have been restated. See note 8 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
 
(3)  Cash dividends per share have been restated to reflect the total shares outstanding as a result of the merger with Engle Holdings.
 
(4)  For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings represents the sum of income from continuing operating before income taxes and before adjustments for minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries and income or loss from equity investments, distributed income from equity investments, interest amortized in cost of sale, amortization of deferred finance costs, interest expense and the portion of rent expense deemed to represent interest. Fixed charges include interest incurred, whether expensed or capitalized, including amortization of deferred finance costs and the portion of rent expense deemed to represent interest.
 
(5)  Total borrowings includes Homebuilding borrowings and Financial Services borrowings.

13



Table of Contents

 

RISK FACTORS

      Holders of old notes should carefully consider the following factors and all other information set forth in this prospectus before tendering their old notes in the exchange offer.

Risks Related to Our Business

 
Our significant level of debt could adversely affect our financial condition and prevent us from fulfilling our debt service obligations.

      We currently have a significant amount of debt, and our ability to meet our debt service obligations will depend on our future performance. Numerous factors outside of our control, including changes in economic or other business conditions generally or in the markets or industry in which we do business, may adversely affect our operating results and cash flows, which in turn may affect our ability to meet our debt service obligations. As of March 31, 2003, on a consolidated basis, we had approximately $540.2 million aggregate principal amount of debt outstanding (including our revolving credit facility, our senior notes, our June 2002 Senior Subordinated Notes, our warehouse line of credit and our other credit facilities, but excluding consolidated land bank obligations of $12.9 million) and would have had approximately $546.2 million, as adjusted for the offering of the old notes and application of the net proceeds. At March 31, 2003, as adjusted for the offering of the old notes and the application of the net proceeds, and the amendment of our revolving credit facility, we would have had the ability to borrow an additional $221.1 million under our revolving credit facility and $30.4 million under our warehouse line of credit, subject to our satisfying the relevant borrowing conditions in those facilities. In addition, subject to restrictions in our financing documents, we may incur additional debt.

      If we are unable to meet our debt service obligations, we may need to restructure or refinance our debt, seek additional equity financing or sell assets. We may be unable to restructure or refinance our debt, obtain additional equity financing or sell assets on satisfactory terms or at all.

 
Our debt instruments impose significant operating and financial restrictions which may limit our ability to finance future operations or capital needs and pursue business opportunities, thereby limiting our growth.

      The indentures governing our outstanding notes and our revolving credit facility impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions limit our ability to, among other things:

  •  incur additional debt;
 
  •  pay dividends or make other restricted payments;
 
  •  create or permit certain liens, other than customary and ordinary liens;
 
  •  sell assets other than in the ordinary course of our business;
 
  •  create or permit restrictions on the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us;
 
  •  engage in transactions with affiliates; and
 
  •  consolidate or merge with or into other companies or sell all or substantially all of our assets.

      These restrictions could limit our ability to finance our future operations or capital needs, make acquisitions or pursue available business opportunities. In addition, our revolving credit facility requires us to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy certain financial covenants, the indentures governing our outstanding notes require us to maintain a specified minimum consolidated net worth, and our warehouse line of credit requires us to maintain the collateral value of our borrowing base. We may be required to take action to reduce our debt or to act in a manner contrary to our business objectives to meet these ratios and satisfy these covenants. A breach of any of the covenants in, or our inability to maintain the required financial ratios under, our revolving credit facility and warehouse line of credit would prevent us

14



Table of Contents

from borrowing additional money under those facilities and could result in a default under those facilities and our other debt obligations. Our failure to maintain the specified minimum consolidated net worth under the indentures will require us to offer to purchase a portion of our outstanding notes. If we fail to purchase these notes, it would result in a default under the indentures and may result in a default under other debt facilities.
 
Economic downturns in the geographic areas in which we operate could adversely affect demand and prices for new homes in those areas and could have an adverse effect on our revenues and earnings.

      Although we operate in 14 major metropolitan markets, our operations are concentrated in the southwestern and southeastern United States. Adverse economic or other business conditions in these regions or in the particular markets in which we operate, all of which are outside of our control, could have an adverse effect on our revenues and earnings.

 
We may not be able to acquire suitable land at reasonable prices, which could increase our costs and reduce our earnings and profit margins.

      We have experienced an increase in competition for available land and developed homesites in some of our markets as a result of the strength of the economy in many of these markets over the past few years and the availability of more capital to major homebuilders. Our ability to continue our development activities over the long-term depends upon our ability to locate and acquire suitable parcels of land or developed homesites to support our homebuilding operations. As competition for land increases, the cost of acquiring it may rise, and the availability of suitable parcels at acceptable prices may decline. If we are unable to acquire suitable land or developed homesites at reasonable prices, it could limit our ability to develop new projects or result in increased land costs that we may not be able to pass through to our customers. Consequently, it could reduce our earnings and profit margins.

 
We may not be successful in our effort to identify, complete or integrate acquisitions, which could adversely affect our results of operations and future growth.

      A principal component of our strategy is to continue to grow profitably in a controlled manner, including, where appropriate, by acquiring other property developers or homebuilders. We may not be successful in implementing our acquisition strategy, and growth may not continue at historical levels or at all. We completed the merger with Engle Homes on June 25, 2002, we acquired the assets of D.S. Ware Homes and Masonry Homes in the fourth quarter of 2002, and we acquired the assets of Trophy Homes and The James Construction Company in the first quarter of 2003. The failure to identify or complete business acquisitions, or successfully integrate the businesses we acquire, could adversely affect our results of operations and future growth. Specifically, any delays or difficulties in converting our various information systems or implementing our internal policies and procedures could increase costs and otherwise affect our results of operations. Even if we overcome these challenges and risks, we may not realize the expected benefits of our acquisitions.

 
We may need additional financing to fund our operations or for the expansion of our business, and if we are unable to obtain sufficient financing or such financing is obtained on adverse terms, we may not be able to operate or expand our business as planned, which could adversely affect our results of operations and future growth.

      Our operations require significant amounts of cash. If our business does not achieve the levels of profitability or generate the amount of cash that we anticipate or if we expand through acquisitions or organic growth faster than anticipated, we may need to seek additional debt or equity financing to operate and expand our business. If we are unable to obtain sufficient financing to fund our operations or expansion, it could adversely affect our results of operations and future growth. We may be unable to obtain additional financing on satisfactory terms or at all. If we raise additional funds through the incurrence of debt, we will incur increased debt service costs and may become subject to additional restrictive financial and other covenants.

15



Table of Contents

 
Technical Olympic, our majority stockholder, can cause us to take certain actions or preclude us from taking actions without the approval of the other stockholders and may have interests that could conflict with your interests.

      Technical Olympic currently owns 90.73% of the voting power of our common stock and will own approximately 83.56% after the proposed offering of our common stock by Technical Olympic (82.48% if the underwriters’ over-allotment option is exercised in full). As a result, Technical Olympic has the ability to control the outcome of virtually all corporate actions requiring stockholder approval, including the election of a majority of our directors, the approval of any merger and other significant corporate actions. Technical Olympic may authorize actions or have interests that could conflict with your interests.

Risks Related to Our Industry

 
Changes in economic or other business conditions could adversely affect demand and prices for new homes, which could decrease our revenues.

      The homebuilding industry historically has been cyclical and is affected significantly by adverse changes in general and local economic conditions, such as:

  •  employment levels;
 
  •  population growth;
 
  •  consumer confidence and stability of income levels;
 
  •  availability of financing for land and homesite acquisitions, construction and permanent mortgages;
 
  •  interest rates;
 
  •  inventory levels of both new and existing homes;
 
  •  supply of rental properties; and
 
  •  conditions in the housing resale market.

      Adverse changes in one or more of these conditions, all of which are outside of our control, could reduce demand and/or prices for new homes in some or all of the markets in which we operate. A decline in demand or the prices we can obtain for our homes could decrease our revenues.

 
We are subject to substantial risks with respect to the land and home inventories we maintain, and fluctuations in market conditions may affect our ability to sell our land and home inventories at expected prices, if at all, which would reduce our profit margins.

      As a homebuilder, we must constantly locate and acquire new tracts of land for development and developed homesites to support our homebuilding operations. There is a lag between the time we acquire land for development or developed homesites and the time that we can bring the communities to market and sell homes. Lag time varies on a project-by-project basis; however, historically, we have experienced a lag time of approximately 9 to 12 months. As a result, we face the risk that demand for housing may decline during this period and that we will not be able to dispose of developed properties or undeveloped land or homesites acquired for development at expected prices or within anticipated time frames or at all. The market value of home inventories, undeveloped land and developed homesites can fluctuate significantly because of changing market conditions. In addition, inventory carrying costs (including interest on funds used to acquire land or build homes) can be significant and can adversely affect our performance. Because of these factors, we may be forced to sell homes or other property at a loss or for prices that generate lower profit margins than we anticipate. We may also be required to make material write-downs of the book value of our real estate assets in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles if values decline.

16



Table of Contents

 
Supply risks and shortages relating to labor and materials can harm our business by delaying construction and increasing costs.

      The homebuilding industry from time to time has experienced significant difficulties with respect to:

  •  shortages of qualified trades people and other labor;
 
  •  inadequately capitalized local subcontractors;
 
  •  shortages of materials; and
 
  •  volatile increases in the cost of certain materials, including lumber, framing and cement, which are significant components of home construction costs.

      These difficulties can, and often do, cause unexpected short-term increases in construction costs and cause construction delays. In addition, to the extent our subcontractors incur increased costs associated with recent increases in insurance premiums and compliance with state and local regulations, these costs are passed on to us as homebuilders. We are generally unable to pass on any unexpected increases in construction costs to those customers who have already entered into sales contracts, as those contracts generally fix the price of the house at the time the contract is signed, which may be up to one year in advance of the delivery of the home. Furthermore, sustained increases in construction costs may, over time, erode our profit margins. We have historically been able to offset sustained increases in the costs of materials with increases in the prices of our homes and through operating efficiencies. However, in the future, pricing competition may restrict our ability to pass on any additional costs, and we may not be able to achieve sufficient operating efficiencies to maintain our current profit margins.

 
Future increases in interest rates or a decrease in the availability of government-sponsored mortgage financing could prevent potential customers from purchasing our homes, which would adversely affect our revenues and profitability.

      Almost all of our customers finance their purchases through mortgage financing obtained from us or other sources. Increases in interest rates or decreases in the availability of Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Federal Housing Administration or Veteran’s Association mortgage financing could cause a decline in the market for new homes as potential homebuyers may not be able to obtain affordable financing. Increased interest rates can also limit our ability to realize our backlog because our sales contracts typically provide our customers with a financing contingency. Financing contingencies allow customers to cancel their home purchase contracts in the event they cannot arrange for financing at interest rates that were prevailing when they signed their contracts. In particular, because the availability of mortgage financing is an important factor in marketing many of our homes, any limitations or restrictions on the availability of those types of financing could reduce our home sales and the lending volume at our mortgage subsidiary. Even if our potential customers do not need financing, changes in interest rates and mortgage availability could make it harder for them to sell their existing homes to potential buyers who need financing. Interest rates currently are at one of their lowest levels in decades, and any future increases in interest rates could adversely affect our revenues and profitability.

 
The competitive conditions in the homebuilding industry could increase our costs, reduce our revenues, and otherwise adversely affect our results of operations.

      The homebuilding industry is highly competitive and fragmented. We compete in each of our markets with numerous national, regional and local builders. Some of these builders have greater financial resources, more experience, more established market positions and better opportunities for land and homesite acquisitions than we do and have lower costs of capital, labor and material than us. Builders of

17



Table of Contents

new homes compete for homebuyers, as well as for desirable properties, raw materials and skilled subcontractors. The competitive conditions in the homebuilding industry could, among other things:

  •  increase our costs and reduce our revenues;
 
  •  make it difficult for us to acquire suitable land or homesites at acceptable prices;
 
  •  require us to increase selling commissions and other incentives;
 
  •  result in delays in construction if we experience a delay in procuring materials or hiring laborers; and
 
  •  result in lower sales volumes.

      We also compete with resales of existing homes, available rental housing and, to a lesser extent, condominium resales. An oversupply of attractively priced resale or rental homes in the markets in which we operate could adversely affect our ability to sell homes profitably.

      Our financial services operations are also subject to competition from third-party providers, many of which are substantially larger, may have a lower cost of funds or overhead than we do, and may focus exclusively on providing such services.

 
We are subject to product liability and warranty claims arising in the ordinary course of business that could adversely affect our results of operations.

      As a homebuilder, we are subject in the ordinary course of our business to product liability and home warranty claims. We provide our homebuyers with a one-year or two-year limited warranty covering workmanship and materials and an eight-year or ten-year limited warranty covering major structural defects. Claims arising under these warranties and general product liability claims are common in the homebuilding industry and can be costly. Although we maintain product liability insurance, the coverage offered by, and availability of, product liability insurance for construction defects is currently limited and, where coverage is available, it may be costly. We recently obtained a homebuilder protective policy which covers warranty claims for structure and design defects related to homes sold by us during the policy period, subject to a retention amount. However, our product liability insurance and homebuilder protective policies contain limitations with respect to coverage, and there can be no assurance that these insurance rights will be adequate to cover all product liability and warranty claims for which we may be liable or that coverage will not be further restricted and become more costly. In addition, although we generally seek to require our subcontractors and design professionals to indemnify us for liabilities arising from their work, we may be unable to enforce any such contractual indemnities. Uninsured and unindemnified product liability and warranty claims, as well as the cost of product liability insurance and our homebuilder protective policy, could adversely affect our results of operations.

 
We are subject to mold litigation and claims arising in the ordinary course of business that could adversely affect our results of operations.

      Recently, lawsuits have been filed against homebuilders and insurers asserting claims of property damages and personal injury caused by the presence of mold in residential dwellings. Some of these lawsuits have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or settlements. It is possible that insurance carriers may exclude coverage for claims arising from the presence of mold. Uninsured mold liability and claims could adversely affect our results of operations.

 
States, cities and counties in which we operate have, or may adopt, slow or no growth initiatives which would reduce our ability to build in these areas and could adversely affect our future revenues.

      Several states, cities and counties in which we operate have approved, and others in which we operate may approve, various “slow growth” or “no growth” initiatives and other ballot measures that could negatively impact the availability of land and building opportunities within those localities. Approval of slow or no growth measures would reduce our ability to build and sell homes in the affected markets and

18



Table of Contents

create additional costs and administration requirements, which in turn could have an adverse effect on our future revenues.
 
Our business is subject to governmental regulations that may delay, increase the cost of, prohibit or severely restrict our development and homebuilding projects.

      We are subject to extensive and complex laws and regulations that affect the land development and homebuilding process, including laws and regulations related to zoning, permitted land uses, levels of density, building design, elevation of properties, water and waste disposal and use of open spaces. In addition, we and our subcontractors are subject to laws and regulations relating to workers health and safety. We also are subject to a variety of local, state and federal laws and regulations concerning the protection of health and the environment. In some of the markets in which we operate, we are required to pay environmental impact fees, use energy saving construction materials and give commitments to provide certain infrastructure such as roads and sewage systems. We must also obtain permits and approvals from local authorities to complete residential development or home construction. The laws and regulations under which we and our subcontractors operate, and our and their obligations to comply with them, may result in delays in construction and development, cause us to incur substantial compliance and other increased costs, and prohibit or severely restrict development and homebuilding activity in certain areas in which we operate.

      Our financial services operations are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations. Failure to comply with these requirements can lead to administrative enforcement actions, the loss of required licenses and claims for monetary damages.

 
Our business revenues and profitability may be adversely affected by natural disasters or weather conditions.

      Homebuilders are particularly subject to natural disasters and severe weather conditions as it can delay our ability to timely complete homes, damage the partially complete or other unsold homes that are in our inventory and/or negatively impact the demand for homes. Our operations are located in many areas that are especially subject to natural disasters. To the extent that hurricanes, severe storms, floods, tornadoes or other natural disasters or similar weather events occur, our business may be adversely affected. To the extent our insurance is not adequate to cover business interruption or losses resulting from these events, our revenues and profitability may be adversely affected.

Risks Related to the Notes

 
We may not have sufficient funds to satisfy our repurchase obligations that arise upon a change in control or a decline in our consolidated net worth.

      If a change of control occurs, we will be required, subject to certain conditions, to offer to purchase all outstanding notes plus all of our other outstanding senior and senior subordinated notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the date of purchase.

      In addition, if our consolidated net worth falls below $150.0 million for any two consecutive fiscal quarters, we are required to make an offer to purchase at least 10% of the aggregate principal amount of these notes, the June 2002 Senior Subordinated Notes and the senior notes we offered in June 2002 and February 2003 (we refer to these as the Senior Notes) then outstanding at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, together with accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. As of March 31, 2003, on a consolidated basis, our net worth was $963.2 million.

      As of March 31, 2003, we did not have sufficient funds available to purchase all of our outstanding notes were they to be tendered in response to an offer made as a result of a change of control. In addition, we may not have sufficient funds available, from time to time, to fund a net worth offer. The source of funds for any purchase of these notes in either event will be our available cash or cash generated from our operations or other sources, including borrowings, sales of assets or sales of equity. If we do not have

19



Table of Contents

sufficient cash on hand, we could seek to refinance the debt under our credit facility, all of our outstanding notes and our other debt or obtain a waiver from the lenders or the holders of our outstanding notes, as the case may be. We may not, however, be able to obtain a waiver or refinance our debt on satisfactory terms, or at all. In addition, the indenture for the notes restricts our ability to make a change of control offer for any subordinated notes to the extent we cannot comply with the covenant described under “Description of the Notes — Certain Covenants — Limitation on Restricted Payments.”

      Our failure to purchase, or give notice of purchase of, the notes would be a default under the indenture for the notes, which would in turn be a default under our credit facility. In addition, a change of control will constitute an event of default under our credit facility. A default under our credit facility would result in an event of default under the indenture for the notes if the lenders were to accelerate the debt under the credit facility. Furthermore, if the holders of the notes exercise their right to require us to repurchase notes in either event, the financial effect of this repurchase could cause a default under our other debt, even if the event itself would not cause a default.

 
Your right to receive payments on the notes and the guarantees is unsecured and will be effectively subordinated to our existing and future senior debt, which could result in situations where there are not sufficient funds available to pay the notes.

      Payment on the notes will be subordinated in right of payment to all of our senior debt, including our revolving credit facility and the Senior Notes. Payment on the guarantee of each guarantor of the notes will be subordinated in right of payment to that guarantor’s senior debt, including its guarantee of our revolving credit facility and the Senior Notes. Upon any distribution to our creditors or the creditors of the guarantors in a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization or similar proceeding relating to us or the guarantors or our or their property, the holders of senior debt will be entitled to be paid in full in cash before any payment may be made on the notes or the guarantees thereof, as the case may be. In these cases, we or a guarantor, as the case may be, may not have sufficient funds to pay all of our or its creditors and holders of the notes may receive less, ratably, than the holders of senior debt, including our revolving credit facility and the Senior Notes, and due to the turnover provisions in the notes indenture, less ratably than the holders of unsubordinated obligations, including trade payables. In addition, all payments on the notes and the related guarantees will be blocked in the event of a payment default on any senior debt and may be blocked for up to 179 consecutive days in the event of certain non-payment defaults on designated senior debt.

      As of March 31, 2003, as adjusted for the offering of the old notes and the application of the net proceeds, the notes would have been junior in right of payment to $355.4 million of senior debt. As of March 31, 2003, as adjusted for the offering of the old notes and the application of the net proceeds, the related guarantees of all the guarantors, other than Preferred Home Mortgage Company and Pacific United LP, would have been junior in right of payment to $316.0 million of senior debt; the guarantee of Preferred Home Mortgage Company would have been junior in right of payment to $350.6 million of senior debt; and the guarantee of Pacific United LP would have been junior in right of payment to $320.8 million of senior debt. As of March 31, 2003, as adjusted for the offering of the old notes and the application of the net proceeds, and the amendment of our revolving credit facility, we could have incurred up to $251.5 million of additional senior debt, which would be senior in right of payment to the notes.

 
Your right to receive payments on the notes and the guarantees is unsecured and will be effectively subordinated to our existing and future secured debt, which could result in situations where there are not sufficient funds available to pay the notes.

      The notes are effectively subordinated to claims of our secured creditors and the guarantees of each guarantor are effectively subordinated to the claims of the existing and future secured creditors of that guarantor. Our revolving credit facility, our warehouse line of credit and certain of our development loans are secured obligations. At March 31, 2003, we had approximately $89.4 million aggregate principal amount of secured debt outstanding. At March 31, 2003, as adjusted for the offering of the old notes and the application of the net proceeds, and the amendment of our revolving credit facility, we would have had

20



Table of Contents

the capacity to borrow an additional $221.1 million under our revolving credit facility and $30.4 million under our warehouse line of credit, all of which would be secured senior debt and effectively senior to the notes in right of payment.
 
Our holding company structure could limit our ability to access the cash flow of our non-guarantor subsidiaries and the ability of the holders of the notes to access the assets of those subsidiaries will be effectively subordinated to those subsidiaries’ other obligations thereby resulting in less cash flow and assets to support the notes.

      Substantially all of our operations are conducted through our subsidiaries. Therefore, our ability to service our debt, including the notes, is dependent upon the cash flows of those subsidiaries and, to the extent they are not guarantors, their ability to distribute those cash flows as dividends, loans or other payments to the entities which are obligors under the notes and the guarantees. If their ability to make these distributions were restricted, by law or otherwise, then we would not be able to use the earnings of the non-guarantor subsidiaries to make payments on the notes. In addition, our subsidiaries that are not guarantors may have liabilities, including trade payables and contingent liabilities, that may be significant. Our rights as an equity holder of those subsidiaries to receive any of their assets, upon a liquidation or reorganization, and therefore the right of the holders of the notes to participant in those assets, effectively will be subordinated to the claims of those subsidiaries’ creditors, including trade creditors, if any.

 
Your ability to enforce the guarantees of the notes may be limited because the guarantees may potentially raise fraudulent transfer issues.

      Although the notes are our obligations, they are unconditionally guaranteed on a senior subordinated unsecured basis by all of our material domestic subsidiaries. The performance by each guarantor of its obligations with respect to its guarantee may be subject to review under relevant federal and state fraudulent conveyance and similar statutes in a bankruptcy or reorganization case or lawsuit by or on behalf of unpaid creditors of such guarantor. Under these statutes, if a court were to find under relevant federal or state fraudulent conveyance statutes that a guarantor did not receive fair consideration or reasonably equivalent value for incurring its guarantee of the notes, and that, at the time of such incurrence, the guarantor:

  •  was insolvent;
 
  •  was rendered insolvent by reason of such incurrence or grant;
 
  •  was engaged in a business or transaction for which the assets remaining with such guarantor constituted unreasonably small capital; or
 
  •  intended to incur, or believed that it would incur, debts beyond its ability to pay such debts as they matured;

then the court, subject to applicable statutes of limitation, could void the guarantors obligations under its guarantee, recover payments made under the guarantee, subordinate the guarantee to other indebtedness of the guarantor or take other action detrimental to the holders of the notes.

      A court could also avoid an incurrence of indebtedness, including the guarantees, if it determined that such transaction was made with the intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors. In addition, a court could subordinate the indebtedness, including the guarantees, to the claims of all existing and future creditors on similar grounds. The guarantees could also be subject to the claim that, since the guarantees were incurred for our benefit (and only indirectly for the benefit of the subsidiary guarantors), the obligations of the guarantors under the guarantees were incurred for less than reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration.

21



Table of Contents

 
Your ability to transfer the notes may be limited by the absence of a trading market.

      There is no established trading market for the notes, and neither the old notes nor the new notes will be listed on any securities exchange or quoted on any automated dealer quotation system. We expect the notes to be eligible for trading in the PORTAL Market.

      The initial purchaser has indicated to us that it intends to make a market in the old notes and the new notes, but it is not obliged to do so. The initial purchaser may discontinue any market making in the old notes or the new notes at anytime in its sole discretion. Accordingly, we cannot ensure that a liquid market will develop for any, of the old notes or the new notes, that you will be able to sell your old notes or the new notes at a particular time or that the prices that you receive when you sell will be favorable. Future trading prices of the old notes or the new notes will depend on many factors, including, our operating performance and financial condition, our ability to complete the offer to exchange the old notes for new notes, prevailing interest rates and the market for similar securities. Historically, the market for non-investment grade debt has been subject to disruptions that have caused substantial volatility in the prices of securities similar to the notes. Any such disruptions may adversely affect the ability of holders of notes to dispose of them for a profit or at all.

22



Table of Contents

 

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

      This prospectus contains “forward-looking statements.” Discussions containing forward-looking statements may be found in the material set forth in the sections entitled “Summary,” “Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

      These statements concern expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. Specifically, this prospectus contains forward-looking statements regarding:

  •  our expectations regarding growth opportunities in the homebuilding industry and our ability to successfully take advantage of such opportunities to expand our operations and maximize our financial returns;
 
  •  our expectations regarding population growth and median income growth trends and their impact on future housing demand in our markets;
 
  •  our expectation regarding the impact of geographic and customer diversification;
 
  •  our expectations that strong demand for new housing in our current markets will contribute to our growth;
 
  •  our belief that by leveraging our current operations, we will, over time, maximize our financial returns, strengthen our margins and increase our revenues and profitability;
 
  •  our ability to successfully integrate our current operations and any future acquisitions, and to recognize anticipated operating efficiencies, cost savings and revenue increases;
 
  •  our expectations regarding our land and homesite acquisition strategy and its impact on our business;
 
  •  our belief that homes in premier locations will continue to attract homebuyers in both strong and weak economic conditions;
 
  •  our intention to grow the financial services business;
 
  •  our belief regarding growth opportunities within our financial services business;
 
  •  our expectations regarding the impact of our business initiatives on our ability to capture repeat business, to minimize our exposure to adverse economic conditions and to increase our revenue;
 
  •  our expectations regarding the implementation of the Performance Improvement Plan and best practices initiatives across our operating divisions;
 
  •  our belief that we have adequate financial resources to meet our current and anticipated working capital and land and homesite acquisition and development needs;
 
  •  our expectation that we will continue to incur significant professional and other fees only through the third quarter of 2003;
 
  •  the impact of inflation on our future results of operations; and
 
  •  our ability to pass through to our customers any increases in our costs in the form of increased sales prices.

      These forward-looking statements reflect our current views about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. We caution readers that certain important factors may have affected and could in the future affect our actual results and could cause actual results to differ significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statement. The most important factors that could prevent us from achieving our goals, and cause the assumptions underlying forward-looking statements and the actual

23



Table of Contents

results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by those forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:

  •  our significant level of debt and the impact of the restrictions imposed on us by the terms of this debt;
 
  •  our ability to borrow or otherwise finance our business in the future;
 
  •  our ability to identify and acquire, at anticipated prices, additional homebuilding opportunities;
 
  •  our ability to successfully integrate and to realize the expected benefits of recent acquisitions;
 
  •  economic or other business conditions that affect the desire or ability of our customers to purchase new homes in markets in which we conduct our business;
 
  •  a decline in the demand for, or the prices of, housing;
 
  •  a decline in the value of the land and home inventories we maintain;
 
  •  an increase in the cost of, or shortages in the availability of, skilled labor or construction materials;
 
  •  an increase in interest rates;
 
  •  our ability to successfully dispose of developed properties or undeveloped land or homesites at expected prices and within anticipated time frames;
 
  •  our ability to compete in our existing and future markets; and
 
  •  an increase or change in governmental regulations.

      We urge you to review carefully the section entitled “Risk Factors” in this prospectus for a more complete discussion of the risks related to our business and industry.

24



Table of Contents

 

USE OF PROCEEDS

      We will not receive any proceeds from the issuance of the new notes offered in the exchange offer. In consideration for issuing the new notes, we will receive in exchange old notes in like principal amount the terms of which are identical in all respects to the new notes except for the transfer restrictions and registration rights. The old notes surrendered in exchange for new notes will be retired and cancelled and cannot be reissued. Accordingly, issuance of the new notes will not result in any increase in our indebtedness.

      The net proceeds from the sale of the old notes was approximately $34.5 million, after deducting the underwriting discount and the offering expenses payable by us. We used the net proceeds to repay $34.5 million of the $65.0 million of outstanding debt under our revolving credit facility on the date we issued the old notes. At March 31, 2003, the weighted average interest rate on the loans outstanding under our revolving credit facility was 5.5% per annum. The loans were scheduled to mature on June 25, 2005. Amounts borrowed under our revolving credit facility were used to acquire Trophy Homes and The James Construction Company, to fund land acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.

25



Table of Contents

 

CAPITALIZATION

      The following table sets forth our consolidated capitalization as of March 31, 2003 on a historical basis and as adjusted for the sale of the old notes and the application of the net proceeds. You should read this table in conjunction with “Selected Financial Data” included elsewhere in this prospectus and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

                     
As of March 31, 2003

Actual As Adjusted


(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Cash and cash equivalents:
               
 
Unrestricted
  $ 49,079     $ 49,079  
 
Restricted(1)
  $ 37,851     $ 37,851  
     
     
 
   
Total cash and cash equivalents
  $ 86,930     $ 86,930  
     
     
 
Debt:
               
 
Revolving credit facility(2)
  $ 50,000     $ 15,000  
 
9% Senior Notes
    300,000       300,000  
 
10 3/8% Senior Subordinated Notes
    150,000       185,000  
 
Other(3)
    5,642       5,642  
     
     
 
   
Total homebuilding borrowings
    505,642       505,642  
     
     
 
 
Financial services borrowings(4)
    34,604       34,604  
     
     
 
   
Total borrowings
    540,246       540,246  
     
     
 
Common stock $.01 par value (67,000,000 shares authorized and 27,889,036 shares issued and outstanding)
    279       279  
Additional paid-in capital
    322,560       322,560  
Retained earnings
    100,122       100,122  
     
     
 
   
Total stockholders’ equity
    422,961       422,961  
     
     
 
   
Total capitalization
  $ 963,207     $ 963,207  
     
     
 


(1)  Represents deposits held in escrow by our title subsidiaries pursuant to purchase contracts or as required by law and compensating balances under letters of credit.
 
(2)  As of July 14, 2003, we had approximately $65.0 million outstanding under the revolving credit facility.
 
(3)  Represents primarily construction and homesite loans from financial institutions.
 
(4)  Represents a warehouse line of credit used to provide financing for the origination of mortgage loans.

26



Table of Contents

 

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

      The following table sets forth our selected financial data and other operating information. The selected financial data in the table for the five years ended December 31, 2002 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The selected financial data in the table for the three month periods ended March 31, 2002 and 2003 have been derived from unaudited financial statements. The unaudited financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, which we consider necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations for these periods. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year ending December 31, 2003. The data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, related notes, and other financial information included herein.

                                                           
Three Months Ended
Year Ended December 31, March 31,


1998 1999(1) 2000(2)(3) 2001(2)(3) 2002(2)(3) 2002(2)(3) 2003







(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
Statement of Income Data:
                                                       
Homebuilding:
                                                       
 
Revenues
  $ 406,353     $ 420,748     $ 546,666     $ 1,392,912     $ 1,377,092     $ 302,538     $ 315,880  
 
Cost of Sales
    339,094       345,592       440,939       1,108,286       1,100,305       240,075       248,121  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Gross profit
    67,259       75,156       105,727       284,626       276,787       62,463       67,759  
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    43,614       47,503       63,832       152,063       163,726       37,704       43,790  
 
Depreciation and amortization
    3,287       2,239       3,112       8,849       5,952       1,631       1,646  
 
Severance and merger related expenses
                      2,643       19,963       13,828        
 
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
                            5,411              
 
Other income, net
    (74 )     867       2,264       (3,941 )     (5,838 )     (222 )     (1,019 )
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Homebuilding pretax income
    20,432       24,547       36,519       125,012       87,573       9,522       23,342  
Financial services:
                                                       
 
Revenues
                2,562       32,659       40,214       7,954       10,645  
 
Expenses
                1,635       17,688       20,846       3,780       6,160  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Financial services pretax income
                927       14,971       19,368       4,174       4,485  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    20,432       24,547       37,446       139,983       106,941       13,696       27,827  
Income tax expense
    7,637       8,721       13,672       52,218       39,900       4,767       10,171  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income from continuing operations
  $ 12,795     $ 15,826     $ 23,774     $ 87,765     $ 67,041     $ 8,929     $ 17,656  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Per Share Data:
                                                       
Income from continuing operations (basic and diluted)
  $ 1.16     $ 1.38     $ 1.79     $ 3.15     $ 2.40     $ 0.32     $ 0.63  
Income from discontinued operations (basic and diluted)
  $     $ 0.13     $ 0.48     $ 0.22     $ 0.18     $ 0.02     $  
Book value based on shares outstanding at end of period
  $ 7.84     $ 9.53     $ 12.74     $ 14.83     $ 14.53     $     $ 15.17  
Cash dividends(4)
  $     $     $     $ 0.22     $     $     $  
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (basic and diluted)
    11,035,342       11,500,000       13,250,062       27,878,787       27,878,787       27,878,787       27,882,090  

27



Table of Contents

                                                         
Other Financial Data:
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(5)
    2.4 x     3.2 x     3.2 x     6.8 x     4.6 x     4.6 x     3.1 x
Operating Data:
                                                       
Homes delivered
    1,874       1,620       1,994       5,304       5,085       1,146       1,234  
Average sales price, per home delivered
  $ 216     $ 255     $ 271     $ 259     $ 265     $ 264     $ 254  
New sales contracts, net of cancellations
    2,036       1,569       1,819       4,967       5,009       1,408       1,632  
Backlog at end of period, number of homes
    753       540       2,486       2,149       2,280       2,411       2,826  
Backlog at end of period, sales value
  $ 170,402     $ 137,582     $ 629,348     $ 573,405     $ 636,922     $ 651,273     $ 763,965  
         
As of March 31, 2003

(Dollars in thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:
       
Inventory
  $ 853,841  
Total assets
  $ 1,148,923  
Homebuilding borrowings
  $ 505,642  
Total borrowings(6)
  $ 540,246  
Stockholders’ equity
  $ 422,961  


(1)  Technical Olympic acquired 80% of our common stock on December 15, 1999. Consequently, our audited financial statements for 1999 present the results of operations in two columns on a predecessor and successor basis. The predecessor column includes the results of operations from January 1, 1999 to December 15, 1999. The successor column includes the results of operations from December 16, 1999 to December 31, 1999. In the above table, the financial data reflects our operations on a full-year basis, which represents the total of the predecessor and successor columns.
 
(2)  On June 25, 2002, we completed the merger with Engle Holdings. As both entities were under the common control of Technical Olympic, the merger was accounted for as a reorganization of entities under common control. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141, “Business Combinations,” we recognized the acquired assets and liabilities of Engle Holdings at their historical carrying amounts. As both entities came under common control of Technical Olympic on November 22, 2000, our financial statements and other operating data have been restated to include the operations of Engle Holdings from November 22, 2000. See note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
 
(3)  On April 15, 2002, we completed the sale of Westbrooke, formerly one of our Florida homebuilding subsidiaries. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the results of Westbrooke’s operations have been classified as discontinued operations and prior periods have been restated. See note 8 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
 
(4)  Cash dividends per share have been restated to reflect the total shares outstanding as a result of the merger with Engle Holdings.
 
(5)  For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings represents the sum of income from continuing operating before income taxes and before adjustments for minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries and income or loss from equity investments, distributed income from equity investments, interest amortized in cost of sale, amortization of deferred finance costs, interest expense and the portion of rent expense deemed to represent interest. Fixed charges include interest

28



Table of Contents

incurred, whether expensed or capitalized, including amortization of deferred finance costs and the portion of rent expense deemed to represent interest.
 
(6)  Total borrowings includes Homebuilding borrowings and Financial Services borrowings.

29



Table of Contents

 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

      We generate our revenues from our homebuilding operations (“Homebuilding”) and financial services operations (“Financial Services”). In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” we have determined that Homebuilding and Financial Services comprise our operating segments. Through our Homebuilding operations, we design, build and market high-quality detached single-family residences, town homes and condominiums in 14 metropolitan markets located in four major geographic regions: Florida, the Mid-Atlantic, Texas and the West.

             
Florida Mid-Atlantic Texas West




Jacksonville
  Baltimore/Southern Pennsylvania   Austin   Colorado
Orlando
  Nashville   Dallas/Ft. Worth   Las Vegas
Southeast Florida
  Northern Virginia   Houston   Phoenix
Southwest Florida
      San Antonio    

      Our Homebuilding operations generate the majority of their revenue from the sale of homes to homebuyers and to a lesser degree from the sale of land and homesites to other homebuilders. Our homes are designed to appeal to a diverse group of homebuyers, such as “first-time” homebuyers, “move-up” homebuyers, homebuyers who are relocating to a new city or state, buyers of second or vacation homes, active-adult homebuyers and homebuyers with grown children who want a smaller home (“empty-nesters”). Our homes are generally offered for sale in advance of their construction. Once a sales contract has been signed, we classify the transaction as a “new sales contract” and include the home in “backlog.” Such sales contracts are usually subject to certain contingencies such as the buyer’s ability to qualify for financing. Revenue from the sale of homes and the sale of land is recognized at closing when title passes to the buyer. At this point a home is considered to be “delivered.” The principal expenses of our Homebuilding operations are (i) cost of sales and (ii) selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses. Homebuilding cost of sales consists primarily of the cost of home construction, the acquisition cost of land and the cost of land development. SG&A expenses for our Homebuilding operations include administrative costs, advertising expenses, on-site marketing expenses, commission costs and closing costs.

      At March 31, 2003 we were marketing homes in 176 communities; by comparison, at March 31, 2002 we were marketing homes in 141 communities.

      As part of our objective to provide homebuyers a seamless home purchasing experience, we have developed, and are expanding, our complementary financial services business. As part of this business, we provide mortgage financing and closing services and offer title, homeowners’ and other insurance products. Our mortgage financing operation derives most of its revenues from buyers of our homes, although it also offers its services to existing homeowners refinancing their mortgages. By comparison, our closing services and our insurance agency operations, are used by our homebuyers as well as a broad range of other clients purchasing or refinancing residential or commercial real estate. Mortgage financing operations revenues consist primarily of origination and premium fee income, credit application fee income and the gain on the sale of the mortgages. Title operations revenues consist primarily of title insurance and closing services. All of our underwriting risk associated with title and homeowners’ insurance policies is transferred to third-party insurers. The principal expenses of our Financial Services operations are SG&A expenses, which consist primarily of compensation and interest expense on our warehouse line of credit.

Recent Transactions

      On June 26, 2003, we filed a registration statement relating to the proposed sale by Technical Olympic, our principal stockholder, of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock held by them. The underwriters named in the registration statement have an option to purchase up to an additional 300,000

30



Table of Contents

shares of our common stock from Technical Olympic. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of common stock by Technical Olympic. Technical Olympic currently owns 90.73% of our common stock and will own approximately 83.56% after consummation of the proposed offering, or 82.48% if the underwriters exercise the over-allotment option in full. The registration statement has not yet been declared effective by the Commission.

      On April 4, 2003, we amended our revolving credit facility to increase the amount we are permitted to borrow to the lesser of (i) $305.0 million or (ii) our borrowing base (calculated in accordance with the revolving credit facility agreement) minus our outstanding senior debt, and to increase the amount of the letter of credit subfacility to $80.0 million. Subsequently, we increased the size of the facility to provide up to an additional $10.0 million of revolving loans. In addition, we have the right to increase the size of the facility to provide for up to an additional $10.0 million of revolving loans, subject to meeting certain requirements.

      On February 28, 2003, we acquired the net assets of The James Construction Company, a homebuilder operating in the greater Denver, Colorado area, for approximately $22.0 million in cash. In addition, we are obligated to pay an additional $1.4 million to the sellers over a two-year period.

      On February 6, 2003, we acquired the net assets of Trophy Homes, Inc., a homebuilder operating in Las Vegas, Nevada, and certain homesites for approximately $36.2 million. In addition, if certain targets are met regarding home deliveries during 2003 and 2004, we will be obligated to pay up to $2.5 million over a two-year period.

      On February 3, 2003, we issued $100.0 million of 9% Senior Notes due 2010, which we refer to as the “February 2003 Senior Notes,” at a price of 94.836% of the principal amount plus interest accrued since January 1, 2003. The net proceeds of approximately $93.6 million were primarily used to repay amounts outstanding under our credit facility. The February 2003 Senior Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture with the same terms and conditions as the $200.0 million of 9% Senior Notes due 2010 that we issued in June 2002.

Critical Accounting Policies

      In the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, we apply accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The application of generally accepted accounting principles may require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying results. Listed below are those policies that we believe are critical and require the use of complex judgment in their application.

 
Homebuilding Revenues and Cost of Sales

      Revenue from the sale of homes and the sale of land and homesites is recognized at closing when title passes to the buyer and all of the following conditions are met: a sale is consummated; a significant down payment is received; the earnings process is complete; and the collection of any remaining receivables is reasonably assured. As a result, our revenue recognition process does not involve significant judgments or estimates. However, we do rely on certain estimates to determine the related construction and land costs and resulting gross profit associated with revenues recognized. Our construction and land costs are comprised of direct and allocated costs, including indirect construction costs and estimated costs for future warranties and indemnities. Our estimates are based on historical results, adjusted for current factors. Land, land improvements and other common costs are generally allocated on a relative fair value basis to units within a parcel or community. Land and land development costs generally include related interest and property taxes incurred until construction is substantially completed.

 
Financial Services Revenues and Expenses

      Our Financial Services operations generates revenues from mortgage and title operations. Our mortgage operations revenues consist primarily of origination and premium fee income, credit application

31



Table of Contents

fee income and the gain on the sale of the mortgages. Revenue from our mortgage operations is generally recognized when the mortgage loans and related servicing rights are sold to third-party investors. Substantially all of our mortgages are sold to private investors within 30 days of closing. Title operations revenues consist primarily of title insurance agency and closing services, which are recognized as home sales are closed. As a result, our revenue recognition process does not involve significant judgments or estimates.
 
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

      Housing projects and land/homesites under development are stated at the lower of costs or net realizable value. Property and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. We assess these assets for impairment in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” SFAS No. 144 requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. These evaluations for impairment are significantly impacted by estimates of revenues, costs and expenses and other factors. If these assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment loss to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.

 
Goodwill

      Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142, goodwill is no longer subject to amortization. Goodwill is subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair value-based test. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, goodwill is considered to be impaired. We continually evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate the remaining balance of goodwill may not be recoverable. In evaluating impairment, we estimate the sum of the expected future cash flows derived from such goodwill. Such evaluations for impairment are significantly impacted by estimates of future revenues, costs and expenses and other factors. If the goodwill is considered to be impaired, the impairment loss to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the fair value of the expected future cash flows.

 
Homesite Option Contracts

      We enter into option contracts with land sellers and third-party financial entities as a method of acquiring developed homesites. From time to time to leverage our ability to acquire and finance the development of these homesites, we transfer our option right to third parties. Option contracts generally require the payment of a non-refundable cash deposit or the issuance of a letter of credit for the right to acquire homesites over a specified period of time at predetermined prices. Typically, our deposits or letters of credit are less than 20% of the underlying purchase price. We generally have the right at our discretion to terminate our obligations under these option agreements by forfeiting our cash deposit or repaying amounts drawn under the letter of credit with no further financial responsibility. We do not have legal title to these assets. Additionally, we do not have an investment in the third-party acquirer and do not guarantee their liabilities. However, if certain conditions are met, including the deposit and/or letters of credit exceeding certain significance levels as compared to the remaining homesites under the option contract, we will include the homesites in inventory with a corresponding liability in consolidated land bank obligations. At March 31, 2003, we owned 11,301 homesites, or 36.0% of our homesite supply, and had option contracts on 20,350 homesites, or 64.0% of our homesite supply.

 
Warranty Reserves

      In the normal course of business we will incur warranty related costs associated with homes which have been delivered to the homebuyers. Warranty reserves are established by charging cost of sales and recognizing a liability for the estimated warranty costs for each home that is delivered. We monitor this

32



Table of Contents

reserve on a monthly basis by evaluating the historical warranty experience in each market in which we operate, and the reserve is adjusted as appropriate for current quantitative and qualitative factors. Actual future warranty costs could differ from our currently estimated amounts.

Results of Operations

 
Selected Financial and Other Information

      The following table includes selected statement of income and other data (dollars in thousands):

                                           
Three Months Ended
Year Ended December 31, March 31,


2000 2001 2002 2002 2003





Homebuilding:
                                       
Revenues:
                                       
 
Home sales
  $ 540,323     $ 1,374,551     $ 1,349,713     $ 302,155     $ 313,820  
 
Land sales
    6,343       18,361       27,379       383       2,060  
     
     
     
     
     
 
      546,666       1,392,912       1,377,092       302,538       315,880  
Cost of sales:
                                       
 
Home sales
    434,736       1,091,626       1,075,875       239,645       246,280  
 
Land sales
    6,203       16,660       24,430       430       1,814  
     
     
     
     
     
 
      440,939       1,108,286       1,100,305       240,075       248,121  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Gross profit
    105,727       284,626       276,787       62,463       67,759  
Selling, general & administrative expenses
    63,832       152,063       163,726       37,704       43,790  
Depreciation and amortization
    3,112       8,849       5,952       1,631       1,646  
Severance and merger related expenses
          2,643       19,963       13,828        
Loss on early retirement of debt
                5,411              
Other (income) expense, net
    2,264       (3,941 )     (5,838 )     222       (1,019 )
     
     
     
     
     
 
Homebuilding pretax income
    36,519       125,012       87,573       9,522       23,342  
Financial Services:
                                       
 
Revenues
    2,562       32,659       40,214       7,954       10,645  
 
Expenses
    1,635       17,688       20,846       3,780       6,160  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Financial Services pretax income
    927       14,971       19,368       4,174       4,485  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    37,446       139,983       106,941       13,696       27,827  
Income tax expense
    13,672       52,218       39,900       4,767       10,171  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income from continuing operations
  $ 23,774     $ 87,765     $ 67,041     $ 8,929     $ 17,656  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Other Data:
                                       
Cash flow from operating activities
  $ 2,314     $ 24,657     $ 5,701     $ 38,153     $ 1,625  
Cash flow from investing activities
  $ 32,130     $ (6,382 )   $ (60,064 )   $ (1,550 )   $ (74,630 )
Cash flow from financing activities
  $ (18,525 )   $ 30,756     $ (21,885 )   $ (31,248 )   $ 72,873  
EBITDA(1)
  $ 53,551     $ 184,160     $ 142,757     $ 22,264     $ 36,855  
Homes delivered
    1,994       5,304       5,085       1,146       1,234  

33



Table of Contents

                                         
Three Months Ended
Year Ended December 31, March 31,


2000 2001 2002 2002 2003





Average sales price per home delivered
  $ 271     $ 259     $ 265     $ 264     $ 254  
Gross margin on home sales
    19.5 %     20.6 %     20.3 %     20.7 %     21.5 %
Ratio of SG&A expenses to Homebuilding revenues
    11.7 %     10.9 %     11.9 %     12.5 %     13.9 %
Ratio of Homebuilding pre-tax income to Homebuilding revenues
    6.7 %     9.0 %     6.4 %     3.1 %     7.4 %
Backlog at end of period in number of homes
    2,486       2,149       2,280       2,411       2,826  
Backlog at end of period in sales value
  $ 629,348     $ 573,405     $ 636,922     $ 651,273     $ 763,965  
Total active communities at period end
    161       146       159       141       176  


(1)  EBITDA represents earnings from continuing operations before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and consists of the sum of income from continuing operations before: (a) income taxes, (b) amortization of capitalized interest in cost of sales, (c) homebuilding interest expense and (d) depreciation and amortization. We have included information concerning EBITDA because we believe that it is an indication of the profitability of our core operations and reflects the changes in our operating results. We do not use EBITDA as a measure of our liquidity because we do not believe it is a meaningful indication of our cash flow. EBITDA is not required by generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, and other companies may calculate EBITDA differently. EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to operating income or to cash flows from operating activities (as determined in accordance with GAAP) and should not be construed as an indication of our operating performance or a measure of our liquidity. A reconciliation of EBITDA to income from continuing operations, the most directly comparable GAAP performance measure, is provided below (dollars in thousands):

                                         
Three Months Ended
Year Ended December 31, March 31,


2000 2001 2002 2002 2003





Income from continuing operations
  $ 23,774     $ 87,765     $ 67,041     $ 8,929     $ 17,656  
Add: income taxes
    13,672       52,218       39,900       4,767       10,171  
Add: interest in cost of sales
    9,711       34,241       28,133       6,937       7,382  
Add: interest expense
    3,282       1,087       257              
Add: depreciation and amortization expense
    3,112       8,849       7,426       1,631       1,646  
     
     
     
     
     
 
EBITDA
  $ 53,551     $ 184,160     $ 142,757     $ 22,264     $ 36,855  
     
     
     
     
     
 

34



Table of Contents

 
Selected Homebuilding Operating Data

      The following table sets forth home sales and backlog data by region (dollars in thousands):

                                           
Three Months Ended
Year Ended December 31, March 31,


2000 2001 2002 2002 2003





Homes delivered:
                                       
 
Florida
    178       1,931       2,024       489       521  
 
Mid-Atlantic
    280       693       564       133       137  
 
Texas
    1,441       1,623       1,539       304       300  
 
West
    95       1,057       958       220       276  
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Total
    1,994       5,304       5,085       1,146       1,234  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Average sales price per home delivered:
                                       
 
Florida
  $ 215     $ 227     $ 245     $ 240     $ 233  
 
Mid-Atlantic
  $ 259     $ 308     $ 351     $ 333     $ 289  
 
Texas
  $ 273     $ 267     $ 258     $ 269     $ 260  
 
West
  $ 259     $ 274     $ 269     $ 266     $ 270  
 
Company average
  $ 271     $ 259     $ 265     $ 264     $ 254  
Revenues from home sales:
                                       
 
Florida
  $ 38,216     $ 437,784     $ 496,731     $ 117,581     $ 121,574  
 
Mid-Atlantic
    83,671       213,571       197,773       44,351       39,653  
 
Texas
    393,873       433,389       397,129       81,720       77,941  
 
West
    24,563       289,807       258,080       58,503       74,652  
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Total
  $ 540,323     $ 1,374,551     $ 1,349,713     $ 302,155     $ 313,820  
     
     
     
     
     
 
New sales contracts, net of cancellations:
                                       
 
Florida
    154       1,987       1,809       473       642  
 
Mid-Atlantic
    205       524       569       192       195  
 
Texas
    1,362       1,511       1,515       440       418  
 
West
    98       945       1,116       303       377  
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Total
    1,819       4,967       5,009       1,408       1,632  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Backlog at end of period, in number of homes:
                                       
 
Florida
    1,217       1,273       1,195       1,257       1,316  
 
Mid-Atlantic
    338       169       244       228       302  
 
Texas
    514       402       378       538       496  
 
West
    417       305       463       388       712  
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Total
    2,486       2,149       2,280       2,411       2,826  
     
     
     
     
     
 

35



Table of Contents

                                           
Three Months Ended
Year Ended December 31, March 31,


2000 2001 2002 2002 2003





Backlog at end of period in sales value:
                                       
 
Florida
  $ 286,100     $ 326,026     $ 314,253     $ 328,097     $ 339,139  
 
Mid-Atlantic
    95,831       59,991       89,684       84,326       107,778  
 
Texas
    135,517       105,283       103,017       135,704       128,524  
 
West
    111,900       82,105       129,968       103,146       188,524  
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Total
  $ 629,348     $ 573,405     $ 636,922     $ 651,273     $ 763,965  
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2003 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2002

      Income from continuing operations increased to $17.7 million (or $0.63 per share) during the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $8.9 million (or $0.32 per share) during the three months ended March 31, 2002. The increase in income from continuing operations is attributable to an increase in Homebuilding pretax income to $23.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $9.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2002. Additionally, we experienced an increase in Financial Services pretax income to $4.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $4.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2002.

      Total revenues increased to $326.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $310.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2002. The increase of 5% is attributable to an increase in Homebuilding revenues and an increase in Financial Services revenues of 4% and 33%, respectively.

      Our effective tax rate increased to 36.6% during the three months ended March 31, 2003 from 34.8% during the three months ended March 31, 2002. The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2002 reflected a non-recurring state income tax benefit resulting from certain severance charges recorded during this period. For the year ended December 31, 2002, our effective tax rate was 37.3%.

 
Homebuilding

      Homebuilding revenues increased to $315.9 million during the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $302.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2002. The increase of 4% was due to an increase in home deliveries to 1,234 during the three months ended March 31, 2003 from 1,146 during the three months ended March 31, 2002. The 8% increase in home deliveries was partially offset by a decline in the average selling price on delivered homes to $254,000 from $264,000.

      Our Florida region realized an increase in revenue from home sales of $4.0 million to $121.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2003. This increase of 3% is due to an increase of 32 home deliveries during the three months ended March 31, 2003 from the three months ended March 31, 2002. The increase in home deliveries was primarily due to the deliveries generated by our Jacksonville division, which we acquired during the fourth quarter of 2002. This increase in home deliveries was partially offset by a decline in the average selling price for the Florida region to $233,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $240,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2002. The decrease in average selling price is primarily due to a change in product mix, including the additional deliveries generated by our Jacksonville division, which offers homes with a lower average selling price.

      Our Mid-Atlantic region realized a decline in revenue from home sales of $4.7 million to $39.7 million. This decrease of 11% was due to a reduction in the average selling price to $289,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $333,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2002 primarily due to a change in product mix for the region, as we experienced significantly less closings in our Virginia division, and an increase in our recently acquired Baltimore division, which has historically had a

36



Table of Contents

lower average selling price. Home deliveries remained relatively flat in our Mid-Atlantic region, increasing slightly to 137 during the three months ended March 31, 2003 from 133 during the three months ended March 31, 2002.

      Our Texas region realized a decline in revenue from home sales of $3.8 million to $77.9 million during the three months ended March 31, 2003. This decrease of 5% was primarily attributable to a reduction in the average selling price to $260,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $269,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2002 due to our focus on diversifying our product mix. Home deliveries remained relatively flat in our Texas region, decreasing slightly to 300 during the three months ended March 31, 2003 from 304 during the three months ended March 31, 2002.

      Our West region realized an increase in revenue from home sales of $16.2 million to $74.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. This increase of 28% was primarily due to an increase of 56 home deliveries during the three months ended March 31, 2003 from the three months ended March 31, 2002. The increase in home deliveries was primarily due to the deliveries generated by our acquisitions of Trophy Homes and The James Construction Company during the three months ended March 31, 2003. Additionally, our West region experienced a slight increase in its average selling price to $270,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $266,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2002.

      Our Homebuilding gross profit increased to $67.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $62.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002. This increase of 8% is primarily due to an increase in revenue from home sales and an increase in our gross margin on homes sales. Our gross margin on home sales increased slightly to 21.5% during the three months ended March 31, 2003 from 20.7% during the three months ended March 31, 2002. This increase is primarily due to a change in product mix in our existing divisions and the higher gross margins generated by our recently acquired divisions, which have all generated gross margins in excess of 21%.

      SG&A expenses increased to $43.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $37.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2002. As a percentage of Homebuilding revenues, SG&A increased to 13.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2003 from 12.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2002. Of this $6.1 million increase in SG&A expenses, approximately $4.5 million is attributable to SG&A expenses associated with recently acquired companies. The remainder of the increase is primarily attributable to increases in compensation, professional fees and insurance. During the three months ended March 31, 2003, we incurred significant professional and other fees as a result of modifying our corporate structure to be more efficient from an organizational, operational and income tax standpoint. We expect that certain of these expenditures will continue through the third quarter of 2003. The benefits from these expenditures will be realized through lower income taxes and other operating costs over time.

      Severance expenses of $13.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2002 represent accrued severance charges relating to former executives of Engle who resigned during February 2002.

 
Financial Services

      Financial Services revenues increased to $10.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $8.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2002. The increase of 33% is primarily attributable to an increase in the number of closings by our mortgage and title operations. The number of closings at our mortgage operations increased to 880 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 from 817 for the three months ended March 31, 2002. The number of closings at our title operations increased to 4,670 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 from 3,871 for the three months ended March 31, 2002. The capture ratios of our Financial Services segment have remained relatively consistent with the corresponding quarter in the prior year. Our mortgage operations capture ratio remained consistent at 53% for the three months ended March 31, 2003 from the three months ended March 31, 2002. However, excluding our four recently-acquired companies where our mortgage operations have not yet penetrated into the marketplace, our capture ratio increased by 9% over the prior year.

37



Table of Contents

 
EBITDA

      During the three months ended March 31, 2003 we generated EBITDA of $36.9 million as compared to $22.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2002. The increase in EBITDA is primarily a result of $13.8 million in severance expenses incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2002. Excluding these unusual charges, EBITDA during the three months ended March 31, 2002 would have been $36.1 million. The increase of 2% primarily relates to the increase in our Financial Services pretax income during the three months ended March 31, 2003 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2002.

 
Fiscal Year 2002 Compared to Fiscal Year 2001

      Net income decreased to $72.0 million (or $2.58 per share) during Fiscal Year 2002 from $94.0 million (or $3.37 per share) during Fiscal Year 2001. Income from continuing operations decreased to $67.0 million (or $2.40 per share) during Fiscal Year 2002 from $87.8 million (or $3.15 per share) during Fiscal Year 2001. The decrease in income from continuing operations is attributable to a decrease in Homebuilding pretax income to $87.6 million during Fiscal Year 2002 from $125.0 million during Fiscal Year 2001. The decrease in Homebuilding pretax income was partially offset by an increase in Financial Services pretax income to $19.4 million during Fiscal Year 2002 from $15.0 million during Fiscal Year 2001.

      Total revenues decreased to $1.42 billion during Fiscal Year 2002 from $1.43 billion during Fiscal Year 2001. The decrease of 1% is attributable to a decline in Homebuilding revenues which was offset by an increase in Financial Services revenues.

      Our provision for income taxes remained consistent at 37.3% during Fiscal Year 2002 from Fiscal Year 2001.

 
Homebuilding

      Homebuilding revenues decreased to $1.38 billion during Fiscal Year 2002 from $1.39 billion during Fiscal Year 2001. The decrease of 1% was due to a decline in revenues from home sales, to $1.35 billion in Fiscal Year 2002 from $1.37 billion during Fiscal Year 2001, which was offset by an increase in revenues from land sales, to $27.4 million from $18.4 million during the same periods. Home deliveries decreased to 5,085 during Fiscal Year 2002 from 5,304 during Fiscal Year 2001.

      The decrease in home deliveries and revenue from home sales was primarily attributable to a decline in the number of communities in which we were actively marketing during Fiscal Year 2002 as compared to Fiscal Year 2001 and a weakening in housing demand in the Texas and West regions. These factors were partially offset by a strong housing demand in Florida.

      At the beginning of Fiscal Year 2002, we were actively marketing in 146 communities. As a result of our prior strategic decision to consolidate our home sales activities and reduce our homesite acquisitions during Fiscal Year 2001 and throughout the first half of Fiscal Year 2002, our active communities declined to a low of 132 in June 2002. In the second half of Fiscal Year 2002, we began to increase the number of communities in which we were marketing, both through organic growth and through acquisition. Consequently, at December 31, 2002 we were actively marketing in 159 communities. However, due to a lag time between the date we begin marketing homes in a community and the date that we begin to deliver homes, home deliveries from these new communities will not begin to contribute to our home sales revenue until the end of 2003.

      During Fiscal Year 2002, our Texas region generated revenues from home sales of $397.1 million on 1,539 home deliveries as compared to revenues of $433.4 million on home deliveries of 1,623 during Fiscal Year 2001. The weakening in demand in this market also caused an increase in the level of incentives offered which is reflected in the decline in the average sales price per home delivered to $258,000 during Fiscal Year 2002 from $267,000 during Fiscal Year 2001. Additionally, our West region experienced a decline in revenues from home sales to $258.1 million on 958 home deliveries during Fiscal Year 2002

38



Table of Contents

from $289.8 million on 1,057 home deliveries during Fiscal Year 2001. The decline in revenues in the West region is primarily due to a decline in the average number of active selling communities during the first part of Fiscal Year 2002, as compared to the prior year, and a continued weakness in demand in our Colorado markets. This softness in the market caused us to increase incentives offered to homebuyers resulting in a slight decrease in the average sales price per home delivered to $269,000 in Fiscal Year 2002 from $274,000 in Fiscal Year 2001.

      These declines in revenue from the Texas and West regions were partially offset by an increase in revenues generated in our Florida region to $496.7 million on 2,024 home deliveries during Fiscal Year 2002 from $437.8 million on 1,931 home deliveries during Fiscal Year 2001. The revenue increase in this region is primarily due to the increase in our average sales price per home delivered to $245,000 during Fiscal Year 2002 from $227,000 during Fiscal Year 2001. Additionally, we generated revenue from home sales of $13.7 million as a result of our acquisition of D.S. Ware Homes during October 2002.

      Our average sales price per home delivered increased 2% to $265,000 during Fiscal Year 2002 as compared to $259,000 during Fiscal Year 2001. The increase is primarily attributable to increases in our Florida and Mid-Atlantic regions, where we have continued to realize higher average sales prices from steady demand for product. The increase in average sales price in these regions were partially offset by declines in our Texas and West regions, where during Fiscal Year 2002 we experienced significant increases in incentives provided to homebuyers as compared to Fiscal Year 2001.

      Homebuilding cost of sales decreased to $1.10 billion during Fiscal Year 2002 from $1.11 billion during Fiscal Year 2001. The decline of 1% is attributable to the decline in the number of home deliveries offset by an increase in cost of land/homesite sales. Our gross margin on home sales decreased to 20.3% during Fiscal Year 2002 as compared to 20.6% during Fiscal Year 2001. The decline in gross margin is primarily attributable to increased incentives and an increase in the average homesite cost per closing, partially offset by an increase in our gross margin on options and upgrades.

      SG&A expenses increased by 8% to $163.7 million during Fiscal Year 2002 from $152.1 million for Fiscal Year 2001. As a percentage of Homebuilding revenues, SG&A expenses increased to 11.9% for Fiscal Year 2002 from 10.9% for Fiscal Year 2001. The increase in SG&A expenses is primarily attributable to increases in compensation, information technology, insurance and professional fees.

      Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased to $6.0 million during Fiscal Year 2002 from $8.8 million during Fiscal Year 2001. The decrease of $2.8 million is primarily due to the elimination of goodwill amortization as a result of the adoption of SFAS 142 effective January 1, 2002. If we had not recorded goodwill amortization expense during Fiscal Year 2001, it would have resulted in an increase in net income per common share for Fiscal Year 2001 of $0.05.

      During Fiscal Year 2002, we incurred $20.0 million in severance and merger related charges as compared to $2.6 million in Fiscal Year 2001. These charges include severance accrued related to the termination of executives who were employed by either us or Engle Homes prior to the merger. Also, in connection with our merger with Engle Homes, we incurred approximately $6.0 million in legal, consulting and advisory fees.

      During Fiscal Year 2002, in connection with our offering of the June 2002 Senior Notes and the June 2002 Senior Subordinated Notes, we recognized a loss on the early retirement of debt of $5.4 million. This charge relates to the exit fees incurred and the write off of unamortized deferred finance costs associated with the then existing borrowings.

 
Financial Services

      Financial Services revenues increased to $40.2 million during Fiscal Year 2002 from $32.7 million during Fiscal Year 2001. The increase of 23% is primarily attributable to an increase in the mortgage and title operations capture of our home sale deliveries. The increase in the capture ratio of our mortgage operations is due primarily to the expansion into the Texas region.

39



Table of Contents

      Financial Services expenses increased to $20.8 million during Fiscal Year 2002 from $17.7 million during Fiscal Year 2001. The increase of 18% is primarily attributable to increased expenses incurred in connection with our expansion of the Financial Services operations.

 
Discontinued Operations

      During March 2002, we committed to a plan to dispose of Westbrooke to eliminate operating redundancies in our South Florida markets and to strengthen our financial position. Pursuant to this plan of disposition, we would sell 100% of the common stock of Westbrooke. On April 8, 2002, we signed a definitive agreement for the sale of Westbrooke to Standard Pacific Corp. (Standard Pacific) for $41.0 million in cash. This sale was completed on April 15, 2002. In addition, Standard Pacific satisfied $54.4 million of Westbrooke’s debt that included $14.2 million of intercompany liabilities owed to us. Upon completion of this sale, we realized a gain of $4.3 million. We have determined that in accordance with SFAS 144, as of March 31, 2002, the criteria to classify the Westbrooke assets as held for sale were met.

      Results of Westbrooke’s operations have been classified as discontinued operations, and prior periods have been restated. Selected financial data of our discontinued operations are as follows (dollars in thousands):

                         
Year Ended December 31,

2000 2001 2002



Revenues
  $ 178,213     $ 205,661     $ 44,197  
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes
  $ 6,321     $ 6,272     $ 4,963  
Net income per common share from discontinued operations
  $ 0.48     $ 0.22     $ 0.18  
 
EBITDA

      During Fiscal Year 2002 we generated EBITDA of $142.8 million as compared to $184.2 million during Fiscal Year 2001. The decline in EBITDA is primarily a result of $20.0 million in severance and merger related charges incurred during Fiscal Year 2002 as compared to $2.6 million incurred during Fiscal Year 2001 and a $5.4 million loss on the early retirement of debt associated with our refinancing. Excluding these unusual charges, EBITDA during Fiscal Year 2002 would have been $168.2 million as compared to $186.8 million during Fiscal Year 2001. The decline of 10% primarily relates to the decline in our Homebuilding pretax income, after excluding these unusual charges, during Fiscal Year 2002 as compared to Fiscal Year 2001. The decline in our Homebuilding pretax income during Fiscal Year 2002 was partially offset by an increase in our Financial Services pretax income.

 
Fiscal Year 2001 Compared to Fiscal Year 2000

      Net income increased to $94.0 million (or $3.37 per share) during Fiscal Year 2001 from $30.1 million (or $2.27 per share) during Fiscal Year 2000. Income from continuing operations increased to $87.8 million (or $3.15 per share) during Fiscal Year 2001 from $23.8 million (or $1.79 per share) during Fiscal Year 2000. The increase in income from continuing operations is attributable to significant increases in our Homebuilding pretax income to $125.0 million during Fiscal Year 2001 from $36.5 million during Fiscal Year 2000 and an increase in Financial Services pretax income to $15.0 million during Fiscal Year 2001 from $0.9 million during Fiscal Year 2000.

      Total revenues increased to $1.4 billion during Fiscal Year 2001 from $0.6 billion during Fiscal Year 2000. The increases in income and revenues were primarily a result of the inclusion of a full year of Engle Homes’ results of operations during Fiscal Year 2001 as compared to approximately 40 days during Fiscal Year 2000. As a result of our merger with Engle Homes, which is being accounted for as a reorganization of entities under common control, Engle Homes’ results of operations are included from November 22, 2000, the earliest date that both we and Engle Homes were under common control.

40



Table of Contents

      Our provision for income taxes increased to 37.3% during Fiscal Year 2001 from 36.5% during Fiscal Year 2000. This increase in our effective rate was primarily a result of an increase in state taxes, due to a higher proportion of our pretax income being generated from states which are subject to state income tax.

 
Homebuilding

      Homebuilding revenues increased to $1.39 billion during Fiscal Year 2001 from $0.55 billion during Fiscal Year 2000 primarily as a result of the inclusion of a full year of Engle Homes operations. This increase of 153% was due to an increase in revenues from home sales, to $1.37 billion in Fiscal Year 2001 from $0.54 billion in Fiscal Year 2000, and an increase in revenues from homesite/land sales, to $18.3 million during Fiscal Year 2001 from $6.3 million in Fiscal Year 2000. Home deliveries increased to 5,304 during Fiscal Year 2001 from 1,994 during Fiscal Year 2000.

      This increase in revenues from home sales is primarily attributable to the increase in the number of home deliveries which was slightly offset by a decrease in our average sale price per home delivered. The average sales price per home delivered for Fiscal Year 2001 decreased to $259,000 from $271,000 during Fiscal Year 2000. The decrease was primarily attributable to the change in the mix of deliveries between our regions. During Fiscal Year 2000, 72.2% of our deliveries occurred in Texas, which realized an average sales price per home delivered of $273,000, while only 8.9% of the deliveries occurred in Florida, which realized an average sales price per home delivered of $215,000. During Fiscal Year 2001, deliveries in Texas, which had an average sales price per home delivered of $267,000, decreased to 30.6%, while deliveries in Florida, which had an average sales price per home delivered of $227,000, increased to 36.4%. This was partially offset by the increase in our deliveries occurring in the West region. During Fiscal Year 2000, we generated 4.8% of our deliveries in the West, which realized an average sales price per home delivered of $259,000. During Fiscal Year 2001, deliveries in the West increased to 19.9%, with an average selling price per home delivered of $274,000.

      As a result of the inclusion of a full year of Engle Homes operations, Homebuilding cost of sales increased to $1.11 billion during Fiscal Year 2001 from $0.44 billion during Fiscal Year 2000. During Fiscal Year 2001 the cost of home sales was $1.09 billion as compared to $0.43 billion during Fiscal Year 2000. Our gross margin on home sales increased to 20.6% during Fiscal Year 2001 from 19.5% during Fiscal Year 2000. This increase in gross margin is primarily due to the shift in the product mix of homes closed to higher margin homes.

      SG&A expenses increased to $152.1 million during Fiscal Year 2001 from $63.8 million for Fiscal Year 2000. This increase of 138% is primarily due to the inclusion of a full year of Engle Homes operations. As a percentage of Homebuilding revenues, SG&A expenses remained relatively consistent, decreasing to 10.9% for Fiscal Year 2001 from 11.7% for Fiscal Year 2000.

      During Fiscal Year 2001 depreciation and amortization expense was $8.8 million as compared to $3.1 million during Fiscal Year 2000. Of these amounts, amortization of goodwill was $2.4 million in Fiscal Year 2001 and $1.6 million in Fiscal Year 2000. As a result of the adoption of SFAS 142 effective January 1, 2002, we ceased amortization of goodwill. The elimination of this amortization expense would have resulted in an increase in net income per common share of $0.05 during Fiscal Year 2001 and $0.08 during Fiscal Year 2000.

      During Fiscal Year 2001, we incurred $2.6 million in severance and merger related expenses. These expenses relate primarily to legal, consulting and related costs incurred in connection with the merger with Engle Homes.

 
Financial Services

      As a result of the inclusion of a full year of Engle Homes operations, Financial Services revenues increased to $32.7 million during Fiscal Year 2001 from $2.6 million during Fiscal Year 2000. Financial Services expenses increased to $17.7 million from $1.6 million.

41



Table of Contents

 
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Statement of Financial Condition and Related Data

      The following table includes selected statement of financial condition and related data (dollars in thousands):

                                 
As of December 31,

As of March 31,
2000 2001 2002 2003




Cash — unrestricted
  $ 24,251     $ 75,136     $ 49,211     $ 49,079  
Inventory
  $ 613,095     $ 645,986     $ 753,872     $ 853,841  
Total assets
  $ 868,553     $ 999,170     $ 1,034,888     $ 1,148,923  
Homebuilding borrowings
  $ 337,649     $ 308,697     $ 413,110     $ 505,642  
Total borrowings(1)
  $ 346,720     $ 347,386     $ 461,419     $ 540,246  
Stockholders’ equity
  $ 355,059     $ 413,370     $ 405,145     $ 422,961  
Ratio of Homebuilding borrowings to total assets
    38.9 %     30.9 %     39.9 %     44.0 %
Ratio of Homebuilding borrowings to Capital(2)
    48.7 %     42.8 %     50.5 %     54.5 %


(1)  Total borrowings includes Homebuilding borrowings and Financial Services borrowings.
 
(2)  Capital includes Homebuilding borrowings and stockholders’ equity. Capital excludes Financial Services borrowings.

 
Discussion of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

      Our Homebuilding operations’ primary uses of cash have been for land acquisitions, construction and development expenditures and SG&A expenditures. Our sources of cash to finance these requirements have been primarily cash generated from operations and cash borrowed under our credit facilities. Our Financial Services segment relies primarily on internally generated funds, which include the proceeds generated from the sale of mortgages, and on the mortgage operation’s warehouse line of credit to fund our operations.

      At March 31, 2003, we had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $49.1 million as compared to $49.2 million at December 31, 2002.

      During the three months ended March 31, 2003, we generated cash of $1.6 million from our operating activities, as compared to $38.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002. This decrease is primarily a result of an increase in inventory of $44.6 million, excluding the impact of our acquisitions, as compared to a $0.9 million increase in inventory for the three months ended March 31, 2002. This increase in inventory is part of our strategy to increase the number of active communities and our land positions. During the three months ended March 31, 2003, including the impact of our acquisitions, our controlled homesites increased to 31,651 from 26,320.

      Cash used in investing activities was $74.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2003 as compared to $1.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2002. The increase in the use of cash in investing activities is primarily due to the acquisitions during the three months ended March 31, 2003.

      On February 28, 2003, we acquired the net assets of The James Construction Company, a homebuilder operating in the greater Denver, Colorado area, for approximately $22.0 million in cash. In addition, we are obligated to pay an additional $1.4 million over a two year period.

      On February 6, 2003, we acquired the net assets of Trophy Homes, Inc., a homebuilder operating in Las Vegas, Nevada, and certain homesites for approximately $36.2 million in cash. In addition, if certain targets are met regarding home deliveries during 2003 and 2004, we will be obligated to pay up to $2.5 million over a two year period.

42



Table of Contents

      As a result of the increases in our land positions and the recent acquisitions, our ratio of Homebuilding borrowings to total assets was 44.0% at March 31, 2003 as compared to 39.9% at December 31, 2002. Our ratio of Homebuilding borrowings to capital was 54.5% at March 31, 2003 as compared to 50.5% at December 31, 2002.

      On February 3, 2003, we issued $100.0 million of 9% Senior Notes at a price of 94.836% of the principal amount plus interest accrued since January 1, 2003. The net proceeds of approximately $93.6 million were primarily used to repay amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility. The February 2003 Senior Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture with the same terms and conditions as the June 2002 Senior Notes.

      On April 22, 2003, we issued an additional $35.0 million of our 10 3/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012 at a price of 98.5%. The net proceeds of approximately $34.5 million were used to repay the amounts outstanding under our credit facility. These additional debt securities were issued under the same indenture pursuant to which our June 2002 Senior Subordinated Notes were issued.

      Interest on our outstanding senior notes and senior subordinated notes is payable on January 1 and July 1 of each year. The senior notes are guaranteed by all of our material domestic subsidiaries. The senior notes rank pari passu in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured senior debt and senior in right of payment to the senior subordinated notes and any future subordinated debt. The senior subordinated notes rank pari passu in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured subordinated debt and are guaranteed on a senior subordinated basis by all of our material domestic subsidiaries. The indentures governing the senior and senior subordinated notes require us to maintain a minimum net worth and place certain restrictions on our ability, among other things, to incur additional debt, pay or make dividends or other distributions, sell assets, enter into transactions with affiliates and merge or consolidate with other entities. The interest rates on our outstanding senior and senior subordinated notes are higher than the collective interest rates on the obligations that were repaid. As a result of the higher interest rates and the assumption of approximately $75 million of Technical Olympic’s debt in connection with the merger with Engle Holdings, we anticipate that interest incurred will exceed the amounts which would have been incurred under the prior borrowings. Therefore, the increased interest incurred will have an effect on gross margins in future periods.

      As of March 31, 2003, our revolving credit facility, as amended, permitted us to borrow up to the lesser of (i) $220.0 million or (ii) our borrowing base (calculated in accordance with the revolving credit facility agreement) minus our outstanding senior debt. The revolving credit facility expires on June 26, 2005. As of March 31, 2003, we had drawn down $50.0 million and had issued letters of credit of $36.5 million and as a result, had $133.5 million in availability under the revolving credit facility. Loans outstanding under the facility may be base rate loans or Eurodollar loans, at our election. Base rate loans accrue interest at a rate per annum equal to (i) an applicable margin plus (ii) the higher of (A) Citibank, N.A.’s base rate, (B) 0.5% plus the three week average of reserve-adjusted three-month certificate of deposit rate and (C) 0.5% plus the Federal Funds Rate. Eurodollar loans accrue interest at a rate per annum equal to (i) an applicable margin plus (ii) the reserve-adjusted Eurodollar rate for the interest period. Applicable margins will be adjusted based on the ratio of our liabilities to our tangible worth. At March 31, 2003, our loans outstanding under the revolving credit facility accrued interest at a rate of 3.55% per annum. The revolving credit facility requires us to (1) maintain specified financial ratios regarding leverage, interest coverage, consolidated tangible net worth and certain operational measurements and (2) satisfy certain financial condition tests. The revolving credit facility also places certain restrictions on, among other things, our ability to incur additional debt or liens, pay or make dividends or other distributions, sell assets, enter into transactions with affiliates and merge or consolidate with other entities. The revolving credit facility is secured by a first-priority perfected lien on all capital stock of subsidiaries owned by us. Our obligations under the revolving credit facility are guaranteed by all our domestic subsidiaries (subject to certain limited restrictions).

      On April 4, 2003, we amended our revolving credit facility to increase the amount we are permitted to borrow to the lesser of (i) $305.0 million or (ii) our borrowing base (calculated in accordance with the

43



Table of Contents

revolving credit facility agreement) minus our outstanding senior debt, and to increase the amount of the letter of credit subfacility to $80.0 million. Subsequently, we increased the size of the facility to provide up to an additional $10.0 million of revolving loans. In addition, we have the right to increase the size of the facility to provide for up to an additional $10.0 million of revolving loans, subject to meeting certain requirements.

      To fund the origination of residential mortgage loans, our subsidiary, Preferred Home Mortgage Company, entered into a $65.0 million revolving warehouse line of credit, which we refer to as our warehouse line of credit. The warehouse line of credit is comprised of (1) a credit facility providing for revolving loans of up to $40.0 million, subject to meeting borrowing base requirements based on the value of collateral provided and (2) mortgage loan purchase and sale agreements which provide for the purchase by the lender of up to $25.0 million in mortgage loans generated by Preferred Home. At no time may the amount outstanding under the facility plus the amount of purchased loans pursuant to the purchase and sale agreements exceed $65.0 million. The warehouse line of credit expires on September 22, 2003. As of March 31, 2003, we had $34.6 million outstanding under the warehouse line of credit. The warehouse line of credit bears interest, at Preferred Home’s option, at either, (1) the Federal Funds rate plus 1.375% or (2) a Eurodollar rate plus 1.25%. At March 31, 2003, our loans outstanding under the warehouse line of credit accrued interest at a rate of 2.625% per annum. The warehouse line of credit requires Preferred Home to maintain certain financial ratios and minimums. The warehouse line of credit is guaranteed by us and secured by funded mortgages which are pledged as collateral.

      We believe that as a result of our offering of senior notes in February 2003 and senior subordinated notes in April 2003 and the increase in our revolving credit facility, we will have adequate financial resources, including cash from operations and availability under the revolving credit facility and the warehouse line of credit, to meet our current and anticipated working capital and land acquisition and development needs based on current market conditions. However, there can be no assurance that the amounts available from such sources will be sufficient. If we identify new acquisition opportunities, or if our operations do not generate sufficient cash from operations at levels currently anticipated, we may need to seek additional debt or equity financing to operate and expand our business.

      At March 31, 2003, the amount of our annual debt service payments was $45.8 million. This amount included debt service payments on the senior and senior subordinated notes of $42.6 million and interest payments on the revolving credit facility, the warehouse line of credit and other notes of $3.2 million based on the balances outstanding as of March 31, 2003. The amount of our annual debt service payments on the revolving credit facility fluctuates based on the principal outstanding under the facility and the interest rate. An increase or decrease of 1% in interest rates will change our annual debt service payments by $1.0 million per year. The revolving credit facility terminates in June 2005 at which time we will be required to repay all outstanding principal. Under certain circumstances, we may extend the facility in one-year increments, for up to two additional years.

Backlog

      As of March 31, 2003, we had 2,826 units in backlog representing $764.0 million in revenue, as compared to 2,411 units in backlog representing $651.3 million in revenue as of March 31, 2002. This increase in revenue in backlog of 17% is primarily attributable to the units in backlog of our recent acquisitions. Our average selling price of units in backlog has remained consistent at $270,000.

Dividends

      We did not declare or pay any dividends during Fiscal Year 2002. We paid a dividend of $0.54 per share of common stock (on a pre-restatement basis and $0.22 per share on a restated basis) in Fiscal Year 2001 ($6.2 million in the aggregate). We did not pay any cash dividends on our common stock in Fiscal Year 2000. Prior to its merger with us, Engle Homes made net distributions of $4.8 million during Fiscal Year 2002, $29.5 million during Fiscal Year 2001 and $0.4 million during Fiscal Year 2000.

44



Table of Contents

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

      In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 145, “Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt”, which rescinded SFAS No. 4, No. 44, and No. 64 and amended SFAS No. 13. The new standard addresses the income statement classification of gains or losses from the extinguishment of debt and criteria for classification as extraordinary items. We adopted SFAS No. 145 during 2002.

      In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (“FIN 45”). FIN 45 elaborates on the existing disclosure requirements for most guarantees, including loan guarantees such as standby letters of credit. It also clarifies that at the time a company issues a guarantee, the company must recognize an initial liability for the fair value, or market value, of the obligations it assumes under the guarantee and must disclose that information in its interim and annual financial statements. The provisions related to recognizing a liability at inception of the guarantee for the fair value of the guarantor’s obligations do not apply to product warranties. The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions apply on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The adoption of the initial recognition and initial measurement provisions of FIN 45 did not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

      In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure”, which amends SFAS No. 123. The new standard provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. It also requires prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the affect of the method used on reported results. We have not elected to change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. We adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148 in our first fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2003.

      In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” an interpretation of ARB No. 51 (“FIN 46”). A Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) is created when (i) the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties or (ii) equity holders either (a) lack direct or indirect ability to make decisions about the entity, (b) are not obligated to absorb expected losses of the entity or (c) do not have the right to receive expected residual returns of the entity if they occur. If an entity is deemed to be a VIE, pursuant to FIN 46, an enterprise that absorbs a majority of the expected losses of the VIE is considered the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the VIE. FIN 46 is effective immediately for VIE’s created after January 31, 2003. For VIE’s created before January 31, 2003, FIN 46 must be applied at the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2003.

      In certain situation, we have and will enter into option contracts to acquire homesites at a fixed purchase price. As a result, depending on the structure of the counterparty, these contracts may qualify as variable interests pursuant to FIN 46. If we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE we will consolidate it on our statement of financial condition. The maximum exposure to loss is limited to the deposits or letters of credits placed with these entities. Creditors, if any, of these VIE’s have no recourse against our Company. As of March 31, 2003, the adoption of FIN 46 has not had a significant impact on our financial statements. Management is currently evaluating the impact of FIN 46 on transactions entered into prior to January 31, 2003. Management does not believe that the adoption of FIN 46 will have an adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.

Seasonality of Operations

      The homebuilding industry tends to be seasonal, as generally there are more homes sold in the spring and summer months when the weather is milder, although the rate of sales contracts for new homes is highly dependent on the number of active communities and the timing of new community openings. We

45



Table of Contents

operate primarily in the southwest and southeast, where weather conditions are more suitable to a year-round construction process than in other parts of the country. Because new home deliveries trail new home contracts by several months, we typically have a greater percentage of home deliveries in the fall.

Inflation

      We may be adversely affected during periods of high inflation, primarily because of higher land and construction costs. In addition, inflation may result in higher mortgage interest rates, which may significantly affect the affordability of permanent mortgage financing for prospective purchasers. Inflation also increases our interest costs. We attempt to pass through to our customers any increases in our costs through increased selling prices and, to date, inflation has not had a material adverse effect on our results of operations. However, there is no assurance that inflation will not have a material adverse impact on our future results of operations.

Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

      As a result of our notes offerings, at March 31, 2003, $450.0 million of our outstanding borrowings are based on fixed interest rates. We are exposed to market risk primarily related to potential adverse changes in interest rates on our existing construction loans, warehouse line of credit and revolving credit facility. The interest rates relative to these borrowings fluctuate with the prime and LIBOR lending rates, both upwards and downwards. We have not entered into derivative financial instruments. As of March 31, 2003, we had an aggregate of approximately $95.1 million drawn under our bank loan arrangements that are subject to changes in interest rates. An increase or decrease of 1% in interest rates will change our annual debt service payments by $1.0 million per year as a result of such bank loan arrangements.

      We have not entered into, or intend to enter into, derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

      The following table presents the future principal payment obligations and weighted average interest rates associated with our long-term debt instruments assuming our actual level of long-term debt indebtedness as of March 31, 2003:

                                                           
Expected Maturity Date

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Thereafter Fair Value







(Dollars in thousands)
Liabilities
                                                       
Long-term debt
                                         
 
Fixed rate (9.0%)
                                $ 300,000     $ 295,875  
 
Fixed rate (10 3/8%)
                                $ 150,000     $ 146,438