SEC Info℠

Home

Search

My Interests

Help

Sign In

Please Sign In

Peets Coffee & Tea Inc – ‘10-K’ for 1/1/06

On:  Thursday, 3/16/06, at 4:22pm ET   ·   For:  1/1/06   ·   Accession #:  1193125-6-56737   ·   File #:  0-32233

Previous ‘10-K’:  ‘10-K’ on 3/18/05 for 1/2/05   ·   Next:  ‘10-K’ on 4/2/07 for 12/31/06   ·   Latest:  ‘10-K’ on 3/9/12 for 1/1/12

in

this entire Filing. an “Entity” Search.

Show

Documents searched

and

each “hit”. the 1st “hit”.

↓↑Hints

 Text Wildcards:  ? (any letter/digit),  * (many).  Search Logic:  for Documents:  & (and),  | (or);  for Text:  | (anywhere),  "(&)" (near).  Details... 

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size              Issuer               Agent

 3/16/06  Peets Coffee & Tea Inc            10-K        1/01/06    7:874K                                   RR Donnelley/FA

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: 10-K        Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended January 1,      HTML    646K 
                          2006                                                   
 2: EX-10.17    Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Property         HTML    113K 
 3: EX-23.1     Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP                    HTML      6K 
 4: EX-31.1     Certification of the Company's Chief Executive      HTML     15K 
                          Officer, Patrick O'Dea                                 
 5: EX-31.2     Certification of the Company's Chief Financial      HTML     15K 
                          Officer, Thomas Cawley                                 
 6: EX-32.1     Certification of the Company's Chief Executive      HTML      7K 
                          Officer, Patrick O'Dea                                 
 7: EX-32.2     Certification of the Company's Chief Financial      HTML      7K 
                          Officer, Thomas Cawley                                 

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

OR

Commission file number 0-32233

PEET’S COFFEE & TEA, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

1400 Park Avenue

Emeryville, California 94608-3520

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)

(510) 594-2100

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, no par value

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is well-known, seasoned filer (as defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

Large Accelerated Filer  ¨        Accelerated Filer  x        Non-Accelerated Filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes  ¨    No  x

The approximate aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant based on the closing price and shares of the Common Stock outstanding on July 3, 2005 (the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter) and February 24, 2006, as reported by the Nasdaq National Market, was $472,404,296 and $421,454,810, respectively. Shares of Common Stock held by each officer, director and each person known to the Company to hold 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock have been excluded as such persons may be deemed to be affiliates of the Company. Such determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

As of February 24, 2006, 13,923,185 shares of registrant’s Common Stock were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the proxy statement related to the registrant’s 2006 annual meeting of shareholders, which proxy statement will be filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 within 120 days of the end of the registrant’s fiscal year ended January 1, 2006, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Some of the matters discussed under the captions “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation,” “Business” and elsewhere in this report include forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and assumptions about future events, including, among other things:

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “future,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate” and similar expressions (or the negative of such expressions). These statements are based on our current beliefs, expectations and assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual results, levels of activity, performance, achievements and events may vary significantly from those implied by the forward-looking statements. A description of risks that could cause our results to vary appears under the caption “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K (“report”). Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report.

PART I

Peet’s Coffee & Tea (“Peet’s” or the “Company”) is a specialty coffee roaster and marketer of fresh roasted whole bean coffee. We sell our coffee under strict freshness standards through multiple channels of distribution including grocery stores, home delivery, office, restaurant and food service accounts and Company-owned and operated stores in six states.

We believe that roasted coffee is a perishable product and we pursue distribution channels that are consistent with our strict freshness standards. For instance, our distribution to grocery stores emphasizes the use of a direct store delivery (“DSD”) system where our employees or agents deliver fresh goods to our grocery partners. We roast to order and ship coffee directly from our roasting facility to our home delivery customers. Our goal is to ensure that customers receive coffee within days of roasting.

We have expanded from a retailer that operates its own outlets to a premium coffee brand available through multiple channels of distribution. We signed our first office coffee distribution agreement in 1997 and have since added a number of restaurants, food service accounts and office coffee distributors in select markets. We added online ordering capability to our website in 1997 to complement our existing mail order home delivery business and have since invested in marketing programs designed to support our home delivery channel. In 1998, we initiated a strategic expansion into specialty grocery and gourmet food stores. This expansion was further developed to include distribution to mainstream grocers as we expanded our grocery accounts from 130 to approximately 4,000 stores. We believe our expansion strategy emphasizes disciplined growth and enhancement of our brand’s image and quality reputation. We operate our business through two reportable segments: retail and specialty sales. See Note 13, “Segment Information” to the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included elsewhere in this report.

1

Table of Contents

Our website is located at www.peets.com. Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, as well as any amendments or exhibits to those reports, are available free of charge through our website at http://peets.com as soon as reasonably practicable after we file them with, or furnish them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Company was organized as a Washington corporation in 1971.

Company Retail Stores

At January 1, 2006, we operated 111 retail stores in six states through which we sell whole bean coffee, beverages and pastries, tea, and other related items. Our stores are designed to facilitate the sale of fresh whole bean coffee and to encourage customer trial of our coffee through coffee beverages. Each store has a dedicated staff person at the bean counter to take orders and assist customers with questions on coffee origins and on home brewing. Upon order, beans are scooped and ground to the customer’s specific requirements. At our beverage counter, we rotate and sell freshly-brewed coffees and coffee-based beverages to promote customer familiarity, sampling, and sales of whole-bean coffees. To ensure that our freshness standards are consistently met, it is our policy not to serve brewed coffee that is more than 30 minutes old and every espresso based drink is made to order using freshly pulled shots of espresso and freshly steamed milk. See “Item 2. Properties” for further discussion about our retail stores.

Specialty Sales

Grocery

In addition to sales through our retail stores, we have expanded the availability of our products through a network of grocery stores, including Safeway, Albertson’s, Ralph’s and Whole Foods Market. To support this expansion, we have developed a DSD sales and distribution system. Peet’s DSD route sales representatives deliver to their stores weekly, properly shelve the product, resolve pricing discrepancies, rotate to ensure freshness, sell and erect free-standing displays and forge store-level selling relationships. We currently have 135 DSD route sales representatives, of which approximately 37 are full-time Peet’s employees, to continue to support the expansion into new grocery accounts in the western United States and our existing grocery customers.

Home Delivery

In the home delivery channel, we have a dedicated website and customer service representatives that provide points of contact to our customers for coffee ordering and coffee knowledge. Our website, peets.com, features an Express Buy function for registered customers for speed and ease, special coffee and tea programs and a coffee and tea selector to assist the customer in choosing a product based upon certain characteristics. Peets.com also features a proprietary tool that allows customers to manage the timing and delivery of their recurring orders. In 2004, we implemented our Peetnik Loyalty Program to reward our most loyal home delivery customers who maintain regular, ongoing deliveries of coffee or tea. This program has proven to be successful in growing our home delivery business online by engaging our most loyal customers to establish regular deliveries of fresh roasted coffee or tea. In addition to our website, we have a team of mail order customer service representatives who assist customers in placing customer orders, choosing a gift item, providing product information and resolving customer issues. Customer service representatives are regularly trained on Peet’s product offerings through weekly coffee and tea tastings.

Food Service and Office

In the food service and office business, we have a staff of sales and account managers who make sales calls to potential and existing accounts and manage our distributor network. Additionally, we have established relationships with office, restaurant and food service distributors to expand our account base in select markets. These distributors have their own sales and account management resources.

2

Table of Contents

Our Coffee

Coffee Beans

Coffee is an agricultural crop that undergoes price fluctuation and quality changes depending on weather, economic and political conditions in coffee producing countries. We purchase only Arabica coffee beans, which are considered superior to beans traded in the commodity market. Thus, the Arabica beans purchased by us tend to trade on a negotiated basis at a substantial premium above commodity coffee prices, depending upon the supply and demand at the time of purchase. Our access to high quality Arabica beans depends on our relationships with coffee brokers, exporters and growers, with whom we have built long-term relationships to ensure a steady supply of coffee beans. We believe that, as a result of our reputation that has been built over 39 years, we have access to some of the highest quality coffee beans from the finest estates and growing regions around the world and we are occasionally presented with opportunities to purchase unique and special coffees.

Unlike roasted coffee beans, green coffee beans are not highly perishable. We generally turn our inventory of green coffee beans two to three times per year. We typically carry approximately $7 million to $15 million worth of green coffee beans in our inventory. We mitigate the risks associated with fluctuations in coffee prices by entering into fixed price commitments and in the past, hedging agreements, for a portion of our green coffee bean requirements.

Our Roasting Method

Our roasting method was first developed by Alfred Peet and further honed by our talented and skilled roasting personnel who make a long-term commitment to our artisan craft. We roast by hand in small batches, and we rely on the skills and training of each roaster to maximize the flavor and potential in our beans. Our roasters undergo an extensive apprenticeship program to learn our roasting method and to gain the skills necessary to roast coffee at Peet’s.

Coffee Types and Blends

Beyond sourcing and roasting, we have developed a reputation for expert coffee blending. Our blends, such as Major Dickason’s Blend^®, are well regarded by our customers for their uniqueness, consistency and special flavor characteristics. We sell approximately 32 types of coffee as regular menu items, Including approximately 21 blends and 11 single origin coffees such as Colombia, Guatemala, Sumatra and Kenya. We also offer a line of high-end reserve coffees including JR Reserve Blend^® and Kona, and we have also featured seasonal reserve coffees such as Jamaica Blue Mountain and Aged Sulawesi Peaberry. We are active in seeking, roasting and selling unique special lot and one-time coffees. On average, we offer four to six such coffees every year, including our Anniversary Blend and Holiday Blend.

Tea, Food and Merchandise

Peet’s offers a line of hand selected whole leaf and bagged tea. Our quality standards for tea are very high. We purchase tea directly from importers and brokers and store and pack the tea at our facility in Emeryville. We offer a limited line of specialty food items, such as jellies, jams and candies. These products are carefully selected for quality and uniqueness.

Our merchandise program consists of items such as brewing equipment for coffee and tea, paper filters and brewing accessories and branded and non-branded cups, saucers, travel mugs and serveware. We do not emphasize these items, but we carry them in retail stores and offer them through home delivery as a means to reinforce our commitment to premium home-brewed coffee and tea.

3

Table of Contents

Competitive Positioning

The specialty coffee market can be characterized as highly fragmented. Our primary competitors in whole bean specialty coffee sales include Gevalia (Kraft Foods), Green Mountain Coffee, Illy Caffé, Millstone (Procter & Gamble), Seattle’s Best (Starbucks) and Starbucks. There are numerous smaller, regional brands that also compete in this category. Premium coffee brands may serve as substitutes for our whole bean coffee and we also compete indirectly against all other coffee brands on the market.

In addition to competing with other distributors of whole bean coffee, we compete with retailers of prepared beverages, including coffee house chains, particularly Starbucks, numerous convenience stores, restaurants, coffee shops and street vendors.

We believe that our customers choose among specialty coffee brands based upon quality, variety, convenience, and to a lesser extent, price. Although consumers may differentiate coffee brands based on freshness (as an element of coffee quality), to our knowledge, few significant competitors focus on product freshness and roast-dating in the same manner as Peet’s. We believe that our market share in the specialty category is based on a solidly differentiated position built on our freshness standards and artisan-roasting style. Because of the fragmented nature of the specialty coffee market, we cannot accurately estimate our market share. However, many of our existing competitors have significantly greater financial, marketing and operating resources.

Our roasted coffee is priced in tiers. Our regular menu coffees are currently priced in our retail locations within a range of $9.95 to $17.95 per pound. Our line of high-end reserve coffees introduced in 2001 are priced between $49.90 and $79.90 per pound. In the grocery channel, we sell our coffee in 12 ounce packages at prices established by the grocery store. Most grocery stores sell our product at a price between $9.99 and $10.99 for a 12 ounce bag.

Intellectual Property

We regard intellectual property and other proprietary rights as important to our success. We place high value on our Peet’s trade name, and we own several trademarks and service marks that have been registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, including Peet’s^®, Peet’s Coffee & Tea^®, peets.com^®, Blend 101^®, Espresso Forte^®, Fresh Fridays^®, Gaia Organic Blend^®, Garuda Blend^®, JR Reserve Blend^®, Maduro Blend^®, Major Dickason’s Blend^®, Pride of the Port^®, Pumphrey’s Blend^®, Sierra Dorada Blend^®, Summer House^®, Snow Leopard^®, Top Blend^® and Vine Street Blend^®. We also have registered trademarks on our stylized logo. In addition, we have applications pending with the United States Patent and Trademark Office for a number of additional marks including eCup^™ and A Cup Is Worth A Thousand Words^™.

We own registered trademarks for our name and logo in Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, China, the European Union, Hong Kong, Japan, Paraguay, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and Thailand. We have filed additional applications for trademark protection in Brazil and the Philippines. In addition to peets.com and coffee.com, we own several other domain names relating to coffee, Peet’s and our roasting process.

In addition to registered and pending trademarks, we consider the packaging for our coffee beans (consisting of dark brown coloring with African-style motif and lettering with a white band running around the lower quarter of the bag) and the design of the interior of our stores (consisting of dark wood fixtures, classic lighting, granite countertops and understated color) to be strong identifiers of our brand. Although we consider our packaging and store design to be essential to our brand identity, we have not applied to register these trademarks and trade dress, and thus cannot rely on the legal protections afforded by trademark registration.

Our ability to differentiate our brand from those of our competitors depends, in part, on the strength and enforcement of our trademarks. We must constantly protect against any infringement by competitors. If a competitor infringes on our trademark rights, we may have to litigate to protect our rights, in which case, we may incur significant expenses and divert significant attention from our business operations.

4

Table of Contents

Information Systems

The information systems installed at Peet’s are used to manage our operations and increase the productivity of our workforce. We believe our point-of-sale system increases store productivity, provides a higher level of service to our customers and maintains timely information for performance evaluation. Our registers have touch screen components and full point-of-sale capability. In 2002, during the rollout of our DSD system in the grocery channel, we implemented a grocery order entry and invoice system with handheld capability that allows our route sales representatives to provide service and information on the spot. In 2003, we implemented business intelligence software to better support and analyze our business in all channels. In 2004, we deployed an integrated labor and scheduling system in our retail stores to improve productivity and customer service.

Our website, www.peets.com, is hosted at our corporate headquarters in Emeryville, California. All website applications are built on Microsoft ASP with in-house development. We offer full-functioning e-commerce and our website is integrated with our call center for access to orders placed at both locations. Online delivery confirmation is provided by United Parcel Service and the United States Postal Service. Our website contains several customer-centered functions. Manage Deliveries is an application which enables consumers to schedule recurring deliveries including choosing specific coffees and teas to be delivered at the frequency of their choice. Other important customer functions include a coffee and tea selector, Express Buy and multiple “ship-to” capability on a single bill. Additionally, customers with Peet’s cards can check their balance as well as reload their card online. We designed our website to provide fast, easy and effective operation when navigating and shopping on our website. We have dedicated information technology employees and marketing staffers for website maintenance, improvement, development and performance.

Employees

As of February 24, 2006, we employ a workforce of 2,813 people, approximately 478 of whom work approximately 40 hours per week and are considered full-time employees. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good. Since 1979, we have provided full benefits to all employees who work at least 21 hours per week and have worked at least 500 total hours for the Company. We continue to offer competitive benefits packages to attract and retain valuable employees.

Government Regulation

Our coffee roasting operations and our retail stores are subject to various governmental laws, regulations, and licenses relating to customs, health and safety, building and land use, and environmental protection. Our roasting facility is subject to state and local air-quality and emissions regulations. If we encounter difficulties in obtaining any necessary licenses or complying with these laws and regulations, then:

We believe that we are in compliance in all material respects with all such laws and regulations and that we have obtained all material licenses that are required for the operation of our business. We are not aware of any environmental regulations that have or that we believe will have a material adverse effect on our operations.

5

Table of Contents

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Set forth below is information with respect to the names, ages, positions and offices of our executive officers as of February 24, 2006.

Patrick J. O’Dea has served as Chief Executive Officer, President and as a director since May 2002. From April 1997 to March 2001, he was CEO of Archway/Mother’s Cookies and Mother’s Cake & Cookie Company. From 1995 to 1997, Mr. O’Dea was the Vice President and General Manager of the Specialty Cheese Division of Stella Foods. From 1984 to 1995, he was with Procter & Gamble, where he marketed several of the company’s snack and beverage brands.

Thomas P. Cawley has served as Chief Financial Officer since July 2003. From August 2000 to June 2003, he was at Gap, Inc. serving as Chief Financial Officer, Gap Brand. From 1986 to August 2000, Mr. Cawley was at PepsiCo/Yum Brands (formerly Tricon Global Restaurants), holding various positions such as Director of Finance, Vice President—Controller, and Chief Financial Officer; Pizza Hut. Previous to 1986, Mr. Cawley was with The Quaker Oats Company and General Foods.

James E. Grimes has served as Vice President of Operations and Information Systems since July 2002. In August 2001, Mr. Grimes founded Supply Chain Consulting, where he provided supply chain management expertise. From 1998 to 2001, he was Senior Vice President of Operations at Archway/Mother’s Cookies. Previously, Mr. Grimes held various positions at Mother’s Cake and Cookie Company, Frito Lay and Procter & Gamble.

Bruce E. Schroder has served as Vice President since June 2003. He is currently serving as Vice President, General Manager Retail and was our Vice President of Specialty from June 2003 to January 2005. From December 2001 through May 2003, he was CEO for HomeGain.com, Inc. an Internet based real estate company. Prior to that, Mr. Schroder spent a combined total of nearly 16 years with PepsiCo, in finance, sales, marketing and general management roles for Pepsi Bottling Group, Taco Bell, Pepsi Fountain Beverage, The North American Coffee Partnership and SoBe. Mr. Schroder began his career as a CPA with Arthur Andersen & Co. and also served as Executive Vice President of Retail Marketing for Wells Fargo Bank.

We may not be successful in the implementation of our business strategy or our business strategy may not be successful, either of which will impede our growth and operating results.

Our business strategy emphasizes expansion through multiple channels of distribution. Currently, our retail stores, which generated over 67% of our 2005 net revenue, continue to be an important element of our business. We do not know whether we will be able to successfully implement our business strategy or whether our business strategy will be successful. Our ability to implement this business strategy is dependent on our ability to:

6

Table of Contents

Our revenue may be adversely affected if we fail to implement our business strategy or if we divert resources to a business strategy that ultimately proves unsuccessful.

Because our business is highly dependent on a single product, specialty coffee, if the demand for specialty coffee decreases, our business could suffer.

Sales of specialty coffee constituted nearly 84% of our 2005 net revenue. Demand for specialty coffee is affected by many factors, including:

Because we are highly dependent on consumer demand for specialty coffee, a shift in consumer preferences away from specialty coffee would harm our business more than if we had more diversified product offerings. If customer demand for specialty coffee decreases, our sales would decrease accordingly.

If we fail to continue to develop and maintain our brand, our business could suffer.

We believe that maintaining and developing our brand is critical to our success and that the importance of brand recognition may increase as a result of competitors offering products similar to ours. Because the majority of our retail stores are located on the West Coast, primarily in California, our brand recognition remains largely regional. Our brand building initiative involves increasing the availability of our products and opening new stores to increase awareness of our brand and create and maintain brand loyalty. If our brand building initiative is unsuccessful, we may never recover the expenses incurred in connection with these efforts and we may be unable to increase our future revenue or implement our business strategy.

Our success in promoting and enhancing the Peet’s brand will also depend on our ability to provide customers with high quality products and customer service. Although we take measures to ensure that we sell only fresh roasted whole bean coffee and that our retail employees properly prepare our coffee beverages, we have no control over our whole bean coffee products once purchased by customers. Accordingly, customers may prepare coffee from our whole bean coffee inconsistent with our standards, store our whole bean coffee for long periods of time or resell our whole bean coffee without our consent, which in each case, potentially affects the quality of the coffee prepared from our products. If customers do not perceive our products and service to be of high quality, then the value of our brand may be diminished and, consequently, our ability to implement our business strategy may be adversely affected.

Because our business is based primarily in California, a worsening of economic conditions, a decrease in consumer spending or a change in the competitive conditions in this market may substantially decrease our revenue and may adversely impact our ability to implement our business strategy.

Our California retail stores generated 59% of our 2005 net revenue and a substantial portion of the revenue from our other distribution channels is generated in California. We expect that our California operations will continue to generate a substantial portion of our revenue. In addition, our California retail stores provide us with means for increasing brand awareness, building customer loyalty and creating a premium specialty coffee brand.

7

Table of Contents

As a result, an economic downturn or other decrease in consumer spending in California may not only lead to a substantial decrease in revenue, but may also adversely impact our ability to market our brand, build customer loyalty, or otherwise implement our business strategy.

Labor conditions in the grocery business could negatively impact our grocery business.

There have been grocery strikes in the past that have negatively impacted our grocery business and it is possible that future grocery strikes in places where we have large distribution may adversely impact our grocery business.

Government mandatory healthcare requirements could adversely affect our profits.

The Company offers healthcare benefits to all employees who work at least 21 hours a week and meet service eligibility requirements. In the past, some states, including California, have unsuccessfully proposed legislation mandating that employers pay healthcare premiums into a state run fund for all employees immediately upon hiring. If legislation similar to this were to be enacted in the states we do business, it could have an adverse affect on the company’s profits.

If we are unable to continue leasing our retail locations or obtain leases for new stores, our existing operations and our ability to expand may be adversely affected.

All of our 111 retail locations at year-end are on leased premises. If we are unable to renew these leases, our revenue and profits could suffer. In addition, we intend to lease other premises in connection with the planned expansion of our retail operations. Because we compete with other retailers and restaurants for store sites and some landlords may grant exclusive locations to our competitors, we may not be able to obtain new leases or renew existing leases on acceptable terms. This could adversely impact our revenue growth and brand building initiatives.

Because we rely heavily on common carriers to ship our coffee on a daily basis, any disruption in their services or increase in shipping costs could adversely affect our business.

We rely on a number of common carriers to deliver coffee to our customers and retail stores. We consider roasted coffee a perishable product and we rely on these common carriers to deliver fresh roasted coffee on a daily basis. We have no control over these common carriers and the services provided by them may be interrupted as a result of labor shortages, contract disputes or other factors. If we experience an interruption in these services, we may be unable to ship our coffee in a timely manner. A delay in shipping could:

Any significant increase in shipping costs could lower our profit margins or force us to raise prices, which could cause our revenue and profits to suffer.

We depend on the expertise of key personnel. If these individuals leave or change their role within our Company without effective replacements, our operations may suffer.

The success of our business is dependent to a large degree on our management and our coffee roasters and purchasers. If members of our management leave without effective replacements, our ability to implement our business strategy could be impaired. If we lost the services of our coffee roasters and purchasers, our ability to source and purchase a sufficient supply of high quality coffee beans and roast coffee beans consistent with our quality standards could suffer. In either case, our business and operations could be adversely affected.

8

Table of Contents

We may not be able to hire or retain additional management and other personnel and our recruiting and training costs may increase as a result of turnover, both of which may increase our costs and reduce our profits and may adversely impact our ability to implement our business strategy.

The success of our business depends upon our ability to attract and retain highly motivated, well-qualified management and other personnel, including technical personnel and retail employees. We face significant competition in the recruitment of qualified employees. Our ability to execute our business strategy may suffer if:

Because we have only one roasting facility, a significant interruption in the operation of this facility could potentially disrupt our operations.

We have only one coffee roasting and distribution facility. A significant interruption in the operation of this facility, whether as a result of a natural disaster or other causes, could significantly impair our ability to operate our business. Since we only roast our coffee to order, we do not carry inventory of roasted coffee in our roasting plant. Therefore, a disruption in service in our roasting facility would impact our sales in our retail and specialty channels almost immediately. Moreover, our roasting and distribution facility and most of our stores are located near several major earthquake faults. The impact of a major earthquake on our facilities, infrastructure and overall operations is difficult to predict and an earthquake could seriously disrupt our entire business.

Our earthquake insurance covers net income, continuing normal operating expenses and extra expenses incurred during the period of restoration. However, in the event of a catastrophic earthquake, our coverage is limited and we would incur additional expenses.

We have a high deductible workers’ compensation insurance program and more claims and higher costs from these claims may adversely affect our profits.

Our current workers’ compensation insurance program is a modified self-insured program with a high deductible with an overall program ceiling to limit exposure. The California workers’ compensation environment has been unpredictable with continually increasing costs in the past five years. The majority of our business is in California; therefore, we are exposed to the same increased costs. Additionally, we have had to estimate our liability for existing claims whose outcome is uncertain. While we believe our reserve methodology on these claims is appropriate today, unfavorable development in this area will also affect any open claims that were filed beginning March 2002, the date we transitioned to a high deductible program. Should a greater amount of claims occur or the settlement costs increase beyond what was anticipated, our expenses could increase and our profitability may decrease.

Increases in the cost and decreases in availability of high quality Arabica coffee beans could impact our profitability and growth of our business.

Green coffee is our largest single cost of sales. We do not purchase coffee on the commodity markets, but price movements in the trading of coffee do impact the price we pay. Over the past fifteen months, the commodity cost for coffee has risen above the range it was trading in for the prior three to four years. Coffee is a trade commodity and, in general, its price can fluctuate depending on:

9

Table of Contents

If the cost of our green coffee beans increases due to any of these or other factors impacting us negatively, we many not be able to pass along those costs to our customers because of the competitive nature of the specialty coffee industry. If we are unable to pass along increased coffee costs, our margin will decrease and our profitability will suffer accordingly. If we are not able to purchase sufficient quantities of high quality Arabica beans due to any of the above factors, we many not be able to fulfill the demand for our coffee, our revenue may decrease and our ability to expand our business may also suffer.

Our roasting methods are not proprietary, so competitors may be able to duplicate them, which could harm our competitive position.

We consider our roasting methods essential to the flavor and richness of our roasted whole bean coffee and, therefore, essential to our brand. Because we do not hold any patents for our roasting methods, it may be difficult for us to prevent competitors from copying our roasting methods. If our competitors copy our roasting methods, the value of our brand may be diminished, and we may lose customers to our competitors. In addition, competitors may be able to develop roasting methods that are more advanced than our roasting methods, which may also harm our competitive position.

Competition in the specialty coffee market is intense and could affect our profits.

Competition in the specialty coffee market is becoming increasingly intense as relatively low barriers to entry encourage new competitors to enter the specialty coffee market. Our whole bean specialty coffee competes with several major national brands, such as Gevalia (Kraft Foods), Green Mountain Coffee, Illy Caffé, Millstone (Procter & Gamble), Seattle’s Best (Starbucks) and Starbucks, as well as numerous smaller, regional brands. In addition, we compete indirectly against all other coffee brands on the market. A number of nationwide coffee marketers, such as Kraft Foods, Procter & Gamble and Nestlé, are distributing premium coffee brands in supermarkets. These premium coffee brands may serve as substitutes for our whole bean coffee. In addition to competing with other distributors of whole bean coffee, we compete with retailers of prepared beverages, including coffee house chains, such as Starbucks and The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf, numerous convenience stores, restaurants, coffee shops and street vendors. If we do not succeed in effectively differentiating ourselves from our competitors or our competitors adopt our strategies, then our competitive position will be weakened.

Despite competing in a fragmented product category, whole bean specialty coffee brands are being established across multiple distribution channels. Several competitors have been aggressive in obtaining distribution in specialty grocery and gourmet food stores, through online and mail order and in office, restaurant and food service locations. Other competitors may have an advantage over us based on their earlier entry into these distribution channels.

Many of these new market entrants may have substantially greater financial, marketing and operating resources than we do. In addition, many of our existing competitors have substantially greater financial, marketing and operating resources than Peet’s.

Lawsuits and other claims against the Company may adversely affect our profits.

We may from time to time become involved in certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, such as the two lawsuits filed in 2003 against us entitled Brian Taraz, et al. vs. Peet’s Coffee & Tea, Inc., and Tracy Coffee, et al. vs. Peet’s Coffee & Tea, Inc. In investigating any claims against the Company or defending any allegations, we may incur legal fees, settlement fees, damages or remediation expenses that may harm our business, reducing our sales and adversely affecting our profitability.

10

Table of Contents

Adverse public or medical opinion about caffeine may harm our business.

Our specialty coffee contains significant amounts of caffeine and other active compounds, the health effects of some of which are not fully understood. A number of research studies conclude or suggest that excessive consumption of caffeine may lead to increased heart rate, nausea and vomiting, restlessness and anxiety, depression, headaches, tremors, sleeplessness and other adverse health effects. An unfavorable report on the health effects of caffeine or other compounds present in coffee could significantly reduce the demand for coffee, which could harm our business and reduce our sales and profits.

Adverse publicity regarding customer complaints may harm our business.

We may be the subject of complaints or litigation from customers alleging beverage and food-related illnesses, injuries suffered on the premises or other quality, health or operational concerns. Adverse publicity resulting from such allegations may materially adversely affect us, regardless of whether such allegations are true or whether we are ultimately held liable.

None.

Peet’s headquarters are located in Emeryville, California, where the Company leases approximately 103,000 square feet of office and production space in multiple locations, including roasting and direct delivery fulfillment facilities. Within these facilities, we have 29,000 square feet devoted to general corporate and retail overhead and a call center for the home delivery business. In August 2005, in anticipation of converting our existing plant to office space, we exercised our option to extend our current lease for an additional ten years through October 2015 with two five year options and the ability to terminate early if needed during the first two years of the lease.

On November 29, 2005, we entered into an agreement with Harbor Bay Acquisition LLC to purchase property in Alameda, California for the purpose of operating a new roasting facility. The agreement specifies that, upon completion of construction, the Company will acquire approximately 460,000 square feet of land and a 135,000 square foot building with related site improvements as specified. Harbor Bay Acquisition LLC will manage the construction of the facility, which has been specifically designed for the Company and upon successful completion, the Company is obligated to purchase the facility and the land. The Company anticipates the plant to be at full production capability by April 2007. See “Item 7. Liquidity and Capital Resources” for further discussion.

In 2005, we opened 20 new stores and closed 1 store. Our retail locations are all company-owned and operated in leased facilities. Our stores are typically located in urban neighborhoods, suburban shopping centers (usually consisting of grocery, specialty and service stores) and on high-traffic streets.

The following table lists the number of retail locations as of January 1, 2006:

11

Table of Contents

We may from time to time become involved in certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Currently, the Company is not a party to any legal proceedings that management believes would have a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

No matters were submitted to a vote of our shareholders during the quarter ended January 1, 2006.

12

Table of Contents

PART II

Market for the Registrant’s Stock

The Company’s common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “PEET”. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices for our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market for each quarter during the last two fiscal years.

As of February 24, 2006, there were approximately 323 registered holders of record of the Company’s common stock. On February 24, 2006, the last sale price reported on the Nasdaq National Market for the common stock was $30.27 per share.

Dividend Policy

We have not declared or paid any dividends on our capital stock since 1990. We expect to retain any future earnings to fund the development and expansion of our business. Therefore, we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

Use of Proceeds from Sales of Registered Securities

We completed our initial public offering of our common stock in January and February 2001 pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-1 initially filed on October 13, 2000, as subsequently amended (File No. 333-47597). As of February 24, 2006, the total net proceeds of $17.8 million from the offering had been used for debt reduction.

We completed our secondary public offering of our common stock in April 2002 pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-3 initially filed on March 27, 2002, as subsequently amended (File No. 333-85085). Net proceeds from the offering were $41.0 million. As of February 24, 2006, all of the net proceeds were invested in interest-bearing, U.S. government, agency and municipal obligations. We expect that our use of proceeds from our secondary offering will conform to the intended use of proceeds as described in our prospectus dated April 19, 2002, except that a portion of the proceeds is expected to be used to purchase a new roasting facility and underlying land (see “Item 7. Liquidity and Capital Resources”) and the proceeds have been invested in interest-bearing, U.S. government, agency, municipal and guaranteed student loan obligations until required for that purpose or for working capital purposes.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table sets forth all purchases made by us or any “affiliated purchaser” as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) of the Exchange Act of the Company’s common stock during 2005.

13

Table of Contents

The table below shows selected consolidated financial data for our last five fiscal years. Our fiscal year is based on a 52 or 53 week year and ends on the Sunday closest to the last day in December.

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this report.

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

(in thousands, except per share data)

14

Table of Contents

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. Except for historical information, the discussion below contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The fiscal year ended January 1, 2006 (fiscal 2005) included 52 weeks, the fiscal year ended January 2, 2005 (fiscal 2004) included 53 weeks, and the fiscal year ended December 28, 2003 (fiscal 2003) included 52 weeks.

Company Overview and Industry Outlook

Peet’s is a specialty coffee roaster and marketer of fresh, deep-roasted whole bean coffee sold through multiple channels of distribution for home and away-from-home enjoyment. Founded in Berkeley, California in 1966, Peet’s has established a loyal customer base with strong brand awareness in California. Our growth strategy is based on the sale of whole bean coffee and high-quality beverages in multiple channels of distribution including our own retail stores, grocery, home delivery, and office and restaurant accounts throughout the United States. Our current expansion strategy is focused in the western United States, where we have strong customer awareness, loyalty and brand affinity.

In 2005, the Company made good progress in its strategy to build out its multiple channels in the western United States. The results of the efforts in 2005 include:

All of these results have been achieved while continuing to provide our customers with the uncompromised quality of our coffee offerings.

We expect the specialty coffee industry to continue to grow. We believe that this growth will be fueled by continued consumer interest in high quality coffee and related products. We believe that by offering high-quality products to consumers throughout the country, we will attract the same loyal customer base that we have attracted in California.

As we grow, our operations will continue to be vertically integrated, allowing us to control the quality of our product at all stages. We purchase high quality Arabica coffee beans from countries around the world, and we utilize our artisan-roasting technique to bring out the distinctive flavor of our coffees. Because roasted coffee is perishable, we are committed to delivering our coffee under the strictest freshness standards. As a result, we do not stock or inventory roasted coffee. We roast to order and ship fresh coffee daily to our stores and customers. Control of purchasing, roasting, packaging and distribution of our coffee allows us to maintain our commitment to freshness, is cost effective, and enhances our margins and profit potential.

15

Table of Contents

Business Segments

Our coffee and related items are sold through multiple channels of distribution that are considered separate segments under SFAS No. 131. These channels provide broad market exposure to potential purchasers of fresh roasted whole bean coffee. We are indifferent as to where consumers purchase our coffees and teas, and believe that our specialty and retail segments are synergistic. However, we also recognize that the economics of our specialty business and retail stores are different enough that we have chosen to report them as separate channels. Therefore, we currently have two reportable segments, consisting of:

We believe growth opportunities exist in all these channels. Our expansion is focused geographically, not by segment. Our first priority is to develop the western U.S. markets where we already have a presence and have higher customer awareness. We will continue to open new stores in strategic locations that meet our demographic profile in these markets, make our coffees more broadly and conveniently located in grocery stores, and partner with distributors and companies who share our passion for quality and freshness and are willing and able to execute accordingly in the food service and office environment.

Business Categories

In addition to our reportable segments, we measure our business by monitoring the volume and revenue growth of two distinct business categories:

We believe these business categories are useful in understanding our results of operations for the periods presented because we operate our stores and record sales through these two categories. Our stores are primarily designed to facilitate the sale of fresh whole bean coffee. The format of our stores replicates that of a specialty grocer. Beans are freshly scooped from bins under the counter, weighed on counter top scales and hand packed into branded bags. In addition, our stores are also designed to encourage customer trial of our coffee through coffee beverages. Each store has a beverage bar that is dedicated to the sale of prepared beverages and artisan baked pastries.

Results of Operations

The following discussion on results of operations should be read in conjunction with “Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data,” the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes and the other financial data included elsewhere in this report.

16

Table of Contents

Our fiscal year is based on a 52 or 53 week year. The fiscal year ends on the Sunday closest to the last day of December.

2005 (52 weeks) Compared with 2004 (53 weeks)

Net revenue

Net revenue for 2005 increased 20.3% versus 2004 as a result of continued expansion of our retail and specialty sales segments. The increase from the same 52 weeks was 22.5% as the extra week accounted for 2.2%.

17

Table of Contents

Sales of whole bean and related products increased 17.1% to $101.0 million. Sales from beverages and pastries increased 24.8% to $74.2 million.

In the retail segment, net revenue increased 17.5% compared to 2004, or 19.8% without the 53^rd week in 2004, primarily as a result of increased sales from the 37 new stores we opened in the last two years and growth in the existing stores. Sales of whole bean coffee and related products in the retail segment increased by 6.6% to $44.9 million, while sales of beverages and pastries increased by 25.4% to $73.1 million. The increase in beverage and pastry sales was primarily caused by sales at the stores we opened in 2004 and 2005, increased traffic in our existing stores, and a price increase in October 2004. The slower growth in whole bean and related products was due to continuing cannibalization of bean sales in retail stores as we increased the availability of Peet’s coffee in grocery stores and the lower mix of whole bean sales in our new stores. During 2005, we opened a total of 20 stores compared to 17 in 2004. As part of our goal of accelerating sales growth to at least 20% for 2005 and beyond, we expect to open approximately 23 to 28 stores in 2006, all of them in the western United States.

In the specialty sales segment, net revenue increased 26.4% compared to 2004, or 28.3% without the 53^rd week in 2004. The $11.9 million increase consisted primarily of a $7.8 million increase in grocery sales and a $1.7 million increase in sales to restaurants and food service companies. The increase in both grocery and food service channel sales was primarily due to continued strong growth in our existing accounts and secondarily due to new accounts we added during the year. In grocery, we added 500 new stores during the year, bringing the number of grocery stores selling Peet’s coffee to approximately 4,000. In the food service area, we selectively added new accounts such as the University of California Berkeley. Net revenue to the home delivery channel, which includes online and mail order, grew 10.2% compared to 2004 as we continued to emphasize loyalty programs that reward customers who subscribe to our recurring order programs. In addition, office coffee sales increased 30.3% primarily due to our effort to expand distributorships.

Cost of sales and related occupancy expenses

Cost of sales and related occupancy expenses consist of product costs, including manufacturing costs, rent and other occupancy and hedging costs. As a percent of net revenue, cost of sales decreased from 46.1% in 2004 to 45.9% in 2005 due to the price increase taken in October 2004 and the adjustment of $0.8 million related to lease accounting in December of 2004. The price increase, which affected coffee, beverages, and tea in our retail stores and home delivery channel, lowered cost as a percent of net revenue by 1.1%. In addition, 2005 cost as a percentage of net revenue was lower than 2004 by 0.4% due to the prior year lease accounting adjustment.

These cost decreases were partially offset by higher coffee and manufacturing costs and the opening of more new stores. New stores increased cost as a percent of net revenue by 0.4% because of their higher occupancy cost on a lower sales base. In addition, increased manufacturing and packaging costs had a greater impact on costs as specialty became a larger part of the business. Lastly, higher coffee cost resulted in an additional 0.2% increase in cost of sales as a percentage of net revenue. We expect our coffee cost, which lags the commodity market price due to future commitments, to continue to increase in 2006.

Operating expenses

Operating expenses as a percent of net revenue for 2005 increased compared to 2004 primarily due to the opening of new stores, partially offset by leverage gained in the specialty segment.

In the retail segment, operating expenses as a percent of sales increased by 1.9% to 40.6%. The increase was due to a 1.6% increase from opening 37 new stores in the last two years. New stores generally have higher operating expenses due to lower sales volume and startup costs. The remaining increase was due to investments made in retail management to support store growth. The increase was partially offset by the October 2004 price increase.

18

Table of Contents

As a percent of net revenue, specialty operating expenses decreased 2.0% to 19.4% as we leveraged the relatively fixed operating structure in grocery, foodservice, office and home delivery channels.

Marketing and advertising expenses

For 2005, marketing and advertising expenses increased $0.2 million compared to the prior year. The increase was driven primarily by retail trial and traffic initiatives, new store promotions, and loyalty programs in home delivery.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses increased 20.6%, or $1.5 million, compared to 2004. As a percent of sales, general and administrative expenses were consistent with last year as we continued to invest in headcount to support our growth.

Depreciation and amortization expenses

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased in 2005 primarily due to the 37 stores we opened during 2005 and 2004.

Investment income, net

We currently invest in U.S. government, agency, municipal and guaranteed student loan obligations. Investment income includes interest income and gains or losses from the sale of these instruments. We earned $1.8 million in interest income in 2005, compared to $1.0 million last year, primarily due to higher interest rates on our investments and a higher average investment balance.

Income tax provision

This year’s effective income tax rate was 38.8% in 2005 versus 37.5% in the prior year. Our effective rate increased 1.0% as we entered into a higher statutory income tax bracket. The impact in 2005 of the benefits we realized from the new domestic production deduction and state enterprise zone credits were offset by the adjustment in 2004 from the removal of the valuation allowance on federal and state charitable contribution carryforwards. We anticipate our effective tax rate to be approximately 39.0% in 2006.

2004 (53 weeks) Compared with 2003 (52 weeks)

Net revenue

Net revenue for 2004 increased 21.6% versus 2003 as a result of continued expansion of our retail and specialty sales segments and the impact of an extra week in fiscal year 2004. The increase from the same 52 weeks was 19.4% as the extra week accounted for 2.2%. While in October 2004, we increased prices of our beverages, whole bean coffee and tea, the impact of the increase on 2004 net revenue was minimal. Sales of whole bean and related products increased 19.8% to $86.3 million. Sales from beverages and pastries increased 24.2% to $59.4 million. A key element of our multi-channel strategy emphasizes the sales of whole bean coffee and related products. As a result, we continued to derive a majority of our net revenue from the sale of whole bean coffee and related products. For 2004, whole bean coffee and related products as a percent of net revenue was 59.2%, slightly down from 2003.

In the retail segment, revenue for 2004 increased 17.1% compared to 2003, or 14.9% without the 53^rd week, primarily as a result of increased sales from the 27 new stores we opened during 2003 and 2004 and growth in the existing stores. Sales of whole bean coffee and related products in the retail segment increased by 7.9% to

19

Table of Contents

$42.1 million, while sales of beverages and pastries increased by 24.8% to $58.3 million. The increase in beverage and pastry sales was primarily caused by sales at the stores we opened in 2003 and 2004, increased traffic in our existing stores, and a revamped pastries program that emphasized our customers’ favorites. The slower growth in whole bean and related products was due to cannibalization of bean sales in retail stores as we increased the availability of Peet’s coffee in grocery stores and the lower mix of whole bean sales in our new stores. During 2004, we opened a total of 17 stores compared to 10 in 2003.

In the specialty sales segment, revenue for 2004 increased 32.9% compared to 2003, or 30.8% without the 53^rd week. The $11.2 million increase consisted primarily of a $7.3 million increase in grocery sales and a $1.9 million increase in sales to restaurants and food service companies. The increase in both grocery and food service channel sales was primarily due to sales to new accounts we added as well and continued strong growth in our existing accounts. In grocery, we added 800 new stores during 2004, bringing the number of grocery stores selling Peet’s coffee to 3,500. In the food service area, we selectively added new accounts such as San Francisco International Airport. Sales to the home delivery channel grew 12.1% in 2004 as compared to 2003 as we continued to emphasize loyalty programs that reward customers who subscribe to our recurring order programs. In addition, office coffee sales increased 17.8% primarily due to our effort to expand distributorships and the stabilizing office population as the job market and the economy recover.

Cost of sales and related occupancy expenses

Cost of sales and related occupancy expenses consist of product costs, including manufacturing costs, rent and other occupancy. As a percent of net revenue, cost of sales increased from 45.9% in 2003 to 46.1% in 2004 due to the adjustment of $0.8 million, or 0.5% of net revenue, related to lease accounting. This adjustment, which increased occupancy expenses, was the result of our review of our lease accounting initiated by a letter released on February 7, 2005 by the SEC. Upon review of all of our leases, we determined that our previous methods of accounting for rent holidays and specific rent escalation terms were not in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These changes do not impact the Company’s historic or future cash flow or the timing or amount of lease payments. This increase as a percent of net revenue was partially offset by negotiated cost savings, waste reductions, and by the retail price increase we took at the end of October, 2004.

In the retail segment, cost of sales and related occupancy expenses as a percent of revenue were flat in 2004 versus the prior year due to several offsetting items. The lease accounting charge increased cost by 0.8%. The impact of opening more new stores, which have higher occupancy cost on a lower sales base, increased cost by 0.8%. These increases were slightly offset by better waste management and the price increase. Better waste management of pastries and packaging costs in our existing stores lowered costs as a percent of net revenue by 1.1%. The price increase, which affected coffee, beverages and tea, lowered cost of sales as a percent of net revenue by an additional 0.4%. In the specialty segment, cost of sales in 2004 increased 0.6% as a percent of net revenue compared to the prior year due to changes in sales mix.

Operating expenses

Operating expenses as a percent of net revenue for 2004 increased compared to 2003 primarily due to the opening of new stores, partially offset by leverage gained in the specialty segment.

In the retail segment, operating expenses as a percent of sales for 2004 increased by 3.2% to 38.7% compared to 2003. The increase was due to a 1.9% increase from opening 27 new stores during 2003 and 2004. New stores generally have higher operating expenses due to lower sales volume and startup costs. The remaining increase was due to investments made in training, recruiting and real estate personnel to support store growth. In addition, operating expenses were also higher due to increased health insurance, workers’ compensation coverage and equipment and building maintenance expenses.

20

Table of Contents

As a percent of revenue, specialty operating expenses for 2004 decreased 2.9% compared to 2003 as we leveraged the relatively fixed operating structure in all areas. The leverage gained was primarily due to implementation costs incurred in 2003 for the DSD system.

Marketing and advertising expenses

For 2004, marketing and advertising expenses decreased compared to the prior year. During the year, we limited our efforts primarily to new store openings and retaining existing customers.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses for 2004 decreased 21.0%, or $2.0 million, as compared to 2003. The decrease was due to the net difference of $4.0 million associated with the wage and hour lawsuit and severance expenses. In 2003, we recorded $3.4 million for these costs. In 2004, after the settlement was final and paid, we reversed $0.6 million of the remaining reserve and recorded an offset to general and administrative expenses. The impact on expenses as a percent of revenue was a decrease of 0.4% to 5.0% in 2004, and an increase of 2.8% to 7.7% in 2003. Offsetting the impact of these charges were increases in general and administrative expenses for investments in headcount to support our growth and higher audit and consulting fees to comply with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Depreciation and amortization expenses

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased in 2004 primarily due to the stores we opened during 2004 and 2003. This increase was partially offset by certain assets becoming fully depreciated during the year.

Investment income, net

We invest excess cash in interest-bearing, U.S. government, agency, municipal and guaranteed student loan obligations. Investment income includes interest income and gains from the sale of these instruments. For 2004, investment income decreased $0.2 million, resulting from prior year gains of $0.3 million compared to none this year, offset by minimal increases in interest income on similar cash and marketable securities balances.

Income tax provision

The effective income tax rate for 2004 was 37.5% versus 40.2% in the prior year. Our effective rate was reduced primarily by the removal of the 2003 valuation allowance on federal and state charitable contribution carryforwards and the tax benefit provided by shifting more of our investments into federal and state tax-exempt securities.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At January 1, 2006, we had $20.6 million in cash and cash equivalents and $49.4 million in short-term and long-term marketable securities for a total of $70.0 million. Working capital was $61.7 million as of January 1, 2006 compared to $16.0 million at January 2, 2005, largely due to the short-term nature of marketable securities.

Net cash provided by operations was $19.5 million in 2005 compared to $19.9 million in 2004. Operating cash flows were positively impacted in 2005 by increased net income offset by increased inventory balances and other changes in working capital.

Net cash used in investing activities was $13.0 million in 2005. Investing activities primarily relate to purchases of property and equipment, the escrow deposit for our new roasting facility, and maturities and purchases of marketable securities. During 2006, maturities net of purchases totaled $2.7 million as we held a

21

Table of Contents

greater amount of cash and cash equivalents at year-end than in the prior year due to the relative yields. Cash paid for property and equipment totaling $14.0 million included:

Net cash provided by financing activities was $2.7 million in 2005. Financing activities in 2005 consisted primarily of $7.7 million from the exercise of stock options by employees offset by the Company’s purchase of $4.9 million of its common stock.

Our 2006 capital expenditures are expected to be between $18.0 and $19.0 million, excluding investments which we may incur late in the year to purchase a new roasting facility. Approximately $11.0 to $13.0 million is expected to be used for the opening of 23 to 28 new retail stores scheduled for 2006 and expenditures for new stores in progress for 2007. The remaining is expected to be used for the remodeling of existing stores, equipment for the grocery channel, information technology enhancements and investments in our roasting plant.

On November 29, 2005, we entered into an agreement with Harbor Bay Acquisition LLC to purchase property in Alameda, California for the purpose of operating a new roasting facility. The agreement specifies that, upon completion of construction, the Company will acquire approximately 460,000 square feet of land and a 135,000 square foot building with related site improvements as specified. The Harbor Bay Acquisition LLC will manage the construction of the facility, which has been specifically designed for the Company’s needs, and upon successful completion, the Company is obligated to purchase the facility and the land. The facility is expected to be delivered to the Company in December 2006 at which time the sale will be finalized. The preliminary purchase price of the facility and the land is estimated at approximately $17.4 million but may change as the result of a competitive bidding process whereby the general contractor will obtain bids from subcontractors for all major divisions of construction based on the final drawings and specifications prepared by the architect and approved by the Company and the Harbor Bay Acquisition LLC. As required by the agreement, the Company initially deposited into escrow $1.5 million. Prior to the start of construction, the Company will be obligated to increase the escrow fund to approximately $3.5 million. Other than for certain material breaches of the agreement by Harbor Bay Acquisition LLC, the deposit is non-refundable. In addition to the facility and the land purchase price, the Company anticipates that it will incur additional capital expenses for equipment and improvements of approximately $7 million to ready the facility for use. While transitioning production and/or office space, we will incur increased ongoing occupancy and depreciation expense as well as incur moving costs. The Company anticipates the plant to be at full production capability by April 2007.

The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations and the timing and effect that such commitments are expected to have on the Company’s liquidity and capital requirements in future periods as of January 1, 2006 (in thousands):

22

Table of Contents

For the next twelve months, we expect our cash flows from operations and cash and marketable securities to be sufficient for our operating and capital requirements, our share purchase program and our contractual obligations as they come due.

Inflation

We do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our results of operation in recent years. However, we cannot predict what effect inflation may have on our results of operations in the future.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires the appropriate application of certain accounting policies, many of which require us to make estimates and assumptions about future events and their impact on amounts reported in our financial statements and related notes. Since future events and their impact cannot be determined with certainty, the actual results will inevitably differ from our estimates. Such differences could be material to the financial statements.

We believe our application of accounting policies, and the estimates inherently required therein, are reasonable. These accounting policies and estimates are periodically reevaluated, and adjustments are made when facts and circumstances dictate a change. Historically, we have found our application of accounting policies to be appropriate, and actual results have not differed materially from those determined using necessary estimates.

Our accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the “Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements,” included elsewhere in this report. We have identified the following critical accounting policies:

23

Table of Contents

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123(R)”). SFAS 123(R) requires companies to (1) use fair value to measure stock-based compensation awards and (2) cease using the intrinsic value method of accounting used by the Company. Compensation cost based on the fair value of the award will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award (usually the vesting period). The Company will adopt SFAS 123(R) beginning January 2, 2006, as required, using the modified prospective method. In addition to the recognition of compensation expense in the financial statements, under SFAS 123R, any excess tax benefits received upon exercise of options will be presented as a financing activity inflow rather than as an adjustment to operating activity as currently presented. Based on current analysis and information, management estimates that the adoption of SFAS 123(R) will result in an increase in stock compensation expense ranging from $4.0 to $5.0 million and a decrease in net income per diluted share ranging from $0.18 to $0.20 in 2006.

In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143 (“FIN 47”). FIN 47 requires the recognition of a liability for the fair value of a legally-required conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred, if the liability’s fair value can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. The Company adopted FIN 47 in the quarter ended January 1, 2006. The adoption of FIN 47 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In November 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 115-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments and Its Application to Certain Investments (“FSP 115-1”). FSP 115-1 provides accounting guidance for identifying and recognizing other-than-temporary impairments of debt and equity securities, as well as cost method investments in addition to disclosure requirements. FSP 115-1 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005, and earlier application is permitted. The Company adopted FSP 115-1 during the fourth quarter ended January 1, 2006. The adoption of FSP 115-1 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

We invest excess cash in interest-bearing, U.S. government, agency, municipal and guaranteed student loan obligations. These financial instruments are all subject to fluctuations of daily interest rates. Therefore our investment portfolio is exposed to market risk from these changes.

The supply and price of coffee are subject to significant volatility and can be affected by multiple factors in the producing countries, including weather, political and economic conditions. In addition, green coffee bean prices have been affected in the past, and may be affected in the future, by the actions of certain organizations and associations that have historically attempted to influence commodity prices of green coffee beans through agreements establishing export quotas or restricting coffee supplies worldwide.

We currently use fixed-price purchase commitments, but in the past have used and may potentially in the future use coffee futures and coffee futures options to manage coffee supply and price risk.

Fixed-Price and Not-Yet-Priced Purchase Commitments

We enter into fixed-price purchase commitments in order to secure an adequate supply of quality green coffee beans and fix our cost of green coffee beans. These commitments are made with established coffee brokers and are denominated in U.S. dollars. We also enter into “not-yet-priced” commitments based on a fixed premium over the New York “C” market with the option to fix the price at any time. As of January 1, 2006, we had approximately $26.5 million in open fixed-priced purchase commitments and approximately $0.5 in

24

Table of Contents

not-yet-priced commitments for a total of approximately $27.0 million with delivery dates ranging from January 2006 through December 2007. We believe, based on relationships established with our suppliers, that the risk of non-delivery on such purchase commitments is low.

Coffee Futures and Futures Options

We may use coffee futures and futures options to reduce the price risk of our coffee purchase requirements that we cannot make or have not made on a contractual basis. These instruments are traded on the New York Coffee, Sugar & Cocoa Exchange. We use these futures and options solely for financial hedging purposes and never take actual delivery of the coffee traded on the exchange. These derivative instruments qualify for hedge accounting. The effective portion of the gains and losses are accounted for as inventory costs and are recorded as expense or income when the related coffee is sold. The ineffective portion is recorded as an expense or income immediately. The extent of our coffee futures and coffee futures options positions at any given time depends on the amount of coffee we have contracted to purchase, the amount of coffee qualified for hedge accounting and general market conditions and trends. Our hedging positions are only placed by the Chief Financial Officer through one brokerage firm that we believe to be reputable. As of January 1, 2006, we held no coffee futures or futures options. We had no outstanding positions at January 1, 2006 or January 2, 2005. We do not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading purposes.

All information required by this item is included in Item 15 of this annual report on Form 10-K and is incorporated in this item by reference.

None.

Conclusion regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting required by this item is included on page F-2 in Item 15 of this annual report on Form 10-K and is incorporated in this item by reference. No significant changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting we made during the quarter ended January 1, 2006.

None.

25

Table of Contents

PART III

Information with respect to continuing directors and nominees of the Company is set forth under the caption “Election of Directors” in the Company’s proxy statement relating to its 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Proxy Statement”) and is incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 10-K. The Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 14a-6(c) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act.”). With the exception of the foregoing information and other information specifically incorporated by reference into this annual report Form 10-K, the Proxy Statement is not being filed as a part hereof. Information respecting executive officers of the Company is set forth at Part I of this Report.

Information with respect to compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is set forth under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 10-K.

Information concerning executive compensation required by Item 11 is set forth under the captions “Executive Compensation,” “Stock Option Grants and Exercises,” “Employment Agreements” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks” in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 10-K.

Information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management required by Item 12 is set forth under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Our Equity Incentive Plans” in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 10-K.

Information concerning certain relationships and related transactions required by Item 13 is set forth under the captions “Employment Agreements” and “Certain Transactions” in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 10-K.

Information concerning principal accounting fees and services required by Item 14 is set forth under the caption “Proposal 2—Ratification of Selection of Independent Auditors” in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 10-K.

26

Table of Contents

PART IV

The following documents are filed as part of this annual report on Form 10-K.

(a)(1) Index to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following Consolidated Financial Statements of Peet’s Coffee & Tea, Inc. and its subsidiaries are filed as part of this annual report on Form 10-K:

(a)(2) Index to Financial Statement Schedule.

Schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not required or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.

(a)(3) Listing of Exhibits

27

Table of Contents

28

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Patrick J. O’Dea and Thomas P. Cawley and each of them, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place, and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this report and to file the same, with all granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

29

Table of Contents

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F-1

Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

To our shareholders:

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, and effected by our board of directors, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on our evaluation under the COSO framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January 1, 2006.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has audited management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of January 1, 2006. Deloitte & Touche LLP’s attestation report on management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting is included herein.

March 16, 2006

F-2

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Shareholders of Peet’s Coffee & Tea, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Peet’s Coffee & Tea, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 1, 2006 and January 2, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended January 1, 2006. We also have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 1, 2006 based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements, an opinion on management’s assessment, and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of January 1, 2006 and January 2, 2005, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended January 1, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 1, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 1, 2006, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Francisco, California

March 16, 2006

F-3

Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

PEET’S COFFEE & TEA, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share amounts)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4

Table of Contents

PEET’S COFFEE & TEA, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share amounts)