SEC Info  
  Home     Search     My Interests     Help     Sign In     Please Sign In  

Pharmasset Inc · S-1/A · On 4/6/07

Filed On 4/6/07 5:03pm ET   ·   SEC File 333-133907   ·   Accession Number 1193125-7-76360

  in   Show  and 
  As Of               Filer                 Filing     As/For/On Docs:Pgs              Issuer               Agent

 4/06/07  Pharmasset Inc                    S-1/A                  3:297                                    RR Donnelley/FA

Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration Statement (General Form)   ·   Form S-1
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: S-1/A       Amendment No. 4 to Form S-1                         HTML  2,029K 
 2: EX-23.2     Consent of Deloitte & Touche Llp                    HTML      6K 
 3: EX-23.3     Consent of Grant Thorton Llp                        HTML      5K 


S-1/A   ·   Amendment No. 4 to Form S-1
Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page
"Table of Contents
"Summary
"Risk Factors
"Forward-Looking Statements
"Use of Proceeds
"Dividend Policy
"Capitalization
"Dilution
"Selected Consolidated Financial Data
"Management s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
"Business
"Management
"Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
"Principal Stockholders
"Description of Capital Stock
"Shares Eligible for Future Sale
"Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for Non-U.S. Holders
"Underwriting
"Legal Matters
"Experts
"Change in Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
"Where You Can Find More Information
"Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
"Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
"Consolidated Balance Sheets
"Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Net (Loss) Profit
"Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Stock and Warrants
"Consolidated Statements of Stockholders (Deficit) Equity
"Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
"Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

This is an EDGAR HTML document rendered as filed.  [ Alternative Formats ]


Sponsored Ads...
  Amendment No. 4 to Form S-1  
Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 6, 2007

Registration No. 333-133907


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 


 

AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 


 

Pharmasset, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 


 

Delaware   2834   98-0406340

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(Primary Standard Industrial

Classification Code Number)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

303-A College Road East

Princeton, New Jersey 08540

(609) 613-4100

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

 


 

P. Schaefer Price

President and Chief Executive Officer

Pharmasset, Inc.

303-A College Road East

Princeton, New Jersey 08540

(609) 613-4100

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

 


 

copies to:

 

Danielle Carbone, Esq.

Shearman & Sterling LLP

599 Lexington Avenue

New York, New York 10022

Telephone: (212) 848-4000

Facsimile: (212) 848-7179

 

Richard A. Drucker, Esq.

Davis Polk & Wardwell

450 Lexington Avenue

New York, New York 10017

Telephone: (212) 450-4000

Facsimile: (212) 450-3800

 


 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to public:    As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

 

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box.  ¨

 

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

 

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

 

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

 


 

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

 

                 

Title of Each Class of

Securities to be Registered

  Amount to be
Registered
  Proposed Maximum
Offering Price per
Share (1)
  Proposed Maximum
Aggregate Offering
Price (1)(2)
  Amount of
Registration Fee
(3)(4)

Common Stock, par value $.001 per share

  6,900,000   $14.00   $96,600,000   $8,688
                 
(1)   Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the amount of the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(a) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
(2)   Includes common stock issuable upon the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option.
(3)   Calculated pursuant to Rule 457(o) based on an estimate of the proposed maximum aggregate offering price.
(4)   Includes $8,025 previously paid in connection with the initial filing of the registration statement.

 


 

The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until this registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.



Table of Contents

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

 

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED                     , 2007

 

Prospectus

 

6,000,000 Shares

 

Picture -- LOGO

 

Pharmasset, Inc.

 

Common Stock

 


 

Pharmasset, Inc. is offering 6,000,000 shares of common stock. This is our initial public offering, and no public market currently exists for our shares. We anticipate that the initial public offering price will be between $12.00 and $14.00 per share. After the offering, the market price for our shares may be outside this range.

 


 

We have applied to list our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “VRUS.”

 


 

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. See “ Risk Factors” beginning on page 9.

 


       Per Share      Total    

Offering price

     $                  $            

Discounts and commissions to underwriters

     $                  $            

Offering proceeds to Pharmasset, Inc., before expenses

     $                  $            

 

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved these securities or determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

We have granted the underwriters the right to purchase up to 900,000 additional shares of common stock to cover any over-allotments. The underwriters can exercise this right at any time within 30 days after the offering. The underwriters expect to deliver the shares of common stock to investors on or about                     , 2007.

 

Banc of America Securities LLC   UBS Investment Bank

JMP Securities

 

                    , 2007


Table of Contents

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not, and the underwriters have not, authorized anyone to provide you with different information. We are not making an offer of these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that the information contained in this prospectus is accurate as of the date on the front of this prospectus only. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.

 

Pharmasset and our logo are our trademarks, and Racivir is our registered trademark. Other trademarks mentioned in this prospectus are the property of their respective owners.

 


 

 TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

     Page

Summary

   1

Risk Factors

   9

Forward-Looking Statements

   34

Use of Proceeds

   35

Dividend Policy

   35

Capitalization

   36

Dilution

   37

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

   39

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   41

Business

   56

Management

   96

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

   117

Principal Stockholders

   121

Description of Capital Stock

   124

Shares Eligible for Future Sale

   129

Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for Non-U.S. Holders

   131

Underwriting

   134

Legal Matters

   140

Experts

   140

Change in Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   140

Where You Can Find More Information

   141

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

   F-1

 

i


Table of Contents

 SUMMARY

 

Although this summary highlights information about us and our business that we believe is important for you to read and consider, you should read this entire prospectus carefully, including Risk Factorsbeginning on page 9 and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes to those financial statements beginning on page F-1, before you decide to buy our common stock. In this prospectus, all references to “Pharmasset,” the company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Pharmasset, Inc. Unless otherwise noted, all market size data is derived from research conducted by Datamonitor, an independent research provider.

Our Business

 

Overview

 

We are a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company committed to discovering, developing and commercializing novel drugs to treat viral infections. Our primary focus is on the development of oral therapeutics for the treatment of hepatitis B virus, or HBV, hepatitis C virus, or HCV and human immunodeficiency virus, or HIV. Our research and development efforts focus on a class of compounds known as nucleoside analogs, which act to inhibit the natural enzymes required for viral replication. We are currently focusing on three product candidates, two of which we are developing ourselves and one of which we are developing with a strategic partner:

 

   

Clevudine, for the treatment of HBV, expected to enter Phase 3 registration clinical trials in the second calendar quarter of 2007;

 

   

R7128, a pro-drug of PSI-6130 for the treatment of HCV, in a Phase 1 clinical trial; and

 

   

Racivir, for the treatment of HIV, in a Phase 2 clinical trial.

 

We are developing clevudine and Racivir ourselves in the major global antiviral markets, and we have formed a strategic collaboration with F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. (collectively Roche) for the development of PSI-6130 and its pro-drugs, including R7128. We are also evaluating the efficacy and safety of dexelvucitabine, or DFC, for the treatment of HIV following the completion of a Phase 2b clinical trial.

 

Roche is a market leader in HCV therapy through their FDA-approved products, Pegasys and Copegus, according to Datamonitor. We believe R7128 represents an HCV product candidate that could complement Roche’s expanding HCV franchise. Our Roche collaboration provides us with potential income from milestone payments that can be used to fund the advancement of our proprietary product candidates. Under this collaboration, Roche will reimburse us for all of the currently expected external expenses (up to an agreed-upon amount) associated with, and we will be responsible for, certain preclinical work, the IND filing, and the initial clinical trial. Roche will fund all of the expenses of, and be responsible for, other preclinical studies, future clinical development and commercialization of R7128. We will continue to develop and retain worldwide rights to ongoing and future HCV programs unrelated to the PSI-6130 series of nucleoside polymerase inhibitors licensed to Roche.

 

Although there are many currently approved antiviral drugs, there is an unmet medical need for hepatitis drugs that offer a sustained viral response, or SVR, defined as a viral load that is undetectable 24 weeks after the cessation of therapy, as quantified by a standard test called a polymerase chain reaction test, or PCR test. For HBV and HCV, pegylated interferon has demonstrated the ability to offer an SVR for some patients. Pegylated interferon is a modified version of alpha interferon, a protein that occurs naturally in the human body and boosts the immune system’s ability to fight viral infections. However, pegylated interferon is injectable and has serious side effects, including fatigue, bone marrow suppression, anemia and neuropsychiatric effects. In the treatment of HBV, pegylated interferon is not widely used because it produces an SVR in too few patients to justify its serious side effects. In the treatment of HCV, pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin provides a higher SVR rate and is the standard of care. In both HBV and HCV, we believe there is a medical need for drugs that offer an improved SVR rate with fewer side effects. We believe that sales of HCV drugs increased as new therapies that

 

 

1


Table of Contents

improved the SVR rate were introduced. For example, when adding ribavirin to interferon in 1998 increased the SVR rate from a range of about 13% to 19% to a range of about 38% to 43%, sales of HCV drugs increased significantly from approximately $400 million in 1996 to approximately $600 million in 1998. Additionally, when the replacement of interferon with pegylated interferon in 2000 further increased the SVR rate to a range of about 47% to 54%, sales of HCV drugs again increased significantly from more than $1.3 billion in 2000 to more than $2.0 billion in 2002. For HBV and HCV patients that do not achieve an SVR and for HIV patients, treatment involves a lifelong regimen of antiviral drugs to keep their viral load as low as possible. During such prolonged treatment, viral mutations occur that make the viruses resistant to the drugs being used. We believe there is a medical need for drugs that are effective against resistant viruses and can replace existing therapies that have lost effectiveness.

 

Clevudine

 

Clevudine is an oral, once-daily pyrimidine nucleoside analog that we are developing for the treatment of HBV. We licensed clevudine from Bukwang Pharm. Co., Ltd., or Bukwang, a Korean pharmaceutical company. Based on two completed Korean Phase 3 clinical trials conducted in 337 patients, Bukwang received Korean approval for clevudine in November 2006. Bukwang has recently initiated the commercial launch of clevudine in the Korean market under the brand name Levovir. We plan to initiate two Phase 3 clinical trials of clevudine for registration in the United States and Europe in the second calendar quarter of 2007 to determine its safety and efficacy in patients given 30 mg per day over a 48-week treatment course when compared to adefovir, an approved HBV therapy. The primary endpoint of these registration studies is expected to be a composite endpoint measuring the percentage of patients with undetectable HBV DNA (less than 300 copies/ml) and the normalization of liver enzyme levels at the 48th week on therapy. We believe these trials will be designed to test the superiority of clevudine over adefovir on this combined endpoint. We also plan to continue these studies from week 48 to week 96 to gather additional safety and efficacy data, as well as assess clevudine’s SVR rate.

 

In March 2006, Bukwang completed Study 303, a Korean open-label study of clevudine in 55 HBV patients, including 15 patients in whom the e-antigen was not present and who have not been previously exposed to anti-viral therapies, referred to as treatment-naïve patients. Chronic hepatitis B patients are classified into two groups: e-antigen positive individuals are those in whom the e-antigen is present and e-antigen negative persons are those in whom the e-antigen is not present. The e-antigen is a viral protein that indicates active replication of HBV. The e-antigen negative form of the disease has been more difficult to treat effectively than the e-antigen positive form. In Study 303, 80% of e-antigen negative patients sustained a viral load that was undetectable by PCR 12 weeks after completing the 48-week course of therapy. Based on the results of completed clinical trials, we believe clevudine has the potential to provide an improved SVR rate without the serious side effects of interferon and with the convenience of oral administration.

 

R7128

 

Roche and we are developing R7128 for the treatment of HCV. R7128 is a pro-drug of a molecule we discovered named PSI-6130, an oral cytidine nucleoside analog. A pro-drug is a chemically modified form of a molecule designed to enhance the absorption, distribution and metabolic properties of that molecule. PSI-6130 demonstrated potent and specific anti-HCV activity in preclinical cell-based assays against wild-type HCV. In these assays, PSI-6130 was approximately five-fold more potent in vitro than the parent molecules of NM-283 and R1626, in development by Idenix and Roche, respectively, for the treatment of HCV. In combination with interferon, PSI-6130 was active and additive to the activity of interferon alone in these preclinical assays. In combination with other classes of HCV inhibitors, PSI-6130 appeared to be additive within the range of concentrations tested.

 

In October 2006, Roche and we initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial with R7128 designed to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of R7128 in healthy volunteers and HCV-infected patients, as well as provide antiviral potency

 

 

2


Table of Contents

data over 14 days in HCV-infected patients. Roche and we recently completed Part 1 of this study, which involved dosing 38 healthy volunteers with R7128. Preliminary safety and pharmacokinetic data from Part 1 of this study supported progression, in February 2007, of R7128 to Part 2 of this study which involves dosing 40 HCV-infected patients for 14 days. We currently anticipate that the data from this study will be available in the third quarter of 2007, and we anticipate the initiation of a Phase 2 combination study of R7128 with Pegasys and Copegus in the first half of 2008. Further testing will be required to provide enough evidence of safety and efficacy to support an NDA filing with the FDA in the future.

 

Racivir

 

Racivir is an oral, once-daily cytidine nucleoside analog that we are developing as an HIV therapy for use in combination with other approved HIV drugs. A major challenge of antiviral therapy is the emergence of viral mutations that result in forms of the virus that are resistant to current therapies. In a recently completed Phase 2 clinical trial, for those patients carrying the M184V mutation and less than three thymidine analog mutations, replacing lamivudine (a component of the standard first treatment regimen for HIV patients, with annual sales of approximately $1 billion) with Racivir in their existing therapies caused a mean decrease in viral load of 0.7 log (80% reduction) in the second week of treatment, with 28% of these patients achieving an undetectable level of virus (less than 400 copies per milliliter) and 64% of these patients achieving at least a 0.5 log decrease (68% reduction) in viral load. These results suggest that an HIV combination therapy regimen containing Racivir may benefit HIV patients failing their first treatment regimen.

 

Nucleoside Analog Opportunities in HBV, HCV and HIV

 

We believe nucleoside analogs are well suited to treat viral diseases because they can be designed to be highly specific and potent, are relatively simple to manufacture, and have the potential for oral administration. Nucleoside analog drugs have a well-established development and regulatory history, with 14 nucleoside analogs approved by the FDA for the treatment of HBV, HCV or HIV. In addition to clevudine, R7128, Racivir and DFC, we also have other nucleoside analog discovery programs focused on HIV and HCV. Our scientific team of virologists, biologists and nucleoside chemists has experience discovering and developing nucleoside analog drugs for antiviral indications. Collectively, our management team’s product development experience includes 25 New Drug Application, or NDA, approvals. Our discovery platform includes a library of nucleoside analogs and a collection of viral and cellular assays that we use to evaluate potential new product candidates.

 

Risk Factors

 

We are subject to a number of risks of which you should be aware that may prevent us from achieving our primary objectives, such as:

 

   

All of our product candidates are in the development stage;

 

   

Neither we nor our collaborative partner has received regulatory approval for, or generated commercial revenues from, any of our product candidates, except for clevudine for which Bukwang has recently received marketing approval in Korea;

 

   

We may be unsuccessful in maintaining a broad pipeline of potential product candidates or in discovering new product candidates;

 

   

We have no experience commercializing drug products ourselves and may be unable to enter into additional collaborations on favorable terms or at all.

 

These risks and the other risks that we face are more fully described under the heading “Risk Factors,” which you should review carefully before you decide to buy our common stock.

 

We incurred net losses of $5.0 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, $13.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and $11.3 million in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006. For the three

 

 

3


Table of Contents

months ended December 31, 2006, we had a net profit of $3.9 million due to a one-time milestone payment from Roche. At December 31, 2006, our accumulated deficit was $46.7 million. We expect to continue to incur significant operating losses for at least the next several years.

 

Corporate Information

 

We were initially incorporated as Pharmasset, Ltd. on May 29, 1998 under the laws of Barbados. We became domesticated as a corporation under the laws of the State of Delaware on June 8, 2004 as Pharmasset, Inc., and the existence of Pharmasset, Ltd. in Barbados was discontinued on June 21, 2004. Pharmasset, Inc., then-existing as a Georgia corporation and the only subsidiary of Pharmasset, Ltd. was merged with and into us on July 23, 2004.

 

In 2005, we changed our fiscal year end from December 31 to September 30 for financial reporting purposes. The change was effective for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2005. For tax reporting purposes in 2005, we retained a twelve-month year ended December 31, 2005.

 

Our principal executive offices are located at 303-A College Road East, Princeton, New Jersey 08540. Our telephone number is (609) 613-4100, and our Internet address is www.pharmasset.com. Information contained in our website does not constitute a part of this prospectus.

 

 

4


Table of Contents

The Offering

 

Common stock offered

6,000,000 shares

 

Common stock to be outstanding after this offering

21,524,071 shares

 

Over-allotment option

900,000 shares

 

Use of proceeds

We intend to use the net proceeds of this offering to advance our clinical development program for clevudine into phase 3 clinical trials.

 

Proposed Nasdaq Global Market symbol

“VRUS”

 

The number of shares of our common stock that will be outstanding after this offering is based on 15,524,071 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2006 after giving effect, upon the closing of this offering, to the automatic conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock and redeemable common stock and the automatic cashless net exercise of Series D-1 warrants into shares of our common stock, assuming $13.00 as the current market price of the common stock in connection with such exercise. Unless specifically stated otherwise, the information in this prospectus assumes a 1.5 to 1.0 reverse split of our common stock to be effected prior to the effectiveness of the registration statement for this offering, and excludes:

 

   

2,662,858 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2006, at a weighted average exercise price of $3.59 per share, of which options to purchase 1,268,227 shares of our common stock were then exercisable;

 

   

836,640 shares of our common stock issuable as of December 31, 2006 upon the exercise of Series D-1 warrants exercisable at an exercise price of $0.10;

 

   

Approximately 1,622,331 shares of our common stock reserved for future grant under our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, which will become effective upon completion of this offering, including the addition of 412,985 shares of common stock reserved for future grant under our 1998 Stock Plan upon the effectiveness of our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan; and

 

   

900,000 shares of our common stock issuable in connection with the underwriters’ over-allotment option.

 

Additionally, unless stated otherwise, the information in this prospectus does not reflect 310,028 shares of our common stock issued upon exercise of stock options between December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2007, or 140,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options granted between December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2007.

 

 

5


Table of Contents

Summary Consolidated Financial Data

 

The following table contains our summary consolidated financial information. In 2005, we changed our fiscal year end from December 31 to September 30 for financial reporting purposes. The change was effective for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2005. The following summary statement of operations data for the year ended December 31, 2004, the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and the year ended September 30, 2006 and the balance sheet data as of September 30, 2005 and 2006 have been derived from our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary statement of operations data for the three months ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2006, have been derived from our unaudited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus and have been prepared on the same basis as our financial statements. In the opinion of management, the unaudited summary financial data presented below reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of this data. The statement of operations data for the year ended December 31, 2003 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2004 have been derived from our audited financial statements that are not included in this prospectus. The summary statements of operations data for the year ended December 31, 2002 has been derived from our unaudited financial statements that are not included in this prospectus. The results from the nine-month period ended September 30, 2005 are not indicative of results that would have been achieved for the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2005.

 

The pro forma net loss per common share reflects the automatic conversion upon the closing of this offering of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock and redeemable common stock into shares of our common stock as of the beginning of each period presented. The pro forma as adjusted balance sheet data reflect the automatic conversion upon the closing of this offering of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock and redeemable common stock into shares of our common stock and the sale of 6,000,000 shares of our common stock offered based on an assumed initial public offering price of $13.00 per share, the mid-point of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us. The summary financial information set forth below should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes to those financial statements, as well as “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in any future period, and the results for the three months ended December 31, 2006 are not indicative of results expected for the full fiscal year.

 

Management determined, subsequent to their issuance, that our financial statements for the fiscal years 2004 and 2005 and the three months ended December 31, 2005 should be restated to increase the carrying value of the Series D Preferred Stock as of December 31, 2004, September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2005 to include amounts representing dividends using the interest method. See Note 15 to the audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

 

6


Table of Contents
    Year Ended December 31,

   

Nine Months
Ended

September 30,


   

Year

Ended

September 30,


    Three Months
Ended
December 31,


    2002

    2003

   

2004

Restated (1)


   

2005

Restated (1)


    2006

    2005
Restated (1)


    2006

                                         

Statement of Operations Data:

                                                     

Revenues:

                                                     

Contract revenues

        $ 509     $ 2,208     $ 3,719     $ 5,425     $ 833     $ 8,117

Contract revenues, related parties

  $ 3,393                                    

Government grant revenues

    299       538       545                        
   


 


 


 


 


 


 

Total revenues

    3,692       1,047       2,753       3,719       5,425       833       8,117
   


 


 


 


 


 


 

Costs and expenses:

                                                     

Research and development

    5,751       4,809       5,317       10,468       10,498       2,244       2,562

General and administrative

    1,321       1,761       2,898       8,096       7,911       1,960       2,055
   


 


 


 


 


 


 

Total costs and expenses

    7,072       6,570       8,215       18,564       18,409       4,204       4,617
   


 


 


 


 


 


 

Operating (loss) profit

    (3,380 )     (5,522 )     (5,462 )     (14,845 )     (12,984 )     (3,371 )     3,500

Investment income

    333       182       495       1,136       1,659       280       407
   


 


 


 


 


 


 

(Loss) profit before income taxes

    (3,047 )     (5,341 )     (4,967 )     (13,709 )     (11,325 )     (3,091 )     3,907

Provision for income taxes

    84       337       17                        
   


 


 


 


 


 


 

Net (loss) profit

    (3,131 )     (5,677 )     (4,984 )     (13,709 )     (11,325 )     (3,091 )     3,907

Preferred stock accretion

    37       37       1,317       2,287       1,111       274       284
   


 


 


 


 


 


 

Net (loss) profit attributable to common shareholders

  $ (3,168 )   $ (5,714 )   $ (6,301 )   $ (15,996 )   $ (12,436 )   $ (3,365 )   $ 3,623
   


 


 


 


 


 


 

 

    Year Ended December 31,

   

Nine Months
Ended

September 30,


   

Year

Ended

September 30,


    Three Months Ended
December 31,


    2002

    2003

   

2004

Restated (1)


   

2005

Restated (1)


    2006

    2005
Restated (1)


    2006

                                         

Net (loss) profit per common share:

                                                     

Basic

  $ (0.81 )   $ (1.40 )   $ (1.53 )   $ (2.42 )   $ (1.19 )   $ (0.33 )   $ 0.35

Diluted

  $ (0.81 )   $ (1.40 )   $ (1.53 )   $ (2.42 )   $ (1.19 )   $ (0.33 )   $ 0.33

Weighted average number of shares used in per common share calculations:

                                                     

Basic

    3,894,167       4,107,473       4,110,997       6,630,463       10,462,369       10,374,839       10,504,693

Diluted

    3,894,167       4,107,473       4,110,997       6,630,463       10,462,369       10,374,839       11,009,257

Pro forma net (loss) profit per common share:

                                                     

Basic

                                  $ (0.86 )           $ 0.24

Diluted

                                  $ (0.86 )           $ 0.23

Weighted average number of shares used in pro forma per common share calculations:

                                                     

Basic

                                    14,654,761               14,697,085

Diluted

                                    14,654,761               16,019,055

 

 

7


Table of Contents
   

As of December 31,
2004

Restated (1)


   

As of September 30,
2005

Restated (1)


  As of September 30,
2006


    As of December 31,
2006


  Pro Forma
As Adjusted


    (in thousands)    

Balance Sheet Data:

                                 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 307     $ 33,442   $ 26,182     $ 29,312   $ 99,852

Short-term investments

    54,932       12,007     1,250       1,252     1,252

Working capital

    51,687       38,822     25,004       29,207     99,747

Total assets

    57,417       47,441     32,998       36,927     107,467

Deferred revenue

    12,136       12,044     9,168       8,976     8,976

Redeemable convertible preferred stock

    50,178       18,530     19,641       19,661    

Total stockholders’ (deficit) equity

  $ (7,431 )   $ 11,668   $ (220 )   $ 4,008   $ 95,601

(1)   Management determined, subsequent to their issuance, that our financial statements for fiscal year 2004, the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and the three months ended December 31, 2005 should be restated to increase the carrying value of the Series D Preferred Stock as of December 31, 2004, September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2005 to include amounts representing dividends using the interest method. See Note 15 to the audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

 

8


Table of Contents

 RISK FACTORS

 

An investment in our common stock involves significant risks. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the following risk factors in addition to the other information in this prospectus. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, results of operations or financial condition would likely suffer. In such an event, the market price of our common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.

 

Risks Related to Our Business

 

Risks Related to Drug Discovery, Development and Commercialization

 

We are subject to significant regulatory requirements, which could delay, prevent or limit our ability to market our product candidates, including clevudine, Racivir, R7128 and DFC.

 

Our research and development activities, preclinical studies, clinical trials, manufacturing and the anticipated marketing of our product candidates are subject to extensive regulation by a wide range of governmental authorities in the United States, including the FDA and by comparable authorities in Europe and elsewhere. To date, none of our product candidates has been approved for sale by the FDA or any foreign regulatory authority except clevudine, for which Bukwang has recently received marketing approval in Korea. Neither we nor our collaborators, independently or collectively, will be able to commercialize any of our product candidates until we or they obtain FDA approval in the United States or approval by comparable regulatory agencies in Europe and other countries. To satisfy FDA or foreign regulatory approval standards for the commercial sale of our product candidates, we must, among other requirements, demonstrate in adequate and well-controlled clinical trials that our product candidates are safe and effective. We, Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), the FDA or applicable foreign regulatory authorities could suspend the clinical trials of a drug candidate at any time if there is a concern that the patients participating in such clinical trials are being exposed to unacceptable health risks or for other reasons. Adverse side effects of a product candidate on patients in a clinical trial could result in the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities refusing to approve a particular drug candidate for any and all indications of use.

 

We have conducted initial preclinical studies and early-stage clinical trials of Racivir, PSI-6130, of which R7128 is a pro-drug, and DFC. These trials were not primarily designed to demonstrate the efficacy of Racivir, PSI-6130 or DFC as therapeutic agents, but rather to collect data on safety and assist in determining the appropriate dose. Even if our product candidates achieve positive results in preclinical and early clinical trials, similar results may not be observed in subsequent trials and results may not prove to be statistically significant or demonstrate safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of the FDA or other regulatory agencies.

 

The FDA also regulates the manufacturing facilities of our third-party manufacturers. Prior to approval, the FDA inspects manufacturing facilities to ensure compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices, or cGMP, including quality control and record-keeping measures. Post-approval, the FDA and certain state agencies subject these facilities to unannounced inspections to ensure continued compliance with cGMP. Failure to satisfy the pre-approval inspection or subsequent discovery of problems with a product, or a manufacturing or laboratory facility used by us or our collaborators, may result in an inability to receive approval, recall of products, delay in approval or restrictions on the product or on the manufacturing post-approval, including a withdrawal of the drug from the market or suspension of manufacturing.

 

We will also require foreign regulatory approval with respect to the sale of our products outside of the United States. Foreign regulatory approval processes include all of the risks associated with the FDA approval processes described above, as well as risks attributable to the satisfaction of local regulations in foreign jurisdictions. Approval by the FDA does not assure approval by foreign regulatory authorities, and the fact that clevudine has been approved by Korean regulatory authorities does not mean that the FDA will approve clevudine. Many foreign regulatory authorities have different approval and standards from those required by the

 

9


Table of Contents

FDA and may impose additional testing requirements for our product candidates. Furthermore, international ethical review boards may cause the start dates of our clinical trials to be delayed pending their review of safety data, clinical procedures, and comments provided by foreign regulatory authorities. We have had limited interaction with foreign regulatory authorities. We may not obtain foreign regulatory approvals on a timely basis, if at all. We may not be able to file for foreign regulatory approvals and may not receive necessary approvals to commercialize our existing and future product candidates in any market.

 

The regulatory approval process is expensive, and the time required to complete clinical trials and for FDA and foreign regulatory approval processes is uncertain and typically takes many years. Our analysis of data obtained from our preclinical and clinical trials is subject to confirmation and interpretation by different regulatory authorities who may have different views on the design, scope or results of our clinical trials, which could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. Changes in the regulatory approval policy during the development period of any of our product candidates, changes in, or the enactment of, additional regulations or statutes, or changes in regulatory review practices for a submitted product application may cause a delay in obtaining approval or result in the rejection of an application for regulatory approval. We could also encounter unanticipated delays or increased costs due to government regulation from future legislation or administrative action or changes in FDA or foreign regulatory policies during the period of product development, clinical trials or regulatory review.

 

As a result of the foregoing factors, our product candidates could require a significantly longer time to gain regulatory approval than expected, or may never gain approval. We cannot assure you that, even after expending substantial time and financial resources, we will obtain regulatory approval for any of our product candidates. A delay or denial of regulatory approval could delay or prevent our ability to generate product revenues and to achieve profitability. Regulatory approval, if obtained, may be made subject to limitations on the distribution of and indicated uses for which we may market a product, which could limit the size of the market for a product and adversely affect our potential product revenues.

 

Our product candidates must undergo rigorous clinical trials, the results of which are uncertain and could substantially delay or prevent us from bringing drugs to market.

 

Before we can obtain regulatory approval for a product candidate, we must undertake extensive clinical trials in humans to demonstrate safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of the FDA or other regulatory agencies. Clinical trials of new product candidates sufficient to obtain regulatory marketing approval are complex and expensive and take years to complete. In addition, the results obtained in earlier-stage testing may not be indicative of results in future trials. For example, estimates of viral load reduction and activity against HBV, HCV and HIV obtained from preclinical studies and small-scale clinical trials are not necessarily indicative of results that could be achieved in larger clinical trials. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after obtaining promising results in earlier preclinical studies and clinical trials. We cannot assure you that we will successfully complete our planned clinical trials. Our collaborators or we may experience numerous unforeseen events during, or as a result of, the clinical trial process that could delay or prevent us from receiving regulatory approval or commercializing our product candidates, including the following events:

 

   

our clinical trials may produce negative or inconclusive results, and we may decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional clinical and/or preclinical studies or to abandon programs;

 

   

trial results may not meet the level of statistical significance required by the FDA or other regulatory agencies;

 

   

we, IRBs, or regulators, may suspend or terminate clinical trials if the participating patients are being exposed to unacceptable health risks; and

 

   

the effects of our product candidates on patients may not be the desired effects or may include undesirable side effects or other characteristics that may delay or preclude regulatory approval or limit their commercial use.

 

10


Table of Contents

We have limited experience in conducting clinical trials which could impair our timing or ability to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates.

 

We have limited experience in conducting and managing the clinical trials necessary to obtain FDA approval or approval by other regulatory authorities. Our past clinical experience has been limited to a small number of drug candidates relating to a limited number of therapeutic areas. By contrast, large and established pharmaceutical companies often have staffs conducting clinical trials with multiple drug candidates across multiple indications. As a result, we may experience delays in obtaining regulatory approvals, if at all, for our product candidates for which we conduct or manage the clinical trial process.

 

Delays in clinical trials could result in increased costs to us and delay our ability to obtain regulatory approval and commercialize our product candidates.

 

Significant delays in clinical trials could materially affect our product development costs and delay regulatory approval of our product candidates. We do not know whether planned clinical trials will begin on time, will need to be redesigned or will be completed on schedule, if at all. Clinical trials can be delayed for a variety of reasons, including:

 

   

delays or failures in obtaining regulatory authorization to commence a trial because of safety concerns of regulators relating to our product candidates or similar product candidates of our competitors or failure to follow regulatory guidelines;

 

   

delays or failures in obtaining clinical materials and manufacturing sufficient quantities of the product candidate for use in trials;

 

   

delays or failures in reaching agreement on acceptable terms with prospective study sites;

 

   

delays or failures in obtaining approval of our clinical trial protocol from an institutional review board to conduct a clinical trial at a prospective study site;

 

   

delays in recruiting patients to participate in a clinical trial;

 

   

failure of our clinical trials and clinical investigators to be in compliance with the FDA’s Good Clinical Practices;

 

   

unforeseen safety issues;

 

   

inability to monitor patients adequately during or after treatment;

 

   

difficulty monitoring multiple study sites;

 

   

failure of our third-party clinical trial managers to satisfy their contractual duties, comply with regulations or meet expected deadlines; and

 

   

determination by regulators that the clinical design of the trials is not adequate.

 

Failure to recruit and enroll patients for clinical trials may cause the development of our product candidates to be delayed.

 

We have experienced, and expect to experience in the future, delays in patient enrollment in our clinical trials for a variety of reasons. The completion of clinical trials depends, among other things, on our ability to enroll a sufficient number of patients who remain in the study until its conclusion. The enrollment of patients depends on many factors, including:

 

   

the patient eligibility criteria defined in the protocol;

 

   

the size of the patient population required for analysis of the trial’s therapeutic endpoints;

 

   

the proximity of patients to study sites;

 

   

the design of the trial;

 

   

our ability to recruit clinical trial investigators with the appropriate competencies and experience;

 

11


Table of Contents
   

our ability to obtain and maintain patient consents;

 

   

the risk that patients enrolled in clinical trials will drop out of the trials before completion; and

 

   

competition for patients by clinical trial programs for other treatments.

 

Our clinical trials compete with other clinical trials for drug candidates that are in the same therapeutic areas as our drug candidates, and such competition reduces the number and types of patients available to us, because some patients who might have opted to enroll in our trials instead opt to enroll in a trial being conducted by one of our competitors. We conduct some of our clinical trials at the same clinical trial sites that some of our competitors use, which reduces the number of patients that are available for our clinical trials in such clinical trial site. Delays in patient enrollment in the future as a result of these and other factors may result in increased costs or may affect the timing or outcome of our clinical trials, which could prevent us from completing these trials and adversely affect our ability to advance the development of our product candidates.

 

For example, in our Phase 2 study of Racivir, we anticipated that enrollment would take less than one year to complete, but it actually took twenty months. The primary reasons for this unexpected delay in enrollment included competition for patients with other longer-term clinical studies, larger investigator budgets and greater payments to study subjects for other clinical trials, very specific patient enrollment criteria for our clinical study, protocol modifications that were required to increase the duration of treatment, and an increase in the number of study sites. As a results of these delays, it took us longer to complete this study than we had initially planned, and we had to commit human and financial resources to this project for an extended period that could have otherwise been allocated to other research programs.

 

Our product candidates may have undesirable side effects when used alone or in combination with other products that prevent their regulatory approval or limit their use if approved.

 

We must demonstrate the safety of our product candidates to obtain regulatory approval. Although in clinical trials to date, clevudine, Racivir and PSI-6130 were generally well tolerated, these trials involved a small number of patients and we may observe significant adverse events for these drug candidates or for R7128 in the future. With respect to DFC, on April 3, 2006, Incyte announced its decision to discontinue its development of DFC after observing an increased incidence of grade 4 hyperlipasemia in the rollover portion of a Phase 2b clinical trial. Any side effects identified in the course of our clinical trials or that may otherwise be associated with our product candidates may outweigh the benefits of our product candidates and prevent regulatory approval or limit their market acceptance if they are approved. Recent developments in the pharmaceutical industry have prompted heightened government awareness of safety reporting and pharmacovigilance. Global health authorities may impose regulatory requirements to monitor safety that may burden our ability to commercialize our drug products.

 

Even if we receive regulatory approval to market our product candidates, the market may not be receptive to our product candidates, which would negatively affect our ability to achieve profitability.

 

If approved for marketing, the commercial success of our product candidates will depend upon their acceptance by physicians and the medical community, patients, and private, government and third-party payors as clinically useful, safe and cost-effective therapeutics. The degree of market acceptance of any of our approved products will depend upon a number of factors, including:

 

   

the indication for which the product is approved, as well as its approved labeling;

 

   

the establishment and demonstration in the medical community of the safety and efficacy of our products;

 

   

the prevalence and severity of adverse side effects;

 

   

the presence of other competing approved therapies;

 

   

the potential advantages of our products over existing and future treatment methods;

 

   

the relative convenience and ease of administration of our products;

 

   

the strength of our sales, marketing and distribution support;

 

12


Table of Contents
   

the price and cost-effectiveness of the product; and

 

   

sufficient third-party reimbursement.

 

We are aware that a significant number of drug candidates are currently under development and may become available in the future for the treatment of HIV, HBV and HCV, and may be approved prior to any of our drugs coming to market. Even if our products achieve market acceptance, we may not be able to maintain that market acceptance over time if new therapeutics are introduced that are more favorably received than our products or that render our products obsolete, or if unacceptable levels of drug resistance or significant adverse events occur. If our products do not achieve and maintain market acceptance, we will not be able to generate sufficient revenue from product sales to attain profitability.

 

Even if we obtain regulatory approvals, our marketed drugs will be subject to ongoing regulatory review. If we fail to comply with continuing U.S. and foreign regulations, we could lose our marketing approvals and our business would be seriously harmed.

 

Following initial regulatory approval of any drugs we or our collaborators may develop, we and our collaborators will be subject to continuing regulatory review by the FDA or other regulatory authorities, including the review of adverse drug events and clinical results that are reported after product candidates become commercially available. This would include results from any post-marketing follow-up studies or other reporting required as a condition to approval. The manufacturing, distribution, labeling, packaging, storage, advertising, promotion, reporting and record-keeping related to the product will also be subject to extensive ongoing regulatory requirements. In addition, incidents of adverse drug reactions, unintended side effects or misuse relating to our products could result in additional regulatory controls or restrictions, or even lead to withdrawal of a product from the market.

 

Furthermore, our third-party manufacturers and the manufacturing facilities that they use to make our product candidates are regulated by the FDA. Quality control and manufacturing procedures must continue to conform to cGMP after approval. Drug and biologics manufacturers and their subcontractors are required to register their facilities and products manufactured annually with the FDA and certain state agencies and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA, state and/or other foreign authorities. Any subsequent discovery of problems with a product, or a manufacturing or laboratory facility used by us or our collaborators, may result in restrictions on the product, or on the manufacturing or laboratory facility, including a withdrawal of the drug from the market or suspension of manufacturing. In addition, any changes to an approved product, including the way it is manufactured or promoted, often require FDA approval before the product, as modified, can be marketed. We and our third-party manufacturers will also be subject to ongoing FDA requirements for submission of safety and other post-market information. If we, our collaborators or our third-party manufacturers fail to comply with applicable continuing regulatory requirements, our business could be seriously harmed because a regulatory agency may:

 

   

issue warning letters;

 

   

suspend or withdraw our regulatory approval for approved products;

 

   

seize or detain products or recommend a product recall;

 

   

refuse to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications filed by us;

 

   

suspend any of our ongoing clinical trials;

 

   

impose restrictions on our operations, including costly new manufacturing requirements;

 

   

close the facilities of our contract manufacturers; or

 

   

impose civil or criminal penalties.

 

The FDA’s policies may change and additional federal, state, local or foreign governmental regulations may be enacted that could affect our ability to maintain compliance. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature, or extent of adverse governmental regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad.

 

13


Table of Contents

Our research and development efforts may not result in additional product candidates being discovered, which could limit our ability to generate revenues in the future.

 

Our research and development efforts may not lead to the discovery of any additional product candidates that would be suitable for further preclinical or clinical development. The discovery of additional product candidates requires significant research and preclinical studies, as well as a substantial commitment of resources. Many lead compounds that appear promising in preclinical studies fail to progress to become product candidates in clinical trials. There is a great deal of uncertainty inherent in our research and development efforts and, as a consequence, in our ability to fill our drug development pipeline with promising additional product candidates.

 

We have no sales, marketing or distribution experience. We expect to develop these capabilities, and expect to invest significant amounts of financial and management resources.

 

If clevudine receives marketing approval in the United States, we intend to commercialize clevudine ourselves with a sales force of approximately 40 to 45 employees. To develop internal sales, distribution and marketing capabilities, we will have to invest significant amounts of financial and management resources. We are still evaluating whether we will develop this capability internally or outsource these function to third parties. As a result, we could face a number of risks, including:

 

   

we may not be able to attract and build a significant marketing or sales force;

 

   

the cost of establishing, training and providing regulatory oversight for a marketing or sales force may not be justifiable in light of the revenues generated by any particular product; and

 

   

our direct sales and marketing efforts may not be successful.

 

We and our collaborators will be subject to stringent federal, state and foreign regulation of sales and marketing of any approved drug candidate and a failure to comply with these regulations could result in substantial penalties.

 

The marketing and advertising of our drug products by our collaborators or us will be regulated by the FDA, certain state agencies or foreign regulatory authorities. Violations of these laws and regulations, including promotion of our products for unapproved uses or failing to disclose risk information, are punishable by criminal and civil sanctions and may result in the issuance of enforcement letters or other enforcement action by the FDA, Department of Justice, or foreign regulatory authorities that could jeopardize our ability to market the product.

 

In addition to FDA or foreign regulations, the marketing of our drug products by us or our collaborators will be regulated by federal, state or foreign laws pertaining to health care “fraud and abuse,” such as the federal anti-kickback law prohibiting bribes, kickbacks or other remuneration for the order or recommendation of items or services reimbursed by federal health care programs. Many states have similar laws applicable to items or services reimbursed by commercial insurers. Violations of these laws are punishable by criminal and civil sanctions, including, in some instances, imprisonment and exclusion from participation in federal and state health care programs, including the Medicare, Medicaid and Veterans Affairs healthcare programs. Because of the far-reaching nature of these laws, we may be required to discontinue one or more of our practices to be in compliance with these laws. Health care fraud and abuse regulations are complex, and even minor irregularities can potentially give rise to claims that a statute or prohibition has been violated. Any violations of these laws, or any action against us for violations of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

We could also become subject to false claims litigation under federal statutes, which can lead to civil money penalties, restitution, criminal fines and imprisonment, and exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal and state health care programs. These false claims statutes include the False Claims Act, which allows any person to bring a suit on behalf of the federal government alleging submission of false or fraudulent claims, or causing to present such false or fraudulent claims, under federal programs or contracts claims or other violations of the statute and to share in any amounts paid by the entity to the government in fines or settlement.

 

14


Table of Contents

These suits against pharmaceutical companies have increased significantly in volume and breadth in recent years. Some of these suits have been brought on the basis of certain sales practices promoting drug products for unapproved uses. This new growth in litigation has increased the risk that a pharmaceutical company will have to defend a false claim action, pay fines or restitution, or be excluded from the Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs and other federal and state healthcare programs as a result of an investigation arising out of such action. We may become subject to such litigation and, if we are not successful in defending against such actions, those actions may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Risks Related to Our Financial Performance and Business Operations

 

We have incurred net losses since our inception and our future profitability is uncertain and we anticipate that we will incur significant continued net losses for the next several years.

 

We are a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company with a limited operating history upon which an investor can evaluate our operations and future prospects. We have incurred net losses in each year since our inception in 1998. For the three months ended December 31, 2006, we had a net profit of $3.9 million due to a one-time milestone payment from Roche, and for the year ended September 30, 2006, we had a net loss of $11.3 million. As of December 31, 2006, we had an accumulated deficit of $46.7 million. We do not expect to generate significant revenue from our product candidates for the next several years and we expect to continue to incur significant operating losses in future periods. We expect to incur substantial costs to further our drug discovery and development programs and that our rate of spending will accelerate as a result of the increased costs and expenses associated with preclinical and clinical development, particularly when we begin Phase 3 clinical trials for clevudine, Racivir and DFC. In addition, as we establish and expand our operations in Princeton, New Jersey, we will need to continue to improve our facilities and hire additional personnel. As a result, we expect that our annual operating losses will increase significantly over the next several years.

 

Our revenue and profit potential is unproven, and our limited operating history makes our future operating results difficult to predict. To attain profitability, we and our collaborators will need to successfully develop products and effectively market and sell them. We have never generated revenue from the sale of products, and there is no guarantee that we will be able to do so in the future. If any of our drug candidates fail to show positive results in ongoing clinical trials, and we or our collaborators do not receive regulatory approval, or if our product candidates do not achieve market acceptance even if approved, we may never become profitable. If we fail to become profitable, or if we are unable to continue to fund our continuing losses, we may be unable to continue our clinical development programs, and you could lose your entire investment.

 

We will require substantial funds in addition to the net proceeds of this offering and we may be unable to raise capital when needed, which could force us to delay, reduce or eliminate some of our drug discovery, product development and commercialization activities.

 

Developing drugs, conducting clinical trials and commercializing products is expensive and we will need to raise substantial additional funds to achieve our strategic objectives. Although we believe our existing cash resources together with the net proceeds of this offering and anticipated payments under our existing collaboration agreement will be sufficient to fund our projected cash requirements for the next 18 months, we may require significant additional financing in the future to fund our operations. Such financing may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:

 

   

the progress and costs of our preclinical studies, clinical trials and other research and development activities;

 

   

the scope, prioritization and number of our clinical trials and other research and development programs;

 

   

the costs and timing of obtaining regulatory approval;

 

   

the costs of the development and expansion of our operational infrastructure;

 

   

the ability of our collaborators to achieve development milestones, marketing approval and other events or developments under our collaboration agreements;

 

15


Table of Contents
   

the amount of revenues we receive under our collaboration agreements;

 

   

the costs of filing, prosecuting, enforcing and defending patent claims and other intellectual property rights;

 

   

the costs and timing of securing manufacturing arrangements for clinical or commercial production;

 

   

the costs of establishing sales and marketing capabilities or contracting with third parties to provide these capabilities for us;

 

   

the costs of acquiring or undertaking development and commercialization efforts for any future product candidates;

 

   

the magnitude of our general and administrative expenses; and

 

   

any costs that we may incur under current and future licensing arrangements relating to our product candidates.

 

Our ability to raise additional funds will depend on financial, economic and market conditions and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Additional financing may not be available when we need it or, if available, may not be on terms that are favorable to us. If we are unable to obtain adequate funding on a timely basis, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of our drug discovery or development programs.

 

Raising additional capital may dilute our stockholders’ equity and may limit our flexibility, or require us to relinquish rights.

 

We may need to raise additional capital to fund our operations through public or private equity offerings or debt financings. To the extent that we raise additional capital by issuing equity or equity-linked securities, our stockholders’ ownership will be diluted. Any debt financing we enter into may include covenants that limit our flexibility in conducting our business. We also could be required to seek funds through arrangements with collaborators or others, which might require us to relinquish valuable rights to our intellectual property or product candidates that we would have otherwise retained.

 

Our success depends in part on our ability to retain and recruit key personnel, and if we fail to do so, it may be more difficult for us to successfully develop our products or achieve our business objectives.

 

Our success depends in part on our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified management, clinical and scientific personnel. We are highly dependent on our senior management and scientific staff, particularly P. Schaefer Price, our President and Chief Executive Officer and Kurt Leutzinger, our Chief Financial Officer. We do not maintain key man insurance for our senior management or scientific staff. The loss of the services of any of our senior management or key members of our scientific staff may significantly delay or prevent the successful completion of our clinical trials or the commercialization of our product candidates. To date, we are not aware that any member of our senior management or scientific staff plans to leave the company.

 

The employment of each of our employees with us is “at will,” and each employee can terminate his or her employment with us at any time. We currently have an employment agreement in place with P. Schaefer Price.

 

Our success will also depend on our ability to hire and retain additional qualified scientific and management personnel. Competition for qualified individuals in the pharmaceutical field is intense, and we face competition from numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, universities and other research institutions. We may be unable to attract and retain qualified individuals on acceptable terms given the competition for such personnel. For example, we encountered delays in hiring a Chief Medical Officer, since there were only a small number of qualified candidates and many of our competitors had the same or similar needs as we. Furthermore, there is a possibility that a qualified candidate we are recruiting might opt to accept a position with one of our competitors instead of with us because our competitor may have products that are already on the market and generating revenue. If we are unsuccessful in our recruiting efforts, we may be unable to execute our strategy.

 

16


Table of Contents

The requirements of being a public company may strain our administrative and operational infrastructure and will increase our operating costs.

 

As a public company, we will be subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the listing requirements of the Nasdaq Global Market,

Inc. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. In particular, we must perform system and process evaluation and testing of our internal controls over financial reporting to allow management and our auditors to assess the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting so that our independent auditors can deliver a report to us addressing these assessments. In order to comply with Section 404 we will need to incur substantial accounting expenses and expend significant management efforts.

 

We expect that the obligations of being a public company will require significant additional expenditures by placing additional demands on our management, administrative, operational, internal audit and accounting resources as we comply with the reporting requirements of a public company. If we are unable to accomplish our objectives in a timely and effective manner, our ability to comply with the rules that apply to public companies could be impaired. We will also need to upgrade our systems, implement additional financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures, expand our internal audit function, and hire additional accounting, audit and financial staff with appropriate public company experience and technical accounting knowledge, which will increase our general and administrative expenses and capital expenditures. The rules and any related regulations that may be proposed in the future that are applicable to public companies may make it more difficult and more costly for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher premiums to obtain the same or similar coverage. We cannot predict or estimate the amount or timing of the additional costs we may incur as a result of the reporting requirements applicable to public companies, but we expect our operating results will be adversely affected by the costs of operating as a public company.

 

Our auditors identified a material weakness in connection with the audits of our financial statements which, unless remedied, could have a material adverse effect on our external financial reporting.

 

In connection with the audits of our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and the year ended September 30, 2006, we and our auditors concluded that we did not maintain effective controls over the timely identification, evaluation and accurate resolution of non-routine and complex accounting matters, specifically related to equity and revenue transactions, and over the process of including complete and appropriate presentation of items required by GAAP in the financial statements and notes thereto. In our judgment and the judgment of our auditors, this constituted a material weakness in our internal controls under the Standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. We intend to remedy this material weakness by hiring a financial reporting specialist and engaging an outside accounting firm other than our auditors to act as consultants in the preparation of external financial reports. Any failure to achieve and maintain effective control over financial reporting could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and could require that we restate our financial statements for prior periods, any of which could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and cause a decline, which could be material, in the trading price of our common stock.

 

We will need to increase the size of our organization, and we may encounter difficulties managing our growth.

 

As of December 31, 2006, we had 32 employees, 22 of whom performed research and development functions. We plan to hire a significant number of additional employees in the future. For example, we expect to hire 20 to 30 employees within one year of our initial public offering and plan to hire several additional employees as required each year to add depth and specialized expertise to our scientific and management team. In addition, we have identified the need to hire a person who will have senior management responsibility for external financial reporting in order to meet the accounting and reporting requirements of a public company. We

 

17


Table of Contents

expect that this substantial growth will place a strain on our administrative and operational infrastructure. If the product candidates that we are developing continue to advance in clinical trials, we will need to expand our development, regulatory, manufacturing, quality, marketing and sales capabilities or contract with third parties to provide these capabilities for us. As our operations expand, we expect that we will need to develop additional relationships with various collaborators, contract research organizations, suppliers, manufacturers and other organizations. We may not be able to establish such relationships or may incur significant costs to do so. Our ability to manage our growth will also require us to continue to improve our operational, financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures, which will further increase our operating costs. If we are unable to successfully manage the expansion of our operations or operate on a larger scale, we will not achieve our strategic objectives.

 

Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties

 

We have licensed PSI-6130 and its pro-drugs, including R7128, to Roche, and we will depend on Roche to continue its development and commercialization.

 

We are developing R7128 under a collaborative licensing agreement that we entered into with Roche in October 2004. We are dependent on Roche to continue the development of R7128 and successfully commercialize it. Roche may terminate its agreement with us without cause on six months’ notice. If Roche fails to aggressively pursue the development and marketing approval of R7128, or if a dispute arises with Roche over the terms or the interpretation of the collaboration agreement or an alleged breach of any provision of the agreement, or if Roche terminates its agreement, then the development and commercialization of R7128, or our ability to receive the expected payments under this agreement, could be delayed or adversely affected.

 

Roche is subject to many of the same development and commercialization risks to which we are subject. If Roche decides to devote resources to alternative products, either on its own or in collaboration with other pharmaceutical companies, Roche may not devote sufficient resources to the development of R7128. Further, if Roche decides to pursue additional therapies for the diseases these product candidates target, future sales of R7128 could be adversely affected. We are aware that Roche has an internal program to develop another molecule, known as R1626, as a treatment for HCV. Both R7128 and R1626 act as inhibitors of the HCV RNA polymerase. Any adverse development in Roche’s operations or financial condition could adversely affect the development and commercialization of R7128 or other pro-drugs of PSI-6130, and our receipt of future milestone payments and royalties on its sales.

 

We and our collaborators depend on third parties to conduct our clinical trials, which may result in costs and delays that prevent us from obtaining regulatory approval or successfully commercializing our product candidates.

 

We and our collaborators engage clinical investigators and medical institutions to enroll patients in our clinical trials and contract research organizations to perform data collection and analysis and other aspects of our preclinical studies and clinical trials. As a result, we depend on these clinical investigators, medical institutions and contract research organizations to perform these activities on a timely basis in accordance with the protocol, good laboratory practices, good clinical trial practices, and other regulatory requirements. Our reliance on these third parties for clinical development activities reduces our control over these activities. Accordingly, if these parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations or meet expected deadlines, or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinical protocols or for other reasons, our clinical trials may be extended, delayed, terminated or our data may be rejected by the FDA. If it became necessary to replace a third party that was conducting one of our clinical trials, we believe that there are a number of other third-party contractors whom we could engage to continue these activities, although it may result in a delay of the applicable clinical trial. If there are delays in testing or obtaining regulatory approvals as a result of a third party’s failure to perform, our drug discovery and development costs will increase, and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or successfully commercialize our product candidates.

 

18


Table of Contents

If parties on whom we rely to manufacture our products or product candidates do not manufacture the active pharmaceutical ingredients or finished products of satisfactory quality, in a timely manner, in sufficient quantities or at an acceptable cost, clinical development and commercialization of our product candidates could be delayed.

 

We do not currently own or operate manufacturing facilities; consequently, we rely on third parties as sole suppliers of clinical investigational quantities of our product candidates. We do not expect to establish our own manufacturing facilities and we will continue to rely on third-party manufacturers to produce commercial quantities of any drugs that we market. Our current and anticipated future dependence on third parties for the manufacture of our product candidates may adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize any product candidates on a timely and competitive basis.

 

To date, our product candidates have only been manufactured in quantities sufficient for preclinical studies or initial clinical trials. We do not currently have any long-term supply agreements in place for our product candidates and will need to enter into supply agreements for additional supplies of each of our product candidates to complete clinical development. Additionally, in connection with our application for commercial approvals and if any product candidate is approved by the FDA or other regulatory agencies for commercial sale, we will need to procure commercial quantities from qualified third-party manufacturers. We may not be able to contract for increased manufacturing capacity for any of our product candidates in a timely or economic manner or at all. A significant scale-up in manufacturing may require additional validation studies. If we are unable to successfully increase the manufacturing capacity for a product candidate, the regulatory approval or commercial launch of that product candidate may be delayed, or there may be a shortage of supply, which could limit our sales.

 

Other risks associated with our reliance on contract manufacturers include the following:

 

   

Contract manufacturers may encounter difficulties in achieving volume production, quality control, and quality assurance and also may experience shortages in qualified personnel and obtaining active ingredients for our products.

 

   

If we need to change manufacturers, the FDA and corresponding foreign regulatory agencies must approve these manufacturers in advance. This would involve pre-approval inspections to ensure compliance with FDA and foreign regulations and standards.

 

   

Contract manufacturers are subject to ongoing periodic, unannounced inspection by the FDA and corresponding state and foreign agencies or their designees to ensure strict compliance with cGMP and other governmental regulations and corresponding foreign standards. We do not have control over compliance by our contract manufacturers with these regulations and standards. Our present or future contract manufacturers may not be able to comply with cGMP and other FDA requirements or other regulatory requirements outside the United States. Failure of contract manufacturers to comply with applicable regulations could result in delays, suspensions or withdrawal of approvals, seizures or recalls of product candidates and operating restrictions, any of which could significantly and adversely affect our business.

 

   

Contract manufacturers may breach the manufacturing agreements that we or our development partners have with them because of factors beyond our control or may terminate or fail to renew a manufacturing agreement based on their own business priorities at a time that is costly or inconvenient to us.

 

Changes to the manufacturing process during or following the completion of clinical trials also require sponsors to demonstrate to the FDA that the product manufactured under the new conditions comply with cGMP requirements. This requirement applies to moving manufacturing functions to another facility. In each phase of investigation, sufficient information about changes in the manufacturing process must be submitted to the FDA.

 

19


Table of Contents

We may experience difficulties in entering into contracts on favorable terms for supplies of our products for future preclinical studies and clinical trials, which could prevent us from completing these studies and delay the commercialization of our products.

 

We will need to enter into supply agreements for additional supplies of each of our product candidates to complete clinical development and/or commercialize them. We cannot assure you that we will be able to do so on favorable terms, if at all. We do not have a sufficient quantity of clevudine for our planned Phase 3 clinical trials, and we will need to procure additional supplies of clevudine to complete those trials. We are negotiating an agreement for the manufacture of clevudine with a supplier that manufactured clevudine used in previous clinical trials, however, our negotiations are ongoing and we have not entered into a definitive agreement with this potential supplier. If we fail to negotiate a definitive agreement with this supplier or another supplier or if this manufacturer experiences any delay in manufacturing the necessary clinical supply of clevudine, the completion of our Phase 3 program would be delayed. If we obtain marketing approval for clevudine, we will need to procure additional commercial supplies of clevudine from qualified third-party manufacturers.

 

We will need to procure additional supplies of R7128 to complete our future preclinical studies and clinical trials. Roche is supplying R7128 for our current preclinical studies and clinical trials. We are currently in the process of identifying and evaluating the qualifications of a potential second supplier that could manufacture R7128.

 

We will need to procure additional supplies of Racivir to complete our future preclinical studies and clinical trials. We are currently in the process of identifying and evaluating the qualifications of potential suppliers that could manufacture Racivir, including the company that manufactured our current supply of Racivir; however, we have not yet entered into a definitive supply agreement with any company.

 

Incyte was responsible for the clinical trials of DFC and for obtaining sufficient supply of DFC for its trials. If we conduct our own clinical trials of DFC, we will need to establish our own source of supply of DFC.

 

We will need to enter into supply agreements for additional supplies of each of our product candidates to complete clinical development and/or commercialize them. We cannot assure you that we will be able to do so on favorable terms, if at all.

 

If conflicts arise between our collaborators and us, our collaborators may act in their best interest and not in our best interest, which could adversely affect our business.

 

Conflicts may arise with our collaborators if they pursue alternative therapies for the diseases that we have targeted or develop alternative products either on their own or in collaboration with others. Competing products, either developed by our collaborators or any future collaborators or to which our present collaborators or any future collaborators have rights, may result in development delays or the withdrawal of their support for our product candidates.

 

Additionally, conflicts may arise if there is a dispute about the achievement and payment of a milestone amount or the ownership of intellectual property that is developed during the course of the collaborative arrangement. Similarly, the parties to a collaboration agreement may disagree as to which party owns newly developed products. Should an agreement be terminated as a result of a dispute and before we have realized the benefits of the collaboration, our reputation could be harmed and we might not obtain revenues that we anticipated receiving.

 

20


Table of Contents

We may rely on other collaborators in the future and if future collaborations are not successful, we may not be able to effectively develop and commercialize our product candidates.

 

We may decide to enter into future collaboration agreements for the development and commercialization of clevudine, Racivir or other product candidates that we may identify in the future. We may not be successful in entering into any additional collaborative arrangements.

 

Relying on collaborative relationships poses a number of risks to us, including the following:

 

   

we may be required to relinquish important rights, including intellectual property, marketing and distribution rights;

 

   

we will not be able to control whether our collaborators will devote sufficient resources to the development or commercialization of the product candidates we license;

 

   

we will not have access to all information regarding the products being developed and commercialized by our collaborators, including information about clinical trial design and execution, regulatory affairs, process development, manufacturing, marketing and other areas known by our collaborators. Thus, our ability to keep our stockholders informed about the status of our collaborated products will be limited by the degree to which our collaborators keep us informed;

 

   

business combinations or significant changes in a collaborator’s business strategy may also adversely affect a collaborator’s willingness to actively pursue the development and commercialization of any products resulting from a collaboration;

 

   

a collaborator may separately move forward with a competing product candidate either developed independently or in collaboration with others, including our competitors;

 

   

collaborators with marketing rights may choose to devote fewer resources to the marketing of our products than they do to other products they are selling;

 

   

our collaborators may experience financial difficulties and may be unable to fund the clinical trials, fulfill their obligations under collaboration agreements with us or delay paying us agreed-upon milestone payments, reimbursements, royalties or other committed amounts; and

 

   

disputes may arise between us and our collaborators delaying or terminating the research, development or commercialization of our drug candidates, resulting in litigation or arbitration that could be time-consuming and expensive.

 

A collaborator may terminate its agreement with us or simultaneously pursue alternative products, therapeutic approaches or technologies as a means of developing treatments for the diseases targeted by us or our collaborative effort or us. If a partner terminates its agreement, the development or commercialization of our products could be delayed or terminated, or we could be required to undertake unforeseen additional responsibilities or devote unbudgeted additional resources to such development or commercialization.

 

If we fail to enter into additional in-licensing agreements or if these arrangements are unsuccessful, our ability to fill our clinical pipeline may be adversely affected.

 

In addition to entering into collaborative agreements with third parties for the development and commercialization of our product candidates, we intend to continue to explore opportunities to further enhance our discovery and development capabilities and develop our clinical pipeline by in-licensing product candidates that fit within our expertise and research and development capabilities. We will face substantial competition for in-licensing opportunities from companies focused on antiviral therapies, many of which may have greater resources than we do. Additional in-licensing agreements for product candidates may not be available to us, or if available, the terms may not be favorable. We may also need to license additional technologies in order to continue to develop our clinical pipeline. If we are unable to enter into additional agreements to license product

 

21


Table of Contents

candidates or technologies, or if these arrangements are unsuccessful, our clinical pipeline may not contain a

sufficient number of promising future product candidates and our research and development efforts could be delayed.

 

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

 

We licensed Racivir, one of our lead product candidates, from Emory University, and our rights to commercialize Racivir are subject to a right of first refusal held by Gilead, and uncertainties related to these rights may result in our being prevented from obtaining the expected economic benefits from developing Racivir.

 

We licensed Racivir from Emory University pursuant to an exclusive, worldwide license agreement to make, have made, use, import, offer for sale and sell Racivir, which we entered into in 1998, referred to as the Racivir License Agreement. In a license agreement relating to emtricitabine that Emory University entered into with Triangle Pharmaceuticals, now Gilead Sciences, Inc., or Gilead, in 1996, which we refer to as the Emory/Gilead License Agreement, Emory University previously had granted a right of first refusal to Gilead that is applicable to any license or assignment relating to a specified range of mixtures of (–) – FTC and (+) – FTC, referred to as enriched FTC (which includes Racivir). The terms of this right of first refusal contains an exception permitting Emory University to license or assign its rights in respect of enriched FTC to a permitted transferee, which includes any of the inventors (which included two of our founders) or to any corporate entity formed by or on behalf of the inventors for purposes of clinically developing enriched FTC so long as the licensee agrees in writing to be bound by the terms of Gilead’s right of first refusal to the same extent as Emory University. Our license to Racivir was granted to us by Emory University pursuant to this exception and therefore we are bound by the terms of Gilead’s right of first refusal to the same extent as Emory University. The terms of this right of first refusal as set forth in the Emory/Gilead License Agreement require that, prior to the entry into any license or assignment agreement with a third party relating to any of Emory University’s rights in respect of enriched FTC, Emory University shall notify Gilead of the terms of the proposed agreement and provide a copy of the proposed agreement to Gilead together with all data and information in Emory University’s possession relating to enriched FTC and its use as a therapeutic agent. Gilead has 30 days to accept or decline the offer. Although Emory University considers Pharmasset to be a permitted transferee under the Emory/Gilead License Agreement, Emory University has subsequently taken the position that its grant of commercialization rights (i.e., the rights to offer for sale and sell Racivir) to us exceeded the rights that were permitted to be granted to a permitted transferee under its agreement with Gilead. While we believe that Gilead is aware of the Racivir license agreement through both Pharmasset’s and Emory University’s communications with Gilead, Gilead has not contacted us regarding its interpretation of the terms of the Racivir License Agreement.

 

In March 2004, we entered into a supplemental agreement with Emory University in which we and Emory University agreed that, prior to any commercialization of enriched FTC by us, or by any licensee or assignee of our rights under the Racivir License Agreement, we and Emory University would adhere strictly to the terms of the right of first refusal granted to Gilead in the Emory/Gilead License Agreement and offer to Gilead the same terms and conditions under which we, our licensee or our assignee, propose to commercialize enriched FTC. The supplemental agreement also outlines a procedure by which Emory University and we would jointly offer the terms of a proposed license and commercialization agreement between us and a third party to Gilead after Emory University has the opportunity to approve them. Therefore, before we could enter into a commercialization agreement for Racivir with a third party or commercialize Racivir on our own, we would be required to offer Gilead the opportunity to be our commercialization partner on the same terms on which we intend, or our prospective partner intends, to commercialize Racivir. It is uncertain whether a third party would be willing to negotiate the terms of a commercialization agreement with us knowing that Gilead can take their place as licensee by accepting the negotiated terms and exercising its right of first refusal.

 

These uncertainties related to our commercialization rights may result in our being prevented from obtaining the expected economic benefits from developing Racivir. In addition, we could become involved in litigation or arbitration related to our commercialization rights to Racivir in the future.

 

22


Table of Contents

If we are unable to obtain and maintain adequate patent protection for our product candidates, we may be unable to commercialize our product candidates or to prevent other companies from using our intellectual property in competitive products in certain countries.

 

Our commercial success will depend, in large part, on our ability and the ability of our licensors to obtain and maintain patents and proprietary intellectual property rights sufficient to prevent others from marketing our product candidates, as well as to successfully defend and enforce those patents against infringement and to avoid infringing the proprietary rights of others, both in the United States and in foreign countries. We have filed or may in the future file our own patent applications, and we have also licensed certain patents, patent applications and other proprietary rights from third parties. We have licensed patents for clevudine, Racivir and DFC. The patent covering the composition of matter for clevudine that we have licensed from Bukwang is scheduled to expire in January 2014. The patent covering the composition of matter for Racivir that we have licensed from Emory University is scheduled to expire in September 2015. The patent covering methods of using DFC to treat HIV that we have licensed from Emory University is scheduled to expire in January 2015. The patent expiration dates stated above do not take into account any patent term adjustments that may accrue due to procedural delays by the United States Patent and Trademark Office or patent term extensions that may accrue due to regulatory delays.

 

Our patent position, like that of many pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, is uncertain and involves complex legal and factual questions for which important legal principles are unresolved. We may not develop or obtain rights to products or processes that are patentable. Even if we do obtain patents, such patents may not adequately protect the products or technologies we own or have licensed. In addition, we generally do not control the patent prosecution of subject matter that we license from others. Generally, the patent holders are primarily responsible for the patent prosecution and maintenance activities pertaining to the licensed patent applications and patents, while we are afforded opportunities to advise the primary licensors on such activities with respect to our licensed territories. Accordingly, we are unable to exercise the same degree of control over this intellectual property as we would over our own. Others may challenge, seek to invalidate, infringe or circumvent any patents we own or license, and rights we receive under those patents may not provide competitive advantages to us. We cannot assure you as to the degree of protection that we will be afforded by any patents issued to, or licensed by, us. The laws of many countries may not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as U.S. laws, and those countries may lack adequate rules and procedures for defending our intellectual property rights. For example, we may not be able to prevent a third party from infringing our patents in a country that does not recognize or enforce patent rights, or that imposes compulsory licenses on or restricts the prices of life-saving drugs. Changes in either patent laws or in interpretations of patent laws in the United States and other countries may diminish the value of our intellectual property.

 

The degree of future protection for our proprietary rights is uncertain because legal means afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep our competitive advantage. For example:

 

   

we or our licensors might not have been the first to make the inventions covered by each of our or our licensors’ pending patent applications and issued patents, and we may have to participate in expensive and protracted interference proceedings to determine priority of invention;

 

   

we or our licensors might not have been the first to file patent applications for these inventions;

 

   

our or our licensors’ pending patent applications may not result in issued patents;

 

   

our or our licensors’ issued patents may not provide a basis for commercially viable products or may not provide us with any competitive advantages or may be challenged by third parties;

 

   

others may design around our or our licensors’ patent claims to produce competitive products which fall outside the scope of our or our licensors’ patents; or

 

   

the patents of others may prevent us from marketing one or more of our product candidates for one or more indications that may be valuable to our business strategy.

 

23


Table of Contents

An issued patent does not guarantee us the right to practice the patented technology or commercialize the patented product. Third parties may have or obtain rights to blocking patents that could be used to prevent us from commercializing our patented products and practicing our patented technology. Our issued patents and those that may be issued in the future may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, which could limit our ability to prevent competitors from marketing related product candidates or could limit the length of the term of patent protection of our product candidates. In addition, the rights granted under any issued patents may not provide us with proprietary protection or competitive advantages against competitors with similar technology and our competitors may independently develop similar technologies. Moreover, because of the extensive time required for development, testing and regulatory review of a potential product, it is possible that, before any of our product candidates can be commercialized, any related patent or potential patent extension may expire or remain in force for only a short period following commercialization, thereby reducing any advantage of the patent.

 

We may incur substantial costs or lose important rights as a result of litigation or other proceedings relating to patent and other intellectual property rights.

 

The defense and prosecution of intellectual property rights, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office interference proceedings and related legal and administrative proceedings in the United States and elsewhere are costly and time-consuming and their outcome is uncertain. In general, there is a substantial amount of litigation involving patent and other intellectual property rights in the biopharmaceutical industry. Litigation may be necessary to:

 

   

assert or defend claims of infringement;

 

   

enforce patents we own or license;

 

   

protect trade secrets; or

 

   

determine the enforceability, scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others.

 

If we become involved in any litigation, interference or other administrative proceedings, we will incur substantial expense and it will divert the efforts of our scientific and management personnel. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of litigation, interference or other administrative proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace pending resolution of the disputed matters. An adverse determination may subject us to significant liabilities or require us to seek licenses that may not be available from third parties on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. We or our collaborators may be restricted or prevented from developing and commercializing our products in the event of an adverse determination in a judicial or administrative proceeding or if we fail to obtain necessary licenses. In such event, we may attempt to redesign our processes or technologies so that they do not infringe, which may not be possible.

 

While our product candidates are in clinical trials, we believe that the use of our product candidates in these clinical trials falls within the scope of the exemptions provided by 35 U.S.C. Section 271(e) in the United States, which exempts from patent infringement liability activities reasonably related to the development and submission of information to the FDA. As our product candidates progress toward commercialization, the possibility of a patent infringement claim against us increases. We attempt to ensure that our product candidates and the methods we employ to manufacture them, as well as the methods for their use we intend to promote, do not infringe other parties’ patents and other proprietary rights. There can be no assurance they do not, however, and competitors or other parties may assert that we infringe their proprietary rights in any event.

 

If we find during clinical evaluation that our product candidates for the treatment of HIV, HBV or HCV should be used in combination with a product that is covered by a patent held by another company or institution, and that a labeling instruction is required in product packaging recommending that combination, we could be accused of, or held liable for, infringement of the third-party patents covering the product recommended for co-administration with our product. In such a case, we could be required to obtain a license from the other company or institution to use the required or desired package labeling, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

 

24


Table of Contents

We may be subject to claims that our board members, employees or consultants or we have used or disclosed alleged trade secrets or other proprietary information belonging to third parties, and any such individuals that are currently affiliated with one of our competitors may disclose our proprietary technology or information.

 

As is commonplace in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, some of our board members, employees and consultants are or have been employed at, or associated with, other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies that compete with us. For example, two of our directors were also members of the board of directors of Idenix Pharmaceuticals; one of our directors is a member of the board of directors of Arrow Therapeutics, Ltd., a private pharmaceutical company; and another of our directors was a former executive at Gilead Sciences. These companies are focused on the same therapeutic areas as us. From time to time, these directors may face conflicts of interest because of their affiliation with companies with which we may compete. While employed at or associated with these companies, these board members may have been exposed to or involved in research and technology similar to the areas of research and technology in which we are engaged. We may be subject to claims that we, or our employees, board members or consultants, have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed alleged trade secrets or other proprietary information of those companies. Litigation may be necessary to defend against such claims.

 

While we expect to enter into confidentiality agreements with all of our employees prior to the completion of this offering, we have not yet completed this process. As of January 1, 2007, approximately half of our employees, including members of our senior management and our scientific staff, had not yet entered into confidentiality agreements with us. Additionally, we do not have, and are not planning to enter into, any confidentiality agreements with our directors. There is the possibility that any of our former board members, employees or consultants who are currently employed at, or associated with, one of our competitors may unintentionally or willfully disclose our proprietary technology or information.

 

The rights we rely upon to protect our unpatented trade secrets may be inadequate.

 

We rely on unpatented trade secrets, know-how and technology, which are difficult to protect, especially in the pharmaceutical industry, where much of the information about a product must be made public during the regulatory approval process. We seek to protect trade secrets, in part, by entering into confidentiality agreements with employees, consultants and others. These parties may breach or terminate these agreements, and we may not have adequate remedies for such breaches. Furthermore, these agreements may not provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets or other proprietary information or result in the effective assignment to us of intellectual property, and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of confidential information or other breaches of the agreements. Despite our efforts to protect our trade secrets, we or our collaboration partners, board members, employees, consultants, contractors or scientific and other advisors may unintentionally or willfully disclose our proprietary information to competitors.

 

There is a risk that our trade secrets could have been, or could, in the future, be shared by any of our former employees with and be used to the benefit of any company that competes with us. For example, a former director and founder of Pharmasset has, along with several of our former scientists, started a new pharmaceutical company to develop drugs to treat viral infections (including human retroviral and hepatitis infections), cancer and dermatological products, which may compete with us in the future. These individuals left Pharmasset in 2005. We have a confidentiality agreement in place with our former director, and have both confidentiality agreements and covenant not to compete agreements in place with the former scientists. The term of the confidentiality agreements is indefinite with regard to any confidential information that is not subsequently made public. The covenant not to compete agreements expired on February 28, 2007.

 

If we fail to maintain trade secret protection, our competitive position may be adversely affected. Competitors may also independently discover our trade secrets. Enforcement of claims that a third party has illegally obtained and is using trade secrets is expensive, time consuming and uncertain. If our competitors independently develop equivalent knowledge, methods and know-how, we would not be able to assert our trade secrets against them and our business could be harmed.

 

25


Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Industry

 

Our industry is extremely competitive. If our competitors are able to develop and market products that are more effective, safer or more affordable than ours, or obtain marketing approval before we do, our commercial opportunities may be limited.

 

Competition in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries is intense and continues to increase, particularly in the area of antiviral drugs. Many companies are pursuing the development of novel drugs that target the same diseases we are targeting. There are a significant number of drugs that are approved or currently under development that will become available in the future for the treatment of HBV, HCV and HIV and other viral infections. If any of the product candidates that our competitors are developing are successful, we will have difficulty gaining market share.

 

We face a broad range of current and potential competitors, from established global pharmaceutical companies with significant resources to development-stage companies. Listed below are some of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies developing compounds targeting HBV, HCV and HIV and other viral infections.

 

   

HBV: Competitors with late-stage development programs for the treatment of HBV include Gilead Sciences, whose lead drug candidate has advanced into Phase 3 clinical trials. Our HBV product candidate may compete directly or be used in combination with the current standard of care, with the drug candidates that are currently in development and with those that may be developed in the future.

 

   

HCV: Roche, Schering-Plough, and several generic manufacturers market ribavirin, which is a component of the current standard of care for HCV. Roche and other companies, such as Valeant Pharmaceuticals International and Idenix, are also developing new drugs for the treatment of HCV.

 

   

HIV: Pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer Inc. and Merck & Co., Inc., and biotechnology companies such as Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Human Genome Sciences, Inc. are developing compounds targeting HIV. We also believe that a significant number of drugs are currently under development and will become available in the future for the treatment of HIV. In addition, we are aware that Merck and other companies are pursuing the development of a prophylactic vaccine, which would prevent infections. If a prophylactic vaccine is successful, it could reduce the size of the market for our products.

 

In addition, we face competition from academic and research institutions and government agencies for the discovery, development and commercialization of novel therapeutics to treat HIV, HBV and HCV. Some early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies.

 

Many of our competitors have:

 

   

significantly greater financial, technical and human resources than we have and may be better equipped to develop, manufacture and market products;

 

   

more extensive experience in preclinical studies and clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and manufacturing and marketing products; and

 

   

products that have already been approved or are in the late stage of development and operate large, well-funded research and development programs.

 

Our competitors may succeed in developing or commercializing more effective, safer or more affordable products, which would render our product candidates less competitive or noncompetitive. Our competitors may discover technologies and techniques, or enter into partnerships with collaborators, in order to develop competing products that are more effective or less costly than the products we develop. This may render our technology or products obsolete and noncompetitive. These competitors also compete with us to recruit and retain qualified scientific and management personnel, establish clinical trials sites and patient registration for clinical trials, as

 

26


Table of Contents

well as to acquire technologies and technology licenses complementary to our programs or advantageous to our business. Moreover, competitors that are able to achieve patent protection, obtain regulatory approvals and commence commercial sales of their products before we do, and competitors who have already done so, will enjoy a significant competitive advantage. If we are not able to compete effectively against our current and future competitors, our business will not grow and our financial condition and operations will suffer.

 

If we successfully develop and obtain approval for our product candidates, we will face competition for market share based on the safety and efficacy of our products, the timing and scope of regulatory approvals, the availability of supply, marketing and sales capability, reimbursement coverage, price, patent position and other factors.

 

If third-party payors do not adequately reimburse patients for any of our product candidates, if approved for marketing, we may not be successful in selling them.

 

Our ability to commercialize any products successfully will depend in part on the extent to which reimbursement will be available from governmental and other third-party payors, both in the United States and in foreign markets. Even if we succeed in bringing one or more products to the market, the amount reimbursed for our products may be insufficient to allow our products to compete effectively with products that are reimbursed at a higher level. If the price we are able to charge for any products we develop is inadequate in light of our development costs, our profitability could be adversely affected.

 

Reimbursement by governmental and other third-party payors may depend upon a number of factors, including the governmental and other third-party payor’s determination that the use of a product is:

 

   

a covered benefit under its health plan or part of their formulary;

 

   

safe, effective and medically necessary;

 

   

appropriate for the specific patient;

 

   

cost-effective; and

 

   

neither experimental nor investigational.

 

Obtaining reimbursement approval for a product from each third-party and government payor is a time-consuming and costly process that could require us to provide supporting scientific, clinical and cost-effectiveness data for the use of our products to each payor. We may not be able to provide data sufficient to obtain reimbursement.

 

Eligibility for coverage does not imply that any drug product will be reimbursed in all cases or at a rate that allows us to make a profit. Interim payments for new products, if applicable, may also not be sufficient to cover our costs and may not become permanent. Reimbursement rates may vary according to the use of the drug and the clinical setting in which it is used, may be based on payments allowed for lower-cost drugs that are already reimbursed, may be incorporated into existing payments for other products or services, and may reflect budgetary constraints and/or Medicare or Medicaid data used to calculate these rates. Net prices for products also may be reduced by mandatory discounts or rebates required by government health care programs or by any future relaxation of laws that restrict imports of certain medical products from countries where they may be sold at lower prices than in the United States.

 

The health care industry is experiencing a trend toward containing or reducing costs through various means, including lowering reimbursement rates, limiting therapeutic class coverage and negotiating reduced payment schedules with service providers for drug products. The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, or the MMA, created a broader prescription drug benefit for Medicare beneficiaries. The MMA also contains provisions intended to reduce or eliminate delays in the introduction of generic drug competition at the end of patent or nonpatent market exclusivity. The impact of the MMA on drug prices and new drug utilization over the next several years is unknown. The MMA also made adjustments to the physician

 

27


Table of Contents

fee schedule and the measure by which prescription drugs are presently paid. The effects of these changes are unknown but may include decreased utilization of new medicines in physician prescribing patterns, and further pressure on drug company sponsors to provide discount programs and reimbursement support programs. There have been, and we expect that there will continue to be, federal and state proposals to constrain expenditures for medical products and services, which may affect reimbursement levels for our future products. In addition, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services frequently change product descriptors, coverage policies, product and service codes, payment methodologies and reimbursement values. Third-party payors often follow Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own reimbursement rates and may have sufficient market power to demand significant price reductions. Future legislation may also limit the prices that can be charged for drugs we develop.

 

Foreign governments tend to impose strict price controls, which may adversely affect our future profitability.

 

In most foreign countries, particularly in the European Union, prescription drug pricing and/or reimbursement is subject to governmental control. In these countries, pricing negotiations with governmental authorities can take considerable time after the receipt of marketing approval for a product. To obtain reimbursement or pricing approval in some countries, we may be required to conduct a clinical trial that compares the cost-effectiveness of our product candidate to other available therapies. If reimbursement of our products is unavailable or limited in scope or amount, or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels, our profitability will be negatively affected.

 

Even if we achieve market acceptance for our products, we may experience downward pricing pressure on the price of our drugs because of generic competition and social pressure to lower the cost of drugs to treat HIV, HBV and HCV.

 

Several of the FDA-approved individual and combination products face patent expiration in the next several years. The following table lists expected patent expiration dates of FDA-approved individual and combination products the patents for which are expected to expire in the next several years and that we expect may compete with our product candidates, according the FDA’s compilation of patents covering approved drug products in a collection entitled “Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations” (known universally as the “Orange Book”).

 

Drug Brand Name


  

Patent Expiry Date or
Range of Patent Expiry Dates*


Epivir-HBV

   November 17, 2009 to May 18, 2016

Hepsera

   April 21, 2006 to July 23, 2018

Baraclude

   October 18, 2010

Epivir

   November 17, 2009 to May 18, 2016

Emtriva

   May 11, 2010 to March 9, 2021

Zerit

   June 24, 2008

Videx

   August 29, 2006 to July 22, 2011

Ziagen

   December 18, 2011 to May 14, 2018

Hivid

   November 7, 2006 to July 2, 2008

Combivir

   September 17, 2005 to May 18, 2016

Truvada

   May 11, 2010 to March 9, 2021

Atripla

   May 11, 2010 to March 9, 2021

Epzicom

   December 18, 2011 to May 14, 2018

Trizivir

   September 17, 2005 to May 14, 2018

Tyzeka

   August 10, 2019

*   These dates do not take into account any patent term adjustments that may accrue due to procedural delays by the United States Patent and Trademark Office or patent term extensions that may accrue due to regulatory delays nor any exclusivity periods granted by the FDA.

 

28


Table of Contents

As a result, generic versions of these drugs may become available. We expect to face competition from these generic drugs, including price-based competition.

 

Pressure from AIDS awareness and other social activist groups to reduce HIV drug prices may also put downward pressure on the prices of HIV drugs, including Racivir and DFC if they are commercialized. Similar trends of generic competition or social pressure may occur for HBV or HCV, which would result in downward pressure on the price for clevudine or R7128, if they are commercialized.

 

We face a risk of product liability claims and if we are not able to obtain adequate liability insurance, a product liability claim could result in substantial liabilities.

 

Our business exposes us to the risk of significant potential product liability claims that are inherent in the manufacturing, testing and marketing of human therapeutic products, and we will face an even greater risk if our collaborators or we sell any products commercially. Regardless of their merit or eventual outcome, product liability claims may result in:

 

   

delay or failure to complete our clinical trials;

 

   

withdrawal of clinical trial participants and difficulty in recruiting participants;

 

   

inability to commercialize our product candidates;

 

   

decreased demand for our product candidates;

 

   

injury to our reputation;

 

   

inability to establish new collaborations;

 

   

litigation costs;

 

   

substantial monetary awards against us; and

 

   

diversion of management or other resources from key aspects of our operations.

 

Product liability claims could result in an FDA investigation of the safety or efficacy of our products, our manufacturing processes and facilities or our marketing programs. An FDA investigation could also potentially lead to a recall of our products or more serious enforcement actions, limitations on the indications for which they may be used, or suspension or withdrawal of approval.

 

We currently have product liability insurance that covers our clinical trials up to a $5.0 million annual aggregate limit, subject to deductibles and coverage limitations. We intend to increase our insurance coverage for future clinical trials and to include the sale of commercial products if marketing approval is obtained. Because insurance coverage is becoming increasingly expensive, we may not be able to obtain or maintain adequate protection against potential product liabilities at a reasonable cost or at all, and the insurance coverage that we obtain may not be adequate to cover potential claims or losses.

 

We may incur significant costs to comply with laws regulating the protection of health and human safety and the environment, and failure to comply with these laws and regulations could expose us to significant liabilities.

 

Our research and development activities involve the controlled use of numerous hazardous materials, chemicals and radioactive materials and produce waste products. We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations, and may be subject to foreign laws and regulations, governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of hazardous materials and waste products, including certain regulations promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA. The EPA regulations to which we are subject require that we register with the EPA as a generator of hazardous waste. The risk of accidental contamination or injury from the

 

29


Table of Contents

handling, transporting and disposing of hazardous materials and waste products cannot be entirely eliminated. If an accident occurs, we could be held liable for resulting damages, which could be substantial. We are also subject to numerous environmental, health and workplace safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures, exposures to blood-borne pathogens and the handling, transporting and disposing of biohazardous or radioactive materials. Although we maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover us for the costs and expenses we may incur if our employees are injured as a result of using these materials, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. We do not maintain, nor do we plan to obtain, additional insurance coverage relating to damage claims arising from our use of hazardous materials. Further, we may be required to indemnify our collaborators or licensees against damages and other liabilities arising out of our development activities or products. Compliance with the applicable environmental and workplace laws and regulations is expensive. Future changes to environmental, health, workplace and safety laws could cause us to incur additional expenses or may restrict our operations or impair our research, development and production efforts.

 

Risks Related to This Offering

 

There may not be an active, liquid trading market for our common stock.

 

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock. Following this offering, an active, liquid trading market for our common stock may not develop or be maintained. As a result, you may not be able to sell all or a significant portion of your holdings quickly. The initial public offering price of our common stock was determined by negotiation between us and representatives of the underwriters based upon a number of factors, including the history of, and the prospects for, our company and our industry, and may not be indicative of prices that will prevail following the completion of this offering. The market price of our common stock may decline below the initial public offering price, and you may not be able to resell your shares of our common stock at or above the initial public offering price.

 

A significant portion of our total outstanding shares are restricted from immediate resale, but may be sold into the market in the near future. If there are substantial sales of our common stock by our existing stockholders, our stock price could decline.

 

Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market or otherwise after the offering, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the price of our common stock. Holders of approximately 14,010,333 shares of our common stock have entered into lock-up agreements, described in “Underwriting,” that prevent the sale of such shares for up to 180 days after the date of this prospectus, subject to extension under certain circumstances. After expiration of the lock-ups, these shares will be tradeable subject to the restrictions in Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. After this offering, the holders of approximately 13,490,969 shares of our common stock will have rights, subject to some conditions, to require us to file registration statements to permit the resale of their shares in the public market or to include their shares in registration statements that we may file or that we may file for other stockholders. We also intend to register all common stock that we may issue under our employee benefit plans immediately after this offering. As of December 31, 2006, 3,075,843 shares of our common stock were reserved and available for future issuance under our 1998 Stock Plan. Once we register these shares, they can be freely sold in the public market upon issuance, subject to restrictions under the securities laws and the lock-up agreements described above. If any of these stockholders causes a large number of securities to be sold in the public market, or if there is an expectation that such sales may occur, the sales could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline.

 

In addition, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation permits the issuance of up to approximately 78,475,929 million additional shares of common stock after this offering. Thus, we will have the ability to issue substantial amounts of common stock in the future, which would dilute the percentage ownership held by investors who purchase shares of our common stock in this offering.

 

30


Table of Contents

Our stock price will likely be volatile, which may cause your investment in our common stock to decline in value.

 

The stock markets in general, and the market for biotechnology stocks in particular, have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price for our common stock.

 

Price fluctuations could be in response to various factors, including:

 

   

adverse results or delays in our clinical trials or the clinical trials of our collaborators;

 

   

announcements of FDA non-approval of our products, or delays in the FDA or other foreign regulatory agency review process;

 

   

adverse actions taken by regulatory agencies with respect to our product candidates, clinical trials, manufacturing processes or sales and marketing activities;

 

   

introductions or announcements of new products or technological innovations or pricing by our competitors;

 

   

the loss of a significant collaborator;

 

   

disputes or other developments relating to proprietary rights, including patents, litigation matters and our ability to patent our product candidates and technologies;

 

   

changes in estimates of our financial performance by securities analysts or failure to meet or exceed securities analysts’ or investors’ expectations of our annual or quarterly financial results, clinical results or our achievement of any milestones or changes in securities analysts’ recommendations regarding the common stock, other comparable companies or our industry generally;

 

   

fluctuations in stock market prices and trading volumes of similar companies or of the markets generally;

 

   

changes in accounting principles;

 

   

sales of large blocks of our common stock, or the expectation that such sales may occur, including sales by our executive officers, directors and significant stockholders;

 

   

issuance of new shares of common stock in future offerings, or upon the exercise of existing warrants;

 

   

issuance of convertible debt;

 

   

discussion of our business, products, financial performance, prospects or our stock price by the financial and scientific press and online investor communities, such as chat rooms;

 

   

regulatory developments in the United States and abroad;

 

   

third-party healthcare reimbursement policies;

 

   

conditions or trends in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries;

 

   

departures of key personnel;

 

   

announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, clinical trial results, joint ventures or capital commitments; and

 

   

actual or anticipated variations in our annual or quarterly operating results.

 

As a result of these and other factors, you may not be able to resell your shares of common stock at or above the initial public offering price. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted. We may be the target of similar litigation in the future. A securities class action suit against us could result in potential liabilities, substantial costs and the diversion of our management’s attention and resources, regardless of the outcome.

 

31


Table of Contents

You will experience immediate and substantial dilution as a result of this offering and may experience additional dilution in the future.

 

If you purchase common stock in this offering, you may pay more for your shares than the amounts paid by existing stockholders for their shares. As a result, you will incur immediate and substantial dilution of $8.56 per share, representing the difference between our pro forma net tangible book value per share after giving effect to this offering and an assumed initial public offering price of $13.00, the mid-point of the price range on the cover page of this prospectus. Investors purchasing shares of our common stock in this offering will contribute approximately 55.7% of the total amount we have raised to fund the company, but will own only approximately 27.9% of the shares outstanding immediately following the completion of this offering. In the past, we issued certain options and warrants to acquire common stock at prices significantly below the assumed initial public offering price. As of December 31, 2006, we had 264,500 options outstanding with exercise prices ranging from $1.50 to $2.99 with a weighted average price of $1.68 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 2.41 years; 2,061,651 options outstanding with exercise prices ranging from $3.00 to $4.49 with a weighted average price of $3.33 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 8.47 years; 25,000 options outstanding with exercise prices ranging from $4.50 to $5.99 with a weighted average price of $4.95 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 3.27 years; 279,040 options outstanding with exercise prices ranging from $6.00 to $7.49 with a weighted average price of $6.60 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 5.26 years; and 32,667 options outstanding with exercise prices ranging from $7.50 to $8.18 with a weighted average price of $8.18 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 4.65 years. As of December 31, 2006, we had outstanding Series D-1 warrants to purchase 1,254,960 shares of Series D-1 preferred stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share, which expire August 4, 2009. Upon the completion of this offering, the right of the holders of the Series D-1 warrants to receive Series D-1 preferred stock, upon exercise of their warrants, will convert into the right to receive 836,640 shares of our common stock instead of Series D-1 preferred stock. None of our outstanding warrants are callable. To the extent the holders exercise those outstanding options and warrants, you will sustain further dilution. If we raise additional funding by issuing equity securities or convertible debt, or if we acquire other companies or technologies or finance strategic alliances by issuing equity, the newly issued or issuable shares will further dilute your percentage ownership and may also reduce the value of your investment.

 

Provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, bylaws and Delaware law could delay or discourage another company from acquiring us and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.

 

Provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, bylaws and Delaware law may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which you might receive a premium for your shares. In addition, these provisions could make it more difficult for our stockholders to replace or remove our board of directors.

 

These provisions include:

 

   

the application of a Delaware law prohibiting us from entering into a business combination with the beneficial owner of 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock for a period of three years after such 15% or greater owner first reached that level of stock ownership, unless we meet specified criteria;

 

   

authorizing the issuance of preferred stock with rights that may be senior to those of the common stock without any further vote or action by the holders of our common stock;

 

   

providing for a classified board of directors with staggered terms;

 

   

requiring that our stockholders provide advance notice when nominating our directors or proposing matters that can be acted on by stockholders at stockholders’ meetings;

 

   

eliminating the ability of our stockholders to convene a stockholders’ meeting; and

 

   

prohibiting our stockholders to act by written consent.

 

32


Table of Contents

Our management will have broad discretion in the use of net proceeds from this offering.

 

Our management will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds of this offering. We currently intend to use the net proceeds as described in “Use of Proceeds.” However, our plans may change and we could use the net proceeds in ways with which stockholders do not agree, or for corporate purposes that may not result in a significant or any return on your investment.

 

Our executive officers, directors and current principal stockholders own a large percentage of our voting common stock and could limit new stockholders’ influence on corporate decisions.

 

Immediately after this offering, our executive officers, directors, current holders of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock and their respective affiliates will beneficially own, in the aggregate, approximately 60.5% of our outstanding common stock. These stockholders, acting together, would be able to control all matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including mergers, sales of assets, the election of directors, the approval of mergers or other significant corporate transactions. The interests of these stockholders may not always coincide with our corporate interests or the interests of other stockholders, and they may act in a manner with which you may not agree or that may not be in the best interests of our other stockholders.

 

Because we have not previously paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future you will benefit from an investment in our common stock only if it appreciates in value.

 

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to support the growth and development of our business and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. As a result, you should not rely on any investment in our common stock to provide dividend income as part of your investment return. Any return on your investment in our common stock would result from an increase in the market price of your stock, which is uncertain and unpredictable.

 

33


Table of Contents

 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are principally contained in the sections entitled “Prospectus Summary,” “Risk Factors,” “Business,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. For this purpose, any statement that is not a statement of historical fact should be considered a forward-looking statement. We may, in some cases, use words such as “project,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,” or other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes to identify these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include statements about the following:

 

   

our product development efforts, in particular with respect to the clinical trial results and regulatory approval of clevudine, Racivir, R7128 and DFC;

 

   

the initiation, completion or success of preclinical studies and clinical trials;

 

   

clinical trial initiation and completion dates, anticipated regulatory filing dates and regulatory approval for our product candidates;

 

   

the commercialization of our product candidates by our collaborators;

 

   

our collaboration agreement with Roche, including potential milestone or royalty payments thereunder;

 

   

our intentions regarding the establishment of collaborations or the licensing of product candidates or intellectual property;

 

   

our intentions to expand our capabilities and hire additional employees;

 

   

anticipated operating losses, future revenues, research and development expenses, and the need for additional financing;

 

   

our use of proceeds from this offering; and

 

   

our financial performance.

 

Forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties. We discuss many of the risks and uncertainties associated with our business in greater detail under the heading “Risk Factors.” Given these risks and uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this prospectus.

 

You should read this prospectus and the documents that we reference in this prospectus and have filed as exhibits to the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. You should assume that the information appearing in this prospectus is accurate as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus only. Our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects may change. We may not update these forward-looking statements, even though our situation may change in the future, unless we have obligations under the federal securities laws to update and disclose material developments related to previously disclosed information. The forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus are excluded from the safe-harbor protection provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 27A of the Securities Act.

 

34


Table of Contents

 USE OF PROCEEDS

 

We estimate that the net proceeds from this offering will be $69.8 million, or $80.6 million if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, based on an assumed initial public offering price of $13.00 per share, the mid-point of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus, and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

 

A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $13.00 per share would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this offering by approximately $5.6 million, or approximately $6.4 million if the underwriters’ over-allotment option is exercised in full, assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

 

We intend to use the net proceeds of this offering to advance our clinical development program for clevudine into Phase 3 clinical trials. We currently estimate that these clinical trials for clevudine will cost approximately $72.0 million, exclusive of the internal personnel costs associated with conducting these trials, to progress the clinical program to the filing of a New Drug Application with the FDA. In the event that we incur additional costs in connection with these trials or the net proceeds of this offering plus our existing funds is less than $72.0 million, we would need to raise additional capital through public or private equity offerings or debt financings to complete these clinical trials.

 

The amount and timing of our actual expenditures will depend on numerous factors, including the status of our research and development efforts, the timing and success of clinical trials, the timing of regulatory submissions, the amount and timing of any milestone payments under our collaboration agreements and the amount of proceeds actually raised in this offering.

 

Pending the uses described above, we intend to invest the net proceeds from this offering in short-term investments.

 

 DIVIDEND POLICY

 

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to support the growth and development of our business and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

 

35


Table of Contents

 CAPITALIZATION

 

The following table describes our capitalization as of December 31, 2006, (i) on an actual basis; (ii) on a pro forma basis giving effect, upon the closing of this offering, to the automatic conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock and redeemable common stock and the automatic cashless net exercise of Series D-1 warrants into shares of our common stock; and (iii) on a pro forma as adjusted basis to give effect to the sale of 6,000,000 shares of our common stock offered based on an assumed initial public offering price of $13.00 per share, the mid-point of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us. You should read this table in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes to those financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

    As of December 31, 2006

 
        Actual    

    Pro Forma

    Pro Forma
    As Adjusted    


 
    (in thousands, except share data)  

Redeemable stock:

                       

Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock;
$0.001 par value per share; $626 liquidation value; 2,300,000 shares authorized, 367,999 shares issued, outstanding and convertible into 245,333 common shares, actual; no shares authorized, issued or outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted

  $ 625     $     $  

Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock;
$0.001 par value per share; $1,998 liquidation value; 1,357,798 shares authorized, 366,606 shares issued, outstanding and convertible into 250,121 common shares, actual; no shares authorized, issued or outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted

    1,996              

Series D redeemable convertible preferred stock;
$0.001 par value per share; $12,779 liquidation value; 7,843,380 shares authorized, 2,505,686 shares issued, outstanding and convertible into 1,670,457 common shares, actual; no shares authorized, issued or outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted

    13,225              

Series R redeemable convertible preferred stock;
$0.001 par value per share; $4,000 liquidation value; 400,000 shares authorized, issued, outstanding and convertible into 266,667 common shares, actual; no shares authorized, issued or outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted

    3,815              

Redeemable common stock;
$0.001 par value per share; 213,307 shares authorized, issued and outstanding, actual; no shares authorized, issued or outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted

    1,392              

Stockholders’ Equity:

                       

Series A convertible preferred stock; $0.001 par value per share; $3,685 liquidation value; 3,200,000 shares authorized, 2,639,722 shares issued, outstanding and convertible into 1,759,814 common shares, actual; no shares authorized, issued or outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted

    3              

Series D-1 warrants to purchase 1,254,960 shares of D-1 convertible preferred stock for $0.10 per share, convertible into 836,640 common shares; exercisable starting August 4, 2006

    5,412              

Preferred Stock; $0.001 par value per share; no shares authorized, issued and outstanding, actual and pro forma; 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding, pro forma as adjusted

                 

Common stock; $0.001 par value per share; 30,000,000 shares authorized, 10,291,386 shares issued and outstanding, actual; 30,000,000 shares authorized, 15,524,071 shares issued and outstanding, pro forma; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 21,524,071 shares issued and outstanding, pro forma as adjusted

    10       16       22  

Additional paid-in capital

    45,285       71,747       142,281  

Accumulated other comprehensive income

    4       4       4  

Accumulated deficit

    (46,706 )     (46,706 )     (46,706 )
   


 


 


Total stockholders’ equity

  $ 4,008     $ 25,061     $ 95,601  
   


 


 


Total Capitalization

  $ 25,061     $ 25,061     $ 95,601  
   


 


 


 

The table above excludes an aggregate of 2,662,858 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2006 at a weighted average exercise price per share of $3.59.

 

36


Table of Contents

 DILUTION

 

Purchasers of shares of our common stock in this offering will experience an immediate and substantial dilution in net tangible book value per share. Dilution is the amount by which the initial public offering price paid by purchasers of shares of our common stock exceeds the net tangible book value per share immediately following the completion of this offering. Net tangible book value represents our total tangible assets reduced by our total liabilities. Net tangible book value per share represents our net tangible book value divided by the number of shares of common stock outstanding.

 

As of December 31, 2006, our net tangible book value was $4.0 million and our net tangible book value per share was $0.39. As of December 31, 2006, after giving effect to the automatic conversion of all outstanding shares of preferred stock and redeemable common stock and the automatic cashless net exercise of Series D-1 warrants into 5,232,685 shares of our common stock upon completion of the offering, the pro forma net tangible book value would have been $25.1 million and the pro forma net tangible book value per share would have been $1.61. As of December 31, 2006, after giving effect to the sale of the shares of our common stock offered by this prospectus at an assumed initial public offering price of $13.00 per share, the mid-point of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and after deducting underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses payable by us, the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock would have been $4.44 per share. Therefore, new investors in our common stock would have been diluted by approximately $8.56 per share. At the same time, our existing stockholders would have realized an increase in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value of $2.83 per share after this offering. The following table illustrates this per share dilution:

 

Assumed initial public offering price per share

        $ 13.00

Net tangible book value per share as of December 31, 2006

  $ 0.39      

Increase per share attributable to conversion of preferred stock and redeemable common stock

    1.22      
   

     

Pro forma net tangible book value per share before this offering

  $ 1.61      

Increase in pro forma net tangible book value per share attributable to this offering

    2.83      
   

     

Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share

          4.44
         

Dilution per share to new investors

        $ 8.56
         

 

If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option to purchase additional shares in this offering in full, the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value after the offering would be $106.5 million and the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share would be $4.75, representing a dilution in pro forma net tangible book value of $8.25 per share to new investors purchasing shares in this offering. At the same time, our existing stockholders would have realized an increase in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value of $3.14 per share after this offering.

 

The following table summarizes, as of December 31, 2006, on a pro forma as adjusted basis as described above, the number of shares of common stock purchased in this offering, the total consideration paid and the average price per share paid by existing and new stockholders:

 

     Shares Purchased

   Total Consideration

  

Average Price

Per Share


     Number

   %

   Amount

   %

  

Existing stockholders

   15,524,071    72.1%    $ 62,000,000    44.3%    $ 3.99

New investors

   6,000,000    27.9         78,000,000    55.7       $ 13.00
    
  
  

  
      

Total

   21,524,071    100%    $ 140,000,000    100%       
    
  
  

  
      

 

37


Table of Contents

If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option to purchase additional shares in this offering in full, our existing stockholders would own 69.2% and our new investors would own 30.8% of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding after this offering.

 

The foregoing discussion and tables assume no exercise of any outstanding common stock options to purchase preferred stock. As of December 31, 2006, options to purchase a total of 2,662,858 shares of our common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $3.59 per share were outstanding. To the extent that any of these options is exercised, your investment will be further diluted. We may grant more options in the future.

 

In addition, we may choose to raise additional capital due to market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. To the extent that additional capital is raised through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of these securities could result in further dilution to our stockholders.

 

38


Table of Contents

 SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

 

The following table presents our selected consolidated financial information. In 2005, we changed our fiscal year end from December 31 to September 30 for financial reporting purposes. The change was effective for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2005. The following selected statement of operations data for the year ended December 31, 2004, the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and the year ended September 30, 2006 and the balance sheet data as of September 30, 2005 and 2006 have been derived from our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary statement of operations data for the three months ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2006, have been derived from our unaudited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus and have been prepared on the same basis as our financial statements. In the opinion of management, the unaudited selected financial data presented below reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of this data. The statement of operations data for the year ended December 31, 2003 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2004 have been derived from our audited financial statements that are not included in this prospectus. The statement of operations data for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2002 and 2003 is derived from our unaudited financial data that are not included in this prospectus. The results from the nine-month period ended September 30, 2005 are not indicative of results that would have been achieved for the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2005.

 

The pro forma net loss per common share reflects the automatic conversion upon the closing of this offering of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock and redeemable common stock into shares of our common stock as of the beginning of each period presented. The pro forma as adjusted balance sheet data reflect the automatic conversion upon the closing of this offering of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock and redeemable common stock into shares of our common stock as well as the sale of 6,000,000 shares of our common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $13.00 per share, the mid-point of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us.

 

The selected financial data set forth below should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes to those financial statements, as well as “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in any future period, and the results for the three months ended December 31, 2006 are not indicative of results expected for the full fiscal year.

 

    Year Ended December 31,

   

Nine Months
Ended

September 30,


    Year Ended
September 30,


   

Three Months
Ended

December 31,


    2002

    2003

   

2004

Restated(1)


   

2005

Restated(1)


    2006

   

2005

Restated(1)


    2006

    (in thousands, except share and per share data)

Statement of Operations Data:

                                                     

Revenues:

                                                     

Contract revenues

        $ 509     $ 2,208     $ 3,719     $ 5,425     $ 833     $ 8,117

Contract revenues, related parties

  $ 3,393                                    

Government grant revenues

    299       538       545                        
   


 


 


 


 


 


 

Total revenues

    3,692       1,047       2,753       3,719       5,425       833       8,117
   


 


 


 


 


 


 

Costs and expenses:

                                                     

Research and development

    5,751       4,809       5,317       10,468       10,498       2,244       2,562

General and administrative

    1,321       1,761       2,898       8,096       7,911       1,960       2,055
   


 


 


 


 


 


 

Total costs and expenses

    7,072       6,570       8,215       18,564       18,409       4,204       4,617
   


 


 


 


 


 


 

Operating (loss) profit

    (3,380 )     (5,522 )     (5,462 )     (14,845 )     (12,984 )     (3,371 )     3,500

Investment income

    333       182       495       1,136       1,659       280       407
   


 


 


 


 


 


 

(Loss) profit before income taxes

    (3,047 )     (5,341 )     (4,967 )     (13,709 )     (11,325 )     (3,091 )     3,907

Provision for income taxes

    84       337       17                        
   


 


 


 


 


 


 

Net (loss) profit

    (3,131 )     (5,677 )     (4,984 )     (13,709 )     (11,325 )     (3,091 )     3,907

Preferred stock accretion

    37       37       1,317       2,287       1,111       274       284
   


 


 


 


 


 


 

Net (loss) profit attributable to common shareholders

  $ (3,168 )   $ (5,714 )   $ (6,301 )   $ (15,996 )   $ (12,436 )   $ (3,365 )   $ 3,623
   


 


 


 


 


 


 

 

39


Table of Contents
    Year Ended December 31,

   

Nine Months
Ended

September 30,


   

Year Ended

September 30,


   

Three Months Ended

December 31,


    2002

    2003

   

2004

Restated(1)


   

2005

Restated(1)


    2006

    2005
Restated(1)


    2006

    (in thousands, except share and per share data)            

Net (loss) profit per common share:

                                                     

Basic

  $ (0.81 )   $ (1.40 )   $ (1.53 )   $ (2.42 )   $ (1.19 )   $ (0.33 )   $ 0.35

Diluted

  $ (0.81 )   $ (1.40 )   $ (1.53 )   $ (2.42 )   $ (1.19 )   $ (0.33 )   $ 0.33

Weighted average number of shares used in per common share calculations:

                                                     

Basic

    3,894,167       4,107,473       4,110,997       6,630,463       10,462,369       10,374,839       10,504,693

Diluted

    3,894,167       4,107,473       4,110,997       6,630,463       10,462,369       10,374,839       11,009,257

Pro forma net (loss) profit per common share:

                                                     

Basic

                                  $ (0.86 )           $ 0.24

Diluted

                                  $ (0.86 )           $ 0.23

Weighted average number of shares used in pro forma per common share calculations:

                                                     

Basic

                                    14,654,761               14,697,085

Diluted

                                    14,654,761               16,019,055

 

    As of December 31,

    As of
September 30,


  As of
September 30,


    As of
December 31,


   
    2002

  2003

 

2004

Restated(1)


   

2005

Restated(1)


  2006

    2006

  Pro Forma
As Adjusted


    (in thousands)    

Balance Sheet Data:

                                             

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 9,763   $ 1,823   $ 307     $ 33,442   $ 26,182     $ 29,312   $ 99,852

Short-term investments

        7,975     54,932       12,007     1,250       1,252     1,252

Working capital

    9,076     7,955     51,687       38,822     25,004       29,207     99,747

Total assets

    11,682     12,363     57,417       47,441     32,998       36,927     107,467

Deferred revenue

        5,769     12,136       12,044     9,168       8,976     8,976

Redeemable convertible preferred stock

    11,233     11,270     50,178       18,530     19,641       19,661    

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)

  $ 10,594   $ 5,473   $ (7,431 )   $ 11,668   $ (220 )   $ 4,008   $ 95,601

(1)   Management determined, subsequent to their issuance, that our financial statements for fiscal year 2004, the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and the three months ended December 31, 2005 should be restated to increase the carrying value of the Series D Preferred Stock as of December 31, 2004, September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2005 to include amounts representing dividends using the interest method. See Note 15 to the audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

40


Table of Contents

 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following discussion and analysis should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes to those financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, including those set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus. Our actual results and the timing of events discussed below could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking Statements.”

 

Management determined, subsequent to their issuance, that our financial statements for the fiscal years 2004 and 2005 and the three months ended December 31, 2005 should be restated to increase the carrying value of the Series D Preferred Stock as of December 31, 2004, September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2005 to include amounts representing dividends using the interest method. This restatement is further described in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The accompanying management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations gives effect to the restatement.

 

Overview

 

We are a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company committed to discovering, developing and commercializing novel drugs to treat viral infections. Our primary focus is on the development of oral therapeutics for the treatment of HBV, HCV and HIV. Our research and development efforts focus on a class of compounds known as nucleoside analogs, which act to inhibit the natural enzymes required for viral replication. We are currently focusing on three product candidates, two of which we are developing ourselves and one of which we are developing with a strategic partner: clevudine, for the treatment of HBV, expected to enter Phase 3 registration clinical trials in the second calendar quarter of 2007; R7128, for the treatment of HCV, in a Phase 1 clinical trial; and Racivir, for the treatment of HIV, in a Phase 2 clinical trial. Additionally, we are evaluating the efficacy and safety of DFC for the treatment of HIV following the completion of a Phase 2b clinical trial. We are also applying our expertise in nucleoside chemistry to the discovery and development of additional antiviral therapeutics.

 

Clevudine is an oral, once-daily pyrimidine nucleoside analog that we are developing for the treatment of HBV. We licensed clevudine from Bukwang, a Korean pharmaceutical company. Bukwang recently initiated the commercial launch of clevudine in the Korean market under the brand name Levovir now that clevudine has received final approval from Korean regulators. In two completed Korean Phase 3 clinical trials in 337 patients, Studies 301 and 302, clevudine demonstrated the ability to significantly reduce HBV viral load in patients. In March 2006, Bukwang completed Study 303, a Korean open-label study of clevudine in 55 HBV patients, including 15 patients in whom the e-antigen was not present and who have not been previously exposed to antiviral therapies, referred to as treatment-naïve patients. The results of Study 303 are consistent with the results of Studies 301 and 302. Additionally, in Study 303, 80% of e-antigen negative patients sustained a viral load that was undetectable by PCR 12 weeks after completing the 48-week course of therapy. We plan to initiate two Phase 3 clinical trials of clevudine in the United States and Europe in the second calendar quarter of 2007 to determine its safety and efficacy in patients given 30 mg per day over a 48-week treatment course when compared to adefovir, an approved HBV therapy.

 

In October 2006, Roche and we initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial with R7128 designed to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of R7128 in healthy volunteers and HCV-infected patients, as well as provide antiviral potency data over 14 days in HCV-infected patients. We currently anticipate that the data from this study will be available in the third quarter of 2007, and we anticipate the initiation of a 28-day combination study of R7128 with Pegasys and Copegus in the fourth quarter of 2007. Further testing will be required to provide enough evidence regarding safety and efficacy to support an application with the FDA in the future. In November 2005, Roche and we initiated a clinical trial outside the United States in healthy human volunteers to assess the safety

 

41


Table of Contents

and pharmacokinetics of orally administered PSI-6130. In this study, single oral doses of PSI-6130 were generally well-tolerated with no serious adverse events in doses up to 3,000 mg and achieved bioavailability and pharmacokinetic properties that are likely to be associated with antiviral activity in people infected with HCV. We believe that R7128 may be able to achieve similar results at a lower dose.

 

Racivir is an oral, once-daily cytidine nucleoside analog that we are developing as an HIV therapy for use in combination with other approved HIV drugs. In a recently completed Phase 2 clinical trial, for those patients carrying the M184V mutation and less than three thymidine analog mutations, replacing lamivudine with Racivir in their existing therapies caused a mean decrease in viral load of 0.7 log (80% reduction) in the second week of treatment, with 28% of these patients achieving an undetectable level of virus (less than 400 copies per milliliter) and 64% of these patients achieving at least a 0.5 log decrease (68% reduction) in viral load.

 

DFC is an oral, once-daily cytidine nucleoside analog that we are evaluating for the treatment of HIV. In clinical and preclinical studies, DFC was active against most viruses containing drug-resistant mutations arising from the use of Viread, Epivir, Emtriva, Retrovir and others. We had been developing DFC in collaboration with Incyte Corporation until April 3, 2006, when Incyte announced its decision to discontinue its development of DFC after observing an increased incidence of grade 4 hyperlipasemia in the rollover portion of a Phase 2b clinical trial. Hyperlipasemia can be a marker of pancreatic inflammation. Incyte has terminated our license agreement and returned its rights related to DFC to us. As a result of this termination, we will no longer be eligible to receive milestone payments or royalties from Incyte with respect to DFC, and we will be solely responsible for any additional expenses that we may incur in connection with the development of DFC. We are analyzing the preclinical and clinical data on DFC generated by Incyte. Based on our preliminary review of the data provided to us, we believe further analysis of the merits of continuing to develop DFC is warranted.

 

Results of prior clinical trials do not provide enough evidence to support an NDA filing with the FDA and additional trials will be needed. Results of our ongoing trials and any future trials we may conduct may not corroborate earlier results.

 

We have incurred substantial operating losses since our inception because we have devoted substantially all of our resources to our research and development activities and have not generated any revenue from the sale of approved drugs. As of December 31, 2006, we had an accumulated deficit of $46.7 million. We expect our operating losses to increase for at least the next several years as we continue to pursue the clinical development of clevudine, Racivir and our other product candidates, and as we expand our discovery and development pipeline. We expect our compensation expense to increase in the future as we implement our planned increase in the number of our employees. During July 2005, we moved our corporate headquarters, laboratory operations and employees from Atlanta, Georgia to Princeton, New Jersey. Our overall occupancy expenses increased due to a 64% increase in occupancy costs per square foot and an 87% increase in square feet occupied at the Princeton facility compared to the Atlanta facility. We spent a total of approximately $1.8 million in leasehold improvements and $404,000 on laboratory equipment to complete the build-out of our new facility.

 

We have funded our operations primarily through the sale of equity securities, payments received under collaboration agreements, government grants and interest earned on investments. We expect to continue to fund our operations over the next several years primarily through the net proceeds of this offering, our existing cash resources, potential future milestone payments that we expect to receive from Roche if certain conditions are satisfied, and interest earned on our investments. We may require significant additional financing in the future to fund our operations. Additional financing may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. As of December 31, 2006, we had approximately $29.3 million of cash and cash equivalents and approximately $1.3 million of short-term investments.

 

In 2005, we changed our fiscal year end from December 31 to September 30 for financial reporting purposes. The change was effective for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2005. For tax reporting purposes in 2005, we retained a twelve-month year ending December 31, 2005.

 

42


Table of Contents

Corporate History

 

We were initially incorporated as Pharmasset, Ltd. on May 29, 1998 under the laws of Barbados. We became domesticated as a corporation under the laws of the State of Delaware on June 8, 2004 as Pharmasset, Inc., and the existence of Pharmasset, Ltd. in Barbados was discontinued on June 21, 2004. Pharmasset, Inc., then-existing as a Georgia corporation and our only subsidiary, was merged with and into us on July 23, 2004. We currently have no subsidiaries.

 

Revenue

 

All of our product candidates are currently in development, and, therefore, we do not expect to generate any direct revenue from drug product sales for at least the next several years, if at all. Our revenues to date have been generated primarily from milestone payments under our collaboration agreements, license fees, research funding and grants. We have entered into two collaboration agreements, one with Incyte for the development of DFC and one with Roche for the development of PSI-6130, its pro-drugs and related compounds. When we entered into our collaboration agreement with Incyte in September 2003, Incyte paid us an up-front payment of $6.3 million as a license fee and partial reimbursement for past development and patent costs. When we entered into our collaboration agreement with Roche in October 2004, Roche subsequently paid us an up-front payment of $8.0 million. In August 2005, we received $1.5 million in payments from Incyte for achieving a contractually defined milestone. Pursuant to the terms of our collaboration agreement with Roche, we received $2.1 million in payments during the nine months ended September 30, 2005, $2.5 million during the year ended September 30, 2006 and $7.5 million during the three months ended December 31, 2006. As of December 31, 2006, we had received an aggregate of $28.8 million in payments under these two collaboration agreements, including research funding and related fees as well as up-front and milestone payments. On April 3, 2006, Incyte announced its decision to discontinue its development of DFC. Incyte has subsequently terminated its agreement with us.

 

Under the current terms of the Roche collaboration agreement if we succeed in obtaining all of the regulatory approvals specified in the agreement for PSI-6130 or a pro-drug of PSI-6130, including R7128, the maximum development and commercialization milestone and research funding payments payable to us are $135.0 million and $375,000, respectively. We expect to receive from Roche $5.0 million of the above described milestone payments in the quarter ending March 31, 2007 due to the initiation, in February 2007, of the multiple ascending dose portion of our ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial of R7128. Under the terms of our agreement with Roche, we are also entitled to receive a $7.5 million milestone payment if and when this Phase 1 clinical trial is successfully completed or upon initiation of the first Phase 2 clinical trial. Receipt of any additional milestone payments depends on many factors, some of which are beyond our control. We cannot assure you that we will receive any of these future payments. Additional milestone funding may be payable to us if molecules in addition to PSI-6130 or its pro-drugs are developed under the Roche agreement.

 

We expect our revenues for the next several years to be derived primarily from payments under our current collaboration agreement with Roche and any additional collaborations that we may enter into in the future. In addition to the payments described above, we may receive future royalties on product sales, if any, under our collaboration agreement with Roche.

 

Research and Development Expenses

 

Our research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related personnel expenses, fees paid to external service providers, up-front payments under our license agreements, patent-related legal fees, costs of preclinical studies and clinical trials, drug and laboratory supplies and costs for facilities and equipment. We charge all research and development expenses to operations as they are incurred. Our research and development activities are primarily focused on the development of clevudine, Racivir, R7128 and DFC. In the second quarter of 2005, we in-licensed from Bukwang the rights to develop and commercialize clevudine in North America and certain other territories. We are responsible for all additional costs incurred in the future in the clinical development of clevudine, except for those preclinical or clinical studies that Bukwang previously initiated or that Bukwang and/or Eisai Pharmaceuticals (to whom Bukwang licensed commercial rights to

 

43


Table of Contents

clevudine in certain Asian territories) conduct independently in the future for the registration of clevudine in their respective territories. We are responsible for all costs incurred in the clinical development of Racivir, as well as the research costs associated with our other internal research programs. Incyte had been funding the clinical development and commercialization of DFC, but upon its return to us by Incyte, we will be responsible for any additional expenses. Under our collaboration with Roche, Roche will fund the clinical development and commercialization of PSI-6130 and its pro-drugs, including R7128. Under this collaboration, Roche will reimburse us for all of the currently expected external expenses (up to $4.5 million) associated with, and we will be responsible for, certain preclinical work, the IND filing, and the initial clinical trial. Roche will fund all of the expenses of, and be responsible for, other preclinical studies and future clinical development. We will continue to develop and retain worldwide rights to ongoing and future HCV programs unrelated to the PSI-6130 series of nucleoside polymerase inhibitors licensed to Roche.

 

We use our internal research and development resources, including our employees and discovery infrastructure, across various projects and our related internal expenses are not attributable to a specific project, but are directed to broadly applicable research activities. Accordingly, we do not account for our internal research and development expenses on a project basis. These expenses are included in the “unattributed expenses” category in the table below. We use external service providers to manufacture our product candidates for clinical trials and for the substantial majority of our preclinical and clinical development work. We have tracked some of these external research and development expenses on a project basis. To the extent that expenses associated with external service providers are not attributable to a specific project, they are included in the “unattributed expenses” category in the table below.

 

The following table summarizes our research and development expenses for our current development programs for the year ended December 31, 2004, the nine months ended September 30, 2005, the year ended September 30, 2006 and the three months ended December 31, 2006.

 

    

Year Ended
December 31,

2004


  

Nine Months
Ended
September 30,

2005


  

Year Ended
September 30,

2006


  

Three Months
Ended
December 31,

2006